United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
              Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-96/072
June 1996
EPA      Project Summary
              Proceedings:  The 1995
              Symposium on Greenhouse  Gas
              Emissions and  Mitigation
              Research
              Sue Philpott, Compiler
               The report documents the 1995 Sym-
              posium on Greenhouse Gas Emissions
              and Mitigation Research, sponsored by
              the U.S.  Environmental Protection
              Agency's  Air Pollution Prevention and
              Control Division (EPA/APPCD), in
              Washington, DC, on June 27-29, 1995.
              The symposium provided a forum of
              exchange of up-to-date information on
              emission  sources contributing to glo-
              bal climate change and state-of-the-art
              mitigation technologies and practices.
              Presentations related to: activities in
              EPA, U.S.  Department of Energy (DOE),
              and Electric Power Research Institute
              (EPRI) on greenhouse gas emissions
              and mitigation research, and APPCD's
              global emissions and technology data-
              bases; carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions,
              disposal,  and control; methane (CH4)
              emissions and mitigation technologies
              including  such topics as coal  mines,
              the natural gas industry, key agricul-
              tural sources, and landfills; renewable
              energy options  including alternative
              biomass fuels; and advanced energy
              systems.  The proceedings include 44
              papers, visuals, and abstracts.
               This Project Summary was developed
              by the National Risk  Management Re-
              search Laboratory's Air Pollution Pre-
              vention and Control Division, Research
              Triangle Park,  NC, to announce key
              findings of the research project that is
              fully documented in a separate report
              of the same title (see Project  Report
              ordering information at back).

              Introduction
               The 1995 Symposium on Greenhouse
              Gas Emissions and Mitigation  Research,
 sponsored by EPA/APPCD and Acurex
 Environmental Corporation was held June
 27 through 29, 1995, in Washington, DC.
 Forty-four presentations were made on
 recent research on global  change emis-
 sions and potential mitigation technolo-
 gies. The  symposium  Chairperson  was
 Michael A. Maxwell of EPA/APPCD.  This
 project summary includes abstracts of the
 symposium  presentations.  The five  ses-
 sions were:
  I.  Overview of National and  Interna-
     tional Efforts
  II.  Emissions from  Anthropogenic
     Sources
  III. Mitigation  of Methane  and Other
     Greenhouse Gases
  IV. Biomass Utilization
  V.  Renewables and Advanced Energy
     Efficient, End-Use Technologies

 Session I

 Overview of National  and
 International Efforts
 (Frank T.  Princiotta, EPA,
 Session Chairperson)

 "Greenhouse Warming: The
 Uncertainties and the Mitigation
 Challenges,"
 Frank T. Princiotta Director,
 APPCD, EPA
  Analysis will be presented dealing with
 some of the most significant issues asso-
 ciated with potential greenhouse  gas
 warming. Using a  projection  model, the
 uncertainties regarding projected warming

-------
will be quantified. Given these uncertain-
ties, ranges of likely warming  will be pre-
sented  and potential impacts discussed.
An analysis will also be included identify-
ing countries most responsible for green-
house gas emissions  and their contribu-
tion to carbon dioxide and methane emis-
sions. Also, an analysis will be presented
indicating the relevance of the key green-
house gases to  global warming. Various
mitigation strategies will be discussed and
their impacts on global warming identified.
Biomass will be highlighted as a key alter-
native to fossil fuels.

"Climate Change Activities in
EPA's Office of Policy,
Planning, & Evaluation
(OPPE),"
Kurt Johnson, EPA
  OPPE coordinates EPA climate  policy
and supports the development of U.S. po-
sitions on  climate change.  OPPE's ana-
lytical activities include: assessing the po-
tential costs and benefits of policy options
to  reduce the risks of global warming, and
recommending ways to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions in the  most cost-effective
way possible;  reviewing the effectiveness
of  the U.S. Climate Change Action Plan
and other countries' climate change plans;
proposing  actions that could ensure that
the U.S.  will  meet the Administration's
commitment  to  reduce greenhouse gas
emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000;
preparing studies on the potential impacts
of  climate change; and working as part  of
an interagency process to  develop U.S.
policy under the  Framework  Convention
on Climate Change.

"Pollution Prevention at a
Profit,"
Amy C. Olson, EPA
  The EPA's  Atmospheric Pollution Pre-
vention Division (APPD) aims to profitably
prevent pollution through new and innova-
tive voluntary public/private  partnership
programs that overcome market  barriers
to  advance energy efficiency.  Promoting
energy-efficient  technologies and  tech-
niques to prevent pollution,  EPA's Green
Lights, Energy STAR Buildings and Equip-
ment, and methane reduction and recov-
ery programs  have achieved measurable
economic and environmental  successes.
Working within the framework of Presi-
dent Clinton's Climate Change Action Plan
which strives to  respond to the threat  of
global climate change while  strengthening
the economy, APPD  provides solutions
that create jobs, encourage economic in-
vestment, and establish new product mar-
kets.
"Energy Partnerships for a
Strong Economy: A Better
Climate for Jobs,"
Arlene F. Anderson, DOE
  The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)
Office of Energy Efficiency and  Renew-
able Energy has responsibility for imple-
menting many of the actions contained in
the President's  Climate  Change  Action
Plan. These programs (Energy Partner-
ships For A Strong Economy) are in part
programs that are also being implemented
by DOE in response to the Energy Policy
Act of 1992. With Fiscal Year 1995 fund-
ing in hand, DOE and its many partners
are saving money and environmental emis-
sions that would  not have been saved
had it not been for the increased  empha-
sis  placed  on these  programs. A sample
of DOE's program accomplishments  fol-
lows.

"Climate Change and the Value
of Technological Innovation
Under Uncertainty,"
Stephen C. Peck and Thomas J.
Teisberg, EPRI
  In this paper, we use a small-scale  "in-
tegrated assessment" model  to  explore
the role of technological  innovation  in  the
context of  uncertainty about the costs of
climate  change  and the state of future
carbon-free energy technologies. We find
that if future technology  is better, optimal
emissions  in the future are  significantly
lower, while optimal emissions in the near
term may be slightly higher. We also find
that a 10% increase in the probability of
even modestly improved technology may
be  worth $130  billion in present value.
These  results indicate that the state of
future technology matters in developing a
strategy for  addressing  climate change,
and that there are potentially large pay-
offs to  actions we might take  to promote
improvements in future  technology. De-
veloping carbon-free energy technologies
is a key step toward a sustainable devel-
opment future.

