Industrial Waste
Management
-------
This Guide provides state-of-the-art tools and
practices to enable you to tailor hands-on
solutions to the industrial waste management
challenges you face.
WHAT'S AVAILABLE
• Quick reference to multimedia methods for handling and disposing of wastes
from all types of industries
• Answers to your technical questions about siting, design, monitoring, operation.
and closure of waste facilities
• Interactive, educational tools, including air and ground water risk assessment
models, fact sheets, and a facility siting tool.
• Best management practices, from risk assessment and public participation to
waste reduction, pollution prevention, and recycling
-------
;NOWLEDGEMENTS
The rdowing members of the Industrial Waste Focus Group and the Industrial Waste Steering Commiw are grateUy
acknowledged far al of their time and assistance in the development of this guidance document
Current Industrial Waste Focus
Group Members
Paul Bar*, The Dow Chemical
Company
Walter Carey. Nestle USA Inc and
New Miltord Farms
Rama Chaturvedi Bethlehem Steel
Corporation
H.C. Clark. Rice University
Barbara Dodds, League of Women
voters
Chuck Feerick. Exxon Mobil
Corporation
Stacey Ford. Exxon Mobil
Corporation
Robert Giraud OuPont Company
John Harney Citizens Round
Tabte/PURE
Kyle Isakower. American Petroleum
Institute
Richard Jarman, National Food
Processors Association
James Meiers, Cinergy Power
Generation Services
Scott Murto. General Motors and
American Foundry Society
James Roewer, Edison Electric
Institute
Edward Repa. Environmental
Industry Association
Tim Savior, International Paper
Amy Schaffer. Weyerhaeuser
Ed Skemofc, WMX Technologies. Inc
Michael Wach Western
Environmental Law Center
David Wens, University of South
Wabnms Medical Center
Pat Gwn Cherokee Nation of
Oklahoma
Past industrial Waste Focus
Group Members
Dora Cetofius. Sierra Club
Brian Forrestal. Laidlaw Waste
Systems
Jonathan Greenberg. Browning-
Ferris Industries
Michael Gregory, Arizona Toxics
Information and Sierra Club
Andrew Mites The Dexter
Corporation
Gary Robbins, Exxon Company
Kevin Sail. National Paint & Coatings
Association
Bruce SteJne. American Iron & Steel
Lisa Williams, Aluminum Association
Cuircnt Industrial Waste Steering
Committee Members
Keiiy Catalan Aaaocauon oi Slate
and Territorial Solid Waste
Management Officials
Marc Crooks, Washington State
Department ot Ecology
Cyndi Darling. Maine Department of
Environmental Protection
Jon DilDard Montana Department of
Environmental Qualty
Anne Dobbs. Texas Natural
Resources Conservation
Commission
Richard Hammond New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Elizabeth Haven California State
Waste Resources Control Board
Jim Hul Missouri Department of
Natural Resources
Jim Knudson, Washington State
Department of Ecology
Chris McGuire, Florida Department
of Environmental Protection
Gene Mitchell Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
William Pounds, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection
Bijan Sharafkhani Louisiana
Department of Environmental
Qualty
James Warner, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency
ittustrial Waste Steering
Pamela um*. nianie
Environmental Protection
NormGumenik Arizona Department
of Environmental Qualty
Steve Jenkins, Alabama Department
of Environmental Management
Jim North Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality
-------
Industrial waste is generated by the production
of commercial goods, products, or services.
Examples include wastes from the production
of chemicals, iron and steel, and food goods.
-------
Guide For Industrial Waste Management
EPA530-R-03-001
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Ariel Rios Building, NW
Washington, DC 20460
February 2003
Printed on paper containing at least 50% postconsumer recovered fiber.
-------
Contents
Contents
Introduction
Part I Getting Started
1 Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
2 Characterizing Waste
3 Integrating Pollution Prevention
4 Considering the Site
Part II Protecting Air Quality
5 Protecting Air Quality
Part III Protecting Surface Water
6 Protecting Surface Water
Part IV Protecting Ground Water
7A Assessing Risk
7B Designing and Installing Liners: Technical Considerations for New Surface Impoundments, Landfills, and
Waste Piles
7C Designing a Land Application Program
Part V Ensuring Long-Term Protection
8 Operating the Waste Management System
9 Monitoring Performance
lOTaking Corrective Action
11 Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Glossary
v.
-------
Introduction
EPA's Guide for Industrial Waste Management
Introduction
Welcome to EPA's Guide for Industrial Waste Management. The pur-
pose of the Guide is to provide facility managers, state and tribal
regulators, and the interested public with recommendations and
tools to better address the management of land-disposed, non-haz-
ardous industrial wastes. The Guide can help facility managers make
environmentally responsible decisions while working in partnership
with state and tribal regulators and the public. It can serve as a
handy implementation reference tool for regulators to complement
existing programs and help address any gaps. The Guide can also
help the public become more informed and more knowledgeable in
addressing waste management issues in the community.
In the Guide, you will find:
• Considerations for siting industrial waste management units
• Methods for characterizing waste constituents
• Fact sheets and Web sites with information about individual waste constituents
• Tools to assess risks that might be posed by the wastes
• Principles for building stakeholder partnerships
• Opportunities for waste minimization
• Guidelines for safe unit design
• Procedures for monitoring surface water, air, and ground water
• Recommendations for closure and post-closure care
Each year, approximately 7.6 billion tons of industrial solid waste are generated and disposed
of at a broad spectrum of American industrial facilities. State, tribal, and some local governments
have regulatory responsibility for ensuring proper management of these wastes, and their pro-
grams vary considerably. In an effort to establish a common set of industrial waste management
guidelines, EPA and state and tribal representatives came together in a partnership and developed
the framework for this voluntary Guide. EPA also convened a focus group of industry and public
interest stakeholders chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act to provide advice
throughout the process. Now complete, we hope the Guide will complement existing regulatory
programs and provide valuable assistance to anyone interested in industrial waste management.
VII.
-------
Introduction
What Are the Underlying Principles of the Guide?
When using the Guide for Industrial Waste Management, please keep in mind that it reflects
four underlying principles:
• Protecting human health and the environment. The purpose of the Guide is to pro-
mote sound waste management that protects human health and the environment. It
takes a multi-media approach that emphasizes surface-water, ground-water, and air
protection, and presents a comprehensive framework of technologies and practices that
make up an effective waste management system.
• Tailoring management practices to risks. There is enormous diversity in the type
and nature of industrial waste and the environmental settings in which it is managed.
The Guide provides conservative management recommendations and simple-to-use
modeling tools to tailor management practices to waste- and location-specific risks. It
also identifies in-depth analytic tools to conduct more comprehensive site-specific
analyses.
• Affirming state and tribal leadership. States, tribes, and some local governments
have primary responsibility for adopting and implementing programs to ensure proper
management of industrial waste. This Guide can help states, tribes, and local govern-
ments in carrying out those programs. Individual states or tribes might have more
stringent or extensive regulatory requirements based on local or regional conditions or
policy considerations. The Guide complements, but does not supersede, those regula-
tory programs; it can help you make decisions on meeting applicable regulatory
requirements and filling potential gaps. Facility managers and the public should con-
sult with the appropriate regulatory agency throughout the process to understand regu-
latory requirements and how to use this Guide.
• Fostering partnerships. The public, facility managers, state and local governments,
and tribes share a common interest in preserving quality neighborhoods, protecting the
environment and public health, and enhancing the economic well-being of the commu-
nity. The Guide can provide a common technical framework to facilitate discussion and
help stakeholders work together to achieve meaningful environmental results.
What Can I Expect to Find in the Guide?
The Guide for Industrial Waste Management is available in both hard-copy and electronic ver-
sions. The hard-copy version consists of five volumes. These include the main volume and four
supporting documents for the ground-water and air fate-and-transport models that were devel-
oped by EPA specifically for this Guide. The main volume presents comprehensive information
and recommendations for use in the management of land-disposed, non-hazardous industrial
waste that includes siting the waste management unit, characterizing the wastes that will be
disposed in it, designing and constructing the unit, and safely closing it. The other four vol-
umes are the user's manuals and background documents for the ground-water fate-and-trans-
port model—the Industrial Waste Evaluation Model (IWEM)—and the air fate-and-transport
model—the Industrial Waste Air Model (IWAIR).
VIM.
-------
Introduction
The electronic version of the Guide, which can be obtained either on CD-ROM or from EPA's
Web site , contains a large collection of
additional resources. These include an audio-visual tutorial for each main topic of the Guide;
the IWEM and IWAIR models developed by EPA for the Guide; other models, including the
HELP (Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance) Model for calculating infiltration rates;
and a large collection of reference materials to complement the information provided in each of
the main chapters, including chemical fact sheets from the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry, links to Web sites, books on pertinent topics, copies of applicable rules and
regulations, and lists of contacts and resources for additional information. The purpose of the
audio-visual tutorials is to familiarize users with the fundamentals of industrial waste manage-
ment and potentially expand the audience to include students and international users.
The IWEM and IWAIR models that come with the electronic version of the Guide are critical
to its purpose. These models assess potential risks associated with constituents in wastes and
make recommendations regarding unit design and control of volatile organic compounds to
help mitigate those risks. To operate, the models must first be downloaded from the Web site or
the CD-ROM to the user's personal computer.
What Wastes Does the Guide Address?
The Guide for Industrial Waste Management addresses non-hazardous industrial waste subject
to Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The reader is referred to
the existence of 40 CFR Part 257, Subparts A and B, which provide federal requirements for
non-hazardous industrial waste facilities or practices. Under RCRA, a waste is defined as non-
hazardous if it does not meet the definition of hazardous waste and is not subject to RCRA
Subtitle C regulations. Defining a waste as non-hazardous under RCRA does not mean that the
management of this waste is without risk.
This Guide is primarily intended for new industrial waste management facilities and units,
such as new landfills, new waste piles, new surface impoundments, and new land application
units. Chapter 7B-Designing and Installing Liners, and Chapter 4-Considering the Site, are
clearly directed toward new units. Other chapters, such as Chapter 8-Operating the Waste
Management System, Chapter 9-Monitoring Performance, Chapter 10-Taking Corrective
Action, Chapter 11-Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care, while primarily intended for
new units, can provide helpful information for existing units as well.
What Wastes Does the Guide Not Address?
The Guide for Industrial Waste Management is not intended to address facilities that primarily
handle the following types of waste: household or municipal solid wastes, which are managed
in facilities regulated by 40 CFR Part 258; hazardous wastes, which are regulated by Subtitle C
of RCRA; mining and some mineral processing wastes; oil and gas production wastes; mixed
wastes, which are solid wastes mixed with radioactive wastes; construction and demolition
debris; and non-hazardous wastes that are injected into the ground by the use of shallow
underground injection wells (these injection wells fall under the Underground Injection Control
(UIC) Program).
IX.
-------
Introduction
Furthermore, while the Guide provides many tools for assessing appropriate industrial waste
management, the information provided is not intended for use as a replacement for other exist-
ing EPA programs. For example, Tier 1 ground-water risk criteria can be a useful conservative
screening tool for certain industrial wastes that are to be disposed in new landfills, surface
impoundments, waste piles, or land application units, as intended by the Guide. These
ground-water risk criteria, however, cannot be used as a replacement for sewage sludge stan-
dards, hazardous waste identification exit criteria, hazardous waste treatment standards, MCL
drinking water standards, or toxicity characteristics to identify when a waste is hazardous—all
of which are legally binding and enforceable. In a similar manner, the air quality tool in this
Guide does not and cannot replace Clean Air Act Title V permit conditions that may apply to
industrial waste disposal units. The purpose of this Guide is to help industry, state, tribal, and
environmental representatives by providing a wealth of information that relays and defers to
existing legal requirements.
What is the Relationship Between This Guide and Statutory or
Regulatory Provisions?
Please recognize that this is a voluntary guidance document, not a regulation, nor does it
change or substitute for any statutory or regulatory provisions. This document presents techni-
cal information and recommendations based on EPAs current understanding of a range of
issues and circumstances involved in waste management The statutory provisions and EPA reg-
ulations contain legally binding requirements, and to the extent any statute or regulatory provi-
sion is cited in the Guide, it is that provision, not the Guide, which is legally binding and
enforceable. Thus, this Guide does not impose legally binding requirements, nor does it confer
legal rights or impose legal obligations on anyone or implement any statutory or regulatory
provisions. When a reference is made to a RCRA criteria, for example, EPA does not intend to
convey that any recommended actions, procedures, or steps discussed in connection with the
reference are required to be taken. Those using this Guide are free to use and accept other
technically sound approaches. The Guide contains information and recommendations designed
to be useful and helpful to the public, the regulated community, states, tribes, and local gov-
ernments. The word "should" as used in the Guide is intended solely to recommend particular
action and does not connote a requirements. Similarly, examples are presented as recommenda-
tions or demonstrations, not as requirements. To the extent any product, trade name, or com-
pany appears in the Guide, their mention does not constitute or imply endorsement or recom-
mendation for use by either the U.S. Government or EPA. Interested parties are free to raise
questions and objections about the appropriateness of the application of the examples present-
ed in the Guide to a particular situation.
x.
-------
Glossary
Glossary
24-hour, 25-year
storm event
acceptance and
conformance testing
access controls
active gas control
systems
adsorption
a rainfall event of 24 hours duration and of such a magnitude that it
has a 4 percent statistical likelihood of occurring in any given year.
methods used to evaluate the performance of geomembranes. While the
specific ASTM test methods vary depending on geomembrane type, rec-
ommended acceptance and conformance testing for geomembranes
includes evaluation of thickness, tensile strength and elongation, and
puncture and tear resistance testing, as appropriate.
measures, such as fences or security guards, used to restrict entry to a site.
mechanical means, such as a vacuum or pump, to forcibly remove gas
from a waste management unit.
the process by which molecules of gas, liquid, or dissolved solids adhere
to the surface of other particles, such as activated carbon or clay.
aerobic processes a biochemical process or condition occurring in the presence of oxygen.
agronomic rate
anaerobic processes
anchor trench
annular seal
attenuation
Atterberg limits
in land application, a waste application rate designed to provide the
amount of nitrogen needed by a crop or vegetation to attain a desired
yield, while minimizing the amount of nitrogen that will pass below the
root zone of the crop or vegetation to ground water.
a biological process that reduces organic matter to compounds such as
methane and carbon dioxide in an oxygen-free environment.
a long, narrow ditch along the perimeter of a unit cell in which the edges
of a geomembrane are buried or secured.
impermeable material used to prevent infiltration of surface water and
contaminants into the space between the borehole wall and the ground-
water well casing.
the process by which a compound is reduced in concentration over time
through chemical, physical, and biological processes such as adsorption,
degradation, dilution, and transformation.
a soil's plastic limit (percent moisture at which soil transitions from solid
to plastic) and its liquid limit (percent moisture at which soil transitions
from plastic to liquid); useful in characterizing soil plasticity when design-
ing liners with clay soils.
G-1
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
barrier (infiltration)
barrier walls
bathtub effect
bench-scale
treatability study
berm
best management
practices (BMPs)
bioaccumulation
biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD)
biodegradable
organic matter
biological treatment
in a final cover system, a layer preventing water infiltration into the
waste, indirectly promoting the storage and drainage of water from the
overlying protection and surface layers, and preventing the upward
movement of gases.
low permeability partitions used to direct uncontaminated ground-water
flow around a disposal site or to prevent contaminated material from
migrating from a site.
the buildup of leachate within a unit that occurs when the cover system
is more permeable than the liner. Leachate accumulates due to the infil-
tration rate through the cover system exceeding the exfiltration rate
through the liner system.
a study used to evaluate the effectiveness of one or more potential
treatment remedies. It establishes the validity of a technology and gener-
ates data indicating the remedy's potential to meet performance goals.
a raised flow diversion structure made from compacted earth or rock fill
and used to buttress a slope and prevent run-on from entering a waste
management unit.
measures used to reduce or eliminate contaminant releases to the
environment. BMPs can take the form of a process, activity, or physical
structure.
the uptake and concentration of substances, such as waste constituents,
by exposed organisms. This phenomenon has the potential to cause high
concentrations especially in the tissues of higher predators.
the amount of oxygen consumed in the biological processes that break
down organic matter (typically measured in mg oxygen per L waste or
leachate).
significant component of waste used in land application. Carbon-based
material derived from biological organisms; eventually decomposed by
microbes into nontoxic products often useful as plant nutrients.
(Compare to synthetic organic compounds.)
a process relying primarily on oxidative or reductive mechanisms initiat-
ed by microorganisms to stabilize or de-toxify a waste or leachate.
Biological treatment can rely either on aerobic or anaerobic processes.
G-2
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
blanks
borrow pit
samples of ground water, air, or other media, collected to determine
background contaminants in the field; used for comparison purposes
when analyzing monitoring data.
a location where soils are excavated for use as fill or for compaction
into liners.
buffer zone
calcium carbonate
equivalent (CCE)
capillary-break (CB)
approach
carbon to nitrogen
ratio
cation exchange
capacity
chain-of-custody
record
chemical oxygen
demand (COD)
chemical seaming
chemical treatment
an area between waste management units and other nearby properties,
such as schools. Buffer zones provide time and space to shield sur-
rounding properties from ongoing activities and disruptions associated
with waste management activities.
a measure of a waste's ability to neutralize soil acidity—its buffering
capacity—compared to pure calcium carbonate.
an alternative design for a final cover system that exploits the relative
differences in porosity between soil types to inhibit water infiltration.
in land application, the ratio of the relative quantities of these two
elements in a waste. Carbon is associated with the biodegradable
organic matter in a waste, and the carbon to nitrogen ratio reflects the
level of inorganic nitrogen available in the soil for plant growth.
the ability of a soil to take up and give off positively charged ions—a
process which affects the movement of metals in soil.
a document tracking possession of samples from the time of collection
through laboratory analysis. A chain-of-custody record generally
includes the date and time of collection, signatures of those involved
in the chain of possession, time and dates of possession, and other
notations to allow tracking of samples.
a measure of the oxygen equivalent of the organic matter in a waste
or leachate that is susceptible to oxidation by a strong chemical oxi-
dant such as chromate. COD is used to determine the degree of conta-
mination of a waste or leachate that is not readily biodegradable (see
biochemical oxygen demand.)
the use of solvents, cement, or an adhesive to join panels or rolls of a
liner. Chemical seaming processes include chemical fusion and adhe-
sive seaming.
a class of processes in which chemicals are added to wastes or to cont-
aminated media to reduce toxicity mobility, or volume.
G-3
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
closure
closure plan
collection and
sedimentation basin
compacted clay
liner (CCL)
construction quality
assurance (CQA)
construction quality
control (CQC)
control charts
corrective action
critical habitat
termination of the active life of a waste management accompanied by
one of the following measures: 1) use of engineered controls, such as a
final cover, and post-closure care activities to maintain and monitor
the controls, or 2) removal of waste and contaminated containment
devices and soils.
a document describing the procedure envisioned for the termination of
a waste management unit's active life. Topics addressed often include
future land use, whether wastes will be removed or left in place at clo-
sure, closure schedule, steps to monitor progress of closure actions,
contingency plans, and final cover information.
an area that retains runoff long enough to allow solids/particles that
are suspended in and being transported by surface water to settle out
by gravity.
a hydraulic barrier layer composed of natural mineral materials
(natural soils), bentonite-soil blends, and other materials placed and
compressed in layers called lifts.
a planned series of observations and tests of unit components, such as
liners, as they are being built. CQA is designed to ensure that the com-
ponents meet specifications. CQA testing, often referred to as accep-
tance inspection, provides a measure of final product quality and its
conformance with project plans and specifications.
an ongoing process of measuring and controlling the characteristics of
unit components, such as liners, in order to meet manufacturer's or
project specifications. CQC inspections are typically performed by the
contractor to provide an in-process measure of construction quality
and conformance with the project plans and specifications, thereby
allowing the contractor to correct the construction process if the quali-
ty of the product is not meeting the specifications and plans.
a statistical method of evaluating ground-water monitoring data using
historical data for comparison purposes. Appropriate only for initially
uncontaminated wells.
the process of taking appropriate steps to remediate any contamination.
areas which are occupied by endangered or threatened species and
which contain physical or biological features essential to the prolifera-
tion of the species.
G-4
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
daily cover
a level of soil and/or other materials applied at the end of a day after
waste has been placed, spread, and compacted. Covering the waste
helps control nuisance factors, such as the escape of odors, dust, and
airborne emissions, and can limit disease vectors.
a notation on a property's deed or title placing limits and conditions
on the use and conveyance of the property.
a storm of an intensity, volume, and duration predicted to recur once
in a given number of years, whose effects you are designing a system
or structure to withstand. (See 24-hour, 25-year storm event.)
the removal of a sample from a liner seam or sheet to perform tests to
assess quality.
DAFs are used to measure the difference in the concentration of waste
constituents found in the leachate released from a waste management
unit at the source and the same leachate subsequently arriving at a
receptor well. DAF is defined as the ratio of the leachate concentration
at the source to the receptor well concentration.
direct-push sampling a method of sampling ground water by hydraulically pressing and/or
vibrating a probe to the desired depth and retrieving a ground-water
sample through the probe. The probe is removed for reuse after the
desired volume of ground water is extracted.
deed restriction
design storm event
destructive testing
dilution/attenuation
factor (DAF)
diversion dike
downgradient well
drainage layer
a raised land feature built to channel or control the flow of run-on and
runoff water around and within a waste management unit.
a ground-water monitoring installation built to detect contaminant
plumes from a waste management unit. In the absence of specific state
requirements, monitoring points should be no more than 150 meters
downgradient from your waste management unit boundary and placed
in potential contamination migration pathways.
in a final cover system, a stratum that directs infiltrating water to
drainage systems at the toe of the cover. The drainage layer can be
placed below the surface or protection layer, but above the barrier
layer.
electrical conductivity the ability of a sample to carry an electrical charge. Used in land
(EC) application to estimate the total dissolved solids content of a soil or waste.
emergency response
plan
procedures to address major types of waste management unit
emergencies: accidents, spills, and fires/explosions.
G-5
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
environmental justice the practice of identifying and addressing, as appropriate, dispropor-
tionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of
waste manage ment programs, policies, and activities on minority and
low-income populations.
environmental stress
cracks
EPA's Composite
Model for Leachate
Migration with
Transformation
Products (EPACMTP)
erosion layer
expansive soils
fate and transport
modeling
fault
field study
filter pack
final
cover
financial assurance
mechanism
imperfections or failures in a liner caused by environmental factors
before the liner is stressed to its stated maximum strength.
EPACMTP is a ground-water fate and transport model. It simulates
subsurface fate and transport of contaminants leaching from the
bottom of a waste management unit and predicts concentrations of
those contaminants in a downstream receptor as well.
(see surface layer.)
soils that lose their ability to support a foundation when subjected to
certain natural events, such as heavy rain, or human-caused events,
such as explosions.
a methodology which examines numerous waste and site characteris-
tics to determine how waste constituents move through the environ-
ment, how they are degraded or changed, and where they end up.
a failure that occurs in a geologic material, such as rock, when tectonic,
volcanic, or other stresses exceed the material's ability to withstand them.
in land application, a scientific investigation of waste, soil, and plant
interaction conducted under natural environmental conditions.
(Compare to greenhouse study.)
in a ground-water monitoring well, a quantity of chemically inert
material such as quartz sand, that prevents material from surrounding
geological formations from entering the well intake and helps stabilize
the adjacent formation. Might be necessary in boreholes that are over-
sized with regard to the casing and well intake diameter.
a system of multiple layers of soil; engineered controls, such as liners; and/
or other materials placed atop a closed waste management unit. Typically
improves aesthetics, prevents erosion, blocks roots and burrowing animals,
collects and drains incoming water, provides a barrier between waste and
the environment, and collects gas generated within the unit.
a funding instrument, such as a bond or trust, that provides or
guarantees sufficient financial resources for the closure and post-clo-
sure care of a unit in the event the owner or operator is unable to pay.
G-6
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
fines
100-year floodplain
foundation/gas
collection layer
freeboard
freeze-thaw cycles
fugitive dust
fugitive emission
control
gabion
gas migration
geogrid
geomembrane
geophysical
monitoring
silt and clay-sized particles.
a relatively flat, lowland area adjoining inland and coastal waters that
is susceptible to inundation during a 100-year flood. A 100-year flood
is a large magnitude occurrence with a 1 percent chance of recurring
in any given year.
in a final cover system, a stratum of permeable material such as sand
or gravel that controls the migration of gases to collection vents and
supports overlying strata.
depth (capacity) intended to remain unused above the expected highest
liquid level in a liquid storage facility, such as a surface impoundment.
climatic changes in which water enters a small crack in a material,
expands upon freezing, and thereby expands the crack; the process
then repeats itself and the crack progressively grows. It can increase
the hydraulic conductivity of low permeability soil layers or damage
geomembranes in final covers.
solid paniculate matter, excluding paniculate matter emitted from
exhaust stacks, that become airborne directly or indirectly as a result
of human activity.
dust suppression at a waste management unit through measures such
as watering or chemical dust suppression.
a structure formed from crushed rock encased in wire mesh and used
to check erosion and sediment transport.
the lateral and/or vertical movement of gas through a waste management
unit or its cover systems; can convey methane or other dangerous gases
to other sites or buildings if gas monitoring is not implemented.
plastic material manufactured into an open, lattice-like sheet configu-
ration and typically used as reinforcement; designed with apertures or
openings sized to allow strike through of surrounding rock and soil.
a synthetic sheet composed of one or more plastic polymers with ingre-
dients such as carbon black, pigments, fillers, plasticizers, processing
aids, cross- linking chemicals, anti-degradants, and biocides.
Geomembranes are used as hydraulic barriers in liner and cover systems.
measurement of changes in the geophysical characteristics of
subsurface soils, and in some cases, in the ground water itself, to
determine potential changes in ground-water quality.
G-7
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
geosynthetic clay
liner (GCLs)
geotextile
gravel
greenhouse study
ground-water
monitoring well
ground-water
monitoring program
ground-water
pump-and-treat
ground-water
specialist
health-based number
(HBN)
hydraulic
conductivity
a factory-manufactured, hydraulic barrier typically consisting of
bentonite clay (or other very low permeability materials), supported by
geotextiles and/or geomembranes held together by needling, stitching,
or chemical adhesives.
a woven, nonwoven, or knitted synthetic fabric used as a filter to pre-
vent the passing of fine-grained material such as silt or clay. A geotex-
tile can be placed on top of a drainage layer to prevent the layer from
becoming clogged with fine material.
soil particles unable to pass through the openings of a U.S. Number 4
sieve, which has 4.76 mm (0.2 in.) openings.
in land application, a scientific investigation of waste, soil, and plant
interaction conducted under controlled indoor conditions. (Compare
to field study.)
a borehole in soil outfitted with components typically including a
casing, an intake, a filter pack, and annular and surface seals; used to
collect ground water from one or more soil layers for sampling and
analysis.
The objectives of a ground-water monitoring program are to measure
the effectiveness of a waste management unit's design; to detect changes,
or the lack thereof, in the quality of ground water caused by the pres-
ence of a waste management unit; and to provide data to accurately
determine the nature and extent of any contamination that might occur.
a ground-water remediation technology in which contaminated water
is pumped to the surface for treatment.
a scientist or engineer who has received a baccalaureate or post-
graduate degree in the natural sciences or engineering and has suffi-
cient training and experience in ground-water hydrology and related
fields as demonstrated by state registration, professional certifications,
or completion of accredited university programs that enable that indi-
vidual to make sound professional judgements regarding ground-water
monitoring, contaminant fate and transport, and corrective action.
a concentration limit for a waste constituent. The HBN is derived from
reference doses or reference concentrations that estimate the maximum
daily exposure to a waste constituent through a specific pathway (i.e.,
ingestion) that would be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects
during a lifetime.
the velocity at which a fluid, such as leachate, flows through a material,
such as a compacted clay liner.
G-8
-------
Glossary
hydraulic loading
capacity
hydraulic
overloading
hydrogeologic
characterization
Glossary (cont.)
in land application, the quantity of liquid or aqueous waste that can be
assimilated per unit area by the soil system.
in land application, the application of waste in excess of the liquid or
water handling capacity of a soil; can result in ponding, anaerobic
waste degradation, and odors.
study and quantification of a site's subsurface features to determine
ground-water flow rate and direction; necessary for an effective
ground-water monitoring program.
Hydrologic an EPA model that evaluates the relative performance of various final
Evaluation of Landfill cover designs, estimates the flow of water across and through a final
Performance (HELP) cover, and determines leachate generation rates.
infiltration
in-situ soil
institutional control
interfacial shear
interim measure
internal shear
ISO 14000
procedures
the entry of precipitation, ground water, waste, or other liquid into a
soil layer or other stratum.
geological material already present at a site; known as an in-situ liner
when used as a barrier layer in place of imported soil or synthetic
materials.
a measure that can be used by responsible parties and regulatory agen-
cies to prevent use of or access to a site in a remedial program where,
as part of the program, certain levels of contamination will remain on
site in the soil or ground water. Can also be considered in situations
where there is an immediate threat to human health; can include deed
restrictions, restrictive covenants, use restrictions, access controls,
notices, registry act requirements, transfer act requirements, and con-
tractual obligations.
the friction or stress between components, such as a compacted clay
liner and a geomembrane, that occurs on side slopes of waste manage-
ment units. When the interfacial shear is inadequate, a weak plane can
form on which sliding can occur. The shift in components can com-
promise liner and cover performance, negatively affecting unit stability.
in corrective action, a step taken to control or abate ongoing risks
before final remedy selection.
a stress that can lead to tearing of liner or cover components when
overlying or underlying pressure upon a liner or cover exceeds its abil-
ity to withstand this stress.
voluntary set of standards for good environmental practices developed
by the International Standards Organization (ISO), also known as
Environmental Management Standards (EMS).
G-9
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
karst terrain
land application
areas containing soluble bedrock, such as limestone or dolomite, that
have been dissolved and eroded by water, leaving characteristic phys-
iographic features including sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, large
springs, and blind valleys.
(see land application unit.)
land application unit a waste management unit in which waste (such as sludge or waste-
water) is spread onto or incorporated into the land to amend the soil
and/or treat or dispose of the waste.
landfills
leachate
leachate
concentration
leachate collection
and removal system
leachate testing
leak detection
system (LDS)
lifts
liner
in-situ soil
a waste management unit in which waste is compacted in engineered
cells for permanent disposal, usually covered daily.
liquid (usually water) that has percolated through waste and taken
some of the waste or its constituents into solution.
the concentration (usually in mg/L) of a particular waste constituent in
the leachate.
a system of porous media, pipes, and pumps that collect and convey
leachate out of a unit and/or control the depth of leachate above a liner.
used to characterize waste constituents and their concentrations, and
to estimate the potential amount and/or rate of the release of waste
constituents under worst case environmental conditions.
also known as a secondary leachate collection and removal system; a
redundant leachate collection and removal system to detect and cap-
ture leachate that escapes or bypasses the primary system. Sudden
increases in leachate captured by an LDS can indicate failure of a pri-
mary leachate collection and removal system.
layers of compacted natural mineral materials (natural soils), ben-
tonite-soil blends, and other materials that compose a liner or other
compacted stratum.
a hydraulic barrier, such as compacted clay or a geomembrane, used to
restrict the downward or lateral escape of waste, waste constituents,
and leachate. Liners accomplish this by physically impeding the flow
of leachate and/or by adsorbing or attenuating pollutants.
geological material already present at a site; known as an in-situ liner
when used as a barrier layer in place of imported soil or synthetic
materials.
G-10
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
single liner
composite liner
double liner
liquefaction
a hydraulic barrier consisting of one soil layer, one geomembrane, or
any other individual barrier without a second barrier to impede conta-
minants that might breach it.
a liner consisting of both a geomembrane and a compacted clay layer
(or a geosynthetic clay liner).
a hydraulic barrier between a waste management unit and the natural
environment, consisting of primary (top) and secondary (bottom) lev-
els. Each level can consist of compacted clay, a geomembrane, or a
composite (consisting of a geomembrane and a compacted clay layer
or GCL).
occurs when vibrating motions caused by an earthquake turn saturated
sand grains in the soil into a viscous fluid, diminishing the bearing
capacity of the soil and possibly leading to foundation and slope fail-
ures.
the description of geological materials on the basis of their physical
and chemical characteristics.
the minimum percentage of a gas by volume in the air that is necessary
for an explosion. This level is 5 percent for methane.
a device used to measure the quantity or rate of water movement
through or from a block of soil or other material. It collects soil-pore
liquids by applying a vacuum that exceeds the soil moisture tension;
usually a buried chamber made from wide perforated pipe.
used to calculate all input and output streams, such as the annual
quantities of chemicals transported to a facility and stored, used, or
produced at a facility, and released or transported from a facility as a
commercial product or by-product or a waste. Material balances can
assist in determining concentrations of waste constituents where ana-
lytical test data are limited.
Maximum Achievable national standards that regulate major sources of hazardous air
Control Technology pollutants. Each MACT standard specifies particular operations,
(MACT) standards processes, and/or wastes that are covered. If a facility is covered by a
MACT standard, it must be permitted under Title V
lithology
lower explosive
limit (LEL)
lysimeter
material balances
maximum
contaminant level
(MCL)
the maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water delivered to
any user of a public water system.
G-11
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
molding water
content
for natural soils, the degree of saturation of the soil liner at the time of
compaction; influences the engineering properties, such as hydraulic
conductivity, of the compacted material.
Monte Carlo analysis an iterative process involving the random selection of model parameter
values from specified frequency distributions, followed by simulation
of the system and output of predicted values. The distribution of the
output values can be used to determine the probability of occurrence
of any particular value given the uncertainty in the parameters. In this
guidance, used to predict a statistical distribution of exposures and
risks for a given site.
National Ambient Air airborne emission limits set by EPA as authorized by the Clean Air Act.
Quality Standards EPA has designated NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants:
(NAAQS) ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, lead, particulate matter, and
carbon monoxide.
National Emission
Standards for
Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP)
numeric clean-up
standard
operating plan
overland flow
("flood") application
national standards regulating 188 hazardous air pollutants listed in
Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
a state corrective action requirement mandating that a site be cleaned
up such that concentrations of a waste constituent do not exceed a set
level.
a document that specifies methods of running a waste management
unit, such as standard waste-handling practices, management and
maintenance activities, employee training, and emergency plans; based
on comprehensive knowledge of the chemical and physical composi-
tion of the waste managed, unit type, operational schedules, and mon-
itoring performed at the unit.
land application of liquid waste by irrigation methods; can lead to
increased surface runoff of waste if not properly managed and, there-
fore, is regulated by some states and localities.
parametric analysis a method of statistical analysis that attempts to determine whether
of variance (ANOVA) different monitoring wells have significantly different average con-
stituent concentrations.
particulate matter
(PM)
a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets suspended in the
atmosphere that can cause a variety of respiratory problems, carry
adsorbed pollutants far from their source, impair visibility, and stain or
damage surfaces, such as buildings or clothes, on which it settles.
G-12
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
passive gas control
system
pathogens
peak flow period
pH adjustment
piezometer
pilot-scale
treatability study
plasticity
characteristics
plume
point of monitoring
post-closure care
a gas control system using natural pressure and convection
mechanisms to control gas migration and to help vent gas emissions
into the atmosphere; can include ditches; trenches; vent walls; perfo-
rated pipes surrounded by coarse soil; synthetic membranes; and high
moisture, fine-grained soil.
potentially disease-causing microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses,
protozoa, and the eggs of parasitic worms.
the phase of a storm event when flood waters are at their highest level.
A measure of acidity or alkalinity equal to the logarithm of the recipro-
cal of hydrogen ion (H+) concentration in a medium. pH is represent-
ed on a scale of 0 to 14; 7 represents a neutral state, 0 represents the
most acid, and 14 the most alkaline.
the neutralization of acids and bases (alkaline substances) and promo-
tion of the formation of precipitates, which can subsequently be
removed by conventional settling techniques.
a well installed to monitor hydraulic head of ground water or to moni-
tor ground-water quality.
a small study to evaluate the effectiveness of and determine the
potential for continued development of one or more potential reme-
dies; typically conducted to generate information on quantitative per-
formance, cost, and design issues.
parameters describing a material's ability to behave as a moldable
material.
an elongated and mobile column or band of a contaminant moving
through the subsurface.
the location(s) where ground-water is sampled; should be appropriate
for site conditions and located at waste management boundary or out
to 150 meters downgradient of the waste management unit area.
monitoring of a closed waste management unit to verify and document
that unacceptable releases from the unit are not occurring. The overall
goal is to ensure that waste constituents are contained until such time
as containment is no longer necessary.
G-13
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
prediction intervals
process knowledge
protection layer
public involvement
public notice
puncture resistance
a statistical method of approximating future sample values from a pop-
ulation or distribution with a specific probability; used with ground-
water monitoring data, both for comparison of downgradient wells to
upgradient wells (interwell comparison) and for comparison of current
well data to previous data for the same well (intrawell comparison).
an understanding of industrial processes used to predict the types of
waste generated and to determine the mechanism by which they are
generated.
a stratum in a final cover system that protects the drainage layer from
intrusion by plant roots or burrowing animals; located below the sur-
face layer and above the drainage layer.
dialogue between facility owners and operators and public to share
information, identify and address issues and concerns, and provide
input into the decision-making process.
a document, announcement, or information release that publicizes a
meeting, decision, operational change, or other information of interest
to the public; usually provides the name and address of the facility
owner and operator and information about the issue being publicized.
the degree to which a material, such a liner, will resist rupture by
jagged or angular materials which might be placed above or below it.
quality assurance in ground-water sampling, steps for collection and handling of
and quality control ground-water samples to ensure accurate results. In liner construction,
(QA/QC) procedures steps to ensure that liners are installed according to design and will
perform specifications.
rational method
receptor
recycling
a method for calculating the volume of storm water runoff. The ratio-
nal method approximates the surface water discharge from a watershed
using a runoff coefficient, the rainfall intensity, and the drainage area.
a person or other organism that might be exposed to waste con-
stituents, especially an organism whose exposure is addressed by a fate
and transport analysis; or, a downgradient ground-water monitoring
well that receives ground water which has passed near a waste man-
agement unit.
the process of collecting, processing, and reusing waste materials.
redox (oxidation- the capacity of a medium to raise the valence state of molecules (such
reduction) potential as metals), add oxygen, or remove hydrogen (oxidation); or to lower the
valence state of molecules, remove oxygen, or add hydrogen (reduction).
G-14
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
riprap
rock cover used to protect soil in dikes or channels from erosion.
risk-based corrective an approach to corrective action that integrates the components of
action (RBCA) traditional corrective action with alternative risk and exposure assess-
ment practices. States and ASTM have developed RBCA as a three
stage process.
runoff
run-on
saline soil
sampling parameters
seaming process
seismic impact zone
setback
shear strength
silt fence
slip
storm water that flows from a waste management unit to surface waters.
storm water that falls directly on a waste management unit or flows
toward the unit from adjoining areas.
soil with excessive salt concentrations.
for monitoring, those items for which ground water samples will be tested,
such as waste constituents reasonably expected to migrate to the ground
water and other geochemical indicators of contaminant migration.
the joining of panels or rolls of a liner using thermal, chemical, or
other methods compatible with the properties of the liner material.
an area having a 10 percent or greater probability that the maximum
horizontal acceleration caused by an earthquake at the site will exceed
0. Ig in 250 years, g is a unit of force equal to the force exerted by
gravity on a body at rest and used to indicate the force to which a
body is subjected when accelerated.
the placing of a waste management unit or one of its components
some distance from an adjoining property, a geologic feature, or other
feature that could affect the unit or be affected by the unit. (Compare
to buffer zone.)
for soils, the internal resistance per unit area that a soil mass can offer
to resist failure and sliding along any plane inside it; in liner design,
indicates the degree to which stability problems and desiccation cracks
are likely to occur in liner material (such as clay).
a barrier consisting of geotextile fabric supported by wooden posts;
slows the flow of water and retains sediment as water filters through
the geotextile.
for soils, to slide downhill in mass movements such as avalanches,
land slides, and rock slides; can be caused by inherent properties of
the soil or by cutting or filling of slopes during construction.
G-15
-------
Glossary
slippage
sodic soil
soil gas sampling
soil-pore liquids
soil water content
soil water tension
solidification
processes
soluble salts
Source Loading and
Management Model
(SLAMM)
Glossary (cont.)
movement of a geomembrane liner due to a lack of adequate friction
between the liner and the soil subgrade or between any geosynthetic
components.
soil with excessive levels of sodium ions (Na+) relative to divalent ions,
such as calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+).
collection of gas from soil pores to detect the presence or movement of
volatile contaminants and gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane,
that are associated with waste degradation.
fluids present in spaces between soil particles in the vadose zone; can
be collected to determine the type and concentration of contaminants
that might be moving within the vadose zone.
the ratio of the weight of water to the weight of solids in a given vol-
ume of soil; usually stated as a percentage and can be greater than 100
percent for very soft clays.
a measure of the strength of capillary effects holding water between
soil particles; decreases as soil water content increases, so decreases in
soil water tension beneath a lined waste management unit might indi-
cate the presence of leachate due to a leaking liner.
the conversion of a non-solid waste into a solid, monolithic structure
that ideally will not permit liquids to percolate into or leach materials
out of the mass; used to immobilize waste constituents.
materials that could dissolve in or are already in solution in your
waste. Major soluble salts include calcium, magnesium, sodium, potas-
sium, chloride, sulfate, bicarbonate, and nitrate.
an urban nonpoint source water quality model developed by the
University of Alabama at Birmingham; useful for designing run-on and
runoff controls.
source reduction the prevention or reduction of waste at the point of generation.
spill prevention and procedures for avoiding accidental releases of waste or other
response contaminants and promptly addressing any releases that occur.
stabilization process a means of immobilizing waste constituents by binding them into an
insoluble matrix or by changing them to insoluble forms.
G-16
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
standard operating
procedures
storm water
conveyances
Storm Water
Management Model
(SWMM)
stratigraphy
subsidence
sump
surface completion
surface
impoundment
surface layer
surface seal
established, defined practices for the operation of a waste management
unit; useful in maintaining unit safety and protection of human health
and the environment; should be recorded in an operating plan to facil-
itate employees' familiarity.
pipes, ditches, swales, and other structures or landforms that carry,
divert, or direct run-on and/or runoff.
EPA computer model capable of simulating the movement of
precipitation and pollutants from the surface through pipe and
channel networks, storage treatment units, and finally to surface water;
used in the design of run-on and runoff controls.
characterization of the origin, distribution, and succession of geologic
strata, such as soil and rock layers.
lowering of the land surface due to factors such as excessive soil load-
ing, compaction of soil owing to high moisture content, or reduction
in waste volume due to degradation; can significantly impair the
integrity of the final cover system by causing ponding of water on the
surface, fracturing of low permeability infiltration layers, and failure of
geomembranes.
a low point in a liner system constructed to gravitationally collect
leachate from either the primary or secondary leachate collection system.
the part of a ground-water monitoring well constructed at or just
above ground level, often consisting of a protective outer casing
around the inner well casing, fitted with a locking cap; discourages
vandalism and unauthorized entry into the well, prevents damage by
contact with vehicles, reduces degradation caused by direct exposure
to sunlight, and prevents surface runoff from entering and infiltrating
the well.
a natural or manmade topographic depression, excavation, or diked
area designed to hold liquid waste.
in a final cover system, a stratum that promotes the growth of native,
nonwoody plant species, minimizes erosion, restores the aesthetics of
the site, and protects the barrier layer.
neat cement or concrete surrounding a ground-water monitoring well
casing and filling the space between the casing and the borehole at the
surface; protects against infiltration of surface water and potential con-
taminants from the ground surface.
G-17
-------
Glossary
Glossary (cont.)
synthetic organic
molecules
Synthetic
Precipitation
Leaching Procedure
(SPLP)
tear resistance
tensile behavior
tensiometer
man-made carbon compounds used in a variety of industrial and
agricultural processes, sometimes hazardous, and unlike biodegradable
organic matter, not necessarily biodegradable, or if biodegradable, not
necessarily broken down into nonhazardous byproducts.
The SPLP is currently used by several state agencies to evaluate the
leaching of TC hazardous constituents from wastes and can be used to
assess the risks posed by wastes placed in a landfill and subject to acid
rain. The SPLP is designed to determine the mobility of both organic
and inorganic analytes present in liquids, soils, and wastes.
the ability of a material, such as a geomembrane, to resist being split
due to stresses at installation, high winds, or handling.
the tendency of a material to elongate under strain.
an instrument that measures soil water tension.
terraces and benches earthen embankments with flat tops or ridges and channels; used to
hold moisture and minimize sediment loadings in runoff.
test pad
in liner design, a small-scale replica of a liner system used to verify
that the materials and methods tested will yield a liner that provides
the desired hydraulic conductivity.
thermal seaming the use of heat to join panels or rolls of a liner.
Title V operating
permits
toe
tolerance interval
topography
total dissolved solids
(TDS)
established by the Clean Air Act, these permits are required for any
facility emitting or having the potential to emit more than 100 tons per
year of any air pollutants, as defined by Section 302(g) of the Clean
Air Act. Permits are also required for all sources subject to MACT or
NSPS standards.
the lower endpoint of a slope.
a statistical interval constructed from data designed to contain a por-
tion of a population, such as 95 percent of all sample measurements;
used to compare data from a downgradient well to data from an
upgradient well.
the physical features (configuration) of a surface area including relative
elevations and the position of natural and constructed features.
the sum of all ions in solution.
G-18
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
total solids content
Toxicity
Characteristic
Leaching Procedure
(TCLP)
ultraviolet resistance
unstable area
upgradient well
upper explosive
limit
use restrictions
vadose
zone
the sum of suspended and dissolved solids in a liquid waste, usually
expressed as a percentage.
The TCLP is most commonly used by EPA and state agencies to
evaluate the leaching potential of wastes, and to determine toxicity
The TCLP quantifies the extractability of certain hazardous
constituents from solid waste under a defined set of laboratory condi-
tions. It evaluates the leaching of metals, volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds, and pesticides from wastes.
the degree to which a material, such as a geomembrane, can resist degra-
dation and cracking from prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
a location susceptible to human-caused or natural events or forces,
such as earthquakes, capable of impairing the integrity of a waste man-
agement unit.
a ground-water monitoring installation built to measure background
levels of contamination in ground water at an elevation before it
encounters a waste management unit.
the maximum percentage of a gas by volume in the air that will permit
an explosion. This level is 15 percent for methane; at higher percent-
ages, non- explosive burning is still possible.
stipulations describing appropriate and inappropriate future uses of a
closed site, in an effort to perpetuate the benefits of the remedial
action and ensure property use that is consistent with the applied
clean-up standard.
the soil (or other strata) between the ground surface and the saturated
zone; depending on climate, soils, and geology, can be very shallow or
as deep as several hundred feet.
vegetative cover layer (see surface layer.)
volatile organic carbon compounds which tend to evaporate at low to moderate
compounds (VOCs) temperatures due to their low vapor pressure.
waste pile
a noncontainerized accumulation of solid, nonflowing waste that is
used for treatment or storage.
G-19
-------
Glossary (cont.)
Glossary
waste reduction
water content
well casing
well intake
(well screen)
well purging
methods
wellhead protection
area (WHPA)
wetlands
working face
zoning
waste reduction practices include source reduction, recycling and reuse,
and treatment of waste constituents. Waste reduction minimizes the
amount of waste that needs to be disposed of in the first place, and lim-
its the environmental impact of those wastes that actually are disposed.
(see soil water content.)
in a ground-water monitoring well, the pipe or tube lowered into the
borehole as the outer wall of the well; supports the sides of the hole
and prevents water from entering or leaving the well other than by
normal ground-water flow.
a perforated segment of a ground-water monitoring well designed to
allow ground water to flow freely into the well from an adjacent geo-
logical formation while minimizing or eliminating the entrance of fine-
grained materials such as clay or sand.
procedures for removing stagnant water from a ground-water monitoring
well and its filter pack before collecting a sample; employed to ensure
collection of samples that accurately represent current ground-water
quality.
the most easily contaminated zone surrounding a wellhead; officially
designated for protection in many jurisdictions to prevent public
drinking water sources from becoming contaminated.
areas, such as tidal zones, marshes, and bottomland forests, that are
inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency or
duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in sat-
urated soil conditions.
the area of a waste management unit, especially a landfill, where waste
is currently being placed and compacted.
local government classification of land into areas designated for differ-
ent use categories, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or agri-
cultural; used to protect public health and safety, maintain property
values, and manage development.
G-20
-------
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
The following members of the Industrial Waste Focus Group and the Industrial Waste
Steering Committee are gratefully acknowledged for all of their time and assistance in the
development of this guidance document.
Current Industrial Waste Focus Group Members
Paul Bork, The Dow Chemical Company
Walter Carey Nestle, USA, Inc. and New Milford Farms
Rama Chaturvedi, Bethlehem Steel Corporation
H.C. Clark, Rice University
Barbara Dodds, League of Women Voters
Chuck Feerick, ExxonMobil Corporation
Stacey Ford, ExxonMobil Corporation
Robert Giraud, DuPont Company
John Harney Citizens Round Table/PURE
Kyle Isakower, American Petroleum Institute
Richard Jarman, National Food Processors Association
James Meiers, Cinergy Power Generation Services
Scott Murto, General Motors and American Foundry Society
James Roewer, Edison Electric Institute
Edward Repa, Environmental Industry Association
Tim Saylor, International Paper
Amy Schaffer, Weyerhaeuser
Ed Skernolis, WMX Technologies, Inc.
Michael Wach, Western Environmental Law Center
David Wells, University of South Alabama Medical Center
Observer:
Pat Gwin, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
Past Industrial Waste Focus Group Members
Doris Cellarius, Sierra Club
Brian Forrestal, Laidlaw Waste Systems
Jonathan Greenberg, Browning-Ferris Industries
Michael Gregory, Arizona Toxics Information and Sierra Club
Andrew Miles, The Dexter Corporation
Gary Robbins, Exxon Company
Kevin Sail, National Paint & Coatings Association
Bruce Steiner, American Iron & Steel
Lisa Williams, Aluminum Association
Current Industrial Waste Steering Committee Members
Kerry Callahan, Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials
Marc Crooks, Washington State Department of Ecology
Cyndi Darling, Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Jon Billiard, Montana Department of Environmental Quality
Anne Dobbs, Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission
-------
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements (cont.)
Richard Hammond, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Elizabeth Haven, California State Waste Resources Control Board
Jim Hull, Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Jim Knudson, Washington State Department of Ecology
Chris McGuire, Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Gene Mitchell, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
William Pounds, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Bijan Sharafkhani, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
James Warner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Robert Dellinger, U.S. EPA
Thea McManus, U.S. EPA
Barnes Johnson, U.S. EPA
Richard Kinch, U.S. EPA
Paul Cassidy U.S. EPA
John Sager, U.S. EPA
Charlotte Bertrand, U.S. EPA
Ann Johnson, U.S. EPA
David Cozzie, U.S. EPA
Tim Taylor, U.S. EPA
Shen-Yi Yang, U.S. EPA
David Layland, U.S. EPA
Past Industrial Waste Steering Committee Members
Pamela Clark, Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Norm Gumenik, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Steve Jenkins, Alabama Department of Environmental Management
Jim North, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Pat Cohn, U.S. EPA
Dwight Hlustick, U.S. EPA
Ginny Cohen-Bradley, U.S. EPA
Mark Schuknecht, U.S. EPA
This Guide, CD-ROM, and the ground-water and air modeling tools were finalized with
assistance from Eastern Research Group (Birute Vanatta, David Frank, and Kimberly Ferguson),
HydroGeologic, Inc. (Jan Kool, Dua Guvansen, Ted Lillys, and Julie Feeney), Resource
Management Concepts, Inc. (Reid Rosnick), and Research Triangle Institute (Anne Cook Lutes,
Terrence Pierson, Susan Wolf, Robert Truesdale, Tony Marimpietri, Jeff Coburn, Jo Ellen
Brandmeyer, and Jesse Baskir).
-------
Part I
Getting Started
Chapter 1
Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
-------
-------
Contents
I. Understanding Risk Assessment 1 - 1
A. Introduction to Risk Assessment 1 - 1
B. Types of Risk 1 -2
C. Assessing Risk 1 - 3
1. Hazard Identification 1 - 5
2. Exposure Assessment: Pathways, Routes, and Estimation 1 - 5
3. Risk Characterization 1 - 8
4. Tiers for Assessing Risk 1 - 10
D. Results 1 - 10
II. Information on Environmental Releases 1 - 11
III. Building Partnerships 1 - 11
A. Develop a Partnership Plan 1 - 12
B. Inform the State and Public About New Facilities or Significant
Changes in Facility Operating Plans 1 - 13
C. Make Knowledgeable and Responsible People Available for Sharing Information 1 - 16
D. Provide Information About Facility Operations 1 - 16
Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships Activity List 1 - 19
Resources 1-20
Appendix 1-22
Tables:
Table 1: Effective Methods for Public Notification 1- 14
Figures:
Figure 1: Multiple Exposure Pathways/Routes 1 - 7
-------
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
This chapter will help you:
• Understand the basic principles of risk assessment and the science
behind it.
• Build partnerships between a company that generates and man-
ages waste, the community within which the company lives and
works, and the state agency that regulates the company in order
to build trust and credibility among all parties.
Rsidents located near waste man- A. IntfOdUCtJOn tO Risk
.gement units want to understand Assessment
he management activities taking This Guide pmyidts smiple-to-use risk
)lace in their neighborhoods. They assessment tools that can assist in determining
vant to know that waste is being the appropriate waste management practices
for surface impoundments, landfills, waste
piles, and land application units. The tools
estimate potential human health impacts from
a waste management unit by modeling two
possible exposure pathways: releases through
volatile air emissions and contaminant migra-
tion into ground water. Although using the
tools is simple, it is still essential to under-
stand the basic concepts of risk assessment to
be able to interpret the results and understand
the nature of any uncertainties associated with
the analysis. This section provides a general
overview of the scientific principles underly-
ing the methods for quantifying cancer and
Environmental risk communication skills
are critical to successful partnerships between
companies, state regulators, the public, and
other stakeholders. As more environmental
management decisions are made on the basis
of risk, it is increasingly important for all inter-
ested parties to understand the science behind
risk assessment. Encouraging public participa-
tion in environmental decision-making means
esidents located near waste man-
agement units want to understand
the management activities taking
place in their neighborhoods. They
ivant to know that waste is being
managed safely, without danger to public
health or the environment. This requires an
understanding of the basic principles of risk
assessment and the science behind it.
Opportunities for dialogue between facilities,
states, tribes, and concerned citizens, includ-
ing a discussion of risk factors, should take
place before decisions are made. Remember,
successful partnerships are an ongoing activity.
I
Understanding
Risk Assessment
ensuring that all interested parties understand
the basic principles of risk assessment and can
converse equally on the development of
assumptions that underlie the analysis.
This chapter will help address the fol-
lowing questions.
• What is risk and how is it assessed?
What are the benefits of building
partnerships?
What methods have been successful
in building partnerships?
What is involved in preparing a
stakeholder meeting?
1-1
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
noncancer risk. Ultimately, understanding the
scientific principles will lead to more effective
use of the provided tools.
B. Types of Risk
Risk is a concept used to describe situa-
tions or circumstances that pose a hazard to
people or things they value. People encounter
a myriad of risks during common everyday
activities, such as driving a car, investing
money, and undergoing certain medical pro-
cedures. By definition, risk is comprised of
two components: the probability that an
adverse event will occur and the magnitude
of the consequences of that adverse event. In
capturing these two components, risk is typi-
cally stated in terms of the probability (e.g.,
one chance in one million) of a specific
harmful "endpoint" (e.g., accident, fatality,
cancer).
In the context of environmental manage-
ment and this section in the Guide, risk is
defined as the probability or likelihood that
public health might be unacceptably impact-
ed from exposure to chemicals contained in
waste management units. The risk endpoints
resulting from the exposure are typically
grouped into two major consequence cate-
gories: cancer risk and noncancer risk.
The cancer risk category captures risks
associated with exposure to chemicals that
might initiate cancer. To determine a cancer
risk, one must calculate the probability of an
individual developing any type of cancer dur-
ing his or her lifetime from exposure to car-
cinogenic hazards. Cancer risk is generally
expressed in scientific notation; in this nota-
tion, the chance of 1 person in 1,000,000 of
developing cancer would be expressed as 1 x
10-6 or 1E-6.
The noncancer risk category is essentially a
catch-all category for the remaining health
effects resulting from chemical exposure.
Noncancer risk encompasses a diverse set of
effects or endpoints, such as weight loss,
enzyme changes, reproductive and develop-
mental abnormalities, and respiratory reac-
tions. Noncancer risk is generally assessed by
comparing the exposure or average intake of a
chemical with a corresponding reference (a
health benchmark), thereby creating a ratio.
The ratio so generated is referred to as the
hazard quotient (HQ). An HQ that is greater
than 1 indicates that the exposure level is
above the protective level of the health bench-
mark, whereas, an HQ less than 1 indicates
that the exposure is below the protective level
established by the health benchmark.
It is important to understand that exposure
to a chemical does not necessarily result in an
adverse health effect. A chemical's ability to
initiate a harmful health effect depends on
the toxicity of the chemical as well as the
route (e.g., ingestion, inhalation) and dose
(the amount that a human intakes) of the
exposure. Health benchmark values are used
to quantify a chemical's possible toxicity and
ability to induce a health effect, and are
derived from toxicity data. They represent a
"dose-response"1 estimate that relates the like-
lihood and severity of adverse health effects
to exposure and dose. The health benchmark
is used in combination with an individual's
exposure level to determine if there is a risk.
Because individual chemicals generate differ-
ent health effects at different doses, bench-
marks are chemical specific; additionally,
since health effects are related to the route of
exposure and the timing of the exposure,
health benchmarks are specific to the route
and the duration (acute, subchronic, or
chronic) of the exposure. The definitions of
acute, subchronic, and chronic exposures
vary, but acute typically implies an exposure
of less than one day, subchronic generally
indicates an exposure of a few weeks to a few
months, and chronic exposure can span peri-
ods of several months to several years.
Dose-response is the correlative relationship between the dose of a chemical received by a subject and the
degree of response to that exposure.
1-2
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
The health benchmark for carcinogens is
called the cancer slope factor. A cancer slope
factor (CSF) is defined as the upper-bound2
estimate of the probability of a response per
unit intake of a chemical over a lifetime and is
expressed in units of (mg/kg-d). The slope fac-
tor is used to estimate an upper-bound proba-
bility of an individual developing cancer as a
result of a lifetime of exposure to a particular
concentration of a carcinogen.
A reference dose (RfD) for oral exposure
and reference concentration (RfC) for inhala-
tion exposure are used to evaluate noncancer
effects. The RfD and RfC are estimates of daily
exposure levels to individuals (including sen-
sitive populations) that are likely to be with-
out an appreciable risk of deleterious effects
during a lifetime and are expressed in units of
mg/kg-d (RfD) or mg/m3 (RfC).
Most health benchmarks reflect some
degree of uncertainty because of the lack of
precise toxicological information on the peo-
ple who might be most sensitive (e.g., infants,
elderly, nutritionally or immunologically com-
promised) to the effects of hazardous sub-
stances. There is additional uncertainty
because most benchmarks must be based on
studies performed on animals, as relevant
human studies are lacking. From time-to-time
benchmark values are revised to reflect new
toxicology data on a chemical. In addition,
because many states have developed their own
toxicology benchmarks, both the ground-
water and air tools in this Guide enable a user
to input alternative benchmarks to those that
are provided.
There are several sources for obtaining
health benchmarks, some of which are sum-
marized in the text box on the following page.
Most of these sources have toxicological pro-
files and fact sheets on specific chemicals that
are written in a general manner and summa-
rize the potential risks of a chemical and how
it is currently regulated. One good Internet
Example of Health Benchmarks for
Acrylonitrile
Chronic:
inhalation CSF: 0.24 (mg/kg-d)
oral CSF: 0.54 (mg/kg-d)
RfC: 0.002 mg/m3
RfD: 0.001 mg/kg-d
Subchronic:
RfC: 0.02 mg/m3
Acute:
ATSDR MRL: 0.22 mg/m3
source is the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) . ATSDR provides fact sheets for many
chemicals. These fact sheets are easy to under-
stand and provide general information regard-
ing the chemical in question. An example for
cadmium is provided in the appendix at the
end of this chapter. Additional Internet sites
are also available such as: the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS); EPAs Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards Hazardous Air
Pollutants Fact Sheets; EPAS Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water Contaminant Fact
Sheets; New Jersey's Department of Health,
Right to Know Program's Hazardous Substance
Fact Sheets; Environmental Defense's
Chemical Scorecard; EPAS Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Chemical Fact
Sheets, American Chemistry Council (ACC),
and several others. Visit the Envirofacts
Warehouse Chemical References Complete
Index at for links to
these Web sites.
C. Assessing Risk
Sound risk assessment involves the use of
an organized process of evaluating scientific
data. A risk assessment ultimately serves as
Upper-bound is a number that is greater than or equal to any number in a set.
1-3
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Sources for Health Benchmarks
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) The
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) is the
Agency's official repository of Agency-wide, consensus,
chronic human health risk information. IRIS contains
Agency consensus scientific positions on potential
adverse human health effects that might result from
chronic (or lifetime) exposure to environmental contam-
inants. IRIS information includes the reference dose for
noncancer health effects resulting from oral exposure,
the reference concentration for noncancer health effects
resulting from inhalation exposure, and the carcinogen
assessment for both oral and inhalation exposure. IRIS
can be accessed at .
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
(HEAST) HEAST is a comprehensive listing compiled
by EPA consisting of risk assessment information relative
to oral and inhalation routes for chemicals. HEAST
benchmarks are considered secondary to those con-
tained in IRIS. Although the entries in HEAST have
undergone review and have the concurrence of individ-
ual Agency Program Offices, they have either not been
reviewed as extensively as those in IRIS or they do not
have as complete a data set as is required for a chemical
to be listed in IRIS. HEAST can be ordered from NTIS
by calling 1-800-553-IRIS or accessing their Website at
.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), requires
that the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) develop jointly with the EPA, in order
of priority, a list of hazardous substances most common-
ly found at facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities
List; prepare toxicological profiles for each substance
included on the priority list of hazardous substances;
ascertain significant human exposure levels (SHELs) for
hazardous substances in the environment, and the asso-
ciated acute, subchronic, and chronic health effects; and
assure the initiation of a research program to fill identi-
fied data needs associated with the substances. The
ATSDR Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) were developed as
an initial response to the mandate. MRLs are based on
noncancer health effects only and are not based on a
consideration of cancer effects. MRLs are derived for
acute (1-14 days), intermediate (15-364 days), and
chronic (365 days and longer) exposure durations, for
the oral and inhalation routes of exposure. ATSDR's tox-
icological profiles can be accessed at .
guidance for making management decisions by
providing one of the inputs to the decision
making process. Risk assessment furnishes ben-
eficial information for a variety of situations,
such as determining the appropriate pollution
control systems for an industrial site, predicting
the appropriateness of different waste manage-
ment options or alternative waste management
unit configurations, or identifying exposures
that might require additional attention.
The risk assessment process involves data
collection activities, such as identifying and
characterizing the source of the environmental
pollutant, determining the transport of the pol-
lutant once it is released into the environment,
determining the pathways of human exposure,
and identifying the extent of exposure for indi-
viduals or populations at risk.
Performing a risk assessment is complex and
requires knowledge in a number of scientific
disciplines. Experts in several areas, such as
toxicology, geochemistry, environmental engi-
neering, and meteorology, can be involved in
performing a risk assessment. For the purpose
of this section, and for brevity, the basic com-
ponents important to consider when assessing
risk are summarized in three main categories
listed below. A more extensive discussion of
these components can be found in the refer-
ences listed at the end of this section. The
three main categories are:
1-4
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
1. Hazard Identification: identifying
and characterizing the source of the
potential risk (e.g., chemicals man-
aged in a waste management unit).
2. Exposure Assessment: determining
the exposure pathways and exposure
routes from the source to an individual.
3. Risk Characterization: integrating
the results of the exposure assess-
ment with information on who is
potentially at risk (e.g., location of
the person, body weights) and chem-
ical toxicity information.
1. Hazard Identification
For the purpose of the Guide, the source
of the potential risk has already been identi-
fied: waste management units. However,
there must be a release of chemicals from a
waste management unit for there to be expo-
sure and risk. Chemicals can be released from
waste management units by a variety of
processes, including volatilization (where
chemicals in vapor phase are released to the
air), leaching to ground water (where chemi-
cals travel through the ground to a ground-
water aquifer), particulate emission (where
chemicals attached to particulate matter are
released in the air when the particulate mat-
ter becomes airborne), and runoff and ero-
sion (where chemicals in soil water or
attached to soil particles move to the sur-
rounding area).
To consider these releases in a risk assess-
ment, information characterizing the waste
management unit is needed. Critical parame-
ters include the size of the unit and its loca-
tion. For example, larger units have the
potential to produce larger releases. Units
located close to the water table might pro-
duce greater releases to ground water than
units located further from the water table.
Units located in a hot, dry, windy climate can
produce greater volatile releases than units in
a cool, wet, non-windy climate.
2. Exposure Assessment:
Pathways, Routes, and
Estimation
Individuals and populations can come into
contact with environmental pollutants by a
variety of exposure mechanisms and process-
es. The mere presence of a hazard, such as
toxic chemicals in a waste management unit,
does not denote the existence of a risk.
Exposure is the bridge between what is con-
sidered a hazard and what actually presents a
risk. Assessing exposure involves evaluating
the potential or actual pathways for and
extent of human contact with toxic chemi-
cals. The magnitude, frequency, duration, and
route of exposure to a substance must be
considered when collecting all of the data
necessary to construct a complete exposure
assessment.
The steps for performing an exposure
assessment include identifying the potentially
exposed population (receptors); pathways of
exposure; environmental media that transport
the contaminant; contaminant concentration
at a receptor point; and receptor's exposure
time, frequency, and duration. In a determin-
istic exposure assessment, single values are
assigned to each exposure variable. For exam-
ple, the length of time a person lives in the
same residence adjacent to the facility might
be assumed to be 30 years. Alternatively, in a
probabilistic analysis, single values can be
replaced with probability distribution func-
tions that represent the range in real-world
variability, as well as uncertainty. Using the
time in residence example, it might be found
that 10 percent of the people adjacent to the
facility live in their home for less than three
years, 50 percent less than six years, 90 per-
cent less than 20 years, and 99 percent less
than 27 years.
1-5
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
A probabilistic risk assessment is per-
formed by running the equations that
describe each distribution in a program in
conjunction with a Monte Carlo program.
The Monte Carlo program randomly selects a
value from the designated distribution and
mathematically treats it with numbers ran-
domly selected from distributions for other
parameters. This process is repeated a num-
ber of times (e.g., 10,000 times) to generate a
distribution of theoretical values. The person
assessing risk then uses his or her judgement
to select the risk value (e.g., 50th or 90th
percentile).
The output of the exposure assessment is a
numerical estimate of exposure and intake of
a chemical by an individual. The intake infor-
mation is then used in concert with chemical-
specific health benchmarks to quantify risks
to human health.
Before gathering these data, it is important
to understand what information is necessary
for conducting an adequate exposure assess-
ment and what type of work might be
required. Exposures are commonly deter-
mined by using mathematical models of
chemical fate and transport to determine
chemical movement in the environment in
conjunction with models of human activity
patterns. The information required for per-
forming the exposure assessment includes
site-specific data such as soil type, meteoro-
logical conditions, ground-water pH, and
location of the nearest receptor. Information
must be gathered for the two components of
exposure assessment: exposure
pathways/routes and exposure quantifica-
tion/estimation.
a. Exposure Pathways/Routes
An exposure pathway is the course the
chemical takes from its source to the individ-
ual or population it reaches. Chemicals cycle
in the environment by crossing through the
different types of media which are considered
exposure pathways: air, soil, ground water,
surface water, and biota (Figure 1). As a result
of this movement, a chemical can be present
in various environmental media, and human
exposure often results from multiple sources.
The relative importance of an exposure path-
way depends on the concentration of a chemi-
cal in the relevant medium and the rate of
intake by the exposed individual. In a com-
prehensive risk assessment, the risk assessor
identifies all possible site-specific pathways
through which a chemical could move and
reach a receptor. The Guide provides tools to
model the transport and movement of chemi-
cals through two environmental pathways: air
and ground water.
The transport of a chemical in the environ-
ment is facilitated by natural forces: wind and
water are the primary physical processes for
distributing contaminants. For example,
atmospheric transport is frequently caused by
ambient wind. The direction and speed of the
wind determine where a chemical can be
found. Similarly, chemicals found in surface
water and ground water are carried by water
currents or sediments suspended in the water.
The chemistry of the contaminants and of
the surrounding environment, often referred
to as the "system," also plays a significant role
in determining the ultimate distribution of
pollutants in the various types of media.
Physical-chemical processes, including disso-
lution/precipitation, volatilization, photolytic
and hydrolytic degradation, sorption, and
complexation, can influence the distribution
of chemicals among the different environ-
mental media and the transformation from
one chemical form to another3. An important
component of creating a conceptual model
for performing a risk assessment is the identi-
fication of the relevant processes that occur in
a system. These complex processes depend
on the conditions at the site and specific
chemical properties.
Kolluru, Rao (1996).
1-6
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Figure 1. Multiple Exposure Pathways/Routes (National Research
Council, "Frontiers in Assesssing Human Exposure," 1991)
into another chemical that is solu-
ble and can be excreted.
Some contaminants can also be
absorbed by the skin. The skin is
not very permeable and usually
provides a sufficient barrier against
most chemicals. Some chemicals,
however, can pass through the
skin in sufficient quantities to
induce severe health effects. An
example is carbon tetrachloride,
which is readily absorbed through
the skin and at certain doses can
cause severe liver damage. The
dermal route is typically consid-
ered in worker scenarios in which
the worker is actually performing
activities that involve skin contact
with the chemical of concern. The
tools provided in the Guide do
not address the dermal route of
exposure.
Whereas the exposure pathway dictates the
means by which a contaminant can reach an
individual, the exposure route is the way in
which that chemical comes in contact with
the body. To generate a health effect, the
chemical must come in contact with the body.
In environmental risk assessment, three expo-
sure routes are generally considered: inges-
tion, inhalation, and dermal absorption. As
stated earlier, the toxicity of a chemical is spe-
cific to the dose received and its means of
entry into the body. For example, a chemical
that is inhaled might prove to be toxic and
result in a harmful health effect, whereas the
same chemical might cause no reaction if
ingested, or vice-versa. This phenomenon is
due to the differences in physiological
response once a chemical enters the body. A
chemical that is inhaled reaches the lungs and
enters the blood system. A chemical that is
ingested might be metabolized into a different
chemical that might result in a health effect or
b. Exposure Quantification/Estimation
Once appropriate fate-and-transport mod-
eling has been performed for each pathway
providing an estimate of the concentration of
a chemical at an exposure point, the chemical
intake by a receptor must be quantified.
Quantifying the frequency, magnitude, and
duration of exposures that result from the
transport of a chemical to an exposure point
is critical to the overall assessment. For this
step, the risk assessor calculates the chemical-
specific exposures for each exposure pathway
identified. Exposure estimates are expressed
in terms of the mass of a substance in contact
with the body per unit body weight per unit
time (e.g., milligrams of a chemical per kilo-
gram body weight per day, also expressed as
mg/kg-day).
The exposure quantification process
involves gathering information in two main
areas: the activity patterns and the biological
1-7
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Key Chemical Processes
Sorption: the partitioning of a chemical between the liq-
uid and solid phase determined by its affinity for adhering
to other solids in the system such as soils and sediment.
The amount of chemical that "sorbs" to solids and does not
move through the environment is dependent upon the
characteristics of the chemical, the characteristics of the
surrounding soils and sediments, and the quantity of the
chemical. A sorption coefficient is the measure of a chemi-
cal's ability to sorb. If too much of the chemical is present,
the available binding sites on soils and sediments will be
filled and sorption will not continue.
Dissolution/precipitation: the taking in or coming out of
solution by a substance. In dissolution a chemical is taken
into solution; precipitation is the formation of an insoluble
solid. These processes are a function of the nature of the
chemical and its surrounding environment and are depen-
dent on properties such as temperature and pH. A chemical's
solubility is characterized by a solubility product. Chemicals
that tend to volatilize rapidly are not highly soluble.
Degradation: the break down of a chemical into other
substances in the environment. Some degradation processes
include biodegradation, hydrolysis, and photolysis. Not all
degradation products have the same risk as the "parent"
compound. Although most degradation products present
less risk than the parent compound, some chemicals can
break down into "daughter" products that are more harmful
than the parent compound. In performing a risk assessment
it is important to consider what the daughter products of
degradation might be.
Bioaccumulation: the take up/ingestion and storage of a
substance into an organism. For substances that bioaccu-
mulate, the concentrations of the substance in the organism
can exceed the concentrations in the environment since the
organism will store the substance and not excrete it.
Volatilization: the partitioning of a compound into a
gaseous state. The volatility of a compound is dependent
on its water solubility and vapor pressure. The extent to
which a chemical can partition into air is described by one
of two constants: Henry's Law or Rauolt's Law. Other fac-
tors that are important to volatility are atmospheric temper-
ature and waste mixing.
characteristics (e.g., body weight, inhalation
rate) of receptors. Activity patterns and bio-
logical characteristics dictate the amount of a
constituent that a receptor can intake and the
dose that is received per kilogram of body
weight. Chemical intake values are calculated
using equations that include variables for
exposure concentration, contact rate, exposure
frequency, exposure duration, body weight,
and exposure averaging time. The values of
some of these variables depend on the site
conditions and the characteristics of the
potentially exposed population. For example,
the rate of oral ingestion of contaminated food
is different for different subgroups of recep-
tors, which might include adults, children,
area visitors, subsistence farmers, and subsis-
tence fishers. Children typically drink greater
quantities of milk each day than adults per
unit body weight. A subsistence fisher would
be at a greater risk than another area resident
from the ingestion of contaminated fish.
Additionally, a child might have a greater rate
of soil ingestion than an adult due to playing
outdoors or hand-to-mouth behavior patterns.
The activities of individuals also determine the
duration of exposure. A resident might live in
the area for 20 years and be in the area for
more than 350 days each year. Conversely, a
visitor or a worker will have shorter exposure
times. After the intake values have been esti-
mated, they should be organized by popula-
tion as appropriate (e.g., children, adult
residents) so that the results in the risk char-
acterization can be reported for each popula-
tion group. To the extent feasible, site-specific
values should be used for estimating the expo-
sures; otherwise, default values suggested by
the EPA in The Exposure Factors Handbook
(EPA, 1995) can be used.
3. Risk Characterization
In the risk-characterization process, the
health benchmark information (i.e., cancer
slope factors, reference doses, reference concen-
1-8
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
trations) and the results of the exposure assess-
ment (estimated intake or dose by potentially
exposed populations) are integrated to arrive at
quantitative estimates of cancer and noncancer
risks. To characterize the potential noncarcino-
genic effects, comparisons are made between
projected intake levels of substances and refer-
ence dose or reference concentration values. To
characterize potential carcinogenic effects,
probabilities that an individual will develop
cancer over a lifetime are estimated from pro-
jected intake levels and the chemical-specific
cancer slope factor value. This procedure is the
final calculation step. This step determines who
is likely to be affected and what the likely
effects are. Because of all the assumptions
inherent in calculating a risk, a risk characteri-
zation cannot be considered complete unless
the numerical expressions of risk are accompa-
nied by explanatory text interpreting and quali-
fying the results. As shown in the text box, the
risk characterization step is different for car-
cinogens and noncarcinogens.
Calculating Risk
Cancer Risks:
Incremental risk of cancer = average
daily dose (mg/kg-day) * slope factor
(mg/kg-day)
Non-Cancer Risks:
Hazard quotient = exposure or intake
(mg/kg-day) or (mg/m3)/ RfD (mg/kg-
day) or RfC (mg/m3)
Another consideration during the risk-
characterization phase is the cumulative
effects of multiple exposures. A given popula-
tion can be exposed to multiple chemicals
from several exposure routes and sources.
Multiple constituents might be managed in a
single waste management unit, for example,
and by considering one chemical at a time,
the risks associated with the waste manage-
ment unit might be underestimated. The EPA
has developed guidance outlined in the Risk
Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I
(U.S. EPA, 1989b) to assess the overall poten-
tial for cancer and noncancer effects posed by
multiple chemicals. The risk assessor, facility
manager, and other interested parties should
determine the appropriateness of adding the
risk contribution of each chemical for each
pathway to calculate a cumulative cancer risk
or noncancer risk. The procedures for adding
risks differ for carcinogenic and noncarcino-
genic effects.
The cancer-risk equation described in the
adjacent box estimates the incremental indi-
vidual lifetime cancer risk for simultaneous
exposure to several carcinogens and is based
on EPA (1989a) guidance. The equation com-
bines risks by summing the risks to a recep-
tor from each of the carcinogenic chemicals.
Cancer Risk Equation for
Multiple Substances
RiskT = SRisk,
where:
RiskT = the total cancer risk,
expressed as a unitless probability.
SRiskj = the sum of the risk estimates
for all of the chemical risks.
Assessing cumulative effects from noncar-
cinogens is more difficult and contains a
greater amount of uncertainty than an assess-
ment for carcinogens. As discussed earlier,
noncarcinogenic risk covers a diverse set of
health effects and different chemicals will
have different effects. To assess the overall
potential for noncarcinogenic effects posed by
more than one chemical, EPA developed a
hazard index (HI) approach. The approach
assumes that the magnitude of an adverse
1-9
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
health effect is proportional to the sum of the
hazard quotients of each of the chemicals
investigated. In keeping with EPAfe Risk
Assessment Guidance, hazard quotients should
only be added for chemicals that have the
same critical effect (e.g., both chemicals affect
the liver or both initiate respiratory distress).
As a result, an extensive knowledge of toxi-
cology is needed to sum the hazard quotients
to produce a hazard index. Segregation of
hazard indices by effect and mechanism of
action can be complex, time-consuming, and
will have some degree of uncertainty associat-
ed with it. This analysis is not simple and
should be performed by a toxicologist.
4. Tiers for Assessing Risk
As part of the Guide, EPA has used a 3-
tiered approach for assessing risk associated
with air and water releases from waste man-
agement units. Under this approach, an
acceptable level of protection is provided
across all tiers, but with each progressive tier
the level of uncertainty in the risk analysis is
reduced. Reducing the level of uncertainty in
the risk analysis might reduce the level of
control required by a waste management unit
(if appropriate for the site), while maintaining
an acceptable level of protection. The facility
performing the risk assessment accepts the
higher costs associated with a more complex
risk assessment in return for greater certainty
and potentially reduced construction and
operating costs.
The advantages and relative costs of each
tier are outlined below.
Tier 1 Evaluation
• Allows for a rapid but conservative
assessment.
• Lower cost.
• Requires minimal site data.
• Contaminant fate-and-transport and
exposure assumptions are developed
using conservative, non-site specific
assumptions provided by EPA. The
values are provided in "look-up
tables" that serve as a quick and
straightforward means for assessing
risk. These values are calculated to be
protective over a broad range of con-
ditions and situations and are by
design very conservative.
Tier 2 Evaluation
• Represents a higher level of complex-
ity.
• Moderate cost.
• Provides the ability to input some
site-specific data into the risk assess-
ment and thus provides a more accu-
rate representation of site risk.
• Uses relatively simplistic fate and
transport models.
Tier 3 Evaluation
• Provides a sophisticated risk assess-
ment.
• Higher cost.
• Provides the maximum use of site-
specific data and thus provides the
most accurate representation of site
risk.
• Uses more complex fate-and-trans-
port models and analyses.
D. Results
The results of a risk assessment provide a
basis for making decisions but are only one
element of input into the process of designing
a waste management unit. The risk assess-
ment does not constitute the only basis for
management action. Other factors are also
important, such as technical feasibility of
options, public values, and economics.
Understanding and interpreting the results
for the purpose of making decisions also
requires a thorough knowledge of the
1-10
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
assumptions that were applied during the
risk assessment. Ample documentation
should be assembled to describe the scenarios
that were evaluated for the risk assessment
and any uncertainty associated with the esti-
mate. Information that should be considered
for inclusion in the risk assessment documen-
tation include: a description of the contami-
nants that were evaluated; a description of
the risks that are present (i.e., cancer, non-
cancer); the level of confidence in the infor-
mation used in the assessment; the major
factors driving the site risks; and the charac-
teristics of the exposed population. The
results of a risk assessment are essentially
meaningless without the information on how
they were generated.
II. Information on
Environmental
Releases
There are several available sources of infor-
mation that citizens can review to understand
chemical risk better and to review potential
environmental release from waste manage-
ment units in their communities. The
Emergency Planning and Community Right-
to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 provides one
such resource. EPCRA created the Toxic
Release Inventory (TRI) reporting program
which requires facilities in designated
Standard Industry Codes (see 40 CFR
§372.22) with more than 10 employees that
manufacture or process more than 25,000
pounds, or otherwise use more than 10,000
pounds, of a TRI- listed chemical to report
their environmental releases annually to EPA
and state governments. Environmental releas-
es include the disposal of wastes in landfills,
surface impoundments, land application
units, and waste piles. EPA compiles these
data in the TRI database and release this
information to the public annually. Facility
operators might wish to include TRI data in
the facility's information repository. TRI data,
however, are merely raw data. When estimat-
ing risk, other considerations need to be
examined and understood too, such as the
nature and characteristics of the specific facil-
ity and surrounding community.
In 1999, EPA promulgated a final rule that
established alternate thresholds for several
persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT)
chemicals (see 64 FR 58665; October 29,
1999). In this rule, EPA has added seven
chemicals to the EPCRA Section 313 list of
TRI chemicals and lowered the reporting
thresholds for another 18 PBT chemicals and
chemical categories. For these 18 chemicals,
the alternate thresholds are significantly lower
than the standard reporting thresholds of
25,000 pounds manufactured or processed,
and 10,000 pounds otherwise used.
EPCRA is based on the belief that citizens
have a right to know about potential environ-
mental risks caused by facility operations in
their communities, including those posed as a
result of waste management. TRI data, there-
fore, provide yet another way for residents to
learn about the waste management activities
taking place in their neighborhood and to
take a more active role in decisions that
potentially affect their health and environ-
ment. More information on TRI and access to
TRI data can be obtained from EPAfe Web site
.
III. Building
Partnerships
Building partnerships between all stake-
holders—the community, the facility, and the
regulators—can provide benefits to all par-
ties, such as:
1-11
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
• Better understanding of waste man-
agement activities at an industrial
facility.
• Better understanding of facility, state,
and community issues.
• Greater support of industry proce-
dures and state policies.
• Reduced delays and costs associated
with opposition and litigation.
• A positive image for a company and
relationship with the state and com-
munity.
Regardless of the size or type of a facility's
waste management unit, facilities, states, and
local communities can all follow similar prin-
ciples in the process of building partnerships.
These principles are described in various
state public involvement guidance docu-
ments, various EPA publications, and state
requirements for waste facilities. These prin-
ciples embody sound business practices and
common sense and can go beyond state
requirements that call for public participation
during the issuance of a permit. The Guide
recommends principles that can be adopted
throughout the operating life of a facility, not
just during the permitting process. Following
these principles will help all involved consid-
er the full range of activities possible to give
partners an active voice in the decision-mak-
ing process, and in so doing, will result in a
positive working relationship.
A. Develop a Partnership
Plan
The key to effective involvement is good
planning. Developing a plan for how and
when to involve all parties in making deci-
sions will help make partnership activities run
smoothly and achieve the best results.
Developing a partnership plan also helps iden-
tify concerns and determine which involve-
ment activities best i
address those con-
cerns.
The first step in
developing a part-
nership plan is to
work with the state
agency to under-
stand what involve-
ment requirements
exist. Existing state
requirements deal-
ing with partnership plans must be followed.
(Internet sites for all state environmental
agencies are available from .) After this step, you should
assess the level of community interest gener-
ated by a facility's waste management activi-
ties. Several criteria influence the amount of
public interest, including implications for
public health and welfare, current relation-
ships between the facility and community
members, and the community's political and
economic climate. Even if a facility has not
generated much public interest in the past,
involving the public is a good idea. Interest
in a facility can increase suddenly when
changes to existing activities are proposed or
when residents' attitudes and a community's
political or economic climate change.
To gauge public interest in a facility's waste
management activities and to identify the
community's major concerns, facility repre-
sentatives should conduct interviews with
community members. They can first talk
with members of community groups, such as
civic leagues, religious organizations, and
business associations. If interest in the facili-
ty's waste management activities seems high,
facility representatives can consider conduct-
ing a more comprehensive set of community
interviews. Other individuals to interview
include the facility's immediate neighbors,
representatives from other agencies and envi-
1-12
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
ronmental organizations, and any individuals
in the community who have expressed inter-
est in the facility's operations.
Using the information gathered during the
interviews, facility representatives can devel-
op a list of the community's concerns regard-
ing the facility's waste management activities.
They can then begin to engage the communi-
ty in discussions about how to address those
concerns. These discussions can form the
basis of a partnership plan.
B. Inform the State and
Public About New
Facilities or Significant
Changes in Facility
Operating Plans
A facility's decision to change its opera-
tions provides a valuable opportunity for
involvement. Notifying the state and public
of new units and proposed changes at exist-
ing facilities gives these groups the opportu-
nity to identify applicable state requirements
and comment on matters that apply to them.
What are examples of effective
methods for notifying the public?
Table 1 presents examples of effective
methods for public notification and associat-
ed advantages and disadvantages. The
method used at a particular facility, and
within a particular community, will depend
on the type of information or issues that
need to be communicated and addressed.
Public notices usually provide the name and
address of the facility representative and a
brief description of the change being consid-
ered. After a public notice is issued, a facility
can develop informative fact sheets to
explain proposed changes in more detail.
Fact sheets and public notices can include
the name and telephone number of a contact
person who is available within the facility to
answer questions.
What is involved in preparing a
meeting with industry, community,
and state representatives?
Meetings can be an effective means of giv-
ing and receiving comments and addressing
concerns. To publicize a meeting, the date,
time, and location of the meeting should be
placed in a local newspaper and/or advertised
on the radio. To help ensure a successful dia-
logue, meetings should be at times conve-
nient for members of the community, such as
early in the evenings during the week, or on
weekends. An interpreter might need to be
obtained if the local community includes resi-
dents whose primary language is not English.
Prior to a meeting, the facility representa-
tive should develop a waste management plan
or come to the meeting prepared to describe
how the industrial waste from the facility will
be managed. A waste management plan pro-
vides a starting point for public comment and
input. Keep data presentations simple and
provide information relevant to the audience.
Public speakers should be able to respond to
both general and technical questions. Also,
the facility representative should review and
be familiar with the concerns of groups or cit-
izens who have
previously
expressed an
interest in the
facility's opera-
tions. In addi-
tion, it is
important to
anticipate ques-
tions and plan
how best to
respond to these
questions at a
meeting.
1-13
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Table 1
Effective Methods for Public Notification
Methods Features Advantages Disadvantages
Briefings
Mailing of key
technical reports or
environmental
documents
News conferences
Newsletters
Newspaper inserts
Paid advertisements
News releases
Presentations to civic
and technical groups
Press kits
Advisory groups and
task forces
Personal visit or phone call to
key officials or group leaders to
announce a decision, provide
background information, or
answer questions.
Mailing technical studies or
environmental reports to other
agencies, leaders of organized
groups, or other interested parties.
Brief presentation to reporters,
followed by a question-and-
answer period, often
accompanied by handouts of
presenter's comments.
Brief description of what is going
on, usually issued at key intervals
for all people who have shown
interest.
Much like a newsletter, but
distributed as an insert in a
newspaper.
Advertising space purchased in
newspapers or on the radio or
television.
A short announcement or news
story issued to the media to get
interest in media coverage of the
story.
Deliver presentations, enhanced
with slides or overheads, to key
community groups.
A packet of information
distributed to reporters.
A group of representatives of key
interested parties is established.
Possibly a policy, technical, or
citizen advisory group.
Provides background information.
Determines reactions before an issue
"goes public." Alerts key people to
issues that might affect them.
Provides full and detailed information
to people who are most interested.
Often increases the credibility of
studies because they are fully visible.
Stimulates media interest in a story.
Direct quotations often appear in
television and radio. Might draw
attention to an announcement or
generate interest in public meetings.
Provides more information than can
be presented through the media to
those who are most interested. Often
used to provide information prior to
public meetings or key decision points.
Helps to maintain visibility during
extended technical studies.
Reaches the entire community with
important information. Is one of the
few mechanisms for reaching everyone
in the community through which you
can tell the story your way.
Effective for announcing meetings or
key decisions or as background
material for future media stories.
Might stimulate interest from the
media. Useful for announcing
meetings or major decisions or as
background material for future media
stories.
Stimulates communication with key
community groups. Can also provide
in-depth responses.
Stimulates media interest in the story.
Provides background information that
reporters can use for future stories.
Promotes communication between
key constituencies. Anticipates public
reaction to publications or decisions.
Provides a forum for reaching
consensus.
Requires time.
Costs money to print and
mail. Some people might not
read the reports.
Reporters will only come if
the announcement or presen-
tation is newsworthy. Cannot
control how the story is pre-
sented, although some direct
quotations are likely.
Requires staff time. Costs
money to prepare, print, and
mail. Stories must be objec-
tive and credible, or people
will react to the newsletters
as if they were propaganda.
Requires staff time to prepare
the insert, and distribution
costs money. Must be pre-
pared to newspapers layout
specifications.
Advertising space can be
costly. Radio and television
can entail expensive produc-
tion costs to prepare the ad.
Might be ignored or not
read. Cannot control how
the information is used.
Few disadvantages, except
some groups can be hostile.
Few disadvantages, except
cannot control how the
information is used and
might not be read.
Potential for controversy
exists if "advisory" recom-
mendations are not followed.
Requires substantial commit-
ment of staff time to provide
support to committees.
1-14
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Table 1
Effective Methods for Public Notification (cont.)
Methods Features Advantages Disadvantages
Focus groups
Telephone line
Meetings
Small discussion groups
established to give "typical"
reactions of the public.
Conducted by a professional
facilitator. Several sessions can be
conducted with different groups.
Widely advertised phone number
that handles questions or provides
centralized source of information.
Less formal meetings for people
to present positions, ask
questions, and so forth.
Provides in-depth reaction to ideas or
decisions. Good for predicting
emotional reactions
Gives people a sense that they know
whom to call. Provides a one-step
service of information. Can handle
two-way communication.
Highly legitimate forum for the public
to be heard on issues. Can be
structured to permit small group
interaction — anyone can speak.
Gets reactions, but no
knowledge of how many
people share those reactions.
Might be perceived as an
effort to manipulate the
public.
Is only as effective as the
person answering the tele-
phone. Can be expensive.
Unless a small-group discus-
sion format is used, it permits
only limited dialogue. Can
get exaggerated positions or
grandstanding. Requires staff
time to prepare for meetings.
U.S. EPA 1990. Sites for Our Solid Waste: A Guidebook for Effective Public Involvement.
State representatives also should antici-
pate and be prepared to answer questions
raised during the meeting. State representa-
tives should be prepared to answer ques-
tions on specific regulatory or compliance
issues, as well as to address how the facility
has been working in cooperation with the
state agency. The following are some ques-
tions that are often asked at meetings.
• What are the risks to me associated
with the operations?
• Who should I contact at the facility if
I have a question or concern?
• How will having the facility nearby
benefit the area?
• Will there be any noticeable day-to-
day effects on the community?
• Which processes generate industrial
waste, and what types of waste are
generated?
• How will the waste streams be treat-
ed or managed?
• What are the construction plans for
any proposed containment facilities?
• What are the intended methods for
monitoring and detecting emissions
or potential releases?
• What are the plans to address acci-
dental releases of chemicals or wastes
at the site?
• What are the plans for financial
assurance, closure, and post-closure
care?
• What are the applicable state regula-
tions?
• How long will it take to issue the
permit?
• How will the permit be issued?
• Who should I contact at the state
agency if I have questions or con-
cerns about the facility?
At the meeting, the facility representative
should invite public and state comments on
the proposed change(s), and tell community
1-15
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
members where, and to whom, they should
send written comments. A facility can choose
to respond to comments in several ways. For
example, telephone calls, additional fact
sheets, or additional meetings can all be used
to address comments. Responding promptly
to residents' comments and concerns demon-
strates an honest attempt to address them.
one-to-one. Similarly, workshops and briefin-
gs enable community members, state officials,
and facility representatives to interact, ask
questions, and learn about the activities at the
facility. Web sites can also serve as a useful
tool for facility, state, and community repre-
sentatives to share information and ask ques-
tions.
C. Make Knowledgeable
and Responsible People
Available for Sharing
Information
Having a facility representative available to
answer the public's questions and provide
information helps assure citizens that the
facility is actively listening to their concerns.
Having a state contact available to address the
public's concerns about the facility can also
make sure that concerns are being heard and
addressed.
In addition to identifying a contact person,
facilities and states should consider setting up
a telephone line staffed by employees for citi-
zens to call and obtain information promptly
about the facility. Opportunities for face-to-
face interaction between community mem-
bers and facility representatives include onsite
information offices, open houses, workshops,
or briefings.
Information
offices function
similarly to infor-
mation reposito-
ries, except that
an employee is
present to answer
questions. Open
houses are infor-
mal meetings on
site where resi-
dents can talk to
company officials
D. Provide Information
About Facility
Operations
Providing information about facility opera-
tions is an invaluable way to help the public
understand waste management activities.
Methods of informing communities include
conducting facility tours; maintaining a pub-
licly accessible information repository on site
or at a convenient offsite public building such
as a library; developing exhibits to explain
operations; and distributing information
through the publications of established orga-
nizations. Examples of public involvement
activities are presented in the following pages.
Conduct facility tours. Scheduled facility
tours allow community members and state
representatives to visit the facility and ask
questions about how it operates. By seeing a
facility first-hand, residents learn how waste
is managed and can become more confident
that it is being managed safely. Individual cit-
izens, local officials, interest groups, students,
and the media might want to take advantage
of facility tours. In planning tours, determine
the maximum number of people that can be
taken through the facility safely and think of
ways to involve tour participants in what they
are seeing, such as providing hands-on
demonstrations. It is also a good idea to have
facility representatives available to answer
technical questions in an easy-to-understand
manner.
1-16
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Maintain a publicly accessible informa-
tion repository. An information repository is
simply a collection of documents describing
the facility and its activities. It can include
background information on the facility the
partnership plan (if developed), permits to
manage waste on site, fact sheets, and copies
of relevant guidance and regulations. The
repository should be in a convenient, publicly
accessible place. Repositories are often main-
tained on site in a public "reading room" or
off site at a public library, town hall, or public
health office. Facilities should publicize the
existence, location, and hours of the reposito-
ry and update the information regularly.
Develop exhibits that explain facility
operations. Exhibits are visual displays, such
as maps, charts, diagrams, or photographs,
accompanied by brief text. They can provide
technical information in an easily under-
standable way and an opportunity to illus-
trate creatively and informatively issues of
concern. When developing exhibits, identify
the target audience, clarify which issue or
aspect of the facility's operations will be the
exhibit's focus, and determine where the
exhibit will be displayed. Public libraries,
convention halls, community events, and
shopping centers are all good, highly visible
locations for an exhibit.
Use publications and mailing lists of
established local organizations. Existing
groups and publications often provide access
to established communication networks. Take
advantage of these networks to minimize the
time and expense required to develop mailing
lists and organize meetings. Civic or environ-
mental groups, rotary clubs, religious organi-
zations, and local trade associations might
have regular meetings, newsletters, newspa-
pers, magazines, or mailing lists that could be
useful in reaching interested members of the
community.
1-17
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
American Chemistry Council's
Responsible Care®
To address citizens' concerns about the manu-
facture, transport, use, and disposal of chemical
products, the American Chemistry Council (ACC)
launched its Responsible Care® program in 1988.
To maintain their membership in ACC, companies
must participate in the Responsible Care® pro-
gram. One of the key components of the program
is recognizing and responding to community con-
cerns about chemicals and facility operations.
ACC member are committed to fostering an
open dialogue with residents of the communities in
which they are located. To do this, member compa-
nies are required to address community concerns in
two ways: (1) by developing and maintaining com-
munity outreach programs, and (2) by assuring that
each facility has an emergency response program in
place. For example, member companies provide
information about their waste minimization and
emissions reduction activities, as well as provide
convenient ways for citizens to become familiar
with the facility, such as tours. Many companies
also set up Community Advisory Panels. These
panels provide a mechanism for dialogue on issues
between plants and local communities. Companies
must also develop written emergency response
plans that include information about how to com-
municate with members of the public and consider
their needs after an emergency.
Responsible Care® is just one example of how
public involvement principles can be incorporated
into everyday business practices. The program also
shows how involving the public makes good busi-
ness sense. For more information about
Responsible Care®, contact ACC at 703 741-5000.
AF&PA's Sustainable Forestry
Initiative
Public concern about the future of America's
forests coupled with the American Forest & Paper
Association's (AF&PAS) belief that "sound environ-
mental policy and sound business practice go hand
in hand" fueled the establishment of the
Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI). Established in
1995, the SFI outlines principles and objectives for
environmental stewardship with which all AF&PA
members must comply in order to retain member-
ship. SFI encourages protecting wildlife habitat
and water quality, reforesting harvested land, and
conserving ecologically sensitive forest land. SFI
recognizes that continuous public involvement is
crucial to its ultimate goal of "ensuring that future
generations of Americans will have the same abun-
dant forests that we enjoy today."
The SFI stresses the importance of reaching out
to the public through toll-free information lines,
environmental education, private and public sector
technical assistance programs, workshops, videos,
and other means. To help keep the public
informed of achievements in sustainable forestry,
members report annually on their progress, and
AF&PA distributes the resulting publication to
interested parties. In addition, AF&PA runs two
national forums a year, which bring together log-
gers, landowners, and senior industry representa-
tives to review progress toward SFI objectives.
Many AF&PA state chapters have developed
additional activities to inform the public about the
SFI. For example, in New Hampshire, AF&PA
published a brochure about sustainable forestry
and used it to brief local sawmill officials and the
media. In Vermont, a 2-hour interactive television
session allowed representatives from industry, pub-
lic agencies, environmental organizations, the aca-
demic community, and private citizens to share
their views on sustainable forestry. Furthermore, in
West Virginia, AF&PA formed a Woodland Owner
Education Committee to reach out to nonindustrial
private landowners.
For more information about the SFI, contact
AF&PA at 800 878-8878, or visit the Web site
.
1-18
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Understanding Risk and Building
Partnerships Activity List
You should consider the following activities in understanding risk and building partnerships between
facilities, states, and community members when addressing potential waste management practices.
Q Understand the definition of risk.
Q Review sources for obtaining health benchmarks.
Q Understand the risk assessment process including the pathways and routes of potential exposure
and how to quantify or estimate exposure.
Q Be familiar with the risk assessment process for cancer risks and non-cancer risks.
Q Develop exhibits that provide a better understanding of facility operations.
Q Identify potentially interested/affected people.
Q Notify the state and public about new facilities or significant changes in facility operating plans.
Q Set up a public meeting for input from the community.
Q Provide interpreters for public meetings.
Q Make knowledgeable and responsible people available for sharing information.
Q Develop a partnership plan based on information gathered in previous steps.
Q Provide tours of the facility and information about its operations.
Q Maintain a publicly accessible information repository or onsite reading room.
Q Develop environmental risk communication skills.
1-19
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Resources
American Chemistry Council. 2001 Guide to Community Advisory Panels.
American Chemistry Council. Revised 2001. Environmental Justice and Your Community: A Plant
Manager's Introduction.
American Chemistry Council. Responsible Care® Overview Brochure.
Council in Health and Environmental Science, ENVIRON Corporation. 1986. Elements of Toxicology
and Chemical Risk Assessment.
Executive Order 12898. 1994. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-income Populations. February.
Holland, C.D., and R.S. Sielken, Jr. 1993. Quantitative Cancer Modeling and Risk Assessment.
Kolluru, Rao, Steven Bartell, et al. 1996. Risk Assessment and Management Handbook: For
Environmental, Health, and Safety Professionals.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. 1994. Final Report to the Louisiana Legislature on
Environmental Justice.
Lu, Frank C. 1996. Basic Toxicology: Fundamentals, Target Organs, and Risk Assessment.
National Research Council. 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process.
Public Participation and Accountability Subcommittee of the National Environmental Justice Advisory
Council (A Federal Advisory Committee to the U.S. EPA). 1996. The Model Plan for Public
Participation. November.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. 1993. Texas Environmental Equity and Justice Task
Force Report: Recommendations to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.
Travis, C.C. 1988. Carcinogenic Risk Assessment.
U.S. EPA. 1996a. RCRA Public Involvement Manual. EPA530-R-96-007.
1-20
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1996b. 1994 Toxics Release Inventory: Public Data Release, Executive Summary. EPA745-S-
96-001.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Decision-maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management, Second Edition. EPA530-R-95-
023.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. The Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA600-P-95-002A-E.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. EPA540-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risk for all Communities. EPA230-R-92-008A.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Sites for our Solid Waste: A Guidebook for Effective Public Involvement. EPA530-
SW-90-019.
U.S. EPA. 1989a. Chemical Releases and Chemical Risks: A Citizen's Guide to Risk Screening. EPA560-
2-89-003.
U.S. EPA. 1989b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superlund. EPA540-1-89-002.
U.S. Government Accounting Office. 1995. Hazardous and Nonhazardous Waste: Demographics ol
People Living Near Waste Facilities. GAO/RCED-95-84.
Ward, R. 1995. Environmental Justice in Louisiana: An Overview olthe Louisiana Department ol
Environmental Quality's Environmental Justice Program.
Western Center for Environmental Decision-Making. 1996. Public Involvement in Comparative Risk
Projects: Principles and Best Practices: A Source Book for Project Managers.
1-21
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Appendix
_ TSDR
CADMIUM
CAS # 7440-43-9
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ToxFAQs
June 1999
This fact sheet answers the most frequently asked health questions (FAQs) about cadmium. For more information,
call the ATSDR Information Center at 1-888-422-8737. This fact sheet is one in a series of summaries about
hazardous substances and their health effects. It's important you understand this information because this
substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on the dose, the duration,
how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are present
HIGHLIGHTS: Exposure to cadmium happens mostly in the workplace where
cadmium products are made. The general population is exposed from breathing
cigarette smoke or eating cadmium contaminated foods. Cadmium damages the
lungs, can cause kidney disease, and may irritate the digestive tract This substance
has been found in at least 776 of the 1,467 National Priorities List sites identified
by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
What is cadmium?
(Pronounced kad'me-am)
Cadmium is a natural element in the earth's crust. It is
usually found as a mineral combined with other elements such
as oxygen (cadmium oxide), chlorine (cadmium chloride), or
sulfur (cadmium sulfate, cadmium sulfide).
All soils and rocks, including coal and mineral fertilizers,
contain some cadmium. Most cadmium used in the United
States is extracted during the production of other metals like
zinc, lead, and copper. Cadmium does not corrode easily and
has many uses, including batteries, pigments, metal coatings,
and plastics.
What happens to cadmium when it enters the
environment?
q Cadmium enters air from mining, industry, and burning
coal and household wastes.
q Cadmium particles in air can travel long distances before
falling to the ground or water.
It enters water and soil from waste disposal and spills or
leaks at hazardous waste sites.
It binds strongly to soil particles.
Some cadmium dissolves in water.
q It doesn't break down in the environment, but can change
forms.
q Fish, plants, and animals take up cadmium from the envi-
ronment.
q Cadmium stays in the body a very long time and can
build up from many years of exposure to low levels.
How might I be exposed to cadmium?
q Breathing contaminated workplace air (battery manufac-
turing, metal soldering or welding).
q Eating foods containing it; low levels in all foods (high-
est in shellfish, liver, and kidney meats).
q Breathing cadmium in cigarette smoke (doubles the aver-
age daily intake).
q Drinking contaminated water.
q Breathing contaminated air near the burning of fossil
fuels or municipal waste.
How can cadmium affect my health?
Breathing high levels of cadmium severely damages the
lungs and can cause death. Eating food or drinking water with
very high levels severely irritates the stomach, leading to
vomiting and diarrhea. Long-term exposure to lower levels of
cadmium in air, food, or water leads to a buildup of cadmium
in the kidneys and possible kidney disease.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Public Health Service
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
1-22
-------
Getting Started—Understanding Risk and Building Partnerships
Page 2
CADMIUM
CAS # 7740-43-9
ToxFAQs Internet address via WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html
Other long-term effects are lung damage and fragile
bones. Animals given cadmium in food or water had high
blood pressure, iron-poor blood, liver disease, and nerve or
brain damage.
We don't know if humans get any of these diseases from
eating or drinking cadmium. Skin contact with cadmium is not
known to cause health effects in humans or animals.
How likely is cadmium to cause cancer?
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has
determined that cadmium and cadmium compounds may rea-
sonably be anticipated to be carcinogens.
How can cadmium affect children?
The health effects in children are expected to be similar to
those in adults (kidney, lung and intestinal damage).
We don't know if cadmium causes birth defects in people.
Cadmium does not readily go from a pregnant woman's body
into the developing child, but some portion can cross the pla-
centa. It can also be found in breast milk. The babies of ani-
mals exposed to high levels of cadmium during pregnancy had
changes in behavior and learning ability. Cadmium may also
affect birth weight and the skeleton in developing animals.
Animal studies also indicate that more cadmium is ab-
sorbed into the body if the diet is low in calcium, protein, or
iron, or is high in fat. A few studies show that younger animals
absorb more cadmium and are more likely to lose bone and
bone strength than adults.
How can families reduce the risk of exposure to
cadmium?
In the home, store substances that contain cadmium safely,
and keep nickel-cadmium batteries out of reach of young
children. If you work with cadmium, use all safety precautions
to avoid carrying cadmium-containing dust home from work
on your clothing, skin, hair, or tools.
A balanced diet can reduce the amount of cadmium taken
into the body from food and drink.
Is there a medical test to show whether I've been
exposed to cadmium?
Tests are available in some medical laboratories that mea-
sure cadmium in blood, urine, hair, or nails. Blood levels
show recent exposure to cadmium, and urine levels show both
recent and earlier exposure. The reliability of tests for cad-
mium levels in hair or nails is unknown.
Has the federal government made
recommendations to protect human health?
The EPA has set a limit of 5 parts of cadmium per billion
parts of drinking water (5 ppb). EPA doesn't allow cadmium in
pesticides.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limits the
amount of cadmium in food colors to 15 parts per million
(15ppm).
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) limits workplace air to 100 micrograms cadmium per
cubic meter (100 ug/m3) as cadmium fumes and 200 ug cad-
mium/m3 as cadmium dust.
Source of Information
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR). 1999. Toxicological profile for cadmium. Atlanta,
GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service.
Where can I get more information? For more information, contact the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, Division of Toxicology, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop E-29, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: 1-888-422-8737,
FAX: 404-639-6359. ToxFAQs Internet address via WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html ATSDR can tell you
where to find occupational and environmental health clinics. Their specialists can recognize, evaluate, and treat illnesses
resulting from exposure to hazardous substances. You can also contact your community or state health or environmental
quality department if you have any more questions or concerns.
Federal Recycling Program
Printed on Recycled Paper
1-23
-------
-------
Part I
Getting Started
Chapter 2
Characterizing Waste
-------
-------
Contents
I. Waste Characterization Through Process Knowledge 2 - 2
II. Waste Characterization Through Leachate Testing 2 - 3
A. Sampling and Analysis Plan 2-4
1. Representative Waste Sampling 2 - 6
2. Representative Waste Analysis 2 - 8
B. Leachate Test Selection 2 - 9
1. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) 2 - 10
2. Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) 2 - 11
3. Multiple Extraction Procedure (MEP) 2 - 12
4. Shake Extraction of Solid Waste with Water or Neutral Leaching Procedure 2 - 13
III. Waste Characterization of Volatile Organic Emissions 2 - 13
Waste Characterization Activity List 2 - 15
Resources 2-16
Appendix 2-18
-------
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Characterizing Waste
This chapter will help you:
• Understand the industrial processes that generate a waste.
• Determine the waste's physical and chemical properties.
• Estimate constituent leaching to facilitate ground-water risk analysis.
• Quantify total constituent concentrations to facilitate air emissions
analysis.
L" nderstanding the physical and
chemical properties of a waste
using sampling and analysis
techniques is the cornerstone
upon which subsequent steps in
the Guide are built. It is necessary for gauging
what risks a waste might pose to surface water,
ground water, and air and drives waste man-
agement unit design and operating decisions.
Knowing the composition of the waste is also
necessary when determining the constituents
for which to test. And, as discussed in Chapter
3-mtegrating Pollution Prevention, knowledge
of the physical and chemical properties of the
waste is crucial in identifying pollution pre-
vention opportunities.
In many instances, you can use knowledge
of waste generation processes, analytical test-
This chapter will help you address the
following questions:
• How can process knowledge be used
to characterize a waste?
• Which constituent concentrations
should be quantified?
• Which type of leachate test should be
used?
ing, or some combination of the two to esti-
mate waste generation rates and waste con-
stituent concentrations. To the extent that the
waste is not highly variable, the use of process
knowledge can be a sound approach to waste
characterization and can prove more reason-
able and cost effective than frequent sampling
of the waste. It is important to note, however,
that owners or operators using process knowl-
edge to characterize a waste in lieu of testing
are still responsible for the accuracy of their
determinations. No matter what approach is
used in characterizing a waste, the goal is to
maximize the available knowledge that is nec-
essary to make the important decisions
described in later chapters of the Guide. Also,
as changes are made to the industrial process-
es or waste management practices, it might be
necessary to recharacterize a waste in order to
accurately make waste management decisions
and evaluate risk.
In considering the use of process knowl-
edge or analytical testing, it is important to
note that the ground water and air emissions
models that accompany the Guide use con-
stituent concentrations to estimate risk. Input
requires specific concentrations which cannot
be precisely estimated solely by knowledge of
the processes that generate the waste. Further,
when wastes are placed in a waste manage-
ment unit, such as a landfill or surface
2-1
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
impoundment, they are subjected to various
physical, chemical, and biological processes
that can result in the creation of new com-
pounds in the waste, changes in the mass and
volume of the waste, and the creation of dif-
ferent phases within the waste and within the
landfill or impoundment. In order to accu-
rately predict the concentration of the conta-
minants in the leachate, these changes must
be accounted for.
Accurate waste management unit con-
stituent characterization is also necessary for
input to the modeling tools provided in the
Guide. Because model input requires specific
data, model output will be based on the accu-
racy of the data input. Process knowledge
alone (unless based on previous testing) might
not be sufficiently accurate to yield reliable
results. Leachate testing (discussed later in
this chapter), for example, will likely give you
a more precise assessment of waste con-
stituent concentrations than process knowl-
edge. Also note that whether you are using
process knowledge, testing, or a combination
of both, sources of model input data must be
well documented so that an individual evalu-
ating the modeling results understands the
background supporting the assessment.
I. Waste
Characterization
Through Process
Knowledge
A waste characterization begins with an
understanding of the industrial processes that
generate a waste. You must obtain enough
information about the process to enable
proper characterization of the waste, for
example, by reviewing process flow diagrams
or plans and determining all inputs and out-
puts. You should also be familiar with other
waste characteristics such as the physical
state of the waste, the volume of waste pro-
duced, and the general composition of the
waste. In addition, many industries have
thoroughly tested and characterized their
wastes over time, therefore it might be benefi-
cial to contact your trade association to deter-
mine if waste characterizations have already
been performed and are available for process-
es similar to yours. Additional resources can
assist in waste characterization by providing
information on waste constituents and poten-
tial concentrations. Some examples include:
• Chemical engineering designs or
plans for the process, showing
process input chemicals, expected
primary and secondary chemical
reactions, and products.
• Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs)
for materials involved. (Note that not
all MSDSs contain information on all
constituents found in a product.)
• Manufacturer's literature.
• Previous waste analyses.
• Literature on similar processes.
• Preliminary testing results, if available.
A material balance exercise using process
knowledge can be useful in understanding
where wastes are generated within a process
and in estimating concentrations of waste con-
stituents particularly where analytical test data
2-2
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
are limited. In a material balance, all input
streams, such as raw materials fed into the
processes, and all output streams, such as
products produced and waste generated, are
calculated. Flow diagrams can be used to iden-
tify important process steps and sources where
wastes are generated. Characterizing wastes
using material balances can require consider-
able effort and expense, but can help you to
develop a more complete picture of the waste
generation process(es) involved.
Note that a thorough assessment of your
production processes can also serve as the
starting point for facility-wide waste reduc-
tion, recycling, or pollution prevention
efforts. Such an assessment will provide the
information base to explore many opportuni-
ties to reduce or recycle the volume or toxici-
ty of wastes. Refer to Chapter 3-Integrating
Pollution Prevention for ideas, tools, and ref-
erences on how to proceed.
While the use of process knowledge is
attractive because of the cost savings associat-
ed with using existing information, you must
ensure that this information accurately char-
acterizes your wastes. If using process
descriptions, published data, and document-
ed studies to determine waste characteristics,
the data should be scrutinized carefully to
determine if there are any differences between
the processes in the studies and the waste
generating process at your facility, that the
studies are acceptable and accurate (i.e.,
based on valid sampling and analytical tech-
niques), and that the information is current.
If there are discrepancies, or if you begin a
new process or change any of the existing
processes at your facility (so that the docu-
mented studies and published data are no
longer applicable), you are encouraged to
consider performing additional sampling and
laboratory analysis to accurately characterize
the waste and ensure proper management.
Also, if process knowledge is used in addition
What is process
knowledge?
Process knowledge refers to detailed
information on processes that generate
wastes. It can be used to partly, or in
many cases completely, characterize
waste to ensure proper management.
Process knowledge includes:
• Existing published or documented
waste analysis data or studies con-
ducted on wastes generated by
processes similar to that which gener-
ated the waste.
• Waste analysis data obtained from
other facilities in the same industry.
• Facility's records of previously per-
formed analyses.
to, or in place of, sampling and analysis, you
should clearly document the information
used in your characterization assessment to
demonstrate to regulatory agencies, the pub-
lic, and other interested parties that the infor-
mation accurately and completely
characterizes the waste. The source of this
information should be clearly documented.
II. Waste
Characterization
Through
Leachate Testing
Although sampling and laboratory analysis
is not as economical and might not be as
convenient as using process knowledge, it
does have advantages. The resulting data usu-
ally provide the most accurate information
available on constituent concentration levels.
2-3
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Incomplete or mis-characterization of waste
can lead to improper waste management, inac-
curate modeling outputs, or erroneous deci-
sions concerning the type of unit to be used,
liner selection, or choice of land application
methods. Note that process knowledge allows
you to eliminate unnecessary or redundant
waste testing by helping you focus on which
constituents to measure in the waste. Again,
thorough documentation of both the process
knowledge used (e.g., studies, published data),
as well as the analytical data is important.
The intent of leachate and extraction testing
is to estimate the leaching potential of con-
stituents of concern to water sources. It is
important to estimate leaching potential in
order to accurately estimate the quantity of
chemicals that could potentially reach ground-
or surface-water resources (e.g., drinking
water supply wells, waters used for recre-
ation). The Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model (IWEM) developed for the
Guide uses expected leachate concentrations
for the waste management units as the basis
for liner system design recommendations.
Leachate tests will allow you to accurately
quantify the input terms for modeling.
If the total concentration of all the con-
stituents in a waste has been estimated using
process knowledge (which could include pre-
vious testing data on wastes known to be very
similar), estimates of the maximum possible
concentration of these constituents in leachate
can be made using the dilution ratio of the
leachate test to be performed.
For example, the Toxicity Characteristic
Leachate Procedure (TCLP) allows for a total
constituent analysis in lieu of performing the
test for some wastes. If a waste is 100 percent
solid, as defined by the TCLP method, then
the results of the total compositional analysis
may be divided by twenty to convert the total
results into the maximum leachable concentra-
tion1. This factor is derived from the 20:1 liq-
uid to solid ratio employed in the TCLP. This
is a conservative approach to estimating
leachate concentrations and does not factor in
environmental influences, such as rainfall. If a
waste has filterable liquid, then the concentra-
tion of each phase (liquid and solid) must be
determined. The following equation may be
used to calculate this value:2
(v^Q) + (v2)(c2)
20V2
Where:
V1 = Volume of the first phase (L)
G! = Concentration of the analyte of con-
cern in the first phase (mg/L)
V2 = Volume of the second phase (L)
C2 = Concentration of the analyte of con-
cern in the second phase (mg/L)
Because this is only a screening method for
identifying an upper-bound TCLP leachate
concentration, you should consult with your
state or local regulatory agency to determine
whether process knowledge can be used to
accurately estimate maximum risk in lieu of
leachate testing.
A. Sampling and Analysis
Plan
One of the more critical elements in proper
waste characterization is the plan for sampling
and analyzing the waste. The sampling plan is
usually a written document that describes the
objectives and details of the individual tasks of
2-4
This method is only appropriate for estimating maximum constituent concentration in leachate for non-
liquid wastes (e.g., those wastes not discharged to a surface impoundment). For surface impoundments,
the influent concentration of heavy metals can be assumed to be the maximum theoretical concentration
of metals in the leachate for purposes of input to the ground-water modeling tool that accompanies this
document. To estimate the leachate concentration of organic constituents in liquid wastes for modeling
input, you will need to account for losses occurring within the surface impoundment before you can esti-
mate the concentration in the leachate (i.e., an effluent concentration must be determined for organics).
Source: Office of Solid Waste Web site at .
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
a sampling effort and how they will be per-
formed. This plan should be carefully thought
out, well in advance of sampling. The more
detailed the sampling plan, the less opportu-
nity for error or misunderstanding during
sampling, analysis, and data interpretation.
To ensure that the sampling plan is
designed properly, a wide range of personnel
should be consulted. It is important that the
following individuals are involved in the
development of the sampling plan to ensure
that the results of the sampling effort are pre-
cise and accurate enough to properly charac-
terize the waste:
• An engineer who understands the
manufacturing processes.
• An experienced member of the sam-
pling team.
• The end user of the data.
• A senior analytical chemist.
• A statistician.
• A quality assurance representative.
It is also advisable that you consult the
analytical laboratory to be used when devel-
oping your sampling plan.
Background information on the processes
that generate the waste and the type and
characteristics of the waste management unit
is essential for developing a sound sampling
plan. Knowledge of the unit location and sit-
uation (e.g., geology, exposure of the waste to
the elements, local climatic conditions) will
assist in determining correct sample size and
sampling method. Sampling plan design will
depend on whether you are sampling a waste
prior to disposal in a waste management unit
or whether you are sampling waste from an
existing unit. When obtaining samples from
an existing unit, care should be taken to
avoid endangering the individuals collecting
the samples and to prevent damaging the unit
itself. Reasons for obtaining samples from an
existing unit include, characterizing the waste
in the unit to determine if the new waste
being added is compatible, checking to see if
the composition of the waste is changing over
time due to various chemical and biological
breakdown processes, or characterizing the
waste in the unit or the leachate from the
unit to give an indication of expected concen-
trations in leachate from a new unit.
The sampling plan must be correctly
defined and organized in order to get an
accurate estimation of the characteristics of
the waste. Both an appropriate sample size
and proper sampling techniques are neces-
sary. If the sampling process is carried out
correctly, the sample will be representative
and the estimates it generates will be useful
for making decisions concerning proper man-
agement of the waste and for assessing risk.
In developing a sampling plan, accuracy is
of primary concern. The goal of sampling is to
get an accurate estimate of the waste's charac-
teristics from measuring the sample's charac-
teristics. The main controlling factor in
deciding whether the estimates will be accu-
rate is how representative the sample is (dis-
cussed in the following section). Using a small
sample increases the possibility that the sam-
ple will not be representative, but a sample
that is larger than the minimum calculated
sample size does not necessarily increase the
probability of getting a representative sample.
As you are developing the sampling plan, you
should address the following considerations:
• Data quality objectives.
• Determination of a representative
sample.
• Statistical methods to be employed in
the analyses.
• Waste generation and handling
processes.
2-5
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
• Constituents/parameters to be sampled.
• Physical and chemical properties of
the waste.
• Accessibility of the unit.
• Sampling equipment, methods, and
sample containers.
• Quality assurance and quality control
(e.g., sample preservation and han-
dling requirements).
• Chain-of-custody
• Health and safety of employees.
Many of these considerations are discussed
below. Additional information on data quality
objectives and quality assurance and quality
control can be found in Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods—SW-846 (U.S. EPA, 1996e), Guidance
for the Data Quality Objectives Process (U.S.
EPA, 1996b), Guidance on Quality Assurance
Project Plans (U.S. EPA, 1998a), and Guidance
for the Data Quality Assessment: Practical
Methods for Data Analysis (U.S. EPA, 1996a).3
A determination as to the constituents that
will be measured can be based on process
knowledge to narrow the focus and expense
of performing the analyses. Analyses should
be performed for those constituents that are
reasonably expected to be in the waste at
detectable levels (i.e., test method detection
levels). Note that the Industrial Waste
Management Evaluation Model (IWEM) that
accompanies this document recommends
liner system designs, if necessary, or the
appropriateness of land application based on
calculated protective leachate thresholds
(Leachate Concentration Threshold Values or
LCTVs) for various constituents that are like-
ly to be found in industrial waste and pose
hazards at certain levels to people and the
environment. The constituents that are evalu-
ated are listed in Table 1.2 of the Industrial
Waste Management Evaluation Model Technical
Background Document (U.S. EPA 2002). The
LCTV tables also are included in the IWEM
Technical Background Document and the model
on the CD-ROM version of this Guide, and
can be used as a starting point to help you
determine which constituents to measure. It
is not recommended that you sample for all
of the organic chemicals and metals listed in
the tables, but rather use these tables as a
guide in conjunction with knowledge con-
cerning the waste generating practices to
determine which constituents to measure.
1. Representative Waste
Sampling
The first step in any analytical testing
process is to obtain a sample that is represen-
tative of the physical and chemical composi-
tion of a waste. The term "representative
sample" is commonly used to denote a sample
that has the same properties and composition
in the same proportions as the population
from which it was collected. Finding one sam-
ple which is representative of the entire waste
can be difficult unless you are dealing with a
homogenous waste. Because most industrial
wastes are not homogeneous, many different
factors should be considered in obtaining
samples. Examples of some of the factors that
should be considered include:
• Physical state of the waste. The
physical state of the waste affects
most aspects of a sampling effort. The
sampling device will vary according
to whether the sample is liquid, solid,
gas, or multiphasic. It will also vary
according to whether the liquid is
viscous or free-flowing, or whether
the solid is hard, soft, powdery,
monolithic, or clay-like.
• Composition of the waste. The
samples should represent the average
concentration and variability of the
waste in time or over space.
2-6
3 These and other EPA publications can be found at the National Environmental Publications Internet
site (NEPIS) at .
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
• Waste generation and han-
dling processes. Processes to
consider include: if the waste
is generated in batches; if
there is a change in the raw
materials used in a manufac-
turing process; if waste com-
position can vary substantially
as a function of process tem-
peratures or pressures; and if
storage time affects the waste's
characteristics/composition.
• Transitory events. Start-up,
shut-down, slow-down, and
maintenance transients can
result in the generation of a
waste that is not representative
of the normal waste stream. If
a sample was unknowingly
collected at one of these inter-
vals, incorrect conclusions
could be drawn.
You should consult with your state or
local regulatory agency to identify any
legal requirements or preferences before
initiating sampling efforts. Refer to
Chapter 9 of the EPA's SW-846 test
methods document (see side bar) for
detailed guidance on planning, imple-
menting, and assessing sampling events.
To ensure that the chemical infor-
mation obtained from waste sampling
efforts is accurate, it must be unbiased
and sufficiently precise. Accuracy is
usually achieved by incorporating
some form of randomness into the
sample selection process and by select-
ing an appropriate number of samples.
Since most industrial wastes are het-
erogeneous in terms of their chemical
properties, unbiased samples and
appropriate precision can usually be
achieved by simple random sampling.
In this type of sampling, all units in
the population (essentially all locations
More information on Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods—SW-846
EPA has begun replacing requirements mandat-
ing the use of specific measurement methods or
technologies with a performance-based measure-
ment system (PBMS). The goal of PBMS is to
reduce regulatory burden and foster the use of
innovative and emerging technologies or meth-
ods. The PBMS establishes what needs to be
accomplished, but does not prescribe specifically
how to do it. In a sampling situation, for exam-
ple, PBMS would establish the data needs, the
level of uncertainty acceptable for making deci-
sions, and the required supporting documenta-
tion; a specific test method would not be
prescribed. This approach allows the analyst the
flexibility to select the most appropriate and cost
effective test methods or technologies to comply
with the criteria. Under PBMS, the analyst is
required to demonstrate the accuracy of the mea-
surement method using the specific matrix that is
being analyzed. SW-846 serves only as a guidance
document and starting point for determining
which test method to use.
SW-846 provides state-of-the-art analytical test
methods for a wide array of inorganic and organic
constituents, as well as procedures for field and
laboratory quality control, sampling, and charac-
teristics testing. The methods are intended to pro-
mote accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision,
and comparability of analyses and test results.
For assistance with the methods described in SW-
846, call the EPA Method Information
Communication Exchange (MICE) Hotline at 703
676-4690 or send an e-mail to mice@cpmx.saic.com.
The text of SW-846 is available online at:
. A hard copy
or CD-ROM version of SW-846 can be purchased
by calling the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS) at 800 553-6847.
2-7
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
or points in all batches of waste from which a
sample could be collected) are identified, and
a suitable number of samples is randomly
selected from the population.
The appropriate number of samples to
employ in a waste characterization is at least
the minimum number of samples required to
generate a precise estimate of the true mean
concentration of a chemical contaminant in a
waste. A number of mathematical formulas
exist for determining the appropriate number
of samples depending on the statistical preci-
sion required. Further information on sam-
pling designs and methods for calculating
required sample sizes and optimal distribu-
tion of samples can be found in Gilbert
(1987), Winer (1971), and Cochran (1977)
and Chapter 9 of EPA SW-846.
The type of sampling plan developed will
vary depending on the sampling location.
Solid wastes contained in a landfill or waste
pile can be best sampled using a three-
dimensional random sampling strategy. This
involves establishing an imaginary three-
dimensional grid or sampling points in the
waste and then using random-number tables
or random-number generators to select points
for sampling. Hollow-stem augers combined
with split-spoon samplers are frequently
appropriate for sampling landfills.
If the distribution of waste components is
known or assumed for liquid or semi-solid
wastes in surface impoundments, then a two-
dimensional simple random sampling strategy
might be appropriate. In this strategy, the top
surface of the waste is divided into an imagi-
nary grid and grid sections are selected using
random-number tables or random-number
generators. Each selected grid point is then
sampled in a vertical manner along the entire
length from top to bottom using a sampling
device such as a weighted bottle, a drum
thief, or Coliwasa.
If sampling is restricted, the sampling strat-
egy should, at a minimum, take sufficient
samples to address the potential vertical varia-
tions in the waste in order to be considered
representative. This is because contained
wastes tend to display vertical, rather than
horizontal, non-random heterogeneity due to
settling or the layering of solids and denser
liquid phases. Also, care should be taken
when performing representative sampling of a
landfill, waste pile, or surface impoundment
to minimize any potential to create hazardous
conditions. (It is possible that the improper
use of intrusive sampling techniques, such as
the use of augers, could accelerate leaching by
creating pathways or tunnels that can acceler-
ate leachate movement to ground water.)
To facilitate characterization efforts, consult
with state and local regulatory agencies and a
qualified professional to select a sampling plan
and determine the appropriate number of sam-
ples, before beginning sampling efforts. You
should also consider conducting a detailed
waste-stream specific characterization so that
the information can be used to conduct waste
reduction and waste minimization activities.
Additional information concerning sam-
pling plans, strategies, methods, equipment,
and sampling quality assurance and quality
control is available in Chapters 9 and 10 of the
SW-846 test methods document. Electronic
versions of these chapters have been included
on the CD-ROM version of the Guide.
2. Representative Waste Analysis
After a representative sample has been col-
lected, it must be properly preserved to main-
tain the physical and chemical properties that
it possessed at the time of collection. Sample
types, sample containers, container prepara-
tion, and sample preservation methods are
critical for maintaining the integrity of the
sample and obtaining accurate results.
Preservation and holding times are also
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
important factors to consider and will vary
depending on the type of constituents being
measured (e.g., VOCs, heavy metals, hydro-
carbons) and the waste matrix (e.g., solid,
liquid, semi-solid).
The analytical chemist then develops an
analytical plan which is appropriate for the
sample to be analyzed, the constituents to be
analyzed, and the end use of the information
required. The laboratory should have standard
operating procedures available for review for
the various types of analyses to be performed
and for all associated methods needed to com-
plete each analysis, such as instrument main-
tenance procedures, sample handling
procedures, and sample documentation proce-
dures. In addition, the laboratory should have
a laboratory quality assurance/quality control
statement available for review which includes
all key personnel qualifications.
The SW-846 document contains informa-
tion on analytical plans and methods.
Another useful source of information regard-
ing the selection of analytical methods and
quality assurance/quality control procedures
for various compounds is the Office of Solid
Waste Methods Team home page at
.
B. Leachate Test Selection
Leaching tests are used to estimate poten-
tial concentration or amount of waste con-
stituents that can leach from a waste to
ground water. Typical leaching tests use a
specified leaching fluid mixed with the solid
portion of a waste for a specified time. Solids
are then separated from the leaching solution
and the solution is tested for waste con-
stituent concentrations. The type of leaching
test performed can vary depending on the
chemical, biological, and physical characteris-
tics of the waste; the environment in which
the waste will be placed; as well as the rec-
ommendations or requirements of your state
and local regulatory agencies.
When selecting the most appropriate ana-
lytical tests, consider at a minimum the phys-
ical state of the sample, the constituents to be
analyzed, detection limits, and the specified
holding times of the analytical methods.4 It
might not be cost-effective or useful to con-
duct a test with detection limits at or greater
than the constituent concentrations in a
waste. Process knowledge can help you pre-
dict whether the concentrations of certain
constituents are likely to fall below the detec-
tion limits for anticipated methods.
After assessing the state of the waste, assess
the environment of the waste management
unit in which the waste will be placed. For
example, an acidic environment might
require a different test than a non-acidic envi-
ronment in order to best reflect the condi-
tions under which the waste will actually
leach. If the waste management unit is a
monofill, then the characteristics of the waste
will determine most of the unit's conditions.
Conversely, if many different wastes are being
co-disposed, then the conditions created by
Which leaching test is
appropriate?
Selecting an appropriate leachate test
can be summarized in the following four
steps:
1. Assess the physical state of the waste
using process knowledge.
2. Assess the environment in which the
waste will be placed.
3. Consult with your state and/or local
regulatory agency.
4. Select an appropriate leachate test
based on the above information.
There are several general categories of phases in which samples can be categorized: solids, aqueous,
sludges, multiphase samples, ground water, and oil and organic liquid. You should select a test that is
designed for the specific sample type.
2-9
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
the co-disposed wastes must be considered,
including the constituents that can be leached
by the subject waste.
A qualified laboratory should always be used
when conducting analytical testing. The labora-
tory can be in-house or independent. When
using independent laboratories, ensure that
they are qualified and competent to perform
the required tests. Some laboratories might be
proficient in one test but not another. You
should consult with the laboratory before final-
izing your test selection to make certain that
the test can be performed. When using analyti-
cal tests that are not frequently performed,
additional quality assurance and quality control
practices might need to be implemented to
ensure that the tests are conducted correctly
and that the results are accurate.
A brief summary of the TCLP and three
other commonly used leachate tests is provid-
ed below (procedures for the EPA test meth-
ods are included in SW-846 and for the
ASTM method in the Annual Book ofASTM
Standards}. These summaries are provided as
background and are not meant to imply that
these are the only tests that can be used to
accurately predict leachate potential. Other
leachate tests have been developed and might
be suitable for testing your waste. The table
in the appendix at the end of this chapter
provides a summary of over 20 leachate tests
that have been designed to estimate the
potential for contaminant release, including
several developed by ASTM.5 You should con-
sult with state and local regulatory agencies
and/or a laboratory that is familiar with
leachate testing methods to identify the most
appropriate test and test method procedures
for your waste and sample type.
1. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP)
The TCLP6 is the test method used to deter-
mine whether a waste is hazardous due to its
characteristics as defined in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 40
CFR Part 261. The TCLP estimates the leacha-
bility of certain toxicity characteristic hazardous
constituents from solid waste under a defined
set of laboratory conditions. It evaluates the
leaching of metals, volatile and semi-volatile
organic compounds, and pesticides from
wastes. The TCLP was developed to simulate
the leaching of constituents into ground water
under conditions found in municipal solid
waste (MSW) landfills. The TCLP does not sim-
ulate the release of contaminants to non-ground
water pathways. The TCLP is most commonly
used by EPA, state, and local agencies to classify
waste. It is also used to determine compliance
with some land disposal restrictions (LDRs) for
hazardous wastes. The TCLP can be found as
EPA Method 1311 in SW-846.7 A copy of
Method 1311 has been included on the CD-
ROM version of the Guide.
For liquid wastes, (i.e., those containing
less than 0.5 percent dry solid material) the
waste after filtration through a glass fiber fil-
2-10
EPA has only reviewed and evaluated those test methods found in SW-846. The EPA has not reviewed
or evaluated the other test methods and cannot recommend use of any test methods other than those
found in SW-846.
EPA is undertaking a review of the TCLP test and how it is used to evaluate waste leaching (described
in the Phase IV Land Disposal Restrictions rulemaking, 62 Federal Register 25997; May 26, 1998). EPA
anticipates that this review will examine the effects of a number of factors on leaching and on
approaches to estimating the likely leaching of a waste in the environment. These factors include pH,
liquid to solid ratios, matrix effects and physical form of the waste, effects of non-hazardous salts on
the leachability of hazardous metal salts, and others. The effects of these factors on leaching might or
might not be well reflected in the leaching tests currently available. At the conclusion of the TCLP
review, EPA is likely to issue revisions to this guidance that reflect a more complete understanding of
waste constituent leaching under a variety of management conditions.
The TCLP was developed to replace the Extraction Procedure Toxicity Test method which is designated
as EPA Method 1310 in SW-846.
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
ter is defined as the TCLP extractant. The
concentrations of constituents in the liquid
extract are then determined.
For wastes containing greater than or equal
to 0.5 percent solids, the liquid, if any, is sep-
arated from the solid phase and stored for
later analysis. The solids must then be
reduced to particle size, if necessary. The
solids are extracted with an acetate buffer
solution. A liquid-to-solid ratio of 20:1 by
weight is used for an extraction period of 18
± 2 hours. After extraction, the solids are fil-
tered from the liquid through a glass fiber fil-
ter and the liquid extract is combined with
any original liquid fraction of the wastes.
Analyses are then conducted on the liquid fil-
trate/leachate to determine the constituent
concentrations.
To determine if a waste is hazardous
because it exhibits the toxicity characteristic
(TC), the TCLP method is used to generate
leachate under controlled conditions as dis-
cussed above. If the TCLP liquid extract con-
tains any of the constituents listed in Table 1
of 40 CFR Part 261 at a concentration equal
to or greater than the respective value in the
table, the waste is considered to be a TC haz-
ardous waste, unless exempted or excluded
under Part 261. Although the TCLP test was
designed to determine if a waste is hazardous,
the importance of its use for waste characteri-
zation as discussed in this chapter is to
understand the parameters to be considered
in properly managing the wastes.
You should check with state and local reg-
ulatory agencies to determine whether the
TCLP is likely to be the best test for evaluat-
ing the leaching potential of a waste or if
another test might better predict leaching
under the anticipated waste management
conditions. Because the test was developed by
EPA to determine if a waste is hazardous
(according to 40 CFR 261.24) and focused
on simulating leaching of solid wastes placed
in a municipal landfill, this test might not be
appropriate for your waste because the leach-
ing potential for the same chemical can be
quite different depending on a number of fac-
tors. These factors include the characteristics
of the leaching fluid, the form of the chemical
in the solids, the waste matrix, and the dis-
posal conditions.
Although the TCLP is the most commonly
used leachate test for estimating the actual
leaching potential of wastes, you should not
automatically default to it in all situations or
conditions and for all types of wastes. While
the TCLP test might be conservative under
some conditions (i.e., overestimates leaching
potential), it might underestimate leaching
under other extreme conditions. In a landfill
that has primarily alkaline conditions, the
TCLP is not likely to be the optimal method
because the TCLP is designed to replicate
leaching in an acidic environment. For mate-
rials that pose their greatest hazard when
exposed to alkaline conditions (e.g., metals
such as arsenic and antimony), use of the
TCLP might underestimate the leaching
potential. When the conditions of your waste
management unit are very different from the
conditions that the TCLP test simulates,
another test might be more appropriate.
Further, the TCLP might not be appropriate
for analyzing oily wastes. Oil phases can be
difficult to separate (e.g., it might be impossi-
ble to separate solids from oil), oily material
can obstruct the filter (often resulting in an
underestimation of constituents in the
leachate), and oily materials can yield both
oil and aqueous leachate which must be ana-
lyzed separately8
2. Synthetic Precipitation
Leaching Procedure (SPLP)
The SPLP (designated as EPA Method 1312
in SW-846) is currently used by several state
agencies to evaluate the leaching of con-
SW-846 specifies several procedures that should be followed when analyzing oily wastes.
2-11
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
stituents from wastes. The SPLP was designed
to estimate the leachability of both organic
and inorganic analytes present in liquids, soils,
and wastes. The SPLP was originally designed
to assess how clean a soil was under EPA's
Clean Closure Program. Even though the fed-
eral hazardous waste program, did not adopt
it for use, the test can still estimate releases
from wastes placed in a landfill and subject to
acid rain. There might be, however, important
differences between soil as a constituent
matrix (for which the SPLP is primarily used)
and the matrix of a generated industrial waste.
A copy of Method 1312 has been included on
the CD-ROM version of the Guide.
The SPLP is very similar to the TCLP
Method 1311. Waste samples containing
solids and liquids are handled by separating
the liquids from the solid phase, and then
reducing solids to particle size. The solids are
then extracted with a dilute sulfuric
acid/nitric acid solution. A liquid-to-solid
ratio of 20:1 by weight is used for an extrac-
tion period of 18±2 hours. After extraction,
the solids are filtered from the liquid extract
and the liquid extract is combined with any
original liquid fraction of the wastes.
Analyses are then conducted on the liquid fil-
trate/leachate to determine the constituent
concentrations.
The sulfuric acid/nitric acid extraction
solution used in the SPLP was selected to
simulate leachate generation, in part, from
acid rain. Also note that in both the SPLP
and TCLP, some paint and oily wastes might
clog the filters used to separate the liquid
extract from the solids prior to analysis,
resulting in under reporting of the extractable
constituent concentrations.
3. Multiple Extraction Procedure
(MEP)
The MEP (designated as EPA Method 1320
in SW-846) was designed to simulate the
leaching that a waste will undergo from repeti-
tive precipitation of acid rain on a landfill to
determine the highest concentration of each
constituent that is likely to leach in a real
world environment. Currently, the MEP is used
in EPA's hazardous waste delisting program. A
copy of Method 1320 has been included on
the CD-ROM version of the Guide.
The MEP can be used to evaluate liquid,
solid, and multiphase samples. Waste sam-
ples are extracted according to the Extraction
Procedure (EP) Toxicity Test (Method 1310
of SW-846). The EP test is also very similar
to the TCLP Method 1311. A copy of Method
1310 has been included on the CD- ROM
version of the Guide.
In the MEP, liquid wastes are filtered
through a glass fiber filter prior to testing.
Waste samples containing both solids and liq-
uids are handled by separating the liquids
from the solid phase, and then reducing the
solids to particle size. The solids are then
extracted using an acetic acid solution. A liq-
uid- to-solid ratio of 16:1 by weight is used
for an extraction period of 24 hours. After
extraction, the solids are filtered from the liq-
uid extract, and the liquid extract is combined
with any original liquid fraction of the waste.
The solids portion of the sample that
remains after application of Method 1310 are
then re-extracted using a dilute sulfuric
acid/nitric acid solution. As in the SPLP, this
acidic solution was selected to simulate
2-12
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
leachate generation, in part, from acid rain.
This time a liquid-to-solid ratio of 20:1 by
weight is used for an extraction period of 24
hours. After extraction, the solids are once
again filtered from the liquid extract, and the
liquid extract is combined with any original
liquid fraction of the waste.
These four steps are repeated eight addi-
tional times. If the concentration of any con-
stituent of concern increases from the 7th or
8th extraction to the 9th extraction, the pro-
cedure is repeated until these concentrations
decrease.
The MEP is intended to simulate 1,000
years of freeze and thaw cycles and prolonged
exposure to a leaching medium. One advan-
tage of the MEP over the TCLP is that the
MEP gradually removes excess alkalinity in
the waste. Thus, the leaching behavior of
metal contaminants can be evaluated as a
function of decreasing pH, which increases
the solubility of most metals.
4. Shake Extraction of Solid
Waste with Water or Neutral
Leaching Procedure
The Shake Extraction of Solid Waste with
Water, or the Neutral Leaching Procedure,
was developed by the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) to assess the
leaching potential of solid waste and has been
designated as ASTM D-3987-85. This test
method provides for the shaking of an extrac-
tant (e.g., water) and a known weight of
waste of specified composition to obtain an
aqueous phase for analysis after separation.
The intent of this test method is for the final
pH of the extract to reflect the interaction of
the liquid extractant with the buffering capac-
ity of the solid waste.
The shake test is performed by mixing the
solid sample with test water and agitating
continuously for 18±0.25 hours. A liquid-to-
solid ratio of 20:1 by weight is used. After
agitation the solids are filtered from the liquid
extract, and the liquid is analyzed.
The water extraction is meant to simulate
conditions where the solid waste is the domi-
nant factor in determining the pH of the
extract. This test, however, has only been
approved for certain inorganic constituents,
and is not applicable to organic substances
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). A
copy of this procedure can be ordered by
calling ASTM at 610 832-9585 or online at
.
Waste
Characterization
of Volatile
Organic
Emissions
To determine whether volatile organic
emissions are of concern at a waste manage-
ment unit, determine the concentration of the
VOCs that are reasonably expected to be
emitted. Process knowledge is likely to be
less accurate for determining VOCs than
measured values. As discussed earlier in this
chapter, modeling results for waste manage-
ment units will only be as accurate as the
input data. Therefore, sampling and analytical
testing might be necessary if organic concen-
trations cannot be estimated confidently
using process knowledge.
Table 2 in Chapter 5-Protecting Air Quality
can be used as a starting point to help you
determine which air emissions constituents to
measure. It is not recommended that you
sample for all of the volatile organics listed in
Table 2, but rather use Table 2 as a guide in
conjunction with process knowledge to nar-
row the sampling effort and thereby minimize
2-13
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
unnecessary sampling costs. A thorough
understanding of process knowledge can help
you determine what is reasonably expected to
be in the waste, so that it is not necessary to
sample for unspecified constituents.
Many tests have been developed for quan-
titatively extracting volatile and semi-volatile
organic constituents from various sample
matrices. These tests tend to be highly
dependent upon the physical characteristics
of the sample. You should consult with state
and local regulatory agencies before imple-
menting testing. You can refer to SW-846
Method 3500B for guidance on the selection
of methods for quantitative extraction or
dilution of samples for analysis by one of the
volatile or semi-volatile determinative meth-
ods. After performing the appropriate extrac-
tion procedure, further cleanup of the sample
extract might be necessary if analysis of the
extract is prevented due to interferences
coextracted from the sample. Method 3600
of SW-846 provides additional guidance on
cleanup procedures.
Following sample preparation, a sample is
ready for further analysis. Most analytical
methods use either gas chromatography
(GC), high performance liquid chromatogra-
phy (HPLC), gas chromatography/mass spec-
trometry (GC/MS), or high performance
liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
(HPLC/MS). SW-846 is designed to allow the
methods to be mixed and matched, so that
sample preparation, sample cleanup, and
analytical methods can be properly
sequenced for the particular analyte and
matrix. Again, you should consult with state
and local regulatory agencies before finalizing
the selected methodology.
2-14
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Waste Characterization Activity List
To determine constituent concentrations in a waste you should:
Q Assess the physical state of the waste using process knowledge.
Q Use process knowledge to identify constituents for further analysis.
Q Assess the environment in which the waste will be placed.
Q Consult with state and local regulatory agencies to determine any specific testing requirements.
Q Select an appropriate leachate test or organic constituent analysis based on the above information.
2-15
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Resources
ASTM. 1995. Annual Book ol ASTM Standards.
ASTM. Standard Methods for Examination ol Water and Wastewater.
ASTM. D-3987-85. Standard Test Method lor Shake Extraction ol Solid Waste with Water
California EPA. Handbook lor the Analysis and Classification ol Wastes.
California EPA. 1995. Preliminary Proposal to Require the TCLP in Lieu olthe Waste Extraction
Test. Memorandum to James Carlisle, Department ol Toxics Substances Control, from Jon
Marshack, California Regional Water Quality Control Board. December 18.
California EPA. 1994. Regulation Guidance: When Extraction Tests are Not Necessary.
California EPA. 1994. Regulation Guidance: TCLP vs. WET.
California EPA. 1993. Regulation Guidance: Lab Methods.
California EPA. 1993. Regulation Guidance: Sell-Classification.
Cochran, WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dusing, D.C., Bishop, PL., and Keener, T.C. 1992. Effect olRedox Potential on Leaching from
Stabilized/Solidified Waste Materials. Journal ol Air and Waste Management Association. 42:56.
January.
Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods lor Environmental Pollution Monitoring. New York: Van
Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Kendall, Douglas. 1996. Impermanence ollron Treatment ol Lead-Contaminated Foundry Sand—
NIBCO, Inc., Nacogdoches, Texas. National Enforcement Investigations Center Project PA9. April.
Kosson, D.S., H.A. van der Sloot, F. Sanchez, and A.C. Garrabrants. 2002. An Integrated
Framework lor Evaluating Leaching in Waste Management and Utilization ol Secondary Materials.
Environmental Engineering Science, In-press.
New Jersey Department ol Environmental Protection. 1996. Industrial Pollution Prevention Trends
in New Jersey.
2-16
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Resources (cont.)
Northwestern University. 1995. Chapter 4—Evaluation ol Procedures for Analysis and Disposal ol
Lead- Based Paint-Removal Debris. Issues Impacting Bridge Painting: An Overview. Infrastructure
Technology Institute. FHWA/RD/94/098. August.
U.S. EPA 2002. Industrial Waste Managment Evaluation (IWEM) Technical Background Document.
EPA530-R-02-012.
U.S. EPA. 1998a. Guidance on Quality Assurance Project Plans: EPA QA/G-5. EPA600-R-98-018.
U.S. EPA. 1998b. Guidance on Sampling Designs to Support QA Project Plans. QA/G-5S
U.S. EPA. 1997. Extraction Tests. Draft.
U.S. EPA. 1996a. Guidance for the Data Quality Assessment: Practical Methods for Data Analysis:
EPAQA/G-9. EPA600-R-96-084.
U.S. EPA. 1996b. Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process: EPA QA/G-4. EPA600-R-96-055.
U.S. EPA. 1996c. Hazardous Waste Characteristics Scoping Study.
U.S. EPA. 1996d. National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL)-Las Vegas: Site Characterization
Library Volume 2.
U.S. EPA. 1996e. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods—SW846. Third
Edition.
U.S. EPA. 1995. State Requirements lor Non-Hazardous Industrial Waste Management Facilities.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Identifying Higher-Risk Wastestreams in the Industrial D Universe: The State
Experience. Draft.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Facility Pollution Prevention Guide. EPA600-R-92-088.
U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board. 1991. Leachability Phenomena: Recommendations and Rationale for
Analysis ol Contaminant Release by the Environmental Engineering Committee. EPA-SAB-EEC-92-003.
Winer, BJ. 1971. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2-17
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Appendix: Example Extraction Tests (Draft 9/30/97)
Test Method Leaching Fluid
Liquid:Solid Maximum Number of Time of
Ratio Particle Size Extractions Extractions
Comments
I. Static Tests
A. Agitated Extraction Tests
Toxicity
Characteristic
Leaching
Procedure (1311)
Extraction
Procedure
Toxicity Test (1310)
ASTM D3987-85
Shake Extraction
of Solid Waste
with Water
California WET
Ultrasonic
Agitation
Method for
Accelerating Batch
Leaching Test9
Alternative TCLP
for Construction,
Demolition and
Lead Paint
Abatement Debris10
Extraction
Procedure for Oily
Waste (1330)
Synthetic
Precipitation
Leaching Procedure
(1312)
Equilibrium Leach
Test
0.1 N acetic acid solution,
pH 2.9, for alkaline wastes
0.1 N sodium acetate
buffer solution, pH 5.0,
for non-alkaline wastes
0.5 N acetic acid (pH-5.0)
ASTM IV reagent water
0.2 M sodium citrate
(pH- 5.0)
Distilled water
TCLP acetic acid solutions
Soxhlet with THE and
toluene EP on remaining
solids
#1 Reagent water to pH 4.2
with nitric and sulfuric
acids (60/40)
#2 Regent water to pH 5.0
with nitric and sulfuric
acids (60/40)
Distilled water
20:1
16:1 during
extraction
20:1 final
dilution
20:1
10:1
4:1
20:1
100g:300mL
20:1
20:1
4:1
9.5 mm
9.5 mm
As in
environment
(as received)
2.0 mm
Ground
<9.5
9.5 mm
9.5 mm
150mm
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
18 ±2 hours
24 hours
18 hours
48 hours
30 minutes
8 hours
24 hours (EP)
18±2 hours
7 days
Co-disposal scenario might
not be appropriate; no
allowance for structural
integrity testing of
monolithic samples
High alkalinity samples can
result in variable data
Not validated for organics
Similar to EP, but sodium
citrate makes test more
aggressive
New — little performance
data
Uses heat to decrease
extraction time
ZHE option for organics
Determines contaminants
that have been insolubilized
by solidification
2-18
9 Bisson, D.L.; Jackson D.R.; Williams K.R.; and Grube WE. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 41: 1348-1354.
10 Olcrest, R. A Representative Sampling and Alternative Analytical Toxic Characteristic Leachate Procedure
Method for Construction, Demolition, and Lead Paint Abatement Debris Suspected of Containing Leachable
Lead, Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11(1), January 1996.
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Test Method
Leaching Fluid
Liquid:Solid Maximum Number of Time of
Ratio Particle Size Extractions Extractions
Comments
B. Non-Agitated Extraction Tests
Static Leach Test
Method (material
characteristic
centre- 1)
High Temperature
Static Leach Tests
Method (material
characterization
centre-2)
Can be site specific, 3
standard leachates: water,
brine, silicate/bicarbonate
Same as MCC-1 (conducted
at 100°C)
VOL/surface
10 cm
VOL/Surface
10 cm
40 mm2
surface area
40 mm2
Surface Area
1
1
>7 days
>7 Days
Series ol optional steps
increasing complexity of
analysis
Series of optional steps
increasing complexity of
analysis
C. Sequential Chemical Extraction Tests
Sequential
Extraction Tests
0.04 m acetic acid
50:1
9.5 mm
15
24 hours per
extraction
D. Concentration Build-Up Test
Sequential
Chemical
Extraction
Standard Leach
Test, Procedure C
(Wisconsin)
5 leaching solutions of
increasing acidity
DI water SYN Landfill
Varies from
16.1 to 40.1
10:1, 5:1,
7.5:1
150mm
As in
environment
5
3
Varies 3 or
14 days
3 or 14 days
Examines partitioning of
metals into different
fractions or chemicals forms
Sample discarded after each
leach, new sample added to
existing leachate
II. Dynamic Tests (Leaching Fluid Renewed)
A. Serial Batch (Particle)
Multiple Extraction
Procedure (1320)
Monofill Waste
Extraction
Procedures
Graded Serial Batch
(U.S. Army)
Sequential Batch
Ext. of Waste with
Water ASTM
D-4793-93
Same as EP TOX, then
with synthetic acid rain
(sulfuric acid, nitric acid
in 60:40% mixture)
Distilled/deionized water
or other for specific site
Distilled water
Type IV reagent water
20:1
10:1 per
extraction
Increases
from 2:1 to
96:1
20:1
9.5 mm
9.5 mm or
monolith
N/A
As in
environment
9 (or more)
4
>7
10
24 hours per
extraction
18 hours per
extraction
Until steady
state
18 hours
2-19
-------
Getting Started—Characterizing Waste
Test Method
Leaching Fluid
Liquid:Solid Maximum Number of Time of
Ratio Particle Size Extractions Extractions
Comments
Use of Chelating
Agent to Determine
the Metal
Availability for
Leaching Soils and
Wastes11
Demineralized water with
EDTA, sample to a final
pHof 7±0.5
50 or 100
<300 um
1
18, 24, or
48 hours
Experimental test based on
Method 7341
B. Flow Around Tests
IAEA Dynamic
Leach Test
(International
Atomic Energy
Agency)
Leaching Tests on
Solidified Products12
DLT
DI water/site water
0.1N acetic acid
DI water
N/A
20:1
(Procedure A)
2:1 (6hrs.)
& 10:1
(18 hrs.)
(Procedure B)
N/A
One face
prepared
0.6 um-70um
Surface
washing
>19
1
18
>6 months
24 hours
196 days
S/S technologies most valid
when applied to wastes
contaminated by inorganic
pollutants
C. Flow Through Tests
ASTM D4874-95
Column Test
Type IV reagent water
One void
volume
10 mm
1
24 hours
III. Other Tests
MCC-5s Soxhlet
Test (material
characteristic center)
ASTM C1308-95
Accelerated Leach
Test13
Generalized Acid
Neutralization
Capacity Test11
Acid Neutralization
Capacity
Dl/site water
Acetic acid
HNO3, solutions of
increasing strength
100:1
20:1
3:1
Out and
washed
Able to pass
through an
ASTM No. 40
sieve
150mm
1
1
1
0.2 ml/min
48 hours
48 hours per
extraction
Only applicable if diffusion
is dominant leaching
mechanism
Quantifies the alkalinity of
binder and characterizes
buffering chemistry
2-20
11 Garrabrants, A.C. and Koson, D.S.; Use of Chelating Agent to Determine the Metal Availability for Leaching
from Soils and Wastes, unpublished.
12 Leaching Tests on Solidified Products; Gavasci, R., Lombard!, E, Polettine, A., and Sirini, E
13 C1308-95 Accelerated Leach Test for Diffusive Releases from Solidified Waste and a Computer Program to
Model Diffusive, Fractional Leaching from Cylindrical Wastes.
14 Generalized Acid Neutralization capacity Test; Isenburg, J. and Moore, M.
-------
Part I
Getting Started
Chapter 3
Integrating Pollution Prevention
-------
-------
Contents
I. Benefits of Pollution Prevention 3 - 3
II. Implementing Pollution Prevention 3 - 5
A. Source Reduction 3 - 5
B. Recycling 3-7
C. Treatment 3-8
III. Where to Find Out More: Technical and Financial Assistance 3 - 10
Integrating Pollution Prevention Activity List 3 - 14
Resources 3-15
Figure 1: Waste Management Hierarchy 3 - 2
-------
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Integrating Pollution Prevention
This chapter will help you:
• Consider pollution prevention options when designing a waste
management system. Pollution prevention will reduce waste dis-
posal needs and can minimize impacts across all environmental
media. Pollution prevention can also reduce the volume and toxi-
city of waste. Lastly, pollution prevention can ease some of the
burdens, risks, and liabilities of waste management.
Pollution prevention describes a vari-
ety of practices that go beyond tra-
ditional environmental compliance
or single media permits for water,
air, or land disposal and begin to
address the concept of sustainability in the
use and reuse of natural resources. Adopting
pollution prevention policies and integrating
pollution prevention into operations provide
opportunities to reduce the volume and toxic-
ity of wastes, reduce waste disposal needs,
and recycle and reuse materials formerly han-
dled as wastes. In addition to potential sav-
ings on waste management costs, pollution
prevention can help improve the interactions
This chapter will help address the fol-
lowing questions.
• What are some of the benefits of pol-
lution prevention?
• Where can assistance in identifying
and implementing specific pollution
prevention options be obtained?
among industry, the public, and regulatory
agencies. It can also reduce liabilities and risks
associated with releases from waste manage-
ment units and closure and post-closure care
of waste management units.
Pollution prevention is comprehensive.
It emphasizes a life-cycle approach to assess-
ing a facility's physical plant, production
processes, and products to identify the best
opportunities to minimize environmental
impacts across all media. This approach also
ensures that actions taken in one area will not
increase environmental problems in another
area, such as reducing wastewater discharges
but increasing airborne emissions of volatile
organic compounds. Pollution prevention
requires creative problem solving by a broad
cross section of employees to help achieve
environmental goals. In addition to the envi-
ronmental benefits, implementing pollution
prevention can often benefit a company in
many other ways. For example, redesigning
production processes or finding alternative
material inputs can also improve product
quality, increase efficiency, and conserve raw
materials. Some common examples of pollu-
tion prevention activities include: redesigning
3-1
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
processes or products to reduce raw material
needs and the volume of waste generated;
replacing solvent based cleaners with aqueous
based cleaners or mechanical cleaning sys-
tems; and instituting a reverse distribution
system where shipping packaging is returned
to the supplier for reuse rather than discard.
The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990
established a national policy to first, prevent
or reduce waste at the point of generation
(source reduction); second, recycle or reuse
waste materials; third, treat waste; and finally
dispose of remaining waste in an environ-
mentally protective manner (see Figure 1).
Some states and many local governments
have adopted similar policies, often with
more specific and measurable goals.
Source Reduction means any practice
which (i) reduces the amount of any sub-
stance, pollutant, or contaminant entering
any wastestream or otherwise released into
the environment, prior to recycling, treat-
ment, or disposal; and (ii) reduces the risks
to public health and the environment associ-
ated with the release of such substances, pol-
lutants, or contaminants.
Recycling requires an examination of
waste streams and production processes to
identify opportunities. Recycling and benefi-
cially reusing wastes can help reduce disposal
costs, while using or reusing recycled materi-
als as substitutes for feedstocks can reduce
raw materials costs. Materials exchange pro-
grams can assist in finding uses for recycled
materials and in identifying effective substi-
tutes for raw materials. Recycling not only
helps reduce the overall amount of waste sent
for disposal, but also helps conserve natural
resources by replacing the need for virgin
materials.
Treatment can reduce the volume and
toxicity of a waste. Reducing a waste's volume
and toxicity prior to final disposal can result
in long-term cost savings. There are a consid-
erable number of levels and types of treat-
ment from which to choose. Selecting the
right treatment option can help simplify dis-
posal options and limit future liability.
Figure 1. Waste Management Hierarchy
Waste Management Hierarchy
If NO
If NO
Disposal
3-2
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Over the past 10 years, interest in all aspects
ol pollution prevention has blossomed, and
governments, businesses, academic and
research institutions, and individual citizens
have dedicated greater resources to it. Many
industries are adapting pollution prevention
practices to lit their individual operations.
Pollution prevention can be successlul when
flexible problem-solving approaches and solu-
tions are implemented. Fitting these steps into
your operation's business and environmental
goals will help ensure your program's success.
Throughout the Guide several key steps are
highlighted that are ideal points lor imple-
menting pollution prevention to help reduce
waste management costs, increase options, or
reduce potential liabilities by reducing risks
that the wastes might pose. For example:
Waste characterization is a key compo-
nent ol the Guide. It is also a key component
ol a pollution prevention opportunity assess-
ment. An opportunity assessment, however, is
more comprehensive since it also covers mate-
rial inputs, production processes, operating
practices, and potentially other areas such as
inventory control. When characterizing a
waste, consider expanding the opportunity
assessment to cover these aspects ol the busi-
ness. An opportunity assessment can help
identify the most efficient, cost-effective, and
environmentally friendly combination ol
options, especially when planning new prod-
ucts, new or changed waste management prac-
tices, or facility expansions.
Land application of waste might be a pre-
ferred waste management option because land
application units can manage wastes with high
liquid content, treat wastes through biodegra-
dation, and improve soils due to the organic
material in the waste. Concentrations of con-
stituents might limit the ability to take full
advantage of land application. Reducing the
concentrations of constituents in the waste
before it is generated or treating the waste prior
to land application can provide the flexibility to
use land application and ensure that the prac-
tice will be protective of human health and the
environment and limit future liabilities.
I. Benefits of
Pollution
Prevention
Pollution prevention activities benefit
industry, states, and the public by protecting
the environment and reducing health risks,
and also provide businesses with financial and
strategic benefits.
Protecting human health and the envi-
ronment. By reducing the amount of contami-
nants released into the environment and the
volume of waste requiring disposal, pollution
prevention activities protect human health and
the environment. Decreasing the volume or
toxicity of process materials and wastes can
reduce worker exposure to potentially harmful
constituents. Preventing the release and dis-
posal of waste constituents to the environment
also reduces human and wildlife exposure and
habitat degradation. Reduced consumption of
raw materials and energy conserves precious
natural resources. Finally reducing the volume
of waste generated decreases the need for con-
struction of new waste management facilities,
preserving land for other uses such as recre-
ation or wildlife habitat.
Cost savings. Many pollution prevention
activities make industrial processes and equip-
ment more resource-efficient. This increased
production efficiency saves raw material and
labor costs, lowers maintenance costs due to
newer equipment, and potentially lowers over-
sight costs due to process simplification. When
planning pollution prevention activities, con-
sider the cost of the initial investment for
audits, equipment, and labor. This cost will
3-3
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
vary depending on
the size and com-
plexity of waste
reduction activi-
ties. In addition,
consider the pay-
back time for the
investment.
Prioritize pollution
prevention activi-
ties to maximize
cost savings and
health and envi-
ronmental benefits.
Simpler design and operating conditions.
Reducing the risks associated with wastes can
allow wastes to be managed under less strin-
gent design and operating conditions. For
example, the ground-water tool in Chapter 7,
Section A - Assessing Risk might indicate that
a composite liner is recommended for a specif-
ic waste stream. A pollution prevention oppor-
tunity assessment also might imply that by
implementing a pollution prevention activity
that lowers the concentrations of one or two
problematic waste constituents in that waste
stream, a compacted clay liner can provide
sufficient protection. When the risks associat-
ed with waste disposal are reduced, the long-
term costs of closure and post-closure care can
also be reduced.
Improved work-
er safety. Processes
involving less toxic
and less physically
dangerous materials
can improve worker
safety by reducing
work-related injuries
and illnesses. In
addition to strength-
ening morale,
improved worker
safety also reduces
health-related costs from lost work days,
health insurance, and disability payments.
Lower liability. A well-operated unit mini-
mizes releases, accidents, and unsafe waste-
handling practices. Reducing the volume and
toxicity of waste decreases the impact of these
events if they occur. Reducing potential liabili-
ties decreases the likelihood of litigation and
cleanup costs.
Higher product quality. Many corporations
have found that higher product quality results
from some pollution prevention efforts. A sig-
nificant part of the waste in some operations
consists of products that fail quality inspec-
tions, so minimizing waste in those cases is
inextricably linked with process changes that
improve quality. Often, managers do not realize
how easy or technically feasible such changes
are until the drive for waste reduction leads to
exploration of the possibilities.
Building community relations. Honesty
and openness can strengthen credibility
between industries, communities, and regula-
tory agencies. If you are implementing a pollu-
tion prevention program, make people aware
of it. Environmental protection and economic
growth can be compatible objectives.
Additionally, dialogue among all parties in the
development of pollution prevention plans can
help identify and address concerns.
3-4
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
II. Implementing
Pollution
Prevention
When implementing pollution prevention,
consider a combination of options that best
fits your facility and its products. There are a
number of steps common to implementing
any facility-wide pollution prevention effort.
An essential starting point is to make a clear
commitment to identifying and taking advan-
tage of pollution prevention opportunities.
Seek the participation of interested partners,
develop a policy statement committing the
industrial operation to pollution prevention,
and organize a team to take responsibility for
it. As a next step, conduct a thorough pollu-
tion prevention opportunity assessment. Such
an assessment will help set priorities accord-
ing to which options are the most promising.
Another feature common to many pollution
prevention programs is measuring the pro-
gram's progress.
The actual pollution prevention practices
implemented are the core of a program. The
following sections give a brief overview of
these core activities: source reduction, recy-
cling, and treatment. To find out more, con-
tact some of the organizations listed
throughout this chapter.
A. Source Reduction
As defined in the Pollution Prevention Act
of 1990, source reduction means any practice
which (i) reduces the amount of any haz-
ardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant
entering any wastestream or otherwise
released into the environment, prior to recy-
cling, treatment, or disposal; and (ii) reduces
the hazards to public health and the environ-
ment associated with the release of such sub-
stances, pollutants, or contaminants. The
term includes equipment or technology mod-
ifications; process or procedure modifica-
tions; reformulations or redesign of products;
substitution of raw materials; and improve-
ments in housekeeping, maintenance, train-
ing, or inventory control.
Reformulation
or redesign of
products. One
source reduction
option is to refor-
mulate or redesign
products and
processes to incor-
porate materials
more likely to pro-
duce lower-risk
wastes. Some of the
most common
practices include eliminating metals from
inks, dyes, and paints; reformulating paints,
inks, and adhesives to eliminate synthetic
organic solvents; and replacing chemical-
based cleaning solvents with water-based or
citrus-based products. Using raw materials
free from even trace quantities of contami-
nants, whenever possible, can also help
reduce waste at the source.
When substituting materials in an industri-
al process, it is important to examine the
effect on the entire waste stream to ensure
that the overall risk is being reduced. Some
changes can shift contaminants to another
medium rather than actually reduce waste
generation. Switching from solvent-based to
water-based cleaners, for example, will
reduce solvent volume and disposal cost, but
is likely to dramatically increase wastewater
volume. Look at the impact of wastewater
generation on effluent limits and wastewater
treatment sludge production.
Technological modifications. Newer
process technologies often include better
waste reduction features than older ones. For
industrial processes that predate considera-
3-5
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
tion of waste and risk reduction, adopting
new procedures or upgrading equipment can
reduce waste volume, toxicity, and manage-
ment costs. Some examples include redesign-
ing equipment to cut losses during batch
changes or during cleaning and maintenance,
changing to mechanical cleaning devices to
avoid solvent use, and installing more energy-
and material-efficient equipment. State tech-
nical assistance centers, trade associations,
and other organizations listed in this chapter
can help evaluate the potential advantages
and savings of such improvements.
In-process recycling (reuse). In-process
recycling involves the reuse of materials, such
as cutting scraps, as inputs to the same
process from which they came, or uses them
in other processes or for other uses in the
facility. This furthers waste reduction goals by
reducing the need for treatment or disposal
and by conserving energy and resources. A
common example of in-process recycling is
the reuse of wastewater.
Good housekeeping procedures. Some of
the easiest, most cost-effective, and most wide-
ly used waste reduction techniques are simple
improvements in housekeeping. Accidents and
spills generate avoidable disposal hazards and
expenses. They are less likely to occur in
clean, neatly organized facilities.
Good housekeeping techniques that reduce
the likelihood of accidents and spills include
training employees to manage waste and
materials properly; keeping aisles wide and
free of obstructions; clearly labeling contain-
ers with content, handling, storage, expira-
tion, and health and safety information;
spacing stored materials to allow easy access;
surrounding storage areas with containment
berms to control leaks or spills; and segregat-
ing stored materials to avoid cross-contami-
nation, mixing of incompatible materials, and
unwanted reactions. Proper employee train-
ing is crucial to implementing a successful
waste reduction program, especially one fea-
turing good housekeeping procedures. Case
study data indicate that effective employee
training programs can reduce waste disposal
volumes by 10 to 40 percent.1
Regularly scheduled maintenance and
plant inspections are also useful. Maintenance
helps avoid the large cleanups and disposal
operations that can result from equipment
failure. Routine maintenance also ensures that
equipment is operating at peak efficiency, sav-
ing energy, time, and materials. Regularly
scheduled or random, unscheduled plant
inspections help identify potential problems
before they cause waste management prob-
lems. They also help identify areas where
improving the efficiency of materials manage-
ment and handling practices is possible. If
possible, plant inspections, periodically per-
formed by outside inspectors who are less
familiar with day-to-day plant operations, can
bring attention to areas for improvement that
are overlooked by employees accustomed to
the plant's routine practices.
Storing large volumes of raw materials
increases the risk of an accidental spill and
the likelihood that the materials will not be
used due to changes in production schedules,
new product formulations, or material degra-
dation. Companies are sometimes forced to
dispose of materials whose expiration dates
have passed or that are no longer needed.
Efficient inventory control allows a facility to
avoid stocking materials in excess of its abili-
ty to use them, thereby decreasing disposal
volume and cost. Many companies have suc-
cessfully implemented "just-in-time" manu-
facturing systems to avoid the costs and risks
associated with maintaining a large onsite
inventory. In a "just-in-time" manufacturing
system, raw materials arrive as they are need-
ed and only minimal inventories are main-
tained on site.
Freeman, Harry. 1995. Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook. McGraw-Hill, Inc. p. 13.
3-6
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Segregating waste streams is another good
housekeeping procedure that enables a facili-
ty to avoid contaminating lower risk wastes
with hazardous constituents from another
source. Based on a waste characterization
study, it might be more efficient and cost-
effective to manage wastes separately by recy-
cling some, and treating or disposing of
others. Waste segregation can also help
reduce the risks associated with handling
waste. Separating waste streams allows some
materials to be reused, resulting in additional
cost savings. Emerging markets for recovered
industrial waste materials are creating new
economic incentives to segregate waste
streams. Recovered materials are more attrac-
tive to potential buyers if it can be ensured
that they are not tainted with other waste
materials. For example, if wastes from metal-
finishing facilities are segregated by type,
metal-specific-bearing sludge can be recov-
ered more economically and the segregated
solvents and waste oils can be recycled.
B. Recycling
Recycling involves col- ^
lecting, processing, and t
reusing materials that
would otherwise be han-
dled as wastes. The fol-
lowing discussion highlights a few of the
ways to begin this process.
Materials exchange programs. Many local
governments and states have established mate-
rials exchange programs to facilitate transac-
tions between waste generators and industries
that can use wastes as raw materials. Materials
exchanges are an effective and inexpensive way
to find new users and uses for a waste. Most
are publicly funded, nonprofit organizations,
although some charge a nominal fee to be list-
ed with them or to access their online databas-
es. Some actively work to promote exchanges
between generators and users, while others
simply publish lists of generators, materials,
and buyers. Some waste exchanges also spon-
sor workshops and conferences to discuss
waste-related regulations and to exchange
information. More than 60 waste and materials
exchanges operate in North America. Below
are four examples of national, state, and local
exchange programs. Each program's Web site
also provides links to other regional, national,
and international materials exchange net-
works.
• EPAs Jobs Through Recycling (JTR)
Web site provides descriptions
of and links to international, national,
and state-specific materials exchange
programs and organizations.
• Recycler's World is a world-wide
materials trading site with links to
dozens of state and regional exchange
networks.
• CalMAX (California Materials
Exchange) is maintained by the
California Integrated Waste
Management Board and facilitates
waste exchanges in California and
provides links to other local and
national exchange programs.
• King County, Washington's IMEX
is a local industri-
al materials exchange program that
also provides an extensive list of
state, regional, national, and interna-
tional exchange programs.
Beneficial use. Beneficial use involves
substituting a waste material for another
material with similar properties. Utility com-
panies, for example, often use coal combus-
tion ash as a construction material, road base,
or soil stabilizer. The ash replaces other, non-
3-7
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
recycled materials, such as fill or Portland
cement, not only avoiding disposal costs but
also generating revenue. Other examples of
beneficial use include using wastewaters and
sludges as soil amendments (see Chapter 7,
Section C-Designing a Land Application
Program) and using foundry sand in asphalt,
concrete, and roadbed construction.
Many regulatory agencies require approval
of planned beneficial use activities and may
require testing of the materials to be reused.
Others may allow certain wastes to be desig-
nated for beneficial use, as long as the required
analyses are completed. Pennsylvania, for
example, allows application of a "coproduct"
designation to, and exemption from waste reg-
ulations for "materials which are essentially
equivalent to and used in place of an inten-
tionally manufactured product or produced
raw material and... [which present] no greater
risk to the public or the environment."
Generally, regulatory agencies want to ensure
that any beneficially used materials are free
from significantly increased levels of con-
stituents that might pose a greater risk than
the materials they are replacing. Consult with
the state agency for criteria and regulations
governing beneficial use.
In a continuing effort to promote the use of
materials recovered from solid waste, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
instituted the Comprehensive Procurement
Guideline (CPG) program. Using recycled-con-
tent products ensures that materials collected
in recycling programs will be used again in the
manufacture of new products. The CPG pro-
gram is authorized by Congress under Section
6002 of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and Executive Order
13101. Under the CPG program, EPA is
required to designate products that are or can
be made with recovered materials and to rec-
ommend practices for buying these products.
Once a product is designated, procuring agen-
cies are required to purchase it with the high-
est recovered material content level practica-
ble. As of January 2001, EPA has designated
54 items within eight product categories
including items such as retread tires, cement
and concrete containing coal fly ash and
ground granulated blast furnace slag, traffic
barricades, playground surfaces, landscaping
products, and nonpaper office products like
binders and toner cartridges. While directed
primarily at federal, state, and local procuring
agencies, CPG information is helpful to every-
one interested in purchasing recycled-content
products. For further information on the CPG
program, visit: .
C. Treatment
Treatment of non-hazardous industrial
waste is not a federal requirement, however,
it can help to reduce the volume and toxicity
of waste prior to disposal. Treatment can also
make a waste amenable for reuse or recycling.
Consequently, a facility managing non-haz-
ardous industrial waste might elect to apply
treatment. For example, treatment might be
incorporated to address volatile organic com-
pound (VOC) emissions from a waste manag-
ment unit, or a facility might elect to treat a
waste so that a less stringent waste manage-
ment system design could be used. Treatment
involves changing a waste's physical, chemi-
cal, or biological character or composition
through designed techniques or processes.
There are three primary categories of treat-
ment—physical, chemical, and biological.
Physical treatment involves changing the
waste's physical properties such as its size,
shape, density, or state (i.e., gas, liquid, solid).
Physical treatment does not change a waste's
chemical composition. One form of physical
treatment, immobilization, involves encapsu-
lating waste in other materials, such as plastic,
resin, or cement, to prevent constituents from
volatilizing or leaching. Listed below are a few
examples of physical treatment.
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
• Immobilization:
Encapsulation
Thermoplastic binding
• Carbon absorption:
Granular activated carbon (GAC)
Powdered activated carbon (PAC)
• Distillation:
Batch distillation
Fractionation
Thin film extraction
Steam stripping
Thermal drying
• Filtration
• Evaporation/volatilization
• Grinding
• Shredding
• Compacting
• Solidification/addition of absorbent
material
Chemical treatment involves altering a
waste's chemical composition, structure, and
properties through chemical reactions.
Chemical treatment can consist of mixing the
waste with other materials (reagents), heating
the waste to high temperatures, or a combi-
nation of both. Through chemical treatment,
waste constituents can be recovered or
destroyed. Listed below are a few examples of
chemical treatment.
• Neutralization
• Oxidation
• Reduction
• Precipitation
• Acid leaching
• Ion exchange
• Incineration
• Thermal desorption
• Stabilization
• Vitrification
• Extraction:
Solvent extraction
Critical extraction
• High temperature metal recovery
(HTMR)
Biological treatment can be divided into two
categories-aerobic and anaerobic. Aerobic bio-
logical treatment uses oxygen-requiring
microorganisms to decompose organic and
non-metallic constituents into carbon dioxide,
water, nitrates, sulfates, simpler organic prod-
ucts, and cellular biomass (i.e., cellular growth
and reproduction). Anaerobic biological treat-
ment uses microorganisms, in the absence of
oxygen, to transform organic constituents and
nitrogen-containing compounds into oxygen
and methane gas (CH4(g)). Anaerobic biologi-
cal treatment typically is performed in an
enclosed digestor unit. Listed below are a few
examples of biological treatment.
• Aerobic:
Activated sludge
Aerated lagoon
Trickling filter
Rotating biological contactor (RBC)
• Anaerobic digestion
The range of treatment methods from
which to choose is as diverse as the range of
wastes to be treated. More advanced treat-
ment will generally be more expensive, but
by reducing the quantity and risk level of the
waste, costs might be reduced in the long
run. Savings could come from not only lower
disposal costs, but also lower closure and
post-closure care costs. Treatment and post-
treatment waste management methods can be
selected to minimize both total cost and envi-
ronmental impact, keeping in mind that treat-
ment residuals, such as sludges, are wastes
themselves that will need to be managed.
3-9
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
III. Whereto Find
Out More:
Technical and
Financial
Assistance
There is a wealth of information available to
help integrate pollution prevention into an
operation. As a starting point, a list of refer-
ences to technical and financial resources is
included in this section. The Internet can be
an excellent source of background information
on the various resources to help begin the
search for assistance. Waste reduction informa-
tion and technologies are constantly changing.
To follow new developments you should main-
tain technical and financial contacts and con-
tinue to use these resources even after
beginning waste reduction activities. Eventual-
ly you can build a network of contacts to sup-
port all your various technical needs.
Where Can Assistance Be
Obtained?
Several types of organizations offer assis-
tance. These include offices in regulatory
agencies, university departments, nonprofit
foundations, and trade associations.
Additionally, the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) Manu-
facturing Extension Partnerships (MEPs)
also provide waste
reduction information. Look for waste reduc-
tion staff within the media programs (air,
water, solid/hazardous waste) of regulatory
agencies or in the state commissioner's office,
special projects division, or pollution preven-
tion division. Some states also provide techni-
cal assistance for waste reduction activities,
such as recycling, through a business advo-
cate or small business technical assistance
program. EPA's U.S. State & Local Gateway
Web site is a helpful tool for
locating your state environmental agency.
The listings below identify some primary
sources for technical assistance that might
prove helpful. This list serves as a starting
point only and is by no means exhaustive.
There are many additional organizations that
offer pollution prevention assistance on
regional, state, and local levels.
• American Forest and Paper
Association (AF&PA) is the nation-
al trade association of the forest,
paper, and wood products industries.
It offers documents that might help
you find buyers for wood and paper
wastes, Phone:
800 878-8878 e-mail: INFO®
afandpa. ccmail. CompuServe. com
• California Integrated Waste
Management Board. This Web site
contains general waste prevention
background and business waste
reduction program overviews, fact
sheets, and information about market
development for recycled materials
and waste reduction training.
• Center for Environmental Research
Information (CERI) provides techni-
cal guides and manuals on waste
reduction, summaries of pollution
prevention opportunity assessments,
3-10
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
and waste reduction alternatives for
specific industry sectors.
Phone: 513-569-7562 e-mail:
ord. ceri@epamail. epa.gov
Enviro$en$e, part of the U.S. EPA's
Web site, provides a single repository
for pollution prevention, compliance
assurance, and enforcement informa-
tion and data bases. Its search engine
searches multiple Web sites (inside
and outside the EPA), and offers
assistance in preparing a search.
National Pollution Prevention
Roundtable (NPPR) promotes the
development, implementation, and
evaluation of pollution prevention.
NPPR's Web site provides an abridged
online version of The Pollution
Prevention Yellow Pages ,
a listing of local, state, regional and
national organizations, including
state and local government programs,
federal agencies, EPA pollution pre-
vention coordinators, and non-profit
groups that work on pollution pre-
vention. Phone: 202
466-P2P2
P2 GEMS. This site, an Internet
search tool operated by the
Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction
Institute, can help facility planners,
engineers, and managers locate
process and materials management
information over the Web. It includes
information on over 550 sites valu-
able for toxics use reduction planning
and pollution prevention.
Pollution Prevention Information
Clearinghouse (PPIC). PPIC main-
tains a collection of EPA non-regula-
tory documents related to waste
reduction, Phone: 202
260-1023 e-mail: ppic@epamail.
epa.gov
• U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Industrial Assessment Centers
(lACs). DOE's Office of Industrial
Technologies sponsors free industrial
assessments for small and medium-
sized manufacturers. Teams of engi-
neering students from the centers
conduct energy audits or industrial
assessments and provide recommen-
dations to manufacturers to help
them identify opportunities to
improve productivity, reduce waste,
and save energy,
What Types of Technical
Assistance Are Available?
Many state and local governments have
technical assistance programs that are distinct
from regulatory offices. In addition, non-
governmental organizations conduct a wide
range of activities to educate businesses about
the value of pollution prevention. These
efforts range from providing onsite technical
assistance and sharing industry-specific expe-
riences to conducting research and develop-
ing education and outreach materials on
waste reduction topics. The following exam-
ples illustrate what services are available:
• NIST technical centers. There are
NIST-sponsored Manufacturing
Technology Centers throughout the
country as part of the grassroots
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
(MEP) program. The MEP program
helps small and medium-sized com-
panies adopt new waste reduction
3-11
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
technologies by providing technical
information, financing, training, and
other services. The NIST Web site
has a locator that
can help you find the nearest center.
Trade associations. Trade associa-
tions provide industry-specific assis-
tance through publications,
workshops, field research, and con-
sulting services. EPA's Waste Wise
program provides an online
resources directory which can help
you locate specific trade associations.
The National Trade and Professional
Associations of the Unites States'
Directory of Trade Associations
(Washington, DC: Columbia Books,
Inc., 2000) is another useful resource.
Onsite technical assistance audits.
These audits are for small (and some-
times larger) businesses. The assess-
ments, which take place outside of
the regulatory environment and on a
strictly voluntary basis, provide busi-
nesses with information on how to
save money, increase efficiency, and
improve community relations. DOE's
Office of Industrial Technologies
is one
example.
Facility planning assistance. A num-
ber of organizations can help busi-
nesses develop, review, or evaluate
facility waste reduction plans. State
waste reduction programs frequently
prepare model plans designed to
demonstrate activities a business can
implement to minimize waste.
Research and collaborative pro-
jects. Academic institutions, state
agencies and other organizations fre-
quently participate in research and
collaborative projects with industry
to foster development of waste
reduction technologies and manage-
ment strategies. Laboratory and field
research activities include studies,
surveys, database development, data
collection, and analysis.
Hotlines. Some states operate tele-
phone assistance services to provide
technical waste reduction information
to industry and the general public.
Hotline staff typically answer ques-
tions, provide referrals, and distribute
printed technical materials on request.
Computer searches and the
Internet. The Internet brings many
pollution prevention resources to a
user's fingertips. The wide range of
resources available electronically can
provide information about innovative
waste-reducing technologies, efficient
industrial processes, current state
and federal regulations, and many
other pertinent topics. Independent
searches can be done on the Internet,
and some states perform computer
searches to provide industry with
information about waste reduction.
EPA and many state agencies have
Web sites dedicated to these topics,
with case studies, technical explana-
tions, legal information, and links to
other sites for more information.
3-12
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Workshops, seminars, and training.
State agencies, trade associations, and
other organizations conduct work-
shops, seminars, and technical train-
ing on waste reduction. These events
provide information, identify
resources, and facilitate networking.
Grants and loans. A number of
states distribute funds to independent
groups that conduct waste reduction
activities. These groups often use
such support to fund research and to
run demonstration and pilot projects.
3-13
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Integrating Pollution
Prevention Activity List
To address pollution prevention you should:
Q Make waste management decisions by considering the priorities set by the full range of pollution
prevention options—first, source reduction; second, reuse and recycling; third, treatment; last, dis-
posal.
Q Explore the cost savings and other benefits available through activities that integrate pollution pre-
vention.
Q Develop a waste reduction policy.
Q Conduct a pollution prevention opportunity assessment of facility processes.
Q Research potential pollution prevention activities.
Q Consult with public and private agencies and organizations providing technical and financial assis-
tance for pollution prevention activities.
Q Plan and implement activities that integrate pollution prevention.
3-14
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Resources
Erickson, S. and King, B. 1999. Fundamentals ol Environmental Management. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc.
Freeman, Harry. 1995. Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
"Green Consumerism: Commitment Remains Strong Despite Economic Pessimism." 1992. Cambridge
Reports. Research International. (October).
Habicht, F Henry. 1992. U.S. EPA Memorandum on EPA Definition ol Pollution Prevention (May).
Higgins, Thomas E., ed. 1995. Pollution Prevention Handbook. CRC-Lewis Publishers.
"Moving from Industrial Waste to Coproducts." 1997. Biocycle. (January)
National Pollution Prevention Roundtable. 1995. The Pollution Prevention Yellow Pages.
Pollution Prevention Act ol 1990. (42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., Pub.L. 101-508, November 5, 1990).
Rossiter, Alan P., ed. 1995. Waste Minimization Through Process Design. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
U.S. EPA. 2001. Pollution Prevention Clearinghouse: Quarterly List ol Pollution Prevention
Publications, Winter 2001. EPA742-F-01-004.
U.S. EPA. 1998. Project XL: Good for the Environment, Good lor Business, Good for Communities.
EPA100-F-98-008.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Developing and Using Production Adjusted Measurements ol Pollution Prevention.
EPA600-R-9 7-048.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Guide to Accessing Pollution Prevention Information Electronically. EPA742-B-97-003
U.S. EPA. 1997. Pollution Prevention 1997: A National Progress Report. EPA742-R-97-001.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Technical Support Document for Best Management Practices Programs—Spent
Pulping Liquor Management, Spill Prevention, and Control.
U.S. EPA. 1996. Environmental Accounting Project: Quick Reference Fact Sheet. EPA742-F-96-001.
3-15
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1996. Profiting from Waste Reduction in Your Small Business. EPA742-B-88-100.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Paints and Coatings. EPA600-S-95-009.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Bourbon Whiskey. EPA600-S-95-010.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Automotive Battery Separators. EPA600-S-95-011.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Automotive Lighting Equipment and Accessories. EPA600-S-95-012.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Locking Devices. EPA600-S-95-013.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Combustion Engine Piston Rings. EPA600-S-95-015.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Metal Fasteners.EPA600-S-95-016.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Stainless Steel Pipes and Fittings. EPA600-S-95-017.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Outboard Motors. EPA600-S-95-018.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Electroplated Truck Bumpers. EPA600-S-95-019.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Printed Circuit
Board Plant.EPA600-S-95-020.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Folding Paperboard Cartons. EPA600-S-95-021.
3-16
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Rebuilt Industrial Crankshafts. EPA600-S-95-022.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Pressure-sensitive Adhesive Tape. EPA600-S-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Wooden Cabinets. EPA600-S-95-024.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Power Supplies. EPA600-S-95-025.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Food Service Equipment. EPA600-S-95-026.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Metal Parts
Coater. EPA600-S-95-027.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Gear Cases for Outboard Motors. EPA600-S-95-028.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Electrical Load Centers. EPA600-S-95-029.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Pharmaceuticals. EPA600-S-95-030.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Environmental Research Brief: Pollution Prevention Assessment for a Manufacturer of
Aircraft Landing Gear. EPA600-S-95-032.
U.S. EPA. 1995. EPA Standards Network Fact Sheet: Role of Voluntary Standards. EPA741-F-95-005.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Introduction to Pollution Prevention: Training Manual. EPA742-B-95-003.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Recent Experience in Encouraging the Use of Pollution Prevention in Enforcement
Settlements: Final Report. EPA300-R-95-006.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Recycling Means Business. EPA530-K-95-005.
3-17
-------
Getting Started—Integrating Pollution Prevention
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1994. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) Background Document for
Universal Standards, Volume B: Universal Standards for Wastewater forms ol Listed Hazardous Wastes,
Section 5, Treatment Performance Database. EPA530-R-95-033.
U.S. EPA. 1994. Review ol Industrial Waste Exchanges. EPA530-K-94-003.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Guidance Manual for Developing Best Management Practices. EPA833-B-93-004.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Primer for Financial Analysis ol Pollution Prevention Projects. EPA600-R-93-059.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Facility Pollution Prevention Guide. EPA600-R-92-008.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Practical Guide to Pollution Prevention Planning for the Iron and Steel Industries.
EPA742-B-92-100
U.S. EPA. 1991. Pollution Prevention Strategy. EPA741-R-92-001.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Treatment Technology Background Document; Third Third; Final. EPA530-SW-90-
059Z.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Guide to Pollution Prevention: Printed Circuit Board Manulacturing Industry. EPA625-
7-90-007
U.S. EPA. 1990. Waste Minimization: Environmental Quality with Economic Benefits. EPA530-SW-90-
044.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Treatment Technology Background Document; Second Third; Final. EPA530-SW-89-
048A.
3-18
-------
Part I
Getting Started
Chapter 4
Considering the Site
-------
-------
Contents
I. General Siting Considerations 4-3
A. Floodplains 4 - 3
B. Wetlands 4-6
C. Active Fault Areas 4 - 10
D. Seismic Impact Zones 4-12
E. Unstable Areas 4-14
F. Airport Vicinities 4 - 18
G. Wellhead Protection Areas 4 - 19
II. Buffer Zone Considerations 4 - 20
A. Recommended Buffer Zones 4 - 21
B. Additional Buffer Zones 4 - 22
III. Local Land Use and Zoning Considerations 4 - 23
IV Environmental Justice Considerations 4 - 23
Considering the Site Activity List 4 - 25
Resources 4-27
Appendix: State Buffer Zone Considerations 4 - 30
Tables:
Table 1: Examples of Improvement Techniques for Liquefiable Soil Foundation Conditions 4 - 12
-------
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Considering the Site
This chapter will help you:
• Become familiar with environmental, geological, and manmade fea-
tures that influence siting decisions.
• Identify nearby areas or land uses that merit buffer zones and place
your unit an appropriate distance from them.
• Comply with local land use and zoning restrictions, including any
amendments occurring during consideration of potential sites.
• Understand existing environmental justice issues as you consider a
new site.
• Avoid siting a unit in hydro/ogle or geologic problem areas, without
first designing the unit to address conditions in those areas.
Many hydrologic and geologic
settings can be effectively uti-
lized for protective waste
management. There are,
however, some hydrologic
and geologic conditions that are best avoided
all together if possible. If they cannot be
avoided, special design and construction pre-
cautions can minimize risks. Floodplains,
This chapter will help address the follow-
ing questions:
• What types of sites need special consid-
eration?
• How will I know whether my waste
management unit is in an area requir-
ing special consideration?
• Why should I be concerned about sit-
ing a waste management unit in such
areas?
• What actions can I take if I plan to site
a unit in these areas?
earthquake zones, unstable soils, and areas at
risk for subsurface movement need to be
taken into account just as they would be
when siting and constructing a manufactur-
ing plant or home. Catastrophic events asso-
ciated with these locations could seriously
damage or destroy a waste management unit,
release contaminants into the environment,
and add substantial expenses for cleanup,
repair, or reconstruction. If problematic site
conditions cannot be avoided, engineering
design and construction techniques can
address some of the concerns raised by locat-
ing a unit in these areas.
Many state, local, and tribal governments
require buffer zones between waste manage-
ment units and other nearby land uses. Even
if buffer zones are not required, they can still
provide benefits now and in the future. Buffer
zones provide time and space to contain and
remediate accidental releases before they
reach sensitive environments or sensitive
populations. Buffer zones also help maintain
good community relations by reducing dis-
ruptions associated with noise, traffic, and
4-1
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
wind-blown dust, often the source of serious
neighborhood concerns.
In considering impacts on the surrounding
community, it is important to understand
whether the community, especially one with a
large minority and low income population,
already faces significant environmental
impacts from existing industrial activities. You
should develop an understanding of the com-
munity's current environmental problems and
work together to develop plans that can
improve and benefit the environment, the
community, the state, and the company.
How should a waste
management unit site
assessment begin?
In considering whether to site a new waste
management unit or laterally expand an exist-
ing unit, certain factors will influence the sit-
ing process. These factors include land
availability, distance from waste generation
points, ease of access, local climatic condi-
tions, economics, environmental considera-
tions, local zoning requirements, and potential
impacts on the community. As prospective
sites are identified, you should become famil-
iar with the siting considerations raised in this
chapter. Determine how to address concerns at
each site to minimize a unit's adverse impacts
on the environment in addition to the environ-
ment's adverse impacts on the unit. You should
choose the site that best balances protection of
human health and the environment with oper-
ational goals. In addition to considering the
issues raised in this chapter, you should check
with state and local regulatory agencies early
in the siting process to identify other issues
and applicable restrictions.
Another factor to consider is whether there
are any previous or current contamination
problems at the site. It is recommended that
potential sites for new waste management
units be free of any contamination problems.
An environmental site assessment (ESA) may
be required prior to the disturbance of any
land area or before property titles are trans-
ferred. An ESA is the process of determining
whether contamination is present on a parcel
of property. You should check with the EPA
regional office and state or local authorities to
determine if there are any ESA requirements
prior to siting a new unit or expanding an
existing unit. If there are no requirements,
you might want to consider performing an
ESA in order to ensure that there are no cont-
amination problems at the site.
Many companies specialize in site screening,
characterization, and sampling of different
environmental media (i.e., air, water, soil) for
potential contamination. A basic ESA (often
referred to as the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment process) typically involves
researching prior land use, deciding if sam-
pling of environmental media is necessary
based on the prior activities, and determining
contaminate fate and transport if contamina-
tion has occurred. Liability issues can arise if
the site had contamination problems prior to
construction or expansion of the waste man-
agement unit. Information on the extent of
contamination is needed to quantify cleanup
costs and determine the cleanup approach.
Cleanup costs can represent an additional,
possibly significant, project cost when siting a
waste management unit.
As discussed later in this chapter, you will
also need to consider other federal laws and
regulations that could affect siting. For exam-
ple, the Endangered Species Act (16 USC
Sections 1531 et seq.) provides for the desig-
nation and protection of threatened or endan-
gered wildlife, fish, and plant species, and
ensures the conservation of the ecosystems on
which such species depend. It is the responsi-
bility of the facility manager to check with
and obtain a Section 10 permit from the
Secretary of the Interior if the construction or
operation of a waste management unit might
potentially impact any endangered or threat-
4-2
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
ened species or its critical habitat. Thus, you
might not be able to site a new waste man-
agement unit in an area where endangered or
threatened species live, or expand an existing
unit into such an area. As another example,
the National Historic Preservation Act (16
USC Sections 470 et seq.) protects historic
sites and archaeological resources. The facility
manager of a waste management unit should
be aware of the properties listed on the
National Register of Historic Properties. The
facility manager should consult with the state
historic preservation office to ensure that the
property to be used for a new unit or lateral
expansion of an existing unit will not impact
listed historic properties, or sites with archeo-
logical significance. Other federal laws or
statutes might also require consideration. It is
the ultimate responsibility of the facility
owner or manager to comply with the
requirements of all applicable federal and
state statutes when siting a waste manage-
ment unit.
Additional factors, such as proximity to
other activities or sites that affect the environ-
ment, also might influence siting decisions.
To determine your unit's proximity to other
facilities or industrial sites, you can utilize
EPAfe Envirofacts Warehouse. The Envirofacts
Web site at provides users with access to sev-
eral EPA databases that will provide you with
information about various environmental
activities including toxic chemical releases,
water discharges, hazardous waste handling
processes, Super fund status, and air releases.
The Web site allows you to search one data-
base or several databases at a time about a
specific location or facility. You can also cre-
ate maps that display environmental informa-
tion using the "Enviromapper" application
located at .
I. General Siting
Considerations
Examining the topography of a site is the
first step in siting a unit. Topographic infor-
mation is available from the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS), the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)1, the state's geo-
logical survey office or environmental regula-
tory agency, or local colleges and universities.
Remote sensing data or maps from these orga-
nizations can help you determine whether
your prospective site is located in any of the
areas of concern discussed in this section.
USGS maps can be downloaded or ordered
from their Web site at .
Also, the University of Missouri-Rolla main-
tains a current list of state geological survey
offices on its library's Web site at
.
A. Floodplains
A floodplain is a relatively flat, lowland
area adjoining inland and coastal waters. The
This agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture was formerly known as the Soil Conservation
Service (SCS).
4-3
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Flood waters overflowed from the
Mississippi River (center) into its floodplain
(foreground) at Quincy, Illinois in the 1993
floods that exceeded 100-year levels in parts
of the Midwest.
100-year floodplain—the area susceptible to
inundation during a large magnitude flood
with a 1 percent chance of recurring in any
given year—is usually the floodplain of con-
cern for waste management units. You should
determine whether a candidate site is in a
f 00-year floodplain. Siting a waste manage-
ment unit in a f 00-year floodplain increases
the likelihood of floods inundating the unit,
increases the potential for damage to liner sys-
tems and support components (e.g., leachate
collection and removal systems or other unit
structures), and presents operational concerns.
This, in turn, creates environmental and
human health and safety concerns, as well as
legal liabilities. It can also be very costly to
build a unit to withstand a f 00-year flood
without washout of waste or damage to the
unit, or to reconstruct a unit after such a
flood. Further, locating your unit in a flood-
plain can exacerbate the damaging effects of a
flood, both upstream and downstream, by
reducing the temporary water storage capacity
of the floodplain. As such, it is preferable to
locate potential sites outside the f 00-year
floodplain.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in a 100-year
floodplain?
The first step in determining whether a
prospective site is located in a f 00-year flood-
plain is to consult with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA has pre-
pared flood hazard boundary maps for most
regions. If a prospective site does not appear
to be located in a floodplain, further explo-
ration is not necessary. If uncertainty exists as
to whether the prospective site might be in a
floodplain, several sources of information are
available to help make this determination.
More detailed flood insurance rate maps
(FIRMs) can be obtained from FEMA. FIRMs
divide floodplain areas into three zones: A, B,
and C. Class A zones are the most susceptible
to flooding while class C zones are the least
susceptible. FIRMs can be obtained from
FEMAs Web site at ).
FEMA also publishes The National Flood
Insurance Program Community Status Book
which lists communities with flood insurance
rate maps or floodway maps. Floodplain maps
can also be obtained through the US
Geological Survey (USGS); National Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS); the Bureau of
Land Management; the Tennessee Valley
Authority; and state, local, and tribal agencies.2
Note that river channels shown in flood-
plain maps can change due to hydropower or
flood control projects. As a result, some flood-
plain boundaries might be inaccurate. If you
suspect this to be the case, consult recent aeri-
al photographs to determine how river chan-
nels have been modified.
Copies of flood maps from FEMA are available at Map Service Center, EO. Box 1038, Jessup, MD 20794-
1038, by phone 800 358-9616, or the Internet at .
4-4
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
If maps cannot be obtained, and
a potential site is suspected to be
located in a floodplain, you can
conduct a field study to delineate
the floodplain and determine the
floodplain's properties. To perform
a delineation, you can draw on
meteorological records and physio-
graphic information, such as exist-
ing and planned watershed land
use, topography, soils and geo-
graphic mapping, and aerial photo-
graphic interpretation of land
forms. Additionally, you can use
the U.S. Water Resources Council's
methods of determining flood
potential based on stream gauge
records, or you can estimate the
peak discharge to approximate the
probability of exceeding the 100-
year flood. Contact the USGS,
Office of Surface Water, for addi-
tional information concerning
these methods.3
What can be done if a
prospective site is in a
floodplain?
If a new waste management unit
or lateral expansion will be sited in
a floodplain, design the unit to pre-
vent the washout of waste, avoid sig-
nificant alteration of flood flow, and maintain
the temporary storage capacity of the flood-
plain. Engineering models can be used to
estimate a floodplain's storage capacity and
floodwater flow velocity. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Hydrologic
Engineering Center has developed several
computer models for simulating flood prop-
erties.4 The models can predict how a waste
management unit sited in a floodplain can
affect its storage capacity and can also simu-
late flood control structures and sediment
FEMA provides flood maps like this one for most floodplains
Source: FEMA, Q3 Flood Data Users Guide .
transport. If a computer model predicts that
placement of the waste management unit in
the floodplain raises the base flood level by
more than 1 foot, the unit might alter the
storage capacity of the floodplain. If design-
ing a new unit, you should site it to minimize
these effects. The impact of your unit's loca-
tion on the speed and flow of flood waters
determines the likelihood of waste washout.
To quantify this, estimate the shear stress on
the unit's support components caused by the
impinging flood waters at the depth, velocity,
Information on stream gaging and flood forecasting can be obtained from the USGS, Office of Surface
Water, at 413 National Center, Reston, VA 22092, by phone 703 648-5977, or the Internet at
.
The HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, and HEC-6 software packages are available free of charge through the
USAGE Web site at .
4-5
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
wm
1986
DEU
1977
Knowing the behavior of waters at their
peak flood level is important for determin-
ing whether waste will wash out.
and duration associated with the peak (i.e.,
highest) flow period of the flood.
While these methods can help protect
your unit from flood damage and washout,
be aware that they can further contribute to a
decrease in the water storage and flow capac-
ity of the floodplain. This, in turn, can raise
the level of flood waters not only in your area
but in upstream and downstream locations,
increasing the danger of flood damage and
adding to the cost of flood control programs.
Thus, serious consideration should be given
to siting a waste management unit outside a
f 00-year floodplain.
B. Wetlands
Wetlands, which include swamps, marshes,
and bogs, are vital and delicate ecosystems.
They are among the most productive biologi-
cal communities on earth and provide habitat
for many plants and animals. The U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service estimates that up to 43
percent of all endangered or threatened
species rely on wetlands for their survival.5
Riprap (rock cover) reduces stream channel erosion (left) and gabions (crushed rock encased
in wire mesh) help stabilize erodible slopes (right).
Sources: U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining (left); The Construction
Site—A Directory To The Construction Industry (right).
From EPAs Wetlands Web site, Values and Functions of Wetlands factsheet,
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
For regulatory purposes under the Clean
Water Act, wetlands are defined as areas
"that are inundated or saturated by sur-
face or ground water at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support, and that
under normal circumstances do support,
a prevalence of vegetation typically adapt-
ed for life in saturated soil conditions."
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 232.2(r)
Wetlands protect water quality by assimilating
water pollutants, removing sediments contain-
ing heavy metals, and recharging ground-
water supplies. Wetlands also prevent
potentially extensive and costly floods by tem-
porarily storing flood waters and reducing
their velocity. These areas also offer numerous
recreational opportunities.
Potential adverse impacts associated with
locating your unit in a wetland include dewa-
tering the wetland (i.e., causing removal or
drainage of water), contaminating the wet-
land, and causing loss of wetland acreage.
Damage could also be done to important wet-
land ecosystems by destroying their aesthetic
qualities and diminishing wildlife breeding
and feeding opportunities. Siting in a wetland
increases the potential for damage to your
unit, especially your liner system and struc-
tural components, as a result of ground set-
tlement, action of the high water table, and
flooding. Alternatives to siting a waste man-
agement unit in a wetland area should be
given serious consideration based upon
Section 404 requirements in the Clean Water
Act (CWA) as discussed below.
If a waste management unit is to be sited in
a wetland area, the unit will be subject to
additional regulations. In particular, Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) authorizes
the Secretary of the Army, acting through the
Chief of Engineers, to issue permits for the
discharge of dredged or fill material into wet-
lands and other waters of the United States.6
Activities in waters of the United States regu-
lated under this permitting program include
"placement of fill material for construction or
maintenance of any liner, berm, or other
infrastructure associated with solid waste
landfills," as well as fills for development,
water resource projects, infrastructure
improvements, and conversion of wetlands to
uplands for farming and forestry (40 CFR
Section 232.2—definition of "discharge of fill
material"). EPA regulations under Section 404
(33 United States Code Section 1344) stipu-
lates that no discharge of dredged or fill mate-
rial can be permitted if a practicable
alternative exists that is less damaging to the
aquatic environment or if the nation's waters
would be significantly degraded. Therefore, in
Different types of wetlands: spruce bog (left) and eco pond in the Florida Everglades (right).
For the full text of the Clean Water Act, including Section 404, visit the U.S. House of Representatives
Internet Law Library Web site at , under Title 33, Chapter 26.
4-7
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
compliance with the guidelines established
under Section 404, all permit applicants must:
• Take steps to avoid wetland impacts
where practicable.
• Minimize impacts to wetlands where
they are unavoidable.
• Compensate for any remaining,
unavoidable impacts by restoring or
creating wetlands.
The EPA and USAGE jointly administer a
review process to issue permits for regulated
activities. For projects with potentially signifi-
cant impacts, an individual permit is usually
required. For most discharges with only mini-
mal adverse effects, USAGE may allow appli-
cants to comply with existing general
permits, which are issued on a nationwide,
regional, or statewide basis for particular
activity categories as a means to expedite the
permitting process. In making permitting
decisions, the agencies will consider other
federal laws that might restrict placement of
waste management units in wetlands. These
include the Endangered Species Act; the
Migratory Bird Conservation Act; the Coastal
Zone Management Act; the Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act; the Marine Protection, Research
and Sanctuaries Act; and the National
Historic Preservation Act.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in a wetland?
As a first step, determine if the prospective
site meets the definition of a wetland. If the
prospective site does not appear to be a wet-
land, then no further exploration is necessary.
If it is uncertain whether the prospective site
is a wetland, then several sources are avail-
able to help you make this determination and
define the boundaries of the wetland.
Although this can be a challenging process, it
will help you avoid future liability since fill-
ing a wetland without the appropriate federal,
state, or local permits would be a violation of
many laws. It might be possible to learn the
extent of wetlands without performing a new
delineation, since many wetlands have previ-
ously been mapped. The first step, therefore,
should be to determine whether wetlands
information is available for your area.
At the federal level, four agencies are prin-
cipally involved with wetlands identification
and delineation: USAGE, EPA, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). EPA
also has a Wetlands Information Hotline (800
832-7828) and a wetlands Web site at which provides
information about EPAs wetlands program;
facts about wetlands; the laws, regulations,
and guidance affecting wetlands; and science,
education, and information resources for wet-
lands. The local offices of NRCS (in agricul-
tural areas) or regional USAGE Engineer
Divisions and Districts might know whether
wetlands in the vicinity of the potential site
have already been delineated.
Additionally, FWS maintains the National
Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Center,7 from
which you can obtain wetlands mapping for
much of the United States. This mapping,
however, is based on aerial photography,
which is not reliable for specific field deter-
minations. If you have recently purchased
your site, you also might be able to find out
from the previous property owner whether
any delineation has been completed that
might not be on file with these agencies. Even
if existing delineation information for the site
is found, it might still be prudent to contact a
qualified wetlands consultant to verify the
wetland boundaries, especially if the delin-
eation is not a field determination or is more
than a few years old.
If the existence of a wetland is uncertain,
you should obtain a wetlands delineation.
4-8
To contact NWI, write to National Wetlands Inventory Center, 9720 Executive Center Drive, Suite 101,
Monroe Building, St. Petersburg, FL 33702, call 727 570-5400, or fax 727 570-5420. For additional
information online or to search for maps of your area, visit: .
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
This procedure should be performed only by
an individual with experience in performing a
wetlands delineation8 using standard delin-
eation procedures or applicable state or local
delineation standards. The delineation proce-
dure, with which you should become familiar
before hiring a delineator, involves collecting
maps, aerial photographs, plant data, soil sur-
veys, stream gauge data, land use data, and
other information. Note that it is mandatory
that wetlands delineation for CWA Section
404 permitting purposes be conducted in
accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual9
(USAGE, 1991). The manual provides guide-
lines and methods for determining whether
an area is a wetland for purposes of Section
404. A three-parameter approach for assess-
ing the presence and location of hydrophytic
vegetation (i.e., plants that are adapted for life
in saturated soils), wetland hydrology, and
hydric soils is discussed.
What can be done if a
prospective site is in a wetland?
Before constructing a waste management
unit in a wetland area, consider whether you
can locate the unit elsewhere. If an alternative
location can be identified, strongly consider
pursuing such an option, as required by
Section 404 of the CWA. Because wetlands
are important ecosystems that should be pro-
tected, identification of practicable location
alternatives is a necessary first step in the sit-
ing process. Even if no viable alternative loca-
YVcLland
Tamps Ryv, Ftarlda
NWI wetland resource maps like this one show the locations of various different types of
wetlands and are available for many areas.
Source: NWI web site, sample GIS Think Tank maps page, .
Currently, there is no federal certification program. In March 1995, USAGE proposed standards for a
Wetlands Delineator Certification Program (WDCP), but the standards have not been finalized. If the
WDCP standards are finalized and implemented, you should use WDCP-certified wetland consultants.
The 1987 manual can be ordered from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) at 703 605-
6000 or obtained online at .
4-9
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
tions are identified, it might be beneficial to
keep a record of the alternatives investigated,
noting why they were not acceptable. Such
records might be useful during the interac-
tion between facilities, states, and members of
the community.
If no alternatives are available, you should
consult with state and local regulatory agen-
cies concerning wetland permits. Most states
operate permitting programs under the CWA,
and state authorities can guide you through
the permitting process. To obtain a permit,
the state might require that the unit facility
manager assess wetland impacts and then:
• Prevent contamination from leachate
and runoff.
• Minimize dewatering effects.
• Reduce the loss of wetland acreage.
• Protect the waste management unit
against settling.
C. Active Fault Areas
Faults occur when stresses in a geologic
material exceed its ability to withstand these
forces. Areas surrounding faults are subject to
earthquakes and ground failures, such as
landslides or soil liquefaction. Fault move-
ment can directly weaken or destroy struc-
tures, or seismic activity associated with
faulting can cause damage to structures
through vibrations. Structural damage to the
waste management unit could result in the
release of contaminants. In addition, fault
movement might create avenues to ground-
water supplies, increasing the risk of ground-
water contamination.
Liquefaction is another common problem
encountered in areas of seismic activity. The
vibrating motions caused by an earthquake
tend to rearrange the sand grains in soils. If
the grains are saturated, the saturated granu-
lar material turns into a viscous fluid, a
process referred to as liquefaction. This
diminishes the bearing capacity of the soils
and can lead to foundation and slope failures.
To avoid these hazards, do not build or
expand a unit within 200 feet of an active
fault. If it is not possible to site a unit more
than 200 feet from an active fault, you should
design the unit to withstand the potential
ground movement associated with the fault
area. A fault is considered active if there has
been movement along it within the last 10,000
to 12,000 years.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in a fault area?
A series of USGS maps, Preliminary Young
Fault Maps, Miscellaneous Field Investigation
916, identifies active faults.10 These maps,
however, might not be completely accurate
due to recent shifts in fault lines. If a prospec-
tive site is well outside the 200 foot area of
concern, no fault area considerations exist. If
it is unclear how close a prospective site is to
an active fault, further evaluation will be nec-
essary. A geologic reconnaissance of the site
and surrounding areas can be useful in verify-
ing that active faults do not exist at the site.
If a prospective site is in an area known or
suspected to be prone to faulting, you should
conduct a fault characterization to determine
if the site is near a fault. A characterization
includes identifying linear features that sug-
gest the presence of faults within a 3,000-foot
radius of the site. Such features might be
shown or described on maps, aerial pho-
tographs,11 logs, reports, scientific literature,
or insurance claim reports, or identified by a
detailed field reconnaissance of the area.
If the characterization study reveals faults
within 3,000 feet of the proposed unit or lat-
4-10
10 Information about ordering these maps is available by calling 888 ASK-USGS or 703 648-6045.
11 The National Aerial Photographic Program (NAPP) and the National High Altitude Program (NHAP),
both administered by USGS, are sources of aerial photographs. To order from USGS, call 605 594-
6151. For more information, see . Local aerial photography firms and
surveyors are also good sources of information.
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
In this aerial view, the infamous San Andreas
fault slices through the Carrizo Plain east of
San Luis Obispo, California.
Source: USGS.
eral expansion, you should conduct further
investigations to determine whether any of
the faults are active within 200 feet of the
unit. These investigations can involve drilling
and trenching the subsurface to locate fault
zones and evidence of faulting. Perpendicular
trenching should be used on any fault within
200 feet of the proposed unit to examine the
seismic epicenter for indications of recent
movement.
What can be done if a prospective
site is in a fault area?
If an active fault exists on the site where
the unit is planned, consider placing the unit
200 feet back from the fault area. Even with
such setbacks, only place a unit in a fault area
if it is possible to ensure that no damage to
the unit's structural integrity would result. A
setback of less than 200 feet might be ade-
quate if ground movement would not damage
the unit.
If a lateral expansion or a new unit will be
located in an area susceptible to seismic activ-
ity, there are two particularly important issues
to consider: horizontal acceleration and
movement affecting side slopes. Horizontal
acceleration becomes a concern when a loca-
tion analysis reveals that the site is in a zone
with a risk of horizontal acceleration in the
range of 0.1 g to 0.75 g (g = acceleration of
gravity). In these zones, the unit design
should incorporate measures to protect the
unit from potential ground shifts. To address
side slope concerns, you should conduct a
seismic stability analysis to determine the
most effective materials and gradients for pro-
tecting the unit's slopes from any seismic
instabilities. Also, design the unit to with-
stand the impact of vertical accelerations.
If the unit is in an area susceptible to liq-
uefaction, you should consider ground
improvement measures. These measures
include grouting, dewatering, heavy tamping,
and excavation. See Table 1 for examples of
techniques that are currently used.
Additional engineering options for fault
areas include the use of flexible pipes for
runoff and leachate collection, and redundant
containment systems. In the event of founda-
tion soil collapse or heavy shifting, flexible
runoff and leachate collection pipes—along
with a bedding of gravel or permeable materi-
al—can absorb some of the shifting-related
stress to which the pipes are subjected. Also
consider a secondary containment measure,
such as an additional liner system. In earth-
quake-like conditions, a redundancy of this
nature might be necessary to prevent contam-
ination of the surrounding area if the primary
liner system fails.
4-11
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Table 1
Examples of Improvement Techniques for Liquefiable Soil Foundation Conditions
Method Principle Most Suitable Soil Applications
Conditions/Types
Blasting
Vibrocompaction
Compaction piles
Displacement and
compaction grout
Mix-in-place piles
and walls
Heavy tamping
(dynamic
compaction)
Shock waves and vibrations cause
limited liquefaction, displacement,
remolding, and settlement to higher
density
Densification by vibration and
compaction of backfill material of sand
or gravel.
Densification by displacement of pile
volume and by vibration during driving;
increase in lateral effective earth
pressure.
Highly viscous grout acts as radial
hydraulic jack when pumped in under
high pressure.
Lime, cement, or asphalt introduced
through rotating auger or special in-
place mixer.
Repeated application of high- intensity
impacts at surface.
Saturated, clean sands; partly
saturated sands and silts after
flooding.
Cohesionless soils with less
than 20 percent fines.
Loose sandy soils; partly
saturated clayey soils; loess.
All soils.
Sand, silts, and clays; all soft
or loose inorganic soils.
Cohesionless soils best; other
types can also be improved.
Induce liquefaction in controlled and
limited stages and increase relative density
to potentially nonliquefiable range.
Induce liquefaction in controlled and
limited stages and increase relative density
to nonliquefiable condition. The dense
column of backfill provides (a) vertical
support, (b) drainage to relieve pore water
pressure, and (c) shear resistance in hori-
zontal and inclined directions. Used to
stabilize slopes and strengthen potential
failure surfaces.
Useful in soils with fines. Increases relative
density to nonliquefiable condition.
Provides shear resistance in horizontal and
inclined directions. Used to stabilize
slopes and strengthen potential failure
surfaces.
Increase in soil relative density and
horizontal effective stress. Reduce
liquefaction potential. Stabilize the ground
against movement.
Slope stabilization by providing shear
resistance in horizontal and inclined
directions, which strengthens potential
failure surfaces or slip circles. A wall could
be used to confine an area of liquefiable
soil.
Suitable for some soils with fines; usable
above and below water. In Cohesionless
soils, induces liquefaction in controlled
and limited stages and increases relative
density to potentially nonliquefiable range.
Source: RCRA Subtitle D (258) Seismic Design Guidance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facilities. (EPA, 1995c).
D. Seismic Impact Zones
A seismic impact zone is an area having a
2 percent or greater probability that the maxi-
mum horizontal acceleration caused by an
earthquake at the site will exceed 0.1 g in 50
years. This seismic activity can damage
leachate collection and removal systems, leak
detection systems, or other unit structures
through excessive bending, shearing, tension,
and compression. If a unit's structural compo-
nents fail, leachate can contaminate sur-
rounding areas. Therefore, for safety reasons,
it is recommended that a unit not be located
in a seismic impact zone. If a unit must be
sited in a seismic impact zone, the unit
should be designed to withstand earthquake-
related hazards, such as landslides, slope fail-
ures, soil compaction, ground subsidence,
and soil liquefaction.
Additionally, if you build a unit in a seis-
mic impact zone, avoid rock and soil types
that are especially vulnerable to earthquake
shocks. These include very steep slopes of
weak, fractured, and brittle rock or unsaturat-
ed loess,12 which are vulnerable to transient
shocks caused by tensional faulting. Avoid
Loess is a wind-deposited, moisture-deficient silt that tends to compact when wet.
4-12
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
loess and saturated sand as well, because seis-
mic shocks can liquefy them, causing sudden
collapse of structures. Similar effects are possi-
ble in sensitive cohesive soils when natural
moisture exceeds the soil's liquid limit. For a
discussion of liquid limits, refer to the "Soil
Properties" discussion in Chapter 7, Section B
- Designing and Installing Liners. Earthquake-
induced ground vibrations can also compact
loose granular soils. This could result in large
uniform or differential settlements at the
ground surface.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in a seismic
impact zone?
If a prospective site is in an area with no
history of earthquakes, then seismic impact
zone considerations might not exist. If it is
unclear whether the area has a history of seis-
mic activity, then further evaluation will be
necessary. As a first step, consult the USGS
field study map series MF-2120, Probabilistic
Earthquake Acceleration and Velocity Maps for
the United States and Puerto Rico.13 These maps
provide state- and county-specific information
about seismic impact zones. Additional infor-
mation is available from the USGS National
Earthquake Information Center (NEIC),14
which maintains a database of known earth-
quake and fault zones. Further information
concerning the USGS National Seismic Hazard
Mapping Project can be accessed at . USGS's Web site also
allows you to find ground motion hazard
parameters (including peak ground accelera-
tion and spectra acceleration) for your site by
entering a 5 digit ZIP code
, or a latitude-longitude coordinate
pair ).
If a site is or might be in a seismic impact
zone, it is useful to analyze the effects of seis-
mic activity on soils in and under the unit.
Computer software programs are available that
can evaluate soil liquefaction potential
(defined in Section C of this chapter). LIQ-
UFAC, a software program developed by the
Naval Facilities Engineering Command in
Washington, DC, can calculate safety factors
for each soil layer in a given soil profile and
the corresponding one dimensional settle-
ments due to earthquake loading.
What can be done if a
prospective site is in a seismic
impact zone?
If a waste management unit cannot be sited
outside a seismic impact zone, structural com-
ponents of the unit—including liners, leachate
collection and removal systems, and surface-
water control systems—should be designed to
resist the earthquake-related stresses expected
in the local soil. You should consult profes-
sionals experienced in seismic analysis and
13 For information on ordering these maps, call 888 ASK-USGS, write to USGS Information Services, Box
25286, Denver, CO 80225, or fax 303 202-4693. Online information is available at
.
14 To contact NEIC, call 303 273-8500, write to United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake
Information Center, Box 25046, DEC, MS 967, Denver, CO 80225, fax 303 273-8450, or e-mail
sedas@neic.cr.usgs.gov. For online information, visit: .
4-13
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
design to ensure that your unit is designed
appropriately. To determine the potential
effects of seismic activity on a structure, the
seismic design specialist should evaluate soil
behavior with respect to earthquake intensity.
This evaluation should account for soil
strength, degree of compaction, sorting (orga-
nization of the soil particles), saturation, and
peak acceleration of the potential earthquake.
After conducting an evaluation of soil
behavior, choose appropriate earthquake pro-
tection measures. These might include shal-
lower slopes, dike and runoff control designs
using conservative safety factors, and contin-
gency plans or backup systems for leachate
collection if primary systems are disrupted.
Unit components should be able to withstand
the additional forces imposed by an earth-
quake within acceptable margins of safety.
Additionally, well-compacted, cohesionless
embankments or reasonably flat slopes in
insensitive clay (clay that maintains its com-
pression strength when remolded) are less
likely to fail under moderate seismic shocks
(up toO.15g-0.20g). Embankments made
of insensitive, cohesive soils founded on
cohesive soils or rock can withstand even
greater seismic shocks. For earthen embank-
ments in seismic regions, consider designing
the unit with internal drainage and core
materials resistant to fracturing. Also, prior to
or during unit construction in a seismic
impact zone, you should evaluate excavation
slope stability to determine the appropriate
grade of slopes to minimize potential slip.
For landfills and waste piles, using shal-
lower waste side slopes is recommended, as
steep slopes are more vulnerable to slides
and collapse during earthquakes. Use fill
sequencing techniques that avoid concentrat-
ing waste in one area of the unit for an
extended period of time. This prevents waste
pile side slopes from becoming too steep and
unstable and alleviates differential loading of
the foundation components. Placing too
much waste in one area of the unit can lead
to catastrophic shifting during an earthquake
or heavy seismic activity. Shifting of this
nature can cause failure of crucial system
components or of the unit in general.
In addition, seismic impact zones have
design issues in common with fault areas,
especially concerning soil liquefaction and
earthquake-related stresses. To address lique-
faction, consider employing the soil improve-
ment techniques described in Table 1.
Treating liquefiable soils in the vicinity of the
unit will improve foundation stability and
help prevent uneven settling or possible col-
lapse of heavily saturated soils underneath or
near the unit.
To protect against earthquake-related
stresses, consider installing redundant liners
and special leachate collection and removal
system components, such as secondary liner
systems, composite liners, and leak detection
systems combined with a low permeability
soil layer. These measures function as back-
ups to the primary containment and collec-
tion systems and provide a greater margin of
safety for units during possible seismic stress-
es. Examples of special leachate systems
include high-strength, flexible materials for
leachate containment systems; geomembrane
liner systems underlying leachate contain-
ment systems; and perforated polyvinyl chlo-
ride or high-density polyethylene piping in a
bed of gravel or other permeable material.
E. Unstable Areas
Siting in unstable areas should be avoided
because these locations are susceptible to nat-
urally occurring or human-induced events or
forces capable of impairing the integrity of a
waste management unit. Naturally occurring
unstable areas include regions with poor soil
foundations, regions susceptible to mass
movement, or regions containing karst ter-
4-14
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
rain, which can include hidden sinkholes.
Unstable areas caused by human activity can
include areas near cut or fill slopes, areas
with excessive drawdown of ground water,
and areas where significant quantities of oil
or natural gas have been extracted. If it is
necessary to site a waste management unit in
an unstable area, technical and construction
techniques should be considered to mitigate
against potential damage.
The three primary types of failure that can
occur in an unstable area are settlement, loss
of bearing strength, and sinkhole collapse.
Settlement can result from soil compression if
your unit is, or will be located in, an unstable
area over a thick, extensive clay layer. The
unit's weight can force water from the com-
pressible clay, compacting it and allowing the
unit to settle. Settlement can increase as
waste volume increases and can result in
structural failure of the unit if it was not
properly engineered. Settlement beneath a
waste management unit should be assessed
and compared to the elongation strength and
flexibility properties of the liner and leachate
collection pipe system. Even small amounts
of settlement can seriously damage leachate
collection piping and sumps. A unit should
be engineered to minimize the impacts of set-
tlement if it is, or will be in an unstable area.
Loss of bearing strength is a failure mode
that occurs in soils that tend to expand and
rapidly settle or liquefy. Soil contractions and
expansions can increase the risk of leachate or
waste release. Another example of loss of bear-
ing strength occurs when excavation near the
unit reduces the mass of soil at the toe of the
slope, thereby reducing the overall strength
(resisting force) of the foundation soil.
Catastrophic collapse in the form of sink-
holes can occur in karst terrain. As water,
especially acidic water, percolates through
limestone, the soluble carbonate material dis-
solves, leaving cavities and caverns. Land
overlying caverns can collapse suddenly,
resulting in sinkholes that can be more than
100 feet deep and 300 feet wide.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in an
unstable area?
If a stability assessment has not been per-
formed on a potential site, you should have a
qualified professional conduct one before
designing a waste management unit on the
prospective site. The qualified professional
should assess natural conditions, such as soil
geology and geomorphology as well as
human-induced surface and subsurface fea-
tures or events that could cause differential
ground settlement. Naturally unstable condi-
tions can become more unpredictable and
destructive if amplified by human-induced
changes to the environment. If a unit is to be
built at an assessed site that exhibits stability
problems, tailor the design to account for any
instability detected. A stability assessment
typically includes the following steps:
Screen for expansive soils. Expansive
soils can lose their ability to support a foun-
dation when subjected to certain natural or
human-induced events, such as heavy rain or
explosions. Expansive soils usually are clay-
rich and, because of their molecular struc-
ture, tend to swell and shrink by taking up
and releasing water. Such soils include smec-
tite (montmorillonite group) and vermiculite
clays. In addition, soils rich in white alkali
(sodium sulfate), anhydrite (calcium sulfate),
or pyrite (iron sulfide) can also swell as water
content increases. These soils are more com-
mon in the arid western states.
Check for soil subsidence. Soils subject
to rapid subsidence include loesses, uncon-
solidated clays, and wetland soils. Unconsol-
idated clays can undergo considerable
compaction when oil or water is removed.
Similarly, wetland soils, which by their
4-15
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Sinkholes, like this one that occurred just north of Orlando, Florida in 1981, are a risk of
development in Karst terrain. Left: aerial view (note baseball diamond for scale); right:
ground-level view. Photos courtesy of City of Winter Park, Florida public relations office.
nature are water-bearing, are also subject to
subsidence when water is withdrawn.
Look for areas subject to mass move-
ment or slippage. Such areas are often situ-
ated on slopes and tend to have rock or soil
conditions conducive to downhill sliding.
Examples of mass movements include
avalanches, landslides, and rock slides. Some
sites might require cutting or rilling slopes
during construction. Such activities can cause
existing soil or rock to slip.
Search for karst terrain. Karst features
are areas containing soluble bedrock, such as
limestone or dolomite, that have been dis-
solved and eroded by water, leaving charac-
teristic physiographic features including
sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, large
springs, and blind valleys. The principal con-
cern with karst terrains is progressive or cata-
strophic subsurface failure due to the
presence of sinkholes, solution cavities, and
subterranean caverns. Karst features can also
hamper detection and control of leachate,
which can move rapidly through hidden con-
duits beneath the unit. Karst maps, such as
Engineering Aspects of Karst, Scale 1:7,500,000,
Map No. 38077-AW-NA-07M-00, produced by
the USGS15 and state specific geological maps
can be reviewed to identify karst areas.
Scan for evidence of excessive ground-
water drawdown or oil and gas extraction.
Removing underground water can increase
the effective overburden on the foundation
soils underneath the unit. Excessive draw-
down of water might cause settlement or
bearing capacity
failure on the
foundation soils.
Extraction of oil
or natural gas
can have similar
effects.
Investigate
the geotechnical
and geological
characteristics
of the site. It is
important to
establish soil
strengths and
other engineer-
ing properties. A
geotechnical
engineering con-
Subsidence, slippage, and
other kinds of slope failure
can damage structures.
4-16
15 For information on ordering this map, call 888 ASK-USGS, write USGS Information Services,
Box 25286, Denver, CO 80255, or fax 303 202-4693. Online information is available at
.
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
sultant can accomplish this by performing
standard penetration tests, field vane shear
tests, and laboratory tests. This information
will determine how large a unit you can safely
place on the site. Other soil properties to
examine include water content, shear
strength, plasticity, and grain size distribution.
Examine the liquefaction potential. It is
extremely important to ascertain the liquefaction
potential of embankments, slopes, and founda-
tion soils. Refer to Section C of this chapter for
more information about liquefiable soils.
What can be done if a
prospective site is in an
unstable area?
It is advisable not to locate or expand your
waste management unit in an unstable area. If
your unit is or will be located in such an area,
you should safeguard the structural integrity
of the unit by incorporating appropriate mea-
sures into the design. The integrity of the unit
might be jeopardized if this is not done.
For example, to safeguard the structural
integrity of side slopes in an unstable area,
reduce slope height, flatten slope angle, exca-
vate a bench in the upper portion of the slope,
or buttress slopes with compacted earth or rock
fill. Alternatively, build retaining structures,
such as retaining walls or slabs and piles. Other
approaches include the use of geotextiles and
geogrids to provide additional strength, wick
and toe drains to relieve excess pore pressures,
grouting, and vacuum and wellpoint pumping
to lower ground- water levels. In addition, sur-
face drainage can be controlled to decrease
infiltration, thereby reducing the potential for
mud and debris slides.
Additional engineering concerns arise in
the case of waste management units in areas
containing karst terrain. The principal con-
cern with karst terrains is progressive or cata-
strophic subsurface failure due to the
presence of sinkholes, solution cavities, and
subterranean caverns. Extensive subsurface
characterization studies should be completed
before designing and building in these areas.
Subsurface drilling, sinkhole monitoring, and
geophysical testing are direct means that can
be used to characterize a site. Geophysical
techniques include electromagnetic conduc-
tivity, seismic refraction, ground-penetrating
radar, and electrical resistivity (see the box
below for more information). More than one
technique should be used to confirm and cor-
relate findings and anomalies, and a qualified
geophysicist should interpret the results of
these investigations.
Remote sensing techniques, such as aerial
photograph interpretation, can also provide
additional information on karst terrains.
Surface mapping can help provide an under-
standing of structural patterns and relation-
ships in karst terrains. An understanding of
local carbonate geology and stratigraphy can
help with the interpretation of both remote
sensing and geophysical data.
You should incorporate adequate engineer-
ing controls into any waste management unit
located in a karst terrain. In areas where karst
development is minor, loose soils overlying
the limestone can be excavated or heavily
compacted to achieve the needed stability.
Similarly, in areas where the karst voids are
relatively small, the voids can be filled with
slurry cement grout or other material.
Engineering solutions can compensate for
the weak geologic structures by providing
ground supports. For example, ground modi-
fications, such as grouting or reinforced raft
foundations, could compensate for a lack of
ground strength in some karst areas. Raft
constructions, which are floating foundations
consisting of a concrete footing extending
over a very large area, reduce and evenly dis-
tribute waste loads where soils have a low
bearing capacity or where soil conditions are
variable and erratic. Note, however, that raft
foundations might not always prevent the
4-17
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Geophysical Techniques
Electromagnetic Conductivity or
Electromagnetic Induction (EMI). A transmitter
coil generates an electromagnetic field which
induces eddy currents in the earth located below
the transmitter. These eddy currents create sec-
ondary electromagnetic fields which are measured
by a receiver coil. The receiver coil produces an out-
put voltage that can be related to subsurface con-
ductivity variations. Analysis of these variations
allows users to map subsurface features, stratigraph-
ic profiles, and the existence of buried objects.
Seismic Refraction. An artificial seismic source
(e.g., hammer, explosives) creates compression
waves that are refracted as they travel along geologic
boundaries. These refracted waves are detected by
electromechanical transducers (geophones) which
are attached to a seismograph that records the time
of arrival of all waves (refracted and non-refracted).
These travel times are compared and analyzed to
identify the number of stratigraphic layers and the
depth of each layer.
Ground-Penetrating Radar. A transmitting
antenna dragged along the surface of the ground
radiates short pulses of high-frequency radio
waves into the ground. Subsurface structures
reflect these waves which are recorded by a
receiving antenna. The variations in reflected
return signals are used to generate an image or
map of the subsurface structure.
Electrical Resistivity. An electrical current is
injected into the ground by a pair of surface elec-
trodes (called the current electrodes). By measuring
the resulting voltage (potential field) between a sec-
ond pair of electrodes (called the potential elec-
trodes), the resistivity of subsurface materials is
measured. The measured resistivity is then com-
pared to known values for different soil and rock
types. Increasing the distance between the two pairs
of electrodes increases the depth of measurement.
extreme collapse and settlement that can
occur in karst areas. In addition, due to the
unpredictable and catastrophic nature of
ground failure in unstable areas, the con-
struction of raft foundations and other
ground modifications tends to be complex
and can be costly, depending on the size of
the area.
F. Airport Vicinities
The vicinity of an airport includes not only
the facility itself, but also large reserved open
areas beyond the ends of runways. If a unit is
intended to be sited near an airport, there are
particular issues that take on added impor-
tance in such areas. You should familiarize
yourself with Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) regulations and guidelines. The prima-
ry concern associated with waste management
units near airports is the hazard posed to air-
craft by birds, which often feed at units man-
aging putrescible waste. Planes can lose
propulsion when birds are sucked into jet
engines, and can sustain other damage in col-
lisions with birds. Industrial waste manage-
ment units that do not receive putrescible
wastes should not have a problem with birds.
Another area of concern for landfills and
waste piles near airports is the height of the
accumulated waste. If you own or operate
such a unit, you should exercise caution
when managing waste above ground level.
How is it determined if a
prospective site will be located
too close to an airport?
If the prospective site is not located near
any airports, additional evaluation is not nec-
essary. If there is uncertainty whether the
prospective site is located near an airport,
obtain local maps of the area using the various
Internet resources previously discussed or
from state and local regulatory agencies to
identify any nearby public-use airports.
4-18
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Topographic maps available from USGS are
also suitable for determining airport locations.
If necessary, FAA can provide information on
the location of all public-use airports. In accor-
dance with FAA guidance, if a new unit or an
expansion of an existing unit will be within 5
miles of the end of a public-use airport run-
way, the affected airport and the regional FAA
office should be notified to provide them an
opportunity for review and comment.
What can be done if a
prospective site is in an
airport vicinity?
If a proposed waste management unit or a
lateral expansion is to be located within
10,000 feet of an airport used by jet aircraft
or within 5,000 feet of an airport used only
by piston-type aircraft, design and operate
your unit so it does not pose a bird hazard to
aircraft. For above-ground units, design and
operate your unit so it does not interfere
with flight patterns. If it appears that height
is a potential concern, consider entrenching
the unit or choosing a site outside the air-
port's flight patterns. Most nonhazardous
industrial waste management units do not
usually manage wastes that are attractive
food sources for birds, but if your unit han-
dles waste that potentially attracts birds, take
precautions to prevent birds from becoming
an aircraft hazard. Discourage congregation
of birds near your unit by preventing water
from collecting on site; eliminating or cover-
ing wastes that might serve as a source of
food; using visual deterrents, including real-
istic models of the expected scavenger birds'
natural predators; employing sound deter-
rents, such as cannon sounds, distress calls
of scavenger birds, or the sounds of the
birds' natural predators; removing nesting
and roosting areas (unless such removal is
prohibited by the Endangered Species Act);
or constructing physical barriers, such as a
canopy of fine wires or nets strung around
the disposal and storage areas when practical
or technically feasible.
G. Wellhead Protection
Areas
Wellhead protection involves protecting
the ground-water resources that supply pub-
lic drinking water systems. A wellhead pro-
tection area (WHPA) is the area most
susceptible to contamination surrounding a
wellhead. WHPAs are designated and often
regulated to prevent public drinking water
sources from becoming contaminated. The
technical definition, delineation, and regula-
tion of WHPAs vary from state to state. You
should contact your state or local regulatory
agency to determine what wellhead protec-
tion measures are in place near prospective
sites. Section II of this chapter provides
examples of how some states specify mini-
mum allowable distances between waste
management units and public water supplies,
as well as drinking water wells. Locating a
waste management unit in a WHPA can cre-
ate a potential avenue for drinking water con-
tamination through accidental release of
leachate, contaminated runoff, or waste. In
addition, some states might have additional
restrictions for areas in designated "sole
source aquifier" systems.
How is it determined if a
prospective site is in a wellhead
protection area?
A list of state wellhead protection program
contacts is available on EPA's Web site at
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
What can be done if a
prospective site is in a wellhead
protection area?
If a new waste management unit or lateral
expansion will be located in a WHPA or sus-
pected WHPA, consider design modifications
to help prevent any ground-water contami-
nation. For waste management units placed
in these areas, work with state regulatory
agencies to ensure that appropriate ground-
water barriers are installed between the unit
and the ground-water table. These barriers
should be designed using materials of
extremely low permeability such as
geomembrane liners or low permeability soil
liners. The purpose of such barriers is to
prevent any waste, or leachate that has per-
colated through the waste, from reaching the
ground water and possibly affecting the pub-
lic drinking water source.
In addition to ground-water barriers, the
use of leachate collection, leak detection, and
runoff control systems should also be consid-
ered. Leachate contamination is possibly the
greatest threat to a public ground-water sup-
ply posed by a waste management unit.
Incorporation of leachate collection, leak
detection, and runoff control systems should
further prevent any leachate from escaping
into the ground water. Further discussion
concerning liner systems, leachate collection
and removal systems, and leak detection sys-
tems is included in Chapter 7, Section
B-Designing and Installing Liners.
Control systems that separate storm-water
run-on from any water that has contacted
waste should also be considered. Proper con-
trol measures that redirect storm water to the
supply source area should help alleviate this
tendency. For additional information con-
cerning storm water run-on and runoff con-
trol systems, refer to Chapter 6-Protecting
Surface Water.
II. Buffer Zone
Considerations
Many states require buffer zones between
waste management units and other nearby
land uses, such as schools. The size of a
buffer zone often depends on the type of
waste management unit and the land use of
the surrounding areas. You should consult
with state regulatory agencies and local advi-
sory boards about buffer zone requirements
before constructing a new unit or expanding
an existing unit. A summary of state buffer
zone requirements is included in the appen-
dix at the end of this chapter.
Buffer zones provide you with time and
space to mitigate situations where accidental
releases might cause adverse human health or
environmental impacts. The size of the buffer
zone will be directly related to the intended
benefit. These zones provide four primary
benefits:
• Maintenance of quality of the sur-
rounding ground water.
• Prevention of contaminant migration
off site.
• Protection of drinking water sup-
plies.
• Minimization of nuisance conditions
perceived in surrounding areas.
Protection of ground water will likely be
the primary concern for all involved parties.
You should ensure that materials processed
and disposed at your unit are isolated from
ground-water resources. Placing your unit
further from the water table and potential
receptors, and increasing the number of
physical barriers between your unit and the
water table and potential receptors, provides
for ground-water protection. It is therefore
advised that, in addition to incorporating a
liner system, where necessary, into a waste
4-20
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
School
Many nearby areas and land uses, such as
schools, call for consideration of buffer zones.
management unit's design, you select a site
where an adequate distance separates the bot-
tom of a unit from the ground-water table.
(See the appendix for a summary of these
minimum separation distances.)16 In the event
of a release, this separation distance will
allow for corrective action and natural attenu-
ation to protect ground water.17
Additionally, in the event of an unplanned
release, an adequate buffer zone will allow
time for remediation activities to control con-
taminants before they reach sensitive areas.
Buffer zones also provide additional protec-
tion for drinking water supplies. Drinking
water supplies include ground water, individ-
ual and community wells, lakes, reservoirs,
and municipal water treatment facilities.
Finally, buffer zones help maintain good
relations with the surrounding community by
protecting surrounding areas from any noise,
particulate emissions, and odor associated
with your unit. Buffer zones also help to pre-
vent access by unauthorized people. For units
located near property boundaries, houses, or
historic areas, trees or earthen berms can pro-
vide a buffer to reduce noise and odors.
Planting trees around a unit can also improve
the aesthetics of a unit, obstruct any view of
unsightly waste, and help protect property
values in the surrounding community. When
planting trees as a buffer, place them so that
their roots will not damage the unit's liner or
final cover.
A. Recommended Buffer
Zones
You should check with state and local offi-
cials to determine what buffer zones might
apply to your waste management unit. Areas
for which buffer zones are recommended
include property boundaries, drinking water
wells, other sources of water, and adjacent
houses or buildings.
Property boundaries. To minimize
adverse effects on adjacent properties, consid-
er incorporating a buffer zone or separation
distance into unit design. You should consid-
er planting trees or bushes to provide a nat-
ural buffer between your unit and adjacent
properties.
Drinking water wells, surface-water
bodies, and public water supplies. Locating
a unit near or within the recharge area for
sole source aquifers and major aquifers,
coastal areas, surface-water bodies, or public
water supplies, such as a community well or
water treatment facility, also raises concerns.
Releases from a waste management unit can
pose serious threats to human health not only
where water is used for drinking, but also
where surface waters are used for recreation.
16 A detailed discussion of technical considerations concerning the design and installation of liner sys-
tems, both in situ soil liners and synthetic liners, is included in Chapter 7, Section B - Designing and
Installing Liners.
17 Natural attenuation can be defined as chemical and biological processes that reduce contaminant con-
centrations.
4-21
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Houses or buildings. Waste management
units can present noise, odor, and dust prob-
lems for residents or businesses located on
adjacent property, thereby diminishing prop-
erty values. Additionally, proximity to proper-
ty boundaries can invite increased
trespassing, vandalism, and scavenging.
B. Additional Buffer Zones
There are several other areas for which to
consider establishing buffer zones, including
critical habitats, park lands, public roads, and
historic or archaeological sites.
Critical habitats. These are geographical
areas occupied by endangered or threatened
species. These areas contain physical or bio-
logical features essential to the proliferation of
the species. When designing a unit near a
critical habitat, it is imperative that the criti-
cal habitat be conserved. A buffer zone can
help prevent the destruction or adverse modi-
fication of a critical habitat and minimize
harm to endangered or threatened species.18
Park lands. A buffer between your unit
and park boundaries helps maintain the aes-
thetics of the park land. Park lands provide
recreational opportunities and a natural
refuge for wildlife. Locating a unit too close
to these areas can disrupt recreational quali-
ties and natural wildlife patterns.
Public roads. A buffer zone will help
reduce unauthorized access to the unit,
reduce potential odor concerns, and improve
aesthetics for travelers on the nearby road.
Historic or archaeological sites. A waste
management unit located in close proximity
to one of these sites can adversely impact the
aesthetic quality of the site. These areas
include historic settlements, battlegrounds,
cemeteries, and Indian burial grounds. Also
check whether a prospective site itself has
historical or archaeological significance.
Buffer zones can help protect endangered
species and their habitats.
Historic sites call for careful consideration
of buffer zones.
In summary, it is important to check with
local authorities to ensure that placement of
a new waste management unit or lateral
expansion of an existing unit will not conflict
with any local buffer zone criteria. You
should also review any relevant state or tribal
4-22
18 For the full text of the Endangered Species Act, visit the U.S. House of Representatives Internet Law
Library Web site at , under Title 16, Chapter 35.
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
regulations that specify buffer zones for your
unit. For units located near any sensitive
areas as described in this section, consider
measures to minimize any possible health,
environmental, and nuisance impacts.
Local Land Use
and Zoning
Considerations
In addition to location and buffer zone
considerations, become familiar with any
local land use and zoning requirements. Local
governments often classify the land within
their communities into areas, districts, or
zones. These zones can represent different
use categories, such as residential, commer-
cial, industrial, or agricultural. You should
consider the compatibility of a planned new
unit or a planned lateral expansion with near-
by existing and future land use, and contact
local authorities early in the siting process.
Local planning, zoning, or public works offi-
cials can discuss with you the development of
a unit, compliance with local regulations, and
available options. Local authorities might
impose conditions for protecting adjacent
properties from potential adverse impacts
from the unit.
Addressing local land use and zoning
issues during the siting process can prevent
these issues from becoming prominent con-
cerns later. Land use and zoning restrictions
often address impacts on community and
recreational areas, historical areas, and other
critical areas. You should consider the prox-
imity of a new unit or lateral expansion to
such areas and evaluate any potential adverse
effects it might have on these areas. For
example, noise, dust, fumes, and odors from
construction and operation of a unit could be
considered a nuisance and legal action could
be brought by local authorities or nearby
property owners.
In situations where land use and zoning
restrictions might cause difficulties in expand-
ing or siting a unit, work closely with local
authorities to learn about local land use and
zoning restrictions and minimize potential
problems. Misinterpreting or ignoring such
restrictions can cause complications with
intended development schedules or designs.
In many cases, the use of vegetation, fences,
or walls to screen your activities can reduce
impacts on nearby properties. In addition, it
might be possible to request amendments,
rezonings, special exceptions, or variances to
restrictions. These administrative mechanisms
allow for flexibility in use and development of
land. Learning about local requirements as
early as possible in the process will maximize
the time available to apply for variances or
rezoning permits, or to incorporate screening
into the plans for your unit.
IV. Environmental
Justice
Considerations
In the past several years, there has been
growing recognition from communities and
federal and state governments that some
socioeconomic and racial groups might bear a
disproportionate burden of adverse environ-
mental effects from waste management activi-
ties. President Clinton issued Executive Order
12898, Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations, on
February 11, 1994.19 To be consistent with
the definition of environmental justice in this
executive order, you should identify and
address, as appropriate, disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environ-
mental effects of waste management pro-
19 For the full text of Presidential Executive Order No. 12898 and additional information concerning
environmental justice issues go to EPA's Web site at
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
grams, policies, and activities on minority
and low-income populations.
One of the criticisms made by advocates of
environmental justice is that local communi-
ties endure the potential health and safety
risks associated with waste management
units without enjoying any of the economic
benefits. During unit siting or expansion,
address environmental justice concerns in a
manner that is most appropriate for the oper-
ations, the community, and the state or tribal
government.
You should look for opportunities to mini-
mize environmental impacts, improve the
surrounding environment, and pursue
opportunities to make the waste management
facility an asset to the community. When
planning these opportunities, it is beneficial
to maintain a relationship with all involved
parties based on honesty and integrity, utilize
cross-cultural formats and exchanges, and
recognize industry, state, and local knowl-
edge of the issues. It is also important to take
advantage of all potential opportunities for
developing partnerships.
Examples of activities that incorporate
environmental justice issues include tailoring
activities to specific needs; providing inter-
preters, if appropriate; providing multilingual
materials; and promoting the formation of a
community/state advisory panel.
Tailor the public involvement activities
to the specific needs. Good public involve-
ment programs are site-specific—they take
into account the needs of the facility, neigh-
borhood, and state. There is no such thing
as a "one-size-fits-all" public involvement
program. Listening to each other carefully
will identify the specific environmental jus-
tice concerns and determine the involve-
ment activities most appropriate to address
those needs.
Provide interpreters for public meetings.
Interpreters can be used to ensure the infor-
mation is exchanged. Provide interpreters, as
needed, for the hearing impaired and for any
languages, other than English, spoken by a
significant percentage of the audience.
Provide multilingual fact sheets and
other information. Public notices and fact
sheets should be distributed in as many lan-
guages as necessary to ensure that all inter-
ested parties receive necessary information.
Fact sheets should be available for the visual-
ly impaired in the community on tape, in
large print, or braille.
Promote the formation of a community/
state advisory panel to serve as the voice of
the community. The Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality, for example,
encourages the creation of environmental jus-
tice panels comprised of community mem-
bers, industry, and state representatives. The
panels meet monthly to discuss environmen-
tal justice issues and find solutions to any
concerns identified by the group.
4-24
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Considering the Site Activity List
General Siting Considerations
Q Check to see if the proposed unit site is:
— In a 100-year floodplain.
— In or near a wetland area.
— Within 200 leet ol an active fault.
— In a seismic impact zone.
— In an unstable area.
— Close to an airport.
— Within a wellhead protection area.
Q If the proposed unit site is in any of these areas:
— Design the unit to account for the area's characteristics and minimize the unit's impacts on
such areas.
— Consider siting the unit elsewhere.
Buffer Zone Considerations
(Note that many states require buffer zones between waste management units and other nearby land
uses.)
Q Check to see if the proposed unit site is near:
— The ground-water table.
— A property boundary.
— A drinking water well.
— A public water supply such as a community well, reservoir, or water treatment facility.
— A surface-water body, such as a lake, stream, river, or pond.
— Houses or other buildings.
— Critical habitats for endangered or threatened species.
— Park lands.
— A public road.
— Historic or archaeological sites.
Q If the proposed unit site is near any of these areas or land uses, determine how large a buffer zone,
if any, is appropriate between the unit and the area or land use.
4-25
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Considering the Site Activity List (cont.)
Local Land Use and Zoning Considerations
Q Contact local planning, zoning, and public works agencies to discuss restrictions that apply to the
unit.
Q Comply with any applicable restrictions, or obtain the necessary variances or special exceptions.
Environmental Justice Considerations
Q Determine whether minority or low-income populations would bear a disproportionate burden of
any environmental effects of the unit's waste management activities.
Q Work with the local community to devise strategies to minimize any potentially disproportionate
burdens.
4-26
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Resources
Bagchi, A. 1994. Design, Construction, and Monitoring of Landfills. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Das, B. M. 1990. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. How to Read a Flood Insurance Map. Web Site:
Federal Emergency Management Agency. The National Flood Insurance Program Community Status Book.
Web Site:
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1995. The Zone A Manual: Managing Floodplain Development in
Approximate Zone A Areas. FEMA 265.
Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources. 1990. Municipal Solid Waste Management Options:
Volume II: Landfills.
Law, J., C. Leung, P. Mandeville, and A. H. Wu. 1996. A Case Study of Determining Liquefaction Potential of
a New Landfill Site in Virginia by Using Computer Modeling. Presented at WasteTech '95, New Orleans, LA
(January).
Noble, George. 1992. Siting Landfills and Other LULUs. Technomic Publications.
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 1996. Wellhead Protection Facts. Web Site:
.
Terrene Institute. 1996. American Wetlands: A Reason to Celebrate.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. 1983. Industrial Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1995. Engineering and Design: Design and Construction of Conventionally
Reinforced Ribbed Mat Slabs (RRMS). ETL 1110-3-471.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1995. Engineering and Design: Geomembranes for Waste Containment
Applications. ETL 1110-1-172.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. Engineering and Design: Bearing Capacity of Soils. EM 1110-1-1905.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. Engineering and Design: Design and Construction of Grouted Riprap.
ETL 1110-2-334.
4-27
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Resources (cont.)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1991. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
HQUSACE.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1984. Engineering and Design: Use of Geotextiles Under Riprap. ETL
1110-2-286.
U.S. EPA. 2000a. Social Aspects of Siting RCRA Hazardous Waste Facilities. EPA530-K-00-005.
U.S. EPA. 2000b. Siting of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities and Public Opposition. EPAOSW-0-00-809.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Sensitive Environments and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.
EPA530-K-9 7-003.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. EPA540-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Decision-Maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management, 2nd Ed. EPA530-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. RCRA Subtitle D (258) Seismic Design Guidance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
Facilities. EPA600-R-95-051.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. Why Do Wellhead Protection? Issues and Answers in Protecting Public Drinking Water
Supply Systems. EPA813-K-95-001.
U. S. EPA. 1994. Handbook: Ground Water and Wellhead Protection. EPA625-R-94-001.
U. S. EPA. 1993a. Guidelines for Delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas. EPA440-5-93-001.
U.S. EPA. 1993b. Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual. EPA530-R-93-017.
U. S. EPA. 1992. Final Comprehensive State Ground-Water Protection Program Guidance. EPA100-R-93-001.
U. S. EPA. 1991. Protecting Local Ground-Water Supplies Through Wellhead Protection. EPA570-09-91-007.
U. S. EPA. 1988. Developing a State Wellhead Protection Program: A User's Guide to Assist State Agencies
Under the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA440-6-88-003.
U.S. Geological Survey. Preliminary Young Fault Maps, Miscellaneous Field Investigation 916.
4-28
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Resources (cont.)
U.S. Geological Survey. Probabilistic Acceleration and Velocity Maps for the United States and Puerto Rico.
Map Series MF-2120.
U.S. House of Representatives. 1996. Endangered Species Act. Internet Law Library. Web Site:
.
University of Illinois Center for Solid Waste Management and Research, Office of Technology Transfer. 1990.
Municipal solid waste landfills: Volume II: Technical issues.
University of Illinois Center for Solid Waste Management and Research, Office of Technology Transfer. 1989.
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Vol. I: General Issues.
White House. Executive Order 12898 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations.
4-29
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Appendix: State Buffer Zone Considerations
The universe of industrial wastes and unit types is broad and diverse. States have established
various approaches to address location considerations for the variety of wastes and units in
their states. The tables below summarize the range of buffer zone restrictions and most com-
mon buffer zone values specified for each unit type by some states to address their local con-
cerns. The numbers in the tables are not meant to advocate the adoption of a buffer zone of
any particular distance; rather, they serve only as examples of restrictions states have individu-
ally developed.
• Surface impoundments. Restrictions with respect to buffer zones vary among states.
In addition, states allow exemptions or variances to these buffer zone restrictions on a
case-by-case basis. Table 1 presents the range of values and the most common value
used by states for each buffer zone category.
Table 1
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Surface Impoundments
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values —
distance (number
with this common
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Roads
1 to 15 feet
100 to 200 feet
1,2 00 to 1,320 feet
500 to 1,320 feet
100 to 1,320 feet
300 to 1,320 feet
1,000 feet
minimum Most Common Value (number of
of states states with this common value)
value)
(4)
(4)
(2)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(1)
5 feet
100 feet
1,2 00 feet
1 ,320 feet
1,320 feet
100 feet
1 ,320 feet
1,000 feet
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
4-30
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Landfills. Table 2 presents the range of values and the most common state buffer zone
restrictions for landfills.
Table 2
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Landfills
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values — minimum Most Common Value (number of
distance (number of states with states with this common value)
this common value)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Roads
Park Land
Fault Areas
1 to 15 feet
20 to 600 feet
500 to 1 ,320 feet
400 to 5, 280 feet
100 to 2, 000 feet
200 to 1,320 feet
50 to 1,000 feet
1,000 to 5, 280 feet
200 feet
(12)
(14)
(9)
(13)
(20)
(14)
(8)
(7)
(2)
5 feet
100 feet
500 feet
600 feet
1,200 feet
1,200 feet
100 feet
1,000 feet
500 feet
1,000 feet
1,000 feet
200 feet
(4)
(7)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(5)
(7)
(5)
(4)
(2)
4-31
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Waste Piles. Table 3 presents the state buffer zone restrictions for waste piles. Of the
four states with buffer zone restrictions, only two states specified minimum distances.
Table 3
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Waste Piles
Buffer Zone Category
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings or
Recreational Area
Historic Archeological Site
or Critical Habitat
Range of Values-minimum
distance (number of states
with this common value)
4 feet*
50 feet
50 feet
200 feet
Minimum distance
not specified
(1)
Most Common Value (number of
states with this common value)
4 feet*
50 feet
50 feet
200 feet
Minimum distance
not specified
(1)
* If no liner or storage pad is used, then this state requires four feet between the waste and
the seasonal high water table.
4-32
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Land Application.20 Table 4 presents the range of values and the most common state
buffer zone restrictions for land application.
Table 4
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Land Application
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values-minimum Most Common Value (number of
distance (number of states with states with this common value)
this common value)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Park Land
Fault Areas
Max. Depth of Treatment
Pipelines
Critical Habitat
Soil Conditions
4 to 5 feet
50 to 200 feet
200 to 500 feet
300 to 5,280 feet
100 to 1,000 feet
200 to 3,000 feet
2, 640 feet
200 feet
5 feet
25 feet
No minimum distance set
(3)
(4)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
Not on frozen, ice or snow (1)
covered, or water saturated soils
4 feet
5 feet
50 feet
200 feet
500 feet
300 feet
1 ,000 feet
5, 280 feet
100 feet
300 feet
500 feet
2, 640 feet
200 feet
5 feet
25 feet
No minimum distance set
(1)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
Not on frozen, ice or snow (1)
covered, or water saturated soils
20 In the review of state regulations performed to develop Table 5, it was not possible to distinguish
between units used for treatment and units where wastes are added as a soil amendment. It is recom-
mended that you consult applicable state agencies to determine which buffer zone restrictions are rele-
vant to your land application unit.
4-33
-------
Getting Started—Considering the Site
Based on the review of state requirements, Table 5 presents the most common buffer zones
restrictions across all four unit types.
Table 5
Common Buffer Zone Restrictions Across All Four Unit Types
Buffer Zone Category Most Common Values
(total number of states for all unit types) (number of states with this common value)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
(20)
(23)
(13)
(20)
(30)
(25)
4 feet
5 feet
50 feet
100 feet
500 feet
1,000 feet
1,200 feet
5, 280 feet
100 feet
200 feet
1,000 feet
500 feet
(4)
(4)
(8)
(5)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(5)
(5)
(7)
(9)
4-34
-------
Part
Protecting Air Quality
Chapter 5
Protecting Air Quality
-------
-------
Contents
I. Federal Airborne Emission Control Programs 5-3
A. National Ambient Air Quality Standards 5-3
B. New Source Performance Standards 5-3
C. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 5-4
D. Title V Operating Permits 5-10
E. Federal Airborne Emission Regulations for Solid Waste Management Activities 5-10
1. Hazardous Waste Management Unit Airborne Emission Regulations 5-10
2. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Airborne Emission Regulations 5-10
3. Offsite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP 5-11
F A Decision Guide to Applicable CAA Requirements 5-12
1. Determine Emissions from the Unit 5-12
2. Is the Waste Management Unit Part of an Industrial Facility Which Is Subject to a CAA
Title V Opening Permit? 5-14
3. Conduct a Risk Evaluation Using One of the Following Options: 5-17
II. Assessing Risk 5-17
A. Assessing Risks Associated with Inhalation of Ambient Air 5-17
B. IWAIR Model 5-21
1. Emissions Model 5-21
2. Dispersion Model 5-21
3. Risk Model 5-23
4. Estimation Process 5-23
5. Capabilities and Limitations of the Model 5-27
C. Site-specific Risk Analysis 5-28
III. Emission Control Techniques 5-32
A. Controlling Particulate Matter 5-32
1. Vehicular Operations 5-32
2. Waste Placement and Handling 5-33
3. Wind Erosion 5-35
B. VOC Emission Control Techniques 5-36
1. Choosing a Site to Minimize Airborne Emission Problems 5-36
2. Pretreatment of Waste 5-36
3. Enclosure of Units 5-36
4. Treatment of Captured VOCs 5-37
5. Special Considerations for Land Application Units 5-38
Protecting Air Activity List 5-39
-------
Contents
Resources 5-40
Figures:
Figure 1. Evaluating VOC Emission Risk 5-13
Figure 2. Conceptual Site Diagram 5-18
Figure 3. Emissions from WMU 5-19
Figure 4. Forces That Affect Contaminant Plumes 5-20
Figure 5. IWAIR Approach for Developing Risk or Protective Waste Concentrations 5-24
Figure 6. Screen 1, Method, Met Station, WMU 5-25
Figure 7. Screen 2, Wastes Managed 5-25
Tables:
Table 1. Industries for Which NSPSs Have Been Established 5-5
Table 2. HAPs Defined in Section 112 of the CAA Amendments of 1990 5-6
Table 3. Source Categories With MACT Standards 5-8
Table 4. Major Source Determination in Nonattainment Areas 5-15
Table 5. Constituents Included in IWAIR 5-22
Table 6. Source Characterization Models 5-29
Table 7. Example List of Chemical Suppressants 5-34
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Protecting Air Quality
This chapter will help you address:
• Airborne particulates and air emissions that can cause human health
risks and damage the environment by adopting controls to minimize
particulate emissions.
• Assessing risks associated with air emissions and implementing pol-
lution prevention, treatment, or controls as needed to reduce risks
for a facility's waste management units not addressed by require-
ments under the Clean Air Act.
• Using a Clean Air Act Title V permit, at facilities that must obtain
one, as a vehicle for addressing air emissions from certain waste
management units.
Health effects from airborne pol-
lutants can be minor and
reversible (such as eye irrita-
tion) , debilitating (such as
asthma), or chronic and poten-
tially fatal (such as cancer). Potential health
impacts depend on many factors, including
the quantity of air pollution to which people
are exposed, the duration of exposures, and
the toxicity associated with specific pollu-
tants. An air risk assessment takes these fac-
tors into account to predict the risk or
hazards posed at a particular site or facility.
This chapter will help you address the fol-
lowing questions.
• Is a particular facility subject to CAA
requirements?
• What is an air risk assessment?
• Do waste management units pose risks
from volatile air emissions?
• What controls will reduce particulate
and volatile emissions from a facility?
Air releases from waste management units
include particulates or wind-blown dust and
gaseous emissions from volatile compounds
It is recommended that every facility
implement controls to address emissions of
airborne particulates. Particulates have imme-
diate and highly visible impacts on surround-
ing neighborhoods. They can affect human
health and can carry constituents off site as
well. Generally, controls are achieved through
good operating practices.
For air releases from industrial waste man-
agement units, you need to know what regula-
tory requirements under the Clean Air Act
(CAA) apply to your facility, and whether those
requirements address waste management units.
The followup question for facilities whose
waste management units are not addressed by
CAA requirements, is "are there risks from air
releases that should be controlled?"
This Guide provides two tools to help you
answer these questions. First, this chapter
includes an overview of the major emission
control requirements under the CAA and a
decision guide to evaluate which of these
5-1
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
might apply to a facility. The steps of the deci-
sion guide are summarized in Figure 1. Each
facility subject to any of these requirements
will most likely be required to obtain a CAA
Title V operating permit. The decision guide
will help you clarify some of the key facility
information you need to identify applicable
CAA requirements.
If your answers in the decision guide indi-
cate that the facility is or might be subject to
specific regulatory obligations, the next step is
to consult with EPA, state, or local air quality
program staff. Some CAA regulations are
industry-specific and operation-specific within
an industry, while others are pollutant specific
or specific to a geographic area. EPA, state, or
local air quality managers can help you pre-
cisely determine applicable requirements and
whether waste management units are
addressed by those requirements.
You might find that waste management
units are not addressed or that a specific facili-
ty clearly does not fit into any regulatory cate-
gory under the CAA. It is then prudent to
look beyond immediate permit requirements
to assess risks associated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) released from the unit. A
two-tiered approach to this assessment is rec-
ommended, depending on the complexity and
amount of site specific data you have.
Limited Site-Specific Air Assessment:
The CD-ROM version of the Guide contains
the Industrial Waste Air Model (IWAIR). If a
waste contains any of the 95 constituents
included in the model, you can use this risk
model to assess whether VOC emissions pose
a risk that warrants additional emission con-
trols or that could be addressed more effec-
tively with pollution prevention or waste
treatment before placement in the waste man-
agement unit. The IWAIR model allows users
to supply inputs for an emission estimate and
for a dispersion factor for the unit.
Comprehensive Risk Assessment: This
assessment relies on a comprehensive analysis
of waste and site-specific data and use of mod-
els designed to assess multi-pathway exposures
to airborne contaminants. There are a number
of modeling tools available for this analysis.
You should consult closely with your air quali-
ty management agency as you proceed.
Airborne emissions are responsible for the loss of visibility between the left and right pho-
tographs of the Grand Canyon. Source: National Park Service, Air Resources Division.
5-2
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
I. Federal Airborne
Emission Control
Programs
Four major federal programs address air-
borne emissions that can degrade air quality.
For more information about the CAA and
EPA's implementation of it, visit the
Technology Transfer Network, EPA's premier
technical Web site for information transfer
and sharing related to air pollution topics, at
.
If the facility is a major source or other-
wise subject to Title V of the CAA, the owner
must obtain a Title V operating permit. These
permits are typically issued by the state air
permitting authority. As part of the permitting
process, you will be required to develop an
emissions inventory for the facility. Some
states have additional permitting require-
ments. Whether or not emissions from a
waste management unit will be specifically
addressed through the permit process
depends on a number of factors, including
the type of facility and state permitting
resources and priorities. It is prudent, howev-
er, where there are no applicable air permit
requirements to assess whether there might
be risks associated with waste management
units and to address these risks.
A. National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
The CAA authorizes EPA to establish emis-
sion limits to achieve National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS).1 EPA has desig-
nated NAAQS for the following criteria pollu-
tants: ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide,
lead, particulate matter (PM), and carbon
monoxide. The NAAQS establish individual
pollutant concentration ceilings that should
be rarely exceeded in a predetermined geo-
graphical area (National Ambient Air Quality
District). NAAQS are not enforced directly by
EPA. Instead, each state must submit a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) describing how it
will achieve or maintain NAAQS. Many SIPs
call for airborne emission limits on industrial
facilities.
If a waste emits VOCs, some of which are
precursors to ozone, the waste management
unit could be affected by EPA's NAAQS for
ground-level ozone. Currently, states are
implementing an ozone standard of 0.12
parts per million (ppm) as measured over a
1-hour period. In 1997, EPA promulgated a
revised standard of 0.08 ppm with an 8-hour
averaging time to protect public health and
the environment over longer exposure peri-
ods2 (see 62 FR 38856, July 18, 1997). EPA is
currently developing regulations and guid-
ance for implementing the 8-hour ozone
standard. EPA expects to designate areas as
attaining or not attaining the standard in
2004. At that time, areas not attaining the
standard will need to develop plans to control
emissions and to demonstrate how they will
reach attainment. Consult with your state to
determine whether efforts to comply with the
ozone NAAQS involve VOC emission limits
that apply to a specific facility. General ques-
tions about the 8-hour standard should be
directed to EPA's Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Strategies and Standards Division, Ozone
Policy and Strategies Group, MD-15,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone
919 541-5244.
B. New Source
Performance Standards
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPSs) are issued for categories of sources
that cause or contribute significant air pollu-
1 42 U.S.C. § 7409
2 For a discussion of the history of the litigation over the revised ozone standard and EPA's plan for
implementing it, including possible revisions to 40 CFR 50.9(b), see 67 FR 48896 (July 26, 2002).
5-3
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
tion that can reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare. For indus-
try categories, NSPSs establish national tech-
nology-based emission limits for air pollutants,
such as particulate matter (PM) or VOCs.
States have primary responsibility for assuring
that the NSPSs are followed. These standards
are distinct from NAAQS because they estab-
lish direct national emission limits for speci-
fied sources, while NAAQS establish air
quality targets that states meet using a variety
of measures that include emission limits. Table
1 lists industries for which NSPSs have been
established and locations of the NSPSs in the
Code of Federal Regulations. You should
check to see if any of the 74 New Source
Performance Standards (NSPSs)3 apply to the
facility4 Any facility subject to a NSPS must
obtain a Title V permit (see Section D below).
C. National Emission
Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants
Section 112 of the CAA Amendments of
19905 requires EPA to establish national stan-
dards to reduce emissions from a set of certain
pollutants called hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs). Section 112(b) contains a list of 188
HAPs (see Table 2) to be regulated by National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAPs) referred to as Maximum
Achievable Control Technology (MACT) stan-
dards, that are generally set on an industry-by-
industry basis.
MACT standards typically apply to major
sources in specified industries; however, in
some instances, non-major sources also can be
subject to MACT standards. A major source is
defined as any stationary source or group of
stationary sources that (1) is located within a
contiguous area and under common control,
and (2) emits or has the potential to emit at
least 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single HAP
or at least 25 tpy of any combination of HAPs.
All fugitive emissions of HAPs, including emis-
sions from waste management units, are to be
taken into account in determining whether a
stationary source is a major source. Each
MACT standard might limit specific opera-
tions, processes, or wastes that are covered.
Some MACT standards specifically cover waste
management units, while others do not. If a
facility is covered by a MACT standard, it
must be permitted under Title V (see below).
EPA has identified approximately 170 indus-
trial categories and subcategories that are or will
be subject to MACT standards. Table 3 lists the
categories for which standards have been final-
ized, proposed, or are expected. The CAA calls
for EPA to promulgate the standards in four
phases. EPA is currently in the fourth and final
phase of developing proposed regulations.
CAA also requires EPA to assess the risk to
public health remaining after the implementa-
tion of NESHAPs and MACT standards. EPA
must determine if more stringent standards are
necessary to protect public health with an
ample margin of safety or to prevent an
adverse environmental effect. As a first step in
this process the CAA requires EPA to submit a
Report to Congress on its methods for making
the health risks from residual emissions deter-
mination. The final report, Residual Risk
Report to Congress (U.S. EPA, 1997b), was
signed on March 3, 1999 and is available from
EPA's Web site at . If significant resid-
ual risk exists after application of a MACT,
EPA must promulgate health-based standards
for that source category to further reduce HAP
emissions. EPA must set residual risk stan-
dards within 8 years after promulgation of
each NESHAP
5-4
3 40CFRPart60.
4 While NSPSs apply to new facilities, EPA also established emission guidelines for existing facilities.
5 42 U.S.C. § 7412.
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 1. Industries for Which NSPSs Have Been Established
For electronic versions of the 40 CFR Part 60 subparts referenced below, visit
. Be sure to check the Federal Register for updates that have
been published since publication of this Guide.
Facility
40 CFR Part
60 subpart
40 CFR Part
60 subpart
Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture PP
Asphalt Processing 6s Asphalt Roofing Manufacture UU
Auto/Id Truck Surface Coating Operations MM
Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces after 6/11/73 N
Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry WW
Bulk Gasoline Terminals XX
Calciners and Dryers in Mineral Industry UUU
Coal Preparation Plants Y
Commercial 6s Industrial SW Incinerator Units CCCC
Electric Utility Steam Generating Units after 9/18/78 DA
Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries GGG
Equipment Leaks of VOC in SOCMI W
Ferroalloy Production Facilities Z
Flexible Vinyl 6s Urethane Coating 6s Printing FFF
Fossil-fuel Fired Steam Generators after 8/17/71 D
Glass Manufacturing Plants CC
Grain Elevators DD
Graphic Arts: Publication Rotogravure Printing QQ
Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities I
Incinerators E
Industrial Surface Coating, Plastic Parts TTT
Industrial Surface Coating-Large Appliances SS
Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generation Unit DB
Kraft Pulp Mills BB
Large Municipal Waste Combustors after 9/20/94 EB
Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants KK
Lime Manufacturing HH
Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities SSS
Medical Waste Incinerators (MWI) after 6/20/96 EC
Metal Coil Surface Coating TT
Metallic Mineral Processing Plants LL
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills after 5/30/91 WWW
Municipal Waste Combustors (MWC) EA
New Residential Wood Heaters AAA
Nitric Acid Plants G
Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants OOO
Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants, VOC Leaks KKK
Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2 Emissions LLL
Petroleum Dry Cleaners, Rated Capacity 84 Lb JJJ
Petroleum Refineries J
Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems QQQ
Phosphate Fertilizer-Wet Process Phosphoric Acid T
Phosphate Fertilizer-Superphosphoric Acid U
Phosphate Fertilizer-Diammonium Phosphate V
Phosphate Fertilizer-Triple Superphosphate W
Phosphate Fertilizers: GTSP Storage Facilities X
Phosphate Rock Plants NN
Polymer Manufacturing Industry DDD
Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates Fac. VW
Portland Cement Plants F
Pressure Sensitive Tape 6s Label Surface Coating RR
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants S
Primary Copper Smelters P
Primary Lead Smelters R
Primary Zinc Smelters Q
Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry BBB
Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants M
Secondary Lead Smelters L
Sewage Treatment Plants O
Small Indust./Comm./Institut. Steam Generating Units DC
Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units AAAA
SOCMI - Air Oxidation Processes III
SOCMI - Distillation Operations NNN
SOCMI Reactors RRR
SOCMI Wastewater YYY
Stationary Gas Turbines GG
Steel Plants: Elec. Arc Furnaces after 08/17/83 AAA
Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces AA
Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (6/73-5/78) K
Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (5/78-6/84) KA
Sulfuric Acid Plants H
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture EE
Synthetic Fiber Production Facilities HHH
Volatile Storage Vessel (Incl. Petroleum) after 7/23/84 KB
Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants PPP
5-5
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 2
HAPs Defined in Section 112 of the CAA Amendments of 1990
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
75-07-0 Acetaldehyde
60-35-5 Acetamide
75-05-8 Acetonitrile
98-86-2 Acetophenone
53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene
107-02-8 Acrolein
79-06-1 Acrylamide
79-10-7 Acrylic acid
107-13-1 Acrylonitrile
107-05-1 Allyl chloride
92-67-1 4-Aminobiphenyl
62-53-3 Aniline
90-04-0 o-Anisidine
1332-21-4 Asbestos
71-43-2 Benzene (including benzene
from gasoline)
92-87-5 Benzidine
98-07-7 Benzotrichloride
100-44-7 Benzyl chloride
92-52-4 Biphenyl
117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
(DEHP)
542-88-1 Bis(chloromethyl)ether
75-25-2 Bromoform
106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene
156-62-7 Calcium cyanamide
133-06-2 Cap tan
63-25-2 Carbaryl
75-15-0 Carbon disulfide
56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride
463-58-1 Carbonyl sulfide
120-80-9 Catechol
133-90-4 Chloramben
57-74-9 Chlordane
7782-50-5 Chlorine
79-11-8 Chloroacetic acid
532-27-4 2-Chloroacetophenone
108-90-7 Chlorobenzene
510-15-6 Chlorobenzilate
67-66-3 Chloroform
107-30-2 Chloromethyl methyl ether
126-99-8 Chloroprene
1319-77-3 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers
and mixture)
95-48-7 o-Cresol
108-39-4 m-Cresol
106-44-5 p-Cresol
98-82-8 Cumene
94-75-7 2,4-D, salts and esters
72-55-9 DDE
334-88-3 Diazomethane
132-64-9 Dibenzofurans
96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
84-74-2 Dibutylphthalate
106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene(p)
91-94-1 3,3-Dichlorobenzidene
111-44-4 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2-
chloroethyl)ether)
542-75-6 1,3-Dichloropropene
62-73-7 Dichlorvos
111-42-2 Diethanolamine
121-69-7 N,N-Diethyl aniline (N,N-
Dimethylaniline)
64-67-5 Diethyl sulfate
119-90-4 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine
60-11-7 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
119-93-7 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
79-44-7 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
68-12-2 Dimethyl formamide
57-14-7 1,1 -Dimethyl hydrazine
131-11-3 Dimethyl phthalate
77-78-1 Dimethyl sulfate
534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts
51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol
121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-
Diethyleneoxide)
122-66-7 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
106-89-8 Epichlorohydrin (1-Chloro- 2,3-
epoxypropane)
106-88-7 1,2-Epoxybutane
140-88-5 Ethyl acrylate
100-41-4 Ethyl benzene
51-79-6 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)
75-00-3 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane)
106-93-4 Ethylene dibromide
(Dibromoe thane)
107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-
Dichloroethane)
107-21-1 Ethylene glycol
151-56-4 Ethylene imine (Aziridine)
75-21-8 Ethylene oxide
96-45-7 Ethylene thiourea
75-34-3 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-
Dichloroethane)
50-00-0 Formaldehyde
76-44-8 Heptachlor
118- 74-1 Hexachlorobenzene
87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene
77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopenta-diene
67-72-1 Hexachloroethane
822-06-0 Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate
680-31 -9 Hexamethylphosphor-amide
110-54-3 Hexane
302-01-2 Hy drazine
7647-01-0 Hydrochloric acid
7664-39-3 Hydrogen fluoride
(Hydrofluoric acid)
123-31-9 Hydroquinone
78-59-1 Isophorone
58-89-9 Lindane (all isomers)
108-31-6 Maleic anhydride
67-56-1 Methanol
Methoxychlor
72-43-5
74-83-9
74-87-3
71-55-6
78-93-3
60-34-4
74-88-4
108-10-1 Methyl isobutyl ketone
(Hexone)
624-83-9 Methyl isocyanate
80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate
1634-04-4 Methyl tert butyl ether
101-14-4 4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroani-
line)
Methyl bromide
(Bromomethane)
Methyl chloride
(Chloromethane)
Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-
Trichloroe thane)
Methyl ethyl ketone (2-
Butanone)
Methyl hydrazine
Methyl iodide (lodomethane)
75-09-2
Methylene chloride
(Dichloromethane)
101779
91-20-3
98-95-3
92-93-3
101-68-8 Methylene diphenyl diiso-
cyanate (MDI)
4,4'-Methylenedianiline
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrobiphenyl
100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol
79-46-9 2-Nitropropane
684-93-5 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea
62-75-9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
Parathion
Pentachloronitrobenzene
(Quintobenzene)
Pentachlorophenol
108-95-2 Phenol
106-50-3 p-Phenylenediamine
75-44-5 Phosgene
7803-51-2 Phosphine
59-89-2
56-38-2
82-68-8
5-6
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 2
HAPs Defined in Section 112 of the CAA Amendments of 1990 (cont)
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
CAS# CHEMICAL NAME
7723-14-0 Phosphorus
85-44-9 Phthalic anhydride
1336-36-3 Polychlorinated biphenyls
(Aroclors)
1120-71-4 1,3-Propane sultone
57-57-8 beta-Propiolactone
123-38-6 Propionaldehyde
114-26-1 Propoxur (Baygon)
78-87-5 Propylene dichloride (1,2-
Dichloropropane)
75-56-9 Propylene oxide
75-55-8 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl
aziridine)
91-22-5 Quinoline
106-51-4 Quinone (p-Benzoquinone)
100-42-5 Styrene
96-09-3 Styrene oxide
1746-01 -6 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodi-benzo-p-
dioxin
79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene
(Perchloroethylene)
7550-45-0 Titanium tetrachloride
108-88-3 Toluene
95-80-7 2,4-Toluene diamine
584-84-9 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate
95-53-4 o-Toluidine
8001-35-2 Toxaphene (chlorinated cam-
phene)
120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene
95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
121-44-8 Triethylamine
1582 -09-8 Trifluralin
540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
108-05-4 Vinyl acetate
593-60-2 Vinyl bromide
75-01-4 Vinyl chloride
75-35-4 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-
Dichloroethylene)
1330-20-7 Xylenes (mixed isomers)
95-47-6 o-Xylenes
108-38-3 m-Xylenes
106-42-3 p-Xylenes
[none Antimony Compounds
[none Arsenic Compounds (inorganic
including arsine)
[none Beryllium Compounds
[none Cadmium Compounds
[none Chromium Compounds
[none Cobalt Compounds
[none Coke Oven Emissions
[none Cyanide Compounds"
[none Glycol ethers'
[none Lead Compounds
[none Manganese Compounds
[none Mercury Compounds
[none Fine mineral fibers'
[none Nickel Compounds
[none Polycylic Organic Matterd
[none Radionuclides (including
radon)"
[none] Selenium Compounds
NOTE: For all listings above which contain the word "compounds" and for glycol ethers, the following applies: Unless otherwise specified,
these listings are defined as including any unique chemical substance that contains the named chemical (i.e., antimony, arsenic, etc.) as part
of that chemical's infrastructure.
a X'CN where X = FT or any other group where a formal dissociation can occur. For example KCN or Ca(CN)2.
b On January 12, 1999 (64 FR 1780), EPA proposed to modify the definition of glycol ethers to exclude surfactant alcohol ethoxylates and
their derivatives (SAED). On August 2, 2000 (65 FR 47342), EPA published the final action. This action deletes each individual com-
pound in a group called the surfactant alcohol ethoxylates and their derivatives (SAED) from the glycol ethers category in the list of haz-
ardous air pollutants (HAP) established by section 112(b)(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA also made conforming changes in the
definition of glycol ethers with respect to the designation of hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
"The following definition of the glycol ethers category of hazardous air pollutants applies instead of the definition set forth in 42 U.S.C.
7412(b)(l), footnote 2: Glycol ethers include mono- and di-ethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol R-
(OCH2CH2)n-OR'
Where:
n= 1,2, or 3
R= alkyl C7 or less, or phenyl or alkyl substituted phenyl
R'= H, or alkyl C7 or less, or carboxylic acid ester, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, or sulfonate.
c Includes mineral fiber emissions from facilities manufacturing or processing glass, rock, or slag fibers (or other mineral derived fibers) of
average diameter 1 micrometer or less. (Currently under review.)
d Includes organic compounds with more than one benzene ring, and which have a boiling point greater than or equal to 100°C.
(Currently under review.)
e A type of atom which spontaneously undergoes radioactive decay.
5-7
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Source Category
Table 3
Source Categories With MACT Standards
Federal Register Citation Source Category
Federal Register Citation
Fuel Combustion
Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam
Generating Units
Combustion Turbines *
Engine Test Facilities *
Industrial Boilers *
Institutional/Commercial Boilers *
Process Heaters *
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines*
Rocket Testing Facilities *
65 FR 79825(N) 12/20/00
Non-Ferrous Metals Processing
Primary Aluminum Production
Primary Copper Smelting
Primary Lead Smelting
Primary Magnesium Refining
Secondary Aluminum Production
Secondary Lead Smelting
Ferrous Metals Processing
Coke Ovens: Charging, Top Side, and
Door Leaks
Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching and
Battery Stacks
Ferroalloys Production
Silicomanganese and Ferromanganese
Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing
Iron Foundries
Steel Foundries
Steel Pickling-HCl Process Facilities and
Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants
Mineral Products Processing
Asphalt Processing
Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing
Asphalt/Coal Tar Application-Metal Pipes
Clay Products Manufacturing
Lime Manufacturing
Mineral Wool Production.
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Refractories Manufacturing
Taconite Iron Ore Processing
Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
62 FR 52383(F) 10/7/97
63 FR 19582(P) 4/20/98
64 FR 30194(F) 6/4/99
*
65 FR 15689(F) 3/23/00
60 FR 32587(F) 6/23/95
58 FR 57898(F) 10/27/93
66FR35327(P) 7/3/01
64 FR 27450(F) 5/20/00
66 FR 36835(P) 7/13/01
64 FR 33202(F) 6/22/99
64 FR 29490(F) 6/1/99
64 FR 31897(F) 6/14/99
64 FR 31695(F) 6/14/99
Petroleum and Natural Gas Production and Refining
Oil and Natural Gas Production
Natural Gas Transmission and Storage
Petroleum Refineries-Catalytic Cracking
Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and
Sulfur Recovery Units
Petroleum Refineries-Other Sources Not
Distinctly Listed
Liquids Distribution
Gasoline Distribution (Stage 1)
64FR32610(F) 6/17/99
64FR32610(F) 6/17/99
63FR48890(P)9/ll/98
60 FR 43244(F) 8/18/95
59 FR 64303(F) 12/14/94
Marine Vessel Loading Operations
Organic Liquids Distribution
(Non-Gasoline)
Surface Coating Processes
Aerospace Industries
Auto and Light Duty Truck
Flat Wood Paneling
Large Appliance
Magnetic Tapes
Manufacture of Paints, Coatings, and
Adhesives
Metal Can
Metal Coil
Metal Furniture
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
Paper and Other Webs
Plastic Parts and Products
Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics
Printing/Publishing
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair
Wood Building Products
Wood Furniture
Waste Treatment and Disposal
Hazardous Waste Incineration
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Site Remediation
Agricultural Chemicals Production
Pesticide Active Ingredient Production
Fibers Production Processes
Acrylic Fibers/Modacrylic Fibers
Spandex Production
Food and Agriculture Processes
Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil
Production
Vegetable Oil Production
Pharmaceutical Production Processes
Pharmaceuticals Production
Polymers and Resins Production
Acetal Resins Production
Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Production
Alkyd Resins Production
Amino Resins Production
Boat Manufacturing
Butyl Rubber Production
Cellulose Ethers Production
Epichlorohydrin Elastomers Production
60 FR48399(F) 9/19/95
60FR45956(F)9/1/15
*
64FR63025(N) 11/18/99
65FR81134(P) 12/22/00
59 FR 64580(F) 12/15/94
65 FR44616(P) 7/18/00
65 FR55332(P) 9/13/00
61 FR27132(F) 5/30/96
60 FR 64330(F) 12/16/96
*
60 FR 62930(F) 12/7/95
64 FR 52828(F) 9/30/99
65FR66672(P) 11/7/00
61 FR 34140(F) 7/1/96
64 FR 57572(F) 10/26/99
64 FR 33549(F) 6/23/99
64 FR 34853(F) 6/30/99
65 FR 76408(P) 12/6/00
66FR27876(F)5/21/01
66 FR 19006(F) 4/12/01
66 FR 8220(N) 1/30/01
66FR40121(F) 6/1/99
64 FR 34853(F) 6/30/99
61 FR 48208(F) 9/12/96
*
65 FR 3275(F) 1/20/00
66 FR44218(F) 8/22/01
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
65 FR52166(P) 8/28/00
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 3
Source Categories With MACT Standards (cont.)
Source Category
Federal Register Citation Source Category
Federal Register Citation
Epoxy Resins Production
Ethylene-Propylene Rubber Production
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production
Hypalon (tm) Production
Maleic Anhydride Copolymers Production
Methyl Methacrylate-Acrylonitrile
Butadiene-Styrene Production
Methyl Methacrylate-Butadiene-Styrene
Terpolymers Production
Neoprene Production
Nitrile Butadiene Rubber Production
Nitrile Resins Production
Non-Nylon Polyamides Production
Phenolic Resins Production
Polybutadiene Rubber Production
Polycarbonates Production
Polyester Resins Production
Polyether Polyols Production
Polyethylene Terephthalate Production
Polymerized Vinylidene Chloride
Production
Polymethyl Methacrylate Resins Production
Polystyrene Production
Polysulfide Rubber Production
Polyvinyl Acetate Emulsions Production
Polyvinyl Alcohol Production
Polyvinyl Butyral Production
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers
Production
Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
Styrene-Acrylonitrile Production
Styrene-Butadiene Rubber and Latex
Production
Production of Inorganic Chemicals
Ammonium Sulfate Production-
Caprolactam By-Product Plants
Carbon Black Production
Chlorine Production
Cyanide Chemicals Manufacturing
Fumed Silica Production
Hydrochloric Acid Production
Hydrogen Fluoride Production
Phosphate Fertilizers Production
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing
Production of Organic Chemicals
Ethylene Processes
60 FR 12670(F) 3/8/95
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
63 FR 53980(F) 10/7/98
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
61FR46906(F) 9/5/96
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
60 FR 12670(F) 3/8/95
65 FR 3275(F) 1/20/00
61FR46906(F) 9/5/96
64 FR 34853(F) 6/30/99
*
64 FR 29420(F) 6/1/99
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
61FR46906(F) 9/5/96
65 FR 76958(P) 12/8/00
66 FR40324(P) 8/2/01
61 FR48208(F) 9/12/96
61 FR46906(F) 9/5/96
65 FR 76408(P) 12/6/00
*
65 FR 76408(P) 12/6/00
64FR63025(N) 11/18/99
*
64 FR 34853(F) 6/30/99
64FR31358(F) 6/10/99
64FR31358(F) 6/10/99
65 FR 76408(P) 12/6/00
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
Production
Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing
Miscellaneous Processes
Benzyltrimethylammonium Chloride
Production
Carbonyl Sulfide Production
Chelating Agents Production
Chlorinated Paraffins Production
Chromic Acid Anodizing
Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and
Sulfite Pulp and Paper Mills
Commercial Dry Cleaning
(Perchloroethylene)-Transfer Machines
Commercial Sterilization Facilities
Decorative Chromium Electroplating
Ethylidene Norbornene Production
Explosives Production
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication
Operations
Halogenated Solvent Cleaners
Hard Chromium Electroplating
Hydrazine Production
Industrial Cleaning (Perchloroethylene)-
Dry-to-Dry machines
Industrial Dry Cleaning
(Perchloroethylene)-Transfer Machines
Industrial Process Cooling Towers
Leather Finishing Operations
Miscellaneous Viscose Processes
OBPA/1,3-Diisocyanate Production
Paint Stripping Operations
Photographic Chemicals Production
Phthalate Plasticizers Production
Plywood and Composite Wood Products
Pulp and Paper Production
Rubber Chemicals Manufacturing
Rubber Tire Manufacturing
Semiconductor Manufacturing
Symmetrical Tetrachloropyridine
Production
Tetrahydrobenzaldehyde Manufacture
Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
59 FR 19402(F) 4/22/94
60 FR 04948(F) 1/25/95
66FR3180(F) 1/12/01
58 FR 49354(F) 9/22/93
59 FR 62585(F) 12/6/94
60 FR 04948(F) 1/25/95
66FR41718(P)8/8/01
59FR6180KF) 12/2/94
60 FR 04948(F) 1/25/95
58 FR 49354(F) 9/22/93
58 FR 49354(F) 9/22/93
59 FR 46339(F) 9/8/94
67FR9155(F)2/27/02
65 FR52166(F) 8/28/00
65 FR 80755(F) 12/22/00
*
63 FR 62414(P) 10/18/00
63 FR26078(F) 5/21/98
65 FR 34277(P) 5/26/00
This table contains final rules (F), proposed rules (P), and notices (N) promulgated as of February 2002. It does
not identify corrections or clarifications to rules. An * denotes sources required by Section 112 of the CAA to have
MACT standards by 11/15/00 for which proposed rules are being prepared but have not yet been published.
5-9
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
D. Title V Operating
Permits
For many facilities, the new federal oper-
ating permit program established under Title
V of the CAA will cover all sources of air-
borne emissions.6 Generally it requires a per-
mit for any facility emitting or having the
potential to emit more than 100 tpy of any
air pollutants though lower thresholds apply
in non-attainment areas.7 Permits are also
required for all sources subject to MACT or
NSPS standards, the Title IV acid rain pro-
gram, and new source review permits under
Parts C and D of Title V All airborne emis-
sion requirements that apply to an industrial
facility, including emission limitations, oper-
ational requirements, monitoring require-
ments, and reporting requirements, will be
incorporated in its operating permit. A Title
V permit provides a vehicle for ensuring that
existing air quality control requirements are
appropriately applied to facility emission
units.
Under the new program, operating permits
that meet federal requirements will generally
be issued by state agencies. In developing
individual permits, states can determine
whether to explicitly apply emission limita-
tions and controls to waste management
units. See Section F of this chapter (A
Decision Guide to Applicable CAA
Requirements), and consult with federal,
state, and local air program staff to determine
if your waste management unit is subject to
airborne emission limits and controls under
CAA regulations. Listings of EPA regional and
state air pollution control agencies can be
obtained from the States and Territorial Air
Pollution Program Administrators (STAPPA)
& Association of Local Air Pollution Control
Officials (ALAPCO). STAPPA/ALAPCO's Web
site is .
E. Federal Airborne
Emission Regulations for
Solid Waste
Management Activities
While EPA has not established airborne
emission regulations for industrial waste man-
agement units under RCRA, standards devel-
oped for hazardous waste management units
and municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs)
can serve as a guide in evaluating the need for
controls at specific units.
1. Hazardous Waste
Management Unit Airborne
Emission Regulations
Under Section 3004(n) of RCRA, EPA
established standards for the monitoring and
control of airborne emissions from hazardous
waste treatment, storage, and disposal facili-
ties. Subparts AA, BB, and CC of 40 CFR Part
264 address VOC releases from process vents,
equipment leaks, tanks, surface impound-
ments, and containers. Summaries of
Subparts AA, BB, and CC are provided in the
text box on the next page.
2. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
Airborne Emission Regulations
On March 12, 1996, EPA promulgated air-
borne emission regulations for large new and
existing MSWLFs.8 These regulations apply to
all new MSWLFs constructed or modified on
Federal Operating Permit Regulations were promulgated as 40 CFR Part 71 on July 1, 1996 and
amended on February 19, 1999 to cover permits in Indian Country and states without fully approved
Title V programs.
Under CAA Section 302(g), "air pollutant" is defined as any pollutant agent or combination of agents,
including any physical, chemical, biological, or radioactive substance or matter which is emitted into
or otherwise enters the ambient air.
5-10
61 FR 9905; March 12, 1996, codified at 40 CFR Subpart WWW and CC (amended 63 FR 32750,
June 16, 1998).
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
or after May 30, 1991, and to
existing landfills that have
accepted waste on or after
November 8, 1987. In addition
to methane, MSWLFs potentially
emit non-methane organic com-
pounds (NMOCs) in the gases
generated during waste decom-
position, as well as in combus-
tion of the gases in control
devices, and from other sources,
such as dust from vehicle traffic
and emissions from leachate
treatment facilities or mainte-
nance shops. Under the regula-
tions, any affected MSWLF that
emits more than 50 Mg/yr (55
tpy) of NMOCs is required to
install controls.
Best demonstrated technology
requirements for both new and
existing municipal landfills pre-
scribe installation of a well-
designed and well-operated gas
collection system and a control
device. The collection system
should be designed to allow
expansion for new cells that
require controls. The control
device (presumed to be a com-
bustor) must demonstrate either
an NMOC reduction of 98 per-
cent by weight in the collected
gas or an outlet NMOC concen-
tration of no more than 20 parts
per million by volume (ppmv).
3. Offsite Waste and
Recovery
Operations NESHAP
On July 1, 1996, EPA estab-
lished standards for offsite waste
and recovery operations
Summary of Airborne Emission
Regulations for Hazardous Waste
Management Units
Subpart AA regulates organic emissions from
process vents associated with distillation, fractionation,
thin film evaporation, solvent extraction, and air or
stream stripping operations (40 CFR §§264.1030-
1036). Subpart AA only applies to these types of units
managing hazardous waste streams with organic con-
centration levels of at least 10 parts per million by
weight (ppmw). Subpart AA regulations require facili-
ties with covered process vents to either reduce total
organic emissions from all affected process vents at the
facility to below 3 Ib/h and 3.1 tons/yr, or reduce emis-
sions from all process vents by 95 percent through the
use of a control device, such as a closed-vent system,
vapor recovery unit, flare, or other combustion unit.
Subpart BB sets inspection and maintenance
requirements for equipment, such as valves, pumps,
compressors, pressure relief devices, sampling connec-
tion systems, open-ended valves or lines, flanges, or
control devices that contain or contact hazardous
wastes with organic concentrations of at least 10 per-
cent by weight (40 CFR §§264.1050-1065). Subpart
BB does not establish numeric criteria for reducing
emissions, it simply establishes monitoring, leak detec-
tion, and repair requirements.
Subpart CC establishes controls on tanks, surface
impoundments, and containers in which hazardous
waste has been placed ( 40 CFR §§264.1080-1091). It
applies only to units containing hazardous waste with
an average organic concentration greater than 500
ppmw. Units managing hazardous waste that has been
treated to reduce the concentrations of organics by 95
percent are exempt. Non-exempt surface impound-
ments must have either a rigid cover or, if wastes are
not agitated or heated, a floating membrane cover.
Closed vent systems are required to control the emis-
sions from covered surface impoundments. These con-
trol systems must achieve the same 95 percent emission
reductions described above under Subpart AA.
5-11
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
(OSWRO) that emit HAPs.9 To be covered by
OSWRO, a facility must emit or have the
potential to emit at least 10 tpy of any single
HAP or at least 25 tpy of any combination of
HAPs. It must receive waste, used oil, or used
solvents from off site that contain one or
more HAPs.10 In addition, the facility must
operate one of the following: a hazardous
waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility;
RCRA-exempt hazardous wastewater treat-
ment operation; nonhazardous wastewater
treatment facility other than a publicly owned
treatment facility; or a RCRA-exempt haz-
ardous waste recycling or reprocessing opera-
tion, used solvent recovery operation, or used
oil recovery operation.
OSWRO contains MACT standards to
reduce HAP emissions from tanks, surface
impoundments, containers, oil-water separa-
tors, individual drain systems, other material
conveyance systems, process vents, and
equipment leaks. For example, OSWRO
establishes two levels of air emission controls
for tanks depending on tank design capacity
and the maximum organic HAP vapor pres-
sure of the offsite material in the tank. For
process vents, control devices must achieve a
minimum of 95 percent organic HAP emis-
sion control. To control HAP emissions from
equipment leaks, the facility must implement
leak detection and repair work practices and
equipment modifications for those equipment
components containing or contacting offsite
waste having a total organic HAP concentra-
tion greater than 10 percent by weight (see
40 CFR 63.683(d) cross ref. to 40 CFR
63.680 (c) (3)).
F. A Decision Guide to
Applicable CAA
Requirements
The following series of questions, summa-
rized in Figure 1, is designed to help you iden-
tify CAA requirements that might apply to a
facility. This will not give you definitive
answers, but can provide a useful starting point
for consultation with federal, state, or local per-
mitting authorities to determine which require-
ments apply to a specific facility and whether
such requirements address waste management
units at the facility. If a facility is clearly not
subject to CAA requirements, assessing poten-
tial risks from VOC emissions at a waste man-
agement unit using the IWAIR or a site-specific
risk assessment is recommended.
The following steps provide a walk
through of this evaluation process:
1. Determining Emissions From
the Unit
a) Determining VOC's present in the
waste (waste characterization). Then
assume all the VOC's are emitted
from the unit, or
b) Estimating emissions using an emis-
sions model. This also requires waste
characterization. The CHEMDAT8
model is a logical model for these
types of waste units. You can use the
EPA version on the Internet or the
one contained in the IWAIR model-
ing tool for the Guide, or
c) Measuring emissions from the unit.
While this is the most resource inten-
sive alternative, measured data will
provide the most accurate information.
5-12
9 61 FR 34139; July 1, 1996, as amended, 64 FR 38970 (July 20, 1999) and 66 FR 1266 (January 8,
2001).
10 OSWRO identified approximately 100 HAPs to be covered. This HAP list is a subset of the CAA
Section 112 list.
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 1. Evaluating VOC Emission Risk
Characterize waste for potential air emissions
Is the unit part
of an industrial facility
which is subject to a CAA Title V
operating permit by virtue of being:
a. considered a major source; or
b. subject to NSPSs; or
c. considered a major source of HAPs and subject t
NESHAP or MACT standards; or
d. subject to the acid rain program; or
e. a unit subject to the
OSWRO NESHAP?
Facility is subject
Does
the waste
contain any of the 95
listed contaminants
in IWAIR?
Conduct a risk evaluation using either:
b. Site-specific risk
assessment
Industrial Waste Ail
Model (IWAIR)
You should reduce risk to accept
able levels using treatment, con-
trols, or waste minimization
You should operate the unit in accordance with the
recommendations of this guidance.
5-13
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
2. Is the Waste Management
Unit Part of an Industrial
Facility That Is Subject to a
CAA Title V Operating
Permit?
A facility is subject to a Title V operating
permit if it is considered a major source of air
pollutants, or is subject to a NSPS, NESHAP,
or Title IV acid rain provision.11 As part of the
permitting process, the facility should develop
an emissions inventory. Some states have
additional permitting requirements. If a facili-
ty is subject to a Title V operating permit, all
airborne emission requirements that apply to
an industrial facility, including emission limi-
tations as well as operational, monitoring, and
reporting requirements, will be incorporated
in its operating permit. You should consult
with appropriate federal, state, and local air
program staff to determine whether your
waste management unit is subject to air emis-
sion limits and controls.12
If you answer yes to any of the questions
in items a. through e. below, the facility is
subject to a Title V operating permit. Consult
with the appropriate federal, state, and/or
local permitting authority.
Whether or not emissions from waste
management unit(s) will be specifically
addressed through the permit process
depends on a number of factors, including
the type of facility and CAA requirements
and state permitting resources and priorities.
It is prudent, when there are no applicable
air permit requirements, to assess whether
there might be risks associated with waste
management units and to address these
potential risks.
If you answer no to all the questions
below, continue to Step 3.
Stationary source is defined as any
building, structure, facility, or installation
that emits or may emit any regulated air
pollutant or any hazardous air pollutant
listed under Section 112 (b) of the Act.
An air pollutant is defined as any air pol-
lution agent or combination of agents,
including a physical, chemical, biological,
radioactive substance or matter which is
emitted into or otherwise enters the ambi-
ent air.
a. Is the facility considered a major
source ?
If the facility meets any of the following
three definitions, it is considered a major
source (under 40 CFR § 70.2) and subject to
Title V operating permit requirements.
i. Any stationary source or group of
stationary sources that emits or has
the potential to emit at least 100 tpy
of any air pollutant.
ii. Any stationary source or group of
stationary sources that emits or has
the potential to emit at least 10 tpy
of any single HAP or at least 25 tpy
of any combination of HAPs.
iii. A stationary source or group of sta-
tionary sources subject to the nonat-
tainment area provisions of CAA Title
I that emits, or has the potential to
emit, above the threshold values for
its nonattainment area category. The
nonattainment area category and the
source's emission levels for VOCs and
NOX, paniculate matter (PM-10), and
carbon monoxide (CO) determine
whether the stationary source meets
the definition of a "major source."
For nonattainment areas, stationary
sources are considered "major
5-14
11 EPA can designate additional source categories subject to Title V operating permit requirements.
12 Implementation of air emission controls can generate new residual waste. Ensure that these wastes are
managed appropriately, in compliance with state requirements and consistent with the Guide.
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
sources" if they emit or have the
potential to emit at least the levels
found in Table 4 below.
If yes, the facility is subject to a Title V
operating permit. Consult with the appropri-
ate federal, state, and/or local permitting
authority.
If no, continue to determine whether the
facility is subject to a Title V operating permit.
b. Is the facility subject to NSPSs?
Any stationary source subject to a standard
of performance under 40 CFR Part 60 is sub-
ject to NSPS. (A list of NSPSs can be found in
Table 1 above.)
If yes, the facility is subject to a Title V
operating permit. Consult with the appropri-
ate federal, state, and/or local permitting
authority.
If no, continue to determine if the facility
is subject to a Title V operating permit.
c. Is the facility a major source of
HAPs as defined by Section 112 of
CAA and subject to a NESHAP or
MACT standard?
Under Title V of CAA, an operating permit
is required for all facilities subject to a MACT
standard. NESHAPs or MACT standards are
national standards to reduce HAP emissions.
Each MACT standard specifies particular
operations, processes, and/or wastes that are
covered. EPA has identified approximately
170 source categories and subcategories that
are or will be subject to MACT standards.
(Table 3 above lists the source categories for
which EPA is required to promulgate MACT
standards.) MACT standards have been or
will be promulgated for all major source cate-
gories of HAPs and for certain area sources.
If yes, the facility should be permitted
under CAA Title V Consult with the appro-
priate federal, state, and/or local permitting
authority.
If no, continue to determine if the facility
must obtain a Title V operating permit.
of.
Table 4.
Major Source Determination in Nonattainment Areas
Nonattainment
Area Category13
Marginal or
Moderate
Serious
Severe
Extreme
VOCs or NOX
100 tpy
50 tpy
25 tpy
10 tpy
PM-10
100 tpy
70 tpy
—
—
CO
100 tpy
50 tpy
—
—
Is the facility subject to the acid rain
program under Title IV of CAA ?
If a facility, such as a
fossil-fuel fired power
plant, is subject to
emission reduction
requirements or limita-
tions under the acid
rain program, it must
obtain a Title V operat-
ing permit (40 CFR §
72.6). The acid rain
program focuses on the
reduction of annual sul-
fur dioxide and nitro-
gen oxides emissions.
13 The nonattainment categories are based upon the severity of the area's pollution problems. The four cate-
gories for VOCs and NOX range from Moderate to Extreme. Moderate areas are the closest to meeting the
attainment standard, and require the least amount of action. Nonattainment areas with more serious air
quality problems must implement various control measures. The worse the air quality, the more controls
areas will have to implement. PM-10 and CO have only two categories, Moderate and Serious.
5-15
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
A major source under Title III is
defined as any stationary source or
group of stationary sources that emits or
has the potential to emit at least 10 tpy
of any single hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) or at least 25 tpy of any combina-
tion of HAPs.
An area source is any stationary
source which is not a major source but
which might be subject to controls. Area
sources represent a collection of facilities
and emission points for a specific geo-
graphic area. Most area sources are
small, but the collective volume of large
numbers of facilities can be a concern in
densely developed areas, such as urban
neighborhoods and industrial areas.
Examples of areas sources subject to
MACT standards include chromic acid
anodizing, commercial sterilization facil-
ities, decorative chromium electroplat-
ing, hard chromium electroplating,
secondary lead smelting, and halogenat-
ed solvent cleaners.
HAPs are any of the 188 pollutants
listed in Section 112(b) of CAA. (Table 2
above identifies the 188 HAPs.)
If yes, the facility must obtain a Title V
permit. Consult with the appropriate federal,
state, and/or local permitting authority.
When you consult with the appropriate
permitting authority, it is important to clarify
whether waste management units at the facil-
ity are addressed by the requirements. If
waste management units will not be
addressed through the permit process, you
should evaluate VOC emission risks.
If no, continue to determine if the facility
must obtain a Title V operating permit.
e. Is the waste management unit
subject to the OSWRO NESHAP?
This is just an example of the types
of questions you will need to
answer to determine whether a
NESHAP or MACT standard covers
your facility.
To be covered by the OSWRO standards,
your facility must meet all these conditions:
i. Be identified as a major source of
HAP emissions.
ii. Receive waste, used oil, or used sol-
vents (subject to certain exclusions,
40 CFR 63.680 (b) (2)) from off site
that contain one or more HAPs.14
iii. Operate one of the following six
types of waste management or recov-
ery operations (see 40 CFR 63.680
(a) (2)):
• Hazardous waste treatment, storage,
or disposal facility.
• RCRA-exempt hazardous wastewater
treatment operation.
• Nonhazardous wastewater treatment
facility other than a publicly owned
treatment facility.
• RCRA-exempt hazardous waste recy-
cling or reprocessing operation.
• Used solvent recovery operations.
• Used oil recovery operations.
If yes, the unit should be covered by the
OSWRO standards and Title V permitting.
Consult with the appropriate federal, state,
and/or local permitting authority.
If no, it is highly recommended that you
conduct an air risk evaluation as set out in
step 3.
5-16
14 OSWRO identified approximately 100 HAPs to be covered. This HAP list is a subset of the CAA
Section 112 list.
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
3. Conducting a Risk Evaluation
Using One of the Following
Options:
a. Using IWAIR included with the
Guide if your unit contains any of the
95 contaminants that are covered in
the model.
b. Initiating a site-specific risk assess-
ment for individual units. Total all
target constituents from all applicable
units and consider emissions from
other sources at the facility as well.
II. Assessing Risk
Air acts as a medium for the transport of
airborne contamination and, therefore, con-
stitutes an exposure pathway of potential
concern. Models that can predict the fate and
transport of chemical emissions in the atmos-
phere can provide an important tool for eval-
uating and protecting air quality. The
Industrial Waste Air Model (IWAIR) included
in the Guide was developed to assist facility
managers, regulatory agency staff, and the
public in evaluating inhalation risks from
waste management unit emissions. Although
IWAIR is simple to use, it is still essential to
understand the basic concepts of atmospheric
modeling to be able to interpret the results
and understand the nature of any uncertain-
ties. The purpose of this section is to provide
general information on the atmosphere,
chemical transport in the atmosphere, and
the risks associated with inhalation of chemi-
cals so you can understand important factors
to consider when performing a risk assess-
ment for the air pathway.
From a risk perspective, because humans
are continuously exposed to air, the presence
of chemicals in air is important to consider in
any type of assessment. If chemicals build up
to high concentrations in a localized area,
human health can be compromised. The con-
centration of chemicals in a localized area and
the resulting air pollution that can occur in the
atmosphere is dependent upon the quantity
and the rate of the emissions from a source
and the ability of the atmosphere to disperse
the chemicals. Both meteorological and geo-
graphic conditions in a local area will influ-
ence the emission rate and subsequent
dispersion of a chemical. For example, the
meteorologic stability of the atmosphere, a fac-
tor dependent on air temperature, influences
whether the emission stream will rise and mix
with a larger volume of air (resulting in the
dilution of pollutants) or if the emissions
stream will remain close to the ground. Figure
2 is a conceptual diagram of a waste site illus-
trating potential paths of human exposure
through air.
A. Assessing Risks Associated
with Inhalation of
Ambient Air
In any type of risk assessment, there are
basic steps that are necessary for gathering
and evaluating data. An overview of some of
these steps is presented in this section to
assist you in understanding conceptually the
information discussed in the IWAIR section
(Section B). The components of a risk assess-
ment that are discussed in this section are:
identification of chemicals of concern, source
characterization, exposure assessment, and
risk characterization. Each of these steps is
described below as it applies specifically to
risk resulting from the inhalation of organic
chemicals emitted from waste management
units to the ambient air.
Identification of Chemicals of Concern
A preliminary step in any risk assessment
is the identification of chemicals of concern.
These are the chemicals present that are
anticipated to have potential health effects as
5-17
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 2. Conceptual Site Diagram
a result of their concentrations or toxicity
factors. An assessment is performed for a
given source, to evaluate chemical concentra-
tions and toxicity of different chemicals.
Based on these factors along with potential
mechanisms of transport and exposure path-
ways, the decision is made to include or
exclude chemicals in the risk assessment.
Source Characterization
In this step, the critical aspects of the
source (e.g., type of WMU, size, chemical
concentrations, location) are necessary to
obtain. When modeling an area source, such
as those included in the Guide, the amount
of a given chemical that volatilizes and dis-
perses from a source is critically dependent
on the total surface area exposed. The source
characterization should include information
on the surface area and elevation of the unit.
The volatilization is also dependent on other
specific attributes related to the waste man-
agement practices. Waste management prac-
tices of importance include application
frequency in land application units and the
degree of aeration that occurs in a surface
impoundment. Knowledge of the overall con-
tent of the waste being deposited in the
WMU is also needed to estimate chemical
volatilization. Depending on its chemical
characteristics, a chemical can bind with the
other constituents in a waste, decreasing its
emissions to the ambient air. Source charac-
terization involves defining each of these key
parameters for the WMU being modeled. The
accuracy of projections concerning volatiliza-
tion of chemicals from WMUs into ambient
air is improved if more site-specific informa-
tion is used in characterizing the source.
Exposure Assessment
The goal of an exposure assessment is to
estimate the amount of a chemical that is
available and is taken in by an individual,
typically referred to as a receptor. An expo-
sure assessment is performed in two steps: 1)
the first step uses fate and transport model-
ing to determine the chemical concentration
in air at a specified receptor location and, 2)
the second step estimates the amount of the
chemical the receptor will intake by identify-
ing life-style activity patterns. The first step,
the fate and transport modeling, uses a com-
bination of an emission and dispersion model
to estimate the amount of chemical that indi-
viduals residing or working within the vicini-
5-18
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 3. Emissions from a WMU
f'UTTW
ty of the source are exposed to through
inhalation of ambient air. When a chemical
volatilizes from a WMU into the ambient air,
it is subjected to a number of forces that
result in its diffusion and transport away from
the point of release.
In modeling the movement of the volatile
chemical away from the WMU, it is often
assumed that the chemical behaves as a
plume (i.e., the chemical is continuously
emitted into the environment) whose move-
ment is modeled to produce estimated air
concentrations at points of interest. This
process is illustrated in Figure 3.
The pattern of diffusion and movement of
chemicals that volatilize from WMUs depends
on a number of interrelated factors. The ulti-
mate concentration and fate of emissions to
the air are most significantly impacted by
three meteorologic conditions: atmospheric
stability, wind speed, and wind direction.
These meteorologic factors interact to deter-
mine the ultimate concentration of a pollu-
tant in a localized area.
• Atmospheric stability: The stability
of the atmosphere is influenced by
the vertical temperature structure of
the air above the emission source. In
a stable environment, there is little or
no movement of air parcels, and,
consequently, little or no movement
and mixing of contaminants. In such
a stable air environment, chemicals
become "trapped" and unable to
move. Conversely, in an unstable
environment there is significant mix-
ing and therefore greater dispersion
and dilution of the plume.15
Prevailing wind patterns and their
interaction with land features: The
nature of the wind patterns immedi-
ately surrounding the WMU can sig-
nificantly impact the local air
concentrations of airborne chemicals.
Prevailing wind patterns combine
with topographic features such as
hills and buildings to affect the
movement of the plume. Upon
release, the initial direction that emis-
sions will travel is the direction of the
wind. The strength of the wind will
determine how dilute the concentra-
tion of the pollutant will be in that
direction. For example, if a strong
wind is present at the time the pollu-
tants are released, it is likely the pol-
lutants will rapidly leave the source
and become dispersed quickly into a
large volume of air.
An example of an unstable air environment is one in which the sun shining on the earth's surface has
resulted in warmer air at the earth's surface. This warmer air will tend to rise, displacing any cooler air
that is on top of it. As these air parcels essentially switch places, significant mixing occurs.
5-19
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 4. Forces That Affect Contaminant Plumes.
Building
Wftfcl
EHcejs
Wet 0*oo«lion
Dry Deposition
Gratify
Deposit! on/Deptelion
opographi
Features
Photochemical
Os gradation
Thermal
Mijiinn
Cantor
Ł
"H.,-
Air
In addition to these factors affecting the
diffusion and transport of a plume away from
its point of release, the concentration of spe-
cific chemicals in a plume can also be affect-
ed by depletion. As volatile chemicals are
transported away from the WMU, they can
be removed from the ambient air through a
number of depletion mechanisms including
wet deposition (the removal of chemicals due
to precipitation) and dry deposition (the
removal of chemicals due to the forces of
gravity and impacts of the plume on features
such as vegetation). Chemicals can also be
transformed chemically as they come in con-
tact with the sun's rays (i.e., photochemical
degradation). Figure 4 illustrates the forces
acting to transport and deplete the contami-
nant plume.
Because the chemicals being considered in
IWAIR are volatiles and semi-volatiles and the
distances of transport being considered are
relatively short, the removal mechanisms
shown in the figure are likely to have a rela-
tively minor effect on plume concentration
(both wet and dry deposition have significant-
ly greater effects on airborne particulates).
Once the constituent's ambient outdoor
concentration is determined, the receptor's
extent of contact with the pollutant must be
characterized. This step involves determining
the location and activity patterns relevant to
the receptor being considered. In IWAIR, the
receptors are defined as residents and work-
ers located at fixed distances from the WMU,
and the only route of exposure considered
for these receptors is the inhalation of
volatiles. Typical activity patterns and body
physiology of workers and residents are used
to determine the intake of the constituent.
Intake estimates quantify the extent to which
5-20
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
the individual is exposed to the contaminant
and are a function of the breathing rate,
exposure concentration, exposure duration,
exposure frequency, exposure averaging time
(for carcinogens), and body weight.
Estimated exposures are presented in terms of
the mass of the chemical per kilogram of
receptor body weight per day.
Risk Characterization
The concentrations that an individual takes
into his or her body that were determined dur-
ing the exposure assessment phase are com-
bined with toxicity values to generate risk
estimates. Toxicity values used in IWAIR
include inhalation-specific cancer slope factors
(CSFs) for carcinogenic effects and reference
concentrations (RfCs) for noncancer effects.
These are explained in the General Risk
Section in Chapter 1—Understanding Risk
and Building Partnerships. Using these toxicity
values, risk estimates are generated for carcino-
genic effects and noncancer effects. Risk esti-
mates for carcinogens are summed by IWAIR.
B. IWAIR Model
IWAIR is an interactive computer program
with three main components: an emissions
model; a dispersion model to estimate fate
and transport of constituents through the
atmosphere and determine ambient air con-
centrations at specified receptor locations;
and a risk model to calculate either the risk
to exposed individuals or the waste con-
stituent concentrations that can be protective-
ly managed in the unit. To operate, the
program requires only a limited amount of
site-specific information, including facility
location, WMU characteristics, waste charac-
teristics, and receptor information. A brief
description of each component follows. The
IWAIR Technical Background Document (U.S.
EPA, 2002a)contains a more detailed explana-
tion of each.
1. Emissions Model
The emissions model uses waste character-
ization, WMU, and facility information to
estimate emissions for 95 constituents that
are identified in Table 5. The emission model
selected for incorporation into IWAIR is EPAs
CHEMDAT8 model. The entire CHEMDAT8
model is run as the emission component of
the IWAIR model. CHEMDAT8 has under-
gone extensive review by both EPA and
industry representatives and is publicly avail-
able from EPAs Web page, .
To facilitate emission modeling with
CHEMDAT8, IWAIR prompts the user to pro-
vide the required waste- and unit-specific
data. Once these data are entered, the model
calculates and displays chemical-specific
emission rates. If users decide not to develop
or use the CHEMDAT8 rates, they can enter
their own site-specific emission rates (g/m2-s).
2. Dispersion Model
IWAIR's second modeling component esti-
mates dispersion of volatilized contaminants
and determines air concentrations at specified
receptor locations, using default dispersion
factors developed with EPAs Industrial
Source Complex, Short-Term Model, version
3 (ISCST3). ISCST3 was run to calculate dis-
persion for a standardized unit emission rate
(1 ug/m2 - s) to obtain a unitized air concen-
tration (UAC), also called a dispersion factor,
which is measured in u/m3 per ug/m2-s. The
total air concentration estimates are then
developed by multiplying the constituent-
specific emission rates derived from CHEM-
DAT8 (or from another source) with a
site-specific dispersion factor. Running
ISCST3 to develop a new dispersion factor
for each location/WMU is very time consum-
ing and requires extensive meteorological
data and technical expertise. Therefore
IWAIR incorporates default dispersion factors
5-21
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 5. Constituents Included in IWAIR
Chemical Compound Name
Abstracts
(CAS)
Number
Chemical Compound Name
Abstracts
(CAS)
Number
75-07-0 Acetaldehyde
67-64-1 Acetone
75-05-8 Acetonitrile
107-02-8 Acrolein
79-06-1 Acrylamide
79-10-7 Acrylic acid
107-13-1 Acrylonitrile
107-05-1 Allyl chloide
62-53-3 Aniline
71-43-2 Benzene
92-87-5 Benzidine
50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene
75-2 7-4 Bromodichloromethane
106-99-0 Butadine, 1,3-
75-15-0 Carbon disulfide
56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride
108-90-7 Chlorobenzene
124-48-1 Chlorodibromomethane
67-66-3 Chloroform
95-57-8 Chloropphenol, 2-
126-99-8 Chloroprene
1006-10-15 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
1319-77-3 Cresols (total)
98-82-8 Cumene
108-93-0 Cydohexanol
96-12-8 Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane
107-06-2 Dichloroethane, 1,2-
75-35-4 Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
78-87-5 Dichloropropane, 1,2-
57-97-6 Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene , 7,12-
95-65-8 Dimethylphenol, 3,4-
121-14-2 Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
123-91-1 Dioxane, 1,4-
122-66-7 Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2-
106-89-8 Epichlorohydrin
106-88-7 Epoxybutane, 1,2-
11-11-59 Ethoxyethanol acetate, 2-
110-80-5 Ethoxyethanol, 2-
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene
106-93-4 Ethylene dibromide
107-21-1 Ethylene glycol
75-21-8 Ethylene oxide
50-00-0 Formaldehyde
98-01-1 Furfural
87-68-3 Hexachloro-l,3-butadiene
118-74-1 Hexchlorobenzene
77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadine
67-72-1 Hexachloroethane
78-59-1 Isophorone
7439-97-6 Mercury
67-56-1 Methanol
110-49-6 Methoxyethanol acetate, 2-
109-86-4 Methoxyethanol, 2-
74-83-9 Methyl bromide
74-87-3 Methyl chloride
78-93-3 Methyl ethyl ketone
108-10-1 Methyl isobutyl ketone
80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate
1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether
56-49-5 Methylcholanthrene, 3-
75-09-2 Methylene chloride
68-12-2 N-N-Dimethyl formamide
91-20-3 Naphthalene
110-54-3 n-Hexane
98-95-3 Nitrobenzene
79-46-9 Nitropropane, 2-
55-18-5 NiNitrosodiethylamine
924-16-3 N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
930-55-2 N-Nitrosoyrrolidine
95-50-1 o-Dichlorobenzene
95-53-4 o-Toluidine
106-46-7 p-Dichlorobenzene
108-95-2 Phenol
85-44-9 Phthalic anhydride
75-56-9 Propylene oxide
110-86-1 Pyridine
100-42-5 Stryene
1746-01-6 TCDD-2,3,7,8-
630-20-6 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
79-34-5 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene
108-88-3 Toluene
10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
75-25-2 Tribromomethane
76-13-1 Freon 113 (Trichloro-1,2,2- 1,1,2- trifluoroethane)
120-82-1 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
71-55-6 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
79-00-5 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane
121-44-8 Triethylamine
108-05-4 Vinyl acetate
75-01-4 Vinyl chloride
1330-20-7 Xylenes
5-22
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
developed by ISCST3 for many separate sce-
narios designed to cover a broad range of
unit characteristics, including:
• 60 meteorological stations, chosen to
represent the 9 general climate
regions of the continental U.S.
• 4 unit types.
• 17 surface area sizes for landfills,
land application units and surface
impoundments, and 11 surface area
sizes and 7 heights for waste piles.
• 6 receptor distances from the unit
(25, 50, 75, 150, 500, 1000 meters).
• 16 directions in relation to the edge
of the unit.
The default dispersion factors were derived
by modeling many scenarios with various
combinations of parameters, then choosing as
the default the maximum dispersion factor
for each waste management unit/surface
area/meteorological station/receptor distance
combination.
Based on the size and location of a unit, as
specified by a user, IWAIR selects an appro-
priate dispersion factor from the default dis-
persion factors in the model. If the user
specifies a unit surface area that falls between
two of the sizes already modeled, a linear
interpolation method will estimate dispersion
in relation to the two closest unit sizes.
Alternatively, a user can enter a site-specif-
ic dispersion factor developed by conducting
independent modeling with ISCST3 or with a
different model and proceed to the next step,
the risk calculation.
3.
Risk Model
The third component to the model com-
bines the constituent's air concentration with
receptor exposure factors and toxicity bench-
marks to calculate either the risk from con-
centrations managed in the unit or the waste
concentration (Cw) in the unit that should
not be exceeded to protect human health. In
calculating either estimate, the model applies
default values for exposure factors, including
inhalation rate, body weight, exposure dura-
tion, and exposure frequency. These default
values are based on data presented in the
Exposure Factors Handbook (U.S. EPA, 1995a)
and represent average exposure conditions.
