,?*v
'' VS^/V ?
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Quarterly Performance Repoit
r\ \ U.S. Environmentiil Protection Agency
FY 2012 Quarter 4
Cumulative Results as of September 30,2012
Published October 31,2012
US EPA 190R12004
-------
Table of Contents
Background and Jobs Created 2
FY 2012 Quarter 4 Highlights 3
Clean Water State Revolving Fund 4
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund 6
Diesel Emissions Reductions 8
Brownfields
..10
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 12
Superfund 14
Inspector General 16
Appendix: Recovery Act Performance Measures and Results 17
Funding by Program
$4.500
$4.000
$3.500
$3.000
~t $2.500
a
I $2.000
$1,500
$1.000
$500
$-
$4.000
S300
S200
S100
Clean Water Drinking Water Superfund
SRF SRF
Diesel Underground Brownfields
Ems 5 ions Storage
Tanks
-------
Background
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) has been an unprecedented effort
to jumpstart our economy, create or save millions of jobs, and address long-neglected challenges
emerging in the 21st century. The Recovery Act includes $7.22 billion for programs
administered by EPA to protect and promote both green jobs and a healthier environment.
EPA began tracking program performance at the end of Fiscal Year 2009. The following report
provides a summary of the performance EPA and its partners have achieved through September
30, 2012 (Quarter 4, Fiscal Year 2012) in the six key environmental programs funded by the
Recovery Act and efforts by the Office of the Inspector General. Each section includes general
background information on the program, performance metrics, cumulative results and cumulative
long-term targets, and examples of progress. The environmental programs invest in clean water
and drinking water projects, implement diesel emission reduction technologies, clean up leaking
underground storage tanks, revitalize and reuse brownfields, and clean up Superfund sites. To
learn more about the Recovery Act implementation at EPA, visit www. epa. gov/recovery.
In order to ensure accountability and demonstrate progress toward meeting program goals, EPA
will provide quarterly performance updates consistent with the timing of quarterly recipient
reporting. While this report contains the cumulative results since the Recovery Act began, visit
www.epa.gov/recovery/plans.htmltfreports to review weekly financial and activity reports.
Jobs Report
The Recovery Act has created and retained jobs through its implementation over the past several
years. As the table below demonstrates 1,700 jobs have been funded by ARRA appropriations as
reported by recipients from July 1 to September 30, 2012. l To view EPA recipient reported data
for your state, visit EPA Recipient Reporting on www.recovery.gov.
Recipient Reported Jobs Created by EPA Recovery Act Funds
16,000
12.000
8:000
4.000
3,899
f une C 5 -
Sept. :;;
6.788
Oct. CS-
Dec.09
9.671
. -T1 1 o -
Mar. 10
16,603
Apr.lC-
JunelO
15.856
."ulv 1 C -
Sept. 10
10.629
Oct. 1C -
Dec. 1C
7J63
."m. 1 1 -
Mar. 11
7,170
Apr. 11-
Junell
4.699
W! || 1.894 || 1,700
."ulv 11- Oct. 11- Jan. 12- Apr. 12- Jul. 12-
Septll Dec. 11 Mar. 12 June 12 Sept. 12
Each quarter of jobs data represents a snap-shot in time of the number of jobs funded by Recovery Act for the particular quarter; the results
should not be added cumulatively. Note that the data represented in this chart is the responsibility of the recipients of EPA Recovery Act funds,
and while EPA does conduct a quality check of the data, the primary responsibility for jobs counts resides with the recipients. Also, a continuous
review period for each quarter lasts 75 days, which means the total draft reported jobs numbers presented could change after this report has been
finalized. In the reporting period (April-June 2012), a recipient error overstated the jobs impact for EPA-related awards. The reported number of
jobs in the chart is the accurate reported jobs number for the April-June 2012 reporting cycle.
-------
FY 2012 Quarter 4 Highlights
As of September 30, 2012
Clean Water State Revolving Fund
1,870 projects started construction and 1,287 projects completed
construction
93 Tribal projects started construction and 49 completed
construction
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
1,338 projects started construction and 861 projects completed
construction
64 Tribal projects started and 54 projects completed construction
Diesel Emissions Reductions
27,700 old diesel engines retrofitted, replaced, or retired
Reduced lifetime emissions of carbon dioxide
by over 753,000 tons and particulate matter by 3,500 tons
Brownfields
825 properties assessed with 67 properties cleaned up
201 properties totaling 963 acres are ready for reuse
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
1,651 site assessments initiated and 2,410 completed
2,260 cleanups initiated and 2,449 completed
51 of the 54 states and territories that received ARRA money
completed their work
Superfund
30 remedial action projects have expended 100% of their
obligated funds
96.5% of total remedial obligations have been expended
-------
Clean Water State Revolving Fund
The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), in place since 1987, provides funds to states
to capitalize state loan revolving funds that finance infrastructure improvements for public
wastewater systems and other water quality projects. The EPA provides direct grants to
Washington, DC and the territories for similar purposes.
