**>
\ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
American Recoveiy and Reinvestment Act
Quarterly Performance Repoit
FY 2012 Quarter 3
Cumulative Results as of June 30, 2012
July 30,2012
-------
Table of Contents
Background and Jobs Created
FY 2012 Quarter 3 Highlights
Clean Water State Revolving Fund 4
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund 6
Diesel Emissions Reductions 8
Brownfields
..10
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 12
Superfund 14
Inspector General 16
Appendix: Recovery Act Performance Measures and Results 17
Funding by Program
$4.500
$4.000
$3.500
$3.000
~t $2.500
a
I $2.000
$1,500
$1.000
$500
$-
$4.000
S300
S200
S100
Clean Water Drinking Water Superfund
SRF SRF
Diesel Underground Brownfields
Ems 5 ions Storage
Tanks
-------
Background
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) has been an unprecedented effort
to jumpstart our economy, create or save millions of jobs, and address long-neglected challenges
emerging in the 21st century. The Recovery Act includes $7.22 billion for programs
administered by EPA to protect and promote both green jobs and a healthier environment.
EPA began tracking program performance at the end of Fiscal Year 2009. The following report
provides a summary of the performance EPA and its partners have achieved through June 30,
2012 (Quarter 3, Fiscal Year 2012) in the six key environmental programs funded by the
Recovery Act and efforts by the Office of the Inspector General. Each section includes general
background information on the program, performance metrics, cumulative results and cumulative
long-term targets, and examples of progress. The environmental programs invest in clean water
and drinking water projects, implement diesel emission reduction technologies, clean up leaking
underground storage tanks, revitalize and reuse brownfields, and clean up Superfund sites. To
learn more about the Recovery Act implementation at EPA, visit www.epa.gov/recovery.
In order to ensure accountability and demonstrate progress toward meeting program goals, EPA
will provide quarterly performance updates consistent with the timing of quarterly recipient
reporting. While this report contains the cumulative results since the Recovery Act began, visit
www.epa.gov/recovery/plans.htmltfreports to review weekly financial and activity reports.
Jobs Report
The Recovery Act has created and retained jobs through its implementation over the past several
years. As the table below demonstrates, 4,262 jobs have been funded by ARRA appropriations as
reported by recipients from April 1 to June 30, 2012.l To view EPA recipient reported data for
your state, visit EPA Recipient Reporting on www.recovery.gov.
Recipient Reported Jobs Created by EPA Recovery Act Funds
1 6 nnfi -
X
O
-
v- 1 1 r\r\ri -
c c nnn
z
4 nnn
3,899
6,788
9.671
16,603
KPI
10,629
7,263
7,170
"^1 i 4.262
1 3,280 I .
June 09- 0<±09- Jan. 10- Apr. 10- July 10- OctlO- Jan. 11- Apr. 11- July 11- Octll- Jan. i: - Apr. i: -
Sept. 09 Dec.09 Mar. 10 June 10 Sept 10 Dec. 10 Mar. 11 June 11 Sept 11 Dec. 11 Mar. 12 June 12
Each quarter of jobs data represents a snap-shot in time of the number of jobs funded by Recovery Act for the particular quarter; the results
should not be added cumulatively. Note that the data represented in this chart is the responsibility of the recipients of EPA Recovery Act funds,
and while EPA does conduct a quality check of the data, the primary responsibility for jobs counts resides with the recipients. Also, a continuous
review period for each quarter lasts 75 days, which means the total draft reported jobs numbers presented could change after this report has been
finalized.