IWAIR maintains standard health benchmarks
(CSFs for carcinogens and RfCs for noncar-
cinogens) for 95 constituents. These health
benchmarks are from the Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS) and the Health
Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST).
IWAIR uses these data to perform either a for-
ward calculation to obtain risk estimates or a
backward calculation to obtain protective
waste concentration estimates.
4. Estimation Process
Figure 5 provides an overview of the step-
wise approach the user follows to calculate
risk or protective waste concentration esti-
mates with IWAIR. The seven steps of the
estimation process are shown down the right
side of the figure, and the user specified
inputs are listed to the left of each step. As
the user provides input data, the program
proceeds to the next step. Each step of the
estimation process is discussed below.
a. Select Calculation Method. The user
selects one of two calculation meth-
ods. Use the forward calculation to
arrive at chemical-specific and cumu-
lative risk estimates if the user knows
the concentrations of constituents in
the waste. Use the backward calcula-
tion method to estimate protective
waste concentrations not to be
exceeded in new units. The screen
where this step is performed is shown
in Figure 6.
5-23
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 5. IWAIR Approach for Developing Risk or Protective Waste Concentrations:
This figure shows the steps in the tool to assist the user in developing risk or
protective waste concentration estimates.
User Specifies:
Calculation option
User Specifies:
WMU type
WMU information (e.g.,
operating parameters)
User Specifies:
Constituents (choose up to 6)
Concentration for risk calculation
User Specifies:
Emission rate option
Facility location for meteorological input
User Specifies:
Dispersion factor option
Receptor information (e.g., distance and type)
User Specifies:
Risk level for allowable concentration
calculation
Risk calculation
or
Allowable waste concentration
calculation
Identify WMU
Land application unit
Waste pile
Surface impoundment, aerated
and quiescent
Landfill
Add/modify properties data, as
desired
CHEMDAT8
or
User-specified emission rates
Determine Dispersion Factors
Interpolated from ISCST3 default
dispersion factors
or
User-specified dispersion factors
Calculate Ambient Air Concentrations
Calculates ambient air concentrations for
each receptor based on emission and
dispersion data
T
Calculate Results
Risk Calculation
1. Chemical-specific carcinogenic risk
2. Chemical-specific noncarcinogenic risk
3. Total cancer risk
or
Allowable Waste Concentration
(Cv:[.tc) Calculation
Cwaste for wastewaters (mg/L)
Cwaste for solid wastes (mg/kg)
5-24
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Figure 6. Screen 1, Method, Met Station, WMU.
•Jwwtt llfc -WiiieHiflMtiiKat IftMC Ime 1
T
Method, Met. Station, WMJ L
1
1. MM c*tci*dtan ItaHud
t I
•
r
rt>«»:« crnrrti*!-:
canavtrrtor* tM«Kt on
ilin Mi
1 It -r**Cfl»f 3* DO*
trtW (-*Q« Z* CWK" (* S*«
Ł S
f
r MUvtBM
* WMgpte
i *K mwu, i^c
Uil
] • |
Figure 7. Screen 2, Wastes Managed.
WMtec MnnagiKt
B. Select
sorting option
for identifying
5-25
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
b. Identify Waste Management Unit.
Four WMU types can be modeled:
surface impoundments (Sis), land
application units (LAUs), active land-
fills (LFs), and wastepiles (WPs). For
each WMU, you will be asked to
specify some design and operating
parameters such as surface area,
depth for surface impoundments and
landfills, height for wastepiles, and
tilling depth for LAUs. The amount
of unit specific data needed as input
will vary depending on whether the
user elects to develop CHEMDAT8
emission rates. IWAIR provides
default values for several of the oper-
ating parameters that the user can
choose, if appropriate.
c. Define Waste Managed. Specify
constituents and concentrations in
the waste if you choose a forward
calculation to arrive at chemical spe-
cific risk estimates. If you choose a
backward calculation to estimate pro-
tective waste concentrations, then
specify constituents of concern. The
screen where this step is performed
is shown in Figure 7.
d. Determine Emission Rates. You can
elect to develop CHEMDAT8 emis-
sion rates or provide your own site-
specific emission rates for use in
calculations. IWAIR will also ask for
facility location information to link
the facility's location to one of the 60
IWAIR meteorological stations. Data
from the meteorological stations pro-
vide wind speed and temperature
information needed to develop emis-
sion estimates. In some circum-
stances the user might already have
emissions information from monitor-
ing or a previous modeling exercise.
As an alternative to using the CHEM-
DAT8 rates, a user can provide their
own site-specific emission rates
developed with a different model or
based on emission measurements.
e. Determine Dispersion. The user can
provide site-specific unitized disper-
sion factors (ug/m3 per ug/m2-s) or
have the model develop dispersion
factors based on user-specified WMU
information and the IWAIR default
dispersion data. Because a number of
assumptions were made in develop-
ing the IWAIR default dispersion
data you can elect to provide site-
specific dispersion factors which can
be developed by conducting inde-
pendent modeling with ISCST3 or
with a different model. Whether you
use IWAIR or provide dispersion fac-
tors from another source, specify dis-
tance to the receptor from the edge
of the WMU and the receptor type
(i.e., resident or worker). These data
are used to define points of exposure.
f. Calculate Ambient Air
Concentration. For each receptor,
the model combines emission rates
and dispersion data to estimate ambi-
ent air concentrations for all waste
constituents of concern.
g. Calculate Results. The model calcu-
lates results by combining estimated
ambient air concentrations at a speci-
fied exposure point with receptor
exposure factors and toxicity bench-
marks. Presentation of results
depends on whether you chose a for-
ward or backward calculation:
Forward calculation: Results are estimates of
cancer and non-cancer risks from inhalation
exposure to volatilized constituents in the
waste. If risks are too high, options are: 1)
implement unit controls to reduce volatile air
emissions, 2) implement pollution preven-
5-26
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
tion or treatment to reduce volatile organic
compound (VOC) concentrations before the
waste enters the unit, or 3) conduct a full
site-specific risk assessment to more precisely
characterize risks from the unit.
Backward calculation: Results are estimates of
constituent concentrations in waste that can be
protectively managed in the unit so as not to
exceed a defined risk level (e.g., 1 x 1O6 or
hazard quotient of 1) for specified receptors. A
target risk level for your site can be calculated
based on a number of site-specific factors
including, proximity to potential receptors,
waste characteristics, and waste management
practices. This information should be used to
determine preferred characteristics for wastes
entering the unit. There are several options if it
appears that planned waste concentrations
might be too high: 1) implement pollution
prevention or treatment to reduce VOC con-
centrations in the waste, 2) modify waste man-
agement practices to better control VOCs (for
example, use closed tanks rather than surface
impoundments), or 3) conduct a full site-spe-
cific risk assessment to more precisely charac-
terize risks from the unit.
5. Capabilities and Limitations of
the Model
In many cases, IWAIR will provide a rea-
sonable alternative to conducting a full-scale
site-specific risk analysis to determine if a
WMU poses unacceptable risk to human
health. Because the model can accommodate
only a limited amount of site-specific infor-
mation, however, it is important to under-
stand its capabilities and recognize situations
when it might not be appropriate to use.
Capabilities
• The model provides a reasonable rep-
resentation of VOC inhalation risks
associated with waste management
units.
The model is easy-to-use and
requires a minimal amount of data
and expertise.
The model is flexible and provides
features to meet a variety of user
needs.
A user can enter emission and/or dis-
persion factors derived from another
model (perhaps to avoid some of the
limitations below) and still use
IWAIR to conduct a risk evaluation.
The model can run a forward calcula-
tion from the unit or a backward cal-
culation from the receptor point.
A user can modify health bench-
marks (HBNs) and target risk level,
when appropriate and in consultation
with other stakeholders.
Limitations
Release Mechanisms and Exposure
Routes. The model considers expo-
sures from breathing ambient air. It
does not address potential risks
attributable to particulate releases nor
does it address risks associated with
indirect routes of exposure (i.e, non-
inhalation routes of exposure).
Additionally, in the absence of user-
specified emission rates, volatile
emission estimates are developed
with CHEMDAT8 based on unit- and
waste-specific data. The CHEMDAT8
model was developed to address only
volatile emissions from waste man-
agement units. Competing mecha-
nisms that can generate additional
exposures to the constituents in the
waste such as runoff, erosion, and
5-27
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
paniculate emissions are not
accounted for in the model.
Waste Management Practices. The
user specifies a number of unit-spe-
cific parameters that significantly
impact the inhalation pathway (e.g.,
size, type, and location of WMU,
which is important in identifying
meteorological conditions). However,
the model cannot accommodate
information concerning control tech-
nologies such as covers that might
influence the degree of volatilization
(e.g., whether a wastepile is covered
immediately after application of new
waste). In this case, it might be advis-
able to generate site-specific emission
rates and enter those into IWAIR.
Terrain and Meteorological
Conditions. If a facility is located in
an area of intermediate or complex
terrain or with unusual meteorologi-
cal conditions, it might be advisable
to either 1) generate site-specific air
dispersion modeling results for the
site and enter those results into the
program, or 2) use a site-specific risk
modeling approach different from
IWAIR. The model will inform the
user which of the 60 meteorological
stations is used for a facility. If the
local meteorological conditions are
very different from the site chosen by
the model, it would be more accurate
to choose a different model.
The terrain type surrounding a facili-
ty can impact air dispersion model-
ing results and ultimately risk
estimates. In performing air disper-
sion modeling to develop the IWAIR
default dispersion factors, the model
ISCST3 assumes the area around the
WMU is of simple or flat terrain. The
Guideline on Air Quality Models (U.S.
EPA, 1993) can assist users in deter-
mining whether a facility is in an
area of simple, intermediate, or com-
plex terrain.
• Receptor Type and Location.
IWAIR has predetermined adult
worker and resident receptors, six
receptor locations, and predeter-
mined exposure factors. The program
cannot be used to characterize risk
for other possible exposure scenarios.
For example, the model can not eval-
uate receptors that are closer to the
unit than 25 meters or those that are
further from the unit than 1,000
meters. If the population of concern
for your facility is located beyond the
limits used in IWAIR, consider using
a model that is more appropriate for
the risks posed from your facility.
C. Site-specific Risk
Analysis
IWAIR is not the only model that can be
applicable to a site. In some cases, a site-spe-
cific risk assessment might be more advanta-
geous. A site-specific approach can be
tailored to accommodate the individual needs
of a particular WMU. Such an approach
would rely on site-specific data and on the
application of existing fate and transport
models. Table 6 summarizes available emis-
sions and/or dispersion models that can be
applied in a site-specific analysis. Practical
considerations include the source of the
model(s), the ease in obtaining the model(s),
and the nature of the model(s) (i.e., is it pro-
prietary), and the availability of site-specific
data required for use of the model. Finally,
the model selection process should determine
whether or not the model has been verified
against analytical solutions, other models,
and/or field data. Proper models can be
selected based on the physical and chemical
5-28
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Model Name
Table 6
Source Characterization Models
Summary
AP-42
The EPA's Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary
Point and Area Sources (AP-42), is a compilation of emission factors for a wide
variety of air emission sources, including fugitive dust sources (Section 13.2).
Emission factors are included for paved roads, unpaved roads, heavy construc-
tion operations, aggregate handling and storage piles, industrial wind erosion
(this is the 1988 Cowherd model), and abrasive blasting. These are simple emis-
sion factors or equations that relate emissions to inputs (e.g., silt loading or con-
tent, moisture content, mean vehicle weight, area, activity level, and wind
speed). Guidance is provided for most inputs, but the more site-specific the
input data used, the more accurate the results.
The entire AP-42 documentation is available at , hotline at
919 541-5610 for more information.
Cowherd
The Cowherd model, Rapid Assessment of Exposure to Particulate Emissions
from Surface Contamination Sites, allows the user to calculate particulate emis-
sion rates for wind erosion using data on wind speed and various parameters
that describe the surface being eroded. The latest (1988) version of this model is
event-based (i.e., erosion is modeled as occurring in response to specific events
in which the wind speed exceeds levels needed to cause wind erosion). An older
(1985) version of the model is not event-based (i.e., erosion is modeled as a
long-term average, without regard to specific wind speed patterns over time).
The older version is less complicated and requires fewer inputs, but produces
more conservative results (i.e., higher emissions). The documentation on both
models provides guidance on developing all inputs. Both require data on wind
speed (fastest mile for the 1988 version and annual average for the 1985 ver-
sion), anemometer height, roughness height, and threshold friction velocity. The
1985 version also requires input on vegetative cover. The 1988 version requires
data on number of disturbances per year and, if the source is not a flat surface,
pile shape and orientation to the fastest mile.
The 1985 version of the model is presented in Rapid Assessment of Exposures to
Particulate Emissions from Surface Contamination Sites (U.S. EPA, 1985). Office
of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington DC.
The 1988 version of the model is available as part of AP-42, Section 13.2.5 (see
above).
5-29
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Model Name
Table 6
Source Characterization Models
Summary
ISCLT3
The Industrial Source Complex Model-Long Term, ISCLT3, is a steady state
Gaussian plume dispersion model that can be used to model dispersion of con-
tinuous emissions from point or area sources over transport distances of less
than 50km. It can estimate air concentration for vapors and particles, and dry
deposition rates for particles (but not vapors), and can produce these outputs
averaged over seasonal, annual, or longer time frames. ISCLT3 inputs include
readily available meteorological data known as STAR (STability ARray) sum-
maries (these are joint frequency distributions of wind speed class by wind
direction sector and stability class, and are available from the National Climate
Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina), and information on source character-
istics (such as height, area, emission rate), receptor locations, and a variety of
modeling options (such as rural or urban). Limitations of ISCLT3 include inabili-
ty to model wet deposition, deposition of vapors, complex terrain, or shorter
averaging times than seasonal, all of which can be modeled by ISCST3. In addi-
tion, the area source algorithm used in ISCLT3 is less accurate than the one used
in ISCST3. The runtime for area sources, however, is significantly shorter for
ISCLT3 than for ISCST3.
ISCLT3 is available at .
ISCST3
A steady-state Gaussian plume dispersion model that can estimate concentration,
dry deposition rates (particles only), and wet deposition rates. Is applicable for
continuous emissions, industrial source complexes, rural or urban areas, simple
or complex terrain, transport distances of less than 50 km, and averaging times
from hourly to annual.
Available at .
Landfill Air Emissions Estimation
Model (LAEEM)
Used to estimate emission rates for methane, carbon dioxide, nonmethane
volatile organic compounds, and other hazardous air pollutants from municipal
solid waste landfills. The mathematical model is based on a first order decay
equation that can be run using site-specific data supplied by the user for the
parameters needed to estimate emissions or, if data are not available, using
default value sets included in the model.
Developed by the Clean Air Technology Center (CATC). Can be used to estimate
emission rates for methane, carbon dioxide, nonmethane organic compounds,
and individual air pollutants from landfills. Can also be used by landfill owners
and operators to determine if a landfill is subject to the control requirements of
the federal New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for new municipal solid
waste (MSW) landfills (40 CFR 60 Subpart WWW) or the emission guidelines
for existing MSW landfills (40 CFR 60 Subpart CC).
Developed for municipal solid waste landfills; might not be appropriate for all
industrial waste management units.
Available at .
5-30
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Model Name
Table 6
Source Characterization Models
Summary
Wastewater Treatment Compound
Property Processor and Air Emissions
Estimator Program (WATER9)
WATER9 is a Windows based computer program and consists of analytical
expressions for estimating air emissions of individual waste constituents in
wastewater collection, storage, treatment, and disposal facilities; a database list-
ing many of the organic compounds; and procedures for obtaining reports of
constituent fates, including air emissions and treatment effectiveness.
WATER9 is a significant upgrade of features previously obtained in the computer
programs WATERS, ChemQ, and ChemdatS. WATER9 contains a set of model
units that can be used together in a project to provide a model for an entire facil-
ity. WATER9 is able to evaluate a full facility that contains multiple wastewater
inlet streams, multiple collection systems, and complex treatment configurations.
It also provides separate emission estimates for each individual compound that is
identified as a constituent of the wastes.
WATER9 has the ability to use site-specific compound property information, and
the ability to estimate missing compound property values. Estimates of the total air
emissions from the wastes are obtained by summing the estimates for the individ-
ual compounds. The EPA document Air Emissions Models for Waste and Wastewater
(U.S. EPA, 1994a) includes the equations used in the WATER9 model.
Available at .
Contact the Air Emissions Model Hotline at 919 541-5610 for support or more
information.
Toxic Modeling System Short Term
(TOXST)
An interactive PC-based system to analyze intermittent emissions from toxic
sources. Estimates the dispersion of toxic air pollutants from point, area, and
volume sources at a complex industrial site. This system uses a Monte Carlo sim-
ulation to allow the estimation of ambient concentration impacts for single and
multiple pollutants from continuous and intermittent sources. In addition, the
model estimates the average annual frequency with which user-specified concen-
tration thresholds are expected to be exceeded at receptor sites around the mod-
eled facility. TOXST requires the use of ISCT3 model input files for physical
source parameters.
Available at .
Toxic Screening Model (TSCREEN)
TSCREEN, a Model for Screening Toxic Air Pollutant Concentrations, should be
used in conjunction with the "Workbook of Screening Techniques for Assessing
Impacts of Toxic Air Pollutants." The air toxics dispersion screening models
imbedded in TSCREEN that are used for the various scenarios are SCREEN2,
RVD, PUFF, and the Britter-McQuaid model. Using TSCREEN, a particular
release scenario is selected via input parameters, and TSCREEN model to simu-
late that scenario. The model to be used and the worst case meteorological con-
ditions are automatically selected based on criteria given in the workbook.
TSCREEN has a front-end control program to the models that also provides, by
use of interactive menus and data entry screen, the same steps as the workbook.
5-31
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
A.
attributes of the site in question. As with all
modeling, however, you should consult with
your state prior to investing significant
resources in a site-specific analysis. The state
might have preferred models or might be able
to help plan the analysis.
Emission Control
Techniques
Controlling Particulate
Matter
Particulate matter (PM) consists of air-
borne solid and liquid particles. PM is easily
inhaled and can cause various health prob-
lems. PM also impacts the environment by
decreasing visibility and harming plants as
well as transporting constituents off site.
Constituents can sorb to particulate matter
and, therefore, wind blown dust is a potential
pathway for constituents to leave the site. It is
recommended that facilities adopt controls to
address emissions of airborne particulates.
Solid PM that becomes airborne directly or
indirectly as a result of human activity, is
referred to as fugitive dust16 and it can be
generated from a number of different sources.
The most common sources of fugitive dust at
waste management units include vehicular
traffic on unpaved roads and land-based
units, wind erosion from land-based units,
and waste handling procedures. Developing a
fugitive dust control plan is an efficient way
to tackle these problems. The plan should
include a description of all operations con-
ducted at the unit, a map, a list of all fugitive
dust sources at the unit, and a description of
the control measures that will be used to
minimize fugitive dust emissions. OSHA has
established standards for occupational expo-
sure to dust (see 29 CFR § 1910.1000). You
should check to see if your state also has reg-
ulations or guidance concerning dust or fugi-
tive emission control.
PM emissions at waste management units
vary with the physical and chemical charac-
teristics of waste streams; the volume of waste
handled; the size of the unit, its location, and
associated climate; and waste transportation
and placement practices. The subsections
below discuss the main PM-generating opera-
tions and identify emission control tech-
niques. The waste management units of main
concern for PM emissions include landfills,
waste piles, land application units, and closed
surface impoundments.
1. Vehicular Operations
Waste and cover material are often trans-
ported to units using trucks. If the waste has
the potential for PM to escape to the atmos-
phere during transport, you should cover the
waste with tarps or place wastes in containers
such as double bags or drums.17
A unit can also use vehicles to construct
lifts in landfills, apply liquids to land applica-
tion units, or dredge surface impoundments.
Consider using "dedicated" equipment—vehi-
cles that operate only within the unit and are
not routinely removed from the unit to per-
form other activities. This practice reduces
the likelihood that equipment movement will
spread contaminated PM outside the unit. To
control PM emissions when equipment must
be removed from the landfill unit, such as for
maintenance, a wash station can remove any
contaminated material from the equipment
before it leaves the unit. You should ensure
that this is done in a curbed wash area where
wash water is captured and properly handled.
To minimize PM emissions from all vehi-
cles, it is recommended that you construct
temporary roadways with gravel or other
5-32
16 Fugitive emissions are defined as emissions not caught by a capture system and therefore exclude PM
emitted from exhaust stacks with control devices.
17 Containerizing wastes provides highly effective control of PM emissions, but, due to the large volume of
many industrial waste streams, containerizing waste might not always be feasible.
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
coarse aggregate material to reduce silt con-
tent and thus, dust generation. In addition,
consider regularly cleaning paved roads and
other travel surfaces of dust, mud, and conta-
minated material.
In land application units, the entire appli-
cation surface is often covered with a soil-
waste mix. The most critical preventive
control measure, therefore, involves minimiz-
ing contact between the application surface
and waste delivery vehicles. If possible, allow
only dedicated application vehicles on the
surface, restricting delivery vehicles to a stag-
ing or loading area where they deposit waste
into application vehicles or holding tanks. If
delivery vehicles must enter the application
area, ensure that mud and waste are not
tracked out and deposited on roadways,
where they can dry and then be dispersed by
wind or passing vehicles.
2. Waste Placement and
Handling
PM emissions from waste placement and
handling activities are less likely if exposed
material has a high moisture content.
Therefore, consider wetting the waste prior to
loadout. Increasing the moisture content,
however, might not be suitable for all waste
streams and can result in an unacceptable
increase in leachate production. To reduce
the need for water or suppressants, cover or
confine freshly exposed material. In addition,
consider increasing the moisture content of
the cover material.
It can also be useful to apply water to unit
surfaces after waste placement. Water is gen-
erally applied using a truck with a gravity or
pressure feed. Watering might or might not
be advisable depending on application inten-
sity and frequency, the potential for tracking
of contaminated material off site, and climac-
tic conditions. PM control efficiency generally
increases with application intensity and fre-
quency but also depends on activity levels,
climate, and initial surface conditions.
Infrequent or low-intensity water application
typically will not provide effective control,
while too frequent or high-intensity applica-
tion can increase leachate volume, which can
strain leachate collection systems and threat-
en ground water and surface water. Addition
of excess water to bulk waste material or to
unit surfaces also can reduce the structural
integrity of the landfill lifts, increase tracking
of contaminated mud off site, and increase
odor. These undesirable possibilities can have
long-term implications for the proper man-
agement of a unit. Before instituting a water-
ing program, therefore, ensure that addition
of water does not produce undesirable
impacts on ground- and surface-water quality.
You should consult with your state agency
with respect to these problems.
Chemical dust suppressants are an alterna-
tive to water application. The suppressants are
detergent-like surfactants that increase the
total number of droplets and allow particles to
more easily penetrate the droplets, increasing
the total surface area and contact potential.
Adding a surfactant to a relatively small quan-
tity of water and mixing vigorously produces
small-bubble, high-energy foam in the 100 to
200 um size range. The foam occupies very
little liquid volume, and when applied to the
surface of the bulk material, wets the fines
5-33
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Table 7. Example List of Chemical Suppressants"
Product
Manufacturer
Bitumens
Salts
Adhesives
AMS 2200, 2300®
Coherex®
Docal 1002®
Peneprime®
Petro Tac P®
Resinex®
Retain®
Calcium chloride
Dowflake, Liquid Dow®
DP-10®
Dust Ban 8806®
Dustgard®
Sodium silicate
Acrylic DLR-MS®
Bio Cat 300-1®
CPB-12®
Curasol AK®
DCL-40A, 1801, 1803®
DC-859, 875®
Dust Ban®
Flambinder®
Lignosite®
Norlig A, 12®
Orzan Series®
Soil Card®
Arco Mine Sciences
Witco Chemical
Douglas Oil Company
Utah Emulsions
Syntech Products Corporation
Neyra Industries, Inc.
Dubois Chemical Company
Allied Chemical Corporation
Dow Chemical
Wen-Don Corporation
Nalco Chemical Company
G.S.L. Minerals and Chemical Corporation
The PQ Corporation
Rohm and Haas Company
Applied Natural Systems, Inc.
Wen-Don Corporation
American Hoechst Corporation
Calgon Corporation
Betz Laboratories, Inc.
Nalco Chemical Company
Flambeau Paper Company
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Reed Lignin, Inc.
Crown Zellerbach Corporation
Walsh Chemical
* Mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recom-
mendation for use.
Source: U.S. EPA, 1989.
more effectively than water. When applied to
a unit, suppressants cement loose material
into a more impervious surface or form a sur-
face which attracts and retains moisture.
Examples of chemical dust suppressants are
provided in Table 7. The degree of control
achieved is a function of the application
intensity and frequency and the dilution ratio.
Chemical dust suppressants tend to require
less frequent application than water, reducing
the potential for leachate generation. Their
efficiency varies, depending on the same fac-
tors as water application, as well as spray
nozzle parameters, but generally falls
between 60 and 90 percent reduction in fugi-
tive dust emissions. Suppressant costs, how-
ever, can be high.
At land application units, if wastes contain
considerable moisture, PM can be suppressed
through application of more waste rather
than water or chemical suppressants. This
method, however, is only viable if it would
5-34
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
not cause an exceedence of a design waste
application rate or exceed the capacity of soil
and plants to assimilate waste.
At surface impoundments, the liquid
nature of the waste means PM is not a major
concern while the unit is operational. Inactive
or closed surface impoundments, however,
can emit PM during scraping or bulldozing
operations to remove residual materials. The
uppermost layer of the low permeability soils,
such as compacted clay, which can be used to
line a surface impoundment, contains the
highest contaminant concentrations.
Particulate emissions from this uppermost
layer, therefore, are the chief contributor to
contaminant emissions. When removing
residuals from active units, you should ensure
that equipment scrapes only the residuals,
avoiding the liner below.
3.
Wind Erosion
Wind erosion occurs when a dry surface is
exposed to the atmosphere. The effect is most
pronounced with bare surfaces of small parti-
cles, such as silty soil; heavier or better
anchored material, such as stones or clumps
of vegetation, has limited erosion potential
and requires higher wind speeds before ero-
sion can begin.
Compacted clay and in-situ soil liners tend
to form crusts as their surfaces dry. Crusted
surfaces usually have little or no erosion
potential. Examine the crust thickness and
strength during site inspections. If the crust
does not crumble easily the erosion potential
might be minimal.
Wind fences or barriers are effective means
by which to control fugitive dust emissions
from open dust sources. The wind fence or
barrier reduces wind velocity and turbulence
in an area whose length is many times the
height of the fence. This allows settling of
large particles and reduces emissions from
the exposed surface. It can also shelter mate-
rials handling operations to reduce entrain-
ment during load-in and loadout. Wind
fences or barriers can be portable and either
man-made structures or vegetative barriers,
such as trees. A number of studies have
attempted to determine the effectiveness of
wind fences or barriers for the control of
windblown dust under field conditions.
Several of these studies have shown a
decrease in wind velocity, however, the
degree of emissions reduction varies signifi-
cantly from study to study depending on test
conditions.
Other wind erosion control measures
include passive enclosures such as three-
sided bunkers for the storage of bulk materi-
als, storage silos for various types of aggregate
material, and open-ended buildings. Such
enclosures are most easily used with small,
temporary waste piles. At land application
units that use spray application, further wind
erosion control can be achieved simply by
not spraying waste on windy days.
Windblown PM emissions from a waste
pile depend on how frequently the pile is dis-
turbed, the moisture content of the waste, the
proportion of aggregate fines, and the height
of the pile. When small-particle wastes are
loaded onto a waste pile, the potential for
dust emissions is at a maximum, as small
particles are easily disaggregated and picked
up by wind. This tends to occur when mater-
ial is either added to or removed from the
pile or when the pile is otherwise reshaped.
On the other hand, when the waste remains
undisturbed for long periods and is weath-
ered, its potential for dust emissions can be
greatly reduced. This occurs when moisture
from precipitation and condensation causes
aggregation and cementation of fine particles
to the surface of larger particles, and when
vegetation grows on the pile, shielding the
surface and strengthening it with roots.
5-35
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Finally, limiting the height of the pile can
reduce PM emissions, as wind velocities gen-
erally increase with distance from the
ground.
B. VOC Emission Control
Techniques
If air modeling indicates that VOC emis-
sions are a concern, you should consider pol-
lution prevention and treatment options to
reduce risk. There are several control tech-
niques you can use. Some are applied before
the waste is placed in the unit, reducing
emissions; others contain emissions that
occur after waste placement; still others
process the captured emissions.
1. Choosing a Site to Minimize
Airborne Emission Problems
Careful site choice can reduce VOC emis-
sions. Locations that are sheltered from wind
by trees or other natural features are prefer-
able. Knowing the direction of prevailing
winds and determining whether the unit
would be upwind from existing and expected
future residences, businesses, or other popu-
lation centers can result in better siting of
units. After a unit is sited, observe wind
direction during waste placement, and plan
or move work areas accordingly to reduce
airborne emission impacts on neighbors.
2. Pretreatment of Waste
Pretreating waste can remove organic com-
pounds and possibly eliminate the need for
further air emission controls. Organic
removal or pretreatment is feasible for a vari-
ety of wastes. These processes, which include
steam or air stripping, thin-film evaporation,
solvent extraction, and distillation, can some-
times remove essentially all of the highly
volatile compounds from your waste.
Removal of the volatiles near the point of
generation can obviate the need for controls
on your subsequent process units and can
facilitate recycling the recovered organics
back to the process.
The control efficiency of organic removal
depends on many factors, such as emissions
from the removal system, and the uncon-
trolled emissions from management units
before the removal device was installed.
Generally, overall organic removal efficiencies
of 98 to over 99 percent can be achieved.
3. Enclosure of Units
You might be able to control VOC emis-
sions from your landfill or waste pile by
installing a flexible membrane cover, enclos-
ing the unit in a rigid structure, or using an
air-supported structure. Fans maintain posi-
tive pressure to inflate an air-supported struc-
ture. Some of the air-supported covers that
have been used consist of PVC-coated poly-
ester with a polyvinyl fluoride film backing.
The efficiency of air-supported structures
depends primarily on how well the structure
prevents leaks and how quickly any leaks
that do occur are detected. For effective con-
trol, the air vented from the structure should
be sent to a control device, such as a carbon
adsorber. Worker safety issues related to
access to the interior of any flexible mem-
brane cover or other pollutant concentration
system should also be considered.
Wind fences or barriers can also aid in
reducing organic emissions by reducing air
mixing on the leeward side of the screen. In
addition, wind fences reduce soil moisture
loss due to wind, which can in turn result in
decreased VOC emissions.
Floating membrane covers provide control
on various types of surface impoundments,
including water reservoirs in the western
United States. For successful control of
5-36
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
organic compounds, the membrane must
provide a seal at the edge of the impound-
ment and rainwater must be removed. If gas
is generated under the cover, vents and a
control device might also be needed.
Emission control depends primarily on the
type of membrane, its thickness, and the
nature of the organic compounds in the
waste. Again, we recommend that you con-
sult with your state or local air quality agency
to identify the most appropriate emission
control for your impoundment.
4. Treatment of Captured VOCs
In some cases, waste will still emit some
VOCs despite waste reduction or pretreat-
ment efforts. Enclosing the unit serves to pre-
vent the immediate escape of these VOCs to
the atmosphere. To avoid eventually releasing
VOCs through an enclosure's ventilation sys-
tem, a treatment system is necessary. Some of
the better-known treatment methods are dis-
cussed below; others also are be available.
a. Adsorption
Adsorption is the adherence of particles of
one substance, in this case VOCs, to the sur-
face of another substance, in this case a filtra-
tion or treatment matrix. The matrix can be
replaced or flushed when its surface becomes
saturated with the collected VOCs.
Carbon Adsorption. In carbon adsorp-
tion, organics are selectively collected on the
surface of a porous solid. Activated carbon is
a common adsorbent because of its high
internal surface area: 1 gram of carbon can
have a surface area equal to that of a football
field and can typically adsorb up to half its
weight in organics. For adsorption to be
effective, replace, regenerate, or recharge the
carbon when treatment efficiency begins to
decline. In addition, any emissions from the
disposal or regeneration of the carbon should
be controlled. Control efficiencies of 97 to 99
percent have been demonstrated for carbon
adsorbers in many applications.
Biofiltration. While covering odorous
materials with soil is a longstanding odor
control practice, the commercial use of biofil-
tration is a relatively recent development.
Biofilters reproduce and improve upon the
soil cover concept used in landfills. In a
biofilter, gas emissions containing biodegrad-
able VOCs pass through a bed packed with
damp, porous organic particles. The biologi-
cally active filter bed then adsorbs the VOCs.
Microorganisms attached to the wetted filter
material aerobically degrade the adsorbed
chemical compounds. Biofiltration can be a
highly effective and low-cost alternative to
other, more conventional, air pollution con-
trol technologies such as thermal oxidation,
catalytic incineration, condensation, carbon
adsorption, and absorption. Successful com-
mercial biofilter applications include treat-
ment of gas emissions from composting
operations, rendering plants, food and tobac-
co processing, chemical manufacturing,
foundries, and other industrial facilities.18
b. Condensation
Condensers work by cooling the vented
vapors to their dew point and removing the
organics as liquids. The efficiency of a con-
denser is determined by the vapor phase con-
centration of the specific organics and the
condenser temperature. Two common types
of condensers are contact condensers and
surface condensers.
c. Absorption
In absorption, the organics in the vent gas
dissolve in a liquid. The contact between the
absorbing liquid and the vent gas is accom-
plished in spray towers, scrubbers, or packed
or plate columns. Some common solvents
that might be useful for volatile organics
Mycock, J.C., J.D. McKenna, and L. Theodore. 1995. Handbook of Air Pollution Control Engineering
and Technology
5-37
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
include water, mineral oils, or other non-
volatile petroleum oils. Absorption efficien-
cies of 60 to 96 percent have been reported
for organics. The material removed from the
absorber can present a disposal or separation
problem. For example, organics must be
removed from the water or nonvolatile oil
without losing them as emissions during the
solvent recovery or treatment process.
d. Vapor Combust/on
Vapor combustion is another control tech-
nique for vented vapors. The destruction of
organics can be accomplished in flares; ther-
mal oxidizers, such as incinerators, boilers,
or process heaters; and in catalytic oxidizers.
Flares are an open combustion process in
which oxygen is supplied by the air sur-
rounding the flame. Flares are either operated
at ground level or elevated. Properly operated
flares can achieve destruction efficiencies of
at least 98 percent. Thermal vapor incinera-
tors can also achieve destruction efficiencies
of at least 98 percent with adequately high
temperature, good mixing, sufficient oxygen,
and an adequate residence time. Catalytic
incinerators provide oxidation at tempera-
tures lower than those required by thermal
incinerators. Design considerations are
important because the catalyst can be
adversely affected by high temperatures, high
concentrations of organics, fouling from par-
ticulate matter or polymers, and deactivation
by halogens or certain metals.
5. Special Considerations for
Land Application Units
Since spraying wastes increases contact
between waste and air and promotes VOC
emissions, if the waste contains volatile
organics you might want to choose another
application method, such as subsurface injec-
tion. During subsurface injection, waste is
supplied to the injection unit directly from a
remote holding tank and injected approxi-
mately 6 inches into the soil; hence, the
waste is not exposed to the atmosphere. In
addition, you should consider pretreating the
waste to remove the organics before placing
it in the land application unit.
5-38
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Protecting Air Activity List
We recommend that you consider the following issues when evaluating and controlling air
emissions from industrial waste management units:
Q Understand air pollution laws and regulations, and determine whether and how they
apply to a unit.
Q Evaluate waste management units to identify possible sources of volatile organic
emissions.
Q Work with your state agency to evaluate and implement appropriate emission control
techniques, as necessary.
5-39
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Resources
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 1997. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices.
Christensen, T.H., R. Cossu, and R. Stegmann. 1995. Siting, Lining Drainage & Landfill Mechanics,
Proceeding from Sardinia 95 Fifth International Landfill Symposium, Volume II.
Finn, L., and R. Spencer. 1987. Managing Biofilters for Consistent Odor and VOC Treatment. BioCycle.
January.
Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities and Hazardous Waste Generators; Organic Air
Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments, and Containers; Final Rule. Federal Register. Volume
59, Number 233, December 6, 1994. pp. 62896 - 62953.
Mycock, J.C., J.D. McKenna, and L. Theodore. 1995. Handbook of Air Pollution Control Engineering and
Technology.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. Federal Register. Volume 62, Number 138, July
18, 1997. pp. 38651-38701.
Orlemann, J.A., TJ. Kalman, J.A. Cummings, E.Y. Lin. 1983. Fugitive Dust Control Technology.
Robinson, W 1986. The Solid Waste Handbook: A Practical Guide.
Texas Center for Policy Studies. 1995. Texas Environmental Almanac, Chapter 6, Air Quality,
U.S. EPA. 2002a. Industrial Waste Air Model Technical Background Document. EPA530-R-02-010.
U.S. EPA. 2002b. Industrial Waste Air Model (IWAIR) User's Guide. EPA530-R-02-011.
U.S. EPA. 1998. Taking Toxics out of the Air: Progress in Setting "Maximum Achievable Control Technology"
Standards Under the Clean Air Act. EPA451-K-98-001.
U.S. EPA. 1997a. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Soil Treatment Technologies: Suggested Operational
Guidelines to Prevent Cross-Media Transfer of Contaminants During Clean-Up Activities. EPA530-R-97-007.
U.S. EPA. 1997b. Residual Risk Report to Congress. EPA453-R-97-001.
U.S. EPA. 1996. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods—SW846. Third
Edition.
5-40
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Protecting Air Quality
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Exposure Factors Handbook: Volumes 1-3. EPA600-P-95-002FA-C.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Survey of Control Technologies for Low Concentration Organic Vapor Gas Streams.
EPA456-R-95-003.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models: Volume I.
EPA454-B-95-003a.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models: Volume II-
Description of Model Algorithms. EPA454-B-95-003b.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Air Emissions Models for Waste and Wastewater. EPA453-R-94-080A.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Handbook: Control Techniques for Fugitive VOC Emissions from Chemical Process
Facilities. EPA625-R-93-005.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. Toxic Modeling System Short-Term (TOXST) User's Guide: Volume I. EPA454-R-94-058A.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Guideline on Air Quality Models. EPA450-2-78-027R-C
U.S. EPA. 1992a. Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites. EPA625-R-92-012.
U.S. EPA. 1992b. Protocol for Determining the Best Performing Model. EPA454-R-92-025.
U.S. EPA. 1992c. Seminar Publication: Organic Air Emissions from Waste Management Facilities. EPA625-
R-92-003.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Control Technologies for Hazardous Air Pollutants. EPA625-6-91-014.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Hazardous Waste TSDF—Fugitive Particulate Matter Air Emissions Guidance Document.
EPA450-3-89-019.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors. AP-42.
U.S. EPA. 1985. Rapid Assessment of Exposures to Particulate Emissions form Surface Contamination
Sites.
Viessman, W, and M. Hammer. 1985. Water Supply and Pollution Control.
5-41
-------
-------
Part
Protecting Surface Water
Chapter 6
Protecting Surface Water
-------
-------
Contents
I. Determining the Quality and Health of Surface Waters 6 - 1
A. Water Quality Criteria 6 - 2
B. Water Quality Standards 6 - 2
C. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program 6 - 3
II. Surface-Water Protection Programs Applicable to Waste Management Units 6-4
A. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program 6 - 4
1. Storm-Water Discharges 6 - 5
2. Discharges to Surface Waters 6 - 6
B. National Pretreatment Program 6 - 6
1. Description of the National Pretreatment Program 6 - 6
2. Treatment of Waste at POTW Plants 6 - 8
III. Understanding Fate and Transport of Pollutants 6 - 10
A. How Do Pollutants Move From Waste Management Units To Surface Water? 6 - 10
1. Overland Flow 6 - 10
2. Ground Water to Surface Water 6 - 11
3. Air to Surface Water 6 - 11
B. What Happens When Pollutants Enter Surface Water? 6 - 12
C. Pollutants Of Concern 6-13
IV Protecting Surface Waters 6 - 13
A. Controls to Address Surface-Water Contamination from Overland Flow 6 - 13
1. Baseline BMPs 6- 18
2. Activity-Specific BMPs 6 - 18
3. Site-Specific BMPs 6- 19
B. Controls to Address Surface-water Contamination from Ground Water to Surface Water 6 - 29
C. Controls to Address Surface-water Contamination from Air to Surface Water 6 - 29
V Methods of Calculating Run-on and Runoff Rates 6 - 30
Protecting Surface Water Activity List 6 - 33
Resources 6-34
Figures:
Figure 1. BMP Identification and Selection Flow Chart 6 - 17
Figure 2. Coverings 6 - 22
Figure 3. Silt Fence 6-24
-------
Contents (cont.)
Figure 4. Straw Bale 6-24
Figure 5. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 6 - 25
Figure 6. Collection and Sedimentation Basin 6 - 26
Figure 7. Outlet Protection 6-27
Figure 8. Infiltration Trench 6 - 28
Figure 9. Typical Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves 6 - 31
Tables:
Table 1. Biological and Chemical Processes Occurring in Surface Water Bodies 6 - 14
Table 2. Priority Pollutants 6 - 15
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Protecting Surface Water
This chapter will help you:
• Protect surface waters by limiting the discharge of pollutants into
the waters of the United States.
• Guard against inappropriate discharges of pollutants associated
with process wastewaters and storm water to ensure the safety of
the nation's surface waters.
• Reduce storm-water discharges by complying with applicable regula-
tions, implementing available storm-water controls, and identifying
best management practices (BMPs) to control storm water.
Over 70 percent of the Earth's
surface is water. Of all the
Earth's water, 97 percent is
found in the oceans and seas,
while 3 percent is fresh water.
This fresh water is found in glaciers, lakes,
ground water, wetlands, and rivers. Because
This chapter will help you address the
following questions:
• What surface-water protection pro-
grams are applicable to my waste
management unit?
• What are the objectives of run-on and
runoff control systems?
• What should be considered in design-
ing surface-water protection systems?
• What BMPs should be implemented
to protect surface waters from pollu-
tants associated with waste manage-
ment units?
• What are some of the engineering and
physical mechanisms available to con-
trol storm water?
water is such a valuable commodity, the pro-
tection of our surface waters should be every-
one's goal. Pollutants1 associated with waste
management units and storm-water dis-
charges must be controlled.
This chapter summarizes how EPA and
states determine the quality of surface waters
and subsequently describes the existing sur-
face-water protection programs for ensuring
the health and integrity of waterbodies. The
fate and transport of pollutants in the surface-
water environment is also discussed. Finally,
various methods that are used to control pollu-
tant discharges to surface waters are described.
I. Determining the
Quality and
Health of
Surface Waters
The protection of aquatic resources is gov-
erned by the Clean Water Act (CWA). The
objective of the CWA is to "restore and main-
tain the chemical, physical, and biological
To be consistent with the terminology used in the Clean Water Act, the term pollutant is used in this
chapter in place of the term constituent. In this chapter, pollutant means an effluent or condition intro-
duced to surface waters that results in degradation. Water pollutants include human and animal wastes,
nutrients, soil and sediments, toxics, sewage, garbage, chemical wastes, and heat.
6-1
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
What is water quality?
Water quality reflects the composition of
water as affected by natural causes and
human activities, expressed in terms of
measurable quantities and related to
intended water use. Water quality is deter-
mined by comparing physical, chemical,
biological, microbiological, and radiologi-
cal quantities and parameters to a set of
standards and criteria. Water quality is
perceived differently by different people.
For example, a public health official might
be concerned with the bacterial and viral
safety of water used for drinking and
bathing, while fishermen might be con-
cerned that the quality of water be suffi-
cient to provide the best habitat for fish.
For each intended use and water quality
benefit, different parameters can be used
to express water quality.
integrity of the nation's waters" (Section
101 (a)). Section 304(a) of the CWA authorizes
EPA to publish recommended water quality
criteria that provide guidance for states to use
in adopting water quality standards under
Section 303(c). Section 303 of the CWA also
establishes the Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) Program which requires EPA and the
states to identify waters not meeting water
quality standards and to establish TMDLs for
those waters.
A. Water Quality Criteria
Under authority of Section 304 of the
CWA, EPA publishes water quality "criteria"
that reflect available scientific information on
the maximum acceptable concentration levels
of specific chemicals in water that will protect
aquatic life, human health, and drinking
water. EPA has also established nutrient crite-
ria (e.g., phosphorus and nitrogen) and bio-
logical criteria (i.e., biointegrity values). These
criteria are used by the states for developing
enforceable water quality standards and iden-
tifying problem areas.
Water quality criteria are developed from
toxicity studies conducted on different organ-
isms and from studies of the effects of toxic
compounds on humans. Federal water quality
criteria specify the maximum exposure con-
centrations that will provide protection of
aquatic life and human health. Generally,
however, the water quality criteria describe
the quality of water that will support a partic-
ular use of the water body. For the protection
of aquatic life a two-value criterion has been
established to account for acute and chronic
toxicity of pollutants. The human health crite-
rion specifies the risk incurred with exposure
to the toxic compounds at a specified concen-
tration. The human health criterion is associ-
ated with the increased risk of contracting a
debilitating disease, such as cancer.
B. Water Quality Standards
Water quality standards are laws or regula-
tions that states (and authorized tribes) adopt
to enhance and maintain the quality of water
and protect public health. States have the pri-
mary responsibility for developing and imple-
menting these standards. Water quality
standards consist of three elements: 1) the
"designated beneficial use" or "uses" of a
waterbody or segment of a waterbody 2) the
water quality "criteria" necessary to protect
the uses of that particular waterbody, and 3)
an antidegradation policy. "Designated use" is
a term that is specified in water quality stan-
dards for a body of water or a segment of a
body of water (e.g., a particular branch of a
river). Typical uses include public water sup-
ply, propagation of fish and wildlife, and
recreational, agricultural, industrial, and navi-
gational purposes. Each state develops its own
use classification system based on the generic
6-2
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
U.S. EPA Selected Water Quality Criteria in Micrograms per Liter
Aquatic Life Human Health 1O6 Risk
Freshwater Marine Water and Fish Fish Ingestion
Chemical Acute Chronic Acute Chronic Ingestion Only
Benzene 5300 — 5100 700 0.66
Cadmium — — 43 9.3 10
DDT 1.1 0.001 0.13 0.001 0.000024
PCBs 2 0.014 10 0.03 0.000079
40
—
0.000024
0.000079
uses cited in the CWA. The states may differ-
entiate and subcategorize the types of uses
that are to be protected, such as cold-water or
warm-water fisheries, or specific species that
are to be protected (e.g., trout, salmon, bass).
States may also designate special uses to pro-
tect sensitive or valuable aquatic life or habi-
tat. In addition, the water quality criteria
adopted into a state water quality standard
may or may not be the same number pub-
lished by EPA under section 304. States have
the discretion to adjust the EPAs criteria to
reflect local environmental conditions and
human exposure patterns.
The CWA requires that the states review
their standards at least once every three years
and submit the results to EPA for review. EPA
is required to either approve or disapprove
the standards, depending on whether they
meet the requirements of the CWA. When
EPA disapproves a standard, and the state
does not revise the standard to meet EPAs
objection, the CWA requires the Agency to
propose substitute federal standards.
C. Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) Program
Lasting solutions to water quality problems
and pollution control can be best achieved by
looking at the fate of all pollutants in a water-
shed. The CWA requires EPA to administer
the total maximum daily load (TMDL) pro-
gram, under which the states establish the
allowable pollutant loadings for impaired
waterbodies (i.e., waterbodies not meeting
state water quality standards) based on their
"waste assimilative capacity." EPA must
approve or disapprove TMDLs established by
the states. If EPA disapproves a state TMDL,
EPA must establish a federal TMDL.
A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum
amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can
receive and still meet water quality standards.
The calculation must include a margin of
safety to ensure that the waterbody can be
used for the purposes the state has designat-
ed. The calculation must also account for sea-
sonal variation in water quality.
The quantity of pollutants that can be dis-
charged into a surface-water body without
use impairment (also taking into account nat-
ural inputs such as erosion) is known as the
"assimilative capacity." The assimilative capac-
ity is the range of concentrations of a sub-
stance or a mixture of substances that will
not impair attainment of water quality stan-
dards. Typically, the assimilative capacity of
surface-water bodies might be higher for
biodegradable organic matter, but it can be
very low for some toxic chemicals that accu-
mulative in the tissues of aquatic organisms
and become injurious to animals and people
using them as food.
6-3
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
What is a watershed?
Watersheds are areas of land that drain to
surface-waterbodies. A watershed general-
ly includes lakes, rivers, estuaries, wet-
lands, streams, and the surrounding
landscape. Ground-water recharge areas
are also considered part of a watershed.
Because watersheds are defined by natur-
al hydrology, they represent the most log-
ical basis for managing surface-water
resources. Managing the watershed as a
whole allows state and local authorities to
gain a more complete understanding of
overall conditions in an area and the
cumulative stressors which affect the sur-
face-water body. Information on EPA's
strategy to protect and restore water qual-
ity and aquatic ecosystems at the water-
shed level can be found at
II. Surface-Water
Protection
Programs
Applicable to
Waste
Management
Units
To ensure that a state's water quality stan-
dards and TMDLs are being met, discharges of
pollutants are regulated through the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit Program and the National
Pretreatment Program. These permitting pro-
grams are implemented and enforced at the
state or local level.
A. National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit
Program
The CWA requires most "point sources"
(i.e., entities that discharge pollutants of any
kind into waters of the United States) to have
a permit establishing pollution limits, and
specifying monitoring and reporting require-
ments. This permitting process is known as
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES). Permits are issued for three
types of wastes that are collected in sewers
and treated at municipal wastewater treat-
ment plants or that discharge directly into
receiving waters: process wastewater, non-
process wastewater, and storm water. Most
discharges of municipal and industrial storm
water require NPDES permits, but some
other storm water discharges do not require
permits. To protect public health and aquatic
life and assure that every facility treats waste-
water, NPDES permits include the following
terms and conditions.
• Site-specific effluent (or discharge)
limitations.
• Standard and site-specific compliance
monitoring and reporting require-
ments.
• Monitoring, reporting, and compliance
schedules that must be met.
There are various methods used to monitor
NPDES permit conditions. The permit will
require the facility to sample its discharges and
notify EPA and the state regulatory agency of
these results. In addition, the permit will
require the facility to notify EPA and the state
regulatory agency when the facility determines
it is not in compliance with the requirements
of a permit. EPA and state regulatory agencies
also send inspectors to facilities in order to
6-4
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
determine if they are in compliance with the
conditions imposed under their permits.
NPDES permits typically establish specific
"effluent limitations" relating to the type of
discharge. For process wastewaters, the per-
mit incorporates the more stringent of tech-
nology-based limitations (either at 40 CFR
Parts 405 through 471 or developed on a
case-by-case basis according to the permit
writer's best professional judgement) or water
quality-based effluent limits (WQBELs).
Some waste management units, such as sur-
face impoundments, might have an NPDES
permit to discharge wastewaters directly to
surface waters. Other units might need an
NPDES permit for storm-water discharges.
NPDES permits are issued by EPA or states
with NPDES permitting authority. If you are
located in a state with NPDES authority, you
should contact the state directly to determine
the requirements for your discharges. EPA's
Office of Wastewater Management's Web page
contains a complete, updated list of the states
with approved NPDES permit programs, as
well as a fact sheet and frequently asked
questions about the NPDES permit program
at . If a state does not
have NPDES permitting authority, you should
follow any state requirements for discharges
and contact EPA to determine the applicable
federal requirements for discharges.
1. Storm-Water Discharges
EPA has defined 11 categories of "storm-
water discharges associated with industrial
activity" that require a permit to discharge to
navigable waters (40 CFR Part 122.26 (b)
(14)). These 11 categories are: 1) facilities
subject to storm-water effluent limitations
guidelines, new source performance stan-
dards (NSPS), or toxic pollutant effluent stan-
dards under 40 CFR Part 129 (specifies
manufacturers of 6 specific pesticides), 2)
When is an NPDES permit
needed?
To answer questions about whether or
not a facility needs to seek NPDES per-
mit coverage, or to determine whether a
particular program is administered by
EPA or a state agency, contact your state
or EPA regional storm-water office.
Currently, 44 states and the U.S. Virgin
Islands have federally-approved state
NPDES permit programs. The following
6 states do not have final EPA approval:
Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, and New Mexico.
(As of March 2001)
"heavy" manufacturing facilities, 3) mining
and oil and gas operations with "contaminat-
ed" storm-water discharges, 4) hazardous
waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities,
5) landfills, land application sites, and open
dumps, 6) recycling facilities, 7) steam elec-
tric generating facilities, 8) transportation
facilities, 9) sewage treatment plants, 10)
construction operations disturbing five or
more acres, and 11) other industrial facilities
where materials are exposed to storm water.
Nonhazardous waste landfills, waste piles,
and land application units are included in
category 5. Under a new Section 122.26(b)
(15), storm water discharges from construc-
tion operations disturbing between one and
five acres will be required to obtain a NPDES
permit effective in March 2003. There will
be, however, some waivers from permit
requirements available.
To provide flexibility for the regulated
community in acquiring NPDES storm-water
discharge permits, EPA has two NPDES per-
mit application options: individual permits
and general permits.2 Applications for indi-
Initially, a group application option was available for facilities with similar activities to jointly submit a
single application for permit coverage. A multi-sector general permit was then issued based upon infor-
mation provided in the group applications. The group application option was only used during the ini-
tial stages of the program and is no longer available.
6-5
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
What types of pollutants
are regulated by NPDES?
Conventional pollutants are contained
in the sanitary wastes of households,
businesses, and industries. These pollu-
tants include human wastes, ground-up
food from sink disposals, and laundry
and bath waters. Conventional pollutants
include fecal coliform, oil and grease,
total suspended solids (TSS), biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD), and pH.
Toxic pollutants are particularly harm-
ful to animal or plant life. They are pri-
marily grouped into organics (including
pesticides, solvents, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), and dioxins) and metals
(including lead, silver, mercury, copper,
chromium, zinc, nickel, and cadmium).
Nonconventional pollutants are any
additional substances that are not con-
sidered conventional or toxic that may
require regulation. These include nutri-
ents such as nitrogen and phosphorus.
vidual permits require the submission of a
site drainage map, a narrative description of
the site that identifies potential pollutant
sources, and quantitative testing data for spe-
cific parameters. General permits usually
involve the submission of a Notice of Intent
(NOI) that includes only general information,
which is neither industry-specific or pollu-
tant-specific and typically do not require the
collection of monitoring data. NPDES general
storm-water permits typically require the
development and implementation of storm-
water pollution prevention plans and BMPs
to limit pollutants in storm-water discharges.
The EPA has also issued the Multi-Sector
General Permit (60 FR 50803; September 29,
1995) which covers 29 different industry sec-
tors. The Agency reviewed, on a sector-by-
sector basis, information concerning industri-
al activities, BMPs, materials stored outdoors,
and end-of-pipe storm-water sampling data.
Based on this review, EPA identified pollu-
tants of concern in each industry sector, the
sources of these pollutants, and the BMPs
used to control them. The Multi-Sector
General Permit requires the submission of an
NOI, as well as development and implemen-
tation of a site-specific pollution prevention
plan, as the basic storm-water control strategy
for each industry sector.
2. Discharges to Surface Waters
Most surface impoundments that are
addressed by the Guide are part of a facility's
wastewater treatment process that results in
an NPDES-permitted discharge to surface
waters. The NPDES permit only sets pollu-
tion limits for the final discharge of treated
wastewater. Generally, the NPDES permit
would not establish any regulatory require-
ments regarding the design or operation of
the surface impoundments that are part of
the treatment process except that, once
designed and constructed, a provision
requires use of those treatment processes
except in limited circumstances. Individual
state environmental agencies, under their
own statutory authorities, can impose
requirements on surface impoundment
design and operation.
B.
1.
National Pretreatment
Program
Description of the National
Pretreatment Program
For industrial facilities that discharge
wastewaters to publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) through domestic sewer lines,
pretreatment of the wastewater may be
required (40 CFR Part 403). Under the
6-6
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
National Pretreatment Program, EPA, states,
and local regulatory agencies establish dis-
charge limits to reduce the level of pollutants
discharged by industry into municipal sewer
systems. These limits control the pollutant
levels reaching a POTW, improve the quality
of the effluent and sludges produced by the
POTW, and increase the opportunity for ben-
eficial use of the end products (e.g., effluents,
sludges, etc). Further information about
industrial pretreatment and the National
Pretreatment Program is available on the
Office of Wastewater Management's Web page
at .
POTWs are designed to treat domestic
wastes and biodegradable commercial and
industrial wastes. The CWA and EPA define
the pollutants from these sources as "conven-
tional pollutants" which includes those spe-
cific pollutants that are expected to be
present in domestic discharges to POTWs.
Commercial and industrial facilities can,
however, discharge toxic pollutants that a
treatment plant is neither designed nor able
to remove. Such discharges, from both indus-
trial and commercial sources, can cause seri-
ous problems at POTWs. The undesirable
outcome of these discharges can be prevented
by using treatment techniques or manage-
ment practices to reduce or eliminate the dis-
charge of these pollutants.
The act of treating wastewater prior to dis-
charge to a POTW is commonly referred to as
"pretreatment." The National Pretreatment
Program provides the statutory and regulatory
basis to require non-domestic dischargers to
comply with pretreatment standards to ensure
that the goals of the CWA are attained. The
objectives of the National Pretreatment
Program are to:
• Prevent the introduction of pollutants
into POTWs which will interfere with
the operation of a POTW, including
interference with the disposal of
municipal sludge.
• Prevent the introduction of pollutants
into POTWs which will pass through
the treatment works or otherwise be
incompatible with such works.
• Improve opportunities to recycle and
reclaim municipal and industrial
waste waters and sludges.
To help accomplish these objectives, the
National Pretreatment Program is charged
with controlling 126 priority pollutants from
industries that discharge into sewer systems
as described in the CWA, Section 307(a), and
listed in 40 CFR Part 423 Appendix A. These
priority pollutants fall into two categories,
metals and toxic organics.
• The metals include lead, mercury,
chromium, and cadmium. Such toxic
metals cannot be destroyed or broken
down through treatment or environ-
mental degradation. They can cause
various human health problems such
as lead poisoning and cancer.
• The toxic organics include solvents,
pesticides, dioxins, and polychlorinat-
ed biphenyls (PCBs). These can be
cancer-causing and lead to other seri-
ous ailments, such as kidney and liver
damage, anemia, and heart failure.
The objectives of the National
Pretreatment Program are achieved by apply-
ing and enforcing three types of discharge
standards: 1) prohibited discharge standards
(provide for overall protection of POTWs), 2)
categorical standards applicable to specific
point source categories (provide for general
protection of POTWs), and 3) local limits
(address the water quality and other concerns
at specific POTWs).
Prohibited Discharge Standards. All
industrials users (IDs), whether or not subject
to any other federal, state, or local pretreat-
6-7
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
ment requirements, are subject to the general
and specific prohibitions identified in 40 CFR
Part 403.5 (a) and (b), respectively. General
prohibitions forbid the discharge of any pol-
lutant to a POTW that can pass through or
cause interference. Specific prohibitions for-
bid the discharge of pollutants that pose fire
or explosion hazards; corrosives; solid or vis-
cous pollutants in amounts that will obstruct
system flows; quantities of pollutants that will
interfere with POTW operations; heat that
inhibits biological activity; specific oils; pollu-
tants that can cause the release of toxic gases;
and pollutants that are hauled to the POTW
(except as authorized by the POTW).
Categorical Standards. Categorical pre-
treatment standards are national, uniform,
technology-based standards that apply to dis-
charges to POTWs from specific industrial
categories (e.g., battery manufacturing, coil
coating, grain mills, metal finishing, petrole-
um refining, rubber manufacturing) and limit
the discharge of specific pollutants. These
standards are described in 40 CFR Parts 405
through 471.
Categorical pretreatment standards can be
concentration-based or mass-based.
Concentration- based standards are expressed
as milligrams of pollutant allowed per liter of
wastewater discharged (mg/1) and are issued
where production rates for the particular
industrial category do not necessarily corre-
late with pollutant discharges. Mass-based
standards are generally expressed as a mass
per unit of production (e.g., milligrams of
pollutant per kilogram of product produced)
and are issued where production rates do
correlate with pollutant discharges. Thus,
limiting the amount of water discharge (i.e.,
water conservation) is important to reducing
the pollutant load to the POTW For a few
categories where reducing a facility's flow vol-
ume does not provide a significant difference
in the pollutant load discharged, EPA has
established both mass- and concentration-
based standards. Generally, both a daily maxi-
mum limitation and a long-term average
limitation (e.g., average daily values in a cal-
endar month) are established for each regu-
lated pollutant.
Local Limits. Federal regulations located
at 40 CFR Parts 403.8 (f) (4) and 122.21 (j)
(4) require authorities to evaluate the need
for local limits and, if necessary, implement
and enforce specific limits protective of that
POTW Local limits might be developed for
pollutants such as metals, cyanide, BOD, TSS,
oil & grease, and organics that can interfere
with or pass through the treatment works,
cause sludge contamination, or cause worker
health and safety problems if discharged at
excess levels.
All POTWs designed to accommodate
flows of more than 5 million gallons per day
and smaller POTWs with significant industri-
al discharges are required to establish pre-
treatment programs. The EPA Regions and
states with approved pretreatment programs
serve as approval authorities for the National
Pretreatment Program. In that capacity, they
review and approve requests for POTW pre-
treatment program approval or modification,
oversee POTW program implementation,
review requested modifications to categorical
pretreatment standards, provide technical
guidance to POTWs and IDs, and initiate
enforcement actions against noncompliant
POTWs and lUs.
2. Treatment of Waste at POTW
Plants
A waste treatment works' basic function is
to speed up the natural processes by which
water is purified and returned to receiving
lakes and streams. There are two basic stages
in the treatment of wastes, primary and sec-
ondary. In the primary stage, solids are
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
allowed to settle and are removed from
wastewater. The secondary stage uses biologi-
cal processes to further purify wastewater.
Sometimes, these stages are combined into
one operation. POTWs can also perform
other "advanced treatment" operations to
remove ammonia, phosphorus, pathogens
and other pollutants in order to meet effluent
discharge requirements.
Primary treatment. As sewage enters a
plant for treatment, it flows through a screen,
which removes large floating objects such as
rags and sticks that can clog pipes or damage
equipment. After sewage has been screened, it
passes into a grit chamber, where cinders,
sand, and small stones settle to the bottom. At
this point, the sewage still contains organic
and inorganic matter along with other sus-
pended solids. These solids are minute parti-
cles that can be removed from sewage by
treatment in a sedimentation tank. When the
speed of the flow of sewage through one of
these tanks is reduced, the suspended solids
will gradually sink to the bottom, where they
form a mass of solids called raw primary
sludge. Sludge is usually removed from tanks
by pumping, after which it can be further
treated for use as fertilizer, or disposed of
through incineration if necessary. To complete
primary treatment, effluent from the sedimen-
tation tank is usually disinfected with chlorine
before being discharged into receiving waters.
Sometimes chlorine is fed into the water to
kill pathogenic bacteria and to reduce
unpleasant odors.
Secondary treatment. The secondary stage
of treatment removes about 85 percent of the
organic matter in sewage by making use of the
bacteria in it. The two principal techniques
used in secondary treatment are trickling fil-
ters and the activated sludge process.
Trickling filters. A trickling filter is a bed of
stones from three to six feet deep through
which the sewage passes. More recently, inter-
locking pieces of corrugated plastic or other
synthetic media have also been used in trick-
ling beds. Bacteria gather and multiply on
these stones until they can consume most of
the organic matter in the sewage. The cleaner
water trickles out through pipes for further
treatment. From a trickling filter, the sewage
flows to another sedimentation tank to
remove excess bacteria. Disinfection of the
effluent with chlorine is generally used to
complete the secondary stage. Ultraviolet
light or ozone are also sometimes used in sit-
uations where residual chlorine would be
harmful to fish and other aquatic life.
Activated sludge. The activated sludge treat-
ment process speeds up the work of the bac-
teria by bringing air and sludge, heavily laden
with bacteria, into close contact with sewage.
After the sewage leaves the settling tank in
the primary stage, it is pumped into an aera-
tion tank, where it is mixed with air and
sludge loaded with bacteria and allowed to
remain for several hours. During this time,
the bacteria break down the organic matter
into harmless by-products. The sludge, now
activated with additional millions of bacteria
and other tiny organisms, can be used again
by returning it to the aeration tank for mixing
with new sewage and ample amounts of air.
From the aeration tank, the sewage flows to
another sedimentation tank to remove excess
bacteria. The final step is generally the addi-
tion of chlorine to the effluent.
Advanced treatment. New pollution
problems have created additional treatment
needs on wastewater treatment systems. Some
pollutants can be more difficult to remove
from water. Increased demands on the water
supply only aggravate the problem. These
challenges are being met through better and
more complete methods of removing pollu-
tants at treatment plants, or through preven-
tion of pollution at the source (refer to
6-9
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Chapter 3 - Integrating Pollution Prevention
for more information). Advanced waste treat-
ment techniques in use or under develop-
ment range from biological treatment capable
of removing nitrogen and phosphorus to
physical-chemical separation techniques such
as filtration, carbon adsorption, distillation,
and reverse osmosis. These wastewater treat-
ment processes, alone or in combination, can
achieve almost any degree of pollution con-
trol desired. As waste effluents are purified to
higher degrees by such treatment, the effluent
water can be used for industrial, agricultural,
or recreational purposes, or even as drinking
water supplies.
Understanding
Fate and
Transport of
Pollutants
How Do Pollutants
Move From Waste
Management Units To
Surface Water?
1. Overland Flow
The primary means by which pollutants
are transported to surface-water bodies is via
overland flow or "runoff." Runoff to surface
water is the amount of precipitation after all
"losses" have been subtracted. Losses include
infiltration into soils, interception by vegeta-
tion, depression storage and ponding, and
evapotranspiration (i.e., evaporation from the
soil and transpiration by plants).
A.
There is a correlation between the pollu-
tant loadings to surface water and the amount
of precipitation (rainfall, snow, etc.) that falls
on the watershed in which a waste manage-
ment unit is located. In addition, the charac-
teristics of the soil at a facility also influence
pollutant loading to surface water. If, for
example, the overland flow is diminished due
to high soil infiltration, so is the transport of
particulate pollutants to surface water. Also, if
wastes are land applied and surface overland
flow is generated by a rainfall event, a signifi-
cant portion of pollutants can be moved over
land into adjacent surface water.
A diagram representing rainfall transforma-
tion into runoff and other components of the
hydrologic cycle is shown in Chapter 7:
Section A-Assessing Risk. The first stage of
runoff formation is condensation of atmos-
pheric moisture into rain droplets or
snowflakes. During this process, water comes
in contact with atmospheric pollutants. The
pollution content of rainwater can therefore
reach high levels. In addition, rain water dis-
What is "runoff?"
Runoff is water or leachate that drains
or flows over the land from any part of a
waste management unit.
What is "run-on?"
Run-on is water from outside a waste
management unit that flows into the
unit. Run-on includes storm water from
rainfall or the melting of snow or ice
that falls directly on the unit, as well as
the water that drains from adjoining
areas.
6-10
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
solves atmospheric carbon dioxide and sulfur
and nitrogen oxides, and acts as a weak acid
after it hits the ground, reacting with soil and
limestone formations. Overland flow begins
after rain particles reach the earth's surface
(note that during winter months runoff for-
mation can be delayed by snowpack forma-
tion and subsequent melting). Rain hitting an
exposed waste management unit will liberate
and pick up particulates and pollutants from
the unit and can also dissolve other chemicals
it comes in contact with. Precipitation that
flows into a waste management unit, called
"run-on," can also free-up and subsequently
transport pollutants out of the unit. Runoff
carries the pollutants from the waste manage-
ment unit as it flows downgradient following
the natural contours of the watershed to
nearby lakes, rivers, or wetland areas.
2. Ground Water to Surface
Water
Ground water and surface water are funda-
mentally interconnected. In fact, it is often
difficult to separate the two because they
"feed" each other. As a result, pollutants can
move from one media to another. Shallow
water table aquifers interact closely with
streams, sometimes discharging water into a
stream or lake and sometimes receiving water
from the stream or lake. Many rivers, lakes,
and wetlands rely heavily on ground-water
discharge as a source of water. During times
of low precipitation, some bodies of water
would not contain any water at all if it were
not for ground-water discharge.
An unconfined aquifer that feeds a stream
is said to provide the stream's "baseflow"
Gravity is the dominant driving force in
ground-water movement in unconfined
aquifers. As such, under natural conditions,
ground water moves "downhill" until it
reaches the land surface at a spring or
through a seep in the side or bottom of a
river bed, lake, wetland, or other surface-
water body. Ground water can also leave the
aquifer via the pumping of a well. The
process of ground water outflowing into a
surface-water body or leaving the aquifer
through pumping is called discharge.
Discharge from confined aquifers occurs in
much the same way except that pressure,
rather than gravity, is the driving force in
moving ground water to the surface. When
the intersection between the aquifer and the
land's surface is natural, the pathway is called
a spring. If discharge occurs through a well,
that well is a "flowing artesian well."
3. Air to Surface Water
Pollutants released into the air are carried
by wind patterns away from their place of
origin. Depending on weather conditions and
the chemical and physical properties of the
pollutants, pollutants can be carried signifi-
cant distances from their source and can
undergo physical and chemical changes as
they travel. Some of these chemical changes
include the formation of new pollutants such
as ozone, which is formed from nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and hydrocarbons.
Atmospheric deposition occurs when pol-
lutants in the air fall on the land or surface
waters. When pollutants are deposited in
snow, fog, or rain, the process is called wet
deposition, while the deposition of pollutants
as dry particles or gases is called dry deposi-
tion. Pollutants can be deposited into water
bodies either directly from the air onto the
surface of the water, or through indirect
deposition, where the pollutants settle on the
land and are then carried into a water body
by runoff.
6-11
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Any pollutant that is emitted into the air
can become a surface-water problem due to
deposition. Some of the common pollutants
that can be transported to surface-water bod-
ies via air include different forms of nitrogen,
mercury, copper, polychlorinated biphenols
(PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), chlordane, dieldrin, lead, lindane,
polycyclic organic matter (POM), dioxins,
and furans.
B. What Happens When
Pollutants Enter Surface
Water?
All pollutants entering surface water via
runoff, ground-water infiltration, or air trans-
port have an effect on the aquatic ecosystem.
Additive and synergistic effects are also fac-
tors because many different pollutants can
enter a surface-water body from diverse
sources and activities. As such, solutions to
water quality problems are best achieved by
looking at all activities and inputs to surface
water in a watershed.
Surface-water ecosystems (i.e., rivers,
lakes, wetlands, estuaries) are considered to
be in a dynamic equilibrium with their inputs
and surroundings. These ecosystems can be
divided into two components, the biotic (liv-
ing) and abiotic (nonliving). Pollutants are
continually moving between the two. For
example, pollutants can move from the abiot-
ic environment (i.e., the water column) into
aquatic organisms, such as fish. The intake of
the pollutant can occur as water moves across
the gills or directly through the skin. Toxic
pollutants can accumulate in fish (known as
bioaccumulation), as the fish uptakes more of
the pollutant than it can metabolize or
excrete. Pollutants can eventually concentrate
in an organism to a level where death results.
At that point, the pollutants will be released
The Dissolved Oxygen
Problem
The dissolved oxygen balance is an
important water quality consideration
for streams and estuaries. Dissolved oxy-
gen is the most important parameter for
protecting fish and other aquatic organ-
isms. Runoff with a high concentration
of biodegradable organics (organic mat-
ter) can have a serious effect on the
amount of dissolved oxygen in the
water. Low dissolved oxygen levels can
be very detrimental to fish. The content
of organic matter in waste discharges is
commonly expressed as the biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) load. Organic
matter can come from a variety of
sources, including waste management
units. When runoff containing organic
matter is introduced into receiving
waters, decomposers immediately begin
to breakdown the organic matter using
dissolved oxygen to do so. Further, if
there are numerous inputs of organic
matter into a single water body, for
example a stream, the effects will be
additive (i.e., more and more dissolved
oxygen will be removed from the stream
as organic matter is added along the
stream reach and decomposes). This is
also an example of how an input that
might not be considered a pollutant
(i.e., organic matter) can lead to harmful
effects due to the naturally occurring
process within a surface-water body.
back into the abiotic environment as the
organism decays.
Pollutants can also move within the abiotic
environment, as for example, between water
and its bottom sediments. Pollutants that are
attached to soil particles being carried down-
6-12
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
stream will be deposited on the bottom of the
streambed as the particles fall out of the
water column. In this manner, pollutants can
accumulate in areas of low flow. Thus, it is
obvious that the hydrodynamical, biological,
and chemical processes in aquatic systems
cannot be separated and must be addressed
simultaneously when considering pollutant
loads and impacts to surface water. Table 1
presents some additional information on the
biological and chemical processes that occur
in water bodies.
C. Pollutants Of Concern
As you assess the different types of best
management practices (BMPs) that can be
used at waste management units to protect
surface waters (discussed in Section IV of this
chapter), you should also identify the pollu-
tants in the unit that pose the greatest threats
to surface water. Factors to consider include
the solubility of the constituents in the waste
management unit, how easily these potential
pollutants can be mobilized, degradation
rates, vapor pressures, and biochemical decay
coefficients of the pollutants and any other
factors that could encourage their release into
the environment.
While all pollutants can become toxic at
high enough levels, there are a number of
compounds that are toxic at relatively low
levels. These pollutants have been designated
by the EPA as priority pollutants. The list of
priority pollutants is included in Table 2. The
list of priority pollutants is continuously
under review by EPA and is periodically
updated. The majority of pollutants on the
list are classified as organic chemicals. Others
are heavy metals which are being mobilized
into the environment by human activities at
rates greatly exceeding those of natural geo-
logical processes. Several of the priority pol-
lutants are also considered carcinogenic (i.e.,
they can increase the risk of cancer to the
human population or to aquatic organisms,
such as fish). Priority pollutants of particular
concern for surface-water bodies include:
• Metals, such as cadmium, copper,
chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and
zinc, that arise from industrial opera-
tions, mining, transportation, and
agricultural use.
• Organic compounds, such as pesti-
cides, PCBs, solvents, petroleum
hydrocarbons, organometallic com-
pounds, phenols, formaldehyde, and
biochemical methylation of metals in
aquatic sediments.
• Dissolved gases, such as chlorine and
ammonium.
• Anions, such as cyanides, fluorides,
sulfides, and sulphates.
• Acids and alkalis.
IV. Protecting
Surface Waters
A. Controls to Address
Surface-Water
Contamination from
Overland Flow
Protecting surface water entails preventing
storm-water contamination during both the
construction of a waste management unit and
the operational life of the unit. During con-
struction the primary concern is sediment
eroding from exposed soil surfaces.
Temporary sediment and erosion control
measures, such as silt fences around con-
struction perimeters, straw bales around
storm-water inlets, and seeding or straw cov-
ering of exposed slopes, are typically used to
limit and manage erosion. States or local
6-13
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Table 1. Biological and Chemical Processes Occurring in Surface-Water Bodies
After pollutants are transported to lakes, rivers, and other water bodies, they can be subject to a
variety of biological and chemical processes that affect how they will interact and impact the aquat-
ic ecosystem. These processes determine how pollutants are mobilized, degraded, or released into
the biotic and abiotic environments.
Metabolism of a toxicant consists of a series of chemical transformations that take place within
an organism. A wide range of enzymes act on toxicants, that can increase water solubility, and facil-
itate elimination from the organism. In some cases, however, metabolites can be more toxic than
their parent compound. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed. Government
Institutes.
Bioaccumulation is the uptake and sequestration of pollutants by organisms from their ambient
environment. Typically, the concentration of the substance in the organism exceeds the concentra-
tion in the environment since the organism will store the substance and not excrete it. Phillips.
1993. In: Calow (ed), Handbook of Ecotoxicology, Volume One. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Biomagnification is the concentration of certain substances up a food chain. It is a very impor-
tant mechanism in concentrating pesticides and heavy metals in organisms such as fish. Certain
substances such as pesticides and heavy metals move up the food chain, work their way into a river
or lake and are eaten by large birds, other animals, or humans. The substances become concentrat-
ed in tissues or internal organs as they move up the chain. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory
Glossary, 6th Ed. Government Institutes.
Biological degradation is the decomposition of a substance into more elementary compounds
by action of microorganisms such as bacteria. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th
Ed. Government Institutes.
Hydrolysis is a chemical process of decomposition in which the elements of water react with
another substance to yield one or more new substances. This transformation process changes the
chemical structure of the substance. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed.
Government Institutes.
Precipitation is a chemical or physical change whereby a pollutant moves from a dissolved form
in a solution to a solid or insoluble form and subsequently drops out of the solution. Precipitation
reduces the mobility of constituents, such as metals and is not generally reversible. Boulding. 1995.
Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation.
Oxidation/Reduction (Redox) process is a complex of biochemical reactions in sediment that
influences the valence state of elements (and their ions) found in sediments. Under anaerobic con-
ditions the overall process shifts to a reducing condition. The chemical properties for elements can
change substantially with changes in the oxidation state. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory
Glossary, 6th Ed. Government Institutes.
Photochemical process is the chemical changes brought about by the radiant energy of the sun
acting upon various polluting substances. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed.
Government Institutes.
6-14
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
001 Acenaphthene
002 Acrolein
003 Acrylonitrile
004 Benzene
005 Benzidine
006 Carbon tetrachloride
007 Chlorobenzene
008 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
009 Hexachlorobenzene
010 1,2-dichloroethane
Oil 1,1,1-trichloreothane
012 Hexachloroethane
013 1,1-dichloroethane
014 1,1,2-trichloroethane
015 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
016 Chloroethane
017 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
018 2-chloroethyl vinyl ethers
019 2-chloronaphthalene
020 2,4,6-trichlorophenol
021 Parachlorometa cresol
022 Chloroform
023 2-chlorophenol
024 1,2-dichlorobenzene
025 1,3-dichlorobenzene
026 1,4-dichlorobenzene
027 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
028 1,1-dichloroethylene
029 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene
030 2,4-dichlorophenol
031 1,2-dichloropropane
032 1,2-dichloropropylene
033 2,4-dimethylphenol
034 2,4-dinitrotoluene
035 2,6-dinitrotoluene
036 1,2-diphenylhydrazine
037 Ethylbenzene
038 Fluoranthene
039 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
040 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
041 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
042 Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Table 2. Priority Pollutants3
043 Methylene chloride
044 Methyl chloride
045 Methyl bromide
046 Bromoform
047 Dichlorobromomethane
048 Chlorodibromomethane
049 Hexachlorobutadiene
050 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
051 Isophorone
052 Naphthalene
053 Nitrobenzene
054 2-nitrophenol
055 4-nitrophenol
056 2,4-dinitrophenol
057 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
058 N-nitrosodimethylamine
059 N-nitrosodiphenylamine
060 N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
061 Pentachlorophenol
062 Phenol
063 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
064 Butyl benzyl phthalate
065 Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
066 Di-n-octyl phthalate
067 Diethyl Phthalate
068 Dimethyl phthalate
069 Benzo(a) anthracene
070 Benzo(a)pyrene
071 Benzo(b) fluoranthene
072 Benzo(b) fluoranthene
073 Chrysene
074 Acenaphthylene
075 Anthracene
076 Benzo(ghi) perylene
077 Fluorene
078 Phenanthrene
079 Dibenzo(,h) anthracene
080 Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
081 Pyrene
082 Tetrachloroethylene
083 Toluene
084 Trichloroethylene
085 Vinyl chloride
086 Aldrin
087 Dieldrin
088 Chlordane
089 4,4-DDT
090 4,4-DDE
091 4,4-DDD
092 Alpha-endosulfan
093 Beta-endosulfan
094 Endosulfan sulfate
095 Endrin
096 Endrin aldehyde
097 Heptachlor
098 Heptachlor epoxide
099 Alpha-BHC
100 Beta-BHC
101 Gamma-BHC
102 Delta-BHC
103 PCB-1242
104 PCB-1254
105 PCB-1221
106 PCB-1232
107 PCB-1248
108 PCB-1260
109 PCB-1016
110 Toxaphene
111 Antimony
112 Arsenic
113 Asbestos
114 Beryllium
115 Cadmium
116 Chromium
117 Copper
118 Cyanide, Total
119 Lead
120 Mercury
121 Nickel
122 Selenium
123 Silver
124 Thallium
125 Zinc
126 2,3,7,8-TCDD
The list of pollutants is current as of the Federal Register dated April 2, 2001.
6-15
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
municipalities often require the use of sedi-
ment and erosion controls at any construc-
tion site disturbing greater than a certain
number of acres, and can have additional
requirements in especially sensitive water-
sheds. You should consult with the state and
local regulatory agencies to determine the
sediment and erosion control requirements
for construction.
Once a waste management unit has been
constructed, permanent run-on and runoff
controls are necessary to protect surface
water. Run-on controls are designed to pre-
vent storm water from entering the active
areas of units. If run-on is not prevented
from entering active areas, it can seep into
the waste and increase the amount of
leachate that must be managed. It can also
deposit pollutants from nearby sites, such as
pesticides from adjoining farms, further bur-
dening treatment systems. Excessive run-on
can also damage earthen containment sys-
tems, such as dikes and berms. Run-on that
contacts the waste can carry pollutants into
receiving waters through overland runoff or
into ground water through infiltration. You
can divert run-on to the waste management
unit by taking advantage of natural contours
in the land or by constructing ditches or
berms designed to intercept and drain storm
water away from the unit. Run-on diversion
systems should be designed to handle the
peak discharge of a design storm event (e.g.,
a 24-hour, 25-year storm4). Also note that
surface impoundments should be designed
with sufficient freeboard and adequate capac-
ity to accommodate not only waste, but also
precipitation and run-on.
Runoff controls can channel, divert, and
convey storm water to treatment facilities or,
if appropriate, to other intended discharge
points. Runoff from landfills, land treatment
units, or waste piles should be managed as a
potentially contaminated material. The runoff
from active areas of a landfill or waste pile
should be managed as leachate. You should
design a leachate collection and removal sys-
tem to handle the potentially contaminated
runoff, in addition to the leachate that might
be generated by the unit. You should segre-
gate noncontact runoff to reduce the volume
that will need to be treated as leachate. The
Multi-Sector General Permit does not autho-
rize discharges of leachate which includes
storm water that comes in contact with
waste. The discharge of leachate would be
regulated under either an individually drafted
NPDES permit with site- specific discharge
limitations, or an alternative NPDES general
permit if one is available. Note that for land
application sites, runoff from the site can also
adversely affect nearby surface water if pollu-
tants are picked up and carried overland.
BMPs are measures used to reduce or
eliminate pollutant releases to surface waters
via overland flow. They fall into three cate-
gories, baseline, activity-specific, and site-
specific, and can take the form of a process,
activity, or physical structure. The use of
Why are "run-on" controls necessary?
Run-on controls are designed to pre-
vent: 1) contamination of storm water,
2) erosion that can damage the physical
structure of units, 3) surface discharge
of waste constituents, 4) creation of
leachate, and 5) already contaminated
surface water from entering the unit.
What is the purpose of a "runoff"
control system?
Runoff control systems are designed
to collect and control at a minimum the
water flow resulting from a storm event
of a specified duration, such as a 24-
hour, 25-year storm event.
6-16
4 This discharge is the amount of water resulting from a 24-hour rainfall event of a magnitude with a 4
percent statistical likelihood of occurring in any given year (i.e, once every 25 years). Such an event
might not occur in a given 25-year period, or might occur more than once during a single year.
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
BMPs to protect surface water should be con-
sidered in both the design and operation of a
waste management unit. Before identifying
and implementing BMPs, you should assess
the potential sources of storm-water contami-
nation including possible erosion and sedi-
ment discharges caused by storm events. A
thorough assessment of a waste management
unit involves several steps including creating
a map of the waste management
unit area; considering the design
of the unit; identifying areas
where spills, leaks, or discharges
could or do occur; inventorying
the types of wastes contained in
the unit; and reviewing current
operating practices (refer to
Chapter 8-Operating the Waste
Management System for more
information). Figure 1 illustrates
the process of identifying and
selecting the most appropriate
BMPs.
Designing a storm-water
management system to protect
surface water involves knowl-
edge of local precipitation pat-
terns, surrounding topographic
features, and geologic condi-
tions. You should consider sam-
pling runoff to ascertain the
quantity and concentration of
pollutants being discharged.
(Refer to the Chapter 9-
Monitoring Performance for
more information). Collecting
and evaluating this type of infor-
mation can help you to select
the most appropriate BMPs to
prevent or control pollutant dis-
charges. The same considera-
tions (e.g., types of wastes to be
contained in the unit, precipita-
tion patterns, local topography
and geology) should be made
while designing and constructing a new waste
management unit to ensure that the proper
baseline, activity-specific, and site-specific
BMPs are implemented and installed from the
start of operations. After assessing the poten-
tial and existing sources of storm-water conta-
mination, the next step is to select appropriate
BMPs to address these contamination sources.
Figure 1. BMP Identification and Selection Flow Chart
Recommended Steps
Assessment Phase
Develop a site map
Inventory and describe exposed materials
List significant spills and leaks
Identify areas associated with industrial activity
Test for nonstorm-water discharges
Evaluate monitoring/sampling data if appropriate
(see Chapter 9-Monitoring Performance)
BMP Identification Phase
Operational BMPs
Source control BMPs
Erosion and sediment control BMPs
Treatment BMPs
Innovative BMPs
Implementation Phase
Implement BMPs
Train employees
Evaluation/Monitoring Phase
Conduct semiannual inspection/BMP evaluation (see
Chapter 8-Operating the Waste Management System)
Conduct recordkeeping
Monitor surface water if appropriate
Review and revise plan
Adapted from U.S. EPA, 1992e.
6-17
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
1.
Baseline BMPs
These practices are, for the most part,
inexpensive and relatively simple. They focus
on preventing circumstances that could lead
to surface-water contamination before it can
occur. Many industrial facilities already have
these measures in place for product loss pre-
vention, accident and fire prevention, worker
health and safety, or compliance with other
regulations (refer to Chapter 8-Operating the
Waste Management System for more informa-
tion) . Baseline BMPs include the measures
summarized below.
Good housekeeping. A clean and orderly
work environment is an effective first step
toward preventing contamination of run-on
and runoff. You should conduct an inventory
of all materials and store them so as to pre-
vent leaks and spills and, if appropriate,
maintain them in areas protected from pre-
cipitation and other elements.
Preventive maintenance. A maintenance
program should be in place and should
include inspection, upkeep, and repair of the
waste management unit and any measures
specifically designed to protect surface water.
Visual inspections. Inspections of sur-
face-water protection measures and waste
management unit areas should be conducted
to uncover potential problems and identify
necessary changes. Areas deserving close
attention include previous spill locations;
material storage, handling, and transfer areas;
and waste storage, treatment, and disposal
areas. Any problems such as leaks or spills
that could lead to surface-water contamina-
tion should be corrected as soon as practical.
Spill prevention and response. General
operating practices for safety and spill pre-
vention should be established to reduce acci-
dental releases that could contaminate
run-on and runoff. Spill response plans
should be developed to prevent any acciden-
tal releases from reaching surface water.
Mitigation practices. These practices con-
tain, clean-up, or recover spilled, leaked, or
loose material before it can reach surface
water and cause contamination. Other BMPs
should be considered and implemented to
avoid releases, but procedures for mitigation
should be devised so that unit personnel can
react quickly and effectively to any releases
that do occur. Mitigation practices include
sweeping or shoveling loose waste into
appropriate areas of the unit; vacuuming or
pumping spilled materials into appropriate
treatment or handling systems; cleaning up
liquid waste or leachate using sorbents such
as sawdust; and applying gelling agents to
prevent spilled liquid from flowing towards
surface water.
Training employees to operate, inspect,
and maintain surface-water protection mea-
sures is itself considered a BMP, as is keeping
records of installation, inspection, mainte-
nance, and performance of surface-water pro-
tection measures. For more information on
employee training and record keeping, refer
to Chapter 8-Operating the Waste
Management System.
2. Activity-Specific BMPs
After assessment and implementation of
baseline BMPs, you should also consider
planning for activity-specific BMPs. Like
baseline BMPs, they are often procedural
rather than structural or physical measures,
and they are often inexpensive and easy to
implement. In the BMP manual for industrial
facilities, Storm Water Management for
Industrial Activities: Developing Pollution
Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices
(U.S. EPA, 1992f), EPA developed activity-
specific BMPs for nine industrial activities,
including waste management. The BMPs that
6-18
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
are relevant to waste management are sum-
marized below.
Preventing waste leaks and dust emis-
sions due to vehicular travel. To prevent
leaks, you should ensure that trucks moving
waste into and around a waste management
unit have baffles (if they carry liquid waste)
or sealed gates, spill guards, or tarpaulin cov-
ers (if the waste is solid or semisolid). To
minimize tracking dust off site where it can
be picked up by storm water, wash trucks in
a curbed truck wash area where wash water
is captured and properly handled. For more
information on these topics, consult Chapter
8-Operating the Waste Management System .
You should be aware that washwater from
vehicle and equipment cleaning is considered
to be "process waste water," and is not eligible
for discharge under the Multi-Sector General
Permit program for industrial storm-water
discharges. Such discharges would require
coverage under either a site-specific individ-
ual NPDES permit or an NPDES general
storm-water permit.
For land application, choosing appropri-
ate slopes. You should minimize runoff by
designing a waste management unit site with
slopes less than six percent. Moderate slopes
help reduce storm-water runoff velocity
which encourages infiltration and reduces
erosion and sedimentation. Note that storm-
water discharges from land application units
are regulated under the Multi-Sector General
Permit program.
3. Site-Specific BMPs
In addition to baseline and activity-specific
BMPs, you should also consider site-specific
BMPs, which are more advanced measures
tailored to specific pollutant sources at a par-
ticular waste management unit and usually
consist of the installation of structural or
physical measures. These site-specific BMPs
can be grouped into five areas: flow diver-
sion, exposure minimization, erosion and
sedimentation prevention, infiltration, and
other prevention practices. For many of the
surface-water protection measures described
in this section, it is important to design for an
appropriate storm event (i.e., structures that
control run-on and runoff should be designed
for the discharge of a 24-hour, 25-year storm
event).
When selecting and designing surface-
water protection measures or systems, you
should consult state, regional, and local
watershed management organizations. Some
of these organizations maintain management
plans devised at the overall watershed level
that address storm-water control. Thus, these
agencies might be able to offer guidance in
developing surface-water protection systems
for optimal coordination with other dis-
charges in the watershed. Again, after site-
specific BMPs have been installed, you should
evaluate the effectiveness of the selected
BMPs on a regular basis to ensure that they
are functioning properly .
BMP Maintenance
BMPs must be maintained on a regu-
lar basis to ensure adequate surface-
water protection. Maintenance is
important because storms can damage
surface-water protection measures such
as storage basin embankments or spill-
ways. Runoff can also cause sediments
to settle in storage basins or ditches and
can carry floatables (i.e., tree branches,
lumber, leaves, litter) to the basin.
Facilities might need to repair storm-
water controls and periodically remove
sediment and floatables.
6-19
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
a.
Flow Diversion
Flow diversion can be used to protect sur-
face water in two ways. First, it can channel
storm water away from waste management
units to minimize contact of storm water
with waste. Second, it can carry polluted or
potentially polluted materials to treatment
facilities. Flow diversion mechanisms include
storm-water conveyances and diversion
dikes.
Storm-Water Conveyances (Channels, Gutters,
Drains, and Sewers)
Storm-water conveyances, such as chan-
nels, gutters, drains, and sewers, can prevent
storm-water run-on from entering a waste
management unit or runoff from leaving a
unit untreated. Some conveyances collect
storm water and route it around waste man-
agement units or other waste containment
areas to prevent contact with the waste,
which might otherwise contaminate storm
water with pollutants. Other conveyances
collect water that potentially came into con-
tact with the waste management unit and
carry it to a treatment plant (or possibly back
to the unit for reapplication in the case of
land application units, some surface
impoundments, and leachate-recirculating
landfills). Conveyances should not mix the
stream of storm water diverted around the
unit with that of water that might have con-
tacted waste. Remember, storm water that
contacts waste is considered leachate and can
only be discharged in accordance with an
NPDES permit other than the Multi-Sector
General Permit.
Storm-water conveyances can be con-
structed of or lined with materials such as
concrete, clay tile, asphalt, plastic, metal,
riprap, compacted soil, and vegetation. The
material used will vary depending on the use
of the conveyance and the expected intensity
of storm-water flow. Storm-water con-
What are some advantages of
conveyances?
Conveyances direct storm-water flows
around industrial areas, waste manage-
ment units, or other waste containment
areas to prevent temporary flooding;
require little maintenance; and provide
long-term control of storm-water flows.
What are some disadvantages of
conveyances?
Conveyances require routing through
stabilized structures to minimize erosion.
They also can increase flow rates, might
be impractical if there are space limita-
tions, and might not be economical.
veyances should be designed with a capacity
to accept the estimated storm-water flow
associated with the selected design storm
event. Section V of this chapter discusses
methods for determining storm water flow.
Diversion Dikes
Diversion dikes, often made with compact-
ed soil, direct run-on away from a waste man-
agement unit. Dikes are built uphill from a
unit and usually work with storm-water con-
veyances to divert storm water from the unit.
To minimize the potential for erosion, diver-
sion dikes are often constructed to redirect
runoff at a shallow slope to minimize its
velocity. A similar means of flow diversion is
grading the area around the waste manage-
ment unit to keep storm water away from the
area, instead of or in addition to using diver-
sion dikes to redirect water that would other-
wise flow into these areas. In planning for the
installation of dikes, you should consider the
slope of the drainage area, the height of the
dike, the size of the flow it will need to divert,
6-20
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
and the type of conveyance that will be used
with the dike.
b. Exposure Minimization
Like flow diversion, exposure minimiza-
tion practices, such as curbing, diking, and
covering can reduce contact of storm water
with waste. They often are small structures
immediately covering or surrounding a high-
er risk area, while flow diversion practices
operate on the scale of an entire waste man-
agement unit.
Curbing and Diking
These are raised borders enclosing areas
where liquid spills can occur. Such areas
could include waste transfer points in land
application, truck washes, and leachate man-
agement areas at landfills and waste piles.
The raised dikes or curbs prevent spilled liq-
uids from flowing to surface waters, enabling
prompt cleanup of only a small area.
Covering
Erecting a roof, tarpaulin, or other perma-
nent or temporary covering (see Figure 2)
over the active area of a landfill or waste
transfer location can keep precipitation from
falling directly on waste materials and pre-
vent run-on from occurring. If temporary
coverings are used, you should ensure that
sufficient weight is attached to prevent wind
from moving the cover, and to repair or
replace the cover material if holes or leaks
develop.
c. Erosion and Sedimentation
Prevention
Erosion and sedimentation practices serve to
limit erosion (the weathering of soil or rock
particles from the ground by wind, water, or
human activity) and to prevent particles that
are eroded from reaching surface waters as sed-
What are some advantages of
diversion dikes?
Diversion dikes limit storm-water
flows over industrial site areas; can be
economical, temporary structures when
built from soil onsite; and can be con-
verted from temporary to permanent at
any time.
What are some disadvantages of
diversion dikes?
Diversion dikes are not suitable for
large drainage areas unless there is a
gentle slope and might require mainte-
nance after heavy rains.
iment. Erosion and sedimentation can threaten
aquatic life, increase treatment costs for down-
stream water treatment plants, and impede
recreational and navigational uses of water-
ways. Erosion and sedimentation are of particu-
lar concern at waste management units because
the sediment can be contaminated with waste
constituents and because erosion can undercut
or otherwise weaken waste containment struc-
tures. Practices such as vegetation, interceptor
dikes, pipe slope drains, silt fences, storm drain
inlet protection, collection and sedimentation
basins, check dams, terraces and benches, and
outlet protection can help limit erosion and
sedimentation.
Vegetation
Erosion and sedimentation can be reduced
by ensuring that areas where storm water is
likely to flow are vegetated. Vegetation slows
erosion and sedimentation by shielding soil
surfaces from rainfall, improving the soil's
water storage capacity, holding soil in place,
slowing runoff, and filtering out sediment.
One method of providing vegetation is to pre-
serve natural growth. This is achieved by
6-21
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Figure 2. Coverings
Roof, overhang, or other
permanent structure
Tarp or other covering
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
managing the construction of the waste man-
agement unit to minimize disturbance of sur-
rounding grass and plants. If it is not possible
to leave all areas surrounding a unit undis-
turbed, preserve strips of existing vegetation
as buffer zones in strategically chosen areas of
the site where erosion and sediment control is
most needed, such as on steep slopes uphill
of the unit and along stream banks downhill
from the unit. If it is not possible to leave suf-
ficient buffer zones of existing vegetation, you
should create buffer zones by planting such
areas with new vegetation.
Temporary or permanent seeding of erodi-
ble areas is another means of controlling ero-
sion and sedimentation using vegetation.
Permanent seeding, often of grass, is appro-
priate for establishing long-term ground
cover after construction and other land-dis-
turbing activities are complete. Temporary
seeding can help prevent erosion and sedi-
mentation in areas that are exposed but will
not be disturbed again for a considerable
time. These areas include soil stockpiles,
temporary roadbanks, and dikes. Local regu-
lations might require temporary seeding of
areas that would otherwise remain exposed
beyond a certain period of time. You should
consult local officials to determine whether
such requirements apply. Seeding might not
be feasible for quickly establishing cover in
arid climates or during nongrowing seasons
in other climates. Sod, although more expen-
sive, can be more tolerant of these conditions
than seed and establish a denser grass cover
more quickly. Compost used in combination
with seeding can also be used effectively to
establish vegetation on slopes.
Physical and chemical stabilization, and
various methods of providing cover are also
often considered in conjunction with vegeta-
tive measures or when vegetative measures
cannot be used. Physical stabilization is
appropriate where stream flow might be
increased due to construction or other activi-
ties associated with the waste management
unit and where vegetative measures are not
practical. Stream-bank stabilization might
involve the reinforcement of stream banks
with stones, concrete or asphalt, logs, or
gabions (i.e., structures formed from crushed
rock encased in wire mesh). Methods of pro-
viding cover such as mulching, compost, mat-
ting, and netting can be used to cover
surfaces that are steep, arid, or otherwise
unsuitable for planting. These methods also
can work in conjunction with planting to sta-
bilize and protect seeds. (Mattings are sheets
of mulch that are more stable than loose
mulch chips. Netting is a mesh of jute, wood
fiber, plastic, paper, or cotton that can hold
mulch on the ground or stabilize soils. These
measures are sometimes used with seeding to
provide insulation, protect against birds, and
hold seeds and soil in place.) Chemical stabi-
lization (also known as chemical mulch, soil
6-22
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
binder, or soil palliative) can hold the soil in
place and protect against erosion by spraying
vinyl, asphalt, or rubber onto soil surfaces.
Erosion and sediment control is immediate
upon spraying and does not depend on cli-
mate or season. Stabilizer should be applied
according to manufacturer's instructions to
ensure that water quality is not affected.
Coating large areas with thick layers of stabi-
lizer, however, can create an impervious sur-
face and speed runoff to downgradient areas
and should be avoided.
Interceptor Dikes and Swales
Dikes (ridges of compacted soil) and
swales (excavated depressions in which storm
water flows) work together to prevent entry
of run-on into erodible areas. A dike is built
across a slope upgradient of an area to be
protected, such as a waste management unit,
with a swale just above the dike. Water flows
down the slope, accumulates in the swale,
and is blocked from exiting it by the dike.
The swale is graded to direct water slowly
downhill across the slope to a stabilized out-
let structure. Since flows are concentrated in
the swale, it is important to vegetate the
swale to prevent erosion of its channel and to
grade it so that predicted flows will not dam-
age the vegetation.
Pipe Slope Drains
Pipe slope drains are flexible pipes or
hoses used to traverse a slope that is already
damaged or at high risk of erosion. They are
often used in conjunction with some means
of blocking water flow on the slope, such as a
dike. Water collects against the dike and is
then channeled to one point along the dike
where it enters the pipe, which conveys it
downhill to a stabilized (usually riprap-lined)
outlet area at the bottom of the slope. You
should ensure that pipes are of adequate size
to accommodate the design storm event and
are kept clear of clogs.
Silt Fences, Straw Bales, and Brush Barriers
Silt fences and straw bales (see Figures 3
and 4) are temporary measures designed to
capture sediment that has already eroded and
reduce the velocity of storm water. Silt fences
and straw bales should not be considered
permanent measures unless fences are main-
tained on a routine basis and straw bales are
replaced regularly. They could be used, for
example, during construction of a waste man-
agement unit or on a final cover before per-
manent grass growth is established.
Silt fences consist of geotextile fabric sup-
ported by wooden posts. These fences slow
the flow of storm water and retain sediment as
the water filters through the fabric. If properly
installed, straw bales perform a similar func-
tion. Straw bales should be placed end to end
(with no gaps in between) in a shallow, exca-
vated trench and staked into place. Silt fences
and straw bales limit sediment from entering
receiving waters if properly maintained. Both
measures require frequent inspection and
maintenance, including checking for channels
eroded beneath the fence or bales, removing
What are some advantages of silt
fences, straw bales, and brush barriers?
They prevent eroded materials from
reaching surface waters and prevent
downstream damage from sediment
deposits at minimal cost.
What are some disadvantages of silt
fences, straw bales, and brush barriers?
These measures are not appropriate
for streams or large swales and pose a
risk of washouts if improperly installed.
6-23
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
accumulated sediment, and replacing dam-
aged or deteriorated sections.
Brush barriers work like silt fences and
straw bales but are constructed of readily
available materials. They consist of brush and
other vegetative debris piled in a row and are
often covered with filter fabric to hold them
in place and increase sediment interception.
Brush barriers are inexpensive due to their
reuse of material that is likely available from
clearing the site. New vegetation often grows
in the organic material of a brush barrier,
helping anchor the barrier with roots.
Depending on the material used, it might be
possible to leave a former brush barrier in
place and allow it to biodegrade, rather than
remove it.
Storm Drain Inlet Protection
Filtering measures placed around inlets or
drains to trap sediment are known as inlet
protection (see Figure 5). These measures
prevent sediment from entering inlets or
drains and possibly making their way to the
receiving waters into which the storm
drainage system discharges. Keeping sediment
out of storm-water drainage systems also
serves to prevent clogging, loss of capacity,
and other problems associated with siltation
of drainage structures. Inlet protection meth-
ods include sod, excavated areas for settle-
ment of sediment, straw bales or filter fences,
and gravel or stone with wire mesh. These
measures are appropriate for inlets draining
small areas where soil will be disturbed. Some
state or local jurisdictions require installation
of these measures before disturbance of more
than a certain acreage of land begins. Regular
maintenance to remove accumulated sedi-
ment is important for proper operation.
Collection and Sedimentation Basins
A collection or sedimentation basin (see
Figure 6) is an area that retains runoff long
Figure 3. Silt Fence
i Ql fadnc and wr»
Filtv 1pSnc
Bottom: Perspective of silt fence. Top: Cross-
section detail of base of silt fence.
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
Figure 4. Straw Bale
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
enough to allow most of the sediment to set-
tle out and accumulate on the bottom of the
basin. Since many pollutants are attached to
suspended solids, they will also settle out in
the basin with the sediment. The quantity of
sediment removed will depend on basin vol-
ume, inlet and outlet configuration, basin
depth and shape, and retention time. Regular
maintenance and dredging to remove accu-
6-24
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
mulated sediment and to minimize growth of
aquatic plants that can reduce effectiveness is
critical to the operation of basins. All dredged
materials, whether they are disposed or
reused, should be managed appropriately.
Basins can also present a safety hazard.
Fences or other measures to prevent unwant-
ed public access to the basins and their associ-
ated inlet and outlet structures are prudent
safety precautions. In designing collection or
sedimentation basins (a form of surface
impoundment), consider storm- water flow,
sediment and pollutant loadings, and the
characteristics of expected pollutants. In the
case of certain pollutants, it might be appro-
priate to line the basins to protect the ground
water below. Lining a basin with concrete also
facilitates maintenance by allowing dredging
vehicles to drive into a drained basin and
remove accumulated sediment. Poor imple-
mentation of baseline and activity-specific
BMPs can result in high sediment and pollu-
tant loads, leading to unusually frequent
What are some advantages of
sedimentation basins?
They protect downstream areas against
clogging or damage and contain smaller
sediment particles than sediment traps
can due to their longer retention time.
What are some disadvantages?
Sedimentation basins are generally
not suitable for large areas, require regu-
lar maintenance and cleaning, and will
not remove very fine silts and clays
unless used with other measures.
dredging of settled materials. For this reason,
when operating sedimentation basins, it is
important that baseline and activity-specific
BMPs are being implemented properly. We
recommend that construction of these basins
be supervised by a qualified engineer familiar
with state and local storm-water requirements.
Figure 5. Storm Drain Inlet Protection
Efld hitf! PiUlK.1«
Bart jnd GQrtl Ifml =• :I|H-.-I:I:
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
Check Dams
Small rock or log
dams erected across a
ditch, swale, or channel
can reduce the speed of
water flow in the con-
veyance. This reduces
erosion and also allows
sediment to settle out
along the channel. Check
dams are especially use-
ful in steep, fast-flowing
swales where vegetation
cannot be established.
For best results, it is rec-
ommended that you
place check dams along
the swale so that the crest
of each check dam is at
the same elevation as the
toe (lowest point) of the
6-25
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
previous (upstream) check dam. Check dams
work best in conveyances draining small
areas and should be installed only in man-
made conveyances. Placement of check dams
in streams is not recommended and might
require a permit.
Terraces and Benches
Terraces and benches are earthen embank-
ments with flat tops or ridge-and-channels.
Terraces and benches hold moisture and
minimize sediment loading in runoff. They
can be used on land with no vegetation or
where it is anticipated that erosion will be a
problem. Terraces and benches reduce ero-
sion damage by capturing storm-water runoff
and directing it to an area where the runoff
will not cause erosion or damage. For best
results, this area should be a grassy waterway
vegetated area, or tiled outlet. Terraces and
benches might not be appropriate for use on
sandy or rocky slopes.
Figure 6.
Collection and Sedimentation Basin
_-«
t ^l«
^V_,,—__^f=- =\
\. v,-i-•,.J^oT^""1* \
KS'» • ^smp; i \
•,-,•..i -..i
Crcvi Stctfen u1
Outlet Protection
Stone, riprap, pavement, or other stabi-
lized surfaces placed at a storm-water con-
veyance outlet are known as outlet protection
(see Figure 7). Outlet protection reduces the
speed of concentrated storm-water flows exit-
ing the outlet, lessening erosion and scouring
of channels downstream. It also removes sed-
iment by acting as a filter medium. It is rec-
ommended that you consider installing outlet
protection wherever predicted outflow veloci-
ties might cause erosion.
of.
Infiltration
Infiltration measures such as vegetated fil-
ter strips, grassed swales, and infiltration
trenches encourage quick infiltration of
storm water into the ground rather than
allowing it to remain as overland flow.
Infiltration not only reduces runoff velocity
but can also provide some treatment of
runoff, preserve natural stream flow, and
recharge ground water. Infiltration measures
can be inappropriate on unstable slopes or in
cases where runoff might be contaminated,
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
What are some advantages of terraces
and benches?
Terraces and benches reduce runoff
speed and increase the distance of over-
land runoff flow. In addition, they hold
moisture better than do smooth slopes
and minimize sediment loading in runoff.
What are some disadvantages of
terraces and benches?
Terraces and benches can significantly
increase cut and fill costs and cause
sloughing if excess water infiltrates the
soil. They are not practical for sandy,
steep, or shallow soils.
6-26
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
or where wells, foundations, or septic fields
are nearby.
Vegetated Filter Strips and Grassed Swales
Vegetated filter strips are gently sloped
areas of natural or planted vegetation. They
allow water to pass over them in sheetflow
(runoff that flows in a thin, even layer), infil-
trate the soil, and drop sediment. Vegetated
filter strips are appropriate where soils are
well draining and the ground-water table is
deep below the surface. They will not work
effectively on slopes of 15 percent or more
due to high runoff velocity. Strips should be
at least 20 feet wide and 50 to 75 feet long in
general, and longer on steeper slopes. If pos-
sible, it is best to leave existing natural vege-
tation in place as filter strips, rather than
planting new vegetation, which will not func-
tion to capture eroded particles until it
becomes established.
Grassed swales function similarly to non-
vegetated swales (discussed earlier in this
chapter) except that grass planted along the
swale bottom and sides will slow water flow
and filter out sediment. Permeable soil in
which the swale is cut encourages reduction
of water volume through infiltration. Check
dams (discussed earlier in this chapter) are
sometimes provided in grassed swales to fur-
ther slow runoff velocity, increasing the rate
of infiltration.
To optimize swale performance, it is best
to use a soil which is permeable but not
excessively so; very sandy soils will not hold
vegetation well and will not form a stable
channel structure. It is also recommended
that you grade the swale to a very gentle
slope to maximize infiltration.
Infiltration Trenches
An infiltration trench (see Figure 8) is a
long, narrow excavation ranging from 3 to 12
feet deep. It is filled with stone to allow for
temporary storage of storm water in the open
spaces between the stones. The water eventu-
ally infiltrates the surrounding soil or is col-
lected by perforated pipes in the bottom of
the trench and conveyed to an outflow point.
Such trenches can remove fine sediments and
Figure 7. Outlet Protection
Pipe QUW to Well-delrnM
j •••
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
6-27
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
soluble pollutants. They should not be built
in relatively impervious soils, such as clay
that would prevent water from draining from
the bottom of the trench; less than 3 feet
above the water table; in soil that is subject
to deep frost penetration; or at the foot of
slopes steeper than 5 percent. Infiltration
trenches should not be used to handle conta-
minated runoff. Runoff can be pretreated
using a grass buffer/filter strip or treated in
the trench with filter fabric.
e. Other Practices
Additional practices exist that can help
prevent contamination of surface water such
as preventive monitoring, dust control, vehi-
cle washing, and discharge to wetlands.
Many of these practices are simple and inex-
pensive to implement while others, such as
monitoring, can require more resources.
Preventive Monitoring
Preventive monitoring includes automatic
and control systems, monitoring of opera-
tions by waste management unit personnel,
and testing of equipment. These processes
can help to ensure that equipment functions
as designed and is in good repair so that
spills and leaks, which could contaminate
adjacent surface waters, are minimized and
do not go undetected when they do occur.
Some automatic monitoring equipment, such
as pressure gauges coupled with pressure
relief devices, can correct problems without
human intervention, preventing leaks or
spills that could contaminate surface water if
allowed to occur. Other monitoring equip-
ment can provide early warning of problems
so that personnel can intervene before leaks
or spills occur. Systems that could contami-
nate surface water if they failed and that
could benefit from automatic monitoring or
early warning devices include leachate
pumping and treatment systems, liquid waste
Figure 8. Infiltration Trench
From U.S. EPA, 1992e.
distribution and storage systems at land
application units, and contaminated runoff
conveyances.
Dust Control
In addition to being an airborne pollutant,
dust can settle in areas where it can be
picked up by runoff or can be transported by
air and deposited directly into surface waters.
Dust particles can carry pollutants and can
also result in sedimentation of waterbodies.
Several methods of dust control are available
to prevent this. These include irrigation,
chemical treatments, minimization of
exposed soil areas, wind breaks, tillage, and
sweeping. For further information on dust
control, consult Chapter 8-Operating the
Waste Management System.
Vehicle Washing
Materials that accumulate on tires and other
vehicle surfaces and then disperse across a
facility are an important source of surface-
water contamination. Vehicle washing removes
materials such as dust and waste. Washing sta-
tions can be located near waste transfer areas
or near the waste management site exit.
Pressurized water spray is usually sufficient to
remove dust. Waste water from vehicle wash-
ing operations should be contained and han-
6-28
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
died appropriately. Discharge of such waste
water requires an NPDES permit other than
the Multi-Sector General Permit.
Discharges to Wetlands
Discharge to constructed wetlands is a
method less frequently used and can involve
complicated designs. The discharge of storm
water into natural wetlands, or the modifica-
tion of wetlands to improve their treatment
capacity can damage a wetland ecosystem
and, therefore, is subject to federal, state, and
local regulations.
Constructed wetlands provide an alterna-
tive to natural wetlands. A specially designed
pond or basin, which is lined in some cases,
is stocked with wetland plants that can con-
trol sedimentation and manage pollutants
through biological uptake, microbial action,
and other mechanisms. Together, these
processes often result in better pollutant
removal than would be expected from sedi-
mentation alone. When designing construct-
ed wetlands, you should consider 1) that
maintenance might include dredging, similar
to that required for sedimentation basins, 2)
What are some advantages of
constructed wetlands?
Provide aesthetic as well as water qual-
ity benefits and areas for wildlife habitat.
What are some disadvantages of
constructed wetlands?
Discharges to wetlands might be sub-
ject to multiple federal, state, and local
regulations. In addition, constructed
wetlands might not be feasible if land is
not available and might not be effective
as a storm-water control measure until
time has been allowed for substantial
plant growth.
provisions for a dry-weather flow to maintain
the wetlands, 3) measures to limit mosquito
breeding, 4) structures to prevent escape of
floating wetland plants (such as water
hyacinths) into downstream areas where they
are undesirable, and 5) a program of harvest-
ing and replacing plants.
B. Controls to Address
Surface-water
Contamination from
Ground Water to
Surface Water
Generally the use of liners and ground-
water monitoring systems will reduce poten-
tial contamination from ground water to
surface water. For more information on pro-
tecting ground water, refer to Chapter 7:
Sections A-Assessing Risk, Section
B-Designing and Installing Liners, and
Section C-Designing a Land Application
Program.
C. Controls to Address
Surface-water
Contamination from Air
to Surface Water
Emission control techniques for volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and particulates
can assist in reducing potential contamination
of surface water from air. Refer to Chapter
5-Protecting Air Quality, for more informa-
tion on air emission control techniques.
6-29
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
V. Methods of
Calculating
Run-on and
Runoff Rates
The design and operation of surface-water
protection systems will be driven by antici-
pated storm-water flow. Run-on and runoff
flow rates for the chosen design storm event
should be calculated in order to: 1) choose
the proper type of storm-water controls to
install, and 2) properly design the controls
and size the chosen control measures to min-
imize impacts to surface water. Controls
based on too small a design storm event, or
sized without calculating flows will not func-
tion properly and can result in releases of
contaminated storm water. Similarly, systems
can also be designed for too large a flow,
resulting in unnecessary control and exces-
sive costs.
The usual approach for sizing surface-
water protection systems relies on the use of
standardized "design storms." A design storm
is, in theory, representative of many recorded
storms and reflects the intensity, volume, and
duration of a storm predicted to occur once
in a given number of years. In general, sur-
face-water protection structures should be
designed to handle the discharge from a 24-
hour, 25-year storm event (i.e., a rainfall
event of 24 hours duration and of such a
magnitude that it has a 4 percent statistical
likelihood of occurring in any given year).
Figure 9 presents a typical intensity-duration-
frequency curve for rainfall events.
The Hydrometeorological Design Studies
Center (HDSC) at the National Weather
Service has prepared Technical Paper 40,
Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for
Durations From 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and
Return Periods From 1 to 100 Years (published
Rational Method for
Calculating Storm-Water
Runoff Flow
Q = cia
where,
Q = peak flow rate (runoff), expressed in
cubic feet per second (cfs)*
c = runoff coefficient, unitless. The coeffi-
cient c is not directly calculable, so
average values based on experience
are used. Values of c range from 0 (all
infiltration, no runoff) to 1 (all
runoff, no infiltration). For example,
flat lawns with sandy soil have a c
value of 0.05 to 0.10, while concrete
streets have a c value of 0.80 to 0.95.
i = average rainfall intensity, expressed
in inches per hour, for the time of
concentration, tc, which is a calcula-
ble flow time from the most distant
point in the drainage area to the
point at which Q is being calculated.
Once tc is calculated and a design
storm event frequency is selected, i
can be obtained from rainfall inten-
sity-duration-frequency graphs (see
Figure 9).
a = drainage area, expressed in acres.
The drainage area is the expanse in
which all runoff flows to the point
at which Q is being calculated.
* Examining the units of i and a would
indicate that Q should be in units of
ac-in/hr. However, since 1 ac-in/hr =
1.008 cfs, the units are interchangeable
with a negligible loss of accuracy. Units
of cfs are usually desired for subse-
quent calculations.
6-30
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
in 1961). This document contains rainfall
intensity information for the entire United
States. Another HDSC document, NOAA Atlas
2, Precipitation Frequency Atlas of the Western
United States (published in 1973) comes in 11
volumes, one for each of the 11 westernmost
of the contiguous 48 states. Precipitation fre-
quency maps for the eleven western most
states are available on the Western Regional
Climate Center's Web page at .
6-31
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Simulates the movement of precipitation
and pollutants from the ground surface through pipe and channel networks, storage treat-
ment units, and receiving waters.
BASINS: A Powerful Tool for Managing Watersheds. A multi-purpose environmen-
tal analysis system that integrates a geographical information system (GIS), national water-
shed data, and state-of-the-art environmental assessment and modeling tools into one
package.
Source Loading and Management Model (SLAMM). Explores relationships between
sources of urban runoff pollutants and runoff quality. It includes a wide variety of source
area and outfall control practices. SLAMM is strongly based on actual field observations,
with minimal reliance on theoretical processes that have not been adequately documented
or confirmed in the field. SLAMM is mostly used as a planning tool, to better understand
sources of urban runoff pollutants and their control.
Simulation for Water Resources in Rural Basins (SWRRB). Simulates hydrologic,
sedimentation, and nutrient and pesticide transport in large, complex rural watersheds. It
can predict the effect of management decisions on water, sediment, and pesticide yield
with seasonable accuracy for ungauged rural basins throughout the United States.
Pollutant Routing Model (P-ROUTE). Estimates aqueous pollutant concentrations on
a stream reach by stream reach flow basis, using 7Q10 or mean flow.
Enhanced Stream Water Quality Model (QUAL2E). Simulates the major reactions of
nutrient cycles, algal production, benthic and carbonaceous demand, atmospheric reaera-
tion and their effects on the dissolved oxygen balance. It is intended as a water quality
planning tool for developing total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and can also be used in
conjunction with field sampling for identifying the magnitude and quality characteristics
of nonpoint sources.
6-32
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Protecting Surface Water Activity List
You should conduct the following activities when designing or operating surface-water
protection measures or systems in conjunction with waste management units.
Q Comply with applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES),
state, and local permitting requirements.
Q Assess operating practices, identify potential pollutant sources, determine what con-
stituents in the unit pose the greatest threats to surface water, and calculate storm-
water runoff flows to determine the need for and type of storm-water controls.
Q Choose a design storm event (e.g., a 24-hour, 25-year event) and obtain precipita-
tion intensity data for that event to determine the most appropriate storm-water con-
trol devices.
Q Select and implement baseline and activity-specific BMPs, such as good housekeep-
ing practices and spill prevention and response plans as appropriate for your waste
management unit.
Q Select and establish site-specific BMPs, such as diversion dikes, collection and sedi-
mentation basins, and infiltration trenches as appropriate for your waste manage-
ment unit.
Q Develop a plan for inspecting and maintaining the chosen storm-water controls; if
possible, include these measures as part of the operating plan for the waste manage-
ment unit.
6-33
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Resou rces
Dingman, S. 1994. Physical Hydrology. Prentice Hall.
Florida Department ol Environmental Regulation. Storm Water Management: A Guide for Floridians.
Novotny V, and H. Olem. 1994. Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management olDifiuse
Pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Pitt, R. 1988. Source Loading and Management Model: An Urban Nonpoint Source Water Quality Model
(SLAMM). University ol Alabama at Birmingham.
McGhee, T. 1991. McGraw-Hill Series in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. 6th Ed.
Urbonas, B., and P. Stahre. 1993. Storm Water: Best Management Practices and Detention for Water Quality,
Drainage, and CSO Management. PTR Prentice Hall.
U.S. EPA. 1999. Introduction to the National Pretreatment Program. EPA833-B-98-002.
U.S. EPA. 1998. Water Quality Criteria and Standards Plan-Priorities for the Future. EPA822-R-98-003.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Process Design Manual: Land Application ol Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage. EPA625-
R-95-001.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Process Design Manual: Surface Disposal ol Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage. EPA625-
R-95-002.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. NPDES Storm Water Multi-Sector General Permit Information Package.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. Storm Water Discharges Potentially Addressed by Phase II olthe National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Storm Water Program. Report to Congress. EPA833-K-94-002.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Introduction to Water Quality Standards. EPA823-B-95-004.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Project Summary: Potential Groundwater Contamination from Intentional and Non-
Intentional Storm Water Infiltration. EPA600-SR-94-061.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. Storm Water Pollution Abatement Technologies. EPA 600-R-94-129.
6-34
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Protecting Surface Water
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1993a. Overview of the Storm Water Program. EPA833-F-93-001.
U.S. EPA. 1993b. NPDES Storm Water Program: Question and Answer Document, Volume 2. EPA833-
F093-002B.
U.S. EPA. 1992a. An Approach to Improving Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation.
EPA600-R-92-150.
U.S. EPA. 1992b. NPDES Storm Water Program: Question and Answer Document, Volume 1. EPA833-F-
93-002.
U.S. EPA. 1992c. NPDES Storm Water Sampling Guidance Document. EPA833-B-92-001.
U.S. EPA. 1992d. Storm Water General Permits Briefing. EPA833-E-93-001.
U.S. EPA. 1992e. Storm Water Management for Industrial Activities: Developing Pollution Prevention Plans
and Best Management Practices. EPA832-R-92-006.
U.S. EPA. 1992f. Storm Water Management for Industrial Activities: Developing Pollution Prevention Plans
and Best Management Practices. Summary Guidance. EPA833-R-92-002.
Viessman Jr., W, and MJ. Hammer. 1985. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th Ed.
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Planning for Industrial
Facilities: Guidance for Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices. Water
Quality Report. WQ-R-93-015. September.
6-35
-------
-------
Part IV
Protecting Ground-Water Quality
Chapter 7: Section A
Assessing Risk
-------
-------
Contents
I. Assessing Risk 7A-3
A. General Overview of the Risk Assessment Process 7A-3
1. Problem Formulation 7A-3
2. Exposure Assessment 7A-4
3. Toxicity Assessment 7A-5
4. Risk Characterization 7A-5
B. Ground-Water Risk 7A-6
1. Problem Formulation 7A-6
2. Exposure Assessment 7A-7
3. Toxicity Assessment 7A-11
4.Risk Characterization 7A-12
II. The IWEM Ground-Water Risk Evaluation 7A-14
A. The Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model (IWEM) 7A-15
1. Leachate Concentrations 7A-16
2. Models Associated with IWEM 7A-16
3. Important Concepts for Use of IWEM 7A-18
B. Tier 1 Evaluations 7A-22
1. How Are the Tier 1 Lookup Tables Used? 7A-23
2. What Do the Results Mean and How Do I Interpret Them? 7A-25
C. Tier 2 Evaluations 7A-27
1. How is a Tier 2 Analysis Performed? 7A-27
2. What Do the Results Mean and How Do I Interpret Them? 7A-32
D. Strengths and Limitations 7A-34
1. Strengths 7A-34
2. Limitations 7A-34
E. Tier 3: A Comprehensive Site-Specific Evaluation 7A-35
1. How is a Tier 3 Evaluation Performed? 7A-35
Assessing Risk Activity List 7A-40
Resources 7A-41
Tables:
Table 1. Earth's Water Resources 7A-1
Table 2. Examples of Attenuation Processes 7A-10
Table 3. List of Constituents in IWEM with Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) 7A-13
-------
Contents
Table 4. Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfill - No Liner/In situ Soils ..7A-24
Table 5. Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for HBN-based LCTVs for Landfill - No Liner/In situ Soils 7A-25
Table 6. Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfill - Single Clay Liner 7A-25
Table 7. Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfill - Composite Liner 7A-25
Table 8. Input Parameters for Tier 2 7A-29
Table 9. A Sample Set of Site-Specific Data for Input to Tier 2 7A-31
Table 10. Example of Tier 2 Detailed Summary Table - No Liner/In situ Soils 7A-31
Table 11. Example of Tier 2 Detailed Summary Table - Single Clay Liner 7A-32
Table 12. Example Site-Specific Ground-water Fate and Transport Models 7A-38
Table 13. ASTM Ground-Water Modeling Standards 7A-39
Figures:
Figure 1: Representation of Contaminant Plume Movement 7A-5
Figure 2: Three Liner Scenarios Considered in the Tiered Modeling Approach for Industrial
Waste Guidelines 7A-22
Figure 3: Using Tier 1 Lookup Tables 7A-27
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Assessing Risk
This chapter will help you:
• Protect ground water by assessing risks associated with new waste
management units and tailoring management controls accordingly.
• Understand the three-tiered evaluation discussed in this chapter
that can be used to determine whether a liner system is necessary,
and if so, which liner system is recommended, or whether land
application is appropriate.
• Follow guidance on liner design and land application practices.
round water is
the water found
in the soil and
rock that make
up the Earth's
surface. Although it com-
prises only about 0.69 per-
cent of the Earth's water
resources, ground water is of
great importance. It repre-
sents about 25 percent of
fresh water resources, and
when the largely inaccessible
fresh water in ice caps and
glaciers is discounted,
ground water is the Earth's
largest fresh water
resource—easily surpassing
lakes and rivers, as shown in Table 1.
Statistics about the use of ground water as a
drinking water source underscore the impor-
tance of this resource. Ground water is a
source of drinking water for more than half of
the people in the United States.1 In rural
areas, 97 percent of households rely on
ground water as their primary source of
drinking water.
In addition to its importance as a domestic
water supply, ground water is heavily used by
industry and agriculture. It provides approxi-
mately 37 percent of the irrigation water and 18
Table 1.
Earth's Water Resources
Resource Percent of Percent of
Total Nonoceanic
Oceans
Ice caps and glaciers
Ground water and soil moisture
Lakes and rivers
Atmosphere
Biosphere
97.25
2.05
0.685
0.0101
0.001
0.00004
—
74.65
24.94
0.37
0.036
0.0015
Adapted from Berner, E.K. and R. Berner. 1987. The Global
Water Cycle: Geochemistry and Environment
percent of the total water used by industry2
Ground water also has other important environ-
mental functions, such as providing recharge to
lakes, rivers, wetlands, and estuaries.
Water beneath the ground surface occurs in
an upper unsaturated (vadose) zone and a
deeper saturated zone. The unsaturated zone
is the area above the water table where the
soil pores are not filled with water, although
some water might be present. The subsurface
area below the water table where the pores
and cracks are filled with water is called the
saturated zone. This chapter focuses on
1 Surface water, in the form of lakes and rivers, is the other major drinking water source. Speidel, D., L.
Ruedisili, and A. Agnew. 1988. Perspectives on Water: Uses and Abuses.
2 Excludes cooling water for steam-electric power plants. U.S. Geological Survey. 1998. Estimated Use of
Water in the United States in 1995.
7A-1
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
ground water in the saturat-
ed zone, where most
ground-water withdrawals
are made.
Because ground water is a
major source of water for
drinking, irrigation, and
process water, many different
parties are concerned about
ground-water contamination,
including the public; indus-
try; and federal, state, and
local governments. Many
potential threats to the quali-
ty of ground water exist,
such as the leaching of fertil-
izers and pesticides, contam-
ination from faulty or
overloaded septic fields, and
releases from industrial facil-
ities, including waste man-
agement units.
If a source of ground
water becomes contaminat-
ed, remedial action and
monitoring can be costly.
Remediation can require
years of effort, or in some
circumstances, might be
technically infeasible. For
these reasons, preventing
ground-water contamination
is important, or at least min-
imizing impacts to ground
water by implementing con-
trols tailored to the risks
associated with the waste.
This chapter addresses how ground-water
resources can be protected through the use of
a systematic approach of assessing potential
risk to ground water from a proposed waste
management unit (WMU). It discusses assess-
ing risk and the three-tiered ground-water risk
assessment approach implemented in the
Ground Water in the Hydrologic Cyde
The hydrologic cycle involves the continuous movement of
water between the atmosphere, surface water, and the
ground. Ground water must be understood in relation to
both surface water and atmospheric moisture. Most addi-
tions (recharge) to ground water come from the atmosphere
in the form of precipitation, but surface water in streams,
rivers, and lakes will move into the ground-water system
wherever the hydraulic head of the water surface is higher
than the water table. Most water entering the ground as pre-
cipitation returns to the atmosphere by evapotranspiration.
Most water that reaches the saturated zone eventually
returns to the surface by flowing to points of discharge,
such as rivers, lakes, or springs. Soil, geology, and climate
will determine the amounts and rates of flow among the
atmospheric, surface, and ground-water systems.
Industrial Waste Management Evaluation
Model (IWEM), which was developed as part
of this Guide. Additionally, the chapter dis-
cusses the use of this tool and how to apply
its results and recommendations. It is highly
recommended that you also consult with your
state regulatory agency, as appropriate. More
specific information on the issues described in
7A-2
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
this chapter is available in the companion
documents to the IWEM software: User's
Guide for the Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model (U.S. EPA, 2002b), and
Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model
(IWEM) Technical Background Document (U.S.
EPA, 2002a).
I. Assessing Risk
A. General Overview of the
Risk Assessment Process
Our ground-water resources are essential
for biotic life on the planet. They also act as a
medium for the transport of contaminants
and, therefore, constitute an exposure path-
way of concern. Leachate from WMUs can be
a source of ground-water contamination.
Residents who live close to a WMU and who
use wells for water supply can be directly
exposed to waste constituents by drinking or
bathing in contaminated ground water.
Residents also can be exposed by inhaling
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs)
that are released indoors while using ground
water for showering or via soil gas migration
from subsurface plumes.
The purpose of this section is to provide
general information on the risk assessment
process and a specific description of how
each of the areas of risk assessment is applied
in performing ground-water risk analyses.
Greater detail on each of the steps in the
process as they relate to assessing ground-
water risk is provided in later sections of this
chapter.
In any risk assessment, there are basic
steps that are necessary for gathering and
evaluating data. This Guide uses a four-part
process to estimate the likelihood of chemi-
cals coming into contact with people now or
in the future, and the likelihood that such
contact will harm these people. This process
shows how great (or small) the risks might
be. It also points to who is at risk, what is
causing the risk, and how certain one can be
about the risks. A general overview of these
steps is presented below to help explain how
the process is used in performing the assess-
ments associated with IWEM. The compo-
nents of a risk assessment that are discussed
in this section are: problem formulation,
exposure assessment, toxicity assessment, and
risk characterization. Each of these steps is
described as it specifically applies to risk
resulting from the release of chemical con-
stituents from WMUs to ground water.
1.
Problem Formulation
The first step in the risk assessment
process is problem formulation. The purpose
of this step is to clearly define the risk ques-
tion to be answered and identify the objec-
tives, scope, and boundaries of the
assessment. This phase can be viewed as
developing the overall risk assessment study
design for a specific problem. Activities that
might occur during this phase include:
• Articulating a clear understanding of
the purpose and intended use of the
risk assessment.
• Identifying the constituents of concern.
• Identifying potential release scenarios.
• Identifying potential exposure path-
ways.
• Collecting and reviewing available
data.
• Identifying data gaps.
• Recommending data collection
efforts.
• Developing a conceptual model of
what is occurring at the site.
7A-3
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Although this step can be formal or infor-
mal, it is critical to the development of a suc-
cessful assessment that fully addresses the
problem at hand. In addition, the develop-
ment of a conceptual model helps direct the
next phases of the assessment and provides a
clear understanding of the scope and design
of the assessment.
2. Exposure Assessment
The goals of an exposure assessment are
to: 1) characterize the source, 2) characterize
the physical setting of the area that contains
the WMU, 3) identify potential exposure
pathways, 4) understand the fate and trans-
port of constituents of concern, and 5) calcu-
late constituent doses.
Source characterization involves defining
certain key parameters for the WMU. The
accuracy of predicting risks improves as more
site-specific information is used in the char-
acterization. In general, critical aspects of the
source (e.g., type of WMU, size, location,
potential for leachate generation, and expect-
ed constituent concentrations in leachate)
should be obtained. Knowledge of the overall
composition of the waste deposited in the
WMU and of any treatment processes occur-
ring in the WMU is important to determine
the overall characteristics of the leachate that
will be generated.
The second step in evaluating exposure is
to characterize the site with respect to its
physical characteristics, as well as those of
the human populations near the site.
Important site characteristics include climate,
meteorology, geologic setting, and hydrogeol-
ogy. Consultation with appropriate technical
experts (e.g., hydrogeologists, modelers)
might be needed to characterize the site.
Characterizing the populations near the site
with respect to proximity to the site, activity
patterns, and the presence of sensitive sub-
groups might also be appropriate. This group
of data will be useful in determining the
potential for exposure to and intake of con-
stituents.
The next step in this process includes
identifying exposure pathways through
ground water and estimating exposure con-
centrations at the well3. In modeling the
movement of the constituents away from the
WMU, the Guide generally assumes that the
constituents behave as a plume (see Figure
1), and the plume's movement is modeled to
produce estimated concentrations of con-
stituents at points of interest. As shown in
Figure 1, the unsaturated zone receives
leachate from the WMU. In general, the flow
in the unsaturated zone tends to be gravity-
driven, although other factors (e.g., soil
porosity, capillarity, moisture potential) can
also influence downward flow.
Transport through the unsaturated zone
delivers constituents to the saturated zone, or
aquifer. Once the contaminant arrives at the
water table, it will be transported downgradi-
ent toward wells by the predominant flow
field in the saturated zone. The flow field is
governed by a number of hydrogeologic and
climate-driven factors, including regional
hydraulic gradient, hydraulic conductivity of
the saturated zone, saturated zone thickness,
local recharge rate (which might already be
accounted for in the regional hydraulic gradi-
ent), and infiltration rate through the WMU.
The next step in the process is to estimate
the exposure concentrations at a well. Many
processes can occur in the unsaturated zone
and in the saturated zone that can influence
the concentrations of constituents in leachate
in a downgradient well. These processes
include dilution and attenuation, partitioning
to solid, hydrolysis, and degradation.
Typically, these factors should be considered
when estimating the expected constituent
concentrations at a receptor.
7A-4
In this discussion and in IWEM, the term "well" is used to represent an actual or hypothetical ground-
water monitoring well or drinking water well, located downgradient from a WMU.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Figure 1: Representation of Contaminant Plume Movement
Waste Management Unit
Well
Land Surface
The final step in this process is estimating
the dose. The dose is determined based on
the concentration of a constituent in a medi-
um and the intake rate of that medium for
the receptor. For example, the dose is depen-
dent on the concentration of a constituent in
a well and the ingestion rate of ground water
from that well by the receptor. The intake
rate is dependent on many behavior patterns,
including ingestion rate, exposure duration,
and exposure frequency. In addition, a risk
assessor should consider the various routes of
exposure (e.g., ingestion, inhalation) to deter-
mine a dose.
After all of this information has been col-
lected, the exposure pathways at the site can
be characterized by identifying the potentially
exposed populations, exposure media, expo-
sure points, and relevant exposure routes and
then calculating potential doses.
3. Toxicity Assessment
The purpose of a toxicity assessment is to
weigh available evidence regarding the poten-
tial for constituents to cause adverse effects in
exposed individuals. It is also meant to pro-
vide, where possible, an estimate of the rela-
tionship between the extent of exposure to a
constituent and the increased likelihood
and/or severity of adverse effects. The intent
is to establish a dose-response relationship
between a constituent concentration and the
incidence of an adverse effect. It is usually a
five-step process that includes: 1) gathering
toxicity information for the substances being
evaluated, 2) identifying the exposure periods
for which toxicity values are necessary, 3)
determining the toxicity values for noncar-
cinogenic effects, 4) determining the toxicity
values for carcinogenic effects, and 5) sum-
marizing the toxicity information. The deriva-
tion and interpretation of toxicity values
requires toxicological expertise and should
not be undertaken by those without training
and experience. It is recommended that you
contact your state regulatory agency for more
specific guidance.
4. Risk Characterization
This step involves summarizing and inte-
grating the toxicity and exposure assessments
7A-5
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
and developing qualitative and quantitative
expressions of risk. To characterize noncar-
cinogenic effects, comparisons are made
between projected intakes of substances and
toxicity values to predict the likelihood that
exposure would result in a non-cancer health
problem, such as neurological effects. To char-
acterize potential carcinogenic effects, the
probability that an individual will develop
cancer over a lifetime of exposure is estimated
from projected intake and chemical-specific
dose-response information. The dose of a par-
ticular contaminant to which an individual
was exposed—determined during the expo-
sure assessment phase—is combined with the
toxicity value to generate a risk estimate.
Major assumptions, scientific judgements,
and, to the extent possible, estimates of the
uncertainties embodied in the assessment are
also presented. Risk characterization is a key
step in the ultimate decision-making process.
B. Ground-Water Risk
The previous section provided an overview
of risk assessment; this section provides more
detailed information on conducting a risk
assessment specific to ground water. In partic-
ular, this section characterizes the phases of a
risk assessment—problem formulation, expo-
sure assessment, toxicity assessment, and risk
characterization—in the context of a ground-
water risk assessment.
a.
Waste Characterization
1.
Problem Formulation
The intent of the problem formulation
phase is to define the risk question to be
answered. For ground-water risk assessments,
the question often relates to whether releases
of constituents to the ground water are pro-
tective of human health, surface water, or
ground-water resources. This section discuss-
es characterizing the waste and developing a
conceptual model of a site.
A critical component in a ground-water
risk assessment is the characterization of the
leachate released from a WMU. Leachate is
the liquid formed when rain or other water
comes into contact with waste. The character-
istics of the leachate are a function of the
composition of the waste and other factors
(e.g., volume of infiltration, exposure to dif-
fering redox conditions, management of the
WMU). Waste characterization includes both
identification of the potential constituents in
the leachate and understanding the physical
and chemical properties of the waste.
Identification of the potential constituents
in leachate requires a thorough understanding
of the waste that will be placed in a WMU.
Potential constituents include those used in
typical facility processes, as well as degrada-
tion products from these constituents. For
ground-water risk analyses, it is important to
not only identify the potential constituents of
concern in the leachate, but also the likely
concentration of these constituents in leachate.
To assist in the identification of constituents
present in leachate, EPA has developed several
leachate tests including the Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), the
Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure
(SPLP), and the Multiple Extraction Procedure
(MEP). These and other tests that can be used
to characterize leachate are discussed more
fully in Chapter 2—Characterizing Waste and
are described in EPAs SW-846 Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Wastes (U.S. EPA, 1996 and as
updated).
In addition to identifying the constituents
present, waste characterization includes
understanding the physical, biological, and
chemical properties of the waste. The physical
and chemical properties of the waste stream
affect the likelihood and rate that constituents
will move through the WMU. For example,
the waste properties influence the partitioning
7A-6
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
of constituents among the aqueous, vapor,
and solid phases. Temperature, pH, pressure,
chemical composition,4 and the presence of
microorganisms within WMUs may have sig-
nificant effects on the concentration of con-
stituents available for release in the leachate.
Another waste characteristic that can influ-
ence leachate production is the presence of
organic wastes as free liquids, also called
non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). The
presence of NAPLs may affect the mobility of
constituents based on saturation and viscosi-
ty. Finally, characteristics such as acidity and
alkalinity can influence leachate generation
by affecting the permeability of underlying
soil or clay.
b. Development of a Conceptual
Model
The development of a conceptual model is
important for defining what is needed for the
exposure assessment and the toxicity assess-
ment. The conceptual model identifies the
major routes of exposure to be evaluated and
presents the current understanding of the
toxicity of the constituents of concern.
For the ground-water pathway, the concep-
tual model identifies those pathways on
which the risk assessor should focus.
Potential pathways of interest include ground
water used as drinking water, ground water
used for other domestic purposes that might
release volatile organics, ground-water releas-
es to surface water, vapor intrusion from
ground-water gases to indoor air, and ground
water used as irrigation water. The conceptu-
al model should address the likelihood of
various ground-water pathways under present
or future circumstances, provide insight to
the likelihood of contact with receptors
through the various pathways, and identify
areas requiring further information.
The conceptual model should also address
the toxicity of the constituents of concern.
Information about constituent toxicity can be
collected from publicly available resources
such as the Integrated Risk Information
System (IRIS) or from
detailed, chemical-specific literature searches.
The conceptual model should attempt to
identify the toxicity data that are most rele-
vant to likely routes of ground-water expo-
sure and identify areas requiring additional
research. The conceptual model should pro-
vide a draft plan of action for the next phases
of the risk assessment.
2. Exposure Assessment
Exposure assessment is generally com-
prised of two components: characterization of
the exposure setting and identification of the
exposure pathways. Characterization of the
exposure setting includes describing the
source characteristics and the site characteris-
tics. Identification of the exposure pathway
involves understanding the process by which
a constituent is released from a source, travels
to a receptor, and is taken up by the receptor.
This section discusses the concepts of charac-
terizing the source, characterizing the site set-
ting, understanding the general dynamics of
contaminant fate and transport (or movement
of harmful chemicals to a receptor), identify-
ing exposure pathways, and calculating the
dose to (or uptake by) a receptor.
a.
Source Characterization
The characteristics of a source greatly
influence the release of leachate to ground
water. Some factors to consider include the
type of WMU, the size of the unit, and the
design and management of the unit. The type
of WMU is important because each unit has
distinct characteristics that affect release.
Landfills, for example, tend to be permanent
in nature, which provides a long time period
for leachate generation. Waste piles, on the
other hand, are temporary in design and
Generally, the model considers a high ratio of solids to leachate, and therefore, the user should consider
this before applying a 20 to 1 solids to leachate ratio.
7A-7
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
allow the user to remove the source of conta-
minated leachate at a future date. Surface
impoundments, which are generally managed
with standing water, provide a constant
source of liquid for leachate generation and
potentially result in greater volumes of
leachate.
The size of the unit is important because
units with larger areas have the potential to
generate greater volumes of contaminated
leachate than units with smaller areas. Also,
units such as landfills that are designed with a
greater depth below the ground's surface can
result in decreased travel time from the bot-
tom of the unit to the water table, resulting in
less sorption of constituents. In some cases, a
unit might be hydraulically connected with
the water table resulting in no attenuation in
the unsaturated zone.
The design of the unit is important because
it might include an engineered liner system
that can reduce the amount of infiltration
through the WMU, or a cover that can reduce
the amount of water entering the WMU.
Typical designs might include compacted clay
liners or geosynthetic liners. For surface
impoundments, sludge layers from compacted
sediments might also help reduce the amount
of leachate released. The compacted sedi-
ments can have a lower hydraulic conductivi-
ty than the natural soils resulting in slower
movement of leachate from the bottom of the
unit. Covers also affect the rate of leachate
generation by limiting the amount of liquid
that reaches the waste, thereby limiting the
amount of liquid available to form leachate.
Co-disposal of different wastes can result in
increased or decreased rates of leachate gener-
ation. Generally, WMUs with appropriate
design specifications can result in reduced
leachate generation.
b.
Site Characterization
Site characterization addresses the physical
characteristics of the site as well as the popu-
lations at or near the site. Important physical
characteristics include the climate, geology,
hydrology, and hydrogeology These physical
characteristics help define the likelihood that
water might enter the unit and the likelihood
that leachate might travel from the bottom of
the unit to the ground water. For example,
areas of high rainfall are more likely to gener-
ate leachate than arid regions. The geology of
the site also can affect the rate of infiltration
through the unsaturated zone. For example,
areas with fractured bedrock can allow
leachate through more quickly than a packed
clay material with a low hydraulic conductivi-
ty. Hydrology should also be considered
because ground water typically discharges to
surface water. The presence of surface waters
can restrict flow to wells or might require
analysis of the impact of contaminated ground
water on receptors present in the surface
water. Finally, factors related to the hydrogeol-
ogy, such as the depth to the water table, also
influence the rate at which leachate reaches
the water table.
The characterization of the site also includes
identifying and characterizing populations at
or near the site. When characterizing popula-
tions, it is important to identify the relative
location of the populations to the site. For
example, it is important to determine whether
receptors are downgradient from the unit and
the likely distance from the unit to wells. It is
also important to determine typical activity
patterns, such as whether ground water is
used for drinking water or agricultural purpos-
es. The presence of potential receptors is criti-
cal for determining a complete exposure
pathway. People might not live there now, but
they might live there in 50 years, based on
future use assumptions. State or local agencies
have relevant information to help you identify
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
areas that are designated as potential sources
of underground drinking water.
c. Understanding Fate and Transport
In general, the flow in the unsaturated zone
tends to be gravity-driven. As shown in Figure
1, the unsaturated zone receives leachate infil-
tration from the WMU. Therefore, the vertical
flow component accounts for most of the fluid
flux between the base of the WMU and the
water table. Water-borne constituents are car-
ried vertically downward toward the water
table by the advection process. Mixing and
spreading occur as a result of hydrodynamic
dispersion and diffusion. Transport processes
in the saturated zone include advection,
hydrodynamic dispersion, and sorption.
Advection is the process by which con-
stituents are transported by the motion of the
flowing ground water. Hydrodynamic disper-
sion is the tendency for some constituents to
spread out from the path that they would be
expected to flow. Sorption is the process by
which leachate molecules adhere to the sur-
face of individual clay, soil, or sediment parti-
cles. Attenuation of some chemicals in the
unsaturated zone is attributable to various
biochemical or physicochemical processes,
such as degradation and sorption.
The type of geological material below the
unit affects the rate of movement because of
differences in hydraulic and transport proper-
ties. One of the key parameters controlling
contaminant migration rates is hydraulic con-
ductivity. The larger the hydraulic conductivi-
ty, the greater the potential migration rate due
to lower hydraulic resistance of the formation.
Hydraulic conductivity values of some hydro-
geologic environments, such as bedded sedi-
mentary rock aquifers, might not be as large
as those of other hydrogeologic environments,
such as sand and gravel or fractured lime-
stone. As a general principle, more rapid
movement of waste constituents can be
expected through coarse-textured materials,
such as sand and gravel, than through fine-
textured materials, such as silt and clay. Other
key flow and transport parameters include
dispersivity (which determines how far a
plume will spread horizontally and vertically
as it moves away from the source) and porosi-
ty (which determines the amount of pore
space in the geologic materials in the unsatu-
rated and saturated zone used for flow and
transport and can affect transport velocity).
As waste constituents migrate through the
unsaturated and saturated zones, they can
undergo a number of biochemical and
physicochemical processes that can lead to a
reduction in concentration of potential
ground-water contaminants. These processes
are collectively referred to as attenuation
processes. Attenuation processes can remove
or degrade waste constituents through filtra-
tion, sorption, precipitation, hydrolysis, bio-
logical degradation, bio-uptake, and redox
reactions. Some of these processes (e.g.,
hydrolysis, biological degradation) can actual-
ly result in the formation of different chemi-
cals and greater toxicity Attenuation
processes are dependent upon several factors,
including ground-water pH, ground-water
temperature, and the presence of other com-
pounds in the subsurface environment. Table
2 provides additional information on attenua-
tion processes.
d. Exposure Pathways
A complete exposure pathway usually con-
sists of four elements: 1) a source and mecha-
nism of chemical release, 2) a retention or
transport medium (in this case, ground
water), 3) a point of potential human contact
with the contaminated medium (often referred
to as the exposure point), and 4) an exposure
route (e.g., ingestion). Residents who live near
7A-9
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 2:
Examples of Attenuation Processes
Biological degradation: Decomposition of a substance into more elementary compounds by action
of microorganisms such as bacteria. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed.
Government Institutes.
Bio-uptake: The uptake and (at least temporary) storage of a chemical by an exposed organism. The
chemical can be retained in its original form and/or modified by enzymatic and non-enzymatic reac-
tions in the body. Typically, the concentrations of the substance in the organism exceed the concentra-
tions in the environment since the organism will store the substance and not excrete it. Sullivan. 1993.
Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed. Government Institutes.
Filtration: Physical process whereby solid particles and large dissolved molecules suspended in a
fluid are entrapped or removed by the pore spaces of the soil and aquifer media. Boulding, R. 1995.
Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation.
Hydrolysis: A chemical process of decomposition in which the elements of water react with another
substance to yield one or more entirely new substances. This transformation process changes the chem-
ical structure of the substance. Sullivan. 1993. Environmental Regulatory Glossary, 6th Ed. Government
Institutes.
Oxidation/Reduction (Redox) reactions: Involve a transfer of electrons and, therefore, a change in
the oxidation state of elements. The chemical properties for elements can change substantially with
changes in the oxidation state. U.S. EPA. 1991. Site Characterization for Subsurface Remediation.
Precipitation: Chemical or physical change whereby a contaminant moves from a dissolved form in
a solution to a solid or insoluble form. It reduces the mobility of constituents, such as metals. Unlike
sorption, precipitation is not generally reversible. Boulding, R. 1995. Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-
Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation.
Sorption: The ability of a chemical to partition between the liquid and solid phase by determining
its affinity for adhering to other solids in the system such as soils or sediments. The amount of chemi-
cal that "sorbs" to solids is dependent upon the characteristics of the chemical, the characteristics of the
surrounding soils and sediments, and the quantity of the chemical. Sorption generally is reversible.
Sorption often includes both adsorption and ion exchange.
a site might use ground water for their water
suppfy, and thus, the exposure point woufd be
a well. Exposure routes typical of residential
use of contaminated ground water include
direct ingestion through drinking water, der-
mal contact while bathing, and inhalation of
VOCs during showering or from other house-
hold water uses (e.g., dishwashers).
Another potential pathway of concern is
exposure to ground-water constituents from
the intrusion of vapors of VOCs and SVOCs
through the basements and concrete slabs
beneath houses. This pathway is character-
ized by the vapors seeping into households
through the cracks and holes in basements
and concrete slabs. In some cases, concentra-
tions of constituents can reach levels that pre-
sent chronic health hazards. Factors that can
contribute to the potential for vapor intrusion
include the types of constituents present in
the ground water, the presence of pavement
or frozen surface soils (which result in higher
subsurface pressure gradients and greater
transport), and the presence of subsurface
7A-10
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
gases such as methane that affect the rate of
transport of other constituents. Because of the
complexity of this pathway and the evolving
science regarding this pathway IWEM focuses
on the risks and pathways associated with
residential exposures to contaminated ground
water. If exposure through this route is likely
the user might consider Tier 3 modeling to
assess this pathway. EPA is planning to issue a
reference document regarding the vapor
intrusion pathway in the near future.
e.
Dose Calculation
The final element of the exposure assess-
ment is the dose calculation. The dose to a
receptor is a function of the concentration at
the exposure point (i.e, the well) and the
intake rate by the receptor. The concentration
at the exposure point is based on the release
from the source and the fate and transport of
the constituent. The intake rate is dependent
on the exposure route, the frequency of expo-
sure, and the duration of exposure.
EPA produced the Exposure Factors
Handbook (U.S. EPA, 1997a) as a reference for
providing a consistent set of exposure factors
to calculate the dose. This reference is avail-
able from EPAs National Center for
Environmental Assessment Web site
. The purpose of the
handbook is to summarize data on human
behaviors and physical characteristics (e.g.,
body weight) that affect exposure to environ-
mental contaminants and recommend values
to use for these factors. The result of a dose
calculation is expressed as a contaminant con-
centration per unit body weight per unit time
that can then be used as the output of the
exposure assessment for the risk characteriza-
tion phase of the analysis.
3. Toxicity Assessment
A toxicity assessment weighs available evi-
dence regarding the potential for particular
contaminants to cause adverse effects in
exposed individuals, and where possible, pro-
vides an estimate of the increased likelihood
and severity of adverse effects as a result of
exposure to a contaminant. IWEM uses two
different toxicity measures—maximum conta-
minant levels (MCLs) and health-based num-
bers (HBNs). Each of these measures is based
on toxicity values reflecting a cancer or non-
cancer effect. Toxicity data are based on
human epidemiologic data, animal data, or
other supporting studies (e.g., laboratory
studies). In general, data can be used to char-
acterize the potential adverse effect of a con-
stituent as either carcinogenic or
non-carcinogenic. For the carcinogenic effect,
EPA generally assumes there is a non-thresh-
old effect and estimates a risk per unit dose.
For the noncarcinogenic effect, EPA generally
assumes there is a threshold below which no
adverse effects occur. The toxicity values used
in IWEM include:
• Oral cancer slope factors (CSFo) for
oral exposure to carcinogenic conta-
minants.
• Reference doses (RfD) for oral expo-
sure to contaminants that cause non-
cancer health effects.
• Inhalation cancer slope factors (CSFi)
derived from Unit Risk Factors
(URFs) for inhalation exposure to car-
cinogenic contaminants.
• Reference concentrations (RfC) for
inhalation exposure to contaminants
that cause noncancer health effects.
EPA defines the cancer slope factor (CSF)
as, "an upper bound, approximating a 95 per-
cent confidence limit, on the increased cancer
risk from a lifetime exposure to an agent [con-
taminant]." Because the CSF is an upper
bound estimate of increased risk, EPA is rea-
sonably confident that the "true risk" will not
exceed the risk estimate derived using the CSF
and that the "true risk" is likely to be less than
7A-11
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
predicted. CSFs are expressed in units of pro-
portion (of a population) affected per mil-
ligram/kilogram-day (mg/kg-day). For
noncancer health effects, the RfD and the RfC
are used as health benchmarks for ingestion
and inhalation exposures, respectively. RfDs
and RfCs are estimates of daily oral exposure
or of continuous inhalation exposure, respec-
tively, that are likely to be without an appre-
ciable risk of adverse effects in the general
population, including sensitive individuals,
over a lifetime. The methodology used to
develop RfDs and RfCs is expected to have an
uncertainty spanning an order of magnitude.
a. Maximum Contaminant Levels
(MCLs)
MCLs are maximum permissible contami-
nant concentrations allowed in public drink-
ing water and are established under the Safe
Drinking Water Act. For each constituent to
be regulated, EPA first sets a Maximum
Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) as a level
that protects against health risks. The MCL
for each contaminant is then set as close to
its MCLG as possible. In developing MCLs,
EPA considers not only the health effects of
the constituents, but also additional factors,
such as the cost of treatment, available ana-
lytical and treatment technologies. Table 3
lists the 57 constituents that have MCLs that
are incorporated in IWEM.
b. Health-based Numbers (HBNs).
The parameters that describe a chemical's
toxicity and a receptor's exposure to the chem-
ical are considered in calculation of the
HBN(s) of that chemical. HBNs are the maxi-
mum contaminant concentrations in ground
water that are not expected to cause adverse
noncancer health effects in the general popula-
tion (including sensitive subgroups) or that
will not result in an additional incidence of
cancer in more than approximately one in one
million individuals exposed to the contami-
nant. Lower concentrations of the contami-
nant are not likely to cause adverse health
effects. Exceptions might occur, however, in
individuals exposed to multiple contaminants
that produce the same health effect. Similarly,
a higher incidence of cancer among sensitive
subgroups, highly exposed subpopulations, or
populations exposed to more than one cancer-
causing contaminant might be expected. As
noted previously, the exposure factors used to
calculate HBNs are described in the Exposure
Factors Handbook (U.S. EPA, 1997a).
4.
Risk Characterization
Risk characterization is the integration of
the exposure assessment and the toxicity
assessment to generate qualitative and quan-
titative expressions of risk. For carcinogens,
the target risk level used in IWEM to calcu-
late the HBNs is 1 x lO6. A risk of 1 x lO6
describes an increased chance of one in a
million of a person developing cancer over a
lifetime, due to chronic exposure to a specific
chemical. The target hazard quotient used to
calculate the HBNs for noncarcinogens is 1.
A hazard quotient of 1 indicates that the esti-
mated dose is equal to the RfD (the level
below which no adverse effect is expected).
An HQ of 1, therefore, is frequently EPA's
threshold of concern for noncancer effects.
These targets are used to calculate unique
HBNs for each constituent of concern and
each exposure route of concern (i.e., inges-
tion or inhalation).
Usually, doses less than the RfD (HQ = 1)
are not likely to be associated with adverse
health effects and, therefore, are less likely to
be of regulatory concern. As the frequency or
magnitude of the exposures exceeding the
RfD increase (HQ > 1), the probability of
adverse effects in a human population
increases. However, it should not be categori-
cally concluded that all doses below the RfD
7A-12
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 3.
List of Constituents in IWEM with Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
(States can have more stringent standards than federal MCLs.)
Organics with an MCL
Benzene 0.005
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0002
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.006
Bromodichloromethane* 0.10
Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol,2-sec-(Dinoseb) 0.007
Carbon tetrachloride 0.005
Chlordane 0.002
Chlorobenzene 0.1
Chlorodibromomethane* 0.10
Chloroform* 0.10
Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2-(DBCP) 0.0002
Dichlorobenzene 1,2- 0.6
Di chlorobenzene 1,4- 0.075
Dichloroethane 1,2- 0.005
Dichloroethylene cis-1,2- 0.07
Dichloroethylene trans-1,2- 0.1
Dichloroethylene l,l-(Vinylidene chloride) 0.007
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4- (2,4-D) 0.07
Dichloropropane 1,2- 0.005
Endrin 0.002
Ethylbenzene 0.7
Ethylene dibromide (1,2- Dibromoethane) 0.00005
Inorganics with an MCL
HCH (Lindane) gamma- 0.0002
Heptachlor 0.0004
Heptachlor epoxide 0.0002
Hexachlorobenzene 0.001
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05
Methoxychlor 0.04
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 0.005
Pentachloro phenol 0.001
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.0005
Styrene 0.1
TCD Dioxin 2,3,7,8- 0.00000003
Tetrachloroethylene 0.005
Toluene 1
Toxaphene (chlorinated camphenes) 0.003
Tribromomethane (Bromoform)* 0.10
Trichlorobenzene 1,2,4- 0.07
Trichloroethane 1,1,1- 0.2
Trichloroethane 1,1,2- 0.005
Tri chloro ethyl en e (1,1,2- Trichloroethylene) 0.005
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.05
Vinyl chloride 0.002
Xylenes 10
Antimony
Arsenic**
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
(total used for Cr III and Cr VI)
0.006
0.05
2.0
0.004
0.005
0.1
Copper***
Fluoride
Lead***
Mercury (inorganic)
Selenium
Thallium
1.3
4.0
0.015
0.002
0.05
0.002
For list of current MCLs, visit:
* Listed as Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs), constituents do not have individually listed MCLs
** Arsenic standard will be lowered to 0.01 mg/L by 2006.
*** Value is drinking water "action level" as specified by 40 CFR 141.32(e) (13) and (14).
7A-13
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
are "acceptable" (or will be risk-free) and that
all doses in excess of the RfD are "unaccept-
able" (or will result in adverse effects). For
IWEM, the output from the risk characteriza-
tion helps determine with 90 percent proba-
bility (i.e., with a confidence that for 90
percent of the realizations) whether or not a
design system is protective (i.e., has a cancer
risk of < 1 x 10~6, non-cancer hazard quotient
of < 1.0). IWEM does not address the cumu-
lative risk due to simultaneous exposure to
multiple constituents. The results of the risk
assessment might encourage the user to con-
duct a more site-specific analysis, or consider
opportunities for waste minimization or pol-
lution prevention.
II. The IWEM
Ground-Water
Risk Evaluation
This section takes the principles of risk
assessment described in Part I and applies
them to evaluating industrial waste manage-
ment unit liner designs. This is accomplished
using IWEM and a three-tiered ground-water
modeling approach to make recommenda-
tions regarding the liner design systems that
should be considered for a potential unit, if a
liner design system is considered necessary.
The tiered approach was chosen to provide
facility managers, the public, and state regu-
lators flexibility in assessing the appropriate-
ness of particular WMU designs as the user
moves from a national assessment to an
assessment using site-specific parameters.
The three tiers allow for three possible
approaches. The first approach is a quick
screening tool, a set of lookup tables, which
provides conservative national criteria. While
this approach, labeled Tier 1, does not take
into account site- (or even state-) specific con-
ditions, it does provide a rapid and easy
screening. If the use of Tier 1 provides an
agreeable assessment, the conservative nature
of the model can be relied upon, and the
additional resources required for further
analysis can be avoided. Of course, where
there is concern with the results from Tier 1,
a more precise assessment of risk at the
planned unit location should be conducted.
The second approach is to try and accommo-
date many of the most important site-specific
factors in a simplified form, useable by indus-
try, state, and environmental representatives.
This model, labeled Tier 2, is available as part
of this Guide, and is a major new step in
moving EPA guidance away from national,
"one size fits all" approaches. Third, a site-
specific risk analysis can be conducted. This
approach should provide the most precise
assessment of the risks posed by the planned
unit. Such an analysis, labeled Tier 3, should
be conducted by experts in ground-water
modeling, and can require significant
resources. This Guide identifies the benefits
and sources for selecting site-specific models,
but does not provide such models as part of
this Guide. In many cases, corporations will
go directly to conducting the more exacting
Tier 3 analysis, which EPA believes is accept-
able under the Guide. There is, however, still
a need for the Tier 2 tool. State and environ-
mental representatives might have limited
resources to conduct or examine a Tier 3
assessment; Tier 2 can provide a point of
comparison with the results of the Tier 3
analysis, narrow the technical discussion to
those factors which are different in the mod-
els, and form a basis for a more informed dia-
logue on the reasonableness of the differences.
IWEM is designed to address Tier 1 and
Tier 2 evaluations. Both tiers of the tool con-
sider all portions of the risk assessment
process (i.e., problem formulation, exposure
assessment, toxicity assessment, and risk
characterization) to generate results that vary
from a national-level screening evaluation to
7A-14
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
a site-specific assessment. The Tier 3 evalua-
tion is a complex, site-specific hydrogeologic
investigation that would be performed with
other models such as those listed at the end
of this chapter. Those models could be used
to evaluate hydrogeological complexities that
are not addressed by IWEM. Brief outlines of
the three tiers follow.
A Tier 1 evaluation involves comparing the
expected leachate concentrations of wastes
being assessed against a set of pre-calculated
maximum recommended leachate concentra-
tions (or Leachate Concentration Threshold
Values—LCTVs). The Tier 1 LCTVs are
nationwide, ground-water fate and transport
modeling results from EPA's Composite Model
for Leachate Migration with Transformation
Products (EPACMTP). EPACMTP simulates
the fate and transport of leachate infiltrating
from the bottom of a WMU and predicts con-
centrations of those contaminants in a well. In
making these predictions, the model quantita-
tively accounts for many complex processes
that dilute and attenuate the concentrations of
waste constituents as they move through the
subsurface to the well. The results that are
generated show whether a liner system is con-
sidered necessary, and if so which liner sys-
tems will be protective for the constituents of
concern. Tier 1 results are designed to be pro-
tective with 90 percent certainty at a IxlO6
risk level for carcinogens or a noncancer haz-
ard quotient of < 1.0.
The Tier 2 evaluation incorporates a limit-
ed number of site-specific parameters to help
provide recommendations about which liner
system (if any is considered necessary) is pro-
tective for constituents of concern in settings
that are more reflective of your site. IWEM is
designed to facilitate site-specific simulations
without requiring the user to have any previ-
ous ground-water modeling experience. As
with any ground-water risk evaluation, how-
ever, the user is advised to discuss the results
of the Tier 2 evaluation with the appropriate
state regulatory agency before selecting a liner
design for a new WMU.
If the Tier 1 and Tier 2 modeling do not
adequately simulate conditions at a proposed
site because the hydrogeology of the site is
complex, or because the user believes Tier 2
does not adequately address a particular site-
specific parameter, the user is advised to con-
sider a more in-depth, site-specific risk
assessment. This Tier 3 assessment involves a
more detailed, site-specific ground-water fate
and transport analysis. The user should con-
sult with state officials and appropriate trade
associations to solicit recommendations for
approaches for the analysis.
The remainder of this section discusses in
greater detail how to use IWEM to perform a
Tier 1 or Tier 2 evaluation. In addition, this
section presents information concerning the
use of Tier 3 models.
A. The Industrial Waste
Management Evaluation
Model (IWEM)
The IWEM is the ground-water modeling
component of the Guide for Industrial Waste
Management, used for recommending appro-
priate liner system designs, where they are
considered necessary, for the management of
RCRA Subtitle D industrial waste. IWEM
compares the expected leachate concentration
(entered by the user) for each waste con-
stituent with a protective level calculated by a
ground-water fate and transport model to
determine whether a liner system is needed.
When IWEM determines a liner system is
necessary, it then evaluates two standard liner
types (i.e., single clay-liner and composite
liner). This section discusses components of
the tool and important concepts whose under-
standing is necessary for its effective use. The
user can refer to the User's Guide for the
7A-15
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model
(U.S. EPA, 2002b) for information necessary
to perform Tier 1 and Tier 2 analyses, and the
Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model
Technical Background Document (U.S. EPA,
2002a), for more information on the use and
development of IWEM.
1. Leachate Concentrations
The first step in determining a protective
waste management unit design is to identify
the expected constituents in the waste and
expected leachate concentrations from the
waste. In order to assess ground-water risks
using either the Tier 1 or Tier 2 evaluations
provided in IWEM, the expected leachate
concentration for each individual constituent
of interest must be entered into the model.
See Chapter 2—Characterizing Wastes, for a
detailed discussion of the various approaches
available to use in evaluating expected
leachate concentrations.
2. Models Associated with IWEM
One of the highlights of IWEM is its abili-
ty to simulate the fate and transport of waste
constituents at a WMU with a small number
of site-specific inputs. To accomplish this
task, IWEM incorporates the outputs of three
other models, specifically EPACMTP, MINTE-
QA2, and HELP. This section discusses these
three models.
a. EPACMTP
EPAs Composite Model for Leachate
Migration with Transformation Products
(EPACMTP) is the backbone of IWEM.
EPACMTP is designed to simulate subsurface
fate and transport of contaminants leaching
from the bottom of a WMU and predict con-
centrations of those contaminants in a down-
gradient well. In making these predictions,
the model accounts for many complex
processes that occur as waste constituents
and their transformation products move to
and through ground water. As leachate carry-
ing waste constituents migrates through the
unsaturated zone to the water table, attenua-
tion processes, such as adsorption and degra-
dation, reduce constituent concentrations.
Ground-water transport in the saturated zone
further reduces leachate concentrations
through dilution and attenuation. The con-
centration of constituents arriving at a well,
therefore, is lower than that in the leachate
released from a WMU.
In the unsaturated zone, the model simu-
lates one-dimensional vertical migration with
steady infiltration of constituents from the
WMU. In the saturated zone, EPACMTP sim-
ulates three-dimensional plume-movement
(i.e., horizontal as well as transverse and ver-
tical spreading of a contaminant plume). The
model considers not only the subsurface fate
and transport of constituents, but also the
formation and the fate and transport of trans-
formation (daughter and granddaughter)
products. The model also can simulate the
fate and transport of metals, taking into
account geochemical influences on the
mobility of metals.
b.
MINTEQA2
In the subsurface, metal contaminants can
undergo reactions with other substances in
the ground water and with the solid aquifer
or soil matrix material. Reactions in which
the metal is bound to the solid matrix are
referred to as sorption reactions, and the
metal bound to the solid is said to be sorbed.
During contaminant transport, sorption to
the solid matrix results in retardation (slower
movement) of the contaminant front.
Transport models such as EPACMTP incorpo-
rate a retardation factor to account for sorp-
tion processes.
7A-16
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
The actual geochemical processes that con-
trol the sorption of metals can be quite com-
plex, and are influenced by factors such as
pH, the type and concentration of the metal
in the leachate plume, the presence and con-
centrations of other constituents in the
leachate plume, and other factors. The
EPACMTP model is not capable of simulating
all these processes in detail. Another model,
MINTEQA25, is used to determine a sorption
coefficient for each of the metals species. For
IWEM, distributions of variables (e.g., leach-
able organic matter, pH) were used to gener-
ate a distribution of isotherms for each metal
species. EPACMTP, in turn, samples from
these calculated sorption coefficients and uses
the selected isotherm as a modeling input to
account for the effects of nationwide or
aquifer-specific ground-water and leachate
geochemistry on the sorption and mobility of
metals constituents.
c.
HELP
The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill
Performance (HELP) model is a quasi-two-
dimensional hydrologic model for computing
water balances of landfills, cover systems, and
other solid waste management facilities. The
primary purpose of the model is to assist in
the comparison of design alternatives. HELP
uses weather, soil, and design data to com-
pute a water balance for landfill systems
accounting for the effects of surface storage;
snowmelt; runoff; infiltration; evapotranspira-
tion; vegetative growth; soil moisture storage;
lateral subsurface drainage; leachate recircula-
tion; unsaturated vertical drainage; and leak-
age through soil, geomembrane, or composite
liners. The HELP model can simulate landfill
systems consisting of various combinations of
vegetation, cover soils, waste cells, lateral
drain layers, low permeability barrier soils,
and synthetic geomembrane liners. For fur-
ther information on the HELP model, visit:
.
For the application of HELP to IWEM, an
existing database of infiltration and recharge
rates was used for 97 climate stations in the
lower 48 contiguous states. Five climate sta-
tions (located in Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto
Rico) were added to ensure coverage
throughout all of the United States. These cli-
matic data were then used along with data on
the soil type and WMU design characteristics,
to calculate a water balance for each applica-
ble liner design as a function of the amount
of precipitation that reaches the surface of the
unit, minus the amount of runoff and evapo-
transpiration. The HELP model then comput-
ed the net amount of water that infiltrates
through the surface of the unit (accounting
for recharge), the waste, and the unit's bottom
layer (for unsaturated soil and clay liner sce-
narios only), based on the initial moisture
content and the hydraulic conductivity of
each layer.
Although data were collected for all 102
sites, these data were only used for the
unlined landfills, waste piles, and land appli-
cation units. For the clay liner scenarios
(landfills and waste piles only), EPA grouped
sites and ran the HELP model only for a sub-
set of the facilities that were representative of
the ranges of precipitation, evaporation, and
soil type. The grouping is discussed further in
the IWEM Technical Background Document
(U.S. EPA, 2002a).
In addition to climate factors and the par-
ticular unit design, the infiltration rates calcu-
lated by HELP are affected by the landfill
cover design, the permeability of the waste
material in waste piles, and the soil type of
the land application unit. For every climate
station and WMU design, multiple HELP
infiltration rates are calculated. In Tier 1, for
a selected WMU type and design, the
EPACMTP Monte Carlo modeling process
was used to randomly select from among the
HELP-derived infiltration and recharge data.
MINTEQA2 is a geochemical equilibrium speciation model for computing equilibria among the dis-
solved, absorbed, solid, and gas phases in dilute aqueous solution.
7A-17
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
This process captured both the nationwide
variation in climate conditions and variations
in soil type. In Tier 2, the WMU location is a
required user input, and the climate factors
used in HELP are fixed. However, in Tier 2,
the Monte Carlo process is still used to
account for local variability in the soil type,
landfill cover design, and permeability of
waste placed in waste piles.
3. Important Concepts for Use
of IWEM
Several important concepts are critical to
understanding how IWEM functions. These
concepts include 90th percentile exposure
concentration, dilution and attenuations fac-
tors (DAFs), reference ground-water concen-
trations (RGCs), leachate concentration
threshold values (LCTVs), and units designs.
a. 90th Percentile Exposure
Concentration
The 90th percentile exposure concentra-
tion was chosen to represent the estimated
constituent concentration at a well for a
given leachate concentration. The 90th per-
centile exposure concentration was selected
because this concentration is protective for
90 percent of the model simulations con-
ducted for a Tier 1 or Tier 2 analysis. In Tier
1, the 90th percentile concentration is used
to calculate a DAE, which is then used to gen-
erate a leachate concentration threshold value
(LCTV). In Tier 2, the 90th percentile con-
centration is directly compared with a refer-
ence ground-water concentration to
determine whether a liner system is neces-
sary, and if so whether the particular liner
design is protective for a site.
The 90th percentile exposure concentra-
tion is determined by running EPACMTP in a
Monte Carlo mode for 10,000 realizations.
For each realization, EPACMTP calculates a
maximum average concentration at a well,
depending on the exposure duration of the
reference ground-water concentration (RGC)
of interest. For example, IWEM assumes a
30-year exposure duration for carcinogens,
and therefore, the maximum average concen-
tration is the highest 30-year average across
the modeling horizon. After calculating the
maximum average concentrations across the
10,000 realizations, the concentrations are
arrayed from lowest to highest and the 90th
percentile of this distribution is selected as
the constituent concentration for IWEM.
Once the 90th percentile exposure con-
centration is determined, it is used in one of
two ways. For both the Tier 1 analysis and
the Tier 2 analysis, the 90th percentile expo-
sure concentration is compared with the
expected waste leachate concentration to
generate a DAE This calculation is discussed
further in the following section. For Tier 2,
the 90th percentile exposure concentration is
the concentration of interest for the analysis.
The 90th percentile exposure concentration
can be directly compared with the reference
ground-water concentration to assist in waste
management decision-making.
b. Dilution and Attenuation Factors
DAFs represent the expected reduction in
waste constituent concentration resulting
from fate and transport in the subsurface. A
DAE is defined as the ratio of the constituent
concentration in the waste leachate to the
concentration at the well, or:
CL
DAE =
where: DAF is the dilution and attenua-
tion factor;
CL is the leachate concentration
(mg/L); and
Cw is the ground-water well con-
centration (mg/L).
7A-18
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
The magnitude of a DAF reflects the com-
bined effect of all dilution and attenuation
processes that occur in the unsaturated and
saturated zones. The lowest possible value of
a DAF is one. A DAF of 1 means that there is
no dilution or attenuation at all; the concen-
tration at a well is the same as that in the
waste leachate. High DAF values, on the
other hand, correspond to a high degree of
dilution and attenuation. This means that the
expected concentration at the well will be
much lower than the concentration in the
leachate. For any specific site, the DAF
depends on the interaction of waste con-
stituent characteristics (e.g., whether or not
the constituent degrades or sorbs), site-specif-
ic factors (e.g., depth to ground water, hydro-
geology), and physical and chemical
processes in the subsurface environment. In
addition, the DAF calculation does not take
into account when the exposure occurs, as
long as it is within a 10,000-year time-frame
following the initial release of leachate. Thus,
if two constituents have different mobility, the
first might reach the well in 10 years, while
the second constituent might not reach the
well for several hundred years. EPACMTP,
however, can calculate the same or very simi-
lar DAF values for both constituents.
For the Tier 1 analysis in IWEM, DAFs are
based on the 90th percentile exposure con-
centration. EPACMTP was implemented by
randomly selecting one of the settings from
the WMU database and assigning a unit
leachate concentration to each site until
10,000 runs had been conducted for a WMU.
The resulting 10,000 maximum well concen-
trations based on the averaging period associ-
ated with the exposure duration of interest
(i.e., 1-year, 7-years, 30-years) were then
arrayed from lowest to highest. The 90th per-
centile concentration of this distribution is
then used as the concentration in the ground-
water well (Cw) for calculating the DAF. The
DAF is similarly calculated for the Tier 2, but
because the site-specific leachate concentra-
tion is used in the EPACMTP model runs, the
90th percentile exposure concentration can
be compared directly to the RGC.
c. Reference Ground-Water
Concentration (RGC)
As used in this Guide and by IWEM, a ref-
erence ground-water concentration (RGC) is
defined as a constituent concentration thresh-
old in a well that is protective of human
health. RGCs have been developed based on
maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) and
health-based-numbers (HBN). Each con-
stituent can have up to five RGCs: 1) based
on an MCL, 2) based on carcinogenic effects
from ingestion, 3) based on carcinogenic
effects from inhalation while showering, 4)
based on non-carcinogenic effects from inges-
tion, and 5) based on non-carcinogenic
effects from inhalation while showering.
The IWEM's database includes 226 con-
stituents with at least one RGC. Of the 226
constituents, 57 have MCLs (see Table 3),
212 have ground-water ingestion HBNs, 139
have inhalation HBNs, and 57 have both an
MCL and HBN. The HBNs were developed
using standard EPA exposure assumptions for
residential receptors. For carcinogens, IWEM
used a target risk level equal to the probabili-
ty that there might be one increased cancer
case per one million exposed people (com-
monly referred to as a 1x10~6 cancer risk).
The target hazard quotient used to calculate
the HBNs for noncarcinogens was 1 (unit-
less). A hazard quotient of 1 indicates that
the estimated dose is equal to the oral refer-
ence dose (RfD) or inhalation reference con-
centration (RfC). These targets were used to
calculate unique HBNs for each constituent of
concern and each exposure route of concern
(ingestion or inhalation). For further informa-
tion on the derivation of the IWEM RGCs,
see the Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model Technical Background
7A-19
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Document (U.S. EPA, 2002a). Users also can
add new constituents and RGCs can vary
depending on the protective goal. For exam-
ple, states can impose more stringent drink-
ing water standards than federal MCLs.6 To
keep the software developed for this Guide
up-to-date, and to accommodate concerns at
levels different from the current RGCs, the
RGC values in the IWEM software tool can
be modified by the user of the software.
d. Leachate Concentration Threshold
Values (LCTVs)
The purpose of the Tier 1 analysis in
IWEM is to determine whether a liner system
is needed, and if so, to recommend liner sys-
tem designs or determine the appropriateness
of land application with minimal site-specific
data. These recommendations are based on
LCTVs that were calculated to be protective
for each waste constituent in a unit. These
LCTVs are the maximum leachate concentra-
tions for which water in a well is not likely to
exceed the corresponding RGC. The LCTV
for each constituent accounts for dilution and
attenuation in the unsaturated and saturated
zones prior to reaching a well. An LCTV has
been generated for a no liner/in situ soils sce-
nario and for two standard liner types (i.e.,
single clay liner and composite liner) and
each RGC developed for a constituent.
The LCTV for a specific constituent is the
product of the RGC and the DAE:
LCTV = DAE * MCL
or LCTV = DAE * HBN
Where: LCTV is the leachate concentra-
tion threshold value
DAE is the dilution and attenua-
tion factor
MCL is the maximum concentra-
tion level
HBN is the health-based number
The evaluation of whether a liner system is
needed and subsequent liner system design
recommendations is determined by compar-
ing the expected waste constituent leachate
concentrations to the corresponding calculat-
ed LCTVs. LCTVs are calculated for all unit
types (i.e., landfills, waste piles, surface
impoundments, land application units) by
type of design (i.e., no liner/in situ soils, sin-
gle liner, or composite liner).7 The Tier 1
evaluation is generally the most protective
and calculates LCTVs using data collected on
WMUs throughout the United States.8 LCTVs
used in Tier 1 are designed to be protective
to a level of IxlO6 for carcinogens or a non-
cancer hazard quotient of < 1.0 with a 90
percent certainty considering the range of
variability associated with the waste sites
across the United States. LCTVs from the Tier
1 analysis are generally applicable to sites
across the country; users can determine
whether a specific liner design for a WMU is
protective by comparing expected leachate
concentrations for constituents in their waste
with the LCTVs for each liner design.
The Tier 2 analysis differs from the Tier 1
analysis in that IWEM calculates a site-specif-
ic DAE in Tier 2. This allows the model to
calculate a site-specific 90th percentile expo-
sure concentration that can be compared
with an RGC to determine if a liner system is
needed and to recommend the appropriate
liner system if necessary. The additional cal-
culation of an LCTV is not necessary. IWEM
continues to perform the calculation, howev-
er, to help users determine whether waste
minimization might be appropriate to meet a
specific design. For example, a facility might
7A-20
For example, a state can make secondary MCLs mandatory, which are not federally enforceable stan-
dards, or a state might use different exposure assumptions, which can result in a different HBN. In
addition, states can choose to use a different risk target than is used in this Guidance.
LCTVs are influenced by liner designs because of different infiltration rates.
For additional information on the nationwide data used in the modeling, set
Background Document (U.S. EPA, 2002a).
the IWEM Technical
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
find it more cost effective to reduce the con-
centration of constituents in its waste and
design a clay-lined landfill than to dispose of
the current waste in a composite landfill. The
LCTV calculated for the Tier 2 analysis is
based on the expected leachate concentration
for a specific site and site-specific data for
several sensitive parameters. Because the Tier
2 analysis includes site-specific considera-
tions, LCTVs from this analysis are not
applicable to other sites.
e. Determination of Liner Designs
The primary method of controlling the
release of waste constituents to the subsurface
is to install a low permeability liner at the
base of a WMU. A liner generally consists of a
layer of clay or other material with a low
hydraulic conductivity that is used to prevent
or mitigate the flow of liquids from a WMU.
The type of liner that is appropriate for a spe-
cific WMU, however, is highly dependent
upon a number of location-specific character-
istics, such as climate and hydrogeology.
These characteristics are critical in determin-
ing the amount of liquid that migrates into
the subsurface from a WMU and in predicting
the release of contaminants to ground water.
The IWEM software is intended to assist
the user in determining if a new industrial
waste management unit can rely on a no
liner/in situ soils design, or whether one of
the two recommended liners designs, single
clay liner or composite liner, should be used.
The no liner/in situ soils design (Figure 2a)
represents a WMU that relies upon location-
specific conditions, such as low permeability
native soils beneath the unit or low annual
precipitation rates to mitigate the release of
contaminants to groundwater. The single clay
liner (Figure 2b) design represents a 3-foot
thick clay liner with a low hydraulic conduc-
tivity (IxlO7 cm/sec) beneath a WMU. A
composite liner design (Figure 2c) consists of
a flexible membrane liner in contact with a
clay liner. In Tier 2, users also can evaluate
other liner designs by providing a site-specific
infiltration rate based on the liner design. For
land applications units, only the no liner/in
situ soils scenario is evaluated because liners
are not typically used at this type of facility.
To determine an appropriate design in Tier
1, IWEM compares expected leachate con-
centrations for all of the constituents in the
leachate to constituent-specific LCTVs and
then reports the minimum design system that
is protective for all constituents. If the expect-
ed leachate concentrations of all waste con-
stituents are lower than their respective no
liner/in situ soils LCTVs, the proposed WMU
does not need a liner to contain the waste.
On the other hand, if the Tier 1 screening
evaluation indicates a liner is recommended,
a user can verify this recommendation with a
follow-up Tier 2 (or possibly Tier 3) analysis
for at least those constituents whose expected
leachate concentrations exceed the Tier 1
LCTV values.
If the user proceeds to a Tier 2 analysis,
IWEM will evaluate the three standard
designs or it can evaluate a user-supplied
liner design. The user can supply a liner
design by providing a site-specific infiltration
rate that reflects the expected infiltration rate
through the user's liner system. In the Tier 2
analysis, IWEM conducts a location-adjusted
Monte Carlo analysis based on user inputs to
generate a 90th percentile exposure concen-
tration for the site. The 90th percentile expo-
sure concentration is then compared with the
RGC to determine whether a liner is consid-
ered necessary, and where appropriate, rec-
ommend the design that is protective for each
constituent expected in the leachate. If the
Tier 2 analysis indicates that the no liner/in
situ soils scenario or the user-defined liner is
not protective, the user can proceed to a full
site-specific Tier 3 analysis.
7A-21
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Figure 2. Three Liner Scenarios Considered in the Tiered Modeling Approach for Industrial
Waste Guidelines
: JMatiye.Soil;:
Clay Liner
Clay Liner
.Flexible
Membrane
Liner
a) No Liner/In Situ Soils Scenario
b) Single Liner Scenario
c) Composite Liner Scenario
B. Tier 1 Evaluations
In a Tier 1 evaluation, IWEM compares
the expected leachate concentration for each
constituent with the LCTVs cafcufated for
these constituents and determines a mini-
mum recommended design that is protective
for all waste constituents. The required
inputs are: the type of WMU the user wishes
to evaluate, the constituents of concern, and
the expected leachate concentrations of con-
stituents of concern. The results for each
constituent have been compiled for each unit
type and design and are available in the
IWEM Technical Background Document (U.S.
EPA, 2002a) and in the model on the CD-
ROM version of this Guide.
The tabulated results for Tier f of IWEM
have been generated by running the
EPACMTP for a wide range of conditions that
reflect the varying site conditions that can be
expected to occur at waste sites across the
United States. The process, which was used
to simulate varying site conditions, is known
as a Monte Carlo analysis. A Monte Carlo
analysis determines the statistical probability
or certainty that the release of leachate might
result in a ground-water concentration
exceeding regulatory or risk-based standards.
For the Tier 1 analysis, 10,000 realizations
of EPACMTP were run for each constituent,
WMU, and design combination to generate
distributions of maximum average exposure
concentrations for each constituent by WMU
and design. These distributions reflect the vari-
ability among industrial waste management
units across the United States. The 90th per-
centile concentration from this distribution was
then used to calculate a DAE for each con-
stituent by WMU and design. Each of these
DAFs was then combined with constituent-
specific RGCs to generate the LCTVs presented
About Monte Carlo Analysis
Monte Carlo analysis is a computer-
based method of analysis developed in
the 1940s that uses statistical sampling
techniques in obtaining a probabilistic
approximation to the solution of a math-
ematical equation or model. The name
refers to the city on the French Riviera,
which is known for its gambling and
other games of chance. Monte Carlo
analysis is increasingly used in risk
assessments because it allows the risk
manager to make decisions based on a
statistical level of protection that reflects
the variability and/or uncertainty in risk
parameters or processes, rather than
making decisions based on a single point
estimate of risk. For further information
on Monte Carlo analysis in risk assess-
ment, see EPAs Guiding Principles for
Monte Carlo Analysis. (U.S. EPA, 1997b).
7A-22
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
in the IWEM software and in the tables includ-
ed in the technical background document.
The advantages of a Tier 1 screening evalu-
ation are that it is fast, and it does not require
site-specific information. The disadvantage of
the Tier 1 screening evaluation is that the
analysis does not use site-specific information
and might result in a design recommendation
that is more stringent than is needed for a
particular site. For instance, site-specific con-
ditions, such as low precipitation and a deep
unsaturated zone, might warrant a less strin-
gent design. Before implementing a Tier 1
recommendation, it is recommended that you
also perform a Tier 2 assessment for at least
those waste constituents for which Tier 1
indicates that a no liner design is not protec-
tive. The following sections provide addition-
al information on how to use the Tier 1
lookup tables.
1. How Are the Tier 1 Lookup
Tables Used?
The Tier 1 tables provide an easy-to-use
tool to assist waste management decision-
making. Important benefits of the Tier 1
approach are that it requires minimum data
from the user and provides immediate guid-
ance on protective design scenarios. There are
only three data requirements for the Tier 1
analysis: WMU type, constituents expected in
the waste leachate, and the expected leachate
concentration for each constituent in the
waste. The Tier 1 tables are able to provide
immediate guidance because EPACMTP simu-
lations for each constituent, WMU, and
design combinations were run previously for
a national-scale assessment to generate appro-
priate LCTVs for each combination. Because
the simulations represent a national-scale
assessment, the LCTVs in the Tier 1 tables
represent levels in leachate that are protective
at most sites.
As noted previously in this chapter, one of
the first steps in a ground-water risk assess-
ment is to characterize the waste going into a
unit. Characterization of the waste includes
identifying the constituents expected in the
leachate and estimating leachate concentra-
tions for each of these constituents.
Identification of constituents expected in
leachate can be based on process knowledge
or chemical analysis of the waste. Leachate
concentrations can be estimated using
process knowledge or an analytical leaching
test appropriate to the circumstances, such as
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP). For more information on
identifying waste constituents, estimating
waste constituent leachate concentrations,
and selecting appropriate leaching tests, refer
to Chapter 2 — Characterizing Waste.
The following example illustrates the Tier
1 process for evaluating a proposed design
for an industrial landfill. The example
assumes the expected leachate concentration
for toluene is 1.6 mg/L and styrene is 1.0
Information Needed to
Use Tier 1 Lookup Tables
Waste management Landfill, surface
unit types: impoundment,
waste pile, or land
application unit.
Constituents
expected
in the leachate:
Leachate
concentrations:
Constituent names
and/or CAS numbers.
Expected leachate
concentration of
each constituent or
concentration in
surface impound-
ments or waste to be
applied.
7A-23
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
mg/L. Both toluene and styrene have three
LCTVs: one based on an MCL, one based on
non-cancer ingestion, and one based on non-
cancer inhalation. Tables 4 and 5 provide
detailed summary information for the no
liner/in situ soils scenario for MCL-based
LCTVs and the HBN-based LCTVs, respec-
tively that is similar to the information that
can be found in the actual look-up tables.
For the Tier 1 MCL-based analysis pre-
sented in Table 4, the results provide the
following information: constituent CAS
number, constituent name, constituent-spe-
cific MCL, user-provided leachate concen-
tration, constituent-specific DAF, the
constituent-specific LCTV, and whether the
specified design is protective at the target
risk level. To provide a recommendation as
to whether a specific design is protective or
not, IWEM compares the LCTV with the
leachate concentration to determine
whether the design is protective. In the
example presented in Table 4, the no
liner/in situ soils scenario is not protective
for styrene because the leachate concentra-
tion provided by the user (1.0 mg/L) is
greater than the Tier 1 LCTV (0.22 mg/L).
For toluene, the no liner/in situ soils sce-
nario is protective because the leachate con-
centration (1.6 mg/L) is less than the Tier 1
LCTV (2.2 mg/L).
For the health-based number (HBN)-based
results presented in Table 5, the detailed
results present similar information to that
presented for the MCL-based results. The dif-
ferences are that the HBN-results present the
constituent-specific HBN rather than the
MCL and include an additional column that
identifies the pathway and effect that support
the development of the LCTV For the con-
trolling pathway and effect column, IWEM
would indicate whether the most protective
pathway is ingestion of drinking water (indi-
cated by ingestion) or inhalation during
showering (indicated by inhalation) and
whether the adverse effect is a cancer or non-
cancer effect. In this example, both styrene
and toluene have two HBN-based LCTVS:
one for ingestion non-cancer and one for
inhalation non-cancer. Only the results for
the controlling HBN exposure pathway and
effect are shown. In Table 5, only the results
for the inhalation-during-showering pathway
for non-cancer effects are shown because this
is the most protective pathway (that is, the
LCTV for the inhalation-during-showing
pathway is lower than the LCTV for ingestion
of drinking water) for both of these con-
stituents. As shown in Table 5, comparison of
the leachate concentration of styrene (1.0
mg/L) and toluene (1.6 mg/L) to their respec-
tive LCTVs (8.0 mg/L and 2.9 mg/L) indi-
cates that the no liner/in situ soils design is
protective for the Tier 1 HBN-based LCTVs.
Based on the results for the no liner/in situ
soils scenario, the user could proceed to the
comparison of the expected leachate concen-
tration for styrene with the MCL-based LCTV
for a single clay liner to determine whether
the single clay liner design is protective. The
Table 4:
Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfills - No Liner/In situ Soils
CAS # Constituent MCL (mg/L) Leachate Concentration (mg/L) DAF LCTV (mg/L) Protective?
100-42-5
108-88-3
Styrene 0.1
Toluene 1.0
1.0 2.2 0.22 No
1.6 2.2 2.2 Yes
7A-24
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 5:
Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for HBN-based LCTVs for Landfills - No Liner/In situ Soils
CAS # Constituent HBN (mg/L) Leachate DAF
Concentration
(mg/L)
100-42-5 Styrene 3.6 1.0 2.2
108-88-3 Toluene 1.3 1.6 2.2
LCTV (mg/L) Protective?
8.0 Yes
2.9 Yes
Controlling
Pathway &
Effect
Inhalation
Non-cancer
Inhalation
Non-cancer
user also can proceed to a Tier 2 or Tier 3
analysis to determine whether a more site-
specific approach might indicate that the no
liner/in situ soils design is protective for the
site. Table 6 presents the Tier 1 results for the
single clay liner. As shown, the single clay
liner would not be protective for the MCL-
based analysis because the expected leachate
concentration for styrene (1.0 mg/L) exceeds
the LCTV for styrene (0.61 mg/L). Based on
these results, the user could continue on to
evaluate whether a composite liner is protec-
tive for styrene.
Table 7 presents the results of the Tier 1
MCL-based analysis for a composite liner.9 A
comparison of the leachate concentration for
styrene (1.0 mg/L) to the MCL-based LCTV
(1000 mg/L) indicates that the composite
liner is the recommended liner based on a
Tier 1 analysis that will be protective for both
styrene and toluene.
2. What Do the Results Mean
and How Do I Interpret Them?
For the Tier 1 analysis, IWEM evaluates
the no liner/in situ soils, single clay liner, and
Table 6:
Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfills - Single Clay Liner
^^^^^^H
100-42-5
108-88-3
Constituent
Styrene
Toluene
MCL (mg/L)
0.1
1.0
Leachate Concentration (mg/L)
1.0
1.6
DAF
6.1
6.1
LCTV (mg/L)
0.61
6.1
Protective?
No
Yes
Table 7:
Example of Tier 1 Summary Table for MCL-based LCTVs for Landfills - Composite Liner
CAS#
100-42-5
108-88-3
Constituent
Styrene
Toluene
MCL (mg/L)
0.1
1.0
Leachate Concentration (mg/L)
1
1
0
6
DAF LC
5.4xl04
2.9xlO+
TV (mg/L)
1000
1000
Protective?
Yes
Yes
Table 7 also indicates the effect of the 1000 mg/L cap on the results. The LCTV results from multiply-
ing the RGC with the DAF. In this example, the MCL for styrene (0.1 mg/L) multiplied by the unitless
DAF (5.4 x 104) would result in an LCTV of 5,400 mg/L, but because LCTVs are capped, the LCTV for
styrene in a composite liner is capped at 1,000 mg/L. See Chapter 6 of the Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model Technical Background Document (U.S. EPA, 2002a) for further information.
7A-25
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
composite liner design scenarios, in that
order. Generally, if the expected leachate con-
centrations for all constituents are lower than
the no liner LCTVs, the proposed unit does
not need a liner to contain this waste. If any
expected constituent concentration is higher
than the no liner/in situ soils LCTY a single
compacted clay liner or composite liner
would be recommended for containment of
the waste using the Tier 1 analysis. If any
expected concentration is higher than the
single clay liner LCTV, the recommendation
is at least a composite liner. If any expected
concentration is higher than the composite
liner LCTV, pollution prevention, treatment,
or additional controls should be considered,
or a Tier 2 or Tier 3 analysis can be conduct-
ed to consider site-specific factors before
making a final judgment. For waste streams
with multiple constituents, the most protec-
tive design that is recommended for any one
constituent is the overall recommendation. In
the example illustrated in Tables 4, 5, 6, and
7, the recommended design is a composite
liner because the expected leachate concen-
tration for styrene exceeds the no liner/in situ
soils and clay liner LCTVs in the MCL-based
analysis, but is lower than the composite
liner LCTV For the HBN-based analysis, a no
liner/in situ soils design would provide ade-
quate protection for the site because, as
shown in Table 5, the leachate concentrations
for styrene and toluene are lower than their
respective HBN-based LCTVs.
The interpretation for land application is
similar to the interpretation for landfills.
However, only the no liner/in situ soils sce-
nario is evaluated for land application
because these types of units generally do not
use liner systems. Thus, if all the waste
leachate concentrations are below the no
liner/in situ soils MCL-based and HBN-based
LCTVs in the Tier 1 lookup tables, land-
applying waste might be appropriate for the
site. If the waste has one or more con-
stituents whose concentrations exceed a land
application threshold, the recommendation is
that land application might not be appropri-
ate. The model does not consider the other
design scenarios.
After conducting the Tier 1 evaluation,
users should consider the following steps:
• Perform additional evaluations.
The Tier 1 evaluation provides a con-
servative screening assessment whose
values are calculated to be protective
over a range of conditions and situa-
tions. Although a user could elect to
install a liner based on the Tier 1
results, it is appropriate that a user
consider Tier 2 or Tier 3 evaluations
to confirm these recommendations.
• Consider pollution prevention,
recycling, or treatment. If you do
not want to conduct a Tier 2 or Tier
3 analysis, and the waste has one or
more "problem" constituents that call
for a more stringent and costly design
system (or which make land applica-
tion inappropriate), you could con-
sider pollution prevention, recycling,
and treatment options for those con-
stituents. Options that previously
might have appeared economically
infeasible, might be worthwhile if
they can reduce the problem con-
stituent concentration to a level that
results in a different design recom-
mendation or would make land
application appropriate. Then, after
implementing these measures, repeat
the Tier 1 evaluation. Based on the
results presented in Table 6, pollution
prevention, recycling, or treatment
measures could be used to reduce the
expected leachate concentration for
styrene below 0.61 mg/L so that a
single liner is recommended for the
unit. Consult Chapter 3—Integrating
7A-26
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Pollution Prevention, for ideas and
tools.
Implement recommendations. You
can design the unit based on the
design recommendations of the Tier
1 lookup tables without performing
further analysis or considering pollu-
tion prevention or recycling activities.
In the case of land application, a land
application system might be devel-
oped (after evaluating other factors) if
the lookup tables found no liner nec-
essary for all constituents. In either
case, it is recommended that you
consult the appropri-
1. How is a Tier 2 Analysis
Performed?
Under Tier 2, the user can provide site-
specific information to refine the design rec-
ommendations. The Tier 2 analysis leads the
user through a series of data entry screens
and then runs EPACMTP to generate a design
recommendation based on the site-specific
information provided by the user. The user
can provide data related to the WMU, the
subsurface environment, infiltration rates,
physicochemical properties, and toxicity The
user can evaluate the three designs discussed
above or provide data reflecting a site-specific
ate agency to ensure
compliance with
state regulations.
Figure 3 illustrates the
basic steps using the Tier 1
lookup tables to determine
an appropriate design for a
proposed waste manage-
ment unit or whether land
application is appropriate.
C. Tier 2
Evaluations
The Tier 2 evaluation is
designed to provide a
more accurate evaluation
than Tier 1 by allowing
the user to provide site-
specific data. In many
cases, a Tier 2 evaluation
might suggest a less strin-
gent and less costly design
than a Tier 1 evaluation
would recommend. This
section describes the
inputs for the analysis and
the process for determin-
ing a protective recom-
mendation.
Figure 3. Using Tier 1 Lookup Tables
Identify proposed WMU type.
Estimate waste leachate concentration for
all potential constituents expected to be
present in the waste.
YES
Compare expected leachate concentrations
to calculated LCTVs for all potential
constituents.
Will pollution preven-
tion, recycling, or treat-
ment be implemented to
reduce concentrations of
problem constituents?
Consider implement-
ing liner and/or land
application recom-
mendation, or obtain-
ing additional data for
a Tier 2 or Tier 3
analysis.
Consider a Tier 2 evaluation or
performing a comprehensive Tier
3 site-specific ground-water fate
and transport analysis.
7A-27
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
liner design. As a result, a Tier 2 analysis
provides a protective design recommendation
intended only for use at the user's site, and is
not intended to be applied to other sites.
This section discusses the inputs that a user
can provide and the results from the analysis.
a. Tier 2 Inputs
In addition to the inputs required for the
Tier 1 analysis, a Tier 2 analysis allows users
to provide additional inputs that account for
attributes that are specific to the user's site.
The Tier 2 inputs that are common to the
Tier 1 evaluation are:
• WMU type—waste pile, surface
impoundment, or land application
unit.
• Chemical constituents of concern
present in the WMU.
• Leachate concentration (in mg/L) of
each constituent.
If the user has already performed a Tier 1
analysis and continues to a Tier 2 analysis,
the Tier 1 inputs are carried forward to the
Tier 2 analysis. In the Tier 2 analysis, howev-
er, the user can change these data without
changing the Tier 1 data.
In addition to the Tier 1 inputs, the user
also provides values for additional parameters
including WMU area, WMU depth for land-
fills, ponding depth for surface impound-
ments, and the climate center in the IWEM
database that is nearest to the site. These
parameters can have a significant influence
on the LCTVs generated by the model and
also are relatively easy to determine. The user
also has the option to provide values for sev-
eral more parameters. Table 8 presents the
list of "required" and "optional" parameters.
Because site-specific data for all of the
EPACMTP parameters might not be available,
the model contains default values for the
"optional" parameters that are used unless
the user provides site-specific data. The
default values are derived from a number of
sources, including a survey of industrial
waste management units, a hydrogeologic
database, water-balance modeling, and values
reported in the scientific literature. The selec-
tion of default values is explained in the
IWEM Technical Background Document (U.S.
EPA, 2002a). If site-specific data are avail-
able, they should be used to derive the most
appropriate design scenario for a particular
site.10
In addition to the above parameters, users
can also enter certain constituent specific
properties, as follows:
• Organic carbon distribution coeffi-
cient (KOC). A function of the nature
of a sorbent (the soil and its organic
carbon content) and the properties of
a chemical (the leachate constituent).
It is equal to the ratio of the solid
and dissolved phase concentrations,
measured in milliliters per gram
(mL/g). The higher the value of the
distribution coefficient, the higher
the adsorbed-phase concentration,
meaning the constituent would be
less mobile. For metals, IWEM pro-
vides an option to enter a site-specif-
ic soil-water partition coefficient (Kd),
which overrides the MINTEQA2
default sorption isotherms.
• Degradation coefficient. The rate at
which constituents degrade or decay
within an aquifer due to biochemical
processes, such as hydrolysis or
biodegradation (measured in units of
I/year). The default decay rate in
IWEM represents degradation from
chemical hydrolysis only, since
biodegradation rates are strongly
influenced by site-specific factors. In
Tier 2, a user can enter an overall
7A-28
10 A Tier 2 evaluation is not always less conservative than a Tier 1. For example, if a site has a very large
area, a very shallow water table, and/or the aquifer thickness is well below the national average, then
the Tier 2 evaluation results can be more stringent than the Tier 1 analysis results.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 8.
Input Parameters for Tier 2
Parameter Description Use in Model Units Applicable Required or
WMU Optional
WMU area
WMU location
Total waste
management unit
depth
Depth of waste
management unit
below ground
surface
Surface
Impoundment
sediment layer
thickness
WMU operational
life
WMU infiltration
rate
Soil type
Distance to a well
Hydrogeological
setting
Area covered by the WMU
Geographic location of WMU in terms of
the nearest of 102 climate stations
Depth of the unit for landfills (average
thickness of waste in the landfill, not
counting the thickness of a liner below the
waste or the thickness of a final cover on
top of the waste) and surface
impoundments (depth of the free-standing
liquid in the impoundment, not counting
the thickness of any accumulated sediment
layer at the base of the impoundment)
Depth of the base of the unit below the
ground surface
Thickness of sediment at the base of
surface impoundment (discounting
thickness of engineered liner, if present)
Period of time WMU is in operation.
Rate at which leachate flows from the
bottom of a WMU (including any liner)
into unsaturated zone
Predominant soil type in the vicinity of
the WMU
The distance from a WMU to a
downgradient well.
Information on the hydrogeological setting
of the WMU
To determine the area for
infiltration of leachate
To determine local climatic
conditions that affect infiltration
and aquifer recharge
For landfills, used to determine
the landfill depletion rate. For
surface impoundments, used
as the hydraulic head to derive
leakage
Used together with depth of the
water table to determine
distance leachate has to travel
through unsaturated zone to
reach ground water
Limits infiltration from unit.
IWEM assumes leachate
generation occurs over the same
period of time.
Affected by area's rainfall
intensity and design
performance. Users either input
infiltration rates directly or
allow IWEM to estimate values
based on the unit's geographic
location,11 liner design, cover
design and WMU type.
Uses site-specific soil data to
model leachate migration
through unsaturated zone and
determine regional recharge rate
To determine the horizontal
distance over which dilution
and attenuation occur.
Determines certain aquifer
characteristics (depth to water
table, saturated zone thickness,
saturated zone hydraulic
conductivity, ground-water
hydraulic gradient) when
complete information not
available
Square meters (m2)
Unitless
Meters (m)
Meters (m)
Meters (m)
Years
Meters per year
(m/yr)
sandy loam
silt loam
silty clay loam
Meters (m)
Varies
All
All
LF
SI
LF
SI
WP
SI
WP
SI
LAU
All
All
All
All
Required
Required
Required for
landfills and
surface
impoundments
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
For surface impoundments IWEM can use either the unit's geographic location or impoundment characteristics
(such as ponding depth, and thickness of sediment layer) to estimate the infiltration rates.
7A-29
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 8.
Input Parameters for Tier 2 (con't)
Parameter Description Use in Model Units Applicable Required or
WMU Optional
Depth to the water
table
Saturated zone
thickness
Saturated zone
hydraulic
conductivity
Ground-water
hydraulic gradient
Distance to nearest
surface water body
The depth of the zone between the land
surface and the water table
Thickness of the saturated zone of the
aquifer
Hydraulic conductivity of the saturated
zone , or the permeability of the saturated
zone in the horizontal direction.
Regional horizontal ground-water gradient
The distance from the unit to the nearest
water body
Used to predict travel time.
Delineates the depth over
which leachates can mix with
ground waters.
With hydraulic gradient, used
to calculate ground-water flow
rates.
With hydraulic conductivity,
used to calculate the ground-
water flow rate.
Affects the calculation of
ground- water mounding at a site
Meters (m)
Meters (m)
Meters per year
(m/yr)
Meters per meter
(m/m)
Meters (m)
All
All
All
All
SI
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
Optional
b.
degradation rate which overrides the
IWEM default. A user can choose to
include degradation due to hydroly-
sis and biodegradation in the overall
degradation rate.
Tier 2 Results
After providing site-specific inputs, the
user generates design recommendations for
each constituent by launching EPACMTP
from within IWEM. EPACMTP will then sim-
ulate the site and determine the 90th per-
centile exposure concentration for each
design scenario. IWEM determines the mini-
mum recommended design at a 90th per-
centile exposure concentration by performing
10,000 Monte Carlo simulations of
EPACMTP for each waste constituent and
design. Upon completion of the modeling
analyses, IWEM will display the minimum
design recommendation and the calculated,
location-specific LCTVs based on the 90th
percentile exposure concentration.
The overall result of a Tier 2 analysis is a
design recommendation similar to the Tier 1
analysis. However, the basis for the recom-
mendation differs slightly. To illustrate the
similarities and differences between the
results from the two tiers, the remainder of
this section continues the example Tier 1
evaluation through a Tier 2 evaluation. In the
Tier 1 example, the disposal of toluene and
styrene in a proposed landfill is evaluated.
The expected leachate concentration for
toluene is 1.6 mg/L and the expected
leachate concentration for styrene is 1.0
mg/L. In Tier 2, after inputting the site-spe-
cific data summarized in Table 9 and using
default data for the remaining parameters,
the user can then launch the EPACMTP
model simulations.
After completing the EPACMTP model
simulations, IWEM produces the results on
screen. Table 10 presents the detailed results
of a Tier 2 analysis for the no liner/in situ
soils scenario. The data presented in this
table are similar to the data presented in the
Tier 1 results, but the Tier 2 analysis expands
7A-30
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 9.
A Sample Set of Site-Specific Data for Input to Tier 2
Parameters Site-Specific Data
Infiltration rate*
Waste management unit area
Waste management unit depth
Depth to the water table
Aquifer thickness
Toxicity standards
Distance to a well
Local climate: Madison, WI
Soil type: fine-grained soil
15,000 m2
2m
10m
25m
Compare to all
150m
* The Tier 2 model uses an infiltration rate for the liner scenarios
based on local climate and soil data.
the information provided to
the user. It includes additional
information regarding the tox-
icity standard, the reference
ground-water concentration
(RGC), and the 90th per-
centile exposure concentra-
tion. The toxicity standard is
included because the user can
select specific standards, pro-
vide a user-defined standard,
or compare to all standards. In
this example, all standards
were selected; the user can
identify the result for each
standard from a single table.
The LCTV continues to repre-
sent the maximum leachate
CAS#
Table 10:
Example of Tier 2 Detailed Summary Table - No Liner/In situ Soils
Constituent Leachate DAF LCTV
Concentration (mg/L)
(mg/L)
Toxicity Ref.
Standard Ground-
water
Cone. (mg/L)
90th Percentile
Exposure
Concentration
(mg/L)
Protective?
100-42-5 Styrene
100-42-5 Styrene
100-42-5 Styrene
108-88-3 Toluene
108-88-3 Toluene
108-88-3 Toluene
1.0 8.3 0.83 MCL 0.1
1.0 8.3 29.88 HBN- 3.6
Ingestion
Non-
Cancer
1.0 8.3 40.67 HBN- 4.9
Inhalation
Non-
cancer
1.6 8.3 8.3 MCL 1
1.6 8.4 10.92 HBN- 1.3
Ingestion
Non-
cancer
1.6 8.4 41.16 HBN- 4.9
Inhalation
Non-
cancer
0.1201 No
0.1201 Yes
0.1201 Yes
0.1922 Yes
0.1894 Yes
0.1894 Yes
7A-31
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
concentration for a design scenario that is
still protective for a reference ground-water
concentration, but the LCTV is not the basis
for the design recommendation.
The RGC and 90th percentile exposure
concentration are provided because they are
the point of comparison for the Tier 2 analy-
sis. (The LCTV, however, continues to provide
information about a threshold that might be
useful for pollution prevention or waste mini-
mization efforts.) As shown in Table 10, the
no liner/in situ soils scenario is protective for
toluene because all of the 90th percentile
exposure concentrations are less than the
three RGCs for toluene, while the no liner/in
situ soils scenario is not protective for styrene
for the MCL comparison. For that standard,
the 90th percentile exposure concentration
(0.1201 mg/L) exceeds the RGC (0.1 mg/L).
In this case, IWEM would launch EPACMTP
to evaluate a clay liner to determine whether
that liner design would be protective.
Table 11 provides the single clay liner
results for a Tier 2 analysis. As shown in the
table, the single clay liner is protective
because the 90th percentile exposure concen-
tration (0.0723 mg/L) is less than the refer-
ence ground-water concentration (0.1 mg/L).
In addition, under the "Protective?" column,
IWEM refers the user to the appropriate liner
result if a less stringent design is recom-
mended. In Table 11, the user is referred to
the no liner/in situ soils results for the HBN-
based ingestion and inhalation results
because, as shown in Table 10, the no
liner/in situ soils scenario is protective. If a
Tier 2 analysis determines that a single clay
liner is protective for all constituents, then
IWEM would not continue to an evaluation
of a composite liner. For this example of
styrene and toluene disposed of in a landfill,
the recommended minimum design is a sin-
gle clay liner, because the 90th percentile
exposure concentration (0.0723) is less than
the MCL-based RGC (0.1).
2. What Do the Results Mean
and How Do I Interpret Them?
The Tier 2 analysis provides LCTVs and
recommendations for a minimum protective
design. In the Tier 1 analysis, that recommen-
dation is based on a comparison of expected
leachate concentrations to LCTVs to determine
whether a design scenario is protective. In the
Table 11:
Example of Tier 2 Detailed Summary Table - Single Clay Liner
CAS#
Constituent Leachate DAF
Concentration
(mg/L)
LCTV Toxicity Ref. 90th Percentile Protective?
(mg/L) Standard Ground- Exposure
water Concentration
Cone. (mg/L) (mg/L)
100-42-5
100-42-5
100-42-5
Styrene
Styrene
Styrene
1.0 14 1.4 MCL 0.1
1.0 14 50.4 HBN- 3.6
Ingestion
Non-
Cancer
1.0 14 68.6 HBN- 4.9
Inhalation
Non-
cancer
0.0723 Yes
0.0722 See No liner
Results
0.0722 See No liner
Results
7A-32
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Tier 2 analysis, LCTVs can be used to help
waste managers determine whether waste min-
imization techniques might lower leachate
concentrations and enable them to use less
costly unit designs, but IWEM does not need
to calculate an LCTV to make a design recom-
mendation. If the 90th percentile ground-
water concentration does not exceed the
specified RGC, then the evaluated design sce-
nario is protective for that constituent. If the
90th percentile ground-water concentrations
for all constituents under the no liner/in situ
soils scenario are below their respective RGCs ,
then IWEM will recommend that no liner/in
situ soils is needed to protect the ground
water. If the 90th percentile ground-water con-
centration of any constituent exceeds its RGC,
then a single clay liner is recommended (or, in
the case of land application units, land appli-
cation is not recommended). Similarly, if the
90th percentile ground-water concentration of
any constituent under the single clay liner sce-
nario exceeds its RGC, then a composite liner
is recommended. As previously noted, howev-
er, you may decide to conduct a Tier 3 site-
specific analysis to determine which design
scenario is most appropriate. See the ensuing
section on Tier 3 analyses for further informa-
tion. For waste streams with multiple con-
stituents, the most protective liner design that
is recommended for any one constituent is the
overall recommendation. As in the Tier 1 eval-
uation, pollution prevention, recycling, and
treatment practices could be considered when
the protective standard of a composite liner is
exceeded if you decide not to undertake a Tier
3 assessment to reflect site-specific conditions.
If the Tier 2 analysis found land applica-
tion to be appropriate for the constituents of
concern, then a new land application system
may be considered (after evaluating other fac-
tors). Alternatively, if the waste has one or
more "problem" constituents that make land
application inappropriate, the user might
consider pollution prevention, recycling, and
treatment options for those constituents. If,
after conducting the Tier 2 evaluation, the
user is not satisfied with the resulting recom-
mendations, or if site-specific conditions
seem likely to suggest a different conclusion
regarding the appropriateness of land applica-
tion of a waste, then the user can conduct a
more in-depth, site-specific, ground-water
risk analysis (Tier 3).
In addition to the Tier 2 evaluation, other
fate and transport models have been devel-
oped that incorporate location-specific consid-
erations, such as the American Petroleum
Institute's (API's) Graphical Approach for
Determining Site-Specific Dilution-Attenuation
Factors.12 API developed its approach to calcu-
late facility-specific DAFs quickly using
graphs rather than computer models. Graphs
visually indicate the sensitivity to various
parameters. This approach can be used for
impacted soils located above or within an
aquifer. This approach accounts for attenua-
tion with distance and time due to
advective/dispersive processes. API's approach
has a preliminary level of analysis that uses a
small data set containing only measures of the
constituent plume's geometry. The user can
read other necessary factors off graphs provid-
ed as part of the approach. This approach also
has a second level of analysis in which the
user can expand the data set to include site-
specific measures, such as duration of con-
stituent leaching, biodegradation of
constituents, or site-specific dispersivity val-
ues. At either level of analysis, the calculation
results in a DAE This approach is not appro-
priate for all situations; for example, it should
not be used to estimate constituent concentra-
tions in active ground-water supply wells or
to model very complex hydrogeologic set-
tings, such as fractured rock. It is recom-
mended that you consult with the appropriate
state agency to discuss the applicability of the
API approach or any other location-adjusted
model prior to use.
' A copy of API's user manual, The Technical Background Document and User Manual (API Publication 4659),
can be obtained from the American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005,
202 682-8375.
7A-33
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
D. Strengths and
Limitations
Listed below are some of IWEM's strengths
and limitations that the user should be aware of:
1. Strengths
• The tool is relatively easy to use and
requires a minimal amount of data
and modeling expertise.
• The tool can perform rapid Tier 1
screening evaluations. Tier 2 evalua-
tions allow for many site-specific
adjustments.
• The tool is designed to be flexible
with respect to the availability of site-
specific data for a Tier 2 evaluation.
The user needs to provide only a
small number of inputs, but if more
data are available, the tool can
accommodate their input.
• Users can enter their own infiltration
rates to evaluate additional design
scenarios and still use IWEM to con-
duct a risk evaluation.
• The user can modify RGC values,
when appropriate, and in consulta-
tion with other stakeholders.
• The user can modify properties of
the 226 constituents (e.g., adding
biodegradation), and can add addi-
tional constituents for evaluation.
• The tool provides recommendations
for protective design systems. It can
also be used to evaluate whether
waste leachate reduction measures
would be appropriate.
2. Limitations
• IWEM considers only exposures
from contact with contaminated
ground water via ingestion of drink-
ing water and inhalation while show-
ering. IWEM does not consider
vapor intrusion into buildings. It also
does not address potential risks
through environmental pathways
other than ground water, such as
volatile emissions from a WMU, sur-
face runoff and erosion, and indirect
exposures through the food chain
pathway. Other chapters in this
Guide, however, address ways to
assess or control potential risks via
such other pathways.
The use of a waste concentration to
leachate concentration ratio of
10,000 in IWEM Tier 2 may overesti-
mate the amount of contaminant
mass in the WMU, allowing the
modeling results to approach non-
depleting source steady-state values
for WMUs without engineered liners.
This may result in an underestima-
tion of the Tier 2 LCTVs.
IWEM considers only human health
risks. Exposure and risk to ecological
receptors are not included.
The conceptual flow model used in
EPACMTP in conjunction with
IWEM Tier 2 data input constraints
might produce ground-water veloci-
ties that might be greater than can be
assumed based on the site-specific
hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic
gradient values. The maximum val-
ues that the velocities can reach are
limited by a model constraint that
appropriately prevents the modeled
water level from rising above the
ground surface. Despite this con-
straint, modeled velocities might be
greater than expected velocities based
on site-specific hydraulic conductivi-
ty and hydraulic gradient.
7A-34
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
The risk evaluation in IWEM is based
on the ground-water concentration of
individual waste constituents. IWEM
does not address the cumulative risk
due to simultaneous exposure to mul-
tiple constituents (although it does
use a carcinogenic risk level at the
conservative end of EPA's risk range).
IWEM is not designed for sites with
complex hydrogeology, such as frac-
tured (karst) aquifers.
The tool is inappropriate for sites
where non-aqueous phase liquid
(NAPL) contaminants are present.
IWEM does not account for all possi-
ble fate and transport processes. For
example, colloid transport might be
important at some sites but is not
considered in IWEM. While the user
can enter a constituent-specific
degradation rate constant to account
for biodegradation, IWEM simulates
biodegradation in a relatively simple
way by assuming the rate is the same
in both the unsaturated and the satu-
rated zones.
E. Tier 3: A Comprehensive
Site-Specific Evaluation
If the Tier 1 and Tier 2 evaluations do not
adequately simulate conditions at a proposed
site, or if you decide that sufficient data are
available to skip a Tier 1 or Tier 2 analysis, a
site-specific risk assessment could be consid-
ered.13 In situations involving a complex
hydrogeologic setting or other site-specific
factors that are not accounted for in IWEM, a
detailed site-specific ground-water fate and
transport analysis might be appropriate for
determining risk to ground water and evalu-
ating alternative designs or application rates.
It is recommended that you consult with the
appropriate state agency and use a qualified
Why is it important to use
a qualified professional?
• Fate and transport modeling can be
very complex; appropriate training
and experience are required to cor-
rectly use and interpret models.
• Incorrect fate and transport modeling
can result in a liner system that is not
sufficiently protective or an inappro-
priate land application rate.
• To avoid incorrect analyses, check to
see if the professional has sufficient
training and experience at analyzing
ground-water flow and contaminant
fate and transport.
professional experienced in ground-water
modeling. State officials and appropriate
trade associations might be able to suggest a
good consultant to perform the analysis.
1. How is a Tier 3 Evaluation
Performed?
A Tier 3 evaluation will generally involve a
more detailed site-specific analysis than Tier
2. Sites for which a Tier 3 evaluation might
be performed typically involve complex and
heterogeneous hydrogeology. Selection and
application of appropriate ground-water
models require a thorough understanding of
the waste and the physical, chemical, and
hydrogeologic characteristics of the site.
A Tier 3 evaluation should involve the fol-
lowing steps:
• Developing a conceptual hydrogeo-
logical model of the site.
• Selecting a flow and transport simu-
lation model.
• Applying the model to the site.
13 For example, if ground-water flow is subject to seasonal variations, use of the Tier 2 evaluation tool
might not be appropriate because the model is based on steady-state flow conditions.
7A-35
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
As with all modeling, you should consult
with the state before investing significant
resources in a site-specific analysis. The state
might have a list of preferred models and
might be able to help plan the fate and trans-
port analysis.
a. Developing a Conceptual
Hydrogeological Model
The first step in the site-specific Tier 3
evaluation is to develop a conceptual hydro-
geological model of the site. The conceptual
model should describe the key features and
characteristics to be captured in the fate and
transport modeling. A complete conceptual
hydrogeological model is important to ensure
that the fate and transport model can simu-
late the important features of the site. The
conceptual hydrogeological model should
address questions such as:
• Does a confined aquifer, an uncon-
fined aquifer, or both need to be sim-
ulated?
• Does the ground water flow through
porous media, fractures, or a combi-
nation of both?
• Is there single, or are there multiple,
hydrogeologic layers to be simulated?
• Is the hydrogeology constant or vari-
able in layer thickness?
• Are there other hydraulic sources or
sinks (e.g., extraction or injection
wells, lakes, streams, ponds)?
• What is the location of natural no-
flow boundaries and/or constant
head boundaries?
• How significant is temporal (season-
al) variation in ground-water flow
conditions? Does it require a tran-
sient flow model?
b.
What other contaminant sources are
present?
What fate processes are likely to be
significant (e.g. sorption and
biodegradation) ?
Are plume concentrations high
enough to make density effects sig-
nificant?
Selecting a Fate and Transport
Simulation Model
Numerous computer models exist to simu-
late ground-water fate and transport.
Relatively simple models are often based on
analytical solutions of the mathematical
equations governing ground-water flow and
solute transport equations. However, such
models generally cannot simulate the com-
plexities of real world sites, and for a rigor-
ous Tier 3 evaluation, numerical models
based on finite-difference or finite-element
techniques are recommended. The primary
criteria for selecting a particular model
should be that it is consistent with the char-
acteristics of the site, as described in the con-
ceptual site hydrogeological model, and that
it is able to simulate the significant processes
that control contaminant fate and transport.
In addition to evaluating whether a model
will adequately address site characteristics,
the following questions should be answered
to ensure that the model will provide accu-
rate, verifiable results:
• What is the source of the model?
How easy is it to obtain and is the
model well documented?
• Are documentation and user's manu-
als available for the model? If yes, are
they clearly written and do they pro-
vide sufficient technical background
on the mathematical formulation and
solution techniques?
7A-36
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
What are some useful resources for
selecting a ground-water fate and
transport model?
The following resources can help
select appropriate modeling software:
• Ground Water Modeling Compendium,
Second Edition (U.S. EPA, 1994c)
• Assessment Framework for Ground-
Water Modeling Applications (U.S. EPA,
1994b)
• Technical Guide to Ground-water Model
Selection at Sites Contaminated with
Radioactive Substances (U.S. EPA,
1994a)
• EPA's Center for Subsurface Modeling
Support (CSMoS—RSKERL; Ada,
Oklahoma)
• Anderson, Mary P. and William W
Woessner. Applied Groundwater
Modeling: Simulation of Flow and
Advective Transport (Academic Press,
1992)
• EPA regional offices
• Has the model been verified against
analytical solutions and other mod-
els? If yes, are the test cases available
so that a professional consultant can
test the model on his/her computer
system?
• Has the model been validated using
field data?
Table 12 provides a brief description of a
number of commonly used ground-water fate
and transport models.
c. Applying the Model to the Site
For proper application of a ground-water
flow and transport model, expertise in hydro-
geology and the principles of flow and trans-
port, as well as experience in using models
and interpreting model results are essential.
The American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) has developed guidance that might be
useful for conducting modeling. A listing of
guidance material can be found in Table 13.
The first step in applying the model to a
site is to calibrate it. Model calibration is the
process of matching model predictions to
observed data by adjusting the values of
input parameters. In the case of ground-water
modeling, the calibration is usually done by
matching predicted and observed hydraulic
head values. Calibration is important even for
well-characterized sites, because the values of
measured or estimated model parameters are
always subject to uncertainty. Calibrating the
flow model is usually achieved by adjusting
the value(s) of hydraulic conductivity and
recharge rates. In addition, if plume monitor-
ing data or tracer test data are available,
transport parameters such as dispersivity and
sorption and degradation parameters can also
be calibrated. A properly calibrated model is
a powerful tool for predicting contaminant
fate and transport. Conversely, if no calibra-
tion is performed due to lack of suitable site
data, any Tier 3 model predictions will
remain subject to considerable uncertainty.
At a minimum, a site-specific analysis
should provide estimated leachate concentra-
tions at specified downgradient points for a
proposed design. For landfills, surface
impoundments and waste piles, you should
compare these concentrations to appropriate
MCLs, health-based standards, or state stan-
dards. For land application units, if a waste
leachate concentration is below the values
specified by the state, land application might
be appropriate. Conversely, if a leachate con-
centration is above state-specified values,
land application might not be protective of
the ground water.
7A-37
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Table 12.
Example Site-Specific Ground-Water Fate and Transport Models
Model Name Description
MODFLOW
MODFLOW is a 3-D, ground-water flow model for steady state and transient simulation of
saturated flow problems in confined and unconfined aquifers. It calculates flow rates and
water balances. The model includes flow towards wells, through riverbeds, and into drains.
MODFLOW is the industry standard for ground-water modeling that was developed and
still maintained by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). MODFLOW-2000 is the
current version. MODFLOW is a public domain model; numerous pre- and post-processing
software packages are available commercially. MODFLOW can simulate ground-water flow
only. In order to simulate contaminant transport, MODFLOW must be used in conjunction
with a compatible solute transport model (MT3DMS, see below).
MODFLOW and other USGS models can be obtained from the USGS Web site at
.
MT3DMS
Modular 3-D Transport model (MT3D) is commonly used in contaminant transport model-
ing and remediation assessment studies. Originally developed for EPA, the current version is
known as MT3DMS. MT3DMS has a comprehensive set of options and capabilities for sim-
ulating advection, dispersion/diffusion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in ground-
water flow systems under general hydrogeologic conditions. MT3DMS retains the same
modular structure of the original MT3D code, similar to that implemented in MODFLOW
The modular structure of the transport model makes it possible to simulate advection, dis-
persion/diffusion, source/sink mixing, and chemical reactions separately without reserving
computer memory space for unused options. New packages involving other transport
processes and reactions can be added to the model readily without having to modify the
existing code.
NOTE: The original version of this model known as MT3D, released in 1991, was based on
a mathematical formulation which could result in mass-balance errors. This version should
be avoided.
MT3DMS is maintained at the University of Alabama, and can be obtained at:
. MT3DMS is also included, along with MODFLOW in several
commercial ground-water modeling software packages.
BIOPLUME-III
BIOPLUME-III is a 2-D, finite difference model for simulating the natural attenuation of
organic contaminants in ground water due to the processes of advection, dispersion, sorp-
tion, and biodegradation. Biotransformation processes are potentially important in the
restoration of aquifers contaminated with organic pollutants. As a result, these processes
require valuation in remedial action planning studies associated with hydrocarbon contami-
nants. The model is based on the USGS solute transport code MOC. It solves the solute
transport equation six times to determine the fate and transport of the hydrocarbons, the
electron acceptors (O2, NO3", Fe3*, SO42", and CO2), and the reaction byproducts (Fe2*). A
number of aerobic and anaerobic electron acceptors (e.g., oxygen, nitrate, sulfate, iron (III),
and carbon dioxide) have been considered in this model to simulate the biodegradation of
organic contaminants. Three different kinetic expressions can be used to simulate the aero-
bic and anaerobic biodegradation reactions.
BIOPLUME-III and other EPA supported ground-water modeling software can be obtained
via the EPA Center for Subsurface Modeling Support at the RS Kerr Environmental Research
Lab in Ada, Oklahoma: .
7A-38
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
A well-executed site-specific analysis can be
a useful instrument to anticipate and avoid
potential risks. A poorly executed site-specific
analysis, however, could over- or under-
emphasize risks, possibly leading to adverse
human health and environmental effects, or
costly cleanup liability, or it could overempha-
size risks, possibly leading to the unnecessary
expenditure of limited resources. If possible,
the model and the results of the final analyses,
including input and output parameters and
key assumptions, should be shared with
stakeholders. Chapter 1—Understanding Risk
and Building Partnerships provides a more
detailed description of activities to keep the
public informed and involved.
Table 13. ASTM Ground-Water Modeling Standards
The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Section D-18.21.10 concerns
subsurface fluid-flow (ground-water) modeling. The ASTM ground-water modeling section
is one of several task groups funded under a cooperative agreement between USGS and EPA
to develop consensus standards for the environmental industry and keep the modeling
community informed as to the progress being made in development of modeling standards.
The standards being developed by D-18.21.10 are "guides" in ASTM terminology, which
means that the content is analogous to that of EPA guidance documents. The ASTM mod-
eling guides are intended to document the state-of-the-science related to various topics in
subsurface modeling.
The following standards have been developed by D-18.21.10 and passed by ASTM.
They can be purchased from ASTM by calling 610 832-9585. To order or browse for pub-
lications, visit ASTM's Web site .
D-5447 Guide for Application of a Ground-Water Flow Model to a Site-Specific Problem
D-5490 Guide for Comparing Ground-Water Flow Model Simulations to Site-Specific
Information
D-5609 Guide for Defining Boundary Conditions in Ground-Water Flow Modeling
D-5610 Guide for Defining Initial Conditions in Ground-Water Flow Modeling
D-5611 Guide for Conducting a Sensitivity Analysis for a Ground-Water Flow Model
Application
D-5718 Guide for Documenting a Ground-Water Flow Model Application
D-5719 Guide to Simulation of Subsurface Air Flow Using Ground-Water Flow
Modeling Codes
D-5880 Guide for Subsurface Flow and Transport Modeling
D-5981 Guide for Calibrating a Ground-Water Flow Model Application
A compilation of most of the current modeling and aquifer testing standards also can be
purchased. The title of the publication is ASTM Standards on Analysis ofHydrologlc
Parameters and Ground Water Modeling, publication number 03-418096-38.
For more information by e-mail, contact service@astm.org.
7A-39
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Assessing Risk Activity List
Q Review the risk characterization tools recommended by this chapter.
Q Characterize the waste in accordance with the recommendations of Chapter 2 — Characterizing
Waste.
Q Obtain expected leachate concentrations for all relevant waste constituents.
Q If a Tier 1 evaluation is conducted, understand and use the Tier 1 Evaluation to obtain recommen-
dations for the design of your waste management unit (as noted previously you can skip the Tier 1
analysis and proceed directly to a Tier 2 or Tier 3 analysis).
Q If a design system or other measures are recommended in a Tier 1 analysis, perform a Tier 2 analy-
sis if you believe the recommendations are overly protective. Also, if data are available, you can
conduct a Tier 2 or Tier 3 analysis without conducting a Tier 1 evaluation.
Q If your site characteristics or your waste management needs are particularly complex, or do not
adequately simulate conditions reflected in a Tier 1 or Tier 2 analysis, consult with your state and a
qualified professional and consider a more detailed, site-specific Tier 3 analysis.
7A-40
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Resources
ASTM. 1996. ASTM Standards on Analysis olHydrologic Parameters and Ground Water Modeling,
Publication Number 03-418096-38.
ASTM. 1993. D-5447 Guide for Application ola Ground-Water Flow Model to a Site-Specific
Problem.
ASTM. 1993. D-5490 Guide for Comparing Ground-Water Flow Model Simulations to Site-specific
Information.
ASTM. 1994. D-5609 Guide for Defining Boundary Conditions in Ground-Water Flow Modeling.
ASTM. 1994. D-5610 Guide for Defining Initial Conditions in Ground-Water Flow Modeling.
ASTM. 1994. D-5611 Guide for Conducting a Sensitivity Analysis for a Ground-Water Flow Model
Application.
ASTM. 1994. D-5718 Guide for Documenting a Ground-Water Flow Model Application.
ASTM. 1994. D-5719 Guide to Simulation ol Subsurlace Air Flow Using Ground-Water Flow
Modeling Codes.
ASTM. 1995. D-5880 Guide for Subsurlace Flow and Transport Modeling.
ASTM. 1996. D-5981 Guide for Calibrating a Ground-Water Flow Model Application.
Bagchi, A. 1994. Design, Construction, and Monitoring ol Landfills.
Berner, E. K. and R. Berner. 1987. The Global Water Cycle: Geochemistry and Environment.
Boulding, R. 1995. Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention,
and Remediation.
Lee, C. 1992. Environmental Engineering Dictionary, 2d. Ed.
Sharma, H., and S. Lewis. 1994. Waste Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills.
Speidel, D., L. Ruedisili, and A. Agnew 1988. Perspectives on Water: Uses and Abuses.
7A-41
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Assessing Risk
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 2002a. Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model (IWEM) Technical
Background Document. EPA530-R-02-012.
U.S. EPA. 2002b. The User's Guide for the Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model.
EPA530-R- 02-013.
U.S. EPA. 2002c. EPACMTP Data/Parameters Background Document.
U.S. EPA. 2002d. EPACMTP Technical Background Document.
U.S. EPA. 1997a. Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA600-P-95-002F.
U.S. EPA. 1997b. Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analyses. EPA630-R-97-001.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. A Technical Guide to Ground-Water Model Selection at Sites Contaminated
with Radioactive Substance. EPA 4-2-R-94-012.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Assessment Framework for Ground-Water Modeling Applications. EPA500-B-
94-003.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. Ground-Water Modeling Compendium, Second Edition. EPA500-B-94-003.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Seminar Publication: Site Characterization for Subsurface Remediation.
EPA625-4-91-026.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Exposure Assessment Methods Handbook.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Selection Criteria For Mathematical Models Used In Exposure Assessments:
Ground-water Models. EPA600-8-88-075.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual.
7A-42
-------
Part IV
Protecting Ground Water
Chapter 7: Section B
Designing and Installing Liners
Technical Considerations for New Surface
Impoundments, Landfills, and Waste Piles
-------
-------
Contents
I. In-Situ Soil Liners 7B-1
II. Single Liners 7B-2
A. Compacted Clay Liners 7B-2
B. Geomembranes or Flexible Membrane Liners 7B-10
C. Geosynthetic Clay Liners 7B-17
III. Composite Liners 7B-22
IV Double Liners (Primary and Secondary Lined Systems) 7B-23
V Leachate Collection and Leak Detection Systems 7B-24
A. Leachate Collection System 7B-24
B. Leak Detection System 7B-28
C. Leachate Treatment System 7B-29
VI. Construction Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7B-29
A. Compacted Clay Liner Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7B-32
B. Geomembrane Liner Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7B-32
C. Geosynthetic Clay Liner Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7B-33
D. Leachate Collection System Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7B-34
Designing and Installing Liners Activity List 7B-36
Resources 7B-37
Appendix 7B-43
Figures:
Figure 1. Water Content for Achieving a Specific Density 7B-6
Figure 2: Two Types of Footed Rollers 7B-8
Figure 3: Four Variations of GCL Bonding Methods 7B-19
Figure 4: Typical Leachate Collection System 7B-25
Figure 5: Typical Geonet Configuration 7B-27
-------
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Designing and Installing Liners—Technical
Considerations for New Surface
Impoundments, Landfills, and Waste Piles
This chapter will help you:
• Employ liner systems where needed to protect ground water from
contamination.
• Select from clay liners, synthetic liners, composite liners, leachate
collection systems, and leak detection systems as appropriate.
• Consider technical issues carefully to ensure that the liner system
will function as designed.
Once risk has been characterized
and the most appropriate
design system is chosen, the
next step is unit design. The
Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model (IWEM), discussed in
Chapter 7, Section A—Assessing Risk can be
used to determine appropriate design system
recommendations. A critical part of this
design for new landfills, waste piles, and sur-
face impoundments is the liner system. The
liner system recommendations in the Guide
do not apply to land application units, since
such operations generally do not include a
liner system as part of their design. (For
design of land application units, refer to
Chapter 7, Section C—Designing a Land
Application Program.) You should work with
your state agency to ensure consideration of
any applicable design system requirements,
recommendations, or standard practices the
state might have. In this chapter, sections I
though IV discuss four design options—no
liner/in-situ soils, single liner, composite liner,
and double liner. Section V covers leachate
collection and leak detection systems, and
section VI discusses construction quality
assurance and quality control.
I. In-Situ Soil
Liners
For the purpose of the Guide, in-situ soil
refers to simple, excavated areas or impound-
ments, without any additional engineering
controls. The ability of natural soils to hinder
transport and reduce the concentration of
constituent levels through dilution and atten-
uation can provide sufficient protection when
the initial constituent levels in the waste
stream are very low, when the wastes are
inert, or when the hydrogeologic setting
affords sufficient protection.
What are the recommendations
for in-situ soils?
The soil below and adjacent to a waste
management unit should be suitable for con-
struction. It should provide a firm foundation
for the waste. Due to the low risk associated
with wastes being managed in these units, a
liner might not be necessary; however, it is
still helpful to review the recommended loca-
tion considerations and operating practices for
the unit.
7B-1
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
What technical issues should be
considered with the use of in-situ
soils?
In units using in-situ natural soils, con-
struction and design of an engineered liner
will not be necessary; however, there are still
technical concerns to consider. These include
the following:
• The stability of foundation soils.
• The compatibility of the waste with
native soils.
• The location where the unit will be
sited.
• The potential to recompact existing
soils.
Potential instability can occur in the foun-
dation soil, if its load-bearing capacity and
resistance to movement or consolidation are
insufficient to support the waste. The ground-
water table or a weak soil layer also can influ-
ence the stability of the unit. You should take
measures, such as designing maximum slopes,
to avoid slope failure during construction and
operation of the waste management unit. Most
soil slopes are stable at a 3:1 horizontal to ver-
tical inclination. There are common sense
operating practices to ensure that any wastes
to be managed on in-situ soils will not inap-
propriately interact with the soils. When using
in-situ soils, refer to Chapter 4—Considering
the Site. Selecting an appropriate location will
be of increased importance, since the added
barrier of an engineered liner will not be pre-
sent. Because in-situ soil can have non-homo-
geneous material, root holes, and cracks, its
performance can be improved by scarifying
and compacting the top portion of the in-situ
natural soils.
II. Single Liners
If the risk evaluation recommended the use
of a single liner, the next step is to determine
the type of single liner system most appropri-
ate for the site. The discussion below address-
es three types of single liner systems:
compacted clay liners, geomembrane liners,
and geosynthetic clay liners. Determining
which material, or combination of materials, is
important for protecting human health and
the environment.1
A. Compacted Clay Liners
A compacted clay liner can serve as a single
liner or as part of a composite or double liner
system. Compacted clay liners are composed
of natural mineral materials (natural soils),
bentonite-soil blends, and other materials
placed and compacted in layers called lifts. If
natural soils at the site contain a significant
quantity of clay, then liner materials can be
excavated from onsite locations known as bor-
row pits. Alternatively, if onsite soils do not
contain sufficient clay, clay materials can be
hauled from offsite sources, often referred to
as commercial pits.
Compacted clay liners can be designed to
work effectively as hydraulic barriers. To
ensure that compacted clay liners are well
constructed and perform as they are designed,
it is important to implement effective quality
control methods emphasizing soil investiga-
tions and construction practices. Three objec-
tives of quality assurance and quality control
for compacted soil liners are to ensure that 1)
selected liner materials are suitable, 2) liner
materials are properly placed and compacted,
and 3) the completed liner is properly protect-
ed before, during, and after construction.
Quality assurance and quality control are dis-
cussed in greater detail in section VI.
7B-2
Many industry and trade periodicals, such as Waste Age, MSW Management, Solid Waste Technologies,
and World Wastes, have articles on liner types and their corresponding costs, as well as advertisements
and lists of vendors.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
What are the thickness and
hydraulic conductivity recommen-
dations for compacted clay liners?
Compacted clay liners should be at least 2
feet thick and have a maximum hydraulic
conductivity of 1 x 1O7 cm/sec (4 x 1O8
in/sec). Hydraulic conductivity refers to the
degree of ease with which a fluid can flow
through a material. A low hydraulic conduc-
tivity will help minimize leachate migration
out of a unit. Designing a compacted clay
liner with a thickness ranging from 2 to 5 feet
will help ensure that the liner meets desired
hydraulic conductivity standards and will
also minimize leachate migration as a result
of any cracks or imperfections present in the
liner. Thicker compacted clay liners provide
additional time to minimize leachate migra-
tion prior to the clay becoming saturated.
What issues should be considered
in the design of a compacted clay
liner?
The first step in designing a compacted
clay liner is selecting the clay material. The
quality and properties of the material will
influence the performance of the liner. The
most common type of compacted soil is one
that is constructed from naturally occurring
soils that contain a significant quantity of
clay. Such soils are usually classified as CL,
CH, or SC in the Unified Soil Classification
System (USCS). Some of the factors to con-
sider in choosing a soil include soil proper-
ties, interaction with wastes, and test results
for potentially available materials.
So/7 Properties
Minimizing hydraulic conductivity is the
primary goal in constructing a soil liner.
Factors to consider are water content, plasticity
characteristics, percent fines, and percent grav-
el, as these properties affect the soil's ability to
achieve a specified hydraulic conductivity.
Hydraulic conductivity. It is important to
select compacted clay liner materials so that
remolding and compacting of the materials
will produce a low hydraulic conductivity.
Factors influencing the hydraulic conductivi-
ty at a particular site include: the degree of
compaction, compaction method, type of clay
material used, soil moisture content, and
density of the soil during liner construction.
The hydraulic conductivity of a soil also
depends on the viscosity and density of the
fluid flowing through it. Consider measuring
hydraulic conductivity using methods such as
American Society of Testing and Materials
(ASTM) D-5084.2
Water content. Water content refers to the
amount of liquid, or free water, contained in a
given amount of material. Measuring water
content can help determine whether a clay
material needs preprocessing, such as moisture
adjustment or soil amendments, to yield a
specified density or hydraulic conductivity.
Compaction curves can be used to depict
moisture and density relationships, using
either ASTM D-698 or ASTM D-1557, the
standard or modified Proctor test methods,
depending on the compaction equipment used
and the degree of firmness in the foundation
materials.3 The critical relationship between
clay soil moisture content and density is
explained thoroughly in Chapter 2 of EPAs
1993 technical guidance document Quality
ASTM D-5084, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous
Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter.
ASTM D-698, Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort
(12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)).
ASTM D-1557, Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort
(56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).
7B-3
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Assurance and Quality Control for Waste
Containment Facilities (U.S. EPA, 1993c).
Plasticity characteristics. Plasticity char-
acteristics describe a material's ability to
behave as a plastic or moldable material.
Soils containing clay are generally categorized
as plastic. Soils that do not contain clay are
non-plastic and typically considered unsuit-
able materials for compacted clay liners,
unless soil amendments such as bentonite
clay are introduced.
Plasticity characteristics are quantified by
three parameters: liquid limit, plastic limit,
and plasticity index. The liquid limit is
defined as the minimum moisture content (in
percent of oven-dried weight) at which a soil-
water mixture can flow. The plastic limit is
the minimum moisture content at which a
soil can be molded. The plasticity index is
defined as the liquid limit minus the plastic
limit and defines the range of moisture con-
tent over which a soil exhibits plastic behav-
ior. When soils with high plastic limits are
too dry during placement, they tend to form
clods, or hardened clumps, that are difficult
to break down during compaction. As a
result, preferential pathways can form around
these clumps allowing leachate to flow
through the material at a higher rate. Soil
plasticity indices typically range from 10 per-
cent to 30 percent. Soils with a plasticity
index greater than 30 percent are cohesive,
sticky, and difficult to work with in the field.
Common testing methods for plasticity char-
acteristics include the methods specified in
ASTM D-4318, also known as Atterberg lim-
its tests.4
Percent fines and percent gravel. Typical
soil liner materials contain at least 30 percent
fines and can contain up to 50 percent gravel,
by weight. Common testing methods for per-
cent fines and percent gravel are specified in
ASTM D-422, also referred to as grain size
distribution tests.5 Fines refer to silt and clay-
sized particles. Soils with less than 30 percent
fines can be worked to obtain hydraulic con-
ductivities below 1 x 10~7 cm/sec (4 x 10~8
in ./sec), but use of these soils requires more
careful construction practices.
Gravel is defined as particles unable to
pass through the openings of a Number 4
sieve, which has an opening size equal to
4.76 mm (0.2 in.). Although gravel itself has
a high hydraulic conductivity, relatively large
amounts of gravel, up to 50 percent by
weight, can be uniformly mixed with clay
materials without significantly increasing the
hydraulic conductivity of the material. Clay
materials fill voids created between gravel
particles, thereby creating a gravel-clay mix-
ture with a low hydraulic conductivity. As
long as the percent gravel in a compacted
clay mixture remains below 50 percent, cre-
ating a uniform mixture of clay and gravel,
where clay can fill in gaps, is more critical
than the actual gravel content of the mixture.
You should pay close attention to the per-
cent gravel in cases where a compacted clay
liner functions as a bottom layer to a geosyn-
thetic, as gravel can cause puncturing in
geosynthetic materials. Controlling the maxi-
mum particle size and angularity of the grav-
el should help prevent puncturing, as well as
prevent gravel from creating preferential flow
paths. Similar to gravel, soil particles or rock
fragments also can create preferential flow
paths. To help prevent the development of
preferential pathways and an increased
hydraulic conductivity, it is best to use soil
liner materials where the soil particles and
rock fragments are typically small (e.g., 3/4
inch in diameter).
Interactions With Waste
Waste placed in a unit can interact with
compacted clay liner materials, thereby influ-
encing soil properties such as hydraulic con-
7B-4
4 ASTM D-4318, Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.
5 ASTM D-422, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
ductivity and permeability. Two ways that
waste materials can influence the hydraulic
conductivity of the liner materials are
through dissolution of soil minerals and
changes in clay structure. Soil minerals can
be dissolved, or reduced to liquid form, as a
result of interaction with acids and bases. For
example, aluminum and iron in the soil can
be dissolved by acids, and silica can be dis-
solved by bases. While some plugging of soil
pores by dissolved minerals can lower
hydraulic conductivity in the short term, the
creation of piping and channels over time can
lead to an increased hydraulic conductivity in
the long term. The interaction of waste and
clay materials can also cause the creation of
positive ions, or cations. The presence of
cations such as sodium, potassium, calcium,
and magnesium can change the clay struc-
ture, thereby influencing the hydraulic con-
ductivity of the liner. Depending on the
cation type and the clay mineral, an increased
presence of such cations can cause the clay
minerals to form clusters and increase the
permeability of the clay. Therefore, before
selecting a compacted clay liner material, it is
important to develop a good understanding
of the composition of the waste that will be
placed in the waste management unit. EPA's
Method 9100, in publication SW-846, mea-
sures the hydraulic conductivity of soil sam-
ples before and after exposure to permeants.6
Locating and Testing Material
Although the selection process for com-
pacted clay liner construction materials can
vary from project to project, some common
material selection steps include locating and
testing materials at a potential borrow or
commercial pit before construction, and
observing and testing material performance
throughout construction. First, investigate a
potential borrow or commercial pit to deter-
mine the volume of materials available. The
next step is to test a representative sample of
soil to determine material properties such as
plasticity characteristics, percent gravel, and
percent fines. To confirm the suitability of the
materials once construction begins, you
should consider requesting that representa-
tive samples from the materials in the borrow
or commercial pit be tested periodically after
work has started.
Material selection steps will vary, depend-
ing on the origin of the materials for the pro-
ject. For example, if a commercial pit provides
the materials, locating an appropriate onsite
borrow pit is not necessary. In addition to the
tests performed on the material, it is recom-
mended that a qualified inspector make visual
observations throughout the construction
process to ensure that harmful materials, such
as stones or other large matter, are not present
in the liner material.
What issues should be considered
in the construction of a liner and
the operation of a unit?
You should develop test pads to demon-
strate construction techniques and material
performance on a small scale. During unit con-
struction and operation, some additional fac-
tors influencing the performance of the liner
include: preprocessing, subgrade preparation,
method of compaction, and protection against
desiccation and cracking. Each of these steps,
from preprocessing through protection against
desiccation and cracking, should be repeated
for each lift or layer of soil.
Test Pads
Preparing a test pad for the compacted
clay liner helps verify that the materials and
methods proposed will yield a liner that
meets the desired hydraulic conductivity. A
test pad also provides an opportunity to
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods.
7B-5
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
demonstrate the performance of alternative
materials or methods of construction. A test
pad should be constructed with the soil liner
materials proposed for a particular project,
using the same preprocessing procedures,
compaction equipment, and construction
practices proposed for the actual liner. A
complete discussion of test pads (covering
dimensions, materials, and construction) can
be found in Chapter 2 of EPAs 1993 techni-
cal guidance document Quality Assurance and
Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities
(U.S. EPA, 1993c). A discussion of commonly
used methods to measure in-situ hydraulic
conductivity is also contained in that chapter.
Preprocessing
Although some liner
materials can be ready
for use in construction
immediately after they
are excavated, many
materials will require
some degree of prepro-
cessing. Preprocessing
methods include: water
content adjustment,
removal of oversized
particles, pulverization
of any clumps, homoge-
nization of the soils, and
introduction of addi-
tives, such as bentonite.
Water content
adjustment. For natural
soils, the degree of satu-
ration of the soil liner at
the time of compaction,
known as molding water
content, influences the
engineering properties of
the compacted material.
Soils compacted at water
contents less than opti-
mum tend to have a relatively high hydraulic
conductivity. Soils compacted at water con-
tents greater than optimum tend to have low
hydraulic conductivity and low strength.
Proper soil water content revolves around
achieving a minimum dry density, which is
expressed as a percentage of the soil's maxi-
mum dry density. The minimum dry density
typically falls in the range of 90 to 95 percent
of the soil's maximum dry density value. From
the minimum dry density range, the required
water content range can be calculated, as
shown in Figure 1. In this example the soil
has a maximum dry density of 115 Ib/cu ft.
Based upon a required minimum dry density
value of 90 percent of maximum dry density,
Figure 1.
Water Content for Achieving a Specific Density
130
120
110
"ilOO
u
'90
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
which is equal to 103.5 Ib/cu ft, the required
water content ranges from 10 to 28 percent.
It is less problematic to compact clay soil
at the lower end of the required water con-
tent range because it is easier to add water to
the clay soil than to remove it. Thus, if pre-
cipitation occurs during construction of a site
which is being placed at the lower end of the
required water content range, the additional
water might not result in a soil water content
greater than the required range. Conversely, if
the site is being placed at the upper end of
the range, for example at 25 percent, any
additional moisture will be excessive, result-
ing in water content over 28 percent and
making the 90 percent maximum dry density
unattainable. Under such conditions con-
struction should halt while the soil is aerated
and excess moisture is allowed to evaporate.
Removal of oversized particles.
Preprocessing clay materials, to remove cob-
bles or large stones that exceed the maximum
allowable particle size, can improve the soil's
compactibility and protect any adjacent
geomembrane from puncture. Particle size
should be small (e.g., 3/4 inch in diameter)
for compaction purposes. If a geomembrane
will be placed over the compacted clay, only
the upper lift of clay needs to address con-
cerns regarding puncture resistance.
Observation by quality assurance and quality
control personnel is the most effective
method to identify areas where oversized par-
ticles need to be removed. Cobbles and
stones are not the only materials that can
interfere with compactive efforts. Chunks of
dry, hard clay, also known as clods, often
need to be broken into smaller pieces to be
properly hydrated, remolded, and compact-
ed. In wet clay, clods are less of a concern
since wet clods can often be remolded with a
reasonable compactive effort.
Soil amendments. If the soils at a unit do
not have a sufficient percentage of clay, a com-
mon practice is to blend bentonite with them
to reduce the hydraulic conductivity. Bentonite
is a clay mineral that expands when it comes
into contact with water. Relatively small
amounts of bentonite, on the order of 5 to 10
percent, can be added to sand or other nonco-
hesive soils to increase the cohesion of the
material and reduce hydraulic conductivity.
Sodium bentonite is a common additive
used to amend soils. However, this additive is
vulnerable to degradation as a result of con-
tact with certain chemicals and waste
leachates. Calcium bentonite, a more perme-
able material than sodium bentonite, is anoth-
er common additive used to amend soils.
Approximately twice as much calcium ben-
tonite is needed to achieve a hydraulic con-
ductivity comparable to that of sodium
bentonite. Amended soil mixtures generally
require mixing in a pug mill, cement mixer, or
other mixing equipment that allows water to
be added during the mixing process.
Throughout the mixing and placement
processes, water content, bentonite content,
and particle distribution should be controlled.
Other materials that can be used as soil addi-
tives include lime cement and other clay min-
erals, such as atapulgite. It can be difficult to
mix additives thoroughly with cohesive soils,
or clays; the resultant mixture might not
achieve the desired level of hydraulic conduc-
tivity throughout the entire liner.
Subgrade Preparation
It is important to ensure that the subgrade
on which a compacted clay liner will be con-
structed is properly prepared. When a com-
pacted clay liner is the lowest component of a
liner system, the subgrade consists of native
soil or rock. Subgrade preparation for these
systems involves compacting the native soil
to remove any soft spots and adding water to
or removing water from the native soil to
obtain a specified firmness. Alternatively, in
7B-7
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
some cases, the compacted clay liner can be
placed on top of a geosynthetic material, such
as a geotextile. In such cases, subgrade prepa-
ration involves ensuring the smoothness of
the geosynthetic on which the clay liner will
be placed and the conformity of the geosyn-
thetic material to the underlying material.
Compaction
The main purpose of compaction is to
density the clay materials by breaking and
remolding clods of material into a uniform
mass. Since amended soils usually do not
develop clumps, the primary objective of
compaction for such materials is to increase
the material's density. Proper compaction of
liner materials is essential to ensure that a
compacted clay liner meets specified
hydraulic conductivity standards. Factors
influencing the effectiveness of compaction
efforts include: the type of equipment select-
ed, the number of passes made over the
materials by such equipment, the lift thick-
ness, and the bonding between the lifts.
Molding water content, described earlier
under preprocessing, is another factor influ-
encing the effectiveness of compaction.
Type of equipment. Factors to consider
when selecting compaction equipment
include: the type and weight of the com-
pactor, the characteristics of any feet on the
drum, and the weight of the roller per unit
length of drummed surface. Heavy com-
pactors, weighing more than 50,000 pounds,
with feet long enough to penetrate a loose lift
of soil, are often the best types of compactor
for clay liners. For bentonite-soil mixtures, a
footed roller might not be appropriate. For
these mixtures, where densification of the
material is more important than kneading or
remolding it to meet low hydraulic conduc-
tivity specifications, a smooth-drum roller or
a rubber- tired roller might produce better
results. Figure 2 depicts two types of footed
rollers, a fully penetrating footed roller and a
partially-penetrating footed roller.
Figure 2 Two Types of Footed Rollers
Roller with
Partly
Penetrating
Feet
Roller with
Fully Penetrating
Feet
Fully Penetrating Feet on Roller
Compact Base of New, Loose Lift
of Soil into Surface of Old, Previously
Compacted Lift
Partly Penetrating Feet on Roller Do
Not Fjctend to Base of New, Loose
Lift of Soil and Do Not Compact New
Lift into Surface of Old Lift
Source: U.S. EPA, 1993c
7B-8
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
For placement of liners on side slopes,
consider the angle and length of the slope.
Placing continuous lifts on a gradually
inclined slope will provide better continuity
between the bottom and sidewalls of the
liner. Since continuous lifts might be impossi-
ble to construct on steeper slopes due to the
difficulties of operating heavy compaction
equipment on these slopes, materials might
need to be placed and compacted in horizon-
tal lifts. When sidewalls are compacted hori-
zontally, it is important to avoid creating
seepage planes, by securely connecting the
edges of the horizontal lift with the bottom of
the liner. Because the lift needs to be wide
enough to accommodate compaction equip-
ment, the thickness of the horizontal lift is
often greater than the thickness specified in
the design. In such cases, you should consid-
er trimming soil material from the construct-
ed side slopes and sealing the trimmed
surface using a sealed drum roller.
It is common for contractors to use several
different types of compaction equipment dur-
ing liner construction. Initial lifts might need
the use of a footed roller to fully penetrate a
loose lift. Final lifts also might need the use
of a footed roller for compaction, however,
they might be formed better by using a
smooth roller after the lift has been compact-
ed to smooth the surface of the lift in prepa-
ration for placement of an overlying
geomembrane.
Number of passes. The number of passes
made by a compactor over clay materials can
influence the overall hydraulic conductivity
of the liner. The minimum number of passes
that is reasonable depends on a variety of
site-specific factors and cannot be general-
ized. In some cases, where a minimum cover-
age is specified, it might be possible to
calculate the minimum number of passes to
meet such a specification. At least 5 to 15
passes with a compactor over a given point
are usually necessary to remold and compact
clay liner materials thoroughly.
An equipment pass can be defined as one
pass of the compaction equipment or as one
pass of a drum over a given area of soil. It is
important to clearly define what is meant by
a pass in any quality assurance or quality
control plans. It does not matter which defin-
ition is agreed upon, as long as the definition
is used consistently throughout the project.
Lift thickness. You should determine the
appropriate thickness (as measured before
compaction) of each of the several lifts that
will make up the clay liner. The initial thick-
ness of a loose lift will affect the compactive
effort needed to reach the lower portions of
the lift. Thinner lifts allow compactive efforts
to reach the bottom of a lift and provide
greater assurance that compaction will be suf-
ficient to allow homogenous bonding
between subsequent lifts. Loose lift thickness-
es typically range between 13 and 25 cm (5
and 10 in.). Factors influencing lift thickness
are: soil characteristics, compaction equip-
ment, firmness of the foundation materials,
and the anticipated compaction necessary to
meet hydraulic conductivity requirements.
Bonding between lifts. Since it is
inevitable that some zones of higher and
lower hydraulic conductivity, also known as
preferential pathways, will be present within
each lift, lifts should be joined or bonded in a
way that minimizes extending these zones or
pathways between lifts. If good bonding is
achieved, the preferential pathways will be
truncated by the bonded zone between the
lifts. At least two recommended methods
exist for preparing proper bonds. The first
method involves kneading, or blending the
new lift with the previously compacted lift
using a footed roller. Using a roller with feet
long enough to fully penetrate through the
top lift and knead the previous lift improves
the quality of the bond. A second method
7B-9
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
involves using a disc harrow or similar equip-
ment to scarify, or roughen, and wet the top
inch of the recently placed lift, prior to plac-
ing the next lift.
Protection Against Desiccation and
Cracking
You should consider how to protect com-
pacted clay liners against desiccation and
freezing during and after construction.
Protection against desiccation is important,
because clay soil shrinks as it dries. Depend-
ing on the extent of shrinkage, it can crack.
Deep cracks, extending through more than
one lift, can cause problems. You should
measure water content to determine whether
desiccation is occurring.
There are several ways to protect compact-
ed clay liners from desiccation. One preven-
tive measure is to smooth roll the surface with
a steel drummed roller to produce a thin,
dense skin of soil; this layer can help mini-
mize the movement of water into or out of the
compacted material. Another option is to wet
the clay periodically in a uniform manner;
however, it is important to make sure to avoid
creating areas of excessive wetness. A third
measure involves covering compacted clay
liner materials with a sheet of white or clear
plastic or tarp to help prevent against desicca-
tion and cracking. The cover should be
weighted down with sandbags or other mater-
ial to minimize exposure of the underlying
materials to air. Using a light-colored plastic
will help prevent overheating, which can dry
out the clay materials. If the clay liner is not
being covered with a geosynthetic, another
method to prevent desiccation involves cover-
ing the clay with a layer of protective cover
soil or intentionally overbuilding the clay liner
and shaving it down to liner grade.
Protection against freezing is another
important consideration, because freezing can
increase the hydraulic conductivity of a liner.
It is important to avoid construction during
freezing weather. If freezing does occur and
the damage affects only a shallow depth, the
liner can be repaired by rerolling the surface.
If deeper freezing occurs, the repairs might
be more complicated. For a general guide to
frost depths, see Figure 1 of Chapter 11—
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care.
B. Geomembranes or
Flexible Membrane Liners
Geomembranes or flexible membrane lin-
ers are used to contain or prevent waste con-
stituents and leachate from escaping a waste
management unit. Geomembranes are made
by combining one or more plastic polymers
with ingredients such as carbon black, pig-
ments, fillers, plasticizers, processing aids,
crosslinking chemicals, anti-degradants, and
biocides. A wide range of plastic resins are
used for geomembranes, including high den-
sity polyethylene (HOPE), linear low density
polyethylene (LLDPE), low density linear
polyethlene (LDLPE), very low density poly-
ethlene (VLDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
flexible polypropylene (fPP), chlorosulfonated
polyethylene (CSPE or Hypalon), and ethyl-
ene propylene diene termonomer (EPDM).
Most manufacturers produce geomembranes
through extrusion or calendering. In the
extrusion process, a molten polymer is
stretched into a nonreinforced sheet; extrud-
ed geomembranes are usually made of HDPE
and LLDPE. During the calendering process,
a heated polymeric compound is passed
through a series of rollers. In this process, a
geomembrane can be reinforced with a
woven fabric or fibers. Calendered geomem-
branes are usually made of PVC and CSPE.
7B-10
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
What are the thickness recommen-
dations for geomembrane liners?
Geomembranes range in thicknesses from 20
to 120 mil (1 mil = 0.001 in.). A good design
should include a minimum thickness ol 30 mil,
except lor HDPE liners, which should have a
minimum thickness ol 60 mil. These recom-
mended minimum thicknesses ensure that the
liner material will withstand the stress ol con-
struction and the weight load ol the waste, and
allow adequate seaming to bind separate
geomembrane panels. Reducing the potential
for tearing or puncture, through proper con-
struction and quality control, is essential for a
geomembrane to perform effectively.
What issues should be considered
in the design of a geomembrane
liner?
Several factors to address in the design
include: determining appropriate material
properties and testing to ensure these proper-
ties are met, understanding how the liner will
interact with the intended waste stream,
accounting for all stresses imposed by the
design, and ensuring adequate friction.
Material Properties and Selection
When designing a geomembrane liner, you
should examine several properties of the
geomembrane material in addition to thick-
ness, including: tensile behavior, tear resis-
tance, puncture resistance, susceptibility to
environmental stress cracks, ultraviolet resis-
tance, and carbon black content.
Tensile behavior. Tensile behavior refers to
the tensile strength of a material and its ability
to elongate under strain. Tensile strength is the
ability of a material to resist pulling stresses
without tearing. The tensile properties of a
geomembrane must be sufficient to satisfy the
stresses anticipated during its service life.
These stresses include the self-weight of the
geomembrane and any down drag caused by
waste settlement on side slope liners.
Puncture and tear resistance.
Geomembrane liners can be subject to tearing
during installation due to high winds or han-
dling. Puncture resistance is also important to
consider since geomembranes are often
placed above or below materials that might
have jagged or angular edges. For example,
geomembranes might be installed above a
granular drainage system that includes gravel.
Susceptibility to environmental stress
cracks. Environmental factors can cause
cracks or failures before a liner is stressed to
its manufactured strength. These imperfec-
tions, referred to as environmental stress
cracks, often occur in areas where a liner has
been scratched or stressed by fatigue. These
cracks can also result in areas where excess
surface wetting agents have been applied. In
surface impoundments, where the geomem-
brane liner has greater exposure to the atmos-
phere and temperature changes, such
exposure can increase the potential for envi-
ronmental stress cracking.
Ultraviolet resistance. Ultraviolet resis-
tance is another factor to consider in the
design of geomembrane liners, especially in
cases where the liner might be exposed to
ultraviolet radiation for prolonged periods of
time. In such cases, which often occur in sur-
face impoundments, ultraviolet radiation can
cause degradation and cracking in the
geomembrane. Adding carbon black or other
additives during the manufacturing process
can increase a geomembrane's ultraviolet
resistance. Backfilling over the exposed
geomembrane also works to prevent degrada-
tion due to ultraviolet radiation.
Interactions With Waste
Since the main purpose of a geomembrane
is to provide a barrier and prevent contami-
7B-11
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
nants from penetrating through the geomem-
brane, chemical resistance is a critical consid-
eration. Testing for chemical resistance might
be warranted depending on the type, vol-
umes, and characteristics of waste managed
at a particular unit and the type of geomem-
brane to be used. An established method for
testing the chemical resistance of geomem-
branes, EPA Method 9090, can be found in
SW-846. ASTM has also adopted standards
for testing the chemical compatibility of vari-
ous geosynthetics, including geomembranes,
with leachates from waste management units.
ASTM D-5747 provides a standard for testing
the chemical compatibility of
geomembranes.7
Stresses Imposed by Liner Design
A liner design should take into account the
stresses imposed on the liner by the design
configuration. These stresses include: the dif-
ferential settlement in foundation soil, strain
requirements at the anchor trench, strain
requirements over long, steep side slopes,
stresses resulting from compaction, and seis-
mic stresses. Often an anchor trench designed
to secure the geomembrane during construc-
tion is prepared along the perimeter of a unit
cell. This action can help prevent the
geomembrane from slipping down the interi-
or side slopes. Trench designs should include
a depth of burial sufficient to hold the speci-
fied length of liner. If forces larger than the
tensile strength of the liner are inadvertently
developed, then the liner could tear. For this
reason, the geomembrane liner should be
allowed to slip or give in the trench after con-
struction to prevent such tearing. To help
reduce unnecessary stresses in the liner de-
sign, it is advisable to avoid using horizontal
seams. For more information on design stress-
es, consult Geosynthetic Guidance for
Hazardous Waste Landfill Cells and Surface
Impoundments (U.S. EPA, 1987).
Designing for Adequate Friction
Adequate friction between the geomem-
brane liner and the soil subgrade, as well as
between any geosynthetic components, is
necessary to prevent extensive slippage or
sloughing on the slopes of a unit. Design
equations for such components should evalu-
ate: 1) the ability of a liner to support its own
weight on side slopes, 2) the ability of a liner
to withstand down-dragging during and after
waste placement, 3) the best anchorage con-
figuration for the liner, 4) the stability of soil
cover on top of a liner, and 5) the stability of
other geosynthetic components, such as geot-
extiles or geonets, on top of a liner. An evalu-
ation of these issues can affect the choice of
geomembrane material, polymer type, fabric
reinforcement, thickness, and texture neces-
sary to achieve the design requirements.
Interface strengths can be significantly
improved by using textured geomembranes.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the construction of a
geomembrane liner?
When preparing to construct a geomem-
brane liner, you should plan appropriate
shipment and handling procedures, perform
testing prior to construction, prepare the
subgrade, consider temperature effects, and
account for wind effects. In addition, you
should select a seaming process, determine a
material for and method of backfilling, and
plan for testing during construction.
Shipment, Handling, and Site Storage
You should follow quality assurance and
quality control procedures to ensure proper
handling of geomembranes. Different types of
geomembrane liners require different types of
packaging for shipment and storage.
Typically a geomembrane manufacturer will
provide specific instructions outlining the
7 ASTM D-5747, Practice for Tests to Evaluate the Chemical Resistance of Geomembranes to Liquids.
7B-12
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
handling, storage, and construction specifica-
tions for a product. In general, HDPE and
LLDPE geomembrane liners are packaged in a
roll form, while PVC and CSPE-R liners
(CSPE-R refers to a CSPE geomembrane liner
reinforced with a fabric layer) are packaged in
panels, accordion-folded in two directions,
and placed onto pallets. Whether the liner is
shipped in rolls or panels, you should pro-
vide for proper storage. The rolls and panels
should be packaged so that fork lifts or other
equipment can safely transport them. For
rolls, this involves preparing the roll to have a
sufficient inside diameter so that a fork lift
with a long rod, known as a stinger, can be
used for lifting and moving. For accordion
panels, proper packaging involves using a
structurally-sound pallet, wrapping panels in
treated cardboard or plastic wrapping to pro-
tect against ultraviolet exposure, and using
banding straps with appropriate cushioning.
Once the liners have been transported to the
site, the rolls or panels can be stored until the
subgrade or subbase (either natural soils or
another geosynthetic) is prepared.
Subgrade Preparation
Before a geomembrane liner is installed,
you should prepare the subgrade or subbase.
The subgrade material should meet specified
grading, moisture content, and density
requirements. In the case of a soil subgrade,
it is important to prevent construction equip-
ment used to place the liner from deforming
the underlying materials. If the underlying
materials are geosynthetics, such as geonets
or geotextiles, you should remove all folds
and wrinkles before the liner is placed. For
further information on geomembrane place-
ment, see Chapter 3 of EPA's Technical
Guidance Document: Quality Assurance and
Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities
(U.S. EPA, 1993c).
Testing Prior to Construction
Before any construction begins, is it recom-
mended that you test both the geomembrane
materials from the manufacturer and the
installation procedures. Acceptance and con-
formance testing is used to evaluate the per-
formance of the manufactured geomembranes.
Constructing test strips can help evaluate how
well the intended construction process and
quality control procedures will work.
Acceptance and conformance testing.
You should perform acceptance and confor-
mance testing on the geomembrane liner
received from the manufacturer to determine
whether the materials meet the specifications
requested. While the specific ASTM test
methods vary depending on geomembrane
type, recommended acceptance and confor-
mance testing for geomembranes includes
evaluations of thickness, tensile strength and
elongation, and puncture and tear resistance
testing, as appropriate. For most geomem-
brane liner types, the recommended ASTM
method for testing thickness is ASTM D-
5199.8 For measuring the thickness of tex-
tured geomembranes, you should use ASTM
D-5994.9 For tensile strength and elongation,
ASTM D-638 is recommended for the HDPE
and LLDPE sheets, while ASTM D-882 and
ASTM D-751 are recommended for PVC and
CSPE geomembranes, respectively10 Puncture
resistance testing is typically recommended
for HDPE and LLDPE geomembranes using
ASTM D-4833.11 To evaluate tear resistance
for HDPE, LLDPE, and PVC geomembrane
8 ASTM D-5199, Standard Test Method for Measuring Nominal Thickness of Geotextiles and
Geomembranes.
9 ASTM D-5994, Measuring Core Thickness of Textured Geomembranes.
10 ASTM D-638, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics.
ASTM D-882, Standard Test Methods for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting.
ASTM D-751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics.
11 ASTM D-4833, Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles, Geomembranes,
and Related Products.
7B-13
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
liners, the recommended testing method is
ASTM D-1004, Die C.12 For CSPE-R
geomembranes, ply adhesion is more of a
concern than tear or puncture resistance and
can be evaluated using ASTM D-413,
Machine Method, Type A.13
Test strips. In preparation for liner place-
ment and field seaming, you should develop
test strips and trial seams as part of the con-
struction process. Construction of such sam-
ples should be performed in a manner that
reproduces all aspects of field production.
Providing an opportunity to test seaming
methods and workmanship helps ensure that
the quality of the seams remains constant
and meets specifications throughout the
entire seaming process.
Temperature Effects
Liner material properties can be altered by
extreme temperatures. High temperatures can
cause geomembrane liner surfaces to stick
together, a process commonly referred to as
blocking. On the other hand, low tempera-
ture can cause the liner to crack when
unrolled or unfolded. Recommended maxi-
mum and minimum allowable sheet tempera-
tures for unrolling or unfolding geomembrane
liners are 50°C (122°F) and 0°C (32°F),
respectively. In addition to sticking and crack-
ing, extreme temperatures can cause geomem-
branes to contract or expand. Polyethylene
geomembranes expand when heated and con-
tract when cooled. Other geomembranes can
contract slightly when heated. Those respon-
sible for placing the liner should take temper-
ature effects into account as they place, seam,
and backfill in the field.
Wind Effects
It is recommended that you take measures
to protect geomembrane liners from wind
damage. Windy conditions can increase the
potential for tearing as a result of uplift. If
wind uplift is a potential problem, panels can
be weighted down with sand bags.
Seaming Processes
Once panels or rolls have been placed,
another critical step involves field-seaming
the separate panels or rolls together. The
selected seaming process, such as thermal or
chemical seaming, will depend on the chemi-
cal composition of the liner. To ensure the
integrity of the seam, you should use the
seaming method recommended by the manu-
facturer. Thermal seaming uses heat to bond
together the geomembrane panels. Examples
of thermal seaming processes include extru-
sion welding and thermal fusion (or melt
bonding). Chemical seaming involves the use
of solvents, cement, or an adhesive. Chemical
seaming processes include chemical fusion
and adhesive seaming. For more information
on seaming methods, Technical Guidance
Document: Inspection Techniques for the
Fabrication of Geomembrane Field Seams (U.S.
EPA, 199 Ic), contains a full chapter on each
of the traditional seaming methods and addi-
tional discussion of emerging techniques,
such as ultrasonic, electrical conduction, and
magnetic energy source methods.
Consistent quality in fabricating field
seams is paramount to liner performance.
Conditions that could affect seaming should
be monitored and controlled during installa-
tion. Factors influencing seam construction
and performance include: ambient tempera-
ture, relative humidity, wind uplift, changes
in geomembrane temperature, subsurface
water content, type of supporting surface
used, skill of the seaming crew, quality and
consistency of chemical or welding materials,
preparation of liner surfaces to be joined,
moisture at the seam interface, and cleanli-
ness of the seam interface.
12 ASTM D-1004, Standard Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Sheeting.
13 ASTM D-413, Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property-Adhesion to Flexible Substrate.
7B-14
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
To help control some of these factors, no
more than the amount of sheeting that can be
used during a shift or a work day should be
deployed at one time. To prevent erosion of
the underlying soil surface or washout of the
geomembrane, proper storm water control
measures should be employed. Ambient tem-
perature can become a concern, if the
geomembrane liner has a high percentage of
carbon black. Although the carbon black will
help to prevent damage resulting from ultra-
violet radiation, because its dark color
absorbs heat, it can increase the ambient tem-
perature of the geomembrane, making instal-
lation more complicated. To avoid surface
moisture or high subsurface water content,
geomembranes should not be deployed when
the subgrade is wet.
Regardless of how well a geomembrane
liner is designed, its ability to meet perfor-
mance standards depends on proper quality
assurance and quality control during installa-
tion. Geomembrane sheets and seams are
subject to tearing and puncture during instal-
lation; punctures or tears can result from con-
tact with jagged edges or underlying materials
or by applying stresses greater than the
geomembrane sheet can handle. Proper quali-
ty assurance and quality control can help
minimize the occurrence of pinhole or seam
leaks. For example, properly preparing the
underlying layer and ensuring that the gravel
is of an acceptable size reduces the potential
for punctures.
Protection and Backfilling
Geomembrane liners that can be damaged
by exposure to weather or work activities
should be covered with a layer of soil or a
geosynthetic as soon as possible after quality
assurance activities associated with geomem-
brane testing are completed. If the backfill
layer is a soil material, it will typically be a
drainage material like sand or gravel. If the
cover layer is a geosynthetic, it will typically
be a geonet or geocomposite drain placed
directly over the geomembrane. Careful
placement of backfill materials is critical to
avoid puncturing or tearing the geomem-
brane material.
For soil covers, three considerations deter-
mine the amount of slack to be placed in the
underlying geomembrane. These considera-
tions include selecting the appropriate type of
soil, using the proper type of equipment, and
establishing a placement procedure for the
soil. When selecting a soil for backfilling,
characteristics to consider include particle
size, hardness, and angularity, as each of these
can affect the potential for tearing or punctur-
ing the liner. To prevent wrinkling, soil covers
should be placed over the geomembrane in
such a way that construction vehicles do not
drive directly on the liner. Care should be
taken not to push heavy loads of soil over the
geomembrane in a continuous manner.
Forward pushing can cause localized wrinkles
to develop and overturn in the direction of
movement. Overturned wrinkles create sharp
creases and localized stress in the liner and
can lead to premature failure. A recommend-
ed method for placing soil involves continual-
ly placing small amounts of soil or drainage
material and working outward over the toe of
the previously placed material.
Another recommended method involves
placing soil over the liner with a large back-
hoe and spreading it with a bulldozer or sim-
ilar equipment. If a predetermined amount of
slack is to be placed in the geomembrane, the
temperature of the liner becomes an impor-
tant factor, as it will effect the ability of the
liner to contract and expand. Although the
recommended methods for covering
geomembrane liners with soil can take more
time than backfilling with larger amounts of
soil, these methods are designed to prevent
damage caused by covering the liner with too
7B-15
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
much soil too quickly. In the long run, pre-
venting premature liner failure can be faster
and more cost-effective than having to repair
a damaged liner.
The types of geosynthetics that are often
used as protective covering include geotex-
tiles and geonets. Geogrids and drainage geo-
composites can be used for cover soil
reinforcement on slopes. The appendix at the
end of this chapter provides additional infor-
mation on geosynthetic materials. For
geosynthetic protective covers, as with soil
backfilling, to prevent tearing or puncturing,
most construction vehicles should not be
permitted to move directly on the geomem-
brane. Some possible exceptions include
small, 4-wheel, all terrain vehicles or other
types of low ground pressure equipment.
Even with these types of vehicles, drivers
should take extreme care to avoid move-
ments, such as sudden starts, stops, and
turns, which can damage the geomembrane.
Seaming-related equipment should be
allowed on the geomembrane liner, as long as
it does not damage the liner. Geosynthetic
materials are placed directly on the liner and
are not bonded to it.
Testing During Construction
Testing during construction enables assess-
ment of the integrity of the seams connecting
the geomembrane panels. Tests performed on
the geomembrane seams are categorized as
either destructive or nondestructive.
Destructive testing. Destructive testing
refers to removing a sample from the liner
seam or sheet and performing tests on the
sample. For liner seams, destructive testing
includes shear testing and peel testing; for
liner sheets, it involves tensile testing. While
quality control procedures often require
destructive testing prior to construction, in
order to ensure that the installed seams and
sheets meet performance standards, destruc-
tive testing should be performed during con-
struction also. For increased quality assur-
ance, it is recommended that peel and shear
tests on samples from the installed geomem-
brane be performed by an independent labo-
ratory. Testing methods for shear testing, peel
testing, and tensile testing vary for different
geomembrane liner types.
Determining the number of samples to
take is a difficult step. Taking too few sam-
ples results in a poor statistical representation
of the geomembrane quality. On the other
hand, taking too many samples requires
additional costs and increases the potential
for defects. Defects can result from the repair
patches used to cover the areas from which
samples were taken.
A common sampling strategy is "fixed
increment sampling" where samples are
taken at a fixed increment along the length of
the geomembrane. Increments range from 80
to 300 m (250 to 1,000 ft). The type of
welding, such as extrusion or fusion welding,
used to connect the seams and the type of
geomembrane liner can also help determine
the appropriate sampling interval. For exam-
ple, extrusion seams on HOPE require grind-
ing prior to welding and if extensive grinding
occurs, the strength of the HOPE might
decrease. In such cases, sampling at closer
intervals, such as 90 to 120 m (300 to 400
ft), might provide a more accurate descrip-
tion of material properties. If the seam is a
dual hot edge seam, both the inner and outer
seams might need to be sampled and tested.
If test results for the seam or sheet samples
do not meet the acceptance criteria for the
destructive tests, you should continue testing
the area surrounding the rejected sample to
determine the limits of the low quality seam.
Once the area of low quality has been identi-
fied, then corrective measures, such as seaming
a cap over the length of the seam or reseaming
the affected area, might be necessary.
7B-16
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Nondestructive testing. Unlike destruc-
tive tests, which examine samples taken from
the geomembrane liner in the containment
area, nondestructive tests are designed to
evaluate the integrity of larger portions of
geomembrane seams without removing pieces
of the geomembrane for testing. Common
nondestructive testing methods include: the
probe test, air lance, vacuum box, ultrasonic
methods (pulse echo, shadow, and impedance
planes), electrical spark test, pressurized dual
seam, and electrical resistivity. You should
select the test method most appropriate for
the material and seaming method. If sections
of a seam fail to meet the acceptable criteria
of the appropriate nondestructive test, then
those sections need to be delineated and
patched, reseamed, or retested. If repairing
such sections results in large patches or areas
of reseaming, then destructive test methods
are recommended to verify the integrity of
such pieces.
C. Geosynthetic Clay Liners
If a risk evaluation recommended the use
of a single liner, another option to consider is
a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL). GCLs are fac-
tory-manufactured, hydraulic barriers typical-
ly consisting of bentonite clay (or other very
low permeability materials), supported by
geotextiles or geomembranes held together by
needling, stitching, or chemical adhesives.
GCLs can be used to augment or replace
compacted clay liners or geomembranes, or
they can be used in a composite manner to
augment the more traditional compacted clay
or geomembrane materials. GCLs are typical-
ly used in areas where clay is not readily
available or where conserving air space is an
important factor. As GCLs do not have the
level of long-term field performance data that
geomembranes or compacted clay liners do,
states might request a demonstration that
performance of the GCL design will be com-
parable to that of compacted clay or
geomembrane liners.
What are the mass per unit area
and hydraulic conductivity recom-
mendations for geosynthetic clay
liners?
Geosynthetic clay liners are often designed
to perform the same function as compacted
clay and geomembrane liner components. For
geosynthetic clay liners, you should design
for a minimum of 3.7 kg/m2 (0.75 lb/ft2) dry
weight (oven dried at 105°C) of bentonite
clay with a hydrated hydraulic conductivity
of no more than 5 x 1O9 cm/sec (2 x 1O9
in/sec). It is important to follow manufacturer
specifications for proper GCL installation.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the design of a geosyn-
thetic clay liner?
Factors to consider in GCL design are the
specific material properties needed for the
liner and the chemical interaction or compat-
ibility of the waste with the GCL. When con-
sidering material properties, it is important to
keep in mind that bentonite has a low shear
strength when it is hydrated. Manufacturers
have developed products designed to increase
shear strength.
Materials Selection and Properties
For an effective GCL design, material
properties should be clearly defined in the
specifications used during both manufacture
and construction. The properties that should
be specified include: type of bonds, thick-
ness, moisture content, mass per unit area,
shear strength, and tensile strength. Each of
these properties is described below.
7B-17
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Type of bonds. Geosynthetic clay liners
are available with a variety of bonding
designs, which include a combination of clay
adhesives, and geomembranes or geotextiles.
The type of adhesives, geotextiles, and
geomembranes used as components of GCLs
varies widely. One type of available GCL
design uses a bentonite clay mixed with an
adhesive bound on each side by geotextiles.
A variation on this design involves stitching
the upper and lower geotextiles together
through the clay layer. Alternatively, another
option is to use a GCL where geotextiles on
each side of adhesive or nonadhesive ben-
tonite clay are connected by needle punch-
ing. A fourth variation uses a clay mixed with
an adhesive bound to a geomembrane on one
side; the geomembrane can be either the
lower or the upper surface. Figure 3 displays
cross section sketches of the four variations
of GCL bonds. While these options describe
GCLs available at the time of this Guide,
emerging technologies in GCL designs
should also be reviewed and considered.
Thickness. The thickness of the various
available GCL products ranges from 4 to 6
mm (160 to 320 mil). Thickness measure-
ments are product dependent. Some GCLs
can be quality controlled for thickness while
others cannot.
Moisture content. GCLs are delivered to
the job site at moisture contents ranging from
5 to 23 percent, referred to as the "dry" state.
GCLs are delivered dry to prevent premature
hydration, which can cause unwanted varia-
tions in the thickness of the clay component
as a result of uneven swelling.
Stability and shear strength. GCLs
should be manufactured and selected to meet
the shear strength requirements specified in
design plans. In this context, shear strength
is the ability of two layers to resist forces
moving them in opposite directions. Since
hydrated bentonite clay has low shear
strength, bentonite clay can be placed
between geotextiles and stitch bonded or
needle- punched to provide additional stabil-
ity. For example, a GCL with geotextiles sup-
ported by stitch bonding has greater internal
resistance to shear in the clay layer than a
GCL without any stitching. Needle-punched
GCLs tend to provide greater resistance than
stitch-bonded GCLs and can also provide
increased friction resistance against an
adjoining layer, because they require the use
of nonwoven geotextiles. Increased friction is
an important consideration on side slopes.
Mass per unit area. Mass per unit area
refers to the bentonite content of a GCL. It is
important to distribute bentonite evenly
throughout the GCL in order to meet desired
hydraulic conductivity specifications. All
GCL products available in North America use
a sodium bentonite clay with a mass per unit
area ranging from 3.2 to 6.0 kg/m2 (0.66 to
1.2 lb/ft2), as manufactured.
Interaction With Waste
During the selection process for a GCL
liner, you should evaluate the chemical com-
patibility of the liner materials with the types
of waste that are expected to be placed in the
unit. Certain chemicals, such as calcium, can
have an adverse effect on GCLs, resulting in a
loss of liner integrity. Specific information on
GCL compatibilities should be available from
the manufacturer.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the construction of a
geosynthetic clay liner?
Prior to and during construction, it is rec-
ommended that a qualified professional
should prepare construction specifications for
the GCL. In these specifications, procedures
for shipping and storing materials, as well as
performing acceptance testing on delivered
7B-18
-------
1
5 mm
I
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Figure 3
Four Variations of GCL Bonding Methods
Clay + Adhesive
(a) Adhesive Bound Clay to Upper and Lower Goetextiles
5 mm
'!$^2\^/fWft^^^2\'>$5/fil<>/Ł
2i22ii
?^%T
1
Clay + A
^<&s$&Wjii;-$gg<&
PTT
dhesive or
1
Clay
ys^Awm^
^T!S^^^7^^1>-iT!S^^^7^^1>-iT!S^^^7'%l>-i
t—
^^f
(b) Stitch Bonded Clay Between Upper and Lower Goetextiles
(c) Needle Punched Clay Through Upper and Lower Goetextiles
(d) Adhesive Bound Clay to a Geomembrane
Upper Geotextile
Lower Geotextile
Upper Geotextile
Stitch Bonded
in Rows
Lower Geotextile
Upper Geotextile
Needle Punched
Fibers Throughout
Lower Geotextile
Lower or Upper
Geomembrane
Source: U.S. EPA, 1993c.
7B-19
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
materials, should be identified. The specifica-
tions should also address methods for sub-
grade preparation, joining panels, repairing
sections, and protective backfilling.
Shipment, Handling, and Site
Storage
GCLs are manufactured in widths of
approximately 2 to 5 m (7 to 17 ft) and
lengths of 30 to 60 m (100 to 200 ft).
Directly after manufacturing, GCLs are rolled
around a core and covered with a thin plastic
protective covering. This waterproof covering
serves to protect the material from premature
hydration. GCLs should be stored at the fac-
tory with these protective coverings. Typical
storage lengths range from a few days to 6
months. To ensure protection of the plastic
covering and the rolls themselves during
loading and unloading, it is recommended
that qualified professionals specify the equip-
ment needed at the site to lift and deploy the
rolls properly.
To reduce the potential for accidental
damage or for GCLs to absorb moisture at
the site, you should try to arrange for "just-
in-time-delivery" for GCLs transported from
the factory to the field. Even with "just-in-
time-delivery," it might be necessary to store
GCLs for short periods of time at the site.
Often the rolls can be delivered in trailers,
which can then serve as temporary storage.
To help protect the GCLs prior to deploy-
ment, you should use wooden pallets to keep
the rolls off the ground, placing heavy, water-
proof tarps over the GCL rolls to protect
them from precipitation, and using sandbags
to help keep the tarps in place.
Manufacturer specifications should also
indicate how high rolls of GCLs can be
stacked horizontally during storage. Over-
stacking can cause compression of the core
around which the GCL is wrapped. A dam-
aged core makes deployment more difficult
and can lead to other problems. For example,
rolls are sometimes handled by a fork lift
with a stinger attached. The stinger is a long
tapered rod that fits inside the core. If the
core is crushed, the stinger can damage the
liner during deployment.
Acceptance and Con forma nee
Testing
Acceptance and conformance testing is rec-
ommended either upon delivery of the GCL
rolls or at the manufacturer's facility prior to
delivery. Conformance test samples are used
to ensure that the GCL meets the project
plans and specifications. GCLs should be
rewrapped and replaced in dry storage areas
immediately after test samples are removed.
Liner specifications should prescribe sampling
frequencies based on either total area or on
number of rolls. Since variability in GCLs can
exist between individual rolls, it is important
for acceptance and conformance testing to
account for this. Conformance testing can
include the following.
Mass per unit area test. The purpose of
evaluating mass per unit area is to ensure an
even distribution of bentonite throughout the
GCL panel. Although mass per unit area
varies from manufacturer to manufacturer, a
typical minimum value for oven dry weight
is 3.7 kg/m2 (0.75 lb/ft2). Mass per unit area
should be tested using ASTM D-5993.14 This
test measures the mass of bentonite per unit
area of GCL. Sampling frequencies should be
determined using ASTM D- 4354.15
Free swell test. Free swell refers to the
ability of the clay to absorb liquid. Either
ASTM D-5890 or GRI-GCL1, a test method
developed by the Geosynthetic Research
Institute, can be used to evaluate the free
swell of the material.16
7B-20
14 ASTM D-5993, Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geosynthetic Clay Liners.
15 ASTM D-4354, Standard Practice for Sampling of Geosynthetics for Testing.
16 ASTM D-5890, Test Method for Swell Index of Clay Mineral Components of Geosynthetic Clay Liners.
GRI-GCL1, Swell Measurement of the Clay Component of Geosynthetic Clay Liners.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Direct shear test. Shear strength of the
GCLs can be evaluated using ASTM D-5321.17
The sampling frequency for this performance-
oriented test is often based on area, such as
one test per 10,000 m2 (100,000 ft2).
Hydraulic conductivity test. Either ASTM
D-5084 (modified) or GRI-GCL2 will mea-
sure the ease with which liquids can move
through the GCL.18
Other tests. Testing of any geotextiles or
geomembranes should be made on the origi-
nal rolls of the geotextiles or geomembranes
and before they are fabricated into the GCL
product. Once these materials have been
made part of the GCL product, their proper-
ties can change as a result of any needling,
stitching, or gluing. Additionally, any peel
tests performed on needle punched or stitch
bonded GCLs should use the modified ASTM
D-413 with a recommended sampling fre-
quency of one test per 2,000 m2 (20,000 ft2).19
Subgrade Preparation
Because the GCL layer is relatively thin,
the first foot of soil underlying the GCL
should have a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x
10~5 cm/sec or less. Proper subgrade prepara-
tion is essential to prevent damage to the
GCL layer as it is installed. This includes
clearing away any roots or large particles that
could potentially puncture the GCL and its
geotextile or geomembrane components. The
soil subgrade should be of the specified grad-
ing, moisture content, and density required
by the installer and approved by a construc-
tion quality assurance engineer for placement
of the GCL. Construction equipment deploy-
ing the rolls should not deform or rut the soil
subgrade excessively. To help ensure this, the
soil subgrade should be smooth rolled with a
smooth-wheel roller and maintained in a
smooth condition prior to deployment.
Joining Panels
GCLs are typically joined by overlapping
panels, without sewing or mechanically con-
necting pieces together. To ensure proper
joints, you should specify minimum and
maximum overlap distances. Typical overlap
distances range from 150 to 300 mm (6 to 12
in.). For some GCLs, such as needle punched
GCLs with nonwoven geotextiles, it might be
necessary to place bentonite on the area of
overlap. If this is necessary, you should take
steps to prevent fugitive bentonite particles
from coming into contact with the leachate
collection system, as they can cause physical
clogging.
Repair of Sections Damaged During
Liner Placement
During installation, GCLs might incur
some damage to either the clay component or
to any geotextiles or geomembranes. For
damage to geotextile or geomembrane com-
ponents, repairs include patching using geot-
extile or geomembrane materials. If the clay
component is disturbed, a patch made from
the same GCL product should be used to per-
form any repairs.
Protective Backfilling
As soon as possible after completion of
quality assurance and quality control activi-
ties, you should cover GCLs with either a soil
layer or a geosynthetic layer to prevent
hydration. The soil layer can be a compacted
clay liner or a layer of coarse drainage materi-
al. The geosynthetic layer is typically a
17 ASTM D-5321, Standard Test Method for Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic or
Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method.
18 ASTM D-5084, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous
Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter.
GRI-GCL2, Permeability of Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs).
19 ASTM D-413, Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property-Adhesion to Flexible Substrate.
7B-21
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
geomembrane; however, depending on site-
specific designs, it can be a geotextile. As
noted earlier, premature hydration before
covering can lead to uneven swelling, result-
ing in a GCL with varied thickness.
Therefore, a GCL should be covered with its
subsequent soil or geosynthetic layer before a
rainfall or snowfall occurs. Premature hydra-
tion is less of a concern for GCLs, where the
geosynthetic components are needle punched
or stitch bonded, because these types of con-
nections can better limit clay expansion.
. Composite
Liners
A composite liner consists of both a
geomembrane liner and natural soil. The
geomembrane forms the upper component
with the natural soil being the lower compo-
nent. The ususal variations are:
• Geomembrane over compacted clay
liner (GM/CCL).
• Geomembrane over geosynthetic clay
liner (GM/GCL).
• Geomembrane over geosynthetic clay
liner over compacted clay liner
(GM/GCL/CCL).
A composite liner provides an effective
hydraulic barrier by combining the comple-
mentary properties of the two different liners
into one system. The geomembrane provides a
highly impermeable layer to maximize leachate
collection and removal. The natural soil liner
serves as a backup in the event of any leakage
from the geomembrane. With a composite
liner design, you should construct a leachate
collection and removal system above the
geomembrane. Information on design and con-
struction of leachate collection and removal
systems is provided in Section V below.
What are the thickness and
hydraulic conductivity recom-
mendations for composite liners?
Each component of the composite liner
should follow the recommendations for
geomembranes, geosynthetic clay liners, and
compacted clay liners described earlier.
Geomembrane liners should have a mini-
mum thickness of 30 mil, except for HDPE
liners, which should have a minimum thick-
ness of 60 mil. Similarly, compacted clay lin-
ers should be at least 2 feet thick and are
typically 2 to 5 feet thick. For compacted
clay liners and geosynthetic clay liners, you
should use materials with maximum
hydraulic conductivities of 1 x 10~7 cm/sec (4
x 10-8 in/sec) and 5 x 10~9 cm/sec (2 x 1Q-9
in/sec), respectively.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the design of a compos-
ite liner?
As a starting point, you should follow the
design considerations discussed previously for
single liners. In addition, to achieve the bene-
fits of a combined liner system, you should
install the geomembrane to ensure good con-
tact with the compacted clay layer. The uni-
formity of contact between the geomembrane
and the compacted clay layer helps control
the flow of leachate. Porous material, such as
drainage sand or a geonet, should not be
placed between the geomembrane and the
clay layer. Porous materials will create a layer
of higher hydraulic conductivity, which will
increase the amount of leakage below any
geomembrane imperfection.
You should consider the friction or shear
strength between a compacted clay layer and
a geomembrane. The friction or shear stress
at this surface is often low and can form a
weak plane on which sliding can occur.
7B-22
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
ASTM D-5321 provides a test method for
determining the friction coefficient of soil and
geomembranes.20 When using bentonite -
amended soils, it is important to account for
how the percentage of bentonite added and
the degree of saturation affect interface fric-
tion. To provide for stable slopes, it is impor-
tant to control both the bentonite and
moisture contents. A textured geomembrane
can increase the friction with the clay layer
and improve stability.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the construction of a
composite liner?
To achieve good composite bonding, the
geomembrane and the compacted clay layer
should have good hydraulic contact. To
improve good contact, you should smooth-
roll the surface of the compacted clay layer
using a smooth, steel-drummed roller and
remove any stones. In addition, you should
place and backfill the geomembrane so as to
minimize wrinkles.
The placement of geomembranes onto a
compacted clay layer poses a challenge,
because workers cannot drive heavy
machines over the clay surface without
potentially damaging the compacted clay
component. Even inappropriate footwear can
leave imprints in the clay layer. It might be
possible to drive some types of low ground
pressure equipment or small, 4-wheel, all ter-
rain vehicles over the clay surface, but drivers
should take extreme care to avoid move-
ments, such as sudden starts, stops, and
turns, that could damage the surface. To
avoid damaging the clay layer, it is recom-
mended that you unroll geomembranes by
lifting the rolls onto jacks at a cell side and
pulling down on the geomembrane manually.
Also, the entire roll with its core can be
unrolled onto the cell (with auxiliary support
using ropes on embankments).
To minimize desiccation of the compacted
clay layer, you should place the geomem-
brane over the clay layer as soon as possible.
Additional cover materials should also be
placed over the geomembrane. Exposed
geomembranes absorb heat, and high temper-
atures can dry out and crack an underlying
compacted clay layer. Daily cyclic changes in
temperature can draw water from the clay
layer and cause this water to condense on the
underside of the geomembrane. This with-
drawal of water can lead to desiccation crack-
ing and potential interface stability concerns.
IV. Double Liners
(Primary and
Secondary Lined
Systems)
In a double-lined waste management unit,
there are two distinct liners—one primary
(top) liner and one secondary (bottom) liner.
Each liner might consist of compacted clay, a
geomembrane, or a composite (consisting of a
geomembrane and a compacted clay layer or
GCL). Above the primary liner, it is recom-
mended that you construct a leachate collec-
tion and removal system to collect and convey
liquids out of the waste management unit and
to control the depth of liquids above the pri-
mary liner. In addition, you should place a
leak detection, collection, and removal system
between the primary and secondary liner.
This leak detection system will provide leak
warning, as well as collect and remove any
liquid or leachate that has escaped the prima-
ry liner. See section V below for information
on the design of leachate collection and
removal systems and leak detection, collec-
tion, and removal systems.
20 ASTM D-5321, Standard Test Method for Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic or
Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method.
7B-23
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
What are the thickness and
hydraulic conductivity recom-
mendations for double liners?
Each component of the double liner
should follow the recommendations for
geomembranes, compacted clay liners, or
composite liners described earlier.
Geomembrane liners should have a minimum
thickness of 30 mil, except for HDPE liners,
which should have a minimum thickness of
60 mil. Similarly, compacted clay liners
should be at least 2 feet thick and are typical-
ly 2 to 5 feet thick. For compacted clay liners
and geosynthetic clay liners, use materials
with maximum hydraulic conductivities of 1
x 10-7 cm/sec (4 x 1Q-8 in/sec) and 5 x 1Q-9
cm/sec (2 x 1O9 in/sec), respectively.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the design and construc-
tion of a double liner?
Like composite liners, double liners are
composed of a combination of single liners.
When planning to design and construct a
double liner, you should consult the sections
on composite and single liners first. In addi-
tion, you should consult the sections on
leachate collection and removal systems and
leak detection systems.
V. Leachate
Collection and
Leak Detection
Systems
One of the most important functions of a
waste management unit is controlling
leachate and preventing contamination of the
underlying ground water. Both leachate col-
lection and removal systems and leak detec-
tion systems serve this purpose. You should
consult with the state agency too determine if
such systems are required. The primary func-
tion of a leachate collection and removal sys-
tem is to collect and convey leachate out of a
unit and to control the depth of leachate
above a liner. The primary function of a leak
detection system is to detect leachate that has
escaped the primary liner. A leak detection
system refers to drainage material located
below the primary liner and above a sec-
ondary liner (if there is one); it acts as a sec-
ondary leachate collection and removal
system. After the leachate has been removed
and collected, a leachate treatment system
might be incorporated to process the leachate
and remove harmful constituents.
The information in this section on leachate
collection and leak detection systems is
applicable if the unit is a landfill or a waste
pile. Surface impoundments, which manage
liquid wastes, usually will not have leachate
collection and removal systems unless they
will be closed in-place as landfills; they might
have leak detection systems to detect liquid
wastes that have escaped the primary liner.
Leachate collection or leak detection systems
generally are not used with land application.
A. Leachate Collection
System
A typical leachate collection system
includes a drainage layer, collection pipes, a
removal system, and a protective filter layer.
Leachate collection systems are designed to
collect leachate for treatment or alternate dis-
posal and to reduce the buildup of leachate
above the liner system. Figure 4 shows a
cross section of a typical leachate collection
system showing access to pipes for cleaning.
7B-24
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Figure 4
Typical Leachate Collection System
Concrete base
Sweep bend and cap
Manhole Casing
Solid pipe
Recompacted
clay
Sweep bend
Perforated pipe
Pipe backfill
Source: U.S. EPA, 1995b
What are the recommendations
for leachate collection and
removal systems?
You should design a leachate collection and
removal system to maintain less than 30 cm
(12 in.) depth of leachate, or "head," above
the liner if granular soil or a geosynthetic
material is used. The reason for maintaining
this level is to prevent excessive leachate from
building up above the liner, which could
jeopardize the liner's performance. This
should be the underlying factor guiding the
design, construction, and operation of the
leachate collection and removal system.
You should design a leachate collection
and removal system capable of controlling the
estimated volume of leachate. To determine
potential leachate generation, you should use
water balance equations or models. The most
commonly used method to estimate leachate
generation is EPA's Hydrogeologic Evaluation
of Landfill Performance (HELP) model.21 This
model uses weather, soil, and waste manage-
ment unit design data to determine leachate
generation rates.
What issues should be consid-
ered in the design of a leachate
collection and removal system?
You should design a leachate collection
and removal system to include the following
elements: a low-permeability base, a high-
permeability drainage layer, perforated
leachate collection pipes, a protective filter
layer, and a leachate removal system. During
21 Available on the CD-ROM version of the Guide, as well as from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Web
site
7B-25
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
design, you should consider the stability of
the base, the transmissivity of the drainage
layers, and the strength of the collection
pipes. It is also prudent to consider methods
to minimize physical, biological, and chemi-
cal clogging within the system.
Low-Permeability Base
A leachate collection system is placed over
the unit's liner system. The bottom liner
should have a minimum slope of 2 percent to
allow the leachate collection system to gravity
flow to a collection sump. This grade is nec-
essary to provide proper leachate drainage
throughout the operation, closure, and post-
closure of the unit. Estimates of foundation
soil settlement should include this 2 percent
grade as a post-settlement design.
High-Permeability Drainage Layer
A high-permeability drainage layer consists
of drainage materials placed directly over the
low-permeability base, at the same minimum
2 percent grade. The drainage materials can
be either granular soil or geosynthetic materi-
als. For soil drainage materials, a maximum of
12 inches of materials with a hydraulic con-
ductivity of at least 1 x 1O2 cm/sec (4 x 1(P
in/sec) is recommended. For this reason, sand
and gravel are the most common soil materi-
als used. If the drainage layer is going to
incorporate sand or gravel, it should be
demonstrated that the layer will have suffi-
cient bearing capacity to withstand the waste
load of the full unit. Additionally, if the waste
management unit is designed on grades of 15
percent or higher, it should be demonstrated
that the soil drainage materials will be stable
on the steepest slope in the design.
Geosynthetic drainage materials such as
geonets can be used in addition to, or in place
of, soil materials. Geonets promote rapid
transmission of liquids and are most effective
when used in conjunction with a filter layer
or geotextile to prevent clogging. Geonets
consist of integrally connected parallel sets of
plastic ribs overlying similar sets at various
angles. Geonets are often used on the side
walls of waste management units because of
their ease of installation. Figure 5 depicts a
typical geonet material configuration.
The most critical factor involved with using
geonets in a high-permeability drainage layer
is the material's ability to transmit fluids
under load. The flow rate of a geonet can be
evaluated by ASTM D-4716.22 Several addi-
tional measures for determining the transmis-
sivity of geonets are discussed in the Solid
Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical
Manual (U.S. EPA, 1993b).
Perforated Leachate Collection Pipes
Whenever the leachate collection system is
a natural soil, a perforated piping system
should be located within it to rapidly trans-
mit the leachate to a sump and removal sys-
tem. Through the piping system, leachate
flows gravitationally to a low point where the
sump and removal system is located. The
design of perforated leachate collection pipes,
therefore, should consider necessary flow
rates, pipe sizing, and pipe structural
strength. After estimating the amount of
leachate using the HELP model or a similar
water balance model, it is possible to calcu-
late the appropriate pipe diameter and spac-
ing. For the leachate collection system
design, you should select piping material that
can withstand the anticipated weight of the
waste, construction and operating equipment
stresses, and foundation settling. Most
leachate collection pipes used in modern
waste management units are constructed of
HDPE. HDPE pipes provide great structural
strength, while allowing significant chemical
resistance to the many constituents found in
leachate. PVC pipes are also used in waste
22 ASTM D-4716, Standard Test Method for Constant Head Hydraulic Transmissivity (In-Plane Flow) of
Geotextiles and Geotextile Related Products.
7B-26
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Figure 5
Typical Geonet Configuration
Channel
management units, but they are not as chemi-
cally resistant as HDPE pipes.
Protective Filter Layer
To protect the drainage layer and perforat-
ed leachate collection piping from clogging,
you should place a filter layer over the high-
permeability drainage layer. To prevent waste
material from moving into the drainage layer,
the filter layer should consist of a material
with smaller pore space than the drainage
layer materials or the perforation openings in
the collection pipes. Sand and geotextiles are
the two most common materials used for fil-
tration. You should select sand that allows
adequate flow of liquids, prevents migration
of overlying solids or soils into the drainage
layer, and minimizes clogging during the ser-
vice life. In designing the sand filter, you
should consider particle size and hydraulic
conductivity. The advantages of using sand
materials include common usage, traditional
design, and durability.
Any evaluation of geotextile materials
should address the same concerns but with a
few differences. To begin with, the average
pore size of the geotextile should be large
enough to allow the finer soil particles to pass
but small enough to
retain larger soil parti-
cles. The number of
openings in the geotex-
tile should be large
enough that, even if
some of the openings
clog, the remaining
openings will be suffi-
cient to pass the design
flow rate. In addition to
pore size, geotextile fil-
ter specifications should
include durability
requirements. The
advantages of geotextile
materials include vertical space savings and
easy placement. Chapter 5 of Technical
Guidance Document: Quality Assurance and
Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities
(U.S. EPA, 1993c) offers guidance on protec-
tion of drainage layers.
Leachate Removal System
Leachate removal often involves housing a
sump within the leachate collection drainage
layer. A sump is a low point in the liner con-
structed to collect leachate. Modern waste
management unit sumps often consist of pre-
fabricated polyethylene structures supported
on a steel plate above the liner. Especially
with geomembrane liners, the steel plate
serves to support the weight of the sump and
protect the liner from puncture. Gravel filled
earthen depressions can serve as the sump.
Reinforced concrete pipe and concrete floor-
ing also can be used in place of the polyethyl-
ene structure but are considerably heavier.
To remove leachate that has collected in
the sump, you should use a submersible
pump. Ideally, the sump should be placed at
a depth of 1 to 1.5 m (3 to 5 ft) to allow
enough leachate collection to prevent the
pump from running dry. You should consider
7B-27
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
installing a level control, backup pump, and
warning system to ensure proper sump oper-
ation. Also consider using a backup pump as
an alternate to the primary pump and to
assist it during high flow periods. A warning
system should be used to indicate pump mal-
function.
Standpipes, vertical pipes extending
through the waste and cover system, offer
one method of removing leachate from a
sump without puncturing the liner.
Alternatively, you can remove leachate from a
sump using pipes that are designed to pene-
trate the liner. When installing pipe penetra-
tions through the liner, you should proceed
with extreme caution to prevent any liner
damage that could result in uncontained
leachate. Both of these options rely on gravity
to direct leachate to a leachate collection
pond or to an external pumping station.
Minimizing Clogging
Leachate collection and removal systems
are susceptible to physical, biological, and
chemical clogging. Physical clogging can
occur through the migration of finer-grained
materials into coarser-grained materials, thus
reducing the hydraulic conductivity of the
coarser-grained material. Biological clogging
can occur through bacterial growth in the
system due to the organic and nutrient mate-
rials in leachate. Chemical clogging can be
caused by chemical precipitates, such as cal-
cium carbonates, causing blockage or cemen-
tation of granular drainage material.
Proper selection of drainage and filter mate-
rials is essential to minimize clogging in the
high-permeability drainage layer. Soil and geo-
textile filters can be used to minimize physical
clogging of both granular drainage material
and leachate collection pipes. When placed
above granular drainage material, these filters
can also double as an operations layer to pre-
vent sharp waste from damaging the liner or
leachate collection and removal systems. To
minimize chemical and biological clogging for
granular drainage material, the best procedure
is to keep the interstices of the granular
drainage material as open as possible.
The leachate collection pipes are also sus-
ceptible to similar clogging. To prevent this,
you should incorporate measures into the
design to allow for routine pipe cleaning,
using either mechanical or hydraulic meth-
ods. The cleaning components can include
pipes with a 15 cm (6 in) minimum diameter
to facilitate cleaning; access located at major
pipe intersections or bends to allow for
inspections and cleaning; and valves, ports,
or other appurtenances to introduce biocides
and cleaning solutions. Also, you should
check that the design does not include wrap-
ping perforated leachate collection pipes
directly with geotextile filters. If the geotex-
tile becomes clogged, it can block flow into
the pipe.
B. Leak Detection System
The leak detection system (LDS) is also
known as the secondary leachate collection
and removal system. It uses the same
drainage and collection components as the
primary leachate collection and removal sys-
tem and identifies, collects, and removes any
leakage from the primary system. The LDS
should be located directly below the primary
liner and above the secondary liner.
What are the recommendations
for leak detection systems?
The LDS should be designed to assess the
adequacy of the primary liner against
leachate leakage; it should cover both the
bottom and side walls of a waste manage-
ment unit. The LDS should be designed to
collect leakage through the primary layer and
transport it to a sump within 24 hours.
7B-28
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
The LDS should allow for monitoring and
collection of leachate escaping the primary
liner system. You should monitor the LDS on
a regular basis. If the volume of leachate
detected by the LDS appears to be increasing
or is significant, you should consider a closer
examination to determine possible remedia-
tion measures. A good rule of thumb is that if
the LDS indicates a seepage level greater than
20 gallons per acre per day the system might
need closer monitoring or remediation.
C. Leachate Treatment
System
Once the leachate has been removed from
the unit and collected, you should consider
taking measures to characterize the leachate
in order to ensure proper management. There
are several methods of disposal for leachate,
and the treatment strategy will vary according
to the disposal method chosen. Leachate dis-
posal options include discharging to or
pumping and hauling to a publicly owned
treatment works or to an onsite treatment
system; treating and discharging to the envi-
ronment; land application; and natural or
mechanical evaporation.
When discharging to or pumping and
hauling leachate to a publicly owned treat-
ment works, a typical treatment strategy
includes pretreatment. Pretreatment could
involve equalization, aeration, sedimentation,
pH adjustment, or metals removal.23 If the
plan for leachate disposal does not involve a
remote treatment facility, pretreatment alone
usually is not sufficient.
There are two categories of leachate treat-
ment, biological and physical/chemical. The
most common method of biological treatment
is activated sludge. Activated sludge is a "sus-
pended-growth process that uses aerobic
microorganisms to biodegrade organic contam-
inants in leachate."24 Among physical/chemical
treatment techniques, the carbon absorption
process and reverse osmosis are the two most
common methods. Carbon absorption uses
carbon to remove dissolved organics from
leachate and is very expensive. Reverse osmo-
sis involves feeding leachate into a tubular
chamber whose wall acts as a synthetic mem-
brane, allowing water molecules to pass
through but not pollutant molecules, thereby
separating clean water from waste constituents.
What are the recommendations
for leachate treatment systems?
You should review all applicable federal
and state regulations and discharge standards
to determine which treatment system will
ensure long-term compliance and flexibility
for the unit. Site-specific factors will also play
a fundamental role in determining the proper
leachate treatment system. For some facilities,
onsite storage and treatment might not be an
option due to space constraints. For other
facilities, having a nearby, publicly owned
treatment works might make pretreatment
and discharge to the treatment works an
attractive alternative.
VI. Construction
Quality
Assurance and
Quality Control
Even the best unit design will not translate
into a structure that is protective of human
health and the environment, if the unit is not
properly constructed. Manufacturing quality
assurance and manufacturing quality control
(MQA and MQC) are also important issues
for the overall project; however, they are dis-
cussed only briefly here since they are pri-
marily the responsibility of a manufacturer.
Nonetheless, it is best to select a manufactur-
23 Arts, Tom. "Alternative Approaches For Leachate Treatment." World Wastes.
24 Ibid.
7B-29
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
er who incorporates appropriate quality
assurance and quality control (QA and QC)
mechanisms as part of the manufacturing
process. The remainder of this section pro-
vides a general description of the compo-
nents of a construction quality assurance and
construction quality control (CQA and CQC)
program for a project. CQA and CQC are
critical factors for waste management units.
They are not interchangeable, and the dis-
tinction between them should be kept in
mind when preparing plans. CQA is third
party verification of quality while CQC con-
sists of in-process measures taken by the con-
tractor or installer to maintain quality. You
should establish clear protocols for identify-
ing and addressing issues of concern
throughout every stage of construction.
What is manufacturing quality
assurance?
The desired characteristics of liner materi-
als should be specified in the unit's contract
with the manufacturer. The manufacturer
should be responsible for certifying that mate-
rials delivered conform to those specifications.
MQC implemented to ensure such confor-
mance might take the form of process quality
control or computer-aided quality control. If
requested, the manufacturer should provide
information on the MQC measures used,
allow unit personnel or engineers to visit the
manufacturing facility, and provide liner sam-
ples for testing. It is good practice for the
manufacturer to have a dedicated individual
in charge of MQC who would work with unit
personnel in these areas.
What is construction quality
assurance?
CQA is a verification tool employed by the
facility manager or regulatory agency, consist-
ing of a planned series of observations and
tests designed to ensure that the final prod-
uct meets project specifications. CQA testing,
often referred to as acceptance inspection,
provides a measure of the final product quali-
ty and its conformance with project plans
and specifications. Performing acceptance
inspections routinely, as portions of the pro-
ject become complete, allows early detection
and correction of deficiencies, before they
become large and costly.
On routine construction projects, CQA is
normally the concern of the facility manager
and is usually performed by an independent,
third-party testing firm. The independence of
the testing firm is important, particularly
when a facility manager has the capacity to
perform the CQA activities. Although the
MQC, MQA, CQC, and CQA
Manufacturing quality control
(MQC) is measures taken by the manu-
facturer to ensure compliance with the
material and workmanship specifications
of the facility manager.
Manufacturer quality assurance
(MQA) is measures taken by facility per-
sonnel, or by an impartial party brought
in expressly for the purpose, to deter-
mine if the manufacturer is in compli-
ance with the specifications of the facility
manager.
Construction quality control (CQC)
is measures taken by the installer or con-
tractor to ensure compliance with the
installation specifications of the facility
manager.
Construction quality assurance
(CQA) is measures taken by facility per-
sonnel, or by an impartial party brought
in expressly for the purpose, to deter-
mine if the installer or contractor is in
compliance with the installation specifi-
cations of the facility manager.
7B-30
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
facility's in-house CQA personnel might be
registered professional engineers, a perception
of misrepresentation might arise if CQA is not
performed by an independent third party.
The independent party should designate a
CQA officer and fully disclose any activities
or relationships that the officer has with the
facility manager that might impact his or her
impartiality or objectivity. If such activities or
relationships exist, the CQA officer should
describe actions that have been or can be
taken to avoid, mitigate, or neutralize the
possibility they might affect the CQA officer's
objectivity. State regulatory representatives
can help evaluate whether these mechanisms
are sufficient to ensure acceptable CQA.
What is construction quality
control?
CQC is an ongoing process of measuring
and controlling the characteristics of the prod-
uct in order to meet manufacturer's or project
specifications. CQC inspections are typically
performed by the contractor to provide an in-
process measure of construction quality and
conformance with the project plans and speci-
fications, thereby allowing the contractor to
correct the construction process if the quality
of the product is not meeting the specifica-
tions and plans. Since CQC is a production
tool employed by the manufacturer of materi-
als and by the contractor installing the materi-
als at the site, the Guide does not cover CQC
in detail. CQC is performed independently of
CQA. For example, while a geomembrane
liner installer will perform CQC testing of
field seams, the CQA program should require
independent testing of those same seams by a
third-party inspector.
How can implementation of CQA
and CQC plans be ensured?
When preparing to design and construct a
waste management unit, regardless of design,
you should develop CQA and CQC plans
customized to the project. To help the project
run smoothly, the CQA plan should be easy
to follow. You should organize the CQA plan
to reflect the sequence of construction and
write it in language that will be familiar to an
average field technician. For a more detailed
discussion of specific CQA and CQC activi-
ties recommended for each type of waste
management unit, you should consult
Technical Guidance Document: Quality
Assurance and Quality Control for Waste
Management Containment Facilities (U.S. EPA,
1993c). This document provides information
to develop comprehensive QA plans and to
carry out QC procedures at waste manage-
ment units.
CQA and CQC plans can be implemented
through a series of meetings and inspections,
which should be documented thoroughly.
Communication among all parties involved in
design and construction of a waste manage-
ment unit is essential to ensuring a quality
product. You should define responsibility and
authority in written QA and QC plans and
ensure that each party involved understands
its role. Pre-construction meetings are one
way to help clarify roles and responsibilities.
During construction, meetings can continue
to be useful to help resolve misunderstandings
and to identify solutions to unanticipated
problems that might develop. Some examples
of typical meetings during the course of any
construction project include pre-bid meetings,
resolution meetings, pre-construction meet-
ings, and progress meetings.
7B-31
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
A. Compacted Clay Liner
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
Although manufacturing quality control
and quality assurance are often the responsi-
bility of the materials manufacturer, in the
case of soil components, manufacturing and
construction quality control testing can be
the responsibility of the facility manager. The
CQA and CQC plans should specify proce-
dures for quality assurance and quality con-
trol during construction of the compacted
clay liners.
How can implementation of QA
and QC be ensured for a com-
pacted clay liner?
QC testing is typically performed by the
contractor on materials used in construction
of the liner. This testing examines material
properties such as moisture content, soil den-
sity, Atterberg limits, grain size, and laborato-
ry hydraulic conductivity. Additional testing
of soil moisture content, density, lift thick-
ness, and hydraulic conductivity helps ensure
that the waste management unit has been
constructed in accordance with the plans and
technical specifications.
CQA testing for soil liners includes the
same tests described for QC testing in the
paragraph above. Generally, the tests are per-
formed less frequently. CQA testing is per-
formed by an individual or an entity
independent of the contractor. Activities of
the CQA officer are essential to document
quality of construction. The responsibilities
of the CQA officer and his or her staff might
include communicating with the contractor;
interpreting and clarifying project drawings
and specifications with the designer, facility
manager, and contractor; recommending
acceptance or rejection by the facility manag-
er of work completed by the construction
contractor; and submitting blind samples,
such as duplicates and blanks, for analysis by
the contractor's testing staff or independent
laboratories.
You should also consider constructing a
test pad prior to full-scale construction as a
CQA tool. As described earlier in the section
on compacted clay liners, pilot construction
or test fill of a small-scale test pad can be
used to verify that the soil, equipment, and
construction procedures can produce a liner
that performs according to the construction
drawings and specifications.
Specific factors to examine or test during
construction of a test fill include: preparation
and compaction of foundation material to the
required bearing strength; methods of con-
trolling uniformity of the soil material; com-
pactive effort, such as type of equipment and
number of passes needed to achieve required
soil density and hydraulic conductivity; and
lift thickness and placement procedures
needed to achieve uniformity of density
throughout a lift and prevent boundary
effects between lifts or between placements in
the same lift. Test pads can also provide a
means to evaluate the ability of different
types of soil to meet hydraulic conductivity
requirements in the field. In addition to
allowing an opportunity to evaluate material
performance, test pads also allow evaluation
of the skill and competence of the construc-
tion team, including equipment operators
and QC specialists.
B. Geomembrane Liner
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
As with the construction of soil liners,
installation of geomembrane liners should be
in conformance with a CQA and CQC plan.
The responsibilities of the CQA personnel for
the installation of the geomembrane are gen-
7B-32
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
erally the same as the responsibilities for the
construction of a compacted clay liner, with
the addition of certain activities including
observations of the liner storage area and lin-
ers in storage, and handling of the liner as the
panels are positioned in the cell.
Geomembrane CQA staff should also observe
seam preparation, seam overlap, and materi-
als underlying the liner.
How can implementation of QA
and QC be ensured for a
geomembrane liner?
Prior to installation, you should work with
the geomembrane manufacturer to ensure the
labeling system for the geomembrane rolls is
clear and logical, allowing easy tracking of the
placement of the rolls within the unit. It is
important to examine the subgrade surface
with both the subgrade contractor and the liner
installer to ensure it conforms to specifications.
Once liner installation is underway, CQA
staff might be responsible for observations of
destructive testing conducted on scrap test
welds prior to seaming. Geomembrane CQA
staff might also be responsible for sending
destructive seam sampling to an independent
testing laboratory and reviewing the results for
conformance to specifications. Other observa-
tions for which the CQA staff are typically
responsible include observations of all seams
and panels for defects due to manufacturing
and handling, and placement and observations
of all pipe penetrations through a liner.
Test methods, test parameters, and testing
frequencies should be specified in the CQA
plan to provide context for any data collect-
ed. It is prudent to allow for testing frequen-
cy to change, based on the performance of
the geomembrane installer. If test results indi-
cate poor workmanship, you should increase
testing. If test results indicate high quality
installation work, you can consider reducing
testing frequencies. When varying testing fre-
quency, you should establish well-defined
procedures for modifying testing frequency. It
is also important to evaluate testing methods,
understand the differences among testing
methods, and request those methods appro-
priate for the material and seaming method
be used. Nondestructive testing methods are
preferrable when possible to help reduce the
number of holes cut into the geomembrane.
Geomembrane CQA staff also should docu-
ment the results of their observations and pre-
pare reports indicating the types of sampling
conducted and sampling results, locations of
destructive samples, locations of patches,
locations of seams constructed, and any prob-
lems encountered. In some cases, they might
need to prepare drawings of the liner installa-
tion. Record drawing preparation is frequently
assigned to the contractor, to a representative
of the facility manager, or to the engineer. You
should request complete reports from any
CQA staff and the installers. To ensure com-
plete CQA documentation, it is important to
maintain daily CQA reports and prepare
weekly summaries.
