United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA712-C-98-192
Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances August 1998
Agency (7101)
&EPA Health Effects Test
Guidelines
OPPTS 870.1200
Acute Dermal Toxicity
-------
INTRODUCTION
This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency for review under Federal regulations.
The Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has developed this guideline through a process of harmonization that
blended the testing guidance and requirements that existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) and appeared in Title 40,
Chapter I, Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).
The purpose of harmonizing these guidelines into a single set of
OPPTS guidelines is to minimize variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency under the Toxic Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).
Final Guideline Release: This guideline is available from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on disks or paper
copies: call (202) 512-0132. This guideline is also available electronically
in PDF (portable document format) from EPA's World Wide Web site
(http://www.epa.gov/epahome/research.htm) under the heading "Research-
ers and Scientists/Test Methods and Guidelines/OPPTS Harmonized Test
Guidelines."
-------
OPPTS 870.1200 Acute dermal toxicity.
(a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing requirements of both the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.) and the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601).
(2) Background. The source materials used in developing this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline are 40 CFR 798.1100 Acute Dermal Tox-
icity; OPP 81-2 Acute Dermal Toxicity (Pesticide Assessment Guidelines,
Subdivision F—Hazard Evaluation; Human and Domestic Animals) EPA
report 540/09-82-025, 1982; and OECD 402 Acute Dermal Toxicity.
(b) Purpose. In the assessment and evaluation of the toxic character-
istics of a substance, determination of acute dermal toxicity is useful where
exposure by the dermal route is likely. It provides information on health
hazards likely to arise from short-term exposure by the dermal route. Data
from an acute study may serve as a basis for classification and labeling.
It is an initial step in establishing a dosage regimen in subchronic and
other studies and may provide information on dermal absorption and the
mode of toxic action of a substance by this route. An evaluation of acute
toxicity data should include the relationship, if any, between the exposure
of animals to the test substance and the incidence and severity of all abnor-
malities, including behavioral and clinical abnormalities, the reversibility
of observed abnormalities, gross lesions, body weight changes, effects on
mortality, and any other toxic effects.
(c) Definitions. The definitions in section 3 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) and the definitions in 40 CFR Part 792—Good Lab-
oratory Practice Standards apply to this test guideline. The following defi-
nitions also apply to this test guideline.
Acute dermal toxicity is the adverse effects occurring within a short
time of dermal application of a single dose of a substance or multiple
doses given within a 24-h period.
Dosage is a general term comprising the dose, its frequency and the
duration of dosing.
Dose is the amount of test substance applied. Dose is expressed as
weight of test substance (grams, milligrams) per unit weight of test animal
(e.g. milligrams per kilogram).
Dose-effect is the relationship between the dose and the magnitude
of a defined biological effect either in an individual or in a population
sample.
Dose-response is the relationship between the dose and the proportion
of a population sample showing a defined effect.
-------
(median lethal dose), dermal, is a statistically derived estimate
of a single dose of a substance that can be expected to cause death in
50 percent of treated animals when applied to the skin. The LDso value
is expressed in terms of weight of test substance per unit weight of test
animal (milligrams per kilogram).
(d) Approaches to the determination of acute toxicity. (1) EPA
recommends the following means to reduce the number of animals used
to evaluate acute effects of chemical exposure while preserving its ability
to make reasonable judgments about safety:
(i) Using data from substantially similar mixtures. In order to mini-
mize the need for animal testing, the Agency encourages the review of
existing acute toxicity information on mixtures that are substantially simi-
lar to the mixture under investigation. In certain cases it may be possible
to glean enough information to make preliminary hazard evaluations that
may reduce the need for further animal testing.
(ii) Limit test. When data on structurally related chemicals are inad-
equate, a limit test may be considered. If rodents are used, a limit dose
of at least 2,000 mg/kg bodyweight may be administered to a single group
of five males and five females using the procedures described under para-
graph (e) of this guideline. If no lethality is demonstrated, no further test-
ing for acute dermal toxicity is needed. (Under current policy for pesticide
products, precautionary statements may still be required unless there are
data to indicate the LDso is greater than 5,000 mg/kg.) If compound-related
mortality is produced, further study may need to be considered.
