EPA/600/R-13/180 | May 2014 | www.epa.gov/research
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Monitoring Dissolved Oxygen
in New Jersey Coastal Waters
Using Autonomous Gliders
Office of Research and Development
-------
EPA/600/R-13/180
May 2014
Monitoring Dissolved Oxygen in New
Jersey Coastal Waters Using Autonomous
Gliders
by
Josh Kohut, Chip Haldeman, and John Kerfoot
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences
71 Dudley Road
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Project Officer:
Michael Borst
USEPA Office of Research and Development
National Risk Management Laboratory
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
May 15, 2014
-------
Table of Contents
Notice HI
Executive Summary iv
Figures v
Tables vi
Acronyms and Abbreviations vii
Acknowledgements viii
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Project Objectives 2
1.3 Shallow Glider AUV 2
1.4 Specific Glider Setup 4
2. Data Analysis 6
2.1 Quality Assurance 6
2.1.1 Dissolved Oxygen 7
2.1.2 Hydrography 8
2.2 Data Post Processing 9
2.2.1 Dissolved Oxygen 9
2.2.2 Hydrography 10
3. Results 11
3.1 Temperature 13
3.2 Salinity 13
3.3 Dissolved Oxygen 15
3.3.1 Spatial/Temporal Distribution 16
3.3.2 Decorrelation Scales 17
3.3.3 Wind Influence 18
3.4 Event Response: Summer Bloom 2011 21
3.5 Event Response: Hurricane Irene 22
4. Conclusions 23
References 25
Appendices
Quality Assurance Project Plan A-l
Mission 1 Documents B-l
Mission 2 Documents C-l
Mission 3 Documents D-l
Mission 4 Documents E-l
Mission 5 Documents F-l
Mission 6 Documents G-l
n
-------
Notice
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and
Development funded the research described here under contract EP11C000085 to
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY. It has been subjected to the
Agency's peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an
EPA document.
-------
Executive Summary
The coastal ocean is a highly variable system with processes that have significant
implications on the hydrographic and oxygen characteristics of the water column. The
spatial and temporal variability of these fields can cause dramatic changes to water
quality and in turn the health of the ecosystem. While low Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
concentrations are not uncommon in the coastal ocean, what is less understood is how the
location and size of these low DO regions vary and what impact that variability has on
ecosystem health. Therefore alternative sampling strategies are needed to continuously
map these low DO areas in a way that quantifies this variability. This project applies a
series of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) deployments from Sandy Hook to
Cape May, NJ to address this need by mapping the subsurface DO concentration in near
real-time within the near coastal ocean.
The long endurance capability combined with the required sawtooth pattern
propulsion make the glider an ideal platform for continuously mapping sub-surface ocean
conditions at high resolution and in near real-time. In this project we completed 6 glider
missions along the New Jersey coast in 2011 and 2012. Each glider was specifically setup
to complete these nearshore missions that focus the monitoring specific to the needs defined
by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (NJDEP). All the glider missions were completed in
accordance to the operating procedures described in the Quality Assurance Project Plan
(QAPP). The QAPP was approved by the project participants at EPA, Rutgers, and
NJDEP. The document clearly states the pre- and post-deployment steps needed to
ensure the quality of the data collected during each mission. By following these
specifications we documented the required quality assurance steps for the AAnderra Optode,
SeaBird CTD (pumped and unpumped) and the glider platform itself. The missions were
carried out with a predefined path that was adjusted through consensus of the project
partners (Rutgers, EPA, and NJDEP) to capture the variability in the magnitude and
structure of dissolved oxygen patterns in the coastal ocean.
Consistent with previous discrete sampling, each glider mission observed DO
concentrations below 5 mg/L. These lower concentrations were limited to the bottom layer.
The unique sampling provided through the glider AUV showed that the DO concentrations
were highly variable in the vertical, horizontal, and through time. The scales of variability
of the DO concentration observed over these two seasons were on the order of 60-80 km in
space and 3-4 days in time. The strongest gradients were observed across the thermocline
with surface waters usually much more oxygenated than the bottom waters. These vertical
gradients were weaker closer to the coast and broke down following strong wind events.
Since sampling was all done in real-time, the monitoring data was immediately available to
NJDEP and EPA to inform their response to these events. Based on these missions, we have
begun to sample the dynamic coastal ocean environment at the scales of known variability.
The results show that while there are persistent patterns in the dissolved oxygen fields off
our coasts, rapid changes can occur with varied effects across the region.
IV
-------
Figures
Figure 1: Sample Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Section 1
Figure 2: Slocum Electric Glider 3
Figure 3: Glider Mission Maps with Dissolved Oxygen 5
Figure 4: Temperature Profile Comparison 8
Figure 5: Cross-sections of Temperature For Each Mission 12
Figure 6: Cross-sections of Salinity For Each Mission 14
Figure 7: Cross-sections of Dissolved Oxygen For Each Mission 15
Figure 8: Dissolved Oxygen Histograms For Each Mission 16
Figure 9: Surface and Bottom Dissolved Oxygen vs. Depth 19
Figure 10: Difference in Surface and Bottom Dissolved Oxygen vs. Depth. 20
Figure 11: True Color Image of Summer Phytoplankton Bloom in 2011 21
Figure 12: Glider Transect During Hurricane Irene 22
Figure 13: Dissolved Oxygen Histograms Before and After Irene 23
-------
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Dissolved Oxygen Comparability Tests 7
Table 2: Summary of CTD Comparability Tests 8
Table 3: Summary of the 6 Glider Missions 11
Table 4: Decorrelation Scales For Time and Space 18
VI
-------
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Coastal Ocean Observation Lab
Colored Dissolved Organic Matter
Conductivity Temperature Depth
Dissolved Oxygen
Global Positioning System
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences
Integrated Ocean Observing System
Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing System
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
AUV
COOL
CDOM
CTD
DO
GPS
IMCS
IOOS
MARACOOS
NJDEP
QAPP
QA/QC
vn
-------
Acknowledgements
The coastal monitoring described here is built on significant leveraging and
partnership. With the support of EPA we filled a critical observing gap along the inner
shelf of the New Jersey coast. The presence of MARACOOS, the Mid-Atlantic Regional
component of IOOS provided critical facilities and technical expertise to accelerate the
adaption of the shelf-wide glider missions to near-shore missions with a specific focus on
water quality monitoring. EPA Region II and NJDEP identified the need and provided the
necessary resources to support these coastal missions. We would like to specifically
acknowledge Michael Borst (EPA), Darvene Adams (EPA), Bruce Friedman (NJDEP), and
Robert Schuster (NJDEP) for all their help with planning and logistics. The captain and
crew of the R/V Clean Waters provided the deployment support and the EPA and NJDEP
crews helped with the recoveries. Throughout the project there is consistent communication
to both adapt the glider mission given the near-real time data and coordinate a response if
needed.
vin
-------
1. Introduction
1.1. Motivation
The coastal ocean is a highly variable system with processes that have significant
implications on the hydrographic and oxygen characteristics of the water column. The
spatial and temporal variability of these fields can cause dramatic changes to water
quality and in turn the health of the ecosystem. Both the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP)
have prioritized monitoring the coastal waters off New Jersey in their long-term strategic
plans as an essential component of the decision-making process. Of particular interest
are the spatial and temporal characteristics of dissolved oxygen (DO). In response to this
need to better understand the dynamics, we put together a program to augment existing
monitoring with targeted deployments of glider Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
(AUVs) equipped with sensors to map coastal dissolved oxygen and hydrographic
conditions in near-real time along the New Jersey inner-shelf
Hypoxic and anoxic conditions ripple through the entire ecosystem causing fish
kills and potentially large disruptions to local and remote food webs. Both NJDEP and
EPA have defined standards and criteria to classify the coastal ocean based on measured
DO concentrations. Healthy ecosystems are typically defined as having DO
concentrations above 5 mg/L. Conditions become hypoxic when DO concentrations
decrease below the 5.0 mg/L limit. DO concentrations less than 2.3 mg/L fall below the
limit of juvenile and adult shellfish and fmfish survival and increase the risks for lethal
impacts to the coastal ocean (U.S. EPA, 2000).
Figure 1: Temperature (upper right) and dissolved oxygen concentration (lower right) collected during a
coastal run along the New Jersey coast from October 8, 2010 through October 25, 2010
Monitoring for DO in the coastal ocean has typically been done through lab
analyses of discrete water samples collected from boats or helicopters. Between 1979
and 2005 this sampling identified DO concentrations below 5.0 mg/L every year off the
-------
coast of New Jersey. While these low values are not uncommon, what is less understood
is how the location and size of these low DO regions vary along the New Jersey coast and
the impact that variability has on ecosystem health. Therefore, alternative sampling
strategies are needed to map the low DO areas in a way that quantifies this variability.
This project applies a series of AUV transits from Sandy Hook to Cape May, NJ to map
the subsurface DO concentration in near real-time within the near coastal ocean (Figure
1). The primary users for the data generated by this project are the EPA and the water
monitoring division of the NJDEP. During each mission the real-time data was used to
map dissolved oxygen and water column stratification along the New Jersey coast. The 6
missions together allow us to begin to quantify range, structure, and evolution of DO off
the New Jersey coast.
1.2 Objectives
The objectives for this project were to:
• Evaluate the use of AUVs as a tool to monitor DO concentrations across a broad
spatial area at high spatial and temporal resolution for the purpose of problem
identification, diagnosis, and evaluation.
• Provide spatially and temporally comprehensive water quality data to be used to
assess the coastal ocean as required under section 106 of the Clean Water Act.
• Produce Standard Operating Procedures, Quality Assurance procedures,
validation data, and a data analysis/data management system for future AUV
monitoring.
1.3 Shallow Glider AUV
The Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences (RU/IMCS) in
collaboration with the Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing
System (MARACOOS), the Mid-Atlantic regional component of the Integrated Ocean
Observing System (IOOS), the NJDEP Division of Water Monitoring and Standards, and
the EPA (Region II and the Office of Research and Development) have demonstrated the
use of the Slocum glider to observe temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen
concentrations off the coast of New Jersey. In the summer of 2009, the first glider
mission to complete the coast wide sampling of hydrography and DO served as a pilot for
the missions described in this report. The glider was deployed on August 20, 2009 for 20
days covering 316 kilometers and generating 5,100 water-column profiles from the
surface to near the ocean floor. This deployment provided a horizontal, vertical, and
temporal resolution of DO in coastal ocean water conditions previously unavailable. The
mission tracked the evolving fields of dissolved oxygen and hydrography through
upwelling and coastal storm events (Ragsdale et al., 2011). This project extends these
types of missions for two summers in 2011 and 2012.
The glider AUV is 1.2 m long and weighs 52 kilograms in air (Figure 2). The
vehicle is designed for long duration missions (exceeding 2 weeks) with frequent
connections to shore for data download and mission modifications. For our coastal
missions the gliders are programmed to surface every 3 hours. At each surfacing the glider
-------
Buoyancy
Pump
Science
Payload Bay
Control
Board
Antenna (Iridium,
Freewave, GPS &
Argos)i—1
Fore Hull
Buoyancy pump in <- the glider
pulls in 0.5 L of water
Aft Hull °Ptode
When surfacing to connect
glider inflates air bladder
Glider begins to
dive downward
Glider begins to
rise upward
Push pump out -> glider inflects and
begins to climb to the surface
Figure 2: Slocum Electric glider including: a photo of the glider components (top); a
schematic illustrating the glider flight path (middle); and two photos showing the glider on the
surface following a deployment (bottom left) and a during recovery (bottom right).
-------
determines its position via Global Positioning System (GPS) and then connects to the
Coastal Ocean Observation Lab (COOL) at Rutgers via satellite. Between connections the
glider is submerged and cutoff from the pilots back on shore. It is during these segments
that the glider samples the sub-surface ocean (Figure 1). The AUV moves through the water
by cycling a buoyancy pump to take in and extract 500 ml of seawater. Near the surface the
glider pulls the seawater into the nose, reducing the internal volume of the glider, lowering
its displacement. The lower displacement causes the glider to sink and it begins to dive.
Using moveable battery packs as ballast, the glider maintains a dive angle of 26 degrees
throughout the decent. This angle is optimal to translate the vertical sinking into forward
motion. When the glider reaches the end of its dive, approximately 2 m above the seafloor,
the piston extends forcing the water back into the ocean through the nose. This increases
the glider's displacement, restores positive buoyancy and allows it to rise toward the surface
(Figure 2). Over these coastal missions we deployed gliders with two types of buoyancy
pumps. Each worked as described above, but had different cycling speeds. Glider ru07 and
ru!6 both had a 100 meter pump that cycled from full in to full out in approximately 10-12
seconds. A second pump installed in ru28 was specifically designed for the shallower
water of the inner shelf. This pump's cycle time was faster going from full in to full out in
5-6 seconds. The fast response time allows the glider to inflect faster and therefore get
closer to the seafloor. Between surfacings, the glider navigates in this sawtooth pattern
using an on board attitude sensor (pitch, roll, and heading) to dead reckon its position along
the path. Steering adjustments are made with a fin to ensure the glider remains on its
intended heading. Once back at the surface it uses the current GPS position and that of the
last surfacing to linearly interpolate its position over the time it was submerged.
The buoyancy-driven propulsion of these vehicles affords high energy efficiency
allowing deployment endurance approaching 30 days with alkaline batteries needing to
provide less than 1,400 amp hours (Schofield et al., 2007). This is the equivalent of
running a 100 watt lightbulb for 21 hours. The buoyancy driven propulsion also puts a
high demand on mission preparation to ensure it operates continuously throughout the
deployment through a wide range of water density. Prior to each mission the glider is
carefully ballasted so that its neutral weight matches the expected mean water density of the
study site. Since the glider depends on displacement adjustments for propulsion, it is
critical that this ballasting step be done precisely. The long endurance capability combined
with the required sawtooth pattern propulsion make the glider an ideal platform for
continuously mapping sub-surface ocean conditions at high vertical and horizontal
resolution and in near real-time.
1.4 Specific Glider Setup
Each glider was specifically setup to complete these nearshore missions that focus
the monitoring specific to the monitoring needs. For each coastal run, the glider was
deployed near Sandy Hook, NJ. The AUV completed a zigzag track along the coast
toward Cape May, NJ (Figure 3). Prior to each mission, Rutgers, NJDEP and EPA
approved the path. This path, defined by a series of waypoints, lead the glider from
Sandy Hook to Cape May sampling the vertical and horizontal structure of DO between 1
and 25 miles from the coast while avoiding known hazards, including fish havens and
shipping lanes. This path was subject to change based on environmental conditions. For
-------
Deployment 1 RU16 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
2 38.5
-75.5 -75 -74.5 -74 -73.5 -73
Deployment 4 RU28 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
-75.5 -75 -74.5 -74 -73.5 -73
Deployment 3 PU07 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
38.5
-75.5 -75 -74.5 -74 -73.5
Deployment 5 RU28 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L
41
•2 38.5 -I
-75.5 -75 -74.5 -74 -73.5 -73
Deployment 6 RU07 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
4.5 -74 -73.5 -73
Figure 3: The path for each deployment completed in August 2011 (upper left), October 2011
(upper middle), June 2012 (upper right), July 2012 (lower left), August 2012 (lower middle),
and September 2012 (lower right). The path color indicates the lowest Dissolved Oxygen
concentration observed for each profile along the track.
-------
example during the summer of 2011 the glider deployed in the first mission was
redirected to focus on a large phytoplankton bloom off the central New Jersey coast.
Later in August that same glider was directed offshore to deeper waters to preserve glider
safety during the rough wave and current conditions during Hurricane Irene. Any
modification was agreed to by the project partners to concentrate the sampling, ensure the
glider was not put into unnecessary risk, or both.
Each glider was equipped with two main sensors, a Sea-Bird Conductivity
Temperature Depth (CTD) (Model GPCTD) and an Aanderraa Optode (Model
3835/5014W). The CTD samples conductivity, temperature and pressure at 0.5 Hz
throughout the mission. The measured water pressure is used to calculate depth. These data
with the interpolated position from the GPS readings allow mapping of the ocean
temperature, salinity and density along the track. The optode measures phase shifts across a
calibrated foil at IHz that when combined with measured temperature gives the calculated
DO concentration and percent saturation. In addition three of the missions were flown
with an additional sensor that measured optical backscatter, Colored Dissolved Organic
Matter (CDOM) fluorescence, and Chlorophyll-a fluorescence. While not a focus of this
report, the Chlorophyll-a fluorescence highlighted location of the peak phytoplankton
concentrations relative to the observed gradients in DO and hydrography.
For each mission the glider was deployed from the EPA Research Vessel Clean
Waters out of Jersey City, NJ. The deployment location was fixed about 8 miles south of
the tip of Sandy Hook 3 miles offshore. To deploy the glider it was simply lowered off the
stern of the Clean Waters before a series of in water test were completed to verify the glider
was working properly. Following the mission we coordinated to EPA and NJDEP to
identify a boat and port closest to the glider position for recovery. On either a NJDEP or
EPA small vessel (less than 30 ft) we would transit out to the glider's location. Once the
glider was visually located from the boat, the glider was gently pulled from the water over
the side of the vessel (Figure 2). The details of the procedures for both deployment and
recovery are outlined in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) included in this report
as Annex A.
2. Data Analysis
2.1 Quality Assurance
All the glider missions were completed in accordance to the operating procedures
described in the QAPP (Annex A). The QAPP was approved by the project participants
at EPA, Rutgers, and NJDEP. The document clearly states the pre- and post-deployment
steps needed to ensure the quality of the data collected during each mission. In addition,
decision making criteria are defined to take advantage of the adaptive capabilities of the
glider sampling and reduce the risk on the glider given changing ocean and atmospheric
conditions. The QAPP with details of the operating procedures will be particularly
useful as the government agencies move forward with incorporating AUV data into
environmental decision-making. This QAPP has already informed the development of
an IOOS document on Quality Assurance and Control Standards for Real-Time
Dissolved Oxygen Measurements.
Over the course of the project, 5 amendments were added to the initial QAPP to
add flexibility to the hardware options while maintaining the quality data standards.
Amendments 1 and 2 allowed us to substitute CTD sensors provided they pass the
-------
comparability tests outlined in the QAPP. Amendment 3 was a simple replacement of a
discontinued titration test kit with its updated replacement as recommend by the vendor.
Amendment 4 allowed us to substitute additional gliders from the Rutgers fleet in the
event of damage or loss so that we could meet the continuous sampling requirements
through the summer months. The final amendment updated some of the mission
documents. As the Rutgers glider program continues to evolve and expand, best
practices are often refined. The specifics of all these amendments are detailed in the
QAPP attached to this report as Appendix A.
As stated previously, the main purpose of these missions was to deliver quality
DO data to both the EPA and NJDEP. Given that, we designed and carried out a
procedure that provides specific requirements for the glider itself and the sensors it
carried on board. Prior to each deployment, the glider went through an extensive check-
out procedure to ensure that all systems (communications, navigation, science payloads,
etc.) were working as required. The results of each check-out and check in following the
deployment were documented and delivered to EPA. These mission documents are
attached to this report as appendices B thru G for each of the 6 missions completed. In
the following sections we detail the sensor specific quality control procedures.
The data analysis carried out for each of these missions was approved by the
project participants in the QAPP. The pre-, post- and in mission planning were all carried
out to ensure quality data output. The primary objective of the work was to ensure the
delivery of quality DO data throughout the water column along the glider's path. In this
section we describe the processing and quality assurance approach we took to ensure that
this objective was met.
2. /../ Dissolved Oxygen:
The dissolved oxygen data was sampled with an optical unit manufactured by
Aanderra Instruments called the optode. Based on manufacturer specifications each
optode deployed was sent to the factory for an annual calibration. In addition to these
annual calibrations, we also completed pre- and post- deployment verifications. To do
Table 1. Summary of DO comparability tests atl 00% saturation this we compared
._ optode observations to
Aanderraa Optode vs. Winkler titration concurrent Winkler
Target: 100% Pre-Deployment Post-Deployment „ .
Deployment Winkler Winkler titrations ot a sample at
both 0% and 100%
#1 95.1% 94.3% Glider lost saturation. Results of
#2 94.6% 94.3% 91.8% 92.4% each comparison were
#3 97.0% 98.8% 97.3% 98.8% , ^ , ~u
#4 97.3% 98.8% 97.6% 95.6% documented. These
#5 97.6% 95.6% 96.2% 94.0% specifications required
#6 96.2% 94.0% 95.3% 96.0% that all Optode
measurements were
within 5% saturation of the results of the Winkler titrations for both the 0% and 100%
saturation samples. For the 0% saturation samples the optodes did not fail any test with
saturations all measured between 0.02% and 0.012% saturation over all deployments.
Similarly for the 100% tests, all optodes met the requirements specified in the QAPP with
all optode measurements within 5% of the Winkler titration results (Table 1). The only
test that could not be completed was the post deployment verification following mission
-------
1. This was the only mission where the glider could not be recovered due to loss. A
copy of the details of each of these verification tests is included in the documentation for
each mission in Appendix B through G.
Table 2. Summary of CTD comparability pre- and post- deployment tank tests.
Glider CTD vs. SEE 19 CTD (in test tank, pre/post deployment verification)
Pre-Deployment Post-Deployment
Temperature Conductivity Temperature Conductivity
SBE19 Glider SBE19 Glider SBE19 Glider SBE19 Glider
Deployment
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
21.290
21.324
18.470
20.326
22.300
22.294
21.309
21.320
18.430
20.328
22.340
22.292
4.459
3.370
4.210
4.406
4.798
4.384
4.457
3.374
4.229
4.403
4.783
4.382
23.024
19.580
22.112
22.256
20.416
Glider lost
23.026 3.614
19.580 4.302
22.116 4.692
22.255 4.979
20.415 4.062
3.614
4.299
4.695
4.976
4.060
"Castaway CTD, not SBE19
2.1.2 Hydrography
The hydrographic data collected on each mission was done with either a pumped
or unpumped CTD specifically engineered for these gliders. Like the optode, we
deployed glider CTDs that were calibrated by the factory at least once per year. With the
loss of ru!6 at the end of the first mission, there was an amendment drafted that would
allow a CTD not factory calibrated within the last year provided it passed the remaining
tests. The verification procedures required a two-tier approach to verifying the
temperature and conductivity data from the glider CTD. The first tier test was a pre- and
-15
-20
20
22
26
-10
ru28-353 recovery
20
Temperature (C)
Figure 4: Comparison temperature profiles for the deployment (top) and recovery (bottom) of
mission 4 in July of 2012. The glider temperature profile is blue and the stand alone CTD is red.
8
-------
post- deployment verification between the glider CTD and a factory calibrated sea bird-
19 CTD in our ballast tank in New Brunswick, NJ. The result of each verification for
each deployment is shown in Table 2. For most missions, the glider CTD passed this
test with all temperature and conductivity measurements within 0.05 C and 0.005 S/M,
respectively. The only exception was the single test (pre-deployment #3) in which a
castaway CTD replaced the standard SEE-19 unit. This castaway was not designed for a
static tank test and therefore the results should be taken with caution. Even with this
known issue, the comparability for both temperature and conductivity were within 0.08 C
and 0.019 S/m, respectively. It could not be determined if this failure was a quality issue
until the post deployment tank test conducted after recovery that verified the glider CTD
measurements were within range of the SEE-19 (Table 2). The second tier test was an in
situ verification at the deployment and recovery of the glider. For each deployment and
recovery we lowered a separate CTD meeting manufacturer calibration requirements to
compare to a concurrent glider profile. This second tier test gave an in situ comparison
within the hydrographic conditions of the mission (Figure 4). For all the deployment
tests, the structure and magnitude of the temperature and conductivity measured by the
glider CTD was verified against the independent measurement (within 0.05 C for
temperature and 0.005 S/m for conductivity). The same was not always possible with the
recovery cast comparisons. Because of the logistics during a recovery it was not always
possible to match the time and location of the CTD and glider casts. The greater the
mismatch, the more influence the different environmental conditions at each cast bias the
comparison. For example the CTD cast shown in (Figure 4, bottom) was taken 730 m
away from and 50 minutes after the glider profile. Given this, the discrepancy between
these casts is less a measure of instrument quality and more a measure of the
environmental variability. Therefore we relied more on the in tank post deployment
comparison tests to verify the quality of the glider CTD sensor (Table 2).
2.2 Data Post Processing
During each mission, data was stored locally on the glider and a subset of data
was sent back to Rutgers via the satellite link. The transmitted subset consisted of every
third data point within alternating profiles. The resulting resolution of this subset was
approximately 0.9 m in the vertical and 110 m in the horizontal. After recovery of the
glider, all data were run through sensor specific QA/QC verifications. The sensor
specific post processing are described in the following two sub-sections.
2.2.1 Dissolved Oxygen
Raw oxygen profiles were corrected using the following criteria:
1. Aanderaa Oxygen Optodes typically exhibit a measurement time lag of -22
seconds (Aanderra Users Manual). During the deployment, we used this stated
value as the shift value. Upon recovery and download of the full resolution
dataset, the following extra steps were taken.
2. Consecutive dissolved oxygen profiles were examined to determine the sensor-
specific time lags by time-shifting the up and down profiles until best alignment
of the vertical features determined by (insert criterion) was achieved. Each sensor
-------
show a time-lag close to the reported time lag (Aanderra Users Manual) with
some slight variation (20 - 25 seconds).
3. A mean time-lag value was selected using the entire dataset from each
deployment and all profiles were then time-shifted by the observed best-result
shift.
2.2.2 Hydrography
CTD: Gliders deployed during this project were configured with pumped and
unpumped CTD sensors. Regardless of whether the CTD was pumped, all CTD profiles
were processed in the same manner. Pumped units typically display smaller errors in raw
sampling, a significant advantage in highly stratified water columns, which are typical in
this area in the Spring, Summer and Fall seasons. The following methods were used to
analyze and correct raw CTD profiles:
1. Raw temperature outliers were removed by comparing against climatology in this
region. A temperature measurement was removed if it was < 8 degrees Celsius or
> 28 degrees Celsius.
2. Individual profiles of temperature and conductivity are checked for spikes using
the methods present in the Argo Data Quality Control Manual v2.8 (Argo Quality
Control Manual). Spike values, defined as (insert e.g., changes of more than
lOOoC) are removed from further processing.
3. Temperature and conductivity profiles are corrected for thermal lag of the
conductivity cell as described in Garau, et.al. (2011). The correction method
aligns the raw temperature and conductivity signals, taking into account the
variable speed of the glider. Four correction parameters are then calculated that
minimize the area between the temperature-salinity curves of 2 consecutive
vertical profiles. These parameters are then used to estimate the temperature
inside the conductivity cell. This estimate of temperature inside the cell is
combined with the measured temperature to calculate salinity for each
profile. This method is shown to correct artificial salinity spikes with values of
upto 0.3 PSU.
4. Consecutive down and up profiles are examined and used to calculate a mean
profile representing the actual water column temperature, conductivity and
salinity profiles. The following assumptions are made:
a. Raw downcast profiles typically exhibit an erroneous spike in the salinity
profile present as abnormally high salinity values in the region of the
thermocline. Density profiles calculated using these erroneous values
result in a thermodynamically unstable water column (higher density
water on top of lower density water).
b. Raw upcast profiles typically exhibit an erroneous spike in the salinity
profile present as abnormally low salinity values in the region of the
thermocline. Density profiles calculated using these erroneous values
10
-------
result In a thermodynamically unstable water column (higher density
water on top of lower density water).
c. Measured temperature and conductivity values for the true water column
profile lie somewhere In between the mean of consecutive
downcasts/upcasts.
d. As a rule of thumb, gliders typically travel twice the horizontal distance as
they travel vertically. For this project, we agreed to provide at least one
profile at 110 meter horizontal resolution. Given that the water column
depth range was 0-30 meters, a consecutive profile pair covered 100 -
120 meters. This methodology allows us to meet the spatial resolution
requirements.
5. Calculated mean profiles were then inspected for salinity spikes and any profile
containing a spike > 0.3 PSU was eliminated from the post-processed dataset
(Garau et.al. 2011). Across all project deployments, less than 1% of the corrected
profiles were discarded.
3.
The six deployments sampled the variability in both the hydrography and
dissolved oxygen over two summers off the coast of New Jersey. To do this we used
three gliders, RU16 (Mission 1), RU07 (Missions 2, 3, & 6), and RU28 (Missions 4 & 5).
Details of each mission including dates, duration, and observations are summarized in
Table 3. The two deployments in 2011 were completed in August and October before,
during, and after a large phytoplankton bloom, Hurricane Irene (August 28, 2011), and
the remnants of Tropical Storm Lee (September 4, 2011). The four deployments In 2012
covered each month between June and September, inclusive, mapping the seasonal
evolution from late spring through early fall. Within each of these missions we observed
significant variability in the measured dissolved oxygen. All six missions measured DO
concentrations below 5 mg/L with 4 missions observing DO concentrations below 2
mg/L.
Table 3. Summary of the 6 glider missions completed in 2011 and 2012.
Temperature
Deployment
#1
#2
#3
#4
Deployment
August 10, 2011
Octobers, 2011
June?, 2012
July 10, 2012
Recovery
September 9, 2011
October 27, 2011
June 19,2012
July 30, 2012
Length (Days)
30
21
12
20
# Profiles
3,952
6,757
6,636
14,641
Min
9.3
15.5
11.3
12.3
Max
25.2
20.1
20.5
26.5
Salinity
Min
29.3
25.5
27.7
29.7
Max
33.3
32.8
32.9
33.2
#5
Deployment
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
August 14, 2012
August 30, 2012
9,084
September 13, 2012 October 4, 2012
Dissolved Oxygen
16
21
Mean Temperature
12.2
11.0
26.0
23.8
28.1
29.3
35.1
Mean Salinity
Mean Dissolved Oxygen
Min
3.07
1.73
4.07
1.88
0.94
0.82
Max
9.23
11.76
12.43
9.81
12.70
13.29
Surface
22.6
17.9
19.3
24.3
24.5
20.8
Bottom
14.2
17.5
16.6
18.4
17.4
16.8
Surface
30.5
29.7
31.0
31.5
31.7
31.9
Bottom
31.7
30.7
31.7
32.0
32.1
32.3
Surface
7.70
7.74
8.34
7.29
7.42
7.10
Bottom
4.81
5.82
6.71
4.87
3.87
4.20
This is consistent with the historic helicopter sampling using a Kemmerer water sampler
in which DO concentrations below 5 mg/L were observed in each year between 1979 and
11
-------
2005 (http://www.epa.gov/region02/monitor/nybight/). The glider sections showed a
persistent vertical structure with lower DO concentrations below the seasonal thermocline
and higher concentrations above. This basic structure was seen to vary in time and space.
Deployment 1 Temp«<«tu(* (Cl
O6W8/I2 06/10/12 06/12/12 06/14/12 06/16/12 06/18/12
Dvfrioymw* 5 Tompmilur* (Cl
09/15/12 08/17/12 08/19/12 08/21/12 08O3/I2 08/25/12 08/27/12 OS/29/12
07/15/12 07/20/12 07/25/12 07/30/12
Figure 5: Cross-sections of temperature for the deployments completed in August 2011
(upper left), October 2011 (upper right), June 2012 (middle left), July 2012 (middle right),
August 2012 (lower left), and September 2012 (lower right).
The objective of this project was to capture that spatial and temporal variability at a
resolution not obtainable from discrete sampling. Spatially, the lowest values were seen
off the Northern New Jersey coast in both the August and October missions in 2011. In
12
-------
2012 the lowest DO were again within the bottom layer below the thermocline. In all
missions, the DO was seen to vary significantly in the vertical profile and along the path
in both space and time. Temporal changes were predominately caused by strong
(Hurricane Irene) and moderate wind events that mixed the more oxygenated surface
water with the deeper less oxygenated water. Spatial variability was strongly depth
dependent with most of the lower concentrations within the bottom layer in waters
shallower than 20 m. There were exceptions to these generalities in each deployment.
While this project focused on the observed variability of the DO fields, it is
important to place these observations in the context of the simultaneously sampled
seawater temperature and salinity. The remaining subsections present the results for the
thermal, saline and DO variability observed through these 6 missions. We characterize
the range as well as structure of these fields as they evolve within and between the
summer seasons of 2011 and 2012.
3.1 Temperature
Mean surface temperatures observed across all missions were in the mid 20s °C,
except in the Fall of 2011 and spring of 2012 where the temperatures were in the upper
teens. For all missions the mean bottom temperatures were between 14 and 19 degree C.
The summer deployments show a two layer structure previously observed off the New
Jersey coast with a warmer fresher layer separated from a colder saltier layer by a very
strong thermocline approximately midway through the water column (Figure 5). During
the October deployment in 2011, the water column had already transit!oned from summer
stratified conditions to late fall/winter mixed conditions (Figure 5, upper right). During
the first deployment of 2012 (June), the stratification was just beginning to strengthen
(Figure 5, middle left). The two 2011 deployments show the late season transition from
the strong stratified summer to the mixed fall. The strong rapid mixing due to Hurricane
Irene initiated the breakdown of the thermocline at the end of August with a dramatic
cooling of the surface layer of over 7 degree C (Figure 5, upper left). The temperature
continues to decline throughout the water column over the course of the following
October mission. The 2012 missions illustrate the seasonal transition with the onset of
thermal stratification beginning in June, strengthening through July and August and
beginning to breakdown in September. This breakdown is seen in the deepening of the
thermocline and a cooling of the surface layer through the September mission. On
average the water temperatures below the thermocline are warmer in 2012 (Table 3). In
both years, the thermocline is 10 to 15m deep.
3.2 Salinity
The mean surface salinity varied from 29.7 to 31.9 practical salinity units (psu)
over all the missions. Bottom salinity was typically about 1 psu saltier (Table 3). The
structure of the salinity fields again highlights the predominance of the summer two layer
system with fresher water sitting above saltier water (Figure 6). Unlike the temperature
sections, the salinity data also shows the influence of the Hudson River with the freshest
water occurring mostly near the northern limit of the missions (left side of the panels in
Figure 6). In 2011 the most significant feature is the large slug of freshwater seen near
the surface and in some locations throughout the water column in October (Figure 6,
upper right). This is the impact of the significant rainfall that fell in August from
13
-------
Hurricane Irene and other storms that eventually made its way out into the coastal ocean.
This is the freshest water we saw over the entire project. In 2012, the four deployments
Ofl/15/11 08/20/11 08/25/11 08/30/11
Deployment 3 Safetfy
06.O8/12 06/10/12 06/12/12 06/14/12 06/16/12 06/18/12
Dvptoymnl 5 Santy
Owl 5/12 OS/I 7/1z 08/19/12 OwZ 1" 2 08«3n 2 06/25/12 06/87/12
Figure 6: Cross-sections of salinity for the deployments completed in August 2011 (upper
left), October 2011 (upper right), June 2012 (middle left), July 2012 (middle right), August
2012 (lower left), and September 2012 (lower right).
capture the seasonal evolution of freshwater inputs with fresher water near the surface
toward the north in the late spring (June). The surface salinity gradually increases
through the summer with the exception of a small slug of freshwater off Sandy Hook in
14
-------
August (Figure 6, lower left). The fall of 2012 had higher salinity waters found well
mixed throughout the water column.
07/t 5/12 07 CO/I 2 07/25/12
0*ptoyfWtt8 Dw«*r*
-------
were 3.0 mg/L less than the surface. In the remaining sub-sections we describe the
details of the observed variability in the DO fields within and between deployments and
years.
3.3.1. Spatial/Temporal Distribution
Similar to the thermal structure, the DO fields over the summer months were best
characterized as a two-layer system with higher concentrations above the thermocline and
lower concentrations below (Figure 7). The summer of 2011 was subject to a large
phytoplankton bloom that was interrupted by two significant rain events (Hurricane Irene
and the remnants of Tropical Storm Lee) while the summer of 2012 was much less
eventful. The lowest values were seen in July, August and September 2012 with some
M16-221: 2011-08-10 13:30- 2011-09-06 19:04 UTC
ru07-230: 2011-10-07 14:17-2011-10-27 12.05 UTC
4 6.8 10 12
0, Concentration (mg L""|
W07-350: 2012-06-07 15*8 • 2012-06-19 12:08 UTC
ru28-353: 2012-07-10 14:39 - 2012-07-30 13:04 UTC
4
0. Concentration Img I ')
O2 Concemralioo (rog L J
CU28-359: 2012-08-14 15:23 - 2012-08-30 12 55 UTC
ru07-367: 2012-09-13 16:26 • 2012-10-03 17 23 UTC
4
O; Concentration (mg L'')
216
0 Concentration (mg L )
Figure 8: Histogram of dissolved oxygen for the deployments completed in August 201 1
(upper left), October 201 1 (upper right), June 2012 (middle left), July 2012 (middle right),
August 2012 (lower left), and September 2012 (lower right).
values below 1 .0 mg/L. In August of 201 1, the lowest concentrations were seen near the
seafloor closer to the coast. This mission coincided with a large phytoplankton bloom
observed across the entire domain. Even with the large expanse of the bloom, the lowest
values, all above 3.8 mg/L, were limited to waters shallower than 20 m. Following
Hurricane Irene (August 28, 2011), the large salinity gradient, setup by Irene's rains,
16
-------
maintained the stratification into the fall. This maintained the boundary between the
lower oxygen concentration of the bottom layer and the surface. As the October mission
progressed, even this late stratification broke down and the lower layer readily mixed
with the higher concentrations of the surface layer. Over the four missions in 2012 we
see the progression from a relatively well-oxygenated water column in June with all
values above 4.5 mg/L (Figure 7, middle left) to a more bimodal distribution in the late
summer and early fall. The summertime lows in the bottom layer were 1.88 mg/L in July
and 0.94 mg/L in August (Figure 7 and 8). In general there was a tendency for the lowest
values to occur along the northern coast of NJ, within the 25-m isobath. During the last
mission in September 2012, the distribution of observations transitioned toward a more
oxygenated water column (Figure 8). For all missions, the DO concentration in the
surface layer was never below 5 mg/L and was seen as high as 12 mg/L. For the bottom
layer all DO concentrations were between 0.82 mg/L and 8.5 mg/L. From the two years
of data we can see that the late summer condition in each year both show a bimodal
distribution with higher concentrations in the surface layer and lower concentrations in
the lower layer. While the surface peak is the same between the two years, we do see
lower DO concentrations in the lower layer in 2012 (peak approximately 3 mg/L)
compared to 2011 (peak approximately 5 mg/L) in 2012 (Figure 7).
3.3.2 Decorrelation scales:
Since the glider is a non-stationary platform it is important to state that it is
simultaneously sampling temporal and spatial change. It is difficult to differentiate a
measured change in DO concentration as a change in time or a change in space when
looking at the glider data in isolation. Using autocorrelation we calculated the
decorrelation time and length scales for each deployment. The decorrelation scale is
defined as the scale, in time or space, in which the autocovariance coefficient falls below
0. These scales describe the time and space over which the DO variability becomes
uncorrelated. For example, a decorrelation length scale of 50 km indicates that the DO
observations at any point are correlated with DO observations within 50 km. Similarly, a
decorrelation time scale of 5 hours indicates that the DO observations at a particular time
are correlated with DO observations at that point for 5 hours before and after the
measurement. These scales can be used to guide the sampling required in time and space
to capture the variability of DO along the coast. For the remainder of this report, the DO
concentrations of the surface layer will be represented as those sampled between 3 m and
4 m below the surface and the DO concentration of the bottom layer will be represented
by those sampled between 3m and 4m above the seafloor. The average spatial
decorrelation scales for all the deployments are 67 km for the surface and 92 km for the
bottom (Table 4). This scale is approximately the length of a glider leg from offshore to
onshore and likely reflective of the persistent difference seen between the nearshore and
offshore dissolved oxygen vertical structure. The 2011 deployments showed similar
scales for the surface and bottom, all within 10 km of the project mean. The 2012 data
show a larger spread in the values of the length scales between surface and bottom as
well as between different deployments. For each 2012 deployment the surface scale was
smaller than the bottom scale. There is also a general trend toward longer length scales
in the bottom layer later in the season.
17
-------
The mean temporal scale across all deployments was 3.2 days for the surface and
4.6 days for the bottom layer. Similar to the space scale, the bottom layer had longer
decorrelation time scales than the surface. With an average glider speed of approximately
20-24 km/day, it would take the glider about 2.8 to 3.3 days to cover the mean spatial
decorrelation scale. While we feel that these temporal scales are more reflective of the
time it takes for the glider to move through the variation in space rather than a measured
local change over time, we do observe faster changes in time that are more episodic and
predominately due to mixing induced by local winds. Given this, the data suggest that the
sampling must resolve the spatial scales reported in Table 4 at a temporal resolution
sufficient to capture the effects of wind forced events.
Table 4. Decorrelation scales for time and space for each deployment. The scales are
calculated separately for the surface and bottom data.
