United States       Prevention, Pesticides     EPA712-C-96-330
          Environmental Protection    and Toxic Substances     February 1996
          Agency         (7101)
&EPA   Microbial Pesticide
          Test Guidelines
          OPPTS 885.4100
          Avian Inhalation Test,
          Tier

-------
                           INTRODUCTION
     This guideline is one  of a  series  of test  guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental  Protection Agency for use  in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the  development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency  for review under Federal regulations.

     The Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has  developed this guideline through  a process of harmonization that
blended the testing  guidance  and requirements that  existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and  Toxics  (OPPT) and appeared in Title  40,
Chapter I,  Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations  (CFR),  the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical  Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization  for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).

     The purpose of harmonizing these  guidelines  into a single set of
OPPTS guidelines is to minimize  variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data  requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency  under  the Toxic  Substances  Control Act  (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).

     Final  Guideline Release: This guideline  is available from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on The Federal Bul-
letin   Board.   By  modem  dial   202-512-1387,  telnet   and   ftp:
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov    (IP     162.140.64.19),    internet:     http://
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov, or call 202-512-0132 for disks  or paper copies.
This guideline is also available electronically in ASCII and PDF (portable
document format) from the EPA Public Access Gopher  (gopher.epa.gov)
under the heading "Environmental Test  Methods and Guidelines."

-------
OPPTS 885.4100   Avian inhalation test, Tier I.
     (a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing requirements of the Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.).

     (2) Background. The source material used in developing this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline is OPP guideline  154A-17.  The Agency
recognizes that this test protocol has not yet been evaluated in the labora-
tory. An inhalation exposure may be acceptable in lieu of instillation and,
for some  microorganisms, the Agency may accept  a request for waiver
of this test with appropriate justification. It would be advisable to contact
the Agency before  performing  the respiratory testing.

     (b) Test standards. Data  on  avian respiratory pathogenicity of micro-
bial pest control agents (MPCAs)  must be derived from tests which satisfy
the purposes of the general test  standards  in  OPPTS  885.0001,  and all
the following test standards:

     (1) Test substance. The actual form  of the  material to be used as
the test substance  is described in OPPTS 885.4000.  In addition, any sub-
stances used to enhance  virulence or toxicity should be tested along with
the test substance.

     (2) Species. Testing shall be performed on one avian species (pref-
erably bobwhite quail). Other  species may be used but a justification must
be supplied based  on increased susceptibility to the  MPCA or ecological
considerations which preclude  the use of recommended species.

     (3) Age. Birds used in this  test should be from 14 to 28 days old
at the beginning of the  testing period.  Within a given test, all birds shall
be as close to the same age as possible.

     (4) Controls,  (i) A negative, nondosed control group is required.

     (ii) A concurrent control  group is required and shall be treated with
the pure active ingredient that has been inactivated in  such a way as to
preserve cellular integrity.

     (iii) After dosing,  two untreated  contact  control birds  are required
and  shall  be placed in with the treatment group receiving the maximum
hazard dosage.

     (5) Number  of birds per dosage level. Each treatment and control
group  shall  contain at least 10 birds.  When there is only one  treatment
group at least 30 birds shall be tested at that treatment level.

     (6) Route of  exposure. The test material  should be administered by
intranasal or intratracheal instillation. Depending on the physical properties
of the agent being tested, an  alternate  route, such as use of an aerosol,

-------
involving the respiratory tissues may be used.  However, use of the alter-
nate route must be justified.

    (7) Dosing  regimen. Birds should receive doses daily for 5 days.

    (8) Maximum hazard dosage level,  (i) The maximum hazard dose
is defined by the following formula:

    maximum daily dose (units) =

            [MPCA] in TGAI x 0.2 mL/kg BW x weight of test bird (kg)

where

    [MPCA] = concentration of MPCA

    TGAI = technical grade of active ingredient

    BW = body weight

    (ii) For MPCAs that produce a toxin, fractions of this dose should
be calculated for lower doses. A reason shall be provided  to support any
reduction in the highest dosage level.

    (9) Treatment concentrations. A single group of birds may be tested
at the maximum hazard dose. If deleterious effects, due either  to toxicity
or pathogenicity, are observed, sequentially lower doses should be tested
as described in paragraph (b)(10) of this guideline.

    (10) Determination of an LD50 or ID50.  (i) The  study endpoint
must be defined to reflect the pathological activity of the  specific agent
being tested, i.e.  if an MPCA is expected to produce a toxin and has little
or no  infectivity, the appropriate endpoint would be death of the test orga-
nism.  If, however, the major mechanism is pathogenicity,  a more appro-
priate endpoint would be overt symptomatology.

