-------
Table 4-5 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR
SAMPLE SET #5 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS
Parameter Design Operating Value
Kiln Temperature (°F)+ * 1775-1800
Kiln Solids Residence Time (min) * 120
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)+ * K019: 11.7
RCRA Blend,
Waste Burner #1: 5.5-6.0
RCRA Blend,
Waste Burner #2: 5.2-9.7
Kiln Rotational Speed (RPM) * 0.19-0.21
-••Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-1?
-------
Table 4-6
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR
SAMPLE SET 16
Untreated Waste
Detected BDAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILES
4, Benzene
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
42. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
4?. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226, Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenapthalene
57. Anthracene
65. Benzo(k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
80. Chrysene
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
108, Fluoranthene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
K019
Concentration
rag/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
4,100
<2,QQQ
5,600
<2,000
98,000
<10,000
<10,000
6,900
<2,000
44,000
2,500
<2,000
<10,000
<2,000
<10,000
330
<10
SNA
<10
90
22
66
RCRA Blend*
Concentration
tng/kg
(ppm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
110
67
<20
40
28
250
32
31
120
53
<100
Treated Wastg
Kiln Ash
icentrs
mg/kg
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
10
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an MBS Library data-
base of 42,000 compounds. The compound was not detected.
* Only one sample of RCRA Blend waste was taken. The results are repeated in each
sample set.
4-18
-------
Table 4-6 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR
SAMPLE SET #6 (Continued)
Untreated Waste
Treated Waste
K019 RCRA Blend* Kiln Ash
Concentration Concentration Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichloroenzene
Detected BOAT List Metal
andInorganic Constituenti
METALS
154. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
158. Cadmium
159. Chromium
160. Copper
161. Lead
163. Nickel
165. Silver
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
NA - Not Analyzed.
mg/kg
(ppm)
<50
88
390
<25
65
17
86
79
<6.0
<0.2
<0.9
0.62
5.3
3.6
3-5
6.0
<0.9
<2.0
8.4
<0.5
<5.0
NA
mg/kg
(ppm)
210
<100
<20
3,400
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
24
94
1.3
<0.3
40
165
27
8.8
<0.9
2.2
4,170
0.9
31
830
mg/kg
(ppm)
<2
<5
10
<2
<2
<2
<5
<5
9-6
2.3
11
2.2
141
,520
34
288
3.1
8.7
13
<0.47
4.7
92
Kiln Ash
TCLP
mg/L
(ppm)
< 0.06
<0.002
0.027
0.006
,092
.400
0.270
0.690
<0.009
<0.020
0.061
0,
2,
*0nly one sample of RCRA Blend waste was taken. The results are repeated in each
sample set.
4-19
-------
Table 4-6 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR
SAMPLE SET #6 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS
Parameter Design Operating Value
Kiln Temperature (°F)+ * 1775-1850
Kiln Solids Residence Time (min) * 120
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)+ * K019= 11-5
RCRA Blend,
Waste Burner #1: 5.2-5.8
RCRA Blend,
Waste Burner #2: 5.2-9.7
Kiln Rotational Speed (RPM) * 0.19-0.21
+Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-20
-------
Table 4-7
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #1
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILEg
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetraehloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
21. Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dlchloroethane
3%, Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
42. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226. Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenaphthaiene
52. Acenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65. Benzo{k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-ehloroethyl)ether
70, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
4,000
3,000
4,600
<200
2,200
93,000
< 1,000
< 1,000
7,300
<200
81,000
3,210
<200
< 1,000
<200
< 1,000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
280
<10
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
<20
<50
110
67
<20
40
PCB Blend*
rag /kg
(ppm)
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<10,000
<10,000
<2,000
41,000
<2,000
3,600
36,000
<10,000
16,000
<10,000
120
480
<250
400
<100
<100
<100
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
17.0
1.90
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
3.5
<2.0
<0.4
3-7
2.3
<0.4
4.4
<2.0
4.1
<2.0
<0.002
<0.002
1.22
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.079
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set,
-------
Table 4-7 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 11 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Consti tuents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
90. 2,4-Diehlorophenol
91. 2,6-Dichlorophenol
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexaehlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. Hexaehloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122. 1,4-Naphthoqu inone
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
152. 2,4,6-Triehlorophenol
K019
nig/kg
(ppm)
SNA
<10
<10
81
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
20
69
<50
120
170
<10
<25
61
21
<10
<10
76
100
<50
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
28
<20
250
32
<50
<50
31
<20
120
53
<100
210
<100
<20
<20
3, WO
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
<100
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<100
<100
1,060
460
<250
500
120
430
300
3^0
<500
<500
<500
400
<100
8,200
1,000
950
1,000
260
1,400
19,000
<500
Me reap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
0.020
2.55
0.260
0.420
0.430
0.012
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.022
0.079
0.018
0.133
0.078
0.027
0.020
<0.002
4.56
<0.002
0.008
1.24
0.037
Treated _V|aste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0,005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.002
<0,002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an NBS Library data-base of 42,000
compounds. The compound was not detected.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-7 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI 9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 11 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and PCB Constituents
METALS
154. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157. Beryllium
158. Cadmium
159. Chromium
160. Copper
161. Lead
162. Mercury
163. Nickel
165. Silver
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
PCBs
206. Aroclor 1260
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
<6.0
1.2
0.97
<0.1
0.63
4.0
2.1
3-4
<0.05
3.0
<0.9
<2.0
5.8
<0.5
<5.0
790
RCRA fllend»
mg/kg
(ppm)
24
94
1.3
<0.1
<0.3
40
165
27
<0.05
8.8
<0.9
2.2
4,170
0.9
31
830
PCB Blend*
rag/kg
(ppm)
<41
7.4
<19
NA
<33
23.7
107
<7.3
<5.5
6.2
<18
<2.6
6810
<0.5
15
16,000
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
rag/L
(ppm)
<0,060
<0.020
1.670
<0.001
<0.003
<0.009
0.027
0.0064
<0.001
0.037
0.018
<0.020
0.071
<0.010
0.950
17.0
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
NA
33,500
NA
0.41
0.046
0.48
<0.001
0.23
0.11
1.81
0.82
0.002
0.081
0.085
0.16
11.4
<0.01
20.0
NA
NA Not Analyzed.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-7 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #1 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS
Afterburner Temperature (°F)"t"
Residence Time (sec)
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)+
Excess Oxygen Concentration (%)+
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume)
DESIGN OPERATING VALUE++
* 2380
* 2
* PCB Blend Feed Rate: 36.1
Mercaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0.18
6.8
NR
NR Not Recorded.
+ Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
-(-+ See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for K019 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-24
-------
Table 4-8
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET K
Untreated Waste Concentration
tected BOAT List
panic Conabibuents
3LATILES
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
21, Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Diehloroethane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
42. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Triehloroethane
4?. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226, Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenaphthalene
52. Aeenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65, Benzo(k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis{2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
nig/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
3,800
<2,000
5,800
<2,000
<2,000
96,000
< 10 ,000
< 10, 000
6,700
<2,000
33,000
2,400
<2,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
280
<10
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
<20
<50
110
67
<20
40
PCB Blend*
rag /kg
(ppm)
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<10,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
4 1 , 000
<2,000
3,600
36,000
< 10, 000
16,000
< 10, 000
120
480
<250
400
<100
<100
<100
Me reap tan-
Con tarn ina ted
Waste*
mg/L
(ppml
17.0
1.90
<0.4
<0.4
<0,4
<0.4
<0.4
3.5
<2.0
<0,4
3.7
2.3
<0.4
4.4
<2,0
4.1
<2.0
<0.002
<0.002
1.22
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.079
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
(0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
0.0032
<0.002
(0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0,002
• Only one sample of this waste type Has taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-8 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #2 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
90, 2,4-Diehlorophenol
91. 2,6-Diehlorophenol
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109- Fluorene
110. Hexaehlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutad iene
113- Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122, 1,4-Naphthoquinone
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
152. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
K019
nig/ kg
(ppm)
SNA
<10
<10
74
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
16
60
<50
85
311
<10
<25
51
15
<10
<10
62
65
<50
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
28
<20
250
32
<50
<50
31
<20
120
53
<100
210
<100
<20
<20
3,100
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
<100
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppra)
<100
<100
1,060
460
<250
500
120
430
300
340
<500
<500
<500
400
<100
8,200
1,000
950
1,000
260
1,400
19,000
<500
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
0.020
2.55
0.260
0.420
0.430
0.012
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.022
0.079
0.018
0.133
0.078
0.027
0.020
<0.002
4.56
<0.002
0.008
1.24
0.037
Treated Haste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0,005
<0.005
0.0063
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an NBS Library data-base of 42,000
compounds. The compound was not detected.
Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-8 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #2 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and PCB Constituents
METftLS
154. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157. Beryllium
158. Cadmium
159- Chromium
160. Copper
161, Lead
162. Mercury
163. Nickel
165. Silver
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
PCBs
206. Aroclor 1260
KQ19
rag/ kg
(ppm)
<6.0
<0.2
<0.9
<0.1
0.46
3.4
1.7
2.3
<0.05
3-6
<0.9
<2.0
6.9
<0.5
<5.0
NA
RCRA Blend*
rag/kg
(ppm)
24
94
1.3
<0.1
<0.3
40
165
27
<0.05
8.8
<0.9
2.2
4,170
0.9
31
830
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<41
7-4
<19
NA
<33
23.7
107
<7.3
<5.5
6.2
<1B
<2.6
6810
<0.5
15
16,000
Mercaptan-
Con tarn ina ted
Waste*
mg/L
(PPm)
<0.060
<0.020
1.670
<0.001
<0.003
<0.009
0.027
0.0064
<0.001
0.037
0.018
<0.020
0.071
<0.010
0.950
17.0
NA
NA
NA Not Analyzed.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken.
33,500
NA
Treated Via ate
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
0.39
0.038
0.50
<0.001
0.19
0.14
1.38
0.78
0.0026
0.068
0.095
0.18
11.0
<0.01
15.0
NA
The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-8 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #2 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS DESIGN OPERATING VALUE**
Afterburner Temperature (OF) + * 2400
Residence Time (sec) * 2
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)+ * PCB Blend Feed Rate: 36.5
Mercaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0.18
Excess Oxygen Concentration (%)* 7.0
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume) NR
NR Not Recorded,
•*• Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
++ See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for KOI9 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information.
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-28
-------
Table 4-9
*-
vD
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI 9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #3
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILES
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9- Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
21. Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
42, Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
4?. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226. Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl Isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenaphthalene
52. Acenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65, Benzo(k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
rag/ kg
(ppm)
<2,OOG
3,500
<2,000
5.000
<2,000
<2,000
87,000
< 10 ,000
<10,000
6,000
<2,000
34,000
2,200
<2,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
290
<10
RCRA Blend*
rag/kg
(PPm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
<20
<50
110
67
<20
40
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(PPm)
<2,000
<2»000
<2P000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<10,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
41,000
<2,000
3,600
36,000
<10,000
16,000
<1 0,000
120
480
<250
400
<100
<100
<100
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
17.0
1.90
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
3.5
<2.0
<0.4
3.7
2.3
<0.4
4.4
<2.0
4.1
<2.0
<0.002
<0.002
1.22
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.079
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
<0,002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0,0043
<0.002
<0.002
<0,01
<0.01
<0.002
0.0026
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set,
-------
Table 4-9 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET *3 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituentg
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
90. 2,4-Diehlorophenol
T 91. 2,6-Dichlorophenol
o 98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109- Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutad iene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122. 1,4-Naphthoquinone
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
152. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
SNA
<10
<10
80
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
19
73
<50
95
350
<10
<25
59
11
<10
<10
67
70
<50
RCRA Blend*
rag/kg
(PP"»)
28
<20
250
32
<50
<50
31
<20
120
53
<100
210
<100
<20
<20
3,^00
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
<100
PCB Blend »
mg/kg
(ppm)
<100
<100
1,060
460
<250
500
120
430
300
340
<500
<500
<500
400
<100
8,200
1,000
950
1,000
260
1,400
19,000
<500
Mercaptan-
Con tarn ina ted
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
0.020
2.55
0.260
0.420
0.430
0.012
<0.002
<0 .002
<0.002
0.022
0.079
0.018
0.133
0.078
0.027
0.020
<0.002
4.56
<0.002
0.008
1.240
0.037
Trea ted Waste
Scrubber
Mater
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
0.0016
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0,01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an NBS Library data-base of 12,000
compounds. The compound was not detected.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 1-9 (Continued)
i
U)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET « (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and PCB Constituents
METALS
151. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157- Beryllium
158. Cadmium
159. Chromium
160. Copper
161. Lead
162. Mercury
163. Nickel
165, Silver
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
PCBs
206. Arochlor 1260
KOI 9
ing /kg
(ppm)
<6.0
<0,2
<0.9
<0.1
0.53
3.5
1.7
3.1
<0.05
2.3
<0.9
<2.0
1.1
<0.5
<5-0
NA
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
21
91
1,3
<0.1
<0.3
10
165
27
<0.05
8.8
<0.9
2.2
1,170
0.9
31
830
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<11
7.1
<19
NA
<33
23.7
107
<7-3
<5.5
6.2
<18
<2.6
6810
<0.5
15
16,000
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.060
<0.02
1.670
<0.001
<0.003
<0.009
0.027
0.0061
<0.001
0.037
0.018
<0.020
0.071
<0.010
0.950
17.0
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
NA
NA
33,500
NA
0.11
0.030
0.530
<0.001
0.150
0.13
1.18
0.61
0.0015
0.057
0.0092
0.150
9.50
<0.01
11.0
NA
NA Not Analyzed.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-9 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 13 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS
Afterburner Temperature (%)*
Residence Time (sec)
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)*
DESIGN
*
*
*
Excess Oxygen Concentration (II)"1"
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume)"1"
OPERATING VALUE++
2400
2
PCS Blend Feed Rate: 36.5
Mercaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0.18
7.2
0
+ Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
++ See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for K019 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-32
-------
Table 4-10
I
L.J
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET *4
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILES
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
1li. Chloroform
21, Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Diehloroethane
23, 1,2-D ichloroe thane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
42. Tetrachloroethene
13. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Triehloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226. Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenaphthalene
52. Acenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65. Benzo(k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl}ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
rag/kg
(PP"i)
<2,000
3,900
<2,000
5,300
<2,000
<2,000
122,000
< 10, 000
< 10, 000
7,200
<2,000
44,000
2,300
<2,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
310
<10
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
<20
<50
110
67
<20
40
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10,000
<2,000
41,000
<2,000
3,600
36,000
<10,000
16,000
<10,000
120
480
<250
400
<100
<100
<100
Mercaptan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
17.0
1.90
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
3.5
<2.0
<0.4
3.7
2.3
<0.4
4.4
<2.0
4.1
<2.0
<0.002
<0.002
1.22
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.079
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.014
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
0.0046
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
C0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set,
-------
*-
p*
Table 4-10 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KG19
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 14 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Diehlorobenzene
88. p-Diehlorobenzene
90. 2,4-Dichlorophenol
91. 2,6-Dichlorophenol
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexaehlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122. 1,4-Naphthoquinone
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
14 1. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
152. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
K019
rag/ kg
(ppm)
SNA
<10
<10
84
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
21
61
<50
94
360
<10
<25
64
19
<10
<10
82
74
<50
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
28
<20
250
32
<50
<50
31
<20
120
53
<100
210
<100
<20
<20
3,400
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
<100
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<100
<100
1,060
460
<250
500
120
430
300
340
<500
<500
<500
400
<100
8,200
1,000
950
1,000
260
1,400
19,000
<500
Me reap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.002
0.020
2.55
0.260
0.420
0.430
0.012
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.022
0.079
0.018
0.133
0.078
0.027
0.020
<0.002
4.56
<0.002
0.008
1.240
0.037
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
rag/L
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
0.0042
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.010
CO.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an NBS Library data-base of 42,000
compounds. The compound was not detected.
Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-10 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET II (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Mercaptan-
Contaminated
Waste*
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and PCB Constituents
K019
mg/kg
-------
Table 4-10 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET W (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS DESIGN OPERATING VftLUE++
Afterburner Temperature (°F5"t" * 2400
Residence Time (sec) * 2
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)* * PCS Blend Feed Rate: 36.5
Mercaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0,18
Excess Oxygen Concentration (%)* 6.4
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume)4" 0
+ Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
++ See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for K019 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
4-36
-------
Table 4-11
1
-J
^
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 15
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILES
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetraehloride
9. Chlorobenzene
1*1. Chloroform
21. DichlorodIfluoromethane
22. 1,1-Diehloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
142. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226. Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl Isobutyl ketone
SEHIVOLftTILES
§1. Acenaphthalene
52. Acenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65. Benzo(k)fluoranthene
68. Bls(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
mg/kg
(Ppm)
<2,000
4,000
<2,000
6,000
<2,000
<2,OOQ
130,000
< 10, 000
< 10 ,000
7,800
<2,000
45,000
2,500
<2,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
340
<10
RCRA Blend»
mg/kg
(ppm)
2,000
-------
I
u>
oo
Table 4-11 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #5 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
90. 2,4-Diehlorophenol
91. 2,6-Dichlorophenol
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutad iene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122. 1,4-Naphthoquinone
126, Nitrobenzene
136. Pentaehlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichloroben2ene
152. 2,4,6-Tricnlorophenol
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
SNA
<10
<10
90
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
19
87
<50
113
371
<10
<25
63
19
<10
<10
73
72
<50
HCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppn)
28
<20
250
32
<50
<50
31
<20
120
53
<100
210
<100
<20
<20
3,100
<100
240
78
200
<50
<50
<100
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(Ppm)
<100
<100
1,060
160
<250
500
120
430
300
3^0
<500
<500
<500
400
<100
8,200
1,000
950
1,000
260
1,400
19,000
<500
Me reap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(PPm)
<0.002
0.020
2.55
0.260
0.420
0.430
0.012
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.022
0.079
0.018
0.133
0.078
0.027
0.020
<0.002
4.56
<0.002
0.008
1.240
0.037
TreatedWaste
Scrubber
Mater
mg/L
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
•C0.005
<0.005
0.0027
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
SNA A standard is not available; the compound was searched using an NBS Library data-base of 42,000
compounds. The compound was not detected.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-11 (Continued)
i
u>
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #5 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and PCB Constituents
METALS
. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157. Beryllium
158. Cadmium
159- Chromium
160. Copper
161. Lead
162. Mercury
163- Nickel
165. Silver
167. Vanadium
168. 2inc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
PCBs
206. Aroclor 1260
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
<6.0
<0.2
<0.9
<0.1
0.36
3.2
2.1
2.5
<0.05
H.8
<0.9
<2.0
4.7
<0.5
<5.0
NA
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(PPm)
24
9H
1.3
<0.1
<0.3
40
165
27
<0.05
8.8
<0.9
2.2
4,170
0.9
31
830
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<41
7.4
<19
NA
<33
23.7
107
<7.3
<5.5
6.2
<18
<2.6
6810
<0.5
15
16,000
Me reap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0,060
<0.020
1.670
<0.001
<0.003
<0.009
0.027
0.0064
<0.001
0.037
0.018
<0.020
0.071
<0.010
0.950
17.0
NA
NA Not Analyzed.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken.
NA
33,500
NA
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
(ppm)
0.35
0.027
0.600
0.002
0.12
0.14
1.03
0.48
0.001
0.067
0.090
0.160
11.1
<0.01
12.0
The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-11 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KG 19
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #5 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS
Afterburner Temperature (OF)*
Residence Time (sec)
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)*
Excess Oxygen Concentration
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume)
DESIGN OPERATING VALUE-*-*
* 2400
* 2
* PCS Blend Feed Rate: 37.5
Mercaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0.18
6.8
NR
MR Not Recorded.
+ Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
++ See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for K019 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
H-4G
-------
Table 4-12
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR K019
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET 16
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BDAT List
Organic Constituents
VOLATILES
4. Benzene
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
21. Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Diehloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
34. Methyl ethyl ketone
38. Methylene chloride
12. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
215-217. Xylene (total)
222. Acetone
226. Ethyl benzene
229. Methyl isobutyl ketone
SEMIVOLATILES
51. Acenaphthalene
52. Acenaphthene
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
65. Benzo{k)fluoranthene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
1,100
<2,000
5,600
<2,000
<2,000
98,000
< 10, 000
< 10, 000
6,900
<2,000
44,000
2,500
<2,000
< 10, 000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10
<10
<25
<10
<10
330
<10
RCRA Blend"
mg/kg
(ppm)
2,000
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
<8
940
910
490
2,300
130
360
3,400
1,200
2,200
1,100
150
<20
<50
110
67
<20
40
PCB Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
< 10, 000
<10,000
<2,000
41,000
<2,000
3,600
36,000
<10,000
16,000
<10,000
120
480
<250
400
<100
<100
<100
Mercap tan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
17.0
1.90
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
3.5
<2.0
<0.4
3.7
2.3
<0.4
4.4
<2.0
4.1
<2.0
<0.002
<0.002
1.22
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.079
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Water
mg/L
<0,002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.01
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
Only one sample of this waste type was taken. The results are repeated in each sample set,
-------
Table 1-12 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET *6 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List
Organic Constituents
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
80. Chrysene
81. ortho-Cresol
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Diehlorobenzene
90. 2,4-Dichlorophenol
91. 2,6-D i chloropheno1
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
104. Di-n-octyl phthalate
108. Fluoranthene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexaehlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113- Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
122. 1,4-Naphthoquinone
126. Nitrobenzene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
142. Phenol
145. Pyrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
152. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
K019
rag/ kg
(PPtn)
SNA
-------
Table 4-12 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED B¥ EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET *6 (Continued)
Untreated Waste Concentration
Detected BOAT List Metal,
Inorganic and _PCB Conatituents
METALS
154. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157. Beryllium
158. Cadmium
159. Chromium
160. Copper
161. Lead
162. Mercury
163. Nickel
165. Silver
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
INORGANICS
169. Total Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. Sulfide
PCBs
K019
mg/kg
(ppm)
<6.0
<0.2
<0.9
<0.1
0.62
5.3
3.6
3.5
<0.05
6.0
<0.9
<2.0
8.1|
<0.5
<5.0
NA
RCRA Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
24
94
1-3
<0.1
<0.3
HO
165
27
<0.05
8.8
<0.9
2.2
4,170
0.9
31
830
PCS Blend*
mg/kg
(ppm)
<41
7.1
<19
NA
<33
23.7
107
<7.3
<5.5
6.2
<18
<2.6
6810
<0.5
15
16,000
Mereaptan-
Contaminated
Waste*
mg/L
(ppm)
<0.060
<0.020
1.670
<0.001
<0.003
<0.009
0.027
0.0064
<0.001
0.037
0.018
<0.020
0.071
<0.010
0.950
17.0
NA
206. Aroclor 1260
NA Mot Analyzed.
