3-Year Quality Assurance
Report
Calendar Years 2008,
2009, and 2010
Ambient Air
Monitoring Program
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
EPA-454/R-14-004
April, 2014
3-Year Quality Assurance Report for
Calendar Years 2008,2009, and 2010
PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program
Ambient Air Monitoring Group
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RTP,NC 27711
in
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Foreword
This document is available as a PDF file on the Internet under the Ambient Monitoring Technical
Information Center (AMTIC) Homepage (www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmqa.html). The document can be read
and printed using Adobe Acrobat Reader software, which is freeware that is available from many Internet
sites (including the EPA web site).
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Abstract
This report documents quality assurance activities for PM2.5 environmental data operations for
2008-2010, for those monitors required to adhere to the quality assurance requirements described in
40 CFR 58 Appendix A. The report summarizes the data quality indicators of precision, accuracy,
bias, and completeness.
The criteria pollutant particulate matter (PM) is defined as a broad class of substances that exist as
liquid or solid particles over a wide range of sizes. EPA measures two particle size fractions: those
less than or equal to [a nominal] 10 micrometers and those less than or equal to [a nominal] 2.5
micrometers, hereafter referred to as PMio or PM2.5, respectively. In general, the measurement goal
of the PM2.5 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program is to estimate the concentration, in units of
micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3), of particulates less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers that have
been collected on a 46.2 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter. These concentrations are
compared to the annual and 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). During
2008-2010, the national primary ambient air quality standards for PM2.5 were 15.0 ug/m3 for the
annual mean concentration averaged over 3 years and 35 ug/m3 for the annual 98th percentile
concentration averaged over 3 years.
A quality system for the PM2.5 program was developed in order to achieve the data quality
objectives (DQOs) that were developed for this program. In order to meet these DQOs,
measurement quality objectives were developed for the data quality indicators of precision, bias,
accuracy, and completeness. This report defines the data quality indicators, explains the derivation
of the goals for each indicator, and summarizes the estimates for these indicators in the 2008-2010
timeframe.
This report focuses on monitors that are required to meet the CFR QA requirements. These are
those with monitor type "SLAMS" and, in most cases, monitor types "NCORE" or "TRIBAL".
Data from monitors collecting PM2.5 for other purposes may or may not need to adhere to the QA
requirements and are not summarized in this report except for overall data completeness and
accuracy.
In general, the results show that the monitoring program quality systems, for the most part, are
meeting the measurement quality objectives. From a national standpoint, about 73% of the
samplers operating all three years met the CFR requirement of 75% completeness in all 12 quarters.
This is an improvement from 2005-2007, when only 68% of the samplers operating all three years
met the CFR completeness requirement in all 12 quarters. The average capture rate of all samplers
is 92%, which indicates that the samplers are operating properly. The precision, accuracy, and bias
objectives are being met at 77%, 100%, and 57% of the PQAOs. This is a noted reduction for
precision and bias from the 2005-2007 QA report. Nationwide, the samplers seem to be showing
slightly more imprecision and markedly more negative bias. At this point, the cause for the trend
towards more negative bias is unclear. The cause for the slightly larger imprecision is also unclear,
but it does not appear to be related to the type of separator used to achieve the 2.5 micron cut.
VI
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Contents
Section
Page
Foreword
Abstract
Figures
Tables
List of Abbreviations
Executive Summary
Introduction
Organization of QA Report
Program Overview
PM25 Data Quality Objectives
Data Quality Indicators
Changes in CFR
Assessment of Data Quality Indicators
Data Completeness
Routine PM2 5 Data
Flow Rate Audits
Collocated Precision
Bias - Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data Pairs
PEP Data Completeness
PEP/Routine Sample Completeness
Precision - Collocated Sampling
National Precision Estimates
EPA Region/PQAO Precision
Accuracy - Flow Rate Audits
Bias-Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data s
National Bias Estimates
State/PQAO Bias
Conclusions
IV
v
vii
vii
viii
ix
1
1
2
2
3
5
5
6
6
7
8
9
10
10
11
12
13
13
15
15
Attachments
1. PM2 5 SLAMS and Tribal Data Completeness by Quarter, Year, and 3-Year Period
2. PM2 5 Collocated Precision Completeness at the Site and Primary Quality Assurance
Organization Level and 3-Year Precision Estimate
3. Precision Completeness and 3-Year Precision Summary by Primary Quality Assurance
Organization Level and EPA Region
4. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness of SLAMS and Tribal Monitors with Aggregation by
Primary Quality Assurance Organization and Average Flow Rate % Difference by PQAO
5. PM2 5 Performance Evaluation Program Completeness Aggregated by PQAO and 3-Year
Bias Estimate
6. Additional Data Processing Details
Vll
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Vlll
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Figures
Figure Title Page
2.1 PEP Completeness, national assessment. 8
2.2 National 3-year PM2 5 collocated precision estimates. 10
2.3 National 3-year PM2 5 collocated precision estimate by major method designations. 10
2.4 Mean and 90% confidence intervals of 3-year precision estimates by method 11
designation.
2.5 Flow rate audit data for 2008-2010. 12
2.6 National 3-year PM2 5 bias estimate. 13
2.7 Mean and 95% confidence intervals of 3-year bias estimates by method designation. 14
2.8 National 12-year bias estimates by major method designation. 15
Tables
Table Title Page
2. i 2008-2010 routine PM2 5 data completeness summary for primary samplers. 5
2.2 Flow rate completeness by sampler and PQAO. 6
2.3 2008-2010 PM2 5 collocated precision completeness aggregated by EPA region. 7
2.4 PM2 5 PEP and routine data comparison. 9
2.5 Data completeness 12-year summary. 16
2.6 12-year precision, accuracy, and bias estimates. 16
2.7 Percentage of PQAOs meeting acceptance criteria. 17
IX
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
List of Abbreviations
AQS Air Quality System
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CV coefficient of variation
DQA data quality assessment
DQOs data quality objectives
EDO environmental data operation
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESAT Environmental Services Assistance Team
FEM Federal Equivalent Method
FRM Federal Reference Method
FS field scientist- Performance Evaluation Program
MQAG Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group
MQOs measurement quality objectives
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAMS national air monitoring stations
NERL National Exposure Research Laboratory
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
ORD Office of Research and Development
PE performance evaluation
PEP Performance Evaluation Program
PM2 5 particulate matter < 2.5 micrometers
PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
PQAO primary quality assurance organization
QA quality assurance
QAPP quality assurance project plan
QA/QC quality assurance/quality control
QMP quality management plan
R&P Rupprecht and Patashnick
SLAMS state and local monitoring stations
SOP standard operating procedure
TSA technical systems audit
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Executive Summary
This report documents the quality assurance activities that were undertaken for EPA's PIVfo.s
environmental data operations for the calendar years 2008, 2009 and 2010. The Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 3-year data quality assessment indicates that the ambient
air monitoring network, in general, has operated in a manner so that decisions can be made within
acceptable levels of uncertainty.
In general, the measurement goal of the PM2.5 SLAMS Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program is
to estimate the concentration, in units of micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m ), of particulate matter
less than or equal to [a nominal] 2.5 micrometers (um) that have been collected on a 46.2mm
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter. For the State and Local Air Monitoring Network (SLAMS)
and designated Tribal monitors, the primary goal is to compare the PM2.5 concentrations to the
annual and 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). For 2008-2010, the national
primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for PM2.5 are 15.0 ug/m3 annual arithmetic
mean concentration and 35 ug/m3 98th percentile 24-hour average concentration measured in
ambient air.
The ambient air monitoring network collects measurements to provide an estimate or a
representation of the true ambient air concentration. It is impossible to know with certainty the true
value for any measured quantity or estimate. This is due to the potential for measurement
uncertainty (measure the same thing twice and you will probably get two different answers) and to
population uncertainty (does the measurement here represent the value 4 feet away or does the
measurement today represent the value tomorrow). As a result, we may report an estimate that is
above some important limit (e.g., the level of an air quality standard) when in fact the true value is
below, or we may sometimes report an estimate that is below some important limit when in fact the
true value is above. There is no way around this. Incorrect decisions can and will be made.
To reduce the number of incorrect decisions and estimate their probability of occurrence, we
carefully design monitoring networks and quality systems. By conducting quality control
measurements and periodically evaluating them, we can estimate, in the long run, the proportion of
incorrect decisions made. We emphasize in the long run. A decision based on an individual
measurement or an estimate (such as an annual average) at any individual site may or may not be
correct. We cannot know the "truth" about one particular decision. But as we make many decisions
we will know the percentage of the time that we are making the correct decision. Therefore, we
should not try to defend an individual measurement or an aggregate of measurements from an
individual monitor. Instead, we ensure that the monitoring network has been designed and is being
operated in a manner so that the errors in the decisions are within an acceptable level.
The data quality objectives (DQOs) process, a seven-step planning approach to develop sampling
designs for data collection activities that support decision making, was used to provide a framework
for linking measurement uncertainty, population uncertainly and the decision makers' tolerance for
making a decision error. Once the DQOs were determined, OAQPS developed a quality system to
control and assess completeness, precision, bias, and accuracy in order to ensure an acceptable
percentage of correct decisions. Table 1 summarizes data completeness and estimates of the
primary data quality indicators of precision, accuracy, and bias at a national level. Comments about
XI
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
these tables follow. In addition, Table 2 provides QA summary information at the EPA Region,
State, and primary quality assurance organization (PQAO) level. The data evaluated in this report
were extracted from the Air Quality System (AQS) between March 2012 and May 2013.
Table 1. National 3-year data summary for calendar years 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Data Type
Routine Data (699)
Average Capture Rate
Collocation Precision
Flow Rate Accuracy
Performance Evaluations
Completeness
3-Year
Average
73%*
92%
89%
88%
79%
Acceptance
Criteria
10%
4%/5%
+ 10%
PQAO Meeting
Acceptance
Criteria
77%
100%
57%
3-Year
Estimate
7.9%
0.048%
-8.9%
* 699 sites collected data in the 12 quarters from 2008-2010. The 3-year average completeness information is based on this value.
Completeness - Completeness is the percentage of data collected from the amount that were
expected or required to be collected. For this report, routine data completeness has been assessed
by two methods. The first method is based upon the strictest interpretation of the completeness
requirement in 40 CFR 50, AppNthat a site must collect 75% valid data in every quarter (12
quarters for the 3-year period) for comparison to the NAAQS. As Table 1 indicates, the 3-year
average routine completeness percentage is 73%, a value slightly higher than the percentage of 68%
obtained for the 3 years 2005-2007. The number of sites on which this completeness is based
decreased from 750 in 2005-2007 to 699 in 2008-2010. Of the 699 samplers reporting data in all 3
years, 513 samplers operated at 75% or greater completeness in every quarter, a count very similar
to that reported in 2005-2007, when 510 samplers operated at 75% or greater in every quarter. The
second method of estimating routine data completeness is called average capture and is related to
completeness during actual operation of a sampler (based on the sampler's start date and end date
listed in AQS). The national 3-year average capture rate is 92%, the same as in the previous 3-year
QA report. The high capture rates indicate that once a site is operating, it generally maintains a
high level of completeness.
Completeness for the collocated precision and flow rate accuracy checks are reasonable and very
similar to prior 3-year QA reports. However, a few individual PQAOs need to improve collocated
precision completeness. For the bias assessment (Performance Evaluation Program), data
completeness averaged 79%, continuing a downward trend seen for the past QA reports: a drop of
approximately 2% from 3-year period to 3-year period. The lower completeness rates result in
fewer available samples with which to understand the ongoing trend in bias by method.
xn
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
15
12.5
-, 10
Precision, Accuracy, Bias Assessments
Precision Assessment (Collocated Precision Data)
Precision is the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same
property. The precision data quality objective (DQO) is based on three years of precision data (75%
complete). Therefore, any year or quarter may exceed the 10% precision criteria and still meet the
precision data quality objectives across the three year period. The national precision estimate is
7.9% CV and is based on over 26,000 collocated paired values where both routine and collocated
QA values are > 3 ug/m3. Nearly 1,500 pairs are excluded because they involve low concentrations.
Also, approximately 200 (less
3-Year National Precision Estimates by Method Designation than 1% of the database) pairs of
Coefficient of Variation (CV) and 90% confidence bounds , u i u , , ,
samples had absolute percent
differences greater than 50%,
which can skew the results.
Excluding these large differences
reduces the national estimate from
7.9% to 6.4%; thus, these points
are highly influential. In this
report, though, all precision pairs
are included since the purpose of
this report is to summarize all data
that are listed in AQS as valid.
Figure 1 provides national 3-year
precision estimates for all federal
reference and equivalent methods
for which precision data are
available for 2008-2010.
Numbers above the whiskers are
the number of pairs included in
the estimate. Precision estimates
(the upper whisker) range
between 3% and 11%. Estimates
are below the DQO except for the
Andersen/Thermo sequential
sampler with a VSCC.
o
7.5
5
2.5
1193
O 1218
^ 12133 2834
A ^X O
498
$
156
T-
t
663T
*
961
0
Only cor>cenlrations greater than 3 jig/m3 used
Co W {/} W W O
^ 2 Z Z Z O
§ £ *5 § § >
co > >
(1) CT D"
O) W QJ
co to
io 0- o
CL gj |
<£ ."
Figure 1. Mean and 90% confidence intervals of 3-year precision
estimates by method designation.
Of the 87 PQAOs, only 20 (23%) had precision CVs equal to or greater than the 10% DQO goal.
Compared to the three previous QA Reports, the precision data show a slight increase in the average
CV and a decrease in the number of PQAOs achieving the 10% DQO.
Accuracy Assessment (Quarterly Flow Rate Audit Data)
88% of the samplers received at least 5 out of the 6 required audits, and average completeness for
flow rate audits was 75% or better at all PQAOs. These numbers are consistent with those seen in
Xlll
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
previous 3-year QA Reports.
Percent Difference of the Primary Monitor Flowrate
Audits
(11,644 flow rate audits)
12000
Audits
Figure 2 displays flow rate audits from
the 2008-2010 period. Six high or low
outlier values were removed in order
to provide a better view of the values
within the + 5% design value
acceptance criteria. Of the 11,644
audits performed, 98% of the audits
were within + 4% of the audit standard
and 99% of the audits were within
+ 5% of the 16.67 L/min design flow
rate.
Figure 2. Flow rate audit data for 2008-2010.
Bias Assessment - (Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data)
xiv
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Bias is the systematic or persistent
distortion of a measurement process
that causes errors in one direction.
As with precision, the bias DQO is
based on three years of bias data. At
a national level, the average bias is
estimated at -8.9%. This is
markedly more negative than
the -3% reported in the 2005-2007
QA Report.
There are approximately 15 large
paired differences (slightly more
than 1% of the database) with
absolute percent differences greater
than 50%. Excluding these large
differences has minimal impact on
the national bias estimate.
95% Confidence Intervals for the 3-Year National Bias Estimates
by Method Designation
15
ro
CD
10
5 -
-5
-15 -
-20
23
-|51
-10 -
31
i:
41
283
24
<>
Only concentrations greater than
used
w
co
w
cn
co
8
8
8
o
o
CO
CO
w
o
•6
<
o
E
I
CO
Q.
OS
K
Q.
oS
cr
Figure 3 provides 3-year bias
estimates and 95% confidence
intervals for all federal reference
and equivalent methods for which
bias data is available in 2008-2010.
Almost all of the methods have
shown a marked change in bias,
namely more negative biases in
2008-2010 compared to previous
years. The R&P single and sequential samplers with WINS impactors show the most negative
biases, near -12%. Samplers with the very sharp cut cyclone (VSCC) have the least negative biases.
To date, the cause for the more negative biases is unclear, since all methods in all seasons are
showing this shift in bias.
Figure 3. Mean and 95% confidence intervals of 3-year bias estimates by
method designation.
Summary Table
On the following two pages, Table 2 summarizes the completeness and data quality indicators by
EPA Region for 2008-2010 data. The statistics are presented at the PQAO level. Details of how
the estimates were generated are explained in Section 2 and Attachments 1-6. Data from both
complete and incomplete sites are used to estimate the data quality indicators.
For data completeness, highlighted boxes indicate that the PQAO has an average data completeness
that is less than 75%. For the data quality estimates, highlighted boxes indicate that the PQAO has
a precision estimate that is > 10% or a bias estimate that is > 10% or < -10%.
The intent of this table is to help focus on where improvements to the quality system can be made.
Incomplete data or data exceeding the acceptance criteria decrease one's certainty in a mass
estimate. One should not construe highlighted cells in Table 2 as implying that the data are invalid.
XV
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
The acceptance criteria are simply goals and are not limits by which one would consider the data
unusable.
xvi
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Table 2. 2008-2010 PM2.5 Data Quality Summary
Region State
Routine %
PQAO Comp
Precision %
Comp
CV Bias % Comp Bias%
Bias Outlier
(A)
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
CT
MA
ME
NH
Rl
VT
NJ
NY
PR
VI
DC
DE
MD
PA
PA
PA
VA
WV
AL
FL
GA
KY
MS
NC
NC
SC
TN
IL
IL
IN
Ml
Ml
MN
MN
OH
0251
0660
0635
0762
0907
1119
0764
0768
0889
1124
0350
0294
1002
0021
0851
0861
1127
1150
0013
1328
0437
0584
0703
001
0776
0971
1025
0258
0513
0520
0685
W44
0700
407
" 0012
OH 0151
OH 0220
OH 0229
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Wl
0287
0595
0634
0805
0807
0809
0880
1259
1175
95% 100%
97% 100%
85%
99%
86%
97%
88%
91%
46%
97%
95%
91%
84%
91%
82%
78%
92%
97%
92%
88%
87%
95%
89%
85%
93%
66%
94%
93%
94%
89%
95%
44%
94%
30%
81%
77%
84%
92%
97%
93%
97%
86%
96%
90%
87%
95%
91%
90%
100%
64%
100%
100%
100%
70%
84%
100%
100%
75%
100%
84%
100%
100%
91%
100%
100%
95%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
98%
4%
93%
Omitted*
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
10.5
8.3
8.0
7.6
6.9
4.3
9.5
5.7
7.6
37.0
5.8
9.0
5.0
8.0
11.5
10.5
4.0
5.4
3.2
7.6
9.5
5.2
6.9
12.5
8.2
5.1
8.4
12.3
9.1
5.4
6.0
87.3
5.2
N/A
9.8
4.4
10.3
6.8
4.2
7.2
4.2
4.7
7.9
7.8
13.8
5.2
6.9
83%
100%
71%
100%
72%
100%
96%
79%
71%
7%
93%
96%
88%
87%
71%
100%
88%
88%
92%
100%
88%
79%
92%
67%
83%
71%
96%
75%
100%
100%
100%
13%
79%
7%
100%
87%
87%
100%
100%
100%
87%
67%
20%
60%
100%
96%
96%
-12.4
0.2
-8.8
-9.0
-6.4
-8.1
-15.7
-9.4
-37.1
-29.8
-13.3
-5.2
-10.9
-8.3
-5.0
-3.7
-14.1
-6.4
-9.7
-24.8
-7.6
-10.5
-3.5
-17.4
-14.1
-13.6
-16.1
-3.9
-5.1
-8.1
-13.1
92.2
-13.3
-21.1
-2.2
-4.9
-13.7
-7.0
-1.7
-3.3
-8.6
-16.3
-14.7
-6.8
-5.8
0.8
-1.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* precision calculated only for sites active for 6 or more quarters.
(A) astericks after Bias % indicates bias includes absolute percent difference >50%.
XV11
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Table 2. 2008-2010 PM2.5 Data Quality Summary
Region State
Routine %
PQAO Comp
Precision %
Comp
CV Bias % Comp Bias%
Bias Outlier
(A)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
AR
LA
NM
NM
OK
OK
OK
OK
JX_
IA
IA
IA
KS
MO
NE
NE
CO
CO
MT
ND
SD
UT
WY
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
HI
NV
NV
AK
[D_
ID
OR
0055 96% 100%
1001 94% 80%
0017
93%
0765 83%
0812
* 807
' 905
' 920
1035
0613
0874
1080
96%
92%
31%
94%
92%
98%
95%
95%
0563 91%
0588
0752
0816
0240
750
0730
0782
0973
1113
1188
0053
0643
0864
0865
615
780
0086
0145
0942
0972
577
0481
0226
1138
0015
0511
180
0821
81%
80%
75%
94%
71%
83%
79%
96%
91%
89%
95%
89%
97%
97%
96%
74%
83%
82%
71%
89%
28%
91%
76%
98%
85%
82%
48%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
81%
100%
100%
90%
100%
82%
100%
100%
100%
96%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
86%
90%
100%
85%
Omitted*
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
67%
2.6
8.9
9.5
8.3
8.9
8.8
10.1
4.7
7.4
5.9
8.5
8.5
6.5
3.9
9.7
16.4
7.0
5.5
4.9
17.1
9.4
9.9
8.8
7.6
8.7
18.8
10.3
9.5
13.7
6.1
11.6
11.5
5.4
13.3
N/A
10.4
3.8
7.4
6.0
13.2
6.4
10 WA 1136 76% 91% 6.4
* precision calculated only for sites active for 6 or more quarters.
(A) astericks after Bias % indicates bias includes absolute percent difference >50%.
92% -10.1 *
100% -22.5
100% 4.3 *
83% -12.7 *
88% 1.2 *
27% 3.2
13% -3.5
13% -18.0
58% -7.4
53% -7.1
100% -8.6
38% 2.8
100% -8.9
83% -5.1
93% -10.6
80% -1.9
54% -10.9
27% 0.8 *
79% -4.7
83% 2.1
67% -7.0
79% -0.2
71% -10.4
63% -11.9
87% -8.5
100% -20.3
87% 15.0 *
60% -15.8
None N/A
96% -3.8
100% -10.7
63% -8.3
100% -14.4
None N/A
33% -19.2
100% -2.6
93% -9.2
93% -19.6
96% -12.5
53% -9.6
96% -16.4
50% -14.4
XV111
-------
PM2.5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
1. Introduction
The Quality Assurance (QA) Report is a 3-year evaluation to determine whether or not the PM2.5
monitoring network is providing data of acceptable quality for its primary use: the comparison of
routine ambient air quality data to the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The
Report evaluates adherence to the quality assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58
Appendix A and assesses the data quality indicators of completeness, precision, accuracy, and
bias for the calendar years 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Data used in this report were extracted from the Air Quality System (AQS) between March 2012
and May 2013 for SLAMS, Tribal, and NCore sites reporting PM2.5 data that are collected using
Federal Reference or Federal Equivalent method designation codes.
Most of the data quality indicator evaluations are at the national and the primary quality
assurance organization (PQAO) level of aggregation, with some evaluations occurring at the
method designation and site level.
Organization of QA Report
The report is organized into two main sections:
Section 1: Overview of the PM2.5 monitoring program and the implementation aspects of the
quality system compared to the quality assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58
Appendix A.
Section 2: Results of the data quality assessment and preliminary conclusions.
In addition, five attachments provide more information at the site and PQAO level of
aggregation that could not be explained in any detail in the sections, and a sixth attachment
details the development of the databases used for the assessment.
Program Overview
The criteria pollutant defined as "particulate matter" consists of a broad class of substances that
exist as liquid or solid particles over a wide range of sizes. As part of the ambient air quality
monitoring program, two particle size fractions are measured: those less than or equal to [a
nominal] 10 micrometers (um) in aerodynamic diameter and those less than or equal to [a
nominal] 2.5 um in aerodynamic diameter, hereafter referred to as PMio and PM2.5, respectively.
This report summarizes findings for PM2.5 only.
The background and rationale for the implementation of the PM2.5 ambient air monitoring can be
found in the Federal Register 40 CFR 50 July 18, 1997. In general, the measurement goal of the
PM2.5 network is to estimate the concentration, in units of micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3),
of PM2.5 collected over 24-hour periods.
A major objective for the collection of the data is to compare PM2.5 concentrations to the PM2.5
NAAQS. Prior to December 12, 2012, the PM2.5 NAAQS were 15.0 ug/m3 for annual arithmetic
-------
PM2.5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
mean concentrations and 35 ug/m3 for 24-hour average concentrations; these were the standards
in place during the collection of the data summarized in this report. The PM2.5 NAAQS were
revised December 12, 2012, to a new primary standard of 12 ug/m for the annual arithmetic
mean concentration. The primary standard for the 24-hour average concentrations remains 35
ug/m3.
As described in the following section on Data Quality Objectives (DQOs), OAQPS designed a
quality system based upon the network's primary objective, which was comparison of data to the
NAAQS. For this comparison, State, Tribal, and Local monitoring organizations are required to
sample using a Federal Reference Method (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Method (FEM). The
description of the PM2.5 FRM is included in 40 CFR 50, App. L, published as a final rule in the
Federal Register on July 18, 1997. Since that time, additional FRM and many FEM sampling
methods have been designated, and their descriptions may be found on the AMTIC Website.1 All
PM2.5 sampling sites that provide data for comparison to either the 24-hour or the annual PM2.5
NAAQS for the purpose of addressing attainment and nonattainment decisions must employ
designated FRM or FEM sampling techniques.
PMzs Data Quality Objectives
DQOs are qualitative and quantitative statements derived from the DQO Process that clarify the
monitoring objectives, define the appropriate type of data, and specify the tolerable levels of
potential decision errors that will be used as the basis for establishing the quality and quantity of
data needed to support decisions. The PM2.5 DQOs are based on the desire of the decision
maker(s) to estimate the concentration at a site (be it a 24-hour estimate or a mean) within
acceptable levels of error, especially when concentrations are near the NAAQS.
The DQO Process is an iterative, statistics-based process which allows the decision maker to
balance tolerable decision errors with the costs of increased data certainty (i.e., more precise or
unbiased data, higher sampling frequencies, or larger networks). In order to provide the decision
makers information on the various data quality tradeoffs, the DQO Process often uses power
curves. The 1999-2001 PM2.5 QA Report2 provides a detailed description of the process that was
employed to develop the PM2.5 DQOs.
Data Quality Indicators
Once a DQO is established, the quality of the data must be measured and evaluated to ensure that
it is maintained within the established acceptance criteria. Measurement quality objectives are
designed to evaluate and control various phases (sampling, preparation, analysis) of the
measurement process to ensure that total measurement uncertainty is within the range prescribed
by the DQOs. The quality of data in a database can be summarized in terms of the following
data quality indicators:
Completeness - A measure of the amount of valid data obtained from a measurement system
compared to the amount that was expected to be obtained under correct, normal conditions. Data
1 http: //www. epa. gov/ttn/amtic/pmfrm.html
2 Year Quality Assurance Report for Calendar Years 1999, 2000, and 2001 - The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring
Program http://www.epa.gov/ttnamtil/files/ambient/pm25/qa/qarept9901.pdf.
-------
PM2.5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
completeness requirements are included in the reference methods (40 CFR 50). The
completeness goal for both routine data and QA data was established at 75%.
Precision - A measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same
property usually under prescribed similar conditions. This is the random component of error.
Precision is estimated using collocated instruments. The measurement precision goal was 10%
coefficient of variation (CV) aggregated over a 3-year period for each PQAO.
Bias - The systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in
one direction. Bias will be determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from
the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias is estimated using collocated instruments
that are set up by a group independent of the monitoring organization. This independent
program implementing the audits is called the Performance Evaluation Program (PEP). The
measurement bias goal was +10% aggregated over a 3-year period for each reporting
organization
Comparability - A measure of confidence with which one data set can be compared to another.
Comparability will not be addressed in this document, but it can be assessed by using the bias
information.
Representativeness - A measure of the degree to which data accurately and precisely represent
a characteristic of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, a process condition, or
an environmental condition. Representativeness, which deals mainly with the population
variability indicators (spatial and temporal variability), will not be addressed in this document.
Accuracy - This term has frequently been used to represent closeness to "truth" and includes a
combination of precision and bias error components; the term has been used throughout the CFR.
In this report, however, "accuracy" refers to errors in flow rate only.
The results of the assessments of the data quality indicators—completeness, precision, accuracy
(flow rate) and bias—will be discussed in Section 2.
Changes in CFR
In 2006, revisions were made to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A. The changes took effect in
CY2007; thus, this is the first 3-year report based wholly on data collected after these changes
took effect. The following discussion summarizes the changes that affect PM2.5:
Use of the Term Primary Quality Assurance Organization
With the signing of the Ambient Air Monitoring Regulation by the Administrator on October 17,
2006, the term "Reporting Organization" was replaced with the term "Primary Quality
Assurance Organization (PQAO)" in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A section 3.1. EPA believed that
there had been some confusion over a number of years about how the term "reporting
organization" was used. It appeared that some organizations used the term as it is currently
defined, and some used it to identify itself as the agency reporting data to AQS. Therefore, EPA
believed that the term "reporting organization" had two applications. By adding the term PQAO
-------
PM2.5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
that focuses specifically on QA requirements and leaving the term "reporting organization" for
other uses, EPA can now identify sites that are aggregated for data quality assessment purposes.
Changes in Collocation Requirement
The 2006 regulation (implemented in 2007) reduced the collocation frequency from l-in-6 day to
l-in-12 day sampling. The precision completeness assessments take this reduced frequency into
account.
Changes in PEP Implementation Requirement
The 2006 regulation (implemented in 2007) reduced the PEP audit requirements from 25% of the
sites (4 audits per site) within a PQAO each year to 5 audits for PQAOs with 5 sites or less and 8
audits for PQAOs with more than 5 sites. The bias completeness assessments take this reduced
frequency into account.
Change in Flow Rate Audit Requirements
The 2006 regulation (implemented in 2007) reduced the flow rate audit requirement from
auditing each site 4 times a year (once per quarter) to twice a year (every 6 months). The flow
rate completeness assessments take this reduced frequency into account.