C. Geosynthetic Clay Liner
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
Construction quality assurance for geosyn-
thetic clay liners is still a developing area; the
GCL industry is continuing to establish stan-
dardized quality assurance and quality con-
trol procedures. The CQA recommendation
for GCLs can serve as a starting point. You
should check with the GCL manufacturer and
installer for more specific information.
7B-33
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
How can implementation of QA
and QC be ensured for a geosyn-
thetic day liner?
It is recommended that you develop a
detailed CQA plan, including product speci-
fications; shipping, handling, and storage
procedures; seaming methods; and placement
of overlying material. It is important to work
with the manufacturer to verify that the
product meets specifications. Upon receipt of
the GCL product, you should also verify that
it has arrived in good condition.
During construction, CQA staff should
ensure that seams are overlapped properly
and conform to specifications. CQA staff
should also check that panels, not deployed
within a short period of time, are stored
properly. In addition, as overlying material is
placed on the GCL, it is important to restrict
vehicle traffic directly on the GCL. You
should prohibit direct vehicle traffic, with the
exception of small, 4-wheel, all terrain vehi-
cles. Even with the small all-terrain vehicles,
drivers should take extreme care to avoid
movements, such as sudden starts, stops, and
turns, which can damage the GCL.
As part of the CQA documentation, it is
important to maintain records of weather
conditions, subgrade conditions, and GCL
panel locations. Also, you should document
any repairs that were necessary or other
problems identified and addressed.
D. Leachate Collection
System Quality
Assurance and Quality
Control
Leachate collection system CQC should be
performed by the contractor. Similar activi-
ties should be performed for CQA by an
independent party acting on behalf of the
facility manager. The purpose of leachate col-
lection system CQA is to document that the
system is constructed in accordance with
design specifications.
How can implementation of QA
and QC be ensured for a
leachate collection system?
Prior to construction, CQA staff should
inspect all materials to confirm that they meet
the construction plans and specifications.
These materials include: geonets; geotextiles;
pipes; granular material; mechanical, electri-
cal, and monitoring equipment; concrete
forms and reinforcements; and prefabricated
structures such as sumps and manholes. The
leachate collection system foundation, either a
geomembrane or compacted clay liner, should
also be inspected, upon its completion, to
ensure that it has proper grading and is free
of debris and liquids.
During construction, CQA staff should
observe and document, as appropriate, the
placement and installation of pipes, filter lay-
ers, drainage layers, geonets and geotextiles,
sumps, and mechanical and electrical equip-
ment. For pipes, observations might include
descriptions of pipe bedding material, quality
and thickness, as well as the total area cov-
ered by the bedding material. Observations
of pipe installations should focus on the loca-
tion, configuration, and grading of the pipes,
as well as the quality of connections at joints.
For granular filter layers, CQA activities
might include observing and documenting
material thickness and quality during place-
ment. For granular drainage layers, CQA
might focus on the protection of underlying
liners, material thickness, proper overlap
with filter fabrics and geonets (if applicable),
and documentation of any weather condi-
tions that might affect the overall perfor-
mance of the drainage layer. For geonets and
7B-34
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
other geosynthetics, CQA observations
should focus on the area of coverage and lay-
out pattern, as well as the overlap between
panels. For geonets, CQA staff might want to
make sure that the materials do not become
clogged by granular material that can be car-
ried over, as a result of either wind or runoff
during construction.
Upon completion of construction, each
component should be inspected to identify
any damage that might have occurred during
its installation or during construction of
another component. For example, a leachate
collection pipe can be crushed during place-
ment of a granular drainage layer. Any dam-
age that does occur should be repaired, and
the repairs should be documented in the
CQA records.
7B-35
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Designing and Installing Liners Activity List
Q Review the recommended location considerations and operating practices for the unit.
Q Select appropriate liner type—single, composite, or double liner—or in-situ soils, based on risk
characterization.
Q Evaluate liner material properties and select appropriate clay, geosynthetic, or combination of mate-
rials; consider interactions of liner and soil material with waste.
Q Develop a construction quality assurance (CQA) plan defining staff roles and responsibilities and
specifying test methods, storage procedures, and construction protocols.
Q Ensure a stable in-situ soil foundation, for nonengineered liners.
Q Prepare and inspect subgrade for engineered liners.
Q Work with manufacturer to ensure protective shipping, handling, and storage of all materials.
Q Construct a test pad for compacted clay liners.
Q Test compacted clay liner material before and during construction.
Q Preprocess clay material to ensure proper water content, remove oversized particles, and add soil
amendments, as applicable.
Q Use proper lift thickness and number of equipment passes to achieve adequate compaction.
Q Protect clay material from drying and cracking.
Q Develop test strips and trial seams to evaluate geomembrane seaming method.
Q Verify integrity of factory and field seams for geomembrane materials before and during construction.
Q Backfill with soil or geosynthetics to protect geomembranes and geosynthetic clay liners during
construction.
Q Place backfill materials carefully to avoid damaging the underlying materials.
Q Install geosynthetic clay liner with proper overlap.
Q Patch any damage that occurs during geomembrane or geosynthetic clay liner installation.
Q Design leachate collection and removal system to allow adequate flow and to minimize clogging;
include leachate treatment and leak detection systems, as appropriate.
Q Document all CQA activities, including meetings, inspections, and repairs.
7B-36
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources
ASTM D-413. 1993. Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property-Adhesion to Flexible Substrate.
ASTM D-422. 1990. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis ol Soils.
ASTM D-638. 1991. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties ol Plastics.
ASTM D-698. 1991. Test Method lor Laboratory Compaction Characteristics ol Soil Using Standard
Effort (12,400 lt-lbl/lt3 (600 kN-m/m3)).
ASTM D-751. 1989. Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics.
ASTM D-882. 1991. Standard Test Methods for Tensile Properties olThin Plastic Sheeting.
ASTM D-1004. 1990. Standard Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance ol Plastic Film and Sheeting.
ASTM D-1557. 1991. Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics olSoil Using Modified
Effort (56,000 lt-lbl/lt3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).
ASTM D-4318. 1993. Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index ol
Soils.
ASTM D-4354. 1989. Standard Practice for Sampling ol Geosynthetics for Testing.
ASTM D-4716. 1987. Standard Test Method for Constant Head Hydraulic Transmissivity (In-Plane
Flow) ol Geotextiles and Geotextile Related Products.
ASTM D-5084. 1990. Standard Test Method for Measurement ol Hydraulic Conductivity ol Saturated
Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter.
ASTM D-5199. 1991. Standard Test Method for Measuring Nominal Thickness ol Geotextiles and
Geomembranes.
ASTM D-5261. 1992. Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area ol Geotextiles.
ASTM D-5321. 1992. Standard Test Method for Determining the Coefficient ol Soil and Geosynthetic
or Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method.
7B-37
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources (cont.)
Bagchi, A. 1994. Design, Construction, and Monitoring of Landfills.
Berg, R., and L. Well. 1996. A Position Paper on: The Use of Geosynthetic Barriers in Nonhazardous
Industrial Waste Containment.
Berger, E. K. and R. Berger. 1997. The Global Water Cycle.
Borrelli, J. and D. Brosz. 1986. Effects of Soil Salinity on Crop Yields.
Boulding, J.R. 1995. Practical Handbook of Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground Water Contamination:
Assessment, Prevention and Remediation. Lewis Publishers.
Brandt, R.C. and K.S. Martin. 1996. The Food Processing Residual Management Manual. September.
Daniel, D.E., and R.M. Koerner. 1991. Landfill Liners from Top to Bottom. Civil Engineering. December.
Daniel, D.E., and R.M. Koerner. 1993. Technical Guidance Document: Quality Assurance and Quality
Control for Waste Containment Facilities. Prepared for U.S. EPA. EPA600-R-93-182.
Daniel, D.E., and R.M. Koerner. 1995. Waste Containment Facilities: Guidance for Construction, Quality
Assurance and Quality Control of Liner and Cover Systems.
Evanylo, G.K. and W L. Daniels. 1996. The Value and Suitability of Papermill Sludge and Sludge
Compost as a Soil Amendment and Soilless Media Substitute. Final Report. The Virginia Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Room 402, Richmond, VA. April.
Federal Test Method Standard 101C. 1980. Puncture Resistance and Elongation Test (1/8 Inch Radius
Probe Method).
Fipps, G. 1995. Managing Irrigation Water Salinity in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.
Geosynthetic Research Institute. 1993. GRI-GCL1, Swell Measurement of the Clay Component of GCLs.
Geosynthetic Research Institute. 1993. GRI-GCL2, Permeability of Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs).
7B-38
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources (cont.)
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. 1988. Guidelines for Land Application of Municipal and
Industrial Wastewater. March.
Koerner, R.M. 1994. Designing with Geosynthetics, Third Edition.
McGrath, L., and P. Creamer. 1995. Geosynthetic Clay Liner Applications in Waste Disposal
Facilities.
McGrath, L., and P. Creamer. 1995. Geosynthetic Clay Liner Applications. Waste Age. May.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Waste Characterization Unit. 1991. Guidance for Land
Application of Wastewater Sludge in Michigan. March.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Waste Characterization Unit. 1991. Guide to Preparing
a Residuals Management Plan. March.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 1993. Land Treatment of Landfill Leachate. February.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1996. Nutrient Management
Software: Proceedings from the Nutrient Management Software Workshop. NRAES-100. December.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1996. Animal Agriculture and
the Environment: Nutrients, Pathogens, and Community Relations. NRAES-96. December.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1993. Utilization of Food
Processing Residuals. Selected Papers Representing University, Industry, and Regulatory
Applications. NRAES-69. March.
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 1994. Soil facts: Careful Soil Sampling - The Key to
Reliable Soil Test Information. AG-439-30.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. Title 252. Oklahoma Administrative Code,
Chapter 647. Sludge and Land Application of Wastewater.
Sharma, H., and S. Lewis. 1994. Waste Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills:
Design and Evaluation.
Smith, M.E., S. Purdy and M. Hlinko. 1996. Some Do's and Don'ts of Construction Quality
Assurance. Geotechnical Fabrics Report. January/February
7B-39
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources (cont.)
Spellman, F. R. 1997. Wastewater Biosolids to Compost.
Texas Water Commission. 1983. Industrial Solid Waste Management Technical Guideline No. 5: Land
Application. December.
Tsinger, L. 1996. Chemical Compatibility Testing: The State ol Practice. Geotechnical Fabrics Report.
October/November.
University ol Nebraska Cooperative Extension Institute ol Agriculture and Natural Resources. 1991.
Guidelines for Soil Sampling. G91-1000-A. February.
U.S. EPA. 2001. Technical Resource Document: Assessment and recommendations for Improving the
Performance ol Waste Containment Systems. Draft.
U.S. EPA. 1996a. Issue Paper on Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs).
U.S. EPA. 1996b. Report ol 1995 Workshop on Geosynthetic Clay Liners. EPA600-R-96-149. June.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. A Guide to the Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule. EPA832-B-93-
005. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Decision Maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management. Volume II. EPA530-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. Laboratory Methods lor Soil and Foliar Analysis in Long-Term Environmental
Monitoring Programs. EPA600-R-95-077.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. Process Design Manual: Land Application ol Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage.
EPA625-R-95-001. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995e. Process Design Manual: Surface Disposal ol Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage.
EPA625-R-95-002. September.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA832-R-93-003.
September.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Biosolids Recycling: Beneficial Technology for a Better Environment. EPA832-R-94-
009. June.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. Guide to Septage Treatment and Disposal. EPA625-R-94-002. September.
7B-40
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1994d. Land Application of Sewage Sludge: A Guide for Land Appliers on the Requirements
of the Federal Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR Part 503. EPA831-B-93-
002b. December.
U.S. EPA. 1994e. Seminar Publication: Design, Operation, and Closure of Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills. EPA625-R-94-008.
U.S. EPA. 1993a. Domestic Septage Regulatory Guidance: A Guide to the EPA 503 Rule. EPA832-B-92-
005. September.
U.S. EPA. 1993b. Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual. EPA530-R-93-017.
U.S. EPA. 1993c. Technical Guidance Document: Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Waste
Containment Facilities. EPA600-R-93-182.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge. EPA625-R-92-013.
December.
U.S. EPA. 199la. Seminar Publication: Design and Construction of RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers.
EPA62 5-4-91-02 5.
U.S. EPA. 199Ib. Seminar Publication: Site Characterization for Subsurface Remediation. EPA625-4-91-
026.
U.S. EPA. 199Ic. Technical Guidance Document: Inspection Techniques for the Fabrication of
Geomembrane Field Seams. EPA530-SW-91-051.
U.S. EPA. 1990. State Sludge Management Program Guidance Manual. October.
U.S. EPA. 1989a. Seminar Publication: Requirements for Hazardous Waste Landfill Design,
Construction, and Closure. EPA625-4-89-022.
U.S. EPA. 1989b. Seminar Publication: Corrective Action: Technologies and Applications. EPA625-4-89-
020.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Lining of Waste Containment and Other Impoundment Facilities. EPA600-2-88-052.
U.S. EPA. 1987. Geosynthetic Guidance for Hazardous Waste Landfill Cells and Surface Impoundments.
EPA600-2-87-097.
7B-41
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1986a. Project Summary: Avoiding Failure of Leachate Collection and Cap Drainage Systems.
EPA600-S2-86-058.
U.S. EPA. 1986b. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods. EPASW-846.
U.S. EPA. 1983. Process Design Manual for Land Application of Municipal Sludge. EPA625-1-83-016.
October.
U.S. EPA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of Interior, and U.S. Department of
Agriculture. 1981. Process Design Manual for Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater. EPA625-1-81-
013. October.
U.S. EPA. 1979. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA600-4-79-020.
Viessman Jr., W and MJ. Hammer. 1985. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th ed.
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. Guidelines for Preparation of Engineering Reports for
Industrial Wastewater Land Application Systems. Publication #93-36. May.
Webber, M.D. and S.S. Sing. 1995. Contamination of Agricultural Soils. In Action, D.F. and LJ.
Gregorich, eds. The Health of Our Soils.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1996. Chapter NR 518: Landspreading of Solid Waste. April.
7B-42
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
Appendix
Geosynthetic Materials25
Geotextiles
Geotextiles form one of the two largest
group of geosynthetics. Their rise in growth
during the past fifteen years has been nothing
short of awesome. They are indeed textiles in
the traditional sense, but consist of synthetic
fibers rather than natural ones such as cotton,
wool, or silk. Thus biodegradation is not a
problem. These synthetic fibers are made into
a flexible, porous fabric by standard weaving
machinery or are matted together in a ran-
dom, or nonwoven, manner. Some are also
knit. The major point is that they are porous
to water flow across their manufactured plane
and also within their plane, but to a widely
varying degree. There are at least 80 specific
application areas for geotextiles that have been
developed; however, the fabric always per-
forms at least one of five discrete functions:
1. Separation
2. Reinforcement
3. Filtration
4. Drainage
5. Moisture barrier (when impregnated)
Geogrids
Geogrids represent a rapidly growing seg-
ment within the geosynthetics area. Rather
than being a woven, nonwoven or knit textile
(or even a textile-like) fabric, geogrids are
plastics formed into a very open, gridlike
configuration (i.e., they have large apertures).
Geogrids are either stretched in one or two
directions for improved physical properties or
made on weaving machinery by unique
methods. By themselves, there are at least 25
application areas, however, they function
almost exclusively as reinforcement materials.
Geonets
Geonets, called geospacers by some, con-
stitute another specialized segment within the
geosynthetic area. They are usually formed by
a continuous extrusion of parallel sets of
polymeric ribs at acute angles to one another.
When the ribs are opened, relatively large
apertures are formed into a netlike configura-
tion. Their design function is completely
within the drainage area where they have
been used to convey fluids of all types.
Geomembranes
Geomembranes represent the other largest
group of geosynthetics and in dollar volume
their sales are probably larger than that of
geotextiles. Their growth has been stimulated
by governmental regulations originally enact-
ed in 1982. The materials themselves are
"impervious" thin sheets of rubber or plastic
material used primarily for linings and covers
of liquid- or solid-storage facilities. Thus the
primary function is always as a liquid or
vapor barrier. The range of applications, how-
ever, is very great, and at least 30 individual
applications in civil engineering have been
developed.
Geosynthetic Clay Liners
Geosynthetic clay liners (or GCLs) are the
newest subset within geosynthetic materials.
They are rolls of factory fabricated thin layers
of bentonite clay sandwiched between two
geotextiles or bonded to a geomembrane.
Structural integrity is maintained by needle
punching, stitching or physical bonding.
They are seeing use as a composite compo-
25 Created by Geosynthetic Research Institute. Accessed from the Internet on October 16, 2001 at
.
7B-43
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing and Installing Liners
nent beneath a geomembrane or by them-
selves as primary or secondary liners.
Geopipe (aka Buried Plastic Pipe)
Perhaps the original geosynthetic material
still available today is buried plastic pipe. This
"orphan" of the Civil Engineering curriculum
was included due to an awareness that plastic
pipe is being used in all aspects of geotechni-
cal, transportation, and environmental engi-
neering with little design and testing
awareness. This is felt to be due to a general
lack of formalized training. The critical nature
of leachate collection pipes coupled with high
compressive loads makes geopipe a bona-fide
member of the geosynthetics family. The func-
tion is clearly drainage.
Geocompos/fes
A geocomposite consists of a combination
of geotextile and geogrid; or geogrid and
geomembrane; or geotextile, geogrid, and
geomembrane; or any one of these three
materials with another material (e.g.,
deformed plastic sheets, steel cables, or steel
anchors). This exciting area brings out the
best creative efforts of the engineer, manufac-
turer, and contractor. The application areas
are numerous and growing steadily. The
major functions encompass the entire range
of functions listed for geosynthetics discussed
previously: separation, reinforcement, filtra-
tion, drainage, and liquid barrier.
"Geo-Others"
The general area of geosynthetics has
exhibited such innovation that many systems
defy categorization. For want of a better
phrase, geo-others, describes items such as
threaded soil masses, polymeric anchors, and
encapsulated soil cells. As with geocompos-
ites their primary function is product-depen-
dent and can be any of the five major
functions of geosynthetics.
7B-44
-------
Part IV
Protecting Ground Water
Chapter 7: Section C
Designing A Land Application Program
-------
-------
Contents
I. Identifying Waste Constituents for Land Application 7C-2
II. Evaluating Waste Parameters 7C-4
A. Total Solids Content 7C-4
B. pH 7C-5
C. Biodegradable Organic Matter 7C-6
D. Nutrients 7C-6
E. Metals 7C-8
F. Carbon-to-Nitrogen Ratio 7C-8
G. Soluble Salts 7C-9
H. Calcium Carbonate Equivalent 7C-11
I. Pathogens 7C-11
III. Measuring Soil Properties 7C-12
IV Studying the Interaction of Plants and Microbes with Waste 7C-14
A. Greenhouse and Field Studies 7C-15
B. Assessing Plant and Microbial Uptake Rates 7C-16
C. Effects of Waste on Plant and Microbe Growth 7C-17
D. Grazing and Harvesting Restrictions 7C-18
V Considering Direct Exposure, Ecosystem Impacts, & Bioaccumulation of Waste 7C-18
VI. Accounting for Climate 7C-19
VII. Calculating An Agronomic Application Rate 7C-19
VIIi.Monitoring 7C-21
IX. Odor Controls 7C-22
Designing a Land Application Program Activity List 7C-23
Resources 7C-24
Tables:
Table 1: Summary of Important Waste Parameters 7C-4
Table 2: Salinity Tolerance of Selected Crops 7C-10
Table 3: EC and SAR Levels Indicative of Saline, Sodic, and Saline-Sodic Soils 7C-11
Figures:
Figure 1: A Recommended Framework for Evaluating Land Application 7C-3
Figure 2: The Nitrogen Cycle 7C-7
-------
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Designing A Land Application Program
This chapter will help you:
• Assess the risks associated with waste constituents when consider-
ing application directly to the land as a soil amendment, or for
treatment, or disposal.
• Account for the designated ground-water constituents identified in
Chapter 7, Section A—Assessing Risk, as well as other waste para-
meters such as soil properties and plant and microbial interactions.
• Evaluate the capacity of the soil, vegetation, and microbial life to
safely assimilate the waste when developing an application rate.
j i. . i i Ł . i Some of the benefits of land application
and application can be a beneficial . FF
and practical method for treating and mc u
T :;
• disposing of some wastes. Because • Biodegradation of waste. If a waste
I land application does not rely on lin- stream contains sufficient organic
_^_^^TS to contain waste, however, there material, plants and microorganisms
are some associated risks. With proper planning can significantly biodegrade the
and design, a land application program can waste, assimilating its organic compo-
meet waste management and land preservation nents into the soil. After allowing suf-
goals, and avoid negative impacts such as nox- ficient time for assimilation of the
ious odors, long-term damage to soil, and waste, more waste can be applied to a
releases of contaminants to ground water, sur- given site without significantly
face water, or the air. This chapter describes and increasing the total volume of waste at
recommends a framework for addressing a vari- the site. This is in contrast to landfills
ety of waste parameters, in addition to the con- and waste piles, in which waste accu-
stituents outlined in Chapter 7, Section mulates continually and generally
A—Assessing Risk,1 and other factors such as does not biodegrade quickly enough
soil properties and plant and microbial nutrient to reduce its volume significantly.
use2 that can affect the ability of the land to T i • fi- -j T ^ v
r, 11111 * Inclusion of liquids. Land applica-
sately assimilate directly applied waste. . . , n
r -.-.-. , ,, tion units can accept bulk, non-con-
Successtul land application programs address . . , ,. . , ^,
, rr „ / br tamenzed liquid waste. The water
the interactions among all these factors.
1 The constituents incorporated in IWEM, including the heavy metals and synthetic organic chemicals,
typically have little or no agricultural value and can threaten human health and the environment even
in small quantities. The term "waste parameters" as used in this section refers to some additional con-
stituents such as nitrogen and biodegradable organic matter and other site-specific properties such as
pH, that can have considerable agricultural significance and that can significantly impact human health
and the environment.
2 40 CFR Part 503 specifies requirements for land application of sludge from municipal sewage treatment
plants. The Part 503 regulations apply to sewage sludge (now generally referred to as "biosolids") or
mixtures of sewage sludge and industrial process wastes, not to industrial wastes alone. Some of the
specifications in Part 503, for example those concerning pathogens, might be helpful in evaluating land
application of industrial wastes. For mixtures of sewage sludge and industrial waste, the ground-water
and air risk assessments and the framework laid out in the Guide can help address constituents that are ~ir "\
not covered under the Part 503 regulations.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
content of some liquid wastes make
them desirable at land application
sites in arid climates. When managing
liquid waste, land application can
reduce the need for expensive dewa-
tering processes.
• Improvement of soil. Applying waste
directly to land can improve soil qual-
ity if the waste contains appropriate
levels of biodegradable organic matter
and nutrients. Nutrients can improve
the chemical composition of the soil
to the extent that it can better support
vegetation, while biodegradable organ-
ic matter can improve its physical
properties and increase its water
retention capacity. This potential for
chemical and physical improvements
through land application have led to
its use in conditioning soil for agricul-
tural use.
Figure 1 outlines a framework for evaluat-
ing land application. This framework incorpo-
rates both the ground-water risk assessment
methodology recommended in Chapter 7,
Section A-Assessing Risk, as well as the other
waste parameters and factors important to
land application.
I. Identifying
Waste
Constituents for
Land Application
If a waste leachate contains any of the con-
stituents covered in the IWEM ground-water
model, you should first check with a federal,
state, or other regulatory agency to see if the
waste constituents identified in the waste are
covered by any permits, MOUs, or other agree-
ments concerning land application. The Guide
does not supersede or modify conditions estab-
lished in regulatory or other binding mecha-
nisms, such as MOUs or agreements.3
Some wastes might be designated by state
or local regulators as essentially equivalent to
a manufactured product or raw material. Such
designations usually are granted only when
use of the designated waste would not present
a greater environmental and health risk than
would use of the manufactured or raw materi-
al it replaces. Equivalence designations are
included in the category of "other agreements"
above. If there are no designated ground-water
constituents other than those on which the
designation is based, then the guidelines
described in this chapter can help you to
determine an appropriate application rate.
If the constituent(s) identified in the waste
is not currently covered under an agreement,
IWEM or another site-specific model can help
you determine whether land application of the
constituent(s) will be protective of ground
water. In some cases, pollution prevention or
treatment can lower constituents levels so that
a waste can be land applied. In other cases,
land application might not be feasible. In this
event, you should pursue other waste manage-
ment options. If your modeling results indi-
cate that the constituents can be land applied,
then the guidelines described in this chapter
can once again help you to determine an
appropriate application rate.
Your modeling efforts should consider both
the direct exposure and ecosystem pathways.
These pathways are extremely important in
land application since waste is placed on the
land and attenuated by the natural environ-
ment rather than contained by an engineered
structure.
7C-2
EPA has signed agreements with states, industries, and individual sites concerning land application. One
example is EPAs Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the American Forest and Paper
Association (AFPA) and the U.S. EPA Regarding the Implementation of the Land Application Agreements
Among AF&PA Member Pulp and Paper Mills and the U.S. EPA, January 1994. For more information on
this MOU contact either AFPAs Director of Industrial Waste Programs at 111 19th Street, NW,
Washington, D.C. 20036 or EPAs Director of the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Figure 1. A Recommended Framework for Evaluating Land Application
Perform waste characterization
• Ground-water constituents
• Other waste parameters
Identify waste constituents
Follow terms of
permit, MOU,
or agreement
Yes
Are all IWEM constituents identified in the waste
covered by permit, MOU, or other agreement?*
Evaluate waste
parameters
Measure soil
parameters
Study interaction of
plants and microbes
with waste
Consider direct expo-
sure, ecosystem
impacts, and bioaccu-
mulation of waste
Account for climate
Calculate agronomic
application rate
Evaluate application
rate. If waste stream
exceeds rate, consider
additional management
measures
Yes
No
Evaluate IWEM constituents identified in
the waste to determine whether land appli-
cation is protective of ground water using
IWEM or other risk assessment tool
No
Constituents should not be land applied
and you should treat wastes and
reassess land application potential or
identify other disposal options
* All constituents should have been
assessed and shown not to be a risk, or are
addressed by constituents directly covered
by MOU, permit, or other agreement.
7C-3
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
II. Evaluating
Waste
Parameters
In addition to the ground-water con-
stituents designated in Chapter 7, Section
A-Assessing Risk, you should evaluate the
waste's total solids content, pH, biodegradable
matter, pathogens, nutrients, metals, carbon
to nitrogen ratio, soluble salts, and calcium
carbonate equivalent when considering land
application. These parameters provide the
basis for determining an initial waste applica-
tion rate and are summarized in Table 1. After
the initial evaluation, you should sample and
characterize the waste on a regular basis and
after process changes that might affect waste
characteristics to help determine whether you
should change application practices or con-
sider other waste management options.
A. Total Solids Content
Total solids content indicates the ratio of
solids to water in a waste. It includes both
suspended and dissolved solids, and is usual-
ly expressed as a percentage of the waste.
Table 1
Summary of Important Waste Parameters
Waste Parameter Significance
Total solids content
pH
Biodegradable organic matter
Nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus,
and potassium)
Carbon to nitrogen ratio
Soluble salts
Calcium carbonate equivalent
Pathogens
Ground- water constituents
designated in Chapter 7, Section A-
Risk Assessment including metals
and organic chemicals
Indicates ratio of solids to water in waste and influences application
method.
Controls metals solubility (and therefore mobility of metals toward
ground water) and affects biological processes.
Influences soil's water holding capacity cation exchange, and other
physical and chemical properties, including odor.
Affect plant growth; nitrogen is a major determinant of application rate;
can contaminate ground water or cause phytotoxicity if applied in
excess.
Influences availability of nitrogen to plants.
Can inhibit plant growth, reduce soil permeability and contaminate
ground water.
Measures a waste's ability to neutralize soil acidity.
Can threaten public health by migrating to ground water or being car-
ried by surface water, wind, or other vectors.
Can present public health risk through ground-water contamination,
direct contact with waste-soil mix, transport by surface water, and
accumulation in plants. Metals inhibit plant growth and can be
phytotoxic at elevated concentrations. Zinc, copper, and nickel are
micronutrients essential to plant growth, but can inhibit growth at high
levels.
7C-4
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Total solids content depends on the type of
waste, as well as whether the waste has been
treated prior to land application. If waste is
dried, composted, dewatered, thickened, or
conditioned prior to land application, water
content is decreased, thereby increasing the
total solids content (for some dry, fine, partic-
ulate wastes, such as cement kiln dust, condi-
tioning might involve adding water).4
Understanding the total solids content will
help you develop appropriate storage and
handling procedures and establish an applica-
tion rate. Total solids content also can affect
your choice of application method and equip-
ment. Some methods, such as spray irriga-
tion, might not work effectively if the solids
content is too high. If it is low, meaning liq-
uid content is correspondingly high, waste
transportation costs could increase. If the
total solids content of the waste is expected
to vary, you can select equipment to accom-
modate materials with a range of solids con-
tent. For example, selecting spreaders that
will not clog if the waste is slightly drier than
usual will help operations run more efficient-
ly and reduce equipment problems.
B. pH
A waste's pH is a measure of its acidic or
alkaline quality. Most grasses and legumes, as
well as many shrubs and deciduous trees,
grow best in soils with a pH range from 5.5
to 7.5. If a waste is sufficiently acidic or alka-
line5 to move soil pH out of that range, it can
hamper plant growth. Acidic waste promotes
leaching of metals, because most metals are
more soluble under acidic conditions than
neutral or alkaline conditions. Once in solu-
tion, the metals would be available for plant
uptake or could migrate to ground water.
Alkaline conditions inhibit movement of
most metals. Extreme alkalinity, where pH is
greater than 11, impairs growth of most soil
•/-.^aiss
Source: Ag-Chem Equipment Co., Inc.
Reprinted with permission
Source: Ag-Chem Equipment Co., Inc.
Reprinted with permission
Source: Ag-Chem Equipment Co., Inc.
Reprinted with permission
microorganisms and can increase the mobility
of zinc, cadmium, and lead.
Aqueous waste with a pH of 2 or less or a
pH of 12.5 or more meets the definition of
hazardous waste under federal regulations (40
CFR 261.22(a)). If the pH of a waste makes it
too acidic for land application, you can con-
sider adjusting waste pH before application.
Lime is often used to raise pH, but other
materials are also available. The pH is also
important to consider when developing waste
handling and storage procedures.
4 Some states consider composted materials to no longer be wastes. Consult with the regulatory agency
for applicable definitions.
5 A pH of 7 is neutral. Materials with pH less than 7 are acidic, while those with pH greater than 7 are
alkaline.
7C-5
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
C. Biodegradable Organic
Matter
Wastes containing a relatively high percent-
age of biodegradable organic matter have
greater potential as conditioners to improve
the physical properties of soil. The percentage
of biodegradable organic matter in soil is
important to soil fertility as organic matter
can add nutrients; serve as an absorption and
retention site for nutrients; and provide chem-
ical compounds, such as chelating agents, that
help change nutrients into more plant-avail-
able forms. The content of biodegradable
organic matter is typically expressed as a per-
centage of sample dry weight.
Biodegradable organic matter also influ-
ences soil characteristics. Soils with high
organic matter content often have a darker
color (ranging from brown to black), increased
cation exchange capacity—capacity to take up
and give off positively charged ions—and
greater water holding capacity. Biodegradable
organic matter also can help stabilize and
improve the soil structure, decrease the density
of the material, and improve aeration in the
soil. In addition, organic nutrients are less like-
ly than inorganic nutrients to leach.
How can biodegradable organic
matter affect the waste applica-
tion rate?
While organic materials provide a signifi-
cant source of nutrients for plant growth,
decomposition rates can vary significantly
among materials. Food processing residues, for
example, generally decompose faster than
denser organic materials, such as wood chips.
It is important to account for the decomposi-
tion rate when determining the volume, rate
and frequency of waste application. Loading
the soil with too much decomposing organic
matter (such as by applying new waste before
a previous application of slowly decomposing
waste has broken down) can induce nitrogen
deficiency (see section D. below) or lead to
anaerobic conditions.
D. Nutrients
Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are
often referred to as primary or macro-nutri-
ents and plants use them in large amounts.
Plants use secondary nutrients, including sul-
fur, magnesium, and calcium, in intermediate
quantities. They use micronutrients, includ-
ing iron, manganese, boron, chlorine, zinc,
copper, and molybdenum, in very small
quantities. Land application is often used to
increase the supply of these nutrients, espe-
cially the primary nutrients, in an effort to
improve plant growth.
Nutrient levels are key determinants of
application rates. Excessive soil nutrient lev-
els, caused by high waste application rates,
can be phytotoxic or result in contamination
of ground water, soil, and surface water.
Nutrient loading is dependent on nutrient
levels in both the waste and the soil, making
characterization of the soil, as well as of the
waste, important.
Nitrogen. Nitrogen content is often the
primary factor determining whether a waste
is agriculturally suitable for land application,
and, if so, at what rate to apply it. Nitrogen
deficiency is detrimental to the most basic
plant processes, as nitrogen is an essential
element for photosynthesis. Sufficient nitro-
gen promotes healthy growth and imparts a
dark green color in vegetation. Lack of nitro-
gen can be identified by stunted plant growth
and pale green or yellowish colored vegeta-
tion. Extreme nitrogen deficiency can cause
plants to turn brown and die. On the other
extreme, excessive nitrogen levels can result
in nitrate leaching, which can contaminate
ground-water supplies.
7C-6
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Although nitrate poses the greatest threat
to ground water, nitrogen occurs in a variety
of forms including ammonium, nitrate,
nitrite, and organic nitrogen. These forms
taken together are measured as total nitrogen.
You should account for the ever-occurring
nitrogen transformations that take place in
the soil before and after waste is applied.
These transformations are commonly
described as the nitrogen cycle and are illus-
trated below in Figure 2.
Figure 2. The Nitrogen Cycle
Nitrites (N02
Leaching
Phosphorus. Phosphorus plays a role in
the metabolic processes and reproduction of
plants. When soil contains sufficient quanti-
ties of phosphorus, root growth and plant
maturation improve. Conversely, phospho-
rus-deficient soils can cause stunted plant
growth. Excessive phosphorus can lead to
inefficient use of other nutrients and, at
extreme levels, zinc deficiency. High phos-
phorus usage on crops and its associated
runoff into surface water bodies has increased
the biological productivity of surface waters
by accelerating eutrophication, which is the
natural aging of lakes or streams brought on
by nutrient enrichment.6 Eutrophication has
been identified as the main cause of impaired
surface water quality in the United States.
Potassium. Potassium is an essential
nutrient for protein synthesis and plays an
important role in plant hardiness and disease
tolerance. In its ionic form (K+), potassium
helps to regulate the hydration of plants. It
also works in the ion transport system across
cell membranes and activates many plant
enzymes. Like other nutrients, symptoms of
deficiencies include yellowing, burnt or
dying leaves, as well as stunted plant growth.
Symptoms of potassium deficiency also, in
certain plants, can include
reduced disease resistance and
winter hardiness.
How can I take nutrient
levels into account?
You should develop a nutri-
ent management plan that
accounts for the amount of
nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium being supplied by all
sources at a site. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation
Service has developed a conser-
vation practice standard
"Nutrient Management" Code 590 that can
be used as the basis for your nutrient man-
agement plan. The purpose of this standard
is to budget and supply nutrients for plant
production, to properly utilize manure or
organic by-products as a plant nutrient
source, to minimize agricultural nonpoint
source pollution of surface and ground-water
resources, and to maintain or improve the
physical, chemical, and biological condition
of the soil. Updated versions of this standard
can be obtained from the Internet at
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
amount of any of the plant nutrients. If, how-
ever, waste application rates are based solely
on nitrogen levels, resulting levels of other
nutrients such as phosphorus and potassium
can exceed crop needs or threaten ground
water or surface water bodies. You should
avoid excessive nutrient levels by monitoring
waste concentrations and soil buildup of
nutrients and reducing the application rate as
necessary, or by spacing applications to allow
plant uptake between applications. Your
local, state, or regional agricultural extension
service might have already developed materi-
als on or identified software for nutrient
management planning. Consult with them
about the availability of such information.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering
Services (NRAES) Cooperative Extension, for
example, has compiled information on nutri-
ent management software programs.7
E. Metals
A number of metals are included in IWEM
for evaluating ground-water risk. Some metals,
such as zinc, copper, and manganese, are
essential soil micronutrients for plant growth.
These are often added to inorganic commercial
fertilizers. At excessive concentrations, howev-
er, some of these metals can be toxic to
humans, animals, and plants. High concentra-
tions of copper, nickel, and zinc, for example,
can cause phytotoxicity or inhibit plant
growth. Also, the uptake and accumulation of
metals in plants depends on a variety of plant
and soil factors, including pH, biodegradable
organic matter content, and cation exchange
capacity. Therefore, it is important to evaluate
levels of these metals in waste, soil, and plants
from the standpoint of agricultural significance
as well as health and environmental risk.
How can I determine acceptable
metal concentrations?
The Tier I and II ground-water models can
help you identify acceptable metals concentra-
tions for land application. Also it is important
to consult with your local, state, or regional
agriculture extension center on appropriate
nutrient concentrations for plant growth. If the
risk evaluation indicates that a waste is appro-
priate for land application, but subsequent soil
or plant tissue testing finds excessive levels of
metals, you can consider pretreating the waste
with a physical or chemical process, such as
chemical precipitation to remove some metals
before application.
F. Carbon-to-Nitrogen Ratio
The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio refers to the
relative quantities of these two elements in a
waste or soil. Carbon is associated with
organic matter, and the carbon-to-nitrogen
ratio reflects the level of inorganic nitrogen
available. Plants cannot use organic nitrogen,
but they can absorb inorganic nitrogen such
as ammonium. For many wastes, the carbon-
to-nitrogen ratio is computed as the dry
weight content of organic carbon divided by
the total nitrogen content of waste.
Some wastes rich in organic materials (car-
bon) can actually induce nitrogen deficien-
cies. This occurs when wastes provide carbon
in quantities that microbes cannot process
without depleting available nitrogen. Soil
microbes use carbon to build cells and nitro-
gen to synthesize proteins. Any excess organ-
ic nitrogen is then converted to inorganic
nitrogen, which plants can use. The carbon-
to-nitrogen ratio tells whether excess organic
nitrogen will be available for this conversion.
When the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio is less
than 20 to 1—indicating a high nitrogen con-
tent—organic nitrogen is mineralized, or con-
7C-8
Nutrient Management Software: Proceedings from the Nutrient Management Software Workshop. To
order, call NRAES at 607 255-7654 and request publication number NRAES-100.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
verted from organic nitrogen to inorganic
ammonium, and becomes available for plant
growth. For maximal plant growth, the litera-
ture recommends maintaining a ratio below
20 to 1. When the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio is
in the range of 20 to 1 to 30 to 1—a low
nitrogen content—soil micro-organisms use
much of the organic nitrogen to synthesize
proteins, leaving only small excess amounts
to be mineralized. This phenomenon, known
as immobilization, leaves little inorganic
nitrogen available for plant uptake. When the
carbon-to-nitrogen ratio is greater than 30 to
1, immobilization is the dominant process,
causing stunted plant growth. The period of
immobilization, also known as nitrogen or
nitrate depression, will vary in length
depending on the decay rate of the organic
matter in the waste. As a result, plant growth
within that range might not be stunted, but is
not likely to be maximized.
How can I manage changing
carbon-to-nitrogen ratios?
The cycle of nitrogen conversions within
the soil is a complex, continually changing
process (see Figure 2). As a result, if applying
waste based only on assumed nitrogen miner-
alization rates, it is often difficult to ensure
that the soil contains sufficient inorganic
nitrogen for plants at appropriate times. If
you are concerned about reductions in crop
yield, you should monitor the soil's carbon-
to-nitrogen ratio and, when it exceeds 20 to
1, reduce organic waste application and/or
supplement the naturally mineralized nitro-
gen with an inorganic nitrogen fertilizer, such
as ammonium nitrate. Methods to measure
soil carbon include EPA Method 9060 in Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods—SW-846. Nitrogen
content can be measured with simple labora-
tory titrations.
G. Soluble Salts
The term soluble salts refers to the inorganic
soil constituents (ions) that are dissolved in the
soil water. Major soluble salt ions include calci-
um (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), sodium (Na+),
potassium (K+), chloride (Cf), sulfate (SO42~),
bicarbonate (HCCy), and nitrate (NCy). Total
dissolved solids (TDS) refers to the total
amount of all minerals, organic matter, and
nutrients that are dissolved in water. The solu-
ble salt content of a material can be determined
by analyzing the concentration of the individ-
ual constituent ions and summing them, but
this is a lengthy procedure. TDS of soil or
waste can reasonably be estimated by measur-
ing the electrical conductivity (EC) of a mixture
of the material and water. EC can be measured
directly on liquid samples. TDS is found by
multiplying the electrical conductivity reading
in millimhos/cm (mmhos/cm) by 700 to give
TDS in parts per million (ppm) or mg/1.
Soluble salts are important for several rea-
sons. First, saline soil, or soil with excessive
salt concentrations, can reduce plant growth
and seed germination. As salt concentration
in soil increases, osmotic pressure effects
make it increasingly difficult for plant roots to
extract water from the soil. Through a certain
range, this will result in reduced crop yield,
up to a maximum beyond which crops will
be unable to grow. The range and maximum
for a few representative crops are shown in
Table 2. For this reason, the salt content of
the waste, rather than its nitrogen content,
can be the primary determinant of its agricul-
tural suitability for land application, especial-
ly on irrigated soils in arid regions.
The second reason soluble salts are impor-
tant is that sodic soil, or soil with excessive
levels of sodium ions (Na+) relative to diva-
lent ions (Ca2+, Mg2+), can alter soil structure
and reduce soil permeability. The sodium
absorption rate (SAR) of a waste is an indica-
tor of its sodicity To calculate the SAR of a
7C-9
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
7C-10
Table 2:
Salinity Tolerance of Selected Crops
0% yield
reduction11
(mmhos/cm)athat
50% yield
reduction11
result in:
100% yield
reduction11
Alfalfa
Bermuda grass
Clover
Perennial rye
Tall fescue
2.0
6.9
1.5
5.6
3.9
8.8
14.7
10.3
12.1
13.3
16
23
19
19
32
Source: Borrelli, J. and D. Brosz. 1986. Effects of Soil Salinity on Crop Yields.
a A rule of thumb from the irrigation industry holds that soil salinity will be 11/2 times the salinity of applied
irrigation water. The effect that waste salinity will have on soil salinity, however, is not as easily predicted
and depends on the waste's water content and other properties and on the application rate.
b Reductions are stated as a percentage of maximum expected yield.
waste or soil, determine the Na+, Ca2+, and
Mg2+ concentrations in milliequivalents per
liter8 for use in the following equation:9
SAR =
Na+
Mg2+)
Soils characterized by both high salts
(excessive TDS as indicated by EC) and
excessive sodium ions (excessive Na+ as indi-
cated by SAR) are called saline -sodic soils,
and can be expected to have the negative
characteristics of both saline soils and sodic
soils described above. Table 3 displays EC
and SAR levels indicative of saline, sodic, and
saline -sodic soils.
The third reason soluble salts are impor-
tant is that specific ions can induce plant tox-
icities or contaminate ground water. Sodium
and chloride ions, for example, can become
phytotoxic at high concentrations. To assess
sodic- or toxic-inducing characteristics, you
should conduct an analysis of specific ions in
addition to measuring EC.
What can I do if a waste is either
saline or sodic?
Saline waste. If a waste is saline, careful
attention to soil texture, plant selection, and
application rate and timing can help. Coarse
soils often have a lower clay content and are
less subject to sodium-induced soil structure
The term milliequivalents per liter (meq/1) expresses the concentration of a dissolved substance in
terms of its combining weight. Milliequivalents are calculated for elemental ions such as Na+, Ca2+, and
Mg2+ by multiplying the concentration in mg/1 by the valence number (1 for Na+, 2 for Ca2+ or Mg2+)
and dividing by the atomic weight (22.99 for Na+, 40.08 for Ca2+, or 24.31 for Mg2+).
If the proper equipment to measure these concentrations is not available, consider sending soil and
waste samples to a soil testing laboratory, such as that of the local extension service (visit for contact information) or nearby university. Such a laboratory will be
able to perform the necessary tests and calculate the SAR.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Table 3
EC and SAR Levels Indicative of Saline, Sodic, and Saline-Sodic Soils
Normal Saline Sodic Saline-Sodic
EC" < 4 and
SARb< 13
EC>4
SAR> 13
EC > 4 and
SAR> 13
Source: Fipps, G. Managing Irrigation Water Salinity In the Lower Rio Grande Valley.
In units of mmhos/cm bdimensionless
problems. While coarse soils help minimize
soil structural problems associated with salin-
ity, they also have higher infiltration and per-
meability rates, which allow for more rapid
percolation or flushing of the root zone. This
can increase the risk of waste constituents
being transported to ground water.
Since plants vary in their tolerance to
saline environments, plant selection also is
important. Some plant species, such as rye
grass, canary grass, and bromegrass, are only
moderately tolerant and exhibit decreased
growth and yields as salinity increases. Other
plants, such as barley and bermuda grass, are
more saline-tolerant species.
You should avoid applying high salt con-
tent waste as much as possible. For saline
wastes, a lower application rate, and thor-
ough tilling or plowing can help dilute the
overall salt content of the waste by mixing it
with a greater soil volume. To avoid the
inhibited germination associated with saline
soils, it also can help to time applications of
high-salt wastes well in advance of seedings.
Sodic waste. SAR alone will not tell how
sodium in a waste will affect soil permeability;
it is important to investigate the EC of a waste
as well. Even if a waste has a high SAR, plants
might be able to tolerate this level if the waste
also has an elevated EC. As with saline waste,
for sodic waste select a coarser-textured soil to
help address sodium concerns. Adding gyp-
sum (CaSO4) to irrigation water can also help
to reduce the SAR, by increasing soil calcium
levels. Although this might help address sodi-
um-induced soil structure problems, if choos-
ing to add constituents to alter the SAR, the
EC should also be monitored to ensure salini-
ty levels are not increased too much.
H. Calcium Carbonate
Equivalent
Calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) is
used to measure a waste's ability to neutralize
soil acidity—its buffering capacity—as com-
pared with pure calcium carbonate. Buffering
capacity refers to how much the pH changes
when a strong acid or base is added to a solu-
tion. A highly buffered solution will show
only a slight change in pH when strong acids
or bases are added. Conversely, if a solution
has a low buffering capacity, its pH will
change rapidly when a base or acid is added
to it. If a waste has a 50 percent CCE, it
would need to be applied at twice the rate of
pure calcium carbonate to achieve the same
buffering effect.
I. Pathogens
Potential disease-causing microorganisms
or pathogens, such as bacteria, viruses, proto-
zoa, and the eggs of parasitic worms, might
be present in certain wastes. Standardized
7C-11
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
testing procedures are available to help deter-
mine whether a waste contains pathogens.
You should consider using such tests espe-
cially if your process knowledge indicates
that a waste might contain pathogens. Fecal
coliform bacteria can be quantified, for exam-
ple, by using a membrane filtering technique,
which involves passing liquid waste through
a filter, incubating the filtrate (which contains
the bacteria) on a culture medium for 24
hours, and then counting the number of bac-
terial colonies formed.
How can I reduce pathogenic
risks?
Methods to reduce pathogenic risk include
disinfecting or stabilizing a waste prior to
land application. Examples of treatment
methods recognized for sewage sludge
stabilization are included in the sidebar.
Pathogens present a public health hazard if
they are transferred to food or feed crops,
contained in runoff to surface waters, or
transported away from a land application site
by vectors. If pathogen-carrying vectors are a
concern at a site, it is important to establish
measures to control them. For examples of
methods to control vectors, refer to Chapter
8-Operating the Waste Management System.
Additional information on pathogen reduc-
tion and methods to control vectors can be
obtained from 40 CFR 503.15 and 40 CFR
503.32 (EPA's Sewage Sludge Rule.) A dis-
cussion of these alternatives is available in
EPA's guidance document Land Application of
Sewage Sludge: A Guide for Land Appliers on
the Requirements of the Federal Standards for
the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR
Part 503 (U.S. EPA, 1994a).
The services of a qualified engineer might
be necessary to design an appropriate process
for reducing pathogens in a waste. You
should consult with the state to determine
whether there are any state-specific require-
What are methods for stabilizing
waste prior to land application?
The following methods, recommended
for stabilizing sewage sludge, can also be
useful for reducing pathogens in waste:
• Aerobic digestion
• Air drying
• Anaerobic digestion
• Composting
• Lime stabilization
More detailed information on each of
these and other methods can be found
in EPA's Control of Pathogens and Vector
Attraction in Sewage Sludge (U.S. EPA,
1992).
ments for pathogen reductions for specific
waste types.
Measuring Soil
Properties
Physical, biological, and chemical charac-
teristics of the soil are key factors in deter-
mining its capacity for waste attenuation. If
the soil is overloaded, rapid oxygen deple-
tion, extended anaerobic conditions, and the
accumulation of odorous and phytotoxic
end-products can impair soil productivity
and negatively impact adjacent properties.
With proper design and operation, waste can
be successfully applied to almost any soil;
however, sites with highly permeable soil
(e.g., sand), highly impermeable soil (e.g.,
clay), poorly drained soils, or steep slopes
can present special design issues. Therefore,
it is advisable to give such sites lower priority
during the site selection process.
7C-12
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
How can I evaluate the soil at a
site?
To help evaluate the soil properties of a
site, you should consult the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey for the
prospective area. These surveys provide infor-
mation on properties such as soil type and
permeability. USDA has prepared soil surveys
for most counties in each state. To obtain a
copy of the survey for an area, contact the
Natural Resource Conservation Service offices,
the county conservation district, the state agri-
cultural cooperative extension service, or local
health authorities/planning agency. These soils
surveys will help during site selection; howev-
er, conditions they describe can differ from
the actual soil conditions.
Several guidance documents on soil sur-
veys are also available from USDA. These
documents include the National Soil Survey
Handbook and the guide Soil Taxonomy: A
Basic System of Soil Classification for Making
and Interpreting Soil Surveys. The National Soil
Survey Handbook provides an abundance of
information including help on interpreting
soil surveys, a primer on soil properties and
soil quality, and guides for predicting the per-
meability of your soil. Both of these docu-
ments are available over the Internet and can
be obtained from .
For more site-specific data on actual soil
conditions, you can sample and characterize
the soil. It might be desirable to have a quali-
fied soil scientist perform this characteriza-
tion, which often includes soil texture,
percentage of organic matter, depth to water
table, soil pH, and cation exchange capacity.
At a minimum, you should characterize sam-
ples from an upper soil layer, 0 to 6 inches,
and a deeper soil layer, 18 to 30 inches, and
follow established soil sampling procedures to
obtain meaningful results. If a detailed charac-
terization is desired, or if it is suspected soil
types vary considerably, further subdivision of
soil horizons or collection of samples over a
greater variety of depths might be appropriate.
For more information about how to obtain
representative soil samples and to submit
them for analysis, you can consult EPAs
Laboratory Methods for Soil and Foliar Analysis
in Long-Term Environmental Monitoring
Programs (U.S. EPA, 1995d), or state guides,
such as Nebraska's Guidelines for Soil Sampling,
G91-1000.
Why are chemical and biological
properties of soil important?
Chemical and biological properties of the
soil, like those of the waste, influence the
attenuation of waste constituents. These
properties include pH, percentage of organic
matter, and cation exchange capacity. Affected
attenuation processes in the soil include
absorption, adsorption, microbial degrada-
tion, biological uptake, and chemical precipi-
tation. For example, adsorption—the process
by which molecules adhere to the surface of
other particles, such as clay—increases as the
cation exchange capacity and pH of the soil
increase. Cation exchange capacity, in turn, is
dependent on soil composition, increasing as
the clay content of the soil increases.
Adsorption through cation exchange is an
important means of immobilizing metals in
the soil. Organic chemicals, on the other
hand, are negatively charged and can be
adsorbed through anion exchange, or the
exchange of negative ions. A soil's capacity for
anion exchange increases as its pH decreases.
Why are physical properties of
soil important?
Physical properties of the soil such as tex-
ture, structure, and pore-size distribution affect
infiltration rates and the ability of soil to filter
or entrap waste constituents. Infiltration and
permeability rates decrease as clay content
7C-13
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
increases. Sites with soils with permeabilities
that are too high or too low have lower land
application potential. Soils with high perme-
ability can allow wastes to move through with-
out adequate attenuation. Soils with low
permeability can cause pooling or excessive
surface runoff during intense rainstorms.
Excessive runoff conditions can be compensat-
ed for somewhat by minimizing surface slope
during site selection. Soils with low perme-
ability are also prone to hydraulic overloading.
The amount of liquid that can be assimi-
lated by a soil system is referred to as its
hydraulic loading capacity. In addition to a
soil's permeability hydraulic loading capacity
is dependent on other factors such as cli-
mate, vegetation, site characteristics, and
other site-specific soil properties such as soil
type, depth to seasonally high water table,
slope and credibility water intake rate, and
underlying geology and hydrogeology.
Exceeding the hydraulic loading capacity of a
site, can lead to rapid leaching of waste con-
stituents into ground water, reduction in bio-
logical activity, sustained anaerobic
conditions, soil erosion, and possible conta-
mination of surface waters. It can also result
in excessive evaporation, which can cause
excessive odor and unwanted airborne emis-
sions. In order to avoid hydraulic overload-
ing at a site, application of liquid or
semi-liquid waste or wastewater should be
managed so uncontrolled runoff or prolonged
saturation of the soil does not occur.
An important indicator of soil properties is
its topography, which affects the potential for
soil erosion and contaminated surface-water
runoff. Soils on ridge tops and steep slopes
are typically well drained, well aerated, and
shallow. Steep slopes, however, increase the
likelihood of surface runoff of waste and of
soil erosion into surface waters. State guide-
lines, therefore, often specify the maximum
slopes allowable for land application sites for
various waste characteristics, application
techniques, and application rates. The agen-
cies that regulate land application in a state
can provide specific guidance concerning
slopes. Soils on concave land and broad flat
lands, on the other hand, frequently are
poorly drained and can be waterlogged dur-
ing part of the year. Soils in relatively flat
areas can have intermediate properties with
respect to drainage and runoff and could be
more suitable for land application.
IV. Studying the
Interaction of
Plants and
Microbes with
Waste
The next step in the design of a land
application unit is to consider the plants and
microbes at the site and how they will inter-
act with the waste. This interaction includes
the uptake and degradation of waste con-
stituents, the effects of the wastes on plant
and microbial growth, and changes that can
occur in plants or crops affecting their use as
food or feed. The uptake of nutrients by
plants and microbes on plant roots or in soil
affects the rate of waste assimilation and
biodegradation, usually increasing it.
It might be necessary to conduct green-
house or field studies or other tests of plants,
soil, and microbes to understand and quanti-
fy these interactions. You should consult with
the state agricultural department, the local
health department, and other appropriate
agencies if considering land application of
wastes containing designated ground-water
constituents or other properties that are
potentially harmful to food or feed crops.
Industry groups might also be able to pro-
vide information about plants with which
they have land application experience.
7C-14
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
A. Greenhouse and Field
Studies
State agricultural extension services, depart-
ments of environmental protection, or public
universities might have previous studies about
plant uptake of nutrients, especially nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium, but it is impor-
tant to recognize that the results of studies
conducted under different conditions (such as
different waste type, application rate, plant
type, or climate) are only partially relevant to a
specific situation. Furthermore, most studies to
date have focused on relatively few plant
species, such as corn, and only a handful of
constituents, typically metals. Greenhouse
studies or pilot-scale field studies attempt to
model site-specific conditions by growing the
intended crops in soil from the prospective
application site. These studies are useful
because individual parameters can be varied,
such as plant type and waste application rate,
to determine the effects of each factor.
Additionally, greenhouse or field studies might
be required by some states to certify that a
waste has agricultural benefits. Generally, the
first point of contact for assistance with studies
is the state agricultural extension service. Many
state extensions can conduct these studies;
others might be able to provide guidance or
expertise but will recommend engaging a pri-
vate consultant to conduct the studies.
How do I conduct greenhouse or
field studies?
Currently no national guidelines exist for
conducting greenhouse or field studies,10 but
check to see if the state has guidance on
accepted practices. Working with a state agri-
cultural extension service or a local university
will provide the benefit of their expertise and
experience with local conditions, such as
which plants are suitable for local soils and
climate. If a particular industry sector has a
large presence in a state, the state agricultural
extension service might have previous experi-
ence with that specific type of waste.
Greenhouse studies. Aside from their
smaller scale, greenhouse studies differ from
field studies primarily in that they are con-
ducted indoors under controlled conditions,
while field studies are conducted under nat-
ural environmental conditions. A greenhouse
study typically involves distributing represen-
tative soil samples from the site into several
pots to test different application rates, appli-
cation methods, and crops. Using several
duplicate pots for each rate, method, or crop
allows averaging and statistical aggregating of
results. It is also important to establish con-
trol pots, some with no waste and no plants,
others with waste but no plants (to observe
the extent to which waste assimilation effects
are due to soil and pre-existing microbes) and
still others with plants but without waste (as
a baseline for comparison with waste-amend-
ed plant growth).
To the
extent
feasible,
tempera-
ture,
mois-
ture, and
other
parame-
ters should simulate actual site conditions.
There should be a series of several duplicate
pots grown with each combination of plant
type, application rate, and other parameters.
Pots should be arranged to avoid environ-
mental conditions disproportionately affecting
one series of pots. For example, you should
avoid placing a whole series of pots in a row
closest to a light source; instead, it is better to
place one pot from each of several series in
that row or randomize placement of pots.
The controlled greenhouse environment
allows the study of a wide range of waste-soil
10 Based on conversations with Dr. Rufus L. Chaney and Patricia Milner, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
7C-15
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
interactions without risking the loss of plants
due to weather, animal hazards, and other
environmental influences. At the same time,
this can introduce differences from actual
conditions. Root confinement, elevated soil
temperature, and rapidly changing moisture
levels, for example, can increase the uptake
of pollutants by potted plants compared to
uptake under field conditions.11
Field studies. Field studies, on the other
hand, can test application rates and crops on
plots at the actual proposed site. As with
greenhouse studies, duplicate plots are useful
for statistical purposes, and controls are
needed. Field study data can be more useful
because it more closely reflects real-world
conditions, but it also can be more difficult
to obtain because of uncontrollable circum-
stances such as flooding or unusual pest
damage that can occur at the time of the
study. Field studies also can be subject to sit-
ing, health and safety, and permitting
requirements.
Field studies also help determine the actu-
al land area required for land application and
the quality of runoff generated. Soil and
ground-water monitoring help to confirm
that waste constituents are being taken up by
plants and not leaching into the ground
water. Results from field studies, however,
might not be duplicated on actual working
plots after multiple waste applications, due to
long-term soil changes. Crop yields also can
vary by as much as 15 to 25 percent under
field conditions, even with good fertility and
management.
Both greenhouse and field studies typically
include extensive sampling of waste, soil
before application, plants or representative
parts of plants, soil after application, growth
of plants, and, to the extent feasible, water.
You should sample soil at the surface and in
lower horizons using core sampling. Some
soil tests require mixing samples with water
to form a paste or slurry. Plant tissue tests
often require dry-weight samples, made by
drying cut plants at about 65°C. Water can
be collected in lysimeters (buried chambers
made from wide perforated pipe) and
removed using hand pumps.
The effects of waste on organisms in the
soil can also be monitored during greenhouse
and field studies. The literature suggests, that
the effects of waste on earthworms are a good
indicator of effects on soil organisms in gen-
eral. It might be worthwhile, therefore, to
stock greenhouse pots or field study plots
with earthworms at the beginning of a study
and monitor the waste constituent levels and
the effects on the worms during and at the
end of the study. Although these brief studies
will not effectively model long-term exposure
to waste constituents, it is possible to gauge
short-term and acute effects.
B. Assessing Plant and
Microbial Uptake Rates
Plants. After performing studies, you
should measure the amounts of various
nutrients, metals, and other constituents in
tissue samples from plants grown in the
greenhouses or on test plots. This tells
approximately how much of these con-
stituents the plants extracted from the soil-
waste mix. By measuring plant-extracted
quantities under these various conditions,
you can determine a relationship between
11 If a waste contains VOCs, ensure the possibility of VOCs accumulating within the enclosed greenhouse
is addressed.
7C-16
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
plant type, application rate, and nutrient
extraction. From this, you can choose the
conditions which result in the desired uptake
rate while avoiding uptake of designated
ground-water constituents at undesirable
concentrations. Plant uptake is often mea-
sured as a ratio of the pollutant load found in
the plants to the pollutant load applied to the
land as illustrated below:
fig pollutant kg pollutant
per
g dry plant tissue
hectare
This ratio serves to place pollutant uptake
in the context of the original amount of pol-
lutant applied.
In choosing plants for a land application
unit, you should also consider growing seasons
in relation to periods of waste application rate.
Specific waste application rates associated with
corresponding uptakes of nutrients by plants,
as indicated in greenhouse or field studies, are
applicable only during the growing phases cov-
ered by the study. At other times, waste appli-
cation might be infeasible because plants are
not present to help assimilate waste, or because
plants are too large to permit passage of appli-
cation equipment without sustaining damage.
Microbes. Certain microbes can biode-
grade organic chemicals and other waste con-
stituents. Some accomplish this by directly
using the constituents as a source of carbon
and energy, while others co-metabolize con-
stituents in the process of using other com-
pounds as an energy source. Aerobic microor-
ganisms require oxygen to metabolize waste
and produce carbon dioxide and water as end
products. Anaerobic microbes function with-
out oxygen but produce methane and hydro-
gen sulfide as end products. These gases can
present a safety risk as well as environmental
threats, and hydrogen sulfide is malodorous.
For these reasons, it is recommended that
you maintain conditions that favor aerobic
microbes.
For many microorganisms, these condi-
tions include a pH of 6 to 8 and temperatures
of 10°C to 30°C. In addition, microbes might
be unable to transfer oxygen from soil effi-
ciently if the moisture content is near satura-
tion, or they might be unable to obtain
sufficient water if the soil is too dry. A water
content of 25 to 85 percent of the soil's water
holding capacity is recommended in the liter-
ature. Oxygen generally is available through
diffusion from the atmosphere, but this
mechanism might provide insufficient oxygen
if there is too little pore space (less than 10
percent of soil volume) or if so much organic
matter is applied that oxygen is consumed
faster than it is replaced.
C. Effects of Waste on
Plant and Microbe
Growth
Greenhouse and field studies can tell what
effect the waste will have on plant growth pat-
terns. A typical method of quantifying plant
growth is to state it in terms of biomass pro-
duction, which is the dry weight of the cut
plants (or representative parts of the plants). If
the plants grown with waste applications
show greater mass than the control plants,12
the waste might be providing useful nutrients
or otherwise improving the soil. If the plants
grown with waste applied at a certain rate
12 Trends detected in studies assume that results have been subjected to tests of statistical validity before
finding a trend significant.
7C-17
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
weigh less than the controls, some con-
stituent(s) in the waste might be excessive at
the studied application rate. Comparing the
results from several different application rates
can help find the rate that maximizes growth
and avoids detrimental and phytotoxic effects.
Analyzing soil and water after plant growth
allows for a comparison between the planted
pots or plots against the control to discern the
differences due to plant action. If water sam-
ples show excessive nutrient (especially nitro-
gen) levels at a certain application rate, this
might indicate that the plants were unable to
use all the nutrients in the waste applied at
that rate, suggesting that the application was
excessive. If soil and water tests show that
constituents are consumed, and if other possi-
ble causes can be ruled out, microbes might
be responsible. Further investigation of
microbial action might involve sampling of
microbes in soil, counting their population,
and direct measurement of waste constituents
and degradation byproducts.
D. Grazing and Harvesting
Restrictions
If a waste might contain pathogens or des-
ignated ground-water constituents, and the
established vegetative cover on the land
application site is intended for animal con-
sumption, it is important to take precautions
to minimize exposure of animals to these
contaminants. This is important because ani-
mals can transport pathogens and ground-
water constituents from one site to another,
and can be a point of entry for waste con-
stituents and pathogens into the food chain.
If harvesting crops from a unit for use as
animal fodder, you should test plants for the
presence of undesirable levels of the desig-
nated ground-water constituents before feed-
ing. Grazing animals directly on a unit is
discouraged by some states.13 If considering
direct grazing, you should consult with the
state to see if there are any restrictions on
this practice. Growing crops for human con-
sumption on soil amended with waste calls
for even greater caution. In some states, this
practice is prohibited or regulated, and in
states where it is allowed, finding food
processors or distributors willing to purchase
such crops can be difficult.
When testing crops before feeding them
to animals, local agricultural extension ser-
vices might be able to help determine what
levels are appropriate for animal consump-
tion. If plant tissue samples or findings of a
fate and transport model indicate waste con-
stituent levels inappropriate for animal con-
sumption, it is important that you not use
harvested plants as fodder or allow grazing
on the site. Additionally, plants with high
constituent levels will probably be inappro-
priate for other agricultural use, and thus
would likely necessitate disposal of such
crops as a waste after harvest.
V. Considering
Direct Exposure,
Ecosystem
Impacts, &
Bioaccumulation
of Waste
You should evaluate the impacts that your
land application unit will have on direct
exposure and ecological pathways as well as
the potential for bioaccumulation of land-
applied waste. During the land application
unit's active life, direct human exposure to
waste or waste-amended soil is primarily a
risk to personnel involved in the operation.
You should follow OSHA standards and
ensure that personnel are properly trained
and use proper protective clothing and equip-
13 Grazing can also be unwise due to potential effects on soil physical structure. The weight of heavy ani-
mals can compact soil, decreasing pore space, which can reduce the soil's waste attenuation capacity.
7C-18
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
ment when working onsite. You should limit
direct exposure to others through steps such
as access control and vehicle washing to pre-
vent tracking waste and waste amended soil
off site.
Access control will also limit exposure of
some animals. If crops will be used for animal
fodder or grazing, you should test harvested
fodder for the designated ground-water con-
stituents before use and restrict grazing times.
After a site is closed, there might be long-term
access risks to future land uses and the gener-
al public. To minimize these risks, long-term
access controls or deed restrictions might be
appropriate. Consult Chapter 11—Performing
Closure and Post-Closure Care for further
information.
Direct exposure of native animals is often
impossible to control and might be an entry
point for the ground-water constituents into
the food chain. Worms, for example, might
be present in the soil and take in these con-
stituents. Birds or other animals could then
consume the worms, bioaccumulate, or be
transported off site. Furthermore, animals can
ingest plants grown on waste-amended soil.
Therefore, you should also consider pathways
such as these in evaluating your plans for
land application.
VI. Accounting for
Climate
Local climate considerations should also
enter into your land application planning
process. For example, wastes that are high in
soluble salts are less appropriate and can have
deleterious effects in arid climates due to the
osmotic pressure from the salts inhibiting root
uptake of water. On the other hand, the down-
ward movement of water in the soil is minimal
in arid climates, making the migration of waste
constituents to ground water less likely.
Climate also determines which plants can
grow in a region and the length of the grow-
ing season. If the local climate cannot sup-
port the plants that might be most helpful in
assimilating the particular constituents in a
given waste, the use of land application might
be limited to other crops at a lower applica-
tion rate. If the climate dictates that the part
of the growing cycle during which land appli-
cation is appropriate is short, a larger area for
land application might be necessary.
There are also operating considerations
associated with climate. Since waste should
not be applied to frozen or very wet soil, the
application times can be limited in cold or
rainy climates. In climates where the ground
can freeze, winter application poses particular
problems even when the ground is not frozen,
because if the ground freezes soon after appli-
cation, the waste that remained near the soil
surface can run off into surface waters during
subsequent thaw periods. Waste nutrients are
also more likely to leach through the soil and
into the ground water following spring thaw,
prior to crop growth and nutrient uptake.
These problems can be partially solved by
providing sufficient waste storage capacity for
periods of freezing or rainy weather.
VII. Calculating An
Agronomic
Application Rate
The purpose of a land application unit
(i.e., waste disposal versus beneficial use)
helps determine the waste application rate
best suited for that unit. When agricultural
benefits are to be maximized, the application
rate is governed by the agronomic rate. The
objective for determining an agronomic appli-
cation rate is to match, as closely as possible,
the amount of available nutrients in the waste
with the amount required by the crop. One
7C-19
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
example of an equation for calculating agro-
nomic application rates is:
Agronomic application rate = (Crop nutri-
ent uptake x Crop yield)-Nutrient credits
Where:
Crop nutrient uptake = Amount of nutri-
ents absorbed by a particular crop. These
requirements are readily available from
your state and local Cooperative Extension
Offices
Crop yield = Amount of plant available for
harvest. Methods for calculating expected
yields include past crop yields for that
unit, county yield records, soil productivi-
ty tables, or local research.
Nutrient credits = Nitrogen residual from
past waste applications, irrigation water
nitrate nitrogen, nutrients from commer-
cial fertilizer, and other nitrogen credits
from atmospheric deposition from dust
and ammonia in rainwater.
In addition, many states and universities
have developed their own worksheets or cal-
culations for developing an agronomic appli-
cation rate. You should check with your state
agency to see if you are subject to an existing
regulation. In setting a preliminary applica-
tion rate the crop's nitrogen requirements
often serve as a ceiling, but in some cases,
phosphorus, potassium, or salt content, rather
than nitrogen, will be the limiting factor.
How do I determine the agro-
nomic rate?
Computer models can help determine site-
specific agronomic rates. Modeling nitrogen
levels in waste and soil-plant systems can help
provide information about physical and
hydrologic conditions and about climatic
influences on nitrogen transformations.
Models recommended for use with sewage
sludge include Nitrogen Leaching and
Economic Analysis Package (NLEAP);
DECOMPOSITION; Chemicals, Run-Off, and
Erosion from Agricultural Management
Systems (CREAMS); and Ground-Water
Loading Effects of Agricultural Management
Systems (GLEAMS).14 NLEAP is a moderately
complex, field scale model that assesses the
potential for nitrate leaching under agricultur-
al fields. NLEAP can be used to compare
nitrate leaching potential under different soils
and climates, different cropping systems, and
different management scenarios. The comput-
er model DECOMPOSITION is specifically
designed to help predict sewage sludge nitro-
gen transformations based on sludge charac-
teristics, as well as climate and soil properties
(organic matter content, mean soil tempera-
ture, and water potential). Finally, the
CREAMS and GLEAMS models, developed by
the USDA, are other potentially useful models
to assist with site-specific management of land
application operations. Additional computer
models include Cornell Nutrient Management
Planning System (NMPS), Fertrec Plus v 2.1,
and Michigan State University Nutrient
7C-20
14 All of these models are referenced in EPA's Process Design Manual: Land Application of Sewage Sludge and
Domestic Septage (U.S. EPA, 1995b). According to that source, the NLEAP software, developed by
Shaffer et al, is included in the purchase of Managing Nitrogen for Ground-water Quality and Farm
Profitability by Follet, et al., which also serves as reference for information on parameters required for
nitrogen calculations. Four regional soil and climatic databases (Upper Midwest, Southern,
Northeastern, and Western) also are available on disk for use with NLEAP These materials can be
obtained from: Soil Science Society of America Attn: Book Order Department, 677 S. Segoe Road,
Madison, WI 53711, 608/273-2021; Book $36.00; Regional Databases $10.00 each. Current updates of
the NLEAP program can be obtained by sending original diskettes to: Mary Brodahl, USDA-ARS-GPSR,
Box E, Fort Collins, CO 80522. Additional information on the DECOMPOSITION model, developed
by Gilmour and Clark, can be obtained from: Mark D. Clark, Predictive Modeling, PO. Box 610,
Fayetteville, AR 72702. The CREAMS and GLEAMS models were developed by USDA.
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Management vl.l.15 If assistance is required in
determining an appropriate agronomic rate for
a waste, you should contact the regional, state,
or county agricultural cooperative extensions,
or a similar organization.
VIM. Monitoring
Monitoring ground water can be helpful to
verify whether waste constituents have migrat-
ed to ground water. Some state, tribal, or
other regulatory authorities require ground-
water monitoring at certain types of land
application units; you should consult with the
appropriate regulatory agency to determine
whether such a requirement applies to the
unit. Even if the unit is not required to moni-
tor ground water, instituting a ground-water
monitoring program is recommended for
long-term, multiple application units where
wastes contain the designated ground-water
constituents. Such units are more likely to
pose a threat to ground water than are single-
application units or units receiving waste
without these constituents.
In most cases, lysimeters should be suffi-
cient to monitor ground water. A lysimeter is
a contained unit of soil, often a box or cylin-
der in the ground which is filled with soil,
open on the top, and closed at the bottom, so
that the water that runs through it can be col-
lected. It is usually more simple and econom-
ical to construct and operate than a
monitoring well. You can consult with a qual-
ified professional to develop an appropriate
ground-water monitoring program for your
land application unit.
If ground-water results indicate unaccept-
able constituent levels, you should suspend
land application until the cause is identified.
You should then correct the situation that led
to the high readings. If a long-term change in
the industrial process, rather than a one-time
incident, caused the elevated levels, you
should reevaluate your use of land applica-
tion. Adjusting the application rate, adding
pretreatment, or switching to another means
of waste management might be necessary.
After reevaluation, you should examine
whether corrective action might be necessary
to remediate the contaminated ground water.
You should pay particular attention to ensure
that applications are not exceeding the soil's
assimilative capacity.
You should also consider testing soil sam-
ples periodically during the active life of a
land application unit. For this testing to be
meaningful, it is important that you first
determine baseline conditions by sampling
the soil before waste application begins. This
might already have been done in preparation
for greenhouse/field studies or for site charac-
terization. Later, when applying waste to the
unit, you should collect and analyze samples
at regular intervals (such as annually or after
a certain number of applications). Consider
analyzing samples for macronutrients,
micronutrients, and any of the designated
ground-water constituents reasonably expect-
ed to be present in the waste. The location
and number of sampling points, frequency of
sampling, and constituents to be analyzed
will depend on site-specific soil, water, plant,
and waste characteristics. Local agricultural
extension services, which have experience
with monitoring, especially when coupled
with ground-water monitoring, can detect
contamination problems. Early detection
allows time to change processes to remedy
the problems, and to conduct corrective
action if necessary before contamination
becomes widespread.
Testing soils after the active life of a unit
ends might also be appropriate, especially if
the waste is likely to have left residues in the
soil. The duration of monitoring after closure,
like the location and frequency of monitoring
during active life, is site-specific and depends
on similar factors. For further information
' These models are referenced in the Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative
Extension's Nutrient Management Software: Proceedings from the Nutrient Management Software
Workshop from December 11, 1996.
7C-21
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
about testing soil after the active life of a unit
ends, refer to Chapte 11—Performing
Closure and Post-Closure Care.
IX. Odor Controls
Odors are sometimes a common problem
at land application facilities and an odor
management plan can allow facility managers
to respond quickly and effectively to deal
with odor complaints. A plan should involve
working to prevent odors from occurring,
working with neighbors to resolve odor com-
plaints, and making changes if odors become
an unacceptable condition. The plan should
also identify the chemical odor constituents,
determine the best method for monitoring
odor, and develop acceptable odor thresh-
olds. These odor management plans can be
stand-alone plans or part of your company's
environmental management system.
To effectively deal with odor complaints, it
is important to consider creating an odor
detection and response team to identify the
source of, and quickly respond to, potential
nuisance odor conditions. Document the
problem as well as how it was or was not
resolved, and notify facility managers as soon
as possible. Odor complaints should be doc-
umented immediately in terms of the odor's
location, characteristics, the time and date,
existing meteorological conditions, suspected
specific source, information that indicates rel-
ative strength compared to other events, and
when during the day the odors are noticed.
Measuring odors can be accomplished in
two manners: olfactometry and analytical.
The olfactometry method uses trained indi-
viduals who determine the strength of an
odor. Both of these methods have advantages
and disadvantages. Some of the advantages of
the olfactometry method are that it is accu-
rately correlated with human response, it is
fast at providing a general chemical classifica-
tion, and it is usually cost effective as a field
screening method. Disadvantages include the
requirement of highly trained individuals,
and it does not address the chemistry of the
odor problem. Analytical methods use gas
chromatographs and mass spectrophotome-
ters to analyze vapor concentrations captured
from a sample. Some of the advantages of the
analytical method are that it allows detection
of odorants at levels near human detection, it
is precise and repetitive, and it provides
chemical specificity. Disadvantages include a
very high capital cost which might not accu-
rately correlate with human responses. You
should contact your state for more informa-
tion on odor management plans and measur-
ing odors.
7C-22
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Designing a Land Application
Program Activity List
Q Use the framework to design and evaluate a land application program and to help determine a pre-
liminary waste application rate.
Q Be familiar with waste parameters, such as total solids content, pH, organic matter, nutrients, car-
bon and nitrogen levels, salts, soil buffering capacity, and pathogens.
Q When examining potential application sites, give special consideration to physical and chemical
properties of soil, topography, and any site characteristics that might encourage runoff or odor.
Q Choose crops for the unit considering plant uptake of nutrients and constituents.
Q Account for climate and its effects.
Q Determine an agronomic application rate.
Q Evaluate ground-water and air risks from land application units and consider potential exposure
pathways.
Q Consider implementing a ground-water monitoring program and periodic sampling of unit soils.
7C-23
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Resources
Brandt, R.C. and K.S. Martin. 1996. The Food Processing Residual Management Manual. September.
Borrelli, J. and D. Brosz. 1986. Effects olSoil Salinity on Crop Yields.
Evanylo, G.K. and W L. Daniels. 1996. The Value and Suitability olPapermill Sludge and Sludge
Compost as a Soil Amendment and Soilless Media Substitute. Final Report. Virginia Department ol
Agriculture and Consumer Services. April.
Fipps, G. 1995. Managing Irrigation Water Salinity in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. .
Gage, J. 2000. Operating by Progressive Odor Management Plan. Biocycle Journal ol Composting &
Recycling. Vol. 41 No. 6. June.
Idaho Department ol Health and Wellare. 1988. Guidelines for Land Application ol Municipal and
Industrial Wastewater. March.
Michigan Department ol Natural Resources, Waste Characterization Unit. 1991. Guidance for Land
Application ol Wastewater Sludge in Michigan. March.
Michigan Department ol Natural Resources, Waste Characterization Unit. 1991. Guide to Preparing a
Residuals Management Plan. March.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 1993. Land Treatment ol Landfill Leachate. February.
Nagle, S., G. Evanylo, WL. Daniels, D. Beegle, and V Groover. Chesapeake Bay Regional Nutrient
Management Training Manual. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service. Crop & Soil Environmental
Sciences. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Blacksburg, VA. 1997.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1996. Nutrient Management
Software: Proceedings from the Nutrient Management Software Workshop. NRAES-100. December.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1996. Animal Agriculture and the
Environment: Nutrients, Pathogens, and Community Relations. NRAES-96. December.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Cooperative Extension. 1993. Utilization olFood
Processing Residuals. Selected Papers Representing University, Industry, and Regulatory Applications.
NRAES-69. March.
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 1994. Soil lacts: Carelul Soil Sampling—The Key to
Reliable Soil Test Information. AG-439-30.
7C-24
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Resources (cont.)
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. Title 252. Oklahoma Administrative Code, Chapter
647. Sludge and Land Application of Wastewater.
Rowell, D.L. 1994. Soil Science: Methods and Applications.
Striebig, B. and R. Giani. 2000. Briefing: The Odor Index and Its Use as a Management Tool for Biosolids
Land Application. Penn State University and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Texas Water Commission. 1983. Industrial Solid Waste Management Technical Guideline No. 5: Land
Application. December.
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 1991.
Guidelines for Soil Sampling. G91-1000-A. February.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. Agricultural
Phosphorus and Eutrophication. July.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. Conservation Practices
Standard: Nutrient Management, Code 590. April.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. Core Conservation
Practices, Part 2: Nutrient Management. August.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. National Soil Survey
Handbook. September.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic
System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. A Guide to the Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule. EPA832-B-93-
005. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Process Design Manual: Land Application of Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage.
EPA625-R-95-001. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. Process Design Manual: Surface Disposal of Sewage Sludge and Domestic Septage.
EPA625-R-95-002. September.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. Laboratory Methods for Soil and Foliar Analysis in Long-term Environmental
Monitoring Programs. EPA600-R-95-077.
7C-25
-------
Protecting Ground Water—Designing A Land Application Program
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Land Application of Sewage Sludge: A Guide for Land Appliers on the Requirements
of the Federal Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR Part 503. EPA831-B-93-
002b. December.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Guide to Septage Treatment and Disposal. EPA625-R-94-002. September.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA832-R-93-003.
September.
U.S. EPA. 1994d. Biosolids Recycling: Beneficial Technology for a Better Environment. EPA832-R-94-
009. June.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Domestic Septage Regulatory Guidance: A Guide to the EPA 503 Rule. EPA832-B-92-
005. September.
U.S. EPA. 1992. Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge. EPA625-R-92-013.
December.
U.S. EPA. 1990. State Sludge Management Program Guidance Manual. October.
U.S. EPA. 1983. Process Design Manual for Land Application of Municipal Sludge. EPA625-1-83-016.
October.
U.S. EPA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of Interior, and U.S. Department of
Agriculture. 1981. Process Design Manual for Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater. EPA625-1-81-
013. October.
U.S. EPA. 1979. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA600-4-79-020.
Viessman Jr., W and MJ. Hammer. 1985. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th ed.
Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. Guidelines for Preparation of Engineering Reports for
Industrial Wastewater Land Application Systems. Publication #93-36. May.
Webber, M.D. and S.S. Sing. 1995. Contamination of Agricultural Soils. In Action, D.F. and LJ.
Gregorich, eds. The Health of Our Soils.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1996. Chapter NR 518: Landspreading of Solid Waste.
April.
7C-26
-------
Part V
Ensuring Long-Term Protection
Chapter 8
Operating The Waste Management System
-------
-------
Contents
I. An Effective Waste Management System 8-1
II. Maintenance and Operation of Waste Management System Components 8-2
A. Ground-Water Controls 8-4
B. Surface-Water Controls 8-5
C. Air Controls 8-5
III. Operational Aspects of a Waste Management System 8-7
A. Operating Plan 8-7
B. Waste Analysis 8-8
C. Waste Inspections 8-8
D. Daily Cover 8-9
E. Placing Wastes 8-10
E Sludge Removal 8-10
G. Climate Considerations 8-11
H. Security Measures, Access Control, and Traffic Management 8-11
I. Providing Employee Training 8-12
J. Emergency Response Plan and Procedures 8-14
K. Record Keeping 8-16
L. Addressing Nuisance Concerns 8-17
Operating the Waste Management System Activity List 8-20
Resources 8-21
-------
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Operating the Waste Management System
This chapter will help you:
• Develop a waste management system that includes procedures
for monitoring performance and measuring progress towards
environmental goals. The waste management system should
identify operational procedures that are necessary to achieve
those environmental goals and to make continual improve-
ments in waste management operations.
Implementing a waste management sys-
tem that achieves protective environmen-
tal operations requires incorporating
performance monitoring and measure-
ment of progress towards environmental
goals. An effective waste management system
can help ensure proper operation of the many
interrelated systems on which a unit depends
for waste containment, leachate management,
and other important functions. If the elements
of an overall waste management system are not
regularly inspected, maintained, improved,
and evaluated for efficiency, even the best-
designed unit might not operate efficiently.
Implementing an effective waste management
system can also reduce long- and short-term
costs, protect workers and local communities,
and maintain good community relations.
This chapter will address the following
questions.
• What is an effective waste management
system?
• What maintenance and operational
aspects should be developed as part of
a waste management system?
I. An Effective
Waste
Management
System
Having an effective waste management sys-
tem requires an understanding of environ-
mental laws and an understanding of how to
comply with these laws. An effective waste
management system also requires that proce-
dures be in place to monitor performance and
measure progress towards clearly articulated
and well understood environmental goals.
Lastly, an effective waste management system
involves operational procedures that integrate
continual improvements in waste management
operations to ensure continued compliance
with environmental laws. In addition to what
is discussed in this chapter, you can consider
reviewing and implementing, as appropriate,
the draft voluntary standards for good envi-
ronmental practices developed by the
International Standards Organization (ISO).
The ISO 14000 series of standards identify
management system elements that are intend-
ed to lead to improved performance. These
include: a method to identify significant envi-
ronmental aspects; a policy that includes a
8-1
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
commitment to regulatory compliance, the
prevention of pollution, and continual
improvement; environmental objectives and
targets for all relevant levels and functions in
the organization; procedures to ensure perfor-
mance, as well as compliance procedures to
monitor and measure performance; and a sys-
tematic management review process.
The ISO 14000 series of standards include
a "specification" standard, ISO 14001. The
Additional Information on
ISO 14000
The ISO 14000 series of standards are
copyrighted and can be obtained by con-
tacting any of the following organizations:
American National Standards
Institute (ANSI)
1819 L Street, NW, 6th Floor
Washington, DC 20026
202 293-8020
American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM)
100 Bar Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
610 832-9585
American Society for Quality
Control (ASQC)
611 East Wisconsin Avenue
P.O. Box 3005
Milwaukee, WI 53201
800 248-1946
NSF International
P.O. Box 130140
789 N. Dixboro Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0140
800 NSF-MARK or 734 769-8010
rest are standards that provide optional guid-
ance for companies developing and imple-
menting management systems and product
standards. The ISO 14001 specification stan-
dard contains only those requirements that
can be objectively audited for certification,
registration, and self-declaration purposes. For
more information about EPAs involvement in
the ISO 14000 and 14001 standards, refer to
the ISO 14000 Resource Directory, October
1997, (U.S. EPA, 1997). Information on
obtaining the ISO 14000 series of standards is
provided in the text box above. An example of
an integrated EMS can be found at
.
II. Maintenance
and Operation of
Waste
Management
System
Components
All of the time and money invested in plan-
ning, designing, and developing a unit will be
jeopardized if proper operational procedures
are not carried out. Effective operation is
important for environmental protection, and
for reasons of economy, efficiency, and aes-
thetics. Operating control systems, therefore,
should be developed and maintained by the
facility operator to ensure efficient and protec-
tive operation of a waste management system.
These controls consist of the operator con-
ducting frequent inspections, performing rou-
tine maintenance, reporting inspection results,
and making necessary improvements to keep
the system functioning.
Unit inspections can help identify deterio-
ration of or malfunction in control systems.
Surface impoundments should be inspected
8-2
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
for evidence of overtopping, sudden drops in
liquid levels, ice formation, and deterioration
of dikes or other containment devices.
Overtopping, or the flowing of waste over the
top of the walls of an impoundment, can
occur as a result of insufficient freeboard,
wind or wave action, or other unusual condi-
tions including the formation and movement
of ice within a surface impoundment which
can also puncture or tear synthetic liners.
One method of protecting liners from ice
damage is to install a liner cover consisting of
sand and rip rap along the edge of the liner.
Another option is the use of a double liner
system. The higher cost of a double liner is
offset by reducing the need for rip rap and
offers enhanced ground-water protection.
Regardless of which method is implemented,
liner systems should be inspected for damage
and be repaired if necessary after periods of
ice formation. Also, make visual inspections
periodically to check waste levels, weather
conditions, or draining during periods of
heavy precipitation. In addition, it is impor-
tant to consider devising a contingency plan
to reinforce dikes when failure is imminent.
Waste piles and landfills should be
inspected for adequate surface-water protec-
tion systems, leachate seeps, dust suppression
methods, and daily covers, where applicable.
Land application sites should be inspected for
adequate surface-water protection systems
and dust suppression methods, as applicable.
Inspections of pipes, monitoring of mechani-
cal equipment, and safety, emergency, and
security devices will help to ensure that a
unit operates in a safe manner. In addition,
inspections often prevent small problems
from growing into more costly ones.
How should effective inspections
be conducted?
To help ensure that routine inspections are
performed regularly and consistently, consider
developing a written inspection schedule and
ensure that staff follow the schedule. The
schedule could state the type of inspections to
be conducted, the inspection methods to be
used, the frequency of the inspections, and a
plan of action highlighting preventative mea-
sures to address potential problems. Consider
conducting additional inspections after extra-
ordinary site-specific circumstances, such as
storms or other extreme weather conditions.
Staff conducting the inspections should
look for malfunctioning or deteriorating
equipment, such as broken sump pumps,
leaking fittings, eroding dikes, or corroded
pipes or tanks; discharges or leaks from
valves or pipes; and operator errors. A writ-
ten schedule for inspections should be main-
tained at the facility, and inspections should
be recorded in a log containing information
such as date of inspection, name of inspector,
conditions found, and recommended correc-
tive action. Inspection personnel should be
familiar with the inspection log to identify
any malfunctions or deficiencies that remain
uncorrected from previous inspections.
When designing an inspection form for a
unit, add appropriate items for the unit type.
You can check with the appropriate state reg-
ulatory agency to see if it has an inspection
form that can be used. For example, a landfill
form would include a section about waste
placement and a surface impoundment form
might have an entry for sufficient freeboard.
If ground water is monitored, you can make
ground-water monitoring part of the unit
inspection, and add check boxes for each
monitoring point to ensure that inspectors
collect samples from all monitoring points
according to the specified schedule. After an
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
inspection, it is important that all inspection
reports are reviewed in a timely manner so
that any necessary repairs and improvements
can quickly be identified and implemented.
You should consult with your state agency to
help determine if improvements are necessary.
A. Ground-Water Controls
Ground-water protection controls, such as
ground-water monitoring systems, unit covers,
leachate collection and removal systems, and
leak detection systems should be incorporated
into the design and construction of a unit.
Ground-water monitoring wells require
continued maintenance. A major reason for
maintenance is plugging of the gravel pack or
screen. (See Chapter 9-Monitoring
Performance for a discussion on the construc-
tion of ground-water monitoring wells.) The
most common plugging problems are caused
by precipitation of calcium or magnesium car-
bonates and iron compounds. Acid is most
commonly used to clean screens clogged with
calcium carbonate. In many instances, howev-
er, the cost of attempted restoration of a moni-
toring well can be more than the installation of
a new well. Because many wells are installed
in unconsolidated sand formations, silt and
clay can be pumped through the system and
cause it to fail. Silt and sand grains are abra-
sive and can damage well screens, pumps (if
present), flow meters, and other components.
In some cases, the well can fill with sedi-
ment and must be cleaned out. The most fre-
quent method of cleaning is to pull the pump
from the well, circulate clean water down the
well bore through a drop, and flush the sedi-
ment out. If large amounts of sediments are
expected to enter a monitoring well, consider
incorporating a sediment sump (also called a
silt trap or sediment trap) into the monitoring
well construction. The sump consists of a
blank section of pipe placed below the base of
the screen. Its purpose is to provide a catch-
trap for fine sand and silt which bypasses the
filter pack and screen and settles out within
the well. This sediment collects within the
sump rather than within the screen, and there-
fore, does not reduce the functional screened
length of the well and minimizes the need for
periodic cleanouts of the screen. Regardless of
the type of ground-water monitoring well
installed, the well should be protected with a
cap or plug at the upper end to prevent con-
densation, rust, and dirt from entering into the
manhole or protective casing. In addition, it is
important to inspect the outer portion of the
wells to ensure that they have not been dam-
aged by trucks or other unit operations, and to
ensure that the cap or plug is intact.
You also should inspect and maintain unit
covers to ensure that they are intact. For opti-
mal performance, covers should be designed
to minimize permeability, surface ponding,
and the erosion of cover material. The cover
should also prevent the buildup of liquids
within the unit. Consult Chapter
11-Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
for a more detailed discussion on maintaining
cover systems.
It is essential that all components of a
leachate collection and removal system and a
leak detection system be maintained properly.
The main components include the leachate
collection pipes, manholes, leachate collection
tanks and accessories, and pumps. You should
consider cleaning the leachate pipes once a
year to remove any organic growth and visual-
ly inspecting the manholes, tanks, and pumps
once a year as leachate can corrode metallic
parts. Annual inspections and necessary
repairs will prevent many future emergency
problems such as leachate overflow from the
tank due to pump failure. Maintain a record of
all repair activities as necessary to assess (or
claim) long-term warranties on pumps and
other equipment.
8-4
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
In surface impoundments, monitor waste
liquid levels. An unexpected decrease in liq-
uid levels can be an indication of a release
from the impoundment. If a surface
impoundment fails, it is important to discon-
tinue adding waste to the impoundment and
contain any discharge that has occurred or is
occurring. Repair leaks as soon as possible. If
leaks cannot be stopped, empty the
impoundment if possible. If the size of the
unit or amount of waste present prohibits
emptying, see Chapter 9-Monitoring
Performance and consult with state officials
about beginning an assessment monitoring
program. Clean up any released waste (see
Chapter 10-Taking Corrective Action) and
notify the appropriate state authorities of the
failure and the remedial actions taken.
B. Surface-Water Controls
If a unit has a point source discharge, the
unit must have a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) per-
mit (or equivalent) and, in some states, might
require a state discharge permit. Point source
discharges include the release of leachate
from a leachate collection or onsite treatment
system into surface waters, disposal of indus-
trial waste into surface waters, or release of
surface-water runoff (e.g., storm water) that is
directed by a runoff control system into sur-
face waters. Even if there are no point source
discharges, surface-water controls might be
necessary to prevent pollutants from being
discharged or leached into surface waters,
such as lakes and rivers. If a facility is dis-
charging wastewater to a local publicly
owned treatment works (POTW), check with
the POTW and local regulatory authorities to
determine whether pretreatment standards
exist for the facility.
Soil erosion and sedimentation controls,
such as ditches, berms, dikes, drains, and silt
fences, should be incorporated into the
design and construction of a unit. Berms or
dikes are often constructed from earthen
materials, concrete, or other materials
designed to be safely traversed during inspec-
tion or monitoring activities. Vegetation also
is often used for erosion control. Trees or
other deep rooted vegetation, however,
should not be used near liners or other struc-
tures that could be damaged by roots. Grass
is often used for soil stabilization around sur-
face impoundments. For a more detailed dis-
cussion of storm-water issues, consult
Chapter 6-Protecting Surface Water.
Most if not all of these surface-water con-
trols should be inspected by the operator reg-
ularly, especially after large storm events.
Structures should be maintained as installed
and any structural damage should be repaired
as soon as possible to prevent further damage
or erosion. Any trapped sediments should be
removed and disposed of properly. Vegetative
controls frequently need watering after planti-
ng and during periods of intense heat or lack
of rain.
C. Air Controls
Gases, including methane, carbon dioxide,
and hydrogen, are often produced at waste
management units as byproducts of the
microbial decomposition of wastes containing
organic material. Additionally, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) can be present in the
waste, and particulate emissions and dust can
be generated during unit operations. It is
important to analyze wastes carefully prior to
designing a waste management unit to deter-
mine what airborne emissions are likely to
come from these wastes. If airborne emission
controls are needed in the design of a unit,
maintenance of these controls should be con-
sidered as part of a waste management sys-
tem. For further information on airborne
emission controls, consult Chapter 5-
Protecting Air Quality.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Methane is a particular concern at some
waste management units. Methane is odorless
and can cause fires or explosions that can
endanger employees and damage structures
both on and off site. Hydrogen gas can also
form, and is also explosive, but it readily
reacts with carbon or sulfur to form methane
or hydrogen sulfide. Hydrogen sulfide can be
easily identified by its sulfur or "rotten egg"
smell. Methane, if not captured, will either
escape to the atmosphere or migrate under-
ground. Underground methane can enter
structures, where it can reach explosive con-
centrations or displace oxygen, creating the
danger of asphyxiation. Methane in the soil
profile can damage the vegetation on the sur-
face of the landfill or on the land surrounding
the landfill, thereby exposing the unit to
increased erosion. Finally, methane is a
potent "greenhouse" gas that contributes to
global warming.
Methane is explosive when present in the
ranges of 5 to 15 percent by volume in the
air. The 5 percent level is known as the lower
explosive limit (LEL) and 15 percent as the
upper explosive limit (UEL). At levels above
15 percent by volume, methane will not
explode when exposed to a source of igni-
tion. Levels above the UEL remain a concern,
however, as methane will burn at these con-
centrations and can still cause asphyxiation.
In the event that methane gas levels exceed
25 percent of the LEL in facility structures or
other closed spaces, initiate safety measures,
such as evacuating the site and structures. In
such cases, or when the methane level
exceeds 25 percent of the LEL in the soil at a
monitoring point, implement a remediation
plan to decrease gas levels and prevent future
buildup of gases.
Gas control systems generally include
mechanisms designed to control gas migra-
tion and to minimize the venting of gas emis-
sions into the atmosphere. Passive gas control
systems use natural pressure and convection
mechanisms to remove gas from the waste
management unit. Examples of passive gas
control system elements include ditches,
trenches, vent walls, perforated pipes sur-
rounded by coarse soil, synthetic membranes,
and high moisture, fine-grained soil. Active
gas control systems use mechanical means to
remove gas from the unit. Gas extraction
wells are an example of an active gas control
system.
Gas monitoring and extraction systems
require regular maintenance to operate effi-
ciently. As wastes settle over time, pipes can
fail and condensate outlets can become
blocked. Extracted gas is saturated, which
causes moisture to collect within the pipes.
Therefore, the condensate within the pipes
must be dealt with, otherwise it will affect the
pumping suction pressure. Since the plumb-
ing on the top of the unit is quite involved,
develop and adhere to a gas maintenance
schedule to ensure the efficient operation of
gas systems.
If generated gas is not removed from a
unit, uplift pressure can cause bubbles within
the unit that displace the cover soil at the
surface. Gas bubbles also can decrease the
normal stress between the geomembrane and
its underlying material leading to slippage of
the geomembrane and all overlying materials.
This creates high tensile stresses evidenced by
folding at the toe of the slope and tension
cracks near the top.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Operational
Aspects of a
Waste
Management
System
This section identifies and briefly discusses
some of the important operational aspects of
a waste management system, including devel-
oping an operating plan, performing waste
analyses and inspections, installing daily cov-
ers, placing wastes in a unit, removing
sludge, considering climate, implementing
security and access control measures, provid-
ing employee training, addressing nuisance
concerns, developing emergency response
plans and procedures, and maintaining
important records. Consider developing prac-
tices to ensure compliance with applicable
laws and regulations, to train workers how to
handle potential problems, and to ensure that
all necessary improvements or changes are
made to a waste management system. Proper
planning and implementation of these operat-
ing practices are important elements in the
efficient and protective operation of a unit.
A. Operating Plan
An operating plan should serve as the pri-
mary resource document for operating a
waste management unit. It should include the
technical details necessary for a unit to oper-
ate as designed throughout its intended
working life. At a landfill, for example, the
operating plan should illustrate the chrono-
logical sequence for filling the unit, and it
should be detailed enough to allow the facili-
ty manager to know what to do at any point
in the active life of the unit.
An operating plan should include:
• A daily procedures component.
• Lists of current equipment holdings
and of future equipment needs.
• Procedures to inspect for inappropri-
ate wastes and to respond when their
presence is suspected.
• Procedures for addressing extreme
weather conditions.
• Personnel needs and equipment uti-
lization, including backup.
• Procedures to address emergencies,
such as medical crises, fires, and spills.
• Quality control standards.
• Record keeping protocols.
• Means of compliance with local,
state, and federal regulations.
The daily procedures component of the plan
outlines the day-to-day activities necessary to
place waste, operate environmental controls,
and inspect and maintain the waste manage-
ment unit in accordance with its design. Daily
procedures should be concise enough to be cir-
culated among all employees at the unit and
flexible enough to allow for any adjustments
necessary to accommodate weather variability,
changing waste volume, and other contingen-
cies. You should revise and update daily proce-
dures as needed to ensure the unit's continued
safe operation within the parameters of the
overall operating plan.
Since a unit will likely operate for several
years, it is important that staff periodically
review the operating plan to refresh their
memories and to ensure long-term conformi-
ty with the plan. If modifications to the oper-
ating plan are necessary, the changes and the
date they were made should be noted within
the plan itself. Documented operating proce-
dures can be crucial, especially if questions
arise in the future regarding the adequacy of
site construction and management.
3-7
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
B. Waste Analysis
To effectively manage waste and ensure
proper handling (e.g., preventing the mixing
of incompatible wastes, use of incompatible
liners or containers), knowledge of the chem-
ical and physical composition of the wastes is
imperative. Determining waste characteristics
can be done by performing a comprehensive
waste analysis or through process knowledge.
To ensure that this information remains accu-
rate, it might be necessary to repeat the
analysis whenever there is a change in the
industrial process generating the waste. For
further information, consult Chapter
2-Characterizing Waste.
C. Waste Inspections
The purpose of performing waste inspec-
tions is to identify waste that might be inap-
propriate for the waste management unit, and
to prevent problems and accidents before
they happen. Hazardous wastes, PCBs, liq-
uids (in landfills and waste piles), and state-
designated wastes are prohibited from
disposal in units designated solely for indus-
trial nonhazardous waste. Some states have
developed more stringent screening require-
ments that require a spotter to be present at a
unit to detect unauthorized wastes and to
weigh and record incoming wastes.
As part of a waste management system,
screening procedures should be implemented
to prevent inappropriate wastes from entering
a unit. For units receiving waste exclusively
from on site, only limited waste screening
might be necessary. For facilities receiving
waste from off site, screening procedures typi-
cally call for screening waste as it enters a
unit. Ideally, all wastes entering a unit should
be screened, but this is not always practical or
necessary. A decision might be made, there-
fore, to screen a percentage of incoming
waste. It might be practical to use spot inspec-
An effective waste management system
relies on accurate knowledge of the waste
being handled.
tions, such as checking random loads of waste
on a random day each week or every incom-
ing load on one random day each month.
Base the frequency of random inspections on
the type and quantity of wastes expected to be
received, the accuracy and confidence desired,
and any state inspection requirements.
Inspections need to be performed prior to
placement of wastes in a unit.
Training employees to recognize inappro-
priate wastes during routine operations
increases the chances that inappropriate
waste arriving on non-inspection days will be
detected. Some indications of inappropriate
wastes are color, texture, or odor different
from those of the waste a unit normally
receives. Also, laboratory testing can be per-
formed to identify different wastes.
A waste management system should
include procedures to address suspected
inappropriate waste. The procedures to
implement, when inappropriate wastes are
found, should include the following:
• Segregate the suspicious wastes.
• Use appropriate personal protective
equipment.
• Contact the part of the industrial
facility that generated the waste to
find out more about it.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
• Contact laboratory support to analyze
the waste, if required.
• Call the appropriate state, tribal or
federal agencies in accordance with
the opertaing plan.
• Notify a response agency, if necessary.
Should liquids be restricted from
being placed in some units?
Bulk or containerized liquids should not
be placed in landfills or waste piles, as liquids
increase the potential for leachate generation.
Liquid waste includes any waste material
determined to contain free liquids as defined
by Method 9095 (also known as the paint fil-
ter test) in EPA's Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-
846). Sludges are a common waste that can
contain significant quantities of liquids. You
should consider methods such as drying beds
to dewater sludges prior to placement in
landfills and waste piles.1
D. Daily Cover
It might be necessary to apply a daily
cover to operating landfills and waste piles.
Covering the waste helps control nuisance
factors, such as the escape of odors, dust, and
airborne emissions, and can control the pop-
ulation of disease vectors where necessary.
Some cover materials, due to their ability to
hold moisture, can reduce the infiltration of
rain water, decreasing the generation of
leachate and the potential for surface-water
and ground-water contamination.
How is daily cover applied?
Covers most often consist of earthen mate-
rial, although there are several alternative
daily covers being used in the industry today
Inspect waste to ensure that hazardous
waste is not placed in a unit.
including coproducts,2 foam, geotextiles, and
plastic sheets or tarps. Examples of coprod-
ucts that have been used as daily cover
include granular wastes, automobile shredder
fluff, foundry sand, dewatered sludges, and
synthetic soils. When using coproduct covers
that can themselves contain contaminants,
ensure that run-on is either diverted before it
contacts the cover material or captured and
handled appropriately after contacting it.
Granular wastes used as daily cover should
be low in fine-grained particles to avoid waste
being transported by wind. Before using alter-
native covers, especially coproducts, you
should consult the state to determine what, if
any, regulations apply.
Daily cover should be applied after the
waste has been placed, spread, and compact-
ed. Cover frequency is most often determined
by the type of industrial waste disposed of at
the landfill or waste pile. Frequent applica-
tion of earthen material might be required if
undesirable conditions persist. A typical daily
soil cover thickness is 6 inches, but different
thicknesses might be sufficient. When using
earthen cover, it is important to avoid soils
with high clay content. Clay, due to its low
permeability, can block vertical movement of
water and channel it horizontally through the
landfill or waste pile.
EPA is investigating the potential of bioreactor landfills as the concept applies to the operation of a
municipal landfill. The idea of a bioreactor landfill might be considered appropriate in select cases for
an industrial landfill at some time in the future.
In Pennsylvania a coproduct is defined as "materials which are essentially equivalent to and used in
place of an intentionally manufactured product or produced raw material and... [which present] no
greater risk to the public or the environment."
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Using alternative daily cover materials can
save valuable space in a waste management
unit. Some types of commercially available
daily cover materials include foam that usual-
ly is sprayed on the working face at the end
of the day and geosynthetic products, such as
a tarp or fabric panel that is applied at the
end of the working day and removed at the
beginning of the following working day.
Some of these materials require specially
designed application equipment, while others
use equipment generally available at most
units. Criteria to consider when selecting an
alternative daily cover material include avail-
ability and suitability of the material, precipi-
tation, chemical compatibility with waste,
equipment requirements, and cost.
E. Placing Wastes
To protect the integrity of liner systems,
the waste management system should pre-
scribe proper waste placement practices. The
primary physical compatibility issue is punc-
ture of the liner by sharp objects in the waste.
Ensure that the liner is protected from items
angular and sharp enough to puncture it.
Similarly, facility employees should be
instructed to keep heavy equipment off the
liner. Another physical compatibility issue is
keeping fine-grained waste materials away
from drainage layers that could be clogged by
such materials.
Differential settlement of wastes is another
problem that can be associated with waste
placement. To avoid differential settlement,
focus on how the waste is placed on the liner
material or on the protective layer above the
liner. Uneven placement of waste, or uneven
compaction can result in differential settle-
ment of succeeding waste layers or of final
cover. Differential settlement, in turn, can lead
to ponding and infiltration of water and dam-
age to liners or leachate collection systems. In
extreme cases, failure of waste slopes can
occur. To avoid these problems, it is impor-
tant to ensure that waste is properly placed
and, if possible, compacted to ensure stability
of the final cover.
To protect liner integrity in lined surface
impoundments, consider placing an erosion
guard or a concrete pad on the liner at the
point where waste discharges into the unit.
Otherwise, pressure from the waste hitting
the liner can accelerate liner deterioration in
that area. Inlet pipes can also be arranged so
that liquid waste being discharged into the
unit is diffused upward or to the side.
Although inlet pipes can enter the surface
impoundment above the water level, the
point of discharge should be submerged to
avoid generating odor and disturbing the cir-
culation of stratified ponds. Discharging liq-
uid waste straight into the unit without
diffusion is not recommended as this can dis-
rupt the intended treatment.
F. Sludge Removal
If significant amounts of sludge accumu-
late on the bottom of an impoundment, it
might be necessary to remove the sludge and
dispose of it periodically. There are two ways
to remove the sludge: dewater the cell and
remove the sludge after it has dried, or
dredge the impoundment. Many different
methods exist for dredging an impoundment.
Examples include a tanker truck outfitted
with a vacuum hose, manned and remote
dredges, and submersible pumps on steel
pontoons used as a floating dredge or
dragged on the pond bottom. You should
work with your state and sludge removal pro-
fessionals to choose or create a method that
works best at your facility.
There are two main concerns regarding
sludge management: protecting the liner
while cleaning out sludge from the impound-
ment (if a liner is used) and properly dispos-
ing of any removed sludge. During dredging,
8-10
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
heavy equipment can damage the liner. You
can avoid this by selecting equipment and
methods that protect the liner during sludge
removal. Further, any sludge removed should
be evaluated and managed in an appropriate
manner, based on its chemical properties.
G. Climate Considerations
Waste management operations can be
affected by weather conditions, especially
rain, snow, or wind. Rainy or snowy weather
can create a variety of problems, such as hin-
dered vehicle access and difficulty in spread-
ing and compacting waste. To combat these
difficulties, consider altering drainage pat-
terns, maintaining storm-water controls,
maintaining all-weather access roads (if
appropriate), or designating a wet-weather
disposal area.
Extremely cold conditions can prevent effi-
cient excavation of soil from a borrow pit and
can also inhibit the spreading and com-
paction of soil cover on the waste. Freezing
temperatures can also inflict excessive wear
on equipment. To combat these problems,
you can use coarse-textured soil during win-
ter operations, stockpile cover soil for winter
use, and protect cover soil with leaves, plas-
tics, or other insulating materials.
Consider using special inclement weather
disposal areas during extreme wet and windy
weather. In wet weather, placing waste in a
part of the unit near the entrance reduces the
likelihood of trucks causing ruts on site road-
ways or being stranded in mud. Under windy
conditions, waste might need to be wetted or
placed in downwind areas of a unit to reduce
blowing waste or particulates.
H. Security Measures,
Access Control, and
Traffic Management
To prevent injury to members of the pub-
lic, consider implementing security and
access control measures to block unautho-
rized entry to a unit. These measures can also
help to prevent scavenging, vandalism, and
illegal dumping of unauthorized wastes.
Providing access controls for the facility with-
in which the unit is located is an example of
providing such measures for the unit.
Examples of access control measures
include fences, locked gates, security guards,
and surveillance systems; and natural barriers
such as, berms, trees, hedges, ditches, and
embankments. The site perimeter should be
clearly marked or fenced. Additionally, consid-
er posting signs that warn of restricted access
and alert the public to the potential for harm
associated with heavy equipment operations.
How can onsite traffic best be
managed?
Even though access to the unit is limited,
it is important to provide clear transportation
routes for emergency response equipment to
access the waste management unit. Traffic
management is often overlooked as part of
waste management unit operations. Proper
traffic routing can help a unit operate more
smoothly and prevent injuries and deter
intruders. Access roads should be designed
and built to be safe and efficient, and blind
spots or unmarked intersections should be
minimized. They should also be located to
provide long-term service without requiring
relocation. Posting clear directional signs can
help direct traffic and reduce the potential for
vehicle accidents. Providing all-weather
access roads (if appropriate) and temporary
storage areas can improve waste transport to
and from a unit and allow equipment to
8-11
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
move about more freely. In addition, you can
consider imposing onsite speed limits or con-
structing speed bumps.
Access roads should be maintained proper-
ly at all times. Adequate drainage of road
beds is essential for proper operation of a
unit. Heavy, loaded vehicles traveling to and
from a unit deteriorate the roads on which
they travel. Equipment without rubber tires
should be restricted from the paved stretches
of roads as they can damage the roads.
Sufficient funds should be allocated up front
for the maintenance of access roads.
What are some other prudent
safety measures?
There are a number of safety considera-
tions associated with ground-water monitor-
ing wells. The tops of monitoring wells
should be clearly marked and accessible. In
traffic areas, posts and bumper guards around
monitoring wells can help protect above-
ground installations from damage. Posts and
bumper guards come in various sizes and
strengths and are typically constructed for
high visibility and trimmed with reflective
tape or highly visible paint containing reflec-
tive material.
Proper labeling of monitoring wells is also
important for several reasons. Monitoring
wells should be distinguished from under-
ground storage tank fill lines, for example.
Also, different monitoring wells should be
distinguished from each other. Monitoring
wells, therefore, should be labeled on immov-
able parts of the well.
I. Providing Employee
Training
One of the most important aspects of a
waste management system is employee train-
ing. Employees should be trained before their
initial assignment, upon changing assign-
ments, and any time a new health or safety
hazard is introduced into the work area. A
good training program uses concrete exam-
ples to improve and maintain employee skill,
safety, and teamwork. Training can be provid-
ed by in-house trainers, trade associations,
computer programs, or specialized consul-
tants. In some states, proactive safety and
training programs are required by law.
^-~-<-_—
Classroom training helps familiarize employees
with operating procedures.
What types of training can be
provided for employees?
Safety is a primary concern because waste
management operations can present a variety
of risks to workers. In addition, employee
right-to-know laws require employers to pro-
vide training and information about safety
issues pertinent to a given occupation.
Furthermore, accidents can be expensive,
with hidden costs often amounting to several
times the apparent costs. Accidents at waste
management units can include injury from
explosions or fire, inhalation of contaminants
and dust, asphyxiation from poorly vented
leachate collection system manholes or tanks,
falls from vehicles, injury associated with
operating heavy earth-moving equipment,
exposure to extreme cold or heat, and onsite
traffic accidents.
To minimize risks to workers, it is rec-
ommended that you provide an ongoing
safety training program to ensure all staff
8-12
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
are properly and regularly trained on safety
issues. A safety training program should be
consistent with the requirements specified
by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and include initial
training and frequent refresher sessions on
at least the following topics:
• Waste management operations.
• Hazardous waste identification.
• Monitoring equipment operations.
• Emergency shut-off procedures.
• Overview of safety health, and other
hazards present at the site.
• Symptoms and signs of overexposure
to hazards.
• Proper lifting methods, material han-
dling procedures, equipment opera-
tion, and safe driving practices.
• Emergency response topics, such as
spill response, fire suppression, haz-
ard analysis, and location and op-
eration of emergency equipment.
• Requirements for personal protective
gear, such as hard hats, gloves, gog-
gles, safety shoes, and high-visibility
vests.
Weave a common thread of teamwork into
every training program. Breaks in communica-
tion between site engineers and field opera-
tions personnel can occur. Bridging this gap is
an important step toward building an effective
unit team that can work together. Consider
periodic special training to update employees
on new equipment and technologies, to
improve and broaden their range of job-related
skills, and to keep them fresh on the basics.
Training can also include such peripheral top-
ics as liability concerns, first aid, avoidance of
substance abuse, and stress management.
Sample Manager and
Supervisor Training Agenda
• Introduction
• Unit basics:
—Siting
—Waste containment
—Daily operations
• Owning and operating costs
• Machine types
• Equipment maintenance
• Maximizing airspace
• Labor management
• Production analysis
• Application of production rate data
• Budgets and data tracking:
—Operating budget
—Cover soil budget
—Airspace budget
• Waste handling techniques
• Waste management techniques
• Cover soil placement
• Safety issues and safety meetings
• Record keeping
• Emergency response plan
• State requirements for operation
Bolton, N. 1995. The Handbook of Landfill
Operations: a Practical Guide for Landfill
Engineers, Owners, and Operators. (ISBN 0-
9646956-0-X). Reprinted by permission.
8-13
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Equipment Operator
Training Agenda
• Introduction
• Unit basics:
—Siting
—Waste containment
—Daily operations
• Heavy equipment types and applications:
—Scraper, dozer, and compactor
operations
—Support equipment
—Fluids
—Fueling, maintenance and its
hazards, and fuel spill prevention
• Cover operations:
—Types of cover soil
—Placement of cover soil
• Drainage control
• Surveying and staking
• Unit safety:
—Emergency response plans
—Safe operating techniques
• Owning and operating costs
Bolton, N. 1995. The Handbook of Landfill
Operations: a Practical Guide for Landfill
Engineers, Owners, and Operators. (ISBN 0-
9646956-0-X). Reprinted by permission.
How should training programs
be conducted?
You should keep records of the type and
amount of training provided to employees,
and obtain documentation (employee signa-
tures) whenever training is given. Consider
establishing regular (at least monthly) safety
meetings, during which specific topics can be
addressed and employees can voice concerns,
ask questions, and present ideas. Keep meet-
ings short and to the point, and steer discus-
sion toward topics that are applicable to
those employees present. In addition, do not
waste time talking about issues not applica-
ble to a site. If a site experiences extreme
weather conditions, develop safety meeting
topics that address weather-related safety.
Many safety-related videos are available and
can add variety to meetings.
Closely monitor worker accident and
injury reports to try to identify conditions
that warrant corrective or preventive mea-
sures. In addition, it is wise to document all
safety meetings. Assistance in establishing a
safety program is available from insurance
companies with worker's compensation pro-
grams, the National Safety Council, safety
consultants, and federal and state government
safety organizations. The overall cost of an
aggressive, preventive safety program is
almost certain to be offset by the savings from
a decrease in lost work time and injuries.
J. Emergency Response
Plan and Procedures
There are three major types of waste man-
agement emergencies: accidents, spills, and
fires/explosions. A waste management system
should include emergency response plans for
each of these scenarios that considers not
only the waste management unit but also all
surrounding facility areas. The plans should
be reviewed and revised periodically to keep
the procedures fresh in employees' minds and
to reflect any changes in such items as the
unit operating procedures, facility operations,
physical and chemical changes in the wastes,
generated volumes, addition or replacement
of emergency equipment, and personnel
changes. If an emergency does arise, or if haz-
8-14
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
ardous waste is inadvertently disposed of in a
unit, notify appropriate agencies, adjacent
land owners, and emergency response person-
nel, if needed. After emergency conditions
have been cleared, review the waste manage-
ment system and revise it, if necessary, to pre-
vent similar mishaps in the future.
A facility might be required to prepare sim-
ilar emergency response or contingency plans
under other regulatory programs [e.g., Spill
Prevention Control and Countermeasures and
Response Plan requirements (40 CFR Part
112.7(d) and 112.20-21); Risk Management
Program regulations (40 CFR Part 68); and
HAZWOPER regulations (29 CFR 1910.120)].
EPA encourages facilities to consolidate emer-
gency response plans whenever possible to
elimante redundancy and confusion. The
National Response Team, chaired by EPA, has
prepared its Integrated Contingency Plan
Guidance (61 FR 28642; June 5, 1996) as a
model for integrating such plans.
How should an appropriate
emergency response plan be
developed?
An emergency response plan should con-
sider the following:
• Description of types of emergencies that
would necessitate a response action.
• Names, roles, and duties of primary
and alternate emergency coordinators.
• Spill notification procedures.
• Who should be notified.
• Fire department or emergency
response telephone number.
• Hospital telephone number.
• Primary and secondary emergency
staging areas.
• Location of first aid supplies.
Designation and training of several
first aid administrators.
Location of and operating procedures
for all fire control, spill control, and
decontamination equipment.
Location of hoses, sprinklers, or
water spray systems and adequate
water supplies.
Description and listing of emergency
response equipment.
Sample Laborer Training
Agenda
• Introduction
• Unit basics:
—Siting
—Waste containment
—Daily operations
• Traffic management and safety
• Interacting with the public
• Load segregation and placement
• Hazardous material identification pro-
cedure
• Unit equipment types and applications
• Cover operations
• Equipment maintenance
• Unit safety:
—Heavy equipment safety
—Traffic safety
—Personal protective equipment
• Emergency response plans
Bolton, N. 1995. The Handbook of Landfill
Operations: a Practical Guide for Landfill
Engineers, Owners, and Operators. (ISBN 0-
9646956-0-X). Reprinted by permission.
8-15
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
• Maintenance and testing log of emer-
gency equipment.
• Plans to familiarize local authorities,
local emergency response organiza-
tions, and neighbors with the charac-
teristics of the unit and appropriate
and inappropriate responses to vari-
ous emergency situations.
• Information on state emergency
response teams, response contractors,
and equipment suppliers.
• Properties of the waste being handled
at the unit, and types of injuries that
could result from fires, explosions,
releases, or other mishaps.
• An evacuation plan for unit person-
nel (if applicable).
• Prominent posting of the above
information.
The emergency plan should instruct all
employees what to do if an emergency arises,
and all employees should be familiar with the
plan and their responsibilities under it. In
order to ensure that everyone knows what to
do in an emergency, EPA recommends con-
ducting periodic drills. These practice re-
sponses could be planned ahead of time or
they could be unannounced. Either way, the
drills are treated as real emergencies and
serve to hone the skills of the employees who
might have to respond to actual emergencies.
The key to responding effectively to an emer-
gency is knowing in advance what to do.
Communication is vital during an emer-
gency and should be an inherent component
of any emergency response plan. Two-way
radios and bullhorns can prove invaluable in
the event of an emergency, and an alarm sys-
tem can let employees know that an emer-
gency situation is at hand. It is recommended
that you designate one or more employees
who will not be essential to the emergency
response to handle public affairs during a
major emergency. These employees should
work with the press to ensure that the public
receives an accurate account of the emergency.
K. Record Keeping
Record keeping is a vital part of cost-effec-
tive, efficient waste management unit opera-
tions. Records should be maintained for an
appropriate period of time, but it is a good
idea to keep a set of core records indefinitely.
Some facilities have instituted policies that
records are to be maintained for up to 30
years while other facilities maintain records
for only 3 years. Some states have record
keeping requirements for certain waste man-
agement units and associated practices. You
should check with state authorities to deter-
mine what, if any, record keeping is required
by law and to determine how long records
should be kept.
Besides being required by some states,
records help evaluate and optimize unit per-
formance. Over time, these records can serve
as a valuable almanac of activities, as well as
a source of cost information to help fine tune
future expenditures and operating budgets.
Data on waste volume, for example, can
allow a prediction of remaining site life, any
special equipment that might be needed, and
personnel requirements. Furthermore, if a
Keeping accurate records is an essential part
of unit operations.
8-16
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
facility is ever involved in litigation, accurate,
dated records can be invaluable in establish-
ing a case.
What type of records should be
kept?
Operational records that should be main-
tained include the following, as appropriate:
• Waste analysis results.
• Liner compatibility testing (where a
liner system is considered appropriate).
• Waste volume.
• Location of waste placement, includ-
ing a map.
• Depth of waste below the final cover
surface.
• Inventory of daily cover material
used and stockpile.
• Frequency of waste application.
• Equipment operation and mainte-
nance statistics.
• Environmental monitoring data and
results.
• Inspection reports, including pho-
tographs.
• Design documents, including draw-
ings and certifications.
• Cost estimates and other financial
data.
• Plans for unit closure and post-clo-
sure care.
• Information on financial assurance
mechanisms.
• Daily log of activities.
• Calendar of events.
Health and safety records that should be
maintained include the following:
L.
Personal information and work history
for each employee, including health
information such as illness reports.
Accident records.
Work environmental records.
Occupational safety records, includ-
ing safety training and safety surveys.
Addressing Nuisance
Concerns
Minimizing nuisances, such as noise, odor,
and disease vectors, is of great importance for
the health of personnel working in the indus-
trial facility and of neighbors that live or work
near a unit. This section describes many of
the nuisance concerns typical of waste man-
agement units and offers measures to address
them. Measures besides those listed can also
be used to achieve the same objective.
How can noises be minimized?
Noise resulting from the operation of
heavy equipment can be a concern for waste
management units located near residential
areas. Noise can also disrupt animal habitats
and behavior. In addition, workers' hearing
and stress levels can be adversely affected by
long-term exposure to noise. At waste man-
agement units where noise is a concern, lim-
iting hours of operation can reduce potential
problems. Design access routes to minimize
the impact of site traffic noise on nearby
neighborhoods. Equipment should also be
maintained to minimize unnecessary noise,
and affected workers should wear ear protec-
tion (plugs or muffs). Berms, wind breaks, or
other barriers can be erected to help mute
sounds. OSHA has established standards for
occupational exposure to noise (see 29 CFR
§1910.95).
8-17
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
How can odor be minimized?
Increased urbanization has led to industri-
al facilities being situated in close proximity
to residential areas and commercial develop-
ments. This has resulted in numerous com-
plaints about odors from industrial waste
management units and industrial processes
such as poultry processing, slaughtering and
rendering, tanning, and manufacture of
volatile organics. Some of the major sources
of odors are hydrogen sulfide and organic
compounds generated by anaerobic decom-
position. The latter can include mercaptans,
indole, skatole, amines, and fatty acids. Odor
might be a concern at a unit, depending on
proximity to neighbors and the nature of the
wastes being managed. In addition to causing
complaints, odors can be a sign of toxic or
irritating gases or anaerobic conditions in a
unit that could have adverse health effects or
environmental impacts. Plan to be proactive
in minimizing odors, and establish proce-
dures to respond to citizen complaints about
odor problems and to correct the problems.
Odors can be seasonal in nature and,
therefore, can often be anticipated. Some
odors at landfills, waste piles, and land appli-
cation units arise either from waste being
unloaded or from improperly covered in-
place waste. If odor from waste being
unloaded becomes a problem, it might be
necessary to place these loads in a portion of
the unit where they can be immediately cov-
ered with soil. At land application units,
quick incorporation or injection of waste can
help prevent odor. It also might be prudent to
establish a system whereby unit personnel are
notified when odorous wastes are coming to
the unit to allow them to prepare accordingly.
Odors from in-place waste can effectively be
minimized by maintaining the integrity of
cover material over everything but the cur-
rently active face. Proper waste compaction
also helps to control odors. Consider imple-
menting gas controls if odors are associated
with gases generated from a unit.
If odors emanate from surface impound-
ments, there are several options available for
control, including biological and chemical
treatment. The type of treatment for an
impoundment should be determined on a
site-specific basis, taking into account the
chemistry of the waste.
Practices to control odor are especially
important at land application units. If land
application is used, it is important to apply
waste at appropriate rates for site conditions,
and design and locate waste storage facilities
to minimize odor problems. Make it a priority
to minimize potential odors by applying
wastes as soon as possible after delivery and
incorporating wastes into the soil as soon as
possible after application. Cleaning trucks,
tanks, and other equipment daily (or more fre-
quently, if necessary) can also help reduce
odor. Avoid applying waste when soils are wet
or frozen or when other soil or slope condi-
tions would cause ponding or poor drainage.
Chapter 7 Section C- Designing a Land
Application Program presents information
concerning an odor management plan for land
application facilities.
Other methods of controlling odors
include:
• Covering or enclosing the unit.
• Adding chemicals such as chlorine,
lime, and ferric chloride to reduce
bacterial activity and oxidize many
products of anaerobic decomposition.
• Using biofilters.
• Applying a deep soil cover, whose
upper layers consist of silty soils or
soils containing a large percentage of
carbon or humic material.
• Applying a layer of relatively imper-
meable soil, so as to reduce gas gen-
8-18
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
eration rates by reducing the amount
of rainfall water percolating into the
waste.
• Restoring landfill surface covers when
subsidence and cracks occur.
Choosing a method for controlling odors
involves a comprehensive understanding of
wastes and how they react under certain cir-
cumstances. Consult with state agencies to
determine the most effective odor control
method for the wastes in question.
In addition to these steps to control odor
generation, consider steps to manage those
odors that are generated. When designing a
waste management unit, consider installing
barriers such as walls, berms, embankments,
and dense plantings of trees set at right
angles to the flow of cold, odorous night-
time air. These measures can help to impede
the odor and dilute it through mixture with
higher layers of fresh air. Alternatively, con-
sider placing an impermeable fence or wall
on top of a berm or embankment, on its
downwind side. This will increase odor
plume height, and odors will be diluted on
the steep downslope side of the barrier as a
result of turbulent mixing of air layers as the
cold air flows over it. Try to locate such barri-
ers as close to the unit as possible.
Another design suggestion is to plant fast-
growing evergreen trees which have good
windbreak properties in buffer-zones around a
unit. In addition to dispersing odors, dense
plantings of evergreen trees will also help to
protect the unit itself from strong winds, reduc-
ing the possibility of windblown soil erosion.
How can disease vectors be
controlled?
Disease vectors are animals or insects, such
as rodents, birds, flies, and mosquitos, that
can transmit disease to humans. Burrowing
animals, such as gophers, moles, and ground-
hogs, can also damage vital unit structures,
such as liners, final cover materials, drainage
ditches, and sedimentation ponds. As a result,
these animals can create costly problems.
Consider the following methods to control
disease vectors:
• Apply adequate daily cover. This sim-
ple action is often all that is needed
to control many disease vectors.
• Make sure the unit is properly
drained, reducing the amount of
standing water that acts as a breeding
medium for insects.
• As a last resort, or when the applica-
tion of cover material is impractical,
consider using repellents, insecticides,
rodenticides, or pest reproductive con-
trol. Care must be taken to make sure
that pesticides are used only in accor-
dance with specified uses and applica-
tion methods. Follow the instructions
carefully when using these products.
Trapping animals might also be con-
sidered, but trapping alone rarely
eliminates the problem.
If land applying wastes, subsurface injection
and prompt incorporation of waste can help
control vectors. Both of these methods work
by using the soil as a barrier between the
waste and the vectors. If a waste storage facili-
ty exists, these can attract vectors as well and
should not be overlooked in the implementa-
tion of vector control. If vector problems arise
8-19
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Operating the Waste Management
System Activity List
Q Develop a waste management system identifying the standard procedures necessary
for a unit to operate according to its design throughout the intended working life.
Q Provide proper maintenance and operation of ground-water, surface-water, and air
controls.
Q Develop daily procedures to place waste, operate environmental controls, and inspect
and maintain the unit.
Q Review at a regular interval, such as annually, whether the waste management system
needs to be updated.
Q Develop a waste analysis procedure to ensure an understanding of the physical and
chemical composition of the waste to be managed.
Q Develop regular schedules for waste screening and for unit inspections.
Q If daily cover is recommended, select an appropriate daily cover and establish
processes for placing and covering waste.
Q Consider how operations can be affected by climate conditions.
Q Implement security measures to prevent unauthorized entry.
Q Provide personnel with proper training.
Q Establish emergency response procedures and familiarize employees with emergency
equipment.
Q Develop procedures for maintaining records.
Q Establish nuisance controls to minimize dust, noise, odor, and disease vectors.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Operating the Waste Management System
Resources
ASTM. 1993. Standard Practice for Maintaining Health and Safety Records at Solid Waste Processing Facilities.
E 1076-85.
Bagchi, A. 1994. Design, Construction, and Monitoring ol Landfills. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bolton, N. 1995. The Handbook ol Landfill Operations: A Practical Guide for Landfill Engineers, Owners, and
Operators. Blue Ridge Solid Waste Consulting.
Robinson, W 1986. The Solid Waste Handbook: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
U.S. EPA. 1997. ISO 14000 Resource Directory. EPA625-R-97-003.
U.S. EPA/National Response Team. 1996. The National Response Teams Integrated Contingency Plan
Guidance; Notice. (61 FR 28642; June 5, 1996).
U.S. EPA. 1998. CAMEO: Computer-Aided Management ol Emergency Operations. EPA550-F-98-003.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Decision-Maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management, Second Edition. EPA530-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1995. State Requirements for Industrial Nonhazardous Waste Management Facilities.
U.S. EPA. 1994. Seminar Publication: Design, Operation, and Closure ol Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
EPA625-R-94-008.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual. EPA530-R-93-017.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Technical Resource Document: Design, Construction, and Operation ol Hazardous and
Nonhazardous Waste Surface Impoundments. EPA530-SW-91-054.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846.
U.S. EPA. 1988. RCRA Inspection Manual. OSWER Directive 9938.2A.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Subtitle D olRCRA, "Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills" (40 CFR Part 258),
Operating Criteria (Subpart C). Draft/Background Document.
-------
-------
Part V
Ensuring Long-Term Protection
Chapter 9
Monitoring Performance
-------
-------
Contents
I. Ground-Water Monitoring 9 - 2
A. Hydrogeological Characterization 9 - 2
B. Monitoring Methods 9-4
1. Conventional Monitoring Wells 9-4
2. Direct-Push Ground-Water Sampling 9 - 4
3. Geophysical Methods 9 - 5
C. Number of Wells 9 -6
D. Lateral and Vertical Placement of Wells 9 - 7
1. Lateral Placement 9 - 7
2. Vertical Placement and Screen Lengths 9 - 8
E. Monitoring Well Design, Installation, and Development 9 - 9
1. Well Design 9 -9
2. Well Installation 9 - 12
3. Well Development 9 - 12
F. Duration and Frequency of Monitoring 9 - 13
G. Sampling Parameters 9 - 13
H. Potential Modifications to a Basic Ground-Water Monitoring Program 9 - 14
1. Duration and Frequency of Monitoring 9 - 14
2. Sampling Parameters 9-16
3. Vadose-Zone Monitoring 9 - 16
II. Surface-Water Monitoring 9 - 21
A. Monitoring Storm-Water Discharges 9 - 22
B. Monitoring Discharges to POTWs 9 - 25
C. Monitoring Surface Water Conditions 9 - 26
III. Soil Monitoring 9-28
A. Determining the Quality of Soil 9-29
B. Sampling Location and Frequency 9 - 30
C. Sampling Equipment 9-31
D. Sample Collection 9 - 31
IV Air Monitoring 9 - 32
A. Types of Air Emissions Monitoring 9 - 33
1. Emissions Monitoring 9 - 33
2. Ambient Monitoring 9 - 33
3. Fugitive Monitoring 9 - 34
4. Meteorological Monitoring 9 - 34
-------
Contents
B. Air Monitoring and Sampling Equipment 9 - 36
1. Ambient Air Monitoring 9-36
2. Source Emissions Monitoring 9 - 37
C.Test Method Selection 9 - 38
D. Sampling Site Selection 9 - 38
V Sampling and Analytical Protocols and Quality Assurance and Quality Control 9-39
A. Data Quality Objectives 9 - 41
B. Sample Collection 9 - 41
C. Sample Preservation and Handling 9 - 42
D. Quality Assurance and Quality Control 9-42
E. Analytical Protocols 9 - 44
VI. Analysis of Monitoring Data, Contingency Planning, and Assessment Monitoring 9 - 45
A. Statistical Approaches 9 - 45
B. Contingency Planning 9 - 46
C. Assessment Monitoring 9 - 46
Monitoring Performance Activity List 9 - 48
Resources 9-50
Tables:
Table 1: Factors Affecting Number of Wells Per Location 9 - 9
Table 2: Potential Parameters for Basic Groundwater Monitoring 9 - 15
Table 3: Recommended Components of a Basic Ground-Water Monitoring Program 9 - 16
Table 4: Comparison of Manual and Automatic Sampling Techniques 9 - 24
Table 5: Types of QA/QC Samples 9 - 43
Figures:
Figure 1: Cross-Section of a Generic Monitoring Well 9 - 5
Figure 2: Major Methods for In Situ Monitoring of Soil Moisture or Matrix Potential 9 - 18
Figure 3: Example Methods for Collecting Soil-Pore Samples 9 - 19
Figure 4: Soil Gas Sampling Systems 9 - 20
Figure 5: Schematic Diagram of various Types of Sampling Systems 9 - 36
Figure 6: Sampling Train 9 - 38
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Monitoring Performance
This chapter will help you:
• Carefully design and implement a monitoring program that is essen-
tial to evaluating whether a unit meets performance objectives and
whether there are releases to, and impacts on, the surrounding
environment that need to be corrected.
• Design effective monitoring programs that protect the environment,
improve unit performance, and help reduce long-term costs and lia-
bilities associated with industrial waste management.
Monitoring the performance of
a waste management unit is
an integral part of a compre-
hensive waste management
system. A properly imple-
mented monitoring program provides an
indication of whether a waste management
unit is functioning in accordance with its
design, and detects any changes in the quality
This chapter will address the following
questions.
• What site characterizations are needed to
develop an effective monitoring program?
• What are the basic elements of a moni-
toring program?
• How should sampling and analytical pro-
tocols be used in a monitoring program?
• What procedures should be used to
evaluate monitoring data?
• What elements of the basic monitoring
program can be modified to address
site conditions?
of the environment caused by the unit. The
detection information obtained from a moni-
toring program can be used to ensure that the
proper types of wastes are being managed in
the unit, discover and repair any damaged
area(s) of the unit, and determine if an alter-
native management approach might be
appropriate. By implementing a monitoring
program, facility managers can identify prob-
lems or releases in a timely fashion and take
the appropriate measures to limit contamina-
tion. Continued detection of contamination
in the environment could result in the imple-
mentation of more aggressive corrective
action measures to remediate releases.
This chapter highlights issues associated
with establishing a ground-water monitoring
program because most industrial waste man-
agement units need to have such a program.
The chapter also provides a discussion of air,
surface water, and soil monitoring that might
be applicable to some units managing industri-
al waste. You should consult with qualified
professionals, such as engineers and ground-
water specialists,1 for technical assistance in
making decisions about the design and opera-
tion of a ground-water monitoring program. In
For the purpose of this chapter, a qualified "ground-water specialist" refers to a scientist or engineer
who has received a baccalaureate or post-graduate degree in the natural sciences or engineering and has
sufficient training and experience in ground-water hydrology and related fields as demonstrated by
state registration, professional certifications, or completion of accredited university programs that
enable that individual to make sound professional judgements regarding ground-water monitoring,
contaminant fate and transport, and corrective action.
9-1
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
addition when questions arise concerning soil,
air, or surface-water monitoring, you should
also consult specialists in these areas as each
media requires different expertise.
I. Ground-Water
Monitoring
The basic elements of a ground-water
monitoring program include:
• The monitoring method.
• The number of wells.
• Location and screened intervals of
wells.
• Well design, installation, and devel-
opment.
• The duration and frequency of moni-
toring.
• Sampling parameters to be monitored.
The remainder of this section provides a
brief overview of the six basic elements of a
ground-water monitoring program, along
with a discussion of the importance of a
hydrogeological characterization.
A. Hydrogeological
Characterization
An accurate hydrogeological characteriza-
tion is the foundation of an effective ground-
water monitoring system. The goal of a
hydrogeological characterization is to acquire
site-specific data to enable the development
of an appropriate ground-water monitoring
program for a site. In some instances, a com-
plete hydrogeological characterization might
not be necessary due to the type of unit
being considered, the type of waste being
managed, or the climate. The design of the
ground-water monitoring program should be
based upon the following site-specific data:
Why is it important to use
a qualified professional?
• Site characterizations can be extremely
complex.
• Incorrect or incomplete characteriza-
tions could result in inaccurate detec-
tion of contamination in the ground
water due to improper placement of
ground-water monitoring wells and can
cost a significant amount of money.
Incorrect or incomplete characteriza-
tions could also result in the installation
of unnecessary monitoring wells at sig-
nificant cost.
• You should always use a qualified pro-
fessional to conduct site characteriza-
tions. Check to see if the professional
has sufficient training and experience in
ground-water hydrology and related
fields, as demonstrated by state registra-
tion, professional certification, or com-
pletion of accredited university
programs. These professionals should
be experienced at analyzing ground-
water flow and contaminant fate and
transport and at designing ground-
water monitoring systems. Ensure that
these professionals are familiar with the
contaminants in the waste and thor-
oughly check their references.
The lateral and vertical extent of the
uppermost aquifer.
The lateral and vertical extent of the
upper and lower confining units/layers.
The geology at the waste manage-
ment unit's site, such as stratigraphy,
lithology and structural setting.
The chemical properties of the upper-
most aquifer and its confining layers
9-2
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
relative to local ground-water chem-
istry and wastes managed at the unit.
• Ground-water flow, including:
- The vertical and horizontal direc-
tions of ground-water flow in the
uppermost aquifer.
- The vertical and horizontal compo-
nents of the hydraulic gradient in
the uppermost aquifer and any
hydraulically connected aquifer.
- The hydraulic conductivities of the
materials that comprise the uppermost
aquifer and its confining units/layers.
- The average linear horizontal veloci-
ty of ground-water flow in the
uppermost aquifer.
To perform a hydrogeological characteriza-
tion and develop an understanding of a site's
hydrogeology a variety of sources and kinds
of information should be considered.
• Existing information. This can
include the history of the site, includ-
ing documented records describing
wastes managed on site and releases.
This information can help you char-
acterize the area of the waste manage-
ment unit and better understand
background conditions. Some hydro-
geological information might also
have been developed in the past, for
example during the siting process
(see Chapter 4-Considering the Site).
It might be useful to conduct litera-
ture reviews for research performed
in the area of the unit and examine
federal and state geological and envi-
ronmental reports related to the site
or to the region where the site is to
be located. This review can often
assist in better understanding the
overall site geology and ground-water
flow beneath the unit.
Site geology. A geologic unit is typi-
cally considered to be any distinct or
definable native rock or soil stratum.
Characterize thickness, stratigraphy,
lithology and hydraulic characteris-
tics of saturated and unsaturated geo-
logic units and fill materials overlying
the uppermost aquifer, in the upper-
most aquifer, and in the lower con-
fining unit of the uppermost aquifer
using soil borings, drilling, or geo-
physical methods. Conventional soil
borings are typically used to charac-
terize onsite soils through direct sam-
pling. Geophysical equipment, such
as ground-penetrating radar, electro-
magnetic detection equipment, and
electrical resistivity arrays, can pro-
vide non-invasive measurements of
physical, electrical, or geochemical
properties of the site. Understanding
the different strata can help identify
the appropriate ground-water moni-
toring well locations and screen
depths.
Ground-water flow beneath the
site. Across the United States,
ground-water flow velocities range
from several feet to over 2,000 feet
per year. To determine hydraulic gra-
dient and flow rate, you should
implement a water-level monitoring
program and estimate hydraulic con-
ductivity. This program should
include measurements of seasonal
and temporal fluctuations in flow, the
effect of site construction and opera-
tions on ground-water flow direction,
and variations in ground-water eleva-
tion. Information on water-level
monitoring programs and procedures
for obtaining accurate water level
measurements can be found in EPAs
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Technical
Guidance Document (U.S. EPA, 1988).
9-3
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
The level of effort one employs to character-
ize a site sufficiently to design an adequate
ground-water monitoring system depends on
the geologic and hydrogeologic complexity of
the site. The complexity of a site should not be
assumed; a soil boring program can help
determine the complexity of a site's hydrogeol-
ogy. The American Society for Testing and
Materials' (ASTM) Annual Book ofASTM
Standards2 provides more than 80 guides and
practices related to waste and site characteriza-
tion and sampling. For additional information
on ground-water monitoring, see EPA's
Ground-Water Monitoring: Draft Technical
Guidance (U.S. EPA, 1993a) and Solid Waste
Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual (U.S.
EPA, 1993b).
B. Monitoring Methods
Ground-water monitoring usually involves
the installation of permanent monitoring wells
for periodic collection of ground-water sam-
ples. Waste constituent migration can be mon-
itored by sampling ground water for either
contaminants or geophysical parameters.
Ground water also can be sampled through
semi-permanent conventional monitoring
wells or by temporary direct-push sampling.
Conventional monitoring wells, direct-push
sampling, and geophysical methods are
described below.
1. Conventional Monitoring Wells
The conventional monitoring well is the
most common type used to target a single
screened interval. Figure 1 presents an illustra-
tion of a single screened interval. Specific con-
struction features are described in more detail
below. The conventional monitoring well is
semi-permanent, meaning it can be used for
sampling over an extended period of time and
should be located by professionally surveyed
reference points. To monitor more than one
depth at a single location, you should install
conventional monitoring wells in clusters or
with multilevel sampling devices.
2. Direct-Push Ground-Water
Sampling
Using the direct-push technique, ground
water is sampled by hydraulically pressing
and/or vibrating a probe to the desired depth
and retrieving a ground-water sample through
the probe. The probe is removed for reuse
elsewhere after the desired volume of ground
water is extracted. It is important to clean the
probe with an appropriate decontamination
protocol after each use to avoid potential
cross-contamination.
What are the benefits of direct-
push sampling?
Given favorable geology, the direct-push
method of ground-water sampling can be a
simpler and less expensive alternative to con-
ventional wells. Conventional monitoring
wells, because they are semi-permanent, gen-
erally cost more and take longer to install.
Direct-push technology, however, does not
provide a semi-permanent structure from
which to sample the ground water over an
extended period of time, as do conventional
wells. Also, some states only allow the use of
direct-push technology as an initial screening
technique or as a complement to conventional
monitoring wells.
In sandy aquifers, however, the direct-push
technology can be used to install a well similar
to a conventional monitoring well. Relatively
recent advances in direct-push technology use
pre-packed screens with grouts and seals
attached to a metal pipe that are driven into
the ground, forming an assembly similar to a
conventional well. The appropriate state
agency will be able to tell you whether direct-
push well installations are acceptable.
1 ASTM's Annual Book of ASTM Standards is available in hard copy or on CD-ROM through ASTM's online
bookstore at .
9-4
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Figure 1. Cross-Section of a Generic Monitoring Well
GAS VENT TUBE
PEA GRAVEL FOR EASY RETRIEVAL OF TOOLS AND TO
PREVENT SMALL ANIMAL/INSECT ENTRANCE
THROUGH DRAIN
FORMED PADS
PROTECTIVE CASING FILLED WITH
CEMENT ABOVE LEVEL OF PAD
VENTED WELL CAP
E JL J
STEEL PROTECTIVE CASING
1'-2'VERY FINE SAND
CENTRALIZER
CENTRALIZER •
SURVEYOR'S PIN
FORMED CONCRETE WELL APRON
CONTINUOUS POUR CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
AND WELL APRON
NEAT CEMENT
WELL DIAMETER = 4"
- BOREHOLE DIAMETER = 101 TO 12"
BENTONITE CLAY SLURRY - 2'
- FILTER PACK (21 ABOVE SCREEN)
- SCREENED INTERVAL
• CENTRALIZER
SUMP/SEDIMENT TRAP
BOTTOM CAP
Source: U.S. EPA, 1993a
3. Geophysical Methods
Geophysical methods measure potential
changes in ground-water quality by measur-
ing changes in the geophysical characteristics
of the sub-surface soils, and in some cases, in
the ground water itself. For example, increas-
es in the levels of certain soluble metals in
ground water can change the resistive proper-
ties of the ground water, which can be mea-
sured using surface resistive technologies.
Similarly, changes in the resistive properties
of the vadose zone might indicate the migra-
tion of leachate toward ground water.
9-5
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Geophysical characteristics, such as DC-resis-
tivity, electromagnetic induction, pH, and
temperature, can provide important prelimi-
nary indications of the performance of the
liner system design. You should consult with
the appropriate state agency regarding the
use of a geophysical method. (See Subsurface
Characterization and Monitoring Techniques
(U.S. EPA, 1993) for additional information
on the use of geophysical methods).
How useful is geophysical
method data?
Geophysical methods are more commonly
used to map the initial extent of contamination
at waste management units than for ongoing
monitoring. Initial monitoring data can guide
the placement of permanent monitoring wells
for ongoing monitoring. As discussed later,
geophysical methods, used in conjunction with
ground-water monitoring, can reduce the fre-
quency of well sampling, which could reduce
monitoring costs. The usefulness of geophysi-
cal methods, however, will depend on the local
hydrogeology the contaminant concentration
levels, and type of contaminants.
C. Number of Wells
It is recommended that a ground-water
monitoring system have a minimum of one
upgradient (or background) monitoring well,
and three downgradient monitoring wells to
make statistically meaningful comparisons of
ground-water quality. The upgradient or
background well(s) permit the assessment of
the background quality of onsite ground
water. The downgradient wells permit detec-
tion of any contaminant plumes from a waste
management unit. The actual number of
upgradient and downgradient wells will vary
from unit to unit depending on the actual
site-specific conditions. The actual number of
upgradient and downgradient monitoring
wells and their distribution will influence the
selection of appropriate statistical method. If
an insufficient number of background wells
are used, the use of an inter-well evaluation
might not be possible. Site-specific condi-
tions that influence the number of upgradient
and downgradient wells include:
• Geology of the waste management
unit site.
• Ground-water flow direction and
velocity, including seasonal and tem-
poral fluctuations.
• Permeability or hydraulic conductivi-
ty of any water-bearing formations.
• Physical and chemical characteristics
of contaminants.
• Area of waste management unit.
The number of wells is dependent on the
lateral and vertical placement of monitoring
wells, which is determined by the geology
and hydrogeology of the site. Other factors
influencing the number of wells include the
number of potential contaminant migration
pathways; the spatial distribution of potential
contaminant migration pathways; and the
depth and thickness of stratigraphic horizons
that can serve as contaminant migration
pathways. The number of wells needed will
also vary according to the need for samples
from different depths in the aquifer. This is a
function of hydrogeologic factors and the
chemical and physical characteristics of cont-
aminants. The next section provides a
detailed discussion of the lateral and vertical
placement of monitoring wells.
A larger number of monitoring wells might
be needed at sites with complex hydrogeology.
If a site has multiple waste management units,
use of a multi-unit ground-water monitoring
system can reduce the necessary number of
wells. You should consult with the appropriate
state agency when determining a site's ground-
water monitoring well requirements.
9-6
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
D. Lateral and Vertical
Placement of Wells
The lateral and vertical placement of moni-
toring wells is very site-specific. (Monitoring
wells should yield ground-water samples
from the targeted aquifer(s) that are represen-
tative of both the quality of background
ground water and the quality of ground water
at a downgradient monitoring point.) Locate
monitoring wells at the closest practicable
distance from the waste management unit
boundary to detect contaminants before they
migrate away from the unit. Early detection
provides a warning of potential waste man-
agement unit design failure and allows time
to implement appropriate abatement mea-
sures and potentially eliminate the need for
more extensive corrective action. It also
reduces the area exposed and can limit over-
all liability.
1.
Lateral Placement
Monitoring wells should be placed laterally
along the down-gradient edge of the waste
management unit to intercept potential conta-
minant migration pathways. Ground-water
flow direction and hydraulic gradient are two
major determining factors in monitoring well
placement. Placement of monitoring wells
should also take into account the number
and spatial distribution of potential contami-
nant migration pathways and the depths and
thickness of stratigraphic horizons that can
serve as contaminant migration pathways. In
homogeneous, isotropic hydrogeologic sites,
ground-water flow direction and hydraulic
gradient, along with the potential contami-
nant's chemical and physical characteristics,
will primarily determine lateral well place-
ment. In a more complex site where hydroge-
ology and geology are variable and
preferential pathways exist, (a heterogeneous,
anisotropic hydrogeologic site, for example)
the well placement determination becomes
more complex. Potential migration pathways
are influenced by site geology including
changes in hydraulic conductivity, fractured
or faulted zones, and soil chemistry. Human-
made features that influence ground-water
flow should also be considered. These fea-
tures include ditches, filled areas, buried pip-
ing, buildings, leachate collection systems,
and other adjacent disposal units.
Another point of consideration is seasonal
change in ground-water flow. Seasonal
changes in ground-water flow can result from
seasonal changes in precipitation patterns,
tidal influences, lake or river stage fluctua-
tions, well pumping, or land use pattern
changes. At some sites it might even be possi-
ble that ground water flows in all directions
from a waste management unit. These contin-
gencies might call for placement of monitor-
ing wells in a circular pattern to monitor on
all sides of the waste management unit.
Seasonal fluctuations might cause certain
wells to be downgradient only part of the
time, but such configurations ensure that
releases will be detected.
Lateral placement of monitoring wells also
depends upon the chemical and physical
characteristics of a waste management unit's
constituents. Consider potential contaminant
characteristics such as solubility, Henry's law
constant, partition coefficients, specific gravity
(density), potential for natural attenuation and
the resulting reaction or degradation products,
and the potential for contaminants to degrade
confining layers. A dense non-aqueous phase
liquid (DNAPL), for instance, because of its
density might not necessarily migrate only in
the direction of the ground-water flow. The
presence of DNAPLs, therefore, can result in
placing wells in more locations than just the
normal downgradient sites.
9-7
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
2. Vertical Placement and Screen
Lengths
Similar to lateral placement, vertical well
placement in the ground water around a
waste management unit is determined by
geologic and hydrogeologic factors, as well as
the chemical and physical characteristics of
the potential contaminants. The vertical
placement of each well and its screen lengths
will be determined by the number and spatial
distribution of potential contaminant migra-
tion pathways and the depth and thickness of
potential migration pathways. Site-specific
geology, hydrogeology and constituent char-
acteristics influence the location, size, and
geometry of potential contaminant plumes,
which in turn determine monitoring well
depths and screen lengths.
The chemical and physical characteristics
of potential contaminants from a waste man-
agement unit play a significant role in deter-
mining vertical placement. The specific
properties of a particular contaminant will
determine what potential migration pathway
it might take in an aquifer. The specific char-
acteristics of a contaminant, such as its solu-
bility, Henry's law constant, partition
coefficients, specific gravity (density), poten-
tial for natural attenuation and the resulting
reaction or degradation products, and the
potential for contaminants to degrade confin-
ing layers, will all influence the vertical place-
ment and screen lengths of a unit's
monitoring wells. A DNAPL, for instance, will
sink to the bottom of an aquifer and migrate
along geologic gradients (rather than hydro-
geologic gradients), thus a monitoring well's
vertical placement should correspond with
the depth of the appropriate geologic feature.
LNAPLs (light non-aqueous phase liquids),
on the other hand, would move along the top
of an aquifer, and result in placement of wells
and wells screens at the surface of the aquifer.
Well screen lengths are also determined by
site- and constituent-specific parameters.
These parameters and the importance of tak-
ing vertically discrete ground-water samples,
factor into the determination of well screen
size. Highly heterogeneous (complex) geolog-
ic sites require shorter well screen lengths to
allow for the sampling of discrete migration
pathway. Screens that span more than a single
contaminant migration pathway can cause
cross contamination, possibly increasing the
extent of contamination. Shorter screen
lengths allow for more precise monitoring of
the aquifer or the portion of the aquifer of
concern. Excessively large well screens can
lead to the dilution of samples making conta-
minant detection more difficult.
The depth or thickness of an aquifer also
influences the length of the well screen. Sites
with highly complex geology or relatively
thick aquifers might require multiple screens
at varying depths. Conversely, a relatively
thin and homogenous aquifer might allow for
fewer wells with longer screen lengths. Table
1 below summarizes the recommended fac-
tors to consider when determining the num-
ber of wells needed per sampling location.
You should consult with state officials on
the lateral and vertical placement of monitor-
ing wells including well screening lengths. In
the absence of specific state requirements, it
is recommended that the monitoring points
be no more than 150 meters downgradient
from a waste management unit boundary, on
facility property, and placed in potential cont-
amination migration pathways. This maxi-
mum distance is consistent with the approach
taken in many states in order to protect
waters of the state.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 1
Factors Affecting Number of Wells Per Location (CLUSTER)
One Well per Sampling Location
More Than One Well Per Sampling Location
No light non-aqueous phase liquids
(LNAPLs) or dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) (immiscible liquid
phases)
Presence of LNAPLs or DNAPLs
Thin flow zone (relative to screen
length)
Horizontal flow predominates
Thick flow zones
Vertical gradients present
Homogeneous isotropic uppermost
aquifier, simple geology
Heterogeneous anisotropic uppermost aquifier,
complicated geology
- multiple, interconnected aquifiers
- variable lithology
- perched water zones
- discontinuous structures
Discrete fracture zones in bedrock
Solution conduits, such as caves, in karst terrains
Cavernous basalts
E. Monitoring Well Design,
Installation, and
Development
Ground-water monitoring wells are tai-
lored to suit the hydrogeologic setting, the
type of constituents to be monitored, the
overall purpose of the monitoring program,
and other site-specific variables. You should
consult with the appropriate state agency and
qualified professionals to discuss the design
specifications for ground-water monitoring
wells before beginning construction. Figure f
illustrates the design components that are dis-
cussed in this section. The Annual Book of
ASTM Standards includes guides and practices
related to monitoring well design, construc-
tion, development, maintenance, and decom-
missioning. EPA's Handbook of Suggested
Practices for the Design and Installation of
Ground-Water Monitoring Wells (U.S. EPA,
f 989) also contains this information.
1. Well Design
The typical
components of a
monitoring well
include a well
casing, a well
intake, a filter
pack, an annular
and surface seal,
and surface com-
pletion. Each of
these compo-
nents is briefly
described below.
9-9
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Well Casing
The well casing is a pipe which is installed
temporarily or permanently to counteract
caving and to isolate the zone being moni-
tored. The well casing provides access from
the surface of the ground to some point in
the subsurface. The casing, associated seals,
and grout prevent borehole collapse and
interzonal hydraulic communication. Access
to the monitored zone is through the casing
and either the screened intake or the open
borehole. (Note: some states do not allow the
use of open borehole monitoring wells.
Check with the state agency to determine
whether this type of monitoring well design
is acceptable.) The casing thus permits piezo-
metric head measurements and ground-water
quality sampling.
A well casing can be made of an appropri-
ate rigid tubular material. The most frequently
evaluated characteristics that directly influence
the performance of casing material in ground-
water monitoring applications are strength,
chemical resistance, and interference. The
monitoring well casing should be strong
enough to resist the forces exerted on it by the
surrounding geologic materials and the forces
imposed on it during installation. Casings
should exhibit structural integrity for the
expected duration of the monitoring program
under natural and man-induced subsurface
conditions. Well casing materials should also
be durable enough to withstand galvanic or
electrochemical corrosion and chemical degra-
dation. Metallic casing materials are most sub-
ject to corrosion and thermoplastic casing
materials are most subject to chemical degra-
dation. In addition, casing materials should
not exhibit a tendency to either sorb chemical
constituents from (i.e., take constituents out
of solution by either adsorption or absorption)
or leach chemical constituents into the water
that is sampled from the well. If casing mate-
rials sorb selected constituents, the water-
quality sample will not be representative.
The three most common types of casing
materials are fluoropolymer materials, includ-
ing polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and tetra-
fluoroethylene (TFE); metallic materials,
including carbon steel, galvanized steel, and
stainless steel; and thermoplastic materials,
including polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and acry-
lonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Threaded,
flush casing joints that do not require glue
should be used. Another option is the use of
PTFE tape or o-rings at the threaded joints.
Well Screen
A well screen is a filtering device used to
retain the primary or natural filter pack; it is
usually a cylindrical pipe with openings of a
uniform width, orientation, and spacing. It is
often important to design the monitoring well
with a well intake (well screen) placed oppo-
site the zone to be monitored. The intake
should be surrounded by materials that are
coarser, have a uniform grain size, and have a
higher permeability than natural formation
material. This allows ground water to flow
freely into the well from the adjacent forma-
tion material while minimizing or eliminating
the entrance of fine-grained materials, such as
clay or sand, into the well.
A well screen design should consider:
intake opening (slot) size, intake length,
intake type, and corrosion and chemical-
degradation resistance. Proper sizing of moni-
toring well intake openings is one of the most
important aspects of monitoring well design.
The selection of the length of a monitoring
well intake depends on the purpose of the
well. Most monitoring wells function as both
ground-water sampling points and piezome-
ters3 for a discrete interval. To accomplish
these objectives, well intakes are typically 2
to 10 feet in length and only rarely equal or
exceed 20 feet in length. The hydraulic effi-
ciency of a well intake depends primarily on
the amount of open area available per unit
length of intake. The amount of open area in
3 A piezometer is a non-pumping well, generally of small diameter, used to measure the elevation of the
water table.
9-10
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
a well intake is controlled by the type of well
intake it is and its opening size. Many types
of well intakes have been used in monitoring
wells, including: the louvered (shutter-type)
intake, the bridge-slot intake, the machine-
slotted well casing, and the continuous-slot
wire-wound intake.
Filter Pack
Filter pack is the material placed between
the well screen and the borehole wall that
allows ground water to flow freely into the
well while filtering out fine-grained materials.
It is important to minimize the distortion of
the natural stratigraphic setting during con-
struction of a monitoring well. Hence, it
might be necessary to filter-pack boreholes
that are over-sized with regard to the casing
and well intake diameter. The filter pack pre-
vents formation material from entering the
well intake and helps stabilize the adjacent
formation. The filter-pack materials should be
chemically inert to avoid the potential for
alteration of ground-water sample quality.
Commonly used filter-pack materials include
clean quartz sand, gravel, and glass beads.
You should check with the state regulatory
agency to determine if state regulations speci-
fy filter pack grain size, either in absolute
terms or relative to the grain size of the water
bearing zone, or a uniformity coefficient.
The filter pack should generally extend
from the bottom of the well intake to approx-
imately two to five feet above the top of the
well intake, provided the interval above the
well intake does not result in a hydraulic
connection with an overlying zone. To ensure
that filter pack material completely surrounds
the screen and casing without bridging, the
filter pack can be placed with a tremie pipe (a
small diameter pipe that carries the filter
pack material directly to the filter screen
without creating air pockets within the filter
pack). A layer of fine sand can also be placed
on top of the filter pack to minimize migra-
tion of annular seal material (see below) into
the filter pack.
Annular Seal
Annular space is the space between the
casing and the borehole wall. Any annular
space that is produced as a result of the
installation of well casing in a borehole pro-
vides a channel for vertical movement of
water and/or contaminants unless the space is
sealed. The annular seal in a monitoring well
is placed above the filter pack in the annulus
between the borehole and the well casing.
The seal serves several purposes: to provide
protection against infiltration of surface water
and potential contaminants from the ground
surface down the casing/borehole annulus; to
seal off discrete sampling zones, both
hydraulically and chemically; and to prohibit
vertical migration of water. Such vertical
movement can cause "cross contamination"
which can influence the representativeness of
ground-water samples. The annular seal can
be comprised of several different types of per-
manent, stable, low-permeability materials
including pelletized, granular, or powdered
bentonite; neat cement grout; and combina-
tions of both. The most effective seals are
obtained by using expanding materials that
will not shrink away from either the casing or
the borehole wall after curing or setting.
Surface Seal
A surface seal is an above-ground seal that
protects a monitoring well from surface water
and contaminant infiltration. Monitoring wells
should have a surface seal of neat cement or
concrete surrounding the well casing and fill-
ing the annular space between the casing and
the borehole at the surface. The surface seal
can be an extension of the annular seal
installed above the filter pack, or it can be a
separate seal placed on top of the annular
9-11
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
seal. The surface seal will generally extend to
at least three feet away from the well casing at
the surface and taper down to the size of the
borehole within a few feet of the surface. In
climates with alternating freezing and thawing
conditions, the cement surface should extend
below the frost depth to prevent potential well
damage caused by frost heaving.
Surface Completions
Surface completions are protective casings
installed around the well casing. Two types of
surface completions are common for ground-
water monitoring wells: above-ground com-
pletion, and flush-to- ground completion.
The primary purposes of either type of com-
pletion are to prevent surface runoff from
entering and infiltrating down the annulus of
the well and to protect the well from acciden-
tal damage or vandalism.
In an above-ground completion, which is
the preferred alternative, a protective casing is
generally installed around the well casing by
placing the protective casing into the cement
surface seal while it is still wet and uncured.
The protective casing discourages unautho-
rized entry into the well, prevents damage by
contact with vehicles, and reduces degrada-
tion caused by direct exposure to sunlight.
The protective casing should be fitted with a
locking cap and installed so that there are at
least one to two inches clearance between the
top of the in-place, inner well, casing cap and
the bottom of the protective casing locking
cap when in the locked position.
Like the inner well casing, the outer pro-
tective casing should be vented near the top
to prevent the accumulation and entrapment
of potentially explosive gases and to allow
water levels in the well to respond naturally
to barometric pressure changes. Additionally,
the outer protective casing should have a
drain hole installed just above the top of the
cement level in the space between the protec-
tive casing and the well casing. This drain
allows trapped water to drain away from the
casing. In high-traffic areas or in areas where
heavy equipment might be working, consider
the installation of additional protection such
as "bumper guards." Bumper guards are
brightly-painted posts of wood, steel, or some
other durable material set in cement and
located within three or four feet of the well.
2.
Well Installation
To ensure collection of representative
ground-water samples, the well intake, filter
pack, and annular seal need to be properly
installed. In cohesive unconsolidated material
or consolidated formations, well intakes
should be installed as an integral part of the
casing string by lowering the entire unit into
the open borehole and placing the well intake
opposite the interval to be monitored.
Centralizing devices are typically used to cen-
ter the casing and intake in the borehole to
allow uniform installation of the filter pack
material around the well intake. In non-cohe-
sive, unconsolidated materials there are other
standardized techniques to ensure the proper
installation of wells, such as the use of a cas-
ing hammer, a cable tool technique, the dual-
wall reverse-circulation method, or
installation through the hollow stem of a hol-
low-stem auger.
3. Well Development
Monitoring well development is the
removal of fine particulate matter, commonly
clay and silt, from the geologic formation
near the well intake. If particulate matter is
not removed, as water moves through the for-
mation into the well, the water sampled will
be turbid, and the viability of the water quali-
ty analyses will be impaired. When pumping
during well development, the movement of
water is unidirectional toward the well.
Therefore, there is a tendency for the partial -
9-12
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
lates moving toward the well to "bridge"
together or form blockages that restrict subse-
quent particulate movement. These blockages
can prevent the complete development of the
well capacity. This effect potentially impacts
the quality of the water entering the well.
Development techniques should remove such
bridges and encourage the movement of par-
ticulates into the well. These particulates can
then be removed from the well by bailer or
pump and, in most cases, the water produced
will subsequently be clear and non-turbid.
In most instances, monitoring wells
installed in consolidated formations can be
developed without great difficulty. Monitoring
wells also can usually be developed rapidly
and without great difficulty in sand and grav-
el deposits. However, many installations are
made in thin, silty and/or clayey zones. It is
not uncommon for these zones to be difficult
to develop sufficiently for adequate samples
to be collected.
F. Duration and Frequency
of Monitoring
The duration of ground-water monitoring
will depend on the length of the active life of
the waste management unit and its post-clo-
sure care period. Continued monitoring after
a waste management unit has closed is
important because the potential for contami-
nant releases remains even after a unit has
stopped receiving waste. Monitoring frequen-
cy should be sufficient to allow detection of
ground-water contamination. This frequency
usually ranges from quarterly to annually.
What site characteristics should
be evaluated to determine the
frequency of monitoring?
Ground-water flow velocity is important in
establishing an appropriate ground-water
monitoring frequency to ensure that samples
collected are physically and statistically inde-
pendent. For example, in areas with high
ground-water flow velocity, more frequent
monitoring might be necessary to detect a
release before it migrates and contaminates
large areas. In areas with low flow velocity,
less frequent monitoring might be appropri-
ate. It is important to analyze background
ground-water conditions, such as flow direc-
tion, velocity, and seasonal fluctuations to
help determine a suitable monitoring fre-
quency for a site. You should consult with the
appropriate state agency to determine an
appropriate monitoring frequency. In the
absence of state requirements, it is recom-
mended that semi-annual monitoring be con-
ducted to detect contamination as part of a
basic monitoring program.
G. Sampling Parameters
Selection of parameters to be monitored in a
ground-water monitoring program should be
based on the characteristics of waste in the
management unit. Additional sampling and
analysis information can be found in EPA SW-
846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (U.S.
EPA, 1986) and in ASTM's standards. The
Annual Book ofASTM Standards also identifies
18 ASTM guides and practices for performing
waste characterization and sampling.
What are sampling parameters?
Analyzing a large number of ground-water
quality parameters in each sampling episode
can be costly. To minimize expense, select
only contaminants and geochemical indicators
that can be reasonably expected to migrate to
the ground water. These are called sampling
parameters. Sampling parameters should pro-
vide an early indication of a release from a
waste management unit. Once contamination
is detected, consider expanding the original
9-13
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
sampling parameters and monitor for addi-
tional constituents to fully characterize the
chemical makeup of the release.
What sampling parameters
should be used?
Due to the broad universe of industrial
solid waste, it is not possible to recommend a
list of indicator papameters that are capable
of identifying every possible release. It is rec-
ommended to begin by analyzing for a broad
range of parameters to establish background
ground-water quality and then use the results
to select the sampling parameters to be moni-
tored subsequently at a site. Table 2 lists
potential parameters for a basic ground-water
monitoring program, by different categories.
Modify these parameters, as appropriate, to
address site-specific circumstances. Your
knowledge of the actual waste streams or
existing analytical data is a preliminary guide
for what should be monitored, and leachate
sampling data is also useful to select or adjust
sampling parameters. Where there is uncer-
tainty concerning the chemistry of the waste,
you should perform metal and organic scans
at a minimum. You should consult with the
appropriate state agency to ensure that appro-
priate sampling parameters are selected.
What are the minimum
components of a basic
monitoring program?
Table 3 summarizes the recommended
minimum components of a basic ground-
water monitoring program described above.
Potential modifications to the basic monitor-
ing program that might be appropriate based
on site-specific waste management unit con-
ditions are discussed later in this chapter.
H. Potential Modifications
to a Basic Ground-Water
Monitoring Program
It might be appropriate to modify certain
elements of the basic ground-water monitoring
program described above to accommodate site-
specific circumstances. When using the IWEM
software to evaluate the need for a liner system,
if the recommendation is to use a composite
liner, then the basic ground-water monitoring
program should probably be enhanced. If the
recommendation using the software is that no
liner is appropriate, then it might be possible to
scale back some aspects of the basic ground-
water monitoring program.
Components that might be subject to mod-
ification include the duration and frequency
of monitoring, sampling parameters, and the
use of vadose zone monitoring. Possible mod-
ifications of these elements are discussed fur-
ther below. You should consult with the
appropriate state officials on their require-
ments for ground-water monitoring programs.
In some states, a unit might be eligible for a
no-migration exemption from the state's
ground-water monitoring requirements.
1. Duration and Frequency of
Monitoring
The duration of monitoring (active life
plus post-closure care) is not likely to be
modified in either a reduced or an enhanced
ground-water monitoring program.
Adjustments to the frequency of monitoring,
however, might be appropriate, based primar-
ily on the mobility of contaminants and
ground- water velocity. For example, if the
sampling parameters are slow moving metals,
annual rather than semi-annual monitoring
might be appropriate. Conversely, quarterly
monitoring might be considered at a unit
with a rapid ground-water flow rate or a
9-14
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 2
Potential Parameters for Basic Ground-Water Monitoring
(Potential Parameters Should be Selected Based on Site-Specific Circumstances)
Category
Specific Parameters
Field-Measured Parameters
Temperature
pH
Specific electrical conductance
Dissolved oxygen
Eh oxidation-reduction potential
Turbidity
Leachate Indicators
Total organic carbon (TOC-filtered)
pH
Specific conductance
Manganese (Mn)
Iron (Fe)
Ammonium (NH^)
Chloride (Cl)
Sodium (Na)
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Total Halogenated Compounds (TOX)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Total dissolved solids (TDS)
Additional Major Water Quality Parameters
Bicarbonate (HCO3)
Boron (Bo)
Carbonate (CO3)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluoride (Fl)
Magnesium (Mg)
Nitrate (NO3)
Nitrogen (disolved N2)
Potassium (K)
Sulfate (SO^)
Silicon (H2SiO4)
Strontium (Sr)
Total dissolved solids (TDS)
Minor and Trace Inorganics
Initial background sampling of inorganics for which drink-
ing water standards exist (arsenic, barium, cadmium,
chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver); ongoing moni-
toring of any constituents showing background near or
above drinking water standards.
Waste-Specific Constituents
Selected based on knowledge of waste characteristics (ini-
tial metals and organic scans at a minimum).
9-15
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 3 Recommended Components of a Basic Ground-Water Monitoring Program
Monitoring Component Recommended Minimum
Number of Wells
Point of Monitoring
Duration of Monitoring
Frequency of Monitoring
Sampling Parameters
Minimum 1 upgradient and 3 downgradient.4
Waste management unit boundary or out to 150 meters
down gradient of the waste management unit area.5
Active life plus post-closure care.
Semi-annual during active life.6
Metal and organic scans, use of indicators, leachate analysis,
and/or knowledge of the waste. See the categories listed in
Table 2.
mobile contaminant such as cyanide over a
permeable sand and gravel aquifer.
2. Sampling Parameters
The basic recommended ground-water
monitoring program already recommends the
use of a parameter list that is tailored to the
waste characteristics and site hydrogeology.
Where the use of the IWEM software indi-
cates no liner is appropriate, it might be pos-
sible to reduce the list of parameters
routinely analyzed in downgradient wells to
only a few indicator parameters. More com-
plete analysis would only be initiated if a sig-
nificant change in the concentration of an
indicator parameter had occurred.
3. Vadose-Zone Monitoring
The vadose zone is the region between the
ground surface and the saturated zone.
Depending on climate, soils, and geology, it
can range in thickness from several feet to
hundreds of feet. Vadose-zone monitoring
can detect migration of contaminants before
they reach ground water, serving as an early
warning system if a waste management unit
is not functioning as designed. It can also
reduce the time and cost of remediation, and
the extent of subsequent ground-water moni-
toring efforts.
If site conditions permit, it might be desir-
able to include vadose-zone monitoring as
part of the overall ground-water program. If
vadose-zone monitoring is incorporated, the
recommended number of ground-water mon-
itoring wells would be determined by the
basic ground-water monitoring program, and
background quality would still need to be
characterized with ground-water monitoring.
The ground-water monitoring program
becomes a backup, however, with full use
only being initiated if contaminant migration
is detected in the vadose zone. The sections
9-16
The actual number of both upgradient and downgradient wells will vary from unit-to-unit and will
depend on the actual site-specific conditions.
Discussion of EPA's rationale for the point of monitoring being out to 150 meters from a unit's bound-
ary can be found in 40 CFR Part 258 criteria.
Ground-water flow rate might dictate that more or less frequent monitoring might be appropriate. More
frequent monitoring might be appropriate at the start of a monitoring program to establish background.
Less frequent and/or reduced in scope monitoring might also be appropriate during the post-closure
care period.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
below describe some of the commonly used
methods for vadose zone monitoring, vadose
zone characterization, and elements to con-
sider in the design of a vadose zone monitor-
ing system.
Vadose-Zone Monitoring Methods
There are dozens of specific techniques for
indirect measurement and direct sampling of
the vadose zone. The more commonly used
methods with potential value for waste man-
agement units are described briefly below.
Soil-Water and Tension Monitoring
Measuring changes over time in soil-water
content or soil-water tension is a relatively
simple and inexpensive method for leak
detection. Periodic measurements of soil water
content or soil moisture tension beneath a
lined waste management unit, for example,
should show only small changes. Significant
increases in water content or decreases in
moisture tension would indicate a leak.
What method should be used to
measure soil moisture?
Soil-moisture characteristics can be mea-
sured in two main ways: 1) water content,
usually expressed as weight percentage, and
2) soil-moisture tension, or suction, which
measures how strongly water is held by soil
particles due to capillary effects. As soil-water
content increases, soil-moisture tension
decreases. Measurements will not indicate,
however, whether contaminants are present.
Figure 2 shows three major methods that
are available for insitu monitoring of soil-
moisture changes. Porous-cup tensiometers
(Figure 2a) measure soil-moisture tension,
with the pressure measurements indicated by
using either a mercury manometer, a vacuum
gauge, or pressure transducers. Soil-moisture
resistivity sensors (Figure 2b) measure either
water content or soil-moisture tension,
depending on how they are calibrated. Time-
domain reflectometry probes (Figure 2c)
measure water content using induced electro-
magnetic currents. For vadose-zone monitor-
ing applications, the devices are usually
placed during construction of a waste man-
agement unit and electrical cables run to one
or more central locations for periodic mea-
surement. The other commonly used method
for monitoring soil-water content is to use
neutron or dielectric probes. These require
placement of access tubes, through which
probes are lowered or pulled, and allow con-
tinuous measurement of changes in water
content along the length of the tubes.
Soil-Pore Liquid Sampling
Sampling and analysis of soil-pore liquids
can determine the type and concentration of
contaminants that might be moving through the
vadose zone. Soil-pore liquids can be collected
by applying either a vacuum that exceeds the
soil moisture tension, commonly done using
vacuum or pressure-vacuum lysimeters, or by
burying collectors that intercept drain water.
Figures 3a and 3b illustrate different methods
for collecting soil-pore liquids.
Soil-Gas Sampling
Soil-gas sampling is a relatively easy and
inexpensive way to detect the presence or
movement of volatile contaminants and gases
associated with degradation of waste within a
9-17
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Figure 2. Major Methods for In Situ Monitoring of Soil Moisture or Matrix Potential
Mercury
Manometer
Vacuum
Gage
Pressure
Transducer
ho
1
u
*&
Manual
Observation
A1 r i'./f'- ^)'***'. ..*
—
0
Manual
Observation
•/'^,'^>:^. ,'<:/•>
-
.1
\°-
To Chart F
forContin
Observati
/ •-•^N}^.
Resistance Meter
Ground
Electrodes
(b)
Porous Cup
(a)
(c)
(a) Three Types of Porous Cup Tensiometers, (b) Resistance Sensors, and (c) Time Domain Reflectometry
Probes
Sources: (a) Morrison, 1983. (b) U.S. EPA, 1993. (c) Topp and Davis, 1985, by permission.
waste management unit, such as carbon
dioxide and methane. Of particular concern
are gases associated with the breakdown of
organic materials and toxic organic com-
pounds. Permanent soil-gas monitoring
installations consist of a probe point placed
above the water table, a vacuum pump which
draws soil-gas to the surface, and a syringe
used to extract the gas sample, as shown in
Figure 4a. Installing soil-gas probes at multi-
ple levels, as shown in Figure 4b, allows
detection of downward or upward migration
of soil gases. It is important to note, however,
that the performance of soil-gas sampling can
9-18
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Figure 3. Example Methods for Collecting Soil-Pore Samples
Suction Line
Stopper
-Body Tube
-Porous
Cup
Porous
Cup
(a) Vacuum Lysimeter, (b) Pressure-Vacuum Lysimeter
Source: ASTM, 1994. Copyright ASTM. Reprinted with permission.
be limited by some types of soil, such as tight
clays or tight, saturated clays.
Vadose Zone Characterization
Just as the design of ground-water moni-
toring systems requires an understanding of
the ground-water flow system, the design of
vadose zone monitoring systems requires an
understanding of the vadose zone flow sys-
tem. For example, in ground water systems,
hydraulic conductivity does not change over
time at a particular-location, whereas in the
vadose zone, hydraulic conductivity changes
with soil-water content and soil-moisture ten-
sion. To estimate the speed with which water
will move through the vadose zone, the rela-
tionship between soil-water content, soil-
moisture tension, and hydraulic conductivity
should be measured or estimated.
Unsaturated zone numerical modeling pro-
grams, such as HYDRUS 2-D or Seep (2-D)
are designed to characterize the vadose zone.
Vadose-Zone Monitoring System Design
A vadose zone monitoring system com-
bined with a ground-water monitoring sys-
tem can reduce the cost of corrective
measures in the event of a release. Remedial
action is usually easier and less expensive if
employed before contaminants reach the
ground-water flow system.
The design and installation of a vadose-zone
monitoring system are easiest with new waste
9-19
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Figure 4. Soil Gas Sampling Systems
Flow Valve
Vacuum Gauge
Exhaust
Gas Sample
Syringe
Stainless Steel "T" Fitting
With Chromatographic Septum
Traffic-Rated Cover
Sampling Port
With Valve
Nyla-Flow™ or Teflon™ Sampling Tube
Soil Gas Sampling
Probe Point
Bentonite Plug
Teflon Tubing
Soil Gas Sampling
Probe Point (Dedicated)
(a)
Concrete
No. 3 Monterey Sand
(b)
(a) Gas Sampling Probe and Sample Collection Systems, (b) Typical Installation of Nested Soil Gas Probes
Source: Reprinted with permission from Wilson, et al., Handbook ofVadose Zone Characterization and
Monitoring, 1995. Copyright CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
management facilities, where soil-water moni-
toring and sampling devices can be placed
below the site. Relatively recent improvements
in horizontal drilling technology, however, now
allow installation of access tubes for soil-mois-
ture monitoring beneath existing facilities.
Important factors in choosing the location and
depth of monitoring points in a leak-detection
network include: 1) consideration of the
potential area of downward leakage, and 2)
determination of the effective detection area of
the monitoring device.
Cullen et al. (1995) suggest an approach
to vadose zone monitoring that includes the
following:
9-20
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
• Identification and prioritization of
critical areas most vulnerable to cont-
aminant migration.
• Selection of indirect monitoring
methods that provide reasonably
comprehensive coverage and cost-
effective, early warning of contami-
nant migration.
• Selection of direct monitoring meth-
ods that provide diagnostic confirma-
tion of the presence and migration of
contaminants.
• Identification of background moni-
toring points that will provide hydro-
geologic monitoring data
representative of preexisting site con-
ditions.
• Identification of a cost-efficient, tem-
poral monitoring plan that will pro-
vide early warning of contaminant
migration in the vadose zone.
This approach is very similar to what is
described for the basic ground-water moni-
toring program.
II. Surf ace-Water
Monitoring
Controlling constituent discharges to sur-
face water from industrial waste management
units is another component of responsible
waste management. Monitoring can be con-
ducted for many purposes, such as:
• Characterizing surface-water condi-
tions and identifying changes or
trends in water quality over time.
• Identifying existing or emerging
water quality problems.
• Identifying the types and amounts of
constituents present in the water body.
• Designing a pollution prevention pro-
gram or establishing best manage-
ment practices (BMPs).
• Determining whether surface-water
regulations and permit conditions are
being satisfied.
• Responding to emergencies, such as
accidental discharges or spills.
Some types of monitoring activities meet
several of these purposes simultaneously,
while others are specifically designed for one
purpose, such as to determine compliance
with permit conditions.
If your facility is subject to a federal, state,
or local permit that requires monitoring and
sampling, you must collect and analyze sam-
ples according to the permit requirements.
Otherwise, you should consider implement-
ing a sampling program to monitor the quali-
ty of runoff, the performance of BMPs, and
any impacts on surface waters. For further
information on BMPs relating to surface-
water quality, refer to Chapter 6-Protecting
Surface Water. Implementation of BMPs,
along with regular maintenance inspections
and upkeep, will greatly reduce the potential
for surface-water contamination.
When establishing any type of sampling
and monitoring program, there are certain
common sense guidelines to follow.
Inadequate frequency of data collection and
incomplete monitoring might be useless
while high-frequency monitoring and sam-
pling for numerous constituents can be costly
and could create a backlog of unusable data.
The following discussion summarizes what
you should consider when establishing sam-
pling programs to effectively perform surface
water monitoring.
9-21
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
A. Monitoring Storm-Water
Discharges
As discussed in Chapter 6-Protecting
Surface Water, NPDES permits establish lim-
its on what constituents (and at what
amounts or concentrations) facilities may dis-
charge to receiving surface waters. Some
waste management units, such as surface
impoundments, might have an NPDES per-
mit to discharge wastewaters directly to sur-
face waters. Other units might need an
NPDES permit for storm-water discharges.
An NPDES permit will also contain limits on
what can be discharged, monitoring and
reporting requirements, and other provisions
to ensure that the discharge does not impair
surface-water quality or human health. Due
to the variable nature of storm-water flows
during a rainfall event and the different ana-
lytical considerations for certain constituents,
the sampling requirements for different waste
management unit types and sampling loca-
tions will vary as well. The guidelines and
general sampling procedures outlined below
should be considered when developing a
storm-water sampling program to comply
with permit requirements or to monitor the
quality of runoff and determine the effective-
ness of BMPs.
Sampling a representative storm. Using
climatic data, you can determine the average
rainfall depth and duration of rainfall events
at the waste management unit site. You
should sample during a representative storm
event. The representative storm should be
preceded by at least 72 hours of dry weather
and, when possible, should be between 50
and 150 percent of the average depth and
duration. The time to collect individual grab
samples is during the first flush (i.e., the first
30 minutes of the event), and composite
samples should then be collected over the
first 3 hours, or the entire event if less than 3
hours. These guidelines help ensure that con-
stituents in the sampled runoff will not be so
concentrated or so dilute as to be unrepre-
sentative of the overall runoff.
Determining the sample type. A grab
sample is a discrete, individual sample taken
within a short period of time, usually less
than 15 minutes. Analysis of a grab sample
characterizes the quality of a storm water-dis-
charge at the time the sample was taken.
These types of samples can be used to char-
acterize the maximum concentration of a
constituent in the discharge.
A composite sample is a mixed or com-
bined sample that is formed by combining a
series of individual and discrete samples of
specific volumes at specified intervals. These
intervals can be either time-weighted or flow-
weighted. Time-weighted composite samples
are collected and combined in proportion to
time, while flow-weighted composite samples
are combined in proportion to flow.
Composite samples characterize the quality
of a storm-water discharge over a specific
period of time, such as the duration of a
storm event.
Determining the sample techniques.
Grab and composite samples can be collected
by either manual or automatic sampling tech-
niques. Manual samples are simply collected
by hand, while automatic samples are collect-
ed by powered devices according to prepro-
grammed criteria. Both techniques have
advantages and disadvantages that need to be
weighed when choosing a sampling tech-
nique for a specific site. The advantages of
manual sampling include its appropriateness
for all constituents and its lower cost com-
pared to automatic sampling. Manual sam-
pling, however, can be labor intensive, can
expose personnel to potentially hazardous
conditions, and is subject to human error.
The advantages of automatic sampling are
the convenience it offers, its minimum labor
requirements, its reduction of personnel
9-22
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
exposure to hazardous conditions, and its
low risk of human error. Unfortunately, auto-
matic sampling is not suitable for all con-
stituent types. Volatile organic compounds
(VOC), for example, can not be sampled
automatically due to the agitation during
sample collection. This agitation can cause
the VOC constituents to completely volatilize
from the sample. Other constituents such as
fecal streptococcus, fecal coliform, and chlo-
rine might also not be amenable to automatic
sampling due to their short holding times.
Since sample temperature and pH need to be
measured immediately, the option for using
automatic sampling for these parameters is
limited as well. Automatic sampling can also
be expensive, and does require a certain
amount of training. Table 4 presents a com-
parison of manual and automatic sampling
techniques.
Sampling at the outfall point. Storm-
water samples should be taken at a storm-
water point source. A "point source" is
defined as any discernible, confined, and dis-
crete conveyance. The ideal sampling loca-
tion is often the lowest point in a drainage
area where a conveyance discharges, such as
the discharge at the end of a pipe or ditch.
The sample point should be easily accessible
on foot and in a location that will not cause
hazardous sampling conditions. You should
not sample during dangerous wind, light-
ning, flooding, or other unsafe conditions. If
these conditions are unavoidable during an
event, then the sampling should be delayed
until a less hazardous event occurs.
Preferably, the sampling location will be
located onsite, but if it is not, obtain permis-
sion from the owner of the property where
the discharge is located. Inaccessible dis-
charge points, numerous small point dis-
charges, run-on from other properties, and
infinite other scenarios can cause logistical
problems with sampling locations. If the dis-
charge is inaccessible or not likely to be rep-
resentative of the runoff, samples might need
to be taken at a point further upstream of the
discharge pipe or at several locations to best
characterize site runoff.
Coordinating with the laboratory. It is
important to collect adequate sample vol-
umes to complete all necessary analyses.
When testing for certain constituents, sam-
ples might need to be cooled or otherwise
preserved until analyzed to yield meaningful
results. Section 3.5 of EPAs NPDES Storm
Water Sampling Guidance Document (U.S. EPA,
1992) contains information on proper sample
handling and preservation procedures.
Submitting the proper information to the lab-
oratory is important in ensuring proper sam-
ple handling by the laboratory. Proper sample
documentation guidelines are outlined in
Section 3.7 of the NPDES Storm Water
Sampling Guidance Document. Coordination
with the laboratory that will be performing
the analysis will help ensure that these issues
are adequately addressed.
You are required to follow all sampling
and monitoring requirements in an NPDES
permit. If there are no sampling require-
ments, analyze runoff for basic constituents,
such as oil and grease, pH, biochemical oxy-
gen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen
demand (COD), total suspended solids
(TSS), phosphorus, and nitrogen, as well as
any other constituents known or suspected to
be present in the waste, such as heavy metals
or other toxic constituents.
Additional sampling guidance can be
obtained from EPAs NPDES Storm Water
Sampling Guidance Document (U.S. EPA,
1992) and Interim Final RCRA Facility
Investigation (RFI) Guidance: Volume III (U.S.
EPA, 1989). In addition, state and local envi-
ronmental agencies also have guidance on
appropriate sampling methods.
There is a national system that provides
permitting information for facilities holding
9-23
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 4
Comparison of Manual and Automatic Sampling Techniques
Sample Method
Advantages
Disadvantages
Manual Grabs
Manual Flow-
Weighted
Composites
(multiple grabs)
Automatic Grabs
Automatic Flow-
Weighted
Composites
• Generally appropriate for all
constituents
• Minimum equipment required
• Generally appropriate for all
constituents
• Minimum equipment required
• Minimizes labor requirements
• Low risk of human error
• Reduced personnel exposure to
unsafe conditions
• Sampling can be triggered
remotely or initiated according to
present conditions
• Minimizes labor requirements
• Low risk of human error
• Reduced personnel exposure to
unsafe conditions
• Can eliminate the need for
manual compositing of aliquots
• Sampling can be triggered remotely
or initiated according to onsite
conditions
• Labor-intensive
• Environment possibly dangerous to field personnel
• Might be difficult to get personnel and equipment
to the storm water outfall within the first 30
minutes of the event
• Possible human error
• Labor-intensive
• Environment possibly dangerous to field personnel
• Human error can have significant impact on
sample representativeness
• Requires that flow measurements be taken during
sampling
• Samples not collected for oil and grease, might
not be representative
• Automatic samplers generally cannot properly
collect samples for VOC analysis
• Costly if numerous sampling sites require the
purchase of equipment
• Can require equipment installation and
maintenance; can malfunction
• Can require operator training
• Might not be appropriate for pH and temperature
• Might not be appropriate for parameters with
short holding times (e.g., fecal streptococcus,
fecal coliform, chlorine)
• Cross-contamination of aliquot if tubing/bottles
not washed
• Generally not acceptable for VOC sampling
• Costly if numerous sampling sites require the
purchase of equipment
• Can require equipment installation and
maintenance; can malfunction
• Can require operator training
• Can require that flow measures be taken during
sampling
• Cross-contamination of aliquot if tubing/bottles
not washed
Source: U.S. EPA, 1992.
9-24
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
NPDES permits. This system is called the
Permits Compliance System (PCS) and it
allows users to retrieve information regarding
facilities holding NPDES permits, including
permit limits and actual monitoring data. You
can specify the desired information by using
any combination of facility name, geographic
location, standard industrial classification
(SIC) code, and chemical names. The PCS
database can be accessed at .
B. Monitoring Discharges
to POTWs
As discussed in the Chapter 6-Protecting
Surface Water, industrial facilities discharging
to a POTW might have to meet "pretreatment
standards." If so,, they will be subject to cer-
tain requirements under a local pretreatment
program. The National Pretreatment Program
requires certain POTWs in defined circum-
stances to develop a local pretreatment pro-
gram (see 40 CFR Section 403.8(a)). The
actual requirement for a POTW to develop
and implement a local program is a condition
of the POTWs NPDES permit.
Sampling is the most common method for
verifying compliance with pretreatment stan-
dards. Monitoring locations are usually desig-
nated by the local municipality administering
the pretreatment program and will be such
that compliance with permitted discharge
limits can be determined. Monitoring loca-
tions should be appropriate for waste stream
conditions, be representative of the discharge,
have no bypass capabilities, and allow for
unrestricted access at all times (see 40 CFR
Section 403.12).
EPAs General Pretreatment Regulations
require POTWs to monitor each significant
industrial user (SIU) at least annually (see 40
CFR Section 403.8 (f)(2)(v)) and each SIU to
self-monitor semi-annually although permits
issued by the local control authority might
require more frequent monitoring (see 40
CFR Section 403.12 (g) and (h)). The local
municipality will develop and implement
standard operating procedures and policies
that specify the sample collection and han-
dling protocols in accordance with 40 CFR
Part 136.
Sampling for constituents such as pH,
cyanide, oil and grease, flashpoint, and VOCs
will require manual collection of grab sam-
ples (see 40 CFR Section 403.12 (b)(5)).
Similar to composite samples, grab samples
must be representative (see 40 CFR Section
403.12 (g)(4)) of the discharge and must be
collected from actively flowing waste streams.
Fluctuations in flow or the nature of the dis-
charge might require collection and hand-
compositing of more than one grab sample to
accurately access compliance. Flow-weighted
composite samples are preferred over time-
weighted composite samples, particularly
where the monitored discharge is intermittent
or variable. The local authorities can waive
flow-weighted composite sampling if an
industrial user demonstrates that flow-
weighted sampling is not feasible. In these
cases, time-weighted composite samples can
be collected (see 40 CFR Section 403.12
(b)(5)(iii)). Refer to EPA's Industrial User
Inspection and Sampling Manual for POTWs
(U.S. EPA, 1994a) for additional information
on sample collection and analysis procedures
for the pretreatment program.
If you are subject to pretreatment require-
ments and must conduct sampling to demon-
strate compliance, the requirements
established for your site by the local control
authority apply. These include following the
proper sample collection and handling proto-
cols and being able to prove that you did so
(i.e., by keeping sampling records; noting
location, date, and time of sample collection;
maintaining chain of custody forms showing
the link between field personnel and the lab-
9-25
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
oratory) (see 40 CFR Section 403.12(o)).
Consult EPA's Introduction to the National
Pretreatment Program document (U.S. EPA,
1999) for further information on monitoring
requirements under the National
Pretreatment Program.
C. Monitoring Surface
Water Conditions
In order to determine if runoff from your
waste management unit is impacting adjacent
surface waters you might want to consider
establishing a surface-water quality monitor-
ing program. Chemical, physical, and biolog-
ical data can provide information about the
effectiveness of BMPs. The data collected will
help you to characterize any overall water
quality at the selected monitoring sites, iden-
tify problem areas, and document any
changes in water quality.
In designing your program, one of the
most important things to consider is what
types of parameters to monitor (chemical,
physical, and/or biological) that will enable
you to determine how your waste manage-
ment unit might be impacting the aquatic
ecosystem. Determining where you should
set-up a monitoring station is also very
important and will depend on relevant
hydrologic, geologic, and meteorologic fac-
tors. For assistance and more information on
establishing water quality sampling stations
and a sampling program you should consult
with state and local water quality planning
agencies. Additional guidance on establishing
sampling and monitoring programs can be
obtained from EPA's Volunteer Stream
Monitoring Document (U.S. EPA, 1997) and
Volunteer Lake Monitoring Document (U.S.
EPA, 1991). Monitoring can be conducted at
regular sites on a continuous basis ("fixed
station" monitoring); at selected sites on an
as needed basis or to answer specific ques-
tions ("intensive surveys"); on a temporary or
seasonal basis (e.g., during periods of intense
rainfall); or on an emergency basis (i.e., an
accidental spill or discharge).
Why is the monitoring taking
place?
You should first determine the purpose of
establishing a surface-water monitoring pro-
gram. Reasons for monitoring surface water
can include developing baseline characteriza-
tion data prior to a waste management unit
being constructed, documenting water quali-
ty changes over time, screening for potential
water quality problems, determining the
effectiveness of BMPs, or determining the
impact of the waste management unit on sur-
face waters.
How will the data be used?
The data collected will help you to identify
constituents of concern, the impacts of pollu-
tion and pollution control activities (i.e.,
BMPs), and trends in water quality. Note that
the data you collect might also be useful to
regional or local water quality planning
offices that might already be collecting simi-
lar data in other parts of the watershed.
What parameters or conditions
will be monitored?
The basic parameters that are indicators of
general water quality health, include dissolved
oxygen (DO), pH, total suspended solids
(TSS), nitrogen, hardness, temperature, and
phosphorous. In addition, you might choose
to monitor parameters that would indicate
whether the designated use (e.g., fisheries,
recreation) of the water body is being met (as
discussed in Chapter 6-Protecting Surface
Water). Further, based on the types of con-
stituents associated with the waste manage-
ment unit, you should also sample for
contaminants that would indicate whether
your surface-water protection measures are
9-26
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
functioning properly (e.g., heavy metals,
organics, or other materials associated with the
unit). In many cases, a few surrogate con-
stituents can be selected instead of analyzing a
complete spectrum of constituents. For exam-
ple, lead, zinc, or cadmium are often selected
to indicate pollution by toxic metals. Instead
of analyzing for every possible pathogenic
microorganism, total and fecal coliform bacte-
ria analyses are commonly used to indicate
bacterial and viral contamination. Chemical
oxygen demand (COD) and total organic car-
bon (TOC) are used in high-frequency grab
sampling programs as indicators of pollution
by organics.
Where should the monitoring
sites/stations be located?
In order to determine if the waste manage-
ment unit is having an impact on surface
water it is important to determine the quality
of the water upstream from the unit as well as
downstream. You should also consider the
number of sites to establish how accessible,
safe, and convenient potential sites are. In
addition, it is important to determine if poten-
tial sites are near tributary inflows, dams,
bridges, or other structures that might affect
the sampling results. You should also deter-
mine if you will establish permanent sampling
stations (i.e., structures or buildings) or if the
stations will simply be designated points with-
in the watershed.
What sampling methods should
be used?
You must decide how the samples will be
collected, what sampling equipment will be
used (e.g., automatic samplers or by hand),
what equipment preparation methods are
necessary (e.g., container sterilization, meter
calibration), and what protocols will be fol-
lowed. Refer to Part II, Section A of this
chapter for a discussion of determining sam-
pling methods. EPA's SW-846 also provides
guidance on selecting the appropriate sam-
pling methods.
When will the monitoring occur?
You need to establish how frequently mon-
itoring will take place, what time of year is
best for sampling, and what time of day is
best for sampling. Monitoring at the same
time of day and at regular intervals helps
ensure comparability of data over time. In
general, monthly chemical sampling and
twice yearly biological sampling are consid-
ered adequate to identify water quality
changes over time. If you are conducting bio-
logical sampling, it should be conducted at
the same time each year because of natural
seasonal variations in the aquatic ecosystem.
Note that the frequency of sampling should
be increased during the rainy season as this is
when contamination from waste management
units is expected to increase due to storm-
water runoff.
How can the quality of the data
collected be ensured?
You should develop a quality assurance
plan to ensure that quality assurance and
quality control procedures are implemented
at all times. In addition, the personnel con-
ducting the sampling should be properly
trained and consider how to manage the data
after the data have been collected.
Hydrologic and water quality information
is also collected and published regularly by
EPA and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
Both agencies have computerized systems for
storing and retrieving information on water
quality that are available on the Internet.
Water quantity and flow data in streams is
also available from USGS which has offices in
every state. USGS also operates two national
stream water quality networks, the
Hydrologic Benchmark Network (HBN) and
9-27
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
EPA's Water Quality Data
Management Systems
EPA maintains two data management sys-
tems containing water quality information:
the Legacy Data Center (LDC) and STORET.
The LDC contains historical water quality
data dating back to the early part of the 20th
century and collected up to the end of 1998.
STORET (short for STOrage and RETrieval)
contains data collected beginning in 1999,
along with older data that has been properly
documented and migrated from the LDC.
Both systems contain biological, chemi-
cal, and physical data on surface and
ground water collected by federal, state and
local agencies, Indian Tribes, volunteer
groups, academics, and others. All 50 states,
territories, and jurisdictions of the U.S. are
represented.
Each sampling result in these databases is
accompanied by information on where the
sample was taken (e.g., latitude, longitude,
state, county, Hydrologic Unit Code), when
the sample was gathered, the medium sam-
pled (e.g., water, sediment, fish tissue), and
the name of the organization that sponsored
the monitoring. In addition, STORET con-
tains information on why the data were
gathered; the sampling and analytical meth-
ods used; and the quality control checks
used when sampling, handling, and analyz-
ing the data.
The LDC and STORET databases are
Web-enabled. With a standard Web brows-
er, you can browse both systems interactive-
ly or create files to be downloaded to your
computer. For more information on the
LDC and STORET data management sys-
tems and how the water quality data can be
obtained visit EPA's STORET Web site at
.
the National Stream Quality Accounting
Network (NASQAN). These networks were
established to provide national and regional
descriptions of stream water quality condi-
tions and trends, based on uniform monitor-
ing of selected watersheds throughout the
United States, and to improve our under-
standing of the effects of the natural environ-
ment and human activities on water quality.
Stream water quality measurements are avail-
able for the approximate periods 1973 to
1995 for NASQAN and 1962 to 1995 for
HBN. For more information on how to
obtain this water quality information, visit
the USGS Web site at .
III. Soil Monitoring
This section focuses primarily on estab-
lishing a soil monitoring program for land
application purposes. Much of the following
discussion concerning sampling methods,
protocols, and quality assurance and quality
control, however, also is applicable to soil
monitoring for corrective action site assess-
ments. Part I of Chapter 10-Taking
Corrective Action outlines which parameters
to consider when performing soil investiga-
tions for corrective action purposes. For
more information on corrective action unit
assessments, refer to the North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service's Soil facts:
Careful Soil Sampling - The Key to Reliable Soil
Test Information (AG-439-30), the University
of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Institute
of Agriculture and Natural Resources'
Guidelines for Soil Sampling (G91-1000-A),
and EPA's RCRA Facility Investigation
Guidance: Volume II: Soil, Ground Water and
Subsurface Gas Releases (U.S. EPA, 1989). As
discussed in Part I of this chapter, soil moni-
toring can be used to detect the presence of
waste constituents in the soil and track their
9-28
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
migration before they reach ground water.
Characterizing the soil properties at a land
application site can also help you determine
the application rates that will maximize waste
assimilation.
To obtain site-specific data on actual soil
conditions, the soil should be sampled and
characterized. The number and location of
samples necessary for adequate soil character-
ization is primarily a function of the variabili-
ty of the soils at a site. If the soil types occur
in simple patterns, a composite sample of
each major soil type can provide an accurate
picture of the soil characteristics. The depth
to which the soil profile is sampled, and the
extent to which each horizon is vertically
subdivided, will depend on the parameters to
be analyzed, the vertical variations in soil
character, and the objectives of the soil sam-
pling program. You should rely on a qualified
soil scientist to perform this characterization.
Poorly conducted soil sampling can result in
an inaccurate soil characterization which
could lead to improper application of waste
and failure of the unit to properly assimilate
the applied waste.
A. Determining the Quality
of Soil
Soil quality is an assessment of how well
soil performs all of its functions, not just how
well it assimilates waste. Measuring crop yield,
nutrient levels, water quality, or any other sin-
gle outcome alone will not give you a com-
plete assessment of a soil's quality. The
minerals and microbes in soil are responsible
for filtering, buffering, degrading, immobiliz-
ing, and detoxifying organic and inorganic
materials, including those applied to the land
and deposited by the atmosphere. Determining
the quality of a soil is an assessment of how it
performs all of these functions in addition to
waste assimilation. For assessing soil quality in
relation to land application units, it will be
Examples of Indicators of Soil Quality
Indicator
Soil organic matter (SOM).
PHYSICAL: soil structure,
depth of soil, infiltration and bulk
density, water holding capacity.
CHEMICAL: pH, electrical
conductivity, extractable nitrogen-
phosphorous-potassium .
BIOLOGICAL: microbial biomass,
carbon and nitrogen, potentially
mineralizable nitrogen, soil
supplying potential, microbial
activity measure.
Relationship to Soil Health
Soil fertility, structure, stability, nutrient retention,
soil erosion.
Retention and transport of water
and nutrients, habitat for
microbes, estimate of crop productivity potential,
compaction, water movement, porosity, workability.
Biological and chemical activity
thresholds, plant and microbial
activity thresholds, plant available nutrients and
potential for nitrogen and phosphorous loss.
Microbial catalytic potential and
repository for carbon and
nitrogen, soil productivity and
respiration.
9-29
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
important for the soil to be able to filter the
waste constituents and cycle nutrients such as
carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.
Measuring soil quality requires the use of
physical, chemical, and biological indicators,
which can be assessed by qualitative or quan-
titative techniques. After measurements are
collected, they can be evaluated by looking
for patterns and comparing results to mea-
surements taken at a different time or field.
For more information, consult the Guidelines
for Soil Quality Assessment prepared by the
Soil Quality Institute of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (formerly the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service).
B. Sampling Location and
Frequency
Prior to sampling, divide the land applica-
tion unit into uniform areas, then collect rep-
resentative samples from each area. These
divisions should be based upon soil type,
slope, degree of erosion, cropping history,
known crop growth differences, and any
other factors that might influence nutrient
levels in the soil. One recommended
approach is to divide the unit into areas no
larger than 20 acres and to collect at least
one sample from each of these areas.
Each sample for a designated area consists
of a predetermined number of soil cores. A
soil core is an individual boring at one spot
in the field. The recommended number of
cores per sample are 15-20 cores for a sur-
face soil sample and 6-8 cores for a subsur-
face sample. If using a soil probe, a single
core can be separated into its horizontal lay-
ers to provide samples for each layer being
analyzed. For example, a single core could be
divided into four predefined layers such as
surface soil, subsurface soil, and two deep
subsurface soil. For a designated area, all the
individual cores are combined according to
soil level and mixed to provide a composite
sample for the area. From the mixed cores a
composite subsample should be taken and
analyzed. Each grab sample can be analyzed
individually, rather than combined, as part of
a composite sample (discussed below), but
composite samples generally provide reliable
data for soil characterization.
Soil core grab samples can be collected at
random or in a grid pattern. Random collec-
tion generally requires the least amount of
time, but cores must be collected from the
entire area to ensure reliable site characteriza-
tion. When performed properly, random
sampling will provide an accurate assessment
of average soil nutrient and constituent lev-
els. While the preparation required for col-
lecting core samples in a grid pattern can be
more costly and time consuming, it does
ensure that the entire area is sampled. An
advantage of grid sampling is the ability to
generate detailed nutrient level maps for a
land application unit. This requires analysis
of each individual grab sample from an area,
rather than compositing samples. Analyzing
each individual grab sample is time consum-
ing and expensive, but software and comput-
erized applicators are becoming available that
can use these data to tailor nutrient applica-
tion to soil needs.
You should determine baseline conditions
by sampling the soil before waste application
begins. Subsequent sampling will depend on
land use and any state or local soil monitor-
ing requirements. After waste is applied to
the land application unit, you should collect
and analyze samples at regular intervals, or
after a certain number of applications. You
should sample annually, at a minimum, or
more frequently, if appropriate.
The frequency of sampling, the micronu-
trients, the macronutrients, and the con-
stituents to be analyzed will depend on
site-specific soil, water, plant, and waste
9-30
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
characteristics. Local agricultural extension
services, which have experience with design-
ing soil-sampling programs, can assist in this
area. Soil monitoring, especially when cou-
pled with ground-water monitoring, can
detect contamination problems. Early detec-
tion allows changes to be made to the land
application process to remedy the problems
and to conduct corrective action if necessary.
Finally, soil testing after the active life of the
unit has ended is recommended to determine
if any residues remain in the soil.
C. Sampling Equipment
There are a number of soil sampling
devices available. A soil probe or tube is the
most desirable, as it provides a continuous
core with minimal disturbance of the soil.
Sample cores from a soil probe can be divid-
ed by depth and provide surface, subsurface,
and deep subsurface samples from a single
boring. When the soil is too wet, too dry, or
frozen, however, soil probes are not very
effective. The presence of gravel in the soil
will also prevent the use of a soil probe.
When sampling excessively wet, dry, or
frozen soils, or soils with gravel, a soil auger
can be used in place of a soil probe. Because
of their tendency to mix soils from different
depths during sample collection, a soil auger
should only be used when the use of a soil
probe is not possible. A spade can also be
used for surface samples, but it is not effec-
tive for subsurface sampling. Post-hole dig-
gers can be used for collecting deeper
subsurface samples, but they present the
same mixing problem as soil augers. EPAs
Description and Sampling of Contaminated Soils:
A Field Pocket Guide (U.S. EPA, 1991) con-
tains a description of various hand-held and
power-driven tube samplers. The guide also
outlines the recommended applications and
limitations for each sampling device.
D. Sample Collection
Initial soil characterization samples are
typically taken from each distinct soil horizon
down to a depth of 4-5 feet (120-150 cm).
For example, a single core sample might pro-
vide the following four horizon samples: sur-
face (0-6 inches), subsurface (6-18 inches),
and two deep subsurface (18-30 inches and
30-42 inches). For subsequent evaluations, it
is important to sample more than just the
surface layer to determine if the land applica-
tion rate is appropriate and that the quality of
soil is not being detrimentally affected.
Sampling subsurface layers will indicate
whether waste constituents are being
removed and assimilated as expected and are
not leaching into subsurface layers or the
groundwater. As a minimum practice, sample
at least the upper soil layer (0-6 inches) and
at least one deeper soil layer (e.g., 18-30
inches). You should consult the local agricul-
tural extension service, the county agricultur-
al agent, or other soil professionals for
recommended soil sampling depths for the
specific area in which your land application
unit is located.
Once the samples have been obtained,
they must be prepared for chemical analysis.
This typically is done by having the sample
air dried, ground, and mixed, and then
passed through a 2 millimeter sieve as soon
as possible after collection. If the samples are
to be analyzed for nitrate, ammonia, or
pathogens, then they should be refrigerated
under moist field conditions and analyzed as
soon as possible. For more information on
handling and preparing soil samples, refer to
the "General Protocol for Soil Sample
Handling and Preparation" section in EPAs
Description and Sampling of Contaminated Soils:
A Field Pocket Guide (U.S. EPA,1991). ASTM
method D-4220 Practices for Preserving and
Transporting Soil Samples also addresses prop-
er soil sample handling protocols.
9-31
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
The exact procedure for drying is not criti-
cal as long as contamination is minimized
and excessive temperatures are avoided. The
recommended drying procedure for routine
soil analysis is to dry the samples overnight,
using forced air at ambient temperatures.
Supplemental heating can be used, but it is
recommended that soil samples to be used
for routine analyses not be dried at greater
than 36°C. Microwave drying can alter the
analytical results and should be avoided.
Because soil is defined as having a particle
size of less than 2 millimeters, this sieve size
(#10 mesh) is recommended for routine soil
testing. Commercial soil grinders and crush-
ers, such as mortar and pestles, hammer-
mills, or roller-crushers, are typically long
and motorized. The amount of coarse frag-
ments common in some samples limits the
use of some of these. In general, it is desir-
able to get most of the sample to less than 2
mm with the least amount of grinding. If the
sample is to be analyzed for micronutrients,
all contact with metal surfaces should be
avoided during crushing and sieving unless it
has been clearly demonstrated that the metal
is not a source of contamination. Cross-cont-
amination between samples can be avoided
by minimizing soil-particle carry over on the
crushing and sieving apparatus. For
macronutrient analysis, removal of particles
by brushing or jarring should be adequate. If
micronutrient or trace element analysis is to
be performed, a more thorough cleaning of
the apparatus by brushing or wiping between
samples might be required.
The bulk soil sample should be thorough-
ly homogenized by mixing with a spatula,
stirring rod, or other implement. As much of
the sample as possible should be loosened
and mixed together. No segregation of the
sample by aggregate size should be apparent
after mixing. You should dip into the center
of the mixed sample to obtain a subsample
for analysis.
Prior to sampling, all containers and
equipment that are to be used for soil collec-
tion (i.e., those that will come in contact
with the soil being sampled) should be
rinsed in warm tap water to remove any
residual soil particles from previous sampling
runs. They should then be rinsed with an
aluminum chloride solution. Avoid using
anhydrous aluminum chloride due to its vio-
lent reaction with water. A four percent
hydrogen chloride solution can also be used
if the soil is not to be analyzed for chlorine.
The containers and equipment should be
rinsed twice in distilled or deionized water
and allowed to dry prior to use.
You should obtain professional assistance
from qualified soil scientists and laboratories
to properly interpret the soil-sample results.
For more information about how to obtain
representative soil samples and submit them
for analysis, you can consult various federal
manuals, such as EPAs Laboratory Methods
for Soil and Foliar Analysis in Long-Term
Environmental Monitoring Programs (U.S. EPA,
1995b), or state guides, such as Nebraska's
Guidelines for Soil Sampling (G91-1000-A).
The following ASTM methods might also
prove useful when conducting soil sampling:
D-1452 Practice for Soil Investigation and
Sampling by Auger Borings', D-1586 Test
Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel
Sampling of Soils', D-1587 Practice for Thin-
Walled Tube Sampling of Soils', and D-3550
Practice for Ring-Lined Barrel Sampling of Soils.
IV. Air Monitoring
The development of appropriate air-moni-
toring data can be technically complex and
resource intensive. The Industrial Waste Air
(IWAIR) Model on the CD ROM version of
this Guide provides a simple tool that relies
on waste characterization information, rather
than actual air monitoring data, to evaluate
9-32
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
risks from VOC emissions at a unit. The air-
modeling tool uses an emissions model to
estimate emissions from a waste management
unit based on the waste characterization. You
should review Chapter 5-Protecting Air
Quality, and the supporting background doc-
ument developed for the IWAIR model to
understand the limitations of the model and
determine whether it is applicable to a specif-
ic unit. If the model is not appropriate for a
specific site or if it indicates that there is a
problem with VOC emissions, use an alterna-
tive (emissions) model that is more appropri-
ate for the site or consider air monitoring to
gather more site-specific data.
A. Types of Air Emissions
Monitoring
There are generally four different types of
air emissions monitoring: source, ambient,
fugitive, and indoor. Source, ambient, and
fugitive monitoring can provide data for use
in emission and dispersion modeling. In
addition, the monitoring of meteorological
conditions at sites is generally conducted
whenever source emissions or ambient moni-
toring is performed, as discussed below. As
the vast majority of industrial waste manage-
ment units are located outdoors, indoor air
quality and monitoring issues typically will
not apply. Consequently, this guide does not
address this issue. For more information on
indoor air quality and monitoring visit the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration's (OSHA) Web site at
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
impact the operation of your facility. For
example, many facilities are required to con-
tinuously monitor downwind fenceline emis-
sion of hydrocarbons. If a neighboring facility's
emissions of hydrocarbons or adjacent freeway
hydrocarbon emissions drift across your fence-
line and combine with your own hydrocarbon
emissions, your total facility hydrocarbon
emission limit could be violated.
3. Fugitive Monitoring
Fugitive testing is a hybrid of ambient and
source testing and generally involves the
monitoring of either particulate or gaseous
emissions from sources open to the atmos-
phere. It can involve testing sources such as
valves, flanges, pumps, and similar equipment
and hardware for leaks, and it can include
quantifying emissions from open drums, open
vats, landfills, waste piles, and surface
impoundments such as lagoons, pits, and set-
tling ponds. It is typically conducted using
one or more of the following techniques: use
of a handheld organic analyzer; "bagging" sus-
pect sources for subsequent analysis; captur-
ing and scrubbing fugitive emissions using a
floating flux chamber/summa canister; or
measuring particulate matter greater than or
less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10) fol-
lowing promulgated EPA test methods.
Selection of the test method depends on
factors such as the type of emissions, source
type, temperature, pressure, constituent con-
centration, etc. (test methods are discussed
later in this chapter). For example, a plant
operator who suspects that a valve is leaking
might use a handheld organic analyzer to ver-
ify the presence of a leak. If the analyzer is
not able to quantify the concentration of the
leaking gas, then the bagging technique can
be employed. To determine the amount and
type of organic emissions escaping from a set-
tling pond or wastewater treatment tank, a
floating flux chamber/summa canister might
be preferred. This is a box that isolates a por-
tion of the pond to determine volumetric
flow. The box acts as a floating stack in which
emissions are captured into a canister for
analysis. For material transfer operations or
vehicular traffic from unpaved roads, it is
obviously not practical to use a handheld ana-
lyzer or to "bag" the source (especially some-
thing as large as a waste pile). In such cases of
particulate matter fugitive emissions, a high-
volume ambient PM10 sampling system is
used, or the emissions are ducted through a
temporary stack for direct measurement using
a sampling train (see Figure 6).
4. Meteorological Monitoring
Another form of air monitoring measures
meteorological conditions at a site. Site-spe-
cific meteorological information can be col-
lected for use in air emission and dispersion
modeling. This type of monitoring involves
measurement of wind speed, wind direction,
temperature, etc., and can be performed
when other offsite meteorological informa-
tion might not adequately characterize the
weather conditions at the site. Local wind
systems are usually quite significant in terms
of the transport and dispersion of air con-
stituents. Therefore, local meteorological
monitoring will most likely be important for
mountainous or hilly terrain (where solar
heating and radiational cooling influence
how wind moves) or for a site near a large
body of water (where the differential heating
of land and water can result in thermals and
subsidence over water). Also, the initial
direction of transport of constituents from
their source is determined by the wind
direction at the source.
To make meteorological measurements,
three components are typically needed: a
detector or sensor, an encoder or digitizer,
and a data logger. Most detectors are analog,
providing a continuous output as a function
9-34
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
of varying meteorological conditions. The
output signal must then be sampled to pro-
duce a discrete digital record, using some sort
of encoder or analog-to-digital converter. The
resulting discrete series of data must be
recorded, often on magnetic tape, magnetic
disks, or optical disks. "Instrument system"
or "instrument package" is the name given to
the set of all three components listed above.
Additional components might also be nec-
essary including: an instrument platform, a
means of calibration, and display devices.
Platforms, such as a tower, can often hold
many instrument systems. Calibration against
known standards should be performed peri-
odically during the measuring program, or
should be accomplished continuously as a
function of the sensor or instrument package.
All data must be calibrated. Finally, the mea-
sured values should be displayed on printers,
plotters, or video displays in order to confirm
the proper operation of the instrument.
A large variety of sensors have been devel-
oped to measure various meteorologic para-
meters. Direct sensors are ones that are
placed on an instrument platform to make in
situ measurements of the air at the location of
the sensor. Remote sensors measure waves
that are generated by, or modified by, the
atmosphere at locations distant from the sen-
sor. These waves propagate from the genera-
tion or modification point back to the sensor.
Disadvantages of direct sensors include modi-
fication of the flow by the sensor or its plat-
form and the requirement to physically
position the sensor where the measurement is
to be made. Disadvantages of remote sensors
include their size, cost, and complexity.
Advantages of direct sensors include sensitivi-
ty, accuracy, and simplicity. Advantages of
remote sensors include the fact that they can
quickly scan a large area while remaining sta-
tionary on the ground.
Sensors Used To Measure
Meteorologic Parameters
The following types of sensors can be used to
monitor meteorological conditions at a site (note
that this list is not meant to be exhaustive):
Temperature—thermometers.
Direct sensors: Remote sensors:
wax thermostat microwave sounders
thermistor sodar
bimetallic strip thermistor
thermocouple
liquid (mercury or alcohol) in glass
radiometers
Humidity—hygrometers.
Direct sensors: Remote sensors:
psychrometers lidar
hair hygrometer radar
chilled mirror (dew pointer)
hygristor
Wind—velocity (anemometers) and
direction (vanes).
Direct senors: Remote sensors:
cup Doppler radar
propellar
wind vane
bivane
Pressure—barometers and microbarographs.
Direct sensors:
aneroid elements
capacitive elements
mercury in glass
Remote sensors:
None that use wave propagation directly, but
some that measure temperature and velocity
fluctuations as mentioned above, and infer
pressure perturbations as residual from govern-
ing equations.
Radiation—radiometers.
Radiometers can be designed to measure radia-
tion in specific frequency bands coming from
specific directions: radiometer, net radiometer,
pyranometer, and net pyranometer.
9-35
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
B. Air Monitoring and
Sampling Equipment
1. Ambient Air Monitoring
For ambient air monitoring, the principal
requirement of a sampling system is to obtain
a sample that is representative of the atmos-
phere at a particular place and time. The
major components of most sampling systems
are an inlet manifold, an air mover, a collec-
tion medium, and a flow measurement
device. The inlet manifold transports material
from the ambient atmosphere to the collec-
tion medium, or analytical device, preferably
in an unaltered condition. The inlet opening
can be designed for a specific purpose. All
inlets for ambient sampling must be rain-
proof. Inlet manifolds are made out of glass,
Teflon, stainless steel, or other inert materials
and permit the remaining components of the
system to be located at a distance from the
sample manifold inlet. The air mover (i.e.,
pump) provides the force to create a vacuum
or lower pressure at the end of the sampling
system. The collection medium for a sam-
pling system can be a liquid or solid sorbent
for dissolving gases, a filter surface for col-
lecting particles, or a chamber to contain an
aliquot of air for analysis. The flow device
measures the volume of air associated with
the sampling system. Examples of flow
devices include mass flow meters and
rotameters.
Gaseous Constituents
Sampling systems for gaseous constituents
can take several forms and might not neces-
sarily have all four components as shown in
Figure 5. The sampling manifold's only func-
tion is to transport the gas from the manifold
inlet to the collection medium. The manifold
must be made of nonreactive material and no
condensation should be allowed to occur in
the sampling manifold. The volume of the
manifold and the sampling flow rate deter-
mine the time required for the gas to move
from the inlet to the collection medium. This
residence time can be minimized to decrease
the loss of reactive species in the manifold by
keeping the manifold as short as possible.
The collection medium for gases can be
liquid or solid sorbents, and evacuated flask,
Figure 5. Schematic Diagram of Various Types of Sampling Systems
Source: Fundamentals of Air Pollution.
9-36
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
or a cryogenic trap. Each design is an attempt
to optimize gas flow rate and collection effi-
ciency. Higher flow rates permit shorter sam-
pling times. Liquid collection systems take
the form of bubblers which are designed to
maximize the gas-liquid interface. However,
excessive flow rates can result in lower collec-
tion efficiency.
Diagram A is typical of many extractive
sampling techniques (e.g., SO2 in liquid sor-
bents and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
on solid sorbents). Diagram B is used for
"open-face" filter collection, in which the fil-
ter is directly exposed to the atmosphere
being sampled. Diagram C is an evacuated
container used to collect an aliquot of air or
gas to be transported to the laboratory for
chemical analysis, (e.g., polished stainless
steel canisters are used to collect ambient
hydrocarbons for air toxic analysis). Diagram
D is the basis for many of the automated con-
tinuous analyzers, which combine the sam-
pling and analytical processes in one piece of
equipment (e.g., continuous ambient air
monitors for SO2, O3, and NOx).
Particulate Constituents
Sampling for particulate constituents in the
atmosphere involves a different set of parame-
ters from those used for gases. Particles are
inherently larger than the molecules of N2 and
O2 in the surrounding air and behave differ-
ently with increasing diameter. When sam-
pling for particulate matter in the atmosphere,
three pieces of information are of particular
interest: the concentration, the size, and the
chemical composition of the particles. Particle
size is important in determining adverse
effects and atmospheric removal processes.
The primary approach is to separate the
particles from a known volume of air and
subject them to weight determination and
chemical analysis. The principle methods for
extracting particles from an airstream are fil-
tration and impaction.7 All sampling tech-
niques must be concerned with the behavior
of particles in a moving airstream. Care must
be taken to move the particles through the
manifold to the collection medium in an
unaltered form. Potential problems arise if
manifold systems are too long or too twisted.
Gravitational settling in the manifold will
remove a fraction of the very large particles.
Larger particles are also subject to loss by
impaction on walls at bends in a manifold.
Particles can also be subject to electrostatic
forces which will cause them to migrate to
the walls of nonconducting manifolds. Other
potential problems include condensation or
agglomeration during transit time in the man-
ifold. These constraints require particulate
sampling manifolds to be as short as possible
and to have as few bends as possible.
2. Source Emissions Monitoring
For source emissions monitoring, the sam-
pling system is tailored to the unique proper-
ties of the emissions from a particular
process. It is necessary to take into account
the specific process, the nature of the control
devices, the peculiarities of the source, and
the use of the data obtained. In source moni-
toring, the sample is obtained from a stack
that is discharging to the atmosphere using a
"sampling train". A typical sample train is
shown in Figure 6. The figure shows the min-
imum number of components, but in some
systems the components can be combined.
Extreme care must be exercised to assure that
no leaks occur in the train and that the com-
ponents of the train are identical for both cal-
ibration and sampling. Standard sampling
trains are specified for some tests.
Continuous emission monitors (CEMs) are
also available to monitor opacity and certain
gaseous emissions.
Filtration consists of collecting particles on a filter surface by three processes: direct interception, iner-
tial impaction, and diffusion. Filtration attempts to remove a very high percentage of the mass and
number of particles by these processes. Any size classification is done by a preclassifier, such as an
impactor, before the particle stream reaches the surface of the filter
9-37
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Figure 6. Sampling Train
Probe
Source: Fundamentals of Air Pollution.
C. Test Method Selection
Correct method selection is both scientific
and subjective. Knowing when to utilize the
appropriate method for a given circumstance
is very important, since incorrect or inaccu-
rate measurement can lead to incorrect
results. The test methods to be used for air
emission monitoring are typically specified
by applicable regulations; and the type of
facility will often determine the regulations or
standards which are applicable. In general,
most EPA test methods applicable to a facility
will be contained in the Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR Parts 60, 61, 63, and
51). Other test methods might be specified
by the EPA Office of Solid Waste or the
National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (primarily for indoor air monitor-
ing). Additionally, some states and local air
pollution control agencies have their own test
methods that differ from EPA methods, the
use of which might be required in lieu of
EPA methods. The CFR specifies test meth-
ods for testing for numerous compounds and
various parameters necessary for determining
constituent concentrations and emission
rates. New regulations, however, are being
developed for many compounds that, as yet,
have no promulgated test methods. Air emis-
sion testing specialists or consultants can
often determine appropriate test methods for
most of these compounds. Usually, the test-
ing involves adapting an existing method to
the constituent of interest. It is best to use an
existing method whenever possible. If using
an existing method is impractical, you can
develop a test method particular to that con-
stituent to monitor for it. You should seek
the advice or assistance of a professional if
this is the case and consult your state and
local air quality offices.
D. Sampling Site Selection
Sampling activities are typically undertaken
to determine the ambient air quality for com-
pliance with air quality standards, to evaluate
the effectiveness of air pollution control tech-
niques being implemented at the site, to eval-
uate hazards associated with accidental spills,
and to collect data for air emissions and dis-
persion modeling. The purpose or use of the
results of the monitoring program determines
the sampling site selection. The fundamental
reason for controlling air pollution sources is
to limit the concentration of contaminants in
9-38
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
the atmosphere so that adverse effects do not
occur. Sampling sites should therefore be
selected to measure constituent levels close to
or representative of exposed populations of
people, plants, trees, materials, or structures.
As a result, ambient air monitoring sites are
typically located near ground level, about 3
EPA Test Methods
EPA test methods are available for a
variety of compounds and parameters,
including but not limited to the follow-
ing examples:
• Particulate Matter
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
• Sulfur Dioxide
• Nitrogen Oxide
• Visible Emissions
• Carbon Monoxide
• Hydrogen Sulfide
• Inorganic Lead
• Total Fluoride
• Landfill Gas (gas production flow
rate)
• Nonmethane Organic Compounds
(NMOC) (in landfill gases)
• Hydrogen Chloride
• Gaseous Organic Compounds
• Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins
and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans
• Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric
Flow Rate
• Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide,
Excess Air, and Dry Molecular Weight
• Moisture Content in Stack Gases
meters above ground (Boubel, p. 192.), in a
place where the results are not influenced by a
nearby source such as a roadway. Sampling
sites might require electrical power and ade-
quate protection (which can be as simple as a
fence). A shelter, such as a small building,
might be necessary. Permanent sampling sites
(when necessary) will require adequate heat-
ing and air conditioning to provide a stable
environment for the sampling and monitoring
equipment.
V. Sampling and
Analytical
Protocols and
Quality
Assurance and
Quality Control
The best designed monitoring program
will not provide useful data in the absence of
sound sampling and analytical protocols.
Sampling and analytical protocols are gener-
ally contaminant specific. A correctly
designed and implemented sampling and
analysis protocol helps ensure that sampling
results accurately represent media quality and
can be compared over time. The accurate
representation is demonstrated through statis-
tical analysis.
Whether or not an established quality
assurance and quality control (QA/QC) pro-
gram is required on a federal, state, or local
level, it is a good management practice to
develop and strictly implement such a plan.
The sampling protocol should incorporate
federal, state, and local QA/QC requirements.
Sampling QA/QC procedures detail steps for
collection and handling of samples. Sample
collection, preservation, shipment, storage,
9-39
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
and analysis should be performed in accor-
dance with an approved QA/QC program to
ensure data of known quality are generated.
You should rely on qualified professionals
who are properly trained to conduct sam-
pling. Poorly-conducted sampling can give
false evidence of a contamination problem or
can miss early warnings of contaminant
leaching. Erring in either direction is an
avoidable and costly mistake.
At a minimum, you should include the
following in your sampling protocol:
• Data quality objectives including lists
of important tracking parameters,
such as the date and name of sam-
ples.
• Sample collection procedures,
including description of sample col-
lection methods, and lists of neces-
sary field analyses.
• Instructions for sample preservation
and handling.
• Other QA/QC procedures such as
chain-of-custody
• The name of the person who con-
ducted the sampling.
Quality control operations are defined by
operational procedures and might contain the
following components for an air monitoring
program:
• Description of the methods used for
sampling and analysis.
• Sampling manifold and instrument
configuration.
• Appropriate multipoint calibration
procedures.
• Zero/span checks and record of
adjustments.
• Control specification checks and
their frequency.
• Control limits for zero, span, and
other control limits.
• The corrective actions to be taken
when control limits are exceeded.
• Preventative maintenance.
• Recording and validation of data.
• Documentation of quality assurance
activities.
States have developed guidance docu-
ments addressing sampling plans, protocols,
and reports. You should work with the state
to develop an effective sampling protocol.
• You should consult with soil special-
ists at the state and local environ-
mental/planning offices, your local
cooperative extension service office,
or the county conservation district
office before implementing a soil
monitoring program for your unit.
(For more information, visit the
USDA Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service
Web site at: ).
These agencies likely will be able to
provide you with maps showing the
location and extent of soils, data
about the physical and chemical
properties of soils, and information
derived from the soil data about
9-40
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
potentialities and problems of use for
the soils in your area. You can also
consult the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Web
site at .
The NRCS manages the national
cooperative soil survey program
which is a partnership of federal land
management agencies, state agricul-
tural experiment stations, and state
and local agencies that provide soil
survey information necessary for
understanding, managing, conserv-
ing, and sustaining soil resources.
The NRCS maintains various on-line
databases that can help you to char-
acterize local soil.
You should consult with air modeling
professionals, state and local air qual-
ity offices, EPA Regional air program
offices, or EPA's Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS) in
Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina, before implementing an air
monitoring program for your unit or
choosing alternative emission and
dispersion models to evaluate risks
associated with air emissions. For
information concerning emission test
methods, you can contact the
Emission Measurement Center (EMC)
within the Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. The EMC is
EPA's point of contact for providing
expert technical assistance for EPA,
state, and local officials and industrial
representatives involved in emission
testing. The Center has produced
numerous methods of measuring air
constituents emitted from a multitude
of industries. A 24-hour automated
telephone information hotline known
as the "SOURCE" at 919 541-0200,
provides callers with a variety of
technical emission testing informa-
tion. The SOURCE also includes con-
nections to technical material
through an automatic facsimile link
and with technical staff during work-
ing hours. For more information con-
cerning the EMC, visit EPA's Web site
at: is a source
of information on various atmospher-
ic dispersion (air quality) models that
support regulatory programs required
by the Clean Air Act. The computer
code, data, and technical documents
provided by SCRAM deal with math-
ematical modeling for the dispersion
of air constituents. Documentation
and guidance for these computerized
models are a major feature of the
Web site.
A. Data Quality Objectives
In any sampling and analysis plan, it is
important to understand the data needs for a
monitoring program. Tailoring sampling proto-
col and analytical work to data needs ensures
cost-efficient sampling. A sampling and analy-
sis plan should specify: 1) clear objective, such
as what data are needed and how the data are
to be used, 2) target contaminants, and 3)
level of accuracy requirements for data to be
conclusive. Chapter 1 of EPA SW-846 Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (U.S. EPA,
1986) and ASTM Guide D5792 provide guid-
ance on developing data quality objectives for
waste management activities.
B. Sample Collection
Sample collection techniques should be
carefully designed to ensure sampling quality
and avoid cross-contamination or background
9-41
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
contamination of samples. (As an example of
some of the sample collection guidance avail-
able, Section A.4 of the Annual Book ofASTM
Standards lists guides for ground-water sam-
pling.) You should consider the following fac-
tors when preparing for sample collection.
• Sample collection. The equipment
used to collect samples should be
appropriate for the monitoring para-
meters. Sampling equipment should
cause minimal agitation of the sam-
ple and reduce or eliminate contact
between the sample and environmen-
tal contaminants during transfer to
ensure it is representative.
• Field analysis. Some constituents or
parameters can be physically or chem-
ically unstable and should be tested in
the field rather than waiting for ship-
ment to a laboratory. Examples of
unstable parameters include pH,
redox (oxidation-reduction) potential,
dissolved oxygen, temperature, and
specific conductance.
C. Sample Preservation
and Handling
Sample preservation and handling proto-
cols are designed to minimize alterations of
the chemistry of samples between the time
the sample is collected and when it is ana-
lyzed. You should consider the following.
• Sample containers. To avoid altering
sample quality, transfer samples from
the sampling equipment directly into
a contaminant free container. SW-
846, identifies proper sample con-
tainers for different constituents and
media. Samples should not be com-
bined in a common sample container
and then split later in the field.
• Sample preservation. The time
between sampling and sample analy-
sis can range from several hours to
several weeks. Immediate sample
preservation and storage assists in
maintaining the natural chemistry of
the samples. The latest edition of
SW-846 provides specific preserva-
tion methods and holding times for
each constituent analyzed. SW- 846
recommends preservation methods,
such as pH adjustment, chemical
addition, and refrigeration.
• Sample transport. To document
sample possession from the time of
collection to the laboratory, include a
chain-of-custody record in every sam-
ple shipment. A chain-of- custody
record generally includes the date
and time of collection, signatures of
those involved in the chain of posses-
sion, time and dates of possession,
and other notations to trace samples.
D. Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
To verify the accuracy of field sampling
procedures, you should collect field quality
control samples, such as trip blanks, field
blank, equipment blanks, spilt samples,
blinds, and duplicates. Table 5 below sum-
marizes these common types of QA/QC sam-
ples. Analyze quality control samples for the
required monitoring parameters. Other
QA/QC practices include sampling equip-
ment calibration, equipment decontamina-
tion, and use of chain-of-custody forms.
ASTM Guide D-5283 Standard Practice for
Generation of Environmental Data Related to
Waste Management Activities: Quality Assurance
and Quality Control Planning and
Implementation provides guidance on QA/QC
9-42
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 5 Types of QA/QC Samples
Type of Sample
Trip Blank
Used for volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs) only. Trip blanks
are prepared at the analyzing labo-
ratory and transported to the field
with the empty vials to be used in
the VOC field sampling. They con-
sist of a sealed vial filled with ana-
lyte-free water (i.e., de-ionized
water). The water should be the
same as the water the laboratory
will use in analyzing the actual
samples collected in the field, and
include any preservatives or addi-
tives that will be used. They are
handled, stored, and transported
in the exact same manner as the
field samples. Trip blanks should
never be opened in the field.
Purpose
Trip blanks provide a quality assur-
ance test for detecting contamination
from improper sample container
(vial) cleaning prior to shipping to
the field, the use of contaminated
water in analyzing the samples in
the laboratory, VOC contamination
occurring during sample storage or
transport, and any other environ-
mental conditions that could result
in VOC contamination of samples
during the sampling event.
Frequency
One trip blank for each cooler
used during a sampling episode
should be prepared for each
volatile organic method to be used
in the field. For example, if 2
volatile organic methods are to be
used over 2 days with samples
being sent to the lab at the end of
each day, then a total of 4 trip
blanks would be needed (i.e., Day
1: 1 cooler with samples from 2
methods = 2 trip blanks; Day 2: 1
cooler with samples from 2
methods = 2 trip blanks; total trip
blanks = 4).
Field Blank
A sample collected in the field by
filling a vial with analyte-free water
and all preservatives or additives
that will be added to actual sam-
ples. Field blanks should be pre-
pared under the exact same
conditions in the same location as
actual samples either in the middle
or at the end of each sampling
episode. They also should be han-
dled, stored, and transported in
the exact same manner as the actu-
al samples.
Field blanks are used to evaluate the
effects of onsite environmental conta-
minants, the purity of the preserva-
tives and additives used, and general
sample collecting and container filling.
One field blank should be
prepared for each parameter being
sampled and analyzed per day, or
at a rate of 5 percent of the
samples in a parameter group per
day, whichever is larger. For
example if 3 parameter groups
were to be sampled over 2 days
then 6 field blanks would be
required (i.e., 3 parameter groups
x 2 days = 6 field blanks).
Equipment Blank
A sample prepared by pouring
analyte-free water through or over
a decontaminated piece of sam-
pling equipment. The blank
should be prepared on site.
Equipment blanks should be han-
dled, stored, and transported in
the exact same manner as the actu-
al samples.
Equipment blanks are used to deter-
mine the effectiveness of the field
cleaning of sampling equipment.
Generally, they are necessary when
sampling equipment must be
cleaned in the field and reused for
subsequent sampling.
At least one equipment blank
should be prepared for each piece
of equipment used in sampling
that must be field cleaned. Each
time an equipment blank is
required, a sample should be
prepared for each parameter group
being assessed. For example, if
samples are taken for 3 parameter
groups, and a piece of sampling
equipment requires cleaning then a
total of 3 equipment blanks will be
required for each required cleaning
(i.e., 1 piece of equipment x 3
parameter groups = 3 equipment
blanks per cleaning).
9-43
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Table 5 Types of QA/QC Samples (cont.)
Type of Sample
Split (Replicate) Sample
A sample that is divided into 2 or
more containers and sent for
analysis by separate laboratories.
Purpose
Split samples are used to assess sam-
pling and analytical techniques.
Samples can be divided into por-
tions (split) at different points in the
sampling and analysis process to
assess the precision of various com-
ponents of the sampling and analysis
system. For example, a sample split
in the field (field replicate) is used to
assess sample storage, shipment,
preparation, analysis, and data
reduction. A sample split just prior
to laboratory analysis (analysis repli-
cate) is used to assess the precision
of analytical instrumentation.
Frequency
(No guidance on frequency
provided)
Duplicates
Samples collected simultaneously
from the same source under identi-
cal conditions (e.g., same type of
sampling techniques and equip-
ment).
Duplicate samples are used to assess
the precision of sampling techniques
and laboratory equipment.
(No guidance on frequency
provided)
Blinds
A sample prepared prior to a sam-
pling episode by the laboratory or
an independent source. The blind
contains a specific amount of ana-
lyte known by the preparer, but
that is unknown to the analyst at
the time of analysis.
Blinds are used to validate the accu-
racy and precision of the analyzing
laboratories sample analyses.
(No guidance on frequency
provided)
planning and implementation for waste man-
agement activities. Chapter I of SW-846 also
provides guidance on QA/QC practices.
E. Analytical Protocols
Monitoring programs should employ ana-
lytical methods that accurately measure the
constituents being monitored. SW-846 rec-
ommends specific analytical methods to test
for various constituents. Similarly individual
states might recommend other analytical
methods for analysis.
Ensure the reliability and validity of analyt-
ical laboratory data as part of the monitoring
program. Most facility managers use commer-
cial laboratories to conduct analyses of sam-
ples; others might use their own internal
laboratories if they are equipped and qualified
to perform such analyses. In selecting an ana-
lytical laboratory check for the following: lab-
oratory certification by a state or professional
association for the type of analyses needed;
qualified lab personnel; good quality analyti-
cal equipment with back-up instrumentation;
a laboratory QA/QC program; proper lab doc-
umentation; and adherence to standard proce-
dures for data handling, reporting, and record
keeping. Laboratory QA/QC programs should
describe chain-of-custody procedures, calibra-
tion procedures and frequency, analytical
9-44
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
standard operating procedures, and data vali-
dation and reporting procedures. A good
QA/QC program helps ensure the accuracy of
laboratory data.
VI. Analysis of
Monitoring Data,
Contingency
Planning, and
Assessment
Monitoring
Once monitoring data have been collected,
the data are analyzed to determine whether
contaminants are migrating from a waste man-
agement unit. You should develop a contin-
gency plan to address the situations where
contamination is detected.
A. Statistical Approaches
Statistical procedures should be used to
evaluate monitoring data and determine if
there is evidence of a release from a waste
management unit. Anomalous data can result
from sampling uncertainty, laboratory error, or
seasonal changes in natural site conditions.
Qualified statistical professionals can deter-
mine if statistically significant changes have
occurred or whether the quantified differences
could have arisen solely because of one of the
above-listed factors. Selecting the appropriate
statistical method is very important to avoid
generating false positive or false negatives. In
monitoring groundwater, for example, the
selection of the appropriate statistical method
will be contingent upon an adequate review
and evaluation of the background groundwa-
ter data. These data should be evaluated for
properties such as independence, trends,
detection frequency and distribution (e.g.,
normal or lognormal). Examples of two statis-
tical approaches include inter-well (upgradient
vs. downgradient) or intra-well comparisons.
After consulting with the state agency and sta-
tistical professional and selecting a statistical
approach, continue to use the selected
method in all statistical analyses. Do not
switch to a different test when the first
method generates unfavorable results.
What is important in selecting a
statistical approach?
An appropriate statistical approach will
minimize false positives or negatives in terms
of potential releases. The approach should
account for historical data, site conditions,
site operating practices, and seasonal varia-
tions. While there are numerous statistical
approaches used to evaluate monitoring data,
check with the state to determine if a specific
statistical approach is recommended.
Common methods for evaluating monitoring
data include the following statistical approaches:
• Tolerance intervals. Tolerance inter-
vals are statistical intervals construct-
ed from data designed to contain a
portion of a population, such as 95
percent of all sample measurements.
• Prediction intervals. These intervals
approximate future sample values
from a population or distribution
with a specific probability. Prediction
9-45
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
intervals can be used both for com-
parison of current monitoring data to
previous data for the same site.
• Control charts. These charts use his-
torical data for comparison purposes
and are, therefore, only appropriate
for initially uncontaminated sites.
There are many different ways to select an
appropriate statistical method. For more
detailed guidance on statistical methods for
ground-water contaminant detection moni-
toring, consult Addendum to Interim Final
Guidance Document on Statistical Analysis of
Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA
Facilities (U.S. EPA, 1993); Guidance
Document on Statistical Analysis of Ground-
Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities-
Interim Final Guidance (U.S. EPA, 1989); and
ASTM provisional guide PS 64- 96 in the
Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
B. Contingency Planning
Contingency plans identify the procedures
to follow if a statistically significant change in
one or more constituents has been detected.
A contingency plan should include proce-
dures to determine whether a change in sam-
ple concentrations was caused by the waste
management unit or by unrelated factors;
procedures for developing and conducting an
assessment monitoring program; procedures
for remediating the waste management unit
to stop the release of contaminants; and a
determination of the magnitude of contami-
nation that would require initiation of correc-
tive action, such as a statistical exceedance of
an HBN, an MCL for surface or ground
water, or a site-specific risk-based number.
C. Assessment Monitoring
The purpose of assessment monitoring is
to evaluate the rate, extent, and concentra-
tions of contamination. Once a statistically
significant change has been confirmed for
one or more of the sampling parameters, you
should determine whether the change was
caused by factors unrelated to the unit.
Factors unrelated to the unit that might cause
a change in the detected concentration(s) are:
• Contaminant sources other than the
waste management unit being moni-
tored.
• Natural variations in the quality of
the media being monitored.
• Analytical errors.
• Statistical errors.
• Sampling errors.
If the change was caused by a factor unre-
lated to the unit, then additional measures
might not be necessary and the original mon-
itoring program can be resumed. If, however,
these factors have been ruled out, you should
begin an assessment monitoring program.
You should consult with the state agency to
determine the type of assessment monitoring
to conduct at the unit. Assessment monitor-
ing typically involves resampling at all sites,
and analyzing the samples for a larger list of
parameters than used during the basic moni-
toring program. More than one sampling
event might be necessary and additional
monitoring might need to be performed to
adequately determine the scope or extent of
any contamination. It is recommended that
you work with state officials to establish
background concentrations and protection
standards for all additional constituents that
were detected during assessment monitoring.
If assessment monitoring results indicate
there is not a statistically significant change
in the concentrations of one or more of the
constituents over the established protection
standards, then you can resume the original
monitoring program. If, however, there is a
9-46
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
statistically significant change in any of these
constituents, consult with state officials to
identify the next steps. It might be necessary
to perform additional monitoring to charac-
terize the nature and extent of the contamina-
tion and to notify persons who own or reside
on any land directly impacted by the contam-
ination if it has migrated beyond the facility
boundary.
Detection of contamination can be an indi-
cator that the waste management unit's con-
tainment system is not working properly.
During this assessment phase, component(s)
of the unit (cover, liner, or leachate collection
system) that are not working properly should
be identified and, if possible, remediated. For
example, sometimes sealing a hole in the
liner of a small surface impoundment can be
sufficient to stop the source of contamination.
Other times, more extensive response might
be required. One example could be the
extensive subsidence of a unit's final cover
creating the need for repair. In some cases,
liner and leachate collection system repairs
might not be possible, such as in a large sur-
face impoundment or a landfill with several
tons of waste already in place. If remediation
is not possible, consult with state officials
about beginning assessment monitoring and
consult Chapter 10-Taking Corrective Action.
9-47
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Monitoring Performance Activity List
You should consider the following for each media when developing a monitoring program for industrial
waste management units:
Ground Water
Q Perform a site characterization, including investigation of the site's geology, hydrology, and subsur-
face hydrogeology to determine areas for ground-water monitoring; select parameters to be moni-
tored based on the characteristics of the waste managed.
Q Identify qualified engineers and ground-water specialists to assist in designing and operating the
ground-water monitoring program.
Q Consult with qualified professionals to identify necessary program components including the mon-
itoring well design, the number of monitoring wells, the lateral and vertical placement of the wells,
the duration and frequency of monitoring, and the appropriate sampling parameters.
Q Determine the appropriate method(s) of ground-water monitoring, including conventional well
monitoring, direct push sampling, geophysical monitoring, and vadose zone monitoring as possi-
bilities.
Q Use qualified laboratories to analyze samples.
Surface Water
Q Collect and analyze samples according to the requirements of a site's federal or state storm-water
permit.
Q If not subject to permit requirements, implement a storm-water sampling program to monitor the
quality of runoff and determine the effectiveness of BMPs.
Q If applicable, collect and analyze discharges to POTWs according to any requirements of a local
pretreatment program.
Q Implement a surface-water sampling program to monitor water quality and determine the effec-
tiveness of BMPs.
Q Perform regular inspections and maintenance of surface-water protection measures and BMPs to
reduce the potential for surface-water contamination.
Q Use qualified laboratories to analyze samples.
Soil Monitoring
Q Determine the number and location of samples needed to adequately characterize soil according to
the variability of the soil at a site.
Q Follow established soil-sampling procedures to obtain meaningful results.
Q Use qualified laboratories to analyze samples.
9-48
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
— Monitoring Performance Activity List (cont.) —
Q Determine baseline soil conditions by sampling prior to waste application.
Q Collect and analyze samples at regular intervals to detect contaminant problems.
Air Monitoring
Q Use the Industrial Waste Air (IWAIR) Model to evaluate risks from VOC emissions.
Q Use an alternative emissions model if the IWAIR Model indicates a problem with VOC emission or
is not appropriate for your site.
Q If collecting air monitoring data, determine the type of monitoring necessary to evaluate the effec-
tiveness of air pollution control techniques employed on site or for input into air emissions and
dispersion models.
Q Select the proper test methods.
Q Establish guidelines to ensure the quality of the data collected prior to implementing an air moni-
toring program.
Q Consult with air modeling professionals, state and local air quality offices, EPA regional air pro-
gram offices, or EPAs Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards before implementing an air
monitoring program or choosing an alternative emission model to evaluate risks.
Q Use qualified laboratories to analyze samples.
Sampling and Analytical Protocols QA/QC
Q Develop sample collection, preservation, storage, transport, and handling protocols tailored to data
needs, and establish quality assurance and quality control procedures to check the accuracy of the
monitoring samples.
Q Eliminate cross-contamination or background contamination of any samples by purging the wells,
using appropriate sampling equipment, and ensuring that any unstable parameters, such as pH,
dissolved oxygen, and temperature, have been tested at the site.
Q Identify the appropriate analytical methods and statistical approach for the sampling data includ-
ing parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA), tolerance intervals, prediction intervals, and control
charts as possibilities.
Q Evaluate the need for assessment monitoring and abatement.
9-49
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources
Site Characterization
American Society for Testing and Materials. 2001. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM.
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1994. ASTM Standards on Ground Water and Vadose Zone
Investigations, 2nd Edition. ASTM.
ASTM D-1452. 1980. Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings.
ASTM D-1586. 1984. Test Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils
ASTM D-1587. 1983. Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils.
ASTM D-3550. 1988. Practice for Ring-Lined Barrel Sampling of Soils..
ASTM D-4220. 1989. Practices for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples.
ASTM D-5792. 1995. Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management
Activities: Development of Data Quality Objectives.
Boulding, J.R. 1995. Practical Handbook of Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground Water Contamination:
Assessment, Prevention and Remediation. Lewis Publishers.
CCME. 1994. Subsurface Assessment Handbook for Contaminated Sites, CCME EPC-NCSRP-48E, Canadian
Council of Ministers of the Environment.
Morrison, R.D. 1983. Groundwater Monitoring Technology. Timco Mfg. Inc.
Sara, M.N. 1994. Standard Handbook for Solid and Hazardous Waste Facility Assessments. Lewis Publishers.
Topp, G.C. and J.L. Davis. 1985. "Measurement of Soil Water Using Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR): A
Field Evaluation," Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49:19-24.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring Techniques: A Desk Reference Guide. Volume I:
Solids and Ground Water, Appendices A and B. EPA625-R-93-003a.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring Techniques: A Desk Reference Guide. Volume II:
The Vadose Zone, Field Screening and Analytical Methods, Appendices C and D. EPA625- R-93-003b.
9-50
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1988. Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Draft background Document. EPA530- SW-
88-042.
U.S. EPA. 1987. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using
Hydrogeologic Settings. EPA600-2-87-035.
Wilson, L.G., L.G. Everett, and SJ. Cullen (eds.). 1995. Handbook of Vadose Zone Characterization and
Monitoring. Lewis Publishers.
Ground-Water Monitoring Well Design, Installation, and Development
Cullen, SJ. 1995. Vadose Zone Monitoring: Experiences and Trends in the United States. Ground Water
Monitoring Review 15(3):136-143.
Cullen, S.J., J.K. Kramer, and J.R. Luellen. 1995. A Systematic Approach to Designing a Multiphase
Unsaturated Zone Monitoring Network. Ground Water Monitoring Review 15(3):124-135.
Geoprobe Systems. 1996. Geoprobe Prepacked Screen Monitoring Well: Standard Operating Procedure.
Technical Bulletin No. 96-2000.
Hayes, J.P and D.C. Tight. 1995. Applying Electrical Resistance Blocks for Unsaturated Zone Monitoring at
Arid Sites. Handbook of Vadose Zone Characterization and Monitoring. L.G. Wilson, L.G. Everett, and SJ.
Cullen (eds.). Lewis Publishers, pp. 387-399.
Kramer, J.H., SJ. Cullen, and L.G. Everett. 1992. Vadose Zone Monitoring with the Neutron Moisture
Probe. Ground Water Monitoring Review 12(3): 177-187.
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. Technical Guidance Manual for Hydrogeologic
Investigations and Ground Water Monitoring.
Robbins, G.A. and M.M. Gemmell. 1985. Factors Requiring Resolution in Installing Vadose Zone
Monitoring Systems. Ground Water Monitoring Review 5:76-80.
U.S. EPA. 1993a. Ground-Water Monitoring: Draft Technical Guidance. EPA530-R-93-001.
U.S. EPA. 1993b. Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual. Chapter 5. EPA530-R-93- 017.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Handbook: Ground Water. Volume II: Methodology. EPA625-6-90-016b.
9-51
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1990. Handbook: Ground Water. Volume I: Ground Water and Contamination.
EPA625-6-90- 016a.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Handbook of Suggested Practices for the Design and Installation of Ground-
Water Monitoring Wells. EPA600-4-89-034.
Sample Procedures
ASTM. D-5283. 1997. Standard Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste
Management Activities: Quality Assurance and Quality Control Planning and Implementation.
Benson, R.C., R.A. Glaccum, and M.R. Noel. 1984. Geophysical Techniques for Sensing Buried
Wastes and Waste Migration. EPA600-7-84-064.
Bond, WR. 1995. Case Studies of Vadose Zone Monitoring and Sampling Using Porous Suction
Cup Samplers. Handbook of Vadose Zone Characterization and Monitoring. L.G. Wilson, L.G.
Everett, and SJ. Cullen (eds.). Lewis Publishers, pp. 523-532.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. 2001. Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies
Matrix. Version 1.0.
Gibbons, R.D. 1990. Estimating the Precision of Ground-Water Elevation Data. Ground Water,
28, 357- 360.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 1995. Ground Water Sampling Guidance: Development of
Sampling Plans, Protocols and Reports.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. 1994. TNRCC Technical Guidance:
Guidelines for Preparing a Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis Plan (GWSAP).
Thomson, K.A. 1995. Case Studies of Soil Gas Sampling. Handbook of Vadose Zone
Characterization and Monitoring. L.G. Wilson, L.G. Everett, and SJ. Cullen (eds.). Lewis
Publishers, pp. 569-588.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Ground Water Sampling—A Workshop Summary. EPA600-R-94-205.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Laboratory Methods for Soil and Foliar Analysis in Long-term Environmental
Monitoring Program. EPA600-R-95-077
9-52
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1995c. Low Flow Ground-Water Sampling. EPA540-S-95-504.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Industrial User Inspection and Sampling Manual for POTWs.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Region VIII Guidance, Standard Operating Procedures for Field Sampling Activities.
U.S. EPA. 1992. NPDES Storm Water Sampling Guidance Document. EPA833-B-92-001.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Description and Sampling of Contaminated Soils: A Field Pocket Guide. EPA625-12-
91-002
U.S. EPA. 1989. Interim Final RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Guidance: Volumes I-III. EPA530- SW-
89-031.
U.S. EPA. 1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste—Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA SW-846,
3rd edition. PB88-239-233.
Surface Water Monitoring
Novotny V, and H. Olem. 1994. Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse
Pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
U.S. EPA. 1999. Introduction to the National Pretreatment Program. EPA833-B-98-002.
U.S. EPA. 1997. Volunteer Stream Monitoring Document. EPA841-B-97-003.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Volunteer Lake Monitoring Document. EPA440-4-91-002.
Soil Monitoring
Delaware Cooperative Extension Service. 1995. Recommended Soil Testing Procedures for the
Northeastern United States. 2nd Edition. Northeastern Regional Publication No. 493.
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 1994. Soil facts: Careful Soil Sampling - The Key to
Reliable Soil Test Information. AG-439-30.
Rowell, D.L. 1994. Soil Science: Methods and Applications.
Soil Quality Institute of the National Resources Conservation Service, USDA. 2001. Guidelines for Soil
Quality Assessment in Conservation Planning.
9-53
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 1991.
Guidelines for Soil Sampling. G91-1000-A. February.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. Laboratory Methods for Soil and Foliar Analysis in Long-Term Environmental
Monitoring Programs. EPA600-R-95-077.
U.S. EPA. 1989. RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance: Volume II: Soil, Ground Water and Subsurface
Gas Releases. EPA530-SW-89-031
Air Monitoring
Boubel, R. W, D. L. Fox, D. B. Turner, and A. C. Stern. 1994. Fundamentals of Air Pollution. 3rd
Edition. Academic Press.
Stull, Roland B. 1988. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Yoest, H. and R. W Fitzgerald. February 1996. Chemical Engineering Progress. Stationary Source
Testing: The Fundamentals.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series: Compilation of Information
on Real-time Air Monitoring for Use at Superfund Sites. EPA451-R-93-008.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series: Volume 4: Guidance for
Ambient Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites, Revised. EPA451-R-93-007.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2). EPA450-4-90-005.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series: Contingency Plans at
Superfund Sites Using Air Monitoring. EPA450-1-90-005.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series, Volume 4: Procedures for
Dispersion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Superfund Air Pathway Analysis, Interim Report, Final.
EPA450-1-89-004.
U.S. EPA. 1986. Test methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. 3rd Edition. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. SW-846.
Statistical References
Davis, C.B. and McNichols, RJ. 1987. One-Sided Intervals for at Least p of m Observations from a
Normal Population on Each of r Future Occasions. Technometries, 29, 359-370.
9-54
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
Gibbons, R.D. 1994. Statistical Methods for Ground-Water Monitoring. John Wiley & Sons.
Gibbons, R.D. 1992. An Overview ol Statistical Methods for Ground-Water Detection Monitoring at
Waste Disposal Facilities. In Ground-Water Contamination at Hazardous Waste Sites: Chemical Analysis.
S. Lesge and R.E. Jackson (eds.), New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Gibbons, R.D., Dolan, D., Keough, H., O'Leary K., and O'Hara, R. 1992. A Comparison ol Chemical
Constituents in Leachate from Industrial Hazardous Waste and Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
Proceedings olthe Fifteenth Annual Madison Waste Conference, University ol Wisconsin, Madison.
Gibbons, R.D., Gams, N.E., Jarke, F.H., and Stoub, K.P. 1992. Practical Quantitation Limits.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 12, 225-235.
Gibbons, R.D. 1991. Some Additional Nonparametric Prediction Limits for Ground-Water Monitoring at
Waste Disposal Facilities. Ground Water, 29, 729-736.
Gibbons, R.D., Jarke, F.H., and Stoub, K.P. 1991. Detection Limits: For Linear Calibration Curves with
Increasing Variance and Multiple Future Detection Decisions. Waste Testing and Quality Assurance. 3,
ASTM, SPT 1075, 377-390.
Gibbons, R.D. and Baker, J. 1991. The Properties ol Various Statistical Prediction Limits. Journal ol
Environmental Science and Health. A26-4, 535-553.
Gibbons, R.D. 1991. Statistical Tolerance Limits for Ground-Water Monitoring. Ground Water 29.
Gibbons, R.D. 1990. A General Statistical Procedure for Ground-Water Detection Monitoring at Waste
Disposal Facilities. Ground Water, 28, 235-243.
Gibbons, R.D., Grams, N.E., Jarke, F.H., and Stoub, K.P. 1990. Practical Quantitation Limits.
Proceedings ol Sixth Annual U.S. EPA Waste Testing and Quality Assurance Symposium. Vol. 1, 126-
142.
Gibbons, R.D., Jarke, F.H., and Stoub, K.P. 1989. Methods Detection Limits. Proceedings ol Fifth Annual
U.S. EPA Waste Testing and Quality Assurance Symposium. Vol. 2, 292-319.
Gibbons, R.D. 1987. Statistical Prediction Intervals lor the Evaluation ol Ground-Water Quality. Ground
Water, 25, 455-465.
9-55
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Monitoring Performance
Resources (cont.)
Gibbons, R.D. 1987. Statistical Models for the Analysis ol Volatile Organic Compounds in Waste
Disposal Facilities. Ground Water 25, 572-580.
Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods lor Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York.
Starks, T.H. 1988. Evaluation ol Control Chart Methodologies for RCRA Waste Sites. U.S. EPA Technical
Report CR814342-01-3.
Patil, G.P and Rao, C.R. eds, Elsevier. 1993. Handbook ol Statistics, Vol 12: Environmental Statistics.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Addendum to Interim Final Guidance Document Statistical Analysis ol Ground-Water
Monitoring Data at RCRA facilities. EPA530-R-93-003.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Guidance Document on Statistical Analysis ol Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA
Facilities-Interim Final Guidance.
9-56
-------
Part V
Ensuring Long-Term Protection
Chapter 10
Taking Corrective Action
-------
-------
Contents
I. Corrective Action Process 10-1
A. Unit Assessment 10-2
B. Unit Investigation 10-4
1. Specific Considerations for Ground-Water Investigations 10-5
2. Specific Considerations for Soil Investigations 10-6
3. Specific Considerations for Surface-Water Investigations 10-6
4. Specific Consideration for Air-Release Investigations 10-7
C. Interim Measures 10-8
D. Evaluating Potential Corrective Measures 10-10
1. Meeting Cleanup Standards 10-11
2. Evaluating Treatment Technologies 10-12
3. Evaluating the Long- and Short-Term Effectiveness of the Remedy 10-18
4. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reducing or Eliminating the Source of Contamination 10-19
5. Evaluating the Ease of Implementation 10-19
6. Measuring the Degree to Which Community Concerns are Met 10-20
E. Implementing Corrective Measures 10-20
1. Institutional Controls 10-20
2. Monitoring and Site Maintenance 10-22
3. No Further Action and Site Closure 10-22
Taking Corrective Action Activity List 10-23
Resources 10-24
Figures:
Figure 1. Corrective Action Process 10-2
Figure 2. Screening Process for Selecting Appropriate Treatment Technologies 10-17
Tables:
Table 1 Factors To Consider in Conducting a Unit Assessment 10-3
Table 2 Chemical Characteristics 10-3
Table 3 Site Characteristics 10-4
Table 4 Potential Release Mechanisms for Various Unit Types 10-7
Table 5 Examples of Interim Corrective Measures 10-8
-------
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Taking Corrective Action
This chapter will help you:
• Monitor the performance of a waste management unit and take
appropriate steps to remediate any contamination associated
with its operation.
• Locate and characterize the source of any contamination.
• Identify and evaluate potential corrective measures.
• Select and implement corrective measures to achieve attainment
of the established cleanup standard.
• Work closely with the state and community representatives.
Effective operation of a waste man-
agement unit involves checking
the performance of the waste man-
agement system components.
When components are not operat-
ing effectively or when a problem develops,
corrective action might be needed to protect
human health and the environment.
Corrective action involves identifying expo-
sure pathways of concern, selecting the best
corrective measure to achieve the appropriate
cleanup standard, and consulting with state
and community representatives.
This chapter will help address the follow-
ing questions.
• What steps are associated with correc-
tive action?
• What information should be collected
during investigations?
• What factors should be considered in
selecting an appropriate corrective mea-
sure?
• What is involved in implementing the
selected remedy?
I. Corrective
Action Process
The purpose of a corrective action program
is to assess the nature and extent of the releas-
es of waste or constituents from the waste
management unit(s); to evaluate unit charac-
teristics; and to identify, evaluate, and imple-
ment appropriate corrective measures to
protect human health and the environment.
The overall goal of any corrective action
should be to achieve a technically and eco-
nomically feasible cleanup standard at a speci-
fied point on the facility property. For new
facilities this point should be on facility prop-
erty, no more than 150 meters from the waste
management unit boundary (as established in
Chapter 9-Monitoring Performance). Existing
facilities can either use this same 150 meter
monitoring point standard or work with their
state agencies to determine an alternate set of
acceptable monitoring and cleanup criteria.
Using the ground-water pathway as an exam-
ple, the corrective action goal should be to
reduce constituent concentration levels to the
applicable maximum contaminant levels
(MCLs) or health based numbers at the moni-
10-1
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
toring point (i.e., for new units, no more than
150 meters from the waste management unit).
A corrective action program generally has
the components outlined here and in Figure
1 (and explained in greater detail below). The
detail required in each of these components
varies depending on the unit and its com-
plexity and only those tasks appropriate for
your site should be conducted. We recom-
mend that you coordinate with the state dur-
ing all phases of corrective action.
• Perform a unit assessment to locate
the actual or potential source(s) of
the release(s) of contaminants based
on waste management unit monitor-
ing information and the use of other
existing information.
• Perform a unit investigation to char-
acterize the nature and extent of con-
tamination from the unit and any
contamination that might be migrat-
ing beyond the facility boundary,
identify areas and populations threat-
ened by releases from the unit, and
determine short- and long-term
threats of releases from the unit to
human health and the environment.
• Identify, evaluate, and implement
interim measures, if needed. Interim
measures are short-term actions
taken to protect human health and
the environment while a unit assess-
ment or a unit investigation is being
performed or before a corrective
measure is selected.
• Identify, evaluate, and implement
corrective measures to abate the fur-
ther spread of contaminants, control
the source of contamination, and to
remediate releases from the unit.
• Design a program to monitor the
maintenance and performance of any
interim or final corrective measures
Figure 1 Corrective Action Process
Unit Assessment
Unit Investigation
Interim Measures
Corrective Measures
Evaluation
Corrective Measures
Implementation
to ensure that human health and the
environment are being protected.
A. Unit Assessment
Often the first activity in the corrective
action process is the unit assessment. A unit
assessment identifies potential and actual
releases from the unit and makes preliminary
determinations about release pathways, the
need for corrective action, and interim mea-
sures. If appropriate, evaluate the possibility
of addressing mul-
tiple units as the
corrective action
process proceeds.
Table 1 identifies a
number of factors
to consider during
a unit assessment.
Tables 2 and 3 pre-
sent some useful
properties and
parameters that
define chemical
10-2
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Table 1
Factors To Consider in Conducting a Unit Assessment
Unit/Site
Characteristics
Chemical
Migration
Characteristics Pathway;
Evidence of Release Exposure
Potential
Contamination
Parameters
- Concentrations
- Depth and location of
contamination
Physical Parameters
- Geology
- Depth to ground water
- Flow characteristics
- Climate
Historical Information
- History of unit
- Knowledge of waste
generation practices
Type of waste
placed in the unit
Volatilization
parameters
Toxicological
characteristics
Physical and
chemical properties
Chemical class
Soil sorption/
degradation
parameters
Facility's
geological
setting
Facility's
hydrogeological
setting
Atmospheric
conditions
Topographic
characteristics
Manmade
features (e.g.,
pipelines,
underground
utility lines)
Prior inspection reports
Citizen complaints
Monitoring data
Visual evidence, such as
discolored soil, seepage,
discolored surface water
or runoff
Other physical evidence
such as fish kills,
worker illness, or odors
Sampling data
Offsite water wells
Proximity to
affected
population
Proximity to
sensitive
environments
Likelihood of
migration to
potential
receptors
Table 2
Chemical Characteristics
Property/Parameter
Characteristics
Chemical properties
Chemical class
Chemical reactivity
Soil sorption parameters
Soil degradation parameters
Volatilization parameters
Density, viscosity
Acid, base, polar neutral, nonpolar neutral, inorganic
Oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, polymerization, precipitation,
biotic/abiotic
Cation exchange capacity, anion exchange capacity, soil/water
partition coefficient (Kd), octanol/water partition coefficient
(Kow)
Half-life, intermediate products of degradation
Henrys law constant, vapor pressure
10-3
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Table 3
Site Characteristics
Parameter/Information Characteristics
Contamination parameters
Physical parameters
Historical information
Concentration in soil, water, and subsurface gas; depth and
location of contamination
Permeability, particle size distribution,
moisture content, flow characteristics,
pH, wind directions, climate
History of the waste management unit
generation processes, waste quantity
organic matter, geology,
depth to ground water,
knowledge of waste
Additional information on performing unit assessments can be found in RCRA Facility Assessment
Guidance (U.S. EPA, 1986).
and site characteristics that you should consid-
er when characterizing your site and environ-
mental setting.
A beginning step is to review available site
information regarding unit characteristics,
waste characteristics, contaminant migration
pathways, evidence of release, and exposure
potential. Much of this information should
have been gathered in the site assessment (see
Chapter 4-Considering the Site) and waste
characterization phases (see Chapter
2-Characterizing Waste). Conducting a visual
site inspection of the unit will re-affirm avail-
able information and enable you to note any
visual evidence of releases. If necessary per-
form sampling to confirm or disprove suspect-
ed releases before performing an extensive unit
investigation.
B. Unit Investigation
A unit investigation is conducted after a
release from the operating unit has been con-
firmed. The purpose of the investigation is to
gather enough data to fully characterize the
nature, extent, and rate of migration of conta-
minants to determine and support the selec-
tion of the appropriate response action. It is
important to tailor unit investigations to spe-
cific conditions and circumstances at the unit
and focus on releases and potential pathways.
Although each medium will require specific
data and methodologies to investigate a
release, a general strategy for this investigation,
consisting of two elements, can be described
as follows.
• Collect and review monitoring data,
data which can be gathered from out-
side information sources on parame-
ters affecting the release, or new
information such as aerial photogra-
phy or waste characterization.
• Formulate and implement field inves-
tigations and sampling and analysis or
monitoring procedures designed to
verify suspected releases. Evaluate the
nature, extent, and rate of migration of
verified releases. Refer to Chapter
9-Monitoring Performance to help
design a monitoring program.
Detailed knowledge of source characteristics
is valuable in identifying constituents for
which to monitor, indicator parameters, and
10-4
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Guidance on Performing
Unit Investigations
Additional guidance on performing
unit inspections can be found in the fol-
lowing EPA documents:
• RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance
Volume I: Development of an RFI Work
Plan and General Considerations for
RCRA Facility Investigations (U.S. EPA,
1989a)
• RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance
Volume II: Soil, Ground Water, and
Subsurface Gas Releases (U.S. EPA,
1989b)
• RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance
Volume III: Air and Surface Water
Releases (U.S. EPA, 1989c)
• RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance
Volume IV: Case Study Examples (U.S.
EPA, 1989d)
• Guidance for Conducting Remedial
Investigations and Feasibility Studies
Under CERCLA (U.S. EPA, 1988a)
• Draft Practical Guide for Assessing and
Remediating Contaminated Sites (U.S.
EPA, 1989f)
• Site Characterization for Subsurface
Remediation (U.S. EPA, 199 Ic)
possible release pathways. It is also helpful in
linking releases to a particular unit.
Monitoring information collected by a pro-
gram described in Chapter 9-Monitoring
Performance can be helpful. Waste and unit
characteristics can also provide information
for determining release rates and for deter-
mining the nature and scope of any corrective
measures which might be applied. Refer to
Chapter 2-Characterizing Waste for informa-
tion on how to characterize a waste.
Unit investigations can result in significant
amounts of data, including the results of
chemical, physical, or biological analyses. This
can involve analyses of many constituents, in
different media, at various sampling locations,
and at different times. Data management pro-
cedures should be established to effectively
process these data such that relevant data
descriptions, such as sample numbers, loca-
tions, procedures, and methods, are readily
accessible and accurately maintained.
1. Specific Considerations for
Ground-Water Investigations
To facilitate ground-water investigations
consider the following parameters:
• Ability of the waste to be dissolved or
to appear as a distinct phase.
• Degradability of the waste and its
decomposition products.
• Geologic
and
hydrolog-
ic factors
which
affect the
release
pathway.
• Regional
and site-
specific
ground-
water
flow
regimes
that might affect the potential magni-
tude of the release pathways and possi-
ble exposure routes.
Exposure routes of concern include inges-
tion of ground water as drinking water and
near-surface flow of contaminated ground
water into basements of residences or other
10-5
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
structures. It is important to also address the
potential for the transfer of contaminants in
ground water to other environmental media
through processes such as discharge to surface
water and volatilization to the atmosphere.
Use existing ground-water monitoring infor-
mation, where it exists, to determine the
nature, extent, and rate of contaminant release
from the unit(s) to the ground water.
Investigation of a suspected release might be
terminated based on results from an initial
monitoring phase if these results show that an
actual release has not, in fact, occurred. If,
however, contamination is found, you should
characterize the release through subsequent
monitoring to help determine the detailed con-
stituent composition and concentrations, the
horizontal and vertical extent of the contami-
nant release, as well as its rate of migration as
appropriate to assess the risk. This should be
accomplished through direct sampling and
analysis and, when appropriate, can be supple-
mented by indirect means such as geophysical
assessment and fate and transport modeling.
2. Specific Considerations for Soil
Investigations
When performing soil investigations, con-
sider the following parameters:
• Ability of the waste to be dissolved by
infiltrating precipitation.
• The waste's affinity for soil particles.
• The waste's degradability and its
decomposition products.
• Surface features such as topography,
erosion potential, land-use potential,
and vegetation.
• Stratigraphic/hydrologic features such
as soil profile, particle-size distribution,
hydraulic conductivity, pH, porosity,
and cation exchange capacity.
• Meteorological factors such as temper-
ature, precipitation, runoff, and evap-
otranspiration.
Relevant physical and chemical properties of
the soil should be assessed to help determine
potential mobility of any contaminants in the
soil. Also, consider the potential for transfer of
contaminants in the soil to other environmental
media such as overland runoff to surface water,
leaching to ground water, and volatilization to
the atmosphere. In addition, you should estab-
lish whether a potential release involved a
point source (localized) or a non-point source.
Point sources might include container handling
and storage areas, tanks, waste piles, and bulk
chemical transfer areas. Non-point sources
might include airborne paniculate contamina-
tion originating from a land application unit
and widespread leachate seeps from a landfill.
Table 4 presents important mechanisms of con-
taminant release to soils for various unit types.
This information can be used to identify areas
for initial soil monitoring.
3. Specific Considerations for
Surface-Water Investigations
When conducting surface-water investiga-
tions, the following factors should be consid-
ered:
• The release mechanism, such as over-
topping of an impoundment.
10-6
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Unit Type
Table 4
Potential Release Mechanisms for Various Unit Types
Release Mechanism
Surface impoundment
Releases from overtopping
Leakage through dikes or unlined portions to surrounding soils
Landfill
Migration of releases outside the unit's runoff collection and containment
system
Seepage through underlying soils
Waste pile
Migration of releases outside the unit's runoff collection and containment
system
Seepage through underlying soils
Land application unit
Migration of runoff outside the application area
Passage of leachate into the soil horizon
• The nature of the source area, such as
point or non-point.
• Waste type and degradabifity
• Locaf cfimate.
• Hydrofogic factors such as stream
flow conditions.
• The ability for a contaminant to accu-
mulate in stream bottom sediments.
Also, address the potential for the transfer
of contaminants in surface water to other
environmental media such as soil contamina-
tion as a result of flooding of a contaminated
creek on the facility property.
During the initial investigation, particular
attention should be given to sampling runoff
from contaminated areas, leachate seeps, and
other similar sources of surface-water contami-
nation, as these are the primary overland release
pathways for surface water. Releases to surface
water via ground-water discharge should be
addressed as part of the ground-water investiga-
tion for greater efficiency. See Chapter
9-Monitoring Performance, Section II: Surface-
Water Monitoring for information on proper
surface-water monitoring techniques.
4. Specific Consideration for Air-
Release Investigations
The intent of an air-release investigation is
to determine any actual or potential effects at
a nearby receptor. This might involve emis-
10-7
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
sion modeling to estimate unit-specific emis-
sion rates, air monitoring to determine con-
centrations at a nearby receptor, emission
monitoring at the source to determine emis-
sion rates, and dispersion modeling to esti-
mate concentrations at a nearby receptor. See
Chapter 9-Monitoring Performance, Section
IV: Air Monitoring for more information on
air monitoring and Chapter 5-Protecting Air
for more information on air modeling.
As in other media-specific investigations,
the first step is to collect, review, and evaluate
available waste, unit, environmental setting,
and release data. Evaluation of these data can
indicate the need for corrective measures or
that no further action is required. For exam-
ple, the source might involve a large, active
storage surface impoundment containing
volatile constituents adjacent to residential
housing. Action, therefore, instead of further
studies, might be appropriate. Another case
might involve a unit in an isolated location,
where an acceptable modeling or monitoring
database indicates that the air release can be
considered insignificant and, therefore, fur-
ther studies are not warranted. In many
cases, however, further release characteriza-
tion might be necessary.
C. Interim Measures
Many cleanup programs recognize the
need for interim measures while site charac-
terization is underway or before a final reme-
dy is selected. Typically, interim measures are
used to control or abate ongoing risks before
final remedy selection. Examples of interim
measures for various types of waste manage-
ment units and various release types are list-
ed in Table 5. More information is available
through the RCRA Corrective Action Interim
Measures Guidance—Interim Final (U.S. EPA,
Unit/Release
Table 5
Examples of Interim Corrective Measures
Interim Measure
Containers
Overpack or redrum
Construct storage area
Move to new storage area
Segregation
Sampling and analysis
Treatment or storage
Temporary cover
Tanks
Construct overflow/secondary containment
Leak detection or repair
Partial or complete removal
Surface Impoundments
Reduce head
Remove free liquids and highly mobile wastes
Stabilize or repair side walls, dikes, or liner(s)
Temporary cover
Run-on or runoff control (diversion or collection devices)
Sample and analyze to document the concentration of constituents
Interim ground-water measures
10-8
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Table 5
Examples of Interim Corrective Measures (cont.)
Unit/Release
Interim Measure
Landfills
Run-on or runoff control (diversion or collection devices)
Reduce head on liner or leachate collection and removal system
Inspect leachate collection and removal system, or french drain
Repair leachate collection and removal system, or french drain
Temporary cap
Waste removal
Interim ground-water measures
Waste Piles
Run-on or runoff control (diversion or collection devices)
Temporary cover
Waste removal
Interim ground-water measures
Soils
Sampling or analysis
Removal and disposal
Run-on or runoff control (diversion or collection devices)
Temporary cap or cover
Ground Water
Delineation or verification of gross contamination
Sampling and analysis
Interceptor trench, sump, or subsurface drain
Pump-and-treat
In situ treatment
Temporary cap or cover
Surface-Water Releases
(Point and Non-Point)
Overflow or underflow dams
Filter fences
Run-on or runoff control (diversion or collection devices)
Regrading or revegetation
Sample and analyze surface waters and sediments or point source discharges
Gas Mitigation Control
Barriers
Collection
Treatment
Monitoring
Particulate Emissions
Truck wash (decontamination unit)
Revegetation
Application of dust suppressant
Other Actions
Fencing to prevent direct contact
Sampling offsite areas
Alternate water supply to replace contaminated drinking water
Temporary relocation of exposed population
Temporary or permanent injunction
10-9
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
1988b) and RCRA Corrective Action
Stabilization Technologies (U.S. EPA, 1992b).
Interim measures can be separate from the
comprehensive corrective action plan, but
should be consistent with and integrated into
any longer term corrective measure. To the
extent possible, interim measures should not
seriously complicate the ultimate physical
management of wastes or constituents, nor
should they present or exacerbate a health or
environmental threat.
D. Evaluating Potential
Corrective Measures
The corrective measure or measures select-
ed should meet the corrective action goals,
such as a state or local cleanup standard, and
control or remove the source of contamina-
tion to reduce or eliminate further releases.
Most corrective measures fall into one of
three technology categories—containment
technologies, extraction or removal technolo-
gies, or treatment technologies. The perfor-
mance objectives of the corrective measures
relate to source reduction, cleanup goals, and
cleanup timeframe. These measures might
include the repair or upgrade of existing unit
components, such as liner systems, leachate
collection systems, or covers.
You should base selection of corrective
measures on the following considerations and
contact the state and community representa-
tives before finalizing the selection:
• The ability to meet appropriate
cleanup standards.
• The appropriateness and effectiveness
of the treatment technology in rela-
tion to waste and site characteristics.
• The long- and short-term effectiveness
including economic, technical feasibil-
ity, and protectiveness of the remedy.
Potential Corrective
Measures
Additional guidance on potential cor-
rective measures is available from the
following documents:
• Corrective Action: Technologies and
Applications (U.S. EPA, 1989c)
• Handbook: Stabilization Technologies for
RCRA Corrective Actions (U.S. EPA,
199Ib)
• RCRA Corrective Action Stabilization
Technologies (U.S. EPA, 1992b)
• Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water
Remediation: A Guide for Decision
Makers and Practitioners (U.S. EPA,
1996c)
• Handbook: Remediation of
Contaminated Sediments (U.S. EPA,
199 la)
• Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies
(U.S. EPA, 1995)
• Bioremediation Resource Guide (U.S.
EPA, 1993)
• Groundwater Treatment Technology
Resource Guide (U.S. EPA, 1994a)
• Physical/Chemical Treatment Technology
Resource Guide (U.S. EPA, 1994b)
• Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
Technology Resource Guide (U.S. EPA,
1994d)
The effectiveness of the remedy in
reducing further releases.
The ease of implementing the remedy.
The degree to which local communi-
ty concerns have been addressed.
10-10
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
1. Meeting Cleanup Standards
Work with your state and community rep-
resentatives to establish risk-based cleanup
standards for the media of concern before
identifying potential corrective measures. For
example, if there is a statistically significant
increase of constituent concentrations over
background in the ground water, cleanup
standards would include reducing contami-
nant concentrations to the MCL or health-
based level at the point of monitoring.
Several approaches have been developed to
identify appropriate cleanup standards. One of
the more recent approaches is the Risk-Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) standard developed
by some states and the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) Committee. The
RBCA standard provides guidance on how to
integrate ecological and human-health, risk-
based, decision-making into the traditional
corrective action process described above.
RBCA is a decision-making process for the
assessment and response to chemical releases.
This standard is applicable to all types of
chemical-release sites, which can vary greatly
in terms of their complexity, physical and
chemical characteristics, and the risk they pose
to human health and the environment. RBCA
uses a tiered approach that begins with simple
analyses and moves to more complex evalua-
tions when necessary. The foundation of the
RBCA process is that technical policy decisions
are identified in the front-end of the process to
ensure that data collected are of sufficient
quantity and quality to answer questions
posed at each tier of the investigation. The
RBCA standard is not intended to replace
existing regulatory programs, but rather to
provide an enhancement to these programs.
The RBCA process allows for a three-tiered
approach as described below.
In recent years, many states have adopted
similar risk-based guidance or rules. The
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality, for instance, promulgated its Risk
Evaluation/Corrective Action Program
(RECAP) final rule, on June 20, 2000.
Likewise, the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission (TNRCC) finalized
the Texas Risk Reduction Program in 1999
(Title 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC)
Chapter 350). Your state and community rep-
resentatives can tell you whether similar RBCA
standards exist in your state and the appropri-
ateness of such an approach. ASTM also offers
two training courses on RBCA: Risk-Based
Corrective Action for Chemical Releases, and
Risk Based Corrective Action Applied at
Petroleum Release Sites. These courses are
open to all individuals from federal, state, trib-
al, and local regulatory agencies as well as pro-
fessionals from the private sector.
RBCA Tier 1 Evaluation
A Tier 1 evaluation classifies a site accord-
ing to the urgency for corrective action using
broad measures of release and exposure. This
tier is used to identify the source(s) of the
chemical release, obvious environmental
impacts, potential receptors, and significant
exposure pathways. During a Tier 1 evalua-
tion, site-specific contaminant concentrations
are compared against a standard table of risk-
based screening levels (RBSLs) that have been
developed using conservative, nonsite-specif-
ic exposure assumptions. If a site's contami-
nant concentrations are found to be above
the RBSLs, then corrective action or further
evaluation would be considered. Continued
monitoring might be the only requirement if
site-specific contaminant concentrations are
below the RBSLs.
At the end of the Tier 1 evaluation, initial
corrective action responses are selected while
additional analysis is conducted to determine
final remedial action, if necessary. The stan-
dard includes an exposure scenario evalua-
tion flowchart to help identify appropriate
10-11
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
receptors and exposure scenarios based on
current and projected reasonable land use
scenarios, and appropriate response actions.
Site conditions should also be compared to
relevant ecological screening criteria (RESC)
applicable to the site which might include
qualitative or quantitative benchmarks, com-
parison of site conditions to local biological
and environmental conditions, or considera-
tions related to the exposed habitat areas.
RBCA Tier 2 Evaluation
The user might decide to conduct a Tier 2
evaluation after selecting and implementing
the appropriate initial response action to the
Tier 1 evaluation. The purpose of this tier is
to determine site-specific target levels (SSTLs)
and appropriate points of compliance when it
is determined that Tier 1 RBSLs have been
exceeded. While a Tier 2 evaluation is based
on similar screening levels as those used in
the Tier 1 evaluation, some of the generic
assumptions used in the earlier evaluation are
replaced with site-specific measurements to
develop the SSTLs. The intent of Tier 2 is to
incorporate the concept that measured levels
of contamination can decline over the dis-
tance from source to receptor. Thus, simple
environmental fate and transport modeling is
used to predict attenuation over that distance.
If site-specific contaminant concentrations are
above the SSTLs, corrective action is needed
and further analysis might be required.
RBCA Tier 3 Evaluation
A Tier 3 evaluation involves the same steps
as those taken during the Tier 1 and Tier 2
evaluations, except that a significant increase
in effort is employed to better define the
scope of the contamination. Actual levels of
contamination are compared to SSTLs that
are developed for this Tier. The Tier 3 SSTLs
differ from Tier 2 SSTLs in the level of
sophistication used to develop site-specific
measures of the fate and transport of contam-
inants. Where simplified, site-specific mea-
sures of the fate and transport are used in the
Tier 2 evaluation, much more sophisticated
models and data will be used in this Tier.
These models might rely on probabilistic
approaches and on alternative toxicity and
biodegradability data.
2. Evaluating Treatment
Technologies
In nearly every phase of the corrective
action process, some information about treat-
ment technologies is important. Many docu-
ments exist that describe candidate
technologies in detail and give their respec-
tive applicability and limitations. Below are
descriptions and examples of the three major
technology categories: containment, extrac-
tion, and treatment.
Containment technologies are used to stop
the further spread or migration of contami-
nants. Some examples of common contain-
ment techniques for constituents in
land-based units include waste stabilization,
solidification, and capping. Capping and
other surface-water diversion techniques, for
instance, can control infiltration of rainwater
to the contaminated medium. Typical ways to
contain contaminated ground-water plumes
include ground-water pumping, subsurface
drains, and barrier or slurry walls. These
ground-water containment technologies con-
trol the migration of contaminants in the
ground-water plume and prevent further dis-
solution of contaminants by water entering
the unit.
• Ground-water pumping. Ground-
water pumping can be used to
manipulate and manage ground
water for the purpose of removing,
diverting, and containing a contami-
nated plume or for adjusting ground-
10-12
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
water levels to prevent plume move-
ment. For example, pumping systems
consisting of a series of extraction
wells located directly downgradient
from a contaminated source can be
used to collect the contaminated
plume. The success of any contami-
nant capture system based upon
pumping wells is dependent upon
the rate of ground-water flow and the
rate at which the well is pumped.
Thus, the zone of capture for the
pumping system must be established.
Subsurface drains. Subsurface
drains are essentially permeable bar-
riers designed to intercept the
ground-water flow. The water is col-
lected at a low point and pumped or
drained by gravity to the treatment
system. Subsurface drains can also be
used to isolate a waste disposal area
by intercepting the flow of unconta-
minated ground water before it enters
into a contaminated site. Subsurface
drains are most useful in preliminary
containment applications for control-
ling pollutant migration, while a final
treatment design is developed and
implemented. They also provide a
measure of long-term protection
against residual contaminants follow-
ing conclusion of treatment and site
closure.
Barrier walls. Low permeability bar-
riers are used to direct the uncontam-
inated ground-water flow around a
particular site or to prevent the cont-
aminated material from migrating
from the site. Barrier walls can be
made of a wide variety of materials,
as long as they have a lower perme-
ability than the aquifer. Typical mate-
rials include mixtures of soil and
bentonite, mixtures of cement and
bentonite, or barriers of engineered
materials (sheet piling). A chemical
analysis of wall/contaminant compati-
bility is necessary for the final selec-
tion of materials. The installation of a
low permeability barrier usually
entails a great deal of earth moving,
requires a significant amount of land
area, and is expensive. Once in place,
however, it represents a long-term,
low maintenance system.
Extraction or removal technologies physi-
cally remove constituents from a site.
Extraction techniques might remove the con-
stituent of concern only, or the contaminated
media itself. For example, vapor extraction
might just remove the constituent vapors from
the soil, while excavation could remove all of
the contaminated soil. Extraction technologies
include excavation, pumping, product recov-
ery, vapor extraction or recovery, and soil
washing.
Treatment or destruction technologies ren-
der constituents less harmful through physi-
cal, biological, chemical, and thermal
processes including ground-water treatment,
pH adjustment, oxidation and reduction,
bioremediation, and incineration.
• Ground-water pump-and-treat is
one of the most widely used ground-
water treatment technologies.
Conventional methods involve
10-13
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
pumping contaminated water to the
surface for treatment. Pump-and-
treat systems are used primarily for
hydraulic containment and treatment
to reduce the dissolved contaminant
concentrations in ground water so
that the aquifer complies with clean-
up standards or the treated water
withdrawn from the aquifer can be
put to beneficial use. A thorough,
three-dimensional characterization of
subsurface soils and hydrogeology
including particle-size distribution,
sorption characteristics, and
hydraulic conductivity, provides a
firm basis for appropriate placement
of pump-and-treat wells. The follow-
ing techniques can be useful in effec-
tively designing and operating the
pump-and-treat system:
- Using capture zone analysis, opti-
mization modeling, and data
obtained from monitoring the
effects of initial extraction wells to
identify the best locations for wells.
- Phasing the construction of extrac-
tion and monitoring wells so that
information obtained from the
operation of the initial wells
informs decisions about siting sub-
sequent wells.
- Phasing pumping rates and the
operation of individual wells to
enhance containment, avoid stagna-
tion zones, and ensure removal of
the most contaminated ground
water first.
Chemical treatment is a class of
processes in which specific chemicals
are added to wastes or to contami-
nated media in order to achieve
detoxification. Depending on the
nature of the contaminants, the
chemical processes required might
include pH adjustment, lysis, oxida-
tion, reduction, or a combination of
these. In addition, chemical treat-
ment is often used to prepare for or
facilitate the treatment of wastes by
other technologies.
- The function of pH adjustment is to
neutralize acids and bases and to
promote the formation of precipi-
tates, which can subsequently be
removed by conventional settling
techniques. Typically, pH adjust-
ment is effective in treating inor-
ganic or corrosive wastes.
- Oxidation and reduction reactions
are utilized to change the chemical
form of a hazardous material, in
order to render it less toxic or to
change its solubility, stability, sepa-
rability, or otherwise change it for
handling or disposal purposes. In
any oxidation reaction, the oxida-
tion state of one compound is
raised (i.e., oxidized) while the oxi-
dation state of another compound
is lowered (i.e., reduced). In the
reaction, the compound supplying
the oxygen (or chlorine or other
negative ion) is called the oxidizer
or oxidizing agent, while the com-
pound accepting the oxygen (i.e.,
supplying the positive ion) is called
the reducing agent. The reaction
can be enhanced by catalysis, elec-
trolysis, or photolysis.
- The basic function of lysis process-
es is to split molecules to permit
further treatment. Hydrolysis is a
chemical reaction in which water
reacts with another substance. In
the reaction, the water molecule is
ionized while the other compound
10-14
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
is split into ionic groups. Photolysis,
another lysis process, breaks chemi-
cal bonds by irradiating a chemical
with ultraviolet light. Catalysis uses
a catalyst to achieve bond cleavage.
Biological treatment is a destruction
process relying primarily on oxidative
or reductive mechanisms. The two
types of biological treatment process-
es are aerobic and anaerobic. Aerobic
processes are oxidative processes and
are the most widely used. These
processes require a supply of molecu-
lar oxygen and include suspended
growth systems, fixed-film systems,
hybrid reactors, and in situ applica-
tion. Anaerobic processes achieve the
reduction of organic matter to
methane and carbon dioxide in an
oxygen-free environment. The use of
biological treatment processes is
directed toward accomplishing
destruction of organic contaminants,
oxidation of organic chemicals
whereby the organic chemicals are
broken down into smaller con-
stituents, and dehalogenation of
organic chemicals by cleaving a chlo-
rine atom(s) or other halogens from a
compound.
Biological processes can be used on a
broad class of biodegradable organic
contaminants. It should be noted,
however, that very high concentra-
tions as well as very low concentra-
tions of organic contaminants are
difficult to treat via biological
processes. Since microorganisms need
appropriate conditions in which to
function, you must provide an opti-
mum environment, whether above-
ground in a reactor or belowground
for an in situ application. The prima-
ry conditions which can affect the
growth of the microbial community,
in addition to providing them suffi-
cient food (organic material), are pH,
temperature, oxygen concentration,
nutrients, and toxicity
- Typically, a biological treatment sys-
tem operates best when a waste
stream is at a pH near 7. However,
waste treatment systems can operate
(with some exceptions) between pH
values of 4 and 10. The exceptions
are aerobic systems in which
ammonia is oxidized to NOX as well
as anaerobic methane fermenting
systems. For these, the pH should
be between 6 and 8; outside this
range, efficiency will suffer.
- Waste treatment systems can func-
tion over a temperature range of 5°
to 60°C. Most waste treatment sys-
tems operate between 15° to 45°C
and use mesophilic organisms.
- Microorganisms need a certain
amount of oxygen not only to sur-
vive but also to control their reac-
tions. Therefore, the residual
dissolved oxygen concentrations
should be maintained at approxi-
mately 2 mg/1 or greater within a
typical liquid biotreatment system.
- The quantity of nutrients needed
depends on the biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) of the waste. The
higher the BOD, the higher the num-
ber of cells produced and the greater
the quantity of nutrients required.
- The presence of toxic substances
will obviously produce adverse con-
ditions in a biological system.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to cite
specific toxic materials because toxi-
city depends on concentration.
Nutrients can be toxic in higher
10-15
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
concentrations and all types of
organic compounds which can be
used as food by bacteria can be
toxic if their concentrations are
high enough. Frequently toxicity
concerns can be avoided by waste
dilution and microbe acclimation.
Thermal treatment, or incineration,
is a treatment technology applicable
to the treatment of wastes containing
a wide range of organic concentra-
tions and low concentrations of
water, metals, and other inorganics.
Incineration is the thermal decompo-
sition of organic constituents via
cracking and oxidation reactions at
high temperatures that can be used
for detoxification, sterilization, vol-
ume reduction, energy recovery, and
by-product chemical recovery. A
well-designed and properly operated
incinerator will destroy all but a tiny
fraction of the organic compounds
contained in the waste. Incinerator
emission gases are composed primar-
ily of carbon dioxide and water. The
type and quantity of other com-
pounds emitted depends on the com-
position of the wastes, the
completeness of the combustion
process, and the air pollution control
equipment with which the incinera-
tor is equipped. Incinerators are
designed to accept wastes of varying
physical forms, including gasses, liq-
uids, sludges, and solids.
Stabilization/solidification process-
es immobilize toxic or hazardous
constituents in a waste by changing
the constituent into immobile forms,
binding them in an immobile matrix,
or binding them in a matrix which
minimizes the waste material surface
exposed to solvent. Often, the immo-
bilized product has a structural
strength sufficient to prevent fractur-
ing over time. Solidification accom-
plishes the intended objective by
changing a non-solid waste material
into a solid, monolithic structure that
ideally will not permit liquids to per-
colate into or leach materials out of
the mass. Stabilization, on the other
hand, binds the hazardous con-
stituents into an insoluble matrix or
changes the hazardous constituent to
an insoluble form. Other objectives
of solidification/stabilization process-
es are to improve handling of the
waste and produce a stable solid (no
free liquid) for subsequent use as a
construction material or for landfill-
ing. Major categories of industrial
waste solidification/stabilization sys-
tems are cement-based processes.
Waste characteristics such as organic
content, inorganic content, viscosity,
and particle size distribution can
affect the quality of the final solidi-
fied product. These characteristics
inhibit the solidification process by
affecting the compatibility of the
binder and the waste, the complete-
ness of encapsulation, and the devel-
opment of preferential paths for
leaching due to spurious debris in
the waste matrix.
In selecting a treatment technology or set
of technologies, it is important to consider the
information obtained from the waste and site
characterizations, see Chapter
2-Characterizing Waste and Chapter
4-Considering the Site. For example, the
waste characterization should tell the location
of the waste and in what phase(s) the waste
should be expected to be found, (e.g., sorbed
to soil particles). Waste characterization infor-
mation also allows for the assessment of the
leaching characteristics of the waste, its ability
1 U.S. EPA, 1991. Site Characterization for Subsurface Remediations.
10-16
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
to be degraded, and its tendency to react with
chemicals. The site characterization informa-
tion should reveal important information
about subsurface flow conditions and other
physical characteristics, such as organic car-
bon content. You should use the information
from the waste and site characterizations to
select the appropriate treatment technology.
A screening process for selecting an appro-
priate technology is presented in Figure 2. In
some cases, a treatment train, a series of tech-
nologies combined together, might be appro-
priate.1 This step-by-step approach helps
ensure that technologies that might be applic-
able at a site are not overlooked. In addition,
the rationale for the elimination of specific
technologies will be available to justify deci-
sions to interested parties.
Additional information regarding the use
and development of innovative treatment
technologies is available from EPAs
Hazardous Waste Clean-up Information
(CLU-IN) Web site . This Web
site describes programs, organizations, publi-
cations, and other tools for all waste remedia-
tion stakeholders. Of particular interest is the
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix
which is a user-friendly tool to screen for
technologies for a remediation project. The
matrix allows you to screen through 64 in
situ and ex situ technologies for either soil or
ground-water remediation. Variables used in
screening include contaminants, development
status, overall cost, and cleanup time. The
matrix can be accessed through CLU-IN or
directly from the Federal Remediation
Technologies Roundtable's Web site
.
Another source of information is the Field
Analytic Technologies Encyclopedia (FATE)
developed by EPAs Technology Innovation
Office (TIO), in collaboration with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. FATE is an online
encyclopedia of information about technolo-
Figure 2
Recommended Screening Process for
Selecting Appropriate Treatment Technologies
Evaluate waste and site-specific information and
identify potential treatment technologies
Develop a conceptual design for each technolo-
gy including:
• Process description
• Process flow diagram
• Layout drawing
• Preliminary sizing of equipment, utility, and
land requirements
• Chemical requirements
• Expected residuals
Compare technologies using:
• Effectiveness and reliability of technology
meeting cleanup goals
• Beneficial and adverse effects on the environ-
ment
• Beneficial and adverse effects on human
health
• Ability to meet federal, state, and local govern-
ment standards and gain public acceptance
• Capital, operating, and maintenance costs
Select most appropriate technology in consulta-
tion with state and community representatives
Obtain state approval
gies that can be used in the field to character-
ize contaminated soil and ground water,
monitor the progress of remedial efforts, and
in some cases, confirm sampling and analysis
for site closure. To access FATE visit:
.
10-17
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
3. Evaluating the Long- and
Short-Term Effectiveness of
the Remedy
Evaluating the long- and short-term effec-
tiveness of the remedy, involves analyzing the
risks associated with potential exposure path-
ways, estimates of potential exposure levels,
and the duration of potential exposure asso-
ciated with the construction and implemen-
Treatability Studies
The four general types of treatability
studies are laboratory-scale, bench-scale,
pilot-scale, and field-scale.
• Laboratory-scale studies are small
scale screening studies that generate
qualitative information concerning
the general validity of a treatment
approach.
• Bench-scale studies are intermediate
studies conducted in the laboratory.
Bench scale studies are intended to
answer specific design, operation, and
cost questions, and are more detailed
than laboratory studies.
• Pilot-scale studies are large scale
experiments intended to provide
quantitative cost and design data.
They simulate anticipated full-scale
operational configurations as closely
as possible.
• Field-scale studies are large scale
studies intended to monitor the per-
formance of treatment systems under
real world conditions at close to full
scale operations.
More information on treatability stud-
ies can be found in A Guide for
Conducting Treatability Studies Under
CERCLA (U.S. EPA, 1992a).
tation of the corrective measure. Because
waste characteristics vary from site to site,
the effect of a treatment technology with a
particular waste might be unknown. It is
important, therefore, to consider performing
a treatability study to evaluate the effective-
ness of one or more potential remedies.
Spending the time and money up-front to
better assess the effectiveness of a technology
on a waste can save significant time and
money later in the process. To judge the
technical certainty that the remedy will attain
the corrective action goal, also consider
reviewing case studies where similar tech-
nologies have been applied.
It is also important to analyze the time to
complete the corrective measure, because it
directly impacts the cost of the remedy. It is
therefore important to carefully evaluate the
long-term costs of the remedial alternatives
and the long-term financial condition of the
facility. Consider including quality control
measures in the implementation schedule to
assess the progress of the corrective measure.
It is also important to determine the degree
to which the remedy complies with all
applicable state laws.
The Federal Remediation Technologies
Roundtable is at the fore-
front of the federal government's efforts to
promote interagency cooperation to advance
the use of innovative remediation technolo-
gies. Roundtable member agencies include
EPA, the U.S. Department of Defense, the
U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S.
Department of Interior. This group has pre-
pared over 209 cost and performance reports
that can be accessed through CLU-IN
. These reports
contained in the "Federal Remediation
Technologies Roundtable Case Studies" docu-
ment results from completed full-scale haz-
ardous waste site remediation projects and
several large-scale demonstration projects.
10-18
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
They are meant to serve as primary reference
sources, and they contain information on site
background and setting, contaminants and
media treated, technology, cost and perfor-
mance, and points of contact for the technol-
ogy application.
EPA has also prepared an overview of
ground-water cleanup at 28 sites entitled
Groundwater Cleanup: Overview of Operating
Experience at 28 Sites (U.S. EPA, 1999a) that is
also available from CLU-IN. This overview
presents a range of the types of cleanups typi-
cally performed at sites with contaminated
ground water and summarizes information
about the remediation systems at the 28 sites.
Summarized information includes design,
operation, and performance of the systems;
capital, operating, and unit costs of the sys-
tems; and factors that potentially affect the cost
and performance of the systems.
EPAs TIO Web site
provides additional information about site
characterization and treatment technologies
for remediation. This Web site offers technol-
ogy selection tools and describes programs,
organizations, and available publications.
Some of the available publications include
Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies, Volumes
1-4 (U.S. EPA, 2000a) which summarize 218
case studies of site remediation prepared by
federal agencies. Many of these publications
and links are also available through CLU-IN.
4. Evaluating the Effectiveness of
Reducing or Eliminating the
Source of Contamination
There are two major components of source
control that should be evaluated. First, if
source control consists of the removal, redis-
posal, or treatment of wastes, the volume of
wastes and residual materials should be
quantified and the potential to cause further
contamination evaluated. Second, engineering
controls intended to upgrade or repair defi-
cient conditions at a waste management unit
should be quantified in terms of anticipated
effectiveness according to current and future
conditions. This evaluation should determine
what is technically and financially practicable.
Health considerations and the potential for
unacceptable exposure(s) to both workers
and the public can affect an evaluation.
5. Evaluating the Ease of
Implementation
The ease of implementing the proposed
corrective measure will affect its schedule. To
evaluate the ease of implementation of a spe-
cific corrective measure, it is important to
Selecting a Corrective
Action Specialist
Once it has been determined that cor-
rective measures are necessary, you should
determine if in-house expertise is adequate
or if an outside consultant is necessary.
If a consultant is needed, determine if
the prospective consultant has the tech-
nical competence to do the work need-
ed. A poor design for a recovery system,
unacceptable field procedures, lack of
familiarity with state requirements, or an
inadequate investigation might unneces-
sarily cost thousands of dollars and still
not complete the cleanup.
Some of the most important informa-
tion to consider in selecting a consultant
is whether the consultant has experience
performing site investigations and reme-
diations at similar sites, is familiar with
state regulations, has staff trained in the
use of field screening instruments, has
experience in monitoring well design
and installations, has established quality
assurance and quality control proce-
dures, and can provide references.
10-19
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
consider the availability of technical expertise
and equipment, the ability to properly man-
age, dispose, or treat wastes generated by the
corrective measure, and the likelihood of
obtaining local permits and public accep-
tance for the remedy. Consider also the
potential for contamination to transfer from
one media to another as part of the overall
feasibility of the remedy. Cross-media
impacts should be addressed as part of the
implementation phase. Develop a corrective-
measure schedule identifying the beginning
and end periods of the permitting, construc-
tion, treatment, and source control measures.
6. Measuring the Degree to
Which Community Concerns
are Met
Prior to selecting the corrective measure(s),
you should hold a public meeting to discuss
the results of the corrective action assessment
and to identify proposed remedies. Consider
notifying adjacent property owners via mail of
Citizen Guides to
Treatment Technologies
EPA's Technology Innovation Office
has developed a series of fact sheets that
explain, in basic terms, the operation
and application of innovative treatment
technologies for remediating sites. The
fact sheets address issues associated with
innovative treatment technologies as a
whole, bioremediation, chemical dehalo-
genation, in situ soil flushing, natural
attenuation, phytoremediation, soil
vapor extraction and air sparging, soil
washing, solvent extraction, thermal des-
orption, and the use of treatment walls.
English and Spanish versions of these
fact sheets can be downloaded from
CLU-IN
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
state could adopt a statutory mandate, for
example, requiring the use of deed restric-
tions as a way of enforcing use restrictions
and posting signs. Commonly used institu-
tional controls include deed restrictions, use
restrictions, access controls, notices, registry
act requirements, transfer act requirements,
and contractual obligations. Additional infor-
mation on institutional controls is available at
EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response Web site at
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
must comply with regulatory require-
ments in regard to use and transfer of
the site. The use of a site listed on
the registry can not be changed with-
out permission from the state agency.
Transfer act requirements. Some
states have transfer act programs that
require full evaluation of all environ-
mental issues before or after the
transfer occurs. It might be that,
within such a program, institutional
controls can be established by way of
consent order, administrative order,
or some other technique that estab-
lishes implementation and continued
responsibility for institutional con-
trols. A typical transfer act imposes
obligations and confers rights on par-
ties to a land transaction arising out
of the environmental status of the
property to be conveyed. Transfer
acts impose information obligations
on the seller or lessor of a property.
That party must disclose general
information about strict liability for
clean-up costs as well as property-
specific information, such as the
presence of hazardous substances,
permitting requirements and status,
releases, and enforcement actions
and variances.
Contractual obligations. One sys-
tem for ensuring future restrictions
on the use of a site, or the obligation
to remediate a site, is to require pri-
vate parties to restrict use by con-
tract. While this method is often
negotiated among private parties, it is
difficult, if not impossible, to institu-
tionalize control over the process
without interfering with the abilities
and rights of private parties to freely
negotiate these liabilities. Another
avenue is for the landowner or
responsible party to obligate itself to
the state by contract. The state might
require a contractual commitment
from the party to provide long-term
monitoring of the site, use restric-
tions, and the means of continued
funding for remediation.
2. Monitoring and Site
Maintenance
In many cases, monitoring might need to
be conducted to demonstrate the effective-
ness of the implemented corrective measures.
Consult with your state to determine the
amount of time that monitoring should be
conducted. Some corrective measures, such
as capping, hydraulic control, and other
physical barriers, can require long-term
maintenance to ensure integrity and contin-
ued performance. Upon completion and veri-
fication of cleanup goals, reinstitute your
original or modified ground-water monitor-
ing program if the unit is still in active use.
3. No Further Action and Site
Closure
When the corrective action goals have
been achieved, and monitoring and site
maintenance are no longer necessary to
ensure that this condition persists, reinstitute
your original or modified ground-water mon-
itoring program if the unit is still in active
use. It might be necessary, however, to ensure
that any selected institutional controls remain
in place. Refer to Chapter 11-Performing
Closure and Post-Closure Care for additional
information on site closures.
10-22
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Taking Corrective Action Activity List
Consider the following when developing a corrective action program for industrial waste management
units:
Q Locate the source(s) of the release(s) of contaminants and determine the extent of the contamina-
tion.
Q Consult with the state, community representatives, and qualified remedial experts when develop-
ing a corrective action program.
Q Identify and evaluate all potential corrective measures including interim measures.
Q Select and implement corrective measures based on the effectiveness and protectiveness of the
remedy, the ease of implementing the remedy, and the degree that the remedy meets local commu-
nity concerns and all applicable state laws.
Q Design a program to monitor the maintenance and performance of corrective measures to ensure
that human health and the environment are being protected.
10-23
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Resources
ASTM. 1997. Standard Provisional Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action (PS104). February.
ASTM. 1994. Emergency Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites.
May.
Louisiana Department ol Environmental Quality. 2000. Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP)
June.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). 1999. Texas Risk Reduction Program, Title 30
Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 350.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). 1995. TNRCC Technical Guidance: Selecting an
Environmental Consultant/Corrective Action Specialist. February.
U.S. EPA. 2002. Draft Superlund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook. OSWER 9285.7-50.
U.S. EPA. 200la. Development ola Data Evaluation: Decision Support System for Remediation ol Subsurface
Contamination. EPA600-R-01-044.
U.S. EPA. 200Ib. Development ol Recommendations and Methods to Support Assessment olSoil Venting
Performance and Closure. EPA600-R-01-070.
U.S. EPA. 200Ic. Evaluation olthe Protocol lor Natural Attenuation ol Chlorinated Solvents: Case Study at
the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant. EPA600-R-01-025.
U.S. EPA. 2001d.Handbook ol Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for RCRA Corrective Action.
EPA530-R-01-015.
U.S. EPA. 200le. Multispecies Reactive Tracer Test in a Sand and Gravel Aquifer, Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
Parts I-II. EPA600-R-01-007a-b.
U.S. EPA. 20011. Summary olthe Phytoremediation State olthe Science Conference, Boston Massachusetts,
May 1-2, 2000. EPA625-R-01-001a.
U.S. EPA. 2000a. Abstracts ol Remediation Case Studies. Volume 4. EPA542-R-00-006.
U.S. EPA. 2000b. Statistical Estimation and Visualization ol Ground-Water Contamination Data. EPA600-R-
00-034.
10-24
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Resources (cont.)-
U.S. EPA. 1999a. Groundwater Cleanup: Overview of Operating Experience at 28 Sites. EPA542-R-99-
006.
U.S. EPA. 1999b. In Situ Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Treatment of Hexavalent Chromium and
Trichloroethylene in Ground Water: Volume 1 Design and Installation. EPA600-R-99-095a.
U.S. EPA. 1999c. In Situ Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Treatment of Hexavalent Chromium and
Trichloroethylene in Ground Water: Volume 2 Performance Monitoring. EPA600-R-99-095b.
U.S. EPA. 1999d. In Situ Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Treatment of Hexavalent Chromium and
Trichloroethylene in Ground Water: Volume 3 Multicomponent Reactive Transport Modeling. EPA600-R-
99-095c.
U.S. EPA. 1999e. Laser Fluorescence EEM Probe for Cone Penetrometer Pollution Analysis. EPA600-R-99-
041.
U.S. EPA. 1998a. Application of the Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter. EPA600-R-98-058.
U.S. EPA. 1998b. Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation. EPA600-R-98-
125.
U.S. EPA. 1998c. Technical Protocol for Evaluating natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground
Water, EPA600-R-98-128.
U.S. EPA. 1996a. A Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment Technologies. EPA542-F-96-001.
U.S. EPA. 1996b. Corrective Action for Releases from Solid Waste Management Units at Hazardous Waste
Management Facilities: Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Fed. Reg. 61(85): 19,431- 19,464. May 1.
U.S. EPA. 1996c. Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation: A Guide for Decision-Makers and
Practitioners. EPA625-R-95-005.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies. EPA542-R-95-001.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Groundwater Treatment Technology Resource Guide. EPA542-B-94-009.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Physical/chemical Treatment Technology Resource Guide. EPA542-B-94-008.
10-25
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Taking Corrective Action
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1994c. RCRA Corrective Action Plan. EPA520-R-94-004.
U.S. EPA. 1994d. Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment Technology Resource Guide. EPA542-B-94-007.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Bioremediation Resource Guide. EPA542-B-93-004.
U.S. EPA. 1992a. A Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA. EPA540-R-92-071.
U.S. EPA. 1992b. RCRA Corrective Action Stabilization Technologies Proceedings. EPA625-R-92-014.
U.S. EPA. 199 la. Handbook: Remediation of Contaminated Sediments. EPA625-6-91-028.
U.S. EPA. 199 Ib. Handbook: Stabilization Technologies for RCRA Corrective Action. EPA625-6-91- 026.
U.S. EPA. 199 Ic. Site Characterization for Subsurface Remediation. EPA625-4-91-026.
U.S. EPA. 1989a. RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance: Volume I: Development of an RFI Work Plan and
General Considerations for RCRA Facility Investigations. PB89-200-299.
U.S. EPA. 1989b. RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance: Volume II: Soil, Ground Water, and Subsurface Gas
Releases. PB89-200-299.
U.S. EPA. 1989c. RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance: Volume III: Air and Surface Water Releases. PB89-
200-299.
U.S. EPA. 1989d. RCRA Facility Investigation Guidance: Volume IV: Case Study Examples. PB89-200-299.
U.S. EPA. 1989e. Seminar Publication: Corrective Action: Technologies and Applications. EPA625-4-89-020.
U.S. EPA. 1989f. Practical Guide for Assessing and Remediating Contaminated Sites: Draft.
U.S. EPA. 1988a. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA.
Interim Final. EPA540-G-89-004.
U.S. EPA. 1988b. RCRA Corrective Action Interim Measures Guidance - Interim Final. EPA530-SW-88-029.
U.S. EPA. 1986. RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance. PB87-107769.
10-26
-------
Part V
Ensuring Long-Term Protection
Chapter 11
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
-------
-------
Contents
I. Closure Plans 11- 1
II. Selecting a Closure Method 11- 3
III. Closure by Use of Final Cover Systems 11- 4
A. Purpose and Goal of Final Cover Systems 11- 4
B. Technical Considerations for Selecting Cover Materials 11- 5
C. Components of a Final Cover 11-8
D. Capillary-Break Final Covers 11-16
E. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model 11- 17
F Recommended Cover Systems 11- 18
IV Closure by Waste Removal 11-21
A. Establishing Baseline Conditions 11- 22
B. Removal Procedures 11- 22
C. Disposal of Removed Wastes 11-23
D. Final Sampling and Analysis 11- 23
V Post-Closure Care Considerations When Final Cover Is Used 11- 24
A. Maintenance 11- 24
B. Monitoring During Post-Closure Care 11- 25
C. Recommended Length of the Post-Closure Care Period 11- 25
D. Closure and Post-Closure Cost Considerations 11-26
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care Activity List 11- 34
Resources 11-35
Tables:
Table 1: Types of Layers in Final Cover Systems 11- 9
Table 2: Types of Recommended Final Cover Systems 11- 18
Table 3: Example Closure/Post-Closure Cost Estimate Form 11- 27
Table 4: Sample Summary Cost Estimating Worksheet 11- 29
Table 5: Estimated Closure and Post-Closure Care Costs 11- 31
Figures:
Figure 1: Regional Depth of Frost Penetration in Inches 11 - 6
Figure 2: Drainage Layer Configuration 11 - 11
-------
Contents (cont.)
Figure 3: Geonet with Geotextile Filter Design for Drainage Layer 11 - 12
Figure 4: Passive Gas Venting System 11 - 15
Figure 5: Active Gas Venting System 11 - 15
Figure 6: Example of a Capillary-Break Final Cover System 11-17
Figure 7: Recommended Final Cover System For a Unit With a Double Liner or a Composite Liner ....11 - 19
Figure 8: Recommended Final Cover System For a Unit With a Single Clay Liner 11 - 19
Figure 9: Recommended Final Cover System For a Unit With a Single Clay Liner in an Arid Area 11 - 20
Figure 10: Recommended Final Cover System For a Unit With a Single Synthetic Liner 11 -20
Figure 11: Recommended Final Cover System For a Unit With a Natural Soil Liner 11-21
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
This chapter will help you:
• Provide closure and post-closure care as an integral part of a
unit's overall design and operation.
• Provide long-term environmental protection by reducing or elimi-
nating potential threats and the need for potential corrective
action at the site.
• Plan and accomplish the goals of closure and post-closure care by
requiring that adequate funding be set aside to cover the
planned costs of closure and post-closure care.
The overall goal of closure is to
minimize or eliminate potential
threats to human health and the
environment and the need for
future corrective action at the site.
If removing the wastes, containment devices,
and any contaminated subsoils from a unit,
the unit should be returned to an acceptable
risk level so that it is not a current or future
threat. If wastes will be left in place at clo-
sure, the unit should be closed in a manner
that also reduces and controls current or
future threats. Steps should also be taken to
avoid future disruptions to final cover sys-
tems and monitoring devices.
This chapter will help address the follow-
ing questions.
• How do I develop a closure plan?
• What factors should I consider when
choosing a closure method?
• What are the components of a final
cover?
• What costs are associated with post-
closure care?
For post-closure care, the overall goal is to
minimize the infiltration of water into a unit
by providing maintenance of the final cover.
Maintenance should be continued until such
time as it is determined that care is no longer
necessary. Also, during post-closure care,
closed units should be monitored to verify
and document that no unacceptable releases
are occurring.
I. Closure Plans
A well-conceived closure plan is the pri-
mary resource document for the final stage in
the life of a waste management unit. The pur-
pose of a closure plan is to consider all
aspects of the closure scenario. It should be
comprehensive so that staff who will imple-
ment it years after its writing will clearly
understand the activities it specifies. It also
needs to provide enough detail to allow cal-
culation of closure and post-closure care costs
for determining how much funding needs to
be set aside for those activities.
11-1
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
What should be considered when
developing a closure plan?
You should tailor a closure plan to account
for the unique characteristics of the unit, the
waste managed in the unit, and anticipated
future land use. Each unit will have different
closure activities. Closing a surface impound-
ment, for example, involves removal of
remaining liquids and solidifying sludges
prior to placing a final cover on the unit.
The following information is important to
consider when developing a closure plan:
• Overall goals and objectives of closure.
• Future land use.
• Type of waste management unit.
• Types, amount, and physical state of
waste in the unit.
• Constituents associated with the wastes.
• Whether wastes will be removed or
left in place at closure.
• Schedule (overall and interim).
• Costs to implement closure.
• Steps to monitor progress of closure
actions, including inspections, mainte-
nance, and monitoring (e.g., ground-
water and leachate monitoring).
• Health and safety plans, as necessary.
• Contingency plans.
• Description of waste treatment or sta-
bilization (if applicable).
• Final cover information (if applicable).
• Vegetation management.
• Run-on and runoff controls.
• Closure operations and maintenance.
• Erosion prevention and repair.
• Waste removal information (if applica-
ble).
• Parameters to assess performance of
the unit throughout the post-closure
period.
The plan should address the types of waste
that have been or are expected to be deposited
in the management unit and the constituents
that can reasonably be associated with those
wastes. The types of expected wastes will
affect both the design of the final cover and
the types of activities that should be undertak-
en during the post-closure care period.
Biodegradable waste, for example, can cause a
final cover to subside due to decomposition
and can also require gas management.
The closure plan should provide other
information that will address the closure strat-
egy. If, for instance, a final cover is planned,
then the closure plan should consider season-
al precipitation that could influence the per-
formance of both the cover and the
monitoring system. Information concerning
freeze cycles and the depth of frost perme-
ation will provide supporting information
with which to assess the adequacy of the
cover design. Similarly, arid conditions should
be addressed to support a decision to use a
particular cover material, such as cobbles.
The closure plan should address the closure
schedule, stating when closure is expected to
begin, and when closure is expected to be com-
pleted. You should consider starting closure
when the unit has reached capacity or has
received the last expected waste for disposal.
For units containing inorganic wastes, you
should complete closure as soon as possible
after the last expected waste has been received.
A period of 180 days is a good general guide
for completing closure, but the actual time
frame will be dictated by site-specific condi-
tions. For units receiving organic wastes, more
time might be needed for the wastes to stabilize
11-2
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
prior to completing closure. Similarly, other
site-specific conditions, such as precipitation
or winter weather, can also cause delay in
completing closure. For these situations, you
should complete closure as soon as feasible.
You should also consult with the state agency
to determine if any requirements exist for clo-
sure schedules.
Even within a waste management unit,
some areas will be closed on different sched-
ules, with certain areas in partial closure,
while other areas continue to operate. The
schedules and partial closure activities (such
as intermediate cover) should be considered
in the closure plan. Although the processes
for closing such areas might not be different
than those for closing the unit as a whole, it
is still more efficient to integrate partial clo-
sure activities into the closure plan.
If the closure plan calls for the stabiliza-
tion, solidification, or other treatment of
wastes in the unit before the installation of a
final cover, the plan should describe those
activities in detail. Waste stabilization, solidi-
fication, or other treatment has four goals:
• Removing liquids, which are ill-suit-
ed to supporting the final cover.
• Decreasing the surface area over
which the transfer or escape of conta-
minants can occur.
• Limiting the solubility of leachable
constituents in the waste.
• Reducing toxicity of the waste.
For closure strategies that will use engi-
neering controls, such as final covers, the plan
should provide detailed specifications. This
includes descriptions of the cover materials in
each layer and their permeability as well as
any drainage and/or gas migration control
measures included in the operation of the
final cover. Also the plan should identify mea-
sures to verify the continued integrity of the
final cover and the proper operation of the gas
migration and/or drainage control strategies.
If wastes will be removed at closure, the clo-
sure plan should estimate volumes of waste and
contaminated subsoil and the extent of contam-
inated devices to be removed during closure. It
should further state waste removal procedures,
establish performance goals, and address any
state or local requirements for closure by waste
removal. The plan should identify numeric
clean-up standards and existing background
concentrations of constituents. It also should
discuss the sampling plan for determining the
effectiveness of closure activities. Finally, it
should describe the provisions made for the dis-
posal of removed wastes and other materials.
The closure plan should also provide a
detailed description of the monitoring that
will be conducted to assess the unit's perfor-
mance throughout the post-closure period.
These measurements include monitoring
leachate volume and characteristics to ensure
that a cover is minimizing infiltration. It is
important to include appropriate ground-
water quality standards with which to com-
pare ground-water monitoring reports. You
should develop the performance measures
section of the plan prior to completing clo-
sure. This section establishes the parameters
that will describe successful closure of the
unit. If limits on these parameters are exceed-
ed, it will provide an early warning that the
final cover system is not functioning as
designed and that measures should be under-
taken to identify and correct problems.
II. Selecting a
Closure Method
Factors to consider in deciding whether to
perform closure by means of waste removal
or through the use of a final cover include the
following:
11-3
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
• Feasibility. Is closure by waste
removal feasible? For example, if the
waste volumes are large and underlying
soil and ground water are contaminat-
ed, closure by total waste removal
might not be possible. If the unit is
contaminated, consult Chapter
10-Taking Corrective Action to identify
activities to address the contamination.
In some cases partial removal of the
waste might be useful to remove the
source of ground-water contamination.