"The Global Future:
Environment vs. Development,"
John  Kadyszewski,  Winrock
International
  Some members of the international com-
munity have been surprised at the strongly
negative reaction from many countries in
the developing world to proposals for glo-
bal cooperation to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. These  representatives of  de-
veloping countries see any agreements to
reduce  future greenhouse gas emissions
as placing unnecessary constraints on their
opportunities for development. They view
energy as critical  to economic  develop-
ment. Per capita energy consumption  in
the U.S.  and Europe dwarfs per capita
energy consumption  in  the  developing
world. Global environmental objectives are
construed as in  conflict with  national de-
velopment objectives.
  This paper reviews projected  green-
house gas emissions  associated with
power generation in China, India, and Cen-
tral America.  Current  projections show
emissions from China and India overtak-
ing emissions from the U.S.,  Europe, and
Japan early in the  next century. Unilateral
reductions by the U.S., Europe, or Japan
cannot prevent dramatic  increases in fu-
ture emissions. Data from Central America
are used to demonstrate viable commer-
cial alternatives  to the expanded  use  of
fossil fuels and their associated emissions.
  How can the world meet environmental
and development  objectives? The paper
argues that thoughtful management of pub-
lic global  capital pools can create a sys-
tem under which objectives can be met.
Changes  in  how  multilateral  investment
institutions use their capital can have dra-
matic impact on future  investment deci-
sions  made by private companies. In this
modified investment climate, private com-
panies would have  incentives  to build
cleaner systems today and to develop a
new  generation  of technology for tomor-
row. Without change, demands for devel-
opment will place  additional  pressure on
the environment and  increase the likeli-
hood of global tension.

Session II

Emissions From Anthropogenic
Sources
(M.A.K. Khalil,  Oregon  Graduate
Institute, Session Chairperson)

"Global Emissions
Inventories,"
Jane Dignon, Lawrence
Livermore Laboratory
  Many trace chemical species in the at-
mosphere  are  radiatively important  and
may  affect  climate and  air  quality.  De-
tailed  and accurate emissions inventories
are essential for  understanding the chang-
ing chemical  composition of our atmo-
sphere, and to establish compliance with
international treaties. Currently climate and
chemistry model predictions are limited by
the paucity of quality emissions data in-
put. This paper  presents the most up-to-
date  compilation of emissions inventories
for radiatively important trace species. It
reports the  spatial and temporal  charac-

-------
teristics of the emissions along with some
interpretive comments. Except for most of
North America and Western  Europe, de-
tailed regional  inventories are scarce for
almost all radiatively  important trace spe-
cies.

"CO2 Emission Calculations
and Trends,"
Tom Boden and Gregg Marland,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Bob Andres, Institute of
Northern Engineering,
University of Alaska-Fairbanks
  Evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels
have  risen  during the past  several de-
cades is irrefutable. Most of the observed
increase in  atmospheric CO2 is believed
to  result  from CO2 releases from fossil
fuel  burning.  The United  Nations  (UN)
Framework Convention on Climate Change
(FCCC)  held  in Rio  de Janeiro  in  June
1992 reflects global concern over increas-
ing  CO2 mixing  ratios and their potential
impact on climate. One of the  convention's
stated objectives is  the "stabilization of
greenhouse gas concentrations in the at-
mosphere at a  level that would  prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with
the climate system." Specifically, the FCCC
asks all 154 signing countries to inventory
their current greenhouse gas emissions,
and it sets  non-binding targets for some
countries to control emissions by stabiliz-
ing them at  1990 levels by the year 2000.
  This paper describes the  compilation,
processing,  and availability  of  the  most
comprehensive CO2  emissions  database
presently available.  The paper also dis-
cusses caveats in the database, efforts to
improve  it, and CO2 emission trends. The
database offers global, regional,  and na-
tional annual estimates of CO2 emissions
resulting from fossil fuel burning, cement
manufacturing, and gas flaring in oil fields
for 1950-1992. Estimates are  derived from
energy data published by the UN and the
U.S. Department of Energy,  and cement
production data published by  the U.S. Bu-
reau of Mines. This  CO2 emission data-
base is essential to carbon cycle research,
provides estimates of the rate at which
fossil  fuel  combustion  and cement  pro-
duction have  released  CO2 to the atmo-
sphere, and offers baseline estimates for
those countries compiling FCCC 1990 CO2
emission inventories.
  According to these estimates, global CO2
emissions from fossil fuel consumption,
cement production, and gas  flaring  have
grown almost 4-fold since 1950.  The 1992
estimate of 6097 million metric  tons of
carbon ended a string  of eight consecu-
tive years of growth  in global CO2 emis-
sions and represents a  1.2% decline from
1991.  The 1991 estimate of 6172 million
metric tons  of carbon is the highest CO2
emission estimate since the data record
began in  1950,  but includes 130 million
metric tons  of CO2 being emitted to the
atmosphere from the Kuwaiti oil field fires.
  Regionally,  a marked decline  in CO2
emissions continues for Eastern Europe,
and Western Europe experienced its first
decline in emissions since 1987-88. How-
ever, regions where populations continue
to grow—such as Africa, Centrally Planned
Asia, Central and South America, the Far
East, and Oceania—show corresponding
increases in CO2 emissions. In 1950, North
America,  Eastern  Europe,  and Western
Europe (including Germany) accounted for
89.1% of global CO2 emissions from fossil
fuel burning, cement  production, and gas
flaring, whereas the remaining six regions
accounted for only 10.9% Now these  six
regions contribute 41.1% of the CO2 emit-
ted globally
  Nationally, the U.S. continues to be the
largest single source of fossil-fuel-related
CO2 emissions with 1332  metric tons of
carbon emitted  in 1992. The  top three
emitting countries—the U.S., China,  and
Russia—were responsible for  43.2% of
the world's emissions from fossil fuel burn-
ing in 1992. The top 20 emitting countries
accounted for -80% of all the world's emis-
sions.

"Rice Agriculture: An Important
Source of Atmospheric
Methane,"
M.A.K. Khalil, M.J. Shearer and
R.A. Rasmussen, Oregon
Graduate Institute
  In all the global budgets of atmospheric
methane,  emissions from rice agriculture
have  been among  the largest single
sources. Early estimates were as high as
300 Tg/yr, but upon  careful examination
of the data, the estimates were reduced
to about 100 Tg/yr. In time, as direct flux
measurements became  available, it was
found  that there was considerable vari-
ability in the whole season of emissions of
methane from different types of rice fields.
The global estimates now are even lower,
about 60 Tg/yr. Even so, rice fields consti-
tute a major source of methane. The emis-
sions  of methane from rice  fields may
have been higher at some earlier time in
recent decades than they are now.  Be-
cause of limitation of land readily adapt-
able to rice agriculture, the use of inor-
ganic  fertilizers, and  the  short growing
cycles  of recent hybrid varieties, future
emissions may not increase greatly.

"Developing Improved Methane
Emission Estimates for Coal
Mining Operations,"
Stephen D. Piccot, Sushma S.
Masemore, Eric S. Ringler,
Southern Research Institute
David A. Kirchgessner, EPA
  The  EPA's APPCD has  sponsored  re-
search to improve emissions data and es-
tablish  more representative emissions in-
ventories for coal mining operations. The
focus of this effort has been on the uncer-
tain sources  of emissions including sur-
face mines,  post-mining coal  handling,
abandoned underground mines, and inac-
tive surface and underground mines. Mea-
surement data collected  at  5  surface
mines,  20 abandoned underground mines,
and 1  coal handling facility  are presented.
The significance of  these  individual
sources, and their emissions processes,
is also examined. Measurement priorities
are also discussed.

