United States
                      Environmental Protection
                      Agency
 Off ice of Water
 Washington, D.C.
EPA832-F-01-004
September 2001
                      Storm Water
                      Technology  Fact Sheet
                      Baffle  Boxes
DESCRIPTION

Baffle boxes are concrete or fiberglass structures
containing a series of sediment settling chambers
separated by baffles. The primary function of baffle
boxes is to remove sediment, suspended particles,
and associated pollutants from storm water. Baffle
boxes may also contain trash screens or skimmers
to capture larger materials,  trash, and floatables.
Baffle boxes are located either in-line or at the end
of storm pipes. Figure 1 shows a typical baffle box
design.

The use of baffle boxes for pollutant removal is
based on the concept of slowing the flow velocity
through the box, thereby  allowing  solids and
associated pollutants to settle to the bottom of the
box. Storm water enters the box and begins to fill
the first chamber. As water encounters the baffles,
flow velocity decreases, allowing particles with a
settling velocity greater than the horizontal flow
velocity to settle to the bottom of the box.  In
addition to decreasing flow velocities, the baffles
impede particle movement.  As suspended solids
strike the  baffles they begin  to settle.   Larger
particles usually settle out first and accumulate in
the first chambers while smaller particles usually
settle out in subsequent chambers.
                ACCUMULATED
                  SEDIMENT
Source: Modified from Suntree Technologies, Inc., 2000.
                     FIGURE 1 SCHEMATIC OF A BAFFLE BOX

-------
APPLICABILITY

Baffle boxes have proven effective in removing
sediment from storm water runoff. They are mainly
utilized in areas where sediment  control is a
primary concern, while other storm water Best
Management Practices  (BMPs)  may be  more
effective in areas where additional storm water
pollutants,  such as dissolved nutrients,  oil and
grease, or metals, are prevalent.

Florida has used baffle boxes for several years.  By
1998, Brevard County, Florida, had 42 baffle boxes
serving residential areas, collecting runoff from
lawns,  driveways,  and  streets.     Sediment
accumulation in the baffle boxes varies greatly and
depends on site characteristics  such as drainage
area, land use,  soil type, and slope.  In addition,
non-wet  weather flows,  such as  runoff from
domestic activities like washing cars or watering
lawns, can increase sediment contributions to storm
sewers.

Baffle boxes are ideally suited for retrofitting into
existing storm pipes. Baffle boxes for pipes up to
48  inches  in diameter  can  be precast,  making
installation quick and cost-efficient.  Baffle boxes
can be used for pipes up to 60 inches in diameter,
but these boxes  must be cast in place, making them
more expensive and time-consuming to install.

Baffle boxes are principally designed for sediment
removal, but trash racks, screens, or skimmers can
be installed to trap floatables and oil and grease as
well.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Baffle boxes are simple, inexpensive storm water
BMPs that  effectively  remove  sediment  and
suspended  solids from storm water.  A primary
advantage  of baffle boxes  is that  they can be
retrofitted  into  existing storm lines,  allowing
installation within existing rights-of-way. This is
especially  important in  areas  where land  is
unavailable or too expensive for other storm water
BMPs.

A major disadvantage of baffle boxes is that they
require   significant   maintenance  to   remove
accumulated sediment. If the boxes are not cleaned
regularly,  subsequent storms  may  resuspend the
accumulated sediment and carry it out of the box,
reducing the overall pollutant removal efficiency.
Also, because many trash racks installed in baffle
boxes are hinged at the top to prevent damage from
high  hydraulic  pressure,  they  may  release
accumulated trash during high flows.  Based on
their experience with baffle  boxes, officials in
Brevard County recommend checking and cleaning
them every two to  three months during the dry
season,  and every month  during the wet season
(Bateman, et. al., 1998, and National Resources
Defense Council, 1999).

Another disadvantage is that baffle boxes are not
designed for nutrient removal, and may not  be an
appropriate storm water BMP if nutrients  are a
problem at a particular site.  However, because
baffle  boxes   effectively  remove  suspended
materials,  nutrients  attached to sediments  may
settle out in the box. In general, modeling results
show that baffle boxes are more  effective at
removing  larger  particles and  less  effective at
removing   smaller  particles  (Pandit   and
Gopatakrishnan, 1996).