2
-------
FY 2012 Quarter 3 Highlights
As of June 30, 2012
Clean Water State Revolving Fund
1,871 projects started construction and 1,247 projects completed
construction
93 Tribal projects started construction and 42 completed
construction
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
1,332 projects started construction and 826 projects completed
construction
64 Tribal projects started and 44 projects completed construction
Diesel Emissions Reductions
27,300 old diesel engines retrofitted, replaced, or retired
Reduced lifetime emissions of carbon dioxide
by over 742,200 tons and particulate matter by 3,550 tons
Brownfields
802 properties assessed with 61 properties cleaned up
175 properties totaling 929 acres are ready for reuse
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
1,545 site assessments initiated and 2,305 completed
2,212 cleanups initiated and 2,288 completed
45 of the 54 states and territories that received ARRA money
completed their work
Superfund
27 remedial action projects have expended 100% of their
obligated funds
9 sites have achieved construction completion
-------
Clean Water State Revolving Fund
The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), in place since 1987, provides funds to states
to capitalize state loan revolving funds that finance infrastructure improvements for public
wastewater systems and other water quality projects. The EPA provides direct grants to
Washington, DC and the territories for similar purposes.
The EPA received $4 billion for the CWSRF that includes funds for water quality management
planning grants with up to 1% reserved for federal management and oversight and 1.5% for
Tribes. EPA awarded grants to states and Puerto Rico for their state revolving fund programs,
from which assistance is provided to finance eligible high priority water infrastructure projects.
The states play a critical role by selecting projects, dispersing funds, and overseeing spending.
Projects were selected based on public health and environmental factors, and readiness to
proceed with construction capability. In addition, states were also required to provide at least
20% of their grants for green projects (i.e., green infrastructure, energy or water efficiency
improvements, and environmentally innovative activities). States had the option to retain up to
4% of available funds for program administration. Visit www.epa.gov/water/eparecovery to
learn more about the CWSRF.
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
States certified that all project funding was under contract by the February 17, 2010 deadline and
at least 20% of their funds went to green projects. Collectively, states far surpassed the 20%
requirement, providing a national total of $1.13 billion, or 30% of all funds.
Amount of CWSRF Projects
Starting and Completing Construction (non-tribal)
Target
Starting
Completing
Q4
FY10
Q4
FY11
Q3
FY12
-------
Amount of CWSRT Projects
Starting and Completing Construction (tribal)
GO
«£ 40
The St. Mary's County Metropolitan Commission utilized a
CWSRF loan under Recovery Act for an energy reuse project. This
project reduced emissions of methane gas from the sewage
treatment process while simultaneously lowering energy costs. The
funding contributed to the construction, administrative and
contingency costs of the Marlay-Taylor Water Reclamation
Methane Power Co-Generation and Digester Upgrade project. After
final construction, the methane produced from on-site sewage
treatment will be used for the production of electrical energy for use
in the treatment facility. Additionally, rejected heat will supply the
digester's heating requirements. These energy savings will be
achieved through the installation of 2,165 kilowatt generators and
improvements to the digesters. The St. Mary's County Metropolitan
Commission project is an example of an innovative way to reduce
both methane emissions an energy costs without great expansion
into previously undisturbed land on the farm.
The wastewater treatment plant of Columbus, Indiana needed severe upgrades
for continued operation. The majority of the main process equipment had
reached the end of its useful life, and as a result, the city decided to build a
new plant. Using a CWSRF loan with principal forgiveness under Recovery
Act, Columbus constructed a new plant with average design flow consistent
with anticipated growth in the city. Plus, the construction of a new plant had
the added benefit of enabling the city to incorporate sustainable infrastructure.
For example, the incorporation of the Cannibal process will reduce sludge
disposal requirements by 85% by conditioning a portion of the return
activated sludge to biodegrade in a side stream reactor prior to reintroduction
of the aeration basins. Additionally, energy consumption will be reduced due
to the addition of variable frequency drives, geothermal heating and air
conditioning units, high efficiency lighting, sensor light controls, and other
building components. This project demonstrates ways that sustainable projects
can help the CWSRF move forward in a more environmentally friendly and
cost-effective way.
-------
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
The Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended in 1996, established the Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund (DWSRF) to make funds available to drinking water systems to finance
infrastructure improvements. Under the Recovery Act, EPA received $2 billion for the DWSRF
with up to 1% of fund reserved for federal management and oversight and 1.5% for Tribes.
