United States
       Environmental Protection
       Agency
Region V
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
August 1979
SEFft  ENVIRONMENT
             ERIE:
                  A New U.S. Source
                  of Natural Gas?
                     (Story on page 12)

-------
           A one-of-a-kind musical comedy program that looks at environment, energy growth, and de-
         velopment is playing cities and towns throughout the Ohio River Valley this summer.
           "Live! On the River," produced by the Cincinnati Institute, with assistance from the 'Mead
         Johnson Foundation and EPA, will play over 70 performances in 35 river valley communities this
         summer, according to Project Director Bob Robbins.
           "We want to talk to the people 	17
  People	;:'.;.':.... 20
  Construction Grants	M. .! ! . 21
  Federal Register	          22
  EIS,NOVs	v .A.!.. 23
  Calendar	".'	24
                               i        i
Val Adamkus	;	Deputy Regional Administrator
Frank Corrado	} ,-.	 , ..Public Affairs Djrector
R. John Rapsys	,. Editor
Leah Wilson	Graphic Designer
                                                                                           EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
 A   Slick   Solution
 For   Used   Motor  Oil
by Marjorie Borchard
   Used  motor  oil—that  dirty, slimy
 black stuff you drain out of your car's
 crankcase. What do you do with it?
   Many  States  are  hoping  you'll
 recycle your used motor oil. Currently,
 18 States  have  used-oil  recycling
 programs, although the programs vary
 somewhat from State to State. While
 some States have legislation regarding
 the recycling of oil,  others  conduct
 their programs  on  a  voluntary basis.
 Some States have  one or two oil re-
 refiners  or reprocessers; others have
 haulers  who  sell the oil  without re-
 refining it.
   But the important point is that used
 motor oil can  be  recycled,  virtually
 forever. As  the Association  of
 Petroleum Refiners says, "Lubricating
 oil never wears out—it just gets dirty!"
 Not only does recycling motor oil keep
 it out of the ground and water, but it
 also  reuses a valuable resource. With
 rising prices and current shortages of
 oil, it makes sense to recycle all the oil
 we can.
   Just how  much oil is out there,
 available  for  recycling? According to
 the  American  Petroleum   Institute
 (API), about 190 million gallons of oil is
 generated  each  year  by  do-it-
 yourselfers who change their own
 motor oil. While some of this oil  is
 recycled—either through re-refining or
 through  use as  a  fuel or lubricant-
 most of it is dumped in sewers, in
 drivew"ays, in trash cans, or even in the
 neighbor's backyard.  Each year,  as
 more  and more  people decide  to
 change  their own  motor  oil,  this
 amount of used, potentially recyclable
 oil will increase.
   Re-refined oil can be just as good as
 new oil,  and even the API agrees. In
 Germany, where a  government sub-
 sidized oil recycling'program recovers
 70 percent of the used motor oil, each
 new  Mercedes-Benz contains re-
 refined oil. In Minnesota,  the State's
 only re-refiner has used the stuff in his
 Lincoln  Continental for  years and
 swears by it.
   Minnesota law requires all  retailers
EM/AUGUST 1979
State law and a public
education program team
in Minnesota to
give old oil new life
up
who sell motor oil to either provide a
collection, tank for the  deposit  and
collection of used oil, or to post a
notice indicating the- nearest oil collec-
tion site.
  Although there  is no exact count on
the number of used-oil collection sites
in Minnesota, they can  generally be
found at most service stations  that
change oil, at discount stores, at su-
burban shopping  malls, and at multi-
material recycling centers.  There  are
also a number of State and city gov-
ernment garages  that provide oil col-
lection sites for the public.
  The used oil is then picked up by the
State's 15 private oil haulers for fuel or
lubricating purposes.  In Minnesota, a
large portion of the collected oil is used
to lubricate railroad or farm machinery.
Although little oil  is re-refined  for sale
to motorists in Minnesota, this is a
growing trend in many other States.
  The  Minnesota Pollution  Control
Agency  (MFCA)   has promoted  an
education program to encourage the
public to recycle their used oil. Recen-
tly, the MPCA used TV news coverage
and newspaper articles to pubicize the
program, which resulted in over 200
telephone calls  from citizens  with
questions about  oil  collection sites.
Many people said they were  glad to
hear about the program, as they had
been saving  their old oil and didn't
know what to do with it.
  Besides Minnesota, two other EPA
Region V States—Illinois and Michigan
— have statewide motor oil recycling
programs. A fourth, Indiana, plans to
begin such a  program this month. Ohio
and Wisconsin do not  have State-
sponsored  recycling  programs,
although some private recycling does
occur there.
  For more  information on used oil
recycling, please contact Marjorie Bor-
chard,  Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, (612) 296-7294.  &
Marjorie Borchard is a Public  In-
formation Officer  with the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.

-------
 getting hazardous
 wastes in hand
                                    Minnesota  Regulates
   After three years of  study,  public
 hearings, and considerable input from
 industry  and environmental groups,
 Minnesota's comprehensive hazardous
 waste regulations came into effect  pn
 June 16.
   Thus Minnesota has joined about a
 dozen other States with regulations on
 the books that come to grips with the
 management of hazardous wastes —
 ranging from oil and  paint wastes to
 cyanide and poly chlorinated biphenyls
 (PCBs).
   Minnesota's    regulations   are
 designed to monitor and control hazar-
 dous  wastes  by  giving  complete
 "cradle to grave" responsibility to the
 generators of such wastes, subject to
 review  by the  Minnesota Pollution
 Control Agency (MPCA). This means
 that it is up to the waste generator to
 ensure that its wastes are transported,
 stored.and ultimately delivered  to a
 permitted  processisng   or  disposal
 facility.
   One of the key provisions of the new
 regulations is the requirement that in-
 dustries submit detailed disclousure
 forms describing all hazardous wastes
 they generate. This information is vital
to MPCA  for the  development  of  a
 long-term    hazardous    waste
 management plan for the State.
  "Until  now, there has  been no
uniform, in-depth method to gather in-
formation on exactly how much and
what type of hazardous wastes exist in
Minnesota,"    said   Marjorie  Bor-
chard, Public Information Officer with
MPCA. "All we knew is that in Min-
nesota, as elsewhere in the country,
chemicals were being dumped illegally,
causing  pollution  of the  surrounding
land, water, and air," she said.
  Once  hazardous  wastes  are iden-
tified, proper containers and labelings
must be used, according  to the new
regulations. Each  container of waste
requires shipping papers to accompany
it from the location where the waste is
generated, through the  shipping
process, and then to the waste's final
disposal point. Shipping papers also in-
clude instructions  on what to do in
case of a spill.
  "Each  year, Minnesota  industries
produce an estimated 128,000 tons of
hazardous wastes," said  Borchard.
"Some of these dangerous materials
are properly disposed of, but MPCA is
unable to determine where 57 percent
of these wastes end up. It can be safely
assumed that each year thousands of
tons are illegally dumped  into sewers,
lakes, rivers, and into the ground."
  The  new   Minnesota  regulations
                \
 require industries to dispose of their
 hazardous  wastes  at  a  permitted
 facility. "Aside from a few private in-
 dustry sites, there are currently no per-
 mitted hazardous waste disposal  or
 processing sites in  the  State. Those
 that, exist are owned by a few oil re-
 refiners. Plus, there  are two large on-
 site facilities: one owned and used ex-
 clusively by the 3M Company, and the
 other by the  Federal Cartridge Com-
 pany," Bochard said. Nearly 16 percent
 of Minnesota's  hazardous wastes  is
 shipped  to  other States, such as  Il-
 linois, she said.
  The regulations create an incentive
 for private  industry to develop  safe,
 permitted     hazardous    waste
 management sites, MPCA said. In ad-
 dition, they are also expected to cause
 a  reduction   in  hazardous waste
 generation.
  "Since the  new regulations require
 industry to bear long-term liability for
 improper disposal,  it .will eventually
 become more economical to find ways
 to reduce or recycle hazardous wastes
 whenever possible," Borchard said.
  The MPCA staff has planned a series
 of workshops and meetings with in-
dustry representatives,  to launch  a
 cooperative effort of managing the
State's hazardous wastes. MPCA will
                EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
 "Each  year,  Minnesota industries produce
 an estimated  128,000 tons of hazardous
 waste...each year  thousands  of  tons  are
 illegally dumped into sewers, lakes, rivers,
 and into the ground."
                      "Cradle to Grave" Concept Introduced
Hazardous
work with  industries to gather in-
formation  needed  to properly plan
for the treatment, recycling or disposal
of these wastes, and to assess training
needs for hazardous waste handlers
and transporters.
  States which do not develop  hazar-
dous  waste regulations  that are at
least as stringent as upcoming Federal
rules.will have their hazardous wastes
managed directly by EPA.1
  The proposed EPA regulations will
govern wastes that are determined to
be either corrosive, carcinogenic, flam-
mable, explosive or otherwise harmful
to human health or to the environment.
A by-product of many manufacturing
processes, hazardous wastes are cre-
ated by the production of such diverse
items as telephones, TV  sets, books,
automobiles, newspapers, clothes, and
processed foods.
  EPA  has  been  providing  grant
support and technical assistance for
several years to help MPCA in the
development of these new regulations.
f%
* Information for this  article was
provided by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA).
Open-air dumps containing hazardous wastes, such as at PCI in Shakopee, near Minneapolis (above),
and at Arrowhead Refining in Duluth (below), present a danger to health and the enviroment. They
are constant eyesores as well.
 EM/AUGUST 1979