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
2. Assessment of Data Quality Indicators
This section provides an assessment of the data quality indicators of completeness, precision,
accuracy, and bias for the calendar years 2008, 2009, and 2010. All assessments were performed
on data extracted from AQS between March 2012 and May 2013 for SLAMS, Tribal, and NCore
sites reporting PM2.5 data that were operating federal reference or federal equivalent methods.
Data Completeness
This section evaluates the completeness of routine PM2.5 concentration data, quarterly flow rate
audits, quality assurance data used for estimating precision, and quality assurance data used for
estimating bias.
Completeness - Routine PMi.s Data
Table 2-1 provides an estimate of 3-year routine data completeness for sites operating samplers
designated as SLAMS, NCore, or Tribal and which are designated as primary (indicating they
are to be compared to the PM2.5 NAAQS). Attachment 1 provides a listing of completeness at
the site level, and Attachment 6 provides details about the data processing steps to calculate the
values in Table 2-1 and Attachment 1. Compared to values reported for 2005-2007, there are
approximately 50 more samplers reporting data in 2008-2010, 50 fewer samplers reporting data
in all 3 years, and nearly the same number of samplers with all quarters 75% complete. The
percent completeness is higher in 2008-2010 (73%, up from 67%) and the data capture is the
same as in 2005-2007.
Table 2.1. 2008-2010 routine PIVh.s data completeness summary for primary samplers.
Monitor
Type
SLAMS
Tribal
Total
Samplers
Reporting
Data 08-10
978
24
1002
Samplers
Reporting Data
All 3 Years
699
10
709
Samplers with
All Quarters
75% Complete
513
2
515
% Completeness
Samplers 75% Complete
to Samplers Reporting
Data All 3 years
73% (=51 3 7699)
20% (=2 710)
73% (=5 15 7 709)
Data Capture Rate
of Sampler
Reporting Data in
All 3 years
92%
77%
92%
Completeness was assessed by two methods: (1) as it relates to the strictest requirement in the
Code of Federal Regulations for use in comparison to the NAAQS, and (2) by capture rate.
Table 2-1 shows that during some part of the 3-year time period, 1,002 SLAMS, Tribal, or
NCore samplers reported data. However, within the 3-year period, nearly 300 samplers either
started up after the first quarter of 2008 or shut down before the fourth quarter of 2010. Of the
709 samplers that operated all 3 years, 515 or 73% met the CFR completeness criteria of
maintaining 75% completeness in each quarter (12 quarters). Note that nonattainment decisions
can be made with less information than the 75% completeness requirement. Information on
completeness using these exceptions are not generated for this report but are described in design
value reports.
A second method of estimating completeness is called "capture rate." Average capture for a site
is calculated starting from the first data point submitted to AQS and ending at either the end of
CY2010 or the sampling end date for that sampler. As an example, if a sampler started reporting
data midway through a quarter, the completeness estimate would not be based on the number of
-------
PM2.s 3-Year QA Report April 2014
values expected in the full quarter but only the number of values expected from the sampler start
date to the end of the quarter (based on the site's identified sampling frequency). This
completeness estimate is not related to the data requirements for comparison to the NAAQS;
however, it can provide a more technical evaluation of data collection performance and can be
used to show improvement over time. Attachment 1 provides capture rates for each sampler at
quarterly, annual, and 3-year levels of aggregation. The national average capture rate was 92%,
exactly the same rate as for the 3-year period 2005-2007. In general, the data seem to indicate
that once a site was operating, it maintained an acceptable level of completeness for most
quarters. However, the 73% completeness, relative to the CFR requirement, indicates that more
than 25% of the primary PM2.5 monitors do not meet the 75% completeness for 12 consecutive
quarters (3-year period).
Completeness - Flow Rate Audits
As of 2007, monitoring organizations are required to perform and submit flow rate accuracy
audits on all their routine samplers twice a year, with 1 audit every 6 months. Attachments 4a
and 4b present the flow rate completeness information for the 3 years of data collection at the
site level. Attachment 4a is for any monitors designated as POC-1; any flow rate data in AQS
for monitors greater than POC-1 are in Attachment 4b. Table 2-2 summarizes across all POC
values and presents 3-year estimates of flow rate completeness. Attachment 6 provides details
about the data processing steps to calculate the values in Table 2-2 and Attachment 4a and 4b.
Completeness is based on each sampler's start and end date.
Flow rate audits are generally very complete. Only 12% of the routine samplers fail to meet the
75% completeness criteria for the period of operation (between start and end date) for 2008-
2010, and only 5 (6%) of the 89 PQAOs fail to meet the 75% completeness. The 88%
completeness estimate at the sampler level is very similar to the 2005-2007 QA Report where
completeness was 86%. The number of PQAOs meeting completeness has improved from 89%
in 2005-2007 to 94% in 2008-2010.
Table 2.2. Flow rate completeness by sampler and PQAO.
Type
Routine Sampler (all POCs)
PQAOs
Total Number
1085
89
Number < 75%
Complete
133
5
Completeness
88%
94%
Completeness - Collocated Precision
Monitoring organizations are required to collocate 15% of the sites of each method designation
used in their routine monitoring network and to collect a collocated precision sample every 12
days. For Federal Reference Methods, a sampler of the same method is to be used for the
collocated sampler. Prior to calendar year 2007, the collocation frequency was one sample every
6 days.
Table 2-3 provides the 3-year collocated precision completeness information by EPA Region for
the number of sites collocated in 2008-2010. Attachments 2 and 3 provide 3-year site precision
information for each collocated site to show adherence to the sampling frequency requirement.
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
To provide a more equitable estimate of the number of sites required to be collocated for
precision, only sites operating for 6 quarters (18 months) were counted when determining the
number of required collocation sites.
Also, even though similar methods are supposed to be collocated, this requirement was not
enforced in the data reported in Table 2-3 and Attachments 2 and 3. As part of the development
of this QA Report, sites with dissimilar methods were identified and shared with the EPA
Regions with the goal that these sites would change samplers so that similar methods are
collocated in the future.
Table 2.3. 2008-2010 PMz.5 collocated precision completeness aggregated by EPA region (excluding continuous methods).
Region
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Number of Sites1
45
52
82
167
181
66
41
56
104
39
833
# of Required
Collocated Sites2
10
9
14
29
39
13
9
12
26
8
169
# of Collocated
Sites
13
7
17
56
41
17
12
15
25
9
212
Average PQAQ
Completeness3
92%
85%
94%
94%
84%
100%
100%
79%
85%
80%
89 %4
1= Total number of sites operating for at least 6 quarters.
2= Number derived by aggregating number required for each method in each PQAO.
3=Region percent complete is average of percent complete for PQAO in each region, having first averaged across methods within
each PQAO.
4=Total percent complete is average of percent complete for each PQAO, not average of Region percent complete.
The total number of collocated sites (212) indicates that more collocated sites were operated than
required (169). This has been seen in prior reports and might be explained by the fact that the
collocation requirement was initially 25% when the PM2.5 regulation was first promulgated.
Some PQAOs may still be collocating at the higher 25% rate instead of the lower 15% rate as is
currently required. The average percent completeness is less than 100% because some methods
are under-collocated, despite the total number of collocated sites exceeding the required number.
The last column in Table 2-3 provides an estimate of the average collocation completeness of the
PQAOs within each region. Details of the collocation completeness values for each PQAO can
be found in Attachments 2 and 3. The 89% average completeness in the total row was estimated
by averaging the completeness percentages from each PQAO and method (not by Region). From
a national average perspective, the 75% completeness goal has been met. However, 18 out of 88
PQAOs fell short of the 75% completeness goal.
Completeness - Bias - Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and Routine Data Pairs
The bias data completeness estimate is based on data collected from two different organizations,
the Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT) contractors who collect the PEP data, and
the monitoring organizations that collect the routine data. In addition, some PQAOs implement
PEP outside the ESAT contract. Completeness based first upon PEP data completeness and then
upon the completeness of the PEP/routine data bias pairs is discussed below. Figure 2.3
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
represents the 2008-2010 PEP completeness estimates. A complementary 3-year QA report for
the PEP will provide more detailed information on PEP data completeness.
PEP Data Completeness
In 2005 and 2006, the completeness goal of the PEP was to collect data from 25% of each
method designation in a PQAO 4 times per year (once per quarter). In 2007, the audit frequency
changed to 5 audits for PQAOs with less than or equal to 5 monitoring sites and 8 audits for
PQAOs with more than 5 sites. For a national estimate, the number of active sites operating in
each year were 993 for 2008, 995 for 2009, and 990 for 2010 (Figure 2.1), and these numbers
were used for the completeness assessment. Active sites were defined as follows:
• PM2.5 sites identified as SLAMS, PAMS, Tribal, NCore (no monitors designated as
"other"),
• sites using a method designated as FRM or FEM (speciation monitors are not counted
because they are not considered FRM/FEM),
• sites providing at least one value in the year, and
• sites associated with the PQAO for at least 1 day within the calendar year.
PM25 PEP Completeness
I Active Monitoring Sites El Required Audits
I Valid PEP Samples Collected E3 Valid PEP/Routine Sample Pairs
2010
Figure 2.1. PEP completeness, national assessment.
affecting the analysis. In light of these issues, the information provided is
assessment, and provides some assurance that the PEP is providing audits
completeness for most PQAOs.
Sites that were
discontinued in a
particular year
were counted in
this analysis as
active for the
entire year,
possibly causing
an overestimate
in the required
number of audits
for that
particular
PQAO. There
may also be sites
that were
transferred from
one monitoring
organization to
another that
were not
reported to AQS,
also possibly
a reasonable
at reasonable levels of
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
In Figure 2.1, the second column for each year, the number of required audits, is the total number
of audits that should have been performed. This is calculated as the sum of required audits by
PQAO where PQAOs with 5 or fewer active monitoring sites are required to have 5 audits, and
PQAOs with more than 5 monitoring sites are required to have 8 audits, per year. The third
column represents the number of valid PEP audits for each year. Valid audits are considered any
audit in which the PEP measured a valid sample, including samples that were below the 3 ug/m
cut-off value. PEP completeness is very high—92% in 2008, 96% in 2009, and 96% in 2010—
where PEP completeness is defined as the number of valid PEP samples collected (regardless of
concentration) compared to the number of required audits.
PEP/Routine Sample Completeness
For every PEP value, a corresponding valid routine value is needed in order to calculate bias.
The fourth column for each year in Figure 2.1 represents the number of valid PEP/routine pairs.
Completeness of the PEP/routine pairs for the years 2008-2010 was 76%, 82%, and 80%,
respectively, where completeness is defined as the ratio of the number of valid PEP/routine pairs
(regardless of concentration) to the number of required audits.
Table 2.4 presents the completeness estimates of the PEP/routine data pairs and shows the
percentage of data retained as validation and concentration limit restrictions are applied.
Table 2.4. PMi.sPEP and routine data comparison.
Year
2008
2009
2010
Total
Required
Audits
643
668
678
1,989
Valid
PEP
Samples
Collected
592
642
648
1,882
Valid PEP
/Routine
Sample
Pairs
489
546
543
1,578
Final
Pairs
>3
Ug/m3
465
508
507
1,480
% of PEP and Routine Data Retained (Lost)
Valid PEP
Samples
92% (8%)
96% (4%)
96% (4%)
95% (5%)
Valid
PEP/Routine
Pairs
76% (24%)
82% (18%)
80% (20%)
79% (21%)
Pairs > 3
Ug/m3
72% (28%)
76% (24%)
75% (25%)
74% (26%)
As mentioned in the previous section, 5% of the required audits do not have valid PEP samples,
as shown in column 6 of Table 2.4. To estimate bias, valid PEP and routine data must be paired.
Column 7 of Table 2.4 shows that approximately 20% of the required audits do not have valid
PEP/Routine pairs. Five percent is due to no valid PEP sample, and the remaining 16% is due to
no matching valid routine sample, a percentage that is smaller than that observed during 2005-
2007, when 23% was lost. Possible causes for lost valid pairs include:
• the PEP program making visits on a day when the routine monitor was not operating,
• data entry problems in either monitoring program so that routine and PEP samples do not
match (usually problems with sample date or AQS site ID), or
• data invalidation or subsequent loss of data from the routine monitoring program.
To estimate bias, it is also required that both the PEP and routine concentrations be greater than
or equal to 3 ug/m3. Column 8 of Table 2.4 shows that approximately 26% of the required audits
do not have valid PEP/Routine pairs with both concentrations greater than or equal to 3 ug/m3.
That is, an additional 5% of data is lost due to the minimum concentration requirement, a loss
rate consistent with that observed in 2005-2007.
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Attachment 5 provides information at the PQAO level including number of active sites, number
of required PEP audits, and number of reported valid pairs. Of the 87 PQAOs, 28, or
approximately one-third, have fewer than 75% of the required number of valid pairs.
Precision - Collocated Sampling
National Precision Estimates
The collocated precision results are estimated using collocated paired data of the same method
designation when both concentration values are greater than 3 ug/m3. All percent differences
were retained in all calculations, even large percent differences such as those greater than 50%.
Data are included only for monitors
identified as "primary" in AQS that
operated for at least 6 quarters in
2008-2010.
15
National Precision Estimates by Quarter
10 -
O
'en
'o
S> 5
o_
2043
2071
215221112199
2096
2212
0
OOOOOOOOCT>CT>O>a>OOO O
OOOOOOOO-<-'<--<-T-
oooooooooooo
Year and calendar quarter
Only concentrations greater than 3 \iglm3 used
Figure 2.2. National 3-year PIVh.s collocated precision estimates.
15
12
o
'
3 -
R&PSeqWINS
And/Thermo Seq WINS
R&PSeqVSCC
ooooooooppp o
C\|CMCMCMC\ICM
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
3-Year National Precision Estimates by Method Designation
Coefficient of Variation (CV) and 90% confidence bounds
Figure 2.3 illustrates the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the national estimate of
precision for each quarter of each year for the three most commonly used method designations:
the R&P sequential with WINS, the R&P sequential with a VSCC, and the Andersen sequential
with WINS.
The R&P instruments are producing precision results below the 10% goal for all quarters. The
Andersen/Thermo sequential with WINS has 3 quarters with precision estimates at or above the
10% goal.
Figure 2.4 provides 3-year precision estimates for all federal reference and federal equivalent
methods that reported precision data in 2008-2010. For this figure, the center of the diamond is
the national CV estimate, the lower whisker is the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval,
and the upper whisker is the upper bound. Thus the upper whisker in this plot corresponds to the
estimates graphed in Figures
2.2 and 2.3. (Note that the
whiskers may not extend
outside the diamond, which
indicates that the confidence
interval is narrower than the
diameter of the diamond.)
The numbers above the
whiskers indicate the number
of paired collocated values
that were used in the
precision estimates.
In 2005, federal equivalent
method (FEM) designations
were approved for samplers
using the very sharp cut
cyclone (VSCC). The
precision data was evaluated
separately for these
instruments to determine if
there might be any difference
in precision using the VSCC.
The last four methods plotted
(far right) are method
designations using VSCC. In
some cases, a method using a
VSCC has a larger CV and in other cases a smaller CV than the same method using a WINS.
Precision does not appear to vary consistently by type of separator used to achieve the 2.5
micron cut.
EPA Region/PQAO Precision
The DQO for precision is established using 3 years of data at the PQAO level. Attachment 2
10 -
12.5 -
•in
C§ 1U
£
c
•a 7-5^
'o
^ 5-
2.5
-
n -
1193 -^-56
0
1218
Q 12133 ?~"
* 5
2334
$
498
*
•',,-:.,
O
6637
Only concentrations greater than 3 pg/nV used
&
c
^
o
>
£
en
c
0
0
$
I
in
I
0
I
w
W
Q.
o3
tr
S3
g
CD
Method Code
Figure 2.4. Mean and 90% confidence intervals of 3-year precision
estimates by method designation.
11
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
presents 3-year precision estimates for each site within each PQAO and for each PQAO. PQAO
estimates are calculated by weighting the precision estimates from each site by the number of
pairs associated with each site. Attachment 3 presents 3-year precision estimates for each PQAO
in each EPA Region and for each EPA Region. Aggregating to the regional level weighted each
of the PQAOs within each Region equally so that the Regional estimate was not overly
influenced by one or a few PQAOs. To aggregate to the Regional level, the CVs were pooled,
not averaged, which is consistent with the protocol for dealing with statistics of variation. In
these attachments, the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for CV is what is reported, as
per Equation 11 of 40 CFR 58 Appendix A.
The national precision estimate is 7.9 % CV and is based on over 26,000 collocated paired values
where both values are greater than or equal to 3 ug/m3. In calculating this national precision
estimate, only those paired values collected using identical method designations were included,
so as to represent variability only. At the PQAO level, all paired values were used to maximize
the size of the precision database at the PQAO level. Of the 87 PQAOs that collected precision
data, 20 had precision CVs greater than the 10% DQO goal. Four PQAOs reported no precision
data, reported data for monitors that were denoted "Special Purpose," or operated for less than 6
quarters. Therefore, precision estimates were not developed for these 4 PQAOs. Compared to
the three previous QA Reports, the data show a slight increase in the national CV estimate as
well as a slight increase in the number of PQAOs not achieving the 10% DQO, as shown in
Tables 2-6 and 2-7 later in this section.
Accuracy - Flow Rate Audits
Percent Difference of the Primary Monitor Flowrate
Audits
(11,644 flow rate audits)
12000
There are two acceptance criteria
for flow rate: (1) the flow rate
measured by the FRM must be
within 4% of the flow rate
measured by an independent
transfer standard, and (2) the flow
rate measured by the FRM
instrument must be within 5% of
the 16.67 L/min design flow rate.
Because previous assessments
demonstrated consistent acceptable
results for flow rate audits, EPA
reduced the assessments from 4
times per year to 2 times per year.
The accuracy data from the flow
rate audits for 2008-2010 continue
to indicate that the federal reference
method samplers are operating within the acceptance requirements. Figure 2.5 provides a 3-year
summary of the instruments providing flow rate data to AQS. The vertical axis (% difference) is
restricted to show from -20% to +20% to provide a better view of the values within the + 5%
design value acceptance criteria. This eliminates 6 flow rate audits. Of the 11,644 audits
performed, 98% of the audits were within + 4% of the audit standard, and 99% of the audits were
within + 5% of the 16.67 L/min design flow rate. The average percent difference in flow rate
Audits
Figure 2.5. Flow rate audit data for 2008-2010.
12
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
and the percentage of PQAOs meeting the acceptance criteria for flow rate has been nearly
constant for the past QA Reports, as shown in Tables 2-6 and 2-7 later in this section.
Bias- Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data
National Bias Estimates
National bias estimates by quarter - DQO 10%
3 -
-3 -
The bias results are estimated using collocated paired data where one of the instruments is
operated by a State, Local, or Tribal entity and the other is operated by the Performance
Evaluation Program. Both concentrations must be greater than 3 ug/m3 to be included in the
following figures. All percent differences were retained in all calculations, even large percent
differences such as those greater than 50% or less than -50%. Data are included only for
monitors identified as "primary" in AQS.
Figure 2.6 provides 3-year
national bias estimates for
calendar years 2008, 2009, and
2010. Specifically, the bias value
° H denoted by each diamond
represents the national mean bias
estimate for each quarter of each
year, as per Equation 12 in 40
CFR Part 3 8 Appendix A. The
values listed below each quarterly
data point represent the number
of bias pairs from which the bias
estimates were derived. It is
noted that each quarterly bias
estimate consists of pairs from
multiple sampling methodologies,
and trends may therefore be due
to changes in bias, changes in the
mixture of sampling
methodologies, or a combination
of both.
CD
CO
CD
-9 -
-12 -
-15 -
-18
] 2 •;
139
. '1;-;
Only concentrations greater than 3 npAn! used
CT
CO
o
o
CN
CN
CT
CO
O
o
CN
CO
CT
CO
O
O
CN
CT
CO
O
o
CN
CN
CT
I \
o
o
CN
cr I
O> C
O C
O C
CN C"
Year with quarter
CTi
O
o
CN
CT
O
O
CN
CN
CT
O
O
CN
J
CT
O
O
CN
•ti-
er
o
o
CN
Figure 2.6. National 3-year PIVh.s bias estimates.
Figure 2.6 shows that quarterly national bias is between -14% and -4% and that there are several
quarters in which the national bias estimate is below the DQO of-10%. For 2008-2010, the
national estimate of bias is -8.9% and is based on approximately 1,300 paired values. Large
biases, those greater than 50% or less than -50%, play a limited role in the national bias.
Exclusion of these extreme values reduces the data set by approximately 15 values (a little more
than 1% of the database) and results in a national bias estimate of-9.2% for 2008-2010.
13
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
95% Confidence Intervals for the 3-Year National Bias Estimates
by Method Designation
1 O
10
5 •
£^-
« 0 -
CO
-°
co "5 -
03
~ -10 -
-15 -
-20 -
-
<
-51
>
<
fe7 558 ^
jr
X *
<
.269
•11 T
Jy -
X ^
23 ^
X
41 24
> <>
283
i
Onty concerilrations greater than 3 ng/rrr1 used
COWtOCOCOOOOU
zzzzzoooo
1
OC
a:
o
co
CO
Figure 2.7. Mean and 95% confidence intervals of 3-year bias estimates by
method designation.
Figure 2.7 provides mean bias
estimates and 95% confidence
intervals for all federal reference
and equivalent methods
reporting bias data during 2008-
2010. This shows that all biases
are negative and that they vary
greatly by method, from a low
of-12% for R&P single or
sequential samplers with a
WINS to bias close to 0 for the
R&P single sampler with a
VSCC and the Andersen/
Thermo sequential samplers
with a VSCC, although the
confidence intervals for these
methods' bias estimate is wide
due to the small sample size.
Figure 2.7 also shows that the
biases for samplers operating
with a WINS have different
biases than samplers operating
with a VSCC. In fact, this
difference is statistically
significant, with biases for
WINS being more negative than
biases for VSCC.
Figure 2.8 provides further temporal detail for the three most commonly used methods by
showing bias estimates for each quarter from 1999 to 2010. This figure shows that the samplers
with the WINS had fairly stable quarterly biases from early 2000 until approximately the
beginning of 2007 and then bias began to trend downward. For the R&P sequential with a
VSCC, bias seems to have been generally trending down since 2004. Preliminary bias
information suggests the downward trend did not continue into 2011, although that needs to be
confirmed and checked with bias data from 2012.
Currently, the cause for the trend towards more negative biases is unknown. Given that the trend
is being seen in all seasons, for all sampler types with sufficient data, and in all parts of the
country, the underlying cause is not obvious.
14
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
R&PSeqWINS
A And/Thermo Seq WINS
R&P Seq VSCC
Year and calendar quarter
Only concentrations greater than 3 ng/m3 used
Figure 2.8. National 12-year bias estimates by major method designation.
State/PQAO Bias
As with the precision DQO, the bias DQO is established using three years of data aggregated at
the PQAO level. Attachment 5 provides 3-year bias estimates for each PQAO. Of the 87
PQAOs that had valid PEP/routine audit pairs, there were 38 PQAOs that exceeded the + 10%
DQO. Two of these PQAOs had large positive biases and 36 had large negative biases. There
were also 2 PQAOs with no pairs from which bias could be calculated, as shown in Table 2.
Based on the previous QA Reports, the data show a consistent trend in bias towards more
negative values and in the number of PQAOs not achieving the ±10% bias DQO, as shown in
Tables 2-6 and 2-7 later in this section.
Conclusions
In order to provide a better temporal perspective of the PIVb.s quality system, the following three
tables compare completeness, data quality indicators, and percentage of PQAOs meeting DQOs
for all 3-year QA Reports (1999-2001, 2002-2004, 2005-2007, and 2008-2010).
Data Completeness - Table 2-5 indicates that routine data completeness has improved over the
12-year period, and in general the DQOs for completeness for precision, accuracy, and bias
continue to be met at national levels. However, completeness for bias has been slowly but
consistently declining over the 12-year period, a decline that is approaching the 75%
completeness goal.
15
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Table 2.5. Data completeness 12-year summary.
Data Type
Routine Data
Average Capture Rate
Collocation Precision
Flow Rate Accuracy
Performance Evaluations
Completeness
3-Year Average
1999-2001
28%
Not calculated
67%
76%
85%
2002-2004
64%
92%
90%
83%
83%
2005-2007
68%
92%
91%
86%
81%
2008-2010
73%
92%
89%
88%
79%
Data Quality - Tables 2-6 and 2-7 provide assessments of the data from collocated precision,
flow rate, and bias. Table 2-6 shows from a national perspective that flow rate accuracy has
been consistent for all four 3-year reports, precision has been increasing slowly, and bias is
becoming more negative. Table 2-7 presents the number of PQAOs meeting the acceptance
criteria and shows that fewer PQAOs are meeting the precision and bias goals, as expected from
the results presented in Table 2-6. Reasons for this could be attributed to:
• aging equipment and standards
• fewer data quality values, which allows a small number of high values to skew the
precision and bias estimates
To date, it is unclear why bias has declined so rapidly since 2007, since all methods in all
seasons have been similarly declining.
EPA will continue to watch precision and bias results, especially for the PQAOs showing higher
than expected estimates. EPA produces annual precision and bias reports which are posted on
AMTIC.3 The reports are generated from AQS using the AMP 255 report, which can be run
frequently (e.g., quarterly) to track results. EPA will run these reports quarterly to track progress
on the achievement of DQOs.
Table 2.6. 12-year precision, accuracy, and bias estimates.
Data Type
Collocation Precision
Flow Rate Accuracy
Performance Evaluations
Acceptance
Criteria
10%
4%/5%
+ 10%
3-Year Estimates
1999-2001
7.2%
0.2%
-2.0%
2002-2004
6.9%
0.15%
-2.1%
2005-2007
7.6%
0.007%
-3.0%
2008-2010
7.9%
0.048%
-8.9%
1 http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qareport.html
16
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Table 2.7. Percentage of PQAOs meeting acceptance criteria.
Data Type
Collocation Precision
Flow Rate Accuracy
Performance Evaluations
Acceptance
Criteria
10%
4%/5%
+ 10%
% of PQAOs Meeting Criteria
1999-2001
86%
99%
91%
2002-2004
89%
100%
84%
2005-2007
81%
100%
76%
2008-2010
77%
100%
57%
17
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachment 1
2008-2010 PM2.5 SLAMS and Tribal Data Completeness by Quarter, Year,
and 3-Year Period
Notes:
Estimates of quarterly completeness are based on the start date of the site. For example, if a
sampler started on May 1 (31 days from the beginning of the second quarter), its completeness
would be based upon the remaining 61 days in that quarter.
The use of zeros ("0") in a quarter represent quarters when samplers were considered active in
AQS. Quarters with neither a zero nor a value represent quarters where the samplers were not
considered active.
A "Yes" in the field "all Q 75%" either at the annual level or 3-Year level indicates that the
sampler was at least 75% complete for the year of 3-year period.