The program emphasizes the provision of funds to small and disadvantaged communities and to
programs that encourage pollution prevention as a tool for ensuring safe drinking water. The
DWSRF provides funds to states to establish state loan revolving funds that finance
infrastructure improvements for public and private Community Water Systems and not-for-profit
Non-Community Water Systems and direct grants to Washington, DC and the territories.
The DWSRF consists of 51 state financing programs (includes Puerto Rico) which comply with
federal statute and regulations. States must provide at least 20% of their grants for green projects
(i.e., green infrastructure, energy or water efficiency improvements, and environmentally
innovative activities) and may retain up to 4% of available funds for program administration. To
learn more about the DWSRF implementation of the Recovery Act, visit
www. epa. gov/water/eparecovery.
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
Over a thousand projects have initiated construction that will bring safe drinking water to many
people across the country. Like the CWSRF, the states certified that all project funding was
under contract by the February 17, 2010 deadline and at least 20% of their funds went to green
projects. Many states surpassed the 20% minimum with the average amount of green reserve
totaling $500 million or 29% of all funds.
Amount of DAVSKF Projects
Starting and Completing Construction (non-tribal)
Target
Starring
Completing
03
FYI:
-------
Amount of DWSRF Projects
Starting aud Completing Construction (tribal)
Target
Starting
Completing
In Oklahoma, the City of Wagoner's cast iron water
mains were installed in the early 1900s. Corrosion
has accumulated in the pipe, creating low operating
pressures. Water main problems affect 75 businesses
on West Cherokee Street alone, including a hospital
that has to reschedule surgeries when water service is
interrupted. The City received funds to replace aging
water lines in several areas of the community. In
addition, the City will purchase a portable generator
for its ground storage facility.
The community of Whiteriver, Arizona, in the heart of
the Fort Apache Indian Reservation, has experienced
significant population growth over the past decade
(61%). The community's source of drinking water, the
Miner Flat well field, has had its production reduced by
40% in the past few years while consumption has
increased. To ameliorate the situation, the EPA, Indian
Health Service (MS), Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and the White Mountain Apache Tribe
have collaborated in the planning, design, and
construction of an innovative surface diversion and
treatment system that will be completed this year.
-------
Diesel Emission Reductions
Diesel engines emit large amounts of air pollutants which contribute to serious public health
problems including asthma, lung cancer and various other cardiac and respiratory diseases. With
funds dispersed through four programs, regional, state and local governments, tribal agencies,
and non-profit organizations received approximately $300 million in grants and loans to support
the implementation of verified and certified diesel emission reduction technologies.
The program aims to accelerate emission reductions from older diesel engines to provide more
immediate air quality benefits and improve public health while using Recovery Act funds to
maximize job preservation and creation in order to promote economic recovery.
The Diesel Emission Reductions Act (DERA) awards grants, via the Recovery Act, through the
National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program, the State Clean Diesel Grant Program, the
Clean Diesel Emerging Technologies Funding Assistance Program, and the SmartWay Clean
Diesel Finance Program. Of the $300 million, $6 million has been reserved for federal
management and oversight. To learn more about the Diesel Emissions Reductions Program
implementation of the Recovery Act, visit www.epa.gov/otaq/eparecovery/index.htm.
Diesel Emissions Reductions Act (DERA)
Clean Diesel Funding Programs2
National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program
State Clean Diesel Grant Program3
Clean Diesel Emerging Technologies Funding Assistance Program
SmartWay Clean Diesel Finance Program
Total
Number of
ARRA Grants
90
51
14
5
160
Total Funds
($ Millions)
$156
$88
$20
$30
$294
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
Number of Existing Heavy Duty Diesel Engines
(Including School Buses) Retro fitted, Replaced, or Retired
Q3
FYI:
As indicated in the program plans, projects should be completed for the National, State, and Emerging Technology Funding
Assistance programs by the end of December 2010. SmartWay projects have until the end of December 2012 to complete.