Deployment 1:
August 2011
Deployment 2:
October 2011
Deployment 3:
June 2012
Deployment 4:
July 2012
Deployment 5:
August 2012
Deployment 6:
September 2012
Project Average
Space Scales (km)
Surface
62.0
76.7
77.9
49.8
97.9
38.0
67.1
Bottom
70.6
77.5
74.1
62.9
107.5
162.8
92.6
Time Scales (Days)
Surface
3.19
3.74
3.45
2.78
4.53
1.78
3.2
Bottom
3.70
3.79
3.24
3.70
5.53
7.81
4.6
3.3.3 Influence of Water Depth
For all missions the main influence driving the spatial and temporal variation in
the observed DO was water depth. As described above, the spatial decorrelation scales
were on the order of a single transect taken from the glider from either deep to shallow or
shallow to deep water. In order to confirm the influence of water depth on the observed
vertical structure of the DO we show the DO concentration for the bottom (blue) and
surface (red) data described above versus depth (Figure 9). For each mission we see
again the higher DO concentrations in the surface layer compared to the bottom layer.
With the exception of the first mission, we also see a consistent pattern in the vertical
gradient of DO with water depth. In the shallower waters the surface and bottom layer
DO concentrations are very similar usually between 6 and 8 mg/L. As the glider moves
into deeper water, the surface and bottom DO values diverge. This divergence is
primarily driven by increasingly lower concentrations in the bottom layer below stronger
stratification further offshore. The exception to this pattern is the first mission where
18
-------
OtctoymM 2 RU07 Sulaoi iRtd) ind Bottom IBkw
7 S«fac« (Rtdi «fxl Bottom (Bhj«>
10 15 20
Water Death
-------
2 RUO7: Vina SIMM IrrJn
'-i&m^:
DoptoymwK 0 HU07 Wnd
T2 u t6 18 20
Figure 10: The difference in dissolved oxygen concentration between the surface and bottom
layers vs. water depth for each deployment completed in August 2011 (upper left), October
2011 (upper middle), June 2012 (upper right), July 2012 (lower left), August 2012 (lower
middle), and September 2012 (lower right). The color of the scatter is wind speed (m/s).
there is little evidence of any dependence on water depth. During this mission the
conditions remained stratified from the shallow to the deep water. The specifics of this
first mission will be discussed in the following two sections (3.4 and 3.5).
20
-------
The influence of wind events on the structure of the DO relative to the depth
dependence described above is highlighted in Figure 10. These scatter plots relate the
difference between the DO concentration in the surface and bottom layers vs. water
depth. The color of the scatter indicates the wind speed. Once again the lower
differences (less stratified) conditions are found over the shallow water depths. The
larger differences between surface and bottom are found further offshore. For each
mission we also show the distribution of wind speeds relative to each observation. The
blue values are weaker winds (below 5 m/s) and the stronger winds (>10 m/s) are shown
in yellow to red. While there are cases in which the local winds are seen to reduce the
stratification in the DO concentrations (see Irene discussion below), the water depth is
seen as a much more consistent influence on the observed vertical structure. From this
we can see that the decorrelation scales described above largely represent the variability
observed as the glider transits from shallow to deep water or deep to shallow water. The
temporal scales are representative of the time it takes the glider to complete the transit.
Over this two year period we see a general structure in which the nearshore water are
well mixed with DO concentrations between 6 and 8 mg/L. As the glider moves
offshore, the water column tends to be more stratified resulting in a more isolated bottom
layer. It is over these deeper layers that we see the largest vertical gradients between
surface and bottom waters and the lowest bottom DO concentrations.
3.4. Event Response: Summer Bloom 2011
During the summer of 2011, there was a large summer phytoplankton bloom that
formed in mid-July and continued through August. Based on satellite imagery the
phytoplankton concentrations were highest along the southern coast of New Jersey and
extended well offshore and upcoast
(Figure 11). Our August 2011
deployment targeted this bloom as we
adapted the mission plan to cover the
entire coastal area to one that would
sample in and outside of the largest
phytoplankton concentrations (upper
left, Figure 5, 6, and 7). We redirected
the glider along cross-bloom transects
through the highest concentrations
observed off the central coast of New
Jersey. As the glider moved south, the
DO concentrations of the bottom layer
dropped from 7 mg/L to around 4 mg/L.
While the surface layer concentration
remained above 6 mg/L along the entire
path. Beneath the bloom the ocean was
clearly stratified with DO concentrations Flgure 11: Tme color image of the summer 2011
of 7 to 8 mg/L in the surface and 4 to 5 phytoplankton bloom. Image courtesy of the Mid
mg/L in the bottom layers, respectively. Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean
Based on the samples taken by Observing System (MARACOOS).
whomever 6 and 12 miles off the coast
21
-------
of Beach Haven on August 20, 2011, the bloom consisted of nannochloris oculata
(>200,000 cells/ml) and heterosigma akashiwo (8,000 cells/ml) (Based on laboratory
analysis of water samples taken by NJDEP, Robert Schuster, personal communications).
Based on Satellite imagery (not shown), the passing of Hurricane Irene pushed the bloom
up against the coast in late August before it broke up in mid September. Our deployment
in October, following the break up of the bloom, measured DO concentrations below 4.0
mg/L in the bottom layer. These lower concentrations, initially isolated from the surface
layer by the freshwater input resulting from Irene's rains, were mixed away by the end of
the October mission.
08/2G
08/28
08/30
08/28
08/30
Figure 12: Glider path during August 2011. The temperature (C) (left) and dissolved oxygen
concentration (mg/L) (right) collected during Hurricane Irene along the cross-shelf line at the southern
end of the path. The timing of the storm is shown as a red dashed line in each cross-section.
3.5 Event Response: Hurricane Irene
In late August 2011 Hurricane Irene tracked directly over the inner New Jersey
Shelf. The first deployment of this project captured this significant forcing event. Prior
to the storm passing, we modified the glider mission from the zigzag path toward Cape
May to one that maintained a cross-shelf line (Figure 3, upper left). The cross-shelf line
was timed so that the glider was in deeper water at the peak of the storm. In so doing we
were able to capture the evolution of the hydrographic (Figure 5 & 6, upper left) and
dissolved oxygen (Figure 7, upper left) fields before, during and after the storm. A
subsection of these data centered on the storm are shown in (Figure 12). A dramatic
impact of Hurricane Irene is seen in the temperature data. This section shows how
quickly the storm mixed the water column, transitioning from strongly stratified before
the storm to a deeper and weaker thermocline following the storm. This section gave us
our first look at how quickly the inner-shelf was impacted by a hurricane at this spatial
resolution. The impact of this rapid mixing and subsequent cooling of the ocean surface,
rapidly reduced Irene's intensity.
Similarly, the structure of the dissolved oxygen fields underwent a significant
transformation through the storm. Before the storm, there was a large gradient through
the water column with higher concentrations near the surface separated from lower
22
-------
oxygen values below the thermocline. The bimodal distribution illustrates this
stratification with the lower DO values of the bottom layer in the highest peak on the left
and the higher DO values in the small, more broad peak on the right (Figure 13).
Following the storm, the intense mixing weakened the strong DO gradient allowing
higher oxygen concentrations to penetrate deeper toward the seafloor. The distribution of
oxygen values in the pre-storm and post-storm sections shows a shift toward the middle
of the range (Figure 13). After the storm there are no observed concentrations below 4
mg/L or above 8 mg/L. There is still a bimodal distribution but it has shifted from the
pre-storm peaks of 5 mg/L and 7.5 mg/L to about 5.2 mg/L and 6.5 mg/L for the bottom
(left peak) and surface (right peak) layers respectively. The largest peak in the
distribution has also shifted from the lower concentrations of the bottom layer to the
higher concentrations of the surface layer.
Figure 13: Distribution of dissolved oxygen measurements collected in the above cross-sections before
(left) and after (right) the passing of Hurricane Irene.
4. Conclusions
With the effort of all on the team were able to successfully map the dissolved
oxygen concentration off the New Jersey coasts through 6 glider missions completed in
2011 and 2012. Each mission was carried out as prescribed in the QAPP document to
ensure the quality of the data collected. By following these specifications we documented
the required quality assurance steps for the AAnderra Optode, SeaBird CTD (pumped and
unpumped) and the glider platform itself. The missions were carried out with a predefined
path that was adjusted through consensus of the project partners to capture the variability in
the magnitude and structure of dissolved oxygen. Across all six missions, we observed DO
concentrations below 5 mg/L within the bottom layer, two of those saw concentrations
below 1 mg/L. The stratification setup by warm summer days was seen to trap this less
oxygenated bottom layer until wind events (both moderate and severe) mixed more
oxygenated water across this boundary. The sampling provided through the glider AUV
showed that the concentrations of dissolved oxygen were highly variable in the vertical,
horizontal, and through time.
The strongest gradients were observed across the thermocline with surface waters
23
-------
usually much more oxygenated than the bottom waters. These gradients were weaker closer
to the coast and significantly weakened following several strong wind events. Spatial
variability explained most of the variability with more mixed conditions in the shallow
waters near the coast and more stratified conditions in the deeper water offshore. It was
in the deeper waters offshore that most of the lower DO concentrations were found below
the thermocline. The scales of this variability observed over these two seasons was on the
order of 60-80 km in space and 3-4 days in time. We conclude that these decorrelation
scales are representative of the distance over which the water depth varied. The time scale
is more an indicator of the time it takes the glider to cover this distance rather than a change
across all space in time.
There were observed changes in time, predominately caused by strong (Hurricane
Irene) and moderate wind events that mixed the more oxygenated surface water with the
deeper less oxygenated water. During Hurricane Irene we saw rapid mixing of the more
oxygenated surface waters across the thermocline and into the bottom waters. In addition,
events like Irene and the coastal bloom in 2011 highlighted the capability to adapt pre-
determined missions to respond to these events. This allowed us to ensure that observations
were taken relative to the bloom throughout the storm. Since this was all done in real-time
the monitoring data was immediately available to NJDEP and EPA to inform their response
to these events. In the case of the bloom, the monitoring data guided NJDEP boat sampling
to further study the details of the bloom.
Based on these missions, we have begun to sample the dynamic coastal ocean
environment at the scales of known variability. The results show that while there are
persistent patterns in the dissolved oxygen fields associated with water depth and
stratification off our coasts, rapid changes can occur with varied responses across the region.
These results highlight the need to coordinate the high-resolution data sampled along the
gliders path with strategic point measurements in time. Based on these missions, a line of
at least two moored bottom DO time series stations oriented across the shelf would help to
distinguish the variability observed by the glider in space and time. These point
observations combined with the coast wide coverage of the glider would be able to identify
regions of low DO and characterize how they evolve through time. With these glider
missions we have begun to characterize the scales of variability. These scales can inform
State and Federal agencies as they refine criteria to assess the impact of low DO in the
coastal ocean in a way that accounts for its observed variability.
24
-------
References
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode Users Manual,
http://www.aadi.nO/Aanderaa/Document%20Library/l/Data%20Sheets/Oxygen%20Opto
de%203835-4130-4175.pdf
Argo Quality Control Manual, Version 2.6, November 2010.
Garau, B., Ruiz, S., Zhang, W., Pasucal, A., Heslop, E., Kerfoot, J., and Tintore, J., 2011.
Thermal Lag Correction on Slocum CTD Glider Data, Journal of Atmospheric and
Oceanic Technology, 28, 1065-1071.
Morison, J., R. Andersen, N. Larson, E. D'Asaro, and T. Boyd, 1994: The correction for
thermal-lag effects in Sea-Bird CTD data. J. Atmos. Ocean. TechnoL, 11, 1151-1164.
Ragsdale, R.; Vowinkel, E.; Porter, D.; Hamilton, P.; Morrison, R.; Kohut, J.; Connell,
B.;Kelsey, H.; Trowbridge, P. 2011, Successful Integration Efforts in Water Quality
From the Integrated Ocean Observing System Regional Associations and the National
Water Quality Monitoring Network, Marine Tech. Soc. J., Vol. 45, Number 1, pp. 19-
28(10).
Schofield, O., Kohut, J., Aragon , D., Creed, L., Graver, J., Haldeman, C., Kerfoot, J.,
Roarty, H., Jones, C., Webb, D., Glenn, S. M. 2007. Slocum Gliders: Robust and ready.
Journal of Field Robotics. 24(6): 1-14. DOI:10:1009/rob.20200
U.S. EPA, 2000. Ambient Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen
(Saltwater): Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras. EPA-822-R-00-012.
25
-------
Appendix A
QAPP
A-1
-------
—
Spatial and Temporal Monitoring of Dissolved Oxygen (BO) In
New Jersey Coastal Waters Using AlFVS
Data Quality Assurance Project Plan
Prepared by;
T. Kbhiit^Kigers project lead
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Approved by:.
Michael Borst, EPA project offlper, date
Approved by:
Darvcne Adams, EPA Region 2 project technical lead, date
by L-^UM:
Approved
Carol Lynes, EPA Quality Assurance Q£p|er, ^date { I
Approved by:
Robert Schuster, NfDEP technicaj point of contact, date
Approved by: /^T^^-Y^
John Kcrfoot, R^ers data liipf^gcmeat lead, date
w.
Approved by:_
Chip Haldeinan,T[utgcrs glider logistics lead, date
Revision Log
Revision Date
Reason for Revision
A-2
-------
2.0 Table of Contents:
Title Page
3.0 Distribution List 03
4.0 Project/Task Organization 04
5.0 Special Training Needs/Certification 04
6.0 Problem Definition/Background 04
6.1 Problem Definition
6.2 Background
7.0 Project/Task Description 06
8.0 Quality Obj ectives and Criteria for Measurement Data 07
9.0 Non-Direct Measurement (Secondary Data) 08
10.0 Field Monitoring Requirements 09
10.1 Monitoring Process Design
10.2 Monitoring Methods
10.3 Field Quality Control
11.0 Analytical Requirements 12
11.1 Analytical Methods
11.2 Analytical Quality Control
12.0 Sample Handling and Custody Requirements 12
13.0 Testing, Inspection, Maintenance and Calibration Requirements 12
13.1 Instrument/Equipment Testing, Inspection and Maintenance
13.2 Instrument/Equipment Calibration and Frequency
13.3 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables
14.0 Data Management 13
15.0 Assessments/Oversight 14
16.0 Data Review, Verification, Validation and Usability 14
16.1 Data Review, Verification, and Validation
16.2 Reconciliation with User Requirements
17.0 Reporting, Documents and Records 15
Appendix
A. Pre-deployment check out A-l
B. Pre- and post-deployment check out for the optode A-4
C. Deployment checklist A-6
D. Recovery checklist A-7
E. Post-deployment check-in A-8
F. EPA Method 360.2 (Dissolved Oxygen) A-9
G. Aanderraa Manual Appendix 8- 'External calculation of Oxygen' A-14
H. Glider Deployment Procedure A-15
I. Glider Recovery Procedure A-19
J. Glider Equipment Checklist A-20
2
A-3
-------
3.0 Distribution List:
Michael Borst
USEPA Office of Research and
Development
National Risk Management Research
Laboratory
2890 Woodbridge Ave. (MS-104)
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
732-321-6631
borst.mike@epa.gov
Darvene Adams
USEPA Regional Water Monitoring
Coordinator
Division of Environmental Science and
Assessment
2890 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08837
732-321-6700
Adams.Darvene@epa.gov
Robert Schuster
NJDEP Marine Water Monitoring
Leeds Point, NJ
609-748-2018
Robert. Schuster@dep. state, nj. us
Josh Kohut
Marine and Coastal Sciences
New Jersey Agriculture Experiment
Station
School of Environmental and Biological
Sciences
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey
71 Dudley Road
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
1 732 932 6555 x542
Kohut@marine.rutgers.edu
John Kerfoot
Marine and Coastal Sciences
School of Environmental and Biological
Sciences
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey
71 Dudley Road
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
1 732 932 6555 x527
Kerfoot@marine. rutgers. edu
Chip Haldeman
Marine and Coastal Sciences
School of Environmental and Biological
Sciences
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey
71 Dudley Road
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
1 732 932 6555 x523
Haldeman@marine.rutgers.edu
3
A-4
-------
4.0 Project Organization:
Josh Kohut - Rutgers University: Josh Kohut will serve as the lead manager of
the Rutgers component of the project. He will serve as the Rutgers point of contact and
ensure that all objectives as outlined in the contract are met. Josh Kohut will also be
responsible for overall project QA.
John Kerfoot - Rutgers University: John Kerfoot will be responsible for the data
management and quality control for each glider deployment.
Chip Haldeman - Rutgers University: Chip Haldeman will direct all logistics
related to glider deployment and recovery.
Michael Borst - EPA ORD: Michael Borst will serve as the EPA proj ect officer.
He is a member of the project team and will act as the primary point of contact for EPA,
oversee operations.
Darvene Adams — EPA Region 2: Darvene Adams will serve as the EPA Region
2 project technical lead.
Robert Schuster - NJDEP: Will serve as the technical point of contact for the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
All individuals listed above are part the project team.
5.0 Special Training Needs/Certification
All glider related tasks and data management will be carried out by the
experienced team at Rutgers. As of the award of this contract from EPA to Rutgers
University, the Rutgers AUV team has completed 259 deployments and delivered quality
data to local, state, research and federal agencies. Each member of the Rutgers team has
been trained both in the lab and in the field. At sea experience specific to glider
operation will be required for each deployment and recovery. At least one individual on
the vessel must be certified by the lead PI to complete the deployment/recovery as
described in appendix C and D. This certification will be documented in the deployment
checklist. Additionally experience with oceanographic sensors and sensor care of at least
one year or equivalent manufacturer training is required. Operation of the glider and all
calibration procedures require no specific certification beyond the experience described
here.
6.0 Problem Definition/Background
6.1 Problem Definition
The coastal ocean is a highly variable system with processes that have significant
implications on the hydrographic and oxygen characteristics of the water column. The
spatial and temporal variability of these fields can cause dramatic changes to water
quality and in turn the health of the entire ecosystem. Both the New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) -
Region II have prioritized monitoring the coastal waters off New Jersey in their long-
term strategic plans as an essential component of the decision-making process. Of
particular interest are the spatial and temporal characteristics of dissolved oxygen (DO).
Hypoxic and anoxic conditions ripple through the entire ecosystem causing fish kills and
potentially large disruptions to local and remote food webs. In response to this need, we
4
A-5
-------
have put together a program to augment existing monitoring with targeted deployments
of glider Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVS) equipped with sensors to map
coastal hydrography and dissolved oxygen conditions in near-real time along the New
Jersey inner-shelf.
The study area for this project will be the coastal waters off the New Jersey coast
between Sandy Hook and Cape May. The glider will be tasked on a zig-zag pattern to
cover the waters within the 3 nm NJ jurisdiction (Figure 1). The objectives of this project
are to monitor the hydrography and dissolved oxygen of these coastal waters. We will
deploy a Slocum-electric glider 6 times (three per year) during the stratified summer
season. The primary users for the data generated by this project will be the EPA and the
water monitoring division of the NJDEP. During each mission the real-time data will be
used to map dissolved oxygen and water column stratification along the New Jersey
coast. Following each deployment the full quality controlled dataset will be delivered to
the EPA for inclusion in their coastal data archive.
Dissolved oxygen thresholds developed by EPA, NJDEP and Rutgers are based
on the state standard of 5.0 mg/1 and the EPA criteria of 2.3 mg/1 and 4.8 mg/1 (U.S. EPA,
2000). These thresholds will guide the use of the data throughout the project. If the
glider observes values below the state standard of 5.0 mg/1, the EPA and NJDEP will
determine the course of action including possible re-task of the glider and deployment of
additional assets to sample the region. In addition NJDEP will use these data to evaluate
the adoption of the EPA criteria of 4.8 mg/1 and 2.3 mg/1 as a state standard. The high-
resolution sampling approach of the glider will also be able to bound these areas of low
oxygen in time and space to guide both the response to significant events and the
adoption of potential new standards.
Based on these thresholds, a healthy marine environment will be defined as
having dissolved oxygen values higher than the State standard and EPA criteria (>5
mg/1). Conditions become hypoxic when these levels decrease below the 5.0 mg/1 limit
(State) and 4.8 mg/1 limit (EPA). More extreme events defined by dissolved oxygen
values below 2.3 mg/1 (EPA) fall below the limit of juvenile and adult survival (U.S.
EPA, 2000). For this project and fact sheet
describing these conditions in more detail will
be developed and made available to those
interested in accessing the data.
6.2 Background
The Rutgers University Institute of
Marine and Coastal Sciences (RU/EVICS) in
collaboration with the NJDEP Division of Water
Monitoring and Standards and the EPA Region
II demonstrated the use of the IMCS Slocum
glider to observe temperature, salinity, and
dissolved oxygen concentrations off the coast of
New Jersey. These near-shore missions provide
continuous measures of ocean temperature,
salinity, and dissolved oxygen. In the summer of
2009, a single deployment was completed to
Figure 1: Glider tracks for the three
coastal runs completed in 2010.
5
A-6
-------
serve as a pilot. A glider was deployed on August 20, 2009 for 20 days covering 316
kilometers and generating 5,100 water-column profiles from the surface to near the ocean
floor. This deployment provided an increased horizontal, vertical, and temporal
resolution for dissolved oxygen in coastal ocean water conditions previously unavailable.
We tracked the evolving fields of dissolved oxygen and hydrography through upwelling
and coastal storm events (Ragsdale et al., 2011). In 2010, three missions were run from
late summer into fall. From late August through mid-November over 1,200 km of data
were collected in the waters just off the New Jersey coast (Figure 1). Procedures were
implemented to service the glider so that it could be redeployed in Sandy Hook, NJ
within one week of recovery in Cape May, NJ. Real-time hydrographic and oxygen data
was collected and posted to our public website and shared with Stevens Institute of
Technology for assimilation into their operational ocean forecast model. The experience
gained during these series of deployments has enabled us to customize glider hardware
and mission planning to operate in this challenging region of our coastal ocean.
7.0 Project/Task Description:
Glider AUVs: The research will use continuous ocean observations from a series of
glider deployments along the inner-shelf of the waters off the New Jersey coast. The
buoyancy-driven propulsion of these vehicles affords high efficiency and deployment
endurance approaching 30 days with alkaline batteries (Schofield et al., 2007). These
particular gliders have been operated jointly by Rutgers University Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab (RU COOL) scientists and Teledyne Webb Research Corporation
engineers in science experiments since 1999, transit!oning to sustained deployments by
the COOL Operations Center in 2003.
The vehicle preparation and deployments will leverage the significant federal
investment in the Rutgers University glider center. Initial glider preparation and
ballasting will be completed at the Rutgers center before each deployment. Throughout
the missions, the gliders will surface and connect via an onboard satellite modem to the
nil6Tran»CIO} 2010-10-08 13 16 -2010-10-25 IS 30 GMT
Figure 2: Temperature (upper right) and dissolved oxygen concentration (lower right) collected during a
coastal run along the New Jersey coast from October 8, 2010 through October 25, 2010
A-7
-------
glider center at regular intervals, typically 3 hours. These surfacings provide an
opportunity to download the most recent data segment from the glider and send new
mission commands as needed to the glider. The most recent data transferred back from
the gliders will be automatically processed in real-time and visualized on the lab website
(http://rucool.marine.rutgers.edu/).
Through this work we will run three (3) deployments per year between July and
September (inclusive) in both 2011 and 2012. Based on prior experience it is anticipated
that each deployment will take about 21 days to complete. For each coastal run, the
glider will be deployed off Sandy Hook, NJ and run a zigzag track down the coast toward
Cape May, NJ (Figure 1). The precise location of the track will be dependent on
environmental conditions and accessible water depths. Prior to each deployment we will
meet with NJDEP and EPA to ensure that the planned mission path meets their
monitoring interests. Along this track the glider will sample temperature, salinity, and
density from the CTD and dissolved oxygen concentration and percent saturation from
the optode (Figure 2). Data will be stored locally on the glider and a subset of science
data will be sent back to Rutgers in real-time via the satellite link. The subset will consist
of every third data point within every third up and down profile. The resulting resolution
of this subset will be approximately 0.9m in the vertical and 110m in the horizontal.
After recovery of the glider, all data will be run through sensor specific QA/QC
verifications outlined in sections 10, 13-16 of this document before delivery to NJDEP
and EPA.
For each deployment the glider will be equipped with two main sensors, a pumped
Sea-Bird CTD (Model GPCTD_and an Aanderraa Optode (Model 3835/5014W). The CTD
will sample conductivity, temperature and pressure a rate of 0.5 Hz throughout the mission.
The pressure will be used to calculate depth. These data will be used to map ocean
temperature, salinity and density along the track. The optode will measure raw phase shifts
across a calibrated foil that when combined with measured temperature from the CTD will
give measures of dissolved oxygen concentration and percent saturation at a rate of 1 Hz.
Project Timeline
Glider Delivery
Glider
Deployments (6)
Factory
Calibration: CTD
and Optode
Deployment
Reports (6)
Final Report
June
2011
X
July through
October 2011
XX XX XX
XXX
November 2011
thru May 2012
XX XX
July through
October 2012
XX XX XX
XXX
April
2013
X
8.0 Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data
The quality objectives for this project will be categorized as real-time and post
processed. The real-time data are those subset of data that are sent back to Rutgers during
the mission via the satellite link. The transmission is a data subset to reduce file size that
will 1) reduce time on the surface when the glider is most vulnerable to damage and 2)
7
A-8
-------
reduce the airtime on the expensive satellite link. During each deployment the data will be
logged locally on the glider with the glider manufacturer software on 2 Silicon Systems 2.0
GB flash drives powered by the glider batteries. The glider engineering data will be logged
every 4 seconds and the science data will be logged at the sample rate for each sensor (CTD:
2 seconds, Optode: 1 second). Following recovery of the glider the entire dataset logged
locally on the glider will be recovered and used to construct the post-processed dataset.
Geo-location for all glider collected data will be determined with an on board GPS,
three-dimensional attitude sensor (heading, pitch, and roll), two pressure sensors (redundant
depth) and an altimeter (height above the seabed). All sensors will be checked for accuracy
prior to and following each deployment as described and documented in the pre- and post-
deployment worksheets (Appendix A and E). If any values are found out of the acceptable
range reported by the component manufacturers, they will be recalibrated and documented
in the worksheets.
Precision
based on
manufacturer claims
Bias
Representativeness
Comparability
based on
manufacturer claims
Completeness*
Sensitivity
based on
manufacturer claims
CTD
Real Time
Temp.: +0.05 °C
Cond.: ±0.0001 S/M
Pres.: ±0.03 dbar
Bias will be
determined through
the direct comparisons
with simultaneous in
situ CTD data.
Data will represent the
vertical and horizontal
structure with
resolution of 0.9 m
and 120m in the
vertical and
horizontal,
respectively
Temp.: ±0.05 °C
Cond.: ±0.005 S/M
Pres: ±0.1 dbar
70% for all
measurements
Temp.: 0.001 °C
Cond.: 0.00001 S/M
Pres.: 0.001 dbar
CTD
Post Processed
Temp.: ±0.05 °C
Cond.: ±0.0001 S/M
Pres.: ±0.03 dbar
Bias will be
determined through
the direct comparisons
with simultaneous in
situ CTD data.
Data will represent the
vertical and horizontal
structure with
resolution of 0.5 m
and 120m in the
vertical and
horizontal,
respectively
Temp.: ±0.05 °C
Cond.: ±0.005 S/M
Pres: ±0.1 dbar
95% for all
measurements
Temp.: 0.001 °C
Cond.: 0.00001 S/M
Pres.: 0.001 dbar
Optode
Real-Time
Cone.: ±8^M
Sat: ±1%
Bias will be
determined
through the two-
point calibration
described in this
document.
Data will
represent the
vertical and
horizontal
structure with
resolution of 0.9
m and 120m in
the vertical and
horizontal,
respectively
Sat: ±5%
70% for all
measurements
Cone.:
-------
NJDEP data are hosted on local machines at Rutgers as part of other projects. These data
will be accessed directly from these machines using OPeNDAP protocols. The remote
sensed data will provide maps of currents and other sea-surface conditions to guide the
specific piloting decisions related to these missions. These data meet the quality criteria
required to guide the glider missions along the New Jersey coast based on assessments
generated by the data providers.
10.0 Field Monitoring Requirements
10.1 Monitoring Process Design
This plan is based on manufacturers recommendations, the scientific literature, and
our own experience collecting data from autonomous gliders off the coast of New Jersey
since 2003.
Deployment description: We will focus these sections on the coastal waters from
Sandy Hook to Cape May between the 5 and 30 meter isobaths. The Slocum glider that
we will use in this project transfers vertical motion generated by changing buoyancy into
horizontal motion on the order of 20-30 cm/s. The result is a saw-toothed pattern that
allows the vehicle to sample the water column from the surface to the bottom along its
glide path with high spatial resolution (on the order of 100m). This particular glider has
the shallow water capabilities and sensor payload required for this work. It is equipped
with a pumped Sea-bird CTD for hydrographic measurements and an Aanderraa Optode
for dissolved oxygen measurements. In addition to this sensor payload, the glider will be
a next generation G2 model from Teledyne Webb Research with significant durability
upgrades. The buoyancy drive configuration for this vehicle will allow it to operate in
waters from 5 to 30 meters deep. This shallower operating range will allow us to extend
the glider lines closer to the coast than in previous missions. The location and time of
the data collected by the glider will be recorded on board and transmitted periodically to
shore via the satellite link at each surfacing. The geo-location of these data will be
determined based on an on board GPS, attitude sensor (compass, pitch and roll), pressure
(depth) and altimeter (height above the bottom). Horizontal location will be determined
through a linear interpolation based on time of the data points between the known GPS
positions recorded at each surfacing event. GPS locations will be determined with an
onboard Garmin GPS (model: GPS15L-W) with a standard accuracy of <15m. This unit
has been flown on glider missions around the world including those operated by Rutgers
and The U.S. Navy. Time will be recorded on two separate onboard processors and
maintained through automatic synchronization with the GPS clock at each surfacing. The
pressure sensor incorporated into the pumped CTD will be used to determine the depth of
the measurement. These methods reduce the uncertainty on the sub-surface data location
and are consistent with those carried out on the previous 259 deployments completed by
the Rutgers glider team.
10.2 Monitoring Methods
All data related to this project will be collected using a G2 glider purchased from
Teledyne Webb Research customized for shallow water application. This glider will be
equipped with a Sea-Bird pumped CTD and Aanderra Optode. Prior to each deployment the
preferred path will be determined through a meeting between Rutgers, EPA, and NJDEP.
9
A-10
-------
The glider will be tasked along this path and programmed to sample the CTD at 0.5 Hz and
the optode at 1.0 Hz throughout the mission. A detailed description of the deployment and
recovery procedures and required equipment can be found in Appendix H, I, and J of this
document.
The primary mission of each deployment will be to sample the coastal waters
between Sandy Hook and Cape May. Two possible scenarios could modify this initial plan.
1) Weather-related mission modifications: In the event of a significant coastal
storm or high current event, the experienced Rutgers pilots will make
modifications to the path to ensure that the glider will not be put in danger and
can continue its primary mission to monitor the waters between Cape May and
Sandy Hook. In each case, Rutgers will forward mission changes to the EPA
project officer via email with copies to the project team.
2) Significant Hypoxic Event: If the glider identifies a region of low oxygen
(concentration < 2ppm), it could be retasked to temporarily suspend the mission
and survey the low oxygen area. Based on battery estimates this sampling
could be carried out for approximately 3 to 4 days without affecting the mission
duration. In this case, EPA will notify Josh Kohut at Rutgers of the interest to
suspend the primary mission and modify the mission waypoints. Rutgers will
then respond with an email to the EPA Project Officer with copies to the project
team outlining the details on the new mission path.
In the event of equipment malfunction or damage that will not allow the glider to
continue its mission, it will be tasked to remain at the surface until a vessel can be arranged
for recovery. Depending on the severity of the issue, the glider will be repaired and returned
to operation starting at either the recovery location to continue its previous mission or at
Sandy Hook to start a new mission. The starting location will be determined through a
meeting between Rutgers, EPA, and NJDEP and will be dependent on the length of the time
the glider is under repair.
Throughout the missions glider engineering and science data will be logged on two
2.0 GB flash drives. These data will be stored locally until the conclusion of the mission.
During the mission a subset of these data will be downloaded to a server on the Rutgers
network every 3 hours coinciding with a surface event. These data will be subset to meet
the criteria outlined in the table in section 8.0.
10.3 Field Quality Control
Before and after a given deployment:
Sea-bird CTD: The CTD will be referenced to a second, factory calibrated CTD in a
seawater tank before each deployment as part of the ballasting procedure. A second
reference will be generated with a full water column cast using the same calibrated CTD at
the deployment and recovery location. These reference profiles will be compared with CTD
profiles recorded by the glider. Using the satellite link, data collected on the glider will be
uploaded to the lab and compared with the in situ data. If the data comparisons fall within
the comparability criteria outlined in section 8 of this document, the glider data will be
distributed to project partners and users identified above. Following each mission the glider
10
A-11
-------
CTD will be cleaned as recommended from the manufacturer. Reference CTD profiles
taken at the recovery site will be compared to glider profiles recorded just before recovery to
ensure data consistency. All steps will be documented as shown in Appendix (A and B).
Aanderraa Optode: Before each deployment the we will confirm the DO sensor
factory calibration with the two point test (0% and 100% saturation) described in the owners
manual. The results of these tests will confirm the most recent factory calibration. Any
drift observed between the pre- and post-deployment tests will be used to linearly correct the
data in time throughout the mission. All steps will be documented in pre- and post-
deployment sheets as shown in Appendix B.
Analyte
CTD
CTD
CTD
Optode
Optode
DQI
Comparability
and bias
Comparability
and bias
All
Comparability
and bias
All
Field QC
Check
In tank CTD
SEE- 19 CTD
cast
Manufacturer
Factory
Calibration
Manufacturer
defined 2-
point test
Manufacturer
Factory
Calibration
Frequency of
Collection
Before and
After each
deployment
Before and
after each
deployment
Annually
Before and
After each
deployment
Annually
Acceptance
Criteria
Within range
listed in table
in Section 8
Within range
listed in table
in Section 8
Within range
listed in table
in Section 8
Within range
listed in table
in Section 8
Within range
listed in table
in Section 8
Corrective Actions
Suspect values are
flagged as described in
section 16.2 of this
document.
Suspect values are
flagged as described in
section 16.2 of this
document.
Recalibrate until data
quality meets criteria
listed in table in Section
8.
Correct data based on
test results.
Recalibrate until data
quality meets criteria
listed in table in Section
8.
Data post-processing following each deployment:
Prior to data delivery to NJDEP and EPA, all sensor specific QA/QC will be applied
including time offsets and thermal corrections. These techniques will be followed based on
the scientific literature and manufacturer recommendations. All processing will be based on
the extensive infrastructure already in place at Rutgers to support the 259 missions already
flown from the command center.
Sea-bird CTD: During the mission, 2 corrections will be applied to the real-time
CTD dataset: 1) The temperature and conductivity sensors on the instrument have different
measurement response times, thus the 2 independent measurements are aligned with respect
to time so that each CTD record represents a measurement on a single parcel of water. This
time shift is accounted for by the known flow rate of the pump on the CTD. 2) The second
correction results from the thermal mass of the conductivity cell and this effect on the
resulting salinity calculation. The CTD temperature is measured outside of the conductivity
cell while the conductivity is measured inside the cell. In addition, the conductivity cell is
made of borosilicate glass and is capable of storing heat from the surrounding water inside
the wall of the cell, resulting in a heating or cooling of new water parcels as they pass
through the cell. The result of this configuration is that the measured conductivity and
11
A-12
-------
temperature used to calculate salinity will result in erroneous salinity values, especially
across strong thermoclines. A method has been developed which allows us to correct for
this heating inside the cell, resulting in more accurate salinity profiles (Morison, J.R., et. al.,
1994). A description of the method with glider specific examples can be found in Garau, B.,
et. al.,2011).
Aanderraa Optode: The calculation of oxygen concentration and saturation is based
on the measured phase shifts from optode and the concurrent temperature values from the
CTD. We will align these two measurements based on manufacturer suggestions and
combine them to get the observed dissolved oxygen data. This will be done in accordance
with the manufacturers manual section titled : 'External calculation of Oxygen'. The
description is attached as appendix G.
11.0 Analytical Requirements
The analytical requirements for this project are restricted to the Winkler titrations
used in the 2-point oxygen tests to confirm the calibration of the optode. The analytical
methods and quality control for these titrations will be carried out as described in EPA
Method 360.2 attached as Appendix F.
12.0 Sample Handling and Custody Requirements
The samples collected in the lab as part of the optode two point tests will be
immediately transferred for the titration method described in EPA method 360.2
(Appendix F).
13.0 Testing, Inspection, Maintenance, and Calibration Requirements
13.1 Instrument/Equipment Testing, Inspection and Maintenance
Sea-bird CTD: The CTD will be inspected and tested as outlined in Appendix A.
This includes a visual inspection, instrument cleaning before and after each deployment
and comparisons with additional CTD data both in the tank and in situ during deployment
and recovery. These procedures as followed are outlined in the manual drafted by the
manufacturer.
Aanderaa Optode: The Aanderra Optode will be inspected and tested before and
after the deployment as described in Appendix B. This includes visual inspection of the
membrane to detect degradation, and 2 point calibration testing before and after each
deployment. These procedures will be conducted in accordance with those outlined in
the manufacturers manual.
Glider Vehicle: The glider itself will be inspected and tested before and after
each deployment as described in Appendix A and E. This includes confirmation of
proper operation of the gliders position (GPS), time of measurement (onboard
processors), heading (Compass), and depth (pressure).
13.2 Instrument/Equipment Calibration and Frequency
Sea-bird CTD: The CTD will be calibrated by the factory annually prior to each
set of summer deployments. This is in accordance with recommended annual factory
calibrations from the manufacturer. In addition to these factory calibrations, comparisons
will be made with in situ CTD measurements from another Sea-Bird CTD in the ballast
tank and with a concurrent profile in the field both before and following each
12
A-13
-------
deployment. These will be used to confirm the factory calibration.
Aanderaa Optode: The optode will be calibrated by the factory prior to each set
of summer deployments. This is in accordance with recommended annual factory
calibrations from the manufacturer. In addition to these factory calibrations, a 2 point
calibration will be conducted at Rutgers both before and after each deployment. This
test will be conducted as outlined in the manufactures manual. These will be used to
confirm the factory calibration.
Glider Vehicle. The three-dimensional attitude sensor will be calibrated as
required to ensure accurate measures of heading, pitch, and roll. These calibrations will
be no more than one year apart.
13.3 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables
Reagents used for the dissolved oxygen titrations will be purchased for each test.
All reagents will be purchased and utilized as prescribed in the test-kit manufacturer
manual.
14.0 Data Management
The data management for this project will be based on the considerable
infrastructure already in place at Rutgers to support glider operations. For each
deployment the complete dataset will be stored locally on the glider. In addition a subset
of the data files recorded by the glider in real-time is transferred back to shore via the
satellite communication system. Once the binary encoded files arrive on shore, they are
converted to ascii text using a set of unix utilities. These files are then archived to a
fileserver at the Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, where they are backed up daily.
The Matlab programming language will be used to process the raw data stream.
Scientific (i.e., temperature, conductivity, depth) parameters are merged with the glider
navigational parameters (i.e., GPS, timestamps) and are stored in organized data
structures, which are saved to the IMCS fileserver in near real-time. The following
quality control checks are then performed:
1. Duplicate timestamps are removed.
2. Invalid GPS fixes are removed using an algorithm that eliminates fixes that result
in impossible surface drift velocities (>10 m/s).
3. Invalid temperature and salinity values are removed based upon expected
hydrographic values that occur at the time of deployment (summer conditions).
Values more than 2 standard deviations outside these ranges will be removed.
4. Differences in the temperature and conductivity sampling are corrected by
aligning the measurements in the time domain based on successive profiles.
5. The aligned temperature and conductivity values are used to calculate ocean
salinity values and these values are then corrected for thermal inertia to get rid of
artificial salinity spiking (Garau, B., et. al., 2011; Morison, J.R., et. al., 1994).
6. Oxygen values from the optode are aligned by shifting them in the time domain
by a pre-determined number of seconds based on manufacturer recommendations
and confirmed by comparing successive profiles.
Real-time glider health and deployment status will also be available on the internet at:
13
A-14
-------
http://tnarine.rutgers.edu/cool/auvs
This webpage will include plots of relevant scientific parameters (temperature,
salinity, density, oxygen concentration, etc.) and maps showing the gliders path and
intended waypoints. These processed datasets will be made available in near real-time in
the NetCDF file format via the Thematic Real-time Environmental Data Distribution
System (THREDDS). While the glider is in its mission the real-time distributed data
will be considered provisional until the complete dataset is quality controlled after
recovery. During the deployment, if any of these provisional data fall outside the criteria
listed in section 8 of this document under 'real-time', they will be flagged and removed
from the data stream.
Once the glider has been recovered, files containing the full datasets are
downloaded and the previous steps are repeated, providing the end user with the complete
scientific and navigational data streams. All levels of these processing will be stored on
the file server and backed-up daily throughout the project. Upon completion of a given
deployment a copy of all data will be delivered to the EPA project officer with the
documentation described in section 15 of this document.
15.0 Assessments/Oversight
The calibration, testing, maintenance for each deployment will be documented.
This documentation includes:
1) a pre-deployment check out (Appendix A)
2) a pre-deployment check out for the optode (Appendix B)
3) a deployment checklist (Appendix C)
4) a recovery checklist (Appendix D)
5) a post-deployment checklist (Appendix E)
6) manufacturer calibration documentation
A deployment packet will be made up of all the above documents and a hardcopy of the
data. For each deployment the Rutgers team will ensure that all are filled out completely
and accurately. Throughout the deployments, EPA will be permitted to field audit the
project.