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor Monitor endl Lastsair(>ling|(iromAQS AMP- MT TRIBAL III EPA
POC 1 begin date date 1 date | 240) MT SLAMS MONITOR 1 MT NCORE 1 MT NON-REG 1 REG
ALABAMA
010030010 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 4
010270001 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
010331002 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
010550010 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 4
010690003 1 1/7/2005 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/07/2005, 4
010730023 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 4
010730023 2 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 4
010732003 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
010732003 2 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
010735002 1 1/3/1999 12/31/2011 12/29/2011 SLAMS 01/03/1999,12/31/2011 4
010735002 2 1/3/1999 12/31/2011 12/29/2011 SLAMS 01/03/1999,12/31/2011 4
010890014 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
010970003 1 7/19/2002 12/29/2012 SLAMS 07/19/2002, 4
01 010007 1 1/1/1999 1/15/2009 1/13/2009 SLAMS 01/01/1999,01/15/2009 4
01 011002 1 1/16/2009 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/16/2009, 4
01 030011 1 8/7/2001 12/29/2012 SLAMS 08/07/2001, 4
01 130001 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
01 170006 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
01 210002 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 4
01 250004 1 10/1/2002 12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/01/2002, 4
01 270002 1 1/1/1999 12/1/2011 11/29/2011 SLAMS 01/01/1999,12/01/2011 4
ALASKA
020200018 1 11/10/1998 6/30/2011 6/26/2011 SLAMS 11/10/1998, 10
020200018 2 11/10/1998 10/10/2008 10/9/2008 SLAMS 11/10/1998, 10
020200018 3 1/1/2009 9/30/2012 PECIALPURPOf 01/01/2012, 10
020900010 1 10/23/1998 12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/23/1998, 10
020900010 2 10/23/1998 12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/23/1998, 10
021100004 1 11/19/1998 3/31/2011 3/28/2011 PECIALPURPOf 11/19/1998,08/20/2009 10
021100004 3 8/21/2009 12/31/2012 SLAMS 08/21/2009, 10
021700008 1 12/19/1998 9/30/2012 SLAMS 12/19/1998,08/10/2011 10
ARIZONA
040011235 1 11/1/1986 7/26/2011 ilBAL MONITORS 11/01/1986, 9
040011235 2 11/1/1986 7/26/2011 3JBAL MONITORS 11/01/1986, 9
040031005 1 1/12/1999 6/26/2012 SLAMS 01/12/1999, 9
040051008 1 1/6/1999 6/26/2012 SLAMS 01/06/1999, 9
040130019 1 6/13/2000 11/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2004, 9
040130019 2 1/1/2004 11/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2004, 9
040130019 3 5/1/2010 11/30/2012 SLAMS 05/01/2010, 9
040131003 1 4/28/2005 1/31/2012 1/31/2012 SLAMS 04/28/2005,01/31/2012 9
040134003 1 1/1/2005 7/1/2012 6/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2005,07/01/2012 9
040137020 1 5/14/2004 9/30/2012 SLAMS 05/14/2004, 05/14/2004, 9
040137020 2 5/14/2004 9/30/2012 SLAMS 05/14/2004, 05/14/2004, 9
040139812 3 5/1/2010 11/30/2012 SLAMS 05/01/2010, 9
040139997 1 1/1/1999 6/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 9
040151000 1 5/1/2000 6/26/2012 3JBAL MONITORS 05/01/2000, 9
040190011 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 9
040191028 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 9
040210001 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2006, 9
040210001 2 1/1/2009 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2009, 9
040213013 1 8/14/2005 12/29/2012 PECIAL PURPOf 01/01/2012, 9
040230004 1 1/6/1999 6/26/2012 SLAMS 01/06/1999, 9
040252002 1 1/1/2008 6/26/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2008, 9
040270004 1 1/1/2008 12/31/2009 12/27/2009 SLAMS 01/01/2008,12/31/2009 9
040278011 1 1/1/2010 6/26/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2010, 9
ARKANSAS
050010011 1 8/10/2001 12/29/2012 SLAMS 08/10/2001, 6
050010011 2 8/10/2001 12/29/2012 SLAMS 08/10/2001, 6
050350005 1 1/1/2005 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2005, 6
050450002 1 4/28/2000 6/30/2012 6/29/2012 SLAMS 04/28/2000,06/30/2012 6
050450002 2 4/28/2000 6/30/2012 6/26/2012 SLAMS 04/28/2000,06/30/2012 6
050510003 1 2/5/2003 12/29/2012 SLAMS 02/05/2003, 6
050670001 1 1/1/2006 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2006, 6
05 070001 1 4/5/1999 6/30/2012 6/29/2012 SLAMS 04/05/1999,06/30/2012 6
05 130002 1 3/30/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 03/30/1999, 6
05 190007 1 1/22/1999 12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/22/1999, 07/01/2010, 6
05 90007 2 1/22/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/22/1999, 6
05 91008 1 4/2/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 04/02/1999, 6
05 10008 2 4/1/1999 3/1/2011 2/20/2011 SLAMS 04/01/1999,03/01/2011 6
05 90006 1 7/1/2002 12/29/2012 SLAMS 07/01/2002, 6
05 30005 1 11 2008 12 26 2012 SLAMS 01/01/2008, 6
CALIFORNIA
060010007 1 12/1/1999 2/28/2011 2/28/2011 SLAMS 12/01/1999,02/28/2011 9
060010009 1 11/1/2007 9/30/2009 9/28/2009 SLAMS 11/01/2007,09/30/2009 9
060010009 3 10/1/2009 12/31/2012 SLAMS 10/01/2009, 9
060011001 1 1/1/1999 9/30/2009 9/28/2009 SLAMS 01/01/1999,09/30/2009 9
060011001 3 10/1/2009 10/31/2010 10/31/2010 SLAMS 10/01/2009,10/31/2010 9
060070002 1 12/19/1998 7/2/2012 7/2/2012 SLAMS 12/19/1998,07/02/2012 9
060090001 1 1/6/1999 6/30/2010 6/25/2010 SLAMS 01/06/1999,06/30/2010 9
060090001 3 6/15/2010 5/31/2012 SLAMS 06/15/2010, 9
060111002 1 12/16/1998 12/29/2012 SLAMS 12/16/1998, 9
060130002 1 1/8/1999 11/30/2012 SLAMS 01/08/1999, 9
060190008 1 1/3/1999 1/31/2012 1/31/2012 SLAMS 01/03/1999,01/31/2012 07/01/2010,01/31/2012 9
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 % 1 Qtr4 %
118 93 60 55 70
118 100 100 97 63
118 94 97 94 93
118 88 97 80 82
118 91 90 90 100
0 99 98 99 100
142 78 87 87 73
0 99 98 97 100
142 70 87 80 67
142 96 100 97 97
142 58 73 47 47
0 98 86 100 99
118 97 93 78 90
118 76 93 92 90
118 100 93 97 97
118 86 93 96 70
118 97 100 94 97
118 100 97 94 60
118 79 90 90 73
118 100 100 93 100
117 94 100 100 87
117 11 47 67 100
117 87 100 100 100
117 67 100 100 87
117 93 80 85 87
117 100 87 87 83
117 0 20 40 73
117 0 27 67 47
143 94 93 87 80
143 94 100 67 100
145 100 100 93 100
145 89 100 100 100
145 87 97 97 97
145 84 100 100 97
117 90 90 93 100
117 92 80 87 100
145 88 87 100 100
119 86 73 73 13
118 96 87 97 100
118 100 93 97 97
143 100 100 100 100
153 100 93 93 87
143 100 100 100 93
143 94 87 100 93
143 94 100 100 100
117 100 100 80 97
117 89 100 67 100
117 100 100 100 100
117 90 93 87 90
0 94 73 87 80
117 96 90 100 83
117 100 100 100 100
117 97 97 94 97
0 97 93 97 97
118 100 90 100 100
118 94 93 87 100
118 95 90 89 100
117 92 87 87 93
117 87 77 90 90
117 81 97 100 97
0 94 100 100 95
0 100 100 100 100
0 100 100 100 93
117 92 100 100 100
117 94 100 100 87
118 94 73 93 80
0 98 100 100 87
118 97 92 99 99
AJMQsl
75%+ |Year°/o
70
90
Y 94
Y 87
Y 93
Y 99
81
Y 99
76
Y 97
56
Y 96
Y 90
Y 88
Y 97
86
Y 97
88
83
Y 98
Y 95
47
Y 97
88
Y 86
Y 89
33
35
Y 89
90
Y 98
Y 97
Y 94
Y 95
Y 93
Y 90
Y 94
62
Y 95
Y 97
Y 100
Y 93
Y 98
Y 94
Y 99
Y 94
89
Y 100
Y 90
84
Y 92
Y 100
Y 96
Y 96
Y 98
Y 94
Y 94
Y 90
Y 86
Y 94
Y 97
Y 100
Y 98
Y 98
Y 95
85
Y 96
Y 97
2009 Completeness
Method | Qtrl % Qtr2 %
118 30 90
118 97 94
118 89 91
118 84 96
118 82 97
0 100 96
142 85 88
0 99 99
142 78 82
142 100 100
142 73 70
145 100 100
118 77 97
118 60
118 74 56
118 97 97
118 94 80
118 100 90
118 90 36
118 96 87
118 100 91
117 88 82
170 99 100
117 97 94
117 100 88
117 88 88
170 0 0
117 97 93
117 93 93
117 94 94
143 86 100
143 94 100
145 100 90
145 100 100
145 97 97
145 100 97
117 100 100
117 93 100
145 100 100
119 43 0
118 93 100
118 100 100
143 100 94
143 100 100
0 100 94
143 100 67
143 73 87
143 100 93
143 100 100
143 94 94
143 100 97
143 100 94
143 100 88
143 97 100
143 96 94
143 100 97
145 100 99
145 81 81
145 88 88
143 88 71
143 83 80
143 93 100
145 100 100
145 97 100
170 0 0
145 97 100
170 0 0
117 100 100
117 100 93
118 94 94
145 93 100
118 96 97
|ill
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
060190008 2 1/6/1999
060195001 1 1/1/1999
060195025 1 1/1/2000
060231002 1 1/1/1999
060250005 1 1/1/1999
060250005 2 1/1/1999
060250007 1 12/15/2003
060251003 1 1/1/1999
060271003 1 9/1/1998
060271003 2 1/1/1999
060271003 3 9/10/2009
0602900 0 1 1/1/1999
0602900 0 3 8/27/2006
0602900 4 1 1/1/1999
0602900 4 2 1/1/1999
0602900 5 1 6/1/1999
0602900 6 1 2/18/2000
060310004 1 1/1/1999
060311004 3 1/1/2010
060333001 1 1/1/1999
060370002 1 1/1/1999
060371002 1 1/1/1999
060371002 3 1/1/2008
060371103 1 1/1/1999
060371103 3 1/1/2008
060371201 1 1/1/1999
060371301 1 1/1/1999
060371302 1 11/2/2008
060371602 1 10/1/2005
060372005 1 1/1/1999
060374002 1 1/1/1999
060374002 2 1/1/1999
060374002 3 1/6/2009
060379033 1 11/1/2001
060392010 3 7/16/2010
060410001 3 10/27/2009
060450006 1 1/1/1999
060450006 3 12/31/2008
060452001 1 12/1/2008
060452002 3 9/15/2009
060470003 3 10/19/2009
060472510 1 4/1/1999
060531003 1 1/1/2000
060531003 3 1/1/2010
060570005 1 12/30/1998
060571001 1 3/31/1999
060571001 2 5/12/1999
060590007 1 9/1/2001
060590007 3 1/1/2008
060592022 1 6/15/1999
060610006 1 12/31/1998
060631006 1 3/26/1999
060631009 1 3/21/2000
060631009 7 1/18/2007
060650009 1 8/12/2010
060650009 2 8/12/2010
060651003 1 1/1/1999
060652002 1 1/1/1999
060652002 2 1/1/1999
060655001 1 10/10/1999
060658001 1 1/1/1999
060658001 2 1/1/1999
060658001 3 1/1/2008
060658005 1 10/25/2005
060658005 3 1/1/2008
060670006 1 1/3/1999
060670006 2 2/17/1999
060670010 1 12/13/1998
060674001 1 2/2/1999
060690002 1 1/6/2007
060690002 3 1/1/2010
060710025 1 1/1/1999
060710025 2 1/1/1999
060710306 1 1/1/2000
060710306 2 1/1/2000
060712002 1 1/1/1999
060719004 1 1/1/1999
060730001 1 1/1/1999
060730003 1 1/1/1999
060730006 2 1/1/1999
060731002 1 1/1/1999
060731002 3 6/20/2008
060731002 4 4/8/2010
060731008 3 7/1/2009
060731010 1 7/14/2005
060731011 1 5/26/2004
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
060731011 2 5/26/2004
060731201 1 8/19/2005
060750005 1 1/1/1999
060750005 3 10/1/2009
060771002 1 1/3/1999
060771002 3 5/11/2010
060772010 3 11/16/2010
060792004 1 7/1/2009
060792006 1 9/21/2005
060792007 1 8/1/2010
060798001 2 1/1/1999
060798001 3 6/1/2009
060811001 1 1/1/1999
060811001 3 10/1/2009
060830011 1 5/1/2002
060830011 3 6/25/2010
060831008 1 4/12/1999
060831008 3 5/23/2010
060850002 1 3/1/2007
060850002 3 10/31/2009
060850005 1 10/5/2002
060870007 1 1/1/1999
060870007 3 1/1/2010
060890004 1 12/19/1998
060932001 1 5/1/2005
060950004 1 1/1/1999
060970003 1 1/1/1999
060970003 3 10/23/2009
060990005 1 1/3/1999
060990005 3 5/1/2010
060990006 3 11/19/2008
061010003 1 12/19/1998
061030006 3 1/1/2009
061072002 1 1/3/1999
061 10007 1 1/1/1999
061 10007 2 1/1/1999
061 12002 1 1/1/1999
061 13001 1 1/1/1999
061 31003 1 1/9/1999
COLORADO
080010006 1 1/1/2001
080010006 2 1/1/2001
080050005 1 3/10/1999
080130003 1 1/22/1999
080130012 1 1/30/1999
080310002 1 1/1/1999
080310002 2 9/22/2001
080310025 1 10/1/2007
080390001 1 5/28/1999
080410011 1 1/19/1999
080677001 1 6/17/2009
080677001 2 6/18/2009
080677003 1 6/17/2009
080690009 1 7/10/1999
080770017 1 11/4/2002
081010012 1 2/20/1999
081010015 1 6/24/2009
081230006 1 2/13/1999
CONNECTICUT
090010010 1 1/1/1999
090013005 1 3/16/2000
090019003 1 1/1/1999
090031003 1 1/1/1999
090032006 1 1/1/2008
090090027 1 1/24/2004
090090027 2 1/1/2004
090091123 1 1/1/1999
090092008 1 3/25/2003
090092123 1 1/1/1999
090092123 2 1/1/1999
090113002 1 1/1/1999
DELAW RE
00010002 1 1/1/1999
00010003 1 1/1/1999
00031003 1 1/1/1999
00031007 1 1/1/1999
00031012 1 12/15/1999
00032004 2 1/1/1999
00032004 3 6/15/2000
00051002 1 1/1/1999
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
10010041 1 1/1/1999
10010041 2 1/1/1999
10010042 1 1/1/1999
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
10010043 1 1/1/1999
10010043 4 1/1/1999
FLORID
20010023 1 1/6/1999
20010023 2 1/6/1999
20010024 1 9/5/1999
20051004 1 5/4/2001
20111002 1 1/1/1999
20111002 2 1/1/1999
20112003 1 7/9/2010
20112004 1 4/1/1999
20113002 1 4/3/1999
20115005 1 9/30/2009
20170005 1 2/5/1999
20170005 2 2/5/1999
20310098 1 6/1/1999
20310099 1 6/1/1999
20310099 2 6/1/1999
20330004 1 1/3/1999
20330004 2 1/3/1999
20570030 1 1/1/1999
20570030 2 1/1/1999
20573002 1 1/1/2004
20573002 2 1/26/2010
20710005 1 1/1/1999
20710005 2 1/21/1999
20730012 1 1/1/1999
20730012 2 10/1/2004
20814012 1 1/1/1999
20860033 1 5/4/2005
20861016 1 2/4/1999
20861016 2 2/4/1999
20866001 1 1/27/1999
20951004 1 1/1/1999
20952002 1 1/1/1999
20952002 2 1/1/1999
20990009 1 12/4/1999
20990009 2 12/17/2008
20992005 1 6/23/2001
20992005 2 6/23/2001
21030018 1 1/1/1999
21030018 2 1/1/1999
21031009 1 9/12/2003
21056006 1 1/1/1999
21056006 2 1/1/1999
21111002 1 1/3/1999
21111002 2 1/3/1999
21150013 1 1/3/1999
21150013 2 1/3/1999
21171002 1 1/7/1999
21171002 2 1/7/1999
21275002 1 1/4/1999
GEORGIA
30210007 1 2/2/1999
30210007 2 2/2/1999
30210012 1 2/11/1999
30510017 1 1/21/1999
30590002 1 2/12/2005
30670003 1 2/7/1999
30670004 1 2/5/2003
30890002 2 10/3/2008
30892001 1 1/1/1999
30950007 1 2/2/1999
31150003 1 3/10/2009
31150005 1 1/18/1999
31210032 2 1/1/1999
31210039 1 1/21/1999
31210048 1 9/26/2006
31270006 1 8/31/1999
31350002 1 1/1/2000
31390003 1 2/14/1999
31530001 1 7/5/2000
31850003 1 1/1/2000
32150001 1 3/4/1999
32150008 1 6/2/2003
32150011 1 1/21/1999
32230003 1 1/24/1999
32450005 1 1/21/1999
32450005 2 1/1/1999
32450091 1 2/8/1999
32950002 1 1/1/2000
33030001 1 1/30/1999
33190001 1 1/1/1999
HAWAII
50030010 1 1/1/1999
50031001 1 1/1/1999
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor Monitor endl Lastsair(>ling|(iromAQS AMP- MT TRIBAL III EPA
POC 1 begin date date 1 date | 240) MT SLAMS MONITOR 1 MT NCORE 1 MT NON-REG 1 REG
50031001 3 4/1/2009 9/30/2012 SLAMS 04/01/2009, 9
50031004 1 10/1/1999 3/31/2009 3/26/2009 SLAMS 10/01/1999,03/31/2009 9
50031004 2 1/1/2009 9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2009, 9
50032004 1 1/1/1999 12/31/2010 12/28/2010 SLAMS 01/01/1999,12/31/2010 9
50032004 4 1/10/2009 9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/10/2009, 9
50090006 1 1/28/1999 11/30/2008 11/26/2008 SLAMS 01/28/1999,11/30/2008 9
50090006 2 12/1/2008 9/30/2012 SLAMS 12/01/2008, 9
[DAHO
60010010 1 9/26/2006 9/30/2012 R.OPOSED NCOI 01/01/2011, 07/01/2010, 10
60010010 3 7/2/2009 12/30/2010 12/30/2010 DN-REGULATORY 07/01/2010,12/30/207/02/2009,12/30/20 10
60010011 1 11/1/1998 12/1/2009 11/30/2009 SLAMS 11/01/1998,12/01/2009 10
60050020 1 4/3/2008 9/1/2010 8/30/2010 3JBAL MONITORS 04/03/2008,09/01/2010 10
60050020 2 11/15/2001 12/29/2012 3JBAL MONITORS 04/06/2008,08/31/2010 10
60050020 3 11/15/2001 1/31/2013 ilBAL MONITORS 04/15/2010, 10
60270002 1 6/20/2008 9/30/2012 SLAMS 06/20/2008, 10
60270004 1 11/1/1998 6/17/2008 6/17/2008 SLAMS 01/01/2001,06/17/2008 10
60410001 1 12/5/2004 9/30/2012 SLAMS 12/05/2004, 10
60590004 1 2/7/2003 9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007,05/28/2012 05/29/2012,06/22/20 10
60590004 3 9/1/2009 10/31/2012 DN-REGULATOI 01/01/2011, 09/01/2009,01/01/20 10
60770011 3 9/1/2009 1/1/2010 12/31/2009 3JBAL MONITORS 09/01/2009,01/01/2010 10
60790017 2 12/2/2007 12/29/2012 SLAMS 12/02/2007, 10
60790017 4 1/1/2010 10/31/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2010, 10
[LLINO
70010007 1 4/1/2007 12/29/2012 SLAMS 04/01/2007, 5
70190004 1 1/1/2000 4/2/2010 4/2/2010 SLAMS 01/01/2000,04/02/2010 5
701 1001 1 1/1/1999 12/26/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 5
703 0022 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
703 00 0 1 1/1/1999 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 SLAMS 01/01/1999,12/31/2010 5
703 00 2 1 1/1/1998 12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
703 00 7 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
703 00 6 1 1/1/2000 12/23/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
703 10 6 1 1/1/1999 12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
703 2001 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
703 3103 1 1/1/2004 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2004, 5
703 3301 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
703 4007 1 1/1/2001 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2001, 5
703 4201 1 1/1/1998 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 07/01/2010, 5
703 6005 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
70434002 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
70650002 1 51 2005 11 17 2012 SLAMS 05/01/2005, 5
70890003 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
70890007 1 1/1/2005 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007, 5
70971007 1 1/1/2000 12/31/2010 12/28/2010 SLAMS 01/01/2000,12/31/2010 5
70990007 1 1/1/2000 12/31/2010 12/25/2010 SLAMS 01/01/2000,12/31/2010 5
7 110001 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
7 132003 1 1/1/2005 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2005, 5
'
7 191007 1 1/1/1999 12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
7 192009 1 1/1/2000 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
7 193007 1 11 1999 12 29 2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
7 570001 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
7 613002 1 1/1/2001 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2001, 5
7 630010 1 1/1/1999 12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
7 634001 1 1/1/2000 12/31/2010 2/28/2010 SLAMS 01/01/2000,12/31/2010 5
7 670012 1 1/1/1999 2/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
7 971002 1 1/1/1999 2/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
72010013 1 1/1/2005 2/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2005, 5
[NDIAN
80030004 1 1/1/1999 1/31/2013 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
80190006 1 6/26/2003 1/31/2013 SLAMS 06/26/2003, 5
80350006 1 10/15/1999 1/31/2013 SLAMS 10/15/1999, 5
80370004 1 1/29/2006 12/31/2008 12/29/2008 SLAMS 01/29/2006,12/31/2008 5
80370005 1 1/29/2006 12/31/2008 12/29/2008 SLAMS 01/29/2006,12/31/2008 5
80372001 1 1/1/2000 1/31/2013 SLAMS 01/01/2000, 5
80390008 1 1/1/2008 1/31/2013 SLAMS 01/01/2008, 5
80431004 1 1/1/1999 1/31/2013 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
80431004 2 1/1/1999 1/28/2013 SLAMS 01/01/1999, 5
80650003 1 9/26/2000 1/31/2013 SLAMS 09/26/2000, 5
80670003 1 6/11/1999 1/31/2012 1/31/2012 SLAMS 06/11/1999,01/31/2012 5
80830004 1 1/1/2000 12/31/2011 12/29/2011 SLAMS 01/01/2000,12/31/2011 5
80890006 1 1/27/1999 1/31/201 SLAMS 01/27/1999, 5
80890022 1 3/4/1999 1/31/201 SLAMS 03/04/1999, 5
80890026 1 2/12/2000 1/31/201 SLAMS 02/12/2000, 5
80890027 1 2/18/2000 12/31/2011 12/29/20 SLAMS 02/18/2000,12/31/2011 5
80890031 1 7/1/2005 1/31/201 SLAMS 07/01/2005, 5
80892004 1 2/11/1999 1/31/201 SLAMS 02/11/1999, 5
80892010 1 1/27/1999 12/29/20 SLAMS 01/27/1999, 5
80910011 1 12/17/1999 1/31/201 SLAMS 12/17/1999, 5
80950009 1 3/19/1999 7/13/2010 7/10/2010 SLAMS 03/19/1999,07/13/2010 5
80950011 1 7/12/2010 1/31/2013 SLAMS 07/12/2010, 5
80970066 1 1/24/1999 2/17/2009 2/15/2009 SLAMS 01/24/1999,02/17/2009 5
80970078 3 1/4/2010 1/12/2012 INDEX SITE 01/01/2011, 01/01/2011, 5
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 % 1 Qtr4 %
120 100 100 100 93
120 94 100 100 93
120 89 80 100 90
170 0 0 0 33
118 86 100 100 100
118 57 87 94 97
117 0 90 87 87
117 0 87 80 73
118 0 33 94 100
118 43 91
118 43 83 87 83
118 75 69 87 73
118 100 72 89 100
120 86 100 100 100
119 100 93 93 9
119 100 100 100 8
120 92 100 93 8
120 80 97 83 8
120 88 79 98 9
120 77 97 97 83
120 97 97 94 100
120 97 97 100 97
120 88 93 93 97
120 68 97 90 97
120 97 100 97 97
120 96 100 88 93
120 87 100 100 93
120 50 93 100 70
117 100 93 93 100
1
120 100 93 100 100
117 100 93 87 93
119 100 100 100 100
120 57 97 100 97
120 87 100 100 77
117 97 90 97 93
120 77 80 80 87
120 83 87 87 93
119 94 93 100 93
117 89 100 93 93
0 94 100 67 100
120 66 100 97 97
117 88 87 94 100
120 100 100 100 100
120 93 100 100 97
145 65 93 100 93
145 84 92 98 92
145 73 100 100 97
118 75 73 87 90
118 78 83 94 100
145 46 72 72 83
0 79 97 94 93
0 90 87 83 100
0 89 67 87 93
0 79 97 93 93
0 94 100 69 73
118 100 93 100 93
145 81 83 78 93
18 97 83 90 90
18 78 87 100 90
18 94 83 78 97
18 59 87 84 77
18 97 97 90 97
0 93 63 84 100
145 91 87 71 97
145 100 88 98 95
145 85 87 85 100
AJMQsl
75%+ |Year°/o
Y 98
Y 97
Y 90
8
Y 97
84
66
60
57
67
74
76
90
Y 97
Y 95
Y 97
Y 93
Y 86
Y 89
Y 88
Y 97
Y 98
Y 93
88
Y 98
Y 94
Y 95
78
Y 97
Y 98
Y 93
Y 100
88
Y 91
Y 94
Y 97
Y 81
Y 88
Y 95
Y 94
90
90
Y 92
Y 100
Y 98
88
Y 92
93
82
Y 89
68
Y 91
Y 90
84
Y 91
84
Y 97
Y 84
Y 90
Y 89
Y 88
77
Y 95
85
86
Y 95
Y 89
2009 Completeness
Method | Qtrl % Qtr2 %
170 0 99
120 100
170 95 100
120 0 100
170 96 99
170 96 100
118 100 97
170 0 0
118 87 94
117 97 94
117 92 100
118 100 100
0 90 90
0 63 94
170 0 0
170 0 0
118 100 100
116 88 94
116 94 100
119 94 100
120 92 93
120 78 90
120 83 99
120 79 93
120 96 100
120 92 99
120 93 100
120 75 91
120 97 97
120 94 100
120 86 100
120 75 90
117 92 100
120 100 100
117 88 100
119 88 93
120 93 100
120 100 97
117 100 90
117 93 100
120 87 96
116 100 100
116 100 97
119 94 93
117 85 87
116 94 87
116 90 97
117 93 100
120 100 100
120 90 87
145 97 90
145 98 89
145 94 90
145 100 69
145 87 97
145 90 93
145 94 100
145 96 78
145 91 91
0 93 100
145 84 100
0 100 88
0 96 97
0 93 100
0 84 52
0 41 0
145 87 97
145 97 90
145 100 100
145 100
LlHQs
Qtr3 % Qtr4 % 1 75%+ Year %
99 99 74
100
98 100 Y 98
100 93 73
97 100 Y 98
97 99 Y 98
97 90 Y 96
95 29 31
17 27 56
97 97 Y 96
100 100 Y 98
100 100 Y 100
77 87 Y 86
87 80 81
26 96 31
0 98 25
93 100 Y 98
93 73 87
100 100 Y 99
100 100 Y 99
87 100 Y 93
97 100 Y 91
100 96 Y 95
93 87 Y 88
100 93 Y 97
98 96 Y 96
97 97 Y 97
97 87 Y 88
100 100 Y 98
100 97 Y 98
100 100 Y 97
97 97 Y 90
100 100 Y 98
93 87 Y 93
100 100 Y 100
100 100 Y 97
93 100 Y 94
100 87 Y 95
97 90 Y 96
100 93 Y 96
93 100 Y 97
86 90 Y 90
100 93 Y 98
100 100 Y 99
87 100 Y 94
87 93 Y 88
87 87 Y 89
100 100 Y 97
97 87 Y 94
93 93 Y 97
97 87 Y 90
100 90 Y 94
99 96 Y 96
100 100 Y 96
90 87 86
100 100 Y 96
90 97 Y 93
100 93 Y 97
93 85 Y 88
87 94 Y 91
100 100 Y 98
100 93 Y 94
100 81 Y 92
100 100 Y 98
87 94 Y 93
97 94 82
100 100 Y 97
100 97 Y 95
90 100 Y 94
100 87 Y 97
100
86
2010 Completeness
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 %
170 99 98 98
170 98 75 95
120 87 87 81
170 100 96 95
170 95 92 94
118 100 100 100
170 36 89 100
117 100 100 63
117 100 93 68
170 0 99 99
118 100 100 100
145 70 0 0
145 80 100 100
170 82 96 90
0
118 100 87 100
181 77 94 57
116 93 93 93
116 100 100
119 80 87 100
120 100 100 100
120 90 100 100
120 100 98 93
120 63 100 100
120 90 97 97
120 99 99 87
120 97 90 97
120 80 87 81
120 97 97 100
120 100 100 100
120 97 100 100
120 87 87 93
117 93 100 94
119 100 100 100
120 100 100 100
117 100 87 100
119 100 100 100
120 97 97 94
120 100 90 87
117 87 100 100
120 94 96 95
116 87 100 93
116 83 80 100
119 93 87 88
116 87 93 88
116 90 93 100
117 93 100 90
120 93 100 94
120 73 90 84
145 100 100 100
145 88 99 97
145 97 97 84
145 83 97 100
145 100 100 100
145 87 90 97
145 100 93 93
145 100 73 100
145 90 90 97
145 83 100 100
145 100 93 93
145 97 93 84
145 100 100 97
145 97 100 100
145 97 93 93
145 100 100 97
145 97 90 91
145 100 97 97
145 97 100 80
145 0 0 89
181 98 84 40
™*|
Qtr4% 75%+ |Year%
99 Y 99
79 Y 87
100 Y 89
99 Y 98
86 Y 92
100 Y 100
99 81
88
93 89
99 75
93 Y 98
37 27
97 Y 94
99 Y 92
0
87 Y 93
92 80
93 Y 93
100
100 Y 92
100 Y 100
94 Y 96
97 Y 97
94 89
94 Y 94
91 Y 94
97 Y 95
94 Y 85
100 Y 98
97 Y 99
94 Y 98
90 Y 89
100 Y 97
93 Y 98
100 Y 100
100 Y 97
100 Y 100
85 Y 93
94 Y 93
97 Y 96
80 83
83 Y 92
93 Y 93
90 Y 88
93 Y 90
93 Y 90
87 Y 93
97 Y 95
93 Y 95
100 87
100 Y 100
93 Y 94
87 Y 91
94 Y 93
100 Y 100
93 Y 92
100 Y 97
90 91
90 Y 92
94 Y 94
90 Y 94
93 Y 92
97 Y 98
97 Y 98
75 Y 90
97 Y 98
94 Y 93
94 Y 97
96
100 47
99 80
AllQtrs 1 Avg.