* Only one sample of this waste type was taken.
NA
33,500
NA
Treated Waste
Scrubber
Hater
mg/L
0.32
0.033
0.57
<0.001
0.11
OJ3
0.87
0.4
0.001
0.061
0.092
0.16
10.4
<0.01
12.0
The results are repeated in each sample set.
-------
Table 4-12 (Continued)
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTED BY EPA FOR KOI9
PLANT A - COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SAMPLE SET #6 (Continued)
DESIGN AND OPERATING PARAMETERS DESIGN OPERATING VALUE-M-
Afterburner Temperature (°F}4" * 2350
Residence Time (sec) * 2
Waste Feed Rate (MMBTU/hr)* * PCB Blend Feed Rate: 37.5
Mereaptan-Contaminated Waste
Feed Rate: 0,18
Excess Oxygen Concentration (%)* 7,0
Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppm volume) NR
NR Not Recorded.
+ Strip charts for this parameter are included in Appendix C.
-t-t- See Tables 3-1 through 3-6 for K019 and RCRA Blend feed rates.
*This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information.
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
-------
I
£>
Ul
Table 4-13
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUBMITTED BY INDUSTRY FOR CHLORINATED WASTES*
PLANT B - FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR
TEST RUN 1
Const 1tuent
Condition !»•
7. Carbon tetrachlortae
42. TetrachIoroethene
8S. p-Dlchlorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence tlma In SRC (Sec)
ConditIon
7. Carbon tetrachlorlde
42. Tetrach1orouthene
88, p-Olchlorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence ttnt« In SRC (Sec)
Condition
I >*
7. Carbon tet rach I or 1de
42. Tet rach 1 oroethene
88. p-D1ch 1 orobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time In SRC (Sec)
ConditIon
IV**
tetrachlorlde
Untreated Waste*
Sludge Waste
Feed
Concent rat 1 on
mg/kg
(ppm)
12,000
95 , 000
4,900
2,441
3.2
2.000
60 , 000
1.000
1 ,564
4.8
12,000
86,000
6,200
1,883
3.2
9,000
70,000
4, 100
1 .371
4.8
Liquid Waste
Feed
Concent rat Ion
my/Kg
(ppm)
256,000
444,000
296,000
102
262,000
440.000
294.000
121.5
249,000
441 ,000
289,000
1 17.2
252.000
444.000
297.000
68.5
Sol 1d Waste
Feed
Concent rat < on
nig/ kg
(ppm)
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.5
<0.5
<1 .5
1 ,638
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.5
<0.5
-------
Table 4-14
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUBMITTED BY INDUSTRY FOR CHLORINATED WASTES*
PLANT B - FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR
TEST RUN 2
Const 1tuent
CondltIon |*«
7. Carbon tatrachlorlde
42. Tetrachloroethena
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time In SRC (Sac)
CondltIon
11**
tatrachlorlde
7. Carbon
42, Tatrachloroethene
88. p-D1chlorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time in SRC (Sec)
Condition III**
7. Carbon tatrachlorlde
42. TetrachIoroethune
B8. p-Olchlorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time in SRC (Sec)
ConditIon
JV*»
tatrachlorlde
Untreated Waste*
Sludge Waste
Feed
Concent rat ton
me /kg
(ppm)
12,000
94,000
5,600
2,448
3.2
2,000
60,000
1 ,000
1.352
4.8
12,000
93,000
7, 100
1 ,882
3.2
1 I ,000
83.000
5.300
1.383
4.8
Liquid Waste
Feed
Concent rat -Ion
mg/kg
(ppm)
260,000
444,000
303,000
53.9
261 .000
440,000
300,000
133.9
251 .000
442.000
295,000
142
252.000
444.000
295,000
76.8
Sol id Waste
Feed
Concentration
mg/kg
(ppm)
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.5
<0.5
-------
Table 1-15
TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUBMITTED BY INDUSTRY FOR CHLORINATED WASTES*
PLANT B - FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR
TEST RUN 3
Const 1tuent
Condit Ion
1**
tetrachIorlde
7. Carbon
42. Tatrach)oroethene
88. p-D1ch1orobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time 1n SRC (Sec)
Cond 111 on 11 * *
7. Carbon tetrachJorIde
42. TetrachloroBthane
88. p-D1ch1urobanrene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time 1n SRC (Sec)
Condition 111**
7. Carbon tatrachI or Ida
42. Tetrach]oroethene
88. p-D1chIorobenzene
Inlet Feed Rate (Ibs/hr)
Residence time 1n SRC (Sec)
ConditIon
Untreated Waste*
Sludge Waste
Feed
Concent rat 1on
mg/kg
(ppm)
10,000
81 ,000
4.900
2,565
3.2
13,000
85.000
6,500
1 ,742
4.B
15.000
94.000
7,500
2,083
3.2
10,000
77.000
4.600
1 ,294
4.B
Liquid Waste
Feed
Concentration
mg/kg
(ppm)
260,000
445.000
298,000
67.8
259,000
447,000
304,000
96.8
254,000
441 ,000
294,000
95, 1
252.000
444 , 000
294,000
68.5
Sol td Waste
Feed
Concent rat Ion
mg/kg
(ppm)
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.5
<0.5
<^ .5
t .638
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.5
<0.5
<1 .5
980
Treated Waste
Incinerator
Ash
Concent rat 1 on
mg/kg
(ppm)
-------
-------
5.0 IDENTIFICATION OF BEST DEMONSTRATED AND AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY
This section presents the rationale behind the determination of
rotary kiln incineration as the best demonstrated and available technology
(BDAT) for the chlorinated waste group (K016, K018, KQ19, K020, and K030).
In Section 3.0 of thia document, the Agency identified three types
of incineration as demonstrated and available technology to be considered for
BDAT for the chlorinated waste group (K016, K018, K019, K020, and KQ30). The
three types of incineration are: rotary kiln incineration, fluidized bed
incineration, and liquid injection incineration.
As described in Section 1.0, BDAT for treatment of these wastes is
identified based on treatment performance data available to the Agency, (All
performance data available to the Agency are discussed in Section 4.0.) Prior
to being used to establish treatment standards, performance data are screened
to determine whether they represent operation of a well-designed and operated
system, whether sufficient analytical quality assurance/quality control
measures were employed to ensure the accuracy of the data, and whether the
appropriate measure of performance was used to assess the performance of the
particular treatment technology, i.e., total constituent concentration in the
case of incineration. All remaining data are then adjusted based on recovery
data in order to take into account analytical interferences associated with
the chemical make-up of the samples. Finally, treatment performance data from
each technology are compared (technology to technology), to determine whether
any technology performs better than the others.
5-1
-------
5-1 Review of Performance Data
The available treatment performance data presented in Section 4.0
were reviewed and assessed to determine whether they represent operation of a
well-designed and operated system, whether sufficient quality assurance/qual-
ity control measures were employed to ensure the accuracy of the data, and
whether the appropriate measure of performance was used to assess the perfor-
mance of the treatment technology.
The treatment performance data and the design and operating data
collected during the teat on the rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant A
were reviewed. The appropriate measure of performance (total constituent
concentration) was used to assess the rotary kiln incineration system,
Additionally, the Agency had no reason to believe that the treatment system at
plant A was not well-designed and well-operated or that insufficient analyti-
cal quality assurance/quality control measures were employed. Therefore,
these data were considered in the determination of BOAT.
The treatment performance data and the operating data for fluidized
bed incineration of chlorinated wastes (submitted by plant B) were reviewed,
The appropriate measure of performance (total constituent concentration) was
used to assess the fluidized bed incineration system. Additionally, the
Agency had no reason to believe that the treatment system at plant B was not
well-designed and well-operated or that insufficient analytical quality
assurance/quality control measures were employed. However, the Agency has no
5-2
-------
information specific to the sources and thus, the identity of the untreated
wastes fed to the fluidized bed incinerator. Furthermore, the Agency does not
have sufficient raw waste characterization data to determine that these
untreated wastes are similar to K016, KQ18-KQ20, K030. In addition, the
Agency has no reason to expect that fluidized bed incineration will provide
better treatment than rotary kiln incineration for KQ16, K018, K019, K020, and
K030 waste. However, the Agency believes that K016, K018, KQ19, K020, or K030
wastes treated in a well-designed and operated fluidized bed incineration
system will meet the BOAT treatment standards established for these wastes,
Therefore, these data were not considered in the determination of BDAT.
As discussed in Section 3.0, treatment performance data are not
available for liquid injection incineration for the chlorinated waste group
(K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030). Therefore, in the absence of treatment
performance data for these wastes or wastes Judged to be similar, liquid
injection incineration was considered and ultimately rejected as BDAT for the
chlorinated waste group (K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030). However, the
Agency believes that a well designed and operated liquid injection incinera-
tion system will meet the BDAT treatment standards established for this waste
group,
5.2 Accuracy Correction^ of Performance Data
Following the review of all available treatment performance data,
the remaining treatment performance data for the demonstrated and available
technology (rotary kiln incineration) were adjusted in order to take into
5-3
-------
account analytical interferences associated with the chemical make-up of the
samples. Generally, performance data were corrected for accuracy as follows:
(1) a matrix spike recovery was determined, as explained below, for each BDAT
List constituent detected in the untreated or treated waste; (2) an accuracy
correction factor was determined for each of the above constituents by divid-
ing 100 by the matrix spike recovery (in percent) for that constituent; and
(3) treatment performance data for each BDAT List constituent detected in the
untreated or treated waste were corrected by multiplying the reported concen-
tration of the constituent by the corresponding accuracy correction factor.
Matrix spike recoveries are developed by analyzing a sample of a
treated waste for a constituent and then re-analyzing the sample after the
addition of a known amount of the same constituent (i.e., spike) to the
sample. The matrix spike recovery represents the total amount of constituent
recovered after spiking minus the initial concentration of the constituent in
the sample, and the result divided by the known amount of constituent added.
5.2.1 Nonwastewater
Matrix spike recoveries used in adjustment of the treatment perfor-
mance data for the kiln ash residue are presented in Table D-4 of Appendix D
of this background document. Duplicate matrix spikes were performed for some
BDAT List volatile and semivolatile constituents in kiln ash. If duplicate
matrix spikes were performed for an organic constituent, the matrix spike
recovery used for that constituent was the lower of the two values from the
first matrix spike and the duplicate spike.
-------
Where a matrix spike was not performed for an organic constituent,
the matrix spike recovery for that constituent was derived from the average
matrix spike recoveries of the appropriate group of constituents (volatile or
semivolatile constituents) for which recovery data were available. In these
cases, the matrix spike recoveries for all volatiles or semivolatiles from the
first matrix spike were averaged. Similarly, an average matrix spike recovery
was calculated for the duplicate matrix spike recoveries. The lower of the
two average matrix spike recoveries of the volatile or semivolatile group was
used for any vblatile or semivolatile constituent for which no matrix spike
was performed. For example, no matrix spike was performed for di-n-butyl
phthalate, a base/neutral fraction semivolatile, in rotary kiln incinerator
ash; however, the treatment performance data for this constituent were
adjusted for accuracy using a matrix spike recovery of 103 percent. This
recovery was developed by averaging the matrix spike recoveries calculated for
all base/neutral fraction senivolatiles in the first matrix spike (104$) and
the duplicate spike (103$). The lower average matrix spike recovery of 103$
was selected to subsequently calculate the accuracy correction factor and the
corrected treatment concentration for di-n-butyl phthalate.
The accuracy correction factors for rotary kiln ash data are pre-
sented in fable D-6 of Appendix D of this document. The corrected treatment
concentrations for the BOAT List organic constituents detected in either the
untreated K019 or rotary kiln ash are presented in Table 5-1 for kiln ash
residue. Note that constituent concentrations were not adjusted to values
below the detection limit for each constituent. If accuracy correction
5-5
-------
resulted in a value less than the detection limit, the accuracy-corrected
concentration was set equal to the detection limit.
5.2.2 Wastewater
Matrix spike recoveries used to calculate accuracy correction
factors for adjustment of the treatment performance data are presented in
Table D-5 of Appendix D. As shown in Table D-5, if duplicate matrix spikes
were performed for an organic constituent, the matrix spike recovery used for
that constituent was the lower of the two values from the first matrix spike
and the duplicate spike.
Where a matrix spike was not performed for an organic constituent,
the matrix spike recovery for that constituent was derived from the average
matrix spike recoveries of the appropriate group of constituents (volatile or
semivolatile constituents) for which recovery data were available. In these
cases, the matrix spike recoveries for all volatiles or semivolatiles from the
first matrix spike were averaged. Similarly, an average matrix spike recovery
was calculated for the duplicate matrix spike recoveries. The lower of the
two average matrix spike recoveries of the volatile or semivolatile group was
used for any volatile or semivolatile constituent for which no matrix spike
was performed. For example, no matrix spike was performed for 1,1,2-tri-
chloroethane, a volatile, in scrubber water; however, the treatment per-
formance data for this constituent were adjusted for accuracy using a matrix
spike recovery of 78 percent. This recovery was determined by averaging the
matrix spike recoveries calculated for all volatiles in the first matrix spike
5-6
-------
and the duplicate spike (78?). The lower average matrix spike recovery
of 78$ was selected to subsequently calculate the accuracy correction factor
and the corrected treatment concentration for 1,1,2-trichloroethane.
The accuracy correction factors for wastewater (scrubber water) data
calculated using this method are presented in Table D-6 of Appendix D of this
document. The corrected treatment concentrations for each BDAT List organic
constituent detected in either the untreated K019 or scrubber water are
presented in Table 5-2. Scrubber water concentrations were not adjusted to
values below the detection limit for each constituent. If accuracy correction
resulted in a value less than the detection limit, the accuracy-corrected
value was set equal to the detection limit.
5.3 Statistical Comparison of Performance Data
In cases where the Agency has treatment data from more than one
technology, EPA uses the statistical method known as the analysis of variance,
ANOVA (discussed in Section 1.0), to determine if one technology performs
significantly better than the rest. In this case the Agency has treatment
data only for rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant A; therefore, an ANOVA
comparison is not applicable and rotary kiln incineration is determined to be
BOAT for the nonwastewater forms of K019.
5-7
-------
5.1 BOAT for K016. K018. KOI9. K020 and K030
The best demonstrated and available technology for KOI9 has been
determined to be rotary kiln incineration. As discussed in Section 2.0, EPA
has determined that the chlorinated organics waste group, K016, K018, K019,
K02Q and K030, represents a single waste treatability group. Therefore, since
rotary kiln incineration has been determined to be BOAT for K019, this
technology is also BDAT for KOI6, K018, K020 and K030.
5-8
-------
Table 5-1
TREATMENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR K019 KILN ASH RESIDUE CORRECTED FOR ACCURACY*
Sample Set
Constituent
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1,1,1-TrIchloroethane
47. Triehloroethene
68. Bi3(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bi3(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
136. Pentaehlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
(ppp)
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
2
iPJli
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
3
(ppn)
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
4
(ppin)
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
11.7
223
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
5
(ppm)
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
6
(ppm)
2.13
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
•This table presents corrected treatment concentrations for the BDAT List
organic constituents detected in either the untreated K019 or rotary kiln ash
from plant A. Calculations are shown in Appendix D.
5-9
-------
Table 5-2
TREATMENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR SCRUBBER WATER CORRECTED FOR ACCURACY*
Sample Set
Constituent
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
21, Dichlorodifluoromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
43. Toluene
45. 1,1,1-Triehloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
68. Bts(2-ehloroethyl)ether
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
98. Dl-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
141. Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.006
150. 1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
3
(ppm)
4
(ppm)
5
(ppm)
6
(ppm)
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.008
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.003
0,003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.018
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0,003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.006
0,008
"This table presents corrected treatment concentrations for the BDAT List
organic constituents detected in either the untreated K019 or scrubber water
from plant A. Calculations are shown in Appendix D.
5-10
-------
6,0 SELECTION OF REGULATED CONSTITUENTS
This section presents the methodology and rationale for selection of
the regulated constituents in wastewater and nonwastewater forms of K016,
KQ18, KQ19, K020, and K030.
The Agency initially considered for regulation all constituents on
the BOAT List (see Table 1-1, Section 1.0). Summarized in Table 6-1 for each
wastecode are available waste characterization data for the BOAT List
constituents. For constituents known to be present in the wastes, the range
of detected concentration is shown in the table. Those constituents that were
analyzed but were not detected in the wastes are identified by "NO",
Constituents for which the Agency does not have analytical characterization
data are identified by "NA" (not analyzed). As explained in Section 1.0, the
Agency is not regulating all of the constituents considered for regulation in
order to reduce the analytical cost burdens on the treater, and to facilitate
implementation of the compliance and enforcement program. As discussed
further below, a BOAT List constituent was not considered for regulation if:
(1) the constituent was not detected in the untreated waste; (2) the constitu-
ent was not analyzed in the untreated waste; or (3) detection limits or
analytical results were not obtained for the constituent due to analytical or
accuracy problems. Some additional constituents were deleted froo consider-
ation for regulation, as discussed in Section 6,1.
6-1
-------
BOAT List Constituents That Were Not Detected in the Untreated
Waste, In general, constituents that were not detected in the untreated waste
(labelled ND in Table 6-1) were not considered for regulation. One exception
is for constituents that were detected in the treated waste (labelled ND* in
Table 6-1). These constituents may have been present but were not detected in
the untreated wastes due to analytical masking problems or that they may not
have been present in the untreated waste, but were formed during the
incineration process. The constituents are: bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and
di-n-butyl phthalate which were not detected in untreated K019 but were
detected in kiln ash residue from rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant A
(sampled by EPA); toluene and di-n-butyl phthalate which were also not
detected in untreated K019 but were detected in the scrubber water residual
from rotary kiln incineration of K019.
Dichlorodifluoromethane was not detected in the untreated K019 but
was detected in the scrubber water residual at plant A. This constituent is
believed to be present in the waste due to the contamination from a process
coolant system at plant A. The detection limits determined in the character-
ization of K019 are presented in Appendix F.
BDflT List Constituents That Were Not Analyzed. Some constituents on
the BOAT List were not considered for regulation because they were not ana-
lyzed in the untreated wastes (labelled NA, in Table 6-1). Some constituents
were not analyzed in the untreated wastes based on the Judgment that it is
extremely unlikely that the constituent would be present in the wastes. Other
6-2
-------
constituents were not analyzed in the untreated waste because they were not on
the BOAT List of constituents at the time of analysis. In cases where data
were submitted to the Agency by outside sources, it may not be known if and/or
why constituents were not analyzed.
Constituents For Which Analytical Results j/ere Mot Obtained Due to
Analytical or Accuracy Problems. Some constituents on the BOAT List were not
considered for regulation because detection limits or analytical results were
not obtained due to analytical or accuracy problems (labelled A in Table 6-1),
The analytical and accuracy problems include: (1) laboratory QA/QC analyses
indicated inadequate recoveries and, therefore, the accuracy of the analysis
for the constituent could not be ensured; (2) a standard was not available for
the constituent and, therefore, system calibration could not be performed for
the constituent; and (3) colorimetrie interferences occurred during analysis
for the constituent and, therefore, accurate analyses could not be performed.
6.1 BDftT List Constituents Detected in Untreated Waste But Not Con-
sidered for Regulation
Some BOAT List constituents that were detected in the untreated
K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030 wastes were not considered for regulation if
{1) available treatment performance data for the constituent did not show
effective treatment by BOAT; (2) treatment performance data were not available
for the constituent; or (3) the constituent was not present at treatable
concentrations in the waste; or (4) other reasons as described below. BOAT
6-3
-------
List constituents that were further considered for regulation following the
deletions described in this section are listed in Table 6-2.
BOAT List metal constituents were not considered for regulation in
K016, K018, K019, K020t and K030 because these constituents were not detected
at treatable concentrations in either the untreated K019 waste or the K019
treatment residuals (incinerator ash and scrubber water). Data were not
available for metals analyses in K016, K018, K020, and K030, However, due to
the similarity between these wastes and K019, metals would also not be
expected to be present at treatable concentrations in K016, K018, KQ2Q, and
K030. Furthermore, incineration, the technology for which treatment per-
formance data were collected for K019 waste, does not provide substantial
treatment for metals.
Sulfide was not considered for regulation for K019 nonwastewater
because the technology determined to be BOAT for K019 (rotary kiln inciner-
ation) does not provide effective treatment for this constituent. Moreover,
the Agency is unaware of any demonstrated technology for treatment of sulfide
in K019.
6.2 Constituents Selected for Regulation
BOAT List constituents selected for regulation in KQ16, K018, K019,
K020, and K030 are presented in Table 6-3. The selection of regulated
-------
constituents in nonwastewaters is discussed in Section 6.2.1 and for waste-
waters in Section 6.2.2.
6.2.1 Selection of RegulatedConstituents in Nonwaatewater
Regulated organic and inorganic constituents in nonwaatewater were
selected from those BDAT List organic and inorganic constituents detected in
the untreated wastes that were effectively treated by rotary kiln incineration
and from those constituents that were detected in the treated wastes.
As explained in Section 1.0, the Agency is not regulating all of the
constituents considered for regulation (Table 6-2) to reduce the analytical
cost burdens on the treater and to facilitate implementation of the compliance
and enforcement program. Included in Table 6-3 are constituents selected for
regulation after consideration of: (1) constituent concentration levels in
the untreated waste; (2} whether the constituents are adequately controlled by
the regulation of another constituent; (3) the relative difficulty associated
with achieving effective treatment of the constituent by BDAT.
Determination of adequate control for organic constituents was based
on an evaluation of the characteristics of the constituents that would affect
performance of rotary kiln incineration relative to the kiln ash residual,
specifically, the boiling point of the constituents. In general, a constitu-
ent is believed to be controlled by regulation of another constituent that has
6-5
-------
a higher boiling point. Boiling points for all BDAT List constituents con-
sidered for regulation are tabulated in Appendix E,
The constituents selected for regulation and the constituents
controlled by regulating other constituents are discussed below for each waste
code.