"Methods for Estimating
Methane Emissions from the
Domestic Natural Gas
Industry,"
David A. Kirchgessner, EPA
R. Michael Cowgill, Matthew R.
Harrison, Lisa M. Campbell,
Radian Corporation
  Anthropogenic emissions of  methane
are suspected of making a significant con-
tribution to the phenomena associated with
global  climate change. Early, gross esti-
mates  based on scarce data suggested
that the global natural gas and coal indus-
tries each  may contribute  10 to 15% of
the annual anthropogenic methane inven-
tory. This possibility made the importance
of improving the industry-specific emis-
sions estimates apparent. The data would
be useful in determining where emissions
could  be most  economically  reduced if
that approach  were deemed prudent; the
data would also be useful in evaluating
the advisability of switching from coal to
natural gas fuel as a  near-term  measure
for  reducing  methane emissions  to the
atmosphere. The project described  has
the goal of estimating  methane emissions
from the domestic gas industry  to within
+0.5%  of production or+100 Billion Cubic
Feet. Emission  estimates are nearly com-
plete and  appear to  be converging  on

-------
1.75% of production with a  1992 base
year.

"GloED and GloTech: Global
Emissions and Technology
Database Software,"
Lee L. Beck, EPA
  This paper describes two powerful soft-
ware packages being developed by EPA.
One  is an emissions inventory software
called GloED, and the other is a technol-
ogy software called GloTech. GloED com-
piles  country and source specific invento-
ries of emissions of greenhouse gases by
combining  emission factors and activity
data. GloTech computes cost and envi-
ronmental  impacts of technologies and
technology combinations.  Both software
packages are very user-friendly, integrate
the data with  their references, and rely
heavily on graphics to assist the user.

"Overview of ERA'S Global
Climate Change Research
Program on Waste
Management,"
Susan A. Thorneloe, EPA
Randy Strait and Michiel Doom,
E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.
Bart Eklund, Radian Corporation
  This paper provides an overview of on-
going research  at EPA's  APPCD, the
former Air and Energy Engineering Re-
search  Laboratory, on  greenhouse gas
emissions from  waste management.
Sources being evaluated include landfills,
open  dumps,  waste piles, wastewater
(treated and  untreated), septic sewage,
and agricultural waste.  Earlier estimates
have suggested that waste management
accounts for -70 teragrams (1012 grams)
per year (Tg/yr) of methane (CH4) globally
or 19% of total global CH4 anthropogenic
emissions of 360 Tg/yr.  However, the es-
timate ranges from 54 to 95 Tg/yr and  is
considered very uncertain due to limita-
tions  in available data for establishing cred-
ible emission  factors and  limitations  in
country-specific activity data. Since land-
fills and possibly other waste sources are
amenable to cost-effective control,  these
sources  have  been given  a  priority for
developing more reliable estimates and
identifying cost-effective opportunities for
greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. Pri-
marily due to the ability to utilize the CH4
for its energy potential, this is a relatively
cost-effective source  of GHG  emissions
to control. Emission sources that are ame-
nable to  control—such as  landfills—have
been given a high priority for clarification.
The research described in  this paper  is
funded through EPA's Global Climate
Change Research Program. This research
is part of a larger EPA research program
to  develop more  reliable GHG  emission
estimates for the major sources and to
identify cost-effective opportunities for re-
ducing GHG emissions. This  research is
being conducted in support of the goals
established at the United Nations Confer-
ence on Environment and Development in
1992 and the Climate Change Action Plan.

"Greenhouse Gases from
Widely Used Small-Scale
Combustion Devices in
Developing Countries: Phases
I-II: Stoves in India and China;
Phase  III: Charcoal Kilns  in
Thailand," Kirk R. Smith and
Junfeng Zhang East-West
Center Susan A. Thorneloe,
EPA
  Small  combustion devices  such  as
stoves and charcoal  kilns  in  developing
countries are individually small, but so nu-
merous that, depending  on  their emission
factors, they could possibly influence glo-
bal inventories  of greenhouse-related
gases. A pilot study in Manila found that
such devices do seem  to  have high
enough emission factors to be of interest,
and thus a larger set of studies is being
undertaken in India, China, and Thailand
to  determine emission factors for a wide
range of the kinds of stove/fuel combina-
tions and charcoal kilns of common use in
developing countries.

Session III

Mitigation of Methane and
Other Greenhouse Gases
(Rhone Resch, EPA, Session
Chairperson)

"The EPA STAR Program and
the Natural Gas Industry,"
Kathleen Hogan,  EPA
  This paper describes the Natural Gas
STAR Program,  a cooperative, voluntary
program  between the  Natural  Gas Indus-
try and EPA to implement pollution  pre-
vention techniques in a cost-effective man-
ner. Specifically, the STAR Program en-
courages natural gas companies to adopt
cost-effective practices  and technologies
that reduce emissions  of  methane—the
primary component of natural gas. Meth-
ane is a potent greenhouse  gas—20 times
more effective than CO2 at trapping heat
in the atmosphere.
  In addition to reducing the threat of glo-
bal warming, companies that participate
in the Natural Gas STAR Program also
save money by reducing leaks and losses
of the product they sell. In 1993, the first
partial year of the program, transmission
and distribution partners saved 1.3 billion
cubic feet of natural gas worth almost $3
million. The 1994 program results are ex-
pected to generate even greater savings.

"Significant Sources of
Methane Emissions in the
Natural Gas Industry,"
Matthew R.  Harrison and R.
Michael Cowgill, Radian
Corporation
David A.  Kirchgessner, EPA
  Methane, the major constituent of natu-
ral gas,  is  a potent greenhouse  gas be-
lieved to  increase the effect of global warm-
ing when released to the atmosphere. Re-
ducing methane emissions would lessen
this effect,  as well as save money and
increase energy efficiency by decreasing
the amount of gas product lost. This project
quantified  methane emissions from the
natural gas industry.  Major sources and
quantities of methane  emissions are sum-
marized, emission estimation methods are
described, and potential candidates for re-
ducing methane emissions are discussed.

"Utilization and Control of
Landfill Methane by Fuel Cells,"
J.L. Preston and J.C. Tricciola,
International Fuel Cells
Corporation
R.J. Spiegel, EPA
  The EPA has conducted a  program to
control methane  emissions from landfills
using  a  fuel cell. The fuel cell would  re-
duce air  emissions affecting global warm-
ing, acid rain,  and other health and envi-
ronmental  issues.  By producing  usable
energy,  it would also reduce  our depen-
dency on foreign oil. This paper discusses
the  Phase  II and Phase III results of the
EPA program  underway  at  International
Fuel Cells  Corporation. In this  program,
two critical issues were addressed: (1) a
landfill gas cleanup  method  that would
remove  contaminants from the gas suffi-
ciently for fuel  cell operation,  and (2) suc-
cessful operation of a  commercial fuel cell
power plant on the lower-heating value
waste methane gas.