75%+ | Capture
87
99
93
86
98
90
66
Y 98
56
70
83
82
75
85
67
62
84
62
13
94
80
92
98
Y 96
Y 95
Y 91
Y 94
88
Y 96
Y 96
Y 95
87
Y 98
Y 97
Y 97
86
Y 97
Y
Y 99
Y 96
Y 98
92
Y 93
Y 95
92
Y 88
Y 93
Y
Y 93
88
90
93
Y 94
Y 97
92
94
Y 94
93
82
89
82
Y 96
Y 92
93
90
89
Y 96
Y 91
Y 91
Y 95
Y 93
83
71
91
92
96
47
95
80
Page 5
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
80970081 1 1/22/1999
80970081 2 2/11/1999
80970083 1 1/22/1999
80970084 1 2/15/2009
81050003 1 4/1/2009
81270024 1 1/27/1999
81410014 1 11/20/1999
81410015 2 6/1/2006
81470009 1 21 2000
81570008 2 10/1/2002
81630006 1 4/15/1999
81630006 2 4/15/1999
81630012 1 4/15/1999
81630016 1 6/5/1999
81630020 1 3/10/2009
81630020 2 3/10/2009
81630021 1 7/8/2009
81670018 1 3/19/1999
81670023 1 12/6/1999
81830003 1 4/7/2010
[OWA
90130008 1 1/15/1999
90130009 1 1/1/2009
191130037 1 1/15/1999
191130040 1 1/15/2008
191370002 1 5/30/2002
191390015 1 41 2000
191530030 1 1/1/2002
191532510 1 2/1/1999
191630015 1 1/27/1999
191630019 1 1/1/2005
191770006 1 11/8/2004
KANSAS
200910007 1 1/21/1999
200910010 1 1/1/2004
201070002 1 1/21/1999
201730008 1 1/27/1999
201730009 1 1/27/1999
201730010 1 1/12/1999
201770013 1 11/16/2006
201910002 1 11/17/1999
202090021 1 4/27/1999
202090021 2 4/30/1999
202090022 1 4/30/1999
KENTUCKY
2 0190017 1 1/1/1999
2 0290006 1 1/1/1999
2 0373002 1 8/1/2007
2 0470006 1 1/1/1999
2 0670012 1 1/1/1999
2 0670014 1 12/21/1998
2 0730006 1 1/1/1999
2 0930006 2 12/1/2009
2 010014 1 4/1/2003
2 010014 2 4/1/2003
2 110043 1 6/15/1998
2 110048 1 1/1/1999
2 110051 1 6/15/1998
2 110067 1 1/1/2009
2 170007 1 1/1/1999
2 510003 1 6/15/1998
2 950002 1 1/1/1999
2 950002 2 1/1/1999
2 270008 1 9/6/2007
2 2270008 2 9/6/2007
LOUISIANA
220170008 2 12/30/2005
220190009 1 1/1/1999
220190010 1 1/1/1999
220330009 2 1/1/1999
220331001 1 1/1/1999
220470005 1 1/1/1999
220470009 1 1/1/1999
220511001 1 1/1/1999
220512001 1 1/1/1999
220550006 1 1/1/2000
220550007 1 12/12/2005
220730004 1 1/1/1999
221050001 1 1/1/1999
221050001 2 1/1/2002
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
221090001 1 1/1/2000
221210001 1 1/1/1999
MAINE
230010011 1 1/1/1999
230030013 1 1/1/1999
230030014 1 7/7/2009
230031011 1 10/1/1997
230090103 1 1/1/1999
230190002 1 1/1/1999
MARYLAND
240031003 1 1/1/1999
240051007 1 1/1/1999
240053001 1 1/1/1999
240150003 1 1/1/1999
240230002 3 7/1/2010
240251001 1 1/1/1999
240313001 1 1/1/1999
240313001 3 8/22/2008
240330025 1 1/1/2007
240330030 1 7/10/2004
240330030 2 7/31/2010
240330030 3 7/3/2008
240338003 1 5/1/2002
240338003 2 7/1/2002
240430009 1 4/1/1999
240430009 3 7/1/2010
245100006 1 1/1/1999
245100007 1 1/1/1999
245100008 1 6/20/2001
245100035 1 1/1/1999
245100035 2 1/1/1999
245100040 1 1/1/1999
245100040 3 7/3/2008
MASSACHUSETTS
250035001 1 1/3/1999
250051004 1 1/1/2003
250092006 1 1/3/1999
250095005 1 1/3/1999
250096001 1 4/3/1999
250130008 2 1/1/2006
250130016 1 1/3/1999
250132009 1 1/1/2002
250230004 1 1/3/1999
250250002 1 1/3/1999
250250027 1 1/3/1999
250250043 1 4/9/1999
250250043 2 5/1/2005
250270016 1 1/22/2000
MICHIGAN
260050003 1 10/31/1998
260170014 1 8/24/2000
260210014 1 11/7/1998
260330901 1 1/31/2001
260330901 2 1/31/2001
260330902 1 1/31/2001
260330903 1 10/1/2005
260470004 1 4/23/2009
260490021 1 12/16/1998
260650012 1 11/7/1998
260770008 1 11/19/1998
260770008 2 11/19/1998
260810007 1 1/3/2007
260810020 1 10/23/1998
260810020 2 10/23/1998
260910007 1 4/3/2008
260990009 1 12/22/1998
261010922 1 4/2/2006
261130001 1 2/8/2003
26 150005 1 12/17/1999
26 210040 1 12/18/1998
26 250001 1 12/25/1998
26 390005 1 11/7/1998
26 470005 1 1/3/1999
26 610008 1 8/4/1999
26 610008 2 8/4/1999
26 630001 1 5/12/1999
26 630001 2 5/12/1999
26 630015 1 2/26/1999
26 630016 1 5/12/1999
26 630019 1 4/30/2000
26 630033 1 2/5/1999
26 630033 2 2/5/1999
26 630036 1 2/20/1999
26 630038 1 12/26/2004
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
261630039 1 8/26/2005
MINNESOTA
270031002 1 1/1/2010
270210001 1 1/3/2003
270210001 2 1/3/2003
270370470 1 10/3/2000
270530961 1 4/12/1999
270530963 1 1/7/2001
270531007 1 4/24/1999
270953051 1 12/6/1999
27 230866 1 4/1/1999
27 230866 2 7/12/1999
27 230868 1 3/31/1999
27 230871 1 4/24/1999
27 377001 1 5/30/1999
27 377551 1 1/1/2000
27 390505 1 1/1/2000
27 453052 1 12/20/1999
MISSISSIPPI
280010004 1 3/10/1999
280110001 1 5/21/1999
280330002 1 2/14/1999
280350004 1 3/7/1999
280430001 1 12/1/2001
280450003 1 6/1/2005
280470008 1 4/3/1999
280490010 1 2/14/1999
280490019 1 10/1/2009
280590006 1 2/14/1999
280670002 1 3/7/1999
280750003 1 4/3/1999
280810005 1 2/14/1999
280870001 1 3/7/1999
MISSOURI
290210005 1 6/10/2004
290210005 3 10/1/2009
290370003 1 1/1/2000
290370003 3 12/1/2009
290390001 1 1/1/1999
290390001 3 10/1/2009
290470005 1 1/1/1999
290470005 3 1/1/2005
290770032 1 1/3/1999
290770032 2 1/3/1999
290950034 1 2/2/2003
290950034 2 1/1/2006
290950034 3 3/12/2003
290990012 1 1/1/1999
290990019 1 3/1/2008
290990019 3 10/1/2009
291831002 1 1/1/1999
291890015 1 9/26/2008
291892003 1 1/1/1999
291892003 2 1/1/1998
291893001 3 7/1/2009
295100007 1 1/1/1999
295100085 2 3/30/1999
MONTANA
300131026 1 1/1/2000
300290007 1 4/3/2008
300290009 1 10/1/2001
300290009 3 5/7/2010
300290047 1 6/26/1999
300290047 3 5/7/2010
300310006 1 8/5/2005
300310008 1 1/1/2000
300310016 1 1/1/2007
300310016 3 7/1/2008
300490018 1 1/1/1999
300490018 3 7/1/2008
300490026 1 1/1/2007
300490026 3 8/4/2009
300530018 1 1/1/1999
300630024 3 11/15/2008
300630031 1 1/1/1999
300630037 3 10/1/2009
300750001 3 1/1/2010
300810007 1 6/27/2005
300810007 3 7/1/2008
300830001 3 10/10/2008
300890007 1 1/1/2000
300930005 1 2/11/1999
300930005 3 3/19/2010
301111065 1 1/1/1999
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
State
11 Monitor
POC | begin date
NEBRASKA
NEVA!
NEWI
NEWJ
NEWS
NEW}
310550019 2 1/1/1999
310550019 3 9/30/2009
310550052 1 1/1/1999
31 090022 1 1/1/1999
31 090022 2 1/1/1999
31 530007 1 3/1/1999
31 530007 3 7/1/2010
31 570003 1 3/1/1999
31 570004 1 5/13/2009
31 770002 1 4/6/1999
DA
320030540 1 10/2/2010
320030561 1 4/14/2004
320030561 2 4/14/2004
320031019 1 1/1/1999
320032002 1 1/1/1999
320310016 1 1/1/1999
320310016 2 1/1/1999
320310016 3 12/16/2010
lAMPSHIRE
330012004 1 4/1/2001
330012004 2 4/1/2001
330050007 1 1/1/1999
330050007 3 10/1/2008
330090010 1 1/1/2005
330090010 3 12/1/2008
330111015 1 1/1/2005
330131006 2 1/1/2006
330150014 3 4/1/2004
330190003 1 1/1/1999
IERSEY
340010006 1 1/1/2007
340011006 1 7/27/2001
340030003 1 1/1/1999
340030007 1 9/10/2007
340030007 2 9/10/2007
340030007 3 9/10/2007
340030008 1 91 0/2007
340030008 2 91 0/2007
340030008 3 91 0/2007
340030009 1 91 0/2007
340030009 2 91 0/2007
340030009 3 91 0/2007
340070003 1 1/1/1999
340070003 2 1/1/1999
340071007 1 1/1/1999
340130003 1 6/1/2009
340 30015 1 4/21/1999
340 50004 1 2/2/2007
340 71003 1 1/1/1999
340 72002 1 1/1/1999
340 10008 1 1/1/1999
340218001 1 1/1/1999
340230006 1 1/1/1999
340270004 1 5/30/1999
340273001 1 1/1/1999
340292002 1 2/11/1999
340310005 1 1/1/1999
340390004 1 1/1/1999
340390004 2 1/1/1999
340390004 3 1/1/2010
340390006 1 1/1/1999
340392003 1 12/11/1999
340410006 1 8/10/1999
340410007 1 9/26/2010
/ffiXJCO
350010023 1 2/3/1999
350010023 2 1/5/2000
350010024 1 2/3/1999
350050005 1 1/1/1999
350130017 1 1/1/1999
350130025 1 I/ 2001
350171002 1 I/ 1999
350250008 1 2/1 /2005
350431003 1 I/ 1999
350450006 1 I/ 1999
350450019 1 10/1/2008
350450019 2 10/1/2008
350490020 1 1/1/1999
ORE
360010005 1 1/1/1999
360010012 1 1/1/1999
360050110 1 9/15/1999
360050133 1 1/1/2008
360130011 1 1/1/1999
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
date | date | 240)
12/29/2012 SLAMS
12/31/2010 12/31/2010 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
6/30/2010 6/28/2010 SLAMS
12/31/2012 SLAMS
5/13/2009 5/10/2009 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
12/29/2012 SLAMS
9/29/2010 9/29/2010 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 R.OPOSEDNCOI
10/30/2012 SLAMS
12/31/2008 12/26/2008 SLAMS
10/30/2012 SLAMS
10/31/2012 SLAMS
10/24/2012 SLAMS
10/31/2012 SLAMS
10/30/2012 SLAMS
10/30/2012 SLAMS
10/31/2012 SLAMS
12/31/2008 12/26/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/21/2008 9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2008 9/19/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2008 9/9/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
7/25/2008 7/23/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
7/15/2012 SLAMS
6/14/2012 SLAMS
6/3/2012 SLAMS
7/13/2011 7/11/2011 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
7/12/2011 7/11/2011 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/7/2009 9/7/2009 SLAMS
9/21/2008 9/21/2008 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
9/30/2012 SLAMS
12/26/2012 SLAMS
8/31/2012 SLAMS
6/17/2010 SLAMS
3/31/2012 SLAMS
3/31/2012 SLAMS
MT SLAMS
01/01/1999,09/30/2009
10/01/2009,12/31/2010
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
03/01/1999,06/30/2010
07/01/2010,
03/01/1999,05/13/2009
05/1 3/2009,
04/06/1999,
10/02/2010,
04/14/2004,
04/14/2004,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,09/29/2010
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/2011,
04/01/2001,
04/01/2001,12/31/2008
01/01/1999,
1 0/01/2008,
01/01/2005,12/31/2008
12/01/2008,
01/01/2005,
01/01/2006,
04/01/2004,12/31/2009
01/01/1999,12/31/2008
01/01/2007,
07/27/2001 ,
01/01/1999,
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
09/10/2007,09/21/2008
01/01/1999,09/30/2008
01/01/1999,09/30/2008
01/01/1999,
06/01/2009,
04/21/1999,07/25/2008
02/02/2007,
01/01/1999,
07/24/2005,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
05/30/1999,
01/01/1999,
02/11/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/1999,
01/01/2010,
01/01/1999,
12/11/1999,
08/10/1999,
09/26/2010,
02/03/1999,
01/05/2000,
02/03/1999,
01/01/2006,07/13/2011
01/01/2006,
01/01/2006,
01/01/2006,07/12/2011
01/01/2006,
01/01/2006,09/07/2009
01/01/2006,09/21/2008
10/01/2008,
10/01/2008,
01/01/2006,
01/01/1999,
01/13/2008,
09/15/1999,
01/01/2008,
01/01/1999,
MT TRIBAL 1 1 1 EPA
MONITOR | MT NCORE 1 MT NON-REG 1 REG
01/01/2011, 7
07/01/2010,12/31/2010 7
?
7
7
7
7
9
9
9
9
9
07/01/2010, 9
07/01/2010, 9
01/01/2011, 9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
07/01/2010, 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
07/01/2010, 6
07/01/2010, 6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 % 1 Qtr4 %
118 72 83 100 83
118 88 100 100 93
118 90 93 100 97
118 44 83 67 100
118 67 90 97 93
118 93 80 81 90
118 81 93 81 83
155 94 97 87 93
155 89 87 100 100
155 88 100 90 87
155 76 83 100 100
120 100 100 100 100
120 100 100 100 100
116 100 100 100 100
116 100 100 100 100
116 100 100 93 100
170 0 0 0 98
116 94 100 100 100
170 0 0 0 16
116 100 97 93 97
117 100 100 100 100
0000
116 94 100 100 100
118 79 60 90 87
118 82 77 91 67
118 94 83 81 90
117 89 93 87
000
000
117 86 100 87
000
000
117 83 100 87
000
000
118 84 75 76
117 83 73 53
118 90 80 90 90
118 94 87 100
118 91 93 93 80
118 93 86 80 95
118 100 67 93 100
118 97 86 91 99
118 91 50 80 93
118 81 93 94 97
118 97 93 74 83
118 80 83 97 93
118 100 83 98 94
118 100 93 90 93
118 87 57 74 99
117 78 60 60 73
118 97 93 91 100
118 94 73 97 100
118 94 73 97 100
118 89 92 97 97
118 80 87 87 93
118 97 100 92 87
118 78 80 84 53
118 91 99 98 77
118 100 90 87 90
118 90 77 80 97
118 97 93 87 73
118 97 100 97 100
118 80 87 100
118 0 0 0 97
0000
118 94 100 94 100
118 97 99 97 96
118 86 97 78 83
118 87 89 93 98
118 88 100 100 97
118 69 97 94 93
A114Qsl
75%+ |Year%
85
Y 95
Y 95
74
87
Y 86
Y 85
Y 93
Y 94
Y 91
Y 90
Y 100
Y 100
Y 100
Y 100
Y 98
25
Y 99
4
Y 97
Y 100
0
Y 99
79
79
Y 87
90
0
0
91
0
0
90
0
0
78
70
Y 87
92
Y 89
Y 89
90
Y 93
79
Y 91
87
Y 88
Y 94
Y 94
79
68
Y 95
91
91
Y 94
Y 87
Y 94
74
Y 91
Y 92
Y 86
88
Y 98
89
24
0
Y 97
Y 97
Y 86
Y 92
Y 96
88
2009 Completeness
Method | Qtrl % Qtr2 %
118 89 100
170 0 0
0 100 94
118 90 100
118 100 100
0 59 80
118 62 65
118 0 47
0 84 100
155 96 100
155 100 100
155 93 94
155 100 100
0 96 100
0 100 100
116 100 100
116 100 100
170 93 89
170 90 92
116 96 100
0 100 100
0 0
118 91 97
118 100 97
118 97 97
118 97 100
118 0 0
118 80 100
118 89 87
118 97 97
118 93 96
118 91 93
118 91 94
118 93 90
118 100 90
118 98 94
118 94 93
118 97 84
117 100 76
118 88 100
118 100 90
118 100 97
118 90 100
118 93 100
118 79 94
118 60 49
118 96 93
118 94 91
118 96 83
118 87 39
118 96 94
118 93 93
0 0
118 100 100
118 99 99
118 100 81
118 100 81
118 100 100
118 100 100
II
Qtr3 % Qtr4 % | 75%+ Year %
100 0 72
0 99 25
97 87 Y 94
100 100 Y 98
100 89 Y 97
97 83 80
63
57 22 31
100 97 Y 95
100 80 Y 94
100 93 Y 98
90 87 Y 91
100 97 Y 99
100 100 Y 99
100 100 Y 100
100 93 Y 98
100 100 Y 100
98 93 Y 93
92 99 Y 93
97 97 Y 97
100 33 83
00 0
100 100 Y 97
80 61 85
100 84 Y 94
83 97 Y 94
100 91 48
100 100 Y 95
100 88 Y 91
97 94 Y 96
100 95 Y 96
97 88 Y 92
100 97 Y 95
100 91 Y 94
97 94 Y 95
99 91 Y 96
100 93 Y 95
99 97 Y 94
100 100 Y 94
100 90 Y 95
100 100 Y 98
97 90 Y 96
97 93 Y 95
100 80 Y 93
77 77 Y 82
67 65 60
81 85 Y 89
90 90 Y 91
93 100 Y 93
50 13 47
41 77
93 87 Y 92
00 0
87 100 Y 97
99 65 90
90 100 Y 93
84 95 Y 90
100 100 Y 100
90 97 Y 97
2010 Completeness
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 %
145
170 97 96 98
145 73 93 81
145 100 100 100
145 100 100 100
145 63 90
170 0 0 88
145 83 77 87
145 100 97 97
155 0 0 0
155 93 97 93
155 93 100 100
155 90 100 97
155 93 100 100
116 87 100 97
116 100 100 100
170 0 0 0
116 100 100 100
116 100 100 100
170 99 94 99
170 95 96 83
0 93 97 100
0 100 100 100
170 29 73 96
118 90 100 100
118 100 93 97
118 100 97 100
118 97 100 97
118 100 90 97
118 63 97 91
118 95 98 100
118 80 100 97
118 97 99 100
118 100 100 62
118 97 90 100
118 90 100 90
118 97 97 97
118 81 99 92
118 97 97 90
118 89 97 92
117 93 100 94
117 93 100 100
118 67 100 97
118 83 100 100
118 97 90 94
118 0 0 33
118 100 100 94
118 100 100 77
118 100 100 90
118 53 100 80
118 77 87 93
118 83 100 68
118 87 77 94
118 57 93 91
118 60 100 85
000
118 100 90 84
118 92 88 91
118 73 70 100
118 93 92 0
118 100 100 97
118 97 90 100
II
Qtr4% 75%+ JYear%
24 79
81 82
97 Y 99
100 Y 100
77
92 45
81 Y 82
100 Y 98
90 23
90 Y 93
100 Y 98
90 Y 94
98
100 Y 96
100 Y 100
32 8
100 Y 100
100 Y 100
99 Y 98
94 Y 92
97 Y 97
100 Y 100
85 71
100 Y 98
87 Y 94
97 Y 98
90 Y 96
100 Y 97
100 88
88 Y 95
91 Y 92
99 Y 99
90 88
100 Y 97
100 Y 95
90 Y 95
88 Y 90
74 90
98 Y 94
93 Y 95
80 Y 93
87 88
100 Y 96
93 Y 93
100 33
94 Y 97
80 Y 89
97 Y 97
97 83
97 Y 88
90 85
81 Y 85
97 84
88 83
0 0
94 Y 92
95 Y 92
90 83
0 46
100 Y 99
100 Y 97
AllQtrs 1 Avg.
75%+ | Capture
79
52
90
Y 97
90
81
45
75
57
Y 93
23
Y 93
Y 97
Y 92
96
Y 98
Y 100
8
Y 99
100
Y 99
72
99
63
Y 97
94
24
99
91
86
Y 93
90
0
0
91
0
0
90
0
0
78
70
Y 92
73
92
91
Y 92
93
Y 96
86
Y 94
92
Y 93
Y 93
93
89
86
93
93
95
93
33
Y 95
Y 90
Y 91
72
Y 89
89
Y 88
73
88
89
66
0
Y 95
93
87
76
Y 98
94
Page 9
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
360290005 1 1/1/1999
360310003 1 7/1/1999
360470122 1 1/1/2001
360590008 1 1/1/1999
360610056 1 1/1/1999
360610079 1 1/1/2000
360610128 1 10/1/2001
360610134 1 3/25/2007
360632008 1 1/1/1999
360671015 1 1/1/1999
360710002 1 12/31/1999
360810124 1 1/1/2001
360850055 1 9/1/1999
360850067 1 1/1/1999
360893001 1 10/1/1999
361010003 1 8/1/1999
361030002 1 1/1/2006
361191002 1 2/1/2000
NORTH CAROLINA
370010002 1 1/1/1999
370210034 1 1/1/1999
370210034 2 1/1/1999
370330001 1 1/1/1999
370350004 1 1/1/1999
370350004 2 8/16/2008
370370004 1 1/1/1999
370510009 1 1/1/1999
370570002 1 1/1/1999
370610002 1 1/1/1999
370630015 1 9/15/2007
370650004 1 1 /2004
370670022 1 1 /1999
370670022 2 1 /1999
370670022 3 1 /1 999
370670022 5 2/ 8/2007
370670030 2 8/1/2004
370710016 1 1/1/1999
370810013 1 12/14/2001
370810013 2 12/14/2001
370810014 1 12/15/2007
370870012 1 1/1/2008
370990006 1 4/1/2000
370990006 2 4/1/2000
37 10002 1 1/1/2009
37 70004 1 1/1/1999
37 10004 1 1/1/1999
37 10004 2 4/1/2005
37 70001 1 9/25/2003
37 90041 1 7/30/1999
37 90042 1 9/12/2000
37 90043 1 1/1/2006
37 10001 1 1/1/1999
37 30001 1 7/16/1999
37 90002 1 7/1/2002
37 50007 1 1/1/1999
37 70005 1 3/1/1999
37 70006 1 4/3/2008
37 50005 1 11/23/2000
37 90021 1 1/1/2005
37 30002 1 1/1/1999
37 30002 3 6/17/2009
37 30014 1 1/1/1999
37 30014 2 1/1/1999
37 30014 3 6/1/2009
37 30020 1 1/1/2008
37 90003 1 9/15/2001
NORTH DA OTA
380070002 1 7/1/2000
380130004 3 7/15/2010
380150003 2 1/25/2006
380150003 3 1/1/2009
380171004 3 4/12/2010
380530002 3 7/29/2010
380570004 1 1/1/1999
380570004 3 7/23/2010
380571113 1 4/10/2009
380610115 1 4/14/2009
380610115 2 4/14/2009
OHIO
390030009 1 3/3/2010
390090003 1 1/3/1999
390170003 1 1/1/1999
390170016 1 10/3/2000
390230005 1 7/26/2000
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
390250022 1 1/1/2005
390350027 1 1/8/1999
390350034 1 7/11/2000
390350038 1 1/8/1999
390350045 1 12/14/1999
390350060 1 1/8/1999
390350065 1 1/29/1999
390351002 1 1/8/1999
390490024 1 1/1/1999
390490025 1 1/1/1999
390490029 3 6/24/2010
390490081 1 1/1/1999
390570005 1 10/3/2003
390610006 1 1/1/2005
390610014 1 1/1/1999
390610040 1 4/3/1999
390610042 1 10/3/2000
390610043 1 10/3/2000
390617001 1 1/30/1999
390618001 1 3/25/1999
390810017 1 11/1/2003
390811001 1 2/11/1999
390850007 1 1/1/2009
390853002 1 1/11/2006
390870010 1 1/24/1999
390870012 1 2/12/2008
390933002 1 1/5/2002
390950024 1 2/11/1999
390950025 1 3/1/1999
390950028 1 10/24/2008
390990005 1 1/1/1999
390990014 1 10/5/2002
39 030003 1 4/1/2005
39 030004 3 9/1/2009
39 130032 1 8/1/2001
39 330002 1 1/30/1999
39 510017 1 1/3/1999
39 510020 1 1/3/1999
39 530017 1 1/1/1999
39 530017 3 3/5/2010
39 530023 1 1/1/1999
39 550005 1 1/2/2010
39 550007 1 1/1/1999
OKLAHOMA
400019009 1 11/2/2008
400019009 2 3/16/2009
400159008 1 4/24/2000
400159008 2 10/1/2003
400219002 1 8/22/1999
400219002 2 8/28/1999
400719010 1 1/3/2003
400970186 1 2/28/1999
400979014 1 1/1/2004
401010169 1 1/25/1999
401090035 1 1/1/1999
401090035 2 4/6/1999
401091037 1 1/1/1999
401159004 1 7/1/1999
401159004 2 8/16/1999
401210415 1 4/1/1999
401359015 1 10/3/2004
401359015 2 2/6/2008
401430110 1 1/1/1999
401431127 1 1/13/2001
OREGON
410130100 1 1/1/2009
410170120 1 3/1/2001
410250002 1 10/3/1999
410250003 1 9/16/2009
410290133 1 1/1/1999
410290133 2 1/1/2001
410291001 1 1/1/1999
410330114 1 6/15/2002
410350004 1 1/1/1999
410370001 1 1/1/1999
410390058 1 1/1/2008
410390060 1 1/1/1999
410390060 2 1/2/2002
410391009 1 1/4/2004
410392013 1 1/1/1999
410399002 1 1/1/2007
410399004 1 1/1/2008
410432002 1 7/1/2007
410510080 1 1/1/1999
410510246 1 8/27/1999
410590121 1 1/1/1999
410610119 1 12/10/2003
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
date | date | 240) MT SLAMS
12/31/2011 12/29/2011 SLAMS 01/01/2005,12/31/2011
7/6/2009 7/6/2009 SLAMS 01/08/1999,07/06/2009
12/29/2012 SLAMS 07/1 1/2000,
12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/03/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 12/14/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/08/1999,05/21/2009
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/29/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/08/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
12/31/2012 SLAMS 06/24/2010,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/03/2003,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2005,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 04/01/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/03/2000,
12/31/2008 12/29/2008 SLAMS 10/03/2000,12/31/2008
12/31/2010 12/31/2010 SLAMS 01/30/1999,12/31/2010
2/7/2010 2/7/2010 SLAMS 03/25/1999,02/07/2010
12/31/2012 SLAMS 11/01/2003,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 02/1 1/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2009,
12/31/2008 12/29/2008 SLAMS 01/11/2006,12/31/2008
2/11/2008 2/9/2008 SLAMS 01/24/1999,02/11/2008
12/29/2012 SLAMS 02/12/2008,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/05/2002,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/14/1999,
10/21/2008 10/21/2008 SLAMS 03/01/1999,10/21/2008
12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/24/2008,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 10/05/2002,
12/31/2010 12/31/2010 SLAMS 04/01/2005,12/31/2010
2/29/2012 2/29/2012 DN-REGULATOI 01/01/201 1,01/31/201 1
12/29/2012 SLAMS 08/01/2001,
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/30/1999,
'
/31/2012 SLAMS 01/03/1999,
/26/2012 SLAMS 01/03/1999,
/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
4/21/2011 /21/2011 SLAMS 03/05/2010,04/21/2011
/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
/29/2012 SLAMS 01/02/2010,
11/17/2008 /17/2008 SLAMS 01/01/1999,11/17/2008
SLAMS 01/01/2007,12/31/2011
4/27/2010 4/26/2010 R.OPOSED NCORE 1
12/31/2012 DN-REGULATORY
8/26/2011 6/26/2011 ilBAL MONITORS 0
8/26/2011 6/26/2011 3JBAL MONITORS 1
1/14/2008 12/26/2007 3JBAL MONITORS 0
1/14/2008 12/26/2007 ilBAL MONITORS 0
1/2/2008 12/26/2007 ilBAL MONITORS 0
1/31/2011 1/30/2011 SLAMS 01/01/2007,01/31/2011
1/3/2008 12/26/2007 3JBAL MONITORS 0
1/31/2011 1/30/2011 SLAMS 01/01/2007,01/31/2011
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007,
3/31/2012 3/28/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007,03/31/2012
12/29/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007,
10/1/2010 9/29/2010 ilBAL MONITORS 0
10/1/2010 9/29/2010 ilBAL MONITORS 0
12/29/2012 SLAMS 04/01/1999,
4/27/2010 4/26/2010 3JBAL MONITORS 1
4/27/2010 4/26/2010 ilBAL MONITORS 0
3/31/2010 3/30/2010 SLAMS 01/01/1999,03/31/2010
12/31/2012 SLAMS 01/13/2001,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2009,
12/31/2010 12/28/2010 SLAMS 03/01/2008,12/31/2010
4/1/2010 3/30/2010 SLAMS 01/01/2007,04/01/2010
9/30/2012 SLAMS 09/16/2009,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2001,
11/1/2010 10/23/2010 SLAMS 01/01/1999,11/01/2010
9/30/2012 SLAMS 1 1/01/2006,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2007,
6/29/2011 6/29/2011 SLAMS 01/01/2008,06/29/2011
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/02/2002,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/04/2004,
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/1999,
4/1/2008 3/31/2008 SLAMS 01/01/2007,04/01/2008
9/30/2012 SLAMS 01/01/2008,
4/4/2012 4/3/2012 SLAMS 11/01/2010,04/04/2012
9/30/2012 R.OPOSEDNCOI 01/01/1999,08/01/2008
12/31/2010 12/28/2010 SLAMS 08/27/1999,12/31/2010
9/30/2012 SLAMS 10/01/2006,
12/31/2010 12/28/2010 SLAMS 12/10/2003,12/31/2010
MT TRIBAL III EPA
MONITOR | MT NCORE 1 MT NON-REG 1 REG
07/01/2010,
06/24/2010,
09/01/2009,02/29/20
07/01/2010,
/02/2008.04/27/201 0
03/16/2009, 07/01/2010, 03/16/2009,
4/24/2000,08/26/201 1
0/01/2003,08/26/2011
8/22/1999,01/14/2008
8/28/1999,01/14/2008
/03/2003.0 1/02/2008
/01/2004.0 1/03/2008
8/16/1999,10/01/2010
8/16/1999,10/01/2010
0/03/2004,04/27/201 0
2/06/2008,04/27/201 0
07/01/2010,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
07/01/2010, 0
0
0
0
1 A.MQ.I
Method Qtrl % 1 Qtr2 % Qtr3 % 1 Qtr4 % 75%+ 1 Year %
120 88 100 93 100 Y 95
120 90 93 87 77 Y 87
120 85 100 97 93 Y 94
120 97 100 97 97 Y 98
120 91 97 84 90 Y 90
120 56 100 97 97 87
120 94 100 94 100 Y 97
120 71 90 97 100 89
120 90 100 93 93 Y 94
120 77 97 97 93 Y 91
120 85 93 100 97 Y 94
0 97 100 93 100 Y 98
120 96 97 93 97 Y 96
120 94 100 97 100 Y 98
0 90 87 90 83 Y 88
120 85 90 90 100 Y 91
120 93 100 90 100 Y 96
0 94 97 87 90 Y 92
120 84 97 100 97 Y 94
120 100 83 90 73 87
120 94 87 100 93 Y 94
120 75 100 100 87 Y 91
120 75 75
120 61 90 97 83 83
120 94 97 97 97 Y 96
120 94 98 92 86 Y 93
120 62 93 94 86 83
0 0 0 0 68 17
120 100 100 93 93 Y 97
120 99 98 97 97 Y 98
120 94 100 91 87 Y 93
120 93 97 98 94 Y 95
120 97 100 100 83 Y 95
120 94 100 100 97 Y 98
0 0 40 74 97 53
0 0 53 70 90 53
120 87 100 100 100 Y 97
120 97 90 93 93 Y 93
120 97 90 97 100 Y 96
120
145 0 0 0 67 17
118 94 87 100 100 Y 95
118 81 53 87 100 80
0 0
0 0
0 0
118 97 97 94 97 Y 96
0 0
118 100 87 97 93 Y 94
118 100 100 100 100 Y 100
118 100 93 100 100 Y 98
118 97 90 94 93 Y 94
118 100 93 100 93 Y 97
118 100 93 93 87 Y 93
118 100 100 93 100 Y 98
145 56 87 67 80 72
145 44 93 73 93 76
118 100 93 100 77 Y 93
118 98 96 100 96 Y 97
118 33 100 80 93 77
117 92 87 73 100 88
118 100 88 100 96 Y 96
118 89 83 78 100 Y 88
118 94 100 73 93 90
118 94 93 93 87 Y 92
0 90 100 97 100 Y 97
0 100 97 94 97 Y 97
118 100 100 93 90 Y 96
118 97 94 92 93 Y 94
117 100 100 100 100 Y 100
117 100 100 100 100 Y 100
118 97 100 100 99 Y 99
118 94 0 71
118 100 100 97 93 Y 98
118 0 0 69 12 20
118 100 97 97 93 Y 97