16.0 Data Review, Verification, and Usability
16.1 Data Review, Verification, and Validation
Josh Kohut and Chip Haldeman will ensure that all testing, maintenance and
inspection is completed before and after each deployment. These steps will be
documented and complied in the deployment reports described in section 15 of this
document. The checkout and checklist documents listed in the appendix of this document
will ensure that all steps are included. Josh Kohut and John Kerfoot will ensure that all
quality control processing and assessment is carried out on all real-time and post-
processed data prior to delivery to EPA. Any deviations from the QAPP/SOPs will be
documented.
16.2 Reconciliation with User Requirements
Following each deployment, the final quality controlled data will be within the
criteria described in section 8 of this document. If a value is found outside these criteria,
14
A-15
-------
it will be flagged in the final dataset. Each data point will be treated independently so
that any one point flagged will not restrict use of the other quality data from the same
deployment.
17.0 Reporting, Documents, and Records
The project will generate deployment reports and a final report. The deployment
report will document all glider and sensor preparation, maintenance, calibration, and
inspection. These reports will be labeled with glider name, deployment number, and
deployments dates. These reports will include all components described in section 15 of
this document. Two copies will be generated for each of the 6 deployments. The first
copy will be sent to the EPA project officer in both hard copy and PDF forms. The
second copy will remain at Rutgers with Josh Kohut the Rutgers project lead.
Rutgers will also prepare and submit a final report to the EPA project officer
documenting the results of the data collection, the validation/verification of the results,
and the final standard operating procedures conducted for all 6 deployments. This report
will summarize the information contained in the deployment reports described above.
Additional documents resulting from this work could include public and scientific
presentations and articles submitted to the peer review literature. The real-time and post
processed data for each mission will be maintained on the Rutgers file server described in
Section 14.0 of this document for at least 7 years following the conclusion of each
deployment. The documentation will also be retained in electronic and hardcopy forms
for at least 7 years following the each deployment. The 7 year time horizon in consistent
with NJDEP standards.
References
Garau, B., Ruiz, S., Zhang, W.G., Pascual, A., Heslop, E., Kerfoot, I, Tintore, 1, 2011:
Thermal Lag Correction on Slocum CTD Glider Data. J., Atmos. Ocean. Technol.,
in press.
Morison, J., R. Andersen, N. Larson, E. D'Asaro, and T. Boyd, 1994: The correction
for thermal-lag effects in Sea-Bird CTD data. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.., 11,
1151-1164.
Ragsdale, Rob; Vowinkel, Eric; Porter, Dwayne; Hamilton, Pixie; Morrison, Ru; Kohut,
Josh; Connell, Bob; Kelsey, Heath; Trowbridge, Phil Trowbridge. 2011,
Successful Integration Efforts in Water Quality From the Integrated Ocean
Observing System Regional Associations and the National Water Quality
Monitoring Network, Marine Technology Society Journal, Volume 45, Number 1,
January/February 2011 , pp. 19-28(10).
Schofield, O., Kohut, J., Aragon , D., Creed, L., Graver, J., Haldeman, C., Kerfoot, J.,
Roarty, H., Jones, C., Webb, D., Glenn, S. M. 2007. Slocum Gliders: Robust and
ready. Journal of Field Robotics. 24(6): 1-14. DOI: 10:1009/rob. 20200
U.S. EPA, 2000. Ambient Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen
(Saltwater): Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras. EPA-822-R-00-012.
15
A-16
-------
GLIDER
PREPARER
PREP DATE
LOCATION
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK
Check pump threaded rod (grease)
Check pitch battery threaded rod (grease)
Leak detect in place, batteries secure, white guides free,
no metal shavings, bottles installed, grounded?
PAYLOAD CHECK
Science Bay Instrument Serial Numbers
1
2
3
4
5
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD joint, no leak at pucks
Grounded?
Science Bay Weight Configuration
AFT CHECK
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #)
1
Flash card old files removed?
Inspect strain on connectors (damaged connectors as well),
Persistor power supply cable secure, battery secured,
ballast bottle in place, aft cap clear of leak, grounded?
Battery check (using load?)
1. Attach aft battery pack, verify voltage at J13
2. Disconnect aft battery
3. Screw in aft connector
4. Connect pitch battery, verify voltage at J13
5. Disconnect pitch battery
6. Screw in fore connector, verify voltage at J13
7. Attach pitch battery
8. Attach aft battery
9. Verify voltage at J31 (simple probe)
POST-SEAL
GENERAL
A-17
-------
Pick Point Present?
Special Instruments Present?
HARDWARE
Nose Cone and pump bladder inspection
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirping
Corrosion Prevention & Anode Check
Anode Style/Weight
Glider Parts Grounded (stickers)
Ejection weight assembly OK and unseized?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear)
Aft sensor
Payload sensor
POWERED
Verify Argos ping
Wiggle for 5 minutes
Record m_battery once stabilized
Record m vacuum @ temperature @ ballast
OUTSIDE T
Record compass reading
GPS check? (40 28.75, 74 26.25)
Iridium connect
zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
SOFTWARE
GENERAL
Version
Date ok, delete old logs
Re-burn latest software image
mdblist.dat, mi, ma, science!
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
if ver < 7.0 configure sbdlist.dat
\MAFILES
gotoJIO.ma (set x_last_...)
I AUTOEXEC.MI |
Phone Number
Main is RUDIC, altisTWR
u_iridium_failover_retries = 10
c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
In Gliderdos, reset glider to test settings
get f_max_working_depth (102 m)
f_ballast_pumped_deadz_width = 30?
CACHE MANAGEMENT (DONE ON DOCKSERVER!)
(this step is very important!)
del ..\state\cache\*.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ..\state\cache\*.cac
A-18
-------
send *.mbd *.sbd *.tbd
' Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the software image
locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass freewave transfer of the files. Save
these files or prepare the to-glider with these f
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_all_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
OPTODE
Check in completed?
Remove any shielding
PUCK1
Puck Type
Verify Darkcounts
PUCK 2
Puck Type
Verify Darkcounts
PUCKS
Puck Type
Verify Darkcounts
A-19
-------
HUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE:
Previous:
Slocu Glide Aanderaa Optode Chec IN/OUT
Poin Calibration & Calibratio Coeffcient Record
OPTODE MODEL SN:
IN OUT
PERFORMED BY:
Current:
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
CSCoef
C4Coef
5.3E+03
-2.9E+02
6.5E+00
-6.7E-02
2.7E-04
-1.9E+02
9.7E+00
-2.0E-01
1.9E-03
-6.8E-06
4.1E+00
-2.1E-01
4.5E-03
-4.4E-05
1.7E-07
-3.8E-02
2.0E-03
-4.3E-05
4.3E-07
-1.6E-09
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
CSCoef
C4Coef
5.3E+03
-2.9E+02
6.5E+00
-6.7E-02
2.7E-04
-1.9E+02
9.7E+00
-2.0E-01
1.9E-03
-6.8E-06
4.1E+00
-2.1E-01
4.5E-03
-4.4E-05
1.7E-07
-3.8E-02
2.0E-03
-4.3E-05
4.3E-07
-1.6E-09
Delta:
0.0
point Calibration
0% Point
Solution:
Na2SO3
H2O
Temperature
Air Pressure
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
100 Point
Solution:
Na2SO3
H2O
Temperature
Air Pressure
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE:
Wphase
Results:
OPTODE:
% Saturation
Temperature
Wphase
% Saturation
Temperature
WINKLER:
Calculated Concentration
Calculated % Saturation
% Saturation
WINKLER:
Concentration
Calculated Concentration
Calculated % Saturation
% Saturation
Concentration
In-Ai Saturatio Check
SATURATION:
TEMP
PRESS
Paste Sample Report
Rutgers COO Optode Check IN/OUT
4/15/113:0 P
A-20
-------
Protect
PhaseCoef
TempCoef
FoiINo
COCoef
CICoef
C2Coef
C3Coef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAirPhase
CalAirTemp
CalAirPress
CalZeroPha
CalZeroTerr
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIODelay
SoftwareVe
SoftwareBu
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
0
1.915733
21.16457
1707
5326.502
-292.0675
6.475949
-0.066929
0.000265
35
31.09332
9.937991
1005.22
65.60457
19.1812
2
0
100
-1
3
11
Rutgers COO Optode Check IN/OUT
A-21
4/15/113:0 P
-------
Glider
Date
Pilots
Laptop
Where
vehicle Powemp: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min glider
will go into mission, as well as
on powerup!)
In Water
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status.mi
zero_ocean_pressure
run Odctd.mi (with or without float, ask RU)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run 100 tn.mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
LAT:
LON
Perform CTD Comparison CAST [
get m_battery
get m_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
reports boot application
[mission completed normally?
(this can be run the night before or at dock)
Jwhile glider in water
I Iglider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
(would say don't need float for ru06, ru07 use it the first deployment) (can skip this if you
want for multiple deployments)
J"send *.sbd" is most important
(this applies moreso to when handoffed to iridium)
[sequence 100_tn.mi(5)
Jtypically done with RU provided SB19 or Cast Away CTD
-------
Glider Date
Pilots Where
Laptop
Recovery
get Lat/Lon from email or shore ^
support
obtain freewave comms ^
obtain lat/lon with where command
Perform CTD Comparison CAST |
LAT: LON:
1
1
1
(note instrument type!)
A-23
-------
RUTGERS
Slocum Glider Check-IN
Coastal Ocean DATE:
Observation Lab
GLIDER: SB:
Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and remove altimeter or leave temporarily attached
3. Retract pump
4. Remove altimeter and hose diaphragm removing all sand, sediment, bio oils
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter
Tail cone
1. Remove tail cone
2. Hose and clean anode and air bladder making sure air bladder is completely clean
3. Clean cowling
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down
Tail plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean plug if especially dirty
2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly insert and remove to clean the glider plug
3. Compress air glider female connector
4. Lightly silicon red plug and replace in glider once silicon has been dispersed evenly in
the plugs.
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SB 19 Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: Temperature:
Conductivity: Conductivity:
CTD Maintenance (reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1% Triton X-100 solution
2. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500 - 1000 ppm bleach solution
3. Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
4. Repeat comparison test if results not within T < .01 C, C < .005 S/m
Static Tank Test
SB 19 Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: Temperature:
Conductivity: Conductivity:
A-24
-------
METHOD #: 360.2 Approved for NPDES (Issued 1971)
TITLE: Oxygen, Dissolved (Modified Winkler, Full-Bottle
Technique)
ANALYTE: CAS # O Oxygen 7782-44-7
INSTRUMENTATION: Titration, Probe
STORET No. 00300
1.0 Scope and Application
1.1 This method is applicable for use with most wastewaters and streams that
contain nitrate nitrogen and not more than 1 mg/L of ferrous iron. Other
reducing or oxidizing materials should be absent. If 1 mL of fluoride solution
is added before acidifying the sample and there is no delay in titration, the
method is also applicable in the presence of 100 200 mg/L ferric iron.
1.2 The Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Probe technique gives comparable results on all
samples types.
1.3 The azide modification is not applicable under the following conditions: (a)
samples containing sulfite, thiosulfate, polythionate, appreciable quantities of
free chlorine or hypochlorite; (b) samples high in suspended solids; (c) samples
containing organic substances which are readily oxidized in a highly alkaline
solution, or which are oxidized by free iodine in an acid solution; (d) untreated
domestic sewage; (e) biological floes; and (f) where sample color interferes with
endpoint detection. In instances where the azide modification is not applicable,
the DO probe should be used.
2.0 Summary of Method
2.1 The sample is treated with manganous sulfate, potassium hydroxide, and
potassium iodide (the latter two reagents combined in one solution) and finally
sulfuric acid. The initial precipitate of manganous hydroxide, Mn(OH)2,
combines with the dissolved oxygen in the sample to form a brown precipitate,
manganic hydroxide, MnO(OH)2,. Upon acidification, the manganic hydroxide
forms manganic sulfate which acts as an oxidizing agent to release free iodine
from the potassium iodide. The iodine, which is stoichiometrically equivalent
to the dissolved oxygen in the sample is then titrated with sodium thiosulfate
or phenylarsine oxide (PAO).
3.0 Interferences
3.1 There are a number of interferences to the dissolved oxygen test, including
oxidizing and reducing agents, nitrate ion, ferrous iron, and organic matter.
3.2 Various modifications of the original Winkler procedure for dissolved oxygen
have been developed to compensate for or eliminate interferences. The
Alsterberg modification is commonly used to successfully eliminate the nitrite
A-25
-------
interference, the Rideal-Stewart modification is designed to eliminate ferrous
iron interference, and the Theriault procedure is used to compensate for high
concentration of organic materials.
3.3 Most of the common interferences in the Winkler procedure may be overcome
by use of the dissolved oxygen probe.
4.0 Sample Handling and Preservation
4.1 Where possible, collect the sample in a 300 mL BOD incubation bottle. Special
precautions are required to avoid entertainment or solution of atmospheric
oxygen or loss of dissolved oxygen.
4.2 Where samples are collected from shallow depths (less than 5 feet), use of an
APHA-type sampler is recommended. Use of a Kemmerer type sampler is
recommended for samples collected from depths of greater than 5 feet.
4.3 When a Kemmerer sampler is used, the BOD sample bottle should be filled to
overflowing, (overflow for approximately 10 seconds). Outlet tube of
Kemmerer should be inserted to bottom of BOD bottle. Care must be taken to
prevent turbulence and the formation of bubbles when filling bottle.
4.4 At time of sampling, the sample temperature should be recorded as precisely
as required.
4.5 Do not delay the determination of dissolved oxygen in samples having an
appreciable iodine demand or containing ferrous iron. If samples must be
preserved either method (4.5.1) or (4.5.2) below, may be employed.
4.5.1 Add 2 mL of manganous sulfate solution (6.1 ) and then 2 mL of
alkaline iodide-azide solution (6.2) to the sample contained in the BOD
bottle. Both reagents must be added well below the surface of the
liquid. Stopper the bottle immediately and mix the contents thoroughly.
The sample should be stored at the temperature of the collection water,
or water sealed and kept at a temperature of 10 to 20°C, in the dark.
Complete the procedure by adding 2 mL H2SO4 (see 7.1 ) at time of
analysis.
4.5.2 Add 0.7 mL of cone. H2SO4 (6.3) and 1 mL sodium azide solution (2 g
NaN3 in 100 mL distilled water) to sample in the BOD bottle. Store
sample as in (4.5.1). Complete the procedure using 2 mL of manganous
sulfate solution (6.1), 3 mL alkaline iodide-azide solution (6.2), and 2
mL of cone. H2SO4 (6.3) at time of analysis.
4.6 If either preservation technique is employed, complete the analysis within 4-8
hours after sampling.
5.0 Apparatus
5.1 Sample bottles-300 mL ±3 mL capacity BOD incubation bottles with tapered
ground glass pointed stoppers and flared mouths.
5.2 Pipets-with elongated tips capable of delivering 2.0 mL ±0.10 mL of reagent.
6.0 Reagents
6.1 Manganous sulfate solution: Dissolve 480 g manganous sulfate (MnSO4»4H2O)
in distilled water and dilute to 1 liter.
6.1.1 Alternatively, use 400 g of MnSO4«4H2O or 364 g of MnSQ »4tf O per
A-26
-------
liter. When uncertainty exists regarding the water of crystallization, a
solution of equivalent strength may be obtained by adjusting the
specific gravity of the solution to 1.270 at 20°C.
6.2 Alkaline iodide-azide solution: Dissolve 500 g of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or
700 g of potassium hydroxide (KOH) and 135 g of sodium iodide (Nai) or 150
g of potassium iodide (KI) in distilled water and dilute to 1 liter. To this
solution add 10 g of solution azide (NaN3) dissolved in 40 mL of distilled
water.
6.3 Sulfuric acid: concentrated.
6.4 Starch solution: Prepare an emulsion of 10 g soluble starch in a mortar or
beaker with a small quantity of distilled water. Pour this emulsion into 1 liter
of boiling water, allow to boil a few minutes, and let settle overnight. Use the
clear supernate. This solution may be preserved by the addition of 5 mL per
liter of chloroform and storage in a 10°C refrigerator.
6.4.1 Dry, powdered starch indicators such as "thyodene" may be used in
place of starch solution.
6.5 Potassium fluoride solution: Dissolve 40 g KF 2H2O in distilled water and
dilute to 100 mL.
6.6 Sodium thiosulfate, stock solution, 0.75 N: Dissolve 186.15 g Na2S2O3»5H2O in
boiled and cooled distilled water and dilute to 1 liter. Preserve by adding 5 mL
chloroform.
6.7 Sodium thiosulfate standard titrant, 0.0375 N: Prepare by diluting 50.0 mL of
stock solution to 1 liter. Preserve by adding 5 mL of chloroform. Standard
sodium thiosulfate, exactly 0.0375 N is equivalent to 0.300 mg of DO per 1.00
mL. Standardize with 0.0375 N potassium biiodate.
6.8 Potassium biiodate standard, 0.0375 N: For stock solution, dissolve 4.873 g of
potassium, biiodate, previously dried 2 hours at 103°C, in 1000 mL of distilled
water. To prepare working standard, dilute 250 mL to 1000 mL for 0.0375 N
biiodate solution.
6.9 Standardization of 0.0375 N sodium thiosulfate: Dissolve approximately 2 g
(±1.0 g) KI in 100 to 150 mL distilled water; add 10 mL of 10% H2SO4 followed
by 20.0 mL standard potassium biiodate (6.8). Place in dark for 5 minutes,
dilute to 300 ml, and titrate with the standard sodium thiosulfate (6.7) to a
pale straw color. Add 1-2 mL starch solution and continue the titration drop
by drop until the blue color disappears. Run in duplicate. Duplicate
determinations should agree within ± 0.05 mL.
6.10 As an alternative to the sodium thiosulfate, phenylarsine oxide (PAO) may be
used. This is available, already standardized, from commercial sources.
7.0 Procedure
7.1 To the sample collected in the BOD incubation bottle, add 2 mL of the
manganous sulfate solution (6.1) followed by 2 mL of the alkaline iodide-azide
solution (6.2), well below the surface of the liquid; stopper with care to exclude
air bubbles, and mix well by inverting the bottle several times. When the
precipitate settles, leaving a clear supernatant above the manganese hydroxide
floe, shake again. When settling has produced at least 200 mL of clear
supernatant, carefully remove the stopper and immediately add 2 mL of cone.
H2SO4 (6.3) (sulfamic acid packets, 3 g may be substituted for Ji SO ) (1) by
allowing the acid to run down the neck of the bottle, re-stopper, and mix by
A-27
-------
gentle inversion until the iodine is uniformly distributed throughout the bottle.
Complete the analysis within 45 minutes.
7.2 Transfer the entire bottle contents by inversion into a 500 mL wide mouth flask
and titrate with 0.0375 N thiosulfate solution (6.7) (0.0375 N phenyarsine oxide
(PAO) may be substituted as titrant) to pale straw color. Add 1-2 mL of starch
solution (6.4) or 0.1 g of powdered indicator and continue to titrate to the first
disappearance of the blue color.
7.3 If ferric iron is present (100 to 200 mg/L), add 1.0 mL of KF (6.5) solution
before acidification.
7.4 Occasionally, a dark brown or black precipitate persists in the bottle after
acidification. This precipitate will dissolve if the solution is kept for a few
minutes longer than usual or, if particularly persistent, a few more drops of
H2S04 wiH effect dissolution.
8.0 Calculation
8.1 Each mL of 0.0375N sodium thiosulfate (or PAO) titrant is equivalent to 1 mg
DO when the entire bottle contents are titrated.
8.2 If the results are desired in milliliters of oxygen gas per liter at 0°C and 760
mm pressure multiply mg/L DO by 0.698.
8.3 To express the results as percent saturation at 760 mm atmospheric pressure,
the solubility data in Table 422:1 (Whipple & Whipple, p 446-447, Standard
Methods, 14th Edition) may be used. Equations for correcting the solubilities to
barometric pressures other than mean sea level are given below the table.
8.4 The solubility of DO in distilled water at any barometric pressure, p (mm Hg),
temperature, T °C, and saturated vapor pressure, fj, (mm Hg), for the given T,
may be calculated between the temperature of 0° and 30°C by:
ml/L DO = (P - * X °-678
35 + T
and between 30° and 50°C by:
ml/L DO = (P - ^ X °-827
49 + T
9.0 Precision and Accuracy
9.1 Exact data are unavailable on the precision and accuracy of this technique;
however, reproducibility is approximately 0.2 mg/L of DO at the 7.5 mg/L
level due to equipment tolerances and uncompensated displacement errors.
Bibliography
1. Kroner, R. C., Longbottom, J. E., Gorman, R.A., "A Comparison of Various Reagents
Proposed for Use in the Winkler Procedure for Dissolved Oxygen", PHS Water
A-28
-------
Pollution Surveillance System Applications and Development, Report #12, Water
Quality Section, Basic Data Branch, July 1964.
2. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31, "Water", Standard D1589-60, Method A, p
373 (1976).
3. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 14th Edition, p 443,
method 422 B (1975).
A-29
-------
Page 54 April 2007 - TD 21 8 OPERATING MANUAL - OXYGEN OPTODES
Appendix 8 Calculate the Oxygen Externally
If the Optode is mounted on a CTD and the CTD is equipped with a fast responding temperature
sensor it might be desirable to do the temperature compensation externally. This will improve the
accuracy when subjected to fast temperature changes (when going through a gradient). The
Optode must then be configured to output differential phase shift information (DPhase). Based
on this data and the temperature data from the CTD, the oxygen concentration can be calculated
by use of the following formula:
[O2 ] = COCoef + CICoef • P + C2Coef • P2 + C3Coef • P3 + C4Coef • P4
P is the measured phase shift (DPhase) and the COCoef'to C¥Coe/are temperature dependent
coefficients calculated as:
CxCoef = CxCoef0 + CxCoef, • t + CxCoef2 • t2 + CxCoef-t3
The CxCoefo-3 are the foil characterizing coefficients found in the Calibration Certificate for the
Sensing Foil 3853, and t is external temperature in °C.
An Excel sheet that includes these calculations is available by contacting the factory.
If the CTD is not able to receive the RS232 output, the Oxygen Optode 3975 with analogue
output can be used. The two channel "intelligent" digital to analogue converter supplied with this
sensor is able to output two channels of your selection (including DPhase). By setting the
Output property to -103 the Optode 3975 will output phase (10 to 70°) at analogue output 1
(refer to Table 3-4 at page 23).
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
A-30
-------
RUTGERS
v iocean Glider Deployment
Observation Lab
• Make sure you have Glider Deployment Checklist
• Glider equipment
• Spare wings!
THIS GUIDE FOLLOWS THE GLIDER DEPLOYMENT CHECKLIST AND
SHOULD BE USED AS A 2ND HAND REFERENCE WHEN DEPLOYING
1. Obtain control of the glider - do as so in class and the
general communications sheet. The enter button pressed
repeatedly will let you know if you are at a prompt.
2. Allow glider to call Rutgers - Once you have the following
dialog, it is OK to type callback xx to obtain better control of the
glider.
18631 Iridium modem matched: CONNECT 4800
18631 Iridium connected...
18631 Iridium console active and ready...
Vehicle Name: ru!6
3. bootapp - this is a crucial double check, entering the command
should report (if the vehicle resets, it was NOT in boot app
mode, obtain control after reset and continue):
Boots Application at OxE40000
4. confirm boot app - type boot
5. consci - This should switch the terminal control over to the
science computer, your prompt will change to sci_dos. If this
does not occur, call Rutgers or supervisor for further instruction.
6. on boat - run status.mi:
a. What is this mission doing?
i. This mission is checking general mission parsing,
input sensors, and GPS position.
b. What is end result of mission?
i. Glider should attempt GPS hits:
185.76 14 behavior surface_2: SUBSTATE 2 ->3 : waiting for GPS fix
185.84 init_gps_input()
186.15 sensor: m_gps_lat = 1754.2646 lat
186.21 sensor: m gps Ion = -6701.6409 Ion
186.31 sensor: m_gps_status = 0 enum
ii. Mission should complete with following information:
201.29 16 behavior surface_2: STATE Active -> Mission Complete
201.39 behavior ? -1: layered control(): Mission completed normally
201.46 behavior ?_-!: run_mission(): Mission completed:
MS_COMPLETED_NORMALLY(-1)
1/4
REMINDER : GLIDER'S WILL SIT IDLE 1O MINUTES BY DEFAULT, ISSUE A CARRIAGE RETURN TO KEEP CONTROL WHILE YOU DEPLOY
A-31
-------
7. Place glider in water
8. zero_ocean_pressure
a. glider should report that the pressure sensor has been re-
calibrated. This step is very important, and could be a
solution to problems down the line with pressure sensors
being out of calibration. This must be done with glider in
the water.
9. run overtime.mi: (SEE DEPLOYMENT CHECKLIST IF NECESSARY TO RUN!)
(Rutgers no longer runs this mission during deployments)
a. What is mission doing?
i. This mission tests an abort capability of glider
detecting time, and responding to a time limit.
ii. Tests buoyancy of vehicle, because it will dive
time limit
*
\
\ \ actual path
\ \ /
\ V
attempted path \ /
\ /
\ /
v
b. What is end result of mission?
i. Glider will dive but a time limit will expire and glider
will 'abort' the overtime mission.
ii. Glider will submerge for several minutes, witness it
surface by monitoring Freewave or computer
terminal.
iii. Mission will end with an abort, if you have glider on
terminal, hit enter to see if you are at a command
line. You should either witness the following:
233.32 ERROR behavior ?_-!: we_are_done(): At the surface, return (-
2)MS_COMPLETED_ABNORMALLY
233.40 behavior ?_-!: we_are_done(): Restoring U_CYCLE_TIME from
15.000000 to 4.000000
233.50 restore_sensors()....
Restored u depth rate filter factor from -1 to 4
233.59 behavior ?_-!: ~ ABOVE WORKING DEPTH
233.64 behavior ?_-!: drop_the_weight = 0
234.87 behavior ? -1: run mission(): Mission completed:
MS_COMPLETED_ABNORMALLY(-2)
iv. why? - That should indicate the reason for abort, in
this case, ms_abort_overtime in case you missed the
2/4
REMINDER : GLIDER'S WILL SIT IDLE 1O MINUTES BY DEFAULT, ISSUE A CARRIAGE RETURN TO KEEP CONTROL WHILE YOU DEPLOY
A-32
-------
above messages.
ABORT HISTORY: total since reset: 1
ABORT HISTORY: last abort cause: MS_ABORT_OVERDEPTH
ABORT HISTORY: last abort time: 1987-09-16T12:27:14
ABORT HISTORY: last abort segment: ru!7_ghost_deep-
1987-258-0-0 (0150.0000)
ABORT HISTORY: last abort mission: ODCTD7.MI
10. run odctd.mi:
a. What is this mission testing?
i. This mission tests the ability of the glider to detect
depth and abort for being in water deeper than it
thinks it should be in. The operator's task is to
witness the glider submerge and surface. This
verifies proper ballast of the vehicle. Occasionally
for certain deployments a float will be used on the
tail until ballast is confirmed.
b. What is end result of this mission?
i. Glider should dive and surface, this time aborting
just as in overtime.mi but for overdepth.
glider 'too deep' abort
ii. Attempt to witness the following at mission
completion:
172.03 ERROR behavior ?_-!: we_are_done(): At the surface, return (-
2)MS_COMPLETED_ABNORMALLY
172.09 behavior ?_-!: we_are_done(): Restoring U_CYCLE_TIME from
15.000000 to 4.000000
172.16 restore sensors()....
Restored u_depth_rate_filter_factor from -1 to 4
172.23 behavior ?_-!: ABOVE WORKING DEPTH
172.27 behavior ? -1: drop the weight = 0
173.46 behavior ?_-!: run_mission(): Mission completed:
MS_COMPLETED_ABNORMALLY(-2)
iii. If you do not see above, type why? and this should
indicate reason for aborting, overdepth. Note abort
count is now at 1-2 aborts.
11. Receiving data files from test missions:
3/4
REMINDER : GLIDER'S WILL SIT IDLE 1O MINUTES BY DEFAULT, ISSUE A CARRIAGE RETURN TO KEEP CONTROL WHILE YOU DEPLOY
A-33
-------
a. If you are on a terminal equipped with Z-modem protocol
you can transfer the files from the test missions to the
laptop.
b. send *.sbd *.mlg *.dbd *.tbd
12. Run the following missions:
a. sequence 100_tn.mi(5)
b. Ctrl-P - will hasten the process of running the mission.
ONCE THE GLIDER DIVES FROM THIS MISSION, RUTGERS WILL
OBTAIN CONTROL FROM THE NEXT SURFACING. DO THE FOLLOWING
ITEMS:
1. ONCE GLIDER DIVES, UNPLUG FREEWAVE MODEM POWER
2. NOTIFY/CALL RUTGERS ALERTING THEM YOU PLACED THE
GLIDER ON A 15 MINUTE MISSION
3. WEATHER CONDITIONS PENDING, TAKE A CTD CAST
4. WEATHER CONDITIONS PENDING, SLOWLY START STEAMING
HOME
5. CONTACT RUTGERS IN 20-30 MINUTES FOR A STATUS,
RUTGERS WILL CONTACT YOU EARLIER IF A SITUATION ARISES
4/4
REMINDER : GLIDER'S WILL SIT IDLE 1O MINUTES BY DEFAULT, ISSUE A CARRIAGE RETURN TO KEEP CONTROL WHILE YOU DEPLOY
A-34
-------
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
Glider Recovery
LAB
OPERATIONS CENTER
IMPORTANT NOTE:
GPS and Iridium antennas are shared. You must issue a callback
xx command to insure a timely GPS once glider communications are
established.
1. Glider will call Dockserver and issue its GPS location. These
should be used prior to leaving dock. Communication from
Rutgers personnel or an email/text message to Sat phone from a
Dockserver email can facilitate this.
2. Setup equipment, notably an antenna as high as possible on
boat.
3. Standby equipment waiting for connection as you proceed to
given GPS location. Shore-side personnel can be called for latest
GPS locations as well if need be.
4. Once glider is within range of the Freewave modem, issue
immediately a callback xx command.
5. type where, glider will respond with the following:
GliderLAB I -3 >where
Vehicle Name: ruOl
Curr Time: Tue Jan 8 20:48:17 2008 MT: 13931
DR Location: 3928.824 N -7412.074 E measured 13930.6 sees ago
GPS TooFar: 69697000.000 N 69697000.000 E measured le+308 sees
ago
GPS
ago
Location:
69697000.
000
N
69697000.
000
E
measured
le+308
sees
sensor:m_final_water_vx(m/s)=0 le+308 sees ago
sensor:m_final_water_vy(m/s)=0 le+308 sees ago
sensor:c wpt lat(lat)=0 le+308 sees ago
sensor:c_wpt_lon(Ion)=0 le+308 sees ago
sensor:x_last_wpt_lat(lat)=3927.492 13931 sees ago
sensor:x_last_wpt_lon(Ion)=-7413.635 13931 sees ago
sensor:m_battery(volts)=11.5033497532925 1.933 sees ago
sensor:m_vacuum(inHg)=0.0990272592008097 2.014 sees ago
sensor:m_leakdetect_voltage(volts)=2.49575702100992 1.886 sees
ago
sensor:sci_water_cond(S/m)=3 le+308 sees ago
sensor:sci_water_temp(degC)=10 le+308 sees ago
a. Note the highlighted region, this is the glider's GPS
location
IMPORTANT: note seconds at end of line, this is the age of the GPS
hit. It is important this be something reasonable, on the order of
minutes or seconds. OR ELSE YOU ARE USING AN OLD HIT OR A
NON-EXISTENT ONE. If there is no new hit, try issuing a callback 5
command, and repeat the where command until a hit is received.
Proceed to wrangle glider, report AThe bear is in the igloo../ to
shore.
A-35
-------
RUTGERS
v iocean Glider Equipment Checklist
Observation Lab
General
- q.
1. Freewave modem configured for that glider (see Freewave
modem configuration guide)
2. * Serial DB-9 Cable
3. ' / 12 V DC power supply for Freewave (or battery for freewave
with proper connector)
4. Computer with terminal software
5. DC -> AC converter (if needed/available)?
Recovery:
fr
1. V_^|\|-terminated coax cable for Freewave modem
2. IH900 MHz antenna for quick-securing to boat
3. Satellite Phone
4. Animal control pole, boat hook, or some controlling device (most
boats possess a boat hook for worst case scenarios)
5. Empty glider cart
6. Recent email or phone call to someone with access for GPS
location
7. Red plug for glider power-down
Deployment:
1. Glider Deployment Checklist
N-terminated coax cable for Freewave modem
3. IH900 MHz antenna for quick-securing to boat
4. Satellite Phone
5. Glider Toolbox(s) (if available)
6. Animal control pole, boat hook, or some controlling device (most
boats possess a boat hook for worst case scenarios)
7. Designated glider wings + spares!
8. Buoy with line (if Rutgers/operators feel is necessary)
9. SeaBird 19 for comparison cast at deploy location (along with
Sea Bird software)
A-36
-------
Amendment 1: Use of YSI CastAway CTD
The YSI CastAway CTD is a small self-contained lightweight CTD that is GPS
enabled. The flow through cell houses a suite of instruments that measure water
temperature, conductivity and pressure. The manufacturer specifications for each
parameter are listed in the table below. For more detailed information on the
CastAway please visit the YSI website at: www.ysi.com.
Conductivity
Temperature
Pressure
Salinity
(Derived)
Sound Speed
(Derived)
GPS
Range
0 - 1 CO,OCC wS/cm
-5° - 45° C
0-100 dBar
Up to 42 (PSS-78)
1400- 1730m/s
Accuracy
0.25% =5jL,-S/cm
0.05° C
0.25% of FS
0.1 (PSS-78)
0.15 m/s
10m
Resolution
1 pS/cm
C.01CC
0.01 dBar
0.01 (PSS-78)
0.01 m/s
The purpose of this amendment is to authorize the substitution of the SEE-19
described in the QAPP with the CastAway. Both CTDs will be used for side-by-side
comparison profiles with the glider at the deployment and recovery of the vehicle.
The small size of the CastAway permits a safer deployment/recovery in rough
weather or from a small vessel. In addition, the self-contained data collection
eliminates the need for a laptop and the required external power.
It will be the judgment of Josh Kohut the Rutgers lead on this project to
determine weather conditions require the use of the CastAway instead of the SBE-
19. The decision will be based on forecasted sea-state and vessel characteristics at
the time of recovery or deployment. The decision will be communicated to each
signatory of the QAPP in via email.
A-37
-------
Amendment 2: Use of non-factory calibrated Glider CTD
The purpose of this amendment is to authorize the use of a glider installed SeaBird
CTD that has not met the annual factory calibration criteria. In the case that
equipment loss and project deployment timeline does not permit the delay of a
lengthy factory calibration, a CTD that has not been calibrated within the last year
could be substituted given the following:
1} The substituted CT was factory calibrated no more than five years prior to
deployment.
2} The substituted CTD meets the requirements outlined in the table listed in
Section 8 of this QAPP relative to the SeaBird-19 (calibrated within the lastyear}.
If a CTD meeting these requirements is used in a given deployment, a statement will
be included with the deployment documentation. The statement will specify that
the CTD was not factory calibrated in the lastyear, calibration checks were
preformed, and the data meets the QC criteria specified in the QAPP.
A-38
-------
Amendments: Use of manufacturer-suggested replacement for
dissolved oxygen field titration kit
Verification of AAnderaa oxygen optode calibration is conducted via the azide
modification of the Winkler titration method, pursuant to EPA method # 360.2. This test
involved the usage of EPA compliant field kits manufactured by Lamotte Company,
purchased from Fisher Scientific. This kit (item # S45088) has been discontinued, but the
manufacturer has issued a replacement kit (item # S94979) that uses a liquid sulfamic
acid instead of a powdered version. This kit will be used to verify oxygen optode
calibrations for the remainder of this project. Methodology will remain the same.
Amendment 4: Use of multiple gliders to complete remaining
coastal glider flights
Losses incurred throughout the duration of this project have led to the usage of Slocum
gliders other than the glider initially purchased by the NJ DEP. The glider used for the
second coastal monitoring run, RU07, will be used again for this project, starting with a
coastal flight in June 2012. The glider purchased by the NJ DEP, RU28, was struck and
sunk by a cargo ship and later recovered. This glider has been rebuilt by the
manufacturer and is scheduled to be delivered to Rutgers by the end of May 2012. The
ability to use these two gliders interchangeably provides some flexibility in the project
while adhering to the standards in the QAPP. Glider RU07 can carry one of 3 payload
bays that will meet the standards set forth in this document for CTD calibration criteria.
Bay 1 is CTD and oxygen only. In addition to these sensors, Bay 2 carries one optical
puck (Wetlabs EcoPuck BBFL2-599, calibration date 29Jan2009), with two channels of
fluorometry (chl a and CDOM) and one channel of backscatter at 470 nm. Bay 3 carries
CTD, oxygen, and two optical pucks (BB3-796, calibration date 16Dec2010; BBFL2-
338, calibration date 1 !May2011) measuring backscatter at 470, 532, 650, and 880 nm
and fluorescence for chl a and CDOM. Data from the EcoPucks would be provisional as
calibration dates fall outside of the limits set forth in this document, but can provide a
qualitative understanding of the physical and biological coupling present during the
coastal monitoring flights.
A-39
-------
Amendment 5: Updated glider check-out lists
As the Rutgers glider program continues to expand, best practices and procedures are
often refined, pursuant to operational experience. As such, preparatory checklists are
updated to include new or more thorough procedures, as well as accounting for changes
from the manufacturer, such as software updates internal to the glider.
Attached are three documents that have been updated since the fall coastal monitoring
run has been completed. They are:
1.) Pre-deployment check-out (Appendix A)
2.) Deployment checklist (Appendix C)
3.) Post-Deployment checklist (Appendix E)
Appendix A has been updated with checks to avoid issues that we have recently seen in
the field, including uncalibrated compasses resulting in the inability to attain specified
headings and therefore necessitating recovery vs. continuing flight.
Appendix C has been modified slightly to include new preliminary test mission names,
aimed at reducing confusion on the part of the deployment technician, which can often be
students or those otherwise unfamiliar with the intricacies of glider operations.
Appendix D has been modified with the intent of streamlining the data backup process,
thereby removing single point failures.
-------
GLIDER
PREPARER
PREP DATE
LOCATION
SCIENCE BAY
SERIAL NUMBERS
1)
2)
3)
4)
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK
Check pump & pitch threaded rod
(grease & clean if necessary)
Grounded Nose?
PAYLOAD CHECK |
Special Sensors / Additional Sensors
2}
Grounded Parts: Fore Sci Ring
Aft Sci Ring
Science Bay Weight Configuration
Leak detect in place, batteries
secure, white guides free, no
metal shavings, bottles installed
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD
joint, no leak at pucks
CTD
"Other?
| AFTCHECKl
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #) (if not standard)
Flash Card: old data removed?
Inspect strain on connectors
(worn connectors), battery
secured, ballast bottle present, aft
cap clean/clear of leak
Aft cap grounded?
Battery check
Aft Pack-J13 Voltage
Pitch Pack - J13 Voltage _
Nose Packs - J13 Voltage_
AftEmer- J31 Voltage
POST-SEAL
GENERAL
Pick Point Present?
HARDWARE
Special Instruments?
Nose Cone and pump bladder
inspection
Anode size / remainder (est)
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirp
Anode grounded?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear) Ejection weight assembly OK and
Aft sensor unseized?
Payload sensor
POWERED
Verify Argos ping
Wggle for 5 minutes
Stabilized m_battery
m vacuum (5) T (5) ballast
OUTSIDE
Compass Check (reading @ compass) GPS check
1) dat)
(Ion)
2)
Iridium connect
Alt
3)
4)
logging on; rotate slowly 360,
logging off, plot data: 360 test
_zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
A-41
-------
SOFTWARE
GENERAL
Version Re-burn latest software image
Date OK? configure TBDIist
delete old logs NBDIist
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
\MAFILES
gotoJIO.ma (setx_last_...)
| AUTOEXEC.MI |
Irid Main: 88160000592 c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4 _
IridAlt: 15085482446 Calibration coefficients
u_iridium_failover_retries = 10 f_ballast_pumped_deadz_width = 30?
Reset the glider, observe any errors get f_max_working_depth (102 m)
I CACHE MANAGEMENT]
del ..\state\cache\*.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ..\state\cache\*.cac
send *.mbd *.sbd *.tbd
* Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the
software image locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass
freewave transfer of the files. Save these files or prepare the to-glider with these files
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN |
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_all_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
OPTODE
Check in completed?
-------
Glider
Date
Pilots
Laptop
Where
vehicle Powemp: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerup!)
In Water
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status.mi
zero_ocean_pressu re
run Od.mi (with or without float, ask RU)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run shallow.mi
or deep.mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
LAT: LON
get m_battery
get m_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
reports boot application
Imission completed normally?