K016
All constituents considered for regulation in K016 nonwastewater
were selected for regulation. The constituents selected for regulation are
tetrachloroethene, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachloroeyclo-
pentadiene, and hexachloroethane.
K018
Chloroethane, 1,1-diehloroethanef 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1,1-trichlo-
roethane, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachloroethane, and
pentachloroethane were selected for regulation in K018 nonwastewater. Chlo-
romethane and 1,1,2-trichloroethane were detected in untreated K018 and were
considered for regulation, but were not selected because they were found at
lower concentrations in the untreated waste and they are believed to be
adequately controlled by incineration of other constituents that have been
selected for regulation. This decision was based on a comparison of boiling
6-6
-------
points of those constituents considered for regulation. EPA believes that
chloromethane (bp -24°C) will be adequately controlled by regulation of
chloroethane {bp 12°C}, 1,1-diehloroethane (bp 57°C), and other regulated
constituents with boiling points higher than -24°C. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (bp
113°C) will be adequately controlled by regulation of pentachloroethane (bp
161°C), hexachloroethane (bp 187°C), and other regulated constituents with
boiling points higher than 113°C.
KQ19
Chlorobenzene, chloroform, 1,2-dlehloroethane, tetrachloroethene,
1,1,1-trichloroethane, bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, hexachloroethane, naphthalene,
phenanthrene, and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene were selected for regulation in K019
nonwastewater. Carbon tetrachloride, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetra-
chloroethane, fcrtchloroethene, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, p-dichlorobenzene,
fluorene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachlorobenzene, pentachlorobenzene, and
1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene were detected in untreated K019 and were considered
for regulation, but were not selected because these constituents were found at
lower concentrations in the untreated waste and they are believed to be
adequately controlled by incineration of other constituents which have been
selected for regulation. This decision was based on a comparison of the
boiling points of those constituents considered for regulation. EPA believes
that carbon tetrachloride (bp 77°C) will be adequately controlled by regu-
lation of chlorobenzene (bp 131°C), 1,2-dichloroethane (bp 83°C), and other
6-7
-------
regulated constituents with boiling points higher than ?7°C. 1,1-Dichloro-
ethane (bp 57°C) will be adequately controlled by regulation of chlorobenzene
-------
K020
1,2-Dichloroethane, 1f1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, and tetrachloro-
ethene, were selected for regulation in K020 nonwastewater. 1,1,2-Trtchloro-
ethane was considered for regulation, but was not selected because it was
found at a lower concentration in the untreated waste, and it is believed to
be adequately controlled by incineration of other constituents which have been
selected for regulation. This decision was based on a comparison of the
boiling points of those constituents considered for regulation, EPA believes
that 1,1»2-trichloroethane (bp 113°C) will be adequately controlled by regu-
lation of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane {bp W°C) and tetrachloroethene (bp
K030
Tetrachloroethene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachloroethane, hexa-
ohloropropene, pentaehlorobenzene, pentachloroethane, 1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-
benzene, and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene were selected for regulation in K030
nonwaatewater. o-Diehlorobenzene, p-dichlorobenzene, and hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene were detected in untreated KQ30 and were considered for regulation
but were not selected because these constituents were found at lower concen-
trations in the untreated waste and they are believed to be adequately con-
trolled by incineration of other constituents which have been selected for
regulation. This decision was based on a comparison of the boiling points of
those constituents considered for regulation. EPA believes that o-dichloro-
6-9
-------
benzene (bp 181°) and p-dichlorobenzene (bp 174°C) will be adequately con-
trolled fay regulation of hexachlorobutadiene (fap 215°C), hexachloroethane (bp
187°C), and other regulated constituents with boiling points higher than
181°C. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (bp 23^°C) will be adequately controlled by
regulation of pentachlorobenzene (bp 276°C) and 1,2,U,5-tetrachloroben2ene (bp
216°C).
6.3.2 Selection of Regulated Constituents in Wastewaters
Regulated constituents for wastewater forms of K016, K018, K019,
K020, and K030 were selected based on the method used for nonwastewaters; that
is, regulated organic and inorganic constituents in wastewater were selected
from the BDAT List organic constituents detected in the untreated wastes that
showed effective treatment using rotary kiln incineration and from those
constituents that were detected in the treated wastes.
As explained in Section 1.0, not all of the constituents considered
for regulation (Table 6-2) will be regulated by the Agency to reduce the
analytical cost burdens on the treater and to facilitate implementation of the
compliance and enforcement program. Table 6-3 presents the constituents
selected for regulation after consideration of: (1) constituent concentration
in the untreated waste; (2) whether the constituents are adequately controlled
by the regulation of another constituent; (3) the relative difficulty associ-
ated with achieving effective treatment of the constituent by BDAT.
6-10
-------
The Agency's determination of adequate control for organic constitu-
ents is based on an evaluation of the characteristics of the constituents that
would affect performance of incineration relative to the scrubber water
residual, specifically, the estimated bond dissociation energies for the
constituents. In general, a constituent is believed to be controlled by
regulation of another constituent that has a higher bond dissociation energy.
Estimated bond dissociation energies for all BDAT list constituents considered
for regulation are tabulated in Appendix E.
The constituents selected for regulation and the constituents con-
trolled by regulating other constituents are discussed below by waste code.
K016
All constituents considered for regulation in K016 wastewater were
selected for regulation. The constituents selected for regulation are tetra-
chloroethene, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachloroeyclopenta-
diene, and hexachloroethane.
K018
Chloroethane, ehloromethane, 1,1-diehloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane,
1,1,1-trichloroethane, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, and penta-
chloroethane were selected for regulation in K018 Hastewater. Hexachloro-
ethane and 1,1,2-trichloroethane were considered for regulation but were not
selected because these constituents were found in lower concentrations in the
6-11
-------
untreated waste, and they are believed to be adequately controlled by incin-
eration of other constituents which have been selected for regulation. This
decision was based on a comparison of bond dissociation energies (BDE) of
those constituents considered for regulation. EPft believes that hexaehloro-
ethane (BDE 655 kcal/raole) will be adequately controlled by regulation of
pentachloroethane (BDE 660 kcal/raole), 1,1,1-triehloroethane (BDE 670
kcal/mole), and other regulated constituents with bond dissociation energies
greater than 655 kcal/mole. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (BDE 670 kcal/raole), will
be adequately controlled by regulation of 1,1-dlchloroethane (BDE 675
kcal/mole), 1,2-dichloroethane (BDE 675 keal/oole), and other regulated
constituents with bond dissociation energies higher than 670 kcal/tnole.
K019
Chlorobenzene, chloroform, 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrachloroethene,
1,1,1-trichloroethane, bis(2-chloroethyl5ether, p-dichlorobenzene, fluorene,
hexachloroethane, naphthalene, phenanthrene, 1,2,H,5-tetraehlorobenzene, and
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene were selected for regulation in K019 wastewater.
Carbon tetrachloride, 1,1-dichloroethane, trichloroethene, hexachloro-
butadiene, hexaehlorobenzene, and pentachlorobenzene were considered for
regulation but were not selected because these constituents were found in
lower concentrations in the untreated waste, and they are believed to be
adequately controlled by Incineration of other constituents which have been
selected for regulation. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
were considered for regulation but were not selected for regulation because
6-12
-------
these constituent3 are believed to be adequately controlled by incineration of
other constituents which have been selected for regulation. This decision was
based on a comparison of bond dissociation energies (BDE) of those constitu-
ents considered for regulation. EPA believes that carbon tetrachloride (SDE
380 kcal/mole), 1,1-dichloroethane {BDE 675 kcal/raole), trichloroethene (BDE
481 kcal/mole), 1,1,2-trichioroethane (BDE 670 kcal/mole), and 1,1,2,2-tetra-
chloroethane (BDE 665 kcal/mole) will be adequately controlled by regulation
of bis(2-chloroethyl)ether {BDE 1290 kcal/mole), chlorobenzene {BDE 1320
kcal/mole), and other regulated constituents with bond dissociation energies
greater than 670 kcal/mole. Hexachlorobutadiene (BDE 855 kcal/mole), hexa-
chloroben2ene {BDE 1310 kcal/mole), and pentachlorobenzene (BDE 1320
keal/nole) will be adequately controlled by regulation of chlorobenzene {BDE
1320 kcal/mole), p-dichlorobenzene (BDE 1330 kcal/mole), and other regulated
constituents with bond dissociation energies greater than 1320 kcal/mole.
Dichlorodifluoromethane, toluene, and di-n-butyl phthalate were not
detected in untreated K019 waste but were detected in the scrubber water
residual from rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant A {sampled by EPA).
These constituents were considered but not selected for regulation in K019
wastewater. Toluene and di-n-butyl phthalate were not selected for regulation
because they were present at treatable concentrations in other wastes that
were incinerated with K019 during the sampling episode at plant A. Dichloro-
difluoromethane may have been a contaminant from the process coolant system at
plant A since it was not detected in any of the wastes incinerated at plant A
during the sampling episode. EPA does not believe that this constituent was
6-13
-------
formed as a result of incineration of KQ19, since there is neither fluoride
nor a source of fluorine in K019. Therefore, dichlorodifluoromethane was not
selected for regulation.
K020
1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, and tetrachloroethene
were selected for regulation in K020 wastewater*. 1,1,2-triehloroethane was
considered for regulation but was not selected for regulation because it was
found at a lower concentration in the untreated waste, and it was believed to
be adequately controlled by incineration of other regulated constituents which
have been selected for regulation. This decision was based on a comparison of
bond dissociation energies (BDE) of those constituents considered for regula-
tion, EPA believes that 1,1,2-trichloroethane (BDE 670 kcal/mole) will be
adequately controlled by regulation of 1,2-dichloroethane (BDE 675 kcal/mole).
KQ3Q
Tetrachloroethene, o-dichlorobenzene, p-diehlorobenzene, hexachloro-
butadiene, hexachloroethane, pentachloroethane, 1,2,^,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene were selected for regulation in K030 wastewater.
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, hexachloropropene, and pentachlorobenzene were
considered for regulation but were not selected for regulation because these
constituents were found at lower concentration in the untreated waste, and
they are believed to be adequately controlled by incineration of other
6-14
-------
constituents which have been selected for regulation. This decision was based
on a comparison of bond dissociation energies (BDE) of those constituents con-
sidered for regulation. EPft believes that hexachlorocyclopentadiene (BDE 1020
keal/mole), hexachloropropene (BDE 710 kcal/mole), and pentachlorobenzene (BDE
1320 kcal/mole) will be adequately controlled by regulation of o-diehloro-
benzene (BDE 1330 kcal/raole), p-dichlorobenzene (BDE 1330 kcal/mole), 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene (BDE 1320 kcal/raole), and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (BDE 1325
kcal/mole).
6-15
-------
Table 6-1
STATUS OF BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
KOI 6
Volatilas
222. Acetone
1. Acetonltr1le
2, Acroleln
3. AeryIon1tr11 a
4. Benzene
5. Broinodlch I oromethane
6, Bromomethane
223, n-Butyl alcohol
7. Carbon tetrachlortde
8, Carbon dlsulflde
9, Chiorobenzena
10, 2-Chloro-l,3-but8dl»ne
11. ChIorodlbromomathane
12. Chloroethane
13. 2-ChloroethyI vinyl eth*r
14. Chloroform
IS. Chlorontathsne
16. 3-ChIoropropene
17. 1,2-D1brarao-3-Chlaropropane
18. I.2-Dlbromoethane
19. Dtbromomethane
20. t rans-1,4-DlchI oro-2-t»utene
21. OlchlorodlfIuoromethane
22. 1,I-D1chloroethana
23. 1 . 2-Dlchloroethane
24. 1 , I-Dlchloroethylane
25. trans-1,2-Dlchloraethene
26. 1.2-OtchIoropropane
27. trans-l,3~D1chlorapropane
28. cls-1,3-Dlchloropropane
29, 1 ,4-Dlonane
224. 2-Ethaxyathanoi
225. Ethyl acetate
226. Ethyl benzene
30. Ethyl cyanide
227. Ethyl ether
31. Ethyl mathacrylate
214. Etnylene oxide
Detect ion
Status
(ing/kg)
NO
NA
NA
NA
ND
NO
ND
NA
ND
NA
NO
NA
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
NA
NA
NA
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
64.
6.
3,
<5
KOI 8
Detect 1 on
Status
(mg/kg)
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
NO
NA
NO
NA
NO
000-180.000
NO
ND
500-<10,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NO
500-710.000
,000-96.000
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
KOI 9
Detect ion
Status
(ma/kfl)
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
3,500-<25.
ND
<2.000-<25.
ND
ND
NO
ND
4.6QQ-<2S,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
<2.000-<25,
87,000-500,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
000
000
000
000
000
KQ2Q
K030
DetectIon
Status
(ma/ha)
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
NO
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect 1 on
Status
(mg/kfl)
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
NO
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Not analyzed.
ND - Not detected.
NO* - This constituent was not detected In untreated waste but mas detected In the treated residual.
0 - This constituent was detected In the untreated waste. The concentration range detected Is available in the confidential
portion of the Administrative Record for this rulemaklng.
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OP BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
KG 16
KOI a
KOI9
K020
K030
Detect fon
Status
VolatI las (Cont.)
32. lodomethana
33. Isobutyl alcohol
228. Methanol
34. Methyl ethyl ketona
229. Methyl Isobutyl katone
35. Methyl methacry1 ate
37. MethacrylonltriIe
38. Mathy lane chloride
230. 2-N1tropropane
39. Pyrldlne
40. 1.1,1,2-Tetrachloroathane
41. I.1,2.2-T«tr*chloroethane
42, Tetrach1oroethena
43. Toluene
44. Tribromomethane
45. I,1,1-Trlchloroethane
46. 1,1,2-Trlchloroethane
47. Trtchloroethene
48. Tr1chloramonof1uoromathane
49. I.2,3-TrlchloropropBne
231 . 1.1 .2-Trlchloro-l.2.2-trifluoroethane
50. Vinyl chloride
215. 1,2-XyIene
216. 1,3-Xylen*
217. 1.4-Xylena
SemivoI at 1 las
51. Acenaphthalene
52. Acenaphthane
53. Acetophenone
54. 2-AcetylamlnofIuorene
55. 4-AmlnoblphenyI
56. Aniline
57. Anthracene
SB. Aramlta
59. Beni(a)anthracena
218. Benzal chloride
60. Benzenathlol
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kfl)
Detect 1 on
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
20,000-150,000
ND
NA
ND
NO
ND
NA
ND
NA
NO
ND
NO
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
<250-6.400
<250-23.000
NO
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
<2, 000- 130
6.000-<25
ND*
ND
<25, 000-81
<2,000-28
2,200-<25
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
NO
ND
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
Detect\on
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
D
D
ND
NA
ND
D
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect Ion
Status
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
D
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Not analyzed.
ND - Not detected.
ND*
This constituent was not detected In untreated waste but was detected 1n the treated residual.
D - Thts constituent mas detected In the untreated waste. The concentration ranee detected Is available in
portion of the Administrative Record for this ruIemaMng,
the confidential
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OF BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, KQ30 WASTES
KOI 6
KD18
KOI9
K020
K030
Semtvolat1 las (Cont.)
62.Benzo(a)pyrene
63. Benzo(b)f1uoranthene
64. BenzotanlIpery1ene
65. 8enzo(k)fluoranthene
66. p-BenioquI none
67. B\s(2-chIoroethoxy)ath«n«
68. Bls(2-chloroethyl)ath«r
69. B1s(2-chlorolsopropyI)ether
70. B1s(2-ethyIhexyIIphthaInte
71. 4-BromophanyI phenyI athen
72. Butyl benzyl phthalate
73. 2-sec-Butyl-4,fi-d1r»l trophenol
74. p-Chl oroaM line
75. Chiorooenzllate
76. p-Chloro-m-creBol
77. 2-ChloronaphthaIene
78, 2-ChlorophenoI
79. 3-Chloroproplonltrlle
80. Chryserie
81. ortho-C.r»soI
82. para-Cresol
232. Cyclohexanone
83. D1bBnz(a.h)anthracane
84, D1benzo(a.e)pyrene
8S. D1benzo(a,1)pyrene
86. m-Dlehlorobenzene
87. o-D1chlorobenzcne
88. p-D1chlorobenzene
89. 3,3'-D1ehlorobenzid1ne
90, 2.4-DtchIorophenoI
91. 2.6-DichIoropheno1
92, Dlethyl phthalate
93. 3,3'-Dtmethoxybenztdlne
94. p-DtmethyIamtnoazobenzene
95. 3,3--D1methyIbenzldlne
96. 2,4-D1methyl phenol
97, Dimethyl phthalate
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO
NO
NO
NA
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO
ND
NO
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect Ion
Status
(ma/ha)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO
NO
NO
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NO
NO
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detection
Status
(mg/hg)
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
<20-340
ND
ND*
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
<20-90
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Detect ion
Status
(mg/hg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NO
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect Ion
Status
(ma/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NO
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
D
D
NA
ND
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Not analyzed,
ND - Not detected,
ND* - This constituent was not detected In untreated *aste but was detected In the treated residua).
0 - This constituent was detected In the untreated waste. The concentration range detected Is available in the confidential
portion of the Administrative Record for this rulemaklng.
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OF BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
K016
KQ18
KO 19
K020
K030
SemivQlatl les (Cont.)
98. Dl-n-butyl phthalate
99. 1 ,4-D1n11robenzene
100. 4,6-Dlnltro-o-cr»sol
101. 2,4-D1n
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OF BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
KOI 6
K01B
K019
K020
K030
SemivoI at lies (Cont.)
133. N-N1trosop1per1tJ1ne
134. N-Nitrosopyrrolidlne
135. 5-N1tro-o-to1u1«Jine
136. Pentachlarobenzane
137. Pentach1oroethane
138. Pentachloronltrobenzene
139. PentachIoropheno)
140. Phanacatln
141. Phenanthrena
142. Phenol
220. PhthaMc anhydride
143. 2-PicoMne
144. Pronamlde
145. Pyrena
146. Resorclnol
147. Safrole
146. 1,2,4.5-TetrachIorodenzene
149. 2.3.4,6-TetrachtorophBnoI
150. 1,2,4-Tr1chIorodenzene
151. 2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
152. 2,4,6-Tr1ch1oropheno1
153. TrIs(2.3-dlbromopropyIIphosphate
Metals
154. Antimony
155. Arsenic
156. Barium
157. Beryl 1lum
15B. Cadmium
159. Chromium (total)
221. Chromium (hexavalent)
160. Copper
161. Lead
162. Mercury
163. Nickel
164. Selenium
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NO
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ion
Status
(mg/kfl)
NA
NA
NA
ND
300-<740
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ion
Status
(mfl/kflj
ND
ND
ND
<20-65
NO
ND
ND
ND
1 1-2)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
<20-86
ND
<20-100
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.9-0.97
ND
<0.3-0.63
1.8-5.3
ND
<1.0-3.6
2.3-3.5
ND
2.2-6.0
ND
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
D
O
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
D
ND
O
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Not analyzed.
ND - Not detected.
D - This constituent was detected In the untreated waste.
of the Administrative Record for this ru1amak1ng.
The concentration range detected is available in the confidential portion
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OF BDAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
KOI 6
HO 18
KOI 9
KD20
K030
I
fs)
Metals (Cont.)
165. Silver
166. Thallium
167. Vanadium
168. Zinc
Inprganlcs
169. Cyanide
170. Fluoride
171. SuIf1de
Organoch1 orIne Pesticides
172. Aldrln
173. alpha-BHC
174. b*ta-BHC
175. delta-BHC
176. gamma-BHC
177. Chlordane
178. ODD
179. DDE
180. DDT
181. DteldMn
182. Endosulfan I
183. Endosulfan II
104. Endrtn
185. Endrln aldehyde
186. Heptachlor
187. Heptacnlor epoxlde
188. Isodrin
189. Hepone
190. Methoxychlor
191. Toxaphene
Detect 1 on
Status
(mg/kfl)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect-ion
Status
(my/kg.)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ton
Status
(mg/kg)
ND
ND
ND
4,4-9,4
ND
ND
790
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ion
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -
ND -
Not
Not
analyzed.
detected.
-------
Table 6-1 (Continued)
STATUS OP BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN UNTREATED K016, K018-K020, K030 WASTES
K016
K018
K019
K020
K030
Phervo«yacet Ic Acid Herblddaa
192. 2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyacattc *dd
193. Silvan
194. 2,4,5-T
QrganophoaphorLis InsectIcldee
7951niaulfoton
196. Famphur
197. Methyl parathlon
198. Parathion
199. Phorote
Detect Ion
Status
(mg/kfl)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detection
Status
(mfl/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect ion
Status
(mg/hg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detection
Status
(ma/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Detect 1 on
Status
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCB8
200.
201 .
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
Dion
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212,
213.
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
1ns and Furona
Hex ach 1 orodl banzo-p-d 1 ox 1 ns
Hexach 1 orodlbenzof uran
Perttachl orod1benzo-p-d1ox 1ns
Pentoch) orodlbenzof uran
Tet rachl orodl benzo-p-cH o» 1 ns
Tet rachl orod Ibenzof uran
2 , 3,7.8-Tet r«chlorod1b*nzo-p-d1oxin
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA - Not analyzed.
ND - Not detected.