DESIGN CRITERIA

The  design concept of a sediment [baffle] box is
similar to the design of a three-chamber  water
quality inlet (also known as an oil/grit separator).
Many of the earliest baffle boxes were, in effect,
modified septic tanks (Pandit and Gopatakrishnan
1996).  Typical baffle boxes are 3 to 5 meters  (10 to
15 feet) long, 0.6 meters (2 feet) wider than the
pipe, and 2 to 2.7 meters (6 to 8 feet) high.  Weir
height is usually 1 meter (3 feet). Weirs are usually
set at the same level as the pipe invert to minimize
hydraulic  losses.  Manholes are set over each
chamber to allow easy access  for  cleaning and
maintenance.  Manholes should be located within
15 feet of a paved surface to allow access by
vacuum trucks for box maintenance.

The  design of the baffle box  can be modified to
promote easy  cleaning  and to prevent nutrient
leaching from accumulated biota. Some fiberglass
baffle boxes have been designed to include sliding
grates on both ends.  These gates are closed during

-------
cleaning  to block  flow,  allowing  removal  of
accumulated   sediments  and   trash  without
vacuuming up incoming or residual flows.  These
baffle boxes also have rounded bottoms that cause
accumulated sediment to collect in the middle of
the box, making it easier to vacuum it out (Suntree
Technologies, Inc., 2000).

Baffle boxes can also be designed with aluminum
screens installed below  the inflow pipe but above
the baffles.  In this  design, incoming flow drops
through the screen, trapping trash, yard waste, and
other debris away from the  accumulating water
below. Leaching is reduced because this debris is
kept out of standing water. Therefore, there is less
chance of introducing nutrients into  the outflow.
Trash deflectors  are set at the outflow end of the
box, reducing the chance of carrying garbage out
with excess flow.  Preliminary modeling by the
Florida Institute of Technology indicates that these
screens do not become clogged even under heavy
loads of debris  (unpublished  data  reported by
Suntree Technologies, Inc., 2000).

As flow  accumulates in the first chamber,  it is
forced over a baffle into the  next chamber. Flow
deflectors at  the top of the baffle  reduce the
possibility  of sediment being  carried from one
chamber to the next.  Flow exits through the outlet
pipe (Suntree Technologies, Inc., 2000).

Possible  modifications  to a  standard baffle box
design to accommodate site-specific conditions
include:

       a  two-chamber  box for  small  pipes and
       small drainage areas;

•      a three-chamber box for larger pipes; and

•      two multi-chambered boxes in a series.

These design modifications have  not been  fully
studied.    However,  the  Florida  Institute  of
Technology used hydraulic scale-modeling  to
evaluate box size and shape, along with baffle size
and  placement, on  pollutant removal efficiency
(Pandit and Gopatakrishnan,  1996).  Using three,
four, and five-chambered baffle boxes, this study
evaluated the sediment removal efficiencies of fine
and coarse-grained sediments under several typical
flow rates  and  sediment  concentrations.   The
researchers also evaluated the effect of changing the
depth of the  box and raising the height of the
baffles. The results showed that, in general, adding
more chambers to the box did not increase sediment
removal because each chamber became shorter, and
thus sediment did not settle  out as  efficiently.
Resuspension  of sediments in  the  box was a
consistent  problem   because   incoming  flow
disturbed  sediments  that   had  already settled,
causing them to be resuspended and carried out of
the settlement chamber. The study suggested that
reducing resuspension in the box would increase its
overall  efficiency,   but   this  has  not  been
investigated.

A project to evaluate two baffle boxes in a series is
underway at Sunset Park in Indiatlantic, Brevard
County, Florida (Royal and England, 2000).  This
site  consists  of 23.8  acres of medium-density
residential properties and 0.3  acres of  highway.
One baffle box was installed on a 24-inch pipe in
1992. Flow entered the box at a 90-degree angle
relative to the length  of the box and the weirs,
forcing the flow to turn before entering the second
chamber. This box removed approximately  8,490
pounds of  sediment  per  year  during  the  study
period. A second baffle box was installed upstream
of the original box in February 1998, with the goal
of removing  more  sediment from the system.
However, preliminary results indicate that overall
sediment removal efficiencies have not increased
(see Performance section  below). While  5,639
pounds of sediment per year are currently  being
removed by the upstream box, the downstream box
only removes an additional 715 pounds per year.
This slight increase in overall removal efficiencies
indicates  that the addition of a  second box in a
series is not a major design improvement for this
system.

