Publication Numbers:
                                      EPA: 505B08001
                                      DoD: XXXXXXXXX
MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN
  HAZARD ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
                 I
                 55
LU
                        o<-°
                 INTERIM
               OCTOBER 2008

-------
This page intentionally left blank.

-------
                                ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Technical expertise for the munitions and  explosives of concern  hazard  assessment  (MEC HA)
methodology was provided by the Technical Working Group for Hazard Assessment (TWO HA). The
TWG HA included representatives from the Department of Defense (DoD), the U.S.  Department of the
Interior (DOI), Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO), and
Tribal Association for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (TASWER), and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP - HAZARD ASSESSMENT
Dwight Hempel
Doug Maddox
Norrell Lantzer
Ruth Lodder
Douglas Murray
Kevin Oates
Clem Rastatter
Syed Rizvi
Jennifer Roberts
Clarence Smith
William Veith
Victor Wieszek
Laura Wrench
Dick Wright
USDOI, Bureau of Land Management
US EPA, Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office
VERSAR
USDOI
DoD, US Navy
US EPA, Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office
VERSAR
TASWER
State of Alaska, ASTSWMO
State of Illinois, ASTSWMO
DoD, US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
DoD, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Installation and Environment /
Environmental Management
VERSAR
Noblis
The TWG HA also wishes to express its gratitude to the following for their participation in pilot tests of
the hazard assessment technical framework at Camp Beale (California) and Camp Butner (North
Carolina).
PILOT TEST PROJECT TEAMS
Camp Beale
Jim Austreng
Pete Broderick
Donn Diebert
John Esparza
Neal Navarro
Jennifer Payne
Ed Walker

California Dept. of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
USACE-Sacramento
DTSC
USACE-Sacramento
USACE-Sacramento
USACE-Sacramento
DTSC
Camp Butner
John Baden
Marti Morgan
Art Schacter

USACE-Wilmington
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR)
NCDENR
In addition, a group of stakeholders provided valuable comments on the draft guidance document.  The
TWG HA wish to thank Arlen Crabb (Aberdeen Proving Ground Restoration Advisory Board (RAB),
Maryland); Chris Riggio (Adak Island RAB, Alaska); Deanna Spehn (Tierrasanta Community Council,

-------
California); Lenny Siegel (Center for Public Environmental Oversight); and Michael Houlemard (Fort
Ord, California) for their input and willingness to participate in this project.

Versar, Inc. provided technical assistance to the TWO HA in the development of this document, under
EPA Contract No. EP-W-04-035.  While a number of Versar staff worked on this document, lead
technical support was provided by Ms. Laura Wrench.

-------
                                     FOREWORD
This document describes the munitions and explosives of concern hazard assessment (MEC HA)
methodology for assessing potential explosive hazards to human receptors at munitions response
sites (MRSs). The MEC  HA allows  a project team to  evaluate the potential explosive hazard
associated with an MRS, given current conditions and under various cleanup, land use activities,
and land use control alternatives.
The  statutory provisions  and regulations described in  this document contain  legally binding
requirements. This document is not a regulation itself,  nor does it alter or substitute  for those
provisions and regulations. Thus, it does not impose any legally binding requirements on EPA,
States, Tribes, DoD, or other federal agencies, or other members  of the regulated community.
This document does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations upon any member of the
public.
The methodology presented in this document may not apply to a particular situation based upon
site-specific circumstances. Interested parties are free to raise questions about the  substance of
this document and the appropriateness of the  application of the  methodology  to a particular
situation.  This document may be revised periodically by the sponsoring organizations without
public notice. The Technical Work Group welcomes public input on this document at any time.

-------
                                                                   MEC HA Methodology
                                                                          October 2008
                                                                               Page vi
                                  Table of Contents
ACRONYMS	x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	xii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE MEC HA 	1
  1.1    Background of the MEC HA	1
  1.2    Purpose of the MEC HA	2
  1.3    Scope and Applicability of the MEC HA	3
  1.4    Benefits of the MEC HA	3
  1.5    Role of the Protocol and the MEC HA in the CERCLA Process	4
  1.6    Differences Between MEC Hazard Assessment and Environmental Contaminant Risk
  Assessment	8
  1.7    Presence of Critical Infrastructure, Cultural Resources, or Ecological Resources	9
  1.8    Organization of the MEC HA Methodology Document	9
CHAPTER 2: UNDERSTANDING THE HAZARD ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK	10
  2.1    Components of Explosive Hazard	10
  2.2    Elements of the MEC HA	10
  2.2.1   MEC HA Input Factors	10
  2.2.2   MEC HA Structure	11
  2.2.3   Outputs from the MEC HA Scoring	15
CHAPTER 3: SCOPING THE HAZARD ASSESSMENT	17
  3.1    Project Team	17
  3.2    Outreach	19
  3.3    Overview of the MEC HA	19
  3.3.1   Planning the MEC HA	19
  3.3.2   Identifying the Area to be Assessed	21
  3.3.3   Compiling Information	21
  3.3.4   Implementing	24
  3.3.5   Documenting	24
  3.4    Data Quality Issues	25
CHAPTER 4: INPUT FACTORS AND SCORING	28
  4.1    Energetic Material Type	28
     4.1.1    Scores for Energetic Material Type Categories	30
     4.1.2    Category Changes for Energetic Material Type	30
  4.2    Location of Additional Human Receptors	30
  4.2.1   Scores for Location of Additional Human Receptors Categories	31
  4.2.2   Category Changes for Location of Additional Human Receptors	32
  4.3    Site Accessibility	33
  4.3.1   Scores for Site Accessibility Categories	33
  4.3.2   Category Changes for Site Accessibility	34
  4.4    Potential Contact Hours	34
  4.4.1   Scores for Potential ContactHours Categories	35
  4.4.2   Category Changes for Potential ContactHours	35
  4.5    Amount of MEC	35
  4.5.1   Scores for Amount of MEC Categories	36
  4.5.2   Category Changes for Amount of MEC	37
Table of Contents

-------
                                                                   MEC HA Methodology
                                                                          October 2008
                                                                              Page vii

  4.6    Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth	37
  4.6.1   Scores for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth Categories
         	40
  4.6.2   Category Changes for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive
  Depth  	40
  4.7    Migration Potential	41
  4.7.1   Scores for Migration Potential	41
  4.7.2   Category Changes for Migration Potential	41
  4.8    MEC Classification	41
  4.8.1   Scores for MEC Classification Categories	45
  4.8.2   Category Changes for MEC Classification	45
  4.9    MEC Size	45
  4.9.1   Scores for MEC Size Categories	45
  4.9.2   Category Changes for MEC Size	46
  4.10   Scoring Considerations	46
  4.11   Summary of MEC HA Scores	47
  4.12   Relationships between Protocol EHE Data Elements and MEC HA Input Factors	49
CHAPTER 5: OUTPUT OF THE MEC HA: HAZARD LEVELS	52
  5.1    Scoring and Hazard Levels	52
  5.1.1   Hazard Level 1	53
  5.1.2   Hazard Level 2	53
  5.1.3   Hazard Level 3	53
  5.1.4   Hazard Level 4	54
  5.2 MEC HA in the CERCLA Remedy Evaluation and Selection Process	55
  5.2.1   CERCLA Removal Process	55
  5.2.2   CERCLA Remedial Process	56
GLOSSARY	62
Table of Contents

-------
                                                                    MEC HA Methodology
                                                                            October 2008
                                                                               Page viii
                                     List of Tables
Table 1-1. Comparison Between the Protocol and MEC HA	4
Table 2-1. Components of Explosive Hazard in MEC HA	10
Table 2-2. Framework Elements of the MEC HA	10
Table 2-3. Numeric Structure Characteristics of the MEC HA	11
Table 2-4. Input Factor Maximum Scores and Resulting Weights	13
Table 2-5. Scores for Input Factor Categories	14
Table 2-6. Hazard Level Scoring Ranges	16
Table 3-1. Potential Project Team Members for Common Types of MRSs	17
Table 3-2. Required  Types of Data and Likely Sources	22
Table 3-3. Data Quality of Different Information Sources	25
Table 4-1. Input Factor Categories: Energetic Material Type	29
Table 4-2. Scores for Energetic Material Type Categories	30
Table 4-3. Input Factor Categories: Location of Additional Human Receptors	31
Table 4-4. Scores for Location of Additional Human Receptors Categories	31
Table 4-5. Input Factor Categories: Site Accessibility	33
Table 4-6. Scores for Site Accessibility Categories	33
Table 4-7. Input Factor Categories: Potential Contact Hours	34
Table 4-8. Scores for Potential Contact Hours Categories	35
Table 4-9. Input Factor Categories: Amount of MEC	36
Table 4-10. Scores for Amount of MEC Categories	37
Table 4-11. Input Factor Categories: Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive
    Depth	37
Table 4-12. Scores for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth
    Categories	40
Table 4-13. Input Factor Categories: Migration Potential	41
Table 4-14. Scores for Migration Potential Categories	41
Table4-15. InputFactor Categories: MEC Classification	42
Table 4-16. Scores for MEC Classification Categories	45
Table 4-17. Input Factor Categories: MEC Size	45
Table 4-18. Scores for MEC Size Categories	45
Table 4-19. Complete MEC HA Scoring Table	47
Table 4-20. Relationship between Protocol EHE Data Elements and MEC HA Input Factors... 50
Table 5-1. Hazard Level Scores	52
Table 5-2. CERCLA Removal Action Alternative Selection Criteria	55
Table 5-3. CERCLA Nine-criteria and MEC HA Inputs and Outputs: Considerations for
    Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives	57
Table of Contents

-------
                                                             MEC HA Methodology
                                                                    October 2008
                                                                        Page ix
                                List of Figures
Figure 1-1. Application of the MEC Hazard Assessment During the CERCLA Process	7
Figure 3-1. Overview of Hazard Assessment Process	20
Figure 3A-1. Munitions Response Area Containing Three MRSs	27
Figure 4-1. Location of Additional Human Receptors	32
Figure 4-2. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Depth of Receptor Activities	39
Figure 4-3. Selecting the MEC Classification Category for Cased Munitions	44

                                  Appendices

APPENDIX A: AUTOMATED SCORING WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX B: EXAMPLE MEC HA WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C: ANSWERS TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
APPENDIX D: REPORT ON THE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR MEC HA INPUT FACTOR
            SCORES, WEIGHTING, AND HAZARD LEVELS
Table of Contents

-------
                                                                   MEC HA Methodology
                                                                          October 2008
                                                                               Page x
                                    ACRONYMS
AFCEE    Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
ARARs    Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
ASR       Archive Search Report
ASTSWMO Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials
BRAC     Base Realignment and Closure
CERCLA   Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CSM       Conceptual Site Model
CTT       Closed, Transferred, and Transferring
CWM      Chemical Warfare Material
DD        Decision Document
DDESB    Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board
DMM      Discarded Military Munitions
DoD       Department of Defense
DOT       Department of the Interior
DQO       Data Quality Objective
DTSC      Department of Toxic Substances Control
EE/CA     Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
EOD       Explosive Ordnance Disposal
EPA       Environmental Protection Agency
ESP       Explosives Siting Plan
ESQD      Explosive safety quantity-distance
ESS       Explosives Safety  Submission
FS         Feasibility Study
FUDS      Formerly Used Defense Sites
HA        Hazard Assessment
HE        High Explosive
HEAT     High Explosive Anti-Tank
HMX      High Melting Explosive; Octahydro-l,3,5,7-tetranitro-triazine
HTRW     Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste
LUCs      Land Use Controls
MC        Munitions Constituents
MEC       Munitions and Explosives of Concern
MEC HA   Munitions and Explosives of Concern Hazard Assessment
MMRP     Military Munitions Response Program
MRA      Munitions Response Area
MRS       Munitions Response Site
MRSPP    Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol
NAVFAC   Naval Facilities Engineering Command
NCDENR   North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NCP       National  Contingency Plan
NTCRA    Non-Time Critical Removal Action
OB/OD    Open Burning/Open Detonation
PA/SI      Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection
QA/QC    Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Acronyms

-------
                                                                   MEC HA Methodology
                                                                           October 2008
                                                                               Page xi
RAB       Restoration Advisory Board
RCRA     Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RDX       Royal Demolition Explosive; Hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-triazine
RFI/CMS   RCRA Facility Investigation/Corrective Measure Study
RI         Remedial Investigation
ROD       Record Of Decision
SPP       Systematic Planning Process
TASWER  Tribal Association for Solid Waste and Emergency Response
TCRA     Time Critical Removal Action
TNT       2,4,6-trinitrotoluene
TPP       Technical Project Planning
TWG HA   Technical Working Group for Hazard Assessment
USAGE    United States Army Corps of Engineers
UXO       Unexploded Ordnance
WP        White Phosphorus
Acronyms

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page xii
                               EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document describes the munitions and explosives of concern hazard assessment (MEC HA)
methodology for assessing potential explosive hazards to human receptors at munitions response
sites (MRS). The MEC HA allows a project team to evaluate  the potential explosive hazard
associated with an MRS, given current or reasonably anticipated future conditions, and under
various cleanup, land use activities, and land use control alternatives.
This document was developed by the Technical Working Group for Hazard Assessment, which
consists of representatives from the Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of the Interior,
State program managers  from Association of State and Territorial  Solid  Waste Management
Officials,  Tribal  Association for  Solid  Waste  and  Emergency  Response,  and the  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.  These  organizations provided personnel  to  develop the
technical framework for this hazard assessment methodology document.
The  MEC  HA is  designed to  provide  benefits  at  the project team level  (e.g.,  individual
installation or site). It  is intended to reduce costs  and streamline the evaluation  of explosive
hazards by providing project teams with a consistent, accepted methodology. The MEC HA will
support consistency and reproducibility of efforts at multiple MRS. Its repeated use by project
teams will further reduce costs through familiarity and  ease of oversight. The MEC HA will
promote mutual understanding of technical issues on the MRS  through a  collaborative,  team-
based hazard assessment process. The MEC HA  is designed to enhance communication of
hazards within a  project team,  and between project teams and external stakeholders. At the
program level, the MEC HA will provide benefits by instilling  confidence in decision-making
through the use of a standardized hazard assessment approach, and support  understanding at the
national level of the process that project teams are using to help support decisions.
The MEC HA is intended to fit into military munitions response program (MMRP) activities and
the regulatory structure of the  Comprehensive Environmental Response,  Compensation,  and
Liability Act (CERCLA). It addresses the National Contingency Plan (NCP) direction to conduct
site-specific risk assessments for threats to human health and the environment.
The  MEC HA reflects the fundamental  difference between assessing chronic environmental
contaminant exposure risk and assessing acute MEC explosive hazards.  An explosive hazard
can result in immediate injury or death.  Risks from  MEC explosive hazards are  evaluated as
being either present or not present. If the potential for an encounter with MEC exists, the
potential  that the  encounter may result in death or injury also exists.  Consequently, if MEC is
known or suspected to be present, a munitions response typically will be required. The munitions
response may include  further investigation, cleanup  of MEC through  a removal or remedial
action, including land use controls (LUCs), or LUCs alone. Where a cleanup action for MEC has
occurred, some level of LUCs will  often be required to address the  uncertainty that all MEC
items have  been  found and  removed from the MRS.   These may range  from  educational
programs to restrictions on land use activities.
The MEC HA addresses human health and safety concerns associated with potential exposure to
MEC at MRS. It  does  not directly address environmental or ecological concerns that might be
associated with MEC.  It does  not  address operational  ranges.  It does not address locations
where military munitions are known or suspected to be present underwater, nor does it address
chemical warfare materiel (CWM).
Executive Summary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                 Page xiii

The MEC HA is conducted through the systematic planning process that guides environmental
investigations. As such, it is designed to be a collaborative process that draws upon the collective
understanding and expertise of a project team consisting of lead agency personnel,  regulators,
and stakeholders.
The MEC HA is structured around three components of potential explosive hazard incidents:

•   Severity, which is the potential consequences of the effect (e.g., death, injury) on a human
    receptor should an MEC item detonate.

•   Accessibility, which is the likelihood that a human receptor will be able to come in contact
    with a MEC item.

•   Sensitivity, which is the likelihood that a human receptor will be able to interact with a MEC
    item such that it will detonate.
Each of these components is assessed in the MEC HA by input factors. Each input factor has two
or more categories.  Each input factor category is associated with a numeric score that reflects
the relative contributions of the different input factors to the MEC hazard assessment. The MEC
HA scores should not be interpreted as quantitative measures of explosive hazard. The sum of
the input factor scores falls  within one of four defined ranges, called Hazard Levels. Each of the
four Hazard Levels reflects attributes that describe groups of MRS and site conditions ranging
from the highest to lowest hazards.
The MEC HA allows a project team to assess MRS on the most appropriate scale by dividing an
MRS  into subunits, if necessary. The MEC HA can be used to score an MRS  several times to
assess current conditions and the conditions expected after completion of different removal or
remedial  actions.  It can also be used  to  assess different types  of determined or reasonably
anticipated future  land use activities.  The scoring  tool  is contained in  Appendix A  as an
automated workbook.
The MEC HA can be used at several  points in the CERCLA process. It is primarily designed to
be used at two points in the CERCLA  process. The end  of a removal  investigation to assess
baseline explosive hazards and relative hazard reductions associated with removal alternatives in
an  Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis  (EE/CA) report;  or at  the  end   of a remedial
investigation to assess baseline explosive hazards and relative hazard reductions associated with
remedial  alternatives in the Remedial  Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) report.
The MEC HA does not answer the question of "How clean is clean?"  Several removal or
remedial   alternatives or combinations  of alternatives (e.g.,  surface  or  subsurface  cleanup
combined with land  use controls) may be able to meet the protection of human health and  the
environment  criteria.  All  alternatives   are  analyzed to  determine  which  combination  of
alternatives best meets the CERCLA statutory requirements.  Site-specific project teams will
determine "How clean is  clean?" by selecting  the  alternative to be  implemented to  meet
CERCLA requirements.
Executive Summary

-------
                                                                            MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                    October 2008
                                                                                        Page xiv
This page intentionally left blank.
Executive Summary

-------
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                      Page 1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE
This  chapter  introduces the Munitions and
Explosives  of Concern Hazard Assessment
(MEC HA). It presents an overview of the
background,  purpose,  use,  benefits,  and
integration  of the  MEC
evaluation   of   removal
alternatives   under   the
Environmental  Response,
                MEC HA METHODOLOGY
 HA  into  the
and   remedial
Comprehensive
 Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA).
       Important Terms in This Chapter

Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC)
The term, which distinguishes specific categories of
military munitions that may pose unique explosive
safety risks, may include (1) unexploded ordnance
(UXO); (2) discarded military munitions (DMM); (3)
or munitions constituents (MC) present in high
enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard.

Hazard Assessment (HA)
An HA is the evaluation of existing and potential
conditions at a munitions response site that can lead to
an explosive event when a  member of the general
public (i.e., a receptor) interacts with the item. The
evaluation considers the likelihood and the severity of
the event that may occur.

Munitions Response Area (MRA) and Munitions
Response Site (MRS)
An MRA is any area that is known or suspected to
contain MEC. An MRS is the specific discrete
location within an MRA that is known to require a
munitions response (either  investigation or removal of
munitions items). For example, a former range area
may be an MRA, but only that portion of the range
(e.g., a target area) for which a response action has
been identified would be the MRS.
1.1  Background of the MEC HA
Since the early 1990s, military and  civilian
land managers and the public have been
increasingly   concerned  about  munitions
response decisions at locations that are being
returned to  the  public  through the Base
Realignment and  Closure (BRAC) program
or other land transfer programs. In addition,
ongoing  site  investigations  at  munitions
response   areas  (MRA)   and  munitions
response  sites  (MRS)  demonstrate  that  a
number  of  formerly  used  defense sites
(FUDS) contain munitions and explosives of
concern (MEC).
On March 7, 2000,  the Department  of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) signed the Interim Final Management Principles for Implementing Response
Actions at Closed,  Transferred, and Transferring (CTT)  Ranges. * The principles included a
commitment to implement "a process consistent with CERCLA ... [as the] preferred [regulatory]
mechanism." In 2001,  DoD published management guidance for the CERCLA-based Installation
Restoration Program that established the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP).2 The
management guidance required DoD to establish and maintain an inventory of locations (called
munitions response  sites) other than  operational ranges that contain or are suspected to contain
MEC and required installations to program and budget for MMRP response actions. In 2002, the
National Defense Authorization Act affirmed the MMRP and the need for an  inventory, and
required DoD  to  develop  an  approach  for assigning a relative priority to  each MRS in its
inventory for response actions. This effort resulted in the October 5, 2005 finalization of the
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (Protocol).
1 DoD and EPA. Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferred, and
Transferring (CTT) Ranges (Interim Final), 7 March 2000.
2 Department of Defense, Management Guidance for the Defense Environmental Restoration Program,
ODUSD(I&E), September 2001.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                    Page 2

The CERCLA process for responding to releases or potential releases of hazardous substances,
pollutants or contaminants which is described in the National Contingency Plan (NCP),3 includes
the development of site-specific risk assessments appropriate to the requirements of the site.4
The results of the risk assessment are used to help site managers decide whether a response
action  is required, and to support the risk management decisions that are made through the
remedy evaluation, selection, and implementation process. However, the CERCLA methodology
for human health environmental contaminant risk assessment was  not designed to address
explosive safety  hazards associated  with MEC at  an MRS. The  differences between the
environmental contaminant risk assessment methodology and the MEC HA approach are discussed
in more detail in Section 1.6.
In March 2004, EPA invited Federal agencies and State and Tribal organizations to participate in
an effort to develop  a consensus methodology for the site-specific  assessment of explosive
hazards  associated  with MRS. The  collaborative group  that formed  from this effort, the
Technical Working Group for Hazard Assessment (TWO HA), included representatives from the
DoD, Department of the Interior,  State program  managers from Association  of  State and
Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO), and Tribal Association for Solid
Waste  and Emergency Response (TASWER),5 along with EPA. These organizations provided
personnel to develop this  hazard  assessment  framework and  methodology document. An
executive sponsor committee composed of senior-level  officials from each of the participating
organizations was also established to guide the overall approach.

1.2  Purpose of the MEC HA
The purpose of the MEC HA is twofold:

•  Support the hazard management decision-making process by analyzing site-specific
   information to:

       — Assess existing explosives hazards
       — Evaluate hazard reductions associated with removal and remedial alternatives
       — Evaluate hazard reductions associated with land use activity decisions

•  Support hazard communication:

       — Between members of the project team and among other stakeholders
       — By organizing MRS information in a consistent manner
The MEC HA addresses the NCP direction for site-specific assessment of risks to human health
and the environment.  The MEC HA will help  a project  team  understand the hazards  associated
with a MRS if no action is taken, and to evaluate the hazard reductions associated with removal
or remedial  alternatives. As with  any  CERCLA-based  cleanup process, several different
3 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (more commonly called the National Contingency Plan,
or NCP), 40 CFR 300 et seq.
4 A preamble discussion in the proposed rule and the final rule itself highlight the focus of a risk assessment that is
appropriate to the requirements of the site. 40 CFR 300 (Preamble to NCP, December 21, 1988, page 51425); 40
CFR 430 (b), March 8, 1990, page 8846.
5 The participation of the TASWER in the TWG HA ended with the development of the technical framework for the
MEC HA.  In the summer of 2005, TASWER ceased operations and was therefore unable to participate further in
development of this guidance document.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                   Page 3

alternatives may be protective of human health and the environment. The information collected
for the MEC HA as well as the results can provide input into the CERCLA remedy  evaluation
and selection process.

1.3  Scope and Applicability of the MEC HA
The MEC HA addresses human health and safety concerns associated with potential exposure to
MEC at MRS. It does not directly address environmental or ecological concerns that might be
associated with MEC, including the risks associated with exposure to munitions constituents
(MC) as environmental contaminants. It does not address  operational ranges.  It does not address
locations where military munitions are known or suspected to be present underwater.
The MEC HA assesses the acute hazard presented by the explosive component(s) of military
munitions.  Although military munitions include chemical weapons materiel (CWM), and thus
CWM is MEC, the chemical agent component of the CWM presents a  greater hazard to  human
health than  the  explosive  components of CWM.  Additionally, the  toxic chemical  hazard
presented by the CWM can be calculated by current commonly acceptable methods.  This does
not dismiss the potential explosive hazard associated with many CWM but rather reflects the
recognition that  the greatest risk to human  health from CWM is the  chemical agent, not the
explosive.
The MEC HA does not answer the question of "How clean is clean?" Several alternatives or
combinations  of alternatives (e.g., surface  or subsurface  cleanup  combined with land  use
controls) may  be able to meet the protection of human health and the environment criteria. All
alternatives  are  analyzed to determine which  alternative or  combination  of  alternatives best
meets the CERCLA statutory  requirements. Site-specific project teams will determine  "How
clean is  clean?"  by selecting the  alternative(s)  to  be  implemented to  meet  CERCLA
requirements.  The MEC HA relies on data produced as  a result of  the systematic planning
process (SPP), but does not assess  the quality of that data independent of the  data  quality
objectives (DQOs) established by project teams.

1.4   Benefits of the MEC HA
The  MEC HA will provide substantial benefits at the project team level  (e.g.,  individual
installation or MRS). The application of a consistent methodology will save resources during the
investigation and  decision-making  processes  at MRS.  It  will  foster  communication by
contributing to a common understanding within a project team of the nature of the hazard present
and the options for addressing that hazard.
For project teams, the MEC HA is designed to do the following:

   •   Maximize use of data gathered during development of the Conceptual  Site Model (CSM).
   •   Reduce costs and streamline the hazard evaluation process at MRS because individual
       project teams will not have to develop their own process.
   •   Provide a consistent format and process for multiple MRS. Repeated use of the process
       by project teams, including regulators, will further reduce costs by supporting familiarity
       and ease of oversight.
   •   Promote mutual understanding of technical  issues on the MRS through a collaborative,
       team-based hazard assessment process.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                      Page 4

    •   Focus investigations on key issues that must be addressed to support site-specific
       decisions.
    •   Support the systematic planning process and collaborative decision-making at MRS.
    •   Facilitate site-specific decisions, including evaluation of removal and remedial
       alternatives.
The MEC HA is intended to provide program-level benefits, including the following:

    •   Increased confidence in decision-making through use of a standardized hazard
       assessment.
    •   Improved understanding at the national level of the processes that project teams are using
       to support decisions.
    •   Improved predictability of outcomes — similar MRS, with similar facts, will give similar
       results.
    •   More efficient data compilation at the national level through standardized data gathering
       and analysis.
    •   Ability to provide program support through a standardized approach to training and
       guidance.

1.5  Role of the Protocol and the MEC HA in the CERCLA Process
The relative priority assigned to response activities is to be based on the overall conditions at
each MRS and take into consideration various factors related to safety  and environmental
hazards.  The Protocol is designed to first be applied when sufficient information is available to
populate the data elements in any or all of the  modules. For the Explosive Hazard Evaluation
(EHE) module this information has been collected by DoD at the Site Inspection step.6

The MEC HA has several input factors that are similar to those in  the Protocol  EHE module.
The MEC HA  includes additional  capability to assess the potential effects of removal and
remedial alternatives (e.g.,  surface  cleanup,  subsurface cleanup, or land use controls)  on the
potential explosive hazards at  an MRS. The MEC HA  supports project  teams that are making
hazard management decisions through the CERCLA response process at individual MRS. Table
1-1 compares purposes and applications of the Protocol and the MEC HA.