(2) [Reserved]
(e) Conventional acute toxicity test—(1) Principle of the test meth-
od. The test substance is applied dermally in graduated doses to several
groups of experimental animals, one dose being used per group. The doses
chosen may be based on the results of a range finding test. Subsequently,
observations of effects and deaths are made. Animals that die during the
test are necropsied, and at the conclusion of the test the surviving animals
are sacrificed and necropsied. This guideline is directed primarily to stud-
ies in either rats, rabbits, or guinea pigs but may be adapted for studies
in other species. Animals showing severe and enduring signs of distress
and pain may need to be humanely killed. Dosing test substances in a
way known to cause marked pain and distress due to corrosive or irritating
properties need not be carried out.
(2) Substance to be tested. Test, control, and reference substances
are discussed in 40 CFR Part 792—Good Laboratory Practice Standards.
(3) Test procedures—(i) Preparations. Healthy young adult animals
are acclimatized to the laboratory conditions for at least 5 days prior to
-------
the test before the test animals are randomized and assigned to the treat-
ment groups.
(ii) Animal selection — (A) Species and strain. The rat, rabbit, or
guinea pig may be used. The albino rabbit is preferred because of its size,
ease of handling, skin permeability, and extensive data base. Commonly
used laboratory strains should be employed. If a species other than rats,
rabbits, or guinea pigs is used, the tester should provide justification and
reasoning for its selection.
(B) Age. Young adult animals, rats between 8- and 12-weeks-old,
rabbits at least 12-weeks-old, and guinea pigs between 5- and 6-weeks-
old at the beginning of dosing should be used. The weight variation of
animals used in a test should be within 20 percent of the mean weight
for each sex.
(C) Number and sex of animals. (7) At least five experimentally
naive animals with healthy intact skin are used at each dose level. They
should all be of the same sex. After completion of the study in one sex,
at least one group of five animals of the other sex is dosed to establish
that animals of this sex are not markedly more sensitive to the test sub-
stance. The use of fewer animals may be justified in individual cir-
cumstances. Where adequate information is available to demonstrate that
animals of the sex tested are markedly more sensitive, testing in animals
of the other sex may be dispensed with. An acceptable option would be
to test at least one group of five animals per sex at one or more dose
levels to definitively determine the more sensitive sex prior to conducting
the main study.
(2) The females should be nulliparous and nonpregnant.
In acute toxicity tests with animals of a higher order than those
mentioned above, the use of smaller numbers should be considered.
(D) Assignment of animals. Each animal must be assigned a unique
identification number. A system to randomly assign animals to test groups
and control groups is required.
(E) Housing. Animals should be housed in individual cages.
(7) The temperature of the experimental animal rooms should be at
22 + 3 °C for rodents, 20 + 3 °C for rabbits.
(2) The relative humidity of the experimental animal rooms should
be 30 to 70 percent.
Where lighting is artificial, the sequence should be 12-h light/
12-h dark.
-------
(4) For feeding, conventional laboratory diets may be used with an
unlimited supply of drinking water.
(iii) Dose levels and dose selection. (A) Three dose levels should
be used and spaced appropriately to produce test groups with a range of
toxic effects and mortality rates. The data should be sufficient to produce
a dose-response curve and permit an acceptable estimation of the median
lethal dose. Range finding studies using single animals may help to esti-
mate the positioning of the dose groups so that no more than three dose
levels will be necessary. An acceptable option for pesticide products would
be to set the dose levels in correlation with the OPP toxicity categories
(bracketing). In these cases, the determination of an LD50 may not be nec-
essary.
(B) Limit test. This test is described under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this
guideline.
