United States      Prevention, Pesticides    EPA712-C-98-088
          Environmental Protection   and Toxic Substances    January 1998
          Agency        (7101)
&EPA    Fate, Transport and
          Transformation Test
          Guidelines
          OPPTS 835.3300
          Soil Biodegradation

-------
                           INTRODUCTION
     This guideline is one  of a  series  of test  guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental  Protection Agency for use  in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the  development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency  for review under Federal regulations.

     The Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has  developed this guideline through  a process of harmonization that
blended the testing  guidance  and requirements that  existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and  Toxics  (OPPT) and appeared in Title  40,
Chapter I,  Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations  (CFR),  the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical  Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization  for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).

     The purpose of harmonizing these  guidelines  into a single set of
OPPTS  guidelines is to minimize variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data  requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency  under the Toxic  Substances  Control Act  (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).

     Final  Guideline Release: This guideline  is available from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on The Federal Bul-
letin  Board.   By  modem  dial   202-512-1387,  telnet   and   ftp:
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov  (IP 162.140.64.19), or  call 202-512-0132 for disks
or paper copies.  This  guideline is also available electronically in ASCII
and PDF (portable document format) from EPA's World Wide Web  site
(http://www.epa.gov/epahome/research.htm) under the heading "Research-
ers and  Scientists/Test Methods and Guidelines/OPPTS  Harmonized Test
Guidelines."

-------
OPPTS 835.3300   Soil biodegradation.
     (a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing  requirements   of  both  the  Federal   Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.) and the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601).

     (2) Background. The source materials used in developing  this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline  are the  OPPT guideline under  40 CFR
796.3400 and OECD 304 A Inherent Biodegradability in Soil.

     (b) Introductory information—(1) Prerequisites. 14C-labeled mate-
rial is required.

     (2) Guidance  information. Information  on the  toxicity of the test
compound  is useful for the interpretation of the data obtained. The  con-
centration of the test compound can then be adapted  to this  information.

     (3) Qualifying statements. The test is  applicable to volatile or non-
volatile, soluble or insoluble compounds which are not inhibitory to  micro-
organisms.  The mineralization rate refers to  the labeled carbonation only.
Therefore,  the location of the labelling within the structure  and the speci-
ficity of the label need careful consideration.

     (4) Recommendations, (i) The results obtained using the basic min-
eralization  test may be supported by determination of the evaporation rate
of the parent compound and some of possible  volatile metabolites and by
determination of soil extractable and nonextractable  residues. Both op-
tional tests  are described in this test guideline.

     (ii) Sometimes it  is recommended that information about  chemical
degradation under anaerobic conditions be obtained. Therefore, in accord-
ance with  the description below, the  biometer flask  filled with the soil
sample (preconditioning is not necessary), is flooded with water (2-3 cm
layer) to protect against leakage, evacuated and flushed with nitrogen sev-
eral  times.  Degradation may be  evaluated by means of measurements  of
methane gas and analysis of both water and soil for  14C-content.

     (5) Standard documents. This test guideline is based on the method
cited in paragraph (e)(l) of this guideline.

     (c) Method—(1) Introduction, purpose,  scope,  relevance, applica-
tion and limits of test,  (i) The method described in this test guideline
is  designed for  the  evaluation of the mineralization rate of a 14C-labeled
compound  in soil. The method is applicable to volatile or nonvolatile, solu-
ble or insoluble compounds which are not inhibitory to microorganisms.

     (ii) Definitions and units.  Soil is a mixture of mineral  and organic
chemical constituents, the latter containing compounds of high carbon and
nitrogen content and of high molecular weights, animated by small (mostly
micro-) organisms.  Soil may  be handled in two states: Undisturbed,  as

-------
it has grown with time, in characteristic layers of a variety of soil types,
or disturbed, as it is usually sampled by digging and used in the test de-
scribed here.

    Mineralization (in the context of this guideline) means extensive deg-
radation of  a molecule  during which a labelled carbon atom is oxidized
quantitatively with release of the appropriate amount of14 CO2.

    (iii) Reference substances. In some cases when investigating a new
substance reference substances may  be useful; however,  reference sub-
stances  cannot yet be recommended. Reference substances  need not be
employed in all cases when investigating a new substance. They may pri-
marily be used so that calibration of the method may be performed from
time to time and to permit comparison of results  when  another method
is employed.

    (iv) Principle  of the test method—(A) Basic  test. (7) A small sam-
ple of soil is treated with the 14 C-labeled test chemical in a biometer flask
apparatus. Release of 14 CCh from the test chemical is measured by means
of alkali absorption and liquid scintillation counting.

    (2) Optional  experiments include the following  tests.