-------
New Technique  "Fingerprints"  Air  Particles
  What fingerprinting  of  people  has
done  for  crime  detection, •"finger-
printing" of air particles now promises
to do  the same for pinpointing  the
often elusive sources of air pollution.
  A new technique, known as Sus-
pended Particle Evaluation and Class-
ification (SPEC), identifies the  indi-
vidual air particle and — more impor-
tant — tells where that particle came
from:   an  electric  generating  plant,
quarry, steel mill, or any other source.
  "The bottom line is effective control
of air  pollution," said Edward Fasiska,
president of Material  Consultants El-
Laboratories (MCL).  "But  first comes
source identification  — we must know
where all. that pollution  is  coming
frrom."
  Fasiska founded  MCL in Monroe-
ville, Pa., nine years ago and personally
conceived the idea of "fingerprinting"
air particles. But to turn the idea  into
an effective technique, he needed help.
Luckily, help was readily  available at
the U.S. Steel Research  Laboratory
nearby. He teamed up with Dr. Richard
Lee of U.S. Steel to  develop the tech-
nology that evolved into SPEC.
  Fasiska, who has a Ph.D. in crystallo-
graphy, went to the Allegheny County
Bureau of Air Control about a year ago
and applied  the  SPEC technique for
the first time. In that study he found to
his surprise  that air pollution in Al-
legheny County  came mostly from
dust  particles  rather  than  industrial
sources, as he first suspected.
  All  told,  Fasiska  completed  about
100  environmental  studies,  helping
small businesses in the Pittsburgh area,
6
including helping  the City  of Pitts-
burgh with  the State Implementation
Plan for clean air. It has been presumed
that most air  pollution  comes from
industry sources,  said  Fasiska.  But,
as his SPEC technique demonstrated,
Fasiska found that only about half of
the total air pollution  came from local
industry.  The other  half came from
such non-point sources as road dust
or agricultural soil particles.
  The  SPEC  "fingerprinting" tech-
nique consists of identifying thousands
of  air  particles,  one by one. Size,
shape,  chemical, and  other character-
istics are then stored into computers
for  ready reference. Two types of air
samples are  collected on filter media,
or thin  sheets of film:  one comes frdm
the surrounding air of  a region,  the
other from  a suspected source  of
pollution. By matching the character-
istics of the two  samples,  scientists
can tell what pollutants  are in the air,
where they come from, and how much
pollution  comes from the suspected
source.
  To  identify  the  air  particles,  the
SPEC  technique  uses  a  scanning
electron microscope,  an  X-ray fluore-
scent chemical analyzer and an X-ray
defractor, plus two computers. With
these tools,  scientists   are   able  to
identify, or "fingerprint," air  particles,
even those invisible to  the naked eye.
  Robert K.  Stevens,  chief  of  the
inorganic pollutant  analysis  branch
at EPA's laboratory in  Research  Tri-
angle Park, N.C., said:  "EPA's major
thrust is toward quantitative analysis
 - to identify as many sources of pol-
                                                                                         R. John Rapsys
 lution as possible. In. that respect, the
 SPEC technique certainly helps.
  "With SPEC," he said, "we are not
jumping off into the dark when we say
that in a certain area 10 to 20 percent
of air pollution  comes from  auto ex-
haust,  10 to 40 percent from com-
bustion of fossil fuels  (coal,  oil), and
the balance from  a combination  of
industrial,  agricultural, and natural
sources, .such as windblown dust."
But he added,  "No single technique
can be expected to do all things; there
has to be a combination of analytical
methods."  There  must  also  be  a
change in the sampling method,  he
said. "We must have  a lot  more  air
samples to look at."
  Up to now, EPA has been using the
bulk analysis technique for identifying
pollutants in the air.' However, this
technique needs to be modified, Ste-
vens said, so that an air sample may be
collected and analyzed directly by the
scanning electron  microscope and
other  instruments right on the filter.
This is different from the SPEC tech-
nique,  which requires the transfer of
the air sample from one filter to an-
other, Stevens explained.
  The idea, he said, is to use  both the
SPEC technique and the bulk analysis
technique, so that they could  comple-
ment each other.
  Fasiska's  laboratory  (MCL)  pre-
sented the new SPEC technique at an
EPA seminar earlier' this  year. "The
unique thing about SPEC is  that it's
an  automated procedure capable  of
analyzing hundreds of  air   samples
instead of the usual two or three,"
                 EM/AUGUST 1979


-------
Source identification  is the  key
 said  Stevens. The laboratory is not
 under EPA contract  now, but  MCL
 hopes to get one within the next year
 or so.
   Besides having  been used in the
 Pittsburgh area, the SPEC technique
 is scheduled to analyze air pollution
 around Philadelphia, Denver,  Huston,
 and Champaign,  III. Here,  too,  dich-
 otomous (two-part) samples will  be
 taken: one from the general  air, one
 from a suspected pollution source.
   "Once we receive the air samples,
 we'll be  able to identify  sources of
 urban and  nonurban  pollution  right
 here in North Carolina, without actually
 going to the areas concerned," said
 Stevens.
   Initially, all air samples will come to
 Research Triangle Park in North Carol-
 ina. They will then be sent to Fasiska's
 laboratory or similar ones for  sub-
 sequent analysis, Stevens said.
   "By 1980-81,  we will probably  be
 analyzing air samples from urban areas
 all across the country," he said. "By
 then, it  should  be possible to trace
 many — if not all — sources of pollu-
 tion, especially those particulates that
 stay suspended  in  the air for  many
 hours."
   The SPEC technique promises  to
 benefit the industry as well, said Fasis-
 ka. Industry has spent money on pollu-
 tion controls that  have not always
 worked perfectly, but with information
 from SPEC, companies will now  be
 able to allocate their pollution controj
 funds much more effectively, he saidsv
EM/August 79
                                                                                        Peter Busech-Gary Aden/Arizona Stats
                           EPA Photos
 Moonlike surface (top) is actually
 a greatly enlarged coarse  air
 particle fraction. Each air particle
 has a  unique composition  that
 helps  identify  its source.  Three
 automated and one  manual dich-
 otomous samplers (above) were
 used by EPA to study sources
 of air  pollution  in  the  Smoky
 Mountains.  EPA  scientist  Roben
 K. Stevens  (left) with  an X-ray
 fluorescence instrument used to
 analyze air particles.   	
 R. John Rapsys is a writer with
EPA Region V  and editor of
Environment Midwest.
Cartoon: Bob Nagel

-------
Monitoring  Air  Pollution
 PSI  aims  at  a  common  denominator
      •••  •"•*&
By Kent Kozina

  Henry Hartmann recently had open
heart surgery. His doctor told him that
from  now on, ozone is one of his big-
gest enemies, and that he should avoid
it whenever possible. Hartmann'swife~
has respiratory problems which be-
come aggravated whenever ozone  le-
vels are high.
  The Hartmanns live about 10 miles
north of a major Midwestern city, in  an
area frequently recording ozone levels
twice the national health standard. The
hartmanns want the most up-to-date
information  they can  find on ozone
levels in their community.
  The city reports ozone levels hourly
 by means  of  a recorded message,
which gives the latest measured con-
centrations of ozone in parts per billion
parts of air;  it also gives the level of  the
mann first  listened to the message,
however, it left him confused.

  "I found the report very interesting,"
 Hartmann  said, "but  I  didn't know
what all  of  it meant. If  the reporter
 levels are half the standard, for  ex-
 ample, should I just take it easy when
 I go  outside, or should I jump in  the
 car and get out of town?"
  Hartmann is  one  of milions  of
Americans  suffering   from car-
diovascular disease. His wife is one of
an estimated 10 million Americans with
  8
asthma,  chronic  bronchitis,  or  em-
physema. These people are especially
susceptible to  the  five  major  air
pollutants: sulfur dioxide,  suspended
particulates (dust), nitrogen  dioxide,
carbon  monoxide, and ozone. They
can perhaps benefit  most from ac-
curate and understandable air quality
information.
  Many air pollution monitoring agen-
cies use an air reporting system which
distills the technical measurements for
several of the pollutants into a single
number, or index. The index  number
corresponds to a general description of
the  air quality for that day, such as
"good", "fair", or "poor."
  This has the  benefit of interpreting
pollution measurements for those, like
Hartmann, who don't yet understand
how various levels of pollution can af-
fect their health.
  In 1975,  the  Council  on  En-
vironmental  Quality (CEQ) and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)  surveyed  the  55  largest  air
pollution control agencies in the U.S.
and Canada. Thirty-three of those
agencies reported air quality levels
with some form of index — but no two
were exactly alike.
  An index number of 100, for exam-
ple, could mean anything  from "un-
satisfactory" air quality in  Minneapo-
lis, Minnesota, to '''severe air pollution"
in Phoenix, Arizona, depending upon
the index calculation method and the
pollutants  reported. In  all  the joint
CEQ/EPA  survey  found 44 different
descriptive words  and 14 different in-
dex calculation methods in use nation-
wide.
consistencies among the different re-
porting methods,  the survey recom-
mended a standardized air pollution re-
porting method which would meaning-
fully relate urban air pollution levels to
the public health.
  Based  on that recommendation,
EPA announced this spring new rules
for such a standardized nationwide
reporting  system,  known as  the
Pollutant Standards Index (PSI).
  According  to   the  new  rules,
authorized by Section 319 of the 1977
Clean Air Act 'Amendments, the PSI
must  be used in all urban areas with
more than 500,000 population by 1981;
areas  with more than  200,000
population must use the PSI by 1983.
  The PSI works basically  like this:
Each daily measured concentration of
each of the five major air pollutants is
divided  by the  short-term national
health  standard  for that  pollutant,
yielding an  index  value  for  each
pollutant. The PS| is th^en reported as
the maximum of these values.

  Local   newpapers,  radio,  and

                EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
INDEX
VALUE


1
inn,,



n
AIR QUALITY
EPISODE LEVEL
^-SIGNIFICANT-

VA/ARNINH

MATION Al
HEALTH
STANDARDS
. 50% OF
HEALTH
STANDARDS
OZONE
LEVELS
(1 -hour),
ppm
T




nr
— O 	
HEALTH
EFFECT
DESCRIPTOR

H A7ARDni IQ
\
VERY
UNHEALTHFUL
UNHEALTHFUL
MODERATE
GOOD
GENERAL HEALTH EFFECTS

Premature death of ill and
elderly. Healthy people will
experience adverse symptoms
that affect their normal activity.
Premature onset of certain
diseases in addition to significant
aggravation of symptoms and
decreased exercise tolerance in
healthy persons.
Significant aggravations of
symptoms and decreased
exercise tolerance in persons
with heart or lung disease, with
widespread symptoms in the
healthy population.
Mild aggravation of symptoms in
susceptible persons, with
irritation symptoms in the healthy
population.

P
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

All persons should remain
indoors, keeping windows and
doors closed All persons should
minimize physical exertion and
avoid traffic.
Elderly and persons with existing
diseases should stay indoors and
avoid physical exertion. General
population should avoid outdoor
activity.
Elderly and persons with existing
heart or lung disease should stay
indoors and reduce physical
activity.
Persons with existing heart or
respiratory ailments should
reduce physical exertion and
outdoor activity.