3 The State Clean Diesel Grant Program allocates grants to all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
-------
Lifetime Reductions of Nitrous Oxide
(XOj) I missions
Q4
FT10
Q4
FY11
Q3
FYI:
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
is repowering a tugboat in Pittsburgh, one of the nation's
busiest ports. Approximately 100 tugboats service the
Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers that surround
Pittsburgh, and this project takes another step to ensure
cleaner air for the surrounding communities. The tugboat's
current Caterpillar Tier 1 engines will be upgraded to Tier 2
engines which will reduce emissions of oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) by 25%, hydrocarbons (HC) by 4%, particulate
matter (PM) by 33%, and carbon dioxide (CO2) by 1%. On
top of the improvements to public health and the
environment, this project will preserve 32 jobs for local
skilled trade workers like mechanics and welders, service
planners, shop supervisors, and hauling companies.
Old agricultural equipment emits harmful pollutants such
as particulate matter (PM) that can have significant health
impacts, and a number of counties in Utah have PM levels
above air quality standards. With the help of Recovery Act
grants, nine new tractors and new engines for 22 pieces of
farm equipment had been ordered to reduce air pollution.
Utah's Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ)
coordinated this project with farmers along the Northern
Wasatch Front. To find farmers and cattle ranchers who
wanted less polluting equipment, UDEQ worked with the
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food and Utah State
University. Participating farmers made it clear that without
the grants, they would not have been able to replace their
old equipment.
-------
Brownfields
A brownfield is a property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be
complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant. Under the Recovery Act, EPA received $100 million for the Brownfields
Program.
The funds provide awards for brownfields assessment, cleanup, new and supplemental
Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) and job training cooperative agreements through a competitive
process. Communities receive technical assistance and targeted brownfields assessments via
regional contracts and Interagency Agreements (IA). Activities to be performed under these
cooperative agreements include, but are not limited to:
assessments to identify the contaminants at properties and initiate cleanup planning;
direct cleanup of brownfield properties;
community involvement activities for property selection, cleanup and reuse planning;
and
training of participants in the handling and removal of hazardous substances,
including training for environmental jobs (including, environmental sampling,
analysis, and remediation techniques).
EPA awarded $87.3 million to communities for assessments and cleanups of contaminated
land through cooperative agreements. An additional $9.2 million was distributed by EPA
regional offices for targeted brownfields assessments in communities with the remaining $3.5
million used for federal management and oversight. To learn more about the Brownfields
Program implementation of the Recovery Act, visit www. epa. gov/brownfields/eparecovery/.
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
Number of Brownfield Assessments
Initiated and Completed
03
FY12
10
-------
Number of Broimfield Cleanups
Initiated and Completed
Rowland, Maine is a rural community located 35 miles north of
Bangor. The closure of the Old Rowland Tannery in 1971 left
the town without any industry to support local workers. The old
tannery, moreover, contributed to the economic pressures and
blight that discouraged investment. Along with economic
degradation, contamination at the site posed significant
environmental and human health risks, including runoff and
leaching into the Penobscot and Piscataquis Rivers. Recovery
Act grants from the Brownfields program, however, has helped
clean up the Rowland Tannery property and reduced the stigma
that has negatively impacted property values. Now that the site
is remediated, Rowland has turned it into a destination for river-
related recreation along the Penobscot and Piscataquis Rivers by
developing a walking path and a boat launch for the community.
With the assistance of Recovery Act funds under the
Brownfields program and matching funds from the Oregon
Business Development Department Coalition Cleanup, a
new food bank is under construction on a former
contaminated site in Grants Pass, Oregon. The county
received funding through the Oregon Community
Development Block Grant for construction, and with a
recently signed letter of completion following cleanup
work at the 250 acre former Sunnybrook Hop Farm, the
City of Grants Pass in Oregon is moving ahead quickly
with construction on the new food bank that will serve
numerous residents in the county. The food bank with
provide resources to help those in need while also
improving the environmental conditions of the community.
