Lessons Learned
from Natural Gas STAR Partners
/
                                         A
                               NaturalGasf\
                               EPA POLLUTION PREVENTER '
                                       /XX\
 Reducing Emissions  When  Taking
 Compressors  Off-Line
 Executive Summary

 Compressors are used throughout the natural gas industry
 to move natural gas from production and processing sites
 to  customer distribution systems.   Compressors must
 periodically be taken off-line for maintenance, operational
 stand-by, or emergency shut down testing, and as a result,
 methane may  be released to  the  atmosphere  from  a
 number of sources. When compressor units are shut down,
 typically the high  pressure  gas remaining within  the
 compressors  and  associated piping between  isolation
 valves is vented to the atmosphere ('blowdown')  or to a
 flare. In addition to blowdown emissions, a depressurized
 system may continue to leak gas from faulty or improperly
 sealed unit isolation valves.

 Natural  Gas STAR Partners have  found that simple
 changes  in  operating practices and in  the  design of
 blowdown systems  can  save money and significantly
 reduce methane emissions by keeping  systems fully or
 partially  pressurized   during  shutdown.   Though
 pressurized  systems  may also leak from the  closed
blowdown valve and  from reciprocating compressor rod
packing, total emissions can be significantly reduced. Four
options for reducing emissions when taking compressors
off-line are discussed in this paper. These include:

 * Keeping compressors pressurized when off-line.

 * Connecting  blowdown vent lines to the  fuel gas
    system and recovering all, or a portion, of the vented
    gas to the fuel gas system.

 * Installing static seals on compressor rod packing.

 * Installing ejectors  on  compressor blowdown vent
    lines.

Keeping  compressors fully  pressurized when  off-line
achieves immediate payback—there are no capital costs
and emissions are avoided by reducing the net leakage
rate. Routing blowdown vent lines to the fuel gas  system
or  to a lower pressure gas line reduces fuel costs  for the
compressor or other  facility  equipment,  in  addition to

Method for Volume of
Reducing Natural Natural Gas
Economic and Environmental Benefits
Value of Natural Gas Savings ($)
Implementation
rnct f*A
Gas Losses Savings (Mcf) ~w" v-lv


Option 1. Keep
1 compressor at pipeline 3,800
pressure2
Option 2. Keep
1 compressor pressurized _ ...
and route gas to fuel '
svstem2
$3 per Mcf $5 per Mcf $7 per Mcf


$11,400 $19,000 $26,600 $0


$15,300 $25,500 $35,700 $2,040


Payback1 (months)

$3 oer Mcf $5 per $7 per
$3 per Met Mcf Mcf


Immediate Immediate Immediate


2 1 1

Option 3. Keep
compressor pressurized
and install static seal2
Option 4. Install
1 Ejector.3
1 10 percent discount rate. 2
blowdown valves.
5,000
780
$15,000
$2,340
Incremental savings for peak load compressors
$25,000
$3,900
$35,000
$5,460
$4,900
$11,644
3 Assumes 1 5 Mcf per blowdown and 52 blowdowns per year
4
60
3
36
2
26
does not include capturing leakage from unit or

-------
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
avoiding  blowdown emissions.   Static seals installed on
compression rods eliminate gas leaking back through the
rod packing  while a  compressor  is shutdown  under
pressure. An ejector uses the discharge of an  adjacent
compressor as motive to  pump  blowdown or leaked gas
from  a  shut down compressor into the suction  of an
operating compressor or  a fuel gas system.  Benefits of
these  practices include fewer bulk gas releases, lower leak
rates, and lower fuel costs, with a payback in most cases of
less than a year.

Technology Background

Compressors used throughout the natural gas system are
cycled on- and off-line to meet fluctuating demand for gas.
Maintenance  and  emergency  shut  down   are   other
occasions when compressors are taken off-line.  Standard
practice is to blow down or vent the high pressure gas left
in the compressor when  it is taken off-line.   While the
compressor is depressurized, leakage can continue from
the unit isolation valves, which are estimated to leak at an
average rate of 1.4 Mcf/hour.   When a compressor is fully
pressurized, methane can leak from the closed blowdown
valve  and the compressor rod packings.  Per Exhibit 1, this
leakage rate from pressurized compressors is estimated to
           be smaller, totaling 0.45 Mcf/hour versus 1.4 Mcf/hour for
           a depressurized system.