    (B) Evaporation test. When testing chemicals  of a vapor pressure
higher than  0.0133  Pa, a polyurethane foam plug is placed into the biom-
eter flask apparatus to absorb  the  labelled volatile  part of the  parent
compound and volatile metabolites for liquid scintillation counting.

    (C) Residue test. At the point  of  50  percent  mineralization the test
soil may be extracted. The extractable  portion of the compound,  and its
metabolites remaining in the soil, may be determined by liquid scintillation
counting.  Furthermore,  data on the bound residue  part may be obtained
by measuring the  14 CO2 released after combustion of the soil.

    (v) Quality  criteria—(A) Reproducibility. Reproducibility is good
if  standard conditions, especially preconditioning of the soil, are  strictly
observed.

    (B) Sensitivity. The evaluation  of  sensitivity is not relevant because
a moderate amount as 37-185 kBq (=1-5 (iCi)  of 14 C-labeled test chemi-
cals is used for each experiment.

    (C)  Specificity.  The method is  only  applicable  if 14 C-labeled  test
chemicals are available.  The specificity is very good.

    (D)  Possibility of standardization. This  procedure  is  standardized
to  a limited extent. The limitation is related to the difficulty of standardiza-
tion of soil samples between laboratories.

-------
     (2)  Description  of the  test  procedure—(i)  Preparations—(A)
Equipment. (7) Liquid scintillation counter.

     (2) Oxidizer for combustion of radioactive material.

     (3) Ultrasonic bath, 500 mL.

     (4) Glassware: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks fused to 50 mL round bot-
tom tubes (biometer flasks, see Figure 1); 25 mL syringes (e.g. Luer-Lok);
15 gauge syringe needle,  15 cm in length; 100 \\L syringes (e.g. Hamilton);
25 mL graduated cylinders with stopper; 1 mL pipets;  Soxhlet extraction
apparatus; scintillation vials; polyurethane plugs, 30 mm diameter, 30 mm
length, density  16 kg/m3

     (B) Reagents—(7) Test substance: 14 C-labeled compounds are dis-
solved  in  water  or  acetone  to  give radioactivity  of 37-185  KBq
(=1-5 (iCi)/100 (iL. Using unlabeled material this solution is made up  to
the required concentration (e.g. 0.5 mg/100  \\L = 10 mg/kg soil, or depend-
ing on the toxicity of the  substance).

     (2) Chemicals. (/) KOH, analytical grade, 0.1 N solution.

     (if) Acetone, analytical grade.

     (fff) Methanol, analytical grade (for optional tests).

     (fv) w-Hexane,  analytical grade (for optional test).

     (v) Ascarite (A.H. Thomas Co. Philadelphia or equivalent).

     (vf) Scintillation cocktail.

     (3) Soil. (/) Alfisol: pH between 5.5 and 6.5  organic carbon content
between 1 and  1.5 percent clay content (i.e. particles <0.002 mm in diame-
ter) between 10 and 20 percent cation exchange capacity between 10 and
15 mval.

     (//) Spodosol: pH between 4.0 and 5.0 organic carbon content between
1.5 and 3.5 percent clay content  <10  percent cation exchange  capacity
< 10 mval.

     (fff) Entisol:  pH between 6.6 and 8.0 organic carbon content between
1 and 4 percent clay content between  11 and 25 percent cation exchange
capacity > 10 mval.

In special cases it is recommended that two additional soils be used:  One
with high silt-fraction (diameter between 0.002 and  0.063 mm) content,
the other with  a high clay content (30 percent). Air dried test soil stored
at  +4 °C is  remoisturized to 40  per cent maximum water capacity. After
incubation for 2 weeks at 22 + 2 °C  in the  dark it is ready for the experi-
ments.

-------
     (ii) Test  conditions—(A) Test temperature. During the whole test
period the flasks are incubated in the dark at 22 ±2 °C.

     (B) Soil characterization data. (7) for determination of the pH value
of the soil for selecting the  soil type,  10 g air-dried soil  is suspended
in25mL0.01MCaCl2.

     (2) After standing overnight, the  sample is disturbed once more and
measured in a potentiometric apparatus with a 0.1 M KC1 electrode. Imme-
diately before the measurement the instrument must be calibrated with two
standard  solutions within the measuring range of the  sample values ex-
pected.