:>m - parts per million
           COMPARISON OF PSI VALUES WITH OZONE CONCENTRATIONS DESCRIPTOR WORDS
                     GENERALIZED HEALTH EFFECTS, AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
television  stations  pick  up  this air
quality  information  and include  it in
their   weather  reports.   Some  air
jpollution agencies, like the one in Chic-
ago, report  more frequently via taped
phohe messages.
  At at minimum, the PSI report in-
cludes the geographic area monitored,
the pollutant with  the highest mea-
sured  concentration within the  pre-
vious reporting period, the PSI number
(from 1 to 500), and  a description of air
quality which  corresponds to the PSI
number. When npore than one of the
five major pollutants violates the na-
tional  health standards,  each pollu-
tant is reported.
  A typical  report might contain the
following    statement: "Today's air
quality index is 120,  which is regarded
as  unhealthful. The  responsible
pollutant is  ozone.  This report repre-
sents conditions prevailing over most
of the suburban north side area for the
previous 24-hour period  ending at
noon today." If the index were forecast
for  the next day, the following ad-
ditional language might also be used:
"The current forecast is for improved
EM/AUGUST 1979
air quality tomorrow with the index not
expected to exceed 80."
  According to Wayne Ott of EPA's
Office of Research and Development,
the public's response to the index has
been good. Ott, who was instrumental
in development of the PSI, said some
agencies nonetheless have  been re-
luctant to use the index.
  "Many agencies  are afraid that if
they say the word 'unhealthful,'  the
world will end," said Ott. "When the
PSI was presented in Mexico City, for
example, the local agency said it could
never do this, because if it said 'un-
healthful'   on  the  public  airwaves,
everyone would commit suicide. When
they tried it, however, they discovered
it was no problem at all."
  In the Midwest, all major cities wih a
population  of more than 500,000 now
use the PSI, except for Minneapolis-St..
Paul  and  Chicago.  'According to
spokesmen  for the  two  State   a«r
pollution control  agencies, Illinois
will implement the PSI system state-
wide  by  January  1980, and Minne-
apolis will  start  using  it  before the
January 1981 deadline.
  With the PSI in widespread use, per-
sons sensitive to air pollution can easily
interpret the effect of daily changes in
air quality on their health. Whether they
are in Los Angeles or New York City.
And with clearer information, citizens
can more  easily monitor their  ciW=
progress in the fight for cleaner air. n.

-------
                                             LETTERS
      Dear Editor:
        Usually, I  am thoroughly impressed  with  the
      quality of work evidenced in the magazine, and ap-
      preciate the interesting style in which it is conveyed.
        However, I feel compelled to respond to two small
      news items that appeared on page 19 of  the June
      1979 edition.  In particular, the first news item refer-
      ring to the Flambeau Mining case has several in-
      accurate statements:
      1. The out-of-court  settlement "will delay develop-
        ment of a copper  mine." This is not true. The min-
        ing company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ken-
        necott  Copper Corporation (which fact is impor-
        tant), had determined some time ago that it would
        not be mining in Wisconsin because of the current
        low market price  for copper. The court case had
        nothing to do with that decision.
      2. New mining legislation passed  last year by  the
        State legislature  precludes any mining permits
        in the  State until rules are promulgated by  the
        State agency to  carry out the  new law. Again,
        entirely unrelated to the court case.
      3. The company will "apply for new permits," as the
        article  states, but not as a result of the court
        settlement;  rather,  because  its prior    permit
        application was  dismissed by  a State hearing
        examiner,  which  decision was affirmed "by a  cir-
        cuit court/
                               new environmental impact statement" is, again,
                               totally untrue and would lead the readers to be-
                               lieve  that applicants  prepare  EISs.  Now, as  a
                               practical but illegal matter, that may be true in
                               some instances; as a general statement of the law,
                               clearly the EIS responsibility lies with the agency.
                              The sixth news item concerns the 7th Circuit Court
                            decision  regarding  the  Milwaukee  Metropolitan
                            Sewerage District mess:
                            1.  The 7th  Circuit did not rule that the city "does
                               not have to  embark on a multi-million dollar pro-
                               gram to  upgrade its sewage treatment system."
                          \     Quite the contrary. All but one of the lower court's
                               orders were vigorously upheld.
                            2.  You mention that the case was brought by the
                               State of Illinois and was joined by the  State of
                               Wisconsin, implying that both States were on the
                               same side. Again,  this is totally  untrue.  Credit
                               should go where it is due, to Illinois, and not to the
                               State of Wisconsin.which intervened on the side
                               of the City of  Milwaukee and fought the Federal
                               court decision. (Note also that if the State of Wis-
                               consin had enforced the applicable water laws in
                               Milwaukee for the past eight years, the State of
                               Illinois might not have had to go to court and
                               litigate for five years.)
                                                           Kathleen M. Falk
                                                           Genera/ Counsel
                                           Wisconsin's Environmental Decade
      4. The statement that the company "will prepare a
                 What do you think of the articles appearing in Environment Midwest? What kind of
               articles would you like to see? Do you  know something about local environmental
               issues that  we  might not  be aw'are of?   Send us your comments, ideas, and
               suggestions. As space permits, we'll include your comments in the "Letters" column.
                                                                               — The Editor
           FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
   Project Location

   Delphos, OH
   Galesburg San. Distr., IL

   Cottage Grove, Wl
   Carmel, IN
Estimated
Project Cost "


Design $392,350
Construction $4,095,250

Construction $642,000

Design $82,800
Construction $542,000

Design $13,980
Construction $136,400
Potential EPA Share

Design $294,263
Construction $3,071,437

Construction $481,500

$468,600
Design $10,485
Construction $102,300
                    A Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI)
                   is a notification to the public, prior to the grant
                   award, that EPA believes the project's environ-
                   mental impacts are not significant and that,
                   as a result, an Environmental Impact Statement
                   is not needed.
                    If you have comments or questions regarding
                   the above projects, contact Eugene  Chaiken,
                   Chief, Facilities Planning Branch at EPA Region
                   Vofficesin Chicago 1312)353-2124.
                  OFF
THE  PRESS
10
    Environmental Hotline '79. The
   7-page guide, published by EPA
  Region V, fists telephone num-
  bers for environmental emergen-
  cies, names and  phones of key
  EPA Region V personnel, EPA
  and other Federal^ agencies.
  Regional commissions. State and
  local   government  agencies,
  citizen   and    environmental
  groups, colleges and universities.
  For easy reference, information is
  grouped  under   six Region V
  States:   Illinois,    Indiana,
  Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and
  Wisconsin.  Available free from
  U.S. EPA Region  V, Office of
  Public  Affairs, 230 S. Dearborn
  St., Chicago,IL 60604.
                                                                                           EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
Around  The  Region...News...News...News...News
 ILLINOIS

 • By a vote  of 77 to 69, the House
 rejected a bill that would have banned
 the   shipment  of  spent   nuclear
 wastes into the State for storage.
  •"Illinois is becoming the nuclear gar-
 bage dump of the Nation," said  Sen.
 Charles Percy (R) as he registered his
 opposition against Federal takeover of
 the  General  Electric  nuclear waste
 storage facility near Morris.
 • One man was killed and 18 others
 hospitalized when toxic fumes escaped
 from a leaking chlorine storage cylinder
 at a smelter plant in East Alton.
 •The Senate passed a  hazardous
 waste disposal bill by a vote of 49 to
 2. Two  sets of  restrictions  on the
 location of hazardous waste  landfills
 were approved by the General Assem-
 bly and sent to the Governor. Although
 similar in most respects, the Senate bill
 also  requires the investigation of alter-
 nate disposal methods and gives coun-
 ty boards veto  power over landfill
 sites.

 INDIANA

  •A survey  by the  Department  of
 Natural Resources shows that since
 1907 man has filled in 3,688  acres  of
 land along the Indiana shore of Lake
Michigan.
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ap-
 proved a new port complex on the In-
 diana shore of the Ohio River, east  of
 Jeffersonville. Dredging of the Ohio
 to make room for barge anchorages
 was also authorized.
  •Sludge from sewage treatment is
 no longer available to the residents of
 Hammond.  The  sludge,  commonly
 used  as  garden  fertilizer,   showed
 traces of cadmium  and  lead.  Plot
 enough to cause harm, but "we don't
 want to take a chance," officials said.
  •Indiana University .is conducting a
$60,000 State-funded study of Cedar
 Lake to see if the lake can be restored.
 More than 80 percent of the residents
 approved some kind  of effort to save
 the lake. The study  should  be com-
 pleted by November.
  •The Indiana Stream Pollution Con-
 trol Board approved  the construction
 of a, 42-inch sewer  line  between
 Merrillville 
-------
LAKE   ER1
 By Susan Nelson
 It is not news that there are deposits
of natural gas beneath Lake  Erie.
Canadian rigs began drilling for and ex-
tracting it early in this century,and they
began in earnest to withdraw
significant amounts of natural gas
during the 1950s.
 What is news, especially during the
energy crisis, is a cooperative study by
EPA, the Army Corps  of  Engineers
(COE), and the Department of Energy
(DOE) that began quietly last year. Its
purpose is to take a careful, thorough
look at environmental and  economic
issues involved in drilling for natural
gas before any more exploration oc-
curs beneath U.S. waters of Lake Erie.
(An invisible line stretches across the
Lake  —  see map — and forms the
U.S.-Canadian boundary)
 Officially called "Assessment of the
Development of Natural Gas in  U.S.

 A drill bit used for natural-gas exploration,
 shown approximately one-quarter size.
      I -•»
Lake Erie," the study began last Sep-
tember and is scheduled to last 18
months.COE and EPA are funding the
study, which is divided into three
phases. Phase I ended in March; 3194-
page report, "An Examination of Issues
Related to U.S. Lake Erie Natural Gas
Development," has been prepared as a
result. (To receive a copy, write to Paul
J. Horvatin, U.S. EPA Great Lakes
National Program Office, 536 S. Clark
St., Chicago, IL 60605.)
 Phase II of the project is now in
progress. It is a 6-month field study to
assess the environmental impacts such
drilling could be expected to have upon
Erie, the shallowest and most troubled
of the five Great Lakes. This phase is
being conducted by specialists  from
Argonne National Laboratory, a DOE
facility. EPA specialists from the Great
Lakes National Program Office in
EPA  Region V, Chicago, and  spe-
cialists from COE's  Buffalo,  N.Y.
district are keeping in close contact in
order to draw their own conclusions.
 An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS), prepared by the COE, will result
from  Phase II. EPA will draw up
guidelines  based on the EIS. These
guidelines will govern  development
that does occur, should environmental
studies now under way suggest that
natural gas development in U.S.  Lake
Erie can be carried out without en-
vironmental danger. COE will use the
EIS in its imminent job of deciding
whether or not to grant construction
permits. Public hearings will be  held
when the  EIS is completed. Arrange-
ments will be announced when they
 have been made.
  The study is significant because it is
 being done before an immediate need
 for it exists. Although drilling is per-
 mitted by New York, Ohio, and Penn-
 sylvania (where limited exploration
 has taken place), no one may drill
 for gas  beneath Lake  Erie until af-
 ter the EIS and guidelines are ready. At
 this writing, no companies have appli-
 ed for licenses to exploit for gas bene-
 ath Lake Erie on the U.S. side. If any
 should, they will require to await the
 results of the 18-month study.
  In other words, there cannot be any
 drilling before mid-1980, and its doubt-
 ful that any U.S. Lake Erie gas would
 enter the market until after that time.
  The study is also significant because
 it is not limited only to the three U.S.
 Government agencies. It also involves
 cooperation fron Canada, which shares
 cleanup of and concern for the Great
 Lakes with the U.S. The international
 Joint Commission • (IJC), the bi-
 national  body that oversees cleanup,
 in 1970  advised against drilling, for
 natural gas in the eastern section of
 Lake Erie, east of a north-south line ex-
tending from Point Pelee, Ontario, to
 Marblehead, Ohio. The  lake botttom
east of that line is considered too un-
stable for such exploration — and too
likely to produce oil, which would be a
serious new source  of pollution to
drinking water for millions of people.