"Methane Recovery from
Landfills and an Overview of
EPA/APPCD's Landfill Gas
Research Program,"
John G. Pacey, Emcon
Associates

-------
Susan A. Thorneloe, EPA
Michiel Doom, E.H. Pechan &
Associates, Inc.
  Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations for new
and existing municipal solid waste (MSW)
landfills which were proposed in MAY 1991
are scheduled to be promulgated in Au-
gust 1995. These regulations are expected
to require up to 400 landfills to install and
maintain  a landfill gas  (LFG) extraction
and control facility to reduce landfill air
emissions. These  emissions  include
nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs)
which contribute to  tropospheric ozone,
methane which  is a  potent  greenhouse
gas, and toxic compounds which are of
concern to public health. In addition, land-
fills that are subject to  New Source Re-
view may also be considered for controls
to reduce landfill  air emissions. Control
options include flaring the gas or combus-
tion with energy recovery which include
(1) direct use of the gas as medium heat-
ing value fuel, (2) generation of electricity
using reciprocating engines, gas or steam
turbines,  or fuel cells, and  (3) upgrading
the gas to pipeline quality  or to produce
vehicular fuel. Many landfill owners will be
evaluating their options for controlling land-
fill air emissions and will be considering  if
it is practical and economical to minimize
potential  control costs though the devel-
opment of a LFG utilization project.
  This  paper summarizes  ongoing  re-
search  at EPA's APPCD (the former Air
and Energy Engineering  Research  Labo-
ratory)  on LFG utilization. Research was
conducted to identify the technical issues
and solutions through interviews conducted
with industry experts in the U.S., Europe,
and Australia. The U.S.  developers and
operators who were interviewed represent
over 70% of the  projects in the U.S.  Tech-
nical issues associated with the use  of
LFG as compared to natural gas—which
is the primary fuel cell-can  result due to
chlorinated and toxic compounds, particu-
late and reduced heating value when com-
pared to natural gas [18.6 vs. 37.2x106 J/
m3(500 vs. 1000 Btu/scf)]. A recent data-
base of LFG-to-energy  projects that has
been developed  through a  collaborative
program  between EPA/APPCD  and  the
Solid Waste Association of North America
(SWANA), indicates that there are cur-
rently 137 LFG-to-energy projects  in  the
U.S. and  9  in Canada.  This paper  will
summarize statistics and industry trends
resulting from this database, and discuss
the nontechnical and technical issues and
solutions. Other EPA/APPCD research that
will be discussed in this  paper is a recent
overview of emerging technologies for LFG
utilization and research regarding the dem-
onstration of fuel cells for LFG utilization.
  The research  described is funded
through EPA's  Global  Climate  Change
Research Program. This research is part
of a larger EPA research program to de-
velop  more  reliable emission estimates
for the major sources of greenhouse emis-
sions  and to identify cost-effective oppor-
tunities for reducing greenhouse gas emis-
sions. This research is being conducted in
support of the  goals established at the
United Nations  Conference on  Environ-
ment  and Development in  1992 and the
Climate Change Action Plan.

"Case Studies of Sewage
Treatment with Recovery of
Energy from Methane,"
William H. Hahn, Science
Applications International
Corporation
  Energy recovery from biogas generated
from wastewater treatment  processes is
universally cost- effective and has gained
widespread acceptance. The technology
exists to allow full  use of biogas, and the
extra  costs of incorporating  this energy
source into a system are small.  The pay-
back period for installation  of biogas en-
ergy recovery at plants  having anaerobic
digesters is  short,  typically less than 6
years.  Recovery and use  of biogas ac-
complish  energy conservation and pollu-
tion prevention goals, and also  cost sav-
ings,  making this  an obvious choice for
application in all treatment plans that em-
ploy anaerobic digestion for stabilizing
wastewater biosolids.
  Other energy conservation and munici-
pal  pollution  prevention activities can be
integrated with use of biogas, as demon-
strated by the Sunnyvale plant,  including
collection and use of landfill gas,  recovery
of waste heat, water reclamation, and mu-
nicipal water conservation.  Often, waste-
water  treatment plants  are  located near
municipal landfills,  and could potentially
develop the  landfill gas as an additional
energy source. Advantages lie not only in
the  cost  savings  from  energy   recovery
from the  landfill gas, but also in meeting
regulatory and  safety concerns  posed by
landfill gas emissions.
  The examples of the Orange County
and Los Angeles plants show that energy
conservation not only  conserves natural
resources, but can also  lead to increased
ability to comply with  air emissions regu-
lations. The greenhouse gas carbon diox-
ide  is released by all wastewater treat-
ment  and biosolids  management pro-
cesses.  Converting biosolids to fuel
achieves  substantial  benefit from  the
wastes before carbon dioxide is ultimately
released.  In addition,  nonrenewable  en-
ergy sources such as natural gas are re-
placed by the  renewable energy from
wastewater, without adversely affecting
receiving water quality.
  Plants can address environmental man-
dates in an integrated framework based
on energy conservation, through the use
of renewable resources. As the case stud-
ies prove,  activities that conserve energy
also  reduce pollution costs.

"Assessment of CO2 Capture,
Utilization, and Disposal,"
Howard J. Herzog,
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
  The capture and sequestration (via utili-
zation or disposal) of CO2 is the only green-
house gas mitigation option that will allow
use of our large  fossil fuel  resources with-
out a buildup of atmospheric  CO2.  This
paper assesses the current status and
research  needs of this mitigation option
as applied to fossil-fuel-fired power plants.

"'Front Line' CO2 Abatements
from the Steel Industry,"
Britt R. Gilbert, TORESCO, Ltd.
  Worldwide CO2 emissions from conven-
tional steelmaking exceed 1.1 billion tons
per  year.  But  a  new  generation  of
ironmaking technologies  will significantly
decrease these emissions by perhaps 75%
in the coming decades.
  One of these  new ironmaking technolo-
gies, the COREX® process, was the cen-
tral technology  in an  iron/methanol  co-
production facility being developed by the
author  near Pittsburgh. The author pre-
sents carbon balances for iron/methanol
co-production that show  dramatic reduc-
tions in CO2 emissions, compared to con-
ventional iron and  methanol production.
He discusses the factors which ultimately
doomed his project, and assesses the like-
lihood of  success  in the near term for
similar projects  based on new iron and
steelmaking technologies. Such  projects
are now  beginning to  be built, and  are
yielding dramatic decreases in  CO2 emis-
sions. He  details how a CO2 trading pro-
gram would greatly hasten the adoption of
these new ironmaking technologies by the
steel industry.

"Electrochemical  Reduction of
CO2 to Fuels,"
Daniel L. DuBois,  National
Renewable Energy Laboratory

-------
  A potentially useful  approach to liquid
fuel synthesis in the future may  involve
the direct electrochemical reduction  of CO2.
This paper describes some of the prob-
lems which must be  overcome for this
approach  to  become  feasible.  Possible
energy and CO2 sources are discussed
briefly. The major focus of the discussion
is on  the properties which  catalysts for
electrochemical CO2 reduction should pos-
sess. A brief  review of various catalytic
systems currently under study in a num-
ber of laboratories is presented to  assess
the present state of the art and the prob-
lems which need to  be overcome.