The EPA received $4 billion for the CWSRF that includes funds for water quality management
planning grants with up to 1% reserved for federal management and oversight and 1.5% for
Tribes. EPA awarded grants to states and Puerto Rico for their state revolving fund programs,
from which assistance is provided to finance eligible high priority water infrastructure projects.
The states play a critical role by selecting projects, dispersing funds, and overseeing spending.
Projects were selected based on public health and environmental factors, and readiness to
proceed with construction capability. In addition, states were also required to provide at least
20% of their grants for green projects (i.e., green infrastructure, energy or water efficiency
improvements, and environmentally innovative activities). States had the option to retain up to
4% of available funds for program administration. Visit www.epa.gov/water/eparecovery to
learn more about the CWSRF.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
States certified that all project funding was under contract by the February 17, 2010 deadline and
at least 20% of their funds went to green projects. Collectively, states far surpassed the 20%
requirement, providing a national total of $1.13 billion, or 30% of all funds.
Amount of CWSRF Projects
Starting and Com pie dug Construction (non-tribal)
Target
Starting
Completing
-------
Amount of CAYSKF Projects
Starting and Com pled us Construction (tribal)
60-
!2 40
Despite significant wastewater needs, there are few financial
resources available to small, rural communities. The Lincoln County
Commission, in West Virginia, used a $718,626 Recovery Act loan,
all of which was provided in the form of principal forgiveness, to
fund the construction of on-site wastewater systems for 19 residences
in the community of Alkol, in the Left Fork watershed of the Mud
River. The systems use innovative peat filters that pre-treat septic
system effluent, removing high concentrations of nutrients and
producing high quality effluent with less biological oxygen demand,
fewer total suspended solids, and reduced fecal coliform bacteria.
These on-site systems replaced direct discharges from homes or
failing septic systems and reduced pollutants that were negatively
impacting surface and ground water in the watershed, helping to
protect the environment and public health.
The city of Lennox, in South Dakota used to treat wastewater through
aerated ponds. However, a change in beneficial use classifications for
Long Creek resulted in a revision of effluent limits beyond the level
the old facility. As a result, Lennox invested in the construction of
new technology which lowered ammonia in the wastewater stream to
acceptable levels. The system also utilizes ultraviolet disinfection of
effluent prior to discharge, which allowed Lennox to avoid the
increased costs and risks associated with chemical treatment options.
This up-front investment had lower life-cycle costs than other
alternative treatment technologies. Nevertheless, taking on a $4
million loan was a huge commitment for a community of only 2,843.
The Recovery Act made this investment affordable to Lennox with
more than $1.5 million in principal forgiveness and 30 year extended
financing terms. The project enabled Lennox to protect water quality
in Long Creek over the long term while also keeping sanitary sewer
rates affordable for the public.
-------
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
The Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended in 1996, established the Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund (DWSRF) to make funds available to drinking water systems to finance
infrastructure improvements. Under the Recovery Act, EPA received $2 billion for the DWSRF
with up to 1% of fund reserved for federal management and oversight and 1.5% for Tribes.
The program emphasizes the provision of funds to small and disadvantaged communities and to
programs that encourage pollution prevention as a tool for ensuring safe drinking water. The
DWSRF provides funds to states to establish state loan revolving funds that finance
infrastructure improvements for public and private Community Water Systems and not-for-profit
Non-Community Water Systems and direct grants to Washington, DC and the territories.
The DWSRF consists of 51 state financing programs (includes Puerto Rico) which comply with
federal statute and regulations. States must provide at least 20% of their grants for green projects
(i.e., green infrastructure, energy or water efficiency improvements, and environmentally
innovative activities) and may retain up to 4% of available funds for program administration. To
learn more about the DWSRF implementation of the Recovery Act, visit
www. epa. gov/water/eparecovery.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
Over a thousand projects have initiated construction that will bring safe drinking water to many
people across the country. Like the CWSRF, the states certified that all project funding was
under contract by the February 17, 2010 deadline and at least 20% of their funds went to green
projects. Many states surpassed the 20% minimum with the average amount of green reserve
totaling $500 million or 29% of all funds.