11
-------
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
Across the country, approximately 85,000 releases from underground storage tanks remain to
be cleaned up. Under the Recovery Act, EPA received $200 million from the Leaking
Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund for assessing and cleaning up releases of
contamination from federally-regulated underground storage tanks (USTs). The LUST
program helps create jobs and protect the environment and human health through:
emergency response and initial site hazard mitigation;
site investigations and assessments;
petroleum contamination release cleanups;
soil and groundwater monitoring;
enforcement actions and recovery of costs from liable tank owners and operators; and
public or community involvement activities.
EPA uses the money to assess and clean up contaminated LUST sites, which creates and
retains jobs and provides many economic and environmental benefits. EPA provided $190.7
million to state and territorial UST programs through cooperative agreements, all of which
were awarded by December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2012, 45 of the 54 states and territories
that received LUST Recovery Act money completed their work. EPA's regional UST
programs manage $6.3 million to clean up tank releases in Indian country. The remaining $3
million is used for federal management and oversight. To learn more about EPA's Office of
Underground Storage Tanks' implementation of the Recovery Act, visit
www. epa. gov/oust/eparecovery/index.htm.
Program Results as of June 30, 2011
In addition to the results below, Recovery Act funds have contributed to other assessment
and cleanup activities at a total of 4,037 sites, which did not begin as Recovery Act projects.
Number of Underground Storage Tank Site
Assessments Initiated and Completed
12
-------
2.400
2:000
1.600
X
i 1.200
Number of Underground Storage Tank Site
Cleanups Initiated and Completed
Beginning in late 2009, Indiana used Recovery Act funds to
determine the extent of soil and groundwater
contamination, excavate contamination, and monitor
contamination levels in the groundwater in the town of
West Lebanon. The site was originally developed in 1967
and used as a retail gasoline station, and in the late 1990s,
three underground storage tanks were removed. During that
excavation, three additional underground storage tanks and
contaminated soil were discovered. Initial sampling
indicated petroleum contamination in the groundwater, and
with the help of newly installed groundwater monitoring
wells, contamination is decreasing. The site is now being
utilized by the West Lebanon Volunteer Fire Department as
a parking lot.
The State of Alabama and Federal agencies are collaborating
with local communities to clean up and reuse brownfield
sites along the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail
that commemorates the historic 1965 Voting Rights March.
Over the years this 54-mile corridor has degraded and
exhibits high unemployment, environmental and health
issues, and lower educational and economic achievements.
However, Recovery Act funds have been used to assess
leaking underground storage tank sites along the corridor.
Local communities have recommended a variety of reuses
for these old abandoned properties, including local craft and
gift shops to support trail visitors, restaurants, and vegetable
stands. This effort has provided a boost to the local economy
and created jobs thanks to the efforts of Federal, state, and
local governments working together.
13
-------
Superfund
The overall objectives for using the $600 million provided to Superfund are to initiate and
accelerate cleanup at National Priority List (NPL) sites, maximize job creation and retention,
and provide environmental and economic benefits. Of the funds provided to EPA, $18
million was allocated for federal management and oversight. These objectives are being
achieved by starting new cleanup projects, accelerating cleanups at projects already
underway, increasing the number of workers and activities at cleanup projects, and returning
affected sites to more productive use.
The Recovery Act funds provide immediate short and longer-term health, environmental, and
economic benefits at both new and ongoing Superfund remedial projects through the
following:
treatment or removal of organic compound contamination;
treatment or removal of heavy metal contamination;
beginning or accelerating work to treat drinking water to meet standards;
provision of alternate residential drinking water supplies; and
mitigation of damage to wildlife habitat and ecosystems and beginning of restoration
The job sectors benefiting from the Superfund Recovery Act funds include, but are not
limited to: cleanup operation and management, laboratory sampling and analysis, hazardous
waste disposal and management, construction and monitoring equipment rental, water and
soil treatment, and environmental engineering and management. To learn more about
Superfund implementation of ARRA, visit www.epa.gov/superfund/eparecovery/index.html.