"The Carnol Process for CO2
Mitigation from Power Plants
and the Transportation Sector,"
Meyer Steinberg, Brookhaven
National Laboratory
  A CO2 mitigation  process is developed
which  converts waste  CO2 primarily re-
covered from coal-fired  plant stack gases
with natural gas, to  produce methanol as
a liquid fuel and coproduct carbon as a
materials commodity. The Carnol process
chemistry consists of methane decompo-
sition to produce hydrogen that is catalyti-
cally reacted  with  the  recovered waste
CO2 to produce methanol. The carbon is
either  stored  or sold as a  materials com-
modity. A process design is  modeled and
mass and energy balances are presented
as a function of reactor pressure and tem-
perature conditions. The Carnol process
is a viable alternative to sequestering CO2
in the ocean for purposes of reducing CO2
emissions from coal  burning power plants.
Over 90% of the CO2 from the coal burn-
ing  plant  is used in the  process which
results in a net CO2  emission reduction of
over 90% compared to that obtained from
conventional  methanol production by
steam reforming of methane. Methanol as
an alternative liquid fuel  for automotive
engines and for fuel cells achieves addi-
tional CO2 emission reduction benefits. The
economics of the process are greatly en-
hanced when carbon  can  be sold as a
materials commodity. Improvement in pro-
cess design  and economics should be
achieved  by  developing a molten metal
(tin) methane  decomposition reactor and
a liquid phase, slurry  catalyst, methanol
synthesis  reactor directly  using the sol-
vent saturated with CO2 scrubbed from
the power plant stack gases. The benefits
of the process warrants its further devel-
opments.
Session IV

Biomass Utilization
(Robert H. Williams, Princeton
University, Session
Chairperson)

"Demonstration ofal MWe
Biomass Power Plant,"

Carol R. Purvis, EPA
Patrick Myers, RTI
Mounir Mazzawi, Mech-Chem
Associates,  Inc.
  The  EPA's NRMRL/APPCD, formerly
EPA's Air and  Energy Engineering Re-
search  Laboratory (AEERL), is cooperat-
ing with the Research Triangle Institute to
demonstrate that converting wood energy
to electrical power results in waste utiliza-
tion, pollution alleviation,  and energy con-
servation.
  The project is expected to demonstrate
the technical, economic, and environmen-
tal feasibility of  an innovative energy con-
version technology,  producing approxi-
mately 1 MWe,  at the Marine Corps  Base,
Camp Lejeune, NC.  Camp Lejeune will
supply wood waste for power plant opera-
tion while minimizing  transport and  maxi-
mizing local waste resource utilization. The
technology for the process and the site at
Camp Lejeune  have  been selected, de-
sign  specifications are presently  under-
way, and installation, start-up, testing, and
demonstration will soon follow. This  paper
provides details  of the status of this project.

"Development of a New
Generation of Small Scale
Biomass Fueled Electric
Generating Power Plants,"
Joe D. Craig, Cratech, Inc.
Carol R. Purvis, EPA
  There exists  a need by a large world-
wide market  for greatly  improved  small
scale (1 to 20  MWe per unit)  biomass-
fueled power plants. These power plants
will significantly increase  the efficiency of
generating electric power from wood and
bagasse  as well  as converting   non-
traditional fuel sources such as rice hulls,
animal  manure, cotton gin trash, straws,
and grasses  to electricity. Advancing the
technology of biomass-fueled power plants
will greatly expand the use of this environ-
mentally-friendly  sustainable  24  h/day
source of electrical power for industry and
communities worldwide. This paper briefly
describes the status of a biomass-fueled
power  plant  being  development by
Cratech, Inc.
"Installation of an ENERGEO
Biomass Power Plant at a
Lumber Company,"
Charles F. Sanders ENERGEO,
Inc.
Carol R. Purvis, EPA
  ENERGEO, Inc. is engaged in a dem-
onstration test program of its AGRIPOWER
200 unit  fueled with biomass at Sutton
Lumber Company in Tennga, GA. The
objective of the program is to evaluate the
operating and performance characteristics
of the  system using lumber wastes for
fuel. The program is scheduled to accu-
mulate  8000 hours of operation  over a
period of 1 to 2 years. The program be-
came a reality due to initial funding from
the U.S.  Department of Defense (DoD)
Strategic Environmental Research and
Development Program (SERDP)  and the
EPA Air and Energy Engineering Research
Laboratory (now referred to as APPCD,
Research Triangle Park).
  The  AGRIPOWER unit  operates with
an "open" Brayton cycle using a fluid bed
combustor and several  heat exchangers
to heat  compressed air which in turn drives
a turbine/generator (T/G)  set. The T/G
set, which includes the compressor and a
recuperator, is a Solar "Spartan" unit pack-
aged for this application by Alturdyne, Inc.
The combustor utilizes  in-bed and  free-
board combustion zones, and the above-
bed zone is well mixed to provide uniform
temperatures.
  Design specifications call for consump-
tion of  829 Ib/h (376 kg/h) of fuel with a
lower heating value of 4,270 Btu/lb (9.92
MJ/kg). The  net electrical  power output
will be  approximately 200 kW-hr/hr. This
corresponds to a heat rate of 17,700 Btu/
kW-hr (41.3  MJ/kW-hr). The capital cost
of an AGRIPOWER 200 unit will be ap-
proximately $2,250/kW of capacity.

"An Indirectly Heated
Thermochemical Reactor for
Steam Reforming/Gasification
of Biomass and Other
Carbonaceous Materials,"
Momtaz Mansour,
Manufacturing and  Technology
Conversion International,  Inc.
  Manufacturing and Technology Conver-
sion  International,  Inc. (MTCI) is a pro-
cess and hardware oriented energy and
environmental technology development
company located  in Columbia, MD, with
manufacturing and development  facilities
in Santa Fe Springs, CA, and Curtis Bay,
MD. Based on the principles and merits of

-------
pulse combustion, the Company is devel-
oping clean coal  burners  and fluid-bed
combustors, low NOx combustors, particu-
late emissions control devices, and (now
entering the market) the indirectly heated
steam reformer/gasifier for waste-to-energy
conversion  and the  conversion of coals,
renewables, and industrial and municipal
wastes (including  toxins) into  clean fuel
forms for IGCC and combined-cycle power
systems. For the pulp and paper industry
the MTCI technology steam reformer/gas-
ifier can process all  kinds of spent liquor
for energy  and process chemical recov-
ery.