• Cost-effectiveness. Compare the cost
of removing waste, containment
devices, and contaminated soils, plus
subsequent disposal costs at another
facility, to the cost of installing a final
cover and providing post-closure care.
• Long-term protection. Will the final
cover control, minimize, or eliminate
post-closure escape of waste con-
stituents or contaminated runoff to
ground or surface waters to the extent
necessary to protect human health and
the environment?
• Availability of alternate site. Is an
alternate site available for final dispos-
al or treatment of removed waste? You
should consult with the state agency
to determine whether alternate dispos-
al sites are appropriate.
Sections III and V address closure by use of
final cover systems and associated post-closure
care considerations. Alternatively, Section IV
addresses closure by waste removal.
Closure by Use
of Final Cover
Systems
You might elect to close a waste manage-
ment unit by means of a final cover system.
This approach is common for landfill units and
some surface impoundment units where some
waste is left in place. The choice of final cover
materials and design should be the result of a
careful review and consideration of all site-spe-
cific conditions that will affect the performance
of the cover system. If you are not knowledge-
able about the engineering properties of cover
materials, you should seek the advice of profes-
sionals or representatives of state and local
environmental protection agencies.
This section addresses the more important
technical issues that should be considered
when selecting cover materials and designing a
cover system. It discusses the various potential
components of final cover systems, including
the types of materials that can be used in their
design and some of the advantages and disad-
vantages of each. This section also examines
the interaction between the various compo-
nents as they function within the system.
A. Purpose and Goal of
Final Cover Systems
The principal goals of final cover systems
are to:
• Provide long-term environmental pro-
tection of human health and the envi-
ronment by reducing or eliminating
potential risk of contaminant release.
• Minimize infiltration of precipitation
into the waste management unit to
minimize generation of leachates with-
in the unit by promoting surface
drainage and maximizing runoff.
• Minimize risk by controlling gas migra-
tion (as applicable), and by providing
physical separation between waste and
humans, plants, and animals.
• Minimize long-term maintenance needs.
The final cover should be designed to pro-
vide long-term protection and minimization of
11-4
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
leachate formation. Final cover systems can
be inspected, managed, and repaired to main-
tain long-term protection. For optimal perfor-
mance, the final cover system should be
designed to minimize infiltration, surface
ponding, and the erosion of cover material.
To avoid the accumulation of leachate within
a unit, the cover system should be no more
permeable than the liner system. For exam-
ple, if a unit's bottom liner system is com-
posed of a low-permeability material, such as
compacted clay or a geomembrane, then the
cover should also be composed of a low-per-
meability material unless an evaluation of
site-specific conditions shows an equivalent
reduction in infiltration. If the cover system is
more permeable than the liner, leachate will
accumulate in the unit. This buildup of liq-
uids within a unit is often referred to as the
"bathtub effect." In addition, since many
units can potentially generate gas, cover sys-
tems should be designed to control gas
migration. Proper quality assurance and qual-
ity control during construction and installa-
tion of the final cover are essential in order to
ensure that the final cover performs in accor-
dance with its design. For general informa-
tion on quality assurance during construction
of the final cover, refer back to the construc-
tion quality assurance section of Chapter 7,
Section B-Designing and Installing Liners.
Recommendations for the type of final cover
system to use will depend on the type of liner
and the gas and liquids management strategy
employed in a unit.
B. Technical Considerations
for Selecting Cover
Materials
Several environmental and engineering con-
cerns can affect cover materials and should be
considered in the choice of those materials.
How can climate affect a final
cover?
Freeze and thaw effects can lead to the
development of micro fractures in low perme-
ability soil layers. These effects also can cause
the realignment of interstitial fines (silts and
clays), thereby increasing the hydraulic con-
ductivity of the final cover. As a result, you
should determine the maximum depth of
frost penetration at a site and design covers
accordingly. In other words, barrier layers
should be below the maximum frost penetra-
tion depth. Information regarding the maxi-
mum frost penetration depth for a particular
area can be obtained from the Natural
Resource Conservation Service with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, local utilities,
construction companies, local universities, or
state agencies. Figure 1 illustrates the regional
depth of frost penetration. You should ensure
that vegetation layers are thick enough that
low permeability soil layers in the final cover
are placed below the maximum frost penetra-
tion depth.
How can settlement and subsi-
dence affect a final cover?
When waste decomposes and consolidates,
settlement and subsidence can result.
Excessive settlement and subsidence can sig-
nificantly impair the integrity of the final
cover system by causing ponding of water on
the surface, fracturing of low permeability
infiltration layers, and failure of geomem-
branes. The degree and rate of waste settle-
ment are difficult to estimate, but they should
be considered during design and development
of closure plans. Waste settlement should also
be considered when determining the timing of
closure. Steps should be taken to minimize
the degree of settlement that will occur after
the final cover system has been installed.
11-5
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Figure 1. Regional Depth of Frost Penetration in Inches
Source: U.S. EPA, 1989a.
How can erosion affect the per-
formance of a final cover?
Erosion can adversely affect the perfor-
mance of the final cover of a unit by causing
rills that require maintenance and repair.
Extreme erosion can lead to the exposure of
the infiltration layer, initiate or contribute to
sliding failures, or expose the waste.
Anticipated erosion due to surface-water
runoff for a given design criteria can be
approximated using the USDA Universal Soil
Loss Equation1 (U.S. EPA, 1989a). By evaluat-
ing erosion loss, you might be able to opti-
mize the final cover design to reduce
maintenance through selection of the best
available soil materials. A vegetative cover not
only improves the appearance of a unit, but it
also controls erosion of the final cover.
The vegetation components of the erosion
layer should have the following characteristics:
• Locally adapted perennial plants that
are resistant to various climatic
changes reasonably expected to occur
at the site.
• Roots that will not disrupt the low-
permeability layer.
• The ability to thrive in low-nutrient
soil with minimum nutrient addition.
• The ability to survive and function
with little or no maintenance.
Why are interfacial and internal
friction properties for cover com-
ponents important?
Adequate friction between cover compo-
nents, such as geomembrane barrier layers
and soil drainage layers, as well as between
any geosynthetic components, is needed to
prevent extensive slippage or interfacial shear.
Water and ice can affect the potential for
11-6
USDA Universal Soil Loss Equation: X = RKLSCP where: X = Soil loss (tons/acre/year); R = Rainfall ero-
sion index; K = Soil erodibility index; L = Slope length factor; S = Slope gradient factor; C = Crop man-
agement factor; P = Erosion control practice. For minimal long-term care X < 2.0 tons/acre/year.
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
cover components to slip. Sudden sliding can
tear geomembranes or cause sloughing of
earthen materials. Internal shear can also be a
concern for composite or geosynthetic clay
liner materials. Measures to improve stability
include using flatter slopes or textured
geosynthetic membranes, geogrids designed
to resist slipping forces, otherwise reinforcing
the cover soil, and providing drainage.
Can dry soil materials affect a
final cover?
Desiccation, the natural drying of soil
materials, can have an adverse affect on the
soil layers compromising the final cover.
Although this process is most commonly
associated with layers of low permeability
soil, such as clay, it can cause problems with
other soil types as well. Desiccation causes
cracks in the soil surface extending down-
ward. Cover layers are not very thick, and
therefore these cracks can extend through an
entire layer, radically changing its hydraulic
conductivity or permeability. Care should be
taken to detect desiccation at an early stage in
time to mitigate its damage. Also, the tenden-
cy for final covers to become dry makes root
penetration even more of a problem in that
plants respond to drought by extending their
root systems downward.
Can plants and animals have an
effect on a final cover?
When selecting the plant species to
include in the vegetative cover of a waste
management unit, you should consider the
potential for root systems to grow through
surface cover layers and penetrate underlying
drainage and barrier layers. Such penetration
will form preferential pathways for water
infiltration and compromise the integrity of
the final cover system. Similarly, the presence
of burrowing animals should be foreseen
when designing the final cover system. Such
animals can burrow in the surface layers and
can potentially breach the underlying barrier
layer. Strategies for mitigating the effects
described here are discussed below in the
context of protection layers composed of
gravel or cobbles.
Is it necessary to stabilize wastes?
Before installing a final cover, liquid or
semi-liquid wastes might need to be stabi-
lized or solidified. Stabilization or solidifica-
tion might be necessary to allow equipment
on the unit to install the final cover or to
ensure adequate support, or bearing capacity,
for the final cover. With proper bulk cover
technique, it might be feasible to place the
cover over a homogeneous, gel-like, semi-liq-
uid waste. When selecting a stabilization or
solidification process, it is important to con-
sider the effectiveness of the process and its
compatibility with the wastes. Performance
specifications for stabilization or solidification
processes include leachability free-liquid con-
tent, physical stability, bearing capacity, reac-
tivity, ignitability biodegradability strength,
permeability, and durability of the stabilized
and solidified waste. You should consider
seeking professional assistance to properly
stabilize or solidify waste prior to closure.
Where solidification is not practical, you
should consider reinforcement and construc-
tion of a specialized lighter weight cover sys-
tem over unstable wastes. This involves using
combinations of geogrids, geotextiles,
geonets, geosynthetic clay liners, and
geomembranes. For more detail on this prac-
tice, consult references such as the paper by
Robert P. Grefe, Closure ofPapermill Sludge
Lagoons Using Geosynthetics and Subsequent
Performance, and the Geosynthetic Research
Institute proceedings, Landfill Closures:
Geosynthetics Interface Friction and New
Developments, cited in the Resources section.
11-7
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
How can wastes be stabilized?
Many stabilization and solidification
processes require the mixing of waste with
other materials, such as clay, lime, and ash.
These processes include either sorbents or
encapsulating agents. Sorbents are nonreac-
tive and nonbiodegradable materials that soak
up free liquids to form a solid or near-solid
mass. Encapsulating agents enclose wastes to
form an impermeable mass. The following are
examples of some commonly used types of
waste stabilization and solidification methods.
• Cement-based techniques. Portland
cement can use moisture from the
waste (sludge) for cement hydration.
The end product has high strength,
good durability, and retains waste
effectively.
• Fly ash or lime techniques. A com-
bination of pozzolanic fly ash, lime,
and moisture can form compounds
that have cement-like properties.
• Thermoplastic techniques. Asphalt,
tar, polyolefins, and epoxies can be
mixed with waste, forming a semi-
rigid solid after cooling.
• Organic polymer processes. This
technique involves adding and mixing
monomer with a sludge, followed by
adding a polymerizing catalyst. This
technique entraps the solid particles.
After evaluating and selecting a stabilization
or solidification process, you should conduct
pilot-scale tests to address issues such as safe-
ty, mix ratios, mix times, and pumping prob-
lems. Testing will help assess the potential for
an increase in waste volume. It will also help
to plan the production phase, train operators,
and devise construction specifications.
When conducting full-scale treatment
operations, options exist for adding and mix-
ing materials. These options might include in
situ mixing and mobile plant mixing. In situ
mixing is the simplest technique, using com-
mon construction equipment, such as back-
hoes, excavators, and dump trucks. In situ
mixing is most suitable where large amounts
of materials are added to stabilize or solidify
the waste. The existing waste management
area, such as a surface impoundment, can be
used as the mixing area. The in situ mixing
process is open to the atmosphere, so envi-
ronmental and safety issues, such as odor,
dust, and vapor generation, should be taken
into consideration. For mobile plant mixing,
wastes are removed from the unit, mechani-
cally mixed with treatment materials in a
portable processing vessel, and deposited
back into the unit. Mobile plant mixing is
generally used for treating sludges and other
wastes with a high liquid content.
C. Components of a Final
Cover
Cover systems can be designed in a variety
of ways to accomplish closure goals. This
flexibility allows a final cover design system
to integrate site-specific technical considera-
tions that can affect performance. This section
discusses the potential components or layers
of a final cover system, their functions, and
appropriate materials for each layer. Since the
materials used in cover systems are the same
as those used in liner systems, refer to
Chapter 7, Section B-Designing and
Installing Liners for a more detailed discus-
sion of the engineering properties of the vari-
ous materials.
Table 1 presents the types of layers and
typical materials that might exist in a final
cover. The minimum appropriate thicknesses
of each of the five types of layers depends
upon many factors including site drainage,
erosion potential, slopes, types of vegetative
cover, type of soil, and climate.
11-8
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Table 1
Types of Layers in Final Cover Systems
Layer Type of Layer Typical Materials
1
2
3
4
5
Surface (Erosion, Vegetative Cover)
Layer
Protection Layer
Drainage Layer
Barrier (Infiltration) Layer
Foundation/Gas Collection Layer
Topsoil, Geosynthetic Erosion Control Layer,
Cobbles
Soil, Recycled or Reused Waste Materials, Cobbles
Sand and/or Gravel, Geonet or Geocomposite,
Chipped or Shredded Tires
Compacted Clay, Geomembrane, Geosynthetic Clay
Liner
Sand or Gravel, Soil, Geonet or Geotextile,
Recycled or Reused Waste Material
Source: Jesionek et al., 1995
What function does the surface
layer serve?
The role of the surface layer in the final cover
system is to promote the growth of native, non-
woody plant species, minimize erosion, restore
the aesthetics of the site, and protect the barrier
layer. The surface layer should be thick enough
so that the root systems of the plants do not
penetrate the underlying barrier layer. The vege-
tation on the surface layer should be resistant to
drought and temperature extremes, able to sur-
vive and function with little maintenance, and
also be able to maximize evapotranspiration,
which will limit water infiltration to the barrier
layer. It is recommended that you consult with
agriculture or soil conservation experts concern-
ing appropriate cover vegetation. Finally, the
surface layer should be thick enough to with-
stand long-term erosion and to prevent desicca-
tion and freeze/thaw effects of the barrier layer.
The recommended minimum thickness for the
surface layer is at least f 2 inches. The state
agency can help to determine the appropriate
minimum thickness in cold climates to protect
against freeze-thaw effects.
What types of materials can be
used in the surface layer?
Topsoil has been by far the most common-
ly used material for surface layers. The princi-
pal advantages of using topsoil in the surface
layer include its general availability and its
suitability for sustaining vegetation. When top-
soil is used as a surface layer, the roots of
plants will reinforce the soil, reduce the rate of
erosion, decrease runoff, and remove water
from the soil through evapotranspiration. To
achieve these benefits, however, the soil
should have sufficient water-holding capacity
to sustain plant growth. There are some con-
cerns with regard to using topsoil. For exam-
ple, topsoil requires ongoing maintenance,
especially during periods of drought or heavy
rainfall. Prolonged drought can lead to crack-
ing in the soil, creating preferential pathways
for water infiltration. Heavy rainfall can lead to
erosion causing rills or gullies, especially on
newly-seeded or steeply sloping covers. If the
topsoil does not have sufficient water holding
capacity, it can not adequately support surface
plant growth, and evapotranspiration can
11-9
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
excessively dry the soils. In this case, irrigation
will be required to restore the water balance
within the soil structure. Topsoil is also vulner-
able to penetration by burrowing animals.
Geosynthetic erosion control material can
be used as a cover above the topsoil to limit
erosion prior to the establishment of a mature
vegetative cover. The geosynthetic material can
include embedded seeds to promote plant
growth, and can be anchored or reinforced to
add stability on steeply sloped areas.
Geosynthetic material, however, does not
enhance the water-holding capacity of the soil.
In arid or semi-arid areas, therefore, the soil
might still be prone to wind and water erosion
if its water-holding capacity is insufficient.
Cobbles can be a suitable material for the
surface layer in arid areas or on steep slopes
which might hinder the establishment of veg-
etation. If they are large enough they will
provide protection from wind and water ero-
sion without washout. Cobbles can also pro-
tect the underlying barrier layer from
intrusion by burrowing animals, but cobbles
might not be available locally, and their use
does not protect the underlying barrier layer
from water infiltration. Because cobbles create
a porous surface through which water can
percolate, they do not ordinarily support veg-
etation. Wind-blown soil material can fill
voids between cobbles, and plants can estab-
lish themselves in these materials. This plant
material should be removed, as its roots are
likely to extend into the underlying barrier
layer in search of water.
What function does the protec-
tion or biotic barrier layer serve?
A protection or biotic barrier layer can be
added below the surface layer, but above the
drainage layer, to protect the latter from
intrusion by plant roots or burrowing ani-
mals. This layer adds depth to the surface
layer, increasing its water storage capacity
and protecting underlying layers from freez-
ing and erosion. In many cases, the protec-
tion layer and the surface layer are combined
to form a single cover layer.
What types of materials can be
used in the protection layer?
Soil will generally be the most suitable
material for this layer, except in cases where
special design requirements exist for the pro-
tection layer. The advantages and disadvan-
tages of using soil in the protection layer are
the same as those stated above in the discus-
sion of the surface layer topsoil. Factors
impacting the thickness and type of soil to use
as a protection layer include freeze and thaw
properties and the interaction between the soil
and drainage layers. Other types of materials
that can be used in the protection layer
include cobbles with a geotextile filter, gravel
and rock, and recycled or reused waste.
Cobbles with a geotextile filter can form
a good barrier against penetration by plant
roots and burrowing animals in arid sites.
The primary disadvantage is that cobbles
have no water storage capacity and allow
water percolation into underlying layers.
Gravel and rock are similar to cobbles
since they can form a good barrier against
penetration by plant roots and burrowing ani-
mals. Again, this use is usually only consid-
ered for arid sites, because gravel and rocks
have no water storage capacity and allow
water percolation into underlying layers.
Recycled or reused waste materials such
as fly ash and bottom ash can be used in the
protection layer, when available. Check with
the state agency to verify that use of these
11-10
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
materials is allowable. The advantages of
using these materials in the protection layer
are that they store water that has infiltrated
past the surface layer, which can then be
returned to the surface through evapotrans-
piration, and that they offer protection
against burrowing animals and penetration by
roots. If planning to use waste material in the
protection layer, consider its impact on sur-
face runoff at the unit's perimeter. Design
controls to ensure runoff does not contribute
to surface-water contamination. Consult
Chapter 6-Protecting Surface Water for more
details on designing runoff controls.
What function does the drainage
layer serve?
A drainage layer can be placed below the
surface layer, but above the barrier layer, to
direct infiltrating water to drainage systems at
the toe of the cover (see Figure 2) or to inter-
mittent benches on long steep slopes. For
drainage layers, the thickness will depend on
the level of performance being designed and
the properties of available materials. For
example, some geonet composites, with a
thickness of less than 1 inch, have a transmis-
sivity equal to a much thicker layer of aggre-
gate or sand. The recommended thickness of
the high permeability soil drainage layer is 12
inches with at least a 3 percent slope at the
bottom of the layer. Based on standard prac-
tice, the drainage layer should have a
hydraulic conductivity in the range of 1O2 to
1O3 cm/sec. Water infiltration control through
a drainage layer improves slope stability by
reducing the duration of surface and protec-
tion layer saturation. In this role, the drainage
layer works with vegetation to remove infil-
trating water from the cover and protect the
underlying barrier layer. If this layer drains
the overlying soils too well, it could lead to
the need for irrigation of the surface layer to
avoid desiccation.
Figure 2. Drainage Layer Configuration
geomembrino aneft-ors
far
o
%ŁQc?
^o^
4
WIEU
Source: U.S. EPA, 1991.
11-11
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Another consideration for design of
drainage layers is that the water should dis-
charge freely from the toe of the cover or inter-
mittent benches. If outlets become plugged or
are not of adequate capacity the toe of the
slope can become saturated and potentially
unstable. In addition, when designing the
drainage layer, you should consider using flex-
ible corrugated piping in conjunction with
either the sand and gravel or the gravel with
geotextile filter material to facilitate the move-
ment of water to the unit perimeter.
What materials can be used in
the drainage layer?
Sand and gravel are a common set of
materials used in the drainage layer. The
principal consideration in their use is the
hydraulic conductivity required by the overall
design. There can be cases in which the
design requires the drainage of a large
amount of water from the surface layer, and
the hydraulic properties of the sand and grav-
el layer might be insufficient to meet these
requirements. The advantages of using sand
and gravel in the drainage layer include the
ability to protect the underlying barrier layer
from intrusion, puncture, and temperature
extremes. The principal disadvantage to these
materials is that they are subject to intrusions
from the overlying protective layer that can
alter their hydraulic conductivity. Similarly
fines in the sand and gravel can migrate
downslope, undermining the stability of the
cover slope. A graded filter or a geotextile fil-
ter can be used to separate and protect the
sand and gravel from intrusions by the over-
lying protection layer.
Gravel with a geotextile filter is also a
widely-used design, whose applicability can
be limited by the local availability of materi-
als. The gravel promotes drainage of water
from the overlying layers, while the geotextile
filter prevents the clogging of granular
drainage layers. Again, be aware of the possi-
bility that a gravel drainage layer might drain
overlying soils so well that irrigation of the
surface layer might become necessary. The
principal advantage to a gravel/geotextile
drainage layer is the engineering community's
considerable body of knowledge regarding
their use as drainage materials. Other advan-
tages include their ability to protect underly-
ing layers from intrusion, puncture,
temperature extremes, and their common
availability. The geotextile filter provides a
cushion layer between the gravel and the
overlying protection layer.
Figure 3.
Geonet with Geotextile Filter Design
for Drainage Layer
COVERS
Source: U.S. EPA, 1991.
Geonet and geotextile filter materials can
be used to form an effective drainage layer
directly above a compacted clay or geomem-
brane liner (see Figure 3). They are a suitable
alternative especially in cases where other
materials, such as sand and gravel, are not
locally available. The principal advantage is
that lightweight equipment can be used
during installation, reducing the risk of dam-
aging the underlying barrier layer.
The disadvantages associated with geonet
and geotextile materials are that they provide
little protection for the barrier layer against
extreme temperature changes, and there can
be slippage between the interfaces between
the geomembrane, geotextile, and low perme-
11-12
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
ability soil barrier materials. The use of tex-
tured materials can be considered to address
slippage. Furthermore, problems can arise in
the horizontal seaming of the geotextile
drainage layer on long slopes.
Chipped or shredded tires are an addi-
tional option for drainage layer materials.
Chipped or shredded tires have been used for
bottom drainage layers in the past and might
be suitable for cover drainage layers as well.
One caution concerning the use of chipped
or shredded tires is possible metal contami-
nants, or pieces of metal that could damage a
geomembrane liner. You should consult with
the state agency to determine whether this
option is an acceptable practice.
What function does the barrier
layer serve?
The barrier layer is the most critical com-
ponent of the cover system because it pre-
vents water infiltration into the waste. It also
indirectly promotes the storage and drainage
of water from the overlying protection and
surface layers, and it prevents the upward
movement of gases. This layer will be the least
permeable component of the final cover sys-
tem. Typically, the hydraulic conductivity of a
barrier layer is between 1O9 to 1O7 cm/sec.
What types of materials can be
used in the barrier layer?
Single compacted clay liners (CCLs) are
the most common material used as barrier
layers in final cover systems. CCL popularity
arises largely because of the local availability
of materials and the engineering community's
extensive experience with their use. Drying
and subsidence are the primary difficulties
posed by CCLs. When the clay dries, cracks
appear and provide preferential pathways
along which water can enter the waste, pro-
moting leachate formation, waste decomposi-
tion, and gas formation (when methane
producing waste is present). Dry waste mater-
ial and gas formation within the unit con-
tribute to drying from below, while a range of
climatological conditions, including drought,
can affect CCLs from above. Even with
extremely thick surface and protection layers,
CCLs can still undergo some desiccation.
Clay liners are also vulnerable to subsi-
dence within the waste unit. This problem
can first manifest itself during liner construc-
tion. As the clay is compacted with machin-
ery, the waste might not provide a stable,
even foundation for the compaction process.
This will make it difficult to create the evenly
measured lifts comprising the liner. As waste
settles over time, depressions can form along
the top of the CCL. These depressions put
differential stresses on the liner, causing
cracks which compromise its integrity. For
instance, a depression of only 5 to 11 inches
across a 6-foot area can be sufficient to crack
the liner materials.
Single geomembrane liners are sheets of
a plastic polymer combined with other ingre-
dients to form an effective barrier to water
infiltration. Such liners are simple and
straightforward to install, but they are rela-
tively fragile and can be easily punctured
during installation or by movement in surface
layer materials. The principal advantage of a
geomembrane is that it provides a relatively
impermeable barrier with materials that are
generally available. It is not damaged by tem-
perature extremes and therefore does not
require a thick surface layer. The geomem-
brane is more flexible than clay and not as
vulnerable to cracking as a result of subsi-
dence within the unit. The principal disad-
vantage is that it provides a point of potential
slippage at the interface with the cover soils.
Such slippage can tear the geomembrane,
even if it is anchored.
Single geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs)
are composed of bentonite clay supported by
11-13
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
geotextiles or geomembranes held together
with stitching or adhesives. These liners are
relatively easy to install and have some self-
healing capacity for minor punctures. They
are easily repaired by patching. The main dis-
advantages include low shear strength, low
bearing capacity vulnerability to puncture
due to relative thinness, and potential for
slippage at interfaces with under- and overly-
ing soil materials. When dry, their permeabil-
ity to gas makes GCLs unsuitable as a barrier
layer for wastes that produce gas, unless the
clay will be maintained in a wet state for the
entire post-closure period.
Geomembrane with compacted clay lin-
ers (CCLs) can be used to mitigate the short-
comings of each material when used alone. In
this composite liner, the geomembrane acts to
protect the clay from desiccation, while pro-
viding increased tolerance to differential set-
tlement within the waste. The clay acts to
protect the geomembrane from punctures and
tearing. Both components act as an effective
barrier to water infiltration. The principal dis-
advantage is slippage between the geomem-
brane and surface layer materials.
Geomembrane with geosynthetic clay lin-
ers (GCLs) can also be used as a barrier layer.
As with geomembrane and CCL combinations,
each component serves to mitigate the weak-
ness of the other. The geosynthetic material is
less vulnerable than its clay counterpart to
cracking and has a moderate capacity to self-
heal. The geomembrane combined with the
GCL is a more flexible cover and is less vulner-
able to differential stresses from waste settle-
ment. Neither component is readily affected by
extreme temperature changes, and both work
together to form an effective barrier layer. For
more information on the properties of geosyn-
thetic clay liners, including their hydration
after installation, refer to Chapter 7, Section
B-Designing and Installing Liners. The poten-
tial disadvantage is slippage between the upper
and lower surfaces of the geomembrane and
some types of GCL and other surface layer
materials. The geomembrane is still vulnerable
to puncture, so placement of cover soils is
important to minimize such damage.
Textured geomembranes can be used to
increase the stability of cap side slopes.
Textured geomembranes are nearly identical
to standard "smooth" geomembranes differing
only in the rough or textured surface that has
been added. This textured surface increases
the friction between the liner and soils and
other geosynthetics used in the cap, and can
help prevent sliding failures. In general, tex-
tured geomembranes are more expensive than
comparable "smooth" geomembranes.
Using textured geomembranes allows cap
designers to employ steeper slopes which can
increase the available airspace in a waste
management unit, and therefore increase its
capacity. Textured geomembranes also help
keep cover soil in place improving overall
liner stability on steep slopes. The degree to
which textured geomembranes will improve
frictional resistance (friction coefficients/fric-
tion angles) will vary from site-to-site
depending upon the type of soil at the site
and its condition (e.g., moisture content).
Textured geomembranes are manufactured
by two primary methods. Some textured
geomembranes have a friction coating layer
added to standard "smooth" geomembranes
through a secondary process. Others are tex-
tured during the initial production process,
meaning textured layers are coextruded as
part of the liner itself. Textured geomem-
branes can be textured on one or both sides.
Textured geomembranes are seam-welded
by the same technologies as standard
geomembranes. Due to their textured surface,
however, seam welds can be less uniform
with textured liners than with normal liners.
Some textured geomembranes have smooth
edges on the top and bottom of the sheet to
allow for more uniform seam welding.
11-14
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
soil
vent
What function does the gas col-
lection layer serve?
The role of the gas collection layer is to
control the migration of gases to collection
vents. This collection layer is a permeable
layer that is placed above the foundation
layer. It is often used in cases where the foun-
dation layer itself is not the gas collection
layer. For more information on Clean Air Act
requirements for managing gas from landfills
and other waste management units, refer to
Chapter 5-Protecting
Air Quality. Figure
Gas control systems
generally include mech-
anisms designed to con-
trol gas migration and
to help vent gas emis-
sions into the atmo-
sphere. Systems using
natural pressure and
convection mechanisms
are referred to as passive
gas control systems (see
Figure 4). Examples of
passive gas control sys-
tem elements include
ditches, trenches, vent
walls, perforated pipes
surrounded by coarse
soil, synthetic mem-
branes, and high mois-
ture, fine-grained soil.
Systems using mechani-
cal means to remove gas
from the unit are
referred to as active gas
control systems. Figure
5 illustrates an active
gas system. Gas control
systems can also be
used as part of correc-
tive action measures
should the concentra-
tion of methane rise to dangerous levels. As
with all aspects of a waste containment sys-
tem, construction quality assurance plays a
critical role in the success of a gas manage-
ment system.
Gas extraction wells are an example of
active gas control systems. For deep wells,
the number, location, and extent of the pipe
perforations are important. Also, the depth of
the well must be kept safely above the liner
system beneath the waste. For continuous gas
4. Passive Gas Venting System
gas vent
• ••••••••••••••11
gas flare
T T T
• • • •••••••
Source: Robinson, W, ed. 1986. The Solid Waste Handbook: A Practical
Guide. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Figure 5. Active Gas Venting System
gas monitoring probe
installed in refuse
monitoring
probe
installed
in surrounding
ground
Source: Robinson, W, ed. 1986. The Solid Waste Handbook: A Practical
Guide. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11-15
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
collection layers beneath the barrier layer,
continuity is important for both soils and
geosynthetics.
Knowing the rate of gas generation is
essential to determining the quantity of gas
that can be extracted from the site. Pumping
an individual well at a greater vacuum will
give it a wider zone of influence, which is
acceptable, but obviously there are points of
diminishing marginal returns. Larger suction
pressures influence a larger region but
involve more energy expended in the pump-
ing. Pumping at greater vacuum also increas-
es the potential for drawing in atmospheric
air if the pumping rate is set too high.
Significant air intrusion into the unit can
result in elevated temperatures and even
underground fires. You should perform rou-
tine checks of gas generation rates to better
ensure that optimal pumping rates are used.
The performance of gas extraction systems
is affected by the following parameters,
which should be considered when designing
and operating gas systems:
• Daily cover, which inhibits free
movement of gas.
• Sludge or liquid wastes, which affect
the ease at which gas will move.
• Shallow depth of unit, which makes
it difficult to extract the gas, because
atmospheric air will be drawn in
during the pumping.
• Permeability of the final cover, which
affects the ability of atmospheric air
to permeate the wastes in the unit.
What types of materials can be
used in the gas collection layer?
Sand and gravel are the most common
materials used for gas collection layers. With
these materials, a filter might be needed to
prevent infiltration of materials from the bar-
rier layer. Geotextile and geosynthetic
drainage composites also can make suitable
gas collection layers. In many cases, these can
be the most cost-effective alternatives. The
same disadvantages exist with these materials
in the gas collection layer as in other layers,
such as slippage and continuity of flow.
With a geomembrane in the final cover
barrier system, uplift pressures will be exert-
ed unless the gas is quickly and efficiently
conveyed to the wells, vents, or collection
trenches. If this is not properly managed,
uplift pressure will either cause bubbles to
occur, displacing the cover soil and appear-
ing at the surface, or decrease the normal
stress between the geomembrane and its
underlying material. This problem has led to
slippage of the geomembrane and all overly-
ing materials creating high tensile stresses
evidenced by folding at the toe of the slope
and tension cracks near the top.
D. Capillary-Break Final
Covers
The capillary-break (CB) approach is an
alternative design for a final cover system
(see Figure 6). This system relies on the fact
that for adjacent layers of fine- and coarse-
textured material to be in water-potential
equilibrium, the coarse-grained material
(such as crushed stone) will tend to have a
much lower water content than the fine-
grained material (such as sand). Because the
conductivity of water through a soil decreases
exponentially with its water content, as a soil
becomes more dry, its tendency to stay dry
increases. Therefore, as long as the strata in a
capillary break remain unsaturated (remain
above the water table), the overlying fine-tex-
tured soil will retain nearly all the water and
the coarse soil will behave as a barrier to
water percolation due to its dryness. Since
this phenomenon breaks down if the coarse
layer becomes saturated, this alternative
11-16
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
cover system is most appropriate for semiarid
and desert environments.
What types of materials are used
in capillary-break covers?
The CB cover system typically consists of
five layers: surface, storage, capillary-break,
barrier, and foundation. The surface, barrier,
and foundation layers play the same role in
the cover system as described above. The
storage layer consists of fine material, such as
silty sand. The capillary-break, or coarse,
layer consists of granular materials, such as
gravel and coarse sand. A fabric filter is often
placed between the coarse and fine layers.
E. The Hydrologic
Evaluation of Landfill
Performance (HELP)
Model
The relative performance of various cover
designs can be evaluated with the Hydrologic
Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP)
model, developed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Waterway Experiment Station for
EPA. The HELP model was designed specifi-
cally to support permit writers and engineers
in evaluating alternative landfill designs, but
it can also be used to evaluate various final
cover designs.
The HELP model integrates runoff, perco-
lation, and subsurface-water flow actions into
one model. The model can be used to esti-
mate the flow of water across and through a
final cover. To achieve this, the HELP model
uses precipitation and other climatological
information to partition rainfall and snow
melt into surface runoff, evaporation, and
downward infiltration through the barrier
layer to the waste.
The HELP model essentially divides a
waste management unit into layers, each
Figure 6. Example of a Capillary-Break Final
Cover System
Adapted from
defined in terms of soil type, which is related
to the hydraulic conductivity of each. Users
fill in data collection sheets that request spe-
cific information on the layers and climate,
and this information is input to the model. In
performing its calculations, the model will
take into account the reported engineering
properties of each layer, such as slope,
hydraulic conductivity, and rates of evapo-
transpiration, to estimate the amount of pre-
cipitation that can enter the waste unit
through the final cover. To use the HELP
model properly, refer to the HELP Model
User's Guide and documentation (U.S. EPA,
1994b; U.S. EPA, 1994c). The model itself,
the User's Guide, and supporting documenta-
tion can be obtained from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Web site at
.
11-17
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
F. Recommended Cover
Systems
The recommended final cover systems cor-
respond to a waste management unit's bot-
tom liner system. A unit with a single
geomembrane bottom liner system, for exam-
ple, should include, at a minimum, a single
geomembrane in its final cover system unless
an evaluation of site-specific conditions can
show an equivalent reduction in infiltration.
Table 2 summarizes the minium recommend-
Table 2: Minimum Recommended Final Cover Systems"
Type of Bottom Liner Recommended Cover System Thickness Hydraulic Conductivity
Layers (From top layer down)" (In inches) (In cm/sec)
Double Liner
Composite Liner
Single Clay Liner
Single Clay Liner in
an Arid Area
Single Synthetic Liner
Natural Soil Liner
Surface Layer
Drainage Layer
Geomembrane
Clay Layer
Surface Layer
Drainage Layer
Geomembrane
Clay Layer
Surface Layer
Drainage Layer
Clay Layer
Cobble Layer
Drainage Layer
Clay Layer
Surface Layer
Drainage Layer
Geomembrane
Clay Layer
Earthen Material
12
12b
30mil(PVC)
60mil (HOPE)
18
12
12b
30 mil (PVC)
60 mil (HOPE)
18
12
12b
18
2-4
12b
18
12
12b
30 mil (PVC)
60 mil (HOPE)
18
24C
not applicable
IxlO-2 to IxlO-3
less than IxlO"5
not applicable
IxlO-2 to IxlO-3
less than IxlO"5
not applicable
IxlO-2 to IxlO-3
less than IxlO"7
not applicable
IxlO-2 to IxlO-3
less than IxlO"7
not applicable
IxlO-2 to IxlO-3
less than IxlO-5
No more permeable than
base soil
* Please consult with your state regulatory agency prior to constructing a final cover.
" The final selection of geomembrane type, thickness, and drainage layer requirements for a final cover
should be design-based and consultation with your state agency is recommended.
b This recommended thickness is for high permeability soil material with at least a 3 percent slope at the
bottom of the layer. Some geonet composites, with a minimal thickness of less than 1 inch, have a
transmissivity equal to a much thicker layer of aggregate or sand.
c Thickness might need to be increased to address freeze/thaw conditions.
11-18
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
ed final cover systems based on the unit's hot- addition, you should consider whether to
torn liner system. While the recommended include a protection layer or a gas collection
minimum final cover systems include closure layer. Figures 7 through 11 display recom-
layer component thicknesses and hydraulic mended minimum final cover systems.
conductivity the cover systems can be modi-
fied to address site-specific conditions. In
Figure 7. Recommended Final Cover System for a Unit With a Double or Composite Liner
12-iflch
12-tncn Surface Layer
Layer
13- ncn C-ay Layer
1 * i
Figure 8. Recommended Final Cover System for a Unit With a Single Clay Liner
12-inch Surface Laytr
12-inch Qrmagg Layer
{1 i lO4 c*rv's«e ml .< 1
1 B-incti Clay Bamsr Laysr
(maximum 1 x 1 Cr* erv we)
11-19
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Figure 9. Recommended Final Cover System for a Unit With a Single Clay Liner in an Arid Area
2- ig 4-'^ch Cobble
tar iJnncfi
12 -inch Drainage Layer
* 1(J
13*ir»Ch C
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Figure 11. Recommended Final Cover System for a Unit With a Natural Soil Liner
^if**24-inch Earthen Material
Layer
(no more permeable than
base soil)
While these recommendations include the
use of compacted clay, a facility manager
might want to consider the use of a geomem-
brane barrier layer in addition to, or in place
of, a compacted clay barrier layer. Subsidence
of a final cover constructed with a compacted
clay barrier layer can allow precipitation to
enter the closed unit and increase leachate
production. The use of a geomembrane in
place of compacted clay might be more cost
effective. Due to cracking or channeling or
continued subsidence, post-closure care of a
compacted clay barrier layer can be more
expensive to maintain than a geomembrane
barrier layer. A geomembrane barrier layer
can also accommodate more subsidence with-
out losing its effectiveness.
IV. Closure by
Waste Removal
Closure by waste removal is a term that
describes the removal and decontamination
of all waste, waste residues, contaminated
ground water, soils, and containment devices.
This approach is common for waste piles and
some surface impoundments. Removal and
decontamination are complete when the con-
stituent concentrations throughout the unit
and any areas affected by releases from the
unit do not exceed numeric cleanup levels.
You should check with the state agency to see
if it has established any numeric cleanup lev-
els or methods for establishing site-specific
levels. In the absence of state cleanup levels,
metals and organics should be removed to
either statistically equivalent background lev-
els or to maximum contaminant levels
(MCLs) or health-based numbers (HBNs)2.
Metals and organics might have different
cleanup levels, but they both should be based
on either local background levels or on
health-based guidelines.
Future land use considerations can also be
important in determining the appropriate
level of cleanup. One tool that can be used to
help evaluate whether waste removal is
appropriate at the site is the risk-based cor-
rective action (RBCA) process described in
Chapter f 0-Taking Corrective Action. The
RBCA process provides guidance on integrat-
ing ecological and human health risk-based
decision-making into the traditional correc-
tive action process.
To learn about the regulatory and technical basis for MCLs, access the Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS), a database of human health effects that can result from exposure to environmental contaminants,
at . Call the EPA Risk Information Hotline at 513 569-7254 for more information.
11-21
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
A. Establishing Baseline
Conditions
A good management practice is to establish
the baseline conditions for a waste manage-
ment unit. Baseline conditions include the
background constituent concentrations at a
site prior to waste placement operations.
Identifying the types of contaminants that
might be present can provide an indication of
the potential contamination resulting from the
operation of a unit and the level of effort and
resources that can be required to reach clo-
sure. Naturally-occurring elevated background
levels that are higher than targeted closure lev-
els might be encountered. In such cases, con-
sult with the state agency to determine
whether these elevated background levels are a
more appropriate targeted cleanup level. The
identification of potential contaminants will
also provide a guideline for selecting sampling
parameters. If constituents other than those
initially identified are discovered through sub-
sequent soil and water sampling, this might
indicate that contaminants are migrating from
another source.
In some cases, waste contaminants might
have been present at a site before a waste
management unit was constructed, or they
might have migrated to the site from another
unrelated source. In these situations, closure
by waste removal can still proceed, provided
that any contamination originating from the
closing unit is removed to appropriate
cleanup levels. You should determine whether
additional remediation is required under
other federal or state laws, such as the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), or state cleanup laws.
How are baseline conditions
established?
Initial soil and ground-water sampling
around, within, and below a unit will serve
to identify baseline conditions. Sampling can
detect contaminant levels that exceed back-
ground levels or federal, state, or local
health-based benchmarks. Contact local envi-
ronmental protection officials for guidance on
the number and type of samples that should
be taken. If the initial round of sampling
does not reveal any contaminant levels that
exceed benchmarks, you should proceed
with the removal of waste and the restoration
of the unit. If the sampling does reveal conta-
mination that exceeds the benchmarks, you
should consider ways to remediate the site in
compliance with federal, state, or local
requirements.
B. Removal Procedures
Proper removal procedures are vital to the
long-term, post-closure care of a unit and
surrounding land. Properly removing waste
can minimize the need for further mainte-
nance, thereby saving time and money and
facilitating reuse of the land. You should per-
form closure by waste removal in a manner
that prevents the escape of waste constituents
to the soil, surface water, ground water, and
atmosphere. After removing the waste, you
should remove all equipment, liners, soils,
and any other materials containing waste or
waste residues. Removal verification should
include specifics as to how it will be deter-
mined that residues, equipment, liners, and
soils have been removed to baseline condi-
tions. Finally, the land should be returned to
the appearance and condition of surrounding
land areas to the extent possible consistent
with the closure and post-closure plans.
11-22
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Should a plan for waste removal
procedures be prepared?
The waste removal process should be fully
described in a closure plan. The removal
process description should address estimates
of the volumes and types of waste and conta-
minated equipment or structures to be
removed during closure. It should also
include the types of equipment to be used,
the removal pattern, and the management of
loading areas. The closure plan should also
detail steps to be taken to minimize and pre-
vent emissions of waste during closure activi-
ties. For example, if activities during closure
include loading and transporting waste in
trucks, the closure plan should describe the
steps that will be taken to minimize air emis-
sions from windblown dust. Proper quality
assurance and quality control during the
waste removal process will help ensure that
the removal proceeds in accordance with the
waste removal plan. A key component of the
waste removal procedure is the consideration
of proper disposal or treatment methods for
any wastes or contaminated materials.
C. Disposal of Removed
Wastes
When a unit is closed by removing waste,
waste residues, contaminated ground water,
soils, and containment devices, you should
ensure that disposal of these materials is in
compliance with state law. If the composition
of the waste can not be determined using
process knowledge, you should test it using
procedures such as those described in Chapter
2-Characterizing Waste. Then consult with the
state agency to determine which requirements
might apply to the waste.
D. Final Sampling and
Analysis
The purpose of final sampling and analysis
is to ensure that target cleanup levels have
been achieved. While initial sampling is
intended to establish baseline levels of conta-
minants, final sampling is used more as a
safeguard to make sure levels have not
changed. It is important to conduct a final
sampling, in addition to the initial sampling,
because removal actions can increase the con-
taminant levels at the site, and sometimes
contamination is overlooked in the initial
baseline sampling event. Refer to Chapter
9-Monitoring Performance for a detailed dis-
cussion of sampling and analysis procedures.
How should the sampling data
be used?
The results of this sampling event should
be compared to the results of the baseline
event, and any discrepancies should be
noted. The results can be compared to per-
formance measures established at the begin-
ning of the closure process with state or local
regulators. Closure plans incorporating waste
removal should include a sampling and
analysis plan for the initial and final sampling
and analysis efforts. The plan should specify
procedures to ensure that sample collection,
handling, and analysis will result in data of
sufficient quality to plan and evaluate closure
activities. The sampling and analysis plan
should be designed to define the nature and
extent of contamination at, or released from,
the closing unit. The level of detail in the
sampling and analysis plan should be com-
mensurate with the complexity of conditions
at the closing unit.
11-23
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
V. Post-Closure Care
Considerations
When Final
Cover Is Used
For units that will close with a final cover,
the following factors should be considered:
• Routine maintenance of the unit's sys-
tems, including the final cover,
leachate collection and removal sys-
tems, run-on and runoff controls, gas
and ground-water monitoring sys-
tems, and surface-water and gas qual-
ity monitoring where appropriate.
• The names and telephone numbers
of facility personnel for emergencies.
• Mechanisms to ensure the integrity of
the final cover system, such as posted
signs or notifications on deeds.
• The anticipated uses of the property
during the post-closure period.
• The length of the post-closure care
period.
• Costs to implement and conduct
post-closure care.
• Conditions that will cause post-clo-
sure care to be extended or shortened.
A. Maintenance
After the final cover is installed, some
maintenance and repair likely will be neces-
sary to keep the cover in good working con-
dition. Maintenance can include mowing the
vegetative cover periodically and reseeding, if
necessary. Repair the cover when erosion or
subsidence occurs. Maintaining healthy vege-
tation will ensure the stability of slopes,
reduce surface erosion, and reduce leachate
production by increasing evapotranspiration.
A regular schedule for site inspections of
maintenance activities during the post-closure
period, as well as prompt repair of any prob-
lems found at inspection, can help ensure the
proper performance of the cover system.
Maintenance of the proper thickness of sur-
face and drainage layers can ensure long-term
minimization of leachate production and pro-
tection of geomembranes, if present.
What maintenance and repair
activities should be conducted
after the final cover has been
installed?
In the case of damage to the final cover,
you should determine the cause of damage so
that proper repair measures can be taken to
prevent recurrence. For example, if the dam-
age is due to erosion, potential causes might
include the length and steepness of slopes,
insufficient vegetation growth due to poor
planting, or uneven settlement of the waste.
Sedimentation basins and drainage swales
should be inspected after major storms and
repaired or cleaned, as necessary.
Components of the leachate collection and
removal system, such as leachate collection
pipes, manholes, tanks, and pumps should
also receive regular inspection and mainte-
nance. If possible, flush and pressure-clean
the collection systems on a regular basis to
reduce sediment accumulation and to pre-
vent clogging caused by biological growth.
The manholes, tanks, and pumps should be
visually inspected at least annually, and
valves and manual controls should be exer-
cised even more frequently, because leachate
can corrode metallic parts. Repairs will help
prevent future problems, such as leachate
overflow from a tank due to pump failure.
You should inspect and repair gas and
ground-water monitoring wells during the
post-closure period. Proper operation of
11-24
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
monitoring wells is essential to determine
whether releases from a closed waste manage-
ment unit are occurring. For example,
ground-water monitoring wells should be
inspected to ensure that they have not been
damaged by vehicular traffic or vandalism.
Physical scraping or swabbing might be nec-
essary to remove biological clogging or
encrustation from calcium carbonate deposits
on well screens.
B. Monitoring During Post-
Closure Care
Post-closure care monitoring should
include the leachate collection system, sur-
face-water controls, the ground-water moni-
toring system where appropriate, and gas
controls where appropriate. Post-closure
monitoring will serve as your main source of
information about the integrity of the final
cover and liners. A reduction in the intensity
(i.e., frequency) and scope of monitoring
might be warranted after some period of time
during post-closure care. Conversely, an
increase in intensity and scope might become
necessary due to unanticipated problems.
What should be considered when
monitoring post-closure leachate,
ground water, and gas?
The quantity of leachate generated should
be monitored, as this is a good indicator of
the performance of the closure system. If the
closure system is effective, the amount of
leachate generated should decrease over time.
In addition, the concentration of contami-
nants in leachate should, in time, reach an
equilibrium. An abrupt decline in the conta-
minant concentration could mean that the
cover has failed, and surface water has
entered the waste and diluted the leachate.
To ensure leachate has not contaminated
ground-water supplies, you should sample
ground water regularly. Regular ground-water
monitoring detects changes, or the lack there-
of, in the quality of ground water. For a more
detailed discussion, consult Chapter 9-
Monitoring Performance.
As no cover system is impermeable to gas
migration, and if gas production is a concern
at the unit, you should install gas monitoring
wells around the perimeter of the unit to
detect laterally moving gas. If geomembranes
are used in a cover, more gas can escape lat-
erally than vertically. Gas collection systems
can also become clogged and stop performing
properly. Therefore, you should periodically
check gas vents and flush and pressure-clean
those vents not working properly.
C. Recommended Length
of the Post-Closure Care
Period
The overall goal of post-closure care is to
provide care until wastes no longer present a
threat to the environment. Threats to the envi-
ronment during the post-closure care period
can be evaluated using leachate and ground-
water monitoring data to determine whether
there is a potential for migration of waste con-
stituents at levels that might threaten human
health and the environment. Ground-water
monitoring data can be compared to drinking
water standards or health-based criteria to
determine whether a threat exists.
Leachate volumes and constituent concen-
trations can also be used to show that the
unit does not pose a threat to human health
and the environment. The threats posed by
waste constituents in leachate should be eval-
uated based on the potential release of
leachate to ground and surface waters.
Consequently, you should consider doing
post-closure care maintenance for as long as
11-25
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
that potential exists. Individual post-closure
care periods can be long or short depending
on the type of waste being managed, the
waste management unit, and a variety of site-
specific characteristics. You should contact
the appropriate state agency to determine
what post-closure period it recommends. In
the absence of any state guidance on the
appropriate length of the post-closure period,
consider a minimum of 30 years.
D. Closure and Post-Closure
Cost Considerations
The facility manager of a closed industrial
unit is responsible for that unit. To ensure
long-term protection of the environment, you
should account for the costs of closure and
post-closure care when making initial plans.
There are guidance documents available to
help plan for the costs associated with closing
a unit. For example, guides produced by the
R.S. Means Co. provide up-to-date cost esti-
mates for most construction-related work,
such as moving soil, and material and labor
for installing piping. Table 3 also presents an
example of a closure/post-closure cost esti-
mate form. Table 4 presents a sample summa-
ry cost estimating worksheet to assist in
determining the cost of closure. Also you
should consider obtaining financial assurance
mechanisms so that the necessary funds will
be available to complete closure and post-clo-
sure care activities if necessary. Financial
assurance planning encourages internalization
of the future costs associated with waste man-
agement units and promotes proper design
and operating practices, because the costs for
closure and post-closure care are often less
for units operated in an environmentally pro-
tective manner. You should check with the
state agency to determine whether financial
assurance is required and what types of
financial assurance mechanisms might be
acceptable.
The amount of financial assurance that
might be necessary is based on site-specific
estimates of the costs of closure and post-clo-
sure care. The estimates should reflect the
costs that a third party would incur in con-
ducting closure and post-closure activities.
This recommendation ensures adequate funds
will be available to hire a third party to carry
out necessary activities. You should consider
updating the cost estimates annually to
account for inflation and whenever changes
are made to the closure and post-closure
plans. For financial assurance purposes, if a
state does not have a regulation or guidance
regarding the length of the post-closure care
period, 30 years could be used as a planning
tool for developing closure and post-closure
cost estimates.
Financial assurance mechanisms do not
force anyone to immediately provide full
funding for closure and post-closure care.
Rather, they help to ensure the future avail-
ability of such funds. For example, trust
funds can be built up gradually during the
operating life of a waste management unit. By
having an extended "pay-in" period for trust
funds, the burden of funding closure and
post-closure care will be spread out over the
economic life of the unit. Alternatively, con-
sider the use of a corporate financial test or
third-party alternative, such as surety bonds,
letters of credit, insurance, or guarantees.
What costs can be expected to
be associated with the closure of
a unit?
The cost of constructing a final cover or
achieving closure by waste removal will
depend on site-specific activities. You should
consider developing written cost estimates
before closure procedures begin. For closure
by means of a final cover, the cost of con-
structing the final cover will depend on the
complexity of the cover profile, final slope
11-26
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Table 3: Example Closure/Post-Closure Cost Estimate Form* (All Costs Shown in ($000)
Provisions Total Closure Total Post- Total Closure/
Costs Yrs. ( - ) Closure Costs Post-Closure
Yrs. ( - ) Costs Yrs. ( - )
i Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
ii Final Cover
iii Final Cover Vegetation
iv Maintenance Program for Final Cover and
Final Cover Vegetation
v Maintenance Program for Side Slopes
vi Run-On and Runoff Control Program
vii Maintenance Program for Run-On and Runoff
Control System
viii Ground-water Monitoring Wells
ix Maintenance Program for Ground-water
Monitoring Wells
x Ground-water Monitoring
xi Methane Gas Venting or Evacuation System
xii Maintenance Program for Methane Gas
Venting or Evacuation System
xiii Leachate Collection and/or Control System
xiv Maintenance Program for Leachate Collection
and/or Control System
xv Facility Access Control System
xvi Maintenance Program for Facility Access
Control System
xvii Measures to Conform the Site to
Surrounding Area
xviii Maintenance Program for Site Conformance
Measures
xix Construction Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
TOTAL COSTS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
* Developed from New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Landfill Engineering
Landfill Permits.
11-27
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Table 3: Example Closure/Post-Closure Cost Estimate Form (Cont'd)
Provisions Total Post- Year Year Year Year Year Year Year
Closure Costs #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
i Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan
ii Final Cover
iii Final Cover Vegetation
iv Maintenance Program for Final Cover
and Final Cover Vegetation
v Maintenance Program for Side Slopes
vi Run-On and Runoff Control Program
vii Maintenance Program for Run-On
and Runoff Control System
viii Ground-water Monitoring Wells
ix Maintenance Program for Ground-
water Monitoring Wells
x Ground-water Monitoring
xi Methane Gas Venting or Evacuation
System
xii Maintenance Program for Methane
Gas Venting or Evacuation System
xiii Leachate Collection and/or Control
System
xiv Maintenance Program for Leachate
Collection and/or Control System
xv Facility Access Control System
xvi Maintenance Program for Facility
Access Control System
xvii Measures to Conform the Site to
Surrounding Area
xviii Maintenance Program for Site
Conformance Measures
xix Construction Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
TOTAL COSTS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11-28
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Table 4: Sample Summary Cost Estimating Worksheet
Summary Worksheet for Landfills
Activity
Some of the activities listed below are routine. The owner or operator
might elect or be required to conduct additional activities. Italic type
denotes worksheets for estimating the costs of those additional activities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Installation of Clay Layer
Installation of Geomembrane
Installation of Drainage Layer
Installation of Topsoil
Establishment of Vegetative Cover
Installation of Colloid Clay Liner
Installation of Asphalt Cover
Decontamination
Sampling and Analysis
Monitoring Well Installation
Transportation
Treatment and Disposal
Subtotal of Closure Costs (Add lines 1 through 12)
Worksheet
Number
LF-3
LF-4
LF-5
LF-6
LF-7
LF-8
LF-9
DC-1
SA-2
MW-1
TR-1
TD-1
Engineering Expenses (Engineering expenses are typically 10% of closure
costs, excluding survey plat, certification of closure, and post-closure care.)
Survey Plat
Certification of Closure
LF-10
LF-11
Subtotal (Add engineering expenses and cost of the survey plat, certification of
closure, and post-closure care to closure costs [Add lines 12 through 16])
Contingency Allowance (Contingency allowances are typically 20% of closure costs,
engineering expenses, cost of survey plat, cost of certification of closure, and
post- closure care.)
Post-Closure Care
PC-1
TOTAL COST OF CLOSURE (Add lines 17, 18, and 19)
Cost
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Worksheet generated from CostPro©: Closure and Post-Closure Cost Estimating Software. Available from
Steve Jeffords of Tetra Tech EM Inc., 404 225-5514, or 285 Peach Tree Center Avenue, Suite 900,
Atlanta, GA, 30303.
11-29
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
contours of the cover, whether the entire unit
will be closed (or partial closures), and other
site-specific factors. For example, the compo-
nents of the final cover system, such as a gas-
vent layer or a biotic layer, will affect costs. In
addition, closure-cost estimates would also
include final-cover vegetation, run-on and
runoff control systems, leachate collection
and removal systems, ground-water monitor-
ing wells, gas-monitoring systems and con-
trols, and access controls, such as fences or
signs. Closure costs might also include con-
struction quality assurance costs, engineering
fees, accounting and banking fees, insurance,
permit fees, legal fees, and, where appropri-
ate, contingencies for cost overruns, reworks,
emergencies, and unforeseen expenses.
For closure by means of waste removal,
closure costs would include the costs of
removal procedures, decontamination proce-
dures, and sampling and analysis. Closure
cost estimates should also consider the costs
for equipment to remove all waste, transport
it to another waste management unit, and
properly treat or dispose of it. In addition,
fugitive dust emission controls, such as dust
suppression practices, might need to be
included as a closure cost. Table 5 presents
example estimates of average closure costs for
typical closure activities. It also presents esti-
mates of typical post-closure care costs dis-
cussed in more detail below.
What costs can be expected to be
associated with post-closure care?
After a waste management unit is closed,
you should conduct monitoring and mainte-
nance to ensure that the closed unit remains
secure and stable. Consider the costs to con-
duct post-closure care and monitoring for
some period of time, such as 30 years (in the
absence of a state regulation or guidance). If a
unit is successfully closed by means of waste
removal, no post-closure care costs would be
expected. Post-closure care costs should
include both annual costs, such as monitor-
ing, and periodic costs, such as cap or moni-
toring well replacement.
For units closed by means of a final cover,
you should consider the costs for a mainte-
nance program for the final cover and associ-
ated vegetation. The more frequent the timing
of the maintenance activities, the greater your
post-closure care costs will be. This program
might include repair of damaged or stressed
vegetation, and maintenance of side slopes.
Costs to maintain the run-on and runoff con-
trol systems, leachate collection and removal
systems, and ground-water and gas monitor-
ing wells should also be expected. In addi-
tion, sampling, analysis, and reporting costs
should be factored into the post-closure cost
estimates. See Table 5 above for estimates of
post-closure care costs.
Post-closure costs should be updated
annually as a record of actual unit costs is
developed. Some costs, such as erosion con-
trol and ground-water sampling, might be
reduced over time as the vegetation on the
cover matures and a meaningful amount of
monitoring data is accumulated. Due to site-
specific conditions, a shorter or longer post-
closure period might be determined to be
appropriate.
How can long-term financial
assurance for a unit be obtained?
Different examples of financial assurance
mechanisms include trust funds, surety bond,
insurance, guarantee, corporate guarantees,
and financial tests. Trust funds are a method
whereby cash, liquid assets, certificates of
deposit, or government securities are deposit-
ed into a fund controlled by a trustee, or state
agency. The trust fund amount should be such
that the principal plus accumulated earnings
over the projected life of the waste manage-
ment unit would be sufficient to pay closure
11-30
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Table 5. Example Estimated Closure and Post-Closure Care Costs
Closure Activity Cost Estimate
Estimated average total landfill closure cost
Complete site grading
Landfill capping
Total (all capping materials & activities)
Compacted clay cap
Geosynthetic clay liner cap
Leachate collection and treatment
Reclamation of area (applying 2.5 feet of top soil and seeding)
Install ground-water monitoring wells
Install methane monitoring wells (if applicable)
Install perimeter fence
Repair/replace perimeter fence
Construct surface-water structures
$4,000,000 '
$l,222/acre2
$80,000 -$100, 0007 acre3
$5.17/cubic yard of clay 2
$16,553/acre2
$0.05-$0.15/gallon3
$0.25/gallon 2
$10,200/acre3
$2,400/well4
$l,300/well4
$13/lmearfoot4
$2.20/linear foot2
$l/lmearfoot4
Post-Closure Activity Cost Estimate
(based on 30 year post-closure care period)
Estimated average total landfill post-closure care cost
Conduct annual inspections
Maintain leachate collection systems
Conduct Post-closure ground-water monitoring
(sampling and analysis)
Conduct methane monitoring
Maintain perimeter fence
Maintain surface-water structures
Remove perimeter fence (at end of post-closure care period)
$1,000,000 '
$22,000/facility/year 4
$15,000/facility/year 2
$60,000 2
$15,000-$25,000/year3
$12,000/well4
$7,200/well 4
$12/lmearfoot4
$ I/linear foot4
$2/linear foot 4
1 ICE Incorporated. Memo to Dale Ruhter, September 11, 1996
ICF's data show that total closure and post-closure care costs are dependent upon the size of the landfill.
The size ranges and corresponding cost estimates were used to calculate the estimated average total costs.
11-31
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Notes for Table 5
Subtitle D Landfill Closure Costs
Size Range Cost
(tons per day) (in 2000 dollars)
50-
126
276
564
-125
-275
-563
- 1125
$2,700,000
$5,100,000
$8,300,000
$11,800,000
Subtitle D Landfill Post-Closure Care Costs
Size Range Cost
(tons per day) (in 2000 dollars)
50 -
126
276
564
- 125
-275
-563
-1125
$820,000
$980,000
$1,400,000
$1,700,000
2 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. Table 5.2 Closure Cost Estimate and Table 5.3 Post
Closure Estimate from Chapter 5 of Solid Waste Financial Assurance Program Report. December 2000.
3 Jeffrey H. Heath "Landfill Closures: Balancing Environmental Protection with Cost," MSW Management.
January/February 1996. pp. 66-70.
4 Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Solid and Hazardous Waste Division. Solid Waste
Guideline #12: Participation in the State Trust Account. May 1994.
and post-closure care costs. Surety bond,
insurance, and guarantee are methods to
arrange for a third party to guarantee pay-
ment for closure and post-closure activities if
necessary. A financial test is a standard, such
as an accounting ratio, net worth, bond rat-
ing, or a combination of these standards, that
measures the financial strength of a firm. By
passing a financial test, it is determined that
one has the financial strength to pay for clo-
sure and post-closure costs.
A more detailed explanation of these
examples and other potential financial assur-
ance mechanisms is provided below. These
mechanisms can be used individually or in
combination. This Guide, however, does not
recommend specific, acceptable, financial
assurance mechanisms.
• Trust funds. A trust fund is an
arrangement in which one party, the
grantor, transfers cash, liquid assets,
certificates of deposit, or government
securities into a fund controlled by a
special "custodian," the trustee, who
manages the money for the benefit of
one or more beneficiaries. The trust
fund should be dedicated to closure
and post-closure care activities.
Payments are made annually into the
fund so that the full amount for clo-
sure and post-closure care accumu-
lates before closure and post-closure
care activities start. A copy of the
trust agreement, which describes
how the funds will be used to pay for
closure and post-closure care activi-
ties, should be placed in the waste
management unit's operating record.
Surety bond. A surety bond guaran-
tees performance of an obligation,
such as closure and post-closure
care. A surety company is an entity
that agrees to answer for the debt or
default of another. Payment or per-
formance surety bonds are acceptable
in the event an owner or operator
fails to conduct closure and post-clo-
sure care activities. If you use a sure-
ty bond or letter of credit, you
should establish a standby trust fund
(essentially the same as a trust fund).
11-32
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
In most cases, a standby trust fund is
established with an initial nominal
fee agreed to by the owner or the
operator and the trustee. Further
payments into this fund are not
required until the standby trust is
funded by a surety company. The
surety company should be listed as
an acceptable surety in Circular 570
of the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Letters of credit. A letter of credit is
a formalized line of credit from a
bank or another institution on behalf
of an owner or operator. This agree-
ment states that it will make available
to a beneficiary such as a state, a spe-
cific sum of money during a specific
time period. The letter of credit
should be irrevocable and issued for
1 year. The letter of credit should
also establish a standby trust fund.
Insurance. An insurance policy is
basically a contract through which
one party guarantees another party
monies, usually a prescribed amount,
to perform the closure or post-clo-
sure care in return for premiums
paid. The policy should be issued for
a face amount at least equal to the
current cost estimate for closure and
post-closure care. The face amount
refers to the total amount the insurer
is obligated to pay; actual payments
do not change the face amount.
Corporate financial test. Corporate
financial tests are a method for an
owner and operator to self-guarantee
that they have the financial resources
to pay for closure and post-closure
costs. These tests might require that a
company meet a specified net worth,
a specified ratio of total liabilities to
net worth, and a specified net work-
ing capital in the United States.
Implicit in using a financial test is a
reliance on Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) to pro-
vide fairly represented accounting
data. Your financial statements should
be audited by an independent certi-
fied public accountant. If the accoun-
tant gives an adverse opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion of the financial
statements, you should use a different
financial assurance mechanism.
Corporate guarantee. Under a cor-
porate guarantee, a parent company
guarantees to pay for closure and
post-closure care, if necessary. The
parent company should pass a finan-
cial test to show that it has adequate
financial strength to provide the
guarantee. A financial test is a way
for guarantors to use financial data to
show that their resources are ade-
quate to meet closure and post-clo-
sure care costs. The guarantee should
only be used by firms with adequate
financial strength.
Other financial assurance mecha-
nisms. If you consider other financial
assurance mechanisms, you should
talk to your state to see if the mecha-
nism is acceptable.
11-33
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Performing Closure and Post-
Closure Care Activity List
You should consider the following while developing closure and post-closure care activities for industrial
waste management units.
Q Develop a closure and post-closure plan, specifying the activities, unit type, waste type, and schedule
of the closure.
Q If using a final cover to accomplish closure:
— Include the specifications for the final cover in the closure plan.
— Determine whether the waste will need stabilization or solidification prior to constructing the final
cover.
— Address site-specific factors that can affect cover performance.
— Select the appropriate materials to use for each layer of the final cover.
— Evaluate the effectiveness of the final cover design using an appropriate methodology or modeling
program.
— Establish a maintenance plan for the cover system.
— Establish a program for monitoring the leachate collection system, ground-water quality, and gas
generation during the post-closure period.
— Ensure proper quality assurance and quality control during final cover installation and post-clo-
sure monitoring.
Q If accomplishing closure by waste removal:
— Include estimates of the waste volume, contaminated soils and containment structures to be
removed during closure.
— Establish baseline conditions and check to see if the state requires numeric cleanup levels.
— Develop removal procedures.
— Develop a sampling and analysis plan.
— Ensure proper quality assurance and quality control during sampling.
Q Determine what post-closure activities will be appropriate at the site.
Q Estimate the costs of closure and post-closure care activities and consider financial assurance mecha-
nisms to help plan for these future costs.
11-34
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Resources
ASTM. D-3987-85. Standard Test Method for Shake Extraction of Solid Waste with Water.
ASTM. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater.
ASTM, APHA, AWWA, & WPCF. Standard Test Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater.
Bagchi, A. 1994. Design, Construction, and Monitoring of Landfills. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Solid Waste Section. 1995. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
Alternate Design Closure Guidance.
Geosynthetic Research Institute. 1990. Landfill Closures: Geosynthetics Interface Friction and New
Developments. GRI Proceedings.
Grefe, R. P. 1989. Closure of Papermill Sludge Lagoons Using Geosynthetics and Subsequent Performance.
Presented at the Twelfth Annual Madison Waste Conference. September.
Heath, Jeffrey H. 1996. "Landfill Closures: Balancing Environmental Protection with Cost," MSW
Management. January/February pp. 66-70.
ICF Incorporated. 1996. Memorandum to U.S. EPA: Updated Closure and Post-Closure Cost Estimates for
Subtitle C. (Nevin and Brawn to Ruhter, September 11, 1996).
Jesionek, K.S., RJ. Dunn, and D.E. Daniel. 1995. Evaluation of Landfill Final Covers. Proceedings Sardinia
95, Fifth International Landfill Symposium. October.
Koerner, R.M. and D.E. Daniel. 1997. Final Covers for Solid Waste Landfills and Abandoned Dumps.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. 2000. Chapter 5 of Solid Waste Financial Assurance
Program Report.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy. 1994. Technical Manual for Division of Solid
Waste Management Bureau of Landfill Engineering Landfill Permits.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Industrial & Hazardous Waste Division. 1993. Closure
Guidance Documents (Draft). September.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Industrial Solid Waste Management. 1984. "Closure and
Post-Closure Estimates."
-------
Ensuring Long-Term Protection—Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care
Resources (cont.)
U.S. EPA. 1996. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846.
U.S. EPA. 1995. Decision-Maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management, Second Edition. EPA530-R-95-023.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Design, Operation, and Closure ol Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. EPA625-R-94-008.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Users Guide for
Version 3. EPA600-R-94-168a.
U.S. EPA. 1994c. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering
Documentation for Version 3. EPA600-R-94-168b.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria: Technical Manual. EPA530-R-93-017.
U.S. EPA. 1991. Seminar Publication: Design and Construction of RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers. EPA625-
4-91-025.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Sites for Our Solid Waste: a Guidebook for Effective Public Involvement. EPA530-SW-90-
019.
U.S. EPA. 1989a. Seminar Publication: Requirements for Hazardous Waste Landfill Design, Construction,
and Closure. EPA625-4-89-022.
U.S. EPA. 1989b. Technical Guidance Document: Final Covers on Hazardous Waste Landfills and Surface
Impoundments. EPA530-SW-89-047.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Guide to Technical Resources for the Design of Land Disposal Facilities. EPA625-6-88-
018.
U.S. EPA. 1979. Method for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA600-4-79-020.
Washington Department of Ecology, Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program. 1994. Guidance for
Clean Closure of Dangerous Waste Facilities.
Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Solid and Hazardous Waste Division. 1994. Solid Waste
Guideline #12: Participation in the State Trust Account.
11-36
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010259A
010267#
010192#
010366A
010180#
010078#
010331B
010407#
010020#
010345A
010306A
010099A
010186#
010146#
010071B
010079#
010144#
010314#
010001#
010100A
015000#
010315#
010004#
015001#
015002A
010255A
010115#
010226#
010116#
010230#
010224A
01 0276 A
010012A
010072#
015009C
010117#
010118#
010347A
010231#
010033#
010373#
010013#
010204#
010181#
010050A
015010#
010233#
Communities Participating
Community Name
** ALABAMA
ABBEVILLE, CITY OF
ADAMSVILLE, CITY OF
ALABASTER, CITY OF
ALBERTVILLE, CITY OF
ALICEVILLE, CITY OF
ALTOONA, TOWN OF
ANDALUSIA, CITY OF
ANDERSON, TOWN OF
ANNISTON, CITY OF
ARAB, CITY OF
ARDMORE, TOWN OF
ASHFORD, TOWN OF
ASHVILLE, TOWN OF
ATHENS, CITY OF
ATMORE, CITY OF
ATTALLA, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUTAUGA COUNTY *
AUTAUGAVILLE, TOWN OF
AVON, TOWN OF
BALDWIN COUNTY*
BARBOUR COUNTY*
BAY MINETTE, CITY OF
BAYOU LA BATRE, CITY OF
BENTON, TOWN OF
BERRY, TOWN OF
BESSEMER, CITY OF
BIBB COUNTY*
BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE TOWNS OF BROWNVILLE AND
ROOSEVELT
BLOUNT COUNTY*
BLUE SPRINGS, TOWN OF
BOAZ, CITY OF
BRENT, TOWN OF
BREWTON, CITY OF
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BRIGHTON, TOWN OF
BROOKSIDE, TOWN OF
BRUNDIDGE, CITY OF
BULLOCK COUNTY*
BUTLER, CITY OF
CALERA, TOWN OF
CALHOUN COUNTY *
CARBON HILL, CITY OF
CARROLLTON, TOWN OF
CASTLEBERRY, TOWN OF
CEDAR BLUFF,TOWN OF
CENTRE, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
HENRY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
AUTAUGA COUNTY
AUTAUGA COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BULLOCK COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
CONECUH COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/85(R)
10/10/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/17/78(R)
03/14/80(R)
02/26/99
09/07/00(R)
09/15/83(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/15/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/17/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/24/77(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/16/81(R)
12/18/85(R)
02/03/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/12/73(R)
01/01/87(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/17/72(R)
04/06/73(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/17/91(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/01/94(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/05/82(R)
05/01/95(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
03/14/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/85(M)
01/20/99
06/15/81
09/04/85(M)
07/17/78
03/14/80(M)
06/02/78
03/02/81
02/03/93
08/01/87(L)
04/15/86
09/04/85(M)
04/17/87
09/28/79
06/24/77(M)
12/01/81
05/17/93
12/18/85
12/18/85
09/01/86(L)
09/20/96
01/01/87(L)
12/01/81
07/06/98
10/17/75
06/03/86(M)
01/20/99
08/01/87(L)
01/20/99
06/17/91
09/01/86(L)
09/04/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
04/16/90
07/18/85
01/20/99
01/20/99
06/01/94(L)
06/01/87(L)
07/05/82
05/01/95(L)
02/03/93
12/17/87
08/15/78
08/01/87(L)
01/01/87(L)
03/14/80(M)
Page 1 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010369A
010026#
010376#
010234#
010208#
015003#
010197#
010310#
010277#
010031#
010415
010377#
010223#
010239#
010318#
010066#
010101A
010319#
010052#
015012#
010205#
010102#
010141#
010244#
010103
010246#
010409#
010209C
010211A
010060#
010061#
010063#
010005#
010418#
010176#
010157#
010381#
010104#
010350B
010056
010353
010073#
015004A
010406#
010045#
010251#
010281
010077#
010011#
010093A
010051A
010120#
Community Name
CENTREVILLE, CITY OF
CHAMBERS COUNTY*
CHATOM, TOWN OF
CHEROKEE COUNTY*
CHEROKEE, CITY OF
CHICKASAW, CITY OF
CHILDERSBURG, CITY OF
CHOCTAW COUNTY*
CITRONELLE, CITY OF
CLANTON, CITY OF
CLAYHATCHEE, TOWN OF
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
CLIO, TOWN OF
COFFEE COUNTY *
COLBERT COUNTY
COLLINSVILLE, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
CONECUH COUNTY*
COOSA COUNTY *
COOSADA, TOWN OF
CORDOVA, CITY OF
COTTONWOOD, TOWN OF
COURTLAND, TOWN OF
COVINGTON COUNTY *
COW ARTS, TOWN OF
CRENSHAW COUNTY*
CREOLA, CITY OF
CULLMAN, CITY OF
DADEVILLE, CITY OF
DALE COUNTY *
DALEVILLE, CITY OF
DALLAS COUNTY*
DAPHNE, CITY OF
DAUPHIN ISLAND, TOWN OF
DECATUR, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF FLINT CITY
DEMOPOLIS, CITY OF
DORA, CITY OF
DOTHAN, CITY OF
DOUBLE SPRINGS, TOWN OF
DOZIER, TOWN OF
DUTTON, TOWN OF
EAST BREWTON, CITY OF
ELBA, CITY OF
ELMORE COUNTY*
ENTERPRISE, CITY OF
ESCAMBIA COUNTY *
ETHELSVILLE, TOWN OF
ETOWAH COUNTY *
EUFAULA, CITY OF
BUT AW, CITY OF
EVERGREEN, CITY OF
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
County
BIBB COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
CHILTON COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
CONECUH COUNTY
COOSA COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
CULLMAN COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
WINSTON COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CONECUH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/85(R)
07/04/88(R)
11/01/99
06/17/91(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/28/72(R)
12/17/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/17/77(R)
05/01/84(R)
01/06/95
05/01/94(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/05/90(R)
07/09/8 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
03/31/98
08/15/84(R)
09/17/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
04/05/88(R)
04/17/78(R)
09/01/90(R)
10/29/98
07/17/86(R)
12/31/81(R)
01/14/77(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
12/11/70(R)
09/05/79(R)
12/17/87(R)
03/20/92
01/15/88(R)
09/01/91(R)
03/01/95(R)
03/18/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
10/06/72(R)
02/19/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/31/98
03/18/85(R)
02/27/90(R)
01/15/88(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/26/98(R)
09/11/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/85(M)
07/04/88
10/20/78
06/17/91
03/14/80
07/06/98
12/17/87
09/30/88
07/06/98
05/01/84
(NSFHA)
05/01/94(L)
07/18/85(M)
12/05/90
06/15/81
04/15/80
09/04/85(M)
07/07/78
08/15/84
08/19/86
03/16/81
04/05/88
04/17/78
09/01/90(L)
07/17/86(M)
07/06/98
11/03/78(M)
09/18/85(M)
07/04/89
07/04/89
09/29/86
01/03/85
07/06/98
05/02/99
09/05/90
04/04/80
01/15/88
09/01/91(L)
03/01/95(L)
(NSFHA)
12/04/79
05/07/76
02/19/86
07/02/80
10/27/78
(NSFHA)
04/15/82(M)
01/15/88
08/19/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
01/20/99
Page 2 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010006D
010177#
010219#
010084#
010074#
010332
010140#
010007B
010067#
010322#
010038
010121#
010355A
010080#
010269#
010258A
010085#
010018B
010034A
010256A
010081#
010220#
010105B
010284A
010266#
010091#
010336A
010329#
010039A
010162#
015005#
010311#
010152#
010094#
010303A
010163#
010059#
010086B
010178#
010097B
010043#
010294#
010261A
010305A
010021#
010254#
010111#
015006#
010123#
010098#
010337#
010153#
010185#
010430#
Community Name
FAIRHOPE, CITY OF
FALKVILLE, TOWN OF
FAYETTE COUNTY *
FAYETTE, CITY OF
FLOMATON, TOWN OF
FLORALA, CITY OF
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FOLEY, CITY OF
FORT PAYNE, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY*
FULTON, TOWN OF
FULTONDALE, CITY OF
FYFFE, TOWN OF
GADSDEN, CITY OF
GARDENDALE, CITY OF
GENEVA COUNTY *
GENEVA, CITY OF
GEORGIANA, CITY OF
GILBERTOWN, TOWN OF
GLEN ALLEN, TOWN OF
GLENCOE, CITY OF
GORDO, TOWN OF
GORDON, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GRAYSVILLE, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENSBORO, CITY OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GROVE HILL, TOWN OF
GUIN, TOWN OF
GULF SHORES, TOWN OF
GUNTERSVILLE, CITY OF
GURLEY, TOWN OF
HALE COUNTY*
HALEYVILLE, CITY OF
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HANCEVILLE, TOWN OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HARTSELLE, CITY OF
HEADLAND, CITY OF
HEFLIN, CITY OF
HELENA, TOWN OF
HENRY COUNTY*
HILLSBORO, TOWN OF
HOBSON CITY, TOWN OF
HOKES BLUFF, TOWN OF
HOLLYWOOD, TOWN OF
HOMEWOOD, CITY OF
HOOVER, CITY OF
HOUSTON COUNTY *
HUEYTOWN, CITY OF
HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF
HURTSBORO, TOWN OF
INDIAN SPRINGS VILLAGE, TOWN OF
ADOPTED SHELBY COUNTY FIRM DATED 9-16-82.
County
BALDWIN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HALE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HALE COUNTY
WINSTON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
CULLMAN COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
CLEBURNE COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/05/78(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/01/84(R)
12/17/87(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/03/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
01/18/91(R)
08/14/00
05/05/81(R)
09/29/86(R)
04/04/83(R)
11/21/80(R)
05/01/95(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/15/77(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
08/15/78(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
11/21/80(R)
04/16/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
08/19/91(R)
03/01/95(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/25/76(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/22/77(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/05/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/02/86(R)
09/30/83(R)
03/28/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
03/30/73(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/29/89(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
11/01/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/10/99(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/01/81
05/02/99
09/18/85
03/01/84
12/17/87
(NSFHA)
01/20/82
07/03/86(M)
05/01/80
01/20/82
07/18/75
01/20/99
09/29/86
04/04/83
01/20/99
05/01/95(L)
03/04/87
07/15/77(M)
07/03/86(M)
09/18/85(M)
12/01/81
08/15/78
04/02/86(M)
04/02/86(M)
01/20/99
04/16/90
08/19/85(M)
05/01/80
09/04/85(M)
09/28/79
09/17/92
08/19/91
04/20/98
07/01/87(L)
06/25/76(M)
01/16/80
04/02/93
07/22/77(M)
05/02/99
08/19/86(M)
07/05/82
01/06/82
08/01/87(L)
04/02/86(M)
09/30/83
03/28/80(M)
09/29/86
01/20/99
01/20/99
09/29/89
01/20/99
04/20/98
01/06/82
Page 3 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010124#
010110#
010040#
010022#
010206#
010217#
010136A
010338A
010265#
010106#
010237A
010028A
010271#
010029#
010323#
010324#
010125#
010235
010046C
010307#
010198#
010158#
010126#
010330#
010195#
010225A
010272#
010009#
010058B
010148#
010151#
010308#
010107B
010087A
010032#
010156#
010161#
010313#
010275#
010127#
010248A
010370#
010137#
015008#
015007#
010325#
010173
010349#
010278#
010174#
Community Name
IRONDALE, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON, CITY OF
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JASPER, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
KENNEDY, TOWN OF
KILLEN, TOWN OF
KIMBERLY, TOWN OF
KINSEY, TOWN OF
KINSTON, TOWN OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAMAR COUNTY *
LANETT, CITY OF
LAUDERDALE COUNTY *
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LEEDS, CITY OF
LEESBURG, CITY OF
LEIGHTON, CITY OF
LIMESTONE COUNTY *
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LINDEN, CITY OF
LIPSCOMB, CITY OF
LITTLEVILLE, TOWN OF
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LOUISVILLE, TOWN OF
LOWNDES COUNTY *
LOXLEY, TOWN OF
LUVERNE, CITY OF
MACON COUNTY *
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, CITY OF
MADRID, TOWN OF
MALVERN, TOWN OF
MAPLESVILLE, TOWN OF
MARENGO COUNTY *
MARION COUNTY *
MARION, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MIDFIELD, CITY OF
MIDLAND CITY, CITY OF
MILLBROOK, CITY OF
MILLPORT, TOWN OF
MOBILE COUNTY*
MOBILE, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY *
MONROEVILLE, CITY OF
MONTEVALLO, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MONTGOMERY, CITY OF
County
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
CHILTON COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
AUTAUGA COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/8 1(R)
05/03/90(R)
12/17/87(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/17/82(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/1 8/8 1(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/30/77(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/04/90(R)
07/04/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/14/91(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/02/99
08/19/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
ll/24/78(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/15/84(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/24/77(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/15/78(R)
07/18/85(R)
02/24/78(R)
02/01/84(R)
01/17/90(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/04/9 1(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/15/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/11/70(R)
09/15/72(R)
06/04/90(R)
03/18/85(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/06/82(R)
01/20/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/20/99
05/03/90
12/17/87
07/05/82
06/15/81
06/16/99
08/05/86(M)
07/18/85(M)
01/20/99
09/29/86(M)
12/30/77(M)
09/18/85(M)
06/04/90
07/04/88
03/18/91
06/15/81
01/20/99
10/15/76
08/19/85
05/02/99
07/18/83
09/18/85(M)
01/20/99
ll/24/78(M)
08/15/80
09/01/87(L)
08/15/84
12/01/81
12/17/76
07/18/83
04/20/98
04/20/98
07/18/85(M)
02/24/78(M)
02/01/84
01/17/90
12/04/79
06/17/86(M)
09/28/90
01/20/99
08/05/86(M)
08/15/84
09/18/85
07/06/98
07/06/98
06/04/90
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
01/02/92
01/02/92
Page 4 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010187#
010175#
010264#
010142#
010096#
010169#
010128#
010129#
010047#
010238
010154#
010419#
010260A
010202#
010149#
010299#
010188#
010015#
010145#
010241A
015011
010064
010218#
010023#
010062B
010214A
010298A
010193#
010189#
010184#
010283#
010423#
010024#
010286A
01 0249 A
010268#
010075A
010002#
010170#
010351#
010368#
010243
010253A
010221#
010427
010054B
010288A
010076#
010348#
Community Name
MOODY, TOWN OF
MORGAN COUNTY *
MORRIS, TOWN OF
MOULTON, CITY OF
MOUND VILLE, TOWN OF
MOUNT VERNON, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN BROOK, CITY OF
MULGA, TOWN OF
MUSCLE SHOALS, CITY OF
NEW BROCKTON, TOWN OF
NEW HOPE, TOWN OF
NEWTON, TOWN OF
NEWVILLE, TOWN OF
NORTHPORT, CITY OF
NOTASULGA, TOWN OF
OAKMAN, TOWN OF
ODENVILLE, TOWN OF
ONEONTA, CITY OF
OPELIKA, CITY OF
OPP, CITY OF
ORANGE BEACH, CITY OF
USE THE BALDWIN COUNTY [015000] FIRM.
ORRVILLE,TOWN OF
OWENS CROSS ROADS, CITY OF
OXFORD, CITY OF
OZARK, CITY OF
PAINT ROCK, TOWN OF
PARRISH, TOWN OF
PELHAM, TOWN OF
PELL CITY, CITY OF
PHENIX CITY, CITY OF
PICKENS COUNTY *
PICKENSVILLE, TOWN OF
USE THE PICKENS COUNTY [010283] FIRM
PIEDMONT, CITY OF
PIKE COUNTY*
PINCKARD, TOWN OF
PLEASANT GROVE, CITY OF
POLLARD, TOWN OF
PRATTVILLE, CITY OF
PRICHARD, CITY OF
RAINBOW CITY, CITY OF
RAINSVILLE, CITY OF
RED LEVEL, TOWN OF
REECE CITY, CITY OF
REFORM, TOWN OF
REPTON, TOWN OF
RIVER FALLS, TOWN OF
RIVERSIDE, TOWN OF
RIVERVIEW, TOWN OF
ROANOKE, CITY OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
HALE COUNTY
TUSCALOOSA
COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
TUSCALOOSA
COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
AUTAUGA COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
CONECUH COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/04/89(R)
03/01/91(R)
06/03/86(R)
10/16/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/16/77(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/19/80(R)
12/15/77(R)
07/22/77(R)
1 l/24/78(R)
07/05/93(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/05/79(R)
ll/24/78(R)
03/14/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/16/81(R)
07/18/85(R)
01/12/73(R)
03/18/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
01/18/84(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/30/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
07/04/89(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/04/90(R)
06/06/96(R)
06/15/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/19/80(R)
02/28/92
08/15/78(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
01/06/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
05/03/99
02/01/91(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/31/98
07/08/77(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/04/86(R)
05/03/95(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/17/92
05/02/99
01/20/99
10/16/79
07/18/85(M)
07/06/98
01/20/99
01/20/99
05/03/93
(NSFHA)
04/20/98
07/05/93
09/29/86(M)
09/07/00
ll/24/78(M)
03/14/80(M)
07/02/91
09/20/96
09/16/81
07/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/20/98
02/03/93
08/05/85(M)
06/17/86(M)
05/30/80(M)
06/15/81
07/04/89
09/16/81
06/04/90
06/15/84
08/01/87(L)
09/04/85(M)
01/20/99
03/21/80
10/23/81
07/06/98
01/06/82
05/01/80
01/10/75
02/01/91(L)
07/03/78
07/08/77(M)
08/19/86(M)
09/04/86(M)
07/05/82
Page 5 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010222#
010287#
010216#
010088B
010171#
010361A
010172#
010112#
010065#
010048#
010191#
010010B
010089C
010082#
010429
010289A
010290#
010291A
010113#
010138B
010194#
010199#
010297#
010200#
010069#
010131#
010273B
010041#
010344#
010143B
010155#
010309#
010285A
010133#
010203#
010049#
010150#
010016#
010068#
010424
010139#
010132#
010292#
010183B
010301#
010252#
010263#
010302#
010109
Community Name
ROBERTSDALE, CITY OF
RUSSELL COUNTY *
RUSSELLVILLE, CITY OF
SAMSON, CITY OF
SARALAND, CITY OF
SARDIS,CITY OF
SATSUMA, CITY OF
SCOTTSBORO, CITY OF
SELMA, CITY OF
SHEFFIELD, CITY OF
SHELBY COUNTY*
SILVERHILL, TOWN OF
SLOCOMB, CITY OF
SOUTHSIDE, CITY OF
SPANISH FORT, CITY OF
SPRINGVILLE, TOWN OF
ST. CLAIR COUNTY *
STEELE, TOWN OF
STEVENSON, CITY OF
SULLIGENT, TOWN OF
SUMTER COUNTY*
SYLACAUGA, CITY OF
TALLADEGA COUNTY *
TALLADEGA, CITY OF
TALLASSEE, CITY OF
TARRANT, CITY OF
THOMASTON, TOWN OF
THOMASVILLE, CITY OF
THORSBY, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF THORSBY HAS ADOPTED THE
CHILTON COUNTY (010030) FIRM
DATED 8-15-84.
TOWN CREEK, TOWN OF
TRIANA, TOWN OF
TRINITY, TOWN OF
TROY, CITY OF
TRUSSVILLE, CITY OF
TUSCALOOSA, CITY OF
TUSCUMBIA, CITY OF
TUSKEGEE, CITY OF
UNION SPRINGS, CITY OF
VALLEY HEAD, TOWN OF
VALLEY, CITY OF
VERNON, CITY OF
VESTAVIA HILLS, CITY OF
VINCENT, TOWN OF
WADLEY, TOWN OF
WALKER COUNTY *
WALNUT GROVE, TOWN OF
WARRIOR, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WEBB, TOWN OF
County
BALDWIN COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
MOBILE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
CHILTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TUSCALOOSA
COUNTY
COLBERT COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
BULLOCK COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
ETOWAH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/01/81(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/17/77(R)
12/18/79(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/04/86(R)
12/15/77(R)
12/15/86(R)
12/14/79(R)
12/16/77(R)
07/02/87(R)
05/03/99
08/19/86(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/17/87(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/01/87(R)
12/17/87(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/15/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
1 l/28/97(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
1 l/24/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/18/81(R)
02/01/79(R)
12/01/77(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/15/98
12/17/87(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/31/98(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/16/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/01/81
09/16/81
08/01/79
02/24/78
07/06/98
01/01/87(L)
07/06/98
09/18/85
03/04/86
03/18/83
09/16/82
12/14/79(M)
12/16/77(M)
07/02/87(M)
08/19/86(M)
09/29/89
09/18/85(M)
12/17/87
06/25/76(M)
08/01/87(L)
12/17/87
07/02/80
04/15/80
09/15/83
01/20/99
08/19/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
04/20/98
05/02/99
09/18/85(M)
01/20/99
09/07/00
12/01/77
01/06/82
08/15/83
12/05/96
12/17/87
01/20/99
06/15/81
08/19/85(M)
07/05/82
03/16/81
01/20/99
08/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
Page 6 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010401#
010014#
010070#
010327#
010404#
010164#
010304#
010114#
010196#
Community Name
WEDOWEE, TOWN OF
WEST BLOCTON, TOWN OF
WETUMPKA, CITY OF
WILCOX COUNTY*
WILSONVILLE, TOWN OF
WINFIELD, CITY OF
WINSTON COUNTY *
WOODVILLE, TOWN OF
YORK, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
County
RANDOLPH COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
WILCOX COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
WINSTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
310
296
7
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/29/98(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
05/01/87(R)
03/01/95(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/01/91(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/01/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/05/82
09/18/85(M)
01/03/86
05/01/87(L)
03/01/95(L)
11/01/79
09/01/91(L)
05/03/90
08/01/80
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 92
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 14
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 9
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
010095
010210A
010229
010242
010352#
010134B
010083A
010257
010371#
010092
010296A
010372A
010055A
010342#
010017#
010374#
010119#
010240
010375#
010030#
010316#
010228
010367
010379#
010247#
010380#
010320#
010135B
010383A
010027
010384#
010295
010053B
010386#
010356#
010057A
010387#
010388#
010293
010357
010390A
010391#
010250#
010416#
Community Name
** ALABAMA
AKRON, TOWN OF
ALEXANDER CITY, CITY OF
ALLGOOD, TOWN OF
BABBIE, TOWN OF
BEAR CREEK, TOWN OF
BEAVERTON, TOWN OF
BELK, TOWN OF
BLACK, TOWN OF
BLOUNTSVILLE, TOWN OF
BOLIGEE, CITY OF
BON AIR, TOWN OF
BRANCHVILLE, TOWN OF
BRANTLEY, TOWN OF
BRILLIANT, TOWN OF
BUTLER COUNTY *
CAMP HILL, TOWN OF
CARDIFF, TOWN OF
CAROLINA, TOWN OF
CARRVILLE, TOWN OF
CHILTON COUNTY *
CLARKE COUNTY *
CLEVELAND, TOWN OF
CROSSVILLE, TOWN OF
CUBA, TOWN OF
CULLMAN COUNTY *
DAVISTON, TOWN OF
DE KALB COUNTY *
DETROIT,TOWN OF
EPES, TOWN OF
FIVE POINTS, TOWN OF
FORT DEPOSIT, TOWN OF
GAINESVILLE, TOWN OF
GANTT, TOWN OF
GEIGER, TOWN OF
GERALDINE, TOWN OF
GLENWOOD, TOWN OF
GOODWATER, TOWN OF
HAMMONDVILLE, TOWN OF
HARPERSVILLE, TOWN OF
HENAGAR, TOWN OF
KANSAS, TOWN OF
LAKEVIEW, TOWN OF
LEE COUNTY *
LEVEL PLAINS, TOWN OF
County
HALE COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GENEVA COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
TALLADEGA COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
CHILTON COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
CULLMAN COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
COOSA COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
DALE COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/18/75
09/27/85(F)
01/24/75
01/10/75
06/18/76
07/03/86(F)
09/13/74
02/07/75
09/29/78
12/13/74
03/04/77
09/15/78
06/28/74
07/15/77
04/21/78
09/29/78
0 1/02/8 1(F)
01/10/75
12/15/78
08/15/84(F)
06/09/78
03/05/76
10/29/76
03/16/79
07/28/78(F)
10/06/78
04/28/78
06/01/87(F)
10/20/78
11/15/74
09/29/78
10/15/76
06/07/74
11/30/79
03/12/73
09/20/74
11/03/78
1 1/03/78
04/11/75
03/12/76
03/16/79
09/07/79
09/16/81(F)
08/03/89(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/18/76
11/01/85(8)
01/24/76
01/10/76
06/18/77
07/03/86(8)
09/13/75
02/07/76
09/29/79
12/13/75
03/04/78
09/15/79
06/28/75
07/15/78
04/21/79
09/29/79
09/20/75
01/10/76
12/15/79
07/28/79
06/09/79
03/05/77
10/29/77
03/16/80
07/28/79
10/06/79
04/28/79
06/01/87(8)
10/20/79
11/15/75
09/29/79
10/15/77
06/07/75
11/30/80
03/12/74
09/20/75
11/03/79
1 1/03/79
04/11/76
03/12/77
03/16/80
09/07/80
02/20/77
08/03/90
Page 8 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
010358
010417#
010393A
010359
010207#
010394#
010395#
010396#
010232
010035#
010245A
010333
010397#
010360#
010398#
010159A
010190B
010182#
010334#
010339A
010362
010399#
010227
010363#
010400#
010328A
010160A
010364
010326#
010037A
010201#
010428#
010335#
010365
010340
010025#
010402#
010405#
Community Name
LEXINGTON, TOWN OF
LISMAN, TOWN OF
MARGARET, TOWN OF
MENTONE, TOWN OF
MILLRY, TOWN OF
NAVVOO, TOWN OF
NEW SITE, TOWN OF
NORTH JOHNS, TOWN OF
OHATCHEE, TOWN OF
PENNINGTON, TOWN OF
PETREY, TOWN OF
PHIL CAMPBELL, TOWN OF
PINE HILL, TOWN OF
PISGAH, TOWN OF
POWELL, TOWN OF
PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF
RAGLAND, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY *
RED BAY, CITY OF
ROGERSVILLE, TOWN OF
SECTION, TOWN OF
SHILOH, TOWN OF
SNEAD, TOWN OF
SOMERVILLE, TOWN OF
SUMITON, TOWN OF
SUMMERDALE, TOWN OF
SWEETWATER, TOWN OF
SYLVANIA, TOWN OF
TALLAPOOSA COUNTY*
TOXEY, TOWN OF
TUSCALOOSA COUNTY *
VANCE, TOWN OF
VINA, TOWN OF
VINEMONT, TOWN OF
WATERLOO, TOWN OF
WEAVER, CITY OF
WEST JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
CRENSHAW COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WILCOX COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
MARENGO COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
TALLAPOOSA
COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
TUSCALOOSA
COUNTY
TUSCALOOSA
COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CULLMAN COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
0
6
0
77
77
Hazard Area
Identified
10/15/76
08/03/89(F)
10/06/78
07/02/76
11/12/76
12/28/79
10/27/78
01/20/99(F)
01/31/75
09/18/85(F)
02/25/77
10/29/76
11/17/78
09/26/75
10/26/79
11/17/78(F)
06/03/86(F)
07/05/82(F)
01/20/82(F)
03/10/78
06/25/76
09/14/79
06/27/75
05/02/99(F)
01/19/79
01/13/78
07/18/75
07/09/76
06/17/91(F)
05/16/77
01/20/82(F)
09/07/00(F)
12/16/77
10/01/76
12/17/76
09/30/83(F)
01/20/99(F)
1 1/02/79
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
10/15/77
08/03/90
10/06/79
07/02/77
11/12/77
12/28/80
10/27/79
01/20/00
01/31/76
09/18/85(8)
02/25/78
10/29/77
11/17/79
09/26/76
10/26/80
11/01/75
06/03/86(8)
09/13/75
12/10/77
03/10/79
06/25/77
09/14/80
06/27/76
06/04/77
01/19/80
01/13/79
07/18/76
07/09/77
03/31/79
05/16/78
05/05/79
09/07/01
12/16/78
10/01/77
12/17/77
09/30/83(8)
02/22/81
1 1/02/80
Page 9 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 10 of 10 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
020005#
020033#
020104#
020037#
020040#
02004 1#
020125#
025009#
020045
020124#
020008A
020049#
020009#
020012#
020003#
020059#
020130
02002 1#
025010#
020069#
020074#
020113#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"ALASKA
ANCHORAGE, MUNICIPALITY OF
INCLUDES CHESTER, CAMPBELL CREEKS, AND THE
HISTORIC CITY & BOROUGH OF ANCHORAGE.
ANIAK, CITY OF
BETHEL, CITY OF
CORDOVA, CITY OF
DELTA JUNCTION, CITY OF
DILLINGHAM, CITY OF
EMMONAK, CITY OF
FAIRBANKS-NORTH STAR BOROUGH
INCLUDES FAIRBANKS & VICINITY & NORTH POLE
FORT YUKON, CITY OF
GALENA, CITY OF
HAINES, CITY OF
HOONAH, CITY OF
JUNEAU, CITY AND BOROUGH OF
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH
INCLUDES THE CITIES OF SELDOVIA, KACHEMAK, 8
SEWARD. THE CITIES OF
HOMER, SOLDOTNA, AND KENAI ARE NOT
INCLUDED AND ARE NOT
PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM [NFIP].
KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH
KOTZEBUE, CITY OF
KWETHLUK, CITY OF
MATANUSKA-SUSITNA, BOROUGH OF
Includes the incorporated areas of the Cities of Houston,
Palmer and Wasila.
NENANA, CITY OF
NOME, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
SEWARD, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
FAIRBANKS NORTH
STAR
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
HAINES BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
JUNEAU BOROUGH
KENAI-COOK
BOROUGH
KETCHIKAN
GATEWAY BO
KOTZEBUE BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
MATANUSKA-SUSITN
ABO
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
KENAI-COOK
DIVISION
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/05/79(R)
04/02/90(R)
03/16/76(R)
04/02/79(R)
09/16/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/22/92
05/15/70
04/24/95
03/01/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
04/02/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
1 1/20/86(R)
04/16/90(R)
07/18/83(R)
10/26/99
05/01/85(R)
06/09/72(R)
09/01/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
11/20/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/05/90
04/02/90
02/15/85
04/02/79
09/16/82
09/30/82
09/21/98
09/20/96
03/01/84
05/01/87(L)
04/02/79
09/28/90
12/06/99
04/16/90
07/18/83
06/03/86
04/21/99
09/01/83
06/01/82
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
THE CITY OF SEWARD HAS ADOPTED THE KENAI
PENINSULA BOROUGH (020012)
FIRM DATED 6-3-88.
020084 SHISHMAREF, CITY OF
020006# SITKA, CITY AND BOROUGH OF
025011 SKAGWAY, CITY OF
020090 TOGIAK, CITY OF
020094# VALDEZ, CITY OF
County
NOME DIVISION
SITKA BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
06/05/98
06/01/82(R)
03/01/77(R)
01/17/97
09/03/80(R)
06/01/82
03/01/77
(NSFHA)
12/01/83
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 27
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 22
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 0
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 1
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 5
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 1
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 2 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
**ALASKA
020107# HOMER, CITY OF
020098# WRANGELL, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
KENAI-COOK
BOROUGH
UNORGANIZED
BOROUGH
0
1
0
Hazard Area
Identified
06/16/99(F)
06/15/82(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
05/19/82
06/15/82(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID
Community Name
"AMERICAN SAMOA
600001# MANUA DISTRICT
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
MANU'A DISTRICT
1
1
0
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
05/02/91(R)
05/02/91
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
04000 1#
040120#
04003 8#
040013A
0400 14#
040039#
040125#
040131#
040126#
040080#
040129#
040040#
040094#
040095#
040035#
0400 12#
0400 19#
040059#
040082
040096#
040015#
040036#
040103#
04004 1#
040083#
040020#
040084#
040135#
04002 1#
040043#
040028#
040044#
040045#
040029#
040046#
040032#
040110#
040111#
040104#
040067#
0400 16#
040085#
040060#
040122#
Communities Participating
Community Name
** ARIZONA
APACHE COUNTY *
APACHE JUNCTION, CITY OF
AVONDALE, CITY OF
BENSON, TOWN OF
BISBEE, CITY OF
BUCKEYE, TOWN OF
BULLHEAD CITY, CITY OF
CAMP VERDE, TOWN OF
CAREFREE, TOWN OF
CASA GRANDE, CITY OF
CAVE CREEK, TOWN OF
CHANDLER, CITY OF
CHINO VALLEY, TOWN OF
CLARKDALE, TOWN OF
CLIFTON, TOWN OF
COCHISE COUNTY*
COCONINO COUNTY *
COLORADO CITY, CITY OF
COOLIDGE, CITY OF
COTTONWOOD, TOWN OF
DOUGLAS, CITY OF
DUNCAN, TOWN OF
EAGAR, TOWN OF
EL MIRAGE, CITY OF
ELOY, CITY OF
FLAGSTAFF, CITY OF
FLORENCE, TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, TOWN OF
USE THE MARICOPA COUNTY [040037] FIRM
FREDONIA, TOWN OF
GILA BEND, TOWN OF
GILA COUNTY *
GILBERT, TOWN OF
GLENDALE, CITY OF
GLOBE, CITY OF
GOODYEAR, CITY OF
GRAHAM COUNTY*
GREENLEE COUNTY*
GUADALUPE, TOWN OF
HAYDEN, TOWN OF
HOLBROOK, CITY OF
HUACHUCA CITY, CITY OF
KEARNY, TOWN OF
KINGMAN, CITY OF
LA PAZ COUNTY*
in the National Flood Program
County
APACHE COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MOHAVE COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
GREENLEE COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
COCONINO COUNTY
MOHAVE COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
GREENLEE COUNTY
APACHE COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
COCONINO COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
COCONINO COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
GREENLEE COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
MOHAVE COUNTY
LA PAZ COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/05/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/25/76(R)
01/03/79(R)
02/15/80(R)
03/15/82(R)
12/30/88(R)
07/02/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
06/09/88(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/01/81(R)
12/01/82(R)
03/01/84(R)
12/04/84(R)
11/16/83(R)
08/04/88(R)
06/10/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/02/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
12/01/78(R)
08/05/80(R)
01/19/83(R)
08/17/81(R)
02/10/94(R)
05/17/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/16/80(R)
04/16/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
07/16/79(R)
12/04/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
04/01/94(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/30/83(R)
02/14/76(R)
08/17/81(R)
08/15/77(R)
09/19/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/17/97
03/19/90
09/30/95
06/25/76(M)
01/03/79
09/30/95
06/02/95
06/06/01
09/30/95
09/29/89
09/30/95
09/30/95
06/06/01
06/06/01
03/01/84
04/17/89
09/30/95
08/04/88
(NSFHA)
06/06/01
09/29/78
08/02/82
08/19/91
09/30/95
09/18/87
08/02/96
08/17/81
05/17/82
09/30/95
09/27/85
09/30/95
09/30/95
05/01/80
09/30/95
07/03/97
09/04/87
09/30/95
09/14/79
09/30/83
09/30/87
08/17/81
12/22/81
09/30/88
Page 1 of 4
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
040116
040128#
040086#
040118#
040037#
040048#
040030#
040058#
040066#
04009 1#
040109#
040049#
040100
040092#
040107#
040050#
04005 1#
040073#
040033#
040077#
040127#
040121#
040098#
040134#
040132#
040124#
040137#
040090#
045012#
040130#
040069#
0400 17#
040070#
040075
04001 1#
0400 10#
040119#
040053#
04007 1#
040054#
040117#
040055#
040106#
040076#
Community Name
LAKE HAVASU, CITY OF
LITCHFIELD PARK, CITY OF
MAMMOTH, TOWN OF
MARANA, TOWN OF
MARICOPA COUNTY*
MESA, CITY OF
MIAMI, TOWN OF
MOHAVE COUNTY*
NAVAJO COUNTY *
NOGALES, CITY OF
ORO VALLEY, TOWN OF
PARADISE VALLEY, TOWN OF
PARKER, TOWN OF
PATAGONIA, TOWN OF
PAYSON, TOWN OF
PEORIA, CITY OF
PHOENIX, CITY OF
PIMA COUNTY *
PIMA, TOWN OF
FINAL COUNTY*
PINETOP-LAKESIDE, TOWN OF
PRESCOTT VALLEY, TOWN OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
QUARTZSITE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF QUARTZSITE IS A NEW COMMUNITY
ELIGIBLE 7-22-92, WAS FORMERLY UNDER LA PAZ
COUNTY [040122].
QUEEN CREEK, TOWN OF
SAFFORD, CITY OF
SAHUARITA, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF SAHUARITA HAS ADOPTED THE PIMA
COUNTY (040073) FIRM DATED 8-19-97.
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY*
SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF
SEDONA, CITY OF
USE THE COCONINO COUNTY [040019] FIRM; USE THE
YAVAPAI COUNTY [040003] FIRM
USE THE COCONINO COUNTY [040019] FIRM; USE THE
YAVAPAI COUNTY [040003] FIRM
SHOW LOW, CITY OF
SIERRA VISTA, CITY OF
SNOWFLAKE, TOWN OF
SOUTH TUCSON, TOWN OF
SPRINGERVILLE, TOWN OF
ST. JOHNS, CITY OF
SUPERIOR, TOWN OF
SURPRISE, TOWN OF
TAYLOR, TOWN OF
TEMPE, CITY OF
THATCHER, TOWN OF
TOLLESON, CITY OF
TOMBSTONE, CITY OF
TUCSON, CITY OF
County
MOHAVE COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MOHAVE COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
LA PAZ COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
LA PAZ COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
COCONINO COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
APACHE COUNTY
APACHE COUNTY
FINAL COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/81(R)
08/19/88(R)
09/1 5/8 1(R)
08/01/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
12/17/76(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
11/17/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/15/83(R)
02/15/84(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/22/88(R)
08/16/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
09/19/84(R)
07/22/92(R)
01/18/85(R)
06/30/97(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/21/73(R)
12/30/88(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/28/84(R)
03/01/82(R)
01/31/79(R)
06/25/76(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
08/11/82(R)
12/15/78(R)
02/03/82(R)
08/15/80(R)
12/15/83(R)
01/16/80(R)
02/16/83(R)
08/02/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
09/30/95
07/03/85
02/08/99
09/30/95
09/30/95
05/01/80
10/20/00
06/05/97
04/15/81
02/08/99
09/30/95
(NSFHA)
03/18/80
03/18/80
09/30/95
09/30/95
02/08/99
02/15/84
03/05/90
09/29/89
06/06/01
06/06/01
12/22/98
07/03/97
02/08/99
08/23/00
09/30/95
06/06/01
08/03/92
09/28/84
02/16/94
(NSFHA)
09/28/90
06/16/93
11/04/81
09/30/95
03/02/94
09/30/95
02/04/88
09/30/95
02/16/83
02/08/99
Page 2 of 4
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
040056#
0400 18#
040027#
04003 1#
040072#
040093#
040057#
040099#
040102#
Community Name
WICKENBURG, TOWN OF
WILLCOX, CITY OF
WILLIAMS, CITY OF
WINKELMAN, TOWN OF
WINSLOW, CITY OF
YAVAPAI COUNTY *
YOUNGTOWN, TOWN OF
YUMA COUNTY *
YUMA, CITY OF
County
MARICOPA COUNTY
COCHISE COUNTY
COCONINO COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
NAVAJO COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
YUMA COUNTY
YUMA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/05/78(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/15/83(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/15/78(R)
12/15/83(R)
07/05/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/95
12/28/82
12/15/83
09/14/79
09/30/92
06/06/01
09/30/95
02/17/89
11/15/85
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 97
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 97
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 4
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 1
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 0
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 4
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
** ARIZONA
040123# COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBE
040138 Jerome, Town of
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
INDIAN
RESERVATION
Yavapai
0
1
0
Hazard Area
Identified
05/04/87(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
05/04/87(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 4 of 4
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050377#
050236#
050107#
050097#
050029#
050066B
050418#
050129#
050003#
050304#
050123
050230A
050383
050222#
050091#
050045#
050162B
050595
050223
050098B
050018B
050384A
050419#
050192#
050012#
050385A
050386#
050387#
050388A
050415
050389#
050118#
050140#
050046#
050016B
050472B
050131A
050420#
050114B
050155B
050047#
050308#
050115B
050394
050602
050309#
050567#
050185#
050421#
Communities
Community Name
** ARKANSAS
ALEXANDER, TOWN OF
ALMA, CITY OF
ALTHEIMER, CITY OF
AMAGON, CITY OF
ARKADELPHIA, CITY OF
ARKANSAS CITY, CITY OF
ARKANSAS COUNTY*
ASHDOWN, CITY OF
ASHLEY COUNTY
ATKINS, CITY OF
AUBREY, CITY OF
AUGUSTA, CITY OF
AUSTIN, TOWN OF
BALD KNOB, CITY OF
BATESVILLE, CITY OF
BAY, CITY OF
BEARDEN, CITY OF
BEAVER, TOWN OF
BEEBE, CITY OF
BEEDEVILLE, TOWN OF
BELLEFONTE, TOWN OF
BELLEVILLE, CITY OF
BENTON COUNTY*
BENTON, CITY OF
BENTONVILLE, CITY OF
BERGMAN,TOWN OF
BETHEL HEIGHTS, TOWN OF
BIGELOW, TOWN OF
BIGGERS, TOWN OF
BISCOE, TOWN OF
BLACK OAK, TOWN OF
BLACK ROCK, CITY OF
BLYTHEVILLE, CITY OF
BONO, CITY OF
BOONE COUNTY
BOONEVILLE, CITY OF
BRADFORD, CITY OF
BRADLEY COUNTY*
BRADLEY, CITY OF
BRINKLEY, CITY OF
BROOKLAND, TOWN OF
BRYANT, CITY OF
BUCKNER, TOWN OF
BULL SHOALS, CITY OF
BURDETTE, CITY OF
CABOT, CITY OF
CADDO VALLEY, TOWN OF
CALDWELL, TOWN OF
CALHOUN COUNTY
Participating in the National
County
PULASKI
SALINE
CRAWFORD
JEFFERSON
JACKSON
CLARK
DESHA
ARKANSAS
LITTLE RIVER
ASHLEY
POPE
LEE
WOODRUFF
LONOKE
WHITE
INDEPENDENCE
CRAIGHEAD
OUACHITA
CARROLL
WHITE
JACKSON
BOONE
YELL
BENTON
SALINE
BENTON
BOONE
BENTON
PERRY
RANDOLPH
PRAIRIE
CRAIGHEAD
LAWRENCE
MISSISSIPPI
CRAIGHEAD
BOONE
LOGAN
WHITE
BRADLEY
LAFAYETTE
MONROE
CRAIGHEAD
SALINE
LAFAYETTE
MARION
MISSISSIPPI
LONOKE
CLARK
ST. FRANCIS
CALHOUN
Flood Program
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/20/82(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/15/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
10/05/82(R)
12/01/89(R)
08/03/82(R)
02/07/83(R)
07/06/82(R)
09/29/95
03/01/87(R)
04/15/82(R)
04/03/87(R)
08/16/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
06/20/78(R)
09/07/89
09/01/81(R)
01/23/79(R)
11/01/85(R)
03/18/86(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
12/15/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/19/96(R)
01/26/83(R)
08/24/82(R)
12/21/90
04/15/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/21/82(R)
12/04/85(R)
01/01/92(R)
06/25/76(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
06/28/77(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/28/77(R)
06/25/76(R)
02/18/94
06/15/98
04/19/83(R)
05/01/85(R)
10/19/82(R)
12/19/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/20/82
12/20/00
08/15/80
04/01/81
02/19/86
10/05/82(M)
03/16/98
01/07/98
11/17/82
07/06/82(M)
12/06/74
03/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
04/03/87
08/16/82
09/27/91
06/20/78(M)
(NSFHA)
01/23/79(M)
11/01/85(M)
03/18/86(M)
12/20/00
12/15/81
12/20/00
02/01/87(L)
12/20/00
06/20/00
08/24/82(M)
11/26/76
(NSFHA)
06/03/91
09/21/82(M)
09/27/91
01/01/92(L)
06/25/76
10/15/85(M)
04/15/86(M)
06/28/77(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/27/91
01/19/96
06/25/76(M)
04/25/75
01/18/89
05/01/85(M)
10/19/82(M)
12/19/97
Page 1 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050094#
050206#
050163#
050099B
050311#
050312A
050062B
050395#
050396#
050397A
050313#
050399#
050080#
050603
050057#
050050#
050025#
050156#
050422#
050112#
050423#
050424#
05021 1#
050315#
050316
050186A
050425B
050426B
050078#
050030#
05023 IB
050401A
050427#
050428#
050429#
050056#
050471
050061#
050404A
050318#
050233#
050204B
050238A
050319#
050026#
050237A
050065C
050001A
050407A
050100#
050596
050321#
050430#
050067#
050143A
Community Name
CALICO ROCK, CITY OF
CALION, CITY OF
CAMDEN, CITY OF
CAMPBELL STATION, CITY OF
CARAWAY, CITY OF
CARLISLE, CITY OF
CARTHAGE, CITY OF
CASA, CITY OF
CASH, TOWN OF
CAULKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CAVE CITY, CITY OF
CENTERTON, CITY OF
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHEROKEE VILLAGE, CITY OF
CHERRY VALLEY, CITY OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHICOT COUNTY *
CLARENDON, CITY OF
CLARK COUNTY *
CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CLEBURNE COUNTY*
CLINTON, CITY OF
COAL HILL, CITY OF
COLLEGE CITY, CITY OF
COLT, CITY OF
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CONWAY COUNTY*
CONWAY, CITY OF
CORNING, CITY OF
COTTON PLANT, CITY OF
COVE, TOWN OF
CRAIGHEAD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY *
CRITTENDEN COUNTY
CROSS COUNTY*
CROSSETT, CITY OF
DALLAS COUNTY
DAMASCUS, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, CITY OF
DARDANELLE, CITY OF
DE QUEEN, CITY OF
DE VALES BLUFF, CITY OF
DECATUR, CITY OF
DERMOTT, CITY OF
DBS ARC, CITY OF
DESHA COUNTY *
DEWITT,CITY OF
DIAMOND CITY,CITY OF
DIAZ, CITY OF
DONALDSON, CITY OF
DOVER, CITY OF
DREW COUNTY*
DUMAS, CITY OF
DYESS, CITY OF
County
IZARD
UNION
OUACHITA
JACKSON
CRAIGHEAD
LONOKE
DALLAS
PERRY
CRAIGHEAD
LOGAN
SHARP
BENTON
FRANKLIN
SHARP
CROSS
CRAWFORD
CHICOT
MONROE
CLARK
JOHNSON
CLAY
CLEBURNE
VAN BUREN
JOHNSON
LAWRENCE
ST. FRANCIS
COLUMBIA
CONWAY
FAULKNER
CLAY
WOODRUFF
POLK
CRAIGHEAD
CRAWFORD
CRITTENDEN
CROSS
ASHLEY
DALLAS *
FAULKNER
YELL
YELL
SEVIER
PRAIRIE
BENTON
CHICOT
PRAIRIE
DESHA
ARKANSAS
BOONE
JACKSON
HOT SPRING
POPE
DREW
DESHA
MISSISSIPPI
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/79(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/15/82(R)
01/09/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
12/12/78(R)
08/22/78(R)
03/15/83(R)
09/21/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/24/82(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/25/00
05/04/88(R)
08/05/91(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
03/01/90(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/16/87(R)
05/04/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/25/75
04/01/91(R)
06/03/86(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
10/12/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/20/93(R)
08/05/91(R)
11/01/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/11/76(R)
12/01/89(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/30/70(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/17/86(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
11/15/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/11/90
03/15/83(R)
10/14/98
11/19/80(R)
01/17/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/04/79
07/02/80
03/15/82
01/09/79(M)
09/27/91
12/12/78(M)
08/22/78(M)
06/20/00
09/27/91
07/03/85(M)
02/18/98
12/20/00
07/17/97
05/04/88
12/20/00
09/28/79
07/16/80
08/05/85(M)
05/18/99
03/01/90(L)
09/30/88
11/06/91
05/04/82(M)
(NSFHA)
10/03/75
04/01/91(L)
06/03/86(M)
02/04/98
07/02/80
10/12/82(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/27/91
12/20/00
08/23/99(M)
06/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
12/01/89(L)
07/03/85(M)
05/05/81
11/15/85
09/04/85(M)
01/17/86(M)
12/20/00
03/04/88
01/03/86(M)
11/15/85(M)
07/01/87(L)
02/01/87(L)
03/19/90
03/15/83(M)
10/25/77
04/02/86
01/17/86(M)
Page 2 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050054#
050164#
050409A
050207#
050167B
050214#
050213#
05041 1#
050133#
050027#
050322#
050412A
050215#
05043 1#
050216#
050574#
050135B
050063#
050130#
050187#
055013#
050432#
050086#
050433#
050138A
050605
050325A
050244A
050326A
050144
050127#
050128B
050434B
050327#
050328#
050217#
050031
050198#
050101#
050248A
050239A
050199#
050005#
050023#
050330#
050173B
050020#
050200#
050416#
050253A
050331A
050240#
050168#
050436A
Community Name
EARLE, CITY OF
EAST CAMDEN, CITY OF
EDMONDSON, TOWN OF
EL DORADO, CITY OF
ELAINE, CITY OF
ELKINS, CITY OF
ELM SPRINGS, TOWN OF
EMMET, CITY OF
ENGLAND, CITY OF
EUDORA, CITY OF
EUREKA SPRINGS, CITY OF
EVENING SHADE, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FAULKNER COUNTY
FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF
FELSENTHAL, TOWN OF
FLIPPIN, CITY OF
FORDYCE, CITY OF
FOREMAN, CITY OF
FORREST CITY, CITY OF
FORT SMITH, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY*
FULTON, TOWN OF
GARLAND COUNTY *
GARLAND, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
Adopted White County FIRM 3/1/00 Map Panel 050467
0015A
GILLETT, CITY OF
GILLHAM, CITY OF
GLENWOOD, CITY OF
GOSNELL, CITY OF
GOULD, CITY OF
GRADY, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY
GRAVETTE, CITY OF
GREENBRIER, CITY OF
GREENLAND, CITY OF
GREENWAY, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRUBBS, TOWN OF
GUION, TOWN OF
GURDON, CITY OF
HACKETT, CITY OF
HAMBURG, CITY OF
HAMPTON, CITY OF
HARDY, CITY OF
HARRISBURG, CITY OF
HARRISON, CITY OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HASKELL, CITY OF
HATFIELD, TOWN OF
HAZEN, CITY OF
HEBER SPRINGS, CITY OF
HELENA, CITY OF
HEMPSTEAD COUNTY
County
CRITTENDEN
OUACHITA
CRITTENDEN
UNION
PHILLIPS
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
NEVADA
LONOKE
CHICOT
CARROLL
SHARP
WASHINGTON
FAULKNER
WASHINGTON
UNION
MARION
DALLAS
LITTLE RIVER
ST. FRANCIS
SEBASTIAN
FRANKLIN
HEMPSTEAD
GARLAND
MILLER
WHITE
ARKANSAS
SEVIER
PIKE
MISSISSIPPI
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
GRANT
BENTON
FAULKNER
WASHINGTON
CLAY
SEBASTIAN
JACKSON
IZARD
CLARK
SEBASTIAN
ASHLEY
CALHOUN
SHARP
POINSETT
BOONE
SEBASTIAN
SALINE
POLK
PRAIRIE
CLEBURNE
PHILLIPS
HEMPSTEAD
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/03/86(R)
08/24/81(R)
03/18/86(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
04/30/86(R)
06/25/76(R)
01/03/86(R)
03/04/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
11/01/85(R)
08/24/82(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
01/20/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/19/87(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/27/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/27/71(R)
07/17/97(R)
08/03/82(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
06/01/87(R)
02/21/01
01/17/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
06/11/76(R)
08/19/87(R)
10/12/82(R)
02/01/91(R)
08/24/82(R)
07/13/82(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
01/26/83(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/01/81(R)
01/06/98
09/04/85(R)
03/15/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
05/18/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/15/82(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
10/12/82(R)
1 l/27/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
03/28/95
Current Effective
Map
08/23/99(M)
01/05/96
03/18/86(M)
11/15/79
09/04/85(M)
12/20/00
12/20/00
05/25/82(M)
01/05/89
03/04/80
07/16/80
11/01/85(M)
12/20/00
02/04/98
12/20/00
06/19/85(M)
05/19/87(M)
05/15/80
01/07/98
12/04/79
07/16/91
07/17/97
08/03/82(M)
02/15/91
06/01/87(L)
01/17/86(M)
11/01/85(M)
01/03/86(M)
(NSFHA)
08/19/87
10/12/82(M)
02/01/91(L)
12/20/00
02/04/98
12/20/00
(NSFHA)
04/15/81
04/01/81
03/18/77
09/04/85(M)
03/15/82
04/01/82
05/18/82(M)
06/02/94
11/01/85(M)
04/16/93
03/15/82
08/19/87(M)
09/04/85(M)
10/12/82(M)
07/05/93
07/16/79
06/03/77
Page 3 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050255A
050058A
050606
050157#
050087#
050333A
050256#
050437#
050084#
050257#
050438#
050119#
050188B
050258A
050108A
050335
050208#
050120#
050090#
050096#
050102#
050180#
050160B
050440#
050218#
050145#
050048#
050226A
050146#
050227A
050039B
050032B
050442
050049#
050169#
050028B
050113A
050201#
050443#
050147B
050444#
050174#
050116#
050445A
050181#
050339A
050447#
050448#
050341#
050342#
050148A
Community Name
HERMITAGE, TOWN OF
HICKORY RIDGE, CITY OF
HOLLAND, CITY OF
Panel #100 map No. 05045C0100 E for Faulkner County
CID# 050431
HOLLY GROVE, CITY OF
HOPE, CITY OF
HORATIO, CITY OF
HORSESHOE BEND, CITY OF
HOT SPRING COUNTY
HOT SPRINGS, CITY OF
HOUSTON, TOWN OF
HOWARD COUNTY*
HOXIE, CITY OF
HUGHES, CITY OF
HUMNOKE,CITY
HUMPHREY, CITY OF
HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF
HUTTIG, CITY OF
IMBODEN, TOWN OF
INDEPENDENCE COUNTY*
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSONPORT, TOWN OF
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JASPER, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JOHNSON, CITY OF
JOINER, CITY OF
JONESBORO, CITY OF
JUDSONIA, CITY OF
KEISER, CITY OF
KENSETT, CITY OF
KINGSLAND, CITY OF
KNOBEL, TOWN OF
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
LAKE CITY, TOWN OF
LAKE VIEW, CITY OF
LAKE VILLAGE, CITY OF
LAMAR, CITY OF
LAVACA, CITY OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LEACHVILLE, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY
LEPANTO, CITY OF
LEWISVILLE, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY
LITTLE ROCK, CITY OF
LOCKESBURG, CITY OF
LOGAN COUNTY*
LONOKE COUNTY*
LONOKE, CITY OF
LOWELL, CITY OF
LUXORA, CITY OF
County
BRADLEY
CROSS
FAULKNER
MONROE
HEMPSTEAD
SEVIER
FULTON
IZARD
SHARP
HOT SPRING
GARLAND
PERRY
HOWARD
LAWRENCE
ST. FRANCIS
LONOKE
ARKANSAS
JEFFERSON
MADISON
UNION
LAWRENCE
INDEPENDENCE
JACKSON
JACKSON
PULASKI
NEWTON
JEFFERSON
WASHINGTON
MISSISSIPPI
CRAIGHEAD
WHITE
MISSISSIPPI
WHITE
CLEVELAND
CLAY
LAFAYETTE
CRAIGHEAD
PHILLIPS
CHICOT
JOHNSON
SEBASTIAN
LAWRENCE
MISSISSIPPI
LEE
POINSETT
LAFAYETTE
LINCOLN
PULASKI
SEVIER
LOGAN
LONOKE
LONOKE
BENTON
MISSISSIPPI
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/19/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
04/20/0 1(R)
03/15/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
11/01/92(R)
12/18/79(R)
04/15/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/15/80(R)
11/01/85(R)
02/01/87(R)
11/01/85(R)
05/21/01
06/04/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/06/88(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
02/05/86(R)
04/16/91(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/21/82(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/21/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
10/12/82(R)
06/25/76(R)
05/20/91
04/15/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/08/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/04/88(R)
08/03/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
03/04/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
10/18/88(R)
03/14/94(R)
05/06/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
02/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/19/82(M)
01/03/86(M)
07/21/99
04/01/82
11/15/85(M)
09/30/88
11/01/92(L)
02/15/91
06/20/00
09/30/88
04/15/80
11/01/85(M)
02/01/87(L)
11/01/85(M)
06/04/80
06/03/91
01/06/88
03/19/90
02/02/90
08/16/95
02/05/86(M)
04/16/91
12/20/00
09/21/82(M)
09/27/91
09/01/87(L)
09/21/82(M)
08/01/87(L)
10/12/82(M)
06/25/76(M)
09/27/91
09/21/98
08/08/78(M)
07/01/87(L)
09/29/86
06/03/91
06/25/76(M)
10/15/85(M)
07/04/88
08/03/82(M)
09/01/87(L)
1 1/03/93
10/15/85(M)
03/04/91
11/17/82
03/15/82
12/20/00
02/01/87(L)
Page 4 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050263A
050189A
050344#
050041#
050088#
050082#
050149#
050202#
050124#
050150
050345#
050175#
050346A
050170
050577#
050079#
050265#
050232A
050033A
050068#
050228B
050348A
050177A
050203A
050451
050349A
050452#
050154C
050453#
050074#
050006#
050125A
050044#
050353A
050351#
050352A
050051#
050354#
050355A
050089A
050092A
050103#
050267#
050158#
050356A
050182#
050093A
050357#
050597
050151#
050161#
050358#
050359A
050085#
Community Name
LYNN, TOWN OF
MADISON, CITY OF
MAGAZINE, CITY OF
MAGNOLIA, CITY OF
MALVERN, CITY OF
MAMMOTH SPRING, CITY OF
MANILA, CITY OF
MANSFIELD, CITY OF
MARIANNA, CITY OF
MARIE, TOWN OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARKED TREE, CITY OF
MARMADUKE,CITY OF
MARVELL, CITY OF
MAUMELLE, CITY OF
MAYFLOWER, CITY OF
MAYNARD, TOWN OF
MCCRORY,CITY OF
MCDOUGAL, CITY OF
MCGEHEE, CITY OF
MCRAE, CITY OF
MELBOURNE, CITY OF
MENA, CITY OF
MIDLAND, TOWN OF
MILLER COUNTY*
MINERAL SPRINGS,CITY OF
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY *
MONROE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MONTROSE, TOWN OF
MORO,TOWN OF
MORRILTON, CITY OF
MOUNT IDA,CITY OF
MOUNTAIN HOME, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF
MOUNTAINBURG, CITY OF
MULBERRY, CITY OF
MURFREESBORO,CITY OF
NASHVILLE, CITY OF
NEWARK, CITY OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NORFORK, CITY OF
NORMAN, CITY OF
NORPHLET, CITY OF
NORTH LITTLE ROCK, CITY OF
OIL TROUGH, TOWN OF
OLA, CITY OF
OPPELO, CITY OF
OSCEOLA, CITY OF
OUACHITA COUNTY*
OZARK, CITY OF
PALESTINE, CITY OF
PARAGOULD, CITY OF
County
LAWRENCE
ST. FRANCIS
LOGAN
COLUMBIA
HOT SPRING
FULTON
MISSISSIPPI
SCOTT
SEBASTIAN
LEE
MISSISSIPPI
CRITTENDEN
POINSETT
GREENE
PHILLIPS
PULASKI
FAULKNER
RANDOLPH
WOODRUFF
CLAY
DESHA
WHITE
IZARD
POLK
SEBASTIAN
MILLER
HOWARD
MISSISSIPPI
MONROE
MONTGOMERY
DREW
ASHLEY
LEE
CONWAY
MONTGOMERY
BAXTER
STONE
CRAWFORD
CRAWFORD
PIKE
HOWARD
INDEPENDENCE
JACKSON
BAXTER
MONTGOMERY
UNION
PULASKI
INDEPENDENCE
YELL
CONWAY
MISSISSIPPI
OUACHITA
FRANKLIN
ST. FRANCIS
GREENE
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/24/82(R)
02/01/87(R)
07/13/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/02/83(R)
09/03/80(R)
07/20/82(R)
06/18/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/22/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/28/93
02/29/88(R)
03/15/83(R)
09/21/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/19/80(R)
06/25/76(R)
02/01/91(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/01/88(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/16/87(R)
04/01/82(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/16/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
05/27/81(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/13/82(R)
07/26/93
06/30/76(R)
03/01/87(R)
03/15/82(R)
10/12/82(R)
06/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/24/82(M)
02/01/87(L)
07/13/82(M)
07/05/82
03/02/83
09/03/80
07/20/82(M)
05/07/01
09/28/79
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
07/16/80
06/01/87(L)
03/12/76
1 1/02/94
02/04/98
09/21/82(M)
06/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
11/19/80
06/25/76(M)
02/01/91(L)
06/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
04/01/88(L)
06/01/87(L)
11/01/85(M)
07/21/99
07/16/87
04/01/82
03/15/82
06/01/87(L)
03/15/82
06/01/87(L)
06/06/01
07/03/85(M)
12/20/00
12/20/00
06/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
09/01/87(L)
06/18/90
12/03/91
07/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
09/05/90
06/01/87(L)
11/01/85
01/15/80(M)
01/05/96
07/17/97
10/12/82(M)
05/04/92
Page 5 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050132#
050059#
050274A
050361#
050034
050165#
050276#
050362#
050166#
050035#
050109#
050364A
050183#
050172#
050036B
050121#
050008
050277
050572#
050278A
050459#
050279A
050159
050179#
050280A
050460#
050470#
050366A
050282
050070A
050283A
050013#
050126
050052#
050178#
050083
050579#
050191#
050229#
050462D
050576
050463#
050573#
050464A
050367#
050110B
050235#
050287A
050014#
050209#
050064
050219#
050285A
050184#
Community Name
PARIS, CITY OF
PARKIN, CITY OF
PATTERSON,CITY OF
PEA RIDGE,CITY OF
PEACH ORCHARD, CITY OF
PERRY COUNTY
PERRY, TOWN OF
PERRYVILLE, CITY OF
PHILLIPS COUNTY*
PIGGOTT, CITY OF
PINE BLUFF, CITY OF
PLUMERVILLE, CITY OF
POCAHONTAS, CITY OF
POINSETT COUNTY*
POLLARD, CITY OF
PORTIA, CITY OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POTTSVILLE, TOWN OF
POWHATAN, TOWN OF
POYEN, TOWN OF
PRAIRIE COUNTY *
PRATTSVILLE, TOWN OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY *
QUITMAN, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY*
RAVENDEN, TOWN OF
RECTOR, CITY OF
REDFIELD, TOWN OF
REED, TOWN OF
REYNO, TOWN OF
ROGERS, CITY OF
RONDO, CITY OF
RUDY, TOWN OF
RUSSELLVILLE, CITY OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SALESVILLE, CITY OF
SALINE COUNTY *
SEARCY, CITY OF
SEBASTIAN COUNTY*
SEDGWICK, TOWN OF
SEVIER COUNTY*
SHANNON HILLS, CITY OF
SHARP COUNTY *
SHERIDAN, CITY OF
SHERRILL, TOWN OF
SHERWOOD, CITY OF
SHIRLEY, TOWN OF
SILOAM SPRINGS, CITY OF
SMACKOVER, CITY OF
SPARKMAN, CITY OF
SPRINGDALE, CITY OF
ST. CHARLES, TOWN OF
ST. FRANCIS COUNTY *
County
LOGAN
CROSS
WOODRUFF
BENTON
CLAY
PERRY
PERRY
PERRY
PHILLIPS
CLAY
JEFFERSON
CONWAY
RANDOLPH
POINSETT
CLAY
LAWRENCE
ASHLEY
POPE
LAWRENCE
GRANT
PRAIRIE
GRANT
NEVADA
PULASKI
CLEBURNE
RANDOLPH
LAWRENCE
CLAY
JEFFERSON
DESHA
RANDOLPH
BENTON
LEE
CRAWFORD
POPE
FULTON
BAXTER
SALINE
WHITE
SEBASTIAN
LAWRENCE
SEVIER
SALINE
SHARP
GRANT
JEFFERSON
PULASKI
VAN BUREN
BENTON
UNION
DALLAS
BENTON
WASHINGTON
ARKANSAS
ST. FRANCIS
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/06/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
03/25/85(R)
11/17/99(R)
07/20/82(R)
04/19/83(R)
04/01/88(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
01/17/86(R)
01/20/82(R)
08/19/87(R)
08/31/82(R)
08/31/82(R)
03/01/88(R)
04/15/82(R)
03/22/82(R)
ll/23/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
05/01/88(R)
07/16/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/01/88(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/31/82(R)
08/26/77(R)
ll/23/82(R)
08/24/82(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/01/88(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/18/70(R)
04/01/88(R)
04/16/90(R)
11/17/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/01/88(R)
02/01/88
04/01/88(R)
05/17/82(R)
10/26/99
01/18/83(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/17/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/01/88(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
10/12/82(R)
11/01/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/16/93
10/15/85(M)
02/01/87(L)
12/20/00
(NSFHA)
06/20/00
06/20/00
06/20/00
09/21/98
08/04/87
12/01/83
01/17/86(M)
01/20/82
08/16/95
08/31/82(M)
06/03/91
03/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
06/03/91
ll/23/82(M)
10/15/85(M)
11/01/85(M)
05/01/88(L)
07/20/98
10/15/85(M)
04/01/88(L)
06/03/91
08/31/82(M)
(NSFHA)
ll/23/82(M)
08/24/82(M)
12/20/00
08/01/88(L)
12/20/00
12/20/00
04/01/88(L)
12/03/91
01/19/96
02/05/97
05/07/01
04/01/88(L)
08/15/89
06/21/77
01/18/83(M)
06/30/76(M)
08/16/95
07/03/85(M)
12/20/00
07/02/80
03/01/88(L)
12/20/00
10/12/82(M)
11/01/85(M)
Page 6 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050037B
050134
050117#
050368#
050210#
050002#
050288
050289A
050015#
050104B
050042
050137B
050075
050293#
050294A
050176
050105#
050370
050371A
050205#
050566#
050053#
050417#
050111#
050193#
050122#
050372#
050022#
050212#
050072#
050373#
050220#
050171#
050055#
050374A
050467#
050375#
050575
050076A
050153B
050468
050302#
050060#
050136
Community Name
ST. FRANCIS, CITY OF
ST. PAUL, TOWN OF
STAMPS, CITY OF
STAR CITY, CITY OF
STRONG, CITY OF
STUTTGART, CITY OF
SUBIACO, TOWN OF
SUCCESS, TOWN OF
SULPHUR SPRINGS, CITY OF
SWIFTON, CITY OF
TAYLOR, CITY OF
TEXARKANA, CITY OF
TILLAR, CITY OF
TONTITOWN, TOWN OF
TRASKWOOD, CITY OF
TRUMAN, CITY OF
TUCKERMAN, CITY OF
TURRELL, CITY OF
TYRONZA, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY*
VAN BUREN COUNTY*
VAN BUREN, CITY OF
VILONIA, TOWN OF
WABBASEKA, CITY OF
WALDRON, CITY OF
WALNUT RIDGE, CITY OF
WARD, CITY OF
WARREN, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WATSON, CITY OF
WEINER, CITY OF
WEST FORK, CITY OF
WEST HELENA, CITY OF
WEST MEMPHIS, CITY OF
WHEATLEY, CITY OF
WHITE COUNTY *
WHITE HALL, CITY OF
WILLIFORD, TOWN OF
WILMAR, CITY OF
WILSON, CITY OF
WOODRUFF COUNTY*
WOOSTER, TOWN OF
WYNNE, CITY OF
YELLVILLE , CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
CLAY
MADISON
LAFAYETTE
LINCOLN
UNION
ARKANSAS
LOGAN
CLAY
BENTON
JACKSON
COLUMBIA
MILLER
DESHA
DREW
WASHINGTON
SALINE
POINSETT
JACKSON
CRITTENDEN
POINSETT
UNION
VAN BUREN
CRAWFORD
FAULKNER
JEFFERSON
SCOTT
LAWRENCE
LONOKE
BRADLEY
WASHINGTON
DESHA
POINSETT
WASHINGTON
PHILLIPS
CRITTENDEN
ST. FRANCIS
WHITE
JEFFERSON
SHARP
DREW
MISSISSIPPI
WOODRUFF
FAULKNER
CROSS
MARION
361
343
15
151
18
9
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/14/82(R)
03/01/88(R)
08/03/82(R)
03/01/88(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/01/88(R)
07/05/78(R)
08/31/82(R)
09/21/82(R)
01/02/79(R)
09/30/76(R)
12/31/76(R)
02/01/88(R)
02/01/88(R)
10/12/82(R)
04/15/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/28/82(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/04/87(R)
11/16/77(R)
06/01/88(R)
12/02/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/05/78(R)
08/09/77(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
10/19/82(R)
09/28/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
03/01/00(R)
09/16/88(R)
03/25/85(R)
10/12/82(R)
06/25/76(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
02/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/14/82(M)
03/01/88(L)
08/03/82(M)
05/02/91(L)
10/01/81
03/16/98
(NSFHA)
08/31/82(M)
12/20/00
01/02/79(M)
(NSFHA)
12/31/76
02/01/88(L)
12/20/00
10/12/82(M)
(NSFHA)
02/04/81
02/01/88(L)
09/28/82(M)
03/01/87(L)
08/19/91
12/20/00
02/04/98
12/02/80
07/16/80
05/17/93
07/02/92
10/13/81(M)
12/20/00
10/19/82(M)
08/16/95
12/20/00
09/21/98
05/04/00
09/04/85(M)
03/01/00(L)
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
10/12/82(M)
06/25/76
02/01/88(L)
02/04/98
08/15/80
02/01/88(L)
Page 7 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 10 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050376#
050378
050379A
050380
050017A
050381#
050303
050382
050305
050010#
050474
050392
050393#
050024A
050398#
050601#
050400
050568#
05001 1#
050402
050320
050408#
050585#
050019A
050600#
050224A
050243#
050245
050594#
050329
050435#
050246
050247
050249
050251
050225A
050439#
050441#
050337#
050260
050569#
050580#
050479#
050446#
050340#
050586#
050262A
050449A
Areas Which Have
Community Name
** ARKANSAS
ADONA, CITY OF
ALICIA, TOWN OF
ALLPORT, TOWN OF
ALMYRA, TOWN OF
ALPENA, TOWN OF
ALTUS, CITY OF
AMITY, CITY OF
ASH FLAT, TOWN OF
BARLING, CITY OF
BAXTER COUNTY
BODCAW, TOWN OF
BONANZA, TOWN OF
BRANCH, CITY OF
CARROLL COUNTY
CAVE SPRINGS, CITY OF
CENTRAL CITY, TOWN OF
CHIDESTER, CITY OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
COTTER, CITY OF
COY, TOWN OF
DIERKS, CITY OF
DYER, TOWN OF
EGYPT, TOWN OF
EVERTON, TOWN OF
FOURCHE, CITY OF
GARNER, TOWN OF
GASSVILLE, CITY OF
GILMORE, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GREEN FOREST, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY
GREERS FERRY, CITY OF
GRIFFITHVILLE, TOWN OF
GUM SPRINGS, TOWN OF
HARTMAN, TOWN OF
HIGGINSON, TOWN OF
IZARD COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
KIBLER, CITY OF
KNOXVILLE, TOWN OF
LAFE, TOWN OF
LAKEVIEW, CITY OF
LITTLE FLOCK, TOWN OF
LITTLE RIVER COUNTY*
LONDON, TOWN OF
LONSDALE, TOWN OF
LOU ANN, TOWN OF
MADISON COUNTY
Had Special Flood Hazard Areas
—Not In The Program—
County
PERRY
LAWRENCE
LONOKE
ARKANSAS
BOONE
FRANKLIN
CLARK
SHARP
SEBASTIAN
BAXTER
NEVADA
SEBASTIAN
FRANKLIN
CARROLL
BENTON
SEBASTIAN
OUACHITA
YELL
BAXTER
LONOKE
HOWARD
CRAWFORD
CRAIGHEAD
BOONE
PERRY
WHITE
BAXTER
CRITTENDEN
WASHINGTON
CARROLL
GREENE
CLEBURNE
WHITE
CLARK
JOHNSON
WHITE
IZARD
JOHNSON
CRAWFORD
JOHNSON
GREENE
BAXTER
BENTON
LITTLE RIVER
POPE
GARLAND
OUACHITA
MADISON
Identified
Hazard Area
Identified
07/06/98(F)
07/11/75
10/05/82(F)
08/15/75
08/30/74
07/17/97(F)
02/21/75
06/27/75
02/14/75
04/16/90(F)
11/19/76
08/15/75
07/17/97(F)
06/14/77
09/1 8/9 1(F)
03/16/98(F)
07/25/75
04/24/79
06/30/76(F)
06/25/76
02/14/75
08/05/91(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
08/30/74
07/06/98(F)
11/07/75(F)
10/31/78(F)
06/27/75
09/1 8/9 1(F)
04/25/75
12/13/77
04/23/76
09/26/75
06/27/75
10/29/76
08/16/74
07/12/77
08/02/77
08/05/91(F)
02/21/75
07/10/79
04/16/90(F)
09/1 8/9 1(F)
01/07/98(F)
07/13/82(F)
02/1 5/9 1(F)
10/15/85(F)
06/14/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/06/85(W)
07/11/76
08/16/88(8)
08/15/76
08/30/75
07/25/76
02/21/76
06/27/76
02/14/76
10/06/87(W)
11/19/77
08/15/76
05/02/76
06/14/78
10/29/77
03/16/99
07/25/76
04/24/80
09/06/89(8)
06/25/77
02/14/76
07/11/76
09/27/92
08/30/75
07/06/99
08/30/75
08/16/88(8)
10/21/85(W)
09/18/92
09/06/85(W)
12/13/78
04/23/77
09/26/76
06/27/76
10/29/77
08/16/75
07/12/78
08/02/78
06/25/77
02/21/76
07/10/80
04/16/91
06/21/78
01/07/99
08/16/88(8)
02/15/92
08/16/88(8)
06/14/78
Page 9 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
050450#
050347
050343
050266
050069
050095
050570#
050477#
050454A
050271
050270#
050007A
050275
050363
050473#
050458#
050281
050478
050040A
050475
050286
050465#
050290
050292
050106B
050021#
050296
050298
050598#
050571#
050009#
050299#
050077A
050469#
Community Name
MARION COUNTY
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MCNEIL, CITY OF
MENIFEE, TOWN OF
MITCHELLVILLE, TOWN OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, TOWN OF
MOUNT VERNON, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN PINE, CITY OF
NEVADA COUNTY
O'KEAN, TOWN OF
OGDEN, CITY OF
PARKDALE, TOWN OF
PERLA, TOWN OF
PLAINVIEW, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY *
POPE COUNTY *
RAVENDEN SPRINGS, TOWN OF
READER, TOWN OF
RISON, CITY OF
ROSSTON, TOWN OF
SCRANTON, TOWN OF
STONE COUNTY*
SULPHUR ROCK, TOWN OF
THORNTON, CITY OF
TUPELO, CITY OF
VALLEY SPRINGS, TOWN OF
VIOLA, TOWN OF
WICKES, TOWN OF
WIEDERKEHR VILLAGE, CITY OF
WILLISVILLE, TOWN OF
WILMOT, CITY OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
WINCHESTER, TOWN OF
YELL COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
MARION
SEARCY
COLUMBIA
CONWAY
DESHA
IZARD
FAULKNER
GARLAND
NEVADA
RANDOLPH
LITTLE RIVER
ASHLEY
HOT SPRING
YELL
POLK
POPE
RANDOLPH
OUACHITA
CLEVELAND
NEVADA
LOGAN
STONE
INDEPENDENCE
CALHOUN
JACKSON
BOONE
FULTON
POLK
FRANKLIN
NEVADA
ASHLEY
LITTLE RIVER
DREW
YELL
0
8
4
72
72
Hazard Area
Identified
09/06/77
04/25/75
05/02/75
04/25/75
11/08/74
1 1/22/74
09/27/9 1(F)
02/1 5/9 1(F)
08/09/77
04/18/75
01/07/98(F)
03/29/74
06/25/76
04/18/75
10/18/77
12/20/77
07/23/76
06/03/77
03/08/74
02/18/77
04/18/75
07/16/87(F)
04/25/75
07/25/75
01/23/79(F)
07/18/78
04/09/76
06/27/75
07/17/97(F)
03/13/79
03/15/82(F)
01/07/98(F)
08/30/74
11/15/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/06/78
04/25/76
05/02/76
04/25/76
11/08/75
1 1/22/75
01/08/81
02/15/92
08/09/78
04/18/76
09/19/76
03/29/75
06/25/77
04/18/76
10/18/78
12/20/78
07/23/77
06/03/78
03/08/75
02/18/78
04/18/76
09/06/89(8)
04/25/76
07/25/76
08/16/88(8)
07/18/79
04/09/77
06/27/76
07/17/98
03/13/80
03/15/82(8)
04/11/76
08/30/75
11/15/78
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 10 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060639#
065072#
060763#
06000 1#
060002#
060003#
060095
060632#
060193#
060015E
060755#
060213#
060359#
06002 1#
060026#
060752#
065014
06006 1#
060305#
060097
060076#
060700#
060312
060189
060240#
060098#
065073#
065015
060077#
060100
060246#
06027 1#
060247#
060656
Communities Participating in
Community Name
"CALIFORNIA
ADELANTO, CITY OF
AGOURA HILLS, CITY OF
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS TRIBE
Use the Riverside County [060245] FIRM dated 9-30-92
Use the Cities of Cathedral City [060704]; Palm Springs
[060257] FIRMs dated 6-18-96
ALAMEDA COUNTY*
ALAMEDA, CITY OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALHAMBRA, CITY OF
ALPINE COUNTY*
ALTURAS, CITY OF
AMADOR COUNTY *
AMERICAN CANYON, CITY OF
USE THE NAPA COUNTY [060205] FIRM.
ANAHEIM, CITY OF
ANDERSON, CITY OF
ANGELS, CITY OF
ANTIOCH, CITY OF
APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF
USE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY [060270] FIRM.
ARCADIA, CITY OF
ARCATA, CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, CITY OF
ARTESIA, CITY OF
ARVIN, CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CITY OF
ATHERTON, TOWN OF
ATWATER, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AVALON, CITY OF
AVENAL, CITY OF
AZUSA, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK, CITY OF
BANNING, CITY OF
BARSTOW, CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CITY OF
BELL GARDENS, CITY OF
the National Flood Program
County
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ALPINE COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
CALAVERAS COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
SAN MATED COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/80(R)
03/04/86(R)
06/21/96(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
03/11/80(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/19/89(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/11/94(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/01/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/16/95(R)
09/07/84(R)
05/02/83(R)
09/19/84(R)
03/30/79(R)
01/13/88(R)
01/20/82(R)
10/28/77(R)
11/01/79(R)
1 2/23/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/05/89(R)
09/07/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
05/26/78(R)
10/17/78(R)
02/01/80(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/17/97
08/03/98
02/09/00
07/16/91
02/01/80
(NSFHA)
11/19/87
10/20/99
06/06/00
01/03/97
09/20/95
05/19/97
09/04/87
01/17/97
11/05/97
09/19/84
(NSFHA)
08/04/87
01/20/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
11/01/85
03/07/00
05/01/85
(NSFHA)
06/17/91
01/17/97
10/17/78
(NSFHA)
Page 1 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060101
060102#
065016#
060429B
060368#
060004#
060655
06073 1#
060437#
060074#
06043 8#
060248
065017
060066
0602 14#
060439
0603 14#
060757#
060215#
065018#
065019#
0600 17#
060749#
060633#
060067#
060440#
060740#
060068
060206#
065020#
060338#
060753#
060354#
060285#
060196
060332#
060107#
060704#
Community Name
BELL, CITY OF
BELLFLOWER, CITY OF
BELMONT, CITY OF
BELVEDERE, CITY OF
BENICIA, CITY OF
BERKELEY, CITY OF
BEVERLY HILLS, CITY OF
BIG BEAR LAKE, CITY OF
BIGGS, CITY OF
BISHOP, CITY OF
BLUE LAKE, CITY OF
BLYTHE, CITY OF
BRADBURY, CITY OF
BRAWLEY, CITY OF
BREA, CITY OF
BRENTWOOD, CITY OF
BRISBANE, CITY OF
BUELLTON, CITY OF
USE THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY [060331] FIRM.
BUENA PARK, CITY OF
BURBANK, CITY OF
BURLINGAME, CITY OF
BUTTE COUNTY *
CALABASAS, CITY OF
USE THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY [065043] FIRM
CALAVERAS COUNTY*
CALEXICO, CITY OF
CALIFORNIA CITY, CITY OF
CALIMESA, CITY OF
USE THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY [060245] FIRM.
CALIP ATRIA, CITY OF
CALISTOGA, CITY OF
CAMARILLO, CITY OF
CAMPBELL, CITY OF
CANYON LAKE, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CANYON LAKE HAS ADOPTED THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY (060245) FIRM
DATED 11-20-96 PANELS 2060, 2070 AND 2090.
CAPITOLA, CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CITY OF
CARMEL BY THE SEA, CITY OF
CARPINTERIA, CITY OF
CARSON, CITY OF
CATHEDRAL CITY, CITY OF
County
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
BUTTE COUNTY
INYO COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
CALAVERAS COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/30/79(R)
04/30/79(R)
03/09/82(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/31/77(R)
09/01/78(R)
01/28/80(R)
03/07/89(R)
06/04/89(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/07/84(R)
08/04/78(R)
12/02/80(R)
04/15/79(R)
03/29/83(R)
10/16/95(R)
02/01/79(R)
0 1/23/8 1(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/29/89(R)
03/10/93(R)
09/05/90(R)
01/20/82(R)
01/20/82(R)
05/01/91(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/29/86(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/15/98(R)
08/15/84(R)
06/14/77(R)
12/18/97(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
11/12/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
03/09/82(M)
05/02/77
08/03/89
09/01/78
(NSFHA)
01/17/97
(NSFHA)
06/19/85
05/05/97
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
03/29/83(M)
01/03/97
01/20/99
09/16/81
04/20/00
09/05/90
01/20/82
09/19/84
(NSFHA)
09/28/79
09/29/86
12/07/82(M)
06/03/86
06/16/99
(NSFHA)
09/18/85
07/06/98
07/07/99
Page 2 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060385#
060108
060746#
060754#
060272#
065021#
060765#
060109#
060027#
060714#
060376#
060044#
060249
060045#
060316
060273#
060022D
060023#
060110
060111#
065022#
060025#
060663#
060398#
060250#
060287#
065023#
060216#
060377#
065024
060039#
060657
060114#
Community Name
CERES, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CERES HAS ADOPTED STANISLAUS
COUNTY [060384] FIRM DATED 9/29/89.
CERRITOS, CITY OF
CHICO, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CHICO HAS ADOPTED THE BUTTE
COUNTY (060017) FIRM DATED 9-29-89.
CHINO HILLS, CITY OF
CHINO, CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CITY OF
CITRUS HEIGHTS, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS HAS ADOTPED THE
SACRAMENTO COUNTY (060262) FIRM DATED
11-15-89 PANELS 0080, 0085, 0105, 0090, 0095, 0115
CLAREMONT, CITY OF
CLAYTON, CITY OF
CLEARLAKE, CITY OF
CLOVERDALE, CITY OF
CLOVIS, CITY OF
COACHELLA, CITY OF
COALINGA, CITY OF
COLMA, CITY OF
COLTON, CITY OF
COLUSA COUNTY *
COLUSA, CITY OF
COMMERCE, CITY OF
COMPTON, CITY OF
CONCORD, CITY OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY*
CORCORAN, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CORCORAN HAS ADOPTED THE KINGS
COUNTY (060086) FIRM
DATED 8-4-88.
CORNING, CITY OF
CORONA, CITY OF
CORONADO, CITY OF
CORTE MADERA, TOWN OF
COSTA MESA, CITY OF
COT ATI, CITY OF
CO VINA, CITY OF
CRESCENT CITY, CITY OF
CUDAHY, CITY OF
CULVER CITY, CITY OF
County
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
TEHAMA COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
DEL NORTE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/07/97(R)
02/20/79(R)
06/11/97(R)
07/11/97(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/15/83(R)
10/15/97(R)
09/07/84(R)
12/04/79(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/23/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/15/79(R)
03/30/79(R)
07/05/84(R)
07/16/87(R)
1 l/28/97(R)
08/16/82(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/01/82(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/30/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
1 l/23/82(R)
12/30/83(R)
02/01/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
04/20/00
01/17/97
01/17/97
06/16/99
1 1/20/00
12/04/79
08/03/92
07/16/96
10/16/96
(NSFHA)
07/16/96
(NSFHA)
01/17/97
08/03/98
08/03/98
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
09/27/84
05/20/96
09/27/91
06/18/96
06/16/99
12/15/77
01/03/97
12/05/96
(NSFHA)
09/29/86
(NSFHA)
02/01/80
Page 3 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060339#
0602 17#
060317
060736#
060707#
060424#
060288#
065025#
060197#
060078
06025 1#
06074 1#
060403#
060369#
060443
060645#
065026
060705#
060363#
060708#
060289#
060670
065027#
060040#
060658
060308#
060118
060005
060726#
060644
060290#
060364#
060062#
060404
060175#
060370#
060405#
060445#
060415#
060046#
060263#
060274#
060184#
060365#
Community Name
CUPERTINO, CITY OF
CYPRESS, CITY OF
DALY CITY, CITY OF
DANA POINT, CITY OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DAVIS, CITY OF
DEL MAR, CITY OF
DEL NORTE COUNTY*
DEL REY OAKS, CITY OF
DELANO, CITY OF
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, CITY OF
USE THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY [065043] FIRM.
DINUBA, CITY OF
DIXON, CITY OF
DOS PALOS, CITY OF
DOWNEY, CITY OF
DUARTE, CITY OF
DUBLIN, CITY OF
DUNSMUIR, CITY OF
EAST PALO ALTO, CITY OF
EL CAJON, CITY OF
EL CENTRO, CITY OF
EL CERRITO, CITY OF
EL DORADO COUNTY
EL MONTE, CITY OF
EL PASO DE ROBLES, CITY OF
EL SEGUNDO, CITY OF
EMERYVILLE, CITY OF
ENCINITAS, CITY OF
ESCALON, CITY OF
ESCONDIDO, CITY OF
ETNA, CITY OF
EUREKA, CITY OF
EXETER, CITY OF
FAIRFAX, TOWN OF
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
FARMERSVILLE, CITY OF
FERNDALE, CITY OF
FILLMORE, CITY OF
FIREBAUGH, CITY OF
FOLSOM, CITY OF
FONTANA, CITY OF
FORT BRAGG, CITY OF
FORT JONES, TOWN OF
County
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
YOLO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
DEL NORTE COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
MENDOCINO
COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/80(R)
02/12/79(R)
07/31/79(R)
09/26/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/15/83(R)
01/24/83(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
08/23/82(R)
04/02/79(R)
07/31/91(R)
11/03/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/30/9 1(R)
09/07/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/19/84(R)
09/01/77(R)
08/04/78(R)
06/01/77(R)
04/09/86(R)
06/16/99(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/21/78(R)
07/15/88(R)
02/22/99
09/15/83(R)
03/04/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
08/24/81(R)
01/05/78(R)
07/05/84(R)
12/15/83(R)
12/01/93(R)
10/17/78(R)
08/23/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
06/04/87(R)
12/07/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/01/80
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
01/03/97
09/27/85
11/15/79
06/16/99
07/03/86
11/04/81
(NSFHA)
09/30/88
11/03/82
05/19/81
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
09/17/97
12/04/79
08/23/99
06/16/99
(NSFHA)
06/01/77
10/18/95
(NSFHA)
09/16/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/16/99
06/16/99
03/04/80
06/17/86
(NSFHA)
01/05/78
09/15/93
12/15/83
01/07/98
02/01/84
11/20/98
09/30/92
01/17/97
06/16/92
04/15/80
Page 4 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060743#
060063#
0603 18#
060218#
060047#
065028#
065029#
060048#
060219#
060264#
060220#
060119#
060340#
065030
065031
060057#
060198#
06021 1#
060446
060019#
060306#
060333
060319#
060088#
065032
060123
065033#
060378#
060253#
060434#
060124
060733#
060125
060732#
060320#
060268#
060070#
060060#
065034#
060049
06029 1#
Community Name
FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE
INCLUDES ALL AREAS OF THE FORT MOJAVE
INDIAN RESERVATIONS OF ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA,
AND NEVADA
FORTUNA, CITY OF
FOSTER CITY, CITY OF
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF
FOWLER, CITY OF
FREMONT, CITY OF
FRESNO COUNTY *
FRESNO, CITY OF
FULLERTON, CITY OF
GALT, CITY OF
GARDEN GROVE, CITY OF
GARDENA, CITY OF
GILROY, CITY OF
GLENDALE, CITY OF
GLENDORA, CITY OF
GLENN COUNTY *
GONZALES, CITY OF
GRASS VALLEY, CITY OF
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
GRIDLEY, CITY OF
GROVER BEACH, CITY OF
GUADALUPE, CITY OF
HALF MOON BAY, CITY OF
HANFORD,CITY OF
HAWAIIAN GARDENS, CITY OF
HAWTHORNE, CITY OF
HAYWARD, CITY OF
HEALDSBURG, CITY OF
HEMET, CITY OF
HERCULES, CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CITY OF
HESPERIA, CITY OF
HIDDEN HILLS, CITY OF
HIGHLAND, CITY OF
HILLSBOROUGH, TOWN OF
HOLLISTER, CITY OF
HOLTVILLE, CITY OF
HUMBOLDT COUNTY*
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF
HURON, CITY OF
IMPERIAL BEACH, CITY OF
County
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
NEVADA COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN MATED COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/96(R)
05/03/82(R)
01/07/77(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/02/83(R)
12/01/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
07/05/77(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/30/82(R)
04/21/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/31/84(R)
11/18/75(R)
09/03/80(R)
11/18/81(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/23/82(R)
04/25/97(R)
08/01/84(R)
04/30/82(R)
08/08/79(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/01/76(R)
08/13/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
03/04/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/23/82(R)
10/19/89(R)
09/07/84(R)
10/19/89(R)
09/01/81(R)
06/19/85(R)
01/20/82(R)
07/19/82(R)
02/16/83(R)
09/01/81(R)
06/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
05/03/82
01/19/95
01/03/97
09/24/84(M)
02/09/00
11/20/98
10/16/96
01/03/97
08/16/95
01/03/97
07/06/98
08/17/98
(NSFHA)
06/05/97
11/18/81
02/05/97
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/05/97
(NSFHA)
06/03/86
03/18/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/09/00
10/18/83
08/19/97
09/30/82
(NSFHA)
01/17/97
01/17/97
10/06/99
09/27/91
01/20/82
02/08/99
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
06/16/99
Page 5 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060065#
060071
060254#
060255#
065035
065036
060073#
060016#
060222#
060129
060265#
060448#
060075#
060199#
060086#
060050
060669
060701
060224#
060292#
060131#
060225#
065039
060709#
060133
065037#
060223#
060760
060764#
060090#
060636#
060759#
065038#
060130#
060672#
065040#
060092#
060738
Community Name
IMPERIAL COUNTY *
IMPERIAL, CITY OF
INDIAN WELLS, CITY OF
INDIO, CITY OF
INDUSTRY, CITY OF
INGLEWOOD, CITY OF
INYO COUNTY *
IONE, CITY OF
IRVINE, CITY OF
IRWINDALE, CITY OF
ISLETON,CITY OF
JACKSON, CITY OF
KERN COUNTY
KING CITY, CITY OF
KINGS COUNTY *
KINGSBURG, CITY OF
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CITY OF
LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CITY OF
LA HABRA, CITY OF
LA MESA, CITY OF
LA MIRADA, CITY OF
LA PALMA, CITY OF
LA PUENTE, CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CITY OF
LA VERNE, CITY OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAGUNA BEACH, CITY OF
LAGUNA HILLS, CITY OF
THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS HAS ADOPTED THE
ORANGE COUNTY (060212) FIRM DATED 1-3-97.
LAGUNA NIGUEL, CITY OF
THE CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL HAD ADOPTED THE
ORANGE COUNTY (060212)
FIRM DATED 1/3/97.
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF
LAKE FOREST, CITY OF
USE THE ORANGE COUNTY [060212] FIRM.
LAKEPORT, CITY OF
LAKEWOOD, CITY OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LARKSPUR, CITY OF
LAS SEN COUNTY*
LATHROP, CITY OF
County
IMPERIAL COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
INYO COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
LASSEN COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/15/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/07/84(R)
02/20/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/08/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
02/12/79(R)
12/01/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/04/88(R)
11/30/83(R)
09/07/84(R)
09/07/84(R)
02/15/80(R)
06/26/76(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/21/78(R)
05/25/78(R)
07/01/85(R)
09/07/84(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/28/79(R)
10/31/97(R)
10/09/97(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/15/94(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/15/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/15/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
0 1/28/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/15/84
(NSFHA)
01/19/82
05/01/85
(NSFHA)
08/05/86
06/06/00
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
07/02/87
07/17/97
09/06/95
10/15/81
08/04/88
(NSFHA)
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
07/02/80
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
08/19/91
05/20/96
01/03/97
03/02/98
06/18/96
09/28/90
07/06/98
01/06/82
04/17/84
09/04/87
(NSFHA)
Page 6 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060134
060723#
060089#
06024 1#
060406#
060395#
060008#
060450#
060300#
065042#
060135
060334#
060136#
06072 1#
060226#
060342#
060341#
065043#
060137#
060747#
060343#
060361#
060635#
060170#
060172#
060745#
060724#
060138
060706
060079#
060173#
060727#
065044#
060428#
060651
060080#
060183#
Community Name
LAWNDALE, CITY OF
LEMON GROVE, CITY OF
LEMOORE,CITY OF
LINCOLN, CITY OF
LINDSAY, CITY OF
LIVE OAK, CITY OF
LIVERMORE, CITY OF
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LODI,CITY OF
LOMA LINDA, CITY OF
LOMITA, CITY OF
LOMPOC, CITY OF
LONG BEACH, CITY OF
LOOMIS, TOWN OF
LOS ALAMITOS, CITY OF
LOS ALTOS HILLS, TOWN OF
LOS ALTOS, CITY OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY*
LOS ANGELES, CITY OF
LOS BANDS, CITY OF
USE THE MERCED COUNTY (060188) FIRM DATED
8-2-95.
LOS GATOS, TOWN OF
LOY ALTON, CITY OF
LYNWOOD, CITY OF
MADERA COUNTY*
MADERA,CITY OF
MALIBU, CITY OF
USE THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY [065043] FIRM
MAMMOTH LAKES, TOWN OF
MANHATTAN BEACH, CITY OF
MANTECA, CITY OF
MARICOPA, CITY OF
MARIN COUNTY*
MARINA, CITY OF
MARTINEZ, CITY OF
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MAYWOOD, CITY OF
MCFARLAND, CITY OF
MENDOCINO COUNTY *
County
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
SUTTER COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MADERA COUNTY
MADERA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
YUBA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
MENDOCINO
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/30/78(R)
11/14/97(R)
04/03/87(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/28/84(R)
03/23/84(R)
07/05/77(R)
05/25/78(R)
03/01/78(R)
07/16/87(R)
06/03/78(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
12/29/86(R)
03/16/79(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
12/02/80(R)
12/02/80(R)
02/03/98(R)
01/17/79(R)
11/10/93(R)
04/15/80(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
10/01/92(R)
08/02/94(R)
05/08/78(R)
07/16/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/26/88(R)
03/15/78(R)
01/19/78(R)
04/30/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
06/01/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
06/16/99
04/03/87
06/08/98
09/28/84
03/23/84(M)
09/17/97
08/02/95
06/18/87
01/17/97
(NSFHA)
06/05/97
07/06/98
06/08/98
01/03/97
01/02/80
07/16/80
07/06/98
05/04/99
01/17/79
06/08/98
07/06/98
06/06/01
06/04/87
09/30/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
05/05/97
02/03/93
03/15/78
08/10/82
(NSFHA)
09/29/86
06/16/92
Page 7 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
06005 1#
060321#
060188#
060191#
060177#
065045#
060344#
060735#
060387#
060192#
060194C
065046
06045 1#
060276#
060345
060141#
060195#
065047
060200#
060712#
060637#
065074#
060346#
060307#
060347#
06075 1#
060205#
060207#
060293#
060277#
060453
060210#
060009#
060388#
060227#
060256#
060652
060178#
060389#
065048#
060766
060294#
Community Name
MENDOTA, CITY OF
MENLO PARK, CITY OF
MERCED COUNTY *
MERCED, CITY OF
MILL VALLEY, CITY OF
MILLBRAE, CITY OF
MILPITAS, CITY OF
MISSION VIEJO, CIY OF
MODESTO, CITY OF
MODOC COUNTY *
MONO COUNTY *
MONROVIA, CITY OF
MONTAGUE,CITY OF
MONTCLAIR, CITY OF
MONTE SERENO, CITY OF
MONTEBELLO, CITY OF
MONTEREY COUNTY *
MONTEREY PARK, CITY OF
MONTEREY, CITY OF
MOORPARK, CITY OF
MORAGA, TOWN OF
MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF
MORGAN HILL, CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF
MURRIETA, CITY OF
USE THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY [060260] FIRM
NAPA COUNTY *
NAP A, CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY, CITY OF
NEEDLES, CITY OF
NEVADA CITY, CITY OF
NEVADA COUNTY*
NEWARK, CITY OF
NEWMAN, CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CITY OF
NORCO, CITY OF
NORWALK, CITY OF
NOVATO, CITY OF
OAKDALE, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
OAKLEY, CITY OF
OCEANSIDE, CITY OF
County
FRESNO COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MERCED COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
MODOC COUNTY
MONO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
NEVADA COUNTY
NEVADA COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/81(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
01/03/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/26/89(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/07/84(R)
06/27/83(R)
08/23/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
03/18/80(R)
01/30/84(R)
1 1/30/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
06/18/87(R)
06/18/80(R)
12/18/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
06/09/93(R)
02/01/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/15/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
11/20/97
01/19/83(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
02/15/79(R)
02/19/79(R)
01/19/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/30/82(R)
10/30/00(R)
09/05/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/27/91
04/21/99
08/02/95
08/02/95
01/03/79
09/30/81
06/22/98
01/03/97
05/07/01
10/20/99
06/05/97
09/17/80
01/17/97
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
09/27/91
(NSFHA)
06/17/86
09/29/86
05/19/81
05/17/93
12/22/98
11/01/85
06/19/97
11/20/96
09/28/90
01/19/00
06/16/99
01/17/97
02/05/97
02/09/00
01/03/90
01/03/97
02/15/79
(NSFHA)
09/29/89
09/05/79
09/30/82
01/19/01
Page 8 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060416#
060278#
060212#
060052#
060228#
060722#
060020#
060417#
060201
060323#
060629#
060257#
060144#
060348#
060145
060748#
065049#
060454#
065050
060390#
060258#
060379#
060148#
060011
060032#
060309#
060033#
060229#
060239#
06004 1#
060034#
060012#
060244B
060455A
060185#
060149
065051#
060407#
065052#
060456#
060702#
06067 1#
060259#
Community Name
OJAI, CITY OF
ONTARIO, CITY OF
ORANGE COUNTY *
ORANGE COVE, CITY OF
ORANGE, CITY OF
GRIND A, CITY OF
OROVILLE, CITY OF
OXNARD, CITY OF
PACIFIC GROVE, CITY OF
PACIFICA, CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CITY OF
PALMDALE,CITY OF
PALO ALTO, CITY OF
PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CITY OF
PARADISE, TOWN OF
PARAMOUNT, CITY OF
PARLIER, CITY OF
PASADENA, CITY OF
PATTERSON, CITY OF
FERRIS, CITY OF
PETALUMA, CITY OF
PICO RIVERA, CITY OF
PIEDMONT, CITY OF
PINOLE, CITY OF
PISMO BEACH, CITY OF
PITTSBURG,CITY OF
PLACENTIA, CITY OF
PLACER COUNTY*
PLACERVILLE, CITY OF
PLEASANT HILL, CITY OF
PLEASANTON, CITY OF
PLUMAS COUNTY *
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
POINT ARENA, CITY OF
POMONA, CITY OF
PORT HUENEME, CITY OF
PORTERVILLE, CITY OF
PORTOLA VALLEY, TOWN OF
PORTOLA, CITY OF
POWAY, CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF
RANCHO MIRAGE, CITY OF
County
VENTURA COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
ORANGE COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
PLUMAS COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
MENDOCINO
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
PLUMAS COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/17/78(R)
12/02/80(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/30/83(R)
05/01/87(R)
02/10/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
01/12/98(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
03/02/83(R)
01/06/82(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/07/84(R)
06/08/98(R)
02/20/79(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/07/84(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/16/79(R)
02/15/80(R)
04/15/79(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/01/84(R)
08/15/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
04/18/83(R)
09/30/83(R)
09/30/83(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/01/90(R)
08/03/84(R)
09/07/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/18/83(R)
10/17/78(R)
07/18/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/05/84(R)
09/14/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/19/83
01/17/97
01/03/97
09/30/83
01/03/97
07/17/97
04/20/00
10/15/85
(NSFHA)
02/19/87
06/18/96
07/07/99
03/30/98
06/02/99
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
07/20/84(M)
01/03/90
07/02/92
09/29/89
07/06/98
(NSFHA)
08/15/80
11/05/97
07/02/87
01/03/97
06/08/98
09/30/83
09/30/83
09/30/97
09/24/84(M)
12/01/90(L)
06/03/86
09/24/84(M)
10/15/85
09/22/81
04/15/92
06/16/99
01/17/97
06/18/96
Page 9 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060464
065053#
060360#
060279#
060150#
060325#
060053#
060280#
060035#
060081#
060064#
060371#
060457#
060391
060245#
060260#
060242#
060380#
065054
060151
060153
060243#
060179#
060262#
060266#
060202#
060180#
060267#
060270#
060281#
060326
060419#
060327#
060230#
060284#
060295#
060154#
060628
065055
065056#
Community Name
RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CITY OF
RED BLUFF, CITY OF
REDDING, CITY OF
REDLANDS, CITY OF
REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF
REDWOOD CITY, CITY OF
REEDLEY, CITY OF
RIALTO, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RIDGECREST, CITY OF
RIO DELL, CITY OF
RIO VISTA,CITY OF
RIPON, CITY OF
RIVERBANK, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY *
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
ROCKLIN, CITY OF
ROHNERT PARK, CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF
ROSS, TOWN OF
SACRAMENTO COUNTY *
SACRAMENTO, CITY OF
SALINAS, CITY OF
SAN ANSELMO, TOWN OF
SAN BENITO COUNTY*
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY *
SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF
SAN BRUNO, CITY OF
SAN BUENAVENTURA, CITY OF
SAN CARLOS, CITY OF
SAN CLEMENTE, CITY OF
SAN DIEGO COUNTY *
SAN DIEGO, CITY OF
SAN DIMAS, CITY OF
SAN FERNANDO, CITY OF
SAN GABRIEL, CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CITY OF
County
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
TEHAMA COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
PLACER COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN MATED COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/07/84(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/15/83(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
02/12/79(R)
03/01/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/03/97(R)
04/15/80(R)
01/06/83(R)
05/15/84(R)
06/01/81(R)
1 1/30/79(R)
05/26/78(R)
04/15/79(R)
12/15/83(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/15/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/15/77(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/15/84(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/01/77(R)
02/11/76(R)
1 l/23/73(R)
09/28/73(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/16/96
03/02/98
01/17/97
09/15/83
05/17/82
09/30/82
01/17/97
11/17/93
01/06/82
05/03/82
08/04/87
09/24/84(M)
(NSFHA)
11/20/96
08/02/96
06/08/98
06/01/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
02/04/81
07/06/98
07/06/98
11/04/81
12/01/77
09/27/91
01/17/97
01/17/97
(NSFHA)
08/19/87
08/21/79
01/03/97
06/16/99
06/16/99
06/02/78
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/17/90
Page 10 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060299#
060055
060349#
060269#
06023 1#
060013#
060304#
060310#
060296#
065057
06031 1#
060328
060036#
065058#
060710#
060435#
060054#
060232#
06033 1#
060335#
060337#
060350#
060729#
060353#
060355#
060158#
060336#
060159
060420#
060381#
060703#
06035 1#
060182#
060356#
060233#
060203#
060382#
060082#
060358#
060758#
Community Name
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY*
SAN JOAQUIN, CITY OF
SAN JOSE, CITY OF
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA, CITY OF
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CITY OF
SAN LEANDRO, CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY *
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF
SAN MARCOS, CITY OF
SAN MARINO, CITY OF
SAN MATED COUNTY *
SAN MATED, CITY OF
SAN PABLO, CITY OF
SAN RAFAEL, CITY OF
SAN RAMON, CITY OF
SAND CITY, CITY OF
SANGER, CITY OF
SANTA ANA, CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY *
SANTA BARBARA, CITY OF
SANTA CLARA COUNTY*
SANTA CLARA, CITY OF
SANTA CLARITA, CITY OF
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY *
SANTA CRUZ, CITY OF
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CITY OF
SANTA MARIA, CITY OF
SANTA MONICA, CITY OF
SANTA PAULA, CITY OF
SANTA ROSA, CITY OF
SANTEE, CITY OF
SARATOGA, CITY OF
SAUSALITO, CITY OF
SCOTTS VALLEY, CITY OF
SEAL BEACH, CITY OF
SEASIDE, CITY OF
SEBASTOPOL, CITY OF
SHAFTER, CITY OF
SHASTA COUNTY *
SHASTA LAKE, CITY OF
County
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
SAN BENITO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
FRESNO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
SHASTA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/80(R)
04/30/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/14/79(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/05/82(R)
04/16/79(R)
08/01/78(R)
04/30/79(R)
07/05/84(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
08/01/77(R)
05/01/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/14/79(R)
03/15/79(R)
12/15/78(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/23/89(R)
04/15/86(R)
02/15/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/01/81(R)
04/30/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/28/84(R)
01/17/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
10/18/83(R)
07/03/78(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
10/22/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/05/97
(NSFHA)
08/17/98
09/27/91
01/03/97
02/09/00
06/03/91
07/07/81
06/16/99
(NSFHA)
08/05/86
(NSFHA)
11/17/93
01/03/97
05/03/90
06/03/86
12/01/82
01/03/97
07/07/99
12/03/91
08/17/98
01/20/99
09/29/89
04/15/86
06/17/86
04/15/80
05/06/96
(NSFHA)
09/03/97
08/03/81
06/16/99
07/03/97
09/30/80
10/18/83
01/03/97
08/19/86
09/28/90
09/29/89
06/16/99
06/16/99
Page 11 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060630#
065059
060161
06042 1#
060362#
060725#
06063 1#
060204#
060756#
060375#
060383#
060412
060162
060163#
065060#
065061
065062#
060208#
060384#
060234#
060302#
060372#
060352#
060093#
060394#
060458#
065063#
060084#
065064#
060400#
060742#
060422#
060430A
060165#
060303#
06040 1#
060762#
065066#
065065#
06041 1#
Community Name
USE THE SHASTA COUNTY (060358) FIRM DATED
9-20-95.
SIERRA COUNTY *
SIERRA MADRE, CITY OF
SIGNAL HILL, CITY OF
SIMI VALLEY, CITY OF
SISKIYOU COUNTY*
SOLANA BEACH, CITY OF
SOLANO COUNTY *
SOLEDAD, CITY OF
SOLVANG, CITY OF
THE CITY OF SOLVANG HAS ADOPTED THE SANTA
BARBARA COUNTY (060331) FIRM DATED 6-5-97.
SONOMA COUNTY *
SONOMA, CITY OF
SONORA, CITY OF
SOUTH EL MONTE, CITY OF
SOUTH GATE, CITY OF
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CITY OF
SOUTH PASADENA, CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF
ST. HELENA, CITY OF
STANISLAUS COUNTY *
STANTON, CITY OF
STOCKTON, CITY OF
SUISUN CITY, CITY OF
SUNNYVALE, CITY OF
SUSANVILLE, CITY OF
SUTTER COUNTY*
SUTTER CREEK, CITY OF
TAFT, CITY OF
TEHACHAPI, CITY OF
TEHAMA COUNTY*
TEHAMA, CITY OF
TEMECULA, CITY OF
THOUSAND OAKS, CITY OF
TIBURON, CITY OF
TORRANCE, CITY OF
TRACY, CITY OF
TRINITY COUNTY *
TRUCKEE, TOWN OF
USE THE NEVADA COUNTY [060210] FIRM.
TULARE COUNTY*
TULARE, CITY OF
TUOLUMNE COUNTY*
County
SIERRA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
MONTEREY COUNTY
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
EL DORADO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
LASSEN COUNTY
SUTTER COUNTY
AMADOR COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
TEHAMA COUNTY
TEHAMA COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
MARIN COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY
TRINITY COUNTY
NEVADA COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/12/93(R)
09/07/84(R)
03/30/79(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/19/89(R)
08/02/82(R)
1 1/30/78(R)
10/09/97(R)
01/20/82(R)
01/17/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
11/14/75(R)
04/15/79(R)
07/03/78(R)
11/14/75(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
03/16/79(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/01/82(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/05/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/23/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/17/80(R)
08/28/91(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/16/77(R)
12/18/79(R)
12/22/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
05/17/95(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/05/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/08/98
(NSFHA)
09/03/97
05/19/87
06/16/99
05/07/01
05/15/84
06/19/97
06/05/97
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/06/98
07/03/78
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
01/07/98
05/07/01
01/03/97
02/04/88
06/01/82
12/19/97
06/19/85
07/06/98
09/28/90
09/30/92
06/15/82
02/05/97
02/04/87
1 1/20/96
01/03/83
05/16/77
12/18/79
06/18/87
04/17/96
10/06/98
07/05/83
09/05/90
Page 12 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
060392
060235#
060734#
060186#
0600 14#
065067#
060373#
060374#
060413#
065068#
060236#
060409#
060297#
065070#
065069
060085#
060393#
060357#
060649#
060666
060720#
060728#
060744#
060237#
060072
060460A
060169#
060024#
060187#
060059#
06076 1#
060425#
065071#
060426#
060330#
060423#
060238#
060209#
060367#
060396#
060427#
Community Name
TURLOCK, CITY OF
TUSTIN, CITY OF
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CITY OF
UKIAH, CITY OF
UNION CITY, CITY OF
UPLAND, CITY OF
VACAVILLE, CITY OF
VALLEJO, CITY OF
VENTURA COUNTY *
VICTORVILLE, CITY OF
VILLA PARK, CITY OF
VISALIA, CITY OF
VISTA, CITY OF
WALNUT CREEK, CITY OF
WALNUT, CITY OF
WASCO, CITY OF
WATERFORD, CITY OF
WATSONVILLE, CITY OF
WEED, CITY OF
WEST COVINA, CITY OF
WEST HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF
WEST SACRAMENTO, CITY OF
WESTLAKE, VILLAGE OF
USE THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY [065043] FIRM
WESTMINSTER, CITY OF
WESTMORLAND, CITY OF
WHEATLAND, CITY OF
WHITTIER, CITY OF
WILLIAMS, CITY OF
WILLITS,CITY OF
WILLOWS, CITY OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
USE THE SONOMA COUNTY [060375] FIRM
WINTERS, CITY OF
WOODLAKE, CITY OF
WOODLAND, CITY OF
WOODSIDE, TOWN OF
YOLO COUNTY*
YORBA LINDA, CITY OF
YOUNTVILLE, TOWN OF
YREKA, CITY OF
YUBA CITY, CITY OF
YUBA COUNTY *
County
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
MENDOCINO
COUNTY
ALAMEDA COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY
VENTURA COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
ORANGE COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
KERN COUNTY
STANISLAUS
COUNTY
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
YOLO COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
IMPERIAL COUNTY
YUBA COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
COLUSA COUNTY
MENDOCINO
COUNTY
GLENN COUNTY
SONOMA COUNTY
YOLO COUNTY
TULARE COUNTY
YOLO COUNTY
SAN MATED COUNTY
YOLO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
NAPA COUNTY
SISKIYOU COUNTY
SUTTER COUNTY
YUBA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/14/81(R)
09/14/79(R)
07/27/89(R)
07/19/82(R)
12/01/78(R)
1 2/23/8 1(R)
08/02/82(R)
10/17/78(R)
10/31/85(R)
09/21/73(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/05/84(R)
08/15/83(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/07/84(R)
07/04/89(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/15/84(R)
01/20/82(R)
09/07/84(R)
06/18/87(R)
03/13/90(R)
10/01/92(R)
08/08/78(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/29/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
04/22/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/04/80(R)
05/11/95(R)
12/01/78(R)
06/01/83(R)
10/16/79(R)
11/15/79(R)
12/16/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
03/28/80(R)
11/18/81(R)
03/23/84(R)
05/17/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
01/03/97
01/17/97
08/05/85
02/09/00
(NSFHA)
05/07/01
02/22/83
09/03/97
01/17/97
01/03/97
10/06/98
06/16/99
05/20/96
07/04/89
07/16/79
06/15/84
01/20/82
06/18/87
01/19/95
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
09/29/86(M)
01/16/81
11/20/96
09/30/88
12/07/82
11/20/98
06/01/83
10/13/81
11/15/79
03/23/99
01/03/97
09/28/90
11/18/81
03/23/84(M)
09/15/83
Page 13 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
060739# YUCAIPA, CITY OF
060750# YUCCA VALLEY, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNT
513
511
73
13
2
0
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
01/28/91(R) 01/17/97
03/31/93(R)
01/17/97
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 14 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"CALIFORNIA
060737# GRANDE TERRACE, CITY OF
060634# MARIPOSA COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
Hazard Area Date On Which
Identified Sanctions Apply
SAN BERNARDINO 03/18/96(F)
COUNT
MARIPOSA COUNTY 09/05/90(F)
03/18/97
11/29/78
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 15 of 15
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
080001#
080177
080009#
080010#
080230
08001 1#
080273#
085072#
080143#
080179
080002#
080308#
080052#
080098#
080271#
080296
080076#
080148
080023#
080024#
080172#
080004#
085073#
080130#
080030#
080192#
080068#
080234#
080050#
080304
080077#
080269#
080013#
080034#
080116#
080060#
080014#
080006#
080037#
080121B
080276#
080119#
Communities
Community Name
"COLORADO
ADAMS COUNTY *
AKRON, TOWN OF
ALAMOSA COUNTY *
ALAMOSA, CITY OF
ANTONITO, CITY OF
ARAPAHOE COUNTY *
ARCHULETA COUNTY *
ARVADA, CITY OF
ASPEN, CITY OF
AULT, TOWN OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AVON, TOWN OF
BASALT,TOWN OF
BAYFIELD, TOWN OF
BENT COUNTY *
BERTHOUD, TOWN OF
BLACK HAWK, CITY OF
BOONE, TOWN OF
BOULDER COUNTY *
BOULDER, CITY OF
BRECKENRIDGE, TOWN OF
BRIGHTON, CITY OF
BROOMFIELD, CITY OF
BRUSH, CITY OF
BUENA VISTA, TOWN OF
CALHAN, TOWN OF
CANON CITY, CITY OF
CARBONDALE, CITY OF
CASTLE ROCK, TOWN OF
CEDAREDGE, TOWN OF
CENTRAL CITY , CITY OF
CHAFFEE COUNTY*
CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CITY OF
CLEAR CREEK COUNTY *
COLLBRAN, TOWN OF
COLORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF
COLUMBINE VALLEY, TOWN OF
COMMERCE CITY, CITY OF
CONEJOS COUNTY *
CORTEZ, CITY OF
COSTILLA COUNTY*
CRAIG, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
ADAMS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ALAMOSA COUNTY
ALAMOSA COUNTY
CONEJOS COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
ARCHULETA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PITKIN COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
PITKIN COUNTY
LA PLATA COUNTY
BENT COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
GILPIN COUNTY
PUEBLO COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
CHAFFEE COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
GILPIN COUNTY
CHAFFEE COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
CLEAR CREEK
COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CONEJOS COUNTY
MONTEZUMA
COUNTY
COSTILLA COUNTY
MOFFAT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/01/79(R)
04/01/88(R)
01/19/78(R)
09/15/77(R)
11/05/85(R)
08/15/77(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/23/72(R)
12/04/85(R)
06/10/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/19/87(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/01/89(R)
05/26/78(R)
10/16/84(R)
07/15/85(R)
02/01/79(R)
07/17/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
11/16/77(R)
09/07/73(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/30/82(R)
03/18/86(R)
11/03/82(R)
02/05/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
05/27/93
03/01/86(R)
03/04/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
03/11/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/18/86(R)
06/15/78(R)
02/15/78(R)
11/16/90(R)
04/01/77(R)
07/16/91(R)
09/28/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/16/95
04/01/88(L)
04/21/99
04/21/99
(NSFHA)
08/16/95
01/03/79
02/19/92
09/30/88
(NSFHA)
09/07/98
08/19/87
06/04/87
09/29/78
05/01/89(L)
(NSFHA)
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
05/06/96
05/06/96
06/20/01 >
08/16/95
09/30/97
10/13/81
09/30/82
08/23/99
11/03/82
02/05/86
09/30/87
(NSFHA)
02/16/94
03/04/87
08/16/95
03/11/80(M)
04/15/82
08/23/99
08/16/95
08/16/95
11/16/90
04/01/77(M)
07/16/91(M)
09/28/84
Page 1 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
080118B
080079#
080174#
080111#
080211
080236#
080307#
080015#
080154#
080041#
080043#
080046#
080279#
080122#
080049#
080047B
080099#
08005 1#
080180#
080089#
080059#
085074#
080181#
080193#
080182#
080239A
080240#
080241#
080112
080070#
080102#
080183#
080131#
080061#
080073A
080244#
080067#
080245#
080194#
080205#
080035#
080213
080075
080071#
080090#
080144#
080117#
080214B
080184#
080062#
080195#
080078#
080080#
Community Name
CREEDE, CITY OF
CRESTED BUTTE, TOWN OF
CRIPPLE CREEK, CITY OF
CROOK, CITY OF
CROWLEY, CITY OF
DACONO, TOWN OF
DE BEQUE, TOWN OF
DEER TRAIL, CITY OF
DEL NORTE, TOWN OF
DELTA COUNTY *
DELTA, CITY OF
DENVER, CITY AND COUNTY OF
DOLORES COUNTY *
DOLORES, TOWN OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY*
DOVE CREEK, CITY OF
DURANGO, CITY OF
EAGLE COUNTY *
EATON, TOWN OF
EDGEWATER, CITY OF
EL PASO COUNTY*
ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF
ERIE, TOWN OF
ESTES PARK, TOWN OF
EVANS, CITY OF
FAIRPLAY, TOWN OF
FEDERAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF
FIRESTONE, TOWN OF
FLEMING, TOWN OF
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FORT COLLINS, CITY OF
FORT LUPTON, TOWN OF
FORT MORGAN, CITY OF
FOUNTAIN, CITY OF
FRASER, TOWN OF
FREDERICK, TOWN OF
FREMONT COUNTY *
FRISCO, TOWN OF
FRUITA, CITY OF
GARFIELD COUNTY*
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GILCREST, CITY OF
GILPIN COUNTY *
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CITY OF
GOLDEN, CITY OF
GRANADA, TOWN OF
GRAND JUNCTION, CITY OF
GRAND LAKE, CITY OF
GREELEY, CITY OF
GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF
GUNNISON COUNTY *
GUNNISON, CITY OF
County
MINERAL COUNTY
GUNNISON COUNTY
TELLER COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
CROWLEY COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
RIO GRANDE
COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
DENVER COUNTY
DOLORES COUNTY
MONTEZUMA
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DOLORES COUNTY
LA PLATA COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CLEAR CREEK
COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
GILPIN COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PROWERS COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
GUNNISON COUNTY
GUNNISON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/01/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/18/85(R)
02/05/86(R)
12/11/85(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/17/89(R)
11/05/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
03/15/84(R)
06/01/84(R)
04/15/86(R)
03/01/86(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/03/80(R)
01/01/86(R)
01/17/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/15/89(R)
12/18/86(R)
02/11/72(R)
10/17/78(R)
01/17/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
08/05/86(R)
04/15/86(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/15/85(R)
12/04/84(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
02/05/86(R)
06/05/85(R)
05/12/95
07/16/79(R)
09/29/89(R)
05/15/80(R)
12/01/81(R)
12/15/77(R)
06/05/89(R)
06/10/80(R)
03/01/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/06/83(R)
01/01/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/29/89(R)
04/18/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/01/86(L)
09/04/85(M)
09/30/88
02/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
07/16/79
04/17/89
(NSFHA)
09/30/82
08/19/91
08/19/91
09/07/98
03/01/86(L)
09/29/89
01/05/96
01/01/86(L)
05/21/01
01/25/83
09/01/82
08/15/89
08/23/99
08/16/95
09/28/90
05/04/87
04/02/79
08/05/86(M)
08/16/95
12/18/79
(NSFHA)
12/04/84
03/18/96
04/02/79
02/05/86(M)
08/23/99
03/26/76
07/13/82
09/29/89
04/26/83
07/15/92
01/03/86
06/05/89
(NSFHA)
03/01/86(L)
10/15/85
05/15/85
09/24/84(M)
07/15/92
01/01/86(L)
07/16/79
08/23/99
08/16/95
09/29/89
09/18/85
Page 2 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
080295#
080140
080157#
080081#
080145
080141#
080044#
080249
080206A
080036#
080268
080207#
080216#
080087#
080169#
080251
080057A
080038
080133#
080097#
080186
080084#
080026#
080082#
080282#
085075#
080146#
080101#
080309#
080105#
080022
080109#
080017#
080110#
080027#
085076#
080103#
080029#
080253#
080123#
080063#
080134
080197B
080151#
080115#
080187#
080284#
080053#
080270#
080155#
080285#
080124#
Community Name
GYPSUM, TOWN OF
HAXTUN, CITY OF
HAYDEN, TOWN OF
HINSDALE COUNTY*
HOLLY, TOWN OF
HOLYOKE, TOWN OF
HOTCHKISS, TOWN OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
HUERFANO COUNTY*
IDAHO SPRINGS, CITY OF
IGNACIO, TOWN OF
ILIFF, TOWN OF
JAMESTOWN, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JULESBURG, TOWN OF
KEENESBURG, TOWN OF
KIOWA, TOWN OF
LA JARA, TOWN OF
LA JUNTA, CITY OF
LA PLATA COUNTY *
LA SALLE, TOWN OF
LA VET A, TOWN OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAKE CITY, CITY OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKEWOOD, CITY OF
LAMAR, CITY OF
LARIMER COUNTY *
LARKSPUR, TOWN OF
LAS ANIMAS COUNTY*
LAS ANIMAS, CITY OF
LIMON, TOWN OF
LITTLETON, CITY OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LONGMONT, CITY OF
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LOVELAND, CITY OF
LYONS, TOWN OF
MANASSA, CITY OF
MANCOS, TOWN OF
MANITOU SPRINGS, CITY OF
MANZANOLA, TOWN OF
MARBLE, TOWN OF
MEEKER, TOWN OF
MESA COUNTY *
MILLIKEN, TOWN OF
MINERAL COUNTY *
MINTURN, TOWN OF
MOFFAT COUNTY *
MONTE VISTA, CITY OF
MONTEZUMA COUNTY *
MONTROSE COUNTY *
County
EAGLE COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
ROUTT COUNTY
HINSDALE COUNTY
PROWERS COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
HUERFANO COUNTY
CLEAR CREEK
COUNTY
LA PLATA COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
ELBERT COUNTY
CONEJOS COUNTY
OTERO COUNTY
LA PLATA COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
HUERFANO COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
HINSDALE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PROWERS COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LAS ANIMAS COUNTY
BENT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
CONEJOS COUNTY
MONTEZUMA
COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
OTERO COUNTY
GUNNISON COUNTY
RIO BLANCO COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
MOFFAT COUNTY
RIO GRANDE
COUNTY
MONTEZUMA
COUNTY
MONTROSE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/16/81(R)
12/11/85(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/20/83(R)
02/19/87(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/20/97
10/01/86(R)
11/15/78(R)
03/27/86(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/18/83(R)
08/05/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
08/24/81(R)
04/26/99
06/30/76(R)
12/01/82(R)
12/15/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/29/86(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/30/87(R)
03/01/98(R)
07/21/72(R)
11/17/82(R)
04/02/79(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/01/77(R)
07/10/85(R)
11/01/84(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/29/89(R)
07/05/77(R)
05/04/73(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
02/19/86(R)
09/29/86(R)
02/01/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/01/90(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/16/91(R)
09/17/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/04/89(R)
02/15/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/83
(NSFHA)
06/01/78
09/30/87
(NSFHA)
02/19/87
07/03/85
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
11/15/78
(NSFHA)
08/04/87
05/06/96
07/04/89
04/02/86(M)
(NSFHA)
02/27/76
(NSFHA)
12/01/82
05/21/01
(NSFHA)
09/29/86
05/06/96
09/30/87
03/01/98(L)
01/03/83
11/17/82
03/23/99
09/30/87
04/03/84
(NSFHA)
11/01/84
09/29/89
09/29/89
05/06/96
05/06/96
03/23/99
05/06/96
02/19/86(M)
09/29/86
08/23/99
(NSFHA)
10/01/90(L)
09/27/91
07/15/92
08/01/79
04/16/91
09/17/80
08/02/82
09/30/82
05/04/89
07/17/86
Page 3 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
080125#
080064#
080129#
080092#
080126#
080255#
080257#
080167#
080188#
080158#
080128#
080258#
080259#
080132#
080178#
080136#
080137#
080019#
080198#
080065#
080045#
080215#
080139#
080310#
080286
080189#
080287#
080190
080220#
080272#
080147#
085077#
080066#
080152#
080260#
080048A
080138#
085078#
080288#
080153#
080221#
080135#
080156#
08003 1#
080267#
080039A
080166#
080171#
080317#
Community Name
MONTROSE, CITY OF
MONUMENT, TOWN OF
MORGAN COUNTY *
MORRISON, TOWN OF
NATURITA, TOWN OF
NEDERLAND, TOWN OF
NORTHGLENN, CITY OF
NORWOOD, TOWN OF
NUNN, TOWN OF
OAK CREEK, TOWN OF
OLATHE, TOWN OF
ORCHARD CITY, CITY OF
ORDWAY, TOWN OF
OTERO COUNTY *
OTIS, TOWN OF
OURAY COUNTY *
OURAY, CITY OF
PAGOSA SPRINGS, TOWN OF
PALISADE, CITY OF
PALMER LAKE, TOWN OF
PAONIA, TOWN OF
PARACHUTE, TOWN OF
FORMERLY THE TOWN OF GRAND VALLEY
PARK COUNTY*
PARKER, TOWN OF
PHILLIPS COUNTY *
PIERCE, TOWN OF
PITKIN COUNTY*
PLATTEVILLE, TOWN OF
PONCHA SPRINGS, TOWN OF
PROWERS COUNTY*
PUEBLO COUNTY *
PUEBLO, CITY OF
RAMAH, TOWN OF
RANGELY, TOWN OF
REDCLIFF, TOWN OF
RICO, TOWN OF
RIDGWAY, TOWN OF
RIFLE, CITY OF
RIO BLANCO COUNTY *
RIO GRANDE COUNTY *
ROCKVALE, TOWN OF
ROCKY FORD, CITY OF
ROUTT COUNTY *
SALIDA, CITY OF
SAN JUAN COUNTY *
SAN LUIS, TOWN OF
SAN MIGUEL COUNTY *
SEDGWICK, TOWN OF
SEVERANCE, TOWN OF
County
MONTROSE COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MONTROSE COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
ROUTT COUNTY
MONTROSE COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
CROWLEY COUNTY
OTERO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OURAY COUNTY
OURAY COUNTY
ARCHULETA COUNTY
MESA COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
PITKIN COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
CHAFFEE COUNTY
PROWERS COUNTY
PUEBLO COUNTY
PUEBLO COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
RIO BLANCO COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
DOLORES COUNTY
OURAY COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
RIO BLANCO COUNTY
RIO GRANDE
COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
OTERO COUNTY
ROUTT COUNTY
CHAFFEE COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
COSTILLA COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/01/84(R)
12/18/86(R)
09/29/89(R)
12/01/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
01/27/85(R)
02/01/79(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/16/82(R)
05/16/83(R)
12/18/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/01/78(R)
02/05/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
04/01/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/24/98
11/15/79(R)
06/04/87(R)
02/29/80(R)
02/19/87(R)
07/01/86(R)
09/29/89(R)
08/24/73(R)
08/05/86(R)
12/01/77(R)
04/18/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/18/77(R)
06/15/73(R)
02/16/90(R)
05/19/87(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/03/80(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/30/82(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/03/89(R)
03/28/95(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/17/86
08/23/99
09/29/89
12/01/82
01/06/82
05/06/96
03/31/81
(NSFHA)
02/01/79
07/17/89
09/16/82
07/16/81
12/18/85(M)
08/19/85
08/19/85(M)
07/03/85
07/03/85
05/02/91
07/15/92
08/23/99
03/16/83
09/27/91
04/01/87(L)
02/02/96
11/15/79
09/30/88
(NSFHA)
02/19/87
07/12/77
09/29/89
09/29/86
08/23/99
09/28/90
06/04/80
08/05/86(M)
09/27/85
01/03/86
02/16/90
05/19/87
10/15/85(M)
06/03/80(M)
09/29/89
09/30/82
09/01/78
09/01/87(L)
09/30/92
08/03/89
09/22/99
Page 4 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
080018#
080223A
080200#
080201#
080165#
080312#
0803 18#
080159#
080294#
080290#
080203#
080173#
080168#
080007#
080107#
080054#
080086B
080083#
080021
080266#
080104#
080008#
085079#
080204#
080228#
080264#
080305#
080175#
080191#
080160
080291#
080265
Community Name
USE THE WELD COUNTY [080266] FIRM, PANEL #0475
DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1982.
SHERIDAN, CITY OF
SILT, TOWN OF
SILVER PLUME, TOWN OF
SILVERTHORNE, TOWN OF
SILVERTON, TOWN OF
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, TOWN OF
SOUTH FORK, TOWN OF
USE THE RIO GRANDE COUNTY [080153] FIRM
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CITY OF
STERLING, CITY OF
SUMMIT COUNTY *
SUPERIOR, TOWN OF
TELLER COUNTY *
TELLURIDE, TOWN OF
THORNTON, CITY OF
TRINIDAD, CITY OF
VAIL, TOWN OF
WALDEN, TOWN OF
WALSENBURG, CITY OF
WALSH, TOWN OF
WELD COUNTY *
WELLINGTON, TOWN OF
WESTMINSTER, CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, CITY OF
WIGGINS, CITY OF
WILEY, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, CITY OF
WINTER PARK, TOWN OF
WOODLAND PARK, TOWN OF
WRAY, CITY OF
YAMPA, CITY OF
YUMA COUNTY *
YUMA, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CLEAR CREEK
COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
PITKIN COUNTY
RIO GRANDE
COUNTY
ROUTT COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
BOULDER COUNTY
TELLER COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LAS ANIMAS COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
HUERFANO COUNTY
BACA COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
LARIMER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
PROWERS COUNTY
WELD COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
TELLER COUNTY
YUMA COUNTY
ROUTT COUNTY
YUMA COUNTY
YUMA COUNTY
228
223
21
29
5
2
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/13/76(R)
04/01/87(R)
12/05/84(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/01/78(R)
06/04/87(R)
06/05/95(R)
01/19/78(R)
09/29/89(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/15/78(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/03/78(R)
05/02/83(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/29/86(R)
06/30/76(R)
03/18/80(R)
02/15/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/26/72(R)
02/15/79(R)
10/06/00(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/23/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/16/95
04/01/87(L)
06/06/01
05/01/80
09/01/78
09/30/88
04/19/83
09/29/89
12/16/80
05/06/96
09/30/88
09/30/92
08/16/95
04/03/84
05/01/85
08/05/86(M)
09/29/86
(NSFHA)
09/22/99
10/20/98
04/02/97
02/04/88
02/15/79
10/06/00
09/27/91
11/15/85
09/30/88
06/19/85
(NSFHA)
06/19/85
(NSFHA)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
Page 5 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 7 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
080229
080003#
080210
080040A
080120A
080238#
080056#
080247#
080074A
080108#
080033
080256
080127A
080170#
080293#
080150#
080164
080316#
080106A
Community Name
"COLORADO
AGUILAR, TOWN OF
BENNETT, TOWN OF
COAL CREEK, TOWN OF
CUSTER COUNTY*
DINOSAUR, TOWN OF
EAGLE, TOWN OF
ELIZABETH, TOWN OF
GLENDALE, TOWN OF
HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, TOWN OF
HUGO, TOWN OF
KIT CARSON, TOWN OF
NEW CASTLE, TOWN OF
NUCLA, TOWN OF
OVID, TOWN OF
PITKIN, TOWN OF
RYE, TOWN OF
SAGAUCHE, TOWN OF
SAWPIT, TOWN OF
STARKVILLE, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
LAS ANIMAS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
MOFFAT COUNTY
EAGLE COUNTY
ELBERT COUNTY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
MONTROSE COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
GUNNISON COUNTY
PUEBLO COUNTY
SAGUACHE COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
LAS ANIMAS COUNTY
0
2
0
Hazard Area
Identified
07/11/75
08/16/95(F)
08/15/75
06/07/77
08/30/74
03/18/80(F)
12/12/78(F)
04/17/89(F)
1 1/22/74
10/15/85(F)
12/13/74
07/25/75
05/24/74
11/15/74
06/20/78
07/18/75
05/28/76
09/30/88(F)
09/06/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/11/76
1 1/22/75
08/15/76
06/07/78
08/30/75
05/17/89(8)
09/06/75
04/17/90
1 1/22/75
10/15/85(8)
12/13/75
07/25/76
05/24/75
11/15/75
06/20/79
07/18/76
05/28/77
09/30/89
09/06/75
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 17
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 17
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
090161#
09007 1#
090165#
09002 1#
090043#
090134#
090072#
090022#
090144#
09000 1#
090178#
090122#
090109#
090094#
090073#
090002#
090184#
090023#
090003#
090164#
090145#
090044#
090183#
090135#
090179#
090074#
090060#
09006 1#
090095#
090180#
090160#
090045#
090110#
090123#
090004#
090169#
090005#
090062#
090075#
090185#
090025#
090063#
090064#
090026#
090076#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"CONNECTICUT
ANDOVER, TOWN OF
ANSONIA, CITY OF
ASHFORD, TOWN OF
AVON, TOWN OF
BANTAM, BOROUGH OF
BARKHAMSTED, TOWN OF
BEACON FALLS, TOWN OF
BERLIN, TOWN OF
BETHANY, TOWN OF
BETHEL, TOWN OF
BETHLEHEM, TOWN OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF
BOLTON, TOWN OF
BOZRAH, TOWN OF
BRANFORD, TOWN OF
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, CITY OF
BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
BROOKLYN, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
CANAAN, TOWN OF
CANTERBURY, TOWN OF
CANTON, TOWN OF
Includes the Town of Collinsville
CHAPLIN, TOWN OF
CHESHIRE, TOWN OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
COLCHESTER, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE BOROUGH OF COLCHESTER
COLEBROOK, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
CORNWALL, TOWN OF
COVENTRY, TOWN OF
CROMWELL, TOWN OF
DANBURY, CITY OF
DANIELSON, BOROUGH OF
DARIEN, TOWN OF
DEEP RIVER, TOWN OF
DERBY, CITY OF
DURHAM, TOWN OF
EAST GRANBY, TOWN OF
EAST HADDAM, TOWN OF
EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF
EAST HARTFORD, TOWN OF
EAST HAVEN, TOWN OF
in the National Flood Program
County
TOLLAND COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/03/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/01/81(R)
05/16/77(R)
10/15/81(R)
02/17/82(R)
03/01/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/23/77(R)
02/15/84(R)
06/04/90(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/01/81(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
12/15/77(R)
10/15/80(R)
11/01/79(R)
U/1 Q/Q 1 /"T?\
/ 1 o/ o 1 \K-J
06/15/79(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/01/81(R)
09/02/88(R)
10/16/84(R)
08/02/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/16/88(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/02/77(R)
11/01/84(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/15/77(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
10/16/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
02/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/03/82
05/18/92
12/01/81
06/17/86
10/15/81(M)
02/17/82
03/01/79
05/03/93
12/02/80
02/15/84
06/04/90
10/16/91
06/01/81
1 1/02/95
06/16/92
06/16/92
11/01/79
11/18/81
06/15/79
01/03/85
06/01/81
09/02/88
10/16/84
03/18/91
01/06/82
08/02/95
02/02/90
01/17/97
06/04/96
06/03/86(M)
09/16/82
08/16/88
06/11/82
09/17/97
04/16/82
11/01/84
09/02/93
01/16/81
07/16/91
04/01/82
02/05/97
11/01/80
10/16/79
10/23/81
11/19/97
Page 1 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
090096#
090027#
090115#
090006#
090158#
090028#
090065#
090007#
090029#
090187#
090154#
090124#
090177#
090125#
090008#
090173#
090167#
090126#
090097#
090077#
090066#
090078#
090170A
095080#
090146#
090147#
090162#
090098#
090186#
090136#
090174#
090155#
090157#
090172#
090047#
090127#
090079#
09003 1#
090128#
090148#
090081#
090080#
090067#
090068#
090082#
090009#
Community Name
EAST LYME, TOWN OF
EAST WINDSOR, TOWN OF
EASTFORD, TOWN OF
EASTON, TOWN OF
ELLINGTON, TOWN OF
ENFIELD, TOWN OF
ESSEX, TOWN OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON, TOWN OF
FENWICK, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
GLASTONBURY, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GRANBY, TOWN OF
GREENWICH, TOWN OF
GRISWOLD, TOWN OF
GROTON LONG POINT ASSOCIATION
GROTON, CITY OF
GROTON, TOWN OF
GUILFORD, TOWN OF
HADDAM, TOWN OF
HAMDEN, TOWN OF
HAMPTON, TOWN OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HARTLAND, TOWN OF
HARWINTON, TOWN OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
JEWETT CITY, BOROUGH OF
KENT, TOWN OF
KILLINGLY, TOWN OF
KILLINGWORTH, TOWN OF
LEBANON, TOWN OF
LEDYARD, TOWN OF
LISBON, TOWN OF
LITCHFIELD, TOWN OF
LYME, TOWN OF
MADISON, TOWN OF
MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
MANSFIELD, TOWN OF
MARLBOROUGH, TOWN OF
MERIDEN, CITY OF
MIDDLEBURY, TOWN OF
MIDDLEFIELD, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN, CITY OF
MILFORD, CITY OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
County
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/03/78(R)
05/16/83(R)
09/30/83(R)
03/15/82(R)
03/28/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/15/77(R)
07/10/79(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/15/78(R)
11/16/90(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/03/85(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
04/15/77(R)
05/01/78(R)
01/16/80(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/04/85(R)
04/28/72(R)
12/16/80(R)
02/17/82(R)
10/15/81(R)
04/03/85(R)
03/04/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/03/88(R)
04/01/81(R)
02/15/85(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
08/16/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
10/16/79(R)
03/28/80(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/30/99
04/03/78
05/16/83
09/30/83
02/05/97
03/28/80
03/04/86
10/06/98
01/05/96
01/18/84
12/01/81
06/15/78
11/16/90
03/03/97
02/22/99
01/03/85
08/02/95
08/02/95
08/02/95
08/19/86
01/16/80
06/15/79
12/04/85(M)
12/04/86
12/16/80
02/17/82
03/18/91
04/03/85
03/04/80
01/03/85(M)
09/30/92
06/03/91
04/01/81
02/15/85
01/02/92
01/03/79
08/02/95
01/19/94
01/02/81
09/03/92
11/20/00
10/16/79
03/28/80
03/07/01
09/07/99
03/04/91
Page 2 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
090099#
090176#
090137#
090032#
090010#
090188#
090048#
090084#
090100#
090049#
090033#
09001 1#
090129#
090181#
090085#
090149#
090086#
090101#
090012#
090102#
090103#
090069#
090087#
090150#
090116#
090034#
090138#
090163#
090130#
090139#
090151#
090194#
090141#
090013#
090142#
09005 1#
090156#
090052#
090182A
090088#
090053#
0900 14#
090166#
090035#
090112#
090036#
090089#
090037#
Community Name
MONTVILLE, TOWN OF
MORRIS, TOWN OF
NAUGATUCK, BOROUGH OF
NEW BRITAIN, CITY OF
NEW CANAAN, TOWN OF
NEW FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
NEW HARTFORD, TOWN OF
NEW HAVEN, CITY OF
NEW LONDON, CITY OF
NEW MILFORD,TOWN OF
NEWINGTON, TOWN OF
NEWTOWN, TOWN OF
NOANK FIRE DISTRICT
NORFOLK, TOWN OF
NORTH BRANFORD, TOWN OF
NORTH CANAAN, TOWN OF
NORTH HAVEN, TOWN OF
NORTH STONINGTON, TOWN OF
NORWALK, CITY OF
NORWICH, CITY OF
OLD LYME, TOWN OF
OLD SAYBROOK, TOWN OF
ORANGE, TOWN OF
OXFORD, TOWN OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
PLAINVILLE, TOWN OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
POMFRET, TOWN OF
PORTLAND, TOWN OF
PRESTON, TOWN OF
PROSPECT, TOWN OF
PUTNAM, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF PUTNAM
REDDING, TOWN OF
RIDGEFIELD, TOWN OF
ROCKY HILL, TOWN OF
ROXBURY, TOWN OF
SALEM, TOWN OF
SALISBURY, TOWN OF
SCOTLAND, TOWN OF
SEYMOUR, TOWN OF
SHARON, TOWN OF
SHELTON, CITY OF
SHERMAN,TOWN OF
SIMSBURY, TOWN OF
SOMERS, TOWN OF
SOUTH WINDSOR, TOWN OF
SOUTHBURY, TOWN OF
SOUTHINGTON, TOWN OF
County
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/80(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
08/15/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/16/77(R)
02/15/84(R)
02/03/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/02/77(R)
04/15/80(R)
10/16/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/03/87(R)
07/03/78(R)
11/18/88(R)
09/17/80(R)
04/03/85(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/03/78(R)
03/18/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/17/91(R)
11/19/80(R)
10/15/82(R)
04/17/85(R)
07/03/78(R)
03/04/85(R)
02/04/77(R)
10/18/88(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/03/87(R)
07/16/82(R)
01/05/89(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/18/87(R)
05/16/77(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/28/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/05/95
09/30/81
08/15/79
05/18/98
06/04/90
02/15/84
02/03/82
06/16/92
08/02/95
06/04/87
10/16/79
06/15/79
01/05/84
12/03/87
07/03/78
11/18/88
05/01/85
04/03/85
06/02/92
03/15/94
06/16/92
06/16/92
08/02/95
03/18/91
06/17/91
01/06/88
1 1/06/98
04/17/85
07/03/78
09/04/85
05/16/95
10/18/88
06/15/82
08/23/99
08/01/80
12/03/87
02/03/82
01/05/89
12/04/85(M)
04/16/91
08/16/88
09/07/00
06/18/87
04/15/86(M)
12/05/89
02/23/01
12/11/81
07/20/98
Page 3 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
090105#
090152#
090015#
090118#
090193#
090106#
090016#
090038#
090055#
090117#
090171#
095081#
0900 17#
090190B
090131#
090143#
090090#
090175#
090057#
09009 1#
090107#
090058#
095082#
090092#
090070#
090018#
090019#
090040#
090159#
090020#
090132#
090119#
090042#
09004 1#
090093#
090153#
090133#
090120#
Community Name
SPRAQUE, TOWN OF
STAFFORD, TOWN OF
STAMFORD, CITY OF
STERLING, TOWN OF
STONINGTON, BOROUGH OF
STONINGTON, TOWN OF
STRATFORD, TOWN OF
SUFFIELD, TOWN OF
THOMASTON, TOWN OF
THOMPSON, TOWN OF
TOLLAND, TOWN OF
TORRINGTON, CITY OF
TRUMBULL, TOWN OF
UNION, TOWN OF
VERNON, TOWN OF
VOLUNTOWN, TOWN OF
WALLINGFORD, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WATERBURY, CITY OF
WATERFORD, TOWN OF
WATERTOWN, TOWN OF
WEST HARTFORD,TOWN OF
WEST HAVEN, CITY OF
WESTBROOK, CITY OF
WESTON, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
WETHERSFIELD, TOWN OF
WILLINGTON, TOWN OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
WINCHESTER, TOWN OF
WINDHAM, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF WILLIMANTIC
WINDSOR LOCKS, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WOLCOTT, TOWN OF
WOODBRIDGE, TOWN OF
WOODBURY, TOWN OF
WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW LONDON
COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
TOLLAND COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
HARTFORD COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
NEW HAVEN COUNTY
LITCHFIELD COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
177
177
0
7
0
0
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/03/85(R)
06/01/82(R)
01/16/81(R)
03/04/85(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/15/79(R)
07/05/82(R)
11/01/84(R)
04/01/82(R)
05/19/72(R)
12/04/79(R)
12/04/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/03/88(R)
09/15/78(R)
01/03/90(R)
06/03/88(R)
11/01/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/24/7 1(R)
01/17/79(R)
12/01/82(R)
10/17/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/02/77(R)
06/15/82(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/17/78(R)
02/03/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/05/78(R)
11/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/03/85
06/01/82
11/17/93
03/04/85
08/02/95
09/06/95
06/16/92
08/15/79
07/05/82
11/01/84
04/01/82
04/04/83
12/19/97
12/04/85(M)
08/09/99
06/03/88
09/07/00
01/03/90
09/30/92
11/01/79
09/06/95
1 1/05/80
08/19/91
06/16/92
06/16/92
12/19/97
06/30/99
02/19/82
06/15/82
02/18/98
07/17/78
1 1/06/98
01/03/79
09/29/86
07/05/82
03/18/91
10/20/78
11/01/84
Page 4 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 5 of 6 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 6 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
100058#
105083#
100055#
10003 1#
100002#
100003#
100004B
100005#
100033#
100022#
100056#
100006#
100023#
105084#
100037#
100009#
100039#
100010#
100053#
100001#
100040#
100014#
100041#
100015#
100024#
100042#
100043#
100044#
100045#
105085#
100026#
100025#
100054#
100046#
105086#
100048#
100038#
100050#
100017#
100051#
100029#
Communities
Community Name
"DELAWARE
ARDENTOWN, VILLAGE OF
BETHANY BEACH, TOWN OF
BETHEL, TOWN OF
BLADES, TOWN OF
BOWERS, TOWN OF
CAMDEN, TOWN OF
CHESWOLD, TOWN OF
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
DAGSBORO, TOWN OF
DELAWARE CITY, CITY OF
DEWEY BEACH, TOWN OF
DOVER, CITY OF
ELSMERE, TOWN OF
FENWICK ISLAND, TOWN OF
FRANKFORD, TOWN OF
FREDERICA, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD, TOWN OF
HARRINGTON, CITY OF
HENLOPEN ACRES, TOWN OF
KENT COUNTY *
LAUREL, TOWN OF
LEIPSIC, TOWN OF
LEWES, CITY OF
LITTLE CREEK, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
MILFORD, CITY OF
MILLSBORO, TOWN OF
MILLVILLE, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
NEW CASTLE COUNTY *
NEW CASTLE, CITY OF
NEW ARK, CITY OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
OCEAN VIEW, TOWN OF
REHOBOTH BEACH, CITY OF
SEAFORD, CITY OF
SELBYVILLE, TOWN OF
SLAUGHTER BEACH, TOWN OF
SMYRNA, TOWN OF
SOUTH BETHANY, TOWN OF
SUSSEX COUNTY*
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/28/97(R)
04/06/73(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
01/07/77(R)
06/01/77(R)
06/01/81(R)
02/16/77(R)
06/18/82(R)
09/16/82(R)
12/31/76(R)
03/23/73(R)
09/16/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
02/24/78(R)
06/01/77(R)
08/15/78(R)
03/15/78(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/15/77(R)
01/17/79(R)
01/07/77(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/25/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
1 2/03/7 1(R)
12/26/75(R)
03/29/74(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/03/80(R)
03/30/73(R)
02/01/79(R)
07/16/91(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/01/77(R)
10/06/76(R)
10/06/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/06/00
02/08/99
02/08/99
02/08/99
09/02/82
09/16/81
01/07/77(M)
06/01/77
02/08/99
10/06/00
02/08/99
09/16/82
10/06/00
02/08/99
02/08/99
01/02/81
02/08/99
06/01/77
02/08/99
04/02/92
02/08/99
09/29/78
12/20/00
08/03/92
10/06/00
02/08/99
02/08/99
02/08/99
02/08/99
10/06/00
10/06/00
10/06/00
10/06/00
02/08/99
12/20/00
02/08/99
02/08/99
02/08/99
01/15/82
02/08/99
12/20/00
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
100028# WILMINGTON, CITY OF
100020# WYOMING, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
NEW CASTLE
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
43
43
0
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
05/02/77(R) 10/06/00
03/16/81(R)
03/16/81
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 2 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"DELAWARE
100032# BRIDGEVILLE, TOWN OF
100008B FELTON, TOWN OF
100062# GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
SUSSEX COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
0
2
0
Hazard Area
Identified
01/07/77(F)
01/07/77(F)
06/16/95(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
11/18/88(8)
11/18/88(8)
06/16/96
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID
Community Name
"DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
110001# DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
WASH D.C.
1
1
0
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
11/15/85(R)
11/15/85
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120001#
120664#
120290#
125087#
120089#
120180#
120073#
120670#
120581#
120075#
120193#
120262#
120676#
120419#
120636#
120076
120263#
120004#
120637#
120194#
120181#
125089#
120239#
125090#
125088#
120383
120569#
120638#
120060#
120195#
120116#
120104#
120196#
125091#
120155#
120015#
120301#
125092#
120197#
120582#
120016#
120333#
Communities Participating in
Community Name
"FLORIDA
ALACHUA COUNTY*
ALACHUA, CITY OF
USE THE ALACHUA COUNTY [120001] FIRM
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, CITY OF
ANNA MARIA, CITY OF
APALACHICOLA, CITY OF
APOPKA, CITY OF
ARCADIA, CITY OF
ARCHER, CITY OF
ASTATULA, TOWN OF
ATLANTIC BEACH, CITY OF
ATLANTIS, CITY OF
AUBURNDALE, CITY OF
AVENTURA, CITY OF
THE CITY OF AVENTURA HAS ADOPTED THE DADE
COUNTY (120635) FIRM DATED 3-2-94 PANELS 82 AND
84
BAKER COUNTY *
BAL HARBOUR, VILLAGE OF
BALDWIN, TOWN OF
BARTOW, CITY OF
BAY COUNTY*
BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, TOWN OF
BELLE GLADE, CITY OF
BELLE ISLE, CITY OF
BELLEAIR BEACH, CITY OF
BELLEAIR BLUFFS, CITY OF
BELLEAIR SHORE, TOWN OF
BELLEAIR, TOWN OF
BELLEVIEW, CITY OF
BEVERLY BEACH, TOWN OF
BISCAYNE PARK, VILLAGE OF
BLOUNTSTOWN,CITY OF
BOCA RATON, CITY OF
BONIFAY, CITY OF
BOWLING GREEN, CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, CITY OF
BRADENTON BEACH, CITY OF
BRADENTON, CITY OF
BRADFORD COUNTY *
BRANFORD, TOWN OF
BREVARD COUNTY *
BRINY BREEZES, TOWN OF
BRONSON, TOWN OF
BROOKER, TOWN OF
BROOKSVILLE, CITY OF
the National Flood Program
County
ALACHUA COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
FLAGLER COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
HARDEE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
SUWANNEE COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
HERNANDO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/28/84(R)
02/21/94(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/11/71(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/03/88(R)
06/09/94(R)
03/04/98(R)
03/15/77(R)
11/01/78(R)
05/11/79(R)
10/22/97(R)
07/16/91(R)
09/29/72(R)
06/30/76(R)
12/16/80(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/29/72(R)
05/15/78(R)
09/15/78(R)
05/14/71(R)
08/15/77(R)
05/15/71(R)
05/14/71(R)
06/18/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/29/72(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/04/88(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/11/71(R)
06/01/81(R)
11/15/89(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/22/72(R)
05/15/78(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/16/90(R)
06/01/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/04/88
02/02/96
04/17/95
02/18/84
07/18/83
12/06/00
06/03/88
08/02/95
08/15/84
04/17/89
11/01/78
12/20/00
07/16/91
07/17/95
(NSFHA)
12/20/00
09/20/96
07/17/95
09/30/82
12/06/00
03/02/83
01/19/83
03/02/83
01/19/83
(NSFHA)
01/03/86
07/17/95
12/06/00
09/19/84
12/05/90
05/04/88
09/30/82
05/18/92
11/16/83
11/15/89
01/16/87
11/19/97
09/30/82
02/01/87(L)
11/15/89
09/18/86
Page lof 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
125093#
120086#
120297A
120403
120171#
120005#
120619#
125094#
125095#
120090#
120321#
120291#
120006B
120373#
120615#
120084#
120061#
120092#
120325#
120596#
120063#
120064#
125096#
120133#
120108B
120198#
125097#
120020#
12003 1#
120616
120067#
120070#
120032#
120639#
120033#
120583#
120408#
120597#
120074#
120340#
12023 1#
120635#
120034#
120410#
120035#
125100#
125099#
120672#
125101#
120318
Community Name
BROWARD COUNTY*
BUNNELL, CITY OF
BUSHNELL, CITY OF
CALHOUN COUNTY*
CALLAHAN, TOWN OF
CALLAWAY, CITY OF
CAPE CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY
CAPE CANAVERAL, CITY OF
CAPE CORAL, CITY OF
CARRABELLE, CITY OF
CARYVILLE, TOWN OF
CASSELBERRY, CITY OF
CEDAR GROVE, TOWN OF
CEDAR KEY, CITY OF
CENTER HILL, CITY OF
CENTURY, CITY OF
FORMERLY THE CITY OF SOUTH FLOMATON
CHARLOTTE COUNTY *
CHATTAHOOCHEE, CITY OF
CHIPLEY,CITY OF
CINCO BAYOU, TOWN OF
CITRUS COUNTY *
CLAY COUNTY *
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
CLERMONT, CITY OF
CLEWISTON, CITY OF
CLOUD LAKE, TOWN OF
COCOA BEACH, CITY OF
COCOA, CITY OF
COCONUT CREEK, CITY OF
COLEMAN, CITY OF
COLLIER COUNTY *
COLUMBIA COUNTY*
COOPER CITY, CITY OF
CORAL GABLES, CITY OF
CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF
COTTONDALE, CITY OF
CRESCENT CITY, CITY OF
CRESTVIEW, CITY OF
USE THE OKALOOSA COUNTY [120173] FIRM.
CROSS CITY, TOWN OF
CRYSTAL RIVER, CITY OF
DADE CITY, CITY OF
DADE COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS ONLY
DANIA BEACH, CITY OF
DAVENPORT, TOWN OF
DAVIE, CITY OF
DAYTONA BEACH SHORES, CITY OF
DAYTONA BEACH, CITY OF
DEBARY, CITY OF
DEERFIELD BEACH, CITY OF
DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, CITY OF
County
BROWARD COUNTY
FLAGLER COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
GADSDEN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
CITRUS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HENDRY COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
DIXIE COUNTY
CITRUS COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/20/72(R)
01/03/86(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/18/87(R)
04/04/83(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/03/89(R)
09/29/72(R)
08/17/81(R)
07/18/83(R)
02/04/88(R)
07/02/80(R)
01/25/80(R)
03/01/84(R)
01/18/89(R)
08/04/87(R)
08/06/71(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/04/7 1(R)
08/15/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/16/72(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/14/79(R)
01/06/88(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/29/72(R)
01/17/78(R)
12/30/93(R)
12/18/79(R)
02/03/93(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/15/84(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/29/72(R)
02/15/78(R)
12/02/80(R)
07/13/76(R)
09/07/73(R)
09/07/73(R)
ll/23/73(R)
11/10/72(R)
12/21/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/02/97
01/03/86
06/25/76(M)
12/06/00
04/04/83
04/30/86
01/05/96
01/05/96
09/18/85
07/18/83
06/17/91
04/17/95
01/25/80(M)
06/30/99
01/18/89
02/23/00
06/16/93
09/04/87
06/17/91
07/03/85
1 1/06/98
1 1/04/92
08/18/92
08/15/84
03/15/77
05/15/78
01/05/96
01/05/96
07/21/95
(NSFHA)
07/20/98
01/06/88
07/21/95
07/17/95
07/21/95
12/15/90
12/18/79
04/04/94
09/16/82
08/15/84
08/17/81
07/17/95
07/21/95
12/20/00
07/21/95
09/16/82
06/04/90
02/02/96
10/02/97
03/07/00
Page 2 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120307#
125102#
120677#
120072#
125158#
120336#
120409#
125103#
120574#
120182#
120629#
120308#
120183#
120640#
120080#
120630#
120134#
125104#
120146#
120120#
120172#
120087#
120085#
120641#
125105#
120264#
120673
125106#
120286#
120174#
120088#
120319
120265#
120387#
120091#
125107#
120094#
120095#
120200#
120642#
120201
120127#
120128#
120065#
120203
Community Name
DELANO, CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, CITY OF
DELTONA, CITY OF
THE CITY OF DELTONA HAS ADOPTED THE VOLUSIA
COUNTY (125155) FIRM DATED 2-2-96.
DESOTO COUNTY*
DESTIN, CITY OF
DIXIE COUNTY *
DUNDEE, TOWN OF
DUNEDIN, CITY OF
DUNNELLON, CITY OF
EATONVILLE, TOWN OF
EBRD, TOWN OF
EDGEWATER, CITY OF
EDGEWOOD, CITY OF
EL PORTAL, VILLAGE OF
ESCAMBIA COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF NAVARRE BEACH
ESTO, TOWN OF
EUSTIS, CITY OF
EVERGLADES CITY, CITY OF
FANNING SPRINGS, TOWN OF
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FERNANDINA BEACH, CITY OF
FLAGLER BEACH, CITY OF
FLAGLER COUNTY*
FLORIDA CITY, CITY OF
FORT LAUDERDALE, CITY OF
FORT MEADE, CITY OF
FORT MYERS BEACH, TOWN OF
USE THE LEE COUNTY [125124] FIRM
FORT MYERS, CITY OF
FORT PIERCE, CITY OF
FORT WALTON BEACH, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FREEPORT, CITY OF
FROSTPROOF, CITY OF
FRUITLAND PARK, CITY OF
GADSDEN COUNTY *
GAINESVILLE, CITY OF
GILCHRIST COUNTY *
GLADES COUNTY *
GLEN RIDGE, TOWN OF
GOLDEN BEACH, TOWN OF
GOLF, VILLAGE OF
GRACEVILLE, CITY OF
GRAND RIDGE, TOWN OF
GREEN COVE SPRINGS, CITY OF
GREENACRES, CITY OF
County
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
DIXIE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY
GILCHRIST COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
FLAGLER COUNTY
FLAGLER COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
GADSDEN COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
GILCHRIST COUNTY
GLADES COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/22/80(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
01/22/98(R)
06/03/88(R)
07/06/88(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
11/19/80(R)
05/14/71(R)
02/01/85(R)
12/01/78(R)
03/19/96(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/30/77(R)
03/19/96(R)
06/04/87(R)
10/06/72(R)
09/05/84(R)
10/18/93(R)
01/14/77(R)
05/15/85(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/29/72(R)
11/03/72(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/19/84(R)
04/16/79(R)
12/01/77(R)
04/01/77(R)
07/18/83(R)
12/14/92(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/05/84(R)
05/02/91(R)
10/01/71(R)
08/16/88(R)
05/17/82(R)
05/15/78(R)
09/29/72(R)
08/26/77(R)
12/15/90(R)
05/01/87(R)
03/01/79(R)
08/26/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/95
01/05/89
06/03/88
06/30/99
1 1/02/83
12/20/00
07/02/92
02/01/85
12/06/00
06/17/91
06/04/90
12/06/00
07/17/95
02/23/00
12/05/90
06/04/87
06/03/86
08/16/88
05/03/93
05/18/92
05/15/85
07/15/92
07/17/95
10/02/97
12/20/00
11/15/84
1 1/04/92
07/03/85
07/20/98
03/07/00
12/20/00
09/05/84
05/02/91
02/17/93
08/16/88
05/17/82
05/15/78
07/17/95
(NSFHA)
12/15/90
12/15/90
04/06/00
(NSFHA)
Page 3 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120150A
120135#
120275#
120098#
125109#
125108#
120266#
125110#
120101#
120627#
120103#
120282#
120411 A
120205
120107#
120110#
120644#
120643#
120669#
125111#
120111#
120573#
120040#
120112#
125112C
125113#
125114#
120420#
120645#
120326#
120585#
120207#
125115#
120646#
125116#
120119#
120121#
125117#
125118#
120586#
120391#
120348#
120424#
Community Name
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GROVELAND, CITY OF
GULF BREEZE, CITY OF
GULF COUNTY *
GULF STREAM, TOWN OF
GULFPORT, CITY OF
HAINES CITY, CITY OF
HALLANDALE BEACH, CITY OF
HAMILTON COUNTY*
HAMPTON, CITY OF
HARDEE COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF ONA
HASTINGS, TOWN OF
HAVANA, TOWN OF
HAVERHILL, TOWN OF
HENDRY COUNTY *
HERNANDO COUNTY *
HIALEAH GARDENS, CITY OF
HIALEAH, CITY OF
HIGH SPRINGS, CITY OF
USE THE ALACHUA COUNTY [120001] FIRM
HIGHLAND BEACH, TOWN OF
HIGHLANDS COUNTY *
HILLIARD, TOWN OF
HILLSBORO BEACH, TOWN OF
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY*
HOLLY HILL, CITY OF
HOLLYWOOD, CITY OF
HOLMES BEACH, CITY OF
HOLMES COUNTY *
HOMESTEAD, CITY OF
HORSESHOE BEACH, TOWN OF
HOWEY IN THE HILLS, TOWN OF
HYPOLUXO, TOWN OF
INDIALANTIC, TOWN OF
INDIAN CREEK, VILLAGE OF
INDIAN HARBOR BEACH, CITY OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY *
INDIAN RIVER SHORES, TOWN OF
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, CITY OF
INDIAN SHORES, TOWN OF
INGLIS, TOWN OF
INTERLACHEN, TOWN OF
INVERNESS, CITY OF
ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE OF
FORMERLY PART OF MONROE CO. WITH AN INTIAL
FIRM DATE OF 6/20/70. USE MONROE COUNTY FIRM
PANELS 12087, -993, 0994, 1114, 1117, 1118, 1127,
1129, 1131, 1132, and 1137.
County
MADISON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SANTA ROSA
COUNTY
GULF COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
HARDEE COUNTY
ST. JOHNS COUNTY
GADSDEN COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
HERNANDO COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
HIGHLANDS COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DIXIE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
CITRUS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/87(R)
09/05/84(R)
09/01/77(R)
06/15/83(R)
1 l/24/72(R)
05/21/71(R)
09/16/81(R)
ll/24/72(R)
06/04/87(R)
01/15/99(R)
05/04/88(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/26/77(R)
05/17/82(R)
04/17/84(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
03/24/94(R)
10/16/70(R)
02/16/83(R)
03/16/98
04/17/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/07/73(R)
1 1/03/72(R)
06/11/71(R)
12/05/90(R)
09/29/72(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
08/15/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
08/18/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
06/16/72(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
05/07/71(R)
05/21/71(R)
01/10/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/17/82(R)
10/01/98(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/87(L)
09/05/84
01/19/00
06/02/92
09/30/82
11/01/84
12/20/00
07/21/95
06/04/87
11/15/89
05/04/88
07/16/87
06/17/86(M)
(NSFHA)
05/17/82
04/17/84
07/17/95
07/17/95
11/20/96
09/30/82
02/16/83
12/23/77
10/02/97
06/30/99
04/22/77
07/21/95
02/01/84
12/05/90
07/17/95
1 1/02/83
08/15/84
05/15/78
01/05/96
07/17/95
08/18/92
06/30/99
05/03/93
03/02/83
03/02/83
03/01/84
12/04/79
05/17/82
12/22/98
Page 4 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120647#
120125#
120078#
120077#
120339A
120331#
120208#
125120#
120162#
125119#
120245#
120648#
125121#
120168#
120671#
120190#
120109#
120613#
120131#
120595B
120406#
12021 1#
120421#
120414#
120416#
120212#
120390#
120213#
120267#
120214#
125122#
125123#
120043#
120044#
120628#
120169#
120045#
125124#
120151B
120136#
120143#
120145#
120148#
125125#
120334A
125126#
120292#
120009#
120590#
Community Name
ISLANDIA, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSONVILLE BEACH, CITY OF
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JAY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JUNO BEACH, TOWN OF
JUPITER INLET COLONY, TOWN OF
JUPITER ISLAND, TOWN OF
JUPITER, TOWN OF
KENNETH CITY, TOWN OF
KEY BISCAYNE, VILLAGE OF
KEY COLONY BEACH, CITY OF
KEY WEST, CITY OF
KEYSTONE HEIGHTS, CITY OF
KISSIMMEE, CITY OF
LA BELLE, CITY OF
LADY LAKE, TOWN OF
LAFAYETTE COUNTY*
LAKE BUTLER, CITY OF
LAKE CITY, CITY OF
LAKE CLARKE SHORES, TOWN OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE HAMILTON, TOWN OF
LAKE MARY, CITY OF
LAKE PARK, TOWN OF
LAKE WALES, CITY OF
LAKE WORTH, CITY OF
LAKELAND, CITY OF
LANTANA, TOWN OF
LARGO, CITY OF
LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, CITY OF
LAUDERDALE LAKES, CITY OF
LAUDERHILL, CITY OF
LAWTEY, CITY OF
LAYTON, CITY OF
LAZY LAKE, VILLAGE OF
LEE COUNTY*
LEE, TOWN OF
LEESBURG, CITY OF
LEON COUNTY *
LEVY COUNTY *
LIBERTY COUNTY *
LIGHTHOUSE POINT, CITY OF
LIVE OAK, CITY OF
LONGBOAT KEY, TOWN OF
LONG WOOD, CITY OF
LYNN HAVEN, CITY OF
MACCLENNY,CITY OF
County
DADE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
SANTA ROSA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
SUWANNEE COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/72(R)
12/15/90(R)
03/15/77(R)
12/01/77(R)
05/15/86(R)
07/16/91(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/22/72(R)
02/02/77(R)
09/22/72(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/29/72(R)
07/16/71(R)
09/03/7 1(R)
11/13/98(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/20/82(R)
11/14/84(R)
01/16/87(R)
07/03/86(R)
01/06/88(R)
11/01/78(R)
04/01/82(R)
11/05/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/15/78(R)
03/16/88(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/16/81(R)
03/12/71(R)
05/28/71(R)
10/27/72(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/15/78(R)
03/19/98(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
08/18/92(R)
09/19/84(R)
04/30/86(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/15/82(R)
03/01/84(R)
07/16/91(R)
11/03/72(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/30/7 1(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/01/77(R)
02/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/17/95
12/15/90
04/17/89
06/16/99
05/15/86(M)
07/16/91
09/30/82
09/30/82
09/20/96
06/02/92
09/01/83
07/17/95
12/22/98
12/22/98
06/22/98
05/07/01
03/18/87
08/15/84
01/16/87
07/03/86(M)
01/06/88
11/01/78
04/01/82
12/20/00
05/17/95
09/15/78
12/20/00
09/30/82
12/20/00
10/15/82
03/16/83
07/21/95
07/21/95
07/21/95
11/15/89(M)
12/22/98
07/21/95
12/20/00
04/30/86(M)
04/21/99
11/19/97
06/02/92
07/16/91
10/02/97
07/01/87(L)
05/18/92
04/17/95
04/30/86
02/01/87(L)
Page 5 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
125127#
120149#
120152B
120184#
120024#
120623#
120215#
120153#
120216#
120681#
120426
120047#
120129#
120570#
120160#
120161#
120337#
120591#
120132A
120649#
125128#
120329#
120025#
120010#
120651#
120652#
120653#
120650#
120344
120276#
120412#
120048#
125129#
120365A
120614#
120097#
120137#
120268#
125130#
120170#
120079#
120232#
125132#
120679#
Community Name
MADEIRA BEACH, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY*
MADISON, CITY OF
MAITLAND, CITY OF
MALABAR, TOWN OF
MALONE, TOWN OF
MANALAPAN, TOWN OF
MANATEE COUNTY *
MANGONIA PARK, TOWN OF
MARATHON, CITY OF
FORMERLY PART OF MONROE CO. WITH AN INTIAL
FIRM DATE OF 6/20/70. USE MONROE COUNTY FIRM
PANELS 12087C, - 1578H, 1579H, 1581G, 1582H and
1288H, 1601H, 1289H, 1291H, 1293H
MARCO ISLAND, CITY OF
USE THE COLLIER COUNTY (120067) FIRM DATED
7-20-98.
MARGATE, CITY OF
MARIANNA, CITY OF
MARINELAND, TOWN OF
MARION COUNTY *
MARTIN COUNTY *
MARY ESTHER, CITY OF
MASCOTTE, CITY OF
MAYO, TOWN OF
MEDLEY, TOWN OF
MELBOURNE BEACH, TOWN OF
MELBOURNE VILLAGE, TOWN OF
MELBOURNE, CITY OF
MEXICO BEACH, CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF
MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
MIAMI SPRINGS, CITY OF
MIAMI, CITY OF
MICANOPY, TOWN OF
MILTON, CITY OF
MINNEOLA, CITY OF
MIRAMAR, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY*
THE VILLAGE OF ISLAMORADA IS INCLUDED IN THE
MONROE COUNTY CORPORATE
LIMITS UNTIL OCTOBER 1, 1998.
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MONTVERDE, TOWN OF
MOORE HAVEN, CITY OF
MT. DORA, CITY OF
MULBERRY, CITY OF
NAPLES, CITY OF
NASSAU COUNTY*
NEPTUNE BEACH, CITY OF
NEW PORT RICHEY, CITY OF
NEW SMYRNA BEACH, CITY OF
NEWBERRY, CITY OF
County
PINELLAS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
FLAGLER COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
SANTA ROSA
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
GLADES COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
ALACHUA
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/07/71(R)
06/04/87(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/15/90(R)
10/30/70(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
10/16/00(R)
10/27/98(R)
01/19/78(R)
05/01/87(R)
02/19/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/18/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
09/29/72(R)
ll/24/72(R)
11/15/79(R)
07/01/79(R)
07/18/77(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
04/27/94
06/01/77(R)
08/15/84(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/15/73(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/11/91(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/05/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
07/02/7 1(R)
08/15/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
08/17/81(R)
12/07/73(R)
02/03/00(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/02/83
06/04/87
05/15/86(M)
12/06/00
01/05/96
12/15/90
09/30/82
06/30/99
03/01/78
12/20/00
10/02/97
12/15/90
02/19/86
01/19/83
06/30/99
07/03/85
11/15/84
05/01/87(L)
07/17/95
01/05/96
01/05/96
11/19/97
01/03/86
07/17/95
07/17/95
07/17/95
07/17/95
04/16/76
07/18/85
08/15/84
07/21/95
12/20/00
06/03/86(M)
11/15/84
02/04/81
04/05/88
12/20/00
1 1/04/92
05/18/92
04/17/89
07/05/83
06/16/92
Page 6 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120338#
12063 1#
120654#
120049#
120656#
120655#
120217#
120279#
125133#
120624#
120050#
120330#
120163#
125134#
120185#
120173#
120177#
120178
120250#
120657#
120633#
120179#
120066#
120122#
120186#
125136#
120189#
120293#
120219#
120273#
120404#
120192#
120221#
125137#
120220#
120612#
120223#
120159#
120013#
120012#
12001 1#
120051#
120230#
120052#
Community Name
Newberry will use the Alachua County FIRM panel numbers
120001 0225 A, 0250A, 0375A, 0400A
NICEVILLE, CITY OF
NOMA, TOWN OF
NORTH BAY VILLAGE, CITY OF
NORTH LAUDERDALE, CITY OF
NORTH MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF
NORTH MIAMI, CITY OF
NORTH PALM BEACH, VILLAGE OF
NORTH PORT, CITY OF
NORTH REDINGTON BEACH, TOWN OF
OAK HILL, CITY OF
OAKLAND PARK, CITY OF
OCALA, CITY OF
OCEAN BREEZE PARK, TOWN OF
OCEAN RIDGE, TOWN OF
OCOEE, CITY OF
OKALOOSA COUNTY *
OKEECHOBEE COUNTY *
OKEECHOBEE, CITY OF
OLDSMAR, CITY OF
OPA-LOCKA, CITY OF
ORANGE CITY, CITY OF
ORANGE COUNTY *
ORANGE PARK, CITY OF
ORCHID, TOWN OF
ORLANDO, CITY OF
ORMOND BEACH, CITY OF
OSCEOLA COUNTY *
OVIEDO, CITY OF
PAHOKEE, CITY OF
PALATKA, CITY OF
PALM BAY, CITY OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY *
PALM BEACH GARDENS, CITY OF
PALM BEACH SHORES, TOWN OF
PALM BEACH, TOWN OF
PALM SHORES, TOWN OF
PALM SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
PALMETTO, CITY OF
PANAMA CITY BEACH, CITY OF
PANAMA CITY, CITY OF
PARKER, CITY OF
PARKLAND, CITY OF
PASCO COUNTY *
PEMBROKE PARK, TOWN OF
County
OKALOOSA COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
SARASOTA COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
OKEECHOBEE
COUNTY
OKEECHOBEE
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
MANATEE COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/18/85(R)
03/19/96(R)
09/29/72(R)
04/02/79(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/29/72(R)
08/15/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/14/71(R)
02/21/94(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/22/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
11/01/78(R)
07/01/77(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/26/77(R)
05/21/71(R)
09/29/72(R)
09/02/94(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/07/73(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/01/79(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
05/15/78(R)
03/27/95(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/01/77(R)
07/18/77(R)
08/01/80(R)
04/02/79(R)
11/18/81(R)
05/01/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/18/85
12/05/90
07/17/95
08/18/92
07/17/95
07/17/95
06/02/92
09/02/81
03/03/83
07/15/92
10/02/97
09/22/78(M)
12/15/83
09/30/82
12/06/00
06/30/99
02/04/81
(NSFHA)
06/01/83
07/17/95
09/02/94
12/06/00
03/18/80
05/03/93
12/06/00
06/04/90
05/07/01
04/17/95
10/15/82
06/04/80
01/05/96
06/02/92
01/06/88
09/30/82
09/30/82
11/19/97
12/22/98
11/16/83
01/03/86
01/03/86
04/30/86
07/21/95
06/30/99
07/21/95
Page 7 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120053#
125138#
120082#
120303#
120425#
125139#
120251#
120113#
120054#
120261#
120418#
120055#
120117#
120312#
120313#
120234#
120099#
120287#
120062#
120272#
120093A
125140#
125141#
125142#
120027#
120225
125143#
120634
120294#
120402#
120274#
125144#
125150#
120028#
120056#
120123#
120289#
120257#
120164#
120579#
120130#
120620#
120226
120314#
120658#
Community Name
PEMBROKE PINES, CITY OF
PENSACOLA BEACH-SANTA ROSA ISLAND
AUTHORITY
PENSACOLA, CITY OF
PERRY, CITY OF
PINECREST, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF PINECREST HAS ADOPTED THE
DADE COUNTY (120635) FIRM
DATED 7-17-95.
PINELLAS COUNTY *
PINELLAS PARK, CITY OF
PLANT CITY, CITY OF
PLANTATION, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY*
POMONA PARK, TOWN OF
POMPANO BEACH, CITY OF
PONCE DE LEON, TOWN OF
PONCE INLET, TOWN OF
PORT ORANGE, CITY OF
PORT RICHEY, CITY OF
PORT ST JOE, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF WARD RIDGE
PORT ST. LUCIE, CITY OF
PUNTA GORDA, CITY OF
PUTNAM COUNTY *
QUINCY,CITY OF
REDINGTON BEACH, TOWN OF
REDINGTON SHORES, TOWN OF
RIVIERA BEACH, CITY OF
ROCKLEDGE, CITY OF
ROYAL PALM BEACH, VILLAGE OF
SAFETY HARBOR, CITY OF
SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF
SANFORD, CITY OF
SANIBEL, CITY OF
SANTA ROSA COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF NAVARRE BEACH
SARASOTA COUNTY *
SARASOTA, CITY OF
SATELLITE BEACH, CITY OF
SEA RANCH LAKES, VILLAGE OF
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY*
SEMINOLE, CITY OF
SEW ALLS POINT, TOWN OF
SHALIMAR, TOWN OF
SNEADS,TOWN OF
SOPCHOPPY, CITY OF
SOUTH BAY, CITY OF
SOUTH DAYTONA, CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI, CITY OF
County
BROWARD COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
GULF COUNTY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
GADSDEN COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
SANTA ROSA
COUNTY
SARASOTA COUNTY
SARASOTA COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WAKULLA COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/15/77(R)
09/28/73(R)
09/15/77(R)
05/17/82(R)
10/13/98(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
08/15/77(R)
04/29/83(R)
09/15/77(R)
01/19/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
12/05/90(R)
10/08/76(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/17/81(R)
06/15/83(R)
03/15/82(R)
10/30/70(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/01/87(R)
05/07/71(R)
05/07/71(R)
09/22/72(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/26/77(R)
05/14/71(R)
10/10/91
09/17/80(R)
04/16/79(R)
10/14/77(R)
07/30/7 1(R)
07/30/7 1(R)
02/13/76(R)
02/16/77(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/15/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/15/84(R)
08/26/77(R)
10/03/76(R)
09/29/72(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/21/95
02/23/00
02/23/00
05/17/82
05/06/96
02/17/89
04/29/83(M)
07/21/95
12/20/00
12/04/79
10/02/97
12/05/90
06/16/92
06/04/90
07/05/83
06/02/92
1 1/04/92
09/30/83
08/16/94
02/01/87(L)
03/02/83
03/02/83
09/30/82
01/05/96
(NSFHA)
06/01/83
04/17/95
09/29/96
01/19/00
09/03/92
09/29/96
01/05/96
10/02/97
06/30/99
04/17/95
01/18/84
10/16/96
07/03/85
12/15/90
08/15/84
(NSFHA)
06/04/90
07/17/95
Page 8 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
120227#
125151#
120014#
125146#
125145#
120191#
125147#
120285#
120288#
120316#
125149#
125148#
120017#
120165#
120296#
120328#
120659#
120300#
120660#
120144#
120058#
120114#
120259#
120138#
120302#
120115#
120228#
125152#
125153#
120139#
120422#
120176#
125154#
120322#
120124#
120661#
125155#
120315#
120003#
120317
120407#
120105#
120632#
120298A
120413
125157
Community Name
SOUTH PALM BEACH, TOWN OF
SOUTH PASADENA, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH, CITY OF
ST. AUGUSTINE, CITY OF
ST. CLOUD, CITY OF
ST. JOHNS COUNTY *
ST. LUCIE COUNTY *
ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, TOWN OF
ST. MARKS, TOWN OF
ST. PETE BEACH, CITY OF
ST. PETERSBURG, CITY OF
STARKE, CITY OF
STUART, CITY OF
SUMTER COUNTY *
SUNRISE, CITY OF
SURFSIDE, TOWN OF
SUWANNEE COUNTY*
SWEETWATER, CITY OF
TALLAHASSEE, CITY OF
TAMARAC, CITY OF
TAMPA, CITY OF
TARPON SPRINGS, CITY OF
TAVARES, CITY OF
TAYLOR COUNTY*
TEMPLE TERRACE, CITY OF
TEQUESTA, VILLAGE OF
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF
TREASURE ISLAND, CITY OF
UMATILLA, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY *
VALPARAISO, CITY OF
VENICE, CITY OF
VERNON, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VIRGINIA GARDENS, VILLAGE OF
VOLUSIA COUNTY*
WAKULLA COUNTY *
WALDO, CITY OF
WALTON COUNTY *
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WAUCHULA, CITY OF
WAUSAU, TOWN OF
WEBSTER, CITY OF
WEEKI WACHEE, TOWN OF
WELLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
USE PALM BEACH COUNTY (CID 120192) FIRM DATED
6/2/92, PANEL NUMBER 100B
County
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
ST. JOHNS COUNTY
ST. JOHNS COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
ST. JOHNS COUNTY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
WAKULLA COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
SUWANNEE COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
OKALOOSA COUNTY
SARASOTA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
WAKULLA COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HARDEE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
HERNANDO COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/78(R)
05/14/71(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/29/72(R)
10/06/72(R)
09/17/80(R)
07/06/73(R)
08/17/81(R)
04/01/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/14/71(R)
05/28/71(R)
06/18/87(R)
08/15/78(R)
03/15/82(R)
03/15/79(R)
09/29/72(R)
01/06/88(R)
09/29/72(R)
12/06/76(R)
02/15/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
05/14/71(R)
03/16/88(R)
11/16/83(R)
07/08/77(R)
06/11/71(R)
06/16/72(R)
05/07/71(R)
04/03/89(R)
08/04/88(R)
04/01/77(R)
07/30/7 1(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/29/72(R)
1 l/23/73(R)
01/16/81(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
11/16/77(R)
06/17/91(R)
06/25/76(R)
03/30/98(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/30/98
0 1/03/0 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/82
11/01/84
08/17/81
09/02/88
06/16/92
05/07/01
06/30/99
06/30/99
1 1/04/92
03/18/80
03/02/83
1 1/02/94
11/15/89
06/22/98
03/15/82
07/21/95
07/17/95
01/06/88
(NSFHA)
11/19/97
07/21/95
09/30/82
06/01/83
03/16/88
11/16/83
06/18/90
09/30/82
01/05/96
03/02/83
04/03/89
08/04/88
11/01/85
05/18/92
06/17/91
05/03/93
07/17/95
02/02/96
06/02/92
1 1/04/88
03/07/00
06/17/91
05/04/88
06/17/91
07/01/87(L)
07/23/76
Page 9 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
120662# WEST MAIMI, CITY OF
120335# WEST MELBOURNE, CITY OF
120229# WEST PALM BEACH, CITY OF
120678 WESTON, CITY OF
USE THE BROWARD COUNTY FIRM PANALS
190, 195, 280, AND 285.
120118# WESTVILLE, TOWN OF
120100# WEWAHITCHKA, CITY OF
120102# WHITE SPRINGS, TOWN OF
120299# WILDWOOD, CITY OF
125156# WILTON MANORS, CITY OF
120381# WINDERMERE, TOWN OF
120187# WINTER GARDEN, CITY OF
120271# WINTER HAVEN, CITY OF
120188# WINTER PARK, CITY OF
120295# WINTER SPRINGS, CITY OF
120594# WORTHINGTON SPRINGS, TOWN OF
120147# YANKEETOWN, TOWN OF
120235# ZEPHYRHILLS, CITY OF
120106# ZOLFO SPRINGS, TOWN OF
County
DADE COUNTY
BREVARD COUNTY
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
GULF COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
BROWARD COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
PASCO COUNTY
HARDEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/72(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/29/98(R)
06/01/87(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/04/87(R)
12/26/80(R)
10/27/72(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/30/81(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/20/71(R)
04/08/83(R)
05/04/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/17/95
01/05/96
03/01/79
12/05/90
05/17/82
06/04/87
12/26/80(M)
07/21/95
12/06/00
12/06/00
12/20/00
12/06/00
04/17/95
08/04/88(M)
03/01/84
12/17/91
05/04/88
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 426
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 422
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 10
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 20
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 4
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 3
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 10 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"FLORIDA
120580# ALFORD, TOWN OF
120576# BAY LAKE, CITY OF
120385# EAGLE LAKE, CITY OF
120386# HIGHLAND PARK, VILLAGE OF
120666# HILLCREST HEIGHTS, TOWN OF
120626# LA CROSSE, TOWN OF
120667# LAKE ALFRED, CITY OF
120341# LAKE BUENA VISTA, CITY OF
120663# OAKLAND, TOWN OF
120592# OTTER CREEK, CITY OF
120423 PAXTON, TOWN OF
120665# POLK CITY, TOWN OF
120577# REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DIST.
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
JACKSON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ALACHUA COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LEVY COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
0
0
0
1
1
Hazard Area
Identified
12/15/90(F)
12/06/00(F)
12/20/00(F)
12/20/00(F)
12/20/00(F)
08/16/88(F)
12/20/00(F)
12/06/00(F)
12/06/00(F)
08/17/79(F)
03/07/00(F)
12/20/00(F)
12/06/00(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
12/15/91
12/06/01
12/20/01
12/20/01
12/20/01
08/16/89
12/20/01
12/06/01
12/06/01
08/17/80
03/07/01
12/20/01
12/06/01
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 11 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130195#
130053#
130235#
130060#
130360
130507
130075#
130350#
130202#
130084#
130203#
130001#
130152#
130049B
130557
130040#
130558
135157#
130498#
130159#
130054#
130136#
130204#
130270#
130005#
130560
130207#
130497#
130463#
130115A
130002B
130496#
130450#
130500#
130491#
130179
130280#
130452#
130402A
130244C
130012#
130343
Communities Participating
Community Name
"GEORGIA
ABBEVILLE, CITY OF
ACWORTH, CITY OF
ADAIRSVILLE, TOWN OF
ADEL, CITY OF
AILEY, CITY OF
ALAMO, CITY OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALLENHURST, TOWN OF
ALMA, CITY OF
ALPHARETTA, CITY OF
AMERICUS, CITY OF
APPLING COUNTY*
ARAGON,CITY OF
ARGYLE, TOWN OF
ASHBURN, CITY OF
ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY
DOES NOT INCLUDE THE CITIES OF WINTERVILLE
AND BOGART.
ATKINSON COUNTY*
ATLANTA, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUGUSTA, CITY OF
AUSTELL, CITY OF
BACONTON,CITY OF
BAINBRIDGE, CITY OF
BAKER COUNTY *
BALDWIN COUNTY*
BANKS COUNTY*
BARNESVILLE, CITY OF
BARROW COUNTY*
BARTOW COUNTY *
BARTOW, CITY OF
BAXLEY, CITY OF
BEN HILL COUNTY*
BERKELEY LAKE, CITY OF
BIBB COUNTY*
FORMERLY PART OF BIBB COUNTY & CITY OF
MACON
BLACKSHEAR, CITY OF
BLAIRSVILLE, TOWN OF
BLECKLEY COUNTY*
BLOOMINGDALE, CITY OF
BOSTON, CITY OF
BOWDON, CITY OF
BRANTLEY COUNTY *
BRASELTON, TOWN OF
in the National Flood Program
County
WILCOX COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
DOUGHERTY
COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BACON COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
APPLING COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CLINCH COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
ATKINSON COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
BANKS COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
APPLING COUNTY
BEN HILL COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BLECKLEY COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
BRANTLEY COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/26/98(R)
02/15/78(R)
07/30/82(R)
09/01/77(R)
1 1/29/94
09/22/94
08/15/77(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/18/87(R)
02/15/78(R)
12/16/88(R)
12/03/98(R)
09/02/88(R)
07/03/86(R)
12/29/97
09/15/78(R)
01/13/98
10/14/71(R)
12/15/92(R)
02/15/78(R)
12/01/77(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/03/87(R)
06/19/97(R)
01/03/90(R)
03/04/98
02/04/88(R)
10/16/91(R)
09/29/89(R)
01/01/92(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/12/00(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/16/91
07/22/97(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/12/91
Current Effective
Map
09/20/96
08/18/92
09/29/89
09/15/77
04/04/75
03/18/85
06/17/86(M)
03/18/87
05/07/01
02/09/01
05/03/90
09/02/88
07/03/86(M)
05/04/92
05/07/01
05/18/92(M)
09/27/91
05/05/97
06/05/89
06/19/97
01/03/90
02/04/88
10/16/91(M)
09/29/89
01/01/92(L)
08/05/86(M)
09/06/96
12/18/84
04/17/89
06/11/76
09/06/96
05/07/01
06/17/86(M)
06/17/86(M)
09/30/88
Page 1 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130335A
130020B
130281#
130430#
130093#
130016#
130336#
130364
130323#
130019#
130022#
130518#
130374A
130097A
130571
130095#
130262#
130137#
130574
130039#
130082B
130464#
130208#
130209#
130028#
130080#
130568
130153#
130255#
130257#
130066#
130292#
130030#
130141#
130293#
130036#
130424#
130181#
130103#
130067#
130210B
130554
130041#
130157#
130418A
130048B
130052#
130465#
130355A
130086#
Community Name
BREMEN, CITY OF
BROOKLET, CITY OF
BROOKS COUNTY*
BROOKS, TOWN OF
BRUNSWICK,CITY OF
BRYAN COUNTY *
BUCHANAN, CITY OF
BUCKHEAD, TOWN OF
BUFORD, CITY OF
BULLOCH COUNTY*
BURKE COUNTY*
BUTTS COUNTY*
BYRON, CITY OF
CAIRO, CITY OF
CALHOUN COUNTY*
CALHOUN, CITY OF
CAMDEN COUNTY*
CAMILLA, CITY OF
CANDLER COUNTY
CANTON, CITY OF
CARNESVILLE, CITY OF
CARROLL COUNTY*
CARROLLTON, CITY OF
CARTERSVILLE, CITY OF
CATOOSA COUNTY*
CAVE SPRING, CITY OF
CECIL, CITY OF
CEDARTOWN, CITY OF
CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
CENTRALHATCHEE, TOWN OF
CHAMBLEE, CITY OF
CHARLTON COUNTY*
CHATHAM COUNTY*
CHATSWORTH,CITY OF
CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY*
CHATTOOGA COUNTY*
CHEROKEE COUNTY*
CHICKAMAUGA, CITY OF
CLARKESVILLE, CITY OF
CLARKSTON, CITY OF
CLAXTON, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY*
CLAYTON COUNTY*
CLAYTON, CITY OF
CLEVELAND, CITY OF
CLINCH COUNTY*
COBB COUNTY*
COFFEE COUNTY*
COLBERT, CITY OF
COLLEGE PARK, CITY OF
County
JACKSON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
HARALSON COUNTY
BULLOCH COUNTY
BROOKS COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GLYNN COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
HARALSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
BULLOCH COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
BUTTS COUNTY
PEACH COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
GORDON COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
CANDLER COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
CATOOSA COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
HEARD COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
CHARLTON COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
CHATTAHOOCHEE
COUNTY
CHATTOOGA
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
HABERSHAM
COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
EVANS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
RABUN COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
CLINCH COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
05/03/82(R)
06/27/00(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/16/83(R)
12/15/90(R)
07/09/98
05/22/95(R)
05/02/91(R)
09/15/89(R)
03/18/96(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/10/99
04/01/77(R)
06/01/84(R)
05/01/78(R)
06/27/00
07/15/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/15/90(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/25/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/01/85(R)
12/05/00
05/15/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/01/88(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/21/98(R)
08/01/80(R)
07/02/87(R)
01/06/88(R)
02/17/93(R)
07/15/88(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/30/97
06/15/78(R)
01/13/88(R)
02/01/91(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/03/79(R)
08/02/90(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/01/86(L)
07/03/86(M)
03/15/82
(NSFHA)
01/28/87
10/16/92
12/15/90
07/11/75
05/22/95
05/02/91
09/15/89
03/18/96
07/03/86(M)
09/01/86(L)
07/02/91
07/03/95
05/01/78
09/14/90
09/04/85(M)
12/15/90
04/03/78
09/29/89
07/05/84
08/09/00
12/16/88
09/30/88
05/01/88(L)
05/07/01
09/21/98
09/20/95
07/02/87
01/06/88
02/17/93
09/14/90
03/18/83
02/17/88
05/07/01
08/19/86(M)
1 1/20/00
06/19/89
02/01/91(L)
08/01/86(L)
08/18/92
02/05/97
06/03/86(M)
05/07/01
Page 2 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130058#
130135B
130059#
135158#
130211
130213#
130501#
130169
130214#
130329A
130144#
130298#
130302#
130575
130504#
130236#
130242B
130324A
130246#
130129#
130372#
130194#
130512
130131#
130304#
130509
130064A
130451#
135159#
130065#
130446B
130523#
130164A
130532#
130069#
130074#
130306#
130216#
130305#
130217#
130098#
130050A
130499#
130121#
130089#
130087#
130218#
130076#
130077B
130513
Community Name
COLQUITT COUNTY*
COLQUITT, CITY OF
COLUMBIA COUNTY*
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COMER, CITY OF
CONYERS, CITY OF
COOK COUNTY*
COOLIDGE, CITY OF
CORDELE, CITY OF
CORNELIA, CITY OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
COWETA COUNTY *
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD VILLE, CITY OF
CRISP COUNTY*
GUMMING, CITY OF
CUSSETA, CITY OF
DACULA, CITY OF
DADE COUNTY *
DAHLONEGA, CITY OF
DALLAS, CITY OF
DALTON, CITY OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DARIEN, CITY OF
DAWSON COUNTY
DAWSON, CITY OF
DAWSONVILLE,CITY OF
DECATUR COUNTY*
DECATUR, CITY OF
DEKALB COUNTY *
DILLARD, TOWN OF
DODGE COUNTY*
DONALSONVILLE, CITY OF
DOOLY COUNTY*
DORAVILLE, CITY OF
DOUGHERTY COUNTY *
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DOUGLAS, CITY OF
DOUGLASVILLE, CITY OF
DUBLIN, CITY OF
DULUTH, CITY OF
DUPONT, CITY OF
EARLY COUNTY*
EAST DUBLIN, TOWN OF
EAST ELLIJAY, CITY OF
EAST POINT, CITY OF
EATONTON, CITY OF
EFFINGHAM COUNTY *
ELBERTON, CITY OF
ELLAVILLE, CITY OF
County
FULTON COUNTY
COLQUITT COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
MUSCOGEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ROCKDALE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
CRISP COUNTY
HABERSHAM
COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
COWETA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
TALIAFERRO
COUNTY
CRISP COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
CHATTAHOOCHEE
COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
LUMPKIN COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
WHITFIELD COUNTY
TWIGGS COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
TERRELL COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
RABUN COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
DOOLY COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
DOUGHERTY
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
CLINCH COUNTY
EARLY COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
GILMER COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
ELBERT COUNTY
SCHLEY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/27/00(R)
04/01/93(R)
05/01/80(R)
10/30/70(R)
06/01/78(R)
12/01/78(R)
04/03/96(R)
07/28/95
03/18/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
03/02/83(R)
08/02/82(R)
08/12/97(R)
12/05/00
08/02/96(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/17/89(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
12/05/96
12/04/79(R)
10/17/94
07/02/8 1(R)
12/15/90(R)
09/27/94
05/21/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/11/71(R)
05/15/80(R)
10/01/92(R)
07/09/98(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/04/96(R)
09/01/77(R)
04/17/78(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/25/82(R)
05/17/90(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/02/95(R)
08/19/86(R)
11/03/99(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/19/89(R)
03/18/87(R)
04/15/86(R)
10/31/94
Current Effective
Map
07/16/97
04/01/93(L)
09/20/95
05/03/93
(NSFHA)
01/19/01
04/03/96
04/02/76
03/18/87
08/01/86(L)
03/02/83
09/08/99
09/06/96
08/02/96
06/18/90
08/19/86(M)
08/19/86(M)
05/17/89
09/18/91
1 1/08/99
02/16/90
06/03/88
12/15/90
05/21/82(M)
05/19/97
05/07/01
05/07/01
10/01/92(L)
09/20/96
06/17/86(M)
06/04/96
05/07/01
04/17/78
03/15/84
07/16/79
06/25/82(M)
05/17/90
07/20/98
06/03/86(M)
08/02/95
08/19/86(M)
08/15/90
05/07/01
06/19/89
09/03/92
04/15/86(M)
Page 3 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130090#
130276#
130365#
130570#
130314#
130249#
130432#
13043 1#
130007#
130124#
130283A
130333#
130079
130290#
130042B
130312#
130359
130550
130248#
130148B
130313A
130106B
135160#
130263#
135161#
130379#
130091A
130317#
130219#
130092#
13041 1#
130094#
130259#
130096B
130237#
130325
130573
130220#
130165#
130265A
130456A
130322#
130458#
130352A
130466#
130563
130502#
130495#
130266A
130338#
130480
130155#
130114#
130105A
Community Name
ELLIJAY, CITY OF
EMERSON, CITY OF
ETON, TOWN OF
EUHARLEE, CITY OF
ADOPTED BARTOW COUNTY FIRM DATED 9-29-89.
FAIRBURN, CITY OF
FANNIN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY *
FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF
FITZGERALD, CITY OF
FLEMINGTON, CITY OF
FLO VILLA, CITY OF
FLOWERY BRANCH, CITY OF
FLOYD COUNTY*
FOLKSTON, CITY OF
FOREST PARK, CITY OF
FORSYTE COUNTY *
FORSYTE, CITY OF
FORT GAINES, CITY OF
FORT OGLETHORPE, CITY OF
FORT VALLEY, CITY OF
FRANKLIN SPRINGS, CITY OF
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FULTON COUNTY *
GAINESVILLE, CITY OF
GARDEN CITY, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GIBSON, CITY OF
GILMER COUNTY*
GLENNVILLE, CITY OF
GLYNN COUNTY *
GOOD HOPE, CITY OF
GORDON COUNTY*
GORDON, CITY OF
GRADY COUNTY
GRAY, CITY OF
GRAYSON, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY
GREENSBORO, CITY OF
GRIFFIN, CITY OF
GROVETOWN, CITY OF
GUYTON, TOWN OF
GWINNETT COUNTY *
HABERSHAM COUNTY *
HAHIRA, CITY OF
HALL COUNTY *
HANCOCK COUNTY*
HAPEVILLE, CITY OF
HARALSON COUNTY*
HARLEM, CITY OF
HARRIS COUNTY*
HARTWELL, CITY OF
HAWKINSVILLE, CITY OF
HAZLEHURST, CITY OF
HEARD COUNTY*
County
GILMER COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BEN HILL COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BUTTS COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CHARLTON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CATOOSA COUNTY
PEACH COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HEARD COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
GLASCOCK COUNTY
GILMER COUNTY
TATTNALL COUNTY
GLYNN COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
GORDON COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SPALDING COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
HABERSHAM
COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HARALSON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HART COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY
HEARD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/15/90(R)
10/08/82(R)
09/01/90(R)
08/02/99(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/19/91(R)
07/05/83(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/15/89(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
04/15/86(R)
05/19/87(R)
06/03/86(R)
05/16/77(R)
07/04/89(R)
08/12/94
12/05/95
02/01/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
05/28/82(R)
07/17/86(R)
1 0/29/7 1(R)
07/05/83(R)
03/16/73(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/17/86(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/29/86(R)
04/15/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
07/02/9 1(R)
07/04/88(R)
04/01/96(R)
05/21/82(R)
07/22/97
03/12/00
08/27/82(R)
01/01/87(R)
01/28/77(R)
02/27/95
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
05/15/86(R)
01/31/84(R)
04/17/98
07/02/96(R)
06/15/88(R)
01/28/77(R)
12/05/90(R)
06/30/97
08/15/90(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/90
09/29/89
09/01/90(L)
05/07/01
07/19/00
03/18/96
03/18/96
12/15/89
09/30/88
09/29/86(M)
03/21/00
08/09/00
09/21/98
05/16/77
06/18/90
04/11/75
02/01/84
06/25/76(M)
05/28/82(M)
07/17/86
05/07/01
03/21/00
05/19/87
09/01/87(L)
07/17/86(M)
08/23/99
09/29/86(M)
07/17/95
02/16/95
07/02/91
07/04/88
04/01/96(L)
03/17/97
07/11/75
08/27/82(M)
01/01/87(L)
01/28/77(M)
07/01/77
07/20/98
04/02/91
05/15/86(M)
03/21/00
05/07/01
06/15/88
01/28/77(M)
12/05/90
03/17/97
08/01/79
08/01/86(L)
Page 4 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130192#
130468#
130442B
130447#
130385A
130125#
130013B
130176#
130425#
130291#
130271
130051C
130247#
130520#
130572
130440A
130420#
130345#
130222B
130519#
130375
130538
130112#
130508
130201#
130118#
130525
130188#
130567
130434#
130055#
130238#
130177#
130182#
130044B
130120#
130556
130555
130462#
130099#
130122#
130348A
130569
130395#
130123#
130100#
130326#
130127#
130441A
130469#
130167B
130294A
130223B
130506#
130011#
Community Name
HELEN, CITY OF
HENRY COUNTY *
HEPHZIBAH, TOWN OF
HIAWASSEE, CITY OF
HILLTONIA, TOWN OF
HINESVILLE,CITY OF
HOBOKEN, CITY OF
HOGANSVILLE,CITY OF
HOLLY SPRINGS, CITY OF
HOMELAND, TOWN OF
HOMER, TOWN OF
HOMERVILLE, CITY OF
HOUSTON COUNTY *
IDEAL, CITY OF
IRWIN COUNTY*
IRWINTON, CITY OF
IVEY, TOWN OF
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON, CITY OF
JASPER COUNTY*
JASPER, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JEFFERSON, CITY OF
JEFFERSONVILLE, CITY OF
JEKYLL ISLAND, STATE PARK AUTHORITY
JENKINS COUNTY *
JENKINSBURG, TOWN OF
JESUP, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY*
JONES COUNTY*
KENNESAW, CITY OF
KINGSLAND, CITY OF
LA GRANGE, CITY OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAKE CITY, CITY OF
LAKELAND, CITY OF
LAMAR COUNTY
LANIER COUNTY*
LAURENS COUNTY *
LAWRENCEVILLE, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY *
LEESBURG, CITY OF
LENOX, TOWN OF
LESLIE, CITY OF
LIBERTY COUNTY *
LILBURN, CITY OF
LOGANVILLE, CITY OF
LONG COUNTY *
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LOWNDES COUNTY *
LUMBER CITY, CITY OF
LYERLY, TOWN OF
LYONS, CITY OF
MACON COUNTY*
MACON, CITY OF
County
WHITE COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
TOWNS COUNTY
SCREVEN COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BRANTLEY COUNTY
TROUP COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
CHARLTON COUNTY
BANKS COUNTY
CLINCH COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
IRWIN COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BUTTS COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
TWIGGS COUNTY
GLYNN COUNTY
JENKINS COUNTY
BUTTS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
TROUP COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
LANIER COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY*
LANIER COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
LONG COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LOWNDES COUNTY
TELFAIR COUNTY
CHATOOGA COUNTY
TOOMBS COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
BIBB COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/03/84(R)
11/02/83(R)
06/25/76(R)
04/01/93(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/16/82(R)
04/15/86(R)
08/04/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/13/98(R)
01/03/01
07/09/82(R)
06/04/90(R)
04/03/96(R)
11/03/99
09/04/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
11/16/90(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/06/96(R)
08/27/93
09/22/95
06/04/87(R)
09/27/94
06/01/84(R)
09/29/89(R)
01/03/01
02/04/88(R)
01/11/99
09/01/90(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/01/84(R)
12/01/78(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/16/88(R)
12/29/97
06/30/97
03/06/97
05/15/80(R)
05/15/91(R)
06/17/86(R)
01/12/01
09/29/86(R)
12/01/83(R)
03/04/80(R)
07/16/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/01/92(R)
04/23/9 1(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/15/86(R)
04/03/96(R)
09/28/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/84
11/02/83
06/25/76(M)
07/06/98
07/01/91(L)
02/04/87
04/15/86(M)
08/04/87
09/14/90
09/21/98
04/18/75
07/09/82(M)
12/05/96
04/03/96
09/04/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
11/16/90
09/29/86(M)
05/19/97
04/11/75
06/04/87
08/18/92
09/29/89
02/04/88
03/17/97
08/18/92
07/03/95
08/15/89
03/01/84
09/04/86(M)
12/16/88
02/17/78
05/15/80
12/05/96
06/17/86(M)
02/09/01
10/16/92
03/04/80
07/16/82(M)
09/27/85(M)
01/01/92(L)
1 1/08/99
09/29/86(M)
09/04/85(M)
05/15/86(M)
04/03/96
09/22/99
Page 5 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130470#
130224
130225#
130226#
130536#
130250#
130342#
130357
130130#
130473#
130564
130024B
130351#
130006#
130119#
130134A
130251#
130438#
130376
130138#
130227#
130132#
130139
130510
130300A
130559
130449#
130045#
130199#
130140B
130286#
130252#
130315#
130366#
130014B
130008A
130296A
130062#
130143#
130004#
130101#
130368#
130334#
130565
130453#
130415B
130370
Community Name
MADISON COUNTY*
MADISON, CITY OF
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MARIETTA, CITY OF
MARSHALLVILLE, TOWN OF
MCCAYSVILLE, CITY OF
MCDONOUGH, CITY OF
MCDUFFIE COUNTY *
MCINTOSH COUNTY *
MERIWETHER COUNTY*
METTER, CITY OF
MIDVILLE, MUNICIPALITY OF
MIDWAY, CITY OF
MILLEDGEVILLE, CITY OF
MILLEN, CITY OF
MILLER COUNTY
MINERAL BLUFFS, CITY OF
MITCHELL COUNTY *
MOLENA, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY*
MONROE, CITY OF
MONTEZUMA, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MORELAND, TOWN OF
MORGAN COUNTY*
MORGANTON, CITY OF
MORROW, CITY OF
MOULTRIE, CITY OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MOUNT ZION, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN CITY, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN PARK, CITY OF
MURRAY COUNTY*
NAHUNTA, CITY OF
NASHVILLE, CITY OF
NELSON, CITY OF
NEWNAN, CITY OF
NEWTON COUNTY *
NEWTON, CITY OF
NORCROSS, CITY OF
NORTH HIGH SHOALS, TOWN OF
OAKWOOD, MUNICIPALITY OF
OCILLA, CITY OF
OCONEE COUNTY *
OCONEE, CITY OF
OGLETHORPE COUNTY
County
JONES COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MERIWETHER
COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MCDUFFIE COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
MERIWETHER
COUNTY
CANDLER COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BALDWIN COUNTY
JENKINS COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
COWETA COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
COLQUITT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
RABUN COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
BRANTLEY COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
COWETA COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
IRWIN COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OGLETHORPE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/87(R)
06/07/99
08/05/86(R)
02/15/78(R)
03/19/99(R)
03/01/86(R)
01/06/95
05/26/98
05/15/84(R)
07/16/90(R)
06/05/98
07/03/86(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/01/87(R)
11/29/94
03/01/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
07/25/96
09/01/90(R)
02/16/90(R)
08/01/86(R)
10/03/94
10/03/94
09/27/85(R)
03/04/98
04/02/86(R)
02/16/83(R)
05/15/79(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/09/82(R)
04/07/83(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/29/86(R)
11/15/78(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/23/82(R)
06/17/98
07/17/89(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/10/98
Current Effective
Map
08/01/87(L)
02/21/75
05/17/93
08/18/92
04/03/96
07/19/00
12/28/79
03/26/76
10/16/92
12/05/96
07/03/86(M)
09/30/81
08/01/79
09/29/89
06/10/77
03/02/93
06/05/97
04/11/75
03/17/97
02/16/95
04/03/96
03/19/76
09/27/85(M)
07/19/00
02/16/83
07/16/97
08/19/86(M)
09/01/87(L)
07/09/82(M)
05/07/01
08/15/90
09/04/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
09/29/86(M)
11/15/78
07/05/83
06/19/97
05/01/80
05/16/95
03/21/00
04/17/95
06/03/86(M)
05/28/76
Page 6 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130133#
130239#
130457#
130147#
130373#
130078#
130437A
130017B
130110#
130149A
130151#
130511#
130070#
130071A
130319A
130256#
130261#
135162#
130145#
130197B
130056#
130378#
130540
130015#
130156#
130553
130009#
130399#
130126#
130158#
130018#
130426#
130029#
130047#
130267A
130303A
130384#
130154#
130162
130081#
130287
130183#
130088#
130228A
135163#
130160
130387A
130301A
130349#
130057#
Community Name
OGLETHORPE, CITY OF
PALMETTO, CITY OF
PATTERSON, TOWN OF
PAULDING COUNTY *
PEACH COUNTY *
PEACHTREE CITY, CITY OF
PELHAM, CITY OF
PEMBROOKE, CITY OF
PERRY, CITY OF
PICKENS COUNTY *
PIERCE COUNTY *
PIKE COUNTY
PINE LAKE, CITY OF
PINEHURST, CITY OF
PLAINVILLE, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY *
POOLER, TOWN OF
PORT WENTWORTH, CITY OF
PORTERDALE, TOWN OF
POULAN, CITY OF
POWDER SPRINGS, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY*
QUITMAN, CITY OF
RABUN COUNTY *
RANDOLPH COUNTY*
COMMUNITY HAS ADOPTED 60.3(D) ORDINANCE,
EVENTHOUGH NO MAP HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR
THE COUNTY.
RAY CITY, CITY OF
REIDSVILLE, CITY OF
RICEBORO, CITY OF
RICHMOND COUNTY*
RICHMOND HILL, CITY OF
RINCON,CITY OF
RINGGOLD, CITY OF
RIVERDALE, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
ROBERTA, CITY OF
ROCKDALE COUNTY *
ROCKMART, CITY OF
ROCKY FORD, TOWN OF
ROME, CITY OF
ROOPVILLE, TOWN OF
ROSSVILLE, CITY OF
ROSWELL, CITY OF
SANDERSVILLE, CITY OF
SAVANNAH, CITY OF
SCREVEN COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY*
SENOIA, CITY OF
SMITHVILLE,CITY OF
SMYRNA, CITY OF
County
MACON COUNTY
COWETA COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
PEACH COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
DOOLY COUNTY
GORDON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BROOKS COUNTY
RABUN COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
TATTNALL COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
CATOOSA COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
COLQUITT COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ROCKDALE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
SCREVEN COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
SCREVEN COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
COWETA COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
COBB COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
10/11/90(R)
04/02/79(R)
07/03/90(R)
12/01/77(R)
04/02/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/19/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/17/89(R)
03/18/96(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/18/87(R)
12/16/88(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
03/16/73(R)
01/19/83(R)
04/30/86(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/15/90(R)
10/23/95
04/01/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/16/97
04/01/77(R)
03/01/87(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
03/04/80(R)
04/17/84(R)
02/19/87(R)
06/15/78(R)
02/15/78(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/29/86(R)
02/15/79(R)
03/04/88(R)
05/01/94(R)
09/15/78(R)
10/16/98
09/28/79(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/21/71(R)
01/06/98
09/01/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
12/15/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/96
05/07/01
04/17/89
11/08/99
07/03/90
03/18/96
04/02/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
01/19/78
07/01/87(L)
04/17/89
03/18/96
05/07/01
06/25/76(M)
06/18/87(M)
12/16/88
09/30/81
05/19/87
01/19/83
04/30/86(M)
08/18/92
03/17/97
04/01/82
06/19/85
04/01/77
03/01/87(L)
11/04/81
03/23/99
04/17/84
02/19/87
09/01/83
11/06/91
08/16/88
09/29/86(M)
01/19/01
03/04/88
05/01/94(L)
08/09/00
09/28/79
05/07/01
09/01/86(L)
09/04/87
09/01/86(L)
07/01/87(L)
06/04/87(M)
08/18/92
Page 7 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130102#
130388#
130061#
130427#
130027#
130433A
130021#
130275B
130391#
130393A
130108#
130260#
130474
130037B
130521#
130328#
130229#
130163B
130198#
130396#
130337#
130380#
130471#
130522#
130166#
130288A
130416A
130400
130401#
130408#
130170#
130460#
130404#
130171#
130231#
130173#
130422A
130253#
130063#
130175
130038#
130405#
130489#
130566
130406#
130172#
135164#
130493#
130072#
130316#
130254#
130407#
130361A
Community Name
SNELLVILLE, CITY OF
SPALDING COUNTY *
SPARKS, TOWN OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. MARYS, CITY OF
STAPLETON, CITY OF
STATESBORO, CITY OF
STATHAM, CITY OF
STEPHENS COUNTY *
STEWART COUNTY *
STOCKBRIDGE, CITY OF
STONE MOUNTAIN, CITY OF
SUGAR HILL, CITY OF
SUMMERVILLE, CITY OF
SUMTER COUNTY*
SUWANEE, CITY OF
SWAINSBORO, CITY OF
SYLVANIA, CITY OF
SYLVESTER, CITY OF
TALBOT COUNTY *
TALLAPOOSA, CITY OF
TALLULAH FALLS, CITY OF
TATTNALL COUNTY *
TAYLOR COUNTY*
TELFAIR COUNTY*
TEMPLE, CITY OF
TENNILLE, CITY OF
TERRELL COUNTY *
THOMAS COUNTY *
THOMASTON, CITY OF
THOMASVILLE, CITY OF
THUNDERBOLT, TOWN OF
TIFT COUNTY *
TIFTON, CITY OF
TOCCOA, CITY OF
TOOMBS COUNTY
TOOMSBORO, CITY OF
TOWNS COUNTY*
TRENTON, CITY OF
TREUTLEN COUNTY*
TRION, TOWN OF
TROUPE COUNTY *
TUNNELL HILL, CITY OF
TURNER COUNTY*
TWIGGS COUNTY
TY TY, CITY OF
TYBEE ISLAND, CITY OF
TYRONE, TOWN OF
UNADILLA, CITY OF
UNION CITY, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY*
UPSON COUNTY *
UVALDA, TOWN OF
County
GWINNETT COUNTY
SPALDING COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BULLOCH COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
STEWART COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
CHATOOGA COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
EMANUEL COUNTY
SCREVEN COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
HARALSON COUNTY
HABERSHAM
COUNTY
TATTNALL COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
TELFAIR COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TERRELL COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
UPSON COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
TIFT COUNTY
TIFT COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
TOOMBS COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
TOWNS COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
TREUTLEN COUNTY
CHATOOGA COUNTY
TROUP COUNTY
WHITFIELD COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
TWIGGS COUNTY
TIFT COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
DOOLY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
UPSON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/80(R)
12/11/92(R)
11/16/77(R)
03/18/87(R)
06/01/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/15/83(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/30/98
09/04/85(R)
05/06/96(R)
06/01/81(R)
02/04/88(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/17/89(R)
09/04/86(R)
07/09/82(R)
08/13/82(R)
08/13/98
02/13/97(R)
05/06/96(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/17/86(R)
02/13/97
03/05/90(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/16/77(R)
07/02/87(R)
06/01/82(R)
05/01/78(R)
12/04/84(R)
10/31/91(R)
05/01/88(R)
07/06/98(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/22/99
09/28/79(R)
12/05/90(R)
02/01/91(R)
10/13/98
03/18/96(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/14/72(R)
03/01/84(R)
07/23/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/01/86(R)
05/17/89(R)
07/09/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/80
12/19/96
11/16/77
03/18/87
07/03/95
08/19/86(M)
01/05/89
06/17/86(M)
08/15/84
07/01/87(L)
06/15/83
05/07/01
09/04/85(M)
02/09/01
06/01/81
02/04/88
09/27/85(M)
05/17/89
08/19/97
07/09/82(M)
08/13/82(M)
08/18/78
09/20/96
05/06/96
09/18/87
07/17/86(M)
07/16/76
03/05/90
12/19/96
10/31/80
07/02/87
08/17/98
08/17/98
07/16/91
05/02/91
05/01/88(L)
07/06/98
05/17/89
01/07/98
12/05/90
02/01/91(L)
03/18/96
08/17/98
06/17/86
03/18/96
12/10/82(M)
05/07/01
12/03/93
12/19/96
07/09/82(M)
Page 8 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
130200#
135165#
130232#
130073#
130289A
130116A
130180#
130185#
130184#
130111#
130187#
130233A
130369A
130240B
130186#
130417#
130025A
130178#
130190
130191A
130278#
130503
130193#
130524#
130234#
130241#
130397A
130264#
130539#
130196#
130117B
130174#
130529
Community Name
VALDOSTA, CITY OF
VERNONBURG,TOWN OF
VIDALIA, CITY OF
VIENNA, CITY OF
VILLA RICA, CITY OF
WADLEY, CITY OF
WALKER COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF LINWOOD
WALTON COUNTY *
WARE COUNTY *
WARNER ROBINS, CITY OF
WARRENTON, CITY OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WATKINSVILLE, CITY OF
WAVERLY HALL, TOWN OF
WAYCROSS, CITY OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WAYNESBORO, CITY OF
WEST POINT, CITY OF
WHEELER COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY*
WHITE, TOWN OF
WHITESBURG, CITY OF
WHITFIELD COUNTY*
WILCOX COUNTY*
WINDER, CITY OF
WOODBINE, CITY OF
WOODLAND, CITY OF
WOODSTOCK, CITY OF
WOOLSEY, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF WOOLSEY HAS ADOPTED THE
FAYETTE COUNTY FIRM DATED
WORTH COUNTY*
WRENS, CITY OF
YOUNG HARRIS,CITY OF
ZEBULON, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
LOWNDES COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
TOOMBS COUNTY
DOOLY COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
WALTON COUNTY
WARE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WARE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
TROUP COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WHITFIELD COUNTY
WILCOX COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TOWNS COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
434
375
2
104
59
21
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/19/78(R)
07/27/73(R)
09/02/88(R)
07/09/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/16/90(R)
12/02/80(R)
12/01/78(R)
07/23/82(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/87(R)
01/06/83(R)
10/11/94
09/01/89(R)
06/04/82(R)
04/23/93
02/16/90(R)
04/16/98(R)
01/15/88(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/15/88(R)
04/10/97(R)
03/17/97(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/04/88(R)
08/05/98
Current Effective
Map
08/15/83
07/02/87
09/02/88
07/09/82(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/19/86(M)
04/02/92
02/16/95
01/03/90
12/03/91
07/23/82(M)
05/01/87(L)
08/19/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/03/81
09/30/88
08/01/87(L)
01/06/83
04/30/76
09/01/89(L)
09/29/89
02/16/90
09/20/96
01/15/88
07/03/95
06/25/76(M)
09/14/90
03/18/96
03/17/97
06/17/86(M)
05/04/88
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 9 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Page 10 of 12 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
130394#
130026A
130390
130528
130309A
130362
130428
130341#
130479#
130330
130494#
130561#
130023#
130419
130311A
130467#
130221#
130481#
130113#
130277#
130472#
130448
130562#
130354#
130392B
130421
130482#
130161A
130483#
130269
130189A
130367
130284
130327#
130527#
130274#
130363
130439
130168A
130382
130339
130308
130486#
130389
130150A
Community Name
**GEORGIA
ANDERSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
AVALON, TOWN OF
AVONDALE ESTATES, CITY OF
BELLVILLE, CITY OF
BOSTWICK, TOWN OF
BOWMAN, CITY OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
DANIELSVILLE, CITY OF
DEMOREST, TOWN OF
EVANS COUNTY*
GILLSVILLE, CITY OF
GIRARD, TOWN OF
GLENWOOD, CITY OF
HAGAN, CITY OF
HART COUNTY*
HIRAM, CITY OF
ILA, CITY OF
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY*
KINGSTON, CITY OF
LITHONIA, CITY OF
LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN, CITY OF
LULA, CITY OF
LUMPKIN COUNTY
MARTIN, TOWN OF
MCINTYRE, TOWN OF
MONTROSE, TOWN OF
NEWINGTON, TOWN OF
NICHOLLS, CITY OF
OAK PARK, TOWN OF
ODUM, CITY OF
OXFORD, TOWN OF
PULASKI, TOWN OF
REST HAVEN, CITY OF
REYNOLDS, TOWN OF
RUSSELL, MUNICIPALITY OF
RUTLEDGE, TOWN OF
SALE CITY, TOWN OF
SCOTLAND, CITY OF
SHELLMAN, CITY OF
SHILOH, CITY OF
STILLMORE, TOWN OF
SUMMER, TOWN OF
SUNNY SIDE, VILLAGE OF
TALKING ROCK, TOWN OF
County
SUMTER COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
EARLY COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
EVANS COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
ELBERT COUNTY
HEARD COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HABERSHAM
COUNTY
EVANS COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
BANKS COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
EVANS COUNTY
HART COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY
BARTOW COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
BANKS COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
LUMPKIN COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
SCREVEN COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
EMANUEL COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CANDLER COUNTY
GWINNETT COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
BARROW COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
TELFAIR COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
EMANUEL COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
SPALDING COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
02/09/0 1(F)
06/03/86(F)
04/16/76(F)
05/07/01(F)
07/18/75
04/04/75(F)
04/04/75
07/08/77
09/15/78
04/04/75
03/18/85
03/21/00(F)
09/06/74
04/04/75
04/18/75
09/01/87(F)
11/08/99(F)
09/15/78
09/06/96(F)
09/29/89(F)
05/07/01(F)
09/10/76
03/21/00(F)
04/02/9 1(F)
04/04/75
04/11/75
09/15/78
09/06/74
09/29/78
07/18/75
01/03/75
04/11/75
04/04/75
06/01/81(F)
09/20/96(F)
07/21/78
08/08/75
04/04/75
08/30/74
06/11/76
04/04/75
04/11/75
09/22/78
04/11/75
06/17/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
04/29/78
06/03/86(8)
04/16/77
05/07/02
07/18/76
04/04/76
04/04/76
07/08/78
09/15/79
04/04/76
03/18/86
03/21/01
09/06/75
04/04/76
04/18/76
09/01/87(8)
10/18/75
09/15/79
09/06/97
04/18/76
05/07/02
09/10/77
03/21/01
04/02/77
04/04/76
04/11/76
09/15/79
09/06/75
09/29/79
07/18/76
01/03/76
04/11/76
04/04/76
02/03/79
09/20/97
07/21/79
08/08/76
04/04/76
08/30/75
06/11/77
04/04/76
04/11/76
09/22/79
04/11/76
06/17/78
Page 11 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
130487# TAYLORSVILLE, CITY OF
130381 TIGER, TOWN OF
130297 WINTERVILLE, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
BARTOW COUNTY
RABUN COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
0
2
0
42
42
Hazard Area Date On Which
Identified Sanctions Apply
09/29/78 09/29/79
07/11/75 07/11/76
04/11/75 04/11/76
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 12 of 12
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID
Community Name
"GUAM
660001 # GUAM, TERRITORY OF
on probation eff.:04/06/92
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
GUAM
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
11/15/85(R)
06/08/98
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID
Community Name
County
"HAWAII
155166# HAWAII COUNTY *
INCLUDING HILO AND VICINITY
150001# HONOLULU COUNTY*
[HONOLULU AND VICINITY]
150002# KAUAI COUNTY*
150003# MAUI COUNTY *
R060570
060570
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
HAWAII COUNTY 05/03/82(R)
HONOLULU COUNTY 09/03/80(R)
KAUAI COUNTY
MAUI COUNTY
4
4
0
11/04/81(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/02/95
09/30/95
09/30/95
08/03/98
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
160158#
160001#
160204#
160042#
160109#
160028#
160034#
160040#
160009#
160021#
160014#
160018#
160019#
165167#
160205#
160002#
160206#
16003 1#
160027#
160207#
160202#
160043#
160033#
160036#
160199#
160208#
160209
160161#
160041#
160053#
160210#
160132#
160046#
160078#
160067#
160005#
160163#
160102#
16021 1#
160133#
160044#
160121B
160165#
160003#
160237#
160212#
Communities
Community Name
"IDAHO
ABERDEEN, CITY OF
ADA COUNTY *
ADAMS COUNTY*
ALBION, TOWN OF
AMERICAN FALLS, CITY OF
AMMON, CITY OF
ARCO, CITY OF
BANCROFT, CITY OF
BANNOCK COUNTY *
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BENEWAH COUNTY*
BINGHAM COUNTY *
BLACKFOOT, CITY OF
ELAINE COUNTY *
BOISE COUNTY*
BOISE, CITY OF
BONNER COUNTY*
BONNERS FERRY, CITY OF
BONNEVILLE COUNTY *
BOUNDARY COUNTY*
BOVILL, CITY OF
BURLEY, CITY OF
BUTTE COUNTY*
CALDWELL, CITY OF
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CANYON COUNTY *
CARIBOU COUNTY*
CASCADE, CITY OF
CASSIA COUNTY *
CHALLIS, CITY OF
CLARK COUNTY *
CLARK FORK, CITY OF
CLEARWATER COUNTY *
COEUR D'ALENE, CITY OF
COTTONWOOD, CITY OF
COUNCIL, CITY OF
CRAIGMONT, CITY OF
CULDESAC, CITY OF
CUSTER COUNTY*
DEARY, CITY OF
DECLO, CITY OF
DONNELLY, CITY OF
DOWNEY, CITY OF
EAGLE, CITY OF
EAST HOPE, CITY OF
ELMORE COUNTY *
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
BINGHAM COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
POWER COUNTY
BONNEVILLE
COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
CARIBOU COUNTY
BANNOCK COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
BENEWAH COUNTY
BINGHAM COUNTY
BINGHAM COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
BOISE COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
BONNER COUNTY
BOUNDARY COUNTY
BONNEVILLE
COUNTY
BOUNDARY COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
CARIBOU COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
BONNER COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
NEZ PERCE COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
BANNOCK COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
BONNER COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/15/79(R)
12/18/84(R)
01/16/97
08/15/83(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/14/90(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/01/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
04/05/88(R)
04/17/84(R)
08/01/84(R)
04/22/77(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
11/13/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
03/09/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/28/84(R)
08/20/99
09/15/89(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/02/82(R)
05/01/85(R)
03/26/97
02/05/86(R)
01/20/82(R)
09/05/95(R)
06/05/85(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
02/08/85(R)
03/04/80(R)
10/06/00(R)
06/19/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/79
09/22/99
11/20/00
08/15/83
01/19/82(M)
07/19/82(M)
09/24/84(M)
09/14/90
09/05/79
07/20/98
04/15/88
10/20/98
10/20/98
04/20/00
04/05/88
09/22/99
08/04/87
08/19/85(M)
11/04/81
08/02/82
12/18/79
03/09/82(M)
06/03/86(M)
09/30/88
02/19/87
12/03/93
09/15/89
08/15/83
03/04/88
09/24/84(M)
03/15/82
05/15/80
09/02/82
05/01/85(M)
1 1/20/00
02/05/86(M)
01/20/82
03/04/88
06/05/85(M)
08/15/83
04/15/77(M)
09/16/81
09/22/99
10/06/00
03/15/94
Page 1 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
160063
160035#
160068#
160079#
160167
160136#
160060#
160061#
160004#
160127#
160087#
160138#
160057#
160227#
160064#
160169
160069#
160022#
160140#
160080#
160082
160171#
160107B
160172#
160222#
160213#
160029#
160010#
160030
160143
160214#
160228#
160074
160088#
160094#
160131#
160089#
160023#
160070#
160076#
160174#
160103#
160086#
16001 1#
160092#
160215
160104#
160216#
160177#
160217#
160106#
160197#
160175#
Community Name
EMMETT, CITY OF
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
FERDINAND, CITY OF
FERNAN LAKE, CITY OF
FILER, CITY OF
FIRTH, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
GARDEN CITY, CITY OF
GEM COUNTY *
GENESEE, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GLENNS FERRY, CITY OF
GOODING COUNTY *
GOODING, CITY OF
GRACE, CITY OF
GRANGEVILLE, CITY OF
HAILEY, CITY OF
HANSEN, CITY OF
HARRISON, CITY OF
HAYDEN LAKE, CITY OF
HEYBURN, CITY OF
HOMEDALE, CITY OF
HORSESHOE BEND, CITY OF
IDAHO CITY, CITY OF
IDAHO COUNTY *
IDAHO FALLS, CITY OF
INKOM, CITY OF
IONA, CITY OF
IRWIN, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JEROME COUNTY *
JEROME, CITY OF
JULIAETTA, CITY OF
KAMIAH, CITY OF
KELLOGG, CITY OF
KENDRICK, CITY OF
KETCHUM, CITY OF
KOOSKIA, CITY OF
KOOTENAI COUNTY *
KUNA, CITY OF
LAPWAI, CITY OF
LATAH COUNTY *
LAVA HOT SPRINGS, CITY OF
LEMHI COUNTY*
LEWIS COUNTY *
LEWISTON, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
MACKAY, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MALAD CITY, CITY OF
MALTA, TOWN OF
MCCALL, CITY OF
County
GEM COUNTY
CAMAS COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
TWIN FALLS COUNTY
BINGHAM COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
GEM COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
BEAR LAKE COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
GOODING COUNTY
GOODING COUNTY
CARIBOU COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
TWIN FALLS COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
MINIDOKA COUNTY
OWYHEE COUNTY
BOISE COUNTY
BOISE COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
BONNEVILLE
COUNTY
BANNOCK COUNTY
BONNEVILLE
COUNTY
BONNEVILLE
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEROME COUNTY
JEROME COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
NEZ PERCE COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
BANNOCK COUNTY
LEMHI COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
NEZ PERCE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/28/76(R)
03/18/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
02/17/82(R)
07/16/84(R)
12/21/83(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/10/91(R)
05/15/80(R)
04/17/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/17/89(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/15/84(R)
06/01/84(R)
04/17/78(R)
06/08/82(R)
08/03/84(R)
09/01/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/18/87(R)
12/04/84(R)
04/05/88(R)
05/02/97(R)
10/15/82(R)
09/15/78(R)
06/30/76(R)
05/15/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/14/81(R)
03/04/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/02/79(R)
02/01/80(R)
06/15/78(R)
03/18/85(R)
03/01/82(R)
02/11/76(R)
08/01/83(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/05/86(R)
02/12/86(R)
01/20/82(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/15/97(R)
04/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
03/18/85(M)
06/05/85(M)
02/17/82
(NSFHA)
09/15/83
08/19/85(M)
03/18/91
09/22/99
04/17/78
12/18/79
09/24/84(M)
07/17/89
06/19/85
06/19/85
(NSFHA)
06/01/84
03/17/97
06/08/82(M)
08/03/84(M)
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
03/18/87(M)
04/05/88
04/05/88
09/27/91
10/15/82
12/28/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/17/88
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
03/04/80
08/19/85
07/02/79
02/01/80
03/17/97
03/18/85
09/28/84
(NSFHA)
08/01/83
09/01/83
08/01/79
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
01/20/82
02/05/86
03/04/88
06/03/91
09/27/85
09/24/84(M)
04/17/89
Page 2 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
160176#
160180#
160037#
160123#
160201A
160090#
160058#
160115#
160038#
160181#
160101#
160255#
160147#
160045#
160047#
160116#
160183#
160039#
160100
160198#
160184#
160105#
160048B
160200#
160012#
160083#
160219
160186#
160026#
160187#
160098#
160189#
160110A
160093#
160025#
160114#
160096#
160117#
160193#
160084#
160062#
160016#
160071#
160099#
160024#
160154#
160017B
160230#
160091#
16023 1#
160120#
Community Name
MCCAMMON, CITY OF
MERIDIAN, CITY OF
MIDDLETON, CITY OF
MIDVALE,CITY OF
MINIDOKA COUNTY*
MOSCOW, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN HOME, CITY OF
MULLAN, CITY OF
NAMPA, CITY OF
NEW MEADOWS, CITY OF
NEZ PERCE COUNTY *
NEZPERCE, CITY OF
NOTUS, CITY OF
OAKLEY, CITY OF
OROFINO, CITY OF
OSBURN, CITY OF
PARIS, CITY OF
PARMA, CITY OF
PAUL, CITY OF
PAYETTE COUNTY *
PAYETTE, CITY OF
PECK, CITY OF
PIERCE, CITY OF
PINEHURST, CITY OF
POCATELLO, CITY OF
POST FALLS, CITY OF
POWER COUNTY*
PRESTON, CITY OF
PRIEST RIVER, CITY OF
RATHDRUM, CITY OF
REXBURG, CITY OF
RIGGINS, CITY OF
ROCKLAND, CITY OF
SALMON, CITY OF
SANDPOINT,CITY OF
SHOSHONE COUNTY *
SHOSHONE, CITY OF
SMELTERVILLE, CITY OF
SODA SPRINGS, CITY OF
SPIRIT LAKE, CITY OF
ST. ANTHONY, CITY OF
ST. MARIES, CITY OF
STITES, CITY OF
SUGAR CITY, CITY OF
SUN VALLEY, CITY OF
SWAN VALLEY, CITY OF
TENSED, CITY OF
TETON COUNTY *
TROY, CITY OF
TWIN FALLS COUNTY *
TWIN FALLS, CITY OF
County
BANNOCK COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MINIDOKA COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
ELMORE COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
NEZ PERCE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
CASSIA COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
BEAR LAKE COUNTY
CANYON COUNTY
MINIDOKA COUNTY
PAYETTE COUNTY
PAYETTE COUNTY
NEZ PERCE COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
BANNOCK COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
POWER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BONNER COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
POWER COUNTY
LEMHI COUNTY
BONNER COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
CARIBOU COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
BENEWAH COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
BONNE VILLE
COUNTY
BENEWAH COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
LATAH COUNTY
TWIN FALLS COUNTY
TWIN FALLS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/21/78(R)
03/20/92(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/19/87(R)
10/01/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/28/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/04/83(R)
08/03/89(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/01/97(R)
12/02/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/20/76(R)
02/15/84(R)
02/15/84(R)
01/20/82(R)
08/29/78(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/17/82(R)
03/19/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/17/82(R)
09/28/84(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
12/19/97(R)
04/01/77(R)
12/04/84(R)
02/17/82(R)
09/05/79(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/26/78(R)
08/15/90(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/15/88(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
04/17/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/18/79(R)
02/25/99(R)
11/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/15/78
09/22/99
12/03/93
02/19/87
10/01/86(L)
08/17/82
03/15/94
08/01/79
09/28/84
11/20/00
04/04/83
08/03/89
12/03/93
08/01/97(L)
12/02/80
09/05/79
09/24/84(M)
12/03/93
(NSFHA)
02/15/84
02/15/84
01/20/82
08/29/78(M)
07/02/79
10/16/96
02/17/82
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
08/04/87
09/28/84
06/03/91
12/19/97
04/01/77(M)
12/04/84
08/04/87
09/05/79
06/19/85
12/18/79(M)
09/30/88
03/01/82
08/15/90(M)
11/15/79
04/15/88
06/03/91
03/17/97
08/01/80(M)
08/15/78(M)
08/04/88
12/18/79
09/28/84
11/01/84
Page 3 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
160194 UCON, CITY OF
160220# VALLEY COUNTY*
160119# VICTOR, CITY OF
160118# WALLACE, CITY OF
160130# WARDNER, CITY OF
160221# WASHINGTON COUNTY*
160124# WEISER,CITY OF
160156# WESTON, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
BONNE VILLE
COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
SHOSHONE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
158
155
12
33
3
2
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
08/26/77(R) (NSFHA)
09/05/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
06/19/85(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/05/90
08/04/88(M)
12/04/86
06/19/85
02/19/87
02/19/87(R) 02/19/87
08/19/85(R) 08/19/85(M)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 4 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"IDAHO
160234# CAREY, CITY OF
160015A CHATCOLET, CITY OF
160247# CROUCH, CITY OF
160134# DUBOIS, CITY OF
160137# FRANKLIN, CITY OF
160241# GRAND VIEW, CITY OF
160259# HAMER, CITY OF
160224# LEADORE, CITY OF
160249# PLACERVILLE, CITY OF
160149 PLUMMERCITY
160153 ST. CHARLES, CITY OF
160054# STANLEY, CITY OF
160236# STAR, CITY OF
160049# WEIPPE, CITY OF
160072B WHITE BIRD, CITY OF
160085# WORLEY, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
ELAINE COUNTY
BENEWAH COUNTY
BOISE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OWYHEE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LEMHI COUNTY
BOISE COUNTY
BENEWAH COUNTY
BEAR LAKE COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
ADA COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
IDAHO COUNTY
KOOTENAI COUNTY
0
4
0
11
11
Hazard Area
Identified
04/20/00(F)
09/13/74
04/05/88(F)
09/24/84(F)
08/19/85(F)
04/03/79
02/17/88(F)
03/18/85(F)
04/05/88(F)
10/29/76
03/19/76
03/04/88(F)
09/22/99(F)
12/04/79(F)
09/18/86(F)
06/30/76(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
04/20/01
09/13/75
04/05/89
07/04/88(8)
09/05/76
04/03/80
02/17/89
06/03/78
04/05/89
10/29/77
03/19/77
03/04/89
06/28/78
12/04/79(8)
07/04/88(8)
07/04/88(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 5 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170348B
170001#
170198#
170688#
170045B
170507
170674B
170474#
170660
170617#
170055#
170228#
170437#
170414#
170583#
170358#
171021
170056#
170645B
170740#
170520#
171025
170287#
171006
170543#
170944#
170320#
170743#
170359#
170058#
170057#
170059#
170534#
170321#
170464#
171022#
170022#
171007#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"ILLINOIS
ABINGDON, CITY OF
ADAMS COUNTY*
ADDISON, VILLAGE OF
ALBANY, VILLAGE OF
ALBERS, VILLAGE OF
ALEDO, CITY OF
ALEXIS, VILLAGE OF
ALGONQUIN, VILLAGE OF
ALLERTON, VILLAGE OF
ALORTON, VILLAGE OF
ALSIP, VILLAGE OF
ALTAMONT, CITY OF
ALTON, CITY OF
AMBOY, CITY OF
ANDALUSIA, VILLAGE OF
ANTIOCH, VILLAGE OF
ARCOLA, CITY OF
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
ARMINGTON, VILLAGE OF
AROMA PARK, VILLAGE OF
ARTHUR, VILLAGE OF
ASHLAND, VILLAGE OF
ASKUM, VILLAGE OF
ATLANTA, CITY OF
ATWOOD, VILLAGE OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
BANNER, VILLAGE OF
BANNOCKBURN, VILLAGE OF
BARRINGTON HILLS, VILLAGE OF
BARRINGTON, VILLAGE OF
BARTLETT, VILLAGE OF
BARTONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BATAVIA, CITY OF
BATH, VILLAGE OF
BEACH PARK, VILLAGE OF
BEARDSTOWN, CITY OF
BEDFORD PARK, VILLAGE OF
in the National Flood Program
County
KNOX COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
PIATT COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/06/84(R)
11/15/85(R)
03/15/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
10/05/84(R)
02/11/83(R)
07/02/87(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/31/83(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/15/88(R)
01/20/82(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/17/91(R)
05/01/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
11/02/77(R)
12/02/88(R)
08/12/91
04/20/79(R)
04/23/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/10/79(R)
10/16/84(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
1 1/20/8 1(R)
01/05/84(R)
06/13/94(R)
05/02/80(R)
01/31/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/06/84(M)
01/19/96
01/16/87
06/15/81
10/05/84(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/87(M)
03/16/81
(NSFHA)
06/04/80
1 1/06/00
09/04/85(M)
05/01/84
04/15/88
01/20/82
09/03/97
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
07/03/85(M)
11/20/96
12/02/88
09/30/88
(NSFHA)
12/31/82
08/19/85(M)
03/03/97
07/02/81
09/07/00
08/10/79(M)
1 1/06/00
03/15/84
1 1/02/83
09/02/81
02/15/84
09/07/00
05/02/80(M)
11/06/00
Page Iof20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170696#
170618#
170061#
170008#
170200#
170237#
170438#
170521#
170410#
170201#
170490#
170064#
170946B
170608#
170812#
170996#
170306B
170807#
170337#
171020
170745A
170338#
170848#
170046B
170065#
170025B
170067#
170066#
170619#
170468A
170265B
170989#
170606#
170226B
170747#
171011
170068#
170069
170729#
170070
170071#
170784B
170526#
170620#
170004#
170018#
170072#
170073#
170242C
170584#
170257B
Community Name
BEECHER, VILLAGE OF
BELLEVILLE, CITY OF
BELLWOOD, VILLAGE OF
BELVIDERE, CITY OF
BENSENVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BENTON, CITY OF
BETHALTO, VILLAGE OF
BETHANY, VILLAGE OF
BIRDS, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMINGDALE, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF
BLUE ISLAND, CITY OF
BLUE MOUND, VILLAGE OF
BLUFFS, VILLAGE OF
BOLINGBROOK, VILLAGE OF
BOND COUNTY *
BONNIE, VILLAGE OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BOURBONNAIS, VILLAGE OF
BRACEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BRADFORD, VILLAGE OF
BRADLEY, VILLAGE OF
BRAID WOOD, CITY OF
BREESE, CITY OF
BRIDGEVIEW, VILLAGE OF
BROADLANDS, VILLAGE OF
BROADVIEW, VILLAGE OF
BROOKFIELD, VILLAGE OF
BROOKLYN, VILLAGE OF
BROOKPORT, CITY OF
BROUGHTON, VILLAGE OF
BROWN COUNTY *
BROWNING, VILLAGE OF
BROWNS, VILLAGE OF
BRUSSELS, VILLAGE OF
BUD A, VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO GROVE, VILLAGE OF
BURBANK, CITY OF
BUREAU COUNTY *
BURNHAM, VILLAGE OF
BURR RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
BUSH, VILLAGE OF
BYRON, CITY OF
CAHOKIA, VILLAGE OF
CAIRO, CITY OF
CALHOUN COUNTY *
CALUMET CITY, CITY OF
CALUMET PARK, VILLAGE OF
CANTON, CITY OF
CARBON CLIFF, VILLAGE OF
CARBON HILL, VILLAGE OF
County
WILL COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
BOND COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
MASSAC COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/82(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
12/14/79(R)
07/02/80(R)
01/18/80(R)
07/05/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/03/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/18/85(R)
04/28/83(R)
10/15/80(R)
01/04/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/01/92(R)
02/06/84(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/09/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
12/16/80(R)
03/28/80(R)
05/23/97
09/04/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
08/16/82(R)
08/24/84(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
07/21/83(R)
09/14/79(R)
02/09/79(R)
06/15/84(R)
06/01/81(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/04/84(R)
10/17/78(R)
02/01/78(R)
02/01/84(R)
04/01/80(R)
02/16/79(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/06/95
11/19/80
1 1/06/00
01/06/82
03/02/93
12/14/79(M)
07/02/80
01/18/80(M)
07/05/84
04/15/81
02/09/01
11/06/00
07/18/85(M)
06/15/81
09/06/95
01/04/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
11/17/82
09/29/78
(NSFHA)
09/04/86(M)
03/01/78
09/06/95
02/06/84(M)
1 1/06/00
03/09/84(M)
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
03/28/80
04/30/76
09/04/85(M)
11/01/85
08/16/82
08/24/84(M)
02/04/81
(NSFHA)
1 1/06/00
(NSFHA)
06/15/84
11/06/00
11/06/00
09/18/85(M)
12/04/84
06/27/80
02/17/88
02/01/84
11/06/00
11/06/00
07/03/85(M)
08/15/83
09/04/85(M)
Page 2 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170298#
17043 IB
170491#
170047B
170681#
170202#
170322#
170786A
170019#
170250A
170716B
170269B
170475#
170621#
170810#
170661B
170274#
170452#
170453#
170622#
170894#
170026#
170023#
170698#
170052#
170601#
171027
170288
170492
170721#
17001 IB
170576#
170075#
170076#
170074#
170535B
170926#
170238B
170077
170289#
170203#
170940#
170042#
170748#
170044A
170193#
170258B
170585#
170439#
Community Name
CARBONDALE, CITY OF
CARLINVILLE, CITY OF
CARLOCK, VILLAGE OF
CARLYLE, CITY OF
CARMI, CITY OF
CAROL STREAM, VILLAGE OF
CARPENTERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CARRIER MILLS, VILLAGE OF
CARROLL COUNTY *
CARROLLTON, CITY OF
CARTERVILLE, CITY OF
CARTHAGE, CITY OF
CARY, VILLAGE OF
CASEYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CASS COUNTY *
CATLIN, VILLAGE OF
CAVE-IN-ROCK, VILLAGE OF
CENTRAL CITY, VILLAGE OF
CENTRALIA, CITY OF
CENTREVILLE, CITY OF
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY *
CHAMPAIGN, CITY OF
CHANDLERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CHANNAHON, VILLAGE OF
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHATHAM, VILLAGE OF
CHATSWORTH, TOWN OF
CHEBANSE, VILLAGE OF
CHENOA, CITY OF
CHERRY VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
CHERRY, VILLAGE OF
CHESTER, CITY OF
CHICAGO HEIGHTS, CITY OF
CHICAGO RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
CHICAGO, CITY OF
CHILLICOTHE, CITY OF
CHRISTIAN COUNTY *
CHRISTOPHER, CITY OF
CICERO, TOWN OF
CIS SNA PARK, VILLAGE OF
CLARENDON HILLS, VILLAGE OF
CLARK COUNTY*
CLAY CITY, VILLAGE OF
CLEVELAND, VILLAGE OF
CLINTON COUNTY*
CLINTON, CITY OF
COAL CITY, VILLAGE OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF EILEEN
COAL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
COLLINSVILLE, CITY OF
County
JACKSON COUNTY
MACOUPIN COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
COLES COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DE WITT COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/01/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/17/81(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/15/83(R)
02/03/00
08/19/87(R)
07/02/87(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/16/81(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/01/83(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
12/18/84(R)
03/04/80(R)
03/01/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/18/86(R)
02/15/83(R)
09/28/84(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
08/13/91
05/25/78(R)
06/11/76(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/14/83(R)
11/16/83(R)
11/15/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
06/01/81(R)
02/02/77(R)
05/27/93
08/19/87(R)
08/14/00
09/29/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
11/04/88(R)
01/18/84(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/15/83(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/01/79
09/04/86(M)
02/09/01
09/04/85(M)
01/02/81
01/06/82
08/17/81
07/03/85(M)
12/15/83
03/05/76
08/19/87(M)
07/02/87(M)
10/18/83
03/16/81
11/15/85
09/04/85(M)
12/01/83
03/18/96
12/18/84
03/04/80
03/01/84
01/16/81
09/18/86
09/06/95
09/28/84
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
01/14/83(M)
11/16/83
11/06/00
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
02/02/77
04/07/78
08/19/87(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/88
07/02/80
11/04/88
01/18/84
08/01/80
05/01/87(L)
09/29/89
09/27/85(M)
12/04/79
02/18/81
Page 3 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170749#
170510#
170416#
170054#
170494
170586#
170181
170078#
170079#
170939#
170291#
170699#
170080#
170700#
170646#
170682#
170476#
170243#
170987#
170278#
170522#
170851A
170495#
170662#
170750#
171076
170808#
170182#
170012#
170429#
170647B
171028#
170361#
170547B
170081#
170192#
170259
170949#
170082#
170417#
170083#
170194#
170875#
170204#
171072#
171030
170197#
170624#
Community Name
COLONA, VILLAGE OF
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
COMPTON, VILLAGE OF
COOK COUNTY *
COOKSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CORDOVA, VILLAGE OF
CORTLAND, TOWN OF
COUNTRY CLUB HILLS, CITY OF
COUNTRYSIDE, CITY OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY*
CRESCENT CITY, VILLAGE OF
CREST HILL, CITY OF
CRESTWOOD, VILLAGE OF
CRETE, VILLAGE OF
CREVE COEUR, VILLAGE OF
CROSSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CRYSTAL LAKE, CITY OF
CUBA, CITY OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY *
DALLAS CITY, CITY OF
DALTON CITY, VILLAGE OF
DALZELL, VILLAGE OF
DANVERS, VILLAGE OF
DANVILLE, CITY OF
DARIEN, CITY OF
DAVIS JUNCTION, VILLAGE OF
DE KALB COUNTY *
DE KALB, CITY OF
DE PUE, VILLAGE OF
DECATUR, CITY OF
DEER CREEK, VILLAGE OF
DEER PARK, VILLAGE OF
DEERFIELD, VILLAGE OF
DELANO, VILLAGE OF
DBS PLAINES, CITY OF
DEWITT COUNTY *
DIAMOND, VILLAGE OF
DIVERNON, VILLAGE OF
DIXMOOR, VILLAGE OF
DIXON, CITY OF
DOLTON, VILLAGE OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY*
DOWELL, VILLAGE OF
DOWNERS GROVE, VILLAGE OF
DOWNS, VILLAGE OF
Downs is shown as an area not included on the McLean
County FIRM. There is a countywide study underway that
maps Downs that is scheduled to become effective in Feb
2001.