    (ii) The test data must establish that  the avian inhalation  LC50, de-
fined as the  dose required to kill 50 percent of the test organisms, or IC50,
defined as the  dose necessary to produce overt  symptomatology in  50 per-
cent of the  test  organisms, is  greater than the maximum  hazard  dosage
level.  If the  LC50 or IC50 is less than the  maximum hazard dose,  a suffi-
cient number of treatment levels should be tested in order to obtain a defin-
itive LC50 or IC50, if possible.

    (11) Duration of test. Control and treated birds  should be observed
for  at  least  30 days after dosing.  If symptomatology is manifest at the
thirtieth day, observation should continue until  recovery, mortality, or un-
equivocal moribundity is established.

-------
     (c) Reporting and evaluation of data. In addition to the information
specified in OPPTS  885.0001, the  test report shall contain the following
information:
     (1) Species.
     (2) Age of the birds tested.
     (3) Mean body  weights for each test  and control group at test initi-
ation and weekly thereafter.
     (4) Diet analysis (especially antibiotics).
     (5) Pen dimensions.
     (6) Ambient temperature and humidity.
     (7) Photoperiod and lighting.
     (8) Total feed consumption for each test and control group at weekly
intervals.
     (9) Method of test material preparation, concentration of the MPCA
and total dose.
     (10) Identification of vehicle or carrier used to disperse the agent and
the average amount of vehicle administered to each bird, if a vehicle other
than water is used.
     (11) Number of birds per treatment level;
     (12) Number of controls used;
     (13) Time and date of mortalities or symptom onset;
     (14) ID50  or  LD50, in appropriate units, with 95 percent confidence
limits, if obtained.
     (15) Results  of gross necropsy  and histopathological findings con-
ducted on all birds dying before termination of the test, on a representative
sample of those that survived,  and on two contact control birds. The ne-
cropsy report should include any evidence of respiratory tract involvement
and  involvement at distant sites including liver, kidney, spleen,  cerebro-
spinal system, gastrointestinal system. Blood samples should also be ana-
lyzed for abnormalities. Results should also include any attempts,  using
appropriate techniques, to reisolate the MPCA from examined tissues.
     (16) A clinical  assessment of any histopathological findings and le-
sions noted.
     (17) Assessment of the clinical  significance  of MPCA tissue  isola-
tions.

-------
     (d) Tier progression. (1) If any pathogenic or toxic effects are ob-
served at the maximum hazard dosage level in this study, testing at Tier
II,  environmental   expression  testing  (OPPTS  885.5000,  885.5200,
885.5300, and  885.5400)  is required as  specified in 40 CFR 158.740(e).
In some cases,  a subchronic test may serve to  better understanding of ef-
fects observed at the Tier I level and alleviate the need for Tier II testing.

     (2) If no pathogenic  effects are observed in this study, no additional
testing at higher tiers ordinarily is required. The Agency may require addi-
tional testing,  however, if it determines that there is a potential risk  to
birds despite the negative Tier I results.

     (e) References. The  following references are provided for use in the
development of test protocols for conducting  an avian inhalation patho-
genicity test with microbial pest control agents:

     (1) Friend, M. and D.O. Trainer. Fob/chlorinated biphenyl: interaction
with duck hepatitis virus. Science 170:1314-1316  (1970).

     (2) Friend, M. Experimental duck virus hepatitis in the mallard. Avian
Disease 16:692-699  (1971).

     (3)  Friend,  M..  Duck  hepatitis virus interaction with  DDT and
Dieldrin in  adult mallards. Bulletin  of Environmental Contaminant Toxi-
cology 7:202-206 (1972).

     (4) Friend, M.  Experimental DDT-Duck hepatitis virus  interaction
studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:887-895 (1974).

     (5) Friend, M. Experimental Dieldrin-Duck hepatitis virus interaction
studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:896-904 (1974).

     (6) Hartmann, G. C. and S. S.  Wasti.  Avian safety of three species
of entomogenous fungi.  Comparative Physiological Ecology  5:242-245
(1980).

     (7) Summers, M., R. Engler,  L.A. Falcon, and P. Vail, eds.pp. 179-
184. in: Guidelines for Safety Testing of Baculoviruses. Baculoviruses for
Insect Pest Control: Safety Considerations.  American Society for  Microbi-
ology, Washington, DC (1975).

-------