                  Table 1-1. Comparison Between the Protocol and MEC HA
                    Protocol
                  MEC HA
  •   Description and Purpose:
     -   Is a prioritization tool used to assign each
         MRS in the inventory a relative priority for
         response actions?7
 •   Description and Purpose:
       Is a tool used to compare the effects of
       clean-ups and/or changes to land use on the
       explosive hazard of an MRS (or a subunit of
	an MRS)	
  •   Is applied:
     -   To each MRS
     -   Initially at the preliminary assessment phase
         (unless insufficient data are available).
    Is applied:
     - To each MRS (or a subunit of an MRS)
     - As part of the evaluation of baseline hazards
       and removal alternatives in an engineering
       evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA)	
' 32 CFR Part 179, § 179.5 Page 58030, as published in, Federal Register 70, no. 192 (5 October 2005).
 32 CFR Part 179, § 179.1, Page 58028.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                    Page 5
                 Table 1-1. Comparison Between  the Protocol and MEC HA
                    Protocol
             MEC HA
                                                   - At the conclusion of the remedial
                                                     investigation process and during the
                                                     feasibility study for each alternative to be
                                                     evaluated
     The Protocol is annually reviewed and is
     reapplied8:
         Upon completion of a response action
         When new information is available to update a
         previous evaluation at an MRS or a priority
         that was assigned based on one or two
         modules
         Upon further delineation of an MRA into
         MRS
         To categorize an MRS previously classified as
         "evaluation pending"
Is reapplied:
 - When new information becomes available
 - At removal/remedial action completion
 - At the five-year review
The MEC HA supports the CERCLA process for evaluating both removal and remedial actions.
In the March 7, 2000 Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed,
Transferred,  and Transferring Ranges., DoD  and EPA expressed the preference for  response
actions at MRS follow the CERCLA process.  When the State has the lead in overseeing  a
response action, it  may be conducted under  State Resource Conservation and  Recovery Act
(RCRA) requirements, under other  federally   delegated  authorities,  or  under  other  State
authorities. Because the RCRA corrective action program is conducted similarly to the CERCLA
program, the integration of a hazard assessment under that process will be similar to the process
under CERCLA.

•   The MEC HA is primarily designed to be used at two points in the CERCLA process. The
    end of a removal investigation to assess explosive hazards of current conditions and relative
    hazard reductions associated with removal alternativesin the EE/CA report;  or at the end of a
    remedial investigation to assess baseline explosive hazards and relative hazard reductions
    associated with remedial alternatives in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
    report.  The MEC HA should be viewed as  an iterative and dynamic process. As more
    information about an MRS is gathered, information can be added and the MRS can be
    reassessed with the MEC HA to reflect that current understanding.
Figure 1-1  illustrates the following points in the CERCLA process at which the  MEC  HA can
provide input to project team evaluations and decisions:

•   EE/CA. At the conclusion of a removal investigation, the MEC HA supports the assessment
    of the explosive hazards that would remain if no action were taken. This evaluation of the
    "no action" alternative will help to identify the site conditions and use activities that should
    be addressed by removal alternatives considered in the EE/CA, as well as relative reductions
    in explosive hazards
: 32 CFRPart 179, § 179.5, Page 58031.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                   Page 6

   FS. At the conclusion of a remedial investigation, the MEC HA supports the assessment of
   the explosive hazards that would remain if no action were taken. This evaluation of the "no
   action" alternative will help to identify the site conditions and use activities that should be
   addressed by removal alternatives considered in the RI/FS. The MEC HA also provides an
   assessment of relative hazard reduction associated with remedial action alternatives (surface
   and/or subsurface cleanup, land use controls, or combinations of these alternatives) These
   evaluations are made in the feasibility study of the remedial program through the CERCLA
   nine-criteria analysis.9 For the CERCLA remedial action program, the information collected
   to apply the MEC HA as well as its outputs can provide useful information for several of the
   nine-criteria, including: the protection of human health and the environment, compliance
   with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements  (ARARs), long-term effectiveness,
   short-term effectiveness, implementability, and treatment to reduce mobility, toxicity, or
   volume of the principal threat at the MRS.

   Five-Year Review. The MEC HA allows project teams to evaluate the impact of changes in
   land use activities, the effectiveness of LUCs, and the protectiveness of the remedy. If
   conditions have not changed from completion of the remedial action at the time of the Five
   Year Review, it will not be necessary to rerun the MEC HA as part of the review. If
   conditions have changed, project teams may rerun the MEC HA to evaluate potential changes
   to explosive hazards at the MRS.
' The nine-criteria analysis can be found in the National Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300.430(e)(9)).
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                                                                                                          MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                                                     October 2008
                                                                                                                                                                             Page 7
                                                                                                Feasibility Study
                                                                                              Anal/sis of limited sei
                                                                                              alternatives, including
                                                                                              land use controls
ngineering Evaluation/
   Cost Analysis
 Identify Munitions
 Response Site (MRS)
                                           Remedial Investigation
                                           • Geophysical Survey
  No further
action required
                                                     Is land
                                                    compatible
                                                   with intended
                                                      use?
                                                                             Identity
                                                                            confirmed
                                                                            munitions
                                                                          response sites
                                                                          for alternatives
                                                                            analysis
                                                 Situation
                                                appropriate
                                               to proceed with
                                                 removal
                                                  action?
                                                                                          /Select alternative; \
                                                                                                                                  Response  \
                                                                                                                                   complete  )
                                                                 I  record in decision  r
                                                                 V   document    J
      Situation
     appropriate
   to proceed witti
      removal
      action?
                                                                          Is
                                                                       cleaned
                                                                   up land compatible
                                                                     with intended
                                                                        use?
                                                                                           / Response complete
                                                                                    Yes —J  record in decision
                                                                                           V    document
                                   Implement
                                 removal action
To support EBCA
To stfiport FS and fane criteria analyse
To support five year review evaluation
                                                    This chart highlights points in the
                                                    CERCLA process where it may be
                                                     appropriate to use a MEC HA.
                                                                                                                                                     Fig«1.1-ver-1W6
                             Figure 1-1. Application of the MEC Hazard Assessment During the CERCLA Process
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                   PageS
1.6   Differences Between MEC Hazard Assessment and Environmental Contaminant
   Risk Assessment
The MEC HA has been developed to address the NCP direction to assess site-specific risks to
human health and the  environment.   The MEC HA focuses  on the explosives safety hazards
posed by MEC to human receptors. Risk assessments of environmental contaminant, including
those to assess MC, and the MEC HA require similar site information. However, project teams
should  recognize the  fundamental  difference  between  assessing  chronic  environmental
contaminant exposure risk and assessing acute MEC explosive hazards. These differences drive
the approaches to the structure of the explosives hazard assessment process.
An encounter with MEC  has the potential  to  result in injury  or death.  Direct contact (i.e.
handling) increases the likelihood that an encounter will result in injury or death. No accepted
method exists for establishing the incremental probability for injury or death from an encounter
with MEC.  If the potential for an encounter with MEC exists, the potential that the encounter
will result in death or injury also exists. Consequently, if MEC is known or suspected  to be
present, some response action will be required to address the MEC.
CERCLA environmental contaminant risk assessments evaluate long-term or chronic exposure to
environmental contaminants  released to the environment. Estimates  are made of potential
increases in  carcinogenic  and  non-carcinogenic  risks.  The levels that are considered to be
protective of human health for carcinogens are established using the target risk range of lxlOE-4
to lxlOE-6. A carcinogenic risk of lxlOE-4 equates to one  cancer diagnosis beyond what is
expected in a population of 10,000 people exposed to a certain  environmental contaminant under
certain exposure scenarios.
A MEC hazard assessment and an environmental contaminant risk assessment performed at the
same MRS may have very different results. Unlike environmental contaminants that can migrate
through different media, MEC items are generally stationary  and typically require action by a
human receptor to complete the explosive hazard pathway.  The land use activities that present
the highest potential hazard are those that take place outdoors and involve activities in which
people can come in contact with MEC  items and cause an unintentional  detonation. A major
cause of potential exposure at MRS is intrusive activities. MEC at an MRS with recreational or
agricultural uses involving intrusive  activities, such as camping or tilling soil, may provide a
complete MEC exposure pathway and a may result in a relatively "high" hazard assessment.
These same activities may be of durations that limit exposure to environmental contaminants and
result in a  "low" environmental  contaminant  risk assessment evaluation. Assumptions  about
durations of exposure for environmental contaminant  risk assessments are tied to specific land
uses and play a major role in  determining which land uses present the greatest risk. Residential
land use is  generally considered to be the land use with the highest potential  risk because it is
typically associated with the highest estimates for personal exposure. The land uses with the next
highest risks are typically industrial and commercial, then recreational, followed by agricultural and
open space.  The level of activities that take place where explosives hazards exist may or may not
follow this order.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                   Page 9

1.7  Presence of Critical Infrastructure, Cultural Resources, or Ecological Resources
The MEC HA assesses the explosive hazard to human receptors. Munitions response activities
can pose hazards to infrastructure, cultural resources, or ecological resources. Project teams need
to evaluate  the  potential  for  damage  to  the  resources by specific response activities. This
evaluation includes consideration of location-specific  and action-specific ARARs during the
planning and evaluation of investigations and removal or remedial actions. For removal actions,
this analysis should be included in the  implementability evaluations. For remedial actions, this
should be done as part of the implementability and short-term effectiveness criteria analysis.
The MEC HA addresses the effects of an unintentional detonation and the hazardous fragments it
can produce within a given radii. This distance is represented by an explosive safety quantity-
distance (ESQD) arc.  Project teams must understand that critical infrastructure, and cultural and
ecological resources  within the ESQD arc are vulnerable  unless mitigation  measures are
employed.

1.8  Organization of the MEC HA Methodology Document
The  remainder of this document  provides the  background and  instructions necessary for
successfully  applying  the MEC HA.    Chapter 2,  Understanding the Hazard Assessment
Framework,  describes the input factors,  categories, scores and weighting, and the Hazard Levels.
Chapter 3 discusses the project  team roles and responsibilities for undertaking the MEC HA,
considerations for identifying areas for assessment, and information sources. Chapter 4 describes
the processes for scoring the MEC HA under the specific input factors.   Chapter 5 describes the
outputs of the MEC HA  analysis and  provides guidance  on the integration  of the MEC HA
analysis with the CERCLA removal or remedial alternatives evaluation processes.
Four technical appendices are included  to provide additional information. Appendix A provides
an electronic form of the worksheets as  a tool for project teams to use in completing a MEC HA
evaluation. Appendix B provides an example of a completed MEC HA worksheet and report.
Appendix C presents  frequently asked  questions and answers to those questions.  Appendix  D
provides a technical report on the development of MEC HA scores, weights, and Hazard Levels.
Chapter 1: Introduction

-------
CHAPTER 2: UNDERSTANDING THE
HAZARD ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
This  chapter presents an overview of the
technical framework of the MEC HA.

2.1  Components of Explosive Hazard
The MEC HA  framework is  organized into
three components of explosive hazard,  each
of which is defined in Table 2-1.
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                      Page 10
       Important Terms in This Chapter

Cleanup
Removal or remedial actions or previous clearance activities
in which MEC items were or will be removed from the
surface or subsurface to a specified depth and lateral extent.

Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
The CSM is a description of a site and its environment that
is based on existing knowledge. It describes sources,
pathways, and receptors, and the interactions that link these.
It assists the team in planning, data interpretation, and
communication.
                   Table 2-1. Components of Explosive Hazard in MEC HA
Component of
Explosive Hazard
Severity
Accessibility
Sensitivity
Definition
The potential consequences of the effect (e.g. injury or death) on a human receptor
should a MEC item detonate.
The likelihood that a human receptor will be able to come in contact with a MEC item.
The likelihood that a MEC item will detonate if a human receptor interacts with it.
Organization of the MEC HA into three components reflects the nature of explosive hazard and
information contained in the CSM.

2.2  Elements of the MEC HA
The MEC HA technical framework consists  of three  elements:  input factors,  structure,  and
output. Each of these terms is defined in Table 2-2 and discussed in detail in this chapter.

                        Table 2-2. Framework Elements of the MEC HA
Framework
Element
Input factors
Structure
Output
Definition
A series of factors that describe the characteristics of an MRS in terms of the
the explosive hazard.
The methods used to assign weights, scores, and combine the input factors to
explosive hazard.
components of
assess the MRS
The description of the explosive Hazard Level of the MRS.
2.2.1  MEC HA Input Factors
This section introduces the input factors that are used in the MEC HA. Input factors describe the
conditions at an MRS  that determine the severity, accessibility, and sensitivity components of
explosive hazard.
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page 11

2.2.1.1  Severity
The severity component is described by two input factors related to the potential consequences to
a human receptor should a MEC item detonate:

•  Energetic Material Type

•  Location of Additional Human Receptors
The first factor describes the hazard inherent in the MEC items known or suspected to be at the
MRS. The second factor addresses the possibility that should a MEC item detonate it could affect
one or more secondary human receptors in addition to the initiating human receptor.

2.2.1.2  Accessibility
The accessibility component is described by the following input factors related to the likelihood
that a human receptor will be able to come in contact with an MEC item.
•  Site Accessibility

•  Potential Contact Hours

•  Amount of MEC
•  Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Receptor Intrusive Depth

•  Migration Potential

2.2.1.3  Sensitivity
The sensitivity component is described by the following input factors related to the likelihood
that an MEC item will detonate if a human receptor interacts with it.
•  MEC Classification

•  MEC Size

2.2.2   MEC HA Structure
The MEC HA framework uses a numeric structure to assign weights, scores, and then combine
scores to describe the  hazards associated with MEC at an MRS.  The sum of the numeric scores
determines the Hazard Level. The three characteristics of the MEC HA numeric structure of
weights, scores, and combination are described in Table 2-3.

                Table 2-3. Numeric Structure Characteristics of the MEC HA
Characteristic
Weights
Scores
Combination
Description
The weight assigned to an input factor represents the percentage of the maximum score for that
input factor when compared with the sum of the maximum scores of all input factors. The
different weights for the explosive hazard components are calculated in a similar manner.
Numeric scores are assigned to each of the input factor categories. The difference in scores
reflects greater or lesser relative contributions to the explosive hazards at an MRS.
Scores are summed to produce a final numeric score that determines which of four Hazard
Levels reflects the conditions described by the input factor categories.
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                            MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                    October 2008
                                                                                         Page 12

These characteristics and their relationship  to  the  other characteristics are described in more
detail in the following sections.
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                     Page 13
2.2.2.1   Weights
Weighting of input factors ensures that the MEC HA is
sensitive  enough  to  distinguish  between  different
removal and remedial action alternatives and land use
decisions. Weighting balances the input factors that do
not change and those that do change in response to  a
cleanup, as well  as  the  input factors that change to
describe differences  in land  use  activities.  Weighting
also reflects the NCP preference for active cleanups.
This preference is reflected in the scoring by assigning
a higher relative weight to cleanup actions than is given
to changes  in land use and land  use activities.  In addition, the scoring reflects the CERCLA
statutory preference  for  treatment of the  principal  threat at  a  site.  Table 2-4  presents  the
maximum scores and corresponding weights assigned to each input factor.

               Table 2-4. Input Factor Maximum Scores and Resulting Weights
   CERCLA Statutory Preference for
           Active Cleanup
The implementation regulation for
CERCLA, the National Contingency Plan,
states: "The use of institutional controls
shall not substitute for active response
measures (e.g., treatment and/or
containment...) as the sole remedy unless
such active measures are determined not to
be practicable." 40 CFR 300.430(a)(iii)(D)
Explosive Hazard
Component
Severity
Input Factor
Energetic Material Type
Location of Additional Human Receptors
Component total
Accessibility
Site Accessibility
Total Contact Hours
Amount of MEC
Minimum MEC Depth/Maximum Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
Component total
Sensitivity
MEC Classification
MEC Size
Component total
Total Score
Maximum
Scores
100
30
130
80
120
180
240
30
650
180
40
220
1,000
Weights
10%
3%
73%
8%
12%
18%
24%
3%
65%
18%
4%
22%
100%
Appendix D contains an in depth discussion and  analysis of the development of the scores,
weights, and Hazard Levels for the MEC HA methodology.
2.2.2.2   Scores
Table 2-5 contains the MEC HA scores.   The maximum possible total score is 1000 and the
minimum possible total  score is 125.  The scores are organized into rows for each input factor
category, and columns that reflect site conditions or cleanup status.
The input factor categories are intended  to  describe site-specific conditions. MEC HA users
select the category for each input factor that best represents the site conditions being evaluated.
These categories may change as different  land use activities are assessed, or as cleanup actions
are assessed. The input factor category determines the row from which the score is selected.
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 14

There  are three different columns to assess  different  removal or remedial alternatives. The
"Baseline Condition" column is  selected for  any set of site conditions that do not include a
cleanup alternative. This will typically be the current conditions at the MRS, which may include
a historical cleanup, but can also be applied to evaluate changes to land use activities, including
those associated with the application of LUCs as a remedial action.  The "Surface Cleanup"
column is selected when evaluating a removal or remedial alternative involving surface  clean-up
of MEC. If the  alternative  under evaluation  involves subsurface  clean-up, then scores  are
selected from the "Subsurface Clean-up" column. Scoring is discussed in more detail in Chapter
4.

                        Table 2-5. Scores for Input Factor Categories
Input Factor
Energetic Material Type
Location of Additional
Human Receptors
Site Accessibility
Potential Contact Hours
Amount of MEC
Input Factor Category
High Explosives and Low
Explosive Fillers in Fragmenting
Rounds
White Phosphorus
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting Charge
Incendiary
Inside the MRS or inside the
ESQD arc surrounding the MRS
Outside of the ESQD arc
Full Accessibility
Moderate Accessibility
Limited Accessibility
Very Limited Accessibility
Many Hours
Some Hours
Few Hours
Very Few Hours
Target Area
Open Burning/Open Detonation
(OB/OD) Area
Function Test Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver Areas
Firing Points
Safety Buffer Areas
Storage
Explosive-Related Industrial
Facility
Score
Baseline
Condition
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
120
70
40
15
180
180
165
140
115
75
30
25
20
Surface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
90
50
20
10
120
110
90
140
15
10
10
10
10
Subsurface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
30
20
10
5
30
30
25
10
5
5
5
5
5
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                    Page 15
                        Table 2-5. Scores for Input Factor Categories
Input Factor
Minimum MEC Depth
Relative to the Maximum
Receptor Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
MEC Classification
MEC Size
Input Factor Category
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
does not overlap with subsurface
MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with minimum MEC
depth
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth does
not overlap with minimum MEC
depth
Possible
Unlikely
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk Explosives
Small
Large
Score
Baseline
Condition
240
240
150
50
30
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
Surface
Cleanup
150
50
N/A*
N/A*
30
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
Subsurface
Cleanup
95
25
95
25
10
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
*N/A - Not Applicable:  Surface cleanups for MEC would not be appropriate for site conditions where MEC
in the subsurface.
is all
2.2.3  Outputs from the MEC HA Scoring
Each scenario assessed by the MEC HA produces a score that is associated with one  of four
Hazard Levels. These Hazard Levels reflect the interaction between the current or future human
activities in an MRS, and the types, amounts, and conditions of MEC items within the MRS.

•   Table 2-6 contains the Hazard Level ranges. The ranges for each of the Hazard Levels are
    based on the results of a large number of sensitivity runs designed to ensure that the
    appropriate site conditions are associated with each Hazard Level. A summary of the
    sensitivity runs are contained in Appendix D.
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                    Page 16
                           Table 2-6. Hazard Level Scoring Ranges
Hazard Level
1
2
O
4
Maximum MEC HA
Score
1,000
835
720
525
Minimum MEC HA
Score
840
725
530
125
Chapter 2: Understanding the Hazard Assessment Framework

-------
                                                                    MEC HA Methodology
                                                                            October 2008
                                                                                Page 17
CHAPTER 3: SCOPING THE HAZARD ASSESSMENT
This chapter  describes how to  conduct a MEC  HA. The MEC HA consists of four steps:
planning, compiling, implementing, and documenting. This chapter provides general information
to consider when identifying the area or areas for assessment.  This chapter begins by outlining
the role of the project team in conducting the MEC HA

3.1 Project Team
•  A project team includes the group of organizations and disciplines within those organizations
   responsible for planning and executing response actions. The make-up of a project team
   varies, but it often includes the lead agency Project Manager, regulatory authorities (e.g.,
   U.S. EPA and/or the State or Tribal agency), land owner/manager, technical experts and
   support staff associated with the lead agency and the regulatory authorities, and supporting
   contractors and consultants.  Table 3-1 shows the likely project team members for different
   types of MRS.
           Table 3-1. Potential Project Team Members for Common Types of MRS
     TypeofMRS(a)
Potential Project Team Members
    National
    Priorities List
DoD personnel or other agency personnel
Installation environmental manager

Service organization personnel, such as Air Force Center for
Environmental Excellence (AFCEE), U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE), or Naval Facilities Engineering Command
(NAVFAC)

DoD Explosives Safety Activities

Federal land management agency

State or Tribal regulatory agency

U.S. EPA
    Formerly Used
    Defense Site
DoD FUDS manager (USACE), DoD Safety Components

Federal land management agency (if involved)

State or Tribal regulatory agency

U.S. EPA (if involved)

Private landowners or owners representatives

Local government representatives
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                     MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 18
           Table 3-1. Potential Project Team Members for Common Types of MRS
     TypeofMRS(a)
Potential Project Team Members
 •  Base
    Realignment and
    Closure
DoD
Closing base environmental manager
Service BRAC program offices
DoD Explosives Safety Activities
Federal land management agency
State or Tribal regulatory agency
Federal landowning agency (if involved)
U.S. EPA
Local land reuse authority
 •  Non-NPL
DoD personnel or other agency personnel
Installation environmental manager
Service organization personnel (e.g., AFCEE, USAGE,
NAVFAC)
DoD Explosives Safety Activities
Federal land management agency
State or Tribal regulatory agency
U.S. EPA (if involved)
(a) Much of this discussion is focused on DoD sites. MEC may exist on facilities or sites owned
or managed by other Federal agencies (e.g., Department of Agriculture, Department of the
Interior) or private entities. This methodology is appropriate to those sites, and the nature of the
project team membership will reflect that ownership or management.
•  Lead Agency. Personnel from the lead agency typically  will compile the data necessary to
   conduct the assessment, assemble the data into the data collection forms, and conduct the
   scoring. It is most likely that these individuals will analyze the munitions-related data  and
   provide the information necessary to conduct various calculations.
•  Regulatory Agency. Personnel from  the regulatory agencies help to  determine whether the
   quantity and quality of data is sufficient to make required hazard management decisions.
•  Others.  Current and prospective land owners and land users will ensure that the MEC  HA
   accurately reflects the current  and determined or reasonably anticipated future  land  use
   activities.
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                    Page 19

3.2 Outreach
Public  participation  is  required  throughout the  CERCLA  process.10  Specific  CERCLA
requirements ensure that the public has the opportunity to review key documents leading to the
identification of removal or remedial alternatives. Community acceptance is one of the CERCLA
nine criteria used in the evaluation and selection of a remedial alternative. Finally, all documents
that support the site evaluation and decision process must be part of the administrative record  for
CERCLA response actions and must be available to the public.11
The  project team should keep  all stakeholders  informed of the MEC HA deliberations and
results.  Restoration Advisory Boards, local government  officials,  and other parties should be
provided opportunities to learn  about the overall hazard  assessment process. In addition, they
should  be  offered information  about the  assumptions used in data evaluation and  given  an
opportunity to  discuss their concerns and issues concerning  the  hazard assessment process.
Stakeholders should be provided the opportunity to learn  about the cleanup alternatives that are
evaluated by the MEC HA and addressed in the CERCLA  removal and remedial evaluations.

3.3 Overview of the  MEC HA
Figure 3-1  provides an overview of the MEC HA implementation. Each step is described in more
detail in the following sections.
3.3.1   Planning the MEC HA
The MEC HA is an element in the SPP. The SPP is based
on  collaborative  decision-making.  The  project  team
should represent all the appropriate organizations  (e.g.,
the lead and support agencies, stakeholders,  etc.) and
needs  the  right mix  of disciplines. These disciplines
should include project managers, explosive safety experts,
MEC  cleanup  specialists, geophy si cists,  environmental
engineers,   planning   specialists,   quality   assurance
managers, and community involvement coordinators.
Systematic Planning Process (SPP)
SPP is a systematic, objective approach to
planning and executing an environmental
investigation. An SPP uses a
collaborative team-based approach to
planning an environmental investigation.
The U.S. EPA Data Quality Objectives
process and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineer Technical Project Planning
(TPP) process are examples of SPP.
10 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, PL 99-499, Section 117.
11 40 CFR 300.800 etseq.
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                                 MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                           October 2008
                                                                                                                                                Page 20
                                                       Compiling
                                                                                                             Implementing
                                                                                      Documenting
                                                                                                                                              Document Process
                                                                                                                                              for Project Team,
                                                                                                                                               Regulators, and
                                                                                                                                                Stakeholders
Project Team
Agreement on
   Data,
Assumptions,
 Alternatives
Project Team
Agreement on
   Data,
Assumptions,
 Alternatives
                                             Figure 3-1. Overview of Hazard Assessment Process
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 21

The two critical planning tasks for the project team are to clearly identify the areas that are to be
assessed, and develop the DQOs for the information that will be used to conduct the MEC HA.

3.3.2   Identifying the Area to be Assessed
This section describes the process of identifying the MRS or a subset of the MRS on which the
MEC HA will be conducted.
The area being assessed by the MEC HA is referred to as a MRS. MRS is defined as  a discrete
location that is known to  require a  munitions response. The boundaries of the MRS may have
been  defined for  a variety  of reasons,  including  investigation  efficiencies,  funding, or
programmatic (e.g.,  contracting) reasons.  Within an MRS,  subunits may  differ widely with
respect to the explosive hazards they pose because of the different past munitions uses,  as well as
different land use activities within the MRS. Attachment 3A to this chapter provides an example
of delineating  areas for assessment.
The following are specific considerations for delineating the area to be assessed by the MEC
HA:

•   Boundaries must be clear.
•   Boundaries should outline an area of a single past munitions-related activity, such as a target
    area or an area where open burning/open detonation (OB/OD) occurred.
•   Boundaries should separate areas in which different types of munitions were used, if
    possible.
•   Boundaries should delineate areas of similar land use activities (for both current and
    determined or reasonably anticipated future land uses).
It may be beneficial to subdivide  an MRS into subunits for the purposes  of conducting the MEC
HA where there are variations in current land use activities, determined or reasonably anticipated
future land use activities, or  in site access. For example, if a range safety fan of a large MRS has
multiple current or future land use activities within its  borders, it may be  most efficient to
subdivide that MRS into smaller areas, analyzing each unit on the basis of its specific land use.
Accurate maps provide the best portrayal of the area to be assessed. Maps should  contain
information  such as the past munitions use, boundaries of that use, and any features or buildings
where people  may congregate (e.g., athletic fields, picnic  areas,  cultural resources, or inhabited
buildings). Physical features that can affect the accessibility of the MRS such as streams or hills
should be clearly marked, as should manmade features such as fences or other barriers. Ground
cover, such  as heavy undergrowth or marshy areas that could affect accessibility or movement
through the  area,  should also be indicated.  The map should be geo-referenced  using appropriate
global positioning equipment that have the  level of precision and accuracy (e.g., plus or minus x
meters) agreed to by the project team.