  Because the  U.S. Government is
looking at the effects and methods of
drilling for gas, it only makes sense to
spend time on  rigs that already are
                               Source  of
                                                                EM/AUGUST

-------
IE:
a New

 Scientists collect water samples for Phase II of the joint Federal study to assess possible effects of Lake Erie drilling.
 U. S. Natural Gas?
GUST 1979
              13

-------
 A New Source of U.S. Natural Gas?
drilling.   The  Province  of  Ontario
welcomed  U.S.  specialists onto the
rigs they regulate so that  they might
see what Canada has found to be the
most economical and environmentally
sound ways of extracting this valuable
source of natural  energy.
  EPA is involved in the study project
because  it is concerned  about what
such drilling could mean to Lake Erie
and to the Great Lakes ecosystem.
  Effluents that are part of the drilling
cycle are of serious concern. Brines  —
face  in  drilling  are  placed  on
"shaleshakers," fine mesh screens that
both allow the rock chips to fall back
into the water and recycle the muds.
But a certain portion of these muds
adhere  to  the  rock  cuttings  and
become an as-yet-undefined source of
pollution to the lake.
  Sands that come up with the muds
are yet  another concern.  Because
natural  gas   is  found  beneath  and
within sandstone and other soft rock
that lies hundreds or thousands of fpet
sediments, where contaminants as well
as underwater life are found.
  To put these issues in their proper
perspective and to find answers to the
questions of  most  concern  is  the
reason for EPA's close tracking  of
studies now being done.
  Canada  apparently  feels   it   has
satisfactorily answered such questions.
By the end of 1977, more than 1,042
Canadian  wells  had   been  drilled
beneath Ontario's section of Lake Erie.
(Ontario  is the only Canadian province
      What is Natural Gas
        By definition, natural gas is "a natural fuel con-
      taining methane  and hydrocarbons that occurs in
      certain geological formations...either in the gaseous
      phase or  in solution with  crude oil  in natural  un-
      derground reservoirs."
        Natural gas is highly flammable and nearly odorless
      —the odor we smell in our house when it is escaping
      has been added by gas companies to alert consumers
      to any gas leaks,
        Gas is an important source of fuel.  Homes use it
      for heat, heating water, and cooking, Industries use it
      to fire the boilers that make steel, and for a  host of
      Other purposes.
        It is not known for  sure if gas, like oil,  formed
      during an organic  or  an  inorganic  process.  The
      inorganic  theory  holds that hydrogen and  carbon
      were brought together under great pressure and tem-
      perature deep  in the earth, and that the gas and oil
      that resulted found their way through  porous rocks
                    to collect in natural  raps in the formation of the
                    earth,
                     The organic theory, held by most scientists, ex-
                    plains that the hydrogen and carbon needed to form
                    gas  and oil  came from  the  decay of tiny,ancient
                    plants and animals. Over a period of millions of years,
                    rivers that flowed down to the seas carried with them
                    great volumes of mud and sand that were spread out
                    by currents and  tides  over  sea  bottoms. New
                    deposits were distributed, and tides over sea bot-
                    toms. New deposits were distributed, and under in-
                    creasing weight of the new beds the ocean floors
                    slowly sank. This in time  created sedimentary rocks
                    —sandstones and shales, limestones and dolomites.
                    — beneath and in which natural gas is found.
                     The tiny organisms that died and settled to the
                    bottom were buried and  sealed off from the air. In
                    time, pressure and warm temperatures, bacteria and
                    chemical combinations of decaying produced both
                    natural gas and oil                          — S.M

salt  water —  can  present greater
problems for both drinking water and
the living  organisms in the lake than
was once thought.
,  The  clay and chemicals known as
"drilling muds" are another matter that
concerns EPA. These muds are pump-
ed forn the surface into the cores of
the bits that drill  hundreds of feet
down  into  the wells,  in  order to
lubricate and cool the bits. Chips and
rock cuttings that are raised to the sur-
beneath the  lake, sand would be  a
natural by-product  of gas  drilling.
  In the drilling process, strong acids
are  used  to  dissolve  rocks within
wells.These acids and other chemicals
are pumped into the wells in  order to
extract more gas, and some  of them
could accidentally be let out  into the
lake.
  Even changing 'the  nature of  the
lake bottom,  however slightly, could
result  in   a  resuspension   of  the
that borders Lake Erie—or any of the
Great Lakes.) Some  430  wells are
currently producing or awaiting hook-
up to produce gas for an underwater
collection system that includes  some
200 miles of pipeline. Since  1971 Can-
adian wells have produced more than
113.7 billi«rr"cubic feet (bcf) of gas, at
an annual average rate of  5.6  bcf a
year.  Ontario's success  rate —gas
found in holes^ drilled—is 65 percent.
14
                                                       EM/AUGUST 1979

-------

 Two drill-rig workers at a site EPA visited operate equipment similar to that which would be used aboard rigs in U. S. Lake fyie.
  The Canadian rigs that are  being
studied in Phase II are  rotary jack-up
rigs with floating drill ships. More than
95 percent  of  Canada's wells in  the
lake  are now  being drilled  by four
rotary units: Timesaver II, the Mr. Neil
(on the  cover), Telesis, and  the  Mr.
Chris.
  The Mr. Neil  rig is 118 feet long and
50 feet wide. The rig is propelled, like a
boat/to  the  site of intended  drilling,
with four legs up,When it is positioned
for drilling,legs  are lowered and the rig
is raised automatically.Such rigs as the
Mr. Neil are capable of drilling in water
depths of up to 225 feet. (Lake  Erie's
maximum depth is 210 feet.) When  a
well has been  drilled and gas found,
divers Connect  pipes to  it beneath  the
water. The  pipes are  connected to
compressors on shore,  which extract
the gas and force  it into distribution
into distribution  pipelines.  They,  in
turn, direct  the gas to industry or  to
homes.
  Whether  or not  it will be  decided
that U.S. waters of Lake Erie are wor-
thy of being explored and  drilled for
natural gas  remains to be seen. EPA
and COE are withholding judgment un-
til the EIS is completed.
  And, if the EIS suggests that drilling
could  be  done  without  adverse en-
vironmental  effects.upon Lake Erie, any
companies that  decide they want  to
explore for natural gas will face a two-
step process before they invest in rigs
and crews  — after they  are awarded
leases  and other approvals by the ap-
propriate State.
  First, they will be required to apply
for construction permits from the COE,
to get rigs out into the lake and to build
pipelines out  to  them. Second, they
wilLbe required to apply for NPDES
(National   Pollutant   Discharge  Eli-
mination  System)  permits  from  the
State to prove to the State and to EPA
that  whatever discharge  associated
with the drilling  they  do will be  en-
vironmentally sound.
  The final question industry will have
to ask  itself is whether  or not  the
drilling for  natural gas  beneath La,ke
Erie will be worth the expense required
to maintain whatever  environmental
balance will be callen for—if that is
the recommendation of the  18-month
study.*!*

Susan Nelson  is  a Writer/Editor with
EPA Region V who specializes in Great
Lakes matters.
 EM/AUGUST 1979
                                                                        15

-------

 How Much Gas Might There Be?
   Researchers  have been  estimating  possible re-
 serves of natural gas beneath Lake Erie for years.
   Total gas production for the three Lake1 Erie States
 interested  in gas drilling (Ohio, Pennsylvania, and
 New York) in 1975 was 178.2 billion cubic feet  (bcf),
 with Ohio producing 85.8 bcf. This supply of natural
 gas is from on-shore wells, which each of the three
 States  has.  The State of Michigan opposes gas
 drilling beneath its share of Lake Erie and the other
 Great Lakes it borders.
   Over a one-year period that ended  in March 1978,
 Ohio consumed more natural gas than did Pennsyl-
 vania  and New York  combined. Ohio  industries
 consumed 74  percent  of  the  State's total  100.5
 bcf.
   If drilling were permitted, estimates from the New
 York State Energy Office  (1977)  and the Ontario
 Ministry of Natural  Resources (Hurd and Kingston,
 1978) respectively suggest that between 533 and 888
 bcf  might be produced over a 22-year period within
 a 10-county area in the three States.
   Hurd and  Kingston, both  Canadians,  in  1978
 placed Canadian and U.S. Lake Erie  natural gas re-
 sources at 1,000 bcf each. Canada, they said, has
 already exploited 10 percent of that potential, and
 they estimated that another 20 percent is extractable
 with current  knowledge. They also suggested that
 50-90  percent of potential  U.S. reserves could be
 exploited with present knowledge.
   U.S. Lake Erie gas was estimated in 1976 to repre-
 sent between 0.2 and  0.4  percent of total proved
 U.S. natural gas reserves.
   If maximum production and natural gas deregula-
 tion  both occurred in  1985,  a Stanford Research
 Institute study has suggested that Lake Erie  reserves
would  account for  about 1  percent of the reserves
estimated for  a 1 3-State region.
                                                    Aboard a vessel drilling for natural gas, with drill-rig tower.

                                                                                              EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
               Environmental news briefs...briefs...briefs.
                                                                D
EPA Files Lawsuit Under RCRA
Against Cleveland Firm
  EPA Region V Office in Chicago
went to court to clean up  hazardous
wastes at the Chemicals & Minerals
Reclamation Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio.
  A civil complaint and a motion for a
temporary  restraining order  (TRO)
were filed on EPA's behalf by the U.S.
Attorney for the Northern District of
Ohio against the firm in Cleveland. The
TRO, granted by the judge or July 11,
requires that the firm reduce the risk of
fire, explosion, and toxic fumes presen-
ted  by  several thousand  carelessly
stpred hazardous waste drums on the
firm's property. The ultimate goal of
the lawsuit is the removal of all drums
and  the  safe disposal  of  hazardous
wastes in the drums.
  This is the first case Region V EPA
filed under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) in which the
extraordinary remedy of the TRO was
sought.
State Clean Air Plans Rolling in:
EPA Approval Expected by Fall

  In the  Midwest, Indiana and Mich-
igan have submitted complete State
Implementation  Plans (SIPs) for clean
air. Minnesota  and Wisconsin  have
submitted partial plans; and Ohio will
submit portions of its plan by the end
of August. Portions of the Illinois SIP
have appeared in the Federal Register
and are now open for approval. (See
following news brief.)
  Under the 1977 Clean Air Act Amend-
ments, the deadline for SIP submission
was January 1,  1979 and the deadline
for SIP approval was Julyl, 1979. The
amendments  also  mandate  that is-
suance of new-source construction
permits may be delayed on certain con-
struction  projects in States  that are
late with their plans. However, because
of "good-faith efforts of Midwestern
  NPDES Violators in
  the Midwest
    Below are some  of the more
  serious violators  of  NPDES
  permits.  Formal Enforcement
  actions have been  initiated ag-
  ainst them.
  ILLINOIS
  Commonwealth Edison Co.,
    Joliet
  Commonwealth Edison Co.,
    Waukegan
  Commonwealth Edison Co.,
    Will County
  Modern Plating Corp^
    Freeport
  SCM Corp., (Glidden Durkee
    Division), Joliet
  Caseyville Township
  City of Chester
 Wastewater Dischargers Fail to
 Comply With NPDES Permits

   Of  the  1,075  major  wastewater
 dischargers in the six-State Midwest
 Region, 394 (or 37 percent) were found
 in violation of their National Pollutant
 Discharge  Elimination  System  (NP-
 DES) permits.
 EM/AUGUST 1979
States in  developing these clean  air
plans, Federal  funds for  highways,
sewage treatment facilities, and other
projects will not by cut off," said EPA
'Region V Administrator John McGuire.