Amount of DAVSRF Projects
Starting and Com pie ting Construction (no n-tribal)
Target
Starting
Completing
-------
30 -
AmountofDWSKF Projects
Starting and Completing Construction (tribal)
Target
Starting
Completing
Q4
FYlfJ
Q4
FYll
Q4
FY12
The Central Shoshone County Water District used their
low-interest American Recovery Act loan to help correct a
long-standing problem with a local drinking water source.
The Enaville well near Kellogg, Idaho requires filtration
under the 1993 Surface Water Treatment Rule, and the loan
helped pay for the installation of a microfiltration plant to
treat drinking water and install residential meters.
Inadequate treatment of surface water that is used for
drinking water can lead to ingestion of harmful parasites,
such as cryptosporidium. Installation of filtration will
provide approximately 5,800 people with cleaner, safer
drinking water, and installation of metering will allow the
water system to become more sustainable.
The community of Whiteriver, Arizona, in the heart of the
Fort Apache Indian Reservation, has experienced
significant population growth over the past decade (61%).
The community's source of drinking water, the Miner Flat
well field, has had its production reduced by 40% in the
past few years while consumption has increased. To
ameliorate the situation, the EPA, Indian Health Service
(MS), Department of Housing and Urban Development,
and the White Mountain Apache Tribe have collaborated in
the planning, design, and construction of an innovative
surface diversion and treatment system that will be
completed this year.
-------
Diesel Emission Reductions
Diesel engines emit large amounts of air pollutants which contribute to serious public health
problems including asthma, lung cancer and various other cardiac and respiratory diseases. With
funds dispersed through four programs, regional, state and local governments, tribal agencies,
and non-profit organizations received approximately $300 million in grants and loans to support
the implementation of verified and certified diesel emission reduction technologies.
The program aims to accelerate emission reductions from older diesel engines to provide more
immediate air quality benefits and improve public health while using Recovery Act funds to
maximize job preservation and creation in order to promote economic recovery.
The Diesel Emission Reductions Act (DERA) awards grants, via the Recovery Act, through the
National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program, the State Clean Diesel Grant Program, the
Clean Diesel Emerging Technologies Funding Assistance Program, and the SmartWay Clean
Diesel Finance Program. Of the $300 million, $6 million has been reserved for federal
management and oversight. To learn more about the Diesel Emissions Reductions Program
implementation of the Recovery Act, visit www.epa.gov/otaq/eparecovery/index.htm.
Diesel Emissions Reductions Act (DERA)
Clean Diesel Funding Programs2
National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program
State Clean Diesel Grant Program3
Clean Diesel Emerging Technologies Funding Assistance Program
SmartWay Clean Diesel Finance Program
Total
Number of
ARRA Grants
90
51
14
5
160
Total Funds
($ Millions)
$156
$88
$20
$30
$294
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
30,000
Number of Existing Heavy Duty Diesel Engines
(Including School Buses) Retrofitted, Replaced, or Retired
As indicated in the program plans, projects should be completed for the National, State, and Emerging Technology Funding
Assistance programs by the end of December 2010. SmartWay projects have until the end of December 2012 to complete.
The State Clean Diesel Grant Program allocates grants to all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
-------
12.000
c
u
:_
r
X
=
^
9:000
6.000
3.000
Lifetime Reductions of Carbon Monoxide
(CO) Emissions
The San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
received grant funding to replace, repower, and retrofit
125 older school buses. With three major international
and interstate transportation corridors in San Diego
County, vehicular traffic has a big impact on air quality
in the area. Forty-one public schools in the county are
located within 1,500 feet of one of these major
highways. Using Recovery Act funding, San Diego
County cleaned up the dirtiest school buses in its fleet.
These upgrades will significantly reduce negative
impacts on human health as well as smog by reducing
emissions of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen
oxide (NOX).
Partnership played an important role in the success
of the Kentucky Clean Diesel Construction Project
to reduce diesel emissions throughout the state. The
Associated General Contractors of Kentucky
worked closely with its members to replace engines
on 36 pieces of equipment and add diesel particulate
filters (DPFs) to 18 pieces of equipment. Idle
reduction is also being promoted on 100
construction sites across Kentucky. The resulting
reduction in particulate matter (PM) is equivalent to
removing 110 long haul trucks from the road.