"Cost Versus Scale for
Advanced Plantation-Based
Biomass Energy Systems in the
U.S.,"
Christopher I.  Marrison' and
Eric D. Larson, Princeton
University
  A unique  feature of biomass energy sys-
tems is that feedstock  must be gathered
from a  wide area around the energy pro-
duction facility. For a small-scale facility,
transport costs will be  relatively  low,  but
capital  cost per unit of output will  be high.
For a large-scale  facility, transport costs
will be  high, but capital costs will be rela-
tively low. At some intermediate scale, the
total  cost of energy should  reach a mini-
mum. This  paper examines the effects of
scale on the prospective costs  of produc-
ing electricity and alcohol fuels  from plan-
tation-grown switchgrass in  North Central
and Southeast regions of the U.S.
  Site-specific biomass cost-supply curves
for the years  2000 and 2020  are devel-
oped using  projections of the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory for switchgrass yields
and costs as a function of land capability
class. A geographic information system
(CIS) is used to analyze soil quality distri-
butions and road transport distances.
  Conversion  technologies considered in-
clude one commercial electricity generat-
ing technology—the steam Rankine cycle,
and  one nearing  commercial  readiness,
the gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle.
Two  alcohol fuels are considered: metha-
nol  via  thermochemical gasification and
ethanol via  enzymatic hydrolysis. Both of
these processes have the potential to be
commercially ready early in the next cen-
tury or sooner.  Estimates of installed capi-
tal costs for all of these  conversion sys-
tems are drawn from published and other
sources.
  In  all cases, the minimum cost of elec-
tricity (COE/min) or alcohol (COA/min) is
reached at plant capacities that are larger
than conventional wisdom might suggest.
Up  to these capacities,  the  rate of de-
crease in unit capital costs is more rapid
than the rate of increase in biomass trans-
portation costs. However,  around the ca-
pacity corresponding to COE/min or COA/
min, there  is a wide range  over which
costs change very little. In general, higher
biomass yields lead to larger capacities at
COE/min or COA/min. Costs are higher in
the  NC than SE region, and  (in both re-
gions) costs are lower using year-2020
biomass costs compared  to  year-2000
costs.

"Greenhouse Gas Implications
and Mitigation Opportunities for
Integrated Biomass Systems,"
Jane Hughes Turnbull,  Electric
Power Research Institute
UlfBoman,  Vattenfall
UtvecklingAB
  Integrated biomass energy systems that
include crop resources grown  as fuel offer
a means of displacing fossil fuel systems
and thus the emissions of carbon dioxide
produced by the combustion  of fossil fu-
els.  Energy  crops directly utilize carbon
dioxide as a nutrient; therefore, a biomass
power system  is a "closed loop" carbon
system only  so far as the conversion part
of the  system is  concerned.  Other as-
pects of the total fuel cycle will impact the
"no  net carbon dioxide" axiom. Trade-offs
among options  associated with  produc-
tion, handling, and transportation will im-
pact costs, energy inputs, or other system
values. Fossil fuel inputs associated with
agricultural or forestry equipment need to
be considered. Fossil fuel use in the pro-
duction  and distribution  of  agricultural
chemicals  also is a significant concern.
Coproducts should be evaluated  insofar
as they  may displace alternative produc-
tion systems that would  use added quan-
tities of fossil fuels.  Intelligent  selection of
crops, rotation periods,  and  agricultural
practices can  also affect the extent to
which carbon may be sequestered using
lands that have been in conventional agri-
culture. The potential  for soils, on which
high-yielding energy crops are grown, to
be used as carbon sinks is only beginning
to be appreciated.  Soil carbon sequestra-
tion  may well become  as important a
means for mitigating greenhouse gas emis-
sions as the use of biomass energy sys-
tems to displace fossil fuels.

"Cost of Producing Herbaceous
and Woody Biomass Crops in
the U.S.,"
Marie E. Walsh, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory
  Switchgrass  and hybrid poplar are po-
tential renewable sources of liquid fuels,
power, and  chemicals.  This  paper esti-
mates the full economic cost (i.e., variable
cash,  fixed cash, and opportunity cost of
owned resources) of producing these en-
ergy crops in six regions in the U.S. Aver-
age production  costs vary by region, rang-
ing  from $29 to $59/dry ton ($26-54/Mg)
for switchgrass bales  and $61 to $83/dry
ton  ($55-75/Mg) for poplar chips. Within a
region, production costs decline substan-
tially as yields  increase. Estimated biom-
ass prices needed to  ensure comparable
profitability with  conventional crops are
lower for switchgrass than for hybrid pop-
lar,  and are higher in the Lake States and
Corn  Belt  than for other regions of the
U.S.

"Methanol and Hydrogen from
Biomass for Transportation,
with Comparisons to  Methanol
and Hydrogen from Natural Gas
and Coal,"
Robert H.  Williams,  Eric D.
Larson, Ryan E. Katofsky, Jeff
Chen, Princeton University
  Methanol and hydrogen produced from
biomass via indirectly heated gasifiers and
their use in fuel cell vehicles would make
it possible for biomass to be used for road
transportation,  with zero  or near-zero  lo-
cal air pollution and very low levels of life-
cycle CO2 emissions, if the biomass feed-
stock is grown  sustainably. Moreover, be-
cause this approach to using biomass  for
transport fuels  involves such  an  efficient
use of land, it offers the potential for mak-
ing major contributions in  reducing depen-
dence on insecure sources of oil for trans-
portation.
  Biomass-derived methanol  and hydro-
gen would  be roughly  competitive with
these fuels produced at much larger scale
(to  exploit scale economies) from  coal,
even with  relatively high biomass feed-
stock prices.  While  biomass-derived
methanol and hydrogen would not be able
to compete with  the production of these
fuels from natural gas in the near term,
natural gas  prices are expected  to rise
substantially over the  next decade or so.
With natural-gas prices expected by 2010,
biomass would be nearly  competitive with
natural gas in the production of these  fu-
els.  A carbon tax that would increase the
cost of owning  and operating fuel cell ve-
hicles on natural gas-derived fuels by less
than 2%  would  be adequate to  tip the
economic balance in favor of biomass.
  The production of methanol for export
in developing regions could provide sus-

-------
tainable new income streams for rural ar-
eas in  developing regions while bringing
competition and fuel price stability to world
markets in transport fuels.