EPA Invites  Public Comment
on  Illinois SIP
  EPA Region V has  proposed to ap-
prove specific  portions of  the Illinois
draft State Implementation  Plan (SIP),
after the public has had a chance to
comment  on the  SIP or  on EPA's
proposal by August 30, 1979. Details of
EPA's decision on this plan were pub-
lished  in  the  July 2, 1979 Federal
Register.
   The SIP outlines how Illinois plans to
 reduce air pollution  to  Federally  ac-
 ceptable  levels by 1982, or in  some
 special cases by 1987. The two target
 years are specified by the  1977 Clean
 Air  Act  Amendments.  The  aim of
 City of East St. Louis
 City of Herrin
 City of Pekin
 INDIANA
 Amoco Oil Co., Whiting
 Bunge Corp., Clymers
 Laketon Asphalt Refining Inc.,
   Laketon
 City of Charlestown
 City of East Chicago
 City of Elkhart
 City of Plymouth
 City of Portage
 MICHIGAN
 BASFWyandotteCo.,
   Wyandotte
 Lear Siegler, Inc., Mendon
 National Standard Co., Niles
 Muskegon County, Muskegon
 City of Wyoming
   The  Quarterly  Noncompliance
  Report, released by EPA Region V Of-
  fice,  covered  violations  between
  January  1  and  March   31,  1979.
  Violations ranged from failure to sub-
  mit a discharge monitoring report to
  failure  to  meet  a   construction
  schedule.  Violations of the final ef-
  fluent limitations contained in the per-
Illinois and other State clean air plans is
to control the six most hazardous  air
pollutants: ozone, carbon  monoxide,
particulates  (smoke,  dust,  fly ash),
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and
hydrocarbons.
  Comments on the Illinois SIP or  on
EPA's proposed action 'should be sent
by August 30 to: Maxine Borcherding,
U.S. EPA Region V, 230 S. Dearborn
St., Chicago, IL 60604. Comments are
especially solicited for those portions
of the SIP that  EPA has proposed to
approve conditionally.
  Copies of the  Illinois draft SIP and
the July 2, 1979 ^FederalRegister are
available for public inspection at the
above EPA office. In addiition, the SIP
may  be  examined  at  Illinois  EPA
headquarters,  2200  Churchill  Rd.,
Springfield,  IL 62706.' Copies of the
 Federal Register may also be available
at certain law and public libraries.
MINNESOTA
Minnesota Power and Light Co.,
  Aurora
S.B. Foot Tanning Co., Red Wing
City of Hutchinson
City of Moorhead
City of Rochester
OHIO
Chemlime Corp.'Lisbon
Standard  Oil Co., Lima
Sun Oil Co., Toledo
City of Massillon
City of Mount Vernon
Summit County #6 Plant,
  Hudson
WISCONSIN
Appleton Papers Inc., Appleton
Niagara of Wisconsin Paper Co.,
  Niagara
City of Jefferson
 mits were also cited.
   Major violators by State are: Illinois,
 152; Indiana, 22;  Michigan, 71; Min-
 nesota, 20; Ohio,  97; and Wisconsin,
 32.    	
   All   NPDES  permit violations are
 being followed up with appropriate en-
 forcement actions either by the States
 or by EPA.
                                17

-------
                                                        briefs...briefs,..briefs.    J
Hazardous Waste Enforcement and
Emergency  Response  System
Established

   In July EPA announced the establi-
shment of  a  nationwide  Hazardous
Waste Enforcement and  Emergency
Response System to deal  with hazar-
dous waste emergencies.
   Part of  the system is  a National
Hazardous Waste Enforcement Task
Force and a new unit in the Oil and
Special Materials Control Division. The
Enforcement Task Force willcoordinate
Federal  cleanup activities  with  its
regional offices and with the States, in-
cluding technical, scientific, and legal
support work.
  The cleanup of  hazardous waste
dump sites that threaten public health
has been assigned the "highest agency
priority," EPA headquarters said.  EPA
has now identified  151  dump sites
nationwide   that contain  potentially
dangerous   amounts  of  hazardous
wastes. Another 60  dump sites,  also
presenting potential  hazard to public
health and the environment, have been
just recently discovered.

EPA Launches Chemical
Substances Review Program
   EPA began reviewing on July 1  new
chemical substances before they are
manufactured  for  commercial  pur-
poses, to evaluate any possible risks
that such  chemicals may present to
human health or the environment.
   If great risks are present, EPA  may
restrict the use of such chemicals, it
may control their production or use, or
it may seek an outright ban on produc-
tion through an administrative order or
court injunction.
   The program, known  "premarket
notification," is a major step in EPA's
efforts to control toxic  substances.
EPA expects to receive about 400 of
these notifications during the next 11
months.
   If  EPA   believes   that  it's  not
necessary to regulate a chemical in any
way,  the  manufacturer   may begin
production   after   the   advance
notification period is complete, without
specific EPA approval.
   For premarket notification forms and
instruction  manuals,  or  further  in-
formation.call EPA's Region V Toxic
Substances Office, Paul Meriage (312)
353-2291.

18
WHERE THE WASTES ARE: MIDWEST REGION STATUS REPORT
v^ ^X^^x 'k^A \aw\^''%. \ ^ X^1^ \
\\
EPA REGION V
3M
Woodbury Village, MN
American Recovery Co., Inc.
E. Chicago, IN
Ansul Chemical Co.
Marinette, WS
Arrowhead Refining Co.
Duluth, MN
Bofors Lakeway, Inc.
Muskegon, Ml
Byron Salvage
Ogle County, IL
Calumet Container
Hammond, IN
Cast Forge, Inc.
Howell, Ml
Central Landfill
Montcalm Co., Ml
Cherrington Scrap Metal
Oak Hill, OH
Chemical Mineral Reclamation
Cleveland, OH
Conservation Chemical Co.
Gary, IN
Fisher-Kalo Chemicals
Kingsbury, IN
Gratiot County Landfill
St. Louis, Ml
Hammer's Construction Co.
Perham, MN
Hooker Chemical Co.
Montague, Ml
Interstate Pollution Control
Rockford, IL
Kerr-McGee Disposal Site
West Chicago, IL
Laskin Greenhouse/Waste ON
Jefferson, OH
Lyles Trucking
Belleville, Ml
Mid-Co #1 and #2
Gary, IN
Musket Ranch & Trading Post
Anoka Co., MN
Pollution Controls Inc.
Shakopee, MN
Reilly Tar & Chemical Co.
St. Louis Park, MN
'• Robert Ross & Sons Inc.
Grafton, OH
Seymour Recycling Corp.
Jackson County, IN
Story Chemical Company
Muskegon Co., Ml
Summit National Services, Inc.
Portage Co., Ml
Tipton-Martin
Winnebago Co., IL
U.S. Drum
Chicago, 4L
Weisman Scrap Metal
Winona, MN
West K.L. Avenue Landfill
Kalamazoo, Ml









0

•

v

0

0







0





0













_

0











0





vj

' §



































0















































0



















1

























«v^

0

0

0



0







0































0

•

0







•






0

0

• •

0



0

^





—



0



^

'0

•

0

0



0

^



^



•



0



0

•

•

yS



^

0



•



0

0



V



0

0

0



0



0

0

0

0 .

0



0







0



0

•

0

vv

9

0

0

0

•

•

0

0

0



0



0

0

0
(
0

•

0

0

0

0

0



0

0

0

0

0

0

0

•

0

£\

0




<












0




































'








                                                                                        EM/AUGUST .1979

-------
               Environmental news briefs.,.briefs...briefs...
                                                            S...J
 Lake Michigan Researchers
 Find High Levels of Tin

  Two scientist have found organic tin
 compounds in southern Lake Michigan
 that exceed the expected levels.
  Dr.  Thomas  Tisue of  Argonne
 National  Laboratory  in  Argonne,
 Illinois, first  came across evidence of
 the compounds in 1975-76, when he
 was testing and analyzing those waters,
 for many trace elements. He routinely
 sent results of his findings to Scripps
 Institute of Oceanography in La Jolla,
 California, where researchers  noted
 that levels of tin were very much higher
 than those found in the oceans.
  In September 1978 Dr. Tisue and Dr.
 Vernon  Hodge of Scripps went  on a
 research   cruise   in  southern   Lake
 Michigan and took independent, con-
 current core samples of the sediments.
 They analyzed  their samples by  in-
 dependent techniques in their respec-
 tive laboratories and  both  found  tin
 levels at between  1  and 3 parts per
 billion  in the waters—roughly 1,000
 times higher than  levels found along
 the seacoasts. Sediment samples from
 the  lake   bottom   showed  con-
 centrations  of  around 20  parts per
 million.
   The increase in  levels  of tin, par-
 ticulary in the sediments, suggests that
 man's activity is responsible: Sediment
 samples dating from  the 1800s show
 only about 1  part tin per million.
   The organic  tin  in  question  has
 several things in common with  lead,
 another metal  that  has   shown  a
 marked increase in  the  Great Lakes.
 Tin compounds are used to control lar-
 vae of the liver fluke and other pests,
 and they are used in such products as
 marine antifouling paint.
   Dr. Hodge presented  a paper  on
 these  findings  at  the American
 Chemical Society's annual meeting in
 Honolulu, in  May. In June  Dr. Tisue
 presented a  paper  at  ACS's  Great
 Lakes regional meeting  in Rockford,
 Illinois.
   Dr. Tisue emphasizes that "all work
 at this point is preliminary and needs
 substantiation. We need to make more
 extensive measurements."
   Argonne  National  Laboratory has a
 continuing program grant from EPA to
 cover research on toxic substances in
 the Great Lakes.
 Great Lakes Water Quality
 Subject of 3-Day Conference