118 100 100 97 100 Y 99
118 89 100 100 100 Y 97
117 100 93 100 93 Y 97
2009 Completeness
Method | Qtrl % Qtr2 %
120 100 97
120 80 90
120 94 100
120 94 100
120 97 94
120 90 60
120 94 97
120 88 93
120 84 100
120 79 100
120 90 100
142 100 100
120 100 100
120 91 99
142 89 90
0 97 88
142 100 93
120 100 97
120 97 94
120 93 100
120 87 93
120 91 93
120 96 100
120 95 97
0 87 84
120 100 100
120 88 100
120 96 91
182 0 0
0 95 100
120 94 100
116 61 90
116 87 84
0 72 95
0 94 90
120
145 94 93
170 22 92
118 100 94
118 100 89
118 100 97
118 90 93
118 100 100
118 100 100
118 90 97
118 93 100
118 88 100
118 100 100
145 82 82
145 100 100
118 100 97
118 93 85
118 86 87
118 81 93
0 100 88
0 0
118 90 94
118 100 100
118 100 100
118 100 87
118 93 94
118 100 100
118 100 97
118 96 99
117 100 100
117 100 93
118 100 100
118 100 97
118 80 0
118 100 87
118 100 84
118 93 87
117 92 100
|ill
-------
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
0670004 1 1/28/2005
0670004 2 7/1/2010
PENNSY LVANIA
0010001 3 7/1/2009
0030008 1 2/23/1999
0030008 2 1/1/2005
0030064 1 1/23/1999
0030064 2 1/1/2005
0030067 1 4/12/1999
0031008 1 2/13/1999
0031301 1 1/30/1999
0050001 3 7/1/2009
0070014 1 12/1/1999
0070014 3 10/7/2010
0110011 1 7/1/2007
0110011 3 10/7/2010
0130801 3 6/1/2010
0170012 1 1/1/1999
0170012 3 6/1/2010
0210011 1 1/1/1999
0210011 3 4/1/2009
0270100 1 2/1/2000
0270100 3 9/1/2010
0290100 1 1/1/2002
0290100 3 7/1/2009
0410101 1 3/29/2001
0410101 3 1/1/2009
0430401 1 1/1/1999
0430401 3 1/1/2009
0450002 1 1/1/1999
0450002 3 4/1/2009
0490003 1 1/1/1999
0490003 3 7/1/2009
0692006 1 1/1/1999
0692006 3 7/1/2009
0710007 1 1/1/1999
0710007 2 1/1/1999
0710007 3 10/7/2010
0850100 1 2/1/2000
0850100 3 11/3/2010
0890002 3 6/1/2010
0910013 1 1/1/1999
0910013 3 10/14/2010
0950025 1 1/1/1999
0950025 3 7/1/2009
0950027 1 1/1/2010
1010004 1 1/1/1999
1010004 2 1/1/1999
1010004 4 1/1/1999
1010024 1 1/1/1999
1010047 1 1/1/1999
1010047 4 7/1/2007
1010057 1 7/1/2007
1010057 4 12/28/2007
1011002 1 6/1/2010
1250005 1 1/1/1999
1250005 3 4/1/2009
1250200 1 1/1/1999
1250200 3 11/10/2010
1255001 1 1/1/1999
1255001 3 7/1/2009
1290008 1 1/1/1999
1290008 3 7/1/2009
1330008 1 1/1/1999
1330008 3 10/7/2010
RHODE LAND
0030002 1 1/6/1999
0030002 2 12/1/2008
0030002 3 12/11/2008
0070022 2 1/1/1999
0070026 1 3/2/2001
0070026 2 10/1/2009
0070028 1 1/1/2004
0071010 2 1/6/1999
SOUTH AROLINA
0130007 1 3/25/1999
0190049 1 11/26/1998
0410002 1 2/23/1999
0410003 1 8/10/2008
0450008 1 8/9/2001
0450009 1 5/30/1999
0450009 2 5/30/1999
0450015 1 4/27/2008
0470003 1 12/4/1998
0510002 1 11/1/2000
Metal
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
450630008 1 12/1/1998
450730001 1 12/31/1998
450790007 1 11/1/1998
450790019 1 11/26/1998
450790019 2 11/26/1998
450830010 1 11/13/1998
450830011 1 12/31/2008
SOUTH DAKOTA
460130003 1 12/20/1999
460290002 1 1/1/2003
460330132 1 1/1/2005
460330132 3 1/1/2009
460710001 1 12/31/1999
460710001 3 1/1/2009
460990006 1 1/1/1999
460990008 1 1/1/2008
460990008 3 1/1/2009
461031001 1 1/1/1999
461270002 1 1/1/2009
TENNESSEE
470370023 1 1/1/1999
470370023 2 1/1/1999
470370036 1 1/1/1999
470450004 1 8/22/1999
470654002 1 1/1/1999
470654002 2 1/1/1999
470930028 1 1/1/1999
470931017 1 1/1/1999
470931020 1 1/1/1999
470990002 1 10/1/1998
471130006 1 11/17/2004
471130006 2 11/17/2004
471251009 1 10/1/1998
471570014 1 12/1/1998
471570038 1 12/1/1998
471570047 1 12/1/1998
471570047 2 1/1/1999
471571004 1 12/1/1998
471631007 1 10/1/1998
471650007 1 10/1/1998
471650007 2 10/1/1998
TEXAS
481130069 1 1/1/1999
481130069 2 3/31/1999
481130087 1 1/3/1999
481350003 1 1/3/1999
481410037 1 1/1/1999
481410044 1 1/1/1999
482010058 1 1/6/1999
482011035 1 1/1/1999
482011035 2 4/6/1999
482150043 1 1/3/1999
483550032 1 1/6/1999
483550032 2 1/19/2000
483611001 1 3/13/2000
483750320 1 4/12/2005
484391002 2 12/8/1999
484391006 1 4/1/2001
UTAH
490050004 1 2/18/2000
490110004 1 7/12/2003
490137011 1 3/26/2009
490350003 1 1/1/1998
490353007 1 1/21/1999
490353007 2 8/19/2003
490353010 1 4/1/2007
490353010 2 5/18/2008
490490002 1 1/1/1998
490494001 1 1/1/1998
490494001 2 3/22/2003
490570002 1 7/1/2001
490570007 2 7/8/2003
490571003 1 11/5/2000
VERMONT
500030004 1 1/6/2003
500070012 1 7/29/1999
500070012 2 1/7/2000
500210002 1 1/3/1999
VIRGINIA
5 0030001 1 4/1/2008
5 0130020 1 1/1/1999
5 0130020 2 1/1/1999
5 0360002 1 1/1/1999
5 0410003 1 1/1/1999
5 0590030 1 1/1/1999
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
510591005 1 3/9/2002
510595001 1 1/1/1999
510690010 1 11/8/2007
510870014 1 1/1/1999
510870014 2 11/1/2004
510870015 1 1/1/1999
511071005 1 1/1/1999
511390004 1 10/1/1999
511650003 1 1/3/2007
516500004 1 1/1/1999
516500008 1 6/13/2010
516800015 1 4/1/2003
517000013 1 1/1/1999
517100024 1 1/1/1999
517100024 2 1/1/1999
517700014 1 1/1/1999
517700015 1 10/17/2006
517750011 1 11/1/2008
518100008 1 1/1/1999
WASHINGTON
530030004 1 3/28/2007
530070006 1 11/1/2007
530110013 1 11/19/1998
530330024 1 3/10/1999
530330057 1 10/17/1998
530330057 2 1/1/2008
530330057 3 12/27/2010
530330080 1 11/1/1998
530330080 3 3/1/2010
530332004 3 12/17/2010
530470013 1 10/23/2010
530530029 1 10/3/1999
530530029 3 12/27/2010
530530029 4 12/16/2010
530610020 1 7/21/2006
530610020 3 12/28/2010
530611007 1 10/28/1998
530630016 1 12/19/1998
530630016 2 1/1/2008
530630021 2 4/7/2009
530770009 1 5/6/2000
530770015 1 10/3/2008
530770016 1 11/6/2009
WEST VIRGINIA
540030003 1 2/14/1999
540090005 1 1/3/1999
540090011 1 1/3/1999
540090011 2 1/3/1999
540110006 2 1/24/2007
540291004 1 1/3/1999
540390010 1 5/12/2000
540391005 1 1/3/1999
540511002 1 1/3/1999
540690010 1 1/1/2005
541071002 1 1/3/1999
WISCONSIN
550030010 1 7 25 2002
550090005 1 1/1/1999
550090005 2 4/1/2004
550250041 1 4/2/2010
550250041 3 4/1/2010
550250047 1 1/3/1999
550270001 1 12/18/2009
550270001 3 2/3/2010
550270007 1 1/6/1999
550410007 1 2/1/2004
550410007 2 10/1/2005
550430009 1 1/6/1999
550590019 1 4/4/1997
550590019 3 6/24/2010
550630012 1 12/7/2005
550630012 3 7/14/2010
550710007 1 1/1/1999
550790010 2 1/1/1999
550790026 1 1/1/1999
550790026 2 4/1/2004
550790043 1 1/12/1999
550790058 1 11/3/2009
550790059 2 12/25/1998
550790099 1 2/5/1999
550870009 1 1/1/1999
550890009 1 6/23/2003
551091002 1 1/1/1999
551110007 1 5/9/2003
551110007 2 5/9/2003
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
Meta Data
II Monitor
POC 1 begin date
551198001 1 5/3/2003
551250001 1 1/1/1999
551330027 2 1/1/1999
WYOMING
560010006 1 7/12/2009
560131003 1 11/15/2001
560210001 1 10/15/1998
560210001 2 4/7/2009
560250001 1 5/19/2009
560290001 1 6/4/2008
560330002 1 10/1/1998
560330002 2 10/1/1998
560330003 1 9/1/2005
560370007 1 2/1/2008
PUERTO RICO
720010002 1 1/1/2005
720210009 1 2/2/1999
720530003 1 4/20/1999
720570008 1 1/15/1999
720590016 1 1/15/1999
720610005 1 1/15/1999
720690001 1 2/12/2000
720970006 1 2/21/2007
721130004 1 1/15/1999
721270003 1 3/21/1999
VIRGIN ISLANDS
780100012 1 1/12/1999
780100012 2 7/1/2002
Monitor endl Last san^ling 1 (from AQS AMP-
dtf, |
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachment 2
2008-2010 PM2.5 Collocated Precision Completeness at the Site and Primary
Quality Assurance Organization Level and 3-Year Precision Estimate
Notes on Completeness Estimates
"Start Date" is the later of the dates when a site became "primary" and when the site began
reporting data.
"End Date" is the earlier of the dates when as site ceased to be "primary" and when the site
ceased reporting data.
"# Routine Sites" is the number of primary sites operating in the PQAO
"# Required Collocated Sites" is 15% of EACH SAMPLING METHODOLOGY used in each
PQAO subj ect to a minimum of 1, as per 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A.
"# Actual Collocated Sites" is the number of sites actually reporting collocated precision data.
"% Comp for # Sites in PQAO" is the ratio of the # Actual to # Required.
"CV Upper Bound" is the 3-year estimate of precision at the PQAO level, as per 40 CFR Part
58 Appendix A.
"# Required Samples at Site" is the end date minus the start date divided by 12.
"# Actual Samples at Site" is the number of precision pairs collected at the site.
"% Comp for # Samples at Site and PQAO" is the ratio of # Actual to # Required for each
site. For the PQAO, it is the average of the largest available site-level % completeness where the
number of site-level values going into the average is the # Required Collocated Sites. For
example, PQAO 1136 in WA reported collocated data for 3 sites but was required to collocate
just 1. The largest available site-level % completeness is 91%, for site 530630021, thus this is
the % completeness associated with the PQAO.
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
State
CT
CT
CT
MA
MA
MA
MA
ME
ME
NH
NH
NH
NH
Rl
Rl
Rl
Rl
VT
VT
NJ
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
NY
PR
PR
VI
VI
DC
DC
DE
DE
MD
MD
MD
MD
PA
PA
PQAO
0251
0251
0251
0660
0660
0660
0660
0635
0635
0762
0762
0762
0762
0907
0907
0907
0907
1119
1119
0764
0764
0764
0768
0768
0768
0768
0889
0889
1124
1124
0350
0350
0294
0294
1002
1002
1002
1002
0021
0021
Site ID
90090027
90092123
ALL
250130008
250230004
250250043
ALL
230050029
ALL
330012004
330050007
330131006
ALL
440070022
440070026
440071010
ALL
500070012
ALL
340171003
340390004
ALL
360010005
360050110
360610079
ALL
720610005
ALL
780100012
ALL
110010041
ALL
100032004
ALL
240051007
240330030
240338003
ALL
420030008
420030064
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/22/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
15 2
12/31/2010
6 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
4 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
4 2
12/31/2010
4 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
19 3
12/31/2010
6/17/2010
12/31/2010
25 4
12/31/2010
7 1
12/28/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
3 1
12/31/2010
7 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
14 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
# Actual %Comp
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper
Sites in PQAO Bound
2 100% 10.48
3 100% 8.27
1 100% 8.04
3 100% 7.56
3 50% 6.87
1 100% 4.34
2 67% 9.49
3 75% 5.68
1 100% 7.58
1 100% 36.95
1 100% 5.84
1 100% 9.03
3 100% 5.01
ft
Required
Samples
at Site
91
91
91
91
91
90
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
75
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
# Actual %Compfor#
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
177
178
340
318
1044
81
61
130
170
164
17
26
351
156
145
320
263
333
64
76
176
145
61
12
76
158
152
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
90%
90%
67%
100%
100%
100%
100%
19%
29%
64%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
70%
70%
84%
84%
100%
100%
100%
100%
67%
13%
84%
75%
100%
100%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
State
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WV
WV
WV
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
PQAO
0021
0021
0851
0851
0851
0851
0861
0861
1127
1127
1127
1127
1150
1150
1150
0013
0013
0013
0013
0013
0013
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
1328
Site ID
420031301
ALL
420070014
420710007
421330008
ALL
421010004
ALL
510130020
510870014
517100024
ALL
540090011
540110006
ALL
10730023
10732003
10735002
10890014
11130001
ALL
120010023
120111002
120170005
120310099
120330004
120570030
120573002
120710005
120730012
120861016
120952002
120990009
120992005
121030018
121056006
121111002
121150013
121171002
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
5 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
18 3
12/31/2010
5 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
19 3
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
11 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
16 4
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
1/20/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
ft
# Actual % Comp Required
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper Samples
Sites in PQAO Bound at Site
91
3 100% 7.96
91
91
91
3 50% 11.51
91
1 100% 10.50
91
91
91
3 100% 4.00
91
91
2 100% 5.44
91
91
91
91
91
5 83% 3.17
91
91
91
91
91
63
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
# Actual % Comp for #
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
52
47
96
162
158
309
309
179
90
75
184
181
137
174
307
82
157
71
81
89
113
37
103
123
173
89
118
53
86
89
88
97
82
57%
100%
52%
100%
100%
84%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
82%
91%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
90%
100%
78%
89%
98%
100%
41%
100%
100%
100%
98%
100%
58%
95%
98%
97%
100%
90%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
State
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
MS
MS
MS
MS
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
SC
SC
SC
TN
TN
TN
TN
PQAO
1328
0437
0437
0437
0437
0437
0437
0437
0584
0584
0584
0584
0584
0584
0584
0703
0703
0703
0703
001
001
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0776
0971
0971
0971
1025
1025
1025
1025
Site ID
ALL
130210007
130510017
130890002
130892001
131210032
132450005
ALL
210373002
210930006
211010014
211110043
211950002
212270008
ALL
280330002
280670002
280810005
ALL
370990006
ALL
370210034
370350004
370510009
370670030
370810013
371110004
371190042
371230001
371830014
ALL
450450009
450790019
ALL
470370023
470654002
470931017
471130006
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
28 4
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
28 5
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
20 3
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
13 2
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
34 5
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
13 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
ft
# Actual % Comp Required
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper Samples
Sites in PQAO Bound at Site
18 100% 7.61
91
91
91
91
91
91
6 67% 9.52
91
91
91
91
91
91
6 100% 5.22
91
91
91
3 100% 6.89
91
1 100% 12.53
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
9 100% 8.19
91
91
2 100% 5.06
91
91
91
91
# Actual % Comp for #
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
97
97
67
47
290
107
50
59
92
435
143
149
101
155
45
138
200
155
57
217
154
167
169
18
218
154
151
195
334
160
340
100%
100%
100%
74%
52%
100%
100%
95%
55%
65%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
49%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
63%
100%
100%
100%
100%
20%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
State
TN
TN
TN
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
MN
MN
MN
MN
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PQAO
1025
1025
1025
0258
0258
0258
0513
0513
0513
0513
0513
0513
0520
0520
0520
0520
0520
0520
0520
0685
0685
0685
0685
0685
0685
W44
W44
0700
0700
0700
0700
0012
0012
0151
0151
0220
0220
0229
Site ID
471570047
471650007
ALL
170310052
170313301
ALL
170314201
171190024
171193007
171430037
171670012
ALL
180431004
180890031
180970081
181410015
181570008
181630020
ALL
260770008
260810020
261610008
261630001
261630033
ALL
260330901
ALL
271230866
271230871
271377550
ALL
391530017
ALL
391510017
ALL
390950024
ALL
390350038
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
3/10/2009
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
14 3
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
8 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
30 5
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
35 5
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
27 4
12/31/2010
3 1
12/30/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
15 2
12/31/2010
4 2
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
3 2
12/31/2010
ft
# Actual % Comp Required
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper Samples
Sites in PQAO Bound at Site
91
91
6 100% 8.39
91
91
2 100% 12.29
91
91
91
91
91
5 63% 9.06
91
91
91
91
91
55
6 50% 5.35
91
91
91
91
91
5 100% 6.02
91
1 100% 87.31
61
91
91
3 100% 5.22
91
1 50% 9.80
91
1 100% 4.42
91
1 50% 10.27
91
# Actual % Comp for #
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
178
352
151
140
158
151
153
160
135
156
148
167
157
143
102
130
142
142
82
54
4
53
78
92
161
167
128
91
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
90%
59%
98%
4%
4%
87%
86%
100%
93%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
Wl
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
LA
LA
LA
LA
NM
NM
NM
NM
PQAO
0229
0229
0287
0287
0595
0595
0634
0634
0805
0805
0807
0807
0809
0809
0880
0880
1259
1259
1259
1175
1175
1175
1175
1175
1175
0055
0055
0055
0055
0055
1001
1001
1001
1001
0017
0017
0765
0765
Site ID
390350060
ALL
391130032
ALL
390850007
ALL
390990005
ALL
390490025
ALL
390933002
ALL
390811001
ALL
391450013
ALL
390170003
390610014
ALL
550030010
550090005
550410007
550790026
551110007
ALL
50010011
50450002
51190007
51310008
ALL
220170008
220330009
221050001
ALL
350010023
ALL
350450019
ALL
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
10/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
7 1
12/31/2010
4 3
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
3 1
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
3 1
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
10 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
21 4
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
16 3
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
15 2
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
8 1
# Actual %Comp
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper
Sites in PQAO Bound
2 100% 6.76
1 33% 4.17
1 100% 7.20
1 100% 4.24
1 100% 4.68
1 100% 7.87
1 100% 7.82
1 100% 13.84
2 50% 5.17
5 100% 6.91
4 100% 2.60
3 100% 8.88
1 100% 9.45
1 100% 8.32
ft
Required
Samples
at Site
91
91
61
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
68
# Actual %Compfor#
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
37
142
114
170
161
167
148
141
173
171
178
85
137
87
81
166
165
167
153
71
72
74
152
205
41%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
93%
100%
96%
89%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
78%
79%
81%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
State
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
KS
KS
KS
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
NE
NE
NE
NE
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
MT
PQAO
807
807
812
812
905
905
920
920
1035
1035
1035
1035
1035
0613
0613
0874
0874
1080
1080
1080
0563
0563
0563
0588
0588
0588
0588
0588
0752
0752
0816
0816
0240
0240
0240
750
750
0730
Site ID
400159008
ALL
401090035
ALL
401359015
ALL
401159004
ALL
481130069
482011035
483550032
484391002
ALL
191130037
ALL
191530030
ALL
191390015
191630015
ALL
201730010
202090021
ALL
290770032
290950034
291892003
295100085
ALL
311090022
ALL
310550019
ALL
80010006
80310002
ALL
80677001
ALL
300530018
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
6/17/2009
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
7 1
4/26/2010
1 1
9/29/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
15 2
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
9 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
10 2
12/31/2010
9/30/2009
6/30/2009
12/31/2010
11 2
12/31/2010
3 1
9/30/2009
4 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
13 3
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
# Actual %Comp
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper
Sites in PQAO Bound
1 100% 8.82
1 100% 8.88
1 100% 10.05
1 100% 4.72
4 100% 7.38
1 100% 5.94
1 100% 8.47
2 100% 8.53
2 100% 6.47
4 100% 3.88
1 100% 9.70
1 100% 16.40
2 50% 7.01
1 100% 5.54
ft
Required
Samples
at Site
91
91
71
84
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
53
46
91
91
53
91
91
47
91
# Actual %Compfor#
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
155
181
114
159
173
146
137
29
336
166
111
161
165
161
105
47
46
94
156
43
174
184
59
82
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
32%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
89%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
81%
81%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
90%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
State
MT
MT
ND
ND
ND
ND
SD
SD
SD
UT
UT
UT
UT
WY
WY
WY
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
PQAO
0730
0730
0782
0782
0782
0782
0973
0973
0973
1113
1113
1113
1113
1188
1188
1188
0053
0053
0053
615
615
0643
0643
780
780
0864
0864
0865
0865
0086
0086
0086
0145
0145
0145
0145
0145
0145
Site ID
300630031
ALL
380150003
380171004
380570004
ALL
460990006
461031001
ALL
490050004
490353010
490494001
ALL
560210001
560330002
ALL
40139997
40230004
ALL
40137020
ALL
40130019
ALL
40011235
ALL
40191028
ALL
40210001
ALL
60130002
60531003
ALL
60190008
60271003
60290014
60571001
60670006
60710306
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
12/31/2010
13 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
4 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
7 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
9 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
8 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
6 2
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
3 1
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
2 1
12/31/2010
3 2
12/31/2010
12/27/2009
14 3
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
ft
# Actual % Comp Required
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper Samples
Sites in PQAO Bound at Site
91
2 100% 4.87
91
91
91
3 100% 17.14
91
91
2 50% 9.37
91
91
91
3 50% 9.85
91
91
2 100% 8.83
91
91
2 100% 7.64
91
1 100% 9.47
91
1 100% 8.72
91
1 100% 13.70
91
1 100% 18.76
91
1 50% 10.31
91
61
2 75% 6.13
91
91
91
91
91
91
# Actual % Comp for #
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
82
410
82
26
59
95
140
114
135
105
179
188
165
170
87
120
79
117
145
69
183
67
154
159
90
136
90%
90%
100%
90%
29%
100%
65%
100%
82%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
96%
96%
100%
100%
87%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
74%
100%
100%
99%
100%
-------
Attachment 2. 2008-2010 Collocated Precision Completeness at Site Level
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
NV
NV
NV
NV
AK
AK
ID
ID
ID
ID
OR
OR
OR
OR
WA
WA
WA
WA
PQAO
0145
0145
0145
577
577
0942
0942
0942
0972
0972
0972
0972
0226
0226
1138
1138
0015
0015
180
180
0511
0511
0821
0821
0821
0821
1136
1136
1136
1136
Site ID
60798001
61110007
ALL
60731011
ALL
60250005
60730006
ALL
60371103
60652002
60658001
ALL
320030561
ALL
320310016
ALL
20900010
ALL
160050020
ALL
160790017
ALL
410290133
410390060
410670004
ALL
530330057
530530029
530630021
ALL
Start Date *
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
4/3/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
3/29/2009
# Required
# Routine Collocated
End Date * Sites Sites
3/27/2010
12/31/2010
38 6
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
10 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
20 3
12/31/2010
3 1
12/31/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
4 1
8/30/2010
1 1
12/31/2010
7 2
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
19 3
12/30/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2010
8 1
ft
# Actual % Comp Required
Collocated for # Sites CV Upper Samples
Sites in PQAO Bound at Site
68
91
8 67% 11.61
91
1 100% 13.26
91
91
2 100% 11.52
91
91
91
3 100% 5.42
91
1 100% 10.40
91
1 100% 3.75
91
1 100% 7.43
73
1 100% 13.17
91
1 50% 6.04
91
91
91
3 50% 6.36
61
91
54
3 100% 6.36
# Actual % Comp for #
Samples Samples at Site and
at Site PQAO**
123
180
77
126
72
161
143
162
166
356
169
130
160
85
89
9
54
15
49
100%
100%
86%
85%
85%
100%
79%
90%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
93%
98%
10%
67%
89%
16%
91%
91%
* Start and End Dates denote time period that monitor was primary and reporting data. Start Date defined as >= 1/1/2008. End Date defined as <=12/31/2010.
** % Complete at PQAO level averages site-level % complete for # collocated sites required for PQAO, averaging the largest available site-level % complete.
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachment 3
2008-2010 PM2.5 Precision Completeness and 3-Year Precision Summary by
Primary Quality Assurance Organization Level and EPA Region
Notes
The attached information is derived from Attachment 2 and is simply summarized by Primary
Quality Assurance Organization and EPA Region.