PERFORMANCE

Baffle  boxes  are an effective  BMP  to remove
sediments from storm water.  Baffle boxes have
been shown  to  remove  from  225  to 22,500
kilograms (500 to 50,000 pounds) of sediment per
month, depending on the sediment load feeding into
the baffle  box.   However,  pollutant removal

-------
efficiencies  (e.g., the percentage of  pollutants
removed by  the BMP) depend on factors such as
land use, drainage basin area, soil types, storm
water velocities through the box, and the frequency
and thoroughness of box cleaning. Limited  data
exists on the pollutant removal efficiencies of baffle
boxes.    Only one  laboratory  and  one field
evaluation are  complete,  while several more field
tests are scheduled for the future. Results to date
are discussed below.

Sediment  accumulation  in baffle boxes varies
greatly depending on the season and the amount and
intensity of rainfall events. For example, Brevard
County, Florida, monitored baffle boxes in  the
communities of Indiatlantic and Micco between
1992 and 1994 (Royal and Vanderbleek, 1994).  In
a  one  month  period between  August  21  and
September 22, 1992, the Indiatlantic baffle box
removed 2,040  kilograms (4,500  pounds)  of
sediment. This time of year (the summer season) is
characterized by  high  intensity, short duration
storms.  However, in contrast, over a four-month
period from September 1992 through January 1993
(during the winter season of lower intensity, longer
duration  storms),  the box removed only 1,815
kilograms (4,000 pounds) of sediment.

Monitoring of the baffle boxes included both water
column  and sediment samples.  Measuring  the
concentration of contaminants in samples at both
the inlet and outlet of the baffle box showed that the
concentration of contaminants was reduced from
the inflow to the outflow of the Indiatlantic box (see
Table 1). Analysis of this site indicated removal
rates of 71 percent Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
and 38 percent phosphorous.  Analysis of BOD
                       removal on three dates showed an average of 39
                       percent removals for two dates, but a 25 percent
                       increase in BOD from inlet to outlet on a third date
                       (Royal and Vanderbleek,  1994).

                       Results from the Micco site baffle box were even
                       more  inconsistent,  showing  an  increase  in
                       concentrations of some contaminants through the
                       box. The researchers suggest that these increases
                       may be  due to  inadequate  cleaning  and the
                       resuspension of accumulated contaminants.

                       Analysis of the sediments from the boxes, found
                       that larger particles (primarily coarse, large-grained
                       sand) were trapped in the first chamber of the baffle
                       box, while finer particles (primarily fine organic
                       and metals-rich sediments) settled out in subsequent
                       chambers  (Vanderbleek  and Royal,   1994).   In
                       assessing  these  data  along  with  removal
                       efficiencies,   the  researchers  concluded   that
                       resuspension of sediments from the second and/or
                       third chambers of the box could increase organic
                       materials and metals in the  outflow from the box,
                       especially if the box had not been cleaned recently.

                       A  scale model  test at the Florida  Institute of
                       Technology indicated that baffle boxes can remove
                       up  to 90  percent of coarse sediments  at pipe
                       velocities of 183 centimeters per second (6 feet per
                       second).  Removal of smaller fly  ash  particles is
                       roughly 28 percent at the same velocities (Pandit
                       and Gopatakrishnan, 1996).  The removal rate for
                       coarse  sediments remained constant  even as
                       sediment concentrations increased from 50 mg/L to
                       1000  mg/L.  In  contrast,  removal  efficiencies
                       increased  for  finer  sediments  as  sediment
                       concentrations increased. This study also showed
     TABLE 1 POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, INDIATLANTIC BAFFLE BOX
 Date
Percent Reduction,
       TSS
Percent Reduction,
Total Phosphorous
Percent Reduction, BODS
10/6/93
11/23/93
1/12/94
2/17/94
Total
89.8
79.2
57.1
56.4
70.6
87.6
67.4
-3.0
0.0
38.7
46.0
31.8
No Data
-25.0
17.6
 Source: Modified from Royal and Vanderbleek, 1994.

-------
that  an increase in the inflow  rate decreased
removal  efficiencies.   For  coarser  sediments,
removal efficiencies declined slightly as the inflow
rate  increased,  while  removal  rates  for  finer
sediments decreased significantly as inflow rates
increased. Thus, the pollutant removal efficiency of
a baffle box may   depend on both site-specific
conditions  and the characteristics of individual
runoff events.

More studies are either planned or underway to
assess  baffle  box  performance.   Officials in
Jacksonville,  Florida,  plan  to  monitor  the
performance of a baffle box installed on a 48-inch
pipe as part of the city's Storm Water Master Plan
(City of Jacksonville Department of Public Works,
2000). This baffle box should be installed by early
2001, with performance monitoring beginning soon
thereafter.  The City of Gainesville, Florida,  will
also begin performance monitoring of a baffle box
to gather information as part of their Storm Water
Phase  II  program.   Brevard County  plans to
continue  monitoring the Sunset Park site, where
two baffle boxes were installed in a series (Royal
and England, 2000).