  More  than 200 scientists,  environ-
mentalists,   members  of  the  news
media,.and the general public attend-
ed  the  annual  Great  Lakes Water
Quality Meeting of  the  International
Joint Commission (DC)  July 9-11 in
Detroit.  They  heard  that, while  the
quality of the Great  Lakes appears to
be improving, many problems continue
to pjague the world's most extensive
freshwater system.
  The  IJC, consisting  of  three
Canadian  and  three  U.S.  com-
missioners,   is   responsible   for
monitoring  water  quality  cleanup ef-
forts under the 1978 Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement between the two
 countries. *.
   Key  topics   reported  on    and
 discussed were acid rain and toxic con-
 tamination;  long-range  atmospheric
 transport of such pollutants as PCBs;
 human health effects of pollution in the
 Great Lakes; phosphorus management
 programs; and  radioactivity levels in
the Lakes.
   Reports  of  the   conference  are
 available from  the  IJC. To  receive
 them, state areas of your interest  and
 address your inquiry to Patricia Bonner
 at the IJC Regional Office, 100 Ouelet-
 te Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9A 6T3.
 Minnesota First State to Receive
 OK for Pretreatment Program

  Minnesota became the first State in
 the Nation to receive EPA approval for
 its  proposed  municipal wastewater
 pretreatment  and  toxic  substances
 control program. The program, OK'd
 by EPA in July, will supplement the
 National Pollutant Discharge elimina-
 tion  (NPDES) program which Minne-
 sota  has  been  administering since
 June 1974.
  The pretreatment  program, author-
ized by the Clean Water Act of 1977, li-
mits the types and amounts of pollu-
tants—particularly toxic substances—
that may be discharged by industries
into municial sewage treatment plants.
It also seeks to improve the recycling
and reclamation of  industrial  waste-
water and sludge.
  While  many  municipalities  have
existing  pretreatment programs, it is
EPA's  and   Minnesota's  intent  to
upgrade and conform them to the NP-
 DES  program and  to establish  ad-
 ditional  programs where needed.
 Together with NPDES program,  the
 pretreatment program will help assure
 the  control  of toxic  substance
 discharges and provide better overall
 wastewater control by  bringing Min-
 nesota's  industrial  dischargers  into
 compliance with  Federal and  State
 water,  air, and sludge  standards and
 regulations.
$1.6  Billion  Hazardous  Waste
"Superfund" Proposed
  Calling oil spills and human exposure
to hazardous wastes two of the worst
pollution  problems  in  the  Nation,
President  Carter  asked  Congress in
June to establish  A $1.6 billion "super-
fund" to help clean up such pollution.
  The  fund,  which will consist  of
Federal money and fees on the oil and
chemical industry, would be built up in
EM/August 79
four years: $250 million the first year,
$375 million the second year, and $500
million in the third and fourth years.
  The proposed legislation  requires
that Govenment  be notified of spills
and the presence of abandoned hazar-
dous  waste  sites. It would provide
emergency authority for the Govern-
ment to clean up and alleviate the im-
pact of spills and contain pollution at
waste disposal sites. Another provision
would  alllow  the  Government  to
recover clean  up costs from  those
responsible for creating pollution ha-
zards. Compensation to innocent vic-
tims of spills for property damage or,
for loss of income because of damage
to marine life is also provided.
  Eighty  percent of the fund would
come from fees paid by business and
industry; 20 percent from Government
approprations.
                               19

-------
            Environmental news briefs...briefs...briefs
                                                          D
Stricter PCB Levels
Effective August 28

  On June 28 the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) announced new,
lower allowable levels of PCBs (poly-
chlorinated  biphenyls) for  fish,  poul-
try, and dairy products sold  in  in-
terstate commerce. The effective date
for the new requirements is August 28.
  Allowable PCB  levels for fish will be
lowered from 5 parts per million (ppm)
to 2 ppm; for milk and dairy products,
from 2.5 to 1.5 ppm; for poultry from 5
to 3 ppm; and for eggs, from 0.5 to 0.3
ppm.
  In  issuing its new, stricter  levels,
FDA expressed concern about effects
on commercial as well as sports fishing
Alfred West

  Alfred W. West,  chief of  the
 Operational Technology Branch at
 EPA's   National  Training  and
 Operational Technology Center in
 Cincinatti, Ohio,  received  the
 Distinguished Career Award for his
20
in  the  Great  Lakes. "With  few ex-
ceptions," the FDA said, "saltwater
species, which constitute most of the
fish in  the American diet, are rarely
contaminated  with PCBs. The highest
levels of  PCBs  are concentrated in
freshwater fish, such as coho and chin-
ook salmon from the Great Lakes,fresh
water trout and catfish." FDA estimat-
ed that there could be "a loss of about
$6 million  worth of fish a year" that
cannot be sold under the new rules.
  Commercial fishing has already been
severely set back as a result of the 5
ppm levels for PCBs, and most Great
Lakes issue advisories for persons who
catch and can  be expected to eat Great
Lakes fish.
  The  International  Joint  Com-
mission's Great  Lakes Water  Quality
1978 Annual Report  notes a  contin-
uing decline of PCBs in eastern Lake
Michigan coho salmon. The decline is
not noted, however, in western Lake
Michigan cohos and in the other Great
Lakes whose fish or herring gull popul-
tions have shown PCB contamination.
  Extensive monitoring of the Great
Lakes and their  fish and wildlife con-
tinues. EPA, FDA, and State agencies
recommend  that  fatty  portions  of
Great Lakes fish  be  removed (see
diagram). Great  Lakes fish weighing
more than 7 pounds may be expected
to have higher-than-allowed PCB con-
centrations.
                                           PEOPLE
  "outstanding  contributions, leader-
  ship, and dedication to the control
  of  water  pollution."  West,   a
  sanitary engineer, is retiring after 18
  years with EPA and  predecessor
  agencies.  He also  holds the EPA
  Gold Medal for Exceptional Service.
   John T. Rhett. since 1973 EPA's
  deputy  assistant administrator for
  Water Programs  Operations,  has
  been nominated by President Carter
  to the newly created post of federal
  inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas
  Transportation System. Rhett's new
  duties will  include  supervising the
  enforcement of all permits and other
  authorizations   issued   by  any
  Federal  agency  relating  to con-
  struction of the 4,748-mile pipeline.
   Dr. Vilma Hunt, deputy assistant
  administrator  of EPA,  has  been
  promoted  to  direct all EPA  health
  research activities.
  Warren L. Braun,  Virginia State
 Water Control Board, has been elec-
 ted to serve a second year as chair-
 man of the Ohio River Valley Water
 Sanitation   Commission  (OR-
 SANCO).    Dr.   Richard  S.
 Engelbrecht,  professor  of  en-
 vironmental engineering, University
 of Illinois,  will serve as vice chair-
 man.
  Gordon  G.  Robeck, director of
  Drinking  Water Research  at  the
  EPA Environmental Research Cen-
  ter   in  Cincinnati,  received  the
  American     Water     Works
  Association's highest award — the
  Medal for Outstanding Service.  It
  was  awarded  for  his   role   in
  promoting the exchange  of  in-
  formation on safe drinking water.
   The American  Water  Works
  Association (AWWA) honored two
  other EPA scientists in Cincinnati.
  Taking bows 'as  co-authors of a
  prize-winning technical paper are
  Alan A.  Stevens, chief of the Or-
  ganic Control —  Chemical Studies
  Section,  and Dr. James M. Sy-
  mons, chief of  the Physical and
  Chemical  Contaminant   Removal
  Branch.  Their paper, "Measure-
  ment of  Trihalomethane  and Pro-
  cursor   Concentration  Changes,"
  was cited by AWWA as the "most
  notable contribution to the science
  or practice of. water works develop-
  ment as recorded  in a publication."
   Glen Sheppard,  editor of the
  North Woods  Call  in Charlevoix
  County,   Michigan,  received  the
  $1,000 Ben East Prize for excellence
  in  conservation  journalism.  The
  award was instituted three years
  ago by the Michigan United Con-
  servation  Clubs.  It  also   selected
 Assistant  State's Attorney General
  Stewart   H.    Freeman   as
  Michigan's Conservationist of the
  Year.
                                                    EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
       CD
       O)
       v—

       i
       03
       3
   8
Applicant                 Award Amount
 ILLINOIS
 Centralia                          *    9,675
 Kankakee                             40,350
 Ogden                                 5,130
 Western Springs                       20,250
 Dolton                                10,575.
 Richview                               3,750
 Gibson City                           63,225
 Oak Forest                            73,500
 Bismarck                              16,125
 North Riverside                        14,400
 Crystal Lake                           30,000
 Willow Hill                            25,500
 Phenix Township                       2,250
 Oquawka;                             23,700
 Murphysboro                          39,375
 Vernon                                5,700
 Dallas City                             9,675
 Schaumburg                         145,650
 Sterling                               24,644
 Annawan                              3,075
 Urbana-Champaign Sanitary District      7,500
 Decatur Sanitary District                81,150
 Oilman                                41,475
 Bloom Township Sanitary District       146,250
 GlenEllyn                          1,116,525
 Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago  6,361
 Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago 29,631
 Downers Grove Sanitary District        ' 83,949
 Bureau                               339,300
 Casey                             1,233,150
 South Palos Township Sanitary District  162,075
 Metropolitan Sanitary Egan
  Dewatering Facilities               4,101,000
 INDIANA
 Indianapolis                       $   50,325
 Dunkirk                              159,600
 Jasonville                              7,200
 Richmond Sanitary District             213,600
 Hamilton                           2,282,320
 Rising Sun                            15,150
 Delaware                            202,200
 Carlisle                            1,097,025
 St. John                           3,710,175
 Jasonville                          1,089,225
 Portland                           2,676,075
 Beech Grove                         139,350
 Anderson Township                 1,139,925
 MICHIGAN
 Kent County                      $   19,386
 BranchCounty                         26,475
 Gumming Township                     3,000
 Watertown Township                  10,200
 Cass County                          22,275
 Detroit                             2,833,500
 Albert Township                       39,750
 Vicksburg                            537,075
 Hillsdale                              33,149
 White Cloud                          10,969
 Dewitt                                10,575
 Peck                                  2,449
 Pewamo                               1,335
 Adams Twp-S. Range Sew. Auth.      253,425
 Caro                                206,250
 Leelanau                               7,499
 Detroit                            1,138,425
 Oakland                             121,050
 Union Township                    1,346,325
 Genesee County                       25,575
 Potterville                              8,475
 Hart                                 29,399
 Ludington                              5,250
 Calhoun County                       30,675
 White Cloud                       3,363,300
 Ottawa                             2,441,550
 Nashville                           2,838,950
                                   1,105,650
                                   9,802,800
               Coopersville
               Kalamazoo Township
Date


6/19
6/8
6/13
6/25
C /1Q
6/23
6/28
c/no
D/Zo
6/28
6/28
fi/n
u/ 10
fi/9R
vltCO
6/28
fi/19
O/ I i,
c/ork
6/29
e/no
D/xb
R/9«
O/«.Q
fi/19
Q/ IZ
6/28
6/5
R/9K
D/ZQ
c/o
D/O
C/-1Q
o/iy
fi/9~7
D/Z/
fi/OK
D//O
fi/fl
u/o
R/R
O/D
6/4
6/8
6/27
6/28
C/OQ
Q/^y
c /no
O/ZO
6/8
6/29
6/25
6/25
6/25
6/12
6/25
6/29
6/28
6/29
6/29
6/26
6/29