Jwhile glider in water
Jglider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
J"send *.sbd" is most important
(this applies moreso to when handed off to iridium)
[(glider should dive and not reappear) (report to Rutgers or steam out slowly once it dives)
[typically done with RU provided SBE19 or Cast Away CTD
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Check-IN
DATE:
GLIDER:
SB:
Vehicle Powered
Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and
remove altimeter or leave
temporarily attached
3. Retract pump
4. Remove altimeter and hose
diaphragm removing all sand,
sediment, bio oils
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter
Tail cone
1. Remove tail cone
2. Hose and clean anode and air
bladder making sure air bladder is
completely clean
3. Clean cowling
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down
Tail plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean
plug if especially dirty
2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly
insert and remove to clean the
glider plug
3. Compress air glider female
connector
4. Lightly silicon red plug and
replace in glider once silicon has
been dispersed evenly in the plugs
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SBE19 Glider (SBE41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: Temperature:
Conductivity:
Conductivity:
CTD Maintenance if comparison is not acceptable (reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1.
2.
3.
4.
SB19
Temperature:
Conductivity:
Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1% Triton X-100 solution
Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500 - 1000 ppm bleach solution
Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
Repeat comparison test if above results not within T < .01 C, C < .005 S/m
Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature:
Conductivity:
Vehicle Disassembled
1. Check leak points for water or salt buildup
2. BACKUP FLASH CARDS in
/coolgroup/gliderData/glider_OS_backups///,
DO NOT DELETE DATA OFF CARDS
3. Change permissions on folder to read, write, execute for owner
and group, and read, execute for everyone
4. Remove used batteries and place in return crate
5.
Re-assemble glider with a vacuum
A-44
-------
Appendix B
Deployment 1
8/10/2011-9/9/2011
B-1
-------
Title Page Blank
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
x
COASTAL OCEAN
OBSERVATION
LAB
OPERATIONS CENTER
GLIDER
RU16
MISSION EPA - DEP 1
DATE
8/10/2011 - TBD
GLIDER DENSITY (in target water)
1021.50
kg/mA3
LOCATION
Coastal NJ - EPA/DEP
kg/mA3
RU COOL GLIDER BALLAST RECORD
2011_07_27 ru16 NJDEP run 1_ru28replacement (SH to Cape May).xls
B-2
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru16\2011_07_27 ru16 NJDEP run 1_nj28repteceggitISH to Cape May)£foMMENTS
Deployment
FPA-DFP 1
Glider
R1J1R
Date
7/27/201 1
Preparer
Chio
Air Temperature
20
—
BE
Ul
a
o
Q
S
w
£
m
m
£!§
li
w fc
5 o
* m
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling .aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
7315.7
4369.4
6429.2
4378.4
1147.2
18.7
8002.6
492.6
0
0
7627
9465
744.8
744.4
377.7
351.7
305.4
*New optode (sn 1024) is 57.3 g heavier
pulled Tpj out of aft bottle
should be around 8.4 kg
on bay
n/a
447.9-70.2=377.7
Tank Specifics Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1021.6100
21.29
-10.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0215
15.00
Glider Volume (ml_)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
50771
51769.8
1.0197
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
5
-22
Should Hang (in tank) (g) -51821005.26
Adjust by: (g) -51 820995.26
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -51740.87
Adjust Gilder Mass (entered volume) (g) 69.94
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0
#DIV/0!
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
volume 1 :
volume 2:
1 Ballasting Alternative (known
VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg 1 m3)
50.68
1827677.3
1020.1
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
#DIV/0!
40.4 mL
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru16\2011J)7_27 ru16 NJDEP run 1_ru28replacement (SH to Cape May).xls
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
| 1022152.111
Full Retract Scale Weight
Full Extend Scale Weight
djjjiginal Volume
Pump Size
Pump Size (retracted)
Pump Size (extended)
Ballast Pump Size
Glider Reported pump_volume Resultant Volume (in air/tank)
432
50771
0
50720.32528
50720.32528
% Matched
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
50.6747193
50.6747193
50.2518574
Max Density Range
0.00
1020.12
1020.12
+- sigma
Max Density (in target)
Min Density (in target)
'DISCLAIMER = make sure all values are correct, and accurate,
dependencies are exact dunk weights, tank density and
temperature, as well as units
Ballast Sheet
-------
10/11/2011
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
18,
GLIDER: RU16
DATE; 7/27/2011
ITERATION
TANK; C - 4.4592
(SB19) T-21.29
D-1021.61
TANK: C - 4.4565
(Glider) T- 21.309
D-1021,59
NOTES Roll - 0.007 radians
Ballasted: 1021.5
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19) _
TANK:
(Glider)
NOTES
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19) _
TANK:
{Glider)_
NOTES
2011_07_27 ru18 NJDEP run 1 fu28neplacement (SH to Cape May).xis
" B-5
Ballast Iterations
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
B-6
-------
GLIDER
PREPARER
PREP DATE
10 //
LOCATION
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK |
Check pump threaded rod (grease)
Check pitch battery threaded rod (grease) \S
Leak detect in place, batteries secure, white guides free,
no metal shavings, bottles installed, grounded? s
IPAYLOAD CHECKI
Science Bay Instrument Serial Numbers
2
3
4
5
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD joint, no leak at pucks
Grounded?
Science Bay Weight Configuration
AFT CHECK
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #}
Flash card old files removed?
inspect strain on connectors (damaged connectors as well),
Persistor power supply cable secure, battery secured,
ballast bottle in place, aft cap clear of leak, grounded?
Battery check (using load?)
1. Attach aft battery pack, verify voltage at J13
2. Disconnect aft battery
3. Screw in aft connector
4. Connect pitch battery, verify voltage at J13
5. Disconnect pitch battery
6. Screw in fore connector, verify voltage at J13
7. Attach pitch battery
8, Attach aft battery
9. Verify voltage at J31 (simple probe)
POST-SEAL
GENERAL
Pick Point Present?
Special Instruments Present?
-------
I HARDWARE |
Nose Cone and pump bladder inspection ,
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirping \/
Corrosion Prevention & Anode Check
Anode Style/Weight
Glider Parts Grounded (stickers)
Ejection weight assembly OK and unseized?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear)
Aft sensor
_ Payload sensor
POWERED
Verify Argos ping
Wiggle for 5 minutes
Record m_battery once stabilized
Record m_vacuum @ temperature @ ballast
OUTSIDE
Record compass reading . syl ft/If*** (~- tt>
GPS check? (40 28.75, 74 26.25) S
Iridium connect
zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
SOFTWARE
GENERAL
Version
Date ok, delete old logs
Re-burn latest software image
mdblistdat, mi, ma, science!
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
if ver < 7.0 configure sbdiist.dat
\MAFILES
gotoJ10.ma (set x_last_...)
| AUTQEXEC.MI |
Phone Number
Main is RUDIC, alt is TWR
u_iridium_failover_retries = 10
c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
In Gliderdos, reset glider to test settings
get f_max_working_depth (102 m)
f_baitast_pumped_deadz_width = 30?
CACHE MANAGEMENT (DONE ON DOCKSERVER!)
(this step is very important!)
del ..\state\cache\*.*
after "bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ,.\state\cache\*.cac
send *.mbd *.sbd *.tbd
* Qnftivara Rurninn Tine • if iicinn Drnrnmm nr Inral frtlHor r-nrw/ all tho ftloc frnm tha cn
-------
in i/i iwt*Gu miud, \*j\/y an u ic iirco IIWIH ti i
image locafly. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass freewave transfer of the
files. Save these files or prepare the to-glider with these f
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_all_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
OPTODE
Check in completed?
Remove any shielding
PUCK 1
Puck Type As/A-
Verify Darkcounts
PUCK 2
Puck Type
Verify Darkcounts
PUCK 3
Puck Type yt/y//f
Verify Darkcounts
B-9
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
B-10
-------
HUTGERS ;
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
locum Glider Aanderaa Qptode Check IN/OUT
! Point Calibration & Calibration Coeffcient Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN: MN# 5014W SN# 1024
IN / OUT OUT
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 8/9/2011
Previous;
PERFORMED BY: Chip Haldeman,
Kaycee Coteman
Current:
COCoef
CICoef
ttCoef
C3Coef
C4Coef
4.3E+03
-2.3E+02
5.1E-H30
-5.3E-02
2.1E-04
-1.3E+02
5.7E-KJO
-9.6E-02
7.2E-04
-1.8E-06
2.2E+00
-6.9E-02
5.2E-04
3.3E-06
-4.3E-08
-1.4E-02
1.9E-04
7.7E-06
-1.9E-07
1.1E-09
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
CSCoef
C4Coef
4.3E+03
-2.3E+02
5.1E+00
-5.3E-02
2.1E-04
-1.3E+02
5.7E+00
-9.6E-02
7.2E-04
-1.8E-06
2.2E+00
-6.9E-02
5.2E-04
3.3E-06
-4.3E-08
-1.4E-02
1.9E-04
7.7E-06
-1.9E-07
1.1E-09
Delta:
0.0
* Sodium Thiosulfate verified by Kaycee Coleman
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution:
15.0 g
Pasport device
26.94
995.15
Sample A
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Results:
OPTODE:
0.16 iiM
0
71.93
0.06
26.93
16 Cone
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (uM)
0.07 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER
DELTAS:
0.2
<.2
0.07
-0.04 Cone A
0.01 Temp A
Concentration (uM)
{Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
0 %A
100% Point
Solution: 0
Pasport device
10
995.145
Sample B
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Results:
OPTODE: 34.31
335 uM
95.09
9.93
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
330.78 Calculated Concentration
95.52 Calculated % Saturation
WINKLER: 326.56
-10.45
94.3
DELTAS:
4.22 Cone A
0.07 Temp A
Concentration
(Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
1.22 %A
In-Air Saturgtion^heck
SATURATION:
96.3
@TEMP
24.44
@PRESS
995.15
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
B-11
10/11/2011 2:24 PM
-------
Paste Sample Report
Protect
PhaseCoe
TempCoe
FoilNo
COCoef
CICoef
C2Coef
CSCoef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAirPha
CalAirTen
CalAirPre:
CalZeroPt
CalZeroTe
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRlODela
Software^
Softwarel
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
3830
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
1024
0
-1.51E+00
2.12E+01
1023
4.27E+03
-2.30E+02
5.06E+00
-5.26E-02
2.11E-04
O.OOE+00
3.12E+01
9.73E+00
9.81E+02
6.56E+01
2.26E+01
2
O.OOE+00
1
-1
3
11
1.14E+00
-3.06E-02
-1.33E+02
5.74E+00
-9.62E-02
7.15E-04
-1.84E-06
l.OOE+00
O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00
2.89E-06 ^4.18E-09
2.16E+00 -1.40E-02
-6.85E-02 1.89E-04
5.22E-04 7.71E-06
3.31E-06 -1.86E-07
-4.29E-08 1.11E-09
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
B-12
10/11/2011 2:24 PM
-------
Deployment Checklist
B-13
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
l(o
Date
8-/10
- „..„,
Where jyHQnrir
vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerupl)
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
In Water
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status. mi
zero_ocean_pressure
run OdCtd. (with or without float, ask RU)
get mjbattery
get m^vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
reports boot application
1 ^J [mission completed normally?
Jwhile glider in water
' \f [glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
(would say don't need float for ru06, ru07 use It the first deployment) (can skip this if
you want for multiple deployments)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run 100 tn.mi
| "V ["send *.sbd" is most important
j (this applies moreso to when handoffed to iridium)
[sequence 100_tn.mi(5)
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
Perform CTD Comps
73
arison CAST
ujo V\
typically done with RU provided SB19 or Cast Away CTD
-------
Recovery Checklist
B-15
-------
Glider RU16
Pilots
Laptop
Recovery
Date TBD
Where
get Lat/Lon from email or shore | |
support
obtain freewave comms
obtain lat/lon with where command
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
LAT:
LON:
(note instrument type!)
"As of date of submission, RU16 has not been recovered
B-16
-------
Post-Deployment Checklist
B-17
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Check-IN
DATE: _TBD
GLIDER: RU16 SB: 0055
Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and remove altimeter or leave temporarily attached
3. Retract pump
4. Remove altimeter and hose diaphragm removing all sand, sediment, bio oils
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter
Tail cone
1. Remove tail cone
2. Hose and clean anode and air bladder making sure air bladder is completely clean
3. Clean cowling
D
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down
Tail plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean plug if especially dirty
2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly insert and remove to clean the glider plug
3. Compress air glider female connector
4. Lightly silicon red plug and replace in glider once silicon has been dispersed evenly in
the plugs.
N/A
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SB19
Temperature:
Conductivity:
Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature:
Conductivity:
CTD Maintenance (reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1% Triton X-100 solution
2. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500-1000 ppm bleach solution
3. Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
4. Repeat comparison test if results not within T < .01 C, C < .005 S/m
Static Tank Test
SB19
Temperature:
Conductivity:
Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature:
Conductivity:
B-18
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode and
Seabird CTD
B-19
-------
TEST & SPECIFICATIONS
AANDIRAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
Layout No:
Circuit Diagram No:
Program Version:
Product:
Serial No:
3830
1024
1. Visual and Mechanical Checks:
1.1. O-ring surface
1.2. S olderi n g qu al i ty
1.3. Visual surface
1.4. Pressure test (60MPa)
1.5. Galvanic isolation between housing and electronics
2. Current Drain and Voltages:
2.1. Average current drain at 0.5Hz sampling (Max: 38mA)
2.2. Current drain in sleep (Max: 300uA)
3. Performance Test in Air, 2fl°C Temperature:
3.1. Amplitude measurement (Blue: 290-470mV)
3.2. Phase measurement (Blue: 27 ±5°)
3.3 Temperature Measurement (100 ±300mV)
4. Firmware:
4.1. Firmware upgrade
N/A
N/A
OK
N/A
OK
31.1 mA
192 uA
378.42 mV
29.78 °
-27.42 mV
3.11
Date:
Augusts, 2011
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
istruments. lac
182 East Street
Attleboro, MA 02703
Tel. +1 (508) 226-9300 email: infbUSA@aadi.no
&
an ITT .Analytics Company
-------
CALIBRATION CERWICATE
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
Sensing Foil Batch No:
Certificate No:
1023
3830 1024 2000
Product: 3830
Serial No: 1024
Calibration Date: August 5,2011
This is to certify that this product has been calibrated using the following instruments:
Fluke CHUB E-4
Fluke 5615 PRT
Fluke 5615 PRT
Honeywell PPT
Calibration Bath model FNT 321 -1-40
Serial No. A7C677
Serial No. 849155
Serial No. 802054
Serial No. 44074
1
Parameter: Internal Temperature;
Calibration points and readings:
Temperature (°C)
Reading (mV)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Giving these coefficients
Index
TernpCoef
0
2.11646E+01
1
-3.06342E-02
2
2.88984E-06
3
-4.17900E-09
Parameter: Oxygen:
Range:
Accuracy1':
Resolution:
Settling Time (63%):
O2 Concentration
0-500 nM v
< ±8uM or ±5% (whichever is greater)
< 1 fiM
< 25 seconds
Air Saturation
0-120%
±5%
<0.4%
Calibration points and readings
Phase reading (")
Temperature reading (°C)
Air Pressure (hPa)
Air Saturated Water
3.12009E+01
9.72549E+00
9.81020E+Q2
Zero Solution (NajSOj)
6.55748E-J41
2.25779E401
Giving these coefficients
Index
PhaseCoef
0
-1.50632E400
]
U4205E+00
2
O.OOOOOE+00
3
O.OOOOOE+00
n Valid for 0 So 2000m (6562ft) depth, salinity 33 - 37ppt
The calibration is performed in fresh water and the salinity setting is set to: 0
Date:
Augusts, 2011
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
Aaaderaa Data Instruments. IDC.
182 East Street
Attleboro, MA 02703
Tel. +1 (508) 226-9300 email: infbUSA@aadi.no
ATI II T Analytics Company
B-21
-------
CALIBRATION
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
Sensing Foil Batch No: 1023
Certificate No: 3830 1024 2000
Data from Cool Down Test:
Cool Down Test
•i _
§ 3
•0 7 j
2 2
1 1-
W 0 i
£ °
Hi 4
h
W 7 .
d -
< .
Product: 3830
Serial No: 1024
Calibration Date: August 5, 2011
**e
"-—
" — - "^^
i 3flO 40O fiftO RflO -l-OOO 1?(K1 14TIO Ififtfl Ifl
Sample No.
_ rp
sn 1 U24 1 emperatu re
- on
zu ,_^
O
• is e
^
9
a
•
Ofio 2
OUO fe
•5 ^
. f\
Max Error = 1.5175
SR10 Scaling CoeHidents:
At the SR10 output the Oxygen Optode 3830 can give either absolute oxygen concentration in uM or air saturation in
%. The setting of the internal property "Output"3), controls the selection of the unit. The coefficients for convening
SR10 raw data to engineering units are fixed.
Output = -1
A = 0
B = 4.883E-01
C = 0
D = 0
Oxygen (uM) = A + BN + CN2 + DN3
Output = -2
A = 0
B = 1 .465E-01
C=0
D = 0
Oxygen (%) = A + BN n
i- CN2 + DN3
JJ The default output setting is set to -1
Date:
Augusts, 2011
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Scr\-icc and Calibration Engineer
182 East Street
Attleboro, MA 02703
fltfl fa$tmments. Inc.
Tel. +1 (508) 226-9300
B-22
email: infoUSA@aadijio
I TT Analytics Company
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
AANOERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
KonnNo. 621 Dec 2005
Certificate No: 3853_1023_40408
Batch No: 1023
Product: 02 Sensing Poll PSt3 3853
Calibration Date: 18 August 2010
Calibration points and phase readings (degrees)
Temperature (°C)
Pressure (hPa)
O2in%
ofO2+N2
0.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
20.90
30.00
3.81
970.25
72.97
68.13
64.72
56.48
47.08
35.87
30.48
10.40
970.25
72.50
67.16
63.48
54.75
45.17
34.0!
28.83
19.94
970.25
71.81
65.72
61.63
52.40
42.67
31.74
26.79
29.39
970.25
71.02
64.27
59.79
50.16
40.36
29.73
25.03
38.67
970.25
70.09
62.70
57.95
48.05
38.33
28.04
23.56
Giving these coefficients 1]
Index
CO Coefficient
Cl Coefficient
C2 Coefficient
C3 Coefficient
C4 Coefficient
0
4.270 19E+03
-2.29730E+02
5.06402E+00
-5.26332E-02
2.10917E-04
1
-1.32724E+02
5.74242E+00
-9.62085E-02
7.15467E-04
-1.84088E-06
2
2.15630E+00
-6.85358E-02
5.22181E-04
3.31185E-06
-4.28646E-08
3
-1.40276E-02
1.88612E-04
7.70890E-06
-1.86124E-07
1.11120E-09
" Ask for Form No 62IS when this O2 Sensing Foil is used in Oxygen Sensor 3830 with Serial Numbers lower than
184.
Date: 3/4/2011
Sign:
Tor-Ove Kvalvaag, Calibration Engineer
AANOERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS AS
5851 BERGEN. NORWAY Tel. +47 55 60 48 00 Fax. +47 55 60 48 01 E-wail: fnfo6aadi.no Web: Wtp^/www.»adi.no
B-23
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Beltevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seablrd.com
Serv/ce |
j?Annrf 1
PM A Mil mhor 1
63738 1
Customer Information:
Company WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION Date 4/28/2011
i
Contact H [Peter Collins
PO Number TWR4570
Serial Number WEBB Giider-0055
Model Number I WEBB Glider
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2. Perform Routine Calibration Service.
Problems Found:
1. The conductivity cell was found to require cleaning and re-platinization,
2. Antifoulant devices were found to be dirty.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of trie temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Cleaned and replatinized the conductivity cell.
4. Performed "Final" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
5. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
6. Installed NEW AF24173 Aoti-fouiant cylinders).
7. Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, April 28, 2011 Page 1 of 1
B-24
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Bel lev ue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer:
HWEBB RESEARCH
CORPORATION
Job Number:
Model Number
|| 63738 |
U WEBB Glider |
(Date of Report:
(Serial Number: |
4/21/2011
| WEBB Glider-0055
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift.
If the calibration identifies a problem, then a second calibration is performed after work is completed. The 'as received'
calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients using the program SEACON. The coefficient'offset'
allows a small correction for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients
obtained after a repair apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Performed G Not Performed
Date: 4/12/2011
Drift since last cal: | +0.00012 [ Degrees Celsius/year
Comments:
'FINAL CALIBRATION'
Performed Not Performed
Date: | 4/21/2011]
Comments:
Drift since 16 Sep 06 | +0.00049 Degrees Celsius/year
B-25
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 21-Apr-l I
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = 3.207743e-005
al = 2,722827e-004
a2 = -2.066693e-006
a3 = 1.4990356-007
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
14.9999
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
611669.0
523780.4
335258.3
290693.0
233673.5
192748.1
168994.5
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
INST TEMP
(ITS-90)
0.9999
4.5001
15.0000
18.4997
24.0001
29.0002
32.4999
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
-0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
-0.0003
0.0001
0.0002
-0.0001
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al [/n(n)] + a2[/w2(n)] + a3[/n\n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
a o.oo
-0.01
-0.02
_L
I I I I
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature, Degrees C
30
35
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
16-Sep-06 -2.25
21-Apr-11 -0.00
B-26
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Apr-11
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = -3.406049e-005
al = 2.87692Se-004
a2 = -3.261384e-006
a3 = 1.807112e-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
611741.0
523843.0
335277.2
290706.5
233684.1
192758.5
169003.2
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4999
15.0002
18.4999
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al O(n)] + a2[/n2(n)] + a3[/n3(n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
o
a o.oo
-0.01
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0002
-0.0001
-0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
-0.02
1 1 1 1
*• at
»— — •
i i i i
•
i i
. <
IMI
i= 1^
I I I I
~ 4-
i i i i
5 0 5 10 15 20 2
Temperature, Degrees C
B-27
•-
i i i i
i i i i
• 16-Sep-06 -0.53
A 12-Apr-11 0.00
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer:
Job Number;
WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
63738
Model Number || WEBB Glider
Date of Report: |[
4/21/2011
Serial Number: ||
WEBB Giider-0055
Conductivity sensors ore normally calibrated 'as received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration is
performed after work is completed. The 'as received' calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients using the program SEACON. The
coefficient 'slope' allows small corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration
coefficients obtained after a repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION1
Date: 4/12/2011
j/i Performed
Drift since last cal:
-0.00030
Not Performed
PSU/montfa*
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER CLEANING & REPLATINIZING' 0 Performed
Drift since 16 Sep 06 [
Date: 4/21/2011
+0.00010
Not Performed
PSU/montfa*
Comments:
* Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatinizing tend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift in
post-cleaning-calibration indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit
B-28
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Apr-ll
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.922178e-001
h = 1.277352e-001
i = -1.7680506-004
j = 2.9379736-005
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.29J4 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = -1.2360e-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
15,0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.6460
34.6257
34.5827
34.5732
34.5624
34.5545
34.5481
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96279
3.26851
4.24598
4.58959
5.14502
5.66424
6.03450
INST FREO
(Hz)
2790.34
5566.06
5776.57
6402.67
6608.42
6927.81
7213.28
7409.92
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96280
3.26850
4.24597
4.58957
5.14503
5.66427
6.03448
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00001
-0.00001
-0.00001
-0.00001
0.00001
0.00003
-0.00002
f = 1NST FREQ * sqrt(1.0 + WBOTC * t) / 1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if + jf4) / (1 + 5t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure[decibars]; 5 = CTcor; E = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.004
0.002
CD 0.000
-0.002
-0.004
1 J II
^
iiii
^
-*-"
iiii
i i
^
*i.
. . L_
1
k
•
) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
B-29
_LJ_
| • | 16-Sep-06 0.9995235
FT! 12-Apr-11 1.0000000
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 21-Apr-11
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.9021560-001
h = 1.2723030-001
i = -6.6333330-005
j = 2.1546320-005
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = -1.2360e-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
14.9999
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.6758
34.6552
34.6115
34.6016
34.5899
34.5806
34.5732
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96510
3.27102
4.24913
4.59295
5.14866
5.66804
6.03837
INST FREO
(Hz)
2790.35
5569.15
5779.81
6406.34
6612.23
6931.84
7217.47
7414.26
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96509
3.27102
4.24914
4.59294
5. 14866
5.66804
6.03838
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00000
0.00000
0.00001
-0.00001
0.00000
-0.00001
0.00000
f = INST FREQ * sqrtfl.O + WBOTC * t) / 1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf") / (I + St + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressurefdecibais]; 8 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residua! = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.002-r
0.001
W
To" 0.000-
D
-0.001
-0,002-
t
r^
1 1 1 *
^
\,
If
:4 -
"*— -_
*.
^*~~+~~~~.
1 1 I I
A L
^
1 t 1 1
>
i
3123456
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
B-30
» | 16-Sep-06 1.0002245
"Sl21-Apr-11 1.0000000
CALIBRATION AFTER
CLEANING AND
REPLATiNIZING CELL
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 11-Apr-J 1
COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = -4.923020e-002
PA1 = 2.347635e-002
PA2 = 2.022392e-009
PTHAO = -7.057100e+001
PTHA1 = 5,142905e-002
PTHA2 = -2.0773286-007
WEBB GLIDER PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
508 psiaS/N 8731
PTCAO =
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 =
PTCBO =
PTCB1 =
PTCB2 =
PRESSURE
PRESSURE
PSIA
14
104
204
304
404
504
404
304
204
104
14
.72
.97
.96
.98
.97
.98
.95
.94
.96
.97
.72
SPAN CALIBRATION
INST THERMISTOR
OUTPUT
13.
3853.
8108.
12359.
16608.
20852.
16609.
12361.
8109.
3854.
13.
8
3
1
5
7
8
4
3
3
7
6
OUTPUT
1824.
1824.
1824.
1926.
1823.
1826.
1824.
1822.
1822.
1824.
1825.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14
104
204
304
404
504
404
304
204
104
14
.74
.92
.94
.97
.97
.95
.99
.98
.96
.96
.73
ERROR
%FSR
0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
0
0
0
-0
0
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.01
.00
.00
.00
-6.1386146+002
-3.6871586-003
-3.9648186-003
2.495538e+001
-1.250000e-004
O.OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
y = thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPA1 * y + PTEMPA2 * y
x = pressure output - PTCAO - PTCA1 * t - PTCA2 * l
n = x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB1 * t + PTCB2 * t2)
pressure (psia) = PAO + PA1 * n + PA2 * n2
0.50
0.25
3 o.oo
to
-0.25
-0.50
i i i i
i i i i
TEMP
ITS90
32.50
29.00
24.00
18.50
15.00
4.50
1.00
PRESS
TEMP
2020.60
1951.90
1852.20
1743.40
1676.30
1468.30
1399.50
INST
OUTPUT
26.99
27.80
28.83
29.53
30.62
31.16
31.19
TEMPCT.TS901
-5.00
35.00
SPAN(mV)
24.96
24.95
i i i i
i i i i
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
~" 11-Apr-11 -0.00
50
100
150 200
250 300 350
Pressure (PSiA)
B-31
400 450 500 550
-------
Appendix C
Deployment 2
10/6/2011 -10/27/2011
C-1
-------
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
x
JUDASTAL OCEAN
OBSERVATION
LAB
OPERATIONS CENTER
GLIDER
RU07
MISSION EPA - DEP 2
DATE
10/6/ - 10/27/2011
GLIDER DENSITY (in target water)
1019.60
kg/mA3
LOCATION
Coastal NJ - EPA/DEP
kg/mA3
RU COOL GLIDER BALLAST RECORD
C-2
-------
o
w, \ijuuiy i uu}j\u
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru07\2011_09_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
Full Retract Scale Weight
Full Extend Scale Weight
Original Volume
.
Pump Size
Pump Size (retracted)
Pump Size (extended)
Ballast Pump Size
Glider Reported pump_volume Resultant Volume (in air/tank)
376
-16
432
50926.429
385.984045
-193.41607
192.567979
-207
209
% Matched
107.8%
96.5%
4.5%
50733.861
51119.8451
50683.0133
Max Density Range
3.87
1023.45
1015.72
+- sigma
Max Density (in target)
Min Density (in target)
*DISCLAIMER ~ make sure all values are correct, and accurate,
dependencies are exact dunk weights, tank density and
temperature, as well as units
Ballast Sheet
-------
10/4/2011
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
BALLAST
FORE 1
FORE 2
AFT
NOTES
~/fl
-2o
-r
I.
-ZQ — 1
TANK: T- Zl-Z) 6 TANK:
(SB19) C- T.MrOl (Glider)
cdL
•«Q|0
•J
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB 19)
NOTES
~7Oc
- . c,
TANK:
(Glider)
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19}_
NOTES
ta
TANK:
(Glider) _
2011_09_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
C-5
Ballast Iterations
-------
.,
ire,
I oi
C-6
-------
9/30/2011
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19)
BALLAST
FORE1
FORE 2
AFT
NOTES
-Hi -IU
TANK:
(Glider)
J
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19)
BALLAST
NOTES-llk-rlV
TANK:
(Glider)
ITERATION
NOTES
a
^-4
TANK: T- Z-0-% | TANK:
(SB19) C=?-M^ (Glider)
^ "« C' I
^K
T-
!>" -- rof 5.
2011 09_2S ru07 NJDEP.xls
D' C-7
Ballast Iterations
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru07\2011_09_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
MASS fg)
COMMENTS
Deployment
Glider
Date
Preparer
Air Temperature
20
at
m
Q
j
o
0
o
£
1
DC
111
1
m
*§
|t
* CO
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, caid)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY {no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PfCK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
14503.9
6733.9
12209
1151.5
7514.3
438.7
9405
O
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1.0155
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
20.98 Total Mass (g)
238.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1,0205
15.00
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
50926.429
51956.3
1.0202
induced)
3
Volume Change (target) (mL) -21
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H -distance
0
107
#DIV/OI
(des)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (in tank) (g)
Adjust by: (g)
230.38
-7.62
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g)
Adjust Glider Mass {entered volume) (g)
-7.62
-7.62
• Ballasting Alternative (known
VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (In target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
50926.429
1020.6
1020.6
1020.65
volume 1:
volume 2:
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
G1 Volume
50926.43
50926,43
107 g air/66 g Water
40.4 mL Ba||ast sheet
50.9 L
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru07\2Q11_09_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
MASS (q)
COMMENTS
Deployment
Glider
Date
Prepare/
Air Temperature
20
GLIDER
PAYLOAO
BATTERIES
S'
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum.cowling.aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
iSStrt 1
— ~
01^1
IZ. Z-eAo
MS1.5
751H-5
*ft$.7
—
, —
14O5.0
—
—
—
«»
- —
. WvHc.
o
CD
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0200
21.64
-22.00
1.0205
15.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
50900
0
0.0000
induced)
6
-24
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0
107
#DIV/0!
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (in tank) (g)
Adjust by: (g)
-4.62
17.38
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -2. 1 2
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) 5191 9.32
A Ballasting Alternative (known
VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Gilder Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
21.566
0.0
0.0
1020.16
volume 1:
volume 2:
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
G1 Volume
#DIV/0!
107 g air/66 g Water
40.4 mL Ballast Sheet
50.9 L
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ru07\2011 J)9_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
Full Retract Scale Weight
Full Extend Scale Weight
o Original Volume
o
Pump Size
Pump Size (retracted)
Pump Size (extended)
Ballast Pump Size
Glider Reported pump volume Resultant Volume (in air/tank)
432
0
0
-423.52941
50900 |
% Matched
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
3DIV/0!
Max Density Range
+- sigma
Max Density (in target)
Min Density (in target)
*DISCLAIMER = make sure all values are correct, and accurate,
dependencies are exact dunk weights, tank density and
temperature, as well as units
Ballast Sheet
-------
9/27/2011
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19)
BALLAST
NOTES
TANK:
(Glider) (j-H-
ITERATION J~
TANK:
(SB19)
BALLAST
TANK:
(Glider)
NOTES
A D^ 6 -
~^
ITERATION
TANK:
(SB19)
AFT
TANK:
(Glider)
NOTES
•4
)
Rutgers Bfank Batiasl Sheet (Dave Edit v 2.0).xls
C-11
Ballast Iterations
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Glider Ballasting\ruQ7\2011_09_28 ru07 NJDEP.xls
MASS fg)
COMMENTS
Deployment
Glider
Date
Preparer
Air Temperature
20
te.
ut
Q
J
o
0
1
£
E
UI
I
m
Es
11
UI £
> O
* 0
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum ,cowiing,aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (njyafer)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
|WR
3E5X
6H86
EOI
gj
yiiai
~7R7^r
3**)*
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
C-13
-------
GLIDER
PREPARER
PREP DATE
LOCATION
f^l: \/
tX^A
|0 3 u
M^O^
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK
Check pump threaded rod (grease)
Check pitch battery threaded rod (grease)
Leak detect in place, batteries secure, white guides free,
no metal shavings, bottles installed, grounded?
IPAYLOADCHECKj
Science Bay Instrument Serial Numbers
2
3
4
5
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD joint, no leak at pucks
Grounded?
Science Bay Weight Configuration
AFT CHECK
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #)
1
Flash card old files removed?
Inspect strain on connectors (damaged connectors as well),
Persistor power supply cable secure, battery secured,
ballast bottle in place, aft cap clear of leak, grounded?
Battery check (using load?)
1. Attach aft battery pack, verify voltage at J13
2, Disconnect aft battery
3. Screw in aft connector
4. Connect pitch battery, verify voltage at J13
5. Disconnect pitch battery
6. Screw in fore connector, verify voltage at J13
7. Attach pitch battery
8. Attach aft battery
9. Verify voltage at J31 (simple probe)
ill
POST-SEAL
GENERAL
Pick Point Present?
Special Instruments Present?
HARDWARE
Nose Cone and pump bladder inspection
C-14
-------
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirping
Corrosion Prevention & Anode Check
Anode Style/Weight
Glider Parts Grounded (stickers)
Ejection weight assembly OK and unselzed?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear)
Aft sensor
Payload sensor
POWERED
Verify Argos ping
Wiggle for 5 minutes —• '
Record m_battery once stabilized \^.
Recordm vacuum @ temperature @ ballast fc
OUTSIDE
Record compass reading 1 \1 ^ & Lf>^ ' 7 4.(*
GPS check? (40 28.75, 74 26.25) ^- J
Indium connect ^•"" ^^^
zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
SOFTWARE
GENERAL |
Version /,
Date ok, delete old logs
Re-burn latest software Image
mdblist.dat, mi, ma, science!
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
if ver < 7.0 configure sbdlistdat
\MAFILES
gotoMO.ma (set x_last_...)
| AUTOEXEOMI
Phone Number
Main is RUDIC, alt is TWR _
u_iridium_failover_retries = 10
c_ctd41 cp_n um_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
In Gliderdos, reset glider to test settings
get f_max_working_depth (102 m)
f_ballast_jaurnped_deadz_width = 30?
CACHE MANAGEMENT (DONE ON DOCKSERVER!)
(this step is very important!)
del ..\state\cache\*.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send,.\state\cache\*.cac
send *.mbd *sbd *.tbd
* Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the software
image locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass freewave transfer of the
files. Save these files or prepare the to-glider with these f
C-15
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
C-16
-------
RjJTG
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Aanderaa Qptode Check IN/OUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coeffcient Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN:
1504 on ru28/ru07
IN / OUT IN/OUT
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 9/6/2011
Previous:
PERFORMED BY: Chip H aide man
Rachel Plunkett
Current:
COCoef
CICoef
C2Coef
C3Coef
CACoef
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E-KX) -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E400 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
C3Coef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
-4141.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution: 15.0 g
PasPort Device
24.5
1011.06
Sample A
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
NaiS03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
WInkler Label
Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 71.19
0.07
24.5
0.2 Cone
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (uM)
0.08 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 0.2
(0,0,0)(<2uM)
0.018
(worst case @ 2 piM)
DELTAS:
0 Cone A
0 Temp A
Concentration (UJM)
(Tftrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
0.062 % A
24.5 Temp avg
Solution: 0 Na2S03
PasPort Device Cross reference
10.22 Temperature
1012.41 Air Pressure (hPa)
Sample B Winkler Label
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 34.2 Dphase
94.61 % Saturation
9.83 Temperature
334.55 Cone (calculated) (uM)
95.46 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 326.56 Concentration
(10.4, 10.4, 10.4) (Titrations) (ppm)
94.3 % Saturation
DELTAS:
7.99 Cone A 1.16 %A
0.39 Temp A 10.025 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Check
96.3
SATURATION:
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
@TEMP
24.44
@ PRESS
995.15
11/21/2011 3:59 PM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (ml)
1.99
(2.0 ±.1) (EPA Compliance)
Paste confia report alt from ootode
Protect 5014 1504 0
PhaseCoef 5014 1504 -3.33906
TernpCoef 5014 1504 23.7279
FoiINo 5014 1504 5009
COCoef 5014 1504 4537.931
CICoef 5014 1504 -250.953
C2Coef 5014 1504 5.664169
C3Coef 5014 1504 -0.05994
C4Coef 5014 1504 0.000244
Salinity 5014 1504 0
CalAirPhasi 5014 1504 32.38397
CalAirTemf 5014 1504 9.906067
CalAirPress 5014 1504 1004.483
CalZeroPhs 5014 1504 66.21377
CalZeroTen 5014 1504 20.49095
Interval 5014 1504
AnCoef 5014 1504
Output 5014 1504
SRIOOeiay 5014 1504
SoftwareVt 5014 1504
SoftwareBt 5014 1504
1.13833 0 0
-0.0306 2.83E-06 -4.2E-09
-162.595 3.29574 -0.02793
8.02322 -0.1584 0.001311
-0.15965 0.003079 -2.5E-05
0.001483 -2.8E-05 2.15E-07
-5.3E-06 1E-07 -7.1E-10
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
C-18
11/21/20113:59 PM
-------
Deployment Checklist
C-19
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
A--
Date
Where
vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on power-up!)
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status, mi
5 get m_battery
Jp JT S6* m_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
reports boot application
«•>*
I S^ {mission completed normally?
(this can be run the night before or at dock)
o
ro
o
In Water
zero_ocean_pressure
run Odctd.mi (with or without float ask RU)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run 100 tn.mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
Perform CTD Comparison CAST \
• ItOT&.&l LON73 51-
[while glider in water
glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
(would say don't need float for ru06, ru07 use it the first deployment) (can skip this if
you want for multiple deployments)
["send *.sbd" is most important
_^-{th1s applies moreso to when handoff ed to indium)
(sequence 100_tn.mi(5)
Jtypically done with RU provided SB19 or Cast Away CTD
-------
Recovery Checklist
C-21
-------
Glider RU07
Date
10/27/2011
Pilots Chip
Laptop Chip
Recovery
Where Off Atlantic City
get Lat/Lon from email or shore
support
obtain freewave comms
obtain lat/lon with where command
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
LAT: 39 20.990 LON: 74 15.115
I* I
[nla
I* I
(note instrument type!)
Castawa
-------
Post-Deployment Checklist
C-23
-------
RUTGERS
Slocum Glider Check-IN
Coastal Ocean DATE:
Observation Lab
GLIDER: g^ol SB:
Power on vehicle in order to fully retract puny, and/or to deflate air bladder,
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure) a 17. G
Nose cone 9*^ ^-U
Remove nose cone T°*£ \~l~(e V\Z-O
Loosen altimeter screws, and remove altimeter or leave temporarily attached
Retract pump
Remove altimeter and hose diaphragm removing all sand, sediment, bio oils
Clean nose cone and altimeter
Tall cone
.X^ Remove tail cone
,-?.: Hose and clean anode and air bladder making sure air bladder is completely clean
Clean cowling
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down
Tall plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean plug if especially dirty
C2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly insert and remove to clean the glider plug
3. Compress air glider female connector
4. Lightly silicon red plug and replace in glider once silicon has been dispersed evenly in
the plugs.
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SB 19 0 Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: 2- B . Pi*-) Temperature: 2 3. 07,(^
Conductivity: ^ • ^4 Conductivity: _
CTD (Maintenance (reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1% Triton X-100 solution
2. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500 - 1000 ppm bleach solution
3. Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
4. Repeat comparison test if results not within T < .01 C, C < .005 S/m
Static Tank Test
SB 19 Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: Temperature:
Conductivity: Conductivity:
C-24
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum GliderAanderaa Optode Check IN/OUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coeffcient Record
OPTODE MODEUSN: 1504 on ru07 NJDEP # 3 IN/OUT IN
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 11/14/2011
Previous:
PERFORMED BY:
Current
David Aragort
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
CSCoef
C4Coef
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
-4141.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution:
10.0 g
PasPort Device
23.08
1002.709684
(unlabeled)
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Results:
OPTODE:
70.9
0.17
21.11
NajSOj
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
WInkler Label
Wlnkler Source
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
0.6 Cone (calculated) (uM)
0.22 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER:
DELTAS:
2
{0,0,0}(<2(iM}
0.57
(worst case @ 2 u,M)
•1.4 Cone A
1.97 Temp A
Concentration (u.M)
(Tltrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
-0.35 %A
22 .095 Temp avg
100% Point
Solution: NA
PasPort Device
9.68
1002.709684
Sample C
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Wlnkler Label
Wlnkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 34.68
91.76
9.68
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
325.91 Cone (calculated) ftiM)
92.7 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 325
{10.4, 10.4, 10.4)
92.44
DELTAS:
0.91 Cone A
0 Temp A
Concentration
(Tltrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
0.26 %A
9,68 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Chedf
SATURATION: 91.15 @ TEMP
20.04
PRESS
1002.371
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
C-25
11/14/20114:25 PM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (ml)
1.99
{2.0 ± .1) (EPA Compliance)
Paste config report all from optode
Protect
PhaseCoef
TempCoef
FoiINo
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
C3Coef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAlrPhas
CalAirTemi
CalAirPres;
CalZeroPh;
CalZeroTer
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIODeiay
Software^
SoftwareBi
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
0
-3.33906
23.7279
5009
4537.931
-250.953
5.664169
-0.05994
0.000244
0
32.38397
9.906067
1004.483
66.21377
20.49095
4
0
1
-1
3
24
1.13833 0 0
-0.0306 2.83E-06 -4.2E-09
-162.595 3.29574 -0.02793
8.02322 -0.1584 0.001311
-0.15965 0.003079 -2.5E-05
0.001483 -2.8E-05 2.15E-07
-5.3E-06 1E-07 -7.1E-10
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
C-26
11/14/2011 4:25 PM
-------
6
Tf -
0,40
-------
'
0-
= 3Y-.C?