3.3.3   Compiling Information
The team must gather the information required for the input factors. The information  will be
derived from  a variety of sources.  Much of the information  may already  have been gathered
during the preparation of the CSM and in previous site investigations.
A MEC HA requires information concerning the following:
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                      Page 22

    •   Prior military munitions use
    •   Past military activities
    •   Past munitions response activities (e.g., time critical removal actions, surface removals)
       or explosives  or munitions  emergency  responses performed by explosive ordnance
       disposal (EOD) personnel
    •   Current site conditions (e.g., land use activities, access)
    •   Determined or reasonably  anticipated future land use (e.g., future land use activities,
       response alternatives)
After gathering  all the necessary information,  the project  team  will  select the appropriate
category from each input factor. Depending on the available information, the team may need to
make assumptions about certain characteristics of the MRS. The decisions associated with the
information should reflect  a  team  consensus and be  clearly documented  in the MEC  HA
worksheets.
Most of the information needed  to conduct MEC HA  will be available  from  site-specific
documents developed during CERCLA response activities,  and will not need  to be collected
specifically for the MEC HA. Table  3-2 describes the types of information that are required for
the MEC HA, and identifies likely  sources of that information.
                     Table 3-2. Required Types of Data and Likely Sources
     Type of Information
Input Factors/Purpose of Data
       Sources of Data
   Site description and
   boundaries
•  Define area to be assessed
Historical research reports such as
Archive Search Report
Aerial photography and interpretation
reports
Past action reports from removal
actions or clearances
Preliminary Assessment/Site
Investigation (PA/SI) reports
EE/CA reports
RI/FS reports
RCRA Facility Investigation/
Corrective Measure Study (RFI/CMS)
reports
CSM from investigations
Base master plans (active bases)
Reuse plans (BRAC facilities)
Community land use plans	
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                 MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                          October 2008
                                                                                               Page 23
                       Table 3-2. Required Types of Data and Likely Sources
      Type of Information
Input Factors/Purpose of Data
        Sources of Data
   Site physical conditions
•   Site accessibility
•   Migration potential
PA/SI reports
EE/CA reports
RI/FS reports
RFI/CMS reports
CSM from investigations (e.g., PA/SI,
EE/CA, RI/FS)
Environmental Condition of Property
or Environmental Baseline Survey
reports (BRAC)
Current and historical aerial
photography
Base master plans (active bases)
Reuse plans (BRAC facilities)
Community land use plans (including
zoning)
U.S. Geological Survey topographic
maps	
   Past munitions-related
   activities
    Energetic Material Type
    Location of Additional
    Human Receptors
    Amount of MEC
    Minimum MEC Depth
    Relative to the Maximum
    Intrusive Depth
    Migration Potential
    MEC Classification
    MEC Size
Historical research reports such as
Archive Search Reports
Unit histories, EOD response reports
Aerial photography and interpretation
reports
Explosives Safety Submission (ESS)
or Explosives Siting Plan (ESP)
PA/SI reports
EE/CA reports
RI/FS reports
RFI/CMS reports
CSM from investigations
Past removal after-action reports
Site interviews
   Current, Determined, and
   Reasonably Anticipated
   Future Land Use Activities
    Location of Additional
    Human Receptors
    Site Accessibility
    Potential Contact Hours
    Minimum MEC Depth
    Relative to the Maximum
    Intrusive Depth
Base master plans (active bases)
Reuse plans (BRAC facilities)
Community land use plans (e.g.,
county zoning data, census data, and
physical observations)
Land ownership maps from local tax
records
ESS or ESP
PA/SI reports
EE/CA reports
RI/FS reports
RFI/CMS reports
CSM from investigations (e.g., PA/SI,
EE/CA, RI/FS)
Information obtained from Federal,
local,  or regional land-holding
agencies on outdoor recreation use
(quantity and type)	
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page 24
                    Table 3-2. Required Types of Data and Likely Sources
     Type of Information
Input Factors/Purpose of Data
       Sources of Data
                                                        Information obtained from Tribal
                                                        governments	
   Removal or remedial
   alternatives
   Energetic Material Type
   Location of Additional
   Human Receptors
   Site Accessibility
   Potential Contact Hours
   Amount of MEC
   Minimum MEC Depth
   Relative to the Maximum
   Intrusive Depth
   MEC Classification
CSM from investigations
Past removal action reports and
associated documentation
ESS or ESP
PA/SI reports
EE/CA reports
RI/FS reports
RFI/CMS reports
Two widely available documents that provide sources of information useful in supporting data
gathering are Munitions Response Historical  Records Review published  by the Interstate
Technology and Regulatory Council's UXO Team (November 2003) and EPA Handbook on the
Management of Munitions Response Actions (May 2005, Interim Final). These documents can be
downloaded            from            http://www.itrcweb.org/gd UXO.asp           and
http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/documents/munitions.htm , respectively.

3.3.4   Implementing
Once the MRS data have been gathered, the team can then score the MRS. The team enters data
into an automated workbook which then arranges the data into scoring  sheets for each set of
MRS conditions.  The worksheets calculate separate scores for each scenario  identified by the
project team.  The team can compare the relative hazard  of different scenarios and compare
various cleanup  actions or land use  activity  changes on  the  hazard  level. The  electronic
worksheets are located in Appendix A.

3.3.5   Documenting
The project team must document the MEC HA for the administrative record. The documentation
may be part of a larger document (e.g., RI/FS report) or it may be a stand-alone document. The
automated workbook will produce a series of report tables  documenting the inputs and outputs.
The project  team must add further information to these tables,  including  the  sources  of
information and the rationales for any assumptions.

The MEC HA worksheets contain fields to document the basis for  the information used in the
MEC HA. These fields must be filled in for all information and should describe the following:

    •   The specific data that are the basis of the category selection (e.g., the mark or model of
       the munitions that is used to determine Energetic Material Type)
    •   Sources of information (e.g., PA/SI, EE/CA, RI/FS, reuse plans, etc.)
    •   Qualitative descriptions of the uncertainty associated with the information
    •   Descriptions of assumptions made in the absence of hard information or in the presence
       of uncertainty
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 25

3.4  Data Quality Issues

Data  quality impacts  all aspects of the MEC HA.  Concerns  about data  quality will vary
depending on the phase  of the investigation and the  sources of information. Table 3-3 briefly
describes data quality issues associated with different sources of information.

                    Table 3-3. Data Quality of Different Information Sources
Source of Data
Archive Search Report or other
historical research
Investigation results (EE/CA, RI)
Removal or remedial action reports
Data Quality Issues
• Completeness of historical research information; gaps in time and
types of information available
• Accuracy of information about past clearances
• Completeness of investigation
• Depth to which sensors could detect the items of concern
• Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) associated with the
investigation
• Match between area investigated and MRS (or portion of MRS) to be
evaluated through MEC HA process
• Sufficiency of information to bound the area to be evaluated by the
MEC HA
• Detection technology used and the quality control (geophysical prove
out) processes used.
• For subsurface clean-ups, process and criteria used in identifying
anomalies that were dug and those that were not
It is important to keep in mind that  some level of uncertainty exists with any environmental
investigation.  Realistic but conservative assumptions can reduce uncertainty.  For example, it
may be appropriate to assume MEC is still present on the surface at an MRS where there was a
historic surface clearance with little documentation.  A thorough discussion about the nature of
any uncertainty and its effect on the selection of MEC  HA input factor categories will be an
important part of the collaborative decision making process.
Chapter 3: Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 26

Attachment 3A. Examples of Dividing an MRS for a MEC HA Evaluation
The following example shows how MRSs may be divided into subunits, depending on their past
munitions use and current, determined or reasonably anticipated future land use activities.
Figure 3A-1 shows the MRA as containing three MRSs, before they are subdivided:

•  MRS-1 - An indirect fire range, including the firing point, range safety fan, target area, and
   an OB/OD area
•  MRS-2 - A buffer area around the range safety fan
•  MRS-3 - A former maneuver area
Figure 3A-2  shows the same MRA once it has been subdivided. MRS-1 has been divided into
four subunits, labeled MRS l(a) through MRS l(d), based on past military munitions activities.
The firing point, range  safety fan,  target  area, and OB/OD area are  each treated as separate
assessment areas.  This is because each area is expected to have different amounts and conditions
of munitions, and therefore have different MEC HA Hazard Levels. MRS-2  is assessed in its
entirety,  because the past military  uses, the current use, and the future  use are all uniform
throughout the MRS. MRS-3 is a former maneuver area that had one past military use and one
current use. It is separated into two hazard assessment areas labeled MRS  3(a) and MRS  3  (b)
because it has different reasonably anticipated future land use activities.
Chapter 3:  Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                                              MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                                         October 2008
                                                                                                                                                               Page 27
MRS 2 Buffer Area
Current Use: Open Space
Future Use: Camping and Hiking Area
                              MRS 2 Buffer Area
                              Current Use: Open Space
                              Future Use: Camping and Hiking Area
                                  MRS1
                                  Firing Point and Range
                                  Safety Fan Including Target
                                  Areas and OB/OD
                                  Current Use: Open Space
                                  Future Use: Camping and
                                  Hiking
                                                              MRS 3
                                                              Maneuver Area
Current Use: Open Space
 Future Use: Residential
                                                           Current Use: Open Space
                                                            Future Use: Ball Fields.
                                                               Picnicking Area
               Figure 3A-1.  Munitions Response Area
                         Containing Three MRS
                              Range Safety Fan
                              MRS 1(b)
MRS1
Current Use: Open Space,
Future Use: Camping and
 MRS 3(a)
t Use: Open S
 Use: Residential
  Area
                                                                                             MRS 3(b)
                                                                                             Use: Open Space
                                                                                        Future Use: Ball Fields.
                                                                                           Picnicking Area
                                   Figure 3A-2. MRS Subdivided for Assessment Purposes
Chapter 3:  Scoping the Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 28
CHAPTER 4: INPUT FACTORS AND SCORING
This chapter describes the selection and  scoring of input factor categories.  The  input factor
categories are used to describe site-specific conditions. Project teams select the category for each
of the nine input factors that best represents the site conditions being evaluated. These categories
may change as different land use activities are assessed.  Sections 4.1 through 4.9 describe how
to select the appropriate input factor category for scoring current, determined,  or reasonably
anticipated future land uses, and different removal or remedial alternatives.
Tables in the nine sections also provide scores for the input factors. The input factor categories
determine the rows which contain the applicable scores.  The tables have three columns of scores
to assess different removal or  remedial cleanup action alternatives. The "Baseline Condition"
column is selected for any  set of site conditions that do not include a clean-up alternative. This
will typically be the current conditions at the MRS, which can reflect a historical cleanup,  but
can also be used to evaluate changes to land use activities, including those associated with the
application of LUCs as a  remedial action.  The "Surface Cleanup" column is selected  when
evaluating a removal or remedial  alternative involving surface clean-up.  If the alternative under
evaluation involves subsurface clean-up, then scores are selected from the "Subsurface Cleanup"
column.
The MEC  HA addresses the residual uncertainty of surface and subsurface cleanup.  Current
methods for detecting,  discriminating,  and removing MEC cannot  ensure that all MEC  are
removed during a cleanup.  12 Detection of MEC  is a function of size, depth, and orientation of
the object. In general, small MEC is more difficult to detect at depth than larger MEC. The MEC
HA scores address this residual uncertainty by not reducing scores in several of the input factor
categories in the "Surface Cleanup" and "Subsurface Cleanup" columns.
Project teams must determine  the type  and amount of QA/QC measures to ensure that  the
cleanup actions are being carried out in accordance with the site-specific requirements.
The final sections of this chapter discuss general issues to consider  when scoring the MEC HA,
and present a table that summarizes all the input factor scores.

4.1  Energetic Material Type
The type of energetic material is the primary determinant of the severity of the explosive hazard.
The six categories for the Energetic Material Type input factor are in Table 4-1. The project team
must use the type with the highest score that is known or suspected to be present. Energetic
material types are grouped by both their characteristics and inherent explosive hazard. Categories
associated with greater relative explosive hazards are listed first.
12 The exception is to this would be where all soil is removed beyond the maximum depth for the MEC, or down to
bedrock.  Under these conditions, there should be little or no uncertainty that all MEC have been removed.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                                   MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                            October 2008
                                                                                                 Page 29
                    Table 4-1. Input Factor Categories: Energetic Material Type
Category
High
explosives
and low
explosive
filler in
fragmenting
rounds
White
phosphorus
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting
charge
Incendiary
Category Description
High explosive (HE) fillers, including bulk
explosives and cased munitions filled with
compounds such as TNT, tetryl, RDX, and HMX.
Fragmenting rounds filled with low explosive fillers
(generally black powder) are also included in this
category.
A bursting smoke filler that burns rapidly when
exposed to oxygen. Skin contact can cause burns.
Used to send signals, illuminate areas of interest,
simulate other weapons during training, and as
ignition elements for certain weapons. Pyrotechnics
produce heat but less gas than explosives or
propellants.
Compositions used to propel projectiles and rockets
and to generate gases for powering auxiliary devices.
Low explosive or pyrotechnic fillers designed to
produce a flash and smoke when detonated,
providing observers or spotters a visual reference of
munitions impact.
Any flammable material that is used as filler in
munitions intended to destroy a target by fire.
Required Information
. Mark or model of munition (cased
munitions)
• Type of filler (cased munition)
• Type of explosive (bulk explosives)
                    Energetic Material Type Categories: Rationale for Hazard Order
  Categories are listed in decreasing order of the severity of anticipated hazards, as follows:

  •   High explosives are characterized by a very rapid rate of decomposition and detonation. They produce
      fragments that move out from the detonation at a rapid rate. Low explosive fragmenting rounds combust at
      a slower rate. They are combined with high explosives for the purpose of the MEC HA categories when
      contained in cased munitions that fragment when they detonate. Although high explosive rounds detonate
      more rapidly, both are likely to throw fragments that may present a hazard to people.
  •   White phosphorus (WP) is ranked next in hazard. It is very dangerous to come into contact with and
      ignites when exposed to air. Munitions containing WP also contain a high-explosive burster that is
      designed to split the case and throw WP over the surrounding area.
  •   Pyrotechnics are designed to produce smoke and an audible signal during training. In general, they are not
      fragment-producing munitions. Certain pyrotechnic devices, such as grenade simulators, contain
      photoflash powder.
  •   Propellants contain low explosives  to propel projectiles, rockets, etc. Propellants are more likely to burn
      than to explode, and they are ranked as less hazardous than WP because they do not typically produce
      fragments. They are normally consumed as they propel the projectile or rocket to the target.
  •   Spotting charges are generally low  explosives or smoke-producing compounds and are designed to
      produce smoke, not fragmentation.  They are often a fraction of the net explosive weight of the live round.
      Although spotting charges are generally ranked as low hazards, spotting charges that contain high
      explosives are scored in the high explosive category.
  •   Incendiaries are designed to burn structures, materials, or areas. They are typically filled with burning
      agents such as thickened  fuels and metallic filings.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 30

4.1.1   Scores for Energetic Material Type Categories

Table 4-2 shows the scores assigned for each category within the Energetic Material Type input
factor. The score for this  input factor  does not change with  cleanup to address residual
uncertainty.

                   Table 4-2. Scores for Energetic Material Type Categories
Input
Factor
Energetic
Material
Type
Category or Value
High explosives and low
explosive filler in fragmenting
rounds
White phosphorus
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting charge
Incendiary
Score
Baseline
Condition
100
70
60
50
40
30
Surface MEC
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
Subsurface MEC
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
4.1.2   Category Changes for Energetic Material Type
The only time the category chosen for  Energetic  Material  Type will change is  when new
information indicates that the selected category is incorrect.
4.2 Location of Additional Human Receptors
It is possible that additional human receptors, beyond
the individual who causes an item to detonate, may be
exposed to overpressure and/or fragmentation hazards
from the detonation of MEC. This factor requires the
project team to identify if places where people might
congregate  are  located  either within  the  MRS  or
within the ESQD arc.  To address uncertainties about
the MEC locations, a conservative  approach is to
extend the ESQD arc from the edge of the MRS. Two
sources  for the ESDQ arc are the Explosives Siting
Plan or the Explosives Safety Submission. Table 4-3
contains the two categories for the Location of Additional Human Receptors input factor.
   Places People Might Congregate
The following are examples of places
where people might congregate:

•  Athletic fields
•  Picnic areas
•  Campgrounds
•  Cultural resource or sacred areas
•  Fishing or hunting camps
•  Inhabited buildings
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                     MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 31

        Table 4-3. Input Factor Categories: Location of Additional Human Receptors
Category
Inside the MRS or inside
the ESQD arc surrounding
the MRS
Outside of the ESQD arc
Category Description
Places where people might
congregate are located within the
MRS or within the ESQD arc
established for the MRS.
There are no places where people
might congregate within the MRS or
within the ESQD arc.
Required Information
• Boundary of the MRS (area to be
assessed) or hazard assessment
area
• Specific location of features or
facilities that attract people to
locations potentially on or near
MRS boundaries
. The ESQD arc from either the
ESS or the ESP
A project team selects the appropriate category for this input factor as follows:

   •   If people congregate at places within the MRS, then the category for this input factor is
       "Inside of the MRS or inside the ESQD arc surrounding the MRS."
   •   If people congregate at places outside of the MRS boundaries, but within the ESQD arc
       then the category for this input factor will be "Inside the MRS or inside the ESQD arc
       surrounding the MRS".
   •   If people are not within the MRS and not within the ESQD arc, then the category for this
       input factor is "Outside of the ESQD arc."
Figure 4-1 illustrates how the distance of potential  receptors from the boundary of the MRS
could be determined.

4.2.1   Scores for Location of Additional Human Receptors Categories
Scores for these categories are  provided in Table 4-4. The scores for these categories do not
change with cleanup because clean-up does not impact the presence or absence of places where
people might congregate.
          Table 4-4. Scores for Location of Additional Human Receptors Categories
Input Factor
Location of Additional
Human Receptors
Category or Value
Inside the MRS or inside the ESQD arc
surrounding the MRS
Outside of the ESQD arc
Score
Baseline
Condition
30
0
Surface
MEC
Cleanup
30
0
Subsurface
MEC
Cleanup
30
0
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                        Picnic Area or Camp Site
                                       (inside the ESQD Arc)
                                                 Potential     \
                                                 Explosive Event
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 32
                                                                      Boundary of MRS
                                                                /«— ESQD Arc
                                                               /      (e.g., 1800 feet)
                                               Ball Field
                                               (outside the ESQD Arc)
              5-1 ver Ocl-06
                     Figure 4-1. Location of Additional Human Receptors
4.2.2   Category Changes for Location of Additional Human Receptors
The category for this input factor should change if planned changes to land use add or remove a
feature or facility where people will congregate. If there is currently such a feature or facility in
the MRS or within the ESQD arc, and removal of the facility or feature is planned, then the input
factor for this category should be  changed from "Inside the MRS  or  inside the ESQD arc
surrounding the MRS" to "Outside of the ESQD arc"  when applying the MEC HA to the planned
land use. If there is no feature or facility to attract people in the MRS boundary or within the
ESQD arc,  but future plans include the addition of such a feature, then the input factor category
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                    Page 33

should be changed from "Outside the ESQD arc" to "Inside the MRS  or inside the ESQD arc
surrounding the MRS" when assessing the planned land use.

4.3  Site Accessibility

The  Site Accessibility input factor describes the ease with which people  can access an MRS.
This differs from the Potential Contact Hours input factor, which describes the total number of
hours associated  with MRS users' participation in planned  activities on the MRS. Table 4-5
contains the four categories for the Site Accessibility input factor.

                     Table 4-5. Input Factor Categories: Site Accessibility
Category
Full accessibility
Moderate
accessibility
Limited
accessibility
Very limited
accessibility
Category Description
A site with no barriers to entry,
including sites with signage but no
fencing.
A site with some barriers to entry, such
as barbed wire fencing or rough terrain.
A site with significant barriers to entry,
such as unguarded chain-link fences or
requirements for special transportation
(e.g., boats or all-terrain vehicles) to
reach the site.
A site with guarded chain-link fences,
or terrain that requires special skills
and equipment (e.g., mountain
climbing) to access.
Required Information
• Boundary of MRS
• Location and type of fencing
• Terrain and topography within and
surrounding MRS
• Location of transportation routes or
access points to MRS
• Location of any guarded areas
These  categories give the project team  guidelines for determining the  appropriate level of
accessibility to the MRS. The category descriptions do not include LUCs.  A project team can
choose to run multiple iterations of the MEC HA with different Site Accessibility categories to
reflect the effects of LUCs. This will help determine the impact of accessibility changes on the
overall hazard assessment.

4.3.1   Scores for Site Accessibility Categories
Table 4-6 shows the scores for each  of these categories. The scores do not change with cleanup,
since cleanup does not affect site accessibility.
                      Table 4-6. Scores for Site Accessibility Categories
Input Factor
Site
Accessibility
Category or Value
Full accessibility
Moderate accessibility
Limited accessibility
Very limited accessibility
Score
Baseline
Condition
80
55
15
5
Surface
MEC
Cleanup
80
55
15
5
Subsurface
MEC
Cleanup
80
55
15
5
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                    Page 34

4.3.2   Category Changes for Site Accessibility
If planned future land use controls for the MRS will change accessibility characteristics, then the
Site Accessibility input factor category may change as well. Possible changes to accessibility
characteristics include the following:
    •   Change in engineering controls, such as installation or removal of fencing
    •   The removal of heavy vegetation that impedes access to the MRS
    •   The construction of a road to the area containing the MRS where one does not currently
       exist

4.4  Potential Contact Hours
This factor captures the effect of human receptors intentionally performing activities at an MRS
when they  might come  into  contact  with MEC. This contact  may  either  deliberately  or
accidentally initiate an explosive incident.
Both the number of receptors and the amount of time each receptor spends in the MRS contribute
to the likelihood of a receptor encountering MEC.
Potential contact hours are calculated on a site-specific annual total basis. These include outdoor
activities.   Where MEC is on the surface, any  outdoor activity could  lead to an interaction.
Where MEC is located only in the subsurface, an interaction can only result from  intrusive
activities (e.g., digging a fire pit or latrine, maintaining a trail or fence, or planting a tree).
The project team must estimate both the  number of users per year and the number of hours that
each user engages in activities that may result in encounters with MEC. Once all of the  activities
have been identified, the receptor-hours per year for each activity is calculated. The sum of these
receptor-hours determines the total receptor-hours per year.
              The Potential Contact Hours factor is calculated as follows:
              (number of users/year) x (number of hours/use) = receptor hours/year
The categories for this input factor are ranges of receptor-hours per year. These ranges are based
on order of magnitude differences between the categories, as shown in Table 4-7.
                 Table 4-7. Input Factor Categories: Potential Contact Hours
Category
Many hours
Some hours
Few hours
Very few hours
Category Description
> 1,000,000 receptor-hours/year
100,000 to 999,999 receptor-hours/year
10,000 to 99,999 receptor-hours/year
< 10,000 receptor-hours/year
Required Information
• Types of land use activities that will
occur on the MRS
. Average amount of time a person
spends on each activity
. Number of people who participate
annually in each activity
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 35
         The number of users per year can be estimated various ways, for example:
           number of users/year = (number of hikers/week) x (number of weeks park is open/year)
  number of users/year = (number of residents who garden) x (number times gardening/week) x (number of weeks
                                   in gardening season/year)
4.4.1   Scores for Potential Contact Hours Categories
Table 4-8 shows the scores for each of the Potential Contact Hours categories. Cleanup lowers
the scores. This decrease reflects the reduced likelihood that human receptors will come into
contact with MEC after cleanup is performed.
                   Table 4-8. Scores for Potential Contact Hours Categories
Input Factor
Potential
Contact Hours
Category or Value
Many hours
Some hours
Few hours
Very few hours
Score
Baseline
Condition
120
70
40
15
Surface
MEC
Cleanup
90
50
20
10
Subsurface
MEC
Cleanup
30
20
10
5
4.4.2   Category Changes for Potential Contact Hours
Changes in assumptions about the use of LUCs and changes in land use activities can bring about
changes  in the category for this input factor.  The application of engineering controls,  such as
fencing or barriers, or the use of institutional controls, such as restricting the permissible  land
use, may reduce  the potential contact  hours at an MRS.  Changes in future  land use activities
could increase or decrease potential contact hours. For example, a decision  to change  an  area
from an  open space with no hiking trails to an area with hiking trails, picnic areas, and athletic
fields can dramatically increase usage.

4.5 Amount of MEC
This input factor captures the relative  quantity of MEC that may  remain from past munitions-
related activities. The  greater the quantity of MEC items, the greater the likelihood that MEC
may be encountered. For example, more MEC is likely to be present at a former target area  than
at a former function test range. Therefore, the target area is given a higher relative score. Table 4-
9 contains the categories for the Amount of MEC input factor.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                     MEC HA Methodology
                                                                            October 2008
                                                                                 Page 36
                    Table 4-9. Input Factor Categories: Amount of MEC
Category
Target area
OB/OD areas
Function Test Range
Burial pit
Maneuver areas
Firing points
Safety buffer areas
(range safety fans and
OB/OD kick-out areas)
Storage
Explosives-related
industrial facility
Category Description
Areas at which munitions fire was
directed.
Sites where munitions were disposed of
by OB/OD methods. This category refers
to the core activity area of an OB/OD
area (see "Safety buffer areas" category
for information on safety fans and kick-
out areas).
Areas where the serviceability of stored
munitions or weapons systems are tested.
Testing may include components, partial
functioning or complete functioning of
stockpile or developmental items. Also
includes ranges used for research and
development and surveillance.
The location of a burial of large quantities
of MEC items.
Areas used for conducting military
exercises in a simulated conflict area or
war zone.
The location from which a projectile,
grenade, ground signal, rocket, guided
missile, or other device is to be ignited,
propelled, or released.
Areas outside of target areas, test ranges,
or OB/OD areas that were designed to act
as a safety zone to contain munitions that
do not hit targets or to contain kick-outs
from OB/OD areas.
Any facility used for the storage of
military munitions, such as earth-covered
magazines, above-ground magazines, and
open-air storage areas.
Former munitions manufacturing or
demilitarization sites and TNT production
plants.
Required Information
• Nature of the original munitions
activities or sources of MEC (e.g.,
target area, OB/OD area)
• Boundary of MRS
4.5.1   Scores for Amount of MEC Categories
Table 4-10 shows the scores for the categories of the Amount of MEC input factor. The scores
for each category become lower with the increased level of cleanup at an MRS. The reduction in
scores reflects both the reduction in the amount of MEC and the  lower likelihood that human
receptors will come into contact with MEC after cleanup.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                     MEC HA Methodology
                                                                            October 2008
                                                                                 Page 37
                     Table 4-10. Scores for Amount of MEC Categories
Input Factor
Amount of MEC
Category or Value
Target area
OB/OD area
Function Test Range
Burial pit
Maneuver areas
Firing points
Safety buffer areas
Storage
Explosives-related industrial facility
Score
Baseline
Condition
180
180
165
140
115
75
30
25
20
Surface
MEC
Cleanup
120
110
90
140
15
10
10
10
10
Subsurface
MEC
Cleanup
30
30
25
10
5
5
5
5
5
4.5.2   Category Changes for Amount of MEC
The categories  chosen for Amount of MEC will  not change unless additional information
indicates that the selected category is incorrect.

4.6  Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth
This factor is used to indicate whether MEC items are at depths that can be reached by expected
human receptor activity. Table 4-11 contains the categories for this input factor.

          Table 4-11. Input Factor Categories: Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the
                                Maximum Intrusive Depth
Category
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
does not overlap with subsurface
MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with minimum MEC
depth
Category Description
The area contains munitions that are
entirely or partially exposed above the
ground surface as well as entirely beneath
the ground surface, and the known or
suspected minimum depth of the subsurface
MEC is less than the expected depth of
intrusive activity. See Figure 4-2.
The area contains munitions that are
entirely or partially exposed above the
ground surface as well as entirely beneath
the ground surface, and the known or
suspected minimum depth of the subsurface
MEC is greater than the expected depth of
intrusive activity. See Figure 4-2.
The area contains munitions that are
entirely beneath the ground surface. The
known or suspected minimum depth of the
subsurface MEC is less than the expected
depth of intrusive activity. See Figure 4-2.
Required Information
• Specific land use activities
within the MRS now or in
the future
• Maximum intrusive depths
associated with each of the
activities
• Past munitions-related
activities that occurred in
the MRS
• Minimum depth at which
MEC is expected to be
found (e.g., surface, x feet
below ground surface), as
a result of that activity
• Minimum depth at which
MEC is expected to be
found for each remediation
alternative
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                  October 2008
                                                                                      Page 38

          Table 4-11. Input Factor Categories: Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the
                                  Maximum Intrusive Depth
Category
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth does
not overlap with minimum MEC
depth
Category Description
The area contains munitions that are
entirely beneath the ground surface. The
known or suspected minimum depth of the
subsurface MEC is greater than the
expected depth of intrusive activity. See
Figure 4-2.
Required Information

Assuming a minimum MEC depth is necessary  to
determine whether  or  not  it  overlaps  with the
maximum intrusive depth, the results of site-specific
geophysical  investigations  and  digging  of  target
anomalies will be the best source of information on
the depths of MEC.  It will be reasonable to assume
that MEC is located both surface and subsurface for
the Baseline Conditions in many types of MRS.  If the
project team agrees that a past surface clearance has
been  effective,  then it  may select  one  of the two
categories with  MEC located only in  the  subsurface
for the Baseline Conditions.
The input factor categories are illustrated in Figure 4-2.
             Past Surface Clearances
Many sites, especially World War II era FUDS, were
surface cleared before they were released from DoD
control. Information adequate to determine the extent and
effectiveness of these clearances might not be available.