6/6
6/27
6/29
6/29
6/12
6/28
6/29
6/19
6/26
6/19
6/8
6/19
6/15
6/26
6/28'
6/27
fi/4
D/*T
R/1Q
D/ la
fi/A
D/H
6/29
6/27
6/22
fi/57
W/A/
c/nc
W/&JJ
e/OQ
D/Zi?
fi/OQ
D/A9
fi/9Q
\3tfa
C/TQ
b/^3
A/OO
O/Z9
Applicant Award Amount
Gun Plain Township
Rockford
Martin
MINNESOTA
Norwood
Monticello
Waseca
Pelican Rapids
Spring Valley
Metro Waste Control Commission
Chatfield
Shafer
Vergas
Wykoff
Middle River
Walnut Grove
Cyrus
Waldorf
Round Lake
Hancock
Hills City
Wabasso
Hutchinson
Avoca
Northfield
Brainerd
St. Joseph
Caledonia
Two Harbors
Metro Waste Control Commission
Metro Waste Control Commission
Red Wing
Brainerd
Metro Waste Control Commission
OHIO
Erie County $
Muskingum County
New Concord
Green Camp
Tiffin
Fostoria
Vermilion
Marysville
Delphos
Unio polls
Eaton
Uniopolis
Columbus
Rutland
Erie County
Liberty Center
Lorain
Ft. Loramie
New Holland
Solon
Ashley
Clermont County
Carlisle
Waterville
Trenton
Xenia
Xenia
Urbanna
Warren Water Authority
Yorkville
WISCONSIN
Blue River $
Darlington
Brookfield
Centuria
Appleton
Sturgeon Bay
Poygan Sanitary District
Poplar
• Kiel
Madison Metropolitan Sanitary District
Somerset
Durand
Elroy
1,293,075
161,625
1,480,050

$ 3,600
2,925
21,750
900
9,750
39,675
18,600
8,325
12,525
15,825
15,300
, 24,450
20,700
28,800
22,575
26,850
23,250
24,600
66,675
22,350
17,625
34,950
525
5,625
34,950
239,250
31,575
3,375,750
6,344,350
505,297

12,375
337,500
3,000
750
22,350
80,520
21,375
17,475
131,775
450
18,300
1,500
180,000
19,725
693,975
41,850
2,214,450
4,500
507,150
10,050
23,775
6,450,825
482,475
29,850
138,540
2,652,450
1,538,700
182,025
292,950
550,950

11,850
55,650
300,600
150
252,125
48,842
18,900
12,000
14,325
95,325
2,925
94,575
7,875
EM/AUGUST 1979
Date
 6/26
 6/29
 6/26

 6/29
 6/22
 6/29
 6/22
 6/7
 6/19
 6/29.
 6/27
 6/27
 6/26
 6/26
 6/27
 6/28
 6/28
 6/28
 6/28
 6/26
 6/28
 6/29
 6/27
 6/12
 6/7
 6/4
 6/12
 6/25
 6/27
 6/25
 6/29
 6/29
 6/25

 6/27
 6/8
 6/25
 6/4
 6/6
 6/27
 6/4
 6/19
 6/20
 6/8
 6/29
 6/19
 6/19
 6/25
 6/12
 6/7
 6/8
 6/8
 6/4
 6/8
 6/14
 6/8
 6/25
 6/25
 6/25
 6/26
 6/26
 6/26
 6/26
 6/26

 6/7
 6/7
 6/26
 6/12
 6/12
 6/12
 6/20
 6/20
 6/7
 6/7
 6/7
 6/29
 6/20
 21

-------
                                         FEDERAL   REGISTER
May 23,1979 — Rules: Grants; State and local
assistance: Water quality planning,' management
and implementation. Proposed Rules: Air qua-
lity implementation plans; approval and promul-
gation;  various States, etc.: Montana.  Texas.
Air quality implementation plans;  delayed com-
pliance  orders:  Connecticut  (2  documents).
Kentucky. Notices:  Air pollution; ambient air
monitoring  reference and equivalent methods
applications,  etc.:  Model  8850 Fluorescent
Sulfur  Dioxide Analyzer Pesticide  applicator
certification  and  interim  certification;  State
plans: North  Dakota.  Pesticides; experimental
use permit applications:  1-(4)Chlorophenoxy)-
3,3-dimethyl-1-(1W-1,2,4-trizol-1-yl)-2-butanone.
Chlorothiophus. Water pollution  control: Data
collection; schedule of surveys. May 24,1979 —
Proposed  Rules: Air quality  implementation
plans;   approval  and  promulgation;  various
States, etc.: California (3 documents), Connecti-
cut, Tennesee, Washington. Notices: Meetings:
Science Advisory Board. Radioactive contamina-
tion from specified foreign nuclear detonations.
Federal  responses; multiagency  memorandum
of understanding. May 25, 1979  - Rules: Air
quality  control regions;  criteria  and control
techniques:  Pennsylvania   attainment  status
designations;  hearings. Air quality implementa-
tion plans; delayed compliance orders: Maryland.
Proposed  Rules: Air quality  implementation
plans;   approval  and  promulgation;  various
States, etc.: Minnesota. Ohio. Air quality imple-
mentation  plans; delayed  compliance orders:
Kansas. Notices:  Air  quality implementation
plans; approval and promulgation: Prevention of
significant air quality deterioration (PSD); peti-
tions for review (2 documents). Environmental
statements; availability, etc.: Agency statements;
weekly receipts. Meetings: State FIFRA Issues
Research  and  Evaluation  Group. Pesticides;
experimental  use  permit  applications:  Agro-
bacterium radiobacter, etc. Toxic and hazardous
substances control:  Premanufacturing  notifi-
cation  requirements  and  review procedures;
interim  policy  statement; review by  Executive
Office of the  President. May -29, 1979 — Pro-
posed Rules: Air quality implementation plans;
approval and  promulgation;  various  States,
etc.: Maine. Rhode Island. Air quality implemen-
tation plans; delayed compliance orders: Kansas.
Notices:  Air   quality  implementation   plans;
approval and promulgation:  Fall  River, Mass.;
sewage sludge incinerator; PSD permit. Improv-
ing Government regulations.  Meetings: Innova-
tive  and  alternative  technology  assessment
manual.  Scientific Advisory Board.  May  30,
1979  — Proposed  Rules:  Noise abatement
programs: Transportation  equipment;  interstate
rail carriers; extension of time. May 31,1979 —
Rules: Air quality implementation  plans; delayed
compliance orders: Nebraska. Toxic substances:
Polychlorinated  biphenyls;  exemptions  from
processing  and distribution in  commerce pro-
hibitions; procedural  rules.  Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls; manufacturing, processing, distribution
in commerce,  and use prohibitions.  Proposed
Rules:  Air  pollutants,  hazardous;  National
emission standards, etc.:  "Commenced"; defi-
nition.  Air  quality control regions; criteria and
control  techniques: Attainment status designa-
tions; Ohio. Air quality implementation  plans;
delayed  compliance  orders:  Alabama.  Iowa.
Kansas.  North  Dakota. West Virginia.  Toxic
Substances: Chlorofluoroalkanes,  fully halogen-
22
ated; inkless fingerprinting systems exemption.
Polychlorinated biphenyls; chemical waste land-
fill criteria.  Polychlorinated biphenyls, importa-
tion and manufacture; exemption petitions and
hearing. Notices: Water pollution; discharge of
pollutants: Maryland. June 1,1979 — Proposed
Rules: Water pollution control: Consolidated.
permit regulations and  underground  injection
control regulations; hearings. Notices: Meet-
ings: Science Advisory Board. Toxic and hazar-
dous  substances control: TSCA Interagency
Testing Committee report to  EPA; priority list
for chemical substances testing. June 4,1979 —
Rules: Air quality implementation plans;  ap-
proval and  promulgation; various  States,  etc.:
New Jersey.  Pennsylvania.  Proposed  Rules:
Air quality implementation plans; approval and
promulgation;  various  States,  etc.:  Arizona.
Water pollution control: Judicial review under
the Clean  Water Act — forum  shopping. No-
tices: Air quality  criteria: Ozone and  photo-
chemical oxidants; policy clarification. Meetings:
State-FIFRA  Issues Research and Evaluation
Group. Water pollution control; safe drinking
water; public  water systems designations: New
Jersey. June 5, 1979  —  Proposed  Rules:
Air quality implementation plans; approval and
promulgation;  various  States, etc.: Massachu-
setts. Air quality  implementation  plans; delayed
compliance orders: Ohio (2  documents).  No-
tices: Air programs; fuel and  fuel additives:
Methylcyclopentadienyl  manganese tricarbonyl-
(MMT); suspension. Environmental statements;
availability,  etc.:   Agency statements, weekly
receipts.  Pesticides; experimental use  permit
applications:   Bacillus  thuringiensis  Berliner.
June 6, 1979  — Notices: Air pollution control,
new motor vehicles and engines: Diesel engine
technology; 1981  NOx emission standard; waiver
applications; hearing. June 7, 1979 —  Rules:
Air quality implementation plans; approval and
promulgation;  various States,  etc.: Tennessee.
Air quality implementation plans; delayed com-
pliance orders:  Utah.  Washington.  Pesticide
programs:  Human use  pesticides; exemption
from FIFRA;  notification to Agriculture Secre-
tary. Water pollution control: National  pollutant
discharge elimination system (NPDES); revision.
Proposed  Rules: Air  quality implementation
plans;  delayed compliance orders:  Kentucky.
Minnesota. Texas. Notices:  Air quality stand-
ards:  Summit County,  Ohio;  nonattainment
designation for sulfur dioxide; inquiry. Meetings:
State-FIFRA  Issues Research and Evaluation
Group. Pesticide  registration, cancellation, etc.:
Amitraz. Kabat tobacco protector. Norflurazon.
3,5,6-trichloro-2-pynidinyloxyacetic acid.  Pest-
icides; tolerances in animal feeds and  human
food:  BASF Wyandotte Corp., et al. Pesticides;
tolerances in  animal feeds and human food:
ICI Americas, Inc., et al. June 8,  1979 — Rules:
Air programs; fuel and fuel additives: Lead
phase-down standard. Air quality implementa-
tion plans; approval and promulgation; various
States, etc.:  South   Dakota.  Improving Go-
vernment regulations: Regulatory  agenda.
Notices:  Environmental statements; availability,
etc.:   Agency statements,  weekly  receipts.
Pesticide enforcement policy statements (PEPS);
recission.  Pesticides;   emergency  exemption
applications:  Dinoseb.   Pesticides; temporary
tolerances:  Ehtephon. June 11,1979 — Rules:
Air pollution; standards  of performance for new
stationary sources: Electric utility steam genera-
ting units.  Proposed  Rules: Air quality imple-
mentation  plans; approval  and  promulgation;
various States, etc.: Arizona. Delaware. Pennsyl-
vania.  Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation  Control
Act of 1978; implementation, inquiry. Notices:
Air pollution; ambient air monitoring reference
and equivalent  methods  applications,  etc.:
Model 8310 Carbon Monoxide Analyzer. Monitor
Labs Model 8450 Sulfur Monitor. Air pollution
control: Clean Air Act; Federal assistance limita-
tions. Meetings:  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide  Act Scientific Advisory Panel.
Pesticides;  emergency exemption applications:
Triforine  (2 documents).  June  12, 1979  —
Rules:  Air  quality implementation  plans;  ap-
proval, and promulgation; various States, etc.:
Alabama; correction.  Pennsylvania. Air quality
implementation plans; delayed  compliance or-
ders: Connecticut. Ohio (2 documents). Pro-
posed  Rules: Air quality implementation plans;
approval and promulgation;  various  States,
etc.: Ohio. Pennsylvania.  Virginia.  Notices:
Grants,  State and local assistance:  Resource
recovery project  development; President's
urban policy class deviation. Pesticide registra-
tion, cancellation,  etc.:  Permethrin  Technical.
Pounce Technical. Pesticides;  emergency  ex-
emption  applications:  Acephate.  Permethrin.
June 13,1979 — Rules: Air quality implementa-
tion plans; delayed compliance orders: Pennsyl-
vania. Proposed Rules: Air quality implementa-
tion plans;  approval and promulgation;  various
States, etc.: California. Air quality implementa-
tion plans;  delayed compliance  orders: New
Jersey.  Pennsylvania. Notices:  Air  quality
implementation  plans; approval  and  promul-
gation: Detroit Lime Co.; prevention of signifi-
cant air quality deterioration (PSD); final deter-
mination.   Pesticides,  emergency   exemption
applications:  (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-o1,  etc.; cor-
rection. Pesticides, experimental use  permit
applications: Bifenox,  Ethephon  etc.  N-tetra-
decyl formate etc. June 14, 1979 —  Proposed
Rules:   Permit programs, consolidated. Toxic
substances: Chlorofluorocarbons; essential  use
exemption for mold release agents. Water pol-
lution control; National  discharge  elimination
syste.n  and  State  program elements:  Toxic
pollutant discharge control  improvement. No-
tices: Air pollution; standards of performance
for  new stationary sources: Glass manufactur-
ing  plants. Permit programs, consolidated; draft
application  forms.  Pesticides; temporary toler-
ances:     2-Chloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-N-
(1-methylathyl) acetamide. Pesticides; tolerances
in animal feeds and human food: ICI Americas
Inc.  Toxic  and hazardous  substances control:
Premanufacture notices receipts. Water pollu-
tion  control: Manganese; alternate testing pro-
cedure. June 15, 1979 —  See also Interagency
Regulatory  Liaison Agency for document relat-
ing to the supplemental agreement of the Group.
Rules:  Water pollution  control;  National dis-
charge  elimination  system  and State program
elements:  Secondary  treatment  requirements
modification;  discharges  into  marine  waters.
Proposed  Rules: Air pollution; standards of
performance for new stationary sources: Glass
manufacturing plants.  Air  pollution control,
new motor  vehicles and  engines: Heavy-duty
engines; 1983 and later.  Air programs;  assess-
ment and collection of  noncompliance penalties;
corrections  and republication of appendix.