DUNLAP, VILLAGE OF
DUPAGE COUNTY*
DUPO, VILLAGE OF
County
HENRY COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PIATT COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DE WITT COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/17/80(R)
09/05/90(R)
06/18/85(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/11/76(R)
12/01/81(R)
11/30/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
03/14/96(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/16/79(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/23/8 1(R)
12/18/84(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/18/96(R)
10/18/83(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/18/83(R)
02/01/80(R)
12/16/98
09/04/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/03/97(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/29/89(R)
05/25/78(R)
05/15/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
04/15/88(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/17/95(R)
12/05/89(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
05/31/00
03/18/93
04/15/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/17/80
09/05/90
(NSFHA)
1 1/06/00
(NSFHA)
12/01/81
(NSFHA)
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
06/03/86
09/30/88
09/06/95
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
07/16/80
12/18/84
09/04/85
01/19/83
07/18/85
10/18/83
12/04/84
09/24/84(M)
02/09/01
07/18/83
02/01/80
09/21/00
09/21/00
05/01/85
08/01/79
07/03/85(M)
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
09/04/87(M)
11/06/00
09/29/89
(NSFHA)
05/15/84
1 1/06/00
07/06/98
11/06/00
05/17/95
12/05/89
10/18/83
02/09/01
10/18/88
02/04/81
Page 4 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170539A
170789#
170423C
170440#
170873B
170916#
170625#
170752#
170323#
170085#
170587#
170649#
170626#
170937#
170441#
170229B
171026
17025 1#
170087#
170275#
170088#
171010#
170876#
170205#
170089#
170313#
170689#
170726#
170090#
170577#
170733
170424#
170680#
170627#
170663
170895#
170818#
170628#
170027#
170043B
170552#
170091#
170028
170084#
170092#
170093#
170425B
170527B
171017#
170362#
Community Name
DUQUOIN, CITY OF
DURAND, VILLAGE OF
DWIGHT, VILLAGE OF
EAST ALTON, VILLAGE OF
EAST BROOKLYN, VILLAGE OF
EAST CAPE GIRARDEAU, VILLAGE OF
EAST CARONDELET, VILLAGE OF
EAST DUBUQUE, CITY OF
EAST DUNDEE, VILLAGE OF
EAST HAZEL CREST, VILLAGE OF
EAST MOLINE, CITY OF
EAST PEORIA, CITY OF
EAST ST. LOUIS, CITY OF
EDWARDS COUNTY *
EDWARDSVILLE, CITY OF
EFFINGHAM, CITY OF
ELBURN, VILLAGE OF
ELDRED, VILLAGE OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELIZABETHTOWN, VILLAGE OF
ELK GROVE VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
ELKHART, VILLAGE OF
USE THE LOGAN COUNTY [170427] FIRM
ELKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ELMHURST, CITY OF
ELMWOOD PARK, VILLAGE OF
ELSAH, VILLAGE OF
ERIE, VILLAGE OF
EUREKA, CITY OF
EVANSTON, CITY OF
EVANSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
EVERGREEN PARK, VILLAGE OF
FAIRBURY, CITY OF
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
FAIRMONT CITY, VILLAGE OF
FAIRMOUNT, VILLAGE OF
FAIRVIEW HGTS., CITY OF
FARMER CITY, CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FISHER, VILLAGE OF
FLORA, CITY OF
FLORENCE, VILLAGE OF
FLOSSMOOR, VILLAGE OF
FOOSLAND, VILLAGE OF
FORD HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
FOREST PARK, VILLAGE OF
FOREST VIEW, VILLAGE OF
FORREST, VILLAGE OF
FORRESTON, VILLAGE OF
FORSYTH, VILLAGE OF
FOX LAKE, VILLAGE OF
County
PERRY COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
JO DAVIESS COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
JERSEY COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
DE WITT COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
11/01/90(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/09/82(R)
12/04/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
10/18/83(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/22/78(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
11/01/79(R)
12/07/84(R)
01/18/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/30/92(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/15/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/18/84(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
02/15/85(R)
07/18/85(R)
ll/26/82(R)
04/15/88(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/16/90(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/28/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/29/89(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/03/84(R)
08/05/85(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
11/05/80(R)
10/31/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/22/78(R)
02/11/83(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/19/87(R)
01/06/88(R)
09/29/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/87(M)
09/02/81
11/01/90(L)
03/18/80
07/09/82(M)
12/04/85
03/02/81
10/18/83
06/01/84
1 1/06/00
10/15/82
12/04/79
11/01/79
12/07/84(M)
01/18/84
07/18/85(M)
08/01/83
02/17/89
09/15/83
1 1/06/00
09/02/88
12/18/84
05/16/95
1 1/06/00
02/18/81
02/15/85
07/18/85(M)
11/06/00
04/15/88
(NSFHA)
04/16/90
04/17/85(M)
03/28/80
(NSFHA)
07/03/78
09/29/89
06/15/81
04/03/84
08/05/85(M)
08/15/83
11/06/00
(NSFHA)
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
07/02/87(M)
08/19/87(M)
01/06/88
09/07/00
Page 5 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170477#
170478#
170701#
170899#
170094#
170790#
170640#
170241#
170690#
170511#
170597#
175168A
170349#
170900#
170261#
170284#
170325#
170183#
170665
170049B
170326
170433B
170293#
170279B
170442
170207#
170095#
170206#
170096#
170097#
171031
170560
170098#
170954#
170314#
170443#
170363#
170683#
170364#
170285#
170901#
170252B
170862#
170754#
170007B
171057
Community Name
Ordinance #2000- 17 adopted the revised map panels 0005,
0015, 0110 issued March 7, 2000.
Ordinance #2000- 17 adopted the revised map panels 0005,
0015, 0110 issued March 7, 2000.
FOX RIVER GROVE, VILLAGE OF
FOX RIVER VALLEY GARDENS, VILLAGE OF
FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY*
FRANKLIN PARK, VILLAGE OF
FREEBURG, VILLAGE OF
FREEPORT, CITY OF
FULTON COUNTY*
FULTON, CITY OF
FULTS, VILLAGE OF
GALATIA, VILLAGE OF
GALENA, CITY OF
GALESBURG, CITY OF
GALLATIN COUNTY *
GARDNER, VILLAGE OF
GENESEO, CITY OF
GENEVA, CITY OF
GENOA, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GERMANTOWN, VILLAGE OF
GILBERTS, VILLAGE OF
GILLESPIE,CITY OF
OILMAN, CITY OF
GLADSTONE, VILLAGE OF
GLEN CARBON, VILLAGE OF
GLEN ELLYN, VILLAGE OF
GLENCOE, VILLAGE OF
GLENDALE HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
GLENVIEW, VILLAGE OF
GLENWOOD, VILLAGE OF
GODFREY, VILLAGE OF
GOLCONDA, CITY OF
GOLF, VILLAGE OF
GORHAM, VILLAGE OF
GRAFTON, CITY OF
GRANITE CITY, CITY OF
GRAYSLAKE, VILLAGE OF
GRAYVILLE, CITY OF
GREEN OAKS, VILLAGE OF
GREEN ROCK, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
GREENUP,VILLAGE OF
GREENVIEW, VILLAGE OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF GREENWOOD HAS ADOPTED THE
MCHENRY COUNTY (170732) FIRM DATED 5-19-97.
County
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
JO DAVIESS COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MACOUPIN COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JERSEY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
BOND COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/04/80(R)
03/04/80(R)
11/01/79(R)
10/25/96
09/15/78(R)
01/18/80(R)
05/16/77(R)
01/17/86(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/20/73(R)
06/19/85(R)
02/01/84(R)
04/08/85(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/03/81(R)
05/25/84(R)
02/11/76(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/04/96
08/04/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
03/09/84(R)
07/18/83(R)
01/17/79(R)
12/16/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/15/78(R)
06/18/93
02/11/83(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/02/93
09/30/77(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/02/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
12/04/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/04/80
03/04/80
09/06/95
08/29/80
11/06/00
01/18/80(M)
05/16/77
03/19/90
05/17/82
09/04/85
06/03/86
09/05/75
06/19/85
02/01/84
06/18/87
09/30/92
08/03/81
05/25/84
(NSFHA)
07/20/84(M)
08/04/87(M)
09/30/88
03/09/84(M)
(NSFHA)
01/22/82
11/06/00
01/01/82
11/06/00
11/06/00
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
01/26/79
10/23/81
06/01/78
09/07/00
08/24/84(M)
09/07/00
07/16/80
08/05/85
06/17/86(M)
08/04/88
09/02/88
08/05/85(M)
Page 6 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170256#
170280#
170365#
171005#
170734#
170271#
170327#
170588#
170267#
170099#
170755#
170738#
170444#
170479#
170100#
170101
170465#
170366#
170102#
170277#
170739#
170456#
170717#
170497#
170103#
170367#
170445#
170956A
170513C
170589#
170104#
170253#
170184#
170105#
170106#
170107#
170936#
170109#
170667A
170791B
170498
170553#
170480#
170792B
170178#
170307
170110#
170111#
170756
Community Name
GRUNDY COUNTY *
GULFPORT, VILLAGE OF
GURNEE, VILLAGE OF
HAINESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HAMBURG, VILLAGE OF
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HAMPSHIRE, VILLAGE OF
HAMPTON, VILLAGE OF
HANCOCK COUNTY *
HANOVER PARK, VILLAGE OF
HANOVER, VILLAGE OF
HARDIN, VILLAGE OF
HARTFORD, VILLAGE OF
HARVARD, CITY OF
HARVEY, CITY OF
HARWOOD HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
HAVANA, CITY OF
HAWTHORN WOODS, VILLAGE OF
HAZEL CREST, VILLAGE OF
HENDERSON COUNTY *
HENRY COUNTY *
HENRY, CITY OF
HERRIN, CITY OF
HEYWORTH, VILLAGE OF
HICKORY HILLS, CITY OF
HIGHLAND PARK, CITY OF
HIGHLAND, CITY OF
HILLCREST, VILLAGE OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HILLSDALE, VILLAGE OF
HILLSIDE, VILLAGE OF
HILLVIEW, VILLAGE OF
HINCKLEY, VILLAGE OF
HINSDALE, VILLAGE OF
HODGKINS, VILLAGE OF
HOFFMAN ESTATES, VILLAGE OF
HOLIDAY HILLS, VILLAGE OF
HOMEWOOD, VILLAGE OF
HOOPESTON, CITY OF
HOPEDALE, VILLAGE OF
HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
HULL, VILLAGE OF
HUNTLEY, VILLAGE OF
HURST, CITY OF
HUTSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
INA, VILLAGE OF
INDIAN HEAD PARK, VILLAGE OF
INVERNESS, VILLAGE OF
IPAVA, VILLAGE OF
County
GRUNDY COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
JO DAVIESS COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/18/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/11/95(R)
02/15/84(R)
10/18/83(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
01/06/82(R)
04/30/86(R)
11/15/78(R)
05/04/89(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/01/79(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/17/78(R)
02/29/80(R)
07/23/8 1(R)
11/02/83(R)
12/02/80(R)
03/04/86(R)
01/17/85(R)
01/07/83(R)
04/16/90(R)
12/01/83(R)
07/16/80(R)
11/05/80(R)
11/05/86(R)
05/23/94
08/19/86(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/11/76(R)
01/31/94(R)
09/21/00(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/14/79(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/01/82(R)
08/15/77(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/11/76(R)
06/11/76(R)
12/15/92(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/15/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/30/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/15/94
10/15/85
09/07/00
09/07/00
02/15/84
10/18/83
1 1/02/95
01/06/82
04/30/86
11/06/00
05/04/89
08/01/83
05/01/79
11/15/79
11/06/00
(NSFHA)
09/30/83
09/03/97
11/06/00
03/04/86
01/17/85
01/07/83(M)
04/16/90
02/09/01
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
11/05/86
09/15/78
08/19/86(M)
07/19/82
1 1/06/00
09/30/83
09/21/00
01/16/81
11/06/00
11/06/00
04/01/82
11/06/00
07/03/85(M)
07/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/18/86
05/19/97
09/18/85(M)
03/15/84
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
(NSFHA)
Page 7 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
17073 1#
170793#
170370#
170210#
170927#
170516#
170305A
171004#
170312#
170315C
170902#
170486#
170817B
170718#
170702#
170757#
170245#
170112#
170735#
170896#
170879A
170336#
170339#
170563#
170736#
170508#
170341#
170113#
170286#
170860B
170371#
170858B
170758#
170185#
170186#
170675B
170914#
170350B
170115#
170400#
170401#
170911
170759
170372#
170373#
170357#
170374#
170375#
170376#
170481#
170915#
170805B
Community Name
IROQUOIS COUNTY*
IROQUOIS, VILLAGE OF
ISLAND LAKE, VILLAGE OF
ITASCA, VILLAGE OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEROME, VILLAGE OF
JERSEY COUNTY *
JERSEYVILLE, CITY OF
JO DAVIESS COUNTY *
JOHNSBURG, VILLAGE OF
JOHNSON COUNTY *
JOHNSTON CITY, CITY OF
JOLIET, CITY OF
JOPPA, VILLAGE OF
JUNCTION, VILLAGE OF
JUSTICE, VILLAGE OF
KAMPSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
KANE COUNTY *
Includes the Village of Valley View
KANGLEY, VILLAGE OF
KANKAKEE COUNTY *
KANKAKEE, CITY OF
KARNAK, VILLAGE OF
KASKASKIA, VILLAGE OF
KEITHSBURG, CITY OF
KENDALL COUNTY *
KENILWORTH, VILLAGE OF
KEWANEE, CITY OF
KEYESPORT, VILLAGE OF
KILDEER, VILLAGE OF
KINCAID, VILLAGE OF
KINGSTON MINES, VILLAGE OF
KINGSTON, VILLAGE OF
KIRKLAND, CITY OF
KIRKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
KNOX COUNTY *
KNOXVILLE, CITY OF
LA GRANGE PARK, VILLAGE OF
LA SALLE COUNTY *
LA SALLE, CITY OF
LADD, VILLAGE OF
LAFAYETTE, VILLAGE OF
LAKE BARRINGTON, VILLAGE OF
LAKE BLUFF, VILLAGE OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE FOREST, CITY OF
LAKE VILLA, VILLAGE OF
LAKE ZURICH, VILLAGE OF
LAKE-IN-THE-HILLS, VILLAGE OF
LAKEMOOR, VILLAGE OF
LAKEWOOD, VILLAGE OF
County
IROQUOIS COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
JERSEY COUNTY
JERSEY COUNTY
JO DAVIESS COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
MASSAC COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/16/82(R)
11/02/77(R)
08/04/93
06/15/79(R)
10/31/00
11/16/83(R)
02/01/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
01/18/84(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/24/84(R)
04/01/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/02/83(R)
01/05/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
04/17/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/15/83(R)
07/19/82(R)
08/19/83(R)
03/04/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
04/01/93(R)
11/16/83(R)
11/16/83(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/16/87(R)
08/24/84(R)
02/27/84(R)
11/15/78(R)
12/16/88
03/18/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
01/26/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
05/11/81(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
07/05/83(R)
07/05/83(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/88
09/30/88
09/16/82
11/02/77
08/08/80
06/02/94
03/04/77
11/16/83
02/01/84
07/18/85(M)
01/18/84
06/18/80
08/24/84(M)
04/01/82
09/06/95
03/02/83
01/05/84
11/06/00
08/01/83
05/19/97
09/24/84(M)
09/06/96
02/03/93
1 1/06/9 1(M)
09/04/85
09/15/83
07/19/82
11/06/00
03/04/86
08/19/85(M)
09/03/97
04/01/93(L)
11/16/83
09/21/00
09/21/00
07/16/87(M)
08/24/84(M)
02/27/84(M)
1 1/06/00
08/06/82
03/18/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/03/97
09/07/00
1 1/06/00
09/03/97
09/03/97
09/03/97
01/21/98
05/15/84
09/04/85(M)
Page 8 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170116#
17041 1#
170528B
170629#
170413#
170925#
170117#
171044
170499#
170782B
170500
170377#
170428#
170378#
170379#
170342#
17021 1#
170514B
170762#
170929#
170794#
170795B
170703#
170427#
170281#
170212#
170763#
170380#
170722#
170523C
170917#
170119#
170120#
171009#
170473
170928#
170930#
170436#
170446#
170571
170029#
170301#
170704#
170013B
170549#
170878#
171018#
170482#
170719#
Community Name
LANSING, VILLAGE OF
LAWRENCEVILLE, CITY OF
LEAF RIVER, VILLAGE OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY*
LELAND GROVE, CITY OF
LEMONT, VILLAGE OF
LERNA, VILLAGE OF
LEROY, CITY OF
LEWISTOWN, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LIBERTYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LINCOLN, CITY OF
LINCOLNSHIRE, VILLAGE OF
LINDENHURST, VILLAGE OF
LISBON, VILLAGE OF
LISLE, VILLAGE OF
LITCHFIELD, CITY OF
LIVERPOOL, VILLAGE OF
LIVINGSTON COUNTY*
LIVINGSTON, VILLAGE OF
LOAMI, VILLAGE OF
LOCKPORT, CITY OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LOMAX, VILLAGE OF
LOMBARD, VILLAGE OF
LONDON MILLS, VILLAGE OF
LONG GROVE, VILLAGE OF
LOVES PARK, CITY OF
LOVINGTON, VILLAGE OF
LYNDON, VILLAGE OF
LYNWOOD, VILLAGE OF
LYONS, VILLAGE OF
MACHESNEY PARK, VILLAGE OF
MACOMB, CITY OF
MACON COUNTY *
MACOUPIN COUNTY*
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, CITY OF
MAGNOLIA, VILLAGE OF
MAHOMET, VILLAGE OF
MAKANDA, VILLAGE OF
MANHATTAN, VILLAGE OF
MANLIUS, VILLAGE OF
MANSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
MANTENO, VILLAGE OF
MAPLE PARK, VILLAGE OF
MARENGO, CITY OF
MARION, CITY OF
County
COOK COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COLES
MCLEAN COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
MCDONOUGH
COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MACOUPIN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
PIATT COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/81(R)
07/16/84(R)
06/18/87(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
04/15/88(R)
12/16/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
01/29/97
05/02/80(R)
10/05/84(R)
08/10/98
01/16/80(R)
10/16/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/02/80(R)
06/11/82(R)
09/17/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/06/96
02/27/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/02/88(R)
04/03/84(R)
10/17/78(R)
10/15/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/01/84(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
12/29/00
12/04/84(R)
09/18/96
04/15/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
03/15/82(R)
10/15/82(R)
01/28/83(R)
05/11/95
11/02/77(R)
10/07/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/15/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/06/00
07/16/84
06/18/87(M)
07/02/81
07/06/98
12/16/82
1 1/06/00
02/09/01
10/05/84(M)
(NSFHA)
09/07/00
09/02/88
09/07/00
09/03/97
06/01/82
09/17/80
08/19/85(M)
12/15/83
03/31/78
02/27/84(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/06/95
09/02/88
04/03/84
10/17/78
01/03/90
11/06/00
01/21/83
09/18/85(M)
09/01/83
11/06/00
11/06/00
10/18/83
(NSFHA)
12/04/84
01/06/78
04/15/82
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
06/15/83
03/15/82
09/06/95
01/28/83(M)
06/09/78
11/02/77
08/04/87
01/02/92
09/15/83
Page 9 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170572
175169#
170650C
170994#
170040#
170041#
170630#
170466C
170463#
170467#
170123#
170053#
170684
170124#
170262B
170829A
170121#
170999#
170732#
170483#
17093 1#
170501
170266
170573D
170125#
170505#
170403#
170806#
170517#
170126#
170469#
170381#
170127#
170590#
170294#
170659B
170908B
170343#
170838
170651
171019#
170705#
170591#
170340#
170676B
170509#
170992#
170328#
Community Name
MARK, VILLAGE OF
MARKHAM, CITY OF
MARQUETTE HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MARTINSVILLE, CITY OF
MASCOUTAH, CITY OF
MASON CITY, CITY OF
MASON COUNTY *
MASSAC COUNTY *
MATTESON, VILLAGE OF
MATTOON, CITY OF
MAUNIE, VILLAGE OF
MAYWOOD, VILLAGE OF
MAZON, VILLAGE OF
MC CULLOM LAKE, VILLAGE OF
MCCOOK, VILLAGE OF
MCDONOUGH COUNTY *
MCHENRY COUNTY*
MCHENRY, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF MCHENRY SHORES
MCLEAN COUNTY *
MCLEAN, VILLAGE OF
MCLEANSBORO, CITY OF
MCNABB, VILLAGE OF
MELROSE PARK, VILLAGE OF
MENARD COUNTY *
MENDOTA, CITY OF
MERCER COUNTY*
MEREDOSIA, VILLAGE OF
MERRIONETTE PARK, VILLAGE OF
METROPOLIS, CITY OF
METTAWA, VILLAGE OF
MIDLOTHIAN, VILLAGE OF
MILAN, VILLAGE OF
MILFORD, VILLAGE OF
MILL CREEK, VILLAGE OF
MILLEDGEVILLE,VILLAGE OF
MILLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
MILLSTADT, VILLAGE OF
MINIER, VILLAGE OF
MINOOKA, VILLAGE OF
MOKENA, VILLAGE OF
MOLINE, CITY OF
MOMENCE, CITY OF
MONMOUTH, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY*
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MONTGOMERY, VILLAGE OF
County
PUTNAM COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MASSAC COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COLES COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MCDONOUGH
COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MASSAC COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/03/85(R)
07/27/73(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
03/18/85(R)
09/27/96(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
07/18/85(R)
02/01/84(R)
07/05/83(R)
08/16/82(R)
12/18/85(R)
02/11/98
08/11/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/16/91(R)
06/17/97
09/30/8 1(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/18/85(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/04/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/02/88(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
04/15/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
10/18/83(R)
03/28/80(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
10/05/84(R)
06/18/87(R)
06/01/82(R)
01/31/83(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
03/12/92(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/01/80(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/15/86(R)
02/03/00
08/15/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
07/03/85(M)
02/01/84
(NSFHA)
1 1/04/88
06/15/81
07/18/85(M)
02/01/84
07/05/83
11/06/00
12/18/85
01/09/74
11/06/00
09/27/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
11/06/00
01/02/81
01/21/98
07/05/83
02/09/01
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
11/06/00
09/02/88
01/05/84
01/03/86
04/15/82
1 1/06/00
10/18/83
09/07/00
1 1/06/00
11/05/86
09/30/88
10/05/84(M)
06/18/87(M)
06/01/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/06/95
1 1/06/00
02/01/80
1 1/20/96
09/30/88(M)
04/05/88
01/09/81
08/15/79
Page 10 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170550#
170903#
170263#
170691#
170128#
170652#
170998#
170565#
170564
170672#
170129#
170308#
170962#
170020B
170599#
170963A
170382#
170302#
170213#
170678B
170767#
170554#
170418#
170768A
170632#
170050B
170555B
170246#
170706#
170344#
170303B
170130#
170502#
170131
170329#
170383#
170384#
170653#
170822#
170132#
170133#
170134#
170214#
170136#
170137#
170215#
170861B
170796
170633#
170030
170525#
170404B
Community Name
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MORGAN COUNTY*
MORRIS, CITY OF
MORRISON, CITY OF
MORTON GROVE, VILLAGE OF
MORTON, VILLAGE OF
MOULTRIE COUNTY *
MOUND CITY, CITY OF
MOUNDS, CITY OF
MOUNT CARMEL, CITY OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MOUNT ZION, VILLAGE OF
MT. CARROLL, CITY OF
MUDDY, VILLAGE OF
MUNCIE, VILLAGE OF
MUNDELEIN, VILLAGE OF
MURPHYSBORO, CITY OF
NAPERVILLE, CITY OF
NASHVILLE, CITY OF
NAUVOO, CITY OF
NEBO, VILLAGE OF
NELSON, VILLAGE OF
NEOGA, CITY OF
NEW ATHENS, VILLAGE OF
NEW BADEN, VILLAGE OF
NEW CANTON, TOWN OF
NEW HAVEN, VILLAGE OF
NEW LENOX, VILLAGE OF
NEWARK, VILLAGE OF
NEWTON, CITY OF
NILES, VILLAGE OF
NORMAL, TOWN OF
NORRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
NORTH AURORA, VILLAGE OF
NORTH BARRINGTON, VILLAGE OF
NORTH CHICAGO, CITY OF
NORTH PEKIN, VILLAGE OF
NORTH UTICA, VILLAGE OF
NORTHBROOK, VILLAGE OF
NORTHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
NORTHLAKE, CITY OF
OAK BROOK, VILLAGE OF
OAK FOREST, CITY OF
OAK LAWN, VILLAGE OF
OAKBROOK TERRACE, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
OAKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
OFALLON, CITY OF
OGDEN, VILLAGE OF
OGLE COUNTY*
OGLESBY, CITY OF
County
PIATT COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COLES COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/91(R)
01/17/86(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/02/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
03/05/90(R)
12/22/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/05/89(R)
07/11/95
07/02/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/06/84(R)
08/16/96(R)
08/01/84(R)
04/15/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
03/23/84(R)
09/04/86(R)
04/24/97
08/05/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/01/83(R)
05/25/78(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/18/83(R)
12/05/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
12/18/84(R)
01/17/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
12/07/84(R)
05/25/78(R)
10/15/82(R)
08/02/94
04/05/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/15/91
01/17/86
09/15/94
09/30/88
11/06/00
09/02/88
08/05/85(M)
03/05/90
(NSFHA)
07/16/80
11/06/00
02/15/84
09/18/85(M)
09/29/86(M)
12/05/89
02/23/79
09/03/97
08/24/79
05/18/92
02/06/84(M)
08/16/96
08/01/84
04/15/88
08/05/85(M)
03/23/84(M)
09/04/86(M)
09/26/75
08/05/86
09/06/95
06/01/82
09/24/84(M)
11/06/00
02/09/01
1 1/06/00
03/16/81
09/03/97
09/07/00
06/04/80
12/18/84
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
02/18/81
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
02/18/81
04/30/86
(NSFHA)
10/15/82
04/05/88
09/04/85(M)
Page 11 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170679B
170385#
170566#
170581D
170139#
170248B
170295#
170282#
170641A
170530#
170172#
170140#
170345#
170405#
175170#
170179#
170142#
170143#
170144#
170225B
170386#
170145#
170146#
170602#
170235
170556#
170797#
170654#
170533#
170537#
170536#
170709#
170538#
170406#
170506#
170147#
170542#
170551#
170540#
170236
170771#
170346#
170558#
170798#
170531
170426#
170447#
170272#
Community Name
OKAWVILLE, VILLAGE OF
OLD MILL CREEK, VILLAGE OF
OLMSTED, VILLAGE OF
OLNEY, CITY OF
OLYMPIA FIELDS, VILLAGE OF
OMAHA, VILLAGE OF
ONARGA, VILLAGE OF
OQUAWKA, VILLAGE OF
ORANGEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
OREGON, CITY OF
ORLAND HILLS, VILLAGE OF
FORMERLY VILLAGE OF WESTHAVEN
ORLAND PARK, VILLAGE OF
OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF
OTTAWA, CITY OF
PALATINE, VILLAGE OF
PALESTINE, VILLAGE OF
PALOS HEIGHTS, CITY OF
PALOS HILLS, CITY OF
PALOS PARK, VILLAGE OF
PARIS, CITY OF
PARK CITY, CITY OF
PARK FOREST, VILLAGE OF
PARK RIDGE, CITY OF
PAWNEE, VILLAGE OF
PAXTON, CITY OF
PEARL, VILLAGE OF
PECATONICA, VILLAGE OF
PEKIN, CITY OF
PEORIA COUNTY *
PEORIA HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
PEORIA, CITY OF
PEOTONE, VILLAGE OF
PERRY COUNTY *
PERU, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PHOENIX, VILLAGE OF
PIATT COUNTY*
PIKE COUNTY*
PINCKNEYVILLE, CITY OF
PIPER CITY, VILLAGE OF
PLAINFIELD, VILLAGE OF
PLANO, CITY OF
PLEASANT HILL, VILLAGE OF
PLEASANT PLAINS, VILLAGE OF
POLO, CITY OF
PONTIAC, CITY OF
PONTOON BEACH, VILLAGE OF
PONTOOSUC, VILLAGE OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
EDGAR COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
PIATT COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/87(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/15/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/01/83(R)
10/25/96
10/15/81(R)
03/15/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
02/16/73(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/31/79(R)
05/03/82(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/16/81(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
11/01/79(R)
02/01/80(R)
01/14/83(R)
09/13/96
08/19/85(R)
09/18/86(R)
06/01/95(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/16/82(R)
10/25/82(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/30/76(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/30/76(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/30/93(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/87(M)
09/07/00
06/15/83
09/04/85(M)
1 1/06/00
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/01/83
03/26/76
10/15/81
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
06/01/82
09/04/85
1 1/06/00
09/04/85
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
08/19/85(M)
09/07/00
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
09/05/84
12/01/81
06/04/80
06/01/83
11/01/79
02/01/80
09/06/95
08/01/80
08/19/85
09/18/86
1 1/06/00
09/01/86(L)
01/03/86
09/16/82
(NSFHA)
09/06/95
1 1/26/82
10/15/85
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
07/05/83
02/05/82
10/18/83
Page 12 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170592#
170148#
170799B
170578#
170975#
170014B
170692C
170919#
170562#
170567#
170993#
170003#
170575#
170668B
170031
170593#
170883
170484#
170149#
170249B
170151#
170152#
170150#
170153#
170603#
170387#
170727C
170154#
170180B
170532#
170840#
170694A
170582#
175171#
170723#
170773#
170155#
170711
170724#
170216#
170156#
170677B
170276#
170389#
170390#
170391#
170388#
Community Name
PORT BYRON, VILLAGE OF
POSEN, VILLAGE OF
POTOMAC, VILLAGE OF
PRAIRIE DU ROCHER, VILLAGE OF
PRAIRIE GROVE, VILLAGE OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PROPHETSTOWN, CITY OF
PROSPECT HEIGHTS, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY *
PULASKI, VILLAGE OF
PUTNAM COUNTY *
QUINCY, CITY OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY *
RANKIN, VILLAGE OF
RANTOUL, VILLAGE OF
RAPIDS CITY, VILLAGE OF
REYNOLDS, VILLAGE OF
RICHMOND, VILLAGE OF
RICHTON PARK, VILLAGE OF
RIDGWAY, VILLAGE OF
RIVER FOREST, CITY OF
RIVER GROVE, VILLAGE OF
RIVERDALE, VILLAGE OF
RIVERSIDE, VILLAGE OF
RIVERTON, VILLAGE OF
RIVERWOODS, VILLAGE OF
ROANOKE, VILLAGE OF
ROBBINS, VILLAGE OF
ROBINSON, CITY OF
ROCHELLE, CITY OF
ROCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
ROCK FALLS, CITY OF
ROCK ISLAND COUNTY*
ROCK ISLAND, CITY OF
ROCKFORD, CITY OF
ROCKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
ROLLING MEADOWS, CITY OF
ROMEO VILLE, VILLAGE OF
ROSCOE, VILLAGE OF
ROSELLE, VILLAGE OF
ROSEMONT, VILLAGE OF
ROSEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ROSICLARE, CITY OF
ROUND LAKE BEACH, VILLAGE OF
ROUND LAKE HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
ROUND LAKE PARK, VILLAGE OF
ROUND LAKE, VILLAGE OF
County
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
OGLE COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/02/8 1(R)
02/27/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
10/26/92
09/04/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/18/85(R)
11/15/84(R)
11/15/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/08/94(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/24/98
07/16/81(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/18/85(R)
08/11/78(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/16/80(R)
12/01/81(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/04/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/06/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/02/82(R)
06/09/72(R)
12/04/79(R)
11/16/83(R)
10/17/78(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
03/01/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
11/15/79(R)
02/27/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
08/01/80(R)
01/02/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/02/81
1 1/06/00
09/18/85(M)
09/04/85
09/07/79
09/04/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
1 1/06/00
03/18/85
11/15/84
11/15/84
10/15/81
06/03/86
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
04/18/75
07/16/81
11/06/00
07/18/85(M)
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
12/01/81
09/07/00
09/04/87(M)
11/06/00
04/06/84(M)
04/01/82
06/15/82
09/01/86(L)
12/18/86
02/04/87
06/18/82
11/16/83
11/06/00
09/22/99
03/01/82
05/19/81
11/06/00
02/27/84(M)
09/15/83
09/07/00
09/03/97
09/07/00
09/07/00
Page 13 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170448#
170519B
170454#
170188B
170912#
170635#
170157#
170158#
170159#
170605#
170905#
170881A
170407#
170868
170189#
170802#
170969#
171043
170712#
170033#
170595
171000#
17033 1#
170776
170892B
170161#
170725#
170162#
170332#
170163#
170449#
171013#
170459#
170579B
170887#
170485#
170015B
170604#
170330#
170616#
170032#
170634#
170820#
171012#
170613A
170434#
170713#
170639#
Community Name
ROXANA, VILLAGE OF
S. JACKSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SANDWICH, CITY OF
SANGAMON COUNTY *
SAUGET, VILLAGE OF
SAUK VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
SCHAUMBURG, VILLAGE OF
SCHILLER PARK, VILLAGE OF
SCHUYLER COUNTY *
SCOTT COUNTY*
SEATON, VILLAGE OF
SENECA, VILLAGE OF
SESSER, CITY OF
SHABBONA, VILLAGE OF
SHERIDAN, VILLAGE OF
SHERMAN, VILLAGE OF
SHILOH, VILLAGE OF
USE THE ST. CLAIR COUNTY [170616] FIRM
SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF
SIDNEY, VILLAGE OF
SILVIS, CITY OF
SKOKIE, VILLAGE OF
SLEEPY HOLLOW, VILLAGE OF
SMITHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SMITHTON, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH BARRINGTON, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH BELOIT, CITY OF
SOUTH CHICAGO HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH ELGIN, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH HOLLAND, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH ROXANA, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH WILMINGTON, VILLAGE OF
SPARLAND, VILLAGE OF
SPARTA, CITY OF
SPRING BAY, VILLAGE OF
SPRING GROVE, VILLAGE OF
SPRING VALLEY, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. CHARLES, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR COUNTY *
ST. JOSEPH, VILLAGE OF
ST. LIBORY, VILLAGE OF
ST. MARIE, VILLAGE OF
STANDARD, VILLAGE OF
STARK COUNTY *
STAUNTON, CITY OF
STEGER, VILLAGE OF
STEPHENSON COUNTY *
County
MADISON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
ROCK ISLAND
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
MACOUPIN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/79(R)
08/04/87(R)
05/01/79(R)
02/27/84(R)
01/06/83(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/05/81(R)
02/15/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/18/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/10/79(R)
11/16/83(R)
02/29/96(R)
11/01/79(R)
01/17/86(R)
09/19/83(R)
02/14/79(R)
06/15/82(R)
03/18/85(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/16/81(R)
01/02/80(R)
05/02/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
03/04/88(R)
09/30/83(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/02/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/15/81(R)
11/16/83(R)
02/25/83(R)
08/03/89(R)
03/01/87(R)
12/21/84(R)
07/17/81(R)
02/18/83(R)
02/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/01/79
08/04/87(M)
05/01/79
02/27/84(M)
01/06/83
07/09/82
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
11/06/00
07/18/85
01/03/86
08/19/85(M)
04/16/97
(NSFHA)
09/21/00
08/10/79(M)
11/16/83
09/06/95
01/17/86
(NSFHA)
11/06/00
06/15/82
(NSFHA)
06/25/76(M)
1 1/06/00
05/01/84
1 1/06/00
07/16/81
11/06/00
1 1/26/82
03/04/88
09/30/83
08/24/84(M)
06/04/80
11/04/81
09/18/85(M)
02/02/82
09/02/81
08/05/85
11/16/83
02/25/83(M)
08/03/89
03/01/87(L)
12/21/84(M)
07/17/81(M)
11/06/00
07/30/82
Page 14 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170693B
170420#
170164#
170165#
170037#
170166#
170408#
170421#
170333#
170524B
170636#
170167#
170412#
171015#
170637#
170191#
170714#
170803
170005B
170038#
170815#
17023 IB
170913#
170804#
170006#
170392#
170168#
170169#
170016A
170460B
170779B
170504#
170393#
170195#
170568B
170656#
170487#
170708#
170035#
170870A
170559#
170780#
170233#
170450#
170935#
170394#
170264
170353
170319#
Community Name
STERLING, CITY OF
STEWARD, VILLAGE OF
STICKNEY, VILLAGE OF
STONE PARK, VILLAGE OF
STONINGTON, VILLAGE OF
STREAMWOOD, VILLAGE OF
STREATOR, CITY OF
SUBLETTE, VILLAGE OF
SUGAR GROVE, VILLAGE OF
SULLIVAN, CITY OF
SUMMERFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SUMMIT, VILLAGE OF
SUMNER, CITY OF
SUN RIVER TERRACE, VILLAGE OF
SWANSEA, VILLAGE OF
SYCAMORE, CITY OF
SYMERTON, VILLAGE OF
TALLULA, VILLAGE OF
TAMMS, VILLAGE OF
TAYLORVILLE, CITY OF
TAZEWELL COUNTY *
TEUTOPOLIS, VILLAGE OF
THAWVILLE, VILLAGE OF
THAYER, VILLAGE OF
THEBES, VILLAGE OF
THIRD LAKE, VILLAGE OF
THORNTON, VILLAGE OF
TINLEY PARK, CITY OF
TISKILWA, VILLAGE OF
TOLUCA, CITY OF
TOULON,CITY OF
TOWANDA, VILLAGE OF
TOWER LAKES, VILLAGE OF
TUSCOLA, CITY OF
ULLIN, VILLAGE OF
UNION COUNTY*
UNION, VILLAGE OF
UNIVERSITY PARK, VILLAGE OF
FORMERLY THE VILLAGE OF PARK FOREST SOUTH
FORMERLY THE VILLAGE OF PARK FOREST SOUTH
URBANA, CITY OF
VALIER, VILLAGE OF
VALLEY CITY, VILLAGE OF
VALMEYER, VILLAGE OF
VANDALIA, CITY OF
VENICE, CITY OF
VERMILION COUNTY
VERNON HILLS, VILLAGE OF
VERONA, VILLAGE OF
VICTORIA, VILLAGE OF
VIENNA, CITY OF
County
WHITESIDE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MOULTRIE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
KANKAKEE COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/05/84(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/11/83(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/10/79(R)
05/01/94(R)
07/16/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
01/05/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
05/25/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/03/82(R)
04/03/84(R)
02/01/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/18/87(R)
09/04/87(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
04/01/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/19/86(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/02/87(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/04/87(R)
01/05/78(R)
06/01/95(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
10/31/83(R)
07/18/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/05/84(M)
04/15/88
1 1/06/00
1 1/06/00
09/28/79(M)
1 1/06/00
09/18/86
(NSFHA)
03/04/88
09/18/85(M)
09/28/84
1 1/06/00
07/16/84
04/16/97
12/01/81
09/21/00
09/06/95
(NSFHA)
05/25/84(M)
09/18/85(M)
08/01/80
08/19/85(M)
09/30/88
05/03/82
04/03/84
09/07/00
11/06/00
1 1/06/00
08/19/85(M)
06/04/87(M)
06/18/87(M)
02/09/01
09/03/97
04/01/82
09/27/85(M)
02/19/86
08/15/83
11/06/00
01/16/81
07/02/87(M)
08/01/83
09/04/85
08/16/88(M)
01/05/78
06/01/95(L)
09/07/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/18/83
Page 15 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170196#
170217#
170435
171042#
170395#
170017#
170673#
170218#
170273#
170728B
170655#
170512B
170297#
170396#
170397#
170865#
170462#
170219#
170872
170335#
170239#
171034
170170
170171#
170220#
170671B
170221#
170173#
170906#
170687#
170695#
170934#
171041
170174#
170222#
170175#
170715#
170223#
170720#
170176#
170644#
170398#
171075
170976#
170224#
17045 1#
170730#
Community Name
VILLA GROVE, CITY OF
VILLA PARK, VILLAGE OF
VIRDEN, CITY OF
VOLO, VILLAGE OF
WADSWORTH, VILLAGE OF
WALNUT, VILLAGE OF
WARREN COUNTY *
WARRENVILLE, CITY OF
WARSAW, CITY OF
WASHBURN, VILLAGE OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WATERLOO, CITY OF
WATSEKA, CITY OF
WAUCONDA, VILLAGE OF
WAUKEGAN, CITY OF
WAYNE, VILLAGE OF
WENONA, CITY OF
WEST CHICAGO, CITY OF
WEST CITY, VILLAGE OF
WEST DUNDEE, VILLAGE OF
WEST FRANKFORT, CITY OF
WEST PEORIA, CITY OF
Use Peoria County 's [CID 170533] FIRM panel number
0175-B and FIS dated 6-1-83.
WESTCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
WESTERN SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
WESTMONT, VILLAGE OF
WESTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WHEATON, CITY OF
WHEELING, VILLAGE OF
WHITE COUNTY *
WHITESIDE COUNTY*
WILL COUNTY *
WILLIAMSON COUNTY *
WILLIAMSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WILLOW SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
WILLOWBROOK, VILLAGE OF
WILMETTE, VILLAGE OF
WILMINGTON, CITY OF
WINFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WINNEBAGO COUNTY *
WINNETKA, VILLAGE OF
WINSLOW, VILLAGE OF
WINTHROP HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
WITT, CITY OF
WONDER LAKE, VILLAGE OF
FORMERLY THE VILLAGE OF SUNRISE RIDGE
WOOD DALE, CITY OF
WOOD RIVER, CITY OF
WOODFORD COUNTY *
County
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MACOUPIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
IROQUOIS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
DUPAGE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/01/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/03/98(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/15/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/84(R)
07/02/87(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
10/03/94(R)
12/02/88(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/01/81(R)
05/16/83(R)
09/29/94(R)
06/04/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
04/03/85(R)
02/19/86(R)
04/15/82(R)
04/29/93
09/14/95
07/16/79(R)
01/16/80(R)
01/14/83(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/15/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
11/19/80(R)
11/17/82(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/15/98
08/15/83(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/01/79(R)
02/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/01/79
02/04/81
(NSFHA)
09/07/00
09/07/00
03/15/84
05/25/84(M)
10/18/83
06/01/84
07/02/87(M)
02/05/86
09/24/84(M)
09/30/88
09/07/00
09/07/00
12/01/81
12/02/88
08/19/87
(NSFHA)
06/01/84
05/16/83
11/06/00
11/06/00
01/16/81
08/19/85(M)
06/15/79
1 1/06/00
04/03/85
02/19/86
1 1/06/00
08/17/79
11/06/00
09/30/83
1 1/06/00
09/06/95
10/18/83
05/21/01
1 1/06/00
11/17/82
09/03/97
08/15/83
08/19/97
05/01/79
02/01/84
Page 16 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
170819#
170737#
170488#
170825
170177
170615A
170347#
170240B
170399#
Community Name
WOODLAND, VILLAGE OF
WOODRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
WOODSTOCK, CITY OF
WORDEN, VILLAGE OF
WORTH, VILLAGE OF
WYOMING, CITY OF
YORKVILLE, CITY OF
ZEIGLER, CITY OF
ZION, CITY OF
County
IROQUOIS COUNTY
DU PAGE COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/88(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/08/84(R)
07/07/78(R)
07/11/97
06/01/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/88
06/15/79
06/11/82
(NSFHA)
07/07/78
03/10/78
06/01/82
08/05/85(M)
09/07/00
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 780
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 743
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 50
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 133
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 37
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 25
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 17 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
170835
17081 1#
170941A
170844
170657A
170942A
170415#
170923A
170742A
170845
170945A
170920#
171008#
170746
170783B
170977#
170850
170471B
170785A
170842
170898#
170986#
170493#
171014#
170751 A
170948A
170648B
170658A
170950A
170985#
170227#
170849#
170244#
170952#
170232#
170991#
170827
170953#
170283A
170234A
170885
170300#
170910#
170561
171002#
170570
Community Name
**ILLINOIS
ADELINE, VILLAGE OF
ALEXANDER COUNTY*
ALTONA, VILLAGE OF
ALVIN, VILLAGE OF
ANNA, CITY OF
ARGENTA, VILLAGE OF
ASHTON, VILLAGE OF
AVISTON, VILLAGE OF
AVON, VILLAGE OF
BELGIUM, VILLAGE OF
BIGGSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BLUFORD, VILLAGE OF
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BRYANT, VILLAGE OF
BUCKNER, VILLAGE OF
BULL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
BUREAU JUNCTION, VILLAGE OF
BUSHNELL, CITY OF
CAMARGO, VILLAGE OF
CEDARVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CLAY COUNTY
COLES COUNTY *
COLFAX, VILLAGE OF
DAMIANSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
DE SOTO, VILLAGE OF
DEER GROVE, VILLAGE OF
DELAVAN, CITY OF
DONGOLA, VILLAGE OF
EARLVILLE, CITY OF
EDGAR COUNTY *
EFFINGHAM COUNTY *
EL WOOD, VILLAGE OF
EQUALITY, VILLAGE OF
FARMINGTON ,CITY OF
FAYETTE COUNTY
FORD COUNTY *
FOREST CITY, VILLAGE OF
FREEMANSPUR, VILLAGE OF
GALVA, CITY OF
GIBSON CITY, CITY OF
GOLDEN GATE, VILLAGE OF
GRAND TOWER, CITY OF
HAMILTON COUNTY *
HAMLETSBURG, VILLAGE OF
HARDIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN, VILLAGE OF
County
OGLE COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
MCDONOUGH
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
COLES COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WHITESIDE COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
EDGAR COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/11/75
01/03/86(F)
09/29/78
02/21/75
03/29/74
01/12/79
04/30/86(F)
05/20/77
10/18/74
03/28/75
09/29/78
07/22/77
07/10/81
12/06/74
08/19/85(F)
01/25/80
03/28/75
06/07/74
04/05/74
04/11/75
05/29/81
08/05/85(F)
02/09/0 1(F)
12/04/84
04/05/74
10/06/78
09/04/85(F)
03/08/74
10/13/78
03/02/79
12/23/77
11/03/82(F)
09/04/85(F)
10/20/78
01/06/78
02/23/79
03/28/75
10/20/78
06/14/74
03/29/74
06/27/75
05/16/83(F)
02/01/90(F)
02/22/74
12/01/83(F)
11/19/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/11/76
07/15/88(8)
09/29/79
02/21/76
03/29/75
01/12/80
09/04/91(8)
05/20/78
10/18/75
03/28/76
09/29/79
07/22/78
07/10/82
12/06/75
08/19/85(8)
01/25/81
03/28/76
06/07/75
04/05/75
04/11/76
05/29/82
07/17/80
02/12/01(8)
12/04/85
04/05/75
10/06/79
09/04/85(8)
03/08/75
10/13/79
03/02/80
12/23/78
09/30/92(8)
09/04/85(8)
10/20/79
01/06/79
02/23/80
03/28/76
10/20/79
06/14/75
03/29/75
06/27/76
06/17/91(8)
01/17/00(8)
02/22/75
12/19/81
11/19/77
Page 18 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
171033#
170957A
170990#
170826
170457A
170458
170409#
171023#
171016#
170959#
170765
170836
170932#
170960A
170961#
170685A
171029#
170611 A
170609#
170853A
170769
170515B
170135#
170832
170831
170247#
170352A
170964A
170642#
170904#
170995#
170710#
170774#
170966A
170800#
170988#
170021#
171074#
170933#
170775
170801A
170580
170778A
170670B
170828
170972A
170973A
171024#
170024A
170938#
170455#
Community Name
HIGHWOOD, CITY OF
INDIANOLA, VILLAGE OF
JASPER COUNTY *
JUNCTION CITY, VILLAGE OF
LACON, CITY OF
LAROSE, VILLAGE OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LILY LAKE, VILLAGE OF
LONG CREEK. CITY OF
MACKINAW, VILLAGE OF
MAEYSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
MAPLETON, VILLAGE OF
MARION COUNTY *
MECHANICSBURG, VILLAGE OF
MENOMINEE, VILLAGE OF
MILL SHOALS, VILLAGE OF
MONEE, VILLAGE OF
MOWEAQUA, VILLAGE OF
NAPLES, VILLAGE OF
NEW BEDFORD, VILLAGE OF
NEWMAN, CITY OF
NOKOMIS, CITY OF
NORTH RIVERSIDE, VILLAGE OF
OAKFORD, VILLAGE OF
OAKWOOD HILLS, VILLAGE OF
OLD SHAWNEETOWN, VILLAGE OF
ONEIDA, CITY OF
PALMER, VILLAGE OF
PEARL CITY, VILLAGE OF
POPE COUNTY *
RICHLAND COUNTY *
ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF
ROCKTON, VILLAGE OF
ROSSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
RUSSELLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SALINE COUNTY *
SAVANNA, CITY OF
SAYBROOK, VILLAGE OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
ST. DAVID, VILLAGE OF
ST. FRANCISVILLE, VILLAGE OF
STEELEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
THOMSON, VILLAGE OF
TILTON, VILLAGE OF
TOPEKA, TOWN OF
TROY GROVE, VILLAGE OF
VERGENNES, VILLAGE OF
VIRGIL, VILLAGE OF
VIRGINIA, CITY OF
WABASH COUNTY *
WAMAC, CITY OF
County
LAKE COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
PEORIA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
SANGAMON COUNTY
JO DAVIESS COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
BUREAU COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
STEPHENSON
COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
WILL COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
VERMILION COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
LA SALLE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
09/03/97(F)
01/05/79
01/17/85(F)
03/21/75
11/30/73
10/25/74
02/01/85(F)
06/16/92(F)
08/04/87(F)
11/10/78
10/31/75
03/28/75
03/24/78
01/26/79
01/12/79
07/19/74
09/06/95(F)
06/07/74
05/17/82(F)
06/27/75
11/29/74
08/19/87(F)
12/16/80(F)
03/21/75
04/18/75
09/04/85(F)
06/07/74
10/13/78
09/29/89(F)
12/01/83(F)
06/08/79
09/15/83(F)
10/15/81(F)
09/08/78
01/17/85(F)
06/01/79
06/04/80(F)
02/09/0 1(F)
02/24/78
12/06/74
03/29/74
07/30/76
10/17/75
08/19/85(F)
03/21/75
01/26/79
02/16/79
06/02/92(F)
09/01/86(F)
02/15/85(F)
03/04/88(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/03/98
01/05/80
07/27/80
03/21/76
11/30/74
10/25/75
1 1/24/79
06/16/93
09/08/79
11/10/79
10/31/76
03/28/76
03/24/79
01/26/80
01/12/80
07/19/75
09/06/96
06/07/75
12/18/95(W)
06/27/76
11/29/75
08/19/87(8)
01/12/01(8)
03/21/76
04/18/76
07/03/90(8)
06/07/75
10/13/79
09/29/89(8)
08/15/83(8)
06/08/80
09/06/95(8)
10/15/81(8)
09/08/79
03/22/75
06/01/80
1 1/20/86(W)
02/09/02
02/24/79
12/06/75
03/29/75
07/30/77
10/17/76
06/21/75
03/21/76
01/26/80
02/16/80
06/02/93
09/01/86(8)
1 1/03/79
06/28/75
Page 19 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
County
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
170997# WASHINGTON COUNTY *
170638# WASHINGTON PARK, VILLAGE OF
170354# WATAGA, VILLAGE OF
170974A WATSON, VILLAGE OF
171003# WAYNE COUNTY
170304B WHEELER, VILLAGE OF
170355A WILLIAMSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
EFFINGHAM COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
12/26/80
06/15/79(F)
09/04/85(F)
02/02/79
01/09/81
07/18/85(F)
06/14/74
12/26/81
08/03/98(8)
09/04/85(8)
02/02/80
01/09/82
01/02/91(W)
06/14/75
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 1
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 18
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 3
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 99
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 99
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 20 of 20
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180424#
180314#
180184
180149#
180302#
180031#
180045B
180303#
180150#
180097#
180244B
180496#
180489
180065
180046#
185172#
180233
180520
180214
180112
180006#
180252#
180148#
180485
185173A
180478#
180169#
180289#
180011#
180273#
180511
180163#
180060#
180180#
180402#
180105#
180512
180069#
185174#
180087#
180317#
180318
180207A
180047C
180281#
180196#
180081#
Communities
Community Name
"INDIANA
ADAMS COUNTY *
ALBANY, TOWN OF
ALBION, CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF
ALLEN COUNTY *
ALTON, TOWN OF
ALTONA, TOWN OF
AMBOY, TOWN OF
ANDERSON, CITY OF
ANDREWS, TOWN OF
ANGOLA, CITY OF
ARCADIA, TOWN OF
ARGOS, TOWN OF
ATTICA, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AUSTIN, TOWN OF
AVON, TOWN OF
BAINBRIDGE, TOWN OF
BARGERSVILLE, TOWN OF
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY *
BATTLE GROUND, TOWN OF
BEDFORD, CITY OF
BERNE, CITY OF
BEVERLY SHORES, TOWN OF
BLACKFORD COUNTY*
BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF
BLUFFTON, CITY OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BOONVILLE, CITY OF
BRAZIL, CITY OF
BREMEN, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, TOWN OF
BROOK, TOWN OF
BROOKLYN, TOWN OF
BROOKSBURG, TOWN OF
BROOKSTON, TOWN OF
BROOKVILLE, TOWN OF
BROWN COUNTY*
BROWNSBURG, TOWN OF
BROWNSTOWN, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON,TOWN OF
BURNS HARBOR, TOWN OF
BUTLER, CITY OF
CAMBRIDGE CITY, TOWN OF
CANNELTON, CITY OF
CARMEL, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
ADAMS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
DEARBORN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
HENDRICKS
PUTNAM COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BARTHOLOMEW
COUNTY
TIPPECANOE
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
BLACKFORD COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
WARRICK COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
HENDRICKS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/03/81(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/28/90(R)
03/19/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
12/09/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/01/88(R)
07/18/83(R)
04/06/73(R)
09/01/88(R)
11/17/00
01/03/85(R)
07/21/78(R)
03/15/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/04/87(R)
1 0/09/8 1(R)
03/23/73(R)
11/01/94(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/16/82(R)
06/25/82(R)
05/12/95(R)
10/15/81(R)
04/16/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/01/83(R)
09/07/95
11/15/84(R)
04/13/73(R)
04/17/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
08/04/88(R)
08/19/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
07/18/83(R)
05/19/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/81
06/15/79
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
03/02/98
08/01/83
08/19/85(M)
08/19/86
02/16/94
09/30/82
06/17/86(M)
08/16/88(M)
(NSFHA)
09/01/88(L)
04/03/87
03/26/82
09/01/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/15/82
01/02/81
09/04/87
(NSFHA)
10/17/75
11/01/94(L)
06/17/91
07/18/83
04/06/98
05/17/82
10/15/81
04/03/85
09/01/86(L)
09/17/80
12/01/83
1 1/02/95
01/03/86
04/01/80
09/06/96
(NSFHA)
06/01/81
08/19/85(M)
10/15/81
07/18/83
05/19/81
Page lof 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180019#
180222#
180022#
180304#
180127#
180297
180274#
180025#
180151#
180201#
180299
180320#
180426#
180026#
180247
180029#
180259A
180215B
180300B
180007#
180061B
180086#
180066
180416B
180472#
180171B
180378
180128#
180384#
180510#
180260
180088#
180321
180486
180044#
180038#
180430#
180001#
180322#
180051#
180020B
180100
180323
180205#
180106A
180129#
180130#
Community Name
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF CLAY
CARROLL COUNTY *
CARTHAGE, TOWN OF
CASS COUNTY *
CEDAR GROVE, TOWN OF
CEDAR LAKE, TOWN OF
CHALMERS, TOWN OF
CHANDLER, TOWN OF
CHARLESTOWN, CITY OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWN OF
CHESTERTON, TOWN OF
CHURUBUSCO, TOWN OF
CICERO, TOWN OF
INCLUDES TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON
CLARK COUNTY *
CLARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CLEAR LAKE, TOWN OF
CLINTON COUNTY *
CLINTON, CITY OF
CLOVERDALE, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA CITY, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
CONNERSVILLE, CITY OF
CORYDON, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
CRANDALL, TOWN OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY*
CRAWFORDSVILLE, CITY OF
CROTHERSVILLE, TOWN OF
CROWN POINT, CITY OF
CULVER, TOWN OF
CUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
USE THE HANCOCK COUNTY [180419] FIRM
DANA, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DARLINGTON, TOWN OF
DAYTON, TOWN OF
DE KALB COUNTY *
DEARBORN COUNTY *
DECATUR COUNTY *
DECATUR, CITY OF
DECKER, TOWN OF
DELAWARE COUNTY*
DELPHI, CITY OF
DEMOTTE, TOWN OF
DENVER, TOWN OF
DUNE ACRES, TOWN OF
DUPONT, TOWN OF
DYER, TOWN OF
EAST CHICAGO, CITY OF
County
CARROLL COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
WARRICK COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
VERMILLION
COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
BARTHOLOMEW
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
VERMILLION
COUNTY
HENDRICKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
TIPPECANOE
COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
DEARBORN COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/15/89(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
01/02/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/03/81(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/01/88(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
01/05/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
08/01/95(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/01/88(R)
12/07/84(R)
01/17/86(R)
02/01/94(R)
01/03/85(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/02/80(R)
03/10/93(R)
06/11/76(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
02/12/82(R)
01/05/89(R)
09/16/82(R)
11/16/83(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
1 1/09/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/01/95(R)
09/01/76(R)
03/16/88(R)
04/24/8 1(R)
11/01/95(R)
05/15/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/15/89
1 1/02/83
08/03/81
11/02/95
03/15/82
(NSFHA)
09/28/79(M)
1 1/05/86
05/01/80
03/15/84
(NSFHA)
01/02/80
02/18/83
08/03/81
(NSFHA)
09/01/88(L)
07/01/87(L)
06/17/86(M)
01/05/79(M)
02/19/97
08/01/95(L)
07/18/83
09/01/88(L)
12/07/84(M)
01/17/86
02/01/94(L)
(NSFHA)
02/12/82
05/02/80(M)
(NSFHA)
11/15/79
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/05/89
09/16/82
11/16/83
07/02/81
09/16/82(M)
12/03/87
08/01/95(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/24/8 1(M)
11/01/95(L)
10/02/97
06/04/80
Page 2 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180052#
180113#
180324#
180056#
180057#
180170C
180036#
180152#
180032#
180257#
180074B
180390A
180417#
180484#
180423#
180021B
180432#
180003#
180282#
180064#
180008
180030
180068#
180114#
180154#
180277B
180187A
180070#
180356
180048
180132#
180075#
180002#
180394A
180063#
180181
180058#
180499#
180238#
180435#
180216
180040#
180084#
180283#
180043#
180513
180115#
180305
185175#
180284#
180080#
Community Name
EATON, TOWN OF
EDINBURGH, CITY OF
EDWARDSPORT, TOWN OF
ELKHART COUNTY *
ELKHART, CITY OF
ELLETSVILLE, TOWN OF
ELNORA, TOWN OF
EL WOOD, CITY OF
ENGLISH, CITY OF
EVANSVILLE, CITY OF
FAIRMOUNT, TOWN OF
FARMLAND, TOWN OF
FAYETTE COUNTY *
FERDINAND, TOWN OF
FISHERS, TOWN OF
FLORA, TOWN OF
FLOYD COUNTY *
FORT WAYNE, CITY OF
FOUNTAIN CITY, CITY OF
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
FOWLER, TOWN OF
FRANKFORT, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FRANKTON, TOWN OF
FREDERICKSBURG,TOWN OF
FRENCH LICK, TOWN OF
FULTON COUNTY *
GALVESTON, TOWN OF
GARRETT, CITY OF
GARY, CITY OF
GAS CITY, CITY OF
GENEVA, TOWN OF
GENTRYVILLE, TOWN OF
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GOODLAND, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, CITY OF
GRABILL, TOWN OF
GRANDVIEW, TOWN OF
GRANT COUNTY*
GREENCASTLE, CITY OF
GREENDALE, TOWN OF
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
GREENS FORK, TOWN OF
GREENSBURG, CITY OF
GREENTOWN, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRIFFIN, TOWN OF
GRIFFITH, TOWN OF
HAGERSTOWN, TOWN OF
HAMILTON COUNTY*
County
DELAWARE COUNTY
BARTHOLOMEW
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VANDERBURGH
COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
DUBOIS COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
DEARBORN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
POSEY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/04/89(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
01/03/86(R)
10/15/81(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/01/88(R)
03/22/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
11/01/95(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/03/85(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
12/21/78
01/03/85(R)
06/11/76(R)
09/01/88(R)
04/01/81(R)
05/05/81(R)
09/04/85(R)
10/21/76
07/03/85(R)
1 1/08/78(R)
02/11/76(R)
03/16/81(R)
07/05/83(R)
11/01/84(R)
09/16/88(R)
03/28/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/01/79(R)
10/17/90(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/17/86(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/16/82(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/30/83(R)
09/14/95
05/17/82(R)
02/11/76(R)
04/14/72(R)
10/15/81(R)
12/16/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/79
01/02/87
05/04/89
06/05/85
06/01/85
10/04/94
08/19/86(M)
05/19/81
01/03/86
10/15/81
07/03/85(M)
07/03/85(M)
09/01/88(L)
08/05/85
02/19/87
11/01/95(L)
01/02/81
02/16/95
11/04/81
1 1/04/77
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/02/95
04/01/81
05/05/81
09/04/85(M)
07/09/76
07/03/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
07/05/83
11/01/84
09/16/88(M)
03/28/80
(NSFHA)
08/01/79
02/16/95
07/18/83
06/17/86(M)
(NSFHA)
09/16/82
02/04/87
11/04/81
09/30/83
11/18/88
(NSFHA)
10/15/82
10/15/81
01/16/87
Page 3 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180248C
180241A
180134#
180419#
180326
180085#
180009#
180387#
180415#
180437#
185176#
180328
180136#
180414#
180249
180005#
180362#
180438#
180094#
180225#
180159#
180155
180405#
180439#
180055#
180440#
180104#
180027#
180108#
180111#
180076#
180354
180185#
180182B
180422#
180242B
180093#
180121#
180267#
180144#
180490#
180253#
180125#
180268#
180126#
180131#
180226
180420C
180306#
Community Name
HAMILTON, TOWN OF
HAMLET, TOWN OF
HAMMOND, CITY OF
HANCOCK COUNTY *
HANOVER, TOWN OF
HARRISON COUNTY *
HARTFORD CITY, CITY OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
HENDRICKS COUNTY *
HENRY COUNTY*
HIGHLAND, TOWN OF
HILLSBORO, TOWN OF
HOBART, CITY OF
HOWARD COUNTY *
HUDSON, CITY OF
HUNTERTOWN, TOWN OF
HUNTINGBURG, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON COUNTY *
HUNTINGTON, CITY OF
INDIAN VILLAGE, TOWN OF
INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITIES OF BEECH GROVE,
LAWRENCE, SOUTHPORT AND THE TOWN OF
SPEEDWAY
INGALLS, TOWN OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JASPER COUNTY *
JASPER, CITY OF
JAY COUNTY*
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JEFFERSONVILLE, CITY OF
JENNINGS COUNTY *
JOHNSON COUNTY *
JONESBORO, TOWN OF
JONESVILLE, TOWN OF
KENDALLVILLE, CITY OF
KENTLAND, TOWN OF
KNOX COUNTY *
KNOX, CITY OF
KOKOMO, CITY OF
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY*
LA FONTAINE, TOWN OF
LA PORTE COUNTY*
LA PORTE, CITY OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAGRANGE COUNTY
LAGRO,TOWN OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE STATION, CITY OF
LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF
LANESVILLE, TOWN OF
LAUREL, TOWN OF
County
STEUBEN COUNTY
STARKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BLACKFORD COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
HENDRICKS COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
DUBOIS COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
DUBOIS COUNTY
JAY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
JENNINGS COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
BARTHOLOMEW
COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
STARKE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
LA PORTE COUNTY
LA PORTE COUNTY
TIPPECANOE
COUNTY
LAGRANGE COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/15/82(R)
09/30/76(R)
11/01/95(R)
12/01/82(R)
1 0/09/8 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/26/92(R)
05/19/72(R)
06/08/84(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
11/15/85(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
09/16/88(R)
07/18/83(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/11/81(R)
05/15/84(R)
07/15/88(R)
01/05/84(R)
07/01/94(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/09/96
10/01/92(R)
08/01/79(R)
11/01/95(R)
03/02/89(R)
08/01/83(R)
05/25/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/15/85(R)
02/01/94(R)
08/03/81(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/17/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
04/01/93(R)
11/19/80(R)
02/01/94(R)
06/18/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/30/76(R)
01/04/85(R)
09/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/86(M)
09/01/86(L)
03/16/81
10/15/82
(NSFHA)
11/01/95(L)
12/01/82
1 0/09/8 1(M)
03/16/81
09/04/87
12/15/83
(NSFHA)
12/04/79
07/16/81
(NSFHA)
03/02/98
10/06/98
07/18/83
07/18/83
09/30/87
01/05/01
(NSFHA)
01/05/84
07/01/94(L)
06/01/82
01/06/78
10/01/92(L)
07/16/90
11/01/95(L)
03/02/89
08/01/83
(NSFHA)
01/06/83
09/18/85(M)
02/15/85
02/01/94(L)
08/03/81
02/04/87
11/19/97
06/04/96
06/04/96
11/19/80
02/01/94(L)
11/19/97
09/02/81
09/05/79
(NSFHA)
01/04/85(M)
11/02/95
Page 4 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180441#
180041#
180035#
180013#
180518#
180091#
180186#
180456#
180023#
185177A
180165A
180137#
180442#
180107B
180033#
180412#
180457
180443#
180479#
180177#
180329
180403#
180330
180098#
180138#
180409#
180505
180147#
180460#
180331#
180382#
180034#
180285#
180227#
180383
180295
180444#
180498#
180333
180194
180445#
180294
180501#
180334#
180176#
180178
Community Name
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LAWRENCEBURG, CITY OF
LEAVENWORTH, TOWN OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEO-CEDARVILLE, TOWN OF
Town is located on panel number 160 of the Allen County
FIRM
LEWISVILLE, TOWN OF
LIGONIER, CITY OF
LINTON, CITY OF
LOGANSPORT, CITY OF
LONG BEACH, TOWN OF
LOOGOOTEE, CITY OF
LOWELL, TOWN OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, CITY OF
MARENGO, TOWN OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARKLE, TOWN OF
USE THE WELLS COUNTY [#180228] FIRM.
USE THE WELLS COUNTY [#180228] FIRM.
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARTIN COUNTY*
MARTINSVILLE, CITY OF
MATTHEWS, CITY OF
MAUCKPORT, TOWN OF
MECCA, TOWN OF
MEDORA, TOWN OF
on probation eff. : 1 1/20/98
MERRILLVILLE, TOWN OF
MIAMI COUNTY *
MICHIANA SHORES, CITY OF
MICHIGAN CITY, CITY OF
MIDDLEBURY, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
MILFORD JUNCTION, VILLAGE OF
MILLTOWN, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
MISHAWAKA, CITY OF
MITCHELL, CITY OF
MONON, TOWN OF
MONROE COUNTY*
MONROEVILLE, TOWN OF
MONTEREY, TOWN OF
MONTEZUMA,TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MONTPELIER, CITY OF
USE THE BLACKFORD COUNTY [180478] FHBM.
MOORESVILLE, TOWN OF
MORGAN COUNTY *
MORGANTOWN, TOWN OF
County
LAWRENCE COUNTY
DEARBORN COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
LA PORTE COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
PARKE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
LA PORTE COUNTY
LA PORTE COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PARKE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
BLACKFORD COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/94(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/01/83(R)
05/03/82(R)
02/09/00(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/06/83(R)
03/19/90(R)
07/16/81(R)
03/23/73(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/01/94(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/16/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
1 1/07/9 1(R)
01/05/89(R)
07/01/91(R)
12/04/79(R)
11/15/85(R)
07/05/83(R)
04/01/88(R)
01/05/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/19/86(R)
11/12/91(R)
08/17/81(R)
08/17/83(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/14/88(R)
10/15/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/17/81(R)
11/15/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/01/88(R)
10/17/90(R)
04/15/88(R)
04/01/88(R)
06/01/98(R)
05/25/78(R)
11/08/91
09/05/79(R)
06/01/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/94(L)
09/16/82
08/01/83
03/17/97
03/02/98
09/04/87
01/06/83
03/19/90(M)
07/16/81
11/21/75
09/01/86(L)
10/18/83
02/01/94(L)
09/30/77
09/16/82
12/01/82
(NSFHA)
01/05/89
07/01/91(L)
12/04/79
(NSFHA)
07/05/83
04/01/88(L)
01/05/84
10/15/81
08/19/86
(NSFHA)
08/17/81
08/15/83
09/04/87
02/04/87
10/15/85
10/15/81
02/17/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/02/95
02/16/95
(NSFHA)
04/01/88(L)
06/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
11/02/83
06/01/81
(NSFHA)
Page 5 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180393
180389#
180508#
180358
180053#
180139#
180059#
180018#
180062#
180308#
180092#
180140#
180210A
180004#
180519
180464#
180116#
180276#
180262#
180179#
180183#
180082#
180228B
180269#
180109
180465#
180206B
180406B
180509#
180229
180290
180481#
180189A
180192#
180391
180309#
180156#
180195#
180168#
180199#
180473#
180089#
180359
180164B
180291
180202#
180425#
Community Name
MORRISTOWN, TOWN OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MT. CARMEL, TOWN OF
MULBERRY, TOWN OF
MUNCIE, CITY OF
MUNSTER, TOWN OF
NAPPANEE, CITY OF
NASHVILLE, TOWN OF
NEW ALBANY, CITY OF
NEW AMSTERDAM, TOWN OF
NEW CASTLE, CITY OF
NEW CHICAGO, TOWN OF
NEW HARMONY, TOWN OF
NEW HAVEN, CITY OF
NEW POINT, TOWN OF
The town of New Point has no SFHA identified. Currently, it's
not included in the unincorporated Decatur County, FIRM.
NEW PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF
ALSO KNOWN AS THE TOWN OF BORDEN
NEW WHITELAND, TOWN OF
NEWBURGH, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NEWTON COUNTY*
NOBLE COUNTY *
NOBLESVILLE, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE TWONSHIPS OF DEAWARE,
NOBLESVILLE AND FALL CREEK
NORTH LIBERTY, TOWN OF
NORTH MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
NORTH VERNON, CITY OF
NORTH WEBSTER, TOWN OF
OGDEN DUNES, TOWN OF
OHIO COUNTY*
OLDENBURG, TOWN OF
OSCEOLA, TOWN OF
OSSIAN, TOWN OF
OWEN COUNTY*
PAOLI, TOWN OF
PARKE COUNTY *
PARKER CITY, TOWN OF
PATRIOT, TOWN OF
on probation eff.:06/30/99
PENDLETON, TOWN OF
PERRY COUNTY *
PERU, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PIKE COUNTY *
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
PLAINVILLE, TOWN OF
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
PONETO, TOWN OF
PORTAGE, CITY OF
PORTER COUNTY *
County
SHELBY COUNTY
POSEY COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ELKHART COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
POSEY COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WARRICK COUNTY
VERMILLION
COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
JENNINGS COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PARKE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
SWITZERLAND
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
HENDRICKS COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/21/78(R)
01/18/84(R)
02/29/96(R)
03/18/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/16/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
01/24/76(R)
12/17/76(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/18/83(R)
05/16/00
12/17/90
08/16/82(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/03/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
03/24/94(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/04/87(R)
02/29/96(R)
12/14/92(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/01/93(R)
11/14/79
09/30/98
01/03/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/03/82(R)
11/01/95(R)
01/18/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/27/97
03/01/79(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/15/77(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
01/18/84
1 1/02/95
(NSFHA)
12/03/87
05/16/83
08/15/83
06/18/87
09/21/00
07/05/83
09/04/87
01/02/80
07/01/87(L)
02/16/95
04/18/80
08/16/82
05/17/82
06/15/81
09/01/86(L)
01/03/79
09/24/82
08/19/85(M)
11/19/97
(NSFHA)
02/04/87
08/05/86(M)
09/04/87(M)
11/02/95
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/01/93(L)
10/31/75
04/14/78
(NSFHA)
12/04/79
05/03/82
11/01/95(L)
03/02/98
08/01/87(L)
06/15/79
03/01/79
(NSFHA)
09/15/77
(NSFHA)
06/01/82
04/01/82
Page 6 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180208#
185178A
180209A
180117#
180073#
180482#
180213#
180429#
180101B
180102B
180287#
180341B
180221#
180407#
180217
180270
180096#
180071
180239#
180385#
185179#
180421#
180223#
180427#
180279#
180142#
180143#
180474#
180234#
180310
180028#
180099#
180502
180235#
180236#
180231#
180301B
180237#
180191#
180494#
180286#
180346#
180347#
180049
180141#
180224#
180399#
180240#
180243#
180157
180503#
Community Name
PORTER, TOWN OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POSEY COUNTY*
PRINCES LAKE, TOWN OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY*
PUTNAM COUNTY*
RANDOLPH COUNTY*
REMINGTON, TOWN OF
RENSSELAER, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RIDGEVILLE, TOWN OF
RIPLEY COUNTY*
RISING SUN, CITY OF
ROACHDALE, TOWN OF
ROANN, TOWN OF
ROANOKE, TOWN OF
ROCHESTER, CITY OF
ROCKPORT, CITY OF
ROME CITY, TOWN OF
ROSELAND, TOWN OF
RUSH COUNTY *
RUSHVILLE, CITY OF
RUSSIA VILLE, TOWN OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SCHERERVILLE, TOWN OF
SCHNEIDER, TOWN OF
SCOTT COUNTY *
SCOTTSBURG, CITY OF
SEELYVILLE, TOWN OF
SELLERSBURG, TOWN OF
SEYMOUR, CITY OF
SHAMROCK LAKES, TOWN OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
SHELBYVILLE, CITY OF
SOUTH BEND, CITY OF
SOUTH WHITLEY, TOWN OF
SPENCER COUNTY *
SPENCER, TOWN OF
SPICELAND, TOWN OF
SPRING GROVE, TOWN OF
SPRING LAKE, TOWN OF
SPRINGPORT, TOWN OF
ST. JOE, TOWN OF
ST. JOHN, TOWN OF
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY*
ST. PAUL, TOWN OF
STARKE COUNTY*
STEUBEN COUNTY*
SUMMITVILLE, TOWN OF
SWEETSER, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF SWEETSER HAS ADOPTED THE GRANT
COUNTY [#180435] FIRM.
County
PORTER COUNTY
JAY COUNTY
POSEY COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RIPLEY COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
VIGO COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BLACKFORD COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
STARKE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/04/80(R)
05/12/72(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
01/21/83(R)
04/01/88(R)
10/01/92(R)
05/01/87(R)
11/01/95(R)
02/01/94(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
10/18/83(R)
01/03/85(R)
05/04/88(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/18/83(R)
10/15/82(R)
05/04/73(R)
12/01/82(R)
11/03/82(R)
06/01/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
11/01/95(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
07/22/93(R)
10/15/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
02/01/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/01/89(R)
05/11/95(R)
09/02/82(R)
09/03/85(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/03/85(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
01/17/85(R)
04/01/93(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/21/78(R)
1 1/07/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/04/80
11/07/75
01/01/87(L)
09/16/81
01/21/83(M)
04/01/88(L)
10/01/92(L)
05/01/87(L)
11/01/95(L)
02/01/94(L)
08/16/82
07/18/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
10/18/83
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/01/82
(NSFHA)
07/18/83
10/15/82
01/05/89
12/01/82
11/03/82
06/01/79(M)
08/15/78
05/01/80
08/01/80
11/01/95(L)
09/20/96
(NSFHA)
08/01/80
08/16/96
(NSFHA)
10/15/82
04/01/82
02/17/88
08/19/85(M)
05/01/78
09/01/89(L)
09/04/87(M)
09/02/82
04/03/84
09/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
06/11/82
02/17/88
01/17/85
04/01/93(L)
07/03/86
(NSFHA)
Page 7 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
180251#
180122#
180197B
180264#
180014
180428#
180475#
180255#
180198#
180219B
18041 1#
180292
180504#
180487#
180204#
180469#
180256#
180293
180449#
180110#
180352#
180263#
180120#
180266#
180271#
180232#
180024
180095#
180418#
180123#
180037
180446#
180050#
180174
180280#
180175A
180288#
180190A
180042#
180254#
180083#
180517
180447#
Community Name
SWITZERLAND COUNTY *
SYRACUSE, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF TURKEY CREEK
TELL CITY, CITY OF
TERRE HAUTE, CITY OF
THORNTON, TOWN OF
TIPPECANOE COUNTY *
TIPTON COUNTY *
TIPTON, CITY OF
TROY, TOWN OF
UNION CITY, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY*
UNIONDALE, TOWN OF
UPLAND, TOWN OF
USE THE GRANT COUNTY [#180435] FIRM.
UTICA, TOWN OF
VALPARAISO, CITY OF
VAN BUREN, TOWN OF
USE THE GRANT COUNTY [#180435] FIRM.
VANDERBURGH COUNTY *
VERA CRUZ, TOWN OF
VERMILLION COUNTY *
VERNON, TOWN OF
VEVAY, TOWN OF
VIGO COUNTY *
VINCENNES, CITY OF
WABASH COUNTY*
WABASH, CITY OF
WALKERTON, TOWN OF
WALTON, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WARRICK COUNTY *
WARSAW, CITY OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WASHINTON COUNTY*
WATERLOO, TOWN OF
WAVELAND, TOWN OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WAYNETOWN, TOWN OF
WELLS COUNTY *
WEST BADEN SPRINGS, TOWN OF
WEST HARRISON, TOWN OF
WEST LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
WESTFIELD, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
WHITE COUNTY *
County
SWITZERLAND
COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
VIGO COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
TIPPECANOE
COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
VANDERBURGH
COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
VERMILLION
COUNTY
JENNINGS COUNTY
SWITZERLAND
COUNTY
VIGO COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
WABASH COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HUNTINGTON
COUNTY
WARRICK COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
DEARBORN COUNTY
TIPPECANOE
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/16/80(R)
02/04/87(R)
03/01/77(R)
12/01/81(R)
07/21/78(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/01/88(R)
03/05/96(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/29/86(R)
04/01/88(R)
05/25/78(R)
1 1/07/9 1(R)
02/12/82(R)
03/02/79(R)
1 1/07/9 1(R)
02/01/80(R)
04/01/88(R)
11/01/95(R)
10/18/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
01/18/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
11/08/78(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/17/82(R)
02/04/87(R)
08/08/79(R)
07/30/96
09/04/85(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/02/82(R)
02/09/00
06/01/83(R)
05/07/76
01/17/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/24/00
09/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/16/80
02/04/87
03/01/77
12/01/81
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
09/10/88(L)
03/05/96
07/05/83
09/29/86(M)
04/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
09/19/84
01/06/83(M)
08/05/91
04/01/88(L)
11/01/95(L)
10/18/83
12/04/79
1 1/02/83
12/18/84
11/19/97
11/19/97
04/15/81
(NSFHA)
09/30/82
02/03/93
02/04/87
(NSFHA)
04/21/78
02/02/89
(NSFHA)
09/02/82
04/09/76
06/01/83
06/11/76
01/17/85
01/02/81
03/11/83
09/01/88(L)
Page 8 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY
180118# WHITELAND, TOWN OF
180015 WHITESTOWN, TOWN OF
180313# WHITING, CITY OF
180298# WHITLEY COUNTY*
180212B WINAMAC, TOWN OF
180220B WINCHESTER, CITY OF
180515# WINFIELD, TOWN OF
USE THE LAKE COUNTY (180126 ) FIRM DATED 9/2/81.
180124# WINONA LAKE, TOWN OF
180296 WOLCOTT, TOWN OF
180500# WOODBURN, CITY OF
180079A WORTHINGTON, TOWN OF
180361 # YORKTOWN, TOWN OF
180016# ZIONSVILLE, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
JOHNSON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
394
378
58
85
16
10
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
09/16/81(R)
04/05/88(R)
03/06/81(R)
04/01/88(R)
12/01/92(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/14/97(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
10/17/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/16/81
(NSFHA)
03/06/81(M)
04/01/88(L)
12/01/92(L)
09/04/85(M)
02/04/87
(NSFHA)
02/16/95
09/01/86(L)
09/16/81
12/15/81
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 9 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
180477#
180258#
180408#
180497#
180433#
180054#
180493#
180366
180434#
180436#
180327A
180193A
180090#
180172A
180459#
180491#
180462B
180463#
180337A
180480#
180250A
180340A
180388
180345A
180410#
180349#
180350A
180514#
180067A
180448#
180272
180200A
180495
180471 A
Community Name
"INDIANA
BENTON COUNTY*
CAYUGA, TOWN OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CONVERSE, TOWN OF
DAVIESS COUNTY *
DUBOIS COUNTY *
DUNREITH, TOWN OF
FRANCISO, TOWN OF
GIBSON COUNTY *
GREENE COUNTY *
HAZLETON, TOWN OF
JUDSON, TOWN OF
KNIGHTOWN, TOWN OF
LADOGA, TOWN OF
MENTONE, TOWN OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
NAPOLEON, TOWN OF
NEW PEKIN, TOWN OF
NEWBERRY, TOWN OF
ORANGE COUNTY*
ORLAND, TOWN OF
PATOKA, TOWN OF
PINES, TOWN OF
SALAMONIA, TOWN OF
SULLIVAN COUNTY*
SULPHUR SPRINGS, TOWN OF
TENNYSON, TOWN OF
ULEN, TOWN OF
VEEDERSBURG,TOWN OF
WARREN COUNTY *
WILLIAMSPORT, TOWN OF
WINSLOW,TOWN OF
WOODLAWN HEIGHT, TOWN OF
WOODLAWN, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
BENTON COUNTY
VERMILLION
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
DUBOIS COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
PARKE COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
RIPLEY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
PORTER COUNTY
JAY COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
WARRICK COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
FOUNTAIN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
0
3
0
Hazard Area
Identified
01/02/81
06/1 5/8 1(F)
11/25/77
04/05/88(F)
05/05/78
12/13/74
09/04/87(F)
03/21/75
04/28/78
07/21/78
11/23/73
12/17/73
09/04/87(F)
12/26/75(F)
07/17/79
01/17/85(F)
09/21/79
03/09/79
01/25/74
05/29/81
05/31/74
11/23/73
03/21/75
10/22/76
03/23/79
09/04/87(F)
02/01/74
09/16/82(F)
06/01/87(F)
11/10/78
09/01/88(F)
06/01/87(F)
09/04/87(F)
01/26/79
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/02/82
05/31/75
11/25/78
04/05/89
05/05/79
12/13/75
09/04/88
03/21/76
04/28/79
07/21/79
11/23/74
12/17/74
1 1/30/74
05/24/75
07/17/80
01/17/86
09/21/80
03/09/80
01/25/75
05/29/82
05/31/75
11/23/74
03/21/76
10/22/77
03/23/80
02/01/75
02/01/75
11/29/75
06/01/87(8)
11/10/79
09/01/88(8)
06/01/87(8)
09/04/88
01/26/80
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 30
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 30
Page 10 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 11 of 11 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190537
190103#
190539
190525A
190223#
190541
190692A
190138B
190180#
190065A
190508A
190546
190254#
190174B
190048B
190226#
190286B
190694
190035A
190696A
190211
190049#
19001 1#
190549A
190233#
190550A
190528A
190423#
190452A
190263B
190015B
190158#
190051A
190240#
190273#
190535#
190266B
190707A
190846#
190555
190420A
190328
190920A
190847#
190287A
Communities
Community Name
"IOWA
ADAIR, CITY OF
ADEL, CITY OF
AGENCY, CITY OF
AINSWORTH, CITY OF
AKRON, CITY OF
ALBIA, CITY OF
ALBURNETT, CITY OF
ALDEN, CITY OF
ALGONA, CITY OF
ALTA- VISTA, CITY OF
ALTON, CITY OF
ALTOONA, CITY OF
AMES, CITY OF
ANAMOSA, CITY OF
ANITA, CITY OF
ANKENY, CITY OF
ANTHON, CITY OF
ARCADIA, TOWN OF
AREDALE, CITY OF
ARTHUR, CITY OF
ATALISSA, CITY OF
ATLANTIC, CITY OF
AUDUBON, CITY OF
AURELIA, CITY OF
AVOCA, CITY OF
BANCROFT, CITY OF
BARNUM, CITY OF
BATTLE CREEK, CITY OF
BEACON, CITY OF
BEDFORD, CITY OF
BELLE PLAINE, CITY OF
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BENNETT, CITY OF
BETTENDORF, CITY OF
BEVINGTON, CITY OF
BLACK HAWK COUNTY *
BONAPARTE, CITY OF
BONDURANT, CITY OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BOONE, CITY OF
BRADGATE, CITY OF
BRANDON, CITY OF
BRAYTON, CITY OF
BREMER COUNTY *
BRONSON, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
ADAIR COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
IDA COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
AUDUBON COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
IDA COUNTY
MAHASKA COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
AUDUBON COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/10/80(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/30/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/10/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/96(R)
06/01/83(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
11/10/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/19/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/16/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/10/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/30/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
07/01/87(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/01/96(R)
02/09/99(R)
03/01/01(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
10/15/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/01/78(R)
05/01/87(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/02/90(R)
09/01/96(R)
10/07/93(R)
09/01/96(R)
09/15/93
08/19/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
06/06/0 1(L)
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
09/01/96(L)
06/01/83
08/01/86(L)
08/05/85(L)
(NSFHA)
06/16/95
08/19/87(M)
06/17/86
12/06/99
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86
05/17/89
07/01/87(L)
12/16/80
09/01/87(L)
09/01/96(L)
02/08/99
03/01/01(L)
07/03/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
10/15/82
09/04/85(M)
02/04/98
1 1/20/98
11/17/82
07/02/87
04/02/90(M)
09/01/96(L)
(NSFHA)
09/01/96(L)
10/29/76
08/19/85(M)
07/16/90
09/01/86(L)
Page 1 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190848#
190093
190241#
190114#
190850#
190712A
190086#
190274#
190039#
190041#
190234B
190492A
190117#
190134A
190852#
190050B
190017#
190187#
190433
190439#
190009B
190188#
190853#
190195A
190128A
190087A
190094A
190261#
190063#
190395
190219#
190336#
190858#
190072#
190059#
190201A
190374A
190859B
190088#
190488#
190514A
190189#
190163A
190307#
190042B
190169#
190002B
190288#
Community Name
BUCHANAN COUNTY*
BUCK GROVE, CITY OF
BUFFALO, CITY OF
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
BUTLER COUNTY *
CALUMET, CITY OF
CAMANCHE, CITY OF
CARLISLE, CITY OF
CARROLL COUNTY*
CARROLL, CITY OF
CARSON, CITY OF
CARTER LAKE, CITY OF
CASCADE, CITY OF
CASEY, CITY OF
CASS COUNTY*
CEDAR COUNTY*
CEDAR FALLS, CITY OF
CEDAR RAPIDS, CITY OF
CENTER JUNCTION, CITY OF
CENTER POINT, CITY OF
CENTER VILLE,CITY OF
CENTRAL CITY, CITY OF
CERRO GORDO COUNTY *
CHARITON, CITY OF
CHARLES CITY, CITY OF
CHARLOTTE, CITY OF
CHARTER OAK, CITY OF
CHELSEA, CITY OF
CHEROKEE, CITY OF
CHURDAN, CITY OF
CLARINDA, CITY OF
CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF
CLAYTON COUNTY *
CLAYTON, CITY OF
CLEAR LAKE, CITY OF
CLEMONS, CITY OF
CLERMONT, CITY OF
CLINTON COUNTY *
CLINTON, CITY OF
CLIVE, CITY OF
CLUTIER, CITY OF
COGGON, CITY OF
COLFAX, CITY OF
COLUMBUS JUNCTION, CITY OF
COON RAPIDS, CITY OF
CORALVILLE, CITY OF
CORNING, CITY OF
CORRECTIONVILLE, CITY OF
County
BUCHANAN COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
DBS MOINES COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
O'BRIEN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
AD AIR COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
APPANOOSE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/91(R)
11/01/99
09/17/80(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
07/05/94
09/01/87(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
10/02/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/08/78(R)
04/02/79(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
12/15/82(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/02/87(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/29/99
02/01/87(R)
02/02/77(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/86(R)
12/16/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
12/27/93
07/02/8 1(R)
09/06/89(R)
05/01/90(R)
03/16/89(R)
08/04/87(R)
04/01/92(R)
03/01/86(R)
09/01/90(R)
09/17/80(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/16/84(R)
06/01/87(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
04/30/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/15/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/21/99
11/29/74
09/17/80
04/17/85
11/06/00
09/01/87(L)
12/18/84
11/20/98
06/17/86(M)
03/19/90
09/04/85(M)
08/08/78(M)
10/16/92
02/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
08/05/85(M)
02/01/85
03/18/91
(NSFHA)
07/05/82
07/02/87(M)
12/15/82
06/07/77
02/01/87(L)
02/02/77
09/04/85(M)
04/30/86(M)
12/16/80
01/02/81
08/29/75
07/02/81
09/06/89
07/16/96
03/16/89
08/04/87
04/01/92(L)
03/01/86(L)
09/01/90(L)
09/14/82
10/16/92
08/19/85(M)
07/16/84
06/01/87(L)
02/06/91
04/30/86(M)
09/29/78
08/01/86(L)
08/15/90
Page 2 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190407A
190235#
190091#
190723#
190264#
190946#
190289B
190421A
190860#
190242#
190565A
190043A
190246A
190566
190095B
190096#
190026#
190113#
190227#
190359#
190568B
190864#
190402A
190505A
190097A
190534#
195180#
190036B
190363A
190018#
190144B
190119#
190922B
Community Name
COR WITH, CITY OF
COUNCIL BLUFFS, CITY OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY*
CRESCENT, CITY OF
CRESTON, CITY OF
GUMMING, CITY OF
GUSHING, CITY OF
DAKOTA CITY, CITY OF
DALLAS COUNTY *
DAVENPORT, CITY OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DEDHAM, CITY OF
DEFIANCE, CITY OF
DELHI, CITY OF
DELOIT, CITY OF
DENISON, CITY OF
DENVER, CITY OF
DBS MOINES COUNTY
DBS MOINES, CITY OF
DESOTO, CITY OF
DEWITT, CITY OF
THE CITY OF DEWITT HAS ADOPTED THE CLINTON
COUNTY (190859) FIRM DATED 9-1-90 PANEL 0013,
0029 FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND
INSURANCE PURPOSES.
DICKINSON COUNTY *
DIKE, CITY OF
DONAHUE, CITY OF
DOW CITY, CITY OF
DUBUQUE COUNTY *
DUBUQUE, CITY OF
DUMONT, CITY OF
DUNDEE, CITY OF
DUNKERTON, CITY OF
DUNLAP, CITY OF
DURANGO, CITY OF
DURANT, CITY OF
County
HANCOCK COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
DBS MOINES COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/91(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/01/99(R)
04/04/83(R)
01/24/00(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/01/96(R)
05/01/94(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/01/96(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
12/17/99
08/01/86(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/20/93(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
10/27/95(R)
09/01/96(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/01/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/83(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/11/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/91(L)
02/04/87
09/01/86(L)
06/01/82
04/04/83
11/20/98
09/18/85(M)
09/01/96(L)
01/19/00
02/04/98
09/01/96(L)
09/01/86(L)
08/19/86(M)
03/19/76
08/01/86(L)
05/17/82
07/16/90
02/17/82
07/15/88
01/19/00
04/20/00
08/19/86(M)
05/01/90(L)
09/01/86(L)
09/01/83
09/06/89
08/01/86(L)
08/01/86(L)
01/16/80
09/18/85(M)
07/16/81
USE THE CEDAR COUNTY [190050] FIRM
USE THE CEDAR COUNTY [190050] FIRM
USE THE CEDAR COUNTY [190050] FIRM
190120#
190928
190570A
190247A
190450A
190270A
190271A
190139A
DYERSVILLE, CITY OF
EAGLE GROVE, CITY OF
EARLHAM, CITY OF
EARLING, CITY OF
EAST PERU, CITY OF
EDDYVILLE, CITY OF
ELDON, CITY OF
ELDORA, CITY OF
DELAWARE COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MAHASKA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
12/01/77(R)
05/26/98
09/30/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/02/95
(NSFHA)
09/30/88(M)
09/01/86(L)
02/01/87(L)
08/01/87(L)
05/01/87(L)
05/01/87(L)
Page 3 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190574A
190125#
190019#
190073#
190074A
190209#
190136A
190440#
190202#
190221#
190865#
190576
190124#
190020#
190356
190013B
190329A
190190#
190168#
190075A
190267B
190730A
190866#
190376A
190437A
190127
190382
190283#
195181A
190184#
190066B
190027#
190308#
190868#
190212
190424A
190076B
190515A
190447A
190256A
190021B
190516A
190203#
190044
190104#
190737
190318B
190739
190869#
Community Name
ELDRIDGE, CITY OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELK RUN HEIGHTS, CITY OF
ELKADER, CITY OF
ELKPORT, CITY OF
ELLIOTT, CITY OF
ELLSWORTH, CITY OF
ELY, CITY OF
EMERSON, CITY OF
EMMETSBURG, CITY OF
EMMETT COUNTY*
EPWORTH, CITY OF
ESTHERVILLE, CITY OF
EVANSDALE, CITY OF
EVERLY, CITY OF
EXIRA, CITY OF
FAIRBANK, CITY OF
FAIRFAX, CITY OF
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
FARMERSBURG, CITY OF
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FARNHAMVILLE, CITY OF
FAYETTE COUNTY *
FAYETTE, CITY OF
FENTON, TOWN OF
FLOYD COUNTY*
FLOYD, CITY OF
FOREST CITY, CITY OF
FORT DODGE, CITY OF
FORT MADISON, CITY OF
FREDERICKSBURG, CITY OF
FREDERIKA, CITY OF
FREDONIA, CITY OF
FREMONT COUNTY *
FRUITLAND, CITY OF
GALVA, CITY OF
GARBER, CITY OF
GARWIN, CITY OF
GEORGE, CITY OF
GILBERT,CITY OF
GILBERTVILLE, CITY OF
GLADBROOK, CITY OF
GLENWOOD, CITY OF
GLIDDEN, CITY OF
GRANGER, CITY OF
GRANVILLE, CITY OF
GRAY, CITY OF
GREELEY, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY *
County
SCOTT COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
PALO ALTO COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
AUDUBON COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
IDA COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
AUDUBON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/91(R)
08/04/87(R)
08/01/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/17/89(R)
08/01/87(R)
02/17/93(R)
04/03/84(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
07/12/77(R)
10/14/77(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
1 1/30/79(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/19/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/16/87(R)
07/01/91(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/01/97(R)
12/01/97(R)
11/10/99
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/07/90(R)
06/04/93(R)
03/01/90(R)
06/10/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/10/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/25/80(R)
01/10/97
06/10/80(R)
09/01/96(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/91(L)
08/19/91
08/01/83
07/16/96
08/01/86(L)
05/17/89
08/01/87(L)
02/17/93
12/17/87
09/30/93
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
10/14/77
04/16/93
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
08/19/86(M)
09/19/84
09/30/94
08/19/86(M)
07/16/87(M)
07/01/91(L)
07/01/91(L)
09/01/87(L)
07/01/97(L)
12/01/97(L)
03/19/76
04/16/93
01/02/76
05/03/82
09/29/86(M)
07/16/90
02/06/91
03/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/19/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
01/01/87(L)
08/01/78(M)
09/04/85(M)
11/17/82
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
07/19/77
(NSFHA)
09/01/96(L)
Page 4 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190037#
190228#
190346#
190135#
190871#
190077#
190133#
190131#
190873#
190248#
190316A
190143#
190590
190204#
190252#
190441#
190170#
190224B
190404A
190364A
190291A
190510A
190022#
190155#
190156#
190391
19003 1#
190275#
190171#
190140A
190249#
190879#
190023#
190880#
190396A
190600A
190882#
190745#
190919#
190164A
190883#
190185#
190268#
190014#
190477A
190250#
190098A
190339A
190603
190884#
Community Name
GREENE, CITY OF
GRIMES, CITY OF
GRISWOLD, CITY OF
GUTHRIE CENTER, CITY OF
GUTHRIE COUNTY *
GUTTENBERG, CITY OF
HAMBURG, CITY OF
HAMPTON, CITY OF
HANCOCK COUNTY*
HARLAN, CITY OF
HARPERS FERRY, CITY OF
HARRISON COUNTY
HARTLEY, CITY OF
HASTINGS, CITY OF
HAWARDEN, CITY OF
HIAWATHA, CITY OF
HILLS, CITY OF
HINTON, CITY OF
HOLLAND, CITY OF
HOPKINTON, CITY OF
HORNICK, CITY OF
HOSPERS, CITY OF
HUDSON, CITY OF
HUMBOLDT, CITY OF
IDA GROVE, CITY OF
IMOGENE, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
INDIANOLA, CITY OF
IOWA CITY, CITY OF
IOWA FALLS, CITY OF
IRWIN, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE CITY OF GREEN ISLAND
JANESVILLE, CITY OF
JASPER COUNTY*
JEFFERSON, CITY OF
JEWELL, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY*
JOHNSTON, CITY OF
JONES COUNTY *
KELLOGG, CITY OF
KEOKUK COUNTY *
KEOKUK, CITY OF
KEOSAUQUA, CITY OF
KIMBALLTON,CITY OF
KINGSLEY, CITY OF
KIRKMAN, CITY OF
KIRON, CITY OF
KNIERIM, CITY OF
KNOXVILLE, CITY OF
KOSSUTH COUNTY *
County
BUTLER COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
O'BRIEN COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
IDA COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
KEOKUK COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
AUDUBON COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/82(R)
11/06/85(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/96(R)
03/04/80(R)
08/04/88(R)
05/01/79(R)
06/16/95
04/04/83(R)
07/01/97(R)
01/14/98
06/10/80(R)
10/14/82(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/03/82(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/17/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/16/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/05/79(R)
12/03/98
05/16/77(R)
07/31/79(R)
05/02/77(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/01/90(R)
07/16/90(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/01/01(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/26/00
03/01/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/17/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/01/87(R)
12/16/77(R)
05/01/92(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/82
04/30/86
05/18/92
06/01/87(L)
09/01/96(L)
09/05/84
08/04/88
05/01/79
09/06/77
04/04/83
07/01/97(L)
08/09/00
(NSFHA)
09/16/82
01/16/81
02/03/82
08/16/88
09/27/85(M)
07/17/86(M)
07/02/87(M)
09/27/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
01/16/80
05/19/81
09/05/79
10/29/76
10/18/88
11/20/98
06/05/85
08/01/87(L)
07/16/81
06/16/95
07/16/90
01/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
03/01/01(L)
07/16/87
07/19/00
09/30/88(M)
06/01/87(L)
08/23/77
03/01/78
09/05/79
06/18/87
09/27/85(M)
05/17/82
08/01/86(L)
05/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/01/92(L)
Page 5 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190309#
190752#
190367A
190503#
190110A
190605
190389#
190067B
190292A
190243#
190225#
190182#
190310A
190529#
190111B
190198B
190311#
190347
190417A
190829#
190032B
190607
190145A
190078B
190146B
190609
190193#
190054B
190196A
190887#
190325
190888#
190205#
190112#
190099B
190046A
190160B
190157#
190889A
190191#
195182C
190890#
190200#
190524#
190060#
190365B
190257#
190377A
195183A
190458
190465A
190478A
Community Name
LA PORTE CITY, CITY OF
LACONA, CITY OF
LAKE PARK, CITY OF
LAKE VIEW, CITY OF
LAMONI, CITY OF
LARCHWOOD, CITY OF
LATIMER, CITY OF
LAWLER, CITY OF
LAWTON, CITY OF
LE CLAIRE, CITY OF
LE MARS, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY *
LEHIGH, CITY OF
LELAND, CITY OF
LEON, CITY OF
LESTER, CITY OF
LETTS, CITY OF
LEWIS, CITY OF
LIME SPRINGS, TOWN OF
LINN COUNTY *
LINN GROVE, CITY OF
LISBON, CITY OF
LITTLE SIOUX, CITY OF
LITTLEPORT,CITY OF
LOGAN, CITY OF
LOHRVILLE, CITY OF
LOUISA COUNTY *
LOWDEN, CITY OF
LUCAS, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY*
MADRID, CITY OF
MAHASKA COUNTY *
MALVERN, CITY OF
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MANILLA, CITY OF
MANNING, CITY OF
MAQUOKETA, CITY OF
MARENGO, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY *
MARION, CITY OF
MARQUETTE, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARSHALLTOWN, CITY OF
MARTENSDALE, CITY OF
MASON CITY, CITY OF
MASONVILLE, CITY OF
MAXWELL, CITY OF
MAYNARD, CITY OF
MC GREGOR, CITY OF
MC INTIRE, CITY OF
MELROSE, CITY OF
MERRILL, CITY OF
County
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
BUENA VISTA
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
MAHASKA COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/04/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/30/80(R)
05/01/94(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/01/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/02/93(R)
08/26/77(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/15/82(R)
03/01/97(R)
06/10/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/04/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/15/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/01/96(R)
06/10/80(R)
03/01/97(R)
09/16/82(R)
10/15/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/16/80(R)
02/21/97
07/05/82(R)
01/19/72(R)
09/19/97
04/17/84(R)
09/01/96(R)
12/02/80(R)
07/01/97(R)
02/15/84(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/19/72(R)
12/08/00
07/02/87(R)
1 1/06/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/02/81
1 1/20/98
09/01/87(L)
06/04/80
05/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/01/94(L)
08/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
08/15/80
05/01/78
06/15/81
09/04/85(M)
01/02/81
08/04/88
09/04/86(M)
02/06/91
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
12/15/82
03/01/97(L)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
08/04/87(M)
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/06/91
08/19/85(M)
08/16/88
09/01/96(L)
(NSFHA)
03/01/97(L)
09/16/82
10/15/82
06/03/86(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/05/86(M)
01/07/98
10/18/77
07/05/82
10/03/75
06/03/77
04/17/84
1 1/20/98
03/16/95
07/01/97(L)
02/15/84
08/01/86(L)
10/17/75
09/26/75
07/02/87(M)
1 1/06/9 1(M)
Page 6 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190891#
190081A
190781#
190147#
190892#
190149
190622
190175#
190782
190186#
190783
190784A
190623A
190192
190293A
190836#
190213#
190010A
190068#
190493#
190258#
190942#
190069C
190038#
190121#
190628#
190214#
190384A
190630#
190302A
19063 1#
190632A
190237#
190313#
190633A
190126#
190176A
190272#
190177B
190172B
190206#
190898#
190442#
190251#
190506#
190397A
190451 A
190105#
190150A
190326A
190151A
Community Name
MILLS COUNTY *
MILLVILLE, CITY OF
MINDEN, CITY OF
MISSOURI VALLEY, CITY OF
MITCHELL COUNTY *
MONDAMIN, CITY OF
MONTEZUMA, CITY OF
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MONTOUR, CITY OF
FHBMNo. HOI
MONTROSE, CITY OF
MOORHEAD,CITY OF
MOORLAND, CITY OF
MORAVIA, CITY OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MOVILLE, CITY OF
MUSCATINE COUNTY*
MUSCATINE, CITY OF
MYSTIC, CITY OF
NASHUA, CITY OF
NEOLA, CITY OF
NEVADA, CITY OF
NEW ALBIN, CITY OF
NEW HAMPTON, CITY OF
NEW HARTFORD, CITY OF
NEW VIENNA, CITY OF
NEWTON, CITY OF
NICHOLS, CITY OF
NORA SPRINGS, CITY OF
NORTH LIBERTY, CITY OF
NORTHWOOD, CITY OF
NORWALK, CITY OF
NORWAY, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
OAKVILLE, CITY OF
ODEBOLT, CITY OF
OELWEIN, CITY OF
OLIN, CITY OF
OTTUMWA, CITY OF
OXFORD JUNCTION, CITY OF
OXFORD, CITY OF
PACIFIC JUNCTION, CITY OF
PALO ALTO COUNTY*
PALO, CITY OF
PANAMA, CITY OF
PANORAMA PARK, CITY OF
PATON, CITY OF
PATTERSON,CITY OF
PERRY, CITY OF
PERSIA, CITY OF
PILOT MOUND, CITY OF
PISGAH, CITY OF
County
MILLS COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
APPANOOSE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
APPANOOSE COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
PALO ALTO COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/14/82(R)
07/02/87(R)
12/07/88(R)
08/01/77(R)
03/01/00(R)
06/10/80(R)
06/01/88(R)
04/02/79(R)
04/25/01
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/17/87(R)
09/01/96(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/10/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
10/17/86(R)
01/05/78(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/17/90(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
10/18/83(R)
04/25/80(R)
10/17/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
11/05/86(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/03/93
03/01/97(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/04/88(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/01/96(R)
11/17/82(R)
08/26/80(R)
12/17/90(R)
09/01/96(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/01/91(R)
03/01/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/89
07/02/87(M)
06/01/82
08/01/77
03/01/00(L)
(NSFHA)
06/01/88(L)
04/02/79
09/05/75
02/18/81
(NSFHA)
09/01/96(L)
07/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
10/17/86
08/25/81
01/01/87(L)
09/29/79
11/17/82
08/03/81
09/30/88(M)
09/01/87(L)
09/29/86
05/16/94
08/05/86
10/17/86
09/01/87(L)
11/05/86
08/01/87(L)
11/20/98
03/01/97(L)
08/03/81
02/06/91
09/01/86(L)
07/04/88
02/01/87(L)
08/15/80
08/19/85(M)
09/1 8/9 1(M)
03/16/89
09/01/96(L)
11/17/82
08/26/80(M)
06/15/78
09/01/96(L)
01/01/87(L)
01/19/00(M)
09/04/85(M)
07/01/91(L)
03/01/97(L)
Page 7 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190327#
190489#
190899#
190061B
190901#
190507A
190232#
19043 1#
190244#
190332#
190024B
190167B
190210#
190361#
190418A
190100A
190399
190245#
190443#
190351B
190199#
190253B
190129A
190343A
190352A
190921
190513B
190385
190422A
190162#
190238B
190122#
190296
190239#
190297
190655A
190132B
190905#
190216B
190338
190319#
190220A
195184#
190218B
190207B
190658B
190298#
190033B
190299
Community Name
PLAINFIELD, CITY OF
PLEASANT HILL, CITY OF
PLYMOUTH COUNTY*
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY *
PORTSMOUTH, CITY OF
POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY*
PRESTON, CITY OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
QUASQUETON, TOWN OF
RAYMOND, CITY OF
REASNOR, CITY OF
RED OAK, CITY OF
REDFIELD, CITY OF
RICEVILLE, CITY OF
RICKETTS, CITY OF
RIPPEY, CITY OF
RIVERDALE, CITY OF
ROBINS, CITY OF
ROCK FALLS, CITY OF
ROCK RAPIDS, CITY
ROCK VALLEY, CITY OF
ROCKFORD, CITY OF
ROCKWELL CITY, CITY OF
ROCKWELL, CITY OF
RODNEY, CITY OF
ROLAND, CITY OF
RUDD, CITY OF
RUTLAND, CITY OF
SABULA, CITY OF
SAC CITY, CITY OF
SAGEVILLE, CITY OF
SALIX, CITY OF
SCOTT COUNTY *
SERGEANT BLUFF, CITY OF
SEYMOUR, CITY OF
SHEFFIELD, CITY OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
SHELDON, CITY OF
SHELL ROCK, CITY OF
SHELLSBURG, CITY OF
SHENANDOAH, CITY OF
SHUEYVILLE, CITY OF
SIBLEY, CITY OF
SILVER CITY, CITY OF
SIOUX CENTER, CITY OF
SIOUX CITY, CITY OF
SIOUX RAPIDS, CITY OF
SLOAN, CITY OF
County
BREMER COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
O'BRIEN COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
BUENA VISTA
COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/01/86(R)
10/08/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/01/92(R)
03/01/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/03/93(R)
02/28/94(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/02/87(R)
07/11/78(R)
09/01/96(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/01/00(R)
09/01/89(R)
04/15/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/01/97(R)
08/01/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/01/87(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/10/80(R)
04/02/90(R)
02/29/00
09/01/96(R)
11/19/87(R)
03/18/86(R)
06/15/84(R)
04/25/80(R)
06/01/77(R)
03/18/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/01/91(R)
02/10/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/01/92(R)
09/03/97(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/91(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/02/88(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/18/87(R)
06/10/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/90
05/03/82
06/06/01
01/01/92(L)
07/19/00
09/01/86(L)
04/04/83
03/03/92(M)
11/01/79
07/21/99
07/11/78(M)
09/01/96(L)
01/03/90
01/19/00(M)
03/01/00(L)
09/01/89(L)
(NSFHA)
11/13/79
07/05/82
07/01/97(L)
05/02/91
11/01/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
02/01/87(L)
07/01/91(L)
(NSFHA)
04/02/90(M)
04/23/76
09/01/96(L)
11/19/87
03/18/86(M)
06/15/84
(NSFHA)
02/04/98
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
07/01/91(L)
02/10/81(M)
09/18/85(M)
05/01/92(L)
09/17/97(M)
09/01/86(L)
09/01/91(L)
09/27/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/02/88
06/06/01
06/18/87(M)
(NSFHA)
Page 8 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190300A
190432A
190344A
190071#
190949#
190084B
190056
190259#
190907#
190029#
190810
190262#
190811
190812
190062A
190394A
190173#
190057B
190840A
190668A
190669#
190494#
190142A
190923#
190230#
190101A
190265#
190674
190426A
190468
190016#
190085B
190675
190504A
190821A
19091 1#
190194#
190912#
190064B
190025#
190381A
190678#
190008
190030#
190137#
190831#
190276#
Community Name
SMITHLAND, CITY OF
SOLON, CITY OF
SOMERS, CITY OF
SPENCER, CITY OF
SPRING HILL, CITY OF
ST. OLAF, CITY OF
STANWOOD, CITY OF
STORY CITY, CITY OF
STORY COUNTY *
SUMNER, CITY OF
SWISHER, CITY OF
TAMA, CITY OF
TEMPLETON, CITY OF
TERRIL, CITY OF
THORNTON, CITY OF
THURMAN, TOWN OF
TIFFIN, CITY OF
TIPTON, CITY OF
TITONKA, CITY OF
TRAER, CITY OF
TRIPOLI, CITY OF
UNDERWOOD, CITY OF
UNION, CITY OF
UNIONVILLE, TOWN OF
URBANDALE, CITY OF
VAIL, CITY OF
VAN BUREN COUNTY
VENTURA, CITY OF
VICTOR, CITY OF
VILLISICA, CITY OF
VINTON, CITY OF
VOLGA, CITY OF
WALCOTT, CITY OF
WALL LAKE, CITY OF
WALLINGFORD, CITY OF
WAPELLO COUNTY *
WAPELLO, CITY OF
WARREN COUNTY *
WASHTA, CITY OF
WATERLOO, CITY OF
WAUCOMA, CITY OF
WAUKEE, CITY OF
WAUKON, CITY OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WEBSTER CITY, CITY OF
WEBSTER COUNTY *
WELLMAN, CITY OF
County
WOODBURY COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
APPANOOSE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
CERRO GORDO
COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
BLACK HAWK
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
BREMER COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/27/85(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/01/96(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/26/98(R)
08/01/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
01/16/81(R)
06/01/83(R)
07/16/90(R)
05/23/94
01/17/90(R)
06/10/80(R)
06/10/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/28/94(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/01/88(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/11/98(R)
01/24/00
08/01/86(R)
10/31/00
03/02/8 1(R)
08/01/86(R)
07/29/98
09/01/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/03/01(R)
06/10/80(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/01/85(R)
09/18/95
Current Effective
Map
09/27/85(M)
07/01/91(L)
09/01/96(L)
04/19/83
(NSFHA)
08/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
01/16/81
06/01/83
07/16/90
08/13/76
01/17/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/01/87(L)
08/19/85(M)
07/01/91(L)
09/04/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
09/04/85(M)
09/28/94
06/01/82
06/01/87(L)
07/01/88(L)
07/19/00
08/19/86(M)
09/22/99
11/05/76
08/01/86(L)
08/13/76
03/02/81
08/01/86(L)
07/09/76
09/01/86(L)
07/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
02/06/91
11/20/98
09/27/85(M)
07/03/85
09/29/86(M)
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
07/16/90
08/01/78
10/01/85(L)
10/06/00
Page 9 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190089B
190058#
19023 1#
190215#
190683
190482#
190102#
190179A
190684#
190427#
190686A
190687#
190944#
190152B
190536B
190123#
190434#
190260A
Community Name
WELTON, CITY OF
WEST BRANCH, CITY OF
WEST DBS MOINES, CITY OF
WEST LIBERTY, CITY OF
WEST POINT, CITY OF
WESTFIELD, CITY OF
WESTSIDE, CITY OF
WHAT CHEER, CITY OF
WHITING, CITY OF
WILLIAMSBURG, CITY OF
WILTON, CITY OF
WINDSOR HEIGHTS, CITY OF
WINTERSET, CITY OF
WOODBINE, CITY OF
WOODBURY COUNTY *
WORTHINGTON, CITY OF
WYOMING, CITY OF
ZEARING, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
CLINTON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
KEOKUK COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
450
426
35
203
24
23
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/85(R)
03/16/83(R)
11/01/79(R)
10/17/86(R)
04/15/79(R)
10/20/99(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/01/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/06/89(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/15/79(R)
05/03/93(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/17/91(R)
10/18/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/85(M)
03/16/83
11/01/79
10/17/86
(NSFHA)
06/06/01
09/01/86(L)
08/01/87(L)
01/01/87(L)
09/06/89
07/01/91(L)
10/16/92
05/03/93
09/04/85(M)
06/17/91
10/18/83
09/04/85(M)
05/01/87(L)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 10 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
190386A
190945#
190542
190005A
190197B
190335
190092A
190217
190700A
190428B
190322
190303A
190845#
190438
190320
190517
190495A
190476
190849#
190255#
190001
190462
190509#
190854A
190855#
190269
190857#
190401
190518
190388
190519
190345
190564#
190290B
190109
190358#
190532
190863#
190305A
190572A
190728A
190416A
190457
190301A
Community Name
**IOWA
ACKLEY, CITY OF
ACKWORTH, CITY OF
ALBION, CITY OF
ALLAMAKEE COUNTY*
ALVORD, CITY OF
APLINGTON, CITY OF
ARION, CITY OF
ASHTON, CITY OF
BAGLEY, CITY OF
BALDWIN, CITY OF
BEAVER, CITY OF
BELMOND, CITY OF
BENTON COUNTY *
BERTRAM, CITY OF
BLAIRSTOWN, CITY OF
BLOCKTON, CITY OF
BROOKLYN, CITY OF
BRUNSVILLE, CITY OF
BUENA VISTA COUNTY *
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CARBON, CITY OF
CASTANA, CITY OF
CHATSWORTH, CITY OF
CHEROKEE COUNTY *
CHICKASAW COUNTY *
CHILLICOTHE, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CONRAD, CITY OF
CONWAY, CITY OF
COULTER, CITY OF
CROMWELL, CITY OF
CUMBERLAND, CITY OF
DALLAS CENTER, TOWN OF
DANBURY, CITY OF
DAVIS CITY, CITY OF
DAWSON, CITY OF
DECORAH, CITY OF
DELAWARE COUNTY *
DOWS, CITY OF
EARLY, CITY OF
ELBERON, CITY OF
ELMA, CITY OF
FERGUSON, CITY OF
FERTILE, CITY OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
BUENA VISTA
COUNTY
STORY COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
WAPELLO COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WINNESHIEK
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/16/76
1 1/20/98(F)
04/23/76
06/03/77
09/18/85(F)
06/25/76
09/06/74
07/11/75
01/01/87(F)
06/18/87(F)
10/29/76
05/03/74
05/24/77
07/02/76
09/19/75
09/26/75
07/17/86(F)
07/02/76
11/15/77
06/1 5/8 1(F)
06/25/76
08/29/75
08/13/76
05/06/77
05/24/77
11/08/74
06/07/77
04/16/76
07/02/76
08/13/76
06/25/76
10/29/76
01/19/00(F)
09/18/85(F)
07/18/75
01/19/00(F)
12/10/76
07/22/80
06/21/74
10/29/76
09/18/85(F)
08/01/86(F)
09/26/75
08/04/87(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/16/77
1 1/20/99
04/23/77
06/03/78
06/03/88(8)
06/25/77
09/06/75
07/11/76
06/03/88(8)
06/03/88(8)
10/29/77
05/03/75
05/24/78
07/02/77
09/19/76
09/26/76
07/17/86(W)
07/02/77
11/15/78
06/03/88(8)
06/25/77
08/29/76
08/13/77
05/06/78
05/24/78
11/08/75
06/07/78
04/16/77
07/02/77
08/13/77
06/25/77
10/29/77
01/19/01
09/18/85(8)
07/18/76
08/13/77
12/10/77
07/22/81
06/21/75
10/29/77
06/19/89(8)
08/01/86(8)
09/26/76
08/04/87(8)
Page 11 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190483
190284B
190867#
190324
190321
190924#
190584#
190466
190403
190497
190236#
190833
190589#
190455
190484
190330
190411
190598A
190878#
190533
190744
190408
190436
190425
190331
190006A
190606A
190448A
190608
190768
190886A
190769A
190498
190834
190208B
190383
190348
190456
190349
190512
190779
190166
190459
190161
190523
190334A
190082A
190472A
Community Name
FONDA, CITY OF
FORT ATKINSON, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRASER, CITY OF
GARRISON, CITY OF
GILLETT GROVE, TOWN OF
GOLDFIELD, CITY OF
GRANT, CITY OF
GRUNDY CENTER, CITY OF
GUERNEY, CITY OF
HANCOCK, CITY OF
HANLONTOWN, CITY OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HARVEY, CITY OF
HAVELOCK, CITY OF
HAZELTON, CITY OF
HUBBARD, CITY OF
INWOOD, CITY OF
IOWA COUNTY *
JACKSON JCT., CITY OF
JAMAICA, CITY OF
KANAWHA, CITY OF
KINROSS, CITY OF
LADORA, CITY OF
LAMONT, CITY OF
LANSING, CITY OF
LE GRAND, CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, CITY OF
LIVERMORE, CITY OF
LUVERNE, CITY OF
LYON COUNTY *
LYTTON, CITY OF
MALCOM, CITY OF
MANLY, CITY OF
MAPLETON, CITY OF
MARBLE ROCK, CITY OF
MARNE, CITY OF
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MASSENA, CITY OF
MAURICE, CITY OF
MILES,CITY OF
MINGO, CITY OF
MITCHELL, CITY OF
MONMOUTH, CITY OF
MT. STERLING, CITY OF
NEWELL, CITY OF
NORTH BUENAVISTA, CITY OF
OCHEYEDAN, CITY OF
County
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
WINNESHIEK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
POTTAWATTAMIE
COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
WINNESHIEK
COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KEOKUK COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
KOSSUTH COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
BUENA VISTA
COUNTY
CLAYTON COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/30/76
08/04/87(F)
05/22/79
07/30/76
08/08/75
04/10/79
06/25/76
11/19/76
07/02/76
04/30/76
07/16/81(F)
06/04/76
11/20/98(F)
03/19/76
03/19/76
05/28/76
07/02/76
08/01/87(F)
08/16/77
06/25/76
08/13/76
10/29/76
08/13/76
09/19/75
09/12/75
11/12/76
09/01/87(F)
09/18/85(F)
10/29/76
09/19/75
05/31/77
09/01/87(F)
09/19/75
07/09/76
09/27/85(F)
07/30/76
10/29/76
07/02/76
05/21/76
03/19/76
11/19/76
09/05/75
1 1/05/76
01/17/75
08/13/76
09/01/86(F)
10/18/74
09/18/85(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/30/77
08/04/87(8)
05/22/80
07/30/77
08/08/76
04/10/80
06/25/77
11/19/77
07/02/77
04/30/77
08/30/75
06/04/77
03/19/77
03/19/77
03/19/77
05/28/77
07/02/77
08/01/87(8)
08/16/78
06/25/77
08/13/77
10/29/77
08/13/77
09/19/76
09/12/76
11/12/77
02/19/92(8)
09/18/85(8)
10/29/77
09/19/76
05/31/78
09/01/87(8)
09/19/76
07/09/77
07/07/00(8)
07/30/77
10/29/77
07/02/77
05/21/77
03/19/77
11/19/77
09/05/76
1 1/05/77
01/17/76
08/13/77
07/05/93(8)
10/18/75
09/18/85(8)
Page 12 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190083#
190294A
190479
190405
190337
190295B
190486
190004
190419A
190392
190646A
190480A
190342
190648A
190393
190414
190800
190649A
190801
190531
190652
190499
190521
190906#
190805
190285
190116B
190444A
190461
190333
190141
190469
190666
190813A
190667
190671A
190464
190362#
190380
190820
190445
190317
190680
190823
190090B
190688A
190915#
190350
190410
Community Name
OSTERDOCK, CITY OF
OTO, CITY OF
OYENS, CITY OF
PANORA, CITY OF
PARKERSBURG, CITY OF
PIERSON, CITY OF
POCAHONTAS, CITY OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
PROTIVIN, CITY OF
RANDOLPH, CITY OF
REINBECK, CITY OF
REMSEN, CITY OF
RINARD, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIVERTON, CITY OF
ROME, CITY OF
RUNNELLS, CITY OF
RUSSELL, CITY OF
RYAN, CITY OF
SCARVILLE, CITY OF
SCHALLER, CITY OF
SEARSBORO, CITY OF
SHANNON CITY, CITY OF
SIOUX COUNTY *
SOLDIER, CITY OF
SPILLVILLE, CITY OF
SPIRIT LAKE, CITY OF
SPRINGVILLE, CITY OF
STACYVILLE, CITY OF
STANLEY, CITY OF
STEAMBOAT ROCK, CITY OF
STOCKTON, CITY OF
THOMPSON, CITY OF
THOR, TOWN OF
TOLEDO, CITY OF
UNIVERSITY PARK, TOWN OF
UTE, CITY OF
VAN METER, CITY OF
WADENA, CITY OF
WALFORD, CITY OF
WALKER, CITY OF
WATERVILLE, CITY OF
WELLSBURG, CITY OF
WESTGATE, CITY OF
WHEATLAND, CITY OF
WINFIELD, CITY OF
WINNEBAGO COUNTY *
WIOTA, CITY OF
WODEN, CITY OF
County
CLAYTON COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
GUTHRIE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
WOODBURY COUNTY
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
SAC COUNTY
POWESHIEK COUNTY
RINGGOLD COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
WINNESHIEK
COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
MUSCATINE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
TAMA COUNTY
MAHASKA COUNTY
MONONA COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
ALLAMAKEE
COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
08/01/86(F)
09/13/74
07/16/76
08/06/76
07/02/76
09/18/85(F)
07/30/76
1 1/05/76
08/19/86(F)
03/19/76
12/10/76
08/01/86(F)
10/29/76
08/01/86(F)
08/13/76
07/09/76
09/19/75
05/01/88(F)
03/26/76
07/02/76
1 1/05/76
10/29/76
08/13/76
10/25/77
08/13/76
10/29/76
09/01/87(F)
04/01/77
03/26/76
06/25/76
01/03/75
11/19/76
09/19/75
09/13/77
09/12/75
03/19/76
03/19/76
01/19/00(F)
08/13/76
08/13/76
10/29/76
04/16/76
10/08/76
10/29/76
06/28/74
09/01/86(F)
07/26/77
03/19/76
04/30/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/03/88(8)
09/13/75
07/16/77
08/06/77
07/02/77
09/18/85(8)
07/30/77
1 1/05/77
08/19/86(8)
03/19/77
12/10/77
06/15/94(8)
10/29/77
06/03/88(8)
08/13/77
07/09/77
09/19/76
05/01/88(8)
03/26/77
07/02/77
1 1/05/77
10/29/77
08/13/77
10/25/78
08/13/77
10/29/77
09/01/87(8)
04/01/78
03/26/77
06/25/77
01/03/76
11/19/77
09/19/76
09/13/78
09/12/76
03/19/77
03/19/77
09/26/76
08/13/77
08/13/77
10/29/77
04/16/77
10/08/77
10/29/77
06/28/75
09/01/86(8)
07/26/78
03/19/77
04/30/77
Page 13 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
190070
190827#
190474
190371
Community Name
WOODBURN, CITY OF
WOOLSTOCK, CITY OF
YORKTOWN, CITY OF
ZWINGLE, CITY OF
County
CLARKE COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
DUBUQUE COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
12/20/74
06/25/76
10/08/76
1 1/05/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
12/20/75
06/25/77
10/08/77
1 1/05/77
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 24
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 1
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 143
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 143
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 14 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
"KANSAS
200074# ABILENE, CITY OF
2000 1 7# ALBERT, CITY OF
200291 ALDEN, CITY OF
200568# ALLEN COUNTY *
200245B ALMENA, CITY OF
200462 ALTAMONT, CITY OF
200382A ALTOONA, CITY OF
200202# AMERICUS, CITY OF
200322 ANDALE, CITY OF
200569# ANDERSON COUNTY *
200383# ANDOVER, CITY OF
200384A ARCADIA, CITY OF
200070# ARKANSAS CITY, CITY OF
200465 ARMA, CITY OF
200049 ASHLAND, CITY OF
200385 ASSARIA, CITY OF
2000 10# ATCHISON, CITY OF
200 127 ATTICA, CITY OF
200280# ATWOOD, CITY OF
200038# AUGUSTA, CITY OF
200088# BALDWIN CITY, CITY OF
2000 1 6# BARTON COUNTY*
200187B BASEHOR, CITY OF
200045B BAXTER SPRINGS, CITY OF
200243# BAZINE, CITY OF
200864# BEL AIRE, CITY OF
200466# BELLE PLAINE, CITY OF
200287 BELLEVILLE, CITY OF
200226C BELOIT, CITY OF
200270 BELVUE, CITY OF
200 195 BLUE MOUND, CITY OF
200361# BONNER SPRINGS, CITY OF
200022# BOURBON COUNTY*
200394B BROOKVILLE, CITY OF
200026A BROWN COUNTY*
200472 BUHLER, CITY OF
200396 BURDETT, CITY OF
200063# BURLINGTON, CITY OF
200157A BURR OAK, CITY OF
200292 BUSHTON, CITY OF
200037# BUTLER COUNTY *
200230B CANEY, CITY OF
200250# CARBONDALE, CITY OF
200041# CEDAR POINT, CITY OF
20023 8 A CENTRALIA, CITY OF
20024 1# CHANUTE, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
DICKINSON COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
NORTON COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
COWLEY COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
HARPER COUNTY
RAWLINS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
NESS COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
REPUBLIC COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
WYANDOTTE
COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
JEWELL COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
NEOSHO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/78(R)
01/17/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/28/90(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/06/84(R)
04/01/89(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/11/76(R)
1 1/23/99
12/04/86(R)
04/01/89(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/06/84(R)
06/01/78(R)
04/15/79(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/15/80(R)
01/02/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
12/07/84(R)
03/18/86(R)
07/04/89(R)
03/15/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
07/06/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/19/83(R)
07/06/84(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/01/88(R)
01/04/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/11/97
12/04/79(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/20/84(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/03/86(R)
03/04/88(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/03/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/16/88
01/17/86
(NSFHA)
09/28/90
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/01/89(L)
04/15/82
(NSFHA)
12/13/77
12/04/86
04/01/89(L)
05/15/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/01/78
(NSFHA)
08/16/88
05/21/01
01/02/80
10/16/96
12/07/84(M)
03/18/86(M)
07/04/89
03/18/87
04/16/90
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/03/79
06/01/88(L)
01/04/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
03/26/76
09/20/96
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
07/03/86(M)
03/04/88
02/19/87
09/01/86(L)
01/03/79
Page 1 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200075#
200040#
200293B
200044#
200231
200480A
200117#
200053B
200052#
200482#
200059B
200232A
200350#
200046B
200484#
200060A
200234#
200160#
200563#
200564B
200257A
200487#
200323#
200161#
200404
200575#
205184#
200078#
200087#
200205A
200188#
200162#
200362#
200039#
200408A
200018#
200094#
200095#
200098#
200042A
200080
200203#
200492#
200242#
200493A
200089#
200120B
205185#
200099#
Community Name
CHAPMAN, CITY OF
CHASE COUNTY *
CHASE, CITY OF
CHEROKEE COUNTY*
CHERRYVALE, CITY OF
CHETOPA, CITY OF
CIMARRON, CITY OF
CLAY CENTER, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY*
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
CLYDE, CITY OF
COFFEYVILLE, CITY OF
COLBY, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COLWICH, CITY OF
CONCORDIA, CITY
COUNCIL GROVE, CITY OF
COUNTRYSIDE, CITY OF
COWLEY COUNTY *
CRAWFORD COUNTY *
CULVER, CITY OF
DELPHOS, CITY OF
DERBY, CITY OF
DESOTO, CITY OF
DEXTER, CITY OF
DICKINSON COUNTY *
DODGE CITY, CITY OF
DONIPHAN COUNTY *
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DURHAM, CITY OF
EASTON, CITY OF
EDGERTON, CITY OF
EDWARDSVILLE, CITY OF
EL DORADO, CITY OF
ELK CITY, CITY OF
ELLINWOOD, CITY OF
ELLIS COUNTY*
ELLIS, CITY OF
ELLSWORTH, CITY OF
ELMDALE, CITY OF
EL WOOD, CITY OF
EMPORIA, CITY OF
ENTERPRISE, CITY OF
ERIE, CITY OF
ESKRIDGE, CITY OF
EUDORA, CITY OF
EUREKA, CITY OF
FAIRWAY, CITY OF
FINNEY COUNTY*
County
DICKINSON COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
GRAY COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
CLOUD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
CLOUD COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
COWLEY COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
COWLEY COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WYANDOTTE
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
ELLSWORTH COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
NEOSHO COUNTY
WABAUNSEE
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
FINNEY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/79(R)
05/01/90(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/05/91(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/06/89(R)
03/18/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
03/12/76(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/15/86(R)
07/11/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/03/87(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/05/91(R)
05/01/90(R)
01/01/87(R)
07/01/88(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/20/84(R)
12/16/88(R)
05/19/72(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
05/15/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/24/76(R)
04/01/89(R)
09/01/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/01/83(R)
05/04/89(R)
09/01/90(R)
07/28/78(R)
10/02/79(R)
12/16/88(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/01/89(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/01/91(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
09/03/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/16/88
05/01/90(L)
09/18/85(M)
08/05/91
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
09/06/89
03/18/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
08/15/80
08/05/85(M)
03/12/76
09/29/78
05/15/86(M)
02/15/85
07/01/87(L)
04/03/87(M)
09/27/91
08/05/91
05/01/90(L)
01/01/87(L)
07/01/88(L)
05/06/96
07/17/97
(NSFHA)
12/16/88
09/30/95
06/01/78
03/02/81
05/15/86(M)
11/01/79
07/17/97
09/29/78
06/20/01 >
04/01/89(L)
06/22/82
07/03/86
08/01/83
05/04/89
09/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
12/29/81
12/16/88
12/03/93
12/01/89(L)
01/16/81
09/01/91(L)
07/17/97
09/03/97
Page 2 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200494#
200101#
200023#
20021 IB
200565#
200358B
200496
200047B
200497#
205186#
200498C
200164#
200005#
200001
200579#
200499
200263
200061 A
200500
200338#
200019#
200501A
200064
200131#
200123
200502A
200136A
200129#
200585#
200096#
200324#
200076#
200281#
200132#
200030
200115
200505
200020#
200868#
200141#
200031
200508A
200142
200002#
200228A
200283#
200233#
200003#
200619#
200147#
200510
200345
200159#
Community Name
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FORD COUNTY*
FORT SCOTT, CITY OF
FRANKFORT, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FREDONIA, CITY OF
FRONTENAC, CITY OF
GALENA, CITY OF
GALVA, CITY OF
GARDEN CITY, CITY OF
GARDEN PLAIN, CITY OF
GARDNER, CITY OF
GARNETT, CITY OF
GAS, CITY OF
GEARY COUNTY*
GIRARD, CITY OF
GLADE, CITY OF
GLASCO, CITY OF
GODDARD, CITY OF
GOODLAND, CITY OF
GREAT BEND, CITY OF
GREENBURG,CITY OF
GRIDLEY, CITY OF
HALSTEAD, CITY OF
HAMILTON COUNTY*
HANOVER, CITY OF
HANSTON, CITY OF
HARPER, CITY OF
HARVEY COUNTY*
HAYS, CITY OF
HAYSVILLE, CITY OF
HERINGTON, CITY OF
HERNDON, CITY OF
HESSTON, CITY OF
HIAWATHA, CITY OF
HILL CITY, CITY OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HOISINGTON, CITY OF
HOLCOMB, CITY OF
HOLTON, CITY OF
HORTON, CITY OF
HOXIE, CITY OF
HOYT, CITY OF
HUMBOLDT, CITY OF
HUNTER, CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
IOLA, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JEWELL, CITY OF
JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY *
County
MARION COUNTY
FORD COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
FINNEY COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
GEARY COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
CLOUD COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HODGEMAN COUNTY
HARPER COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
RAWLINS COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
FINNEY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEWELL COUNTY
STANTON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/87(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
07/20/84(R)
05/15/86(R)
11/17/82(R)
03/03/73(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/15/77(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/20/84(R)
02/04/88(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/10/80(R)
02/24/8 1(R)
05/16/83(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/04/01
09/01/78(R)
10/16/96
09/27/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
10/23/79(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/17/81(R)
08/04/88(R)
10/30/79(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
02/05/86(R)
02/19/92(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/20/84(R)
03/01/01(R)
03/30/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/05/78(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
12/15/89(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
08/15/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/04/87
09/30/95
03/02/98
09/27/85(M)
06/03/91
06/17/86
(NSFHA)
05/15/86(M)
11/17/82
09/03/97
09/18/85(M)
07/17/97
08/04/88(M)
(NSFHA)
02/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
02/24/8 1(M)
10/16/96
02/01/87(L)
11/22/74
09/21/98
09/27/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
10/23/79(M)
09/21/98
07/03/86
08/17/81
08/04/88
10/30/79(M)
11/01/79
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/05/86
09/17/97
07/19/00
(NSFHA)
03/01/01(L)
(NSFHA)
09/28/90
09/27/85(M)
07/19/00
12/19/95
09/28/90
07/19/00
02/04/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/16/97
Page 3 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200112#
20051 1A
200363#
200588#
200429#
200589#
200183#
200092#
200513
200308B
200514
200590#
200182#
200189#
200259#
200090#
200186#
200190#
200167#
20009 1#
200168#
200082A
200517A
200330#
200193
200215#
200194
200191#
200294A
200265A
200432A
200222
20025 IB
20020 1#
200295#
200121C
200300#
200521
200436
200593#
200207#
200216#
200210B
200212#
200143
200148
Community Name
JUNCTION CITY, CITY OF
KANOPOLIS, CITY OF
KANSAS CITY, CITY OF
KEARNY COUNTY *
KECHI, CITY OF
KINGMAN COUNTY *
KINGMAN, CITY OF
KINSLEY, CITY OF
KIOWA, CITY OF
LA CROSSE, CITY OF
LA HARPE, CITY OF
LABETTE COUNTY *
LAKIN, CITY OF
LANSING, CITY OF
LARNED, CITY OF
LAWRENCE, CITY OF
LEAVENWORTH COUNTY *
LEAVENWORTH, CITY OF
LEAWOOD, CITY OF
LECOMPTON, CITY OF
LENEXA, CITY OF
LEONA, CITY OF
LEOTI, CITY OF
LIBERAL, CITY OF
LINCOLN CENTER, CITY OF
LINDSBORG, CITY OF
LINN COUNTY*
LINWOOD, CITY OF
LITTLE RIVER, CITY OF
LOGAN, CITY OF
LONGTON, CITY OF
LOUISBURG, CITY OF
LYNDON, CITY OF
LYON COUNTY *
LYONS, CITY OF
MADISON, CITY OF
MANHATTAN, CITY OF
MANKATO, CITY OF
MAPLE HILL, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY *
MARION, CITY OF
MARQUETTE, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MAYETTA, CITY OF
MC LOUTH, CITY OF
County
GEARY COUNTY
ELLSWORTH COUNTY
WYANDOTTE
COUNTY
KEARNY COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
KINGMAN COUNTY
KINGMAN COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
BARBER COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
KEARNY COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
RILEY COUNTY
JEWELL COUNTY
WABAUNSEE
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/78(R)
04/08/77(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/01/89(R)
08/15/80(R)
02/01/90(R)
06/18/80(R)
03/01/78(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/01/90(R)
06/11/76(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
03/15/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
01/07/77(R)
12/13/00
09/28/90(R)
07/20/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/03/96
08/01/79(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/01/90(R)
07/20/84(R)
06/03/86(R)
11/17/82(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/20/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
12/29/92
12/04/79(R)
08/01/78(R)
05/01/90(R)
12/01/77(R)
05/25/78(R)
07/20/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/18/87
04/08/77(M)
09/21/98
11/01/89(L)
08/15/80
02/01/90(L)
06/18/80
03/01/78
(NSFHA)
07/16/90(M)
(NSFHA)
09/01/90(L)
06/18/90(M)
08/15/80
12/01/83
03/02/81
06/20/00
01/05/78
07/17/97
03/15/79
07/17/97
01/07/77(M)
01/15/80
09/28/90
(NSFHA)
12/19/97
08/01/79
03/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
05/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
06/03/86(M)
11/17/82
03/16/98
03/05/90
09/05/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/22/78
12/04/79
08/01/78
05/01/90(L)
12/01/77
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 4 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
2002 14#
2002 17#
200015#
200169#
200220A
200051
200171#
200170#
200093A
200595#
200055A
200439
200218#
200325
200326#
200254B
200237#
200359#
200598#
200360A
200244#
2003 18#
200067
200133#
200284#
200542#
200248B
200073#
200301#
200173#
200223#
200255
200151
200545
200104#
200174#
200445
200224#
200963#
200184#
200566#
20002 1#
200354A
200208#
200153#
200267
200072#
200256
20062 1#
Community Name
MCPHERSON COUNTY *
MCPHERSON, CITY OF
MEDICINE LODGE, CITY OF
MERRIAM, CITY OF
MIAMI COUNTY*
MINNEOLA, CITY OF
MISSION HILLS, CITY OF
MISSION, CITY OF
MOLINE, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MORGANVILLE, CITY OF
MOUND VALLEY, CITY OF
MOUNDRIDGE, CITY OF
MOUNT HOPE, CITY OF
MULVANE, CITY OF
NATOMA, CITY OF
NEMAHA COUNTY *
NEODESHA, CITY OF
NEOSHO COUNTY *
NEOSHO FALLS, CITY OF
NESS CITY, CITY OF
NEW CAMBRIA, CITY OF
NEW STRAWN, CITY OF
NEWTON, CITY OF
NICKERSON, CITY OF
NORTH NEWTON, CITY OF
NORTON, CITY OF
OBERLIN, CITY OF
OGDEN, CITY OF
OLATHE, CITY OF
OSAWATOMIE, CITY OF
OSBORNE, CITY OF
OSKALOOSA, CITY OF
OSWEGO, CITY OF
OTTAWA, CITY OF
OVERLAND PARK, CITY OF
PALCO, CITY OF
PAOLA, CITY OF
PARK CITY, CITY OF
PARSONS, CITY OF
PAWNEE COUNTY *
PAWNEE ROCK, CITY OF
PAXICO, CITY OF
PEABODY, CITY OF
PERRY, CITY OF
PHILLIPSBURG, CITY OF
PITTSBURG, CITY OF
PORTIS, CITY OF
POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY*
County
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
BARBER COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
OSBORNE COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
NEOSHO COUNTY
WOODSON COUNTY
NESS COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
NORTON COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
RILEY COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
OSBORNE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
ROOKS COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
LABETTE COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
WABAUNSEE
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
OSBORNE COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/04/83(R)
03/16/83(R)
07/03/90(R)
05/15/78(R)
11/06/95
07/20/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/15/78(R)
08/21/75
06/01/88(R)
10/20/99(R)
07/20/84(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/27/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/15/78(R)
02/06/95
04/01/89(R)
07/04/89(R)
12/04/85(R)
08/03/84(R)
10/02/79(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/28/79(R)
07/16/87(R)
01/17/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
11/15/78(R)
09/19/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
07/18/94
09/19/84(R)
09/30/77(R)
08/03/84(R)
04/17/78(R)
11/19/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
02/01/90(R)
01/14/77(R)
01/04/85(R)
11/19/86(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/03/84(R)
05/01/79(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/04/83
03/16/83
07/03/90
07/17/97
06/07/77
(NSFHA)
07/17/97
07/17/97
01/16/76
06/01/88(L)
10/20/99
(NSFHA)
12/15/82
(NSFHA)
09/14/90
09/27/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
08/15/78
11/01/77
04/01/89(L)
07/04/89
12/04/85
(NSFHA)
12/05/89
07/19/00
06/15/79
07/16/87(M)
01/17/85
10/15/81
07/17/97
09/19/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/19/75
09/19/84
07/17/97
(NSFHA)
04/17/78
11/19/86
12/15/89
02/01/90(L)
07/03/86
01/04/85(M)
11/19/86
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
06/16/95
(NSFHA)
02/04/98
Page 5 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200175#
200278#
200549#
200550
200253A
200158
200107A
200296A
200025A
200567#
200290#
200298#
200303#
200035A
200176#
200454
200334#
200260A
200312A
200523
200319#
200316#
200135
200289#
200320
200527
200528
200321#
200134#
200240B
200606#
200529A
20033 1#
200177#
200335#
200344
200077#
200530#
200274#
200275#
200526A
200532#
200297#
200305B
200043B
200348#
200461
200124#
200258A
200313A
200192#
205187#
Community Name
PRAIRIE VILLAGE, CITY OF
PRATT, CITY OF
PRETTY PRAIRIE, CITY OF
PROTECTION, CITY OF
QUENEMO, CITY OF
RANDALL, CITY OF
RANTOUL, CITY OF
RAYMOND, CITY OF
REDFIELD, CITY OF
RENO COUNTY *
RICE COUNTY*
RILEY COUNTY *
RILEY, CITY OF
ROBINSON, CITY OF
ROELAND PARK, CITY OF
ROSE HILL, CITY OF
ROSSVILLE, CITY OF
ROZEL, CITY OF
RUSH CENTER, CITY OF
SABETHA, CITY OF
SALINA, CITY OF
SALINE COUNTY*
SATANTA, CITY OF
SCANDIA, CITY OF
SCOTT CITY, CITY OF
SCRANTON, CITY OF
SEDAN, CITY OF
SEDGWICK COUNTY*
SEDGWICK, CITY OF
SENECA, CITY OF
SEWARD COUNTY*
SHARON SPRINGS, CITY OF
SHAWNEE COUNTY *
SHAWNEE, CITY OF
SILVER LAKE, CITY OF
SMITH CENTER, CITY OF
SOLOMON, CITY OF
SOUTH HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
ST. GEORGE, CITY OF
ST. MARYS, CITY OF
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
STAFFORD, CITY OF
STERLING, CITY OF
STOCKTON, CITY OF
STRONG, CITY OF
SUMNER COUNTY *
SYLVAN GROVE, CITY OF
SYRACUSE, CITY OF
TESCOTT, CITY OF
TIMKEN, CITY OF
TONGANOXIE, CITY OF
TOPEKA, CITY OF
County
JOHNSON COUNTY
PRATT COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
JEWELL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
RILEY COUNTY
RILEY COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
REPUBLIC COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
WALLACE COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
NEOSHO COUNTY
STAFFORD COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
ROOKS COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
LEAVENWORTH
COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/78(R)
11/01/78(R)
09/28/90(R)
02/24/00
09/01/90(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/01/90(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/28/90(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/01/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
05/01/90(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/24/81(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/01/87(R)
05/01/88(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/05/86(R)
02/05/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
07/16/79(R)
08/03/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
06/01/88(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/15/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/01/99(R)
09/04/86(R)
06/01/82(R)
11/15/78(R)
10/15/80(R)
08/03/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/28/90(R)
02/03/93(R)
02/01/80(R)
09/05/90(R)
08/26/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/90(R)
04/16/90(R)
08/03/84(R)
10/17/86(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/17/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
1 0/23/7 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/17/97
09/30/83
07/19/00
07/02/76
09/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
09/01/90(L)
06/01/87(L)
08/01/86(L)
07/19/00
09/03/97
04/01/82
11/01/79
05/01/90(L)
07/17/97
(NSFHA)
12/18/79
05/01/87(L)
05/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
02/05/86
02/05/86
(NSFHA)
07/16/79
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/01/88(L)
06/03/86
11/30/82
09/27/85(M)
05/01/99(L)
09/04/86(M)
05/17/93
07/17/97
10/15/80
(NSFHA)
12/16/88
07/19/00
02/04/98
07/06/82
09/05/90(M)
08/26/80(M)
09/03/97
09/27/85(M)
09/01/90(L)
04/16/90
(NSFHA)
10/17/86
06/01/87(L)
07/17/86(M)
06/20/00
12/01/81
Page 6 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200534
200084
200371
200327B
200213A
200552
200122A
200553
200276#
200556
200085
200068B
200349#
200109
200180#
200179#
200559A
200328#
200337#
200285#
2006 17#
200560
20007 1#
200561
Community Name
TOWANDA, CITY OF
TROY, CITY OF
UNIONTOWN, CITY OF
VALLEY CENTER, CITY OF
VERMILLION, CITY OF
VICTORIA, CITY OF
VIRGIL, CITY OF
WAKEENEY, CITY OF
WAMEGO, CITY OF
WATERVILLE, CITY OF
WATHENA, CITY OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WELLINGTON, CITY OF
WELLSVILLE, CITY OF
WESTWOOD HILLS, CITY OF
WESTWOOD, CITY OF
WHITEWATER, CITY OF
WICHITA, CITY OF
WILLARD, CITY OF
WILLOWBROOK, CITY OF
WILSON COUNTY*
WILSON, CITY OF
WINFIELD, CITY OF
YATES CENTER, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
BUTLER COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
TREGO COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
ELLSWORTH COUNTY
COWLEY COUNTY
WOODSON COUNTY
319
307
64
84
12
10
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/10/80(R)
08/03/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
01/14/77(R)
05/01/90(R)
08/03/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/03/84(R)
10/28/77(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/16/90(R)
08/03/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
12/21/84(R)
05/15/86(R)
10/15/80(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/01/89(R)
08/03/84(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/03/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/14/77(M)
05/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
02/18/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
04/16/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/21/84(M)
05/15/86
10/15/80
07/19/00
04/01/89(L)
(NSFHA)
03/02/89
(NSFHA)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
200307
200380
200381
200464#
200009#
200332#
200867#
200467
200469
200470
200392A
200249A
200130#
200474#
200246#
200058#
200062#
200486
200399
200403
200574#
200405
200490
200235
200236A
200050
200409
200410
200495
200024
200412#
200342
200414
200227
200206
200239A
200006#
200418
2003 17#
200355
200029
200125#
200504
200081#
200507A
Community Name
"KANSAS
ALEXANDER, CITY OF
ALTA VISTA, CITY OF
ALTON, CITY OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
ATCHISON COUNTY*
AUBURN, CITY OF
BASSETT, CITY OF
BENNINGTON, CITY OF
BIRD CITY, CITY OF
BLUE RAPIDS, CITY OF
BREWSTER, CITY OF
BURLINGAME, CITY OF
BURRTON, CITY OF
CALDWELL, CITY OF
CLAYTON, CITY OF
CLOUD COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
COTTONWOOD FALLS, CITY OF
COURTLAND, CITY OF
DEARING, CITY OF
DECATUR COUNTY *
DORRANCE, CITY OF
DOWNS, CITY OF
DUNLAP, CITY OF
ELKHART, CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF
ENSIGN, CITY OF
ESBON, CITY OF
FOWLER, CITY OF
FULTON, CITY OF
GARFIELD, CITY OF
GAYLORD, CITY OF
GEUDA SPRINGS, CITY OF
GLEN ELDER, CITY OF
GOESSEL, CITY OF
GOFF, CITY OF
GREELEY, CITY OF
GRENOLA, CITY OF
GYPSUM, CITY OF
HADDAM, CITY OF
HAMLIN, CITY OF
HARPER COUNTY
HAVILAND, CITY OF
HIGHLAND, CITY OF
HOWARD, CITY OF
County
RUSH COUNTY
WABAUNSEE
COUNTY
OSBORNE COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
SHAWNEE COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
HARVEY COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
CLOUD COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
REPUBLIC COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
OSBORNE COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
GRAY COUNTY
JEWELL COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
COWLEY COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
HARPER COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
02/14/75
03/19/76
03/19/76
09/28/90(F)
05/31/77
01/16/81(F)
09/28/90(F)
03/26/76
07/30/76
03/26/76
07/16/76
03/01/74
04/22/77(F)
04/16/90(F)
01/02/80
08/23/77(F)
08/23/77
03/26/76
05/21/76
07/25/75
02/12/80
08/13/76
11/26/76
01/03/75
05/24/74
07/16/76
03/26/76
08/29/75
07/30/76
01/10/75
11/17/82(F)
12/27/74
09/12/75
12/27/74
11/22/74
1 1/08/74
03/20/79(F)
09/26/75
ll/25/80(F)
12/27/74
09/19/75
07/01/80
08/22/75
12/15/83(F)
04/08/77(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/05/89(W)
03/19/77
03/19/77
09/26/76
05/31/78
01/16/81(8)
09/28/91
03/26/77
07/30/77
03/26/77
07/16/77
03/01/75
12/01/88(W)
09/19/76
01/02/81
08/23/78
08/23/78
03/26/77
05/21/77
07/25/76
02/12/81
08/13/77
11/26/77
01/03/76
05/24/75
07/16/77
03/26/77
08/29/76
07/30/77
01/10/76
06/04/77
12/27/75
09/12/76
12/27/75
11/22/75
1 1/08/75
1 1/22/75
09/26/76
05/17/89(8)
12/27/75
09/19/76
07/01/81
08/22/76
02/01/75
12/16/88(W)
Page 8 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
200118
200137B
200512
200007
200329
200196A
200166
200103#
200065
200247
200066B
200266A
200272#
200519
200433
200520
200310
200219B
200537
200538
200225#
200116A
200032
200356
200197B
2000 14A
200204
200543
200544
20060 1#
200547#
200357
200198
200446#
200447
200199
200200
200449
200522
200450
200279#
2003 15B
200455
200097
200458
200229A
200459#
200524
200368
200865#
200373A
Community Name
INGALLS, CITY OF
JETMORE, CITY OF
KENSINGTON, CITY OF
KINCAID, CITY OF
KISMET, CITY OF
LA CYGNE, CITY OF
LAKE QUIVIRA, CITY OF
LANE, CITY OF
LEBO, CITY OF
LENORA, CITY OF
LEROY, CITY OF
LONG ISLAND, CITY OF
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LUCAS, CITY OF
LURAY, CITY OF
MAIZE, CITY OF
MCCRACKEN, CITY OF
MEADE, CITY OF
MILTONVALE, CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF
MITCHELL COUNTY *
MORLAND, CITY OF
MORRILL, CITY OF
MORROWVILLE, CITY OF
MOUND CITY, CITY OF
MUSCOTAH, CITY OF
NEOSHO RAPIDS, CITY OF
OAKLEY, CITY OF
ONAGA, CITY OF
OSAGE COUNTY *
OXFORD, CITY OF
PALMER, CITY OF
PARKER, CITY OF
PARTRIDGE, CITY OF
PERU, CITY OF
PLEASANTON, CITY OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
PRESTON, CITY OF
QUINTER, CITY OF
RANSOM, CITY OF
RAWLINS COUNTY *
RUSSELL, CITY OF
SCAMMON, CITY OF
SCHOENCHEN, CITY OF
SHARON, CITY OF
SIMPSON, CITY OF
SOUTH HAVEN, CITY OF
ST. FRANCIS, CITY OF
TREECE, CITY OF
TURON, CITY OF
WALNUT, CITY OF
County
GRAY COUNTY
HODGEMAN COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
NORTON COUNTY
COFFEY COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
SEDGWICK COUNTY
RUSH COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
CLOUD COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
PRATT COUNTY
GOVE COUNTY
NESS COUNTY
RAWLINS COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
BARBER COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
RENO COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
12/20/74
09/04/85(F)
08/22/75
1 1/22/74
11/22/74
03/15/74
07/26/77(F)
12/27/74
02/01/74
11/19/76
12/28/73
09/01/86(F)
12/02/88(F)
07/02/76
07/02/76
10/29/76
11/22/74
09/04/85(F)
09/12/75
08/06/76
06/15/88(F)
03/11/77
11/22/74
12/06/74
03/01/74
1 1/22/74
01/03/75
07/02/76
08/13/76
08/09/77
04/16/90(F)
12/20/74
02/07/75
09/28/90(F)
09/26/75
06/14/74
04/23/76
10/29/76
12/24/76
11/12/76
02/19/80
02/08/74
09/19/75
01/17/75
08/22/75
01/01/87(F)
04/16/90(F)
09/19/75
03/26/76
09/28/90(F)
08/19/86(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
12/20/75
09/04/85(8)
08/22/76
1 1/22/75
11/22/75
03/15/75
06/05/89(8)
12/27/75
02/01/75
11/19/77
12/28/74
09/01/86(8)
12/02/88(8)
07/02/77
07/02/77
10/29/77
11/22/75
09/04/85(8)
09/12/76
08/06/77
06/15/88(8)
03/11/78
11/22/75
12/06/75
03/01/75
1 1/22/75
01/03/76
07/02/77
08/13/77
08/09/78
08/08/76
12/20/75
02/07/76
12/17/77
09/26/76
06/14/75
04/23/77
10/29/77
12/24/77
11/12/77
02/19/81
02/08/75
09/19/76
01/17/76
08/22/76
06/11/97(W)
09/19/76
09/19/76
03/26/77
09/28/91
05/17/89(8)
Page 9 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
200555A WASHINGTON, CITY OF
200557 WEIR, CITY OF
200008 WESTPHALIA, CITY OF
200086# WHITE CLOUD, CITY OF
200379 WOODSTON, CITY OF
200562# WYANDOTTE COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
DONIPHAN COUNTY
ROOKS COUNTY
WYANDOTTE
COUNTY
0
12
4
100
100
Hazard Area
Identified
09/27/85(F)
09/19/75
12/20/74
08/01/84(F)
09/26/75
12/18/79(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
11/15/85(8)
09/19/76
12/20/75
08/01/84(8)
09/26/76
05/17/89(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 10 of 10
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210059B
210267#
210070#
210002#
210043#
210017#
210148C
210022#
210268#
210132#
210178#
210044#
210334#
210008A
210136#
210184#
210010#
210035#
210099#
210163B
210156#
210371#
210179#
210108B
210013#
210187B
210271#
210219#
210016#
210322#
210021#
210161B
210170B
210023#
210025#
210253#
210236A
210273B
210171B
210061#
210029#
210188B
210354#
210154B
210036#
210164#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"KENTUCKY
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALLEN COUNTY
ALLEN, TOWN OF
ANDERSON COUNTY*
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
ASHLAND, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUGUSTA, CITY OF
BALLARD COUNTY *
BARBOURVILLE, CITY OF
BARDSTOWN, CITY OF
BARD WELL, CITY OF
BARREN COUNTY *
BATH COUNTY
BEATTYVILLE, CITY OF
BEAVER DAM, TOWN OF
BELL COUNTY *
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BENHAM, CITY OF
BENTON, CITY OF
BEREA, CITY OF
BLACKEY, CITY OF
USE THE LETCHER COUNTY [210289] FHBM
BLOOMFIELD, CITY OF
BONNIEVILLE, TOWN OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BOONEVILLE, CITY OF
BOURBON COUNTY *
BOWLING GREEN, CITY OF
BO YD COUNTY *
BOYLE COUNTY*
BRACKEN COUNTY
Foster is now a part of Bracken County
BRADFORDSVILLE, CITY OF
BRANDENBURG,CITY OF
BREATHITT COUNTY *
BRECKINRIDGE COUNTY*
BROMLEY, CITY OF
BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF
BULLITT COUNTY*
BURGIN, CITY OF
BURKESVILLE, CITY OF
BUTLER COUNTY*
BUTLER, CITY OF
CADIZ, CITY OF
CALHOUN, TOWN OF
CALIFORNIA, CITY OF
CALVERT CITY, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
CLINTON COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
CARLISLE COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
BRACKEN COUNTY
BALLARD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
CARLISLE COUNTY
BARREN COUNTY
BATH COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LETCHER COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
HART COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
OWSLEY COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
BOYLE COUNTY
BRACKEN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
BREATHITT COUNTY
BRECKINRIDGE
COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
EDMONSON COUNTY
BULLITT COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
PENDLETON COUNTY
TRIGG COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/17/86(R)
03/01/95(R)
04/18/83(R)
05/15/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
1 1/03/78(R)
09/16/88(R)
09/29/89(R)
12/01/77(R)
11/19/80(R)
08/01/86(R)
02/15/95
08/01/87(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/05/93
06/04/80(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/02/80(R)
05/15/86(R)
11/01/97(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/98(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
07/01/91(R)
08/01/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
04/30/86(R)
12/15/97
08/19/86(R)
04/03/78(R)
08/05/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/17/86(M)
03/01/95(L)
03/19/90
05/15/86(M)
07/02/87(M)
09/29/78
05/22/81(M)
12/03/93
09/29/89
09/06/89
11/19/80
08/01/86(L)
08/19/77
08/01/87(L)
01/22/82
09/29/89
02/18/81
04/15/80
09/05/79
03/15/77
09/30/88
06/04/80
06/17/86(M)
06/15/81
08/05/85
07/16/81
09/30/93
12/02/80
05/15/86(M)
11/01/97(L)
09/04/85(M)
06/17/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
09/01/98(L)
04/15/80
09/04/91
07/01/91(L)
08/01/86(L)
07/03/86(M)
06/05/89
04/30/86(M)
09/29/78
08/19/86(M)
04/03/78
08/05/85
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210034#
210213B
210084B
210042#
210182B
210045
210232#
210050#
210018#
210175B
210277#
210278#
210195#
210057#
210222B
210327#
210111B
210026B
210263#
210227#
210129#
210254#
210100#
210107#
210019B
210062#
210113B
210037#
210167#
210114B
210173A
210095#
210356#
210381
210372
210378
210101#
210189#
210087#
210335
210290#
210068B
210238B
210069#
210038
210249#
210075#
210280#
210210B
210373
210076#
210281#
210081#
Community Name
CAMPBELL COUNTY *
CAMPBELLSVILLE, CITY OF
CANEYVILLE, CITY OF
CARLISLE COUNTY *
CARLISLE, CITY OF
CARROLL COUNTY*
CARROLLTON, CITY OF
CARTER COUNTY *
CATLETTSBURG, CITY OF
CENTRAL CITY, CITY OF
CHRISTIAN COUNTY*
CLARK COUNTY*
CLAY CITY, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY
CLAY, CITY OF
CLINTON COUNTY *
CLINTON, TOWN OF
CLOVERPORT, CITY OF
COAL RUN, VILLAGE OF
CORBIN, CITY OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
CRITTENDEN COUNTY *
CUMBERLAND, CITY OF
CYNTHIANA, CITY OF
DANVILLE, CITY OF
DAVIESS COUNTY *
DAWSON SPRINGS, CITY OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DOVER, CITY OF
EARLINGTON, CITY OF
EDMONTON, CITY OF
ELIZABETHTOWN, CITY OF
ELKHORN CITY, CITY OF
ELKTON, CITY OF
ELLIOTT COUNTY
ERLANGER, CITY OF
EVARTS, CITY OF
FALMOUTH, CITY OF
FLATWOODS, CITY OF
FLEMING COUNTY *
FLEMING-NEON, CITY OF
FLEMINGSBURG, CITY OF
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FLOYD COUNTY *
FORT THOMAS, CITY OF
FORT WRIGHT, CITY OF
FRANKFORT, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FRENCHBURG, CITY OF
FULTON, CITY OF
GALLATIN COUNTY*
GARRARD COUNTY *
County
CAMPBELL COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
CARLISLE COUNTY
NICHOLAS COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
MUHLENBERG
COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HICKMAN COUNTY
BRECKINRIDGE
COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
CRITTENDEN
COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BOYLE COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
METCALFE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
ELLIOTT COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
PENDLETON COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
FLEMING COUNTY
LETCHER COUNTY
FLEMING COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
MENIFEE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
GARRARD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/8 1(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/01/91(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/98(R)
09/04/85(R)
02/15/84(R)
01/03/79(R)
08/05/86(R)
11/01/97(R)
12/04/86(R)
09/06/89(R)
01/01/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
12/18/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/01/99(R)
03/15/77(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
07/01/87(R)
12/02/80(R)
11/01/85(R)
12/04/98
05/08/96
11/20/97
11/19/80(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/05/92(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/05/84(R)
09/01/98(R)
10/21/80(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/08/96
08/01/80(R)
07/20/97(R)
09/01/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/81
08/05/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
02/01/91(L)
09/27/85(M)
09/01/98(L)
02/02/89
02/15/84
01/03/79
08/05/86(M)
11/01/97(L)
12/04/86
02/19/92
01/01/87(L)
08/19/86(M)
08/19/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
09/18/85(M)
09/21/98
12/18/86
06/16/93
04/01/99(L)
02/05/92
10/15/81
09/27/85(M)
03/03/97
08/19/86(M)
05/15/84
06/02/99
09/1 8/9 1(M)
07/01/87(L)
11/04/88
09/21/98
11/19/80
04/16/97
07/16/81
(NSFHA)
08/19/87(M)
09/18/85(M)
07/03/86(M)
04/16/90
09/01/98(L)
06/16/93
07/02/81
09/30/81
09/27/85(M)
08/01/80
08/19/87
09/01/89(L)
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210208#
210046#
210007A
210337
210321#
210282#
210051#
210086B
210284#
210088#
210176B
210214B
210094#
210303#
210098#
210102#
210329#
210172B
210257#
210357#
210239#
215188#
210286#
210109#
210110#
210077#
210130A
210133B
210112#
210055#
210144B
210137#
210240#
210362#
210064#
210380
210118#
210024B
210206A
210120#
210121#
210358#
210138B
210125#
210339#
210377
210128#
210340#
210131#
210082B
210288#
210258#
Community Name
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GHENT, CITY OF
GLASGOW, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY *
GRATZ, CITY OF
GRAVES COUNTY
GRAYSON, CITY OF
GREENSBURG, CITY OF
GREENUP COUNTY*
GREENUP, CITY OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GUTHRIE, CITY OF
HARDIN COUNTY*
HARDIN, CITY OF
HARLAN COUNTY *
HARLAN, CITY OF
HARRISON COUNTY *
HARRODSBURG, CITY OF
HART COUNTY *
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HAWESVILLE, CITY OF
HAZARD, CITY OF
HENDERSON COUNTY*
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HENRY COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE CITY OF LOCKPORT
HICKMAN, CITY OF
HINDMAN, CITY OF
HODGENVILLE, CITY OF
HOPKINS COUNTY *
HOPKINSVILLE, CITY OF
HUSTONVILLE, CITY OF
HYDEN, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
INEZ, CITY OF
IRVINE, CITY OF
IRVINGTON, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY*
JACKSON, CITY OF
JAMESTOWN, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JEFFERSONTOWN, CITY OF
JEFFERSONVILLE, CITY OF
JENKINS, CITY OF
JESSAMINE COUNTY *
JOHNSON COUNTY*
JUNCTION CITY, CITY OF
KENTON COUNTY *
KNOTT COUNTY*
KNOX COUNTY *
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LARUE COUNTY *
LAWRENCE COUNTY*
County
SCOTT COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
BARREN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
GRAVES COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
MUHLENBERG
COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
HART COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
KNOTT COUNTY
LARUE COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LESLIE COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
ESTILL COUNTY
BRECKINRIDGE
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BREATHITT COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LETCHER COUNTY
JESSAMINE COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BOYLE COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
KNOTT COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
GARRARD COUNTY
LARUE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/8 1(R)
09/18/86(R)
05/01/87(R)
07/25/97
08/19/86(R)
12/01/92(R)
08/16/82(R)
05/15/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
07/05/82(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/30/86(R)
11/04/88(R)
10/15/97
08/15/78(R)
01/17/79(R)
05/31/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/04/85(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
03/10/72(R)
04/10/91(R)
06/15/78(R)
01/01/86(R)
07/16/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
03/16/92(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/17/80(R)
05/19/88(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/15/98
07/01/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/25/76(R)
04/16/79(R)
03/05/76(R)
06/29/98
06/03/86(R)
08/01/78(R)
05/04/88(R)
10/16/97
07/02/8 1(R)
02/01/87(R)
05/17/89(R)
12/14/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/04/81
09/18/86
05/01/87(L)
08/19/86(M)
12/01/92(L)
08/16/82
05/15/86(M)
01/19/83
07/05/82
08/19/86(M)
04/30/86(M)
11/04/88
01/25/80
08/15/78
01/17/79
11/04/81
08/19/86(M)
07/01/91(L)
09/29/89
01/19/95
03/18/83
02/06/91
06/17/86
01/01/86(L)
07/16/87(M)
07/01/87(L)
08/19/86(M)
08/19/91
09/05/79
09/27/85(M)
08/02/94
09/17/80
03/07/00
06/19/97
07/01/87(L)
09/27/85(M)
06/25/76(M)
02/02/94
02/02/94
09/08/78
06/03/86(M)
01/16/92
05/04/88
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
02/01/87(L)
05/17/89
12/14/79(M)
09/04/85(M)
06/18/90
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210003B
210304#
210162B
210135#
210324#
210141#
210149B
210093#
210067#
210054#
210325#
210155B
210146
210202B
210341#
210241#
210122#
215189B
210266#
210104#
210342#
210115#
210158#
210058B
210160#
210252#
210166#
210071#
210259
210083#
210168#
210151#
210343#
210119B
210153#
210169#
210250#
210344
210275#
210306#
215190#
210014B
210215#
210295B
210326#
210221B
210204#
210292#
210216A
210116
210234B
Community Name
LAWRENCEBURG, CITY OF
LEBANON JUNCTION, CITY OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY *
LESLIE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY*
LEWISBURG, CITY OF
LEWISPORT, CITY OF
LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY
GOVERNMENT
LIBERTY, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LIVERMORE, CITY OF
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LOUISA, CITY OF
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LOYALL, CITY OF
LUDLOW, CITY OF
LYNCH, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISONVILLE, CITY OF
MAGOFFIN COUNTY *
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARTIN COUNTY*
MARTIN, CITY OF
MASON COUNTY *
MAYFIELD, CITY OF
MAYSVILLE, CITY OF
MCCRACKEN COUNTY *
MCCREARY COUNTY *
MCKEE, CITY OF
MCLEAN COUNTY *
MEADE COUNTY*
MELBOURNE, CITY OF
MENIFEE COUNTY *
MENTOR, CITY OF
MERCER COUNTY*
MIDDLESBORO, CITY OF
MILLERSBURG, CITY OF
MILTON, CITY OF
MONTEREY, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MOREHEAD, CITY OF
MORGAN COUNTY
MORGANFIELD, CITY OF
MORTONS GAP, CITY OF
MT. STERLING, CITY OF
County
ANDERSON COUNTY
BULLITT COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LESLIE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CASEY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ROCKCASTLE
COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
MAGOFFIN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
GRAVES COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MCCRACKEN
COUNTY
MCCREARY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
MENIFEE COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
TRIMBLE COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/14/79(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/01/86(R)
02/19/87(R)
06/17/77(R)
11/19/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/06/0 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/26/97
11/19/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
04/06/73(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/02/79(R)
09/28/90(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/04/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/01/97(R)
02/19/86(R)
02/15/84(R)
11/01/97(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/04/80(R)
11/19/96
07/17/86(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
05/31/95(R)
03/28/80(R)
01/25/99
03/04/80(R)
10/18/88(R)
05/28/71(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/18/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/01/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/05/82(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/04/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/14/79(M)
06/18/90
09/27/85(M)
09/27/85(M)
02/19/87
06/17/77(M)
11/19/86
09/03/92
04/16/97
07/03/86(M)
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
06/17/86(M)
09/09/77
02/02/90
02/02/94
12/11/81
09/28/79
07/02/79
09/28/90
08/05/86
03/04/86
07/02/87(M)
08/19/85(M)
08/19/91
03/07/00
02/15/84
11/01/97(L)
03/16/81
03/07/80(M)
06/04/80
11/25/77
07/17/86(M)
02/15/91
02/06/91
03/28/80
03/04/80
10/18/88
07/02/81
09/27/85(M)
09/18/86
08/05/86(M)
05/01/87(L)
09/18/85(M)
07/05/82
08/05/86(M)
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210374
210243B
210033#
210177#
210180#
210039#
210181#
210126#
210305B
210375
210183#
210185#
210052#
210186#
210063#
210152#
210127#
210015#
210297
215191#
210020#
210298#
210193#
210012#
210194#
210072#
210047#
210031B
210223A
210197#
210089#
210366#
210319B
210157B
210200A
210331
210203#
210090#
210150#
210009B
210159#
210048B
210207#
210001B
210224B
210209#
210376
210028#
210124#
210040#
210316#
Community Name
MT. VERNON, CITY OF
MUNFORDVILLE, CITY OF
MURRAY, CITY OF
NELSON COUNTY *
NEW HAVEN, CITY OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NICHOLAS COUNTY *
NICHOLASVILLE, CITY OF
NORTONVILLE, CITY OF
OAK GROVE, CITY OF
OHIO COUNTY *
OLDHAM COUNTY*
OLIVE HILL, CITY OF
OWEN COUNTY *
OWENSBORO, CITY OF
PADUCAH, CITY OF
PAINTSVILLE, CITY OF
PARIS, CITY OF
PENDLETON COUNTY *
PERRY COUNTY *
PERRYVILLE, CITY OF
PIKE COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE CITY OF PHELPS and York Town
PIKEVILLE, CITY OF
PINEVILLE, CITY OF
POWELL COUNTY *
PRESTONSBURG, CITY OF
PRESTONVILLE, CITY OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PROVIDENCE, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY *
RACELAND, CITY OF
RADCLIFF, CITY OF
USE THE HARDIN COUNTY [210094] FIRM.
RAVENNA, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
ROBERTSON COUNTY *
ROCKCASTLE COUNTY *
ROWAN COUNTY *
RUSSELL, CITY OF
RUSSELLVILLE, CITY OF
SALT LICK, CITY OF
SALYERSVILLE, CITY OF
SANDERS, TOWN OF
SCOTT COUNTY *
SCOTTSVILLE, CITY OF
SEBREE, CITY OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
SHELBYVILLE, CITY OF
SHEPHERDSVILLE, CITY OF
SHIVELY, CITY OF
SILVER GROVE, CITY OF
SIMPSON COUNTY*
County
ROCKCASTLE
COUNTY
HART COUNTY
CALLOW AY COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
NICHOLAS COUNTY
JESSAMINE COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
OLDHAM COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
MCCRACKEN
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BOURBON COUNTY
PENDLETON COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BOYLE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
ESTILL COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
ROCKCASTLE
COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
BATH COUNTY
MAGOFFIN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
BULLITT COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/96
08/19/86(R)
04/01/80(R)
11/05/80(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/17/89(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/09/97
09/29/89(R)
08/19/87(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/01/99(R)
08/01/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/97
03/30/73(R)
12/03/87(R)
12/04/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/18/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/16/90(R)
03/15/82(R)
07/06/89(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/15/97
01/13/97(R)
01/19/83(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/01/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/23/96
06/09/97
01/02/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/15/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/86(M)
04/01/80
11/05/80
1 1/05/80
1 1/05/80
09/27/85(M)
04/17/89
06/17/86(M)
09/29/89
08/19/87
08/16/82
05/27/77
03/03/97
10/08/82
1 1/02/90
06/15/81
07/30/76
07/18/85
12/03/87
09/21/98
09/21/98
06/04/96
09/27/85(M)
04/02/90
09/18/86
08/19/86(M)
09/01/86(L)
07/16/90
03/15/82
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
03/25/77
(NSFHA)
01/19/83
01/19/83
05/02/94
09/18/85(M)
10/15/85
09/27/85(M)
09/30/81
09/27/85(M)
08/19/86(M)
07/15/77
01/02/87
02/02/94
10/15/80
05/01/87(L)
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
210225B
210147#
210199B
210091#
210079B
210211#
210220B
210123#
210261#
210145B
210196#
210217A
210212#
210246#
210247B
210315#
210300A
210270
210218
210142#
210231#
210192A
210096#
215192#
210379
210364#
210312#
210080#
210365
210073#
210348#
210174B
210097#
210074B
210140#
210226#
210006B
210041#
210228#
210311#
210056#
210230#
210092#
210049B
210285#
Community Name
SLAUGHTERS, CITY OF
SMITHLAND, CITY OF
SOMERSET, CITY OF
SOUTH SHORE, CITY OF
SPARTA, CITY OF
SPENCER COUNTY*
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. MATTHEWS, CITY OF
STAMPING GROUND, CITY OF
STANFORD, CITY OF
STANTON, CITY OF
STURGIS, CITY OF
TAYLOR COUNTY *
TAYLOR MILL, CITY OF
TAYLORSVILLE,CITY OF
TRIGG COUNTY *
TRIMBLE COUNTY*
UNION, CITY OF
UNIONTOWN, TOWN OF
VANCEBURG,TOWN OF
VERSAILLES, CITY OF
VICCO, CITY OF
VINE GROVE, CITY OF
WALLINS CREEK, CITY OF
WALTON, CITY OF
WARFIELD, TOWN OF
WARREN COUNTY *
WARSAW, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WAYLAND, TOWN OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WEST LIBERTY, CITY OF
WEST POINT, CITY OF
WHEELWRIGHT, TOWN OF
WHITESBURG, CITY OF
WHITLEY COUNTY*
WICKLIFFE, CITY OF
WILDER, CITY OF
WILLIAMSBURG, CITY OF
WILMOR, CITY OF
WINCHESTER, CITY OF
WOODFORD COUNTY*
WORTHINGTON, CITY OF
WORTHVILLE, CITY OF
WURTLAND, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
County
WEBSTER COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
OWEN COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
KENTON COUNTY
SPENCER COUNTY
TRIGG COUNTY
TRIMBLE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
LETCHER COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
BALLARD COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
WHITLEY COUNTY
JESSAMINE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
WOODFORD COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GREENUP COUNTY
298
272
6
108
26
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/86(R)
09/16/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
03/05/76(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/04/87(R)
12/15/97
10/25/96
05/15/97
05/23/97
02/19/87(R)
05/01/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/18/95(R)
03/02/73(R)
05/28/98
09/04/86(R)
11/19/80(R)
08/19/87(R)
07/02/9 1(R)
04/18/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
11/02/77(R)
06/17/86(R)
12/03/87(R)
01/05/89(R)
08/19/86(R)
10/15/80(R)
01/05/89(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/86(M)
09/16/88
09/04/85(M)
08/03/81
08/19/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
07/17/86(M)
02/02/94
03/02/81
09/27/85(M)
01/16/87
09/01/86(L)
02/06/91
08/16/95
06/04/87(M)
08/26/77
01/14/77
08/01/75
04/01/98(L)
02/19/87
05/01/90(L)
09/01/86(L)
1 1/04/88
07/10/81
09/04/86
09/30/93
08/19/87
(NSFHA)
04/18/83
09/18/85(M)
08/05/86(M)
11/04/88
06/17/86(M)
12/03/87
01/05/89
08/19/86
10/15/80
01/05/89
1 1/05/86
07/03/86
06/01/78
09/30/81
07/17/86(M)
09/30/81
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 13
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
210353#
210106A
210201A
210313#
210229B
210053#
210060#
210030
210336#
210078A
210330#
210338#
210134#
210085A
210289#
210233#
210293#
210296#
210245#
210205#
210260#
210294
210276
210320
210248A
Community Name
"KENTUCKY
ADAIRVILLE, CITY OF
BERRY, CITY OF
BRODHEAD, CITY OF
CALLOW AY COUNTY *
CAMPTON, CITY OF
CASEY COUNTY *
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
FREDONIA, TOWN OF
FULTON COUNTY *
GLENCOE, CITY OF
GRAYSON COUNTY *
HICKMAN COUNTY *
LAUREL COUNTY *
LEITCHFIELD, TOWN OF
LETCHER COUNTY*
MCHENRY, TOWN OF
MUHLENBERG COUNTY
OWSLEY COUNTY*
ROCKPORT, TOWN OF
RUSSELL COUNTY *
SADIEVILLE, CITY OF
SOUTH CARROLLTON, CITY OF
SOUTHGATE, CITY OF
ST. CHARLES, TOWN OF
WHEAT CROFT, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
LOGAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
ROCKCASTLE
COUNTY
CALLOW AY COUNTY
WOLFE COUNTY
CASEY COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
HICKMAN COUNTY
LAUREL COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
LETCHER COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
MUHLENBERG
COUNTY
OWSLEY COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
MUHLENBERG
COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
0
3
0
Hazard Area
Identified
09/08/78
08/16/74
05/17/74
12/02/77
09/18/85(F)
12/13/74
01/03/75
07/25/75
12/23/77
02/01/74
02/1 5/9 1(F)
03/03/78
1 1/02/90(F)
05/10/74
09/02/77
09/29/89(F)
02/06/9 1(F)
08/05/85(F)
09/29/89(F)
09/28/90(F)
02/1 8/8 1(F)
07/25/75
08/01/75
08/13/76
02/15/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/08/79
08/16/75
05/17/75
12/02/78
02/06/91(8)
12/13/75
01/03/76
07/25/76
12/23/78
02/01/75
11/25/78
03/03/79
12/27/75
05/10/75
09/02/78
10/25/75
05/13/78
09/21/98(8)
01/19/95(8)
07/15/78
01/03/76
07/25/76
08/01/76
08/13/77
02/15/75
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 25
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 25
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220264#
220199#
22000 1#
220240#
220114#
220146#
220009#
220207
220029
220166B
220013#
2200 17#
220019#
225193#
220193#
220373#
220065#
220072A
220127#
220026#
220032B
220194#
220360
220232#
220316
220033#
22003 1#
220147
220180#
220102#
22024 1#
220020#
220361#
220037#
220044#
220266A
225194#
220401
220167A
220103#
220047#
220066
220148#
Communities
Community Name
"LOUISIANA
ABBEVILLE, CITY OF
ABITA SPRINGS, TOWN OF
ACADIA PARISH*
ADDIS, TOWN OF
ALBANY, VILLAGE OF
ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF
ALLEN PARISH*
AMITE CITY, TOWN OF
ARCADIA, TOWN OF
ARNAUDVILLE, TOWN OF
ASCENSION PARISH*
ASSUMPTION PARISH*
AVOYELLES PARISH
BAKER, CITY OF
BALDWIN, TOWN OF
BALL, TOWN OF
BASILE, TOWN OF
BASKIN, VILLAGE OF
BASTROP, CITY OF
BEAUREGARD PARISH*
BENTON, TOWN OF
BERWICK, TOWN OF
BIENVILLE PARISH*
BOGALUSA,CITY OF
BONITA, VILLAGE OF
BOSSIER CITY, CITY OF
BOSSIER PARISH*
BOYCE, TOWN OF
BREAUX BRIDGE, TOWN OF
BROUSSARD, TOWN OF
BRUSLY, TOWN OF
BUNKIE, TOWN OF
CADDO PARISH*
CALCASIEU PARISH*
CALDWELL PARISH*
CALVIN, VILLAGE OF
CAMERON PARISH*
CAMPTI, TOWN OF
CANKTON, VILLAGE OF
CARENCRO, TOWN OF
CATAHOULA PARISH*
CHATAIGNIER, VILLAGE OF
CHENEYVILLE, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
VERMILION PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
WEST BATON ROUGE
PAR
LIVINGSTON PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
BIENVILLE PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
ASCENSION PARISH
ASSUMPTION PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
EAST BATON ROUGE
PAR
ST. MARY PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
FRANKLIN PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
BEAUREGARD
PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
ST. MARY PARISH
BIENVILLE PARISH
WASHINGTON
PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
WEST BATON ROUGE
PAR
AVOYELLES PARISH
CADDO PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
CALDWELL PARISH
WINN PARISH
CAMERON PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
CATAHOULA PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/03/81(R)
05/17/88(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/15/77(R)
10/14/83(R)
07/17/78(R)
01/03/90(R)
06/30/76(R)
03/01/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/19/81(R)
02/26/80(R)
10/19/73(R)
12/15/78(R)
07/18/85(R)
01/15/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/03/90(R)
07/26/77(R)
09/03/80(R)
06/24/91
05/04/88(R)
04/03/97
04/04/83(R)
04/18/83(R)
07/09/8 1(R)
03/16/88(R)
03/16/88(R)
08/15/77(R)
11/06/79(R)
09/05/90(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/04/70(R)
08/28/92
06/25/76(R)
11/05/80(R)
04/05/88(R)
04/30/82(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/81
05/17/88
1 1/20/98
09/07/00
12/02/80
09/03/97
01/03/90
(NSFHA)
03/01/86(L)
11/01/85(M)
01/20/93
11/05/97
02/26/80(M)
05/15/85(M)
12/15/78
11/22/99
01/15/88
09/01/86(L)
12/16/80
05/03/90
07/26/77(M)
04/03/95
05/04/88
08/22/75
03/01/84
04/18/83
(NSFHA)
03/16/88
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
11/06/79(M)
04/06/00
06/08/98
04/03/78
07/01/87(L)
05/04/92
(NSFHA)
06/25/76(M)
01/20/99
05/04/00
(NSFHA)
03/02/81
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220002#
220362#
220130#
220054#
220249#
220077#
220399
220045#
220053#
220322B
220021
220153#
220200#
225195#
220235
220038#
220363#
220223#
220155#
220123#
220116#
220027#
2200 14#
220236#
220104#
220058#
220062B
220324A
220096#
220283A
220224#
220004#
220168#
220064#
220325#
220055#
220326#
220285#
220141
220287
22007 IB
220195#
Community Name
CHURCH POINT, TOWN OF
CLAIBORNE PARISH
CLARENCE, VILLAGE OF
CLAYTON, VILLAGE OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
COLFAX, TOWN OF
COLLINSTON, CITY OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
CONCORDIA PARISH*
COTTON VALLEY, TOWN OF
COTTONPORT, TOWN OF
COUSHATTA, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
CROWLEY, CITY OF
CULLEN, TOWN OF
DE QUINCY, CITY OF
DE SOTO PARISH*
DELCAMBRE, TOWN OF
DELHI, TOWN OF
DELTA, VILLAGE OF
DENHAM SPRINGS, CITY OF
DERIDDER, CITY OF
DONALDSONVILLE, CITY OF
DOYLINE, VILLAGE OF
DUSON, TOWN OF
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH
INCLUDES THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE AND
VICINITY
EAST CARROLL PARISH*
ELIZABETH, TOWN OF
ELTON, TOWN OF
EPPS, VILLAGE OF
ERATH, TOWN OF
ESTHERWOOD, VILLAGE OF
EUNICE, CITY OF
EVANGELINE PARISH*
FARMERVILLE, TOWN OF
FERRIDAY, TOWN OF
FLORIEN, VILLAGE OF
FOLSOM, VILLAGE OF
FORDOCHE, VILLAGE OF
FOREST HILL, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN PARISH*
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
County
ACADIA PARISH
CLAIBORNE PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
CONCORDIA PARISH
EAST FELICIANA
PARIS
GRANT PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
CALDWELL PARISH
CONCORDIA PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
RED RIVER PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
DE SOTO PARISH
IBERIA PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
RICHLAND PARISH
MADISON PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
BEAUREGARD
PARISH
ASCENSION PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
EAST BATON ROUGE
PAR
EAST CARROLL
PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
JEFFERSON DAVIS
PARI
WEST CARROLL
PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
UNION PARISH
CONCORDIA PARISH
SABINE PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
POINTE COUPEE
PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
FRANKLIN PARISH
ST. MARY PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/05/80(R)
01/01/92(R)
09/18/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
06/17/91
06/01/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/19/76(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
11/19/80(R)
06/30/72(R)
02/12/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
05/01/87(R)
04/04/83(R)
01/08/80(R)
09/25/79(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/19/82(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/18/79(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/02/79(R)
11/15/85(R)
02/01/87(R)
02/03/82(R)
07/28/95
04/04/83(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/01/88(R)
03/23/82(R)
12/15/77(R)
07/14/89(R)
03/16/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
07/24/8 1(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/05/80
01/01/92(L)
09/18/87
01/31/80
12/04/79
11/16/95
06/01/78
06/02/94
10/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
11/19/80
07/27/82
(NSFHA)
04/02/79
05/01/87(L)
04/04/83
03/09/99
09/25/79(M)
10/15/81
10/16/92
05/15/80
09/18/79(M)
01/20/99
05/17/93
11/15/85(M)
02/01/87(L)
02/03/82
05/29/79
04/04/83
02/04/81
06/01/81
10/20/98
1 1/22/99
12/15/77
08/05/91
03/16/82(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/01/85(M)
04/15/92
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220233#
220117#
220073#
220149#
225196B
220290#
220015#
220162B
22029 1#
220169B
225197#
220076#
220329
220330#
220292#
225198#
220084#
220225
220208#
225200#
220048#
220034#
22005 1#
220189#
220294
220052#
220332
220220#
220078#
220083#
220209B
220005B
220039#
220333#
220371#
220080#
220095#
225199#
220334A
220098#
220252#
220049#
220226#
225201#
220210#
220355A
220010C
220170#
220101#
220105#
225202#
Community Name
FRANKLINTON, TOWN OF
FRENCH SETTLEMENT, VILLAGE OF
GILBERT, VILLAGE OF
GLENMORA, TOWN OF
GOLDEN MEADOW, TOWN OF
GOLDONNA, VILLAGE OF
GONZALES, CITY OF
GRAMERCY, TOWN OF
GRAND CANE, VILLAGE OF
GRAND COTEAU, TOWN OF
GRAND ISLE, TOWN OF
GRANT PARISH*
GRAYSON, VILLAGE OF
GREENSBURG, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD, TOWN OF
GRETNA, CITY OF
GROSSE TETE, VILLAGE OF
GUEYDAN, TOWN OF
HAMMOND, CITY OF
HARAHAN, CITY OF
HARRISONBURG, VILLAGE OF
HAUGHTON, TOWN OF
HAYNESVILLE, TOWN OF
HENDERSON, TOWN OF
HESSMER, VILLAGE OF
HOMER, TOWN OF
HORNBECK, VILLAGE OF
HOUMA, CITY OF
IBERIA PARISH*
IBERVILLE PARISH*
INDEPENDENCE, TOWN OF
IOTA, TOWN OF
IOWA, TOWN OF
JACKSON, TOWN OF
JEAN LAFITTE, TOWN OF
JEANERETTE, CITY OF
JEFFERSON DAVIS PARISH*
JEFFERSON PARISH*
JENA, TOWN OF
JENNINGS, CITY OF
JONESBORO, TOWN OF
JONESVILLE, TOWN OF
KAPLAN, CITY OF
KENNER, CITY OF
KENTWOOD, TOWN OF
KILLIAN, VILLAGE OF
KINDER, TOWN OF
KROTZ SPRINGS, TOWN OF
LAFAYETTE PARISH*
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAFOURCHE PARISH*
County
WASHINGTON
PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
FRANKLIN PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
LAFOURCHE PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
ASCENSION PARISH
ST. JAMES PARISH
DE SOTO PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
JEFFERSON PARISH
GRANT PARISH
CALDWELL PARISH
ST. HELENA PARISH
CADDO PARISH
JEFFERSON PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
JEFFERSON PARISH
CATAHOULA PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
CLAIBORNE PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
CLAIBORNE PARISH
VERNON PARISH
TERREBONNE PARISH
IBERIA PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
EAST FELICIANA
PARIS
JEFFERSON PARISH
IBERIA PARISH
JEFFERSON DAVIS
PARI
JEFFERSON PARISH
LA SALLE PARISH
JEFFERSON DAVIS
PARI
JACKSON PARISH
CATAHOULA PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
JEFFERSON PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
LAFOURCHE PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/28/79(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/03/82(R)
1 1/20/70(R)
06/29/82(R)
08/16/82(R)
01/24/78(R)
03/23/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/30/70(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/09/8 1(R)
04/01/80(R)
10/14/91
06/1 8/7 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/16/77(R)
12/15/81(R)
06/15/73(R)
04/05/88(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
03/30/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
01/27/97
09/03/80(R)
05/08/01
05/19/81(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
07/05/77(R)
07/18/85(R)
02/04/88(R)
06/04/80(R)
10/01/71(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/15/88(R)
10/01/71(R)
03/01/87(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/01/78(R)
03/01/82(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/15/88(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
04/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/28/79
10/15/85(M)
09/03/80
02/03/82
07/11/75
06/29/82(M)
08/18/92
01/24/78(M)
03/23/82(M)
06/30/76(M)
03/23/95
11/16/95
(NSFHA)
04/01/80
04/06/00
03/23/95
03/01/78
(NSFHA)
07/21/99
03/23/95
04/05/88
09/30/81
03/30/82(M)
05/03/82
09/03/80
08/15/75
05/19/81
06/30/99
08/05/91
07/05/77(M)
07/18/85(M)
12/15/90
06/04/80
03/23/95
04/17/79(M)
06/15/88
03/23/95
03/01/87(L)
04/15/81
10/15/85(M)
03/01/78
03/01/82
03/23/95
04/15/80
08/01/87(L)
11/01/85(M)
01/15/88
01/20/99
01/20/99
05/04/92
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220099#
220040#
220063#
220112B
220150#
220229#
220171A
220366#
220113#
220118
220142
220254#
220336#
220081
220248#
220122#
22020 1#
220067C
220202#
220156#
220337#
220255A
220158#
220085
220022#
220372
220227
220299#
220172#
220128B
220006#
220028A
220237#
220136#
220256#
220300#
220023B
220367#
220196#
220143
220007#
220124A
220018
220370#
220129#
220131#
220082#
Community Name
LAKE ARTHUR, TOWN OF
LAKE CHARLES, CITY OF
LAKE PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF
LASALLE PARISH*
LECOMPTE, TOWN OF
LEESVILLE, CITY OF
LEONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LINCOLN PARISH*
LIVINGSTON PARISH*
LIVINGSTON, TOWN OF
LIVONIA, TOWN OF
LOCKPORT, TOWN OF
LOGANSPORT, TOWN OF
LOREAUVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LUTCHER, TOWN OF
MADISON PARISH*
MADISONVILLE, TOWN OF
MAMOU, TOWN OF
MANDEVILLE, TOWN OF
MANGHAM, TOWN OF
MANSFIELD, CITY OF
MANSURA, TOWN OF
MANY, TOWN OF
MARINGOUIN, TOWN OF
MARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
MARTIN, VILLAGE OF
MAURICE, VILLAGE OF
MCNARY, VILLAGE OF
MELVILLE, TOWN OF
MER ROUGE, VILLAGE OF
MERMENTAU, VILLAGE OF
MERRYVILLE, TOWN OF
MINDEN, CITY OF
MONROE, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWN OF
MONTPELIER, VILLAGE OF
MOREAUVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MOREHOUSE PARISH*
MORGAN CITY, CITY OF
MORGANZA, VILLAGE OF
MORSE, VILLAGE OF
MOUND, VILLAGE OF
NAPOLEONVILLE, TOWN OF
NATCHEZ, VILLAGE OF
NATCHITOCHES PARISH*
NATCHITOCHES, CITY OF
NEW IBERIA, CITY OF
County
JEFFERSON DAVIS
PARI
CALCASIEU PARISH
EAST CARROLL
PARISH
LA SALLE PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
VERNON PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
LINCOLN PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
POINTE COUPEE
PARISH
LAFOURCHE PARISH
DE SOTO PARISH
IBERIA PARISH
ST. JAMES PARISH
MADISON PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
RICHLAND PARISH
DE SOTO PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
SABINE PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
RED RIVER PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
BEAUREGARD
PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
OUACHITA PARISH
GRANT PARISH
ST. HELENA PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
ST. MARY PARISH
POINTE COUPEE
PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
MADISON PARISH
ASSUMPTION PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
IBERIA PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/1 5/8 1(R)
10/16/79(R)
10/16/79(R)
11/01/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
01/17/86(R)
1 1/09/82(R)
03/01/91(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/15/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/15/80(R)
01/01/92(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/24/79(R)
03/04/88(R)
12/02/80(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
10/09/79(R)
07/04/88(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/15/88(R)
09/01/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/09/8 1(R)
06/30/76(R)
07/24/8 1(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/27/78(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
02/01/87(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/04/82(R)
03/20/79(R)
01/31/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/15/78(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
07/12/77(R)
06/20/76(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
08/22/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/81
07/03/97
10/16/79(M)
11/01/85(M)
06/02/99
06/02/95
1 1/09/82(M)
11/22/99
09/30/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/15/80
01/01/92(L)
(NSFHA)
04/24/79(M)
03/04/88
03/16/83
11/01/85(M)
04/04/83
10/09/79(M)
07/04/88
06/25/76(M)
08/05/91
(NSFHA)
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
06/30/76(M)
07/13/82(M)
07/03/78
06/27/78(M)
03/02/81
02/01/87(L)
03/03/92
03/15/94
05/04/82(M)
03/20/79(M)
01/31/78(M)
10/15/85(M)
05/20/96
(NSFHA)
04/15/81
07/12/77(M)
(NSFHA)
12/08/98
12/08/98
09/18/87
07/13/82(M)
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220340A
225203#
220144#
220216#
220342
220303
22001 IB
220012B
220343
220173#
220135#
220174B
220190#
220197#
220203#
220068B
220151#
220244
220035#
220086
220139#
220024#
220140#
220305#
22021 1#
220242#
220175#
220119#
220132B
220145#
220008#
220157#
220152B
220154C
220125#
220378#
220056#
220030B
220133#
220308
220087#
220212A
220346B
220347#
220368#
220106#
220036#
Community Name
NEW LLANO, VILLAGE OF
NEW ORLEANS/ORLEANS PARISH
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS & ORLEANS PARISH
NEW ROADS, TOWN OF
NEWELLTON, TOWN OF
OAK GROVE, TOWN OF
OAK RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
OAKDALE, CITY OF
OBERLIN, TOWN OF
OLLA, TOWN OF
OPELOUSAS, CITY OF
OUACHITA PARISH*
PALMETTO, VILLAGE OF
PARKS, VILLAGE OF
PATTERSON, CITY OF
PEARL RIVER, TOWN OF
PINE PRAIRIE, VILLAGE OF
PINEVILLE, CITY OF
PIONEER, VILLAGE OF
PLAIN DEALING, TOWN OF
PLAQUEMINE, CITY OF
PLAQUEMINES PARISH*
PLAUCHEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
POINTE COUPEE PARISH*
POLLOCK, TOWN OF
PONCHATOULA, TOWN OF
PORT ALLEN, CITY OF
PORT BARRE, TOWN OF
PORT VINCENT, VILLAGE OF
PROVENCAL, VILLAGE OF
RAPIDES PARISH*
RAYNE, CITY OF
RAYVILLE, TOWN OF
RED RIVER PARISH*
RICHLAND PARISH*
RICHMOND, VILLAGE OF
RICHWOOD, TOWN OF
RIDGECREST, TOWN OF
RINGGOLD, TOWN OF
ROBELINE, VILLAGE OF
RODESSA, VILLAGE OF
ROSEDALE, VILLAGE OF
ROSELAND, TOWN OF
ROSEPINE, VILLAGE OF
RUSTON, CITY OF
SABINE PARISH*
SCOTT, CITY OF
SHREVEPORT, CITY OF
County
VERNON PARISH
ORLEANS PARISH
POINTE COUPEE
PARISH
TENSAS PARISH
WEST CARROLL
PARISH
MOREHOUSE PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
LA SALLE PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
OUACHITA PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
ST. MARY PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
WEST CARROLL
PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
PLAQUEMINES
PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
POINTE COUPEE
PARISH
GRANT PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
WEST BATON ROUGE
PAR
ST. LANDRY PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
ACADIA PARISH
RICHLAND PARISH
RED RIVER PARISH
RICHLAND PARISH
MADISON PARISH
OUACHITA PARISH
CONCORDIA PARISH
BIENVILLE PARISH
NATCHITOCHES
PARISH
CADDO PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
VERNON PARISH
LINCOLN PARISH
SABINE PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
BOSSIER PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/18/85(R)
08/03/70(R)
04/15/80(R)
03/16/82(R)
08/18/97(R)
03/27/97(R)
08/05/85(R)
10/12/82(R)
08/08/79(R)
08/03/81(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/15/86(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/03/78(R)
05/04/88(R)
06/25/76(R)
09/05/84(R)
07/11/97(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/26/77(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/11/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/25/82(R)
04/17/79(R)
01/24/78(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/16/88(R)
11/01/92(R)
09/05/84(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/03/80(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/30/87(R)
04/03/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
08/26/77(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
10/19/82(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/05/91(R)
04/04/83(R)
01/18/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/18/85(M)
03/01/84
11/16/95
03/16/82(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/05/85(M)
10/12/82(M)
(NSFHA)
08/03/81
03/15/94
04/15/86(M)
07/16/80
05/02/95
05/04/88
06/25/76(M)
09/05/84
04/15/81
(NSFHA)
09/30/93
09/11/79(M)
11/16/95
05/25/82(M)
07/21/99
09/07/00
04/15/81
08/16/88
11/01/92(L)
06/02/99
12/14/82
09/03/80
05/15/85(M)
12/08/98
07/16/80
03/15/94
04/03/78
10/15/85(M)
10/06/98
(NSFHA)
02/26/80
09/01/87(L)
10/19/82(M)
01/19/96
08/05/91
01/20/99
04/06/00
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220258A
220025#
220204#
220016#
220313A
220120
220238#
225204#
220160#
220246#
220161#
22026 1#
220164#
220217
220165#
220178#
220191#
220192#
225205#
220400#
22004 1#
220176#
220126#
220206#
220213#
220215#
225206#
220111#
2202 14#
220359#
220234#
22022 1#
220228#
220057#
220070#
220042#
220121#
220230#
220177B
220218C
220357#
220100#
220239#
220243A
Community Name
SIBLEY, VILLAGE OF
SIMMESPORT, TOWN OF
SLIDELL, CITY OF
SORRENTO, TOWN OF
SOUTH MANSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
SPRINGHILL, CITY OF
ST. BERNARD PARISH*
ST. CHARLES PARISH*
ST. FRANCISVILLE, TOWN OF
ST. HELENA PARISH*
ST. JAMES PARISH*
ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH*
ST. JOSEPH, TOWN OF
ST. LANDRY PARISH *
ST. MARTIN PARISH *
ST. MARTINVILLE, CITY OF
ST. MARY PARISH*
ST. TAMMANY PARISH*
STERLINGTON, TOWN OF
SULPHUR, CITY OF
SUNSET, TOWN OF
TALLULAH, CITY OF
TANGIPAHOA PARISH*
TANGIPAHOA, VILLAGE OF
TENSAS PARISH*
TERREBONNE PARISH*
THIBODAUX, CITY OF
TICKFAW, CITY OF
UNION PARISH*
VARNADO, VILLAGE OF
VERMILION PARISH*
VERNON PARISH*
VIDALIA, TOWN OF
VILLE PLATTE, TOWN OF
VINTON, TOWN OF
WALKER, TOWN OF
Town of Walker completely annexed Village of Corbin, LA.
CIS changes to reflect Town of Corbin as defunct on
04-11-2000.
WASHINGTON PARISH*
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WATERPROOF, TOWN OF
WEBSTER PARISH*
WELSH, TOWN OF
WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH*
WEST CARROLL PARISH*
County
CADDO PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
AVOYELLES PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
ASCENSION PARISH
DE SOTO PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
ST. BERNARD PARISH
ST. CHARLES PARISH
WEST FELICIANA
PARIS
ST. HELENA PARISH
ST. JAMES PARISH
ST. JOHN THE
BAPTIST
TENSAS PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
ST. MARTIN PARISH
ST. MARY PARISH
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
OUACHITA PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
MADISON PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
TENSAS PARISH
TERREBONNE PARISH
LAFOURCHE PARISH
TANGIPAHOA PARISH
UNION PARISH
WASHINGTON
PARISH
VERMILION PARISH
VERNON PARISH
CONCORDIA PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
LIVINGSTON PARISH
WASHINGTON
PARISH
ST. LANDRY PARISH
TENSAS PARISH
WEBSTER PARISH
JEFFERSON DAVIS
PAR.
WEST BATON ROUGE
PAR
WEST CARROLL
PARISH
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/18/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
12/16/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
02/01/87(R)
03/24/98(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/13/70(R)
05/02/83(R)
05/02/77(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/13/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/26/77(R)
05/03/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
06/14/94(R)
08/16/88(R)
03/30/82(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/02/83(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/03/78(R)
11/20/70(R)
02/07/78(R)
06/28/77(R)
03/01/87(R)
04/05/89(R)
05/15/85(R)
03/01/87(R)
06/15/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/04/88(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/21/77(R)
07/15/88(R)
07/16/81(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/18/85(M)
07/16/80
04/21/99
12/28/82
02/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
06/15/81
06/30/99
06/16/92
05/02/77
09/27/91
07/13/82(M)
02/02/83
(NSFHA)
10/16/91
12/19/97
12/16/80
06/30/99
04/21/99
03/15/94
09/21/98
03/30/82(M)
08/19/86
08/23/00
09/28/79
04/03/78
04/02/92
12/15/89
08/23/00
11/22/99
02/17/89
05/04/92
03/01/87(L)
01/05/82
10/20/98
07/16/81
02/17/82
05/04/88
05/01/85(M)
ll/27/79(M)
07/15/88
07/16/81
09/07/00
03/01/87(L)
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
220245#
220138#
220043#
220094#
220088
220369#
220247A
220074#
220075#
220260#
220358#
22006 1#
220353#
Community Name
WEST FELICIANA PARISH*
WEST MONROE, CITY OF
WESTLAKE, CITY OF
WESTWEGO, CITY OF
WHITE CASTLE, TOWN OF
WINN PARISH *
WINNFIELD, CITY OF
WINNSBORO, TOWN OF
WISNER, TOWN OF
WOODWORTH, VILLAGE OF
YOUNGSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ZACHARY, CITY OF
ZWOLLE, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
County
WEST FELICIANA
PARIS
OUACHITA PARISH
CALCASIEU PARISH
JEFFERSON PARISH
IBERVILLE PARISH
WINN PARISH
WINN PARISH
FRANKLIN PARISH
FRANKLIN PARISH
RAPIDES PARISH
LAFAYETTE PARISH
EAST BATON ROUGE
PAR
SABINE PARISH
287
279
25
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/13/79(R)
12/01/78(R)
02/03/82(R)
12/28/76(R)
12/16/77(R)
07/24/89(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/01/78(R)
07/16/80(R)
10/25/79(R)
03/30/82(R)
09/15/77(R)
07/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/13/79(M)
03/15/94
02/03/82
03/23/95
(NSFHA)
07/24/89(L)
07/01/87(L)
09/01/78
07/16/80
01/07/98
01/20/99
08/03/82
08/05/91
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
73
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
220231
220354
220374#
220318
220320
220323A
220331
220335
220390#
220339#
220262#
220307
220309
220259
220205A
220069A
220397#
Community Name
"LOUISIANA
ANGIE, VILLAGE OF
ATHENS, VILLAGE OF
BELCHER, VILLAGE OF
CHATHAM, TOWN OF
CLARKS, VILLAGE OF
DUBACH, TOWN OF
HODGE, VILLAGE OF
JUNCTION CITY, VILLAGE OF
LILLIE, VILLAGE OF
MOORINGSPORT, TOWN OF
OIL CITY, TOWN OF
REEVES, VILLAGE OF
SALINE, VILLAGE OF
SLAUGHTER, TOWN OF
SUN, VILLAGE OF
TURKEY CREEK, VILLAGE OF
URANIA, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
WASHINGTON
PARISH
CLAIBORNE PARISH
CADDO PARISH
JACKSON PARISH
CALDWELL PARISH
LINCOLN PARISH
JACKSON PARISH
CLAIBORNE PARISH
UNION PARISH
UNION PARISH
CADDO PARISH
CADDO PARISH
ALLEN PARISH
BIENVILLE PARISH
EAST FELICIANA
PARIS
ST. TAMMANY
PARISH
EVANGELINE PARISH
LA SALLE PARISH
0
1
0
Hazard Area
Identified
01/03/75
02/21/75
04/06/00(F)
09/19/75(F)
08/15/75
04/01/77
07/11/75
07/18/75
04/03/79
04/06/00(F)
07/16/80(F)
08/15/75
06/25/76
09/19/75
08/30/74
08/30/74
04/03/79
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/03/76
02/21/76
06/27/79
09/19/76
08/15/76
04/01/78
07/11/76
07/18/76
04/03/80
06/25/77
05/04/88(8)
08/15/76
06/25/77
09/19/76
08/30/75
08/30/75
04/03/80
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 17
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 17
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230406#
230190#
230688
230132#
230606
230231 A
230713
230852
230303B
230191#
230440A
230101A
230418A
230689
230690
230160#
230967#
230123#
230714
230073B
230464A
230208#
230192#
230012#
230715
230001#
230067#
230345A
230304#
231011
230716
230717
230200#
230102#
230064#
231000
230974
230916
230468#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"MAINE
ABBOT, TOWN OF
ACTON, TOWN OF
ADAMSTOWN T04 R02 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
ADDISON, TOWN OF
ALBANY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALBION, TOWN OF
ALDER BROOK T3 R3 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
ALDER STREAM T02 R08 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
ALEXANDER, TOWN OF
ALFRED, TOWN OF
ALLAGASH, TOWN OF
FORMERLY ALLAGASH PLANTATION
ALTON, TOWN OF
AMITY, TOWN OF
ANDOVER NORTH SURPLUS, TOWNSHIP OF
ANDOVER WEST SURPLUS, TOWNSHIP OF
ANDOVER, TOWN OF
ANDREWS ISLAND
ANSON, TOWN OF
APPLETON T6 R7 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
APPLETON, TOWN OF
ARGYLE, TOWNSHIP OF
ARROWSIC, TOWN OF
ARUNDEL, TOWN OF
ASHLAND, TOWN OF
ATTEAN T5 Rl NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUGUSTA, CITY OF
AVON, TOWN OF
BAILEYVILLE, TOWN OF
BALD ISLAND
BALD MOUNTAIN T2 R3 BKP EKR, TOWNSHIP OF
BALD MOUNTAIN T4 R3 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
BALDWIN, TOWN OF
BANGOR, CITY OF
BAR HARBOR, TOWN OF
BAR ISLAND
BAR ISLAND
BAR ISLAND
BARING PLANTATION
in the National Flood Program
County
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/15/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/16/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/15/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/15/91(R)
04/01/87(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/06/01
04/15/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/14/80(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/02/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/15/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/93
06/05/85
(NSFHA)
07/16/91
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
05/18/98
08/05/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/03/85
02/23/01
07/03/95
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
05/15/91
06/04/96
11/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
10/18/95
06/15/94
01/14/77
04/15/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/02/80
06/15/78
05/02/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/15/82
Page Iof26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230480
231016
230459
230118#
231025
230133#
231019
230853
230488
230129#
230232#
230420A
230233#
230144#
230088#
230145#
230545
230483
230719
230518
230546
230718
230124B
230997
230966
230013B
230720
230510
230274#
230213#
230212#
230635
230484
230119#
230691
230721
231005
230373A
230103#
230722
230723
230214B
230104#
230421A
Community Name
BARNARD PLANTATION
BARRED ISLAND
BATCHELDERS GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
BATH, CITY OF
BEACH ISLAND
BEALS, TOWN OF
BEAR ISLAND
BEATTIE T02 RO8 WKBP, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER COVE, TOWN OF
BELFAST, CITY OF
BELGRADE, TOWN OF
BENEDICT A, TOWN OF
BENTON, TOWN OF
BERWICK, TOWN OF
BETHEL, TOWN OF
BIDDEFORD, CITY OF
BIG SIX T6 R19 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
BIG SQUAW T2 R6 BKP EKR, TOWNSHIP OF
BIG TEN T10 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
BIG TWENTY, T20 Rl 1 & 12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
BIG W, TOWNSHIP OF
BIGELOW T4 R3 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
BINGHAM, TOWN OF
BIRCH ISLAND
BIRCH ISLAND
ELAINE, TOWN OF
BLAKE GORE T5 R4 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
BLANCHARD PLANTATION
BLUE HILL, TOWN OF
BOOTHBAY HARBOR, TOWN OF
BOOTHBAY, TOWN OF
BOWDOIN COLLEGE GRANT E. T7 RIO NWP, TWP.
BOWDOIN COLLEGE GRANT W. T8
BOWDOINHAM,TOWN OF
BOWMANTOWN T04 R06 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
BOWTOWN Tl R4 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADBURY ISLAND
BRADFORD, TOWN OF
BRADLEY, TOWN OF
BRADSTREET T4 R7 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
BRASSUA T2 R2 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
BREMEN, TOWN OF
BREWER, CITY OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
County
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/03/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
01/17/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/15/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/16/87(R)
05/03/90(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/04/88(R)
08/05/91(R)
05/02/91(R)
05/15/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/03/90(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/04/78(R)
05/01/78(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/17/86
(NSFHA)
05/15/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
01/16/87
09/18/85(M)
05/07/01
08/05/91
06/19/97
05/15/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
06/17/86
06/03/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/19/97
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/04/78(M)
05/01/78
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/04/87(M)
06/01/78
09/18/85(M)
Page 2 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230041#
230947
230538
230215#
230275A
230253A
230276#
230470A
230089#
230161#
230042#
230090#
230065#
230130#
231015
230146#
230330A
230692
230134#
230355B
230074#
230945
230962
230356B
230091#
230043#
230539#
230014#
230056#
230461A
230753
230724
230339A
230441A
230044#
230277#
230422A
230442
230584
231029
230015A
230437
230547
230234#
Community Name
BRIDGTON, TOWN OF
BRIG LEDGE ISLAND
BRIGHTON PLANTATION
BRISTOL, TOWN OF
BROOKLIN,TOWN OF
BROOKS, TOWN OF
BROOKSVILLE, TOWN OF
BROOKTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BROWNFIELD, TOWN OF
BROWNVILLE, TOWN OF
BRUNSWICK, TOWN OF
BUCKFIELD, TOWN OF
BUCKSPORT, TOWN OF
BURNHAM, TOWN OF
BUTTER ISLAND
BUXTON, TOWN OF
BYRON, TOWN OF
C SURPLUS, TOWNSHIP OF
CALAIS, CITY OF
CAMBRIDGE, TOWN OF
CAMDEN, TOWN OF
CAMP COVE LEDGE ISLAND
CAMP ISLAND
CANAAN, TOWN OF
CANTON, TOWN OF
CAPE ELIZABETH, TOWN OF
CARATUNK, TOWN OF
CARIBOU, CITY OF
CARRABASSETT VALLEY, TOWN OF
CARROLL PLANTATION
CARRYING PLACE T01 R03 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
CARRYING PLACE T02 R03 BKP WKR, TWP. OF
CARTHAGE, TOWN OF
CARY PLANTATION
CASCO, TOWN OF
CASTINE, TOWN OF
CASTLE HILL, TOWN OF
CASWELL, TOWN OF
CHAIN OF PONDS, TOWNSHIP OF
CHANNEL ROCK ISLAND
CHAPMAN, TOWN OF
CHARLOTTE, TOWN OF
CHASE STREAM Tl R6 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
CHELSEA, TOWN OF
County
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/03/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/19/89(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/15/91(R)
11/01/85(R)
04/01/81(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
11/04/88(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/03/94(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/04/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
1 1/03/89(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/03/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
05/05/81(R)
05/02/91(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/29/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/01/00
04/30/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/19/89
03/01/87(L)
09/18/85(M)
05/15/91
11/01/85(M)
04/01/81
11/01/85(M)
01/03/86
09/03/92
11/04/88
06/03/91
(NSFHA)
07/05/82
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/03/94
09/27/85(M)
05/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
1 1/03/89
07/15/92
11/01/85(M)
08/01/80
12/05/90
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
02/01/85(M)
05/05/81
05/02/91
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
12/17/76
(NSFHA)
06/15/94
Page 3 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230135#
230377A
230346A
230485
230235#
230970
230378#
230236#
230585
230568
231027
231022
230725
230466A
230451 A
230581
230397A
230380A
230147#
230358A
230636
230765
230278#
230955
231034
231006
230978
230423B
230162#
230443A
230854
230455#
230216#
230136B
230855
230486
230148#
230726
230280#
230476#
230540
230312A
230357A
230819
Community Name
CHERRYFIELD, TOWN OF
CHESTER,TOWN OF
CHESTERVILLE, TOWN OF
CHESUNCOOK T5 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
CHINA, TOWN OF
CLAM LEDGES ISLAND
CLIFTON, TOWN OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
COBURN GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
CODYVILLE PLANTATION
COLTHEAD ISLAND
COMPASS ISLAND
COMSTOCK T04 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
CONCORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CONNOR, TOWNSHIP OF
COPLIN PLANTATION
CORINNA, TOWN OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
CORNISH, TOWN OF
CORNVILLE, TOWN OF
COVE POINT, TOWNSHIP OF
COX PATENT, TOWNSHIP OF
CRANBERRY ISLES, TOWN OF
CRESCENT ISLAND
CRIEHAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF
CROW ISLAND
CROW ISLAND
CRYSTAL, TOWN OF
CUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
CYR PLANTATION
D, TOWNSHIP OF
DALLAS PLANTATION
DAMARISCOTTA, TOWN OF
DANFORTH, TOWN OF
DAVIS T03 R03 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
DAYS ACADEMY GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
DAYTON, TOWN OF
DEAD RIVER T03 R03 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
DEER ISLE, TOWN OF
DENMARK, TOWN OF
DENNISTOWN PLANTATION
DENNYSVILLE, TOWN OF
DETROIT, TOWN OF
DEVEREAUX T29 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/04/88(R)
02/04/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/05/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/02/94(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/01/85(R)
01/17/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/01/91(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/17/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/19/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/28/98(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/02/91(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/02/90
02/04/87(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/05/89
(NSFHA)
05/02/94
05/03/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/01/85
01/17/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
07/01/91(L)
03/18/80
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/15/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
07/15/92
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/23/00
09/30/88
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/01/81
(NSFHA)
05/02/91
07/02/80
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
Page 4 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230105#
230965
230092#
230381A
230727
230116#
230084#
230479
230766
230002#
230820
230514
230586
231008
230637
230016B
230990
230313A
230638
230163B
230548
230017C
230137#
231001
230382#
230217#
230383
230471A
230991
230149#
230481
230066#
230728
230359B
230384#
230385
230347B
230125#
230045#
230164#
230057#
230237
230953
Community Name
DEXTER, TOWN OF
DIX ISLAND
DIXFIELD, TOWN OF
DIXMONT,TOWN OF
DOLE BROOK T03 R05 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
DOVER-FOXCROFT, TOWN OF
DRESDEN, TOWN OF
DREW PLANTATION
DUDLEY T07 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
DURHAM, TOWN OF
DYER T01 R02 TS, TOWNSHIP OF
E PLANTATION
E, TOWNSHIP OF
EAGLE ISLAND
EAGLE LAKE T08 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
EAGLE LAKE, TOWN OF
EAST GOOSE ROCKS
EAST MACHIAS, TOWN OF
EAST MIDDLESEX CANAL GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST MILLINOCKET,TOWN OF
EAST MOXIE T02 R04 BKPEKR, TOWNSHIP OF
EASTON, TOWN OF
EASTPORT, CITY OF
EATON ISLAND
EDDINGTON, TOWN OF
EDGECOMB, TOWN OF
EDINBURG, TOWN OF
EDMUNDS, TOWNSHIP OF
EGG ROCK ISLAND
ELIOT, TOWN OF
ELLIOTTSVILLE TOWNSHIP
ELLSWORTH, CITY OF
ELM STREAM T04 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
EMBDEN, TOWN OF
ENFIELD, TOWN OF
ETNA, TOWN OF
EUSTIS, TOWN OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FALMOUTH, TOWN OF
FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON, TOWN OF
FAYETTE, TOWN OF
FISHERMAN'S ISLAND
County
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/04/85(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/04/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/03/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/05/97
05/31/94
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/05/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/04/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/15/91(R)
04/09/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/17/88(R)
10/16/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
02/03/00
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/90
(NSFHA)
09/04/85
02/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
04/02/93
07/06/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
12/03/87
(NSFHA)
07/03/78
07/18/78
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/05/89
11/04/88
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
05/15/91
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
02/17/88
10/16/84
05/02/94
07/03/95
1 1/29/74
(NSFHA)
Page 5 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230972
230729
231012
230572
230571
230519
230730
230018#
230019#
230821
230254#
230255A
230457A
230046#
230594#
230487
230165B
230225#
231036
230093#
230068#
230444A
230387B
230209#
230106#
230515
230987
230959
230856
230047#
230283#
230975
230607
230608
230167B
230469A
231017
Community Name
FLAG ISLAND
FLAGSTAFF T04 R04 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
FLING ISLAND
FOREST CITY T9 R4 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
FOREST T10 R3 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
FORKSTOWN, T3 R2 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
FORSYTH T06 R02 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
FORT F AIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FORT KENT, TOWN OF
FOWLER T01 R01 TS, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKFORT, TOWN OF
FREEDOM, TOWN OF
FREEMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
FREEPORT, TOWN OF
FRENCHBORO, TOWN OF
FORMERLY LONG ISLAND PLANTATION
FRENCHTOWN TA R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Includes the Township of Kokadjo Tol R12 Wels
FRENCHVILLE, TOWN OF
FRIENDSHIP, TOWN OF
FRYE ISLAND, TOWN OF
USE TOWN OF STANDISH (CID 230207) FIRM DATED
10/16/84, PANELS 10 & 15.
FRYEBURG, TOWN OF
GARDINER, CITY OF
GARFIELD PLANTATION
GARLAND, TOWN OF
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GLENBURN, TOWN OF
GLENWOOD PLANTATION
GOOSE ISLAND
GOOSEBERRY-NUB ISLAND
GORHAM GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
GORHAM, TOWN OF
GOULDSBORO,TOWN OF
GRAFFAM ISLAND
GRAFTON TA2, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAND FALLS PLANTATION
GRAND ISLE, TOWN OF
GRAND LAKE STREAM PLANTATION
GRASS LEDGE ISLAND
County
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/17/90(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/17/85(R)
04/17/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
05/08/01(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/17/88(R)
08/05/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
06/04/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/01/80
02/15/84
(NSFHA)
05/17/90
09/27/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
01/17/85
04/17/87(M)
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
07/16/90
08/14/81
07/18/94
08/19/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
07/15/92
08/16/93
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/15/81
06/04/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
08/05/85(M)
(NSFHA)
Page 6 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230048#
230961
230596
231018
230944
230107#
230475#
230388
230409#
230332A
230612
230117#
230918
230069#
230445A
230731
230516
230168#
230284#
230333A
230951
231007
230639
230360B
230169#
230314C
230049#
230334#
230361A
230020B
230335B
230389A
230937
230613
230971
230712
230964
230946
230541
230094#
230732
230426A
230994
230934
Community Name
GRAY, TOWN OF
GREAT POND ISLAND
GREAT POND, TOWN OF
FORMERLY PLANTATION NO. 33
GREAT SPRUCE HEAD ISLAND
GREEN LEDGE ISLAND
GREENBUSH, TOWN OF
GREENE, TOWN OF
GREENFIELD, TOWN OF
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENWOOD, TOWN OF
GRINDSTONE Tl R7 WELS
GUILFORD, TOWN OF
HADDOCK ISLAND
HALLOWELL, CITY OF
HAMLIN, TOWN OF
HAMMOND T03 R04 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMMOND, TOWN OF
HAMPDEN, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HANOVER, TOWN OF
HARBOR LEDGES ISLAND
HARDHEAD ISLAND
HARFORDS POINT, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMONY, TOWN OF
HARPSWELL, TOWN OF
HARRINGTON, TOWN OF
HARRISON, TOWN OF
HARTFORD, TOWN OF
HARTLAND, TOWN OF
HAYNESVILLE, TOWN OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
HERMON, TOWN OF
HERRING LEDGE ISLAND
HERSEYTOWN T2 R6 WELS
HEWETT ISLAND
HIBBERTS GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGH ISLAND
HIGH LEDGE ISLAND
HIGHLAND PLANTATION
HIRAM, TOWN OF
HOBBSTOWN T04 R06 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
HODGDON, TOWN OF
HOG ISLAND
HOG ISLAND
County
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/06/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
05/03/90(R)
10/27/93
03/04/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/09/85(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/15/82(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/01/91(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/31/76(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/01/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/06/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/87
05/03/90
02/21/75
09/03/92
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/16/93
(NSFHA)
07/18/94
08/05/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/87
06/03/91
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
07/20/98
07/15/92
04/15/82
07/05/94
01/01/91(L)
09/18/85(M)
12/31/76(M)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/01/80
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 7 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230390#
230733
230150#
230836
230837
231024
230021#
230391#
230392#
230917
230919
230614
230615
230549
230348A
231009
230022#
230256#
230362B
230257
230349#
230085#
230587
230550
230925
230138#
230489
230108B
230151#
230170#
230857
230927
230640
230734
230058#
230474A
230482
230171#
230573
230513
230609
230472A
Community Name
HOLDEN, TOWN OF
HOLEB T06 R01 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
HOLLIS, TOWN OF
HOPKINS ACADEMY GRANT , TOWNSHIP OF
THE TOWNSHIPS OF HOPKINS ACADEMY GRANT
EAST AND HOPKINS ACADEMY GRANT WEST HAVE
MERGED INTO ONE COMMUNITY, THE TOWNSHIP OF
HOPKINS ACADEMY GRANT . THE
CID FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOPKINS ACADEMY
GRANT IS 230836. THE MAPPING
STATUS IS NSFHA.
HOPKINS ACADEMY GRANT WEST, TOWNSHIP OF
HORSE HEAD ISLAND
HOULTON, TOWN OF
HOWLAND, TOWN OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
HUNGRY ISLAND
INDIAN ISLAND
INDIAN PURCHASE 3, TOWNSHIP OF
INDIAN PURCHASE 4, TOWNSHIP OF
INDIAN STREAM Tl R6 BKPEKR, TOWNSHIP OF
INDUSTRY, TOWN OF
INNER PORCUPINE ISLAND
ISLAND FALLS, TOWN OF
ISLESBORO, TOWN OF
JACKMAN, TOWN OF
JACKSON, TOWN OF
JAY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
JIM POND, TOWNSHIP OF Tl R5 WBKP
JOHNSON MOUNTAIN T2 R6 BKPWKR, TOWNSHIP OF
JONES GARDEN ISLAND
JONESPORT, TOWN OF
KATAHDIN IRON WORKS T6 R9; TOWNSHIP OF
KENDUSKEAG, TOWN OF
KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF
KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF
KIBBY T01 R06 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
KILLICK STONE ISLAND
KINEO, TOWNSHIP OF
KING & BARTLETT T04 R05 BKP WKR, TWP. OF
KINGFIELD, TOWN OF
KINGMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
KINGSBURY PLANTATION
KITTERY, TOWN OF
KOSSUTH T7 R2 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKEVIEW PLANTATION
LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF
LAMBERT LAKE T01 R03 TS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/07/78(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/19/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/91(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/17/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/02/91(R)
05/15/91(R)
09/04/85(R)
1 1/20/89(R)
11/15/89(R)
10/18/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/05/89(R)
01/17/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/05/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/25/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
01/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/95
(NSFHA)
07/19/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/91
05/20/96
04/17/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
05/02/91
07/15/92
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
11/15/89
10/18/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/15/92
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
07/15/92
07/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/05/89
01/17/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/03/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/17/85(M)
Page 8 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230285#
230588
230936
230983
230394B
230003#
230912B
230004#
230551
230259A
230490
230985
230194#
230023#
230152#
230604
230109#
230172#
230427A
230005#
230238#
230984
230958
230935
230973
231031
230960
231023
230491
231033
230980
230735
230428
230006#
230173#
230492
230616
231035#
230552
230915
230336#
230395
Community Name
LAMOINE, TOWN OF
LANG T2 R3 WBKP TOWNSHIP OF
LARGE GREEN ISLAND
LASELLS ISLAND
LEE, TOWN OF
LEEDS, TOWN OF
LEVANT, TOWN OF
LEWISTON, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, T2 Rl BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWN OF
LILY BAY TA R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
LIME ISLAND
LIMERICK, TOWN OF
LIMESTONE, TOWN OF
LIMINGTON, TOWN OF
LINCOLN PLANTATION T5R2WBKP
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LINCOLNVILLE, TOWN OF
LINNEUS, TOWN OF
LISBON, TOWN OF
LITCHFIELD, TOWN OF
LITTLE BERMUDA ISLAND
LITTLE GREEN ISLAND
LITTLE GREEN ISLAND #2
LITTLE HURRICANE ISLAND
LITTLE MARSHALL ISLAND
LITTLE POND ISLAND
LITTLE SPRUCE HEAD
LITTLE SQUAW T3 R5 BKPEKR, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE SWAN ISLAND
LITTLE TWO BUSH ISLAND
LITTLE W, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLETON, TOWN OF
LIVERMORE FALLS, TOWN OF
LIVERMORE, TOWN OF
LOBSTER T3 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG A TA R8 & R9 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG ISLAND, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF LONG ISLAND HAS ADOPTED THE
CITY OF PORTLAND(230051)
FIRM DATED 12-8-98 PANELS 0003, 0004, 0009 and 0010.
LONG POND T3 Rl NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
LOUDS ISLAND
LOVELL, TOWN OF
LOWELL, TOWN OF
County
HANCOCK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/02/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/03/90(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/04/85(R)
11/19/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/11/95
08/05/91(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/17/97(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/17/89(R)
01/27/92
Current Effective
Map
05/02/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
07/16/90
07/01/91(L)
09/28/79
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/01/85
09/27/85(M)
04/01/82
(NSFHA)
09/18/87
05/03/90
09/18/85(M)
03/04/85
11/19/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/21/75
08/05/91
05/03/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/17/89
02/21/75
Page 9 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230858
230693
230736
230139#
230429
230195#
230694
230140#
230141#
230446A
230024B
230126#
230350A
230605
230952
230239#
230025B
230954
230286
230574
230988
230026#
230921
231030
230027#
230695
230859
230603
230617
230174#
230396#
230737
230007#
230410A
230175#
230176#
230860
230430A
230932
230931
230095#
230142#
230110#
Community Name
LOWELLTOWN T01 R08 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER CUPSUPTIC T04 R03 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER ENCHANTED T02 R05 BKP WKR, TWP. OF
LUBEC, TOWN OF
LUDLOW, TOWN OF
LYMAN, TOWN OF
LYNCHTOWN TO5 R04 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
MACHIAS, TOWN OF
MACHIASPORT, TOWN OF
MACWAHOC PLANTATION
MADAWASKA, TOWN OF
MADISON, TOWN OF
MADRID, TOWN OF
MAGALLOWAY PLANTATION
MALCOLM LEDGE ISLAND
MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
MAPLETON, TOWN OF
MARBLEHEAD ISLAND
MARIAVILLE, TOWN OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARK ISLAND
MARS HILL, TOWN OF
MARSH ISLAND
MARSHALL ISLAND
MASARDIS, TOWN OF
MASON, TOWNSHIP OF
MASSACHUSETTS GORE TO3 RO6 WBKP, TOWNSHIP
OF
MATINICUS ISLE PLANTATION
MATTAMISCONTIS Tl R7 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
MATTAWAMAKEAG, TOWN OF
MAXFIELD, TOWN OF
MAYFIELD TOWNSHIP T02 R02 BKP EKR, TWP. OF
MECHANIC FALLS, TOWN OF
MEDFORD, TOWN OF
MEDWAY, TOWN OF
MERCER, TOWN OF
MERRILL STRIP T02 R07 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
MERRILL, TOWN OF
METINIC GREEN ISLAND
METINIC ISLAND
MEXICO, TOWN OF
MILBRIDGE, TOWN OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/15/92(R)
09/30/99
05/15/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/18/88(R)
08/05/91(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/04/88(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/15/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/30/97
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/24/78(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/04/88(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/04/88(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/17/90(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/15/77(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/15/92
02/21/75
05/15/91
(NSFHA)
11/18/88
07/15/92
09/18/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
07/03/95
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/15/80
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
03/14/75
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/24/78(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/04/88
11/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
05/17/90
09/27/85(M)
09/30/87
05/02/94
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/15/81
07/15/92
04/17/78
Page 10 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230111#
230177#
230460A
230976
230008#
230553
230738
230520
230511
230240#
230260A
230411 A
23043 IB
230986
230517
230364B
230462A
230287#
230567
230861
230241A
230050#
230535
230642
230969
230447A
230201#
230432A
230365B
230059B
230433#
230218#
230196#
230398B
230337A
230569
230570
230219#
230178#
230197#
230228#
230521
Community Name
MILLINOCKET, TOWN OF
MILO, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
MINK ISLAND
MINOT, TOWN OF
MISERY GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
MISERY T02 R07 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
MOLUNKUS, TA R5 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
MONHEGAN PLAMTATION
MONMOUTH, TOWN OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
MONSON, TOWN OF
MONTICELLO, TOWN OF
MOOSE ISLAND
MORO PLANTATION
MOSCOW, TOWN OF
MOUNT CHASE TOWN
MOUNT DESERT, TOWN OF
MOXIE GORE Tl R5 BKP EKR, TOWNSHIP OF
MT. ABRAHAM TO4 RO1 BKP WKR
MT. VERNON, TOWN OF
NAPLES, TOWN OF
NASHVILLE PLANTATION
NESOURDNAHUNK T5 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
NETTLE ISLAND
NEW CANADA, TOWN OF
NEW GLOUCESTER, TOWN OF
NEW LIMERICK, TOWN OF
NEW PORTLAND, TOWN OF
NEW SHARON, TOWN OF
NEW SWEDEN, TOWN OF
NEWCASTLE, TOWN OF
NEWFIELD, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NEWRY, TOWN OF
NO. 14 PLANTATION
NO. 21 PLANTATION
NOBLEBORO, TOWN OF
NORRIDGEWOCK, TOWN OF
NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF
NORTH HAVEN, TOWN OF
NORTH YARMOUTH ACADEMY, T1R4 WELS, TWP. OF
County
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/05/89(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/17/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/17/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/02/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
10/24/78(R)
05/18/99
06/05/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/15/89(R)
06/03/88(R)
02/01/85(R)
07/16/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/05/89
05/20/96
04/17/87(M)
(NSFHA)
05/17/90(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/03/80
09/27/85(M)
09/27/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/01/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
08/02/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
04/01/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
04/01/82
09/04/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
10/24/78(M)
05/17/77
06/05/85
09/18/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/15/89
05/06/96
02/01/85
07/16/91
(NSFHA)
Page 11 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230202#
230493
230179#
230096#
230957
230028B
230242#
230632#
230153#
230112#
230029#
230288A
230465A
230113#
230180
230595
230289A
230203#
230956
231010
230075#
230536
230696
230869#
230263A
230366B
230097#
230697
230554
230698
230154#
230114#
230115#
230143A
230290#
230589
230631
230319#
230098#
230060#
230120#
231002
230739
230127#
230555
230243#
230977
Community Name
NORTH YARMOUTH, TOWN OF
NORTHEAST CARRY T3 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTHPORT, TOWN OF
NORWAY, TOWN OF
OAK ISLAND
OAKFIELD, TOWN OF
OAKLAND, TOWN OF
OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF
OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF
OLD TOWN, CITY OF
ORIENT, TOWN OF
ORLAND,TOWN OF
ORNEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
ORONO, TOWN OF
ORRINGTON, TOWN OF
OSBORN, TOWN OF
OTIS, TOWN OF
OTISFIELD, TOWN OF
OTTER ISLAND
OUTER PORCUPINE ISLAND
OWL'S HEAD, TOWN OF
OXBOW PLANTATION
OXBOW T04 R05 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
OXFORD, TOWN OF
PALERMO, TOWN OF
PALMYRA, TOWN OF
PARIS, TOWN OF
PARKERTOWN, T05 R03 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
PARLIN POND T3 R7 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
PARMACHENEE T05 R05 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF
PASSADUMKEAG, TOWN OF
PATTEN, TOWN OF
PEMBROKE, TOWN OF
PENOBSCOT, TOWN OF
PERKINS, TOWNSHIP OF
PERKINS, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWN OF
PERU, TOWN OF
PHILLIPS, TOWN OF
PHIPPSBURG, TOWN OF
PICKERING ISLAND
PIERCE POND T02 R04 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
PITTSFIELD, TOWN OF
PITTSTON ACADEMY GRANT T2 R4 NBKP, TWP. OF
PITTSTON, TOWN OF
PLEASANT ISLAND
County
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/81(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/15/91(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/15/88(R)
07/05/83(R)
07/05/84(R)
04/17/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/17/87(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/20/94
10/20/89(R)
04/24/98
05/19/81(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/19/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/02/91(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/17/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/09/99
07/16/91(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/17/90(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/16/81(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/81
(NSFHA)
05/15/91
09/04/91
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
06/15/88
07/15/92
07/05/84
04/17/78
08/19/85(M)
02/04/87(M)
04/17/87(M)
07/03/78
02/07/75
(NSFHA)
07/26/77
05/19/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/19/89
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/02/91
03/01/87(L)
08/19/85(M)
09/27/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/18/79
05/17/88
09/18/85(M)
10/29/76
07/16/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/97
05/17/90
04/17/95
07/20/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/19/96
(NSFHA)
04/06/98
(NSFHA)
Page 12 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230367A
230740
230399B
230009#
230929
230993
230031 A
230338#
23005 1#
230968
230204#
230463A
230741
230032#
230320B
230941
230996
230494
230244#
230582
230352#
230205#
230245#
230862
230434
231028
230699
230121#
230700
230368B
230321#
230989
230076#
230077#
230634
230467
230246#
230322C
230922
230181A
230099#
230742
23001 1#
230155#
Community Name
PLEASANT RIDGE, PLANTATION OF
PLYMOUTH T01 R04 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
POLAND, TOWN OF
POLINS LEDGES ISLAND
POND ISLAND
PORTAGE LAKE, TOWN OF
PORTER, TOWN OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POVERTY NUB ISLAND
POWNAL, TOWN OF
PRENTISS PLANTATION
PRENTISS T04 R04 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
PRESQUE ISLE, CITY OF
PRINCETON, TOWN OF
PUDDING ISLAND
PUMPKIN ISLAND
RAINBOWTOWN T2 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
RANDOLPH, TOWN OF
RANGELEY PLANTATION
RANGELEY, TOWN OF
RAYMOND, TOWN OF
READFIELD, TOWN OF
REDINGTON T01 R02 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
REED PLANTATION
RESOLUTION ISLAND
RICHARDSONTOWN T04 R01 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHMOND, TOWN OF
RILEY TA1, TOWNSHIP OF
RIPLEY, TOWN OF
ROBBINSTON, TOWN OF
ROBINSON ROCK ISLAND
ROCKLAND, CITY OF
ROCKPORT, TOWN OF
ROCKWOOD STRIP T2 Rl NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKWOOD STRIP TO1 RO1 NBKP, TOWNS
ROME, TOWN OF
ROQUE BLUFFS, TOWN OF
ROSS ISLAND
ROXBURY, TOWN OF
RUMFORD, TOWN OF
RUSSELL POND T05 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SABATTUS, TOWN OF
SACO, CITY OF
County
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/01/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/17/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/02/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/15/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/05/79(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/05/81(R)
12/16/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/04/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
01/05/89(R)
05/04/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/01/87(R)
05/17/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/15/80(R)
01/05/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/01/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/01/91(L)
05/20/96
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
12/04/79
12/08/98
(NSFHA)
12/02/80(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
10/15/80
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/05/94
(NSFHA)
09/08/99
05/05/81
12/16/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/07/98
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
05/03/93
(NSFHA)
01/05/89
05/04/89
(NSFHA)
12/01/87(L)
05/17/88
07/15/92
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
02/15/80
03/16/98
Page 13 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230982
230590
230744
230745
230746
230583
230156#
230413#
230556
230052#
230998
231020
230265B
230185#
230206#
230414#
230610
230747
230291#
230863
230942
230198#
230495
230999
230033B
230247#
230452A
230864
230128#
231013
231014
230370B
230034B
230748
230618
230371B
230512#
230643
230292A
230157#
230220#
230053#
230078#
230938
230221#
230293#
230995
Community Name
SADDLE ISLAND
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDBAR TRACT, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDWICH ACADEMY T02 R01 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDY BAY T05 R03 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDY RIVER PLANTATION
SANFORD, TOWN OF
SANGERVILLE, TOWN OF
SAPLING Tl R7 BKPWKR, TOWNSHIP OF
SCARBOROUGH, TOWN OF
SCOTT ISLAND
SCRAG ISLAND
SEARSMONT, TOWN OF
SEARSPORT, TOWN OF
SEBAGO, TOWN OF
SEBEC, TOWN OF
SEBOEIS PLANTATION
SEBOOMOOK, TOWNSHIP OF
SEDGWICK,TOWN OF
SEVEN PONDS T03 R05 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
SHAG LEDGE ISLAND
SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF
SHAWTOWN TA R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SHEEP ISLAND
SHERMAN, TOWN OF
SIDNEY, TOWN OF
SILVER RIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF
SKINNER T01 R07 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
SKOWHEGAN, TOWN OF
SLOOP ISLAND
SLOOP ISLAND LEDGE
SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
SMYRNA, TOWN OF
SOLDIERTOWN T02 R03 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
SOLDIERTOWN T2 R7 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SOLON, TOWN OF
SOMERVILLE, TOWN OF
SOPER MOUNTAIN T8 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SORRENTO, TOWN OF
SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF
SOUTH BRISTOL, TOWN OF
SOUTH PORTLAND, CITY OF
SOUTH THOMASTON, TOWN OF
SOUTHERN TRIANGLES ISLAND
SOUTHPORT, TOWN OF
SOUTHWEST HARBOR, TOWN OF
SPECTACLE ISLAND
County
KNOX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/04/85(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/30/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/17/90(R)
04/01/81(R)
09/21/81(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
01/05/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/03/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
08/17/81(R)
05/17/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
05/17/88(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/20/98
04/02/93
(NSFHA)
04/02/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
05/17/90
04/01/81
04/02/93
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/05/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
11/20/98
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/20/95
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
08/19/91
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
06/05/85
07/16/90
04/17/85
05/17/89
(NSFHA)
05/17/88
06/03/91
(NSFHA)
Page 14 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230963
230644
230767
230557
230435B
230369A
230522
230183A
230229#
230448A
230743
230401A
230207#
230372#
230402#
230591
230266#
230340A
230294#
230186#
230061#
230295A
230838
230187B
230296#
230297A
230267A
230341#
230772
230620
230840
230499
230648
230649
230650
230773
230621
230622
230623
230651
230652
230653
Community Name
SPECTACLE ISLAND
SPENCER BAY Tl R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SQUAPAN T10 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
SQUARETOWN T2 R5 BKP EKR, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. AGATHA, TOWN OF
ST. ALBANS, TOWN OF
ST. CROIX T8 R4 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. FRANCIS, TOWN OF
ST. GEORGE, TOWN OF
ST. JOHN PLANTATION
ST. JOHN T06 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
STACYVILLE, TOWN OF
STANDISH, TOWN OF
STARKS, TOWN OF
STETSON, TOWN OF
STETSONTOWN, T3 R4 WBKP
STOCKTON SPRINGS, TOWN OF
STONEHAM, TOWN OF
STONINGTON, TOWN OF
STOW, TOWN OF
STRONG, TOWN OF
SULLIVAN, TOWN OF
SUMMIT TO1 ND, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMNER, TOWN OF
SURRY, TOWN OF
SWANS ISLAND, TOWN OF
SWANVILLE,TOWN OF
SWEDEN, TOWN OF
T01 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T01 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R08 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R09 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T02 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
KNOX COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/01/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/19/81(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
01/03/86(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
11/14/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/02/91(R)
03/01/87(R)
02/04/87(R)
10/31/78(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
07/19/93
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
10/16/84
04/20/00
08/19/91
(NSFHA)
05/02/94
01/03/86(M)
06/03/91
11/14/78(M)
06/15/94
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
05/02/91
03/01/87(L)
02/04/87(M)
10/31/78(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 15 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230500
230597
230841
230774
230559
230775
230754
230624
230625
230842
230501
230502
230654
230703
230776
230755
230626
230843
230655
230656
230657
230658
230659
230660
230661
230756
230822
230844
230757
230758
230845
230627
230503
230504
230662
230663
230664
230759
Community Name
T02 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 ND,TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R01 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R04 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R05 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R09 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T03 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 ND, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R05 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R09 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T04 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 ND BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R01 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R06 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R07 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R09 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 16 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230560
230561
230562
230823
230824
230628
230629
230630
230505
230665
230666
230506
230667
230760
230563
230524
230846
230847
230848
230668
230669
230670
230671
230507
230672
230673
230509
230761
230564
230762
230763
230598
230825
230525
230575
230777
230849
230850
Community Name
T05 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R19 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T05 R20 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 ND BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R01 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T06 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R09 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 R19 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T07 SD, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R03 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R04 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 17 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230851
230674
230675
230508
230676
230677
230764
230874
230565
230566
230458A
230778
230779
230780
230781
230782
230678
230679
230680
230681
230682
230683
230684
230875
230876
230877
230704
230783
230784
230785
230786
230685
230686
230687
Community Name
T08 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 R19 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T08 SD, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R04 WELS (GRISWOLD), TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 R18 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T09 SD, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/01/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 18 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230870
230871
230872
230873
230878
230599
230826
230526
230787
230788
230789
230790
230791
230792
230793
230527
230794
230795
230528
230529
230796
230797
230798
230799
230800
230801
230802
230803
230804
230805
230806
Community Name
T10 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T10 SD, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R03 NBPP, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
THRU WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Til R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
Tl 1 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T12 R17 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 19 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230807
230808
230809
230810
230811
230812
230813
230814
230815
230816
230817
230530
230818
230879
230880
230881
230882
230883
230884
230885
230886
230531
230887
230532
230888
230889
230890
230891
230892
230893
Community Name
T13 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T13 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP
T14 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T14 R16 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R05 WELS, TONEHSIP OF
T15 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 RIO WELS, TONWSHIP OF
T15 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 20 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230894
230895
230705
230533
230896
230897
230898
230899
230534
230900
230901
230902
230453A
230454A
230903
230904
230905
230576
230827
230906
230907
230908
230909
230828
230829
230910
230911
230600
230577
230830
230579
Community Name
T15 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T15 R15 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R06 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R08 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R09 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T16 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R03 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R05 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T17 R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 ED BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T18 R13 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T19 ED BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T19 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T19 Rll WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T19 R12 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
T22 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T24 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T25 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T26 ED BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
County
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/01/86(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
05/19/87(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 21 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230578
230601
230831
230580
230706
230707
230708
230832
230833
230709
230710
230711
230834
230835
230770
230619
230497
230498
230544
230645
230646
230771
230523
230062#
230749
230542
230943
230933
230920
230079B
230750
230268A
230928
230866
230558
230122#
230867
230701
230298#
230299#
Community Name
T27 ED BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T28 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T30 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T31 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T32 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T34 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T35 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T36 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T37 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T39 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T40 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T41 MD, TOWNSHIP OF
T42 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
T43 MD BPP, TOWNSHIP OF
TA R02 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TA R07 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TA RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TA Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TAUNTON & RAINHAM ACADEMY GRANT TI RI NBKP
FORMERLY THE TOWNSHIP OF ARKWITH Tl Rl NBKP.
TB RIO WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TB Rl 1 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TC R02 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TD R02 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
TEMPLE, TOWN OF
TEN THOUSAND ACRE TRACT Tl R6 BKP WKR,
TOWNSHIP OF
THE FORKS PLANTATION
THE HOGSHEAD ISLAND
THE NUBBLE ISLAND
THIEF ISLAND
THOMASTON, TOWN OF
THORNDIKE T03 R02 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
THORNDIKE, TOWN OF
THRUMCAP ISLAND
TIM POND T02 R04 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
TOMHEGAN T01 R02 NBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
TOPSHAM, TOWN OF
TOWNSHIP 6, TOWNSHIP OF
TOWNSHIP C, TOWNSHIP OF
TREMONT, TOWN OF
TRENTON, TOWN OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/01/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
10/16/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/02/90(R)
08/02/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/16/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/02/90
08/02/90
Page 22 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230473#
230269A
230010#
231003
230979
230647
230080#
230131B
230602
230702
230751
230768
230342#
230036#
230839
230403#
230249#
230230A
230752
230436A
230326
230086#
230449A
230081#
230037#
230592
230199#
230343#
230070#
230188#
230930
230769
230611
230353A
230416#
230158#
230327A
23021 1#
230543
230250#
230100#
230054#
230926
Community Name
TRESCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
TROY, TOWN OF
TURNER, TOWN OF
TWO BUSH ISLAND
TWO BUSH ISLAND
TX R14 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWN OF
UNITY, TOWN OF
UNITY, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER CUPSUPTIC T04 R04 WBKP, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER ENCHANTED T3 R6 BKP WKR, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MOLUNKUS T01 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
UPTON, TOWN OF
VAN BUREN, TOWN OF
VEAZIE GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
VEAZIE, TOWN OF
VIENNA, TOWN OF
VINALHAVEN, TOWN OF
W. MIDDLESEX CANAL GRANT Tl R3 NBKP, TWP.
WADE, TOWN OF
WAITE, TOWN OF
WALDOBORO, TOWN OF
WALLAGRASS, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WASHBURN, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WATERBORO, TOWN OF
WATERFORD, TOWN OF
WATERVILLE, CITY OF
WAYNE, TOWN OF
WEBBER DRY LEDGE ISLAND
WEBBERTOWN T07 R04 WELS, TOWNSHIP OF
WEBSTER PLANTATION
WELD, TOWN OF
WELLINGTON, TOWN OF
WELLS, TOWN OF
WESLEY, TOWN OF
WEST BATH, TOWN OF
WEST FORKS PLANTATION
WEST GARDINER, TOWN OF
WEST PARIS, TOWN OF
WESTBROOK, CITY OF
WESTERN EGG ROCK ISLAND
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/85(R)
04/17/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/01/87(R)
03/18/86(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/19/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
03/01/87(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/09/85(R)
04/03/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
10/15/80(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/01/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
02/17/88(R)
04/03/89(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
11/21/78(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/17/81(R)
04/30/84(R)
03/28/80(R)
06/03/88(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/08/99
04/17/87(M)
06/19/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/17/98
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/01/87(L)
03/18/86(M)
(NSFHA)
05/01/78
11/20/98
03/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/03/85
09/04/85(M)
04/17/85
10/15/80
(NSFHA)
02/01/85
04/01/82
05/07/01
04/03/89
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
11/21/78(M)
07/15/92
09/18/85(M)
08/21/81(M)
(NSFHA)
03/28/80
06/03/88
01/02/81
(NSFHA)
Page 23 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230992
230038B
230537
230939
230329#
230496
230417B
230063#
230189#
23025 IB
230404
230071#
230302#
230271#
230450A
230072#
230223#
230040B
230344A
230210#
230924
230923
230593
230055#
230981
230159#
Community Name
WESTERN ISLAND
WESTFIELD, TOWN OF
WESTMANLAND, TOWN OF
WHEELER BIG ROCK ISLAND
WHITNEYVILLE, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSBURG T6 R8 NWP, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIMANTIC, TOWN OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
WINDHAM, TOWN OF
WINDSOR,TOWN OF
WINN, TOWN OF
WINSLOW, TOWN OF
WINTER HARBOR, TOWN OF
WINTERPORT, TOWN OF
WINTER VILLE PLANTATION
WINTHROP, TOWN OF
WISCASSET, TOWN OF
WOODLAND, TOWN OF
WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
WOOLWICH, TOWN OF
WRECK ISLAND
WRECK ISLAND LEDGE
WYMAN T4 R3 BKP WKP, TOWNSHIP OF
YARMOUTH, TOWN OF
YELLOW LEDGE ISLAND
YORK, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
955
940
540
154
15
14
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/09/85(R)
04/30/84(R)
02/08/0 1(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/17/89(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
02/04/87(R)
12/16/91
09/30/87(R)
05/15/91(R)
05/03/90(R)
11/01/85(R)
08/15/80(R)
1 1/20/9 1(R)
12/04/85(R)
04/01/87(R)
07/16/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
11/15/84(R)
04/30/84(R)
12/15/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/04/83
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
02/17/89
09/02/81
02/04/87(M)
01/24/75
05/07/01
05/15/91
05/03/90
11/01/85(M)
08/15/80
04/16/91
12/04/85(M)
04/01/87(L)
07/16/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/15/84
(NSFHA)
07/15/92
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 24 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
CID
230083
230272
230354B
230407#
230252
230913
230374
230375
230376
230308B
230307
230309
230224#
230310#
230279
230424A
230281A
230386
230282#
230166
230425
230226A
230315
230258A
230393
230193
230316B
230261A
230363
230262A
230351A
230379#
230318
230412
230030
230264
--Not In
Community Name
"MAINE
ALNA, TOWN OF
AMHERST, TOWN OF
ATHENS, TOWN OF
ATKINSON, TOWN OF
BELMONT, TOWN OF
BOWDOIN, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
CARMEL, TOWN OF
CHARLESTON, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA FALLS, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
CRAWFORD, TOWN OF
GUSHING, TOWN OF
CUTLER, TOWN OF
DEDHAM, TOWN OF
DYER BROOK, TOWN OF
EASTBROOK, TOWN OF
EXETER, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
GILEAD, TOWN OF
HERSEY, TOWN OF
HOPE, CITY OF
JONESBORO, TOWN OF
KNOX, TOWN OF
LAGRANGE, TOWN OF
LEBANON, TOWN OF
MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF
MONTVILLE, TOWN OF
MOOSE RIVER, TOWN OF
MORRILL, TOWN OF
NEW VINEYARD, TOWN OF
NEWBURGH, TOWN OF
NORTHFIELD, TOWN OF
PARKMAN, TOWN OF
PERHAM, TOWN OF
PROSPECT, TOWN OF
The Program--
county
LINCOLN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
SAGADAHOC
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
OXFORD COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
01/03/75
01/24/75
09/27/85(F)
12/04/85(F)
03/14/75
12/17/76
02/07/75
02/28/75
02/21/75
09/04/85(F)
02/14/75
01/17/75
07/16/90(F)
08/05/85(F)
04/18/75
08/19/85(F)
03/01/87(F)
02/21/75
07/16/91(F)
02/07/75
12/20/74
02/19/86(F)
02/14/75(F)
09/27/85(F)
02/28/75
02/07/75
09/18/85(F)
02/21/75
01/17/75
09/18/85(F)
11/01/85(F)
12/04/85(F)
02/14/75
02/14/75
04/18/75
02/14/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/03/76
01/24/76
11/01/85(8)
12/04/85(8)
03/14/76
12/17/77
02/07/76
02/29/76
02/21/76
09/04/85(8)
02/14/76
01/17/76
11/02/90(8)
03/15/93(8)
04/18/76
05/17/90(8)
05/17/90(8)
02/21/76
07/16/91(8)
02/07/76
12/20/75
02/19/86(8)
02/14/76
11/01/85(8)
02/29/76
02/07/76
09/18/85(8)
02/21/76
01/17/76
09/18/85(8)
05/17/90(8)
12/04/85(8)
02/14/76
02/14/76
04/18/76
02/14/76
Page 25 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
230415#
230400
230323A
230035
230914
230324
230325A
230248
230300
230270A
230439
230301A
230082A
230039
230222A
230087A
230328A
Community Name
SHIRLEY, TOWN OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
STEUBEN, TOWN OF
STOCKHOLM, TOWN OF
TALMADGE, TOWN OF
TOPSFIELD, TOWN OF
VANCEBORO, TOWN OF
VASSALBORO, TOWN OF
VERONA, TOWN OF
WALDO, TOWN OF
WALES, TOWN OF
WALTHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WESTON, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
WHITEFIELD, TOWN OF
WHITING, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
PISCATAQUIS
COUNTY
PENOBSCOT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KENNEBEC COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WALDO COUNTY
ANDROSCOGGIN
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
AROOSTOOK
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
0
18
0
Hazard Area
Identified
01/24/75
01/24/75
07/15/92(F)
01/10/75
12/17/76
03/14/75
08/19/85(F)
02/07/75
11/26/76
09/18/85(F)
02/21/75
07/02/87(F)
09/06/74
02/21/75
01/03/75
07/26/74
08/05/85(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/24/76
01/24/76
02/21/76
01/10/76
12/17/77
03/14/76
08/19/85(8)
02/07/76
11/26/77
09/18/85(8)
02/21/76
05/17/90(8)
09/06/75
02/21/76
01/03/76
07/26/75
05/17/90(8)
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 53
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 53
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 26 of 26
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
24004 1#
240093B
24000 1#
240009#
240008#
2400 10#
240087#
240094#
240002#
240042#
240141#
240095#
24007 1#
240166#
240097B
240028B
24001 1#
240098#
240130#
240015#
2400 19#
240020
240056#
240089#
24002 1#
240100#
240099#
240046#
240101#
240057#
240072B
240062#
240003#
240102#
240104#
240026#
240067#
240105B
Communities
Community Name
"MARYLAND
ABERDEEN, TOWN OF
ACCIDENT, TOWN OF
ALLEGANY COUNTY *
ANNAPOLIS, CITY OF
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY *
BALTIMORE COUNTY*
BALTIMORE, CITY OF
BARNESVILLE, TOWN OF
BARTON, TOWN OF
BEL AIR, TOWN OF
BERLIN, TOWN OF
BETTERTON, TOWN OF
BOONSBORO, TOWN OF
BROOKEVILLE, TOWN OF
BROOKVIEW, TOWN OF
BRUNSWICK, CITY OF
CALVERT COUNTY*
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CAROLINE COUNTY *
CARROLL COUNTY *
CECIL COUNTY*
CECILTON, TOWN OF
CENTREVILLE, TOWN OF
CHARLES COUNTY *
CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF
CHESAPEAKE BEACH, TOWN OF
CHESAPEAKE CITY, TOWN OF
CHESTERTOWN, TOWN OF
CHURCH CREEK, TOWN OF
CHURCH HILL, TOWN OF
CLEAR SPRING, TOWN OF
CRISFIELD, CITY OF
CUMBERLAND, CITY OF
DEER PARK, TOWN OF
DENTON, TOWN OF
DORCHESTER COUNTY *
EASTON, TOWN OF
ELDORADO, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
HARFORD COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ANNE ARUNDEL
COUNTY
ANNE ARUNDEL
COUNTY
BALTIMORE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
HARFORD COUNTY
WORCHESTER
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
CALVERT COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
CHARLES COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
CALVERT COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/81(R)
09/01/78(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
05/02/83(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
03/15/78(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/18/86(R)
02/02/83(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/19/89(R)
01/07/77(R)
01/07/77(R)
09/28/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/15/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
04/04/83(R)
10/28/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
11/01/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
02/15/84(R)
07/25/95(R)
06/03/86(R)
04/17/85(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/16/94(R)
12/18/79(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/28/84(R)
12/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/07/00
09/01/78(M)
09/29/89
11/04/81
09/27/85
11/17/93
09/30/88
08/10/79(M)
09/28/79
01/07/00
09/18/86
02/02/83
07/16/80
06/19/89
01/07/77(M)
01/07/77(M)
07/20/98
01/16/81
09/07/98
08/07/81
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
09/27/85
06/05/85
11/17/82
11/01/84
10/15/81
02/15/84
10/18/88
06/03/86(M)
04/17/85(M)
06/16/92
09/01/83
08/16/94
12/18/79
06/16/92
09/28/84
12/15/78(M)
Page 1 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
240022#
240029#
240013#
240027#
240030#
240035#
240004#
240139#
240073#
240050#
240034#
240165
2400 14#
240074#
240090#
240109#
240040#
240043#
240161#
240111#
240044#
240112#
24009 1#
240075#
240045#
240036#
240092A
240053#
240065#
240005#
240114#
240162#
240006#
240058#
240049#
24003 8#
240149#
2400 12#
240023#
240039#
245207#
240068#
240024#
240084#
240025B
Community Name
ELKTON, TOWN OF
EMMITSBURG, TOWN OF
FEDERALSBURG, TOWN OF
FREDERICK COUNTY *
FREDERICK, CITY OF
FRIENDSVILLE, TOWN OF
FROSTBURG, CITY OF
FRUITLAND, CITY OF
FUNKSTOWN, TOWN OF
GAITHERSBURG, CITY OF
GARRETT COUNTY *
GRANTSVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENSBORO, TOWN OF
HAGERSTOWN, CITY OF
HAMPSTEAD, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HARFORD COUNTY *
HAVRE DE GRACE, CITY OF
HIGHLAND BEACH, TOWN OF
HILLSBORO, TOWN OF
HOWARD COUNTY*
HURLOCK, TOWN OF
INDIAN HEAD, TOWN OF
KEEDYSVILLE, TOWN OF
KENT COUNTY *
KITZMILLERVILLE, TOWN OF
LA PLATA, TOWN OF
LAUREL, CITY OF
LEONARDTOWN, TOWN OF
LONACONING, TOWN OF
LUKE, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
MIDLAND, TOWN OF
MILLINGTON, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MOUNTAIN LAKE PARK, TOWN OF
NEW WINDSOR, TOWN OF
NORTH BEACH, CITY OF
NORTH EAST, TOWN OF
OAKLAND, TOWN OF
OCEAN CITY, TOWN OF
OXFORD TOWNSHIP OF
PERRYVILLE, TOWN OF
POCOMOKE CITY, CITY OF
PORT DEPOSIT, TOWN OF
County
CECIL COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HARFORD COUNTY
HARFORD COUNTY
ANNE ARUNDEL
COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
CHARLES COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
CHARLES COUNTY
PRINCE GEORGES CO.
ST. MARYS COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CALVERT COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/80(R)
09/17/80(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/14/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
11/15/85(R)
02/01/78(R)
12/01/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/29/88(R)
11/01/79(R)
04/17/78(R)
01/07/83(R)
02/17/82(R)
03/02/83(R)
03/15/77(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
02/12/82(R)
03/15/77(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
01/02/80(R)
12/04/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
11/01/78(R)
09/28/84(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/80(R)
1 0/23/8 1(R)
08/15/79(R)
11/03/82(R)
07/02/79(R)
10/16/84(R)
02/16/79(R)
09/28/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
09/28/84(R)
03/01/77(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/16/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/16/92
09/17/80
09/07/98
12/19/97
08/19/91
09/14/79
12/18/79
11/15/85
02/01/78
12/01/82
08/16/94
(NSFHA)
11/01/79
02/15/84
01/07/83(M)
02/17/82
01/07/00
01/07/00
10/15/82
02/12/82(M)
04/02/97
01/16/81
10/15/85
01/02/80
06/16/92
10/15/85
04/17/85(M)
08/19/85
11/19/87
09/28/79
08/15/83
1 0/23/8 1(M)
08/15/79
11/03/82
06/16/92
08/16/94
02/16/79(M)
09/28/84
10/15/81
10/18/95
02/04/88
09/28/84
09/30/92
09/03/80
02/16/77
Page 2 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
240163
245208#
240063#
240059#
240054#
240120#
2401 5 8#
240048#
24005 1#
240080#
240123#
240076#
24008 1#
240124#
240086#
24006 1#
240064#
240069#
2400 16#
240066#
24003 1#
2400 17#
240127A
240032#
240070#
240007#
2400 18#
240078#
240082B
240077B
240033B
240083#
Community Name
PRESTON, TOWN OF
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY *
DOES NOT INCLUDE THE CITY OF LAUREL
PRINCESS ANNE, TOWN OF
QUEEN ANNE, TOWN OF
QUEEN ANNES COUNTY
QUEENSTOWN, TOWN OF
RISING SUN, CITY OF
ROCK HALL, TOWN OF
ROCKVILLE, CITY OF
SALISBURY, CITY OF
SECRETARY, TOWN OF
SHARPSBURG, TOWN OF
SHARPTOWN, TOWN OF
SMITHSBURG, TOWN OF
SNOW HILL, TOWN OF
SOMERSET COUNTY *
ST. MARYS COUNTY*
ST. MICHAELS, TOWN OF
SYKESVILLE, TOWN OF
TALBOT COUNTY *
THURMONT, TOWN OF
UNION BRIDGE, TOWN OF
VIENNA, TOWN OF
WALKERSVILLE, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WESTERNPORT, CITY OF
WESTMINSTER, CITY OF
WICOMICO COUNTY *
WILLARDS, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSPORT, TOWN OF
WOODSBORO, TOWN OF
WORCESTER COUNTY *
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
County
CAROLINE COUNTY
PRINCE GEORGES CO.
SOMERSET COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
QUEEN ANNES
COUNTY
CECIL COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ST. MARYS COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
TALBOT COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
115
114
3
16
1
1
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/28/77(R)
08/04/72(R)
04/20/79(R)
12/05/00(R)
09/28/84(R)
09/28/84(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/01/83(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/28/84(R)
12/19/80(R)
01/02/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/13/94
05/15/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/19/87(R)
11/01/84(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
12/15/78(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/01/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/28/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/10/77(R)
12/15/78(R)
02/15/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
09/06/96
06/02/94
09/27/85
06/16/92
09/28/84
05/15/86
09/01/83
01/05/78
09/28/84
04/02/92
01/02/80
09/27/85
06/06/01
05/15/80
07/20/98
05/17/93
11/01/84
10/10/80
06/16/92
09/28/79
08/01/77
12/15/78(M)
09/30/80
09/30/92
01/14/83
10/10/80
06/16/92
05/01/85(M)
06/10/77(M)
12/15/78(M)
04/21/99
Page 3 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 4 of 5 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"MARYLAND
240106 GALESTOWN, TOWN OF
240037# LOCH LYNN HEIGHTS, TOWN OF
240079# MARDELA SPRINGS, TOWN OF
240116A MYERSVILLE, TOWN OF
240118# POOLES VILLE, TOWN OF
County
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
GARRETT COUNTY
WICOMICO COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/11/75
08/15/79(F)
09/27/85(F)
12/15/78(F)
10/15/82(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/11/76
08/15/79(8)
12/02/88(8)
05/04/89(8)
08/21/82
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 3
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 5
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 5
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 5 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250259#
250176#
250048#
250016#
250133#
250017#
250075#
250156#
250076#
250177#
250290#
250178B
250109B
250179#
250291#
250049#
250292#
25023 1#
250180#
250001#
250293#
250018#
255209#
250157#
250232#
250182#
250050#
250294#
250110#
250077#
250183#
250295#
250296#
250286#
255210#
250184#
250078#
250297#
250233#
250003#
250260#
250135#
250261#
250298#
250234B
250111#
250185#
Communities
Community Name
"MASSACHUSETTS
ABINGTON, TOWN OF
ACTON, TOWN OF
ACUSHNET, TOWN OF
ADAMS, TOWN OF
AGAWAM, TOWN OF
ALFORD, TOWN OF
AMESBURY, TOWN OF
AMHERST, TOWN OF
ANDOVER, TOWN OF
ARLINGTON, TOWN OF
ASHBURNHAM, TOWN OF
ASHBY, TOWN OF
ASHFIELD, TOWN OF
ASHLAND, TOWN OF
ATHOL, TOWN OF
ATTLEBORO, CITY OF
AUBURN, TOWN OF
AVON, TOWN OF
AYER, TOWN OF
BARNSTABLE, TOWN OF
BARRE, TOWN OF
BECKET ,TOWN OF
BEDFORD, TOWN OF
BELCHERTOWN, TOWN OF
BELLINGHAM, TOWN OF
BELMONT, TOWN OF
BERKLEY, TOWN OF
BERLIN, TOWN OF
BERNARDSTON, TOWN OF
BEVERLY, CITY OF
BILLERICA, TOWN OF
BLACKSTONE, TOWN OF
BOLTON, TOWN OF
BOSTON, CITY OF
BOURNE, TOWN OF
BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF
BOXFORD, TOWN OF
BOYLSTON, TOWN OF
BRAINTREE, TOWN OF
BREWSTER ,TOWN OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
BRIMFIELD, TOWN OF
BROCKTON, CITY OF
BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
BROOKLINE, TOWN OF
BUCKLAND, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/19/82(R)
08/01/83(R)
02/01/78(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/15/84(R)
08/01/96(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/15/82(R)
08/05/91(R)
09/07/73(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/18/86(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/30/77(R)
06/18/80(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/29/73(R)
09/15/78(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/17/82(R)
11/09/98(R)
03/01/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/05/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/02/93
01/06/88
07/19/82
08/01/83
02/01/78
12/01/77
08/03/92
12/15/83
06/05/89
07/05/82
06/15/84
04/29/77
09/27/85(M)
07/16/81
07/19/82
05/29/81
06/03/91
09/20/95
03/18/91
07/02/92
06/15/82
08/05/91
07/04/88
09/02/81
12/15/82
06/15/82
07/03/78
06/18/80
07/02/80
07/02/92
08/05/85
09/30/77
06/18/80
07/02/92
08/09/99
09/08/99
06/03/91
07/03/85
12/20/00
05/17/93
09/08/99
08/02/82
12/26/80
07/02/81
11/28/80
11/15/80
07/05/84
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250186#
250235#
250187#
250262#
250112#
250299#
250004#
250188#
250287#
250019#
250136#
250158#
250137#
250020#
250300#
250236#
250113#
250189#
250114#
250159#
250021#
250079#
250051#
250237#
250115#
250005#
250052#
250301#
250238#
250190#
250302#
250191#
250263#
250264#
250303#
250138#
250006#
250160#
250053#
250069#
250022#
250116#
250080#
250192#
250054#
250055#
255211#
250304#
250239#
250193#
250240#
250056#
Community Name
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CANTON,TOWN OF
CARLISLE, TOWN OF
CARVER, TOWN OF
CHARLEMONT, TOWN OF
CHARLTON, TOWN OF
CHATHAM, TOWN OF
CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF
CHELSEA, CITY OF
CHESHIRE, TOWN OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWN OF
CHICOPEE, CITY OF
CLARKSBURG, TOWN OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
COHASSET, TOWN OF
COLRAIN, TOWN OF
CONCORD, TOWN OF
CONWAY, TOWN OF
CUMMINGTON, TOWN OF
DALTON, TOWN OF
DANVERS, TOWN OF
DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF
DEDHAM, TOWN OF
DEERFIELD, TOWN OF
DENNIS, TOWN OF
DIGHTON, TOWN OF
DOUGLAS, TOWN OF
DOVER, TOWN OF
DRACUT, TOWN OF
DUDLEY, TOWN OF
DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF
DUXBURY, TOWN OF
EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
EAST BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
EAST LONGMEADOW, TOWN OF
EASTHAM, TOWN OF
EASTHAMPTON, TOWN OF
EASTON, TOWN OF
EDGARTOWN, TOWN OF
EGREMONT, TOWN OF
ERVING, TOWN OF
ESSEX, TOWN OF
EVERETT, CITY OF
FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF
FALL RIVER, CITY OF
FALMOUTH, TOWN OF
FITCHBURG, CITY OF
FOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF
FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
FREETOWN, TOWN OF
County
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/05/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
10/15/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/19/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/15/89(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/04/90(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/15/77(R)
12/01/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
10/06/76(R)
06/18/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
12/08/86(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/17/83(R)
02/03/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
03/16/76(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
05/18/73(R)
05/16/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/03/82(R)
02/17/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/05/82
06/04/87
05/17/88
07/19/82
07/02/80
07/19/82
07/20/98
06/04/80
08/02/82
07/19/82
10/16/84
08/15/89
09/29/78
07/05/82
06/15/82
07/02/92
07/02/80
06/03/88
06/04/80
06/04/90
07/05/82
07/02/80
07/02/92
08/13/82
07/02/80
07/02/92
06/18/80
06/01/82
06/04/87
06/05/89
06/15/82
07/05/82
07/02/92
07/02/81
06/15/81
09/15/78
07/02/92
08/15/79
08/09/00
07/20/98
06/15/82
07/05/82
07/20/98
06/03/86
07/02/92
01/05/84
04/16/93
09/18/91
12/15/79
03/16/92
02/17/82
06/18/80
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250070#
250081#
250117#
250082#
250161#
250071#
250306#
250162#
250024#
250118#
250194#
250083#
250163#
250265#
250084#
250140#
250025#
250266#
250267#
250307#
250308#
250008#
250164#
250085#
250119A
250350
250268#
250026#
255212#
250309#
250141#
250195#
250142#
250310#
250196#
250311#
250197#
250269#
250165#
250086#
250270#
250271#
250312#
250027#
250087#
250028#
250313#
250029#
250314#
250120#
250198#
250199#
250200#
250143#
250201#
Community Name
GAY HEAD, TOWN OF
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GILL, TOWN OF
GLOUCESTER, CITY OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GOSNOLD, TOWN OF
GRAFTON, TOWN OF
GRANBY, TOWN OF
GREAT BARRINGTON, TOWN OF
GREENFIELD, TOWN OF
GROTON, TOWN OF
GROVELAND, TOWN OF
HADLEY, TOWN OF
HALIFAX, TOWN OF
HAMILTON, TOWN OF
HAMPDEN, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HANOVER, TOWN OF
HANSON, TOWN OF
HARDWICK, TOWN OF
HARVARD, TOWN OF
HARWICH, TOWN OF
HATFIELD, TOWN OF
HAVERHILL, CITY OF
HAWLEY, TOWN OF
HEATH, TOWN OF
HINGHAM, TOWN OF
HINSDALE, TOWN OF
HOLBROOK, TOWN OF
HOLDEN, TOWN OF
HOLLAND, TOWN OF
HOLLISTON, TOWN OF
HOLYOKE, CITY OF
HOPEDALE, TOWN OF
HOPKINTON, TOWN OF
HUBBARDSTON, TOWN OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
HULL, TOWN OF
HUNTINGTON, TOWN OF
IPSWICH, TOWN OF
KINGSTON, TOWN OF
LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF
LANCASTER, TOWN OF
LANESBOROUGH, TOWN OF
LAWRENCE, CITY OF
LEE, TOWN OF
LEICESTER, TOWN OF
LENOX, TOWN OF
LEOMINSTER, CITY OF
LEVERETT, TOWN OF
LEXINGTON, TOWN OF
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LITTLETON, TOWN OF
LONGMEADOW, TOWN OF
LOWELL, CITY OF
County
DUKES COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
01/17/86(R)
10/17/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
05/02/83(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/05/82(R)
10/01/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/26/93(R)
11/15/78(R)
06/01/82(R)
12/15/82(R)
01/20/82(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/15/83(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/16/83(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/30/76(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/02/76(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
07/05/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/15/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
11/17/94(R)
12/15/79(R)
05/02/83(R)
07/15/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/16/82(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/15/83(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/16/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/29/96
06/04/80
06/18/80
07/20/98
03/07/80(M)
07/20/98
09/30/92
01/02/80
07/19/82
07/02/80
07/05/82
10/01/80
06/01/78
07/05/82
06/04/90
11/15/78
06/01/82
12/15/82
12/18/86
09/16/81
06/15/83
12/03/91
06/18/80
02/16/83
12/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/03/86
07/02/81
02/02/96
07/02/81
07/05/84
09/10/82
08/08/80
07/19/82
07/05/82
06/01/84
12/15/79
07/02/92
07/15/88
07/02/92
07/02/92
05/15/84
07/05/82
06/15/82
08/02/82
06/01/82
07/05/82
07/05/82
04/03/89
06/04/80
09/30/83
06/17/86
06/15/83
07/03/90
09/30/92
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250144#
250315#
250088#
250089#
250202#
250090#
250057#
250091#
255213#
250203#
250273#
250009#
255214#
250204#
250242#
250205#
250243#
250206#
250316#
250092#
250093#
250275#
250166#
250094#
250317#
250318#
250244#
250319#
250245#
250351A
250145#
250122#
250030#
250095#
250230#
250207#
255215#
250032
255216#
250320#
250033#
250123
250096#
250097#
250208#
255217#
250034#
250098#
250059#
250323#
250209#
250167#
250321#
250322#
Community Name
LUDLOW, TOWN OF
LUNENBURG, TOWN OF
LYNN, CITY OF
LYNNFIELD, TOWN OF
MALDEN, CITY OF
MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
MANSFIELD, TOWN OF
MARBLEHEAD, TOWN OF
MARION, TOWN OF
MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF
MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF
MASHPEE, TOWN OF
MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF
MAYNARD, TOWN OF
MEDFIELD, TOWN OF
MEDFORD, CITY OF
MEDWAY, TOWN OF
MELROSE , CITY OF
MENDON, TOWN OF
MERRIMAC, TOWN OF
METHUEN, TOWN OF
MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF
MIDDLEFIELD, TOWN OF
MIDDLETON, TOWN OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
MILLBURY, TOWN OF
MILLIS, TOWN OF
MILLVILLE, CITY OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
MONSON, TOWN OF
MONTAGUE, TOWN OF
MONTEREY, TOWN OF
NAHANT, TOWN OF
NANTUCKET, TOWN OF
NATICK, TOWN OF
NEEDHAM, TOWN OF
NEW ASHFORD, TOWN OF
NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF
NEW BRAINTREE, TOWN OF
NEW MARLBOROUGH, TOWN OF
NEW SALEM, TOWN OF
NEWBURY, TOWN OF
NEWBURYPORT, CITY OF
NEWTON, CITY OF
NORFOLK, TOWN OF
NORTH ADAMS, CITY OF
NORTH ANDOVER, TOWN OF
NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF
NORTH BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
NORTH READING, TOWN OF
NORTHAMPTON, CITY OF
NORTHBOROUGH, TOWN OF
NORTHBRIDGE, TOWN OF
County
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
NANTUCKET
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/19/81(R)
06/15/82(R)
02/01/85(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/19/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
04/01/77(R)
07/03/85(R)
04/06/73(R)
01/06/82(R)
10/14/77(R)
09/15/78(R)
03/16/73(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
01/03/86(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
07/05/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
12/04/85(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
07/19/76(R)
06/03/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
04/13/73(R)
06/01/96(R)
07/06/73(R)
06/15/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/01/87(R)
03/15/77(R)
02/15/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/20/71(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/15/83(R)
09/14/79(R)
07/05/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
11/15/79(R)
06/15/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/19/81
06/15/82
02/01/85
07/16/90
05/19/87
07/02/92
04/01/77
07/03/85
07/15/92
01/06/82
07/02/92
07/02/92
09/30/95
06/15/79
07/16/79
06/03/86
06/18/80
08/05/86
07/19/82
07/05/82
06/18/87
08/01/83
06/02/93
1 1/05/80
07/05/84
01/07/00
08/05/85
07/19/82
04/03/78
12/04/85(M)
07/16/96
02/12/82
06/15/81
09/28/84
11/06/96
02/01/80
06/05/89
06/01/96(L)
01/05/84
06/15/84
07/02/81
12/01/87(L)
07/02/92
11/01/85
06/04/90
08/19/85
07/02/81
06/02/93
09/14/79
07/05/82
03/05/96
04/03/78
11/15/79
06/15/83
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250124#
250060#
250276#
250248#
250072#
250324#
250125#
250010#
250035#
250325#
250147#
250326#
250099#
250277#
250210#
250327#
250328#
250037#
250249#
250278#
250279#
250329#
255218#
255219#
250251#
250061#
25021 1#
250062#
250288#
250038A
250280#
250281#
250100#
250330#
250148#
250331#
250102#
250103#
250039#
250012#
250104#
250282#
250063#
250252#
250041#
250127#
250212#
250213#
250332#
255220#
250214#
250170#
250171#
Community Name
NORTHFIELD, TOWN OF
NORTON, TOWN OF
NORWELL, TOWN OF
NORWOOD, TOWN OF
OAK BLUFFS, TOWN OF
OAKHAM, TOWN OF
ORANGE, TOWN OF
ORLEANS, CITY OF
OTIS, TOWN OF
OXFORD, TOWN OF
PALMER, TOWN OF
PAXTON, TOWN OF
PEABODY, CITY OF
PEMBROKE, TOWN OF
PEPPERELL, TOWN OF
PETERSHAM, TOWN OF
PHILLIPSTON, TOWN OF
PITTSFIELD, CITY OF
PLAINVILLE, TOWN OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
PLYMPTON, TOWN OF
PRINCETON, TOWN OF
PROVINCETOWN, TOWN OF
QUINCY, CITY OF
RANDOLPH, TOWN OF
RAYNHAM, TOWN OF
READING, TOWN OF
REHOBOTH, TOWN OF
REVERE, CITY OF
RICHMOND, TOWN OF
ROCHESTER, TOWN OF
ROCKLAND, TOWN OF
ROCKPORT, TOWN OF
ROY ALSTON, TOWN OF
RUSSELL, TOWN OF
RUTLAND, TOWN OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SALISBURY, TOWN OF
SANDISFIELD, TOWN OF
SANDWICH, TOWN OF
SAUGUS, TOWN OF
SCITUATE, TOWN OF
SEEKONK, TOWN OF
SHARON, TOWN OF
SHEFFIELD, TOWN OF
SHELBURNE, TOWN OF
SHERBORN, TOWN OF
SHIRLEY, TOWN OF
SHREWSBURY, TOWN OF
SOMERSET, TOWN OF
SOMERVILLE, CITY OF
SOUTH HADLEY, TOWN OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWN OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/80(R)
06/01/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
02/01/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/03/84(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/15/83(R)
01/20/82(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
05/15/80(R)
11/15/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/23/79(R)
07/16/84(R)
03/01/78(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
07/17/86(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
03/02/73(R)
09/21/73(R)
05/01/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/01/77(R)
10/16/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
12/15/90(R)
07/16/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
05/02/77(R)
12/04/84(R)
06/18/80(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/16/81(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
07/05/83(R)
06/04/80(R)
03/17/72(R)
07/17/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
12/04/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/80
06/18/87
07/19/82
02/01/80
07/02/92
04/03/84
07/05/82
07/02/92
12/15/83
01/20/82
11/04/81
02/1 8/8 1(M)
05/15/80
02/19/82
06/02/93
01/23/79(M)
07/16/84
01/16/87
07/02/81
07/02/92
07/05/82
07/02/81
07/15/92
07/15/92
08/09/00
07/02/80
07/02/81
09/01/77
10/16/84
12/04/85(M)
07/05/82
07/19/82
07/02/92
06/15/83
12/15/90
07/16/84
08/05/85
07/02/92
12/04/84
07/02/92
01/19/83
07/02/92
09/05/79
09/29/78
09/16/81
07/02/80
06/18/80
07/05/83
06/04/80
06/05/85
07/17/86
08/15/79
12/04/79
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
250333#
250334#
250149#
250335#
250150#
250336#
250042#
250215#
250253#
250216#
250337#
250217#
250129#
250338#
250105#
255221#
250066#
250339#
250218#
250073#
250106#
250219#
255222#
250220#
250340#
250341#
250221#
250152#
250254#
250222#
250172#
255223#
250342#
250044
250223#
250224#
250343#
250255#
250014#
250107#
250345#
250284#
250346#
250108#
250155#
250045#
250074#
250344#
250153#
250225#
250173#
250347#
250226#
255224#
Community Name
SOUTHBOROUGH, TOWN OF
SOUTHBRIDGE, TOWN OF
SOUTHWICK, TOWN OF
SPENCER, TOWN OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
STERLING, TOWN OF
STOCKBRIDGE, TOWN OF
STONEHAM, TOWN OF
STOUGHTON, TOWN OF
STOW, TOWN OF
STURBRIDGE, TOWN OF
SUDBURY, TOWN OF
SUNDERLAND, TOWN OF
SUTTON, TOWN OF
SWAMPSCOTT, TOWN OF
SWANSEA, TOWN OF
TAUNTON, CITY OF
TEMPLETON, TOWN OF
TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF
TISBURY, TOWN OF
TOPSFIELD, TOWN OF
TOWNSEND, TOWN OF
TRURO, TOWN OF
TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF
UPTON, TOWN OF
UXBRIDGE, TOWN OF
WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF
WALES, TOWN OF
WALPOLE, TOWN OF
WALTHAM, CITY OF
WARE, TOWN OF
WAREHAM, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WATERTOWN, TOWN OF
WAYLAND, CITY OF
WEBSTER, TOWN OF
WELLESLEY, TOWN OF
WELLFLEET, TOWN OF
WENHAM, TOWN OF
WEST BOYLSTON, TOWN OF
WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
WEST BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
WEST NEWBURY, TOWN OF
WEST SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
WEST STOCKBRIDGE, TOWN OF
WEST TISBURY, TOWN OF
WESTBOROUGH, TOWN OF
WESTFIELD, CITY OF
WESTFORD, TOWN OF
WESTHAMPTON, TOWN OF
WESTMINSTER, TOWN OF
WESTON, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
County
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/81(R)
03/15/82(R)
07/16/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
02/01/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/01/82(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/03/76(R)
08/06/71(R)
06/18/80(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/18/77(R)
06/15/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
04/20/73(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
06/01/83(R)
10/17/78(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
12/18/79(R)
08/17/81(R)
05/28/71(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/01/96(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/05/79(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
06/01/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/01/78(R)
06/15/83(R)
07/02/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/16/71(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/81
03/15/82
07/16/84
09/14/90
06/17/91
06/15/82
07/05/82
07/03/86
06/01/82
08/01/79
07/19/82
11/20/98
06/18/80
06/01/82
07/02/92
07/17/86
04/16/91
05/17/82
07/02/81
06/15/84
06/02/94
08/02/82
07/15/92
09/02/82
08/02/82
06/01/83
09/02/88
07/02/81
11/18/88
07/05/84
08/17/81
07/15/92
12/01/81
06/01/96(L)
09/30/80
02/19/86
06/16/93
09/05/79
07/02/92
08/19/91
08/02/90
06/15/82
06/01/82
06/15/79
10/11/79
06/01/82
07/20/98
05/15/80
05/01/78
06/15/83
07/02/79
07/19/82
07/02/80
07/15/92
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
255225#
250257#
250132#
250285#
250154#
250174#
250046#
250227#
250348#
250228#
250289#
250229#
250349#
250175#
250258#
250015#
Community Name
WESTWOOD, TOWN OF
WEYMOUTH, TOWN OF
WHATELY, TOWN OF
WHITMAN, TOWN OF
WILBRAHAM, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSBURG, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSTOWN, TOWN OF
WILMINGTON, TOWN OF
WINCHENDON, TOWN OF
WINCHESTER, TOWN OF
WINTHROP, TOWN OF
WOBURN, CITY OF
WORCESTER, CITY OF
WORTHINGTON, TOWN OF
WRENTHAM, TOWN OF
YARMOUTH, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
NORFOLK COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PLYMOUTH COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
NORFOLK COUNTY
BARNSTABLE
COUNTY
331
331
1
10
0
0
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/02/73(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/14/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/01/81(R)
07/05/77(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
10/08/76(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/05/82(R)
05/02/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/17/84
08/19/91
09/14/79
07/02/81
06/15/88
06/01/81
04/03/84
06/02/99
06/15/82
06/18/80
07/02/92
07/02/80
08/15/80
06/19/89
07/05/82
07/02/92
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
250134A
250068#
250023
250305#
250139A
250121
250146
250168A
250036A
250169A
250126
250101#
250040#
250128#
250151#
250043
250130
250131
250047
Community Name
"MASSACHUSETTS
BLANDFORD, TOWN OF
CHILMARK, TOWN OF
FLORIDA, TOWN OF
GARDNER, CITY OF
GRANVILLE, TOWN OF
LEYDEN, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWN OF
PELHAM, TOWN OF
PERU, TOWN OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
ROWE, TOWN OF
ROWLEY, TOWN OF
SAVOY, TOWN OF
SHUTESBURY, TOWN OF
TOLLAND, TOWN OF
TYRINGHAM, TOWN OF
WARWICK, TOWN OF
WENDELL, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
HAMPDEN COUNTY
DUKES COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
WORCESTER COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HAMPDEN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BERKSHIRE COUNTY
0
2
0
Hazard Area
Identified
07/26/74
10/15/85(F)
11/12/76
07/02/8 1(F)
08/30/74
02/07/75
11/22/74
06/28/74
11/01/74
11/01/74
08/20/76
08/05/86(F)
08/05/91(F)
06/18/80(F)
08/02/90(F)
1 1/29/74
01/24/75
01/17/75
1 1/22/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/26/75
12/06/75
11/12/77
07/02/81(8)
08/30/75
02/07/76
11/22/75
06/28/75
11/01/75
11/01/75
08/20/77
07/26/75
08/05/91(8)
02/21/76
04/04/76
1 1/29/75
01/24/76
01/17/76
1 1/22/75
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 19
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 19
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260749
260248#
260115#
260732#
260207B
260249#
260670#
260498#
260050#
260639#
260996
260994
26073 8#
260191#
260003#
2602 17#
260490#
260083#
260528
261027
26031 1#
260010#
26001 1#
260213#
260535#
260991
260306C
26025 IB
260392#
260705#
261043
260742#
260141#
260694#
260558
260393#
260098#
260342#
260263#
260886#
260012#
260013#
260312#
260627#
260099#
260666#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"MICHIGAN
ACME, TOWNSHIP OF
ADA, TOWNSHIP OF
ADRIAN, CITY OF
ADRIAN, TOWNSHIP OF
AKRON, TOWNSHIP OF
ALABASTER, TOWNSHIP OF
ALAIEDON, TOWNSHIP OF
ALBEE, TOWNSHIP OF
ALBION, CITY OF
ALBION, TOWNSHIP OF
ALCONA, TOWNSHIP OF
ALGANSEE, TOWNSHIP OF
ALGOMA, TOWNSHIP OF
ALGONAC, CITY OF
ALLEGAN, CITY OF
ALLEN PARK, CITY OF
ALLENDALE, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
ALMA, CITY OF
ALMENA, TOWNSHIP OF
ALMER, TOWNSHIP OF
ALMONT, VILLAGE OF
ALPENA, CITY OF
ALPENA, TOWNSHIP OF
ANN ARBOR, CITY OF
ANN ARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF
ARCADIA, TOWNSHIP OF
ARCADIA, TOWNSHIP OF
ARENAC, TOWNSHIP OF
ARGENTINE, TOWNSHIP OF
ARLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ARMADA, TOWNSHIP OF
ARMADA, VILLAGE OF
ASH, TOWNSHIP OF
ASHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
ATHENS, CITY OF
ATLAS, TOWNSHIP OF
AU SABLE, TOWNSHIP OF
AU TRAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
AUBURN HILLS, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUGRES, CITY OF
AUGRES, TOWNSHIP OF
AUGUSTA, VILLAGE OF
AUGUSTA, TOWNSHIP OF
BALDWIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BALTIMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
in the National Flood Program
County
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
KENT COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
IOSCO COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
GRATIOT COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
ALPENA COUNTY
ALPENA COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
IOSCO COUNTY
ALGER COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
IOSCO COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/18/86(R)
10/15/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
11/16/90(R)
01/01/92(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/15/82(R)
10/15/82(R)
07/25/97
06/19/97
01/03/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
05/04/89(R)
02/17/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/01/82(R)
02/11/83(R)
08/10/99
08/03/81(R)
11/19/82(R)
01/21/83(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
06/11/97
09/01/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/18/85(R)
11/15/00
05/17/90(R)
11/03/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/15/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
01/06/88(R)
06/18/87(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/29/98(R)
05/17/89(R)
05/17/89(R)
03/15/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
02/01/88(R)
07/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
10/15/80
07/19/82
11/16/90
01/01/92(L)
02/19/87
09/28/79(M)
10/16/97(L)
06/15/82
10/15/82
01/03/85
12/04/81
05/04/89
05/06/96
07/05/82
03/01/82
(NSFHA)
08/03/81
1 1/04/92
02/03/93
01/02/92
06/18/80
10/16/96
07/03/86(M)
01/02/81
07/18/85(M)
05/17/90
04/20/00
05/04/89
(NSFHA)
06/15/79
01/06/88
06/18/87
07/16/79
(NSFHA)
05/17/89
05/17/89
03/15/82
09/04/85(M)
06/02/94
07/18/85(M)
Page 1 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260529#
260019#
260643#
260551#
26005 1#
260020#
260685#
260374#
260796
260646#
260357#
260052#
260142#
260096B
260566A
260481 A
260032#
26003 1#
260292
260143#
260330A
260733#
260298A
260256#
260136A
260135
260713#
260772
260590#
260168#
260714#
260780
261005
260339#
260712#
260169#
260430#
260795
260056#
260386#
261031
260389#
260186#
260466#
260033#
260783
260335#
260467#
260815#
260218#
260375#
260884#
Community Name
BANGOR, CITY OF
BANGOR, TOWNSHIP OF
BANKS, TOWNSHIP OF
BARAGA, VILLAGE OF
BATTLE CREEK, CITY OF
BAY CITY, CITY OF
BAY DE NOC, TOWNSHIP OF
BAY MILLS, TOWNSHIP OF
BAY, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAUGRAND, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEDFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BEDFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BELDING, CITY OF
BELLEVUE, VILLAGE OF
BENONA, TOWNSHIP OF
BENTON HARBOR, CITY OF
BENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BERKLEY, CITY OF
BERLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BERRIEN SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
BERRIEN, TOWNSHIP OF
BESSEMER, CITY OF
BEVERLY HILLS, VILLAGE OF
BIG RAPIDS, CITY OF
BIG RAPIDS, TOWNSHIP OF
BINGHAM FARMS, VILLAGE OF
BINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BIRCH RUN, VILLAGE OF
BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF
BLACKMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
BLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
BLENDON, TOWNSHIP OF
BLISSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, CITY OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
BOARDMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
BOIS BLANC, TOWNSHIP OF
BOYNE CITY, CITY OF
BRAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BRANDON, TOWNSHIP OF
BREEN, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGEPORT, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGETON, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGMAN, CITY OF
BRIGHTON, CITY OF
BROOKLYN, VILLAGE OF
BROOKS, TOWNSHIP OF
BROOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
BROWNSTOWN, CHARTERED TOWNSHIP OF
BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF
BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
VAN BUREN COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
ANTRIM COUNTY
BARAGA COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
CHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
GOGEBIC COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
OTTAWA COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
KALKASKA COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/04/89(R)
07/02/79(R)
09/01/88(R)
08/04/88(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/01/78(R)
12/18/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/01/92(R)
02/01/86(R)
02/02/83(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/15/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
02/29/80(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
04/30/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/88(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/18/87(R)
06/01/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
12/18/84(R)
01/06/88(R)
12/22/97
07/19/82(R)
07/05/84(R)
01/06/83(R)
03/23/93
09/30/87(R)
07/19/82(R)
05/16/78(R)
12/17/99
09/18/86(R)
03/15/84(R)
09/04/86(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/05/88(R)
06/18/82(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/05/91(R)
08/16/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
1 1/20/96(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/04/89
06/18/96
09/01/88(L)
01/03/97
04/04/83
06/18/96
06/08/98
07/03/86(M)
(NSFHA)
05/01/92(L)
06/18/96
02/02/83
04/20/00
06/17/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
05/15/78
04/03/78
(NSFHA)
04/20/00
04/30/86(M)
08/16/88
09/01/86(L)
06/15/79
09/01/86(L)
09/01/88(L)
01/03/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/15/80
12/18/84
(NSFHA)
02/17/88
07/05/84
11/19/87
08/05/77
(NSFHA)
07/19/82
06/08/98
09/18/86(M)
10/16/97
03/05/90
11/15/79
(NSFHA)
06/01/82
1 1/03/89
01/07/98
09/06/95
09/30/88(M)
Page 2 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260554#
260555#
260499#
26065 1#
261010
260762#
260960
260719
260193B
260287#
261024
260601 A
260247#
260693#
260300#
260998
260734#
260219#
260682
260548#
260187#
260814#
260004#
260257#
260677#
260363#
26064 1#
260659#
260724
260625#
260509B
260426#
260057#
260790
260065#
26041 1#
260343#
260058#
260938#
260798
260500#
260591#
260829#
260120#
260258#
260203#
260824#
Community Name
BUCHANAN, CITY OF
BUCHANAN, TOWNSHIP OF
BUENA VISTA, TOWNSHIP OF
BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BURNS, TOWNSHIP OF
BURNSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
BURT, TOWNSHIP OF
BURTCHVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
BURTON, CITY OF
BUTMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
BYRON, VILLAGE OF
CADILLAC, CITY OF
CALEDONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CALEDONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CALIFORNIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CANNON, TOWNSHIP OF
CANTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CARMEL, TOWNSHIP OF
CARP LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
CARROLLTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CASCADE CHARTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CASCO, TOWNSHIP OF
CASEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
CASEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CASSOPOLIS, VILLAGE OF
CASTLETON, TOWNSHIP OF
CEDARVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER LINE, CITY OF
CENTER VILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTREVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CHARLESTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CHARLEVOIX, CITY OF
CHARLEVOIX, TOWNSHIP OF
CHARLOTTE, CITY OF
CHASSELL, TOWNSHIP OF
CHATHAM, VILLAGE OF
CHEBOYGAN, CITY OF
CHERRY GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRY VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESANING, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESANING, VILLAGE OF
CHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
CHIKAMING, TOWNSHIP OF
CHINA, TOWNSHIP OF
CHIPPEWA, TOWNSHIP OF
County
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
ALGER COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GLAD WIN COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
WEXFORD COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
ONTONAGON
COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
HOUGHTON COUNTY
ALGER COUNTY
CHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
WEXFORD COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/16/93(R)
03/02/98(R)
07/05/84(R)
07/02/87(R)
12/22/97
12/19/96(R)
11/06/96
05/25/84(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/01/80(R)
07/30/99
02/01/91(R)
03/18/96(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
08/22/97
09/16/88(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
01/31/79(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/15/83(R)
1 1/06/9 1(R)
06/04/80(R)
12/01/77(R)
01/01/92(R)
06/01/79(R)
05/17/88(R)
06/24/93(R)
03/16/88(R)
02/01/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/15/82(R)
02/11/83(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/05/90(R)
08/10/79(R)
03/16/88(R)
07/28/99(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/20/82(R)
1 1/20/9 1(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/07/98(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/16/93
03/02/98
10/16/97
07/02/87(M)
12/19/96
(NSFHA)
08/01/86(L)
08/01/80
02/01/91(L)
08/03/98
07/02/81
05/17/82
09/16/88(M)
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
10/16/97
1 1/06/9 1(M)
06/04/80
12/01/77
01/01/92(L)
06/01/79(M)
05/17/88
11/04/92
(NSFHA)
02/01/86(L)
09/30/88(M)
04/15/82
02/11/83(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
12/05/90
08/10/79(M)
03/16/88
08/03/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/16/97
1 1/20/9 1(M)
07/03/78
06/01/78
08/01/78
01/07/98
Page 3 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
26044M
260629#
260560#
260759#
260472#
260170
260194#
260482
260663#
260302A
260121#
260437#
260667#
260819#
260813#
260826#
260903
260556#
260034#
260510#
26051 1#
260507A
260473#
260427#
260946
260423#
260512A
260652#
260428#
26049 1#
260768#
260602#
260196#
260259#
260981
260745
260515A
260468#
260028B
260074#
260664#
260060#
26063 1#
26022 1#
260220#
260350#
260816#
260434#
260717
26043 8#
260756
260088#
Community Name
CHOCOLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARE, CITY OF
CLARENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARK, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARKSTON, CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF
CLAWSON, CITY OF
CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
CLAYBANKS, TOWNSHIP OF
CLAYTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLEVELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, VILLAGE OF
CLIO, CITY OF
COE, TOWNSHIP OF
COLD WATER, CITY OF
COLDWATER, TOWNSHIP OF
COLFAX, TOWNSHIP OF
COLOMA, CITY OF
COLOMA, TOWNSHIP OF
COLON, TOWNSHIP OF
COLON, VILLAGE OF
COLUMBUS, TOWNSHIP OF
COMMERCE, TOWNSHIP OF
COMSTOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
CONCORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CONCORD, VILLAGE OF
CONSTANTINE, VILLAGE OF
CONVIS, TOWNSHIP OF
COOPER, TOWNSHIP OF
COOPERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CORNELL, TOWNSHIP OF
CORUNNA, CITY OF
COTTRELLVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
COVERT, TOWNSHIP OF
CROCKERY, TOWNSHIP OF
CROSS VILLAGE, TOWNSHIP OF
CROSSWELL, CITY OF
CROTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CRYSTAL LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
DAVISON, CITY OF
DAVISON, TOWNSHIP OF
DE WITT, CITY OF
DE WITT, TOWNSHIP OF
DEARBORN HEIGHTS, CITY OF
DEARBORN, CITY OF
DEEP RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
DEERFIELD, VILLAGE OF
DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
DELHI, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
County
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
CLARE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
BENZIE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/04/87(R)
02/05/92(R)
02/18/83(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/02/83(R)
06/19/76(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/18/87(R)
10/02/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/03/80(R)
07/16/91(R)
08/16/96(R)
08/16/96(R)
05/01/94(R)
01/18/80(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/16/88(R)
03/02/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/11/95
03/01/82(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/11/83(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/02/83(R)
12/18/86(R)
01/17/86(R)
09/17/80(R)
04/03/78(R)
12/17/96
09/04/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/19/89(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
05/02/83(R)
04/20/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/07/98(R)
08/07/95
05/25/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
12/18/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/04/87
02/05/92
02/18/83(M)
11/04/92
03/02/83
(NSFHA)
01/22/82
(NSFHA)
08/01/80
09/01/86(L)
08/17/98
07/19/82
09/03/80
01/07/98
08/16/96
08/16/96
01/18/80(M)
02/15/84
09/16/88
09/16/88
09/01/86(L)
03/16/81
11/17/82
03/01/82
08/19/86(M)
02/11/83(M)
09/28/79(M)
03/02/83
06/08/98
01/17/86
09/17/80
04/03/78
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
09/30/88(M)
06/19/89(M)
09/29/78
06/15/79
12/18/79
06/18/80
05/06/96
05/06/96
08/19/85(M)
01/07/98
05/13/77
(NSFHA)
04/01/81
(NSFHA)
11/16/90
Page 4 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260066#
260817#
260775#
260222#
260536#
260333#
260549#
260055
260803#
260144#
260313#
260746
260197#
260105#
260372#
260089#
260100#
260727
260067#
260391#
260999
260653#
260223#
260364#
260680#
260776#
260751
260699#
260569
260113#
260725#
260449#
260561#
260605
260765
260752#
261042
260145#
26006 1#
260387#
26002 1#
26026 1#
260735#
260800
260327#
260810#
260773
260957
26078 1#
Community Name
DELTA, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
DENVER, TOWNSHIP OF
DETOUR, TOWNSHIP OF
DETROIT, CITY OF
DEXTER, TOWNSHIP OF
DIMONDALE, VILLAGE OF
DOUGLAS, VILLAGE OF
DOWAGIAC, CITY OF
DRUMMOND ISLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNDEE, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNDEE, VILLAGE OF
EAST BAY, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST CHINA, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST GRAND RAPIDS, CITY OF
EAST JORDAN, CITY OF
EAST LANSING, CITY OF
EAST TAW AS, CITY OF
EASTON, TOWNSHIP OF
EATON RAPIDS, CITY OF
EATON RAPIDS, TOWNSHIP OF
EAU CLAIRE, VILLAGE OF
ECKFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
ECORSE, CITY OF
EDWARDSBURG, VILLAGE OF
EGELSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ELBA, TOWNSHIP OF
ELK RAPIDS, TOWNSHIP OF
ELK RAPIDS,VILLAGE OF
ELKTON, VILLAGE OF
ELMWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
ELSIE, VILLAGE OF
ELY, TOWNSHIP OF
EMMETT, TOWNSHIP OF
EMPIRE, CITY OF
EMPIRE, TOWNSHIP OF
ENSIGN, TOWNSHIP OF
ENSLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
ERIE, TOWNSHIP OF
ESCANABA, CITY OF
ESCANABA, TOWNSHIP OF
ESSEXVILLE, CITY OF
ESTRAL BEACH, VILLAGE OF
EUREKA, TOWNSHIP OF
EVANGELINE, TOWNSHIP OF
EVART, CITY OF
EVART, TOWNSHIP OF
EVELINE, TOWNSHIP OF
EWING, TOWNSHIP OF
FABIUS, TOWNSHIP OF
County
EATON COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
IOSCO COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
ANTRIM COUNTY
ANTRIM COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONTCALM COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/02/8 1(R)
07/16/91(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/03/0 1(R)
04/18/83(R)
07/19/82(R)
12/18/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/03/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/25/84(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/15/83(R)
08/20/97
08/19/86(R)
05/01/78(R)
04/20/79(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/25/84(R)
02/02/83(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/01/88(R)
06/01/83(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/18/86(R)
12/17/99
09/01/78(R)
09/01/77(R)
12/18/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
11/15/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/02/96
09/30/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/02/99
01/07/98
1 1/20/00
04/17/84
02/19/87
09/30/80
02/01/80
(NSFHA)
1 1/20/00
04/20/00
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
07/03/78
09/03/80
07/19/82
08/01/80
06/02/94
(NSFHA)
10/15/82
12/15/83
08/19/86(M)
05/01/78
04/20/79(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/04/88(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
02/02/83
07/16/87(M)
09/01/88(L)
06/01/83
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
04/20/00
06/08/98
06/08/98
06/18/96
04/20/00
11/15/84
(NSFHA)
05/17/93
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/88(M)
Page 5 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260804#
260628#
260172#
260171#
260075#
260394#
260262
260184#
260130B
260224#
260076#
260395#
260077#
260396#
260062#
260771
260633#
260198#
260439#
260022#
260188#
260029#
260325#
260122#
260657#
260167#
260818#
261008
260146#
260562A
260265A
261028
260293#
260294
260005#
260225
260763#
260753
260766#
260469#
260078#
260589#
260226#
261044
260267#
260604#
260301A
260988
260397#
260785
260455
260268#
260255#
260079#
Community Name
FAIRBANKS, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRHAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF
FARMINGTON HILLS, CITY OF
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FENTON, CITY OF
FENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FERNDALE, CITY OF
FERRYSBURG, CITY OF
FILER, TOWNSHIP OF
FLAT ROCK, CITY OF
FLINT, CITY OF
FLINT, TOWNSHIP OF
FLUSHING, CITY OF
FLUSHING, TOWNSHIP OF
FORD RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
FORESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
FORK, TOWNSHIP OF
FORT GRATIOT, TOWNSHIP OF
FOWLERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FRANKENLUST, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKENMUTH, CITY OF
FRANKFORT, CITY OF
FRANKLIN, VILLAGE OF
FRASER, CITY OF
FRASER, TOWNSHIP OF
FREMONT, CITY OF
FREMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
FREMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
FRENCHTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRENDONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
FRUITLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
FULTON, TOWNSHIP OF
GAINES, TOWNSHIP OF
GAINES, VILLAGE OF
GANGES, TOWNSHIP OF
GARDEN CITY, CITY OF
GARDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GARFIELD, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
GARFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GARFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GENESEE, TOWNSHIP OF
GEORGETOWN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
GIBRALTAR, CITY OF
GIRARD, TOWNSHIP OF
GLADSTONE, CITY OF
GLEN ARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF
GOLDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GOODLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
GOODRICH, VILLAGE OF
GORE, TOWNSHIP OF
GOURLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAND BEACH, VILLAGE OF
GRAND BLANC, CITY OF
GRAND BLANC, TOWNSHIP OF
County
DELTA COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
BENZIE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
GRATIOT COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESSE COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
MACKINAC COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/87(R)
01/06/88(R)
02/01/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/31/83(R)
03/01/78(R)
07/01/91(R)
12/01/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
11/01/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/04/86(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/15/78(R)
02/19/87(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/02/82(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
12/01/81(R)
04/02/79(R)
11/13/81(R)
08/10/79(R)
10/16/91(R)
12/22/97
01/19/78(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/01(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/21/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
12/29/78(R)
12/18/86(R)
12/18/86(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/02/80(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
01/16/01
09/15/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/06/97
09/29/78(R)
09/18/87(R)
10/23/95
02/15/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/08/98
01/01/88(L)
1 1/08/99
07/16/80
01/16/81
01/16/81
(NSFHA)
03/01/78
07/01/91(L)
12/01/81
01/02/81
11/01/79
06/15/79
02/04/81
06/08/98
(NSFHA)
06/19/97
03/26/82
02/19/87
06/18/96
10/16/97
03/18/91
12/01/81
04/02/79
06/18/96
1 0/02/8 1(M)
01/07/98
04/20/00
08/19/87(M)
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
12/18/79
(NSFHA)
12/18/79
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
(NSFHA)
1 1/20/00
05/04/89
12/02/80
02/05/92
06/15/79
06/08/98
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
09/29/78
(NSFHA)
02/15/78
07/02/80
08/01/80
Page 6 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260269#
260270#
260068#
260106#
26027 1#
260610#
261004
260901
260440#
260951
26000 1#
260158#
260483A
260947#
260227#
260229#
260230#
260250#
260231
260228
260992
260614
260035#
260118#
260134#
260023#
260827
260272#
260123#
260543A
260955
260484A
260777
260784#
2603 14#
260648#
260984#
260778
260274A
260289
260925#
260914
260489#
260485A
261011
260650#
260086#
260006#
260492#
260474#
Community Name
GRAND HAVEN, CITY OF
GRAND HAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAND LEDGE, CITY OF
GRAND RAPIDS, CITY OF
GRANDVILLE, CITY OF
GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAYLING, CITY OF
GREEN OAK, TOWNSHIP OF
GREEN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
GREENBUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GROSSE ILE, TOWNSHIP OF
GROSSE POINTE FARMS, CITY OF
GROSSE POINTE PARK, CITY OF
GROSSE POINTE SHORES, VILLAGE OF
GROSSE POINTE WOODS, CITY OF
GROSSE POINTE, CITY OF
GROVELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
GUN PLAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
HAGAR, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HANDY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARBOR SPRINGS, CITY OF
HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRISVILLE, CITY OF
HARRISVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
HART, CITY OF
HART, TOWNSHIP OF
HARTLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HASTINGS, CITY OF
HASTINGS, TOWNSHIP OF
HAY, TOWNSHIP OF
HAYES, TOWNSHIP OF
HAYNES, TOWNSHIP OF
HAZEL PARK, CITY OF
HAZELTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF
HERSEY, VILLAGE OF
HESPERIA, VILLAGE OF
HIGGINS, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HILLSDALE, CITY OF
HOLLAND, CITY OF
HOLLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HOLLY, TOWNSHIP OF
County
OTTAWA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
CHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
KEWEENAW COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
MONTCALM COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
WEXFORD COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
GLAD WIN COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
ROSCOMMON
COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
HILLSDALE COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/78(R)
01/16/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/17/79(R)
09/16/82(R)
01/18/89(R)
10/27/97
06/25/92(R)
10/16/84(R)
03/11/96
09/30/88(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/30/97(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/10/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/01/88(R)
06/11/97
06/23/99
12/01/77(R)
02/19/86(R)
12/17/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
02/07/90
05/16/77(R)
05/05/81(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/05/96
09/01/86(R)
01/16/87(R)
05/17/89(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/31/97(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/01/92(R)
1 1/30/78(R)
04/02/98(R)
04/27/94
09/04/9 1(R)
08/01/86(R)
12/22/97
01/18/84(R)
01/06/88(R)
11/15/78(R)
12/01/83(R)
02/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/15/78
01/16/81
01/02/81
1 1/05/82
09/16/82
01/18/89
(NSFHA)
10/16/84
02/03/93
1 1/02/83
08/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
08/01/80
12/10/82(M)
01/03/79
01/03/79
(NSFHA)
09/01/88(L)
12/01/77
02/19/86
12/17/87
06/18/96
12/25/81
05/05/81
09/27/85(M)
09/01/86(M)
(NSFHA)
09/20/96
02/18/81
06/15/81
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
05/01/92(L)
(NSFHA)
1 1/05/97
09/04/91
08/01/86(L)
01/18/84
01/06/88
09/28/90
09/28/90
02/01/88(L)
Page 7 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260587#
260457
260654#
260989
26033 1#
260681#
260799#
26044 1#
26041 8A
260116#
260807#
260493#
260792
260723
260415#
260545#
260147#
260337#
260475#
260526#
260660
260232#
260097#
260832#
260199#
260063#
260103#
260081#
260403#
260354B
260820#
260273#
260802#
261001
260355A
261007
2603 15#
260429#
260658#
260173#
260915
260107#
260594A
260361
260064A
260501#
260552
260950
260419A
260588#
Community Name
HOLLY, VILLAGE OF
HOLMES, TOWNSHIP OF
HOMER, TOWNSHIP OF
HOMER, TOWNSHIP OF
HOMER, VILLAGE OF
HOPE, TOWNSHIP OF
HOUGHTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HOWELL, CITY OF
HUBBARDSTON, VILLAGE OF
HUDSON, CITY OF
HUDSON, TOWNSHIP OF
HUDSONVILLE, CITY OF
HUME, TOWNSHIP OF
HUNTINGTON WOODS, CITY OF
HURON, TOWNSHIP OF
HURON, TOWNSHIP OF
IDA, TOWNSHIP OF
IMLAY CITY, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
INDIANFIELDS, TOWNSHIP OF
INGALLSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FIRM 9-28-79
INKSTER, CITY OF
IONIA, CITY OF
IONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
IRA, TOWNSHIP OF
IRON MOUNTAIN, CITY OF
IRON RIVER, CITY OF
IRONWOOD, CITY OF
IRONWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
IRVING, TOWNSHIP OF
ISABELLA, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, CITY OF
JAMES, TOWNSHIP OF
JAMESTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
JOHNSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
JUNIATA, TOWNSHIP OF
KALAMAZOO, CITY OF
KALAMAZOO, TOWNSHIP OF
KAWKAWLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
KEEGO HARBOR, CITY OF
KENOCKEE, TOWNSHIP OF
KENTWOOD, CITY OF
KIMBALL, TOWNSHIP OF
KINDERHOOK, TOWNSHIP OF
KINGSFORD, CITY OF
KOCHVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
L'ANSE, VILLAGE OF
LAINGSBURG, CITY OF
LAKE ODESSA, VILLAGE OF
LAKE ORION, VILLAGE OF
County
OAKLAND COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MIDLAND COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
KEWEENAW COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
GOGEBIC COUNTY
GOGEBIC COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
BARAGA COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/84(R)
07/28/95
09/28/79(R)
05/14/97
05/03/82(R)
02/06/84(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/01/95(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/04/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
03/16/84(R)
04/02/92(R)
10/17/86(R)
01/21/83(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/10/83(R)
02/01/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/02/79(R)
11/02/83(R)
05/02/99(R)
03/04/80(R)
10/16/91(R)
03/04/9 1(R)
07/17/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
01/01/92(R)
04/16/91(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
10/27/97
04/02/86(R)
12/22/97
05/01/85(R)
06/15/82(R)
02/01/79(R)
12/01/82(R)
05/23/94
11/18/81(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/19/97
06/23/75
01/19/83(R)
04/01/88(R)
04/10/96(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/04/84
09/28/79(M)
05/03/82
02/06/84(M)
11/04/92
07/19/00
06/01/95(L)
11/04/81
1 1/04/92
12/04/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/02/92
10/17/86
04/20/00
07/16/81
05/16/83
02/01/86(L)
03/02/79(M)
11/02/83
05/02/99
03/04/80
10/16/91(M)
03/04/91
07/17/78
07/01/87(L)
01/01/92(L)
01/07/98
02/08/80
10/16/97
04/02/86(M)
09/30/92
06/15/94
06/18/96
12/01/82
11/18/81
08/05/85(M)
04/16/76
10/16/97
04/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
09/29/86(M)
09/16/81
Page 8 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260030A
260036#
260254#
260691
260908
260159#
260253#
260090#
260632#
260112#
260435#
260148#
260297
260722
260668
260114B
260760
261014
260930
260655#
260906
26009 1#
26071 8#
260234#
260014
260037#
260828#
260398#
260409#
260748
260233#
26067 1#
260715#
260782#
260108#
260150#
261032
260764
260675
260445#
260174
260316#
260131#
260132#
260595#
260644#
260891#
260384A
Community Name
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKETON, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKETOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
LANSING, CITY OF
LANSING, TOWNSHIP OF
LAPEER, CITY OF
LAPEER, TOWNSHIP OF
LASALLE, TOWNSHIP OF
LATHRUP VILLAGE, CITY OF
LEE, TOWNSHIP OF
LEE, TOWNSHIP OF
LEELANAU, TOWNSHIP OF
LELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
LENOX, TOWNSHIP OF
LEONI, TOWNSHIP OF
LEROY, TOWNSHIP OF
LEROY, TOWNSHIP OF
LESLIE, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN PARK, CITY OF
LINCOLN, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN, TOWNSHIP OF
LINDEN, CITY OF
LITCHFIELD,CITY OF
LITTLE TRAVERSE, TOWNSHIP OF
LIVONIA, CITY OF
LOCKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOCKPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWELL, CITY OF
LUNA PIER, CITY OF
LYON, TOWNSHIP OF
MACKINAC ISLAND, CITY OF
MACKINAW CITY, VILLAGE OF
MACOMB, TOWNSHIP OF
MADISON HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MANCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
MANISTEE, CITY OF
MANISTEE, TOWNSHIP OF
MANISTIQUE, CITY OF
MAPLE GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
MAPLE GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
MAPLE RAPIDS, VILLAGE OF
County
BENZIE COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
HILLSDALE COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
KENT COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
CHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
SCHOOLCRAFT
COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/05/89(R)
11/01/79(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/16/88(R)
06/09/93
04/03/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
02/16/90(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/19/76(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/02/86(R)
03/18/87(R)
01/15/98
05/11/95
03/01/87(R)
04/19/93
08/10/79(R)
01/15/88(R)
11/17/82(R)
02/21/96
03/01/78(R)
02/21/96(R)
06/16/86(R)
02/04/87(R)
12/18/86(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
08/10/79(R)
02/17/89(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/16/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
03/28/01
03/18/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/15/82(R)
03/18/87(R)
11/15/89(R)
12/05/90(R)
02/01/86(R)
10/16/97(R)
09/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/05/89(M)
11/01/79
04/03/78
(NSFHA)
04/03/78
06/04/80
11/16/90
02/04/81
01/02/92
02/16/90
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/02/86(M)
(NSFHA)
03/01/87(L)
08/10/79(M)
01/15/88(M)
11/17/82
03/01/78
09/27/91
11/19/80
02/04/87
(NSFHA)
11/04/81
03/01/82(M)
02/17/89
09/30/88(M)
05/16/83
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/04/81
(NSFHA)
06/15/82
03/18/87
11/15/89
12/05/90
02/01/86(L)
10/16/97
09/01/86(L)
Page 9 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260609
260563#
260200#
260808
260328A
260959
261022
260716#
260750
260758
260053#
260642#
260793
260958
260201
260092#
260687#
260911
260436#
260322A
261026
260698
260692
260202#
260513#
260138#
260702#
260093#
260024#
261009
260458#
260275#
260952
260356A
260140#
261019
260151#
260152#
2603 17B
260929
260637#
260358#
260153#
260154#
260160#
261000
Community Name
MARATHON, TOWNSHIP OF
MARENGO, TOWNSHIP OF
MARINE CITY, CITY OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARION, VILLAGE OF
MARLETTE, CITY OF
MARLETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
MARQUETTE, CITY OF
MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF
MARTIN, VILLAGE OF
MARTINY, TOWNSHIP OF
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MASON, CITY OF
MASONVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
MATTESON, TOWNSHIP OF
MAYFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
MCKINLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
MEADE, TOWNSHIP OF
MECOSTA, TOWNSHIP OF
MELLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
MEMPHIS, CITY OF
MENDON, TOWNSHIP OF
MENOMINEE, CITY OF
MENOMINEE, TOWNSHIP OF
MERIDIAN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
MERRITT, TOWNSHIP OF
METAMORA, VILLAGE OF
MEYER, TOWNSHIP OF
MICHIANA, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLE BRANCH, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MIDLAND, CITY OF
MIKADO, TOWNSHIP OF
MILAN, CITY OF
MILAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MILFORD, VILLAGE OF
MILLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
MILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
MONITOR, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, CITY OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTAGUE, CITY OF
MONTEREY, TOWNSHIP OF
County
LAPEER COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
MIDLAND COUNTY
ALCONA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
ANTRIM COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/22/97(R)
05/17/82(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/15/88(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/04/96
05/06/98
09/30/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/18/86(R)
04/01/82(R)
02/11/83(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/23/96
06/08/84(R)
10/15/82(R)
03/31/82(R)
12/21/93
02/16/90(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/10/99
09/04/86(R)
06/09/93
05/04/88(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/07/92(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/15/78(R)
12/22/97
08/19/97(R)
05/01/78(R)
04/26/96
08/01/86(R)
06/15/84(R)
04/02/98
08/02/82(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/21/84(R)
04/26/95
02/02/83(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/15/77(R)
04/03/78(R)
05/01/78(R)
08/20/97
Current Effective
Map
05/17/82
08/01/79
(NSFHA)
02/01/87(L)
12/02/94
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/01/82
02/11/83(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/15/82
06/08/98
02/16/90
07/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/04/88
07/02/87(M)
08/01/78
03/28/80
08/09/00
06/18/96
08/19/97
05/01/78
08/01/86(L)
12/05/95
04/20/00
04/20/00
12/21/84(M)
02/02/83
06/18/96
04/20/00
04/20/00
05/01/78
Page 10 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260399#
260443#
260585A
260124#
260626
260400#
260104#
260916#
26040 1#
260002
260162#
260161#
260163#
260688#
260902#
260125#
260038#
260039#
260521A
260446#
260340
260697#
260647#
26004 IB
260040#
260338
260164#
260635#
260580#
260235#
260669#
260165#
260424A
260769
260821#
260514#
261002
260175#
260323
260476#
261006
260069#
260070#
260276#
260407#
260309#
260477#
260042B
260797#
Community Name
MONTROSE, TOWNSHIP OF
MORAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MORLEY, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT CLEMENS, CITY OF
MOUNT MORRIS, CITY OF
MOUNT MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, CITY OF
MUIR, VILLAGE OF
MUNDY, TOWNSHIP OF
MUNISING, CITY OF
MUSKEGON HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MUSKEGON, CITY OF
MUSKEGON, TOWNSHIP OF
NAHMA, TOWNSHIP OF
NASHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEW BALTIMORE, CITY OF
NEW BUFFALO, CITY OF
NEW BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW HAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW HAVEN, VILLAGE OF
NEWAYGO, CITY OF
NEWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWTON, TOWNSHIP OF
NILES, TOWNSHIP OF
NILES,CITY OF
NORTH BRANCH, VILLAGE OF
NORTH MUSKEGON, CITY OF
NORTHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTHPORT, VILLAGE OF
NORTHVILLE, CITY OF
NORTHVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTON SHORES, CITY OF
NORVELL, TOWNSHIP OF
NORWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
NOTTAWA, TOWNSHIP OF
NOTTAWA, TOWNSHIP OF
NOVESTA, TOWNSHIP OF
NO VI, CITY OF
OAK PARK, CITY OF
OAKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
OLIVE, TOWNSHIP OF
OLIVET, CITY OF
ONEIDA, TOWNSHIP OF
ONEKAMA, TOWNSHIP OF
ONTONAGON, TOWNSHIP OF
ONTONAGON, VILLAGE OF
ORCHARD LAKE VILLAGE, CITY OF
ORONOKO, TOWNSHIP OF
OSCEOLA, TOWNSHIP OF
County
GENESEE COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
MECOSTA COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
ALGER COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
ONTONAGON
COUNTY
ONTONAGON
COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/80(R)
12/18/86(R)
07/16/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/18/83(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/16/82(R)
11/06/96(R)
11/01/79(R)
05/25/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/01/77(R)
08/01/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/06/99(R)
09/01/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/01/88(R)
09/17/80(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/16/87(R)
04/02/98
05/02/77(R)
11/16/90(R)
03/02/89(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/02/91(R)
03/02/89(R)
10/27/97
04/03/78(R)
09/28/78(R)
12/23/82(R)
12/22/97
1 1/09/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
01/07/83(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/02/95
11/20/00
07/16/87(M)
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
02/04/81
01/07/98
11/06/96
11/01/79
(NSFHA)
02/18/81
06/01/77
02/15/84
06/08/98
12/06/99
09/01/78
12/04/79
12/04/79
04/01/88(L)
09/17/80
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
06/03/86(M)
07/16/87
05/02/77
11/16/90
03/02/89
12/06/99
09/16/81
11/18/77
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
01/07/98
03/02/89
05/03/93
(NSFHA)
12/01/82
1 1/09/79(M)
07/16/81
05/01/78
09/01/86(L)
1 1/02/83
01/07/83(M)
06/17/86(M)
09/30/88(M)
Page 11 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260101#
260736
260007B
260740#
261003
260362
2603 18#
260596#
260809#
260737
260830#
260185#
260598A
260564#
260747
260183#
260277#
260582A
260288#
260072#
260607#
260025#
260623#
260109#
260008B
260431 A
260606
260236#
260237#
260923
260177#
260290C
260204#
260672#
260779
260278#
260577#
260574#
26083 1#
260026#
26071 1#
260442#
260997
260786#
260155#
26073 1#
260910
260410#
260755
Community Name
OSCODA, TOWNSHIP OF
OSHTEMO, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
OTSEGO, CITY OF
OTSEGO, TOWNSHIP OF
OTTER LAKE, VILLAGE OF
OVID, TOWNSHIP OF
OVID, VILLAGE OF
OWOSSO, CITY OF
OWOSSO, TOWNSHIP OF
PALMYRA, TOWNSHIP OF
PARADISE, TOWNSHIP OF
PARK, TOWNSHIP OF
PAW PAW, VILLAGE OF
PENNFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
PENNINSULA, TONWHIP OF
PENTWATER, TOWNSHIP OF
PENTWATER, VILLAGE OF
PERE MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PETOSKEY, CITY OF
PINCONNING, CITY OF
PINCONNING, TOWNSHIP OF
PITTSFIELD, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
PLAINWELL, CITY OF
PLEASANT PLAINS, TOWNSHIP OF
PLEASANT RIDGE, CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
POLKTON, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
PONTIAC, CITY OF
PORT AUSTIN, TOWNSHIP OF
PORT HURON, CITY OF
PORT HURON, TOWNSHIP OF
PORT SANILAC, VILLAGE OF
PORT SHELDON, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTAGE, CITY OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
PORTLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTSMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
POTTERVILLE, CITY OF
PUTNAM, TOWNSHIP OF
QUINCY, TOWNSHIP OF
RABER, TOWNSHIP OF
RAISINVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
RAVENNA, TOWNSHIP OF
RAY, TOWNSHIP OF
READING, TOWNSHIP OF
READMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
County
IOSCO COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
OTTAWA COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
OCEANA COUNTY
OCEANA COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
HILLSDALE COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
10/27/97
06/30/97
08/02/82(R)
03/01/82(R)
10/20/99(R)
05/25/84(R)
05/04/92(R)
05/15/78(R)
01/05/79(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/18/86(R)
03/01/78(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/25/76(R)
10/29/82(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/02/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
1 1/30/78(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/31/94
08/15/79(R)
01/01/92(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
04/15/88(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/16/83(R)
05/01/84(R)
06/16/92(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/06/84(R)
07/25/97
09/30/88(R)
08/02/82(R)
05/17/89(R)
06/09/93
03/27/96
12/18/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/01/82
(NSFHA)
07/03/85(M)
09/30/88(M)
10/27/97
03/02/93
03/01/82
10/20/99
(NSFHA)
05/04/92(M)
05/15/78
01/05/79(M)
10/15/82
(NSFHA)
03/01/78
05/15/78
07/03/85(M)
04/20/00
10/29/82(M)
06/18/96
06/18/96
05/15/91
01/02/81
07/18/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
01/05/96
01/05/96
08/15/79
09/30/95
12/01/78
09/04/91
(NSFHA)
05/15/78
05/16/83
05/01/84
06/16/92(M)
06/18/96
09/28/79(M)
12/16/88
09/30/88(M)
04/20/00
05/17/89(M)
10/28/77
(NSFHA)
Page 12 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260382A
260238#
260453
260743#
261023
260402
260885
261025
260239#
260240#
260913
26047 1#
260326#
26024 1#
260422#
260995
260729
260909
260624#
260178
260043#
260789#
260522
260656#
260189#
260190#
260636#
260215#
260787
260791
26042 1C
260305#
260009#
260059#
260537#
260572#
260985
260757#
260126#
260649#
260788
260822#
261020
260523A
260280B
260015#
260987
Community Name
REDDING, TOWNSHIP OF
REDFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
REPUBLIC, TOWNSHIP OF
REYNOLDS, TOWNSHIP OF
RICH, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
RIVER ROUGE, CITY OF
RIVERVIEW, CITY OF
ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCHESTER HILLS, CITY OF
ROCHESTER, CITY OF
ROCKWOOD, CITY OF
ROLLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSCOMMON, VILLAGE OF
ROSE, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF
ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF
ROYAL OAK, CITY OF
ROY ALTON, TOWNSHIP OF
RUBICON, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUTLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
SAGINAW, CITY OF
SAGINAW, TOWNSHIP OF
SALEM,TOWNSHIP OF
SALINE, CITY OF
SAND BEACH, TOWNSHIP OF
SANILAC, TOWNSHIP OF
SARANAC, VILLAGE OF
SAUGATUCK, CITY OF
SAUGATUCK, TOWNSHIP OF
SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CITY OF
SCIO, TOWNSHIP OF
SEBEWAING, VILLAGE OF
SECORD, TOWNSHIP OF
SELMA, TOWNSHIP OF
SHELBY, TOWNSHIP OF
SHERIDAN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHERMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHERMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHERWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIAWASSEE, TOWNSHIP OF
SHOREHAM, VILLAGE OF
SIMS, TOWNSHIP OF
SKANDIA, TOWNSHIP OF
County
CLARE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
MONTCALM COUNTY
LAPEER COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
ROSCOMMON
COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
IONIA COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
GLAD WIN COUNTY
WEXFORD COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/17/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/24/97
09/30/88(R)
08/13/98
01/13/83(R)
05/19/92(R)
07/30/99
01/05/78(R)
09/16/81(R)
03/18/94
09/16/81(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/14/90(R)
05/06/97
05/25/84(R)
12/16/94(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
02/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
11/16/83(R)
07/02/79(R)
04/01/88(R)
01/18/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/04/88(R)
08/28/89(R)
12/03/87(R)
01/29/97
09/30/88(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/11/83(R)
09/18/87(R)
10/16/91(R)
04/02/98
07/03/86(R)
02/26/82(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/26/97
Current Effective
Map
06/17/86(M)
03/16/81
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/05/78
09/16/81
09/02/94
03/12/82
06/15/79
01/07/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/15/82
(NSFHA)
12/01/77
09/30/88(M)
02/01/86(L)
08/19/86(M)
10/16/97
10/16/97
04/01/88(L)
01/18/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/87
02/01/80
02/01/80
05/04/88
08/03/89
12/03/87
08/03/98
07/16/80
03/11/83(M)
01/07/98
07/03/86(M)
02/26/82(M)
02/03/93
Page 13 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260046#
260378
260761
261021
26021 1#
260212#
260320#
260179#
260242#
260461
26074 1#
260336#
260303#
260281#
260282#
260054#
261017
260905#
260593#
260127#
260279#
260205#
260767
260444#
260726
260044#
260045#
260085#
260016B
2600 17#
260139#
260128#
260573A
260801#
260156#
260575#
260307#
260243#
260380#
260770
260283#
260888#
260080#
26070 1#
260982
260494#
260102#
260728#
260503#
260117#
260709#
260565A
260683
Community Name
SODUS, TOWNSHIP OF
SOO, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH ARM, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH BRANCH, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH HAVEN, CITY OF
SOUTH HAVEN, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH ROCKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
SOUTHFIELD, CITY OF
SOUTHGATE, CITY OF
SPALDING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPARTA, TOWNSHIP OF
SPARTA, VILLAGE OF
SPAULDING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING LAKE, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
SPRINGVALE, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. CHARLES, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. CHARLES, VILLAGE OF
ST. CLAIR SHORES, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. IGNACE, CITY OF
ST. IGNACE, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. JOHNS, CITY OF
ST. JOSEPH, CITY OF
ST. JOSEPH, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. LOUIS, CITY OF
STANDISH, CITY OF
STANDISH, TOWNSHIP OF
STEPHENSON, CITY OF
STERLING HEIGHTS, CITY OF
STOCKBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
STRONACH, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMPTER, TOWNSHIP OF
SUPERIOR, TOWNSHIP OF
SUTTONS BAY, TOWNSHIP OF
SUTTONS BAY, VILLAGE OF
SWAN CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SWARTZ CREEK, CITY OF
SYLVAN LAKE, CITY OF
SYLVAN, TOWNSHIP OF
TALLMADGE, TOWNSHIP OF
TAW AS CITY, CITY OF
TAYLOR, CITY OF
TAYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
TECUMSEH, CITY OF
TEKONSHA, TOWNSHIP OF
TEKONSHA, VILLAGE OF
THETFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
County
BERRIEN COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CHARLEVOIX
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
GRATIOT COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
MANISTEE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
LEELANAU COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
IOSCO COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
LENAWEE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/03/78(R)
01/06/88(R)
03/18/87(R)
05/06/98
03/04/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/02/83(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/28/95
01/03/85(R)
02/16/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
02/15/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/03/00(R)
01/15/98(R)
10/18/83(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/15/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
12/18/86(R)
12/18/86(R)
03/16/88(R)
02/01/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
01/18/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/04/87(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/17/87(R)
05/05/81(R)
09/01/88(R)
04/03/87(R)
06/01/77(R)
10/16/97(R)
11/01/79(R)
11/16/83(R)
12/17/96
03/02/83(R)
02/15/78(R)
ll/25/86(R)
12/16/88(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/04/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
01/06/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/78
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/04/80
05/15/80
04/20/00
09/28/79
09/15/78
01/03/85
02/16/83
10/16/97
02/15/78
06/01/78
09/28/79(M)
(NSFHA)
10/16/97
10/16/97
08/01/79
12/15/78
08/01/78
(NSFHA)
11/20/00
(NSFHA)
02/01/78
06/18/80
01/18/89
09/27/85(M)
04/02/93
05/16/77
05/15/86
09/04/86
09/30/88(M)
04/20/00
10/15/82
12/17/87
05/05/81
09/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
06/01/77
10/16/97
11/01/79
11/16/83
03/02/83
06/02/94
05/06/96
10/16/97
06/01/82
06/04/87(M)
05/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
Page 14 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260603#
260519
260630#
260206#
260504#
260414#
260082#
260244#
260180#
260351
260550#
260527
261016
260805#
260812#
260608#
260370#
260208#
261012
260825#
260524#
260578A
260720#
260665#
260567
260508A
260110#
260129#
260447#
260284#
26029 1#
260047#
260048#
260986
260678
260744#
260245#
260754
260416#
260388#
260182#
260993
26072 1#
260739#
260470A
260479#
260417A
260299#
Community Name
THOMAS, TOWNSHIP OF
THOMPSON, TOWNSHIP OF
NSFHA
THORNAPPLE, TOWNSHIP OF
THREE RIVERS, CITY OF
TITTABAWASEE, TOWNHIP OF
TORCH LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
TRAVERSE CITY, CITY OF
TRENTON, CITY OF
TROY, CITY OF
TURNER, TOWNSHIP OF
TURNER, VILLAGE OF
TUSCOLA, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UTICA, CITY OF
VANDALIA, VILLAGE OF
VASSAR, CITY OF
VASSAR, TOWNSHIP OF
VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF
VERNON, VILLAGE OF
VICKSBURG, VILLAGE OF
VICTOR, TOWNSHIP OF
VIENNA, TOWNSHIP OF
WAKEFIELD, CITY OF
WALES, TOWNSHIP OF
WALKER, CITY OF
WARREN, CITY OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WATERFORD, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
WATERTOWN, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
WATERVLIET, CITY OF
WATERVLIET, TOWNSHIP OF
WAUCEDAH, TOWNSHIP OF
WAVERLY, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYLAND, CITY OF
WAYNE, CITY OF
WEBBER, TOWNSHIP OF
WEBBERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WELLS, TOWNSHIP OF
FIRM date 6/8/98
WEST BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BRANCH, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST TRAVERSE, TOWNSHIP OF
WESTLAND, CITY OF
WHITE CLOUD, CITY OF
WHITE LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITE OAK, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITE RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
County
SAGINAW COUNTY
SCHOOLCRAFT
COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
ANTRIM COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
WAYNE COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
ARENAC COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
BRANCH COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
ISABELLA COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
SHIAWASSEE
COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GOGEBIC COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
MACOMB COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
DICKINSON COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
EMMET COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
NEWAYGO COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/19/83(R)
06/05/96(R)
02/01/86(R)
12/15/90(R)
02/01/87(R)
06/16/92(R)
12/15/82(R)
08/17/81(R)
05/02/83(R)
10/29/98
09/30/88(R)
12/18/86(R)
01/15/98
09/30/88(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
12/14/79(R)
04/01/77(R)
12/22/97
02/05/92(R)
05/17/88(R)
07/02/87(R)
02/02/89(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
05/25/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/01/82(R)
05/01/79(R)
02/12/82(R)
02/02/83(R)
05/17/82(R)
11/16/83(R)
11/16/83(R)
03/11/97
08/29/94
06/05/89(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/18/87(R)
08/10/79(R)
06/08/98(R)
03/02/83(R)
06/11/97
03/01/87(R)
01/22/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/11/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
01/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/16/97
(NSFHA)
02/01/86(L)
12/15/90
10/16/97
01/17/97
12/15/82
06/19/85
09/16/88
07/18/75
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/88(M)
01/07/98
02/18/81
12/14/79(M)
06/19/89
01/07/98
05/17/88
07/02/87(M)
02/02/89
01/02/81
(NSFHA)
07/18/85(M)
06/01/82
05/15/86
06/01/82
02/02/83
05/17/82
11/16/83
11/16/83
06/05/89(M)
08/15/80
(NSFHA)
1 1/02/83(M)
06/08/98
03/02/83
03/01/87(L)
01/17/85
09/01/86(L)
02/01/85
07/16/90(M)
11/04/92
Page 15 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
260321#
260157#
260166#
260794#
260018#
261013
260359#
260094#
260095#
26007 1#
260823#
260209#
260480A
260730#
260296A
260495
260246#
260111#
260432A
260541
260216#
260542#
260983
260932
260285#
260286#
Community Name
WHITEFISH, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITEFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITEHALL, CITY OF
WHITEWATER, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITNEY, TOWNSHIP OF
WILCOX, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIAMSTON, CITY OF
WILLIAMSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
WINDSOR, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF
WISE, TOWNSHIP OF
WISNER, TOWNSHIP OF
WOLVERINE LAKE, VILLAGE OF
WOODHAVEN, CITY OF
WORTH, TOWNSHIP OF
WRIGHT, TOWNSHIP OF
WYANDOTTE, CITY OF
WYOMING, CITY OF
YATES, TOWNSHIP OF
YORK, TOWNSHIP OF
YPSILANTI, CITY OF
YPSILANTI, TOWNSHIP OF
ZEELAND, CITY OF
ZEELAND, TOWNSHIP (CHARTER)
ZILWAUKEE, CITY OF
ZILWAUKEE, TOWNSHIP OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MUSKEGON COUNTY
GRAND TRAVERSE
COUNT
ARENAC COUNTY
NEWAYCO COUNTY
BAY COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
INGHAM COUNTY
EATON COUNTY
ISABELLA COUNTY
TUSCOLA COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SANILAC COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
OTTAWA
OTTAWA COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
SAGINAW COUNTY
766
682
92
147
84
6
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/87(R)
04/01/81(R)
10/15/80(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/01/78(R)
01/15/98
02/01/86(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/01/87(R)
04/24/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/12/97(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/02/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
10/29/98
07/16/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/17/97
05/12/95
07/02/79(R)
07/02/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/04/92
04/20/00
10/15/80
09/30/88(M)
1 1/04/92
06/18/96
04/01/82
04/15/82
01/02/81
01/07/98
05/15/78
05/01/87(L)
02/05/86
06/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/01/78
02/05/92
09/01/86(L)
09/10/82
06/15/81
10/16/97
10/16/97
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 16 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"MICHIGAN
260696# BALDWIN, TOWNSHIP OF
260559B BURLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
260939# CLAM LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
260918# COLD WATER, TOWNSHIP OF
260576# GALESBURG, CITY OF
260948# GARDEN, VILLAGE OF
260928# HARING, TOWNSHIP OF
260806# HENDERICKS, TOWNSHIP OF
260353# L'ANSE, TOWNSHIP OF
260366 LAGRANGE, TOWNSHIP OF
260700# LAKE ANGELUS, VILLAGE OF
260811# LOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
260348 MANLIUS, TOWNSHIP OF
260924# NEW LOTHROP, VILLAGE OF
260369 SILVER CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
260557 STEVENSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
260540# SUPERIOR, TOWNSHIP OF
County
DELTA COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WEXFORD ROAD
ISABELLA COUNTY
KALAMAZOO
COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
WEXFORD COUNTY
MACKINAC COUNTY
BARAGA COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
OAKLAND COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
ALLEGAN COUNTY
SHIAWASEE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BERRIEN COUNTY
WASHTENAW
COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
06/08/98(F)
07/02/87(F)
08/03/98(F)
01/07/98(F)
04/01/82(F)
06/08/98(F)
08/03/98(F)
09/30/88(F)
02/24/78
02/01/86(F)
11/16/83(F)
09/07/98(F)
11/26/76
11/05/97(F)
04/01/88(F)
09/26/75
06/17/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/08/99
07/02/87(8)
08/03/99
01/07/99
10/24/76
06/08/99
08/03/99
09/30/88(8)
02/24/79
10/16/98(W)
11/16/84
09/07/98(8)
11/26/77
11/05/98
05/01/92(W)
09/26/76
06/17/78
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 17 of 17
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270323#
270308#
2703 18#
275226A
270628#
27000 1#
270135#
270267#
270689#
270005#
275227A
270466#
270375#
270268#
270437#
270417A
275228#
270443
270412
270087
270553A
270078#
270040B
270092#
275229A
270244
270407
270639
270710#
270429#
270679
270684
270362#
270467
2700 19#
270474B
270234
270663
270652#
27020 1#
270720
270418
270007#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"MINNESOTA
ADA, CITY OF
ADAMS, CITY OF
ADRIAN, CITY OF
AFTON, CITY OF
AITKIN COUNTY *
AITKIN, CITY OF
ALBERT LEA, CITY OF
ALVARADO, CITY OF
ANDOVER, CITY OF
ANOKA COUNTY *
ANOKA, CITY OF
APPLETON, CITY OF
ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF
ARGYLE, CITY OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AUSTIN, CITY OF
AVON, CITY OF
BADGER, CITY OF
BAGLEY, CITY OF
BALATON, CITY OF
BARNESVILLE, CITY OF
BARNUM, CITY OF
BAXTER, CITY OF
BAYPORT, CITY OF
BEAVER BAY, CITY OF
BEAVER CREEK, CITY OF
BECKER COUNTY *
BECKER, CITY OF
FIRM panels numbered 27141C0220 E, 27141C0240 E,
27141C0310 E, 27141C0330 E, and 27141C0335 E.