           The number of times a compressor is taken  off-line for
           normal operations depends on its operating mode.  Some
           compressors   are  designated   as   base  load;   these
           compressors are operated most of the time,  and might be
           taken  off-line  only a few times per year.  Down time for
           base load compressors averages 500 hours per year. Other
           compressors operate for peak load service, coming on line
           as demand increases and additional pipeline volumes are
           required.  These units drop off the system (shut down) as
           market demand decreases. Peak  load compressors may be
           operated for approximately 4000  hours total (less than 50
           percent of the year), but cycling on- and off-line as many as
           40 times per year.

           The  ratio  of base  load  compressors  to  peak  load
           compressors  varies widely  among pipeline  operators
           because   of   different   operating   strategies,  system
           configurations, and markets.   On  some  pipelines, 40
           percent  of the compressors  might  be base  loaded; on
           others, 75 percent might operate  as base load.  Regardless
           of the  operating mode, significant emission savings can be
           gained by  modifying  operating practices  and  facility
           designs to minimize the amount of natural gas  emitted
                                      Exhibit 1:  Compressor Diagram
                   Blowdown Scenario
                      Compressor
                      Rod Packing
                   Pressurized Scenario
4
D
\
Blowdown V
L-] (Open)

epressurized
                                                                Unit Valve
                                                                (closed-leak)
                        Compressor
                        Rod Packing
                        (leak)
                                                  Blowdown Valve
                                                  (Closed-leak)
                                                                Unit Valve
                                                                (closed)
Pressurized
                                Leaks
                                - Unit Valves
                                  (1.4 Mcf/hour)
                                - Blowdown
                                  (15 Mcf/event)
Leaks
 - Blowdown Valves
  (0.15 Mcf/hour)
 - Compressor Rod
  Packing
  (4 rods per
  compressor,
  0.30 Mcf/hour)
 - Blowdown
  (will vary according
  to control option)
Source: 1999 PRCI Final Re

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
during down periods.

The largest source of methane emissions associated with
taking compressors  off-line  is  from depressurizing the
system  by venting  the  gas that  remains within  the
compressor and the piping associated with the compressor.
The gas volume released  during a compressor blow down
depends  on several factors  including  the  size  of the
compressor,  the pipeline  pressure, and  the pipe volume
contained between  unit isolation  valves. On average,  a
single blowdown will release  approximately 15 thousand
standard cubic feet (Mcf) of gas to the atmosphere.

It should be noted that all options discussed in this paper
require blowdown of a compressor before it can be taken on
-line again. The  main difference between the baseline
scenario (blowing the compressor down on shutdown and
maintaining it depressurized)  and the options presented is
the timing  of the   blowdown and the  volume  of the
blowdown (for example, if blowdown gas is routed to the
fuel system).

Unit  isolation  valves  are another  source  of  methane
emissions from off-line  depressurized compressors.  Large
unit valves are used to isolate  the  compressor from the
pipeline and can leak significant  amounts of methane.
Unit valves have acceptable ranges of leakage specified by
design tolerances for this type  of valve.  Unit isolation
valves  are periodically maintained to reduce leakage, but
the limited accessibility  of  such  valves  can  result  in
increased  leakage between scheduled  maintenance.  A
typical leak rate for unit valves is 1.4 Mcf per hour.

If the compressor  is  kept  pressurized  while  off-line,
emissions from compressor rod packings  and blowdown
valves  can be observed.  Seals on  compressor piston rods
will leak  during normal operations, but this  leakage
increases approximately fifty percent (to about 75  scfh per
rod, or 0.3 Mcf/ hour, per four-cylinder compressor) when a
compressor is  idle with a fully pressurized suction line.
Leaks occur through gaps between the seal rings and their
support cups, which are closed by  the dynamic movement
          Methane Content of Natural Gas
     The average methane content of natural gas varies by natural gas
     industry sector. The Natural Gas STAR Program assumes the
     following methane content of natural gas when estimating
     Production

     Processing

     Transmission and Distribution
79%

87%

94%
of the piston rod and lubricating oil (see EPA's Lessons
Learned: Reducing Methane Emissions from Compressor
Rod Packing).  Vent and flare system valves can also leak
from pressurized systems at a rate of 150 scfh.