(C) Vehicle. Solids should be pulverized when possible. The test sub-
stance should be moistened sufficiently with water or, where necessary,
a suitable vehicle to ensure good contact with skin. If a vehicle or diluent
is needed, it should not elicit toxic effects itself nor substantially alter
the chemical or toxicological properties of the test substance. In addition,
the influence of the vehicle on penetration of skin by the test substance
should be taken into account. It is recommended that wherever possible
the use of an aqueous solution be considered first, followed by consider-
ation of a solution in oil (e.g. corn oil), and then by consideration of pos-
sible solution in other vehicles. For nonaqueous vehicles the toxic charac-
teristics of the vehicle should be known, and if not known should be deter-
mined before the test. Acceptable alternative vehicles include gum arabic,
ethanol and water, carboxymethyl cellulose, glycerol, propylene glycol,
PEG vegetable oil, and mineral oil as long as the vehicle is not irritating
and the inability to use water or saline is justified in the report.
(iv) Exposure and exposure duration. The test substance should be
administered over a period of 24 h.
(v) Preparation of animal skin. Fur should be clipped from the dor-
sal area of the trunk of the test animals. Shaving may be employed, but
it should be carried out at least 24 h before dosing. Care must be taken
to avoid abrading the skin, which would alter its permeability.
(vi) Application of test substance. (A) The test substance should
be applied uniformly over a shaved or clipped area which is approximately
10 percent of the body surface area. The area starting at the scapulae
(shoulders) to the wing of the ileum (hip bone) and half way down the
flank on each side of the animal should be shaved or clipped. Liquid test
materials should be undiluted if possible. With highly toxic substances,
the surface area covered may be less, but as much of the area as possible
should be covered with as thin and uniform a film as practical. The test
-------
material is not removed until 24 h after application. In the case where
less than 10 percent of the surface area is covered an approximation of
the exposed areas should be determined.
(B) The test substance should be held in contact with the skin with
a porous gauze dressing (<8 ply) and nonirritating tape throughout a
24-h exposure period. The test site should be further covered in a suitable
manner to retain the gauze dressing and test substance and ensure that
the animals cannot ingest the test substance. Restrainers may be used to
prevent the ingestion of the test substance, but complete immobilization
is not a recommended method. Although a semiocclusive dressing is pre-
ferred, an occlusive dressing will also be acceptable.
(C) At the end of the exposure period, residual test substance should
be removed where practicable using water or an appropriate solvent.
(vii) Observation period. Although 14 days is recommended as a
minimum observation period, the duration of observation should not be
fixed rigidly. It should be determined by the toxic reactions, rate of onset,
and length of recovery period, and may thus be extended when considered
necessary. The time at which signs of toxicity appear, their duration, and
the time to death are important, especially if there is a tendency for deaths
to be delayed.
(viii) Observation of animals. (A) A careful clinical examination
should be made at least once each day.
(B) Additional observations should be made daily, especially in the
early days of the study. Appropriate actions should be taken to minimize
loss of animals to the study (e.g. necropsy or refrigeration of those animals
found dead and isolation of weak or moribund animals).
(C) Observations should be detailed and carefully recorded, preferably
using explicitly defined scales. Observations should include, but not be
limited to, evaluation of skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes, res-
piratory and circulatory effects, autonomic effects such as salivation,
central nervous system effects, including tremors and convulsions, changes
in the level of activity, gait and posture, reactivity to handling or sensory
stimuli, altered strength, and stereotypies or bizarre behavior (e.g. self-
mutilation, walking backwards).
(D) Individual weights of animals should be determined shortly before
the test substance is administered, weekly thereafter, and at death. Changes
in weights should be calculated and recorded when survival exceeds one
day.
(E) The time of death should be recorded as precisely as possible.
(ix) Gross pathology. (A) At the end of the test, surviving animals
should be weighed and sacrificed.
-------
(B) A gross necropsy should be performed on all animals under test.
All gross pathology changes should be recorded.