Project teams may have information to support
assumptions about whether Baseline Conditions should
have MEC located both surface and subsurface, or MEC
located only in the subsurface.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                               MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                       October 2008
                                                                                            Page 39
             A. Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface
                After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC
^ — ' _
                                               ^
                                                                      [Minimum MEC Depth

                                                                    _ Maximum Intrusive Depth
             B. Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface
                After Cleanup: Intrusive depth does not oi/ertap with subsurface MEC
                                                   fiVVVv
                                                   Maximum Intrusive
                                                     I   Depth
                                                   .1 -------- _L
                                        Minimum
                                        MEC
                                        Depth
            C. Baseline Condition: MEC located only subsurface
               After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with minimum MEC depth
                                                          i^v^x
                                                                  t^lnlmum MEC Depth

                                                                _ Maximum Intrusive Depth
            D. Baseline Condition: MEC located only subsurface
               After Cleanup: Intrusive depth does not overlap with minimum MEC depth
                                                                         Minimum
                                                                         MEC
                                                                         Depth
     Figure 4-2. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Depth of Receptor Activities
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 40
4.6.1   Scores for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth
       Categories
Table 4-12 shows the scores for each of these categories.
       Table 4-12. Scores for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive
                                     Depth Categories
Input Factor
Minimum MEC
Depth Relative to
the
Maximum
Intrusive Depth
Category or Value
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface
After Cleanup: Intrusive
depth overlaps with subsurface
MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface
After Cleanup: Intrusive
depth does not overlap with
subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with minimum MEC
depth
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
does not overlap with
minimum MEC depth
Score
Baseline
Condition
240
240
150
50
Surface MEC
Cleanup
150
50
N/A*
N/A*
Subsurface
MEC Cleanup
95
25
95
25
*N/A - Not Applicable: Surface cleanups for MEC would not be appropriate for site conditions where MEC is all
in the subsurface.

4.6.2   Category Changes for Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive
       Depth
This category  will change when  the relationship between the minimum MEC  depth  and the
maximum intrusive  depth changes.  The minimum MEC depth will  only change when  a
subsurface  cleanup is  evaluated.   Generally,  subsurface cleanups to  depths that exceed the
maximum intrusive depth will be among evaluated alternatives.   The MEC HA  can also score
alternatives where the minimum MEC depth after cleanup remains above the maximum intrusive
depth to help evaluate subsurface cleanup alternatives with determined or reasonably anticipated
future land uses that are more intrusive than the current land use.
The maximum intrusive depth may change with land use activity changes. Examples of scenarios
that may change the maximum intrusive depth include the following:

   •   Allowing camping in  an area where it was previously prohibited.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                          MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                   October 2008
                                                                                       Page 41

    •  Converting open space to cattle grazing, requiring the installation of fencing and water
       stations.
    •  Developing an undeveloped area, which may involve extensive grading and excavations
       for the construction of building foundations.

4.7 Migration Potential

This factor addresses the  likelihood that MEC items can be moved by natural  processes (e.g.,
erosion or frost  heave). The movement or  exposure of MEC  items by natural processes can
increase the likelihood that receptors will encounter the items.

The categories for this factor are  shown in  Table 4-13.  This input factor category will rarely
change over time.

                   Table 4-13. Input Factor Categories: Migration Potential
  Category
          Category Description
        Required Information
   Possible
Historical or physical evidence indicates that it
 is possible for natural physical forces in the
   area (e.g., frost heave, erosion) to expose
 subsurface MEC items or to move surface or
         subsurface MEC items.
   Unlikely
 Historical or physical evidence indicates that
 natural physical forces in the area (e.g., frost
    heave, erosion) are unlikely to expose
 subsurface MEC items or to move surface or
         subsurface MEC items.
• Climatic and geologic conditions
• Types of land cover associated with MRS
  (vegetative conditions)
• Boundary of MRS area
• Location of frost line and potential for frost
  heave
• Rainfall patterns and amounts
• Direction of overland flow
• Location of areas of erosion activity within
  MRS
• Location or areas of tidal influence within
  MRS
4.7.1  Scores for Migration Potential
Table 4-14 shows the scoring values for these categories. If subsurface cleanup of MEC occurs,
MEC is less likely to be exposed.
                     Table 4-14. Scores for Migration Potential Categories
Input Factor
Migration Potential
Category or Value
Possible
Unlikely
Score
Baseline
Condition
30
10
Surface MEC
Cleanup
30
10
Subsurface
MEC Cleanup
10
10
4.7.2  Category Changes for Migration Potential
The project team can decide to change this input factor category if specific measures are taken to
control migration, or  if new information about site  dynamics indicates  greater  chance  for
migration than the project team assumed originally.

4.8  MEC Classification
This input factor describes how easily an initiating receptor might detonate MEC. By definition,
UXO are military  munitions that: have been primed, fuzed,  armed, or otherwise prepared  for
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 42

action; have been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to constitute
a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material; and remain unexploded whether by
malfunction,  design, or any  other  cause.  The failure of military  munitions to  function as
designed presents the greatest  hazard.   Although  all UXO  are dangerous and  subject to
detonation, some of the UXO have  fuzes that are more susceptible to functioning and thus  are
more hazardous and likely to function by casual or intentional contact. These MEC have been
designated "Sensitive UXO."

There are a number of fuzed DMM that may more easily arm and function.  These limited DMM
are given the category "Fuzed Sensitive DMM."  Other fuzed DMM less likely to arm are in  the
"Fuzed DMM" category to reflect the hazard difference between the two categories of fuzed
DMM.
Table 4-15 contains the categories for this input factor. The categories are listed in order from
those posing the highest explosive hazard to those posing the lowest.
                   Table 4-15. Input Factor Categories: MEC Classification
Category
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk explosives
Category Description
UXO items with fuzes that are more
likely to function with any movement
(e.g., all-way-acting fuzes) or potential
environmental conditions (e.g.,
piezoelectric fuzes).
All other UXO items.
DMM with a fuzing mechanism present,
but not armed (put into a state of
readiness) for use. Sensitive DMM fuzes
can be armed and functioned through
human activity (e.g., hand grenades).
DMM with a fuzing mechanism present,
but not armed (not put into a state of
readiness) for use. Fuzes on DMM in this
category require high inertial energy (e.g.,
g-forces or rapid rotation) to be armed.
This category also contains unarmed
fuzes not installed in munitions.
DMM without fuzing mechanisms. This
category also includes boosters, bursters,
and blasting caps.
Explosive material that is not contained in
cased munitions or is present in soils or
sediment.
Required Information
• Nature of munitions-related activities that
took place on the MRS
• Types of munitions (mark or model)
• Presence and type of fuzing
• State of fuzing (armed or unarmed)
UXO items are always more hazardous than DMM. Where uncertainty exists about the condition
of MEC, conservative assumptions should be made and  documented. For example, if there is
uncertainty about type of fuzes in DMM, then the conservative assumption would be the input
factor category Fuzed Sensitive DMM.
The  flowchart in Figure 4-3 provides a decision process that can be used  to  determine  the
category for MEC Classification for cased munitions. A text summary of the decision process is
also provided.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 43

UXO:  Unless there is evidence to the contrary, the Project  Teams  should  assume UXO is
present in target areas, and may also be present in safety buffer zones. UXO may also be present
in QA function test ranges. UXO may also be present in OB/OD  areas when:

   •   The OB/OD area is located adjacent to a range, indicating that it was sited to serve as a
       UXO disposal area.
   •   Historical evidence indicates that an explosive ordnance disposal team used the OB/OD
       area to dispose of UXO.
   •   UXO has been found in the OB/OD area.
If these circumstances do not apply, then it is probably more reasonable to assume that the
OB/OD area  only contains DMM.   DMM in OB/OD areas have  "experienced  abnormal
environments"13 (i.e., have been subjected to attempted demilitarization by OB/OD) and should
be scored as UXO until assessed and determined to be DMM by technically qualified personnel.
If the MEC is UXO, the project team must determine whether the UXO is special case. When the
following types of MEC are  present,  the project  team should select the "Sensitive UXO"
category for this input factor:

   •   All submunitions                           •  High explosive anti-tank (HEAT)
                                                   rounds
   •   Rifle propelled 40mm projectiles (often       •  Hand grenades
       called 40mm grenades)
   •   All munitions with white phosphorus         •  All mortar rounds (a)
       filler
(a) Mortars are included in this category due to the ability  to remove the  safety from the fuze.
Mortars are fin stabilized, which means they do not spin in flight as do most projectiles.  The
spin action is used to arm the fuze in many projectiles. In  addition, the M524 fuze developed in
the Vietnam era is very sensitive, and can readily trigger a denotation.

DMM:  MRS where a project team can assume that the MEC items are DMM include the
following:

   •   OB/OD Areas where a DMM has been       •  Burial pit
       found
   •   Maneuver areas                            •  Storage
   •   Firing points
The DMM can be either fuzed or unfuzed. If fuzed, then the fuze category for the DMM should
be determined. The "Fuzed Sensitive DMM" category includes the following:

   •   All submunitions                           •  HEAT rounds
   •   Rifle propelled 40mm projectiles (often       •  Hand grenades
       called 40mm grenades)
   •   All munitions with white phosphorus         •  All mortar rounds
       filler
 ! Minutes of the 327th Meeting of the Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, 14 December 2004.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                                       Page 44
                                                                                       YES
                Start
                                                                                             Select  Sensitive UXO
                                                                                                   Category
                                                                              Is the UXO
                                                                              any of the
                                                                            following types?
                                                                            1. Submunitions;
                                                                      2. Propelled 40mm projectiles
                                                                         3. WP-filled munitions
                                                                            4. HEAT rounds
                                                                            . Hand grenade
                                                                              6. Mortars
         Is the MRS a:
        1. Target Area
       2. Function Test
           Range
        3. Safety buffer
         for  #1 or#
                                                                                                  Select "UXO" Category
                                                  Is any of
                                             the following true?
                                              1. The OB/OD is
                                             adjacent to a range.
                                            2. Historical evidence
                                           that OB/OD was used to
                                              dispose  of UXO
                                              3. UXO has been
                                                  found in
                                                the OB/OD
                                                                                   Technical
                                                                                 assessment to
                                                                               determine whether
                                                                               UXO or only DMM
                                                                               present in OB/OD
 Is the
MRS an
OB/OD
 Area?
                Is the
               MRS a:
           1. Maneuver Area
            2. Firing Point
             3. Burial Pit
     4. Explosives-related Industrial
               Facility
        . Safety Buffer for OB/OD
             6. Storage
                                                                                              Select "Fuzed
                                                                                             Sensitive DMM
                                                  Assume only DMM is present
                                                                                                   Is the DMM
                                                                                                    any of the
                                                                                                 following types?
                                                                                                 1. Submunitions;
                                                                                           2. Propelled 40mm projectiles
                                                                                               3. WP-filled munitions
                                                                                                 4. HEAT rounds
                                                                                                5. Hand grenades_
                                                                                                    6. Mortars
                                                            Is DMM
                                                           unfuzed?
Examine evidence to determine
most likely types of munitions
present in the MRS.  If no
evidence is available, select
"Sensitive UXO" as most
conservative category.
                                                      Select Unfuzed DMM category
                                                                                               Select  Fuzed DMM
                                                                                                    category
          Figure 4-3. Selecting the MEC Classification Category for Cased Munitions
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 45
4.8.1   Scores for MEC Classification Categories
Table 4-16 shows the scores for each of these categories.
                    Table 4-16. Scores for MEC Classification Categories
Input Factor
MEC Classification
Category or Value
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk explosives
Score
Baseline
Condition
180
110
105
55
45
45
Surface MEC
Cleanup
180
110
105
55
45
45
Subsurface
MEC
Cleanup
180
110
105
55
45
45
4.8.2   Category Changes for MEC Classification
The categories chosen for MEC  Classification will  not change unless additional information
indicates that the selected category is incorrect.

4.9  MEC Size
This factor indicates the ease with which MEC can be moved by a receptor. A receptor is more
likely to pick up or interact with a small item. For example, an individual is more likely to pick
up or accidentally kick a grenade than a large bomb.
"Small" and "Large" are the categories used to describe this input factor. Large MEC is  equal to
or greater than 90 pounds (e.g., a 155mm  projectile). It is unlikely that receptors could  move
MEC weighing over 90 pounds without special equipment. Table 4-17 contains the categories for
this input factor.
                       Table 4-17. Input Factor Categories: MEC Size
Input Factor
Category
Small
Large
Category Description
MEC items that weigh less than 90 pounds;
small enough for a receptor to be able to
move and initiate a detonation.
MEC items that weigh 90 pounds or more;
too large to move without equipment.
Required Information
• Mark or model of munitions used at MRS
• Outer diameter of munitions
4.9.1   Scores for MEC Size Categories
Table 4-18 shows the scores for MEC Size. The scores for these categories do not change with
clean-up.
                         Table 4-18. Scores for MEC Size Categories
Input Factor
Category or Value
Score
Baseline
Condition
Surface MEC
Cleanup
Subsurface
MEC Cleanup
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                    Page 46
                         Table 4-18. Scores for MEC Size Categories
Input Factor
MEC Size
Category or Value
Small
Large
Score
Baseline
Condition
40
0
Surface MEC
Cleanup
40
0
Subsurface
MEC Cleanup
40
0
4.9.2   Category Changes for MEC Size
The category chosen for MEC Size will not change unless additional information indicates that
the other category  should be selected (i.e., discovery of a new type of munitions at the  site
indicates that the category should be changed from "Large" to "Small").

4.10   Scoring Considerations
Project teams may find  it useful to score the MRS several times to reflect different  site
conditions.  This includes   different land use activities,  conditions after  cleanup,   land  use
controls, or combinations of these scenarios.
Information on current, determined,  or reasonably anticipated future land use activities is used
for the selection of categories for four input factors:

    •   Location of Additional Human Receptors
    •   Site Accessibility
    •   Potential Contact Hours
    •   Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth
Outdoor activities create the greatest potential exposure to MEC. Each land use type (e.g.,
residential, industrial or commercial, recreational, and open space) may have associated outdoor
activities. Residential  users may garden  or build  an  addition onto their home. Construction,
agriculture, and mining are by their nature intrusive; examples include upgrading or replacement
of buried infrastructure and seasonal plantings or landscape upgrades.
Project teams will need  to agree on  the determined or reasonably  anticipated future land  use
activities. The CERCLA process requires the evaluation of "reasonably anticipated" future land
use. EPA land use guidance emphasizes that project teams evaluate reasonable assumptions that
are sufficiently conservative to be protective into the future.14
In order to fully evaluate current and future land use activities, the project team will need to
obtain the following information for every MRS that is assessed:

    •   Location of places where people may  congregate, either within the boundaries of the
       MRS or in proximity (within the ESQD arc) of the boundaries of the MRS.
    •   Specific  separate land use activities (e.g., plowing, gardening, construction) that  might
       bring receptors into contact with MEC.  When MEC is located in the subsurface, this will
       include only intrusive activities.
    •   Intrusive depth of all activities.
    •   Number of people engaging in each activity per year.
 1 U.S. EPA, Land Use in the CERCLA Remedy Selection Process, OSWER Directive No. 9355.7-04, May 25, 1995.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                     Page 47
       Duration of each activity.
Sources of information on future land use scenarios include, but are not limited to, zoning maps,
local government master plans, local reuse authorities for BRAC sites,  base master plans  (for
active  bases), historical  land use trends, parcel ownership maps from  local government,  and
public park authorities.
The information evaluated for the MEC HA, as well
as the  outputs can be used to support the evaluation
of removal or remedial actions that are protective of
human health and  the  environment.  The project
team  using  the  CERCLA  removal  or  remedial
process will often identify two types of removal or
remedial alternatives:
       Cleanup of MEC items from the surface and
       subsurface. The major variation will be the
       depth and area covered by the cleanup.
       Identification of LUCs that manage potential
       exposure to any remaining MEC.
        Land Use Controls (LUCs)
LUCs include a wide range of restrictions or
controls that arise from the need to protect
human health and the environment and that
limit the use of or exposure to any portion of a
property. They include both engineering and
institutional controls.
Engineering controls are physical barriers,
such as fences, walls, or site security such as
guards that restrict access to a site.
Institutional controls are legal or other non-
engineered controls on access. Examples
include zoning, permitting, deed notifications,
deed restrictions, sign-posting requirements,
and restrictive easements or covenants.
Removal and remedial alternatives  can range from
removal of MEC items combined with use of LUCs,
to use of LUCs alone. The NCP remedy preference is that institutional controls not be the sole
remedy unless treatment is impracticable.
Removal or remedial alternatives can affect  various  input factor categories.  The project team
must clearly describe these alternatives to ensure that changes  in selections  of input  factor
categories reflect reasonable assumptions.

4.11  Summary of MEC HA Scores
Table 4-19 summarizes  all of the scoring  tables presented in  this  chapter.  Scores for the
categories are in multiples of five, with a maximum possible score of 1000 and a minimum
possible score of 125. The numeric scores reflect the relative contributions of the different input
factors to MEC hazard. The MEC HA scores should not be interpreted as quantitative measures
of explosive hazard.
                      Table 4-19. Complete MEC HA Scoring Table
Input Factor
Energetic Material Type
Input Factor Category
High Explosives and Low
Explosive Filler in Fragmenting
Rounds
White Phosphorus
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting Charge
Incendiary
Score
Baseline
Condition
100
70
60
50
40
30
Surface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
Subsurface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                               October 2008
                                                                                   Page 48
                      Table 4-19. Complete MEC HA Scoring Table
Input Factor
Location of Additional
Human Receptors
Site Accessibility
Potential Contact Hours
Amount of MEC
Minimum MEC Depth
Relative to the Maximum
Receptor Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
Input Factor Category
Inside MRS or inside the ESQD
arc surrounding the MRS
Outside of the ESQD arc
Full Accessibility
Moderate Accessibility
Limited Accessibility
Very Limited Accessibility
Many Hours
Some Hours
Few Hours
Very Few Hours
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Function Test Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver Areas
Firing Points
Safety Buffer Areas
Storage
Explosive-Related Industrial
Facility
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
does not overlap with subsurface
MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with minimum MEC
depth
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth does
not overlap with minimum MEC
depth
Possible
Unlikely
Score
Baseline
Condition
30
0
80
55
15
5
120
70
40
15
180
180
165
140
115
75
30
25
20
240
240
150
50
30
10
Surface
Cleanup
30
0
80
55
15
5
90
50
20
10
120
110
90
140
15
10
10
10
10
150
50
N/A*
N/A*
30
10
Subsurface
Cleanup
30
0
80
55
15
5
30
20
10
5
30
30
25
10
5
5
5
5
5
95
25
95
25
10
10
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page 49
                      Table 4-19. Complete MEC HA Scoring Table
Input Factor
MEC Classification

MEC Size
Input Factor Category
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk Explosives
Small
Large
Score
Baseline
Condition
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
Surface
Cleanup
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
Subsurface
Cleanup
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0
*N/A - Not Applicable: Surface cleanup for MEC would not be appropriate for site conditions where MEC is all in
the subsurface.
4.12 Relationships between Protocol EHE Data Elements and MEC HA Input Factors
The following table illustrates the relationships between the Data Elements for the EHE module
of the Protocol and the Input Factors for the MEC HA.  Many of the same site characteristics are
addressed by both tools, since both were created to assess explosive hazards in MRS.  The
differences between the EHE  Data Elements and the MEC HA Input Factors are due to the
different purposes of the two tools, and different assumptions regarding the type and amount of
information available when the tools are applied.
Table 4-20. Relationship between Protocol EHE Data Elements  and the MEC HA Input
Factors
Protocol EHE Data Element
Munitions Type
Source of Hazard
Information on Location of
Munitions
Ease of Access
Status of Property
Population Density
Population Near Hazard
Related MEC HA Input
Factors
Energetic Material Type
MEC Classification
Amount of MEC
Minimum MEC Depth Relative
to the Maximum Receptor
Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
Site Accessibility
No related MEC HA Input
Factor
Potential Contact Hours
Location of Additional Human
Receptors
Potential Contact Hours
Remarks
EHE Data Element
classifications combine the two
MEC HA Input Factors

EHE Data Element
classifications address both the
MEC depth (surface or
subsurface) and the stability of
the MRS




Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                               MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                        October 2008
                                                                                             Page 50
Protocol EHE Data Element
Types of Activities/ Structures
Ecological and /or Cultural
Resources
No related EHE Data Element
Related MEC HA Input
Factors
Minimum MEC Depth Relative
to the Maximum Receptor
Intrusive Depth
Potential Contact Hours
No related MEC HA Input
Factor
MEC Size
Remarks

MEC HA guidance recommends
that presence of ecological or
cultural resources be addressed
during CERCLA nine criteria
analysis

Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                             MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                      October 2008
                                                                                          Page 51
This page intentionally left blank.
Chapter 4: Input Factors and Scoring

-------
                                                                        MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                October 2008
                                                                                    Page 52
CHAPTER 5: OUTPUT OF THE MEC HA: HAZARD LEVELS
                                                    Important Terms in This Chapter

                                           CERCLA Nine Criteria
                                           The factors evaluated during a CERCLA feasibility study
                                           to evaluate remedial action alternatives.

                                           Hazard Levels
                                           One of four groups or ranges of numbers that is the result
                                           of the scoring process of the MEC HA. Each Hazard Level
                                           category describes the relative explosive hazard of a
                                           munitions response site.

                                           Removal Action
                                           A response action under CERCLA that addresses
                                           immediate threats to human health and the environment.

                                           Remedial Action
                                           A response action under CERCLA that is intended to be a
                                           permanent remedy. Remedial actions can be taken instead
                                           of or in addition to a removal action.
This chapter discusses both the scores that
are associated with each Hazard Level and
the meaning of the different levels. The
chapter also describes the use of the MEC
HA in the CERCLA removal and remedial
processes.
Each MRS may have  several MEC HA
scores,  depending  on  the  number  of
removal  or  remedial  alternatives  and
current,    determined,    or    reasonably
anticipated  future land  uses.  Different
assumptions  about  land  use  activities,
cleanup   options,   or  LUCs   can   be
considered  in  combination  or  can  be
considered separately. A typical MEC HA
conducted  after a thorough  investigation
(removal or remedial) should evaluate the following alternatives.

    •  No action
    •  LUCs alone
    •  Surface cleanup with or without LUCs, under current, determined or reasonably
       anticipated future land uses
    •  Surface and subsurface cleanup both with and without LUCs, under current, determined,
       or reasonably anticipated future  land uses
When the MEC HA scoring is complete, each alternative response or reuse evaluated for an
MRS will have a score that falls into one of four Hazard Levels.

5.1   Scoring and Hazard Levels
The Hazard Levels and associated scores represent groupings of sites with  common or similar
attributes with respect to conditions that constitute the explosive hazards. As noted elsewhere in
this guidance, the scores have meaning only with respect to one another. The score ranges for the
Hazard Levels are based on sensitivity runs that are documented in Appendix D. Table 5-1
presents the four MEC HA Hazard Levels and score ranges.
                               Table 5-1. Hazard Level Scores
Hazard Level
1
2
3
4
Maximum
MEC HA
Score
1000
835
720
525
Minimum
MEC HA
Score
840
725
530
125
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 53
5.1.1   Hazard Level 1
This Hazard Level identifies  MRS  with the highest  potential  explosive hazard  conditions.
Typical characteristics of Hazard Level 1 MRS conditions include the following:

   •   High-explosive-filled UXO, usually "Sensitive UXO" on the surface
   •   A former target area or OB/OD area
   •   An MRS with full or moderate accessibility
   •   Has the presence of additional human receptors inside the MRS or ESQD
   •   May include subsurface MEC with intrusive activities to the depth of subsurface MEC
   •   An MRS that has not undergone a cleanup

An example Hazard Level  1 scenario is described below.  Additional MRS characteristics and
combinations can be found in Appendix D.

Hazard Level 1 Scenario
An example of a Hazard Level  1 scenario is an MRS that:
   •   Is a former OB/OD Area for MEC including fuzed 60mm HE mortars.
   •   Has a history of 60mm mortars found on the surface.
   •   Historical response actions have been  limited to removal of single items.  Has not
       undergone a thorough cleanup
   •   Is fully accessible to people who will engage in intrusive activities such as gardening or
       landscape maintenance.
5.1.2   Hazard Level 2
This Hazard Level  identifies MRS with high potential explosive hazard conditions.   Typical
characteristics of a Hazard  Level 2 MRS include the following:

   •   Former target area,  OB/OD area, function test range, or maneuver area
   •   UXO, or Fuzed Sensitive DMM on the surface, or intrusive activities that overlap with
       minimum depths of UXO or Fuzed Sensitive DMM located only  subsurface
   •   Has full or moderate accessibility to people who will engage in intrusive activities
An example Hazard Level 2 scenario is described below.  Additional MRS characteristics and
combinations can be found in Appendix D.

Hazard Level 2 Scenario
An example of a Hazard Level 2 scenario is an MRS that:
   •   Is a former Target Area with UXO present, Large Size (e.g., 155mm artillery).
   •   Has a history of UXO found on the surface.
   •   Has not been cleaned up.
   •   Has been fenced with barbed-wire, but is otherwise accessible to  recreational users.
5.1.3   Hazard Level 3
This Hazard level identifies MRS with moderate potential explosive hazard conditions.  Typical
characteristics of a Hazard  Level 3 MRS include the following:
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 54

   •   DMM on the surface, or intrusive activities that overlap with minimum depths of DMM
       located only subsurface

   •   Former  target area,  OB/OD area,  function  test range, or maneuver  area that has
       undergone a surface cleanup

   •   An MRS with moderate or limited accessibility, and a low number of contact hours
Two example Hazard Level 3 scenarios are described below. Additional MRS characteristics and
combinations can be found in Appendix D.