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

The key to the successful performance of a baffle
box  is  regular  maintenance,  including routine
inspection and cleaning. As sediment accumulates
in the  box, the  chance  for  resuspension of
accumulated  material  increases, and  pollutant
removal efficiencies can decline.  Standing water
that  accumulates in the baffle box may become
stagnant, leading to odor problems (England, 1996)
and  problems  with mosquito  breeding.   It is
important to establish a routine schedule to check
the boxes and clean out accumulated sediment.

Boxes may accumulate anywhere from 225 to
22,500 kilograms  (500  to 50,000 pounds) of
material per month (England, 1998b).  The baffle
boxes installed in Florida require monthly cleaning
during the wet  season and cleaning every two to
three months during the  dry season.  However,
maintenance schedules depend on individual site
characteristics, including typical sediment loads, the
size  of the sewershed, flow rates, land use in the
area, and the size of the box. For example, a baffle
box in a small sewershed that does not receive
much runoff will probably not need to be inspected
as frequently as a baffle box serving a larger area.
The   size  of  the  box  may  also impact the
maintenance schedule.  In general, the deeper the
box, the longer it  can function before needing
maintenance.

Baffle boxes  in Brevard  County are cleaned by
vacuum trucks on a regular schedule of two to six
times per year (England, 1998a).   Originally, a
private contractor performed the cleaning, but as the
number of baffle  boxes increased, the  County
determined that it was more cost effective and
efficient  to purchase  a truck and  perform the
maintenance  itself.  Brevard County currently
divides the use of one its vacuum trucks between
pipe cleaning and baffle box clean out.  During the
wet season, the truck is scheduled primarily for
baffle box maintenance;  during  the dry  season,
baffle boxes do not accumulate as much sediment
and the truck is used primarily for pipe maintenance
(England, 1998a).

During  a baffle box  clean out, vacuum  truck
operators access the chambers through manholes set
above each compartment. Boxes cannot be cleaned
out if base flow remains in the inlet pipes. To block
incoming flow, inflatable plugs or sandbags can be
placed in the  inflow  pipe  or in the manhole
upstream.  If the  box is below the  outfall level,
additional plugs will be needed to prevent backflow
(England, 1998b).

Residual  material  from  baffle  boxes  is  not
considered hazardous and, therefore, its disposal is
not problematic. In Brevard County, useable spoil
is dried and used on road projects, while unuseable
material is landfilled (England, 1998b).

COSTS

Installation costs for most precast baffle boxes run
between  $20,000  and $30,000,  depending on
utilities that must be relocated to accommodate the
box   (England,   1996).   Average   costs  are
approximately $22,000  (Bateman, et. al, 1998, and
National   Resources Defense  Council,   1999).
However, costs can be significantly  higher for
individual installations. For example,  pre-design

-------
estimates for installation of a cast-in-place concrete
baffle box for a 48-inch pipe in Jacksonville,
Florida, are approximately $250,000 (Saint John's
Water Management District, 2000).

Because baffle boxes are  usually retrofit  into
existing  storm water sewers,  costs  are often
independent of the size of the drainage area served.
Most retrofit baffle boxes are about the same size,
making capital costs  about  the  same.   Good
examples of this come from two Brevard County
communities.  A baffle box for the Cedar Lane
community, which  serves 0.9 acres, cost $25,027,
while the Riverside baffle box, which serves 161
acres, cost $24,944 (Bateman,  et. al,  1998,  and
National Resources Defense Council, 1999).  The
major  cost  differences  for  drainage  areas of
different sizes usually result from an increase in
maintenance frequency for boxes in larger drainage
areas with increased runoff.

The average clean out cost for a baffle box is $450.
At an average of  1,925 kg/clean  out, this is an
approximate cost of  $0.23 per kg of sediment
removed (England, 1998a).  An average vacuum
truck can clean two baffle boxes per day.