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
Attachment 3. 2008-2010 Collocated
Region State
1 CT
1 MA
1 ME
1 NH
1 Rl
1 VT
Region 1 Summary
2 NJ
2 NY
2 PR
2 VI
Region 2 Summary
3 DC
3 DE
3 MD
3 PA
3 PA
3 PA
3 VA
3 WV
Region 3 Summary
4 AL
4 FL
4 GA
4 KY
4 MS
4 NC
4 NC
4 SC
4 TN
Region 4 Summary
5 IL
5 IL
5 IN
5 Ml
5 Ml
5 MN
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 OH
5 Wl
Region 5 Summary
6 AR
PQAO
0251
0660
0635
0762
0907
1119
0764
0768
0889
1124
0350
0294
1002
0021
0851
0861
1127
1150
0013
1328
0437
0584
0703
001
0776
0971
1025
0258
0513
0520
0685
W44
0700
0012
0151
0220
0229
0287
0595
0634
0805
0807
0809
0880
1259
1175
0055
Precision Completeness and
# Routine # Required
Sites Collocated Sites
12
15
6
4
4
4
45
19
25
7
1
52
3
7
14
5
18
5
19
11
82
16
28
28
20
13
1
34
13
14
167
8
30
35
27
3
15
4
2
3
7
4
1
2
3
1
3
2
10
21
181
16
2
2
1
2
2
1
10
3
4
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
2
14
4
4
5
3
2
1
5
2
3
29
1
5
5
4
1
2
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
39
3
Precision Estimates at PQAO Level
70 CoTHp ror »
# Actual CV Upper Samples at Site and
Collocated Sites Bound * PQAO
2
3
1
3
3
1
13
2
3
1
1
7
1
1
3
3
3
1
3
2
17
5
18
6
6
3
1
9
2
6
56
2
5
6
5
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
41
4
10.48
8.27
8.04
7.56
6.87
4.34
7.81
9.49
5.68
7.58
36.95
7.74*
5.84
9.03
5.01
7.96
11.51
10.50
4.00
5.44
7.84
3.17
7.61
9.52
5.22
6.89
12.53
8.19
5.06
8.39
7.84
12.29
9.06
5.35
6.02
87.31
5.22
9.80
4.42
10.27
6.76
4.17
7.20
4.24
4.68
7.87
7.82
13.84
5.17
6.91
7.78*
2.60
100%
100%
90%
100%
64%
100%
92%
100%
100%
70%
84%
88%
100%
100%
75%
100%
84%
100%
100%
91%
94%
100%
100%
95%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
98%
4%
93%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
94%
100%
-------
Attachment 3. 2008-2010 Collocated
Region State
6 LA
6 NM
6 NM
6 OK
6 OK
6 OK
6 OK
6 TX
Region 6 Summary
7 IA
7 IA
7 IA
7 KS
7 MO
7 NE
7 NE
Region 7 Summary
8 CO
8 CO
8 MT
8 ND
8 SD
8 UT
8 WY
Region 8 Summary
9 AZ
9 AZ
9 AZ
9 AZ
9 AZ
9 AZ
9 CA
9 CA
9 CA
9 CA
9 CA
9 NV
9 NV
Region 9 Summary
10 AK
10 ID
10 ID
10 OR
10 WA
Region 10 Summary
PQAO
1001
0017
0765
807
0812
905
920
1035
0613
0874
1080
0563
0588
0752
0816
0240
750
0730
0782
0973
1113
1188
0053
615
0643
780
0864
0865
0086
0145
577
0942
0972
0226
1138
0015
180
0511
0821
1136
Precision Completeness and Precision Estimates at PQAO Level
# Routine # Required
Sites Collocated Sites
15
2
8
1
7
1
1
15
66
2
2
9
10
11
3
4
41
13
2
13
4
7
9
8
56
6
1
3
1
2
3
14
38
1
10
20
3
1
103
4
1
7
19
8
39
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
13
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
9
3
1
2
1
2
2
1
12
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
1
2
3
1
1
25
1
1
2
3
1
8
70 Cornp ror »
# Actual CV Upper Samples at Site and
Collocated Sites Bound * PQAO
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
17
1
1
2
2
4
1
1
12
2
1
2
3
2
3
2
15
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
8
1
2
3
1
1
25
1
1
1
3
3
9
8.88
9.45
8.32
8.82
8.88
10.05
4.72
7.38
8.02
5.94
8.47
8.53
6.47
3.88
9.70
16.40
9.26
7.01
5.54
4.87
17.14
9.37
9.85
8.83
9.71
7.64
9.47
8.72
13.70
18.76
10.31
6.13
11.61
13.26
11.52
5.42
10.40
3.75
10.75
7.43
13.17
6.04
6.36
6.36
8.32
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
81%
97%
100%
100%
90%
100%
82%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
96%
100%
87%
100%
100%
86%
85%
90%
100%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
100%
67%
91%
92%
Regional CV estimate excludes large PQAO-level CV estimate.
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachments 4A, B, and C
2008-2010 PM2.5 Flow Rate Completeness of SLAMS and Tribal Monitors
with Aggregation by Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) and
Average Flow Rate % Difference by PQAO
Notes
The flow rate requirement is that every sampler (SLAMS or Tribal monitor) be audited 2 times a
year. The flow rate estimate for each site was based on the sampler start and end dates. If a site
was operating for the complete 3 years, then 6 audits are required and the completeness would be
based on the number of audits submitted divided by 6. For any samplers not operating for the 3-
year period the flow rate completeness would be based on the quarters the samplers operated
(start and end date).
The table provides estimates of the audits performed each year for each SLAM or Tribal site and
is also aggregated at the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) level. Missing spaces
in the table indicate that the sampler for the site had not operated in that year.
Since some PQAOs reported flow rate data under the SLAMS or Tribal monitor type for
samplers with pollutant occurrence codes (POCs) higher than POC-1, there are 2 tables attached.
Attachment 4A represents samplers listed as POC-1 and Attachment 4B represents samplers with
POCs greater than POC-1.
Table 4c provides an estimate of the average 3-year percent difference of all the flow rate audits
for a given PQAO. Ninety nine percent of the individual audits were within 5% of the design
value.
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
01 CT 0251 NCORE 090050005 1
01 CT 0251 NCORE 090090027 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090010010 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090011123 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090031003 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090032006 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090091123 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090092008 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090092123 1
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090113002 1
01 CT 0251 SPECIAL PURPOSE 090019003 1
01 CT 0251 SPECIAL PURPOSE 090050004 1
01 CT 0251 SPECIAL PURPOSE 090090026 1
01 CT All All Sites
01 MA 0660 NCORE 250250042 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250035001 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250051004 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250092006 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250095005 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250096001 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250130008 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250130016 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250132009 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250230004 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250250002 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250250027 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250250043 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250270016 1
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250270023 1
01 MA All All Sites
01 ME 0635 NCORE 230090103 1
01 ME 0635 SLAMS 230010011 1
01 ME 0635 SLAMS 230030013 1
01 ME 0635 SLAMS 230030014 1
01 ME 0635 SLAMS 230031011 1
01 ME 0635 SLAMS 230190002 1
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230031008 1
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230050029 1
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230172011 1
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230210004 1
01 ME All All Sites
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330012004 1
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330050007 1
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330090010 1
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330111015 1
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330131006 1
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330190003 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 3 100
1 2 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
95
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
88
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
100
100
94
Pagel
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
01 NH All All Sites
01 Rl 0907 NCORE 440071010 1
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440030002 1
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440070022 1
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440070026 1
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440070028 1
01 Rl All All Sites
01 VT 1119 NCORE 500070007 1
01 VT 1119 SLAMS 500030004 1
01 VT 1119 SLAMS 500070012 1
01 VT 1119 SLAMS 500210002 1
01 VT All All Sites
02 NJ 0764 NCORE 340130003 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340010006 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340011006 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340030003 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340070003 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340071007 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340130015 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340150004 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340171003 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340172002 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340210008 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340218001 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340230006 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340270004 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340273001 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340292002 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340310005 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340390004 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340390006 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340392003 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340410006 1
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340410007 1
02 NJ All All Sites
02 NY 0768 NCORE 360551007 1
02 NY 0768 NCORE 360810124 1
02 NY 0768 NCORE 361010003 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360010005 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360010012 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360050080 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360050110 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360050133 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360130011 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360290005 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360291007 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360310003 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 6 100
1 5 100
2 3 100
2 6 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 6 100
100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 14 100
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 11 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 14 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 2 100
200
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
80
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 10 100
2 15 100
2 12 100
2 17 100
2 8 100
2 13 100
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
70
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
100
2 11 100
2 13 100
2 15 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 14 100
2 7 100
2 15 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
3 Year
comp %
100
83
100
100
Page 2
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360470122 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360590008 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360610056 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360610079 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360610128 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360610134 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360632008 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360671015 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360710002 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360850055 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360850067 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 360893001 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 361030002 1
02 NY 0768 SLAMS 361191002 1
02 NY All All Sites
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 720010002 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 720530003 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 720570008 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 720590016 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 720610005 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 721130004 1
02 PR 0889 SLAMS 721270003 1
02 PR All All Sites
03 DC 0350 SLAMS 110010041 1
03 DC 0350 SLAMS 110010042 1
03 DC 0350 SLAMS 110010043 1
03 DC All All Sites
03 DE 0294 NCORE 100032004 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100010002 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100010003 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100031003 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100031007 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100031012 1
03 DE 0294 SLAMS 100051002 1
03 DE All All Sites
03 MD 1002 NCORE 240230002 3
03 MD 1002 NCORE 240330030 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240031003 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240051007 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240053001 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240150003 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240251001 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240290002 3
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240313001 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240330025 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
2 11 100
1 3 100
2 9 100
2 5 100
2 10 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 10 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
2 14 100
2 12 100
2 14 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 9 100
2 11 100
2 15 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
92
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
92
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 6 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 14 100
2 14 100
2 14 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
2 13 100
2 11 100
2 14 100
100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
57
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
1 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
100
83
100
97
Page3
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240338003 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240430009 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100006 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100007 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100008 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100035 1
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100040 1
03 MD All All Sites
03 PA 0021 NCORE 420030008 1
03 PA 0021 SLAMS 420030064 1
03 PA 0021 SLAMS 420030067 1
03 PA 0021 SLAMS 420031008 1
03 PA 0021 SLAMS 420031301 1
03 PA 0021 SPECIAL PURPOSE 420030002 3
03 PA 0021 SPECIAL PURPOSE 420030093 1
03 PA 0021 SPECIAL PURPOSE 420030095 1
03 PA 0021 SPECIAL PURPOSE 420033007 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420010001 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420010001 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420050001 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420070014 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420110011 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420170012 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420210011 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420270100 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420290100 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420410101 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420430401 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420430401 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420450002 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420450002 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420490003 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420490003 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420692006 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420692006 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420710007 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420850100 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420910013 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420950025 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420950025 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420950027 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421250005 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421250005 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421250200 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421255001 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
200
2 11 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
96
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 2 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
99
Page 4
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421255001 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421290008 1
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421290008 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 421330008 1
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010004 1
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010024 1
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010047 1
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010055 1
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010057 1
03 PA All All Sites
03 VA 1127 NCORE 510870014 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510030001 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510130020 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510360002 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510410003 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510590030 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510591005 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510595001 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510690010 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510870015 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 511071005 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 511390004 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 511650003 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 515100009 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 515200006 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 516500004 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 516500008 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 516800015 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517000013 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517100024 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517700014 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517700015 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517750011 1
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 518100008 1
03 VA All All Sites
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540030003 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540090005 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540090011 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540110006 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540291004 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540390010 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540391005 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540511002 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540610003 1
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540690010 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
93
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 9 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
95
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 6 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
97
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
95
100
Page5
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 541071002 1
03 WV 1150 SPECIAL PURPOSE 540330003 1
03 WV 1150 SPECIAL PURPOSE 540490006 1
03 WV 1150 SPECIAL PURPOSE 540810002 1
03 WV All All Sites
04 AL 0013 NCORE 010730023 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010030010 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010270001 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010331002 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010550010 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010690003 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010732003 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010735002 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010890014 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 010970003 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011010007 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011030011 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011130001 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011170006 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011210002 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011250004 1
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011270002 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010491003 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010550010 3
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010731005 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010731009 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010731010 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010732006 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010735003 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010972005 1
04 AL All All Sites
04 FL 1328 NCORE 120573002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120010023 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120010024 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120051004 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120090007 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120111002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120112004 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120113002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120115005 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120310098 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120310099 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120330004 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120570030 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120710005 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 16 100
2 16 100
2 13 100
2 17 100
2 14 100
2 14 100
2 16 100
2 9 100
2 8 100
2 14 100
2 14 100
2 15 100
2 18 100
2 14 100
2 13 100
2 15 100
2 15 100
2 12 100
2 10 100
2 9 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
2 10 100
2 15 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 17 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 17 100
2 11 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 11 100
2 13 100
2 9 100
2 10 100
2 11 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 17 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 18 100
2 9 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 11 100
2 9 100
2 8 100
2 9 100
2 10 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
100
100
Page 6
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120730012 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120814012 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120860033 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120861016 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120866001 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120951004 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120952002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120990009 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120992005 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121030018 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121031009 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121056006 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121111002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121150013 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121171002 1
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121275002 1
04 FL 1328 SPECIAL PURPOSE 120170005 1
04 FL 1328 SPECIAL PURPOSE 120310032 1
04 FL All All Sites
04 GA 0437 NCORE 130890002 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130210007 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130210012 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130510017 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130510091 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130590002 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130630091 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130670003 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130670004 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130892001 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130950007 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131150003 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131150005 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131210032 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131210039 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131210048 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131270006 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131350002 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131390003 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131530001 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131850003 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132150001 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132150008 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132150011 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132230003 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132450005 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
96
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
98
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
3 Year
comp %
98
Page 7
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132450091 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132950002 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 133030001 1
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 133190001 1
04 GA All All Sites
04 KY 0584 NCORE 211110067 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210190017 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210290006 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210373002 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210430500 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210470006 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210590005 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210670012 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210670014 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210730006 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210930006 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211010014 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211110043 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211110044 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211110048 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211110051 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211170007 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211451004 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211510003 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211950002 1
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 212270008 1
04 KY 0584 SPECIAL PURPOSE 210130002 1
04 KY 0584 SPECIAL PURPOSE 211830032 1
04 KY 0584 SPECIAL PURPOSE 211930003 1
04 KY 0584 SPECIAL PURPOSE 211990003 3
04 KY All All Sites
04 MS 0703 NCORE 280490019 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280010004 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280110001 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280330002 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280350004 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280430001 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280450003 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280470008 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280490010 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280590006 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280670002 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280750003 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280810005 1
04 MS 0703 SLAMS 280870001 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
96
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
200
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
94
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 9 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
1 1 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
2 1 50
97
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
97
99
PageS
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
04 MS All All Sites
04 NC 001 TRIBAL MONITORS 370990006 1
04 NC 0776 NCORE 371190041 1
04 NC 0776 NCORE 371830014 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370010002 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370210034 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370330001 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370350004 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370370004 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370510009 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370570002 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370610002 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370630015 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370650004 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370670022 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370670030 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370710016 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370810013 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370810014 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370870012 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371010002 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371070004 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371110004 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371170001 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371190042 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371190043 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371210001 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371230001 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371350007 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371470005 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371470006 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371550005 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371590021 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371730002 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371830020 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371890003 1
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371910005 1
04 NC 0776 SPECIAL PURPOSE 371290002 1
04 NC All All Sites
04 SC 0971 NCORE 450790007 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450130007 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450190049 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450250001 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450410002 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450450008 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
92
2 2 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
98
2 26 100
2 27 100
2 27 100
2 27 100
2 27 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
92
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
97
2 2 100
2 27 100
2 27 100
2 21 100
1 13 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 27 100
2 27 100
2 25 100
3 Year
comp %
95
98
Page 9
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450450009 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450450015 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450470003 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450510002 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450630008 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450730001 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450790019 1
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450830010 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450190048 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450190051 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450370001 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450410003 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450791001 1
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450830011 1
04 SC All All Sites
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470370023 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470370036 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470450004 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470654002 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470930028 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470931017 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470931020 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470990002 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471130006 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471251009 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471570014 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471570038 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471570047 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471571004 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471631007 1
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471650007 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470090011 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470650031 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470651011 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470931013 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470931017 2
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471050108 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471071002 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471192007 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471251011 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471410005 1
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 471450004 1
04 TN All All Sites
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170310022 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170310050 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 27 100
2 18 100
2 28 100
2 26 100
2 27 100
2 23 100
2 26 100
100
2 26 100
1 10 100
2 26 100
100
88
2 16 100
2 16 100
2 4 100
2 12 100
2 5 100
2 6 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 13 100
2 12 100
2 2 100
2 7 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 26 100
2 28 100
2 27 100
2 25 100
2 25 100
2 28 100
2 28 100
2 24 100
2 26 100
2 27 100
2 23 100
2 27 100
100
2 18 100
2 16 100
2 4 100
2 15 100
2 3 100
2 7 100
2 7 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 15 100
2 16 100
2 6 100
2 7 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 22 100
2 30 100
2 25 100
2 25 100
2 27 100
2 25 100
2 25 100
2 26 100
2 26 100
2 24 100
100
2 20 100
2 19 100
2 4 100
2 16 100
2 6 100
2 8 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 16 100
2 16 100
2 5 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
96
100
Page 10
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170310052 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170310057 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170310076 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170312001 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170313301 1
05 IL 0258 SLAMS 170316005 1
05 IL 0513 NCORE 170191001 1
05 IL 0513 NCORE 170314201 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170010007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170190004 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170311016 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170313103 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170314007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170434002 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170650002 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170831001 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170890003 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170890007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170971007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 170990007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171110001 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171132003 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171150013 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171190024 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171191007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171192009 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171193007 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171430037 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171570001 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171613002 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171630010 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171634001 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171670012 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171971002 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 171971011 1
05 IL 0513 SLAMS 172010013 1
05 IL All All Sites
05 IN 0520 NCORE 180970078 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180030004 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180190006 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180350006 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180370004 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180370005 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180372001 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180390008 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
92
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
98
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
97
Page 11
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180431004 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180650003 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180670003 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180830004 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890006 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890022 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890026 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890027 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890031 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180892004 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180892010 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180910011 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180950009 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180950011 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970043 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970066 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970081 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970083 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970084 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181050003 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181270024 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181410014 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181410015 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181470009 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181570008 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630006 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630012 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630016 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630020 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630021 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181670018 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181670023 1
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181830003 1
05 IN 0520 SPECIAL PURPOSE 180190008 1
05 IN 0520 SPECIAL PURPOSE 180510012 1
05 IN All All Sites
05 Ml 0685 NCORE 260810020 1
05 Ml 0685 NCORE 261630001 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260050003 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260170014 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260210014 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260490021 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260650012 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260770008 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260810007 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
1 1 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
94
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 3 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
98
Page 12
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260910007 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260990009 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261130001 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261150005 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261210040 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261250001 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261390005 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261470005 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261610008 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630015 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630016 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630019 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630025 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630033 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630036 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630038 1
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630039 1
05 Ml 0685 TRIBAL MONITORS 261010922 1
05 Ml All All Sites
05 MN 0700 NCORE 270031002 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 270370470 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 270530961 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 270530963 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 270531007 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 270532006 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271095008 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271230866 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271230868 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271230871 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271377001 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271377550 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271377551 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271390505 1
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271453052 1
05 MN 0700 SPECIAL PURPOSE 271630445 1
05 MN 0700 SPECIAL PURPOSE 271630446 1
05 MN 0700 TRIBAL MONITORS 270953051 1
05 MN All All Sites
05 OH 0012 SLAMS 391030003 1
05 OH 0012 SLAMS 391330002 1
05 OH 0012 SLAMS 391530017 1
05 OH 0012 SLAMS 391530023 1
05 OH 0151 SLAMS 391510017 1
05 OH 0151 SLAMS 391510020 1
05 OH 0220 SLAMS 390950024 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
1 1 100
200
2 3 100
76
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
90
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
100
89
Page 13
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 OH 0220 SLAMS 390950025 1
05 OH 0220 SLAMS 390950026 1
05 OH 0220 SLAMS 390950028 1
05 OH 0229 NCORE 390350060 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390350027 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390350034 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390350038 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390350045 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390350065 1
05 OH 0229 SLAMS 390351002 1
05 OH 0287 NCORE 391351001 1
05 OH 0287 SLAMS 390230005 1
05 OH 0287 SLAMS 390570005 1
05 OH 0287 SLAMS 391130032 1
05 OH 0595 SLAMS 390850007 1
05 OH 0595 SLAMS 390853002 1
05 OH 0634 SLAMS 390990005 1
05 OH 0634 SLAMS 390990014 1
05 OH 0634 SLAMS 391550005 1
05 OH 0634 SLAMS 391550007 1
05 OH 0805 SLAMS 390490024 1
05 OH 0805 SLAMS 390490025 1
05 OH 0805 SLAMS 390490029 3
05 OH 0805 SLAMS 390490081 1
05 OH 0807 SLAMS 390933002 1
05 OH 0808 SLAMS 390030009 1
05 OH 0809 SLAMS 390090003 1
05 OH 0809 SLAMS 390810017 1
05 OH 0809 SLAMS 390811001 1
05 OH 0880 SLAMS 390870012 1
05 OH 0880 SLAMS 391450013 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390170003 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390170016 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390250022 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390610006 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390610014 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390610040 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390610042 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390610043 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390617001 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 390618001 1
05 OH 1259 SLAMS 391650007 1
05 OH All All Sites
05 Wl 1175 NCORE 550270001 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550090005 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 7 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 7 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
97
2 11 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 5 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
100
2 12 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
97
2 11 100
2 11 100
3 Year
comp %
98
Page 14
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550250047 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550270007 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550430009 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550590019 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550630012 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550710007 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790010 2
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790026 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790043 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790058 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790059 2
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790099 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550870009 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550890009 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551091002 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551110007 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551198001 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551250001 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551330027 2
05 Wl 1175 SPECIAL PURPOSE 550350100 1
05 Wl 1175 TRIBAL MONITORS 550030010 1
05 Wl 1175 TRIBAL MONITORS 550410007 1
05 Wl All All Sites
06 AR 0055 NCORE 051190007 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050010011 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050030005 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050350005 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050450002 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050510003 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050670001 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051070001 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051130002 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051150003 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051191004 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051191008 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051310008 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051390006 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051430005 1
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051450001 1
06 AR All All Sites
06 LA 1001 NCORE 220330009 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220170008 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220190009 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220190010 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220331001 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
1 2 100
2 9 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 10 100
2 12 100
2 13 100
95
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
200
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 11 100
95
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 8 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
97
100
Page 15
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220470005 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220470009 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220511001 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220512001 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220550006 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220550007 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220730004 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 221050001 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 221090001 1
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 221210001 1
06 LA 1001 SPECIAL PURPOSE 220790002 1
06 LA 1001 SPECIAL PURPOSE 220870007 1
06 LA All All Sites
06 NM 0017 NCORE 350010023 1
06 NM 0017 SLAMS 350010024 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350050005 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350130017 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350130025 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350171002 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350250008 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350431003 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350450006 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350450019 1
06 NM 0765 SLAMS 350490020 1
06 NM All All Sites
06 OK 807 TRIBAL MONITORS 400159008 1
06 OK 0812 NCORE 401431127 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 400970186 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401010169 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401090035 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401091037 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401210415 1
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401430110 1
06 OK 905 PROPOSED NCORE 400019009 1
06 OK 905 TRIBAL MONITORS 401359015 1
06 OK 920 TRIBAL MONITORS 401159004 1
06 OK All All Sites
06 TX 1035 NCORE 481130069 1
06 TX 1035 NCORE 481410044 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 480370004 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 481130087 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 481350003 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 481410037 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 482010058 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 482011035 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
86
2 5 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
2 10 100
86
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 1 50
85
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 7 100
90
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 5 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
100
90
92
Page 16
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 482150043 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 483550032 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 483611001 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 483750320 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 484391002 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 484391006 1
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 484530021 2
06 TX 1035 SPECIAL PURPOSE 480290032 1
06 TX 1035 SPECIAL PURPOSE 480290059 1
06 TX 1035 SPECIAL PURPOSE 481390016 5
06 TX 1035 SPECIAL PURPOSE 482030002 1
06 TX All All Sites
07 IA 0613 SLAMS 191130037 1
07 IA 0613 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191130040 1
07 IA 0874 SLAMS 191530030 1
07 IA 0874 SLAMS 191532510 1
07 IA 1080 NCORE 191630015 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 190130008 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191032001 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191370002 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191390015 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191471002 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191630019 1
07 IA 1080 SLAMS 191770006 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 190130009 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 190450019 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 190450021 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 190550001 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191110008 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191390016 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191390018 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191550009 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191630018 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191630020 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191710007 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191930017 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191930019 1