Hazard Level 3 Scenario 1
   •   The MRS is a former range fan. The target area is addressed under a separate hazard
       assessment.
   •   60mm HE mortars were found in the target area
   •   The target area and range fan have undergone a surface cleanup
   •   The MRS is fully accessible by a large number of people who will conduct non-intrusive
       activities such as hiking.
Hazard Level 3 Scenario 2
   •   The MRS is golf course built over a 100 pound bombing range. The bombing range was
       cleared and then covered with several feet of soil before grading for a golf course. There
       is no intrusive use that exceeds the depth of the soil cover
   •   There is full accessibility for recreational surface activities
5.1.4   Hazard Level 4
This Hazard Level identifies MRS with low potential explosive hazard conditions. The presence
of MEC at an MRS means that an explosive hazard may exist. Therefore, MEC may still pose a
hazard at a Hazard Level 4 MRS. Typical characteristics of an MRS in Hazard Level 4 include
the following:

   •   A MEC cleanup was  performed or MEC is only located subsurface, below the depth of
       receptor intrusive activities
   •   Energetic Material Type is propellant, spotting charge, or incendiary
   •   Accessibility is Limited  or Very Limited, and contact hours are few or very few.  This
       may be the result of LUCs.
An example Hazard Level 4 scenario is described below. Additional MRS characteristics and
combinations can be found in Appendix D.
Hazard Level 4 Scenario
An example of a Hazard Level 4 scenario is an MRS that:
   •   A former  target  area for pyrotechnic munitions  that were  located both surface and
       subsurface
   •   Has had both a surface and subsurface cleanup
   •   Intrusive activities do not extend below the depth of removed subsurface items
   •   Has LUCs requiring permits for any intrusive activities
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 55
                                                Distinctions Between Removal and Remedial
                                                Actions
                                                "Removals are distinct from remedial actions in
                                                that they may mitigate or stabilize the threat
                                                rather than comprehensively address all threats at
                                                a site."
                                                   Preamble, National Contingency Plan, Federal
                                                         Register vol. 55, p. 8695 (March 1990)
5.2  MEC HA in the CERCLA Remedy Evaluation and Selection Process
The  evaluation of removal  and remedial action
alternatives  is required  under  CERCLA.  The
primary differences  between CERCLA removal
and  remedial  programs  are the urgency  of a
response and  the  objectives considered  for  the
MRS.   Removals   must   contribute  to   the
effectiveness  of  the long-term actions  of  the
remedial program. This section explains how the
MEC HA input factors and Hazard Levels provide
site-specific information  that can be used to support alternative analysis and decisions  for
removal or remedial actions.
5.2.1  CERCLA Removal Process
CERCLA provides  for three types of removal  actions: emergency removals, time-critical
removal actions (TCRA), and non-time-critical removal actions (NTCRA). Emergency removal
actions  and  TCRA are generally taken to  abate immediate threats  to human health and  the
environment.  All  removal  actions  are  required  to contribute  to the  performance  and
protectiveness of future remedial actions.
For NTCRA site investigations are  performed and the evaluation of removal  alternatives is
documented in an  EE/CA  report.  An action memorandum documents the removal  action
decision(s). The removal  alternatives must be protective of human health and the environment
but will often be the  first  or an interim step in the cleanup process. Additional response actions
may  be necessary through the remedial program.  Table 5-2 describes the  CERCLA selection
criteria for evaluating removal alternatives.15
              Table 5-2.  CERCLA Removal Action Alternative Selection Criteria
Removal Criteria
Effectiveness
Implementability
Cost
Purpose
• Establish protectiveness of remedy to human health and the environment.
• Evaluate short-term effectiveness issues such as effect on the community
and worker protection.
• Ensure compliance with ARARs to the extent practicable and consistent
with the urgency of the situation.
• Consider technical feasibility and availability
alternative.
• Consider administrative feasibility (including
of resources to support the
required LUCs).
• Compare costs of alternatives, including capital costs, operation and
maintenance costs, and present worth cost.
The information from the MEC HA input factors and outputs can be used to support the analysis
of removal alternatives in the EE/CA. The EE/CA examines three broad criteria: Effectiveness,
Implementability, and  Cost. For the Effectiveness Criterion, the MEC HA  input factors of
Energetic Material Type, Location of Additional Human Receptors, Site Accessibility, Amount
of MEC, and MEC Classification can provide information to support evaluation  of short-term
effectiveness, and compliance with ARARs. This can be accomplished by evaluating information
 ' U.S. EPA, Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA, EPA/540/F-94/009, December 1993.
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                         MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                 October 2008
                                                                                     Page 56

regarding worker protection and/or  community protection associated  with the ESQD arc. In
addition the identification of cultural or ecological resources and critical infrastructure may assist
in the evaluation of location-specific or action-specific ARARs.    For the Implementability
Criterion, the MEC HA input factors of Energetic Material Type, Location of Additional Human
Receptors, Site Accessibility,  Amount of MEC, MEC Classification,  and MEC Size support
evaluation of the removal alternatives in the EE/CA report. Cost data is neither collected nor
evaluated in the MEC HA.
                                             Treatment Under CERCLA
                                             Section 121 of CERCLA establishes a strong preference
                                             for remedies that reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume
                                             at the site and achieve "cleanup to the maximum extent
                                             practicable." One objective of the nine criteria evaluation
                                             process is to identify remedies that meet those goals.

                                             For MRSs where the treatment options are generally
                                             limited to a narrow range of destruction alternatives (blow-
                                             in-place, consolidated shot, or containerized versions of
                                             these), the destruction of the MEC should be considered as
                                             constituting cleanup that reduces the amount or volume of
                                             MEC.
5.2.2  CERCLA Remedial Process
Under the CERCLA remedial process, site
investigations   are   undertaken   and  the
evaluation of remedial action alternatives is
documented in an RI/FS.16 The selection of
remedial actions is documented in a Record
of  Decision   (ROD)/Decision   Document
(DD). Each alternative is evaluated using the
CERCLA   nine-criteria    to   select  the
alternative that  best meets the statutory
requirements.  The statute requires that the
selected  remedy  be protective  of human
health and the environment;  comply with
ARARs; utilize treatment to reduce the toxicity, mobility,  or volume  of contamination to the
maximum extent practicable; and be cost-effective.
The CERCLA nine-criteria for analysis of remedial action alternatives are divided into threshold
criteria that must be met.  These include Protection of Human Health and the Environment, and
Compliance with ARARs. Balancing criteria form the  primary basis to compare and contrast
remedial action alternatives. These include Long-term Effectiveness, Short-term Effectiveness,
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility,  or Volume  through Treatment, and Cost.  Modifying criteria
are also evaluated to reflect State and  community  acceptance and input on the analysis of
alternatives. Table 5-3 provides a summary of the CERCLA nine criteria and how information from the
MEC HA Input Factors and Hazard Levels can be used to support the nine criteria analysis.

This information MEC HA can be used to  support these analyses and  remedy selection. However, the MEC
HA is not the decision tool for remedy selection.
16 U.S. EPA, Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, Interim
Final, OSWER Directive 9355.3-01, October 1988.
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                            MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                     October 2008
                                                                                                                                          Page 57

      Table 5-3.  CERCLA Nine-criteria and MEC HA Inputs and Outputs: Considerations for Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives
  CERCLA Nine-criteria
           Description from EPA Guidance
       Associated MEC HA Input Factors and Hazard Levels
                              Draws on assessments conducted under other evaluation
                                  criteria, especially long-term effectiveness and
                              permanence, short-term effectiveness, and compliance
                                                with ARARs.
Protection of Human Health
   and the Environment
 The PJ/FS should describe in the context of this criterion
 how alternatives achieve adequate protection and should
 describe how site risks posed through each pathway being
     addressed by the FS are eliminated, reduced, or
 controlled through treatment, engineering, or institutional
 controls. This evaluation also allows for consideration of
 whether an alternative poses any unacceptable short-term
	or cross-media impacts.	
All of the input factors contain information related to protection of human
  health. Changes to site conditions brought about by activity changes,
 treatment, or LUCs are reflected in changes input factor categories and
                          Hazard Levels.
 Compliance With ARARs
 This evaluation criterion is used to determine whether the
 alternative will meet all of its Federal and State ARARs
 (as defined in CERCLA 121) that have been identified in
 previous stages of the RI/FS process. The analysis should
 identify which are applicable, relevant and appropriate, or
   "to be considered," and describe how the  alternative
 meets these requirements. If an ARAR cannot be met, the
     basis for justifying one of the six ARAR waiver
 requirements should be discussed. Three types of ARARs
 are defined: environmental contaminant-specific (related
 to cleanup levels); action-specific (related to conduct of
    cleanup actions); and location-specific (related to
	protection of specific locations).	
 The MEC HA guidance instructs project teams to assess the presence of
critical infrastructure, cultural and ecological resources. These can include
       location-specific and action-specific ARAR considerations.
   Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                           MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                    October 2008
                                                                                                                                         Page 58

    Table 5-3.  CERCLA Nine-criteria and MEC HA Inputs and Outputs: Considerations for Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives
CERCLA Nine-criteria
Description from EPA Guidance
Associated MEC HA Input Factors and Hazard Levels
                             Magnitude of Residual Risk. This addresses the residual
                               risk remaining from untreated wastes, or treatment
                                 residuals at the conclusion of remedial actions.
                                            The MEC HA scores for the input factors of Energetic Material Type, MEC
                                              Category and MEC Size are not affected through cleanup actions. This
                                            reflects the uncertainty that all MEC can be found and removed. If any MEC
                                             remain, the attributes associated with these input factors are not changed.

                                              The Site Accessibility, Potential Contact Hours, Amount of MEC and
                                           Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth input factor
                                            scores will change with various response actions to reflect changes in Hazard
                                                                          Levels.
Long-Term Effectiveness
                            Adequacy and Reliability of Controls. This addresses the
                            adequacy and suitability of controls, if any, that are used
                             to manage treatment residuals or untreated wastes that
                                             remain at the site.
                                             For MRSs evaluated under the MEC HA, the input factors associated with
                                             LUCs include engineering controls (fences, signage, etc.) and institutional
                                                controls (land use restrictions). The MEC HA input factors for Site
                                           Accessibility and Potential Contact Hours can be affected through changes in
                                              land use and activities. This in turn will result in changes in the Hazard
                                                                          Levels.

                                            The long-term effectiveness and permanence of LUCs will in turn take into
                                              account the administrative feasibility of maintaining the LUCs and the
                                                potential risks or hazards should the controls fail. Evaluation of the
                                              effectiveness of LUCs could in turn lead to reassessment of explosive
                                                                   hazards without LUCs.
  Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                               MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                        October 2008
                                                                                                                                             Page 59

      Table 5-3. CERCLA Nine-criteria and MEC HA Inputs and Outputs: Considerations for Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives
  CERCLA Nine-criteria
          Description from EPA Guidance
         Associated MEC HA Input Factors and Hazard Levels
   Reduction of Toxicity,
Mobility, or Volume Through
         Treatment
   This criterion addresses the statutory preference for
    selecting remedial actions that employ treatment
 technologies that permanently and significantly reduce
 toxicity, mobility, or volume of a hazardous substance,
            especially the principal threats.
   The following MEC HA input factors provide information related to this
 criterion: Amount of MEC, Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum
 Intrusive Depth, and Migration Potential. All of these factors can be affected
  through treatment. This in turn will result in changes to scores and Hazard
                                Levels.

    For MRS where the treatment options are generally limited to certain
 disposal options (blow-in-place, consolidated shot, containerized versions of
   these), the destruction of the MEC should be considered as constituting
    treatment that reduces the amount of MEC found. This is analogous to
   reduction in volume. Mobility in the context of waste treatment, where a
 hazardous substance is immobilized, does not have a direct analogy for MEC.
 Mobility may be considered a function of the ease of moving a MEC item, as
 well as physical processes (e.g., erosion, frost heave, flooding of surrounding
  soil or sediment, tidal currents) that may affect movement of MEC from its
 original depth or location. To the extent that MEC is detected, recovered, and
	disposed of, its ability to move is reduced.	
  Short-Term Effectiveness
    This criterion addresses four areas. These include
  protection of the community during remedial actions;
     protection of workers during remedial actions;
 environmental impacts during remedial actions; and the
  time required to implement and complete the remedial
action. In addition, this criterion should address how any
potential adverse effects associated with these four areas
 can be mitigated or eliminated during remedial actions.
   Information from several of the input factors should be considered in the
  analysis under this criterion. Location of Additional Human Receptors and
 Site Accessibility are key considerations in evaluating current conditions and
  potential mitigation actions that would be appropriate under evaluation of
 other alternatives. Consideration of mitigation measures can affect the input
     scores and in turn affect the input factor scores and Hazard Levels.
      Implementability
 Technical Feasibility. This factor addresses construction
   and operation technical difficulties; availability and
 reliability of technologies to be implemented readily and
without delays; the ease of undertaking additional actions
 at the project site where the remedy under consideration
 could make a future action more difficult; and long-term
     management issues associated with the action.	
                                                                                       The MEC HA addresses this aspect of the criterion. It does this through
                                                                                       information on Energetic Material Type, Location of Additional Human
                                                                                      Receptors, Site Accessibility, Amount of MEC, MEC Classification, and
                                                                                                                  MEC Size.
    Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                                                                               MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                                                                        October 2008
                                                                                                                                             Page 60

      Table 5-3.  CERCLA Nine-criteria and MEC HA Inputs and Outputs: Considerations for Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives
  CERCLA Nine-criteria
           Description from EPA Guidance
         Associated MEC HA Input Factors and Hazard Levels
Implementability (continued)
                                   Administrative Feasibility. Activities needed to
                              coordinate with other offices and agencies (e.g., rights of
                                  entry for on-site activities and permits for off-site
                              	activities).	
                                                          The MEC HA does not address this aspect of the criterion. However,
                                                       administrative requirements associated with maintaining LUCs would need
                                                       to be evaluated to determine if MEC HA evaluations of LUCs are based on
                                                       	realistic assumptions.	
   Availability of Services and Materials. This includes
  availability of off-site treatment, storage, and disposal
   facilities; availability of equipment and specialists;
 availability of services and materials; and availability of
	prospective technologies.	
                                                                                         The MEC HA does not directly address this aspect of the criterion.
           Cost
 The costs of activities typically include estimated capital
     costs (direct and indirect); annual operation and
   maintenance costs; a present worth analysis; and an
 evaluation of the accuracy of costs in the +50% to -30%
	range.	
                The MEC HA does not incorporate costs.
     State Acceptance
       This assessment evaluates the technical and
 administrative issues and concerns the State (or support
 agency in the case of State-led sites) may have regarding
 each of the alternatives. The project team will generally
     discuss this assessment during the course of the
 development and implementation of the RI/FS. It is also
     formally addressed in the decision documents.
  The MEC HA is built on several principles, including systematic planning
 processes and collaborative decision-making. The input factors and Hazard
 Levels do not directly reflect these principles. However, when project teams
follow these principles, then consensus decision-making and State acceptance
                        is more likely to occur.
  Community Acceptance
 This assessment evaluates issues and concerns the public
   may have regarding each of the alternatives. As with
 State Acceptance, this criterion will be addressed in the
 decision document once comments on the RI/FS reports
	and proposed plan have been received.	
  The MEC HA is built on several principles, including systematic planning
 processes and collaborative decision-making. The input factors and Hazard
 Levels do not directly reflect these principles. However, when project teams
  follow these principles, then consensus decision-making and community
	acceptance is more likely to occur.	
    Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                          MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                  October 2008
                                                                                       Page 61
This page intentionally left blank.
Chapter 5: Output of the MEC Hazard Assessment

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 62
                                      GLOSSARY
The source for each term in this glossary is identified in one of two ways. First, when the term is
used in a manner that is specific to this document, the definition is introduced with the phrase,
"For the purposes of the MEC HA. " Specific references are provided for the definitions of most
other terms.   To the extent if any that any definitions conflicts in any way with a statutory or
promulgated definition,  the statutory  or promulgated definition controls.   These definitions
reflect references current as of January 2008.

Accessibility. For the purposes of the MEC HA, a component of explosive hazard that reflects
the ease with which a casual user can enter an area and thereby be potentially exposed to a MEC
hazard.
Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). Applicable requirements are
those cleanup standards of control, and other substantive environmental  protections, criteria, or
limitations promulgated under  Federal  or State  law that specifically address a  hazardous
substance, pollutant, contaminant, remedial  action, location, or other circumstance at a CERCLA
site. Relevant and appropriate requirements are those same standards  mentioned above that,
although not applicable to specific aspects of the CERCLA site, address problems  or situations
sufficiently similar to those encountered at the site that their use is well  suited to the particular
site.1
Ammunition and explosives storage facility. Any  facility used for the storage of military
munitions. This definition includes, but is not limited to, earth-covered magazines, above-ground
magazines, and open-air storage areas.2
Amount of MEC. For the purposes of the MEC HA,  this input factor  to the MEC HA captures
the relative quantity of MEC that may remain from past munitions-related activities at the MRS.
The greater the number of MEC items, the greater the likelihood that one  may be encountered by
a receptor. Source area types (such as target areas, open burning/open detonation areas) are used
to indicate this relative amount of munitions.
Archive search report  (ASR). A historical records  review process  for munitions responses,
developed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. An ASR is an initial  historical records review
conducted at FUDS  that have the potential for munitions contamination. The purpose of this
records search is to locate and retrieve sufficient information related to the presence and use of
military munitions  at the site  to  determine program eligibility. When evidence of military
munitions is found, it is documented in the ASR. The ASR serves as initial  documentation  of the
FUDS as an  MRS. In the event the ASR shows that a site may contain  MEC, additional, more
exhaustive historical investigation may be required.3
Baseline  risk assessment. An assessment conducted  using the data collected during the RI to
characterize the current and potential threats to human health and the  environment that may be
posed by contaminants migrating to  groundwater or surface water, releasing to  air by leaching
through soil,  remaining in the soil, and bioaccumulating in the food chain.4
Basic types  of munitions. Small  arms ammunition,  grenades,  artillery ammunitions, bombs,
pyrotechnics,  rockets, jet-assisted take-offs, mines  (sea/land), demolition materials, guided
missiles, cartridge-actuated devices for aircraft use, torpedoes.5
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 63

Bulk explosives. Explosives that are not contained in a cased munition. They can result from
industrial processes, discarded donor charges used for demolition, or explosives released from
low-ordered rounds. The first two sources could result in large amounts of bulk explosives; large
amounts are much less likely with the third source. In the MEC HA, the amount of concern is the
amount associated with the  "maximum credible event" for the scenario in question.

Buried munitions. See definition for discarded military munitions (DMM).
Comprehensive Environmental Response,  Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Commonly known as Superfund, a Federal law that provides for the cleanup of releases from
abandoned waste sites that contain hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants.4
Conceptual Site Model  (CSM). A description of a site  and its environment that is based on
existing knowledge and  is updated regularly. It  describes sources  of MEC at  a site; actual,
potentially complete, or incomplete exposure pathways; current or reasonably anticipated future
land use; and potential receptors. The source-receptor interaction is one descriptive output of a
CSM. The CSM serves as a planning instrument,  a modeling and data interpretation aid, and a
communication device among the response team members.6
Critical infrastructure. For the purposes of the MEC  HA, unoccupied structures that provide
vital resource  to the surrounding community. Examples  of infrastructure include, but are not
limited  to,  electrical transmission or distribution lines, telephone lines, electrical substations,
pipelines, bridges and highways.
Cultural resources. For the purposes of the MEC HA, cultural, traditional, spiritual, religious,
or historical features of a munitions response site (e.g.,  structures,  artifacts,  symbolism). For
example, American Indians or Alaska Natives deem the MRS to be of religious significance if it
contains areas that are used by American Indians or Alaska Natives for subsistence activities
(e.g., hunting, fishing). Requirements for determining if a particular feature is a cultural resource
are found in the National Historic Preservation  Act, Native American Graves  Protection and
Repatriation Act, Archaeological Resources Protection Act, Executive Order  13007, and the
American Indian Religious Freedom Act.
Current land use. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the prevailing use or activity occurring in a
given area.  Activities may include a wide variety of intrusive actions, such as construction,
camping, or gardening.
Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB). The  Department of Defense
organization that's Chairman serves  as  the principal  corporate manager and overseer of
explosives safety and is charged  with maintaining effective DoD explosives  safety management
(ESM) and annually reporting on the DoD ESM posture. 7
Discarded military munitions (DMM). Military munitions that have  been  abandoned without
proper disposal or removed from storage  in a military magazine or other storage area for the
purpose of disposal. The term does not include unexploded ordnance, military munitions that are
being held for  future use or  planned disposal, or military  munitions  that have  been properly
disposed of consistent  with applicable environmental laws and regulations.8 (10 U.S.C.  2710
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 64

Ecological resources. For purposes of the MEC HA, ecological resources include the following:
(1) a threatened or endangered species (designated under the Endangered Species Act) present on
the MRS;  (2)  an MRS designated under  the  ESA  as  critical habitat  for  a threatened  or
endangered species; or (3) identified sensitive ecosystems such as wetlands or breeding grounds
present on the MRS.
Energetic Material Type. For the purposes of the MEC HA, this input factor is to be used to
determine the potential severity of impact should a MEC item function. This factor indicates the
type of explosives in the munitions.
Engineering Controls. Engineered measures designed to prevent or limit access and exposure to
hazardous components left in place at a site or to ensure effectiveness  of the chosen remedy.
Engineering controls are usually, but not always, fences or other physical barriers to a site.
Explosion. A environmental contaminant reaction of any environmental contaminant compound
or mechanical mixture that, when initiated, undergoes a very rapid combustion or decomposition,
releasing large volumes of highly heated gases that exert pressure on the surrounding medium.
Also, a mechanical reaction in which failure of the container causes sudden release of pressure
from within a pressure vessel.  Depending on the rate of energy release,  an explosion can be
categorized as a deflagration, a detonation, or a pressure rupture.5
Explosive. A substance or mixture of substances that is capable, by environmental contaminant
reaction, of producing gas at  such temperatures, pressure,  and speed as to cause damage to the
surroundings. The term explosive includes all substances variously known as high explosives and
propellants, together with  igniter, primer, initiator, and  pyrotechnic (e.g., illuminant, smoke,
delay, flare, and incendiary compositions).5
Explosive Safety Quantity-Distance (ESQD). The prescribed minimum distance between sites
handling,  processing,  storing or treating hazard  Class  1  explosive  material  and specified
exposures (i.e., inhabited buildings, public highways, public railways, other storage or handling
facilities or ships, aircraft,  etc.) to afford an acceptable degree of protection and safety to the
specified exposure.  The  size of the ESQD  arc is proportional to the Net  Explosive  Weight
present.
Explosives  Safety  Site  Approval.  The   authorization  obtained prior to  beginning  new
construction,  modifying existing structures, or conducting munitions response actions that create
new or impact existing ESQD arcs at Navy shore activities where ammunition and explosives are
handled, processed,  stored or  treated, or on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain
MEC. Explosives safety site approval is obtained by submitting a Site Approval Request.
Explosives Safety Submission  (ESS). An ESS is a document that details how explosives safety
standards  in  Service-specific explosives safety  directives are  applied to munitions response
actions. The ESS also addresses how the  project  complies  with  applicable  environmental
requirements related to the management of MEC.
Feasibility Study (FS). The FS provides an  analysis of remedial action alternatives to address a
release at a site.  It consists of screening of alternatives  and comparison of alternatives to the
CERCLA nine criteria.   The  FS is typically developed  in conjunction with the remedial
investigation. (40 CFR 300.430 (e)(l)).
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page 65

Firing point or position. The point or location at which a weapon, other than those undergoing
demolition, is placed for firing. (For  demolitions, the firing position is the point or location at
which the firing crew will be located during demolition operations.)9
Fixed ammunition. Ammunition, except small arms and rocket ammunition, that consists of a
cartridge case loaded with propellant and a projectile, which are loaded in one operation into the
weapon, the cartridge case being firmly attached to the projectile.10
Formerly used defense sites (FUDS). Real property that was formerly owned by, leased by,
possessed by,  or otherwise under the jurisdiction  of  the Secretary of Defense or the DoD
components, including organizations that predate DoD.11
Fragment. Any complete  ammunition item,  subassembly,  pieces  thereof, or its packaging
material, which is propelled from the site of an explosion.12
Fragmentation. The breaking up of the confining material  of a environmental  contaminant
compound or mechanical mixture when an explosion occurs. Fragments may be complete items,
subassemblies, or pieces thereof, or pieces of equipment  or buildings containing the items.10
Function test range. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the QA function test range is the area
where  munitions or weapons  systems  are tested.  Testing may include components,  partial
functioning, or complete functions of stockpile or developmental items.
Future land use. For the purposes of the MEC HA, defined as the type of land use intended to
be implemented in a given area.
Fuze. (1) A device with explosive components designed to initiate a train of fire or detonation in
ordnance. (2) A non-explosive device  designed to initiate an explosion in ordnance.13
Fuzed Sensitive DMM.  For the purposes  of the MEC HA,  DMM with a fuzing mechanism
present, but not armed (put  into a state of readiness) for use. DMM with special case fuzes can
be armed and functioned through human activity (e.g., hand grenades).
Fuze sensitivity. For a choice associated  with  the MEC  HA   input factor  called MEC
classification, which reflects how sensitive a fuze may be to external forces, both mechanical and
environmental.  All fuzes that have been fired are assumed to be fully armed and as such have a
risk associated with any movement or potential environmental actions on that item. Some fuzes
have  more risk  with  any  movement  (e.g.,  all-way-acting,  cock-striker)  or  potential
environmental conditions (e.g., piezoelectric).10
Hazard. Any real  or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death of personnel;
damage to or loss of a system, equipment, or property; or damage to the environment.14
Hazard assessment. For the purposes of the MEC HA, involves  evaluation of the real  and
potential conditions at a munitions response site that can lead to an unplanned explosive incident
(an explosive mishap) resulting from a member of the general public (i.e., a receptor) interacting
with a MEC item. The evaluation considers the mishap risk (or likelihood) and the severity of the
mishap if it occurs. The three components of explosive hazard that are used to conduct the MEC
HA are severity, accessibility, and sensitivity.
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                  Page 66

Hazard assessment framework. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the hazard assessment
framework incorporates the structure and input factors specified in the HA guidance to meet the
objectives of the hazard assessment process.
Hazard assessment methodology. For  the  purposes of the MEC HA, the documentation
developed to provide instruction on the objectives, hazard assessment framework, and hazard
assessment process as developed by the MEC Hazard Assessment Technical Working Group.
Hazard assessment process. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the process by  which MEC
hazard is determined for munitions response sites. The hazard assessment process consists of the
hazard assessment framework and the hazard assessment guidance used to meet the objectives.
Hazard Level. For the  purposes  of the MEC HA,  hazard level refers to the information
produced by the hazard assessment process using the input factors and MEC HA framework. The
hazard level categories  provide descriptions of the explosive hazard of an MRS.
High explosive. An explosive substance designed to function by  detonation (e.g., main charge,
booster, or primary explosive).5
Impact area. The identified area within a range intended to capture or contain  ammunition,
munitions, or explosives and resulting debris,  fragments, and components from various weapon
systems.15
Incendiary.  A environmental contaminant  agent used primarily for igniting  combustible
substances with which it is in contact by generating sufficient heat to cause ignition.16
Inert items. Inert ordnance poses no explosive hazard to personnel or material. Includes those
practice and service items manufactured  or made empty or  inert for use in training, for desk
nameplates, on display boards, in demonstrations or public  functions, and in offices or work
areas of engineers or other personnel.17 Inert items should  not  be confused with practice  or
training munitions (see  Spotting charge).
Input factor. For the purposes of the MEC HA, one of several  options for  describing  a
hazardous component of the MRS.  The input factor is  assessed and subsequently assigned a
score in the hazard assessment.
Input factor categories. For the purposes of the MEC HA, within  each input factor, one of
several options to describe the site characteristics associated with each input factor. The selection
of the input factor category results in the score for that input factor. Each category has a separate
score that is equal to or less than the total score available for that input factor.
Input factor  component. For the  purposes of the MEC HA, conditions that  describe  the
explosive hazard components and frame the input factors. Input factor components are severity,
accessibility, and sensitivity.
Institutional controls. Non-engineered measures designed to prevent or limit  exposure  to
hazardous substances left in place at a site or to ensure effectiveness of the chosen remedy.
Institutional controls are usually, but not always,  legal controls,  such as easements,  restrictive
covenants, and zoning ordinances.18
Interaction. The  means by which receptors come in contact with MEC, involving two closely
connected elements:  access and activity. Access is the ability of a receptor to enter the source
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 67

area. Activity is any action by a receptor that may result in direct contact with individual MEC
items.6
Intrusive depth. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the depth below ground surface that activity
on the land may intrude. Examples include construction activity, gardening, agricultural tilling,
or erection of a tent (inserting stakes into the ground). This is a required information element for
the input factor that is Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth.
Land  use controls  (LUCs).  Any  type  of physical (engineering  controls),  or  legal,  or
administrative mechanisms (institutional controls) that restrict the use of, or limit access to, real
property to prevent or reduce risks to human health, safety, and the environment. The objective
of LUCs is to ensure that future land use remains compatible with the land use that was the basis
for the evaluation, selection, and implementation of the response action.  As such,  LUCs  are a
common  component of any response action that  does not allow for unrestricted land use
following the completion of the response  action  or of any response action that allows  for
unrestricted use, but that requires that the integrity of the remedy be protected. For example, in
the case  of a response to address military munitions (i.e., UXO  or DMM), LUCs will likely be
necessary to ensure protection  of human  health,  public  safety, and  the environment,  since
technical  limitations suggest that  complete  removal of the military  munitions  may not be
possible.19
Lead agency. The agency that provides the on-scene coordinator or remedial project manager
that will plan and implement response actions under the National Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA,
the U.S.  Coast Guard, another Federal agency, or a State may be the lead agency for a response
action. In the case of a release of a hazardous substance,  pollutant, or contaminant, where  the
release  is  on,  or the  sole source of the  release  is from, any facility or vessel under  the
jurisdiction, custody, or control of a Federal agency, that agency will be the lead agency.  Lead
agencies will operate under contract  or by cooperative agreement under Section 104(d)(l) of
CERCLA, or will  be designated by  a Superfund Memorandum of Agreement (SMOA) under
subpart F of the NCP or other agreements.4
Location of additional human receptors. For the purposes of the MEC HA, an input factor to
the MEC HA that applies to high explosives (i.e., bulk high explosives, or munitions filled with
high explosives), fragmented munitions that contain high explosives (i.e., 37 mm), and munitions
containing white phosphorus, and addresses the possibility that additional receptors, beyond  the
receptor that might cause an item to function, may be exposed to overpressure and fragmentation
hazards from the detonation of the item.
Maneuver area. Area used for conducting military exercises in  a simulated conflict area or war
zone. It can also be used  for other non-war simulations. Training aids and military munitions
simulators, such as  training ammunition, artillery  simulators,  smoke  grenades, pyrotechnics,
mine simulators, and riot control agents, are used in the maneuver area.
MEC (Munitions and explosives of concern). The term, which distinguishes specific categories
of military munitions that may pose unique explosive safety risks, may include (1) unexploded
ordnance (UXO) as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2710 (e)(9) and 40 CFR 266.201; (2) discarded military
munitions (DMM), as  defined  in 10  U.S.C. 2710 (e)(2);  (3) or munitions constituents (MC)
present in high enough  concentrations to pose an explosive hazard.8
Glossary