Natural Gas STAR Partners have  significantly reduced
methane emissions  from compressors  taken off-line by
implementing  changes  in  maintenance  and  operating
procedures as well as installing new equipment.  Following
are some  of the practices  recommended by Natural Gas
Star Partners.

1. Maintain  pipeline pressure  on  the  compressor
during shutdown.  As shown in Exhibit 1, leakage from
the compressor seal  and  closed  blowdown valve will
increase for  the pressurized system, but is still less than
anticipated  leakage  at the unit isolation  valve  for  a
depressurized system.   Partners report  that total fugitive
gas emissions  will be reduced by as much as 68 percent,
compared  to leakage that would occur through the unit
valve if the compressor were offline and depressurized, to
approximately  0.45   Mcf/  hour   for  a  pressurized
compressor.

2. Keep the  compressor  at fuel gas pressure and
connect   to  the fuel gas system.   Connecting  the
blowdown vent  or flare lines to the fuel  gas system allows
the gas that is purged when taking a compressor off-line to
be routed to a  useful  outlet.  The pressure of an off-line
compressor equalizes to fuel line gas pressure  (typically
100-150 pounds per  square inch,  psi).   At the  lower
pressure,  total leakage from the compressor  system is
reduced by more than 90 percent, compared to leakage
that would occur through the unit valve if the compressor
were offline and depressurized,  to  approximately  0.125
Mcf/hour  from  the  compressor  rod packing.   Leakage
across  the unit valves into  the compressor  continues to
feed the fuel system via the vent connection, rather than
vent to the atmosphere or flare in the fully depressurized
system.

3. Keep  the  compressor at pipeline  pressure and
install a  static seal on the compressor rods. A static
seal on the  compressor rods can eliminate  rod packing
leaks during shutdown periods with the compressor still
pressurized.   A static seal is installed  on each rod shaft
outside the conventional packing. An automatic controller
activates when the compressor is shutdown to wedge a gas
-tight seal around the  shaft; the controller deactivates the
seal on start-up.  With this  equipment  installed, leakage
will only occur from the closed blowdown valve at  about
0.15 Mcf/h with the system at high pressure.  The new

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
leakage rate would represent a reduction of 89% of the
emissions that would take place if the compressor were to
be kept off-line and depressurized.

4.  Install Ejector. An ejector is a venturi nozzle that uses
high-pressure gas as motive fluid to draw suction on  a
lower  pressure  gas   source,   discharging  into  an
intermediate  pressure  gas  stream. The  ejector  can be
installed on vent connections up  and down stream of  a
partly  closed valve, or between the discharge and suction
of a compressor  which creates  the necessary pressure
differential. The captured gas and the motive gas are then
routed to compressor suction or fuel gas system.

Economic and Environmental Benefits

Natural  Gas  STAR Partners  can achieve substantial
environmental and  economic benefits by taking  simple
steps  to  avoid  blowing  down,  or   depressurizing,
compressors to the atmosphere when a shut down occurs.
These benefits include:

 *  Fewer Bulk Gas  Releases: by routing compressor
     blowdown gas to the fuel gas system, operators can
     significantly reduce the volume of emissions  while
     recovering a useful product. Similar results can be
     achieved  by installing an ejector  to capture  the
     blowdown gas and route it to a useful outlet.

 *  Lower Leak Rates: maintaining compressors fully
     pressurized can  avoid  significant leaks  across  the
     unit valves of 475  Mcf per year for  base  load units
     and 3,800 Mcf per year for peak  load  units (see
     Exhibit 2).   The installation of ejectors  and  static
     seals on the compressor rods when the unit is off-line
     will also  reduce the amount of methane  leaking to
     atmosphere.

 *  Lower Fuel Costs: routing compressor  gas to the
     fuel system utilizes methane that would otherwise be
     vented or  flared.   This  reduces   fuel  costs and
     increases the volume of gas available  for sale or use.

Decision Process

When taking compressors off-line, operators can easily and
cost-effectively reduce  methane emissions  by following
these steps:

Step 1: Identify blowdown alternatives.
Four  options  previously described are available  for
Decision Steps for Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors
Off-Line:
1.  Identify blowdown alternatives.
2.  Calculate quantity and value of methane emissions from the baseline
   (depressurized) scenario.
3.  Calculate the cost and savings of alternatives.
4.  Conduct economic analysis.
 reducing methane emissions when taking compressors off-
 line. The feasibility and cost of implementing each option,
 either singly or in  combination, must be considered by
 operators  when  modifications  to  compressor  shut  down
 procedures are developed.