     (3) For  determination of the organic carbon content of the  soil for
selecting  the  soil  type,  1.0 g air-dried  soil is  heated  with  15  mL
2M K2Kicr2O7 and 20 ml H2SO4 (analytical reagent, pc =  1.84  g/cm3)
at 145-155  ° C for 15 min. After  cooling  to room temperature  sample
volume is made up to 150 mL with distilled water. A 20 mL aliquot is
measured spectrophotometrically,  after centrifuging, in a 1 cm cuvet at
590 nm compared  to distilled water. The  self-destroying property of the
K2Cr2O7 reagent must be determined  by two blank samples. Calculation
is conducted using the following equation:
                         1,000 x v x E2(EX - OC2 x c)
            C =	
                           e x EI x (a, - OC2 x F)
where
C = carbon content (percent)
V = gross volume (mL)
EI = equivalent weight of Cr2O3 (25.332)
E2 = equivalent weight of carbon (3.0028)
Ex = extinction at 590 nm and 1 cm layer thickness
F = factor for calculating K^C^O? from C^Os
c = concentration of Cr (g) per 100 mL (= 1.9356)
e = sample weight (mg)
oci = extinction  coefficient of Cr(III); oci is an average value from five single
    determinations for the  calibration curve, each obtained by division of EX
    by the amount of Cr2O3 (g)
OC2 = extinction  coefficient of Cr(VI); a2 is an average value from two single
    estimations, each obtained by division of Ex by the respective amounts of
    K2Cr2O7.
     (4) To determine  particle size of the soil for selecting the soil type,
10.0 g air-dried soil is  reacted with  100  mL H2O2  (15 percent W/V) for
15 h, heated until  CO2 evolution is  complete.  The suspension is left to
stand overnight with 25 mL 0.4  N Na4P2Oy, after which water is added

-------
to make it up to 250 mL  and the  solution is sieved through a mesh of
0.2 mm width. The  portion <0.2 mm is  fractionated further by sieving.
The smaller particles (silty  fractions) are fractionated by homogenous par-
titioning of the  particles in the aqueous  medium, which is made  up to
1,000 mL with water in an elutriating cylinder.

    (5) Portions (10 mL)  are removed by pipet from various heights of
the cylinder after different sedimentation  times; measurement of the dry
weights of the suspended material in these  portions yields the particle com-
position according to the following scheme:
Particle fraction
diameter (mm)
<0.002 ....
<0.0063
<0.02
<0063


20

1h 33min 49sec
9min 19sec
59sec

Dipping depth (cm)
15 10
	 7h 45min
1h 10min 52sec 46min 55sec
6min 59sec 4min 39sec
42sec


5
3h 52min
23min 27sec
2min 20sec

     (6) For determination of the cation exchange capacity of the soil, in
order to select the soil type, a glass column 15 cm in length and 30 mm
i. d. is reduced in diameter at one end like a funnel. This side is stuffed
with glass wool. About 1  cm quartz sand is spread on the wool, followed
by  10.0 g air-dried test soil, which is in turn covered by about 1 cm of
quartz sand. Forty milliliters of a mixed solution consisting of 100 g tri-
ethanolamine in 2  L water (adjusted to  ph 8.1 with HC1) plus 100  g
BaCL: 2H2O in 2 L) is poured over these layers. After  1  h the solution
is collected  in a 250 mL  Erlenmyer flask. The procedure is repeated. In
addition, 40 mL of a solution  of 25 g BaCL: 2H2O in  1 L is poured onto
the  column.

     (7) This solution is collected after standing overnight and the column
is washed with 100 mL water. The combined eluates  are titrated against
HC1 (bromocresol green plus  methyl red as indicators)  to measure H+,
Ca2+, K+, Na+. The  column  is leached in a similar  mannner with 200
mL of 20 g  MgCl2 6H2O in 1 L water for the determination of Ba2+. This
cation is determined by flame absorption spectrophotometry. The cation
exchange capacity is expressed as  the sum of all the cation equivalents
sorbed by 100 g soil.

     (iii) Performance of test—(A)  Basic test.  (7)  Fifty grams of soil
(dry weight  basis) is placed into each Erlenmeyer part (H) of the biometer
flask (see the following Figure 1). The radioactive test solution (100 (iL)
is added in  50 drops over the whole soil  surface (I)  of each flask. The
soil  is carefully mixed with a Pasteur pipet (from which the lower part
is cut off) and left in the flask.

-------
                        FIGURE 1—TEST FLASK
     (2) In addition,  an equivalent volume of test  solution is  placed in
a 100 mL volumetric flask for direct determination of the added radioactiv-
ity.
        The biometer flask is closed with a Teflon-coated silicon rubber
stopper through which an Ascarite filter (F) is  inserted. The filter (F) is
provided with  a  stopper and  stopcock (G).  The side tube (C) is sealed
with a teflon stopper pierced by a 15-gauge  needle (B), 15 cm long. The
needle (B) is capped by a silicone rubber stopper (A), and its tip at (D)
is  covered with a short length of silicone tubing that remains in contact
with the base of the side tube (C).