-------
                                                                     MEC HA Methodology
                                                                             October 2008
                                                                                 Page 68

MEC Classification. For the purposes of the MEC HA, this input factor is associated with  the
MEC HA sensitivity component. MEC items are described as bulk explosives, UXO or DMM,
and fuzed or unfuzed, and in terms of the sensitivity of the fuze.
MEC Depth. For the purposes of the MEC HA, MEC depth is the information required for  the
input factor  "Minimum  MEC Depth  Relative to the Maximum  Intrusive Depth" in  the
accessibility component. It is the level on or below ground surface at which MEC is found.
MEC Size. For the purposes of the MEC HA, this input factor in the sensitivity component
indicates the ease with which a MEC item can be moved by receptor activity.
Migration mechanism. For the purposes of the MEC HA, the natural physical forces in an MRS
(e.g., frost heave,  erosion, etc.) that can expose subsurface MEC items or move surface or
subsurface MEC items.
Migration potential.  For the  purposes of the MEC HA, an  input factor in the accessibility
category that is defined as the likelihood of MEC items to be moved by natural processes (e.g.,
erosion, frost heave, etc.).
Military munitions. All ammunition products  and components produced or used by or for  the
U.S. Department of Defense or the U.S. Armed Services for the national defense and  security,
including military  munitions under the control of the Department of Defense, the U.S. Coast
Guard,  the U.S. Department of Energy;  and  National  Guard Personnel. The  term  military
munitions includes confined gaseous, liquid,  and solid propellants,  explosives, pyrotechnics,
environmental contaminant munitions, rockets,  guided and ballistic missiles, bombs, warheads,
mortar rounds, artillery ammunition, small arms ammunition, grenades, mines, torpedoes, depth
charges, cluster munitions and dispensers, demolition charges, and devices and  components
thereof. The term does not include wholly inert items, improvised explosive devices, and nuclear
weapons, nuclear  devices, and nuclear components, other than  non-nuclear components of
nuclear devices that are managed under the nuclear weapons  program of the Department of
Energy  after  all required  sanitization operations under the Atomic  Energy Act of 1954 (42
U.S.C. 2011 etseq.)8
Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth. For the purposes of the MEC
HA, this input factor describes the minimum depth of the MEC items (e.g., on  the surface or
below the surface)  in relation to the maximum intrusive depth likely to occur from activities that
take place in that area.
Munitions constituents (MC). Any materials originating from unexploded ordnance, discarded
military munitions, including explosive and non-explosive materials, and emission, degradation,
or breakdown elements of such ordnance or munitions. (10 U.S.C. 2710 (e)(4)).8
Munitions response.  Means response actions, including  investigation, removal, and  remedial
actions  to address the explosives safety,  human health, or environmental risks presented  by
unexploded ordnance  (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM),  or munitions constituents
(MC), or to support a determination that no removal or remedial action is required.8
Munitions response area (MRA).  Any area  on a defense site that is known or suspected to
contain UXO, DMM,  or MC.  Examples include former ranges and munitions burial  areas. A
munitions area comprises one or more munitions response sites.8
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 69

Munitions response site (MRS). A discrete location within an MRA that is known to require a
munitions response.8
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (Protocol). A DoD protocol whose purpose
is  to  assign a relative priority for munitions response to each location  in the inventory of
munitions response sites known or suspected of containing unexploded  ordnance, discarded
military munitions, or munitions constituents.8
National  Oil  and  Hazardous  Substances  Pollution  Contingency  Plan,  or  National
Contingency Plan (NCP). The regulations for responding to releases and threatened releases of
hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants under CERCLA.4
Net explosive weight. The total  weight of all high explosives and all propellants, expressed in
pounds.5
Open burning (OB). The combustion of  any  material without control of combustion air to
maintain adequate temperature for efficient  combustion, without containment of the combustion
reaction in an enclosed device to  provide  sufficient residence  time and mixing for complete
combustion, and without control of emissions of the gaseous combustion products.
Open burning/open detonation (OB/OD)  area. Any area on an installation that was formally
designated for disposal of munitions by either open burning or open detonation.
Open detonation (OD). A environmental contaminant  process  used for the treatment of
unserviceable, obsolete, or waste munitions whereby an explosive donor charge initiates the
munitions to be  detonated.  Although  surface detonations  can be performed under  certain
circumstances, most munitions are treated in 4- to 6-foot-deep pits for safety purposes. OD sites
may be  permitted as miscellaneous units as part of the EPA permitting process for treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities.3
Potential Contact Hours. For the purposes  of the MEC HA,  this input  factor describes the
number of receptors and the amount of time each receptor spends in  the MRS.  This factor is
calculated on a yearly basis for activities that may result in exposure, that is, current and future
outdoor activities  that could bring receptors  into contact with MEC items. For cases where MEC
is  on the surface,  any outdoor activity could lead to exposure; for cases where MEC is  located
subsurface only, the activities in question must have an intrusive component (e.g., digging a fire
pit or latrine, or trail or fence maintenance).
Preliminary assessment (PA). Under CERCLA, PA involves  review of existing information
and a site reconnaissance,  if appropriate,  to determine if  a release may require additional
investigation or action.4
Propellant, solid. Explosive compositions used to propel projectiles and rockets and to generate
gases for powering auxiliary devices.11
Proximity. For the purposes of the MEC HA,  proximity  applies only to high explosives and
addresses the possibility that specific resources may be exposed  to overpressure   and/or
fragmentation hazards from the detonation of an item.
Pyrotechnics. Used to send signals, to illuminate areas of interest,  to simulate  other weapons
during training,  and  as  ignition elements  for  certain weapons.  When ignited, pyrotechnics
undergo  an energetic environmental  contaminant reaction  at  a controlled rate intended to
Glossary

-------
                                                                       MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                   Page 70

produce, on demand in various combinations, specific time delays or quantities of heat, noise,
smoke, light, or infrared radiation. 20
Range.  The term range, when used in a geographic sense, means a designated land or water area
that is set aside, managed, and used for range activities of the Department of Defense. The term
includes the following: (a) firing lines  and positions, maneuver  areas, firing lines,  test pads,
detonation pads, impact areas, electronic scoring sites, buffer zones with restricted access, and
exclusionary areas; (b) airspace areas designated for military use in accordance with regulations
and procedures  prescribed by the Administrator  of the  Federal Aviation Administration. (10
U.S.C. 101 (e)(3))21
Range fan. That part of the range that includes firing points, target areas, and buffer areas.
Receptor. Exposed  human  or ecological  individual  relative  to  the  exposure  pathway
considered.22
Release. Any  spilling, leaking,  pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting,
escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment (including the abandonment or
discarding of barrels, containers,  and  other closed receptacles  containing  any hazardous
substance or pollutant or contaminant).23
Remedial action (or Remedy). Those actions consistent with a permanent remedy taken instead
of, or in addition to,  a removal action in  the event of a release or threatened release  of a
hazardous  substance into  the environment,  to prevent or minimize the release  of hazardous
substances so  that they do not migrate  to cause substantial  danger to present of future public
health or welfare or the environment. (40 CFR 300.430(d)(l))4
Remedial  alternatives. Potential remedies  evaluated during  the  feasibility study  that  may
include the following:

   •   One or more alternatives that involve little or no treatment, but provide  protection  of
       human health  and  the environment primarily by  preventing or controlling exposure to
       hazardous substances, pollutants,  or contaminants,  through engineering  controls,  for
       example, containment, and, as necessary, institutional controls.

   •   For source control actions, an alternative  in which treatment that reduces the toxicity,
       mobility, or volume  of the hazardous substances,  pollutants, or  contaminants  is  a
       principal element.

   •   For groundwater response action, a limited number of remedial actions that attain site-
       specific  remediation  levels within  different  restoration time  periods.  (40 CFR
       300.430(d)(l))4
Remedial  investigation (RI). An investigation conducted for the purpose of collecting data
necessary to adequately  characterize the site for the purpose of developing and evaluating
effective remedial alternatives.  The RI  includes field investigations, treatability studies, and a
baseline risk assessment. (40 CFR 300.430 (d)(l)) 4
Removal action. Short-term response actions under CERCLA that address immediate threats to
public health and the environment. (40 CFR 300.415)23
Glossary

-------
                                                                      MEC HA Methodology
                                                                              October 2008
                                                                                  Page 71

Removal investigation (also called a Removal site evaluation). The investigation conducted to
see if removal action is necessary or appropriate. (40 CFR 300.410)23
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA). The Federal  statute that governs the
management of all hazardous waste from cradle to grave. RCRA covers requirements regarding
identification, management, and cleanup of waste, including (1) identification of when a waste is
solid or hazardous; (2) management of waste transportation, storage, treatment, and disposal; and
(3) corrective action, including investigation and cleanup, of old solid waste management units.24
Response action. As defined in Section 101 of CERCLA, remove, removal, remedy, or remedial
action, including enforcement activities related thereto.23
Risk. The product of the probability or frequency that an accident will occur within a certain
time and the accident's consequences to people, property, or the environment.5
Risk characterization (also  referred  to as  risk assessment). A process used to identify
potential  risks   posed  by  environmental   contaminants.  During   risk   characterization,
environmental  contaminant-specific toxicity  information,  combined  with  quantitative  and
qualitative information from the exposure assessment, is compared with measured contaminant
exposure levels  and to levels predicted through environmental fate  and transport  modeling.
These  comparisons determine whether concentrations of  contaminants at or near the  site are
affecting, or could potentially  affect, human health or the environment. Results of this analysis
are presented with all critical assumptions and uncertainties  so that significant risks can be
identified.4
Risk management. A process by which decision-makers reduce or offset risk.190
Rocket. A complete missile  that derives thrust from ejection of hot gases generated from
propellants carried in the missiles.11
Sensitivity. For the purposes of the MEC HA, a component of explosive hazard that reflects the
likelihood that a receptor will be able to interact with a MEC item such that it will detonate.
Sensitive UXO. For the purposes of the MEC HA, UXO items with fuzes that are more likely to
function with any movement (e.g., all-way-acting fuzes) or potential environmental conditions
(e.g., piezoelectric fuzes).
Severity. For the purposes of the MEC HA, a component of explosive hazard that reflects the
potential consequences (e.g.,  death, severe injury, property damage, etc.)  of the MEC  item
functioning.
Site Accessibility. For the purposes of the MEC HA, this input factor describes the ease  with
which  people can access an MRS. The input factor captures the contribution that such receptor
activities make to the likelihood that a receptor will encounter a MEC item.
Site inspection (SI). An on-site investigation to determine whether there is  a release or potential
release and the nature of the associated threats. The purpose is to augment the data collected in
the preliminary  assessment and to generate,  if  necessary, sampling and  other field  data to
determine if further action or investigation is appropriate.4
Glossary

-------
                                                                           MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                   October 2008
                                                                                        Page 72

Spotting charge. Most practice  or  training  munitions  contain a  small amount  of smoke-
producing material to facilitate locating that round during training activities. A few practice or
training munitions, such as bombs, may contain small amounts of high explosives.

Structure of hazard assessment. For the  purposes of the MEC HA,  the  interrelation of  the
various parts that make up the hazard assessment framework.

Surface.  For the purposes of the MEC HA, the position of a munitions that is (1) entirely or
partially exposed above the ground surface, or (2) entirely or partially exposed above the surface
of a water body (e.g., as a result of tidal activity).

Target impact area. A point on the range at which the munitions are fired.

Unexploded  ordnance (UXO).  Military munitions that have been primed,  fuzed,  armed, or
otherwise prepared for action, and have  been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in
such a manner as to constitute a hazard to operations, installation, personnel, or material and that
remain unexploded either by malfunction, design, or any other cause. (10 U.S.C. 101 (e)(5))5

White phosphorus (WP).  A bursting  smoke filler that is frequently used in munitions activity. It
burns rapidly when exposed to oxygen. In soils with low oxygen, unreacted white phosphorus
can lie dormant for years but may re-ignite if exposed to oxygen.

Sources:

    1.      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual "Guide to
           Manual." Directive 9234.2-02FS, September 1989.
    2.      ITRC. Technical/Regulatory Guidelines for Munitions Response Historical Records Review,
           November 2003. Available at: http://www.itrcweb.org.
    3.      Department of Defense. Policy to Implement the EPA 's Military Munitions Rule. July 1, 1998.

    4.      National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (National Contingency Plan), 40 CFR 300
           et seq.
    5.      Department of Defense 6055.9-STD, Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Safety
           Standards, October 5, 2004.

    6.      U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Conceptual Site Models for Ordnance and Explosives and Hazardous,
           Toxic and Radioactive Waste Projects, EM 1110-1-1200, February 3, 2003.

    7.      Department of Defense Directive 6055.9E. Explosives Safety Management and the DoD Explosives
           Safety Board, August 19, 2005.

    8.      Department of Defense. Military Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (Final Rule), 32
           CFR 179, Octobers, 2005.
    9.      U.S. Army Regulation 385-63 MCO P3570.1A, Policies and Procedures for Firing Ammunition for
           Training, Target Practice, and Combat, October 15, 1983.
    10.     Department of the Army. Safety Manual, AMC-R 385-100, September 1995.

    11.     U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design Ordnance and Explosives Response,
           Pamphlet No.  1110-1-18, April 24, 2000.

    12.     TB 700-2/NAVSEAINST 8020.8B/TO 11A-1-47/DLAR 8220.1, ,pp. 2-75, January 5, 1998.

    13.     Federal Advisory Committee for the Development of Innovative Technologies, Unexploded Ordnance
           (UXO): An Overview, Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division, UXO
           Countermeasures Department, October 1996.
Glossary

-------
                                                                                MEC HA Methodology
                                                                                         October 2008
                                                                                             Page 73

    14.      Department of Defense. Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D.

    15.      Department of Defense Directive Number 4715.11, Environmental and Explosives Safety Management
            on Operational Ranges within the United States, May 2004.

    16.      Department of the Army and the Air Force. Technical Manual No. 3-215 and Air Force Manual No.
            355.7, Military Chemistry and Environmental contaminant Agents, August 1956.

    17.      Department of the Army, Ammunition and Explosive Safety Standards-(DA PAM 385-64), December
            15, 1999.

    18.      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office. Institutional
            Controls and Transfer of Real Property Under CERCLA Section 120 (h)(3)(a), (b), or (c), Interim
            Final Guidance, January 2000.

    19.      Department of Defense. Management Guidance for Defense Environmental Program, Office of the
            Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment), September 2001.

    20.      Headquarters, Department of the Army. Pyrotechnic Simulators, TM 9-1370-207-10, March 31, 1991.

    21.      Department of Defense Definitions (Attachment B) provided bylOU.S.C.101 (FY 2004 National
            Defense Authorization Act).

    22.      U.S. EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 - Human Health Evaluation Manual
            (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, andReview of Superfund Risk Assessments), Interim,
            January 1998.

    23.      Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C.
            9601etseq.

    24.      Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
Glossary

-------
          APPENDIX A
AUTOMATED MEC HA WORKBOOK
(MECHA Automated Workbook V1.0.xls)

-------
This page intentionally left blank.

-------
              APPENDIX B




EXAMPLE MEC HA WORKSHEETS AND REPORT

-------
This page intentionally left blank.

-------
                                                                                                                    MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                         November 2006
 MEC HA Summary Information
                                                                                                Comments
Site ID:
Date:
Camp  Sample HEAT  Target  Area
 Please identify the single specific area to be assessed in this hazard assessment.  From this point forward, all
 references to "site" or "MRS" refer to the specific area that you have defined.
 A.  Enter a unique identifier for the site:
 Camp  Sample  HEAT Target Area
 Provide a list of information sources used for this hazard assessment. As you are completing the worksheets,
 use the "Select Ref(s)" buttons at the ends of each subsection to select the applicable information sources
 from the list below.
 Ref. No.   Title (include version, publication date)
        1
          Camp Sample Archive  Search  Report,  Final, 5/1999
          Camp Sample PA/SI Report,  Final,  5/2004
          Camp Sample RI/FS Work Plan,  Interim  Final,  5/2005
          Camp Sample Explosive Safety Submission,  Final, 4/2005
 B. Briefly describe the site:
 1. Area (include units):
 2. Past munitions-related use:
[Target  Area
3. Current land-use activities (list all that occur):
 Recreational  - Hiking, Wildlife  Research
 4. Are changes to the future land-use planned?
 5. What is the basis for the site boundaries?
  eophysical  survey  performed during  the remedial  investigation in  June,  2005.
6. How certain are the site boundaries?
 Reference(s) for Part B:

 Remedial Investigation Field Notes, 6-8/2005

 C.  Historical Clearances
 1.  Have there been any historical clearances at the site?
 2.  If a clearance occurred:
          a.  What year was the clearance performed?

          b. Provide a description of the clearance activity (e.g., extent, depth, amount of munitions-
          related items removed, types and sizes of removed items, and whether metal detectors were
 Reference(s) for Part C:

 Camp Sample Archive Search Report, Final, 5/1999
                                                      Select Ref(s)
Summary Info Worksheet
                                                                                            Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                            MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                  November 2006
D.  A ttach maps of the site below (select 'Insert/Picture' on the menu bar.)
Summary Info Worksheet                                                                                           Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                        MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                                                             November 2006
Site ID:    Camp Sample HEAT Target Area
Date:

Cased Munitions Information

                                                                                                                            Minimum
                                                                                           Is                               Depth for                 Comments (include rationale
          Munition Type (e.g., mortar,               Munition Size              Energetic Material  Munition                Fuze      Munition   Location of      for munitions that are
Item No.   projectile, etc.)              Munition Size Units        Mark/ Model  Type             Fuzed?   Fuzing Type   Condition  (ft)       Munitions       "subsurface only")
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Rockets



















2.36



















inches







































High Explosive



















Yes



















Impact



















Armed



















0



















Surface and
Subsurface







































Reference(s) for table above:
Camp Sample PA/SI Report, Final, 5/2004
Remedial Investigation Field Notes, 6-8/2005

Bulk Explosive Information
Item No.   Explosive Type              Comments
        1
Reference(s) for table above:
Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info Worksheet
                                                                                                                                                                           Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                    MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                          November 2006
Site ID:   Camp Sample HEAT Target Area
Date:

Activities Currently Occurring at the Site
Activity
No.       Activity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Hiking
Nature Trail/Park Area
Maintenance
Wildlife Research









2,500
100
48









4
8
8









                           Number of
            Number of      hours per year Potential
            people per year a single       Contact Time    Maximum
            who participate  person spends (receptor       intrusive
            in the activity   on the activity hours/year)     depth (ft) Comments
                                                                              10,000

                                                                                 800

                                                                                 384
Total Potential Contact Time (receptor hrs/yr):
                                                                              11,184
                                                     Maximum intrusive depth at site (ft):
Reference(s) for table above:
Camp Sample RI/FS Work Plan, Interim Final, 5/2005
Camp Sample Explosive Safety Submission, Final, 4/2005
                                                                   Select Ref(s)
Current and Future Activities Worksheet
                                                                                                       Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                                              MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                                   November 2006
Site ID:    Camp Sample HEAT Target Area
Date:

Planned Remedial or Removal Actions
Response
Action No. Response Action Description
Expected
Resulting                           Will land use activities
Minimum MEC   Expected Resulting    change if this response
Depth (ft)       Site Accessibility      action is implemented? What is the expected scope of cleanup?
Comments
Access/ Activity Change
Surface Clearance
Surface Clearance &





0
0.25
0.25

2 .5



Moderate
Accessibility
Full
Accessibility
Moderate

Full



Yes
No


No



No MEC cleanup
cleanup of MECs located on the
surface only
cleanup of MECs located on the

cleanup of MECs located both on











According to the 'Summary Info' worksheet, no future land uses are planned.  For those alternatives
where you answered 'No' in Column E, the land use activities will be assessed against current land uses.

Reference(s) for table above:
Camp Sample RI/FS Work Plan, Interim Final, 5/2005
Remedial Investigation Field Notes, 6-8/2005
                                                                                               Select Ref(s)
Remedial-Removal Action Worksheet
                                                                                                                                                 Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                              MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                   November 2006
Site ID:   Camp Sample HEAT Target Area
Date:

This worksheet needs to be completed for each remedial/removal action alternative listed in the 'Remedial-
Removal Action ' worksheet that will cause a change in land use.
Land Use Activities Planned After Response Alternative #1: Access/Activity Change
Activity
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Activity
Wildlife Research











Number of
people per year
who participate
in the activity
48











Number of
hours a single
person spends
on the activity
8











Potential
Contact Time
(receptor
hours/year)
384
Maximum
intrusive
depth (ft) Comments
0











2 researchers x
2 days /mo x 12
mos/yr











                       Total Potential Contact Time (receptor hrs/yr):          384
                                             Maximum intrusive depth at site (ft):
Reference(s) for table above:
                                                                                       Select Ref(s)
Post-Response Land Use Worksheet
Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                     November 2006
Land Use Activities Planned After Response Alternative #3: Surface Clearance &
Access/Activity Change
Activity
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Activity
Wildlife Research











Number of
people per year
who participate
in the activity
48











Number of
hours a single
person spends
on the activity
8











Potential
Contact Time
(receptor
hours/year)
384











Maximum
intrusive
depth (ft)
0











Comments
2 researchers x
2 days /mo x 12
mos/yr











                       Total Potential Contact Time (receptor hrs/yr):           384
                                              Maximum intrusive depth at site (ft):
Reference(s) for table above:
                                                                                        Select Ref(s)
Post-Response Land Use Worksheet
Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                          MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                               November 2006
Site ID:
Date:
                     Camp
                     Sample
                     HEAT
                     Target Area
 Energetic Material Type Input Factor Categories
 The following table is used to determine scores associated with the energetic materials.  Materials
 are listed in order from most hazardous to least hazardous.
                                                      Baseline
                                                                                                            Comments
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting
Rounds
White Phosphorus
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting Charge
Incendiary
Conditions

    100
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
Surface
Cleanup

   100
   70
   60
   50
   40
   30
Subsurface
Cleanup

     100
     70
     60
     50
     40
     30
The most hazardous type of energetic material listed in the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info'
Worksheet falls under the category 'High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting
Rounds'.                                                                               Score

Baseline Conditions:                                                                             100
Surface Cleanup:                                                                               100
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                            100
 Location of Additional Human Receptors Input Factor Categories
 1. What is the Explosive Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) from the Explosive Siting Plan or the
 Explosive Safety Submission for the MRS?
 2. Are there currently any features or facilities where people may congregate within the MRS, or
 within the ESQD arc?
 3. Please  describe the facility or feature.
I
 MEC Item(s) used to calculate the  ESQD for current use activities

 Item #1. Rockets (2.36inches, High Explosive)
 The following table  is used to determine scores associated with the location of additional human
 receptors (current use activities):
                                                     Baseline    Surface   Subsurface
                                                     Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup
          Inside the MRS or inside the ESQD arc                   30       30           30
                Outside of the ESQD arc                          000
                                             feet
4. Current use activities are 'Outside of the ESQD arc', based on Question 2.'
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:
                                                                                       Score
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                            Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                         MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                              November 2006
 Site Accessibility Input Factor Categories
 The following table is used to determine scores associated with site accessibility:
                                                     Baseline    Surface    Subsurface
                                Description            Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup
                        No barriers to entry, including
 Full Accessibility             signage but no fencing               80        80           i
 Moderate Accessibility
 Limited Accessibility
Very Limited
Accessibility
  Some barriers to entry, such as
barbed wire fencing or rough terrain
Significant barriers to entry, such as
   unguarded chain link fence or
     requirements for special
  transportation to reach the site
A site with guarded chain link fence
   or terrain that requires special
  equipment and skills (e.g., rock
       climbing) to access
                                                             55        55
                                                              15        15
                                                                                    55
                                                                                    15
 Current Use Activities                                                               Score
 Select the category that best describes the site accessibility under the current use scenario:
[Full Accessibility
 Baseline Conditions:                                                                              80
 Surface Cleanup:                                                                                80
 Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             80

 Future Use Activities
 Select the category that best describes the site accessibility under the future  use scenario:	
I                                                                                      I
 Baseline Conditions:
 Surface Cleanup:
 Subsurface Cleanup:

 Reference(s) for above information:
                                                                                        Select Ref(s)
 Response Alternative No. 1: Access/Activity Change
 Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, this alternative will
 lead to 'Moderate Accessibility'.
 Baseline Conditions:                                                                              55
 Surface Cleanup:                                                                                55
 Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             55

 Response Alternative No. 2: Surface Clearance
 Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, this alternative will
 lead to 'Full Accessibility'.
 Baseline Conditions:                                                                              80
 Surface Cleanup:                                                                                80
 Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             80

 Response Alternative No. 3: Surface Clearance & Access/Activity Change
 Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, this alternative will
 lead to 'Moderate Accessibility'.
 Baseline Conditions:                                                                              55
 Surface Cleanup:                                                                                55
 Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             55

 Response Alternative No. 4: Subsurface Clearance
 Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, this alternative will
 lead to 'Full Accessibility'.
 Baseline Conditions:                                                                              80
 Surface Cleanup:                                                                                80
 Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             80
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                           Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                        MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                             November 2006
Potential Contact Hours Input Factor Categories

The following table is used to determine scores associated with the total potential contact time:
                                                     Baseline     Surface   Subsurface
                               Description            Conditions   Cleanup   Cleanup
Many Hours               >1,000,000 receptor-hrs/yr            120       90           30

Some Hours           100,000 to 999,999 receptor hrs/yr          70       50           20

Few Hours             10,000 to 99,999 receptor-hrs/yr           40       20           10
Very Few Hours            < 10,000 receptor-hrs/yr               15       10            5
Current Use Activities:

Input factors are only determined for baseline conditions for current use activities. Based on the               receptor
'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet, the Total Potential Contact Time is:                        11,184 hrs/yr
Based on the table above, this corresponds to a input factor score for baseline conditions of:                40 Score
           Activities:

Input factors are only determined for baseline conditions for future use activities. Based on the                receptor
'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet, the Total Potential Contact Time is:                               hrs/yr
Based on the table above, this corresponds to a input factor score of:                                      Score
Response Alternative No. 1: Access/Activity Change
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
change if this alternative is implemented.
Total Potential Contact Time, based on the contact time listed for this alternative (see
'Post-Response Land Use' Worksheet)                                                        384
Based on the table above, this corresponds to input factor scores of:                            Score
Baseline Conditions:                                                                             15
Surface Cleanup:                                                                                10
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                              5
Response Alternative No. 2: Surface Clearance
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
not change if this alternative is implemented.
Total Potential Contact Time, based on the contact time listed for current use activities
(see 'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet)                                            11,184
Based on the table above, this corresponds to input factor scores of:                            Score
Baseline Conditions:                                                                             40
Surface Cleanup:                                                                                20
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             10
Response Alternative No. 3: Surface Clearance & Access/Activity Change
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
change if this alternative is implemented.
Total Potential Contact Time, based on the contact time listed for this alternative (see
'Post-Response Land Use' Worksheet)                                                        384
Based on the table above, this corresponds to input factor scores of:                            Score
Baseline Conditions:                                                                             15
Surface Cleanup:                                                                                10
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                              5
Response Alternative No. 4: Subsurface Clearance
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
not change if this alternative is implemented.
Total Potential Contact Time, based on the contact time listed for current use activities
(see 'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet)                                            11,184
Based on the table above, this corresponds to input factor scores of:                            Score
Baseline Conditions:                                                                             40
Surface Cleanup:                                                                                20
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                             10
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                           Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                                MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                      November 2006
 Amount of MEC Input Factor Categories

 The following table is used to determine scores associated with the Amount of MEC:
                                                        Baseline     Surface
                                  Description            Conditions   Cleanup
                       Areas at which munitions fire was
                                   directed
                      Sites where munitions were disposed
                       of by open burn or open detonation
                       methods. This category refers to
                       the core activity area of an OB/OD
                       area. See the "Safety Buffer Areas"
                       category for safety fans and kick-
                                    outs.
                                                                             Subsurface
                                                                             Cleanup
Target Area
OB/OD Area
 Function Test Range




 Burial Pit


 Maneuver Areas




 Firing Points





 Safety Buffer Areas





 Storage
 Explosive-Related
 Industrial Facility
                       Areas where the serviceability of
                         stored munitions or weapons
                       systems are tested. Testing may
                          include components, partial
                      functioning or complete functioning
                      of stockpile or developmental items.