-------
Table 6-2
BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS CONSIDERED FOR REGULATION*
NONWASTEWATERS
KD16
42. Tetrachloroathane
110. Hexachlorobenzena
111. Hexuchlorobutadlena
1)2. He*achlorocyclopent-
adiane
113. Hexachloroethane
KQ1B
12. Chloroethane
15. Chloromethana
22. 1,1-D1ch)oroethaoB
23. I,2-Dfchloroethana
45. 1.1.1-Trlchloro--
ethane
46. 1 .1,2-Trlchloroethane
110. HexachIorobenzene
111. He«schlorobutedlene
113. HexachIoroathane
137. Pentacnloroethane
0s
K019
7. Carbon tatrachIorlde
9. ChIorobenzene
14. Chloroform
22. 1,1-D1chloroethane
23. 1. 2-DlcMoroethane
41. 1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroe-
thane
42. Tatraehloroathana
45. 1,1, i-Trlchloro-
thane
46. 1 . 1 .2-TrichIoroa-
thana
47. Trlchloroethena
68. B1s(2-chloroethyl)-
ether
70. Bls(2-«thylhexyl>-
phthalute
88. p-Dichlorobenzane
98. Dl-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorene
110. HenachIorobenzene
111. HexachIorobutacH ane
113. Henach 1 oroetherie
121. Naphtha I ana
136. PantachIorobenzene
141. Phenanthrena
148. 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
benzena
150. 1 ,2.4-Tr1chloroban-
zene
K02D
23. 1,2-Dichloroethana
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrach)aro«-
thane
42. TetrachIorouthene
46. 1,1,2 Trlch)oro-
ethane
K030
42. Tetrachloroathene
87. o-Dlch1orobanzane
88. p-Dlcti I orobunzena
111. Hexachlorobutadtene
112. Hexach1orocyc1opent-
ad1ar>e
113. HexachIoroethane
115. Hexach1oropropene
136. Pentachlorobanzane
137. PentachIoroethane
148. 1,2.4.5-Tetrachloro-
benztjne
150. 1,2.4-Trlchloroben-
zene
*A11 constituents on this list were detected In the K016. K01B, K019, K020, or K030 wastes and were either selected for regulation
(as shown In Table 5~3) or are believed to be controlled by regulation of another constituent.
-------
Table 6-2 (Continued)
BDAT LIST CONSTITUENTS CONSIDERED FOR REGULATION*
WASTEWATERS
KDjg
42. Tatrachloroethene
110, Henachlorobanzene
Ml. HenachlOrobutad!ena
112, Hexachlorocyclopent-
adIen«
113, Heaachloroethane
KO 18
12. Chioroethane
15. ChIorometnane
22. 1,l-Dichloroethane
23. 1 , 2-DlchIoroethane
45. 1 , I, 1-Trlchloro-
ethana
46. 1,1,2-TrichIoroethana
110, Hexachforobeniene
111, Haxachlorobutadlene
1)3, HexachIoroethane
137. PentachIoroethane
ON
I
K01Q
7. Carbon tetrachiorids
9. Ch1orobenzene
14. Chloroform
21. Dichlorodlfluoro-
muthane
22, 1,1-O1chloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethana
41, 1,1,2.2-Tetra-
chloroethane
42. Tetrachtoroethane
43. Toluene
45. I, 1 , 1-Trlchtoro-
etnane
46. I,1,2-Trlchloro-
Bthane
47. TrIchloroethane
68. B1s(Z-chloraathyl)-
ether
88 . p-DIch1orobenzene
98. Dl-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorana
110. Hexach1orobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadtene
113, H«jiach)oroathane
121. Naphthalene
136, Pentech Iorobenzene
141. Phananthrane
148. 1.2.4,5-Tetrochloro-
benzene
150. 1.2.4-TrIchIoroben-
23.
41.
42.
46,
KOgQ
1 , 2-Dlehloroethane
1 , 1 .2. 2-Tetrachloro-
Tetrachloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trlchloro-
ethane
42.
87.
8B .
lit.
112.
115.
136.
137.
14B,
150.
K030
Tetrachl oraathene
o-D1 ch l orobenzent)
p-D1 ch 1 or otoenzene
He«achlorocyc1opent-
adlene
HeKachlgropropene
Pentach I oroljenzene
Pentach 1 oraethane
1 ,2,4,5-TetrachIoro-
banzene
1 ,2 ,4-Trichtoroben-
zene
•All constituents on this list were detected In tha KOI6. K01S, KQ19. KQ2Q, or K030 wastes and were either selected for regulation
under the selection method considered for the final rule (as shown tn Table 5-4) or are baflaved to be controlled by regulation of
another constituent.
-------
Table 6-3
BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS SELECTED FOR REGULATION
NONWASTEWATERS
KOI 6
42. TetrachIorootnane
110. Hexachlorobenzena
111. Hexachlorobutad!ene
112. Hexachlorocyclopent-
udtene
113. Mexachloroethane
K01B
12. Chloroethane
22. 1,1-Dlchloroethane
23. I,2-01ch1oroethane
45, 1 ,1 .1-Trlchloro-
•thanA
110. Hexachlorobenzena
111. Hexach)orobutadlene
113. HaxachIoroethane
137. Pentachloroethane
K019
9. ChIorabenzene
14, Chloroform
23. 1,2-0lchlora8thane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. I.I. 1-Trlchloro-
ethane
6B. Bi*(2-chlDroathyJ)-
ether
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. Phenanthrene
150. 1,2,4-Tr1chIoroben-
zene
K020
23. t.2-OlChloroethane
41. 1, 1 ,2.2-Tetraehloro-
ethana
42. Tetrachloroethene
K03Q
42. Tatrachloroethene
111. HexachIorobutadiene
113. Hexachloroethane
115. Hexachloropropene
136. Pentachl orobertzene
137. PentachIoroethana
148. 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
benzane
150. 1 .2.4 TrSchloroben-
zene
I
to
-------
Table 6-
BOAT LIST CONSTITUENTS SELECTED FOR REGULATION
WASTEWATERS
KOI6
42. TetrachIoroethene
I 10. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadlene
112, He»acri I orocyc I opent-
adfena
113. Hexachloroethane
KOI 6
12, Chioroethane
15, Chioromathana
22, 1,I-D1chloroethane
23. 1,2-D1chIoroethane
45. 1.1,1-Trichloro-
ethane
110. Hexachlorobenzene
lit. Hexachlorobutadiene
137. Pentach)oroethane
KD19
9. Ch I orobenzene
14. Chloroform
23. 1,2-01chloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1 . 1 .1-Trlchloro-
ethane
68. B1s(2-chloroathyl)-
ether
88. p-Dtchlorobanzene
109. Fluoreno
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. Phununthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrechloro-
benzene
150. I ,2,4-TMchloroban-
zene
K020
23. 1.2-Dlchloroethane
41. 1.1,2.2-Tetrachloro-
ethane
42. Tetrach1oroethene
K030
42. Tetrachloroethene
87. o-D1ch1orobenzene
SB, p-DIChIOrobenzene
111, Hexachlorobutadiene
113. HexachIoroethane
137. Pentachluroethane
148. 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachloro*
benzene
150. 1 ,2,4-Trtchloroben-
zene
-------
7.0 CALCULATION OF TREATMENT STANDAHDS
In Section 5.0 of this document, the best demonstrated and available
technology for treatment of K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030 was chosen based
on available performance data. In Section 6.0, the regulated constituents
were selected in order to ensure effective treatment of the wastes. The
purpose of Section 7.0 is to calculate treatment standards for each of the
regulated constituents using the available treatment data from the BOAT treat-
ment technology. Included in this section is a step-by-step discussion of the
calculation of treatment standards for the nonwastewater and wastewater forms
of K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030.
Rotary kiln incineration was determined to be BDftT (see Section 5.0)
for KQ16, K018, K019, K020, and K030. Rotary kiln incineration generally
results in the generation of two treatment residuals: ash (a nonwastewater
form of K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030) and combustion gas scrubber water (a
wastewater form of K016, K018, K019, K020, and K030). The best measure of
performance for a destruction technology, such as rotary kiln incineration, is
the total amount of constituent remaining after treatment. Therefore, BOAT
treatment standards for organic constituents were calculated based on total
constituent concentration data.
7-1
-------
7.1 Calculationof Treatment StandardsforNonwastewater Forms of
K018, K019. K020. and K030
K019
The treatment standards for nonwastewater forma of K019 were calcu-
lated using six data sets from rotary kiln incineration of K019 waste. Table
7-1 presents the concentration values for organic constituents in the treat-
ment residual (ash) resulting from rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant
ft. Values are presented for constituents detected in the untreated K019 that
were used in development of treatment standards for K016, K018, KOI9, KQ20,
and K030 nonwastewaters. The concentration data presented in Table 7-1 have
been corrected to account for analytical recovery as described in Section 5.0.
Nonwastewater treatment standards were calculated for each regulated
constituent for K019 as shown in Table 7-4, The following three steps were
used to calculate the treatment standards: (1) The arithmetic average of the
corrected treatment values for each regulated constituent was calculated using
the six data points presented in Table 7-1. (2) Using these same data, a
variability factor was calculated that represents the variability inherent in
the performance of the treatment system, collection of treated samples, and
analysis of samples. Where concentrations in the treated waste were reported
as less than or equal to the detection limit for all the data points in the
data set, variability is still expected since the actual concentrations could
range from 0 to the detection limit. In these cases, the Agency assumed a
lognormal distribution of data points between the detection limit and a value
7-2
-------
1/10 of the detection limit and calculated a variability factor of 2.8. (3)
The treatment standard for each regulated constituent was calculated by
multiplying the arithmetic average of the corrected treatment valuea by the
variability factor. The analytical methods for analysis of each regulated
constituent in K019 are included in Table 7-4. A detailed discussion of these
analytical methods is presented in Appendix D (Analytical Qft/QC).
K016. K018. K02Q. and K030
Treatment performance data from rotary kiln incineration of K01&,
K018, K020, and K030 are not available. Therefore, the Agency is- transferring
performance data from the treatment of KOI9 at plant A to K016, K018, K020,
and K030. The calculations of treatment standards for K016, K018, K020, and
K030 are presented in Tables 7-2, 7-3, 7-5, and 7-6, respectively. The
transfer of treatment data is supported by the determination that K016, K018,
K019, K020, and K030 represent a single waste treatability group, as discussed
in Section 2.0. The determination of the waste treatability group is based on
the similarity In composition of the untreated wastes, the fact that all of
these wastes are generated by the organic chemicals industry, and the Agency's
belief that constituents present in these wastes can be treated to similar
concentrations using the same technology.
Where treatment data are available from treatment of K019 for a
regulated constituent in K016, K018, K020, and K030, the data were transferred
to that constituent to calculate the treatment standard for each waste code.
For example, 1,1-dichloroethane was selected for regulation in K018.
7-3
-------
1,1-Dichloroethane was detected in the untreated K019 at a concentration of
2,200 pptn and was treated to not detect values in the treatment residual (kiln
ash residue) from treatment of K019 at plant A, Treatment data (in this case,
not detect values) for 1,1-dichloroethane from K019 were transferred to
1,1-dlchloroethane in K018 to calculate the treatment standard. 1,1-Dichloro-
ethane was not selected for regulation in KQ19, however, because it was found
in lower concentrations in the untreated K019 waste compared with concentra-
tions of other constituents that were selected for regulation and because it
is believed to be adequately controlled by incineration of other constituents
that were selected for regulation. Treatment performance data were trans-
ferred in this way for most organic constituents in K016, KQ18, K020, and
K030.
Treatment performance data were not available from treatment of KOI 9
at plant ft for some regulated organic constituents in K016, K018, K020, and
K030. This is because the constituents selected for regulation for each waste
code are based on available waste characterization data. Not all regulated
constituents in K016, K018, K020, and K030 were detected in the K019 treated
at plant A. The Agency believes that it would be inappropriate to base
treatment standards on not detect values in the treatment residual of K019 if
the constituent was not detected in the untreated KQ19. In such cases, data
were transferred to that organic constituent from another organic constituent
that was detected in the untreated KOI9 based on the boiling points of the
constituents, (Boiling point is a waste characteristic that affects the
performance of rotary kiln incineration as discussed in Section 3,1*. Appendix
E presents information on waste characteristics that affect performance.) The
7-4
-------
constituent with the same OP the closest higher boiling point for which the
Agency had treatment performance data from KQ19 at plant A was selected for
transfer of data. Cases where such a transfer of data occurred are summarized
below and are noted on Tables 7-2, 7-3t 7-5, and 7-6, which show the calcu-
lations of the treatment standards for K016, K0l8f K020, and K030,
respectively.
12. Chloroethane(KO18). The treatment standard for chloroethane
(bp 12°C) in K018 is based on data transferred from treatment of chloroform
(bp 61°C) in KQ19. Based on the discussion of waste characteristics affecting
treatment performance of rotary kiln incineration in Section 3-4, the Agency
expects that chloroethane can be treated to concentration levels as low or
lower than chloroform.
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (K020). The treatment standard for
1,1,2,2-tetraehloroethane (bp 147°C) in K020 is based on data transferred from
treatment of bia(2-chloroethyl)ether (bp 178°C) in K019. Based on the discus-
sion of waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary kiln
incineration in Section 3.4, the Agency expects that 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
can be treated to concentration levels as low or lower than bis(2-chloro-
ethy1)ether.
111. Hexachlorobutadiene (K016, K018, K030). The treatment stan-
dard for hexachlorobutadiene (bp 215°C) in K016, K018, and K030 is based on
data transferred from treatment of naphthalene (bp 218°C) in K019. Based on
7-5
-------
the discussion of waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of
rotary kiln incineration in Section 3-4, the Agency expects that hexachloro-
butadiene can be treated to concentration levels as low or lower than
naphthalene.
112. jjexachlgrocyclopentadiene (KO16). The treatment standard for
hexachlorocyclopentadiene (bp 231°C) in K016 is based on data transferred from
treatment of phenanthrene (bp 34Q°C} in KQ19- Based on the discussion of
waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary kiln inciner-
ation in Section 3.^, the Agency expects that hexachlorocyclopentadiene can be
treated to concentration levels as low or lower than phenanthrene.
115. Hexachloropropene (K030). The treatment standard for hexa-
chloropropene (bp 209°C) in K030 is based on data transferred from treatment
of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (bp 213°C) in K019. Based on the discussion of
waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary kiln incinera-
tion in Section 3.^, the Agency expects that hexachloropropene can be treated
to concentration levels as low or lower than 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.
137. Pentachloj-oethane (KOI8, K030). The treatment standard for
pentachloroethane (bp l6l°C) in KQ18 and K030 la based on data transferred
from treatment of bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (bp 1?8°C) in K019. Based on the
discussion of waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary
kiln incineration in Section 3-H, the Agency expects that pentachloroethane
7-6
-------
can be treated to concentration levels as low or lower than bis(2-chloro-
ethyl)ether.
7.2 Calcula.tion of Treatment Standards for WaatewateT FQrm3_of_ K016,
K018. K019. K020. and K03Q
K019
The treatment standards for wastewater forms of K019 were calculated
using six data seta from rotary kiln incineration of K019. Table 7-7 presents
the concentration values for organic constituents in the treatment residual
(scrubber water) resulting from rotary kiln incineration of K019 at plant A.
Values are presented for constituents (detected in the untreated K019) that
were used in development of treatment standards for K016, K018, K019, K020,
and K030 wastewaters. The concentration data presented in Table 7-7 have been
corrected to account for analytical recovery as described in Section 5.0.
Wastewater treatment standards were calculated for each regulated
constituent for K019 as shown in Table 7-10. The following three steps were
used to calculate the treatment standards: (1) The arithmetic average of the
corrected treatment values for each regulated constituent was calculated using
the six data points presented in Table 7-7. (2) Using these same data, a
variability factor was calculated that represents the variability inherent in'
the performance of the treatment system, collection of treated samples, and
analysis of samples. Where concentrations in the treated waste were reported
7-7
-------
as less than or equal to the detection limit for all the data points in the
data set, variability is still expected since the actual concentrations could
range from 0 to the detection limit. In these cases, the Agency assumed a
lognormal distribution of data points between the detection limit and a value
1/10 of the detection limit and calculated a variability factor of 2.8.
(3) The treatment standard for each regulated constituent was calculated by
multiplying the arithmetic average of the corrected treatment values by the
variability factor. The analytical methods upon which the treatment standards
for K019 are based are included in Table 7-10. A detailed discussion of these
analytical methods is presented in Appendix D (Analytical QA/QC).
K016, K018. K020. and K030
Treatment performance data from rotary kiln incineration of K016,
K018, K020, and K030 are not available. Therefore, the Agency is transferring
data from the treatment of K019 at plant A to K016, K018, K020, and K030. The
calculations of treatment standards for K016, K018, K020, and K030 are pre-
sented in Tables 7-8, 7-9, 7-11, and 7-12, respectively. The transfer of
treatment data is supported by the determination that K016, K018, K019, K020,
and K030 represent a single waste treatability group, as discussed in Section
2.0. The determination of the waste treatability group is based on the
sinilarity in composition of the untreated wastes, the fact that all of these
wastes are generated by the organic chemicals industry, and the Agency's
belief that constituents present in these wastes can be treated to similar
concentrations using the same technology.
7-8
-------
Where treatment data are available from treatment of K019 for a
regulated constituent in K016, K018, K020, and K030, the data were transferred
to that constituent to calculate the treatment standard for each waste code.
For example, 1,1-dichloroethane was selected for regulation in K018.
1,1-Dichloroethane was detected in the untreated K019 at a concentration of
2,200 ppm and was treated to not detect values in the treatment residual
(combustion gas scrubber water) from treatment of K019 at plant A, Treatment
data (in this case: not detect values) for 1,1-dichlaroethane from K019 were
transferred to 1,1-dichloroethane in K018 to calculate the treatment standard.
1,1-Dichloroethane was not selected for regulation in K019i however, because
it was found in lower concentrations in the untreated K019 waste compared with
concentrations of other constituents that were selected for regulation and
because it is believed to be adequately controlled by incineration of other
constituents that were selected for regulation. Treatment performance data
were transferred in this way for most organic constituents in K016, K018,
K020, and K030.
Treatment performance data were not available from treatment of KOI9
at plant A for some regulated organic constituents in K016, K018, K02Q, and
K030. This is because the constituents selected for regulation for each waste
code are based on available waste characterization data. Not all regulated
constituents in K016, K018, K020, and K030 were detected in the K019 treated
at plant A. The Agency believes that it would be Inappropriate to base
treatment standards on not detect values in the treatment residual of K019 if
the constituent was not detected in the untreated K019. In such cases, data
7-9
-------
were transferred to that organic constituent from another organic constituent
that was detected in the untreated KQ19 based on the bond dissociation energy
of the constituents, (Bond dissociation energy (BDE) is a waste character-
istic that affects the performance of rotary kiln incineration as discussed in
Section 3.4.) The constituent with the same or the closest higher bond
dissociation energy for which the Agency had treatment data from K019 at plant
A was selected for transfer of data. Cases where such a transfer of data
occurred are summarized below and are noted on Tables 7-8, 7-9, 7-11t anQ<
7-12, which show the calculations of the treatment standards for K016, K018,
K020, and K030, respectively.
T.2.. Chloroethane (K018). The treatment standard for chloroethane
(BDE 665 kcal/mol) in K018 is based on data transferred from treatment of
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (BDE 1,290 kcal/mol) in K019. Based on the discussion
of waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary kiln
incineration in Section 3-1, the Agency expects that chloroethane can be
treated to concentration levels as low or lower than bis(2-chloroethyl)ether,
15._ _Chloromethane (KQ18). The treatment standard for chloromethane
(BDE 380 kcal/nol) in K018 is based on data transferred from treatment of
tetrachloroethene (BDE 461 kcal/mol) in K019. Baaed on the discussion of
waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary kiln incinera-
tion in Section 3.^, the Agency expects that chloromethane can be treated to
concentration levels as low or lower than tetrachloroethene.
7-10
-------
m. 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane (K02Q). The treatment standard for
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (BDE 605 kcal/nol) in K020 is based on data trans-
ferred from treatment of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (BDE 625 kcal/mol) in K019.
Based on the discussion of waste characteristics affecting treatment per-
formance of rotary kiln incineration in Section 3.^, the Agency expects that
1,1,2,2-tetraehloroethane can be treated to concentration levels as low or
lower than 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
87. o-Dichlorobenzene (K030). The treatment standard for o-dichlo-
robenzene (BDE 1,325 kcal/nol) in K030 is based on data transferred from
treatment of p-dichlorobenzene (BDE 1,325 kcal/mol) in K019. Baaed on the
discuaaion of waste characteristics affecting treatment performance of rotary
kiln incineration in Section 3.4, the Agency expects that o-dichlorobenzene
can be treated to concentration levels as low or lower than p-dichlorobenzene.
111. Hexachlorobutadiene (K016. K018, KQ30). The treatment stan-
dard for hexachlorobutadiene (BDE 853 keal/mol) in K016, K018, and K030 is
based on data transferred from treatment of bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (BDE 1,290
kcal/nol) in K019. Based on the discussion of waste characteristics affecting
treatment performance of rotary kiln incineration in Section 3-^» the Agency
expects that hexachlorobutadiene can be treated to concentration levels as low
or lower than bis(2-chloroethyl)ether,
112. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (K016). The treatment standard for
hexaehlorocyelopentadiene (BDE 1,020 kcal/mol) in K016 is based on data
7-11
-------
transferred from treatment of bis(2-chloroethyl)ether {BDE 1,290 kcal/mol) in
K019. Baaed on the discussion of waste characteristics affecting treatment
performance of rotary kiln incineration in Section 3.^, the Agency expects
that hexaehlorocyclopentadiene can be treated to concentration levels as low
or lower than bis(2-chloroethyl)ether.
137. Pentachloroethane (KO18, K030). The treatment standard for
pentachloroethane (BDE 585 kcal/mol) in K018 and K030 is based on data trans-
ferred from treatment of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (BDE 625 kcal/mol) in K019.
Based on the discussion of waste characteristics affecting treatment per-
formance of rotary kiln incineration in Section 3.U, the Agency expects that
pentachloroethane can be treated to concentration levels as low or lower than
1,1,1-trichloroethane,
7-12
-------
Table 7-1
CORRECTED TOTAL CONCENTRATION DATA
FOR ORGANICS IN ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR ASH FROM TREATMENT OF K019
Corrected Concentrations**
In the Treated Waste, ppm
Constituent*
Volatiles
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
22. 1,1-Dlchloroethane
23. 1,2-Dlchloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1»1,1-Tr ichloroethane
Senivolatlies
1
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
~^~
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
4
2.02
2,13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
5
2.02
2.13
2.13
2,13
2.13
2.13
6
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
68.
110.
113.
121.
136.
141.
148.
150.
Big(2-ehloroethyl5ether 2
Hexachlorobenzene 10
Hexachloroethane 10
Naphthalene 2
Pentaehlorobenzene 10
Phenanthrene 2
1,2,4, 5-Tetrachlorobenzene 5
1,2, 4-Tr Ichlorobenzene 6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.67
2
10
10
2
10
2
5
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.67
2
10
10
2
10
2
5
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.67
2
10
10
2
10
2
5
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
,67
2
10
10
2
10
2
5
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.67
2.00
10
10
2.00
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
•Constituents present In untreated K019.