"Hydrogen from Biomass via
Fast Pyrolysis,"
E. Chornet, M. Mann, D. Wang,
D. Montane, S. Czernik, and D.
Johnson, National Renewable
Laboratory
  The  mission of DOE's Hydrogen  Pro-
gram is to encourage and  support  the
development of safe, practical, and  eco-
nomically competitive hydrogen technolo-
gies and systems to meet transitional and
large-scale energy  needs. By 2025,  the
percentage of energy from oil imports to
the U.S. could be reduced from the cur-
rent 50 to 60% to less than 25%, if hydro-
gen energy were to contribute only  10%
to the overall energy  use. The Hydrogen
Program will meet these  challenges with
fundamental  and applied research,  sys-
tems demonstrations, and systems stud-
ies.
  Pyrolysis of biomass and steam reform-
ing of the resultant oils is being studied as
a strategy for the production of hydrogen.
New technologies for the rapid  pyrolysis
of biomass provide compact and efficient
systems to transform biomass into vapors
that are condensed to oils, with yields as
high as 75 to 80% by weight of the anhy-
drous biomass. A process of this  nature
has the potential to be cost competitive
with conventional means of hydrogen pro-
duction.
  The  use of biomass is an alternative to
producing  hydrogen  from petroleum and
natural  gas, and  the  environmental  ben-
efits  are  several  fold. If  the biomass is
grown  on  a sustainable basis as an  en-
ergy crop,  there is a zero  net carbon diox-
ide contribution to the atmosphere. Biom-
ass crops can be grown as  barriers  be-
tween  crop land  and natural water  sys-
tems, to prevent  fertilizer runoff. Further-
more, crop rotation and harvesting can be
timed to offer habitat to birds and animals.
Waste  biomass from sources such  as ag-
riculture and urban  waste  can also be
used to produce hydrogen by  this  pro-
cess. Using this  source of biomass  miti-
gates landfill disposal and eliminates the
methane produced during natural decom-
position.
  Using hydrogen as a fuel offers addi-
tional environmental  benefits.  Hydrogen
can be used  in  a fuel  cell to produce
electricity,  with water as the only product.
When combusted, for example in an inter-
nal combustion engine, far fewer nitrogen
oxide compounds are released than dur-
ing the combustion of fossil fuels. There
are no carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide,
or particulates emitted when hydrogen is
converted to energy.

"The Hynol Process,"
Robert H. Borgwardt, EPA
  This paper describes  a process  cur-
rently under evaluation  by EPA for  pro-
duction of transportation  fuel from biom-
ass.  If biofuel is  to  significantly impact
petroleum  displacement and greenhouse
emissions  in the  transportation sector,
maximum  yield  of fuel  energy  from  the
available biomass supply  must be  ob-
tained. It will also be necessary to supple-
ment  biofuel with other fuels or leverage
its production by  use of a  cofeedstock.
The fuel should also  be  compatible  with
vehicles powered by fuel cells which prom-
ise considerable overall future environmen-
tal benefits.  Methanol appears to be  the
best  alternative fuel  to  meet these  re-
quirements,  and this  investigation is fo-
cused on thermochemical technologies that
can increase methanol yield from biom-
ass by utilizing natural  gas as cofeedstock.
The  process currently under evaluation
produces methanol in three basic steps:
hydrogasification of biomass followed by
steam reforming to synthesis gas and con-
version of the synthesis  gas to methanol.
Hydrogen derived  from the natural gas is
recycled to the gasifier to provide part of
the  thermal  energy for gasification;  the
remaining energy required for gasification
is obtained  by heat  exchange  with  the
reformer effluent.  This assessment  was
carried out using  the process  simulator
Aspen Plus. The assumptions necessary
for such simulations are,  wherever pos-
sible, consistent with those published else-
where for other  process options. Results
indicate that testing in  actual equipment is
needed, with stringent conditions to be
met in each  process step if the  expected
efficiency is to be realized.

Session V

Renewables and Advanced
Energy Efficient,  End-Use
Technologies
(Thomas D. Bath, NREL,
Session Chairperson)

"Greenhouse Gas Mitigation:
The Potential for Renewable
Energy,"
Thomas D. Bath and Jack
Stone, National Renewable
Energy Laboratory
  This paper reviews  the opportunity for
different forms of renewable energy to re-
duce emissions of greenhouse gases, do-
mestically and in the international context.
It builds on the results of earlier work, by
several groups,  intended to explore this
potential. This work showed that these
technologies can  play a significant role in
the longer term (25 years or more).  The
paper also  identifies additional  possibili-
ties to  enhance these opportunities.  Key
factors in the outcome  are technology
progress, energy market characteristics,
and the influence of energy  and environ-
mental policies.  In  particular, the paper
explores the potential for synergisms be-
tween energy and environmental policies.
Our  general  conclusion  is that  major
changes in all of these areas are neces-
sary to reduce domestic and global emis-
sions.

"Pollution Prevention by
Consumer Choice: The Green
Pricing Option,"
Lloyd Wright, EPA
  Allowing consumers  to choose clean
energy resources  for their electricity needs
may be one  of  the most  cost-effective
options to  reduce greenhouse gases.
Through a concept  known as green  pric-
ing, participating consumers voluntarily pay
a  small premium to support renewable
energy technologies. Even  at  fairly low
participation rates of 1-5%, significant pol-
lution  reduction benefits are achieved.  In
addition to delivering greenhouse gas re-
ductions at less than $50 per metric ton,
green pricing  can dramatically transform
the U.S. renewable energy  market.  This
market-based approach  also helps elec-
tric utilities prepare  for a  competitive en-
ergy  marketplace. And  all of this  is
achieved voluntarily, with  no costs to  non-
participants, the  government, or electric
utilities.

"Risk, Accounting and
Strategic Planning Issues in
Integrated Resource Planning
(IRP) Resource Selection,"
Shimon Awerbuch,
Independent Economic
Consultant
  This paper reviews what has  been
learned from the  valuation of new  manu-
facturing technologies,  and  extends the
results to energy  resource options. Tradi-
tional  IRP procedures can be misleading:
they rely on one attribute, dollars per kilo-
watt-hour, which  does  not  properly  cap-
ture the important  benefits renewables pro-
vide through risk reduction, flexibility, over-
head reductions, and supply-demand equi-
librium. When properly  evaluated using

-------
these concepts, photovoltaics and  other
renewables appear considerably more cost
effective than previously believed. Proper
valuation of externalities, the present value
costs of which are significantly understated
in most analyses using inappropriate dis-
count rates, swings the balance further in
favor of renewables.

"Pollution Mitigation and
Photovoltaic Demand-Site
Results from the U.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency Photovoltaic
Demonstrations,"
Edward C. Kern, Jr.  and Daniel
L. Green berg, Ascension
Technology, Inc.
Ronald J.  Spiegel, EPA
  The EPA, 21 electric power companies
in the U.S.,  and  the Electric  Power Re-
search Institute are  conducting two na-
tionwide Photovoltaic (PV)  Demand-Side
Management  (DSM) projects. Ascension
Technology is responsible for system de-
sign, balance-of-systems equipment de-
sign  and fabrication, installation supervi-
sion, field  instrumentation,  and  data ac-
quisition, monitoring, and  evaluation. The
principal goal of the two projects  is  to
investigate the environmental and  DSM
benefits of distributed,  grid-tied PV sys-
tems  as  pollution-mitigating  energy  re-
placements for fossil fuels.  In 1993-4, 11
electric utilities installed  PV  on  homes,
schools, hospitals, offices, and light com-
mercial buildings.  In 1994-5,  12 electric
utilities are installing PV systems on  larger
commercial,  educational,  and industrial
building rooftops.