                        The location of a burial of large
                           quantities of MEC items.
                       Areas used for conducting military
                      exercises in a simulated conflict area
                                 or war zone

                      The location from which a projectile,
                        grenade, ground signal, rocket,
                      guided missile, or other device is to
                       be ignited, propelled, or released.

                       Areas outside of target areas, test
                       ranges, or OB/OD areas that were
                      designed to act as a safety zone to
                       contain munitions that do not hit
                      targets or to contain kick-outs from
                                OB/OD areas.
                       Any facility used for the storage of
                       military munitions, such as earth-
                       covered magazines, above-ground
                       magazines, and open-air storage
                                   areas.
                      Former munitions manufacturing or
                         demilitarization sites and TNT
                              production plants
                                                               180
                                                               180
                                                                          120
                                                                          110
                                                                                        30
                                                                                        30
                                                                165        90
140       140


115        15
                                                                                        25
10


 5
 75
           10
 30        10
 25        10
 20        10
 Select the category that best describes the most hazardous amount of MEC:
[Target Area
 Baseline Conditions:
 Surface Cleanup:
 Subsurface Cleanup:
                                                                                           Score
                                                                                                  180
                                                                                                  120
                                                                                                   30
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                                  Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                   MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                        November 2006
Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth Input
Factor Categories
Current Use Activities

The shallowest minimum MEC depth, based on the 'Cased Munitions Information' Worksheet:
The deepest intrusive depth:
The table  below is used to determine scores associated with the minimum MEC depth relative to
the maximum intrusive depth:
                                                   Baseline    Surface    Subsurface
                                                   Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface.
After Cleanup: Intrusive  depth overlaps with subsurface
MEC.                                                      240       150          95
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface,
After Cleanup: Intrusive  depth does not overlap with
subsurface MEC.                                             240        50          25
Baseline Condition: MEC located only subsurface.  Baseline
Condition  or After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with
minimum  MEC depth.                                        150       N/A          95
Baseline Condition: MEC located only subsurface.  Baseline
Condition  or After Cleanup: Intrusive depth does not overlap
with minimum MEC depth.                                     50       N/A          25

Because  the shallowest minimum MEC depth is less than or equal to the deepest
intrusive depth, the intrusive depth will overlap after cleanup. MECs are located at
both the surface and subsurface, based on the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info'
Worksheet. Therefore, the category for this input factor is 'Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface. After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with
subsurface MEC.' For 'Current Use Activities', only Baseline Conditions are considered.
Future Use Activities
Deepest intrusive
depth:
Not enough information has been entered to determine the input factor category.
Response Alternative No. 1: Access/Activity Change
Expected minimum MEC depth (from the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet):
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
change if this alternative is implemented.
Maximum Intrusive Depth, based on the maximum intrusive depth listed for this
alternative (see 'Post-Response Land Use' Worksheet)
Because the shallowest minimum MEC depth is less than or equal to the deepest
intrusive depth, the intrusive depth overlaps. MECs are located at both the surface and
subsurface, based on the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet. Therefore, the
category for this input factor is 'Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and
subsurface. After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC.'

Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:
Response Alternative No. 2: Surface Clearance
Expected minimum MEC depth (from the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet):
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
not change if this alternative is implemented.
Maximum Intrusive Depth, based on the maximum intrusive depth listed for current
use activities (see 'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet)
Because the shallowest minimum MEC depth is less than or equal to the deepest
intrusive depth, the intrusive depth overlaps. MECs are located at both the surface and
subsurface, based on the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet. Therefore, the
category for this input factor is 'Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and
subsurface. After Cleanup: Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC.'
         Oft
         2ft
       240 Score
                                                                                             Score
         Oft
         Oft
Score
       240
      0.25 ft
         2ft
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                      Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                 MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                       November 2006
                                                                                  Score
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:                                                                           150
Subsurface Cleanup:
Response Alternative No. 3: Surface Clearance & Access/Activity Change
Expected minimum MEC depth (from the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet):             0.25 ft
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
change if this alternative is implemented.
Maximum Intrusive Depth, based on the maximum intrusive depth listed for this
alternative (see 'Post-Response Land Use' Worksheet)                                         0 ft
Because the shallowest minimum MEC depth is greater than the deepest intrusive
depth, the intrusive depth does not overlap.  MECs are located at both the surface and
subsurface, based on the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet. Therefore, the
category for this input factor is 'Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and
subsurface. After Cleanup: Intrusive depth does not overlap with subsurface MEC.'
                                                                                  Score
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:                                                                            50
Subsurface Cleanup:
Response Alternative No. 4: Subsurface Clearance
Expected minimum MEC depth (from the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet):              2.5 ft
Based on the 'Planned Remedial or Removal Actions' Worksheet, land use activities will
not change if this alternative is implemented.
Maximum Intrusive Depth, based on the maximum intrusive depth listed for current
use activities (see 'Current and Future Activities' Worksheet)                                   2 ft
Because the shallowest minimum MEC depth is greater than the deepest intrusive
depth, the intrusive depth does not overlap.  MECs are located at both the surface and
subsurface, based on the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet. Therefore, the
category for this input factor is 'Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and
subsurface. After Cleanup: Intrusive depth does not overlap with subsurface MEC.'
                                                                                  Score
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:                                                                          25
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                     Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                         MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                               November 2006
Migration Potential Input Factor Categories
Is there any physical or historical evidence that indicates it is possible for natural physical forces in
the area (e.g., frost heave, erosion) to expose subsurface MEC items, or move surface or
subsurface MEC items?
If "yes", describe the nature of natural forces.  Indicate key areas of potential migration (e.g.,
overland water flow) on a map as appropriate (attach a map to the bottom of this sheet, or as a
separate worksheet).	
                                                "            ^^^^^^^^
The following table is used to determine scores associated with the migration potential:
                                                     Baseline    Surface    Subsurface
                                                     Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup
Possible                                                      30       30           10
Unlikely                                                      10       10           10

Based on the question above, migration potential is 'Unlikely.'                           Score
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:

Reference(s) for above information:
           10
           10
           10
MEC Classification Input Factor Categories
Cased munitions information has been inputed into the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info'
Worksheet; therefore, bulk explosives do not comprise all MECs for this MRS.

The 'Amount of MEC' category is Target Area'.  It cannot be automatically assumed
that the MEC items from this category are DMM. Therefore, the conservative
assumption is that the MEC items in this MRS are UXO.
Has a technical assessment shown that MEC in the OB/OD Area is DMM?
Are any of the munitions listed in the'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet:
                     1 Submunitions
                     1 Rifle-propelled 40mm projectiles (often called 40mm grenades)
                     1 Munitions with white phosphorus filler
                     1 High explosive anti-tank (HEAT) rounds
                     1 Hand grenades
                     1 Mortars
At least one item listed in the 'Munitions, Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet was identified as
'fuzed'.
The following table is used to determine scores associated with MEC classification categories:
                                                      Baseline    Surface    Subsurface
                             UXO Special Case          Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup
UXO Special Case                                              180      180          180
UXO                                                         110      110          110
Fuzed DMM Special Case                                        105      105          105
Fuzed DMM                                                   55       55           55
Unfuzed DMM                                                 45       45           45
Bulk Explosives                                                45       45           45
Based on your answers above, the MEC classification is 'UXO Special Case'.
Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:

MEC Size Input Factor Categories
The following table is used to determine scores associated with MEC Size:
                                                     Baseline    Surface   Subsurface
                                Description            Conditions  Cleanup   Cleanup

                     Any munitions (from the 'Munitions,
                       Bulk Explosive Info' Worksheet)
                     weigh less than 90 Ibs; small enough
                      for a receptor to be able to move
Small                     and initiate a detonation               40        40
                      All munitions weigh more than 90
                       Ibs; too large to move without
Large                           equipment                      0         0
Based on the definitions above and the types of munitions at the site (see 'Munitions, Bulk
Explosive Info' Worksheet), the MEC Size Input Factor is:

Baseline Conditions:
Surface Cleanup:
Subsurface Cleanup:
                                                                                       Score
          180
          180
          180
40
   Score
           40
           40
           40
Input Factors Worksheet
                                                                                                                            Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
Scoring Summary
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      November 2006
Site ID: Camp Sample HEAT Target Area
Date:
Input Factor
I. Energetic Material Type
II. Location of Additional Human Receptors
III. Site Accessibility
IV. Potential Contact Hours
V. Amount of MEC
VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive
Depth
VII. Migration Potential
VIII. MEC Classification
IX. MEC Size

a. Scoring Summary for Current Use Activities
Response Action Cleanup: No Response Action
Input Factor Category
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting Rounds
Outside of the ESQD arc
Full Accessibility
10,000 to 99,999 receptor-hrs/yr
Parget Area
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface. After Cleanup:
Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC.
Unlikely
UXO Special Case
Small
Total Score
Hazard Level Category
Score
IOC
0
8C
4C
18C
240
1C
18C
4C
870
1
imp Sample HEAT Target Area
ite:






VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive




Response Action Cleanup: No Response Action










Total Score












Scoring Summaries Worksheet
                                                                                                                                                                                                   Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      November 2006
Site ID:
Date:

Camp Sample HEAT Target Area

Input Factor
I. Energetic Material Type
II. Location of Additional Human Receptors
III. Site Accessibility
IV. Potential Contact Hours
V
. Amount of MEC
VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive
Depth
VII
Migration Potential
VIII. MEC Classification
IX. MEC Size


Response Action Cleanup:
Input Factor Category
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting Rounds
Outside of the ESQD arc
Moderate Accessibility
<10,000 receptor-hrs/yr
Target Area
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface. After Cleanup:
Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC.
Unlikely
UXO Special Case
Small
Total Score
Hazard Level Category
No MEC cleanup
Score
IOC
0
55
15
18C
240
1C
18C
4C
820
2
Site ID:
Date:

Camp Sample HEAT Target Area

Input Factor
I. Energetic Material Type
II. Location of Additional Human Receptors
III. Site Accessibility
IV. Potential Contact Hours
V. Amount of MEC
VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive
Depth
VII
Migration Potential
VIII. MEC Classification
IX. MEC Size

d. Scoring Summary for Response Alternative 2: Surface Clearance
Response Action Cleanup:
Input Factor Category
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting Rounds
Outside of the ESQD arc
Full Accessibility
10,000 to ceptor-hrs/yr
Parget Area
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface. After Cleanup:
Intrusive depth overlaps with subsurface MEC.
Unlikely
UXO Special Case
Small
Total Score
Hazard Level Category

cleanup of MECs located on the
surface only
Score
IOC
0
8C
2C
12C
150
1C
18C
4C
700
3
Scoring Summaries Worksheet
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      November 2006
Site ID:
Date:

Camp Sample HEAT Target Area

Input Factor
I. Energetic Material Type
II. Location of Additional Human Receptors
III. Site Accessibility
IV. Potential Contact Hours
V
. Amount of MEC
VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive
Depth
VII
Migration Potential
VIII. MEC Classification
IX. MEC Size

e. Scoring Summary for Response Alternative 3: Surface Clearance &
Response Action Cleanup:
Input Factor Category
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting Rounds
Outside of the ESQD arc
Moderate Accessibility
<10,000 receptor-hrs/yr
Parget Area
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface, After Cleanup:
Intrusive depth does not overlap with subsurface MEC.
Unlikely
UXO Special Case
Small
Total Score
Hazard Level Category
Access/ Activity Change
cleanup of MECs located on the
surface only
Score
IOC
0
55
1C
12C
50
1C
18C
4C
565
3
Site ID:
Date:

Camp Sample HEAT Target Area

Input Factor
I. Energetic Material Type
II. Location of Additional Human Receptors
III. Site Accessibility
IV. Potential Contact Hours
V
. Amount of MEC
VI. Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive
Depth
VII
Migration Potential
VIII. MEC Classification
IX. MEC Size

f. Scoring Summary for Response Alternative 4: Subsurface Clearance
Response Action Cleanup:
Input Factor Category
High Explosive and Low Explosive Filler in Fragmenting Rounds
Outside of the ESQD arc
=ull Accessibility
10,000 to 99,999 receptor-hrs/yr
Target Area
Baseline Condition: MEC located surface and subsurface, After Cleanup:
Intrusive depth does not overlap with subsurface MEC.
Unlikely
UXO Special Case
Small
Total Score
Hazard Level Category
cleanup of MECs located both on the
surface and subsurface
Score
IOC
0
8C
1C
3C
25
1C
18C
4C
475
4
Scoring Summaries Worksheet
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
                                                                                                                                              MEC HA Workbook vl.O
                                                                                                                                                     November 2006
MEC HA Hazard Level Determination
Site ID: Area
Date:

a. Current Use Activities

c. Response Alternative 1: Access/ Activity Change
d. Response Alternative 2: Surface Clearance
Change
f. Response Alternative 4: Subsurface Clearance
g. Response Alternative 5:
h. Response Alternative 6:
Hazard Level Category
1







Score
87C

82C
700
565
475


Characteristics of the MRS
Is critical infrastructure located within the MRS or within the
ESQD arc?
Are cultural resources located within the MRS or within the ESQD
arc?
Are significant ecological resources located within the MRS or
within the ESQD arc?
No
No
No
Hazard Level Worksheet
                                                                                                                              Public Review Draft - Do Not Cite or Quote

-------
             APPENDIX C




ANSWERS TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

-------
This page intentionally left blank.

-------
 Frequently Asked Questions for Munitions and Explosives of Concern Hazard Assessment
                                      (MEC HA)

1. Why was the MEC HA developed?
The MEC HA was developed for a number of reasons:


   •   Because there was no universally accepted process to assess explosive safety hazards.
       The existing process to assess chemical risks is not suitable for assessing the explosive
       safety hazards associated with MEC.

   •   To  meet the  National Contingency Plan  (NCP) directions  for  site-specific risk
       assessments under CERCLA, when applied to sites containing MEC. A fundamental part
       of the CERCLA process is  the use of a risk assessment to  facilitate understanding of
       whether and what kinds of actions should be undertaken.

   •   To provide a process for evaluating explosive hazards at a variety of munitions response
       sites (MRS), thereby saving project team resources that otherwise would have been
       applied to develop other site-specific hazard assessment tools.

   •   To provide  a nationally recognized,  uniform process to evaluate MRS conditions and
       support confidence in decision-making.

   •   To provide a transparent process to facilitate communication among project teams and
       stakeholders.

   •   Because EPA, DoD, Federal Land Managers, Tribal interests, and States agreed that a
       consensus methodology would be a valuable tool to support CERCLA Response Actions
       for MEC.

2. What are the expected benefits of the MEC HA?
In addition to meeting the NCP directions for a risk assessment appropriate to the requirements
of a site, the implementation of a common technical framework for a MEC HA is expected to
provide substantial benefits at both the project team and national program level.  It is designed to
save both time and money in the investigation and decision-making process for a MRS. It is also
designed to facilitate communication by contributing to a common understanding within project
team and among other stakeholders of the nature of the hazard present, and the options for
addressing that hazard.  For project teams, the MEC HA is designed to:

   •   Provide a uniform process for multiple MRSs. Repeated use of the MEC HA by project
       teams should reduce costs and streamline oversight.
   •   Support the systematic planning process.
   •   Focus investigations on key data that should be collected to support decisions.
   •   Shorten the time-frame and costs to support site  management  decisions with a consistent
       process.

-------
   •   Facilitate  site-specific  response decisions, including the  evaluation of  removal or
       remedial  alternatives  and  identification of  reasonably  anticipated  future  land use
       activities.

At the national program level, the MEC HA is designed to:

          •  Increase confidence in project team decisions due to consistent approach and
             applications.

          •  Promote cost and time savings, which in turn will mean that more funds freed up
             for cleanup across the country.
3. When is the MEC HA Used in the CERCLA Process?
The principle use of the MEC HA is after a removal investigation or remedial investigation and
during the development of an engineering evaluation/cost evaluation (EE/C A) or feasibility
study (FS).
For removal investigations and evaluations in the EE/CA report, the MEC HA is designed to
support the following CERCLA removal authority activities:

   •   Evaluation of baseline explosive safety hazard conditions.

   •   Input to evaluation of removal alternatives criteria (implementability, effectiveness).
For remedial investigations and evaluations, the MC HA is designed to support the following
CERCLA remedial authority activities:

   •   Evaluation of baseline explosive safety hazard conditions.

   •   Input to evaluation of remedial alternatives criteria (threshold and balancing criteria).
The MEC HA process may be helpful at several other steps in the CERCLA process.

•  After Removal or Remedial Action Completion — It may be useful to rerun the MEC HA at
   the completion of a removal or remedial action if the cleanup objectives of the selected
   actions were not achieved; or if site conditions (e.g., land use activities) changed; or new
   information became available after the action was completed.

   •   As Part of Five Year Review Process — The MEC HA can support evaluating the
       continued effectiveness of a remedy. This can include the impact of changes in land use
       activities and the effectiveness of land use controls. If conditions have not changed, it
       should not be necessary to rerun the MEC HA.  If conditions have changed, project teams
       may find it to be useful to do so.
   •   As Part of the CERCLA Closeout Process. The MEC HA can support  evaluations for
       CERCLA closeout determinations.

4. Will an environmental chemical risk assessment also be required for an MRS?
Yes, if there is evidence of the  presence  of munitions constituents  or  other environmental
contaminants. The chemical risk assessment processes should  be used to assess the potential

-------
risks  to  human health and  the  environment  from munitions  constituents. The MEC HA
Methodology  is separate and  distinct  from those  processes and does  not  affect the risk
assessment processes.

5. Does the MEC HA analysis provide the answer to the question of "how clean is clean"?
No, the MEC HA does not provide the answer to "how clean is clean?". It provides input to the
CERCLA  removal  and  remedial criteria evaluation  and  the  associated  remedy  selection
processes. It is the  site-specific project teams that will evaluate and recommend site management
decisions to address site risks and hazards.

6. How are land use controls addressed in the MEC HA?
Land use controls are addressed through four input factors: Site Accessibility, Distance between
Additional Receptors and Explosive  Hazard, Potential  Contact Hours, and Minimum MEC
Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth (of receptor activities). For example:

   •   Land use control can affect the location of places where people congregate (add or
       remove them) that puts them in range of an explosive hazard.
   •   Site accessibility categories may change with the addition of different kinds offences or
       other controls.
   •   Assumptions about intrusive activities may be affected if land use or institutional controls
       impose limits on the types of activities that can take place on the land.
   •   Assumptions about the number of people on the site each year who could initiate an
       explosion may change with the application of land use  controls.

7. How were the scoring and weighting of the input factors developed?
The scoring and weighting factors were developed through a combination of professional
judgment, outreach and feedback through consultations, pilot testing with established project
teams, and a series of technical sensitivity analyses that are presented in Appendix D of the MEC
HA Methodology.
8. Why are some components and input factors weighted differently?
There are a number of reasons for different weights. First, they reflect the relative importance of
each input factor in evaluating the explosive hazard as determined by the work group. Second,
the weights were  modified based  an  extensive series of sensitivity analyses of the  technical
framework.
The input factor weights help distinguish between the effects of different removal or remedial
alternatives at the site-specific level.  The input factor weights balance the input factors  that do
not change with the input factors that  do change in response  to a cleanup, and the input factors
that change in response to a change in land use activities.
9. Is the  MEC HA used to evaluate the priority of future munitions responses for MRS
sites?
No, that is the role  of the Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol.

-------
10. What is the relationship between the MEC HA and the Munitions Response Site
Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP)?
The MEC HA  and the Protocol serve different and distinct purposes  in the management of
Munitions Response Sites (MRS). The  structure and  organization of both  tools reflect these
differences. The purpose of the Protocol is to prioritize MRS  response actions on a national
level.  The Protocol is first applied after the CERCLA preliminary assessment.

The purpose of the MEC HA is to assist in the evaluation and selection of removal and remedial
alternatives, including land use controls. This occurs at the EE/CA for removal actions and at the
RI/FS for remedial actions.

The MEC HA and the Protocol use much of the same or similar site data. The following table
illustrates the relationships between the Protocol data elements and the MEC HA input factors.
Protocol EHE Data Element
Munitions Type
Source of Hazard
Information on Location of
Munitions
Ease of Access
Status of Property
Population Density
Population Near Hazard
Types of Activities/ Structures
Ecological and /or Cultural
Resources
No related EHE Data Element
Related MEC HA Input
Factors
Energetic Material Type
MEC Classification
Amount of MEC
Minimum MEC Depth Relative
to the Maximum Receptor
Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
Site Accessibility
No related MEC HA Input
Factor
Potential Contact Hours
Location of Additional Human
Receptors
Potential Contact Hours
Minimum MEC Depth Relative
to the Maximum Receptor
Intrusive Depth
Potential Contact Hours
No related MEC HA Input
Factor
MEC Size
Remarks
EHE Data Element
classifications combine the two
MEC HA Input Factors

EHE Data Element
classifications address both the
MEC depth (surface or
subsurface) and the stability of
the MRS





MEC HA guidance recommends
that presence of ecological or
cultural resources be addressed
during CERCLA nine criteria
analysis


-------
11. How does the MEC HA address potential explosive safety hazards to cultural and
ecological resources or critical infrastructure?
The MEC HA only assesses explosive hazards to human receptors. When  cultural, ecological
resources or critical infrastructure are present at or near an MRS, the MEC HA Methodology
recommends that project teams evaluate the potential for damage to the resources through the
response process. This  evaluation  should include an analysis of location-specific and action-
specific  applicable  or relevant and appropriate  requirements  (ARARs) in the planning and
evaluation of investigations and removal/remedial actions. The MEC HA process incorporates
the calculation of a hazardous fragmentation distances that can  be used to determine if cultural
and ecological resources or critical infrastructure may be subject to fragmentation damage.

12. Do the results of the MEC HA establish a threshold for either action or no action at an
MRS?

No, the MEC HA provides information to support the decision-making process, but it is not the
decision itself. The results of the MEC HA do not establish or infer a threshold above which
action is required, or one below which no action is required.

-------
                    APPENDIX D

REPORT ON THE TECHNICAL BASIS FOR MEC HA INPUT FACTOR
        SCORES, WEIGHTING, AND HAZARD LEVELS

-------
This page intentionally left blank.

-------
      Appendix D: Report on the Technical Basis for Munitions and
     Explosives of Concern Hazard Assessment Input Factor Scores,
                       Weighting, and Hazard Levels
Purpose
This report was prepared to document the process and rationale that was used to develop
the scores and weightings for the Input Factors, as well as the scoring ranges associated
with the Hazard Levels. Together, these form the basis of the technical framework of the
MEC HA Methodology document.
Introduction
The MEC HA Methodology document includes descriptions of the technical framework,
data requirements to use the  MEC  HA  effectively,  and the use of the MEC HA in
evaluating baseline  conditions and potential removal  and remedial  action alternatives
under CERCLA. The development of the technical framework  was an iterative process
undertaken by the MEC HA technical working group  (TWG).  That  group consists of
personnel representing the U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, Department of
Defense, the U.S. Department of the Interior, States, and Tribal organizations. The TWG
initially evaluated a variety of framework options, input factors, and scoring approaches.
Those evaluations  are described  in a series  of  Issue  Papers that are part of the
development  record for the MEC HA Methodology document. The  Issue Papers and
other      MEC      HA       materials       can       be      viewed      at
http:www.epa.gov/fedfac/documents/hazard_assess_wrkgrp.htm.  Appendix D describes
the activities  undertaken by the TWG to develop and evaluate the technical framework
that was selected and is presented in the MEC HA Methodology  document. The technical
framework for the MEC HA consists of three elements:

•   Input Factors: Input factors are site characteristics that describe explosive hazards.
    Each input factor has two or more categories that allow project teams to describe the
    site-specific explosive hazard conditions.

•   Structure: The structure consists of the relative weights assigned to each input factor,
    the individual scores assigned to each input factor category, and the method used to
    combine the input factor category scores. The MEC HA scores range from a total of
    125 to 1000. A simple additive model was selected as the combination method.

•   Output: The output describes the explosive Hazard Level of the site. Hazard Levels
    map the scores to broad ranges in which the  explosive hazard for different sites and
    site conditions are reflective of relative conditions.
Three of the primary tasks completed during the development of the MEC HA were to
determine input factor weights, the scores for each  individual input factor category, and
score ranges for the Hazard Levels that would allow the MEC HA framework to meet
performance criteria laid out at the beginning of the development process.  This report
documents the procedures used to accomplish these tasks.

The MEC HA framework can be thought of as a model of  the site conditions  that
determine the relative level  of explosive hazard. This model was structured to capture
the collective judgment of the  TWG, as well as input from external reviewers, about the

-------
relative contribution of each of the  input factors to overall explosive hazard,  and the
relative hazard of each input factor category.  These judgments are captured in the
numeric weights assigned to each input factor and the numeric scores assigned to each
input factor category.  These numbers have meaning only in relation to one another, and
should not be construed as absolute measures of explosive hazard.

The TWG also  developed the description of the characteristics associated with  each
Hazard Level.  The relative weights and scores  were calibrated along with the Hazard
Level score ranges to ensure that the site conditions appropriate to each Hazard Level fell
within that Hazard Level.   The TWG undertook numerous  deliberations on  specific
categories, weights, and scores.  In addition, two calibration efforts were undertaken at
key points in the  development of the technical  framework. The first effort  was from
August 2004  to February  2005.  The  second effort was  from August 2005  through
November 2005. Both of these efforts are described below.

The following text describes specific issues that were considered during the development
of the input factor weights, the  input factor category scores, and the Hazard Level ranges.
Considerations in Determining Input Factor Weights
The approach to determining the weights for the  MEC HA input factors  was selected to
best meet the following two structure element performance criteria:

•   The scores and weights assigned to input factors reflect the relative contribution of
    each factor to the overall site Hazard Levels.

•   The method(s) used to combine input factors to assess the site-specific Hazard Levels
    accurately captures the effects of the interactions between input factors.

In determining input factor weights, it was useful to categorize the input factors in terms
of the  degree to which it was  likely that an input  factor score would change after as a
result of a removal or remedial action.  Scores for some of the input factors will always
stay the  same, scores for others will  change after  cleanup, and others will change
depending on land use activities including those affected by land use controls (LUCs).

•   Input Factors with scores that will not change  The input factor scores that will
    not change after cleanup are Energetic Material Type, Location of Additional Human
    Receptors, Site Accessibility, MEC Classification, and MEC Size.  For example, a
    site with High Explosive (HE) will not have a  reduction in score from Baseline
    Conditions to Surface Cleanup or Subsurface Cleanup. This is structured in this
    manner to address the lack  of certainty that all items containing HE can be found with
    current technologies.
    Input Factors with scores affected by cleanup activities. These input factor scores
    will change after either a surface or subsurface cleanup has occurred. These can also
    be used to assess the effects of future surface or subsurface cleanup. The input factors

-------
    in this group are Potential Contact Hours, Amount of MEC, Minimum MEC Depth
    Relative to the Maximum Receptor Intrusive Depth, and Migration Potential.
•   Input Factors with scores affected by change in land use activities.  These input
    factor scores are the ones that will change if land use activities change. These factors
    are Location of Additional Human Receptors, Site Accessibility, Potential Contact
    Hours, and Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Receptor Intrusive
    Depth.