BELLE PLAINE, CITY OF
BELLINGHAM, CITY OF
BELTRAMI COUNTY *
BELTRAMI, CITY OF
BENSON, CITY OF
BENTON COUNTY *
BERTHA, CITY OF
BIG FALLS, CITY OF
BIG LAKE, CITY OF
BIG STONE COUNTY *
BIGFORK, CITY OF
BIRCHWOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF
BIWABIK, CITY OF
ELAINE, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
NORMAN COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
NOBLES COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AITKIN COUNTY
AITKIN COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
ROSEAU COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
BECKER COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LAC QUI PARLE
COUNTY
BELTRAMI COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
KOOCHICHING
COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
BIG STONE COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/02/82(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/21/72(R)
03/15/82(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/30/80(R)
01/16/80(R)
11/30/73(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
11/12/99
05/14/71(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/15/91(R)
05/12/72(R)
05/25/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/12/00(R)
12/18/86(R)
03/30/79(R)
05/15/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
05/25/84(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/17/86(R)
06/08/84(R)
12/26/78(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/17/89(R)
06/08/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
11/15/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/18/94
08/15/79
06/01/82
01/02/76
02/02/96
03/15/82
05/03/82
04/03/96
07/18/83
01/16/80
02/27/76
04/01/82
07/02/81
10/18/94
06/17/86(M)
06/25/76
08/18/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
03/02/81
09/04/85(M)
05/15/91
02/13/76
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/04/00
12/18/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/19/83
(NSFHA)
12/04/81
07/17/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/17/86
04/17/89
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/19/81
Page 1 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
275230#
27523 1#
270116#
270333
270240
270093#
275232#
270151#
270152#
270475B
270034#
270480#
270310
270191#
270262#
270535#
270102#
270712#
270198#
270521
270545#
270141#
270039#
270041
270049#
275233A
270631
270685#
270008#
270153#
27005 1#
275234#
270125#
270066#
270682#
270707#
270464
270009#
270067
270476B
270764
275235#
270618
270536#
270560#
270363A
270024
270042#
270202#
Community Name
BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF
BLUE EARTH COUNTY *
BLUE EARTH, CITY OF
BLUFFTON, CITY OF
BO YD, CITY OF
BRAINERD, CITY OF
BRECKENRIDGE, CITY OF
BROOKLYN CENTER, CITY OF
BROOKLYN PARK, CITY OF
BROWERVILLE, CITY OF
BROWN COUNTY *
BROWNS VALLEY, CITY OF
BROWNSDALE, CITY OF
BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF
BROWNTON, CITY OF
BUFFALO, CITY OF
BURNSVILLE, CITY OF
CALEDONIA, CITY OF
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CAMPBELL, CITY OF
CANBY, CITY OF
CANNON FALLS, CITY OF
CARLTON COUNTY *
CARLTON, CITY OF
CARVER COUNTY*
CARVER, CITY OF
CASS COUNTY *
CENTER CITY, CITY OF
CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
CHAMPLIN, CITY OF
CHANHASSEN, CITY OF
CHASKA, CITY OF
CHATFIELD, CITY OF
CHIPPEWA COUNTY *
CHISAGO COUNTY *
CHISAGO, CITY OF
CHOKIO, CITY OF
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
CLARA CITY, CITY OF
CLARISSA, CITY OF
CLARKFIELD, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CLEARWATER COUNTY*
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
CLEVELAND, CITY OF
CLIMAX, CITY OF
CLINTON, CITY OF
CLOQUET, CITY OF
COHASSETT, CITY OF
County
RAMSEY COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
FARIBAULT COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
LAC QUI PARLE
COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
WILKIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
TRAVERSE COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
ISANTI COUNTY
WILKIN COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
GOODHUE COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
CLAY COUNTY
CLEARWATER
COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BIG STONE COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/08/72(R)
1 l/24/72(R)
05/03/82(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/25/84(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/04/70(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/18/85(R)
02/15/84(R)
04/05/94(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/01/77(R)
05/21/01
06/08/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
06/01/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/01/88(R)
06/08/84(R)
02/01/78(R)
09/08/72(R)
05/15/85(R)
01/28/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/18/77(R)
07/02/79(R)
09/08/72(R)
08/02/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/18/83(R)
01/07/83(R)
03/18/97
09/15/78(R)
06/08/84(R)
06/03/86(R)
02/28/97
05/05/72(R)
11/15/85(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/07/79(R)
02/28/97
05/15/97
09/27/9 1(R)
02/28/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/16/81
07/21/99
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
08/15/89
02/17/82
09/30/95
09/30/88(M)
06/06/00
06/17/86
(NSFHA)
02/15/84
08/18/92
05/15/85
09/01/77
10/13/78
04/20/98
(NSFHA)
06/01/83
09/06/96
09/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
01/06/88
03/26/76
(NSFHA)
01/28/83(M)
06/02/99
07/18/77
07/02/79
07/20/98
08/02/82
05/19/87
08/02/93
01/07/83(M)
09/15/78
(NSFHA)
06/03/86(M)
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
11/01/79
07/21/99
06/11/76
09/27/91
Page 2 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270537B
270444#
2700 10#
270035#
270619
270420#
27001 1#
270155#
270502A
270622#
270765#
2703 14#
270043
270364#
270094#
270095B
27009 1#
270156#
270101#
270526#
27024 1#
270157#
270158
270203
270539#
270694
270713B
270564#
270080#
270548#
270225
270623#
270566#
27042 1#
27048 IB
270403#
270103#
270477B
2700 12#
275236#
270159#
270354
270160#
270527#
270769
270484#
270335
270436
Community Name
THE CITY OF COHASSETT HAS ADOPTED THE
ITASCA COUNTY [270200] FIRM DATED 11/1/78.
COKATO, CITY OF
COLD SPRING, CITY OF
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, CITY OF
COMFREY, CITY OF
COOK COUNTY *
COOK, CITY OF
COON RAPIDS,CITY OF
CORCORAN, CITY OF
COTTAGE GROVE, CITY OF
COTTONWOOD COUNTY *
COTTONWOOD, CITY OF
THE CITY OF COTTONWOOD HAS ADOPTED LYON
COUNTY [270256] FHBM DATED 12-2-77.
COURTLAND, CITY OF
CROMWELL, CITY OF
CROOKSTON, CITY OF
CROSBY, CITY OF
CROSSLAKE, CITY OF
CROW WING COUNTY *
CRYSTAL, CITY OF
DAKOTA COUNTY *
DAKOTA, CITY OF
DAWSON, CITY OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DEEPHAVEN, CITY OF
DEER RIVER, CITY OF
DELANO, CITY OF
DELLWOOD, CITY OF
DENNISON, CITY OF
DETROIT LAKES, CITY OF
OIL WORTH, CITY OF
DODGE COUNTY *
DONALDSON, CITY OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DOVER, CITY OF
DULUTH, CITY OF
DUMONT, CITY OF
DUNDAS, CITY OF
EAGAN, CITY OF
EAGLE BEND, CITY OF
EAST BETHEL, CITY OF
EAST GRAND FORKS, CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE, CITY OF
EDGERTON, CITY OF
EDINA, CITY OF
ELBA, CITY OF
ELBOW LAKE, CITY OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELIZABETH, CITY OF
ELK RIVER, CITY OF
County
WRIGHT COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COTTONWOOD
COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
NICOLLET COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
LAC QUI PARLE
COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
BECKER COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
TRAVERSE COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/85(R)
08/01/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/07/97
05/15/85(R)
03/01/77(R)
03/15/77(R)
01/16/81(R)
04/30/76(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
03/21/97(R)
06/05/96
06/01/78(R)
09/01/77(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
07/02/87(R)
05/15/91(R)
06/01/78(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/16/80(R)
02/01/78(R)
12/26/78(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/01/80(R)
12/26/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/15/79(R)
03/26/97
09/01/88(R)
04/15/82(R)
02/01/80(R)
09/04/87(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/11/78(R)
06/03/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
11/15/85(R)
05/01/80(R)
11/01/78(R)
03/26/97
06/17/86(R)
05/25/84(R)
05/02/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/85(M)
10/02/81
09/29/78
06/06/00
(NSFHA)
03/01/77
03/15/77
01/16/81
04/30/76
01/02/81
07/21/99
(NSFHA)
09/01/77
09/02/81
07/02/87(M)
05/15/91
11/19/86
04/01/81
06/15/82
01/16/80
08/18/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/02/88
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
08/19/86
05/19/81
09/24/82
09/01/88(L)
04/15/82
1 1/04/92
09/04/87(M)
04/15/82
08/11/78(M)
06/03/86(M)
05/15/80
07/20/79
01/17/86(M)
(NSFHA)
05/01/80
11/01/78
06/20/00
(NSFHA)
05/04/00
Page 3 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270567
270657#
270161#
270329#
270669#
270404#
270104#
270739#
270081
270337
270096
270124#
270366A
270423#
270020#
270287B
270097#
270134#
270446
270013#
270438
270136
270082#
270257
270263#
270137#
270370
270083#
270737#
270162#
270768
270140#
270528
270026
270089
270204#
270068#
270549#
270215#
270413#
270673#
270164
270269#
270226#
270324#
270674#
270485#
270540#
270408
270678#
270105#
Community Name
ELY, CITY OF
EMMONS,CITY OF
EXCELSIOR, CITY OF
EYOTA, CITY OF
FARIBAULT COUNTY *
FARIBAULT, CITY OF
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FAYAL, TOWNSHIP OF
FELTON, CITY OF
FERGUS FALLS, CITY OF
FIFTY LAKES, CITY OF
FILLMORE COUNTY*
FISHER, CITY OF
FLOODWOOD, CITY OF
FOLEY, CITY OF
FORESTON, CITY OF
FORT RIPLEY, CITY OF
FREEBORN COUNTY *
FREEPORT, CITY OF
FRIDLEY, CITY OF
GAYLORD, CITY OF
GENEVA,CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GHENT, CITY OF
GLENCOE, CITY OF
GLENVILLE, CITY OF
GLENWOOD, CITY OF
GLYNDON, CITY OF
GNESEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF
GOOD THUNDER, CITY OF
GOODHUE COUNTY *
GOOD VIEW, CITY OF
GRACEVILLE, CITY OF
GRAND MARAIS, CITY OF
GRAND RAPIDS, CITY OF
GRANITE FALLS, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY *
GRASSTON, CITY OF
GREENBUSH, CITY OF
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRYGLA, CITY OF
HALLOCK, CITY OF
HALSTAD, CITY OF
HAM LAKE, CITY OF
HAMMOND, CITY OF
HANOVER, CITY OF
HARDWICK, CITY OF
HASSAN, TOWNSHIP OF
HASTINGS,CITY OF
County
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
FARIBAULT COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
BIG STONE COUNTY
COOK COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
GRANT COUNTY
KANABEC COUNTY
ROSEAU COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
NORMAN COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/85(R)
05/03/82(R)
03/20/8 1(R)
12/15/81(R)
05/17/82(R)
11/01/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/21/97(R)
08/10/79(R)
06/08/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
05/03/82(R)
08/19/97
03/02/8 1(R)
06/08/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/08/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/03/82(R)
06/08/84(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
11/12/99(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/26/97
04/17/78(R)
06/15/82(R)
07/25/97
04/15/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
04/01/77(R)
05/01/88(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/30/82(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/26/78(R)
09/30/82(R)
01/02/80(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
11/19/80(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/08/84(R)
03/16/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
05/03/82
03/20/81
12/15/81
05/17/82
11/01/78
03/01/79
02/19/92(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/18/87(M)
09/01/87(L)
07/17/78
09/18/85(M)
09/27/85(M)
02/15/91
05/03/82
03/02/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/18/83
(NSFHA)
08/18/92
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
03/02/81
02/19/92(M)
08/19/86
01/18/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/18/79
06/04/80
05/01/88(L)
06/04/80
09/30/82
08/18/92
(NSFHA)
09/30/82
01/02/80
(NSFHA)
07/16/80
06/20/00
08/03/92
(NSFHA)
06/16/93
12/18/81
Page 4 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270084#
270550#
270440#
270252
270325#
270576
270708#
270478
270577#
270002A
270347B
270192#
270166#
270190#
270193#
270575
270195
270504#
270264#
270167#
270106#
270197#
270199#
270288#
270200#
270253
270632#
270213#
270496
270410A
270430#
2702 14#
270629B
270247#
270581#
270205B
270686#
270472
270121
270284A
270224#
270233#
275237#
270239#
270486#
270630
270030A
Community Name
HAWLEY, CITY OF
HAYFIELD, CITY OF
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HENDRICKS, CITY OF
HENDRUM, CITY OF
HERMAN, CITY OF
HERMANTOWN, CITY OF
HEWITT, CITY OF
HIBBING, CITY OF
HILL CITY, CITY OF
HINCKLEY, CITY OF
HOKAH, CITY OF
HOPKINS, CITY OF
HOUSTON COUNTY *
HOUSTON, CITY OF
HOYT LAKES, CITY OF
HUBBARD COUNTY *
HUGO, CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, CITY OF
ISANTI COUNTY *
ISANTI, CITY OF
ISLE, CITY OF
ITASCA COUNTY *
IVANHOE, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON,CITY OF
JANESVILLE, CITY OF
JASPER, CITY OF
JORDAN, CITY OF
KANABEC COUNTY *
KANDIYOHI COUNTY*
KASOTA, CITY OF
KASSON, CITY OF
KEEWATIN, CITY OF
KENNEDY, CITY OF
KERKHOVEN, CITY OF
KIESTER, CITY OF
KINGSTON, CITY OF
KITTSON COUNTY *
KOOCHICHING COUNTY *
LA CRESCENT, CITY OF
LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY *
LAKE CITY, CITY OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE CRYSTAL, CITY OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
NORMAN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
AITKIN COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
HUBBARD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
ISANTI COUNTY
ISANTI COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WASECA COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
KANABEC COUNTY
KANDIYOHI COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
FARIBAULT COUNTY
MEEKER COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
KOOCHICHING
COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
LAC QUI PARLE
COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/16/81(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/18/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/02/97
11/18/81(R)
06/08/84(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
01/21/00
09/04/87(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/05/81(R)
01/06/82(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
01/06/83(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/17/89(R)
11/01/79(R)
11/01/78(R)
06/22/84(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/22/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/01/78(R)
07/17/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/04/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
06/22/84(R)
03/18/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/01/88(R)
07/20/73(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/16/81
07/06/82
01/06/99
(NSFHA)
07/18/94
11/18/81
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
01/02/76
09/04/87(M)
03/15/82
06/16/92
06/06/01
05/24/74
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/31/82
08/18/92
09/30/92
08/01/80
04/20/98
04/17/89
11/01/79
11/01/78
(NSFHA)
01/02/81
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
01/06/82
11/01/78
07/17/86(M)
07/21/99
01/06/82
09/04/87(M)
08/05/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/03/85(M)
02/04/81
09/29/96
05/02/83
06/04/80
06/20/00
(NSFHA)
07/03/85(M)
Page 5 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270505#
270654#
270062
275240#
270767
275239#
275238#
270107#
27073 8#
270231
270126#
270298#
270376
270246#
270248#
270583#
270265#
270014
275241A
270653B
270683#
270015#
270285#
270377#
270299#
270237
270445
270371
270168
270479#
270659
27041 1#
270584A
270256#
270127#
270517B
270671
270266#
270698
275242#
270585#
270169#
270170
270586#
270378C
270509B
27063 8#
Community Name
LAKE ELMO, CITY OF
LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY *
LAKE SHORE, CITY OF
LAKE ST. CROIX BEACH, CITY OF
LAKE WILSON, CITY OF
LAKELAND SHORES, CITY OF
LAKELAND, CITY OF
LAKEVILLE, CITY OF
LAKEWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LANESBORO, CITY OF
LASTRUP, CITY OF
LAUDERDALE, CITY OF
LE SUEUR COUNTY *
LE SUEUR, CITY OF
LEROY, CITY OF
LESTER PRAIRIE, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LILYDALE, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LINDSTROM, CITY OF
LINO LAKES, CITY OF
LITCHFIELD, CITY OF
LITTLE CANADA, CITY OF
LITTLE FALLS, CITY OF
LITTLEFORK, CITY OF
LONDSDALE, CITY OF
LONG BEACH, CITY OF
LONG LAKE, CITY OF
LONG PRAIRIE, CITY OF
LORETTO, CITY OF
LUVERNE, CITY OF
LYND, CITY OF
LYON COUNTY *
MABEL, CITY OF
MADELIA, CITY OF
MAHNOMEN COUNTY *
MAHNOMEN, CITY OF
MAHTOMEDI, CITY OF
MANKATO, CITY OF
MANTORVILLE, CITY OF
MAPLE GROVE, CITY OF
MAPLE PLAIN, CITY OF
MAPLEVIEW, CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, CITY OF
MARINE-ON-ST. CROIX, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY*
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAKE OF THE
WOODS CO
CASS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
MEEKER COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
KOOCHICHING
COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
WATONWAN
COUNTY
MAHNOMEN COUNTY
MAHNOMEN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/79(R)
09/05/90(R)
06/22/84(R)
02/19/72(R)
03/26/97
04/28/72(R)
02/09/72(R)
05/01/79(R)
05/03/01(R)
06/22/84(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/26/78(R)
10/15/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/04/87(R)
02/12/79(R)
02/09/73(R)
07/03/85(R)
01/07/83(R)
05/17/82(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
11/03/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/18/85(R)
06/23/99
06/22/84(R)
02/20/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/17/82(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/01/98(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
11/16/87
05/15/85(R)
09/02/88(R)
06/22/84(R)
12/22/72(R)
1 0/23/9 1(R)
04/17/78(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/15/84(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/18/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/79
09/05/90
(NSFHA)
04/25/80
06/27/80
04/25/80
04/20/98
02/19/92(M)
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
09/14/90
(NSFHA)
07/21/99
07/21/99
05/15/80
08/18/92
(NSFHA)
11/14/75
07/03/85(M)
01/07/83(M)
05/17/82
02/15/91
11/03/82
05/01/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
05/17/82
08/19/85(M)
06/01/98(L)
03/02/81
09/01/87
(NSFHA)
09/02/88
(NSFHA)
1 1/20/00
02/03/82
04/17/78
(NSFHA)
05/15/84
08/05/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
10/16/87
Page 6 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
27025m
270641
270487#
2706 16#
270773
270462#
270690#
270171#
270280#
270450#
270493B
270110
270109
270270#
27074 1#
270111
270289#
270624#
270172#
270259#
270529#
270174
270173#
270175B
275243A
270541#
275244#
270045B
2702 16#
270465
2706 17#
270399#
270300#
270176#
270379#
270307#
270473
270645#
270770
270380#
270177#
270220
270249#
270036#
270271
270510#
270625#
270099
270668#
270322#
270072#
275245#
270382#
Community Name
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MARTIN COUNTY *
MAZEPPA, CITY OF
MC LEOD COUNTY *
MCGREGOR, CITY OF
MEDFORD, CITY OF
MEDICINE LAKE, CITY OF
MEDINA, CITY OF
MEEKER COUNTY *
MELROSE, CITY OF
MENAHGA, CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MENDOTA, CITY OF
MIDDLE RIVER, CITY OF
MIDWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
MIESVILLE, CITY OF
MILACA, CITY OF
MILLE LACS COUNTY *
MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF
MINNEOTA, CITY OF
MINNESOTA CITY, CITY OF
MINNETONKA BEACH, CITY OF
MINNETONKA, CITY OF
MINNETRISTA, CITY OF
MONTEVIDEO, CITY OF
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MOORHEAD, CITY OF
MOOSE LAKE, CITY OF
MORA, CITY OF
MORRIS, CITY OF
MORRISON COUNTY *
MORTON, CITY OF
MOTLEY, CITY OF
MOUND, CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW, CITY OF
MOWER COUNTY *
MURDOCK, CITY OF
MURRAY COUNTY *
NEW AUBURN, CITY OF
NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF
NEW HOPE, CITY OF
NEW LONDON, CITY OF
NEW PRAGUE, CITY OF
NEW ULM, CITY OF
NEWFOLDEN, CITY OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NICOLLET COUNTY *
NISSWA, CITY OF
NOBLES COUNTY*
NORMAN COUNTY*
NORTH BRANCH, CITY OF
NORTH MANKATO, CITY OF
NORTH ST. PAUL, CITY OF
County
LYON COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
AITKIN COUNTY
STEELE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
MEEKER COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
KANABEC COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
KANDIYOHI COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NICOLLET COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
NOBLES COUNTY
NORMAN COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
NICOLLET COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
09/01/88(R)
02/12/90(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/12/97
09/02/8 1(R)
04/15/82(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/01/88(R)
05/19/81(R)
03/28/97
06/22/84(R)
04/15/85(R)
02/01/84(R)
03/21/97(R)
12/21/78(R)
05/05/81(R)
09/27/85(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/30/74
07/19/82(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/26/72(R)
11/01/79(R)
02/18/72(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/01/77(R)
05/15/97
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/18/86(R)
06/19/89(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/02/83(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/03/90(R)
03/26/97
09/01/78(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
11/15/85(R)
11/01/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
06/22/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
10/16/84(R)
06/22/84(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/19/97(R)
04/28/72(R)
09/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/21/79
09/01/88(L)
06/20/00
08/18/92
09/02/81
04/15/82
09/03/80
09/01/88(L)
05/19/81
01/30/76
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/01/84
02/19/92(M)
(NSFHA)
05/05/81
09/27/85(M)
02/18/81
04/06/00
07/19/82
(NSFHA)
09/30/92
09/27/85(M)
08/29/75
11/01/79
05/04/87
09/18/85(M)
09/01/77
06/15/81
12/18/86
06/19/89(M)
09/29/78
03/02/83
07/16/79
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
09/01/78
01/02/81
(NSFHA)
07/21/99
06/06/00
(NSFHA)
07/02/80
07/21/99
(NSFHA)
06/03/86(M)
07/18/94
05/19/97
07/21/99
09/15/78
Page 7 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270406#
270593
270511
270027
2702 17B
270400
270626#
270290B
270178#
270330#
270028#
270272#
270658
270747#
270339
270675
270463#
270004#
270196
270452#
270340
27065 1#
270326#
270128#
270301
270348#
270704#
270145#
270627#
270359#
270390
270179#
270503#
270368B
270547A
270129#
270292#
270432#
270425#
27068 1#
270302#
270112#
27023 8#
270222C
270387B
270391
270146#
270644#
270393
270634#
270646#
Community Name
NORTHFIELD, CITY OF
NORWOOD, CITY OF
OAKDALE, CITY OF
ODESSA, CITY OF
OGILVIE, CITY OF
OLIVIA, CITY OF
OLMSTED COUNTY *
ONAMIA, CITY OF
ORONO, CITY OF
ORONOCO, CITY OF
ORTONVILLE, CITY OF
OSLO, CITY OF
OSSEO, CITY OF
OTSEGO, CITY OF
OTTER TAIL COUNTY *
OTTERTAIL, CITY OF
OWATONNA, CITY OF
PALISADE, CITY OF
PARK RAPIDS, CITY OF
PAYNESVILLE, CITY OF
PELICAN RAPIDS, CITY OF
PENNINGTON COUNTY *
PERLEY, CITY OF
PETERSON, CITY OF
PIERZ, CITY OF
PINE CITY, CITY OF
PINE COUNTY *
PINE ISLAND, CITY OF
PIPESTONE COUNTY*
PIPESTONE, CITY OF
PLUMMER, CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY *
POPE COUNTY*
PORTER, CITY OF
PRESTON, CITY OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PRIOR LAKE, CITY OF
PROCTOR, CITY OF
RAMSEY, CITY OF
RANDALL, CITY OF
RANDOLPH, CITY OF
RANIER, CITY OF
RAYMOND, CITY OF
RED LAKE COUNTY*
RED LAKE FALL, CITY OF
RED WING, CITY OF
REDWOOD COUNTY *
REDWOOD FALLS, CITY OF
RENVILLE COUNTY*
RICE COUNTY *
County
RICE COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BIG STONE COUNTY
KANABEC COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
BIG STONE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
STEELE COUNTY
AITKIN COUNTY
HUBBARD COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
NORMAN COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
RED LAKE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
FILLMORE COUNTY
MILLE LACS COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
KOOCHICHING
COUNTY
KANDIYOHI COUNTY
RED LAKE COUNTY
RED LAKE COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/02/8 1(R)
05/13/83(R)
12/26/78(R)
01/03/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
10/17/78(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
02/19/86(R)
09/16/82(R)
12/21/78(R)
09/30/92(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/22/84(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
03/08/84(R)
06/22/84(R)
08/16/94(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/03/90(R)
06/15/79(R)
05/05/81(R)
01/03/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
04/07/92(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/03/86(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
08/15/83(R)
08/19/87(R)
03/20/74
08/01/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/02/87(R)
01/03/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/04/85(R)
06/22/84(R)
03/16/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/04/98
09/18/85(M)
09/01/83
04/17/95
02/19/86
09/16/82
(NSFHA)
09/30/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/04/81
03/01/84
(NSFHA)
08/16/94
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
07/18/94
05/05/81
(NSFHA)
12/01/81
11/20/91
02/16/94
07/03/86(M)
02/15/91
(NSFHA)
02/19/82
08/15/83
08/19/87(M)
07/09/76
08/01/79
06/15/81
11/19/97
05/04/89
11/01/79
03/02/81
07/16/80
09/27/91
05/17/88(M)
07/02/87(M)
(NSFHA)
01/06/99
12/04/85
(NSFHA)
03/16/88
08/04/88
Page 8 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270742#
270180
270100#
270181#
275246#
270642
270349
270182#
270454#
270530#
270598#
270633#
270414#
270113#
270599
270303#
270131#
270687#
270600
270771
270394B
27035 1#
270460#
270459#
270023#
270433#
270428#
270494#
270434#
270327#
270435#
270384#
270185#
270620#
270603
270304#
270114#
270016
270186#
270132#
27003 8#
270716
270183
27053 1#
270033
270456#
2700 17#
Community Name
RICE LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
COMMUNITY HAS ADOPTED ST. LOUIS COUNTY
FIRM DATED 2/19/92C
RICHFIELD, CITY OF
RIVERTON, CITY OF
ROBBINSDALE, CITY OF
ROCHESTER, CITY OF
ROCK COUNTY *
ROCK CREEK, CITY OF
ROCKFORD, CITY OF
ROCKVILLE, CITY OF
ROLLINGSTONE, CITY OF
ROSE CREEK, CITY OF
ROSEAU COUNTY *
ROSEAU, CITY OF
ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF
ROY ALTON, CITY OF
RUSHFORD VILLAGE, CITY OF
RUSHFORD, CITY OF
RUSSELL, CITY OF
SABIN, CITY OF
SANBORN, CITY OF
SANDSTONE, CITY OF
SARTELL, CITY OF
SAUK CENTRE, CITY OF
SAUK RAPIDS, CITY OF
SAVAGE, CITY OF
SCOTT COUNTY*
SEBEKA, CITY OF
SHAKOPEE, CITY OF
SHELLY, CITY OF
SHERBURNE COUNTY *
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
SHOREWOOD, CITY OF
SIBLEY COUNTY *
SILVER BAY, CITY OF
SOBIESKI, CITY OF
SOUTH ST. PAUL, CITY OF
SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY OF
SPRING PARK, CITY OF
SPRING VALLEY, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. ANTHONY, CITY OF
ST. BONIFACIUS, CITY OF
ST. CHARLES, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR, CITY OF
ST. CLOUD, CITY OF
ST. FRANCIS, CITY OF
County
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
ROSEAU COUNTY
ROSEAU COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
NORMAN COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/14/97(R)
08/24/81(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
08/01/77(R)
03/26/7 1(R)
07/01/88(R)
07/06/84(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/16/79(R)
01/02/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
03/28/80(R)
05/24/93(R)
05/23/80(R)
07/06/84(R)
03/28/97
07/03/85(R)
01/06/83(R)
02/15/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/14/77(R)
06/18/80(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/21/97(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/01/81(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/06/88(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/24/81(R)
05/01/79(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
07/02/79(R)
02/26/98
12/26/78(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/30/98(R)
04/01/77(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/19/92(M)
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
08/01/77
02/04/98
07/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
08/18/92
07/16/79
07/19/82
07/16/79
12/04/81
10/30/81
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
03/28/80
09/04/87(M)
05/23/80(M)
(NSFHA)
07/03/85(M)
01/06/83
01/07/83
11/19/81
12/20/99
05/16/94
02/19/87
05/04/89
09/29/78
07/18/94
05/04/00
04/01/81
07/02/82
01/06/99
(NSFHA)
07/16/80
06/18/80
(NSFHA)
05/01/79
09/02/81
06/06/00
(NSFHA)
04/15/82
(NSFHA)
11/16/94
03/02/81
Page 9 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270343#
2705 18#
270416#
270184#
275247B
270543#
270514#
275248#
2703 17#
270232#
270074
270372
270546#
270635#
270273#
270640A
270332#
275249#
270532#
270636#
270075
270344#
270482#
27055 1#
270187#
270766
27062 1#
270139#
270245
270255
270306
270385#
270115#
270054
270426
270483#
270490#
270055#
270637#
270495#
27046 1#
2703 11#
270147#
270274#
27041 5#
270647B
270499#
270056#
Community Name
ST. HILAIRE, CITY OF
ST. JAMES, CITY OF
ST. LOUIS COUNTY *
ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF
ST. MARYS POINT, CITY OF
ST. MICHAEL, CITY OF
ST. PAUL PARK, CITY OF
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
ST. PETER, CITY OF
ST. VINCENT, CITY OF
STACY, CITY OF
STARBUCK, CITY OF
STEARNS COUNTY*
STEELE COUNTY *
STEPHEN, CITY OF
STEVENS COUNTY*
STEWARTVILLE, CITY OF
STILL WATER, CITY OF
STOCKTON, CITY OF
SWIFT COUNTY *
TAYLORS FALLS, CITY OF
THIEF RIVER FALLS, CITY OF
TINTAH, CITY OF
TODD COUNTY *
TONKA BAY, CITY OF
TRACY, CITY OF
TRAVERSE COUNTY*
TWIN LAKES, CITY OF
TWO HARBORS, CITY OF
TYLER, CITY OF
UPSALA, CITY OF
VADNAIS HEIGHTS, CITY OF
VERMILLION, CITY OF
VICTORIA, CITY OF
VIRGINIA, CITY OF
WABASHA COUNTY *
WABASHA, CITY OF
WACONIA, CITY OF
WADENA COUNTY*
WADENA, CITY OF
WAITE PARK, CITY OF
WALTHAM, CITY OF
WANAMINGO, CITY OF
WARREN, CITY OF
WARROAD, CITY OF
WASECA COUNTY *
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WATERTOWN, CITY OF
County
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
WATONWAN
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
NICOLLET COUNTY
KITTSON COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
POPE COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
STEELE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
OLMSTED COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
TRAVERSE COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
LYONS COUNTY
TRAVERSE COUNTY
FREEBORN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
MOWER COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LAKE OF THE
WOODS CO
ROSEAU COUNTY
WASECA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/06/84(R)
05/03/82(R)
02/19/92(R)
06/01/77(R)
02/25/72(R)
11/01/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/09/73(R)
04/17/78(R)
09/02/82(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/06/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/16/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/02/82(R)
03/16/73(R)
08/02/82(R)
04/30/86(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/01/88(R)
05/01/79(R)
03/21/97
08/19/87(R)
05/03/82(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/13/83(R)
10/28/97
06/30/76(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/06/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/05/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
05/17/89(R)
10/16/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/17/82(R)
11/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/03/90
05/03/82
02/19/92
06/17/86
09/26/75
07/02/82
06/18/80
07/02/91
07/21/99
09/02/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/16/94
11/04/81
09/16/82
09/01/87(L)
04/17/95
02/01/84
08/02/82
04/30/86
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
08/19/86
09/01/88(L)
05/01/79
08/19/87(M)
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/25/74
11/13/81(M)
11/01/79
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/20/00
06/20/00
01/05/78
07/03/86(M)
07/17/86(M)
05/17/89
10/16/79
06/15/81
11/19/87
12/04/79
08/19/85(M)
05/17/82
08/18/92
Page 10 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
27025 1#
270649A
270772
270188#
270123
270729
270133#
270611
270386B
270688#
270519#
270353A
270090#
270525#
275250#
2706 14A
270441
270699
270189#
27032 1#
270534#
270752#
270544#
270656
270756
27049 1#
270148#
Community Name
WATERVILLE, CITY OF
WATONWAN COUNTY *
WAUBUN, CITY OF
WAYZATA, CITY OF
WELLS, CITY OF
WEST ST. PAUL, CITY OF
WHALAN, CITY OF
WHEATON, CITY OF
WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY OF
WHITE BEAR,TOWNSHIP OF
WILKIN COUNTY *
WILLOW RIVER, CITY OF
WINDOM, CITY OF
WINONA COUNTY *
WINONA, CITY OF
WINSTED, CITY OF
WINTHROP, CITY OF
WOODBURY, CITY OF
WOODLAND, CITY OF
WORTHINGTON, CITY OF
WRIGHT COUNTY *
WYOMING, TOWNSHIP OF
USE THE CHISAGO COUNTY [270682] FIRM
YELLOW MEDICINE COUNTY *
YOUNG AMERICA, CITY OF
ZIMMERMAN, CITY OF
ZUMBRO FALLS, CITY OF
ZUMBROTA, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
LE SUEUR COUNTY
WATONWAN
COUNTY
MOHNOMEN COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
FARIBAULT COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
TRAVERSE COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
WILKIN COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
COTTONWOOD
COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
SIBLEY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HENNEPIN COUNTY
NOBLES COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
CARVER COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
511
481
101
68
30
10
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/8 1(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/25/97
11/01/79(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/04/88(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
03/18/85(R)
09/04/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/14/79(R)
01/18/84(R)
04/21/72(R)
06/19/89(R)
03/11/97
05/08/01
08/01/79(R)
06/15/84(R)
05/01/78(R)
01/28/94(R)
11/01/78(R)
12/26/78(R)
05/09/00(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/03/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/21/99
07/03/85(M)
06/11/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/02/81
(NSFHA)
09/04/87(M)
09/18/85(M)
09/29/78
07/01/87(L)
06/05/89
01/18/84
08/19/97
06/19/89(M)
07/02/82
06/15/84
08/18/92
11/15/78
(NSFHA)
06/20/00
09/03/80
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 11 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
270492#
27069 1#
270735#
270552
270554#
270057A
270557
270419A
270294A
270740#
270281
2703 12A
270664
270561#
270562
270470A
270563
27073 1#
270760#
270276A
270693#
270570
270571
270732#
270736#
270573
27007 1#
270471 A
270357B
270235#
270579
270580
270098A
270655#
270523
270 143 A
270692B
270667
270243A
270053A
270587
270588
270367A
270589#
270488#
Community Name
"MINNESOTA
ALDRICH, CITY OF
ARCO, CITY OF
ARNA, TOWNSHIP OF
AVOCA, CITY OF
BAUDETTE, CITY OF
BOY RIVER, CITY OF
BROOK PARK, CITY OF
BROOKSTON, CITY OF
BUCKMAN, CITY OF
CANOSIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CEDAR MILLS, CITY OF
CHANDLER, CITY OF
CLEAR LAKE, CITY OF
COBDEN, CITY OF
COLOGNE, CITY OF
DEGRAFF, CITY OF
DELHI, CITY OF
DULUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
ELYSIAN, CITY OF
FAIRMONT, CITY OF
FOREST LAKE, CITY OF
FRAZEE, CITY OF
FUNKLEY, CITY OF
GRAND LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
HADLEY, CITY OF
HARRIS, CITY OF
HOLLOW AY, CITY OF
IHLEN, CITY OF
INTERNATIONAL FALLS, CITY OF
IONA, CITY OF
IRON JUNCTION, CITY OF
JENKINS, CITY OF
KELLOGG, CITY OF
KENT, CITY OF
KENYON, CITY OF
LAKE BENTON, CITY OF
MAPLE LAKE, CITY OF
MARIETTA, CITY OF
MAYER, CITY OF
MAYNARD, CITY OF
MCINTOSH, CITY OF
MENTOR, CITY OF
MILAN, CITY OF
MILLVILLE, CITY OF
County
WADENA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
LAKE OF THE
WOODS CO
CASS COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MORRISON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MEEKER COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
RED LAKE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LE SUEUR COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BECKER COUNTY
BELTRAMI COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
SWIFT COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
KOOCHICHING
COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CROW WING COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
WILKIN COUNTY
GOODHUE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
LAC QUI PARLE
COUNTY
CARVER COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
WABASHA COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
02/07/75
04/15/77
1 1/20/9 1(F)
01/10/75
09/05/90(F)
06/10/77
10/25/74
05/01/87(F)
08/09/74
02/19/92(F)
02/14/75
08/09/74
05/04/00(F)
06/06/00(F)
11/01/74
08/09/74
10/25/74
02/19/92(F)
07/21/99(F)
06/07/74
12/16/77
11/15/74
07/11/75
02/19/92(F)
02/19/92(F)
04/11/75
09/20/74
09/06/74
08/02/74
07/16/96(F)
12/20/74
10/25/74
08/23/74
06/20/00(F)
08/01/75
07/16/76(F)
04/01/77
01/10/75
09/06/74
11/23/73
11/15/74
1 1/29/74
12/20/74
11/01/74
06/20/00(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
02/07/76
04/15/78
1 1/20/92
01/10/76
12/27/75
06/10/78
10/25/75
05/01/87(W)
08/09/75
12/20/75
02/14/76
08/09/75
01/03/76
11/01/75
11/01/75
08/09/75
10/25/75
12/20/75
07/21/00
06/07/75
12/16/78
11/15/75
07/11/76
12/20/75
12/20/75
04/11/76
09/20/75
09/06/75
08/02/75
06/07/75
12/20/75
10/25/75
08/23/75
01/31/76
08/01/76
05/24/75
04/01/78
01/10/76
09/06/75
11/23/74
11/15/75
1 1/29/75
12/20/75
11/01/75
08/02/75
Page 12 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270489#
270122A
270405#
270424#
270451
270590
270591
270592
270512#
270594
270595
270648
270063A
270697A
270596
27021 8 A
270223A
270065
270565A
270597
270453B
270341
270021
270455A
270073A
270360A
270350A
270046A
270602
270662
270672
270601
270457
27045 8 A
270717#
270352
270209
270260A
270047A
270605A
270361 A
270606
270607
270608
270609
27071 8A
270210A
270286A
270666
270279A
Community Name
MINNEISKA, CITY OF
MINNESOTA LAKE, CITY OF
MORRISTOWN, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN IRON, CITY OF
NEW MUNICH, CITY OF
NIELSVILLE, CITY OF
NIMROD, CITY OF
NORCROSS, CITY OF
OAK PARK HEIGHTS, CITY OF
ODIN, CITY OF
OKABENA, CITY OF
ORR, CITY OF
PILLAGER, CITY OF
PINE SPRINGS, CITY OF
PLATO, CITY OF
QUAMBA, CITY OF
REGAL, CITY OF
REMER, CITY OF
REVERE, CITY OF
RICE, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RICHVILLE, CITY OF
RONNEBY, CITY OF
ROSCOE, CITY OF
RUSH CITY, CITY OF
RUTHTON, CITY OF
RUTLEDGE, CITY OF
SCANLON, CITY OF
SEAFORTH, CITY OF
SILVER LAKE, CITY OF
SKYLINE, CITY OF
ST. ANTHONY, CITY OF
ST. JOSEPH, CITY OF
ST. STEPHEN, CITY OF
STAPLES, CITY OF
STURGEON LAKE, CITY OF
TACONITE, CITY OF
TAUNTON, CITY OF
THOMSON, CITY OF
TOWER, CITY OF
TROSKY, CITY OF
TURTLE RIVER, CITY OF
VERNDALE, CITY OF
VERNON CENTER, CITY OF
VESTA, CITY OF
WALNUT GROVE, CITY OF
WARBA, CITY OF
WATKINS, CITY OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WELCOME, CITY OF
County
WABASHA COUNTY
WINONA COUNTY
FARIBAULT COUNTY
RICE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WATONWAN
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
KANABEC COUNTY
KANDIYOHI COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
CHISAGO COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
MCLEOD COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
STEARNS COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
CARLTON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
PIPESTONE COUNTY
BELTRAMI COUNTY
WADENA COUNTY
BLUE EARTH
COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
REDWOOD COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
MEEKER COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
06/20/00(F)
05/17/74
11/18/81(F)
11/26/76
10/25/74
11/01/74
04/18/75
12/13/74
04/01/82(F)
12/13/74
12/27/74
12/13/74
07/19/74
07/22/77
11/01/74
08/09/74
01/31/75
07/11/75
04/11/75
01/17/75
03/29/74
10/25/74
07/11/75
08/02/74
05/10/74
08/09/74
08/09/74
11/02/73
12/13/74
01/24/75
06/27/75
07/11/75
08/27/76
08/23/74
11/10/78
10/25/74
07/23/76
07/19/74
08/02/74
12/13/74
08/09/74
08/01/75
10/25/74
01/03/75
01/10/75
09/29/78
09/13/74
04/12/74
01/17/75
05/10/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/11/76
05/17/75
03/29/75
11/26/77
10/25/75
11/01/75
04/18/76
12/13/75
03/22/75
12/13/75
12/27/75
12/13/75
07/19/75
07/22/78
11/01/75
08/09/75
01/31/76
07/11/76
04/11/76
01/17/76
03/29/75
10/25/75
07/11/76
08/02/75
05/10/75
08/09/75
08/09/75
11/02/74
12/13/75
01/24/76
06/27/76
07/11/76
08/27/77
08/23/75
11/10/79
10/25/75
07/23/77
07/19/75
08/02/75
12/13/75
08/09/75
08/01/76
10/25/75
01/03/76
01/10/76
09/29/79
09/13/75
04/12/75
01/17/76
05/10/75
Page 13 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
270612
270703#
270719#
270734#
270613
270427A
270524A
270615
270048A
270211
Community Name
WILLIAMS, CITY OF
WILLMAR,CITY OF
WILTON, CITY OF
WINDEMERE, TOWNSHIP OF
WINGER, CITY OF
WINTON, CITY OF
WOLVERTON, CITY OF
WOOD LAKE, CITY OF
WRIGHT, CITY OF
ZEMPLE, CITY OF
County
LAKE OF THE
WOODS CO
KANDIYOHI COUNTY
BELTRAMI COUNTY
PINE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
WILKIN COUNTY
YELLOW MEDICINE
COUN
CARLTON COUNTY
ITASCA COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
1 1/29/74
07/29/77
11/10/78
1 1/20/9 1(F)
01/31/75
08/02/74
08/09/74
01/17/75
09/13/74
06/27/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
1 1/29/75
07/29/78
11/10/79
11/20/92
01/31/76
08/02/75
08/09/75
01/17/76
09/13/75
06/27/76
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 1
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 102
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 102
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 14 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
"MISSISSIPPI
280 1 1 5# ABERDEEN, CITY OF
280032A ACKERMAN, TOWN OF
280209# ADAMS COUNTY *
280267# ALCORN COUNTY *
2800 12B ALLIGATOR, TOWN OF
280268# AMITE COUNTY*
280 1 1 6# AMORY, CITY OF
280153B ANGULLA, TOWN OF
280 178B ARCOLA, TOWN OF
280301 ATT ALA COUNTY *
280 134# BALDWYN, CITY OF
280126# BATES VILLE, CITY OF
280087A BAY SPRINGS, TOWN OF
28525 1# BAY ST. LOUIS, CITY OF
280203# BEAUMONT, TOWN OF
280287 BELMONT, TOWN OF
280080# BELZONI, CITY OF
280013B BENOIT, TOWN OF
2800 14A BEULAH, TOWN OF
285252# BILOXI, CITY OF
280 172B BLUE MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
2800 1 1 # BOLIVAR COUNTY *
2802 16# BOLTON, TOWN OF
280135A BOONEVILLE, CITY OF
280015A BOYLE, TOWN OF
280143# BRANDON, CITY OF
280 107# BROOKHAVEN, CITY OF
280026# BRUCE, CITY OF
280264# BURNSVILLE, CITY OF
280 1 1 2B BYHALIA,TOWN OF
280027# CALHOUN CITY,CITY OF
280288# CALHOUN COUNTY *
280109# CANTON, CITY OF
280191# CARROLL COUNTY *
280097B CARTHAGE, CITY OF
280154C CARY, TOWN OF
280169C CHARLESTON, CITY OF
280240A CHUNKY, TOWN OF
28020 1 # CLAIBORNE COUNTY *
280220# CLARKE COUNTY *
280039# CLARKSDALE, CITY OF
280036# CLAY COUNTY *
2800 16# CLEVELAND, CITY OF
28007 1# CLINTON, CITY OF
28003 8# COAHOMA COUNTY *
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
MONROE COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ALCORN COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
AMITE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SHARKEY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ATT ALA COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
TISHOMINGO
COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
TIPPAH COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
PRENTISS COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
TISHOMINGO
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
LEAKE COUNTY
SHARKEY COUNTY
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/01/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/29/89(R)
02/27/92(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/01/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/15/89(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/11/70(R)
08/16/88(R)
04/15/98
01/19/83(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/25/76(R)
09/11/70(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/89(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/17/80(R)
07/18/77(R)
06/18/87(R)
01/17/91(R)
06/18/87(R)
06/18/87(R)
01/03/90(R)
11/15/79(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
08/04/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/01/78(R)
08/16/88(R)
03/04/80(R)
07/16/90(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/17/81(R)
02/01/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/16/88
07/03/86(M)
09/29/89
01/17/91
09/04/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
03/16/88
07/03/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
06/01/88(L)
10/20/99
09/15/89
06/17/86(M)
11/16/83
08/16/88
07/09/76
01/05/89
09/27/85(M)
06/25/76(M)
03/15/84
07/03/86(M)
07/17/89
04/03/78
07/03/86(M)
03/01/87(L)
09/18/86
01/07/00
01/03/90
01/17/91
06/18/87(M)
01/03/90
01/03/90
02/04/98
07/03/78
08/19/85(M)
04/15/86(M)
08/04/87(M)
08/01/86(L)
05/01/78
08/16/88
03/04/80
07/16/90
07/17/89
08/17/81
04/17/95
Page Iof9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
280186B
280265B
280047A
280111#
280108#
280221#
280002#
280291#
280127#
280003
280128B
280313B
280044B
280336#
280157#
280217#
280050#
280162A
280163#
280118B
280017A
280074B
280330
280091#
280314#
280183B
280138B
280399#
280144#
280289#
280148A
280052#
280040B
280081#
280332#
280223#
280045#
280210B
280004B
280075B
280271C
280179#
280102#
280060#
280061#
285253#
280018A
285254#
285255#
Community Name
COFFEEVILLE, TOWN OF
COLD WATER, TOWN OF
COLLINS, CITY OF
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COPIAH COUNTY *
CORINTH, CITY OF
COVINGTON COUNTY *
CRENSHAW, TOWN OF
CROSBY, TOWN OF
CROWDER, CITY OF
CRUGER, TOWN OF
CRYSTAL SPRINGS, CITY OF
D'IBERVILLE, CITY OF
USE THE HARRISON COUNTY [285255] FIRM.
D'LO, TOWN OF
DERMA, TOWN OF
DESOTO COUNTY *
DODDSVILLE, TOWN OF
DREW, CITY OF
DUCK HILL, TOWN OF
DUNCAN, TOWN OF
DURANT, CITY OF
EDWARDS, TOWN OF
ELLISVILLE, CITY OF
ENTERPRISE, TOWN OF
EUPORA, TOWN OF
FALCON, TOWN OF
FLORA, TOWN OF
FLORENCE, TOWN OF
FLOWOOD, TOWN OF
FOREST, CITY OF
FORREST COUNTY *
FRIAR'S POINT, TOWN OF
FULTON, CITY OF
GAUTIER, CITY OF
GEORGE COUNTY *
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GLENDORA, CITY OF
GLOSTER, TOWN OF
GOODMAN, TOWN OF
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRENADA COUNTY*
GRENADA, CITY OF
GULFPORT, CITY OF
GUNNISON, TOWN OF
HANCOCK COUNTY*
HARRISON COUNTY *
County
YALOBUSHA
COUNTY
TATE COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LOWDNES COUNTY
COPIAH COUNTY
ALCORN COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
COPIAH COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
DESOTO COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
FORREST COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
ITAWAMBA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GEORGE COUNTY
COPIAH COUNTY
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
AMITE COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
GRENADA COUNTY
GRENADA COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/13/76(R)
08/04/88(R)
03/16/81(R)
12/15/90(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
11/14/88(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/03/90(R)
07/17/86(R)
05/01/78(R)
04/02/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/31/82(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/01/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/31/95(R)
08/15/80(R)
12/15/82(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/02/90(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/13/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/18/80(R)
12/01/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/11/70(R)
06/25/76(R)
09/09/70(R)
06/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/05/85(M)
09/28/81
09/07/98
08/04/88
03/16/81
12/15/90
09/28/79
02/01/86(L)
08/01/86(L)
04/02/86(M)
03/18/86(M)
12/16/80
01/03/90
08/23/00
07/17/86(M)
05/01/78
04/02/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
12/16/88
09/30/88
06/17/86(M)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/15/80
07/05/94
02/01/87(L)
04/02/90
08/19/87(M)
02/03/93
08/18/92
08/16/88
08/04/88
09/27/85(M)
06/17/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
05/02/94
08/01/79
06/25/82
12/01/78
02/01/84
07/04/88
06/25/76(M)
08/18/92
08/18/92
Page 2 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
280053#
280046
280088A
280292#
280010A
280070#
280180#
280113B
28021 1#
28005 1#
280030B
280192#
280164#
280165#
280190#
280200#
280290#
280103#
280266#
285256#
280072#
280214#
280222#
280041#
280007#
280149B
280304#
280139C
280224#
280092#
280272#
280293#
280057#
280227#
280101#
280181#
280076#
280005B
285257#
280208#
280185#
280193#
280056C
280042B
280043A
Community Name
HATTIESBURG, CITY OF
HAZELHURST, CITY OF
HEIDELBERG, TOWN OF
HERNANDO, CITY OF
HICKORY FLAT, TOWN OF
HINDS COUNTY*
HOLLANDALE, CITY OF
HOLLY SPRINGS, CITY OF
HOLMES COUNTY *
HORN LAKE, CITY OF
HOUSTON, CITY OF
HUMPHREYS COUNTY *
INDIANOLA, CITY OF
INVERNESS, TOWN OF
ISOLA, TOWN OF
ISSAQUENA COUNTY *
ITAWAMBA COUNTY *
ITTA BENA, CITY OF
IUKA, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY*
JACKSON, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JONES COUNTY *
JONESTOWN, TOWN OF
KOSCIUSKO, CITY OF
LAKE, TOWN OF
LAMAR COUNTY *
LAMBERT, TOWN OF
LAUDERDALE COUNTY *
LAUREL, CITY OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LEAKE COUNTY *
LEAKESVILLE, TOWN OF
LEE COUNTY *
LEFLORE COUNTY *
LELAND, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LIBERTY, TOWN OF
LONG BEACH, CITY OF
LOUISE, TOWN OF
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LOWNDES COUNTY *
LUCEDALE, CITY OF
LULA, TOWN OF
LYON, TOWN OF
County
FORREST COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
COPIAH COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
ISSAQUENA COUNTY
ITAWAMBA COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
TISHOMINGO
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
ATT ALA COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LEAKE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
AMITE COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
WINSTON COUNTY
LOWDNES COUNTY
GEORGE COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
COAHOMA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/03/70(R)
01/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/02/79(R)
01/14/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/15/89(R)
05/03/90(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
01/03/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/03/78(R)
02/01/90(R)
03/12/96(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/19/89(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/01/80(R)
07/03/90(R)
02/16/90(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/02/79(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/02/90(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/15/89(R)
09/15/89(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/05/90(R)
11/01/79(R)
02/15/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/11/70(R)
05/01/79(R)
06/15/78(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/15/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
06/25/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/91
01/01/86(L)
01/01/87(L)
06/19/97
08/05/85(M)
09/03/92
01/14/83(M)
08/05/85(M)
09/22/99
06/19/97
09/04/85(M)
01/05/89
01/03/79
01/15/82
07/03/78
02/01/90(L)
09/04/91
04/03/78
06/19/89
04/16/93
06/16/99
07/03/90
02/16/90
09/28/79
07/02/79
08/05/85(M)
07/02/91
09/04/85(M)
03/21/00
05/18/98
09/15/89
09/15/89
09/30/88
10/20/99
03/25/83
02/15/79
05/02/99
09/29/86(M)
05/04/88
05/01/79
06/15/78
09/07/98
04/15/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
06/25/76(M)
Page 3 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
280123A
280228#
280229#
280158#
280297#
280082C
280230#
280095#
280140C
280274#
280184A
280329#
280132#
280058#
280159#
280096#
280019C
280160#
280275#
280212#
280225A
280166#
280104#
280150B
285258#
280020B
280048#
280295B
280001#
280276#
280174B
280131#
280317#
28023 1#
280121#
280028#
280305#
285259#
28003 IB
280277#
280286#
280094#
280021A
280219B
280125#
285260#
285261#
280129#
280338#
Community Name
MACON, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, CITY OF
MAGEE, CITY OF
MAGNOLIA, CITY OF
MANTACHIE, TOWN OF
MARION COUNTY *
MARION, TOWN OF
MARKS, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY*
MATHISTON, TOWN OF
MAYERSVILLE, TOWN OF
MCCOMB, CITY OF
MCLAIN, TOWN OF
MENDENHALL, CITY OF
MERIDIAN, CITY OF
MERIGOLD, TOWN OF
MIZE, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY*
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MONTICELLO, TOWN OF
MOORHEAD, CITY OF
MORGAN CITY, TOWN OF
MORTON, CITY OF
MOSS POINT, CITY OF
MOUND BAYOU, CITY OF
MT. OLIVE, TOWN OF
MYRTLE, TOWN OF
NATCHEZ, CITY OF
NESHOBA COUNTY *
NEW ALBANY, TOWN OF
NEW AUGUSTA, CITY OF
NEWHEBRON, TOWN OF
NEWTON COUNTY *
NEWTON, CITY OF
NORTH CARROLLTON, TOWN OF
NOXUBEE COUNTY *
OCEAN SPRINGS, CITY OF
OKOLONA, CITY OF
OKTIBBEHA COUNTY *
OLIVE BRANCH, TOWN OF
OXFORD, CITY OF
PACE, TOWN OF
PACHUTA, TOWN OF
PANOLA COUNTY *
PASCAGOULA, CITY OF
PASS CHRISTIAN, CITY OF
PEARL RIVER COUNTY *
PEARL RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT
County
NOXUBEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
ITAWAMBA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
IS SAQUENA COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
NESHOBA COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
NOXUBEE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
OKTIBBEHA COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
PEARL RIVER
COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
LEAKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/01/86(R)
01/02/80(R)
12/16/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/17/91(R)
09/29/86(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
12/01/83(R)
09/30/80(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/01/86(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/18/70(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/15/89(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/15/89(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/02/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/02/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/18/70(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/02/86(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/18/70(R)
05/26/70(R)
05/17/90(R)
03/05/93(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/01/86(L)
02/04/98
04/15/94
08/15/80
07/01/87(L)
09/18/85(M)
09/28/79
03/21/00
09/04/85(M)
01/17/91
09/29/86(M)
03/01/87(L)
08/01/79
12/01/83
09/30/80
03/21/00
09/27/85(M)
12/03/93
03/16/88
09/01/87(L)
04/02/86(M)
04/17/78
04/03/78
09/29/86(M)
09/04/87
09/27/85(M)
09/15/89
08/05/85(M)
09/29/89
09/15/89
09/04/85(M)
07/02/91
08/05/85
01/02/80
04/15/80
04/03/78
07/01/87(L)
08/18/92
09/04/85(M)
06/19/89
08/23/00
09/29/78
09/27/85(M)
04/02/86(M)
06/04/80
03/15/84
08/19/87
03/03/92
01/19/96
Page 4 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
280145#
280146#
280233#
280260#
280120#
280130#
280077B
280278#
280218#
280099#
280234#
280348
280033#
280114B
280090#
280147C
2803 18#
280207#
280319#
280142#
280320B
280299#
280321#
280110#
280173#
280155C
280022B
280055B
280167#
280261#
280205#
280105C
280280A
280151A
280171#
280152#
280023B
280024A
280296#
280034#
280106#
280281#
280141C
280306#
280325#
28033 1#
280124#
280059A
280300#
280035#
Community Name
PEARL, CITY OF
PELAHATCHIE, TOWN OF
PERRY COUNTY*
PETAL, CITY OF
PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF
PICAYUNE, CITY OF
PICKENS, TOWN OF
PIKE COUNTY *
PITTSBORO, TOWN OF
PLANTERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PONTOTOC COUNTY*
PONTOTOC, CITY OF
PORT GIBSON, TOWN OF
POTTS CAMP, TOWN OF
PRENTISS, CITY OF
PUCKETT, TOWNSHIP OF
PURVIS, TOWN OF
QUITMAN COUNTY *
QUITMAN, CITY OF
RANKIN COUNTY *
RAYMOND, TOWN OF
RICHLAND, CITY OF
RICHTON, TOWN OF
RIDGELAND, CITY OF
RIPLEY,CITY OF
ROLLING FORK, CITY OF
ROSEDALE,CITY OF
ROXIE, TOWN OF
RULEVILLE, TOWN OF
SALTILLO, TOWN OF
SATARTIA, TOWN OF
SCHLATER, TOWN OF
SCOTT COUNTY*
SEBASTOPOL, VILLAGE OF
SENATOBIA, CITY OF
SHARKEY COUNTY*
SHAW, CITY OF
SHELBY, CITY OF
SHERMAN, TOWN OF
SHUBUTA, TOWN OF
SIDON, TOWN OF
SIMPSON COUNTY *
SLEDGE, TOWN OF
SMITH COUNTY *
SMITHVILLE, TOWN OF
SOUTHHAVEN, CITY OF
STARKVILLE, CITY OF
STATE LINE, TOWN OF
STONE COUNTY*
STONEWALL, TOWN OF
County
MADISON COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
FORREST COUNTY
NESHOBA COUNTY
PEARL RIVER
COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
JEFFERSON DAVIS
CO.
RANKIN COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
RANKIN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
TIPPAH COUNTY
SHARKEY COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
YAZOO COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
TATE COUNTY
SHARKEY COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
BOLIVAR COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
LEFLORE COUNTY
SIMPSON COUNTY
QUITMAN COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
DE SOTO COUNTY
OKTIBBEHA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/15/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
03/04/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/15/89(R)
08/05/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/14/00
06/15/78(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/01/86(R)
12/01/90(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/01/86(R)
12/15/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
02/02/83(R)
04/15/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/04/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/18/87(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/01/91(R)
03/15/78(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/01/91(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/16/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/17/97
01/02/81
07/02/91
04/02/90
10/18/95
03/03/92
08/05/85
09/15/89
01/03/90
10/20/99
02/01/87(L)
06/15/78
08/05/85(M)
01/01/86(L)
12/01/90(L)
07/02/91
09/04/85(M)
01/01/86(L)
06/16/93
08/01/86(L)
03/15/94
04/15/86(M)
04/15/94
06/04/87(M)
09/29/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
06/17/86(M)
05/01/78
10/20/99
11/01/79
09/27/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
06/03/86(M)
09/29/78
07/17/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
07/19/00
03/15/78
09/30/80
09/04/85(M)
12/03/93
03/16/88
08/23/00
06/04/90
08/19/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
08/16/88
Page 5 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
280194C
280326#
280195#
280168#
280206#
280235#
280161#
280078B
280073#
280283#
280236#
280196#
280100#
280197A
280175#
280122#
280029#
280327#
280262#
280176#
280307#
280198#
280177#
280187B
285262#
280238#
280182#
280213B
280284#
280037#
280079B
280202#
280119#
280308#
280189#
280199#
Community Name
SUMNER, TOWN OF
SUMRALL, TOWN OF
SUNFLOWER COUNTY *
SUNFLOWER, TOWN OF
TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY *
TATE COUNTY *
TAYLORSVILLE, TOWN OF
TCHULA, TOWN OF
TERRY, TOWN OF
TISHOMINGO COUNTY
TUNICA COUNTY *
TUNICA, TOWN OF
TUPELO, CITY OF
TUTWILER, TOWN OF
TYLERTOWN, TOWN OF
UNION, TOWN OF
VAIDEN, TOWN OF
VARDAMAN, TOWN OF
VERONA,TOWN OF
VICKSBURG, CITY OF
WALTHALL COUNTY*
WARREN COUNTY*
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WATER VALLEY, CITY OF
WAVELAND, CITY OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WAYNESBORO, CITY OF
WEBB, TOWN OF
WEBSTER COUNTY *
WEST POINT, CITY OF
WEST, TOWN OF
WILKINSON COUNTY *
WINONA, CITY OF
WINSTON COUNTY *
YAZOO CITY, CITY OF
YAZOO COUNTY *
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
SUNFLOWER
COUNTY
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
TATE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
TISHOMINGO
COUNTY
TUNICA COUNTY
TUNICA COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
WALTHALL COUNTY
NESHOBA COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WALTHALL COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YALOBUSHA
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
TALLAHATCHIE
COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
WILKINSON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WINSTON COUNTY
YAZOO COUNTY
YAZOO COUNTY
274
272
2
99
2
1
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/15/90(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/15/93(R)
07/03/90(R)
01/05/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/15/80(R)
03/15/78(R)
11/11/94(R)
06/04/87(R)
09/29/89(R)
08/01/86(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/11/70(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/85(M)
07/02/91
09/28/79
07/17/78
12/15/90
09/27/85(M)
12/03/93
06/17/86(M)
11/04/92
03/15/93
07/03/90
04/18/80
10/20/99
09/01/86(L)
01/16/92
04/15/80
03/15/78
01/03/90
10/20/99
09/29/89
08/01/86(L)
04/17/87
09/03/80
09/27/85(M)
11/16/83
08/16/88
08/16/88
08/01/86(L)
09/18/85(M)
07/16/90
08/05/85(M)
07/16/90
07/02/87(M)
08/19/85(M)
04/15/80
09/28/79
Page 6 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 9 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
280309#
280089
280156B
280054A
280269#
280133C
280188
280270#
280117#
280345#
280302#
280303#
280093#
280315A
280204
280273#
280316#
280337#
280008
280344#
280342#
280279#
280340#
280322A
280334#
280049
280343#
280323#
280226
280341#
280282#
280263A
280237A
280098A
280328#
280239#
Community Name
**MISSISSIPPI
ABBEVILLE, TOWN OF
BASSFIELD, TOWN OF
BRAXTON, VILLAGE OF
BUDE, TOWN OF
CHICKASAW COUNTY
ECRU, TOWN OF
EDEN, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GATTMAN, VILLAGE OF
GUNTOWN, TOWN OF
JASPER COUNTY *
JEFFERSON DAVIS COUNTY *
LAFAYETTE COUNTY *
LEARNED, TOWN OF
LENA, TOWN OF
LINCOLN COUNTY
LOUIN, TOWN OF
LUMBERTON, CITY OF
MCCOOL, VILLAGE OF
NETTLETON, TOWN OF
POLKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PRENTISS COUNTY
RALEIGH, CITY OF
RIENZI, TOWN OF
SCOOBA, TOWN OF
SEMINARY, VILLAGE OF
SHANNON, TOWN OF
SILVER CITY, TOWN OF
SILVER CREEK, TOWN OF
SYLV ARENA, VILLAGE OF
TIPPAH COUNTY
TOCCOPOLA, TOWN OF
UNION COUNTY*
WALNUT GROVE, TOWN OF
WALNUT, TOWN OF
YALOBUSHA COUNTY*
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
JEFFERSON DAVIS
CO.
SIMPSON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHICKASAW COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
YAZOO COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
JEFFERSON DAVIS
CO.
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
HINDS COUNTY
NESHOBA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
ATT ALA COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
PRENTISS COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
ALCORN COUNTY
KEMPER COUNTY
COVINGTON COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
TIPPAH COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LEAKE COUNTY
TIPPAH COUNTY
YALOBUSHA
COUNTY
0
3
0
27
27
Hazard Area
Identified
09/29/78
07/30/76
07/19/74
09/01/86(F)
06/03/77
09/04/86(F)
07/19/74
1 1/04/77
07/19/74
10/20/99(F)
02/24/78
03/31/78
01/17/91(F)
11/10/78
10/25/74
03/1 8/9 1(F)
10/27/78
03/24/89(F)
01/31/75
10/20/99(F)
12/03/93(F)
09/16/77
12/03/93(F)
11/17/78
09/05/90(F)
08/01/75
10/20/99(F)
09/14/79
07/11/75
12/03/93(F)
08/26/77
12/13/74
04/08/77(F)
06/28/74
01/12/79
09/16/88(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/29/79
07/30/77
07/19/75
09/01/86(8)
06/03/78
09/04/86(8)
07/19/75
1 1/04/78
07/19/75
10/20/00
02/24/79
03/31/79
12/27/75
11/10/79
10/25/75
02/17/79
10/27/79
03/24/90
01/31/76
10/20/00
12/03/94
09/16/78
12/03/94
11/17/79
09/05/91
08/01/76
10/20/00
09/14/80
07/11/76
12/03/94
08/26/78
12/13/75
12/13/75
06/28/75
01/12/80
09/16/88(8)
Page 8 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 9 of 9 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290749A
290420#
29004 1#
290761
290145B
290080#
290905#
290490B
290005A
2902 17B
290004#
290287#
290763B
290229#
290123#
290168B
290930
290491 A
290764
290188#
29075 1#
290752
290009#
29046 1#
290121#
290087B
290880#
290328#
290768A
290785#
290786#
290332#
290333#
29042 IB
290329#
290330#
290062#
290027#
290852
290132#
290335#
290422
290230#
290154#
290886#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"MISSOURI
ADRIAN, CITY OF
ADVANCE, CITY OF
AGENCY, TOWN OF
AIRPORT DRIVE, VILLAGE OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF
ALLENVILLE, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF ALLENVILLE HAS ADOPTED THE
CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY (290790) FIRM DATED
4-15-88 PANEL 0125.
ALTON, CITY OF
AMAZONIA, CITY OF
ANDERSON, CITY OF
ANDREW COUNTY*
ANNADA, VILLAGE OF
ANNAPOLIS, CITY OF
ANNISTON, CITY OF
ARBYRD, CITY OF
ARCADIA, CITY OF
ARCOLA, VILLAGE OF
ARGYLE, VILLAGE
ARMSTRONG, CITY OF
ARNOLD, CITY OF
ASH GROVE, CITY OF
ASHLAND, CITY OF
ATCHISON COUNTY
AUGUSTA, VILLAGE OF
AVA, CITY OF
AVONDALE,CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK, VILLAGE OF
BALLWIN, CITY OF
BARNARD, CITY OF
BARTON COUNTY*
BATES COUNTY *
BEL-NOR, VILLAGE OF
BEL-RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
BELL CITY, CITY OF
BELLA VILLA, CITY OF
BELLEFONTAINE NEIGHBORS, CITY OF
BELTON, CITY OF
BENTON COUNTY*
BENTON, CITY OF
BERGER, CITY OF
BERKELEY, CITY OF
BERNIE, CITY OF
BERTRAND, CITY OF
BETHANY, CITY OF
BIG LAKE, VILLAGE OF
in the National Flood Program
County
BATES COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
GENTRY COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
COUNT
OREGON COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
NODAWAY COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/85(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/09/99
08/19/85(R)
05/02/77(R)
04/17/98(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/30/99
08/05/85(R)
07/04/88(R)
11/19/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/04/85(R)
06/03/88(R)
07/17/89(R)
12/19/00
08/01/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
01/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/01/90(R)
01/31/01(R)
08/04/88(R)
10/26/76(R)
08/05/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/01/01(R)
08/26/77(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/16/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/15/82(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/06/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/85(M)
06/15/78
05/01/80
02/14/75
08/19/85(M)
06/16/99
08/04/87(M)
02/06/76
08/05/85(M)
07/04/88
11/19/86
08/01/86(L)
01/18/89
06/03/88
07/17/89(M)
08/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
10/16/96
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
03/01/90(L)
12/06/99
08/04/88
10/26/76
08/05/85(M)
08/23/00
09/04/85(M)
07/01/87(L)
03/01/01(L)
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
08/19/85(M)
08/23/00
08/23/00
05/04/87
03/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
06/15/82
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
01/18/89
04/01/82
01/06/88
Page 1 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290158#
290417#
295272
290336#
290109B
290139
290771 A
290423B
290169#
290006A
290299#
290787#
290321B
290034#
290110#
290113
290288#
290274#
290436#
290337#
290338#
290339#
2902 14#
290619A
290074#
290040#
290170#
290916#
290740#
290044#
290026B
290891#
290439#
290620
290622A
290238
290049#
290789#
290104
290248#
290204#
290790#
290458#
290125#
290179#
290057#
290058#
290060#
Community Name
BIGELOW, VILLAGE OF
BIRCH TREE, CITY OF
BIRMINGHAM, VILLAGE OF
BLACK JACK, CITY OF
BLACKWATER, CITY OF
BLAND, CITY OF
BLODGETT, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMFIELD, CITY OF
BLUE SPRINGS, CITY OF
BOLCKOW, TOWN OF
BOLIVAR, CITY OF
BOLLINGER COUNTY *
BONNE TERRE, CITY OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BOONVILLE, CITY OF
BOURBON, CITY OF
BOWLING GREEN, CITY OF
BRAGG CITY, CITY OF
BRANSON, CITY OF
BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, CITY OF
BRENTWOOD, CITY OF
BRIDGETON, CITY OF
BROOKFIELD, CITY OF
BROWNING, CITY OF
BRUNSWICK, CITY OF
BUCHANAN COUNTY
BUCKNER, CITY OF
BULL CREEK, VILLAGE OF
USE THE TANEY COUNTY [290435] FIRM
BURLINGTON JUNCTION, CITY OF
BUTLER COUNTY
BUTLER, CITY OF
BYRNES MILL, CITY OF
CABOOL,CITY OF
CAINSVILLE, CITY OF
CALHOUN, CITY OF
CALIFORNIA, CITY OF
CALLAWAY COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY *
CAMERON, CITY OF
CANALOU, TOWN OF
CANTON, CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY*
CAPE GIRARDEAU, CITY OF
CARD WELL, CITY OF
CARL JUNCTION, CITY OF
CARROLL COUNTY*
CARROLLTON, TOWN OF
CARTER COUNTY*
County
HOLT COUNTY
SHANNON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
COOPER COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BOLLINGER COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
COOPER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
TANEY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
TANEY COUNTY
NODAWAY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TEXAS COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MONITEAU COUNTY
CALLAWAY COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
CO.
CAPE GIRARDEAU
CO.
DUNKLIN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 l/23/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/01/79(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
12/07/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/15/78(R)
05/17/89(R)
06/15/88(R)
08/15/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
10/16/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
05/02/77(R)
04/02/98(R)
10/26/76(R)
10/15/80(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/01/78(R)
07/16/90(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/02/83(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/15/78(R)
09/30/97(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/03/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/21/87
08/01/78(R)
10/10/97(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/24/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
05/01/94(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/01/77(R)
04/15/88(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/01/82(R)
10/17/86(R)
12/18/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/06/88
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
12/07/84(M)
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
08/05/86(M)
07/18/83
05/17/89(M)
12/15/89
08/15/90
08/19/85(M)
06/15/83
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
05/02/77
06/01/78
10/18/95
08/23/00
08/23/00
08/23/00
07/16/90
09/18/85(M)
02/02/83
08/01/83
09/15/78
01/19/00
04/01/82
02/19/97
09/04/85(M)
03/19/90
08/01/78
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
01/03/85
05/01/94(L)
(NSFHA)
07/16/81
02/01/77
08/15/89
1 1/05/80
03/01/79
06/01/82
10/17/86
12/18/84
02/04/87
Page 2 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290180#
290181#
290275#
290783#
29031 1A
290035B
290409B
290270#
290073#
29023 1#
290896#
290216#
290847#
290792#
290340#
290289#
290126#
290086#
290089#
290341#
290600
290793#
290155#
290601 A
290107#
290036#
290410#
290745
290342#
290794#
290603
290159#
290898#
290746#
290604
290160#
290430#
290795#
290063
290343#
290344#
290189#
290345#
290464
290899#
295263#
290504#
290346#
290453A
290347#
290748
290424#
Community Name
CARTERVILLE, CITY OF
CARTHAGE, CITY OF
CARUTHERSVILLE, CITY OF
CASS COUNTY *
CENTER VILLE, VILLAGE OF
CENTRALIA, CITY OF
CHAFFEE, CITY OF
CHAMOIS, CITY OF
CHARITON COUNTY*
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHESTERFIELD, CITY OF
CHILLICOTHE, CITY OF
CHRISTIAN COUNTY *
CLARK COUNTY *
CLARKSON VALLEY, CITY OF
CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF
CLARKTON, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CLAYCOMO, VILLAGE OF
CLAYTON, CITY OF
CLEVER, CITY OF
CLINTON COUNTY*
CLINTON, CITY OF
COBALT VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
COLE COUNTY
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
COMMERCE, CITY OF
CONCORDIA, CITY OF
COOL VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
COOPER COUNTY *
COOTER, TOWN OF
CORNING, TOWN OF
COTTLEVILLE, CITY OF
USE THE ST. CHARLES COUNTY [290315] FIRM
COUNTRY CLUB HILLS, CITY OF
COUNTRY CLUB, VILLAGE OF
CRAIG, CITY OF
CRANE, CITY OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY*
CREIGHTON, CITY OF
CRESTWOOD, CITY OF
CREVE COEUR, CITY OF
CRYSTAL CITY,CITY OF
CRYSTAL LAKE PARK, CITY OF
DALTON, VILLAGE OF
DARDENNE PRAIRIE, TOWN OF
DE SOTO, CITY OF
DEARBORN, CITY OF
DELLWOOD, CITY OF
DENVER, VILLAGE OF
DBS PERES, CITY OF
DESLOGE, CITY OF
DEXTER, CITY OF
County
JASPER COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
REYNOLDS COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
COLE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
COOPER COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/84(R)
06/15/83(R)
01/16/81(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
11/15/84(R)
12/03/87(R)
01/04/85(R)
09/15/78(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/30/99
02/01/97(R)
04/08/77(R)
04/01/77(R)
01/29/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/01/77(R)
02/14/76(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
06/18/87(R)
07/04/88(R)
07/02/87(R)
01/21/82(R)
08/27/71(R)
06/01/78(R)
02/09/79(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/01/89(R)
06/30/76(R)
01/06/88(R)
02/01/90(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/24/84(R)
01/06/88(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/30/80(R)
05/02/77(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/01/77(R)
08/01/86(R)
12/02/94
03/13/95(R)
05/26/72(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/27/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/84
06/15/83
01/16/81
05/04/92
08/01/86(L)
04/15/77(M)
09/27/85(M)
03/18/87
12/03/87
01/18/89
08/23/00
08/05/85
04/19/83
01/19/00
08/23/00
04/01/77
04/17/95
02/17/89
12/02/80(L)
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
06/18/87(M)
07/04/88
07/02/87(M)
12/15/81
08/16/95
09/02/88
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
09/02/89(L)
(NSFHA)
01/06/88
12/06/99
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/06/88
07/16/80
05/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
08/23/00
12/28/82
(NSFHA)
12/02/94
12/06/99
06/15/81
06/15/79
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
06/01/82
Page 3 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290925
290313#
290727
290064B
290615
290122#
290927#
290065#
290232#
290851
29029 1#
290195B
290072B
290227#
290312#
290348#
290466B
290209#
29041 8#
290587A
290425
290349#
290589A
290090#
290590
290010B
290292#
290323#
290163#
290350#
29035 1#
290191#
290045#
290883#
290457#
290352#
290210#
290780
290161#
290902#
290887#
290493#
290482#
Community Name
DIEHLSTADT, VILLAGE OF
DONIPHAN, CITY OF
DOOLITTLE, CITY OF
DREXEL, CITY OF
DUDLEY, CITY OF
DUNKLIN COUNTY *
DUTCHTOWN, VILLAGE OF
USE THE CAPE GIRARDEAUCOUNTY(290790) FIRM
DATED 8-15-89 PANEL 125B.
EAST LYNNE, CITY OF
EAST PRAIRIE, CITY OF
EDGAR SPRINGS, CITY OF
EDGERTON, CITY OF
EDINA, CITY OF
EL DORADO SPRINGS, CITY OF
ELDON,TOWN OF
ELLINGTON, CITY OF
ELLISVILLE, CITY OF
ELLSINORE, CITY OF
ELSBERRY, CITY OF
EMINENCE, CITY OF
EMMA, CITY OF
ESSEX, CITY OF
EUREKA, CITY OF
EVERTON, CITY OF
EXCELSIOR SPRINGS, CITY OF
EXETER, CITY OF
FAIRFAX, CITY OF
FARLEY, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF FARLEY HAS ADOPTED THE
PLATTE COUNTY (290475) FIRM DATED 6-4-87 PANEL
0100.
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FAYETTE, CITY OF
FENTON, CITY OF
FERGUSON, CITY OF
FESTUS,CITY OF
FISK, CITY OF
FLINTHILL, VILLAGE OF
FLORDELL HILLS, CITY OF
FLORISSANT, CITY OF
FOLEY, CITY OF
FORDLAND, CITY OF
FOREST CITY, CITY OF
FORISTELL, CITY OF
FORTESCUE, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
County
SCOTT COUNTY
RIPLEY COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
COUNT
CASS COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
REYNOLDS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
SHANNON COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/96
09/15/89(R)
08/24/84(R)
04/08/77(R)
04/10/97
04/03/89(R)
12/30/98(R)
03/25/80(R)
09/25/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/18/87(R)
04/15/86(R)
12/12/78(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/09/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/18/77(R)
03/25/77(R)
08/04/83(R)
07/05/77(R)
08/01/86(R)
03/15/77(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/30/97(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/19/83(R)
01/19/78(R)
01/19/78(R)
02/14/76(R)
09/16/81(R)
11/19/86(R)
06/10/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
08/24/84(R)
01/06/88(R)
02/24/93(R)
01/06/88(R)
10/16/84(R)
03/02/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/15/89
(NSFHA)
04/08/77(M)
(NSFHA)
04/03/89
03/25/80(M)
01/18/89
(NSFHA)
06/04/80
06/18/87(M)
04/15/86(M)
06/18/87
01/16/81
08/23/00
08/19/86(M)
1 1/04/88
07/18/77
03/25/77(M)
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
08/01/86(L)
03/15/77
(NSFHA)
07/18/85(M)
01/24/75
01/16/81
01/19/83
08/23/00
08/23/00
01/02/81
04/02/91
12/06/99
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
03/01/78
(NSFHA)
01/06/88
12/06/99
01/06/88
10/16/84
07/20/98
Page 4 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
29022 1#
290066#
290353#
29005 1#
290273B
290431 A
290151B
290067B
290801#
290140#
290250#
29009 1#
290164#
290885#
290092B
290354#
290105B
290737#
290263#
290904#
290171#
290738
290355#
290668#
290782#
290450A
29071 1#
290150#
290356#
290223#
290307#
290068#
290037#
290454#
290277#
290276#
290598
290357#
290308#
290192#
290141B
290713
290358#
290127
290714A
Community Name
FREDERICKTOWN, CITY OF
FREEMAN, CITY OF
FRONTENAC, CITY OF
FULTON, CITY OF
GAINESVILLE, CITY OF
GALENA, CITY OF
GALT, CITY OF
GARDEN CITY, CITY OF
GASCONADE COUNTY*
GASCONADE, CITY OF
GIDEON, CITY OF
GLADSTONE, CITY OF
GLASGOW, CITY OF
GLEN ALLEN, CITY OF
GLENAIRE, CITY OF
GLENDALE, CITY OF
GOWER, CITY OF
GRAIN VALLEY, CITY OF
GRANBY, CITY OF
GRAND FALLS PLAZA, TOWN OF
USE THE NEWTON COUNTY [290820] FIRM
GRANDVIEW, CITY OF
GRANT CITY, CITY OF
GRANTWOOD VILLAGE, TOWN OF
GREEN PARK, CITY OF
THE CITY OF GREEN PARK HAS ADOPTED THE ST.
LOUIS COUNTY( 290327) FIRM
DATED 8-2-95 PANELS 312 AND 315.
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRUNDY COUNTY
HANLEY HILLS, VILLAGE OF
HANNIBAL, CITY OF
HARDIN, CITY OF
HARRISONVILLE, CITY OF
HARTSBURG, VILLAGE OF
HARTVILLE, CITY OF
HAYTI HEIGHTS, CITY OF
HAYTI, CITY OF
HAYWOOD CITY, CITY OF
HAZELWOOD, CITY OF
HENRIETTA, CITY OF
HERCULANEUM, CITY OF
HERMANN, CITY OF
HIGGINSVILLE, CITY OF
HILLSDALE, VILLAGE OF
HOLCOMB, CITY OF
HOLDEN, CITY OF
County
MADISON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CALLAWAY COUNTY
OZARK COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
BOLLINGER COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
RALLS COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/03/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/15/83(R)
08/19/86(R)
03/22/94
07/18/85(R)
04/08/77(R)
09/04/87(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/15/78(R)
01/05/78(R)
08/02/82(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/15/77(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
10/09/79(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/26/93(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/12/98(R)
06/15/83(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/03/79(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/16/82(R)
03/04/85(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
02/11/76(R)
04/01/80(R)
08/16/82(R)
05/15/78(R)
03/05/76(R)
08/04/83(R)
08/24/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/01/01(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/06/81
05/01/80
08/23/00
05/15/86
08/19/86(M)
10/31/75
07/18/85(M)
04/08/77(M)
09/04/87
12/18/84
04/02/93
08/05/86
08/02/82
08/15/90
09/15/77
(NSFHA)
07/18/85(M)
08/15/79
07/03/85
05/04/87
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
01/17/97
08/01/86(L)
01/03/79
02/01/87(L)
08/23/00
03/01/82
01/06/83
11/01/79
08/16/82
03/04/85
10/16/96
06/03/88
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
08/16/82
11/17/93
04/23/76
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/01/01(L)
Page 5 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290574#
290437#
290157#
290093#
290278#
290489#
290128B
290440#
290162#
290251
290359#
290718
290172#
290897
290446B
290720#
290492#
295265#
290581
290807#
290108#
290808#
290360#
290809#
290183#
Community Name
HOLLAND, CITY OF
HOLLISTER, CITY OF
HOLT COUNTY*
HOLT, CITY OF
HOMESTOWN, CITY OF
HOPKINS, CITY OF
HORNERSVILLE, CITY OF
HOUSTON, CITY OF
HOWARD COUNTY*
HOWARDVILLE, CITY OF
HUNTLEIGH, TOWN OF
HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE,CITY OF
IRON MOUNTAIN LAKE, CITY OF
IRONDALE, TOWN OF
IRONTON, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON, CITY OF
JAMESTOWN, CITY OF
JASPER COUNTY*
JEFFERSON CITY, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF CEDAR CITY
INCLUDES THE CITY OF CEDAR CITY
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JENNINGS, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY *
JOPLIN, CITY OF
County
PEMISCOT COUNTY
TANEY COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
NODAWAY COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
TEXAS COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
CO.
MONITEAU COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
CALLAWAY COUNTY
COLE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/78(R)
03/18/85(R)
01/06/88(R)
04/17/80(R)
04/17/79(R)
04/01/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/18/77(R)
01/05/89(R)
07/10/79(R)
12/30/98(R)
08/24/84(R)
02/01/79(R)
10/13/88
12/23/88
12/04/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/04/73(R)
08/24/84(R)
05/15/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/16/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
10/26/90(R)
12/08/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/78
01/19/00
01/06/88
03/04/80
04/17/79(M)
04/01/82
09/29/86(M)
07/18/77
08/16/96
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
03/21/00
05/13/77
12/04/84
1 1/03/89
01/03/86
(NSFHA)
04/17/85
10/06/81
04/03/95
08/23/00
04/02/90(M)
07/18/83
NEWTON COUNTY
INCLUDES THE CONSOLIDATED VILLAGE OF IRON
GATES (JASPER COUNTY); CITY OF SUNNYVALE
(NEWTON COUNTY); AND THE VILLAGE OF MIDWAY
(NEWTON COUNTY).
INCLUDES THE CONSOLIDATED VILLAGE OF IRON
GATES (JASPER COUNTY); CITY OF SUNNYVALE
(NEWTON COUNTY); AND THE VILLAGE OF MIDWAY
(NEWTON COUNTY).
290081
290173#
290095#
290129#
290723#
290432
290193#
290002#
290362#
290724
290701
29081 1#
KAHOKA, CITY OF
KANSAS CITY, CITY OF
KEARNEY, CITY OF
KENNETT, CITY OF
KEYTESVILLE, CITY OF
KIMBERLING, CITY OF
KIMMSWICK, CITY OF
KIRKSVILLE, CITY OF
KIRKWOOD, CITY OF
KNOB NOSTER, CITY OF
LA MONTE, CITY OF
LACLEDE COUNTY *
CLARK COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
AD AIR COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
PETTIS COUNTY
LACLEDE COUNTY
08/24/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/17/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/04/88(R)
04/15/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/03/87(R)
08/07/95
08/24/84(R)
02/24/93(R)
(NSFHA)
09/14/90
07/17/78
06/04/80
07/04/88
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
02/04/81
08/23/00
06/27/75
(NSFHA)
04/17/85
Page 6 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290017
290363#
290812#
290205B
290697#
290868#
290700#
290877#
290364#
290025#
290704B
290705#
290706A
290561
290197#
290174#
290175#
29048 1#
290844#
290707
290096#
29044 1#
290252#
290869#
290053B
290563
290814#
290682
290290#
290239#
290365#
290054B
290220#
290684
290130#
290366#
290455#
295266#
290032#
290215B
290816#
290222#
290200B
290368#
290565A
290403#
290685
290253#
290444#
290889#
290264B
Community Name
LADDONIA, CITY OF
LADUE,CITY OF
LAFAYETTE COUNTY *
LAGRANGE,CITY OF
LAKE LOTAWANA, CITY OF
LAKE ST. LOUIS, CITY OF
LAKE WAUKOMIS, CITY OF
LAKE WINNEBAGO, CITY OF
LAKESHIRE, CITY OF
LAMAR, CITY OF
LATHROP, CITY OF
LAWSON, CITY OF
LEADWOOD, CITY OF
LEASBURG, VILLAGE OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEE'S SUMMIT, CITY OF
LEVASY, CITY OF
LEWIS AND CLARK, VILLAGE OF
LEWIS COUNTY *
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LIBERTY, CITY OF
LICKING, CITY OF
LILBOURN, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LINN CREEK, CITY OF
LINNEUS, CITY OF
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LOCKWOOD, CITY OF
LOUISIANA, CITY OF
LUPUS, CITY OF
MACKENZIE, VILLAGE OF
MACKS CREEK, VILLAGE OF
MACON, CITY OF
MADISON, CITY OF
MALDEN,C ITY OF
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MANSFIELD, CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, CITY OF
MARBLE HILL, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE FORMER CITY OF LUTESVILLE
MARCELINE, CITY OF
MARIES COUNTY*
MARION COUNTY *
MARIONVILLE, CITY OF
MARLBOROUGH, VILLAGE OF
MARQUAND, CITY OF
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MARSHFIELD, CITY OF
MARSTON, CITY OF
MARTHASVILLE, CITY OF
MARYLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MARYVILLE, CITY OF
County
AUDRAIN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LACLEDE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
TEXAS COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
DADE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MONITEAU COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BOLLINGER COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
MARIES COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
NODAWAY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/24/84(R)
03/16/76(R)
09/04/86(R)
07/13/76(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/18/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/15/85(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/05/96(R)
12/21/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/01/89(R)
02/17/95
03/15/78(R)
09/04/86(R)
08/17/81(R)
03/15/84(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
12/19/00
04/03/78(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/19/78(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/03/88(R)
10/15/80(R)
06/16/81(R)
ll/23/73(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/26/83(R)
07/01/87(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/14/83(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
09/04/86
07/13/76
11/01/79
12/06/99
04/15/80(M)
09/29/86
08/23/00
12/19/97
07/18/85(M)
12/05/96
12/21/84(M)
(NSFHA)
06/01/82
12/06/99
09/29/78
09/29/78
09/01/89(L)
07/25/75
02/01/85
09/04/86(M)
08/17/81
04/02/93
08/05/86
(NSFHA)
05/01/87(L)
04/03/78
01/03/86
08/23/00
09/04/85(M)
01/19/78
(NSFHA)
06/03/88
08/23/00
06/16/81(M)
08/23/00
08/15/90
09/18/85(M)
07/01/87(L)
05/16/77
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
1 1/04/88
(NSFHA)
08/17/81
11/17/82
08/23/00
09/18/85(M)
Page 7 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290254#
290817#
290892#
290408#
295267#
290434#
290499
290226#
290687#
290571A
29078 1#
290097#
290305#
290052#
290370#
290023#
290237#
290688A
290242#
290255#
290244#
290412
290142#
290098#
29069 1#
290456A
290165#
290202#
2903 14B
290046#
290265#
290442B
290500#
290550#
290133#
290849#
290256#
295268A
290820#
290078#
290218#
290059#
290371#
290099B
290293#
290372#
290867#
Community Name
MATTHEWS, CITY OF
MCDONALD COUNTY *
MCKITTRICK, TOWN OF
MEMPHIS, CITY OF
MEXICO, CITY OF
MILAN, CITY OF
MILL SPRING, VILLAGE OF
MILLER COUNTY*
MINER, VILLAGE OF
MINERAL POINT, VILLAGE OF
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY *
MISSOURI CITY, CITY OF
MOBERLY, CITY OF
MOKANE, VILLAGE OF
MOLINE ACRES, CITY OF
MONETT, CITY OF
MONITEAU COUNTY*
MONROE CITY, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MOREHOUSE, CITY OF
MORGAN COUNTY*
MORLEY, CITY OF
MORRISON, CITY OF
MOSBY, CITY OF
MOUND CITY, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN GROVE, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF
MT. VERNON, CITY OF
NAYLOR, CITY OF
NEELYVILLE, CITY OF
NEOSHO, CITY OF
NEVADA, CITY OF
NEW FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
NEW HAMPTON, CITY OF
NEW HAVEN, CITY OF
NEW MADRID COUNTY *
NEW MADRID, CITY OF
NEWBURG, CITY OF
NEWTON COUNTY *
NIXA, CITY OF
NOEL, CITY OF
NORBORNE, CITY OF
NORMANDY, CITY OF
NORTH KANSAS CITY, CITY OF
NORTHMOOR, CITY OF
NORTHWOODS, CITY OF
NORWOOD COURT, VILLAGE OF
County
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
AUDRAIN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
CALLAWAY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MONITEAU COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
HOWELL COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
RIPLEY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/03/81(R)
03/01/00(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/26/72(R)
07/04/88(R)
09/13/99
10/19/98(R)
12/21/84(R)
03/15/93(R)
01/18/89(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/18/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
10/17/86(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/28/97
09/10/84(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/01/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/19/87(R)
05/05/81(R)
07/05/82(R)
02/15/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
05/01/94(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/05/90(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/28/72(R)
06/30/99(R)
04/22/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/01/94(R)
05/25/78(R)
03/05/76(R)
05/15/78(R)
12/02/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/81
03/01/00(L)
09/30/88(M)
08/01/86(L)
02/16/83
07/04/88
02/15/84
09/30/87(M)
04/03/87(M)
03/15/93(M)
01/18/89
08/15/79
11/09/82
09/18/86
08/23/00
04/15/81
10/17/86
09/04/86(M)
03/01/87(L)
07/16/81
09/30/83
(NSFHA)
09/18/86
09/01/78
01/06/88
09/01/86(L)
08/01/80
08/15/83
08/19/87(M)
05/05/81
07/05/82
02/15/85(M)
01/19/83
05/01/94(L)
02/18/81
09/05/90
06/15/79
02/20/76
04/17/85
09/22/99
09/04/85(M)
05/01/94(L)
(NSFHA)
04/30/76
05/15/78
08/23/00
08/23/00
Page 8 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290003#
290316#
290694#
290373#
290695#
290669
29021 1#
290374#
290185#
290309#
290671
290268#
290375#
290143
290079#
290134#
290377#
290241 A
290920A
290294#
290258#
290674#
290116#
290878#
290779#
290427
290280#
290282
290823#
290677A
290824#
29045 IB
290203#
290286#
290679A
290379#
290862
290295#
290475#
290536
290106#
295269#
290100#
290047#
2903 17#
Community Name
NOVINGER, CITY OF
O'FALLON, CITY OF
OAK GROVE, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
OAKVIEW, VILLAGE OF
ODESSA, CITY OF
OLD MONROE, CITY OF
OLIVETTE, CITY OF
ORONOGO, CITY OF
ORRICK, CITY OF
OSAGE BEACH, CITY OF
OSAGE COUNTY
OVERLAND, CITY OF
OWENSVILLE, CITY OF
OZARK, CITY OF
PACIFIC, CITY OF
PAGEDALE, CITY OF
PARIS, CITY OF
PARK HILLS, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITIES OF FLAT RIVER, ESTHER AND
ELVINS AND THE VILLAGE OF RIVERMINES.
PARKVILLE, CITY OF
PARMA, CITY OF
PASADENA HILLS, CITY OF
PATTONSBURG, CITY OF
PECULIAR, CITY OF
PEMISCOT COUNTY *
PENERMON, CITY OF
PERRY COUNTY*
PERRYVILLE, CITY OF
PETTIS COUNTY *
PEVELY, CITY OF
PHELPS COUNTY*
PIEDMONT, CITY OF
PIERCE CITY, CITY OF
PIKE COUNTY *
PILOT KNOB, CITY OF
PINE LAWN, CITY OF
PINHOOK, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF PINHOOK HAS ADOPTED THE
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY (290781) FIRM DATED 1-18-89.
PLATTE CITY, CITY OF
PLATTE COUNTY*
PLATTE WOODS, CITY OF
PLATTSBURG, CITY OF
PLEASANT HILL, CITY OF
PLEASANT VALLEY, CITY OF
POPLAR BLUFF, CITY OF
PORTAGE DBS SIOUX, CITY OF
County
AD AIR COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
GASCONADE
COUNTY
CHRISTIAN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
PETTIS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/05/79(R)
01/16/81(R)
1 1/06/79(R)
04/11/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
07/03/78(R)
03/04/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
04/11/00
02/02/90(R)
10/15/80(R)
06/03/78(R)
02/01/85(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/05/76(R)
03/22/95(R)
05/15/78(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/03/79(R)
01/06/88(R)
08/04/83(R)
05/01/94(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/28/93(R)
05/01/89(R)
04/16/90(R)
01/03/85(R)
1 l/28/97(R)
05/15/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
01/26/83(R)
02/02/83(R)
09/15/72(R)
07/18/77(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/81
12/06/99
09/05/79
08/23/00
1 1/06/79(M)
(NSFHA)
06/05/85
08/23/00
03/04/85
01/19/83
07/30/76
02/02/90
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
02/01/85(M)
02/19/92
08/23/00
03/05/76
02/18/98
05/15/78
08/17/81
(NSFHA)
09/18/87
05/15/86(M)
05/17/82
(NSFHA)
01/06/88
(NSFHA)
05/01/94(L)
09/18/85(M)
02/01/87(L)
09/30/88(M)
10/15/81
05/01/89(L)
04/16/90(M)
(NSFHA)
05/15/78
06/04/87
(NSFHA)
02/02/83
07/03/85
07/18/77
02/19/97
12/06/99
Page 9 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290259#
290447B
290101#
290225C
290826#
290539
290428B
290048#
290302#
290102#
290778#
290070A
290176#
290484#
290433B
290148#
290083
290829#
290243C
290656
290380#
290657
290543A
290830#
290260#
290296#
290381#
290038#
290382#
290012#
29043 8 A
290658
290285#
290008A
290019
290042
290486B
290120#
290834#
290186#
290664
290414#
290837#
290283#
290131A
290269#
290665
290386#
Community Name
PORTAGEVILLE, CITY OF
POTOSI, CITY OF
PRATHERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PULASKI COUNTY *
PURCELL, CITY OF
PUXICO, CITY OF
QULIN, CITY OF
RALLS COUNTY *
RANDOLPH, VILLAGE OF
RAY COUNTY *
RAYMORE, CITY OF
RAYTOWN, CITY OF
REDINGS MILL, VILLAGE OF
REEDS SPRING, CITY OF
REPUBLIC, CITY OF
REVERE, VILLAGE OF
REYNOLDS COUNTY*
RHINELAND, TOWN OF
RICHLAND, CITY OF
RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RIDGEWAY, CITY OF
RIPLEY COUNTY*
RISCO, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIVERVIEW, VILLAGE OF
ROCHEPORT, CITY OF
ROCK HILL, CITY OF
ROCK PORT, CITY OF
ROCKAWAY BEACH, TOWN OF
ROGERSVILLE, CITY OF
ROLLA, CITY OF
ROSENDALE, CITY OF
RUSH HILL, VILLAGE OF
RUSHVILLE, CITY OF
SAGINAW, VILLAGE OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SALINE COUNTY *
SARCOXIE, CITY OF
SAVANNAH, CITY OF
SCOTT CITY, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF ILLMO
SCOTT COUNTY*
SEDALIA, CITY OF
SENATH, CITY OF
SENECA, CITY OF
SHELBINA, CITY OF
SHREWSBURY, CITY OF
County
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
RALLS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
REYNOLDS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
RIPLEY COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
TANEY COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
AUDRAIN COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
DENT COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
ANDREW COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
PETTIS COUNTY
DUNKLIN COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/15/78(R)
02/14/76(R)
04/17/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
07/17/86(R)
10/15/81(R)
05/01/89(R)
07/18/77(R)
01/19/83(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/15/78(R)
03/04/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/04/83(R)
03/01/93(R)
10/24/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/16/77(R)
05/01/99(R)
03/25/77(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/30/77(R)
04/17/79(R)
08/02/82(R)
05/16/77(R)
12/16/80(R)
03/01/00(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/10/93(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/01/89(R)
07/16/79(R)
12/21/78(R)
05/04/88(R)
04/03/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/15/77(R)
12/30/98
01/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/02/90
09/04/85(M)
11/15/78
05/14/76
04/17/85
(NSFHA)
07/17/86(M)
10/15/81
05/01/89(L)
07/18/77
01/19/83
05/15/86(M)
09/15/78
09/04/85
09/18/85(M)
06/04/80
(NSFHA)
09/30/88(M)
09/04/86(M)
(NSFHA)
08/02/95
05/01/99(L)
03/25/77(M)
01/17/86
08/03/81
06/04/87
08/23/00
08/02/82
08/23/00
12/16/80
03/01/00(L)
(NSFHA)
12/17/93
08/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
08/01/79
04/01/89(L)
03/01/84
(NSFHA)
05/04/88
09/06/89
01/05/96
07/01/87(L)
06/29/82
04/25/75
08/23/00
Page 10 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
295270#
290212#
290524
290406
290526
295271#
290528B
290149#
290383#
2903 15#
2903 18#
290135
290832#
290661 A
290384#
290043#
290327#
290385#
290326#
290900#
290319#
290147B
290833#
290325#
290279#
290114#
290117A
290845#
290429#
290506
29007 1#
290039A
290178#
290136#
290076#
290387#
290407B
290884#
290013B
290267#
290389#
290297#
290153#
290510#
29064 1#
290511
290228A
Community Name
SIKESTON, CITY OF
SILEX, VILLAGE OF
SILVER CREEK, VILLAGE OF
SLATER, CITY OF
SMITHTON, CITY OF
SMITHVILLE, CITY OF
SOUTHWEST CITY, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. ANN, CITY OF
ST. CHARLES COUNTY *
ST. CHARLES, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR,CITY OF
ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY*
ST. JAMES, CITY OF
ST. JOHN, CITY OF
ST. JOSEPH, CITY OF
ST. LOUIS COUNTY *
ST. LOUIS, CITY OF
ST. MARY, CITY OF
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
ST. PETERS, CITY OF
STANBERRY, CITY OF
STE. GENEVIEVE COUNTY*
STE. GENEVIEVE, CITY OF
STEELE, CITY OF
STEELVILLE, CITY OF
STEWARTSVILLE, CITY OF
STODDARD COUNTY*
STONE COUNTY
STRAFFORD, CITY OF
STRASBURG, CITY OF
STURGEON, CITY OF
SUGAR CREEK, CITY OF
SULLIVAN, CITY OF
SUMNER, CITY OF
SUNSET HILLS, CITY OF
SWEET SPRINGS, CITY OF
SYCAMORE HILLS, VILLAGE OF
TARKIO, CITY OF
THAYER,CITY OF
TOWN AND COUNTRY, CITY OF
TRACY, CITY OF
TRENTON, CITY OF
TRIMBLE, CITY OF
TROY, CITY OF
TRUESDALE, VILLAGE OF
TUSCUMBIA, VILLAGE OF
County
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
PETTIS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ST. FRANCOIS
COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
STE. GENEVIEVE CO.
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
GENTRY COUNTY
STE. GENEVIEVE CO.
STE. GENEVIEVE CO.
PEMISCOT COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DE KALB COUNTY
STODDARD COUNTY
STONE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHARITON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
OREGON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MILLER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/03/71(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/04/83(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/21/71(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/03/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
03/22/74(R)
09/10/84(R)
02/01/87(R)
07/03/85(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
09/15/77(R)
02/13/98(R)
05/01/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/03/87(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/13/76(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/19/97(R)
07/30/99(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/27/93(R)
09/01/77(R)
10/05/84(R)
04/30/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/01/87(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/02/80(R)
04/01/82(R)
05/05/81(R)
12/29/00(R)
03/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/17/85
09/16/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/04/92
09/04/85(M)
10/16/91
08/23/00
12/06/99
12/06/99
(NSFHA)
02/01/87(L)
07/03/85(M)
08/23/00
09/19/84
08/23/00
03/15/93
08/16/88
12/06/99
12/06/99
09/04/85(M)
04/03/87
09/30/77
09/05/79
1 1/25/77
08/19/85(M)
07/01/87(L)
03/17/97
(NSFHA)
07/16/80(M)
05/01/87(L)
01/03/79
06/15/81
02/02/83
08/23/00
10/05/84(M)
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
01/01/87(L)
08/23/00
06/15/79
12/02/80
04/01/82
05/05/81
(NSFHA)
03/01/87(L)
Page 11 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290512B
290137#
290301#
290390
290391#
290472A
290020#
290879
290516A
290857#
290643#
290841#
290247B
290647
290392#
290473#
290631
290632A
290443#
290194#
290648#
290030#
290393#
290138#
2900 14A
290084B
290449#
290300A
290634
290187#
290394#
29090 1#
290395#
290320#
290924#
290166#
290298#
290272
290396#
290903#
290922#
290653
290452B
290167#
290235#
290397#
290156B
290213#
Community Name
UNION STAR, CITY OF
UNION, CITY OF
UNIONVILLE, CITY OF
UNIVERSITY CITY, CITY OF
VALLEY PARK, CITY OF
VAN BUREN, CITY OF
VANDALIA, CITY OF
VANDIVER, VILLAGE OF
VANDUSER, VILLAGE OF
VELDA VILLAGE HILLS, VILLAGE OF
VELDA VILLAGE, CITY OF
VERNON COUNTY*
VERSAILLES, CITY OF
VIENNA, CITY OF
VINITA PARK, CITY OF
WAKENDA, TOWN OF
WALKER, CITY OF
WARDELL, CITY OF
WARREN COUNTY
WARRENSBURG, CITY OF
WARRENTON, CITY OF
WARSAW,CITY OF
WARSON WOODS, CITY OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WATSON, VILLAGE OF
WAYLAND, CITY OF
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNESVILLE, CITY OF
WEAUBLEAU, CITY OF
WEBB CITY, CITY OF
WEBSTER GROVES, CITY OF
WELDON SPRING, CITY OF
WELLSTON, CITY OF
WENTZVILLE, CITY OF
WEST ALTON, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF WEST ALTON HAS ADOPTED THE ST.
CHARLES COUNTY (290315) FIRM DATED 8-2-96.
WEST PLAINS, CITY OF
WESTON, CITY OF
WESTPHALIA, CITY OF
WESTWOOD, TOWN OF
WHITEWATER, VILLAGE OF
WILDWOOD, CITY OF
THE CITY OF WILDWOOD HAS ADOPTED THE ST.
LOUIS COUNTY[ 290327] FIRM DATED 8/5/95.
WILLARD, CITY OF
WILLIAMSVILLE, CITY OF
WILLOW SPRINGS, CITY OF
WILSON CITY, CITY OF
WINCHESTER, CITY OF
WINDSOR, CITY OF
WINFIELD, CITY OF
County
DE KALB COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
AUDRAIN COUNTY
AUDRAIN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MARIES COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
PEMISCOT COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
HICKORY COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
ST. CHARLES
COUNTY
HOWELL COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
COUNT
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
HOWELL COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/85(R)
03/02/83(R)
1 l/27/79(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/04/88(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/01/90(R)
08/04/83(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/10/84(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/03/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/16/83(R)
08/04/87(R)
11/01/79(R)
11/03/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
10/06/76(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/02/93(R)
05/19/81(R)
07/28/78(R)
07/09/97(R)
05/19/81(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/26/98(R)
04/02/98(R)
02/28/97(R)
02/11/98
08/01/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/85(M)
03/02/83
1 l/27/79(M)
08/23/00
08/23/00
09/01/86(L)
02/04/88
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
09/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/01/85
(NSFHA)
06/30/76(M)
06/16/99
07/16/90
05/16/83
07/16/90
(NSFHA)
11/03/82
09/01/90(L)
09/04/86(M)
02/01/87(L)
10/06/76
(NSFHA)
06/01/82
08/23/00
12/06/99
08/23/00
12/06/99
12/06/99
12/03/93
06/15/79
(NSFHA)
08/23/00
11/04/92(M)
11/05/76
08/01/86(L)
08/15/79
01/18/89
08/23/00
09/18/85(M)
11/17/82
Page 12 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290419B
290398#
290842
290085
290236#
Community Name
WINONA, CITY OF
WOODSON TERRACE, CITY OF
WORTH COUNTY *
WYACONDA, CITY OF
WYATT, CITY OF
County
SHANNON COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
WORTH COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MISSISSIPPI COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/86(R)
06/20/76(R)
10/10/97
09/10/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/18/89
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 561
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 542
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 78
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 126
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 19
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 13
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 13 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
29000 1#
290281
29006 IB
290199#
290767
290756
290616
290759
290618
290111
290850
290624
290022#
290743#
290196A
290605
290610
290797#
290146A
290055
290118#
290613
290465A
290219
290895#
290593
290733
290460
290803#
290804#
290573
290576A
290575
290715A
290577
290361#
290698#
290558
29092 1#
290559
290813#
290115
290503#
290402B
290271 A
290404#
Community Name
"MISSOURI
ADAIR COUNTY*
APPLETON CITY, CITY OF
ARCHIE, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
BEVIER, CITY OF
BRASHEAR, CITY OF
BRAYMER, CITY OF
BRONAUGH, CITY OF
BUNCETON, CITY OF
CALEDONIA, VILLAGE OF
CAMDEN, CITY OF
CASSVILLE, CITY OF
CHARLACK, CITY OF
CONWAY, TOWN OF
COWGILL, TOWN OF
CROSS TIMBERS, VILLAGE OF
DALLAS COUNTY *
DARLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
DELTA, CITY OF
DENT COUNTY
DBS ARC, VILLAGE OF
DEWITT, CITY OF
ELMER, CITY OF
FERRELVIEW, VILLAGE OF
FRANKFORD, CITY OF
GALLATIN, CITY OF
GRANDIN, CITY OF
HARRISON COUNTY *
HENRY COUNTY *
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HOUSTON LAKE, VILLAGE OF
HOUSTONIA, CITY OF
HUMANSVILLE, CITY OF
HUME, CITY OF
KINLOCH, CITY OF
LAKE OZARK, CITY OF
LAKE WINNEBAGO, VILLAGE OF
LAMAR HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
LANAGAN, CITY OF
LINN COUNTY *
LOCK SPRINGS, TOWN OF
MACON COUNTY *
MALTA BEND, CITY OF
META, TOWN OF
MIAMI, CITY OF
County
ADAIR COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
OZARK COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
ADAIR COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
COOPER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
BARRY COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
LACLEDE COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
HICKORY COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
GENTRY COUNTY
CAPE GIRARDEAU
CO.
DENT COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PETTIS COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
BARTON COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
DAVIESS COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
11/16/83
02/07/75
09/12/78(F)
09/15/78(F)
04/25/75
02/14/75
02/14/75
04/25/75
06/25/76
04/25/75
11/05/76
05/28/76
04/15/77(F)
1 l/23/84(F)
05/10/74
04/18/75
02/21/75
09/15/83
08/19/85(F)
12/06/74
01/05/84
04/18/75
09/06/74
12/06/74
05/17/89(F)
01/07/77
02/14/75
1 1/08/74
01/18/84
04/19/83
10/22/76
06/21/77
09/19/75
07/11/75
02/21/75
01/16/81(F)
07/26/77
02/25/77
06/19/97(F)
06/04/76
12/15/83(F)
07/11/75
01/18/84
08/19/85(F)
09/13/74
12/04/84(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
11/16/84
02/07/76
03/05/90(8)
11/15/78(8)
04/25/76
02/14/76
02/14/76
04/25/76
06/25/77
04/25/76
11/05/77
05/28/77
05/02/77(8)
07/18/85(8)
05/10/75
04/18/76
02/21/76
09/15/84
08/19/85(8)
12/06/75
01/05/85
04/18/76
09/06/75
12/06/75
05/17/90
01/07/78
02/14/76
1 1/08/75
01/18/85
04/19/84
10/22/77
06/21/78
09/19/76
07/11/76
02/21/76
08/03/89(8)
07/26/78
02/25/78
06/19/98
06/04/77
12/15/84
07/11/76
01/18/85
08/19/85(8)
09/13/75
07/05/84(8)
Page 14 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
290568
290690
290547#
290549A
290692A
290821#
290257#
290554B
290413B
290672
290378#
290535
290537
290825#
290828#
290655
290485
290518
290177#
290527
29083 1#
290488
290667
290262#
290435A
290876#
290509#
290514
290893#
290645
290483
290635
290639
290112#
290654#
290843#
290033#
Community Name
MIDDLETOWN, CITY OF
MONTROSE, CITY OF
NAPOLEON, CITY OF
NEW CAMBRIA, CITY OF
NEW FLORENCE, CITY OF
NODAWAY COUNTY *
NORTH LILBOURN, VILLAGE OF
OAK GROVE, VILLAGE OF
ORAN, CITY OF
OSCEOLA, CITY OF
PEERLESS PARK, VILLAGE OF
PINEVILLE, CITY OF
PLEASANT HOPE, VILLAGE OF
POLK COUNTY *
RANDOLPH COUNTY *
RICH HILL, CITY OF
RITCHEY, TOWN OF
ROCKVILLE, CITY OF
SIBLEY, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH GORIN, CITY OF
ST. CLAIR COUNTY *
STELLA, CITY OF
STOCKTON, CITY OF
TALLAPOOSA, CITY OF
TANEY COUNTY*
TAOS, CITY OF
TARSNEY LAKES, VILLAGE OF
URBANA, VILLAGE OF
UTICA, VILLAGE OF
VERONA, CITY OF
WENTWORTH, TOWN OF
WESTBORO, VILLAGE OF
WOOD HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
WOOLDRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
WRIGHT CITY, CITY OF
WRIGHT COUNTY *
ZALMA, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NODAWAY COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MCDONALD COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
BATES COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
NEW MADRID
COUNTY
TANEY COUNTY
COLE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
ATCHISON COUNTY
RAY COUNTY
COOPER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WRIGHT COUNTY
BOLLINGER COUNTY
1
12
1
Hazard Area
Identified
08/06/76
04/18/75
06/11/76
09/04/86(F)
09/04/86(F)
04/17/85(F)
08/03/81(F)
08/19/86(F)
09/18/85(F)
04/02/76
06/1 5/8 1(F)
04/18/75
10/29/76
11/02/83
09/30/83
02/14/75
01/10/75
02/21/75
05/15/85(F)
11/05/76
02/01/84
02/21/75
07/02/76
08/03/81(F)
01/18/84
08/19/86(F)
12/16/80(F)
06/27/75
09/02/88(F)
10/15/76
01/10/75
07/11/75
1 1/05/76
12/04/84(F)
01/03/85(F)
04/17/85(F)
08/15/90(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
08/06/77
04/18/76
06/11/77
07/25/76
1 1/05/77
09/15/84
07/04/89(8)
06/03/78
09/18/85(8)
04/02/77
06/15/81(8)
04/18/76
10/29/77
11/02/84
09/30/84
02/14/76
01/10/76
02/21/76
01/16/77
11/05/77
02/01/85
02/21/76
07/02/77
08/03/81(8)
01/18/85
03/04/81
10/22/77
06/27/76
09/02/89
10/15/77
01/10/76
07/11/76
1 1/05/77
12/04/84(8)
02/07/76
10/18/84
03/14/97(W)
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 79
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 79
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
Page 15 of 16
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 16 of 16 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
300017#
300018#
300001#
300105
300009#
300143#
300106
300085#
300144#
300035B
300028#
300058#
300145#
300030#
300077#
300139#
300008#
300041B
300003#
300097#
300108A
300024#
300109
300057A
300067B
300147#
300062#
300140#
300060#
300020#
300088#
300053B
300033#
300039#
300111
300044#
300112#
300064B
300149#
300019#
300023#
300070
Communities Participating
Community Name
"MONTANA
ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY
BAKER, CITY OF
BEAVERHEAD COUNTY*
BELGRADE, CITY OF
BELT, TOWN OF
BIG HORN COUNTY *
BIG TIMBER, CITY OF
BILLINGS, CITY OF
ELAINE COUNTY*
BOULDER, TOWN OF
BOZEMAN, CITY OF
BROADUS, TOWN OF
BROADWATER COUNTY*
BROWNING, TOWN OF
BUTTE-SILVER BOW COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY *
CASCADE COUNTY *
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHINOOK, CITY OF
CHOTEAU, CITY OF
CIRCLE, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA FALLS, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, TOWN OF
CONRAD, CITYOF
CULBERTSON, CITY OF
CUSTER COUNTY*
DARBY, TOWN OF
DAWSON COUNTY *
DEER LODGE, CITY OF
DENTON, TOWN OF
DILLON, CITY OF
DODSON, TOWN OF
DRUMMOND, TOWN OF
EAST HELENA, CITY OF
EKALAKA, TOWN OF
ENNIS, TOWN OF
EUREKA, TOWN OF
FAIRVIEW, CITY OF
FALLON COUNTY*
FERGUS COUNTY *
FLATHEAD COUNTY*
FORSYTH, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
DEER LODGE
COUNTY
FALLON COUNTY
BEAVERHEAD
COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
CASCADE COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
SWEET GRASS
COUNTY
YELLOWSTONE
COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
POWDER RIVER
COUNTY
BROADWATER
COUNTY
GLACIER COUNTY
SILVER BOW COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CASCADE COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
MCCONE COUNTY
FLATHEAD COUNTY
STILLWATER
COUNTY
PONDEROSA COUNTY
ROOSEVELT COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
RAVALLI COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY
FERGUS COUNTY
BEAVERHEAD
COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
GRANITE COUNTY
LEWIS & CLARK
COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
FALLON COUNTY
FERGUS COUNTY
FLATHEAD COUNTY
ROSEBUD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/18/85(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/30/82(R)
07/09/97
12/05/79(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/06/97(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/15/86(R)
03/15/82(R)
03/18/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/01/86(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/03/84(R)
04/15/86(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/02/97(R)
06/01/86(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
1 1/02/98(R)
05/01/99(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/06/97
06/01/86(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/15/86(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/05/84(R)
09/01/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/18/85
08/04/88
09/30/82
09/27/85
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
05/19/87
04/15/86(M)
07/15/88
03/18/86(M)
12/01/86(L)
03/18/86(M)
02/23/82
08/15/90
11/16/83
06/01/86(L)
05/19/87
04/03/84
04/15/86(M)
10/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
06/01/86(L)
05/15/86(M)
09/01/87(L)
09/07/98
05/01/99(L)
04/15/81
09/17/97
07/05/82
06/17/86(M)
07/05/82
09/27/85
07/16/76
11/19/86
07/02/79
05/15/86(M)
08/04/88
12/01/82
10/16/96
09/01/97(L)
Page 1 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
300180#
300013
300187#
300005#
300027#
300151#
300178
300015#
300152#
300141#
300010#
300186#
300115
300004#
300175#
300179#
300040#
300153#
300095#
300073#
300154#
300006#
300025#
300155#
300086#
30003 1#
300038#
300022#
300042#
300156
300177#
300157#
30005 1#
300002#
300043
300054#
300046
300014#
300159#
300048#
300049#
300100#
300174#
300082B
300183#
300160#
300117#
300162#
Community Name
FORT BELKNAP INDIAN RESERVE
FORT BENTON, CITY OF
FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION
FROMBERG, TOWN OF
GALLATIN COUNTY *
GLACIER COUNTY*
GLASGOW, CITY OF
GLENDIVE, CITY OF
GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTY *
GRANITE COUNTY*
GREAT FALLS, CITY OF
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HARDIN, CITY OF
HARLEM, CITY OF
HARLOWTON, CITY OF
HAVRE, CITY OF
HELENA, CITY OF
HILL COUNTY*
HINGHAM, TOWN OF
HOT SPRINGS, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JOLIET, TOWN OF
KALISPELL, CITY OF
LAKE COUNTY*
LAUREL, CITY OF
LAVINA, TOWN OF
LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY *
LEWISTOWN, CITY OF
LIBBY, CITY OF
LIBERTY COUNTY *
LIMA, TOWN OF
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LODGE GRASS, TOWN OF
MADISON COUNTY
MALTA, CITY OF
MEAGHER COUNTY*
MILES CITY, CITY OF
MINERAL COUNTY*
MISSOULA COUNTY*
MISSOULA, CITY OF
MOORE, TOWN OF
MUSSELLSHELL COUNTY *
NASHUA, TOWN OF
NEIHART, TOWN OF
PARK COUNTY*
PHILIPSBURG, TOWN OF
PHILLIPS COUNTY*
County
ELAINE COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
CHOUTEAU COUNTY
ROOSEVELT COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
GLACIER COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
GRANITE COUNTY
CASCADE COUNTY
RAVALLI COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
WHEATLAND
COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
LEWIS & CLARK
COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
SANDERS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
FLATHEAD COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
YELLOWSTONE
COUNTY
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
LEWIS & CLARK
COUNTY
FERGUS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BEAVERHEAD
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
MEAGHER COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
MISSOULA COUNTY
MISSOULA COUNTY
FERGUS COUNTY
MUSSELSHELL
COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
CASCADE COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
GRANITE COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/17/87(R)
1 1/06/96(R)
10/07/96
1 1/04/8 1(R)
08/01/84(R)
01/01/90(R)
11/12/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/30/77(R)
11/10/89(R)
06/08/95(R)
05/19/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
12/11/85(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/03/88(R)
06/03/88(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/17/87(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/16/81(R)
04/01/81(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/02/79(R)
04/09/97
03/04/86(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/19/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
08/09/97(R)
05/19/87(R)
11/13/85(R)
02/01/80(R)
11/01/96(R)
08/15/83(R)
01/06/83(R)
07/19/82(R)
03/01/01(R)
04/15/86(R)
05/06/97
01/01/87(R)
07/05/82(R)
05/19/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/17/87(M)
(NSFHA)
11/04/81
08/01/84
01/01/90(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/80
09/16/81
07/05/82
11/03/81
09/07/98
(NSFHA)
05/19/87
09/16/81
(NSFHA)
04/15/81
06/03/88
06/03/88
10/15/85(M)
06/17/86(M)
05/19/81
09/30/92
12/17/87
01/06/83
09/16/81
09/04/85
07/19/82
08/10/82
(NSFHA)
03/04/86
08/01/80
05/19/87
09/02/81
(NSFHA)
05/19/87
(NSFHA)
03/22/83
11/01/96(L)
08/16/88
08/16/88
07/19/82
05/29/79
04/15/86(M)
08/17/82
01/01/87(L)
07/05/82
05/19/87
Page 2 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
300074B
300119#
300056
300059#
300061#
300007#
300165#
300122#
300166#
300069#
300050#
300032#
300055
300072#
300125A
300126
300065#
300123
300078#
300128#
300167#
300168#
300029#
300169
300131A
300170#
300132#
300045#
300133
300171#
300172#
300047C
300026#
300120A
300084#
300142#
Community Name
PLAINS, TOWN OF
POLSON, CITY OF
PONDERA COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY *
RAVALLI COUNTY *
RED LODGE, CITY OF
RICHLAND COUNTY *
RONAN, CITY OF
ROOSEVELT COUNTY *
ROSEBUD COUNTY *
ROUNDUP, CITY OF
RYEGATE, TOWN OF
SACO , TOWN OF
SANDERS COUNTY *
SHELBY, CITY OF
SHERIDAN, TOWN OF
SIDNEY, CITY OF
ST. IGNATIUS, TOWN OF
COMMUNITY ADOPTED PREVIOUSLY RESC INDED
FHBM FOR THE TOWN DATED 2/14/75.
STILL WATER COUNTY*
SUPERIOR, TOWN OF
SWEET GRASS COUNTY *
TETON COUNTY *
THREE FORKS, TOWN OF
TOOLE COUNTY *
TOWNSEND, CITY OF
TREASURE COUNTY*
TROY, CITY OF
TWIN BRIDGES, TOWN OF
VALIER, TOWN OF
VALLEY COUNTY*
WHEATLAND COUNTY *
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CITY OF
WHITEFISH, CITY OF
WHITEHALL, TOWN OF
WIBAUX, TOWN OF
YELLOWSTONE COUNTY *
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
SANDERS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PONDERA COUNTY
POWELL COUNTY
RAVALLI COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ROOSEVELT COUNTY
ROSEBUD COUNTY
MUSSELSHELL
COUNTY
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
PHILLIPS COUNTY
SANDERS COUNTY
TOOLE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
STILLWATER
COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
SWEET GRASS
COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
GALLATIN COUNTY
TOOLE COUNTY
BROADWATER
COUNTY
TREASURE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PONDERA COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
WHEATLAND
COUNTY
MEAGHER COUNTY
FLATHEAD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WIBAUX COUNTY
YELLOWSTONE
COUNTY
126
119
11
36
7
2
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/86(R)
01/15/99(R)
06/06/97
06/03/8 1(R)
07/19/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
12/04/85(R)
12/17/87(R)
11/01/96(R)
09/01/97(R)
03/18/86(R)
07/20/82(R)
1 1/30/83(R)
03/01/96(R)
11/01/96(R)
04/07/98(R)
12/04/85(R)
05/08/97(R)
11/15/85(R)
0 1/05/0 1(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/18/83(R)
11/19/80(R)
04/09/97
09/29/86(R)
12/18/86(R)
12/16/80(R)
07/03/86(R)
1 1/30/83(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
04/15/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/04/87(R)
03/04/88(R)
11/18/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/86(M)
12/17/87(M)
09/30/94
09/07/98
05/19/81
12/04/85
12/17/87
11/01/96(L)
09/01/97(L)
03/18/86(M)
07/20/82(M)
(NSFHA)
03/01/96(L)
11/01/96(L)
12/04/85
(NSFHA)
02/04/87
01/05/01
08/02/82
07/18/83
11/19/80
(NSFHA)
09/29/86(M)
12/18/86(M)
12/16/80(M)
07/03/86(M)
(NSFHA)
01/01/87(L)
09/16/81
04/15/86(M)
07/16/79
06/04/87(M)
02/18/98
03/21/00
Page 3 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 4 of 5 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"MONTANA
300150# GARFIELD COUNTY *
300021 # GRAS S RANGE, TOWN OF
300116A JORDAN, TOWN OF
300163# POWDER RIVER COUNTY *
300164# PRAIRIE COUNTY *
300181# STEVENSVILLE, CITY OF
300127 SUNBURST, TOWN OF
300173# WIBAUX COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
GARFIELD COUNTY
FERGUS COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
POWDER RIVER
COUNTY
PRAIRIE COUNTY
RAVALLI COUNTY
TOOLE COUNTY
WIBAUX COUNTY
0
1
1
7
7
Hazard Area
Identified
03/20/79
12/01/82(F)
06/27/75
05/15/79
05/08/79
09/07/98(F)
01/10/75
08/05/86(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
03/20/80
09/21/93(W)
06/27/76
05/15/80
05/08/80
09/07/99
01/10/76
03/04/88(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 5 of 5
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310411#
310089
310338
310009#
310242
310244#
310011#
310245A
310050
310340#
310224
310227#
310196#
310154
310105#
310247#
310344
310346
310145#
310347#
310091#
310348A
310208#
310047B
310191#
310250
310251#
310074#
310228#
310352
310092#
310117#
310008#
310353
310141A
310151B
310012B
310155#
310051#
310128B
310027A
310419#
310420#
310354A
310255A
Communities Participating
Community Name
"NEBRASKA
ADAMS COUNTY *
ADAMS, VILLAGE OF
AINSWORTH, CITY OF
ALBION, CITY OF
ALDA, VILLAGE OF
ALLEN, VILLAGE OF
ALLIANCE, CITY OF
AMHERST, VILLAGE OF
ANSELMO, VILLAGE OF
ANSLEY, VILLAGE OF
ARCADIA, VILLAGE OF
ARLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
ASHLAND, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AVOCA, VILLAGE OF
AXTELL, VILLAGE OF
BASSETT, CITY OF
BATTLE CREEK, CITY OF
BAYARD, CITY OF
BEATRICE, CITY OF
BEAVER CITY, CITY OF
BEAVER CROSSING, VILLAGE OF
BEEMER, VILLAGE OF
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BENEDICT, VILLAGE OF
BENNET, VILLAGE OF
BENNINGTON, CITY OF
BLAIR, CITY OF
BLUE HILL, CITY OF
BLUE SPRINGS, CITY OF
BOELUS, VILLAGE OF
BOONE COUNTY*
BOYSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
BRADY, VILLAGE OF
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BRISTOW, VILLAGE OF
BROCK, VILLAGE OF
BROKEN BOW, CITY OF
BRULE, VILLAGE OF
BRUNO, VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO COUNTY*
BURT COUNTY *
Flood Hazard Boundary Map Numbers 310420
0001A-0008Adtd 11/22/77
BUR WELL, CITY OF
BUSHNELL, VILLAGE OF
in the National Flood Program
County
ADAMS COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
DIXON COUNTY
BOX BUTTE COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
KEARNEY COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MORRILL COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
FURNAS COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
CUMING COUNTY
SARPY COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MORRILL COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
KEITH COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
KIMBALL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/88(R)
03/18/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
04/02/86(R)
06/20/78(R)
07/02/87(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/04/86(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/03/79(R)
02/24/94(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/01/88(R)
09/30/77(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/19/87(R)
07/16/87(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/12/96
03/02/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/01/87(R)
03/01/90(R)
05/02/01
11/03/97
04/01/98
Current Effective
Map
06/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/06/99(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/87(M)
07/16/87(M)
09/27/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/19/87(M)
(NSFHA)
11/23/82
1 1/03/82
(NSFHA)
08/16/88
09/18/86
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/30/87(M)
09/03/97
01/03/85
08/01/86(L)
03/16/92(M)
07/16/87(M)
01/19/95
04/18/75
03/02/81
12/04/79
07/17/95
(NSFHA)
06/03/86
1 1/08/99(M)
12/06/99
(NSFHA)
06/03/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
06/03/86(M)
08/19/87(M)
09/29/78
09/27/85(M)
01/01/87(L)
03/01/90(L)
11/22/77
04/23/76
03/26/76
Page Iof9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310025
310101B
310087#
310256A
310407#
310356
310030#
310148#
310197#
310260
310358
310424#
310149#
310359
310040
310425#
310262#
310426#
315272#
310264
310059
310056B
310360A
310186#
310361#
310110A
310427#
310428#
310053#
310429#
310118#
310058#
310021#
310498
310218A
310430#
310187#
310270
310068#
310363#
310102
310073#
310162
310163B
310272
310432
310007A
310274
310042
310002B
310075#
310014#
310366A
3 10276 A
310080
Community Name
BUTLER COUNTY*
CAIRO, VILLAGE OF
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CAMPBELL, VILLAGE OF
CASS COUNTY *
CEDAR BLUFFS, VILLAGE OF
CEDAR CREEK, VILLAGE OF
CENTRAL CITY, CITY OF
CERESCO, VILLAGE OF
CHAPMAN, VILLAGE OF
CHAPPELL, CITY OF
CHEYENNE COUNTY *
CLARKS, VILLAGE OF
CLARKSON, CTIY OF
CLAY CENTER, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY*
CLEARWATER, VILLAGE OF
COLFAX COUNTY*
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
CORTLAND, VILLAGE OF
COZAD, CITY OF
CRAWFORD, CITY OF
CREIGHTON, CITY OF
CRETE, CITY OF
CROFTON, VILLAGE OF
CULBERTSON, VILLAGE OF
CUMING COUNTY *
CUSTER COUNTY *
DAKOTA CITY, CITY OF
DAKOTA COUNTY *
DANNEBROG, VILLAGE OF
DAWSON COUNTY*
DECATUR, VILLAGE OF
DENTON, VILLAGE OF
DESHLER, CITY OF
DEUEL COUNTY*
DEWITT, VILLAGE OF
DIX, VILLAGE OF
DODGE COUNTY*
DODGE, VILLAGE OF
DONIPHAN, VILLAGE OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DOUGLAS, VILLAGE OF
DUNBAR, VILLAGE OF
DUNCAN, VILLAGE OF
DUNDY COUNTY *
DUNNING, VILLAGE OF
EAGLE, VILLAGE OF
EDGAR, CITY OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELKHORN, CITY OF
ELM CREEK, VILLAGE OF
EMERSON, VILLAGE OF
EUSTIS, VILLAGE OF
EXETER, VILLAGE OF
County
BUTLER COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
FURNAS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MERRICK COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
MERRICK COUNTY
DEUEL COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
MERRICK COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
DAWES COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HITCHCOCK COUNTY
CUMING COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
THAYER COUNTY
DEUEL COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
KIMBALL COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
DUNDY COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
DIXON COUNTY
FRONTIER COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/29/98
06/20/78(R)
03/28/80(R)
03/01/01(R)
09/02/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/15/78(R)
08/15/79(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/26/96
04/15/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
12/18/86(R)
07/29/98(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
06/29/73(R)
08/26/77(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/01/96(R)
10/15/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/96(R)
06/03/93
09/16/81(R)
04/15/82(R)
01/03/90(R)
07/01/88(R)
06/16/92(R)
07/09/98
02/01/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
10/15/82(R)
05/12/99
08/17/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/22/95
10/25/91
07/01/87(R)
08/26/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/01/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/20/78(M)
03/28/80
03/01/01(L)
05/19/87
(NSFHA)
09/15/78
09/21/98
07/03/86(M)
03/26/76
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
08/19/87(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
02/01/87(L)
09/21/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/01/86(L)
09/01/96(L)
10/15/82
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
04/01/96(L)
03/14/78
09/16/81
06/18/96
01/03/90
07/01/88(L)
06/16/92(M)
02/01/87(L)
01/01/87(L)
10/15/82
(NSFHA)
06/05/97
01/02/81
(NSFHA)
01/16/81
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
02/18/77
07/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/17/86
08/15/79
08/19/87(M)
09/01/86(L)
03/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
Page 2 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310120#
310367
310182
310135#
310368#
310082A
310069#
310369
310152A
310088#
310096
310370
310153B
310371#
310015B
310062#
310103#
310373A
310374#
310234A
310490
310100#
310441#
310376#
310043
310001#
310213B
310219#
310378A
310229
310142#
310136#
310173B
310288A
310241#
310379#
310289A
310446#
310380#
310220#
310183#
310382#
310115
310198A
310292#
310447#
310293#
310448
310016#
310487#
Community Name
FAIRBURY, CITY OF
FAIRMONT, CITY OF
FALLS CITY, CITY OF
FIRTH, VILLAGE OF
FORT CALHOUN, CITY OF
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FREMONT, CITY OF
FRIEND, CITY OF
FULLERTON, CITY OF
GAGE COUNTY*
GARDEN COUNTY
GENEVA, CITY OF
GENOA, CITY OF
GERING, CITY OF
GIBBON, CITY OF
GOTHENBURG, CITY OF
GRAND ISLAND, CITY OF
GREELEY, VILLAGE OF
GREENWOOD, VILLAGE OF
GUIDE ROCK, VILLAGE OF
GURLEY, VILLAGE OF
HALL COUNTY*
HAMILTON COUNTY *
HARTINGTON, CITY OF
HARVARD, CITY OF
HASTINGS, CITY OF
HAY SPRINGS, CITY OF
HEBRON,CITY OF
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HERMAN, VILLAGE OF
HERSHEY, VILLAGE OF
HICKMAN, VILLAGE OF
HOLDREGE, CITY OF
HOLSTEIN, VILLAGE OF
HOMER, VILLAGE OF
HOOPER, CITY OF
HOSKINS, VILLAGE OF
HOWARD COUNTY *
HOWELLS, VILLAGE OF
HUBBELL, VILLAGE OF
HUMBOLT,CITY OF
INDIANOLA, CITY OF
INMAN, VILLAGE OF
ITHACA, VILLAGE OF
JACKSON, VILLAGE OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JUNIATA, VILLAGE OF
KEARNEY COUNTY *
KEARNEY, CITY OF
KEITH COUNTY *
County
JEFFERSON COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
RICHARDSON
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
NANCE COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
GARDEN COUNTY
FILLMORE COUNTY
NANCE COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
GREELEY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
THAYER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
THAYER COUNTY
RICHARDSON
COUNTY
RED WILLOW
COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
KEARNEY COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
KEITH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/03/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/01/83(R)
01/01/87(R)
02/01/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/01/87(R)
05/01/90(R)
06/10/97
09/24/84(R)
08/19/87(R)
02/15/79(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/03/90(R)
03/02/83(R)
06/26/95
06/03/80(R)
03/01/01(R)
07/14/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/21/93(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/17/81(R)
02/01/93(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/18/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
02/03/82(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/01/92(R)
04/03/84(R)
08/04/87(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/30/97(R)
06/02/8 1(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/19/87(R)
11/16/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/01/88(R)
06/18/90(R)
07/30/99
07/05/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/16/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/15/81
12/01/83
01/01/87(L)
02/01/79
(NSFHA)
02/01/87(L)
05/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
08/19/87(M)
02/15/79
09/27/85(M)
01/03/90
03/02/83
07/11/75
06/03/80(M)
03/01/01(L)
(NSFHA)
09/29/86
12/02/92
(NSFHA)
08/17/81
02/01/93(L)
07/16/87(M)
09/04/86(M)
(NSFHA)
08/19/87(M)
02/03/82
04/02/86(M)
04/01/92(L)
06/18/96
08/04/87
03/01/87(L)
11/08/99
08/19/91
02/01/87(L)
08/19/87(M)
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
05/01/87(L)
09/04/87(M)
06/01/88(L)
06/18/90
07/05/84
09/27/85(M)
Page 3 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310230#
310192#
310134#
310294
310386A
310097
310063#
310452#
315273#
310177#
310028A
310295A
310038A
310031#
310215A
310387
310013B
310022
310455#
310240#
310298
310200
310300A
310181#
310236#
310301
310146#
310457#
310209#
310389
310390#
310496
310305#
310392#
310032#
310003B
310158#
310460#
310306A
310393#
310132
310147#
310239#
310225A
310143#
310461
310116#
310023
310094A
310129#
315274#
310005
Community Name
KENNARD, VILLAGE OF
LA VISTA, CITY OF
LANCASTER COUNTY *
LAWRENCE, VILLAGE OF
LEIGH, VILLAGE OF
LEWELLEN, VILLAGE OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LINCOLN, CITY OF
LINDSAY, VILLAGE OF
LINWOOD, VILLAGE OF
LITCHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
LODGEPOLE, VILLAGE OF
LOUISVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LOUP CITY, CITY OF
LYMAN, VILLAGE OF
LYNCH, VILLAGE OF
LYONS, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY*
MADISON, CITY OF
MADRID, VILLAGE OF
MALMO, VILLAGE OF
MAXWELL, VILLAGE OF
MCCOOK, CITY OF
MCCOOL JUNCTION, VILLAGE OF
MEAD, VILLAGE OF
MEADOW GROVE, VILLAGE OF
MERRICK COUNTY *
MILFORD, CITY OF
MINDEN, CITY OF
MITCHELL, CITY OF
MULLEN, VILLAGE OF
MURRAY, VILLAGE OF
NEBRASKA CITY, CITY OF
NEHAWKA, VILLAGE OF
NELIGH, CITY OF
NELSON, CITY OF
NEMAHA COUNTY *
NEWCASTLE, VILLAGE OF
NEWMAN GROVE, CITY OF
NIOBRARA, CITY OF
NORFOLK, CITY OF
NORTH BEND, CITY OF
NORTH LOUP, VILLAGE OF
NORTH PLATTE, CITY OF
NUCKOLLS COUNTY *
O'NEILL, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
ODELL, VILLAGE OF
OGALLALA, CITY OF
OMAHA, CITY OF
ORCHARD, VILLAGE OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SARPY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
NUCKOLLS COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
GARDEN COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PERKINS COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
RED WILLOW
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MERRICK COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
KEARNEY COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
HOOKER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
NUCKOLLS COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
DIXON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
VALLEY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
NUCKOLLS COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
KEITH COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/18/85(R)
01/16/80(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/28/98(R)
05/15/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
03/04/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
05/05/98(R)
06/15/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/02/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
01/31/94(R)
10/16/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/05/90(R)
04/28/98
01/05/78(R)
09/16/82(R)
02/15/78(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/04/87(R)
04/02/92(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/20/96
09/29/86(R)
05/07/79(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/07/71(R)
09/24/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/18/85(M)
01/19/95
02/03/82
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/15/84
08/01/87(L)
06/19/97
02/09/00
01/01/87(L)
02/01/87(L)
09/27/85(M)
03/04/80
05/01/87(L)
06/15/88(M)
(NSFHA)
01/01/87(L)
08/03/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/27/85(M)
05/02/83
09/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
09/04/87(M)
09/21/98
11/05/97
(NSFHA)
09/05/90(M)
01/05/78
09/16/82
02/15/78
08/05/86(M)
09/04/87(M)
04/02/92(M)
08/04/87(M)
07/02/87(M)
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
03/18/80
08/01/87(L)
11/01/79
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
09/30/87(M)
09/17/97
(NSFHA)
Page 4 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310226#
310394A
310179#
310098
310395A
310462#
310164A
310064B
310108B
315275#
310170C
310130B
310221#
310157B
310308#
310465#
310466#
310174B
310216
310178#
310467#
310033#
310017A
310468
310067B
310311
310202#
310077#
310397#
310018B
310138#
310235A
310469#
310470B
310084A
315497#
310184#
310214A
310185B
310472#
310052
310190#
310195#
310046#
310473#
310206#
310071#
310474#
310210#
310019B
Community Name
ORD, CITY OF
ORLEANS, CITY OF
OSCEOLA,CITY OF
OSHKOSH, CITY OF
OSMOND, CITY OF
OTOE COUNTY*
OTOE, VILLAGE OF
OVERTON, VILLAGE OF
PALISADE, VILLAGE OF
PAPILLION, CITY OF
PAWNEE CITY, CITY OF
PAXTON, VILLAGE OF
FENDER, VILLAGE OF
PERU, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, VILLAGE OF
PHELPS COUNTY*
PIERCE COUNTY*
PIERCE, CITY OF
PILGER, VILLAGE OF
PLATTE CENTER, VILLAGE OF
PLATTE COUNTY *
PLATTSMOUTH, CITY OF
PLEASANTON, VILLAGE OF
POLK COUNTY *
PONCA, CITY OF
POTTER, VILLAGE OF
PRAGUE, VILLAGE OF
RALSTON, CITY OF
RANDOLPH, CITY OF
RAVENNA, CITY OF
RAYMOND, VILLAGE OF
RED CLOUD, CITY OF
RED WILLOW COUNTY *
RICHARDSON COUNTY *
RIVERTON, VILLAGE OF
ROGERS, VILLAGE OF
RULO, CITY OF
RUSHVILLE, CITY OF
SALEM, VILLAGE OF
SALINE COUNTY*
SARGENT, CITY OF
SARPY COUNTY*
SAUNDERS COUNTY *
SCHUYLER, CITY OF
SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY *
SCOTTSBLUFF, CITY OF
SCRIBNER, CITY OF
SEWARD COUNTY *
SEWARD, CITY OF
SHELTON, VILLAGE OF
County
VALLEY COUNTY
HARLAN COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
GARDEN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
HITCHCOCK COUNTY
SARPY COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
KEITH COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
NEMAHA COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
PHELPS COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
STANTON COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
DIXON COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
RED WILLOW
COUNTY
RICHARDSON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
RICHARDSON
COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
RICHARDSON
COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
SARPY COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
SEWARD COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/07/84(R)
05/01/88(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/15/85(R)
07/03/86(R)
03/02/98(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/18/72(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/01/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/01/90(R)
06/04/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/30/99
02/01/90(R)
09/01/90(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/09/99
08/01/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/29/00(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/18/85(R)
01/01/87(R)
05/01/88(R)
05/01/90(R)
03/01/01(R)
09/17/92(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/29/00
04/08/77(R)
02/04/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
12/01/78(R)
03/05/90(R)
06/18/90(R)
06/15/79(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/01/90(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/07/84(M)
05/01/88(L)
07/02/87(M)
(NSFHA)
07/03/86(M)
03/02/98
08/19/85(M)
09/27/85(M)
06/03/86(M)
12/08/81
08/01/86(L)
09/27/85(M)
02/16/83
09/01/90(L)
(NSFHA)
02/01/90(L)
06/04/87(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/21/98
02/09/00
03/01/78
09/27/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
05/15/80
08/16/88
09/04/85(M)
08/03/81
01/01/87(L)
05/01/88(L)
05/01/90(L)
03/01/01(L)
09/17/92(M)
09/29/86
04/02/76
04/08/77(M)
02/04/88
(NSFHA)
06/04/87
01/19/83
03/05/90
06/18/90
06/15/79
06/05/97
03/16/92(M)
09/30/93
09/27/85(M)
Page 5 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310317#
310039#
310150
310319#
310034#
310054#
310399
310495#
310194#
310010#
310478#
310217#
310121A
310126A
310112
310180#
3 10400 A
310065A
310160#
310144B
310045A
310188A
310166
310172B
310325A
310127#
310024#
310207#
310479
310401#
310113A
310029
310168B
310035#
310078#
310203#
310329
310133A
310204#
310404A
310222A
310483#
315496#
310079#
310037#
310140#
310484#
310231#
310232A
310036#
310048#
310205B
310189#
Community Name
SHICKLEY, VILLAGE OF
SIDNEY, CITY OF
SILVER CREEK, VILLAGE OF
SNYDER, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH BEND, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH SIOUX CITY, CITY OF
SPENCER, VILLAGE OF
SPRAGUE, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. EDWARD, CITY OF
STANTON COUNTY *
STANTON, CITY OF
STEELE CITY, VILLAGE OF
STERLING, VILLAGE OF
STRATTON, VILLAGE OF
STROMSBURG, CITY OF
STUART, VILLAGE OF
SUMNER, VILLAGE OF
SUPERIOR, CITY OF
SUTHERLAND, VILLAGE OF
SUTTON, CITY OF
SWANTON, VILLAGE OF
SYRACUSE, CITY OF
TABLE ROCK, VILLAGE OF
TAYLOR, VILLAGE OF
TECUMSEH, CITY OF
TEKAMAH, CITY OF
TERRYTOWN, VILLAGE OF
THAYER COUNTY*
TILDEN, CITY OF
TRENTON, VILLAGE OF
ULYSSES, VILLAGE OF
UNADILLA, VILLAGE OF
UNION, VILLAGE OF
VALLEY, CITY OF
VALPARAISO, VILLAGE OF
VENANGO, VILLAGE OF
VERDIGRE, VILLAGE OF
WAHOO, CITY OF
WAKEFIELD, CITY OF
WALTHILL, VILLAGE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WASHINGTON, VILLAGE OF
WATERLOO, VILLAGE OF
WAUNETA, VILLAGE OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WAYNE, CITY OF
WEBSTER COUNTY*
WEEPING WATER, CITY OF
WEST POINT, CITY OF
WESTON, VILLAGE OF
WILBER, CITY OF
County
FILLMORE COUNTY
CHEYENNE COUNTY
MERRICK COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
BO YD COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
SARPY COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
STANTON COUNTY
STANTON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
HITCHCOCK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
NUCKOLLS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
LOUP COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
SCOTTS BLUFF
COUNTY
THAYER COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HITCHCOCK COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
PERKINS COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
DIXON COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CHASE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CUMING COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
SALINE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/87(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/26/77(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/20/84(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/18/96
02/15/78(R)
02/01/90(R)
12/19/97(R)
09/18/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/01/88(R)
05/03/93
07/01/87(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/15/80(R)
03/20/96
09/04/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
10/31/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/01/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/14/90(R)
01/14/77(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/01/88(R)
12/02/80(R)
05/01/87(R)
12/01/77(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/03/85(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/87(M)
03/16/81
(NSFHA)
11/01/79
09/03/80
08/15/79
(NSFHA)
11/01/84
10/13/81
12/06/99
12/19/97
09/18/87(M)
06/01/87(L)
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
06/17/86
09/01/86(L)
09/27/85(M)
08/19/87(M)
09/27/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/19/85(M)
07/01/88(L)
09/25/79
07/01/87(L)
12/04/79
08/11/81
04/15/80
09/04/87
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
04/03/78
03/18/80
06/03/86(M)
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
01/03/86
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
02/04/81
09/14/90(M)
02/19/87
02/04/87
05/15/82
06/01/88(L)
12/02/80
05/01/87(L)
12/01/77
08/15/80
07/03/85(M)
1 1/03/82
Page 6 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
310334
310335
315498
310223A
310410#
310049B
310099A
310104#
310095#
310486#
310237#
310406#
Community Name
WILCOX, VILLAGE OF
WILSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WINNEBAGO INDIAN TRIBE
WINNEBAGO, TOWN OF
WINSLOW, VILLAGE OF
WISNER,CITY OF
WOLBACH, VILLAGE OF
WOOD RIVER, CITY OF
WYMORE,CITY OF
YORK COUNTY*
YORK, CITY OF
YUTAN, VILLAGE OF
County
KEARNEY COUNTY
FURNAS COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
CUMING COUNTY
GREELEY COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SAUNDERS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/24/84(R)
05/23/94
08/06/96
09/01/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/04/87(R)
02/01/87(R)
12/01/78(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/04/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
12/03/76
09/01/86(L)
12/04/79
06/04/87(M)
02/01/87(L)
06/03/86
07/02/87(M)
09/01/86(L)
09/29/78
11/20/91
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 317
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 293
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 49
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 132
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 24
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 12
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
310412#
310342
310006
310246
310343
310090#
310249
310026
310066
310252
310351
310416#
310254
310258#
310357
310093A
310263
310020A
310086
310269
310125B
310061A
310283
310286
310381#
310385
310085
310083
310004A
310175
310310
310489#
310316
310475#
310106
310167#
310326
Community Name
"NEBRASKA
ANTELOPE COUNTY *
ARNOLD, VILLAGE OF
ARTHUR, VILLAGE OF
ASHTON, VILLAGE OF
ATKINSON, CITY OF
BARNESTON, VILLAGE OF
BELGRADE, VILLAGE OF
BELLWOOD, VILLAGE OF
BIG SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
BLADEN, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMFIELD, CITY OF
BOX BUTTE COUNTY *
BRUNSWICK, VILLAGE OF
CEDAR RAPIDS, VILLAGE OF
CHADRON, CITY OF
CLATONIA, VILLAGE OF
CODY, VILLAGE OF
CRAIG, VILLAGE OF
CURTIS, CITY OF
DILLER, VILLAGE OF
ELK CREEK, VILLAGE OF
FARNAM, VILLAGE OF
HARDY, VILLAGE OF
HILDRETH, VILLAGE OF
HUMPHREY, VILLAGE OF
LAUREL, VILLAGE OF
MAYWOOD, VILLAGE OF
NAPONEE, VILLAGE OF
OAKDALE, VILLAGE OF
PLAINVIEW, CITY OF
POLK, VILLAGE OF
SANTEE, VILLAGE OF
SCOTIA, VILLAGE OF
SHERIDAN COUNTY *
STOCKHAM, VILLAGE OF
TALMAGE, VILLAGE OF
THEDFORD, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
ANTELOPE COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
ARTHUR COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
HOLT COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
NANCE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
DEUEL COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
BOX BUTTE COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
DAWES COUNTY
GAGE COUNTY
CHERRY COUNTY
BURT COUNTY
FRONTIER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
NUCKOLLS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
CEDAR COUNTY
FRONTIER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ANTELOPE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
GREELEY COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
OTOE COUNTY
THOMAS COUNTY
0
6
0
Hazard Area
Identified
12/27/77
08/15/75
01/10/75
07/11/75
11/05/76
04/03/85(F)
05/02/75
11/22/74
12/20/74
07/11/75
07/16/76
08/23/77
04/02/76
12/06/99(F)
09/24/76
09/18/85(F)
03/26/76
07/01/87(F)
04/02/76
08/29/75
09/04/85(F)
1 1/08/74
11/19/76
07/30/76
07/11/75
11/05/76
12/20/74
08/13/76
09/01/86(F)
07/02/76
06/27/75
08/14/79
05/02/75
1 1/22/77
12/06/74
06/01/82(F)
07/11/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
12/27/78
08/15/76
01/10/76
07/11/76
11/05/77
05/17/89(8)
05/02/76
11/22/75
12/20/75
07/11/76
07/16/77
08/23/78
04/02/77
01/10/76
09/24/77
09/18/85(8)
03/26/77
07/01/87(8)
04/02/77
08/29/76
12/05/89(8)
1 1/08/75
11/19/77
07/30/77
07/11/76
11/05/77
12/20/75
08/13/77
09/01/86(8)
07/02/77
06/27/76
08/14/80
05/02/76
1 1/22/78
12/06/75
06/01/82(8)
07/11/76
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 37
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 37
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
Page 8 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 9 of 9 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
320004#
320015#
320009#
320001#
320030#
320003#
320008#
320027#
320010#
320023#
320028#
320002#
320034#
320005#
32001 1#
320013#
325276#
320014#
320029#
320035#
320017#
320007#
320018#
320032#
320020#
320021#
320033#
320019#
320024#
320012#
320016
Communities Participating in
Community Name
"NEVADA
BOULDER CITY, CITY OF
CALIENTE, CITY OF
CARLIN, CITY OF
CARSON CITY, CITY OF
CHURCHILL COUNTY *
CLARK COUNTY *
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
ELKO COUNTY *
ELKO, CITY OF
ELY, CITY OF
EUREKA COUNTY*
FALLON, CITY OF
GABBS, CITY OF
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HUMBOLT COUNTY*
LANDER COUNTY*
LAS VEGAS, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LYON COUNTY*
MESQUITE, CITY OF
MINERAL COUNTY *
NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF
NYE COUNTY *
PERSHING COUNTY *
RENO, CITY OF
SPARKS, CITY OF
STOREY COUNTY*
WASHOE COUNTY*
WELLS, CITY OF
WINNEMUCCA, CITY OF
YERINGTON, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
the National Flood Program
County
CLARK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
ELKO COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CHURCHILL COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
ELKO COUNTY
ELKO COUNTY
WHITE PINE COUNTY
EUREKA COUNTY
CHURCHILL COUNTY
NYE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
LANDER COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
NYE COUNTY
PERSHING COUNTY
WASHOE COUNTY
WASHOE COUNTY
STOREY COUNTY
WASHOE COUNTY
ELKO COUNTY
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
LYON COUNTY
31
31
1
2
0
0
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/16/81(R)
06/01/82(R)
02/01/84(R)
03/04/86(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/29/89(R)
03/28/80(R)
02/01/84(R)
02/01/84(R)
06/15/84(R)
04/01/88(R)
01/06/99(R)
01/22/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
05/04/87(R)
04/05/83(R)
09/30/80(R)
03/01/84(R)
09/30/82(R)
09/28/90(R)
05/01/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
04/12/83(R)
06/17/91(R)
01/05/84(R)
12/01/83(R)
10/04/89(R)
08/01/84(R)
12/07/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/16/95
10/15/85
02/19/92
10/16/96
01/06/99
08/16/95
1 1/08/99
11/16/95
11/16/95
06/15/84
02/18/98
01/06/99
01/22/80(M)
08/16/95
05/02/91
09/28/90
08/16/95
02/17/88
11/20/98
08/16/95
07/19/00
08/16/95
06/08/98
06/17/91(M)
01/19/01
01/19/01
07/19/93
06/06/01
07/16/91
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Page 2 of 3 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"NEVADA
320037# WEST WENDOVER, CITY OF
320022# WHITE PINE COUNTY*
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
ELKO COUNTY
WHITE PINE COUNTY
0
0
0
Hazard Area
Identified
02/01/84(F)
09/18/87(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/11/79
09/18/88
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
"NEW HAMPSHIRE
330152B ACWORTH, TOWN OF
330174 ALBANY, TOWN OF
330103# ALLENSTOWN, TOWN OF
330020B ALSTEAD, TOWN OF
330001# ALTON, TOWN OF
330081# AMHERST, TOWN OF
330104B ANDOVER, TOWN OF
330082# ANTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF
330042B ASHLAND, TOWN OF
330176A AUBURN, TOWN OF
330177A BARNSTEAD, TOWN OF
330 178 BARRINGTON, TOWN OF
330010# BARTLETT, TOWN OF
330043# BATH, TOWN OF
330083# BEDFORD, TOWN OF
330002 BELMONT, TOWN OF
330084# BENNINGTON, TOWN OF
330029# BERLIN, CITY OF
330045B BETHLEHEM, TOWN OF
330105# BOSCAWEN, TOWN OF
330 107# BOW, TOWN OF
330 106# BRADFORD, TOWN OF
330125# BRENTWOOD, TOWN OF
330046# BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
330047# BRISTOL, TOWN OF
330 179 A BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
330180# BROOKLINE, TOWN OF
330048B CAMPTON, TOWN OF
330049# CANAAN, TOWN OF
330108# CANTERBURY, TOWN OF
330030B CARROLL, TOWN OF
330153# CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF
330182A CHESTER, TOWN OF
330183B CHESTERFIELD, TOWN OF
330154# CLAREMONT, CITY OF
33003 1# COLEBROOK, TOWN OF
330185A COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/01/01(R)
03/01/95(R)
04/02/79(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/17/88(R)
07/02/79(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
09/01/89(R)
05/01/79(R)
04/15/92(R)
04/16/79(R)
09/01/89(R)
04/18/83(R)
06/15/82(R)
04/15/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/16/79(R)
04/15/92(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/17/91(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/17/77(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/17/88(R)
05/15/79(R)
04/15/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/30/97
04/02/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
05/17/89(R)
04/02/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/18/77
03/01/95(L)
04/02/79
04/02/86(M)
05/17/88
07/02/79
04/02/86(M)
04/01/81
04/02/86(M)
04/02/86(M)
04/02/86
09/01/89(L)
03/01/84
04/15/92
05/02/94
09/01/89(L)
04/18/83
06/15/82
04/15/86(M)
07/16/79
11/20/00
04/15/92
05/04/00
06/04/96
05/18/98
05/17/77(M)
05/19/87(M)
04/02/86(M)
05/17/88
05/15/79
04/15/86(M)
05/04/00
03/01/00(L)
04/02/86
02/15/84
05/17/89
04/02/86
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
330110#
33001 1#
330155#
330198#
330111A
330199A
330127
330085#
330128#
330145#
330201
330202
330146#
330203A
330051A
330052#
330129#
330112#
330206A
330130#
330147#
330207
330086B
330053#
330113#
330013#
330131#
330004#
330021#
330087#
330032#
330157B
330158#
330209#
330210#
330088#
330055#
33021 1#
Community Name
CONCORD, CITY OF
CONWAY, TOWN OF
CORNISH, TOWN OF
DALTON, TOWN OF
DANBURY, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DEERFIELD, TOWN OF
DEERING, TOWN OF
DERRY, TOWN OF
DOVER, CITY OF
DUMMER, TOWN OF
DUNBARTON, TOWN OF
DURHAM, TOWN OF
EAST KINGSTON, TOWN OF
EASTON, TOWN OF
ENFIELD, TOWN OF
EPPING, TOWN OF
EPSOM, TOWN OF
ERROL, TOWN OF
EXETER, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON, TOWN OF
FITZWILLIAM, TOWN OF
FRANCESTOWN, TOWN OF
FRANCONIA, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FREEDOM, TOWN OF
FREMONT, TOWN OF
GILFORD, TOWN OF
GILSUM, TOWN OF
GOFFSTOWN, TOWN OF
GORHAM, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GRANTHAM, TOWN OF
GREENFIELD, TOWN OF
GREENLAND, TOWN OF
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GROTON, TOWN OF
HAMPSTEAD, TOWN OF
County
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/04/80(R)
04/16/79(R)
04/18/83(R)
12/15/86(R)
04/23/0 1(R)
04/01/94(R)
09/01/89(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/15/80(R)
03/01/95(R)
03/28/0 1(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/17/88(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/01/95(R)
05/17/82(R)
05/17/88(R)
04/01/98(R)
05/17/77(R)
05/15/91(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/01/92(R)
04/21/88(R)
06/19/89(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/02/86(R)
09/01/89(R)
05/01/80(R)
05/17/89(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/18/83(R)
06/16/93(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/23/99
04/16/79
04/18/83
12/04/85
06/14/77
04/01/94(L)
09/01/89(L)
08/01/79
04/15/81
04/15/80
03/01/95(L)
05/03/90
04/02/86
04/02/86(M)
05/17/88
04/15/82
07/03/78
06/01/95(L)
05/17/82
05/17/88
04/01/98(L)
05/17/77(M)
05/15/91
09/28/79
07/03/95
06/19/89
05/04/92
04/15/81
06/15/79
05/02/94
04/02/86(M)
07/15/92
05/01/80
05/17/89
05/19/81
04/18/83
06/16/93
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
330133#
330132#
330089#
330056#
330213
330057#
330058#
330114#
330090#
330022#
330059#
330091#
330115#
330116#
330092#
330014#
330215#
330033C
330023#
330217#
330005#
335277#
330061#
330148B
330062#
330063#
330093#
330064#
330134#
330067#
330169#
330024#
330025B
330221A
330006#
330095#
330222#
330035A
330096#
330149#
330015#
Community Name
HAMPTON FALLS, TOWN OF
HAMPTON, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HANOVER, TOWN OF
HART'S LOCATION, TOWN OF
HAVERHILL, TOWN OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
HENNIKER, TOWN OF
HILLSBOROUGH, TOWN OF
HINSDALE, TOWN OF
HOLDERNESS, TOWN OF
HOLLIS, TOWN OF
HOOKSETT, TOWN OF
HOPKINTON, TOWN OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
JACKSON, TOWN OF
JAFFREY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
KEENE, CITY OF
KINGSTON, TOWN OF
LACONIA, CITY OF
LANCASTER, TOWN OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEE, TOWN OF
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LISBON, TOWN OF
LITCHFIELD, TOWN OF
LITTLETON, TOWN OF
LONDONDERRY, TOWN OF
LYME, TOWN OF
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MARLBOROUGH, TOWN OF
MARLOW, TOWN OF
MASON, TOWN OF
MEREDITH, TOWN OF
MERRIMACK, TOWN OF
MIDDLETON, TOWN OF
MILAN, TOWN OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF
County
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/82(R)
07/03/86(R)
04/04/83(R)
07/03/78(R)
03/02/98(R)
05/03/90(R)
04/02/86(R)
03/14/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/16/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
05/17/88(R)
01/03/79(R)
07/02/79(R)
06/02/93(R)
04/15/86(R)
09/30/83(R)
09/01/88(R)
08/15/80(R)
04/13/73(R)
06/04/80(R)
04/02/86(R)
03/01/95(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
05/17/89(R)
11/05/80(R)
04/16/93(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
05/03/82(R)
04/02/86(R)
12/01/92(R)
06/03/88(R)
07/16/79(R)
08/01/88(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/29/89(R)
04/08/99
Current Effective
Map
04/15/82
07/03/86
04/04/83
07/03/78
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
07/06/98
05/01/78
06/15/79
04/15/81
06/20/01 >
04/16/79
03/12/82
05/17/88
01/03/79
07/02/79
06/02/93
04/15/86(M)
09/17/97
04/15/92
08/15/80
04/01/82
08/15/90
04/02/86(M)
04/20/00
08/19/86
07/16/79
05/17/89
11/05/80
04/16/93
02/18/81
05/03/82
04/02/86(M)
12/01/92(L)
06/03/88
07/16/79
08/01/88(L)
04/02/86(M)
05/01/80
06/03/88
07/01/00
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
330097#
330098#
330135#
330227#
330007B
330099#
330230#
330226#
330228#
330136#
330161#
330232#
330118#
330036#
330137#
330070#
330016#
330100#
330119#
330101#
330071A
330120#
330162#
330138#
330072#
330139#
330140#
330189#
330150#
330190#
330172#
330141#
330142#
330121B
330008#
330017C
330854#
Community Name
NASHUA, CITY OF
NEW BOSTON, TOWN OF
NEW CASTLE, TOWN OF
NEW DURHAM, TOWN OF
NEW HAMPTON, TOWN OF
NEW IPSWICH, TOWN OF
NEW LONDON, TOWN OF
NEWBURY, TOWN OF
NEWFIELDS, TOWN OF
NEWMARKET, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NORTH HAMPTON, TOWN OF
NORTHFIELD, TOWN OF
NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
NOTTINGHAM, TOWN OF
ORFORD, TOWN OF
OSSIPEE, TOWN OF
PELHAM, TOWN OF
PEMBROKE, TOWN OF
PETERBOROUGH, TOWN OF
PIERMONT, TOWN OF
PITTSFIELD, TOWN OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
PLAISTOW, TOWN OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
PORTSMOUTH, CITY OF
RAYMOND, TOWN OF
RINDGE, TOWN OF
ROCHESTER, CITY OF
ROLLINSFORD, TOWN OF
ROXBURY, TOWN OF
RYE, TOWN OF
SALEM, TOWN OF
SALISBURY, TOWN OF
SANBORNTON, TOWN OF
SANDWICH, TOWN OF
SEABROOK BEACH, VILLAGE OF
County
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/79(R)
05/19/81(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/02/91(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/15/91(R)
07/16/91(R)
04/02/86(R)
06/05/89(R)
05/02/91(R)
04/18/83(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
05/04/89(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/15/92(R)
06/17/91(R)
03/14/80(R)
04/02/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
04/02/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
05/03/82(R)
05/17/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/21/78(R)
09/16/82(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/15/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/17/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/79
05/21/01
08/05/86
05/02/91
04/02/86(M)
05/15/91
07/16/91
04/02/86(M)
06/05/89
05/02/91
04/17/85
06/03/86
06/15/79
05/04/89
04/02/86(M)
04/15/92
07/03/95
03/14/80
04/02/79
05/01/80
04/02/86(M)
07/03/78
04/18/83
04/15/81
05/21/01
05/17/82
04/15/92
05/21/01
09/16/82
04/02/86(M)
04/01/82
06/17/86
04/06/98
04/15/86(M)
06/15/79
09/02/93
08/05/86
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
330143#
330037A
330151#
330193#
330038B
330194A
330196B
330039#
330197#
330074B
330233A
330164#
330122B
330026#
330018#
330075B
330009#
330173A
330234#
330019#
330027#
330123#
330168#
330077A
330235#
330236#
330078#
330238A
330040#
330124A
330102#
330028#
330144#
330239#
330079#
Community Name
SEABROOK, TOWN OF
SHELBURNE, TOWN OF
SOMERSWORTH, CITY OF
SOUTH HAMPTON, TOWN OF
STARK, TOWN OF
STEWARTSTOWN, TOWN OF
STRAFFORD, TOWN OF
STRATFORD, TOWN OF
STRATHAM, TOWN OF
SUGAR HILL, TOWN OF
SULLIVAN, TOWN OF
SUNAPEE, TOWN OF
SUTTON, TOWN OF
SWANZEY, TOWN OF
TAMWORTH, TOWN OF
THORNTON, TOWN OF
TILTON, TOWN OF
TROY, TOWN OF
TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF
WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF
WALPOLE, TOWN OF
WARNER, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WATERVILLE VALLEY, TOWN OF
WEARE, TOWN OF
WEBSTER, TOWN OF
WENTWORTH, TOWN OF
WESTMORELAND, TOWN OF
WHITEFIELD, TOWN OF
WILMOT, TOWN OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
WINCHESTER, TOWN OF
WINDHAM, TOWN OF
WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF
WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
188
185
1
42
3
3
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/17/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
08/16/82(R)
06/01/89(R)
04/02/86(R)
02/12/81
04/02/86(R)
04/18/83(R)
05/17/89(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/15/91(R)
05/17/77(R)
05/05/81(R)
07/16/91(R)
04/02/86(R)
05/01/79(R)
02/21/97(R)
05/04/89(R)
06/17/91(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/04/87(R)
06/27/90(R)
04/02/86(R)
06/02/93(R)
04/15/86(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/02/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
04/15/80(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/01/80(R)
05/17/89(R)
05/15/91(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/17/86
04/02/86(M)
08/16/82
07/15/92
04/02/86
03/01/00(L)
04/02/86(M)
04/18/83
05/17/89
04/02/86(M)
04/02/86(M)
05/15/91
05/17/77(M)
05/05/81
07/16/91
04/02/86(M)
08/19/97
07/23/76
05/04/89
06/17/91
05/04/00
06/04/87
04/18/83
04/02/86(M)
06/02/93
06/02/93
04/18/83
04/02/86(M)
04/02/86(M)
04/01/86(L)
04/15/80
04/15/81
1 1/03/89
05/17/89
04/06/00
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 8 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
CID
330041#
330175#
330126A
330181A
330109#
330184
330156#
330050
330204A
330012
330208#
330054#
330212
330214A
330216#
330060#
330159
330160#
330117#
330066B
330218#
330219
330220#
330068
330224
330229
330855#
330069
330186A
330187
330188#
330073#
330191
330163#
330195A
330170#
330165A
330166B
--Not In
Community Name
"NEW HAMPSHIRE
ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF
ATKINSON, TOWN OF
CANDIA, TOWN OF
CHATHAM, TOWN OF
CHICHESTER, TOWN OF
CLARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CROYDON, TOWN OF
DORCHESTER, TOWN OF
EATON, TOWN OF
EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF
GILMANTON, TOWN OF
GRAFTON, TOWN OF
HARRISVILLE, TOWN OF
HILL, TOWN OF
KENSINGTON, TOWN OF
LANDAFF, TOWN OF
LANGDON, TOWN OF
LEMPSTER, TOWN OF
LOUDON, TOWN OF
LYMAN, TOWN OF
LYNDEBOROUGH, TOWN OF
MADBURY, TOWN OF
MADISON, TOWN OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
MONT VERNON, TOWN OF
NEWINGTON, TOWN OF
NORTHWOOD, TOWN OF
ORANGE, TOWN OF
PITTSBURG, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH, TOWN OF
RICHMOND, TOWN OF
RUMNEY, TOWN OF
SANDOWN, TOWN OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
STODDARD, TOWN OF
SURRY, TOWN OF
UNITY, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
The Program--
county
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
BELKNAP COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
MERRIMACK
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
STRAFFORD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
HILLSBOROUGH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
GRAFTON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
CHESHIRE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
06/08/98(F)
04/02/93(F)
06/28/74
01/03/75
09/01/78(F)
01/03/75
04/18/83(F)
03/14/75
01/17/75
01/17/75
01/17/75
01/17/75
01/24/75
04/02/86(F)
09/06/77
08/16/74
01/03/75
01/31/75
08/02/74
04/02/86(F)
02/21/75
01/17/75
01/17/75
11/29/74
01/17/75
02/21/75
01/02/87(F)
01/10/75
01/31/75
01/03/75
01/03/75
04/18/83(F)
01/03/75
11/08/77
01/17/75
01/03/75
05/31/74
12/27/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/28/75
01/03/76
06/28/75
01/03/76
04/05/75
01/03/76
06/20/83(8)
03/14/76
01/17/76
01/17/76
01/17/76
01/17/76
01/24/76
04/02/86(8)
09/06/78
08/16/75
01/03/76
01/31/76
08/02/75
04/02/86(8)
02/21/76
01/17/76
01/17/76
11/29/75
01/17/76
02/21/76
01/02/88
01/10/76
01/31/76
01/03/76
01/03/76
03/15/75
01/03/76
11/08/78
01/17/76
01/03/76
05/31/75
12/27/75
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 3
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 37
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 37
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340312#
34000 1#
340230#
340480#
340019#
340283#
340284#
340413#
340576A
340542#
340527#
340285#
345278#
340286#
340121B
345279#
340287#
345280#
340396#
340579
340085#
345281#
340218#
345282#
340368#
340427#
340177#
340124#
345283#
34048 1#
340020#
340459#
340369#
340125B
340126C
340428#
340429#
340554#
340086#
340482#
340178#
345284#
34023 1#
34002 1#
340335#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"NEW JERSEY
ABERDEEN, TOWNSHIP OF
ABSECON, CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLAMUCHY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLENDALE, BOROUGH OF
ALLENHURST, BOROUGH OF
ALLENTOWN, BOROUGH OF
ALLOW AY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALPHA, BOROUGH OF
ANDOVER, BOROUGH OF
ANDOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
ASBURY PARK, CITY OF
ATLANTIC CITY, CITY OF
ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, BOROUGH OF
AUDUBON, BOROUGH OF
AVALON, BOROUGH OF
AVON-BY-THE-SEA, BOROUGH OF
BARNEGAT LIGHT, BOROUGH OF
BARNEGAT, TOWNSHIP OF
FORMERLY THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION
BARRINGTON, BOROUGH OF
BASS RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BAY HEAD, BOROUGH OF
BAYONNE, CITY OF
BEACH HAVEN, BOROUGH OF
BEACHWOOD, BOROUGH OF
BEDMINISTER, TOWNSHIP OF
BELLEVILLE, TOWN OF
BELLMAWR, BOROUGH OF
BELMAR, BOROUGH OF
BELVIDERE, TOWN OF
BERGENFIELD, BOROUGH OF
BERKELEY HEIGHTS, TOWNSHIP OF
BERKELEY, TOWNSHIP OF
BERLIN, BOROUGH OF
BERLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BERNARDS, TOWNSHIP OF
BERNARDSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF
BEVERLY, CITY OF
BLAIRSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF
BLOOMINGDALE, BOROUGH OF
BLOOMSBURY, BOROUGH OF
BOGOTA, BOROUGH OF
BOONTON, TOWN OF
in the National Flood Program
County
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/85(R)
03/05/76(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/02/79(R)
03/15/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/23/77(R)
03/04/83(R)
02/04/83(R)
02/15/79(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
08/03/81(R)
10/13/78(R)
12/31/70(R)
03/15/79(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
12/15/82(R)
04/19/88(R)
04/04/83(R)
08/13/71(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
05/01/79(R)
01/05/84(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/15/80(R)
05/12/72(R)
12/18/79(R)
06/01/77(R)
03/01/78(R)
05/19/81(R)
05/13/77(R)
02/24/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/15/81(R)
12/23/77(R)
09/01/83(R)
08/15/77(R)
03/10/72(R)
12/01/81(R)
04/01/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/92
08/23/99
06/06/01
08/15/83
12/08/98
09/15/83
09/16/81
06/15/79(M)
12/23/77(M)
01/02/91
04/02/91
09/15/83
02/01/85
07/05/84
10/13/78(M)
02/02/83
07/05/83
03/23/99
06/20/00
(NSFHA)
07/15/92
09/07/00
08/15/83
03/23/99
03/02/83
01/05/84
09/04/87
02/15/80
03/01/84
12/18/79
09/20/95
01/06/99
07/15/92
05/13/77(M)
02/24/78(M)
09/01/78
05/17/84
12/15/81
02/05/92
05/02/91
09/04/87
12/04/85
12/01/81
09/20/95
04/17/85
Page 1 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340336#
340087#
340088#
340430#
340289#
34043 1#
340448B
345285#
340165#
340432#
340290#
345286#
340127#
340525#
340004B
345287#
340090#
340337#
340557#
340584
340232#
340128#
345288#
345289#
340022#
340424#
340257#
340180#
340338A
340504#
340129#
340555#
34009 1#
340092#
345290#
340198B
340130B
340398#
340233#
340505#
340023#
340131#
34029 1#
340166#
Community Name
BOONTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BORDENTOWN, CITY OF
BORDENTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
BOUND BROOK, BOROUGH OF
BRADLEY BEACH, BOROUGH OF
BRANCHBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
BRANCHVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BRICK, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGETON, CITY OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIELLE, BOROUGH OF
BRIGANTINE, CITY OF
BROOKLAWN, BOROUGH OF
BUENA VISTA, TOWNSHIP OF
BUENA, BOROUGH OF
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BUTLER, BOROUGH OF
BYRAM, TOWNSHIP OF
CALDWELL, BOROUGH OF
CALIFON, BOROUGH OF
CAMDEN, CITY OF
CAPE MAY CITY, CITY OF
CAPE MAY POINT, BOROUGH OF
CARLSTADT, BOROUGH OF
CARNEYS POINT, TOWNSHIP OF
FORMERLY THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER PENNS NECK
CARTERET, BOROUGH OF
CEDAR GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
CHATHAM, BOROUGH OF
CHATHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRY HILL, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
CINNAMINSON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARK, TOWNSHIP OF
CLAYTON, BOROUGH OF
CLEMENTON, BOROUGH OF
CLIFTON, CITY OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLOSTER, BOROUGH OF
COLLINGSWOOD, BOROUGH OF
COLTS NECK, TOWNSHIP OF
COMMERCIAL, TOWNSHIP OF
County
MORRIS COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/78(R)
02/17/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/15/83(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/11/83(R)
08/04/72(R)
01/18/84(R)
12/01/78(R)
04/02/79(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
09/14/79(R)
06/22/79(R)
03/04/83(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
02/17/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
01/05/84(R)
04/04/00
08/03/81(R)
12/01/81(R)
02/26/7 1(R)
12/31/70(R)
08/31/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
11/15/78(R)
02/01/80(R)
02/14/76(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/15/78(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/21/83(R)
05/15/78(R)
1 2/23/7 1(R)
03/11/83(R)
10/21/83(R)
06/15/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
03/01/84(R)
04/18/83(R)
07/17/78(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/17/85
12/15/89
02/02/90
07/04/88
06/15/83
06/01/78
03/11/83(M)
08/03/98
01/18/84
06/05/97
09/30/83
07/15/92
09/14/79
06/22/79(M)
03/04/83(M)
01/02/87
12/15/89
10/15/85
01/05/84
08/03/81
12/01/81
04/16/93
12/05/95
09/20/95
06/01/82
04/15/92
02/01/80
02/14/76
05/15/80
01/02/92
04/01/82
01/21/83(M)
11/20/91
09/02/82
03/11/83(M)
10/21/83(M)
06/15/82
12/05/96
03/01/84
09/20/95
03/19/82
04/15/82
12/01/82
Page 2 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340005#
340258#
345291#
340024#
340292#
340553#
340093#
340506#
340094#
340025#
340552#
345292#
340199#
345293#
340340#
340167B
340026#
340259#
340372#
340498#
340260#
340200#
340341#
340219#
340181#
340028#
340244#
340095#
340293#
340096#
340029#
34026 1#
340006#
340007#
345523#
34020 IB
340414B
340500#
340415#
340030#
34003 1#
340294#
340575#
340573#
340097#
Community Name
CORBIN CITY, CITY OF
CRANBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
CRANFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CRESSKILL, BOROUGHS OF
DEAL, BOROUGH OF
DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
DELANCO, TOWNSHIP OF
DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
DELRAN, TOWNSHIP OF
DEMAREST, BOROUGH OF
DENNIS, TOWNSHIP OF
DENVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
DEPTFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
DOVER,TOWN OF
DOWNE, TOWNSHIP OF
DUMONT, BOROUGHS OF
DUNELLEN, BOROUGHS OF
EAGLESWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST AMWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST HANOVER, CITY OF
EAST NEWARK, BOROUGH OF
EAST ORANGE, CITY OF
EAST RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF
EAST WINDSOR, TOWNSHIP OF
EASTAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
EATONTOWN, BOROUGH OF
EDGEWATER PARK, TOWNSHIP OF
EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF
EDISON, TOWNSHIP OF
EGG HARBOR, CITY OF
EGG HARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF
ELIZABETH, CITY OF
ELK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELMER, BOROUGH OF
ELMWOOD PARK, BOROUGH OF
ELSINBORO, TOWNSHIP OF
EMERSON, BOROUGH OF
ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF
ENGLISHTOWN, BOROUGH OF
ESSEX FELLS, BOROUGH OF
ESTELL MANOR, CITY OF
EVESHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
County
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/8 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/05/76(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/20/82(R)
05/02/77(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/17/82(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
11/17/82(R)
03/24/72(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/15/77(R)
04/01/77(R)
02/16/83(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
01/06/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/16/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
02/02/77(R)
12/16/80(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
04/01/83(R)
08/16/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
02/16/83(R)
05/07/71(R)
10/21/83(R)
04/08/83(R)
11/15/79(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/19/86(R)
03/1 5/8 1(R)
01/02/80(R)
11/03/78(R)
09/01/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/81
05/17/82
02/16/83
09/25/95
01/05/84
11/04/81
09/28/79
01/20/82
12/05/95
09/20/95
07/15/92
04/17/85
11/17/82
08/05/91
07/04/89
02/15/78
09/20/95
02/04/88
02/16/83
11/04/81
05/03/90
12/01/82
06/06/01
09/30/77
02/04/88
09/20/95
03/16/83
09/14/79
09/16/81
04/15/92
09/20/95
06/19/85
08/02/82
02/16/83
11/01/85
10/21/83(M)
04/08/83(M)
09/20/95
08/02/82
09/20/95
09/20/95
03/16/81
01/02/80
11/03/78(M)
09/01/83
Page 3 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
345294#
340295#
340033#
345295#
340168#
340034#
340463
340433#
340296B
340520#
340098#
340342#
340568#
340035#
340526#
340036#
340449#
340202#
340507#
340434#
340563#
340558A
340297#
340564#
340234#
340008#
340037#
340464#
340545#
340203#
340235#
340183#
340038#
340132#
340133#
340529#
340435#
340169#
340204#
340483#
340220#
340570#
340039#
340484#
340136
340134#
340501#
Community Name
EWING, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIR HAVEN, BOROUGH OF
FAIR LAWN, BOROUGH OF
FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF
FANWOOD, BOROUGH OF
FAR HILLS, BOROUGH OF
FARMINGDALE, BOROUGH OF
FLEMINGTON, BOROUGH OF
FLORENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
FLORHAM PARK, BOROUGH OF
FOLSOM, BOROUGH OF
FORT LEE, BOROUGH OF
FRANKFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN LAKES, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FREDON, TOWNSHIP OF
FREEHOLD, TOWNSHIP OF
FRELINGHUYSEN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRENCHTOWN, BOROUGH OF
GALLOWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
GARFIELD, CITY OF
GARWOOD, BOROUGH OF
GIBBSBORO, BOROUGH OF
GLASSBORO, BOROUGH OF
GLEN GARDNER, BOROUGH OF
GLEN RIDGE BOROUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF
GLOUCESTER, CITY OF
GLOUCESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
GREEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENBROOK,TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
GUTTENBERG, TOWN OF
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION
HACKENSACK, CITY OF
HACKETTSTOWN, TOWN OF
HADDON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
HADDON, TOWNSHIP OF
HADDONFIELD, BOROUGH OF
County
MERCER COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/30/76(R)
10/16/79(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
06/15/73(R)
11/19/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
10/28/77(R)
07/03/78(R)
1 l/26/82(R)
05/15/80(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/14/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
10/28/77(R)
03/11/83(R)
08/15/84(R)
03/15/84(R)
02/03/82(R)
08/03/81(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
03/11/83(R)
04/04/83(R)
02/04/83(R)
03/16/81(R)
05/02/83(R)
04/15/80(R)
02/01/77(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/16/82(R)
05/17/82(R)
04/03/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/14/79(R)
12/01/82(R)
10/08/82(R)
03/15/77(R)
03/11/83(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/16/84(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/01/83(R)
08/26/77(R)
03/01/82(R)
04/15/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/06/01
10/16/79
12/08/98
06/03/86
08/03/92
09/20/95
(NSFHA)
07/03/78
1 l/26/82(M)
07/16/96
01/17/90
06/06/01
01/06/82
02/02/90
09/20/95
03/15/84
02/03/82
08/03/81
03/16/89
08/02/82
03/11/83(M)
04/04/83
02/04/83(M)
03/16/81
06/30/99
09/20/95
05/17/88
10/15/81
08/16/82
05/17/82
04/03/84
12/08/98
09/14/79
12/01/82
01/02/91
04/05/88
08/03/92
11/18/88
08/02/82
07/16/84
09/20/95
09/20/95
09/01/83
(NSFHA)
03/01/82
12/23/77
Page 4 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340099#
340399#
340450#
340009#
340246#
340010#
340236#
34053 1#
340343#
340344#
340528#
34045 1#
340485#
340040#
34022 1#
340205B
345296#
34004 1#
340042#
340400#
340298#
340262#
340508#
340263A
345297#
340247#
340436#
340043#
340465#
340044#
340222#
340509#
340300#
340452#
340486#
340248#
340170#
345298#
340301#
340487#
340302#
340184#
340374#
340375#
340264#
340522#
340223#
340303#
340224#
340466#
Community Name
HAINESPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
HALEDON, BOROUGH OF
HAMBURG, BOROUGH OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMMONTON, TOWN OF
HAMPTON, BOROUGH OF
HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HARDING, TOWNSHIP OF
HARDWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
HARDYSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRINGTON PARK, BOROUGH OF
HARRISON, TOWN OF
HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARVEY CEDARS, BOROUGH OF
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
HAWORTH, BOROUGH OF
HAWTHORNE, BOROUGH OF
HAZLET, TOWNSHIP OF
HELMETTA, BOROUGH OF
HIGH BRIDGE, BOROUGH OF
HIGHLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF
HIGHLANDS, BOROUGH OF
HIGHTSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
HILLSBOROUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
HILLSDALE, BOROUGH OF
HILLSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
HO-HO-KUS, BOROUGH OF
HOBOKEN, CITY OF
HOLLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HOLMDEL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPATCONG, BOROUGH OF
HOPE, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, BOROUGH OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
INTERLAKEN, BOROUGH OF
IRVINGTON, TOWN OF
ISLAND HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JAMESBURG, BOROUGH OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JERSEY CITY, CITY OF
KEANSBURG, BOROUGH OF
KEARNY, TOWN OF
KENILWORTH, BOROUGH OF
County
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/15/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
10/07/83(R)
12/01/77(R)
03/15/82(R)
01/21/83(R)
02/25/83(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
04/01/83(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/01/82(R)
10/16/84(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/03/7 1(R)
03/15/77(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/14/79(R)
06/01/77(R)
11/17/82(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/01/82(R)
04/01/83(R)
03/04/83(R)
02/15/78(R)
12/15/78(R)
06/15/73(R)
01/06/83(R)
04/08/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/16/82(R)
05/15/84(R)
07/05/83(R)
03/01/84(R)
05/16/83(R)
12/01/77(R)
03/02/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/79
03/16/81
03/15/84
03/15/77
06/18/90
01/06/82
04/01/82
02/02/90
06/06/01
03/01/84
01/21/83(M)
02/25/83(M)
06/06/01
09/20/95
09/30/77
04/01/83(M)
03/23/99
09/20/95
09/20/95
08/20/82
12/01/82
10/16/84
09/30/81
06/01/77
12/22/98
03/15/77
03/02/81
09/20/95
09/14/79
12/08/98
11/17/82
06/06/01
03/01/82
04/01/83(M)
08/19/91
04/15/79
08/18/92
06/06/01
01/06/83
04/08/83(M)
0 1/02/8 1(M)
11/14/80
05/16/83
01/03/97
05/15/84
07/05/83
03/01/84
05/16/83
12/01/77
03/02/83
Page 5 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340304#
340499#
340488#
340376A
340532#
340377#
340378#
340237#
340547B
340379#
340502#
340171#
340250#
345299#
340510#
340045#
340489#
345300#
340467#
340137#
34001 1#
340380#
34040 1#
340046#
340305#
340185#
340306#
340047#
340206#
345301#
340307#
345302#
340574#
340416#
340153#
340100#
340048#
340347#
340138B
340049#
340308#
345303#
340382#
340417#
340102#
34049 1#
340383#
340207#
Community Name
KEYPORT, BOROUGH OF
KINGWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
KNOWLTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LACEY, TOWNSHIP OF
LAFAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKEHURST, BOROUGH OF
LAKEWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
LAMBERTVILLE, CITY OF
LAUREL SPRINGS, BOROUGH OF
LAVALLETTE, BOROUGH OF
LAWNSIDE, BOROUGH OF
LAWRENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAWRENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
LEBANON, BOROUGH OF
LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
LEONIA, BOROUGH OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN PARK, BOROUGH OF
LINDEN, CITY OF
LINDENWOLD, BOROUGH OF
LINWOOD, CITY OF
LITTLE EGG HARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE FALLS, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE FERRY, BOROUGH OF
LITTLE SILVER, BOROUGH OF
LIVINGSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LOCH ARBOUR, VILLAGE OF
LODI, BOROUGH OF
LOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG BEACH, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG BRANCH, CITY OF
LONGPORT, BOROUGH OF
LOPATCONG, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER ALLOW AYS CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER, TOWNSHIP OF
LUMBERTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LYNDHURST, TOWNSHIP OF
MADISON, BOROUGH OF
MAGNOLIA, BOROUGH OF
MAHWAH, TOWNSHIP OF
MANALAPAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MANASQUAN, BOROUGH OF
MANCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
MANNINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
MANSFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
MANSFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
MANTOLOKING, BOROUGH OF
MANTUA, TOWNSHIP OF
County
MONMOUTH COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/02/79(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/01/77(R)
03/18/83(R)
12/15/82(R)
03/15/77(R)
04/01/81(R)
05/13/77(R)
06/11/71(R)
09/01/78(R)
ll/26/82(R)
12/01/77(R)
08/18/72(R)
01/05/84(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/18/83(R)
09/10/71(R)
1 l/24/76(R)
09/17/80(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/01/83(R)
08/17/81(R)
06/15/82(R)
02/01/78(R)
03/15/77(R)
03/15/79(R)
02/15/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
03/26/7 1(R)
05/05/76(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/18/83(R)
02/02/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
ll/24/78(R)
11/03/82(R)
09/15/77(R)
05/12/72(R)
05/02/83(R)
11/18/83(R)
03/18/83(R)
09/15/83(R)
09/30/77(R)
11/03/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/15/92
11/04/81
01/06/83
09/01/77
03/05/90
12/15/82
01/18/89
04/01/81
12/12/80(M)
1 1/22/99
09/01/78
08/18/92
09/04/87
02/03/82
01/05/84
09/20/95
03/04/9 1(M)
08/19/86
03/02/94
09/17/80
01/19/83
06/30/99
08/17/81
09/20/95
12/15/82
06/20/01 >
09/15/83
09/20/95
01/06/83
03/23/99
01/05/84
08/15/83
03/15/82
04/18/83
07/15/92
08/15/83
09/20/95
03/15/84
ll/24/78(M)
12/08/98
09/15/77
12/15/83
05/02/83
11/18/83(M)
05/02/91
09/15/83
12/20/00
11/03/82
Page 6 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340437#
340101#
340186#
345304#
340310#
34031 1#
340172#
340050#
340103#
340104#
34051 1#
340569
340266#
340154C
345305#
340313#
34005 1#
340239#
340187#
34043 8#
3403 14#
340268#
340173#
340556#
3403 15#
340208#
340269#
340559#
340188#
340439#
340052#
340349#
340053#
340105#
34035 1#
340350#
340352#
340541A
340140B
340106#
340107#
340353#
340468#
340517#
340209#
340316B
Community Name
MANVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MAPLE SHADE, TOWNSHIP OF
MAPLEWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
MARGATE CITY, CITY OF
MARLBORO, TOWNSHIP OF
MATAWAN, BOROUGH OF
MAURICE RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
MAYWOOD, BOROUGH OF
MEDFORD LAKES, BOROUGH OF
MEDFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
MENDHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
MERCHANTVILLE, BOROUGH OF
METUCHEN, BOROUGH OF
MIDDLE, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLESEX, BOROUGH OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF
MILFORD, BOROUGH OF
MILLBURN, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLSTONE, BOROUGH OF
MILLSTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLTOWN, BOROUGH OF
MILLVILLE, CITY OF
MINE HILL, TOWNSHIP OF
MONMOUTH BEACH, BOROUGH OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTAGUE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTCLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTVALE, BOROUGH OF
MONTVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
MOONACHIE, BOROUGH OF
MOORESTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS PLAINS, BOROUGH OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRISTOWN, TOWN OF
MOUNT ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT EPHRAIM, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT HOLLY, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT LAUREL, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT OLIVE, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNTAINSIDE, BOROUGH OF
MULLICA, TOWNSHIP OF
NATIONAL PARK, BOROUGH OF
NEPTUNE CITY, BOROUGH OF
County
SOMERSET COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/19/71(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
01/19/78(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/05/82(R)
05/26/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/16/77(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/30/77(R)
11/18/81(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/03/78(R)
01/20/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/17/82(R)
05/16/77(R)
01/20/82(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/04/83(R)
09/15/77(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/15/80(R)
03/18/83(R)
09/15/78(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/01/81(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/26/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
05/15/85(R)
02/16/77(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/11/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/15/78
12/18/79
08/15/77
10/18/83
04/09/82
09/30/81
07/15/92
09/20/95
06/01/81
08/15/83
10/02/97
(NSFHA)
12/04/79
07/15/92
03/18/86
07/15/92
12/08/98
11/18/81
01/03/97
04/03/78
01/20/82
02/04/81
06/15/82
05/03/93
07/15/92
01/20/82
02/04/98
03/04/83(M)
08/04/87
04/01/81
12/08/98
08/19/85
09/20/95
01/19/96
07/05/00
06/01/81
07/03/86
10/26/79(M)
09/01/78(M)
08/01/79
09/22/99
05/15/85
02/16/77
03/01/82
09/02/82
08/11/78(M)
Page 7 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
3403 17#
340354#
340270#
340108B
340054#
345306#
340189#
340453#
340055#
340225#
34027 1#
340190#
340402#
340109#
345307#
345308#
3400 14#
340056#
340057#
340191#
345309#
340141B
345310#
340384#
340319#
3405 18#
340320#
340454#
340265#
340059#
34041 8#
340060#
340192#
340492D
34006 1#
340110#
340062#
340063#
340355#
340403#
340356A
340404#
340210#
34044 1#
340111#
340112#
340251 A
340419#
340142#
340512#
Community Name
NEPTUNE, TOWNSHIP OF
NETCONG, BOROUGH OF
NEW BRUNSWICK, CITY OF
NEW HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF
NEW PROVIDENCE, BOROUGH OF
NEWARK, CITY OF
NEWTON, TOWN OF
NORTH ARLINGTON, BOROUGH OF
NORTH BERGEN, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH CALDWELL, BOROUGH OF
NORTH HALEDON, BOROUGH OF
NORTH HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH PLAINFIELD, CITY OF
NORTH WILDWOOD, CITY OF
NORTHFIELD, CITY OF
NORTHVALE, BOROUGH OF
NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF
NUTLEY,TOWN OF
OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF
OAKLYN, BOROUGH OF
OCEAN CITY, CITY OF
OCEAN GATE, BOROUGH OF
OCEAN, TOWNSHIP OF
OCEAN, TOWNSHIP OF
OCEANPORT, BOROUGH OF
OGDENSBURG, BOROUGH OF
OLD BRIDGE, TOWN OF
OLD TAPPAN, BOROUGH OF
OLDMANS, TOWNSHIP OF
ORADELL, BOROUGH OF
ORANGE, CITY OF
OXFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
PALISADES PARK, BOROUGH OF
PALMYRA, BOROUGH OF
PARAMUS, BOROUGHS OF
PARK RIDGE, BOROUGH OF
PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF
PASSAIC, CITY OF
PASSAIC, TOWNSHIP OF
PATERSON, CITY OF
PAULSBORO, BOROUGH OF
PEAPACK AND GLADSTONE, BOROUGH OF
PEMBERTON, BOROUGH OF
PEMBERTON, TOWNSHIP OF
PENNINGTON, BOROUGH OF
PENNS GROVE, BOROUGH OF
PENNSAUKEN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENNSVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/16/77(R)
08/02/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/11/79(R)
04/01/77(R)
1 l/23/73(R)
03/28/80(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
04/03/85(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
08/03/79(R)
08/20/71(R)
03/05/7 1(R)
1 1/02/79(R)
01/20/82(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
06/30/70(R)
1 1/03/78(R)
1 l/27/70(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/14/77(R)
01/06/83(R)
02/16/77(R)
09/05/84(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/15/77(R)
01/07/83(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/15/84(R)
03/11/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/01/84(R)
05/05/81(R)
02/19/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
10/14/77(R)
02/16/77(R)
09/02/82(R)
12/15/77(R)
1 1/05/79(R)
03/04/80(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/05/82(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/15/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/01/84
08/02/82
12/04/79
05/11/79(M)
09/20/95
05/16/94
03/28/80
04/18/83
09/20/95
09/30/82
05/01/80
04/03/85
07/02/81
08/03/79(M)
03/01/84
07/20/98
02/19/83(M)
09/20/95
09/20/95
06/18/87
09/20/95
1 1/03/78(M)
07/15/92
05/19/81
12/18/81
09/29/86
02/16/77
09/05/84
08/03/92
09/20/95
01/07/83(M)
09/20/95
06/15/84
03/11/83(M)
09/20/95
05/04/92
09/20/95
12/08/98
02/19/86
09/28/79
10/14/77
02/16/77
09/02/82
12/15/77
09/14/79
03/04/80
06/25/76(M)
07/05/82
10/16/91
12/15/82
Page 8 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
345311#
340272#
340493#
340420#
340385#
340143C
340274#
34021 1#
34042 IB
345312#
340275#
340015#
340386#
340494#
340388#
345313#
345528#
340016#
340253A
340252#
340406#
340422#
345314#
340064#
340358#
340442#
340240#
340514#
340321#
340066#
340065#
340067#
340407#
340068#
340069#
340359#
340113#
340114#
340070#
345315#
340360#
34007 1#
340443#
340322
340193#
340473#
340472#
340362#
345316#
340144#
340072#
Community Name
PEQUANNOCK, VILLAGE OF
PERTH AMBOY, CITY OF
PHILLIPSBURG, TOWN OF
PILESGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE BEACH, BOROUGH OF
PINE HILL, BOROUGH OF
PISCATAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
PITMAN, BOROUGH OF
PITTSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PLAINFIELD, CITY OF
PLAINSBORO, TOWN OF
PLEASANTVILLE, CITY OF
PLUMSTED, TOWNSHIP OF
POHATCONG, TOWNSHIP OF
POINT PLEASANT BEACH, BOROUGH OF
POINT PLEASANT, BOROUGH OF
POMPTON LAKES, BORO OF
PORT REPUBLIC, CITY OF
PRINCETON, BOROUGH OF
PRINCETON, TOWNSHIP OF
PROSPECT PARK, BOROUGH OF
QUINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
RAHWAY, CITY OF
RAMSEY, BOROUGH OF
RANDOLPH, TOWNSHIP OF
RARITAN, BOROUGH OF
RARITAN, TOWNSHIP OF
READINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
RED BANK, BOROUGH OF
RIDGEFIELD PARK, VILLAGE OF
RIDGEFIELD, BOROUGH OF
RIDGEWOOD, VILLAGE OF
RINGWOOD, BOROUGH OF
RIVER EDGE, BOROUGH OF
RIVER VALE, TOWNSHIP OF
RIVERDALE, BOROUGH OF
RIVERSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
RIVERTON, BOROUGH OF
ROCHELLE PARK, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKAWAY, BOROUGH OF
ROCKAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKLEIGH, BOROUGH OF
ROCKY HILL, BOROUGH OF
ROOSEVELT, BOROUGH OF
ROSELAND, BOROUGH OF
ROSELLE PARK, BOROUGH OF
ROSELLE, BOROUGH OF
ROXBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
RUMSON, BOROUGH OF
RUNNEMEDE, BOROUGH OF
RUTHERFORD, BOROUGH OF
County
MORRIS COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/21/71(R)
12/18/79(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/21/83(R)
08/11/78(R)
02/24/78(R)
01/18/84(R)
04/01/83(R)
11/18/83(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
06/19/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/07/72(R)
09/04/70(R)
07/05/83(R)
05/20/77(R)
12/04/84(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/15/83(R)
12/17/71(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/18/79(R)
12/15/81(R)
11/15/85(R)
02/15/85(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/15/82(R)
03/15/77(R)
12/15/83(R)
02/03/82(R)
02/01/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/02/79(R)
04/15/77(R)
03/28/80(R)
09/03/7 1(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/17/82(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/21/73(R)
01/02/80(R)
06/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/17/92
05/01/84
01/16/81
10/21/83(M)
1 1/06/8 1(M)
02/24/78(M)
01/18/84
04/01/83(M)
11/18/83(M)
07/16/97
06/19/85
01/19/83
03/02/82
09/30/81
06/02/99
06/13/80
09/18/87
07/15/92
05/20/77(M)
12/04/84
04/03/78
04/15/83(M)
08/02/82
12/08/98
06/18/87
12/15/81
11/15/85
02/15/85
05/19/81
09/20/95
09/20/95
12/08/98
02/03/82
09/20/95
09/20/95
10/15/85
07/02/79
08/19/91
09/20/95
06/19/85
09/18/86
09/20/95
08/21/81
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
11/05/97
07/17/78
12/15/82
07/15/92
01/02/80
09/20/95
Page 9 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340074#
340073#
340423#
340455#
340276#
340474#
345317#
340325#
345318#
340389#
345319#
340226B
340534#
345320#
340326#
340145#
3400 17#
340444#
340277#
340328#
340445#
340278#
340515#
340194#
340279#
340280#
340392#
340115#
340535#
340282#
340330#
340329#
340116#
345321#
340393#
340456#
340560#
345322
345323#
340174#
340146#
340476#
345324#
340457#
340519#
340533#
340075#
340076#
340537#
Community Name
SADDLE BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF
SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SANDYSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SAYREVILLE, BOROUGHS OF
SCOTCH PLAINS, TOWNSHIP OF
SEA BRIGHT, BOROUGH OF
SEA GIRT, BOROUGH OF
SEA ISLE CITY, CITY OF
SEASIDE HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
SEASIDE PARK, BOROUGH OF
SECAUCUS, TOWN OF
SHAMONG, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIP BOTTOM, BOROUGH OF
SHREWSBURY, BOROUGH OF
SOMERDALE, BOROUGH OF
SOMERS POINT, CITY OF
SOMERVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH AMBOY, CITY OF
SOUTH BELMAR, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH BOUND BROOK, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH HACKENSACK, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH ORANGE, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH PLAINFIELD, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH RIVER, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH TOMS RIVER, BOROUGH OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SPARTA, TOWNSHIP OF
SPOTSWOOD, BOROUGH OF
SPRING LAKE HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
SPRING LAKE, BOROUGH OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
STAFFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
STANHOPE, BOROUGH OF
STILL WATER, TOWNSHIP OF
STOCKTON, BOROUGH OF
STONE HARBOR, BOROUGH OF
STOW CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
STRATFORD, BOROUGH OF
SUMMIT, CITY OF
SURF CITY, BOROUGH OF
SUSSEX, BOROUGH OF
SWEDESBORO, BOROUGH OF
TABERNACLE, TOWNSHIP OF
TEANECK, TOWNSHIP OF
TENAFLY, BOROUGH OF
TETERBORO, BOROUGH OF
County
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/82(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/02/82(R)
12/17/91(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/30/77(R)
1 0/08/7 1(R)
03/05/76(R)
12/31/70(R)
07/16/79(R)
08/13/71(R)
03/25/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/01/79(R)
11/17/82(R)
01/06/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
ll/28/80(R)
09/30/82(R)
12/18/85(R)
03/02/83(R)
07/18/77(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
01/06/83(R)
03/04/80(R)
10/16/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
12/15/81(R)
02/17/82(R)
01/28/83(R)
10/01/71(R)
09/14/79(R)
11/17/82(R)
02/25/83(R)
06/16/72(R)
12/31/70(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
02/02/77(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
02/02/83(R)
07/05/82(R)
10/30/00(R)
10/16/84(R)
02/17/82(R)
08/27/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/20/95
12/08/98
08/02/82
12/17/91
01/16/87
01/19/01
07/15/92
01/05/84
01/06/83
12/15/83
01/05/84
03/25/83(M)
06/15/79(M)
03/23/99
08/01/79
02/01/79
11/17/82
01/06/83
09/04/86
11/02/95
09/30/82
12/18/85
09/20/95
07/18/77
08/01/80
09/18/86
01/06/83
03/04/80
10/16/84
02/16/90
12/15/81
03/01/84
01/28/83(M)
08/02/82
05/21/01
11/17/82
03/05/90
06/06/01
07/15/92
01/20/93
09/17/80
02/02/77
03/23/99
02/02/83
07/05/82
04/15/92
09/20/95
09/20/95
Page 10 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340516#
3403 18#
340408#
345325#
340395#
34033 1#
340242#
340477#
340175B
340332#
340425#
340077#
340159#
345326#
340561#
340195#
340176#
340538#
340078#
340333#
340079#
340458#
340409#
340562#
340446#
340495#
340080#
340117#
340213#
340255#
340363#
340496#
340447#
340147#
345327#
340228#
340503B
340243#
340196#
340160#
3402 14#
340334#
34041 1#
340229#
340197#
340412#
345328B
340256#
Community Name
TEWKSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
TINTON FALLS, BOROUGH OF
TOTOWA, BOROUGH OF
TRENTON, CITY OF
TUCKERTON, BOROUGH OF
UNION BEACH, BOROUGH OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER FREEHOLD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER PITTSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER SADDLE RIVER, BOROUGH OF
UPPER, TOWNSHIP OF
VENTNOR, CITY OF
VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF
VERONA, BOROUGH OF
VINELAND, CITY OF
VOORHEES, TOWNSHIP OF
WALDWICK, BOROUGH OF
WALL, TOWNSHIP OF
WALLINGTON, BOROUGH OF
WALPACK, TOWNSHIP OF
WANAQUE, BOROUGH OF
WANTAGE, TOWNSHIP OF
WARREN, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, BOROUGH OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WATCHUNG, BOROUGH OF
WATERFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WEEHAWKEN, TOWNSHIP OF
WENONAH, BOROUGH OF
WEST AMWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CALDWELL, BOROUGH OF
WEST CAPE MAY, BOROUGH OF
WEST DEPTFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST LONG BRANCH, BOROUGH OF
WEST MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST NEW YORK, TOWN OF
WEST ORANGE, TOWN OF
WEST PATERSON, BOROUGH OF
WEST WILDWOOD, BOROUGH OF
WEST WINDSOR, TOWNSHIP OF
County
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
OCEAN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
HUNTERDON
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
MONMOUTH COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
HUDSON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
PASSAIC COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
1 2/03/7 1(R)
05/02/83(R)
05/15/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
03/25/83(R)
10/02/79(R)
01/21/83(R)
09/15/77(R)
12/10/76(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
02/15/84(R)
02/15/80(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/01/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/16/77(R)
06/04/80(R)
03/18/83(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/15/84(R)
01/05/78(R)
08/16/82(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/15/81(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/02/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/29/83(R)
02/16/72(R)
05/01/84(R)
05/11/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/16/79(R)
02/16/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/01/84(R)
05/02/77(R)
12/15/81(R)
12/31/70(R)
05/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/82
04/15/82
08/05/85
02/02/90
05/02/83
07/15/92
04/15/82
08/01/78
03/25/83(M)
12/11/81(M)
01/21/83(M)
12/08/98
07/15/92
09/15/83
02/15/84
02/15/80
07/05/82
09/01/78
12/08/98
02/16/77
09/20/95
03/18/83(M)
08/15/89
02/15/84
01/05/78
08/16/82
11/19/80
12/15/81
11/17/82
09/29/79
06/05/85
09/02/82
12/04/79
04/29/83(M)
11/18/88
05/01/84
05/11/79(M)
04/01/81
04/16/79
07/15/92
06/01/82
01/16/81
02/02/89
05/01/84
12/12/80
12/15/81
10/17/75
05/01/84
Page 11 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
340118#
340478#
340215#
340081#
340536#
340364#
340497#
345330#
345329#
340119#
340148#
340083#
340164B
345331#
340550A
340216B
340082#
340551#
340149#
340426B
3402 17#
340120B
340084#
Community Name
WESTAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WESTFIELD, TOWN OF
WESTVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WESTWOOD, BOROUGH OF
WEYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
WHARTON, BROUGH OF
WHITE, TOWNSHIP OF
WILDWOOD CREST, BOROUGH OF
WILDWOOD, CITY OF
WILLINGBORO, TOWNSHIP OF
WINSLOW, TOWNSHIP OF
WOOD-RIDGE, BOROUGH OF
WOODBINE, BOROUGH OF
WOODBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODBURY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
WOODBURY, CITY OF
WOODCLIFF LAKE, BOROUGH OF
WOODLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODLYNNE, BOROUGH OF
WOODSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
WOOLWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
WRIGHTSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
WYCKOFF, TOWNSHIP OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
ATLANTIC COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
CAPE MAY COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
SALEM COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
BERGEN COUNTY
546
545
5
60
1
0
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/80(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/10/79(R)
02/19/87(R)
05/15/84(R)
02/26/7 1(R)
12/31/70(R)
07/02/79(R)
01/20/82(R)
08/11/78(R)
05/18/79(R)
06/02/72(R)
05/18/79(R)
05/11/79(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
01/20/82(R)
12/01/81(R)
05/11/79(R)
09/02/82(R)
05/11/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/15/80
12/18/79
05/01/80
09/20/95
08/10/79(M)
02/19/87
05/15/84
01/06/83
01/06/83
07/02/79
01/20/82
09/20/95
05/18/79(M)
09/01/83
05/18/79(M)
05/11/79(M)
12/08/98
01/20/82
12/01/81
05/11/79(M)
09/02/82
05/11/79(M)
12/08/98
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 12 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"NEW JERSEY
340543# FIELDSBORO, BOROUGH OF
340540# MENDHAM, BOROUGH OF
340549# NEWFIELD, BOROUGH OF
340212# SOUTH HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
BURLINGTON
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
0
1
0
4
4
Hazard Area
Identified
06/15/81(F)
11/04/92(F)
06/17/91(F)
12/17/91(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/15/81(8)
01/31/76
07/01/78
06/28/75
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 13 of 13
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
350045#
350002#
350016#
350065#
350019
350088#
350001#
350056#
350066B
350142#
350017#
350050#
350125#
350145#
350007A
350084#
350010#
350126#
350094#
350038#
350012#
350052B
350082#
350028B
350067#
350011#
350042#
350121#
350090#
350013#
350025
350029#
350030A
350096#
355332#
350068#
350105
350026#
350035#
350144#
350123#
350031B
350139#
Communities Participating
Community Name
**NEW MEXICO
ALAMOGORDO, CITY OF
ALBUQUERQUE, CITY OF
ARTESIA, CITY OF
AZTEC, CITY OF
BAYARD, CITY OF
BELEN, CITY OF
BERNALILLO COUNTY *
BERNALILLO, TOWN OF
BLOOMFIELD, CITY OF
BOSQUE FARMS, CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CITY OF
CHAMA, VILLAGE OF
CHAVES COUNTY *
CIBOLA COUNTY*
CIMARRON, VILLAGE OF
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
CLOVIS, CITY OF
COLFAX COUNTY*
CORRALES, VILLAGE OF
DEMING, CITY OF
DONA ANA COUNTY *
ESPANOLA, CITY OF
ESTANCIA, TOWN OF
EUNICE, CITY OF
FARMINGTON, CITY OF
FORT SUMNER, VILLAGE OF
GALLUP, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY*
GRANTS, CITY OF
HATCH, VILLAGE OF
HIDALGO COUNTY
HOBBS, CITY OF
JAL, CITY OF
JEMEZ SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
LAS CRUCES, CITY OF
LAS VEGAS, CITY OF
LOGAN, VILLAGE OF
LORDSBURG, CITY OF
LOS ALAMOS COUNTY
Includes the City of Los Alamos and the City of White Rock.
LOS LUNAS, VILLAGE OF
LOS RANCHOS, VILLAGE OF
LOVINGTON, CITY OF
LUNA COUNTY *
in the National Flood Program
County
OTERO COUNTY
BERNALILLO
COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
BERNALILLO
COUNTY
SANDOVAL COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY
CHAVES COUNTY
CIBOLA COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
BERNALILLO
COUNTY
SANDOVAL COUNTY
LUNA COUNTY
DONA ANA COUNTY
SANTA FE COUNTY
TORRANCE COUNTY
LEA COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
DE BACA COUNTY
MCKINLEY COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
CIBOLA COUNTY
DONA ANA COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
LEA COUNTY
LEA COUNTY
SANDOVAL COUNTY
DONA ANA COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
QUAY COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
LOS ALAMOS
COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
BERNALILLO
COUNTY
LEA COUNTY
LUNA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/02/83(R)
10/14/83(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
07/15/88(R)
07/01/88(R)
09/16/82(R)
09/15/83(R)
01/06/83(R)
08/08/78(R)
02/15/85(R)
03/15/78(R)
08/05/97(R)
02/02/83(R)
09/15/00
07/01/87(R)
11/13/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/30/87(R)
01/06/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
02/19/86(R)
07/16/90(R)
08/22/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
04/01/92(R)
07/05/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
12/19/89
07/16/91(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/03/86(R)
06/11/71(R)
09/18/86(R)
06/26/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
10/13/87(R)
01/03/83(R)
11/01/89(R)
09/14/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/02/90
09/20/96
03/09/99
07/15/88
07/01/88(L)
04/03/85
09/20/96
07/16/96
08/08/78(M)
02/09/00
04/03/96
08/05/97
02/02/83
07/02/84
07/01/87(L)
11/13/79(M)
08/23/99
09/30/87(M)
07/16/96
(NSFHA)
09/06/92
02/19/86(M)
07/16/90
08/22/78(M)
12/29/81
02/04/81
12/16/88
04/01/92(L)
07/05/82
09/25/95
07/16/91
08/19/85(M)
07/16/96
09/25/95
09/18/86
(NSFHA)
09/01/78
09/01/87(L)
04/06/00
09/20/96
11/01/89(L)
09/14/90
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
350113#
350093#
350043#
350083#
350044#
350054#
350008#
350079A
350049#
350146#
350006#
350034#
350033#
350047#
350132#
350055#
350069#
350070#
350071#
350022#
350077#
350009B
350078#
350080#
350032
350135#
350133#
350073#
350048#
350086#
350074#
350143#
Community Name
MESILLA, TOWN OF
MILAN, VILLAGE OF
MORA COUNTY*
MORIARTY, CITY OF
OTERO COUNTY*
PORTALES, CITY OF
RATON, CITY OF
RED RIVER, TOWN OF
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY*
RIO RANCHO, CITY OF
ROSWELL, CITY OF
RUIDOSO DOWNS, VILLAGE OF
RUIDOSO, VILLAGE OF
SAN JON, VILLAGE OF
SAN MIGUEL COUNTY*
SANDOVAL COUNTY*
SANTA FE COUNTY *
SANTA FE, CITY OF
SIERRA COUNTY*
SILVER CITY, TOWN OF
SOCORRO, CITY OF
SPRINGER, TOWN OF
TAOS COUNTY *
TAOS,TOWN OF
TATUM, TOWN OF
TIJERAS, VILLAGE OF
TORRANCE COUNTY *
TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES, CITY OF
TUCUMCARI, CITY OF
VALENCIA COUNTY *
WILLIAMSBURG, VILLAGE OF
ZUNI, PUEBLO OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
DONA ANA COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
MORA COUNTY
TORRANCE COUNTY
OTERO COUNTY
ROOSEVELT COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
TAOS COUNTY
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY
SANDOVAL COUNTY
CHAVES COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
QUAY COUNTY
SAN MIGUEL
COUNTY
SANDOVAL COUNTY
SANTA FE COUNTY
SANTA FE COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
SOCORRO COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
TAOS COUNTY
TAOS COUNTY
LEA COUNTY
BERNALILLO
COUNTY
TORRANCE COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
QUAY COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
SIERRA COUNTY
MCKINLEY COUNTY
VALENCIA COUNTY
75
72
2
16
3
2
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/28/85(R)
07/05/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/87(R)
01/20/82(R)
03/01/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
01/05/89(R)
04/15/92(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/02/83(R)
06/18/80(R)
10/01/95(R)
06/30/98(R)
11/04/88(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/03/86(R)
05/17/88(R)
05/17/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/05/89(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/01/88(R)
01/06/83(R)
03/16/92
01/03/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
07/02/9 1(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/04/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/06/95
07/05/82
08/10/87(L)
09/30/88
08/10/87(L)
06/06/01
05/07/01
06/06/01
08/05/97
07/16/96
07/19/82
07/05/82
03/15/94
06/18/80
10/01/95(L)
07/16/96
11/04/88
04/02/93
07/16/96
07/17/97
05/17/88
09/04/85(M)
01/05/89
12/15/89
07/01/88(L)
09/20/96
04/11/78
07/16/96
08/15/78
02/09/00
07/16/96
09/04/87
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 2 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
350098
350110
350020A
350127#
350112A
350140#
350120#
350122#
350114
350076A
350106
350039#
350116
350141#
350108
350064#
350024#
350147#
Community Name
"NEW MEXICO
CAPITAN, VILLAGE OF
CARRIZOZO, TOWN OF
CENTRAL, VILLAGE OF
CURRY COUNTY *
DEXTER, TOWN OF
EAGLE NEST, VILLAGE OF
EDDY COUNTY*
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LOVING, VILLAGE OF
MAGDALENA, VILLAGE OF
MAXWELL, VILLAGE OF
MCKINLEY COUNTY
QUESTA, VILLAGE OF
RESERVE, VILLAGE OF
ROY, VILLAGE OF
SAN JUAN COUNTY *
SANTA ROSA, CITY OF
SUNLAND PARK, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
CRAVES COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
SOCORRO COUNTY
COLFAX COUNTY
MCKINLEY COUNTY
TAOS COUNTY
CATRON COUNTY
HARDING COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
DONA ANA COUNTY
1
2
1
Hazard Area
Identified
06/25/76
08/22/75
07/01/87(F)
02/07/78
05/02/75
12/18/79
02/06/9 1(F)
03/28/78
08/08/75
08/02/74
09/19/75
07/04/78
01/17/75
08/14/79
07/16/76
08/04/88(F)
03/02/8 1(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/25/77
08/22/76
07/01/87(8)
02/07/79
05/02/76
12/18/80
01/18/89(8)
03/28/79
08/08/76
08/02/75
09/19/76
07/04/79
01/17/76
08/14/80
07/16/77
04/22/88(W)
03/02/81(8)
09/27/92
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 17
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 17
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360324C
360325C
36076 1#
360762#
361084#
360979#
361553#
361067C
360001#
361252#
361577B
360641B
360225#
360224#
361496#
360277#
360327#
360326C
360019B
360018#
360061#
360967#
361361#
360980C
360968#
360021#
361162
360002#
360646B
361379A
361332#
360226#
361093#
360788#
360440#
360441
361312A
360188C
360189
361094#
360022#
361095#
360023#
360982B
360516#
Communities
Community Name
"NEW YORK
ADAMS, TOWN OF
ADAMS, VILLAGE OF
ADDISON, TOWN OF
ADDISON, VILLAGE OF
AFTON, TOWN OF
AFTON, VILLAGE OF
AKRON, VILLAGE OF
ALABAMA, TOWN OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALBION, TOWN OF
ALBION, TOWN OF
ALBION, VILLAGE OF
ALDEN, TOWN OF
ALDEN, VILLAGE OF
ALEXANDER, VILLAGE OF
ALEXANDER,TOWN OF
ALEXANDRIA BAY, VILLAGE OF
ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF
ALFRED, TOWN OF
ALFRED, VILLAGE OF
ALLEGANY, TOWN OF
ALLEGANY, VILLAGE OF
ALLEN, TOWN OF
ALMA, TOWN OF
ALMOND, TOWN OF
ALMOND, VILLAGE OF
ALTAMONT, TOWN OF
ALTAMONT, VILLAGE OF
ALTMAR, VILLAGE OF
ALTONA, TOWN OF
AMENIA, TOWN OF
AMHERST, TOWN OF
AMITY, TOWN OF
AMITYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
AMSTERDAM, CITY OF
AMSTERDAM, TOWN OF
ANCRAM, TOWN OF
ANDES, TOWN OF
ANDES, VILLAGE OF
ANDOVER, TOWN OF
ANDOVER, VILLAGE OF
ANGELICA, TOWN OF
ANGELICA, VILLAGE OF
ANGOLA, VILLAGE OF
ANNSVILLE, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/05/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/18/84(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/15/81(R)
11/19/80(R)
11/18/83(R)
04/15/80(R)
08/08/80(R)
04/15/86(R)
11/30/79(R)
06/01/81(R)
01/06/84(R)
01/20/84(R)
11/18/83(R)
04/03/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
10/07/83(R)
02/15/80(R)
11/15/78(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/16/82(R)
10/07/83(R)
03/04/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
03/25/85(R)
08/15/83(R)
02/05/86(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/18/84(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/01/77(R)
07/16/84(R)
12/01/87(R)
06/05/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
04/01/86(R)
10/07/83(R)
04/02/79(R)
12/31/82(R)
02/01/84(R)
05/18/79(R)
04/05/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/05/85(M)
06/19/85(M)
12/18/84
06/15/81
09/30/92
09/30/92
11/19/80
11/18/83(M)
04/15/80
08/08/80(M)
04/15/86(M)
11/30/79(M)
02/06/91
01/06/84(M)
05/04/87
05/04/87
04/03/78
10/15/85(M)
10/07/83(M)
02/15/80
11/15/78
12/17/91
07/16/82(M)
10/07/83(M)
03/04/80
02/15/80
(NSFHA)
08/15/83
02/05/86(M)
02/01/85(M)
11/15/89
10/16/92
12/18/84
05/04/98
06/19/85
12/01/87(L)
06/05/85(M)
05/01/85(M)
04/01/86(L)
03/02/98
04/02/79
12/31/82(M)
02/01/84
12/03/82(M)
04/05/88
Page Iof33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361560B
361554
360939#
361555#
360972#
360902#
361222#
361559A
361402
360763#
361105B
365333#
360062B
360147#
360284#
361117#
360285#
360940#
360985#
360102#
360517B
360103C
360227#
360101#
360165B
361385A
360518B
360764#
360765#
360380#
360379#
36079 1#
360790#
361085#
360158#
361054B
360569#
360710#
36071 1#
360268
360037#
360498#
361569#
361253#
360953C
360832#
360279#
360278#
360766#
360767#
Community Name
ANTWERP, TOWN OF
ANTWERP, VILLAGE OF
ARCADE, TOWN OF
ARCADE, VILLAGE OF
ARCADIA, TOWN OF
ARDSLEY, VILLAGE OF
ARGYLE, TOWN OF
ARGYLE, VILLAGE OF
ARIETTA, TOWN OF
ARKPORT, VILLAGE OF
ARKWRIGHT, TOWN OF
ASHAROKEN, VILLAGE OF
ASHFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
ASHLAND, TOWN OF
ASHLAND, TOWN OF
ATHENS, TOWN OF
ATHENS, VILLAGE OF
ATTICA, TOWN OF
ATTICA, VILLAGE OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
AUGUSTA, TOWN OF
AURELIUS, TOWN OF
AURORA, TOWN OF
AURORA, VILLAGE OF
AUSABLE, TOWN OF
AUSTERLITZ, TOWN OF
AVA, TOWN OF
AVOCA, TOWN OF
AVOCA, VILLAGE OF
AVON, TOWN OF
AVON, VILLAGE OF
BABYLON, VILLAGE OF
BABYLON,TOWN OF
BAINBRIDGE, TOWN OF
BAINBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
BALDWIN, TOWN OF
BALDWINSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BALLSTON SPA, VILLAGE OF
BALLSTON, TOWN OF
BANGOR, TOWN OF
BARKER, TOWN OF
BARKER, VILLAGE OF
BARNEVELD, VILLAGE OF
BARRE, TOWN OF
BARRINGTON, TOWN OF
BARTON, TOWN OF
BATAVIA, CITY OF
BATAVIA, TOWN OF
BATH, TOWN OF
BATH, VILLAGE OF
County
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CATTARAVUS
COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/86(R)
12/19/84(R)
12/23/83(R)
09/10/82(R)
11/02/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/24/79(R)
05/18/79(R)
02/14/85(R)
03/04/80(R)
04/08/83(R)
08/20/71(R)
05/25/84(R)
01/16/80(R)
04/10/81(R)
09/03/82(R)
09/06/89(R)
12/23/83(R)
10/07/83(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
05/01/85(R)
11/04/83(R)
04/16/79(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
08/15/83(R)
05/16/83(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/01/77(R)
07/16/79(R)
11/18/83(R)
10/05/84(R)
07/23/82(R)
08/16/82(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/01/84(R)
02/14/85(R)
01/06/84(R)
05/01/84(R)
04/17/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
03/09/84(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/16/82(R)
01/17/85(R)
05/02/83(R)
03/16/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/86(M)
(NSFHA)
03/03/92
03/03/92
11/02/77
09/29/78
08/24/79(M)
05/18/79(M)
(NSFHA)
03/04/80
04/08/83(M)
05/04/98
05/25/84
01/16/80
09/30/88
09/06/89
09/06/89
04/30/86
07/03/86
03/02/81
05/01/85(M)
11/04/83(M)
04/16/79
04/15/80
05/15/85(M)
06/05/85(M)
02/01/85(M)
02/05/92
05/16/83
08/15/78
08/01/78
05/04/98
05/04/98
12/03/91
06/02/93
07/23/82(M)
03/01/84
08/16/95
08/16/95
(NSFHA)
02/05/92
05/01/84
03/23/99
10/15/81(M)
03/09/84(M)
05/15/91
09/16/82
01/17/85
05/02/83
03/16/83
Page 2 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360459#
360988#
360217#
360903#
361333#
360166#
361532#
361392A
361069#
360025#
360133#
360941C
361598
360955D
361137B
361497A
361215B
360672#
360003A
361138#
360815B
361540#
360148#
360038#
360039C
361362#
361309#
361525#
361489A
361127B
361580#
361650#
360608#
361473#
361097#
360026#
360869#
360269B
360519#
360520B
360228#
360190B
361415
361207B
361393
360229B
361171A
360668#
360904#
Community Name
BAXTER ESTATES, VILLAGE OF
BAYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BEACON, CITY OF
BEDFORD, TOWN OF
BEEKMAN, TOWN OF
BEEKMANTOWN, TOWN OF
BELLE TERRE, VILLAGE OF
BELLMONT, TOWN OF
BELLPORT, VILLAGE OF
BELMONT, VILLAGE OF
BEMUS POINT, VILLAGE OF
BENNINGTON, TOWN OF
BENSON, TOWN OF
BENTON, TOWN OF
BERGEN, TOWN OF
BERGEN, VILLAGE OF
BERKSHIRE, TOWN OF
BERLIN, TOWN OF
BERNE, TOWN OF
BETHANY, TOWN OF
BETHEL, TOWN OF
BETHLEHEM, TOWN OF
BIG FLATS, TOWN OF
BINGHAMTON, CITY OF
BINGHAMTON, TOWN OF
BIRDSALL, TOWN OF
BLACK BROOK, TOWN OF
BLACK RIVER, VILLAGE OF
BLASDELL, VILLAGE OF
BLEECKER,TOWN OF
BLENHEIM, TOWN OF
BLOOMFIELD, VILLAGE OF
USE TOWN OF EAST BLOOMFIELD (CID 361298) FIRM
DATED 8/15/83 PANELS: 008B, 009B, 0015B, 0017B
BLOOMING GROVE, TOWN OF
BLOOMINGBURG, VILLAGE OF
BOLIVAR, TOWN OF
BOLIVAR, VILLAGE OF
BOLTON, TOWN OF
BOMBAY, TOWN OF
BOONVILLE, TOWN OF
BOONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BOSTON, TOWN OF
BO VINA, TOWN OF
BOYLSTON, TOWN OF
BRADFORD, TOWN OF
BRANDON, TOWN OF
BRANT, TOWN OF
BRASHER, TOWN OF
BREWSTER, VILLAGE OF
BRIARCLIFF MANOR, VILLAGE OF
County
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/16/83(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/01/84(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/05/84(R)
05/04/87(R)
03/16/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
12/23/83(R)
01/31/83(R)
01/20/84(R)
07/06/84(R)
06/08/79(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/17/79(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/27/84(R)
06/15/83(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/01/77(R)
01/06/84(R)
07/16/82(R)
08/15/83(R)
12/19/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
02/08/0 1(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
07/30/82(R)
11/01/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
02/15/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/13/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/14/85(R)
01/06/84(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/18/86(R)
02/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/02/97
04/02/97
03/01/84
12/04/79
09/05/84
05/04/87
05/04/98
08/05/85(M)
05/04/98
12/18/84
1 1/02/77
12/23/83(M)
(NSFHA)
01/20/84(M)
07/06/84(M)
06/08/79(M)
05/15/85(M)
08/17/79(M)
08/01/87(L)
09/24/84(M)
02/27/84(M)
04/17/84
08/18/92
06/01/77
01/06/84(M)
07/16/82(M)
08/15/83
06/05/89(M)
06/25/76(M)
07/18/85(M)
05/01/85(M)
11/15/85
04/17/85
07/30/82(M)
01/19/96
08/16/96
02/15/85(M)
07/03/85(M)
04/17/85(M)
09/30/81
05/01/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
(NSFHA)
01/06/84(M)
01/03/86(M)
09/18/86
02/01/78
Page 3 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360521
360522#
361163
360410#
361342#
361414A
361128B
361482A
36041 1#
360134
360905#
360392B
365334#
361431A
361063C
36 1576 A
361130#
361480A
360104#
361534A
360230#
361531
361394#
361479
361098A
361106#
361445A
361247B
361139
360286#
361411#
360381#
360816B
360499#
361223B
360883#
360523#
360993#
361208#
360570#
360571#
360768#
361313#
361297#
360442#
360443#
360597#
360598#
Community Name
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
BRIDGEWATER, VILLAGE OF
BRIGHTON, TOWN OF
BRIGHTON, TOWN OF
BRIGHTWATER, VILLAGE OF
BRISTOL, TOWN OF
BROADALBIN, TOWN OF
BROADALBIN, VILLAGE OF
BROCKPORT, VILLAGE OF
BROCTON, VILLAGE OF
BRONXVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
BROOKHAVEN,TOWN OF
BROOME, TOWN OF
BROWNVILLE, TOWN OF
BROWNVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BRUNSWICK, TOWN OF
BRUSHTON, VILLAGE OF
BRUTUS, TOWN OF
BUCHANAN, VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO, CITY OF
BURDETT, VILLAGE OF
BURKE, CITY OF
BURKE, VILLAGE OF
BURNS, TOWN OF
BUSTI, TOWN OF
BUTLER, TOWN OF
BUTTERNUTS, TOWN OF
BYRON, TOWN OF
CAIRO, TOWN OF
CALEDONIA, TOWN OF
CALEDONIA, VILLAGE OF
CALLICOON, TOWN OF
CAMBRIA, TOWN OF
CAMBRIDGE, TOWN OF
CAMBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
CAMDEN, TOWN OF
CAMDEN, VILLAGE OF
CAMERON, TOWN OF
CAMILLUS, TOWN OF
CAMILLUS, VILLAGE OF
CAMPBELL, TOWN OF
CANAAN, TOWN OF
CANADICE, TOWN OF
CANAJOHARIE, TOWN OF
CANAJOHARIE, VILLAGE OF
CANANDAIGUA, CITY OF
CANANDAIGUA, TOWN OF
County
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/19/84(R)
04/15/82(R)
03/25/85(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/02/82(R)
01/20/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
04/23/82(R)
10/29/82(R)
03/01/79(R)
04/17/85(R)
08/31/72(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/18/86(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/19/86(R)
04/16/79(R)
07/27/79(R)
11/18/81(R)
06/01/88(R)
02/19/86(R)
02/14/85(R)
07/16/82(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/09/82(R)
12/23/83(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/06/89(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/01/81(R)
03/23/84(R)
09/30/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/16/88(R)
12/18/84(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/17/80(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/15/84(R)
01/06/83(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
04/15/82
(NSFHA)
06/18/80
05/24/98
01/20/84(M)
01/03/85(M)
04/15/86(M)
04/23/82(M)
(NSFHA)
03/01/79
04/17/85(M)
05/04/98
10/15/85(M)
06/02/92
03/18/86(M)
12/06/00
02/19/86(M)
07/16/97
07/27/79(M)
08/23/99
06/01/88(L)
02/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
07/16/82(M)
01/20/93
07/09/82(M)
12/23/83(M)
02/01/88(L)
09/06/89
06/01/81
06/01/81
03/23/84(M)
09/30/83
09/04/85(M)
05/03/93
09/07/98
08/16/88
05/15/91
05/18/99
05/18/99
06/11/82
07/03/85(M)
05/15/84
01/06/83
1 1/03/82
09/24/82
03/03/97
Page 4 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360027B
360393#
360833#
360834B
360028#
360769#
360770B
361172#
360697#
361062C
361574B
361193
360642#
360669#
361129B
360843C
360994#
360063D
360995#
361053#
361243A
361563A
360673#
360359
360745B
361055B
360105#
360106B
361539#
361116#
360287#
361367A
361594
360107#
361203A
361290#
360394#
360460#
360135#
360647
36046 1#
360328#
361311#
360167B
360444B
361070B
360712#
Community Name
CANASERAGA, VILLAGE OF
CANASTOTA , VILLAGE OF
CANDOR, TOWN OF
CANDOR, VILLAGE OF
CANEADEA, TOWN OF
CANISTEO, TOWN OF
CANISTEO, VILLAGE OF
CANTON, TOWN OF
CANTON, VILLAGE OF
CAPE VINCENT, TOWN OF
CAPE VINCENT, VILLAGE OF
CARLISLE, TOWN OF
CARLTON, TOWN OF
CARMEL,TOWN OF
CAROGA, TOWN OF
CAROLINE, TOWN OF
CARROLL, TOWN OF
CARROLLTON, TOWN OF
CARTHAGE, VILLAGE OF
CASSADAGA, VILLAGE OF
CASTILE, TOWN OF
CASTILE, VILLAGE OF
CASTLETON-ON-HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
CASTORLAND, VILLAGE OF
CATHARINE, TOWN OF
CATLIN, TOWN OF
CATO, TOWN OF
CATO, VILLAGE OF
CATON, TOWN OF
CATSKILL, TOWN OF
CATSKILL, VILLAGE OF
CATTARAUGUS, VILLAGE OF
CAYUGA HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
CAYUGA, VILLAGE OF
CAYUTA, TOWN OF
CAZENOVIA, TOWN OF
CAZENOVIA, VILLAGE OF
CEDARHURST, VILLAGE OF
CELORON, VILLAGE OF
CENTRAL SQUARE, VILLAGE OF
CENTRE ISLAND, VILLAGE OF
CHAMPION, TOWN OF
CHAMPLAIN, TOWN OF
CHAMPLAIN, VILLAGE OF
CHARLESTON, TOWN OF
CHARLOTTE, TOWN OF
CHARLTON, TOWN OF
County
ALLEGANY COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/02/83(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
10/01/91(R)
08/20/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
05/18/79(R)
12/19/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
01/01/88(R)
04/17/85(R)
09/01/88(R)
11/01/78(R)
06/18/87(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
10/29/82(R)
03/18/83(R)
01/03/86(R)
12/01/77(R)
12/23/83(R)
05/28/82(R)
11/15/84(R)
09/30/76(R)
04/20/84(R)
06/22/84(R)
06/22/79(R)
08/08/80(R)
03/23/84(R)
02/16/90(R)
09/06/89(R)
04/20/84(R)
01/31/83(R)
07/05/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/01/83(R)
03/18/80(R)
1 1/20/85(R)
10/18/83(R)
07/16/82(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/05/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/23/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/02/83(M)
04/15/88
08/19/86
10/01/91(L)
08/20/82(M)
12/18/84
05/18/79(M)
08/17/98
05/02/94
06/02/92
04/17/85(M)
09/01/88(L)
11/01/78
06/18/87
07/18/85(M)
06/19/85(M)
10/29/82(M)
03/18/83(M)
06/17/91
12/01/77
12/23/83(M)
05/28/82(M)
11/15/84
(NSFHA)
04/20/84(M)
06/22/84(M)
04/15/82(M)
08/08/80(M)
03/23/84(M)
02/16/90
09/06/89
04/20/84(M)
(NSFHA)
07/05/77
09/24/84(M)
06/19/85
06/19/85
07/16/97
03/18/80
(NSFHA)
04/02/97
06/02/93
09/04/87
06/05/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
03/23/84(M)
08/16/95
Page 5 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361481
361314#
361523#
360329#
361071#
361310#
36023 1#
360149#
360040#
361107#
360136#
361269
361449B
360870#
360609A
361541#
360264#
361615#
360412#
360395#
360999#
360572#
360177B
36 1422 A
360232#
361254
360413#
360679#
361461A
360173#
360573#
360330C
36033 1#
360524#
361315#
360998#
360713#
361450A
361173B
361334#
361380
360525#
360890#
361369A
361573#
360743#
360817#
360005#
36077 1#
361556#
Community Name
CHATEAUGAY, VILLAGE OF
CHATHAM, TOWN OF
CHATHAM, VILLAGE OF
CHAUMONT, VILLAGE OF
CHAUTAUQUA, TOWN OF
CHAZY, TOWN OF
CHEEKTOWAGA, TOWN OF
CHEMUNG, TOWN OF
CHENANGO, TOWN OF
CHERRY CREEK, TOWN OF
CHERRY CREEK, VILLAGE OF
CHERRY VALLEY, TOWN OF
CHERRY VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHESTER, VILLAGE OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWN OF
CHESTNUT RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
CHILI, TOWN OF
CHITTENANGO, VILLAGE OF
CHURCHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CICERO, TOWN OF
CINCINNATUS, TOWN OF
CLARE, TOWN OF
CLARENCE, TOWN OF
CLARENDON,TOWN OF
CLARKSON, TOWN OF
CLARKSTOWN, TOWN OF
CLARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CLAVERACK, TOWN OF
CLAY, TOWN OF
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
CLAYTON, VILLAGE OF
CLAYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CLERMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
CLEVELAND, VILLAGE OF
CLIFTON PARK, TOWN OF
CLIFTON SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
CLIFTON, CITY OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
CLINTON, TOWNN OF
CLINTON, VILLAGE OF
CLYDE, VILLAGE OF
CLYMER, TOWN OF
COBLESKILL, TOWN OF
COBLESKILL, VILLAGE OF
COCHECTON, TOWN OF
COEYMANS, TOWN OF
COHOCTON, TOWN OF
COHOCTON, VILLAGE OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/14/85(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/15/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
06/15/84(R)
05/19/87(R)
07/05/77(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/17/81(R)
07/02/82(R)
08/08/78(R)
02/01/88(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/18/86(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/18/86(R)
05/04/87(R)
09/16/88(R)
02/01/79(R)
02/01/85(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/04/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/16/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/31/83(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/02/83(R)
11/12/82(R)
09/06/89(R)
04/01/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/12/84(R)
09/05/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
03/01/84(R)
07/23/82(R)
05/15/86(R)
07/05/84(R)
04/18/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
12/18/84(R)
10/07/83(R)
01/19/83(R)
02/16/83(R)
08/19/87(R)
08/03/89(R)
05/16/83(R)
05/16/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
09/15/93
12/15/82
09/08/99
06/15/84
05/19/87
03/15/84
09/03/80
08/17/81
07/02/82(M)
02/15/78
02/01/88(L)
01/03/86(M)
06/04/96
06/05/85(M)
09/18/86
05/04/87
09/16/88
02/01/79
02/01/85(M)
08/03/81
09/15/94
05/15/85(M)
07/16/82(M)
03/05/96
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
05/21/01
11/12/82(M)
09/06/89
03/16/92
04/02/86
12/01/77
07/05/83
09/05/84
06/01/82
08/16/95
07/23/82(M)
05/15/86(M)
07/05/84
(NSFHA)
05/01/85
12/18/84
10/07/83(M)
01/19/83
02/16/83
08/19/87
08/03/89
05/16/83
05/16/83
Page 6 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360006#
360191#
360298#
360064#
360670#
360233#
360041#
360234#
360007#
361423A
360299B
361086B
360235#
360382#
361606
360065#
360042#
361395
360360B
360648#
360665#
360174B
360361
361498B
360715#
360714#
360772#
360773#
360610#
36061 1#
360178#
360906#
360179#
360462#
361375A
36075 1#
360942B
361115#
360288#
361250#
361068B
360362A
360907#
361148#
361099#
360029#
361386A
360845B
361209A
360383#
360300B
Community Name
COHOES, CITY OF
COLCESTER,TOWN OF
COLD BROOK, VILLAGE OF
COLD SPRING, TOWN OF
COLD SPRING, VILLAGE OF
COLDEN, TOWN OF
COLESVILLE, TOWN OF
COLLINS,TOWN OF
COLONIE, TOWN OF
COLTON, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
COLUMBUS, TOWN OF
CONCORD, TOWN OF
CONESUS, TOWN OF
CONESVILLE, TOWN OF
CONEWANGO, TOWN OF
CONKLIN, TOWN OF
CONSTABLE, TOWN OF
CONSTABLEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CONSTANTIA, TOWN OF
COOPERSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
COPAKE, TOWN OF
COPENHAGEN, VILLAGE OF
CORFU, VILLAGE OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
CORINTH, VILLAGE OF
CORNING, CITY OF
CORNING, TOWN OF
CORNWALL ON THE HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
CORNWALL, TOWN OF
CORTLAND, CITY OF
CORTLANDT, TOWN OF
CORTLANDVILLE, TOWN OF
COVE NECK, VILLAGE OF
COVENTRY, TOWN OF
COVERT, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, TOWN OF
COXSACKIE, TOWN OF
COXSACKIE, VILLAGE OF
CRAWFORD, TOWN OF
CROGHAM, VILLAGE OF
CROGHAN, TOWN OF
CROTON-ON-HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
CROWN POINT,TOWN OF
CUBA, TOWN OF
CUBA, VILLAGE OF
CUYLER, TOWN OF
DANBY, TOWNSHIP OF
DANSVILLE, TOWN OF
DANSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
DANUBE, TOWN OF
County
ALBANY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/21/78(R)
03/15/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
01/06/83(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/05/79(R)
05/01/85(R)
07/16/82(R)
04/08/83(R)
02/27/84(R)
10/14/77(R)
01/31/83(R)
07/30/82(R)
05/16/77(R)
02/14/85(R)
07/16/82(R)
11/03/82(R)
02/01/88(R)
06/19/85(R)
07/30/84(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/01/84(R)
03/01/84(R)
12/01/77(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/17/85(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/18/83(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
12/23/83(R)
09/06/89(R)
12/02/83(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
11/02/83(R)
07/16/87(R)
07/30/82(R)
04/17/78(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
03/09/84(R)
11/01/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/04/79
02/04/87
12/20/00
03/01/78
03/15/84
07/02/79
01/20/93
05/16/77
09/05/79
05/01/85(M)
07/16/82(M)
04/08/83(M)
09/04/86
02/15/91
(NSFHA)
07/30/82(M)
07/17/81
(NSFHA)
07/16/82(M)
11/03/82
05/04/00
06/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
10/15/85(M)
08/16/95
08/16/95
02/12/82
09/27/91
08/02/82
09/30/82
08/15/83
04/17/85
08/15/83
04/02/97
10/15/85(M)
06/08/84(M)
12/23/83(M)
09/06/89
09/06/89
09/30/82
05/15/85(M)
05/15/85(M)
11/02/83
07/16/87
07/30/82(M)
04/17/78
05/15/85
05/15/85(M)
03/09/84(M)
11/01/78
07/03/85(M)
Page 7 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361140A
360192B
361188#
360066B
361174
361175A
361291#
360396B
360612#
360526#
360332
360737B
360818#
361368A
360193#
361572#
360363B
361439A
360236#
360195B
360043#
361524#
360973#
360333#
360364B
360044#
361122B
360746#
360908#
360301#
361335#
361410#
360956#
360846B
360847#
361396
361191#
360957
360137#
361108#
360289
360943B
365335#
361298#
361336#
Community Name
DARIEN, TOWN OF
DAVENPORT, TOWN OF
DAY, TOWN OF
DAYTON, TOWN OF
DE KALB, TOWN OF
DE PEYSTER, TOWN OF
DE RUYTER, TOWN OF
DE RUYTER, VILLAGE OF
DEER PARK, TOWN OF
DEERFIELD, TOWN OF
DEFERIET, VILLAGE OF
DELANSON, VILLAGE OF
DELAWARE, TOWN OF
DELEVAN, VILLAGE OF
DELHI, TOWN OF
DELHI, VILLAGE OF
DENMARK, TOWN OF
DENNING, TOWN OF
DEPEW, VILLAGE OF
DEPOSIT, TOWN OF
DEPOSIT, VILLAGE OF
DERING HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
DEWITT, TOWN OF
DEXTER, VILLAGE OF
DIANA, TOWN OF
DICKINSON, TOWN OF
DICKINSON, TOWN OF
DIX, TOWN OF
DOBBS FERRY, VILLAGE OF
DOLGEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
DOVER, TOWN OF
DRESDEN, TOWN OF
DRESDEN, VILLAGE OF
DRYDEN, TOWN OF
DRYDEN, VILLAGE OF
DUANE, TOWN OF
DUANESBURG, TOWN OF
DUNDEE, VILLAGE OF
DUNKIRK, CITY OF
DUNKIRK, TOWN OF
DURHAM, TOWN OF
EAGLE, TOWN OF
EAST AURORA, VILLAGE OF
EAST BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF
EAST FISHKILL, TOWN OF
County
GENESEE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/06/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/19/84(R)
07/23/82(R)
06/08/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/18/87(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/19/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
11/18/83(R)
01/20/84(R)
07/18/85(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/25/84(R)
08/03/81(R)
03/18/86(R)
02/01/79(R)
08/11/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/15/77(R)
03/18/86(R)
10/29/82(R)
04/16/79(R)
03/16/83(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/15/85(R)
01/03/79(R)
12/19/84(R)
02/17/89(R)
03/01/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/06/82(R)
06/01/88(R)
12/23/83(R)
07/20/73(R)
08/15/83(R)
06/15/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/06/84(M)
05/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
05/25/84(M)
(NSFHA)
07/23/82(M)
06/08/84
08/24/84(M)
10/20/99
06/02/99
(NSFHA)
05/25/84(M)
01/16/87
01/20/84(M)
07/18/85
07/18/85
05/15/85(M)
05/25/84(M)
08/03/81
03/18/86(M)
02/01/79
05/04/98
09/01/79
06/15/94
09/24/84(M)
04/15/77
03/18/86(M)
10/29/82(M)
04/16/79
03/16/83
07/04/88
09/20/96
06/15/81
05/15/85(M)
01/03/79
(NSFHA)
02/17/89
03/01/88(L)
02/04/81
08/06/82(M)
06/01/88(L)
12/23/83(M)
06/29/79
08/15/83
06/15/84
Page 8 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361133#
360794#
360795#
360067B
360068#
360414B
360463#
360574#
360909#
361224#
360398B
360238#
36 1270 A
361176B
361463B
361120B
36 1499 A
360576#
360575#
361388#
361382A
360975#
361072#
361073#
360069#
360070#
361074B
360334#
360335B
360239#
360152#
360150#
360151#
360910#
360045#
361399B
361374#
360774#
360855#
361194#
361542#
361149#
360337#
Community Name
EAST GREENBUSH, TOWN OF
EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF
EAST HAMPTON, VILLAGE OF
EAST OTTO, TOWN OF
EAST RANDOLPH, VILLAGE OF
EAST ROCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
EAST ROCKAWAY, VILLAGE OF
EAST SYRACUSE, VILLAGE OF
EASTCHESTER, TOWN OF
EASTON, TOWN OF
EATON, TOWN OF
EDEN, TOWN OF
EDMESTON, TOWN OF
EDWARDS, TOWN OF
EDWARDS, VILLAGE OF
ELBA, TOWN OF
ELBA, VILLAGE OF
ELBBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
ELBRIDGE, TOWN OF
ELIZABETHTOWN, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF ELIZABETHTOWN
ELLENBURG, TOWN OF
ELLENVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ELLERY, TOWN OF
ELLICOTT, TOWN OF
ELLICOTTVILLE, TOWN OF
ELLICOTTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ELLINGTON, TOWN OF
ELLISBURG, TOWN OF
ELLISBURG, VILLAGE OF
ELMA,TOWN OF
ELMIRA HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
ELMIRA, CITY OF
ELMIRA, TOWN OF
ELMSFORD, VILLAGE OF
ENDICOTT, VILLAGE OF
EPHRATAH, TOWN OF
ERIN, TOWN OF
ERWIN, TOWN OF
ESOPUS, TOWN OF
ESPERANCE, TOWN OF
ESPERANCE, VILLAGE OF
ESSEX, TOWN OF
EVANS MILLS, VILLAGE OF
County
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/80(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/30/80(R)
04/20/84(R)
02/01/78(R)
08/20/82(R)
12/01/78(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/15/79(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/24/79(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/30/82(R)
07/23/82(R)
10/05/84(R)
01/20/84(R)
08/16/82(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/20/84(R)
03/04/86(R)
07/05/83(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/01/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
02/01/79(R)
10/07/83(R)
08/15/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/01/77(R)
10/16/84(R)
12/04/84(R)
10/16/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/13/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/05/84(R)
03/02/83(R)
09/16/82(R)
04/03/87(R)
02/05/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/18/80
05/04/98
05/04/98
04/20/84(M)
02/01/78
08/20/82(M)
04/02/97
08/03/81
11/15/79
11/20/91
09/10/84(M)
08/24/79(M)
06/01/87(L)
07/30/82(M)
07/23/82(M)
10/05/84(M)
01/20/84(M)
08/16/82
08/16/82
01/20/93
03/04/86(M)
07/05/83
03/18/80
08/01/84
01/19/00
05/02/94
10/07/83(M)
05/18/92
06/19/85(M)
06/22/98
09/29/96
04/02/97
09/29/96
06/15/79
09/07/98
07/03/85(M)
08/13/82(M)
07/02/80
07/05/84
03/02/83
09/16/82
04/03/87
01/02/92
Page 9 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360240#
361418A
360577B
360109#
360302C
360415#
360138#
360819B
360071B
361299#
361588
360752#
360578#
360399#
360046#
361177B
361337#
360218#
360197B
360110B
360527B
360445
360613#
360528#
360446#
360820
360529B
361501B
361231#
360884
360270#
360885#
361536#
360447#
360448#
360698#
360303#
360304#
360198
361397A
360199A
360072#
Community Name
EVANS, TOWN OF
EXETER, TOWN OF
FABIUS, TOWN OF
FAIR HAVEN, VILLAGE OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FAIRPORT, VILLAGE OF
FALCONER, VILLAGE OF
FALLSBURG, TOWN OF
FARMERSVILLE, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON, TOWN OF
FARNHAM, VILLAGE OF
FAYETTE, TOWN OF
FAYETTEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FENNER, TOWNSHIP OF
FENTON, TOWN OF
FINE, TOWN OF
FISHKILL, TOWN OF
FISHKILL, VILLAGE OF
FLEISCHMANNS, VILLAGE OF
FLEMING, TOWN OF
FLORENCE, TOWN OF
FLORIDA, TOWN OF
FLORIDA, VILLAGE OF
FLOYD, TOWN OF
FONDA, VILLAGE OF
FORESTBURGH, TOWN OF
FORESTPORT, TOWN OF
FORESTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FORT ANN, TOWN OF
FORT ANN, VILLAGE OF
FORT COVINGTON, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF FT. COVINGTON
FORT EDWARD, TOWN OF
FORT EDWARD, VILLAGE OF
FORT JOHNSON, VILLAGE OF
FORT PLAIN, VILLAGE OF
FOWLER, TOWN OF
FRANKFORT, TOWN OF
FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLINVILLE, TOWN OF
County
ERIE COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
11/18/83(R)
04/30/86(R)
02/01/78(R)
07/30/82(R)
09/05/84(R)
01/05/78(R)
03/09/84(R)
07/23/82(R)
09/30/83(R)
05/26/78(R)
01/15/88(R)
08/02/82(R)
02/05/86(R)
08/03/81(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/01/84(R)
03/15/84(R)
01/17/86(R)
02/27/84(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/01/87(R)
12/04/86(R)
03/15/84(R)
01/06/83(R)
01/30/84(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/18/83(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/19/84(R)
01/31/83(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/15/78(R)
01/19/83(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
12/19/84(R)
04/17/85(R)
04/03/84(R)
04/01/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/95
11/18/83(M)
04/30/86(M)
02/01/78
10/18/88
09/05/84
01/05/78
03/09/84(M)
07/23/82(M)
09/30/83
(NSFHA)
01/15/88
04/17/85
02/05/86
08/03/81
05/01/85(M)
06/01/84
03/15/84
01/17/86(M)
02/27/84(M)
04/17/85(M)
12/01/87(L)
12/04/86
03/15/84
07/06/83
(NSFHA)
04/17/85(M)
03/18/83(M)
11/05/97
(NSFHA)
12/23/83(M)
12/15/82
02/15/84
01/19/83
1 1/03/82
06/05/89(M)
12/20/00
03/07/01
04/01/88(L)
09/24/84(M)
08/01/87(L)
07/17/78
Page 10 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360073#
360139#
360074#
360464#
361052
361601#
360821#
361370A
361100#
360649#
361195B
360449#
361255#
360944B
361511B
361225#
361316#
360716#
360856#
360416#
360579#
361003#
361101#
360384#
361452#
360599#
360600#
360111B
360400B
360305B
361587#
361317A
361109#
361318
361455B
361433
360465#
360336
361295A
360872#
360738#
360275#
360601#
360614#
361571#
361178A
360699#
Community Name
FRANKLINVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FREDONIA, VILLAGE OF
FREEDOM, TOWN OF
FREEPORT, VILLAGE OF
FREEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FREMONT, TOWN OF
FREMONT, TOWN OF
FRENCH CREEK, TOWN OF
FRIENDSHIP, TOWN OF
FULTON, CITY OF
FULTON, TOWN OF
FULTONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GAINES, TOWN OF
GAINESVILLE, TOWN OF
GAINESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GALEN, TOWN OF
GALLATIN, TOWN OF
GALWAY, TOWN OF
GARDINER, TOWN OF
GATES, TOWN OF
GEDDOS, TOWNSHIP OF
GENESEE FALLS, TOWN OF
GENESEE, TOWN OF
GENESEO, TOWN OF
GENESEO, VILLAGE OF
GENEVA, CITY OF
GENEVA, TOWN OF
GENOA,TOWN OF
GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF
GERMAN FLATTS, TOWN OF
GERMAN, TOWN OF
GERMANTOWN, TOWN OF
GERRY, TOWN OF
GHENT, TOWN OF
GILBERTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GILBOA, TOWN OF
GLEN COVE, CITY OF
GLEN PARK, VILLAGE OF
GLEN, TOWN OF
GLENS FALLS, CITY OF
GLENVILLE,TOWN OF
GLOVERSVILLE, CITY OF
GORHAM, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, VILLAGE OF
GOUVERNEUR, TOWN OF
GOUVERNEUR, VILLAGE OF
County
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/78(R)
07/16/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
02/14/76(R)
05/01/88(R)
10/29/82(R)
05/25/84(R)
06/08/84(R)
12/18/84(R)
04/15/82(R)
11/18/83(R)
10/15/82(R)
06/08/84(R)
12/23/83(R)
02/15/85(R)
05/16/83(R)
10/16/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/01/84(R)
07/30/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/27/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
02/15/78(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
1 1/02/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/11/79(R)
01/06/84(R)
01/01/88(R)
11/01/85(R)
05/01/88(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/19/84(R)
02/19/86(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/01/84(R)
09/30/83(R)
01/05/78(R)
04/30/86(R)
04/30/86(R)
08/06/82(R)
11/02/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/78
11/15/89
08/19/91
04/02/97
05/01/88(L)
10/29/82(M)
04/03/87
06/08/84(M)
12/18/84
04/15/82
11/18/83(M)
10/15/82
06/08/84(M)
12/23/83(M)
02/15/85(M)
05/16/83
10/16/84
08/16/95
07/16/97
08/02/93
02/17/82
05/01/84
07/30/82(M)
09/29/96
09/29/96
04/15/82
02/15/78
1 1/04/83(M)
1 1/02/84(M)
05/15/85(M)
09/24/84(M)
05/11/79(M)
01/06/84(M)
01/01/88(L)
11/01/85(M)
05/01/88(L)
04/02/97
(NSFHA)
02/19/86(M)
06/05/85
05/04/87
09/30/83
12/05/96
04/30/86
04/30/86
08/06/82(M)
03/03/97
Page 11 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360075#
361150#
360650#
360242#
360680#
361363A
361232A
360886B
360466#
361519#
360076#
360417#
360009#
36091 1#
361087#
360159#
360717#
361319#
361004#
360290
360615#
360887#
361233#
360616#
361210A
360365B
361217A
360849#
361005#
360385#
360010#
361088A
360718#
360450A
360873#
360291A
360719#
360244#
360243#
360200B
36040 IB
360402A
360418#
360700
360775#
36 1442 A
Community Name
GOWANDA, VILLAGE OF
GRAFTON, TOWN OF
GRANBY, TOWN OF
GRAND ISLAND, TOWN OF
GRAND VIEW-ON-HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
GRANGER, TOWN OF
GRANVILLE, TOWN OF
GRANVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GREAT NECK ESTATES, VILLAGE OF
GREAT NECK, VILLAGE OF
GREAT VALLEY, TOWN OF
GREECE, TOWN OF
GREEN ISLAND, VILLAGE OF
GREENBURGH,TOWN OF
GREENE, TOWN OF
GREENE, VILLAGE OF
GREENFIELD, TOWN OF
GREENPORT, TOWN OF
GREENPORT, VILLAGE OF
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENWICH, VILLAGE OF
GREENWICH,TOWN OF
GREENWOOD LAKE, VILLAGE OF
GREENWOOD, TOWN OF
GREIG, TOWN OF
GROTON, TOWN OF
GROTON, VILLAGE OF
GROVE, TOWN OF
GROVELAND, TOWN OF
GUILDERLAND, TOWN OF
GUILFORD, TOWN OF
HADLEY, TOWN OF
HAGAMAN, VILLAGE OF
HAGUE, TOWN OF
HALCOTT, TOWN OF
HALFMOON, TOWN OF
HAMBURG, TOWN OF
HAMBURG, VILLAGE OF
HAMDEN,TOWN OF
HAMILTON, TOWN OF
HAMILTON, VILLAGE
HAMLIN, TOWN OF
HAMMOND, TOWN OF
HAMMONDSPORT, VILLAGE OF
HAMPTON, TOWN OF
County
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/77(R)
10/13/78(R)
09/16/82(R)
01/16/80(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/07/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/17/78(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/03/81(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
02/01/88(R)
03/04/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/03/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
10/05/84(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
07/09/82(R)
12/15/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
07/06/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/18/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
03/01/84(R)
11/19/80(R)
01/20/82(R)
03/04/86(R)
05/01/85(R)
04/01/87(R)
02/01/78(R)
12/19/84(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/77
10/13/78(M)
09/16/82
01/16/80
10/15/81
10/07/83(M)
08/05/85(M)
04/17/85(M)
04/02/97
04/02/97
07/17/78
09/30/92
06/04/80
06/18/87
08/03/81
08/03/81
08/16/95
11/15/89
05/04/98
02/01/88(L)
03/04/85
05/04/00
03/16/92
06/15/79
09/03/82(M)
05/15/85(M)
10/05/84(M)
1 1/05/86
11/06/91
02/15/91
01/06/83
07/06/84(M)
08/16/95
03/18/86(M)
09/29/96
1 1/04/83(M)
08/16/95
10/04/94
01/20/82
03/04/86(M)
05/01/85(M)
04/01/87(L)
02/01/78
(NSFHA)
04/17/78
04/17/85(M)
Page 12 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360617#
360201#
360202#
360651
360652A
365336#
361578#
360180B
361611#
360203B
361124#
360618#
360366
360912#
361451C
361234A
360500#
361602#
361271B
360653#
360913#
360681#
360682#
361513#
361443B
361204B
360467#
360338#
360419#
360306B
360307#
361424
361464#
360339#
36070 IB
360468#
360469#
360470#
361453#
360822#
361251#
360683#
361320A
360420#
360077#
360204B
360530#
Community Name
HAMPTONBURGH, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, VILLAGE OF
HANNIBAL, TOWN OF
HANNIBAL, VILLAGE OF
HANOVER, TOWN OF
HARDENBURGH, TOWN OF
HARFORD, TOWN OF
HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARPERSFIELD, TOWN OF
HARRIETSTOWN, TOWN OF
HARRIMAN, VILLAGE OF
HARRISBURG, TOWN OF
HARRISON, TOWN OF
HARRISVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HARTFORD, TOWN OF
HARTLAND, TOWN OF
HARTSVILLE, TOWN OF
HARTWICK, TOWN OF
HASTINGS, TOWN OF
HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
HAVERSTRAW, TOWN OF
HAVERSTRAW, VILLAGE OF
HEAD OF THE HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
HECTOR, TOWN OF
HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF
HENDERSON, TOWN OF
HENRIETTA, TOWN OF
HERKIMER, TOWN OF
HERKIMER, VILLAGE OF
HERMON, TOWN OF
HERMON, VILLAGE OF
HERRINGS, VILLAGE OF
HEUVELTON, VILLAGE OF
HEWLETT BAY PARK, VILLAGE OF
HEWLETT HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
HEWLETT NECK, VILLAGE OF
HIGHLAND FALLS, VILLAGE OF
HIGHLAND, TOWN OF
HIGHLANDS, TOWNSHIP OF
HILLBURN, VILLAGE OF
HILLSDALE, TOWN OF
HILTON, VILLAGE OF
HINSDALE, TOWN OF
HOBART, VILLAGE OF
HOLLAND PATENT, VILLAGE OF
County
ORANGE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/86(R)
09/28/90(R)
12/10/82(R)
02/01/88(R)
04/01/87(R)
09/17/71(R)
07/20/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
12/01/86(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
09/01/83(R)
07/30/84(R)
03/15/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
11/01/85(R)
10/07/83(R)
09/17/82(R)
11/04/83(R)
01/19/83(R)
04/02/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
08/01/83(R)
04/17/85(R)
07/20/84(R)
04/16/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
11/05/80(R)
04/17/85(R)
06/01/78(R)
12/19/84(R)
12/19/84(R)
12/18/85(R)
04/30/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/25/76(R)
03/23/84(R)
11/30/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/03/81(R)
01/17/79(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/86
09/28/90
09/28/90
02/01/88(L)
04/01/87(L)
12/18/84
03/16/89
05/15/85(M)
12/01/86(L)
06/05/85(M)
01/03/85
09/01/83
(NSFHA)
08/05/91
09/24/84(M)
11/01/85(M)
10/07/83(M)
09/17/82(M)
11/04/83(M)
01/19/83
04/02/79
01/06/82
09/02/81
05/04/98
06/15/94
07/20/84(M)
07/16/97
05/18/92
06/22/98
04/17/85(M)
06/01/78
(NSFHA)
08/03/98
12/18/85
04/30/86(M)
07/16/97
07/16/97
07/16/97
05/19/87
03/04/87
05/19/87
09/20/96
05/15/85(M)
03/04/88
01/17/79
05/15/85(M)
05/21/01
Page 13 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360245#
361454B
360181#
360182#
36042 1#
360674B
361154A
361403B
361300B
361179A
360874B
361211A
360776#
360777#
360153#
360154#
360340#
361434A
361051
361512#
361007#
360078#
360292#
360293#
361543#
360796#
360857#
360892#
361338#
360308#
361008#
361113B
361404
360112B
360422#
360914#
360079#
36047 1#
365337#
360958C
360850#
360851#
361444#
360141#
361212B
361244B
360265#
361196#
Community Name
HOLLAND, TOWN OF
HOLLEY, VILLAGE OF
HOMER, TOWN OF
HOMER, VILLAGE OF
HONEOYE FALLS, VILLAGE OF
HOOSICK FALLS, VILLAGE OF
HOOSICK, TOWN OF
HOPE, TOWN OF
HOPEWELL, TOWN OF
HOPKINTON, TOWN OF
HORICON, TOWN OF
HORNBY, TOWN OF
HORNELL, CITY OF
HORNELLSVILLE, TOWN OF
HORSEHEADS, TOWN OF
HORSEHEADS, VILLAGE OF
HOUNSFIELD, TOWN OF
HOWARD, TOWN OF
HUDSON FALLS, VILLAGE OF
HUDSON, CITY OF
HUME, TOWN OF
HUMPHREY, TOWN OF
HUNTER, TOWN OF
HUNTER, VILLAGE OF
HUNTINGTON BAY, VILLAGE OF
HUNTINGTON, TOWN OF
HURLEY, TOWN OF
HURON, TOWN OF
HYDE PARK, TOWN OF
ILION, VILLAGE OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWN OF
INDIAN LAKE, TOWN OF
INLET, TOWN OF
IRA, TOWN OF
IRONDEQUOIT, TOWN OF
IRVINGTON, VILLAGE OF
ISCHUA, TOWN OF
ISLAND PARK, VILLAGE OF
ISLIP,TOWNSHIP OF
ITALY, TOWN OF
ITHACA, CITY OF
ITHACA, TOWN OF
JACKSON, TOWN OF
JAMESTOWN, CITY OF
JASPER, TOWN OF
JAVA, TOWN OF
JAY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
County
ERIE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/79(R)
11/30/79(R)
08/15/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/16/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/30/86(R)
02/27/84(R)
11/12/82(R)
02/15/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/03/82(R)
12/19/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/13/82(R)
02/02/83(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/18/83(R)
11/01/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/15/84(R)
02/01/84(R)
07/09/82(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/14/85(R)
02/06/84(R)
11/15/78(R)
03/15/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
02/14/76(R)
11/17/72(R)
07/23/82(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
06/01/78(R)
07/23/82(R)
12/23/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
05/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/01/79
11/30/79(M)
08/15/83
08/15/83
04/16/82
05/16/80(M)
08/01/87(L)
04/30/86(M)
02/27/84(M)
11/12/82(M)
02/15/85(M)
04/15/86
03/18/80
07/16/80
09/29/96
09/29/96
05/18/92
09/03/82(M)
(NSFHA)
09/29/89
10/02/97
08/13/82(M)
02/02/83
12/01/82
05/04/98
05/04/98
08/18/92
01/19/96
12/15/84
09/08/99
07/09/82(M)
12/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/06/84(M)
11/15/78
03/15/79
08/15/78
04/02/97
05/04/98
03/07/01
09/30/81
06/19/85
03/16/92
06/01/78
07/23/82(M)
12/23/83(M)
08/15/83
05/01/88(L)
Page 14 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361474#
360959C
361114#
360875#
360047#
360276#
361131B
360580#
361151#
360266#
360643#
361590
360472#
360671#
361075#
361321#
361048#
360473#
361235#
360858#
361218#
360531#
360048#
361610#
36001 1#
360205C
360247#
361350B
360581#
361011#
360876#
360877#
360878#
361492
361405
361582#
360142#
360249#
360248#
360852#
361326A
360915#
360474#
360475#
361419A
361351#
360702
360476#
360280#
360281#
360403B
Community Name
JEFFERSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
JERUSALEM, TOWN OF
JEWETT, TOWN OF
JOHNSBURG, TOWN OF
JOHNSON CITY, VILLAGE OF
JOHNSTOWN, CITY OF
JOHNSTOWN, TOWN OF
JORDON, VILLAGE OF
KEENE, TOWN OF
KEESEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
KENDALL, TOWN OF
KENMORE,VILLAGE OF
KENSINGTON, VILLAGE OF
KENT, TOWN OF
KIANTONE, TOWN OF
KINDERHOOK, TOWN OF
KINDERHOOK, VILLAGE OF
KINGS POINT, VILLAGE OF
KINGSBURY, TOWN OF
KINGSTON, CITY OF
KINGSTON, TOWN OF
KIRKLAND, TOWN OF
KIRKWOOD, TOWN OF
KIRYAS JOEL, VILLAGE OF
KNOX, TOWNSHIP OF
KORTRIGHT, TOWN OF
LACKAWANNA, CITY OF
LACONA, VILLAGE OF
LAFAYETTE, TOWN OF
LAGRANGE, TOWN OF
LAKE GEORGE, TOWN OF
LAKE GEORGE, VILLAGE OF
LAKE LUZERNE, TOWN OF
LAKE PLACID, VILLAGE OF
LAKE PLEASANT, TOWN OF
LAKE SUCCESS, VILLAGE OF
LAKEWOOD, VILLAGE OF
LANCASTER, TOWN OF
LANCASTER, VILLAGE OF
LANSING, TOWN OF
LAPEER, TOWN OF
LARCHMONT, VILLAGE OF
LATTINGTOWN, VILLAGE OF
LAUREL HOLLOW, VILLAGE OF
LAURENS, TOWN OF
LAURENS, VILLAGE OF
LAWRENCE, TOWN OF
LAWRENCE, VILLAGE OF
LE ROY, TOWN OF
LE ROY, VILLAGE OF
LEBANON, TOWN OF
County
SULLIVAN COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/23/84(R)
01/20/84(R)
04/04/83(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/18/83(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/16/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
05/01/78(R)
05/26/78(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/04/86(R)
04/01/83(R)
12/01/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/07/79(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/27/82(R)
04/03/85(R)
06/01/77(R)
08/31/94
08/13/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/11/79(R)
04/03/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/30/86(R)
06/22/84(R)
05/01/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
02/14/85(R)
05/26/78(R)
11/02/77(R)
12/01/81(R)
07/02/79(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/01/77(R)
09/01/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/17/87(R)
12/19/84(R)
05/16/83(R)
09/14/79(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/17/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/90
01/20/84(M)
04/09/83
05/01/85(M)
09/30/77
07/18/83
07/03/85(M)
08/16/82
06/05/85(M)
06/05/85(M)
05/01/78
(NSFHA)
04/02/97
09/04/86
02/02/96
12/01/82
12/01/82
04/02/97
09/07/79(M)
05/01/85
04/05/88
04/03/85
06/01/77
11/01/84
08/13/82(M)
05/15/85(M)
07/02/80
05/11/79(M)
04/03/85
09/08/99
08/16/96
09/29/96
05/01/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/02/77
02/23/01
07/02/79
10/15/85
07/20/84(M)
07/16/84
04/02/97
04/02/97
05/15/85(M)
04/17/87(M)
(NSFHA)
04/02/97
09/14/79(M)
08/03/81
04/17/85(M)
Page 15 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360113#
360532#
361285#
361456A
360404#
360080#
360341#
361152A
360368#
361227A
360502#
360501
360294#
360369B
360823#
360824#
361286A
361457B
360081#
361376A
360405B
360798#
360778#
360703
360049B
360050B
360309#
360310#
36031 1#
361066#
360082#
360582#
360175B
360386#
361458
360799#
361012#
360114B
360503#
361013#
360753#
361603
365338#
361406#
361180
361558#
360370#
360825B
360343#
Community Name
LEDYARD, TOWN OF
LEE, TOWN OF
LEICESTER, TOWN OF
LEICESTER, VILLAGE OF
LENOX, TOWN OF
LEON, TOWN OF
LERAY, TOWN OF
LEWIS, TOWN OF
LEWIS, TOWN OF
LEWISBORO, TOWN OF
LEWISTON, TOWN OF
LEWISTON, VILLAGE OF
LEXINGTON, TOWN OF
LEYDEN, TOWN OF
LIBERTY, TOWN OF
LIBERTY, VILLAGE OF
LIMA, TOWN OF
LIMA, VILLAGE OF
LIMESTONE, VILLAGE OF
LINCKLAEN, TOWN OF
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LINDENHURST, VILLAGE OF
LINDLEY, TOWN OF
LISBON, TOWN OF
LISLE, TOWN OF
LISLE, VILLAGE OF
LITCHFIELD, TOWN OF
LITTLE FALLS, CITY OF
LITTLE FALLS, TOWN OF
LITTLE VALLEY, TOWN OF
LITTLE VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
LIVERPOOL, VILLAGE OF
LIVINGSTON, TOWN OF
LIVONIA, TOWN OF
LIVONIA, VILLAGE OF
LLOYD HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
LLOYD, TOWN OF
LOCKE, TOWN OF
LOCKPORT, CITY OF
LOCKPORT, TOWN OF
LODI, TOWN OF
LODI, VILLAGE OF
LONG BEACH, CITY OF
LONG LAKE, TOWN OF
LOUISVILLE, TOWN OF
LOWVILLE, TOWN OF
LOWVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
LYME, TOWN OF
County
CAYUGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/06/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/20/82(R)
08/27/82(R)
03/18/87(R)
08/13/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/23/82(R)
03/09/84(R)
06/18/80(R)
07/06/84(R)
08/01/83(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/30/77(R)
12/23/83(R)
07/23/82(R)
04/17/78(R)
03/23/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/15/77(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/19/84(R)
01/06/84(R)
01/06/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/04/83(R)
03/28/80(R)
06/22/84(R)
02/01/78(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/11/79(R)
02/01/78(R)
06/01/88(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/17/82(R)
11/04/83(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
01/15/88(R)
07/23/82(R)
06/30/72(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/19/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
02/27/84(R)
04/15/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/06/84(M)
08/03/98
01/20/82
08/27/82(M)
06/03/88
08/13/82(M)
01/16/92
05/15/85(M)
09/29/96
03/09/84(M)
06/18/80
(NSFHA)
08/01/83
06/19/85(M)
06/05/85
02/01/85
12/23/83(M)
07/23/82(M)
04/17/78
03/23/84(M)
09/04/85(M)
05/04/98
08/01/80
(NSFHA)
01/06/84(M)
01/06/84(M)
05/07/01
04/04/83
03/28/80(M)
06/22/84(M)
02/01/78
02/04/81
05/11/79(M)
02/19/92
06/01/88(L)
05/04/98
07/05/00
11/04/83(M)
02/04/81
02/19/92
01/15/88
(NSFHA)
04/02/97
09/24/84(M)
(NSFHA)
06/20/00
06/20/00
02/27/84(M)
09/02/93
Page 16 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360083#
361459#
361065B
361226#
360891#
360371B
360583#
361230#
360893#
360084#
360704
361292#
361181
36005 1#
360271B
360272#
360720#
361633#
360826#
360917#
360916#
361301B
361014B
360312B
360584#
360977#
360479#
360085B
360183#
361219#
360585#
360586#
360533#
360208#
360250#
361446
361220#
360534#
360372B
361272B
360206B
360480#
361182#
360705#
361132B
361059#
361377A
Community Name
LYNDON, TOWN OF
LYNDONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LYONS FALLS, VILLAGE OF
LYONS, TOWN OF
LYONS, VILLAGE OF
LYONSDALE, TOWN OF
LYSANDER, TOWN OF
MACEDON, TOWN OF
MACEDON, VILLAGE OF
MACHIAS, TOWN OF
MACOMB, TOWN OF
MADISON, TOWN OF
MADRID, TOWN OF
MAINE, TOWN OF
MALONE, TOWN OF
MALONE, VILLAGE OF
MALTA, TOWN OF
MALVERNE, VILLAGE OF
MAMAKATING, TOWN OF
MAMARONECK, TOWN OF
MAMARONECK, VILLAGE OF
MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
MANCHESTER, VILLGE OF
MANHEIM, TOWN OF
MANLIUS, TOWN OF
MANLIUS, VILLAGE OF
MANORHAVEN, VILLAGE OF
MANSFIELD, TOWN OF
MARATHON, VILLAGE OF
MARBLETOWN, TOWN OF
MARCELLUS, TOWN OF
MARCELLUS, VILLAGE OF
MARCY, TOWN OF
MARGARETVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MARILLA, TOWN OF
MARION, TOWN OF
MARLBOROUGH, TOWN OF
MARSHALL, TOWN OF
MARTINSBURG, TOWN OF
MARYLAND, TOWN OF
MASONVILLE, TOWN OF
MASSAPEQUA PARK, VILLAGE OF
MASSENA, TOWN OF
MASSENA, VILLAGE OF
MAYFIELD, TOWN OF
MAYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MC DONOUGH, TOWN OF
County
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/82(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/07/79(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/19/85(R)
01/06/82(R)
01/05/84(R)
09/30/83(R)
08/20/82(R)
12/19/84(R)
01/19/83(R)
12/19/84(R)
03/18/83(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/01/84(R)
ll/28/97(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/01/77(R)
03/09/84(R)
01/20/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
12/15/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/83(R)
05/25/84(R)
10/15/82(R)
10/22/82(R)
08/16/82(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/04/90(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/01/88(R)
12/05/84(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/17/86(R)
11/05/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/82(M)
09/16/81
06/19/85(M)
09/07/79(M)
03/16/83
06/19/85(M)
02/04/83
01/05/84
09/30/83
08/20/82(M)
(NSFHA)
01/19/83
(NSFHA)
02/05/92
09/04/85(M)
04/03/78
08/16/95
04/02/97
09/30/92
09/15/89
04/03/84
03/09/84(M)
01/20/84(M)
05/01/85(M)
09/17/92
08/01/84
07/20/98
05/25/84(M)
10/15/82
08/05/91
08/16/82
06/01/82
06/01/84
06/04/90
09/29/78
07/01/88(L)
12/05/84
09/30/82
06/19/85(M)
06/03/86(M)
11/01/85(M)
04/02/97
06/17/86(M)
11/05/80
08/05/85(M)
01/05/78
06/05/85(M)
Page 17 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360184#
36072 1#
360644#
360012#
360423#
360115#
360207B
361520B
360654#
361460#
361245#
360744#
361268
360505#
360960#
360619#
360209#
360313B
361339#
361274B
360481#
360219B
360220#
360155B
360961C
360722#
361371A
36045 1#
361153#
361261#
360620#
361017#
360452
360314#
361125B
360621#
360622#
361617#
360116#
360623#
360624#
361613
361018#
360747
361383A
361488A
360117B
360118#
360723#
361407
361389#
361273C
361353B
Community Name
MCGRAW, VILLAGE OF
MECHANICVILLE, CITY OF
MEDINA, VILLAGE OF
MENANDS, VILLAGE OF
MENDON, TOWN OF
MENTZ, TOWN OF
MEREDITH, TOWN OF
MERIDIAN, VILLAGE OF
MEXICO, TOWN OF
MEXICO, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLEBURG, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLEBURGH, TOWN OF
MIDDLEFIELD, TOWN OF
MIDDLEPORT, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLESEX, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN, CITY OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
MIDDLEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MILAN, TOWN OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
MILL NECK, VILLAGE OF
MILLBROOK, VILLAGE OF
MILLERTON, VILLAGE OF
MILLPORT, VILLAGE OF
MILO, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
MINA, TOWN OF
MINDEN, TOWN OF
MINERVA, TOWN OF
MINETTO, TOWN OF
MINISINK, TOWN OF
MINOA, VILLAGE OF
MOHAWK, TOWN OF
MOHAWK, VILLAGE OF
MOIRA, TOWN OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
MONROE, VILLAGE OF
MONTEBELLO, VILLAGE OF
MONTEZUMA, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY, VILLAGE OF
MONTICELLO, VILLAGE OF
MONTOUR FALLS, VILLAGE OF
MONTOUR, TOWN OF
MOOERS, TOWN OF
MOOERS, VILLAGE OF
MORAVIA, TOWN OF
MORAVIA, VILLAGE OF
MOREAU, TOWN OF
MOREHOUSE, TOWN OF
MORIAH, TOWN OF
MORRIS, TOWN OF
MORRIS, VILLAGE OF
County
CORTLAND COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/01/82(R)
01/05/84(R)
03/28/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/17/78(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/11/79(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/15/81(R)
03/15/84(R)
03/15/84(R)
06/01/88(R)
08/01/83(R)
09/29/89(R)
03/02/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/10/79(R)
05/19/87(R)
10/18/83(R)
02/27/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/15/88(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
01/19/83(R)
10/05/84(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/27/79(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/15/86(R)
12/01/81(R)
01/06/82(R)
01/18/89(R)
04/18/83(R)
10/16/84(R)
10/16/84(R)
05/10/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
03/01/88(R)
06/19/85(R)
01/17/86(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/15/84(R)
02/14/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/03/86(R)
12/04/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/01/82
08/16/95
03/28/80(M)
03/18/80
04/15/82
1 1/05/82
05/15/85(M)
05/11/79(M)
10/15/81
10/15/81
03/15/84
03/15/84
06/01/88(L)
08/01/83
09/29/89
03/02/83
08/02/93
07/03/85(M)
08/10/79(M)
05/19/87(M)
04/02/97
02/27/84(M)
01/03/85
06/15/88(M)
07/18/85(M)
08/16/95
06/08/84(M)
01/19/83
10/05/84(M)
09/30/81
04/03/85
09/02/82
08/05/85(M)
09/08/99
04/15/86(M)
02/23/01
01/06/82
01/18/89
04/18/83
10/16/84
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
09/15/83
03/01/88(L)
06/19/85(M)
01/17/86(M)
06/19/85(M)
09/30/82
08/16/95
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
01/03/86(M)
12/04/85(M)
Page 18 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360706C
361557#
360406#
360625B
360918#
360387#
360969#
360919#
360920#
360407#
361256#
360052#
360602B
360603#
360086C
361155#
360675C
361293B
361019B
360828#
360087#
360295#
361303A
360160B
360373#
360921#
360535#
360536#
360655#
361618#
361102#
360176C
36 1420 A
360859#
361544#
360922#
360013#
360684
360628#
360537#
360497#
360835#
Community Name
MORRISTOWN, TOWN OF
MORRISTOWN, VILLAGE OF
MORRISVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT HOPE, TOWN OF
MOUNT KISCO, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT MORRIS, TOWN OF
MOUNT MORRIS, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, TOWN OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MUNNSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MURRAY, TOWN OF
NANTICOKE, TOWN OF
NAPLES, TOWN OF
NAPLES, VILLAGE OF
NAPOLI, TOWN OF
NASSAU, TOWN OF
NASSAU, VILLAGE OF
NELSON, TOWN OF
NELSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEVERSINK, TOWN OF
NEW ALBION, TOWN OF
NEW BALTIMORE, TOWN OF
NEW BERLIN, TOWN OF
NEW BERLIN, VILLAGE OF
NEW BREMEN, TOWN OF
NEW CASTLE, TOWN OF
NEW HARTFORD, TOWN OF
NEW HARTFORD, VILLAGE OF
NEW HAVEN, TOWN OF
NEW HEMPSTEAD, VILLAGE OF
NEW HUDSON, TOWN OF
NEW LEBANON, TOWN OF
NEW LISBON, TOWN OF
NEW PALTZ, TOWN OF
NEW PALTZ, VILLAGE OF
NEW ROCHELLE, CITY OF
NEW SCOTLAND, TOWN OF
NEW SQUARE, VILLAGE OF
NEW WINDSOR, TOWN OF
NEW YORK MILLS, VILLAGE OF
NEW YORK, CITY OF
NEWARK VALLEY, TOWN OF
County
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
BRONX COUNTY
KINGS COUNTY
NEW YORK COUNTY
QUEENS COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/06/82(R)
12/02/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
10/05/84(R)
09/18/86(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/21/80(R)
12/18/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/02/82(R)
09/05/84(R)
08/11/78(R)
10/05/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/03/82(R)
07/23/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/04/83(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/05/79(R)
04/18/83(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/17/82(R)
12/16/88(R)
08/20/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/18/83(R)
09/30/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/18/80(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/22/78(R)
12/15/78(R)
05/16/83(R)
11/16/83(R)
02/03/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/06/82(M)
12/02/80(M)
04/15/82
10/05/84(M)
09/18/86
12/11/81
08/01/78
01/29/82
10/17/78
09/15/83
03/21/80(M)
12/18/85
06/08/84(M)
09/30/77
07/02/82(M)
09/05/84
05/18/79(M)
10/05/84(M)
09/10/84(M)
05/25/84(M)
12/03/82(M)
07/23/82(M)
06/05/85(M)
11/04/83(M)
05/04/00
09/05/79
04/18/83
07/05/83
05/18/92
12/16/88
08/20/82(M)
06/05/85(M)
11/18/83(M)
11/01/85
10/15/85
01/06/83
12/01/82
(NSFHA)
12/15/78
05/04/00
05/21/01
02/03/82
Page 19 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360836#
360894#
360626#
360627#
361390A
360504#
360853B
361111#
360315#
36025 1#
360506#
360507#
360837#
360119B
360739#
361510#
361183B
360923#
360388#
361156#
361164#
361076#
360800#
360482#
361600#
361477#
361391A
361089#
361240#
360587
361515#
360508#
361400B
361340#
360801#
360725#
361484
361110B
360161#
360162#
361345A
361287#
360389#
360685#
361119B
361500B
365339#
361516A
360424#
Community Name
NEWARK VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
NEWARK, VILLAGE OF
NEWBURGH, CITY OF
NEWBURGH, TOWN OF
NEWCOMB, TOWN OF
NEWFANE, TOWN OF
NEWFIELD, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, VILLAGE OF
NEWSTEAD, TOWN OF
NIAGARA FALLS, CITY OF
NIAGARA, TOWN OF
NICHOLS, TOWN OF
NILES, TOWN OF
NISKAYUNA, TOWN OF
NISSEQUOGUE, VILLAGE OF
NORFOLK, TOWN OF
NORTH CASTLE, TOWN OF
NORTH DANSVILLE, TOWN OF
NORTH ELBA, TOWN OF
NORTH GREENBUSH,TOWN OF
NORTH HARMONY, TOWN OF
NORTH HAVEN, VILLAGE OF
NORTH HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF
NORTH HILLS, VILLAGE OF
NORTH HORNELL, VILLAGE OF
NORTH HUDSON, TOWN OF
NORTH NORWICH, TOWN OF
NORTH SALEM, TOWN OF
NORTH SYRACUSE, VILLAGE OF
NORTH TARRYTOWN, VILLAGE OF
NORTH TONAWANDA, CITY OF
NORTHAMPTON, TOWN OF
NORTHEAST, TOWN OF
NORTHPORT, VILLAGE OF
NORTHUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
NORTHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NORWAY, TOWN OF
NORWICH, CITY OF
NORWICH, TOWN OF
NORWOOD, VILLAGE OF
NUNDA, TOWN OF
NUNDA, VILLAGE OF
NYACK, VILLAGE OF
OAKFIELD, TOWN OF
OAKFIELD, VILLAGE OF
OCEAN BEACH, VILLAGE OF
ODESSA, VILLAGE OF
OGDEN, TOWN OF
County
TIOGA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/03/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/18/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/15/84(R)
02/17/82(R)
02/06/84(R)
03/01/78(R)
05/16/83(R)
04/15/86(R)
12/02/83(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/20/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/30/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
01/31/83(R)
01/17/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/03/86(R)
1 1/20/85(R)
08/17/81(R)
01/06/82(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/05/84(R)
04/18/83(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/18/85(R)
11/15/84(R)
04/30/86(R)
07/03/85(R)
03/23/84(R)
05/25/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
03/23/84(R)
05/21/71(R)
04/20/84(R)
04/16/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/03/82
07/15/88
06/05/85
06/05/85
06/05/85(M)
11/18/81
10/15/85(M)
06/02/99
04/02/91
05/04/92
09/05/90
06/15/84
02/17/82
02/06/84(M)
03/01/78
05/04/98
04/15/86(M)
01/02/91
12/04/79
07/20/79(M)
06/18/80
02/15/80
05/04/98
07/20/98
(NSFHA)
01/17/86
05/15/85(M)
12/03/91
07/03/86
(NSFHA)
08/17/81
01/06/82
08/19/85(M)
09/05/84
05/04/98
08/16/95
(NSFHA)
07/03/85(M)
12/18/85
11/15/84
04/30/86(M)
07/03/85(M)
03/23/84(M)
12/04/85
05/25/84(M)
03/23/84(M)
05/04/98
04/20/84(M)
04/16/79
Page 20 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360707#
361408A
361545#
360088#
360089#
360860#
361526#
360408#
360667#
361275#
360588#
360895#
360748C
360686#
360945#
360255#
360254#
361354#
360538#
360345#
360374A
360970B
361241#
361021#
360120#
360708#
360656#
360657#
361284#
361022#
360589B
36 1276 A
361090B
360090B
360754#
360839#
360840#
361304B
360163#
361486#
360483#
360779#
361413#
360974#
360896#
360346#
360143#
360539#
Community Name
OGDENSBURG, CITY OF
OHIO, TOWN OF
OLD FIELD, VILLAGE OF
OLEAN, CITY OF
OLEAN, TOWN OF
OLIVE, TOWN OF
ONEIDA CASTLE, VILLAGE OF
ONEIDA, CITY OF
ONEONTA, CITY OF
ONEONTA, TOWN OF
ONONDAGA, TOWN OF
ONTARIO, TOWN OF
ORANGE, TOWN OF
ORANGETOWN, TOWN OF
ORANGEVILLE, TOWN OF
ORCHARD PARK, TOWN OF
ORCHARD PARK, VILLAGE OF
ORISKANY FALLS, VILLAGE OF
ORISKANY, VILLAGE OF
ORLEANS, TOWN OF
OSCEOLA, TOWN OF
OSSIAN, TOWN OF
OSSINING, TOWN OF
OSSINING, VILLAGE OF
OSWASCO, TOWN OF
OSWEGATCHIE, TOWN OF
OSWEGO, CITY OF
OSWEGO, TOWN OF
OTEGO, TOWN OF
OTEGO, VILLAGE OF
OTISCO, TOWN OF
OTSEGO, TOWN OF
OTSELIC, TOWN OF
OTTO, TOWN OF
OVID, TOWN OF
OWEGO, TOWN OF
OWEGO, VILLAGE OF
OXFORD, TOWN OF
OXFORD, VILLAGE OF
OYSTER BAY COVE, VILLAGE OF
OYSTER BAY, TOWN OF
PAINTED POST, VILLAGE OF
PALATINE, TOWN OF
PALMYRA, TOWN OF
PALMYRA, VILLAGE OF
PAMELIA, TOWN OF
PANAMA, VILLAGE OF
PARIS, TOWN OF
County
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/05/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/18/83(R)
11/01/78(R)
02/01/79(R)
11/01/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
10/17/86(R)
01/18/84(R)
06/01/78(R)
04/20/84(R)
08/02/82(R)
12/23/83(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
01/19/83(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/01/78(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/08/84(R)
03/16/83(R)
07/05/82(R)
02/06/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
02/04/87(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/20/84(R)
01/15/88(R)
06/15/77(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/30/83(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/04/87(R)
03/01/78(R)
08/06/82(R)
07/30/82(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/15/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/05/80
09/24/84(M)
05/04/98
05/09/80
02/01/79
11/01/84
07/04/89
02/23/01
09/29/78
10/17/86
06/17/91
06/01/78
04/20/84(M)
08/02/82
12/23/83(M)
03/16/83
09/02/81
01/19/83
09/15/83
03/01/78
06/30/76(M)
06/08/84(M)
03/16/83
07/05/82
05/04/88
05/01/85(M)
1 1/22/99
06/20/01 >
02/04/87
1 1/05/86
06/03/86(M)
06/01/87(L)
06/05/85(M)
04/20/84(M)
01/15/88
01/17/97
04/02/82
08/24/84(M)
09/10/84(M)
04/02/97
04/02/97
05/18/00
05/04/87
03/01/78
07/15/88
01/02/92
03/01/78
09/15/83
Page 21 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
36 1546 A
361575B
361425A
360425#
360803#
361023#
360282B
361341#
361517#
360924#
360926#
360925#
360283#
360509#
360426#
360962#
360428#
360946B
361025B
360091B
360092B
361135B
361384#
361165#
361302#
361050B
360348#
360347#
361026#
360658#
36 1426 A
360687#
361427
360947B
361027B
360375
361141B
361184#
361092B
361277A
360429#
361581
361166#
361278A
360485#
Community Name
PARISH, TOWN OF
PARISH, VILLAGE OF
PARISHVILLE, TOWN OF
PARMA, TOWN OF
PATCHOQUE, VILLAGE OF
PATTERSON, TOWN OF
PAVILION, TOWN OF
PAWLING, TOWN OF
PAWLING, VILLAGE OF
PEEKSKILL, CITY OF
PELHAM MANOR, VILLAGE OF
PELHAM, VILLAGE OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PELHAM
PEMBROKE, TOWN OF
PENDLETON, TOWN OF
PENFIELD, TOWN OF
PENN YAN, VILLAGE OF
PERINTON, TOWN OF
PERRY, TOWN OF
PERRY, VILLAGE OF
PERRYSBURG, TOWN OF
PERSIA, TOWN OF
PERTH, TOWN OF
PERU, TOWN OF
PETERSBURG, TOWN OF
PHELPS, TOWN OF
PHELPS, VILLAGE OF
PHILADELPHIA, VILLAGE OF
PHILDELPHIA, TOWN OF
PHILIPSTOWN,TOWN OF
PHOENIX, VILLAGE OF
PIERCEFIELD, TOWN OF
PIERMONT, VILLAGE OF
PIERREPONT, TOWN OF
PIKE, TOWN OF
PIKE, VILLAGE OF
PINCKNEY, TOWN OF
PINE PLAINS, TOWN OF
PITCAIRN, TOWN OF
PITCHER, TOWN OF
PITTSFIELD, TOWN OF
PITTSFORD, TOWN OF
PITTSFORD, VILLAGE OF
PITTSTOWN, TOWN OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
PLANDOME HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
County
OSWEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/15/86(R)
02/19/86(R)
07/30/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
07/03/86(R)
02/27/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
08/01/84(R)
08/15/84(R)
01/03/79(R)
04/02/79(R)
01/20/84(R)
01/06/82(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/23/83(R)
07/15/77(R)
04/20/84(R)
04/20/84(R)
02/15/85(R)
05/04/87(R)
09/01/78(R)
12/03/82(R)
01/20/84(R)
02/15/85(R)
06/05/89(R)
06/18/87(R)
02/17/82(R)
01/06/84(R)
08/03/81(R)
12/19/84(R)
12/23/83(R)
06/18/82(R)
07/30/84(R)
10/05/84(R)
08/13/82(R)
03/04/86(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/23/82(R)
02/01/88(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
08/11/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/86(M)
02/19/86(M)
07/30/82(M)
05/18/92
05/04/98
07/03/86
02/27/84(M)
01/03/85
08/01/84
08/15/84
01/03/79
04/02/79
01/20/84(M)
01/06/82
02/18/81
06/15/81
05/18/92
12/23/83(M)
07/29/77(M)
04/20/84(M)
04/20/84(M)
02/15/85(M)
10/20/00
09/01/78(M)
12/03/82(M)
01/20/84(M)
09/15/93
06/05/89(M)
06/18/87
02/17/82
01/06/84(M)
11/17/82
(NSFHA)
12/23/83(M)
06/18/82(M)
(NSFHA)
10/05/84(M)
(M)
03/04/86(M)
1 1/04/83(M)
09/03/92
(NSFHA)
09/05/90
1 1/04/83(M)
04/02/97
Page 22 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360486#
360484#
361221
360168#
360169#
360221#
360927#
361305B
360676#
361077#
360316#
361078#
360688#
360590#
361518#
360121#
360928#
360053#
361493#
360804#
360976#
361064A
361562#
361029#
360510#
36 1079 A
360093#
360094#
360709#
361185A
360963#
360222#
361142#
360929#
361435A
360296#
360185B
361306A
361192
361190#
360659#
360780#
361030#
Community Name
PLANDOME MANOR, VILLAGE OF
PLANDOME, VILLAGE OF
PLATTEKILL, TOWN OF
PLATTSBURGH, CITY OF
PLATTSBURGH, TOWN OF
on probation eff.:02/l 1/00
PLEASANT VALLEY, TOWN OF
PLEASANTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
POESTENKILL, TOWN OF
POLAND, TOWN OF
POLAND, VILLAGE OF
POMFRET, TOWN OF
POMONA, VILLAGE OF
POMPEY, TOWN OF
POQUOTT, VILLAGE OF
PORT BYRON, VILLAGE OF
PORT CHESTER, VILLAGE OF
PORT DICKINSON, VILLAGE OF
PORT HENRY, VILLAGE OF
PORT JEFFERSON, VILLAGE OF
PORT JERVIS, CITY OF
PORT LEYDEN, VILLAGE OF
PORT WASHINGTON NORTH, VILLAGE OF
PORTAGE,TOWN OF
PORTER, TOWN OF
PORTLAND, TOWN OF
PORTVILLE, TOWN OF
PORTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
POTSDAM, VILLAGE OF
POTSDAM, TOWN OF
POTTER, TOWN OF
POUGHKEEPSIE, CITY OF
POUGHKEEPSIE, TOWN OF
POUND RIDGE, TOWN OF
PRATTSBURG, TOWN OF
PRATTSVILLE, TOWN OF
PREBLE, TOWN OF
PRESTON, TOWN OF
PRINCETOWN, TOWN OF
PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF
PULASKI, VILLAGE OF
PULTENEY, TOWN OF
PUTNAM VALLEY, TOWN OF
County
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/83(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/17/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/16/80(R)
02/15/79(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
03/11/83(R)
07/18/85(R)
12/18/84(R)
04/15/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
08/01/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
01/16/80(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/16/87(R)
03/02/83(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
07/05/83(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/15/83(R)
10/07/83(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/17/78(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/04/86(R)
03/23/84(R)
01/05/84(R)
11/15/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
01/20/84(R)
05/16/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/01/83(R)
07/01/88(R)
12/02/85(R)
09/02/82(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/04/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/02/97
04/02/97
(NSFHA)
04/17/78
09/28/79
01/16/80
02/15/79
1 1/04/83(M)
09/02/81
03/11/83(M)
06/02/99(M)
12/18/84
04/15/82
10/08/82
05/04/98
06/01/82
05/01/84
05/02/77
07/16/87
05/04/98
06/01/78
06/19/85(M)
07/20/98
12/18/84
08/15/83
10/07/83(M)
07/18/83
04/17/78
01/05/96
03/04/86(M)
03/23/84(M)
03/18/84
09/08/99
02/06/91
01/20/84(M)
05/16/83
05/15/85(M)
04/01/83(M)
07/01/88(L)
08/16/95
09/02/82
09/30/77
06/20/01 >
Page 23 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361236#
360879#
360806#
365340#
360095A
360096#
360781B
361346A
361205
36 1548 A
361143#
361614
361265A
360540B
360541B
361466B
361032#
360014#
361144#
361999#
360032#
361360A
361279B
361216B
360660#
360604#
361197
361060#
361467A
361257#
360430#
361372
360805#
360971#
36043 1#
360861#
360829#
360488#
360349B
360542#
360755B
360455
360897#
360862#
361035#
360489#
361186B
Community Name
PUTNAM, TOWN OF
QUEENSBURY, TOWN OF
QUOGUE, VILLAGE OF
RAMAPO, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH, VILLAGE OF
RATHBONE, TOWN OF
RAVENA, VILLAGE OF
READING, TOWN OF
RED CREEK, VILLAGE OF
RED HOOK, TOWN OF
RED HOOK, VILLAGE OF
REDFIELD, TOWN OF
REMSEN, TOWN OF
REMSEN, VILLAGE OF
RENSSELAER FALLS, VILLAGE OF
RENSSELAER, CITY OF
RENSSELAERVILLE, TOWN OF
RHINEBECK, TOWN OF
RHINEBECK, VILLAGE OF
RICHBURG, VILLAGE OF
RICHFIELD SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
RICHFIELD, TOWN OF
RICHFORD, TOWN OF
RICHLAND, TOWN OF
RICHMOND, TOWN OF
RICHMONDVILLE, TOWN OF
RICHMONDVILLE, VILLAGE OF
RICHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
RIDGEWAY,TOWN OF
RIGA, TOWN OF
RIPLEY,TOWN OF
RIVERHEAD, TOWN OF
RIVERSIDE, VILLAGE OF
ROCHESTER, CITY OF
ROCHESTER, TOWN OF
ROCKLAND, TOWN OF
ROCKVILLE CENTRE, VILLAGE OF
RODMAN, TOWN OF
ROME, CITY OF
ROMULUS, TOWN OF
ROOT, TOWN OF
ROSE, TOWN OF
ROSENDALE, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF ROSENDALE
ROSLYN HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
ROSLYN, VILLAGE OF
ROSSIE, TOWN OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/86(R)
07/16/84(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/31/73(R)
1 1/05/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
12/03/82(R)
04/02/82(R)
09/30/76(R)
04/08/83(R)
10/16/84(R)
05/10/85(R)
04/01/91(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/06/84(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/27/82(R)
09/05/84(R)
02/01/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
01/03/86(R)
04/15/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
02/15/78(R)
12/18/84(R)
01/01/88(R)
09/01/87(R)
01/06/84(R)
09/14/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
10/29/82(R)
03/01/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
11/01/78(R)
03/16/83(R)
12/17/87(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/01/88(R)
03/09/84(R)
11/01/85(R)
12/15/83(R)
01/05/84(R)
07/30/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/20/96
08/16/96
05/04/98
02/02/89
1 1/05/82(M)
08/01/78
12/03/82(M)
04/02/82(M)
(NSFHA)
04/08/83(M)
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
04/01/91(L)
05/01/85(M)
09/24/84(M)
01/06/84(M)
03/18/80
08/27/82(M)
09/05/84
02/01/85
01/05/78
01/03/86(M)
04/15/86(M)
05/15/85(M)
07/17/95
12/18/84
01/01/88(L)
09/01/87(L)
01/06/84(M)
09/14/79(M)
06/15/81
(NSFHA)
05/04/98
05/15/80
11/01/78
02/06/91
06/02/93
04/02/97
07/03/85(M)
09/21/98
06/05/85(M)
04/01/88
03/09/84(M)
11/01/85
04/02/97
04/02/97
07/30/82(M)
Page 24 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360740#
360726#
360170#
361036B
360511#
360432#
360033B
360964B
361583#
361428
361121#
360350#
360930#
36093 1#
360351#
36049 1#
360807#
360097#
360098#
360888B
361237A
360591#
360317B
365341#
361167#
360492#
360661#
361358B
360054#
360543#
361398
360273#
360171#
360728#
360727#
360256#
360863#
361504#
361229#
361049#
360932#
361168#
361058#
36074 1#
Community Name
ROTTERDAM, TOWN OF
ROUND LAKE, VILLAGE OF
ROUSES POINT, VILLAGE OF
ROXBURY, TOWN OF
ROY ALTON, TOWN OF
RUSH, TOWN OF
RUSHFORD, TOWN OF
RUSHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
RUSSELL GARDENS, VILLAGE OF
RUSSELL, TOWN OF
RUSSIA, TOWN OF
RUTLAND, TOWN OF
RYE BROOK, VILLAGE OF
RYE, CITY OF
SACKETS HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
SADDLE ROCK, VILLAGE OF
SAG HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
SALAMANCA, CITY OF
SALAMANCA, TOWN OF
SALEM, VILLAGE OF
SALEM,TOWN OF
SALINA, TOWN OF
SALISBURY, TOWN OF
SALTAIRE, VILLAGE OF
SAND LAKE, TOWN OF
SANDS POINT, VILLAGE OF
SANDY CREEK, TOWN OF
SANDY CREEK, VILLAGE OF
SANFORD, TOWN OF
SANGERFIELD, TOWN OF
SANTA CLARA, TOWN OF
SARANAC LAKE, VILLAGE OF
SARANAC, TOWN OF
SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF
SARATOGA, TOWN OF
SARDINIA, TOWN OF
SAUGERTIES, TOWN OF
SAUGERTIES, VILLAGE OF
SAVANNAH, TOWN OF
SAVONA, VILLAGE OF
SCARSDALE, VILLAGE OF
SCHAGHTICOKE, TOWN OF
SCHAGHTICOKE, VILLAGE OF
SCHENECTADY, CITY OF
County
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/84(R)
01/05/84(R)
08/04/87(R)
05/15/85(R)
07/06/79(R)
05/17/82(R)
12/23/83(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
12/19/84(R)
12/19/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/01/80(R)
11/15/85(R)
10/18/83(R)
01/05/78(R)
04/17/78(R)
12/03/79(R)
04/17/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/28/71(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/15/83(R)
10/15/81(R)
05/11/79(R)
06/04/80(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/25/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/15/84(R)
06/15/84(R)
10/21/83(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/10/82(R)
08/06/82(R)
08/15/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
07/16/84(R)
06/11/82(R)
09/30/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/15/84
08/16/95
08/04/87
05/15/85(M)
07/06/79(M)
05/17/82
12/23/83(M)
06/05/85(M)
04/02/97
(NSFHA)
06/02/99
08/18/92
09/28/79
11/01/84
05/02/94
04/02/97
05/04/98
04/17/78
11/01/79
04/17/85(M)
04/17/85(M)
08/16/82
07/03/85(M)
05/04/98
05/15/80
07/20/98
07/17/95
05/11/79(M)
06/04/80
06/05/85
(NSFHA)
01/02/92
03/03/92
08/16/95
08/16/95
10/21/83(M)
09/30/92
08/05/85(M)
08/06/82(M)
08/15/80
06/18/80
07/16/84
12/05/85(M)
09/30/83
Page 25 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361359A
361169#
361198#
361061#
360662#
361158#
360172#
3603 18B
360729#
360034#
360122#
360742#
361328B
360434#
360663#
360493#
360123B
360756#
360757#
361591#
361248#
360124#
361199
360864#
361549
361200
360865#
361258B
360949B
360809#
361307B
360164#
361080B
361502#
361373A
360544#
361506#
360605C
360210#
36021 1#
360144#
361550A
360145#
360592#
Community Name
SCHENEVUS, VILLAGE OF
SCHODACK, TOWN OF
SCHOHARIE, TOWN OF
SCHOHARIE, VILLAGE OF
SCHROEPPEL, TOWN OF
SCHROON, TOWN OF
SCHUYLER FALLS, TOWN OF
SCHUYLER, TOWN OF
SCHUYLERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SCIO, TOWN OF
SCIPIO, TOWN OF
SCOTIA, VILLAGE OF
SCOTT, TOWN OF
SCOTTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SCRIBA, TOWN OF
SEA CLIFF, VILLAGE OF
SEMPRONIUS, TOWN OF
SENECA FALLS, TOWN OF
SENECA FALLS, VILLAGE OF
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
SENECA, TOWN OF
SENNETT, TOWN OF
SEWARD, TOWN OF
SHANDAKEN, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF PINE HILL
SHARON SPRING, VILLAGE OF
SHARON, TOWN OF
SHAWANGUNK, TOWN OF
SHELBY,TOWN OF
SHELDON, TOWN OF
SHELTER ISLAND, TOWN OF
SHERBURNE, TOWN OF
SHERBURNE, VILLAGE OF
SHERIDAN, TOWN OF
SHERMAN, VILLAGE OF
SHERMAN,TOWN OF
SHERRILL, CITY OF
SHOREHAM, VILLAGE OF
SHORTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SIDNEY, TOWN OF
SIDNEY, VILLAGE OF
SILVER CREEK, VILLAGE OF
SILVER SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
SINCLAIR VILLE, VILLAGE OF
SKANEATELES, TOWN OF
County
OTSEGO COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SCHENECTADY
COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/87(R)
08/15/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/02/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/01/84(R)
03/18/85(R)
12/23/83(R)
06/01/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/16/82(R)
02/01/78(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/22/84(R)
06/22/79(R)
09/01/88(R)
01/17/85(R)
01/31/83(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/30/82(R)
12/23/83(R)
12/23/83(R)
02/01/78(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
10/07/83(R)
03/01/78(R)
01/06/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/01/83(R)
01/20/84(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/01/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/01/87(L)
08/15/84
07/05/93
07/05/93
08/02/82
11/16/95
09/30/92
06/20/01 >
08/16/95
03/18/85
12/23/83(M)
06/01/84
05/15/85(M)
09/03/80
06/06/01
04/02/97
1 1/04/83(M)
08/03/81
08/03/81
09/30/88
06/22/84(M)
06/22/79(M)
09/01/88(L)
02/17/89
(NSFHA)
02/01/88(L)
09/30/82
12/23/83(M)
12/23/83(M)
05/04/98
08/24/84(M)
09/10/84(M)
10/07/83(M)
03/01/78
01/06/84(M)
09/15/83
05/04/98
09/24/84(M)
09/30/87
09/30/87
08/01/83
01/20/84(M)
12/01/77
06/01/82
Page 26 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360593#
361589
360690#
361294B
360810#
361040B
361308#
361378A
360899#
360898#
361329A
361564
361242#
360512#
360606D
360782#
360099#
360730#
360691#
360100#
365342#
365343#
361041#
360813#
360156#
360594B
361288B
361527#
360841B
361471B
360433#
365344#
361280A
360125#
360258#
360390#
361157#
360457#
360456#
361118A
360212A
360213A
361145#
360319B
360965#
361170#
360126#
360555#
36073 1#
Community Name
SKANEATELES, VILLAGE OF
SLOAN, VILLAGE OF
SLOATSBURG, VILLAGE OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
SMITHTOWN, TOWN OF
SMITHVILLE, TOWN OF
SMYRNA, TOWN OF
SMYRNA, VILLAGE OF
SODUS POINT, VILLAGE OF
SODUS, TOWN OF
SOLON, TOWN OF
SOLVAY, VILLAGE OF
SOMERS, TOWN OF
SOMERSET, TOWN OF
SOUTH BRISTOL, TOWN OF
SOUTH CORNING, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH DAYTON, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH GLENS FALLS, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH NYACK, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH VALLEY, TOWN OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWN OF
SOUTHAMPTON, VILLAGE OF
SOUTHEAST, TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD,TOWN OF
SOUTHPORT, TOWN OF
SPAFFORD, TOWN OF
SPARTA, TOWN OF
SPECULATOR, VILLAGE OF
SPENCER, TOWN OF
SPENCER, VILLAGE OF
SPENCERPORT, VILLAGE OF
SPRING VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
SPRINGPORT, TOWN OF
SPRINGVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGWATER, TOWN OF
ST. ARMAND, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF BLOOMINGDALE
ST. JOHNSVILLE, CITY OF
ST. JOHNSVILLE, TOWN OF
STAFFORD, TOWN OF
STAMFORD, TOWN OF
STAMFORD, VILLAGE OF
STANFORD, TOWN OF
STARK, TOWN OF
STARKEY, TOWN OF
STEPHENTOWN, TOWN OF
STERLING, TOWN OF
STEUBEN, TOWN OF
STILL WATER, TOWN OF
County
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
GENESEE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/17/82(R)
05/26/78(R)
01/06/82(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/01/78(R)
1 1/04/83(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/15/85(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
02/01/78(R)
05/15/85(R)
01/31/83(R)
09/04/86(R)
02/03/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/25/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
12/02/83(R)
09/28/73(R)
03/09/73(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/01/80(R)
04/30/86(R)
08/27/82(R)
02/06/84(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/31/73(R)
06/01/87(R)
02/06/84(R)
02/27/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
02/05/86(R)
02/19/86(R)
03/16/83(R)
07/16/82(R)
10/01/86(R)
08/01/87(R)
01/21/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
12/03/87(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/17/82
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
04/17/85(M)
05/04/98
1 1/04/83(M)
09/24/84(M)
10/15/85(M)
1 1/02/77
06/02/92
05/15/85
(NSFHA)
09/04/86
02/03/82
05/18/98
10/15/81
01/05/78
08/15/95
11/04/81
12/02/83(M)
05/04/98
05/04/98
09/04/86
05/04/98
08/05/91
04/30/86(M)
08/27/82(M)
02/06/84(M)
05/15/85(M)
05/15/85(M)
08/15/78
08/16/88
06/01/87(L)
02/06/84(M)
07/17/86
08/24/84(M)
02/05/86
09/29/89
03/16/83(L)
07/16/82
10/01/86(L)
08/01/87(L)
12/17/91
05/15/85(M)
12/03/87
08/03/81
05/18/92
09/24/84(M)
08/16/95
Page 27 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360732#
361412#
361429B
361322#
361081B
360880B
360693#
361136B
361323#
360694#
360409#
360127B
361201#
360435#
361042#
360595#
361324B
360297#
360933#
361330#
361551#
360352C
360353B
360494#
360830#
360128#
360881#
361213B
361159#
360842#
361507#
360214#
360259#
360260#
360966#
360556#
360055B
361436A
360677#
361470
360186B
360934#
361296B
361552#
360274A
360376B
361355B
361214
36083 1#
36063 1#
Community Name
STILL WATER, VILLAGE OF
STOCKBRIDGE, TOWN OF
STOCKHOLM, TOWN OF
STOCKPORT, TOWN OF
STOCKTON, TOWN OF
STONY CREEK, TOWN OF
STONY POINT, TOWN OF
STRATFORD, TOWN OF
STUYVESANT, TOWN OF
SUFFERN, VILLAGE OF
SULLIVAN, TOWN OF
SUMMER HILL, TOWN OF
SUMMIT, TOWN OF
SWEDEN, TOWN OF
SYLVAN BEACH, VILLAGE OF
SYRACUSE, CITY OF
TAGHKANIC, TOWN OF
TANNERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
TARRYTOWN, VILLAGE OF
TAYLOR, TOWN OF
THE BRANCH, VILLAGE OF
THERESA, TOWN OF
THERESA, VILLAGE OF
THOMASTON, VILLAGE OF
THOMPSON, TOWN OF
THROOP, TOWN OF
THURMAN, TOWN OF
THURSTON, TOWN OF
TICONDEROGA, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF TICONDEROGA
TIOGA, TOWN OF
TIVOLI, VILLAGE OF
TOMPKINS, TOWN OF
TONAWANDA, CITY OF
TONAWANDA, TOWN OF
TORREY, TOWN OF
TRENTON, TOWN OF
TRIANGLE, TOWN OF
TROUPSBURG, TOWN OF
TROY, CITY OF
TRUMANSBURG, VILLAGE OF
TRUXTON, TOWN OF
TUCKAHOE, VILLAGE OF
TULLY, TOWN OF
TULLY, VILLAGE OF
TOPPER LAKE, VILLAGE OF
TURIN, TOWN OF
TURIN, VILLAGE OF
TUSCARORA, TOWN OF
TUSTEN, TOWN OF
TUXEDO, TOWN OF
County
SARATOGA COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
YATES COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/05/84(R)
09/15/83(R)
04/15/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
10/21/83(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
01/03/85(R)
09/14/79(R)
03/28/80(R)
04/03/85(R)
11/04/83(R)
11/18/83(R)
04/16/82(R)
06/01/84(R)
05/03/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
04/18/83(R)
11/18/81(R)
05/15/85(R)
11/17/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/09/84(R)
08/03/79(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/11/83(R)
05/17/88(R)
05/17/82(R)
08/01/84(R)
11/15/85(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/17/81(R)
12/03/87(R)
05/01/85(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/24/82(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/01/88(R)
05/15/85(R)
02/15/79(R)
04/30/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/30/84(R)
07/01/77(R)
03/01/88(R)
08/27/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/16/95
09/15/83
04/15/86(M)
01/19/83
10/21/83(M)
08/24/84(M)
09/30/81
01/03/85(M)
09/14/79(M)
03/28/80
05/15/86
11/04/83(M)
11/18/83(M)
04/16/82(M)
06/02/99
05/15/86
01/03/86(M)
04/18/83
11/18/81
05/15/85(M)
05/04/98
10/15/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
04/02/97
02/15/91
08/03/79(M)
08/19/86
02/11/83(M)
09/06/96
05/17/82
08/01/84
11/15/85(M)
02/11/83
11/12/82
12/03/87
09/07/98
07/20/84(M)
09/24/82(M)
03/18/80
04/01/88(L)
05/15/85(M)
02/15/79
04/30/86(M)
01/19/83
03/01/87(L)
08/02/94
07/01/77(M)
03/01/88(L)
02/19/87
04/15/82
Page 28 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
361206#
360749B
360866#
360854#
361281#
361044#
360129#
361146#
360056#
360633B
360695
360783#
360558#
361508#
361469#
360495#
360596#
361045#
361056
360758#
360130B
360559#
360560#
360561#
360057#
361057#
361249#
361648
360131B
360733#
360562#
361082C
360187B
361266#
360015#
361187B
361468A
360635#
360261#
360634#
360215#
360216#
361228#
361485
361387#
360223#
361605
360320
360882#
360950B
36095 1#
360636#
Community Name
TYRE, TOWN OF
TYRONE, TOWN OF
ULSTER, TOWN OF
ULYSSES, TOWN OF
UNADILLA, TOWN OF
UNADILLA, VILLAGE OF
UNION SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
UNION VALE, TOWN OF
UNION, TOWN OF
UNIONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
UPPER NYACK, VILLAGE OF
URBANA, TOWN OF
UTICA, CITY OF
VALATIE, VILLAGE OF
VALLEY FALLS, VILLAGE OF
VALLEY STREAM, VILLAGE OF
VAN BUREN, TOWN OF
VAN ETTEN, TOWN OF
VAN ETTEN, VILLAGE OF
VARICK, TOWN OF
VENICE, TOWN OF
VERNON, TOWN OF
VERNON, VILLAGE OF
VERONA, TOWN OF
VESTAL, TOWN OF
VETERAN, TOWN OF
VICTOR, TOWN OF
VICTOR, VILLAGE OF
VICTORY, TOWN OF
VICTORY, VILLAGE OF
VIENNA, TOWN OF
VILLENOVA, TOWN OF
VIRGIL, TOWN OF
VOLNEY, TOWN OF
VOORHEESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WADDINGTON, TOWN OF
WADDINGTON, VILLAGE OF
WALDEN, VILLAGE OF
WALES, TOWN OF
WALLKILL, TOWN OF
WALTON, TOWN OF
WALTON, VILLAGE OF
WALWORTH, TOWN OF
WAMPSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WAPPINGER, TOWN OF
WAPPINGERS FALLS, VILLAGE OF
WARD,TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WARRENSBURG, TOWN OF
WARSAW, TOWN OF
WARSAW, VILLAGE OF
WARWICK, TOWN OF
County
SENECA COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
RENSSELAER
COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ONONDAGA COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ST. LAWRENCE
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/31/79(R)
07/06/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
02/19/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/02/88(R)
03/01/78(R)
07/06/84(R)
10/28/77(R)
01/19/78(R)
02/01/84(R)
12/01/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/05/84(R)
07/17/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/07/88(R)
12/17/87(R)
12/23/83(R)
08/16/88(R)
04/15/88(R)
05/04/89(R)
07/05/77(R)
02/18/83(R)
09/30/83(R)
03/12/96
02/06/84(R)
08/12/85(R)
03/01/84(R)
05/21/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/15/86(R)
05/11/79(R)
08/15/84(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/02/88(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
03/16/83(R)
01/31/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
07/23/82(R)
12/19/84(R)
03/01/84(R)
12/23/83(R)
11/18/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/31/79(M)
07/06/84(M)
05/01/85
02/19/87
09/30/87
09/30/87
12/01/81
09/02/88
09/30/88
07/06/84(M)
(NSFHA)
01/19/78
02/01/84
12/01/82
06/05/85
07/16/97
03/01/84
09/28/79(M)
07/01/88(L)
12/17/87
12/23/83(M)
08/16/88
04/15/88
10/20/99
03/02/98
02/18/83(M)
09/30/83
02/06/84(M)
08/16/95
10/20/99
05/21/82(M)
05/15/85(M)
04/15/82
12/01/82
04/15/86(M)
05/11/79(M)
08/15/84
08/15/79
09/04/86
09/02/88
04/02/91
03/16/83
(NSFHA)
09/22/99
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/01/84
12/23/83(M)
11/18/81
10/15/85
Page 29 of 3 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360637#
361147#
360638#
360734#
360735#
360759#
360760#
360354#
360355#
360563#
360016#
360750#
360377#
361126B
361343#
360867#
360639#
360784B
361462
360785#
360321A
360436#
360437#
360132#
361112A
360157#
360035#
360036#
361616#
361365
360607#
360356#
361649#
360696#
360664#
360262#
360391#
360378
361437
360322B
360017#
360564#
361083B
360146B
361282
365345#
360565#
361160#
361495#
361123A
Community Name
WARWICK, VILLAGE OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WASHINGTONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WATERFORD, TOWN OF
WATERFORD, VILLAGE OF
WATERLOO, TOWN OF
WATERLOO, VILLAGE OF
WATERTOWN, CITY OF
WATERTOWN, TOWN OF
WATERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WATERVLIET, CITY OF
WATKINS GLEN, VILLAGE OF
WATSON, TOWN OF
WAVERLY, TOWN OF
WAVERLY, VILLAGE OF
WAWARSING, TOWN OF
WA WAY AND A, TOWN OF
WAYLAND, TOWN OF
WAYLAND, VILLAGE OF
WAYNE, TOWN OF
WEBB, TOWN OF
WEBSTER, TOWN OF
WEBSTER, VILLAGE OF
WEEDSPORT, VILLAGE OF
WELLS, TOWN OF
WELLSBURG, VILLAGE OF
WELLSVILLE, TOWN OF
WELLSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WESLEY HILLS, VILLAGE OF
WEST ALMOND, TOWN OF
WEST BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF
WEST CARTHAGE, VILLAGE OF
WEST HAMPTON DUNES, VILLAGE OF
USE THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON [#365342] FIRM
WEST HAVERSTRAW, VILLAGE OF
WEST MONROE, TOWN OF
WEST SENECA, TOWN OF
WEST SPARTA, TOWN OF
WEST TURIN, TOWN OF
WEST UNION, TOWN OF
WEST WINFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WESTERLO, TOWN OF
WESTERN, TOWN OF
WESTFIELD, TOWN OF
WESTFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WESTFORD, TOWN OF
WESTHAMPTON BEACH, VILLAGE OF
WESTMORELAND, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, VILLAGE OF
WESTVILLE, TOWN OF
County
ORANGE COUNTY
DUTCHES S COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
SCHUYLER COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CHEMUNG COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ONTARIO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
CHAUTAUQUA
COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/04/86(R)
08/17/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/03/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/15/83(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/04/85(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/04/85(R)
06/08/84(R)
08/01/88(R)
11/02/77(R)
07/30/82(R)
10/16/79(R)
03/22/93(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/18/85(R)
07/17/78(R)
09/16/88(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/01/78(R)
01/03/86(R)
12/08/95(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
01/20/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
07/18/85(R)
07/30/84(R)
07/01/88(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/03/89(R)
05/04/89(R)
06/08/84(R)
10/07/83(R)
06/01/88(R)
02/06/76(R)
03/02/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
02/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/17/88
08/17/79(M)
04/01/81
08/16/95
08/16/95
09/16/81
08/03/81
08/02/93
08/02/93
08/02/82
01/02/80
07/17/78
07/19/00
12/04/85(M)
03/16/83
09/15/83
03/04/85
06/08/84(M)
08/01/88(L)
11/02/77
07/30/82(M)
06/04/87
11/06/91
04/16/97
06/03/86(M)
06/15/81
03/18/85
07/17/78
09/16/88
(NSFHA)
06/01/78
09/28/90
05/04/98
09/30/81
01/20/82
09/30/92
07/18/85
(NSFHA)
07/01/88(L)
07/03/85(M)
08/03/89
05/04/89
06/08/84(M)
10/07/83(M)
06/01/88(L)
05/04/98
03/02/83
09/04/87
06/04/87
02/15/85(M)
Page 30 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
360513#
360438#
361438#
361238B
360935#
361239#
360889B
360566#
360567#
360058B
361331B
360900#
360263#
361047#
360267#
361161#
360357#
360514#
360978#
360736#
361401#
360059#
360060#
360323B
361597#
360901C
361509B
360640#
360786#
360787
361475A
360496#
360868#
361283
361409
361202A
361476#
360952#
360645#
360936#
361289#
361104#
360937#
360568#
360515#
Community Name
WHEATFIELD, TOWN OF
WHEATLAND, TOWN OF
WHEELER, TOWN OF
WHITE CREEK, TOWN OF
WHITE PLAINS, CITY OF
WHITEHALL, TOWN OF
WHITEHALL, VILLAGE OF
WHITESBORO, VILLAGE OF
WHITESTOWN, TOWN OF
WHITNEY POINT, VILLAGE OF
WILLET, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSON TOWN
WILLIAMSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WILLING, TOWN OF
WILLSBORO, TOWN OF
WILMINGTON, TOWN OF
WILNA, TOWN OF
WILSON, TOWN OF
WILSON, VILLAGE OF
WILTON, TOWN OF
WINDHAM, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, VILLAGE OF
WINFIELD, TOWN OF
WIRT, TOWN OF
WOLCOTT, TOWN OF
WOLCOTT, VILLAGE OF
WOODBURY, TOWN OF
WOODHULL, TOWN OF
WOODHULL, VILLAGE OF
WOODRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
WOODSBURGH, VILLAGE OF
WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
WORCESTER, TOWN OF
WORTH, TOWN OF
WRIGHT, TOWN OF
WURTSBORO, VILLAGE OF
WYOMING, VILLAGE OF
YATES, TOWN OF
YONKERS, CITY OF
YORK, TOWN OF
YORKSHIRE, TOWN OF
YORKTOWN, TOWN OF
YORKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
YOUNGSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
County
NIAGARA COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
SARATOGA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
BROOME COUNTY
HERKIMER COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
STEUBEN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SCHOHARIE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
LIVINGSTON COUNTY
CATTARAUGUS
COUNTY
WESTCHESTER
COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
NIAGARA COUNTY
1466
1464
70
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/81(R)
09/15/78(R)
07/25/80(R)
04/17/85(R)
01/02/80(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/03/85(R)
02/01/78(R)
09/15/83(R)
01/06/84(R)
07/20/84(R)
10/17/78(R)
03/01/82(R)
12/24/82(R)
03/18/87(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/15/86(R)
02/01/78(R)
04/17/78(R)
1 1/20/85(R)
06/01/88(R)
05/03/82(R)
02/17/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/25/82(R)
07/23/82(R)
07/06/84(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/01/83(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/01/88(R)
07/06/84(R)
11/18/83(R)
05/25/84(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/15/80(R)
01/20/82(R)
05/25/84(R)
11/15/85(R)
06/01/83(R)
06/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/04/92
07/25/80
07/25/80(M)
04/17/85(M)
01/02/80
07/03/86
06/03/85(M)
05/04/00
05/04/00
01/06/84(M)
07/20/84(M)
10/17/78
03/01/82
12/24/82(M)
05/18/92
11/16/95
01/16/92
04/01/81
11/19/80
08/16/95
03/03/97
09/30/92
05/18/92
07/03/85(M)
06/25/82(M)
06/02/92
07/06/84(M)
03/18/87
04/02/91
(NSFHA)
06/25/76(M)
07/16/97
09/27/91
06/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
11/18/83(M)
02/03/93
08/03/81
09/29/78
01/21/98
01/20/82
05/25/84(M)
08/16/93
05/04/00
06/04/80
Page 31 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
County
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 508
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 2
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 1
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 32 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"NEW YORK
361260 AMBOY, TOWN OF
360439B AMES, VILLAGE OF
361096# BELFAST, TOWN OF
361416A BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
360108# CONQUEST, TOWN OF
361417A DECATUR, TOWN OF
360397B EARLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
361604# FLOWER HILL, VILLAGE OF
361325 FREETOWN, TOWN OF
361623# ISLANDIA, VILLAGE OF
361612# LANSING, VILLAGE OF
361327B MARATHON, TOWN OF
361352B MILFORD, VILLAGE OF
360453# NELLISTON, VILLAGE OF
360838# NICHOLS, VILLAGE OF
361134A OPPENHEIM, TOWN OF
361262B ORWELL, TOWN OF
360454# PALATINE BRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
361263 PALERMO, TOWN OF
361091B PHARS ALIA, TOWN OF
361356# PROSPECT, VILLAGE OF
361421 ROSEBOOM, TOWN OF
361246A WETHERSFIELD, TOWN OF
361267 WILLIAMSTOWN, TOWN OF
County
OSWEGO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ALLEGANY COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
CAYUGA COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
NASSAU COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
SUFFOLK COUNTY
TOMPKINS COUNTY
CORTLAND COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
CHENANGO COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
OTSEGO COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
OSWEGO COUNTY
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 19
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 21
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 21
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
03/01/88(F)
12/04/85(F)
08/06/82(F)
10/21/83(F)
04/04/83(F)
06/18/87(F)
06/05/85(F)
09/1 8/9 1(F)
01/17/75
10/16/70(F)
11/19/87(F)
05/15/85(F)
11/18/83(F)
1 1/03/82(F)
09/29/86(F)
1 1/08/74
02/19/86(F)
11/17/82(F)
03/01/88(F)
08/24/84(F)
07/30/82(F)
06/01/88(F)
07/16/82(F)
03/01/88(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
11/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
11/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
06/18/87(8)
06/05/85(8)
09/18/92
01/17/76
10/16/71
11/19/88
06/15/88(8)
11/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
1 1/08/75
08/04/88(8)
11/04/92(8)
11/04/92(8)
06/15/88(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
06/01/88(8)
11/04/92(8)
1 1/04/92(8)
Page 33 of 33
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370165#
370131A
37000 1#
370457#
370223#
370398#
370404#
370060#
370522#
370284#
370467#
370273#
370007#
370196#
370032#
370044#
370018
3700 14#
370358#
370010#
370189#
370162#
370442#
37001 1#
370288#
370183#
370013#
375346#
370015#
370320#
370504#
370290#
370033#
370293#
370020#
370252#
37049 1#
370453#
370274A
370253#
37023 1#
370436#
37005 1#
370295#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"NORTH CAROLINA
ABERDEEN, TOWN OF
AHOSKIE,TOWN OF
ALAMANCE COUNTY*
ALAMANCE, VILLAGE OF
ALBEMARLE, CITY OF
ALEXANDER COUNTY*
ALLIANCE, TOWN OF
ANDREWS, TOWN OF
ANGIER, TOWN OF
Use Harriett County FIRM panel number 37085c 050d
ANSON COUNTY *
APEX, TOWN OF
ARCHDALE, CITY OF
ASHE COUNTY *
ASHEBORO, CITY OF
ASHEVILLE, CITY OF
ATLANTIC BEACH, TOWN OF
AULANDER, TOWN OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AUTRYVILLE,TOWN OF
AVERY COUNTY *
AYDEN,TOWN OF
BAKERSVILLE, TOWN OF
BALD HEAD ISLAND, VILLAGE OF
BANNER ELK, TOWN OF
BATH, TOWN OF
BAYBORO, TOWN OF
BEAUFORT COUNTY*
BEAUFORT, TOWN OF
BELHAVEN, TOWN OF
BELMONT, CITY OF
BENSON, TOWN OF
Use map panels 145B & 150B of the Johnston County (CID
370138) FIRM dated November 2, 1995.