••Constituent concentrations have been adjusted to account for analytical
recoveries ("corrected") as discussed in Section 5.0.
7-13
-------
Table 7-2
CALCULATION OF NQNWASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR KOI6
K019 Constituent
From Which Treatment
Data Were Transferred
Tetrachloroethene
Regulated Constituent
(Sy-846 Method Number)'
Volatiles (8240)
(Total Concentration)
42. Tetrachloroethene
Semivolatiles (8270)
(Total Concentration)
110. Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene
112. Hexachlorocyclopenta- Phenanthrene
diene
113. Hexachloroetnane Hexachloroethane
Untreated
Concentration*
(ppm)
6.00-78,000
60-87
311-470
11-21
85-120
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
2.13
10
2.00
2.00
10
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
(Average x VF)
(ppm)
6.0
28
5.6
5.6
28
For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
•This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
**The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-3
CALCULATION OF NONHASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR KOI8
Regulated Constituent
(SW-816 Method Number)1
Volatlles (8210)
(Total Concentration)
12. Chlo roe thane
22. 1, 1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
15. 1,1, 1-Trlchloroe thane
Semlvo la tiles (8270)
(Total Cojicentrattonl
110. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. Hexaehloroethane
137. Pentachloroethane
K019 Constituent
From Which Treatment
Data Here Transferred
Chloroform
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-Dlchloroethane
1,1, 1-Tr ichloroe thane
Hexachlorobenzene
Naphthalene
He xach lor oe thane
Bis( 2-chloroethy 1 )ether
Untreated
Concentration*
(ppm)
1,600-6,000
<2 ,000-2 ,200
87,000-122,000
2,200-3,210
60-87
311-170
85-120
280-310
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment Variability
Values**
(ppra)
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
10
2.00
10
2.00
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
(Average x VF)
(ppm)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
28
5.6
28
5.6
'For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
*This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
**The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-4
CALCULATION OP N0NWASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K019
Regulated Constituent
(Sy-846 Method Number)1
Volatilea (8240)
(Total Concentration)
9. Chlorobenzene
11. Chloroform
23. 1,2-Dlchloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1»1,1-TpIchloroethane
SemivolatUea (8270)
(Total Concentration)
68. Bi3(2-chloroethyl)ether
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. Phenanthrene
150. 1,2,4-Tr tchlorobenzene
Untreated
K019
at Plant A*
(ppm)
<2000-3000
4600-6000
87000-122000
6000-78000
2200-3210
280-340
85-120
314-470
11-21
65-100
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
2.02
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.00
10
2.00
2.00
6.67
Treatment
Variability Standard**
Factor (Average x VF)
(ppm)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.6
28
5.6
5.6
19
•Concentration values for the untreated waste have not been corrected for recovery.
For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
**The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
I
l-l
-M
Regulated Constituent
(SW-&H6 Method Number)1
Volatiiea (82*10)
(Total Concentration)
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
HI. 1,1,2,2-fetrachlo-
roethane
J|2. Tetrachloroethene
Table 7-5
CALCULATION OF NONWASTEUATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K020
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values*"
(ppm)
K019 Constituent
Prom Which Treatment
Data Here Transferred
Untreated
Concentrat ion*
(ppm)
Variability
Factor
(VF)
1,2-Dichloroethane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)-
ether
Te trachloroethene
87,000-122,000
280-3HO
6,000-78,000
2.13
2.00
2.13
Semivolatiles (8270)
(Total Concentration)
No semivolatile organics are being proposed for regulation for this waste code.
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard"
(Average x VF)
(ppm)
6.0
5.6
6.0
Tor detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
* This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
""The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-6
CALCULATION OF NGNHASTEHATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K030
I
l->
CO
Regulated Constituent
(SH-816 Method Number)1
Volatilea (8210)
(Total Concentration)
12. Tetrachloroethene
Semivolatlies (8270)
(Total Concentration)
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. ttexachloroethane
115. Hexachlorppropene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
137. Pentachloroethane
148, 1,2,1,5-Tetraehlo-
robenzene
150. 1,2,»t-Trlchloi"0-
benzene
1
K019 Constituent
Proa Which Treatment
Data Here Transferred
Untreated
Concentration*
(ppm)
Tetrachloroethene
6,000-78,000
Naphthalene
Hexachloroethane
1,2,1-Triehlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Bl3(2-chloroethyl)ether
1,2,1,5-Tetraehloro-
benzene
1,2,1-TrIchlorobenzene
65-100
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
2.13
314-J470
85-120
65-100
51-65
280-310
62-86
2.00
10
6.67
10
2.00
5.00
6.67
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
(Average x VF)
(ppm)
6.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
5.6
28
19
28
5.6
19
For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section),
* This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
••The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-7
CORRECTED TOTAL COMPOSITION DATA FOR ORGANICS
IN ROTARY KILN SCRUBBER WATER FROM TREATMENT OF K019
Constituent*
Volatiles
9. Chlorobenzene
14. Chloroform
22, 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Semivoj atiles
68. Big(2-chloroethyl)ether
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
113. Hexachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
Corrected Concentration in
the Treated Waste, ppm
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
.002
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.002
.003
.002
.012
.012
.002
.002
.006
.008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
.002
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.002
.003
.002
.012
.012
.002
.002
.006
.008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
.002
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.002
.003
.002
.012
.012
.002
.002
.006
.008
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4
002
003
003
003
003
003
002
003
002
012
012
002
002
006
008
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5
002
003
003
003
003
003
002
003
002
012
012
002
002
006
008
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
.002
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
0.002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.003
.002
.012
.012
.002
.002
.006
.008
•Constituents proposed for regulation and present in untreated K019.
7-19
-------
Table 7-8
CALCULATION OF WASfEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K016
•si
o
K019 Constituent From
Which Treatment Data
Here Transferred
Tetrachloroethene
Regulated Constituent
(SW-846 Method Number)1
Volatiles (8240)
(Total Concentrationl
42. Tetrachloroethene
Seoivolatiles (8270)
(Total Concentration
110. Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene Bis(2-chioroethy1)ether
112. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
113. Hexachloroethane Hexachloroethane
Untreated
Concen trat ion*
(ppm)
6,000-78,000
60-87
280-340
280-340
85-120
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
0.003
0.012
0.002
0.002
0.012
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
( Average
x VF)Jjapm)
0.007
0.033
0.007
0.007
0.033
1 For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
*This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were transferred.
**The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-9
CALCULATION OF WASTEWATEH TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR KOI8
-•a
i
to
Regulated Constituent
(SM-846 Method Number)'
Volatiles (8240)
(Total Concentration)
12. Chloroethane
15. Chloromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
45. 1,1,1-Triehloroethane
Semivolatile3 (8270)
(Total Concentration)
110, Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
137. ' Pentachloroethane
KOI9 Constituent From
Which Treatment Data
Here Transferred
Bi3(2-chloroethyl)ether
Tetrachloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Hexachlorobenzene
Bi s(2-chloroethy1)ether
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
Untreated
ConcentratIon*
(ppm)
280-340
6,000-78,000
<2,000-2,200
87,000-122,000
2,200-3,210
60-87
280-3,400
2,200-3,210
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.012
0.002
0.003
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
(Average
x VFHppm)
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.033
0.007
0.007
IFor detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
•This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
"The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-10
Regulated Constituent
(SH-846 Method Number)1
Volatiles (8240)
(Total Concentration)
9. Chlorobenzene
14, Chloroform
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethene
45. 1,1,1-TrIchloroethane
Semivolatiles (82?0)
(Total Concentration)
68.Bis(2-chloroethy1)ether
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
109. Fluorene
113. Hejcachloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. " Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
CALCULATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K019
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
Untreated KOI9
at Plant A* (ppm)
<2,000-3,000
4,600-6,000
87,000-122,000
6,000-78,000
2,200-3,210
280-340
74-90
16-22
85-120
314-470
11-21
62-86
65-100
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.012
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.008
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard1*
(Average
x vPHppm)
0.006
0.007
0.00?
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.008
0.007
0.033
0.007
0.007
0.017
0.023
1 For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
•Concentration values for the untreated waste have not been corrected for recovery,
"The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
Table 7-11
CALCULATION OF HASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K020
Regulated Constituent
(SU-8H6 Method Number)1
Volatlles (8210)
jTotal Concentration)
23. 1,2-Dlchloroethane
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
42. Tetraehloroethene
K019 Constituent From
Which Treatment Data
Here Transferred
1,2-Dlchloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Tet rachlo roe t hene
Untreated
Concentration*
(ppm)
87,000-122,000
2,200-3,210
6,000-78,000
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values**
(ppm)
0.003
0.003
0.003
Variability
Factor
(VF)
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard**
(Average
x VFHppm)
0,007
0.007
0.007
i
ISJ
Semivolatiles (8270)
TotalConcentrations
No semlvolatile organics are being regulated for this waste code.
1For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
•This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were transferred.
•"The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
i
K>
Table 7-12
CALCULATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR K030
Regulated Constituent
(SH-846 Method Number)1
Volatiles (8240)
(Total Concentration)
12. Tetrachloroethene
Semivolatiles (8270)
{(Total Concentration)
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
113. Hexachloroetharte
137. Pentachloroethane
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetraehlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
K019 Constituent From
Which Treatment Data
Here Transferred
Tetrachloroethene
Untreated
Concentration*
(ppm)
6,000-78,000
p-Dichiorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Hexachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2,1,5-Tetraehlorobenzene
1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
74-90
74-90
280-340
85-120
2,200-3,210
62-86
65-100
Arithmetic
Average of
Corrected
Treatment
Values"•
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.012
0.003
0.006
0.008
Variability
Factor
(VP)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Treatment
Standard"
(Average
x VFHppm)
0.00?
0.008
0.008
0.007
0.033
0.007
0.017
0.023
1For detailed discussion of the analytical methods upon which these treatment standards are based, see
Appendix D (QA/QC section).
•This is the untreated concentration in K019 of each constituent from which treatment data were
transferred.
••The values shown on this table for arithmetic averages and treatment standards have been rounded to show
significant figures only.
-------
8.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
f
This document was prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste, by Radian Corporation, under Contract No.
68-01-7053. Mr. James Berlow, Chief, Treatment Technology Section, Waste
Treatment Branch, served as the EPA Program Manager during the preparation of
this document and the development of treatment standards for the K016, K018,
KQ19, K02Q, and K030 wastes. The EPA technical project officer for the wastes
was Ms. Lisa Jones. Mr. Steven Silverman served as EPA legal advisor.
The following personnel from Versar, Inc. and Radian Corporation
were involved in preparing this document: Mr. Jerome Sfcrauss, Program Manger,
Versar; Mr. David Pepson, Senior Technical Reviewer, Versar; Mr. Mark Hereth,
Project Director, Radian; Ms. Margaret Longo, Project Secretary, Radian, and
the Radian engineering team, Ms. Lori Stoll, Ms. Heidi Welner, Ms. Debra
Falatko, and Ms. Christina Hong.
The KQ19 treatment test was executed at the Rollins Facility in Deer
Park, Texas by Radian Corporation. Field sampling for the test was conducted
under the leadership of Ms. Lori Stoll of Radian; laboratory coordination was
also provided by Ms. Lori Stoll.
We greatly appreciated the cooperation of the individual companies
who submitted detailed information to the U.S. EPA on these waste codes.
-------
-------
9.0 REFERENCES
1. SRI International. 198? Directory of Chemical Producers-United States of
America, SRI International, Menlo Park, California. 1987.
2. Kent, James A., ed. Reigel'3 Handbook of Industrial Chemistry, 8th ed.
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. 1983.
3. Kirk, Raymond E., and Othmer, Donald F. Encyclopedia of Chemical^Tech-
nology, third edition. John Wiley and Sons. 1979.
U. Lowenheim, F., and M. Moran. Faith, Keyea, and Clark's Industrial
Chemicals, Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons. 1975.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste under RCRA. Subtitle C, Section 3001^ BackgroundDocu-
ment. May 1981.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Contractors Engineering Analysis
of Organic Chemicals and Plastics/Synthetic Fibers Industries, Appendix
S, Chapters 27, 75 and 79. Effluent Guidelines Division. November 16,
1981.
7. IT Enviroscience. Organic Chemical Manufacturing Volume 8: Selected
Processes. EPA-450/3-8Q-028c. Prepared for U.S. EPA, Emission Standards
and Engineering Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
September 1980.
8. TRW Systems Group. Assessment of IndustrialHazardous Waste Practices.
Organic Chemicals, Pesticides, and Explosive Industries. Prepared for
U.S. EPA. April 1975.
9. Environ Corporation. Characterization of Haste Streams Listedin the HO
CFR Section 261 Haste Profiles. Prepared for U.S. EPA, Waste Identifica-
tion Branch, Characterization and Assessment Division.
10. U.S. EPft. Onalte Engineering Report of Treatment Technology Performance
and Operation forRollins Environmental Services (TX) Inc., Deer Park,
Texas. March 11, 1988.
11. S-Cubedf 1988. Data Summary Tables of Selected Chlorinated Aliphatic
Waste Samples as Extracted from Analytical Data Report of the EPA/OSW
Study to Relist Selected Hazardous Waste from the Chlorinated Aliphatic
Industry.February 26, 1988.
12. Dean, J.A. (ed), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry. 12th ed.t McGraw-Hill,
1979. pp. 8-11.
9-1
-------
13. McCabe and Smith, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineeringr Ird ed..'
McGraw-Hill, 1976, App. 13.
1U. Sanderson, R.T., Chemical Bonds and Bond Energy, Arizona State Univer-
sity, Academic Press, New York and London, 1971.
15. Windholz, Martha, editor. 1983- The Merck Index. 10th edition,
Rathway, NJ: Merck i Company.
16. Verchueren, Karel. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic
Chemical3. 2nd edition, pp. 575-576.NY"!Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company, Inc.
17. Weast, R.C., editor. 1980. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 61st
edition, p. C-13^. ioca Raton=, =FL: CRC "Press, Inc.
18. Waste-Tech Services, Inc. 1988. Waste-Tech Comments on EPA's proposed
rule, "Land Disposal Restriction for First Third of Scheduled Wastes."
Submitted to EPA RCRA Docket F-38-LDR7-FFFFF. Comment Mo. L0R7QQQ18.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
19. Waste-Tech Services, Inc. 1988. Waste-Tech Part II Hazardous Waste
Facility Permit Application. Appendix V: sludge incinerator burn plan,
April 29, 1987.
20. Waste-Tech Services, Inc. 1988. Stationary source sampling reports.
Prepared for Waste-Tech Services by Entropy Environmental1, Inc'. SU No. 2
incinerator stack. Volume I, II, III. October 6 through" 9, 1987.
21. Waste-Tech Services, Inc. Correspondence from Mr. Ton Atwood of
Waste-Tech Services, Inc. to Ms. Joan Albritton of Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality. September 28, 1987.
9-2
-------
APPENDIX A
STATISTICAL METHODS
A.1 F Value Determination for ANOVA Test
A,2 Variability Factor
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
A.I F Value Determination for ANQVA Test
As noted earlier in Section 1.0, EPA is using the statistical method
known as analysis of variance in the determination of the level of
performance that represents "best" treatment where more than one
technology is demonstrated. This method provides a measure of the
differences between data sets. If the differences are not statistically
significant, the data sets are said to be homogeneous.
If the Agency found that the levels of performance for one or more
technologies are not statistically different (i.e., the data sets are
homogeneous), EPA would average the long term performance values achieved
by each technology and then multiply this value by tht largest
variability factor associated with any of the acceptable technologies.
If EPA found that one technology performs significantly better (i.e., the
data sets are not homogeneous), BOAT would be the level of performance
achieved by the best technology multiplied by its variability factor.
To determine whether any or all of the treatment performance data
sets are homogeneous using the analysis of variance method, it is
necessary to compare a calculated "F value" to what is known as a
"critical value." (See Table A-l.) These critical values are available
in most statistics texts (see, for example, Statistical Concepts and
Methods by Bhattacharyya and Johnson, 1977, John Wiley Publications, New
York).
Where the F value is less than the critical value, all treatment data
sets are homogeneous. If the f value exceeds the critical value, it is
A-l
-------
necessary to perform a "pair wise F" tast to determine if any of the sets
are homogeneous. The "pair wise F" test must be done for all of the
various combinations of data sets using the same method and equation as
the genera] F test.
The f value is calculated as follows:
(i) All data are natural logtransformed.
(ii} The sura of the data points for each data set is computed (T,).
(iii) The statistical parameter known as the sura of the squares
between data sets (SSB) is computed:
k
k f T,2 }
SSS
k
I
i-I
N
2
where:
k » number of treatment technologies
H| * number of data points for technology i
N > number of data points for all technologies
T| » sum of natural logtransformed data points for each technology.
(iv) The sum of the squares within data sets (SSU) is computed:
I ni
*i i « the natural logtransformed observations (j) for treatment
technology (i).
(v) The degrees of freedom corresponding to SSB and SSW are
calculated. For SSB, tht dtgret of freedom is given by k-1. For SSH,
the degree of freedom is given by H-k.
SSH -
where:
k nj _
.1, .1 * M
i-i j-1
k
-,5,
A-2
-------
(vi) Using the above parameters, the F value is calculated as
follows:
MSB
F . MSW
where :
MSB - SS8/(k-l) and
MSW - SSW/(N-kJ.
A computational table summarizing the above parameters 1s shown below,
Computational Table for the F Value
Source
Between
Within
Degrees of
freedom
K-l
N-k
Sum of
squares *
SSB
SSW
Mean square
MSB - SSB/k-l
MSW - SSW/N-k
F
MSB/MSW
Below are three examples of the ANOVA calculation. The first two
represent treatment by different technologies that achieve statistically
similar treatment; the last example represents a case where one
technology achieves significantly better treatment than the other
technology,
A-3
-------
Table A-l
F Distribution at th§ 95 Percent Confidence Level
Otnomiruro*
Org'tn el
f'twom
1
2
3
4
3
§
7
a
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
18
1 7
18
It
20
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
21
23
30
40
80
UO
ao
1
161 4
1891
1013
7 71
881
599
539
532
5.12
498
434
4 73
45?
480
434
449
443
441
4J8
433
432
430
42S
428
424
423
421
420
418
41?
401
400
392
3.84
2
1995
1900
959
894
379
514
474
448
428
410
398
319
3H
374
188
383
359
359
3.92
349
347
344
342
3.40
3.39
117
3 33
134
133
332
323
3.19
307
300
3
2197
1918
928
• 59
341
4 '8
433
407
388
3.71
359
349
341
334
329
324
120
318
3t3
310
30?
303
303
301
299
291
298
299
193
292
214
2.71
2.81
180
Num«» Ito/
4
2248 ,
1925
912
8.39
5.19
453
412
3.34
3.83
348
3.38
121
3.H
3.11
308
301
198
193
290
287
184
292
210
178
2.78
2.74
173
171
170
299
2.81
191
143
137
df^rt**
5
2302
19.30
901
828
509
439
39?
389
348
333
3.20
3.11
303
194
190
189
211
2.7?
174
171
2.81
2.68
2.84
292
250
259
2.57
258
2.59
233
145
137
2,29
121
9
2340
19.33
894
8.18
499
428
38?
331
3.37
322
3,09
3.00
192
183
171
174
170
184
113
ISO
19?
139
133
2-91
249
147
2.48
149
143
242
234
223
lit
110
7
2388
1933
889
8.09
481
421
3.79
3.50
329
3.14
3.01
191
183
178
2.71
184
181
291
194
1SI
149
2,44
144
2.42
2.40
139
13?
131
139
133
221
2.17
10S
101
8
2389
1937
US
8.94
482
413
373
344
123
3.07
19S
2.83
2.7?
170
2.84
139
153
231
2*8
I4i
2.42
2.40
137
134
2-34
132
131
129
121,
2.27
111
HO
102
194
9
2405
1938
a 11
9.00
47?
410
331
339
318
3.02
190
280
2.71
2.11
2i9
294
249
148
142
239
237
234
232
130
128
2.27
125
124
122
2.21
2.12
204
1 98
181
A-4
-------
1790g
Sum:
Exanpla 1
Hethylww Chlortda
s
[nf luant
(«/l>
15SQ.OO
1290.00
1640.00
5100.00
1450.00
4600.00
17SO.OO
2400,00
4300.00
12100.00
Eff1u«ni
(WJ/D
10.30
10 00
10.90
12.00
10.00
10. 90
10.00
10.00
10. M
10.00
In(efflucnt) [
2-30
2.30
2.30
2.48
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
In(sfflutnt)]2
5.29
5.29
S.29
6.15
5.29
5.29
5.29
5.29
5.29
5.29
Inf lutmt
U9/ U
1960.00
2568.00
1817.00
1640.00
3907.00
Biological treatment
Efflumt In(tff1u«it]
bg/U
10.00 2.30
10.00 2.30
10.00 2.30
26.00 3. 28
10.00 2.30
[In(tfflyent)]2
5.29
5.23
5.29
10.63
5.29
23, la
53,76
12.46
31,71
10
Mian:
3S69
10
10.2
Standard Deviation:
3328.57 .S3
1.15
10
2.32
.as
2378
923.04
13.2
1. IS
2.49
.43
ANOVA Calculations:
ssa <
W
SSM <
MSB • SSBX(k-l)
NSW '
A-5
-------
Example 1 (continued)
F • MSB/MSW
when:
k * number of treatment technologies
5 • nufltoer of data points for ttennology t
N " number of natural log transformed data points for all
T * sun of log trinjformed data points for each technology
X » the net. log transformed observations (j) for treatment technology (0
n - 10, n • S. N • 15. * • 2. T » 23.18. T . 12,41, T • 35.14. T » 1270.21
S37.31 r * 155.25
,,„
SS8
537.31 155.25 \ 1270.21
0.10
t 10
SSW - (53.76 » 31.79)
MSB * 0.10/1 - 0.10
MSy ' 0.77/13 • 0.06
C °-l° , 67
f * _^^ » 1.6?
0.06
IS
537.31 155.25
*
MMMMMMMBW* MMBHBMM
10 5
« 0.77
ANQVA Table
Source
Be t ween (B)
WHMn(«)
Degrees of
fretdea
I
13
SS
0.10
0.77
MS
0,10
0.08
f
i.sr
The critical value of the F test at the O.QS significance level is 4.67, Since
the f value it 1es« then th* critical value, the *Mns am not ngntficantly
different (i.e.. they are Homogeneous).