"Photovoltaic Energy Impacts
on U.S. CO2Emissions,"
S.C. Morris, J.C. Lee, P.D.
Moskowitz, and G.A. Goldstein,
Brookhaven National
Laboratory
  The  potential role  of photovoltaic (PV)
technology in reducing CO2 emissions was
evaluated in an energy-environmental eco-
nomic systems model.  The model exam-
ines  the role of PV energy systems in a
competitive market environment. PV tech-
nology is already  competitive for certain
niche markets. Further growth  in  those
markets is  expected as well as expansion
into other markets. Decreasing cost pen-
alties should provide greater incentive for
expansion of niche markets. This analysis
indicated that, while PV was not projected
to be competitive as a  general source  of
electricity supply to the grid by 2030, it did
become an attractive technology for this
purpose after 2010  under carbon emis-
sion  constraint,  even if the carbon con-
straint was limited to  stability of emissions
at the 1990 level.

"Electric Vehicles: A Source for
Energy Security and Clean Air,"
Lawrence G. O'Connell,
Electric Power Research
Institute
  Electric vehicles (EVs) can help  solve
the  problems created by the  transporta-
tion sector's heavy dependence on petro-
leum-based fuels.  Studies show that us-
ing EVs could significantly decrease emis-
sions that contribute to urban  air quality
problems. Further, they emit less carbon
dioxide than  gasoline-powered vehicles,
and therefore could  be part of a green-
house gas reduction  strategy.  In addition,
because only a small portion of electricity
used in the  U.S.  is  generated from oil,
replacing conventional  vehicles with EVs
could help move the nation toward greater
energy security. In recognition of these
potential benefits,  legislation and regula-
tions are encouraging, and even mandat-
ing, zero  emission vehicles, or EVs, pro-
duction and  use.  Automakers have re-
sponded by starting EV development pro-
grams that promise viable vehicles in time
to meet the legislative requirements. The
electric utility industry,  in turn, has  been
laying the foundation for the infrastructure
to support wider use of this beneficial tech-
nology.

"Why Not Plug Your House and
Workplace Into Your Fuel Cell
Car?,"
Robert Williams and Kelly
Kissock, Princeton University
  As an alternative  to the internal  com-
bustion engine,  the  fuel cell  offers the
potential for  providing transportation ser-
vices with zero or near-zero pollutant emis-
sions, with large reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions, and with reduced energy
insecurity through the use of a wide range
of feedstocks for fuel as alternatives to oil
from politically unstable regions. Moreover,
there are good prospects that, when mass-
produced, fuel cell cars would be able to
compete with internal combustion engine
cars  on a  life-cycle basis, owing to their
greater energy efficiency and prospective
lower maintenance  costs, and perhaps
even on a first-cost basis.
  If the fuel  cell  comes to  replace the
internal combustion engine in transporta-
tion applications, it could radically trans-
form not just transportation but stationary
power generation as  well—if "the building
is plugged into the car when the car is not
being driven." This possibility is motivated
by consideration that  fuel  cell vehicles
could potentially provide heat and power
for buildings with zero pollution, with  very
little noise, and without the need for oper-
ating personnel, and by the fact that while
cars  are operated during 10 years of  use-
ful life for only 3,500 to 5,000 hours (about
a half hour a day), the fuel cell itself might
last 50,000 to 60,000 hours or more.
  This paper assesses technical and  eco-
nomic aspects  of cogenerating electricity
and  heat for residential and commercial
buildings  using proton-exchange-mem-
brane (PEM) fuel cells in cars.  Because
PEM fuel  cells typically operate at tem-
peratures of less than 100°C, particular
attention is paid to the design and control
of the heat recovery  and storage system
and its  interface with the thermal require-
ments of buildings. System performance
is simulated on an hour-by-hour basis for
residential and  commercial buildings.
  This  preliminary investigation  suggests
that the  idiosyncratic concept of "fuel cell
car cogeneration"  is  not whimsical  and
should  be given careful consideration as
an innovative element in the portfolio of
options that  could be deployed by the
distributed utility of the future.

Free-Piston Stirling Engines  for
Domestic Cogeneration and
Biomass Energy Conversion,"
W. T. Beale,  Sunpower, Inc.
  This  successful development of long-
life free-piston  machines for domestic re-
frigeration has brought into  existence
Stirling  engine designs which can be  con-
figured for electric power generation using
biomass  or  other sustainable energy
sources. This paper describes the design
and performance of machines suitable for
near-term commercial production for natu-
ral gas and  biomass-fired domestic  and
light  industrial  congeneration at the  1 to
10 kW power range.

"Commercialization of Wind
Power and Its Potential Impact
on Greenhouse Gas
Emissions,"
Susan Hock, NREL
John B. Cadogan, DOE
Joseph M. Cohen and Bertrand
L. Johnson, Princeton
Economic Research, Inc.
  Commercialization  and deployment ac-
tivities associated with wind power have
accelerated  recently,  in the  U.S.  and
abroad. The current installed base of util-

-------
ity-connected wind power is  summarized
and derivative calculations of electric gen-
eration and associated  displacement of
greenhouse  gas emissions are  made.
Technology  and  market development
trends are reviewed and DOE-sponsored
wind technology development and deploy-
ment activities  are discussed. Finally, an
overview of competitive market consider-
ations is given, including an analysis of
the projected  competitiveness  of wind
power compared to gas-fired generation
to the year 2005.

"Fuzzy-Logic-Based Adaptive
Control of AC Induction Motors
for Energy Optimization,"
R.J. Spiegel and P.J. Chappell,
EPA
M.W. Turner, RTI
  Fuzzy-logic control of alternating-current
(AC) induction motors is being investigated
under sponsorship of EPA for energy effi-
ciency optimization and performance en-
hancement. An energy optimizing control-
ler utilizing fuzzy logic has  been devel-
oped to  improve the efficiency of motor/
drive combinations running at various load
and  speed  conditions.  The   energy
optimizer is complemented by a sensorless
speed  controller which  maintains motor
shaft revolutions per minute (RPM) to pro-
duce constant output  power.  Efficiency
gains from  approximately  1  to 20% are
obtained  from laboratory  demonstration
with commercial motors and drives. Motor
shaft RPM is controlled to within 0.9%.

"Fuzzy-Logic-Based Adaptive
Control of a Variable Speed
Wind Turbine,"
R.J. Spiegel, EPA
B.K. Bose, University of
Tennessee
  Fuzzy-logic control of a variable-speed
wind turbine is being investigated under
sponsorship of EPA for efficiency optimi-
zation and performance enhancement. The
control  system consists of three  fuzzy-
logic controllers: a controller to track the
turbine  generator speed with wind velocity
to  extract the maximum output power; a
controller to optimize the generator airgap
magnetic flux for efficiency improvement;
and a controller to provide for robust speed
control  against wind gusts and turbine os-
cillatory torque. The paper describes the
control  system which has been developed,
as well  as early stages of work to validate
the design and document the performance
obtained.
                                                         10

-------
   Sue Philpott is with Acurex Environmental Corp., Research  Triangle Park, NC
     27709
   Keith J. Fritsky is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Proceedings: The 1995 Symposium on Greenhouse
     Gas Emissions and Mitigation Research," (Order No. PB96-96-187752; Cost:
     $85.00 - $170.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
          National Risk Management Research Laboratory
          U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
National Risk Management Research Laboratory (G-72)
Cincinnati, OH 45268

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
EPA/600/SR-96/072

-------