BERTIE COUNTY
BLACK MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
BLADEN COUNTY *
BLADENBORO, TOWN OF
BLOWING ROCK, TOWN OF
BOGUE, TOWN OF
BOILING SPRING LAKES, CITY OF
BOLTON, TOWN OF
BOONE, TOWN OF
BREVARD, CITY OF
BRIDGETON, TOWN OF
BROOKFORD, TOWN OF
BRUNSWICK COUNTY*
in the National Flood Program
County
MOORE COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
ALEXANDER
COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
HARNETT COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
ASHE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
BERTIE COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
SAMPSON COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
BERTIE COUNTY
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
WATAUGA COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
WATAUGA COUNTY
TRANSYLVANIA
COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/86(R)
05/01/87(R)
12/01/81(R)
12/17/87(R)
12/01/81(R)
02/01/91(R)
08/05/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
02/03/00(R)
06/18/90(R)
03/20/92(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/16/88(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/27/00
01/03/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/28/90(R)
08/04/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
05/15/86(R)
01/15/88(R)
04/08/87(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/04/87(R)
12/01/72(R)
05/16/77(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/13/00(R)
12/04/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/01/89(R)
07/17/86(R)
06/01/78(R)
05/05/97(R)
03/02/89(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/04/87(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/15/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/15/89
05/01/87(L)
12/22/98
12/22/98
09/21/00
07/20/98
08/05/85
02/01/85
06/18/90
12/05/96
07/16/81
10/20/99
07/16/81
05/06/96
11/06/98
01/03/86
02/01/87(L)
09/28/90
08/04/87(M)
09/02/88
05/03/93
01/15/88
02/04/87
12/04/85
02/04/87
10/18/83
01/03/86
11/01/79
10/20/00
12/04/85
05/06/96
09/01/89(L)
07/17/86(M)
01/17/97
06/02/99
12/15/90
07/01/87(L)
01/17/97
03/02/98
05/04/87
12/18/79
08/18/92
Page 1 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370228#
37003 1#
370483#
370034#
370002#
370373#
370036#
370452#
370395#
370039#
370042#
370121C
370046#
375347#
370517#
370275#
370043#
370238#
370391#
370050#
370052#
370465#
37031 1A
370065#
370180#
370159#
370299#
370059#
370487#
370210#
370289#
370301#
37002 IB
370063#
370139#
370531
370302#
370263A
370122#
370233#
Community Name
BRYSON CITY, CITY OF
BUNCOMBE COUNTY *
BURGAW, TOWN OF
BURKE COUNTY *
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
BURNSVILLE, TOWN OF
CABARRUS COUNTY *
CAJUN MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
CALABASH, TOWN OF
CALDWELL COUNTY *
CAMDEN COUNTY *
CANTON, TOWN OF
CAPE CARTERET, TOWN OF
CAROLINA BEACH, TOWN OF
CAROLINA SHORES, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF CAROLINA SHORES HAS ADOPTED
THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY
(370295) FIRM DATED 8-18-92 PANEL 315 AND THE
TOWN OF CALABASH (370395)
FIRM DATED 2-4-88.
CARRBORO, TOWN OF
CARTERET COUNTY *
CARY, TOWN OF
CASWELL BEACH, CITY OF
CATAWBA COUNTY *
CATAWBA, TOWN OF
CEDAR POINT, TOWN OF
USE THE CARTERET COUNTY [370043] FIRM.
CERRO GORDO, TOWN OF
CHADBOURN, TOWN OF
CHAPEL HILL, TOWN OF
CHARLOTTE, CITY OF
CHATHAM COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY *
CHIMNEY ROCK, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF CHIMNEY ROCK HAS ADOPTED
THE RUTHERFORD COUNTY [370217] FIRM DATED
6-1-87.
CHINA GROVE, TOWN OF
CHOCOWINITY, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF CHOCOWINITY HAS ADOPTED THE
BEAUFORT COUNTY (370013) FIRM DATED 2-4-87
PANEL NO 0190B
CHOW AN COUNTY *
CLARKTON, TOWN OF
CLAY COUNTY
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
CLEMMONS, VILLAGE OF
USE FORSYTH COUNTY FIRM PANEL 37067C 242H
CLEVELAND COUNTY*
CLINTON, CITY OF
CLYDE, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
County
SWAIN COUNTY
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
FENDER COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
YANCEY COUNTY
CABARRUS COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
NEW HANOVER
COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
DURHAM COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
CHOW AN COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
SAMSON COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
TYRRELL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/84(R)
08/01/80(R)
01/19/00(R)
06/17/91(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/17/84(R)
05/05/81(R)
03/06/90(R)
02/04/88(R)
08/16/88(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/02/77(R)
04/01/77(R)
05/02/75(R)
01/26/99(R)
06/25/76(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
01/17/86(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
07/26/89(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
04/17/78(R)
08/15/78(R)
03/04/97(R)
02/02/89(R)
02/14/97(R)
12/21/78(R)
06/30/97(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/03/86(R)
04/01/99(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/27/00(R)
10/23/95(R)
07/02/75(R)
12/01/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/04/84
05/06/96
01/19/00
05/07/01
12/22/98
04/17/84
1 1/02/94
08/03/98
02/04/88
08/03/98
12/04/85
01/22/82
10/18/83
09/04/86
02/09/80
11/06/98
12/05/96
04/02/91
09/07/98
09/03/80
02/16/94
07/03/86(M)
09/30/87(M)
08/01/83
01/06/94
07/16/91
07/19/93
09/29/78
07/03/85
07/03/86(M)
04/01/99(L)
10/20/00
07/02/91
01/01/87(L)
12/01/83
08/05/85
Page 2 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370305#
370037#
370089
370053#
370174A
370498#
370321#
370072#
370107#
370443#
370287#
370076#
370078#
370322
370363#
375348#
370307#
370503#
370308#
370136#
370297A
370264#
370083#
370085#
370086#
370496#
37021 1#
37040 1#
370206#
370062#
370087#
370185#
370027B
370382A
370521
Community Name
COLUMBUS COUNTY *
CONCORD, CITY OF
CONETOE, TOWN OF
CONOVER, TOWN OF
CONWAY, TOWN OF
CORNELIUS, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF CORNELIUS HAS ADOPTED THE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY (370158) FIRM DATED 2/3/93
PANELS 0005, 0015, 0020.
CRAMERTON, TOWN OF
CRAVEN COUNTY*
CREEDMOOR, CITY OF
CRESWELL, TOWN OF
CROSSNORE, TOWN OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY *
CURRITUCK COUNTY *
DALLAS, TOWN OF
DANBURY, TOWN OF
DARE COUNTY*
DAVIDSON COUNTY *
DAVIDSON, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF DAVIDSON HAS ADOPTED THE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY (370158) FIRM DATED 2-3-93
PANELS 10, 20, 25
DAVIE COUNTY *
DILLSBORO, CITY OF
DREXEL, TOWN OF
DUNN, CITY OF
DUPLIN COUNTY *
DURHAM COUNTY *
DURHAM, CITY OF
EAST ARCADIA, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF EAST ARCADIA HAS ADOPTED THE
BLADEN COUNTY (370293) FIRM DATED 9-1-89
PANELS 0012 AND 0013.
EAST SPENCER, TOWN OF
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
EDEN, CITY OF
EDENTON, TOWN OF
EDGECOMBE COUNTY *
ELIZABETH CITY, CITY OF
ELIZABETHTOWN, TOWN OF
ELK PARK, TOWN OF
ELM CITY, TOWN OF
County
COLUMBUS COUNTY
CABARRUS COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
GRANVILLE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CURRITUCK COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
STOKES COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
DAVIE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
HARNETT COUNTY
DUPLIN COUNTY
DURHAM COUNTY
DURHAM COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SWAIN COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CHOW AN COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
CAMDEN COUNTY
PASQUOTANK
COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/03/9 1(R)
03/04/80(R)
04/04/00(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/30/97(R)
05/21/92(R)
05/04/87(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/17/82(R)
11/01/84(R)
05/01/94(R)
07/16/87(R)
10/06/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
10/16/97(R)
03/21/80(R)
05/15/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/04/86(R)
07/04/89(R)
02/15/79(R)
01/17/79(R)
06/30/97(R)
07/03/78(R)
05/17/89(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/15/77(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/17/86(R)
04/15/86(R)
10/29/99
Current Effective
Map
06/03/91
11/02/94
(NSFHA)
09/03/80
08/01/87(L)
01/19/00
03/04/80
12/05/97
09/28/90
02/04/87
08/19/86(M)
05/04/00
07/03/95
05/01/94(L)
07/16/87(M)
12/20/00
09/07/00
01/19/00
12/17/93
02/06/91
08/19/86(M)
04/16/90
07/04/89
03/21/00
03/21/00
12/11/81
05/17/89
01/05/78
07/03/85
08/03/81
08/05/85
07/17/86(M)
04/15/86(M)
Page 3 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
370411# ELON COLLEGE, TOWN OF
370047# EMERALD ISLE, TOWN OF
370115A ENFIELD, TOWN OF
370456# ERWIN, TOWN OF
370067# FAIR BLUFF,TOWN OF
370205# FAIRMONT, TOWN OF
370495# FAISON, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF FAISON HAS ADOPTED THE DUPLIN
COUNTY (370083) FIRM DATED 7-4-89 AND THE
SAMPSON COUNTY (370220) FIRM DATED 7-16-91.
THE TOWN OF FAISON HAS ADOPTED THE DUPLIN
COUNTY (370083) FIRM DATED 7-4-89 AND THE
SAMPSON COUNTY (370220) FIRM DATED 7-16-91.
County
ALAMANCE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
HARNETT COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
DUPLIN COUNTY
SAMPSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/05/89(R)
04/01/77(R)
06/25/76(R)
02/28/97(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/30/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/22/98
08/17/98
06/25/76(M)
04/16/90
12/02/92
02/17/93
370412
370190#
370077#
370218B
375349#
370402#
370377#
370497
370197A
370492
370239#
37045 1#
370240#
370099#
370100#
370103#
370104B
370387#
370533
370255#
370105#
370283#
370414#
370212#
370325#
370378#
375351#
370191#
370192#
370535
370111#
370327#
370334#
370200#
370328#
FALCON, TOWN OF
FARMVILLE, TOWN OF
FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF
FOREST CITY, TOWN OF
FORSYTH COUNTY *
FOXFIRE, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY*
FRANKLINTON, TOWN OF
FRANKLINVILLE, TOWN OF
FREMONT, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF FREMONT HAS ADOPTED THE WAYNE
COUNTY (370254) FIRM DATED 9-30-83.
FUQUAY-VARINA, TOWN OF
GAMEWELL, TOWN OF
GARNER, TOWN OF
GASTON COUNTY *
GASTONIA, CITY OF
GATES COUNTY *
GATESVILLE, TOWN OF
GIBSONVILLE, TOWN OF
GODWIN, TOWN OF
GOLDSBORO, CITY OF
GRAHAM COUNTY
GRAHAM, CITY OF
GRANITE FALLS, TOWN OF
GRANITE QUARRY, TOWN OF
GRANVILLE COUNTY*
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENSBORO, CITY OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GRIFTON, TOWN OF
GRIMESLAND, TOWN OF
GUILFORD COUNTY *
HALIFAX COUNTY *
HAMILTON, TOWN OF
HAMLET, CITY OF
HARNETT COUNTY *
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
GATES COUNTY
GATES COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
GRANVILLE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
LENOIR COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
HARNETT COUNTY
10/03/00
04/01/82(R)
10/17/78(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/01/72(R)
02/14/97(R)
05/01/00(R)
07/30/97
07/01/87(R)
05/27/97(R)
11/01/78(R)
02/15/00(R)
07/03/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/01/78(R)
07/16/91(R)
05/13/77(R)
05/15/80(R)
10/03/00
06/01/82(R)
07/17/86(R)
11/19/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/15/78(R)
02/20/97(R)
06/12/95(R)
04/16/71(R)
07/03/78(R)
02/17/82(R)
11/14/00
06/04/80(R)
05/05/81(R)
01/01/87(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/16/90(R)
04/17/89
06/15/84
06/17/86(M)
10/20/98
12/15/89
01/19/01
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
12/05/96
08/16/88
12/19/97
07/20/98
02/16/94
07/16/91
05/13/77(M)
12/22/98
03/16/98
07/17/86(M)
12/22/98
08/03/98
09/15/78
09/28/90
01/06/83
12/05/89
04/30/86
11/20/98
05/18/98
05/05/81
01/01/87(L)
09/06/89
04/16/90
Page 4 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370038#
370265#
370003#
370120#
370367A
370128#
370130#
370188#
370054#
370113#
370343#
370116B
370397#
375352#
370403#
370326#
370312#
370153#
370450#
370478
370133#
370433#
370235#
370313#
370282#
370175B
370178#
370114#
370008#
370138#
370379#
370260A
370469#
370399B
370501#
370319#
375353#
370458#
370304B
370145#
370439#
37024 1#
370170#
370488#
Community Name
HARRISBURG, TOWN OF
HAVELOCK, CITY OF
HAW RIVER, TOWN OF
HAYWOOD COUNTY*
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF
HERTFORD COUNTY
HERTFORD, TOWN OF
HICKORY, CITY OF
HIGH POINT, CITY OF
HILLSBOROUGH, TOWN OF
HOBGOOD, TOWN OF
HOKE COUNTY *
HOLDEN BEACH, TOWN OF
HOLLY SPRINGS, TOWN OF
HOOKERTON, TOWN OF
HOPE MILLS, TOWN OF
HOT SPRINGS, TOWN OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
HUNTERSVILLE, TOWN OF
HYDE COUNTY*
INDIAN BEACH, TOWN OF
INDIAN TRAIL, TOWN OF
IREDELL COUNTY *
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON,TOWN OF
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JAMESTOWN, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
JOHNSTON COUNTY *
JONES COUNTY *
JONESVILLE, TOWN OF
KANNAPOLIS, CITY OF
KENANSVILLE, TOWN OF
KENLY, TOWN OF
KERNERSVILLE, TOWN OF
KILL DEVIL HILLS, CITY OF
KING, CITY OF
KINGS MOUNTAIN, CITY OF
KINSTON, CITY OF
KITTY HAWK, TOWN OF
KNIGHTDALE, TOWN OF
KURE BEACH, TOWN OF
LAKE LURE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF LAKE LURE HAS ADOPTED THE
RUTHERFORD COUNTY [370217] FIRM DATED 6/1/87.
County
CABARRUS COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
VANCE COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
PERQUIMANS
COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
HOKE COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
HYDE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
IREDELL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
ASHE COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
YADKIN COUNTY
CABARRUS COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
DUPLIN COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
STOKES COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
LENOIR COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
NEW HANOVER
COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/30/76(R)
05/04/87(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
07/15/84(R)
08/04/87(R)
01/20/82(R)
11/01/99(R)
07/03/85(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/01/79(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/01/77(R)
03/02/89(R)
05/26/72(R)
12/23/94(R)
1 l/24/99(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/06/90(R)
01/11/95
02/04/87(R)
03/04/85(R)
03/21/80(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/17/89(R)
07/02/87(R)
02/15/85(R)
03/04/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/30/83(R)
08/16/88(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/25/9 1(R)
07/17/86(R)
04/12/01(R)
06/27/00(R)
05/04/73(R)
07/04/89(R)
04/30/86(R)
06/15/82(R)
10/06/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/04/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/04/94
05/04/87
12/22/98
08/17/98
08/04/87(M)
01/20/82
06/02/78
07/03/85
12/08/98
05/18/98
05/15/80
07/01/77(M)
03/02/89
04/02/91
12/05/96
01/20/82
11/04/81
07/05/82
08/03/98
10/16/92
06/08/98
01/17/97
06/22/98
05/17/89
07/02/87(M)
02/15/85
03/04/80
08/16/88
10/20/00
08/16/88
07/01/87(L)
07/17/86(M)
10/20/00
10/20/98
04/02/93
10/20/98
04/30/86(M)
06/15/82
04/02/93
12/19/97
04/02/86
Page 5 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370520#
370069B
370213#
370374#
370222#
37033 1#
3703 17#
37047 1#
370144#
370040#
370081#
370381#
370146#
370147#
370538
375354#
370055#
370098#
370323#
370537
370203#
370090#
370150#
370152#
370207#
370389#
370056#
375355#
370266#
370385#
370154#
370155#
370514#
370310
370208#
370330
370101A
370148#
370390#
370158#
370445#
370529
Community Name
LAKE PARK, VILLAGE OF
ADOPTS UNION COUNTY FIRM DATED 1-17-97 PANEL
NO. 15.
LAKE WACCAMAW, TOWN OF
LANDIS, TOWN OF
LANSING, TOWN OF
LAURINBURG, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY *
LEGGETT, TOWN OF
LELAND, TOWN OF
LENOIR COUNTY *
LENOIR, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LILLINGTON, TOWN OF
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LINCOLNTON, CITY OF
LINDEN, TOWN OF
LONG BEACH, TOWN OF
LONG VIEW, TOWN OF
LOUISBURG, CITY
LOWELL, CITY OF
LUCAMA, TOWN OF
LUMBERTON, CITY OF
MACCLESFIELD, TOWN OF
MACON COUNTY *
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, TOWN OF
MAGGIE VALLEY, TOWN OF
MAIDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
MANTEO, TOWN OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARS HILL, TOWN OF
MARSHALL, TOWN OF
MARTIN COUNTY *
MARVIN, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF MARVIN HAS ADOPTED THE UNION
COUNTY (370234) FIRM DATED
1-17-97.
MATTHEWS, TOWN OF
MAYODAN, TOWN OF
MAYSVILLE, CITY OF
MCADENVILLE,TOWN OF
MCDOWELL COUNTY*
MEBANE, TOWN OF
MECKLENBURG COUNTY *
MIDDLESEX, TOWN OF
The Town of Middlesex has adopted the Nash County
(370278) FIRM dated 1-20-82 panel 175B.
MINERAL SPRINGS, TOWN OF
County
UNION COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
ASHE COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
LENOIR COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
HARNETT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/17/99(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/06/89(R)
03/04/97
10/19/92(R)
01/06/83(R)
08/16/88(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/01/81(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/06/01
03/26/7 1(R)
09/03/80(R)
03/04/88(R)
03/05/90(R)
03/06/01
1 1/05/80(R)
03/25/80(R)
06/01/01(R)
09/02/82(R)
11/16/77(R)
04/17/84(R)
09/03/80(R)
01/05/73(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/19/87(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/16/91(R)
12/28/98(R)
01/11/95
07/18/77(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/15/88(R)
11/05/80(R)
06/01/81(R)
03/19/99(R)
05/17/00(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/03/86(M)
07/03/78
08/16/88
01/03/86
09/06/89
12/20/99
10/15/93
01/06/83
08/16/88
09/07/00
04/16/90
06/22/98
12/01/81
05/03/93
09/03/80
01/19/01
03/05/90
02/17/93
03/18/80
06/30/78
09/02/82
11/16/77
04/17/84
09/03/80
12/04/85
02/05/97
08/19/87
05/15/78
07/16/91
07/18/77
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
02/05/97
12/22/98
01/19/00
Page 6 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
37041 8#
370161#
370236#
370336#
370164#
3703 14#
370048#
370035#
370242#
370226#
370102#
370369#
370419#
37006 IB
375356#
370278#
370167#
370074#
370168#
370012#
370049#
370524
370057#
370466#
370257#
370173#
370513#
370509#
370523
370493#
375357#
370149#
370340#
370342#
370279#
370349#
370108#
370181#
370016#
370184#
370285#
370344#
Community Name
TOWN WILL USE PANELS 90C AND 175C OF THE
UNION COUNTY FIRM
MINNESOTT BEACH, TOWN OF
MITCHELL COUNTY *
MONROE, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY *
MOORESVILLE, TOWN OF
MOREHEAD CITY, TOWN OF
MORGANTON,CITY OF
MORRISVILLE, TOWN OF
MOUNT AIRY,TOWN OF
MOUNT HOLLY, CITY OF
MOUNT OLIVE, TOWN OF
MURFREESBORO,TOWN OF
MURPHY, TOWN OF
NAGS HEAD, CITY OF
NASH COUNTY *
NASHVILLE, TOWN OF
NEW BERN, CITY OF
NEW HANOVER COUNTY*
NEWLAND, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NEWTON GROVE, TOWN OF
NEWTON, TOWN OF
NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, TOWN OF
NORTH WILKESBORO, TOWN OF
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY*
NORTHWEST, CITY OF
USE THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY (370295) FIRM DATED
5-15-95, PANEL 25.
NORWOOD, TOWN OF
OAK ISLAND, TOWN OF
OAK ISLAND CONSISTS OF THE FORMER
COMMUNITIES OF YAUPON BEACH AND LONG
BEACH, NORTH CAROLNA. YAUPON BEACH AND
LONG BEACH CONSOLIDATED TO FORM THE
COMMUNITY OF OAK ISLAND AS OF JULY 1, 1999.
OAKBORO, TOWN OF
OCEAN ISLE BEACH, TOWN OF
OLD FORT, TOWN OF
ONSLOW COUNTY*
ORANGE COUNTY *
ORIENTAL, TOWN OF
ORRUM, TOWN OF
OXFORD, CITY OF
PAMLICO COUNTY
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF MESIC
PANTEGO, TOWN OF
PASQUOTANK COUNTY *
PEACHLAND,TOWN OF
FENDER COUNTY*
County
PAMLICO COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
IREDELL COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
NEW HANOVER
COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
SAMPSON COUNTY
CATAWBA COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
GRANVILLE COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PASQUOTANK
COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
FENDER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/23/85(R)
09/04/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
02/20/97(R)
12/15/89(R)
05/01/80(R)
02/16/77(R)
02/19/87(R)
11/01/78(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/17/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/03/86(R)
11/10/72(R)
06/01/78(R)
01/17/86(R)
06/01/78(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/04/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
02/15/00
09/03/80(R)
06/15/90(R)
02/15/78(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
11/12/98(R)
05/17/00
07/01/99(R)
09/21/00(R)
11/17/72(R)
07/15/88(R)
07/02/87(R)
03/16/81(R)
12/04/85(R)
03/11/97(R)
09/28/90(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
02/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/85
09/02/88(M)
07/05/94
06/01/81
12/15/89
05/01/80
10/18/83
02/19/87
12/05/96
02/19/87
09/28/79
02/17/82
06/01/87(L)
07/03/86(M)
12/20/00
01/20/82
01/17/86
05/04/87
07/20/98
12/04/84
10/18/83
09/03/80
03/06/98
02/18/98
1 1/04/88
09/21/00
09/21/00
04/02/91
02/05/97
1 1/04/92
03/16/81
12/04/85
02/17/93
09/28/90
09/04/85
08/05/85
12/04/85
07/01/87(L)
01/06/95
Page 7 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
3703 15#
370346#
370429#
370337#
370267#
370463#
37009 1#
370160#
370372#
370420#
370249#
370194#
370142#
370485#
3703 18#
370132A
370243#
370198A
370199A
370195#
370324
370516#
370204#
370209#
37004 IB
370341A
370348#
370432#
370117#
370166#
370106B
370156A
370202#
370350#
37020 1#
3702 14#
370092#
Community Name
PERQUIMANS COUNTY
PERSON COUNTY*
PIKEVILLE, TOWN OF
PINE BLUFF, TOWN OF
PINE KNOLL SHORES, TOWN OF
PINEHURST, VILLAGE OF
PINETOPS, TOWN OF
PINEVILLE, TOWN OF
PITT COUNTY *
PITTSBORO, TOWN OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
POLK COUNTY*
POLLOCKSVILLE, TOWN OF
PRINCETON, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF PRINCETON HAS ADOPTED JOHNSTON
COUNTY [370138] FIRM DATED 11-2-95 PANELS 0110,
0115,0140.
PRINCEVILLE, TOWN OF
RAEFORD, CITY OF
RALEIGH, CITY OF
RAMSEUR, TOWN OF
RANDLEMAN, CITY OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY *
RANLO, TOWN OF
RED OAK, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF RED OAK HAS ADOPTED THE NASH
COUNTY (370278)
FIRM DATED 1-20-82, PANEL 80.
RED SPRINGS, TOWN OF
REIDSVILLE, CITY OF
RHODHISS, TOWN OF
RICHLANDS, TOWN OF
RICHMOND COUNTY*
RIVER BEND, TOWN OF
ROANOKE RAPIDS, CITY OF
ROBBINS, TOWN OF
ROBBINSVILLE, TOWN OF
ROBERSONVILLE, TOWN OF
ROBESON COUNTY *
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY*
ROCKINGHAM, CITY OF
ROCKWELL, TOWN OF
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF
County
PERQUIMANS
COUNTY
PERSON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
HOKE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/85(R)
09/14/90(R)
02/14/97(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/25/9 1(R)
03/28/80(R)
03/18/87(R)
01/06/83(R)
02/24/00
08/19/85(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
02/14/97(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
12/19/89
01/22/99(R)
05/01/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
09/06/89(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
12/01/89(R)
07/01/87(R)
02/17/89(R)
05/15/91(R)
09/06/89(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/85
09/14/90
04/01/82
12/15/89(M)
1 1/06/98
12/15/89
03/28/80
03/18/87
09/14/90
10/20/78
08/19/85
01/01/87(L)
08/16/88(M)
10/20/00
04/15/80
06/03/86(M)
11/20/98
03/01/87(L)
07/01/87(L)
07/16/81
06/27/75
02/17/93
09/29/78
07/03/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
09/06/89
08/19/86
09/17/92
12/15/89(M)
12/01/89(L)
07/01/87(L)
02/17/93
05/15/91
09/06/89
05/15/78
01/20/82
THE TOWN OF BATTLEBORO (370088), EDGECOMBE
COUNTY, WAS MERGED INTO THE CITY OF ROCKY
MOUNT EFFECTIVE 7-1-96.
THE TOWN OF BATTLEBORO (370088), EDGECOMBE
COUNTY, WAS MERGED INTO THE CITY OF ROCKY
MOUNT EFFECTIVE 7-1-96.
Page 8 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
37042 1#
370375
375358#
37035 1#
370347#
3702 17#
370219B
370215#
370220#
370143#
370316#
370118
370499#
37048 1#
370392#
370422A
370388#
370441
370064#
370058B
370140#
370110#
370338#
370430#
370028#
370005B
370093#
370216#
370356
370484#
370163#
370530
370472#
370361#
370371A
370135#
370534
Community Name
ROPER, TOWN OF
FORMERLY UNDER WASHINGTON COUNTY
ROSE HILL, TOWN OF
ROSMAN, TOWN OF
ROWAN COUNTY *
ROXBORO, CITY OF
RUTHERFORD COUNTY*
RUTHERFORDTON, TOWN OF
SALISBURY, CITY OF
SAMPSON COUNTY *
SANFORD, CITY OF
SCOTLAND COUNTY *
SCOTLAND NECK, TOWN OF
SELMA, TOWN OF
SEVEN DEVILS, TOWN OF
SEVEN SPRINGS, TOWN OF
SEVERN, TOWN OF
SHALLOTTE, TOWN OF
SHARPSBUG, TOWN OF
SHELBY, CITY OF
SILER CITY,TOWN OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
SNOW HILL, TOWN OF
SOUTHERN PINES, TOWN OF
SOUTHERN SHORES, TOWN OF
SOUTHPORT, CITY OF
SPARTA, TOWN OF
SPEED,TOWN OF
SPENCER, TOWN OF
SPINDALE, TOWN OF
SPRING LAKE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF SPRING LAKE HAS ADOPTED THE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY [370076] FIRM DATED 2-17-82
PANELS 0035B, 0040B, 0075B, 0080B.
SPRUCE PINE, TOWN OF
ST JAMES, TOWN OF
USE BRUNSWICK CO. FIRM PANELS 360E AND 380E.
STALLINGS, TOWN OF
USE THE UNION COUNTY [370234] FIRM
STANLY COUNTY *
STANTONSBURG, TOWN OF
STATESVILLE, CITY OF
STEDMAN, TOWN OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DUPLIN COUNTY
TRANSYLVANIA
COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
PERSON COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
SAMPSON COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
AVERY COUNTY
WATAUGA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
DARE COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
ALLEGHANY
COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
IREDELL COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/85(R)
07/09/98
06/02/72(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/25/9 1(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/16/91(R)
09/06/89(R)
12/16/88(R)
10/28/77(R)
10/20/00(R)
04/13/98(R)
02/17/82(R)
02/01/87(R)
01/03/86(R)
07/03/90(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/20/82(R)
03/04/88(R)
05/13/72(R)
04/15/77(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/04/79(R)
02/14/97(R)
09/02/88(R)
06/27/00(R)
04/05/94(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/01/89(R)
09/28/79(R)
10/03/00
Current Effective
Map
08/05/85
03/02/98
11/01/79
09/14/90
06/01/87(L)
06/17/86(M)
05/15/80
07/16/91
09/06/89
12/16/88
(NSFHA)
10/20/00
(NSFHA)
02/17/82
02/01/87(L)
01/03/86
(NSFHA)
10/23/81
07/02/87(M)
10/20/00
01/20/82
12/15/89
04/02/93
12/18/85
07/03/86(M)
07/02/87
09/29/78
(NSFHA)
05/04/00
09/02/88
01/17/97
09/21/00(M)
09/01/89(L)
09/28/79
Page 9 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370362#
370489#
370437#
375359#
370186#
370364#
370227#
370179#
370137#
370070B
370094#
370082#
370187#
370230#
370434#
370141#
370271 A
370232#
370234#
370298#
370366#
370075#
37043 8#
370648
370532
370006#
370368#
370244#
370084B
370224B
370435#
370515#
370396#
370536
370247#
370268#
3700 17#
37025 1#
370486#
370473#
370254#
Community Name
STOKES COUNTY *
STOKESDALE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF STOKESDALE HAS ADOPTED THE
GUILFORD COUNTY [370111] FIRM DATED 12-5-89
PANEL 001 OB, AND 0002.
STONEWALL, TOWN OF
FORMERLY UNDER PAMLICO COUNTY
SUNSET BEACH, TOWN OF
SURF CITY, TOWN OF
SURRY COUNTY *
SWAIN COUNTY*
SWANSBORO, CITY OF
SYLVA, TOWN OF
TABOR CITY, TOWN OF
TARBORO, TOWN OF
THOMASVILLE, CITY OF
TOPSAIL BEACH, TOWN OF
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY *
TRENT WOODS, TOWNSHIP OF
TRENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
TRYON, TOWN OF
TYRRELL COUNTY *
UNION COUNTY *
VALDESE, TOWN OF
VANCE COUNTY
VANCEBORO, TOWN OF
VANDEMERE, TOWN OF
FORMERLY UNDER PAMLICO COUNTY
VARNAMTOWN, TOWN OF
USE BRUNSWICK COUNTY (CID 370295) FIRM DATED
8/18/92 PANEL NUMBERS 335E 355E.
WADE, TOWN OF
WADESBORO, TOWN OF
WAKE COUNTY *
WAKE FOREST, TOWN OF
WALLACE, TOWN OF
WALNUT COVE, TOWN OF
WALNUT CREEK, CITY OF
WALSTONBURG, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF WALSTONBURG HAS ADOPTED THE
GREENE COUNTY (370378)
FIRM DATED 1-6-83.
WARREN COUNTY*
WARRENTON, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WASHINGTON PARK, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WATAUGA COUNTY *
WATHA, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF WATHA HAS ADOPTED FENDER
COUNTY 370344 FIRM DATED 1-6-95, PANEL 0065.
WAXHAW, TOWN OF
WAYNE COUNTY*
County
STOKES COUNTY
GUILFORD COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
FENDER COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
SWAIN COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
FENDER COUNTY
TRANSYLVANIA
COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
TYRRELL COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
VANCE COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
PAMLICO COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
DUPLIN COUNTY
STOKES COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
WATAUGA COUNTY
FENDER COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/88(R)
05/05/97(R)
12/04/85(R)
11/17/72(R)
05/02/77(R)
12/01/81(R)
07/17/86(R)
10/18/83(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/02/80(R)
05/04/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/18/83(R)
07/03/86(R)
10/22/97(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/04/85(R)
05/30/01(R)
10/03/00
08/19/86(R)
11/15/78(R)
07/03/78(R)
04/02/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
10/19/89(R)
12/28/98(R)
02/01/87(R)
03/06/01
08/19/85(R)
ll/22/76(R)
02/02/77(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/14/97(R)
12/28/98(R)
09/16/91(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/88
12/04/85
08/18/92
01/22/98
09/15/89
12/15/89
10/18/83
12/15/90
07/17/86(M)
02/04/88
09/07/00
01/21/98
03/02/98
09/08/99
08/16/88(L)
08/19/86(M)
08/19/85
01/17/97
07/03/86(M)
07/16/91
08/04/88
12/04/85
08/19/86(M)
11/20/98
12/05/96
04/02/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
09/30/83
06/20/01 >
1 1/02/94
02/04/87
02/04/87
09/21/98
03/09/99
(NSFHA)
03/16/98
Page 10 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
370124#
370269#
3705 18#
370119#
370245#
370525#
370009#
370464#
370095#
370490#
37007 1#
370259#
370157#
370171#
370370#
370270#
370019#
370345#
370365#
375360#
370193B
370424A
370380#
370177#
375361#
37026 1#
370030#
370494#
370246#
Community Name
WAYNESVILLE, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF HAZEL WOOD.
WEAVER VILLE, TOWN OF
WEDDINGTON, TOWN OF
ADOPTS UNION COUNTY (370234) FIRM DATED
1-17-97.
WELDON, TOWN OF
WENDELL, TOWN OF
WESLEY CHAPEL, VILLAGE OF
Use panels 0080 & 0090 of the Union County FIRM dated
1/17/97
WEST JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
WHISPERING PINES, VILLAGE OF
WHITAKERS, TOWN OF
WHITE LAKE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF WHITE LAKE HAS ADOPTED THE
BLADEN COUNTY FIRM [370293] DATED 9-1-89.
WHITEVILLE CITY OF
WILKESBORO, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSTON, TOWN OF
WILMINGTON, CITY OF
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON, CITY OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WINFALL, TOWN OF
WINGATE, TOWN OF
WINSTON-SALEM, CITY OF
WINTER VILLE, TOWN OF
WINTON, TOWN OF
WOODFIN, TOWN OF
WOODLAND, TOWN OF
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, TOWN OF
YANCEY COUNTY *
YAUPON BEACH, TOWN OF
YOUNGSVILLE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF YOUNGSVILLE HAS ADOPTED THE
FRANKLIN COUNTY (370377) FHBM DATED 9-15-78.
ZEBULON, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
HAYWOOD COUNTY
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
ASHE COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
COLUMBUS COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
NEW HANOVER
COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
BERTIE COUNTY
PERQUIMANS
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NEW HANOVER
COUNTY
YANCEY COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
433
413
7
65
20
6
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/06/83(R)
05/06/97(R)
05/03/99(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/01/78(R)
03/12/00(R)
06/04/87(R)
12/15/89(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/08/97(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/19/87(R)
04/17/78(R)
01/12/83(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/18/77(R)
1 1/05/92(R)
02/12/82(R)
08/31/73(R)
02/24/78(R)
07/01/87(R)
02/01/80(R)
03/01/87(R)
1 1/06/70(R)
04/17/84(R)
02/16/77(R)
06/30/97
07/03/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/06/83
05/06/96
04/01/81
12/05/96
01/17/97
08/16/88(M)
12/15/89
04/15/80
08/03/98
08/09/99
09/20/96
11/04/87
01/06/83
07/19/82
08/19/85
07/03/85
07/05/94
10/20/98
02/24/78(M)
07/01/87(L)
05/06/96
03/01/87(L)
07/20/98
04/17/84
04/02/91
(NSFHA)
12/05/96
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
Page 11 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 12 of 14 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
370004#
370407#
370417#
370477#
370394#
37046 1#
370408#
370300#
370455#
370409#
370359#
370225#
370352#
370502#
375350A
370413#
370482#
37043 1#
370125#
370405#
370384
370303
370459#
370309
370454#
370286#
37051 1#
370468#
370258B
370355#
370423A
370406A
370109#
370360
370281A
370256#
370262#
370400#
Community Name
"NORTH CAROLINA
ALLEGHANY COUNTY
ARLINGTON, TOWN OF
BADEN, TOWN OF
BETHANIA, TOWN OF
BOLIVIA, TOWN OF
CAMERON, TOWN OF
CASAR, TOWN OF
CASWELL COUNTY
CHERRYVILLE, TOWN OF
COFIELD, VILLAGE OF
EAST LAURINBURG, TOWN OF
ELKIN, TOWN OF
FAITH, TOWN OF
FOUR OAKS, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
GASTON, TOWN OF
GREEN LEVEL, TOWN OF
HAYESVILLE, TOWN OF
HENDERSON COUNTY *
HIGH SHOALS, CITY OF
LAUREL PARK, TOWN OF
LAWNDALE, TOWN OF
LUMBER BRIDGE, TOWN OF
MOCKSVILLE, TOWN OF
PARKTON, TOWN OF
POLKTON, TOWN OF
RICHFIELD, TOWN OF
ROLESVILLE, TOWN OF
RONDA, TOWN OF
RUTH, TOWN OF
SIMS, TOWN OF
SPENCER MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
STEM, TOWN OF
WAGRAM, TOWN OF
WEBSTER, TOWN OF
WILKES COUNTY *
WILSONS MILLS, TOWN OF
YADKIN COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
County
ALLEGHANY
COUNTY
YADKIN COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
CASWELL COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
DAVIE COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
STANLY COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
GRANVILLE COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
YADKIN COUNTY
2
4
0
Hazard Area
Identified
07/01/77
01/19/79
09/21/00(F)
10/20/98(F)
06/10/77
12/15/89(F)
11/17/78
02/03/78
07/15/88(F)
03/07/80
12/16/88(F)
08/15/78(F)
07/03/78(F)
10/20/00(F)
08/13/76(F)
12/15/78
12/22/98(F)
07/21/81
03/01/82(F)
12/02/80(F)
06/11/76
07/11/75
02/17/89(F)
07/11/75
02/17/89(F)
02/10/78
09/21/00(F)
03/03/92(F)
07/03/86(F)
04/01/77
01/12/79
07/14/78
09/28/90(F)
08/08/75
02/10/78
05/15/91(F)
10/20/00(F)
05/15/91(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/01/78
01/19/80
09/21/01
10/20/99
06/10/78
12/15/90
11/17/79
02/03/79
07/15/89
03/07/81
07/11/76
08/15/78(8)
10/17/76
10/20/01
07/03/78(8)
07/04/88(8)
12/22/99
07/21/82
03/01/82(8)
11/03/79
06/11/77
07/11/76
02/17/90
07/11/76
02/17/90
02/10/79
09/21/01
03/03/93
07/03/86(8)
04/01/78
01/12/80
07/14/79
09/28/91
08/08/76
02/10/79
06/04/87(8)
10/20/01
05/05/79
Page 13 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Hazard Area Date On Which
Identified Sanctions Apply
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 26
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 26
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 14 of 14 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380151
380333#
380055#
380331
380019
380686
380155
380663#
380639#
380156#
380052
380339#
380256#
380695
380661#
380080#
380215#
380116#
380662#
380653#
380682#
380620#
380066#
380005
380640#
380149#
380674#
380007#
380355#
380012#
380260
380622#
380651#
380664
380312#
380017#
Communities Participating in
Community Name
"NORTH DAKOTA
ABERCROMBIE, CITY OF
ADAMS COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
ALEXANDER, CITY IOF
ALMONT, CITY OF
AMENIA, CITY OF
AMENIA, TOWNSHIP OF
ANETA, CITY OF
ANTELOPE, TOWNSHIP OF
ARGUSVILLE, CITY OF
ARTHUR, CITY OF
ASHLEY, CITY OF
BARNES COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWN- SHIPS OF ASHTABULA, ALTA,
BINGHAMPTON, CUBA, DAZEY, ECHELSON, EDNA,
ELLSBURY, GETCHELL, HOBART, NORMA, OAKHILL,
ORISKA, ROGERS, SIBLEY TRAIL, SPRINGY ALE,
STEWART, THORDENSKJOLD, UXBRIDGE, VALLEY,
BARNES, TOWNSHIP OF
BARNEY, CITY OF
BARRIE, TOWNSHIP OF
BATHGATE, CITY OF
BEACH, CITY OF
BELFIELD, CITY OF
BELFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BELMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
BENSON COUNTY*
BERLIN, CITY OF
BEULAH, CITY OF
BILLINGS COUNTY *
BINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BISMARCK, CITY OF
ELAINE, TOWNSHIP OF
BOTTINEAU, CITY OF
BOWMAN COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND
ONLY THE ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF ADELAIDE,
AMOR, BOYESEN, FISHCHBEIN, GASCOYNE, GEM,
GOLDFIELD, GRAINBELT, GRAND RIVER, HALEY,
HART, LADD, LANGBERG, MARION, NEBO, RHAME,
SCRANTON, STAR, STILLWATER, SUNNY SLOPE, AND
W
BOWMAN, CITY OF
BRADDOCK, CITY OF
BRANDENBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIARWOOD, TOWN OF
BRIGHTWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BURLEIGH COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
the National Flood Program
County
RICHLAND COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MCKENZIE COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
BARNES COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BILLINGS COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
BURLEIGH COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
BOWMAN COUNTY
BOWMAN COUNTY
EMMONS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
BURLEIGH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/25/97(R)
01/02/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/30/86(R)
05/02/95(R)
05/04/98(R)
12/11/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/19/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
12/11/85(R)
06/04/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
03/18/97
09/18/86(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/02/95(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/05/78(R)
03/25/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/04/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/04/88(R)
03/29/99
04/01/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
12/11/85(R)
1 1/04/87(R)
09/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
01/02/87
09/18/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
02/19/86(M)
09/30/93
(NSFHA)
06/04/87
09/27/85
09/18/86(M)
02/15/80
09/29/86
03/15/83
08/19/86(M)
09/05/86(M)
06/20/01 >
04/01/86(L)
03/02/82
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
10/20/98
02/04/87
09/28/79
09/30/87
07/04/88
04/01/86(L)
09/27/85
(NSFHA)
1 1/04/87(M)
09/18/85
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380141#
380650#
380676
380638#
380142#
380218
385362
380020#
380081#
380274#
380078#
380648#
380714
380698#
380684
380164
380058
380015B
380219#
380687
380624#
380093
380625#
380082#
380690
380712#
380221#
380701
380117#
380027#
380143#
380150#
380276#
380028#
380026#
380103#
380325#
380657#
380688
380694
380223A
380165
380166
380645#
380224
380636#
380034#
380327#
380366
385363#
380167
380168#
385364#
Community Name
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BUXTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CALEDONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CARPIO, CITY OF
CARRINGTON, CITY OF
CASS COUNTY *
CASSELTON, CITY OF
CAVALIER, CITY OF
CAVALIER, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, CITY OF
CENTER,TOWNSHIP OF
CHIPPEWA INDIAN RESERVATION, TURTLE
MOUNTAIN BAND
CHURCHS FERRY, CITY OF
CLIFFORD, CITY OF
COGSWELL, CITY OF
COLEHARBOR, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COOPERSTOWN, CITY OF
CORINNE, TOWNSHIP OF
COULEE, TOWNSHIP OF
CRARY, CITY OF
CREEL, TOWNSHIP OF
CRYSTAL, CITY OF
DAVENPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
DBS LACS, CITY OF
DEVILS LAKE, CITY OF
DICKEY COUNTY*
DICKINSON, CITY OF
DODGE, CITY OF
DONNYBROOK, CITY OF
DRAYTON, CITY OF
DRAYTON, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNN CENTER, CITY OF
DUNN COUNTY *
DUNSEITH, CITY OF
DURBIN, TOWNSHIP OF
DWIGHT, TOWNSHIP OF
EAGLE, TOWNSHIP OF
EDDY COUNTY
EDGELEY, CITY OF
EDINBURG, CITY OF
EDMORE, CITY OF
ELDORADO, TOWNSHIP OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELM RIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
EMERADO, CITY OF
EMMONS COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
EMPIRE, TOWNSHIP OF
ENDERLIN, CITY OF
ESMOND, CITY OF
FAIRMOUNT, TOWNSHIP OF
FARGO, CITY OF
County
WARD COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
FOSTER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
OLIVER COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
SARGENT COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
GRIGGS COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
DICKEY COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
PENBINA COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
LA MOURE COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
EMMONS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/15/78(R)
02/19/82(R)
03/12/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/30/84(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/05/81(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
07/20/8 1(R)
03/04/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
03/29/99
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
11/05/85(R)
05/15/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
12/11/79(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/15/84(R)
12/11/85(R)
09/30/87(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/04/98(R)
11/24/99
08/04/87(R)
01/22/98
06/01/78(R)
08/12/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
12/01/83(R)
03/01/84(R)
02/19/86(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
04/01/86(R)
11/30/83(R)
01/30/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/19/86(R)
02/04/87(R)
12/11/85(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
04/01/86(R)
04/30/7 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/19/00
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/03/89
07/02/81
07/02/81
09/05/90
06/04/87
06/20/01 >
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
12/11/79(M)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
01/16/81
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
06/02/99
03/01/84
01/19/00
03/24/81
05/01/86(L)
12/01/83
03/01/84
02/19/86(M)
03/18/87(M)
09/29/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
08/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
09/30/92
02/04/87
(NSFHA)
01/15/88
06/20/01 >
04/01/86(L)
02/02/95
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380226
380069#
380136#
380228
380332#
380111
380696
380334
380266
380669
380059
380677#
380035
380070C
380326
380108
380137#
380033#
385365#
380715
380328#
380099
380660
380646
380685
380029#
380084#
380094
380230
380673#
38023 IB
380338#
380259#
380232
380067#
380071#
380621#
380293#
380233A
380132#
380180
380022#
380181#
380672
385366#
380281#
Community Name
FESSENDEN, CITY OF
FLASHER, CITY OF
FOREST RIVER, CITY OF
FORMAN, CITY OF
FORT RANSOM, CITY OF
FORT YATES, CITY OF
FOSTER COUNTY
GACKLE, CITY OF
GARDNER, TOWNSHIP OF
GARFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GARRISON, CITY OF
GASCOYNE, CITY OF
GILBY, CITY OF
GLEN ULLIN, CITY OF
GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
GOODRICH, CITY OF
GRAFTON, CITY OF
GRAND FORKS COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF ALLENDALE, BRENNA,
FALCONER, FERRY, GRAND FORKS, MCKINOCK, RYE,
TURTLE RIVER, AMERICUS AND BLOOMING
GRAND FORKS, CITY OF
GRAND RAPIDS, TOWNSHIP OF
GRANT COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
GREAT BEND, CITY OF
GREENDALE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GRIGGS COUNTY*
HALLIDAY, CITY OF
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HAMPDEN, CITY OF
HANKINSON, CITY OF
HARAM, TOWNSHIP OF
HARVEY, CITY OF
HARWOOD, CITY OF
HARWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
HAZELTON, CITY OF
HAZEN, CITY OF
HEBRON, CITY OF
HERBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
HETTINGER COUNTY*
HETTINGER,CITY OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HOPE, CITY OF
HORACE, CITY OF
HUNTER, CITY OF
IBSEN, TOWNSHIP OF
JAMESTOWN CITY OF
JOLIETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WELLS COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
SARGENT COUNTY
RANSOM COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
FOSTER COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
BOWMAN COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
LAMOURE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
GRIGGS COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
EMMONS COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
HETTINGER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
STEELE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/30/84(R)
04/04/83(R)
05/01/80(R)
12/11/85(R)
09/27/85(R)
1 1/05/85(R)
05/04/98(R)
02/29/80(R)
12/11/85(R)
12/11/85(R)
05/15/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
04/25/97(R)
09/04/86(R)
04/12/89(R)
01/30/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/30/99
01/02/87(R)
05/04/98(R)
03/11/86(R)
03/11/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
12/01/83(R)
02/17/88(R)
04/25/97(R)
05/04/98(R)
01/02/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/30/80(R)
10/15/80(R)
01/30/84(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/19/87(R)
03/04/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/30/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
03/12/86(R)
05/26/72(R)
05/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
04/04/83
12/17/93
(NSFHA)
09/27/85
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/30/87
(NSFHA)
09/04/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
03/15/94
05/01/86(L)
09/27/85
01/02/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/22/98
02/17/88
06/20/01 >
(NSFHA)
01/02/87
08/05/86(M)
08/19/91
12/18/85
(NSFHA)
10/18/83
09/05/79
08/05/86(M)
02/19/87
03/04/87(M)
09/27/85
(NSFHA)
09/27/85
12/04/79
(NSFHA)
03/21/00
05/01/86(L)
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380048
380001#
380644#
380234#
380123#
380030#
380182
380042#
380075
380658
380025B
380184#
380675#
380309
380665
380237
380300#
380032#
380091#
380187#
380691
380004#
380072#
380037
380023#
380262#
380188#
380115A
380680
380133#
380301#
380716#
380307
380689
380311#
380057#
380006#
380294
380076#
380239
380240#
385367#
380138#
380241
380654#
380666#
380148#
380038#
380656
380044#
Community Name
KARLSRUHE, CITY OF
KATHRYN, CITY OF
KELSO, TOWNSHIP OF
KENMARE, TOWNSHIP OF
KENSAL, CITY OF
KILLDEER, CITY OF
KINDRED, CITY OF
LA MOURE, CITY OF
LAKOTA, CITY OF
LAMARS, TOWNSHIP OF
LANGDON, CITY OF
LANSFORD, CITY OF
LANSFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
LIDGERWOOD, CITY OF
LINDAAS, TOWNSHIP OF
LINTON, CITY OF
LISBON, CITY OF
LITCHVILLE, CITY OF
LOGAN COUNTY
MADDOCK, CITY OF
MANDAN, CITY OF
MANVEL, CITY OF
MAPLETON, CITY OF
MAPLETON, TOWNSHIP OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARMARTH, CITY OF
MAX, CITY OF
MAYVILLE, CITY OF
MAYVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
MAZA, CITY OF
MCHENRY COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF FALSEN AND
HENDRICKSON
MCINTOSH COUNTY
MCKINNEY, TOWNSHIP OF
MCLEAN COUNTY*
MEDORA, CITY OF
MERCER COUNTY
MICHIGAN, CITY OF
MILNOR, CITY OF
MINNEWAUKAN, CITY OF
MINOT, CITY OF
MINTO, CITY OF
MOHALL, CITY OF
MOORETON, TOWNSHIP OF
MORAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MORTON COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIP OF CURLEW
MOTT, CITY OF
NANSEN, TOWNSHIP OF
NAPOLEAN,CITY OF
County
MCHENRY COUNTY
BARNES COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
LA MOURE COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CAVALIER COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
EMMONS COUNTY
RANSOM COUNTY
BARNES COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
LA MOURE COUNTY
SLOPE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
TOWNER
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
BILLINGS COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
SARGENT COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
MORTON COUNTY
HETTINGER COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/22/99
07/19/82(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
11/20/79(R)
12/01/83(R)
12/11/85(R)
03/21/80(R)
05/04/98(R)
03/11/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/12/80(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
03/12/86(R)
01/30/84(R)
09/29/86(R)
11/19/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
11/20/79(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/04/98(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
10/01/86(R)
04/22/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/12/89(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
11/24/99
09/18/87(R)
05/04/98(R)
03/01/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
09/29/89(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/27/80(R)
03/18/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
03/17/70(R)
01/16/81(R)
11/15/79(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
12/15/76(R)
03/11/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/19/82
08/05/86(M)
01/19/00
11/20/79(M)
04/17/89
(NSFHA)
03/25/80(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
08/12/80(M)
08/19/87
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/29/86(M)
09/30/92
09/27/85
11/20/79(M)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
09/30/87
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
10/01/86(L)
04/22/80(M)
05/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
07/19/82
09/29/86(M)
01/19/01
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
06/04/87
09/29/89
(NSFHA)
05/27/80(M)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
01/19/00
01/16/81
(NSFHA)
09/18/86(M)
09/18/86(M)
09/30/87
03/04/86
(NSFHA)
02/19/87
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380085#
380683#
380031
380668#
380308
380268#
380693
380191#
380670
380264#
380623#
380643#
380246
380077#
380681
380139#
380073#
380079#
385368D
380194#
380087
380126
380263#
380134#
380016
380655
380092#
380089#
380247#
380261#
380257#
380198
380324#
380097
380199
380678
380098
380101
380104
380105
380641#
380088#
380200
380295
380314
380145#
380014#
Community Name
NECHE, CITY OF
NELSON COUNTY*
NEW ROCKFORD, CITY OF
NEWBORG, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
NOBLE, TOWNSHIP OF
NOGOSEK, TOWNSHIP OF
NOONAN, CITY OF
NORMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
NORMANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH RIVER, CITY OF
NORWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
OAKES, CITY OF
OLIVER COUNTY *
OXBOW, CITY OF
USE THE TOWNSHIP OF PLEASANT 380263 FIRM
PARK RIVER, CITY OF
PARSHALL, CITY OF
PEMBINA COUNTY*
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF CARLISLE, ELORA, AND
NECHE. THE FOLLOWING TOWNSHIPS ARE ALSO
ELIGIBLE: LINCOLN, BATHGATE AND HAMILTON.
Use the Township of Lincoln's FHBM dated 12-15-81.
Effective 3-12-96, INCLUDES THE O
PEMBINA, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PIERCE COUNTY
PINGREE, CITY OF
PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POWERS LAKE, CITY OF
PRAIRIE ROSE, CITY OF
RAMSEY COUNTY*
RANSOM COUNTY *
RAY, CITY OF
RAYMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
REED, TOWNSHIP OF
REGENT, CITY OF
REILES ACRES, CITY OF
RENVILLE COUNTY
REYNOLDS, CITY OF
RHAME, CITY OF
RICHLAND COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY*
ROLETTE, CITY OF
ROLLA, CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
RUGBY, CITY OF
RUTLAND, CITY OF
SARGENT COUNTY
SAUK VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
SAWYER, CITY OF
SCRANTON, CITY OF
County
PEMBINA COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
EDDY COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
DIVIDE COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
DICKEY COUNTY
OLIVER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
MOUNTRAIL COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
RANSOM COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HETTINGER COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
BOWMAN COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SARGENT COUNTY
SARGENT COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
BOWMAN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/80(R)
05/02/95(R)
06/01/98(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/04/98(R)
04/21/81(R)
03/12/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/30/87(R)
11/10/89(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/18/86(R)
11/19/87(R)
11/02/77(R)
05/13/80(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
02/03/82(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/29/85(R)
05/02/95(R)
09/27/85(R)
04/29/80(R)
10/01/86(R)
10/15/80(R)
01/30/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
01/27/88(R)
06/01/98(R)
03/29/99
07/15/85(R)
01/30/84(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
01/30/84(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/15/84(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/80(M)
01/19/01
06/01/98(L)
01/16/87
01/19/00
07/16/80
(NSFHA)
04/21/81(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/87
09/27/85
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/87(M)
05/01/80
03/18/86(M)
11/19/87(M)
06/30/78
05/13/80(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/03/82
07/19/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/20/01 >
09/27/85
04/29/80(M)
10/01/86(L)
12/18/85
(NSFHA)
09/30/87
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/16/86(M)
03/16/92
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
09/30/87
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
380329
380204
380321#
380330
380114#
380010#
380647#
380700#
380315#
380106A
380697
380258#
385369#
380642#
380692
380251
380252
380127
380671#
380207
380118#
380208#
380721
380147#
380699#
380130
380679#
380041
380062
380002#
380051
380310
380322#
380317
380100#
380652#
380340#
380659
380254#
380135#
Community Name
SENTINEL BUTTE, CITY OF
SHERWOOD, CITY OF
SIOUX COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS
SLOPE COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF BUCKLIN, CARROLL,
CASH, CEDAR CREEK, CONNER, CRAWFORD, DOVRE,
HARPER, HUGHES, HUME, MINERAL SPRINGS,
MOORD, MOUND, PEACEFUL VALLEY, RAINY BUTTE,
SAND CREEK, SHEETS, SLOPE, CENTER, SUNSHINE
SOLEN, CITY OF
SOURIS, CITY OF
SOUTH HEART, CITY OF
SPIRIT LAKE TRIBE
SPRITWOOD LAKE CITY, CITY OF
ST. JOHN, CITY OF
STANDING ROCK INDIAN RESERVATION
STANLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
STARK COUNTY *
STAV ANGER, TOWNSHIP OF
STEELE COUNTY
STEELE, CITY OF
STRASBURG, CITY OF
STREETER, CITY OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SYKESTON, CITY OF
TAYLOR, CITY OF
THOMPSON, CITY OF
THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD
RESER
TIOGA, CITY OF
TOWNER COUNTY*
TRAILL COUNTY*
TRENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
TUTTLE, CITY OF
UNDERWOOD, CITY OF
VALLEY CITY, CITY OF
VELVA, CITY OF
VELVA, TOWNSHIP OF
VIKING, TOWNSHIP OF
VILLARD, TOWNSHIP OF
WAHPETON,CITY OF
WALBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
WALCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
WALDO, CITY OF
WALHALLA, CITY OF
WALSH COUNTY *
County
GOLDEN VALLEY
COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
SLOPE COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
ROLETTE COUNTY
SIOUX COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
STEELE COUNTY
KIDDER COUNTY
EMMONS COUNTY
STUTSMAN COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
WELLS COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
GRAND FORKS
COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
MCKENZIE COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MOUNTRAIL COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
TOWNER COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
KIDDER COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
BARNES COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
TRAILL COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
PEMBINA COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/11/86(R)
09/22/99
01/16/87(R)
03/25/86(R)
06/04/87(R)
03/18/86(R)
02/19/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
09/30/82(R)
10/01/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
07/05/82(R)
1 1/05/7 1(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
04/25/97(R)
08/19/86(R)
11/12/85(R)
08/12/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
08/23/00
04/05/88(R)
05/04/98(R)
05/04/98(R)
1 1/04/87(R)
0 1/03/0 1(R)
01/30/84(R)
09/28/84(R)
08/15/77(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/18/87(R)
06/04/87(R)
05/04/87(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/11/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
01/16/87
(NSFHA)
06/04/87(M)
03/18/86(M)
02/19/86(M)
06/20/01 >
09/30/82
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
02/02/95
09/28/82
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
08/12/80(M)
06/19/85
04/05/88
01/19/01
(NSFHA)
1 1/04/87(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/16/88
01/19/00
01/19/00
09/04/86(M)
01/19/00
06/04/87
05/04/87(M)
09/29/86(M)
(NSFHA)
04/15/80
05/01/86(L)
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TWPS. AND
ORGANIZED TWPS. OF ACTON, ARDOCH,
CLEVELAND, FARMINGTON, FERTILE, FOREST
RIVER, GOLDEN, HARRISTON, KENSINGTON,
LAMPTON, MARTIN, MEDFORD, OAKWOOD, OPS,
PRAIRIE CENTRE, PULASKI, RUSHFORD, ST.
ANDREWS SAUTER, SHEPERD, SILV
385370# WARD COUNTY *
INCLUDES ALL UNORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS AND THE
ORGANIZED TOWNSHIPS OF BADEN, CARBONDALE,
CARPIO, FOXHOLM, FREEDOM, HARRISON,
KIRKELIE, NEDROSE, NEW PRAIRIE, SAWYER,
SUNDRE, AND WILLIS
380265# WARREN, TOWNSHIP OF
380344# WATFORD, CITY OF
380024# WEST FARGO, CITY OF
380074A WHITE EARTH, CITY OF
380146 WILLIAMS COUNTY
380319# WILLISTON, CITY OF
380011# WILLOW CITY, CITY OF
380337 WILLOW CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
380065 WILTON, CITY OF
380212 WIMBLEDON, CITY OF
380213# WING, CITY OF
380267# WISER, TOWNSHIP OF
380053A WISHEK, CITY OF
380667 WYNDMERE, TOWNSHIP OF
380068# ZAP, CITY OF
County
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
Current Effective
Map
WARD COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MCKENZIE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MOUNTRAIL COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
MCKENZIE COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
BOTTINEAU COUNTY
MCHENRY COUNTY
BURLEIGH COUNTY
MCLEAN COUNTY
BARNES COUNTY
BURLEIGH COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
10/15/76(R)
01/19/00
05/01/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
04/17/78(R)
10/01/86(R)
05/02/95(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/18/87(R)
04/25/97(R)
04/25/97(R)
08/19/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/11/85(R)
07/16/79(R)
05/01/86(L)
09/30/87
02/02/95
10/01/86(L)
05/02/95
09/01/87(L)
09/28/79
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/80(M)
12/18/84
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
07/16/79
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 288
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 277
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 85
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 68
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 11
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 1
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"NORTH DAKOTA
380154 ANAMOOSE, CITY OF
380703# BRINSMADE, CITY OF
380702# BROCKET, CITY OF
380170# FORDVILLE, CITY OF
380704 KNOX, CITY OF
380705# OBERON, CITY OF
380196# PORTAL, CITY OF
380306# STAFFORD,TOWNSHIP OF
380250# STANTON, CITY OF
380706 WARWICK, CITY OF
380707 YORK, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
MCHENRY COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
WALSH COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
BURKE COUNTY
RENVILLE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
BENSON COUNTY
0
2
1
5
5
Hazard Area
Identified
10/14/80(F)
12/20/00(F)
06/04/76
12/20/00(F)
12/20/00(F)
05/26/81(F)
03/01/87(F)
04/02/76
12/20/00(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/17/89(8)
12/20/01
06/04/77
12/20/01
12/20/01
09/06/89(8)
12/02/87(W)
04/02/77
12/20/01
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390675#
390001#
390205#
390295#
390523#
390329#
390758#
390508#
390206#
390015#
390347#
390296#
390138A
390435B
390642#
390739A
390241A
390684#
390603A
390207#
390242
390759#
390007#
390147#
390010#
39001 1#
390446#
390698#
390760#
390016#
39076 1#
390454#
390602#
390348#
390481
390886#
390159#
390524#
390066#
390595#
390093#
390509#
390094#
390876#
390096#
390095#
390025#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"OHIO
ABERDEEN, VILLAGE OF
ADAMS COUNTY *
ADDYSTON, VILLAGE OF
ADENA, VILLAGE OF
AKRON, CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA, VILLAGE OF
ALLEN COUNTY *
ALLIANCE, CITY OF
AMBERLEY, VILLAGE OF
AMESVILLE, VILLAE OF
AMHERST, CITY OF
AMSTERDAM, VILLAGE OF
ANSONIA, VILLAGE OF
ANTWERP, VILLAGE OF
APPLE CREEK, VILLAGE OF
AQUILLA, VILLAGE OF
ARCADIA, VILLAGE OF
ARCANUM, VILLAGE OF
ARCHBOLD, VILLAGE OF
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
ARLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
ASHLAND COUNTY
ASHLAND, CITY OF
ASHLEY, VILLAGE OF
ASHTABULA COUNTY *
ASHTABULA, CITY OF
ASHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ATHALIA, VILLAGE OF
ATHENS COUNTY*
ATHENS, CITY OF
AUGLAIZE COUNTY *
AURORA, CITY OF
AVON LAKE, CITY OF
AVON, CITY OF
BAINBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
BALTIC, VILLAGE OF
BALTIMORE, VILLAGE OF
BARBERTON, CITY OF
BATAVIA, VILLAGE OF
BAY VIEW, VILLAGE OF
BAY VILLAGE, CITY OF
BEACH CITY, VILLAGE OF
BEACHWOOD, CITY OF
BEAVERCREEK, CITY OF
BEDFORD HEIGHTS, CITY OF
BEDFORD, CITY OF
BELLAIRE, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
BROWN COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
AUGLAIZE COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/15/83(R)
03/14/78
08/15/83(R)
12/01/83(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
11/15/89(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/29/89(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/01/83(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/17/89(R)
12/07/84(R)
03/01/87(R)
12/03/93(R)
01/04/85(R)
02/23/90(R)
02/02/84(R)
01/01/88(R)
01/02/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
02/01/80(R)
06/18/85(R)
09/01/83(R)
10/31/91(R)
03/28/80(R)
09/06/89(R)
05/17/90(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
07/12/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/19/88(R)
12/17/91(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/15/77(R)
12/01/77(R)
12/19/80(R)
04/20/79(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/17/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
11/02/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/83
03/03/78
08/15/83
12/01/83
02/18/81
05/17/82
11/15/89
07/05/82
09/30/80
09/29/89
08/01/80
12/01/83
07/01/87(L)
08/19/85(M)
05/03/93
12/07/84(M)
03/01/87(L)
12/03/93
01/04/85(M)
12/18/86
(NSFHA)
01/01/88(L)
09/01/83
04/21/99
01/02/81
02/01/80
09/30/99
09/01/83
05/02/91
03/28/80
09/06/89
05/17/90
1 1/02/77
05/17/93
(NSFHA)
06/15/88(M)
12/17/91(M)
01/16/81
09/02/94
09/15/77
12/06/99
12/19/80(M)
04/20/79(M)
08/02/82
09/17/80
01/02/81
11/02/83
Page 1 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390194#
390429#
390340#
390487#
390604#
390762#
390567#
390682#
390097#
390695#
390674A
390500B
390568#
390168#
390074#
390208#
390004#
390749#
390504
390257#
390583
390734#
390098#
390160#
390510#
390379#
390026#
390099#
390102#
390101#
390100#
390027#
390407#
390034#
390380#
390580
390728#
390882#
390090#
390037#
390605#
390199#
390258
390430B
39065 1#
390200#
39046 1#
390368
390511#
390169#
390369#
Community Name
BELLBROOK, CITY OF
BELLE VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
BELLEFONTAINE, CITY OF
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BELLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BELMONT COUNTY*
BELPRE, CITY OF
BENTLEYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BEREA, CITY OF
BERGHOLZ, VILLAGE OF
BETHESDA, VILLAGE OF
BETTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BEVERLY, VILLAGE OF
BEXLEY, CITY OF
BLANCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
BLUE ASH, CITY OF
BLUFFTON, VILLAGE OF
BOSTON HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
BOTKINS, VILLAGE OF
BOWERSTON, VILLAGE OF
BOWLING GREEN, CITY OF
BRATENAHL, VILLAGE OF
BRECKSVILLE, CITY OF
BREMEN, VILLAGE OF
BREWSTER, VILLAGE OF
BRIARWOOD BEACH, VILLAGE OF
BRIDGEPORT, VILLAGE OF
BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, CITY OF
BROOK PARK, CITY OF
BROOKLYN HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
BROOKLYN, CITY OF
BROOKSIDE, VILLAGE OF
BROOKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BROWN COUNTY *
BRUNSWICK, CITY OF
BRYAN, CITY OF
BUCHTEL, VILLAGE OF
BUCKEYE LAKE, VILLAGE OF
BUCYRUS, CITY OF
BUTLER COUNTY *
BUTLER, VILLAGE OF
BYESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CADIZ, VILLAGE OF
CALDWELL, CITY OF
CALEDONIA, VILLAGE OF
CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF
CAMDEN, VILLAGE OF
CAMPBELL, CITY OF
CANAL FULTON, VILLAGE OF
CANAL WINCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
CANFIELD, CITY OF
County
GREENE COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
PREBLE COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/77(R)
11/02/90(R)
07/16/84(R)
10/17/78(R)
03/16/89(R)
02/04/88(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/01/79(R)
12/14/79(R)
07/13/90(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/80(R)
11/15/78(R)
1 1/06/97(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/20/95(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/04/87(R)
03/19/84(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/02/82(R)
07/31/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/01/79(R)
03/02/79(R)
06/01/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/01/79(R)
02/04/88(R)
10/15/81(R)
05/09/77
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/06/84(R)
03/01/95(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/03/86(R)
10/05/89(R)
11/15/89(R)
02/17/89(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/04/87(R)
02/04/87(R)
03/18/86(R)
06/28/84(R)
09/03/79(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/04/80(R)
11/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/77
11/02/90
07/16/84
10/17/78
09/02/93
02/04/88
08/01/80
08/01/80
06/01/79(M)
12/14/79(M)
09/18/87(M)
09/30/88(M)
08/01/80
04/21/99
08/05/91
08/01/80
09/20/95
02/18/81
(NSFHA)
03/04/87
(NSFHA)
06/15/81
11/15/89
12/15/90
07/31/81(M)
08/19/85
02/01/79
03/02/79(M)
06/01/79(M)
06/15/81
1 2/04/8 1(M)
02/04/88
10/15/81
01/13/78
0 1/02/8 1(M)
(NSFHA)
03/01/95(L)
08/15/84
07/03/86
01/21/98
11/15/89
02/17/89
(NSFHA)
09/04/87(M)
02/04/87
02/17/89
04/15/81
(NSFHA)
07/05/82
04/21/99
11/01/78
Page 2 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390512#
390652B
390590#
390606#
390763#
390048B
390653
390607#
390393#
390307#
390408#
390103#
390055#
390191#
390017#
390608#
390186#
390209
390482#
390067#
390910
390644B
390056B
390210#
390447#
390405#
390732#
390483
390820A
390875#
390065#
390105
390104#
39021 1#
390678#
390764#
390525#
390489#
390326#
390291#
390394
390076#
390077#
390170#
390012#
390550
390440A
390823
Community Name
CANTON, CITY OF
CARDINGTON, VILLAGE OF
CAREY, VILLAGE OF
CARLISLE, VILLAGE OF
CARROLL COUNTY *
CARROLLTON, VILLAGE OF
CASTALIA, VILLAGE OF
CEDARVILLE, VIL
CELINA, CITY OF
CENTERBURG, VILLAGE OF
CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
CHAGRIN FALLS, VILLAGE OF
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY *
CHARDON, VILLAGE OF
CHAUNCEY, VILLAGE OF
CHESAPEAKE, VILLAGE OF
CHESHIRE, VILLAGE OF
CHEVIOT, CITY OF
CHILLICOTHE, CITY OF
CHILD, VILLAGE OF
CHIPPEWA LAKE, VILLAGE OF
CHIPPEWA-ON-THE-LAKE, VILLAGE OF
CHRISTIANSBURG, VILLAGE OF
CINCINNATI, CITY OF
CIRCLEVILLE, CITY OF
CLARINGTON, VILLAGE OF
CLARK COUNTY*
CLARKSBURG, VILLAGE OF
CLARKSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CLAY CENTER, VILLAGE OF
CLERMONT COUNTY *
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF
CLEVELAND, CITY OF
CLEVES, VILLAGE OF
CLIFTON, VILLAGE OF
CLINTON COUNTY*
CLINTON, VILLAGE OF
CLYDE, CITY OF
COAL GROVE, VILLAGE OF
CO ALTON, VILLAGE OF
COLD WATER, VILLAGE OF
COLUMBIANA COUNTY *
COLUMBIANA, CITY OF
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
CONNEAUT, CITY OF
CONVOY, VILLAGE OF
CORNING, VILLAGE OF
CORTLAND, CITY OF
County
STARK COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/06/83(R)
11/02/84(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/03/84(R)
09/28/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
02/24/8 1(R)
03/18/86(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/18/81(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/03/85(R)
01/04/85(R)
01/17/86(R)
10/18/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
01/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/24/00(R)
05/25/84(R)
11/02/84(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
11/16/83(R)
07/02/87(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/09/99
06/20/80(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/01/78(R)
02/01/84(R)
07/08/80(R)
09/16/88(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/02/79(R)
07/05/83(R)
05/02/91(R)
02/02/84(R)
03/05/90(R)
09/30/88(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/15/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/05/92(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/06/83
11/02/84(M)
10/15/85
04/03/84
09/28/90
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/80
03/18/86(M)
01/06/82
11/18/81
07/02/80
08/03/98
01/04/85(M)
01/17/86
10/18/83
08/15/83
(NSFHA)
06/03/86
08/15/89
05/25/84(M)
11/02/84(M)
10/15/82
09/30/99
11/16/83
10/20/98
(NSFHA)
11/10/78
06/20/80(M)
11/16/94
(NSFHA)
08/01/78
02/01/84
07/02/80
09/16/88(M)
07/02/80
04/02/79
12/15/89
05/02/91
(NSFHA)
03/05/90
09/30/88(M)
04/21/99
02/15/80
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
Page 3 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390765#
390089#
390399#
390745#
39081 1#
390091#
390575#
39044 1#
390187#
390824#
390766#
390526#
390654#
390584#
390308C
390712#
390137#
390409#
390609#
390143#
390144#
390146#
390148#
390049B
390005#
390183#
390542#
39043 IB
390298#
390543#
390705#
390673#
390513#
390078#
390079B
390655B
390313#
390462#
390826#
390827#
390656A
390610#
390213#
390350#
390299#
Community Name
COSHOCTON COUNTY*
COSHOCTON, CITY OF
COVINGTON, VILLAGE OF
CRAIG BEACH, VILLAGE OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY*
CRESTLINE, VILLAGE OF
CRESTON, VILLAGE OF
CROOKSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CROWN CTY, VILLAGE OF
CUMBERLAND, VILLAGE OF
CUYAHOGA COUNTY *
CUYAHOGA FALLS, CITY OF
CUYAHOGA HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
CYGNET, VILLAGE OF
DANVILLE, VILLAGE OF
DARBYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
DARKE COUNTY *
DAYTON, CITY OF
DE GRAFF, VILLAGE OF
DEFIANCE COUNTY *
DEFIANCE, CITY OF
DELAWARE COUNTY *
DELAWARE, CITY OF
DELLROY, VILLAGE OF
DELPHOS, CITY OF
DELTA, VILLAGE OF
DENNISON, VILLAGE OF
DEXTER CITY, VILLAGE OF
DILLONVALE, VILLAGE OF
DOVER, CITY OF
DRESDEN, CITY OF
DUBLIN, CITY OF
EAST CANTON, VILLAGE OF
EAST LIVERPOOL, CITY OF
EAST PALESTINE, CITY OF
EAST SPARTA, VILLAGE OF
EASTLAKE, CITY OF
EATON, CITY OF
EDGERTON, VILLAGE OF
EDON, VILLAGE OF
ELIDA, VILLAGE OF
ELMORE, VILLAGE OF
ELMWOOD PLACE, VILLAGE OF
ELYRIA, CITY OF
EMPIRE, VILLAGE OF
County
COSHOCTON
COUNTY
COSHOCTON
COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
DEFIANCE COUNTY
DEFIANCE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PREBLE COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/87(R)
12/18/86(R)
09/02/82(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/01/92(R)
10/05/84(R)
10/17/94(R)
03/04/88(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/17/89(R)
04/02/86(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/02/82(R)
08/24/84(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/29/89(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/17/85(R)
08/02/90(R)
03/04/85(R)
10/18/83(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
08/19/87(R)
08/05/91(R)
05/15/84(R)
12/18/86(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/15/83(R)
07/16/87(R)
05/15/86(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/16/79(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
05/01/81(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/04/97
10/07/92
04/01/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
10/15/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/04/87
12/18/86
09/02/82
04/17/78
04/01/92(L)
07/02/92
05/03/93
03/04/88
07/05/83
02/17/89
04/02/86
02/18/81
06/15/81
08/02/82
08/24/84(M)
09/30/99
09/29/89
09/29/96
01/17/85
08/02/90
03/04/85
04/21/99
04/21/99
08/19/87(M)
08/05/91
05/15/84
12/18/86
08/19/87(M)
09/15/83
07/16/87
05/15/86
04/21/99
02/16/79(M)
07/18/83
09/04/87(M)
05/01/81(M)
02/18/81
04/15/81
09/01/87(L)
10/06/78
12/13/74
04/01/82
12/18/84
07/02/80
10/15/82
Page 4 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390828#
390795#
390153#
390107#
390214#
390195#
390215#
390158#
390038#
390657#
390108#
390164#
390829A
390244#
390900#
390263#
390468B
390395#
39061 1#
390245#
390484#
390167#
390556#
390576#
390309#
390490#
390182#
390171#
390149#
390092#
390185#
390188#
390310#
390109#
390455#
390593#
390190#
390013#
390658#
390612#
390035
39041 1#
390686A
390469#
390536#
390470B
390442#
390277#
390735#
390381#
390018A
Community Name
ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF
ENON, VILLAGE OF
ERIE COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF MARGARETTA
EUCLID, CITY OF
EVENDALE, CITY OF
FAIRBORN, CITY OF
FAIRFAX, VILLAGE OF
FAIRFIELD COUNTY *
FAIRFIELD, CITY OF
FAIRLAWN, CITY OF
FAIRVIEW PARK, CITY OF
FAYETTE COUNTY *
FAYETTE, VILLAGE OF
FINDLAY, CITY
FLETCHER, VILLAGE OF
FLORIDA, VILLAGE OF
FORT JENNINGS, VILLAGE OF
FORT RECOVERY, VILLAGE OF
FORT SHAWNEE, VILLAGE OF
FOSTORIA, CITY OF
FRANKFORT, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY*
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FREDERICKSBURG, VILLAGE OF
FREDERICKTOWN, VILLAGE OF
FREMONT, CITY OF
FULTON COUNTY *
GAHANNA, CITY OF
GALENA, VILLAGE OF
GALION, CITY OF
GALLIA COUNTY*
GALLIPOLIS, CITY OF
GAMBIER, VILLAGE OF
GARFIELD HEIGHTS, CITY OF
GARRETTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GATES MILLS, VILLAGE OF
GEAUGA COUNTY*
GENEVA, CITY OF
GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, VILLAGE OF
GENOA, VILLAGE OF
GEORGETOWN, VILLAGE OF
GERMANTOWN, VILLAGE OF
GETTYSBURG, VILLAGE OF
GILBOA, VILLAGE OF
GIRARD, CITY OF
GLANDORF, VILLAGE OF
GLENFORD, VILLAGE OF
GLENMONT, VILLAGE OF
GLENWILLOW, VILLAGE OF
GLORIA GLENS PARK, VILLAGE OF
GLOUSTER, VILLAGE OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/13/92
04/17/87(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/29/86(R)
11/19/80(R)
11/15/79(R)
04/17/89(R)
03/15/79(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/04/83(R)
06/01/95(R)
02/08/99
12/04/84(R)
09/04/96(R)
12/17/91(R)
03/09/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/05/83(R)
11/05/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/09/75
09/29/89(R)
08/01/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/29/89(R)
07/05/83(R)
0 1/30/8 1(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
03/05/90(R)
04/03/78(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
02/01/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/03/82(R)
07/06/84(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/04/85(R)
05/16/95(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/09/84(R)
08/02/95(R)
12/15/90(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/18/75
Current Effective
Map
1 1/03/78
04/17/87
09/20/95
08/17/81
09/29/86
08/18/92
11/15/79
04/17/96
03/15/79
01/16/81
02/04/83(M)
06/01/95(L)
09/15/78
04/05/88
03/15/95
12/05/95
03/09/84(M)
06/06/01
08/15/84
07/01/87(L)
09/24/84(M)
04/21/99
03/04/87
05/03/93
02/18/81
04/17/84
09/29/89
04/21/99
04/21/99
06/19/85
09/29/89
07/05/83
0 1/30/8 1(M)
01/06/88
03/05/90
04/03/78
1 1/04/88
02/01/80
12/04/79
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
07/02/81
01/04/85(M)
05/16/95
07/02/80
03/09/84(M)
08/02/95
12/15/90
02/18/81
08/19/85
05/21/76
Page 5 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390613#
390614#
390585#
390315#
390172#
390330#
390374#
390193#
390219#
390139#
390282B
390173#
390174#
390436B
390198#
390554#
390676
390204#
390039#
390264A
390767#
390699#
390831 A
390082A
390255#
390220#
39033 1#
390332#
390333#
390708A
390776#
390145#
390677#
390110#
390268
390175#
390269#
390272#
390265
390659#
390028C
390276#
390278#
390887#
390537#
390884#
390660#
390770#
390154#
390111#
390221#
39074 1#
Community Name
GNADENHUTTEN, VILLAGE OF
GRAFTON, VILLAGE OF
GRAND RAPIDS, VILLAGE OF
GRAND RIVER, VILLAGE OF
GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS, CITY OF
GRANVILLE, VILLAGE OF
GREEN CAMP, VILLAGE OF
GREENE COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF SUGARCREEK
GREENHILLS, VILLAGE OF
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWICH, VILLAGE OF
GROVE CITY, CITY OF
GROVEPORT, VILLAGE OF
GROVER HILL, VILLAGE OF
GUERNSEY COUNTY *
HAMDEN, VILLAGE OF
HAMERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HAMILTON COUNTY *
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HAMLER, VILLAGE OF
HANCOCK COUNTY *
HANGING ROCK, VILLAGE OF
HANOVER, VILLAGE OF
HANOVERTON, VILLAGE OF
HARRISON COUNTY *
HARRISON, CITY OF
HARTFORD, VILLAGE OF
HEATH, CITY OF
HEBRON, VILLAGE OF
HEMLOCK, VILLAGE OF
HENRY COUNTY *
HICKSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HIGGINSPORT, VILLAGE OF
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, CITY OF
HIGHLAND, VILLAGE OF
HILLIARD, CITY OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HOCKING COUNTY *
HOLGATE, VILLAGE OF
HOLLAND, VILLAGE OF
HOLLOW AY, VILLAGE OF
HOLMES COUNTY *
HOLMESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HOPEDALE, VILLAGE OF
HUBBARD, CITY OF
HUBER HEIGHTS, CITY OF
HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
HURON COUNTY*
HURON, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
INDIAN HILL, CITY OF
IRONDALE, VILLAGE OF
County
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
VINTON COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
DEFIANCE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
HOCKING COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/18/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/02/83(R)
07/16/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/17/82(R)
02/04/87(R)
04/01/81(R)
09/01/93(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/01/84(R)
09/01/83(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/17/89(R)
09/29/89(R)
11/17/78(R)
06/01/82(R)
07/15/77(R)
02/28/97
08/05/91(R)
09/01/83(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/06/76
04/03/85(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
12/15/82(R)
08/19/87(R)
12/05/95(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/15/83(R)
06/01/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
11/16/90(R)
05/29/79(R)
09/22/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/15/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/18/92(R)
08/15/78(R)
12/11/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/03/78(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
05/01/85(R)
10/18/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/18/86
07/02/80
05/02/83
09/20/95
04/21/99
05/17/82
02/05/87
08/18/92
09/01/93(L)
09/29/89
09/30/88(M)
04/21/99
04/21/99
08/19/86(M)
02/17/89
09/29/89
(NSFHA)
10/18/95
02/15/85(M)
04/15/77
08/05/91
09/01/83
02/01/87(L)
09/01/87(L)
04/22/77
04/03/85
08/10/79(M)
1 1/02/83
12/15/82
08/19/87(M)
12/05/95
08/01/87(L)
09/15/83
09/30/95
(NSFHA)
04/21/99
09/04/86(M)
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
10/06/00
09/18/85(M)
12/15/90
12/15/90
(NSFHA)
08/15/78
10/15/85
09/30/80
08/01/87(L)
04/03/78
02/18/81
05/01/85
10/18/83
Page 6 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390327#
390290#
390292#
390019B
390881#
390294#
390014#
390165#
390008A
390259#
390334#
39047 1C
390456#
390253#
390412#
390279#
390743A
39070 1#
390810#
390616#
390306#
390375#
39077 1#
390888
390527
390341A
390112#
390161#
390835#
390273#
390325#
390557#
390270A
390084B
390618#
390619B
390328#
390006#
390222
390494B
390085B
390691#
390223#
390382A
390772#
390274#
390366#
390346#
390351#
390812#
390202#
390009A
Community Name
IRONTON, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON, CITY OF
JACKSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
JAMESTOWN, VILLAGE OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE VIILLAGE OF BRILLIANT.
JEFFERSON, VILLAGE OF
JEFFERSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
JEROMESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
JEWETT, VILLAGE OF
JOHNSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
KALIDA, VILLAGE OF
KENT, CITY OF
KENTON, CITY OF
KETTERING, CITY OF
KILLBUCK, CITY OF
KIPTON, VILLAGE OF
KIRKERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
KIRTLAND HILLS, VILLAGE OF
KIRTLAND, CITY OF
KNOX COUNTY *
LA RUE, VILLAGE OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKELINE, VILLAGE OF
LAKEMORE, VILLAGE OF
LAKEVIEW, VILLAGE OF
LAKEWOOD, CITY OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LAURA, VILLAGE OF
LAURELVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEESBURG, VILLAGE OF
LEETONIA, VILLAGE OF
LEXINGTON, VILLAGE OF
LIBERTY CENTER, VILLAGE OF
LICKING COUNTY *
LIMA, CITY OF
LINCOLN HEIGHTS, CITY OF
LINDSEY, VILLAGE OF
LISBON, VILLAGE OF
LOCKBOURNE, VILLAGE OF
LOCKLAND, VILLAGE OF
LODI, VILLAGE OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LOGAN, CITY OF
LONDON,CITY OF
LORAIN COUNTY*
LORAIN, CITY OF
LORDSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
LORE CITY, VILLAGE OF
LOUDONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
County
LAWRENCE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
HOCKING COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
ALLEN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HOCKING COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/05/83(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/03/86(R)
02/01/84(R)
01/05/84(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/05/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/04/88(R)
05/17/82(R)
10/05/84(R)
03/15/78(R)
04/17/96(R)
10/15/80(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/22/78(R)
09/02/82(R)
10/05/84(R)
02/01/80(R)
10/27/93(R)
02/04/87(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/04/88(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/01/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
05/11/95(R)
11/16/95(R)
09/29/89(R)
03/15/79(R)
12/06/93
08/19/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/17/86(R)
12/01/83(R)
02/15/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/04/86(R)
07/07/75
05/15/85(R)
01/17/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
10/14/91(R)
08/15/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/17/89(R)
08/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/05/83
08/19/85
06/01/84
06/03/86(M)
02/01/84
01/05/84
08/01/79
03/05/90
09/01/86(L)
07/04/88
05/17/82
10/05/84(M)
03/15/78
04/17/96
10/15/80
12/15/90
09/22/78(M)
09/02/82
10/05/84(M)
02/01/80
07/19/82
02/04/87
09/20/95
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
02/01/78
04/17/89
03/15/95
07/16/76
09/29/89
03/15/79
05/21/76
08/19/87(M)
02/27/8 1(M)
06/17/86(M)
12/01/83
02/15/79
(NSFHA)
09/01/78(M)
09/30/88(M)
04/21/99
09/04/86
05/28/76
05/15/85
01/17/86
07/02/87
09/30/88
03/03/92
03/01/79
02/17/89
08/01/87(L)
Page 7 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390516#
390068#
390569#
390620#
390570#
390359#
390661C
390271#
390113#
390750#
390571#
390225#
390773#
390316#
390839B
390051 A
390367#
390421 A
390052#
390002#
390477#
390457#
390114#
390896#
390748#
390572#
390774#
390029#
390548#
390559#
390517#
390573#
390360
390115
390116D
390247
390422B
390538#
390057A
390378#
390383B
390387#
390671
390317#
3903 18#
390392#
Community Name
LOUISVILLE, CITY OF
LOVELAND, CITY OF
LOWELL, VILLAGE OF
LOWELLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LOWER SALEM, VILLAGE OF
LUCAS COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON
LUCAS, VILLAGE OF
LYNCHBURG, VILLAGE OF
LYNDHURST, CITY OF
MACEDONIA, CITY OF
MACKSBURG, VILLAGE OF
MADEIRA, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MADISON, VILLAGE OF
MAGNETIC SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
MAGNOLIA, VILLAGE OF
MAHONING COUNTY *
MALTA, VILLAGE OF
MALVERN, VILLAGE OF
MANCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
MANSFIELD, CITY OF
MANTUA, VILLAGE OF
MAPLE HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MARBLE CLIFF, VILLAGE OF
MARBLEHEAD, VILLAGE OF
MARIETTA, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY*
MARTINS FERRY, CITY OF
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MASON, CITY OF
MASSILLON, CITY OF
MATAMORAS, VILLAGE OF
MAUMEE, CITY OF
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MAYFIELD, VILLAGE OF
MCCOMB, VILLAGE OF
MCCONNELSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MCDONALD, VILLAGE OF
MECHANICSBURG, VILLAGE OF
MEDINA COUNTY *
MEDINA, CITY OF
MEIGS COUNTY *
MENDON, CITY OF
MENTOR, CITY OF
MENTOR-ON-THE-LAKE, CITY OF
MERCER COUNTY *
County
HOLMES COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/15/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/03/79(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
03/16/83(R)
09/01/93(R)
09/06/89(R)
04/23/82(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
11/15/79(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/01/00(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/15/79(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/03/95(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/03/86(R)
07/05/84(R)
09/17/80(R)
08/02/95(R)
02/01/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
02/04/87(R)
07/05/83(R)
04/02/86(R)
03/15/79(R)
07/05/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
03/28/80(R)
06/10/80(R)
12/24/76(R)
06/18/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/08/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/30/88(R)
11/16/95(R)
11/15/85(R)
12/01/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/06/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/05/00
09/01/78
08/15/80
09/28/90
1 1/05/80
10/06/00
09/01/93(L)
09/06/89
04/23/82(M)
02/04/81
08/15/80
02/20/81
02/06/91
12/04/79
07/01/00(L)
09/01/86(L)
02/15/79
09/01/87(L)
07/03/95
08/01/78
01/03/86
07/05/84
09/17/80
04/21/99
02/01/84
09/15/83
02/04/87
07/05/83
04/02/86
06/18/82
07/05/82
01/06/88
10/06/00
(NSFHA)
03/16/88
(NSFHA)
07/01/87(L)
08/08/80(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/15/83
09/30/88(M)
11/16/95
(NSFHA)
09/20/95
08/01/79
06/06/01
Page 8 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390840#
390398#
390413#
390841#
390117#
390192#
390388#
390040#
390715
390155B
390662#
390227#
390586#
390280#
390689A
390041#
390842#
39079 1#
390518#
390300#
390528#
390404#
390042#
390283A
390396A
390775#
390228#
390581C
390414#
390118#
390420#
390868#
390561#
390070#
390229#
390621A
39031 1#
390248#
390424#
390843#
390275#
390425#
390794
Community Name
METAMORA, VILLAGE OF
MIAMI COUNTY *
MIAMISBURG, CITY OF
MIDDLE POINT, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, CITY OF
MIDDLEFIELD, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLEPORT, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLETOWN, CITY OF
MID VALE, CITY OF
MILAN, VILLAGE OF
MILFORD CENTER, VILLAGE OF
MILFORD, CITY OF
MILLBURY, VILLAGE OF
MILLERSBURG, VILLAGE OF
MILLERSPORT, VILLAGE OF
MILLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MINERAL CITY, VILLAGE OF
MINERVA PARK, VILLAGE OF
MINERVA, VILLAGE OF
MINGO JUNCTION, CITY OF
MOGADORE, VILLAGE OF
MONROE COUNTY *
MONROE, VILLAGE OF
MONROEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MONTEZUMA, VILLAGE OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MONTGOMERY, CITY OF
MONTPELIER, VILLAGE OF
MORAINE, CITY OF
MORELAND HILLS, VILLAGE OF
MORGAN COUNTY*
MORROW COUNTY*
MORROW, VILLAGE OF
MOSCOW, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT HEALTHY, CITY OF
MOUNT ORAB, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MT. BLANCHARD, CITY OF
MT. GILEAD, VILLAGE OF
MUNROE FALLS, CITY OF
MURRAY CITY, VILLAGE OF
MUSKINGUM COUNTY*
MUTUAL, VILLAGE OF
County
FULTON COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
HOLMES COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
HOCKING COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/16/95(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/02/79(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/01/78(R)
06/02/95(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/02/83(R)
12/15/90(R)
02/01/91(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/30/97
06/15/79(R)
07/05/82(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/03/79(R)
02/15/84(R)
08/05/91(R)
08/01/87(R)
06/11/97
12/15/81(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/04/87(R)
10/15/81(R)
06/01/79(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
04/01/92(R)
08/01/78(R)
03/15/77(R)
12/15/78(R)
01/16/01
08/02/82(R)
02/05/86(R)
08/19/87(R)
05/16/94(R)
11/15/78(R)
06/03/88(R)
05/13/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/16/95
06/08/98
01/15/83
09/24/84(M)
08/17/81
09/30/88
09/29/78
03/02/79(M)
(NSFHA)
09/01/78(M)
06/02/95
11/16/94
05/02/83
12/15/90
02/01/91(L)
02/04/81
10/06/78
(NSFHA)
07/05/82
01/06/83
04/02/82
02/15/84
08/05/91
08/01/87(L)
05/28/76
09/29/96
03/02/93
06/04/87(M)
10/15/81
06/01/79(M)
1 1/02/90
04/01/92(L)
08/01/78
03/15/77
03/02/93
05/07/76
08/02/82
02/05/86
09/02/93
05/16/94
11/15/78
09/05/90
(NSFHA)
Page 9 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390266#
390520#
390020#
390722#
390641#
390497
390062A
390847A
390448#
390848#
390443#
390284#
390140
390043#
390463#
390545#
390071#
390709
390663#
390335#
390544#
390539#
390230#
390850B
390540#
390428#
390587#
39023 1#
390521#
390232#
390679A
390889
390058C
390120#
390742#
390352#
390121#
390529#
390286#
390433#
390122#
390437#
390353#
390176#
390869
390672#
390478
390737#
39075 1#
390361#
390577#
Community Name
NAPOLEON, CITY OF
NAVARRE, VILLAGE OF
NELSONVILLE, CITY OF
NEVADA, VILLAGE OF
NEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEW BOSTON, VILLAGE OF
NEW CARLISLE, CITY OF
NEW CONCORD, VILLAGE OF
NEW HOLLAND, VILLAGE OF
NEW KNOXVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEW LEXINGTON, VILLAGE OF
NEW LONDON, VILLAGE OF
NEW MADISON, VILLAGE OF
NEW MIAMI, VILLAGE OF
NEW PARIS, VILLAGE OF
NEW PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF
NEW RICHMOND, VILLAGE OF
NEW STRAITSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEW WATERFORD, VILLAGE OF
NEW ARK, CITY OF
NEWCOMERSTOWN, TOWN OF
NEWTON FALLS, CITY OF
NEWTOWN, VILLAGE OF
NEY, VILLAGE OF
NILES, CITY OF
NOBLE COUNTY*
NORTH BALTIMORE, VILLAGE OF
NORTH BEND, VILLAGE OF
NORTH CANTON, CITY OF
NORTH COLLEGE HILL, CITY OF
NORTH HAMPTON, VILLAGE OF
NORTH KINGSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NORTH LEWISBURG, VILLAGE OF
NORTH OLMSTED, CITY OF
NORTH PERRY, VILLAGE OF
NORTH RIDGEVILLE, CITY OF
NORTH ROY ALTON, CITY OF
NORTON, CITY OF
NORWALK, CITY OF
OAK HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
OAKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
OAKWOOD, VILLAGE OF
OBERLIN, CITY OF
OBETZ, VILLAGE OF
OHIO CITY, VILLAGE OF
OLMSTED FALLS, CITY OF
ONTARIO, VILLAGE OF
ORANGE, VILLAGE OF
ORANGEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
OREGON, CITY OF
ORRVILLE, CITY OF
County
HENRY COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
SCIOTO COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
AUGLAIZE COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
PREBLE COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
DEFIANCE COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/04/85(R)
07/05/82(R)
01/17/86(R)
01/07/98(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/26/83(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/29/98
01/18/80(R)
10/03/94(R)
09/02/82(R)
05/01/88(R)
07/06/84(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
01/02/87(R)
05/01/79(R)
04/17/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
04/15/77(R)
01/02/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
12/15/83(R)
06/01/92(R)
06/01/78(R)
01/01/88(R)
09/02/82(R)
10/18/83(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/07/84(R)
09/05/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/17/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
02/15/79(R)
04/01/82(R)
03/02/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/18/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/13/83(R)
06/01/79(R)
01/30/84(R)
02/04/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
03/15/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/02/95
07/05/82
01/17/86
01/07/98
09/29/78
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
09/08/78
09/30/99
09/06/89
09/02/82
05/01/88(L)
(NSFHA)
02/18/81
04/15/81
01/02/87
11/19/80
(NSFHA)
05/01/87(L)
09/07/00
01/02/87
08/01/78
12/15/83
06/01/92(L)
06/01/78
01/01/88(L)
09/02/82
10/18/83
1 1/03/82
09/29/86
09/24/84(M)
(NSFHA)
12/07/84(M)
07/02/92
07/16/79
02/17/93
09/17/80
01/16/81
02/15/79
04/01/82
03/02/79(M)
01/05/96
06/18/80
04/21/99
(NSFHA)
06/01/79(M)
(NSFHA)
02/04/83(M)
09/04/87(M)
10/06/00
05/03/93
Page 10 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390892#
390432#
390362#
390472#
390473A
39073 1#
390319A
390474#
390124#
390123#
390336#
390777#
390438#
390439#
390624#
390530#
390125#
390778#
390320B
390588#
390730A
390445#
390162#
390450#
39045 1#
390582#
390400#
390625#
390203#
390287A
390370
390389#
390434#
390506#
390664#
390453C
390754#
390498#
390626#
390030#
390460#
390700#
390377#
390600#
390465#
390853#
390390#
390499C
390458A
390301#
390234#
Community Name
OSTRANDER, VILLAGE OF
OTTAWA COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF CATAWBA ISLAND
OTTAWA HILLS, VILLAGE OF
OTTAWA, VILLAGE OF
OTTOVILLE, VILLAGE OF
OXFORD, CITY OF
PAINESVILLE, CITY OF
PANDORA, VILLAGE OF
PARMA HEIGHTS, CITY OF
PARMA, CITY OF
PATASKALA, VILLAGE OF
PAULDING COUNTY *
PAULDING, VILLAGE OF
PAYNE, VILLAGE OF
PEMBERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PENINSULA, VILLAGE OF
PEPPER PIKE, CITY OF
PERRY COUNTY *
PERRY, VILLAGE OF
PERRYSBURG, CITY OF
PERRYSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PICKAWAY COUNTY *
PICKERINGTON, VILLAGE OF
PIKE COUNTY*
PIKETON, VILLAGE OF
PIONEER, VILLAGE OF
PIQUA, CITY OF
PLAIN CITY, VILLAGE OF
PLEASANT CITY, VILLAGE OF
PLYMOUTH, VILLAGE OF
POLAND, VILLAGE OF
POMEROY, VILLAGE OF
PORT CLINTON, CITY OF
PORT JEFFERSON, VILLAGE OF
PORT WASHINGTON, VILLAGE OF
PORTAGE COUNTY*
PORTAGE, VILLAGE OF
PORTSMOUTH, CITY OF
POWELL, VILLAGE OF
POWHATAN POINT, VILLAGE OF
PREBLE COUNTY *
PROCTOR VILLE, VILLAGE OF
PROSPECT, VILLAGE OF
PUT-IN-BAY, VILLAGE OF
PUTNAM COUNTY *
QUAKER CITY, VILLAGE OF
RACINE, VILLAGE OF
RARDEN, VILLAGE OF
RAVENNA, CITY OF
RAYLAND, VILLAGE OF
READING, CITY OF
County
DELAWARE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
SCIOTO COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
PREBLE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
SCIOTO COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/03/91(R)
10/17/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/15/79(R)
08/01/87(R)
02/16/79(R)
02/02/77(R)
11/01/78(R)
08/17/81(R)
08/17/81(R)
02/02/83(R)
12/05/89(R)
09/30/88(R)
02/02/96(R)
08/02/82(R)
03/02/79(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
12/15/78(R)
05/02/83(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/05/91(R)
01/15/88(R)
01/15/88(R)
09/30/88(R)
1 1/09/79(R)
12/15/83(R)
01/05/79(R)
07/30/99
07/21/78(R)
07/05/83(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/02/88(R)
01/15/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/15/83(R)
03/04/85(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/12/82(R)
08/01/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
09/30/77(R)
12/05/90(R)
02/17/89(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/17/89(R)
09/04/87(R)
11/16/83(R)
12/18/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/21/99
11/04/92
10/06/00
01/03/86
08/01/87(L)
01/03/97
02/02/77
11/01/78
08/17/81
08/17/81
02/02/83
01/05/96
09/30/88
02/02/96
08/02/82
03/02/79(M)
08/17/81
09/27/91
12/15/78(M)
05/02/83
08/01/87(L)
09/30/99
08/05/91
01/15/88
01/15/88
12/15/90
1 1/09/79(M)
12/15/83
02/17/89
05/21/76
(NSFHA)
07/05/83
09/30/77
09/02/88
01/15/88
09/18/87(M)
04/15/82
08/15/83
04/21/99
07/05/83
01/17/91
08/01/84
02/04/87
09/30/77
12/05/90
02/17/89
08/15/83
04/17/89(M)
09/04/87(M)
11/16/83
12/18/86
Page 11 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390855#
390177#
390476#
390126#
390724
390549#
390879#
390036#
390578#
390692#
390416#
390885#
390665C
390397
395372#
390645B
390003#
390646#
390480#
390589#
390813A
390342B
390880#
390670#
390627#
390086#
390628#
390486#
390156B
390261#
390496#
390857
390371#
390858#
390779#
390128#
390045
390384#
39003 1#
390129#
390236#
390151
390355#
390354#
390503#
Community Name
REMINDERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
REYNOLDSBURG, CITY OF
RICHLAND COUNTY*
RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF
RICHMOND, VILLAGE OF
RICHWOOD, VILLAGE OF
RIO GRANDE, VILLAGE OF
RIPLEY, VILLAGE OF
RITTMAN, CITY OF
RIVERLEA, VILLAGE OF
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
ROAMING SHORES, VILLAGE OF
ROCK CREEK, VILLAGE OF
ROCKFORD, VILLAGE OF
ROCKY RIVER, CITY OF
ROGERS, VILLAGE OF
ROME, VILLAGE OF
ROSEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
ROSS COUNTY *
ROSSFORD, CITY OF
ROSWELL, VILLAGE OF
RUS SELLS POINT, VILLAGE OF
RUSSIA, VILLAGE OF
RUTLAND, VILLAGE OF
SABINA, VILLAGE OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SALINEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SANDUSKY COUNTY *
SANDUSKY, CITY OF
SCIO, VILLAGE OF
SCIOTO COUNTY *
SCOTT, VILLAGE OF
SEBRING, VILLAGE OF
SENCECAVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SENECA COUNTY *
SEVEN HILLS, CITY OF
SEVEN MILE, VILLAGE OF
SEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SHADYSIDE, VILLAGE OF
SHAKER HEIGHTS, CITY OF
SHARONVILLE,CITY OF
SHAWNEE HILLS, VILLAGE OF
SHEFFIELD LAKE, CITY OF
SHEFFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
County
SUMMIT COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
ASHTABULA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
SCIOTO COUNTY
PAULDING COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/17/90(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
01/04/85(R)
07/06/84(R)
04/17/95(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/18/83(R)
12/31/76(R)
06/09/99(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/16/88(R)
07/07/78(R)
02/01/86(R)
09/17/71(R)
12/01/91(R)
10/18/83(R)
01/17/91(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
05/02/83(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/04/87(R)
09/30/88(R)
11/02/90(R)
11/15/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/05/91(R)
01/17/79(R)
07/05/77(R)
03/04/87(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/28/78(R)
08/11/78(R)
09/15/89(R)
05/17/90(R)
06/01/79(R)
08/24/81(R)
04/15/86(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/02/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/01/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/02/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/17/90
04/21/99
04/02/91
01/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/17/95
09/04/85(M)
07/18/83
11/04/88
04/21/99
09/20/96
09/16/88(M)
05/16/94
02/01/86(L)
05/16/80
12/01/91(L)
10/18/83
01/17/91
04/02/91
05/02/83
08/01/87(L)
08/04/87(M)
09/30/88(M)
11/02/90
11/15/89
09/27/85(M)
08/05/91
01/17/79
07/05/77
03/04/87
06/19/89
(NSFHA)
01/25/80(M)
02/17/89(M)
05/17/90
06/01/79(M)
(NSFHA)
04/15/86
07/18/83
10/16/92
01/02/87
(NSFHA)
03/01/78
06/18/80
09/02/82
Page 12 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390479#
390054B
390507#
390531#
390725
390629#
390130#
390046#
390356#
390449#
390131#
390563#
390630#
390740A
390196#
390564#
390063#
390235#
390032
390337
390022#
390059
390780#
390302#
390423A
390532#
39063 1#
390303#
390797#
390132#
390372#
390163#
390546#
390781#
390152#
390632#
390364#
390391#
390533#
390633#
390690B
390502#
390634#
390890
39040 1#
395373#
390304#
390064#
390047#
390021A
390417#
390402#
Community Name
SHELBY, CITY OF
SHERRODSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SIDNEY, CITY OF
SILVER LAKE, VILLAGE OF
SMITHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SMITHVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SOLON, CITY OF
SOMERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH AMHERST, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH BLOOMFIELD, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH EUCLID, CITY OF
SOUTH LEBANON, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH POINT, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH RUSSELL, VILLAGE OF
SPRING VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
SPRINGBORO, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. BERNARD, CITY OF
ST. CLAIRSVILLE, CITY OF
ST. LOUISVILLE, VILLLAGE OF
ST. MARYS, CITY OF
ST. PARIS, VILLAGE OF
STARK COUNTY*
STEUBENVILLE, CITY OF
STOCKPORT, VILLAGE OF
STOW, CITY OF
STRASBURG, CITY OF
STRATTON, VILLAGE OF
STREETSBORO, CITY OF
STRONGSVILLE, CITY OF
STRUTHERS, CITY OF
SUGAR GROVE, VILLAGE OF
SUGARCREEK, VILLAGE OF
SUMMIT COUNTY *
SUNBURY, VILLAGE OF
SWANTON, VILLAGE OF
SYLVANIA, CITY OF
SYRACUSE, VILLAGE OF
TALLMADGE, CITY OF
TERRACE PARK, VILLAGE OF
THURSTON, VILLAGE OF
TIFFIN, CITY OF
TILTONSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
TIMBERLAKE, VILLAGE OF
TIPP CITY, CITY OF
TOLEDO, CITY OF
TORONTO, CITY OF
TREMONT CITY, VILLAGE OF
TRENTON, CITY OF
TRIMBLE, VILLAGE OF
TROTWOOD, CITY OF
TROY, CITY OF
County
RICHLAND COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
AUGLAIZE COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/02/89(R)
09/04/87(R)
11/17/82(R)
03/16/81(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/21/95(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/01/78(R)
05/02/83(R)
07/02/76
08/01/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/19/84(R)
01/30/84(R)
02/04/87(R)
09/06/89(R)
05/29/79(R)
09/01/83(R)
01/06/83(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/04/87(R)
10/15/82(R)
12/18/84(R)
01/03/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/04/87(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/09/96(R)
07/05/77(R)
07/05/83(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
01/05/84(R)
1 l/23/84(R)
07/03/86(R)
10/15/82(R)
08/04/88(R)
07/18/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
10/18/83(R)
08/13/97(R)
09/03/79(R)
11/01/95(R)
12/18/79(R)
06/15/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/02/89
09/04/87(M)
11/17/82
03/16/81
(NSFHA)
05/03/93
07/21/99
02/18/81
05/01/80
09/30/99
08/17/81
10/18/94
05/02/83
12/26/75
08/01/80
02/04/81
12/03/87
09/19/84
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/06/89
(NSFHA)
09/01/83
01/06/83
08/01/87(L)
07/17/78
08/04/87
10/15/82
12/18/84
01/03/79
11/19/80
09/02/82
08/04/87
04/15/81
04/21/99
02/15/84
10/06/00
07/05/83
04/15/81
01/05/84
1 l/23/84(M)
07/03/86
10/15/82
(NSFHA)
12/08/98(M)
10/06/00
10/18/83
05/17/90
1 2/25/8 1(M)
11/01/95(L)
12/18/79
Page 13 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390535#
390782#
390666A
390534#
390547#
390793
390808#
390704
390133
390178#
390592
390060#
390338#
390134#
390669#
390784#
390552A
390418#
395374#
390142#
390553#
390189
390386#
390649#
390288A
390635#
390636#
390023#
390757#
390541#
390135#
390733A
390566#
390166#
390087A
390637
390184
390452#
390574#
390667#
390565#
390358#
390293B
390088#
390905
Community Name
TRUMBULL COUNTY *
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY*
TUSCARAWAS, VILLAGE OF
TWINSBURG, CITY OF
UHRICHSVILLE, CITY OF
UNION CITY, VILLAGE OF
UNION COUNTY *
UNION, CITY OF
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, CITY OF
UPPER ARLINGTON, CITY OF
UPPER SANDUSKY, CITY OF
URBANA, CITY OF
UTICA, VILLAGE OF
VALLEY VIEW, VILLAGE OF
VALLEYVIEW, VILLAGE OF
VAN WERT COUNTY*
VAN WERT, CITY OF
VANDALIA, CITY OF
VERMILION, CITY OF
VERSAILLES, VILLAGE OF
VINTON COUNTY *
VINTON, VILLAGE OF
WADSWORTH, CITY OF
WAITE HILL, VILLAGE OF
WAKEMAN, VILLAGE OF
WALBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
WALTON HILLS, VILLAGE OF
WAPAKONETA, CITY OF
WARREN COUNTY*
WARREN, CITY OF
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, CITY OF
WARSAW, VILLAGE OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WASHINGTON COURTHOUSE, CITY OF
WASHINGTONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WATERVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WAUSEON, CITY OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WAYNE COUNTY *
WAYNESBURG, VILLAGE OF
WAYNESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WELLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
WELLSTON, CITY OF
WELLSVILLE, CITY OF
WEST ALEXANDRIA, VILLAGE OF
County
TRUMBULL COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
LICKING COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
VINTON COUNTY
GALLIA COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
AUGLAIZE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
COSHOCTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
STARK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
COLUMBIANA
COUNTY
PREBLE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/78(R)
09/30/87(R)
01/12/76
02/04/8 1(R)
01/02/87(R)
05/13/83(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/24/81(R)
07/31/79(R)
04/15/80(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/03/84(R)
12/15/82(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/28/75
1 1/04/8 1(R)
12/31/70(R)
09/06/89(R)
06/01/92(R)
02/06/79
09/04/85(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
10/18/83(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/06/89(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/01/77(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/15/78(R)
01/26/96
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/06/84(R)
01/15/88(R)
05/17/89(R)
07/05/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/01/94(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/21/01(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/29/78
09/30/87
06/04/76
08/04/88
01/02/87
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/21/99
(NSFHA)
04/03/84
12/15/82
02/18/81
04/21/99
09/01/87(L)
06/25/76
11/04/81
11/12/82
09/06/89
06/01/92(L)
12/27/74
09/04/85
08/01/79
09/01/86(L)
10/18/83
02/18/81
09/06/89
09/21/00
08/01/77
08/17/81
09/01/87(L)
02/18/81
08/15/78
06/04/76
10/06/00
(NSFHA)
01/15/88
05/03/93
07/05/82
09/21/00
06/04/80
02/01/94(L)
09/29/78
Page 14 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390419#
390638
390814
390343#
390344
390403#
390668#
390179#
390136#
390180#
390639#
390321#
390289B
390785#
390072#
390866#
390323#
390322#
390324#
390867B
390075#
390459#
390305B
390809#
390239#
390406
390495#
390181#
390787#
390240#
390197#
390033#
390373#
390345
390427#
390752A
Community Name
Adopted Preble Co. (CID# 390460) FIRM Panel No. 390460
0010B 1/17/91
WEST CARROLLTON, CITY OF
WEST JEFFERSON, VILLAGE OF
WEST LAFAYETTE, VILLAGE OF
WEST LIBERTY, VILLAGE OF
WEST MANSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WEST MILTON, VILLAGE OF
WEST SALEM, VILLAGE OF
WESTERVILLE, CITY OF
WESTLAKE, CITY OF
WHITEHALL, CITY OF
WHITEHOUSE, VILLAGE OF
WICKLIFFE, CITY OF
WILLARD, CITY OF
WILLIAMS COUNTY*
WILLIAMSBURG, VILLAGE OF
WILLIAMSPORT, VILLAGE OF
WILLOUGHBY HILLS, CITY OF
WILLOUGHBY, CITY OF
WILLOWICK, CITY OF
WILLSHIRE, VILLAGE OF
WILMINGTON, CITY OF
WINDHAM, VILLAGE OF
WINTERSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WOOD COUNTY *
WOODLAWN, VILLAGE OF
WOODSFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WOODVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WORTHINGTON, CITY OF
WYANDOT COUNTY*
WYOMING, CITY OF
XENIA, CITY OF
YORKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
YOUNGSTOWN, CITY OF
ZANESFIELD, VILLAGE OF
ZANESVILLE, CITY OF
ZOAR, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
COSHOCTON
COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
MIAMI COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
CLERMONT COUNTY
PICKAWAY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
VAN WERT COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
BELMONT COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MAHONING COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
715
691
53
138
24
24
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/81(R)
07/24/91
03/22/82(R)
03/04/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/16/80(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/19/81(R)
01/02/80(R)
1 1/02/84(R)
08/19/87(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
1 l/23/84(R)
01/16/80(R)
01/16/81(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/01/92(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/14/79(R)
01/05/79(R)
01/05/84(R)
09/04/86(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/18/87(R)
03/02/79(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
10/15/82(R)
07/18/77(R)
06/11/79(R)
09/16/88(R)
09/04/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/81
07/25/75
(NSFHA)
03/04/85
(NSFHA)
06/08/98
05/03/93
04/21/99
01/16/80
04/21/99
02/01/84
01/02/80
1 1/02/84(M)
08/19/87(M)
02/04/81
09/30/99
01/16/80
01/16/81
12/04/79
04/01/92(L)
08/24/79
12/14/79(M)
01/05/79(M)
12/17/91
09/04/86
(NSFHA)
06/18/80
04/21/99
09/18/87(M)
03/02/79(M)
01/02/81
10/15/82
07/18/77
(NSFHA)
09/05/90
09/04/87(M)
Page 15 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 16 of 18 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
390805A
390243B
390901#
390650A
390643
390898#
390816#
390753#
390488A
390817A
390685A
390818A
390819A
390822#
390555#
390262
390314#
390830#
390804#
390492#
390267B
390250A
390897#
390769#
390594#
390505A
390246A
390834#
390738#
390201#
390806#
390050A
390756
390718
390254A
390799A
390746#
390844#
390895#
390119#
390285A
390851A
390852A
390854#
390802A
Community Name
"OHIO
BELOIT, VILLAGE OF
BENTON RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
BERKEY, VILLAGE OF
BERLIN HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
BOLIVAR, VILLAGE OF
BRICE, VILLAGE OF
BUCKLAND, VILLAGE OF
BURBANK, VILLAGE OF
BURGOON, VILLAGE OF
CARROLL, VILLAGE OF
CASTINE, VILLAGE OF
CHATFIELD, VILLAGE OF
CHERRY FORK, VILLAGE OF
COOLVILLE, VILLAGE OF
COR WIN, VILLAGE OF
DESHLER, VILLAGE OF
FAIRPORT HARBOR, VILLAGE OF
FORT LORAMIE, VILLAGE OF
FREEPORT, VILLAGE OF
GREEN SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
HARDIN COUNTY *
HARRISBURG, VILLAGE OF
HIGHLAND COUNTY *
HUNTING VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
JACKSON CENTER, VILLAGE OF
JENERA, VILLAGE OF
JUNCTION CITY, VILLAGE OF
KELLEYS ISLAND, VILLAGE OF
KIMBOLTON, VILLAGE OF
LA GRANGE, TOWN OF
LEESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MARSEILLES, VILLAGE OF
MCARTHUR, VILLAGE OF
MCGUFFEY, VILLAGE OF
MIFFLIN, VILLAGE OF
MORRAL, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT STERLING, VILLAGE OF
NEW ALBANY, VILLAGE OF
NEWBURGH HEIGHTS, VILLAGE OF
NORTH FAIRFIELD, VILLAGE OF
PHILO, VILLAGE OF
PORT WILLIAM, VILLAGE OF
QUINCY, VILLAGE OF
RENDVILLE, VILLAGE OF
County
MAHONING COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
LUCAS COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
TUSCARAWAS
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
AUGLAIZE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ATHENS COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
SANDUSKY COUNTY
SENECA COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
GEAUGA COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
GUERNSEY COUNTY
LORAIN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
VINTON COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY
HURON COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
08/26/77
1 l/23/84(F)
10/06/00(F)
04/05/74
10/29/76
08/02/95(F)
09/06/89(F)
05/17/89(F)
08/02/74
09/22/78(F)
07/15/77
10/27/78
09/22/78
1 1/03/78
09/03/80(F)
07/23/76
05/15/80(F)
09/22/78
10/28/77
08/15/80(F)
11/02/84(F)
1 l/26/76(F)
08/02/95(F)
12/16/77
01/05/78(F)
05/31/74
08/09/74
09/02/82(F)
08/17/81(F)
02/17/89(F)
12/23/77
09/20/74
04/18/75
1 1/26/76
05/10/74
07/08/77
02/04/87(F)
09/29/78
08/02/95(F)
06/01/79(F)
03/15/74
03/30/79
10/13/78
10/06/78
12/02/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
08/26/78
07/17/89(8)
10/06/01
04/05/75
10/29/77
08/02/96
02/02/80
04/18/76
08/02/75
09/22/79
07/15/78
10/27/79
09/22/79
1 1/03/79
02/08/75
07/23/77
07/23/77
09/22/79
10/28/78
08/15/80(8)
08/03/89(8)
01/03/76
08/02/96
12/16/78
02/23/78(8)
05/31/75
08/09/75
01/05/80
01/29/86(W)
05/28/77
12/23/78
09/20/75
04/18/76
1 1/26/77
05/10/75
07/08/78
04/18/76
09/29/79
08/02/96
08/15/89(8)
03/15/75
03/30/80
10/13/79
10/06/79
12/02/78
Page 17 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
390706
390789A
390710A
390891#
390485B
390860A
390862#
390591B
390893#
390648A
390904#
390864#
390865#
390579#
390798#
390640B
Community Name
SARAHSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SARDINIA, VILLAGE OF
SHAWNEE, VILLAGE OF
SHREVE, CITY OF
SOUTH SALEM, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH ZANESVILLE, VILLAGE OF
STRYKER, VILLAGE OF
SYCAMORE, VILLAGE OF
URBANCREST, VILLAGE OF
VAN BUREN, VILLAGE OF
WAYNE LAKES, VILLAGE OF
WEST FARMINGTON, VILLAGE OF
WHARTON, VILLAGE OF
WOOSTER, CITY OF
YANKEE LAKE, VILLAGE OF
YELLOW SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
NOBLE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ROSS COUNTY
MUSKINGUM
COUNTY
WILLIAMS COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
DARKE COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
WYANDOT COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
TRUMBULL COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
0
9
2
Hazard Area
Identified
03/28/75
01/13/78
09/01/87(F)
05/17/89(F)
08/23/74
10/20/78
01/19/79
06/03/86(F)
08/02/95(F)
03/22/74
06/20/00(F)
10/16/84(F)
01/12/79
02/02/77(F)
07/29/77
09/04/85(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
03/28/76
01/13/79
09/01/87(8)
05/17/90
08/23/75
06/09/99(W)
01/19/80
06/03/86(8)
08/02/96
03/22/75
06/20/01
09/29/79
01/12/80
06/15/77(8)
07/29/78
09/04/85(8)
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 54
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 54
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 18 of 18
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400173#
400501#
400155A
400257A
400063#
400258B
400072#
400341
4000 18#
400182
4000 19#
400342
40003 1#
400343#
400008#
400147#
400148#
400220#
400009B
400487
400345#
400260#
400261 A
400254#
400346#
400347A
400020#
400207#
400078#
400348#
400101#
400262A
400042B
400349#
400350#
400138A
400468#
400120#
400121#
400264
40005 1#
400236#
400107A
400469#
Communities
Community Name
"OKLAHOMA
ADA, CITY OF
ADAIR COUNTY*
AFTON, TOWN OF
ALDERSON, CITY OF
ALEX, TOWN OF
ALINE, TOWN OF
ALTUS, CITY OF
ALVA, CITY OF
ANADARKO, CITY OF
ANTLERS, TOWN OF
APACHE, CITY OF
ARAPAHO, TOWN OF
ARDMORE,CITY OF
ARKOMA, TOWN OF
ATOKA, CITY OF
AVANT, TOWN OF
BARNSDALL, CITY OF
BARTLESVILLE, CITY OF
BEAVER, TOWN OF
BECKHAM COUNTY *
BEGGS, CITY OF
BENNINGTON, TOWN OF
BESSIE, TOWN OF
BETHANY, CITY OF
BETHEL ACRES, TOWN OF
BILLINGS, TOWN OF
BINGER, TOWN OF
BIXBY, TOWN OF
BLACKWELL, CITY OF
BLAIR, TOWN OF
BLANCHARD, CITY OF
BLUEJACKET, TOWN OF
BOISE CITY, CITY OF
BOKCHITO, TOWN OF
BOKOSHE, TOWN OF
BOLEY,TOWN OF
BOWLEGS, TOWN OF
BOYNTON, TOWN OF
BRAGGS, TOWN OF
BRAMAN, TOWN OF
BRISTOW, CITY OF
BROKEN ARROW, CITY OF
BROKEN BOW, CITY OF
BROOKSVILLE, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
PONTOTOC COUNTY
ADAIR COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WOODS COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
PUSHMATAHA
COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
ATOKA COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BECKHAM COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
CRAIG COUNTY
CIMARRON COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
OKFUSKEE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
MCCURTAIN COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/80(R)
04/01/88(R)
01/03/86(R)
03/04/86(R)
02/02/83(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/30/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
03/01/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/15/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
04/19/83(R)
07/20/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/30/93
09/19/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
07/31/79(R)
12/01/89(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/19/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/03/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
10/24/78(R)
11/01/85(R)
10/19/82(R)
04/17/79(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/25/78(R)
10/16/92(R)
05/04/82(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/80
02/05/97
01/03/86(M)
03/04/86(M)
02/02/83
10/15/85(M)
07/02/80
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
03/01/86(L)
09/27/91
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
04/19/83(M)
11/16/95
07/16/80
07/16/80
10/16/92
07/01/87(L)
1 2/29/8 1(M)
09/30/92
05/01/85(M)
05/02/95
04/02/92
06/19/85(M)
09/27/91
09/22/99
05/19/97
08/03/82(M)
01/03/86(M)
10/24/78(M)
11/01/85(M)
09/30/92
04/17/79(M)
03/01/87(L)
07/02/92
03/04/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/04/82(M)
09/22/99
09/01/87(L)
04/02/92
Page lof 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400482#
400351 A
400005#
400266A
400267A
400048#
400479#
400353#
400354#
400268#
400269A
400271 A
400485#
400272A
4000 12B
400274
40002 1#
400276A
400185#
400237#
40023 8 A
400187#
400488#
400006#
400183#
400234#
400470#
400357#
400115
400553
405375#
400358A
400280B
400475#
400162
400054#
400510#
400047B
400359#
400360#
400489#
405376#
400361 A
400513#
400362#
4002 16#
400097#
400540#
400490#
400098#
400283A
400165#
Community Name
BRYAN COUNTY *
BUFFALO, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
BUTLER, TOWN OF
BYARS,TOWN OF
CACHE,TOWN OF
CADDO COUNTY *
CADDO, TOWN OF
CALERA, TOWN OF
CALUMET, TOWN OF
CALVIN, TOWN OF
CAMERON,TOWN OF
CANADIAN COUNTY*
CANADIAN, TOWN OF
CANTON, TOWN OF
CANUTE, TOWN OF
CARNEGIE, TOWN OF
CARTER, TOWN OF
CATOOSA, CITY OF
CHANDLER, CITY OF
CHECOTAH, CITY OF
CHELSEA, CITY OF
CHEROKEE COUNTY*
CHEROKEE, CITY OF
CHEYENNE, TOWN OF
CHICKASHA, CITY OF
CHOCTAW COUNTY
CHOCTAW, CITY OF
CHOUTEAU, TOWN OF
CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION
CLAREMORE, CITY OF
CLAYTON, TOWN OF
CLEO SPRINGS, TOWN OF
CLEVELAND COUNTY*
CLEVELAND, CITY OF
CLINTON, CITY OF
COAL COUNTY*
COALGATE, CITY OF
COLBERT, TOWN OF
COLLINSVILLE, CITY OF
COMANCHE COUNTY *
COMANCHE, CITY OF
COP AN, TOWN OF
COTTON COUNTY*
COVINGTON, TOWN OF
COWETA, CITY OF
COYLE, TOWN OF
CRAIG COUNTY*
CREEK COUNTY*
CRESCENT, CITY OF
CROWDER, CITY OF
GUSHING, CITY OF
County
BRYAN COUNTY
HARPER COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
BECKHAM COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
ROGER MILLS
COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
PUSHMATAHA
COUNTY
MAJOR COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
COAL COUNTY
COAL COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COTTON COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
CRAIG COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
PAYNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/1 8/9 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/15/90(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/18/87(R)
06/12/95(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/03/86(R)
01/01/92(R)
03/01/87(R)
04/19/83(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/15/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
06/03/84(R)
07/20/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/01/80(R)
11/04/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
12/02/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/30/80(R)
03/29/91
04/1 5/8 1(R)
01/26/83(R)
12/01/00
08/27/71(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/01/89(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/08/78(R)
04/15/86(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
02/19/92(R)
1 2/23/7 1(R)
07/26/77(R)
09/06/89(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/18/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/17/96(R)
06/01/87(R)
03/16/82(R)
02/19/86(R)
07/16/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/92
09/01/87(L)
12/15/90
05/15/85(M)
06/05/85(M)
1 1/02/95
09/27/91
(NSFHA)
09/30/92
01/19/00
03/01/87(L)
04/19/83(M)
01/19/00
05/15/85(M)
05/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
05/15/85(M)
06/15/88
07/16/96
06/19/85(M)
12/19/97
03/18/91
01/19/82
08/09/00(M)
12/03/93
01/17/97
04/15/81
(NSFHA)
11/02/95
05/01/85(M)
06/05/85(M)
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
04/03/87
01/18/89
08/08/78(M)
09/30/92
09/22/99
1 1/02/95
01/16/92
07/26/77(M)
09/27/91
09/30/95
09/18/86
12/05/89
04/17/96
06/01/87(L)
12/05/89
02/19/86(M)
07/16/80
Page 2 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400486
400365B
400204#
400366A
400233#
400502#
400143#
40022 1#
40008 1#
400052#
400202#
400460#
400371 A
400252#
405377#
4000 10#
400062#
400376
400150B
400377A
400112#
400379A
400022#
400123#
400205
400227B
400060
400380#
400473#
400032
400208#
400102#
400383B
400195#
400023#
400483#
400066
400544
400385#
400099#
400243B
400167B
400386#
400545
400140#
400387#
400124#
400033B
400090#
400388
400144#
400084#
400285A
400244A
Community Name
CUSTER COUNTY *
DAVENPORT, TOWN OF
DAVIDSON, TOWN OF
DAVIS, CITY OF
DEL CITY, CITY OF
DELAWARE COUNTY *
DEWAR, TOWN OF
DEWEY, CITY OF
DOVER, TOWN OF
DRUMRIGHT, CITY OF
DUNCAN, CITY OF
DURANT, CITY OF
DUSTIN, TOWN OF
EDMOND, CITY OF
EL RENO, CITY OF
ELK CITY, CITY OF
ENID, CITY OF
EUFAULA, CITY OF
FAIRFAX, TOWN OF
FAIRLAND, TOWN OF
FAIRVIEW, CITY OF
FOREST PARK, CITY OF
FORT COBB, TOWN OF
FORT GIBSON, TOWN OF
FREDERICK, CITY OF
FREEDOM, TOWN OF
GAGE, TOWN OF
GARBER, CITY OF
GARFIELD COUNTY*
GENE AUTRY, TOWN OF
GLENPOOL, TOWN OF
GOLDSBY, TOWN OF
GOODWELL, TOWN OF
GORE, TOWN OF
GRACEMONT, TOWN OF
GRADY COUNTY*
GRANITE, TOWN OF
GREER COUNTY*
GROVE, TOWN OF
GUTHRIE, CITY OF
GUYMON, CITY OF
HAILEYVILLE, CITY OF
HAMMON, TOWN OF
HARMON COUNTY*
HARRAH, CITY OF
HARTSHORNE, CITY OF
HASKELL, TOWN OF
HEALDTON, CITY OF
HEAVENER, CITY OF
HELENA, TOWN OF
HENRYETTA, CITY OF
HOBART, CITY OF
HOFFMAN, TOWN OF
HOLDENVILLE, CITY OF
County
CUSTER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
TILLMAN COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KINGFISHER COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
BRYAN COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
BECKHAM COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
MCINTOSH COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
MAJOR COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
TILLMAN COUNTY
WOODS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
TEXAS COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
GREER COUNTY
GREER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
TEXAS COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
ROGER MILLS
COUNTY
HARMON COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/20/94
10/31/78(R)
08/05/97(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/01/90(R)
06/05/85(R)
07/06/82(R)
01/17/91(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/28/77(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/17/73(R)
06/01/82(R)
03/15/79(R)
09/01/81(R)
11/15/85(R)
01/01/92(R)
03/04/88(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/30/99
03/02/8 1(R)
09/15/89(R)
01/18/88(R)
09/01/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/25/78(R)
10/03/94
02/1 8/8 1(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/13/82(R)
01/27/95
07/16/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/03/86(R)
03/16/82(R)
03/16/92(R)
03/04/80(R)
06/29/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
08/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/31/78(M)
08/05/97
06/19/85(M)
09/15/93
06/08/98
11/06/91
01/02/92
01/17/91
07/02/80
01/16/92
09/30/92
06/28/77(M)
02/06/91
01/19/00
06/01/82(M)
09/30/95
(NSFHA)
11/15/85(M)
01/01/92(L)
03/04/88
07/03/85(M)
09/27/91
03/04/91
(NSFHA)
06/05/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/95
09/30/95
1 1/08/74
09/22/99
09/15/89
01/18/88(M)
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
09/30/93
(NSFHA)
08/01/83
12/05/89
06/19/85(M)
08/05/85(M)
08/09/00(M)
04/26/83
09/21/98
03/04/91
01/03/86(M)
03/16/82(M)
(NSFHA)
12/03/91
06/29/82(M)
08/05/85(M)
08/15/78(M)
Page 3 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400068C
400151#
40009 1#
400467#
400040
400036#
400286#
400024#
400108#
400287#
400456#
400480#
400057
400065A
400209#
400141#
400477#
400391 A
400393#
40047 1#
400082A
400071 A
400543
400190#
400169#
400293#
400294#
400295A
400535#
400069
400049#
400299A
400043#
400457#
400245#
400116
400096#
400395#
400085#
400025#
400396#
400114#
400067
400302#
400303
400304#
400400#
400203#
40051 1#
400306#
400307
40040 1#
40045 8#
400402#
Community Name
HOLLIS, CITY OF
HOMINY, CITY OF
HOWE, TOWN OF
HUGHES COUNTY *
HUGO, CITY OF
HULBERT, TOWN OF
HUNTER, TOWN OF
HYDRO, TOWNSHIP OF
IDABEL, CITY OF
INDIAHOMA, TOWN OF
INOLA, TOWN OF
JACKSON COUNTY*
JAY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON, TOWN OF
JENKS, CITY OF
JONES CITY, TOWN OF
KAY COUNTY*
KEOTA, TOWN OF
KIEFER, TOWN OF
KINGFISHER COUNTY
KINGFISHER, CITY OF
KINTA, CITY OF
KIOWA COUNTY*
KONAWA, CITY OF
KREBS, CITY OF
KREMLIN, CITY OF
LAHOMA, TOWN OF
LAMONT, TOWN OF
LATIMER COUNTY*
LAVERNE, TOWN OF
LAWTON, CITY OF
LEHIGH, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LINDSAY, CITY OF
LOCUST GROVE, TOWN OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LONE GROVE, TOWN OF
LONE WOLF, TOWN OF
LOOKEBA, TOWN OF
LUTHER, TOWN OF
MADILL, CITY OF
MANGUM, CITY OF
MANITOU, TOWN OF
MANNSVILLE, TOWN OF
MARBLE CITY, TOWN OF
MARIETTA, CITY OF
MARLOW, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY
MARSHALL, TOWN OF
MARTHA, TOWN OF
MAUD, CITY OF
MAYES COUNTY*
MAYSVILLE, TOWN OF
County
HARMON COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
MCCURTAIN COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
KINGFISHER COUNTY
KINGFISHER COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
LATIMER COUNTY
HARPER COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
COAL COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
GREER COUNTY
TILLMAN COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
LOVE COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/01/89(R)
02/12/79(R)
04/15/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
11/01/89(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/16/87(R)
06/16/99(R)
07/05/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/17/82(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
03/05/90(R)
07/18/85(R)
04/15/82(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
09/30/76(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/20/94
10/26/82(R)
08/05/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/27/93(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/15/91(R)
07/05/78(R)
12/01/78(R)
05/01/85(R)
12/02/80(R)
02/03/93(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/11/78(R)
12/05/89(R)
03/16/89(R)
06/29/82(R)
07/13/82(R)
02/17/88(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/29/79(R)
08/03/82(R)
09/15/00
08/19/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/28/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/08/97(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/01/89(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/85(M)
11/19/80
04/15/82
12/01/89(L)
(NSFHA)
03/18/91
(NSFHA)
09/27/91
07/16/80
1 1/02/95
09/16/88
06/16/99(M)
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
09/22/99
01/02/81
05/19/97
07/18/85(M)
04/15/82
09/18/91
09/30/76
08/01/87(L)
07/02/92
08/05/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/30/95
08/19/85(M)
05/15/91
(NSFHA)
1 1/02/95
05/01/85(M)
01/20/99
12/06/99
08/02/93
(NSFHA)
12/05/89
03/16/89
06/29/82(M)
09/27/91
02/17/88
09/30/97
(NSFHA)
08/03/82(M)
09/26/75
05/04/92
07/03/85(M)
01/16/92
09/30/97
12/05/89
(NSFHA)
07/02/92
05/04/99
09/30/81
Page 4 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400170#
400538#
400397A
400398#
400403A
400404A
400157#
400405#
400196#
400044#
400230B
400407#
400133
400086#
400087B
400197#
40049 1#
400125#
400409#
4003 11#
400224#
400103#
400422A
400423#
400424#
405382#
400132#
400045#
400046#
400425#
400136#
400313A
4002 17B
400015B
400429A
405378#
400466#
400492#
400145#
400126#
400430#
400 189 A
400146#
400154#
4002 10#
400092
400246#
400152#
400163#
Community Name
MCALESTER, CITY OF
MCCLAIN COUNTY*
MCCURTIN, CITY OF
MCLOUD, TOWN OF
MEDFORD, CITY OF
MEEKER, CITY OF
MIAMI, CITY OF
MIDWEST CITY, CITY OF
MOFFETT, TOWN OF
MOORE, CITY OF
MOORELAND, TOWN OF
MORRIS, CITY OF
MORRISON, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN PARK, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW, TOWN OF
MULDROW, TOWN OF
MUSKOGEE COUNTY *
MUSKOGEE, CITY OF
MUSTANG, CITY OF
NASH, TOWN OF
NEW CORDELL, CITY OF
NEWCASTLE, TOWN OF
NEWKIRK,CITY OF
NICHOLS HILLS, CITY OF
NICOMA PARK, TOWN OF
NINNEKAH, TOWN OF
NOBLE COUNTY
NOBLE, CITY OF
NORMAN,CITY OF
NORTH ENID, TOWN OF
NOW ATA, CITY OF
OAKLAND, TOWN OF
OKAY, TOWN OF
OKEENE, TOWN OF
OKEMAH,CITY OF
OKLAHOMA CITY, CITY OF
OKLAHOMA COUNTY*
OKMULGEE COUNTY *
OKMULGEE, CITY OF
OKTAHA, TOWN OF
OLUSTEE, TOWN OF
OOLOGAH, TOWN OF
OSAGE COUNTY*
OTTAWA COUNTY *
OWASSO, CITY OF
PANAMA, TOWN OF
PAULS VALLEY, CITY OF
PAWHUSKA, CITY OF
PAWNEE, CITY OF
County
PITTSBURG COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
WOODWARD
COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
NOW ATA COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
OKFUSKEE COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
OKMULGEE COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/79(R)
02/03/93(R)
08/19/85(R)
10/16/87(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/29/82(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/03/82(R)
12/12/78(R)
04/15/82(R)
03/04/9 1(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
05/02/83(R)
12/15/83(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/20/82(R)
07/16/80(R)
02/15/85(R)
11/18/92(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
11/01/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
01/03/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/28/82(R)
11/15/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
07/14/72(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/03/82(R)
03/01/87(R)
12/01/89(R)
12/02/88(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/01/81(R)
09/17/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/90
06/02/95
08/19/85(M)
04/02/92
09/04/85(M)
04/15/86(M)
09/03/97
06/16/95
05/04/92
01/20/99
06/19/85(M)
06/29/82(M)
(NSFHA)
08/03/82(M)
12/12/78(M)
05/04/92
03/04/91
03/04/91
01/19/00
09/27/91
05/02/83
1 1/22/99
08/05/85(M)
01/20/82
07/16/80
02/15/85(M)
06/18/96
01/20/99
01/20/99
09/30/95
06/16/93
08/05/85(M)
09/28/82(M)
11/15/85(M)
08/01/87(L)
03/17/97
03/04/87
09/27/91
12/03/91
(NSFHA)
08/03/82(M)
03/01/87(L)
03/23/99
12/19/97
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
05/06/96
07/16/80
06/02/95
Page 5 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400493#
400134#
400159A
400027#
400171A
400432#
400080#
400433A
400434
400127#
400093#
400496#
400435#
400117#
400104#
400172B
400164B
400222
4003 18#
400320A
40032 1#
400437A
400135
400322#
400176#
400542#
405379#
400198#
400088#
400064B
400439#
400118A
400199#
40021 1#
400053#
400191#
400441 A
400058
400497#
400192#
400442A
400503#
400178#
400410A
4002 12#
400539#
400089#
400507
400411 A
400328A
Community Name
PAYNE COUNTY*
PERRY, CITY OF
PICKER, CITY OF
PIEDMONT, CITY OF
PITTSBURG, TOWN OF
POCOLA, TOWN OF
PONCA CITY, CITY OF
POND CREEK, CITY OF
PORTER, TOWN OF
PORUM, TOWN OF
POTEAU, CITY OF
POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY*
PRAGUE, CITY OF
PRYOR CREEK,CITY OF
PURCELL, CITY OF
QUINTON, TOWN OF
RALSTON, TOWN OF
RAMONA, TOWN OF
RANDLETT, TOWN OF
RAVIA, TOWN OF
RED BIRD, TOWN OF
RED OAK, TOWN OF
RED ROCK, CITY OF
REYDON, TOWN OF
ROFF, TOWN OF
ROGER MILLS COUNTY*
ROGERS COUNTY*
ROLAND, TOWN OF
ROOSEVELT, TOWN OF
RUSH SPRINGS, TOWN OF
RYAN, TOWN OF
SALINA, TOWN OF
SALLISAW, CITY OF
SAND SPRINGS, CITY OF
SAPULPA, CITY OF
SASAKAWA, TOWN OF
SAYRE, CITY OF
SEILING, TOWN OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY*
SEMINOLE, CITY OF
SENTINEL, TOWN OF
SEQUOYAH COUNTY *
SHAWNEE, CITY OF
SHIDLER, CITY OF
SKIATOOK, TOWN OF
SLAUGHTERVILLE, TOWN OF
SNYDER, CITY OF
SOPER, TOWN OF
SOUTH COFFEYVILLE, TOWN OF
SPAVINAW, TOWN OF
County
PAYNE COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
PAWNEE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COTTON COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
LATIMER COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
ROGER MILLS
COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
ROGER MILLS
COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
BECKHAM COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
KIOWA COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
NOW ATA COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/19/87(R)
10/10/78(R)
09/21/82(R)
02/04/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/01/87(R)
01/26/83(R)
04/15/80(R)
01/20/82(R)
06/01/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/16/87(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/03/85(R)
03/31/88(R)
09/12/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
10/09/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
07/18/85(R)
1 l/27/79(R)
06/20/94
1 1/05/7 1(R)
01/20/82(R)
03/23/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/20/82(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/02/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/01/77(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/01/81(R)
02/16/90(R)
11/17/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
0 1/02/9 1(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/03/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/15/92(R)
04/15/80(R)
12/19/84(R)
09/14/82(R)
09/21/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/16/95
06/18/96
09/21/82(M)
01/19/00
10/15/85(M)
07/04/89
11/18/88
03/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
03/04/91
01/20/82
04/02/92
09/04/85(M)
05/04/99
07/02/81
08/05/85(M)
07/03/85(M)
02/01/88(L)
09/27/91
07/03/85(M)
10/09/79(M)
07/18/85(M)
(NSFHA)
08/09/00(M)
1 l/27/79(M)
08/09/00
12/19/97
05/04/92
03/23/82(M)
07/03/85(M)
07/20/82(M)
09/04/85(M)
05/04/92
09/22/99
04/26/83
07/02/92
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/03/85(M)
05/04/92
04/02/92
07/03/85(M)
09/22/99
01/20/99
04/15/80
(NSFHA)
09/14/82(M)
09/21/82(M)
Page 6 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400412#
400213#
400413#
400498#
400414#
40041 5 A
405380#
40000 1#
400416A
400329#
400417#
400119#
400128#
400037#
400094
400059
400179#
400420#
400206A
400077#
400079#
400218
400462#
405381#
400443A
400445#
400248#
400200#
400448A
400050#
400215#
4002 19#
400129#
400249#
400337A
400130#
400449#
400459#
400223
4000 16#
400002A
400076#
400450
400228#
400056#
400131#
400139B
400003#
400453A
400193#
400250#
400035B
Community Name
SPENCER, CITY OF
SPERRY, TOWN OF
SPIRO, TOWN OF
STEPHENS COUNTY *
STERLING, TOWN OF
STIGLER, CITY OF
STILL WATER, CITY OF
STILL WELL, CITY OF
STRATFORD, TOWN OF
STRINGTOWN, TOWN OF
STROUD, CITY OF
SULPHUR, CITY OF
TAFT, TOWN OF
TAHLEQUAH, CITY OF
TALIHINA, TOWN OF
TALOGA, TOWN OF
TECUMSEH, CITY OF
THE VILLAGE, CITY OF
TIPTON, TOWN OF
TISHOMINGO, CITY OF
TONKAWA, CITY OF
TULLAHASSEE, CITY OF
TULSA COUNTY *
TULSA, CITY OF
TUTTLE, TOWN OF
VALLEY BROOK, TOWN OF
VERDEN, TOWN OF
VIAN, TOWN OF
VICI, TOWN OF
VINITA, CITY OF
WAGONER COUNTY*
WAGONER, CITY OF
WAINWRIGHT, TOWN OF
WALTERS, CITY OF
WAPANUCKA, TOWN OF
WARNER, TOWN OF
WARR ACRES, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
WATONGA, CITY OF
WATTS, CITY OF
WAURIKA, CITY OF
WAYNE, TOWN OF
WAYNOKA, CITY OF
WEATHERFORD, CITY OF
WEBBERS FALLS, TOWN OF
WELEETKA, TOWN OF
WESTVILLE, CITY OF
WETUMKA, CITY OF
WEWOKA, CITY OF
WILBURTON, CITY OF
WILSON, CITY OF
County
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
PAYNE COUNTY
AD AIR COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
ATOKA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MURRAY COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
TILLMAN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
KAY COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
ROGERS COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
CRAIG COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
WAGONER COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
COTTON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
OKLAHOMA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
AD AIR COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
WOODS COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
OKFUSKEE COUNTY
AD AIR COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
LATIMER COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
04/20/82(R)
12/15/90(R)
07/05/78(R)
03/04/86(R)
06/22/73(R)
08/04/87(R)
11/15/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
03/06/00(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/25/87(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/01/81(R)
05/26/78(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/17/82(R)
01/15/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/01/81(R)
09/16/82(R)
08/13/71(R)
11/01/89(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
10/26/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
01/01/92(R)
06/01/81(R)
12/02/88(R)
10/19/82(R)
08/08/78(R)
07/06/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/16/80(R)
1 1/20/9 1(R)
12/06/93
06/15/88(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/06/83(R)
06/30/93
06/15/88(R)
12/18/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
ll/23/82(R)
06/29/82(R)
01/03/86(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/24/79(R)
07/03/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/80
09/22/99
04/20/82(M)
01/16/92
11/02/95
03/04/86(M)
05/04/98
02/05/97
11/15/85(M)
07/04/89
08/23/00
02/18/81
03/04/91
03/18/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/02/92
07/16/80
08/17/82(M)
01/15/88
02/04/81
(NSFHA)
09/22/99
09/22/99
11/01/89(L)
09/30/81
02/03/93
05/04/92
01/01/92(L)
07/16/91
12/02/88
10/19/82(M)
03/04/9 1(M)
09/27/91
09/01/87(L)
03/04/91
12/16/80
09/17/92
06/15/88
08/05/85(M)
01/06/83
06/15/88
12/18/79
03/04/91
ll/23/82(M)
06/29/82(M)
01/03/86(M)
07/02/92
04/24/79(M)
07/03/85(M)
Page 7 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
400095#
40048 1#
400500#
Community Name
WISTER, TOWN OF
WOODS COUNTY *
WOODWARD COUNTY *
County
LE FLORE COUNTY
WOODS COUNTY
WOODWARD
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/14/76(R)
01/17/97(R)
01/17/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/01/80
01/17/97
01/17/97
400232# WOODWARD, CITY OF
400109# WRIGHT CITY, CITY OF
400161# WYANDOTTE, TOWN OF
400251 # WYNNEWOOD, CITY OF
400028# YUKON, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
COUNTY
WOODWARD
COUNTY
MCCURTAIN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
363
351
32
113
12
4
12/16/80(R)
05/17/89(R)
12/17/87(R)
01/15/88(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/16/80
05/17/89
12/19/97
01/15/88
01/19/00
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
400255#
400256
400074A
400174#
400259#
400508#
40001 1#
400263
400530#
400465#
400149
400273
400355
400030#
400278
400279#
400281
400253#
400156A
400225
400122#
400363A
400282#
400364#
400226A
400512#
400367
400537#
400369
400524#
400373#
400374#
400528#
400039A
400194#
400472#
400381
400013A
400541#
400288
400007
400290
400394
400168
400297#
400484#
400547#
Community Name
"OKLAHOMA
ACHILLE, TOWN OF
ADAIR, TOWN OF
ADDINGTON, TOWN OF
ALLEN, TOWN OF
ASHER, TOWN OF
ATOKA COUNTY *
ELAINE COUNTY
BRADLEY, TOWN OF
BRECKENRIDGE, TOWN OF
BRIDGEPORT, TOWN OF
BURBANK, TOWN OF
CANEY, TOWN OF
CARMEN, TOWN OF
CARTER COUNTY
CASTLE, TOWN OF
CHATTANOOGA, TOWN OF
COLCORD, TOWN OF
COLONY, TOWN OF
COMMERCE, CITY OF
CORN, TOWN OF
COUNCIL HILL, TOWN OF
COWLINGTON, TOWN OF
CROMWELL, TOWN OF
CYRIL, TOWN OF
DACOMA, TOWN OF
DELAWARE TRIBE OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA
DELAWARE, TOWN OF
DEVOL, TOWN OF
DICKSON, TOWN OF
EARLSBORO, TOWN OF
ELGIN, TOWN OF
ELMORE, CITY OF
FAIRMONT, TOWN OF
FORT TOWSON,TOWN OF
GANS, TOWN OF
GARVIN COUNTY
GEARY, CITY OF
GREENFIELD, TOWN OF
HALL PARK, TOWN OF
INDIANOLA, TOWN OF
JET, TOWN OF
KANSAS, TOWN OF
KINGSTON, TOWN OF
KIOWA, TOWN OF
LANGSTON, TOWN OF
LE FLORE COUNTY *
LIBERTY, TOWN OF
County
BRYAN COUNTY
MAYES COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
ATOKA COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
OSAGE COUNTY
ATOKA COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
OKFUSKEE COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
WASHITA COUNTY
MUSKOGEE COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
WOODS COUNTY
CADDO COUNTY
NOW ATA COUNTY
COTTON COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CHOCTAW COUNTY
SEQUOYAH COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
ELAINE COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
ALFALFA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
LE FLORE COUNTY
TULSA COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
09/1 8/9 1(F)
04/02/76(F)
10/18/74
11/30/82(F)
04/02/92(F)
08/14/81
08/02/95(F)
08/13/76
09/27/9 1(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
01/10/75
04/09/76
09/19/75
07/05/77
05/07/76(F)
02/19/92(F)
11/19/76
02/16/83(F)
07/18/85(F)
01/10/75
03/04/9 1(F)
03/11/77
02/16/90(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
11/08/74
01/18/88(F)
04/09/76
09/06/89(F)
07/30/76
04/02/92(F)
02/19/92(F)
07/20/82(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
08/01/87(F)
04/15/82(F)
03/26/82
10/29/76
08/30/74
03/17/97(F)
04/02/76
12/06/74
09/26/75
04/02/76
06/28/74
07/06/82(F)
01/10/78
09/16/82(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
04/02/77
04/02/77
10/18/75
04/10/97(W)
06/04/77
08/14/82
08/02/95(8)
08/13/77
09/27/92
04/01/78
01/10/76
04/09/77
09/19/76
07/05/78
09/05/76
02/19/93
11/19/77
05/04/88(8)
08/04/88(8)
01/10/76
12/13/75
03/11/78
08/13/77
04/02/77
11/08/75
1 1/20/95(W)
04/09/77
09/06/90
07/30/77
04/02/93
02/19/93
08/04/88(8)
09/27/92
08/01/87(8)
04/15/82(8)
03/26/83
10/29/77
08/30/75
03/17/98
04/02/77
12/06/75
09/26/76
04/02/77
06/28/75
08/04/88(8)
01/10/79
08/23/78
Page 9 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
40030 1#
400514#
400083
400525#
400399
400305
400106#
4005 15#
400308A
400309
400406#
400408#
4003 10#
400426
400314
400315
400427
4003 16#
400317
400158
400431
400523#
400494#
400495#
400436
400324A
400440A
400231
40006 1#
400034
400326#
400177A
400100#
400330A
40041 8#
400333
400334#
400447#
400335
400105
400338#
400451
400452
400339
400455
Community Name
LIMA, TOWN OF
LOVELL, TOWN OF
LOYAL, TOWN OF
MACOMB, TOWN OF
MANNFORD, TOWN OF
MARLAND, TOWN OF
MCCURTAIN COUNTY
MERIDIAN, TOWN OF
MILBURN, TOWN OF
MILL CREEK, TOWN OF
MINCO, TOWN OF
MOUNDS, TOWN OF
MULHALL, TOWN OF
NORTH MIAMI, TOWN OF
OAKS, TOWN OF
OCHELATA, TOWN OF
OILTON, CITY OF
ORLANDO, TOWN OF
PAOLI, TOWN OF
PEORIA, TOWN OF
PERKINS, TOWN OF
PINK, TOWN OF
PITTSBURG COUNTY *
PONTOTOC COUNTY *
QUAPAW, TOWN OF
RIPLEY, TOWN OF
SAVANNA, TOWN OF
SHARON, TOWN OF
SHATTUCK, TOWN OF
SPRINGER, TOWN OF
ST. LOUIS, TOWN OF
STONEWALL,TOWN OF
STRONG CITY, TOWN OF
STUART, CITY OF
TEMPLE, TOWN OF
TUPELO, CITY OF
UNION CITY, TOWN OF
VELMA, CITY OF
VERA, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WAUKOMIS, TOWN OF
WELCH, TOWN OF
WELLSTON, TOWN OF
WEST SILOAM SPRINGS, TOWN OF
YALE, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
County
SEMINOLE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
KINGFISHER COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
NOBLE COUNTY
MCCURTAIN COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
GRADY COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CREEK COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
GARVIN COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
PAYNE COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
OTTAWA COUNTY
PAYNE COUNTY
PITTSBURG COUNTY
WOODWARD
COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
POTTAWATOMIE
COUNTY
PONTOTOC COUNTY
ROGER MILLS
COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
COTTON COUNTY
COAL COUNTY
CANADIAN COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MCCLAIN COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CRAIG COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
PAYNE COUNTY
0
11
3
Hazard Area
Identified
02/16/90(F)
12/05/89(F)
04/25/75
04/02/92(F)
11/12/76
08/13/76
07/11/78
12/05/89(F)
06/19/85(F)
08/13/76
01/28/77
04/15/82(F)
12/05/89(F)
04/09/76
08/29/75
04/09/76
11/12/76(F)
12/05/89(F)
1 1/05/76
1 1/22/74
04/09/76
04/02/92(F)
08/17/82
01/10/78
08/13/76
06/21/77
03/01/87(F)
08/13/76
03/23/82(F)
12/17/76
04/02/92(F)
08/01/87(F)
08/09/00(F)
02/05/86(F)
09/06/89(F)
09/17/76
01/19/00(F)
12/15/90(F)
07/16/76
07/09/76
09/27/9 1(F)
07/16/76
04/09/76
04/09/76
08/22/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
12/10/77
12/05/90
04/25/76
04/02/93
11/12/77
08/13/77
07/11/79
12/05/90
08/04/88(8)
08/13/77
01/28/78
06/25/77
05/28/77
04/09/77
08/29/76
04/09/77
11/12/77
08/13/77
1 1/05/77
1 1/22/75
04/09/77
04/02/93
08/17/83
01/10/79
08/13/77
06/21/78
08/04/88(8)
08/13/77
08/04/88(8)
12/17/77
04/02/93
08/01/87(8)
08/09/01
10/28/97(W)
07/16/77
09/17/77
01/14/78
02/11/78
07/16/77
07/09/77
02/04/78
07/16/77
04/09/77
04/09/77
08/22/76
Page 10 of 11
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Hazard Area Date On Which
Identified Sanctions Apply
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 78
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 78
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 11 of 11 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410205#
410285#
410137#
410250#
410071#
410090#
410028#
410206#
410155#
410156#
410002#
410001#
410043#
410013#
410197#
410240#
410056#
410008#
410174
410110#
410053#
410138#
410281#
410084#
410091A
410014#
410029#
410075#
410060#
410251#
410087#
410107#
410092#
410111#
415588#
410035#
410027#
410119#
410034#
410036#
410072#
410044#
410042#
410045#
Communities
Community Name
"OREGON
ADAMS, CITY OF
ADRIAN, CITY OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
AMITY, CITY OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
ASHLAND, CITY OF
ASTORIA, CITY OF
ATHENA, CITY OF
AUMSVILLE, CITY OF
AURORA, CITY OF
BAKER CITY, CITY OF
BAKER COUNTY*
BANDON, CITY OF
BARLOW, CITY OF
BAY CITY, CITY OF
BEAVERTON,CITY OF
BEND, CITY OF
BENTON COUNTY *
BOARDMAN, CITY OF
BONANZA, CITY OF
BROOKINGS, CITY OF
BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF
BURNS PAIUTE RESERVATION
BURNS, CITY OF
BUTTE FALLS, TOWN OF
CANBY, CITY OF
CANNON BEACH, CITY OF
CANYON CITY, CITY OF
CANYONVILLE, CITY OF
CARLTON, CITY OF
CASCADE LOCKS, CITY OF
CAVE JUNCTION, CITY OF
CENTRAL POINT, CITY OF
CHILOQUIN, CITY OF
CLACKAMAS COUNTY*
CLATSKANIE, CITY OF
CLATSOP COUNTY*
COBURG, CITY OF
COLUMBIA COUNTY*
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
CONDON, CITY OF
COOS BAY, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE CITY OF EASTSIDE
COOS COUNTY *
COQUILLE, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
UMATILLA COUNTY
MALHEUR COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
GILLIAM COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DESCHUTES COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
KLAMATH COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
HARNEY COUNTY
HARNEY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
HOOD RIVER
COUNTY
JOSEPHINE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
KLAMATH COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
GILLIAM COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/84(R)
09/19/84(R)
04/03/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/01/81(R)
08/01/78(R)
07/16/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/17/84(R)
06/03/88(R)
08/15/84(R)
05/05/81(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/28/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/01/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/28/84(R)
08/15/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/15/84(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/18/87(R)
11/01/78(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/10/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/15/84(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
01/06/84(R)
08/16/88(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/01/84(R)
11/15/84(R)
09/28/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/15/84
09/19/84
07/07/99
12/01/81
09/24/84(M)
06/01/81
08/01/78
09/08/99
01/19/00
01/19/00
06/03/88
06/03/88
02/18/98
05/05/81
08/01/78
02/04/87
06/08/98
08/05/86
(NSFHA)
06/01/83(M)
09/18/85
08/17/81
09/28/84
12/22/98
06/30/76(M)
06/15/84
09/01/78
09/18/87
11/01/78
01/29/80(M)
09/24/84(M)
06/01/82
01/19/82
08/15/84
07/19/00
08/16/88
06/16/99
06/02/99(M)
08/16/88
08/16/88
09/24/84(M)
08/01/84
11/15/84
09/28/84
Page 1 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410261#
410009#
410120#
410121#
410050#
410290#
410052#
410187#
410252#
410076#
410283#
410055#
410157#
410059#
410061#
410231#
410253#
410262#
410263#
410093#
410207#
410218#
410062#
410225#
410016
410122#
410180#
410188#
410123#
410241#
410246#
410280#
410242#
410159
410030#
410160
410070#
410017#
410063#
410054#
410094#
410074#
410108#
410192#
410181#
410003#
410004#
410139
Community Name
CORNELIUS, CITY OF
CORVALLIS, CITY OF
COTTAGE GROVE, CITY OF
CRESWELL, CITY OF
CROOK COUNTY *
CULVER, CITY OF
CURRY COUNTY *
DALLAS, CITY OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DAYVILLE, CITY OF
DEPOE BAY, CITY OF
DESCHUTES COUNTY *
DETROIT, CITY OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DRAIN, CITY OF
DUFUR, CITY OF
DUNDEE, CITY OF
DUNES CITY, CITY OF
DURHAM, CITY OF
EAGLE POINT, CITY OF
ECHO, CITY OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELKTON, CITY OF
ENTERPRISE, CITY OF
ESTACADA, CITY OF
EUGENE, CITY OF
FAIRVIEW, CITY OF
FALLS CITY, CITY OF
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FOREST GROVE, CITY OF
FOSSIL, CITY OF
GARIBALDI, CITY OF
GASTON, TOWN OF
GATES, CITY OF
GEARHART, CITY OF
GERVAIS, CITY OF
GILLIAM COUNTY *
GLADSTONE, CITY OF
GLENDALE, CITY OF
GOLD BEACH, CITY OF
GOLD HILL, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY *
GRANTS PASS, CITY OF
GRASS VALLEY, CITY OF
GRESHAM, CITY OF
HAINES, CITY OF
HALFWAY, TOWN OF
HALSEY, CITY OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
CROOK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
DESCHUTES COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WALLOWA COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GILLIAM COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
JOSEPHINE COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/06/82(R)
01/03/85(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/17/89(R)
02/18/88(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/05/88(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/15/80(R)
08/16/88(R)
06/30/76(R)
12/15/78(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/01/82(R)
03/24/8 1(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/15/84(R)
11/15/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/07/8 1(R)
05/17/82(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/04/89(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/17/80(R)
02/15/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/30/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/21/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/06/82
01/03/85
06/02/99
06/02/99
07/17/89
09/04/87
02/04/98
12/19/95
06/01/82
09/24/84(M)
10/15/80
06/08/98
01/19/00
04/21/99
08/01/79
09/24/84(M)
03/01/82
06/02/99(M)
01/06/82
09/30/80
05/15/84
11/15/78
09/05/79
02/17/88
(NSFHA)
06/02/99
07/03/95
12/19/95
06/02/99
03/15/82
05/04/89
04/17/78
07/05/82
01/19/00
06/16/99
09/24/84(M)
03/15/77
02/18/98
03/02/98
09/17/80
05/18/82
09/27/91
09/24/84(M)
09/28/90
(NSFHA)
06/03/88
(NSFHA)
Page 2 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410026#
410083#
410140#
410208#
410175#
410209#
410243#
410085#
410086#
410088#
410161
410005#
410162
410189#
410176#
410177
410220#
415589#
410095#
410101#
410163
410077#
410150#
410226#
415590#
410124#
410288#
410269
410109#
410112#
410260#
410254#
410115#
410018#
410278#
410116#
415591#
410141#
410178#
410130#
410129#
410136#
410078#
410227#
410125#
410142#
410103#
Community Name
HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF
HARNEY COUNTY *
HARRISBURG, CITY OF
HELIX, CITY OF
HEPPNER, CITY OF
HERMISTON, CITY OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HINES, CITY OF
HOOD RIVER COUNTY *
HOOD RIVER, CITY OF
HUBBARD, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON,CITY OF
IDANHA, CITY OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
IONE, CITY OF
IRRIGON, CITY OF
ISLAND CITY, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JEFFERSON, CITY OF
JOHN DAY, CITY OF
JORDAN VALLEY, CITY OF
JOSEPH, CITY OF
JOSEPHINE COUNTY *
JUNCTION CITY, CITY OF
KEIZER, CITY OF
KING CITY, CITY OF
KLAMATH COUNTY *
KLAMATH FALLS, CITY OF
LA GRANDE, CITY OF
LAFAYETTE, CITY OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF
LAKESIDE, CITY OF
LAKEVIEW, CITY OF
LANE COUNTY*
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LINCOLN CITY, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LINN COUNTY*
LONG CREEK, CITY OF
LOSTINE, CITY OF
LOWELL, CITY OF
LYONS, CITY OF
MADRAS, CITY OF
County
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
HARNEY COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HARNEY COUNTY
HOOD RIVER
COUNTY
HOOD RIVER
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
MALHEUR COUNTY
WALLOWA COUNTY
JOSEPHINE COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KLAMATH COUNTY
KLAMATH COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WALLOWA COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/04/79(R)
04/17/84(R)
02/03/82(R)
06/01/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
10/28/77(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/28/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
04/05/88(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/26/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/01/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
07/17/89(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/19/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/01/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
08/15/79(R)
02/11/76(R)
12/18/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/15/82(R)
12/05/89(R)
08/04/87(R)
08/01/84(R)
11/16/82(R)
12/18/85(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/17/78(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
12/15/81(R)
07/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/04/79(M)
04/17/84
02/03/82
06/01/84
02/15/84
09/29/86
05/17/82
11/03/89
09/24/84(M)
09/24/84(M)
01/19/00
06/03/88
01/19/00
12/19/95
04/03/84
(NSFHA)
09/30/87
09/15/93
12/04/79
07/17/89
01/19/00
02/23/82
09/19/84
02/17/88
09/27/91
06/02/99
01/19/00
(NSFHA)
12/18/84
06/05/85
04/03/96
06/15/82
12/05/89
08/04/87
08/01/84
09/05/90
06/02/99
09/01/83
07/05/84
08/17/98
09/03/80
09/29/86
09/24/84(M)
02/17/88
(NSFHA)
12/15/81
07/17/89
Page 3 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410149#
410199#
410154#
410233#
410255#
410096#
410143#
410284#
410210B
410019#
410247#
410020
410190#
410010#
410079#
410173#
410234#
410165
410080#
410179#
410064#
410047#
410200#
410256#
410131#
410048#
410270#
410221#
410151B
410271#
410126#
410152#
410021#
410117#
410211#
410011#
410097#
410212#
410186#
410272#
410183#
410049B
410082#
410037#
410051#
Community Name
MALHEUR COUNTY*
MANZANITA, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY*
MAUPIN, CITY OF
MCMINNVILLE, CITY OF
MEDFORD, CITY OF
MILL CITY, CITY OF
MILLERSBURG, CITY OF
MILTON-FREEWATER, CITY OF
MILWAUKIE, CITY OF
MITCHELL, CITY OF
MOLALLA, CITY OF
MONMOUTH, CITY OF
MONROE, CITY OF
MONUMENT, CITY OF
MORROW COUNTY *
MOSIER, CITY OF
MT. ANGEL, CITY OF
MT. VERNON, CITY OF
MULTNOMAH COUNTY*
MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF
MYRTLE POINT, CITY OF
NEHALEM, CITY OF
NEWBERG, CITY OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NORTH BEND, CITY OF
NORTH PLAINS, CITY OF
NORTH POWDER, CITY OF
NYSSA, CITY OF
OAKLAND, CITY OF
OAKRIDGE, CITY OF
ONTARIO, CITY OF
OREGON CITY, CITY OF
PAISLEY, CITY OF
PENDLETON, CITY OF
PHILOMATH, CITY OF
PHOENIX, CITY OF
PILOT ROCK, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY*
PORT ORFORD, CITY OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POWERS, CITY OF
PRAIRIE CITY, CITY OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
PRINEVILLE, CITY OF
County
MALHEUR COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
MORROW COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MALHEUR COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
MALHEUR COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CURRY COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COOS COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CROOK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/86(R)
05/01/78(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
03/01/79(R)
07/21/82(R)
09/12/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
04/17/89(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/05/88(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
02/17/89(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/18/87(R)
06/15/82(R)
02/15/78(R)
07/16/84(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/01/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
08/01/84(R)
04/01/82(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/14/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
04/17/84(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/15/89(R)
07/13/76(R)
06/15/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
08/04/88(R)
02/15/78(R)
01/29/80(R)
10/15/80(R)
06/30/76(R)
02/17/88(R)
08/16/88(R)
07/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/29/86
01/12/82
01/19/00
09/24/84(M)
12/01/82
02/23/82
03/01/79
06/15/82
09/12/78(M)
06/18/80
04/17/89
(NSFHA)
12/19/95
01/03/86(M)
09/24/84(M)
07/05/84
02/17/89
09/18/87
03/18/86
12/28/82
07/16/84
12/07/82
03/01/82
06/15/82
08/01/84
03/16/89
09/29/78
12/14/82(M)
06/19/85(M)
06/02/99
04/17/84
02/15/80
09/15/89
07/15/88
06/15/82
05/03/82
08/04/88
12/19/95
01/29/80(M)
01/03/86
06/30/76(M)
02/17/88
08/16/88
07/17/89
Page 4 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410038#
410065#
410066#
410022#
410201#
410098#
410067#
410194#
410167
410023#
410039#
410144#
410168
410032#
410081#
410099#
410257#
410191#
410273#
410132#
410169
410058#
410248#
415592#
410040#
410166
410213#
410170
410222#
410007#
410275
410146#
410100#
410147#
410237#
410276#
410196#
410202#
410133#
410184#
410277#
410171
410279#
410204#
410214#
410216#
410223#
Community Name
RAINIER, CITY OF
REEDSPORT, CITY OF
RIDDLE, CITY OF
RIVERGROVE,CITY OF
ROCKAWAY, CITY OF
ROGUE RIVER, CITY OF
ROSEBURG, CITY OF
RUFUS, CITY OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SANDY, CITY OF
SCAPPOOSE, CITY OF
SCIO, CITY OF
SCOTTS MILLS, CITY OF
SEASIDE, CITY OF
SENECA, CITY OF
SHADY COVE, CITY OF
SHERIDAN, CITY OF
SHERMAN COUNTY *
SHERWOOD, TOWN OF
SILETZ, CITY OF
SILVERTON, CITY OF
SISTERS, CITY OF
SPRAY, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
ST. HELENS, CITY OF
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
STANFIELD, CITY OF
STAYTON, CITY OF
SUMMERVILLE, CITY OF
SUMPTER, CITY OF
SUTHERLIN, CITY OF
SWEET HOME, CITY OF
TALENT, CITY OF
TANGENT, CITY OF
THE DALLES, CITY OF
TIGARD, CITY OF
TILLAMOOK COUNTY *
TILLAMOOK, CITY OF
TOLEDO, CITY OF
TROUTDALE, CITY OF
TUALATIN, CITY OF
TURNER, CITY OF
UKIAH, CITY OF
UMATILLA COUNTY*
UMATILLA, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY *
UNION, CITY OF
County
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
DESCHUTES COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BAKER COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/16/88(R)
04/03/84(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/04/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
12/11/79(R)
08/16/88(R)
08/01/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/06/82(R)
03/01/79(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/01/84(R)
08/15/84(R)
03/01/79(R)
01/15/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/21/97(R)
03/01/82(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/17/82(R)
01/18/84(R)
03/01/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
05/01/78(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
02/17/82(R)
04/02/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/15/80(R)
12/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/16/88
04/03/84
02/18/98
08/04/87
10/12/82
01/02/81
04/21/99
09/24/84(M)
01/19/00
07/19/00(M)
08/16/88
08/01/84
01/19/00
10/27/81
09/24/84(M)
09/30/80
09/30/88
09/24/84(M)
01/06/82
03/01/79
01/19/00
06/08/98
08/16/88(M)
06/02/99
08/16/88
09/04/86
01/19/00
01/15/80(M)
06/03/88
(NSFHA)
03/01/82
01/19/82
05/17/82
01/18/84(M)
03/01/82
09/28/90
12/23/80
03/01/79
08/03/98
02/19/87
01/19/00
09/24/84(M)
09/08/99
09/24/84(M)
04/03/96
12/15/78
Page 5 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
410153#
410128#
410041#
410134#
410224#
410228#
410291
410033#
410229B
410195#
410238#
410148
410024#
410289#
410215#
410245#
410203#
410258#
410025#
415593#
410185
410172
410135#
410249#
410259#
410069
Community Name
VALE, CITY OF
VENETA,CITY OF
VERNONIA, CITY OF
WALDPORT, CITY OF
WALLOWA COUNTY*
WALLOW A, CITY OF
WARM SPRING RESERVATION, TRIBE OF
WARRENTON, CITY OF
Includes the City of Hammond
WASCO COUNTY *
WASCO, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WATERLOO, CITY OF
WEST LINN, CITY OF
WESTFIR, CITY OF
WESTON, CITY OF
WHEELER COUNTY *
WHEELER, CITY OF
WILLAMINA, CITY OF
WILSONVILLE, CITY OF
WINSTON, CITY OF
WOOD VILLAGE, CITY OF
WOODBURN, CITY OF
YACHATS, CITY OF
YAMHILL COUNTY *
YAMHILL, CITY OF
YONCALLA, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
MALHEUR COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WALLOWA COUNTY
WALLOWA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
CLATSOP COUNTY
WASCO COUNTY
SHERMAN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LINN COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
LANE COUNTY
UMATILLA COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
TILLAMOOK COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
CLACKAMAS
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MULTNOMAH
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
YAMHILL COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
257
256
12
34
1
0
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/87(R)
02/01/84(R)
08/16/88(R)
03/15/79(R)
02/17/88(R)
02/17/88(R)
08/11/97
05/15/78(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/15/89(R)
09/30/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/06/85(R)
09/18/87(R)
07/17/89(R)
11/16/77(R)
03/15/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/14/73(R)
1 1/20/85(R)
03/01/79(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/30/83(R)
03/01/82(R)
08/21/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/87
06/02/99
08/16/88
03/15/79
02/17/88
02/17/88
05/15/78
09/24/84(M)
09/15/89
03/18/87
(NSFHA)
03/15/77
06/02/99
09/18/87
07/17/89
11/16/77
03/15/82
02/19/87
10/20/81
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
03/01/79
09/30/83
03/01/82
(NSFHA)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 7 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421971#
421157#
422453#
420695#
421415#
421433#
42203 1#
420541#
422508A
42246 1#
420166#
421046#
42 1047 A
422409#
420584B
42040 1#
421266#
421667A
42048 1#
420101#
42 1972 A
42096 1#
422341 A
422265A
422509A
422529A
420869#
421928#
420845#
420585#
421534#
421376#
420159#
420947#
420102#
422615#
420124#
421360#
421850A
420570#
420971 A
421232A
421385#
Communities
Community Name
"PENNSYLVANIA
ABBOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
ABBOTTSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
ABINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ABINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ADAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
ADAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
ADAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
ADAMSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
ADDISON, TOWNSHIP OF
AKRON, BOROUGH OF
ALBA, BOROUGH OF
ALBANY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALBANY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALBION, BOROUGH OF
ALBURTIS, BOROUGH OF
ALDAN, BOROUGH OF
ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF
ALEPPO, TOWNSHIP OF
ALEXANDRIA, BOROUGH OF
ALIQUIPPA, CITY OF
ALLEGANY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEGHENY, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
ALLENPORT, BOROUGH OF
ALLENTOWN, CITY OF
ALLISON, TOWNSHIP OF
ALSACE, TOWNSHIP OF
ALTOONA, CITY OF
AMBLER, BOROUGH OF
AMBRIDGE, BOROUGH OF
AMELL, TOWNSHIP OF
AMITY, TOWNSHIP OF
AMITY, TOWNSHIP OF
ANNIN, TOWNSHIP OF
ANNVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
ANTHONY, TOWNSHIP OF
ANTHONY, TOWNSHIP OF
ANTIS, TOWNSHIP OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
POTTER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/01/86(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
04/17/89(R)
08/15/90(R)
01/03/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
06/01/89(R)
12/16/80(R)
07/23/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/01/86(R)
06/19/89(R)
12/15/78(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/24/84(R)
02/01/80(R)
02/01/80(R)
12/01/86(R)
04/03/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
03/18/86(R)
06/01/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/19/81(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/03/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
03/02/83(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
02/01/80(R)
09/15/89(R)
07/18/77(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/01/86(R)
06/01/87(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/01/86(L)
09/02/81
09/30/81
12/19/96
04/17/89
08/15/90
01/03/86(M)
01/16/81
06/01/89(L)
12/16/80
07/23/82(M)
05/21/01
05/01/86(L)
06/19/89
12/15/78(M)
09/30/93
10/04/95
08/24/84(M)
02/01/80
02/01/80
12/01/86(L)
04/03/85
05/01/85(M)
03/18/86(M)
06/01/89(L)
09/10/84(M)
11/20/00
04/06/01
11/16/95
01/06/95
07/06/98
05/21/01
07/16/87
12/19/96
02/01/80
09/15/89
05/21/01
1 1/04/88
08/01/87(L)
04/15/77
12/01/86(L)
06/01/87(L)
02/04/81
Page Iof55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421233#
422072#
420092
420093#
422073#
420524#
422292A
421879#
421396#
421708#
420635#
420870#
420871#
420765#
42236 1#
420596#
422266#
420005#
421602#
421048#
420273#
420167#
420976#
421562#
420766#
422074
420760#
4203 18#
420597#
421473#
420872#
422428#
420103#
4203 19#
420007#
422650#
420716#
421452A
422435A
420227#
421643#
422440#
421434B
421683#
Community Name
ANTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF
APOLACON, TOWNSHIP OF
APOLLO, BOROUGH OF
APPLEWOLD, BOROUGH OF
ARARAT, TOWNSHIP OF
ARCHBALD, BOROUGH OF
ARENDSTVILLE,BOROUGH OF
ARMAGH, TOWNSHIP OF
ARMENIA, TOWNSHIP OF
ARMSTRONG, TOWNSHIP OF
ARMSTRONG, TOWNSHIP OF
ARNOLD, CITY OF
ARONA, BOROUGH OF
ASHLAND, BOROUGH OF
ASHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
ASHLEY, BOROUGH OF
ASHVILLE, BOROUGH OF
ASPINWALL, BOROUGH OF
ASTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ASYLUM, TOWNSHIP OF
ATGLEN, BOROUGH OF
ATHENS, BOROUGH OF
ATHENS, TOWNSHIP OF
ATHENS, TOWNSHIP OF
AUBURN, BOROUGH OF
AUBURN, TOWNSHIP OF
AUSTIN, BOROUGH OF
AVIS, BOROUGH OF
AVOCA, BOROUGH OF
AVONDALE, BOROUGH OF
AVONMORE, BOROUGH OF
AYR, TOWNSHIP OF
BADEN, BOROUGH OF
BALD EAGLE, TOWNSHIP OF
BALDWIN, BOROUGH OF
BALDWIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BANGOR, BOROUGH OF
BANKS, TOWNSHIP OF
BANKS, TOWNSHIP OF
BARNESBORO, BOROUGH OF
BARNETT, TOWNSHIP OF
BARNETT, TOWNSHIP OF
BARR, TOWNSHIP OF
BARREE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/24/8 1(R)
07/17/89(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/18/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
01/16/80(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/19/91(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/16/90(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
12/01/86(R)
08/01/90(R)
01/17/85(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/01/85(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/15/80(R)
12/04/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
04/01/80(R)
07/02/82(R)
05/17/89(R)
04/01/86(R)
08/19/91(R)
01/16/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
11/04/87(R)
01/20/82(R)
07/02/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/15/78(R)
10/30/78(R)
02/02/77(R)
10/01/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/15/89(R)
12/01/86(R)
08/24/84(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/24/8 1(M)
07/17/89
(NSFHA)
09/18/87
05/01/86(L)
01/16/80
08/19/85(M)
08/19/91
09/01/86(L)
04/16/90
09/28/79
1 1/20/00
08/05/97
09/17/92
01/17/85(M)
09/30/80
11/03/89
07/05/00
09/30/93
08/15/80
1 1/20/96
03/02/89
04/01/80
07/02/82(M)
1 1/06/96
04/01/86(L)
08/19/91
01/16/80
07/16/81
11/20/96
08/05/97
02/09/01
09/28/79
02/04/81
10/04/95
10/04/95
04/06/01
10/01/86(L)
09/10/84(M)
09/15/89
12/01/86(L)
08/24/84(M)
10/15/85(M)
09/10/84(M)
Page 2 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421884#
421997A
421761#
422472A
420717#
42 173 8 A
422129B
421136#
420105#
420247
420104#
422362#
421547B
422385#
422441 A
422032B
420805B
421512#
420126#
421228#
421331#
421049#
420320#
42032 1#
421659#
420008#
421513#
422244
422185#
420457#
420257B
420009#
420160#
42001 1#
4200 10#
422293#
4226 12#
421460#
420181#
420793#
420846#
421543#
421037#
421749 A
4221 5 8#
421050#
421051#
420338#
421160#
Community Name
BARRETT, TOWNSHIP OF
BARRY, TOWNSHIP OF
BART, TOWNSHIP OF
BASTRESS, TOWNSHIP OF
BATH, BOROUGHS OF
BEALE, TOWNSHIP OF
BEALLSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BEAR CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER FALLS, CITY OF
BEAVER MEADOWS, BOROUGH OF
BEAVER, BOROUGH OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEAVERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
BECCARIA, TOWNSHIP OF
BECHTELSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BEDFORD, BOROUGH OF
BEDFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BEDMINSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
BEECH CREEK, BOROUGH OF
BEECH CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
BELFAST, TOWNSHIP OF
BELL ACRES, BOROUGH OF
BELL, TOWNSHIP OF
BELL, TOWNSHIP OF
BELL, TOWNSHIP OF
BELLE VERNON, BOROUGH OF
BELLEFONTE BOROUGH OF
BELLEVUE, BOROUGH OF
BELLWOOD, BOROUGH OF
BEN AVON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
BEN AVON, BOROUGH OF
BENDERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BENEZETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
BENNER, TOWNSHIP OF
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP OF
BENSON, BOROUGH OF
BENTLEYVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BENTON, BOROUGH OF
BENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BENTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BERLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BERN, TOWNSHIP OF
BERNVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BERWICK, BOROUGH OF
BERWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
County
MONROE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/02/88(R)
05/01/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/05/79(R)
01/17/85(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/10/82(R)
02/01/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
05/15/84(R)
09/02/88(R)
10/17/89(R)
12/01/83(R)
08/02/90(R)
09/05/90(R)
08/05/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/03/89(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/02/77(R)
12/15/78(R)
06/01/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/16/81(R)
04/20/79(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/05/89(R)
07/17/78(R)
05/17/90(R)
06/17/86(R)
10/18/83(R)
08/01/78(R)
06/01/86(R)
07/15/88(R)
11/19/80(R)
01/26/83(R)
08/03/89(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/02/88
05/01/86(L)
01/16/81
09/24/84(M)
04/06/01
09/10/84(M)
09/24/84(M)
09/29/78
05/17/82
(NSFHA)
09/05/79
01/17/85(M)
11/15/85(M)
09/10/82(M)
02/01/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
08/19/85(M)
07/04/89
05/21/01
09/02/88
10/17/89
06/20/01 >
08/02/90
09/05/90
08/05/85(M)
10/04/95
08/03/89
04/01/86(L)
08/05/97
11/16/95
02/02/77
10/04/95
06/01/79(M)
10/04/95
10/04/95
04/20/79(M)
06/01/87(L)
06/05/89
06/20/01 >
05/17/90
06/17/86
08/19/97
04/17/85
06/01/86(L)
07/15/88
05/21/01
05/21/01
08/03/89
05/19/87
Page 3 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422627#
422566#
4200 12#
421300#
421052#
421606#
422429#
420967#
42071 8#
420980#
422307#
420508#
421514#
422649
421973A
420127#
421474#
420402#
420598#
42 1709 A
422510#
421435A
420747B
422141#
421386#
420495
420525#
420013#
422379B
420748#
421332#
42 1563 A
421962#
421559
420339#
422094A
420817#
420767#
421301A
421193#
421515
420873#
422294#
420794B
420248#
Community Name
BESSEMER, BOROUGH OF
BETHANY, BOROUGH OF
BETHEL PARK, BOROUGH OF
BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
BETHLEHEM, CITY OF
BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF
BIG BEAVER, BOROUGH OF
BIG RUN, BOROUGH OF
BIGLER, TOWNSHIP OF
BIGLERVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BIRDSBORO BOROUGH OF
BIRMINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BIRMINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BLACK CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
BLACK LICK, TOWNSHIP OF
BLACK, TOWNSHIP OF
BLACKLICK, TOWNSHIP OF
BLAIN, BOROUGH OF
ELAINE, TOWNSHIP OF
BLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
BLAIRSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BLAKELY, BOROUGH OF
BLAWNOX, BOROUGH OF
BLOOM, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOOMFIELD, BOROUGH OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOOMING GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOOMING VALLEY, BOROUGH OF
BLOOMSBURG TOWN OF
BLOSS, TOWNSHIP OF
BLOSSBURG, BOROUGH OF
BLYTHE, TOWNSHIP OF
BOGGS, TOWNSHIP OF
BOGGS, TOWNSHIP OF
BOGGS, TOWNSHIP OF
BOLIVAR, BOROUGH OF
BONNEAUVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BOSWELL, BOROUGH OF
BOWMANSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
County
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/09/82(R)
1 1/06/8 1(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/03/88(R)
07/15/88(R)
08/10/79(R)
06/11/82(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/03/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/04/90(R)
11/16/90(R)
09/28/78(R)
06/01/87(R)
12/18/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/24/77(R)
07/02/82(R)
01/18/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/01/78(R)
10/05/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
10/18/88(R)
11/17/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
06/15/77(R)
11/01/86(R)
08/15/89(R)
04/01/86(R)
08/10/79(R)
08/03/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/03/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/09/82(M)
1 1/06/8 1(M)
07/05/00
06/03/88
05/21/01
09/30/93
06/11/82(M)
09/30/81
04/06/01
04/06/01
05/17/82
06/04/90
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
05/21/01
11/20/96
09/30/93
09/03/80
08/19/86(M)
08/02/90
10/15/85(M)
06/24/77(M)
07/02/82(M)
01/18/84
(NSFHA)
01/16/80
07/05/00
08/24/84(M)
03/01/78
10/05/84(M)
09/01/86(L)
10/06/00
(NSFHA)
05/01/80
03/01/87(L)
07/16/80
06/15/77
11/01/86(L)
12/15/90
04/01/86(L)
08/05/97
08/03/81
09/24/84(M)
09/03/82(M)
Page 4 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420128#
4200 14#
4200 16#
420015#
421262#
420665#
421516
422245#
42224 IB
421517A
421684#
421169#
421302#
421008#
421998#
421153#
421053#
421762#
4200 17#
420340#
421548#
420948#
420182#
4200 18#
420106#
422585A
422309A
420297B
420183#
420984#
420483
421333#
420509#
422115#
421171A
420403#
422075A
420510#
42251 1A
420636#
420683#
422654
42045 8#
421621#
420211 A
421660#
421710#
Community Name
BOYERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
BRACKENRIDGE, BOROUGH OF
BRADDOCK HILLS, BOROUGH OF
BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF
BRADFORD WOODS, BOROUGH OF
BRADFORD, CITY OF
BRADFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADY, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADY, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADY, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADY, TOWNSHIP OF
BRADYS BEND, TOWNSHIP OF
BRAINTRIM, TOWNSHIP OF
BRANCH, TOWNSHIP OF
BRATTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BRECKNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
BRECKNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
BRENTWOOD, BOROUGH OF
BRIAR CREEK, BOROUGH OF
BRIAR CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGEPORT, BOROUGH OF
BRIDGETON TOWNSHIP OF
BRIDGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BRIDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF
BRIDGEWATER, CITY OF
BRIGHTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BRISBIN, BOROUGH OF
BRISTOL BOROUGH OF
BRISTOL, TOWNSHIP OF
BROAD TOP CITY, BOROUGH OF
BROAD TOP, TOWNSHIP OF
BROCKWAY, BOROUGH OF
BROKENSTRAW, TOWNSHIP OF
BROOKFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
BROOKHAVEN, BOROUGH OF
BROOKLYN, TOWNSHIP OF
BROOKVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BROTHERSVALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
BROWN, TOWNSHIP OF
BROWN, TOWNSHIP OF
BROWNSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
BROWNSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
BROWNSVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
BRUIN, BOROUGH OF
BRUSH CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
BRUSH VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
County
BERKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/25/76(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
1 1/06/8 1(R)
09/16/81(R)
04/01/86(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/19/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
02/17/89(R)
07/16/79(R)
07/03/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/04/82(R)
12/15/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/01/81(R)
02/02/84(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/19/89(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/05/84(R)
05/01/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/21/78(R)
06/04/90(R)
07/03/90(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
12/01/86(R)
02/14/76(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/16/91(R)
08/19/85(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
08/19/91(R)
10/30/78(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/01/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/21/01
07/05/00
10/04/95
10/04/95
10/04/95
09/16/81
04/01/86(L)
09/16/81
06/19/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
02/17/89
07/16/79
07/03/86
05/15/80
06/04/82(M)
12/15/78(M)
05/21/01
04/01/81
10/04/95
02/16/95
06/19/89
08/09/99
06/20/01 >
10/04/95
05/01/80
05/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
08/03/84(M)
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
(NSFHA)
06/04/90
07/03/90
03/18/91
12/01/86(L)
09/30/93
05/01/86(L)
04/16/91
08/19/85(M)
03/02/81
08/19/91
(NSFHA)
11/16/95
11/16/95
05/01/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
08/19/86(M)
Page 5 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421899#
421824#
420985#
422159#
421416#
421948#
421237A
421200#
421711A
421622#
421303A
420847#
420168#
421054#
420684#
420298#
421461#
421518A
421213#
421929#
4202 12#
42 1247 A
421138#
420599#
421999#
421304A
421055#
421763#
420848#
420213#
422247#
421436A
420346#
421564#
420357#
422108#
422160#
421713A
420849#
420169A
421397#
421201#
421685#
Community Name
BRYN ATHYN, BOROUGH OF
BUCK, TOWNSHIP OF
BUCKINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BUCKINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
BUFFINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BULLSKIN, TOWNSHIP OF
BUNELL TOWNSHIP OF
BURGETTSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
BURLINGTON, BOROUGH OF
BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
BURNHAM, BOROUGH OF
BURNSIDE, BOROUGH OF
BURNSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
BURNSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF
BURRELL, TOWNSHIP OF
BUSHKILL, TOWNSHIP OF
BUTLER CITY OF
BUTLER, TOWNSHIP OF
BUTLER, TOWNSHIP OF
BUTLER, TOWNSHIP OF
BUTLER, TOWNSHIP OF
CADOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
CAERNARVON, TOWNSHIP OF
CAERNARVON, TOWNSHIP OF
CALIFORNIA, BOROUGH OF
CALLELRY, BOROUGH OF
CALN, TOWNSHIP OF
CAMBRIA, TOWNSHIP OF
CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, BOROUGH OF
CAMBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF
CAMP HILL, BOROUGH OF
CANAL, TOWNSHIP OF
CANNAN, TOWNSHIP OF
CANOE, TOWNSHIP OF
CANONSBURG, BOROUGH OF
CANTON, BOROUGH OF
CANTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CANTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CARBON, TOWNSHIP OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/17/82(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
03/15/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/18/84(R)
08/15/80(R)
04/01/77(R)
06/11/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/16/91(R)
11/01/86(R)
02/17/89(R)
09/05/90(R)
09/05/90(R)
02/15/78(R)
07/17/89(R)
01/17/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
03/04/88(R)
04/17/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/03/78(R)
12/16/80(R)
11/16/90(R)
06/05/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/19/81(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/17/89(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/02/90(R)
09/10/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/01/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
06/11/82(R)
11/05/86(R)
06/19/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/19/96
04/15/81
06/20/01 >
08/16/93
01/18/84
08/15/80
04/01/77
06/11/82(M)
08/01/86(L)
04/16/91
11/01/86(L)
02/17/89
09/05/90
09/05/90
02/15/78
07/17/89
01/17/86(M)
08/01/86(L)
08/19/86(M)
04/06/01
02/01/84
08/19/85(M)
07/03/78
12/16/80
08/03/92
06/05/85(M)
05/21/01
05/19/81
09/06/95
04/17/89
1 1/20/96
09/04/85(M)
08/02/90
06/04/90
12/11/81
02/06/91
09/30/87
08/01/86(L)
04/01/80
05/01/86(L)
06/11/82(M)
11/05/86
06/19/89
Page 6 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420526#
421750#
425382#
420475#
4200 19#
422635#
421949#
422142#
4222 16#
422267
421837A
421686#
422000#
421426#
420795A
420322#
420020#
420586#
42034 1#
420342#
420962#
422143#
4223 10#
421668A
420496#
422591#
421417#
420129#
420347A
422552#
420796#
421544
420258
421056#
422498#
421853#
42002 1#
420184#
420469#
4222 17#
420323#
42225 1#
422034#
420850#
421172#
421475#
Community Name
CARBONDALE, CITY OF
CARBONDALE, TOWNSHIP OF
CARLISLE, BOROUGH OF
CARMICHAELS, BOROUGH OF
CARNEGIE, BOROUGH OF
CARROLL VALLEY, BOROUGH OF
CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF
CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF
CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF
CARROLLTOWN, BOROUGH OF
CASCADE, TOWNSHIP OF
CASS, TOWNSHIP OF
CASS, TOWNSHIP OF
CASSANDRA, BOROUGH OF
CASSELMAN,BOROUGH OF
CASTANEA TOWNSHIP OF
CASTLE SHANNON, BOROUGH OF
CATASAUQUA, BOROUGH OF
CATAWISSA, BOROUGH OF
CATAWISSA, TOWNSHIP OF
CATHARINE, TOWNSHIP OF
CECIL, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTER, TOWNSLHIP OF
CENTERPORT, BOROUGH OF
CENTER VILLE, BOROUGH OF
CENTER VILLE, BOROUGH OF
CENTRAL CITY, BOROUGH OF
CENTRALIA, BOROUGH OF
CENTRE HALL, BOROUGH OF
CENTRE, TOWNSHIP OF
CENTRE, TOWNSHIP OF
CERES, TOWNSHIP OF
CHALFANT, BOROUGH OF
CHALFONT, BOROUGHS OF
CHAMBERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
CHANCEFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CHAPMAN TOWNSHIP
CHAPMAN, BOROUGH OF
CHAPMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
CHARLEROI, BOROUGH OF
CHARLESTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CHARLESTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/16/80(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/01/72(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/02/88(R)
09/04/87(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
06/30/76(R)
12/01/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
05/17/89(R)
03/05/90(R)
09/10/84(R)
02/02/77(R)
03/30/79(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/14/79(R)
09/14/79(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/86(R)
02/15/78(R)
03/16/88(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/16/82(R)
05/01/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/18/90(R)
04/30/84(R)
08/21/85(R)
12/16/80(R)
06/01/81(R)
09/18/87(R)
10/30/78(R)
12/28/76(R)
07/17/78(R)
10/15/81(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/30/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/04/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/16/80
09/30/81
02/03/82
09/28/79(M)
10/04/95
09/02/88
09/21/98
12/05/95
03/02/81
(NSFHA)
12/01/86(L)
11/01/85(M)
05/17/89
03/05/90
09/10/84(M)
01/21/98
10/04/95
11/01/79
09/14/79
10/05/79
08/01/80
09/05/79
06/15/81
05/01/86(L)
01/18/84
03/16/88
06/19/89
05/21/01
05/01/86(L)
12/05/95
06/18/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/21/01
06/01/81
09/18/87
10/04/95
06/20/01 >
07/17/78
09/22/99
12/18/79
04/06/01
01/06/82
01/19/96
12/01/86(L)
1 1/20/96
Page 7 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422144#
42 1173 A
422058#
420696#
422161A
420497B
422342#
421714
422530A
422604#
421519#
420406#
420299#
420404#
420405#
421885#
420022#
4202 14#
422311 A
422076#
420542#
420023#
420024#
42197 A A
421221B
42 1500 A
421507A
422475#
422454A
420527#
420476#
422343A
421687#
421764#
420300#
422344A
421437#
420571#
421000#
422077#
420407#
421751#
422345#
420637#
42253 1#
422162#
Community Name
CHARTIERS, TWONSHIP OF
CHATHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
CHEERY, TOWNSHIP OF
CHELTENHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRY RIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRY TREE, BOROUGH OF
CHERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRYHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
CHERRYTREE, TOWNSHIP OF
CHEST, TOWNSHIP OF
CHEST, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESTER HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
CHESTER HILL, BOROUGH OF
CHESTER, CITY OF
CHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESTNUTHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
CHESWICK, BOROUGH OF
CHICORA, BOROUGH OF
CHIPPEWA, TOWNSHIP OF
CHOCONUT, TOWNSHIP OF
CHRISTIANA, BOROUGH OF
CHURCHILL, BOROUGH OF
CLAIRTON, CITY OF
CLARA, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARENDON, BOROUGH OF
CLARION, BOROUGH OF
CLARION, TOWNSHIP OF
CLARK, BOROUGH OF
CLARKS GREEN, BOROUGH OF
CLARKS SUMMIT, BOROUGH OF
CLARKSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
CLEARFIELD, BOROUGH OF
CLEARFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
CLEARFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
CLEONA, BOROUGH OF
CLEVELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
CLIFFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CLIFTON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
CLIFTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/01/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/01/87(R)
ll/22/76(R)
12/04/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/01/85(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/01/86(R)
01/16/80(R)
11/02/90(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/15/84(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/15/89(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/15/78(R)
10/16/79(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/17/85(R)
11/01/86(R)
11/01/86(R)
07/30/82(R)
06/25/76(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/16/88(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/05/90(R)
04/01/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/16/89(R)
05/16/77(R)
02/02/90(R)
12/11/81(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/10/84(R)
02/04/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/01/80
06/01/87(L)
08/01/87(L)
12/19/96
12/04/85(M)
06/17/86
05/01/85(M)
04/01/86(L)
01/01/87(L)
09/10/84(M)
08/01/86(L)
09/30/93
11/02/90
09/30/93
09/30/93
02/17/88
07/05/00
08/10/79(M)
09/01/86(L)
11/15/89
04/15/81
10/04/95
08/05/97
06/01/87(L)
04/17/85(M)
11/01/86(L)
11/01/86(L)
07/30/82(M)
06/25/76(M)
01/07/00
09/16/81
05/01/85(M)
08/16/88
12/16/80
09/05/79
04/17/85(M)
03/05/90
04/01/77
08/01/79
03/16/89
09/30/93
02/02/90
12/11/81(M)
09/28/79
09/10/84(M)
02/04/83(M)
Page 8 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422197#
422532A
422442#
420498#
421174#
422131#
421936#
420118#
420768
420484#
42030 1#
420274#
420348#
421142#
42 183 8 A
420324#
421057#
421334#
421765#
420259#
421900#
422059#
421058#
420408#
420543#
421059A
422116#
420409#
422346A
420410#
422410#
420349#
421438#
421715A
422047#
420544#
421248#
422406#
4209 18#
422117#
422043#
422386#
422387#
421361#
420459#
421623#
421418A
421413
420545#
Community Name
CLINTON, TOWNSHIP OF
CLINTONVILLE, BOROUGH OF
CLOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
CLYMER, BOROUGH OF
CLYMER, TOWNSHIP OF
COAL CENTER, BOROUGH OF
COAL, TOWNSHIP OF
COALDALE, BOROUGH OF
COALDALE, BOROUGH OF
COALMONT, BOROUGH OF
COALPORT, BOROUGH OF
COATESVILLE, CITY OF
COCHRANTON, BOROUGH OF
CODORUS, TOWNSHIP OF
COGAN HOUSE, TOWNSHIP OF
COLEBROOK, TOWNSHIP OF
COLEBROOKDALE, TOWNSHIP OF
COLERAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
COLERAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
COLLEGE, TOWNSHIP OF
COLLEGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
COLLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
COLLIER, TOWNSHIP OF
COLLINGDALE, BOROUGH OF
COLUMBIA, BOROUGH OF
COLUMBIA, TOWNSHIP OF
COLUMBUS, TOWNSHIP OF
COLWYN, BOROUGH OF
CONCORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CONCORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CONCORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEAUTVILLE, BOROUGH OF
CONEMAUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEMAUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEMAUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
CONESTOGA, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEWAGO, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEWAGO, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEWAGO, TOWNSHIP OF
CONEWANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
CONFLUENCE, BOROUGH OF
CONNEAUT LAKE, BOROUGH OF
CONNEAUT, TOWNSHIP OF
CONNEAUT, TOWNSHIP OF
CONNELLSVILLE, CITY OF
CONNELLSVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
CONNONQUENESSING, TOWNSHIP OF
CONNOQUENESSING, BOROUGH OF
CONOY, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WYOMING COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
BEDFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/90(R)
09/10/84(R)
07/03/90(R)
09/15/77(R)
05/01/87(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/03/90(R)
04/16/90(R)
12/26/78(R)
08/03/89(R)
07/04/89(R)
05/17/82(R)
06/04/90(R)
07/05/83(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/84(R)
10/05/84(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/04/89(R)
02/15/80(R)
12/01/86(R)
03/15/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/01/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
11/05/82(R)
09/18/87(R)
08/02/90(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/04/90(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/04/88(R)
04/30/86(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/06/89(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/10/84(R)
11/15/89(R)
03/01/78(R)
07/16/91(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/03/84(R)
06/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/90
09/10/84(M)
07/03/90
09/15/77
05/01/87(L)
09/06/95
07/03/90
04/16/90
(NSFHA)
08/03/89
07/04/89
1 1/20/96
06/04/90
07/05/83
06/01/87(L)
06/15/81
05/21/01
10/05/84(M)
01/16/81
01/02/92
12/19/96
12/01/86(L)
10/04/95
09/30/93
09/22/99
09/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
09/30/93
05/01/85(M)
09/30/93
11/05/82(M)
09/18/87
08/02/90
06/17/86(M)
06/04/90
03/18/80
06/08/98
04/30/86
03/18/80
04/16/90
09/06/89
06/05/8 1(M)
09/10/84(M)
11/15/89
03/01/78
07/16/91
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
06/04/80
Page 9 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420949#
420107#
420992#
42 1549 A
420600B
422186#
421886#
421863#
42 1520 A
421920#
420587#
420835#
421807A
420025#
422533#
420968A
420447#
422473#
42076 1#
42060 1#
421521#
422455A
421175#
421230A
420026#
421217#
422109#
421356#
421535A
420499#
421060#
422644
422605#
420769#
421688#
422 145 A
422209#
421439#
421335#
421249#
421188#
42063 8#
420130#
421462#
420302#
422388#
421428#
Community Name
CONSHOHOCKEN, BOROUGH OF
CONWAY, BOROUGH OF
CONYNGHAM, BOROUGH OF
CONYNGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
CONYNGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
COOK, TOWNSHIP OF
COOLBOUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
COOLSPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
COOPER, TOWNSHIP OF
COOPER, TOWNSHIP OF
COOPERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
COOPERSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
COPLAY, BOROUGH OF
CORAOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF
CORNPLANTER, TOWNSHIP OF
CORNWALL, BOROUGH OF
CORRY, CITY OF
CORYDON, TOWNSHIP OF
COUDERSPORT, BOROUGH OF
COURTDALE, BOROUGH OF
COVINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
COVINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
COVINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
COWANSHANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
CRAFTON, BOROUGH OF
CRANBERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
CRANBERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
CRANESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
CRAWFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
CREEKSIDE, BOROUGH OF
CRESCENT, TOWNSHIP OF
CRESSON, BOROUGH OF
CRESSON, CITY OF
CRESSONA, BOROUGH OF
CROMWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
CROSS CREEK, TOWNSHIP
CROSS ROADS, BOROUGH OF
CROYLE, TOWNSHIP OF
CUMBERLAND VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
CUMBERLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
CUMMINGS, TOWNSHIP OF
CUMRU, TOWNSHIP OF
CURTIN, TOWNSHIP OF
CURWENSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
CUSSEWAGO, TOWNSHIP OF
DALE,BOROUGH OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/15/77(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
07/16/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
02/16/77(R)
04/17/85(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
09/17/82(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/30/82(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/15/79(R)
05/19/87(R)
08/05/85(R)
02/15/78(R)
03/01/87(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/01/79(R)
04/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/16/80(R)
11/01/86(R)
12/19/80(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/05/88(R)
06/19/89(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/05/89(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/26/78(R)
01/17/86(R)
08/01/77(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/01/87(R)
06/01/79(R)
08/15/90(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/01/86(R)
09/17/80(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/05/89(R)
07/04/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/02/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/09/99
1 1/04/88
07/16/80
10/15/85(M)
02/16/77
08/05/97
10/16/91
09/17/82(M)
08/01/86(L)
09/30/87
07/30/82(M)
02/06/91
06/25/76(M)
10/04/95
05/19/87
08/05/85(M)
02/15/78
03/01/87(L)
08/15/79
01/20/82(M)
04/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
07/16/80
11/01/86(L)
10/04/95
04/01/82
04/05/88
06/19/89
09/01/86(L)
12/05/89
10/04/95
(NSFHA)
01/17/86(M)
08/01/77
03/18/91
02/01/87(L)
06/01/79(M)
08/15/90
10/15/85(M)
09/30/81
09/20/95
09/17/80
05/21/01
06/05/89
07/04/89
09/10/84(M)
08/02/90
Page 10 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421825#
420602#
422739
420998#
422163#
420714#
42041 1#
421603#
4223 12A
422313#
420375B
422060#
420460#
421211B
421440#
421880#
421189#
422132B
422640#
421176A
422118#
422001 A
420690#
421739#
422283#
421010#
421177#
422177#
42221 1#
42227 1#
420546#
420874#
420376#
421168#
421135#
421205#
421580#
420528#
4209 19#
422078
421964#
421378#
422347A
Community Name
DALLAS, BOROUGH OF
DALLAS, TOWNSHIP OF
DALLASTOWN, BOROUGH OF
DALTON, BOROUGH OF
DAMACUS, TOWNSHIP OF
DANVILLE, BOROUGH OF
DARBY, BOROUGH OF
DARBY, TOWNSHIP OF
DARLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
DAUGHERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
DAUPHIN, BOROUGH OF
DAVIDSON, TOWNSHIP OF
DAWSON, BOROUGHS OF
DAYTON, BOROUGH OF
DEAN, TOWNSHIP OF
DECATUR, TONWSHIP OF
DECATUR, TOWNSHIP OF
DEEMSTON, BOROUGH OF
DEER LAKE, BOROUGH OF
DEERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
DEERFIELD, TOWSNHIP OF
DELANO, TOWNSHIP OF
DELAWARE WATER GAP, BOROUGH OF
DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
DELMAR, TOWNSHIP OF
DELMONT, BOROUGH OF
DELTA, BOROUGH OF
DENNISON, TOWNSHIP OF
DENVER, BOROUGH OF
DERRY, BOROUGH OF
DERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
DERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
DERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
DERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
DICKINSON, TOWNSHIP OF
DICKSON CITY, BOROUGH OF
DILLSBURG, BOROUGH OF
DIMOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
DINGMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
DISTRICT, TOWNSHIP OF
DONEGAL, TOWNSHIP OF
County
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
TIOGA COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/01/88(R)
09/27/96
11/01/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/18/77(R)
04/03/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/15/77(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
03/04/88(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/19/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/16/90(R)
05/01/85(R)
02/02/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/30/82(R)
11/19/80(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/01/83(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
04/20/79(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/01/86(R)
12/04/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/02/81
04/01/88(L)
11/01/78
09/30/88
10/16/84
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/01/86(L)
06/01/82
04/15/77
02/06/91
03/04/88
05/01/85(M)
06/19/89
06/01/87(L)
11/16/90
05/01/85(M)
02/02/89
06/01/87(L)
04/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
10/20/00
09/30/81
07/30/82(M)
11/19/80
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
09/01/83
04/15/81
04/15/81
08/05/97
09/30/77
09/01/78
06/29/79
08/05/97
12/19/95
01/16/80
09/30/82(M)
04/01/86(L)
10/06/00
05/21/01
02/15/85(M)
Page 11 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422146#
422187#
42085 1#
422630#
421826#
420131#
421911#
422569#
420920#
420275#
420185#
421410#
420027#
422164#
420245#
421766#
421661#
421689#
420303#
420639A
421681#
42046 1#
421624#
422095A
420749#
420161#
42243 1#
422133#
420529#
420325A
422250#
420028#
420186#
420603#
420810B
422165#
420132#
421767#
42098 1#
422252#
42000 1#
422140#
420276#
421501
421476#
Community Name
DONEGAL, TOWNSHIP OF
DONEGAL, TOWNSHIP OF
DONORA, BOROUGH OF
DORMONT, BOROUGH OF
DORRANCE, TOWNSHIP OF
DOUGLASS, TOWNSHIP OF
DOUGLASS, TOWNSHIP OF
DOVER, BOROUGH OF
DOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
DOWNINGTOWN, BOROUGH OF
DOYLESTOWN TOWNSHIP OF
DOYLESTOWN, BOROUGH OF
DRAVOSBURG, BOROUGH OF
DREHER, TOWNSHIP OF
DRIFTWOOD, BOROUGH OF
DRUMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
DUBOIS, CITY OF
DUBOISTOWN, BOROUGH OF
DUDLEY, BOROUGH OF
DUNBAR, BOROUGH OF
DUNBAR, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNCAN, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNCANNON, BOROUGH OF
DUNCANSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
DUNKARD, TOWNSHIP OF
DUNLEVY, BOROUGH OF
DUNMORE, BOROUGH OF
DUNNSTABLE, TOWNSHIP OF
DUPONT, BOROUGH OF
DUQUESNE, CITY OF
DURHAM TOWNSHIP OF
DURYEA, BOROUGH OF
DUSHORE, BOROUGH OF
DYBERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
EARL, TOWNSHIP OF
EARL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST ALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BANGOR, BOROUGH OF
EAST BERLIN, BOROUGH OF
EAST BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BRADFORD TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BRADY, BOROUGH OF
EAST BRAND YWINE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/82(R)
10/16/90(R)
06/10/80(R)
03/30/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/15/77(R)
05/15/84(R)
12/19/80(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/84(R)
06/15/79(R)
03/04/88(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/04/85(R)
12/01/78(R)
03/01/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/04/88(R)
07/04/88(R)
03/01/87(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/28/84(R)
10/05/84(R)
07/16/81(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/01/77(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/14/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
06/18/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
07/18/77(R)
12/16/80(R)
02/11/83(R)
02/12/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/16/81(R)
04/15/77(R)
06/30/76(R)
02/01/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/82(M)
08/05/97
09/30/95
10/04/95
08/15/80
05/21/01
12/19/96
12/19/80(M)
03/02/81
1 1/20/96
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
08/05/97
04/15/92
10/16/81
04/15/81
09/01/86(L)
12/04/85(M)
12/01/78
03/01/77
09/24/84(M)
03/18/91
07/04/88
03/01/87(L)
12/18/79
09/28/84
09/20/95
10/18/95
09/28/79
03/01/77
06/15/81
09/14/79
06/20/01 >
06/18/80
06/18/87(M)
09/30/87
05/21/01
12/16/80
04/06/01
04/06/01
07/16/81
10/18/95
11/20/96
(NSFHA)
11/20/96
Page 12 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422002#
421011#
420215#
421477#
421937A
422268#
422599#
420547#
422259#
421478#
421061#
421768#
421769#
421770#
421565#
421479#
422389#
422147#
421975#
421305#
420277#
421901#
420377#
421012#
420548#
4222 18#
422188#
421536A
421864#
421771#
420412#
422436A
42092 1#
421480#
42 1566 A
421481#
420950#
422003#
421482#
421013#
420359#
420549#
421483#
422662#
421336#
420108#
Community Name
EAST BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST BUTLER,BOROUGH OF
EAST CALN, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST CAMERON, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST CHILLISQUAQUE, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST COCALICO, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST CONEMAUGH,BOROUGH OF
EAST COVENTRY, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST DONEGAL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST DRUMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST EARL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST FINLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST FORK DISTRICT OF EULALIA
EAST FRANKLIN, TONWSHIP OF
EAST GOSHEN, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST GREENVILLE, BOROUGH OF
EAST HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST HEMPFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST HUNTINGDON,TOWNSHIP OF
EAST KEATING, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST LACKAWANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST LAMPETER, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST LANSDOWNE, BOROUGH OF
EAST MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST MANCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST MARLBOROUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST MEAD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST NANTMEAL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST NORRITON, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST NORWEGIAN, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST NOTTINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST PENNSBORO TOWNSHIP OF
EAST PETERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
EAST PIKELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST PITTSBURGH, BOROUGH OF
EAST PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST ROCHESTER, BOROUGH OF
County
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
CAMBRIA COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
LANCASTER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
EULALIA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/86(R)
02/02/77(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/05/90(R)
05/04/87(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/18/90(R)
02/17/82(R)
08/15/80(R)
01/16/80(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/18/90(R)
06/01/83(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/05/88(R)
07/05/77(R)
06/25/76(R)
01/16/80(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/16/81(R)
08/02/90(R)
10/01/86(R)
07/23/82(R)
12/16/80(R)
1 1/06/8 1(R)
08/01/86(R)
11/19/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/01/84(R)
09/30/77(R)
08/03/84(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/15/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/05/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
02/08/96(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/86(L)
03/15/84
03/18/91
11/20/96
09/01/86(L)
03/05/90
05/04/87
06/05/97
06/18/90
11/20/96
07/05/00
01/16/80
04/15/81
09/04/87
06/18/90
11/20/96
09/24/84(M)
05/01/85(M)
06/01/87(L)
04/05/88
1 1/20/96
12/19/96
01/16/80
08/15/79
09/28/79
04/15/81
08/05/97
10/01/86(L)
07/23/82(M)
12/16/80
(NSFHA)
08/01/86(L)
11/19/80
1 1/20/96
09/01/86(L)
11/20/96
12/19/96
11/02/95
11/20/96
07/30/82
04/15/77
09/05/79
1 1/20/96
10/04/95
06/19/89
07/16/81
Page 13 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420187#
422360A
421337#
42069 1#
421441#
422004A
420875#
420278#
422134
421716#
420279#
425383#
422600#
4223 14#
420909#
422348
422260
420109#
420413#
421772#
420032#
420414#
420448#
420604#
420228#
420852#
422592#
420666#
422443#
421839#
421854#
421887#
422005A
422546A
42241 1#
421263#
420033#
421773#
420550#
420378A
422412#
422365A
421154#
422119A
420818#
42206 1#
422048#
422462
422553A
Community Name
EAST ROCKHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST SIDE, CITY OF
EAST ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST STROUDSBURG, BOROUGH OF
EAST TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST VANDERGRIFT, BOROUGH OF
EAST VINCENT, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST WASHINGTON, BOROUGH OF
EAST WHEATFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
EAST WHITELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
EASTON, CITY OF
EASTTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
EASTVALE, BOROUGH OF
EATON, TOWNSHIP OF
EAU CLAIRE,BORO OF
EBENSBURG, BORO OF
ECONOMY, BOROUGH OF
EDDYSTONE, BOROUGH OF
EDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
EDGEWORTH, BOROUGH OF
EDGMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
EDINBORO, BOROUGH OF
EDWARDSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
EHRENFELD,BOROUGH OF
ELCO, BOROUGH OF
ELDER, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, BOROUGH OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELDRED, TOWNSHIP OF
ELGIN, BOROUGH OF
ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF
ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF
ELIZABETH, TOWNSHIP OF
ELIZABETHTOWN, BOROUGH OF
ELIZABETHVILLE, BOROUGH OF
ELK CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELKLAND, BOROUGH OF
ELKLAND, TOWN OF
ELKLICK, TOWNSHIP OF
ELLPORT, BOROUGH OF
ELLSWORTH, BOROUGH OF
County
BUCKS COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/19/89(R)
09/29/78(R)
04/02/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/29/79(R)
12/01/77(R)
10/30/78(R)
08/02/90(R)
06/01/89(R)
10/17/78(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/16/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/10/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/02/77(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/01/77(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
04/15/77(R)
03/19/90(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/19/89(R)
09/03/80(R)
01/17/85(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/17/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/17/78(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/19/89(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/28/90(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
11/17/78(R)
09/10/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/20/01 >
09/01/86(L)
09/28/90
09/29/78
04/02/90
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
11/20/96
(NSFHA)
08/02/90
11/20/96
04/06/01
11/20/96
04/15/81
05/01/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/15/81
09/30/93
12/16/80
10/04/95
09/30/93
06/15/81
04/15/77
03/19/90
10/18/95
06/19/89
06/04/90
01/17/85(M)
09/17/80
09/03/80
02/17/88
09/01/86(L)
05/15/85(M)
09/28/79(M)
10/04/95
10/04/95
03/16/81(M)
04/17/78
06/25/76(M)
06/19/89
07/03/85(M)
05/01/87(L)
06/30/76(M)
09/28/90
03/01/87(L)
09/10/84(M)
(NSFHA)
09/10/84(M)
Page 14 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420567#
421752#
422287#
422107A
420588#
420246#
420034#
422463A
42055 1#
421208#
420449#
421062#
421976#
4202 16#
420119#
420462#
420605#
421063#
420606#
42091 1#
420876#
4209 12#
420463#
422295B
421567#
420972#
422189#
422049A
421827#
421238#
422603A
420450#
420993#
42 1865 A
420923#
422148#
42051 1#
420188#
422198#
420110#
422424#
422366#
422097A
422120#
420673#
422570A
421285#
4222 19#
422629#
420464#
421753#
Community Name
ELLWOOD CITY, BOROUGH OF
ELMHURST, TOWN OF
ELVERSON, BOROUGH OF
EMLENTON, BOROUGH OF
EMMAUS, BOROUGH OF
EMPORIUM, BOROUGH OF
EMSWORTH, BOROUGH OF
ENON VALLEY, BOROUGH OF
EPHRATA, BOROUGH OF
EPHRATA, TOWNSHIP OF
ERIE, CITY OF
ETNA, BOROUGH OF
EULALIA, TOWNSHIP OF
EVANS CITY, BOROUGH OF
EVERETT, BOROUGH OF
EVERSON, BOROUGH OF
EXETER, BOROUGH OF
EXETER, TOWNSHIP OF
EXETER, TOWNSHIP OF
EXETER, TOWNSHIP OF
EXPORT, BOROUGH OF
FACTORYVILLE, BOROUGH OF
FAIRCHANCE, BOROUGH OF
FAIRFIELD, BOROUGH OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRHOPE, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRMOUNT, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWNSHIP OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWNSHIP OF
FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
FALLS CREEK, BOROUGH OF
FALLS, TOWNSHIP OF
FALLS, TOWNSHIP OF
FALLSTON, BOROUGH OF
FANNETT, TOWNSHIP OF
FARMINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FARMINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FARMINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FARRELL, CITY OF
FAWN GROVE, BOROUGH OF
FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF
FAWN, TOWNSHIP OF
FAYETE, TOWNSHIP OF
FAYETTE CITY, BOROUGH OF
FELL, TOWNSHIP OF
County
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/82(R)
02/02/90(R)
02/25/83(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/01/77(R)
02/01/78(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/03/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
05/19/81(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
05/04/89(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/16/77(R)
03/15/82(R)
09/15/83(R)
02/01/80(R)
12/15/81(R)
01/17/90(R)
04/16/91(R)
01/05/79(R)
08/02/90(R)
06/01/81(R)
04/17/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/01/81(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/79(R)
01/01/87(R)
02/15/78(R)
02/17/89(R)
09/06/89(R)
09/30/80(R)
07/03/90(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
10/29/82(R)
07/03/85(R)
12/01/86(R)
05/15/85(R)
04/17/78(R)
06/25/76(R)
01/18/84(R)
04/01/81(R)
12/03/87(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/82
02/02/90
11/20/96
06/30/76(M)
09/01/77
02/01/78
10/04/95
08/03/84(M)
04/01/81
05/19/81
03/01/79
07/05/00
12/05/95
05/04/89
11/16/90
03/14/80
05/16/77
05/21/01
09/15/83
08/01/80
08/05/97
01/17/90
04/16/91
01/05/79(M)
08/02/90
06/01/81
08/05/97
08/19/85(M)
04/01/81
03/18/80
09/01/86(L)
09/29/78
01/20/82(M)
01/01/87(L)
02/15/78
09/30/95
09/06/89
06/20/01 >
07/03/90
09/02/81
10/29/82
07/03/85(M)
12/01/86(L)
05/15/85(M)
04/17/78
06/25/76(M)
07/05/00
04/01/81
12/03/87
12/19/95
09/30/81
Page 15 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420922#
420260#
422380A
420517#
421429#
421286#
422135A
421550#
420133#
420326#
42041 5#
420094#
422067
420035#
422578
421930#
422062#
422199#
420811 A
420607#
421064#
421419#
421828#
421855#
422006A
421808#
420036#
421608#
422063#
421502#
420771 A
422007A
422494#
422315
420037#
422593#
420836#
421250#
421065#
421398#
421014#
422288#
420343#
42 1362 A
421625#
422595#
Community Name
FELTON, BOROUGH OF
FERGUSON, TOWNSHIP OF
FERGUSON, TOWNSHIP OF
FERMANAGH, TOWNSHIP OF
FERNDALE, BOROUGH OF
FINDLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
FINLEYVILLE, CITY OF
FISHING CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
FLEETWOOD, BOROUGH OF
FLEMINGTON, BOROUGH OF
FOLCROFT, BOROUGH OF
FORD CITY, BOROUGH OF
FOREST CITY, BOROUGH OF
FOREST HILLS, BOROUGH OF
FOREST LAKE, CITY OF
FORKS, TOWNSHIP OF
FORKS, TOWNSHIP OF
FORKSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
FORKSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
FORTY FORT, BOROUGH OF
FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF
FORWARD, TOWNSHIP OF
FOSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
FOSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
FOSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
FOUNTAIN HILL, BORO OF
FOX CHAPEL, BOROUGH OF
FOX, TOWNSHIP OF
FOX, TOWNSHIP OF
FOXBURG, BOROUGH OF
FRACKVILLE, CITY OF
FRAILEY, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANCONIA, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKFORT SPRINGS, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN PARK, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN, BOROUGH OF
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
YORK COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/01/81(R)
07/17/89(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/01/78(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
11/18/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/03/89(R)
02/02/89(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/01/77(R)
05/19/87(R)
02/05/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
07/16/80(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/01/87(R)
04/01/77(R)
02/01/80(R)
06/19/89(R)
04/01/81(R)
11/18/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/15/86(R)
04/15/77(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/15/82(R)
02/02/84(R)
01/01/82(R)
04/02/90(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/15/83(R)
03/16/89(R)
09/24/82(R)
08/01/77(R)
03/01/86(R)
08/01/79(R)
10/01/86(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
02/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/92
01/05/96
08/03/84(M)
02/01/78
1 1/05/86
10/04/95
09/01/86(L)
08/03/89
05/21/01
01/17/97
09/30/93
05/19/87
(NSFHA)
10/04/95
04/01/86(L)
04/06/01
1 1/02/90
08/01/87(L)
03/01/87(L)
07/03/81
10/04/95
06/19/89
04/01/81
11/18/81
09/01/86(L)
05/15/86
07/05/00
1 1/02/90
07/01/87(L)
09/30/87
05/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
12/19/96
(NSFHA)
10/04/95
04/02/90
09/29/78
08/15/83
03/16/89
09/24/82(M)
08/01/77
11/20/96
08/01/79
10/01/86(L)
03/18/91
02/17/89
Page 16 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422573#
421829#
420973#
422035#
422079#
422220#
422350A
421387#
421288#
422477
422030A
420111#
421251#
421388#
422121#
422637
42072 1#
420095#
422432A
421867#
422110#
422579
421774#
421005#
420762A
421537#
422262A
420974#
420797#
421727#
420229#
421977#
421626#
422316
421627#
422296#
421243#
421130#
422080A
421007#
422433B
421306#
422413A
422381A
421363A
420772#
422122#
Community Name
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRANKSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
FRAZER, TOWNSHIP OF
FREDONIA, BOROUGH OF
FREEBURG, BOROUGH OF
FREEDOM, BOROUGH OF
FREEDOM, TOWNSHIP OF
FREEDOM, TOWNSHIP OF
FREEHOLD, TOWNSHIP OF
FREELAND, BOROUGH OF
FREEMANSBURG, BOROUGH OF
FREEPORT, BOROUGH OF
FREEPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
FRENCH CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
FRENCH CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
FRIENDSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
FULTON, TOWNSHIP OF
GAINES, TOWNSHIP OF
GALETON, BOROUGH OF
GALLAGHER, TOWNSHIP OF
GALLITZIN, TOWNSHIP OF
GAMBLE, TOWNSHIP OF
GARRETT, BOROUGH OF
GASKILL, TOWNSHIP OF
GEISTOWN, BOROUGHS OF
GENESEE, TOWNSHIP OF
GEORGES, TOWNSHIP OF
GEORGETOWN, BOROUGHS OF
GERMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
GERMANY, TOWNSHIP OF
GETTYSBURG, BOROUGH OF
GIBSON, TOWNSHIP OF
GIBSON, TOWNSHIP OF
GILBERTON, BOROUGH OF
GILMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
GILPIN, TOWNSHIP OF
GIRARD, BOROUGH OF
GIRARD, TOWNSHIP OF
GIRARD, TOWNSHIP OF
GIRARD VILLE, BOROUGH OF
GLADE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/17/89(R)
05/19/81(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/02/82(R)
05/17/89(R)
01/19/83(R)
02/15/85(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/19/80(R)
11/17/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/01/80(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/05/85(R)
05/26/78(R)
09/01/77(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/01/86(R)
05/19/87(R)
02/05/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/78(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/04/90(R)
06/18/90(R)
03/19/90(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/16/91(R)
02/24/78(R)
04/16/91(R)
07/04/88(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/01/77(R)
12/01/86(R)
05/02/77(R)
08/24/84(R)
01/12/01(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/30/76(R)
02/02/90(R)
09/04/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/17/89
05/19/81
06/01/87(L)
08/02/82
05/17/89
01/19/83
02/15/85(M)
06/15/81
07/05/00
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
02/01/80
03/16/88
09/16/81
08/05/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/06/01
08/23/00
09/24/84(M)
06/01/86(L)
05/19/87
(NSFHA)
04/15/81
10/16/84
12/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
09/24/84(M)
09/30/80
06/04/90
06/18/90
03/19/90
06/01/87(L)
04/16/91
(NSFHA)
04/03/96
07/04/88
08/15/83
09/01/77
12/01/86(L)
05/02/77
08/24/84(M)
08/23/00
06/30/76(M)
06/17/86(M)
06/30/76(M)
04/15/92
09/04/87
Page 17 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420112#
42003 8#
422437A
420305
420924#
421754#
422254#
420039#
420416#
420925#
420773#
422382#
42 1522 A
420306#
421717A
42 1066 A
421134#
421591#
421669B
422068#
421212#
421902#
420040#
421644 A
421718#
420470
4223 17A
421538#
421364A
421649#
421670#
422478A
421965#
421389#
421365#
422456#
420477#
420877#
420674#
422512A
421067#
42 1523 A
421551#
422390A
Community Name
GLASGOW,BOROUGH OF
GLASSPORT, BOROUGH OF
GLEN CAMPBELL, BOROUGH OF
GLEN HOPE, BOROUGH OF
GLEN ROCK, BOROUGH OF
GLENBURN, TOWNSHIP OF
GLENDON, BOROUGH OF
GLENFIELD, BOROUGH OF
GLENOLDEN, BOROUGH OF
GOLDSBORO, BOROUGH OF
GORDON, BOROUGH OF
GOSHEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
GRAMPIAN, BOROUGH OF
GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF
GRANVILLE, CITY OF
GRANVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
GRATZ, BOROUGH OF
GRAY, TOWNSHIP OF
GREAT BEND, BOROUGH OF
GREAT BEND, TOWNSHIP OF
GREEN LANE, BOROUGH OF
GREEN TREE, BOROUGH OF
GREEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GREEN, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENCASTLE, BOROUGH OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENSBORO, BOROUGH OF
GREENSBURG, CITY OF
GREENVILLE, BOROUGH OF
GREENVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
County
BEAVER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/04/88(R)
06/15/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/01/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
01/16/80(R)
03/18/80(R)
11/18/81(R)
02/15/80(R)
11/15/78(R)
04/01/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
07/04/89(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/01/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
12/14/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/30/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/19/85(R)
12/05/89(R)
09/30/76(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
11/02/90(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/18/88(R)
04/01/82(R)
08/02/90(R)
07/16/90(R)
03/02/89(R)
10/17/78(R)
07/16/81(R)
09/10/84(R)
02/17/89(R)
08/01/86(R)
03/16/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/04/88
08/05/97
09/24/84(M)
04/01/86(L)
07/16/81
1 1/02/90
04/06/01
10/04/95
09/30/93
02/15/80
11/15/78
04/01/86(L)
04/01/86(L)
07/04/89
08/01/86(L)
05/01/86(L)
08/15/78
12/14/79(M)
09/24/84(M)
09/30/80
01/02/81
12/19/96
10/04/95
06/19/85(M)
12/05/89
(NSFHA)
09/10/84(M)
09/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
08/18/92
08/24/84(M)
06/30/76(M)
10/06/00
04/01/82
08/02/90
07/16/90
09/06/95
08/05/97
07/16/81
09/10/84(M)
05/21/01
08/01/86(L)
03/16/89
09/10/84(M)
Page 18 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421741#
421950#
421194#
420830#
420675#
421128#
421539A
421650#
421524#
42026 1#
421463#
420379#
421592#
420926#
422069#
420134#
420002#
421651#
421856#
421888#
421178A
421252#
421857#
420360#
420978#
4222 12#
421223A
422261 A
420608#
420722#
422555A
421144#
422081 A
421068#
4202 17#
421038#
421645#
422082#
420262#
420380#
42004 1#
421338#
42 1978 A
42235 IB
422102#
420609#
420230#
420697#
Community Name
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREENWOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
GREGG, TOWNSHIP OF
GREGG, TOWNSHIP OF
GROVE CITY, BOROUGH OF
GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
GRUGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
GUILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
GULICH, TOWNSHIP OF
HAINES TOWNSHIP OF
HALFMOON, TOWNSHIP OF
HALIFAX, BOROUGH OF
HALIFAX, TOWNSHIP OF
HALLAM, BOROUGH OF
HALLSTEAD, BOROUGH OF
HAMBURG BOROUGH OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMILTONBAN, TWP OF
HAMLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMPDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
HAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, BOROUGH OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
HARBORCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
HARFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMAR, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMONY, BOROUGH OF
HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRISBURG,CITY OF
HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRISON, TOWNSHIP OF
HARRISVILLE, BOROUGH OF
HARTLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
HARVEYS LAKE, BOROUGH OF
HASTINGS, BOROUGH OF
HATBORO, BOROUGH OF
County
JUNIATA COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/03/87(R)
05/19/81(R)
1 1/02/84(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/18/77(R)
12/01/86(R)
06/18/90(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/13/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
11/03/82(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
08/03/81(R)
06/18/90(R)
03/01/87(R)
02/04/88(R)
12/01/86(R)
07/04/88(R)
03/01/87(R)
02/15/78(R)
05/01/78(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/25/76(R)
05/16/77(R)
08/01/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/04/89(R)
01/03/79(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
06/05/89(R)
05/02/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/04/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/30/76(R)
03/04/88(R)
12/02/80(R)
08/03/89(R)
06/15/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/03/87
05/19/81
1 1/02/84(M)
09/28/79
09/30/77
07/18/77
12/01/86(L)
06/18/90
11/16/90
08/01/78
10/13/78(M)
09/05/79
11/03/82
02/15/80
09/30/80
05/21/01
08/03/81
06/18/90
03/01/87(L)
09/06/95
12/01/86(L)
07/04/88
03/01/87(L)
01/05/96
03/16/98
01/06/82
09/01/86(L)
06/25/76(M)
01/16/81
04/06/01
09/24/84(M)
09/17/80
09/01/86(L)
07/05/00
05/04/89
01/03/79
1 1/05/86
01/16/81
06/05/89
05/02/77
07/05/00
07/04/89
06/01/87(L)
06/30/76(M)
03/04/88
12/02/80(M)
08/03/89
12/19/96
Page 19 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42069M
420699#
420417#
420863#
42 1503 A
421127#
421227#
420042#
421830#
421203
421728#
42 1979 A
42 1980 A
422008A
420043#
421069#
420969#
421809#
42222 1#
420927#
420723#
420344#
421868#
420878#
420960#
42 1729 A
421628#
420640#
421379#
421862#
420735#
422580A
421646#
421792#
421253#
421508#
421609#
420381#
422064#
420189#
421831#
420162#
420500#
422501#
420044#
422318
420864#
422290#
4223 19A
Community Name
HATFIELD, BOROUGH OF
HATFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
HAVERFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
HAWLEY, BOROUGH OF
HAWTHORN, BOROUGH OF
HAYCOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
HAYFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
HAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
HAZLE, TOWNSHIP OF
HAZLETON, CITY OF
HEATH, CITY OF
HEBRON, TOWNSHIP OF
HECTOR, TOWNSHIP OF
HEGINS, TOWNSHIP OF
HEIDELBERG, BOROUGH OF
HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
HELLAM, TOWNSHIP OF
HELLERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
HEMLOCK TOWNSHIP OF
HEMPFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
HEMPFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
HENDERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
HENDERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
HENRY CLAY, TOWNSHIP OF
HEPBURN, TOWNSHIP OF
HEREFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
HERMITAGE, MUNICIPALITY OF
HERNDON, BOROUGH OF
HERRICK, TOWNSHIP OF
HICKORY, TOWN OF
HICKORY, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
HIGHSPIRE, BOROUGH OF
HILLSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
HILLTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
HOLLENBACK, TOWNSHIP OF
HOLLIDAYSBURG, BOROUGH OF
HOMER CITY, BOROUGH OF
HOMER, TOWNSHIP OF
HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF
HOMEWOOD, BOROUGH OF
HONESDALE, BOROUGH OF
HONEYBROOK, TOWNSHIP OF
HOOKSTOWN, CITY OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/15/78(R)
11/15/79(R)
07/05/77(R)
08/19/91(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/02/90(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
07/31/78(R)
04/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/03/90(R)
01/20/82(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/03/89(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
02/17/82(R)
05/03/90(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
08/01/79(R)
12/19/84(R)
11/19/86(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/04/88(R)
05/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
04/15/77(R)
11/02/90(R)
0 1/30/8 1(R)
09/17/80(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/25/78(R)
01/30/84(R)
1 1/30/73(R)
08/01/84(R)
05/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/02/98
03/02/98
09/30/93
03/15/94
05/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
08/02/90
10/04/95
04/01/81
(NSFHA)
04/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
10/04/95
05/21/01
10/20/82(M)
12/04/85(M)
09/30/81
09/22/99
04/06/01
08/01/79
02/15/91
08/05/97
10/18/95
04/01/86(L)
01/01/87(L)
02/17/82
12/05/97
09/30/81
08/01/79
1 1/05/86(M)
11/19/86
08/02/82
07/04/88
05/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
12/11/81
11/02/90
06/20/01 >
09/17/80
06/01/82
12/15/83
09/24/84(M)
10/04/95
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/20/96
05/01/86(L)
Page 20 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42079m
420812#
420120#
421321#
421339#
421581A
421690#
422556#
422222#
420700#
421610A
422594#
420307A
422299A
420263#
421464#
42 1647 A
421145#
422009A
422626
42064 1#
420190#
420382#
420880#
420994#
420486#
421143#
421832#
422332#
421195#
421525#
422179#
420350B
420121#
421323#
42 1202 A
422513A
420501#
421070#
420113#
420045#
420308#
Community Name
HOOVERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
HOP BOTTOM, BOROUGH OF
HOPEWELL, BOROUGH OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
HORSHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
HORTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HOUSTON, BOROUGH OF
HOUTZDALE, CITY OF
HOVEY, TOWNSHIP OF
HOWARD, BOROUGH OF
HOWARD, TOWNSHIP OF
HOWE, TOWNSHIP OF
HOWE, TOWNSHIP OF
HUBLEY, CITY OF
HUGHESTOWN, BOROUGH OF
HUGHESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
HULMEVILLE BOROUGH OF
HUMMELSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
HUNKER, BOROUGH OF
HUNLOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
HUNTINGDON, BOROUGH OF
HUNTINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HUNTINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HUSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HUSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HUSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
HYDE PARK, BOROUGH OF
HYDETOWN, BOROUGH OF
HYNDMAN, BOROUGH OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
INDIAN LAKE, BOROUGH OF
INDIANA, BOROUGH OF
INDIANA, TOWNSHIP OF
INDUSTRY, BOROUGH OF
INGRAM, BOROUGH OF
IRVONA, BOROUGH OF
County
SOMERSET COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/18/90(R)
05/17/89(R)
09/15/89(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/06/89(R)
06/01/89(R)
08/15/89(R)
08/06/82(R)
09/16/81(R)
11/16/77(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/18/79(R)
04/01/86(R)
11/01/86(R)
08/03/89(R)
08/03/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/15/79(R)
05/01/86(R)
07/31/78(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/30/77(R)
03/15/77(R)
11/19/86(R)
04/01/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/15/88(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/05/89(R)
01/03/90(R)
06/01/86(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/15/89(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
05/19/87(R)
10/18/83(R)
09/05/79(R)
03/30/79(R)
1 1/03/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/18/90
05/17/89
09/15/89
11/04/81
09/06/89
06/01/89
08/15/89
08/06/82(M)
09/16/81
12/19/96
12/01/86(L)
12/18/79
04/01/86(L)
11/01/86(L)
08/03/89
08/03/89
06/01/87(L)
08/15/79
05/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
10/15/81
06/20/01 >
03/15/77
08/05/97
04/01/80
05/16/95
07/15/88
04/15/81
09/30/80
06/05/89
01/03/90
08/05/97
04/17/85(M)
12/15/89
09/01/86(L)
02/01/87(L)
09/10/84(M)
05/19/87
07/05/00
09/05/79
10/04/95
1 1/03/89
Page 21 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420881#
422479#
421420#
421442 A
421552A
421593#
421671B
421691#
421805#
4206 10#
422601 A
422480#
421889#
421938#
421952#
422036#
422083A
420820#
422223#
422535#
420502B
420928A
42248 1#
421611#
420882#
422269
420046#
421071#
421594#
421629#
421672#
422457#
42 1869 A
422050A
422557A
421421B
42061 1#
422717#
422422A
42205 1#
422514A
420530#
420642B
42053 1#
422084#
420249#
Community Name
IRWIN, BOROUGH OF
JACKSON CENTER, BOROUGH OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSON,TOWNSHIP OF
JACKSONVILLE, BOROUGH OF
JACOBUS, BOROUGH OF
JAMESTOWN, BOROUGH OF
JAY, TOWNSHIP OF
JEANNETTE, CITY OF
JEDDO, BOROUGH OF
JEFFERSON, BOROUGH OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
JEFFERSON,TOWNSHIP OF
JENKINS, TOWNSHIP OF
JENKINTOWN, BOROUGH
JENKS, TOWNSHIP OF
JENNER, TOWNSHIP OF
JENNERSTOWN,BOROUGH OF
JERMYN, BOROUGH OF
JERSEY SHORE, BOROUGH OF
JESSUP, BOROUGH OF
JESSUP, TOWNSHIP OF
JIM THORPE, BOROUGH OF
County
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
PERRY COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/8 1(R)
06/18/82(R)
09/15/89(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/15/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/24/84(R)
08/03/89(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/17/80(R)
01/01/91(R)
12/19/80(R)
07/02/82(R)
08/15/79(R)
10/15/85(R)
01/20/82(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
08/19/91(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/10/82(R)
12/01/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/31/78(R)
04/01/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
10/15/82(R)
06/01/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
06/01/86(R)
06/01/86(R)
08/19/85(R)
06/30/76(R)
02/15/85(R)
05/16/77(R)
01/10/97(R)
02/15/85(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
03/05/76(R)
04/15/80(R)
05/17/89(R)
08/15/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/97
06/18/82(M)
09/15/89
06/30/76(M)
10/15/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
08/24/84(M)
08/03/89
09/30/81
09/17/80
01/01/91(L)
12/19/80(M)
07/02/82(M)
08/15/79
10/15/85(M)
01/20/82
05/01/86(L)
09/01/78
09/30/81
08/19/91
09/24/84(M)
07/16/76
09/10/82(M)
12/01/86(L)
08/05/97
(NSFHA)
08/05/97
05/21/01
10/15/82(M)
09/30/95
1 1/02/95
06/01/86(L)
06/01/86(L)
08/19/85(M)
06/30/76(M)
02/15/85(M)
05/16/77
12/19/96
02/15/85(M)
09/04/85(M)
09/24/84(M)
12/18/79
04/23/76
04/15/80
05/17/89
02/16/94
Page 22 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420443#
42023 1#
421612#
420572#
421939
422383A
422596A
42 1340 A
421390#
421692#
421140#
42021 8 A
421526#
420667#
421981#
422103#
420135#
421072#
420280#
422586#
421453#
421073#
421341A
421342#
422423A
4206 12#
420613#
421209#
420686#
420096#
421307A
422010A
421504
422367A
421527A
421730A
420819A
422320A
420736#
420136#
42245 8#
420913#
421742#
422482A
421966#
42 185 8 A
Community Name
JOHNSONBURG, BOROUGH OF
JOHNSTOWN, CITY OF
JONES, TOWNSHIP OF
JONESTOWN, BOROUGH OF
JORDAN, CITY OF
JORDAN, TOWNSHIP OF
JORDAN, TOWNSHIP OF
JUNIATA, TOWNSHIP OF
JUNIATA, TOWNSHIP OF
JUNIATA, TOWNSHIP OF
JUNIATA, TOWNSHIP OF
KARNS CITY,BORUGH OF
KARTHAUS, CITY OF
KEATING, TOWNSHIP OF
KEATING, TOWNSHIP OF
KELLY, TOWNSHIP OF
KENHORST, BOROUGH OF
KENNEDY, TOWNSHIP OF
KENNETT SQUARE, BOROUGH OF
KENNETT, TOWNSHIP OF
KIDDER, TOWNSHIP OF
KILBUCK, TOWNSHIP OF
KIMMEL, TOWNSHIP OF
KING, TOWNSHIP OF
KINGSLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
KINGSTON, BOROUGH OF
KINGSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
KISKIMINTAS, TOWNSHIP OF
KISTLER, BOROUGH OF
KITTANNING, BOROUGH OF
KITTANNING, TOWNSHIP OF
KLINE, TOWNSHIP OF
KNOX, BOROUGH OF
KNOX, TOWNSHIP OF
KNOX, TOWNSHIP OF
KNOX, TOWNSHIP OF OF
KNOXVILLE, BOROUGH OF
KOPPEL, BOROUGH OF
KULPMONT, BOROUGH OF
KUTZTOWN, BOROUGH OF
LA PLUME, TOWNSHIP OF
LACEYVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LACK, TOWNSHIP OF
LACKAWANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
LACKAWAXEN, TOWNSHIP OF
LAFAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
ELK COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
BERKS COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/78(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/16/77(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/17/89(R)
05/01/78(R)
02/15/85(R)
04/01/86(R)
06/01/78(R)
06/01/87(R)
03/01/77(R)
02/15/78(R)
02/15/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/01/84(R)
02/02/89(R)
02/01/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/15/90(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/01/77(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/05/88(R)
09/15/77(R)
07/03/86(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/30/83(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/01/78(R)
05/02/77(R)
09/03/82(R)
05/15/80(R)
12/03/87(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/04/88(R)
06/30/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/29/78
08/01/83
12/01/86(L)
12/04/79
04/01/86(L)
08/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
12/16/77(M)
09/16/81
02/17/89
05/01/78
02/15/85(M)
04/01/86(L)
01/25/80
06/01/87(L)
03/01/77
05/21/01
10/04/95
11/20/96
1 1/20/96
02/02/89
10/04/95
10/15/85(M)
08/15/90
06/01/87(L)
06/01/77
03/12/82
04/05/88
09/15/77
07/03/86
05/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
01/03/85(M)
06/30/76(M)
04/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
09/24/84(M)
05/01/78
05/21/01
09/03/82(M)
05/15/80
12/03/87
06/30/76(M)
10/06/00
06/30/76(M)
Page 23 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420995#
422414A
421833#
422483#
422166A
420327#
42 1422 A
420552#
420553#
420774#
420813#
422336#
421074#
42095 1#
42041 8#
420250#
422065A
4225 15#
4206 14#
422085#
421162#
420883#
421818#
422646#
421454#
42045 1#
421528#
421006#
420821#
42241 5#
422334#
420958#
420573#
422567#
420097B
420138#
421075#
420047#
421931#
422167#
42025 1#
421967#
420615#
42 1540 A
422200A
42036 1#
420139#
Community Name
LAFLIN, BOROUGH OF
LAKE CITY, BOROUGH OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAMAR, TOWNSHIP OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LANCASTER, TOWNSHIP OF
LANDINGVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LANESBORO, BOROUGH OF
LANGHORNE MANOR, BOROUGH OF
LANGHORNE, BOROUGH OF
LANSDALE, BOROUGH OF
LANSDOWNE, BOROUGH OF
LANSFORD, BOROUGH OF
LAPORTE, TOWNSHIP OF
LARIMER, TOWNSHIP OF
LARKSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LATHROP, TOWNSHIP OF
LATIMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
LATROBE, BOROUGH OF
LAUREL RUN, BOROUGH OF
LAURELDALE, BOROUGH OF
LAUSANNE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAWRENCE PARK, TOWNSHIP OF
LAWRENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAWRENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
LAWRENCEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LE BOEUF, TOWNSHIP OF
LE RAYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LEACOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
LEECHBURG, BOROUGH OF
LEESPORT, BOROUGH OF
LEET, TOWNSHIP OF
LEETSDALE, BOROUGH OF
LEHIGH, TOWNSHIP OF
LEHIGH, TOWNSHIP OF
LEHIGHTON, BOROUGH OF
LEHMAN, TOWNSHIP OF
LEHMAN, TOWNS SHIP OF
LEIDY, TOWNSHIP OF
LEMON, TOWNSHIP OF
LEMOYNE, BOROUGH OF
LENHARTSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
County
LUZERNE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/02/80(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/03/80(R)
06/18/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/16/88(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
08/15/77(R)
10/15/80(R)
02/15/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
05/01/78(R)
02/03/82(R)
05/21/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/01/88(R)
04/01/77(R)
04/03/89(R)
06/01/79(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/01/87(R)
11/30/78(R)
03/18/83(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/03/89(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/15/84(R)
02/20/8 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/20/77(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/14/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/15/81(R)
03/04/88(R)
09/15/77(R)
06/19/89(R)
12/02/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/02/80(M)
06/30/76(M)
09/03/80
06/18/82(M)
10/15/85(M)
03/16/88
05/01/86(L)
09/28/79
12/18/79
02/18/98
10/15/80
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
03/02/98
09/30/93
05/21/82(M)
07/01/87(L)
04/01/88(L)
04/01/77
04/03/89
02/17/82(M)
08/05/97
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
03/18/83(M)
09/29/78
08/03/89
09/03/80
08/15/80
05/15/84
02/20/8 1(M)
03/01/78
01/02/91
08/19/85(M)
05/20/77(M)
05/21/01
10/04/95
10/04/95
04/06/01
03/04/88
08/15/90
10/06/00
12/02/80
09/01/86(L)
07/01/87(L)
12/04/79
05/21/01
Page 24 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422086#
42 1076 A
422425#
420669A
420643#
421940
422104#
420929#
420831 A
420687#
420048#
420822A
421255#
421343#
421196#
420668#
42 1870 A
421921A
422087#
422098#
42 1662 A
422368A
422180#
420884#
421430#
421912#
422369A
422588A
422105#
422547A
420049#
421344#
422516A
42 1560 A
42 1400 A
420554#
422464A
421775#
421015#
420814#
421244B
420750#
421953#
420328#
421001#
421391#
421541A
421694#
Community Name
LENOX, TOWNSHIP OF
LEROY, CITY OF
LETTERKENNY, TOWNSHIP OF
LEWIS RUN, BOROUGH OF
LEWIS, TOWNSHIP OF
LEWIS, TOWNSHIP OF
LEWIS, TOWNSHIP OF
LEWISBERRY, BOROUGH OF
LEWISBURG, BOROUGH OF
LEWISTOWN, BOROUGH OF
LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF
LIBERTY, BOROUGH OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF
LICKING CREEK, CITY OF
LICKING, TOWNSHIP OF
LIGONIER, BOROUGH OF
LIGONIER, TOWNSHIP OF
LILLY, BOROUGH OF
LIMERICK, TOWNSHIP OF
LIMESTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
LIMESTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
LIMESTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
LIMESTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN, BOROUGH OF
LINCOLN, TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLN, TOWNSHIP OF
LINESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LITCHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
LITITZ, BOROUGH OF
LITTLE BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE BRITAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE MAHANOY, TOWNSHIP OF
LITTLE MEADOWS, BOROUGH OF
LITTLESTOWN, BOROUGH OF
LIVERPOOL, BOROUGH OF
LIVERPOOL, TOWNSHIP OF
LOCK HAVEN, CITY OF
LOCUST, TOWNSHIP OF
LOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
LOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
LOGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
UNION COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/03/89(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/17/82(R)
03/01/87(R)
03/02/83(R)
04/01/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
11/17/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/15/78(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/04/88(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/05/89(R)
09/01/77(R)
06/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
05/17/89(R)
07/01/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
01/03/85(R)
10/15/80(R)
09/01/78(R)
10/17/89(R)
03/16/81(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
03/04/88(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
10/01/86(R)
10/15/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/05/79(R)
07/04/89(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/28/84(R)
05/01/86(R)
08/03/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/89
05/01/86(L)
09/17/82(M)
03/01/87(L)
03/02/83
04/01/86(L)
09/30/87
11/17/82
02/02/77
09/15/89
08/05/97
03/01/87(L)
07/04/88
09/30/88
06/05/89
09/01/77
06/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
05/17/89
07/01/87(L)
05/01/86(L)
01/03/85(M)
08/05/97
08/05/97
10/17/89
12/19/96
01/03/85(M)
06/01/87(L)
03/04/88
06/01/87(L)
08/05/97
09/30/88
09/10/84(M)
06/05/85(M)
10/01/86(L)
10/15/80
05/01/86(L)
04/15/81
09/05/79
07/04/89
06/01/84
08/15/79
06/18/80
09/17/97
08/01/79
10/17/86
05/01/86(L)
08/03/89
Page 25 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42 1533 A
422213
422273#
422274#
421345#
421484#
420383#
422136A
421380#
420232#
421431
421016#
420140#
421017#
420885#
420930#
421604#
421018#
420952#
420953#
421077#
420589A
421941#
420191#
42070 1#
421582#
421039#
420702#
420724#
422253#
421485#
420384#
421908#
420703#
421170#
420982#
420192#
420385#
421455#
422517#
421630#
Community Name
LOGANTON, CITY OF
LOGANVILLE, BOROUGH OF
LONDON BRITAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
LONDON GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
LONDONDERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
LONDONDERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
LONDONDERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
LONG BRANCH, CITY OF
LONGSWAMP, TOWNSHIP OF
LORAIN, BOROUGH OF
LORETTO, BOROUGH OF
LOWER ALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER ALSACE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER AUGUSTA, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER BURRELL, CITY OF
LOWER CHANCEFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER CHICHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER FRANKFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER FREDERICK, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER GWYNEDD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MACUNGIE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MAHANOY, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MAKEFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MERION, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MIFFLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MORELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER MOUNT BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER NAZERETH, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER OXFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER PAXTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER POTTSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER SALFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER SAUCON, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER SWATARA, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER TOWAMENSING, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER TURKEYFOOT, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER TYRONE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
CLINTON COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/86(R)
08/12/85(R)
12/31/82(R)
02/11/83(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/03/90(R)
08/15/90(R)
07/21/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/05/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/17/82(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/22/78(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/30/77(R)
10/14/77(R)
08/16/82(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/30/77(R)
02/01/78(R)
10/08/82(R)
04/17/78(R)
03/01/78(R)
03/01/77(R)
05/04/88(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/02/79(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/15/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
11/15/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
03/04/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
1 1/20/96
1 1/20/96
07/17/89
1 1/20/96
03/18/80
09/01/86(L)
05/21/01
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
09/30/77
05/21/01
08/01/79
1 1/20/00
02/15/80
09/30/93
03/16/88
12/19/96
12/19/96
05/21/01
02/02/77
08/02/82
06/20/01 >
08/09/99
10/08/82(M)
11/02/79
12/19/96
04/06/01
04/06/01
1 1/20/96
04/15/81
12/19/96
12/19/96
12/19/96
04/06/01
06/20/01 >
06/11/82
11/15/89
09/10/84(M)
03/04/88
Page 26 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421187#
420233#
421811A
422190#
421040#
420309
421129#
421652#
4206 16#
421631#
420644#
420386#
42 1595 A
421812#
420590#
422370#
421553#
421755A
421308A
4203 10#
420775
422011 A
421041#
421793#
421234#
422633#
421078#
421554A
42028 1#
422168#
42093 1#
420555#
420556#
422224#
421346#
421325#
420886#
421309#
420557#
420098#
420823
420487#
420419#
Community Name
LOWER WINDSOR, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWER YODER, TOWNSHIP OF
LOWHILL,TOWNSHIP OF
LOYALHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
LOYALSOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
LUMBER CITY, BOROUGH
LUMBER, TOWNSHIP OF
LURGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
LUZERNE, BOROUGH OF
LUZERNE, TOWNSHIP OF
LYCOMING, TOWNSHIP OF
LYKENS, BOROUGH OF
LYKENS, TOWNSHIP OF
LYNN, TOWNSHIP OF
MACUNGIE, BOROUGH OF
MADISON, TOWNSHIP OF
MADISON, TOWNSHIP OF
MADISON, TOWNSHIP OF
MADISON,TOWNSHIP OF
MAHAFFEY, BOROUGH OF
MAHANOY CITY, BOROUGH OF
MAHANOY, TOWNSHIP OF
MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
MAHONING, TYOWNSHIP OF
MAIDENCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
MALVERN, BOROUGH OF
MANCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
MANCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
MANHEIM, BOROUGH OF
MANHEIM, TOWNSHIP OF
MANHEIM, TOWNSHIP OF
MANN, TOWNSHIP OF
MANNS CHOICE, BOROUGH OF
MANOR, BOROUGH OF
MANOR, TONWSHIP OF
MANOR, TOWNSHIP OF
INCLUDES THE BOROUGH OF WASHINGTON
MANORVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MANSFIELD, BOROUGH OF
MAPLETON, BOROUGH OF
MARCUS HOOK, BOROUGH OF
County
YORK COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/02/83(R)
02/01/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
01/20/82(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/09/97(R)
01/05/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/15/77(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/17/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/30/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/03/89(R)
06/01/86(R)
05/01/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
02/18/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
06/01/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/02/83(R)
08/15/79(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/06/89(R)
09/01/77(R)
05/19/87(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/24/81(R)
07/05/77(R)
09/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/22/99
02/01/78
10/15/85(M)
08/05/97
04/17/84
(NSFHA)
01/05/78
09/01/78(M)
04/15/77
09/20/95
09/01/83
09/03/80
10/15/85(M)
09/30/87
04/15/80
09/30/87
08/03/89
06/01/86(L)
05/01/85(M)
07/04/89
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
09/29/78
02/18/83(M)
04/15/77
06/01/86(L)
05/21/01
10/15/85(M)
11/20/96
09/30/88
12/01/81
03/02/83
01/01/82
04/04/83
09/01/78(M)
09/06/89
08/05/97
05/19/87
09/22/99
07/02/87
(NSFHA)
07/05/77
09/30/93
Page 27 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420854#
420558#
420503#
422249#
421079#
4202 19#
421465#
422606A
421913#
420420#
420220#
421080#
421146#
421384#
42075 1#
422572#
42075 8#
421381#
421923#
420532#
420806A
420776#
421731#
421081#
42270 1#
420855#
421935A
420975#
420645#
422416#
422623#
420052#
42005 1#
422597A
421245#
420688A
422123#
42035 1#
420362#
421994A
42042 W
42220 1#
421256#
421632#
420676#
422352#
42047 1#
4209 14#
421009#
Community Name
MARIANNA, BOROUGH OF
MARIETTA, BOROUGH OF
MARION CENTER, BOROUGH OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARION, TOWNSHIP OF
MARKLEYSBURG, BOROUGH OF
MARLBOROUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
MARPLE, TOWNSHIP OF
MARS, BOROUGH OF
MARSHALL, TOWNSHIP OF
MARTIC, TOWNSHIP OF
MARTINSBURG, BOROUGH OF
MARYSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MASONTOWN, BOROUGH OF
MATAMORAS, BOROUGH OF
MAXATAWNY, TOWNSHIP OF
MAYBERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
MAYFIELD, BOROUGH OF
MC CLURE, BOROUGH OF
MCADOO, BOROUGH OF
MCCALMONT, CITY OF
MCCANDLESS, TOWNSHIP OF
MCCONNELLSBURGH, BOROUGH OF
MCDONALD, BOROUGH OF
MCEWENSVILLE, CITY OF
MCHENRY, TOWNSHIP OF
MCINTYRE, TOWNSHIP OF
MCKEAN, BOROUGH OF
MCKEAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MCKEES ROCKS, BOROUGH OF
MCKEESPORT, CITY OF
MCNETT, TOWNSHIP OF
MCSHERRYSTOWN, BOROUGHS OF
MCVEYTOWN, BOROUGH OF
MEAD, TOWNSHIP OF
MEADVILLE, CITY OF
MECHANICSBURG, BOROUGH OF
MECHANICSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MEDIA, BOROUGH OF
MEHOOPANY, TOWNSHIP OF
MENALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
MENALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
MERCER, BOROUGH OF
MERCER, TOWNSHIP OF
MERCERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
MESHOPPEN, BOROUGH OF
MESHOPPEN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
LYCOMING COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/19/89(R)
02/01/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/02/89(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
06/08/84(R)
11/02/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/01/77(R)
05/04/89(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
01/16/80(R)
04/20/79(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
01/05/89(R)
11/05/80(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
10/15/85(R)
04/17/78(R)
04/01/86(R)
06/18/80(R)
04/07/95
08/15/83(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/15/80(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/16/77(R)
01/03/79(R)
12/23/83(R)
03/04/88(R)
06/01/87(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
06/01/77(R)
01/16/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/03/90(R)
07/04/88(R)
04/16/91(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/08/84(R)
03/01/86(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/15/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/19/89
02/01/80
11/16/95
03/02/89
05/21/01
06/08/84(M)
11/02/84(M)
06/19/85
04/21/99
09/30/93
05/04/89
03/16/98
01/16/80
01/20/82(M)
05/16/77
02/02/95
10/06/00
05/21/01
09/30/87
09/30/81
10/15/85(M)
04/17/78
04/01/86(L)
03/16/98
02/09/01
10/04/95
09/01/86(L)
08/15/80
11/04/81
09/30/77
07/16/80
10/04/95
08/05/97
12/23/83(M)
06/08/98
06/01/87(L)
1 1/04/88
06/01/77
03/03/92
05/01/86(L)
09/30/93
07/03/90
07/04/88
04/16/91
03/15/77
06/08/84(M)
07/15/92
09/16/81
02/15/80
Page 28 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421653#
422044#
420387#
421890#
421443A
420807#
421179 A
422037#
4225 18#
420777A
421229#
420363#
420388#
422088#
420193#
420422#
42232 1#
422558#
4205 18#
421167#
42 1596 A
422590A
420832#
420519#
421197#
420264B
420759#
422337#
421743#
422642#
422519A
420488#
421845#
421871#
420330C
422417#
422408#
422371 A
420452#
420574B
421695#
421954#
420389#
420752#
420559B
420265#
421613#
420053#
421545#
Community Name
METAL, TOWNSHIP OF
MEYERSDALE, BOROUGH OF
MIDDLE PAXTON, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLE SMITHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLE TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLEBURG, BOROUGH OF
MIDDLEBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLECREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLECREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLEPORT, CITY OF
MIDDLESEX, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLESEX, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLETOWN, BOROUGH OF
MIDDLETOWN, CITY OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDDLETOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIDLAND, BOROUGHS OF
MIDWAY, BOROUGH OF
MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF
MIFFLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIFFLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIFFLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
MIFFLINBURG, BOROUGHS OF
MIFFLINTOWN, BOROUGH OF
MILES, TOWNSHIP OF
MILESBURG, BOROUGH OF
MILFORD, BOROUGH OF
MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
MILL CREEK, BOROUGH OF
MILL CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MILL CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MILL HALL, BOROUGH OF
MILL VILLAGE, BOROUGH OF
MILLBOURNE, BOROUGH OF
MILLCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLER, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLER, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
MILLERSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
MILLERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MILLHEIM, BOROUGH OF
MILLSTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
MILLVALE, BOROUGH OF
MILLVILLE, BOROUGH OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
12/16/88(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/01/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/28/76(R)
04/01/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/15/79(R)
10/18/88(R)
08/15/89(R)
02/01/78(R)
08/15/79(R)
06/25/76(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/04/88(R)
11/15/79(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/02/77(R)
06/01/89(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
03/02/89(R)
03/02/79(R)
12/17/82(R)
02/16/77(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/22/78(R)
01/03/85(R)
04/16/79(R)
11/18/83(R)
03/02/89(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
12/15/78(R)
06/05/89(R)
12/01/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/19/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/86(L)
06/17/86
08/15/79
12/16/88
10/15/85(M)
10/16/84
07/01/87(L)
01/06/82
09/10/84(M)
09/01/86(L)
12/01/83
06/15/81
08/15/83
04/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
09/30/93
10/18/88
08/15/89
02/01/78
08/15/79
06/25/76(M)
04/17/85(M)
03/04/88
11/15/79
12/04/85(M)
02/02/77
10/06/00
06/20/01 >
09/02/81
10/06/00
09/10/84(M)
03/02/89
03/02/79(M)
12/17/82(M)
09/05/84
05/19/81
09/30/93
01/03/85(M)
04/16/79
11/18/83(M)
04/16/90
04/15/81
08/15/80
05/19/81
12/15/78(M)
06/05/89
12/01/86(L)
03/16/98
06/19/89
Page 29 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
425384#
422536#
420778#
420282#
420142#
420114#
422225#
420887#
420856#
421673#
420170#
421347A
421083A
422372A
420364#
421744#
421020#
421186#
420054#
420472#
420646#
422426#
421719A
421226#
421002#
420648#
422070A
421082#
420983#
420533#
421846#
42 1674 A
421529#
421675A
421696#
421155#
422559A
420194#
420423#
420534#
421995A
42073 8#
Community Name
MILTON, BOROUGH OF
MINERAL, TOWNSHIP OF
MINERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MODENA, BOROUGH OF
MOHNTON, BOROUGH OF
MONACA, BOROUGH OF
MONAGHAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MONESSEN, CITY OF
MONOGAHELA, CITY OF
MONONGAHELA, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, BOROUGH OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF
MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MONT ALTO, BOROUGH OF
MONTGOMERY, BOROUGH OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTOUR, TOWNSHIP OF
MONTOURSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MONTROSE, BOROUGH OF
MOON, TOWNSHIP OF
MOORE, TOWNSHIP OF
MOOSIC, BOROUGH OF
MORELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
MORGAN, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF
MORRISVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MORTON, BOROUGH OF
MOSCOW, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT CARBON, CITY OF
MOUNT CARMEL, BOROUGH OF
County
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
VENANGO COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/10/72(R)
01/01/87(R)
03/02/89(R)
11/19/87(R)
07/02/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/03/86(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/01/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
1 1/04/87(R)
02/02/77(R)
07/03/90(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/16/90(R)
06/15/78(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
05/15/84(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/15/77(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/15/79(R)
10/17/78(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
07/01/86(R)
12/05/89(R)
08/24/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/16/80(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/02/80
01/01/87(L)
03/02/89
1 1/20/96
05/21/01
12/04/79
08/15/80
08/05/97
09/20/95
10/18/95
09/17/92
10/15/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
05/01/86(L)
06/02/92
1 1/04/87
04/25/80
07/03/90
08/05/97
07/16/90
06/15/78
1 1/04/92
08/01/86(L)
03/02/98
08/01/79
08/15/77
06/25/76(M)
10/04/95
04/06/01
11/01/79
03/02/81
07/01/86(L)
12/05/89
08/24/84(M)
12/04/85(M)
09/03/80
08/05/85(M)
06/20/01 >
09/30/93
12/01/81
09/01/86(L)
06/19/85
Page 30 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421942#
421851
420365#
420670
420561#
421257#
421776#
420055#
421042#
422149#
420692#
420489#
421021#
420560#
421272#
420143#
422181#
421258#
422169A
420888#
422353A
420144#
420650#
420649#
421847#
420056#
422263A
421207#
420575#
4206 17#
4226 10#
421348#
421903#
420725#
421181A
4206 18#
4206 19#
421794#
420252#
420424#
425385#
420172A
420799#
422465#
420833#
420296#
420115#
420986#
Community Name
MOUNT CARMEL, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT GRETNA, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT HOLLY SPRINGS, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT JEWETT, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT JOY, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT JOY, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT JOY, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT OLIVER, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
MOUNT POCONO, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT UNION, BOROUGH OF
MOUNT WOLF, BOROUGH OF
MOUNTVILLE, BOROUGH OF
MT. LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
MT. PENN, BOROUGH OF
MT. PLEASANT, BOROUGH OF
MT. PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
MT. PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
MT. PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
MUDDY CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MUHLENBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
MUNCY CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
MUNCY, BOROUGH OF
MUNCY, TOWNSHIP OF
MUNHALL, BOROUGH OF
MUNSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
MURRYSVILLE, CITY OF
MYERSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
NANTICOKE, CITY OF
NANTY GLO, BOROUGH OF
NAPIER, TOWNSHIP OF
NARBERTH, BOROUGH OF
NAZARETH, BOROUGH OF
NELSON, TOWNSHIP OF
NESCOPECK, BOROUGH OF
NESCOPECK, TOWNSHIP OF
NESHANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
NESQUEHONING, BOROUGH OF
NETHER PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
NEVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW ALBANY, BOROUGH OF
NEW BALTIMORE, BOROUGH OF
NEW BEAVER, BOROUGH OF
NEW BERLIN, BOROUGH OF
NEW BETHLEHEM, BOROUGH OF
NEW BRIGHTON, BOROUGH OF
NEW BRITAIN, BOROUGH OF
County
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
LEBANON COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/03/90(R)
1 1/30/78(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/30/76(R)
10/15/81(R)
07/04/88(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/26/78(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
10/08/82(R)
05/28/82(R)
07/18/77(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
06/30/76(R)
07/31/78(R)
02/01/87(R)
12/01/81(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/18/77(R)
04/17/85(R)
09/01/77(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/16/77(R)
08/19/87(R)
04/24/8 1(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/17/82(R)
07/05/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/15/89(R)
09/06/89(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/08/82(R)
12/01/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/03/90(R)
12/01/78(R)
07/07/72(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/30/86(R)
08/15/90(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/02/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/03/90
(NSFHA)
01/05/96
(NSFHA)
10/15/81(M)
07/04/88
09/16/81
10/04/95
04/16/90
10/08/82(M)
05/28/82(M)
07/18/77
05/15/80
07/16/81
10/04/95
(NSFHA)
08/05/97
12/01/81
12/04/85(M)
08/05/97
04/17/85(M)
05/21/01
09/30/80
02/03/93
08/19/87
10/04/95
12/04/85(M)
08/05/97
09/10/82
04/15/77
09/15/89
09/06/89
12/19/96
04/06/01
12/01/86(L)
02/01/80
08/01/80
04/03/87
07/03/90
09/30/93
10/04/95
09/01/86(L)
09/24/84(M)
02/01/87(L)
04/30/86
08/15/90
08/15/83
06/20/01 >
Page 31 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420987#
420753#
420568#
4220 12#
422653
421819#
420366B
420857#
420890#
420932#
422322#
422275#
421914#
420195#
420891#
422484#
422276#
420815#
422089#
422755#
421326
420779#
421996#
422323#
420892#
422485#
4203 12B
420569B
422226#
422405A
420311 A
420465#
421486#
420754#
421822#
422333#
420689#
421756#
420196#
421084#
42099 1#
421579#
Community Name
NEW BRITAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW BUFFALO, BOROUGH OF
NEW CASTLE, CITY OF
NEW CASTLE, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW CENTERVILLE, BOROUGH OF
NEW COLUMBUS, BOROUGH OF
NEW CUMBERLAND, BOROUGH OF
NEW EAGLE, BOROUGH OF
NEW FLORENCE, BOROUGH OF
NEW FREEDOM, BOROUGH OF
NEW GALILEE,BOROUGH OF
NEW GARDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW HOPE, BOROUGH OF
NEW KENSINGTON, CITY OF
NEW LEBANON, BOROUGH OF
NEW LONDON, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW MILFORD, BOROUGH OF
NEW MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW MORGAN, BOROUGH OF
NEW PARIS, BOROUGH OF
NEW PHILADELPHIA, BOROUGH OF
NEW RINGGOLD, BOROUGH OF
NEW SEWICKLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW STANTON, BOROUGH OF
NEW VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF
NEW WASHINGTON, BOROUGH OF
NEW WILMINGTON, BOROUGH OF
NEWBERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWBURG, BOROUGH OF
NEWBURG, CITY OF
NEWELL, BOROUGH OF
NEWLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWPORT, BOROUGH OF
NEWPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWRY, BOROUGH OF
NEWTON HAMILTON, BOROUGH OF
NEWTON, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWTOWN, BOROUGH OF
NEWTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
NEWVILLE, BOROUGH OF
County
BUCKS COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
04/02/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/13/82(R)
02/20/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
02/16/77(R)
03/18/80(R)
06/03/88(R)
03/02/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/15/82(R)
09/16/81(R)
12/15/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/10/82(R)
11/12/82(R)
07/04/89(R)
04/03/89(R)
04/20/98(R)
07/21/78(R)
08/15/77(R)
11/15/89(R)
03/02/89(R)
12/15/81(R)
10/15/82(R)
08/03/84(R)
08/03/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/24/77(R)
04/01/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/01/84(R)
08/15/79(R)
12/02/80(R)
01/18/84(R)
02/15/78(R)
07/03/90(R)
12/18/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/14/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/20/01 >
04/02/79
08/15/78
08/13/82(M)
(NSFHA)
03/16/81
02/16/77
02/02/96
08/05/97
01/20/82(M)
09/24/84(M)
11/20/96
12/19/96
06/20/01 >
1 1/20/00
09/10/82(M)
1 1/20/96
07/04/89
04/03/89
05/21/01
(NSFHA)
08/15/77
11/15/89
03/02/89
08/05/97
10/15/82(M)
08/03/84(M)
08/03/84(M)
07/02/80
06/24/77(M)
04/01/86(L)
11/16/95
11/20/96
08/15/79
12/02/80(M)
01/18/84
02/15/78
07/03/90
06/20/01 >
06/20/01 >
09/30/93
12/14/79(M)
Page 32 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420915A
422420#
422202A
42065 1#
420197#
425386#
422460#
420970#
422300B
421795#
422182#
422560#
422203A
421310A
420727#
421555A
422137#
422227#
420576#
420283#
421359#
421368#
421085#
422150#
421086#
422228#
420893#
42264 1#
421131#
420577#
42243 8 A
422013#
420367#
422204A
42 1583 A
421161#
423636#
422151#
421087#
421633#
4220 14A
421231#
Community Name
NICHOLSON, BOROUGH OF
NICHOLSON, TOWNSHIP OF
NICHOLSON, TOWNSHIP OF
NIPPENOSE, TOWNSHIP OF
NOCKAMIXON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORRISTOWN, BOROUGH OF
NORTH ABINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH ANNVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH APOLLO, BOROUGH OF
NORTH BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH BELLE VERNON, BOROUGH OF
NORTH BETHLEHEM, TOWN OF
NORTH BRANCH, TOWNSHIPOF
NORTH BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH CATASAUQUA, BOROUGH OF
NORTH CENTRE, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH CHARLEROI, BOROUGH OF
NORTH CODORUS, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH CORNWALL, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH COVENTRY, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH EAST, BOROUGH OF
NORTH EAST, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH HOPEWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH HUNTINGDON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH IRWIN, BOROUGH OF
NORTH LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH LONDONDERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH MANHEIM, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH MIDDLETON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH MORELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH NEWTON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH SEWICKLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH SHENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH STRABANE, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH TO WAND A, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WYOMING COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/01/87(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
11/02/77(R)
12/22/72(R)
08/10/79(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/01/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/30/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
11/01/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
10/15/81(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/15/78(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/18/83(R)
07/04/89(R)
03/18/83(R)
04/01/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
11/17/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
11/15/89(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
10/01/86(R)
02/15/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
04/16/91(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/01/87(L)
09/06/95
07/01/87(L)
04/15/80
06/20/01 >
08/09/99
01/16/81(M)
09/28/79
05/01/85(M)
08/19/87
08/05/97
10/15/85
08/01/87(L)
11/01/86(L)
04/06/01
10/15/85(M)
12/19/95
10/15/81
07/09/82
11/20/96
02/04/81
05/19/81
10/04/95
07/04/89
05/21/01
04/01/81
08/05/97
(NSFHA)
09/02/81
09/28/79
09/24/84(M)
11/06/96
04/01/82
07/01/87(L)
09/10/84(M)
06/01/82
10/01/86(L)
02/15/80
04/16/91
09/01/86(L)
08/05/97
Page 33 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420704#
421813#
421392#
420933#
420726#
422520#
420988#
421955A
420739B
422015#
421859A
420425#
422561A
422205#
42033 1#
422272#
421088#
420059#
42207 1#
422581#
422111#
422354A
420060#
422052#
421089#
421615A
422324#
420837#
421568#
422537#
420535#
420652#
420965#
421732#
421882#
421022#
420536#
421697#
420966#
421003#
420345#
421682#
422170#
421401A
421204#
Community Name
NORTH WALES, BOROUGH OF
NORTH WHITEHALL, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH WOODBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTH YORK, BOROUGH OF
NORTHAMPTON, BOROUGH OF
NORTHAMPTON, TOQWNSHIP OF
NORTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTHEAST MADISON, TOWNSHIP OF
NORTHUMBERLAND, BOROUGH OF
NORWEGIAN, TOWNSHIP OF
NORWICH, TOWNSHIP OF
NORWOOD, BOROUGH OF
NOTTINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
NOXEN, TOWNSHIP OF
NOYES, TOWNSHIP OF
NU ANGOLA, BOROUGH OF
O'HARA, TOWNSHIP OF
OAKDALE, BOROUGH OF
OAKLAND, BOROUGH OF
OAKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
OAKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
OAKLAND,TOWNSHIP OF
OAKMONT, BOROUGH OF
OGLE, TOWNSHIP OF
OHIO, TOWNSHIP OF
OHIOPYLE, BOROUGHS OF
OHIOVILLE, BOROUGH OF
OIL CITY, CITY OF
OIL CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
OIL CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
OLD FORGE, BOROUGH OF
OLD LYCOMING, TOWNSHIP OF
OLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
OLIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
OLIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
OLIVER, TOWNSHIP OF
OLYPHANT, BOROUGH OF
ONEIDA, TOWNSHIP OF
ONTELAUNEE, TOWNSHIP OF
ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF
ORANGEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
ORBISONIA, BOROUGH OF
OREGON, TOWNSHIP OF
ORWELL, TOWNSHIP OF
ORWIGSBURG, BOROUGH OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/16/81(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/04/85(R)
02/02/77(R)
07/09/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/10/84(R)
04/01/87(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/15/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
10/15/80(R)
02/01/87(R)
04/17/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/17/90(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/05/77(R)
08/15/90(R)
10/01/86(R)
10/16/79(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/14/90(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/17/80(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/02/89(R)
06/01/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
12/31/82(R)
1 1/05/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/02/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/19/96
09/30/81
09/16/81
07/02/82
04/06/01
04/03/87
06/20/01 >
09/04/85(M)
02/02/77
07/09/82(M)
07/01/87(L)
09/30/93
09/10/84(M)
04/01/87(L)
1 1/05/80
01/20/82(M)
07/05/00
10/04/95
01/02/81
10/15/80
02/01/87(L)
04/17/85(M)
07/05/00
05/17/90
10/04/95
12/01/86(L)
09/24/84(M)
07/05/77
08/15/90
10/01/86(L)
10/16/79
04/15/77
05/21/01
08/24/84(M)
09/17/80
08/15/79
09/28/79
12/19/95
05/21/01
12/19/95
08/01/79
07/03/95
1 1/05/82(M)
09/01/86(L)
03/02/89
Page 34 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42006 1#
420313#
421182#
420763A
42 1982 A
422486A
42 1860 A
422568A
42 1402 A
420284#
420003#
421456A
420800#
422373A
422521#
420728#
420253#
420578
421968#
420865#
420780B
421777#
421891#
420934#
420099#
421219A
422277#
421311#
420426#
420254#
422325#
422326
420235#
420266B
421023#
421352#
420390#
422229#
421926#
420391
421457#
421092#
422645#
420895#
421091#
421241#
421466#
421487#
421530#
Community Name
OSBORNE, BOROUGH OF
OSCEOLA MILLS, BOROUGH OF
OSCEOLA, TOWNSHIP OF
OSWAYO, BOROUGH OF
OSWAYO, TOWNSHIP OF
OTTER CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
OTTO, TOWNSHIP OF
OVERFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
OVERTON, CITY OF
OXFORD, BOROUGH OF
OXFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
PACKER, TOWNSHIP OF
PAINT, BOROUGHS OF
PAINT, TOWNSHIP OF
PAINT, TOWNSHIP OF
PALMER, TOWNSHIP OF
PALMERTON, BOROUGH OF
PALMYRA, BOROUGH OF
PALMYRA, TOWNSHIP OF
PALMYRA, TOWNSHIP OF
PALO ALTO, BOROUGH OF
PARADISE, TOWNSHIP OF
PARADISE, TOWNSHIP OF
PARADISE, TOWNSHIP OF
PARKER CITY, CITY OF
PARKER, TOWNSHIP OF
PARKESBURG, BOROUGH OF
PARKS, TOWNSHIP OF
PARKSIDE, BOROUGH OF
PARRYVILLE, BOROUGH OF
PATTERSON HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
PATTERSON, TOWNSHIP OF
PATTON, BOROUGH OF
PATTON, TOWNSHIP OF
PAUPACK, TOWNSHIP OF
PAVIA, TOWNSHIP OF
PAXTANG, BOROUGH OF
PEACH BOTTOM, TOWNSHIP OF
PEN ARGYL, BOROUGH OF
PENBROOK, BOROUGH OF
PENN FOREST, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN HILLS, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN LAKE PARK, BOROUGH OF
PENN, BOROUGH OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/15/79(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/19/91(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/01/87(R)
12/01/86(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/17/82(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/19/86(R)
01/03/85(R)
06/04/90(R)
12/28/76(R)
09/15/78(R)
05/26/78(R)
11/19/82(R)
03/15/77(R)
08/03/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/02/88(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/01/83(R)
04/05/88(R)
07/05/77(R)
03/01/78(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/01/87(R)
01/17/90(R)
02/19/86(R)
03/01/77(R)
06/01/89(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/31/78(R)
02/02/89(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/05/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
07/15/88(R)
08/15/89(R)
10/17/89(R)
12/17/82(R)
07/17/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/04/95
11/16/90
08/19/91
06/01/87(L)
08/10/87(L)
12/01/86(L)
06/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
05/01/86(L)
11/20/96
12/01/81
09/01/86(L)
11/19/86
01/03/85(M)
06/04/90
04/06/01
09/15/78
(NSFHA)
10/06/00
11/17/93
08/03/84(M)
05/19/81
09/02/88
09/02/81
09/30/87
09/01/86(L)
1 1/20/96
04/05/88
09/30/93
03/01/78
10/30/81
12/01/87(L)
02/22/99
02/19/86(M)
03/01/77
06/01/89(L)
03/18/80
09/30/81
04/06/01
(NSFHA)
02/02/89
07/05/00
12/05/80(M)
08/05/97
05/21/01
08/15/89
10/17/89
1 1/20/96
07/17/89
Page 35 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421584#
42169M
421778#
421848#
420755#
421024#
422183#
421025#
422678#
422496#
420285#
421779#
420198#
421915#
42230 1#
421093#
42 1509 A
421634#
422434A
422444
421796#
422487#
42203 8#
421616#
421654#
422152#
420490#
42022 1#
420757#
420267#
420287#
420653#
420654#
421382#
421403#
421190#
421983#
420392#
420332#
422124#
42078 1#
420782#
421094#
421312B
Community Name
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
PENNDEL, BOROUGH OF
PENNSBURG, BOROUGH OF
PENNSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
PEQUEA, TOWNSHIP OF
PERKASIE, BOROUGH OF
PERKIOMEN, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRYOPOLIS, BOROUGH OF
PETERS, TOWNSHIP OF
PETERS, TOWNSHIP OF
PETERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
PETROLIA, BOROUGH OF
PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF
PHILIPSBURG, BOROUGH OF
PHOENIXVILLE, BOROUGH OF
PIATT, TOWNSHIP OF
PICTURE ROCKS, BOROUGH OF
PIKE, TOWNSHIP OF
PIKE, TOWNSHIP OF
PIKE, TOWNSHIP OF
PIKE, TOWNSHIP OF
PILLOW, BOROUGHS OF
PINE CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE GRIVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE GROVE, BOROUGH OF
PINE GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
County
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
PHILADELPHIA
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/85(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
08/15/90(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
09/16/82(R)
10/15/81(R)
10/15/81(R)
09/27/96
03/02/88(R)
12/28/76(R)
09/30/80(R)
03/01/77(R)
02/03/82(R)
05/04/88(R)
08/16/82(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/15/82(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
11/01/86(R)
12/17/82(R)
03/16/88(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/15/89(R)
12/05/89(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/15/90(R)
11/05/80(R)
04/01/80(R)
09/05/90(R)
07/18/83(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/15/89(R)
08/19/91(R)
11/19/87(R)
04/01/77(R)
08/19/87(R)
12/04/79(R)
04/16/90(R)
09/22/78(R)
02/01/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/85(M)
11/15/85(M)
09/02/81
08/15/90
02/18/81
09/16/82
08/05/97
10/15/81
06/20/01 >
12/19/96
1 1/20/96
09/30/80
06/20/01 >
12/19/96
05/04/88
05/21/01
05/01/86(L)
04/15/82
05/01/86(L)
04/01/86(L)
11/01/86(L)
12/17/82(M)
03/16/88
02/03/82
12/02/92
11/01/79
08/15/89
12/05/89
08/02/96
08/15/90
11/20/96
04/01/80
09/05/90
05/21/01
05/01/86(L)
09/15/89
08/19/91
11/19/87
04/01/77
08/19/87
12/04/79
04/16/90
03/16/98
02/01/85(M)
Page 36 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421556#
422392#
421720
420954#
422284#
422445#
422538#
422374A
420062#
420063#
422125#
420620#
421834#
421797#
421147#
42062 1#
420064#
421984#
422548#
421327#
420065#
422539#
421313A
420199#
420504B
420655#
420622C
420623#
420955#
421892#
420286#
421617#
421026#
420838#
421733#
421893#
42067 1#
420783#
420784#
420268#
420520#
420236#
421444#
421132#
421985A
421510A
420333#
421699#
422446A
Community Name
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINECREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
PINEGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PINEY, TOWNSHIP OF
PITCAIRN, BOROUGH OF
PITTSBURGH, CITY OF
PITTSFIELD, TOWNSHIP
PITTSTON, CITY OF
PITTSTON, TOWNSHIP OF
PLAIN GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
PLAINS, TOWNSHIP OF
PLEASANT HILLS, BOROUGH OF
PLEASANT VALLEY,TWP
PLEASANT, TOWNSHIP OF
PLEAS ANTVILLE, BOROUGH OF
PLUM, BOROUGH OF
PLUM, TOWNSHIP OF
PLUMCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
PLUMSTEAD, TOWNSHIP OF
PLUMVILLE, BOROUGH OF
PLUNKETTS CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
PLYMOUTH, BOROUGH OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
PLYMOUTH, TOWNSHIP OF
POCONO, TOWNSHIP OF
POCOPSON, TOWNSHIP OF
POINT MARION, BOROUGH OF
POINT, TOWNSHIP OF
POLK, BOROUGH OF
POLK, TOWNSHIP OF
POLK, TOWNSHIP OF
PORT ALLEGANY, BOROUGH OF
PORT CARBON, BOROUGH OF
PORT CLINTON, BOROUGH OF
PORT MATILDA, BOROUGH OF
PORT ROYAL, BOROUGH OF
PORTAGE, BOROUGH OF
PORTAGE, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTAGE, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTAGE, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
County
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
VENANGO COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/03/89(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/01/86(R)
09/17/80(R)
02/25/83(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
01/03/85(R)
04/01/80(R)
12/15/81(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/02/77(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
08/03/84(R)
01/16/80(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/01/87(R)
01/05/89(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/10/84(R)
11/01/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/02/82(R)
04/01/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
02/15/78(R)
08/05/86(R)
04/15/77(R)
07/04/88(R)
05/02/77(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
06/15/79(R)
01/19/78(R)
02/01/80(R)
1 1/03/89(R)
01/05/78(R)
03/05/90(R)
03/05/90(R)
08/15/78(R)
12/01/86(R)
10/01/86(R)
07/15/88(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/24/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/89
06/19/85(M)
03/01/86(L)
09/17/80
02/25/83(M)
09/28/90
09/10/84(M)
01/03/85(M)
08/05/97
07/05/00
08/10/87(L)
05/02/77
06/15/81
08/03/84(M)
04/06/01
04/06/98
10/04/95
01/01/87(L)
01/05/89
09/30/88
07/05/00
09/10/84(M)
11/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
09/24/84(M)
08/02/82
04/01/77
04/15/77
08/09/99
08/05/86
1 1/20/96
06/16/95
05/02/77
01/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
09/30/87
06/15/79
06/02/95
02/18/98
1 1/03/89
01/05/78
03/05/90
03/05/90
08/15/78
12/01/86(L)
10/01/86(L)
07/15/88
03/16/81
08/24/84(M)
Page 37 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420656B
422500#
422016 A
420729#
421467#
422327#
420705#
420785#
422112#
422171A
421894#
420624#
420866
420427#
422356A
421780#
422328#
421798#
420512#
420824#
422285A
420200#
420563#
422053#
421655#
42 1220 A
420428#
420935#
420122A
421027#
422393#
420067#
420537#
421781#
421314A
421721A
421445#
420145#
420004#
421315A
421511A
422214
421635#
420393#
4220 17A
420334A
420068#
420513#
Community Name
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTER, TOWNSHIP OF
PORTLAND, BOROUGH OF
POTTER, CITY OF
POTTER, TOWNSHIP OF
POTTSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
POTTSVILLE, CITY OF
PRESIDENT, TOWNSHIP OF
PRESTON, TOWNSHIP OF
PRICE, TOWNSHIP OF
PRINGLE, BOROUGH OF
PROMPTON, BOROUGH OF
PROSPECT PARK, BOROUGH OF
PROSPECT, BOROUGH OF
PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
PULASKI, TOWNSHIP OF
PULASKI, TOWNSHIP OF
PUNXSUTAWNEY, BOROUGH OF
PUTNAM, TOWNSHIP OF
PYMATUNING, TOWNSHIP OF
QUAKERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
QUARRYVILLE BOROUGH
QUEMAHOMING, TOWNSHIP OF
QUINCY, TOWNSHIP OF
RACCOON, TOWNSHIP OF
RADNOR, TOWNSHIP OF
RAILROAD, BOROUGH OF
RAINSBURG, BOROUGH OF
RALPHO, TOWNSHIP OF
RANDOLPH, TOWNSHIP OF
RANKIN, BOROUGH OF
RANSOM, TOWNSHIP OF
RAPHO, TOWNSHIP OF
RAYBURN, TOWNSHIP OF
RAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
READE, TOWNSHIP OF
READING, CITY OF
READING, TOWNSHIP OF
REBANK, TOWNSHIP OF
REBANK, TOWNSHIP OF
RED LION, BOROUGH OF
REDSTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
REED, TOWNSHIP OF
REILLY, TOWNSHIP OF
RENOVO, BOROUGH OF
RESERVE, TOWNSHIP OF
REYNOLDSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
County
LYCOMING COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/14/77(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/05/86(R)
12/02/88(R)
09/30/77(R)
07/05/77(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/02/88(R)
05/02/77(R)
06/01/89(R)
03/18/80(R)
02/15/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
06/01/82(R)
12/31/82(R)
02/15/79(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/01/89(R)
07/05/77(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/15/89(R)
07/16/90(R)
10/01/86(R)
08/01/77(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/27/77(R)
02/15/79(R)
07/18/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
02/16/83(R)
11/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
03/19/90(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
06/01/86(R)
05/01/86(R)
06/22/84(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
05/01/86(R)
12/28/76(R)
04/15/77(R)
04/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/14/77
10/06/00
09/01/86(L)
04/06/01
02/05/86(M)
12/02/88
12/19/96
07/05/77
02/06/91
10/15/85(M)
09/02/88
05/02/77
06/01/89
09/30/93
02/15/85(M)
09/30/81
06/01/82
12/31/82(M)
02/15/79
07/02/80
06/01/89(L)
06/20/01 >
01/16/81
08/15/89
07/16/90
10/01/86(L)
09/30/93
09/28/79(M)
05/27/77(M)
02/15/79
07/18/85(M)
10/04/95
04/15/80
02/16/83
11/01/86(L)
08/01/86(L)
03/19/90
05/21/01
06/15/81
06/01/86(L)
05/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
01/06/82
11/01/79
05/01/86(L)
12/28/76
07/05/00
12/22/98
Page 38 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420996#
420479#
421676#
420579
421199#
421095#
422264A
422375A
422540A
421096#
42 1569 A
420825#
420173#
420444#
420445#
420430#
420429#
42020 1#
422447A
422505A
420740#
420999#
421557#
420163#
420146#
420147#
421097#
422562#
420116#
421322#
422394#
421152A
422575#
421098#
422113#
420706#
422045#
420174B
422639A
422395#
420858#
42043 1#
421734B
422255#
420979#
421835#
421895#
420069#
Community Name
RICE, TOWNSHIP OF
RICES LANDING, BOROUGH OF
RICHHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, BOROUGH OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
RICHMOND, TOWNSHIP OF
RIDGEBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
RIDGWAY, BOROUGH OF
RIDGWAY, TOWNSHIP OF
RIDLEY PARK, BOROUGH OF
RIDLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
RIEGELSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
RINGGOLD, TOWNSHIP OF
RINGTOWN, BOROUGH OF
RIVERSIDE, BOROUGH OF
ROARING BROOK, TOWNSHIP OF
ROARING CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
ROARING SPRING, BOROUGH OF
ROBESON, TOWNSHIP OF
ROBESONIA, BOROUGH OF
ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF
ROBINSON, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCHESTER, BOROUGH OF
ROCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKDALE, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKEFELLER, CITY OF
ROCKHILL, BOROUGH OF
ROCKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKLAND,TOWNSHIP OF
ROCKLEDGE, BOROUGH OF
ROCKWOOD, BOROUGH OF
ROME, BOROUGH OF
ROME, TOWNSHIP OF
ROME, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSCOE, BOROUGH OF
ROSE VALLEY, BOROUGH OF
ROSE, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSETO, BOROUGHS OF
ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSS, TOWNSHIP OF
ROSSLYN FARMS, BOROUGH OF
County
LUZERNE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/24/84(R)
10/28/77(R)
09/21/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
12/04/85(R)
10/01/86(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/17/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
02/15/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/02/80(R)
01/06/83(R)
04/17/78(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/25/76(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/30/86(R)
09/01/77(R)
09/03/80(R)
06/18/90(R)
02/03/82(R)
02/25/83(R)
02/01/80(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
07/03/90(R)
09/02/88(R)
10/16/90(R)
10/28/77(R)
06/18/90(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/07/83(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/02/77(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/01/87(R)
12/18/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
02/17/88(R)
05/19/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/02/81
12/19/95
08/24/84(M)
(NSFHA)
03/16/98
06/20/01 >
12/04/85(M)
10/01/86(L)
09/10/84(M)
05/21/01
09/01/86(L)
07/02/80
04/01/81
02/15/80
09/29/78
09/30/93
09/30/93
06/20/01 >
08/24/84(M)
06/25/76(M)
04/15/77
09/28/79
04/30/86
09/01/77
05/21/01
05/21/01
10/04/95
02/25/83(M)
02/01/80
06/15/81
05/01/86(L)
04/01/86(L)
07/03/90
05/21/01
10/16/90
(NSFHA)
06/18/90
02/01/85
09/01/86(L)
01/07/83(M)
10/18/95
09/30/93
09/24/84(M)
04/06/01
03/16/98
04/15/81
02/17/88
10/04/95
Page 39 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422184#
421986#
420839#
420394B
421904#
422302A
421099#
421468#
421597A
421943B
4220 18#
422090A
422099A
420432#
4220 19#
421028#
421488#
422396#
421782#
420352#
422376A
420625#
42 1872 A
422172#
422192#
422497#
420801B
421783#
420591#
420657#
420492A
421636#
420505A
421873C
420677#
421874#
421191#
422541#
421956#
422357A
420123
420175#
420237#
421329
420787#
Community Name
ROSTRAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
ROULETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
ROUSEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
ROY ALTON, BOROUGH OF
ROYERSFORD, BOROUGH OF
RURAL VALLEY,BOROUGH
RUSCOMBMANOR, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUSH, TOWNSHIP OF
RUTLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
RUTLEDGE, BOROUGH OF
RYAN, TOWNSHIP OF
RYE, TOWNSHIP OF
SADSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SADSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SADSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SAEGERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
SALFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
SALISBURY, BOROUGH OF
SALISBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SALISBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SALLADASBURG, BOROUGH OF
SALTILLO, BOROUGH OF
SALTLICK, TOWNSHIP OF
SALTSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SANDY CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDY LAKE, BOROUGH OF
SANDY LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDY, TOWNSHIP OF
SANDYCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SAVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
SAXONBURG, BOROUGH OF
SAXTON, BOROUGH OF
SAYRE, BOROUGH OF
SCALP LEVEL, CITY OF
SCHELLSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SCHUYLKILL HAVEN, BOROUGHS OF
County
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/02/82(R)
08/19/91(R)
05/19/87(R)
04/15/77(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
05/01/85(R)
02/02/89(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
01/28/77(R)
01/07/83(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/01/83(R)
08/15/79(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/19/91(R)
01/16/81(R)
06/18/90(R)
01/03/85(R)
03/18/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
07/15/88(R)
04/17/85(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
01/03/79(R)
01/05/79(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/01/86(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
09/03/82(R)
09/06/89(R)
10/16/90(R)
03/04/88(R)
04/17/85(R)
01/26/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
10/17/86(R)
06/30/76(R)
12/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/97
01/19/96
05/19/87
04/15/77
12/19/96
05/01/85(M)
05/21/01
11/16/90
08/19/85(M)
01/28/77(M)
01/07/83(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/01/87(L)
09/30/93
04/01/83(M)
08/15/79
1 1/20/96
08/19/91
01/16/81
06/18/90
01/03/85(M)
03/18/80
05/01/86(L)
07/15/88
08/05/97(M)
12/19/96
09/24/84(M)
04/15/81
02/01/84
01/20/82(M)
10/19/85(M)
03/18/91
09/24/84(M)
10/01/86(L)
03/18/91
09/03/82(M)
09/06/89
10/16/90
03/04/88
04/17/85(M)
(NSFHA)
04/15/77
10/17/86
(NSFHA)
1 1/06/96
Page 40 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421489#
422020#
421905#
421100#
421004#
421757#
421799#
422173#
420896#
420538#
422542#
425387#
420203#
422474#
420936#
42273 8#
42007 1#
420072#
420070#
422193#
422054#
421101#
420809A
42074 1#
421159#
420802A
420433#
420678#
421987#
420073#
420682
422126A
420506#
420788A
421029#
421875#
421102#
420626B
420148#
420764#
421103#
422100A
420368#
Community Name
SCHUYLKILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SCHUYLKILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SCHWENKSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
SCOTT, TOWNSHIP OF
SCOTTDALE, BOROUGH OF
SCRANTON, CITY OF
SCRUBGRASS, TOWNSHIP OF
SELINSGROVE, BOROUGH OF
SELLERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SERGEANT, TOWNSHIP OF
SEVEN VALLEYS, BOROUGH OF
SEWARD, BOROUGH OF
SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, BOROUGH
SEWICKLEY HILLS, BOROUGH OF
SEWICKLEY, BOROUGH OF
SEWICKLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
SHADE, TOWNSHIP OF
SHALER, TOWNSHIP OF
SHAMOKIN DAM, BOROUGH OF
SHAMOKIN, CITY OF
SHAMOKIN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHANKSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SHARON HILL, BOROUGH OF
SHARON, CITY OF
SHARON, TOWNSHIP OF
SHARPSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SHARPSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SHEFFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SHELOCTA, BOROUGH OF
SHENANDOAH, BOROUGH OF
SHENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
SHENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
SHESHEQUIN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHICKSHINNY, BOROUGH OF
on probation eff.:04/09/92
SHILLINGTON, BOROUGH OF
SHINGLEHOUSE, BOROUGH OF
SHIPPEN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIPPEN, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIPPENSBURG, BOROUGH OF
County
CHESTER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SOMERSET COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/05/80(R)
03/11/83(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
05/17/90(R)
11/01/86(R)
12/04/85(R)
11/18/81(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/05/91(R)
05/04/73(R)
02/15/78(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/09/98(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/14/79(R)
06/01/78(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/01/77(R)
12/16/80(R)
03/05/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/15/79(R)
10/17/78(R)
08/19/91(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/05/89(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
12/31/76(R)
08/01/77(R)
08/05/91(R)
04/17/78(R)
12/01/86(R)
03/15/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/20/96
03/11/83(M)
12/19/96
10/04/95
09/02/81
05/17/90
11/01/86(L)
12/04/85(M)
08/05/97
08/15/80
08/05/91
11/17/82
06/20/01 >
07/03/85(M)
09/28/79(M)
08/05/97
10/04/95
10/04/95
10/04/95
08/05/97
02/06/91
07/05/00
03/01/77
12/16/80
03/05/90
09/24/84(M)
09/30/93
10/17/78
08/19/91
07/05/00
(NSFHA)
12/01/86(L)
12/05/89
05/01/86(L)
04/03/78
09/04/91
01/02/81
12/31/76
05/21/01
08/05/91
04/17/78
12/01/86(L)
03/15/79
Page 41 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421585#
420117#
420369A
421700#
420493A
420149#
421969#
421148#
422066#
422230#
422091 A
420370#
422338#
420150#
421149#
420592#
421506#
421414
420222A
422466#
420672#
422153#
421104A
420494#
421896#
420899#
421349#
421459#
421198#
421393#
421735#
420742#
420202#
420803#
422055#
422154A
421906#
421758#
420580#
422329A
421214B
420100B
Community Name
SHIPPENSBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIPPINGPORT, BOROUGH OF
SHIREMANSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
SHIRLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
SHIRLEYSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SHOEMAKERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SHOHOLA, TOWNSHIP OF
SHREWSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SHREWSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SHREWSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SILVER LAKE, TOWNSHIP OF
SILVER SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SILVERDALE, BOROUGH OF
SINKING SPRING, BOROUGH OF
SKIPPACK, TOWNSHIP OF
SLATINGTON, BOROUGH OF
SLIGO, BOROUGH OF
SLIPPERY ROCK, BOROUGH OF
SLIPPERY ROCK, TOWNSHIP OF
SLIPPERY ROCK, TOWNSHIP OF
SMETHPORT, BOROUGH OF
SMITH, TOWNSHIP OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SMITHTON, BOROUGH OF
SNAKE SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SNOW SHOE, BOROUGH OF
SNOW SHOE, TOWNSHIP OF
SNYDER, TOWNSHIP OF
SNYDER, TOWNSHIP OF
SNYDERTOWN, CITY OF
SOLEBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SOMERSET, BOROUGH OF
SOMERSET, TOWNSHIP OF
SOMERSET, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUDERTON, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH ABINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH ANNVILLE, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH BEND,TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH BETHLEHEM, BOROUGH OF
County
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
BUCKS COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/04/88(R)
08/19/91(R)
01/05/79(R)
08/15/89(R)
04/15/86(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/15/88(R)
12/15/90(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/02/83(R)
01/05/84(R)
08/16/82(R)
03/01/82(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/15/90(R)
11/30/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/01/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
07/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/15/77(R)
03/04/88(R)
08/15/90(R)
07/04/88(R)
08/10/79(R)
06/19/89(R)
02/02/83(R)
09/06/89(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/15/77(R)
ll/27/76(R)
05/17/90(R)
07/01/86(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/05/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/04/88
08/19/91
01/05/79(M)
09/20/96
04/15/86(M)
05/21/01
10/06/00
12/15/90
08/01/87(L)
09/16/81
09/01/86(L)
03/03/92
06/20/01 >
05/21/01
12/19/96
03/16/81
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
09/01/86(L)
11/01/86(L)
04/17/78
07/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
07/16/96
12/06/99
08/05/97
07/04/88
08/10/79(M)
06/19/89
02/02/83
09/06/89
09/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
03/03/92
07/02/92
07/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
12/15/82
12/16/80
09/01/86(L)
06/05/85(M)
02/15/85(M)
Page 42 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421210#
422174A
421137#
420288#
421490#
421105#
421106#
42023 8#
422563#
420900#
420395#
421107#
422330#
422194#
420581#
421043#
422439A
422022#
42037 1#
422467
421586#
421165#
42027 1#
421876#
420335
422397#
422155#
421637#
421281#
420176#
420593#
420658#
421350#
421587#
421657#
422523#
421351#
420239#
42090 1#
421957#
422127A
420240#
422398#
421561#
422138#
420289#
Community Name
SOUTH BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH CANAAN, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH CENTRE, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH COATESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH COVENTRY, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH FAYETTE, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH FORK, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH GREENSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH HEIDELBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH HUNTINGDON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH LONDONDERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH MAHONING, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH MANHEIM, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH MIDDLETON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH NEW CASTLE, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH NEWTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH PARK, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH PHILIPSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH PYMATUNING, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH RENOVO, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH SHENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH STRABANE, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH VERSAILLES, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH WAVERLY, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH WHITEHALL, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT, BOROUGH OF
SOUTH WOODBURY, CITY OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTHHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTHMONT, BOROUGH OF
SOUTHWEST GREENSBURG, BORO OF
SOUTHWEST MADISON, TOWNSHIP OF
SOUTHWEST, TOWNSHIP OF
SPANGLER, BOROUGH OF
SPARTA, TOWNSHIP OF
SPARTANSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SPEERS, BOROUGH OF
SPRING CITY, BOROUGH OF
County
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/18/87(R)
08/19/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
05/03/82(R)
07/18/83(R)
09/05/90(R)
02/03/82(R)
03/19/90(R)
07/17/89(R)
07/03/86(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/17/90(R)
08/15/83(R)
08/15/90(R)
12/15/81(R)
03/04/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/04/89(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
07/31/78(R)
08/04/88(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
09/05/90(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
02/02/77(R)
07/03/85(R)
04/15/80(R)
04/16/91(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/01/78(R)
04/15/77(R)
02/19/86(R)
08/04/88(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/02/90(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/15/85(R)
08/15/89(R)
01/28/83(R)
1 l/23/79(R)
07/16/81(R)
03/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/23/00
08/19/85(M)
11/19/80
11/20/96
1 1/20/96
09/05/90
10/04/95
03/19/90
07/17/89
08/05/97
05/02/77
05/21/01
08/15/83
08/05/97
08/15/83
06/06/00
09/24/84(M)
11/06/96
01/05/96
(NSFHA)
08/04/88
10/04/95
09/05/90
03/18/91
02/02/77
07/03/85(M)
04/15/80
04/16/91
10/04/95
06/18/80
02/01/78
04/15/77
02/19/86(M)
08/04/88
05/15/86
09/24/84(M)
09/01/87(L)
04/02/90
08/05/97
08/19/85(M)
05/15/85(M)
08/15/89
01/28/83(M)
1 l/23/79(M)
12/19/95
1 1/20/96
Page 43 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421614#
422128A
420937#
42093 8#
421108
420269#
42 1570 A
421958#
422039#
420353#
421759#
421282#
420074#
421031#
421109#
420204#
420434#
421369#
421638#
421701#
421877#
425388#
42223 1#
421639#
42 1677 A
422092
42262 1#
421745A
420786#
422191#
421328
420151#
420446#
421656#
421406#
420867#
420270#
420396#
422175#
421571#
421407#
421988#
421640#
421546#
420859#
420730#
420679#
Community Name
SPRING CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING GARDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING GROVE, BOROUGH OF
SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRING, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGBORO, BOROUGHS OF
SPRINGBROOK, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGDALE, BOROUGH OF
SPRINGDALE, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGETTSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRINGVILLE, CITY OF
SPRUCE CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SPRUCE HILL, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. CLAIR, BOROUGH OF
ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
ST. CLAIRSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
ST. LAWRENCE, BOROUGH OF
ST. MARYS, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE TOWNSHIP OF BENZINGER
ST. THOMAS, TOWNSHIP OF
STANDING STONE, TOWNSHIP OF
STARRUCCA, BOROUGH OF
STATE COLLEGE, BOROUGH OF
STEELTON, BOROUGH OF
STERLING, TOWNSHIP OF
STEUBEN, TOWNSHIP OF
STEVENS, TOWNSHIP OF
STEWARDSON, TOWNSHIP OF
STEWART, TOWNSHIP OF
STILL WATER, BOROUGH OF
STOCKDALE, BOROUGH OF
STOCKERTOWN, BOROUGH OF
STONEBORO, BOROUGH OF
County
ELK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ELK COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/01/86(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/15/77(R)
08/15/83(R)
04/18/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/12/82(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/10/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
12/15/77(R)
05/01/86(R)
01/03/79(R)
01/19/78(R)
12/01/82(R)
04/16/91(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/16/82(R)
07/07/72(R)
04/01/81(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
08/24/84(R)
04/01/86(R)
03/02/89(R)
10/15/85(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/18/87(R)
10/05/84(R)
12/16/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/16/90(R)
09/18/87(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/30/76(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/03/82(R)
07/16/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
01/01/87(R)
08/15/89(R)
07/16/81(R)
12/04/79(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/01/86(L)
09/01/87(L)
06/15/77
08/15/83
05/21/01
10/18/83
09/01/86(L)
11/12/82(M)
03/16/88
09/30/87
01/20/82(M)
07/05/00
07/05/00
06/04/96
05/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
09/30/93
12/01/82
04/16/91
12/04/85(M)
07/16/82(M)
12/19/96
04/01/81
03/18/91
08/24/84(M)
04/01/86(L)
03/02/89
10/15/85(M)
06/02/95
08/05/97
05/21/01
08/03/98
07/16/90
09/18/87
02/17/88
09/30/92
04/15/77
08/19/91
07/16/90
09/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
01/01/87(L)
08/15/89
12/19/95
04/06/01
03/18/91
Page 44 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42024 1#
422524B
421110#
421259#
421784#
420152#
420693#
420694#
420842#
422489#
422549A
421820
420840#
422303#
421558#
420997#
421183A
420242#
421446#
422399#
420514#
421451#
422358A
422400#
42241 8#
422502#
422056A
420743#
420816#
421447#
420397#
421746#
420659#
420902#
420435#
420398#
420582#
421989#
420075#
420627#
4205 15B
420177#
42 1990 A
425389A
420076#
42073 1#
420539#
421394#
421469B
Community Name
STONYCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
STONYCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF
STRABAN, TOWNSHIP OF
STRASBURG, TOWNSHIP OF
STRAUSSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
STROUD, TOWNSHIP OF
STROUDSBURG, BOROUGH OF
SUGAR GROVE, BOROUGH OF
SUGAR GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
SUGAR GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
SUGAR NOTCH, BOROUGH OF
SUGARCREEK, BOROUGH OF
SUGARCREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
SUGARLOAF, TOWNSHIP OF
SUGARLOAF, TOWNSHIP OF
SULLIVAN, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMERHILL, BOROUGH OF
SUMMERHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMERHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMERVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SUMMIT HILL, BOROUGH OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUMMIT, TOWNSHIP OF
SUNBURY, CITY OF
SUSQUEHANNA DEPOT, BOROUGH OF
SUSQUEHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
SUSQUEHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
SUSQUEHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
SUSQUEHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
SUTERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SWARTHMORE, BOROUGH OF
SWATARA, TOWNSHIP OF
SWATARA, TOWNSHIP OF
SWEDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
SWISSVALE, BOROUGH OF
SWOYERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SYKESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
SYLVANIA, BOROUGH OF
SYLVANIA, TOWNSHIP OF
TAMAQUA,BOROUGH OF
TARENTUM, BOROUGH OF
TAT AMY, BOROUGH OF
TAYLOR, BOROUGH OF
TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
County
CAMBRIA COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/15/78(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/15/80(R)
07/16/81(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
02/11/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/31/76(R)
08/15/90(R)
09/17/82(R)
02/15/85(R)
06/30/76(R)
05/19/87(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/04/89(R)
07/02/80(R)
03/01/87(R)
03/19/90(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/25/82(R)
07/03/90(R)
12/14/79(R)
02/15/85(R)
05/19/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
09/24/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
07/18/77(R)
10/15/80(R)
ll/24/78(R)
04/15/77(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
05/16/77(R)
02/03/82(R)
12/01/81(R)
08/19/91(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/15/77(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/03/78(R)
01/01/87(R)
1 2/03/7 1(R)
08/15/80(R)
12/04/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/30/80(R)
01/03/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/06/98
08/19/85(M)
10/04/95
07/16/81
02/04/81
05/21/01
11/16/95
05/19/97
08/15/90
09/17/82(M)
02/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
05/19/87
10/15/85(M)
07/04/89
07/02/80
03/01/87(L)
03/19/90
09/04/85(M)
06/25/82(M)
07/03/90
12/14/79(M)
02/15/85(M)
05/19/87
09/16/81
09/24/84(M)
09/10/84(M)
07/18/77
10/15/80
ll/24/78(M)
04/15/77
06/01/82
09/28/79
08/05/97
09/30/93
02/03/82
12/01/81
08/19/91
10/04/95(M)
11/05/82
08/19/86(M)
04/03/78
01/01/87(L)
10/31/75
07/05/00
04/06/01
08/15/80
09/30/80
01/03/86(M)
Page 45 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421663#
42 1800 A
421702#
420153#
421111#
422176#
422582A
421664#
422583A
420521#
420077#
420290#
425390#
422459#
421224#
422576#
420540#
422114 A
421112#
422448A
420205#
421605#
420827
420828#
421648#
420468#
420354#
421959#
422377A
421897#
421665#
421703#
420154#
422236#
42 145 8 A
420178#
421113#
420790A
42240 IB
420903#
420437#
421907#
42029 1#
Community Name
TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
TELL, TOWNSHIP OF
TEMPLE, BOROUGH OF
TERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
TEXAS, TOWNSHIP OF
THOMPSON, BOROUGH OF
THOMPSON, TOWNSHIP OF
THOMPSON, TOWNSHIP OF
THOMPSONTOWN, BOROUGH OF
THORNBURG, BOROUGH OF
THORNBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
THORNBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
THORNHURST, TOWHSHIP OF
THE TOWNSHIP NAME WAS CHANGED FROM LEHIGH
TO THORNHURST EFFECTIVE DECEMBER, 1995.