In the judgment of the TWO, the factors affected by cleanup merited a higher weight than
those affected by land use activities.  The weights for the input factors are shown in Table
1.
                    Table 1: Input Factor Maximum Scores and Weights
Explosive Hazard
Component
Severity
Input Factor
Energetic Material Type
Location of Additional Human Receptors
Category total
Accessibility
Site Accessibility
Potential Contact Hours
Amount of MEC
Minimum MEC Depth/ Maximum Intrusive Depth
Migration Potential
Category total
Sensitivity
MEC Category
MEC Size
Category total
Total Score
Maximum
Scores
100
30
130
80
120
180
240
30
650
180
40
220
1000
Weights
10%
3%
13%
8%
12%
18%
24%
3%
65%
18%
4%
22%
100%
Considerations in Scoring Input Factor Categories
The numeric scoring approach allows flexibility in  describing the relative hazard of
different input  factor categories.   This approach reflects the judgments of the  TWO
regarding the relative hazard between different categories within an input factor.

For example, in the MEC Classification input factor there is only a five point difference
between the UXO and the  Fuzed Sensitive DMM categories.  This reflected the  TWG
judgment that munitions that fell into the Fuzed Sensitive DMM category were nearly as
dangerous as UXO.

By contrast for the Amount of MEC input factor there is a 150 point difference between
the score for an untreated Target Area and that for an associated untreated Safety Buffer.
This reflects the judgment that a Target Area will contain a much larger number of UXO
than its associated Safety Buffer.

-------
Another  aspect that was considered in the assignment of scores to  the  input factor
categories is that the scores for the categories were selected solely with respect to the
other categories within the input factor.  Because each input factor had its own weight, a
score of  30 for the Safety Buffer of the MEC Amount input factor (total weight of 18%)
is not comparable to the score of 30 for the Possible category of the Migration Potential
input factor (total weight of 3%).

Table 2 summarizes the scores for the MEC HA Input Factors.
                Table 2 Summary of Scoring for MEC HA Input Factors
Input Factor
Energetic Material
Type
Location of Additional
Human Receptors
Site Accessibility
Potential Contact
Hours
Amount of MEC
Category
High Explosives and Low
Explosive Fillers in Fragmenting
Rounds
White Phosphorous
Pyrotechnic
Propellant
Spotting Charge
Incendiary
Inside the MRS or inside the
ESQD arc
Outside of the ESQD arc
Full Accessibility
Moderate Accessibility
Limited Accessibility
Very Limited Accessibility
Many Hours
Some Hours
Few Hours
Very Few Hours
Target area
OB/OD area
Function Test Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver areas
Firing points
Safety buffer areas (Range
safety fans and OB/OD kick-out
areas)
Storage
Explosive-related industrial
facility
Score
Baseline
Conditions
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
120
70
40
15
180
180
165
140
115
75
30
25
20
Surface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
90
50
20
10
120
110
90
140
15
10
10
10
10
Subsurface
Cleanup
100
70
60
50
40
30
30
0
80
55
15
5
30
20
10
5
30
30
25
10
5
5
5
5
5

-------
                Table 2 Summary of Scoring for MEC HA Input Factors
Input Factor
Minimum MEC Depth
Relative to the
Maximum Intrusive
Depth
Migration Potential
MEC Category
MEC Size

Category
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located surface and subsurface;
After Cleanup: Intrusive depth
does not overlap with subsurface
MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth
overlaps with subsurface MEC
Baseline Condition: MEC
located only subsurface;
Baseline Condition or After
Cleanup: Intrusive depth does
not overlap with subsurface
MEC
Possible
Unlikely
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk Explosives
Small
Large

Minimum Possible Score
Maximum Possible Score
Score
Baseline
Conditions
240
240
150
50
30
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0

365
1000
Surface
Cleanup
150
50
N/A*
N/A*
30
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0

160
870
Subsurface
Cleanup
95
25
95
25
10
10
180
110
105
55
45
45
40
0

125
595
*N/A - Not Applicable: Surface cleanups for MEC would not be appropriate for site conditions where
MEC is all in the subsurface.
Considerations in the Determination of Hazard Levels Score Ranges
The MEC HA technical framework assesses a set of site conditions that include the types
of munitions and how they were used with the current or proposed  activities  at the site.
These are described in terms of the intrusiveness of the activities and the opportunities for
human receptors to come into contact with an MEC item. The Hazard Levels  reflect this
interaction between the past munitions-related use of the site and the current, determined
or reasonably anticipated future use activities at the site. The Hazard Levels score ranges
are shown in Table 3.

-------
                       Table 3 Hazard Level Score Ranges
Hazard Level
1
2
3
4
Maximum
MECHA
Score
1000
835
720
525
Minimum
MECHA
Score
840
725
530
125
Procedures Used to Determine Weights, Scores, and Hazard Level Category Ranges
The approaches used to determine the input factor weights, input factor category scores,
and the  score  ranges  for  the  Hazard Levels  were undertaken  in  tandem  with the
development of the input factors and the input factor categories. Many of the  iterations
were in response to changes in the input factors rather than solely to refine the scoring.
These  changes came as a  result of deliberations within the TWG,  feedback  from
organizations represented by the TWG members, as  well  as from feedback from pilot
tests of the framework at MEC sites, and from  briefings and outreach efforts  by TWG
members.

The  initial calibration effort and sensitivity runs on  the technical framework  were
undertaken from August, 2004 through February, 2005. These served as the  basis for
most of the weighting, scoring, and hazard level category range decisions at that time in
the development  of the MEC HA framework.  These  runs were  made for a specific,
identical set of scenarios, which represented combinations  of MEC Amount, munitions
characteristics (i.e., energetic material, fuzing, and size), and land use  activity scenarios.
These sensitivity runs were  completed for multiple iterations of weighting and scoring
scenarios. They also  addressed multiple iterations of input  factors and input  factor
categories.

The second iteration of weights/scores/hazard level ranges was  undertaken from August
2005 through November 2005. The second iteration evaluated recommended changes to
scores  and weights, and the  impacts  to Hazard Level  score ranges.  The  approach
followed the  same general  approach as the first iteration. As  a result of this analysis
several changes were made to the MEC HA framework.

Both of the sensitivity runs were performed  on a theoretical possible combination of 480
sites based on the input factors. The actual potential number  of  combinations is over
180,000 "possible" site conditions. It is of note that as  of  the FY 2006 DoD Report to
Congress, there are approximately 3,400 MEC sites within the Inventory of MMRP sites.
These include both land-based and underwater sites.  The  MEC HA  is  only concerned
with land-based sites. The  combination of  "reasonable" sites  (i.e., those that  could be
encountered in the real world) far exceeds the actual number of MEC sites in the MMRP
inventory. Therefore, the emphasis of "goodness of fit" for the sensitivity runs on the
technical framework was focused, both initially and in the second evaluation, on the
MEC site types that are known to exist, as well as some possible variations. In the view

-------
of the TWO, the 480 combinations evaluated more than adequately reflect the real world
conditions of MEC land-based sites.
Sensitivity Runs - August 2004 through February 2005.
The following tables summarize the different combinations of input factor categories that
were used for the sensitivity runs from August 2004 through February 2005. Table 4
shows the  combinations  of  input  factor categories for  Amount  of MEC,  MEC
Classification, MEC Size, Energetic  Material Type,  and Migration Potential.  The two
use activity scenarios presented in Table 5 then were  applied to each of the combinations
from Table 4. Finally, the combinations of cleanup status and depths presented in Table
6 were applied to each of those resulting combinations. These combinations result in 480
permutations.

     Table 4 Combinations of Amount of MEC, MEC Classification, MEC Size,
 Energetic Material Type,  and Migration Potential Used for Initial Sensitivity Runs
Amount of MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver Area
Storage Area
MEC Classification
UXO, Special Case**
UXO
DMM with Category 1
Fuzed**
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Energetic Material
Type
HE,
Spotting Charge*
HE,
Spotting Charge*
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
 At the next-to-last iteration, Propellant was substituted for Spotting Charge, because at that time Propellant
was given a lower score than Spotting Charge. This is an example of the iterative processes that were
ongoing during the framework development.
** The MEC Classification category of "UXO, Special Case" was changed to "Sensitive UXO", and the
category "DMM with Category 1 Fuze" was changed to "Fuzed Sensitive DMM," after the completion of
the sensitivity runs.
 Table 5:  Combinations of Site Accessibility, Potential Contact Hours, and Location
          of Additional Human Receptors used for Initial Sensitivity Runs
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very Limited
Potential Contact
Hours
Many
Very Few
Distance of Additional Potential Human Receptors to
Explosive Hazard*
Within MRS or within the ESQD of the boundary of the MRS
Outside the ESQD
*The input factor title and categories for the Distance of Additional Potential Human Receptors to
Explosive Hazard have changed slightly since the completion of the sensitivity runs.

-------
 Table 6: Combinations of Clean-up Status and Minimum MEC Depth Relative to
               Maximum Intrusive Depth for Initial Sensitivity Runs
Scoring Table Column
Baseline Condition*
Surface Cleanup
Subsurface Cleanup
Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth"
MEC located on the surface
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
*Based on 2006 comments, the first column of the scoring table was re-titled as "Baseline Conditions".
"The categories for the Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth have changed since
the completion of the sensitivity runs.

Results from iterations of the sensitivity runs were discussed by the TWG in November
and  December  2004,  and  again  in  January  2005.  Based on those  discussions,
determinations were made as to  the  suitability  of the results.  For  example,  in  the
judgment of the TWG, any Target  Area or Function Test Range with UXO on the surface
(i.e., sites of these types  that were  not yet cleaned up) should be in Hazard Levels  1 or 2.
However, most untreated Safety Buffer sites could end up in Hazard Level 3, with only
the most hazardous UXO and the  most intensive uses going to Hazard Levels 1 or 2 for
untreated Safely Buffer areas.

The  input factor  category scores,  the Hazard Level score  ranges, and the  input factor
weights were adjusted until the results of the sensitivity runs were  consistent. Results of
the final iteration  for the initial calibration effort were incorporated into the working draft
MEC HA Framework document that was used during the  pilot tests performed  during
May 2005 - August 2005 with the  Camp Butner and Camp Beale project teams.
Sensitivity Runs  - August 2005 through November 2005
Revisions were made to  some of the input factors and the scoring during TWG meetings
that occurred in September and October of 2005.  The revisions were made in response to
feedback from the pilot tests, as well as comments received during the presentation of the
MEC HA to  the Munitions Response Committee and other outreach efforts. These and
other    efforts    by    the   MEC     HA    TWG   can   be    viewed   at
http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/documents/hazard_assess_wrkgrp.htm

The primary revisions were:

•  The categories for the Energetic Material Type input factor were expanded. [Note:
   based on comments in 2006 external reviews, "Filler Type" title was changed to
   "Energetic Material Type"]

•  The categories for the Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive
   Depth input factor categories were revised.

•  The scoring for the Minimum MEC Depth Relative to the Maximum Intrusive Depth
   input factor was revised to provide a greater relative reduction for the reduction in
   hazard attained by a surface clearance.

-------
A final set of sensitivity runs were undertaken to assist in adjusting the Hazard Levels in
response to the scoring and category revisions.  These runs were similar to the sensitivity
runs described in Table  7, Table 8, and Table 9 document the combinations used for these
sensitivity runs.
     Table 7 Combinations of Amount of MEC, MEC Classification, MEC Size,
  Energetic Material Type, and Migration Potential used for Final Sensitivity Runs
Amount of MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver Area
Storage Area
MEC Classification
UXO Special Case*
UXO
DMM with Category 1
Fuze*
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Energetic Material
Type
HE,
Incendiary
HE,
Incendiary
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
*The MEC Classification category of "UXO, Special Case" was changed to "Sensitive UXO", and the
category "DMM with Category 1 Fuze" was changed to "Fuzed Sensitive DMM," after the completion of
the sensitivity runs.


 Table 8: Combinations of Site Accessibility, Potential Contact Hours, and Distance
of Additional Human Receptors to Explosive Hazard used for Final Sensitivity Runs
Site
Accessibility
Full
Veiy
Limited
Potential Contact
Hours
Many
Very Few
Distance of Additional Potential Human Receptors to
Explosive Hazard*
Within MRS or within the ESQD of the boundary of the MRS
Outside the ESQD
*The input factor title and categories for the Distance of Additional Potential Human Receptors to
Explosive Hazard have changed slightly since the completion of the sensitivity runs. See Table 2 for the
revised categories.
 Table 9:  Combinations of Clean-up Status and Minimum MEC Depth Relative to
                Maximum Intrusive Depth for Final Sensitivity Runs
Scoring Table Column
Baseline Condition
Surface Cleanup
Subsurface Cleanup
Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth*
MEC located surface and subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
MEC located surface and subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located surface and subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth overlaps
MEC located subsurface, intrusive depth does not overlap
 The category descriptions for the Minimum MEC Depth Relative to Maximum Intrusive Depth were
revised for clarity after the completion of the sensitivity runs.  See Table 2 for the revised categories.

These sensitivity runs were done in MS Excel.  Attachment  1 to this Appendix contains
the 1746 outputs from the sensitivity runs. The following sections describe the Hazard
Levels that resulted from these final runs.

-------
Hazard Level Characteristics
This section characterizes the Hazard Levels by providing the most common
combinations of the major input factor categories that score within each Hazard Level.
The major input factors are those that contribute the most to the munitions hazard or to
the accessibility of the hazard:

       •  Energetic Material Type
       •  MEC Classification
       •  MEC Minimum Depth Relative to Receptor Intrusive Depth
       •  Site Accessibility
       •  Potential Contact Hours

These combinations are presented in tables organized by the MEC Amount input factor
categories.  In each Hazard Level, there are separate tables for each of the cleanup
conditions (Baseline Conditions, Surface Cleanup, and Subsurface Cleanup) which score
in the level.

The tables were created by selecting the MEC Amount categories that made up the
majority of the MRSs in the Hazard Level. The predominant Energetic Material Type,
and MEC Classification, MEC Minimum Depth Relative to Receptor Intrusive Depth,
Site Accessibility and Potential Contact Hour categories were then determined for each
selected MEC Amount category. This means that the tables describe between 75% and
90% of the MRSs that score in each Hazard Level/cleanup condition; they do not
encompass all the possible combinations.

To make the MEC HA generally applicable to all the types of MRSs, some combinations
of input factor categories are not reasonable.  For example, Burial Sites (by definition)
will not have MEC located on the surface, and it is expected that, for example, Firing
Points or Storage Areas will only have DMM (not UXO). The combinations of input
factor categories used for developing the Hazard Level characterizations are presented in
Table 10.  Also for the Hazard Level characterization, the Site Accessibility categories of
"limited" and "very limited" were only combined with the "few" and "very few"
Potential Contact Hours categories.

Within these limitations, there are 71,424 possible "reasonable" combinations of input
factor categories. As noted earlier, this greatly exceeds the number of sites in the MMRP
Inventory. The following characterizations of the MEC HA Hazard Levels describe the
sites that the MEC HA can address, not the sites that it will be used to address.

-------
Table 10 "Reasonable" Combinations of Amount of MEC, MEC Classification,
MEC Size, Energetic Material Type, and Migration Potential for Characterizing
Hazard Levels
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Function Test
Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver
Area
Firing Point
Safety Buffer
Area
Storage
Explosives-
Related
Industrial
Facility
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
All categories
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk
Explosives
All categories
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Bulk
Explosives
Bulk
Explosives
MEC
Size
All
categories
All
categories
All
categories
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
All categories
All categories
Migration
Potential
All
categories
All
categories
All
categories
Minimum MEC
Depth Relative to
Maximum Intrusive
Depth
All categories
Subsurface only,
intrusive depth
overlaps
Subsurface only,
intrusive depth does
not overlap
All categories
Hazard Level 1 Characteristics
All of the MRSs in Hazard Level 1 are in the baseline condition, that is, the MRSs have
not had cleanup.  Table 11 summarizes the primary Hazard Level 1 characteristics
          Table 11:  Hazard Level 1 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Energetic
Material Type
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
MEC Depth
Surface and
subsurface
Site
Accessibility
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
Many or some

-------
Hazard Level 2 Characteristics
Hazard Level 2 contains sites in both the baseline and surface cleanup conditions. Table
12 summarizes the Hazard Level 2 baseline conditions characteristics.  Table 13
summarizes the Hazard Level 2 surface cleanup characteristics.  The MRSs with surface
cleanup in Hazard Level 2 are the most hazardous of the baseline Hazard Level 1 sites
where the receptor intrusive depth still overlaps with the minimum MEC depth.
          Table 12: Hazard Level 2 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
All categories
High
explosives,
White
phosphorous,
Pyrotechnics
High
explosives,
White
phosphorous
High
explosives,
White
phosphorous
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Sensitive UXO,
UXO,
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
MEC Depth
Surface and
subsurface,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Surface and
subsurface,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Surface and
subsurface
Surface and
subsurface
Surface and
subsurface
Site
Accessibility
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
All categories
All categories
Many or some
Many or some
Many
           Table 13: Hazard Level 2 Characteristics (Surface Cleanup)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Energetic
Material Type
High
explosives
High
explosives
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Site
Accessibility
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
Many
Many
Hazard Level 3 Characteristics
Hazard Level 3 MRSs are more diverse than Hazard Level 1 and Hazard Level 2 sites.
Hazard Level 3 also contains sites in baseline, and surface cleanup conditions. Table 14

-------
contains the Hazard Level 3 characteristics for the baseline conditions, and Table  15
contains them for surface cleanup conditions.  A small number of MRSs with subsurface
cleanup also scored in  Hazard Level 3, but they were  only sites where the receptor
intrusive depth overlaps with the minimum MEC depth.  This combination (a site with a
subsurface cleanup that was not below the receptor intrusive depth) is not likely to occur,
and so has not been included in the Hazard Level 3 characteristics.
Table 14: Hazard Level 3 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Function Test
Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver
Area
Energetic
Material Type
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
All categories
All categories
All categories
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Sensitive UXO,
UXO, Fuzed
Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM,
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed DMM,
Special Case,
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap or
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap or
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Surface and
subsurface
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap or
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Surface and
subsurface
Site
Accessibility
Limited or
Very limited
Full or
moderate
Limited or
Very limited
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Moderate,
Limited, or
Very Limited
Full or
Moderate
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
Few or Very
few
All categories
Few or Very
few
All categories
Some, Few, or
Very Few
All categories
Few or Very
Few
All categories
Many or some

-------
Table 14: Hazard Level 3 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
Firing Point
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Storage
Energetic
Material Type
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
MEC
Classification
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM
Sensitive UXO,
UXO, Fuzed
Sensitive DMM
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM,
Bulk Explosives
MEC Depth
Surface and
subsurface
Surface and
subsurface
Surface and
subsurface
Surface and
subsurface
Site
Accessibility
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
Many or some
Many or some
Many or some
Many or some
Table 15:  Hazard Level 3 Characteristics (Surface Cleanup)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Sensitive UXO,
UXO,
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Site
Accessibility
Full or
moderate
Potential
Contact
Hours
All categories

-------
Hazard Level 4 Characteristics
Hazard Level 4 contains MRSs  in baseline,  surface cleanup, and subsurface cleanup
conditions.   Table 16  contains  the  Hazard  Level  4 characteristics  for the  baseline
conditions, Table 17 for the surface cleanup conditions, and Table 18 for the subsurface
cleanup conditions.
Table 16: Hazard Level 4 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
OB/OD Area
Burial Pit
Maneuver
Area
Firing Point
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
All categories
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
All categories
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
All categories
MEC
Classification
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM,
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Surface and
subsurface
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Surface and
subsurface
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Site
Accessibility
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
Potential
Contact
Hours
Few or Very
Few
Few or Very
Few
Few or Very
Few
All categories
All categories
Few or Very
Few
All categories
All categories

-------
Table 16: Hazard Level 4 Characteristics (Baseline Conditions)
MRS Type
Safety Buffer
Storage
Industrial
Energetic
Material Type
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
All categories
High
Explosives,
White
Phosphorous
Pyrotechnics,
Propellant,
Spotting
Charge,
Incendiary
All categories
All categories
MEC
Classification
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Bulk Explosives
MEC Depth
Surface and
subsurface
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Surface and
subsurface
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
All categories
Site
Accessibility
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
All categories
Potential
Contact
Hours
Few or Very
Few
All categories
All categories
Few or Very
Few
All categories
All categories
All categories
Table 17: Hazard Level 4 Characteristics (Surface Cleanup)
MRS Type
Target Area
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Site
Accessibility
Limited or
Very Limited
All categories
Potential
Contact
Hours
Few or Very
Few
All categories

-------
Table 17: Hazard Level 4 Characteristics (Surface Cleanup)
MRS Type
OB/OD Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Firing Point
Safety Buffer
Area
Storage
Industrial
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
All categories
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO,
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed DMM,
Unfuzed DMM,
Bulk Explosives
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Sensitive UXO,
UXO,
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Bulk Explosives
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth overlaps,
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Site
Accessibility
Limited or
Very Limited
All categories
All categories
All categories
Potential
Contact
Hours
Few or Very
Few
All categories
All categories
All categories

-------
Table 18:  Hazard Level 4 Characteristics (Subsurface Cleanup)
MRS Type
Target Area
OB/OD Area
Function Test
Range
Burial Pit
Maneuver
Area
Firing Point
Safety Buffer
Area
Storage
Industrial
Energetic
Material Type
All categories
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
All categories
Sensitive UXO,
UXO
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
All categories
Fuzed Sensitive
DMM, Fuzed
DMM, Unfuzed
DMM, Bulk
Explosives
Bulk Explosives
MEC Depth
Subsurface
only, intrusive
depth does not
overlap
Site
Accessibility
All categories
Potential
Contact
Hours
All categories

-------
       Attachment 1 to
         Appendix D
Results of Final Sensitivity Runs

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
1000
985
980
970
965
960
955
950
945
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
940
935
930
930
930
925
915
915
915
910
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
910
910
910
900
900
895
895
895
895
890
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
890
890
885
885
880
880
880
875
875
875
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
870
870
870
865
865
865
860
860
860
860
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
860
855
855
855
850
850
845
845
845
845
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
840
840
840
840
840
840
840
835
830
830
Hazard
Level
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
830
825
825
825
825
825
825
820
820
820
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
820
820
820
820
820
815
810
810
810
810
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
810
810
805
805
805
805
805
800
800
800
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
800
800
800
800
800
795
795
795
795
790
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
785
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
785
785
785
780
780
780
780
780
780
780
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
780
780
775
775
775
775
775
770
770
770
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
770
770
770
770
770
770
770
770
770
765
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
765
765
765
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
760
760
760
755
755
755
755
755
755
750
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
750
750
750
750
750
745
745
740
740
740
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
735
735
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
735
735
735
735
735
730
730
730
730
730
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
730
730
730
730
730
730
730
730
730
730
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
730
725
725
725
725
720
720
720
720
720
Hazard
Level
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
720
720
715
715
715
715
715
710
710
710
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
710
710
710
710
710
710
710
710
710
710
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
710
710
710
710
705
705
705
705
705
705
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
695
695
695
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
695
695
695
690
690
690
690
690
690
690
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
690
690
690
690
690
690
690
690
690
690
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
690
690
690
685
685
685
685
685
685
680
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
680
675
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
675
675
675
675
670
670
670
670
670
670
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
670
670
670
670
670
670
670
670
670
670
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
670
670
665
665
665
665
665
665
665
665
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
660
660
655
655
655
655
650
650
650
650
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
650
650
650
650
650
650
650
650
650
650
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
650
650
650
650
650
650
650
645
645
645
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
645
645
645
645
640
640
640
640
640
640
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
640
640
640
640
640
640
635
635
635
635
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
635
635
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Score
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
630
630
625
625
625
625
625
625
620
620
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
620
620
620
620
615
615
615
615
615
615
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
615
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
610
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
610
610
605
605
605
605
605
605
600
600
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Score
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
600
600
595
595
595
595
595
595
595
595
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
595
595
595
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
590
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
585
585
585
585
585
580
580
580
580
580
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
575
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
575
575
575
575
575
575
575
575
570
570
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
570
570
570
570
565
565
565
565
565
565
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
565
565
565
565
560
560
560
560
560
560
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
555
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
550
550
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Score
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
550
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
550
550
550
550
550
545
545
545
545
545
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
545
545
545
545
545
540
540
540
540
540
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
535
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
535
535
535
535
535
535
535
530
530
530
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
530
Hazard
Level
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
530
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
Hazard
Level
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
520
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
510
510
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
510
505
505
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
505
505
505
505
505
505
505
505
505
500
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
500
500
500
500
495
495
495
495
495
495
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
495
495
495
495
495
495
495
495
495
495
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
495
495
495
495
495
490
490
490
490
490
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
490
490
490
485
485
485
485
485
485
485
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
485
485
485
485
485
485
485
485
480
480
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
480
475
475
475
475
475
475
475
475
475
475
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
475
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
470
470
470
470
470
470
465
465
465
465
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
465
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
465
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
460
460
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
450
450
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
450
450
450
450
450
450
445
445
445
445
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
445
445
445
445
445
445
440
440
440
440
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
440
435
435
435
435
435
435
435
435
435
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
435
435
435
435
430
430
430
430
430
430
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
425
425
425
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
420
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
420
420
420
420
420
415
415
415
415
415
415
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Score
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
410
410
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
410
410
410
410
405
405
405
405
405
405
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Score
405
405
405
405
405
400
400
400
400
400
400
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
400
400
400
400
400
400
395
395
395
395
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Score
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
395
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
390
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
390
390
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
380
380
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Score
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
375
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Score
375
375
375
375
375
375
370
370
370
370
370
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
365
365
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
365
365
365
365
365
360
360
360
360
360
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Score
360
360
360
360
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
355
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
355
355
355
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
350
345
345
345
345
345
345
345
345
340
340
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
340
340
340
340
340
340
335
335
335
335
335
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
335
335
335
335
335
335
335
335
330
330
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
330
330
330
330
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
325
320
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Score
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
320
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
315
315
315
315
315
315
310
310
310
310
310
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Score
310
310
310
310
310
305
305
305
305
305
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
295
295
295
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Score
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
295
295
295
295
295
295
290
290
290
290
290
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
290
290
290
290
290
285
285
285
285
285
285
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
285
280
280
280
280
280
280
280
280
280
275
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Score
275
275
270
270
265
265
265
265
265
265
265
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Sensitive UXO
Sensitive UXO
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
265
265
265
265
265
260
260
260
260
260
260
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
260
260
255
255
255
255
255
255
255
255
255
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Baseline
Conditions
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
MEC
Classification
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Score
255
255
255
255
255
250
250
250
245
245
245
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Score
245
240
240
235
235
235
235
235
235
230
230
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Full
Full
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Many Hours
Many Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Small
Large
Score
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
225
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Target Area
Target Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Function Test
Range
Function Test
Range
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup:
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
UXO
UXO
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Large
Large
Score
220
220
215
215
215
215
215
210
210
205
195
195
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
HE and Low
Explosive
Filler in
Fragmenting
Rounds
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Safety Buffer
Safety Buffer
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Possible
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
UXO
UXO
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Fuzed
Sensitive
DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Large
Large
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Small
Score
195
195
195
195
195
190
190
185
185
185
165
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------
Scoring
Column
Subsurface
Cleanup
Surface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Subsurface
Cleanup
Filler Type
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Incendiary
Distance to
Hazard
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Inside MRS or
inside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Outside ESQD
Arc
Site
Accessibility
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Very
Limited
Potential
Contact Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Very Few
Hours
Amount of
MEC
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
Maneuver
Area
MEC Depth
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Surface
and Subsurface;
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Baseline: Subsurface
Only; Baseline or
After Cleanup: No
Overlap
Migration
Potential
Unlikely
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
Possible
Unlikely
MEC
Classification
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
Unfuzed DMM
MEC
Size
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Score
165
165
155
155
125
125
Hazard
Level
4
4
4
4
4
4

-------