   *  Option 1:   Maintain  pipeline pressure on the
      compressor during shutdown.

   *  Option 2:  Route high pressure pipeline gas to
      fuel  while keeping the compressor at  fuel gas
      pressure.

   *  Option 3:  Keep compressors pressurized and
      install a static seal on compressor rods.

   *  Option  4:   Install  Ejector  to  route  gas to
      compressor suction or fuel gas system

 A  prudent   operating  practice  is  to  avoid  fully
 depressurizing compressors until they are to be taken on-
 line  again.   Option 3  (installing  static  seals)  provides
 added gas savings  when  used together  with Option  1
 (maintaining the compressor  at  pipeline  pressure) by
 limiting fugitive gas  emissions  when  maintaining  a
 pressurized system.  Option 4, install ejector, will recover
 blowdown  gas that would otherwise have been vented and
 allow the  operator  to  direct  it to  a  useful outlet. In
 addition, Option 4 can capture leakage and route it to  a
 useful outlet,  making  it possible to  be implemented in
 combination with any of the other options.

 Step 2: Calculate quantity and value of methane
 emissions from the baseline (depressurized) scenario.

 The  total  methane emissions from off-line,  depressurized
 compressors is the  sum of the losses  from venting  the
 compressor and associated piping and  the losses across the
 unit valves for  the period  of time the  compressor is
 depressurized. Key inputs for calculating the  total  losses
 per compressor per year include:

   *  The number of blowdowns per year (B).

   *  The  pressurized compressor's volume  between unit

-------
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
     isolation valves (V).  The volume of gas vented per
     blowdown depends on the compressor cavity volume,
     the suction  and discharge bottles and piping volume
     between isolation valves, and the pressure.  This can
     be calculated directly using Henry's  Law (volume is
     inversely proportional to pressure, or PiVi = P2V2).
     An average of 15 Mcf per blowdown is accepted as a
     default emissions factor by the Natural Gas STAR
     Program.

  *  The duration of the shut-down periods (T).

  *  The leakage rate at the unit valves (U). Unit valve
     leaks can be measured at the blowdown vent using
     hand-held measuring devices.  Leak rates generally
     increase since the last maintenance of the valves.  A
     default value of 1,400 scfh is used in this analysis.

Total emissions  (TE) are calculated as: TE = B*V + T*U.
The total value (TV) or cost of these emissions is TE times
the price (P) of gas or TV = TE x P.

Most of this information is easily accessible from operating
records and nameplate specifications, or can be estimated.
Exhibit  2 presents two sample calculations of losses from
the baseline scenario versus Option 1, one for a base load
compressor and one from a peak load compressor.
               Step 3: Calculate the cost and savings of alternatives.
               The  costs  of  each   alternative  include  the   capital
               investment,  incremental  operations  and maintenance
               (O&M) cost, and the off-line leak rate associated with the
               option.  Some Partner-reported costs of each option are
               summarized below.

                 *  Option  1: Maintain pipeline  pressure  on  the
                    compressor during shutdown. This option has no
                    capital  or  O&M  costs.   When instituted,  leakage
                    occurs at the compressor rod packing (0.3 Mcf/h per
                    compressor) and at the blowdown valve (0.15 Mcf/h),
                    totaling  approximately  0.45  Mcf/h   when   the
                    compressor is fully pressurized.

                 *  Option  2:  Keep the  compressor  at fuel  gas
                    pressure and connect to  the fuel gas  system.
                    This option involves adding  piping  and valves to
                    bleed  gas  from   an  idle  compressor  into  the
                    compressor station's  fuel gas system or other  low
                    pressure sales  line. Facility modification costs range
                    between $1,470 and $2,600 per compressor. Major
                    determinants of cost are the size of the compressor,
                    the number of fittings, valves, and piping supports,
                    size  of piping, length  of piping,  and whether an
                    automatic analyzer is installed. After the pressure in
Exhibit 2:  Sample Calculations of Savings due to Implementation of Option 1 as Compared to Baseline
                         Scenario of Maintaining Compressor Fully Depressurized
  Assumptions:
                                                     Base Load
                                              Peak Load
  Hours off-line/year
  Unit valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Blowdown valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Rod packing leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Sample 1: Base Load Compressor
  Total Fugitive Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 1 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas

  Sample 2: Peak Load Compressor

  Total Fugitive Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 1 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas
               500
               1.4
               .15
               .30
: (500 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (500 hours x 0.45 Mcf/h)
: 475 Mcf/year
: 475 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
: $3,325 per year


: (4,000 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (4,000 hours x 0.45 Mcf/h)
: 3,800 Mcf/year
: 3,800 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
: $26,600 per year
4,000
 1.4
 .15
 .30

-------
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
     the  compressor  equilibrates  with  the  fuel  line
     pressure, leakage from compressor rod packings falls
     to about 50 scfh and from the blowdown valve  to
     about 75 scfh, totaling 0.125 Mcf/h.

 *  Option   3:  Keep  pressurized and  install  a
     positive static seal on compressor rods. While
     technically  feasible  and  compatible  with  either
     Option  1 or 2, Option 3 may not be cost-effective
     when used in conjunction with Option 2 (because leak
     rates  are  significantly  lower  when  floating the
     compressor at the lower  fuel line pressures).  Static
     seals cost about  $825 per rod, plus  $1,600  for an
     automatic  activation  controller for  the  entire
     compressor, totaling $4,900 per four-rod compressor.
     With leakage  from  the  compressor  rod packing
     virtually eliminated,  the only remaining leakage is
     from the blowdown valves, approximately 150 scfh.

 *  Option  4: Install  Ejector. Similar to  Option  3,
     Option 4 is technically feasible and compatible  with
     Options  1 and 2,  as the ejector can capture gas that
     leaks through valves. Option  4 may not be as  cost-
     effective when used with Option 2 (because leak rates
     are  significantly lower when floating the compressor
     at  lower  fuel line  pressures).  The  capital  and
     installation costs  of a typical venturi ejector are
                Nelson Price Indexes
                 In order to account for inflation in equipment and
                 operating & maintenance costs, Nelson-Farrar
                 Quarterly Cost Indexes (available in the first issue of
                 each quarter in the Oil and Gas Journal) are used to
                 update costs in the Lessons Learned documents.
                 The "Refinery Operation Index" is used to revise
                 operating costs while the "Machinery: Oilfield Itemized
                 Refining Cost Index" is used to update equipment
                 costs.
                 To use these indexes in the future, simply look up the
                 most current Nelson-Farrar index number, divide by
                 the February 2006 Nelson-Farrar index number, and,
                 finally multiply by the appropriate costs in the Lessons
                 Learned.
                    estimated to be $11,644.  In addition to the  ejector
                    itself,  capital  expenditures include ejector  block
                    valves,  piping  from  the  blowdown  vent  line
                    connections, and engineering design work to size the
                    nozzle and expander for the site.

               Exhibits 3a, 3b,  and 3c show  sample costs  and savings
               associated with these options.
    Exhibit 3a:  Sample Calculations of Savings due to Implementation of Option 2 as Compared to
                    Baseline Scenario of Maintaining Compressor Fully Depressurized
  Assumptions:
                                                     Base Load
                                              Peak Load
  Hours off-line/year
  Unit valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Blowdown valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Rod packing leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Sample 1: Base Load Compressor

  Total Fugitive Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 2 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas

  Sample 2: Peak Load Compressor

  Total Fugitive Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 2 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas
              500
              1.4
              .050
              .075
(500 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (500 hours x 0.125 Mcf/h)
638 Mcf/year
638 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
$4,466


(4,000 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (4,000 hours x 0.125 Mcf/h)
 5,100 Mcf/year
5,100 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
$35,700
4,000
 1.4
 .050
 .075

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking  Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
     Exhibit 3b: Sample Calculations of Savings due to Implementation of Option 3 as Compared to
                    Baseline Scenario of Maintaining Compressor Fully Depressurized
  Assumptions:
                                                      Base Load
                                                                                       Peak Load

  Hours off-line/year
  Unit valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Slowdown valve leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Rod packing leak rate (Mcf/h)
  Sample 1: Base Load Compressor

  Total Fugitive  Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 3 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas

  Sample 2: Peak Load Compressor

  Total Fugitive  Emissions Savings = Baseline
  Emissions - Option 3 Emissions

  Total Value of Saved Gas
                                                       500
                                                       1.4
                                                       .150
                                                        0
                                         (500 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (500 hours x 0.150 Mcf/h)
                                         625 Mcf/year
                                         625 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
                                         $4,375


                                         (4,000 hours x 1.4 Mcf/h) - (4,000 hours x 0.150 Mcf/h)
                                         5,000 Mcf/year
                                         5,000 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf
                                         $35,000
                                  4,000
                                   1.4
                                  .150
                                   0
 Exhibit 3c: Sample Calculations of Savings due to
            Implementation of Option 4
  Assumptions:
  Slowdowns per year

  Emissions per Slowdown

  Capital Cost
  Operating Costs
                                52

                                15 Mcf
                                $11,644

                                $1,575
                                780 Mcf / yr
                                = 780 Mcf/year x $7.00/Mcf

                                = $5,460
* Assumes 15 Mcf per blowdown and 52 blowdowns per year and that virtually all of
the gas is captured by the ejector. Does not include capture of leaked emissions from
blowdown or unit valve..
  Natural Gas Emissions Savings

  Total Value of Gas Saved
Step 4: Conduct economic analysis.
Once  the  quantity and value  of natural gas losses  and
methane emissions are  determined and the cost of each
alternative is  established,  an economic  analysis of the
emission mitigation options is conducted.  Simple payback
is  an industry  standard  economic analysis method in
which the first year costs  of  each option are compared
against the annual value of gas saved.
When maintaining pipeline pressure on compressor sets
(Option 1), the net emissions  savings are the difference
between  methane  emissions  from off-line leakage that
occurs  when  the compressor  is kept fully depressurized
and off-line leakage that occurs when the compressor is
kept fully pressurized (calculated in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 4 presents  the estimated savings of Option 1 and
the incremental savings from implementing Options 2 and/
or 3 in addition to Option  1.  Maintaining  the  system
under pressure while  the compressor is shutdown or  on
standby (Option 1) demonstrates an immediate payback
with no investment required.  Option 2, tying vent lines
into  a  low  pressure  gas pipeline  while  maintaining
pressure  on the compressor system during a shut down, is
economic for  both  base load and  peak load compressors,
but significantly more attractive for peak compressors.

For Option 3, the  incremental  gas savings for base load
compressors  require just  over  one year to recover  the
facility investment  but payback for peak load compressors
is less than one year.

Option 4 can  be implemented in combination with Options
1, 2, and 3 or individually. The cost-effectiveness of Option
4 will depend on the volume of gas vented per blowdown as

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
Exhibit 4: Economic Comparison of Options
_ . 1 Option 2 Option 3
I .. „ . . Keep Pressurized and Tie to Fuel Keep Pressurized and Install
Keep Pressurized _ <-.. ..- <- i
1 Gas Static Seal

1 Net Gas Savings (Mcf/yr)
Dollar Savings/yr1
1 Facilities Investment
Payback
1 IRR2
1 Assuming value of gas $7.00/Mcf
2 5 year life (not including annual O&M costs)
Base Peak Base Peak Base Peak
475 3,800 638 5,100 625 5,000
$3,325 $26,600 $4,466 $35,700 $4,375 $35,000
0 0 $2,040 $2,040 $4,900 $4,900
Immediate Immediate 6 months 1 months 14 months 2 months
>100% >100% 218% 1750% 85% 714%

well as the number of blowdowns per year. The economic
evaluation presented in Exhibit  4a assumes  15 Mcf per
blowdown and 52  blowdowns per year.  The  economic
evaluation does not account for additional gas  that can be
recovered from leakage through the blowdown valve or
unit valve.
         Exhibit 4a: Economic Evaluation
                    of Option 4
                                    Option 4
                                  Install Ejector
  Net Gas Savings
  (Mcf/yr)1

  Dollar Savings/yr2

  Facilities Investment

  Operating Costs

  Payback3

  IRR3
  780

 $5,460

 $11,644

 $1,575

26 months

  37%
1 Assuming 15 Mcf per blowdown and 52 blowdowns per year 2 Assuming value of gas
$7.00/Mcf 3 5 year life (not including annual O&M costs)
Implementation Tips

Listed below are tips that Natural Gas STAR Partners use
to evaluate  options and reduce emissions from  off-line
compressors:
*  Operators   generally   conduct   total   station
   maintenance turnarounds every 12  to  36 months,
   overhauling unit isolation valves and making major
   modifications such as fuel gas tie-ins.  Unit valves,
   blowdown valves, and compressor rod packing likely
   experience maximum leakage rates toward the end of
   the operating cycle between  turnarounds. Therefore,
   it  is   typically  more  cost-effective   to  make
   replacements during the next scheduled turnaround.