-------
Brownfields
A brownfield is a property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated
by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Under
the Recovery Act, EPA received $100 million for the Brownfields Program.
The funds provide awards for brownfields assessment, cleanup, new and supplemental
Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) and job training cooperative agreements through a competitive
process. Communities receive technical assistance and targeted brownfields assessments via
regional contracts and Interagency Agreements (IA). Activities to be performed under these
cooperative agreements include, but are not limited to:
assessments to identify the contaminants at properties and initiate cleanup planning;
direct cleanup of brownfield properties;
community involvement activities for property selection, cleanup and reuse planning; and
training of participants in the handling and removal of hazardous substances, including
training for environmental jobs (including, environmental sampling, analysis, and
remediation techniques).
EPA awarded $87.3 million to communities for assessments and cleanups of contaminated land
through cooperative agreements. An additional $9.2 million was distributed by EPA regional
offices for targeted brownfields assessments in communities with the remaining $3.5 million
used for federal management and oversight. To learn more about the Brownfields Program
implementation of the Recovery Act, visit www.epa.gov/brownfields/eparecovery/.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
Number of Broimfield Assessments
Initiated and Completed
1,400
1:200
1:000
| 800
| 600
400
200
Target
Initiated
Completed
10
-------
Number of Brownfield Cleanups
Initiated and Completed
140
120
100
Target
Initiated
Completed
A grand opening ceremony for the home of the new
Mattapan Community Health Center took place on
September 10, 2012. The Mattapan Community Health
Center, established in 1975, had outgrown its old
facility. The new building provides state of the art medical
services to this underserved community and also contains
the first pharmacy in Mattapan Square in 30 years. A
Recovery Act grant helped remediate the parcels in
preparation for the new construction. The project created
600 jobs in construction and operation of the new health
center. The new health center will provide for clinical,
dental and laboratory services for its patients and will
double the number of residents it can serve.
Utilizing a Brownfields Recovery Act grant, the city of
Vista, California collaborated with the state's environmental
regulatory agency, California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) to achieve the ultimate goal of
the Brownfields program - make properties available for
redevelopment quickly and efficiently to allow cities to
implement their redevelopment plans. The city and DTSC
developed and implemented a carefully considered
Supplemental Site Investigation. The city was able to obtain
DTSC's concurrence that the chemicals of concern did not
present an unacceptable risk to human health or the
environment and no further action was issued. This strategy
saved the city up to 500 thousand dollars. This project is an
excellent example of how EPA's Brownfields program can
result in significant savings to cities and provide
opportunities for expedited redevelopment.
11
-------
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
Across the country, approximately 85,000 releases from underground storage tanks remain to be
cleaned up. Under the Recovery Act, EPA received $200 million from the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund for assessing and cleaning up releases of contamination from
federally-regulated underground storage tanks (USTs). The LUST program helps create jobs and
protect the environment and human health through:
emergency response and initial site hazard mitigation;
site investigations and assessments;
petroleum contamination release cleanups;
soil and groundwater monitoring;
enforcement actions and recovery of costs from liable tank owners and operators; and
public or community involvement activities.
EPA uses the money to assess and clean up contaminated LUST sites, which creates and retains
jobs and provides many economic and environmental benefits. EPA provided $190.7 million to
state and territorial UST programs through cooperative agreements, all of which were awarded
by December 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2012, 51 of the 54 states and territories that
received LUST Recovery Act money completed their work. EPA's regional UST programs
manage $6.3 million to clean up tank releases in Indian country. The remaining $3 million is
used for federal management and oversight. To learn more about EPA's Office of Underground
Storage Tanks' implementation of the Recovery Act, visit
www. epa. gov/oust/eparecovery/index.htm.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
In addition to the results below, Recovery Act funds have contributed to other assessment and
cleanup activities at a total of 4,031 sites, which did not begin as Recovery Act projects.
Number of L DC!erground Storage Tank Site
Assessments Initiated and Completed
Target
Initiated
Completed
Q4
FY12
12
-------
Number of Underground Storage Tank Site
Cleanups Initiated aiid Completed
2.449
Target
Initiated
Completed
Q4
FY12
In 1949, Dutch's Tackle and Marina established operations
on the Clam River where it enters Torch Lake on Michigan's
northwest Lower Peninsula. In 1965, the marina installed
gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs), which in 1989
contaminated two neighborhood residential drinking wells
with gasoline. In 2010, Michigan used Recovery Act funds to
implement a plan, which included protecting the on-site
building and providing excavation support in order to remove
contamination; treating and discharging over 13 million
gallons of groundwater; removing highly-contaminated
source soil; and removing and disposing of almost 11,000
cubic yards of contaminated soil. As a result, the Clam River
and Torch Lake, both sensitive environmental areas, are
protected. Because residents and businesses in the area use
the drinking water aquifer, this work is protecting the
public's health, safety, and welfare.