<, AAJ0
U A
3 -
rr
0
s-
' r
T
T* TV
'' ^T
0 - 31-H ft
-- %\5
^1 01)
0.4
.DM ~,
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode, Seabird
19 CTD, and YSI Castaway
CTD
C-29
-------
AANOERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
TEST & SPICJFICATIONS
FoiniNo 712. Kel>2006
Layout No: 1308E, 1299G
Circuit Diagram No:
Program Version: 3, Build: 22
Product: Oxygen Optode 5014W
Serial No: 1504
1. Visual and Mechanical Checks:
I.I, O-ring surface
1.2. Soldering quality
1.3. Visual surface
1.4. Pressure test (60MPa)
1.5. Galvanic isolation between housing and electronics
2. Current Drain and Voltages:
2.1. Average current drain at O.SHz sampling (Max: 38mA)
2.2. Current drain in sleep (Max: 300uA)
2.3. DSP voltage, IC5.1 (3.3 ±0.15V)
2.4. Excitation driver voltage, 1C 1.1 (3.3 ±0.15V)
2.5. Flash/RS232 driver voltage, IC7.4 (5 ±0.2V)
3. Receiver test:
3.1. Average of Receiver readings(0±50mV)
3.2. Standard Deviation of Receiver readings (Max: tOmV)
4. Performance Test In Air, 0°C Temperature:
4.1. Amplitude measurement (Blue: 220 - 470mV)
4.2. Phase measurement (Biue: 30 ±5)
4.3. Standard deviation of Phase measurement: (Max: 0.02°)
4.4. Temperature measurement: (700 ±300mV)
5. Performance Test in Air, 20°C Temperature:
5.1. Amplitude measurement (Blue: 290-470mV)
5.2. Phase measurement (Blue: 25 ±5°)
5.3. Standard deviation of Phase measurement: (Max: 0.02°)
5.4. Temperature measurement: (100 ±300mV)
6. Performance Test in Air, 40°C Temperature:
6.1. Amplitude measurement (Blue: 32Q-500mV)
6.2. Phase measurement (Blue: 22 ±5°)
6.3. Standard deviation of Phase measurement: (Max: 0.02°)
6.4. Temperature measurement: (-500 ±300mV)
31mA
250 nA
3.31V
3.30V
5.09V
-6mV
2.56 mV
362.42 mV
34.0°
0.006°
727.31 mV
378.56 mV
28.6°
0.016"
-174.34 mV
365.66 mV
25.9°
0.003°
-510.77 mV
Date: 4 February 2011
Sign:
Vidar Selsvik, Production Engineer
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS AS
58S1 BERGEN, NORWAY Tsl.+47 55 80 48 00 Fax.+47 55 60 48 01 E-mail: info®aaOi.re> Web: tiltp:/A«ww.aa
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
Sensing Foil Batch No: 5009
Certificate No:
Form No. 710. Dec 2005
Product: Oxygen Optode 5014W
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: 29 January 2011
This is to certify that this product has been calibrated using the following instruments:
Parameter: Internal Temperature;
Calibration points and readings
Temperature (CC)
Reading (mV)
Giving these coefficients
Index
TempCoef
0.98 11.90
738.73 392.58
23.85
-3.97
35.87
-376.36
0
2.37279E01
1
-3.0595 1E-02
2
2.83023E-06
3
-4.19785E-09
Parameter: Oxygen:
Range:
Accuracy1*:
Resolution:
Settling Time (63%):
O2 Concentration
0-500 pM l)
Air Saturation
0-120%
< ±8nM or ±5% (whichever is greater) ±5%
< 1 pM < 0.4%
< 25 seconds
Calibration points and readings2':
Air Saturated Water
Phase reading (°) 3.23840E+01
Temperature reading (°C) 9.90607E+00
Air Pressure (hPa) 1.00448E+03
Zero Solution (Na2SO3)
6.62138E+01
2.04910E+OI
Giving these coefficients
Index
PhaseCoef
0 1 2
-3.33906EOO 1.13833EOO O.OOOOOEOO
O.OOOOOEOO
!> Valid for 0 to 2000m (6562ft) depth, salinity 33 - 37ppt
2) The calibration is performed in fresh water and the salinity setting is set to: 0
Date: 31 January 2011
Sign:
Tor-Ove Kvalvaag, Calibration Engineer
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS AS
W51 BERSeN, NORWAY Tol +47 55 60 46 GO Fax, *47 55 80 48 01 E-mail: info@aadi.no Web: http:tfwww.aadi.no
C-31
-------
1ST! CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
AANDERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS
Certificate No: 3653_5009_40331
Batch No: 5009
Product: O2 Sensing Foil PSt3 3853
Calibration Date: 2 June 2010
Form No 62I.Dec 2005
Calibration points and phase readings (degrees)
Temperature (°C)
Pressure (hPa)
O2in%
ofO2+N2
C)
0.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
20.90
30.00
3.97
977.00
73.18
68.01
64.39
55.80
46.27
35.09
29.85
10.93
977.00
72.63
67.02
63.16
54.16
44.47
33.38
28.30
20.15
977.00
71.62
65.42
61.20
51.76
41.97
31.14
26.31
29.32
977.00
70.72
63.92
59.44
49.56
39.75
29.24
24.64
38.39
977.00
69.77
62.31
57 SI
47.45
37.69
27.56
23.19
Giving these coefficients I}
Index
CO Coefficient
Cl Coefficient
C2 Coefficient
C3 Coefficient
C4 Coefficient
0
4.53793E+03
-2.50953E+02
5.664 17E+00
-5.99449E-02
2.436 14E-04
1
-1.62595E+02
8.02322E+00
-1.59647E-01
1.48326E-03
-5.26759E-06
2
3.29574E+00
-1.58398E-01
3.07910E-03
-2.82110E-05
1.00064E-07
3
-2.79285E-02
1.31141E-03
-2.46265E-05
2.15156E-07
-7.14320E-10
" Ask for Form No 621S when this O2 Sensing Foil is used in Oxygen Sensor 3830 with Serial Numbers lower than
184.
Date: 2/24/2011
Sign:
Tor-Ove Kvalvaag, Calibration Engineer
AANOERAA DATA INSTRUMENTS AS
5851 BERGEN, NORWAY Tol. +47 55 60 48 00 Fax. +47 55 SO 48 01 E-mail: inlo@aadi.no Web: http://www.aadi.no
C-32
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Beltevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seablrd.com
Serv/ce |
j?Annrf 1
PM A Mil mhor 1
63738 1
Customer Information:
Company WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION Date 4/28/2011
i
Contact H [Peter Collins
PO Number TWR4570
Serial Number WEBB Giider-0055
Model Number I WEBB Glider
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2. Perform Routine Calibration Service.
Problems Found:
1. The conductivity cell was found to require cleaning and re-platinization,
2. Antifoulant devices were found to be dirty.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of trie temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Cleaned and replatinized the conductivity cell.
4. Performed "Final" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
5. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
6. Installed NEW AF24173 Aoti-fouiant cylinders).
7. Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, April 28, 2011 Page 1 of 1
C-33
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Bel lev ue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer:
HWEBB RESEARCH
CORPORATION
Job Number:
Model Number
|| 63738 |
U WEBB Glider |
(Date of Report:
(Serial Number: |
4/21/2011
| WEBB Glider-0055
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift.
If the calibration identifies a problem, then a second calibration is performed after work is completed. The 'as received'
calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients using the program SEACON. The coefficient'offset'
allows a small correction for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients
obtained after a repair apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Performed G Not Performed
Date: 4/12/2011
Drift since last cal: | +0.00012 [ Degrees Celsius/year
Comments:
'FINAL CALIBRATION'
Performed Not Performed
Date: | 4/21/2011]
Comments:
Drift since 16 Sep 06 | +0.00049 Degrees Celsius/year
C-34
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 21-Apr-l I
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = 3.207743e-005
al = 2,722827e-004
a2 = -2.066693e-006
a3 = 1.4990356-007
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
14.9999
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
611669.0
523780.4
335258.3
290693.0
233673.5
192748.1
168994.5
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
INST TEMP
(ITS-90)
0.9999
4.5001
15.0000
18.4997
24.0001
29.0002
32.4999
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
-0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
-0.0003
0.0001
0.0002
-0.0001
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al [/n(n)] + a2[/w2(n)] + a3[/n\n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
a o.oo
-0.01
-0.02
_L
I I I I
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature, Degrees C
30
35
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
16-Sep-06 -2.25
21-Apr-11 -0.00
C-35
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Apr-11
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = -3.406049e-005
al = 2.87692Se-004
a2 = -3.261384e-006
a3 = 1.807112e-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
611741.0
523843.0
335277.2
290706.5
233684.1
192758.5
169003.2
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4999
15.0002
18.4999
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al O(n)] + a2[/n2(n)] + a3[/n3(n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
o
a o.oo
-0.01
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0002
-0.0001
-0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
-0.02
1 1 1 1
*• at
»— — •
i i i i
•
i i
. <
IMI
i= 1^
I I I I
~ 4-
i i i i
5 0 5 10 15 20 2
Temperature, Degrees C
C-36
•-
i i i i
i i i i
• 16-Sep-06 -0.53
A 12-Apr-11 0.00
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer: ]|WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
|Job Number; |[ 63738 | [Date of Report: || 4/21/2011
[Model Number [[ WEBB Glider [Serial Number: || WEBB Glider-0055
Conductivity sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration is
performed after work is completed. The 'as received' calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients using the program SEACON. The
coefficient 'slope' allows small corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration
coefficients obtained after a repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' S Performed ] Not Performed
Date: [4/12/2011 ] Drift since last cal: | -0-00030 [ PSU/month*
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER CLEANING & REPLATINIZING' 0 Performed Not Performed
Date: [4/21/2011 | Drift since 16 Sep 06 | +0.00010 [ PSU/month*
Comments:
* Measured at 3,0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatiniung tend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift in
post-cleaning-calibration indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit
C-37
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Apr-ll
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.922178e-001
h = 1.277352e-001
i = -1.7680506-004
j = 2.9379736-005
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.29J4 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = -1.2360e-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
15,0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5001
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.6460
34.6257
34.5827
34.5732
34.5624
34.5545
34.5481
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96279
3.26851
4.24598
4.58959
5.14502
5.66424
6.03450
INST FREO
(Hz)
2790.34
5566.06
5776.57
6402.67
6608.42
6927.81
7213.28
7409.92
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96280
3.26850
4.24597
4.58957
5.14503
5.66427
6.03448
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00001
-0.00001
-0.00001
-0.00001
0.00001
0.00003
-0.00002
f = 1NST FREQ * sqrt(1.0 + WBOTC * t) / 1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if + jf4) / (1 + 5t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure[decibars]; 5 = CTcor; E = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.004
0.002
CD 0.000
-0.002
-0.004
1 J II
^
iiii
^
-*-"
iiii
i i
^
*i.
. . L_
1
k
•
) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
C-38
_LJ_
| • | 16-Sep-06 0.9995235
FT! 12-Apr-11 1.0000000
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 21-Apr-11
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.9021560-001
h = 1.2723030-001
i = -6.6333330-005
j = 2.1546320-005
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = -1.2360e-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
14.9999
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.6758
34.6552
34.6115
34.6016
34.5899
34.5806
34.5732
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96510
3.27102
4.24913
4.59295
5.14866
5.66804
6.03837
INST FREO
(Hz)
2790.35
5569.15
5779.81
6406.34
6612.23
6931.84
7217.47
7414.26
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.96509
3.27102
4.24914
4.59294
5. 14866
5.66804
6.03838
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00000
0.00000
0.00001
-0.00001
0.00000
-0.00001
0.00000
f = INST FREQ * sqrtfl.O + WBOTC * t) / 1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf") / (I + St + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressurefdecibais]; 8 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residua! = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.002-r
0.001
W
To" 0.000-
D
-0.001
-0,002-
t
r^
1 1 1 *
^
\,
If
:4 -
"*— -_
*.
^*~~+~~~~.
1 1 I I
A L
^
1 t 1 1
>
i
3123456
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
C-39
» | 16-Sep-06 1.0002245
"Sl21-Apr-11 1.0000000
CALIBRATION AFTER
CLEANING AND
REPLATiNIZING CELL
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, Washington, 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (425) 643 - 9866 Fax (425) 643 - 9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0055
CALIBRATION DATE: 11-Apr-J 1
COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = -4.923020e-002
PA1 = 2.347635e-002
PA2 = 2.022392e-009
PTHAO = -7.057100e+001
PTHA1 = 5,142905e-002
PTHA2 = -2.0773286-007
WEBB GLIDER PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
508 psiaS/N 8731
PTCAO =
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 =
PTCBO =
PTCB1 =
PTCB2 =
PRESSURE
PRESSURE
PSIA
14
104
204
304
404
504
404
304
204
104
14
.72
.97
.96
.98
.97
.98
.95
.94
.96
.97
.72
SPAN CALIBRATION
INST THERMISTOR
OUTPUT
13.
3853.
8108.
12359.
16608.
20852.
16609.
12361.
8109.
3854.
13.
8
3
1
5
7
8
4
3
3
7
6
OUTPUT
1824.
1824.
1824.
1926.
1823.
1826.
1824.
1822.
1822.
1824.
1825.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14
104
204
304
404
504
404
304
204
104
14
.74
.92
.94
.97
.97
.95
.99
.98
.96
.96
.73
ERROR
%FSR
0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
0
0
0
-0
0
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.01
.00
.00
.00
-6.1386146+002
-3.6871586-003
-3.9648186-003
2.495538e+001
-1.250000e-004
O.OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
y = thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPA1 * y + PTEMPA2 * y
x = pressure output - PTCAO - PTCA1 * t - PTCA2 * l
n = x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB1 * t + PTCB2 * t2)
pressure (psia) = PAO + PA1 * n + PA2 * n2
0.50
0.25
3 o.oo
to
-0.25
-0.50
i i i i
i i i i
TEMP
ITS90
32.50
29.00
24.00
18.50
15.00
4.50
1.00
PRESS
TEMP
2020.60
1951.90
1852.20
1743.40
1676.30
1468.30
1399.50
INST
OUTPUT
26.99
27.80
28.83
29.53
30.62
31.16
31.19
TEMPCT.TS901
-5.00
35.00
SPAN(mV)
24.96
24.95
i i i i
i i i i
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
~" 11-Apr-11 -0.00
50
100
150 200
250 300 350
Pressure (PSiA)
C-40
400 450 500 550
-------
SonTek
YS I incorporated
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101493
1.0
4/26/2011
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: Jennifer Patterson
Date: 11/22/2011
C-41
-------
SonTek
YS I incorporated
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101494
1.0
4/26/2011
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: Jennifer Patterson
Date: 11/22/2011
C-42
-------
Appendix D
Deployment 3
6/7/2012 - 6/19/2012
D-1
-------
Title Page Blank
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
-x
COASTAL OCEAN
OBSERVATION
LAB
OPERATIONS
GLIDER
RU07
MISSION EPA-DEP3
DATE
6/7/2012
GLIDER DENSITY (in target water)
1021.70
lkg/mA3
LOCATION
Coastal NJ
kg/mA3
RU COOL GLIDER BALLAST RECORD
Copy of 2012_06_06 ru07 NJDEP.xls
D-2
-------
C:\Documents and Settings\haldeman\Desktop\Copy of 2012_06_06 ru07 NJDEP.xls
MASS fg)
COMMENTS
Deployment
M |DFP
Glider
RU07
Date
R 'tO 12
Preparer
Tina
Air Temperature
20
DC
111
o
Q
|
5
ui
<
£
£3
gS
w t
sg
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum.cowling.aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
no wL bar 6250.9, with wt. bar 7172.9
port 275.8 star 276.9
on payload
no pickpoint
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1.0220
19.08
-6.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0220
1100
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
50976.357
0.0000
induced)
-3
-29
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H -distance
0
107
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
#DIV/OI
Should Hang (in tank) (g)
Adjust by: (g)
-27.62
-21.62
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -23.46
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) 52068.38
Ballasting Alternative (known
VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m*)
Glider Density 3 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
5.871
0.0
0.0
volume 1:
volume 2:
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
50976.36
50976.36
^afla
40.4 mL
-------
C:\Documents and SettingsUialdeman\Desktop\Copy of 2012_06_06 ru07 NJDEP.xls
j Gilder Density 4 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*) | 1022.42]G1 Volume
50.9 L
Full Retract Scale Weight
Full Extend Scale Weight
Original Volume
Pump Size
Pump Size (retracted)
Pump Size (extended)
Ballast Pump Size
Glider Reported pump_volume Resultant Volume {in air/tank)
432
50976.357
0
50976.357
50976.357
% Matched
#DMO!
#D1V/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0
-422.68818
Max Density Range
0.00
0.00
0.00
+- sigma
Max Density (in target)
Min Density (in target)
*DISCLAIMER = make sure all values are correct, and accurate,
dependencies are exact dunk weights, tank density and
temperature, as well as units
Ballast Sheet (Dunk 5)
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
-------
GLIDER p (J
PREPARER £U,f,
PREP DATE rf ^
£2 £
s ™
£W S/,WW< if
\si-t~2_&lj^ ty
LOCATION ///£*« 4 /-
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK
B 1) £77? £fc>J^
^ 3)0*/w^ ;r0w
"J A^
w *»J
Check pump & pitch threaded rod Leak detect in place, batteries
(grease & clean if necessary) •^ secure, white guides free, no .
Grounded Nose? ix"*"* metal shavings, bottles installed \s
PAYLOAD CHECK
Special Sensors / Additional Sensors CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD
1) — joint, no leak at pucks
2)
Grounded Parts:
—
Fore Sci Ring »/, CTD >t/o
Aft Sci Ring J Other?
Science Bay Weight Configuration ft«^ - ~) *~4 <, &* /*»
ketilf
>M/- bofr#*\
AFT CHECK
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #) (if not standard) -
Flash Card: old data removed?
Inspect strain on connectors Battery check
(worn connectors), battery Aft Pack - J13 Voltage
secured, ballast bottle present, aft ., Pitch Pack - J13 Voltage
cap clean/clear of leak S „ Nose Packs - J13 Voltage
Aft cap grounded?
Att Emer - J31 Voltage / f t ?I""lHO
Payload sensor -X"
unseized?
j POWERED |
Verify Argos ping
^ Stabilized m_battery
\ b« Z-o
Wiggle for 5 minutes
| OUTSIDE |
Compass Check
1)
2) / '
3)
4)
(reading (£
* i
i \
j3i
r\ >
~*/^ m_vacuum @ T @ ballast fer^f- t^Z-'i-^fc-l'
g compass)
I /
1 J
GPS check
(lat) -^-^"
Iridium connect
(Ion) 2
^--^Alt
zero_ocean_pressure, get m jaressure
_ ^
,~-~-
logging on; rotate slowly 360,
logging off, plot data: 360 test
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
D-6
-------
SOFTWARE
GENERAL I
Version 1 fl£, Re-bum latest software image
Date OK? J^~ configure TBDIist
delete old logs ./ NBDIist
\CONFIG 1
simul.sim deleted
\MAFILES
gotpllO.ma (set x_last_...)
AUTOEXEC.MI
Irid Main: 88160000592 S c_ctd41 cp_num_fields_to_send 4 _
Irid Alt: 15085482446 J, Calibration coefficients
u_iridium_failover_retries = 10 y f_ballast_pumped_deadz_width = 30?]
Reset the glider, observe any errors get f_max_working_depth (102 m)
I CACHE MANAGEMENT!
del ..\state\cacheV.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ..\state\cache\*.cac
send *.mbd *.sbd *.tbd ^
* Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the
software image locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass
freewave transfer of the files. Save these files or prepare the to-glider with these files
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN |
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_all_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
OPTODE
Check in completed?
-------
0
/
HL
/TO
-27Z-
4-;
-I
1
i-Z.
D-8
-------
em/12
Ballast iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION^
(J
BALLAST
FORE1
PORE 2
AFT
NOTES
TANK:
(SB 19)
TANK;
(Glider) C^
j
ITERATION
5
BALLAST
FORE1
FORE 2
NOTES
TANK:
(SB19)
•J
y
7
1
A1
)
TANK:
(Glider)
ITERATION ^°
NOTES
TANK:
(SB19)
TANK;
(Glider)
RU07_2012 5 31.XJS
D-9
Ballast Iteratons
-------
5
If
D-10
-------
Macintosh HD: Users: haskins: Desktop: RU07_2012_5_31 .xls
MASS fg)
COMMENTS
Deployment
N JDFP
Glider
pun?
Date
c on HO
J.OU. If,
Preparer
Tina
Air Temperature
o 20
J-
jjg
0£
111
Q
Q
g
_
m
1
IB
£ffi
11
ui b
*s
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum.cowling.sft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
8195
4257
6500.2
4638.4
1151.2
16.8
7172.9
552.7
0
0
7613.8
9329.8
727.85
727.85
265.4
246.4
241.3
r\cx/j \r\ a44-
no wt. bar 6250.9, with wt. bar 7172.9
port 275.8 star 276.9
on payload
no pickpoint
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1.0221
Tank Temperature (C) 18.43
Weight in Tank (g) -8.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1 .0223
Target Temperatu re © 11 .00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL) 50644.15
Total Mass (g) 51636.6
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) _ 1.0196
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) -6
Volume Change (target) (mL) -26
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation 0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull 107
H-distance #DIV/OI
JdeflJ.
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (in tank) (g)
Adjust by: (g)
-14.15
-6.15
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g)
Adjust Glider Mass [entered volume) (g)
-6.18
107.46
* Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (In target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m*)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
50532.991
1022.4
1020.1
volume 1:
volume 2:
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
50886.221
50513.226
50532.991
50644.146
107 g
40.4 mL
-------
Macintosh HD: Users: haskins: Desktop: RU07_2012_5_31 .xls
MASS (g)
COMMENTS
Deployment
NJDEP
Glider
RU07
Date
5.30.12
Preparer
Tina
Air Temperature
p 20
->.
o
f
i
2
li
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1 .0221
Tank Temperature (C) 18.43
Weight in Tank (g) i 34.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) I 1.0223
Target Temperature © I 11.00
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card) fa^CO - 2.
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vactium,cowting,aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
8195
4257
6488
4638.4
1151.2
16.8
7172.9
552.7
0
0
7613.8
9329.8
727.85
727.85
345.4
223.4
218.3
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL) 50699.72
Total Mass (g) 51658.4
Glider Density 1 (air^(g/mL) ^ 1.0189
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) -6
Volume Change (target) (mL) -26
/U~ ?,Vic ?£."> v$ /?.)o\4
no wt. bar 6250.9, with wL bar 7172.9
port 275.8 star 276.9
on payload
no pickpoint
UL.
' \ \
: w - 37/,v 3//.0 jg 2^31
+ 73 2*iiri\
t*3 .Wl 3 \
~ •*
H MOMENT (rad) (deg)
Angle of Rotation (before) 0.0
Angle of Rotation (after) 0.0
Angle of Rotation 0 0.0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull 107
HHdisJtance HJy/OI
Should Hang (in tank) (gj
Adjust by: (g)
-14.16
-48.16
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g)
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g)
-48.21
142.43
' Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (In target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m*)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
50513.226
1023.2
1019.4
volume 1:
volume 2:
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
50886.221
50513.226
50699.724
107g3»
40.4 mL
-------
5/31/12
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION 1
NOTES
q
or\
ITERATION
NOTES
ITERATION
NOTES
TANK:
(SB19)
TANK:
(Glider)
RU07_2012_5_31.xls
D-13
Ballast Iterations
-------
Macintosh HD: Users: haskins: Desktop: RU07_2012_5_31 .xls
MASS fq)
COMMENTS
Deployment
NJDEP
Glider
RU07
Date
5 30 12
Preparer
Tina
Air Temperature
7 20
».
«
107,1.2.5 e i\°o
BE
Ul
O
3
5
i
n
S
<
o
£ffi
a|
Be
s§
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum .cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY (no rails!)
WINGS
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
8195
4257
6488
4638.4
1151.2
16.8
7172.9
552.7
0
0
7613.8
9329.8
727.85
727.85
345.4
223.4
218.3
nowt. bar 6250.9, with wt. bar 71 72.9
port 275.8 star 276.9
on payload
no pickpoint
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1 .0221
Tank Temperature (C) 18.43
Weight in Tank (g) -1672.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0223
Target Temperature © 11 .00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL) 50900
Total Mass (g) 51658.4
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) j 1.0149
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) -6
Volume Change (target) (mL) -26
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angfe of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation 0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull 107
H-distance #DIV/OI
(dc«J
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (in tank) fg>
Adjust by: (a)
-14.22
1657.78
Adjust Gilder Mas* (Dunk Volume} (g)
Adjust Gilder Mass (entered volume) (g)
1658.10
347.06
volume 1:50886.221
volume 2:
Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / ms)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
52182.506
990.5
101 S.4
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
#DIV/0!
40.4 mL
-------
Macintosh HD: Users: haskins: Desktop: RU07_2012_5_31 .xls
MASS (q)
COMMENTS
Deployment
M IDFP
Glider
RLJ07
n«*4iM
uate
5 "30 1 2
Preparer
Tin^
Air Temperature
20
tO7 7 . 7-S G- u C-
tc.
ill
Q
O
|
g
1
<
m
£ffi
H! X
58
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, cart)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuijm,cow!ing,aft battery)
DA VI fkAn PAV Inn railel\
rM I LUAU t3AT ^flu railS!)
WINGS ^1
WING RAILS (screws)
PICK POINT
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1 (starboard)
FORE BATTERY 2 (port)
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
8195
4257
6488
4638.4
1151.2
16.8
nf-y.- .j-
"'•1 ''
.^-53ZT
«E:O
0
7613.8
9329.8
727.85
727.85
•9M-
Sm\J\S
•&A,
&&~
»Aa^
(pt-'>D^\ tO^vV\ v^,\"MV\VV»jp
^^ J
feStfl / . Pwing rails on payload 1 \ ~l "2- » *\.
piiS-b s -iiW-1 7
on payload
no pickpoint ^A0^
v"0"
*e5Sl \ i V
3^"
/
3HS 4 v/7
7.^3. 4 ^ ;
..i\..6.. 3 \/
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) T 1.0221
Tank Temperature (C) 1 8.43
Weight in Tank (g) x -1672.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1 .0223
Target Temperature © 11 .00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (ml) 50900
Total Mass (g) 50333.6
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) ___ 0.9889
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) -6
Vol u m e C h ange (target) (m L) -26
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation 0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull 107
H-distance #DIV/0!
JML ..
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (tn tank) (g)
Adjust by: (g)
-14.22
1657,78
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume} (g)
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g)
1657.78
1671.86
volume 1: 50886.221
volume 2:
Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m*)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
50886.221
989.7
989.4
average =
PICK POINT MASSES
PICK POINT VOLUME
#DIV/0!
40.4 mL
-------
Macintosh HD:AII My Stuff:RUCOOLFormsiGlider Ballasting Template.xls
MASS fg)
COMMENTS
Deployment
N IDEP
Glider
RU07
Date
5.21.12
Preparer
Tina/Ai i8 ^
II*) I 2
/Ci A
bcioa 5
552.^
•^-7-fi n
icbfS .£>
^ 30=1 6
[4^5.1
^85 o
^.xj | C\
I A J />.
(p^8^ O ^o^todLjL
pick point? Fish finder?
rc^)i
1 zi • 2>S
Tank Specifics Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) iGlider Volume (mL) 50800
Tank Temperature (C) Total Mass (g) 0
Weight in Tank (g) iGlider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) 0.0000
Target Specifics Volume Change (temperature induced)
Target Density {g/mL) jVolume Change (tank) (mL) -71
Target Temperature © JVolume Change (target) (mL) 0
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A
H. WOMENTJrad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0
_
290
107
Hjjiy/oj
Jdeg).
0.0
0.0
0.0
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hullj
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 0.00
Adjust by:
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
D-17
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Aanderaa Qptode Check IN/OUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coeffcient Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN:
1504
IN / OUT
IN
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 3/23/2012
Previous:
PERFORMED BY: Amanda, Austin, David
Current:
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
C2Coef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
C2Coef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
C3Coef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
0.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution: 10.2 g / 900 ml Na2SO3
Spark Unuit 4 T Probe Cross reference
22.22 Temperature
997.968 Air Pressure (hPa)
Sample Bottle C Wlnkler Label
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 71.32 Dphase
0.12 % Saturation
21.4 Temperature
0.32 Cone (calculated) (uM)
0. 12 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 0 Concentration (uM)
(0, 0, 0) (0 - 2 uM) (Tftrations) (ppm)
0 % Saturation
{worst case @ 2 uM = .04 % or 0% )
DELTAS:
0.32 Cone A 0.12 %A
0.82 Temp A 21.81 Temp avg
100% Point
Solution: NA NajSOj
Spark Unit 4 T probe Cross reference
9.93 Temperature
997.968 Air Pressure (hPa)
Sample A, Sample B Winkler Label
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod Wlnkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 33.5 Dphase
97.04 % Saturation
9.76 Temperature
350.64 Cone (calculated) (uM)
100.73 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 343.75 Concentration
(11,10.8,11.2) (Titrations) (ppm)
98.75 % Saturation
DELTAS:
6.89 Cone A 1.98 %A
0.17 Temp A 9.845 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Check
SATURATION: 98.42
@TEMP
25.42
@ PRESS
997.968
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
D-18
6/7/2012 1:49 PM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (ml)
(2.0 ± .1} (EPA Compliance)
Paste confia report all from opt ode
Protect
PhaseCoef
TempCoef
FoiINo
COCoef
ClCoef
C2Coef
CSCoef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAirPhast
CalAirTemf
CalAirPress
CalZeroPhc
CalZeroTen
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIOOelay
SoftwareV*
SoftwareBi
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
0
-6.62372 1.204068
23.7279 -0,0306
5009
4537.931 -162.595
-250.953 8.02322
5.664169 -0.15965
-0.05994 0.001483
0.000244 -5.3E-06
30
32.99431
10.29875
1026.47
65.21005
24.86774
2
0 1
101
-1
3
24
0 0
2.83E-06 -4.2E-09
3.29574 -0.02793
-0.1584 0.001311
0.003079 -2.5E-05
-2.8E-05 2.15E-07
1E-07 -7.1E-10
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
D-19
6/7/2012 1:49 PM
-------
Deployment Checklist
D-20
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
Date
Where
0
vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerupl)
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
get mjjattery
get m_vaeuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
•I
reports boot application
mission completed normally?
In Water
run status, mi
zero_ocean_pressure
run Od.mi {with or without float ask RU) if [glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdeptfi, if not call
Z**^ |wh
while glider in water
send *.dbd *.m!g *.sbd
run shallow, mi
V^-**""^ ["send *.sbd" is most important
(this applies moreso to when handed off to indium)
{{glider should dive and not reappear) (report to Rutgers or steam out slowly once it dp
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
typically done with RU provided S8E19 or Cast Away CTD
LAT:
LON
-------
Recovery Checklist
D-22
-------
Glider Ru07
Pilots
Recovery
Date
Where
get Lat/Lon from email or shore | \J
support -V\' 07.
obtain freewave comms j
obtain lat/lon with where command
LAT:
(note instrument type!)
Perform CTD Comparison CAST \/ \
D-23
-------
Post-Deployment Checklist
D-24
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Check-IN
DATE: "te°M*
GLIDER:
SB:
Vehicle Powered
Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone
2, Loosen altimeter screws, and
remove altimeter or leave
temporarily attached
3. Retract pump
4. Remove altimeter and hose
diaphragm removing all sand,
sediment, bio oils
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter
Tall cone
1. Remove tail cone
2, Hose and clean anode and air
bladder making sure air bladder is
completely clean
3. Clean cowling
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down
Tall plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean
plug if especially dirty
2, Re-dip red plug and repeatedly
insert and remove to clean the
glider plug
3. Compress air glider female
connector
4. Lightly silicon red plug and
replace in glider once silicon has
been dispersed evenly in the plugs
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SB19 „ Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: \°1 -5& C- Temperature: \<\ • T& CC~
Conductivity: M .
Conductivity:
q
SB!9
Temperature:
Conductivity:
CTD Maintenance {reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1 % Triton X-100 solution
2. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500 - 1000 ppm bleach solution
3, Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
4. Repeat comparison test if above results not within T < .01 C, C < ,005 S/m
Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: ___
Conductivity:
Vehicle Disassembled
1, Check leak points for water or salt buildup
2. BACKUP FLASH CARDS in /coolgroup/glider_OS_backups//,
DO NOT DELETE DATA OFF CARDS
3. Give cards to John Kerfoot (if available)
4. Remove used batteries and place in return crate
5. Re-assemble glider with a vacuum
D-25
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode, Seabird
41CP CTD, and YSI
Castaway CTD
D-26
-------
a xylem brand
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622, Dec 2005
Sensing Foil Batch No:
Certificate No:
5009
5014W 15041129
Product: 5014
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23,2012
TCS is to notify that this product has been calibrated aatag the Mowing inaramento:
Fluke CHUB E-4
Fluke 5615 PRT
Fluke 5615 FRT
Honeywell PPT
Calibration Bath model FNT 321 -I -40
Serial No. A7C6T7
Serial No. 849155
Serial No. 802054
Serial No. 44074
1
Parameter: Tn*fflrntf TMIMMI™
CaUbradon pcton and reading*!
TerapemeueCC)
Reading (mV)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Girtqg OHM cocflkdcnte
Index
TMjjONf
*Nf*p T*J in mun im raHhnrim Ml
•*-— n*sta~v f\~m
0
2.37279E+01
1
-3.05951E-02
2
2.83023E-06
3
-4.19785B-09
3T performed
Range:
Aeokot^:
RewJuHoo;
SaeKBillne^*):
OZOmoanlndoB
0-500 ^M"
< ±8jiM or ±5%(whSchever is greater)
-------
a xylem brand
Sensing F«U Batch No: 5009
Certificate No: 3853 5009 40217
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 621, Dec 2005
Product: 02 Sensing Fail PSt3 3853
CaHbrafloa Date: 8 February 2010
CaUbntfOB potato taAftmtt todtegg (degrees)
TbotgentmefQ
PreiBUW (hPi)
Q2!n%Qf02-t-N2
0.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
iaoo
20.90
30.00
3.97
977.06
73.18
68.01
64.39
55.80
46,27
33.09
55!B
1Q.93
977.05
72.63
67.02
SITS
J4.1J
44.47
33.38
28.30
20.13
977,00
71.62
65.42
61.20
51.76
41.97
31.14
28.30
2932
977.00
70.72
S3Z
59.44
49 .56
i9.?4
29.24
24.64
3839
97V.OU
69.77
62.31
57 JSJ
47A5
yjjfs
2736
23.19
Giving these coefficients
bte
OOOuffidm
Cl OoBfBdent
CSOaeffidatt
OOodlldent
04OgetBdm
ff
4.53793&4O3
-2J0953E+02
5.66417E400
-3.99449&O2
2.43CI4E-04
I
-J.62595&ta2
8.02322&riX}
-IJ9647E-01
I^8326&O3
-5.26759B-06
2
3.29574E4OO
-U8398E-01
3.07910^-03
-2.82110E-05
1.00064E-07
3
-Z79285E-6S
1.31141B-03
•2.46263E-05
2.15I56E-07
-7.14320E-10
li
Att far Form No 62IS when this 02 Sensing Foil it tued in Oxygen Sensor 3630 with Serial Numbers tower than 184.
Due:
Febnjarj-8,2010
Date faatumaiu. fee.
Atfebonj, MA 02703 Td. +1 (508) 226-9300 onai fa&USA@xyfcminc cam
D-28
-------
CALIBRATION CiRTIPICATE
a xylem brand
Searing Foil Batch NK 5009
Certificate No: 5014W 1504 1129
Fonn No. 622. Dee 2005
Protect: 5014
SertaINo: 1S04
CtJibnrtianDate: March 23, 2012
Bate from Cod Down Test:
Cool Down Test
Sample No.
2,166
-sn!504
SR10 Soling Coefficients:
At the SR10 output the Oxygen Optode 3830 can give either absolute oxygen concentration in ^M or air saturation in
%. The setting of the internal property "Output" J>, controls the selection of the unit The coefficients for converting
SR10 raw data to engineering units are fixed.
Output »-l
A-0
B-4.883E-01
C=0
D = 0
Oxygen (uM) » A + BN •»• Q^2 + DN3
Output =-2
A-0
B=1,465B-01
C=0
D = 0
Oxygen (%) = A + BN + CN2 + DNS
3> The default outpal setting is set to-I
Dale;
March 23, 2012
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
182 Ea*t Swet, Sate B Atfleboro. MA 02703 Td. -H (508) 226-9300 eaaft taftUSA@xjtantoe.«
D-29
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9868 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Service
J
Report
\
RMA Number j '
66958 |
Customer Information:
Company
WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
Date
1/12/2012
Contact
Beth Rizzo
PO Number frwR5740
Serial Number WEBB Glider-0080
Model Number I WEBB Glid
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation,
2, Perform Routine Calibration Service.
Problems Found:
1, The anti-foulant devices appeared "dirty".
2. Conductivity cell was found to have been cracked.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Replaced the conductivity cell.
4. Performed "Final" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
5. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
6. Installed NEW AF24173 Anti-foulant cylinders).
7, Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Page 2 of 2
D-30
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer; |[WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
|job Number: \\ 66958 | [Date of Report: || 12/28/2011
[Model Number:]| WEBB Glider ' [Serial Number: || WEBB Glider-0080 |
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift. If
the calibration identifies a problem, then a second calibration is performed after work is completed. The 'as received'
calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'offset'allows a small correction for
drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a repair apply only to
subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' & Performed Not Performed
Date: [12/13/2011] Drift since last cal: 0.0000 J Degrees Celsius/year
Comments:
'FINAL CALIBRATION' v Performed Not Performed
Date: [12/28/2011] Drift since 03 Apr 06 [ 0.0000 | Degrees Celsius/year
Comments:
D-31
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer:
Job Number:
IWEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
66958
Model Number:]
WEBB Glider
Date of Report:
Serial Number:
| 12/28/2011
| WEBB Glider-0080
Conductivity sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration is
performed after work is completed. The 'as received' calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'slope' allows small
corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a
repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Date: 12/13/2011
!v| Performed
Drift since last cal:
0.0000
Not Performed
PSU/month*
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER REPAIR1
Date: 12/28/2011
• Performed
Drift since Last Cal:
N/A
Not Performed
I PSU/month*
Comments:
The conductivity cell was replaced.
* Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatinizing tend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift in
post-cleaning-calibration indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit.
D-32
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 28-Dec-ll
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = 7.4616526-005
al = 2.6267786-004
a2 = -1.359031e-006
a3 = 1.315501e-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
618337.9
529382.2
338612.3
293537.2
235867.3
194510.3
170501.8
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0001
4.4998
15.0002
18.5001
23.9996
29.0002
32.5000
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al [ln(n)] + a2[/«2(n)J + a3[/«3(n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02-
0.01
a o.oo
DC
-0.01
-0.02
i i i i
i i i I
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.0001
-0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
-0.0004
0.0002
-0.0000
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
3-Apr-06
28-Dec-11
0.11
0.00
-50 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature, Degrees C
30
35
D-33
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird,com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: !3-Dec-11
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = 1.611751e-005
al = 2.763191e-004
a2 = -2.4194956-006
a3 = 1.5904006-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
618303.2
529347.2
338600.3
293528.2
235875.9
194510.0
170505.0
[NSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
0.9999
4.5000
15.0000
18.4998
24.0001
29.0001
32.4999
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al [/«(n)J + a2[/«2(n)] + a3[//»3(n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
-0.0001
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
-0.0001
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
\j.\j*.
Om
.U I
0
r\ n nn
Residual, (1
3 C
3 C
*• C
-u.u i
n no
i i i i
I I I
I I I I
....
JC *=-
I I I I
.
km
" g=
I I I I
r
-U.Ui
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature, Degrees C
D-34
f
•
I I
[¥! 3-Apr-06 -0.64
m 13-Dec-11 -0.00
POSTCR- iWS.