Note: All calculations were rounded to two oecinal places. Results my differ
depending JDOO the number of decimal olues used in tech step of the calculations.
A-6
-------
l?90g
StMiH «tr toeing
[nflutnt Efflutnt
(^g/1) 1^/1)
1650.00
5200.00
5000.00
1720.00
1560. DO
10300-00
210.00
1600.00
204.00
160.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10-00
ID. 00
10.00
10.00
27.00
as. oo
10.00
ln(*f fluent)
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
3.30
4.44
2.30
8 i o loo iea 1_ t reattnunt
tln(tffliMnt)] Influtnt Ifflmnt 1n(«ff1uint)
t*i/1) (**g/l)
5.29
5.29
5.29
5.29
S.29
5.29
5.29
10.39
19.71
5.29
200,00
224.00
134.00
150.00
484.00
1S3.00
182.00
10.00
10.90
10.00
10.00
16. 25
10.30
10.00
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.79
2.30
2.30
tln(«fflutn
5.29
5.29
S-29
S.29
7.78
5,29
5.29
10
Mtan:
2760
Standard
3209.6
10
19.2
23.7
Variability Factor:
3.70
25.14
10
2.61
.71
72.92
16.59
39. S2
120. S
19.19
2.36
1.S3
2.37
.19
ANOVA Calculations:
SS8 «
!
SSU
MSB » SS8/(k-l]
'
A-7
-------
I790g
Example 2 (continued I
f m MSS/MSW
•here:
It • nunber of trtatmnt i*chnologi«j
n * ni«6«r of iata points for technology i
N * nuneer of data points for ill technologies
T. * sun of natural lag transformed data points far »ach technology
X., » the natural log transforms observations (j) for treatment technology |i)
N « 10, H • 7. N - 17. h « 2. T » 26.14, T • IS. Si, T - 42.73, T • 1825.35, T^ . 683.30,
T* - 275.23
tca fS83.30 275.23 ] 18ZS.8S „ ,_
SSI «l * __ • __ « 0.25
I 10 7 j 17
10 7
MSB • §.25/1 « 0,25
MSH « 4.79/15 • 0.32
F-ifL-0.71
0.32
AIWVA Table
of
Source freedoe SS
B«t»*ffl{l)
HHhtn(U)
1
IS
0.25
4.79
0.25
0.32
0.7S
Th« critical »alue of the F test at the 0.05 significance level is 4 54 Sine*
tht P value ii Ins than the critical »alue, the wans art net significantly
different (I.e., they art
Note: All calculations -*re roundtd to two dtciMl placet. Results My differ
depending upon the nueoer of decimal places used in each step af the calculations.
A-8
-------
Chlorob«ni«rn
Activated *
Influent
wn
7200.00
6500.00
6075.00
3040.00
ludae f 3 1 'owed
Iff luent
14/1)
80,30
70.00
35.00
10.00
bv carton adsorption
1n(«ffluentl [In(eff1uent]]2
4.3S 19, IS
4,25 la.OS
3.56 12.67
2.30 5 29
Sio'sateal
Influent
<4/n
9206.00
16646,00
43775-00
14731.00
3159.00
S75S.OO
3040.00
treatment
Effluent
(4/D
1083,00
709.50
460.00
14^,00
603.00
153.00
17.00
!n( effluent)
6.39
6.56
8.13
4.96
6.40
5.03
2.83
In[{eff1uent)]<
48.35
43 . 03
37. Si
Z* 50
10,36
IS- 30.
a. oi
Suffl:
Sue:
14.49
55.20
31.30
228.34
Nun:
5703
49
Standard Q«vi«tton:
183S.4 32.24
Variability Factor:
3.62
.95
14759
16311.86
7.00
452.5
379.04
15.79
5.56
1.42
ANOVA Calculations
SS8- I
AT'
ssu *
MSB * sse/u-u
M5U *
f *
A-9
-------
17909
Example 3 (continued)
where,
k • nutter of treatment technologies
n * nuBtoer of data pomes for technology i
N * nwMr of data points for all techno log its
T. * sun of natural log transformed data points for each technology
x . • the natyral 109 transformed observations (j) for treatment technology (i)
M . 4, M . 7. N • 11. k « 2. T » 14.43. T « 38,90, T « 53.3S, T2. Z85Q.49, TZ - 20S.S6
n •
T2
T •
2
ssa •
"•* n * ' , ™ ~ 4* § * *
1513.21
f 209. 96 1513.21
1 *
FT ~~T~
4. I "4"
) 2850.49
J""rr"
§.5Z
SSW - (55.20 * 22S.34) -
209'96
14.at
MSB - 9.S2/1 • 9.52
NSV * u.aa/s • i.65
f • 9.52/1-15 " S.7?
MOV* Table
Source
Bet«een(8)
WUhin(y)
Degrees of
freedom
1
9
ss m r
9.S3 §.S3 5.77
14.89 l.SS
The critical value of the F test at the 0.05 significance level <* 5.12, Since
the f value is larger than the critical value, the meant are significantly
different (i.e.. they are heterogeneous).
Note: All calculations «ere rounded to two decinal places. Remits aay differ depending
upon the nuefeer of decintl places used in each step of the calculations.
A-10
-------
A.2. Variability Factor
VF - Mtan"
where:
VF - estimate of daily maximum variability factor determined from
a sample population of daily data.
Cgg » Estimate of performance values for which 99 percent of the
daily observations will be below. Cgg is calculated using
the following equation: Cgg « Exp(y > 2.33 Sy) where y and
Sy are the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of the
logtransformed data.
Mean » average of the individual performance values.
EPA is establishing this figure as an instantaneous maximum because
the Agency believes that on a day-to-day basis the waste should meet the
applicable treatment standards. In addition, establishing this
requirement makes it easier to check compliance on a single day. The
99th percentile is appropriate because it accounts for almost all process
variability.
In several cases, all the results from analysis of the residuals from
BOAT treatment are found at concentrations less than the detection
limit. In such cases, all the actual concentration values are considered
unknown and hence, cannot bt used to estimate the variability factor of
the analytical results. Below is a description of EPA's approach for
calculating the variability factor for such cases with all concentrations
below the detection limit.
It has been postulated as a general rule that a lognormal
distribution adequately describes the variation among concentrations.
A-ll
-------
Agency data shows that the treatment residual concentrations are
distributed approximately lognortnally. Therefore, the lognormal model
has bitn ustd.routtntly in the EPA development of numerous regulations in
the Effluent Guidelines program and is being used in the BOAT program.
The variability factor (VF) was defined as the ratio of the 99th
percentile (C ) of the lognormal distribution to its arithmetic mean
(Mean).
VF - C99 (l)
Mean
The relationship between the parameters of the lognormal distribution
and the parameters of tht normal distribution created by taking the
natural logarithms of the I ognomtally -distributed concentrations can be
found in most mathematical statistics texts (see for example:
Distribution in Statistics-Volume 1 by Johnson and Kotz, 1970). The mean
of the lognormal distribution can be expressed in terms of the
mean U) and standard deviation (a) of the normal distribution as
f o 1 1 ows :
Cgg « Exp (M + 2-33o) (2)
Mean - Exp (M + .5a2) (3)
Substituting (2) and (3) in (1) the variability factor can then be
expressed in terms of a as follows:
VF - Exp (2.33 a • .5
-------
can be estimated using equation (I). For residuals with concentrations
that are below the detection limit, the above equations can be used in
conjunction with the assumptions below to develop a variability factor.
Step 1: The actual concentrations follow a lognormal distribution. The
upper limit (UL) is equal to the detection limit. The lower limit (Lt)
is assumed to be equal to one tenth of the detection limit. This
assumption is based on the fact that data from well-designed and
well-operated treatment systems generally falls within one order of
magnitude.
Step 2: The natural logarithms of th'e concentrations havt a normal
distribution with an upper limit equal to In (UL) and a lower limit equal
to In (U).
Step 3: The standard deviation (
-------
-------
APPENDIX 8
MAJOR CONSTITUENT CALCULATION FOR K016, K018» K019, KQ20, AND K030
B.I " K016
From Table 2-4t major constituents In KOI6 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppm) %
42. Tetrachloroethene 85,750 8.6 (=9)
110, Hexachloroben2ene 27,050 2,7 (=3)
111. Hexachlorobutadiene 59,250 5.9 (=6)
113, Hexachloroethane 30,000 3.0
Other BDAT constituents in K016 are:
, Average*
Concentration
(PPB) %
112. Hexaehlorocyclopentadiene 6,275 0.63 (=1)
Thus, the major constituents list for KOI6 is;
Constituent %
42. Tetrachoroethene 9
110. Hexachlorobenzene 3
111. Hexachlorobutadiene 6
113. Hexachloroethane 3
Other BDAT Constituents 1
Other Constituents 78
100%
•Average concentrations were calculated by averaging available data from all
sources. Where a concentration value was reported as less than a detection
limit, the detection limit was used in the calculation. Where concentrations
were reported as a range of values, the average over the range was used and
then averaged with other data.
B-1
-------
B.2 K018
From Table 2-5, major constituents in KOI8 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppa) %
12. Chloroethane 131,000 13.1 (=13)
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane 356,800 35.6 (=36)
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane 50,000 5.0 (=5)
46. 1,1,2-Triehloroethane 11,600 1.2 (si)
Other BDAT constituents in K018 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppm)
15. Chloronethane , 8,300
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3,325
110. Hexachlorobenzene 385
ill. Hexachlorobutadiene 386
113. Hexachloroethane 381
137. Pentachlorethane 528
13,305 ppm —> 1.3 (=1.0$)
Thus, the major constituent list for K018 is:
Constituent %
12. Chloroethane 13
22. 1,1-DiChloroethane 36
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane 5
46. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1
Other BDAT Constituents 1
Other Constituents 4U
100$
•Average concentrations were calculated by averaging available data from all
sources. Where a concentration value was reported as less than a detection
limit, the detection limit was used in the calculation. Where concentrations
were reported as a range of values, the average over the range was used and
then averaged with other data.
B-2
-------
The following major constituent list for K019 is from Reference
10: "Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology Perfor-
mance and Operation for Rollins Environmental Services (TX)
Inc., Deer Park, Texas".
Constituent %
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane 10
46. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane %
Other BOAT constituents 2
Other Constituents 82
Water 2
100$
B.4 K020
From Table 2-7, major constituents in K020 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppm) %
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane ** **
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane »» «»
42. Tetrachloroethene »« *«
46.' 1,1,2-Trichloroethane »» »*
Thus, the major constituent list for K02Q is:
Constituent I
23. 1,2-Diehloroethane »*
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane »*
46. 1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane •«
42. Tetrachloroethene *•
Other Constituents ^
100*
* Average concentrations were calculated by averaging available data from all
sources. Where a concentration value was reported as less than a detection
limit, the detection limit was used in the calculation. Where
concentrations were reported as a range of values, the average over the
range was used and then averaged with other data.
** This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business
Information. The Information is available in the confidential portion of
the Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
B-3
-------
B.5 K030
From Table 2-8, major constituents in KQ30 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppm)
42. Tetrachloroethene ** **
111. Hexachlorobutadiene ** **
137. Pentachloroethane ** **
Other BOAT Constituents in K030 are:
Average*
Concentration
(ppm)
87. o-Dichlorobenzene **
88. p-Dichlorobenzene **
112. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene **
113. Hexachloroethane **
115. Hexachloropropene **
136. Pentachlorobenzene **
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetraehlorobenzene *»
150. 1,2,4-Trichloroben2ene **
Thus, the major constituents list for K030 is:
Constituent %
42. Tetrachloroethene **
111. Hexachlorobutadiene **
137. Pentachloroethane **
Other BDAT Constituents **
Other Constituents *_*_
100$
"Average concentrations were calculated by averaging available data from all
sources. Mhere a concentration value was reported as less than a detection
limit, the detection limit was used in the calculation. Where
concentrations were reported as a range of values, the average over the
range was used and then averaged with other data.
**This information has been claimed as RCRA Confidential Business Information,
The information is available in the confidential portion of the
Administrative Record for this rulemaking.
B-U
-------
APPENDIX C
STRIP CHARTS FOR THE SAMPLING EPISODE AT PLANT A:
WASTE FEED RATES, KILN TEMPERATURES» AFTERBURNER
TEMPERATURES AND EXCESS OXYGEN CONCENTRATION
Figure C-1: RCRA Blend Feed Rates
Figure C-2: PCS Blend Feed Rate
Figure C-3: Kiln and Afterburner Temperatures
Figure C-U: Hot Duct Oxygen Concentration (%)
-------
-------
3:00 DO
1:00 pm
Scare of Sampling Episode
11:00 ant
3
T
200(lb/mia)
Figure C-l
RCBA BI^ND FEED RATES (Ib/min)
C-l
-------
11:00 on
End of Sampling Episode
9:00 pm
7:00 pn
5:00 pm
3
•3
01
ft
C/l
32
3
cn
n
Odb/min)
200(lb/mtn)(
Flgurt C-l
RCM BLEND FIEO RATES (Ib/mln)
(Concinuad)
C-2
-------
I—Sample Set 2'
Sample Set: 1 —t
160(lb/nln) §E
I
LJ
0(lb/min)
Start of Sampling Episode
Figure C-2
PCB BLEND FEED RATE (lb/min)
-------
-Sample S«t 6"
n
i
•— Sample Set 5-
-Sample Set
*—Sample Set 3-
I60(lb/tnin)
0(lb/a»lu)
End of Sampling Episode
Figure C-2
PCB BLEND FEED RATE (Ib/min)
(ConLinued)
-------
n
i
t-n
Afterburner Temperature Kiln Temperature |—Sample Set 2
Sample Set 1
3000(*F)
1000CF)
Start of Sampling Episode
Figure C-3
KILN AND AFTERBURNER TEMPERATURES (*F)
-------
o
i
ON
Afterburner Temperature Kiln Temperature
-Sample Set 6•• |
3000(°F)
1000<*F)
End of Sampling Episode
Figure C-3
KILN AND AFTERBURNER TEMPERATURES ("F)
(Continued)
-------
Oicygen
| Sample Set 2-
Sample Set 1
Start of Sampling Episode
Figure C-4
HOT DUCT OXYGEN CONCENTIATION (%)
-------
Oxygen
n
i
oo
.Sample Set 6-
Sample Set 5-
Sample Set 4
I Sample Set 3
End of Sampling Episode
Figure C-4
HOT DUCT OXYGEN CONCENTRATION (%)
(Continued)
-------
APPENDIX D
ANALYTICAL QA/QC
The analytical methods used for analysis of the regulated constitu-
ents identified in Section 5.0 are presented in this Appendix. SW-846 methods
(EPA's Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods,
S_W-8U6) are used in most cases for determining total constituent concentra-
tion.
In some instances it was necessary to deviate from the SW-846
methods. Deviations from SW-846 methods required to analyze the sample matrix
are listed in Table D-2. SW-846 allows for the use of alternative or equiva-
lent procedures or equipment; these are noted in Table D-3. These alterna-
tives or equivalents included alternative GC/MS operating conditions, equiva-
lent base/neutral surrogates, and different extraction techniques to reduce
sample matrix interferences.
The accuracy determination for a constituent is based on the matrix
spike recovery values. Tables D-4 and D-5 present the matrix spike recovery
data for volatile and semivolatile constituents in the kiln ash and scrubber
water residuals.
The accuracy correction factors for volatile and semivolatile
constituents detected in untreated K019 and in the kiln ash and scrubber water
residuals are summarized in Table D-6. The accuracy correction factors
were determined for each constituent by dividing 100 by the matrix spike
recovery (in percent) for that constituent.
0-1
-------
Table D-1
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR REGULATED CONSTITUENTS
Nonwastewater
Kt In Ash Residue
Total Constituent Concentration
a
Regulated Constituent
Volatila
9. Chiorobenzene
14. Chloroform
23. I,2-Dichloroethan*
42. Tetrachlaroathane
45. I,1.l-Tr1chloro«thana
SemivoI at Ile
68. B1s(2-chioro«thyl)ather
113. He»achloroethane
121. Naphthalene
141. Phenanthrene
150. 1.2,4-Trtchlorobenzene
Preparation
Method
Purge and
Trap
(Method
5030)
Sontcation
Extract ton*
(Method
3550)
Analytical Method
Gas Chronfiatagraphy/
Mass Spectrometry
for Volatile Organlcs
(Method 8240)
Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry
for SemlvolatHe
Organlcs: Capillary
Column Technique
(Method 8270)
Reference
Combustion Gas Scrubber Discharge Water
Total Constituent Concentration
Praparat tan
Mathod Analytical Metnod Reference
Purge and
Trap
(Method
5030)
Separatory
Funnel
Liquid-
Liquid
Extract Ion
(Method
3510)
Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spactrometry
for Volatile Organ)ci
(Method B240)
Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spue trorrm try
for SemivolatI la
Organlcs Cap!Ilary
Column Technique
(Method H07O)
Reference:
•Environmental Protection Agency. 1986, Tast Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition, U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, November 1986.
-------
Table D-1 (Continued)
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR REGULATED CONSTITUENTS
Wastewatar
Klin Ash Residua
Total Constituent Concent rat ion
Regulated Constituent
volatlle
7. Carbon Tatrachlorfd*
14. Chloroform
23. 1 ,2-D1Ch)oroethan«;
42. TetrachIoroethene
46. 1 , 1 ,2-TMch)oro«th»na
Semivolat4 la
Preparation
Mathod
Purge and
Trap
(Method
5030)
68. Bi«(2-ChloroethyIJether Sonlcatlon
80. p-DiChlorobanzenB Extraction*
110. He»«chIorobenzene (Method
113. HeKachloraethane 3550)
121. Naphtha I an*
136. PantachIorobenzene
148. 1,2,4,5-T«trachlorob«n*Bn«
150. 1 , 2.4-Trlchlorobenzene
AnaIy 11c a I Ma t hod
Gas Ctiromatography/
Mass Spactrometry
for Volatile Organlcs
(Mathod 8240)
Gas Chrotnatagraphy/
Mass Spactromatry
for Semivolat1le
Organlcs: Capillary
Column Technique
(Mathod 6270)
Reference
Combustion Gas Scrubber
Const 1tuent Concent rat 1 on
PreparatIon
Method
Purge and
Trap
(Method
5030)
Separatory
Funnel
Liquid-
Liquid
Extract Ion
(Method
analytical Method
Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spactrometry
for Volatile Organ Ics
(Method 8240)
Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry
for Semivolat1 IB
Organlcs Capillary
Column Technique
(Method 8070)
3510)
Reference
Reference:
•Environmental Protection Agency, 1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition, U.S. EPA. Off leu of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, November 1986.
-------
fable D-2 Deviations from Ssi-tJ4t>
Analysis
Method
SW-B46 Specification
Deviation from Sy-846 Method
Rationale for Deviation
Continuous liquid/
Liquid Extraction or
Sonh1et Extraction or
Separator? Funnel
I i quid/ I iquid
Extraction or Sonication
3VO
3540
3S10
Add 1.0 nl of solution containing 100
ug/mV of the acid surrogates and 200
ug/nl of the base/neutral surrogates
Additional amounts of the surrogates
if .high concentration samples are
expected
0,1 ml of a solution LOIIIOmiriy 1,000
yg/ml of the and surrogates and 2,000
ug/ml of the base/neutral surrogates
vere added to the samples I he final
concentration of the surrogates in the
extracts is the same as specified in
SM S4b
Continuous Liquid/
liquid Extraction
Use 4 micro Snyder column to Adjust
the concent rule *olu
-------
Table D-2 (Cont.)
Analysis
Method
SU 646 Specification
Deviation from SU-846 Method
Rationale for Deviation
6as Chronutography/
Hdss Spectrometry fur
Sefflivolat lie Organic*;
Capi llary Column
Technique
ui
Separatory Funnel
L iquid/l iquid
E»traction
6270 the internal standards reconmended are
I,4-dichlurobenzene-d.,
naptha)ene~d<., acenaphthene-d.-.
phenantrirene-djQ. chrysene-d,,,
ind perylene-d.n Other compounds
•ay be used as internal standards as
long as the requirements given in
Paragraph 1,3.2 of the «elhod are
•et. Each compound is dissolved mth
a small volune of carbon dt&ulfide and
diluted to volume with rnethylene
chloride so ttet the final solvent is
approximately 2OX carbon dtsulfide.
Hast of the campunds are also soluble
in snail volunes of nethanol, acetone,
or toluene, except for
perylene-d,,. Ihe resulting
solution Kill contain each standard at
a concentration of 4.(MO ng/ul, Each
I raL iample extrcct undergoing
analysis should be spiked with 10 id.
of the internal standard solution,
resulting in * concentration of 40
ng/uL of each internal standard.
3510 Extract sample at high pH and then at.
lew pH.
The preparation of the internal
standards uas changed to eliminate
carbon disuHide as. a solvent The
internal standard concentration was
changed to SO ng/ul instead of 40
ng/ul. The standards were dissolved
in melhylene chloride only.
Perylene-d., dissolved in tnethylene
chloride sufficiently to yield
reliable results.
The combust ion gas eff luent water
residue is extracted at low pH first
and then at high pH.
Sulf
9030 Ho sample preparation given in Method
9030 for solid Baste matrix.
Sample preparation required due to
matrix of samples. Distillation of
sulfide from the acid solution was
used with the sorpnon of H.S in
NaOH. this method is described in
EPA's "lest Method to Otter mint
Hydrogen Sulfide Released from
Distillation procedure used to
liberate sulfide from various
mat rices and to reduce potential
interferences. SU-B46 Method
9030 is applicable only for water
samples (drinking, surface, and
saline wastes), therefore sample
preparation required for other
uidtr ices.
-------
Table D—3 W*<"'f >t Procedure:, or Iquipmenl Uutd in [ulraction ol Organic torajjoutiiH Uhui
Alitinot ives or Equivalents art: Allowed in the Sy-b4t Methods
Ali
Hethod
Sample Al iquot
AUtnial ives or fquiva lents Allowed
by SU-646 Methods
Piocedurei or
Used
Purge and I rap
5030 *j mill liters of liquid
Or 2 grants ol so 1 id
The purge and trap device to be
uLed is specified in the method in
f igure 1. the desorber to tie used
i', described in Figures 2 and 3,
and the packing materials are
described in Section 4 10.2. (he
method a I loo equivalents of this
equipment or materials to be used
The purge and trap equipment, the
desorbti, and tnt packing materials
used wL-it: ai &p«cil ied in SW-A46.