The Fisherville Mill is located between the Blackstone River, which
is an American Heritage River, and the historic Blackstone Canal in
Grafton, Massachusetts. Intermittently from 1831 to 1986, the mill
manufactured textiles, tool and die parts, machine tool stamps, lawn
furniture, foam rubber, and fabrics for car seats. In 1987,
contamination from a diesel fuel underground storage tank, along
with heavier oils already in the ground, migrated to the Blackstone
Canal. Beginning in 2009, Massachusetts used Recovery Act funds
to install a containment structure, which limited oil infiltration into
the canal; excavate and dispose of oil-contaminated sediments and
debris; and re-grade and stabilize parts of the canal bank disturbed
when excavating canal sediment. The Fisherville Mill is part of a
streetscape project, which is restoring parts of South Grafton while
embracing its history as an industrial region.
13
-------
Superfund
The overall objectives for using the $600 million provided to Superfund are to initiate and
accelerate cleanup at National Priority List (NPL) sites, maximize job creation and retention, and
provide environmental and economic benefits. Of the funds provided to EPA, $18 million was
allocated for federal management and oversight. These objectives are being achieved by starting
new cleanup projects, accelerating cleanups at projects already underway, increasing the number
of workers and activities at cleanup projects, and returning affected sites to more productive use.
The Recovery Act funds provide immediate short and longer-term health, environmental, and
economic benefits at both new and ongoing Superfund remedial projects through the following:
treatment or removal of organic compound contamination;
treatment or removal of heavy metal contamination;
beginning or accelerating work to treat drinking water to meet standards;
provision of alternate residential drinking water supplies; and
mitigation of damage to wildlife habitat and ecosystems and beginning of restoration
The job sectors benefiting from the Superfund Recovery Act funds include, but are not limited
to: cleanup operation and management, laboratory sampling and analysis, hazardous waste
disposal and management, construction and monitoring equipment rental, water and soil
treatment, and environmental engineering and management. To learn more about Superfund
implementation of ARRA, visit www.epa.gov/superfund/eparecovery/index.html.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
The Superfund program has allocated funding to 51 sites and 61 projects. Of these projects, 26 of
them are on new sites across the country. For more information, visit:
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/eparecovery/sites.html.
Number of Superfund Projects Achieving
Completion
Q4
FY10
Q4
FY11
Q4
FY12
14
-------
Number of Superfund Sites Achieving
Human Exposure Under Control
Q4
FY10
Q4
FY11
Q4
FY12
Changes to the cleanup remedy for the Silresim Chemical
site in Lowell, Massachusetts called for replacing the
existing interim cap with a Final Cap, and implementing
a thermally-enhanced soil vapor extraction (SVE)
technology referred to as Electrical Resistive Heating
(ERH). With the help of Recovery Act funds, EPA was
able to complete construction on both remedy
modifications. Groundwater sampling continued with the
final round in August 2012. The ERH system removed
soil vapor contaminants in the range of 40,000 to 80,000
pounds, including 3,480 pounds of pure waste product.
Recovery Act funding for the Atlantic Wood
Industries site in Portsmouth, Virginia has
allowed the cleanup to start one year earlier than
originally planned. EPA has spent over $3
million of the $3.7 million in Recovery Act
funds that were allocated for cleanup activities.
The EPA used funds to excavate contaminated
soils, build part of a landfill berm, and build
another berm along the banks of the Southern
Branch of the Elizabeth River that will help
contain dredged sediments.
15
-------
Inspector General
The Recovery Act provides the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) with $20 million through
December 31, 2012 for oversight and review. The OIG will assess whether EPA uses the
Recovery Act funds in accordance with its requirements and meets the accountability obj ectives
as defined by OMB. The OIG will utilize the funds to determine whether:
funds are awarded and distributed in a prompt, fair, and reasonable manner;
recipients and uses of funds are transparent to the public, and the public benefits of these
funds are reported clearly, accurately, and in a timely manner;
funds are used for authorized purposes and fraud, waste, error, and abuse are mitigated;
projects funded under the Recovery Act avoid unnecessary delays and cost overruns;
program goals are achieved, including specific program outcomes and improved results
on broader economic indicators.