*  Safety is  a  priority  when designing and operating
   natural gas  facilities. Maintaining gas  pressure on
   idle compressors and valves causes increased leakage
   through the  equipment inside the compressor station,
   and  the  appropriate precautions  must be  taken
   within the facility for gas  detection, the potential
   energy  hazards  of  high  pressure  vessels,  and
   adequate  ventilation to  prevent  accumulation  of
   leaked gases.  Installing static seals on compressor
   rods and maintaining and selecting the  appropriate
   valves can minimize  this leakage, and, by extension,
   safety concerns.

*  Depressurizing off-line  compressors  to  fuel gas  is
   effective only where there is sufficient fuel demand to
   consume the gas at  the rate of unit isolation valve
   leakage (estimated 1.4 Mcf/h).

*  Appropriate valve selection  and maintenance of the
   seal  integrity of unit isolation valves can eliminate
   up to 90 percent of annual emissions from the typical
   shutdown and blowdown practice.  Repairs on these
   valves are expensive in terms of material and labor,
   as well as the gas emissions that result from the need

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
     to depressurize the  entire station  to access these
     valves.

Although the maintenance and repair cost of gas handling
equipment  to eliminate blow  down  emissions can  be
prohibitive  in terms of valve materials  and labor, when
combined with better operating routines, better facility
and  equipment design,  and  elimination of unnecessary
blow down practices, significant cash flow can be added to
the bottom line of  many operations  who have economic
incentives to reduce lost and unaccounted-for gas.

When  assessing  options  for  reducing  emissions  when
taking compressors off-line, the expected price of natural
gas influences decision-making.  Exhibit 5a  shows the
impact of gas price  on the economic analysis of Option 2,
keeping the  compressor  pressurized  and  routing  the
blowdown vent to the fuel gas system.
Exhibit 5c shows the impact of gas price on the economic
analysis of Option 4, install ejectors.
Exhibit 5a: Impact of Gas Price on Option 2: Keep
Compressor Pressurized and
Route Blowdown Gas to Fuel
$3/ Mcf
1 Value of Gas Saved $15,300
1 Payback Period (months) 2
Internal Rate of Return -,,-nn,
1 (IRR) 750%
Net Present Value ~
1 (1=10%) $50'871
$5/ Mcf $7/ Mcf
$25,500 $35,700
1 1
1,250% 1,750%
$86,022 $121,173
Exhibit 5b shows the impact of gas price on the economic
analysis of Option 3, keeping the compressors pressurized
and installing a static seal on the compressor rods.
Exhibit 5b: Impact of Gas Price on Option 3: Keep
Compressor Pressurized and Install Static Seals

Value of Gas Saved
Payback Period
(months)
Internal Rate of
1 Return (IRR)
Net Present Value
| (i=10%)
$3/ Mcf
$15,000
4
306%
$47,238
$5/ Mcf
$25,000
3
510%
$81,700
$7/ Mcf
$35,000
2
714%
$116,161

Exhibit 5c: Impact of Gas Price on Option 4:
Install Ejectors

Value of Gas Saved
Payback Period
(months)
Internal Rate of
1 Return (IRR)
Net Present Value
1 (i=10%)
$3/ Mcf
$2,340
60
0%
- $2,521
$5/ Mcf
$3,900
36
20%
$2,854
$7/ Mcf
$5,460
26
37%
$8,230
The impact of the gas price on the economic analysis of
Option  1  is not  shown  since no  capital investment is
required to  implement Option 1, making the payback
immediate regardless of gas price.