REFERENCES

Other Related Fact Sheets

Catch Basin Cleaning
EPA832-F-99-011
September 1999

Handling and Disposal of Residuals
EPA832-F-99-015
September 1999

Water Quality Inlets
EPA 832-F-99-029
September 1999

Other EPA Fact  Sheets can be  found  at the
following web address:
http://www.epa.gov/owmitnet/mtbfact.htm
1.      "Baffle Boxes Around a Lagoon," 1999.
       Chapter  7  of  Stormwater  Strategies:
       Community Responses to Runoff Pollution,
       National   Resources  Defense  Council.
       Principal Authors: P. Lehner, G. Clarke, D.
       Cameron,  and A. Frank.  Internet site at
       http://www.nrdc.org/nrdcpro/storm/stoinx.
       html, accessed April 2000.

2.      Bateman, M., E. Livingston, and J.  Cox,
       1998.    "Overview  of  Urban  Retrofit
       Opportunities in Florida." Proceedings of
       the  National Conference   on  Retrofit
       Opportunities  for   Water  Resources
       Protection in Urban Environments.

3.      England,   G.,   1996.     "Stormwater
       Retrofitting Techniques for Water Quality
       Benefits."     Internet  site  at  http://
       www.stormwater-resources.com/library.
       htm#BMP's, accessed April 2000.

4.      England, G, 1998a. "BaffleBoxes andlnlet
       Devices for Stormwater BMPs." Internet
       site at http://www.stormwater-resources.
       com/ library.htm#BMP's, accessed April
       2000.

5.      England,  G.,   1998b.   "Maintenance of
       Stormwater Retrofit Projects." Internet site
       at  http://www.stormwater-resources.com/
       library.htm#BMP's, accessed April 2000.

6.      Florida  Department  of Environmental
       Protection, 2000. Eric Livingston, Florida
       Department of Environmental Protection,
       personal  communication  with  Parsons
       Engineering Science, Inc.

7.      City of Gainesville, Florida, Department of
       Public  Works, 2000.   Stewart Pearson,
       Department of Public Works,  personal
       communication with Parsons Engineering
       Science, Inc.

8.      Indian River Lagoon Program, 2000.  R.
       Day, personal  communication with Parsons
       Engineering Science, Inc.

-------
9.      City of Jacksonville Department of Public
       Works, 2000.  J.  Cunningham,  personal
       communication with Parsons Engineering
       Science, Inc.

10.    Pandit, A., and G. Gopatakrishnan, 1996.
       "Physical  Modeling  of  a  Stormwater
       Sediment Removal Box."   Final Report
       submitted to Brevard County, Florida, and
       the National Estuary Program.

11.    Royal,  J.,  and R.D. Vanderbleek, 1994.
       "Stormwater Monitoring Program, Brevard
       County, Florida."  Final Report, Sediment
       Control Project Assessment for Indialantic
       Basin and  Micco Basin, Brevard County,
       Florida.   Prepared for  St.  John's Water
       Management  District  and  Indian River
       Lagoon National Estuary Program.

12.    Royal, J., and G. England, 2000.  "Final
       Report, Indiatlantic Area Baffle Boxes."
       Prepared   for  Florida  Department  of
       Environmental  Protection,   Contract
       WM651.

13.    St. John's  Water Management  District,
       2000. D. Busby, personal communication
       with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.

14.    "Stormwater and the Environment," 2000.
       Internet site at http://www.alachua.fl.us/
       acepd/stormwat/storm w2.htm,  accessed
       April 2000.

15.    Suntree  Technologies,  Inc.,  2000.   H.
       Happel,  personal   communication  with
       Parsons Engineering  Science, Inc.,  and
       internet sites at http://suntreetech.com and
       http://bafflebox.com, accessed May 2000.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Brevard County, Florida
Gordon England
Surface Water Improvements
Department of Public Works
2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Suite A203
Viera, FL 32940
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Eric Livingston
2600 Blairstone Rd.
Tallahassee, FL 32399

City of Gainesville Department of Public Works
Stewart Pearson
P.O. Box 490, Mail Station 58
Gainesville, FL 32602-0490

Indian River Lagoon Program
St. John's River Water Management District
Bob Day
1900 South Harbor City Blvd., Suite 109
Melbourne, FL 32901

City of Jacksonville Department of Public Works
Jeff Cunningham
220 East Bay Street, 8th floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202

St. John's River Water Management District
P.O. Box 1429
Palatka, FL 32178

Suntree Technologies, Inc.
Henry Happel
720 Mullet Rd., Suite H
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

The  mention  of trade names  or  commercial
products does  not  constitute  endorsement  or
recommendation for use by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
          For more information contact:

          Municipal Technology Branch
          US EPA
          1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
          Mail Code 4204M
          Washington, DC 20460
            MTB
1
Excellence in compliance through optimal technical solutions
MUNICIPAL  TECHNOLOGY

-------