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
The Superfund program has allocated funding to 51 sites and 61 projects. Of these projects,
26 of them are on new sites across the country. For more information, visit:
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/eparecovery/sites.html.
Number of Superfund Projects Achieving
Completion
Q3
FY12
14
-------
Number of Superfund Sites Achieving
Construction Completion
/
* 9
Q4
FY11
Q3
FY12
In Nebraska, over 80 percent of the Recovery Act funds
have been expended on the lead Superfund site in Omaha.
The contractor has completed soil excavation at all
residential properties (1,300 in total) contaminated with
lead to be remediated during this phase. The work has
contributed to continuous reductions in elevated blood-
lead levels in children, removed the stigma of lead
contamination from these homes, and increased
community awareness of the health hazards from exposure
to lead. During construction periods, the contractor
employed over 75 local workers and made significant local
purchases, thereby strengthening the local economy.
In Baxter Springs and Treece, Kansas, remediation
work funded by Recovery Act for a Superfund site
has been completed with landscaping and grass
maintenance as the final step in the reuse of the
site. Mine waste excavation and disposal resulted
in over 2 million cubic yards and over 133 acres of
mining-impacted land returning to a useful and
aesthetic state. During construction, over 28 local
workers were employed, having a significantly
positive impact on the local economy.
15
-------
Inspector General
The Recovery Act provides the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) with $20 million
through December 31, 2012 for oversight and review. The OIG will assess whether EPA uses
the Recovery Act funds in accordance with its requirements and meets the accountability
objectives as defined by OMB. The OIG will utilize the funds to determine whether:
funds are awarded and distributed in a prompt, fair, and reasonable manner;
recipients and uses of funds are transparent to the public, and the public benefits of
these funds are reported clearly, accurately, and in a timely manner;
funds are used for authorized purposes and fraud, waste, error, and abuse are
mitigated;
projects funded under the Recovery Act avoid unnecessary delays and cost overruns;
program goals are achieved, including specific program outcomes and improved
results on broader economic indicators.
Program Results as of June 30, 2012
To ensure accountability the OIG has provided outreach and training to numerous groups and
has identified a number of actions for improvement. Additionally, the OIG identified over
$3.4 million in cost efficiencies/savings as funds to be put to better use.
dumber of Convictions,Indictments, Civil and Administrative Actions,
and Allegations Disproved from OIG Investigations
60
i-J
s <
E -s
*?
_= x
£ 'I
z .
1
Q3
FYI:
16
-------
Appendix: Recovery Act Performance Measures and Cumulative Results
Program
Clean Water
State
Revolving
Fund
Drinking
Water
State
Revolving
Fund
Performance Measures
Amount ($) of projects that are under
contract (non-tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have started
construction (non-tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed
construction (non-tribal)
States that have awarded all of their green
project reserve
Amount ($) of projects that have started
construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed
construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that are under
contract (non-tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have started
construction (non-tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed
construction (non-tribal)
States that have awarded all of their green
project reserve
Amount ($) of projects that have started
construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed
construction (tribal)
Q4
FY09
$.61 B
$.73 B
$.003 B
12
$9.23 M
$0.54 M
$.16B
$.20 B
$.01 B
8
$1.70 M
$.54 M
Q4
FY10