CALIBRATION
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 28-Dec-l 1
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.716705e-001
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
h = 1.5049386-001
i = -4.1278546-004
CTcor
WBOTC
= 3.2500<
= -2.6171*
j = 5.3506626-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.8719
34.8512
34.8064
34.7960
34.7843
34.7763
34.7690
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.98026
3.28769
4.27053
4.61597
5.17439
5.69650
6.06867
INST FREO
(Hz)
2546.95
5136.55
5332 .10
5913.30
6104.17
6400.38
6665.07
6847.27
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.98027
3.28769
4.27051
4.61597
5.17440
5.69653
6.06866
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00001
-0.00001
-0.00002
-0.00000
0.00001
0.00002
-0.00002
f = INST FREQ * sqrt(l .0 + WBOTC * t) /1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) /(I + 5t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure [decibars]; 5 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
U.UU£
Onm -
UU I
~^n r\ nnn~
D
Onn-i
.UU 1
Onno-
i i i i
.uu^
0
III!
4
i i i i
— •
iii
— • — •• — •
• ^
i i i i
•
_i l_J_
12 3 4 5 6 j
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
D-35
["•I 28-Dec-1 1 1.0000000
CALIBRATIOIV
AFTER
MODIFICATIONS
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 13-Dec-11
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -1.008199e+000
h = 1.5849436-001
i = -1.6160976-003
j = 1.5622226-004
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) =4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = -2.6171e-007
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0. 0000
34.5773
34.5570
34.5129
34.5026
34.4905
34 .4809
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2 .95748
3 .26265
4.23831
4.58122
5.13549
5.65353
INST FREO
(Hz)
2547.18
5069.44
5260.77
5829.60
6016.35
6306.04
6564.14
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0. 00000
2.95760
3 .26256
4.23814
4.58118
5.13585
5.65336
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00013
-0.00009
-0.00017
-0.00004
0.00036
-0.00017
f = INST FREQ * sqrt(1.0 + WBOTC * t) / 1000,0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) / (I + 8t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure [decibars]; 5 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.036
0.018-
•~-
ra 0.000-
T3
-0.018-
-0.036
1 1 1 1
________,--•
lit
i i
i i i i
I I
x
"•" A
I
•
I I I I
) 1 23456
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
D-36
• 3-Apr-06 0.9965748
A 13-Dec-11 1.0000000
~"/
POSTCR;, »'
CALIBRATION
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Dec-l 1
COEFFICIENTS:
PAD = 4.913720e-002
PA1 = 2.405753e-002
PA2 = 2.642862e-009
PTHAO = -7.0960236+001
PTHA1 = 4.9523056-002
PTHA2 = -2.9681016-007
WEBB GLIDER PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
508 psia S/N 9546
PTCAO =
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 =
PTCBO =
PTCB1 =
PTCB2 =
PRESSURE SPAN CALIBRATION
PRESSURE INST THERMISTOR
PSIA
14
105
205
305
404
505
405
305
205
105
14
.74
.00
.01
.00
.99
.00
.00
.01
.03
.04
.74
OUTPUT
600
4352
8505
12656
16802
20944
16803
12657
8507
4353
600
.1
.0
.7
.0
. 1
. 1
.2
.2
.1
.5
.0
OUTPUT
1886
1887
1891
1890
1891
1890
1891
1891
1890
1892
1893
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14
104
204
305
404
504
405
305
205
105
14
.75
.99
.99
.00
.99
.98
.02
.03
.03
.03
.75
ERROR
%FSR
0.
-0.
-0.
0.
-0.
-0.
0.
0.
-0.
-0.
0.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
-1.328415e+001
2.795218e-001
-8.6017876-003
2.4958126+001
8.2500006-004
O.OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
TEMP
ITS90
32.50
29.00
24.00
18.50
15.00
4.50
1.00
PRESS
TEMP
2116.20
2042.80
1940.70
1826.20
1754.40
1537 .40
1466.30
INST
OUTPUT
612.24
613.19
614.20
614 .38
614 .57
613 .38
612.58
TEMP(ITS90)
-5.00
35.00
SPAN(mV)
24.95
24.99
y = thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPA1 * y + PTEMPA2 * y
x = pressure output - PTCAO - PTCA1 * t - PTCA2 * t2
n = x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB1 * t + PTCB2 * t2)
pressure (psia) = PAD + PA1 * n + PA2 * n2
0.50
0.25
- 0.00
nj
•a
-0.25
-0.50
3 5
0 K
1 1 1 L_
)0 1!
i i i i
50 2C
i I i i
10 2£
iO 3t
10 3i
i i i i
>0 4(
10 4!
50 51
)0 550
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
i»|12-Dec-11 0.00
Pressure (PSIA)
D-37
-------
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
CC1218002
0.26
5/21/2012
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
0.2067
/ PASS
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: nvnguyen
Date: 5/22/2012
D-38
-------
SonTek
Hl^^^s^^^9 ^P
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
c
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101493
0.26
5/30/2012
Power
Calibration
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
0.2094
/ PASS
2.9V
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by; dshumway
Date: 6/1/2012
D-39
-------
Appendix E
Deployment 4
7/10/2012 - 7/30/2012
E-1
-------
Fre-Deployment Check Out
E-2
-------
i
DC
8
1)
2) (So
3)
4)
PRE-SEAL
I FORE CHECK]
Check pump & pitch threaded rod
(grease & clean if necessary)
Grounded Nose?
| PAYLOAD CHECK |
Special Sensors / Additional Sensors
Jj -—
2)
Grounded Parts: Fore Sci Ring _
Aft Sci Ring -
Science Bay Weight Configuration
: detect in place, batteries
secure, white guides free, no
\ metal shavings, bottles installed
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD
joint, no leak at pucks
CTD
'Other?
AFT CHECK
Indium Card Installed (SIM #) (if not standard) i^--""
FtasrrCard: old-data removed? —
inspect strain on connectors Battery check
(worn connectors), battery Aft Pack - J13 Voltage
secured, ballast bottle present, aft
cap clean/clear of leak
Aft cap grounded?
Pitch Pack - J13 Voltage 45-.
.Nose Packs - J13 Voltage^S .
^AftEmer-J31 Voltage
POST-SEAL
| GENERAL|
Pick Point Present?
I HARDWARE"!
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirp
Anode grounded?
Special Instruments?
Nose Cone and pump bladder
Anode size / remainder (est)
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear) Ejection weight assembly OK and
Aft sensor —-~ unseized?
Payload sensor -—
l*3
[ POWERED^
Verify Argos ping
Wiggle for 5 minutes
OUTSIDE
Stabilized m_battery
' m_vacuum @ T @ ballast
,
£ . I 2_
Compass Check (reading <® compass)
2)
GPS check
(lat)
(Ion)
Iridium connect
Alt
zero_oceanjDressure, get m_pressure
o
logging on; rotate slowly 360,
logging off, plot data: 360 test
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
E-3
-------
SOFTWARE
GENERAL ~j
Version
Date OK?
delete old logs
Re-bum latest software image
' configure TBDIist
"NBDIist
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
\MAFILES
gptpllp.ma (set x_last_...)
AUTOEXEC.MI
Irid Main: 88160000592
I rid Alt: 15085482446
ujridium_failover_retries = 10
Reset the glider, observe any errors
CACHE MANAGEMENT
c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
f_ballast_pumped_deadz:;width = 30?
"getf_max:_w.0rf
-------
O ,
3
S . gr I
,s i
) i
T)
z.)
5)
U 7.'
&
Zoz.3
I SI?
n
E-5
-------
m
05
MASS (g) COMMENTS
Deployment
2012NJDEP#2
Glider
ru28
Date
7/9/2012
Pj-eparer
David Aragon
Air temp
20
VMC ADDED LAST MINUTE
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
u AFT STEM (red plug, card)
^ AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
0
2
il
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
^'"iJP&^P*
4905.2
6443
4868.7
1154.5
17,1
11924.3
9069.6
9340.8
1451.4
78
305
396,8
nission aeniea )\ifuv^_u/_U3 ruzs NjUhF w z.xis
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate, w/ VMC
1 CF, 1 regular, did not weigh in air
727.5 and 728.9
r^i
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight In Tank (g)
1.0214
21.81
30.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1,0218
24.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
58495
59300.2
1.0138
induced)
7
J7
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A
H MOMENT (rac
Angle of Rotation (before
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0.025 1.4
-0.151 -8.7
0.176 10.1
382
290
107
6.9
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 1 8.71
Adjust by: (g) -11,29
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -1 1 .38
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) 474. 06
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m9)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
58019.892
1021.9
1013.6
1021.94
Average Glider Volume
volume 1 :
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = #DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 1 07 g air/ 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL 148 g weight in water
1019.56 Ballast Sheet (6)
2.38
-------
7/9/2012
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION 5"
€
F
SB
A
I
Ballast Bottles NOTES F~ /\
5H
TANKiT =
(SB19) C =
TANK:T =
(SB19) C
TANK: T =
(Glider) C =
ITERATION
SB
AFT
NOTES
TANKiT =
(SB19) C
TANK: T =
(Glider) C
2012 07_03 ru28 NJDEP )* 2.xls
E-7
Ballast Iterations
-------
7/5/2012
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
TANK;T=
(SB19)C=
ITERATION
TANK:T
(SB19)C=
SB
Ballast Bottles
FORE 1
NOTES
)-gZ
4!7*
TANK: T
: T= 2- I .
(Glider) C=
c-
0 -
B
SB
TANK: T=
(Glider) C=
NOTES
C lA£A£Li_
t>a!*M l-jjj
^^
/ C F =O
ITERATION
(SB19) C =
D =
TANKiT=
SB
A
TANK: T=
(Glider) C=
2012_0r_
-------
6/29/12
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
SB
NOTES
AFT
TANK: T =
(SB19) C =
m
TANK: T= 2QL32_9
.(Glider) cTtffioJ"
,L.
ITERATION
nz. iz£>
F
SB
A
|
NOTES
TANK: T =
TANK: T =
(SB19) C =
D =
(Glider) C =
ITERATION
a
SB
NOTES
5
AFT
ft
TANK: T =
U&Jz,
GJL^diK*!^:. - ~* /
^-rut";
TANK: T =
(SB19) C= (Glider) C =
D =
cc
Glider Ballasting Tern plate-Ixls
E-9
Ballast Iterations
-------
m
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etcVGIider BallasM&$
Deployment
NTSD^ %Z
Glider
^u?%
I .Date
ysm
' Preparer
Air temp
20
£~j
GLIDER
1
1
3
I
WEIGHT
BOTTLES
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
93'
iS^&errnission detG0|j|Mg{frj|>3 ru28 NJDEP # 2.xls
15,8
4965.2
6443
4868.7
11^4.5
17-1
11604.3
485.8
9069.6
93^0.8
1451.4
13'2.8
397.4
396.8
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate
262.5 port side, 253.3 starboard side
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)^
21.81
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0218
24.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
58335
59613,2
1.0219
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
7
7
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0.025
-0.151
0.176
382
290
107
6.9
(deg)
1.4
-8.7
10.1
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 5961 0. 76
Adjust by: (g) 59610.76
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) #DIV/0!
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) -2,44
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
#DIV/0!
#DIV70!
1021.8
0.00
Average Glider Volume
volume 1: 58320
volume 2: 58335
volume 3:
average = 58327.5
MISC Kerns Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 1 07 g air/ 669 Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL i®^asfi$he9*4&)
-------
Ballast Pump Size
Glider Density
Glider Mass
Tank Density
1.0218
59708
1.0221
Glider Reported
pump_volume
Resultant Volume (in air/tank)
Full Retract Scale Weight
FuSI Extend Scale Weight
304
-122
-2247
227
5811995
58536.74
Original Volume
Pump Size
Pump Size (retracted)
Pump Size (extended)
583201
416.789
-216.738
200.0509
% Matched
108.4%
98.1%
106.5%
Max Density Range
3.65
1025.72
1018.42
+- sigma
Max Density (in target)
Min Density (in target)
correct, and accurate, dependencies are exact
dunk weights, tank density and temperature,
as well as units
'
58335
59613.2
E-11
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider Balla^jfcftSS^^ermission derOQMMEOTS^ ru28 NJDEP # 2.xls
Deployment
2012 NJDEP #2
Glider
ru28
Date
7/9/2012
Preparer
David Aragon
Air temp
20
m
Fo
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
45.8
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate
262.5 port side, 253.3 starboard side
9069.6
9340.8
1451.4
72.2
397.4
396.8
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
Glider Specifics
1.0217 Glider Volume (ml)
H MOMENT (rad)
58335 Angle of Rotation (before; 0.025
21.81
-28.00
1.0218
24.00
Total Mass (g) 59582.6
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) 1.0214
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) 7
Volume Change (target) (mL) 7
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A H-distance
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
-0.151
0.176
382
290
107
6.9
(deg)
1.4
-8.7
10.1
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 0.69
Adjust by: (g) 28.69
"• Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) 28.69
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) 28.16
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
er Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
58335,521
1021.3
1020
1021.26
Average Glider Volume
volume 1: 58320
volume 2: 58335
volume 3:
average = 58327.5
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air/ 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL
-------
m
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider BallaE|j|ftlft8g($ermission der®0J\IMEIfr.3)3 nt2S NJDEP # 2.xls
Deployment
2012 NJDEP #2
Glider
ru28
Date
7/9/2012
Preparer
David Aragon
Air temp
20
l\
FORE STEM {altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
9345.8
4905.2
6443
4868.7
1T54.5
17.1
11604.3
515.8
9069.6
9340.8
1451.4
267.3
367.7
357.2
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate
262.5 port side, 253.3 starboard side
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1.0221
Tank Temperature (C) 20.33
Weight in Tank (g) 98.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0215
Target Temperature © 24.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature indu
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
H MOMENT (rad)
58320 Angle of Rotation (before;
59708.4 Angle of Rotation (after)
1.6238 Angle of Rotation
ced) Weight on Spring (after)
1 Weight added
1 Radius of Hull
(note use 53.5 E -£ in above for DE (cartoon))A H-distance
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
0.025
-0.151
0.176
382
290
107
6.9
(deg)
1.4
-8.7
10.1
Should Hang (in tank) (g) -24.64
Adjust by: (g) -122.64
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -122.64
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) -122.81
Glider
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
er Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
58320.164
1023.6
1023.6
1023.60
Average Glider Volume
volume 1: 58320
volume 2;
volume 3:
average = 58320
MISC Kerns Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air/ 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets. Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider Balla!H!fc«8q[$ermission derfl^MMEIfrS)3 ru28 NJDEP # 2.xls
Deployment
2012 NJDEP #2
Glider
ru28
Date
7/9/2012
Preparer
David Aragon
m
Air temp
20
z.
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
9345.8
4905,2
6180.2
4868.7
1154.5
17.1
11611.3
515.8
9069.6
9340.8
1451.4
259.1
367.7
357.2
w/o bottle
wing rails
262.5 port side, 253-3 starboard side
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/m!_) 1.0221
Tank Temperature (C) 20.33
Weight in Tank (g) -42.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0215
Target Temperature © 24.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL) 581
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) 1.(
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) 1
Volume Change (target) (mL) 11
(note use 53,5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon))A H-distance
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
H MOMENT (rad)
90.9 Angle of Rotation (before)
59444.4 Angle of Rotation (after)
215 Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
290
107
#DIV/0!
Should Hang (in tank) (g) -24.59
Adjust by:(g) 17.41
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g)
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g)
17.41
9i29
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
er Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
58198.848
1021.2
1021.3
1021.20
Average Glider Volume
volume 1: 58182.9
volume 2: 58198.85
volume 3:
average = 58190.88
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air / 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL 1
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check
Deployment
2012NJDEP#2
Glider
ru28
,
Date
7/9/2012
Preparer
David Aragon
Air temp
20
m
Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
uj AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
93
ru28 NJDEP # 2.xls
45.8
4905.2
6180.2
4868.7
1154.5
r
11611.3
515.8
9069.6
9340.8
14*51.4
417.5
428.3
417.9
w/o bottle
wing rails
262.5 port side, 253.3 starboard side
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1.0221
Tank Temperature (C) 20.33
Weight in Tank (g) 254.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0220
Target Temperature © 15.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
58182.9
59724.1
1.0265
1
-17
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A H-distance
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
290
107
#DIV/0!
Should Hang (in tank) (g) -24.12
Adjust by: (g) -278.12
* Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Gilder Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -278.12
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) -278.12
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
er Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m9)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
58182.901
1026.8
1026.8
1026.78
Average Glider Volume
volume 1: 58182.9
volume 2:
volume 3:
average =
MISC Kerns Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air / 65 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL
-------
MASS (g)
COMMENTS
Deployment
vrsYsVP
\M J V\~ \
Glider
?A\?9\
r^u*- (j
Date
3t4ll
Preparer
^VWVMSA
-$rifstA£
Air temp
20
m
j FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
jFORE HULL
u JAFT STEM (red plug, card)
o *
$ JAFT HULL
jCOWLING
1 SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
o |PAYLOAD BAY
3 WINGS
2 lOTHER
ffl jAFT BATTERY
pj {PITCH BATTERY
2 jFORE BATTERY 1, 2
JAFT BOTTLE
| g IFORE BOTTLE 1 (startoard)
| o IFORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
lOTHER
9,&
Cf3^o.&
145-i.f
mfc
5^^
-w.^--
w^o SD&H-k
2.55-3 2GZ.5" pick point? Fish finder?
725.0 ^ZM
1S°1.|
302-2
359,2
Tank Specifics Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) jGlkler Volume (mL) 50800
Tank Temperature (C) jTotal Mass (g) 0
Weight in Tank (g) j Z^.OO J Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) | 0.0000
Target Specifics Volume Change (temperature induced)
Target Density (g/mL) I -02 jVolume Change (tank) (mL) j -71
Target Temperature © j \5-tP iVolume Change (target) (mL) j_ 0
(rote use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE ^cartoon)) A
H MOMENT (rad
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
)
0
290
107
#DJV/6i
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
E-17
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Gilder Aanderaa Qptode Check IN/OUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coeffdent Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN:
1504
IN / OUT
OUT
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 3/23/2012
Previous:
PERFORMED BY:
Current:
Amanda
COCoef 4.5E-H53 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+G2 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -S.3E-06 1.0E-Q7 -7.1E-10
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E-KX3 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E+OQ -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
C3Coef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
0.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution: 15.0 g/ 1500 ml NSjSO3
Spark Unuit 4 T Probe Cross reference
23.391 Temperature
1006.434 Air Pressure (hPa)
Sample Bottle C WInkler Label
LaMotte 7414 - Aztde mod WInkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 71.12 Dphase
0.02 % Saturation
23.03 Temperature
0.07 Cone (calculated) (uM)
0.03 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 0 Concentration (u.M)
(0, 0, 0} (0 - 2 |uM) (Tltratfons) (ppm)
0 % Saturation
(worst case @ 2 \M = ,04 % or 0% )
DELTAS:
0.07 Cone A 0.03 %A
0.361 Temp A 23.2105 Temp avg
100% Point
Solution: NA
Castaway
10.07
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
1006.095
Sample A, Sample B
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 33.9
97.34
10.09
338.13 Cone
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (u.M)
96.76 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 343.75
(10.20,10.20)
98.75
DELTAS:
-5.62 Cone A
-0.02 Temp A
Concentration
(Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
-1.99 %A
10.08 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Chetk
SATURATION:
98.42
@TEMP
25.42
@ PRESS
997.968
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
E-18
7/19/2012 12:15 PM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (mL)
(2.0 ± .1} (EPA Compliance)
Paste confia report all from oofode
FoiINo
COCoef
CICoef
C2Coef
CSCoef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAtrPhas
CalAirTemi
CalAirPres:
CalZeroPh,
CalZeroTer
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIODelay
SoftwareVi
Softwares
SRIODelay
SoftwareVi
SoftwareBi
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
_5014_
5014
5014
5014
1504 5009
1504 4537,931 -162.595 3.29574 -0.02793
1504 -250.953 8.02322 -0.1584 0.001311
1504 5.664169 -0.15965 0.003079
-0.05994 0.001483
1504
1504 0.000244 -5.3E-06
-2.5E-05
-2.8E-05 2.15E-07
1E-07 -7.1E-10
1504
0
1504 32.99431
1504 10.29875
1504 1026.47
1504 65.21005
1504 24.86774
2
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
_1504_
1504
1504
1504
0
1
-1
3
_2
-1
3
24
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
E-19
7/19/2012 12:15 PM
-------
Deployment Checklist
E-20
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
Date
Where
6?5
f O*
^p vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
7?
<3 3 aetm battery * 3
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerup!)
In Water
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status, mi
zero_ocean_pressure
run Od.mi (with or without float, ask RU)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run shallow.mi
or deep, mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
get m_battery
ft « i ^ get m_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boofapp
reports boot application
mission completed normally?
Iwhite glider in water
glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
rsend *.sbd" is most important
applies moreso to when handed off to indium)
(glider should dive and not reappear) (report to Rutgers or steam out slowly once it dr
Perform CTD Comparison CAST -~^ Jtvpi lly done with RU provided SBE1 9 or Cast Away CTD
LONV5' W (2."
1.5
u.
-------
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
Date •
Where
iVK
€-6f(L
T
Recovery
get Lat/Lon from email or shore [ |
support
obtain freewave comms
obtain lat/lon with where command
Perform CTD Comparison CAST [
LAT:
LON: 7V
(note instrument type!)
7
E-23
-------
Post-Deployment Ciiecklist
E-24
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Check-IN
DATE:
GLIDER:
SB:
Vehicle Powered
/. Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
2. Wiggle vehicle for 5 minutes.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone /
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and
remove altimeter or leave
temporarily attached *
3. Retract pump -
4. Remove altimeter and hose
diaphragm removing all sand,
sediment, bio oils
5, Clean nose cone and altimeter
*
Tail cone
1. Remove-tail-cone
2. Hose and clean anode and air ^
bladder making sure air bladder is
completely clean
3. Clean cowling -
Wing rails /-
1. Remove wing rails and hose down /
Tail plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean
plug if especially dirty ^/
2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly
insert and remove to clean the /
glider plug
3. Compress air glider female
connector
~~4:— Lightly si!icon~red~phig^and
replace in glider once silicon has /
been dispersed evenly in the plugs
CTD Comparison Check
1, Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SBE19 ._ ^ e _ Glider (SBE41CP or &^e^ unit)
Temperature: JLi• \\ A ( Temperature: xSUU 6 *_C-
Conductivity:
Conductivity:
//,
3.
DO NOT DELETE DATA OFF CARDS
Change permissions on folder to read, write, execute for owner and group, and read,
execute for everyone
4. Remove, used batteries and place in return crate •/
5. Re-assemble glider with a vacuum
E-25
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode, Seabird
Slocum Payload CTD, YSI
Castaway CTD, and
Seabird 19 CTD
E-26
-------
a xylem brand
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622, Dec 2005
Sensing Fdl Bateh No:
Certificate No:
5009
5014W 1504 1129
Product: 5014
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23,2012
This is to certify thai this product has been calibrated uaina the fallowing instruments:
Fluke CHUB E-4
Fluke 56 15 HIT
Fluke 5615 PRT
Honeywell PPT
Calibration Bafli model FNT 321-1-40
Serial NaA7C6T7
Serial No. 849155
Serial No. 802054
Serial No. 44074
1
Calibration points ud readings:
Temperature (°C)
Readins(mV)
Giving these coeffldents
Index
TmpCoef
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
2.37279E-HJ1
1
-3.0595 1E-02
2
2.83023EO6
-
-
3
^.19785E-09
*Hotc: Temperature calibration NOT performed
iQiyjen;
Ring*
Accuncy":
Rewluticm:
SettUoiTlinB(63«}:
O2Coaooatmioa
0-500 nM"
< ±8pM or ±5%{ whichever is greater)
AIrPntain(hPi)
AirSantnwdWattr
3.29943&fOI
1.02988E401
1.02647E403
Zm Solution (NftoSQi)
6.52I01E+01
2.48677B+01
GiTiigftMecoeffldente
Index
PfatteCoef
0
-6.62372E400
1
1.20407E+00
2
O.OOOOOB+00
3
O.OOOOOE-fOO
;> Valid for 0 to 2000m (6562ft) depth, salinity 33 - 37ppi
**The calibration it performed In fresh water and the salinity setting is set to: 0
March 23, 2012
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
182 Eut Street. MM B Aflfeboro, MA 02703 Td. +1 (501) 226-9300
E-27
-------
a xylem brand
Sensing Foil Batch No: 5009
CerOCcate No: 3853 5009 40217
CALIBRATION CIRTIPICATE
Form No, 62I.Dec 2005
Product: O2 Sensing Foil PSO 3853
CaHbntfon Date 8 February 2010
dUbrHton potato and phur rMdtogs (degrees)
TfflU|hflJlilU'f' \C*J
Pressure (hPa)
02k%of02+N2
aoo
1.00
2,00
5.00
10.00
20.90
30.00
3.97
tffjBG
73.18
68.01
64.39
55.&J
46.27
35.09
2^.85
10.93
977.00
72.63
^7702
63.19
S.i6
44.47
35!55
28.30
20.15
977.00
71.62
65.42
61.20
51.76
41.97
31.14
MM
2932
977.00
7ttft
63.92
59.44
4956
39.75
2^.24
^4.64
38.39
977.00
6^.77
62.31
3737^
4^.45
37.69
2736^
^3.19
Giving these coefficients''
fodwt
COCoeffidem
ClOoefficteiU
C2 Coefficient
C3 Coefficient
C4Coeffid«u
0
4.53793E403
-2.509S3fcfSz
5.66417E4teniic.com
E-28
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622. Dec 2005
a xylem brand
Sendog Foil Batch N« 5009
Certificate No: 5014W 1504 1 1 29
Data from Coo! Down Test:
4 -
li
™ o -
a -1 4
1
Cool Down Test
Product; 5014
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23, 2012
?S2 • —
i 301) 400 600 SOO*^HaQO 1200
14OO IfiOO 1800
^~^\^_
- ^__
Sample No,
— — so 1504 - Temperature
- on
8
°G
. ic B
I
• 10 B
5H
. n
Max Error = 2,166
SR10 ScaUng Coefficients:
At the SR10 output the Oxygen Optode 3830 can give either absolute oxygen concentration in [iM or air saturation in
%. The setting of the internal property "Output"S), controls the selection of the unit. The coefficients for converting
SR10 raw data to engineering units are fixed.
Output o-i
A-0
B = 4.883E-01
C = 0
D = 0
Oxyyai (uM) = A + BN + CN2 + DN3
Ou^mto-2
A = 0
B=1.465&01
C=0
D-0
Oxygen {%) = A + BN + CN2 + EW3
3> The default output setting is set to -1
Date:
March 23,2012
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
Aaatesa Data fBstnmeas, &K.
182 East Street Sate B Atdebora, MA 02703 Td.+1 (508) 226-9300 ena^: fafeUSA@xylnBfac.c«a
E-29
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1)425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: ! I-Dec-11
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO =• -6.4430706-005
al = 3.0695316-004
a2 - -4.6559746-006
a3 - 2.0448006-007
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0001
18.5002
24.0000
29.0000
2-^SQ.OO
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
581271.2
496277.6
315060.0
272494.8
218238.0
179458.2
1530.17- •-,
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5001
15.0001
18.5001
24.0002
28.9999
'2_5GOO
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
-0.0000
0.0001
-0.0000
-0.0001
0.0002
-0.0001
0-.OOOQ
Temperature ITS-90 - !/{aO + al[/«(n)] + a2[/«2(n)] + a3[/«3(n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual ~ instrument temperature - bath temperature
0,02
0.01
o
(I)
to
3
T)
I
o:
0.00
-0.01
-0.02-
I I I I
I I I I
till
I I I I
I I
Jill
I I I I
-50 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature, Degrees C
30
35
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
Ft 11-Dec-11 -0.00
E-30
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: 1 t-Dec-l I
COEFFICIENTS:
g - -9.7162546-001
h = 1.4340266-001
i = -4.3640556-004
j = 5.2873906-005
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,I5,0) - 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-00a
CTcor = 3.2500e-006
WBOTC = 2.55406-007
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1 .0000
4.5000
15. 0001
18.5002
24. 0000
on Anon
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.8264
34.6059
34.7625
34.7533
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.97675
3.28384
4.26572
4.61093
34.7433 5.16897
T4 71 7-3 —
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Belfevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: 09-Dec-U
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
1450 psia S/N 3459007
COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = 1.8088526-001
PA1 = 4.7951186-003
PA2 = -2.5294506-011
PTEMPAO - -7.4044726+001
PTEMPA1 = 4.7582296-002
PTEMPA2 = -1.458957e-007
PRESSURE SPAN CALIBRATION
PRESSURE INST THERMISTOR
PSIA OUTPUT OUTPUT
14.75 528113.0 2035.0
315.06 590761.0 2036.0
615.08 653406.0 2036.0
1215.11 778833 .0 2037.0
1465.09 831126.0 2037.0
1215.07 778837.0 2036.0
915.03 716102.0 2037.0
615.03 653412.0 2036.0
315.03 590766.0 2036.0
14.75 528101.0 2035.0
i —
PTCAO =
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 -
PTCBO =
PTCB1 -
PTCB2 =
5.2502726+005
5.2703426-002
7.4331016-002
2.5389386+001
2.7500006-004
O.OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14.79
315.02
615.03
•m c f\A
*rj^~rv^~
1215.11
1465.06
1215.13
915.08
615.05
315.04
14.74
ERROR
%FSR
0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.00
TEMP THERMISTOR INST
ITS90 OUTPUT
32.50 2255
29.00 2180
24.00 2074
15.00 1882
4.50 1659
1.00 1585
TEMP(ITS90)
-5.00
35.00
OUTPUT
528186.00
526173.80
528155.80
528122.60
528110.00
528109.00
SPAN(mV)
25.39
25.40
y - thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPAI * y + PTEMPA2 * y2
x = pressure output - PTCAO - PTCAI * t- PTCA2 * t2
n - x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB1 * t + PTCB2 » t2)
pressure (psia) = PAO + PA I * n + PA2 * n2
o.;
o.c
-o.;
-L_i .L-
ill!
, 1 1 1
J _l_ L I
1 t 1 |
till
i i
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
! • | 09-Deo.11 -0.00
Pressure (PSIA)
E-32
-------
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D1 01493
0.26
5/30/2012
Power
Calibration
Standby Mode (A)
0.2094
1 PASS
j^ f\W J
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: dshumway
Date: 6/1/2012
E-33
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Believue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (428) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www4eablrd.com
Suvic*
69172
Customer Information:
Company Rutgers
6/14/2012 _,
Contact
David Aragon
IPO Numbar J S1665726
Ssrial Number
Modal Number I
Service* Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
Problems Found:
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday. June 14,2012
Page 1 of 2
E-34
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Beltovue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9886 Fax: (425) 643-9964 www.s0ablrd.com
Customer ii ilwi i
Services Requested:
6*172
PO Number S1665728
Modal Number I j 8BE 19-03
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2. Perform Routine Calibration Service.
ProbwtTM Found:
1. The Y-cable had some corrosion damage on pins and had previously been repaired by customer. Will be
replaced with PN 17709 Y-cable.
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
I Installed NEW pump / data Y-cable.
. Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
*
Special Notes;
Thursday, June 14, 201 2
Page 2 of 2
E-35
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabind@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 17-May-12
SBE19 TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
g - 4.204530056-003
h = 5. 97712451e
i = 5.150779966
j = -1.52678800s
fO = 1000.0
BATH TEMP
(1TS-90)
0. 9999
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32:5ffO-0
-004
-006
-006
INSTRUMENT FREO
(Hz)
2563.761
2774.062
3478.313
3738.690
4175.001
4601.563
=4'91'7. 63"^=
IPTS-68 COEFFICIENTS
a » 3.64763497e-003
b = 5.84092998e-004
C = 9.487757786-006
d = -1.526277976-006
fO = 2563.761
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4997
15.0000
18.5002
23.9997
29.0000
—52. SW1
.
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.00010
-0.00018
0.00004
0.00024
-0.00026
-0.00002
. 00007
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{g + h[ln(fQ/f)] + l[ln\fa/f)] + j[/«3(ffl/f)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Temperature IPTS-68 = l/{a + b[/«(f0/0] + c(ln(fQ/fj] + d[/w3(f0/f)]} -273.15 (*Q
Following the recommendation of JPOTS: T is assumed to be 1.00024 * T (-2 to 35 °C)
6s 90
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
Date, Offset(mdeg C)
0.02
0.01
0
Q. 0.00
T3
I
-0.01
-0.02
I 1 I I
• 4
-* *
i i i i
i t i i
<
"~ i
iii
— — •—
, •+-
••-
u.
f
50 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature, Degrees C
E-36
i i i
f 10-May-11 1.56
~± 17-May-12 0.00
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer: ||Rutgers
Job'Number: || 69172 |
Model Number: 1 1 SBE 19-03 |
(Date of Report: ||
(Serial Number: ||
5/21/2012 ]
199618-1645
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift. If
the caJibraiion identifies a problem, then a second calibration Is performed after work Is completed. The 'as received'
calibration Is not performed If the sensor Is damaged or nonfunctional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must cboose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
during deployment, In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient'offset'allows a small correction for
drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a repair apply only to
subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' * Performed Not Performed
Date: | 5/17/2012 | Drift since last cal: Lj0.00153_j Degrees Celsius/year
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER REPAIR' Performed * Not Performed
Date: | | Drift since Last cal:
E-37
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 17-May-12
SBE19 CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Seimens/meter
GHIJ COEFFICIENTS
g - -4.0479455364-000
h = 4.828415066-001
i - 1,241623536-003
j - -3.13086509e-OOS
CPcor = -9
CTcor m 3
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
0.9999
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
.57006-008
.25006-006
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
35.0146
34.9937
34.9505
34.9406
34. 928b
34.9182
34.9078
(nominal)
(nominal)
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99128
3.29980
4.28633
4.63307
5 . 19347
5.71712
6.09014
ABCDM COEFFICIENTS
a - 5 .10588664e-002
b - 4.276666736-001
c = -4.031661396+000
d - -1
m f 2
CPcor
INSTFREO
(kHz)
2.88554
8.31658
8.68395
9.76514
10.11731
rTJT6"6172
11.14627
11.47892
.196434646-004
.1
<• -9.57006-008 (nominal)
INSTCOND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99124
3.29982
4.28642
4.63307
5.T934D
5.71707
6.09020
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00005
0.00002
0.00009
-0.00001
-0.00~00
-0.00005
0.00006
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) /10(1 + 8t + ep) Siemens/meter
Conductivity = (afm + bf2 + c + dt) / [10 (1 4«p) Siemens/meter
t - temperature[°C)J; p = pressurefdecibars); 8 = CTcor, 6 = CPcor,
Residual = (instrument conductivity - bath conductivity) using g, h, i, j coefficients
Date, Slope Correction
U.UU£~
Onni -i
.UUT
TB" n nnn.
Residue
> c
I \
n nno-
i i i
i i i i
1
i i i i
^
i i i i
*-"* ""
-^-.
i i i i
•• *
i i i i
-u,uu*
0123456
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
E-38
>
A
i i
>
i i
L» 10-May-11 0.9998533
"^ 17-May-1 2 1.0000000
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seablrd.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
[Customer; J [Rutgers
{Job Number: || 69172 | [Pate of Reporti|| 5/21/2012
[Model Number:|[ S8E19-03 j [Serial Numb€rT|| 199618-1645
Conductivity season ere normally calibrated 'at received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or Indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration Is
performed after work Is completed. The 'as received' calibration Is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request
An 'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether die 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment, in SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'slope' allows small
corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a
repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' v Performed Not Performed
Date: [5/17/2012] Drift since last cal: | -0.00040 |PSU/mooth*
'CALIBRATION AFTER CLEANING & REPLATINIZING' Performed ^ Not Performed
Date: [ | Drift since Last cal: | | PSU/montfa*
C/onnooxtsi
*Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatinizing tend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift in
post-cleaning-calibration indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit.
E-39
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 22-May-12
QUADRATIC COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = 7.374722e+001
PA1 = -1.962260e-002
PA2 = 7.626656e-008
SBE19 PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
150 psia S/N 169585 TCV: -105
STRAIGHT LINE FIT:
M = -1.964407e-002
B = 7.416500e+001
PRESSURE
PSIA
14.57
29.80
59.69
94.83
124.81
149.79
124.82
94.85
—59.ff3
29.86
14.58
INST
OUTPUT(N)
3050.0
2265.0
728.0
-1068.0
-2578.0
-3812.0
-2584.0
-1078.0
-71TTO
2255.0
3047.0
COMPUTED
PSIA
14.61
29.69
59.50
94.79
124.84
149.66
124.96
94.99
by.aj
29.89
14.67
ERROR
%FS
0.02
-0.07
-0.13
-0.03
0.02
-0.09
0.09
0.10
ortro
0.02
0.06
LINEAR
PSIA
14.25
29.67
59.86
95.14
124.81
149.05
124.93
95.34
50.20
29.87
14.31
ERROR
%FS
-0.21
-0.09
0.12
0.21
0.00
-0.49
0.07
0.33
0.24
0.01
-0.18
Straight Line Fit:
Pressure (psia) = M*N + B(N = binary output)
Quadratic Fit:
pressure (psia) - PAO + PA1 * N + PA2 * N2
Residual = (instrument pressure - true pressure) * 100 / Full Scale Range
0.50
0.25
*
IT o.oo
-0.25
-0.50
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
fjl 22-May-12 0.00
25
50
75 100
Pressure (PSIA)
125
150
E-40
-------
Appendix F
Deployment 5
8/14/2012 - 8/30/2012
F-1
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
F-2
-------
GLIDER
PREPARER
PREP DATE
LOCATION
Ruz?
t*^&. ^Ko^
% fa 1(2 £]
PRE-SEAL
FORE CHECK
5 3^-vt, H*»U-
SCIENCE BAY
SERIAL NUMBERS
1) COS?/k
2) o,U
?rJ \ Sng
3) f
4}
Check pump & pitch threaded rod
(grease & clean if necessary)
Grounded Nose?
PAYLOAD CHECK |
Special Sensors / Additional Sensors
1)
2)
Grounded Parts: Fore Sci Ring
Aft Sci Ring
Science Bay Weight Configuration
Leak detect in place, batteries
secure, white guides free, no
metal shavings, bottles installed
CTD cable clear, no leak at CTD
joint, no leak at pucks
/
Other?
AFT CHECK
Iridium Card Installed (SIM #) (if not standard)
Flash Card: old data removed? f^o
inspect strain on connectors
(worn connectors), battery
secured, ballast bottle present, aft
cap clean/clear of leak
Aft cap grounded? <-"
Battery check
Aft Pack-J13 Voltage
Pitch Pack - J13 Voltage
Nose Packs - J13 Voltage
Aft Emer - J31 Voltage
POST-SEAL
I GENERAL |
Pick Point Present?
HARDWARE |
Special Instruments?
put c_ait_time 0, verify alt chirp
Anode grounded?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion, clear)
Aft sensor
Payload sensor
\f
Nose Cone and pump bladder
inspection
Anode size / remainder (est)
" Ejection weight assembly OK and
unseized?
./
POWERED!
Verify Argos ping
„ Stabilized m_battery
Wiggle for 5 minutes ;/"* m vacuum @ T @ ballast 1 ,{1
\ OUTSIDE |
Compass Check (reading @ compass)
2)3<4fc LSJSfi 1^
3)"S|0 O?7 : ~*W&
4) J5 l(i,to 53
logging on; rotate slowly 360, ,
logging off, plot data: 360 test "
GPS check
(lat) VbTJt.JS (loo) 7^ £':-2£-
Iridium connect ^/ Alt u^"
zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
- 6.0^0 1?'"" O T>
let air bladder inflate, does it shut off?
131
-------
SOFTWARE
GENERAL ~1
Version
Date OK?
delete old logs
Re-bum latest software image
'configure TBDIist
"NBDIist
\CONFIG
simul.sim deleted
\MAF1LES
gotoJIO.ma (set x_last_...)
AUTOEXEC.MI
Irid Main: 88160000592
IridAlt: 15085482446
u iridium failover retries = 10
Reset the glider, observe any errors
CACHE MANAGEMENT |
del.,\state\cache\*.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ..\state\cache\*.cac _^
send*.mbd*.sbd*.tbd
_c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
f_bailast_pumped_deadz_width = 60?
get f_max_working_depth ("1 02 m)
v
|Q
* Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the
software image locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass
freewave transfer of the files. Save these files or prepare the to-gtider with these files
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_ail_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
OPTODE
Check in completed?
-------
8/10/2012
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER: Q U'ZC& DATE:
ITERATION
H (^ 12_(|
FCR A
913 M
i ' <
n-H ^(
TANK:T= £.7. ?>
(SB19) C= 4.^
*D = tOZZ*1Z
ITERATION
||1
FCD A
4C^ Q
TANKiT =
(SB19) C =
D =
ITERATION
ll-z. IZC
FCD A
, ^
<^Z 5C
TANKsT =
(SB19) C =
D =
•|
Ballast Bottles NOTES -y^U ^ Oi.riCo^ rDu
I FORE1 2>°l^.H-
FORE 2 390,*?)