Iht method ipecif lei that the
trap must be at least 25 cm long
and have an inside diameter of «t
least 0 IDS in
The length ol Ihe trap was *iU cm
and the diameter uas 0 ?'" cm
Ihe surrogates retonmended are
to luene-dfl, <- bi omof luorobeniene,
and 1.2-dichloroeth4ne-d4. Ihe
recunnended concentration level is
0 25 ug/ml.
All i surrogates were added at Ihe
concentration leconmended in SV i*4€
Continuous liquid-
Liquid Ixtraction
3SZO
I liter of liquid
Acid and base/neutral extracts
are usually combined before
analysis by GC/MS Honever,
under some situations, they may
be extracted and analyzed
separately.
Acid and base/neutral extracts
Mere combined mth the e«Lrf>i ion of
the sample collected from ihe
filtration de»atti ing ol OAF float
mixture
-------
Table D-3 (Coot.)
Sy-fl4t Method
Sample AI iguot
Alternatives or tquivalents Allowed
by &y-B4C Methods
Specific Procedures or
tquipmer.l Uied
Cent inuciub 1 iq>i id
I iquid Infract ion
(tout inuuiJj
O
Ihe base/neutral su
recamnended die 2 ( luarabiphenyI.
nitroben^ene-d'j, terphenyl-dl4
Ihe dcid surrogates recomnended
dre ?-f luoropnenol,
i".4.t Iribromophcfiol, and
phenoI d6 Additional compounds
ma/ be used (or burroyates The
recunmended concentrations for
iow-ined>um concent rat ion lew I
&<«nple& are 100 ug/ml for acid
iuirogdtei and 200 uy/ml for
base/neulrat surrogates Volume
of suiiog
-------
Table D-3 (Cemt.)
Analysis
SU-M6 Preparat ion
•felted Netted
Alternatives or Equivalents
Allowed in Sy H46 lor
or in Procedure
Specif u (quiptwnt ui
Used
D
OS
Gas Chroma I ogt aptly/
Kii& ipeclro»elry
lor voUl tie
or games
8NO S030
• fieto«ended GC/MS ope tat 1119 conditions
I lee Iron energy:
Mass range:
Scan I i«e
Initial coluBi tnperature:
Initial colum holding line.
Coluan leaperature pnxjr*«
F i(i*1 coliMO tcapcrature.
Final coli«n holding time:
Injector Inpcrature;
Source leaperaiure:
transfer line t
Carrier g«s
ralure:
70 «ols Inoninal)
IS 260 «nu
lo give b scans/beak but
not lo e*ceed I sec/itan
4V C
H1"
8'C/ain
200-C
IS am
200-22S*C *
According lo Manufacturer's
specif teal ion
Z5B JOO'C
Hydrogen al SO cm/set or
heliu* at 3D cat/sec
* Actual (.(.'M'. untiuliiH) lundu ion-
I lect ran eneiqy
Scan Iime
/O ev
IS i
? SL-L/
Initial (.olumi Ini^ti (/mm
final column leu^teidtun1 NO I
I indl column hoItlHIM I inie <*0 mm
Injeclor temper atur* ??0 l
Source temperature. ?'y.,lriii (I'.til
(Quipiienl I uinegan Hal auilel MOd U.Hs/U^ sy
Data iyste.ii "iUffB IHCOb"
Node- flee iron inpat I
Interlace to MS Jet
* I he coltfm should be 6 It x 0 1 in I 0 gla&s. packed
• ilh ft SP-IOOO on CarloDack 0 (60/80 Msti| 01 an
equivalent,
Samples My be analysed be purge and trap technique or by
direct injection
* In? column used MAS a i,i|jilldiy VU01 which it,
60 Meters luny ami has jn mnrr didweiei u( U /
(ui> and * t ',> i.iiKJ
* All i
trap
wi're diidl»/td bi ing Itu- puiuc dntl
-------
Table D-3 (Cont.)
Analysis
Sample
Sy-84t Preparation
Method Method
A Iterii.iL ives or I qu i HA lent •>
Allowed in SW 846 lor
Iqulament or in Procedure
Specific Equipment or t'
Used
ChroflialographyV
3520-Liquids
3540-So I ids
for seffli^ulat i )«
OrganiCS: capillary
column technique
Reconmemled (X/HS operating conditions
Ho is range:
Scan time;
Initial column tefnpererature:
Source temperature:
Injector:
Sajople volume:
Carrier gas:
J'^-'jOU amu
1 sec/icsn
40'C,
4 mm
40 270'C at
lire/mm
2JQ'i. (until
htnzojq.h. i, jpery lene ha:.
t luted)
?50-3QQ'C
250-300"C
According to
manufacturer'&
specificalion
Grcb-Lype, split less
1-2 yl
Hydrogen at SO cm/sec. or
helium at 30 cm/sec
* Acluol dt/HS ufjeidliruj tunUili
Mass ran^fc
Scan I line:
IniLial column temperature
Initial column holding time
Column temperature program
F inal column temperature hold
Injecloi lemptralure.
transfer line temperature
Source temperature
Injector.
Sample volume
Carrier gas:
JS - 460 drau
0 6 tec/scan
3*>'C
i S mm
3b"C at lO*C/min
Cool on column dl
1 uL of idmfil
Hydioqtn P bO ml/min
Ihe column should bb JO m by 0 ?S mm I D . 1-um f i hn
thickness si I icon-coaled fused silica capillary column
(JK.W Scientific DB-5 or equivalent)
• Additional Informal ion on Actual System Used.
fquipmtnt Hfcnelelt Packard S9b/A GC/HS
(C^jeraloib Manual Revision B)
Soflirart: Package: AQUARIUS NiJS library
dwdl Idblt
(he column used Mas the J&U scientific Oft 'j
silica (.tjpillaiy column It is 60 nieltr^ with d
0 3^ mil capil lory column inner diameter and a I 0
um f i Ini
-------
Table D-4
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR KILN ftSH RESIDUE
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
Original Amount Amount Percent* Amount Amount Percent*
Amount Found Spiked Recovered Recovery Spiked Recovered Recovery
Spike Constituent (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) ippk) (pgb) %
VOLATILES
4. Benzene <2 25 22.6 90 25 21.2 85
7. Carbon Tetra0hloride *"
9. Chlorobenzene <2 25 24.8 99 25 25 100
11. Chloroform *»
22, 1,1-Diehloroethane »»
a
£ 23. 1,2-Dlohloroethane **
24. 1,1-Diehloroethylene <2 25 21.2 85 25 19-4 78
42. Tetrachloroethene **
43. Toluene »•
45. 1,1f1-Tr ichloroethane «*
•Percent recovery = 100 x (C^ - C0)/Ct» where Ci = amount recovered, Co = original amount found, and
GI = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery for this constituent is based on
the lower average percent recovery of the volatile constituents. The lower average percent recovery is
94$ from the duplicate sample result.
-------
Table D-4 (Continued)
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR KILN ASH RESIDUE
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
Original Amount Amount Percent* Amount Amount Percent*
Amount Found Spiked Recovered Recovery Spiked Recovered Recovery
Spike Constituent (ppb) (ppb) (p[ft>^ (1) (ppb) (f>pb) %
VOLATILES (Continued)
47. Trichloroethene <2 25 26.8 107 25 28 112
AVERAGE RECOVERY FOR VOLATILES 95 94
SEMIVOLATILES (BASE/NEUTRAL FRACTION?
52. Acenaphthene <2 50 55 110 50 55 110
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether +
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl) +
phthalate
88. 1,14-Dichlorobenzene <2 50 »*5 90 50 H9-5 99
98. Di-n-butylphthalate +
102. 2,1-Dinitrotoluene <50 50 53-5 107 50 55 110
105. N-Nitroso-di-n-
propylamine <5 50 60 120 50 65 130
•Percent recovery = 100 x (Cj - C0)/Ct, where Cj = amount recovered, Co = original amount found, and
Ct = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery for this constituent is based on
the lower average percent recovery of the volatile constituents. The lower average percent recovery is
91$ from the duplicate sample result,
+No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent Vecovery for this constituent is based
on the lower average percent recovery of the semivolatile (base/neutral) constituents. The lower
average percent recovery is 103^ from the duplicate sample result.
-------
Table D-4 (Continued)
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR KILN ASH RESIDUE
Sample Result Pup 1 i ca te Sample Re suIt
Original Amount Amount Percent* Amount Amount Percent*
Amount Found Spiked Recovered Recovery Spiked Recovered Recovery
Spike Constituent (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) (ppb) (ppb) %
SEMIVOLATILES (Continued)
109. Fluorene -»•
110. Hexachlorobenzene +
113. Hexachloroethane +
121. Naphthalene +
136. Pentachlorobenzene +
a
£ 141. Phenanthrene +•
145. Pyrene <2 50 60 120 50 46 92
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro- +
benzene
150. 1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene <5 50 37.5 75 50 40 80
AVERAGE RECOVER* FOR 104 103
SEMIVOLATILES (BASE/NEUTRAL)
"Percent recovery = 100 x (Cj - Co)/Ct, where Cj = amount recovered, C0 = original amount found, and
Cj, = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery for this constituent is based on
the lower average percent recovery of the volatile constituenta. The lower average percent recovery is
94$ from the duplicate sample result.
'l
+No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery for this constituent is based
on the lower average percent recovery of the semivolatile (base/neutral) constituents. The lower
average percent recovery is 103? from the duplicate sample result.
-------
Table D-5
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER DISCHARGE WATER
__ Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
Original Amount Amount Percent* Amount Amount Percent*
Amount Found Spiked Recovered Recovery Spiked Recovered Recovery
Spike Constituent (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) (ppb) (ppb) %
VOLATILES
4. Benzene <2 25 21 84 25 17 68
7. Carbon Tetrachloride **
9. Chlorobenzene <2 25 29 116 25 23 92
14, Chloroform **
21. Dichlorodifluoromethane **
V 22. 1,1-Dichloroethane «••
i— '
u>
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane «»
21. 1,1-Dichloroethylene <2 25 12 48 25 11 44
42. Tetraehloroethene **
43. Toluene »*
•Percent recovery = 100 x (Cj - Co)/Ct, where Cj = amount recovered, C0 = original amount found, and
Cfc = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the volatile
constituents. The lower average percent recovery is lB% from the duplicate sample result.
+No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the semivolatile
(base/neutral) constituents. The lower average percent recovery is 84? from both sample results.
-------
a
i
Table D-5 (Continued)
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER DISCHARGE WATER
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
Original
Amount Found
Spike Constituent (ppb^
VOLATILES (Continued)
^5. 1,1,1-Triehloroe thane **
47. Triehloroethene <2
AVERAGE PERCENT RECOVERY FOR VOLATILE
SEMIVOLATILES (Base/Neutral Fraction)
52. ftcenaphthene <5
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether +
88. 1,4-Wehlorobenzene <2
98. Di-n-butylphthalate +
102. 2,4-Dlnitrotoluene <2
105. N-Nitroso-dl-n- <5
Amount
Spiked
(ppb)
25
50
50
50
50
Amount
Recovered
(ppb)
21
51
34
43
50
Percent*
Recovery
(*)
84
83
102
68
86
100
Amount
Spiked
(ppb)
25
50
50
50
50
Amount
Recovered
(ppb)
27
51
35
42
46
Percent*
Recovery
I
108
78
102
70
84
92
propylamine
"Percent recovery = 100 x (Cj - C0)/Ctt where C| = amount recovered, C0 = original amount found, and
Ct = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the volatile
constituents. The lower average percent recovery is JB% from the duplicate sample result.
+No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the semivolatile
(base/neutral) constituents. The lower average percent recovery is 84? from both sample results.
can-?.*;
-------
Table D-5 (Continued)
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOB COMBUSTION GAS SCRUBBER DISCHARGE WATER
Sample Result Duplicate Sample Result
Original Amount Amount Percent* Amount Amount Percent*
Amount Found Spiked Recovered Recovery Spiked Recovered Recovery
Spike Constituent (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) ($) (ppb) (ppb) |
SEMIVQLATILES (Continued)
109. Fluorene +
110. Hexachlorobenzene +
113. Hexachloroethane +
121. Naphthalene +
136. Pentachlorobenzene +
o
(1 141. Phenanthrene •*•
Ul
145. Pyrene <2 50 43 86 50 43 86
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetraehloro- «•
benaene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <10 50 30 60 50 34 68
AVERAGE PERCENT RECOVERY FOR 84 84
SEMIVOLATILES (BASE/NEUTRALS)
*Percent recovery = 100 x (Cj - Co)/Ct, where C| = amount recovered, Co = original amount found, and
Ct = amount spiked.
**No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the volatile
constituents. The lower average percent recovery is 78$ from the duplicate sample result.
+No matrix spike was performed for this constituent. The percent recovery determined for this constituent
to be considered for the final rule is based on the lower average percent recovery of the semivolatile
(base/neutral) constituents. The lower average percent recovery is 84$ from both sample results.
_a A
-------
Table D-6
SUMMARY OF ACCURACY CORRECTION FACTORS
Accuracy Correction Factor*
Kiln Ash Residue Scrubber Water
Constituent To tal Compos it ion Total Composition
7, Carbon tetrachloride 1.06 1.28
9- Chlorobenzene 1.01 1.09
14. Chloroform 1.06 1,28
21. Dichlorodifluoromethane — 1.28
22. 1,1-Diehloroethane 1.06 1.28
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.06 1.28
42. Tetrachloroethene 1.06 1.28
43. Toluene — 1.28
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.06 1.28
47. Trichloroethene 0.93 1.19
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl}ether 0.97 1.19
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.97
88. p-Diehlorobenzene 1.11 1.47
98. Di-n-butylphthalate 0.97 1.19
109. Fluorene 0.97 1.19
110. Hexachlorobenzene 0.97 1.19
113. Hexachloroethane 0.97 1.19
121. Naphthalene 0.97 1.19
136. Pentachlorobenzene 0.97 1.19
141. Phenanthrene 0,97 1.19
148. 1,2,1,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.97 1.10
150. 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene 1.33 1.67
*The Accuracy Corrrection factor is equal to 1 divided by the Percent
Recovery Correction Factor.
D-16
-------
o
I
Table D-7
Ctlculatlon of BOAT Tr««t»«nt Stand*rd«
Vast* Codti K01B
(Scrubber »»t»r CmposUlon)
Thli tabl* pr*Mnti th« oaloulvtloni of th« corracted analytical valuaa for canatttuanta ahlch «ar»
dhtactad In tha untraatad or tit* treated aaatai ualnp the acouracf oorrectlon rectore*(ACF|. Kote that
•hen • conetttuent la not da tact ad In the aah thai unadjusted analytical valua la eat aqual to tha
Reaction Italt, Ih* unadjuatad analytical valuai and di tact Ion llalta are Labeled "a* and "dl",
raapaottvely.
Saaple Sat
7.
9.
14
ei
BB
Camtf tuant
Carbon tatrachlorlda
unadjueted value (•ft' 1 1
• ar d|
ACT
adjueted value (•o^l)**
Chlorotenrane
unadjueted value (ao/l)
• or dt
ACF
adjuetad value l«a/l)**
.Chlorororai
unedjueted value (a«/l)
• or dl
ACf
a dj uated valiai lag/l)**
.01 ohlarodiriuoraa* thane
unadJuBted value lagA)
• ar ill
ACF
adjuetad value (•u/l)"*
.1 ,1 -0 1 ohl ore* th«n«
unadjuctad valua (BB^!)
• or dl
ACf
•dju*t*d valiM (•a/'ll**
1
o.ooc
dl
i.eee
0.003
a.aos
dl
1.087
O.OO8
o.ooe
dl
i.aae
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.882
0.003
0.008
dl
i.?ae
0.003
e
o.ooe
dl
i.eee
0.003
o.ooc
dl
1.0B7
0,008
o.ooe
dl
1.288
0.003
0.002
dl
1.888
0.003
0.002
dl
i.aae
0.003
a
o.ooe
di
1.BBB
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.00
o.ooe
O.OOB
dl
1.BBB
0.003
0.004
•
i.eee
O.OOB
0.002
dl
1.2B2
O.OO3
4
o.ooe
dl
i.eae
0.003
o.ooe
A
1.0V
o.ooe
0.002
dl
1.8K
0.003
0.014
•
i.eee
0.018
o.ooc
dl
1.E8C
0.003
B
o.ooe
dt
i.eee
0.003
.0.002
dl
1.08?
0.002
o.ooe
dl
i.eee
0.003
0.008
dl
i.aae
0.003
o.ooa
« ,
1.882
0.003
6
o.ooe
dl
1.298
O.D03
o.ooe
dl
1.0B7
0.008
o.ooe
dl
i.eee
0.003
0.002
dl
i.eae
0.003
0.008
dl
1.28C
0.003
* Accuracy Cor met (on Factore ara prosontad in Tabla D-6.
** Adjusted value = (Unadjyitad yalua) • (ACF)
-------
Table D-7 (Continued)
Calculation or BOAT Trut»nt at*ndards
•••t* Codii M)1fl
(Bcrublwr W«Ur Coapovltton)
ThU lutilt prwHnt* th« (MloulBtltn* of th« onrraotcd •ralytloal v«lu«« for conitltuant* «h1ch *ar«
ditBGUd In Uia untr««t«d or thi treated •«•<•, using HM moourmcy oorrcotlon f«otor«*(ACFl. Hot* that
•fi«n m oonititiant tm nut, diUotad In tha aah tha unadjuitad analytical valua la aat aqiMl to the
dttaotlon Italt. Tha unadjiutad aaalytloal «alua> and ditaotlon llalta ara I aba Lad "a" and *«•,
raapaotlvaly.
Saapla Sat
B3
4C
43
46
47
Conatlluant
.1 ,2-01 chl oroa Uiana
unadjuatad valua I an/I I
• or dl
MY
adjuatad vali» lag/U**
.Tatraahloraathana
unadjuatad valua (BO/I)
• or dl
ACF
Bdjuaud valua iBB/ll"
.Toluana
unadjuatad valua (floA)
• or dl
ACT
adjuatad valua (MB/ I)**
.1 .1 ,1-THahlanMSiMM
unadjuatad valua (•fr'U
* or dl
ACF
adjuatad valua J«t/U**
.Trlchloraathana
uiwdJiMtvd »•!•• (m/l)
• or dl
ACF
•djuitid vilui (ng/l)»«
1
O.OOB
dl
1.BBE
0.003
a.ooc
dl
i.eae
0.003
0.002
dl
1.P8B
0.003
o.ooe
A
1.B8B
O.O03
o.ooe
dl
1.190
0.008
e
a.ooc
di
1.BB6
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.BBB
0.003
0.003
•
i.eae
0.004
o.ooe
dl
1.8BB
0.003
0.008
dl
1.190
0.008
3
o.ooe
dl
i.eee
0.003
-
O.OOB
dl
i.eae
0.003
0.003
•
1.6BB
0.003
O.OOB
dl
1.8 BE
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.190
0.002
4
o.ooe
di
i.eae
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.288
0.003
O.OOB
•
i.eae
O.OOB
o.ooe
dl
1.EBS
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
• B
o.ooe
dl
1.P8B
O.OO3
*
o.ooe
dl
i.eae
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.C8B
0.003
o.oos
dl
1.2BE
0.003
o.ooe
dl i
1.100
o.ooe
•
o.ooe
dl
1.BBB
0.003
o.ooe
dl
i.eae
0.003
o.ooe
dl
i.eae
0.003
o.ooe
dl
i.ese
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.100
0.008
* Accuracy Corraetlon Factor* *ra praiantad In Tibia D-6,
** Adluatad valua = I Unadjusted *«lua| I (ACF|
-------
Table D-7 (Continued)
Calculation of BOAT Traetaant Standard*
Maat* CodBi K01B
(Scrubfaar Vatar GoBpotltlon)
This tabla praeenta Mia caloutatlona of the oorreatad analytical value a for canetltuanta •hlch *ara
dacaolad in tha untreated or the traeted «****, using Hi» accuracy oarractton ractore*(ACF). Note that
•ha* • conatltuvnt 1* not dataotad In tha aah tha unadjuated analytical valua Is aat aqual to tha
ihtactlon Itajlt. Tha unadjuatad analytical valua* Mid ihteotlon luit* ara Labalad 'a' and 'dl',
reapaotlvaly.
Ba»pl» Sat
MD
88.
88.
88.
109
110
Canatl tuant
Bla(C-ohloroatli|r 1 lathar
unadjuatad valua (BO/I)
a or dl
ACT
adjuctad y.i in Iae/1 1**
p-Ol ohloroba nxana
unadjuatad valua lag/1)
• or dl
Uf
adjuatad valua (ao/U**
Dt-n-Uityl phthalata
unadjuatad valua (a|t/l)
• or dl
ACF
adjuctad valua (mo/ 1}**
.Fluorana
unadjuatad valua (a<|/l|
a or dl
ACf
adjuatad valua (aoA)**
.Hawchlorofaanvna
uiHdJuatad valua (BO/ I)
• or dl
ACF
adjuatad vaiua (•o/l|"<
1
o.ooe
dl
1.1BO
O.OOB
O.OOB
dl
1.471
a.ooa
0.001
dl
1.180
0.008
0.002
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.010
dt
1.190
o.oie
ft
0.008
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.008
dl
1.471
0.009
0.008
a
1.180
0.008
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
a
o.ooc
dl
1.180
o.ooe
O.OOE
dl
1.471
0.003
0.008
•
1,180
O.OOD
0.008
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.010
dl
1.190
0.018
4
o.ooe
di
1.180
O.OOC
o.ooe
dl
1.471
0.003
0.004
•
1.180
0.005
o.ooe
dl
1.1BO
o.ooe
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
s
0.008
*
1.180
0.002
*
o.ooe
dl
1.471
0.003
0.003
•
1.180
0.003
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.010
dl '
1.180
o.me
8
o.ooe
dl
1.180
O.OOE
O.ODE
dl
1.471
0.003
0.003
a
1.180
0.003
O.OOE
dl
1.180
O.OOE
0.010
dl
1.180
0.01?
• Accuracy Correction Fectora ara presented In Table 0-6.