07 IA 1080 SPECIAL PURPOSE 191970004 1
07 IA All All Sites
07 KS 0563 NCORE 202090021 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 200910007 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 200910010 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201070002 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201730008 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201730009 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 5 100
2 6 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 4 100
2 4 100
91
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
200
2 4 100
92
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
100
94
Page 17
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201730010 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201770013 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 201910002 1
07 KS 0563 SLAMS 202090022 1
07 KS All All Sites
07 MO 0588 NCORE 295100085 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290210005 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290210005 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290370003 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290370003 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290390001 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290470005 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290470005 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290770032 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290950034 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290950034 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290990019 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290990019 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 291860006 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 291890015 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 291892003 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 291893001 3
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 295100007 1
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 295100093 1
07 MO 0588 SPECIAL PURPOSE 295100087 1
07 MO All All Sites
07 NE 0752 SLAMS 310790004 1
07 NE 0752 SLAMS 311090022 1
07 NE 0752 SLAMS 311570003 1
07 NE 0752 SLAMS 311570004 1
07 NE 0816 NCORE 310550019 1
07 NE 0816 NCORE 310550019 3
07 NE 0816 SLAMS 310550052 1
07 NE 0816 SLAMS 311530007 1
07 NE 0816 SLAMS 311530007 3
07 NE 0816 SLAMS 311770002 1
07 NE All All Sites
08 CO 0240 NCORE 080310025 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080010006 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080050005 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080130003 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080130012 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080310002 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080390001 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080410011 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
100
100
1 1 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
60
2 3 100
2 3 100
1 1 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
94
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year
comp %
100
87
98
Page 18
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080410017 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080690009 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080770017 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 081010012 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 081010015 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 081230006 1
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 081230008 1
08 CO 0240 SPECIAL PURPOSE 080310023 1
08 CO 0240 SPECIAL PURPOSE 080350004 1
08 CO 0240 SPECIAL PURPOSE 080830006 1
08 CO 750 TRIBAL MONITORS 080677001 1
08 CO 750 TRIBAL MONITORS 080677003 1
08 CO All All Sites
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300131026 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300290007 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300290009 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300290047 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300310006 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300310008 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300310016 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300310016 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300490018 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300490026 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300490026 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300530018 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300630024 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300630031 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300630037 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300750001 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300810007 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300870001 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300890007 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300930005 1
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 301111065 1
08 MT 0730 SPECIAL PURPOSE 300310013 1
08 MT 0730 SPECIAL PURPOSE 300310018 1
08 MT 0730 SPECIAL PURPOSE 300630021 1
08 MT All All Sites
08 ND 0782 NCORE 380171004 1
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380070002 1
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380150003 1
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380570004 1
08 ND All All Sites
08 SD 0973 NCORE 460990008 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460110002 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
200
94
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
95
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 5 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
94
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
1 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
97
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
100
2 6 100
2 6 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
97
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
78
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
2 4 100
75
2 6 100
2 6 100
3 Year
comp %
95
90
92
Page 19
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460130003 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460290002 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460330132 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460710001 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460990006 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 461030020 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 461031001 1
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 461270002 1
08 SD 0973 SPECIAL PURPOSE 461270001 3
08 SD All All Sites
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490050004 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490110004 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490350003 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490353006 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490353007 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490353010 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490490002 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490494001 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490570002 1
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490571003 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490030003 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490351001 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490353008 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490450003 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490495008 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490495010 1
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490570007 1
08 UT All All Sites
08 WY 0527 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560051899 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560010006 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560131003 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560210001 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560250001 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560290001 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560330002 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560330003 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560370007 1
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560391006 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560050891 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560050892 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560050899 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560090819 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560350101 1
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560350705 1
08 WY All All Sites
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 4 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 4 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 4 100
100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 2 100
2 3 100
96
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 9 100
2 6 100
2 3 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
82
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
96
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 6 100
2 9 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
82
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
3 Year
comp %
100
88
97
Page 20
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
09 AZ 0053 NCORE 040139997 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040031005 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040051008 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040230004 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040252002 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040270004 1
09 AZ 0053 SLAMS 040278011 1
09 AZ 615 SLAMS 040137020 1
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040130019 1
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040131003 1
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040134003 1
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040139812 3
09 AZ 0864 NCORE 040191028 1
09 AZ 0864 SLAMS 040190011 1
09 AZ 0865 SLAMS 040210001 1
09 AZ 0865 SLAMS 040213002 1
09 AZ 0865 SPECIAL PURPOSE 040213013 1
09 AZ All All Sites
09 CA 0086 NCORE 060850005 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060010007 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060010009 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060010009 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060011001 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060011001 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060130002 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060333001 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060410001 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060531003 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060690002 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060750005 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060750005 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060811001 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060811001 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060850002 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060850002 3
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060870007 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060950004 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060970003 1
09 CA 0086 SLAMS 060970003 3
09 CA 0145 NCORE 060190008 1
09 CA 0145 NCORE 060670006 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060070002 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060090001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060090001 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060111002 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
200
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
90
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 1 50
200
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
96
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 3 100
1 1 100
2 5 100
100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
96
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 3 100
100
2 1 50
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
94
Page 21
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060195001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060195025 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060231002 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060271003 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060290010 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060290014 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060290016 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060310004 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060311004 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060379033 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060392010 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060452002 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060472510 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060531003 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060570005 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060571001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060610006 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060631006 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060631009 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060670010 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060674001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060690002 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060710306 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060771002 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060771002 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060792004 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060792006 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060798001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060830011 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060830011 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060831008 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060831008 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060870007 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060890004 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060932001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060990005 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060990005 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060990006 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061010003 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061072002 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061110007 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061110009 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061112002 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061113001 1
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061131003 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
200
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
100
2 1 50
100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
2 1 50
2 5 100
200
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 1 50
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
200
200
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
Page 22
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
09 CA 0145 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060192009 3
09 CA 0145 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060231004 1
09 CA 586 TRIBAL MONITORS 060650009 1
09 CA 0942 NCORE 060730003 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060250005 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060250007 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060251003 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060290011 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060290015 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060730001 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060730006 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060731002 1
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060731010 1
09 CA 0972 NCORE 060371103 1
09 CA 0972 NCORE 060658001 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060370002 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371002 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371201 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371301 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371302 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371602 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060372005 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060374002 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060374004 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060590007 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060592022 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060651003 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060652002 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060655001 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060658005 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060710025 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060712002 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060718001 1
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060719004 1
09 CA All All Sites
09 HI 0481 PROPOSED NCORE 150030010 1
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150031001 1
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150031001 3
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150031004 1
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150031004 2
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150032004 1
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150032004 4
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150090006 1
09 HI 0481 SLAMS 150090006 2
09 HI 0481 SPECIAL PURPOSE 150011006 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
57
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
200
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 5 100
200
2 1 50
200
200
200
200
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
64
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
200
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
83
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
3 Year
comp %
68
Page 23
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
09 HI 0481 SPECIAL PURPOSE 150011012 1
09 HI 0481 SPECIAL PURPOSE 150012016 1
09 HI 0481 SPECIAL PURPOSE 150012017 1
09 HI 0481 SPECIAL PURPOSE 150012020 1
09 HI All All Sites
09 NV 0226 SLAMS 320030561 1
09 NV 0226 SLAMS 320031019 1
09 NV 0226 SLAMS 320032002 1
09 NV 1138 NCORE 320310016 1
09 NV All All Sites
10 AK 0015 SLAMS 020200018 1
10 AK 0015 SLAMS 020900010 1
10 AK 0015 SLAMS 021100004 3
10 AK 0015 SLAMS 021700008 1
10 AK 0015 SPECIAL PURPOSE 021100004 1
10 AK 0015 SPECIAL PURPOSE 021700012 3
10 AK 0732 SPECIAL PURPOSE 020200052 3
10 AK 0732 SPECIAL PURPOSE 020201004 3
10 AK All All Sites
10 ID 180 TRIBAL MONITORS 160050020 1
10 ID 180 TRIBAL MONITORS 160770011 3
10 ID 0511 NCORE 160010010 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160010011 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160090010 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160270002 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160270004 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160410001 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160590004 1
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160790017 1
10 ID All All Sites
10 OR 0821 NCORE 410510080 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410130100 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410170120 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410250002 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410250003 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410290133 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410291001 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410330114 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410350004 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410370001 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410390058 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410390060 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410391009 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410392013 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410399004 1
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
200
200
50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
87
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
94
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 5 100
100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
1 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
200
200
200
2 1 50
200
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
81
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 4 100
2 4 100
93
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
200
2 2 100
2 2 100
78
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year
comp %
77
100
93
91
Page 24
-------
Attachment 4A. PM2 5 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POC-1 Monitors Only
Region | State 1 PQAO 1 Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410510246 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410590121 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410610119 1
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410670004 1
10 OR All All Sites
10 WA 124 TRIBAL MONITORS 530770015 1
10 WA 1136 NCORE 530330080 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530030004 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530110013 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530330057 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530530029 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530610020 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530611007 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530630016 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530630021 1
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530770009 1
10 WA 1136 TRIBAL MONITORS 530470013 1
10 WA 1136 TRIBAL MONITORS 530770016 1
10 WA All All Sites
2008 1 2O08 1 2008 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
88
1 1 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 3 100
95
2O09 1 2O09 1 2009 %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
52
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
90
ZU1U 1 ZU1U 1 ZU1U %
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
92
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 1 100
100
3 Year
comp %
77
95
Page 25
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
01 CT 0251 SLAMS 090090027 2
01 CT All All Sites
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250130008 2
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250230004 2
01 MA 0660 SLAMS 250250043 2
01 MA All All Sites
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230031008 2
01 ME 0635 SPECIAL PURPOSE 230050029 2
01 ME All All Sites
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330012004 2
01 NH 0762 SLAMS 330131006 2
01 NH All All Sites
01 Rl 0907 NCORE 440071010 2
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440030002 2
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440030002 3
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440070022 2
01 Rl 0907 SLAMS 440070026 2
01 Rl All All Sites
01 VT 1119 SLAMS 500070012 2
01 VT All All Sites
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340070003 2
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340171003 2
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340390004 2
02 NJ 0764 SLAMS 340390004 3
02 NJ All All Sites
03 DC 0350 SLAMS 110010041 2
03 DC All All Sites
03 DE 0294 NCORE 100032004 2
03 DE 0294 NCORE 100032004 3
03 DE All All Sites
03 MD 1002 NCORE 240330030 2
03 MD 1002 NCORE 240330030 3
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240150003 3
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240313001 3
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240338003 2
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 240430009 3
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100035 2
03 MD 1002 SLAMS 245100040 3
03 MD All All Sites
03 PA 0021 SLAMS 420030064 2
03 PA 0021 NCORE 420030008 2
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420210011 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420410101 3
03 PA 0851 SLAMS 420710007 2
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010004 2
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010047 4
03 PA 0861 SLAMS 421010057 4
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
0
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
100
1 1 100
2 1 50
50
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 7 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 7 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 1 50
2 14 100
2 2 100
100
62
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
100
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
1 1 100
2 3 100
2 14 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 1 50
75
1 1 100
1 4 100
1 4 100
1 4 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
1 3 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
3 Year comp
%
67
100
100
100
71
100
100
100
92
100
Page 26
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
03 PA All All Sites
03 VA 1127 NCORE 510870014 2
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 510130020 2
03 VA 1127 SLAMS 517100024 2
03 VA All All Sites
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540090011 2
03 WV 1150 SLAMS 540110006 2
03 WV All All Sites
04 AL 0013 SLAMS 011011002 1
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010331002 3
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 010690003 3
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 011011002 3
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 011030011 3
04 AL 0013 SPECIAL PURPOSE 011250004 3
04 AL All All Sites
04 FL 1328 NCORE 120573002 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120010023 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120111002 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120310099 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120330004 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120570030 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120710005 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120730012 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120861016 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120952002 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120990009 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 120992005 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121030018 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121056006 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121111002 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121150013 2
04 FL 1328 SLAMS 121171002 2
04 FL 1328 SPECIAL PURPOSE 120170005 2
04 FL 1328 SPECIAL PURPOSE 120990008 3
04 FL All All Sites
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130210007 2
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 130890002 2
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 131210032 2
04 GA 0437 SLAMS 132450005 2
04 GA All All Sites
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 210930006 2
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211010014 2
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 211950002 2
04 KY 0584 SLAMS 212270008 2
04 KY 0584 SPECIAL PURPOSE 210373002 3
04 KY All All Sites
04 NC 001 TRIBAL MONITORS 370990006 2
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
91
2 3 100
100
2 2 100
66
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
87
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
200
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
83
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 2 100
2 2 100
100
100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
75
2 4 100
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
94
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
100
2 4 100
3 Year comp
%
96
100
100
92
95
89
92
Page 27
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
04 NC 0776 NCORE 371830014 2
04 NC 0776 NCORE 371830014 3
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370210034 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370350004 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370670022 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370670022 3
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370670030 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 370810013 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371110004 2
04 NC 0776 SLAMS 371190042 2
04 NC 0776 SPECIAL PURPOSE 371230001 2
04 NC All All Sites
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450450009 2
04 SC 0971 SLAMS 450790019 2
04 SC 0971 SPECIAL PURPOSE 450190048 2
04 SC All All Sites
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470370023 2
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 470654002 2
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471130006 2
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471570047 2
04 TN 1025 SLAMS 471650007 2
04 TN 1025 SPECIAL PURPOSE 470650031 2
04 TN All All Sites
05 IN 0520 PROPOSED NCORE 180970078 3
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180431004 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180890031 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 180970081 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181410015 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181570008 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630006 2
05 IN 0520 SLAMS 181630020 2
05 IN All All Sites
05 Ml 0685 NCORE 260810020 2
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 260770008 2
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261610008 2
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630001 2
05 Ml 0685 SLAMS 261630033 2
05 Ml All All Sites
05 MN 0700 SLAMS 271230866 2
05 MN All All Sites
05 OH 0012 SLAMS 391530017 3
05 OH All All Sites
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550090005 2
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550250041 1
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 550790026 2
05 Wl 1175 SLAMS 551110007 2
05 Wl 1175 TRIBAL MONITORS 550030010 2
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
1 2 100
200
200
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
80
2 27 100
2 26 100
2 23 100
100
2 16 100
2 12 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
200
83
2 4 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
1 1 100
100
2 27 100
2 28 100
2 27 100
100
2 16 100
2 13 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 15 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
1 1 100
2 3 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 5 100
200
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 4 100
2 6 100
90
2 24 100
2 26 100
2 24 100
100
2 19 100
2 17 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
100
2 11 100
2 9 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
2 12 100
3 Year comp
%
90
100
94
100
100
100
100
Page 28
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
05 Wl 1175 TRIBAL MONITORS 550410007 2
05 Wl All All Sites
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050010011 2
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 050450002 2
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051190007 2
06 AR 0055 SLAMS 051310008 2
06 AR All All Sites
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220170008 2
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 220330009 2
06 LA 1001 SLAMS 221050001 2
06 LA All All Sites
06 NM 0017 NCORE 350010023 2
06 NM All All Sites
06 OK 807 TRIBAL MONITORS 400159008 2
06 OK 0812 SLAMS 401090035 2
06 OK 905 NCORE 400019009 2
06 OK 905 TRIBAL MONITORS 401359015 2
06 OK 920 TRIBAL MONITORS 401159004 2
06 OK All All Sites
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 481130069 2
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 482011035 2
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 483550032 2
06 TX 1035 SLAMS 484391002 2
06 TX All All Sites
07 KS 0563 NCORE 202090021 2
07 KS All All Sites
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 290950034 2
07 MO 0588 SLAMS 295100085 2
07 MO All All Sites
07 NE 0752 SLAMS 311090022 2
07 NE 0816 SLAMS 310550019 2
07 NE All All Sites
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080010006 2
08 CO 0240 SLAMS 080310002 2
08 CO 750 TRIBAL MONITORS 080677001 2
08 CO All All Sites
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300290009 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300290047 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300490018 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300810007 3
08 MT 0730 SLAMS 300930005 3
08 MT All All Sites
08 ND 0782 NCORE 380171004 3
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380150003 2
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380150003 3
08 ND 0782 SLAMS 380570004 3
08 ND All All Sites
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 12 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
200
200
200
0
2 3 100
100
2 6 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 10 100
87
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
1 1 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
1 2 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 13 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 3 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 7 100
80
2 5 100
2 5 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 1 50
2 2 100
75
2 3 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
83
1 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
200
50
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 6 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
100
2 5 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
62
2 2 100
2 4 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
3 Year comp
%
100
100
67
100
89
100
100
92
100
94
87
83
Page 29
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
08 SD 0973 NCORE 460990008 3
08 SD 0973 SLAMS 460710001 3
08 SD 0973 SPECIAL PURPOSE 460330132 3
08 SD 0973 SPECIAL PURPOSE 461030020 3
08 SD 0973 SPECIAL PURPOSE 461270002 3
08 SD All All Sites
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490353010 2
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490494001 2
08 UT 1113 SLAMS 490570007 2
08 UT 1113 SPECIAL PURPOSE 490050004 2
08 UT All All Sites
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560210001 2
08 WY 1188 SLAMS 560330002 2
08 WY 1188 SPECIAL PURPOSE 560050891 2
08 WY All All Sites
09 AZ 615 SLAMS 040137020 2
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040130019 2
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040130019 3
09 AZ 0643 SLAMS 040134003 3
09 AZ 0865 SLAMS 040210001 2
09 AZ All All Sites
09 CA 0145 NCORE 060190008 2
09 CA 0145 NCORE 060670006 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060271003 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060290014 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060450006 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060571001 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060710306 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060798001 2
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 060798001 3
09 CA 0145 SLAMS 061110007 2
09 CA 0145 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060195001 3
09 CA 0145 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060310004 3
09 CA 0145 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060771002 4
09 CA 586 TRIBAL MONITORS 060650009 2
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060250005 2
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060730006 2
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060731002 3
09 CA 0942 SLAMS 060731002 4
09 CA 0972 NCORE 060371103 3
09 CA 0972 NCORE 060658001 3
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060371103 2
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060374002 3
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060652002 2
09 CA 0972 SLAMS 060658001 2
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
25
2 2 100
2 1 50
75
2 4 100
2 1 50
75
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
2 1 50
100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
100
100
200
200
200
200
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
2 3 100
100
2 9 100
2 9 100
200
2 9 100
75
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
83
2 4 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
83
2 2 100
2 1 50
200
2 2 100
200
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
200
2 1 50
200
200
2 1 50
200
200
200
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
2 4 100
100
2 12 100
2 12 100
200
2 12 100
75
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
2 4 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 3 100
2 2 100
90
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 3 100
2 1 50
200
2 3 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
1 1 100
1 1 100
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
3 Year comp
%
100
58
86
83
Page 30
-------
Attachment 4B. PM25 Flow Rate Completeness, 2008-2010 POCs greater than POC-1
Region I State I PQAO I Monitor Type | Site ID | POC
09 CA 0972 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060371002 3
09 CA 0972 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060590007 3
09 CA 0972 SPECIAL PURPOSE 060658005 3
09 CA All All Sites
09 NV 0226 SLAMS 320030561 2
09 NV 1138 NCORE 320310016 2
09 NV All All Sites
10 AK 0015 SLAMS 020900010 2
10 AK 0732 SPECIAL PURPOSE 020200018 3
10 AK All All Sites
10 ID 180 TRIBAL MONITORS 160050020 2
10 ID 180 TRIBAL MONITORS 160050020 3
10 ID 0511 NCORE 160010010 3
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160790017 2
10 ID 0511 SLAMS 160790017 4
10 ID 0511 SPECIAL PURPOSE 160090010 3
10 ID 0511 SPECIAL PURPOSE 160270002 3
10 ID 0511 SPECIAL PURPOSE 160590004 3
10 ID 0511 SPECIAL PURPOSE 160790017 3
10 ID All All Sites
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410290133 2
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410390060 2
10 OR 0821 SLAMS 410670004 2
10 OR All All Sites
10 WA 1136 NCORE 530330080 3
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530330057 2
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530610020 3
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530630016 2
10 WA 1136 SLAMS 530630021 2
10 WA All All Sites
2008 1 2008 1 2008%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
200
200
200
27
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
200
0
2 4 100
100
200
200
0
2 2 100
2 2 100
100
2009 1 2009 1 2009%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 1 50
43
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 3 100
100
1 1 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
1 1 100
2 1 50
80
200
200
0
2 2 100
100
2 2 100
66
2010 1 2010 1 2010%
Required 1 Submitted 1 Complete
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
83
2 3 100
2 4 100
100
2 2 100
2 4 100
100
1 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 1 50
2 2 100
2 2 100
2 2 100
94
2 2 100
2 2 100
1 1 100
100
2 2 100
1 1 100
2 2 100
100
3 Year comp
%
51
100
67
91
33
89
Page 31
-------
Table 4c Flow Rate Average Percent Difference by PQAO (acceptance criteria is < 4% of standard and < 5% of design value)
Region
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
State
CT
MA
ME
NH
Rl
VT
NJ
NY
PR
DC
DE
MD
PA
PA
PA
VA
WV
AL
FL
GA
KY
MS
NC
NC
SC
TN
IL
IL
IN
Ml
MN
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Wl
AR
LA
NM
NM
OK
OK
OK
OK
TX
PQAO
0251
0660
0635
0762
0907
1119
0764
0768
0889
0350
0294
1002
0021
0851
0861
1127
1150
0013
1328
0437
0584
0703
001
0776
0971
1025
0258
0513
0520
0685
0700
0012
0151
0220
0229
0287
0595
0634
0805
0807
0808
0809
0880
1259
1175
0055
1001
0017
0765
807
0812
905
920
1035
Agency Name
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
Mass Dept Environmental Protection-Div Air Quality Control
Maine D.E.P. Bureau Of Air Quality Control, Augusta
New Hampshire Air Resources Agency
Rhode Island DEM And DOH
Vermont Agency Of Environmental Conservation
New Jersey State Department Of Environmental Protection
New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation
Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board
District Dept of Environment, Air Quality Div - DDOE/AQD
Delaware Dept Natural Resources and Environmental Control
State Of Maryland Air Management Administration
Allegheny County,PA Health Department
Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection
Philadelphia Air Management Services
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission
Al Dept Of Env Mgt
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
Georgia Air Protection Branch Ambient Monitoring Program
Kentucky Division For Air Quality
Mississippi DEQ, Office Of Pollution
Eastern Band Of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina
North Carolina Dept Of Environment And Natural Resources
South Carolina Department Health And Environmental Control
Tennessee Division Of Air Pollution Control
Cook County Department of Environmental Control
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Indiana Depart Of Environ Management/Office Of Air Quality
Michigan Dept Of Environmental Quality-Air Quality Division
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Division Of Air Quality
Akron Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
Canton City Health Department Air Pollution Control
City of Toledo, Environmental Services Division
Cleveland Air Pollution Control Agency
Dayton Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
Lake County Health Department Division Air Pollution Control
Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency
Ohio EPA, Central District Office
Ohio EPA, Northeast District Office
Ohio EPA, Northwest District Office
Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office
Portsmouth City Health Dept Division Air Pollution Control
Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services
Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section
Arkansas Department Of Environmental Quality
State Of Louisiana
Albuquerque Environmental Health And Energy Department
New Mexico Environment Department
Delaware Nation, OK
Oklahoma Dept. Of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division
Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma
Quapaw Tribe of Indians, OK
Texas Commission On Environmental Quality
Average %
Difference
-0.384
0.042
-0.354
0.825
0.122
-0.491
-0.087
-0.097
-0.259
-0.203
0.275
0.083
-0.709
-0.491
-0.163
0.050
-0.515
-0.285
0.434
-0.781
-0.178
-1.308
-0.159
-0.024
-0.094
-0.144
-0.102
0.181
0.137
-0.735
-0.210
-1.155
-0.359
0.287
1.570
-0.088
1.033
-0.657
0.344
-0.869
-1.057
-1.417
0.310
-0.380
-0.183
-0.130
-0.513
0.050
-0.387
-0.364
0.033
0.121
0.180
-0.112
Page 32
-------
Table 4c Flow Rate Average Percent Difference by PQAO (acceptance criteria is < 4% of standard and < 5% of design value)
Region
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
State
IA
IA
IA
KS
MO
NE
NE
CO
CO
MT
ND
SD
UT
WY
WY
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
HI
NV
NV
AK
AK
ID
ID
OR
WA
WA
PQAO
0613
0874
1080
0563
0588
0752
0816
0240
750
0730
0782
0973
1113
0527
1188
0053
615
0643
0864
0865
0086
0145
586
0942
0972
0481
0226
1138
0015
0732
180
0511
0821
124
1136
Average %
Agency Name Difference
Linn County Health Department -0.352
Polk County Physical Planning -0.565
University Hygenic Laboratory 0.065
Kansas Department Of Health And Environment -0.434
Missouri Laboratory Services Program 0.143
Nebraska Department Of Environmental Control 0.254
Omaha-Douglas County Health Department 0.171
Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment -0.101
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation, CO 1.705
Mt Dept Of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division -0.163
North Dakota State Department Of Health 0.146
South Dakota Dept Environmental Protection Air Quality Prog 0.287
Utah Department Of Environmental Quality -0.687
Inter-Mountain Laboratory Sheridan, WY 0.254
Wyoming Air Quality Division, Dept Of Environmental Quality 1.237
Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality -0.082
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of Salt River Reservation, i -0.375
Maricopa County Air Quality 0.189
Pima County Health Department 0.769
Pinal County APCD 0.191
Bay Area Air Quality Management District -0.224
California Air Resources Board -0.224
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of Pechanga Reservation, Cf 1.079
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District 0.870
South Coast Air Quality Management District 0.077
Hawaii State Department Of Health -0.028
Clark County, NV DAQEM -1.127
Washoe County District Health Department -0.112
Alaska Department Of Environmental Conservation -0.148
Municipality Of Anchorage Air Pollution Control Agency 1.398
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall Reservation of Idaho -0.327
Idaho Department Of Health And Welfare-Environment Division 0.977
Oregon Department Of Environmental Quality -0.668
Confederated Tribes & Bands of Yakama Nations, WA 1.153
Washington State Department Of Ecology -0.258
Page 33
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachments 5A and B
2008-2010 PM2.5 Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)
Completeness Aggregated by PQAO
and 3-Year Bias Estimate
Notes:
PEP completeness is based upon sites active at the time that audits are planned for a particular
year. It is based on the requirement that PQAOs with 5 or fewer routine sites are required to
conduct 5 audits and PQAOs with more than 5 routine sites are required to conduct 8 audits
(2007 monitoring regulation).
Completeness is based on all valid pairs collected by the PEP program. Completeness assesses
all valid pairs, regardless of the concentrations for either value of the pair. On the other hand,
bias estimates are based only on valid paired PEP and primary values for which both values are >
3 ug/m3.
Values in tan represent cases where the numbers of valid PEP/routine pairs is less than 75% of
that required or bias estimates that exceed the goal of (bias < 10%.
Attachment 5 A excludes Special Purpose monitors from the counts and bias estimates and
Attachment 5B includes these monitor types. See Attachment 6 for a description of the handling
of monitor types.
-------
Page intentionally left blank
-------
Attachment 5a. Bias assessment with all valid PEP/Primary pairs included in completeness but only pairs >= 3 ug/m3 included in bias estimates.
Reg State PQAO PQAO Name
1 CT 0251 Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
1 MA 0660 Mass Dept Environmental Protection-Div Air Quality Control
1 ME 0635 Maine D.E. P. Bureau Of Air Quality Control, Augusta
1 NH 0762 New Hampshire Air Resources Agency
1 Rl 0907 Rhode Island DEM And DOH
1 VT 1119 Vermont Agency Of Environmental Conservation
2 NJ 0764 New Jersey State Department Of Environmental Protection
2 NY 0768 New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation
2 PR 0889 Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board
2 VI 1124 Virgin Islands Department Of Planning & Natural Resources
3 DC 0350 District Dept of Environment, Air Quality Div- DDOE/AQD
3 DE 0294 Delaware Dept Natural Resources and Environmental Control
3 MD 1002 State Of Maryland Air Management Adminis
3 PA 0021 Allegheny County.PA Health Department
3 PA 0851 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection
3 PA 0861 Philadelphia Air Management Services
3 VA 1127 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
3 WV 1150 West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission
4 AL 0013 Al Dept Of Env Mgt
4 FL 1328 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
4 GA 0437 Georgia Air Protection Branch Ambient Monitoring Program
4 KY 0584 Kentucky Division For Air Quality
4 MS 0703 Mississippi DEQ, Office Of Pollution
4 NC 001 Eastern Band Of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina
4 NC 0776 North Carolina Dept Of Environment And Natural Resources
4 SC 0971 South Carolina Department Health And Environmental Control
4 TN 1025 Tennessee Division Of Air Pollution Control
5 IL 0258 Cook County Department of Environmental Control
5 IL 0513 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
5 IN 0520 Indiana Depart Of Environ Management/Office Of Air Quality
5 Ml 0685 Michigan Dept Of Environmental Quality-Air Quality Division
5 Ml W44 Inter-tribal Council of Michigan, Inc.
5 MN 407 Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, MN (Leech Lake Band)
5 MN 0700 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Division of Air Quality
5 OH 0012 Akron Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0151 Canton City Health Department Air Pollution Contro
5 OH 0220 City of Toledo, Environmental Services Division
5 OH 0229 Cleveland Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0287 Dayton Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0595 Lake County Health Department Division Air Pollution Control
5 OH 0634 Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0805 Ohio EPA, Central District Office
5 OH 0807 Ohio EPA, Northeast District Office
5 OH 0809 Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office
5 OH 0880 Portsmouth City Health Dept Division Air Pollution Control
5 OH 1259 Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services
5 Wl 1175 Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section
6 AR 0055 Arkansas Department Of Environmental Quality
6 LA 1001 State Of Louisiana
6 NM 0017 Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, Air Quality Division
6 NM 0765 New Mexico Environment Department
6 OK 807 Delaware Nation, OK
6 OK 0812 Oklahoma Dept. Of Environmental Quality
6 OK 905 Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma
6 OK 920 Quapaw Tribe of Indians, OK
6 TX 1035 Texas Commission On Environmental Quality
7 IA 0613 Linn County Health Department
2008
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 7
15 8 8
556
689
686
455
20 8 6
26 8 4
10 8 6
150
355
789
15 8 7
553
21 8 5
554
21 8 5
11 8 9
17 8 8
29 8 8
29 8 5
20 8 7
13 8 6
150
35 8 3
16 8 6
16 8 8
885
30 8 22
35 8 12
27 8 7
350
151
15 8 4
455
253
453
788
455
155
354
353
151
353
355
11 8 7
21 8 7
16 8 8
15 8 8
254
984
151
785
550
150
15 8 3
252
2009
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 7
15 8 7
684
554
554
455
21 8 9
25 8 7
10 8 5
151
355
787
15 8 8
552
31 8 4
558
22 8 8
11 8 5
17 8 8
30 8 8
30 8 8
21 8 7
14 8 8
155
36 8 9
13 8 5
15 8 7
883
30 8 14
39 8 10
27 8 10
450
150
15 8 7
555
255
355
788
455
255
254
353
151
353
255
11 8 8
23 8 10
16 8 6
15 8 9
255
988
150
787
250
150
15 8 6
253
2010
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 6
15 8 9
685
556
553
456
22 8 8
25 8 8
10 8 6
150
354
787
20 8 6
558
25 8 8
688
24 8 8
11 8 7
15 8 6
31 8 8
30 8 8
21 8 5
14 8 8
155
36 8 8
12 8 6
15 8 8
8 8 10
30 8 11
41 8 8
27 8 8
452
150
15 8 8
555
255
355
688
455
255
355
454
151
353
255
11 8 8
24 8 6
16 8 8
15 8 10
256
988
153
789
252
152
15 8 5
253
3-Year
Valid
Required Pairs %Comp
24 20 83%
24 24 100%
21 15 71%
IS 19 100%
IS 13 72%
15 16 100%
24 23 96%
24 19 79%
24 17 71%
15 1 7%
15 14 93%
24 23 96%
24 21 88%
15 13 87%
24 17 71%
IS 20 100%
24 21 88%
24 21 88%
24 22 92%
24 24 100%
24 21 88%
24 19 79%
24 22 92%
15 10 67%
24 20 83%
24 17 71%
24 23 96%
24 IS 75%
24 47 100%
24 30 100%
24 25 100%
15 2 13%
15 1 7%
24 19 79%
15 15 100%
15 13 87%
15 13 87%
24 24 100%
15 15 100%
15 15 100%
15 13 87%
15 10 67%
15 3 20%
15 9 60%
15 15 100%
24 23 96%
24 23 96%
24 22 92%
24 27 100%
15 15 100%
24 20 83%
15 4 27%
24 21 88%
15 2 13%
15 2 13%
24 14 58%
15 8 53%
Bias (%)
Lower Upper
Bound Mean Bound
-18.8 -12.4 -5.9
-4.0 0.2 4.4
-14.9 -S.S -2.7
-13.1 -9.0 -4.9
-14.3 -6.4 1.6
-13.5 -8.1 -2.6
-20.9 -15.7 -10.4
-12.9 -9.4 -6.0
-41.1 -37.1 -33.1
-29.8
-19.5 -13.3 -7.2
-10.7 -5.2 0.4
-13.7 -10.9 -8.1
-14.9 -8.3 -1.7
-13.6 -5.0 3.7
-8.7 -3.7 1.4
-17.1 -14.1 -11.1
-10.2 -6.4 -2.5
-12.9 -9.7 -6.4
-28.9 -24.8 -20.6
-16.6 -7.6 1.3
-13.5 -10.5 -7.6
-7.2 -3.5 0.2
-26.0 -17.4 -S.S
-18.5 -14.1 -9.7
-18.8 -13.6 -8.4
-21.5 -16.1 -10.7
-5.9 -3.9 -2.0
-7.1 -5.1 -3.0
-11.5 -8.1 -4.7
-17.7 -13.1 -8.4
53.3 92.2 131.2
-21.1
-19.8 -13.3 -6.9
-7.0 -2.2 2.6
-8.9 -4.9 -0.8
-19.5 -13.7 -7.9
-12.4 -7.0 -1.6
-6.4 -1.7 3.0
-13.1 -3.3 6.4
-14.5 -8.6 -2.7
-29.8 -16.3 -2.8
-56.2 -14.7 26.9
-14.8 -6.8 1.1
-24.6 -5.8 13.1
-3.8 0.8 5.5
-9.2 -1.8 5.6
-19.2 -10.1 -1.0
-26.3 -22.5 -18.6
-6.4 4.3 14.9
-17.1 3.2 23.5
-6.5 1.2 S.S
-18.4 -3.5 11.5
-140.3 -18.0 104.3
-13.4 -7.4 -1.3
-18.4 -7.1 4.3
Pagel
-------
Attachment 5a. Bias assessment with all valid PEP/Primary pairs included in completeness but only pairs >= 3 [ig/m3 included in bias estimates.