Program Results as of September 30, 2012
To ensure accountability the OIG has provided outreach and training to numerous groups and has
identified a number of actions for improvement. Additionally, the OIG identified over $3.4
million in cost efficiencies/savings as funds to be put to better use.
Return on the annual dollar investment as a percentage of the OIG
budget from audits and investigations
200
100
152
o 4
Q4
FYOP
/
SZS.j miHion in
cumulative
Q4
FY10
FY11
Q4
FY12
16
-------
Appendix: Recovery Act Performance Measures and Cumulative Results
Program
Clean Water
State
Revolving
Fund
Drinking
Water
State
Revolving
Fund
Diesel
Emissions
Reductions
Performance Measures
Amount ($) of projects that are under contract (non -tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have started construction (non -tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed construction (non-
tribal)
States that have awarded all of their green project reserve
Amount ($) of projects that have started construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that are under contract (non -tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have started construction (non -tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed construction (non-
tribal)
States that have awarded all of their green project reserve
Amount ($) of projects that have started construction (tribal)
Amount ($) of projects that have completed construction (tribal)
Projects implemented that promote diesel emissions reductions
Existing heavy duty diesel engines (including school bus engines)
that have been retrofitted, replaced, or retired
Lifetime reductions of NOX emissions (tons)
Lifetime reductions of PM emissions (tons)
Lifetime reductions of HC emissions (tons)
Lifetime reductions of CO emissions (tons)
Lifetime reductions of CO2 emissions (tons)
Q4
FY09
$.61 B
$.73 B
$.003 B
12
$9M
$.54 M
$.16 B
$.20 B
$.01 B
8
$1.7 M
$.54 M
160
415
1,402
53
109
553
11,083
Q4
FY10
$3.8B
$3.8B
$.20 B
51
$35 M
$3.0 M
$1.8B
$1.8B
$.10B
51
$23 M
$4.4 M
160
12,934
42,149
1,588
4,800
5,675
351,332
Q4
FY11
$3.8B
$3.8B
$.78 B
51
$57 M
$13 M
$1.8B
$1.8B
$.45 B
51
$29 M
$12 M
160
24,700
81,100
3,100
9,300
11,000
672,400
Q4
FY12
$3.8B
$3.8B
$1.6B
51
$59 M
$26 M
$1.8B
$1.8B
$.81 B
51
$30 M
$22 M
160
27,700
91,000
3,500
10,600
12,300
753,000
Target
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
$3.8 B
51
$60 M
$60 M
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
$1.8 B
51
$30 M
$30 M
160
30,000
100,000
4,000
12,000
13,000
850,000
17
-------
Program
Brownfields
Leaking
Underground
Storage Tanks
Superfund
Inspector
General
Performance Measures
Brownfield assessments initiated
Brownfield assessments completed
Brownfields properties assessed
Brownfield cleanups initiated
Brownfield cleanups completed
Acres of Brownfields made ready for reuse
Millions of dollars of cleanup and redevelopment funds leveraged
Jobs leveraged from Brownfield's activities
Percentage of participants trained obtaining employment
Revolving Loan Fund loans/sub grants
Site assessments initiated
Site assessments completed
Site cleanups initiated
Site cleanups completed
Projects in receipt of Recovery Act funding
Sites in receipt of Recovery Act funding
Sites achieving construction completion
Sites achieving human exposures under control
Sites with new construction
Projects with new construction
Projects achieving completion
Convictions, indictments, civil and administrative actions, and
allegations disproved from OIG investigations
Awareness briefings, outreach briefings, and training sessions held
Recovery Act complaints received
Whistleblower reprisal allegations
Return on the annual dollar investment as a percentage of the OIG
budget from audits and investigations
Q4
FY09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
180
34
57
9
60
50
1
2
25
25
0
2
63
13
0
0
Q4
FY10
499
398
322
19
13
30
$42 M
161
54%
12
780
642
709
592
61
51
4
4
26
26
1
26
128
52
0
0
Q4
FY11
1,004
881
637
61
36
548
$183 M
1,186
58%
41
1,319
1,660
1,659
1,617
61
51
9
5
26
26
19
41
163
71
0
52%
Q4
FY12
1,324
1,190
825
125
67
963
$309 M
1,791
70%
99
1,651
2,410
2,260
2,449
61
51
11
10
26
26
33
70
175
91
0
152%
Target
500
500
500
30
30
500
$450 M
500
65%
45
2,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
60
50
5
5
25
25
16
44
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18
------- |