(C) If necropsy cannot be performed immediately after a dead animal
is discovered, the animal should be refrigerated (not frozen) at tempera-
tures low enough to minimize autolysis. Necropsies should be performed
as soon as practicable, normally within a day or two.
(x) Additional evaluations. Microscopic examination of organs
showing evidence of gross pathology in animals surviving 24 h or more
should also be considered because it may yield useful information.
(xi) Data and reporting—(A) Treatment of results. Data should
be summarized in tabular form, showing for each test group the number
of animals at the start of the test, body weights, time of death of individual
animals at different dose levels, number of animals displaying other signs
of toxicity, description of toxic effects and necropsy findings. Any meth-
ods used for calculation of the LDso or any other parameters should be
specified and referenced. Methods for parameter estimation are described
under paragraphs (f)(l), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this guideline.
(B) Evaluation of results. An evaluation should include the relation-
ship, if any, between exposure of the animals to the test substance and
the incidence and severity of all abnormalities, including behavioral and
clinical abnormalities, gross lesions, body weight changes, effects on mor-
tality, and any other toxic effects. The LDso value should always be con-
sidered in conjunction with the observed toxic effects and any necropsy
findings. The LD50 value is a relatively coarse measurement, useful only
as a reference value for classification and labeling purposes, and for an
expression of the lethal potential of the test substance by the ingestion
route. Reference should always be made to the experimental animal spe-
cies in which the LDso value was obtained.
(C) Test report. In addition to the reporting requirements as specified
under 40 CFR part 792, subpart J and 40 CFR part 160, subpart J, the
following specific information should be reported. The test report should
include:
(7) Species, strain, sex, and source of test animals.
(2) Method of randomization in assigning animals to test and control
groups.
(3) Rationale for selection of species, if other than that recommended.
(4) Tabulation of individual and test group data by sex and dose level
(e.g. number of animals exposed, number of animals showing signs of
toxicity and number of animals that died or were killed during the test).
-------
(/) Description of toxic effects, including their time of onset, duration,
reversibility, and relationship to dose.
(//) Body weights.
(Hi) Time of dosing and time of death after dosing.
(iv) Dose-response curves for mortality and other toxic effects (when
permitted by the method of determination).
(v) Gross pathology findings.
(vi) Histopathology findings and any additional clinical chemistry
evaluations, if performed.
(5) Description of any pre-test conditioning, including diet, quarantine
and treatment for disease.
(6) Description of caging conditions including: Number (or change
in number) of animals per cage, bedding material, ambient temperature
and humidity, photoperiod, and identification of diet of test animals.
(7) Manufacturer, source, purity, and lot number of test substance.
(8) Relevant properties of substance tested including physical state
and pH (if applicable).
(9) Identification and composition of any vehicles (e.g., diluents, sus-
pending agents, and emulsifiers) or other materials used in administering
the test substance.
(10) A list of references cited in the body of the report. References
to any published literature used in developing the test protocol, performing
the testing, making and interpreting observations, and compiling and evalu-
ating the results.
(f) References. The following references should be consulted for ad-
ditional background information on this test guideline:
(1) Chanter, D.O. and Heywood, R., The LD50 Test: Some Consider-
ations of Precision, Toxicology Letters 10:303-307 (1982).
(2) Finney, D.J. Chapter 3—Estimation of the median effective dose
and Chapter 4-Maximum likelihood estimation, Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.
Cambridge, London (1971).
(3) Finney, D.J. The Median Lethal Dose and Its Estimation. Archives
of Toxicology 56:215-218 (1985).
(4) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Final Draft OECD Guideline 425:
-------
Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure to be adopted in the Tenth
Addendum to the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals.
(5) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline 420: Acute Oral Tox-
icity—Fixed Dose Method. Adopted: July 17, 1992.
(6) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline 423: Acute Oral Tox-
icity—Acute Toxic Class Method. Adopted: March 22, 1996
(7) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline 402: Acute Dermal Tox-
icity. Adopted: February 24, 1987.
8
------- |