Reg State PQAO PQAO Name
7 IA 0874 Polk County Physical Planning
7 IA 1080 University Hygenic Laboratory
7 KS 0563 Kansas Department Of Health And Environment
7 MO 0588 Missouri Laboratory Services Program
7 NE 0752 Nebraska Department Of Environmental Control
7 NE 0816 Omaha-Douglas County Health Department
8 CO 0240 Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment
8 CO 750 Southern Ute Indian Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation, CO
8 MT 0730 Mt Dept Of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division
8 ND 0782 North Dakota State Department Of Health
8 SD 0973 South Dakota Dept Environmental Protection Air Quality Program
8 UT 1113 Utah Department Of Environmental Quality
8 WY 1188 Wyoming Air Quality Division, Dept Of Environmental Quality
9 AZ 0053 Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality
9 AZ 615 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of Salt River Reservation, AZ
9 AZ 0643 Maricopa County Air Quality
9 AZ 0864 Pima County Health Department
9 AZ 0865 Pinal County APCD
9 CA 0086 Bay Area Air Quality Management District
9 CA 0145 California Air Resources Board
9 CA 0942 San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
9 CA 0972 South Coast Air Quality Management District
9 HI 0481 Hawaii State Department Of Health
9 NV 0226 Clark County, NV DAQEM
9 NV 1138 Washoe County District Health Department
10 AK 0015 Alaska Department Of Environmental Conservation
10 ID 180 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall Reservation of Idaho
10 ID 0511 Idaho Department Of Health And Welfare-Environment Division
10 OR 0821 Oregon Department Of Environmental Quality
10 WA 1136 Washington State Department Of Ecology
2008
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
257
883
10 8 8
15 8 8
354
454
14 8 6
050
IS 8 9
455
984
10 8 9
786
684
150
353
255
354
15 8 8
40 8 11
10 8 5
21 8 10
685
354
154
454
152
888
19 8 8
11 8 5
2009
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
255
985
10 8 9
20 8 9
453
555
14 8 7
250
IS 8 6
455
984
987
986
685
154
354
255
355
22 8 11
44 8 13
11 8 5
21 8 8
782
355
155
553
256
787
21 8 9
10 8 3
2010
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
255
981
10 8 7
14 8 3
357
553
14 8 0
254
20 8 4
685
988
983
985
786
155
456
256
354
13 8 4
54 8 11
11 8 5
21 8 9
550
456
155
457
250
788
21 8 6
12 8 4
3-Year
Valid
Required Pairs %Comp
15 17 100%
24 9 38%
24 24 100%
24 20 83%
15 14 93%
15 12 80%
24 13 54%
15 4 27%
24 19 79%
IS 15 83%
24 16 67%
24 19 79%
24 17 71%
24 15 63%
15 9 60%
15 13 87%
15 16 100%
15 13 87%
24 23 96%
24 35 100%
24 15 63%
24 27 100%
21 7 33%
15 15 100%
15 14 93%
15 14 93%
15 8 53%
24 23 96%
24 23 96%
24 12 50%
Bias (%)
Lower Upper
Bound Mean Bound
-13.6 -8.6 -3.6
-12.9 2.8 18.6
-12.8 -8.9 -5.1
-10.4 -5.1 0.3
-19.7 -10.6 -1.5
-13.0 -1.9 9.2
-17.9 -10.9 -3.9
-49.7 0.8 51.3
-9.0 -4.7 -0.5
-S.S 2.1 13.0
-13.5 -7.0 -0.5
-7.9 -0.2 7.4
-18.2 -10.4 -2.5
-21.5 -11.9 -2.2
-23.6 -15.8 -7.9
-14.4 -8.5 -2.5
-26.2 -20.3 -14.3
-13.1 15.0 43.1
-8.7 -3.8 1.0
-15.9 -10.7 -5.5
-13.8 -8.3 -2.9
-18.2 -14.4 -10.6
-28.1 -19.2 -10.2
-8.6 -2.6 3.3
-14.5 -9.2 -4.0
-24.3 -19.6 -15.0
-22.9 -9.6 3.7
-16.6 -12.5 -8.3
-20.7 -16.4 -12.1
-23.0 -14.4 -5.8
Page 2
-------
Attachment 5b. Bias assessment with all valid PEP/Primary pairs (SPMs allowed) included in completeness but only pairs >= 3 ug/m3 included in bias estimates.
Reg State PQAO PQAO Name
1 CT 0251 Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
1 MA 0660 Mass Dept Environmental Protection-Div Air Quality Control
1 ME 0635 Maine D.E. P. Bureau Of Air Quality Control, Augusta
1 NH 0762 New Hampshire Air Resources Agency
1 Rl 0907 Rhode Island DEM And DOH
1 VT 1119 Vermont Agency Of Environmental Conservation
2 NJ 0764 New Jersey State Department Of Environmental Protection
2 NY 0768 New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation
2 PR 0889 Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board
2 VI 1124 Virgin Islands Department Of Planning & Natural Resources
3 DC 0350 District Dept of Environment, Air Quality Div- DDOE/AQD
3 DE 0294 Delaware Dept Natural Resources and Environmental Control
3 MD 1002 State Of Maryland Air Management Adminis
3 PA 0021 Allegheny County.PA Health Department
3 PA 0851 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection
3 PA 0861 Philadelphia Air Management Services
3 VA 1127 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
3 WV 1150 West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission
4 AL 0013 Al Dept Of Env Mgt
4 FL 1328 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
4 GA 0437 Georgia Air Protection Branch Ambient Monitoring Program
4 KY 0584 Kentucky Division For Air Quality
4 MS 0703 Mississippi DEQ, Office Of Pollution
4 NC 001 Eastern Band Of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina
4 NC 0776 North Carolina Dept Of Environment And Natural Resources
4 SC 0971 South Carolina Department Health And Environmental Control
4 TN 1025 Tennessee Division Of Air Pollution Control
5 IL 0258 Cook County Department of Environmental Control
5 IL 0513 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
5 IN 0520 Indiana Depart Of Environ Management/Office Of AirQuality
5 Ml 0685 Michigan Dept Of Environmental Quality-Air Quality Division
5 Ml W44 Inter-tribal Council of Michigan, Inc.
5 MN 407 Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, MN (Leech Lake Band)
5 MN 0700 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Division of Air Quality
5 OH 0012 Akron Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0151 Canton City Health Department Air Pollution Contro
5 OH 0220 City of Toledo, Environmental Services Division
5 OH 0229 Cleveland Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0287 Dayton Regional Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0595 Lake County Health Department Division Air Pollution Control
5 OH 0634 Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency
5 OH 0805 Ohio EPA, Central District Office
5 OH 0807 Ohio EPA, Northeast District Office
5 OH 0809 Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office
5 OH 0880 Portsmouth City Health Dept Division Air Pollution Control
5 OH 1259 Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services
5 Wl 1175 Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section
6 AR 0055 Arkansas Department Of Environmental Quality
6 LA 1001 State Of Louisiana
6 NM 0017 Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, Air Quality Division
6 NM 0765 New Mexico Environment Department
6 OK 807 Delaware Nation, OK
6 OK 0812 Oklahoma Dept. Of Environmental Quality
6 OK 905 Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma
6 OK 920 Quapaw Tribe of Indians, OK
6 TX 1035 Texas Commission On Environmental Quality
7 IA 0613 Linn County Health Department
2008
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 8
15 8 8
558
689
686
455
20 8 6
26 8 4
10 8 6
150
355
789
15 8 7
553
21 8 5
554
21 8 5
11 8 9
17 8 8
29 8 8
29 8 5
20 8 7
13 8 6
150
35 8 3
16 8 10
16 8 8
885
30 8 22
35 8 12
27 8 7
350
151
15 8 4
455
253
453
788
455
155
354
353
151
353
355
11 8 7
21 8 7
16 8 8
15 8 8
254
984
151
785
550
150
15 8 5
254
2009
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 9
15 8 7
687
554
554
455
21 8 9
25 8 7
10 8 5
151
355
787
15 8 8
558
31 8 4
558
22 8 8
11 8 6
17 8 8
30 8 8
30 8 8
21 8 7
14 8 8
155
36 8 9
13 8 8
15 8 7
883
30 8 14
39 8 10
27 8 10
450
150
15 8 8
555
255
355
788
455
255
254
353
151
353
255
11 8 8
23 8 10
16 8 6
15 8 9
255
988
150
787
250
150
15 8 7
256
2010
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
12 8 8
15 8 9
687
556
553
456
22 8 8
25 8 8
10 8 6
150
354
787
20 8 6
558
25 8 8
688
24 8 8
11 8 7
15 8 6
31 8 8
30 8 8
21 8 5
14 8 8
155
36 8 8
12 8 9
15 8 8
8 8 10
30 8 11
41 8 8
27 8 8
452
150
15 8 8
555
255
355
688
455
255
355
454
151
353
255
11 8 8
24 8 7
16 8 8
15 8 10
256
988
153
789
252
152
15 8 6
256
3-Year
Valid
Required Pairs %Comp
24 25 100%
24 24 100%
21 22 100%
IS 19 100%
IS 13 72%
15 16 100%
24 23 96%
24 19 79%
24 17 71%
15 1 7%
15 14 93%
24 23 96%
24 21 88%
15 19 100%
24 17 71%
IS 20 100%
24 21 88%
24 22 92%
24 22 92%
24 24 100%
24 21 88%
24 19 79%
24 22 92%
15 10 67%
24 20 83%
24 27 100%
24 23 96%
24 IS 75%
24 47 100%
24 30 100%
24 25 100%
15 2 13%
15 1 7%
24 20 83%
15 15 100%
15 13 87%
15 13 87%
24 24 100%
15 15 100%
15 15 100%
15 13 87%
15 10 67%
15 3 20%
15 9 60%
15 15 100%
24 23 96%
24 24 100%
24 22 92%
24 27 100%
15 15 100%
24 20 83%
15 4 27%
24 21 88%
15 2 13%
15 2 13%
24 IS 75%
15 16 100%
Bias (%)
Lower Upper
Bound Mean Bound
-17.6 -12.3 -7.0
-4.0 0.2 4.4
-13.4 -9.1 -4.8
-13.1 -9.0 -4.9
-14.3 -6.4 1.6
-13.5 -8.1 -2.6
-20.9 -15.7 -10.4
-12.9 -9.4 -6.0
-41.1 -37.1 -33.1
-29.8
-19.5 -13.3 -7.2
-10.7 -5.2 0.4
-13.7 -10.9 -8.1
-13.5 -8.0 -2.5
-13.6 -5.0 3.7
-8.7 -3.7 1.4
-17.1 -14.1 -11.1
-9.7 -6.0 -2.3
-12.9 -9.7 -6.4
-28.9 -24.8 -20.6
-16.6 -7.6 1.3
-13.5 -10.5 -7.6
-7.2 -3.5 0.2
-26.0 -17.4 -B.B
-18.5 -14.1 -9.7
-19.7 -14.5 -9.2
-21.5 -16.1 -10.7
-5.9 -3.9 -2.0
-7.1 -5.1 -3.0
-11.5 -8.1 -4.7
-17.7 -13.1 -8.4
53.3 92.2 131.2
-21.1
-18.8 -12.5 -6.3
-7.0 -2.2 2.6
-8.9 -4.9 -0.8
-19.5 -13.7 -7.9
-12.4 -7.0 -1.6
-6.4 -1.7 3.0
-13.1 -3.3 6.4
-14.5 -8.6 -2.7
-29.8 -16.3 -2.8
-56.2 -14.7 26.9
-14.8 -6.8 1.1
-24.6 -5.8 13.1
-3.8 0.8 5.5
-9.4 -2.3 4.8
-19.2 -10.1 -1.0
-26.3 -22.5 -18.6
-6.4 4.3 14.9
-20.0 -12.7 -5.4
-17.1 3.2 23.5
-6.5 1.2 S.S
-18.4 -3.5 11.5
-140.3 -18.0 104.3
-12.9 -8.1 -3.3
-15.8 -8.9 -2.0
Pagel
-------
Attachment 5b. Bias assessment with all valid PEP/Primary pairs (SPMs allowed) included in completeness but only pairs >= 3 [ig/m3 included in bias estimates.
Reg State PQAO PQAO Name
7 IA 0874 Polk County Physical Planning
7 IA 1080 University Hygenic Laboratory
7 KS 0563 Kansas Department Of Health And Environment
7 MO 0588 Missouri Laboratory Services Program
7 NE 0752 Nebraska Department Of Environmental Control
7 NE 0816 Omaha-Douglas County Health Department
8 CO 0240 Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment
8 CO 750 Southern Ute Indian Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation, CO
8 MT 0730 Mt Dept Of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division
8 ND 0782 North Dakota State Department Of Health
8 SD 0973 South Dakota Dept Environmental Protection Air Quality Program
8 UT 1113 Utah Department Of Environmental Quality
8 WY 1188 Wyoming Air Quality Division, Dept Of Environmental Quality
9 AZ 0053 Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality
9 AZ 615 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of Salt River Reservation, AZ
9 AZ 0643 Maricopa County Air Quality
9 AZ 0864 Pima County Health Department
9 AZ 0865 Pinal County APCD
9 CA 0086 Bay Area Air Quality Management District
9 CA 0145 California Air Resources Board
9 CA 0942 San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
9 CA 0972 South Coast Air Quality Management District
9 HI 0481 Hawaii State Department Of Health
9 NV 0226 Clark County, NVDAQEM
9 NV 1138 Washoe County District Health Department
10 AK 0015 Alaska Department Of Environmental Conservation
10 ID 180 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall Reservation of Idaho
10 ID 0511 Idaho Department Of Health And Welfare-Environment Division
10 OR 0821 Oregon Department Of Environmental Quality
10 WA 1136 Washington State Department Of Ecology
2008
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
257
887
10 8 8
15 8 9
354
454
14 8 6
050
IS 8 9
455
984
10 8 9
786
684
150
353
255
354
15 8 8
40 8 11
10 8 5
21 8 10
685
354
154
454
152
888
19 8 8
11 8 5
2009
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
255
989
10 8 9
20 8 9
453
555
14 8 7
250
IS 8 6
455
984
987
986
685
154
354
255
355
22 8 11
44 8 13
11 8 5
21 8 8
782
355
155
553
256
787
21 8 9
10 8 3
2010
Valid
Primary Required Pairs
255
986
10 8 7
14 8 3
357
553
14 8 8
254
20 8 4
685
988
986
985
786
155
456
256
356
13 8 4
54 8 12
11 8 5
21 8 9
550
456
155
457
250
788
21 8 6
12 8 4
3-Year
Valid
Required Pairs %Comp
15 17 100%
24 22 92%
24 24 100%
24 21 88%
15 14 93%
15 12 80%
24 21 88%
15 4 27%
24 19 79%
IS 15 83%
24 16 67%
24 22 92%
24 17 71%
24 15 63%
15 9 60%
15 13 87%
15 16 100%
15 15 100%
24 23 96%
24 36 100%
24 15 63%
24 27 100%
21 7 33%
15 15 100%
15 14 93%
15 14 93%
15 8 53%
24 23 96%
24 23 96%
24 12 50%
Bias (%)
Lower Upper
Bound Mean Bound
-13.6 -8.6 -3.6
-9.4 -2.0 5.3
-12.8 -8.9 -5.1
-10.4 -5.3 -0.3
-13.0 -1.9 9.2
-14.2 -7.6 -0.9
-49.7 0.8 51.3
-9.0 -4.7 -0.5
-S.S 2.1 13.0
-13.5 -7.0 -0.5
-10.0 -3.1 3.8
-18.2 -10.4 -2.5
-21.5 -11.9 -2.2
-23.6 -15.8 -7.9
-14.4 -8.5 -2.5
-26.2 -20.3 -14.3
-9.7 13.8 37.2
-8.7 -3.8 1.0
-15.7 -10.6 -5.5
-13.8 -8.3 -2.9
-18.2 -14.4 -10.6
-28.1 -19.2 -10.2
-8.6 -2.6 3.3
-14.5 -9.2 -4.0
-24.3 -19.6 -15.0
-22.9 -9.6 3.7
-16.6 -12.5 -8.3
-20.7 -16.4 -12.1
-23.0 -14.4 -5.8
Page 2
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Attachment 6
2008-2010 Data Processing Details
This attachment documents data processing steps followed in the development of this 3-year QA
report. The purpose of this documentation is to ensure users of this report are aware of and
understand these steps and to provide details that may be useful for the generation of future
reports. Specifically, this attachment describes the development of the databases for routine
completeness, flow rate, precision, and bias for the 2008-2010 PM2.5 QA Report. The first
section provides information that is relevant for all four databases. This section is followed by
four sections containing details specific to each of the four databases. This attachment closes
with some additional information uncovered during these analyses.
STEPS RELEVANT for all databases
Some steps were followed for all four databases. These steps involved identifying which PM2.5
monitors to include and what data to use from each of those monitors.
Certain monitors are required to follow all quality assurance requirements listed in 40 CFR Part
58 Appendix A and others are not, although they may in fact follow the requirements. Those
required to follow Appendix A are identified as Primary and are associated with specific monitor
types. Also, many of the summaries in this report are separated by sampling methodology.
Some monitoring locations reported data under multiple sampling methodologies during 2008-
2010. The following subsections provide details about the identification of primary monitors,
determination of monitor types, and handling of multiple sampling methodologies.
Primary Monitors
Primary monitors are those for which their data are to be compared to the PIVb.s NAAQS.
Identification of primary monitors was achieved by retrieving a list of primary monitors from
AQS, this list being one of the tables maintained in Discoverer, specifically
Primary_monitor_periods_V. The retrieval was executed on May 15, 2013. For each monitor,
the file contained a 9-digit site code, 1-digit POC, and Begin and End Dates demarking when
each monitor was primary. A monitor will have multiple records in this file if the monitor was
primary for disjoint periods of time. If a monitor was primary for disjoint periods of time
separated by only a few days, then it was assumed the monitor was primary for both periods of
time, including the few days in between. There were only two such cases.
At the outset of the development of this report, it was decided to summarize flow rate, precision,
and bias data only for monitors that had been primary for at least half of 2008-2010 (at least 500
days). The reasoning for this was that patterns at the national level would be clearer if the set of
monitors on which results were based were long-term monitors. However, after reviewing the
results, it was found that this decision resulted in a significant reduction in the number of pairs
available for the bias assessment. Thus the 500-day requirement was removed for the bias work.
For future reports, this requirement likely should be relaxed also for the precision and flow rate
analyses.
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Monitor Type
Data submitted to AQS must have an associated monitor type or types. Certain monitor types
are required to follow the collocation requirements for precision and bias, as listed in 40 CFR
Part 58 Appendix A.
Monitor types for each PM2.5 monitor were identified through a retrieval from AQS involving the
merging of two tables in Discoverer, one of monitor types and one of parameters to subset to
PM2.5. In Discoverer, the tables used were Monitor_Type_Assignments_V and Monitors_V,
respectively. The retrieval was executed on January 3, 2013. For each monitor type for each
monitor, the file contained a 9-digit site code, 1-digit POC, and Begin and End Dates demarking
the effective dates for that monitor type. A monitor will have multiple records in this file if the
monitor has had multiple monitor types. For sites with multiple monitor types, effective dates
for the different types may overlap, meaning multiple types may be present concurrently, or be
disjointed; meaning only one type is present at a time.
For Routine Completeness, monitors that were SLAMS, Tribal Monitors, NCore, or Proposed
NCore at some time during 2008-2010 were included.
For Flow Rate, any record associated with a monitor type of SLAMS, NCore, Proposed NCore,
Special Purpose, or Tribal Monitors were retained.
For Bias and Precision, monitor types and combinations thereof retained and omitted for this
report are provided in the following table. Note that these combinations are for sites that were
primary at some time in 2008-2010 only. Sites that were not primary in 2008-2010 and sites that
were primary outside of 2008-2010 may have other combinations, but these combinations were
not considered in the development of the following table since interest for this report was solely
with monitors that were primary for some time in 2008-2010. It was noted that no monitor had
more than 2 concurrent monitor types.
Single and Concurrent Combinations of Monitor Types
Retained and Omitted for 2008-2010 PM2.5 QA Report
(Cases presented are those observed on 2008-2010 database, not all possible combinations)
Number of
Concurrent Types
Combinations of Monitor Types
Retained
Combinations of Monitor Types
Omitted
1
SLAMS
NCORE
Proposed NCORE
Tribal Monitors
Industrial
Non-EPA Federal
Non-Regul atory
Other
QA Collocated
Special Purpose
Supplemental Speciation
-------
PM2 s 3-Year QA Report
April 2014
Single and Concurrent Combinations of Monitor Types
Retained and Omitted for 2008-2010 PM2.5 QA Report
(Cases presented are those observed on 2008-2010 database, not all possible combinations)
Number of
Concurrent Types
Combinations of Monitor Types
Retained
Combinations of Monitor Types
Omitted
SLAMS + NCORE
SLAMS + Special Purpose
SLAMS + Tribal Monitors
SLAMS + QA Collocated
SLAMS + Other
NCORE + Proposed NCORE
NCORE + Tribal Monitors
NCORE + QA Collocated
NCORE + Other
Proposed NCORE + Tribal
Monitors
NCORE + Special Purpose
Tribal Monitors + Non-Regulatory
Special Purpose + Unknown
Special Purpose + Non-Regulatory
Example: Suppose a monitor is Other 1/1/08-6/1/10 and is SLAMS 1/1/10-12/31/10. Then
for 1/1/08-12/31/09, monitor is Other only so dates are omitted,
for 1/1/10-6/1/10, monitor is Other and SLAMS so dates are retained, and
for 6/2/10-12/31/10, monitor is SLAMS only so dates are retained.
The Bias Assessment summarized in Attachment 5 (Bias for each PQAO) was performed
allowing 2 sets of monitor types. For one case, bias pairs associated with a monitor of type
Special Purpose or concurrent monitor types of NCore and Special Purpose were excluded and
for the second case, bias pairs for these monitor types were included. The reason for running the
bias analysis both ways is due to some potential confusion about whether data from a Special
Purpose monitor is subject to Appendix A requirements. Since there are few bias pairs per
PQAO, if a PQAO decided that Special Purpose monitors were subject to Appendix A
requirements, then including these could significantly impact the number of bias pairs available
for that PQAO.
For future reports, it is suggested that the flow rate, precision, and bias summaries all use the
same definition of retained and omitted monitor types for consistency across all reports.
Associating PQAO with Each Monitor
Summaries of PM2.5 quality indicators are provided at the Primary Quality Assurance
Organization (PQAO) level. To do so requires assigning each monitor to a PQAO. To make this
assignment, data from an AMP 500 were used. This file contains the Begin and End Dates for
each PQAO associated with each 9-digit site. Data from the AMP 500 were extracted from AQS
on November 8, 2012 for this purpose.
For this report, each monitor was assigned to exactly one PQAO for the entire time frame of
2008-2010. Specifically, each monitor was assigned to the PQAO for which it was most current
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
in 2008-2010. For example, if a monitor was in PQAO A in 2008 and PQAO B for 2009 and
2010, then the data for this monitor were included in PQAO B for all of 2008-2010 since PQAO
B is more current than PQAO A. For another example, if a monitor was in PQAO C in 2008-
2010 and in PQAO D in 2011, the monitor was included in PQAO C for all of 2008-2010. Even
though PQAO D is more current, it applies outside of 2008-2010 and thus is not considered.
Associating Method with Each Monitor
Precision and bias collocation requirements are at the method designation level, thus it is
necessary to know how many monitors are operating each type of method within each PQAO.
To determine method, the method associated with each monitor shown in Attachment 1, the
Routine Completeness table, was used. For some of these monitors, the method is listed as "0".
These are cases where data for multiple methods is reported. In these cases, the method with the
largest number of concentrations reported for the year on an AMP 501 report from AQS was the
one associated with that monitor for the purpose of precision and bias collocation requirements.
In the case of hourly data, these data were averaged to create daily values. If a daily value was
based on hourly measurements from more than one method, this daily value was deleted. This
resulted in the omission of only one daily value.
At the outset of the development of this report, it was initially decided to retain monitors with
only 0 or 1 method changes in all of 2008-2010 for the precision and bias work. The rationale
was similar to that used for monitors being primary for at least 500 days. That is, the thought
was that monitors that were not changing methods were the more long-term monitors and that
they therefore would have more stable precision and bias estimates. Ninety-five percent of all
primary monitors in 2008-2010 had 0 or 1 method changes. The other 5% had as few as 2
method changes up to as many as 500 changes. To maximize the amount of data available for
the precision and especially the bias analyses, the restriction about the number of method
changes was later removed so that any number of changes in reported method was allowed.
For monitors with multiple methods reported within a year, it was initially decided to associate
all of the year's data with the first method reported. The rationale for this was that decisions
about collocation are made early in the year so that resources can be allocated appropriately.
However, once it was seen that the number of method changes could be very large, it was then
decided to use the most commonly reported method.
STEPS RELEVANT for Routine Data Completeness
Data from the AMP 420 report (data completeness) from AQS was used for completeness. For
months subsequent to the "end" month specified on the AMP 420, data capture was changed
from 0 to blank so those subsequent months did not impact quarterly or annual capture rates. For
estimating national completeness, only those monitors that were primary were included for the
period during which they were primary. Monitors with a monitor type of "Tribal Monitors" on
the AMP 420 were summarized in the "Tribal" category and all other monitors were summarized
in the "SLAMS" category.
Attachment 1 contains all sites with sampling Begin and End dates that include some or all of
2008-2010, regardless of whether the site was designated as primary.
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
STEPS RELEVANT for Flow Rate
Accuracy audit flow data were downloaded from AQS on March 15, 2012, as an AMP 502
report (precision and accuracy). Observations with null value codes were excluded. All other
flags had no impact on the development of this database. An average percent difference was
calculated for records that contained multiple accuracy measurements. Similarly, an average
percent difference was calculated for multiple records with the same audit date.
Data with monitor types of SLAMS, NCORE, Proposed NCORE, Special Purpose, and Tribal
monitors were retained. All others were omitted. The monitor type associated with each
monitor was the most recent monitoring type for 2008-2010.
To create completeness counts (Table 2-2), for each site/POC, the number of quarters in a year
for which an audit was taken was counted. Based on the operation dates for each site/POC, the
number of required audits in a year was calculated. Specifically, if a site was operational for 1-6
months in a year, one audit was required, and if a site was operational for >6 months in a year,
two audits were required. Completeness percentages were calculated as follows. If audits were
taken for at least two quarters in a year, a site/POC was assigned a percent completeness of
100% for that year. If audits were taken for just 1 quarter in a year, the percent completeness
was 50% for the year. In this way, no site received greater than 100% completeness even though
some sites had more than two audits.
To create a summary of percent differences (Figure 2.5) only the primary monitor accuracy
audits were used. The percent difference measurements were organized in ascending order and
numbered consecutively. This rank of audits was then plotted to create Figure 2.5.
STEPS RELEVANT for Precision
Precision data may be loaded to AQS either as data streams for two independent samplers—with
one denoted the primary sampler and one denoted the collocated sampler—or as a Precision and
Accuracy Transaction such that the paired values are loaded. Both sources of data must be
accessed to compile a complete precision database. That is, neither approach contains all of the
precision data.
Data loaded as independent samplers were extracted from AQS Discoverer from the
AutomatedPrecisionData view. The data loaded as Precision and Accuracy (P&A) Transactions
were extracted from AQS Discoverer from the PrecisionData view. Both extractions were
performed on February 14, 2013. Where there were differences between data reported on a P&A
transaction and data reported as raw data streams, the data from the raw data streams was
retained. There were few differences, some due to different method codes (less than 5 cases),
and some due to different concentrations (also less than 5 cases). Hourly data with fewer than 18
hours representing a day (75%) were omitted.
Relative percent differences were calculated for each pair (Xi,Yt), where /' represents a day, using
Equation 1. Equation 1 is identical to Equation 10 in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A.
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
For this report, only FRMs are summarized for precision. All counts are based on all valid pairs.
Precision estimates are based only on those pairs for which the minimum concentration is greater
than or equal to 3 ug/m3.
STEPS RELEVANT for Bias
The bias database was generated using two AQS reports: an AMP 350 (Raw Data) and AMP
502 (Precision and Accuracy). Both of these were then imported into Microsoft Access, where a
query was run to select concentration data from the AMP 502 where the "Agency Performing
Audit" field was not null. These data were then matched to those on the AMP 350, joining by
site, date, duration, and POC. The AMP 350 provided the indicated values and methods whereas
the AMP502 provided the actual values and methods. Pairs were retained only for those time
intervals during which a monitor was primary and of desired monitor types.
Percent differences were calculated for each pair (Xi,Yi) using Equation 2, whereXt represents the
indicated concentration on day / and Yt represents the actual concentration on day /'. Equation 2
is identical to Equation 1 in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A.
Xi-Yi
di= * 100 [Eqn2]
*i
All bias counts are based on all valid pairs. Bias estimates are based only on those pairs for
which the minimum concentrations are greater than or equal to 3 ug/m3.
Additional Details
An important function of the 3-Year PM2.5 QA Reports is to check the coding of elements in
AQS, elements that are important for summarizing, evaluating, and understanding the quality of
the data coming from the PM2.5 monitoring network. This function proved especially important
for precision for this report.
During the processing of the precision data, it was noted that some PQAOs had no collocation
for precision for any primary monitors of the specified monitoring types. As another example,
some states had precision data only for collocated FRM monitors of different sampling
methodologies even though CFR stipulates that similar methods are to be collocated when the
primary sampler is an FRM.
To assist with understanding of these issues, two preliminary bias and precision assessments
were generated: one that was based solely on quality assurance data that complied with CFR
requirements, and a second that was based on all quality assurance data reported. Where there
were differences between the two assessments, especially striking differences such as no data to
assess in the CFR-compliant case, the EPA Regional Offices worked with the State, Local, and
Tribal entities to understand the differences. In several cases, it was discovered that the AQS
codes associated with a monitor were not correct. These were updated and new extractions from
AQS were then made for the analyses reported in this report.
For future 3-year QA reports, it may be fruitful to perform this initial step of reviewing coding
prior to performing any data analyses.
-------
PM2 5 3-Year QA Report April 2014
Also, one of the EPA Regions reviewed summary reports generated by AQS to assess the bias
counts reported in Attachment 5 of this report. The AQS report used was the AMP 250. This
proved to be an invaluable comparison because it uncovered that the AMP 250 report includes
bias pairs from dates for which a monitor was not primary whereas Attachment 5 includes only
those bias pairs collected during time periods for which a monitor was listed as being primary.
Thus two QA reports may provide different summary statistics depending on what data are
allowed or disallowed in those summaries. This highlighted the importance of clearly specifying
what data are and are not included in summaries. This attachment was developed with the goal
of providing such specificity for the 2008-2010 PM2.s QA Report.
-------
United States Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Publication No. EPA-455/R-14-004
Environmental Protection [Name of Division] April, 2014
Agency Research Triangle Park, NC
------- |