** Ll\\i,mtm* u_l._ = I lln.Hl..i.t>H u»li_l * (4TF1
-------
Table D-7 (Continued)
Calculation of BOAT Trutaint
•••tl Co* i KOI B
(Scrubter W«t*r
Th1« ttoti priMnti thB a*Loui*t|on> of th» CDrnctMl •rwlytlul nluas far conitlttMnt* «hlch MIT*
dsUctBd In Orn untr««t«d or ttw tract *d Mit«, wing Ui« Mouricy oarrtatton factors*! ACF). Mot* Mutt
•inn • oanitltiwnt !• not d*tM)t«d In th« Mk Ui* uM4Juit*d •(•lvtloal vilu* !• Mt aqMi to the
d»t«ctlon Unit. Tit* t>MdJu*t«d ••alytloal vMutt and dit«otlan UBU> •(•• Lib«l«d •«• Mid "dl",
8«t
a
o
113.
lil.
138.
141.
148.
Conltt ttan t
unadjtwtsd vtliw IBQ/L)
• or dl
ACF
adjusted vatua IBJO/I|**
Naphth.t.n.
unadjuatad iralua (ae/t)
• or dl
ACF
•djUBtad valua l«B/l)**
fentaahl orate IUBM
IIMdJUatBd ••III* (•«/!)
• or dl
ACF
•djuatBd valua IBO/I)**
Ph.nar.tt.ran.
unadjuatad vBlu* IBB/I]
• or dl
ACF
.IJu.t.d «.lu» t«^U«
1 ,B,4»B-T«tr.ohl0r0teMii.
unadJUBtBd *B!UB Ino/l)
* or dl
ACF
•djuatBd valua (BQ/I)**
1
0.010
dt
1.180
0.01B
o.ooe
dl
1.180
0.008
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.006
dl
1.190
0.008
1
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
0.008
dl
1.180
0.008
0.010
dl
1.180
O.MB
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
O.OOS
dl
1.180
0.008
a
0.010
dl
1.180
O.OIE
0.008
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
O.OOE
dl
1.180
0.008
0.006
dl
1.180
O.OOB
4
0.010
dl
1.180
O.OIE
o.ooe
dl
1.180
0.008
0.010
dl
1.180
0.018
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
0.006
dl
1.180
0.008
B
0.010
dl
1.180
O.OIE
,
0.008
dl
1.100
o.ooe
0.010
dl
1.180
0.018
0.008
dl
1.180
0.008
O.QQG
dl 1
1.180
0.008
a
0.010
dl
1.180
0.018
o.ooe
dl
1.180
O.OOE
0.010
dl
1.180
o.oie
o.ooe
dl
1.180
o.ooe
o.ooe
dl
1.180
0.006
Accuracy Correction Factors tr« pr«B*nt«
-------
Table D-? (Continued)
Calculation of BOAT TrMtavnt
«su* Dadit K018
(8crubl»r lUUr GoBpocitlonl
Thla tabla prawnta th« calculation* of th« aorraotvd analytical valuta fur constituents »Mch
dtt*ct*d fn !*• untrour»cy cnrmotlon f«otar»»(ACF). Net* that
•Dan • coMtltMiit '• not d»t«t»d tn tit* Mb th* yM4|uat*d •Mlyttcal «•!«§ U Mt «q«wl to the
dictation Itatt. Th* UMdJutt«d •n«t.ytlo*l «•!>•• «nd dnt«ct
-------
Table D-8
Calculation of BOAT Treatment Standards
Waste Coda: K019
(Rotary Kiln Incinerator Ash Composition]
This table presents the calculations of the corrected analytical values for the regulated
constituents using the acurracy correction Factors*! ACF] . Note that when a constituent la not
detected In the eeh tha unadjusted analytical value ia Bet equal to the detection limit.
The unadjusted analytical values
7.
Coned tuent
Carbon tetrechlorlde
unadjusted velua J mg/kg]
m or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mo/kg)**
and detection
1
8.000
dl
1.064
2.128
limits
E
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
are labeled "a"
Sample Set
3
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
and "dl",
4
2.000
dl
1.084
2.12B
respectively.
5
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
e
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
9.Chlorobenzene
14
22
23
unadjusted veluo (tog/kg)
• or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mo/kg)**
.Chloroform
unadjusted value 1 mg/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mg/kg)**
.1 ,1-Olchloroe thane
unadjusted value (mo/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (ng/kgj**
.1 ,2-tH chloroe thane
unadjusted value [rng/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mg/kgj**
2.000
dl
1.010
2.020
8.000
dl
1.0B4
2.128
2.000
dl
1.0B4
2.1 SB
2.000
dl
1.064
2.12B
8.000
dl
1.010
2.020
2.000
dl
1.084
2.12B
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.DB4
2.1SB
2.000
dl
1.010
2.020
2. 000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.084
E.12B
2.000
dl
1.010
2.020
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.084
2.12B
2.000
dl
1.010
2.020
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.0B4
2.12B
2.0DO
dl
1.0B4
2.128
2.000
dl
1.010
2.020
2.000
dl
1.064
2.12B
2.000
dl
1.064
2.12B
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
* Accuracy Correction Factors ere presented In the Background Document.
** Adjusted value = (Unadjusted value) x (ACF)
-------
Table D-8(Continued)
Calculation of BOAT Treatment Standards (Continued)
Waste Code: K019
(Rotary Kiln Incinerator Aah Composition)
This table presents the calculations of the corrected analytical values far the regulated
constituents using the acurracy correction factore*{ ACF) . Note that when a constituent IB not
detected In the ash the unadjusted analytical value IB eet equal to the detection limit.
The unadjusted analytical values and detection Units era Labeled a and dl, respectively.
42.
45.
47.
68.
70.
Constituent (Cent.)
To t rach I o roe thane
unadjusted value (no/kg]
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mg/kg]**
1 (1 ,1-Trlchlorosthana
unadjusted value (mg/kg]
a or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (no/kg)**
Tr 1 ch I o roe the na
unadjusted value (mg/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (mg/kg)**
Bis(2-cnlaroethyljether
unadjusted value I mg/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mg/kg)**
B1a(2-ethylhexyl)phthalata
unadjusted value [mg/kg]
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value lmg/kg)**
1
2.000
dl
1.QB4
2.128
2.000
dl
1.084
B.128
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
a. ooo
2.000
dl
1.000
2. ODD
e
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2. 000
Sample Sat
a
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
2.000
dl
1.064
2.12B
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
4
2.000
dl
1.0B4
2.128
2. ODD
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
12.000
B
1.000
12.000
6
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
2.000
dl
1.084
2.128
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000 -
dl
1.000
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
8.000
6
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.064
2.128
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2. ODD
dl
1.DOO
2.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
* Accuracy Correction Factors are presented In the Background Document.
-------
Table D-8(Continued)
Calculation of BOAT Treatment Standards [Continued]
Waste Code: KD18
(Rotary Kiln Incinerator Ash Composition]
a
i
KJ
This tabls presents Che calculatfons of the corrected analytical valuaa for tha regulated
constituents using tha acurracy correction factors*! ACF) . Note that when a constituent IB not
detected In tha aah tha unadjusted analytical value is set aqual to tha detection limit.
The unadjusted analytical values and detection limits are labeled a and dl, respectively.
88.
SB.
110
113
181
Constituent (Cont.J
p-Of chlorobanzana
unadjusted value (no/kg]
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (no/kg)**
Dl-n-butyl phthelata
unadjusted value (mo/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (no/kg)**
. Hexachlorobenzane
unadjusted value (no/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (mo/kg)**
.Hexachloroethane
unadjuated valua (mp/kg)
• or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (mg/kg)**
.Naphthalene
unadjuated value (mg/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value fmg/kgj**
1
e.DDO
dl
1.111
2.828
8.000
dl
1.000
2.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
2
2.000
dl
1.111
8.288
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
Sample Set
3
2.000
dl
1.111
8.882
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2,000
dl
1.000
2.000
4
8.000
dl
1.111
8.888
230.000
a
1.000
230.000
10.000
dt
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
8.000
dl
1.000
8.000
6
8.000
dl
1.111
2.222
2. 000
dl
1.000
8.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.0DO
10.000
2.000
dl
1.00Q
2.000
B
2.000
dl
1.111
2.222
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
* Accuracy Correction Factors are presented in tha Background Document.
** Adjusted value <= (Unadjusted valuel x (AHFl
-------
Table D-8(Continued)
Calculation of BOAT Treatment Standards (Continued)
Waste Code: K.019
[Rotary Kiln Incinerator Aah Composition)
o
10
This teble presents the calculations of the corrected analytical values Tor the regulated
constituents using the acurracy correction fectorsMACF) . Note that whan a constituent ID not
detected In the aeh the unadjusted analytical value la eat equal to the detection limit.
The unadjusted analytical values and detection Limits ere labeled a and dl, respectively.
136
141
148
ISO
Constituent (Cont.)
.Penteohlorobanzene
unadjusted value (ng/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value Ing/kg)**
.Phenanthrane
unadjusted valua (m§/kg)
• or dl
ACF
adjusted valua (mg/kg)**
.1f2f4|5-Tatraehlorobenzana
unadjusted valua (ng/kg|
a or dl
ACF
adjusted value (mg/kg)**
.1 ,2,4-Trl chLorobanzene
unadjusted value (ng/kg)
a or dl
ACF
adjusted valua I mg/kg)**
1
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
8.000
dl
1.00D
2.000
6.000
dl
1.000
6.000
a. ooo
dl
1.333
B.BB7
S
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
a. ODD
dl
1.000
2.000
5.000
dl
1.000
i.OOO
5.000
dl
1.333
B.6B7
Sample Sat
3
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
8.000
dl
1.000
2.000
5.000
dl
1.000
5.000
6.000
dl
1.333
B.BB7
4
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dL
1.000
2.000
5.000
dl
1.000
5.000
5.000
dl
1.333
6.667
6
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
5.000
dl
1.000
5,000
5.000
dl
1.333
8.887
B
10.000
dl
1.000
10.000
2.000
dl
1.000
2.000
6.000
dl
1.000
5.000
5.000
dl
1.333
8.667
* Accuracy Correction Factors are presented In the Background Document.
** Adjusted value = I Unadjusted value) x (ACF)
-------
Appendix E
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE
Page
List of boiling points for constituents of interest, E-l
List of bond dissociation energies for constituents of interest, E-2
-------
APPENDIX E
CONSTITUENT BOILING POINTS
Constituent
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9, Chlorobenzene
12. Chloroethane
14. Chloroform
15. Chloromethane
22. 1,1-D ichloroethane
23. 1,2-Dichloroethane
226. Ethyl benzene
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
42. Tetrachloroethane
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
46. 1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane
47. Trichloroethene
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexaehlorobutadlene
112. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
113. Hexachloroethane
115. Hexachloropropene
121. Naphthalene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
137. Pentachloroethane
141. Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Boiling Point {°C) Reference Number
76.7-77
131-132
12-12.3
61-62
(.24)-(-23
57-57.3
83-84
136.25
146.5-147
121
74-74.1
113-114
86.7-87
178
385
180.5-181
174-174.12
340
295
323-326
210-220
234
186.8-187
209-210
217.9-218
275-277
161-162
340
246
213
7)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1 s Merck Index (Reference 15).
2 = Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals (Reference 16).
3 s Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Reference 17).
E-i
-------
APPENDIX E
BOND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES
Constituents
7. Carbon tetrachloride
9. Chlorobenzene
12. Chloroethane
14. Chloroform
15. Chloromethane
22. 1,1-Dichloroethane
23. 1,2-Diehloroethane
41. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
42. Tetraohloroethene
45. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
46. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
47. Trichloroethane
68. Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
70. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
87. o-Dichlorobenzene
88. p-Dichlorobenzene
98. Di-n-butyl phthalate
109. Fluorene
110. Hexachlorobenzene
111. Hexachlorobutadiene
112. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
113. Hexachloroethane
115. Hexachloropropene
121. Naphthalene
136. Pentachlorobenzene
137. Pentachloroethane
141, Phenanthrene
148. 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
150. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Bond Dissociation Energy
380
1320
665
385
395
675
675
665
465
670
670
481
1290
6565
1330
1330
4285
2740
1310
855
1020
655
710
2120
1320
660
2900
1320
1325
Sources:
Sanderson, R,f. Chemical Bonds and Bond Energy (Reference 14).
Langes's Handbook of Chemistry (Reference 12).
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Reference 17).
E-2
-------
APPENDIX F
DETECTION LIMITS FOR UNTREATED WASTES
-------
TABLE S-2AJ KQ1S WASTE BOAT LIST CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMITS [VOLATILE5]
BOAT CONSTITUENT
DETECTION LIMIT **
SAMPLE SET II
DETECTION LIMIT •*
SAMPLE SETS #2 THROUGH 18
VOLATILE CONSTITUENTS? [ppffll
1
2
3
4
i
f
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
13
20
21
22
23
34
25
28
27
28
21
30
31
32
33
34
33
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
49
Acatonitrl La
AcroLaln
AcryLoni trlle
Benzene
ir omodl chL ororae thana
Bromorae thane
Carbon tatra chloride
Carbon d1 sulflda
Chloro benzene
2— Chloro— 1 t 3-toytadl ana
Chi or odlbr am ana thane
OiLo roe thana
2-Chloroathyl vinyl etnar
Chloroform
Chlorone thane
3-Chloropropena
1 ,2-Olbroiio-3-chloroproBana
1,2-01 bran oa thane
01 broacna thana
Trana-1 ,4-dt chLoro-2-butana
01 cnL orodl fUorcwa thane
1 , 1-01 cMoroettiana
1 ,2-01 chloroa thane
1,1-0) chloroa thy Lane
Trana-1 f2—dl chloroa thane
1 r2-C1cMoropropane
Trans-1 ,3— dl chLoroprapana
ol s-1 1 3-0 1 ch I o ropr ope na
1 ,4H31oxana
Ethyl cyanide
Ethyl nethacryleta
lodoaethane
Zeobutyl alcohol
Methyl athyl katona
Methyl eathacrylate
MathylacryLoni trlla
Me thy La na chloride
1 ,1 ,1 ,2-Tatrachloroethana
Tf1 ,2>2— Tatrachloroe thana
TetrecMoroe thane
Toluane
Tr 1 broaome thane
1 ,1 ,1-TH chloroa thane
1«1 ,2-Tr1chloroathane
TM chloroa thane
Trichloromonof luoronathana
1 ,2i3-TrichloropPOpana
1000
10000
1000
2000
200
200
2000
NA
2000
200
200
200
NA
'SOQO
200
200
200
200
200
10000
200
2000
2000
200
200
500
500
ma
HA
10000
200
200
200
1000
200
1000
1000
200
2000
2000
200
200
200
2000
2000
200
500
[ppra]
10000
100000
10000
2000
2000
2000
2000
NA
2000
2000
2000
2000
NA
2000
2000
SOOQ
2000
2000
2000
10000
2000
3000
2000
3000
2000
5000
5000
5000
NA
100000
2000
2000
2000
10000
2000
10000
10000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
5000
F-l
-------
TABLE S-2AS KD19 WASTE BOAT LIST CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMITS CVGLATILES]
DETECTION LIMIT "" DETECTION LIMIT *•
BOAT CONSTITUENT SAMPLE SET 11 SAMPLE SETS *2 THROUGH 16
SO
73
*
*
*
*
*
*
•
*
*
*
*
*
Vinyl chloride
a-Chloropropionl tr1 le -*•
Acetone
Ally I alcohol
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl ana oxide
2-Hexanone
Malononl trlla
4H4e thy l-3-pentanone
2-Propyn-l-ol
Styrana
Tri chloronathanatnlal
VI nyl a estate
Xylena [total]
200
NA
10 GO
NA
200
NA
1000
HA
1000
NA
200
HA
200
200
2000
HA
10000
MA
2000
NA
100QQ
NA
1QOOQ
NA
2000
NA
2000
2000
NA The standard Is not available! the compound ias searched using an NBS
library database of 42,000 conpounda.
* Thl9 constituent Is not on the Use of constituents In tha GENERIC QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FDR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM ("BOAT"],
EPA/530-SW-97-011, March 13S7, It 1fl a ground-water nonltoHng constituent
as listed 1n Appendix IX, Page 26839, of the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 51, No. 142.
•• Sample set II mas diluted by a factor of tan, analyzed, and quantltated.
Evan at this dilution, several target enalytas were outside the calibration
range. Thase analytaa Hera quantltated after raanalysis of the sample at a
dilution factor of 100, Tha detection Unite for sanpla sat 11 ere based
on tha ten factor dilution. Because sample sat 12 through IS ware similar
matrices to tttat of sample sat II, tfcay nara diluted by a factor of 100
before any analyses were performed.
+ The compound appear* In tha GENERIC QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
as a seoivolstHe constituent but «aa analyzed aa a voletlle constituent.
F-2
-------
TABLE 8-28: K019 WASTE BOAT LIST CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMITS INON-VOLATILES]
BOAT CONSTITUENT
SEHIVOLATILE CONSTITUENTS!
33 Methyl mathanasuironata +•
33 Pypidlne *
51 Acenaphthalena
52 Acaniphtnana
53 Acetophanona
54 2-Acatyl ami naf luorane
55 4-AsMrsobipheny I
56 AniUna
57 Anthpaeane
58 Ariaite
59 9anz(a}anthracana
SO Sanzanacnial
61 Benzldlna
62 Banio(a) pyrana
63 Benzol b) fluorantnana
84 Beniof g,h, 1 Ipapylana
85 8anzo( k] f luoranthana
66 p-Benjoquinane
67 B1s(2-cnloroath0xyl8th8n«
68 B1s(2-chlaroatfiyll9ther
69 81 3(2-chtoroi30prapy Uathar
70 8l3(2-«thy Lhaxy Llpnthalata
71 4-Bromophanyl phenyl ethap
72 Butyl banzyL phthalata
73 2-9ac-€usy 1-4,8-dlnl tro phenol
74 p— ChloraBnllirtB
75 ChlorobanzUata
7S p-Chloro-it-ci-asol
77 2-ettlorwaphtnBlBn»
78 2-Oiloraphamol
80 ChrytBn*
81 ortno-CrBsoi
82 pars-Crssol
63 01 benzC B.h)anthpac»n8
84 D1 banio(s,a]pypanB
85 01banza[a( i ] pyrana
86 ra-Olchtorobanzina
87 o-QIchlorobanzana
88 p-CHchlQpabanztna
89 3i3'~0-pfapyln1«pa80tninB
108 01 pfiany lamina
107 1 ,2-01 phany Lhydraz-i na
108 Fluopanthan*
,109 Ftuopane
110 Hnxacfilorobaniana
111 Haxachlorobutad! an«
112 He«»chloPocyclopantad1 ana
113 H»xtcftlof08than»
114 HaxschloPOphane
115 Haxachlopopropane
116 Indeno(1 ,2,3-cdj pyrene
117 Isosafpole
118 MathapyriLane
119 3-Wethy Icholanthpana
120 4,4<-i4athylanab1a(S-attlarsanU1ft«!
121 Napnchalena
122 1 ,4-«aphthoqu1none
123 1-N«phthy laaitna
124 2-NaphthylaailnB
129 p-N1troanU1na
128 Nltrobanzara
127 4-N1 trophanol
128 f»-N1troiod1-t>-tnjty lamina
129 f+-N1trQsodiathyUroint
130 K-H1trQsodlMthylBBi1nB
131 M-Nni-a»a*BthyUthyUiHnt
132 W-N1 troaomoppholtna
133 »-NUreu«plpiM
-------
TABLE B-SSs WJ19 WASTE IOAT LIST CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMITS [NOM-VOLATILES]
BOAT CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMIT
SEHIVQLATILES [CONTINUED] 5
144 Pranamida
145 Pyrtnt
146 Resorcinsl
147 Sefrole
148 1 ,2,4,5-TatraclUarobenztne
149 2,3,4,6-TitrtcHlsrophinol
1SO 1 r2i4-Tr1chl.orobanzene
151 2t4,5-Trichlorophinol
152 2»4fi-THchlarophenol
153 Trl3(2,3-d1broinopropy L] phosphate
• 7, 12-01 rasthy Ibenzla] anthracene
* alpn.al pha-QInethylphanathylaiilns
* Benzole scld
* Sanzyl alcohol
* 4-Chlaraphenyl pharryl tcher
* 01 banzofuran
* C1banio( a.hlpyrana
* Isopnorane
* 2-HetNyinaphtiitltne
• 2-N1 troani Una
" 3-MltrosuUine
* 2-NUroph»nol
* r*-Nt trosodi phanylaiiina
tppw]
50
10
NA
NA
25
SO
25
50
SQ
NA
23
SO
250
S3
25
10
NA
10
10
SO
50
50
10
BOAT CONSTITUENT DETECTION LIMIT
HETALS,
154 Antimony
155 Arsenic
158 Bar i un
157 BaryLUum
158 Cadmium
159 Chromium
159 CiroBiuBi, haxavalant
180 Capper
181 LiSd
182 Mercury
183 Nickel
184 SclenluB
1i5 Silver
*168 Thai 11 ua
167 Vanadium
188 Zinc
OTHER CONSTITUENTS s
189 Total Cyanide (ppm)
170 Fluoride [pp«5
171 Sulflda (ppral
ChloMne [%]
PHYSICAL PARAMETERS!
A«h Content (X)
Heating Value [Btu/lb!
Total Solids (X residual]
Paint PUtar Teat (X free liquid}
[ppra]
6
0.2
0.3
0,1
0.3
0.3
0.2
•j
0.2
0.05
2
0.5
' 0.3
0.2
2
0.8
Q.S
5
50
0.3
0.01
100
0.05
O.S
NA Th« standard Is not iv»U»bH» tha compound •«* March ad ualng an N8S library databasa of 4StOQQ
compounda.
• ThU constituent la not on tha list of constitutes tn tfta SENfRIC OOALITY ASSyRAWCE PROJECT PLAN
FOB LAND DISPOSAL HE3TRICTIONS PBOGflAM ("10AT"], EPA/S30-Si-87-01 1 , Waroh 1987. It ti a around-w
•on1 taring constUuant as Uata4 In Appandl « IX, Pag* 28S39, of tha FEDERAL RKISTEH, Vol. 31, No
+ Tha eo«pouncf appear i 1n Wi« SENERIC QUALITY ASSURANCE PRQUECf PLAN aa a yolatHa conafttiMnt but
•as analyzed as s saHivolatila eonatltuant.
142.
F-4
-------