                       EM/AUGUST 1979

-------
                                          	
C      ENVIRONMEINTTAL IMPACT  STATEMENTS
 Sponsoring Agency,
 Project Number,
 Type of EIS

 Housing & Urban Development
 79-027-1015
 Draft Supplement

 Corps of Engineers
 79-010-100
 (Draft)

Corps of Engineers
78-043-115
(Final)
Corps of Engineers
79-014-152
(Draft)
Corps of Engineers
79-021-126
(Draft)

Housing and Urban
Development
79-012-1024
(Final)
Housing and Urban
Development
79-003-1024
(Final)

Housing and Urban
Development
79-027-1015
(Final Supplement)  ,

Govermerjt Services
Administration
78-020-1103
(Final)
         Project Location

          Montgomery County,
          Dayton, OH
          Penn,, W. Va., Ohio,
          Ky., Ind., and III.
         Ashtabula County,
         OH
      Description

Acquisition  and disposition  for
Newfields New Community
Operation  and maintenance of
locks and  dams on Ohio River.
Dredging navigation channel.

U.S.  Steel  lakefront  plant, east
of Conneaut
         Hancock and Rush
         Counties, IN
          Sheboygan Harbor,
          Wl
          Eagan, Dakota
          County, MN
          Eagan, Dakota
          County, MN
          Montgomery County,
          Dayton, OH
          Detroit, Ml
Flood control, water supply, water
storage, and recreational facilities
on Big Blue River
Operation and maintenance dredg-
ing
Lexington South,  planned unit
development
Blackhawk  Park,  planned unit
development
    Summary
    of Comments

Impacts should be measured against
present conditions, not against original
plan. Mass transit should be discussed.

Reservations regarding adverse  water
quality impacts


Most concerns satisfactorily addressed
except for (1) use of new far field model
to  simulate worst case water quality
conditions in Lake Erie (2) evaluation of
locating offsite solid waste disposal
(3) effect of emissions on vegetation,
soil, and visibility.

Concerns regarding wastewater  treat-
ment  and  associated water quality
aspects of  project.  Possible adverse
impacts on wetlands.

Method of dredging and disposal inade-
quate, due to  polluted  bottom sedi-
ments. Additional sampling to be done.

No major objections.
No major objections
Comment
Date
Rating

   5/23
   LO-2
Acquisition  and disposition  for   No major objections
Newfields New Community
                              Cargo inspection facility
                            Lack of noise analysis
                            and definite plans for mitigation
 Housing and Urban
 Development
 78-082-1021
 (Draft)
    CODE:
                          Hoffman Estates, IL
                              Poplar Hills housing development    Concerns regarding health and safety
                                                           impacts of adjacent landfill, adequacy
                                                           of wastewater treatment facility, long
                                                           range availability  of    groundwater
                                                           supply
LO - Lack of objections or minor changes suggested.
ER - Environment reservations on certain aspects of project; suggest preliminary determination of impact.
 2 - Insufficient information, EPA cannot fully assess project but can make further study of modifications or alternatives.
                        NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATIONS
   5/23
   ER-2

   5/29
   Draft ER-3
   6/7
   ER-2
   6/15
   EU-2
   6/21
   Draft LO-1
  6/21
  Draft LO-1
                                 6/21
                                 Draft LO-2
                                 6/25
                                 Draft ER-2
                                                             6/25
                                                             ER-2
     •  FS  Services  Inc., Albany IL;
     hydrocarbons.
     • Lissner Corp., Chicago,  IL; par-
     ticulates.
     •  ALCOA,  Cleveland,  OH;  par-
     ticulates
     • Barmet Industries, Uhrichsville,
     OH; partculates
                           •Cleveland  Electric Illuminating
                           Co., Cleveland, OH; particulates.
                           • Watervliet, Ml; particulates.
                           • Shell Oil  Co.,  Harristown,  IL;
                           hydrocarbons.
                           • Texaco Inc.,  Lawernceville, IL;
                           hydrocarbons.
                                    A  Notice of Violation 'is  .an  official
                                   warning from the U.S. EPS that source
                                   is not complying with existing air pollution
                                   control regulations. The polluter  has 30
                                   days from  the notification date  to ne-
                                   gotiate a compliance schedule  before
                                   EPA  can issue a Compliance Order or
                                   seek civil criminal actions.
   EM/AUGUST 1979
                                                                                                                23

-------
 AUGUSTS-?
 ERIC - TECHNOLOGY TRANS-
 FER  SEMINAR,  sponsored by
 EPA,  Office  of  Research and
 Development.  "Innovative and
 Alternative    Technology
 Assessment." Atlanta, GA. All-
 day affair, limited to 300 people.
 Qontact D.  Lussier, (513) 684-
 7394.
  AUGUST 9-10
  ERIC - TECHNOLOGY TRANS-
  FER SEMINAR, sponsored  by
  EPA, Office  of Research  and
  Development.  "Innovative  and
  Alternative    Technology
  Assessment." Boston, MA. At
  the Boston Park Plaza Hotel. All-
  day affair, limited to 300  people.
  Contact  D.  Lussier, (513) 684-
  7394.
           AUGUST 13-17
           ENVIROMENTAL  EDUCATION.
           To  present ecological  concepts
           leading to an understanding  of
           wise enviromental practices,
           receive first-hand  experience  in
           soils study, terrestrial and aquatic
           ecosystems,  fish and  game
           management.   At   Silver  Lake
           College, Manitowoc, Wisconsin.
           Contact Edward Ehlert, 1115 N.
           8th  St., Manitowoc,  Wiscon-
           sin, 54220. (414) 684-3144..
           AUGUST 28-30
           WASTEWATER   TREATMENT
           FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES, an
           EPA technology transfer seminar.
           Latest information by experts in
           the field on plans, design,  and
           management  of  wastewater
           treatment facilities. No fee. In-
           dianapolis, IN.  At  the Hyatt
           Regency  Hotel.  Contact Marti
           Velasco, U.S. EPA  Region V,
           Water Division, 230 S. Dearborn
           St., Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353-
           2314.
THE BEST INFORMED PEOPLE
IN ENVIRONMENTAL CIRCLES
READ PPP FROM A TO Z

   Besides Environment  Midwest
and a tax  refund from  Uncle
Sam, the most awaited  piece of
mail  for  thousands  of  en-
visonmentalists throughout Mid-
west is the PPP. Published twice
a month by EPA Region V Public
Affairs Office, the Public  Par-
ticipation Printout (PPP) is a very
unassuming  publication. A tip
sheet, in fact. But it has more
nuts-and-bolts information  on
environmental  goings-on  than
publications ten times its size, in
the PPP  you'll find listed  con-
ferences,  workshops, seminars,
meeting,  public  hearings  ,and
special events. Plus information
on the latest EPA brochures and
regulations. So don't be left out
of things environmental. For your
personal free copy of the PPP,
write to Leah. Wilson, Office of
Public Affairs, U.S. EPA Region
V, 230 S. Dearborn St., Chicago,
IL 60604.  She'll  put  you on a
mailing list quicker than you can
sayNPDES.
   rxEPA
                         •A- U.S. Government Printing Office: 1978

                                           650-027/N0.2
             THIRD CLASS MAIL
           POSTAGE 8 FEES PAID
                  EPA
              PERMIT NO. G-35
 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Region V
Public Affairs Office
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
Return this sheet if you do NOT wish to receive this material, or if a
change of address  is  needed. (Indicate changej,;i4r).cluding zip code.)

-------