     (4) The unit is charged by injecting 10 mL of alkali  solution into
the side tube (C) in the following manner: the small stopper (A) is replaced
by a calibrated Luer Lok syringe containing 0. 1  N KOH; the filter stopper
on (F) is removed and the stopcock (G) is opened; the alkali solution is
introduced through the needle (B) into the  side tube  (C); the stopcock
is  closed;  the syringe is removed; the small stopper (A) and filter stopper
on (F) are  returned to their initial positions. The 14 C-carbon dioxide pro-
duced is absorbed by the alkali.

-------
     (5) To recover the 14 C02-loaded alkali for liquid scintillation analysis,
the procedure for charging  each parallel unit at increasing time intervals
after start of the  experiment is performed in reverse order. Thereafter the
side tube (C) is rinsed with 5 mL alkali. Before recharging the side tube
(C) fresh alkali,  3 volumes of 25 mL air are  sucked through the system
with the empty syringe  to  maintain the soil in an aerobic condition. A
1 mL aliquot of the alkali solution is taken for liquid scintillation counting.

     (6) Experiment duration times  of  1, 2,  4, 8,  16, 32 and—if nec-
essary—64 days should be chosen for measurement. The test requires par-
allel determinations. The 14CC>2 radioactivity recovered is plotted versus
time. This graph  shows when to terminate the experiment.  Incubation time
is sufficient,  when a total of 50 per cent CCh  expressed as 14C originally
applied can be measured. Incubation should be stopped after reaching 64
days, whether or not this value is obtained.

     (B) Optional tests—(7) Estimation of evaporation.  If the volatility
of a chemical is  higher  than 10 5 torr at 20 °C, it is recommended  that
a 3  cm diameter  polyurethane  foam plug be  introduced  into the arm E
of the  biometer flask. This  plug absorbs the volatile parent compound as
well as volatile organic  degradation products but does not absorb 14CC>2.
The plugs are extracted in a Soxhlet extraction apparatus with an w-hexane/
methanol  mixture (1:4), and aliquots  are taken  for  liquid scintillation
counting.

     (2) Determination of soil-extractable and  non-extractable  resi-
dues. (/) In cases of relatively persistent  chemicals  (50 percent mineraliza-
tion in 10 days),  further  information concerning the soil-extractable radio-
activity (parent compound plus degradation products) and  soil bound resi-
dues is recommended.

     (if) For  this purpose two further biometer  flasks in  addition to the
four others must be prepared. At the point of 50 (or x-) percent mineraliza-
tion in the basic test, the soil in the two separate biometer flasks is ex-
tracted with  100  mL acetone (5 min ultrasonic treatment)  followed by an
extraction with methanol in the  same manner. Aliquots of the combined
extracts are taken for liquid scintillation counting. Other  extract  portions
may be used—if necessary—for further identification studies.

     (///) Aliquots of the air dried soil are combusted to 14CC>2 and meas-
ured by liquid  scintillation counting to determine the soil  bound residues.

     (d) Data and reporting—(1)  Treatment of results—(i) Basic test.
Radioactivity values for 14CC>2  (average of 4 parallel experiments) ob-
tained  from the alkali solution  after 1,  2, 4,  8, 16, 32 and  64  days are
expressed as the percentage  of test chemical (radioactivity)  initially applied
and are plotted in a graph versus time.  The time at which 50 percent of
the radioactivity is recovered as  14CC>2 is considered to be  the "50 percent

-------
mineralization''  level.  If this level has not been reached by the 64th day,
the data at this time are taken and expressed as X-percent-mineralization.

     (ii) Evaporation  test. The radioactivity of vaporized (and trapped)
original  compound plus  degradation  products  at  the  point  of 50-
(or X-) percent mineralization is extracted, measured and interpreted as
the percentage of volatilization at the point of 50- (or X-) percent-min-
eralization.

     (iii) Residue test. Radioactivity values for extractable and non-ex-
tractable residues of the parent compound plus degradation products ob-
tained after  the  extraction procedure  of the  soil  at the point of 50-
(or X-) percent-mineralization are given.

     (2) Test report.  The report of the degradability of  a test  chemical
must include:

     (i) Name of the test chemical, formula.

     (ii) Amount applied, if not standard.

     (iii) Exact characteristic data of the soil used.

     (iv) Dates of the performance of the measurements.

     (3) Interpretation and evaluation of results.  The results are  artifi-
cial because  they are obtained with  disturbed soil. However,  since stand-
ardized soils are used, the test  data are intercomparable  and enable the
experimentator to group relatively the  chemicals  tested within one scale
for this property.

     (e) References. The following references should be consulted for ad-
ditional background information on this test guideline.

     (1) Bartha, R. and Pramer D. Soil Science 100:68-70 (1965).

     (2) Soil  Survey Staff. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Taxonomy
Handbook No. 436. Washington, DC (1975).

     (3) Butler,  B.E. Soil Classification for Soil Survey Oxford (980) p.
129.
                                  8

-------