Lessons Learned

Partners will find that significant emissions  reductions
and  cost  saving  will  result  from  altering  routine
compressor blowdown  practices, and,  where  applicable,
from rerouting vented  gas. Savings accrue from retained
product or displacement of fuel gas. The principal lessons
learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners are:

  *  Avoid  depressurizing  to  atmosphere  whenever
     possible. Large immediate savings can be  realized at
     no cost by keeping off-line compressors pressurized
                                                           Case Study: An EPA Partner's Experience
                                                           With growing interest in identifying practical financial savings and
                                                           reducing gas losses, Company A investigated several strategies
                                                           to reduce leakage from its compressor rod packing.  During a
                                                           period when compressors were taken out of service, the company
                                                           tied  the compressor to the  fuel gas system.   At this lower
                                                           compressor cylinder pressure, the leakage through rod packing
                                                           cases and blowdown  valves was reduced considerably.   For
                                                           3,022 compressor cylinders (a total  of 577 compressor units)
                                                           operative 40 percent of the time, the total gas savings amounted
                                                           to a significant 1.58 Bcf/year.

-------
Reducing  Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
     during the majority of their time off-line.

  *  Educate field staff about the benefits of delaying or
     avoiding blowdowns.

  *  Determine if individual compressors operate in base
     or  peak  load.  Use  this  information to  conduct
     economic analyses of Options 2 and 3.

  *  Measure gas emissions from  blowdown valves  and
     individual  unit isolation valves,  as well as emissions
     from individual compressors to evaluate your actual
     economics of the alternatives presented.

  *  Where economic, develop  a schedule for retrofitting
     compressors with  fuel  gas  routing  systems  and
     installing compressor rod static seals.

  *  Record reductions at each compressor.

  *  Reductions in methane emissions  should be included
     in annual  reports submitted as part of the Natural
     Gas STAR Program.


References

Borders, Robert S. C. Lee Cook, personal contact.

Campbell, Alastair J. Bently Nevada Corporation, Houston, Texas. Optical
    Alignment of Reciprocating Compressors.

"Compressor  Shutdown Leakage." Pipeline & Gas  Journal,  December
    1985.

France Compressor Products. Mechanical Packing - Design and Theory of
    Operation, Bulletin 691.

Howard, T., R. Kantamaneni, G. Jones,  Indaco Air Quality Services, Inc.
    PRCI  Final Report. "Cost Effective Leak  Mitigation at Natural Gas
    Transmission Compressor Stations". August 1999.

Maholic, James. France Compressor Products, personal contact.

Minotti, Marcello. ENRON, personal contact.
Common Leak Detection and Measurement
Devices


  *  Infrared Camera

    -   Able to screen inaccessible equipment components

    -   Displays hydrocarbon emissions in a moving image using
        infrared properties of the hydrocarbons

  *  Electronic  Screening

    -   Equipped with catalytic oxidation and thermal conductivity
        sensors designed to detect certain gases

    —    Typically used on larger openings that cannot be
        screened by soaping.

  *  Acoustic Leak Detection

    —   High frequency acoustic detectors or ultrasonic leak
        detectors are two types of acoustic leak detectors

    -   Rely on acoustic signals  upstream and downstream of a
        possible  leak to determine if gas is escaping

  *  OVAs and  TVAs

    -   Organic Vapor Analyzers (OVAs) are flame ionization
        detectors which measure the concentration of organic
        vapors over a range of 9 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm)
        Toxic Vapor Analyzers (TVAs) combine both flame
        ionization detectors and photoionization detectors and can
        measure organic vapors at concentrations exceeding
        10,000 ppm
  *  Calibrated Bagging

    —   Used to measure mass emissions from equipment leaks.

    —   The leaking component is enclosed in a "bag" of known
        volume and a timer is used to determine the time to fill the
        bag

  *  Rotameters

    -   Used to measure extremely large leaks that would
        overwhelm other instruments.

    —   Ideal for open-ended lines and similar components where
        the entire flow can be channeled through the meter.

  *  High Volume Samplers

    —   Capture all of the emissions from a leaking component
        through a vacuum sampling hose to accurately quantify
        leak emissions rates.

    —   Sample measurements are corrected for the ambient
        hydrocarbon concentration, and mass leak rate  is
        calculated by multiplying the flow rate of the measured
        sample by the difference between the  ambient gas
        concentration and the gas concentration in the measured

                                                                    sample.

                                                                                                                   10

-------
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-Line (Cont'd)
§
          \
           Ul
           (3
  United States
  Environmental Protection Agency
  Air and Radiation (6202J)
  1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  Washington, DC 20460

  October 2006
  the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart W methods or those in other EPA regulations.
                                                                                           11

-------