AFT 132..^,
g,
TANK: T= ZZ.^fj-
(Glider) C= L4,^S&
A 4
Ballast Bottles NOTES ^(\\\ ^ "Q.OQT.C
FORE 1
FORE 2
AFT
4
TANK: T =
(Glider) C =
Ballast Bottles NOTES
I FORE1 14I.
-------
MASS (g)
COMMENTS
Deployment
Ort-1 O M iniTD * 1
ZU1Z NJUbr W 6
Glider
_, _OO
ru28
Date
8/13/12
Preparer
uav@ i\ ot onannon
Air temp
9ft-_
r c—-^ A n / ~~~"x
VVjuivrA^- ^)
^ -~""
S
0
0
1
1
SI
1
2
il
11
IFORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
iFORE HULL
JAFT STEM (red plug, card)
lAFT HULL
jCOWLING
JSCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
iPAYLOADBAY
iWINGS
jOTHER
JAFT BATTERY
iPITCH BATTERY
iFORE BATTERY 1,2
iAFT BOTTLE
IFORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
IFORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
jOTHER
9100.4
9378.4
1464
10.7
241.4
333.4
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate, w/ VMC
1 CF, 1 regular, did not weigh in air
Tank Specifics Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) | 1.0227 iGlider Volume (ml_)
Tank Temperature (C) 1 22.33 iTotal Mass (g)
Weight in Tank (g£ | -100.00 iGlider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
58495
n/a
#VALUE!
Target Specifics Volume Change (temperature induced)
Target Density (g/mL) j 1.0213 jVolume Change (tank) (mL) 10
Target Temperature © ! 25,00 JVolume Change (target) (mL) [ 8
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) *
H MOMENT (red)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0.066
-0.0925
0.1585
358
286
114
7.9
(leg)
3.8
-5.3
9.1
CD
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
Should Hang (in tank) (g) -87.21
Adjust by: (g) 12.79
* Ballasting Attemativo (known VOLUME) (don't have to
weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) #VALUE!
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) #VALU E !
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m1)
#VALUE!
ffVALUEl
#VALUE!
1021.03
Average Glider Volume
volume 1:
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = #DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air/ 66 g V\feter
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 1 61 mL 148 g weight in water
1019.56
1.47
Ballast Sheet (6)
-------
Macintosh HD:Users:rucoo!:Downloads:2012 08 09 ru28 NJDEP3.xls
MASS (a)
COMMENTS
Deployment
2012NJDEP#2
Glider
ru28
Date
7/9/12
Preparer
David Aragon
Air temp
20
OUDER
a
|
i
%
at
I
WEIGHT
BOTTLES
iFORE STEM {altimeter bottle)
IFORE HULL
iAFT STEM (red plug, card)
IAFT HULL
JCOWLING
jSCREWS (vacuum, coding, aft battery)
jPAYLOADBAY
| WINGS
jOTHER
[AFT BATTERY
i PITCH BATTERY
JFORE BATTERY 1,2
iAFT BOTTLE
iFORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
IFORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
jOTHER
9345.8
4905.2
6443
4868.7
1154.5
17.1
11604.3
485.8
9069.6
9340.8
1451.4
132.8
397.4
396.8
w/o bottle, w/ fish finder, w/optode
wing rails, w/o aft cable plate
262.5 port side, 253.3 starboard side
727.5 and 728.9
Tank Specifics i Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) iGlider Volume (ml)
Tank Temperature (C) 21.81 [Total Mass (g)
Weight in Tank (g) Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
58335
59613.2
1.0219
Target Specifics \ Volume Change (temperature induced)
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0218 | Volume Change (tank) (ml)
Target Temperature © 24.00 JVolume Change (target) (mL)
7
7
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before)
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H -distance
0.025
-0.151
0.176
382
290
107
6.9
(deg)
1.4
-8.7
10.1
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
b
Should Hang (in tank) (g)
59610.76
Adjust by: (g)
59610.76
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g)
#DIV/0!
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g)
-2.44
• Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't have to
weight parts!)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
SOIV/0!
Average Glider Volume
volume 1:
volume 2:
volume 3:
average =
58320
58335
58327.5
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
#DIV/0!
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
1021.8
Glider Density 4 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
0.00
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air / 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/mount) 161 mL
-
-------
RU28 OPTODE SN1504
BEFORE
Protect 5014 1504
PhaseCoef 5014
O.OOOOOOE+00
Tempcoef 5014
-4.197852E-09
FoilNO 5014 1504
COCoef 5014 1504
-2.792849E-02
Clcoef 5014
1.311410E-03
C2Coef 5014
-2.462650E-05
CSCoef 5014
2.151560E-07
C4Coef 5014
-7.143200E-10
Salinity 5014
CalAirPhase 5014
CalAirTemp 5014
CalAirPressure 5014
CalzeroPhase 5014
CalZeroTemp 5014
interval 5014
Ancoef 5014 1504
Output 5014 1504
SRlODelay 5014
Softwareversion 5014
SoftwareBuild 5014
RU28 OPTODE SNl504.txt
0
1504 -6.623718E+00
1504 2.372790E+01
1.204068E+00
-3.059506E-02
O.OOOOOOE+00
2.830229E-06
5009
4.537931E+03
1504 -2.509530E+02
5.664169E+00
-5.994490E-02
2.436140E-04
1504
1504
1504
-1.625950E+02
8.023220E+00
-1.596469E-01
1.483260E-03
-5.267590E-06
1504 O.OOOOOOE+00
1504 3.299431E+01
1504 1.029875E+01
1504 1.026470E+03
1504 6.521005E+01
1504 2.486774E+01
1504 2
O.OOOOOOE+00 l.OOOOOOE+00
1
1504 -1
1504 3
1504 24
3.295740E+00
-1.583980E-01
3.079099E-03
-2.821099E-05
1.000640E-07
AFTER
Protect 5014
Phasecoef
O.OOOOOOE+00
Tempcoef
-4.197852E-09
Foi1 No 5014
COCoef 5014
-2.792849E-02
Clcoef 5014
1.311410E-03
C2Coef 5014
-2.462650E-05
C3C06f 5014
2.151560E-07
C4Coef 5014
-7.143200E-10
Salinity
CalAi rPhase
CalAirTemp
CalAirPressure
CalzeroPhase
CalZeroTemp
interval
Ancoef 5014
Output 5014
1504
5014
5014
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504 -
1504
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
1504
1504
1504 -6.623718E+00
1504 2.372790E+01
1.204068E+00
-3.059506E-02
O.OOOOOOE+00
2.830229E-06
5009
4.537931E+03
-2.509530E+02
5.664169E+00
5.994490E-02
2.436140E-04
-1.625950E+02
8.023220E+00
-1.596469E-01
1.483260E-03
-5.267590E-06
1504 3.200000E+01
1504 3.299431E+01
1504 1.029875E+01
1504 1.026470E+03
1504 6.521005E+01
1504 2.486774E+01
1504 2
O.OOOOOOE+00 l.OOOOOOE+00
101
Page 1
3.295740E+00
-1.583980E-01
3.079099E-03
-2.821099E-05
1.000640E-07
F-8
-------
RU28 OPTODE SNl504.txt
SRlODelay 5014 1504 -1
softwareversion 5014 1504 3
SoftwareBuild 5014 1504 24
page 2
F-9
-------
J J
'T^1
,
5s) ,711 3?
0 I-S7
Z45
316-5H
F-10
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
F-11
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Qbsetvation Lab
Slocum Glider Aanderaa Optode Check LN/QUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coefficient Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN:
1504
IN / OUT IN 7/31/2012
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 3/23/2012
Previous:
PERFORMED BY:
Current:
Amanda
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
C2Coef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
C2Coef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
0.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution:
Sample
15.0 g/ 1500 ml
Castaway CTD
38.38
1009.82
C, Sample D
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
NajS03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
WInkler Source
Results:
OPTODE:
0.31
0.15
WINKLER:
70.04
0.099
38.3
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
Cone (calculated) ftiM)
% Saturation (calculated)
0
(0,0) {0-2 MM)
0
(worst case @ 2 \iM = .04 %
DELTAS:
0.31 Cone A
0.08 Temp A
Concentration (u,M)
(Titratlons) (ppm)
% Saturation
orO%)
0.15 %A
38.34Tempavg
100% Point
Solution: NA
Castaway CTD
10.75
1010.16
Sample A, Sample B
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
NazS03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 33.57
97.63
10.68
336.2 Cone
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (uM)
97.34 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 331.25
(10.8,10.4)
95.57
DELTAS:
4.95 Cone A
0.07 Temp A
Concentration
(Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
1.77 %A
10 715 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Cheat
SATURATION: 97.38
@TEMP
23
@ PRESS
1005.4
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
F-12
8/7/2012 3:00 PM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (mp
2.05
(2.0 ± .1) (EPA Compliance)
Paste confia report at! from optode
Protect
PhaseCoef
TempCoef
FoilNo
COCoef
CICoef
CZCoef
CSCoef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAirPhas
CalAirTem)
CalAirPres:
CalZeroPh;
CalZeroTer
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIODelay
SoftwareVi
SoftwareBi
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
0
-6.62372
23.7279
5009
4537.931
-250.953
5.664169
-0.05994
0.000244
0
32.99431
10.29875
1026.47
65.21005
24.86774
2
0
1
-1
3
24
1.204068 0 0
-0.0306 2.83E-06 -4.2E-09
-162.595 3.29574 -0.02793
8.02322 -0.1584 0.001311
-0.15965 0.003079 -2.5E-05
0.001483 -2.8E-05 2.15E-07
-5.3E-06 1E-07 -7.1E-10
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
F-13
8/7/2012 3:00 PM
-------
Optode SN
100%
Spark:
Air Pressure
Temperature 1
Temperature 2
Temperature 3
Temperature 4
Castaway Temperature
Optode:
Concentration
Saturation
Temperature
D Phase
Titration 1
Titration 2
Titration 3
0%
Spark:
Air Pressure
Temperature 1
Temperature 2
Temperature 3
Temperature 4
Castaway Temperature
Optode:
Concentration
Saturation
Temperature
D Phase
Water (L)
Na2S03 (g)
Sample A
Sample B
Sample C
1504- ( $ o i 4-)
•1"\ S 3 -^ 10)0.
5-1- s '
S» ••?!
CO << ~1
& \ .1 W>
/ 0.^5
3 ^ . fe^ I0-+fpn
, O V i»i?/v.
2^.^ 7-
<^^ ."1 '-C
\ . •T-.&
: , J
^ 0
3v 3£
, ; o D
. <2 *\ °\
3 v ^-$^
\ 5 O ff)
KtO P^ £ C Ijp
to o £> r -e «./ ^>
$-0
^o^-^.-p^-3\ _
- c,
Salinity set to 0
Interval set to 2
Output set to 1
v
v
I . J l
F-14
-------
Deployment Checklist
F-15
-------
Glider
Date
Where
Laptop
vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerup!)
In Water
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
indium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status.mi
zero_ocean_pressure
get m_battery
3 20 9et ni_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
look for connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
reports boot application
(mission completed normally?
whiie glider in water
CD
Od.mi (with or without float, ask RU) \s [glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
send *.dbd *.rnlg *.sbd
run shallow, mi
or deep.mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
s^ ["send *.sbd" is most important
(this applies moreso to when handed off to iridium)
yr [(glider should dive and not reappear) (report to Rutgers or steam out slowly once it dives)
Perform CTD Comparison CAST [typically done with RU provided SBE19 or Cast Away CTD
LAT: LON
_
-------
Recovery Checklist
F-17
-------
?u?&
Pilots (TOO
Date 8 2Q r
Where
Laptop
Recovery
get Lat/Lon from email or shore
support
if \ ~*f\ 51S7 ggg
^_
obtain freewave comms
obtain lat/lon with where command
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
(note instrument type!) 0
F-18
-------
Post-Deployment Checklist
F-19
-------
RUTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Slocum Glider Check-IN
DATE:
GLIDER:
Vehicle P owered
1. Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
2. Wiggle vehicle for 5 minutes.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
Nose cone
1. Remove nose cone /
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and \/
remove altimeter or leave
temporarily attached
3. Retract pump V
4, Remove altimeter and hose v
diaphragm removing all sand,
sediment, bio oils ,
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter v
Tail cone
1. Remove tail cone ^
2. Hose and clean anode and air J
bladder making sure air bladder is
completely clean
3. Clean cowling •/
Wing rails
1. Remove wing rails and hose down ^/
Tail plug cleaning
1. Dip red plug in alcohol and clean >/
plug if especially dirty
2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly //,
DO NOT DELETE DATA OFF CARDS
3. Change permissions on folder to read, write, execute for owner and group, and read,
execute for everyone
4. Remove used batteries and place in return crate
5. Re-assemble glider with a vacuum ^/
on
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode, Seabird
Slocum Payload CTD, YSI
Castaway CTD, and
Seabird 19 CTD
F-21
-------
ATA
MUM
a xylem brand
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622, Dec 2005
Sensing Foil Batch No:
Certificate No:
5009
5014W 1504 II29
Product: 5014
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23,2012
This is to certify that this product has been calibrated using the Mowing instruments
Fluke CHUB E-4
Fluke 5615 PRT
Fluke 561 SPRT
Honeywell PPT
Calibration Baft model FNT 321-1-40
Serial No. A7C677
Serial No. 849155
Serial No. 802054
Serial No. 44074
1
Parameter: Internal Temperature:
Calibration points and readings:
T?mpejmtoreJ%j)
Reading (SV)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Giving these coetPdenta
fade*
ItaopCdef
0
2.37279E+01
1
-3.0595 1E-02
2
2.83023&06
3
-4.19785E-09
•Note: Temperature calibration NOT performed
Parameter; Oxygen:
Range:
Acouncy":
Rwdutton:
SettllnFfIline(63%):
OlCSSSmmaa
0-500 jiM15
< ±8pM or ±5%( whichever is greater)
-------
a xylem brand
Sensing FoU Batch No: 5009
Certificate No: 3853500940217
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 62I.Dec 2005
Product: O2 Sensing Ftail PSl3 3853
Calibration Date; 8 February 2)10
Calibration points and phase readings (degrees)
lemperauue i tj
Prosore
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No, 622. Dec 2005
a xylem brand
Sensing FoM Batch No: 5009
Certificate Nos 5014W 1504 1129
Product: 5014
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23, 2012
Data from Cod Down Test:
Cool Down Test
Sample No,
Max Error ~ 2.166
- sn 1504 Temperature
SR10 Scaling Coefficients:
At the SR10 output the Oxygen Optode 3830 can give either absolute oxygen concentration in pM or air saturation in
%. The setting of the internal property "Output"3), controls the selection of the unit. The coefficients for coo verting
SR10 raw data to engineering units are fixed.
ftfiDat--l
A = 0
B = 4.883&01
C = 0
D=0
Oxygen (uM) = A + BN + CN2 + DNS
OatpotB-2
A = 0
B = 1.465E-01
C=0
D = 0
Oxygen (%) = A + BN + CN2 + DN3
3> The default output setting is set to -I
Date:
March 23,2012
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Calibration Engineer
Aaaderu Data mnnmeMs. be.
lUEut Street. Sake B Atdeboro, MA 02703 Td+1 (509)226-9300 esaft fafotJSA@z$tenfac,co
F-24
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERJAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: 11-Dec-11
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = -8.4430706-005
al = 3.0695316-004
a2 i -4.6559746-006
33 - 2.0448006-007
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0001
18.5002
24.0000
29.0000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
581271.2
496277.6
315060.0
272494.8
218238.0
179458.2
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5001
15.0001
18.5001
24.0002
28.9999
_12_-J1QOQ
Temperature ITS-90 - l/{aO + al[//j(n)] + a2[//»2(n)] + a3[/«J(n)]} - 273.15 (8C)
Residual - instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
O
tn
0 0.00
15
3
S
ac
-0.01
-0.02
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
-0.0000
0.0001
-0.0000
-0.0001
0.0002
-0 .0001
O^OOOQ
J I i 1-
5 C
-• »
Mil
1 £
i i i i
» 1
i • • i
i i i i
0 1
» ••
LLl 1
5 2
•
i i i i
0 2
— •-
i i i i
5 3
— • —
III!
0 3!
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
I! 11-D6C-11 -0.00
Temperature, Degrees C
F-25
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERJAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: I I-Dec-11
COEFFICIENTS:
g = -9.7162546-001
h = 1.434026e-001
i = -4.364055e-004
j = 5.2873906-005
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
15.0001
18.5002
24 . 0000
25^0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.8264
34.8059
34.7625
34.7533
34.7433
34^7373
34.7337
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.97675
3.28384
4.26572
4.61093
5.16897
5 .69083
6.06321
INST FREO
(Hz)
2610.07
5262.53
5462.88
6058.32
6253.91
6557.40
682.8 _65
7015.57
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.97673
3.28385
4.26572
4.61094
5.16896
5 J63Q&3
6.06322
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,I5,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.57006-008
CTcor = 3.25006-006
WBOTC = 2.55406-007
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00001
0.00001
-0.00000
0.00000
-0.00001
-0-.OJQ.OQ1
0.00001
f = INST FREQ * sqrt(I.O + WBOTC * t) /1000.0
Conductivity - (g + hf2 + if3 + jf *) / (1 + 5t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressurefdecibars]; 5 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
0.001-
£
w
75 0.000-
;o
-0.001
l'ii
i i i i
till
I I I f
i i i i
lit!
i i i i
Date, Slope Correction
11-Dec-11 1.0000000
2345
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
F-26
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0103
CALIBRATION DATE: 09-Dec-l 1
COEFFICIENTS:
PAD = 1.808852e-001
PA.1 = 4 .7951186-003
PA2 =« -2.529450e-011
PTEMPAO « -7.404472e+001
PTEMPA1 - 4.7582296-002
PTEMPA2 = -1.4589576-007
PRESSURE SPAN CALIBRATION
PRESSURE [NST THERMISTOR
PSIA OUTPUT OUTPUT
14.75 528113.0 2035.0
315.06 590761.0 2036.0
615.08 653406.0 2036.0
915. 06 7160^4-^0 2O37-re
1215.11 77B833-0 2037.0
1465.09 831126.0 2037.0
1215.07 778837.0 2036.0
915.03 716102.0 2037.0
615.03 653412.0 2036.0
315.03 590766.0 2036.0
14.75 528101.0 2035.0
y = thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPA1 * y + PTEMPA2 * y
SLOCUM PAYLOAD CTD
PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
1450 psiaS/N 3459007
PTCAO =
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 -
PTCBO -
PTCB1 =
PTCB2 =
5.2502726-1-005
5.270342e-002
7.4331016-002
2.538938e-t-001
2 . 7500006-004
0. OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14.79
315.02
615.03
1215.11
1465.06
1215.13
915. 08
615.05
315.04
14.74
ERROR
%FSR
0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
-0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.00
TEMP THERMISTOR INST
ITS90 OUTPUT
32.50 2255
29.00 2180
24.00 2074
15.00 1882
4,50 1659
1.00 1585
TEMP (ITS90)
-5.00
35,00
OUTPUT
528186.
528173.
528155.
528122.
528110.
528109.
SPAN(mV)
25.39
25.40
00
80
80
60
00
00
x = pressure output - PTCAO - PTC AI * t - PTCA2 * t
n = x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB! * t + PTCB2 * t2)
pressure (psta) = PAO + PA 1 * n + PA2 * n2
0.50
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
1 ]«|09-Deo-11 -0.00
Pressure (PSIA)
F-27
-------
SonTFek
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101493
0.26
5/30/2012
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
0.2094
/ PASS
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: dshumway
Date: 6/1/2012
F-28
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Beltevue, Washington 98006 USA
Phone: (426) 643-9866 Fax: (426) 643-9964 www.seablrd.com
Customer Information:
Company '~ Rutgers
[DatsT]' 6/14/2012
Contact [DavidAragon
PO^Number J [S16M728
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation,
Problems Found:
J
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Page 1 of 2
F-29
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-8866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seablrd.com
Customer Information:
Company ] Rutgers
[Contact llDavldAragon
[Data 6/14/2012
PO Number S1665726
Serial Ni
J
Ni
Servicea Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2. Perform Routine Calibration Service.
|
Problems Found:
1. The Y-cable had some corrosion damage on pins and had previously been repaired by customer. Win be
replaced with PN 17709 Y-cable.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
Installed NEW pump / data Y-cable.
Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, June 14,2012
Page 2 of 2
F-30
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: {+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 17-May-12
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
g = 4.20453005e-003
h = 5.977124516-004
i = 5.150779966-006
j = -1.526788006-006
fO - 1000.0
SBE19 TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
IPTS-68 COEFFICIENTS
a = 3 .647634976-003
b - 5.84092998e-004
c = 9.487757786-006
d = -1.526277976-006
fO - 2563.761
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
0. 9999
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24. 0000
29.0000
•y.ra cnAA ....—. —
INSTRUMENT FREO
(Hz)
2563.761
2774.062
3478.313
3738.690
4175.001
4601.563
AOt-*> — g"» A
INST TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4997
15.0000
18.5002
23.9997
29.0000
*9 tt/VfM
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.00010
-0.00018
0.00004
0 .00024
-0.00026
-0.00002
cifinm
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{g + h[to(fo/f)] + i[/n0/0] +j[/«3(yO]} - 273.15 (°C)
Temperature IPTS-68 = I/{a + b[/n(f0/f)] + c[ln\fQ/f)] + d[ln\fQ/f)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Following the recommendation of JPOTS: T6g is assumed to be 1.00024 * T^ (-2 to 35 °C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
Date, Offset(mdeg C)
0.02
0.01
U
Q. 0.00-
i
a
1
-0.01
-0.02-
i i
j i
10-May-11
17-May-12
1.56
0.00
-5
10 15 20
Temperature, Degrees C
F-31
25
30
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.cofn
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer: Rutgers
Job'Number: || 69172
Model Number: 1 1 SBE 19-03
(pate of Report: ||
(Serial Number: ||
5/21/2012
199618-1645
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift. If
the calibration identifies a problem, then a second calibration Is performed after work is completed. The 'as received'
calibration Is not performed If the sensor Is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'offset'allows a small correction for
drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a repair apply only to
subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
v Performed
Not Performed
Date: [5/17/2012 |
Comments:
Drift since last cal: -0.00153 | Degrees Celsius/year
'CALIBRATION AFTER REPAIR'
Date: | |
Comments;
Performed
Drift since Last cal:
' Not Performed
J Degrees Celsius/year
F-32
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: I7-May-12
GHIJ COEFFICIENTS
g «> -4.047945536+000
h - 4.828415066-001
i - J..24162353C-003
j - -3.13086509C-005
CPcor a -9.5700e-008 (nominal)
CTcor
3.2500e-006 (nominal)
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
0.9999
4,4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.000D
29.0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
35.0146
34.9937
34.9505
34.9406
:Tl . 9285'
34.9182
34.9078
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99128
3.29980
4.28633
4.63307
5.19347
5.71712
6.09014
INSTFREO
(kHz)
2.88554
B. 31658
8.68395
9.76514
10.11731
10.66172"
11.14627
11.47892
INSTCOND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99124
3.29982
4.28642
4.63307
5.r934~0
5.71707
6.09020
SBEI9 CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Seimens/meter
ABCDM COEFFICIENTS
a = 5.105886646-002
b = 4.27666673e-001
C = -4.031661396+000
d = -1,196434646-004
m - 2.1
CPcor - -9.57006-008 (nominal)
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00005
0.00002
0.00009
-0.00001
-O.OCTOO
-0.00005
0.00006
Conductivity * (g +• hf2 + if3 + jf4) /10(1 + 8t + ep) Siemens/meter
Conductivity = (afm + bf2 + c + dt) / [10 (1 +ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[eC)]; p - pressurefdecibarsj; 5 = CTcor, e = CPcor,
Residual = (instrument conductivity - bath conductivity) using g, h, i, j coefficients
Date, Slope Correction
0.001
I
0.000
-0.001
Jill
i i i i
^ ^
^
A —
i i i
-*^*
i i i i
i i i i
i i
) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
F-33
i i
-
• 10-May-11 0.9998533
"A 17-May-1 2 1.0000000
r , .,_ — --
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643*9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seablrd.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer:
(Rutgers
Job Number:
69172 |
Model Number:
SBE 19-03 |
(Date of Report: ][
(Serial Number: ||
I
5/21/2012 |
199618-1645 |
Conductivity sensors are normally calibrated 'as received1, without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration Is
performed after work Is completed. The'as received' calibration Is not performed If the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request
An'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'slope' allows small
corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a
repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Performed
Not Performed
Date:
5/17/2012|
Drift since last cal: | -0.00040 |PSU/montfa*
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER CLEANING & REPLATINIZING' Performed
Date: | | Drift since Last cal:
Comments:
Not Performed
] PSU/month*
* Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replalinliing tend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift In
post-deaning-calibratlon indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit.
F-34
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone; {+1} 425-643-9866 Fax (+1)425-643-9964 Email: seabird@seabtrd.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 22-May-12
QUADRATIC COEFFICIENTS:
PAD - 7.374722e+001
PA1 = -1.962260e-002
PA2 = 7.626656e-008
SEE 19 PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
150 psia S/N 169585 TCV: -105
STRAIGHT LINE FIT:
M = -1.964407e-QQ2
B = 7.4165006+001
PRESSURE
PSIA
14.57
29.80
59.69
94.83
124.81
149.79
124.82
94.85
bS.ffj
29.86
14.58
DNST
OUTPUT(N)
3050.0
2265.0
728.0
-1068.0
-2578.0
-3812.0
-2584.0
-1078.0
~ '11.0
2255.0
3047.0
COMPUTED
PSIA
14.61
29.69
59.50
94.79
124.84
149.66
124.96
94.99
'5"9T83
29.89
14.67
ERROR
%FS
0.02
-0.07
-0.13
-0.03
0.02
-0.09
0.09
0.10
0.0
0.02
0.06
LINEAR
PSIA
14.25
29.67
59.86
95.14
124.81
149.05
124.93
95.34
bOTZTT
29.87
14.31
Straight Line Fit:
Pressure (psia) =M*N + B(N = binary output)
Quadratic Fit:
pressure (psia} - PAO + PA1 • N + PA2 * N2
Residual = (instrument pressure - true pressure) * 100 / Full Scale Range
ERROR
%FS
-0.21
-0.09
0.12
0.21
0.00
-0.49
0.07
0.33
OT24
0.01
-0.18
If.QU
0.25
IP
i
i
1
i
* n fin
-0.25
i i i i
**-—
0 25 a
"" *-"~"1
—*^
1 L L i
D 7
Press
^-~~
^-^-
\ \ \ \
_ <
^- "
I I !
X
"S
til
I
5 100 125 150
sure (PSIA)
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
rjT\ 22-May-12 0.00
F-35
-------
Appendix G
Deployment 6
9/13/2012 -10/04/2012
G-1
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
G-2
-------
GLIDER
PRIPARER
PREP DATE
LOCATION
*hll1 i3 3) BDfLT. -V37
JU5D£P: V?0>^l ^S 4) BB3 "335"
/ J u
PRE-SEAL l^f*a' ^ '*"
FORE CHECK
Check p
(grease
Grounde
ump & pitch threaded rod ^ Leak detect in place, batteries
& clean if necessary) ./"I secure, white guides free, no
d Nose? S metal shavings, bottles installed ^
PAYLOAD CHECK
Special Sensors / Additional Sensors C I D cable clear, no leak at UTD
1) V tKCo 1 1 2. 1 77Q /^ o$7_S joint, no leak at pucks
2) ' .
Grounded Parts: Fore Sci Ring is" CTD (-J
Aft Sci Ring '^ Other? —
Science Bay Weight Configuration
AFT CHECK
i
(
Indium Card Installed (SIM #) (if not standard)
Flash Card: old data removed?
inspect strain on connectors,,, ,_
(worn ajnnectors^rbatten/V'^ -
secured, ballast boRRfpresent, aft
cap clean/clear of leak
Aft cap grounded?
Battery check
Aft Pack-J13 Voltage
Pitch Pack-J13 Voltage "
Nose Packs - J13 Voltage"
Aft Emer - J31 Voltage
POST-SEAL
| GENERAL
Pick Point Present?
HARDWARE
Special Instruments?
»/
put c_alt_time 0, verify alt chirp
Anode grounded?
Pressure Sensor Check (corrosion/clear)
Aft sensor ^
Payload-sensor
Nose Cone and pump bladder
inspection
Anode size / remainder (est)
'Ejection weight assembly OK and
unseized?
POWERED
Verify Arg,os-ping
5 minutes
I OUTSIDE |
Stabilized m_battery /5* 2-£
m^vacuum @ T @ ballast C10
Compass Check (reading @ compass) GPS check
jt] -^ (lat) Ht
2)
Indium connect -
(Ion)
Alt
3)
4)
logging on; rotate slowly 360,
logging off, plot data: 360 test
zero_ocean_pressure, get m_pressure
0/^
let air bladder inflate, doesjl-ehut off?
G-3
-------
SOFTWARE
GEIMEJtAL
Version
Date OK?
delete old logs
Re-burn latest software image
'configure TBDIist
"NBDIist
\CONFIQ
simul.sim deleted
I \MAFILES
j AUTOEXECHtfF
gotpllO.ma (set x_last_...)
Irid Main: 88160000592
IridAlt: 15085482446
u_iridium_failover_retries =10
Reset the glider, observe any errors
del ..\state\cache\*.*
after *bdlist.dat are set (exit reset):
logging on; logging off
send ..\state\cache\*.cac
send*.mbd*.sbd*.tbd
c_ctd41cp_num_fields_to_send 4
Calibration coefficients
T_ballast_pumped_deadz_width = 30?
"get f_max_working_depth (102 m)"
* Software Burning Tips : if using Procomm or local folder, copy all the files from the
software image locally. Then proceed to edit them for the glider and do a mass
freewave transfer of the files. Save these files or prepare the to-glider with these files
SCIENCE
SENSOR RETURN \
put c_science_send_all 1
put c_science_all_on 8
put c_science_on 3
All sensors reporting values?
CTD
Tank static comparison OK?
[ OPTODE 1
Check in completed?
G-4
-------
9/KW2012
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
SB
11-2-
TAMK!T =
(SB19) C= U .
. L£g
AFT
TANK: T =
{Glider) C =
NOTES , . \\ " -v(yt>S
ITERATION
TANK;!
(SB19) C =
SB
AFT
TANK: Jj
(Glider) Cj
NOTES
ITERATION
TANKiT
(SB19) C =
SB
AFT
TANK: T =
(Glider) C =
NOTES
2012_09_07 r\j07 NJDEP #4.xls
G-5
Ballast Itetations
-------
n
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider BallasBft6SSflfl>12_09_07 ruGOMMJEMCSs
Deployment
NJDEP#4
Glider
ru07
Date
9/10/2012
P re pa re r
Dave A
Air temp
20
f\M ^fAiJio*, wiHf
o
Q
1
a
11
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1,2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
8137.6
4648.1
6315
4258.6
1180.2
20.4
7811.9
438.9
7660.8
9387.7
1450.1
389.1
124.7
119.5
w/o optode
w/o VMT but w/mount
DNC
DNC
DNC
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1.0182
22,92
180.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0223
20.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
50976.357
NA
#VALUE!
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
10
-10
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) A
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H -distance
0
-0.2
0.2
325
292
107
6.4
(deg)
0.0
-11.5
11.5
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 1 86.99
Adjust by: (g) 6.99
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) LVALUE!
Adjust Gilder Mass (entered volume) (g) LVALUE!
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (dont
have to weight partsl)
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m9)
WALUE!
#VALUE!
8VALUE1
1022.11
Average Glider Volume
volume 1:
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = #DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air/66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver fw/ mount) 161 mL iiatiaa*e§hjeisfci4<)
-------
9/7/2012
Ballast Iterations
BALLAST ITERATIONS
GLIDER:
DATE:
ITERATION
SB
Ballast Bottles
FORE1
FORE 2
AFT
NOTES
.0*3
TANK;T
(SB19) C=
TANK; T=
•
(Glider) C= 4- .
ITERATION
TANK;T =
ITERATION
TANKiT =
(SB 19) C =
D =
SB
Ballast Bottles
FORE1
FORE 2
AFT
NOTES
-ISO
f
•/og
TANK: T=
(SB19) C =
(Glider)
c= *-\
, 3^C
SB
Ballast Bottles
FORE 1
FORE 2
AFT
NOTES
TANK: T =
(Girder) C =
o
Glider Ballasiing Template.xls
G-7
Ballast iterations
-------
c
Q:\coolgroup\Gliders\CheckOutSheets, Ballasting. Labels, Forms, etc\GliderBallasjftftaS/te»12_09_07 ruCQMMEJJTSs
Deployment
Glider
Date
Preoarer
Air temp
20
I
a
<
a
UJ ^
£§
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle)
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY
WINGS
OTHER
AFT BATTERY
PITCH BATTERY
FORE BATTERY 1, 2
AFT BOTTLE
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard)
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port)
OTHER
8137.6
4648.1
6315
4258.6
1180.2
20.4
7811.9
438.9
7660.8
9387.7
1450.1
389.1
124.7
119.5
w/o optode (not accurate)
w/o VMT but w/mount
DNC
DNC
DNC
9
CO
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1.0204
22.29
20.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
1.0213
22.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
50976.357
NA
#VALUE!
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL)
Volume Change (target) (mL)
8
-1
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)) ft
H MOMENT (rad)
Angle of Rotation (before
Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added
Radius of Hull
H-distance
0
-0.2
0.2
325
292
107
6.4
(deg)
0.0
-11.5
11.5
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 35.87
Adjust by: (g) 15.87
* Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) LVALUE!
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume) (g) LVALUE!
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Glider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
#VALUE!
ffVALUE!
ffVALUEl
1020.94
Average Glider Volume
volume 1 :
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = 3DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air / 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL lia^a^i^hes^a}
-------
g:\coojgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etc\Glider IWt88i^07\2012_09JtEOMMENJEB #4.xls
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle) 8137.6
FORE HULL 4648.1
AFT STEM (red plug, card) 6315
AFT HULL 4258.6
COWLING 1180.2
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery) 20.4
PAYLOADBAY 7811.9
WINGS 438.9
OTHER
AFT BATTERY 7660.8
PITCH BATTERY 9387.7
FORE BATTERY 1,2 1450.1
AFT BOTTLE 389.1
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard) 124.7
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port) 119.5
OTHER
w/o optode (not accurate)
w/o VMT but w/mount
DNC
DNC
DNC
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1.0204
Tank Temperature (C) 22.29
Weight in Tank (g) 64.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1.0213
Target Temperature © 22.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (ml)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) 1.0190
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (mL) 8
Volume Change (target) (mL) -1
(note use 53.5 E -6 In above for DE (carbon)) A
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
H MOMENT (rad)
50976.357 Angle of Rotation (before)
51942.6 Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation 0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added 290
Radius of Hull 107
H-distance #DIV/Ol
0.0
0.0
0.0
50976.4
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 35.87
Adjust by: {g} -28.13
A Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts!)
Adjust Glider Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -28.24
Adjust Glider Mass (entered volume} (g) 116.19
Glide
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
lider Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (In target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m*)
Average Glider Volume
volume 1:
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = #DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air / 66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
148 g wggrttesfcSfeeet (2)
50834.941
1021.8
1019.0
1021.80
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL
-------
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etcVGIider Ba!lasm$8S7f§^12_09_07 ruQOMNEMTSs
Deployment
Air temp
20
o
I
ft.
•M
I
E
II
•M
o
FORE STEM (altimeter bottle) 8137.6
FORE HULL 4648.1
AFT STEM (red plug, card) 6315
AFT HULL 4258.6
COWLING 1180.2
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery) 20.4
PAYLOADBAY 7811.9
WINGS 438.9
OTHER
AFT BATTERY 7660.8
PITCH BATTERY 9387.7
FORE BATTERY 1,2 1450.1
AFT BOTTLE 389.1
FORE BOTTLE 1 (starboard) 124.7
FORE BOTTLE 2 (port) 119.5
OTHER
w/o optode (not accurate)
w/o VMT but w/mount
DNC
DNC
DNC
Tank Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL) 1.0204
Tank Temperature (C) 22.29
Weight in Tank (g) 186.00
Target Specifics
Target Density (g/mL) 1,0213
Target Temperature © 22.00
Glider Specifics
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL) 1.0190
Volume Change (temperature induced)
Volume Change (tank) (ml) 8
Volume Change (target) (mL) -1
(note use 53.5 E -6 in above for DE (carbon)}A
(note use 70 E -6 in above for Aluminum hull)
H MOMENT (rad)
50976.357 Angle of Rotation (before)
51942,6 Angle of Rotation (after)
Angle of Rotation 0
Weight on Spring (after)
Weight added 290
Radius of Hull 107
H-distance #DIV/0!
(deg)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Should Hang (in tank) (g) 35.87
Adjust by: (g) -150.13
* Ballasting Alternative (known VOLUME) (don't
have to weight parts I)
Adjust Gilder Mass (Dunk Volume) (g) -150.32
Adjust Gl ider Mass (entered volume) (g) 116.19
Calculated Glider Volume (calculated from scales) (mL)
Gilder Density 2 (in target water, using calculated volume above) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 3 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
Glider Density 4 (in target water, using entered volume) (kg / m3)
50715.395
1024.2
1019.0
1024.20
Average Glider Volume
volume 1:
volume 2:
volume 3:
average = #DIV/0!
MISC Items Masses/Volumes
PICK POINT VOLUME 40.4 mL 107 g air/66 g Water
G1 Volume 50.9 L
VMT35 Transceiver (w/ mount) 161 mL 148
-------
o
O:\coolgroup\Gliders\Check Out Sheets, Ballasting, Labels, Forms, etcVGIider
08_24 ru07
Deployment
N IDFP
Glider
Rl J07
Date
R 'in 19
Prepare/
Tina
Air Temperature
20
OL
UI
Q
i
Q
3
<
V)
E
£
s
58
*8
FORE STEM
FORE HULL
AFT STEM (red plug, card)
AFT HULL
COWLING
SCREWS (vacuum, cowling, aft battery)
PAYLOAD BAY{n ^
^c?.-V
nn ui/t har fi"?^n Q vA/ith x«/f Kar 71 7O Q ~? / "7^-7 '"^ - ' ""
T"3^^ port 275.8 star 276.9 '\ "7T1 L1 (^
X
on payload / \}^~
no pickpoint <(5 DO ftQ
f~J / / ff\ £**"
tf-z, yy r>
0 -~>f /
/ ~<5 • &
I2^,r^
33^ J
/ "2-V 7
/ /^? £^"
Tank Specifics Glider Specifics
Tank Density (g/mL)
Tank Temperature (C)
Weight in Tank (g)
1.0221
18.43
Glider Volume (mL)
Total Mass (g)
9. "00 Glider Density 1 (air) (g/mL)
50900
52000
1.0216
Target Specifics \ /m j^ Volume Change (temperature induced)
Target Density (g/mL)
Target Temperature ©
,&ftsxr
-
-------
Pre-Deployment Check Out
For
Aanderaa Oxygen Optode
G-12
-------
RJJTGERS
Coastal Ocean
Observation Lab
Siocum Glider Aanderaa Optode Check IN/OUT
2 Point Calibration & Calibration Coefficient Record
OPTODE MODEL, SN:
1504
IN / OUT
IN
Calibration Record
CALIBRATION DATE: 3/23/2012
Previous:
PERFORMED BY:
Current:
Amanda
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICOef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
C3Coef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
COCoef 4.5E+03 -1.6E+02 3.3E+00 -2.8E-02
CICoef -2.5E+02 8.0E+00 -1.6E-01 1.3E-03
CZCoef 5.7E+00 -1.6E-01 3.1E-03 -2.5E-05
CSCoef -6.0E-02 1.5E-03 -2.8E-05 2.2E-07
C4Coef 2.4E-04 -5.3E-06 l.OE-07 -7.1E-10
Delta:
0.0
2 point Calibration
0% Point
Solution: 15.2 g/ 1500 ml
Castaway
25.89
1002.709
Sample Bottle C
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Results:
OPTODE: 71.02
0.07
25.98
0.21 Cone
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (uM)
0.08 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 0
(0,0,0)(0-2uM)
0
{worst case @ 2 \iM = .04 %
DELTAS:
0.21 Cone A
-0.09 Temp A
Concentration (uM)
(Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
or 0% )
0.08 %A
25.935 Temp avg
100% Point
Solution: NA
Castaway
10.54
1002.709
Sample A, Sample B
LaMotte 7414 - Azide mod
Results:
OPTODE: 33.78
96.21
10.47
335.3 Cone
Na2S03
Cross reference
Temperature
Air Pressure (hPa)
Winkler Label
Winkler Source
Dphase
% Saturation
Temperature
(calculated) (uM)
97. 16 % Saturation (calculated)
WINKLER: 325
(10.2,10.6)
94.02
DELTAS:
10.3 Cone A
0.07 Temp A
Concentration
(Titrations) (ppm)
% Saturation
3.14 %A
10.505 Temp avg
In-Air Saturation Check
SATURATION: 95.62
@TEMP
17.55
<§> PRESS
1002.709
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
G-13
9/6/2012 11:36 AM
-------
Sodium Thiosulate Normalization
Normalization (ml)
(2.0 ±.1) (EPA Compliance)
Paste confiQ report all from optode
Protect
PhaseCoef
TempCoef
FoiINo
COCoef
CICoef
C2Coef
CSCoef
C4Coef
Salinity
CalAirPhasi
CalAirTemf
CalAirPress
CalZeroPh*
CalZeroTen
Interval
AnCoef
Output
SRIODelay
SoftwareV*
SoftwareBi
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
5014
1504 0
1504 -6.62372
1504 23.7279
1504 5009
1504 4537.931
1504 -250.953
1504 5.664169
1504 -0.05994
1504 0.000244
1504 0
1504 32.99431
1504 10.29875
1504 1026.47
1504 65.21005
1504 24.86774
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
1504
2
0
1
-1
3
24
1.204068 0 0
-0.0306 2.83E-06 -4.2E-09
-162.595 3.29574 -0.02793
8.02322 -0.1584 0.001311
-0.15965 0.003079 -2.5E-05
0.001483 -2.8E-05 2.15E-07
-5.3E-06 1E-07 -7.1E-10
Rutgers COOL Optode Check IN/OUT
G-14
9/6/2012 11:36 AM
-------
Deployment Checklist
G-15
-------
Glider
Date
Pilots t?c^/7<>4 [T>1 Where
Laptop
5ff
Z>5
73
vehicle Powerup: CTRL A C (until you get to prompt)!!!