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$.20 B
51
$35.2 M
$3.0 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$.10 B
51
$23.3 M
$4.4 M
Q4
FY11
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$.78 B
51
$57 M
$12.7 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$.45 B
51
$29.4 M
$12.0 M
Qi
FY12
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$.96 B
51
$58.5 M
$23.1 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$.54 B
51
$29.9 M
$14.6 M
Q2
FY12
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$1.31 B
51
$58.5 M
$22.6 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$.68 B
51
$29.9 M
$14.6 M
Q3
FY12
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$1.5 B
51
$58.9 M
$22.4 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$.74 B
51
$30 M
$16.9 M
Target
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
51
$60 M
$60 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
51
$30 M
$30 M
Percent
Complete
100%
100%
39%
100%
98%
37%
100%
100%
41%
100%
100%
56%
17
-------
Program
Diesel
Emissions
Reductions
Brownfields
Performance Measures
Projects implemented that promote diesel
emissions reductions
Existing heavy duty diesel engines
(including school bus engines) that have
been retrofitted, replaced, or retired
Lifetime reductions of NOX emissions
(tons)
Lifetime reductions of PM emissions
(tons)
Lifetime reductions of HC emissions
(tons)
Lifetime reductions of CO emissions
(tons)
Lifetime reductions of CO2 emissions
(tons)
Brownfield assessments initiated
Brownfield assessments completed
Brownfields properties assessed
Brownfield cleanups initiated
Brownfield cleanups completed
Acres of Brownfields made ready for
reuse
Millions of dollars of cleanup and
redevelopment funds leveraged
Jobs leveraged from Brownfield's
activities
Percentage of participants trained
obtaining employment
Revolving Loan Fund loans/sub grants
Q4
FY09
160
415
1,402
53
109
553
11,083
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q4
FY10
160
12,934
42,149
1,588
4,800
5,675
351,332
499
398
322
19
13
30
$42 M
161
54%
12
Q4
FY11
160
24,700
81,100
3,100
9,300
11,000
672,400
1,004
881
637
61
36
548
$183 M
1,186
58%
41
Qi
FY12
160
26,650
85,700
3,450
10,220
11,570
718,900
1,133
988
693
82
45
637
$192.5 M
1,303
65%
58
Q2
FY12
160
27,250
86,600
3,495
10,455
11,665
719,800
1,255
1,080
757
98
54
785
$275 M
1,698
72%
75
Q3
FY12
160
27,300
89,500
3,550
10,500
12,150
742,200
1,289
1,148
802
116
61
929
$308 M
1,789
70
92
Target
160
30,000
100,000
4,000
12,000
13,000
850,000
500
500
500
30
30
500
$450 M
500
65%
45
Percent
Complete
100%
91%
90%
86%
88%
93%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
68%
100%
100%
100%
18
-------
Program
Leaking
Underground
Storage Tanks
Superfund
Inspector
General
Performance Measures
Site assessments initiated
Site assessments completed
Site cleanups initiated
Site cleanups completed
Projects in receipt of Recovery Act
funding
Sites in receipt of Recovery Act funding
Sites achieving construction completion
Sites achieving human exposures under
control
Sites with new construction
Projects with new construction
Projects achieving completion
Convictions, indictments, civil and
administrative actions, and allegations
disproved from OIG investigations
Awareness briefings, outreach briefings,
and training sessions held
Recovery Act complaints received
Whistleblower reprisal allegations
Return on the annual dollar investment as
a percentage of the OIG budget from
audits and investigations
Q4
FY09
180
34
57
9
60
50
1
2
25
25
0
2
63
13
0
0
Q4
FY10
780
642
709
592
61
51
4
4
26
26
1
26
128
52
0
0
Q4
FY11
1,319
1,660
1,659
1,617
61
51
9
5
26
26
19
41
163
71
0
52%
Qi
FY12
1,378
1,806
1,783
1,781
61
51
9
5
26
26
20
43
164
79
0
52%
Q2
FY12
1,468
2,074
2,022
2,060
61
51
9
5
26
26
21
52
172
87
0
128%
Q3
FY12
1,545
2,305
2,212
2,288
61
51
9
6
26
26
24
58
174
91
0
236%
Target
2,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
60
50
5
5
25
25
16
44
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Percent
Complete
77%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
19
------- |