On boat
(Remember after 10 min
glider will go into mission,
as well as on powerup!)
Battery Voltage
Vacuum Pressure
Iridium Connection
boot app
boot (should report application)
run status, mi
O
In Water
zero_ocean_pressure
get m_battery
•
get m_vacuum, should be > 7 for bladder inflation
it
—»——"nooMor connect dialog & surface dialog, let it dial at prompt
boot app
_ ••
reports boot application
ion completed normally?
Od.mi (with or without float, ask RU)
send *.dbd *.mlg *.sbd
run shallow.mi
or deep, mi
Verify dive; disconnect freewave
Report to Rutgers
[glider should dive and surface, type why? Should say overdepth, if not call
rsend *.sbd" is most important
(this applies moreso to when handed off to indium)
should dive and not reappear) (report to Rutgers or steam out slowly once it dives)
Perform CTD Comparison CAST
LON73
pically done with RU provided SBE19 or Cast Away CTD
-------
Recovery Checklist
G-17
-------
Glider
Pilots
Laptop
Recovery
Date
Where
get Lat/Lon from email or shore | |
support
obtain freewave comms
obtain lat/Jon with where command
x
Perform CTD Comparison CAST V \
LAT: ?<.^\3\ ^ LON: rf\.%\oo t
(note instrument type!)
G-18
-------
Post-Deployment Checklist
G-19
-------
RJJTGERS
Slocum Glider Check-fN
Coastal Ocean DATE:
Observation Lab
GLIDER: frJQ-l SB:
Vehicle Powered
1. Power on vehicle in order to fully retract pump, and/or to deflate air bladder.
2, Wiggle vehicle for 5 minutes.
Vehicle Cleaning (hose down with pressure)
_, v 3. Clean cowling
Nose cone
SVTGOA^OVN 1 Remove nose cone Wing rails
2. Loosen altimeter screws, and L Remove wing rails and hose down
remove altimeter or leave
temporarily attached — ..
3. Retract pump
4. Remove altimeter and hose !• Dip red plug in alcohol and clean
diaphragm removing all sand, plug if especially dirty
sediment, bio oils 2. Re-dip red plug and repeatedly
5. Clean nose cone and altimeter insert and remove to clean the
glider plug
Tail cone •*' Compress air glider female
connector
1. Remove tail cone 4 Lightly silicon red plug and
2. Hose and clean anode and air replace in glider once silicon has
bladder making sure air bladder is been dispersed evenly in the plugs
completely clean
CTD Comparison Check
1. Inspect CTD sensor for any sediment buildup, take pictures of anything suspicious or make note.
Static Tank Test
SBEI9 Glider (SBE4ICP or pumped unit)
Temperature: 2.C? > H V \& Temperature: ~? c-> , *-/ IS"
Conductivity: H UW ~L- Conductivity: M Olt>O
CTD Maintenance if comparison is not acceptable (reference SeaBird Application Note 2D)
1. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 1 % Triton X-l 00 solution
2. Perform CTD backward/forward flush with 500 - 1000 ppm bleach solution
3. Perform the same on a pumped unit, just different approach
4. Repeat comparison test if above results not within T < .01 C, C < .005 S/m
SB!9 Glider (SB41CP or pumped unit)
Temperature: Temperature:
Conductivity: Conductivity:
Vehicle Disassembled
\/\./ Check leak points for water or sait buildup
BACKUP FLASH CARDS in /cooIgroup/g!iderData/gUder_OS_backups///,
~
L/
y-
\O.
/ DO NOT DELETE DATA OFF CARDS
^3. Change permissions on folder to read, write, execute for owner and group, and read,
.. execute for everyone
v4. Remove used batteries and place in return crate
Re-assemble glider with a vacuum
G-20
-------
Manufacturer
Calibration
Documentation
Aanderaa Optode, Seabird
41 CP CTD, Seabird 19
CTD, Wetlabs ECO-pucks,
YSI Castaway CTD
G-21
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Bellsvue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (426) 6434866 Fax: (42S) 6434964 wwwA0abiid.com
Service I
Customer Information:
Company
Contact Beth Rizzo
PO Number TWR5740
WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
Date
1A12/2012
Serial Number
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2, Perform Routine Calibration Service,
Problems Found:
1. The anti-fauJant devices appeared "dirty",
2, Conductivity cell was found to have been cracked.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed 'Post Cruise" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Replaced the conductivity ceil.
4. Performed "Final" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
5. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
6. Installed NEWAF24173 AntMbularrt cylinders).
7. Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, January 12,2012
Page 2 of 2
G-22
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Si Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.SMbird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer. ||WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
[Job Number; {[ 66958 | [Date of Report; || 12/28/2011 \
Model Number:[[ WEBB Glider | [Serial Number; || WEBB Gllder-0080
Temperature sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift. If
the calibration Identifies a problem, then a second calibration Is performed after work Is completed. The 'as received'
calibration is not performed If the sensor is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration tetter represents the sensor condition
during deployment In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'offset' allows a small correction for
drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a repair apply only to
subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' y Performed Not Performed
Date: |12/13/20m Drift since last cal: [ 0.0000^] Degrees CeMug^eg
'FINAL CALIBRATION1 v Performed Not Performed
Date: [12/28/2011| Drift since 03 Apr 06 | 0.0000 ] Degrees Cclaiaafreaf
G-23
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Mievue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 6434866 Fax: (425) 6434954 www4wabird.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer:
Job Number:
[[WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION
|1 66958
Model Number:
|| WEBB Glider
Date of Report: ||
Serial Number: jj
12/28/2011
WEBB Glider-0080
Conductivity sensors on normally calibrated 'as received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration Identifies a problem or indicates cell claming to necessary, then a second calibration Is
performed after work Is completed. The 'as received' calibration Is net performed If the sensor Is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request,
An'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient 'slope' allows small
corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a
repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data,
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Performed
Date: [12/13/2011[
Comments:
Drift since last cal:
0.0000
Not Performed
PSU/mootii*
'CALIBRATION AFTER REPAIR'
Date:
JrdTOHEHBu
12/28/2011
Drift Binee Last Cat: |
Not Performed
[PSU/monfli*
The conductivity cell was replaced.
*Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatinliing tend to 'reset'the conductivity sensor to Its original condition. Lack of drift In
post-cleaning-calibration Indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit.
G-24
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Belfevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 28-Deol 1
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO - 7.461652e-005
al - 2.6267786-004
a2 - -1.3590316-006
a3 - 1.3155016-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.5000
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
618337.9
529362.2
338612.3
293537.2
235887.3.
194510.3
170501.6
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.
4
.0001
.4998
15.0002
18.5001
23.9996
29.0002
32.5000
Temperature ITS-90 - l/{aO + al[/n(n)] + a2[ln\n)] + a3[ln\n)\} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.01-
o
o>
Q. o.oo-
"3
'«
&
-0.01-
-0.02-
m
i i i >
5 {
-*-= — *
i i i i
) i
^*.-»— — — —
till
> 1
•\
1111
0 1
K ... ft
| I I I
5 2
T^-^— -^-
1 I I I
0 2
_» ^ i
i i i i
5 3
• — r—
1111
o a
RESIDUAL
GTS-90)
0.0001
-0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
-0.0004
0.0002
-0.0000
Date, Delta T(mdegC)
3-Apr-06 0.11
28-Deo-11 0.00
Temperature, Degrees C
G-25
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 13-Dec-l 1
ITS-90 COEFFICIENTS
aO = 1.611751C-005
al - 2.7631916-004
a2 * -2.4194956-006
a3 - 1.5904006-007
WEBB GLIDER TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
INSTRUMENT
OUTPUT
61S303.2
529347.2
338600.3
293528.2
235875.9
194510.0
170505.0
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
0.9999
4.5000
15.0000
18.4998
24.0001
29.0001
32.4999
Temperature ITS-90 = l/{aO + al[/n(n)] + a2[ln\n)] + a3[ln\n)]} - 273.15 (°C)
Residual = instrument temperature - bath temperature
0.02
0.01
O
S, o.oo
1
3
en
i
-0.01
-0.02
RESIDUAL
(TTS-90)
-0.0001
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
-0.0001
Date, Delta T (mdeg C)
1 1 1 1
-* *
• •!
— — — ™^^^_^-^_
i i i
3
LJ_
1 ~t=
r
1 1 1 1
*•
1 1 1 1
*+•
1 1 1 1
-=*—
1
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature, Degrees C
n.9R
L 1
• 3-Apr-06 -0.64
~£ 13-Dec-11 -0.00
POSTCR r.^.
CAOBRATION
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabirt.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 28-Dec-l 1
COEFFICIENTS:
g * -9.7167056-001
h - 1.5049386-001
i = -4.1276546-004
j = 5.3506626-005
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
CPcor = -9.5700e-008
CTcor = 3,25006-006
WBOTC a -2.61716-007
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.5000
15 . 0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
32.5000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.8719
34. 8512
34. B064
34.7960
34.7843
34.7763
34 .7690
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.98026
3 .28769
4.27053
4.61597
5.17439
5.69650
6.06867
INSTFREO
(Hz)
2546.95
5136.55
5332.10
5913.30
6104.17
6400.38
6665.07
6847.27
INSTCOND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.98027
3 .28769
4.27051
4.61597
5.17440
5.69653
6.06866
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00001
-o.obooi
-0.00002
-0.00000
0.00001
0.00002
-0.00002
f = INST FREQ « sqrt(1.0 + WBOTC * t) /1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) / (I + St + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure[decibars]; 8 = CTcor, e = CPcor;
Residua! = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.002-
0,001
E
CO
I
0.000-
-0.001
-0.002
1 1 1 1
3
i i i i
i i i i
1111
• .' i i
i i i i
123456^
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
HF1 28-Dec-11 1.0000000
CALIBRATION
AFTER
MODIFICATIONS
G-27
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 13-Dec-l 1
COEFFICIENTS:
g - -1.0081996+000
WEBB GLIDER CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Siemens/meter
h = 1.584943e-001
i = -1.616097e-003
CTcor
WBOTC
= 3-25006-006
= -2.61716-007
j = 1.5622226-004
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
1.0000
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
34.5773
34.5570
34.5129
34.5026
34.4905
34.4809
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.95748
3.26265
4.23831
4.58122
5.13549
5.65353
INSTFREO
(Hz)
2547.18
5069.44
5260.77
5829.60
6016.35
6306.04
6564.14
INSTCOND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.95760
3.26256
4.23814
4.58118
5.13585
5.65336
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
0.00013
-0.00009
-0.00017
-0.00004
0.00036
-0.00017
f = INST FREQ * sqrt(1.0 + WBOTC * t) / 1000.0
Conductivity = (g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) / (1 + 5t + ep) Siemens/meter
t = temperature[°C)]; p = pressure[decibars]; 6 = CTcor; e = CPcor;
Residual = instrument conductivity - bath conductivity
Date, Slope Correction
0.036-
0.018
0.000
I
-0.018-
-0.036
1 1 1 1
.— ~— ~
i i i i
^-~~*
i i i i
-*-^
till
III!
i i i i
.
iiit
3123456
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
1 • | 3-Apr-06 0.9965748
m 13-Dec-11 1.0000000
f
POST CR SSL
CALIBRATION
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 0080
CALIBRATION DATE: 12-Deoll
COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = 4.9137206-002
PA1 = 2.4057536-002
PA2 = 2.6428626-009
PTHAO - -7.0960236+001
PTHA1 = 4.9523056-002
PTHA2 = -2.9681016-007
WEBB GLIDER PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
508 psia S/N 9546
PTCAO »
PTCA1 =
PTCA2 =
PTCBO -
PTCB1 -
PTCB2 =
PRESSURE SPAN CALIBRATION
PRESSURE INST THERMISTOR
PSIA OUTPUT OUTPUT
14.
105.
205.
305.
404.
505.
405.
305.
205.
105.
14.
V4
00
01
00
99
00
00
01
03
04
74
600
4352
8505
12656
16802
20944
16803
12657
8507
4353
600
.1
.0
.7
.0
.1
.1
.2
.2
.1
.5
. 0
1886
1887
1891
1890
1891
1890
1891
1891
1890
1892
1893
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.0
.0
COMPUTED
PRESSURE
14
104
204
305
404
504
405
305
205
105
14
.75
.99
.99
.00
.99
.98
.02
.03
.03
.03
.75
ERROR
%FSR
0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
0
0
-0
-0
0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
-1.328415e-t-001
2.7952186-001
-8.6017876-003
2.4958126+001
8.2500006-004
O.OOOOOOe+000
THERMAL CORRECTION
y = thermistor output; t = PTEMPAO + PTEMPA1 * y + PTEMPA2 • y2
x - pressure output - PTCAO - PTCA1 * t- PTCA2 * t2
n = x * PTCBO / (PTCBO + PTCB1 * t + PTCB2 * t2)
pressure (psia) = PAO + PA1 * n + PA2 * n2
TEMP
ITS90
32.50
29.00
24.00
18.50
15.00
4.50
1.00
PRESS
TEMP
2116.
2042.
1940.
1826.
1754.
1537.
1466.
20
80
70
20
40
40
30
TEMPUTS90)
-5
35
.00
.00
INST
OUTPUT
612.24
613.19
614.20
614.38
614.57
613.38
612.58
SPAN(mV)
24.95
24.99
U.3U-
021-
£
u.
Residual,
s c
J C
n c
,3U
1 ] 1 1
1 1 1 1
ULJLI
i i i i
i i i i
i i i i
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
[*|12-Dec-11 0.00
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Pressure (PSIA)
400
450 500 550
G-29
-------
PO Box 618
820 Applegate St,
Philomath. OR 97370
WETCMLabs
Scattering Meter Calibration Sheet
(541) 929-5650
Fax (541) 029-5277
wwwwetlabs.com
1/10/2007
Wavelength: 470
Customer; Rutgers University
S/N#: BB3SLQ-335
Job #: 612002
SO ft 459
Tech: cw
Use the following equation to obtain "seated" output values:
1
1
p(9c) m sr = Scale Factor x (Output - Dark Counts)
* Scale Factor for 470 nm
* Output
* Dark Counts
Instrument Resolution
1.158E-05 (counts)
meter reading (counts)
50 (counts)
0.8847 (counts) 1.02E-05 (m V)
[Jenrmions:
* Scale Factor, Calibration scale factor, 3(8c}/counts. Refer to User's Guide for derivation.
' Output: Measured signal output of the scattering meter.
* Dark Counts: Signal obtained by covering detector with black tape and submersing sensor in water.
Instrument Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
B83SLO-33S.XJ8
Revision P
11/1/06
G-30
-------
PO Box 61 8 L (541)929-5850
Fax(541)92&.8277
Philomath, OR 97370 www.wettebs.com
ma»^/. • _ t^ ^
W 1 1 l^L^B/ LODS
Scattering Meter Calibration Sheet
1/10/2007 Customer: Rutgers University SO #: 459
Wavelength: 532 S/N#: BB3SLQ-335 Job #: 612002 Tech: cw
Use the following equation to obtain "scaled" output values:
p(0c) m1 sr"1 = Scale Factor x (Output - Dark Counts)
• Scale Factor for 532 nm = 7.078E-06 (counts)
* Output = meter reading (counts)
* Dark Counts = 54 (counts)
Instrument Resolution = 0.9654 (counts) 6.83E-06 (m^sf1)
Definitions:
* Scale Factor: Calibration scale factor, p(9c)/count8. Refer to User's Guide for derivation.
* Output: Measured signal output of the scattering meter,
* Dark Counts: Signal obtained by covering detector with black tape and submersing sensor in water.
Instrument Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
BB3SL.O-335.xto Revision P 11/1/06
G-31
-------
Philomath, OR 97370 _ . __—. , ^a^aV . • wmniwetlaJaia.com
WETMLabs
820ApptegateSt. A^ Fax (541) 929-5277
1
Scattering Meter Calibration Sheet
1/10/2007 Customer: Rutgers University SO#:459
Wavelength:660 S/N#: BB3SLQ-335 Job*: 612002 Tech: cw
Use the following equation to obtain "seated* output values: __
P(6c) m"1 sr'1 = Scale Factor x (Output - Dark Counts)
* Scale Factor for 660 nm = 3.521E-Q6 (counts)
• Output = meter reading (counts)
* Dark Counts = 53 (counts)
instrument Resolution 0.7431 (counts) 2.62E-06 (m'1 sr"1)
Definitions:
* Scale Factor: Calibration scale factor, p(9c)/counts. Refer to User's Guide for derivation.
* Output Measured signal output of the scattering meter.
• Dark Counts: Signal obtained by covering detector with black tape and submersing sensor in water.
Instrument Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
BB3$LO-335.xl8 Revision P 11/1/06
G-32
-------
PMtomsffi, OR 87370 _ _ „__,^^^. . . www.wetlabs.oom
WETHLabs
820 Apptegate Si A Fax (541) 92S-5277
1
Scattering Meter Calibration Sheet
1/10/2007 Customer: Rutgers University SO ft 459
Wavelength: 680 S/N#: BBFL2SLO-337 Job f: 612002 Tech: cw
Use the following equation to obtain "scaled" output values:
P(0e) m"1 sr"1 = Scale Factor x (Output - Dark Counts)
• Scale Factor for 880 nm = 2.369E-06 (counts)
» Output = meter reading (counts)
* Dark Counts = 49 (counts)
Instrument Resolution = Q.7955 (counts) 1.88E-06 (m'1 sr'1)
Deflnlons:
• Scale Factor. Calibration scale factor, p(0c)/counts. Refer to User's Guide for derivation.
* Output: Measured signal output of tie scattering meter.
* Dark Counts: Signal obtained by covering detector with black tape and submersing sensor in water.
Instrument Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
BBFL2SLO337.xls Revision P 11/1/06
G-33
-------
PO Box 518 ^^^k (541)929-5850
620ApplegateSt. \A/PTf^^^Bf I rtl%Q Fax(541)929-5277
Philomath, OR 97370 W ¥ C I ^^^•M fc%Jfc^*P www.wetlabs com
^H>^
ECO CDOM Fluorometer Characterization Sheet
Date: 1/11/2007 Customer. Rutgers University
Job #: 612002 SO#: 459 S/N;# BBFL2SLO-337
CDOM concentration expressed in ppb can be derived using the equation:
CDOM (ppb) = Scale Factor * (Output - Dark Counts)
Digital
Dark Counts 46 counts
Scale Factor (SF) 0.0874 ppb/count
Maximum Output 4120 counts
Resolution 1.0 counts
Ambient temperature during characterization 19.8 °C
Dark Counts: Signal output of the meter in dean water with black tape over detector.
SF: Determined using the following equation: SF = x * (output - dark counts), where * m the concentration of the
solution used during Instrument characterization. SF Is used to derive Instrument output concentration from the raw
signal output of the ffuorometer.
Maximum Output: Maximum signal output the fluorameter is capable of.
Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
BBFL2SL.O-337.xJs Revision P 11/1/06
G-34
-------
POBOX618 .aaai—*^B^ak • • (541)829-5650
620 Apptogate St. \A/F T i ^a^Bi I d lIC Fax (541} 82d^277
Philomath, OR 97370 W W C I \j^^K i"^«*^^ www.weUabs.com
^S>
EGO Chlorophyll Fluorometer Characterization Sheet
Date: 1/11/2007 Customer. Rutgers University
Job #: 612002 SO #; 459 S/N:# BBFL2SLO-337
Chlorophyll concentration expressed in pg/l can be derived using the equation:
CHL (M9/I) = Scale Factor * (Output - Dark counts)
Digital
Dark counts 50 counts
Scale Factor (SF) 0 0121 pg/l/count
Maximum Output 4120 counts
Resolution 1.0 counts
Ambient temperature during characterization 19.8 °C
Dark Counts: Signal output of trie meter in dean water with black tape over detector.
SF: Determined using the following equation: SF - x * (output - dark counts), where x is the concentration of the
solution used during instrument characterization. SF is used to derive instrument output concentration from the raw
signal output of the fluorometer.
Maximum Output Maximum signal output the fluorometer is capable of.
Resolution: Standard deviation of 1 minute of collected data.
The relationship between fluorescence and chlorophylt-a concentrations tn-ettu to highly variable The scale factor toted on this
document was determined using a raono-cuttam of phytopiankton (Tnalaasloslra waSssflogil) The population was assumed » be
reasonably healthy and the concentration was determined by using the absorption method To accurately determine chlorophyll
concentration using a fluorometec, you must perform secondary measurements on the populations of Interest. This is typically done
using extraction-based measurement techniques on discrete samples. For additional Information on determining chlorophyll
concentration see "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" part 10200 H, published jointly by the American
Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and the Water Environment Federation.
BBFL2SLO-337.xls Revision P 11/1/06
G-35
-------
a xylem brand
DATE: March 8,2012
Prepared by Shawn Sneddon
Service Order 2768
Customer: Rutgers
US SERVICE & CALIBRATION DEPARTMENT
Service Report
Oxygen Optode 5014W sn!504
1. Performed visual inspection
a. OK.
2. Checked for Isolation between housing and electronics
a. Isolation OK,
3. Checked current consumption
a. Operating = 31.3 rnA; OK.
b. Quiescent = 2Q5uA; OK.
4. Performed test in air checking BAmp, BPhase, and RawTemp
a. All OK.
5. Inspected foil visually
a. Looks OK.
6. Checked firmware version
a. 3.24; OK.
7, Checked temperature in 10 deg.C bath with reference
a. Snl504 = 10.28, Reference =10.288; OK.
8. Checked saturation in 100% saturated bath with reference optode
a. Snl504 = 92.34%, sn338 = 100.236%; Needs to be recalibrated.
9. Performed saturation calibration at 100% and 0% saturation
a. PASSED.
10. Checked saturation in 100% saturated bath with reference optode
a. Snl504 = 100.03%, sn338 = 100.433%; OK.
11. Checked saturation in 20 deg.C bath with reference optode
b. Snl504 = 97.40%, sn338 = 98.947%; OK.
12. Performed cool down test from 20 to 1 deg.C
a. PASSED.
13. Returned to customer settings
Next Calibration Date: March 23,2014
Next Service Date: March 23, 2014
Aanderaa Data Instruments. Inc. 1
182 East Street Suite B 508-226-9300 Atfleboro, MA 02703
G-36
-------
TEST ft SPECIFICATIONS
Form No. 620, Nov 2005
a xylem brand
Layout No: Product: SOU
Circuit Diagram No: Serial No: 1504
Program Version:
1. Visual and Mechanical Checks:
1.1. O-ring surface OK
1.2. Soldering quality N/A
1.3. Visual surface OK
1.4. Pressure test (60MPa) N/A
1.5. Galvanic isolation between housing and electronics OK
2. Current Drain and Voltages;
2.1. Average current drain at 0.5Hz sampling (Max: 38mA) 313 taA
2.2. Current drain in steep (Max: 300uA) 205 uA
3. Performance Test In Air, 20°C Temperature:
3.1. Amplitude measurement (Blue: 290 - 470mV) 377.3 mV
3.2. Phase measurement (Blue: 27 ±5°) 30.49°
33 Temperature Measurement (100 ± 300mV) 29.59 mV
4, Firmware:
4.1* Firmware upgrade 3.24
Date: Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
March 23.2012 1
Service and Calibration Engineer
1S2 East Street, SnfreB Aflfebcro, MA 02703 Tel
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622, Dec 2005
a xylem brand
Sensing Foil Batch No:
Certificate No:
5009
50I4W 1504 1129
Product: SOU
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23,2012
This ia to certify that this product has been calibrated using the following instalments:
Fluke CHUB E-4
Fluke 561 5 PRT
Fluke 561 5 PRT
Honeywell PPT
Calibration Bath moddFNT 321 -1-40
S«rial No. A7C677
Serial No. 849155
Serial No. 802054
Serial No. 44074
1
Parameter: Internal Temperature:
Calibration points and readings:
Temperature (°C)
Reading (mV)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Giving these coefficients
Index
TtanpCoef
0
2.37279&f01
1
-3.0595 1E-02
2
2.83023&06
3
-4.19785E-09
•Note: Temperature calibration NOT performed
Parameter: Oxygen:
Range:
Accuracy":
Resolution:
Settling Tlmo (63*):
O2 Concentration
0-500 nM "
< ±8jjM or ±5 %{ whichever is greater)
-------
a xylem brand
Sensing Foil Batch No: 5009
Certificate No: 3853500940217
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 62I.Dec2005
Product: O2 Sensing Foil PSt3 3853
Calibration Date: 8 February 2010
Calibration potote and phase rtadtogs (degrees)
Tsmpenture (°C)
Pressure (bPa)
O2 in * of O2+N2
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
10.00
20.90
30.00
3.97
977.00
73.18
68.01
64.J9
55.80
4^.W
35.09
29.85
10.93
97^.00
72.63
67.02
63.19
54.16
44.4*7
33.38
28.30
20.15
977.00
71.62
65.42
61,20
51.76
41.97
31.14
2830
29.32
977.00
70.72
63.92
59.44
49.56
39.75
29.24
24.64
38.39
977.00
69.77
62.31
5739
47.45
37.69
27.56
23.19
Giving these coefficients "
Index
CO Coefficient
Ct Coeffident
C2 Coefficient
C3Coeffldent
C4 Coefficient
0
4.53793E+03
-2J0953B+02
5.66417E400
-5.99449E-02
2.436I4E-04
1
-1.62595E+02
8.02322E+00
-1.59647E-01
1.48326E-03
-S.267S9E-06
2
3.29574B+00
-1.58398E-01
3.079 IOE-03
-2.82110E-05
1.00064E-07
3
-2.79285E-02
1.31141&03
-2.46265E-05
2.15156E-07
-7.14320E-10
" Ask for Form No 62 IS when this O2 Sensing Foil is tuerf in Oxygen Sensor 3830 with Serial Numbers lower than 184.
Due:
Februarys, 2010
Amtea* Data Inrtramaifr Inc.
182 East Street, Sate B Atdeboro. MA 02703 TeL-H (508) 226-9300 onafl: fafoUSA@3sytemfac.com
G-39
-------
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
Form No. 622, Dec 2005
a xylem brand
Sensing Foil Batch No: 5009
Certificate N« 5014W 1504 1 129
Data from Cool Down Test:
5 T
A .
•I .
Jl -
* 1
s * {
e -2 -
.A -
t .
Cool Down Test
Product: SOU
Serial No: 1504
Calibration Date: March 23, 2012
is
_\.
*^
^~~ ^_
— -___
Sample Na
sn!504 Temperature
. on
a
,5!
1
. 10 S
J
s "
_ n
Max Error- 1166
SR10 Scaling Coefficients:
At the SR10 output the Oxygen Optode 3830 can give either absolute oxygen concentration in \iM or air saturation in
%. The, setting of the internal property "Output"3>, controls the selection of the unit. The coefficients for converting
SRIO raw data to engineering units are fixed.
Output «•-!
A = 0
B-4.883E-01
C = 0
D = 0
Oxygen (uM) « A + BN +CN2 + DN3
Outputs -2
A=0
B=1.465E-01
C=0
D = 0
Oxygwi (%) = A •»• BN + CN2 + DN3
11 The default output setting is set to -i
Date:
March 23,2012
Sign: Shawn A. Sneddon
Service and Catlbratton Enyneer
1S2 But Street, Sato B Adebero, MA 02703 Td. +1 (508) 220-9300
tafoUSA@xyfcmfac.com
G-40
-------
SonTek
^^IH^^^^^^^^V'
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101493
0.26
5/30/2012
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
0.2094
/ PASS
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: dshumway
Date: 6/1/2012
G-41
-------
ISooTek
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^HVi
a xylem brand
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: (858) 546-8327
support@sontek.com
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE
System Info
System Type
Serial Number
Firmware Version
Calibration Date
CastAway-CTD
11D101494
1.50
8/9/2012
Power
Standby Mode (A)
Supply Voltage
0.2463
/ PASS
2.9V
Calibration
Pressure
Conductivity
Temperature
GPS
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Verified by: dshumway
Date: 8/13/2012
G-42
-------
8840 Summers Ridge Road
San DtegoCAUSA92121-3091
Tel:858-®4&8327 Fix: 858*46-81 SO
supportQsontetuiom FEIN: 31-1778604
PLEASE FILL IN THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE, AND THEN
PLACE THIS PAGE INSIDE THE SHIPPING BOX.
Service Request #: 292472
ADDRESS INFORMATION
i a
Ship To: ch*P Haldeman
IMCS Rutgers University
71 Dudley Rd
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
T6|. 848-932-3295
. Purchasing Department
Rutgers, The State University of NJ
ASB III, 3 Rutgers Plaza, 2nd Floor
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8559
E-mail: http : //purchasing . rutgers . edu
INSTRUMENT INFORMATION
Serial Number: 11D101494*
Briefly describe reason for return (If applicable, include events leading to
problem):
Temperature and Conductivity Recalibration ($460)
Pressure Sensor Recalibration ($220)
List contents of shipping box:
This serves as your packing list to us. List each separated Hem (e.g., system, cables,
plugs,...}. We use tills list to ensure we return the correct Items to you.
Castaway CTD in Storm case w/ instructions, 2 styli,
maintenance kit, usb drive w/ software, usb bluetooth adapter,
and small stainless clip
-------
9940 SUMIMIS Rldga Road
SwiDteflO CAUSA 92121-3061
Tel: 858*48-8327 Fee 8584484150
suppwtgtontatccom FEW: 31-1779804
Service Request Instructions
Please follow these Instructions to assure prompt attention to your Instrument
1. Please package the Instrument in the original box in which the instrument was
shipped to you. If It is not possible to use the original box, please package it securely in
a sturdy container with substantial packing to prevent possible damage during shipping.
If the instrument is shipped to SonTek without such precautions, we reserve the right to
refuse the shipment and/or charge for proper packaging upon return to you.
2. Please address the shipping box as follows:
SonTek/Y8l
ATTN:SR# 292472
9940 Summers Ridge Road
San Diego, CA 92121-3091
United States
Tel: -1-1 968-646-8327
3. If the instrument Is being returned from outside the United States, please be sure
to state clearly on all paperwork (commercial invoice and SLI): "U.S. GOODS
RETURNING FOR REPAIR". Please ship all instruments "D.O.P. SAN DIEGO", if
these instructions are not followed, SonTek reserves the right to bl any charges
incurred for duties and taxes to you.
4. SonTek will not accept shipments sent "FREIGHT COLLECT." All returned items
must be shipped freight prepaid unless otherwise authorized.
5. We suggest you remove used battery packs before shipping. If you return an
instrument to us with a used battery pack, and you wish to have the pack replaced, we
must charge an additional $20 U.S. to cover the cost of government-required battery
disposal.
5. Instruments returned outside of the warranty period are subject to an evaluation
fee of $400. Additional charges for parts and labor may be necessary.
6. If your system has an internal recorder, please be sure to download ail flies
before returning the system. We are not responsible for lost data.
7. Please fill in the second page of this form and place it in the returning shipping
box. Keep tills first page for your records.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE
CONTACT US BEFORE RETURNING THE INSTRUMENT.
Page 1 of2
G-44
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St. Beilevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (426) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.saablrd.com
Rwrt I
69172
Customer information:
; Rutgers
IContect j'David Aragon
6/1*2012
urtbtf J S1666726
Serial Number
Modal Number I
Services Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
Problems Found:
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
Special Notes:
Thursday, June 14.2012
Page 1 of 2
G-45
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Beltevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seaWrd.com
I Service
Rwort I
Cuetomer Information:
Company jjRutgere Date [ 6/14/2012
[Contact
PO Number 51665726
modal Number liSBE f8-03
Service* Requested:
1. Evaluate/Repair Instrumentation.
2. Perform Routine Calibration Service.
Problem* Found:
1. The Y-cable had some corrosion damage on pins and had previously been repaired by customer. Will be
replaced with PN 17709 Y-cable.
Services Performed:
1. Performed initial diagnostic evaluation.
2. Performed "Post Cruise" calibration of the temperature & conductivity sensors.
3. Calibrated the pressure sensor.
;, Installed NEW pump/data Y-cabte.
. Performed complete system check and full diagnostic evaluation.
Specie! Notes:
Thursday, June 14, 2012 Page 2 of 2
G-46
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 17-May-t2
tTS-90 COEFFICIENTS
g = 4.204530056-003
h = 5.977124516-004
i m 5.150779966-006
j = -1.52678800e-006
fO - 1000.0
SBE19 TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION DATA
ITS-90 TEMPERATURE SCALE
IPTS-68 COEFFICIENTS
a - 3,647634976-003
b = 5 .840929986-004
C = 9.48775778e-006
d = -1.526277976-006
fO - 2563.761
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
0.9999
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.0000
29.0000
•>a— .C..AAJ"I
INSTRUMENT FREO
(Hz)
2563.761
2774 .062
3478.313
3738.690
4175.001
4601.563
AOJV? C4vt
INSTTEMP
(ITS-90)
1.0000
4.4997
15.0000
18.5002
23.9997
29.0000
**> CW/M — —
RESIDUAL
(ITS-90)
0.00010
-0.00018
0.00004
0.00024
-0.00026
-0.00002
n-- nnnn"j
Temperature iTS-90 = !/{§ + h[/n(f0/f)] + \[ln(fQ/f)] + i[!n\f
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th St Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-9866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Temperature Calibration Report
Customer: ({Rutgers
Job'Number: |] 69172 |
Model Number: 1 1 SBE 19-03 |
[Date of Report: jj
(Serial Number: ||
I
5/21/2012 |
199618-1645 |
Temperature season are normally calibrated 'as received', without adjustments, allowing a determination sensor drift. If
the calibration identifies a problem, then a second calibration is performed after work Is completed. The 'as received'
calibration is not performed If the sensor Is damaged or non-functional, or by customer request.
An 'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing coefficients to convert sensor frequency to temperature. Users
must choose whether the 'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the sensor condition
daring deployment. In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. The coefficient'offset'allows a small correction for
drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a repair apply only to
subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION'
Date: f 5/17/2012 |
v Performed
Drift since last cal: I -0.00153
Not Performed
Degrees Celsius/year
'CALIBRATION AFTER REPAIR'
Date: |
Comments:
Performed
Drift since Last cal:
Not Performed
J Degrees Celsius/year
G-48
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: (+1) 425-643-9866 Fax (+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 17-May-12
SBE19 CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION DATA
PSS 1978: C(35,15,0) = 4.2914 Seimens/meter
GHIJ COEFFICIENTS
g - -4.047945536+000
h = 4.828415066-001
i = .1.241623536-003
j •> -3.130865096-005
CPcor » -9
CTcor = 3
BATH TEMP
(ITS-90)
22.0000
0.9999
4.4999
15.0000
18.5000
24.000D
29.0000
32.5000
.5700e-008
.25006-006
BATH SAL
(PSU)
0.0000
35.0146
34.9937
34.9505
34.9406
3*.92BF~
34.9182
34.9078
(nominal)
(nominal)
BATH COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99128
3.29980
4.28633
4.63307
5.19347
5.71712
6.09014
ABCDM COEFFICIENTS
a = 5.105886646-002
b = 4.276666736-001
c - -4,03166139e+000
d - -1
m = 2
CPcor
INST FREO
(kHz)
2.88554
8.31658
8.68395
9.76514
10.11731
rOT5"6T72~
11.14627
11.47892
.196434646-004
.1
= -9.57006-008 (nominal)
INST COND
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
2.99124
3.29982
4.28642
4.63307
5 . T33 4~0
5.71707
6.09020
RESIDUAL
(Siemens/m)
0.00000
-0.00005
0.00002
0.00009
-0.00001
-0.0000
-0.00005
0.00006
Conductivity »(g + hf2 + if3 + jf4) /10(1 + St + ep) Siemens/meter
Conductivity = (afro + bf2 + c + dt) / [10 (1 +ep) Siemens/meter
t *• temperaturc[°C)]; p - pressure[decibars]; 8 = CTcor, e = CPcor,
Residual = (instrument conductivity - bath conductivity) using g, h, i, j coefficients
Date, Slope Correction
0.002
0.001
E
CO
'*m*r
T5 0.000
•a
|
a>
a
-0.001
-0.002
_J I 1 i
i i i
,
~" i
^
L 1 1 1
,•-•-
~^^,
1 1 1 1
• •
"*~ — *"
1 1 1 1
\
A
I i
) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Conductivity (Siemens/m)
G-49
i i
r» 10-May-11 0.9998533
"A 17-May-1 2 1.0000000
POST CRUISE
CALIBRATION
-------
SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS, INC.
13431 NE 20th Street Bellevue, Washington 98005 USA
Phone: (425) 643-8866 Fax: (425) 643-9954 www.seabird.com
Conductivity Calibration Report
Customer:
Job Number:
[Rutgers
69172 |
I
Date of Report: ||
Model Number: 1 1 SBE 19-03 | {Serial Number: ][
5/21/2012 |
199618-1645 [
Conductivity sensors are normally calibrated 'as received', without cleaning or adjustments, allowing a determination of
sensor drift. If the calibration identifies a problem or Indicates cell cleaning is necessary, then a second calibration Is
performed after work Is completed. The'as received' calibration is not performed if the sensor is damaged or non-
functional, or by customer request
An 'as received' calibration certificate Is provided, listing the coefficients used to convert sensor frequency to
conductivity. Users must choose whether the'as received' calibration or the previous calibration better represents the
sensor condition during deployment In SEASOFT enter the chosen coefficients. Tlte coefficient'slope'allows small
corrections for drift between calibrations (consult the SEASOFT manual). Calibration coefficients obtained after a
repair or cleaning apply only to subsequent data.
'AS RECEIVED CALIBRATION' v Performed Not Performed
Date:
5/17/20121 Drift since last cal: ( -0.00040 [PSUAnontn*
Comments:
'CALIBRATION AFTER CLEANING & REPLAT1NIZING1 Performed ^ Not Performed
Date: | | Drift since Last cal: | __j PSU/month*
Comments:
*Measured at 3.0 S/m
Cell cleaning and electrode replatlnlzing lend to 'reset' the conductivity sensor to its original condition. Lack of drift in
post-cleaning-calibration indicates geometric stability of the cell and electrical stability of the sensor circuit.
G-50
-------
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc.
13431 NE 20th Street, Bellevue, WA 98005-2010 USA
Phone: {+1} 425-643-9866 Fax {+1) 425-643-9954 Email: seabird@seabird.com
SENSOR SERIAL NUMBER: 1645
CALIBRATION DATE: 22-May-12
QUADRATIC COEFFICIENTS:
PAO = 7.3747226+001
PA1 = -1.962260e-002
PA2 = 7.6266566-008
SBE19 PRESSURE CALIBRATION DATA
150 psia S/N 169585 TCV: -105
STRAIGHT LINE FFT:
M = -1.964407e-002
B = 7.4165006-I-001
PRESSURE
PSIA
14 . 57
29.80
59.69
94.83
124.81
149.79
124.82
94.85
b9.ffJ
29.86
14.58
INST
OUTPUTfN)
3050.0
2265.0
728.0
-1068.0
-2578.0
-3812.0
-2584.0
-1078.0
.'1110
2255.0
3047.0
COMPUTED
PSIA
14.61
29.69
59.50
94.79
124.84
149.66
124.96
94.99
59.83
29.89
14.67
ERROR
%FS
0.02
-0.07
-0.13
-0.03
0.02
-0.09
0.09
0.10
CJ.CJ
0.02
0.06
LINEAR
PSIA
14.25
29.67
59.86
95.14
124.81
149.05
124.93
95.34
bll ,,i\i
29.87
14.31
ERROR
%FS
-0.21
-0.09
0.12
0.21
0.00
-0.49
0.07
0.33
0 .24
0.01
-0.18
Straight Line Fit:
Pressure (psia) = M*N + B(N = binary output)
Quadratic Fit:
pressure (psia) - PAO + PA1 * N + PA2 * N2
Residual = (instrument pressure - true pressure) * 100 / Full Scale Range
0.50-
0.25
^ 0.00
-0.25-
i i i
iii i i i
Date, Avg Delta P %FS
C¥1 22-May-12 0.00
25 50 75 100
Pressure (PSIA)
125
150
G-51
------- |