THORNHURST, TOWNSHIP OF
FORMERLY THE TOWNSHIP OF LEHIGH
THREE SPRING,BOROUGH OF
THROOP, BOROUGH OF
TIDIOUTE, BOROUGH OF
TILDEN, TOWNSHIP OF
TIMBLIN, BOROUGH OF
TINICUM, TOWNSHIP OF
TINICUM, TOWNSHIP OF
TIOGA, BOROUGH OF
TIOGA, TOWNSHIP OF
TIONESTA, BOROUGHS OF
TIONESTA, TOWNSHIP OF
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF
TOBOYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
TOBY, TOWNSHIP OF
TOBYHANNA, TOWNSHIP OF
TODD, TOWNSHIP OF
TODD, TOWNSHIP OF
TOPTON, BOROUGH OF
TOWAMENCIN, TOWNSHIP OF
TOWAMENSING, TOWNSHIP OF
TOWANDA, BOROUGH OF
TOWANDA, TOWNSHIP OF
TOWER CITY, CITY OF
TOWNVILLE, BOROUGH OF
TRAFFORD, BOROUGH OF
TRAINER, BOROUGH OF
TRAPPE, BOROUGH OF
TREDYFFRIN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
FULTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
06/11/82(R)
07/18/77(R)
06/18/90(R)
09/30/87(R)
06/30/76(R)
06/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
07/18/83(R)
03/01/77(R)
07/24/73(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/14/83(R)
10/01/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
02/15/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
02/01/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
05/01/88(R)
08/15/80(R)
11/05/86(R)
02/15/85(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
12/16/88(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/15/89(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/02/80(R)
11/01/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/15/85(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
01/20/82(R)
04/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/86(L)
08/03/84(M)
06/11/82(M)
12/05/97
06/18/90
06/02/94
06/30/76(M)
06/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
05/19/81
(NSFHA)
1 1/20/96
09/30/93
06/15/81
01/14/83(M)
10/01/82(M)
09/28/79
02/15/85(M)
05/21/01
09/24/84(M)
06/20/01 >
09/30/93
05/01/88(L)
08/15/80
11/05/86
09/29/86
02/15/78
09/04/85(M)
01/03/85(M)
12/16/88
02/09/01
08/15/89
05/21/01
03/02/98
11/01/86(L)
03/16/81
08/17/81
09/01/86(L)
02/15/85(M)
08/05/97
09/30/93
12/19/96
11/20/96
Page 46 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42079 1#
422023#
422550A
420315
420179#
421114#
421572#
420206#
421115#
4209 17#
421898#
422206#
420522#
420744#
420079#
421116#
422452#
421960#
422564#
420164#
421163B
421395#
421961#
421218#
422503A
421991#
420453#
421261
420155#
421470#
421531#
421573B
421370#
422430#
421704#
422449#
421801#
421806#
421836#
421883#
422024A
422040#
421184#
420834#
420860#
420466#
420272#
Community Name
TREMONT, BOROUGH OF
TREMONT, TOWNSHIP OF
TRIUMPH, TOWNSHIP OF
TROUTVILLE, CITY OF
TROY, BOROUGH OF
TROY, TOWNSHIP OF
TROY, TOWNSHIP OF
TULLYTOWN, BOROUGH OF
TULPEHOCKEN, TOWHSHIP OF
TUNKHANNOCK, BOROUGH OF
TUNKHANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
TUNKHANNOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
TURBETT, TOWNSHIP OF
TURBOT, TOWNSHIP OF
TURTLE CREEK, BOROUGH OF
TUSCARORA, TOWNSHIP OF
TUSCARORA, TOWNSHIP OF
TUSCARORA, TOWNSHIP OF
TWILIGHT, BOROUGH OF
TYRONE, BOROUGH OF
TYRONE, TOWNSHIP OF
TYRONE, TOWNSHIP OF
TYRONE, TOWNSHIP OF
ULSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
ULYSSES, BOROUGH OF
ULYSSES, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION CITY, BOROUGH OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNION, TOWNSHIP OF
UNIONTOWN, CITY OF
UNIONVILLE, BOROUGH OF
County
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/04/80(R)
09/05/79(R)
02/15/85(R)
12/17/85(R)
01/01/82(R)
12/15/90(R)
06/18/90(R)
02/01/80(R)
08/04/88(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/15/88(R)
03/01/78(R)
08/15/79(R)
11/19/80(R)
10/22/82(R)
01/15/88(R)
11/19/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
05/02/83(R)
06/01/89(R)
06/18/80(R)
03/04/88(R)
09/18/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/04/85(R)
08/15/77(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/01/87(R)
02/15/85(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/25/83(R)
03/02/89(R)
01/17/85(R)
11/05/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/01/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/17/82(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
02/02/77(R)
05/01/78(R)
11/03/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/04/80
09/05/79
02/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
01/01/82(M)
12/15/90
06/18/90
06/20/01 >
05/21/01
08/23/99
09/04/85(M)
08/23/99
03/01/78
08/15/79
10/04/95
10/22/82(M)
01/15/88
11/19/82(M)
09/28/79(M)
05/02/83
06/01/89(L)
06/18/80
03/04/88
09/18/87
01/01/87(L)
06/01/87(L)
09/28/79(M)
12/04/85(M)
05/21/01
07/17/89
09/01/87(L)
02/15/85(M)
09/16/81
02/25/83(M)
08/02/94
01/17/85(M)
11/05/82(M)
12/04/79
09/30/80
06/01/87(L)
09/01/86(L)
11/17/82
02/01/87(L)
08/01/79
12/19/95
05/01/78
11/03/89
Page 47 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420964#
42043 8#
420372#
420745#
421118#
422195#
420439#
420440#
420708#
420660#
421588#
421916#
420956#
421917#
421785#
421044#
42 1944 A
422025#
420207#
420957#
421589#
421815#
421909#
421933#
421934#
422278#
420399#
421910#
42044 1#
420709#
421918#
420594B
420989#
421119#
421120#
422525#
420467#
421491#
422257#
Community Name
UNITY, TOWNSHIP OF
UPLAND, BOROUGH OF
UPPER ALLEN, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER AUGUSTA, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER BERN, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER BURRELL, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER CHICHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER DARBY, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER FAIRFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER FRANKFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER FREDERICK, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER GWYNEDD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER LEACOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MACUNGIE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MAHANOY, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MAHANTONGO, TOWN OF
UPPER MAKEFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MERION, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MIFFLIN, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MORELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER MT. BETHEL, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER NAZARETH, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER OXFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER PAXTON, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER POTTSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER SALFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER SAUCON, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER SOUTHAMPTON, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER TULPEHOCKEN, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER TURKEYFOOT, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER TYRONE, TOWNSHIP OF
UPPER UWCHLAN, TWP OF
UPPER YODER, TOWNSHIP OF
County
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
BERKS COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/17/78(R)
12/10/76(R)
02/15/80(R)
05/02/77(R)
11/05/82(R)
12/15/81(R)
05/16/77(R)
03/01/78(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/17/80(R)
04/05/88(R)
08/17/81(R)
03/01/78(R)
01/20/82(R)
11/03/78(R)
04/02/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/17/90(R)
10/17/78(R)
11/16/77(R)
ll/26/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
09/02/82(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
02/25/83(R)
02/25/83(R)
09/05/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/15/77(R)
07/03/78(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/15/77(R)
04/03/78(R)
03/15/84(R)
07/16/82(R)
09/10/84(R)
03/15/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
04/02/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/97
09/30/93
02/15/80
05/02/77
05/21/01
08/05/97
09/30/93
09/30/93
12/19/96
09/17/80
04/05/88
12/19/96
03/02/98
04/21/99
11/03/78(M)
04/02/79
09/01/86(L)
01/17/90
06/20/01 >
08/09/99
ll/26/82(M)
05/19/81
12/19/96
04/06/01
04/06/01
1 1/20/96
09/05/79
12/19/96
09/30/93
12/19/96
12/19/96
07/15/77(M)
06/20/01 >
07/05/00
05/21/01
09/10/84(M)
03/15/79
1 1/20/96
04/02/90
Page 48 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420804#
420841#
421492#
420223#
421316A
421206#
421924#
42 1620 A
420904#
42 1748 A
421320#
422359A
421574B
421371#
421575#
42261 1#
42008 1#
422543#
420243#
421790#
421471#
422577A
420523#
422026#
420082#
421493#
420732#
421791B
422101#
420990#
420843#
421408#
422427#
420208#
422232#
422270A
421705#
422450#
420209#
421494#
421786#
420861#
421317#
421383#
420224#
421448#
422378A
421598#
Community Name
URSINA, BOROUGH OF
UTICA, BOROUGH OF
UWCHLAN, TOWNSHIP OF
VALENCIA, BOROUGH OF
VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
VALLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
VANDERBILT, BOROUGH OF
VANDERGRIFT, BOROUGH OF
VANDLING, CITY OF
VANPORT, TOWNSHIP OF
VENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
VENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
VENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
VERNON, TOWNSHIP OF
VERONA, BOROUGH OF
VERSAILLES, BOROUGHS OF
VICTORY, TOWNSHIP OF
VINTONDALE, BOROUGH OF
VOLANT, BOROUGH OF
WALKER, TOWNSHIP OF
WALKER, TOWNSHIP OF
WALKER, TOWNSHIP OF
WALKER, TOWNSHIP OF
WALL, BOROUGHS OF
WALLACE, TOWNSHIP OF
WALNUTPORT, BOROUGH OF
WAMPUM, BOROUGH OF
WARD, TOWNSHIP OF
WARMINSTER, TOWNSHIP OF
WARREN, BOROUGH OF
WARREN, TOWNSHIP OF
WARREN, TOWNSHIP OF
WARRINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WARRINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WARRIOR RUN, BOROUGH OF
WARRIORS MARK, TOWNSHIP OF
WARSAW, TOWNSHIP OF
WARWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
WARWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
WARWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, CITY OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
County
SOMERSET COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
VENANGO COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JUNIATA COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CLARION COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/18/90(R)
03/04/9 1(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/04/89(R)
10/01/86(R)
08/01/84(R)
08/19/91(R)
01/01/87(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/01/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
07/16/90(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/18/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/19/90(R)
09/28/79(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/01/78(R)
12/05/89(R)
11/19/87(R)
03/11/83(R)
06/01/78(R)
08/03/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/01/78(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/25/76(R)
03/02/89(R)
01/17/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/01/84(R)
11/19/80(R)
1 1/05/86(R)
02/04/88(R)
06/01/84(R)
02/15/85(R)
11/03/89(R)
02/01/85(R)
12/17/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/18/90
03/04/91
1 1/20/96
05/04/89
10/01/86(L)
1 1/20/96
05/02/94
01/01/87(L)
08/05/97
09/01/86(L)
02/01/80
05/01/85(M)
02/01/85(M)
09/30/81
07/16/90
07/05/00
10/04/95
09/24/84(M)
03/19/90
09/28/79(M)
08/15/90
09/10/84(M)
08/01/78
12/05/89
08/05/97
11/20/96
04/06/01
08/03/84(M)
07/01/87(L)
06/20/01 >
08/19/87
09/01/86(L)
09/01/86(L)
06/20/01 >
03/16/83
06/25/76(M)
03/02/89
01/17/85(M)
06/20/01 >
11/20/96
11/19/80
1 1/05/86
02/04/88
12/05/97
02/15/85(M)
11/03/89
02/01/85(M)
12/17/87
Page 49 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421372#
421641#
421658#
421678B
421722#
42245 1#
422468#
421816#
422613A
421156#
421945#
422506#
42204 1#
422196#
422207#
421150#
42071 5#
420454#
422419#
42066 1#
42255 1#
420746#
420756#
420455#
420868#
421318B
420336#
421576#
421599#
421373#
42 1679 A
422469#
421240#
422027A
420473#
420480#
420255#
421817A
420256#
422526A
421121#
421666#
420829#
420940B
421374#
420456#
421760#
422507#
Community Name
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTONVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WATERFORD, BOROUGH OF
WATERFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WATSON, TOWNSHIP OF
WATSON, TOWNSHIP OF
WATSONTOWN, BOROUGH OF
WATTS, TOWNSHIP OF
WATTSBURG, BOROUGH OF
WAYMART, BOROUGH OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF
WAYNESBORO, BOROUGH OF
WAYNESBURG, BOROUGH OF
WEATHERLY, BOROUGH OF
WEISENBERG, TOWNSHIP OF
WEISSPORT, BOROUGH OF
WELLERSBURG, BOROUGH OF
WELLS, TOWNSHIP OF
WELLS, TOWNSHIP OF
WELLSBORO, BOROUGH OF
WELLSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WERNERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WESLEYVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WEST ABLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BEAVER, TOWNSHIP OF
County
ERIE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
PERRY COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
FULTON COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
ERIE COUNTY
LACKAWANNA
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/19/81(R)
01/20/82(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/03/84(R)
04/16/90(R)
09/06/89(R)
09/24/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/30/88(R)
12/15/78(R)
02/02/90(R)
05/15/86(R)
04/16/82(R)
07/03/90(R)
03/02/83(R)
08/10/79(R)
12/15/81(R)
02/17/82(R)
10/15/80(R)
05/01/85(R)
01/02/80(R)
08/15/79(R)
05/19/81(R)
1 0/30/8 1(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/16/90(R)
08/05/85(R)
12/14/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
05/03/82(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/01/86(R)
11/01/85(R)
06/17/86(R)
12/05/89(R)
10/15/85(R)
02/02/90(R)
06/01/89(R)
09/05/90(R)
05/01/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
12/31/82(R)
08/02/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
01/20/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/19/81
09/06/95
06/17/91
08/03/84(M)
04/16/90
09/06/89
09/24/84(M)
04/15/81
12/01/86(L)
04/06/01
12/15/78(M)
02/02/90
05/15/86
08/05/97
07/03/90
03/02/83
08/10/79(M)
12/15/81
09/30/83
10/15/80
05/01/85(M)
01/02/80
08/15/79
05/19/81
1 0/30/8 1(M)
06/05/85(M)
11/01/79
07/16/90
08/05/85(M)
12/14/79(M)
08/24/84(M)
05/03/82
03/02/81
09/01/86(L)
11/01/85
06/17/86
12/05/89
10/15/85(M)
02/02/90
06/01/89(L)
09/05/90
05/01/86(L)
04/15/81
12/31/82(M)
05/21/01
07/16/81
01/20/82(M)
09/24/84(M)
Page 50 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
422156A
421495#
421992#
421496#
425391#
422028#
422106#
421122#
421497#
421946#
421449#
420292#
421033#
421787#
420710#
420583#
421299#
421788#
420959#
420733#
420083#
420373B
422602#
42265 1#
422565A
422304A
420293#
421600#
421821
421925A
421789#
420084#
421542#
420566#
421166#
420905#
420225A
420792#
422233#
422234#
422279#
42233 1#
420356#
420680#
420085#
Community Name
WEST BETHLEHEM, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BRADFORD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BRANCH, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BRAND YWINE, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BROWNSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WEST BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BUFFALO, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST BURLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CALN, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CAMERON, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CARROLL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CHESTER, BOROUGH OF
WEST CHILLISQUAQUE, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST COCALICO, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST CONSHOHOCKEN, BOROUGH OF
WEST CORNWALL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST DEER, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST DONEGAL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST EARL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST EASTON, BOROUGH OF
WEST ELIZABETH, BOROUGH OF
WEST FAIRVIEW, BOROUGH OF
WEST FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST FALLOWFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST FINLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST FRANKLIN,TOWNSHIP OF
WEST GOSHEN, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST HANOVER, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST HAZLETON, BOROUGH OF
WEST HEMLOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST HEMPFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST HOMESTEAD, BOROUGH OF
WEST KEATING, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST LAMPETER, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST LEBANON, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST LEECHBURG, BOROUGH OF
WEST LIBERTY, CITY OF
WEST MAHANOY, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST MANCHESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST MANHEIM, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST MARLBOROUGH, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST MAYFIELD, BOROUGH OF
WEST MEAD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST MIDDLESEX, BOROUGH OF
WEST MIFFLIN, BOROUGH OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
LANCASTER COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LEBANON COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
12/01/86(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/27/73(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/05/90(R)
01/17/85(R)
01/17/90(R)
08/04/88(R)
07/05/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
12/14/79(R)
10/18/83(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/19/81(R)
03/01/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
02/16/77(R)
04/01/83(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
11/02/77(R)
03/18/80(R)
07/31/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
10/01/86(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
04/15/77(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/16/83(R)
01/18/84(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
06/15/77(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
02/15/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/86(L)
1 1/20/96
12/01/86(L)
11/20/96
09/06/95
08/19/97
09/30/87
09/05/90
1 1/20/96
01/17/90
08/04/88
11/20/96
04/15/77
04/15/81
08/09/99
12/14/79(M)
10/04/95
07/16/81
05/19/81
04/06/01
10/04/95
02/16/77
11/20/96
07/03/85(M)
09/24/84(M)
05/01/85(M)
11/20/96
03/18/80
(NSFHA)
08/01/87(L)
09/22/99
10/04/95
10/01/86(L)
06/11/82
06/17/86
11/20/00
09/01/86(L)
04/01/83(M)
06/15/81
03/16/83
1 1/20/96
04/15/81
06/15/77
09/04/91
08/05/97
Page 51 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
42149M
420906#
42071 1#
422280#
422029#
421590#
422042#
422157A
421151#
420628B
421133#
421353#
420156#
421123#
42228 1#
422490#
422402#
421354#
421450#
421499#
421724#
420295#
420629#
420941
421706#
421970#
422093A
421185A
421139#
4203 17#
420294#
421861#
421642#
421993#
421035#
42068 1#
420087#
421034#
420630#
420089#
422258#
421725#
420088#
420595#
421680B
420712#
420713#
Community Name
WEST NANTMEAL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST NEWTON, BOROUGH OF
WEST NORRITON, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST NOTTINGHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PENN, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PENNSBORO, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PERRY, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PIKE RUN, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PIKELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PITTSTON, BOROUGH OF
WEST POTTSGROVE, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST PROVIDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST READING, BOROUGH OF
WEST ROCKHILL, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST SADSBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST SALEM, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST SHENANGO, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST ST. CLAIR, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST TAYLOR, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST VINCENT, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST WHEATFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST WHITELAND, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST WYOMING, BOROUGH OF
WEST YORK, BOROUGH OF
WEST, TOWNSHIP OF
WESTFALL, TOWNSHIP OF
WESTFIELD, BOROUGH OF
WESTFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WESTMONT, BOROUGH OF
WESTOVER, BOROUGH OF
WESTTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
WETMORE, TOWNSHIP OF
WHARTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WHARTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WHEATFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WHEATLAND, BOROUGH OF
WHITAKER, BOROUGH OF
WHITE DEER, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITE HAVEN, BOROUGH OF
WHITE OAK, BOROUGH OF
WHITE, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITE, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITEHALL, BOROUGH OF
WHITEHALL, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITELEY, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITEMARSH, TOWNSHIP OF
WHITPAIN, TOWNSHIP OF
County
CHESTER COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
SCHUYLKILL
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SNYDER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LEHIGH COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/84(R)
07/18/77(R)
09/30/77(R)
10/15/85(R)
02/02/90(R)
03/04/88(R)
12/03/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/01/83(R)
04/15/77(R)
11/01/79(R)
07/04/89(R)
03/16/76(R)
07/05/84(R)
08/05/85(R)
01/21/83(R)
02/01/85(R)
07/17/89(R)
03/19/90(R)
11/19/87(R)
04/02/90(R)
05/02/77(R)
04/15/77(R)
07/31/79(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/02/89(R)
03/01/87(R)
03/01/87(R)
10/13/78(R)
08/15/89(R)
06/01/77(R)
04/01/87(R)
01/01/87(R)
12/01/86(R)
12/18/79(R)
02/15/78(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/77(R)
09/14/79(R)
03/19/90(R)
05/19/87(R)
10/28/77(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/10/84(R)
12/01/77(R)
01/05/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/20/96
08/05/97
08/09/99
1 1/20/96
02/02/90
03/04/88
12/03/87
09/01/86(L)
1 1/20/96
04/15/77
12/19/96
07/04/89
05/21/01
06/20/01 >
1 1/20/96
01/21/83(M)
02/01/85(M)
07/17/89
03/19/90
1 1/20/96
04/02/90
11/20/96
09/15/83
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
10/06/00
03/01/87(L)
03/01/87(L)
10/13/78(M)
08/15/89
1 1/20/96
04/01/87(L)
01/01/87(L)
12/01/86(L)
12/18/79
02/15/78
10/04/95
09/28/79
04/15/81
10/04/95
03/19/90
05/19/87
(NSFHA)
02/15/84
09/10/84(M)
12/19/96
12/19/96
Page 52 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
421030#
42063 1#
421823#
420090#
421601#
421036#
420165#
420662#
420400B
422282#
42009 1#
42 1802 A
421878#
420244#
421124#
421927#
420734#
422046#
421409#
422208#
420942#
421125#
422235#
421225A
421215#
42249 1#
420663#
420157#
421707#
421330D
421355#
420963#
422403A
421578#
421532A
420337#
420664#
421919#
420374B
421425#
421472#
422492#
422306A
420516A
420632#
421045#
420943#
420180#
421126#
Community Name
WICONISCO, TOWNSHIP OF
WILKES-BARRE, CITY OF
WILKES-BARRE, TOWNSHIP OF
WILKINS, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIAMS, TOWNSHIP OF
WILLIAMSBURG, BOROUGH OF
WILLIAMSPORT, CITY OF
WILLIAMSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
WILLISTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
WILMERDING, BOROUGH OF
WILMINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WILMINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
WILMORE, BOROUGH OF
WILMOT, TOWNSHIP OF
WILSON, BOROUGH OF
WIND GAP, BOROUGH OF
WINDBER, CITY OF
WINDHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
WINDHAM, TOWNSHIP OF
WINDSOR, BOROUGH OF
WINDSOR, TOWNSHIP OF
WINDSOR, TOWNSHIP OF
WINFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF
WINSLOW, TOWNSHIP OF
WOLF CREEK, TOWNSHIP OF
WOLF, TOWNSHIP OF
WOMELSDORF,BOROUGH OF
WOOD, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODBURY, BOROUGH OF
WOODBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODBURY, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODCOCK, BOROUGH OF
WOODCOCK, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODWARD, CITY OF
WOODWARD, TOWNSHIP OF
WOODWARD, TOWNSHIP OF
WORCESTER, TOWNSHIP OF
WORMLEYSBURG, BOROUGH OF
WORTH, TOWNSHIP OF
WORTH, TOWNSHIP OF
WORTH, TOWNSHIP OF
WORTHINGTON, BOROUGH OF
WORTHVILLE, CITY OF
WRIGHT, TOWNSHIP OF
WRIGHTSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF
WRIGHTSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
WYALUSING, BOROUGH OF
WYALUSING, TOWNSHIP OF
County
DAUPHIN COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
DAUPHIN COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CAMBRIA COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SOMERSET COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
HUNTINGDON
COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CLEARFIELD
COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
CENTRE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
12/02/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/14/79(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/01/77(R)
08/05/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/01/79(R)
06/01/86(R)
02/04/83(R)
12/05/90(R)
07/16/90(R)
01/16/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/17/86(R)
07/03/90(R)
09/04/87(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
12/16/80(R)
06/01/83(R)
05/01/86(R)
07/03/90(R)
06/25/82(R)
12/02/80(R)
10/15/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
05/15/80(R)
01/17/85(R)
06/18/90(R)
04/01/86(R)
01/16/80(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
02/16/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/15/89(R)
02/04/83(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/15/78(R)
12/18/79(R)
07/16/90(R)
07/16/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/15/81
03/16/92
12/02/80(M)
10/04/95
10/15/85(M)
04/06/01
03/01/78
12/01/77
08/05/85(M)
11/20/96
10/04/95
06/01/86(L)
02/04/83(M)
12/05/90
07/16/90
04/06/01
04/06/01
10/17/86
07/03/90
09/04/87
1 1/03/82
05/21/01
06/01/83
05/01/86(L)
02/18/98
06/25/82(M)
12/02/80
05/21/01
11/01/85(M)
09/24/84(M)
08/24/84(M)
05/15/80
01/17/85(M)
06/18/90
04/01/86(L)
09/17/97
04/03/81
12/19/96
02/16/77
09/01/86(L)
08/15/89
02/04/83(M)
05/01/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
01/16/81
06/20/01 >
09/22/99
07/16/90
07/16/90
Page 53 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
420633D
422237#
421375#
420977#
4202 10#
420634
420442#
420944#
420946#
421239#
420945#
421032#
42 1726 A
421737
420844#
420908#
420226#
421947#
Community Name
WYOMING, BOROUGH OF
WYOMISSING HILLS, BOROUGH OF
WYOMISSING, BOROUGH OF
WYSOX, TOWNSHIP OF
YARDLEY, BOROUGH OF
YATESVILLE, BOROUGH OF
YEADON, BOROUGH OF
YOE, BOROUGH OF
YORK HAVEN, BOROUGH OF
YORK SPRINGS, BOROUGH OF
YORK, CITY OF
YORK, TOWNSHIP OF
YOUNG, TOWNSHIP OF
YOUNG, TOWNSHIP OF
YOUNGSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
YOUNGWOOD, BOROUGH OF
ZELIENOPLE, BOROUGH OF
ZERBE, TOWNSHIP OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
LUZERNE COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
BRADFORD COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
LUZERNE COUNTY
DELAWARE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
INDIANA COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
BUTLER COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
COUNT
2451
2448
65
711
3
2
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/16/77(R)
06/22/84(R)
04/18/83(R)
02/01/78(R)
08/01/77(R)
07/31/78(R)
11/01/79(R)
12/01/82(R)
12/18/79(R)
06/01/79(R)
06/15/77(R)
05/17/89(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/01/86(R)
08/15/90(R)
12/15/81(R)
06/17/86(R)
01/17/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/81
(NSFHA)
05/21/01
02/01/78
06/20/01 >
(NSFHA)
09/30/93
12/01/82
12/18/79
02/19/97
06/15/77
05/17/89
08/01/86(L)
04/01/86(L)
08/15/90
08/05/97
06/17/86
01/17/90
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 54 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
Community Name
"PENNSYLVANIA
420006# AVALON, BOROUGH OF
422757# BERKS COUNTY*
422404B COOKE, TOWNSHIP OF
421963# DELAWARE, TOWNSHIP OF
422286# ELK, TOWNSHIP OF
422096# ELKLAND, TOWNSHIP OF OF
421866# FINDLEY, TOWNSHIP OF
422289# HIGHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
421922A LIMESTONE, TOWNSHIP OF
421881 # MENNO, TOWNSHIP OF
42005 8# NORTH BRADDOCK, BOROUGH OF
422665# PENNSBURY VILLAGE, BOROUGH OF
420066# PORT VUE, BOROUGH OF
420826# ROSEVILLE, BOROUGH OF
422339 TELFORD, BOROUGH OF
422681# TRUMBAUERSVILLE, BOROUGH OF
422584# UNIONDALE, BOROUGH OF
420355# VENANGO,BOROUGH OF
422691# WEST GROVE, BOROUGH OF
420086# WEST VIEW, BOROUGH OF
420907# YOUNGSTOWN, BOROUGH OF
County
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BERKS COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PIKE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
MIFFLIN COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
TIOGA COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BUCKS COUNTY
SUSQUEHANNA
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
ALLEGHENY COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
12/15/78(F)
12/05/97(F)
01/28/77
12/04/85(F)
07/30/82(F)
04/01/86(F)
02/04/83(F)
04/08/83(F)
06/01/87(F)
06/01/87(F)
02/16/79(F)
10/04/95(F)
09/28/79(F)
08/01/87(F)
05/18/99(F)
05/18/99(F)
02/04/83(F)
06/18/90(F)
1 1/20/96(F)
06/30/76(F)
04/20/79(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
10/04/95(8)
12/05/98
01/28/78
01/19/01(8)
1 1/20/96(8)
11/02/90(8)
09/02/93(8)
1 1/20/96(8)
06/01/87(8)
11/17/93(8)
10/04/95(8)
10/04/96
10/04/95(8)
07/05/93(8)
05/18/00
05/18/00
07/05/93(8)
06/18/90(8)
1 1/20/97
10/04/95(8)
08/05/97(8)
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 15
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 16
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 16
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 55 of 55
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID Community Name County
"PUERTO RICO
720100 BAYAMON, MUNICIPALITY OF
USE THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
[720000] FIRM
720101 PONCE, MUNCIPALITY OF PONCE COUNTY
USE PUERTO RICO FIRM (720000) DATED 6-2-99,
PANELS 160, 217, 218, 219, 221,
222,223,224,276,277,281,282, and 284.
720000# PUERTO RICO,COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 3
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 3
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 0
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 0
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 0
IDENTIFIED
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
BAY AMON COUNTY 08/01/78(R)
09/24/99(R)
08/01/78(R) 06/02/99
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
"RHODE ISLAND
445392# BARRINGTON, TOWN OF
445393# BRISTOL, TOWN OF
440013# BURRILLVILLE, TOWN OF
445394# CENTRAL FALLS, CITY OF
445395# CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF
440004# COVENTRY, TOWN OF
445396# CRANSTON, CITY OF
4400 16# CUMBERLAND, TOWN OF
445397# EAST GREENWICH, TOWN OF
445398# EAST PROVIDENCE, CITY OF
440032# EXETER, TOWN OF
440033B FOSTER, TOWN OF
440034# GLOCESTER, TOWN OF
440028# HOPKINTON, TOWN OF
445399# JAMESTOWN, CITY OF
440018# JOHNSTON, TOWN OF
445400# LINCOLN, TOWN OF
440035# LITTLE COMPTON, TOWN OF
445401# MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
445402# NARRAGANSETT, TOWN OF
440036# NEW SHOREHAM, TOWN OF
445403# NEWPORT, CITY OF
445404# NORTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF
440020# NORTH PROVIDENCE, TOWN OF
440021# NORTH SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
440022# PAWTUCKET, CITY OF
445405# PORTSMOUTH, TOWN OF
445406# PROVIDENCE, CITY OF
44003 1 # RICHMOND, TOWN OF
440024# SCITUATE, TOWN OF
440025# SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
BRISTOL COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/16/71(R)
12/01/72(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/28/71(R)
07/13/72(R)
09/01/78(R)
08/27/71(R)
12/16/80(R)
02/09/73(R)
05/18/73(R)
03/01/82(R)
12/04/85(R)
08/15/79(R)
03/16/81(R)
04/21/72(R)
09/01/78(R)
11/30/73(R)
08/17/81(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
1 2/03/7 1(R)
04/03/85(R)
12/04/70(R)
07/14/72(R)
12/15/77(R)
08/01/78(R)
07/16/71(R)
08/24/73(R)
12/11/70(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
03/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/05/96
03/05/96
07/02/79
01/06/82
09/30/95
05/21/01
11/01/84
06/16/92
02/16/83
06/01/83
03/01/82
12/04/85(M)
03/03/92
03/16/81
06/16/92
11/17/93
08/02/82
06/16/92
06/16/92
09/30/95
09/30/95
06/16/92
06/16/92
12/06/99
12/03/93
01/03/86
07/20/98
06/06/00
1 1/05/80
01/02/81
03/04/91
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
445407#
4400 12#
445408#
445409#
440037A
440007#
445410#
44541 1#
Community Name
SOUTH KINGSTOWN, TOWN OF
TIVERTON, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WARWICK, CITY OF
WEST GREENWICH, TOWN OF
WEST WARWICK, TOWN OF
WESTERLY, CITY OF
WOONSOCKET, CITY OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
NEWPORT COUNTY
BRISTOL COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PROVIDENCE
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/23/72(R)
05/02/77(R)
07/28/72(R)
04/06/73(R)
01/03/86(R)
02/01/78(R)
07/28/72(R)
10/01/71(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/30/95
09/30/95
03/05/96
06/16/92
01/03/86(M)
04/15/86
05/17/93
01/06/82
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 39
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 39
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 0
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 2
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 0
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 2 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
450001#
450002#
450003#
450201#
450013#
450014#
450086
450171#
450222#
450262#
450105#
450203#
450259#
450204#
450023#
450130#
450025#
450026#
450015#
450147#
450029#
450127A
450024B
45025 1#
450232#
450096B
450004#
450117#
450032A
450216A
450131#
450236#
455413#
455412#
450050#
450045#
450047#
450048#
450228#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"SOUTH CAROLINA
ABBEVILLE, CITY OF
AIKEN COUNTY*
AIKEN, CITY OF
ALLENDALE COUNTY*
ANDERSON COUNTY *
ANDERSON, CITY OF
ANDREWS, TOWN OF
ARCADIA LAKES, TOWN OF
ATLANTIC BEACH, TOWN OF
AWENDAW, TOWN OF
USE THE CHARLESTON COUNTY [455413] FIRM
AYNOR, TOWN OF
BAMBERG COUNTY*
BAMBERG, CITY OF
BARNWELL COUNTY *
BARNWELL, CITY OF
BATESBURG-LEESVILLE, TOWN OF
BEAUFORT COUNTY*
BEAUFORT, CITY OF
BELTON, CITY OF
BENNETTSVILLE, CITY OF
BERKELEY COUNTY *
BISHOPVILLE, TOWN OF
BLACKVILLE, CITY OF
BLUFFTON, TOWN OF
BRIARCLIFF ACRES, TOWN OF
BRUNSON, TOWN OF
BURNETTOWN, TOWN OF
CAMDEN, CITY OF
CAMERON, TOWN OF
CAMPOBELLO, TOWN OF
CAYCE, CITY OF
CHAPIN, TOWN OF
CHARLESTON COUNTY*
DOES NOT INCLUDE THE TOWN OF AWENDAW
[450262]
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHERAW, TOWN OF
CHEROKEE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY *
CHESTER, CITY OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY*
in the National Flood Program
County
ABBEVILLE COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
ALLENDALE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
GEORGETOWN
COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
BAMBERG COUNTY
BAMBERG COUNTY
BARNWELL COUNTY
BARNWELL COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
SALUDA COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
MARLBORO COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
BARNWELL COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
KERSHAW COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/04/80(R)
03/04/80(R)
04/16/79(R)
06/17/86(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/30/76(R)
11/19/80(R)
05/15/78(R)
06/28/93(R)
01/26/83(R)
02/20/92(R)
1 1/20/96(R)
12/19/00(R)
03/02/89(R)
06/10/77(R)
09/30/77(R)
05/02/77(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/19/87(R)
09/30/83(R)
07/01/88(R)
05/15/86(R)
08/24/93(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/04/87(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
09/01/93(R)
ll/24/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/12/00(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
10/21/81(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/05/82(R)
1 1/06/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/04/80
11/02/94
04/16/79
06/17/86(M)
07/02/81
05/15/84
01/19/94
08/23/99
(NSFHA)
03/18/91
1 1/20/96
04/02/92
07/02/92
02/09/00
11/04/92
09/29/86
05/01/80
08/19/87
05/06/96
07/01/88(L)
05/15/86(M)
12/18/86
08/23/99
08/05/86(M)
02/04/87
12/06/00
09/01/93(L)
ll/24/78(M)
02/09/00
09/02/93
1 1/04/92
09/10/82
07/02/81
07/05/82
07/05/82
11/06/91
Page 1 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
45005 1#
450238#
450123B
450194#
450056#
450172#
450106#
450060#
450061B
450021B
450065B
450068#
450177B
450167#
450173#
450229#
450074A
455414#
450118#
450097B
450010A
450075#
450076#
450078#
455415#
450174#
450195#
450209B
450098B
450046#
450085#
450087#
450132#
450206#
450049A
450188A
450089#
450091#
450094#
Community Name
CLARENDON COUNTY *
CLEMSON, CITY OF
CLINTON, CITY OF
CLOVER, TOWN OF
COLLETON COUNTY*
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
CONWAY, TOWN OF
DARLINGTON COUNTY *
DARLINGTON, CITY OF
DENMARK, TOWN OF
DILLON, TOWN OF
DORCHESTER COUNTY *
DUNCAN, TOWN OF
EASLEY, CITY OF
EASTOVER, TOWN OF
EDGEFIELD COUNTY *
EDGEFIELD, TOWN OF
EDISTO BEACH,TOWN OF
ELGIN, TOWN OF
ESTILL, TOWN OF
FAIRFAX, TOWN OF
FAIRFIELD COUNTY *
FLORENCE COUNTY *
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FOLLY BEACH, CITY OF
FOREST ACRES, CITY OF
FORT MILL, TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN INN, TOWN OF
FURMAN, TOWN OF
GAFFNEY, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE WACCAMAW NECK FLOOD DISTRICT
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GILBERT, TOWN OF
GOOSE CREEK, CITY OF
GREAT FALLS, TOWN OF
GREELEYVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENVILLE COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF CITY VIEW
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREENWOOD COUNTY*
County
CLARENDON
COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
COLLETON COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
DARLINGTON
COUNTY
DARLINGTON
COUNTY
BAMBERG COUNTY
DILLON COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
EDGEFIELD COUNTY
EDGEFIELD COUNTY
COLLETON COUNTY
KERSHAW COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
ALLENDALE COUNTY
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
GEORGETOWN
COUNTY
GEORGETOWN
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/03/9 1(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/17/77(R)
05/15/80(R)
04/17/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/25/76(R)
07/01/91(R)
01/06/82(R)
05/27/77(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/01/93(R)
08/14/95
04/09/7 1(R)
12/06/00(R)
07/17/86(R)
07/19/95
07/19/82(R)
09/02/82(R)
12/01/81(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
06/18/80(R)
06/17/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/03/81(R)
03/01/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
10/13/95(R)
02/17/82(R)
06/25/76(R)
06/25/76(R)
12/02/80(R)
02/01/80(R)
03/18/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/03/91
03/02/93
06/17/77(M)
05/15/80
10/16/92
02/09/00
08/23/99
06/03/91
07/01/91(L)
06/25/76(M)
07/01/91(L)
04/15/94
05/27/77(M)
07/19/82
01/19/94
09/20/95
03/05/76
10/16/92
(NSFHA)
07/17/86(M)
04/23/76
07/19/82
09/02/82
12/01/81
11/17/93
01/19/94
06/18/80
06/17/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
08/03/81
12/20/00
03/16/89
02/09/00
02/17/82
06/25/76(M)
06/25/76(M)
01/16/92
01/16/92
10/17/89
Page 2 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
450093#
450200#
450095#
450100#
450030#
450113#
450070B
450062A
450189B
450250#
450163#
450037#
450016#
450104#
450217A
450133#
455416#
450017B
450005B
450112#
450208A
450115#
450119
450257
450190A
450079#
450066#
450063
450120#
450121#
450215#
450191C
450067B
450122#
450125#
450126#
450129#
450134#
450168A
Community Name
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GREEK, CITY OF
HAMPTON COUNTY*
HAMPTON, TOWN OF
HANAHAN, CITY OF
HARDEEVILLE, TOWN OF
HARLEYVILLE, TOWN OF
HARTSVILLE, CITY OF
HEMINGWAY, TOWN OF
HILTON HEAD ISLAND, TOWN OF
HOLLY HILL, TOWN OF
HOLLYWOOD, TOWN OF
HONEA PATH, TOWN OF
HORRY COUNTY *
INCLUDES GRAND STRAND FLOOD DISTRICT
INMAN, TOWN OF
IRMO, TOWN OF
ISLE OF PALMS, CITY OF
IV A, TOWN OF
JACKSON, CITY OF
JASPER COUNTY*
JOHNSONVILLE, CITY OF
KERSHAW COUNTY *
KERSHAW, TOWN OF
KIAWAH ISLAND, TOWN OF
USE THE CHARLESTON COUNTY [455413] FIRM
KINGSTREE, TOWN OF
LAKE CITY, CITY OF
LAKE VIEW, TOWN OF
LAMAR, TOWN OF
LANCASTER COUNTY *
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LANDRUM, TOWN OF
LANE, TOWN OF
LATTA, TOWN OF
LAURENS COUNTY *
LAURENS, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY *
LEXINGTON, TOWN OF
LIBERTY, TOWN OF
County
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
DARLINGTON
COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
ABBEVILLE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
KERSHAW COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
DILLON COUNTY
DARLINGTON
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
DILLON COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/04/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
01/15/88(R)
05/17/88(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
10/26/79(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/02/86(R)
09/12/84(R)
07/02/80(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/04/80(R)
02/15/84(R)
1 l/24/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/29/86(R)
06/25/76(R)
1 1/02/83(R)
09/30/76(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/01/81(R)
03/02/89(R)
06/16/95
01/06/83(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
12/15/90(R)
11/02/83(R)
12/15/90(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/25/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/04/87
09/28/79
01/15/88
05/17/88
06/15/81
09/01/87(L)
10/26/79(M)
09/01/87(L)
04/02/86(M)
09/29/86
07/02/80
12/20/99
03/04/80
08/23/99
1 l/24/78(M)
02/09/00
03/18/91
06/17/86(M)
05/15/86(M)
10/16/92
06/25/76(M)
12/06/00
(NSFHA)
09/01/87(L)
06/01/81
03/02/89
07/18/75
01/06/83
07/05/82
07/16/81
08/05/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
12/15/90
11/02/83
12/15/90
02/09/00
02/09/00
06/25/76(M)
Page 3 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
450241B
450108#
450219B
450128A
450052B
450141#
450142#
450146#
450198#
450039#
450226#
450152B
450040#
45003 1#
455417#
450143#
450109#
450006A
450224#
450153#
450144#
450244#
450007#
450042#
450110#
450213A
450157#
450160#
450164#
450180C
450081A
450255#
450135#
450019#
450166#
450169A
450136#
450028#
450082B
450043#
450170#
450114#
Community Name
LOCKHART TOWNSHIP OF
LORIS, TOWN OF
LYMAN, TOWN OF
LYNCHBURG, TOWN OF
MANNING, TOWN OF
MARION COUNTY
MARION,CITY OF
MARLBORO COUNTY
MAULDIN, CITY OF
MCCLELLANVILLE, TOWN OF
MCCORMICK COUNTY *
MCCORMICK, TOWN OF
MEGGETT, TOWN OF
MONCKS CORNER, TOWN OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, TOWN OF
MULLINS, CITY OF
MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF
NEW ELLENTON, CITY OF
NEWBERRY COUNTY*
NEWBERRY, CITY OF
NICHOLS,TOWN OF
NINETY SIX, TOWN OF
NORTH AUGUSTA, CITY OF
NORTH CHARLESTON, CITY OF
NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, TOWN OF
NORWAY, TOWN OF
OCONEE COUNTY *
ORANGEBURG COUNTY *
ORANGEBURG, CITY OF
PACOLET MILLS, TOWN OF
PAMPLICO, TOWN OF
PAWLEYS ISLAND, TOWN OF
PELION, TOWN OF
PENDLETON, TOWN OF
PICKENS COUNTY *
PICKENS, TOWN OF
PINE RIDGE, TOWN OF
PORT ROYAL, CITY OF
QUINBY, TOWN OF
RAVENEL, TOWN OF
RICHLAND COUNTY*
RIDGELAND, TOWN OF
County
UNION COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
CLARENDON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARLBORO COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
MCCORMICK
COUNTY
MCCORMICK
COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
NEWBERRY COUNTY
NEWBERRY COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
AIKEN COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
GEORGETOWN
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
PICKENS COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/01/91(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/27/77(R)
02/01/91(R)
04/15/86(R)
06/18/90(R)
05/04/87(R)
08/11/97(R)
09/29/78(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/01/89(R)
06/25/76(R)
05/11/79(R)
01/16/81(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/05/77(R)
06/30/76(R)
12/15/90(R)
06/04/80(R)
09/15/99(R)
09/17/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
10/08/76(R)
10/14/77(R)
05/27/77(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/16/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
1 l/24/78(R)
10/23/95
03/01/84(R)
07/17/95(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
06/25/76(R)
03/18/80(R)
04/15/77(R)
ll/24/78(R)
04/01/81(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
08/19/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/01/91(L)
08/23/99
05/27/77(M)
02/01/91(L)
04/15/86(M)
06/18/90
05/04/87
11/06/91
09/03/92
04/17/87
09/20/95
06/25/76(M)
10/17/86
01/16/81
10/17/86
02/04/98
08/23/99
06/30/76(M)
12/15/90
06/04/80
08/04/87
09/04/86(M)
08/16/94
11/05/86
08/23/99
05/27/77(M)
09/01/87(L)
12/16/80
07/16/80
1 l/24/78(M)
04/23/76
03/16/89
02/09/00
05/15/80
07/19/82
06/25/76(M)
02/09/00
09/29/86
ll/24/78(M)
12/20/99
01/17/97
08/19/86(M)
Page 4 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
450196#
450249
450230#
450175#
450101A
450083B
450256
450145B
450158#
450092#
450137#
450176#
450181#
450138#
450192A
455418#
450054B
450073#
450182#
450184#
450111#
450139#
45001 1#
450264
450012C
450186#
450102B
450159B
450058#
450248#
450140#
450223
450156B
450059A
450187#
450020#
Community Name
ROCK HILL, CITY OF
ROCKVILLE, TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF ROCKVILLE HAS ADOPTED THE
CHARLESTON COUNTY FIRM DATED 11/4/92 PANEL
0435G.
SALUDA COUNTY*
SALUDA, TOWN OF
SCOTIA, TOWN OF
SCRANTON, TOWN OF
SEABROOK ISLAND, TOWN OF
USE THE CHARLESTON COUNTY [455413] FIRM
SELLERS, TOWN OF
SENECA, CITY OF
SIMPSONVILLE, CITY OF
SOUTH CONGAREE, TOWN OF
SPARTANBURG COUNTY *
SPARTANBURG, CITY OF
SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF
STUCKEY, TOWN OF
SULLIVANS ISLAND, TOWN OF
SUMMERTON, TOWN OF
SUMMERVILLE, TOWN OF
SUMTER COUNTY *
SUMTER, CITY OF
SURFSIDE BEACH, TOWN OF
SWANSEA, TOWN OF
SYCAMORE, TOWN OF
TRAVELERS REST, CITY OF
THE CITY OF TRAVELERS REST HAS ADOPTED THE
GREENVILLE COUNTY [450089] FIRM DATED 1-16-97
PANEL 135.
ULMER, TOWN OF
UNION, CITY OF
VARNVILLE, TOWN OF
WALHALLA, TOWN OF
WALTERBORO,CITY OF
WARE SHOALS, TOWN OF
WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF
WESTMINSTER, TOWN OF
WHITMIRE, TOWN OF
WILLIAMS, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY *
WILLIAMSTON, TOWN OF
County
YORK COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
SALUDA COUNTY
SALUDA COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
CLARENDON
COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
HORRY COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
ALLENDALE COUNTY
GREENVILLE
COUNTY
ALLENDALE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
COLLETON COUNTY
ABBEVILLE COUNTY
GREENWOOD
COUNTY
LAURENS COUNTY
LEXINGTON COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
NEWBERRY COUNTY
COLLETON COUNTY
WILLIAMSBURG
COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/01/81(R)
03/09/98(R)
07/30/99
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
04/26/95
12/16/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/01/84(R)
06/01/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/02/7 1(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
01/05/89(R)
03/01/78(R)
12/17/76(R)
06/10/77(R)
06/27/00
04/03/97(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/16/81(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/17/87(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/15/79(R)
07/31/79(R)
02/01/91(R)
07/17/86(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
03/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/03/93
01/20/78
07/03/86(M)
07/17/86(M)
09/01/78(M)
05/02/80
12/19/80(M)
09/29/78
02/09/00
08/01/84
05/16/80
02/09/00
09/01/86(L)
03/18/91
06/03/86(M)
12/04/85
08/23/99
12/18/81
08/23/99
02/09/00
08/11/78
06/03/86(M)
07/16/81
07/03/86(M)
06/17/86(M)
04/17/87
08/19/86
02/09/00
(NSFHA)
02/01/91(L)
07/17/86(M)
02/06/91
03/04/80
Page 5 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name
450214# WOODRUFF, TOWN OF
450103A YEM AS SEE, TOWN OF
450193# YORK COUNTY*
450197# YORK, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
SPARTANBURG
COUNTY
BEAUFORT COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
199
192
4
54
7
7
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
1 l/24/78(R) 1 l/24/78(M)
09/01/86(R)
11/04/81(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/01/86(L)
02/03/93
05/03/82
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
450227#
450116#
450148A
450161#
450162#
450237#
450064#
450022A
450099A
450242A
450225
450080A
450018
450183B
450218
450165A
450212
450155#
450057A
450246#
450072
450185#
Community Name
"SOUTH CAROLINA
ABBEVILLE COUNTY *
BETHUNE, TOWN OF
BLENHEIM, TOWN OF
BOWMAN, TOWN OF
BRANCHVILLE, TOWN OF
CHESTERFIELD, TOWN OF
DILLON COUNTY
EHRHARDT, TOWN OF
GIFFORD, TOWN OF
LURAY, TOWN OF
MAYESVILLE, TOWN OF
OLANTA, TOWN OF
PELZER, TOWN OF
PINEWOOD, TOWN OF
REEVESVILLE, TOWN OF
ROWESVILLE, TOWN OF
SALEM, TOWN OF
SILVERSTREET, TOWN OF
SMOAKS, TOWN OF
SOCIETY HILL, TOWN OF
ST. GEORGE, TOWN OF
UNION COUNTY*
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
ABBEVILLE COUNTY
KERSHAW COUNTY
MARLBORO COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
DILLON COUNTY
BAMBERG COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
HAMPTON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
SUMTER COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
ORANGEBURG
COUNTY
OCONEE COUNTY
NEWBERRY COUNTY
COLLETON COUNTY
DARLINGTON
COUNTY
DORCHESTER
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
0
5
0
Hazard Area
Identified
02/10/78
12/06/00(F)
08/12/77
07/16/80(F)
02/01/80(F)
09/22/78(F)
07/16/91(F)
07/19/74
07/03/86(F)
09/15/78
03/19/76
05/24/74
06/18/76
07/17/86(F)
12/27/74
09/02/74
11/08/74
01/24/75
09/06/74
10/13/78
07/23/76
03/1 8/9 1(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
02/10/79
07/18/76
08/12/78
02/04/88(8)
02/04/88(8)
09/22/79
12/09/78
07/19/75
07/03/86(8)
09/15/79
03/19/77
05/24/75
06/18/77
07/17/86(8)
12/27/75
09/02/75
11/08/75
01/24/76
09/06/75
10/13/79
07/23/77
03/18/91(8)
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 22
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 22
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
460007#
460096
460234A
461207
460097
460154
460058#
46025 1#
4600 12#
460156
460039#
460252
460089#
460296#
460101
460159
460253#
460004#
460006#
460005#
460284
460255
460161
460236#
460256
460162
460102
460047#
460035B
461212
460163
460164
460104
460257#
461209
461203
460258
460013
460259#
460260#
460106
460084A
460166
460008#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"SOUTH DAKOTA
ABERDEEN, CITY OF
ALPENA, CITY OF
ARMOUR, CITY OF
ART AS, CITY OF
ARTESIAN, TOWN OF
AVON, CITY OF
BALTIC, TOWN OF
BEADLE COUNTY *
BELLE FOURCHE, CITY OF
BIG STONE CITY, CITY OF
BLUNT, TOWN OF
BON HOMME COUNTY *
BOX ELDER, CITY OF
BRANDON,CITY OF
BRISTOL, CITY OF
BRITTON, CITY OF
BROOKINGS COUNTY*
BROOKINGS, CITY OF
BROWN COUNTY *
BRUCE, TOWN OF
BRULE COUNTY *
BUFFALO COUNTY *
BURKE, CITY OF
BUTTE COUNTY*
CAMPBELL COUNTY *
CANISTOTA,CITY OF
CANOVA, CITY OF
CANTON, CITY OF
CASTLEWOOD, CITY OF
CAVOUR, TOWN OF
CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
CHAMBERLAIN, CITY OF
CHANCELLOR, TOWN OF
CHARLES MIX COUNTY *
CHELSEA, TOWN OF
CHEYENNE RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION DEWEY
CLARK COUNTY *
CLARK, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY*
CODINGTON COUNTY*
COLMAN, CITY OF
COLOME, CITY OF
COLTON, CITY OF
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
BROWN COUNTY
JERAULD COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
SANBORN COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
BEADLE COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
DAY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
BROOKINGS COUNTY
BROOKINGS COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
BROOKINGS COUNTY
BRULE COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
GREGORY COUNTY
BUTTE COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
MCCOOK COUNTY
MINER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HAMLIN COUNTY
BEADLE COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
BRULE COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
CHARLES MIX
COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
ZIEBACH COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
CODINGTON COUNTY
MOODY COUNTY
TRIPP COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/78(R)
06/08/98(R)
10/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
02/11/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
11/19/80(R)
10/01/97(R)
06/01/77(R)
07/01/98(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/08/98(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/10/79(R)
04/25/97(R)
06/08/98(R)
01/01/87(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
02/05/80(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
11/24/98
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
04/25/97(R)
09/04/85(R)
04/15/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/15/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/01/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/01/98(R)
04/01/87(R)
02/01/86(R)
02/11/85(R)
05/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/07/94(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
11/19/80
10/01/97(L)
01/19/82
07/01/98(L)
05/15/80
(NSFHA)
05/15/80
07/10/79(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/01/87(L)
10/17/78
08/15/90
02/05/80(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/20/77
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
04/15/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
04/01/87
02/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
05/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
08/15/90
Page 1 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
460071 A
460237
460107
4600 18#
4600 19#
460108
460086#
460020A
460261
460168
460045#
460059#
460025B
460262
460023
460079
460169
460170
460026#
460264
460172
460036#
460111
460 173 A
460265
460175B
460062#
465419#
460009#
460177
460112
460299
460266#
460267
460178
461201
460179#
460268
460034#
460269
460270#
460114
460180
460294
460181
460182
460116#
460117
460027
460183#
460049#
Community Name
CORONA, TOWN OF
CORSON COUNTY*
CRESBARD, TOWN OF
CUSTER COUNTY*
CUSTER, CITY OF
DALLAS, TOWN OF
DAVIS, TOWN OF
DAVISON COUNTY*
DAY COUNTY *
DE SMET, CITY OF
DEAD WOOD, CITY OF
DELL RAPIDS, CITY OF
DELMONT, TOWN OF
DEUEL COUNTY *
DEWEY COUNTY*
DOLAND, TOWN OF
DUPREE, CITY OF
EAGLE BUTTE, TOWN OF
EDGEMONT, CITY OF
EDMUNDS COUNTY *
ELKTON, CITY OF
ESTELLINE, CITY OF
ETHAN, CITY OF
EUREKA, CITY OF
FAULK COUNTY *
FAULKTON, CITY OF
FLANDREAU, CITY OF
FORT PIERRE, CITY OF
FREDERICK, TOWN OF
GARRETSON, CITY OF
GARY, TOWN OF
GETTYSBURG, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY*
GREGORY COUNTY *
GREGORY, CITY OF
GRENVILLE, TOWN OF
GROTON, CITY OF
HAAKON COUNTY *
HAMLIN COUNTY*
HAND COUNTY *
HANSON COUNTY *
HARRISBURG, TOWN OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HECLA, CITY OF
HERREID, CITY OF
HIGHMORE, CITY OF
HILL CITY, TOWN OF
HOSMER, CITY OF
HOT SPRINGS, CITY OF
HOWARD, CITY OF
HUDSON, TOWN OF
County
ROBERTS COUNTY
CORSON COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
GREGORY COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
DAVISON COUNTY
DAY COUNTY
KINGSBURY COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DEUEL COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
SPINK COUNTY
ZIEBACH COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
FALL RIVER COUNTY
EDMUNDS COUNTY
BROOKINGS COUNTY
HAMLIN COUNTY
DAVISON COUNTY
MCPHERSON
COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
MOODY COUNTY
STANLEY COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
DEUEL COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
GREGORY COUNTY
GREGORY COUNTY
DAY COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
HAAKON COUNTY
HAMLIN COUNTY
HAND COUNTY
HANSON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
HYDE COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
EDMUNDS COUNTY
FALL RIVER COUNTY
MINER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/04/87(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/01/98(R)
09/29/86(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
03/18/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
04/01/87(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
02/03/82(R)
08/15/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
11/12/85(R)
07/01/98(R)
07/01/98(R)
12/16/80(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
01/22/80(R)
03/08/89(R)
10/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
01/12/73(R)
03/01/78(R)
01/30/84(R)
07/01/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
02/01/87(R)
06/08/98(R)
12/09/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
03/01/78(R)
06/08/98(R)
05/15/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/01/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
09/03/86(R)
07/01/98(R)
01/30/84(R)
11/18/81(R)
04/25/97(R)
06/30/76(R)
08/19/85(R)
12/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/04/87
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
03/02/98
03/02/98
(NSFHA)
03/18/86(M)
04/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
05/07/01
08/15/80
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
07/01/98(L)
12/16/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/22/80(M)
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
04/01/82
02/16/94
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
02/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
05/15/86(M)
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
11/18/81
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
12/18/85(M)
Page 2 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
46027 1#
460118
460003#
46004 1#
460272
460184#
460121#
460122
460240
460273
460050A
46023 1#
460275#
460187
460276#
460189
460125
460094#
460190
460068
460192
460277#
460278
460044#
460197
460279
460280
460195
460054#
460199#
460032B
460200
46020 1#
460283
460057#
46009 1#
460202A
46002 1#
461210
460052#
460235B
460022
460092#
460087#
460129
460210
461202
460211
Community Name
HUGHES COUNTY *
HUMBOLDT, TOWN OF
HURON, CITY OF
HUTCHINSON COUNTY*
HYDE COUNTY *
IPSWICH, CITY OF
IROQUOIS, CITY OF
ISABEL, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY*
JERAULD COUNTY*
KENNEBEC, TOWN OF
KEYSTONE, TOWN OF
KINGSBURY COUNTY*
LAKE ANDES, CITY OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAKE PRESTON, CITY OF
LANGFORD, TOWN OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LEAD, CITY OF
LEBANON, TOWN OF
LENNOX, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LYMAN COUNTY *
MADISON, CITY OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MCCOOK COUNTY *
MCINTOSH, CITY OF
MEADE COUNTY *
MENNO, CITY OF
MIDLAND, CITY OF
MILBANK, CITY OF
MILLER, CITY OF
MINER COUNTY *
MINNEHAHA COUNTY *
MISSION HILL, TOWN OF
MISSION, CITY OF
MITCHELL, CITY OF
MONROE, TOWN OF
MONTROSE, CITY OF
MOODY COUNTY *
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
NEW UNDERWOOD, TOWN OF
NORTH SIOUX CITY, CITY OF
OLDHAM, TOWN OF
ONIDA, CITY OF
ORIENT, TOWN OF
PARKER, CITY OF
County
HUGHES COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
BEADLE COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
HYDE COUNTY
EDMUNDS COUNTY
BEADLE COUNTY
KINGSBURY COUNTY
DEWEY COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
JERAULD COUNTY
LYMAN COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
KINGSBURY COUNTY
CHARLES MIX
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
KINGSBURY COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LYMAN COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
MCCOOK COUNTY
CORSON COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
HAAKON COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
HAND COUNTY
MINER COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
YANKTON COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
DAVISON COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
MCCOOK COUNTY
MOODY COUNTY
DAVISON COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
KINGSBURY COUNTY
SULLY COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/16/87(R)
04/01/87(R)
06/08/98(R)
12/18/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/04/80(R)
09/18/87(R)
12/09/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/30/84(R)
04/25/97(R)
05/17/90(R)
09/20/99
07/15/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
10/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/05/82(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/01/78(R)
11/15/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
12/09/85(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
09/05/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/01/79(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/11/76(R)
05/15/80(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/08/98(R)
12/23/85(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
07/16/87(M)
04/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
12/18/85(M)
10/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
03/04/80
09/18/87
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/17/90
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
07/05/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/01/78
11/15/85(L)
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
10/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
09/05/79
06/18/80
08/05/86(M)
02/01/79
(NSFHA)
02/04/98
09/04/85(M)
(NSFHA)
02/16/83
02/23/01
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 3 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
460042#
460064#
460033B
460040#
46000 IB
460212
460132
460285
460297
465420#
461205
46008 1#
460031 A
460286#
460136
461211
460053A
460074#
460213
461206
460060#
460072A
460046#
460140
460076#
460216
460287
460055#
460288
460142
460143
460063#
460289
460290
461208
460220
460242D
46022 1#
460146A
460015
460291
460298
4600 16#
460226
460227
460043
Community Name
PARKSTON, CITY OF
PENNINGTON COUNTY *
PHILIP, CITY OF
PIERRE, CITY OF
PLANKINTON, CITY OF
PLATTE, CITY OF
POLLOCK, CITY OF
POTTER COUNTY *
PRESHO, CITY OF
RAPID CITY, CITY OF
RAYMOND, CITY OF
REDFIELD, TOWN OF
REVILLO, TOWN OF
ROBERTS COUNTY*
ROSCOE, TOWN OF
ROSHOLT, CITY OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SANBORN COUNTY *
SCOTLAND, CITY OF
SENECA, TOWN OF
SIOUX FALLS, CITY OF
SISSETON, CITY OF
SPEARFISH, CITY OF
SPENCER, TOWN OF
SPINK COUNTY *
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
STANLEY COUNTY *
STURGIS, CITY OF
SULLY COUNTY *
TABOR, TOWN OF
TEA, TOWN OF
TRENT, TOWN OF
TRIPP COUNTY *
TURNER COUNTY *
TWIN BROOKS, CITY OF
TYNDALL, CITY OF
UNION COUNTY*
VALLEY SPRINGS, CITY OF
VEBLEN, TOWN OF
VERMILLION, CITY OF
WALWORTH COUNTY *
WARNER, CITY OF
WATERTOWN, CITY OF
WAUBAY, CITY OF
WEBSTER, CITY OF
WESSINGTON SPRINGS, CITY OF
County
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
HAAKON COUNTY
HUGHES COUNTY
AURORA COUNTY
CHARLES MIX
COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
LYMAN COUNTY
PENNINGTON
COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
SPINK COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ROBERTS COUNTY
EDMUNDS COUNTY
ROBERTS COUNTY
MCCOOK COUNTY
SANBORN COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
FAULK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
ROBERTS COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MCCOOK COUNTY
SPINK COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
STANLEY COUNTY
MEADE COUNTY
SULLY COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MOODY COUNTY
TRIPP COUNTY
TURNER COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
BON HOMME
COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MINNEHAHA
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
CODINGTON COUNTY
DAY COUNTY
DAY COUNTY
JERAULD COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/15/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/01/87(R)
06/04/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
12/10/98
04/25/97(R)
09/14/73(R)
06/08/98(R)
11/15/85(R)
10/01/86(R)
10/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
05/01/86(R)
11/15/85(R)
01/30/84(R)
06/08/98(R)
01/17/79(R)
05/01/86(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/05/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/01/77(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
04/25/97(R)
06/04/80(R)
04/25/97(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
04/25/97(R)
02/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/01/86(R)
01/30/84(R)
06/08/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
07/04/89(R)
04/25/97(R)
04/25/97(R)
01/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/15/85(M)
05/20/96
03/01/87(L)
06/04/80
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/18/98
(NSFHA)
11/15/85(M)
10/01/86(L)
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
05/01/86(L)
11/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/28/82
05/01/86(L)
01/17/90
(NSFHA)
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
01/19/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
06/04/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/23/01
07/16/80
05/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/04/89
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
Page 4 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
46001 1#
460228
4600 14#
460303
460075#
460151
460088#
461204
460093#
460292
Community Name
WESTPORT, TOWN OF
WHITEWOOD, CITY OF
WILLOW LAKE, TOWN OF
WINNER, CITY OF
WOONSOCKET, CITY OF
WORTHING, TOWN OF
YANKTON COUNTY*
YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE
YANKTON, CITY OF
ZIEBACH COUNTY *
County
BROWN COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
TRIPP COUNTY
SANBORN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
YANKTON COUNTY
CHARLES MIX
COUNTY
YANKTON COUNTY
ZIEBACH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/86(R)
11/30/83(R)
07/01/98(R)
06/08/98(R)
11/15/85(R)
04/25/97(R)
10/01/86(R)
06/08/98(R)
08/15/80(R)
06/08/98(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/90
(NSFHA)
07/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
11/15/85(M)
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
08/15/80
(NSFHA)
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 199
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 196
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 96
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 5 5
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 3
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 1
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 5 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
"SOUTH DAKOTA
460305# BATESLAND, TOWN OF
460099 BISON, TOWN OF
460247 BUFFALO GAP, TOWN OF
460037 BUFFALO, TOWN OF
460061 # EGAN, TOWN OF
46023 8# FALL RIVER COUNTY
460230A HERMOSA, TOWN OF
460185 KADOKA, CITY OF
460214A SELBY, CITY OF
460138 ST. FRANCIS, TOWN OF
460139 ST. LAWRENCE, TOWN OF
461199# VERDON, TOWN OF
460147 WESSINGTON, TOWN OF
County
SHANNON COUNTY
PERKINS COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
HARDING COUNTY
MOODY COUNTY
FALL RIVER COUNTY
CUSTER COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
TODD COUNTY
HAND COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
BEADLE COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
05/13/80
11/05/76
11/05/76
11/05/76
01/22/80(F)
11/01/77
01/21/77
07/16/76
07/25/75
09/19/75
07/18/75
09/30/88(F)
08/22/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
05/13/81
11/05/77
11/05/77
11/05/77
09/06/89(8)
11/01/78
01/21/78
07/16/77
07/25/76
09/19/76
07/18/76
09/30/89
08/22/76
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 1
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 13
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 13
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470292#
470245B
475421B
470042B
4702 17#
470262#
470027#
47021 1#
470419
470020C
470175#
470006#
470007#
4702 18#
470148B
470398#
470356#
470081 A
470057#
470357#
470205#
470188#
470182#
470087#
470244A
470297B
470147B
470232B
4700 IOC
4700 16#
470368#
470222#
470024#
470176#
470298A
470032#
470092#
4700 14#
470072#
470026#
470348#
470268A
4702 12#
470137#
470382#
470015#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"TENNESSEE
ADAMSVILLE, TOWN OF
ALAMO, TOWN OF
ALCOA, CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF
ANDERSON COUNTY *
ARLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF
ASHLAND CITY, TOWN OF
ATHENS, CITY OF
ATOKA, TOWN OF
USE TIPTON COUNTY (CID 470340) FIRM DATED
4/2/91, PANEL NUMBERS 135 & 150.
AUBURNTOWN, CITY OF
BARTLETT, CITY OF
BEDFORD COUNTY*
BELL BUCKLE, TOWN OF
BENTON COUNTY
BENTON, CITY OF
ELAINE, CITY OF
BLOUNT COUNTY *
BOLIVAR, CITY OF
BRADFORD, CITY OF
BRADLEY COUNTY *
BRENTWOOD, CITY OF
BRIGHTON, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, CITY OF
BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF
BRUCETON, TOWN OF
BULLS GAP, TOWN OF
BYRDSTOWN, CITY OF
CALHOUN, CITY OF
CAMDEN, CITY OF
CAMPBELL COUNTY *
CANNON COUNTY *
CARROLL COUNTY*
CARTER COUNTY *
CARTHAGE, CITY OF
CARYVILLE, TOWN OF
CELINA, CITY OF
CENTER VILLE, TOWN OF
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHATTANOOGA, CITY OF
CHEATHAM COUNTY *
CHESTER COUNTY *
CHURCH HILL,CITY OF
CLAIBORNE COUNTY*
CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY *
CLEVELAND, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
MCNAIRY COUNTY
CROCKETT COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
CHEATHAM COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
CANNON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
GRAINGER COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
BRADLEY COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
PICKETT COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
CANNON COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HICKMAN COUNTY
BRADLEY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CHEATHAM COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
BRADLEY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/86(R)
02/01/90(R)
01/08/72(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/05/84(R)
09/10/81(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/08/01(R)
05/15/86(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/15/98
09/04/85(R)
07/02/9 1(R)
07/03/86(R)
12/05/90(R)
10/30/00(R)
08/19/87(R)
02/16/83(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
02/01/78(R)
06/17/86(R)
07/19/82(R)
03/04/88(R)
02/01/90(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
09/01/90(R)
01/03/90(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/01/89(R)
04/30/86(R)
01/16/87(R)
03/18/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
05/19/81(R)
11/17/94
02/01/87(R)
05/04/88(R)
06/15/84(R)
03/17/95
03/04/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/29/86(M)
02/01/90(L)
04/15/77
06/17/86(M)
01/06/94
12/02/94
12/06/99
12/04/86
05/15/86(M)
12/02/94
12/23/77
09/04/85(M)
07/02/91
07/03/86(M)
12/05/90
06/03/91
08/19/87(M)
02/16/83
09/04/91
06/11/82
04/02/91
07/19/82
03/04/88
02/01/90(L)
07/03/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
07/17/86(M)
08/05/86(M)
07/01/91(L)
09/01/90(L)
10/16/96
09/30/80
09/01/89(L)
07/17/86(M)
01/16/87
03/18/80
05/18/98
12/06/99
11/17/78
02/01/87(L)
05/04/88
06/16/84
03/30/79
04/02/93
Page Iof9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470200#
47000 1#
470033#
470355#
475422#
470263#
475423#
470150#
470269#
470325#
470189#
470053#
47003 8C
470039B
470400#
470037#
470326A
470299A
470152#
47004 1#
470134#
470054#
470046#
470335#
470237#
470043B
470240A
470270#
470284#
470058
470047#
470166
475424#
475425#
47027 IB
470213#
470094#
470272B
47030 1#
470273B
470242A
470387#
470352#
470105#
470344#
470206#
470302A
470096B
Community Name
CLIFTON, CITY OF
CLINTON, TOWN OF
COCKE COUNTY*
COFFEE COUNTY *
COLLEGEDALE, CITY OF
COLLIER VILLE, CITY OF
COLUMBIA, CITY OF
COOKEVILLE, CITY OF
COPPERHILL, CITY OF
CORNERSVILLE, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
COWAN, CITY OF
CRAB ORCHARD, CITY OF
CROSSVILLE, CITY OF
CRUMP, TOWN OF
USE THE HARDIN COUNTY [470082] FIRM
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
CUMBERLAND GAP, CITY OF
DANDRIDGE, TOWN OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DECATUR COUNTY
DECATUR, TOWN OF
DECHERD, CITY OF
DICKSON COUNTY *
DICKSON, CITY OF
DOVER, TOWN OF
DOWELLTOWN, CITY OF
DRESDEN, CITY OF
DUNLAP, CITY OF
DYER COUNTY *
DYER, TOWN OF
DYERSBURG, CITY OF
EAGLEVILLE, CITY OF
EAST RIDGE, CITY OF
ELIZABETHTON, CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF
ERIN, CITY OF
ERWIN, CITY OF
ESTILL SPRINGS, TOWN OF
ETHRIDGE, CITY OF
ETOWAH, CITY OF
FAIRVIEW, CITY OF
FARRAGUT, TOWN OF
FAYETTE COUNTY*
FAYETTEVILLE, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FRIENDSVILLE, CITY OF
GAINESBORO, TOWN OF
County
WAYNE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
COCKE COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MAURY COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
RHEA COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
DICKSON COUNTY
DICKSON COUNTY
STEWART COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
WEAKLEY COUNTY
SEQUATCHIE
COUNTY
DYER COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
DYER COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
UNICOI COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/04/88(R)
07/18/77(R)
01/06/88(R)
07/24/98
12/01/72(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
03/23/73(R)
08/19/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/01/86(R)
03/18/87(R)
03/04/80(R)
06/03/86(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/22/95
03/01/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/03/86(R)
03/04/80(R)
06/15/84(R)
12/16/82(R)
02/01/90(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/01/90(R)
03/04/88(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/30/76(R)
03/01/82(R)
06/17/86(R)
10/27/72(R)
03/30/70(R)
08/19/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/05/84(R)
05/15/86(R)
10/14/99(R)
05/15/86(R)
09/01/90(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/17/88(R)
01/02/92(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/30/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/04/88
07/18/77
04/06/98
08/05/77
03/19/90
12/02/94
08/01/84
08/19/86(M)
02/03/93
02/17/88
04/02/91
03/04/80
06/03/86(M)
07/03/86(M)
07/05/93
09/02/77
03/01/86(L)
06/17/86(M)
07/04/89
01/07/00
06/03/86(M)
09/30/95
06/15/84
11/17/82
02/01/90(L)
08/19/86(M)
02/01/90(L)
03/04/88
07/19/00
(NSFHA)
07/19/00
05/18/98
08/01/83
10/16/96
08/19/86
09/15/93
09/05/84
05/15/86(M)
12/16/88
05/15/86
09/01/90(L)
02/15/85
07/05/83
12/20/99
09/30/95
07/15/88
08/01/86(L)
04/30/86(M)
Page 2 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470185#
470048#
47025 8#
475426#
470353#
470359#
470063#
470287#
470395#
470153#
470345#
470069#
470250#
47023 1#
470346#
47007 1#
470226#
470082#
475427#
470093#
470085#
470227#
470088#
470029C
470186#
470259#
470228#
47009 1#
470304A
470059#
470055#
470397
475428A
470370#
470113#
475429B
475430#
470097#
47543 1#
475432#
470230#
470198#
470224#
470116#
470184#
470289#
470274#
475433#
Community Name
GALLATIN, CITY OF
GALLAWAY, TOWN OF
GATES, TOWN OF
GATLINBURG, CITY OF
GERMANTOWN, CITY OF
GIBSON COUNTY *
GILES COUNTY*
GOODLETTSVILLE, CITY OF
GORDONSVILLE, TOWN OF
USE THE SMITH COUNTY [470283] FIRM
GRAYSVILLE, CITY OF
GREENE COUNTY*
GREENVILLE, TOWN OF
GRUNDY COUNTY *
HALLS, TOWN OF
HAMBLEN COUNTY *
HAMILTON COUNTY *
HANCOCK COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY*
HARRIMAN, CITY OF
HARTSVILLE, TOWN OF
HAWKINS COUNTY*
HAYWOOD COUNTY*
HENDERSON COUNTY *
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HENDERSONVILLE, CITY OF
HENNING, TOWN OF
HENRY COUNTY
HICKMAN COUNTY*
HOHENWALD, CITY OF
HUMBOLDT, CITY OF
HUNTLAND, TOWN OF
HUNTSVILLE, TOWN OF
JACKSBORO, TOWN OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON, CITY OF
JASPER, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON CITY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY*
JELLICO, CITY OF
JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY*
JONESBOROUGH, TOWN OF
KENTON, TOWN OF
KIMBALL, TOWN OF
KINGSPORT, CITY OF
KINGSTON SPRINGS, CITY OF
KINGSTON, CITY OF
KNOX COUNTY *
County
SUMNER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
RHEA COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
HAMBLEN COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
TROUSDALE COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
HICKMAN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
CHEATHAM COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/03/81(R)
07/05/82(R)
07/02/87(R)
10/30/70(R)
01/20/82(R)
10/18/83(R)
04/16/99(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/10/88(R)
05/19/87(R)
08/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
03/01/95(R)
03/18/87(R)
09/05/9 1(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/15/95
09/01/86(R)
02/26/7 1(R)
08/16/82(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/17/90(R)
03/18/86(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
03/04/88(R)
04/28/92(R)
09/01/86(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/24/98
09/29/89(R)
1 2/07/7 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/05/83(R)
02/26/72(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
05/22/70(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/30/82(R)
12/02/85(R)
05/19/87(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/11/84(R)
12/15/78(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/81
07/05/82
07/02/87
02/15/84
12/02/94
10/18/83
01/02/92
04/20/01
07/07/99
12/02/88
03/18/91
08/23/00
03/01/95(L)
03/18/87
03/18/91
08/02/94
07/14/78
04/02/91
09/05/84
08/16/82
03/18/91
09/01/86(L)
09/02/88
03/18/86(M)
08/16/95
03/04/88
06/06/01
09/01/86(L)
07/02/87
09/15/83
11/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
05/28/76
09/04/85(M)
01/21/98
06/10/77
05/22/81
1 1/02/90
09/30/92
10/16/96
07/17/86(M)
10/16/96
02/16/83
05/19/87
06/04/90
12/06/99
12/15/78(M)
05/16/83
Page 3 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
475434#
475435#
475436A
470334#
470333#
470167#
470354#
475437#
470208#
475438#
470103#
470121#
470089#
470044B
470104#
470145#
470143B
470107#
470110#
470405
470209A
470138#
470065C
47037 1#
470112#
470035#
470114#
470119#
470202#
475439B
470191#
470123#
470308
470023B
470195#
470127#
470177#
470060#
470388#
470178#
470136#
470139#
470070#
470311
470125#
470275B
470290#
470168#
470040#
470377#
Community Name
KNOXVILLE, CITY OF
LAFOLLETTE, CITY OF
LAKE CITY, TOWN OF
LAKE COUNTY *
LAUDERDALE COUNTY*
LAVERGNE, CITY OF
LAWRENCE COUNTY *
LAWRENCEBURG, CITY OF
LEBANON, CITY OF
LENOIR CITY, CITY OF
LEWIS COUNTY *
LEWISBURG, CITY OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LIBERTY, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LINDEN, TOWN OF
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LOUDON COUNTY*
LOUDON, CITY OF
LOUISVILLE, TOWN OF
LUTTRELL, CITY OF
LYNCHBURG-MOORE COUNTY, METROPOLITAN
GOVERNMENT OF
LYNNVILLE, CITY OF
MACON COUNTY *
MADISON COUNTY *
MANCHESTER, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY *
MARSHALL COUNTY*
MARTIN, CITY OF
MARYVILLE, CITY OF
MASON, CITY OF
MAURY COUNTY*
MCEWEN, CITY OF
MCKENZIE, TOWN OF
MCMINNVILLE, CITY OF
MCNAIRY COUNTY*
MEMPHIS, CITY OF
MILAN, TOWN OF
MILLERSVILLE, CITY OF
MILLINGTON, CITY OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MORGAN COUNTY
MORRISTOWN, CITY OF
MOUNT CARMEL, TOWN OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN CITY, CITY OF
MT. JULIET, CITY OF
MURFREESBORO, CITY OF
NASHVILLE, CITY OF & DAVIDSON COUNTY
NEW HOPE, CITY OF
County
KNOX COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
LOUDON COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
OVERTON COUNTY
LOUDON COUNTY
LOUDON COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
WEAKLEY COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
MAURY COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
HAMBLEN COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
MAURY COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/30/7 1(R)
12/17/71(R)
02/26/7 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
09/30/87(R)
06/15/84(R)
12/10/98(R)
05/25/73(R)
01/06/83(R)
07/21/72(R)
1 1/25/98
02/17/88(R)
09/02/88(R)
09/04/86(R)
10/01/92(R)
08/05/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
01/26/96
09/01/89(R)
09/29/86(R)
07/01/00(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/05/83(R)
10/17/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
02/17/88(R)
09/15/89(R)
1 2/07/7 1(R)
05/15/86(R)
11/03/89(R)
05/01/94(R)
09/04/85(R)
12/01/77(R)
07/01/88(R)
12/01/82(R)
02/16/83(R)
06/15/84(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/15/84(R)
03/01/87(R)
06/15/78(R)
04/17/97
02/17/88(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/17/82(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/17/91
09/05/84
1 1/26/76
03/16/81
12/05/95
1 1/08/99
12/16/88
12/16/88
02/03/93
08/18/92
02/09/79
02/17/88
09/02/88
09/04/86(M)
12/20/99
08/05/86(M)
06/03/86(M)
08/03/92
05/07/82
09/01/89(L)
09/29/86(M)
07/01/00(L)
09/04/85(M)
01/21/98
03/04/88
05/16/80
02/17/88
09/15/89
06/29/79
04/02/91
11/03/89
05/01/94(L)
09/04/85(M)
03/16/88
04/02/91
12/02/94
02/16/83
06/15/84
12/02/94
06/15/84
03/01/87(L)
02/11/83
02/17/88
08/05/86(M)
05/16/94
11/08/99
04/20/01
09/27/85(M)
Page 4 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470266#
470385#
470030B
470386#
475440#
470003#
47035 1#
475441#
470140#
470418
47036 1#
470253#
470005#
470170B
470362#
470090#
470316
47029 1#
470144#
470106#
470276B
470384#
475442#
47001 1#
470401
470378#
470417
47026 1#
470187B
470067#
470149#
470076#
470111#
470151#
470338
470100#
470235A
470267#
4701 5 8#
470320
475443A
470086#
470050#
470165#
47006 1#
Community Name
NEW JOHNSONVILLE, CITY OF
NEW MARKET, TOWN OF
NEW TAZEWELL, CITY OF
NEWBERN, CITY OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NORRIS, CITY OF
OAK HILL, TOWN OF
OAK RIDGE, CITY OF
OAKDALE, CITY OF
OAKLAND, TOWN OF
OBION COUNTY *
OBION, TOWN OF
OLIVER SPRINGS, TOWN OF
ONEIDA, TOWN OF
OVERTON COUNTY *
PARIS, CITY OF
PARSONS, TOWN OF
PEGRAM, TOWNSHIP OF
PERRY COUNTY*
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF
PICKETT COUNTY*
PIGEON FORGE, CITY OF
PIKEVILLE, CITY OF
PIPERTON, CITY OF
PITTMAN CENTER, TOWN OF
PLAINVIEW, CITY OF
Community has referenced panel number 470194 0100B of
the Union County FIRM in its flood damage prevention
ordinance.
POLK COUNTY *
PORTLAND,CITY OF
PULASKI, CITY OF
PUTNAM COUNTY *
RED BANK, CITY OF
RED BOILING SPRINGS, CITY OF
RHEA COUNTY
RIDGELY, TOWN OF
RIPLEY, TOWN OF
RIVES, CITY OF
ROANE COUNTY *
ROBERTSON COUNTY
ROCKFORD, CITY OF
USE THE BLOUNT COUNTY [470356] FIRM
ROCKWOOD, CITY OF
ROGERSVILLE, CITY OF
ROSSVILLE, CITY OF
RUTHERFORD COUNTY *
RUTHERFORD, TOWN OF
County
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
DYER COUNTY
COCKE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
OVERTON COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
CHEATHAM COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
LOUDON COUNTY
PICKETT COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
BLEDSOE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
RHEA COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
LAUDERDALE
COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/29/86(R)
09/30/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/09/00(R)
09/03/7 1(R)
06/25/76(R)
04/01/80(R)
10/27/72(R)
09/29/86(R)
01/03/01
03/04/98(R)
03/16/81(R)
05/15/80(R)
06/17/86(R)
12/09/99
07/05/83(R)
04/28/92
04/09/87(R)
08/10/99
09/29/86(R)
06/03/86(R)
11/17/94
09/01/72(R)
05/17/88(R)
12/16/94(R)
03/01/95(R)
12/09/99(R)
06/16/95(R)
08/04/87(R)
01/16/87(R)
08/27/97
03/15/79(R)
04/15/88(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
10/28/77(R)
05/19/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/15/84(R)
07/26/96(R)
05/15/70(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/15/84(R)
08/27/97(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/04/87
09/30/87(M)
08/05/86(M)
07/19/00
04/06/98
01/06/94
04/20/01
07/06/98
09/29/86
06/17/91
03/16/81
05/15/80
06/17/86(M)
01/13/78
06/06/01
06/11/76
12/06/99
12/22/78
12/20/99
06/03/86(M)
12/29/78
09/18/87
05/17/88
(NSFHA)
03/01/95(L)
06/16/95
08/04/87(M)
01/16/87
11/01/98(L)
09/05/90
04/15/88
09/04/91
05/19/87
09/01/87(L)
07/05/84
06/15/84
09/24/76
01/14/77
07/19/93
06/01/81
11/08/99
09/30/83
Page 5 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470083B
470084C
470322A
470132#
475444#
4702 14#
470008#
470078
470283#
470045B
470169#
470080B
475445#
47005 1#
470183#
475446#
475447#
470203#
475448#
470278#
470163#
470181#
470349#
470279B
470135#
475449A
470340#
470350#
470062#
470223#
470192#
470252B
470036#
470329
47023 8#
470142#
470196#
470330#
470363#
470009#
470265#
47033 1#
470380A
470095#
47020 1#
470365#
470339
Community Name
SALTILLO, TOWN OF
SAVANNAH, CITY OF
SCOTTS HILL, TOWN OF
SELMER, CITY OF
SEVIERVILLE, CITY OF
SHELBY COUNTY *
SHELBYVILLE, CITY OF
SIGNAL MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
SMITH COUNTY *
SMITHVILLE, CITY OF
SMYRNA, TOWN OF
SNEEDVILLE,TOWN OF
SODDY-DAISY, CITY OF
SOMERVILLE, TOWN OF
SOUTH CARTHAGE, TOWN OF
SOUTH FULTON, CITY OF
SOUTH PITTSBURG, CITY OF
SPARTA, CITY OF
SPRING CITY, TOWN OF
SPRING HILL, CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF
SULLIVAN COUNTY *
SUMNER COUNTY*
SURGOINSVILLE, CITY OF
SWEETWATER, CITY OF
TAZEWELL, CITY OF
TIPTON COUNTY *
TIPTONVILLE, TOWN OF
TRENTON, CITY OF
TRIMBLE, TOWN OF
TROUSDALE COUNTY *
TROY,TOWN OF
TULLAHOMA, CITY OF
TUSCULUM, CITY OF
USE PANEL 150C OF THE GREENE COUNTY FIRM
DATED.
UNICOI COUNTY *
UNION CITY, CITY OF
VIOLA, TOWN OF
VONORE, TOWN OF
WARREN COUNTY*
WARTRACE, TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WATAUGA, CITY OF
WATERTOWN, CITY OF
WAVERLY, CITY OF
WAYNESBORO, CITY OF
WHITE COUNTY *
WHITE HOUSE, CITY OF
County
HARDIN COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
RHEA COUNTY
MAURY COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
HAWKINS COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
CLAIBORNE COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
DYER COUNTY
TROUSDALE COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
COFFEE COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
UNICOI COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CARTER COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WHITE COUNTY
SUMNER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/94(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/17/86(R)
06/04/87(R)
03/27/7 1(R)
12/01/82(R)
02/17/88(R)
06/28/79(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
07/17/86(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/03/72(R)
07/05/82(R)
11/05/80(R)
06/15/73(R)
04/14/72(R)
11/02/77(R)
12/22/72(R)
05/04/87(R)
09/30/83(R)
09/30/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
07/17/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
10/30/70(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
03/16/81(R)
02/16/83(R)
06/04/87(R)
08/16/82(R)
07/03/86(R)
04/16/79(R)
07/14/00(R)
01/03/85(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/03/86(R)
06/17/86(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/27/97(R)
01/01/87(R)
03/04/86(R)
01/16/87(R)
08/27/97
06/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/94(L)
07/03/86(M)
07/17/86(M)
06/04/87(M)
01/17/97
12/02/94
01/17/97
(NSFHA)
07/07/99
07/17/86(M)
05/18/98
06/17/86(M)
06/01/83
07/05/82
11/05/80
06/19/81
10/16/92
08/27/82
02/05/92
05/04/87
09/30/83
06/16/93
07/19/85
07/17/86(M)
09/07/00
07/23/76
04/02/91
03/16/81
02/16/83
07/19/00
08/16/82
07/03/86(M)
06/05/89
01/03/85
05/05/81
03/16/88
06/17/86(M)
03/16/88
09/01/87(L)
10/16/96
10/16/96
01/01/87(L)
03/04/86
01/16/87
11/01/98(L)
06/01/88(L)
Page 6 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Community Name
470332# WHITE PINE, CITY OF
470412 WHITEVILLE, TOWN OF
470204# WILLIAMSON COUNTY *
470207# WILSON COUNTY *
470021 # WOODBURY, TOWN OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
CANNON COUNTY
289
271
4
69
18
14
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/87(R)
04/13/98
04/01/81(R)
06/15/84(R)
09/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/03/92
08/16/93
05/16/94
09/01/77
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
470159
470293#
470294
470408#
470220
470406#
470128A
470295
4702 19#
470296
470373#
470374#
470120#
470225
470324
470383#
470375#
470300
470369#
470376#
470064#
470028
470343#
470129A
470407#
470221
470190#
470068#
470303#
470360#
470305
470288
470347#
470229#
470022#
470101#
470409#
470146A
470075A
470306#
470307
47021 OB
470126#
470403#
470133#
470336#
470130
470066#
Community Name
"TENNESSEE
ADAMS, TOWN OF
ARDMORE, TOWN OF
BAILEYTOWN, TOWN OF
BELLE MEADE, CITY OF
BELLS, TOWN OF
BERRY HILL, CITY OF
BETHEL SPRINGS, TOWN OF
BIG SANDY, TOWN OF
BLEDSOE COUNTY
BLUFF CITY, TOWN OF
BURLISON, TOWN OF
CENTERTOWN, TOWN OF
CHAPEL HILL, TOWN OF
COALMONT, TOWN OF
COLLINWOOD, CITY OF
CROCKETT COUNTY *
CUMBERLAND CITY, TOWN OF
DECATURVILLE, TOWN OF
DEKALB COUNTY *
EAST VIEW, TOWN OF
ELKTON, CITY OF
ENVILLE, TOWN OF
FENTREES COUNTY *
FINGER, TOWN OF
FOREST HILLS, CITY OF
GADSDEN, TOWN OF
GILT EDGE, CITY OF
GRAINGER COUNTY
GREENBACK, CITY OF
HARDEMAN COUNTY *
HOLLOW ROCK, CITY OF
HORNSBY, TOWN OF
HOUSTON COUNTY *
HUMPHREYS COUNTY
HUNTINGDON, TOWN OF
IRON CITY, CITY OF
LAKEWOOD, CITY OF
LOBELVILLE, TOWN OF
LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
LORETTO, CITY OF
MADISONVILLE, TOWN OF
MAYNARDVILLE, CITY OF
MCMINN COUNTY*
MEDON, TOWN OF
MEIGS COUNTY
MICHIE, CITY OF
MILLEDGEVILLE, TOWN OF
MINOR HILL, CITY OF
County
ROBERTSON COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
DAVIDSON
CROCKETT COUNTY
DAVIDSON
MCNAIRY COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
BLEDSOE COUNTY
SULLIVAN COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
CROCKETT COUNTY
STEWART COUNTY
DECATUR COUNTY
DEKALB COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
CHESTER COUNTY
FENTRESS COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
DAVIDSON
CROCKETT COUNTY
TIPTON COUNTY
GRAINGER COUNTY
LOUDON COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
HUMPHREYS
COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PERRY COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MEIGS COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
11/15/74
12/17/76
09/03/76
06/15/82(F)
01/10/75
06/15/82(F)
06/28/74
09/24/76
02/16/79
07/02/76
04/02/9 1(F)
03/16/88(F)
1 1/06/8 1(F)
09/24/76
06/04/76
01/12/79
11/03/78
09/24/76
09/27/9 1(F)
11/10/78
06/04/76
10/29/76
12/09/77
09/06/74
06/15/82(F)
01/24/75
04/02/9 1(F)
05/03/90(F)
09/30/88(F)
04/02/9 1(F)
06/25/76
03/05/76
08/19/77
08/26/77
06/03/88(F)
12/16/88(F)
06/15/82(F)
01/13/78
09/01/86(F)
12/16/88(F)
12/10/76
06/03/86(F)
09/04/9 1(F)
01/21/98(F)
11/16/90(F)
10/01/76
07/02/76
07/02/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
11/15/75
12/17/77
09/03/77
12/27/75
01/10/76
12/27/75
06/28/75
09/24/77
02/16/80
07/02/77
10/13/79
09/22/79
06/14/75
09/24/77
06/04/77
01/12/80
11/03/79
09/24/77
12/08/79
11/10/79
06/04/77
10/29/77
12/09/78
09/06/75
12/27/75
01/24/76
09/13/75
01/06/79
09/28/90(8)
01/20/79
06/25/77
03/05/77
08/19/78
08/26/78
06/03/88(8)
06/14/75
12/27/75
01/13/79
06/20/86(W)
07/02/77
12/10/77
06/03/86(8)
07/01/78
01/21/99
12/02/78
10/01/77
07/02/77
07/02/77
Page 8 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
470233#
470049#
470310
470312
470313A
470314
4703 15#
4703 17#
470131
470277A
470379A
47034 1#
470171#
470236#
470239
470327#
470256A
470328
470180#
470280A
470337
470281
470282A
470243A
470194#
470342#
470199#
470364#
470179
470118A
470056#
470381#
470254
Community Name
MONROE COUNTY
MOSCOW, CITY OF
MOSHEIM, TOWN OF
NIOTA, CITY OF
NORMANDY, TOWN OF
ORME, TOWN OF
PARROTTSVILLE, TOWN OF
PURYEAR, TOWN OF
RAMER, TOWN OF
RICHARD CITY, CITY OF
SAMBURG, TOWN OF
SCOTT COUNTY *
SEQUATCHIE COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SPENCER, TOWN OF
ST. JOSEPH, CITY OF
STANTON, TOWN OF
STANTONVILLE, TOWN OF
STEWART COUNTY *
TELLICO PLAINS, CITY OF
TENNESSEE RIDGE, CITY OF
TOWNSEND, CITY OF
TRACY CITY, CITY OF
TREZEVANT, TOWN OF
UNION COUNTY *
VAN BUREN COUNTY *
WAYNE COUNTY *
WEAKLEY COUNTY *
WHITEHAVEN, CITY OF
WHITWELL, CITY OF
WINCHESTER, CITY OF
WOODLAND MILLS, CITY OF
YORKVILLE, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
MONROE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
MCMINN COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
COCKE COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
SEQUATCHIE
COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
MCNAIRY COUNTY
STEWART COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
BLOUNT COUNTY
GRUNDY COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
VAN BUREN COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WEAKLEY COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OBION COUNTY
GIBSON COUNTY
0
4
2
Hazard Area
Identified
09/04/9 1(F)
06/01/81(F)
09/03/76
05/28/76
06/11/76
07/02/76
01/06/88(F)
06/06/0 1(F)
1 1/29/74
02/01/74
09/15/78
12/23/77(F)
10/21/77
06/15/84(F)
02/07/75
12/16/88(F)
03/10/78(F)
06/11/76
09/13/74
03/08/74
06/25/76
06/18/76
05/10/74
02/25/77
07/16/90(F)
12/01/78
03/16/79
07/02/9 1(F)
12/02/94(F)
02/15/74
07/02/80(F)
09/29/78
06/27/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/08/78
06/01/81(8)
09/03/77
05/28/77
06/11/77
07/02/77
07/02/77
06/11/77
1 1/29/75
02/01/75
09/15/79
12/23/78
10/21/78
1 1/25/78
02/07/76
06/25/77
03/10/79
06/11/77
09/13/75
03/08/75
06/25/77
06/18/77
05/10/75
02/25/78
11/24/79
12/01/79
03/16/80
12/16/78
12/02/95
02/15/75
06/05/89(W)
09/29/79
06/27/76
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 79
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 79
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 9 of 9
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
48027 IB
485450#
480504A
480036#
480335C
480565#
481659#
480394#
480131#
480085#
480740A
481571#
480397#
48545 1#
480529#
480120#
48000 1#
480006
480007#
480064#
480132#
481665#
480401
480804D
480353B
485452#
485453#
480698#
481078#
481619#
480775#
485454#
480790A
4800 14#
480324#
480117#
480776#
480704#
480624#
481086A
480983A
480584#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"TEXAS
ABERNATHY, CITY OF
ABILENE, CITY OF
AGUA DULCE, CITY OF
ALAMO HEIGHTS, CITY OF
ALAMO, CITY OF
ALBANY, CITY OF
ALEDO, CITY OF
ALICE, CITY OF
ALLEN, CITY OF
ALPINE, CITY OF
ALTO, TOWN OF
ALTON, CITY OF
ALVARADO, CITY OF
ALVIN, CITY OF
AMARILLO, CITY OF
ANAHUAC, CITY OF
ANDERSON COUNTY*
ANDREWS, CITY OF
ANGELINA COUNTY *
ANGLETON, CITY OF
ANNA, CITY OF
ANNETTA SOUTH, TOWN OF
ANSON, CITY OF
ANTHONY,TOWN OF
ANTON, CITY OF
ARANSAS COUNTY *
ARANSAS PASS, CITY OF
ARCHER CITY, CITY OF
ARCHER COUNTY*
ARCOLA CITY OF
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM.
ARGYLE, CITY OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
ASHERTON, CITY OF
ATASCOSA COUNTY *
ATHENS, CITY OF
ATLANTA, CITY OF
AUBREY, CITY OF
AUSTIN COUNTY *
AUSTIN, CITY OF
AUSTWELL, CITY OF
AVERY, CITY OF
AZLE, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
HALE COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
SHACKELFORD
COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
JIM WELLS COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
BREWSTER COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ANDREWS COUNTY
ANGELINA COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
ARANSAS COUNTY
ARANSAS COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
DIMMIT COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
AUSTIN COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
REFUGIO COUNTY
RED RIVER COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/24/82(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
03/26/7 1(R)
08/15/78(R)
01/30/79(R)
07/17/86(R)
01/29/97(R)
03/01/84(R)
06/01/78(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/01/81(R)
05/04/82(R)
02/18/72(R)
07/19/82(R)
07/16/81(R)
05/01/92(R)
02/05/01
07/01/98(R)
06/10/77(R)
11/19/96(R)
11/01/99(R)
05/25/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/24/82(R)
08/06/71(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
10/16/79(R)
01/06/88(R)
09/26/88(R)
04/16/90(R)
12/30/70(R)
09/01/87(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/05/81(R)
05/19/81(R)
04/02/97(R)
01/17/90(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/14/82(R)
10/15/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/24/82(M)
02/03/93
12/12/75
07/05/84
09/25/79
07/17/86
01/03/97
03/01/84
12/19/97
11/16/90
08/19/85(M)
06/08/82(M)
01/06/99
09/22/99
02/08/99
01/06/83
05/01/92(L)
08/27/76
07/01/98(L)
09/22/99
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
08/01/87(L)
08/24/82(M)
05/04/92
05/04/92
10/16/79(M)
01/06/88
04/20/00
03/30/98
08/23/00
09/01/87(L)
06/15/81
08/17/98
05/19/81
03/30/98
06/16/99
01/19/00
09/04/85(M)
09/14/82(M)
08/23/00
Page Iof28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481206
480808
480065#
480722A
480166#
481094#
480549#
480537#
480020#
48002 1#
48071 8A
481087#
480707#
481501#
481193#
480022#
485455#
481207#
481589#
481586#
485456#
480102
480121#
481679#
485457#
480585#
481610#
480026#
480027#
480706#
480289#
480457#
481095#
480028#
480792A
480586#
480925#
480878#
480035#
480534
481596#
480360#
480505#
48071 1#
480050#
480719#
Community Name
BAILEY COUNTY *
BAILEY, TOWN OF
BAILEYS PRAIRIE, VILLAGE OF
BAIRD,TOWN OF
BALCH SPRINGS, CITY OF
BALCONES HEIGHTS, CITY OF
BALLINGER, CITY OF
BALMORHEA, CITY OF
BANDERA COUNTY *
BANDERA, CITY OF
BANGS, TOWN OF
BARD WELL, CITY OF
BARTLETT, CITY OF
BARTONVILLE, TOWN OF
BASTROP COUNTY *
BASTROP, CITY OF
BAY CITY, CITY OF
BAYLOR COUNTY*
BAYOU VISTA, VILLAGE OF
USE THE GALVESTON COUNTY [485470] FIRM.
BAYSIDE, CITY OF
BAYTOWN, CITY OF
BAYVIEW, TOWN OF
BEACH CITY, CITY OF
BEAR CREEK, VILLAGE OF
THE VILLAGE OF BEAR CREEK HAS ADOPTED THE
HAYS COUNTY (480321) FIRM DATED 2-18-98.
BEAUMONT, CITY OF
BEDFORD, CITY OF
BEE CAVE, VILLAGE OF
BEE COUNTY *
BEEVILLE, CITY OF
BELL COUNTY *
THE CITY OF SALEDO, BELL COUNTY (480033) IS A
PART OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF BELL
COUNTY (480706).
BELLAIRE, CITY OF
BELLMEAD, CITY OF
BELLVILLE, CITY OF
BELTON, CITY OF
BENAVIDES, CITY OF
BENBROOK, CITY OF
BEVERLY HILLS, CITY OF
BEVIL OAKS, CITY OF
BEXAR COUNTY *
BIG LAKE, CITY OF
BIG OAKS M.U.D.
BIG SPRING, CITY OF
BISHOP, CITY OF
BLANCO COUNTY
BLANCO, CITY OF
BLANKET, TOWN OF
County
BAILEY COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
CALLAHAN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
RUNNELS COUNTY
REEVES COUNTY
BANDERA COUNTY
BANDERA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
BASTROP COUNTY
BASTROP COUNTY
MATAGORDA
COUNTY
BAYLOR COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
REFUGIO COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
BEE COUNTY
BEE COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
AUSTIN COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
REAGAN COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
BLANCO COUNTY
BLANCO COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/06/01
07/01/92(R)
12/15/83(R)
04/01/87(R)
09/03/80(R)
04/15/80(R)
02/16/90(R)
11/01/85(R)
11/01/78(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/01/91(R)
03/25/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/19/91(R)
08/19/91(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
04/15/86(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
03/18/85(R)
07/01/74(R)
09/01/81(R)
01/19/83(R)
03/24/98(R)
10/30/70(R)
07/18/77(R)
04/12/88(R)
04/01/82(R)
01/20/82(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/15/78(R)
06/17/98(R)
07/05/82(R)
03/04/86(R)
07/02/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
10/16/84(R)
07/21/78(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/02/92(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/92(L)
11/17/93
04/01/87(L)
03/02/89
04/15/80
02/16/90
09/16/88
02/15/91
07/17/89
06/19/85(M)
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
03/30/98
12/08/98
12/08/98
06/05/85
04/15/86(M)
03/18/85
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
01/19/83
03/16/92
08/02/95
04/01/82
01/20/82
02/15/84
04/20/00
09/15/78
06/16/99
07/05/82
03/04/86(M)
08/23/00
09/15/78
09/04/87
02/16/96
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/30/81
04/15/81
02/06/91
02/06/91
04/02/92
Page 2 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480952A
480892A
480587#
481628#
480350A
48041 8#
481582#
480222#
481300#
480444#
480374#
480051 A
481194#
48048 1#
480676#
480422
480455#
485458#
480066#
481195#
480578#
480648#
480084#
481649
48051 1#
480677#
480128#
481196#
481097#
480067#
480717#
481542#
480620#
480103#
480087#
480082#
480877A
481549#
481138A
480568#
481681
481683
481682
480290#
480658#
481169#
Community Name
BLOOMING GROVE, CITY OF
BLOSSOM, TOWN OF
BLUE MOUND, CITY OF
BLUE RIDGE, TOWN OF
BLUM, CITY OF
BOERNE, CITY OF
BONHAM WATER AUTHORITY
BONHAM, CITY OF
BONNEY, TOWN OF
BOOKER, CITY OF
BORGER, CITY OF
BOSQUE COUNTY*
BOWIE COUNTY *
BOWIE, CITY OF
BO YD, CITY OF
BRACKETTVILLE, CITY OF
BRADY, CITY OF
BRAZORIA COUNTY *
BRAZORIA, CITY OF
BRAZOS COUNTY *
BRECKENRIDGE, CITY OF
BRENHAM, CITY OF
BREWSTER COUNTY *
BRIARCLIFF, VILLAGE OF
USE THE TRAVIS COUNTY [481026] FIRM
BRIDGE CITY, CITY OF
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BRONTE, CITY OF
BROOKS COUNTY*
BROOKSHIRE, CITY OF
BROOKSIDE VILLAGE, CITY OF
BROWN COUNTY*
BROWNDELL, TOWN OF
BROWNFIELD, CITY OF
BROWNSVILLE, CITY OF
BROWNWOOD, CITY OF
BRYAN, CITY OF
BRYSON, CITY OF
BUCKHOLTS, CITY OF
BUFFALO GAP, TOWNSHIP OF
BULLARD, CITY OF
BUL VERDE EAST, CITY OF
THE CITY OF BUL VERDE EAST HAS ADOPTED THE
COMAL COUNTY (485463) FIRM DATED 7-17-95.
BUL VERDE NORTH, CITY OF
THE CITY OF BUL VERDE NORTH HAS ADOPTED THE
COMAL COUNTY(485463) FIRM DATED 7-17-95.
BUL VERDE SOUTH, CITY OF
THE CITY OF BUL VERDE SOUTH HAS ADOPTED THE
COMAL COUNTY (485463) FIRM DATED 7-17-95.
BUNKER HILL VILLAGE, CITY OF
BURKBURNETT, CITY OF
BURLESON COUNTY*
County
NAVARRO COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
LIPSCOMB COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
MONTAGUE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
KINNEY COUNTY
MCCULLOCH
COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
BRAZOS COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BREWSTER COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
COKE COUNTY
BROOKS COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
TERRY COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
BRAZOS COUNTY
JACK COUNTY
MILAM COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
BURLESON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/24/78(R)
11/01/85(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/30/83(R)
02/01/88(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/10/77(R)
04/16/90(R)
03/01/91(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/02/77(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/03/84(R)
10/15/81(R)
05/07/71(R)
12/15/83(R)
07/02/92(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
08/17/81(R)
ll/23/99(R)
05/12/93(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/04/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
11/01/84(R)
03/01/91(R)
07/03/85(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
12/01/78(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
05/19/81(R)
11/01/89(R)
05/03/01
03/16/88(R)
04/24/79(R)
03/24/98(R)
05/12/98(R)
04/16/98(R)
04/17/79(R)
12/15/82(R)
01/18/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/24/78(M)
11/01/85(M)
08/23/00
12/19/97
08/01/87(L)
09/30/83
02/01/88(L)
05/05/81
09/22/99
04/16/90
02/02/96
08/01/87(L)
09/27/91
01/17/91
03/19/90
(NSFHA)
10/15/81
09/22/99
09/22/99
02/09/00
01/02/91
08/17/81
04/02/91
09/02/82
03/19/90
03/04/86(M)
07/01/87(L)
02/17/89
09/22/99
03/01/91(L)
07/03/85(M)
09/30/81
12/01/78
07/06/82
02/09/00
11/01/89(L)
03/18/80
03/16/88
04/24/79(M)
(NSFHA)
12/15/82
01/18/89
Page 3 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
485459#
481209#
480092#
480649
480094#
480089#
480097#
480989#
480101#
480478#
480979A
480323
480632#
480533#
481505#
480199A
480167#
480519#
480037#
480737A
480932#
480168#
481282#
480365#
480133#
481680
480566#
480119#
480326#
481537#
481568#
480739#
481053#
481170
480125A
481141#
480267#
480203#
481566#
481584#
481253#
480742#
485461#
485462#
480439#
480052A
Community Name
BURLESON, CITY OF
BURNET COUNTY *
BURNET, CITY OF
BURTON, CITY OF
CALDWELL COUNTY*
CALDWELL, CITY OF
CALHOUN COUNTY *
CALVERT, CITY OF
CAMERON COUNTY *
CAMERON, CITY OF
CAMP WOOD, CITY OF
CANADIAN, CITY OF
CANTON, CITY OF
CANYON, CITY OF
CARMINE, CITY OF
CARRIZO SPRINGS, CITY OF
CARROLLTON, CITY OF
CARTHAGE, CITY OF
CASTLE HILLS, CITY OF
CASTRO COUNTY*
CASTROVILLE, CITY OF
CEDAR HILL, CITY OF
CEDAR PARK, CITY OF
CELESTE, CITY OF
CELINA, CITY OF
CENTER POINT, CITY OF
THE CITY OF CENTER POINT HAS ADOPTED THE
KERR COUNTY (480419) FIRM DATED 5-1-79.
CENTER, CITY OF
CHAMBERS COUNTY *
CHANDLER, CITY OF
CHATEAU WOODS, CITY OF
CHELFORD M.U.D., CITY
CHEROKEE COUNTY*
CHICO, CITY OF
CHILDRESS COUNTY
CHILDRESS,CITY OF
CHINA GROVE, CITY OF
CIBOLO, CITY OF
CISCO, CITY OF
CITIES M.U.D. NO. 2, CITY OF
CLARENDON, CITY OF
CLARKSVILLE, CITY OF
CLAY COUNTY*
CLEAR LAKE SHORES, CITY OF
CLEBURNE, CITY OF
CLEVELAND,CITY OF
CLIFTON,CITY OF
County
JOHNSON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
BURLESON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
MILAM COUNTY
REAL COUNTY
HEMPHILL COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
DIMMIT COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
CASTRO COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
KERR COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
CHILDRESS COUNTY
CHILDRESS COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
DONLEY COUNTY
RED RIVER COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/02/73(R)
11/16/90(R)
09/18/87(R)
04/26/95
03/15/82(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/19/71(R)
07/06/82(R)
06/15/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/15/85(R)
06/01/88(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/20/82(R)
07/18/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/23/79(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/05/01
05/01/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
11/01/79(R)
03/24/98(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/15/83(R)
10/24/78(R)
07/17/86(R)
12/18/87(R)
12/01/89(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/28/00
08/01/87(R)
06/15/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
01/23/79(R)
07/16/84(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/04/90(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
10/23/70(R)
06/23/72(R)
08/04/87(R)
04/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/23/00
11/16/90
11/16/90
12/20/74
07/21/99
09/30/88
06/16/99
07/06/82(M)
03/09/99
12/02/92
02/15/85(M)
06/01/88(L)
09/29/86
05/15/91
07/18/85(M)
07/01/87(L)
06/04/96
01/23/79(M)
09/28/84
06/03/77
05/01/79
05/17/88
01/19/00
10/20/98
12/19/97
09/04/85(M)
05/18/99
08/17/98
09/22/99
04/20/00
06/02/95
03/19/90
08/01/87(L)
06/15/84
06/02/95
01/23/79(M)
07/16/84
08/19/86
06/04/90
04/02/91
04/04/83
01/06/99
08/04/87
04/01/87(L)
Page 4 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
48 1260 A
480068#
480721
480746
480169A
480748
481599
480750
480129#
480083#
480590#
480130#
480760
480480A
480144#
481489#
480145#
485463#
480150
480151#
480104
480366#
480484#
480038#
480765#
480911 A
480170#
481508#
480155#
481143#
485464#
480527#
480498#
480768#
481614#
480431 A
480409B
481211
480501
481512#
480359#
481212
480159B
481513#
481685#
480819A
480591#
480688A
480196#
480162#
Community Name
CLINT, TOWN OF
CLUTE, CITY OF
CLYDE, CITY OF
COCHRAN COUNTY
COCKRELL HILL, CITY OF
COKE COUNTY
COLDSPRING, CITY OF
COLEMAN COUNTY*
COLEMAN, CITY OF
COLLEGE STATION, CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TOWN OF
COLLIN COUNTY*
COLLINGSWORTH COUNTY
COLORADO CITY, CITY OF
COLORADO COUNTY *
COLORADO COUNTY - WCID#2
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COMAL COUNTY*
COMANCHE COUNTY
COMANCHE, CITY OF
COMBES, TOWN OF
COMMERCE, CITY OF
CONROE, CITY OF
CONVERSE, CITY OF
COOKE COUNTY*
COOLIDGE, CITY OF
COPPELL, CITY OF
COPPER CANYON, TOWN OF
COPPERAS COVE, CITY OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
CORPUS CHRISTI, CITY OF
CORRIGAN, CITY OF
CORSICANA, CITY OF
COR YELL COUNTY *
COTTONWOOD SHORES, CITY OF
COTULLA,CITY OF
GRAND ALL, CITY OF
CRANE COUNTY *
CRANE, CITY OF
CRANFILLS GAP, CITY OF
CROCKETT, CITY OF
CROSBY COUNTY
CROSBYTON, CITY OF
CROSS ROADS, TOWN OF
CROSS TIMBER, CITY OF
ADOPTED JOHNSON COUNTY FIRM (480879) PANELS
39 and 50.
CROWELL, CITY OF
CROWLEY, CITY OF
CRYSTAL CITY, CITY OF
CUERO, CITY OF
CULBERSON COUNTY *
County
EL PASO COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
CALLAHAN COUNTY
COCHRAN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
COKE COUNTY
SAN JACINTO
COUNTY
COLEMAN COUNTY
COLEMAN COUNTY
BRAZOS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
COLLINGSWORTH
COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
COLORADO COUNTY
COLORADO COUNTY
COLORADO COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
COOKE COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
COR YELL COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
COR YELL COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
LASALLE COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
CRANE COUNTY
CRANE COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
CROSBY COUNTY
CROSBY COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
FOARD COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
ZAVALA COUNTY
DEWITT COUNTY
CULBERSON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/87(R)
12/07/76(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/04/00
02/29/96
02/21/01
05/11/87(R)
07/04/96
04/01/81(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/01/82(R)
06/16/81(R)
08/14/00
04/01/87(R)
09/19/90(R)
06/01/88(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/09/73(R)
06/20/90
12/07/82(R)
09/01/81(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
05/16/77(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
11/01/89(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/18/87(R)
11/21/78(R)
05/15/79(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
04/20/82(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
11/16/90(R)
04/01/87(R)
11/01/92(R)
01/16/01
11/16/87(R)
01/01/92(R)
09/30/80(R)
08/30/00
08/24/82(R)
01/06/88(R)
07/28/99(R)
08/24/82(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/01/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/87(L)
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
06/11/76
(NSFHA)
04/01/81
02/09/00
08/23/00
12/19/97
04/01/87(L)
01/03/90
06/01/88(L)
01/03/90
07/17/95
11/16/95
(NSFHA)
10/20/98
09/22/99
11/15/85
09/10/87(L)
11/01/89(L)
04/15/94
03/30/98
11/06/96
03/30/98
09/17/92
04/20/82(M)
08/17/81
09/30/81
11/16/90
04/01/87(L)
11/01/92(L)
(NSFHA)
01/01/92(L)
09/30/80
08/24/82(M)
03/30/98
01/06/99
08/24/82(M)
08/23/00
09/01/87(L)
08/03/81
08/02/94
Page 5 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481279#
480493#
481101#
480164#
480165#
480171#
481013#
480069#
480445A
480953A
481593#
480440#
480152B
480678#
48029 1#
48063 1#
480362A
480259#
480774#
480194#
480682#
480426B
480172#
480690#
481171#
480008#
480198
481569#
480237
480789#
480118A
480336B
481516#
480507#
480219B
481502
480173#
480202#
480146#
48047 1#
480088A
480895A
480793#
480204#
481145A
480796#
480809
480337
480763A
480592#
Community Name
CUT 'N SHOOT, CITY OF
DAINGERFIELD, CITY OF
DAISETTA,CITY OF
DALHART, CITY OF
DALLAS COUNTY *
DALLAS, CITY OF
Includes the Cities of Renner and Kleberg
DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS, TOWN OF
DANBURY, CITY OF
DARROUZETT, TOWN OF
DAWSON, CITY OF
DAYTON LAKES, CITY OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DE LEON, CITY OF
DECATUR, CITY OF
DEER PARK, CITY OF
DEL RIO, CITY OF
DELL CITY, CITY OF
DENISON, CITY OF
DENTON COUNTY*
DENTON, CITY OF
DENVER CITY, CITY OF
DEPORT, CITY OF
DESOTO, CITY OF
DEVINE, CITY OF
DEWITT COUNTY*
DIBOLL, CITY OF
DICKENS COUNTY
DICKINSON, CITY OF
DILLEY, CITY OF
DIMMIT COUNTY*
DIMMITT, CITY OF
DONNA, CITY OF
DOUBLE OAK, TOWN OF
DRISCOLL, CITY OF
DUBLIN, CITY OF
DUMAS, CITY OF
DUNCANVILLE, CITY OF
DUVAL COUNTY*
EAGLE LAKE, CITY OF
EAGLE PASS, CITY OF
EARLY, CITY OF
EARTH, CITY OF
EASTLAND COUNTY*
EASTLAND,CITY OF
EASTON, VILLAGE OF
ECTOR COUNTY*
ECTOR, CITY OF
EDCOUCH, CITY OF
EDEN, VILLAGE OF
EDGECLIFF VILLAGE, TOWN OF
County
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
DALLAM COUNTY
HARTLEY COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
LIPSCOMB COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
COMANCHE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
VAL VERDE COUNTY
HUDSPETH COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
YOAKUM COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
DEWITT COUNTY
ANGELINA COUNTY
DICKENS COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
FRIO COUNTY
DIMMIT COUNTY
CASTRO COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
ERATH COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
COLORADO COUNTY
MAVERICK COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
ECTOR COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
CONCHO COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/22/88(R)
12/07/82(R)
06/15/82(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/19/82(R)
03/16/83(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/16/81(R)
02/15/85(R)
08/22/78(R)
11/15/89(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/16/77(R)
08/15/80(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/01/87(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/04/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/28/82(R)
05/05/81(R)
04/15/77(R)
05/01/87(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
01/04/01
04/09/7 1(R)
02/01/88(R)
06/11/97
04/01/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/04/87(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/08/78(R)
10/31/00
04/1 5/8 1(R)
05/01/87(R)
04/01/87(R)
06/01/81(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/30/97
08/01/87(R)
12/01/89(R)
03/04/9 1(R)
04/26/95
05/25/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
08/19/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/22/99
12/07/82(M)
04/03/87
02/06/91
1 1/20/96
06/05/97
08/23/00
09/22/99
02/15/85(M)
08/22/78(M)
11/15/89
09/30/88
09/04/85(M)
03/19/90
04/20/00
08/15/90
07/01/87(L)
05/18/92
03/30/98
03/30/98
07/17/89
09/28/82(M)
04/17/84
04/15/77
05/01/87(L)
02/06/91
03/04/91
02/01/88(L)
01/31/78
04/01/87(L)
06/19/85(M)
03/30/98
07/16/81
04/01/81(M)
11/19/87
05/01/87(L)
01/03/90
06/01/81
07/01/87(L)
07/18/85(M)
11/15/77
08/05/97
12/01/89(L)
10/20/98
07/11/75
(NSFHA)
09/04/85(M)
08/23/00
Page 6 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480338#
485465#
480653#
485466#
480212#
4802 14#
480659
480023#
480002B
480798#
480339
481634#
480207#
480218#
480593#
480594#
481644#
481675#
Community Name
EDINBURG,CITY OF
EDNA, CITY OF
EL CAMPO, CITY OF
EL LAGO, CITY OF
EL PASO COUNTY *
EL PASO, CITY OF
ELECTRA, CITY OF
ELGIN, CITY OF
ELKHART, TOWN OF
ELLIS COUNTY*
ELSA, CITY OF
ENCHANTED OAKS, TOWN OF
ENNIS, CITY OF
ERATH COUNTY*
EULESS, CITY OF
EVERMAN, CITY OF
FAIR OAKS RANCH, CITY OF
FAIRCHILDS, VILLAGE OF
County
HIDALGO COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WHARTON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
BASTROP COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
ERATH COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/02/77(R)
11/12/71(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/02/7 1(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
10/15/82(R)
08/03/84(R)
07/01/88(R)
06/25/76(R)
08/19/87(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/15/82(R)
03/02/00
04/03/85(R)
09/17/80(R)
12/20/93(R)
05/28/96(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/06/00
07/05/82
03/01/83
04/20/00
09/04/91
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
12/08/98
06/25/76(M)
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
08/17/98
01/20/99
12/27/77
08/23/00
08/23/00
04/20/00
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM
480823A
481069#
480086#
480404B
480174#
481627#
480972
481565#
480815#
481076#
481583#
481102A
480669#
48067 1#
480777#
480817#
480226B
480595#
480410B
480228#
481485#
481594#
481272#
481590#
481570#
481601#
481520#
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWN OF
FALFURRIAS, CITY OF
FALLS CITY, CITY OF
FARMERS BRANCH, CITY OF
FARMERSVILLE, CITY OF
FARWELL, CITY OF
FAYETTE CO. W.C.& I.D.-MONUMENT HILL
FAYETTE COUNTY*
FERRIS, CITY OF
FIRST COLONY L.I.D.
FLATONIA, TOWN OF
FLORENCE, CITY OF
FLORESVILLE, CITY OF
FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF
FLOYD COUNTY*
FLOYDADA, CITY OF
FOREST HILL, CITY OF
FORNEY, CITY OF
FORT BEND COUNTY *
FORT BEND COUNTY L.I.D. #2
FORT BEND COUNTY L.I.D. #7
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #2
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #23
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #25
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #30
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #34
FREESTONE COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
BROOKS COUNTY
KARNES COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
FARMER COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
03/01/90(R)
11/01/79(R)
08/17/81(R)
03/04/86(R)
02/15/78(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
03/28/01
07/03/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
08/22/78(R)
11/19/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
11/16/77(R)
09/18/86(R)
01/04/01
11/01/89(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/08/78(R)
03/19/87(R)
02/15/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
11/15/84(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/04/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/01/90(L)
12/19/97
08/17/81
03/04/86(M)
08/02/90
12/19/97
07/03/85(M)
06/01/87(L)
01/20/99
04/20/00
06/19/85(M)
01/03/97
11/16/77
03/30/98
05/17/77
11/01/89(L)
08/23/00
08/08/78(M)
04/20/00
04/20/00
04/20/00
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
04/20/00
(NSFHA)
04/20/00
Page 7 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481519#
481591#
481605#
481600#
481647
480525#
480596#
480235#
480990#
480252#
485467#
485468#
481172
480523B
480134#
480954A
481041A
481488#
480012#
481219
480154#
480293#
485470#
485469#
480381#
480148#
481608#
485471#
481220
480156#
480448A
480668#
480435A
480696#
480625B
480262#
480574#
481265#
480827
480828#
480253#
480254#
48 1070 A
481103
480685#
480357#
485472#
Community Name
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #35
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #41
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #42
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM.
FORT BEND COUNTY M.U.D. #81
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM.
FORT GATES, CITY OF
FORT STOCKTON, CITY OF
FORT WORTH, CITY OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
FREDERICKSBURG, CITY OF
FREEPORT, CITY OF
FRIENDSWOOD, CITY OF
FRIO COUNTY
FRIONA, CITY OF
FRISCO, CITY OF
FROST, TOWN OF
FRUITY ALE, CITY OF
FULSHEAR, CITY OF
FULTON, CITY OF
USE THE ARANSAS COUNTY [485452] FIRM
GAINES COUNTY *
GAINESVILLE, CITY OF
GALENA PARK, CITY OF
GALVESTON COUNTY*
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF CRYSTAL BEACH
GALVESTON, CITY OF
GANADO, CITY OF
GARDEN RIDGE, CITY OF
GARFIELD, VILLAGE OF
GARLAND, CITY OF
GARZA COUNTY *
GATESVILLE, CITY OF
GEORGE WEST, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF
GIDDINGS, CITY OF
GILLESPIE COUNTY*
GILMER, CITY OF
GLADEWATER, CITY OF
GLEN ROSE, CITY OF
GLENN HEIGHTS, CITY OF
GOLIAD COUNTY
GOLIAD, CITY OF
GONZALES COUNTY *
GONZALES, CITY OF
GOODRICH, CITY OF
GORMAN, CITY OF
GRAHAM, CITY OF
GRANBURY, CITY OF
GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF
County
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
COR YELL COUNTY
PECOS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
GILLESPIE COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
FRIO COUNTY
FARMER COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
ARANSAS COUNTY
GAINES COUNTY
COOKE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
GARZA COUNTY
COR YELL COUNTY
LIVE OAK COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
GILLESPIE COUNTY
UPSHUR COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
SOMERVELL COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
GOLIAD COUNTY
GOLIAD COUNTY
GONZALES COUNTY
GONZALES COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
YOUNG COUNTY
HOOD COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
05/11/87(R)
08/05/86(R)
03/02/93
11/01/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/28/00
07/06/82(R)
05/19/81(R)
11/13/70(R)
03/03/72(R)
09/30/97
06/05/85(R)
06/18/80(R)
08/08/78(R)
11/01/89(R)
07/31/81(R)
02/27/87(R)
04/19/89
10/15/81(R)
1 1/02/82(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
05/07/71(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/30/86(R)
04/01/82(R)
04/16/71(R)
03/28/01
09/30/8 1(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/01/87(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/16/81(R)
05/25/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
04/19/96
08/19/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/25/78(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
01/15/88(R)
07/06/73(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/20/00
04/20/00
09/30/92
04/20/00
11/01/85(M)
08/23/00
07/06/82(M)
05/19/81
09/22/99
09/22/99
06/05/85(M)
12/19/97
08/08/78(M)
11/01/89(L)
04/20/00
10/15/81
04/20/00
07/05/93
05/04/92
09/28/79
04/30/86
07/19/93
09/30/81
08/01/87(L)
01/03/97
09/01/87(L)
05/01/87(L)
11/01/85(M)
01/16/81
04/03/95
07/16/80
08/19/86
11/20/98
06/15/79
06/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
01/02/91
05/16/94
1 1/20/96
Page 8 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480634B
480643A
481046#
481149#
480873
480598#
481222
480829#
485473#
48026 1#
480555#
480039#
481173#
480912A
480726A
485475#
481032A
480266#
480328#
480832#
481607#
481223#
480276
485476D
480599#
480281#
480402A
481224
481011
480284#
481270
480029#
485477#
480287#
480847#
48085 1#
480320#
480600#
480885A
480321#
480542#
480545#
480294#
481643#
480997#
481045#
481174#
480551#
480126#
480192
Community Name
GRAND SALINE, CITY OF
GRANDFALLS, CITY OF
GRANGER, CITY OF
GRANITE SHOALS, CITY OF
GRAPELAND, TOWN OF
GRAPEVINE, CITY OF
GRAY COUNTY *
GRAYSON COUNTY*
GREENVILLE, CITY OF
GREGG COUNTY *
GREGORY, CITY OF
GREY FOREST, CITY OF
GRIMES COUNTY *
GROESBECK, CITY OF
GROOM, CITY OF
GROVES, CITY OF
GROVETON, CITY OF
GUADALUPE COUNTY *
GUN BARREL, CITY OF
GUNTER, TOWN OF
HACKBERRY, TOWN OF
HALE COUNTY*
HALL COUNTY
HALLETSVILLE, CITY OF
HALTOM CITY, CITY OF
HAMILTON, CITY OF
HAMLIN, CITY OF
HANSFORD COUNTY
HAPPY, CITY OF
HARDIN COUNTY *
HARDIN, CITY OF
HARKER HEIGHTS, CITY OF
HARLINGEN, CITY OF
HARRIS COUNTY*
HARRISON COUNTY*
HASKELL COUNTY *
HASKELL,CITY OF
HASLET, CITY OF
HAWLEY, TOWN OF
HAYS COUNTY*
HEARNE, CITY OF
HEATH, CITY OF
HEDWIG VILLAGE, CITY OF
HELOTES, CITY OF
HEMPHILL, CITY OF
HEMPSTEAD, TOWN OF
HENDERSON COUNTY*
HENDERSON, CITY OF
HENRIETTA, CITY OF
HEREFORD, CITY OF
County
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
GRAY COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
GRIMES COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
CARSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
TRINITY COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
HALE COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
LAVACA COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
FISHER COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
HANSFORD COUNTY
SWISHER COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
SABINE COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
DEAF SMITH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 l/23/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
11/16/90(R)
03/15/01
11/17/82(R)
02/05/01
05/18/92(R)
08/13/71(R)
01/03/90(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/01/88(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/13/70(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/14/94(R)
01/18/88(R)
04/02/97(R)
02/01/88(R)
07/28/00
07/07/72(R)
02/01/78(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/30/00
01/16/01
09/29/78(R)
04/09/85(R)
08/03/81(R)
06/23/72(R)
05/26/70(R)
11/01/89(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/18/87(R)
10/15/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/16/93(R)
08/19/86(R)
02/01/80(R)
05/26/78(R)
10/28/98(R)
09/18/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
02/04/87(R)
06/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 l/23/82(M)
08/01/87(L)
01/03/97
11/16/90
11/19/76
08/23/00
07/17/95
10/20/98
01/03/90
04/15/81
07/16/80
08/01/88(L)
10/15/85(M)
06/19/85(M)
01/06/83
06/19/85(M)
1 1/20/98
08/17/98
07/17/95
(NSFHA)
02/01/88(L)
02/02/79
08/23/00
09/04/91
07/01/87(L)
02/14/75
04/17/96
(NSFHA)
08/03/81
08/03/81
04/20/00
11/01/89(L)
10/15/85(M)
09/18/87
08/23/00
07/01/87(L)
02/18/98
08/19/86
02/01/80
(NSFHA)
02/16/96
09/18/79(M)
06/15/81
08/17/98
09/27/91
04/02/91
06/01/88(L)
Page 9 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480458#
481150#
480843
480334#
480340B
481503
481676
480178#
481105#
481106#
485478#
48035 1#
480295#
485479#
480352#
485517#
480030#
480699A
480040#
480474#
480356#
480056A
480869#
480872#
480296#
481227#
480833#
480859A
480361#
480734A
480297#
480363#
480298#
480639#
48060 1#
480179#
480916
481645
Community Name
HEWITT,CITY OF
HICKORY CREEK, TOWN OF
HICO, CITY OF
HIDALGO COUNTY *
HIDALGO, TOWN OF
HIGGINS, CITY OF
HIGHLAND HAVEN, CITY OF
USE BURNET COUNTY (481209) FIRM DATED 11-16-90
PANEL 284.
HIGHLAND PARK, TOWN OF
HIGHLAND VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE, TOWN OF
HILLCREST VILLAGE, CITY OF
HILLSBORO, CITY OF
HILSHIRE VILLAGE, CITY OF
HITCHCOCK, CITY OF
HOCKLEY COUNTY*
HOLIDAY LAKES, TOWN OF
HOLLAND, CITY OF
HOLLIDAY, CITY OF
HOLLYWOOD PARK, TOWN OF
HONDO, CITY OF
HOOD COUNTY*
HOOKS,CITY OF
HOPKINS COUNTY*
HOUSTON COUNTY*
HOUSTON, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE HARRIS COUNTY WATER CONTROL
DISTRICT #93; CHERRY HILL MUD; CHIMNEY ROCK
MUD; BURLINGTON COLONY MUD; COURT ROAD
MUD
INCLUDES THE HARRIS COUNTY WATER CONTROL
DISTRICT #93; CHERRY HILL MUD; CHIMNEY ROCK
MUD; BURLINGTON COLONY MUD; COURT ROAD
MUD
INCLUDES THE HARRIS COUNTY WATER CONTROL
DISTRICT #93; CHERRY HILL MUD; CHIMNEY ROCK
MUD; BURLINGTON COLONY MUD; COURT ROAD
MUD
HOWARD COUNTY*
HOWE, TOWN OF
HUBBARD, CITY OF
HUDSPETH COUNTY *
HUGHES SPRINGS, CITY OF
HUMBLE, CITY OF
HUNT COUNTY*
HUNTER'S CREEK VILLAGE, CITY OF
HUNTSVILLE, CITY OF
HURST, CITY OF
HUTCHINS, CITY OF
IDALOU, TOWN OF
INGLESIDE ON THE BAY, CITY OF
USE THE SAN PATRICIO COUNTY [485506] FIRM.
County
MCLENNAN COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
HAMILTON COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
LIPSCOMB COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
HOOD COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HOWARD COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
HUDSPETH COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/78(R)
03/01/91(R)
03/15/01
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/01/92(R)
02/05/01
09/23/96(R)
07/16/79(R)
07/16/87(R)
0 1/04/0 1(R)
03/17/72(R)
09/30/80(R)
06/28/79(R)
11/13/70(R)
04/11/00
01/12/84(R)
08/03/81(R)
11/01/89(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/01/78(R)
10/18/88(R)
04/01/87(R)
03/06/01
07/02/93
12/11/79(R)
02/01/88(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/01/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
01/01/92(R)
09/16/82(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
10/15/85(R)
05/01/80(R)
06/01/88(R)
05/11/92(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/01/78
03/30/98
08/22/75
06/06/00
01/01/92(L)
07/16/79
03/30/98
08/23/77
09/22/99
09/30/80
04/20/00
04/04/83
10/25/77
09/22/99
08/03/81
11/01/89(L)
02/16/96
12/01/78
09/05/90
04/01/87(L)
12/27/77
11/01/77
04/20/00
02/01/88(L)
07/17/95
05/01/85(M)
11/01/85(M)
01/01/92(L)
04/20/00
10/20/98
04/20/00
05/07/01
08/23/00
05/01/80
06/01/88(L)
Page 10 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
485480#
481592#
481071#
480660#
480973A
48 1072 A
480180#
480860#
480299#
480377
480378#
480379#
480123#
481271#
481080B
480383#
481690
481251#
480385#
480465#
480300#
480906
481081#
481258#
481005A
480712#
480879#
480884
480072#
481597#
480756#
480882#
480703#
48042 1#
480778#
480405A
481175#
480301#
48041 1#
480407B
481107#
480602#
485481#
480412#
481689
480417#
481230#
485482#
480603#
481231
480955
Community Name
INGLESIDE, CITY OF
INGRAM, CITY OF
IOWA COLONY, TOWN OF
IOWA PARK, CITY OF
IRAAN, TOWN OF
IREDELL, TOWN OF
IRVING, CITY OF
ITASCA, CITY OF
JACINTO CITY, CITY OF
JACK COUNTY*
JACKSBORO, CITY OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF
JAMAICA BEACH, VILLAGE OF
JASPER COUNTY*
JASPER, CITY OF
JAYTON, CITY OF
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY *
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JEFFERSON, CITY OF
JERSEY VILLAGE, CITY OF
JEWETT, CITY OF
JIM HOGG COUNTY*
JIM WELLS COUNTY *
JOAQUIN, CITY OF
JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF
JOHNSON COUNTY*
JONES COUNTY
JONES CREEK, VILLAGE OF
JONESTOWN, CITY OF
JOSEPHINE, CITY OF
JOSHUA, CITY OF
JOURDANTON, CITY OF
JUNCTION, CITY OF
JUSTIN, CITY OF
KARNES CITY, CITY OF
KARNES COUNTY*
KATY, CITY OF
KAUFMAN COUNTY *
KAUFMAN, CITY OF
KEENE, CITY OF
KELLER, CITY OF
KEMAH, CITY OF
KEMP, CITY OF
KEMPNER, CITY OF
480899 0250 B (Lampasas County)
KENDALL COUNTY *
KENEDY COUNTY *
KENEDY, CITY OF
KENNEDALE, CITY OF
KENT COUNTY *
KERENS, CITY OF
County
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
KERR COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
PECOS COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
JACK COUNTY
JACK COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
JIM HOGG COUNTY
JIM WELLS COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
BLANCO COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
KIMBLE COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
KARNES COUNTY
KARNES COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
LAMPASAS COUNTY
KENDALL COUNTY
KENEDY COUNTY
KARNES COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
KENT COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/25/7 1(R)
05/01/79(R)
05/17/82(R)
12/15/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
11/01/92(R)
11/19/80(R)
07/06/82(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
06/30/98
01/15/88(R)
08/15/78(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
04/08/7 1(R)
04/01/91(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
01/16/01
07/18/85(R)
06/01/83(R)
10/26/82(R)
03/15/82(R)
02/05/01
11/01/87(R)
05/02/83(R)
07/18/85(R)
03/01/86(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/15/00
06/05/85(R)
04/01/82(R)
12/15/95(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/18/85(R)
09/26/79(R)
04/02/97(R)
08/01/86(R)
04/12/99
03/02/8 1(R)
09/04/9 1(R)
08/08/78(R)
02/21/01(R)
09/30/82(R)
10/16/70(R)
09/16/80(R)
08/14/00(R)
06/17/86(R)
04/03/84(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
11/15/84(R)
01/04/01
05/25/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/18/85
07/19/00
09/22/99
12/15/82
06/05/85(M)
11/01/92(L)
09/30/93
07/06/82(M)
04/20/00
01/15/88
06/19/85
02/18/81
04/04/83
04/01/91(L)
05/18/92
07/18/85(M)
04/02/92
10/26/82(M)
04/20/00
12/24/76
11/01/87(L)
05/02/83
07/18/85(M)
02/06/91
01/06/99
09/22/99
01/19/00
10/20/98
01/06/99
07/18/85(M)
11/05/97
03/30/98
08/01/86(L)
06/07/77
02/08/83
09/06/95
08/08/78(M)
01/06/99
08/23/00
04/04/83
09/03/80
07/17/95
05/04/92
06/18/90
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
Page 11 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480419#
480420#
480263#
48003 1#
481232#
481233
481567#
480424#
481176#
48004 1#
480384#
480423#
480890B
481151#
480845#
481661#
480779#
481108#
480106
480223A
480576A
480341#
485486#
485487#
481050#
480342#
480475#
480927#
481588#
485483#
481616#
480780#
485484#
481577#
481259#
480605#
481496#
480604#
481303#
480893
480191#
480899#
480430#
480182#
48065 1#
481178#
481313#
481074#
485488#
480980B
481536#
480256A
480903
Community Name
KERR COUNTY*
KERRVILLE, CITY OF
KILGORE, CITY OF
KILLEEN, CITY OF
KIMBLE COUNTY *
KING COUNTY *
KINGSBRIDGE M.U.D.
KINGSVILLE, CITY OF
KINNEY COUNTY *
KIRBY, CITY OF
KIRBYVILLE, CITY OF
KLEBERG COUNTY *
KNOX CITY, CITY OF
KOSSE, TOWN OF
KOUNTZE, CITY OF
KRUGERVILLE, CITY OF
KRUM, CITY OF
KYLE, CITY OF
LA FERIA, CITY OF
LA GRANGE,CITY OF
LA GRULLA, CITY OF
LA JOY A, CITY OF
LA MARQUE, CITY OF
LA PORTE, CITY OF
LA VERNIA, CITY OF
LA VILLA, CITY OF
LACOSTE, CITY OF
LACY-LAKEVIEW, CITY OF
LAGO VISTA, CITY OF
LAGUNA VISTA, VILLAGE OF
LAKE BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
LAKE DALLAS, CITY OF
LAKE JACKSON, CITY OF
LAKE RANSOM CANYON, VILLAGE OF
LAKE TANGLEWOOD, VILLAGE OF
LAKE WORTH, CITY OF
LAKESIDE CITY, CITY OF
LAKESIDE, CITY OF
LAKEWAY, CITY OF
LAMB COUNTY
LAMESA, CITY OF
LAMPASAS COUNTY *
LAMPASAS, CITY OF
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LAREDO, CITY OF
LAVACA COUNTY*
LAVON, TOWN OF
LAWARD, CITY OF
LEAGUE CITY, CITY OF
LEAKEY, CITY OF
LEANDER, CITY OF
LEFORS,CITY OF
LEON COUNTY
County
KERR COUNTY
KERR COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
KIMBLE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
KLEBERG COUNTY
KINNEY COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
JASPER COUNTY
KLEBERG COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
STARR COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
DAWSON COUNTY
LAMPASAS COUNTY
LAMPASAS COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WEBB COUNTY
LAVACA COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
REAL COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
GRAY COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/79(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
08/03/81(R)
01/04/01
03/28/0 1(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/26/7 1(R)
10/15/85(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/18/86(R)
08/13/71(R)
11/01/89(R)
07/06/82(R)
11/01/89(R)
06/06/00(R)
09/23/96(R)
12/12/78(R)
08/03/84(R)
04/01/87(R)
01/03/86(R)
07/16/79(R)
10/16/70(R)
02/12/71(R)
05/01/78(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/09/79(R)
04/01/82(R)
07/21/72(R)
10/09/90(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/07/72(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/30/82(R)
01/06/93(R)
04/01/91(R)
08/03/84(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
06/15/00
04/30/76(R)
0 1/02/9 1(R)
06/15/82(R)
08/03/81(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/13/91(R)
09/28/79(R)
1 1/20/70(R)
11/01/89(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/01/87(R)
1 1/24/95
Current Effective
Map
07/19/00
07/19/00
08/16/96
05/04/00
01/15/82
04/20/00
08/17/81
10/15/85(M)
02/02/96
09/18/86
05/04/92
11/01/89(L)
07/06/82(M)
04/17/96
(NSFHA)
03/30/98
02/18/98
(NSFHA)
04/01/87(L)
01/03/86(M)
07/16/79
02/16/83
04/20/00
05/01/78
06/15/78
05/01/79
10/09/79(M)
01/19/00
09/15/83
03/19/90
03/30/98
09/22/99
11/01/85(M)
09/30/82
08/23/00
04/01/91(L)
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
02/06/91
01/02/91
06/15/82
09/05/84
05/17/82
09/01/87(L)
12/19/97
09/28/79
09/22/99
11/01/89(L)
01/19/00
08/01/87(L)
Page 12 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480042#
481314#
480354#
480195#
48043 8#
48044 1#
480910#
480735A
480766A
481152#
481579#
480429A
481179
480043#
480075#
480528A
481234#
48045 1#
480095#
480944
480264#
480928#
480160B
480108#
480874A
481235
481631#
480452#
481545#
480009#
480096#
481111#
480665#
480692#
480414B
481180#
480464#
481261#
480329#
480861A
481027#
480606#
480076#
480093#
481493
481630
480268B
480221 A
480319#
480929#
481236
481587#
Community Name
LEON VALLEY, CITY OF
LEROY, CITY OF
LEVELLAND, CITY OF
LEWISVILLE, CITY OF
LIBERTY COUNTY*
LIBERTY, CITY OF
LIMESTONE COUNTY*
LINDEN, TOWN OF
LINDSAY, TOWN OF
LITTLE ELM, TOWN OF
LITTLE RIVER- ACADEMY, CITY OF
LITTLEFIELD,CITY OF
LIVE OAK COUNTY
LIVE OAK, CITY OF
LIVERPOOL, CITY OF
LIVINGSTON, CITY OF
LLANO COUNTY *
LLANO, CITY OF
LOCKHART, CITY OF
LONE STAR, TOWN OF
LONGVIEW, CITY OF
LORENA, TOWN OF
LORENZO, CITY OF
LOS FRESNOS, CITY OF
LOVELADY, CITY OF
LOVING COUNTY *
LOWRY CROSSING, CITY OF
LUBBOCK, CITY OF
LUCAS, CITY OF
LUFKIN,CITY OF
LULING, CITY OF
LUMBERTON, CITY OF
LYFORD, CITY OF
LYTLE, CITY OF
MABANK, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY*
MADISONVILLE, CITY OF
MAGNOLIA, TOWN OF
MALAKOFF, CITY OF
MALONE, CITY OF
MANOR, CITY OF
MANSFIELD, CITY OF
MANVEL, TOWN OF
MARBLE FALLS, CITY OF
MARFA, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY*
MARION, CITY OF
MARLIN, CITY OF
MARSHALL, CITY OF
MART, CITY OF
MARTIN COUNTY *
MARTINDALE, TOWN OF
County
BEXAR COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
COOKE COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
LIVE OAK COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
LLANO COUNTY
LLANO COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
CROSBY COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
HOUSTON COUNTY
LOVING COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
ANGELINA COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
WILLACY COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
PRESIDIO COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
FALLS COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/01/77(R)
01/30/80(R)
08/02/90(R)
10/18/88(R)
09/30/88(R)
11/18/88(R)
06/01/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/01/87(R)
05/13/91(R)
05/01/84(R)
04/01/87(R)
05/17/96
05/16/77(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
05/04/82(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
03/24/98
12/15/77(R)
05/14/80(R)
08/24/82(R)
08/19/86(R)
03/01/91(R)
03/15/01
08/22/91(R)
09/02/82(R)
07/03/79(R)
06/01/82(R)
01/16/79(R)
05/08/79(R)
05/05/81(R)
02/02/77(R)
08/08/78(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
03/05/90(R)
01/03/85(R)
01/23/79(R)
12/01/89(R)
05/25/78(R)
12/18/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
11/16/90(R)
05/26/78(R)
05/25/89
01/03/86(R)
03/01/87(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/09/79(R)
09/22/88
11/16/83
Current Effective
Map
02/16/96
01/02/80
08/02/90
03/30/98
09/30/88
11/18/88
06/01/87(L)
06/19/85(M)
04/01/87(L)
03/30/98
05/01/84
04/01/87(L)
02/16/96
09/22/99
09/01/87(L)
09/18/91
05/04/82(M)
01/17/91
08/06/76
05/18/99
02/01/79
08/24/82
08/19/86(M)
03/01/91(L)
12/19/97
06/18/96
12/19/97
06/03/88
12/08/98
04/17/96
05/05/81
02/02/77
08/08/78(M)
09/27/91
03/05/90
09/22/99
08/17/98
12/01/89(L)
01/19/00
08/23/00
09/22/99
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
01/03/86(M)
03/01/87(L)
08/05/97
10/14/80
12/08/98
Page 13 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481237
480467#
485489#
480557#
480057B
480470#
480343#
480459#
480135#
480546
480456#
480463A
481613#
481563#
480472#
480700
480279#
481238#
480476#
480344#
480053A
480862A
480376A
485490#
480442#
481239#
480477#
480801#
480933
480992
480802#
480935
480517#
480518
481578#
480345#
480304#
480937#
480644
480122#
480939#
480483#
481483#
480930
480305#
480127#
480945
480433B
48062 1#
Community Name
MASON COUNTY *
MASON, CITY OF
MATAGORDA COUNTY *
MATHIS, CITY OF
MAUD, CITY OF
MAVERICK COUNTY*
MCALLEN, CITY OF
MCGREGOR, CITY OF
MCKINNEY, CITY OF
MCLENDON-CHISHOLM, CITY OF
MCLENNAN COUNTY
MCMULLEN COUNTY*
MEADOWLAKES, CITY OF
MEADOWS PLACE, CITY OF
MEDINA COUNTY *
MEGARGEL, TOWN OF
MEMPHIS, CITY OF
MENARD COUNTY*
MENARD, CITY OF
MERCEDES, CITY OF
MERIDIAN,CITY OF
MERTENS, TOWN OF
MERTZON, CITY OF
MESQUITE, CITY OF
MEXIA, CITY OF
MIDLAND COUNTY *
MIDLAND, CITY OF
MIDLOTHIAN, CITY OF
MILAM COUNTY
MILES, CITY OF
MILFORD, TOWN OF
MILLS COUNTY
MINERAL WELLS, CITY OF
MINGUS, CITY OF
MISSION BEND M.U.D. #1
MISSION, CITY OF
MISSOURI CITY, CITY OF
MITCHELL COUNTY *
MONAHANS, CITY OF
MONT BELVIEU, CITY OF
MONTAGUE COUNTY*
MONTGOMERY COUNTY*
MONTGOMERY, CITY OF
MOODY, TOWN OF
MORGANS POINT, CITY OF
MORTON, CITY OF
MOTLEY COUNTY
MOULTON,TOWN OF
MOUNT PLEASANT, CITY OF
County
MASON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MATAGORDA
COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
MAVERICK COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
MCMULLEN COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
MENARD COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
IRION COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
MIDLAND COUNTY
MIDLAND COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
MILAM COUNTY
RUNNELS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
PALO PINTO COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
PALO PINTO COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
MONTAGUE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
COCHRAN COUNTY
MOTLEY COUNTY
LAVACA COUNTY
TITUS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/01/00
07/02/79(R)
04/30/7 1(R)
10/23/79(R)
12/12/78(R)
09/23/96(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/01/79(R)
06/18/80(R)
02/21/97
09/16/81(R)
07/01/87(R)
11/16/90(R)
12/17/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
03/28/01
05/02/83(R)
09/04/87(R)
09/04/87(R)
07/16/79(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/01/91(R)
02/21/01
07/30/7 1(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
02/29/00
02/23/96
03/06/0 1(R)
04/28/92
12/01/77(R)
01/28/98
09/04/87(R)
08/15/79(R)
01/06/82(R)
05/15/85(R)
02/01/88(R)
08/16/82(R)
01/17/91(R)
08/01/84(R)
09/30/97(R)
03/28/01
12/01/83(R)
08/03/82(R)
05/03/01
03/04/86(R)
12/16/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/02/79
05/04/92
10/23/79(M)
12/12/78(M)
12/20/77(M)
1 1/02/82
02/01/79
12/19/97
09/26/75
09/02/81
07/01/87(L)
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
08/15/80
08/22/75
05/02/83
09/04/87
09/04/87
07/16/82
08/01/87(L)
03/01/91(L)
02/27/76
05/04/98
08/01/80
12/06/99
12/06/99
01/20/99
08/13/76
01/20/99
06/02/95
05/02/75
04/20/00
11/20/91
04/20/00
05/15/85(M)
02/01/88(L)
08/16/82
01/17/91
09/22/99
09/22/99
07/09/76
04/20/00
08/03/82(M)
03/04/86(M)
03/09/99
Page 14 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480821A
480767#
480019#
480330#
480137#
481687#
480947#
480497#
480494#
480058B
485491#
481112#
480950#
480265#
485492#
480820#
480059#
485493#
480920
480138#
481113A
481043
480499#
481114
480482#
481240#
480032#
481297#
480436#
480607#
481115A
480782#
485494#
480852
481672#
481639#
481560#
480437A
480558#
480206#
480769
481637#
481540#
480686#
480896A
Community Name
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MUENSTER, CITY OF
MULESHOE, CITY OF
MURCHISON, CITY OF
MURPHY, CITY OF
MUSTANG RIDGE, CITY OF
Adopted FIRM for Travis County, dated June 5, 1997- Panels
48453C, 0140E, 48453C-0145E, 48453C-0180E,
48453C-0185E and the FIRM for Caldwell County, dated July
21, 1999-Panel 480094-0025C.
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY*
NACOGDOCHES, CITY OF
NAPLES, CITY OF
NASH, CITY OF
NASSAU BAY, CITY OF
NATALIA, CITY OF
NAVARRO COUNTY*
NAVASOTA, CITY OF
NEDERLAND, CITY OF
NEEDVILLE, CITY OF
NEW BOSTON, CITY OF
NEW BRAUNFELS, CITY OF
NEW HOME, TOWN OF
NEW HOPE, CITY OF
NEW LONDON, CITY OF
NEW WAVERLY, CITY OF
NEWTON COUNTY*
NIXON, CITY OF
NOCONA, CITY OF
NOLAN COUNTY*
NOLANVILLE, CITY OF
NOME, CITY OF
NORMANGEE, CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF
NORTHCREST, TOWN OF
NORTHLAKE, TOWN OF
NUECES COUNTY*
O'BRIEN, CITY OF
OAK LEAF, CITY OF
OAK POINT, CITY OF
USE THE DENTON COUNTY [480774] FIRM.
OAK RIDGE NORTH, CITY OF
OAKWOOD, TOWN OF
ODEM, CITY OF
ODESSA, CITY OF
OGLESBY, CITY OF
OLD RIVER- WINFREE, CITY OF
OLMOS PARK, CITY OF
USE UTAH COUNTY (495517) FIRM PANELS 205 and 210.
OLNEY, CITY OF
OLTON, CITY OF
County
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COOKE COUNTY
BAILEY COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
TRAVIS
NACOGDOCHES
COUNTY
NACOGDOCHES
COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MEDINA COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
GRIMES COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
LYNN COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
GONZALES COUNTY
MONTAGUE COUNTY
NOLAN COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
ECTOR COUNTY
COR YELL COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
YOUNG COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/19/85(R)
06/05/85(R)
10/17/89(R)
05/18/82(R)
04/01/80(R)
06/15/00(R)
03/01/91(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
11/21/78(R)
06/21/77(R)
11/13/70(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/15/00
02/04/88(R)
11/13/70(R)
07/31/81(R)
11/21/78(R)
12/01/72(R)
12/04/00
04/19/96(R)
06/19/85(R)
11/17/94
04/01/87(R)
08/26/77(R)
11/21/78(R)
08/02/90(R)
06/01/81(R)
04/16/90(R)
07/06/82(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
09/30/94(R)
09/22/72(R)
02/05/01
09/15/00(R)
06/24/9 1(R)
12/18/84(R)
10/13/95
07/16/81(R)
03/04/9 1(R)
02/05/01
08/10/99(R)
05/28/99(R)
12/04/85(R)
02/01/91(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/19/85(M)
03/09/99
10/17/89
08/17/98
12/19/97
05/05/97
03/01/91(L)
02/18/81
11/21/78(M)
06/21/77(M)
04/20/00
04/15/80
12/27/77
02/04/88
06/03/91
04/20/00
11/21/78(M)
05/15/91
12/19/97
06/19/85(M)
06/25/76
09/21/98
(NSFHA)
01/17/91
08/02/90
06/01/81
02/02/83
07/06/82(M)
08/23/00
08/19/85(M)
03/30/98
05/04/92
07/25/75
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
09/22/99
02/06/76
12/14/82
12/06/99
11/12/76
02/17/93
02/16/96
01/02/91
02/01/91(L)
Page 15 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480974
481611#
480510#
480395
480512#
48 103 8 A
481155#
481255#
480771
485495#
480004#
481666#
Community Name
ONALASKA, CITY OF
OPDYKE WEST, TOWN OF
USE THE HOCKLEY COUNTY [480352] FHBM.
ORANGE COUNTY *
ORANGE GROVE, CITY OF
ORANGE, CITY OF
ORE CITY, CITY OF
OVILLA, CITY OF
OYSTER CREEK, VILLAGE OF
PADUCAH, CITY OF
PALACIOS, CITY OF
PALESTINE, CITY OF
PALISADES, VILLAGE OF
County
POLK COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
JIM WELLS COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
UPSHUR COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
COTTLE COUNTY
MATAGORDA
COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/06/96
04/14/88
01/06/83(R)
03/30/79(R)
01/06/83(R)
09/14/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
11/19/76(R)
08/24/81(R)
11/17/70(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
06/12/95(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/26/76
06/05/97
(NSFHA)
06/05/97
09/14/82(M)
01/20/99
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
02/05/86
03/01/84
USE THE RANDALL COUNTY [480532] FIRM
481580#
480209#
480516#
480258A
480727#
480966
481263#
481116#
480427#
480520#
480139#
480970
480307#
480486#
480077#
480238#
481486#
480538B
480745#
481028#
480347#
480783#
480697#
480513#
480998
480308#
480116B
480683A
480275#
480140#
PALM VALLEY, TOWN OF
USE THE CAMERON COUNTY (480101) FIRM DATED
6-15-79.
PALMER, CITY OF
PALO PINTO COUNTY *
PAMPA, CITY OF
PANHANDLE, TOWN OF
PANOLA COUNTY
PANORAMA VILLAGE, CITY OF
PANTEGO, TOWN OF
PARIS, CITY OF
PARKER COUNTY *
PARKER, CITY OF
FARMER COUNTY
PASADENA, CITY OF
PATTON VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
PEARLAND, CITY OF
PEARSALL, CITY OF
PECAN GROVE M.U.D.
PECOS, CITY OF
PETROLIA, CITY OF
PFLUGERVILLE, CITY OF
PHARR, CITY OF
PILOT POINT, TOWN OF
PINE FOREST, CITY OF
PINEHURST, CITY OF
PINELAND, TOWN OF
PINEY POINT VILLAGE, CITY OF
PITTSBURG, CITY OF
PLAINS,CITY OF
PLAINVIEW, CITY OF
PLANO, CITY OF
CAMERON COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
PALO PINTO COUNTY
GRAY COUNTY
CARSON COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
FARMER COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
FRIO COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
REEVES COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
SABINE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
CAMP COUNTY
YOAKUM COUNTY
HALE COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
09/08/82(R)
06/01/90(R)
12/19/84(R)
09/01/87(R)
05/11/82(R)
03/06/01
08/01/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
12/15/83(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/15/79(R)
01/16/01
07/02/71
04/15/85(R)
07/05/84(R)
05/19/81(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/19/85(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
05/01/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/11/01(R)
02/16/83(R)
01/06/83(R)
06/01/88(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/19/85(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/16/89(R)
01/02/80(R)
01/20/99
08/18/92
09/01/87(L)
05/11/82(M)
09/22/99
08/23/00
12/15/83
01/03/97
12/19/97
04/20/00
09/22/99
04/20/00
05/19/81
04/20/00
06/19/85(M)
04/02/91
01/19/00
10/19/82
03/30/98
02/16/83
01/06/83
06/01/88(L)
04/20/00
06/19/85(M)
08/01/87(L)
06/18/90
12/19/97
Page 16 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481615#
48066 1#
480015#
481269#
481528#
480098#
481156A
480526#
485498#
485499#
480109#
480099#
485500#
480559#
48025 IB
480016#
480672#
481622#
481544#
480396A
480530#
481651
481198
480757#
481677
480141#
480283B
481301#
480161
481646#
480532#
480205
480666#
480978#
481650#
485501#
480540#
481254A
480184#
480608#
48023 1#
485502#
481684
Community Name
PLEAK, VILLAGE OF
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM
PLEASANT VALLEY, CITY OF
PLEASANTON, CITY OF
PLUM GROVE,CITY OF
POINT BLANK, CITY OF
POINT COMFORT, CITY OF
POINT, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY*
PORT ARANSAS, CITY OF
PORT ARTHUR, CITY OF
INCLUDE THE TOWNS OF GRIFFIN PARK and
LAKEVIEW
PORT ISABEL, CITY OF
PORT LAVACA, CITY OF
PORT NECHES, CITY OF
PORTLAND, CITY OF
POST, CITY OF
POTEET, CITY OF
POTH, CITY OF
POTTSBORO, TOWN OF
PRAIRIE VIEW, TOWN OF
FREMONT, CITY OF
PRESIDIO COUNTY *
PRESIDIO, CITY OF
PRIMERA, TOWN OF
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PROGRESO, CITY OF
THE CITY OF PROGRESO HAS ADOTPED THE
HIDALGO COUNTY [480334] FIRM DATED 11-16-82
PANEL 0525.
PROSPER, TOWN OF
QUANAH, CITY OF
QUINT ANA, VILLAGE OF
RALLS, CITY OF
RANCHO VIEJO, TOWN OF
USE CAMERON COUNTY [480101] FIRM
RANDALL COUNTY *
RANGER, CITY OF
RAYMOND VILLE, CITY OF
REAL COUNTY *
RED OAK, CITY OF
REFUGIO COUNTY *
REFUGIO, TOWN OF
RENO, CITY OF
RICHARDSON, CITY OF
RICHLAND HILLS, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RICHWOOD, CITY OF
RIO BRAVO, CITY OF
THE CITY OF RIO BRAVO HAS ADOPTED THE WEBB
COUNTY (481059)FIRM DATED
5- 17-82 PANEL 850.
County
FORT BEND COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
SAN JACINTO
COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
RAINS COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
GARZA COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
JIM WELLS COUNTY
PRESIDIO COUNTY
PRESIDIO COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
CROSBY COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
WILLACY COUNTY
REAL COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
REFUGIO COUNTY
REFUGIO COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
WEBB COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/31/88(R)
01/06/83(R)
04/01/81(R)
07/16/87(R)
01/13/95
04/15/82(R)
04/17/85(R)
03/01/91(R)
06/25/7 1(R)
11/13/70(R)
10/06/76(R)
08/27/71(R)
11/13/70(R)
07/03/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
1 1/03/89(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/11/01(R)
04/08/87(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/28/93
10/29/82(R)
03/16/88(R)
04/03/97(R)
05/04/82(R)
08/24/82(R)
05/08/71(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/10/92(R)
09/30/82(R)
07/01/99(R)
05/05/81(R)
06/05/85(R)
05/24/93
1 0/22/7 1(R)
10/06/76(R)
09/28/82(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/16/77(R)
01/09/87(R)
07/28/72(R)
09/15/98(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/20/00
01/06/83
04/01/81
07/16/87
05/01/79
04/03/85
04/17/85(M)
03/01/91(L)
09/30/92
05/04/92
06/01/83
03/04/85
01/06/83
07/03/85
11/01/85(M)
1 1/03/89
12/01/77
07/17/95
04/15/82
09/01/87(L)
07/03/85(M)
(NSFHA)
12/19/97
12/19/97
08/24/82(M)
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
09/30/82
07/01/99(L)
01/05/89
06/05/85(M)
01/20/99
03/18/85
04/01/82
09/28/82(M)
07/02/91
08/23/00
04/20/00
09/22/99
Page 17 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481678
480112#
481159#
480795A
480609#
481044
480785#
480496A
480988#
480460#
485503#
480479B
485504#
481118A
480543#
480547#
480708#
481029#
480577
481538#
481558#
481061#
480846#
480232#
481317#
480224A
481048#
480185#
480428B
480548#
480854
481618#
481120A
480991
480993#
480124
480186#
480610#
480940#
480623#
480045#
481183#
480552B
480113#
481199#
480705#
Community Name
RIO GRANDE CITY, CITY OF
USE THE STARR COUNTY (480575) FIRM DATED
7-1-87.
RIO HONDO, TOWN OF
RIO VISTA, VILLAGE OF
RISING STAR, CITY OF
RIVER OAKS, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
ROANOKE, CITY OF
ROARING SPRINGS, CITY OF
ROBERTSON COUNTY*
ROBINSON, CITY OF
ROBSTOWN, CITY OF
ROCKDALE, CITY OF
ROCKPORT, CITY OF
ROCKSPRINGS, TOWN OF
ROCKWALL COUNTY*
ROCKWALL, CITY OF
ROGERS, CITY OF
ROLLINGWOOD, CITY OF
ROMA, CITY OF
ROMAN FOREST, TOWN OF
ROSCOE, CITY OF
ROSE CITY, CITY OF
ROSE HILL ACRES, CITY OF
ROSENBERG, CITY OF
ROSS, CITY OF
ROT AN, CITY OF
ROUND ROCK, CITY OF
ROWLETT, CITY OF
ROXTON, CITY OF
ROYSE CITY, CITY OF
RULE, TOWN OF
RUNAWAY BAY, CITY OF
RUNGE, TOWN OF
RUNNELS COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
RUSK, CITY OF
SACHSE, CITY OF
SAGINAW, CITY OF
SAINT JO, CITY OF
SAN ANGELO, CITY OF
SAN ANTONIO, CITY OF
SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY *
SAN AUGUSTINE, CITY OF
SAN BENITO, CITY OF
SAN DIEGO,CITY OF
SAN FELIPE, TOWN OF
County
STARR COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
EASTLAND COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
MOTLEY COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
NUECES COUNTY
MILAM COUNTY
ARANSAS COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
STARR COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
NOLAN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
FISHER COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
ROCKWELL COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
KARNES COUNTY
RUNNELS COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
MONTAGUE COUNTY
TOM GREEN COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
SAN AUGUSTINE
COUNTY
SAN AUGUSTINE
COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
DUVAL COUNTY
AUSTIN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/22/97(R)
06/01/81(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
10/31/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
06/28/00
04/02/97(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/27/97
01/17/79(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
02/27/84(R)
07/02/7 1(R)
02/01/91(R)
05/19/01(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
11/20/95
08/01/84(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/24/93(R)
04/15/77(R)
12/04/84(R)
01/06/93
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/01/78(R)
01/02/79(R)
07/16/80(R)
01/04/01
05/10/90(R)
12/01/89(R)
02/05/01
09/27/9 1(R)
06/01/88(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/17/80(R)
05/25/78(R)
05/16/77(R)
12/15/83(R)
08/01/88(R)
10/19/82(R)
05/05/81(R)
03/01/87(R)
01/03/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/01/81
(NSFHA)
10/31/78(M)
08/23/00
11/19/76
03/30/98
08/01/87(L)
06/03/77
01/17/79
05/01/85
02/27/84(M)
03/04/85
02/01/91(L)
09/17/80
06/16/92
09/30/81
01/19/00
06/04/76
09/22/99
09/30/88
01/06/83
04/17/96
04/20/00
05/30/78
08/01/87(L)
01/19/00
06/05/97
01/02/79(M)
07/16/80
03/19/90
12/01/89(L)
09/27/91
06/01/88(L)
09/01/78
08/23/00
(NSFHA)
03/02/94
02/16/96
08/01/88(L)
10/19/82(M)
01/19/82
02/03/93
06/16/99
Page 18 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480553#
480348
481305#
485505#
485506#
480667#
481184#
480563#
481285B
480786#
481562#
480114#
480813
480269#
480999
481134
485507#
480100#
480187#
480239A
4800 17#
485508#
480046#
480240A
480025B
481002#
481135#
480656
480047#
481256#
480554#
485509#
481136A
485510#
480285#
481564#
485511#
480453#
481185#
480024#
481001#
481658
481264#
Community Name
SAN JACINTO COUNTY*
SAN JUAN, CITY OF
SAN LEANNA, CITY OF
SAN MARCOS, CITY OF
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY *
SAN PERLITA, CITY OF
SAN SABA COUNTY*
SAN SABA, CITY OF
SANCTUARY, CITY OF
SANGER, CITY OF
SANTA FE, CITY OF
SANTA ROSA, CITY OF
SAVOY, CITY OF
SCHERTZ, CITY OF
SCHLEICHER COUNTY
SCHULENBURG, CITY OF
SEABROOK, CITY OF
SEADRIFT, CITY OF
SEAGOVILLE, CITY OF
SEAGRAVES, CITY OF
SEALY, CITY OF
SEGUIN, CITY OF
SELMA, CITY OF
SEMINOLE,CITY OF
SEYMOUR, CITY OF
SHACKELFORD COUNTY
SHADY SHORES, CITY OF
SHAMROCK, CITY OF
SHAVANO PARK, TOWN OF
SHENANDOAH, TOWN OF
SHEPHERD, CITY OF
SHERMAN, CITY OF
SHINER, CITY OF
SHOREACRES, CITY OF
SILSBEE, CITY OF
SIMONTON, VILLAGE OF
SINTON, CITY OF
SLATON, CITY OF
SMITH COUNTY *
SMITHVILLE, CITY OF
SNYDER, CITY OF
SOCORRO, CITY OF
USE THE EL PASO COUNTY [480212] FIRM PANEL
236-277
SOMERSET, CITY OF
County
SAN JACINTO
COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
WILLACY COUNTY
SAN SABA COUNTY
SAN SABA COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
COMAL COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
SCHLEICHER
COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
GAINES COUNTY
AUSTIN COUNTY
GUADALUPE
COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
GAINES COUNTY
BAYLOR COUNTY
SHACKELFORD
COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SAN JACINTO
COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
LAVACA COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
BASTROP COUNTY
SCURRY COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/01/87(R)
07/21/78(R)
03/11/80(R)
08/27/71(R)
1 1/26/7 1(R)
05/05/81(R)
05/01/87(R)
06/01/88(R)
11/01/89(R)
04/24/79(R)
04/09/7 1(R)
05/05/81(R)
08/26/77(R)
09/15/77(R)
01/04/01
01/05/00
04/23/7 1(R)
12/04/70(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/19/86(R)
01/17/90(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/01/87(R)
10/15/85(R)
06/19/85(R)
05/11/82(R)
12/26/85
09/03/80(R)
05/26/78(R)
05/18/82(R)
06/04/7 1(R)
07/18/85(R)
1 1/20/70(R)
05/01/78(R)
08/04/87(R)
03/26/7 1(R)
08/03/82(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/16/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
03/14/94(R)
02/16/96(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/01/87(L)
(NSFHA)
01/19/00
02/18/98
03/18/85
05/05/81
07/02/91
07/02/91
11/01/89(L)
03/30/98
10/18/83
05/05/81
(NSFHA)
07/17/95
06/25/76
04/20/00
03/18/85
06/15/81
02/19/86(M)
06/16/99
03/07/00
02/16/96
08/01/87(L)
10/15/85(M)
06/19/85(M)
03/30/98
10/22/76
02/16/96
09/22/99
05/18/82(M)
05/18/92
07/18/85(M)
04/20/00
04/17/96
04/20/00
07/16/81
08/03/82(M)
07/02/81
12/08/98
02/04/81
02/16/96
Page 19 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481186#
48009 1#
480580#
480286#
48031 1#
480612#
480115#
480312#
480282#
480488#
480313#
480897
480521#
480788
481132#
480233#
481296#
480403
480466
480575#
481244#
480220#
480579A
481245
480673#
481246
480965A
480234#
480358#
480355A
480188#
480492B
481531#
481127#
481266#
481247#
485512#
480502#
481010A
481506
480454C
480582#
480995A
481014#
485513#
480670#
480236
480034#
Community Name
SOMERVELL COUNTY*
SOMERVILLE, CITY OF
SONORA, CITY OF
SOUR LAKE, CITY OF
SOUTH HOUSTON,CITY OF
SOUTH LAKE, CITY OF
SOUTH PADRE ISLAND, TOWN OF
SOUTHSIDE PLACE, CITY OF
SPEARMAN, CITY OF
SPLENDORA, CITY OF
SPRING VALLEY, CITY OF
SPRINGLAKE, TOWN OF
SPRINGTOWN, CITY OF
SPUR, CITY OF
ST. HEDWIG, CITY OF
STAFFORD, CITY OF
STAGECOACH, CITY OF
STAMFORD, CITY OF
STANTON, CITY OF
STARR COUNTY*
STEPHENS COUNTY *
STEPHENVILLE, CITY OF
STERLING CITY, TOWN OF
STERLING COUNTY *
STOCKDALE, CITY OF
STONEWALL COUNTY *
STRAWN, CITY OF
SUGAR LAND, CITY OF
INCLUDES FT. BEND COUNTY WATER CONTROL and
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #4
SULPHUR SPRINGS, CITY OF
SUNDOWN, CITY OF
SUNNYVALE, TOWN OF
SUNRAY, CITY OF
SUNRISE BEACH VILLAGE, CITY OF
SUNSET VALLEY, CITY OF
SURFSIDE BEACH, VILLAGE OF
SUTTON COUNTY*
SWEENY, CITY OF
SWEETWATER, CITY OF
SWISHER COUNTY*
TAFT, CITY OF
TAHOKA, CITY OF
TARRANT COUNTY*
TATUM, CITY OF
TAYLOR COUNTY*
TAYLOR LAKE VILLAGE, CITY OF
TAYLOR, CITY OF
TEAGUE, CITY OF
TEMPLE, CITY OF
County
SOMERVELL COUNTY
BURLESON COUNTY
SUTTON COUNTY
HARDIN COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
CAMERON COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
HANSFORD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
DICKENS COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
STARR COUNTY
STEPHENS COUNTY
ERATH COUNTY
STERLING COUNTY
STERLING COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
STONEWALL
COUNTY
PALO PINTO COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
LLANO COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
SUTTON COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
NOLAN COUNTY
SWISHER COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
LYNN COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
FREESTONE COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/04/87(R)
06/04/90(R)
02/17/89(R)
10/28/77(R)
03/18/87(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/15/83(R)
02/11/76(R)
09/04/87(R)
02/27/87(R)
06/04/80(R)
02/05/01
12/18/85(R)
01/16/01
02/05/97(R)
03/01/82(R)
05/01/86(R)
05/25/78(R)
06/01/88(R)
07/01/87(R)
0 1/02/9 1(R)
07/05/77(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/06/00
03/01/78(R)
12/01/00
11/01/89(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
12/15/89(R)
08/01/87(R)
02/01/80(R)
01/03/86(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
03/01/79(R)
06/10/77(R)
09/01/87(R)
12/17/71(R)
05/05/81(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/11/95
10/15/85(R)
08/04/87(R)
04/17/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/13/70(R)
03/01/82(R)
10/28/77(R)
01/19/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/03/95
06/04/90
02/17/89
04/17/96
04/20/00
08/23/00
03/09/99
04/20/00
09/04/87
09/22/99
04/20/00
10/22/76
12/18/85
11/12/76
02/16/96
04/20/00
09/22/99
(NSFHA)
06/01/88(L)
07/01/87(L)
01/02/91
07/16/91
08/01/87(L)
03/01/78
11/01/89(L)
04/20/00
12/15/89
08/01/87(L)
02/01/80
01/03/86(M)
09/27/91
01/19/00
09/22/99
09/01/87(L)
09/22/99
06/19/89
07/01/87(L)
10/15/85(M)
08/23/00
04/17/85(M)
06/01/87(L)
04/20/00
01/03/97
(NSFHA)
01/03/85
Page 20 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
48 1006 A
480619#
480048#
480416#
481019#
480060#
485514#
481129
481581#
481642#
481632#
485515D
480693#
481585#
485518#
481007
481624#
480868
480622#
4803 15#
480539A
481026#
480814A
480333#
481031
481033A
481606#
480570A
480709#
480581
480280B
481017A
481034#
480571#
481559
480049#
480189#
481036A
481248
480629#
480630#
481187#
480054#
481620#
480163#
480636#
480883#
481652
480637#
480638#
480514#
48046 1#
480255#
Community Name
TENAHA, CITY OF
TERRELL COUNTY*
TERRELL HILLS, CITY OF
TERRELL, CITY OF
TERRY COUNTY*
TEXARKANA, CITY OF
TEXAS CITY, CITY OF
TEXLINE, CITY OF
THE COLONY, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF EASTVALE
THOMPSONS, TOWN OF
THRALL, CITY OF
THREE RIVERS, CITY OF
THROCKMORTON, CITY OF
TIKI ISLAND, VILLAGE OF
TIMBERCREEK CANYON, VILLAGE OF
TIMPSON, CITY OF
TIOGA, TOWN OF
TOLAR, TOWN OF
TOM GREEN COUNTY *
TOMBALL, CITY OF
TO YAH, CITY OF
TRAVIS COUNTY*
TRENTON, CITY OF
TRINIDAD, CITY OF
TRINITY COUNTY*
TRINITY, CITY OF
TROPHY CLUB, TOWN OF
TROUP, CITY OF
TROY, CITY OF
TULIA, CITY OF
TURKEY, CITY OF
TUSCOLA, TOWN OF
TYLER COUNTY*
TYLER, CITY OF
UNCERTAIN, TOWN OF
UNIVERSAL CITY, CITY OF
UNIVERSITY PARK, CITY OF
UPSHUR COUNTY*
UPTON COUNTY *
UVALDE COUNTY*
UVALDE, CITY OF
VAL VERDE COUNTY*
VALLEY MILLS, CITY OF
VAN ALSTYNE, TOWN OF
VAN HORN, TOWN OF
VAN, CITY OF
VENUS, TOWN OF
VERNON, CITY OF
VICTORIA COUNTY*
VICTORIA, CITY OF
VIDOR, CITY OF
WACO, CITY OF
WAELDER, CITY OF
County
SHELBY COUNTY
TERRELL COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
TERRY COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
DALLAM COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
LIVE OAK COUNTY
THROCKMORTON
COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
RANDALL COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
HOOD COUNTY
TOM GREEN COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
REEVES COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
TRINITY COUNTY
TRINITY COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
SWISHER COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
UPSHUR COUNTY
UPTON COUNTY
UVALDE COUNTY
UVALDE COUNTY
VAL VERDE COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
CULBERSON COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
WILBARGER COUNTY
VICTORIA COUNTY
VICTORIA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
GONZALES COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/03/85(R)
09/01/87(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/03/01
03/01/79(R)
1 1/20/70(R)
01/16/01
09/29/86(R)
09/30/92(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/1 8/7 1(R)
04/15/77(R)
04/15/83(R)
01/26/84(R)
01/26/83(R)
01/16/01(R)
02/15/00
08/03/92(R)
12/18/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/19/85(R)
01/16/79(R)
04/26/95
03/01/87(R)
06/12/87(R)
01/23/79(R)
06/01/81(R)
03/01/88(R)
02/15/85(R)
11/01/89(R)
10/01/91(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/21/79(R)
05/16/77(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/01/87(R)
07/23/91
08/04/87(R)
03/15/82(R)
06/01/87(R)
11/15/79(R)
11/11/94(R)
11/01/89(R)
ll/23/82(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/26/93
09/18/87(R)
07/23/7 1(R)
01/06/83(R)
11/02/77(R)
12/01/77(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/03/85(M)
09/01/87(L)
02/16/96
03/04/96
06/14/77
05/17/93
05/04/92
03/30/98
04/20/00
01/03/97
07/05/84
04/15/77
11/01/85
07/18/85
(NSFHA)
07/17/95
07/18/75
07/19/00
04/20/00
08/01/87(L)
01/19/00
06/19/85(M)
08/17/98
03/01/87(L)
03/30/98
01/23/79(M)
06/01/81
03/01/88(L)
02/15/85(M)
11/01/89(L)
10/01/91(L)
02/19/92
(NSFHA)
02/16/96
11/15/79
05/01/87(L)
08/16/96
08/16/96
06/01/87(L)
11/15/79
07/17/95
11/02/94
ll/23/82(M)
01/06/99
11/20/98
07/21/99
01/06/83
10/18/88
12/01/77
Page 21 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
48006 IB
481042#
480640#
48064 1#
480018#
480713A
480840A
481188#
480613#
48021 1#
480522#
481059#
485516#
481121#
481674#
480143#
480741 A
480349#
480081#
481602#
481030#
480515#
4803 18#
4806 14#
480758#
480615#
480616#
480652#
480654#
480657
480841A
4806 17#
480747
480572#
480839#
480865#
481189#
480662#
481190
480664#
481079#
480942#
481603#
Community Name
WAKE VILLAGE, CITY OF
WALKER COUNTY*
WALLER COUNTY*
WALLER, CITY OF
WALLIS, CITY OF
WALNUT SPRINGS, CITY OF
WARREN CITY, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WATAUGA, TOWN OF
WAXAHACHIE, CITY OF
WEATHERFORD, CITY OF
WEBB COUNTY*
WEBSTER, CITY OF
WEIMAR, CITY OF
WEIR, CITY OF
WELLINGTON, CITY OF
WELLS, CITY OF
WESLACO, CITY OF
WEST COLUMBIA, CITY OF
WEST KEEGANS BAYOU IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM AND
THE HARRIS COUNTY [480287] FIRM
USE THE FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM AND
THE HARRIS COUNTY [480287] FIRM
WEST LAKE HILLS, CITY OF
WEST ORANGE, CITY OF
WEST UNIVERSITY PLACE, CITY OF
WESTLAKE, TOWN OF
WESTMINSTER, TOWN OF
WESTOVER HILLS, TOWN OF
WESTWORTH VILLAGE, VILLAGE OF
WHARTON COUNTY*
WHARTON, CITY OF
WHEELER, CITY OF
WHITE OAK, TOWN OF
WHITE SETTLEMENT, CITY OF
WHITEFACE, CITY OF
WHITEHOUSE, CITY OF
WHITEWRIGHT, TOWN OF
WHITNEY, TOWN OF
WICHITA COUNTY*
WICHITA FALLS, CITY OF
WILBARGER COUNTY
WILLACY COUNTY *
WILLIAMSON COUNTY *
WILLIS, CITY OF
WILLOW FORK DRAINAGE DISTRICT
USE THE HARRIS COUNTY [480287] FIRM AND THE
FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM
County
BOWIE COUNTY
WALKER COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
AUSTIN COUNTY
BOSQUE COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
WEBB COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
COLORADO COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
COLLINGSWORTH
COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
HIDALGO COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
TRAVIS COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
WHARTON COUNTY
WHARTON COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
COCHRAN COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
WICHITA COUNTY
WILBARGER COUNTY
WILLACY COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/85(R)
05/01/87(R)
12/18/86(R)
09/14/79(R)
10/24/78(R)
12/01/89(R)
07/03/85(R)
01/16/01
06/01/82(R)
08/01/80(R)
08/05/86(R)
09/08/98(R)
05/19/72(R)
09/01/87(R)
04/19/96(R)
04/03/89(R)
06/01/91(R)
03/04/80(R)
12/15/83(R)
08/18/86(R)
07/17/78(R)
01/06/83(R)
05/26/78(R)
06/02/93(R)
05/10/93(R)
06/05/85(R)
06/03/86(R)
02/27/87(R)
09/16/82(R)
07/01/88(R)
12/01/89(R)
07/17/86(R)
02/05/01
02/13/79(R)
06/19/85(R)
02/16/90(R)
03/02/83(R)
10/16/79(R)
03/14/94
02/15/84(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
08/01/84(R)
09/08/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/85(M)
05/07/01
05/04/88
09/14/79
06/16/99
12/01/89(L)
07/03/85(M)
05/24/77
08/23/00
01/20/99
01/03/97
05/17/82
04/20/00
01/03/90
04/03/89
06/01/91(L)
03/04/80
09/22/99
04/20/00
01/19/00
01/06/83
04/20/00
03/30/98
12/19/97
08/23/00
08/23/00
04/18/83
09/16/82
07/01/88(L)
12/01/89(L)
08/23/00
02/13/79(M)
07/17/95
02/16/90
03/02/83
01/19/00
05/04/92
01/03/97
09/22/99
04/20/00
Page 22 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481164#
480633
480190#
480230#
480689#
480680#
480550
481051#
481055#
480694#
481641#
481168#
480987#
48 1022 A
481035A
480462#
480826A
480759#
481167A
480434A
480197A
480684#
481191#
Community Name
USE THE HARRIS COUNTY [480287] FIRM AND THE
FORT BEND COUNTY [480228] FIRM
WILLOW PARK, CITY OF
WILLS POINT, CITY OF
WILMER, CITY OF
WILSON COUNTY *
WINDCREST, CITY OF
WINNSBORO, CITY OF
WINTERS, CITY OF
WISE COUNTY*
WOOD COUNTY*
WOODBRANCH, VILLAGE OF
WOODCREEK, CITY OF
WOODLOCH, VILLAGE OF
WOODSBORO, TOWN OF
WOODSON, CITY OF
WOODVILLE, CITY OF
WOODWAY, CITY OF
WORTHAM, TOWN OF
WYLIE, CITY OF
YANTIS, CITY OF
YOAKUM, CITY OF
YORKTOWN, CITY OF
YOUNG COUNTY *
ZAVALA COUNTY*
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
PARKER COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
RUNNELS COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
REFUGIO COUNTY
THROCKMORTON
COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
FREESTONE COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
LAVACA COUNTY
DEWITT COUNTY
YOUNG COUNTY
ZAVALA COUNTY
1051
952
41
232
99
46
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/18/87(R)
03/01/88(R)
09/17/80(R)
03/15/78(R)
08/15/77(R)
12/07/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
03/19/90(R)
02/21/01
08/15/84(R)
06/02/93(R)
01/03/85(R)
07/16/81(R)
04/01/91(R)
10/26/82(R)
05/01/79(R)
09/04/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
10/26/82(R)
09/01/87(R)
03/01/87(R)
0 1/02/9 1(R)
09/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/03/97
03/01/88(L)
09/17/80
03/15/78
02/16/96
12/07/82(M)
(NSFHA)
03/19/90
05/31/77
09/22/99
02/18/98
09/22/99
07/16/81
04/01/91(L)
10/26/82(M)
05/01/79
09/04/85(M)
12/19/97
10/26/82(M)
09/01/87(L)
03/01/87(L)
01/02/91
09/01/87(L)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 23 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
CID
481089#
480960
481090
481546#
481306#
480894
481547#
481664#
481660#
480982
481085
481093
481561#
480731
480951
480642
480830#
480888
481541#
481609#
481088
480732
480984
481096
480398#
480325#
481302#
481640#
480904
480490A
480364#
481504#
481068
481550#
480730A
480905
480701
481140
481202
481543#
480702
480535
481098
--Not In
Community Name
"TEXAS
ADDISON, TOWN OF
ADRIAN, CITY OF
ALBA, TOWN OF
ALMA, TOWN OF
ALTOGA, CITY OF
AMHERST, CITY OF
ANGUS, TOWN OF
ANNETTA NORTH, TOWN OF
ANNETTA, TOWN OF
ANNONA, TOWN OF
APPLEBY, CITY OF
ASPERMONT, TOWN OF
AURORA, CITY OF
AVINGER, TOWN OF
BARRY, TOWN OF
BARSTOW, CITY OF
BELLS, TOWN OF
BENJAMIN, CITY OF
BERRYVILLE, CITY OF
BERTRAM, CITY OF
BLACKWELL, TOWN OF
BLOOMBURG, TOWN OF
BOGATA, TOWN OF
BREMOND, CITY OF
BRIAR OAKS, CITY OF
BROWNSBORO, CITY OF
BRUCEVILLE-EDDY, CITY OF
BUD A, CITY OF
BUFFALO, CITY OF
CACTUS, CITY OF
CADDO MILLS, CITY OF
CAMPBELL, TOWN OF
CAMPBELLTON, TOWN OF
CANEY CITY, CITY OF
CASS COUNTY*
CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
CHARLOTTE, CITY OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHILLICOTHE, CITY OF
CHIRENO, CITY OF
CHRISTINE, CITY OF
CLARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CLAUDE, CITY OF
The Program--
county
COLLIN COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
OLDHAM COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
LAMB COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
PARKER COUNTY
RED RIVER COUNTY
NACOGDOCHES
COUNTY
STONEWALL
COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
KNOX COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
BURNET COUNTY
NOLAN COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RED RIVER COUNTY
ROBERTSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
FALLS COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
HARDEMAN COUNTY
NACOGDOCHES
COUNTY
ATASCOSA COUNTY
GREGG COUNTY
ARMSTRONG
COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/16/80(F)
07/25/75
05/02/75
01/20/99(F)
04/02/9 1(F)
07/11/75
05/06/80
01/03/97(F)
01/03/97(F)
06/11/76
08/06/76
08/13/76
03/19/90(F)
08/06/76
07/30/76
06/25/76
05/18/92(F)
06/27/75
09/27/9 1(F)
11/16/90(F)
08/15/75
11/05/76
08/06/76
11/19/76(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
09/01/87(F)
06/18/80(F)
06/02/93(F)
08/20/76
06/14/74
09/04/9 1(F)
09/04/9 1(F)
06/25/76(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
07/05/77
03/13/76
08/06/76
08/13/76
07/18/75
07/03/79
07/11/75
07/11/75
08/13/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
10/29/77
07/25/76
09/01/82(W)
04/29/81
07/25/79
07/11/76
05/06/81
01/03/98
01/03/98
06/11/77
08/06/77
08/13/77
06/24/81
08/06/77
07/30/77
06/25/77
10/29/77
06/27/76
06/26/80
11/16/91
08/15/76
11/05/77
08/06/77
11/19/77
03/29/75
09/01/87(8)
05/02/79
06/02/94
08/20/77
06/14/75
06/28/75
04/10/80
06/25/77
06/17/81
07/05/78
03/13/77
08/06/77
08/13/77
07/18/76
07/03/80
07/11/76
07/11/76
08/13/77
Page 24 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481099
481507#
480408
480870
481510#
481511#
480158#
480723
480871
480985
481514#
480787
481515#
481309#
480733
480976
480635A
481146
481217#
481000
480710#
480277
480327#
480807#
480544
481147
480003
480822#
480875
480949
481148
481521#
480880#
481310#
480964
481104A
481522#
480848
480738
481669#
481495#
480857#
48 1277 A
481535#
481077
480373#
481047#
481294A
481551#
481523#
Community Name
COAHOMA, TOWN OF
COFFEE CITY, CITY OF
COMBINE, CITY OF
COMO, TOWN OF
COVE, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
CROCKETT COUNTY*
CROSS PLAINS, TOWN OF
CUMBY, CITY OF
DETROIT, TOWN OF
DEVERS, CITY OF
DICKENS, CITY OF
DOMINO, CITY OF
DORCHESTER, TOWN OF
DOUGLASVILLE, TOWN OF
EAST TAWAKONI, TOWN OF
EDGEWOOD, CITY OF
EDOM, CITY OF
EDWARDS COUNTY *
EL DORADO, TOWN OF
ELMENDORF, CITY OF
ESTELLINE, CITY OF
EUSTACE, CITY OF
FANNIN COUNTY*
FATE, CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, TOWN OF
FRANKSTON, CITY OF
FREESTONE COUNTY*
FRITCH, CITY OF
GARRISON, TOWN OF
GARY, TOWN OF
GHOLSON, CITY OF
GODLEY, TOWN OF
GOLINDA, CITY OF
GRAFORD, TOWN OF
GRUVER, CITY OF
HALLSBURG, CITY OF
HALLSVILLE, CITY OF
HART, CITY OF
HAYS, CITY OF
HEBRON, TOWN OF
HILL COUNTY*
HOMER, TOWN OF
HOWARDWICK, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON, CITY OF
HUTCHINSON COUNTY *
HUTTO, TOWN OF
IMPACT, TOWN OF
KENDLETON, TOWN OF
KENEFICK, TOWN OF
County
HOWARD COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
DALLAS COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
CHAMBERS COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
CROCKETT COUNTY
CALLAHAN COUNTY
HOPKINS COUNTY
RED RIVER COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
DICKENS COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
RAINS COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
EDWARDS COUNTY
SCHLEICHER
COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
ROCKWALL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
ANDERSON COUNTY
FREESTONE COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
NACOGDOCHES
COUNTY
PANOLA COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
PALO PINTO COUNTY
HANSFORD COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
CASTRO COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
DENTON COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
ANGELINA COUNTY
DONLEY COUNTY
ANGELINA COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
06/04/76
09/27/9 1(F)
07/02/76(F)
08/06/76
02/17/93(F)
04/17/79(F)
10/20/81
08/06/76
08/06/76
12/24/76(F)
04/24/79
08/06/76
07/10/79
07/17/95(F)
08/13/76(F)
11/05/76
06/14/74
08/13/76
02/19/82
08/13/76
09/03/80(F)
11/08/74
09/27/9 1(F)
11/08/77
11/05/76
08/06/76
06/01/88(F)
01/03/78
07/16/76
07/16/76
11/19/76
05/01/79
09/27/9 1(F)
06/06/78
07/11/75
02/15/85(F)
05/15/79
04/30/76
06/27/75
02/18/98(F)
12/05/90(F)
08/09/77
06/03/77
01/02/80
07/30/76
02/07/75
09/27/9 1(F)
06/10/77
09/30/92(F)
04/24/79
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
06/04/77
07/03/80
07/02/77
08/06/77
06/05/80
10/29/77
10/20/82
08/06/77
08/06/77
12/24/77
04/24/80
08/06/77
07/10/80
07/04/79
08/13/77
11/05/77
06/14/75
08/13/77
02/19/83
08/13/77
06/11/77
11/08/75
06/11/77
11/08/78
11/05/77
08/06/77
12/13/89(W)
01/03/79
07/16/77
07/16/77
11/19/77
05/01/80
08/22/76
06/06/79
09/01/82(W)
08/16/88(8)
05/15/80
04/30/77
06/27/76
02/18/99
12/05/90(8)
08/09/78
06/03/78
01/02/81
07/30/77
02/07/76
09/27/92
06/10/78
04/29/81
04/24/80
Page 25 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481552#
480674A
481012
480811 A
480278
480891#
481015
481142
48090 1#
480907
481075
480818
481635#
480368#
481109
480806
480915#
480886
480736
480946
480208#
481020
481626#
480924
481016
480679A
481686#
481524#
481553#
481525#
480943#
480863
481671#
481125
481554#
481657#
481315#
481153
481612#
481058#
480500#
481670#
481083
480752
480921
481533#
481534#
480495
480994
481082
480764
481527#
481555#
480773
Community Name
KENNARD, TOWN OF
KERMIT, CITY OF
KRESS, CITY OF
LADONIA, CITY OF
LAKEVIEW, TOWN OF
LAMAR COUNTY*
LAWN, TOWN OF
LEARY, CITY OF
LEE COUNTY*
LEONA, TOWN OF
LIP AN, VILLAGE OF
LOCKNEY, TOWN OF
LOG CABIN, CITY OF
LONE OAK, CITY OF
LORAINE, TOWN OF
LOTT, CITY OF
LUBBOCK COUNTY*
LUEDERS, CITY OF
MARIETTA, TOWN OF
MATADOR, TOWN OF
MAYPEARL, CITY OF
MEADOW, TOWN OF
MELISSA, CITY OF
MELVIN, TOWN OF
MERKEL, CITY OF
MINEOLA, CITY OF
MISSION BEND M.U.D. #1
MOBEETIE, TOWN OF
MOORE STATION, CITY OF
MORGAN'S POINT RESORT, TOWN OF
MORRIS COUNTY*
MOUNT CALM, CITY OF
MOUNTAIN CITY OAKS, CITY OF
MULLIN, TOWN OF
MUSTANG, TOWN OF
NEVADA, CITY OF
NEW DEAL, CITY OF
NEW SUMMERFIELD, CITY OF
NEWARK, CITY OF
NEWCASTLE, CITY OF
NEWTON, CITY OF
NIEDERWALD, CITY OF
NORTH CLEVELAND, CITY OF
NOVICE, CITY OF
O'DONNELL, CITY OF
OAK GROVE, TOWN OF
OAK RIDGE, TOWN OF
OMAHA, CITY OF
OVERTON, CITY OF
OZONA, CITY OF
PAINT ROCK, TOWN OF
PATTISON, TOWN OF
PAYNE SPRINGS, CITY OF
PECAN GAP, CITY OF
County
HOUSTON COUNTY
WINKLER COUNTY
SWISHER COUNTY
FANNIN COUNTY
HALL COUNTY
LAMAR COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
BOWIE COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LEON COUNTY
HOOD COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
FALLS COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
MOTLEY COUNTY
ELLIS COUNTY
TERRY COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
MCCULLOCH
COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
HARRIS COUNTY
FORT BEND COUNTY
WHEELER COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
BELL COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
MILLS COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
LUBBOCK COUNTY
CHEROKEE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
YOUNG COUNTY
NEWTON COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
LIBERTY COUNTY
COLEMAN COUNTY
LYNN COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
KAUFMAN COUNTY
MORRIS COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
CROCKETT COUNTY
CONCHO COUNTY
WALLER COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
DELTA COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
03/11/80
05/24/74
02/21/75
06/19/85(F)
12/06/74
1 1/29/77
06/25/76
11/26/76
11/16/82(F)
11/19/76
10/29/76
07/02/76
09/27/9 1(F)
09/04/9 1(F)
06/27/75
07/09/76
11/29/77
08/13/76
06/25/76
11/05/76
01/20/99(F)
08/22/75
04/02/9 1(F)
10/29/76
05/02/75
06/04/76
12/31/74(F)
12/18/79
09/27/9 1(F)
06/19/79
08/09/77
1 1/05/76
02/18/98(F)
06/11/76
05/06/80
01/19/96(F)
05/16/78
11/19/76
03/19/90(F)
0 1/02/9 1(F)
06/07/74
02/18/98(F)
05/06/77
07/02/76
08/27/76
07/17/79
06/26/79
02/06/76
08/13/76
12/07/73
08/13/76
02/03/82(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
08/20/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
03/11/81
05/24/75
02/21/76
09/02/88(8)
12/06/75
1 1/29/78
06/25/77
11/26/77
11/16/83
11/19/77
10/29/77
07/02/77
09/27/92
06/27/76
06/27/76
07/09/77
11/29/78
08/13/77
06/25/77
11/05/77
11/29/75
08/22/76
04/02/92
10/29/77
05/02/76
06/04/77
05/26/71
12/18/80
06/17/81
06/19/80
08/09/78
1 1/05/77
02/18/99
06/11/77
05/06/81
01/19/97
05/16/79
11/19/77
03/19/91
12/17/77
06/07/75
02/18/99
05/06/78
07/02/77
08/27/77
07/17/80
06/26/80
02/06/77
08/13/77
12/07/74
08/13/77
06/12/80
07/01/81
08/20/77
Page 26 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
481673#
481653#
480864
481241#
48033 1#
480724
480645A
481117
480370#
480715
480975#
480628A
481158
480957
480562#
480958
481316#
480749
480225A
481119
480816
481039
481160#
481556#
480876
48061 1#
480751
481280#
481161
480564#
480332#
481004#
480867
480090#
481163#
481318#
481633#
480825A
481024
480753
480934
480914
480646
481021#
481023A
481532#
481130
481018
481668#
481131A
481040#
481557#
481249#
Community Name
PECAN HILL, CITY OF
PELICAN BAY, CITY OF
PENELOPE, TOWN OF
POTTER COUNTY *
POYNOR, CITY OF
PUTNAM, TOWN OF
PYOTE, TOWN OF
QUEEN CITY, TOWN OF
QUINLAN, CITY OF
QUITAQUE, CITY OF
RAINS COUNTY*
RANKIN, CITY OF
RETREAT, TOWN OF
RICE, CITY OF
RICHLAND SPRINGS, CITY OF
RICHLAND, TOWN OF
RIESEL, TOWN OF
ROBERT LEE, CITY OF
ROBY, CITY OF
ROSEBUD, CITY OF
ROUND TOP, TOWN OF
SABINAL, CITY OF
SADLER, TOWN OF
SAN PATRICIO, TOWN OF
SANFORD, TOWN OF
SANSOM PARK VILLAGE, CITY OF
SANTA ANNA, TOWN OF
SCOTLAND, CITY OF
SCOTTSVILLE, TOWN OF
SCURRY COUNTY*
SEVEN POINTS, CITY OF
SHELBY COUNTY*
SMYER, TOWN OF
SNOOK, CITY OF
SOUTHMAYD, TOWN OF
ST. PAUL, TOWN OF
STAR HARBOR, CITY OF
STREETMAN, TOWN OF
TALCO, CITY OF
TALPA, TOWN OF
THORNDALE, TOWN OF
THORNTON, TOWN OF
THORNTONVILLE, CITY OF
THROCKMORTON COUNTY *
TITUS COUNTY*
TOOL, CITY OF
TRENT, TOWN OF
TYE, CITY OF
UHLAND, TOWNSHIP OF
VALENTINE, TOWN OF
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
VINTON, TOWN OF
WARD COUNTY *
County
ELLIS COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
HILL COUNTY
POTTER COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CALLAHAN COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
CASS COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
BRISCOE COUNTY
RAINS COUNTY
UPTON COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
SAN SABA COUNTY
NAVARRO COUNTY
MCLENNAN COUNTY
COKE COUNTY
FISHER COUNTY
FALLS COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
UVALDE COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
SAN PATRICIO
COUNTY
HUTCHINSON
COUNTY
TARRANT COUNTY
COLEMAN COUNTY
ARCHER COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
SCURRY COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
SHELBY COUNTY
HOCKLEY COUNTY
BURLESON COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
FREESTONE COUNTY
TITUS COUNTY
COLEMAN COUNTY
MILAM COUNTY
LIMESTONE COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
THROCKMORTON
COUNTY
TITUS COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
HAYS COUNTY
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY
VAN ZANDT COUNTY
EL PASO COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
01/20/99(F)
08/02/95(F)
04/23/76
12/06/77
05/18/82(F)
08/13/76
02/06/76
04/23/76
09/04/9 1(F)
10/22/76
10/18/77
05/10/74
07/11/75
09/26/75
07/02/9 1(F)
07/25/75
05/23/78
06/27/75
05/17/74
10/29/76
10/29/76
09/26/75
05/18/92(F)
07/15/80
08/13/76
01/06/93(F)
06/27/75
06/14/77
12/10/76
05/10/77
09/27/9 1(F)
08/01/78
08/13/76
06/15/88(F)
07/17/95(F)
04/02/9 1(F)
09/27/9 1(F)
05/06/77
10/22/76
07/23/76
08/13/76
1 1/05/76
08/13/76
05/27/80
06/03/77
09/27/9 1(F)
07/23/76
07/11/75
02/18/98(F)
05/01/85(F)
01/10/78
06/24/80
10/23/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/20/00
08/02/96
04/23/77
12/06/78
06/11/77
08/13/77
02/06/77
04/23/77
04/16/77
10/22/77
10/18/78
05/10/75
07/11/76
09/26/76
11/08/75
07/25/76
05/23/79
06/27/76
05/17/75
10/29/77
10/29/77
09/26/76
07/02/77
07/15/81
08/13/77
12/10/77
06/27/76
06/14/78
12/10/77
05/10/78
11/05/77
08/01/79
08/13/77
11/05/77
09/12/76
06/06/79
09/27/92
05/06/78
10/22/77
07/23/77
08/13/77
1 1/05/77
08/13/77
05/27/81
06/03/78
05/29/80
07/23/77
07/11/76
02/18/99
09/02/88(8)
01/10/79
06/24/81
10/23/78
Page 27 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
480850
480855
480371#
480938
481324#
480729
481623#
480647
480922
481025
480675A
480573A
481636#
480687#
Community Name
WASKOM, CITY OF
WEINERT, CITY OF
WEST TAWAKONI, CITY OF
WESTBROOK, CITY OF
WESTON, TOWN OF
WHITE DEER, TOWN OF
WHITESBORO, CITY OF
WICKETT, CITY OF
WILSON, TOWN OF
WINFIELD, TOWN OF
WINK, CITY OF
WINONA, CITY OF
WIXON VALLEY, CITY OF
ZAP ATA COUNTY *
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
HARRISON COUNTY
HASKELL COUNTY
HUNT COUNTY
MITCHELL COUNTY
COLLIN COUNTY
CARSON COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
WARD COUNTY
LYNN COUNTY
TITUS COUNTY
WINKLER COUNTY
SMITH COUNTY
BRAZOS COUNTY
ZAP ATA COUNTY
0
6
3
Hazard Area
Identified
10/29/76
11/12/76
09/04/9 1(F)
11/12/76
04/02/9 1(F)
07/02/76
05/18/92(F)
07/01/88(F)
07/16/76
11/12/76
06/28/74
11/01/74
07/02/92(F)
08/02/74
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
10/29/77
11/12/77
04/16/77
11/12/77
05/23/79
07/02/77
05/18/93
07/01/88(8)
07/16/77
11/12/77
06/28/75
11/01/75
07/02/93
08/02/75
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 196
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 196
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 28 of 28
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
"UTAH
490228# ALPINE, CITY OF
490243 ALTON, TOWN OF
490152# AMERICAN FORK, CITY OF
490122# ANNABELLA, TOWN OF
490123# AURORA, CITY OF
490001# BEAVER COUNTY*
490 1 84 BICKNELL, TOWN OF
490247# BLUFFDALE, CITY OF
490039# BOUNTIFUL, CITY OF
490005# BOX ELDER COUNTY*
490006# BRIGHAM CITY, CITY OF
4900 1 2# CACHE COUNTY*
490032# CARBON COUNTY *
490059# CASTLE DALE, CITY OF
490074# CEDAR CITY, CITY OF
490153 CEDAR FORT, TOWN OF
490040# CENTER VILLE, CITY OF
490165# CHARLESTON, TOWN OF
490095 CIRCLEVILLE, TOWN OF
4900 14# CLARKSTON, TOWN OF
49004 1 # CLEARFIELD, CITY OF
490 196A CLEVELAND, TOWN OF
490042 CLINTON, CITY OF
490135 COAL VILLE, CITY OF
490197# CORINNE, CITY OF
49003 8# DAVIS COUNTY *
490206 DELTA, CITY OF
490244# DRAPER, CITY OF
490055# DUCHESNE, CITY OF
490225A EAST CARBON, CITY OF
490 125# ELSINORE, TOWN OF
490058 EMERY COUNTY
490060 EMERY, TOWN OF
490 169A ENTERPRISE, CITY OF
490 1 1 2B EPHRAIM,CITY OF
490067# ESCALANTE, TOWN OF
490079 EUREKA, CITY OF
490113A FAIRVIEW, CITY OF
490044# FARMINGTON, CITY OF
490061 FERRON, CITY OF
490087 FILLMORE, CITY OF
490045# FRUIT HEIGHTS, CITY OF
490065# GARFIELD COUNTY *
490154 GENOLA, TOWN OF
490084A GLENDALE, TOWN OF
490 126A GLENWOOD, TOWN OF
490141 GRANTSVILLE, CITY OF
490062# GREEN RIVER, CITY OF
490 1 1 5 GUNNISON, CITY OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
UTAH COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
WASATCH COUNTY
PIUTE COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DUCHESNE COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
JUAB COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/11/76(R)
07/10/85(R)
ll/25/80(R)
10/30/79(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/18/87(R)
01/30/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
08/17/81(R)
02/01/87(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
10/16/84(R)
01/30/84(R)
03/01/82(R)
08/05/80(R)
01/30/84(R)
08/19/80(R)
02/20/79(R)
06/11/92
07/21/78(R)
01/30/84(R)
07/15/80(R)
03/01/82(R)
12/09/85(R)
12/18/85(R)
02/04/88(R)
05/01/86(R)
08/14/79(R)
12/11/85(R)
09/11/78(R)
04/01/87(R)
04/03/87(R)
08/28/79(R)
03/01/86(R)
02/01/87(R)
08/17/81(R)
01/30/84(R)
1 1/05/85(R)
08/17/81(R)
08/05/86(R)
01/30/84(R)
05/01/86(R)
07/01/86(R)
07/10/85(R)
03/18/86(R)
01/30/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/04/83
(NSFHA)
ll/25/80(M)
10/30/79(M)
01/12/82(M)
09/18/87
(NSFHA)
09/30/94
09/27/91
09/01/87(L)
08/17/81
02/01/87(L)
12/03/93
05/01/80
10/16/84
(NSFHA)
02/19/92
08/05/80(M)
(NSFHA)
08/19/80(M)
02/20/79(M)
07/12/77
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/15/80(M)
1 1/02/95
(NSFHA)
12/18/85
02/04/88
05/01/86(L)
04/06/98
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/01/87(L)
04/03/87(M)
08/28/79(M)
03/01/86(L)
02/01/87(L)
02/16/96
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
08/17/81
08/05/86(M)
(NSFHA)
05/01/86(L)
07/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
03/18/86(M)
(NSFHA)
Page 1 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
490208#
490068#
490166#
490034#
490136#
490069#
490200
490201
490008#
490063
490172
4900 16#
4900 17#
490073#
490173
490127#
490096#
490137
490085#
490077
490083#
490088
490046#
490128
490099
490174
490047#
490246#
490175
490209#
490080
4900 18#
4902 10#
4900 19#
490116#
490009#
490156#
490098#
490020#
49021 1#
490167#
490003
490233#
490021
490072#
490129#
490212
490093#
490092#
490118#
Community Name
HARRISVILLE, CITY OF
HATCH, TOWN OF
HEBER CITY, CITY OF
HELPER, CITY OF
HENEFER, TOWN OF
HENRIEVILLE, TOWN OF
HINCKLEY, TOWN OF
HOLDEN, TOWN OF
HONEYVILLE, CITY OF
HUNTINGTON, CITY OF
HURRICANE, CITY OF
HYDE PARK, TOWN OF
HYRUM, CITY OF
IRON COUNTY *
IVINS, TOWN OF
JOSEPH, TOWN OF
JUNCTION, TOWN OF
KAMAS, CITY OF
KANAB, CITY OF
KANARRAVILLE, CITY OF
KANE COUNTY *
KANOSH, CITY OF
KAYSVILLE, CITY OF
KOOSHAREM, TOWN OF
LAKETOWN, TOWN OF
LAVERKIN, CITY OF
LAYTON, CITY OF
INCLUDES THE AREA FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE
CITY OF EAST LAYTON
LEAMINGTON, TOWN OF
LEEDS, TOWN OF
LEHI, CITY OF
LEVAN, TOWN OF
LEWISTON, CITY OF
LINDON, CITY OF
LOGAN, CITY OF
MANTI,CITY OF
MANTUA, TOWN OF
MAPLETON, CITY OF
MARYSVALE, CITY OF
MENDON, CITY OF
MID VALE, CITY OF
MIDWAY, CITY OF
MILFORD, CITY OF
MILLARD COUNTY*
MILLVILLE, TOWN OF
MOAB, CITY OF
MONROE CITY, CITY OF
MONTICELLO, CITY OF
MORGAN CITY, CITY OF
MORGAN COUNTY *
MORONI, CITY OF
County
WEBER COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
WASATCH COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
PIUTE COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
RICH COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
JUAB COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
PIUTE COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
WASATCH COUNTY
BEAVER COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/82(R)
07/24/79(R)
03/18/87(R)
03/01/79(R)
05/20/80(R)
09/25/79(R)
1 1/30/83(R)
03/01/86(R)
07/29/80(R)
02/02/84(R)
02/02/84(R)
07/29/80(R)
04/08/80(R)
07/17/86(R)
08/23/82(R)
08/28/79(R)
01/16/87(R)
02/02/84(R)
08/19/85(R)
12/11/85(R)
07/01/86(R)
12/11/85(R)
03/01/82(R)
02/02/84(R)
07/15/85(R)
02/02/84(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/04/87(R)
02/02/84(R)
09/14/79(R)
02/02/84(R)
07/29/80(R)
02/19/86(R)
09/28/84(R)
08/04/87(R)
07/08/80(R)
12/16/80(R)
02/05/86(R)
07/22/80(R)
02/02/84(R)
08/19/80(R)
02/02/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
03/13/85
06/04/80(R)
07/24/79(R)
12/06/99
07/16/87(R)
09/28/90(R)
08/05/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/82
07/24/79(M)
03/18/87
03/01/79
05/20/80(M)
09/28/79(M)
(NSFHA)
03/01/86(L)
07/29/80(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/29/80(M)
04/08/80(M)
07/17/86(M)
(NSFHA)
06/02/95
01/16/87
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
(NSFHA)
07/01/86(L)
(NSFHA)
03/01/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/01/82
09/04/87
(NSFHA)
03/01/83
(NSFHA)
07/29/80(M)
02/19/86(M)
09/28/84
08/04/87
07/08/80(M)
12/16/80(M)
02/05/86(M)
07/22/80(M)
09/30/94
08/19/80(M)
(NSFHA)
09/04/87
10/22/76
06/04/80
07/24/79(M)
12/24/76
07/16/87
09/28/90
08/05/80(M)
Page 2 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
490213#
490103#
490056#
490229#
490022#
490024#
4902 14#
490048#
490090
490138#
490189#
490064#
490086
4902 16#
490070#
490075#
490139#
490076#
490157#
4900 10#
490094#
4902 17#
490235
490218
490036#
490226
490159#
490130
490131#
490027#
490190#
490104#
490223B
490160#
490132#
490105#
490102#
490109
490106#
490111#
490178#
490227
490250
490091
490121#
490133A
490029#
490107#
490191#
4902 19#
490049#
49024 1#
490119#
490163#
Community Name
MOUNT PLEASANT, CITY OF
MURRAY, CITY OF
MYTON, CITY OF
NEPHI, CITY OF
NEWTON, TOWN OF
NORTH LOGAN, CITY OF
NORTH OGDEN, CITY OF
NORTH SALT LAKE CITY, CITY OF
OAK CITY, TOWN OF
OAKLEY, TOWN OF
OGDEN, CITY OF
ORANGEVILLE, CITY OF
ORDERVILLE, TOWN OF
OREM, CITY OF
PANGUITCH, CITY OF
PARAGONAH, TOWN OF
PARK CITY, CITY OF
PAROWAN, CITY OF
PAYSON, CITY OF
PERRY CITY, CITY OF
PIUTE COUNTY *
PLAIN CITY, CITY OF
PLEASANT GROVE CITY, CITY OF
PLEASANT VIEW, CITY OF
PRICE, CITY OF
PROVIDENCE, CITY OF
PROVO, CITY OF
REDMOND, TOWN OF
RICHFIELD, CITY OF
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RIVERDALE, CITY OF
RIVERTON, CITY OF
ROY, CITY OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SALINA, CITY OF
SALT LAKE CITY, CITY OF
SALT LAKE COUNTY *
SAN JUAN COUNTY
SANDY CITY, CITY OF
SANPETE COUNTY*
SANTA CLARA, CITY OF
SANTAGUIN, CITY OF
SARATOGA SPRINGS, TOWN OF
adopted Utah County FIRM dated 12-15-94.
SCIPIO, TOWN OF
SEVIER COUNTY *
SIGURD, CITY OF
SMITHFIELD, CITY OF
SOUTH JORDAN, CITY OF
SOUTH OGDEN, CITY OF
SOUTH SALT LAKE, CITY OF
SOUTH WEBER, CITY OF
SPANISH FORK, CITY OF
SPRING CITY, CITY OF
SPRINGVILLE, CITY OF
County
SANPETE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DUCHESNE COUNTY
JUAB COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
EMERY COUNTY
KANE COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
PIUTE COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
SEVIER COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/24/84(R)
12/18/85(R)
02/04/88(R)
08/05/86(R)
07/22/80(R)
03/18/86(R)
01/19/83(R)
08/29/78(R)
02/02/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/19/83(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/02/84(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/28/79(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/16/87(R)
03/18/86(R)
11/15/78(R)
05/20/80(R)
03/18/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
1 1/30/83(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
03/01/79(R)
02/02/84(R)
02/01/79(R)
1 1/30/83(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/12/80(R)
02/03/82(R)
02/19/86(R)
10/24/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
09/29/86(R)
08/01/83(R)
12/18/85(R)
12/11/85(R)
12/18/85(R)
06/01/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
12/11/85(R)
05/10/99(R)
02/02/84(R)
07/01/86(R)
01/01/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
12/18/85(R)
03/01/82(R)
12/18/85(R)
09/12/78(R)
02/19/86(R)
08/05/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/24/84(M)
09/30/94
02/04/88(M)
1 1/04/87
07/22/80(M)
03/18/86(M)
01/19/83
1 2/22/8 1(M)
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
01/19/83
03/01/79
(NSFHA)
09/24/84(M)
08/28/79(M)
09/24/84
07/16/87
03/18/86(M)
01/06/81
05/20/80(M)
03/18/86(M)
08/10/82
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
12/03/93
(NSFHA)
09/30/88
(NSFHA)
09/29/86
08/12/80(M)
09/06/95
09/30/94
10/24/78(M)
07/16/79
09/29/86
09/30/94
09/30/94
(NSFHA)
09/30/94
06/01/86(L)
12/06/99
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/07/98
01/01/86(L)
03/18/86(M)
09/30/94
03/01/82
09/30/94
05/19/81
02/19/86(M)
08/05/80(M)
02/15/85
Page 3 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
490177#
490144#
490134#
490205#
490050B
490051
490248
490140#
490145#
490180#
490186
49007 1#
490147#
490192#
495517#
490149#
490181A
490164A
490224#
490182#
490187#
490037
49003 1#
490222#
490052#
490249
490108#
490245#
490011 A
490101#
490054B
Community Name
ST. GEORGE, CITY OF
STOCKTON, TOWN OF
SUMMIT COUNTY *
SUNNYSIDE, CITY OF
SUNSET, CITY OF
SYRACUSE, CITY OF
TAYLORSVILLE, CITY OF
THE CITY OF TAYLORSVILLE HAS ADOPTED THE
SALT LAKE COUNTY (490102) FIRM
DATED 9-30-94.
TOOELE COUNTY *
TOOELE, CITY OF
TOQUERVILLE, CITY OF
TORREY, TOWN OF
TROPIC, TOWN OF
UINTAH COUNTY*
UINTAH, TOWN OF
UTAH COUNTY *
VERNAL, CITY OF
VIRGIN, TOWN OF
WASATCH COUNTY *
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WASHINGTON,CITY OF
WEBER COUNTY *
WELLINGTON, CITY OF
WELLSVILLE, CITY OF
WENDOVER, TOWN OF
WEST BOUNTIFUL, CITY OF
WEST HAVEN, CITY OF
WEST JORDAN, CITY OF
WEST VALLEY CITY, CITY OF
WILLARD,CITY OF
WOODRUFF, TOWN OF
WOODS CROSS, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
SUMMIT COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
UINTAH COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
UTAH COUNTY
UINTAH COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASATCH COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
WEBER COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SALT LAKE COUNTY
BOX ELDER COUNTY
RICH COUNTY
DAVIS COUNTY
184
180
39
70
4
3
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/87(R)
08/05/80(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
11/21/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
10/09/98(R)
11/16/90(R)
09/29/89(R)
02/19/86(R)
06/18/86(R)
12/04/79(R)
02/01/86(R)
05/19/81(R)
10/15/82(R)
03/18/86(R)
08/05/86(R)
10/01/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/19/82(R)
02/02/84(R)
07/29/80(R)
08/19/80(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/06/99
09/01/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/22/80(R)
08/29/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/07/98
08/05/80(M)
07/17/86(M)
09/29/78
11/21/78(M)
(NSFHA)
11/16/90
09/29/89
02/19/86(M)
(NSFHA)
12/04/79(M)
02/01/86(L)
05/19/81
12/15/94
03/18/86(M)
08/05/86(M)
10/01/86(L)
03/18/86(M)
09/30/93
09/06/95
(NSFHA)
07/29/80(M)
07/16/96
08/03/81
09/30/94
09/30/94
07/01/87(L)
07/22/80(M)
08/29/78(M)
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 4 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Page 5 of 6 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
490013#
490066
490002A
490232#
490171
490097A
490185
490117
490089
490023A
490025
490215#
490179#
490146
Areas Which Have Had Special
--Not In The
Community Name
"UTAH
AMALGA, TOWN OF
ANTIMONY, TOWN OF
BEAVER, CITY OF
GRAND COUNTY *
HILLDALE, TOWN OF
KINGSTON, TOWN OF
LOA, TOWN OF
MAYFIELD, TOWN OF
MEADOW, TOWN OF
NIBLEY, TOWN OF
PARADISE, TOWN OF
RUSH VALLEY, TOWN OF
SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF
VERNON, TOWN OF
Flood Hazard Areas
Program--
county
CACHE COUNTY
Identified
Hazard Area
Identified
07/22/80(F)
GARFIELD COUNTY 04/02/76
BEAVER COUNTY
GRAND COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
PIUTE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
SANPETE COUNTY
MILLARD COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
CACHE COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
TOOELE COUNTY
04/01/77(F)
10/06/81
06/04/76
02/04/77
12/20/74
05/28/76
07/02/76
08/05/86(F)
1 1/05/76
10/25/77
05/10/77
06/04/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/06/89(8)
04/02/77
06/11/75
10/06/82
06/04/77
02/04/78
12/20/75
05/28/77
07/02/77
08/05/86(8)
1 1/05/77
10/25/78
05/10/78
06/04/77
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 2
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 14
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 14
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 6
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500163#
500291B
500012#
500216B
500292B
500024#
500105#
500273#
500081#
500082#
500125#
500013#
500259B
500049#
500106#
500143#
500045#
500308#
500069#
500234#
500235#
500090#
500126#
500144#
500164#
500205#
500001#
500165#
500206#
500025#
500032#
500108B
500107B
Communities Participating
Community Name
"VERMONT
ADDISON, TOWN OF
ANDOVER, TOWN OF
ARLINGTON, TOWN OF
BAKERSFIELD, TOWN OF
BARNARD, TOWN OF
BARNET, TOWN OF
BARRE, CITY OF
BARRE, TOWN OF
BARTON, TOWN OF
BARTON, VILLAGE OF
BELLOWS FALLS, VILLAGE OF
BENNINGTON, TOWN OF
BENSON, TOWN OF
BERKSHIRE, TOWN OF
BERLIN, TOWN OF
BETHEL, TOWN OF
BLOOMFIELD, TOWN OF
BOLTON, TOWN OF
BRADFORD, TOWN OF
BRADFORD, VILLAGE OF
BRAINTREE, TOWN OF
BRANDON, TOWN OF
BRATTLEBORO, TOWN OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
BRIDPORT, TOWN OF
BRIGHTON, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, VILLAGE OF
BRUNSWICK, TOWN OF
BURKE, TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
CABOT, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF CABOT
CABOT, VILLAGE OF
in the National Flood Program
County
ADDISON COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/18/86(R)
08/05/85(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/17/88(R)
01/17/85(R)
06/15/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/03/78(R)
07/16/79(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/01/83(R)
08/15/84(R)
08/05/91(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
04/01/81(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
09/27/85(R)
05/15/78(R)
12/04/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
08/15/79(R)
05/04/89(R)
08/05/86(R)
08/19/86(R)
06/17/91(R)
06/04/80(R)
11/15/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/18/86
08/05/85(M)
07/17/86
09/27/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
05/17/88
01/17/85
06/15/78
02/02/94
02/02/94
12/20/99
06/17/86
09/27/85(M)
06/01/83
08/15/84
08/05/91
06/03/91
04/01/81
06/03/91
06/22/98
09/27/85(M)
02/19/82
12/04/85
07/02/80
08/15/79
03/05/90
12/18/86
08/19/86
06/17/91
06/04/80
01/16/87
09/18/85(M)
500 109B
The Village of Cabot is included in the Town of Cabot. The
town administers the NFIP on behalf of the village.
CALAIS, TOWN OF
50006 1 # CAMBRIDGE, TOWN OF
500228# CAMBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
500046# CANAAN, TOWN OF
500091# CASTLETON, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
09/04/85(R) 09/04/85(M)
06/15/83(R)
06/01/83(R)
09/30/80(R)
07/16/84(R)
06/15/83
06/01/83
09/30/80
07/16/84
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500145#
500309#
500070#
500146#
500092B
500093#
500033#
500207#
500071#
500246A
500312#
500248B
500014A
500127#
500128#
500110#
500111#
500050#
50005 1#
500034#
500094#
500052#
500053B
500072#
500326#
500002#
500054#
500310B
500217#
50025 1#
500129#
500223#
500003#
500085B
500026#
500047#
500130B
500005#
500027#
500148#
500149#
500055#
500322#
500313B
500036#
500230#
Community Name
CAVENDISH, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF PROCTORSVILLE.
CHARLOTTE, TOWN OF
CHELSEA, TOWN OF
CHESTER, TOWN OF
CHITTENDEN, TOWN OF
CLARENDON, TOWN OF
COLCHESTER, TOWN OF
CONCORD, TOWN OF
CORINTH, TOWN OF
COVENTRY, TOWN OF
DANBY, TOWN OF
DERBY, TOWN OF
DORSET, TOWN OF
DOVER, TOWN OF
DUMMERSTON, TOWN OF
DUXBURY, TOWN OF
EAST MONTPELIER, TOWN OF
ENOSBURG FALLS, VILLAGE OF
ENOSBURG, TOWN OF
ESSEX, TOWN OF
FAIR HAVEN, TOWN OF
FAIRFAX, TOWN OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FAIRLEE, TOWN OF
FAYSTON, TOWN OF
FERRISBURG, TOWN OF
FLETCHER, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
GEORGIA, TOWN OF
GLOVER, TOWN OF
GRAFTON, TOWN OF
GRAND ISLE, TOWN OF
GRANVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENSBORO, TOWN OF
GROTON, TOWN OF
GUILDHALL, TOWN OF
GUILFORD, TOWN OF
HANCOCK, TOWN OF
HARDWICK, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF HARDWICK
HARTFORD, TOWN OF
HARTLAND, TOWN OF
HIGHGATE, TOWN OF
HINESBURG, TOWN OF
HUBBARDTON, TOWN OF
HUNTINGTON, TOWN OF
HYDE PARK, TOWN OF
County
WINDSOR COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
10/15/81(R)
09/03/80(R)
08/15/80(R)
03/04/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
03/01/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/01/86(R)
07/01/91(R)
06/17/91(R)
03/15/82(R)
05/02/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
06/19/96(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/16/84(R)
01/20/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
09/30/80(R)
09/18/86(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/05/91(R)
08/04/87(R)
06/03/88(R)
08/19/91(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/17/91(R)
06/03/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
06/15/84(R)
07/02/79(R)
06/03/93(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/27/85(R)
12/01/90(R)
07/17/78(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
10/15/81
09/03/80
08/15/80
02/26/82
09/18/85(M)
11/19/80
03/01/82
09/30/92
09/27/91
09/27/85
08/01/80
09/27/85(M)
08/01/86(L)
07/01/91(L)
06/17/91
11/19/97
05/02/83
01/02/81
01/02/81
03/25/83
04/02/93
01/20/82
09/27/85(M)
06/03/91
09/30/80
09/18/86
12/01/81
09/18/85(M)
09/16/81
08/05/91
08/04/87
06/03/88
08/19/91
09/27/85(M)
09/27/91
06/17/91
06/03/86(M)
08/19/91
01/16/87
02/17/89
06/15/88
04/04/83
09/27/85(M)
12/01/90(L)
07/17/78
11/04/81
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
50023 1#
500260B
500131#
500253#
500062#
500037#
500063#
500232#
500178A
500006B
500212#
500007#
500132#
500254B
500150#
500294#
500028#
500015#
500283B
500323#
500113#
500095B
500008#
500114#
500261A
500038#
500167#
500056#
505518#
500116#
500064#
500065#
500096B
500009#
500237#
500133#
500086#
500256#
500225#
500087#
500118#
500117#
Community Name
HYDE PARK, VILLAGE OF
IRA, TOWN OF
JAMAICA, TOWN OF
JAY, TOWN OF
JEFFERSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
JERICHO, TOWN OF
JOHNSON, TOWN OF
JOHNSON, VILLAGE OF
LANDGROVE, TOWN OF
LEICESTER, TOWN OF
LEMINGTON, TOWN OF
LINCOLN, TOWN OF
LONDONDERRY, TOWN OF
LOWELL, TOWN OF
LUDLOW, TOWN OF
LUDLOW, VILLAGE OF
LYNDON, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF LYNDONVILLE
MANCHESTER, TOWN OF
MARLBORO, TOWN OF
MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF
MARSHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
MENDON, TOWN OF
MIDDLEBURY, TOWN OF
MIDDLESEX, TOWN OF
MIDDLETOWN SPRINGS, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF MILTON
MONKTON, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY, TOWN OF
MONTPELIER, CITY OF
MORETOWN, TOWN OF
MORRISTOWN,TOWN OF
MORRISVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MT. HOLLY, TOWN OF
NEW HAVEN, TOWN OF
NEWBURY, TOWN OF
INCLUDE THE VILLAGES OF NEWBURY & WELLS
RIVER
NEWFANE, TOWN AND VILLAGE OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NEWPORT, TOWN OF
NORTH HERO, TOWN OF
NORTH TROY, VILLAGE OF
NORTHFIELD, TOWN OF
NORTHFIELD, VILLAGE OF
County
LAMOILLE COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
12/15/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/05/81(R)
04/07/92
06/15/83(R)
06/01/81(R)
02/01/79(R)
02/01/79(R)
09/18/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/01/92(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
06/18/80(R)
04/03/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/16/84(R)
07/16/84(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/03/85(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
01/06/82(R)
11/01/85(R)
12/02/80(R)
06/22/73(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/03/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/03/78(R)
05/17/90(R)
06/05/89(R)
08/19/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/16/80(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
12/15/81
09/18/85(M)
05/17/88
08/23/00
06/15/83
06/01/81
04/17/87
04/03/87
09/18/85(M)
11/01/85(M)
06/03/91
08/19/86
01/03/97
12/04/85(M)
09/01/78
09/01/78
05/17/88
07/03/85
09/18/85(M)
03/05/96
07/16/84
09/18/85(M)
01/03/85
05/03/82
09/18/85(M)
01/06/82
11/01/85(M)
12/02/80
02/17/82
03/01/84
07/02/87
07/02/87
09/18/85(M)
09/04/86
07/21/99
06/05/89
06/18/80
09/18/85(M)
08/15/80
07/16/80
05/15/78
05/15/78
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500295#
500239B
500088#
500169#
500097#
500263#
500098#
500275#
500151#
500297B
500099#
500266#
500016#
500265#
500134B
500073#
500152#
500017B
500218#
500057#
500040#
500010B
500299#
500135#
500276#
500153#
500018B
500101#
500267#
500030#
500170#
500019C
500300A
500193#
500059#
500171#
500102#
500195#
Community Name
NORWICH, TOWN OF
ORANGE, TOWN OF
ORLEANS, VILLAGE OF
PANTON, TOWN OF
PAWLET, TOWN OF
PITTSFIELD, TOWN OF
PITTSFORD, TOWN OF
PLAINFIELD, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAE OF PLAINFIELD
PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
POMFRET, TOWN OF
POULTNEY, TOWN OF
POULTNEY, VILLAGE OF
POWNAL, TOWN OF
PROCTOR, TOWN OF
PUTNEY, TOWN OF
RANDOLPH, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF RANDOLPH
READING, TOWN OF
READSBORO, TOWN OF
RICHFORD, TOWN OF
RICHFORD, VILLAGE OF
RICHMOND, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF RICHMOND
RIPTON, TOWN OF
ROCHESTER, TOWN OF
ROCKINGHAM, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE CORPORATION OF
SAXTON'S RIVER
ROXBURY, CITY OF
ROY ALTON, TOWN OF
RUPERT, TOWN OF
RUTLAND, CITY OF
RUTLAND, TOWN OF
RYEGATE, TOWN OF
SALISBURY, TOWN OF
SHAFTSBURY, TOWN OF
SHARON, TOWN OF
SHELBURNE, TOWN OF
SHELDON, TOWN OF
SHOREHAM, TOWN OF
SHREWSBURY, TOWN OF
SOUTH BURLINGTON, CITY OF
County
WINDSOR COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
03/15/78(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/04/90(R)
07/04/88(R)
08/01/83(R)
06/19/89(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/02/80(R)
07/02/80(R)
04/01/80(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/16/91(R)
05/04/89(R)
09/27/85(R)
10/15/80(R)
09/03/80(R)
07/05/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/05/91(R)
05/15/80(R)
01/17/86(R)
01/16/81(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/17/78(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/17/91(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/16/95
12/16/80(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/01/78(R)
03/16/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/88
09/18/85(M)
02/02/94
09/18/86
08/01/80
09/04/91
07/04/88
07/16/96
05/07/01
09/18/85(M)
07/02/80
07/02/80
04/01/80
12/01/78
09/18/85(M)
07/16/91
05/04/89
09/27/85(M)
10/15/80
09/03/80
07/05/82
09/18/85(M)
08/05/91
12/20/99
01/17/86(M)
10/20/99
09/18/85(M)
04/17/78
09/29/78
06/17/91
11/01/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
02/04/77
12/16/80
04/01/81
07/25/80
09/01/78
03/16/81
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500226#
500154#
500219#
500058#
50003 1#
500020#
500197
500172B
500155#
500066#
500240#
500021#
500220#
500060#
500075#
500241#
500136C
500089#
500076B
500042#
50001 1#
500137#
500120#
500103#
500138#
500121#
500077A
500123#
500122#
500200A
500156#
500271#
500079#
500104B
500301#
500257
500139#
500157#
500174#
500141B
500080#
Community Name
SOUTH HERO, TOWN OF
SPRINGFIELD, TOWN OF
ST ALBANS, TOWN OF
ST. ALBANS, CITY OF
ST. JOHNSBURY, TOWN OF
STAMFORD, TOWN OF
STANNARD, TOWN OF
STARKSBORO, TOWN OF
STOCKBRIDGE, TOWN OF
STOWE, TOWN OF
STRAFFORD, TOWN OF
SUNDERLAND, TOWN OF
SWANTON, TOWN OF
SWANTON, VILLAGE OF
THETFORD, TOWN OF
TOPSHAM, TOWN OF
TOWNSHEND, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF TOWNSHEND
TROY, TOWN OF
TUNBRIDGE, TOWN OF
UNDERHILL, TOWN OF
VERGENNES, CITY OF
VERNON, TOWN OF
WAITSFIELD, TOWN OF
WALLINGFORD, TOWN OF
WARDSBORO, TOWN OF
WARREN, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WATERBURY, TOWN OF
WATERBURY, VILLAGE OF
WATERFORD, TOWN OF
WEATHERFIELD, TOWN OF
WELLS, TOWNSHIP OF
WEST FAIRLEE, TOWN OF
WEST RUTLAND, TOWN OF
WEST WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WESTFIELD, TOWN OF
WESTMINSTER, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF WESTMINISTER
WESTON, TOWN OF
WEYBRIDGE, TOWN OF
WHITINGHAM, TOWN OF
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF JACKSONVILLE
WILLIAMSTOWN, TOWN OF
County
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
06/15/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/15/88(R)
06/15/78(R)
07/03/86(R)
07/03/78(R)
02/08/85(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/04/86(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/27/85(R)
11/01/85(R)
04/18/83(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/02/80(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/15/88(R)
09/18/86(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
06/01/78(R)
01/16/81(R)
07/16/80(R)
09/01/77(R)
08/28/98
04/15/82(R)
04/15/82(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/15/88(R)
11/15/85(R)
09/01/89(R)
06/17/91(R)
04/01/98(R)
01/03/85(R)
04/01/92(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/15/78
12/20/99
06/15/88
06/15/78
07/03/86
07/03/78
(NSFHA)
12/04/85(M)
09/04/86
02/04/83
02/03/93
11/01/85(M)
04/18/83
03/16/83
12/20/99
09/27/91
09/18/85(M)
12/02/80
09/18/85(M)
06/15/88
09/18/86
09/27/91
09/05/84
01/16/81
07/16/80
09/01/77
02/20/76
04/06/98
04/06/98
11/15/85(M)
06/15/88
06/15/88
12/02/92
09/01/89(L)
06/17/91
04/01/98(L)
01/03/85
01/17/97
09/29/86
09/18/85(M)
07/17/78
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500043#
500142#
500159#
500022#
Community Name
WILLISTON, TOWN OF
WILMINGTON, TOWN OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WINHALL, TOWN OF
County
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
BENNINGTON
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/02/8 1(R)
05/01/78(R)
09/28/79(R)
06/19/89(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/02/81
05/01/78
06/15/88
06/19/89
500044# WINOOSKI, CITY OF
500068# WOLCOTT, TOWN OF
500314A WOODBURY, TOWN OF
500023A WOODFORD, TOWN OF
500160# WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
500161# WOODSTOCK, VILLAGE OF
500278# WORCESTER, TOWN OF
COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WINDSOR COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
08/01/78(R) 02/04/87
08/02/82(R)
11/01/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/15/78(R)
02/15/79(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/06/00
11/01/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
09/15/79
09/13/79
04/03/78
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 216
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 213
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 1
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 46
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 3
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 3
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
500243#
500221#
500222#
500279
500227#
500236#
500280A
500245A
500083A
500317A
500247B
500185
500249
500209B
500229
500318
500035#
500210
500004#
500211
500281A
500252A
500224#
500188
500048A
500213
500179#
500255
500262#
500190A
500238
500180
500214
500168B
500181A
500182B
500183#
500184
500194A
500287
500320A
500321
Community Name
** VERMONT
ALBANY, TOWN OF
ALBURG, TOWN OF
ALBURG, VILLAGE OF
ATHENS, TOWN OF
BELVIDERE, TOWN OF
BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF
BROOKLINE, TOWN OF
BROWNINGTON, TOWN OF
CHARLESTON, TOWN OF
CORNWALL, TOWN OF
CRAFTSBURY, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DERBY CENTER, VILLAGE OF
EAST HAVEN, TOWN OF
EDEN, TOWN OF
ELMORE, TOWN OF
ESSEX JCT., VILLAGE OF
FERDINAND, TOWN OF
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GRANBY, TOWN OF
HALIFAX, TOWN OF
IRASBURG, TOWN OF
ISLE LA MOTTE, TOWN OF
KIRBY, TOWN OF
LUNENBURG, TOWN OF
MAIDSTONE, TOWN OF
MANCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
MORGAN, TOWN OF
MT. TABOR, TOWN OF
NEWARK, TOWN OF
NEWBURY, VILLAGE OF
NORTH BENNINGTON, VILLAGE OF
NORTON, TOWN OF
ORWELL, TOWN OF
PERU, TOWN OF
READSBORO, VILLAGE OF
SANDGATE, TOWN OF
SEARSBURG, TOWN OF
SHEFFIELD, TOWN OF
SOMERSET, TOWN OF
ST. GEORGE, TOWN OF
STRATTON, TOWN OF
County
ORLEANS COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
GRAND ISLE COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
BENNINGTON
COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
01/03/86(F)
03/16/81(F)
03/16/81(F)
12/06/74
10/15/80(F)
09/29/78(F)
09/04/85(F)
12/13/74
08/09/74
09/27/85(F)
09/27/85(F)
01/17/75
03/28/75
09/27/85(F)
12/06/74
04/11/75
0 1/02/8 1(F)
12/13/74
09/01/86(F)
12/13/74
09/04/85(F)
12/20/74
04/15/80(F)
12/13/74
06/28/74
12/13/74
08/19/86(F)
01/31/75
02/04/8 1(F)
01/10/75
1 1/26/76
02/21/75
03/28/75
09/18/85(F)
01/10/75
11/01/85(F)
01/31/75
11/15/74
09/27/85(F)
1 1/22/74
09/27/85(F)
01/31/75
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/03/86(8)
05/05/81(8)
05/05/81(8)
12/06/75
12/06/75
12/13/75
09/04/85(8)
12/13/75
08/09/75
06/04/90(8)
12/18/85(8)
01/17/76
03/28/76
11/01/85(8)
12/06/75
04/11/76
06/28/75
12/13/75
06/04/90(8)
12/13/75
09/04/85(8)
12/20/75
04/15/80(8)
12/13/75
06/28/75
12/13/75
06/04/90(8)
01/31/76
01/10/76
01/10/76
1 1/26/77
02/21/76
03/28/76
06/04/90(8)
01/10/76
11/01/85(8)
01/31/76
11/15/75
11/01/85(8)
1 1/22/75
07/03/86(8)
01/31/76
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
500269
500198A
500270
500242
500215
500173#
500233A
500272
500203
50031 1A
500204
500175#
500290#
Community Name
SUDBURY, TOWN OF
SUTTON, TOWN OF
TINMOUTH, TOWN OF
VERSHIRE, TOWN OF
VICTORY, TOWN OF
WALTHAM, TOWN OF
WATERVILLE, TOWN OF
WEST HAVEN, TOWN OF
WESTFORD, TOWN OF
WESTMORE, TOWN OF
WHEELOCK, TOWN OF
WHITING, TOWN OF
WINDHAM, TOWN OF
County
RUTLAND COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
LAMOILLE COUNTY
RUTLAND COUNTY
CHITTENDEN
COUNTY
ORLEANS COUNTY
CALEDONIA COUNTY
ADDISON COUNTY
WINDHAM COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
01/24/75
12/13/74
12/06/74
01/17/75
12/13/74
07/25/78(F)
12/20/74
01/03/75
01/03/75
01/03/75
11/15/74
09/18/85(F)
09/06/77
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
01/24/76
12/13/75
12/06/75
01/17/76
12/13/75
06/18/90(8)
12/20/75
01/03/76
01/03/76
01/03/76
11/15/75
06/18/90(8)
09/06/78
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 17
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 5 5
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 55
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID
Community Name
"VIRGIN ISLANDS
780000# VIRGIN ISLANDS, TERRITORY OF THE
County
ST. CROIX
ST. JOHN
ST. THOMAS
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
10/15/80(R)
07/20/98
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 1
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 1
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 0
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 0
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 0
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page I of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 0
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 0
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 0
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Hazard Area
Identified
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
Page 2 of 2
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510169#
510001#
510006#
515519#
510009#
510029#
510314#
510010#
510193#
510319#
510011#
510194B
515520#
510075
510013#
510196A
510016#
510015#
510242#
510037
515521#
510100#
510017#
510161#
510062#
510018#
510269A
510151#
510296
510134#
510022#
510135#
510030#
510236#
510024#
510019#
510026#
510027#
510028#
Communities
Community Name
** VIRGINIA
ABINGDON, TOWN OF
ACCOMACK COUNTY *
ALBEMARLE COUNTY *
ALEXANDRIA, CITY OF
ALLEGHANY COUNTY*
ALTAVISTA, TOWN OF
AMELIA COUNTY*
AMHERST COUNTY *
AMHERST, TOWN OF
APPALACHIA, TOWN OF
APPOMATTOX COUNTY *
APPOMATTOX, TOWN OF
ARLINGTON COUNTY *
ASHLAND, TOWN OF
AUGUSTA COUNTY *
BATH COUNTY *
BEDFORD COUNTY *
BEDFORD, CITY OF
BELLE HAVEN, TOWN OF
BERRYVILLE, TOWN OF
BIG STONE GAP, TOWN OF
BLACKSBURG, TOWN OF
BLAND COUNTY *
BLUEFIELD, TOWN OF
BOONES MILL, TOWN OF
BOTETOURT COUNTY *
BOYDTON, TOWN OF
BOYKINS, TOWN OF
BRANCHVILLE, TOWN OF
BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF
BRISTOL, CITY OF
BROADWAY, TOWN OF
BROOKNEAL, TOWN OF
BRUNSWICK COUNTY *
BUCHANAN COUNTY*
BUCHANAN, TOWN OF
BUCKINGHAM COUNTY *
BUENA VISTA, CITY OF
CAMPBELL COUNTY *
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ALLEGHANY
COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
AMELIA COUNTY
AMHERST COUNTY
AMHERST COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
APPOMATTOX
COUNTY
APPOMATTOX
COUNTY
ARLINGTON COUNTY
HANOVER COUNTY
AUGUSTA COUNTY
BATH COUNTY
BEDFORD COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
BLAND COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
BOTETOURT COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
SOUTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SOUTHAMPTON
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
BOTETOURT COUNTY
BUCKINGHAM
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/16/88(R)
06/01/84(R)
12/16/80(R)
05/08/70(R)
07/16/87(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/01/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
09/17/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/31/76(R)
05/26/78(R)
05/17/90(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/01/78(R)
02/08/0 1(R)
04/01/88(R)
12/11/70(R)
05/15/80(R)
01/05/89(R)
07/17/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
06/15/78(R)
12/03/82(R)
04/01/82(R)
03/30/79(R)
12/15/83(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
03/01/78(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
09/16/88(R)
11/02/77(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/17/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/16/88
07/20/98
04/02/90
05/15/91
02/19/92
05/11/80
09/01/87(L)
07/17/78
1 1/02/77
09/15/89
07/17/78
05/25/84(M)
05/03/82
(NSFHA)
05/17/93
09/10/84(M)
06/29/79
04/02/92
12/15/81
04/01/88(L)
09/30/88
05/15/80
01/05/89
08/02/94
09/01/78
06/15/78
12/03/82(M)
04/01/82
(NSFHA)
01/20/93
12/17/93
08/18/92
08/15/83
02/06/91
08/19/97
11/02/77
07/17/78
04/06/00
04/17/84
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510106#
510249#
510197#
510162#
510198#
510333#
510033#
510297#
510114#
510034#
510035#
510185#
510002#
510101#
510158#
510036A
510209#
515522A
510038#
510186#
510143#
510176#
510172#
510039#
510059#
510152#
510040#
510313#
510014#
510264
510041#
510042#
510043#
510170#
510044#
510136#
510253#
510187#
510032#
510240
510120#
510213A
510137#
Community Name
CAPE CHARLES, TOWN OF
CAROLINE COUNTY *
CARROLL COUNTY *
CEDAR BLUFF, TOWN OF
CHARLES CITY COUNTY *
CHARLOTTE COUNTY *
CHARLOTTESVILLE, CITY OF
CHASE CITY, TOWN OF
CHATHAM, TOWN OF
CHESAPEAKE, CITY OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY *
CHILHOWIE, TOWN OF
CHINCOTEAGUE, TOWN OF
CHRISTIANSBURG, TOWN OF
CLAREMONT, TOWN OF
CLARKE COUNTY *
CLARKSVILLE, TOWN OF
CLEVELAND, TOWN OF
CLIFTON FORGE, CITY OF
CLIFTON, TOWN OF
CLINCHPORT, TOWN OF
COEBURN, TOWN OF
COLONIAL BEACH, TOWN OF
COLONIAL HEIGHTS, CITY OF
COLUMBIA, TOWN OF
COURTLAND, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
CRAIG COUNTY *
CRAIGSVILLE, TOWN OF
CREWE, TOWN OF
CULPEPER COUNTY*
CULPEPER, TOWN OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY *
DAMASCUS, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, CITY OF
DAYTON, TOWN OF
DICKENSON COUNTY *
DINWIDDIE COUNTY *
DRAKES BRANCH, TOWN OF
DUFFIELD, TOWN OF
DUMFRIES, TOWN OF
EDINBURG, TOWN OF
ELKTON, TOWN OF
County
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
CHARLES CITY
COUNTY
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
PITTS YLVANIA
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
SMYTH COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
CLARKE COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
FAIRFAX COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
FLUVANNA COUNTY
SOUTHAMPTON
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CRAIG COUNTY
AUGUSTA COUNTY
NOTTOWAY COUNTY
CULPEPER COUNTY
CULPEPER COUNTY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
DICKENSON COUNTY
DINWIDDIE COUNTY
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
PRINCE WILLIAM CO.
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/02/83(R)
08/15/89(R)
02/18/83(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/05/90(R)
11/01/97(R)
06/15/79(R)
06/18/82(R)
02/01/79(R)
02/02/77(R)
03/16/83(R)
06/15/78(R)
03/01/77(R)
08/15/80(R)
10/16/90(R)
09/24/84(R)
08/06/82(R)
02/19/71(R)
09/01/78(R)
05/02/77(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/02/80(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/29/78(R)
07/05/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
02/02/90(R)
04/15/86(R)
04/16/98
07/01/87(R)
03/02/89(R)
02/15/79(R)
03/16/88(R)
03/16/81(R)
10/15/85(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
01/17/79(R)
06/11/82(R)
05/25/78(R)
05/15/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
06/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/02/83
08/15/89
02/18/83(M)
05/04/87
09/05/90
11/01/97(L)
06/15/79
06/18/82(M)
02/01/79
05/02/99
05/02/94
1 1/05/97
06/01/84
08/15/80
1 1/02/90
09/24/84(M)
08/06/82(M)
05/14/76
09/01/78
05/02/77
09/29/78
07/02/80
09/18/87
10/18/88
09/29/78
07/05/82
01/03/79
02/02/90
1 1/03/89
02/11/77
07/01/87(L)
03/02/89
02/15/79
03/16/88
03/16/81
10/15/85
02/06/91
01/17/79
06/11/82(M)
(NSFHA)
05/15/80
09/24/84(M)
09/03/92
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510047#
510048#
510364
515525#
515524#
510054#
510118#
510055#
510020#
510199#
510058#
510061#
510060#
510063#
510065#
510215#
510167#
510145#
510067#
510320#
515526#
510289#
510071#
510072#
510217#
510243#
510200A
510073#
510138#
510025#
510188#
510301#
510218#
515527#
510237#
510076#
510121#
510046#
510077#
510078#
510052#
510311#
510305#
510321#
510080#
Community Name
EMPORIA, CITY OF
ESSEX COUNTY *
EXMORE, TOWN OF
FAIRFAX COUNTY *
FAIRFAX, CITY OF
FALLS CHURCH, CITY OF
FARMVILLE, TOWN OF
FAUQUIER COUNTY *
FINCASTLE, TOWN OF
FLOYD COUNTY *
FLUVANNA COUNTY *
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FREDERICK COUNTY *
FREDERICKSBURG, CITY OF
FRIES, TOWN OF
FRONT ROYAL, TOWN OF
GATE CITY, TOWN OF
GILES COUNTY *
GLADE SPRING, TOWN OF
GLASGOW, TOWN OF
GLEN LYN, TOWN OF
GLOUCESTER COUNTY*
GOOCHLAND COUNTY *
GOSHEN, TOWN OF
GRAYSON COUNTY *
GREENE COUNTY *
GREENSVILLE COUNTY *
GROTTOES, TOWN OF
GRUNDY, TOWN OF
HALIFAX COUNTY *
HALIFAX, TOWN OF
HALL WOOD, TOWN OF
HAMPTON,CITY OF
HANOVER COUNTY *
HARRISONBURG, CITY OF
HAYMARKET, TOWN OF
HAYSI, TOWN OF
HENRICO COUNTY *
HENRY COUNTY *
HERNDON, TOWN OF
HIGHLAND COUNTY *
HILLSVILLE, TOWN OF
HOMAKER, TOWN OF
HOPEWELL, CITY OF
County
INDEPENDENT CITY
ESSEX COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
FAIRFAX COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
PRINCE EDWARD
COUNTY
FAUQUIER COUNTY
BOTETOURT COUNTY
FLOYD COUNTY
FLUVANNA COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
FREDERICK COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
GRAYSON COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ROCKBRIDGE
COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
GLOUCESTER
COUNTY
GOOCHLAND
COUNTY
ROCKBRIDGE
COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
GREENSVILLE
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
BUCHANAN COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
HANOVER COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
PRINCE WILLIAM
COUNT
DICKENSON COUNTY
HENRICO COUNTY
HENRY COUNTY
FAIRFAX COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
CARROLL COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/30/77(R)
12/16/88(R)
02/08/01
01/07/72(R)
12/17/71(R)
02/03/82(R)
09/01/78(R)
11/01/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
09/29/89(R)
08/15/78(R)
05/19/81(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
07/02/79(R)
02/11/83(R)
07/15/88(R)
03/15/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
03/16/88(R)
03/23/73(R)
03/15/79(R)
08/04/87(R)
03/01/79(R)
08/15/78(R)
07/17/89(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/15/78(R)
08/16/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/08/82(R)
05/01/00(R)
01/15/71(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
1 1/03/89(R)
01/31/90(R)
01/17/79(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
11/05/80(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
08/06/82(R)
04/05/88(R)
09/05/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/02/89
12/16/88
03/05/90
03/02/93
02/03/82
09/01/78
08/19/91
05/15/78
09/29/89
08/15/78
05/19/81
08/15/80
07/17/78
07/02/79
02/11/83(M)
07/15/88
03/15/79
06/15/81
03/16/88
04/06/00
03/15/79
08/03/92
03/01/79
04/06/00
07/17/89
09/10/84(M)
09/29/78
09/15/78
08/19/97
08/01/78
01/19/00
05/03/82
07/03/95
09/02/81
1 1/03/89
01/05/95
02/06/91
02/04/81
11/05/80
08/01/79
08/24/84(M)
08/06/82(M)
04/05/88
09/05/79
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510219#
510238#
510220#
510221#
510303#
510201#
510263#
510086#
510082#
510312#
510304#
510084#
510023#
510222#
510085#
510091#
510089#
510090#
510092#
510309#
510110#
510093#
510094#
510123#
510122#
510223#
510095#
510096#
510206
510189#
510098#
510274C
510099#
510148B
510224#
510068#
510102#
510340#
510306#
510227#
510103#
510104#
Community Name
HURT, TOWN OF
INDEPENDENCE, TOWN OF
IRON GATE, TOWN OF
IRVINGTON, TOWN OF
ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY *
JAMES CITY COUNTY *
JARRATT, TOWN OF
JONESVILLE, TOWN OF
KING & QUEEN COUNTY *
KING GEORGE COUNTY *
KING WILLIAM COUNTY *
LANCASTER COUNTY*
LAWRENCEVILLE, TOWN OF
LEBANON, TOWN OF
LEE COUNTY*
LEESBURG, TOWN OF
LEXINGTON, CITY OF
LOUDOUN COUNTY *
LOUISA COUNTY *
LUNENBURG COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWNS OF VICTORIA AND
KENBRIDGE
LURAY, TOWN OF
LYNCHBURG, CITY OF
MADISON COUNTY *
MANASSAS PARK, CITY OF
MANASSAS, CITY OF
MARION, TOWN OF
MARTINSVILLE, CITY OF
MATHEWS COUNTY*
MC KENNEY, TOWN OF
MECKLENBURG COUNTY *
MIDDLESEX COUNTY *
MIDDLETOWN, TOWN OF
MONTGOMERY COUNTY *
MOUNT JACKSON, TOWN OF
MT. CRAWFORD, TOWN OF
NARROWS, TOWN OF
NELSON COUNTY *
NEW CASTLE, CITY OF
NEW KENT COUNTY *
NEW MARKET, TOWN OF
NEWPORT NEWS, CITY OF
NORFOLK, CITY OF
County
PITTS YLVANIA
COUNTY
GRAYSON COUNTY
ALLEGHANY
COUNTY
LANCESTER COUNTY
ISLE OF WIGHT
COUNTY
JAMES CITY COUNTY
GREENSVILLE
COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
KING AND QUEEN CO
KING GEORGE
COUNTY
KING WILLIAM
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
LOUDOUN COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
LOUDOUN COUNTY
LOUISA COUNTY
LUNENBURG
COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
MADISON COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
INDEPENDENT CITY
SMYTH COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
MATHEWS COUNTY
DINWIDDIE COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FREDERICK COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
NELSON COUNTY
CRAIG COUNTY
NEW KENT COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
INDEPENDENT CITY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/02/79(R)
02/01/85(R)
01/16/87(R)
08/04/87(R)
08/19/91(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
10/08/82(R)
1 0/30/8 1(R)
09/05/90(R)
12/15/90(R)
02/06/9 1(R)
03/04/88(R)
07/17/78(R)
01/16/87(R)
03/04/87(R)
09/30/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
01/05/78(R)
06/01/89(R)
02/25/83(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/01/78(R)
04/03/89(R)
09/29/78(R)
01/03/79(R)
11/01/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
02/04/87(R)
1 1/20/8 1(R)
08/15/78(R)
01/18/89(R)
08/03/84(R)
10/17/78(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/15/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
02/22/90(R)
12/05/90(R)
1 0/23/8 1(R)
05/02/77(R)
08/01/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/15/83
02/01/85(M)
01/16/87
08/04/87
08/19/91
02/06/91
10/08/82(M)
1 0/30/8 1(M)
09/05/90
12/15/90
02/06/91
08/03/92
05/16/95
01/16/87
03/04/87
09/30/82
04/06/00
11/01/85
11/05/97
02/25/83(M)
08/23/99
11/16/83
04/03/89
01/05/95
01/05/95
05/17/89
04/01/81
08/03/92
(NSFHA)
08/15/78
08/03/92
08/03/84(M)
01/06/94
09/10/84(M)
06/05/85
09/15/78
08/01/78
02/02/90
12/05/90
1 0/23/8 1(M)
01/17/86
07/16/96
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510105#
510107#
510108#
510307#
510124#
510298#
510203#
510366
510109#
510228
510252#
510229
510069#
510087#
510112#
510302#
510113#
510337#
510183#
515529#
510177#
510117#
510239#
510204#
510119#
510125#
510126#
510231#
510232#
510127#
510128#
510056#
510070#
510163#
510310#
510129#
510079#
510190#
510130#
510205#
510133#
510291#
510317#
510141#
510191#
Community Name
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY *
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY *
NORTON, CITY OF
NOTTOWAY COUNTY*
OCCOQUAN, TOWN OF
ONANCOCK, TOWN OF
ORANGE COUNTY *
ORANGE, TOWN OF
PAGE COUNTY *
PAMPLIN, TOWN OF
PATRICK COUNTY *
PEARISBURG, TOWN OF
PEMBROKE, TOWN OF
PENNINGTON GAP, TOWN OF
PETERSBURG, CITY OF
PHENIX, TOWN OF
PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY *
POCAHONTAS, TOWN OF
POQUOSON, CITY OF
PORTSMOUTH, CITY OF
POUND, TOWN OF
POWHATAN COUNTY *
PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY *
PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY *
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY *
PULASKI COUNTY *
PULASKI, TOWN OF
PURCELLVILLE, TOWN OF
QUANTICO, TOWN OF
RADFORD, CITY OF
RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY *
REMINGTON, TOWN OF
RICH CREEK, TOWN OF
RICHLANDS, TOWN OF
RICHMOND COUNTY *
RICHMOND, CITY OF
RIDGEWAY, TOWN OF
ROANOKE COUNTY *
ROANOKE, CITY OF
ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY *
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY*
ROCKY MOUNT, TOWN OF
RUSSELL COUNTY*
SALEM, CITY OF
SALTVILLE, TOWN OF
County
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
NORTHUMBERLAND
CO.
INDEPENDENT CITY
NOTTOWAY COUNTY
PRINCE WILLIAM
COUNT
ACCOMACK COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
APPOMATTOX
COUNTY
PATRICK COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
PITTSYLVANIA
COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
INDEPENDENT CITY
WISE COUNTY
POWHATAN COUNTY
PRINCE EDWARD
COUNTY
PRINCE GEORGE
COUNTY
PRINCE WILLIAM
COUNT
PULASKI COUNTY
PULASKI COUNTY
LOUDOUN COUNTY
PRINCE WILLIAM
COUNT
INDEPENDENT CITY
RAPPAHANNOCK
COUNTY
FAUQUIER COUNTY
GILES COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
HENRY COUNTY
ROANOKE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ROCKBRIDGE
COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
SMYTH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/11/76(R)
07/04/89(R)
02/16/77(R)
09/01/87(R)
09/01/78(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/10/84(R)
10/17/97
08/19/91(R)
02/12/76(R)
05/15/84(R)
1 1/20/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
02/25/83(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
09/14/83(R)
05/16/77(R)
07/02/7 1(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/15/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
05/01/80(R)
12/01/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
11/15/89(R)
08/15/78(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/24/84(R)
03/18/80(R)
08/15/78(R)
04/04/83(R)
03/16/89(R)
06/15/79(R)
1 1/06/8 1(R)
10/17/78(R)
1 1/04/8 1(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/29/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
03/01/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/20/98
07/20/98
07/17/89
09/01/87(L)
01/05/95
12/15/81
09/30/95
08/19/91
(NSFHA)
03/05/90
(NSFHA)
08/01/78
09/04/86
03/16/81
02/25/83(M)
11/04/81
08/15/83
08/03/92
11/02/83
03/02/81
09/15/78
09/01/78
05/01/80
01/05/95
12/19/97
12/19/97
11/15/89
01/05/95
10/09/81
08/03/98
03/18/80
08/15/78
04/04/83
03/16/89
07/20/98
1 1/06/8 1(M)
10/18/95
10/18/95
04/06/00
09/03/92
11/08/99
03/16/88
10/18/95
03/01/78
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510003#
510142#
510007#
510147#
510248#
510081#
510184#
510153#
510315#
510308#
510088#
515530#
510154#
510251
510255#
510155#
510064#
510159#
510149
510111#
510156#
510157#
510192#
510004#
510049#
510160#
510164#
510139#
510233A
510021#
510292#
510053#
510131#
515531#
510005#
510166#
510057#
510168#
510288A
515532#
510146#
510083#
Community Name
SAXIS, TOWN OF
SCOTT COUNTY *
SCOTTSVILLE, TOWN OF
SHENANDOAH COUNTY *
SHENANDOAH, TOWN OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
SMYTH COUNTY *
SOUTH BOSTON, CITY OF
SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY *
SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY*
ST. CHARLES, TOWN OF
ST. PAUL, TOWN OF
STAFFORD COUNTY *
STANDARDSVILLE, TOWN OF
STANLEY, TOWN OF
STAUNTON, CITY OF
STEPHENS CITY, TOWN OF
STONY CREEK, TOWN OF
STRASBURG, TOWN OF
STUART, TOWN OF
SUFFOLK, CITY OF
SURRY COUNTY *
SUSSEX COUNTY *
TANGIER, TOWN OF
TAPPAHANNOCK, TOWN OF
TAZEWELL COUNTY *
TAZEWELL, TOWN OF
TIMBERVILLE, TOWN OF
TOMS BROOK, TOWN OF
TROUTVILLE, TOWN OF
URBANNA, TOWN OF
VIENNA, TOWN OF
VINTON, TOWN OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, CITY OF
WACHAPREAGUE, TOWN OF
WARREN COUNTY *
WARRENTON, TOWN OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY*
WASHINGTON, TOWN OF
WAYNESBORO, CITY OF
WEBER CITY, TOWN OF
WEST POINT, TOWN OF
County
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
FLUVANNA COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
ISLE OF WIGHT
COUNTY
SMYTH COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
SOUTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SPOTSYLVANIA
COUNTY
LEE COUNTY
RUSSELL COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
STAFFORD COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
PAGE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
FREDERICK COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
PATRICK COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
SURRY COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
ESSEX COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
TAZEWELL COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
BOTETOURT COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
FAIRFAX COUNTY
ROANOKE COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
WARREN COUNTY
FAUQUIER COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RAPPAHANNOCK
COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
SCOTT COUNTY
KING WILLIAM
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/17/82(R)
11/01/79(R)
09/05/79(R)
08/01/78(R)
10/16/81(R)
12/05/90(R)
05/15/80(R)
03/15/78(R)
12/15/82(R)
12/01/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/04/70(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/26/78(R)
06/18/82(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/16/82(R)
12/26/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
11/16/90(R)
1 1/02/90(R)
03/02/83(R)
10/15/82(R)
08/04/87(R)
09/01/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
10/14/77(R)
11/03/89(R)
02/03/82(R)
03/15/78(R)
04/23/7 1(R)
09/02/82(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/01/79(R)
03/16/88(R)
08/11/94
07/02/7 1(R)
11/15/78(R)
06/18/90(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/17/82
11/01/79
04/02/90
08/01/78
10/16/81(M)
12/05/90
11/05/97
03/15/78
12/15/82
02/18/98
09/04/86
05/17/88
03/03/92
(NSFHA)
02/03/82
12/16/88
09/10/84(M)
09/16/82
(NSFHA)
05/03/90
11/16/90
1 1/02/90
03/02/83
08/03/92
08/04/87
08/02/94
08/15/83
06/05/85
09/10/84(M)
10/14/77
11/03/89
02/03/82
10/18/95
12/05/96
09/02/82
05/01/80
08/01/79
03/16/88
02/04/77
05/04/88
11/15/78
06/18/90
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
510250#
510235B
510294#
510295#
510174#
510179#
510150B
510180#
510181#
510182#
Community Name
WESTMORELAND COUNTY*
WHITE STONE, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSBURG, CITY OF
WINDSOR, TOWN OF
WISE COUNTY *
WISE, TOWN OF
WOODSTOCK, TOWN OF
WYTHE COUNTY *
WYTHEVILLE, TOWN OF
YORK COUNTY *
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
County
WESTMORELAND
COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ISLE OF WIGHT
COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
WISE COUNTY
SHENANDOAH
COUNTY
WYTHE COUNTY
WYTHE COUNTY
YORK COUNTY
266
262
8
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/18/87(R)
09/24/84(R)
1 1/20/8 1(R)
08/01/90(R)
08/17/81(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/01/79(R)
04/03/78(R)
12/16/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/03/92
09/24/84(M)
03/02/94
08/01/90(L)
08/02/94
04/15/81
08/03/84(M)
02/01/79
08/22/80
12/16/88
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 33
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 4
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 2
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
510260A
510045#
510300#
510144#
510066#
510268A
510316A
510277A
510259A
510379#
510258A
510326
510332A
510299A
510284#
510173#
Community Name
** VIRGINIA
ALBERTA, TOWN OF
CLINTWOOD, TOWN OF
DENDRON, TOWN OF
DUNGANNON, TOWN OF
GALAX, CITY OF
GORDONVILLE, TOWN OF
HILLSBORO, TOWN OF
KELLER, TOWN OF
LOVETTSVILLE, TOWN OF
MONTEREY, TOWN OF
NEWSOMS, TOWN OF
NICKELSVILLE, TOWN OF
PORT ROYAL, TOWN OF
SCOTTSBURG, TOWN OF
WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF
WINCHESTER, CITY OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
County
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
DICKENSON COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
ORANGE COUNTY
LOUDOUN COUNTY
ACCOMACK COUNTY
LOUDOUN COUNTY
HIGHLAND COUNTY
SOUTHAMPTON
COUNTY
SCOTT COUNTY
CAROLINE COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
SUSSEX COUNTY
INDEPENDENT CITY
0
4
1
Hazard Area
Identified
02/25/77
02/06/9 1(F)
1 1/02/90(F)
07/16/79(F)
09/29/78(F)
02/25/77
04/04/75
04/01/77
04/15/77
12/20/00(F)
02/04/77
07/02/76
07/22/77
05/27/77
07/23/82(F)
11/15/78(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
02/25/78
03/04/78
12/02/92(8)
12/02/92(8)
06/01/82(W)
02/25/78
04/04/76
04/01/78
04/15/78
01/12/01(8)
02/04/78
07/02/77
07/22/78
05/27/78
08/26/78
11/15/78(8)
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 15
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 15
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530058#
530001#
530206#
530072#
530107#
530317
530271#
530007#
530008#
530073#
530307#
530025#
530242#
530074#
530199#
530010#
530237#
530100#
530272#
530273#
530274#
530075#
530093#
530275#
530037#
530276#
530139#
530189#
530321#
530153#
530026#
530076#
530016#
530277#
530278#
530103#
530334
530104#
530015#
530017#
530175#
530186#
530021#
530024#
530096#
Communities Participating
Community Name
"WASHINGTON
ABERDEEN, CITY OF
ADAMS COUNTY *
ALBION, TOWN OF
ALGONA, CITY OF
ALMIRA, TOWN OF
ANACORTES, CITY OF
ARLINGTON, CITY OF
ASOTIN COUNTY*
ASOTIN, CITY OF
AUBURN, CITY OF
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, CITY OF
The city's name was changed effective March 1, 1991,
formerly known as the City of Winslow.
BATTLE GROUND, CITY OF
BEAUX ARTS VILLAGE, TOWN OF
BELLEVUE, CITY OF
BELLINGHAM, CITY OF
BENTON CITY, TOWN OF
BENTON COUNTY *
BINGEN, TOWN OF
BLACK DIAMOND, TOWN OF
ELAINE, CITY OF
BONNEY LAKE, CITY OF
BOTHELL, CITY OF
BREMERTON, CITY OF
BREWSTER, TOWN OF
BRIDGEPORT, TOWN OF
BRIER, CITY OF
BUCKLEY, CITY OF
BUCODA, TOWN OF
BURIEN, CITY OF
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
CAMAS, CITY OF
CARNATION, TOWN OF
CASHMERE, CITY OF
CASTLE ROCK, CITY OF
CATHLAMET, TOWN OF
CENTRALIA, CITY OF
CHEHALIS RESERVATION, TRIBE OF
CHEHALIS, CITY OF
CHELAN COUNTY *
CHELAN, CITY OF
CHENEY, CITY OF
CHEWELAH, CITY OF
CLALLAM COUNTY *
CLARK COUNTY *
CLE ELUM, CITY OF
in the National Flood Program
County
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
ASOTIN COUNTY
ASOTIN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
KLICKITAT COUNTY
KING COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
KING COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
WAHKIAKUM
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
GRAY HARBOR
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/16/84(R)
10/01/90(R)
08/01/78(R)
05/25/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/06/98
11/16/83(R)
11/11/88(R)
01/06/88(R)
06/01/81(R)
02/05/86(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
02/04/00(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/02/82(R)
07/16/79(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/30/79(R)
07/16/79(R)
04/26/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
08/15/79(R)
09/01/77(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
09/30/94(R)
01/03/85(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
03/04/80(R)
12/01/77(R)
06/18/80(R)
09/29/86(R)
06/01/82(R)
1 1/28/97
05/01/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
01/05/78(R)
11/06/79(R)
02/05/86(R)
11/05/80(R)
08/02/82(R)
05/05/81(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/16/84
10/01/90(L)
08/01/78
(NSFHA)
09/30/88
11/08/99
01/06/88
01/06/88(M)
11/08/99
02/05/86
04/15/81
(NSFHA)
11/08/99
09/02/82
07/16/79
06/15/94
09/24/84(M)
1 1/08/99
07/16/79
05/01/80
1 1/08/99
08/15/79
08/09/99
06/05/85(M)
1 1/08/99
05/01/80
09/02/81
1 1/08/99
01/03/85
02/18/81
1 1/08/99
12/01/77
09/30/93
09/29/86
06/01/82
05/01/80
06/05/89
01/05/78
11/06/79(M)
02/05/86
02/23/01
07/19/00
10/15/81
Page Iof8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530207A
530195
530244#
530029#
530187#
530118#
530154#
530280#
530059#
530050
530281#
530339
530032#
530108#
530132#
530233#
530030#
530176#
530077#
530036#
530282#
530038#
530283#
530328#
530163#
530234#
530060#
530208#
530018
530319#
530051#
530164#
530200#
530177#
530295#
530322#
530201#
530041#
530140#
530141#
530022#
530044#
530047#
530209#
530142#
530285#
530101#
530218#
530219
Community Name
COLFAX, CITY OF
COLLEGE PLACE, CITY OF
COLTON, TOWN OF
COLUMBIA COUNTY*
COLVILLE, CITY OF
CONCONULLY, TOWN OF
CONCRETE, TOWN OF
CONNELL, TOWN OF
COSMOPOLIS, TOWN OF
COULEE CITY, TOWN OF
COUPEVILLE, TOWN OF
COVINGTON, CITY OF
King County FIRM Map Panel No. 1280F, 1257F, 1259F
COWLITZ COUNTY *
CRESTON, TOWN OF
CUSICK, TOWN OF
DARRINGTON, TOWN OF
DAYTON, CITY OF
DEER PARK, CITY OF
DBS MOINES, CITY OF
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DUVALL, TOWN OF
EAST WENATCHEE, TOWN OF
EATONVILLE, TOWN OF
EDGEWOOD, CITY OF
USE THE PIERCE COUNTY [530138] FIRM DATED
8-4-88.
EDMONDS, CITY OF
ELLENSBURG, CITY OF
ELMA, CITY OF
ENDICOTT, TOWN OF
ENTIAT, TOWN OF
ENUMCLAW, CITY OF
EPHRATA, CITY OF
EVERETT, CITY OF
EVERSON, CITY OF
FAIRFIELD, TOWN OF
FARMINGTON,TOWN OF
FEDERAL WAY, CITY OF
FERNDALE, TOWN OF
FERRY COUNTY *
FIFE, CITY OF
FIRCREST, CITY OF
FORKS, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN COUNTY *
GARFIELD COUNTY*
GARFIELD, TOWN OF
GIG HARBOR, TOWN OF
GOLD BAR, TOWN OF
GOLDENDALE, CITY OF
GRANDVIEW, CITY OF
GRANGER, TOWN OF
County
WHITMAN COUNTY
WALLA WALLA
COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ISLAND COUNTY
KING COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
KING COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
FERRY COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
KLICKITAT COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/78(R)
05/26/78(R)
07/02/79(R)
05/04/88(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/30/77(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/28/79(R)
1 1/03/82(R)
06/15/79(R)
10/15/97(R)
04/19/01(R)
08/01/80(R)
05/12/94
06/19/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/04/88(R)
12/26/79(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
06/04/80(R)
07/03/85(R)
05/29/01(R)
04/10/97(R)
08/08/78(R)
05/05/81(R)
08/19/85(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/03/84(R)
02/1 5/9 1(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/03/78(R)
08/02/82(R)
10/16/79(R)
07/03/85(R)
06/21/96(R)
06/01/83(R)
04/17/85(R)
1 1/05/80(R)
02/03/82(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/01/80(R)
12/01/99
08/01/78(R)
09/02/8 1(R)
12/01/83(R)
08/17/81(R)
05/25/84(R)
12/22/80(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/01/78(M)
(NSFHA)
07/02/79
07/19/00
06/05/85(M)
09/30/77
08/02/82
09/28/79
1 1/03/82
(NSFHA)
08/16/95
07/07/99
09/30/88
06/19/85(M)
11/08/99
07/19/00
12/26/79(M)
11/08/99
05/17/82
1 1/08/99
07/03/85(M)
07/03/86
1 1/08/99
05/05/81
08/19/85
07/17/78
(NSFHA)
1 1/08/99
09/30/88
1 1/08/99
08/02/82
10/16/79(M)
07/03/85(M)
1 1/08/99
06/01/83
06/16/99
1 1/05/80
02/03/82
12/16/88
05/01/80
11/15/77
08/01/78
09/02/81
11/08/99
08/17/81
05/25/84(M)
(NSFHA)
Page 2 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530287#
530049#
530057#
530155#
530220#
530110#
530052#
530329
530061#
530127#
530166#
530314#
530312#
530079#
530069#
530045#
530289#
530033#
530336#
53001 1#
530080#
530071#
530081#
530092#
530095#
530098#
530099#
530248#
530156#
530190#
530082#
530291#
530333#
530292#
530019#
530102#
530106#
530003#
530128#
530034#
530316#
530331
530157#
530202#
530167#
530221
530168#
530115#
530062#
Community Name
GRANITE FALLS, TOWN OF
GRANT COUNTY*
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY*
HAMILTON, TOWN OF
HARRAH, TOWN OF
HARRINGTON, TOWN OF
HARTLINE, TOWN OF
HOH INDIAN TRIBE, EORKS
HOQUIAM, CITY OF
ILWACO, TOWN OF
INDEX, TOWN OF
IONE, TOWN OF
ISLAND COUNTY *
ISSAQUAH, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
KAHLOTUS, TOWN OF
KALAMA, TOWN OF
KELSO, CITY OF
KENMORE, CITY OF
USE THE KING COUNTY (530071) FIRM DATED 3-30-98.
KENNEWICK, CITY OF
KENT, CITY OF
KING COUNTY*
KIRKLAND, CITY OF
KITSAP COUNTY *
KITTITAS COUNTY *
KITTITAS, TOWN OF
KLICKITAT COUNTY *
LA CENTER, CITY OF
LA CONNER, TOWN OF
LACEY, CITY OF
LAKE FOREST PARK, CITY OF
LAKE STEVENS, CITY OF
LAKEWOOD, CITY OF
USE THE PIERCE COUNTY (530138) FIRM DATED
8-4-88.
LANGLEY, CITY OF
LEAVENWORTH, CITY OF
LEWIS COUNTY *
LINCOLN COUNTY *
LIND, TOWN OF
LONG BEACH, TOWN OF
LONGVIEW, CITY OF
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE
LUMMI INDIAN RESERVATION, TRIBE OF
LYMAN, TOWN OF
LYNDEN, CITY OF
LYNNWOOD, CITY OF
MABTON, TOWN OF
MARYSVILLE, CITY OF
MASON COUNTY*
MCCLEARY, TOWN OF
County
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
PACIFIC COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
ISLAND COUNTY
KING COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
KING COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
KLICKITAT COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
ISLAND COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
PACIFIC COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/14/01(R)
03/08/89(R)
09/29/86(R)
12/01/81(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/12/94(R)
03/04/85(R)
04/25/97
06/15/79(R)
02/01/79(R)
12/01/83(R)
04/17/85(R)
12/01/81(R)
05/01/80(R)
07/19/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
06/01/81(R)
12/04/79(R)
11/13/98(R)
08/15/79(R)
04/01/81(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/05/81(R)
04/15/82(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
12/03/86(R)
12/18/84(R)
07/16/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
04/17/89(R)
1 l/28/97(R)
09/24/84(R)
01/05/78(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/01/79(R)
12/18/79(R)
09/16/81(R)
10/14/97
07/19/82(R)
11/03/82(R)
06/05/85(R)
09/01/81(R)
02/15/84(R)
05/24/91(R)
08/16/82(R)
Current Effective
Map
1 1/08/99
09/30/88
02/16/90
12/01/81
09/30/88
03/04/85(M)
06/15/79
02/01/79
1 1/08/99
04/17/85(M)
08/16/95
11/08/99
07/19/82
04/15/80
06/01/81
09/02/93
06/15/94
1 1/08/99
11/08/99
1 1/08/99
05/15/80
12/06/99
04/15/82
07/02/81
09/29/86
12/18/84
07/16/80
11/08/99
11/08/99
08/16/95
01/05/78
12/15/81
09/30/88
09/30/92
08/01/79
09/02/93
02/23/01
07/19/82
11/03/82
11/08/99
(NSFHA)
1 1/08/99
12/08/98
08/16/82
Page 3 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530179
530315#
530083#
530252
530136#
530135#
530330#
530180
530294#
530169#
530063#
530105#
530053#
530158#
530170#
530235#
530256#
530223#
530137
530203#
530084#
530085#
530068#
530210#
530064#
530065#
530111#
530117#
530119#
530191#
530120#
530121#
530143#
530126#
530086#
53021 1#
530046A
530258
530296#
530131B
530138#
530048#
530023#
530094#
530070#
530241#
Community Name
MEDICAL LAKE, TOWN OF
MEDINA, CITY OF
MERCER ISLAND, CITY OF
MESA, CITY OF
METALINE FALLS, TOWN OF
METALINE, TOWN OF
MILL CREEK, CITY OF
USE THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY ( 535534) FIRM DATED
9-30-92.
MILLWOOD, TOWN OF
MILTON, CITY OF
MONROE, CITY OF
MONTESANO, CITY OF
MORTON, CITY OF
MOSES LAKE, CITY OF
MOUNT VERNON, CITY OF
MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, CITY OF
MUKILTEO, CITY OF
N. BONNEVILLE, TOWN OF
NACHES, TOWN OF
NEWPORT, CITY OF
NOOKSACK, CITY OF
NORMANDY PARK, CITY OF
NORTH BEND, CITY OF
OAK HARBOR, CITY OF
OAKESDALE, TOWN OF
OAKVILLE, TOWN OF
OCEAN SHORES, CITY OF
ODESSA, TOWN OF
OKANOGAN COUNTY *
OKANOGAN, CITY OF
OLYMPIA, CITY OF
OMAK, CITY OF
OROVILLE, TOWN OF
ORTING, TOWN OF
PACIFIC COUNTY *
PACIFIC, CITY OF
PALOUSE, CITY OF
PASCO, CITY OF
PATEROS, TOWN OF
PE ELL, TOWN OF
PEND OREILLE COUNTY *
PIERCE COUNTY*
POMEROY, CITY OF
PORT ANGELES, CITY OF
PORT ORCHARD, CITY OF
PORT TOWNSEND, CITY OF
POULSBO, CITY OF
County
SPOKANE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
KING COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SKAMANIA COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
ISLAND COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PACIFIC COUNTY
KING COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
FRANKLIN COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
PEND OREILLE
COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
GARFIELD COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
1 1/08/84(R)
03/16/79(R)
06/30/97(R)
09/28/79(R)
04/17/85(R)
04/17/85(R)
07/09/97(R)
06/15/79(R)
04/26/82(R)
12/01/83(R)
05/10/77(R)
12/04/79(R)
01/05/89(R)
01/03/85(R)
08/19/85(R)
02/19/86(R)
05/28/84(R)
01/19/83(R)
06/30/76(R)
09/02/82(R)
11/02/77(R)
08/01/84(R)
01/15/80(R)
09/29/78(R)
06/19/85(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/15/79(R)
09/30/77(R)
02/17/82(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
01/05/78(R)
12/02/80(R)
07/17/78(R)
05/10/77(R)
02/12/76(R)
03/04/80(R)
04/17/85(R)
08/19/87(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
11/15/79(R)
03/15/82(R)
07/02/79(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
04/17/85(M)
04/17/85(M)
1 1/08/99
(NSFHA)
02/17/82
1 1/08/99
10/13/81(M)
03/02/82
01/05/89
01/03/85
1 1/08/99
11/08/99
10/20/00
01/19/83
(NSFHA)
09/02/82
11/08/99
11/08/99
08/16/95
09/29/78
06/19/85
03/01/78
09/30/88
12/20/00
08/02/95
02/17/82
11/16/82
11/30/82
09/27/85
09/27/85
11/08/99
07/17/78
05/10/77(M)
(NSFHA)
03/04/80
04/17/85(M)
08/04/88
09/30/93
09/28/90
11/15/79
03/15/82
08/11/81
Page 4 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530259A
530012#
530212#
530144#
530335
530054
530260
530129#
530087#
530088#
535533#
530298#
530005#
530122#
530181#
530213#
530299#
530262#
530214#
530337
530149#
530320#
530089#
530159#
530226#
530301
530116#
530327#
530151#
530160#
530326
530236#
535534#
530171#
530090#
530130#
530263#
530145#
530182#
530174#
530183#
530113#
530264
530172#
53003 1#
530146#
530185#
530161A
530173#
530204#
530147#
530227
530148#
Community Name
PRESCOTT, TOWN OF
PROSSER, CITY OF
PULLMAN, CITY OF
PUYALLUP, CITY OF
QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE
QUINCY, CITY OF
RAINIER, TOWN OF
RAYMOND, CITY OF
REDMOND, CITY OF
RENTON, CITY OF
RICHLAND, CITY OF
RIDGEFIELD, TOWN OF
RITZVILLE, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE, TOWN OF
ROCKFORD,TOWN OF
ROSALIA, TOWN OF
ROSLYN,CITY OF
ROY, TOWN OF
SAINT JOHN, TOWN OF
SAMMAMISH, CITY OF
SAN JUAN COUNTY*
SEATAC, CITY OF
SEATTLE, CITY OF
SEDRO WOOLLEY, CITY OF
SELAH, TOWN OF
SEQUIM, CITY OF
SHELTON, CITY OF
SHORELINE, CITY OF
THE CITY OF SHORELINE HAS ADOPTED THE KING
COUNTY [530071] FIRM DATED 5/20/96.
SKAGIT COUNTY *
SKAMANIA COUNTY *
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE
SKYKOMISH, TOWN OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY *
SNOHOMISH, CITY OF
SNOQUALMIE, CITY OF
SOUTH BEND, CITY OF
SOUTH CLE ELUM, CITY OF
SOUTH PRAIRIE, TOWN OF
SPANGLE, TOWN OF
SPOKANE COUNTY*
SPOKANE, CITY OF
SPRAGUE, CITY OF
SPRINGDALE, TOWN OF
STANWOOD, CITY OF
STARBUCK, CITY OF
STEILACOOM, TOWN OF
STEVENS COUNTY *
STEVENSON, TOWN OF
SULTAN, CITY OF
SUMAS, CITY OF
SUMNER,CITY OF
SUNNYSIDE, CITY OF
TACOMA, CITY OF
County
WALLA WALLA
COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
PACIFIC COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
CLALLAM COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SKAGIT COUNTY
SKAMANIA COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
KING COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
KING COUNTY
PACIFIC COUNTY
KITTITAS COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
SKAMANIA COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/18/97
06/30/76(R)
07/02/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/08/98
06/30/76(R)
03/29/99(R)
07/16/79(R)
02/01/79(R)
05/05/81(R)
03/31/70(R)
05/19/81(R)
08/04/88(R)
03/01/78(R)
10/02/79(R)
07/17/78(R)
06/05/85(R)
04/26/82(R)
05/26/81(R)
05/25/00(R)
03/01/91(R)
09/30/94(R)
07/19/77(R)
07/05/82(R)
05/03/82(R)
02/11/76(R)
12/01/83(R)
03/04/97(R)
01/03/85(R)
08/05/86(R)
02/17/95
07/02/8 1(R)
03/15/84(R)
11/16/83(R)
07/05/84(R)
11/15/79(R)
05/05/81(R)
12/15/81(R)
09/18/79(R)
05/17/88(R)
08/01/80(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/01/99(R)
11/16/83(R)
05/04/88(R)
07/19/82(R)
09/14/90(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/30/83(R)
05/15/85(R)
12/16/80(R)
07/04/78(R)
12/01/83(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/04/77
10/13/81(M)
05/19/81
08/15/80
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/16/79
1 1/08/99
11/08/99
03/01/84
05/19/81
08/04/88
01/05/82
06/18/87(M)
07/17/78
06/05/85(M)
03/15/82
05/26/81(M)
12/18/85
03/01/91(L)
11/08/99
11/08/99
12/05/89
03/02/98
(NSFHA)
12/01/83
09/29/89
08/05/86(M)
11/08/99
11/08/99
1 1/08/99
1 1/08/99
11/15/79
05/05/81
12/15/81
09/18/79(M)
09/30/92
10/17/86
09/30/88
04/01/99(L)
1 1/08/99
07/19/00
07/19/82
08/16/96
07/17/86(M)
11/08/99
05/15/85
06/18/87
(NSFHA)
12/01/83
Page 5 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
530215#
530302#
530188#
530265#
530303#
530123#
530228#
530091#
530192#
530124#
530229#
530216#
530332#
530266#
530027#
530193#
530196#
530194#
530197
530230#
530304
530028#
530006#
530040
530020#
530014#
530067#
530198B
530305#
530205#
530114#
530268#
530056#
530306#
530125#
530324#
530035#
530269
530217#
530311#
530310#
530232B
Community Name
TEKOA, CITY OF
TENINO, CITY OF
THURSTON COUNTY *
TIETON, TOWN OF
TOLEDO, CITY OF
TONASKET, TOWN OF
TOPPENISH, CITY OF
TUKWILA, CITY OF
TUMWATER, CITY OF
TWISP, TOWN OF
UNION GAP, CITY OF
UNIONTOWN, TOWN OF
UNIVERSITY PLACE, CITY OF
USE THE PIERCE COUNTY (530138) FIRM DATED
8-4-88.
VADER, TOWN OF
VANCOUVER, CITY OF
WAHKIAKUM COUNTY *
WAITSBURG, CITY OF
WALLA WALLA COUNTY *
WALLA WALLA, CITY OF
WAPATO, CITY OF
WARDEN, TOWN OF
WASHOUGAL, CITY OF
WASHTUCNA, TOWN OF
WATERVILLE, TOWN OF
WENATCHEE, CITY OF
WEST RICHLAND, TOWN OF
WESTPORT, CITY OF
WHATCOM COUNTY *
WHITE SALMON, TOWN OF
WHITMAN COUNTY *
WILBUR, TOWN OF
WILKESON, TOWN OF
WILSON CREEK, TOWN OF
WINLOCK, TOWN OF
WINTHROP, TOWN OF
WOODINVILLE, CITY OF
WOODLAND, CITY OF
YACOLT, TOWN OF
YAKIMA COUNTY *
YAKIMA, CITY OF
YELM, CITY OF
ZILLAH, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
County
WHITMAN COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
KING COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
WAHKIAKUM
COUNTY
WALLA WALLA
COUNTY
WALLA WALLA
COUNTY
WALLA WALLA
COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CHELAN COUNTY
BENTON COUNTY
GRAYS HARBOR
COUNTY
WHATCOM COUNTY
KLICKITAT COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
KING COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
COWLITZ COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
THURSTON COUNTY
YAKIMA COUNTY
284
274
21
33
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/01/79(R)
06/04/80(R)
12/01/82(R)
03/18/85(R)
11/19/80(R)
01/05/78(R)
07/17/78(R)
08/03/81(R)
08/01/80(R)
07/18/77(R)
05/02/83(R)
08/01/78(R)
1 l/28/97(R)
01/17/97(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/28/90(R)
11/03/82(R)
12/01/83(R)
03/30/8 1(R)
07/17/78(R)
05/29/79(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
09/30/88(R)
09/17/84(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/30/8 1(R)
05/05/81(R)
09/30/77(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/01/80(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/01/82(R)
07/15/88(R)
09/14/79(R)
1 1/02/77(R)
10/10/97(R)
02/01/78(R)
12/14/95
06/05/85(R)
12/15/81(R)
06/19/99(R)
06/30/76(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/01/79
06/04/80
06/16/99
03/18/85(M)
11/05/80
01/05/78
07/17/78
11/08/99
04/03/84
07/18/77
03/02/98
08/01/78
09/14/79
08/17/81
09/28/90
11/03/82
12/01/83
(NSFHA)
07/17/78
(NSFHA)
05/17/82
09/30/88(M)
(NSFHA)
01/06/94
09/30/81
05/05/81
09/28/90
03/18/85(M)
05/01/80
09/30/88
03/01/82
07/15/88
09/14/79
1 1/02/77
1 1/08/99
09/04/85
07/02/76
03/02/98
03/02/98
06/16/99
06/30/76(M)
Page 6 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 10
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 4
IDENTIFIED
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Emer or Reg] Map
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
** WASHINGTON
530318# CLARKSTON, CITY OF
530109# DAVENPORT, CITY OF
530245# DUPONT, TOWN OF
530246 ELMER CITY, TOWN OF
530150A FRIDAY HARBOR, TOWN OF
530178 LATAH, TOWN OF
530250 MALDEN, TOWN OF
530257 NORTHPORT, TOWN OF
530112# REARDAN, TOWN OF
530300# RUSTON, TOWN OF
530308# WOODWAY, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
ASOTIN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
OKANOGAN COUNTY
SAN JUAN COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
WHITMAN COUNTY
STEVENS COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
0
1
0
11
11
Hazard Area
Identified
01/06/88(F)
05/24/74
09/15/83(F)
08/22/75
11/29/74
12/06/74
07/18/75
07/09/76
01/10/75
07/03/86(F)
07/03/86(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
05/17/75
09/30/88(8)
09/07/83
08/22/76
11/29/75
12/06/75
07/18/76
07/09/77
01/10/76
12/03/77
09/19/76
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 8 of 8
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
540204#
540161#
54004 1#
540054#
540262A
540165#
54000 1#
5400 17#
540098#
540005#
540240#
540170#
540002#
54007 1#
540253#
540108#
540282#
540012#
540275
540267#
540140
540285
540007#
540125#
540009#
540055#
54001 1#
540162#
540199#
540166#
540010#
540016#
540179#
540020#
540205#
540287#
540046
540072#
540232#
540092#
540066#
540073#
540074#
540048#
540056#
540022#
Communities Participating in
Community Name
"WEST VIRGINIA
ADDISION, TOWN OF (WEBSTER SPRINGS)
ALBRIGHT, TOWN OF
ALDERSON, TOWN OF
ANMOORE, TOWN OF
AUBURN, TOWN OF
BANCROFT, TOWN OF
BARBOUR COUNTY*
BARBOURSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BARRACKVILLE, TOWN OF
BATH, TOWN OF
ALSO KNOWN AS THE TOWN OF BERKELEY SPRINGS
BAYARD, TOWN OF
BECKLEY, CITY OF
BELINGTON, TOWN OF
BELLE, TOWN OF
BELMONT, TOWN OF
BENWOOD, CITY OF
BERKELEY COUNTY *
BETHANY, TOWN OF
BETHLEHEM, VILLAGE OF
BEVERLY, TOWN OF
BLACKSVILLE, CITY OF
BLUEFIELD, CITY OF
BOONE COUNTY *
BRAMWELL, TOWN OF
BRAXTON COUNTY *
BRIDGEPORT, CITY OF
BROOKE COUNTY *
BRUCETON MILLS, TOWN OF
BUCKHANNON, CITY OF
BUFFALO, TOWN OF
BURNSVILLE, TOWN OF
CABELL COUNTY*
CAIRO, TOWN OF
CALHOUN COUNTY *
CAMDEN-ON-GAULEY, TOWN OF
CAMERON, CITY OF
CAPON BRIDGE TOWN
CEDAR GROVE, TOWN OF
CEREDO, TOWN OF
CHAPMANVILLE, TOWN OF
CHARLES TOWN, CITY OF
CHARLESTON, CITY OF
CHESAPEAKE, TOWN OF
CHESTER, CITY OF
CLARKSBURG, CITY OF
CLAY, COUNTY *
the National Flood Program
County
WEBSTER COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
CABELL COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
PLEAS ANTS COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
BROOKE COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
BRAXTON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
BROOKE COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
UPSHUR COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
BRAXTON COUNTY
CABELL COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/16/90(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/03/80(R)
09/24/84(R)
12/18/85(R)
07/01/87(R)
06/03/88(R)
03/16/88(R)
01/02/80(R)
08/10/79(R)
11/01/84(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/15/82(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
05/01/80(R)
08/04/88(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/26/77(R)
1 2/03/9 1(R)
12/26/78(R)
05/26/78(R)
04/16/91(R)
12/01/83(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
03/04/88(R)
12/15/83(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
12/18/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/04/86(R)
04/01/88(R)
06/01/82(R)
05/17/89(R)
08/27/71(R)
12/04/79(R)
06/15/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
02/15/78(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/16/90
05/02/91
09/27/91
09/03/80
09/24/84(M)
12/18/85
07/01/87(L)
06/03/88
03/16/88
03/05/96
08/10/79(M)
11/01/84
08/01/79
04/15/82
06/03/91
05/01/80
1 1/20/98
09/28/79(M)
(NSFHA)
12/03/91
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
09/06/96
12/01/83
03/18/91
03/04/88
09/28/90
08/15/90
09/04/86
12/18/85
03/18/91
09/30/87
03/18/91
03/18/91
02/16/90
09/04/86
04/01/88(L)
06/01/82
05/17/89
11/16/83
09/30/92
04/03/85
06/01/82
12/01/82
03/16/92
03/18/91
Page 1 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
540023#
540075#
540176B
540206#
540230#
540260#
540116#
540134#
540024#
540076#
540158#
540077#
540222B
540212#
540177#
540180B
540099#
540100#
540243B
540101#
540026#
540235#
540189
540013#
540202#
540154#
540259#
540117#
540237#
540294#
540135#
540035#
540078#
540109#
540036#
540190#
540038#
540102#
54002 1#
540272#
540040#
540192#
540089#
540226#
540047#
540279#
54005 1#
540178B
540067#
540053#
540247#
Community Name
CLAY, TOWN OF
CLENDENIN, TOWN OF
CO ALTON, TOWN OF
COWEN, TOWN OF
DANVILLE, TOWN OF
DAVIS, TOWN OF
DAVY, TOWN OF
DELBARTON, TOWN OF
DODDRIDGE COUNTY *
DUNBAR, CITY OF
DURBIN, TOWN OF
EAST BANK, TOWN OF
ELEANOR, TOWN OF
ELIZABETH, TOWN OF
ELKINS, CITY OF
ELLENBORO, TOWN OF
FAIRMONT,CITY OF
FAIRVIEW, TOWN OF
FALLING SPRINGS CORPORATION, CITY OF
ALSO KNOWN AS THE TOWN OF RENICK
FARMINGTON, TOWN OF
FAYETTE COUNTY*
FLATWOODS, TOWN OF
FLEMINGTON, TOWN OF
FOLLANSBEE, CITY OF
FORT GAY, TOWN OF
FRANKLIN, TOWN OF
FREINDLY, TOWN OF
GARY, CITY OF
GAS SAW AY, TOWN OF
GAULEY BRIDGE, TOWN OF
GILBERT, TOWN OF
GILMER COUNTY *
GLASGOW, TOWN OF
GLEN DALE, CITY OF
GLENVILLE, CITY OF
GRAFTON, CITY OF
GRANT COUNTY*
GRANT TOWN, TOWN OF
GRANTSVILLE, TOWN OF
GRANVILLE, TOWN OF
GREENBRIER COUNTY*
HAMBLETON, TOWN OF
HAMLIN, TOWN OF
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY*
HANCOCK COUNTY *
HANDLEY, TOWN OF
HARDY COUNTY *
HARMAN, TOWN OF
HARPERS FERRY, TOWN OF
HARRISON COUNTY*
HARTFORD, TOWN OF
County
CLAY COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
DODDRIDGE COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
WIRT COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
BRAXTON COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
BROOKE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
PENDLETON COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
BRAXTON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
GILMER COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
GILMER COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
CALHOUN COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
HARDY COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/1 8/9 1(R)
07/16/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
04/16/91(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/28/84(R)
03/15/77(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
06/01/82(R)
08/24/84(R)
06/01/82(R)
02/06/84(R)
01/17/91(R)
04/03/87(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/02/87(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/24/84(R)
03/16/88(R)
03/04/88(R)
09/29/78(R)
12/26/78(R)
09/30/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
09/01/87(R)
11/04/88(R)
02/01/85(R)
09/10/84(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
05/02/77(R)
04/16/91(R)
06/15/82(R)
04/01/80(R)
04/16/91(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/01/87(R)
03/04/88(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
12/15/83(R)
01/15/88(R)
07/20/84(R)
09/04/87(R)
08/01/87(R)
06/15/84(R)
07/05/84(R)
06/19/85(R)
08/24/84(R)
08/24/84(R)
07/04/88(R)
02/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/18/91
07/16/84
09/10/84(M)
02/16/90
09/06/96
06/02/92
09/28/84
11/01/85
03/18/91
04/03/85
10/17/89
06/01/82
02/06/84(M)
01/17/91
04/03/87
08/24/84(M)
10/18/95
03/16/88
09/24/84(M)
03/16/88
03/04/88
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
02/15/84
01/03/79
08/15/89
11/04/88
02/01/85
03/18/91
09/18/91
11/15/85
04/16/91
06/15/82
09/30/83
04/16/91
08/01/87(L)
05/04/00
03/04/88
03/18/91
1 1/02/95
09/18/91
06/02/92
09/04/87
08/01/87(L)
06/03/91
07/05/84
01/19/01
08/24/84(M)
08/24/84(M)
07/02/92
02/15/78
Page 2 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
54025 1#
540193#
540187#
540256
540018#
540167#
540264A
540118#
540063#
540086B
540065#
540003B
540070#
54022 1#
540136#
540130#
540119#
540120#
540254
540113#
540171
540085#
540281
540088#
540255B
545536#
545535#
540057#
540058#
540286#
540008#
545537#
540103#
540097#
540159#
540079#
540107#
540006#
540112#
540248#
545538#
540126#
540114#
540110#
540028#
540124#
540195#
540266A
540019#
540129#
540133#
540095#
540104#
Community Name
HENDERSON, TOWN OF
HENDRICKS,TOWN OF
HINTON, CITY OF
HUNDRED, TOWN OF
HUNTINGTON, CITY OF
HURRICANE, CITY OF
HUTTONSVILLE, TOWN OF
IAEGER, TOWN OF
JACKSON COUNTY *
JANE LEW, TOWN OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JUNIOR, TOWN OF
KANAWHA COUNTY *
KENOVA, CITY OF
KERMIT, TOWN OF
KEYSER, CITY OF
KEYSTONE, TOWN OF
KIMBALL, TOWN OF
KINGWOOD, CITY OF
LEON, TOWN OF
LESTER, TOWN OF
LEWIS COUNTY*
LEWISBURG, CITY OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LITTLETON, TOWN OF
LOGAN COUNTY *
LOGAN, CITY OF
LOST CREEK, TOWN OF
LUMBERPORT, TOWN OF
MABSCOTT, TOWN OF
MADISON, TOWN OF
MAN, TOWN OF
MANNINGTON, CITY OF
MARION COUNTY*
MARLINTON, TOWN OF
MARMET, TOWN OF
MARSHALL COUNTY *
MARTINSBURG, CITY OF
MASON COUNTY *
MASON, TOWN OF
MATEWAN, TOWN OF
MATOAKA, TOWN OF
MCDOWELL COUNTY *
MCMECHEN, CITY OF
MEADOW BRIDGE, TOWN OF
MERCER COUNTY*
MIDDLEBOURNE, TOWN OF
MILL CREEK, TOWN OF
MILTON, TOWN OF
MINERAL COUNTY *
MINGO COUNTY *
MITCHELL HEIGHTS, TOWN OF
MONONGAH, TOWN OF
County
MASON COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
SUMMERS COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
CABELL COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
BERKELEY COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
CABELL COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/15/78(R)
08/01/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
04/01/88(R)
08/17/81(R)
03/04/86(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/28/84(R)
05/01/85(R)
09/24/84(R)
10/15/80(R)
04/17/87(R)
03/18/85(R)
05/17/89(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
02/01/85(R)
02/01/85(R)
11/12/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
04/01/88(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/18/87(R)
08/24/84(R)
04/07/72(R)
07/16/71(R)
03/04/88(R)
03/04/88(R)
03/04/85(R)
04/16/91(R)
09/10/71(R)
11/19/86(R)
07/04/88(R)
10/17/89(R)
04/15/82(R)
04/17/84(R)
12/18/79(R)
01/02/80(R)
02/15/78(R)
02/03/70(R)
12/15/83(R)
09/18/86(R)
04/15/80(R)
0 1/02/9 1(R)
02/01/85(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/30/87(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
12/02/80(R)
08/13/71(R)
03/16/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/15/78
06/02/92
08/01/79
04/01/88(L)
01/17/90
03/04/86
08/24/84(M)
09/28/84
08/23/00
09/24/84(M)
01/06/99
04/17/87(M)
11/06/91
05/17/89
11/15/85
09/27/91
02/01/85
02/01/85
(NSFHA)
08/15/78
04/01/88(L)
08/18/92
(NSFHA)
08/19/91
08/24/84(M)
05/18/00
11/05/82
03/04/88
03/04/88
03/04/85
09/06/96
02/18/83
11/19/86
10/18/95
10/17/89
04/03/85
02/19/92
07/16/97
01/02/80
02/15/78
06/02/99
12/15/83
09/18/86
09/30/83
10/16/91
02/01/85
1 1/04/88
08/24/84(M)
09/30/87
10/20/99
12/04/84
12/03/82
03/16/88
Page 3 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
540139#
540278#
540029#
540265B
540052#
540144#
540141#
540111#
540280#
540218#
540049#
540249#
540208#
540268A
540146#
540081#
540121#
540059#
54003 1#
540127#
540149#
540142#
540196#
5402 14#
540194#
540252#
540032#
540153#
540182#
540039#
540143#
540004#
540131#
540210
540220#
540225#
540168#
540283#
540250#
540082#
540160A
540128#
540263B
540164#
540244#
540228#
540169#
Community Name
MONONGALIA COUNTY *
MONROE COUNTY *
MONTGOMERY, CITY OF
MONTROSE, TOWN OF
MOOREFIELD, TOWN OF
MORGAN COUNTY*
MORGANTOWN, CITY OF
MOUNDSVILLE, CITY OF
MOUNT HOPE, CITY OF
MULLENS, CITY OF
NEW CUMBERLAND, CITY OF
NEW HAVEN, TOWN OF
NEW MARTINSVILLE, CITY OF
NEWBURG,TOWN OF
NICHOLAS COUNTY*
NITRO, CITY OF
NORTHFORK, TOWN OF
NUTTER FORT, TOWN OF
OAK HILL, CITY OF
OAKVALE, TOWN OF
OHIO COUNTY *
OSAGE, TOWN OF
PADEN CITY, CITY OF
PARKERSBURG, CITY OF
PARSONS, TOWN OF
PAW PAW, TOWN OF
PAX, TOWN OF
PENDELTON COUNTY*
PENNSBORO, CITY OF
PETERSBURG, TOWN OF
PETERSTOWN, TOWN OF
PHILIPPI, CITY OF
PIEDMONT, CITY OF
PINE GROVE, TOWN OF
PINEVILLE, CITY OF
PLEASANTS COUNTY *
POCA, TOWN OF
POCAHONTAS COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE TOWN OF CASS
POINT PLEASANT, CITY OF
PRATT, TOWN OF
PRESTON COUNTY*
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PULLMAN, TOWN OF
PUTNAM COUNTY*
QUINWOOD, TOWN OF
RAINELLE, TOWN OF
RALEIGH COUNTY *
County
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
HARDY COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
MARSHALL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
NICHOLAS COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
MORGAN COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
PENDLETON COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
BARBOUR COUNTY
MINERAL COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
PLEASANTS COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
POCAHONTAS
COUNTY
MASON COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
MERCER COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/01/84(R)
01/14/83(R)
06/01/82(R)
09/24/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/15/80(R)
08/10/79(R)
08/01/79(R)
05/15/80(R)
07/03/78(R)
09/02/82(R)
08/01/87(R)
04/05/94(R)
04/15/82(R)
04/03/85(R)
09/17/80(R)
01/18/80(R)
12/15/83(R)
04/04/83(R)
09/28/79(R)
03/16/89(R)
09/04/86(R)
08/15/79(R)
1 1/02/84(R)
08/10/79(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/16/88(R)
06/18/87(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
04/01/88(R)
09/30/83(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
12/18/85(R)
10/17/89(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/01/84(R)
03/01/87(R)
02/01/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/18/87(R)
02/27/8 1(R)
11/19/87(R)
12/18/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/22/99
01/14/83(M)
06/01/82
09/24/84(M)
01/19/01
05/18/00
10/18/95
09/30/83
08/10/79(M)
08/01/79
05/15/80
07/03/78
09/02/82
08/01/87(L)
11/06/91
04/15/82
04/03/85
09/17/80
01/18/80(M)
12/15/83
09/03/92
09/28/79(M)
03/16/89
04/17/89
06/02/92
03/05/96
03/16/88
08/15/89
09/16/88(M)
05/04/00
08/01/79
09/04/86
09/27/91
04/01/88(L)
09/30/83
06/03/91
12/18/85
10/17/89
05/15/78
05/01/84
03/01/87(L)
02/01/84
09/10/84(M)
06/19/97
02/27/8 1(M)
11/19/87
11/06/91
Page 4 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
540175#
540068#
54024 1#
540269#
540184#
540147#
540064#
540224#
540105#
540183A
540276#
540043#
540163#
540044B
540242B
540037#
540069#
540060#
540197#
540258
540174#
540223#
540185#
540083#
540156#
540273#
54006 1#
540186#
540148B
540236#
540238#
540188#
540257A
54026 1#
540150#
540191#
540277#
540198#
540151#
540215#
540122#
540245A
540200#
54023 1#
540203#
5400 14#
540123#
540015#
540090#
545539#
540062
Community Name
RANDOLPH COUNTY *
RANSON, CITY OF
RAVENSWOOD, CITY OF
REEDSVILLE, TOWN OF
REEDY, TOWN OF
RICHWOOD, CITY OF
RIPLEY, CITY OF
RITCHIE COUNTY *
RIVESVILLE, TOWN OF
ROANE COUNTY *
ROMNEY, TOWN OF
RONCEVERTE, CITY OF
ROWLESBURG, TOWN OF
RUPERT, TOWN OF
SALEM, CITY OF
SAND FORK, TOWN OF
FORMERLY THE TOWN OF LAYOPOLIS
SHEPHERDSTOWN, TOWN OF
SHINNSTON, CITY OF
SISTERSVILLE, CITY OF
SMITHFIELD, TOWN OF
SOPHIA, TOWN OF
SOUTH CHARLESTON, CITY OF
SPENCER, CITY OF
ST. ALBANS, CITY OF
ST. MARY'S, CITY OF
STAR CITY, TOWN OF
STONEWOOD, TOWN OF
SUMMERS COUNTY *
SUMMERSVILLE, TOWN OF
SUTTON, TOWN OF
SYLVESTER, TOWN OF
TAYLOR COUNTY*
TERRA ALTA, TOWN OF
THOMAS, CITY OF
TRIADELPHIA, TOWN OF
TUCKER COUNTY*
TYLER COUNTY *
UPSHUR COUNTY*
VALLEY GROVE, TOWN OF
VIENNA, CITY OF
WAR, TOWN OF
WARDENSVILLE, TOWN OF
WAYNE COUNTY*
WAYNE, TOWN OF
WEBSTER COUNTY *
WEIRTON, CITY OF
WELCH, CITY OF
WELLSBURG, CITY OF
WEST HAMLIN, TOWN OF
WEST LOGAN, TOWN OF
WEST MILFORD, TOWN OF
County
RANDOLPH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
NICHOLAS COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
RITCHIE COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
GILMER COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
ROANE COUNTY
KANAWHA COUNTY
PLEAS ANTS COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
SUMMERS COUNTY
NICHOLAS COUNTY
BRAXTON COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
PRESTON COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
TUCKER COUNTY
TYLER COUNTY
UPSHUR COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
HARDY COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WAYNE COUNTY
WEBSTER COUNTY
BROOKE COUNTY
HANCOCK COUNTY
MCDOWELL COUNTY
BROOKE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
LOGAN COUNTY
HARRISON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/27/9 1(R)
06/15/79(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
08/01/87(R)
12/01/78(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
09/01/77(R)
01/01/91(R)
03/16/88(R)
09/10/84(R)
06/15/88(R)
05/17/90(R)
08/01/79(R)
08/24/84(R)
12/04/85(R)
04/16/91(R)
03/18/80(R)
03/16/88(R)
1 1/04/88(R)
04/01/88(R)
04/16/91(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
06/15/82(R)
06/03/9 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
09/05/79(R)
11/05/80(R)
08/24/84(R)
09/10/84(R)
04/16/91(R)
07/01/87(R)
08/25/87(R)
09/10/84(R)
01/18/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
11/04/88(R)
07/01/87(R)
09/28/79(R)
12/18/85(R)
09/28/84(R)
08/01/87(R)
09/18/87(R)
09/30/87(R)
02/16/90(R)
09/28/79(R)
09/01/83(R)
11/17/82(R)
09/04/87(R)
06/02/72(R)
04/01/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/27/91
01/20/93
03/18/91
08/01/87(L)
12/01/78
09/27/91
08/23/00
01/01/91(L)
09/20/95
09/10/84(M)
06/15/88(M)
05/17/90
08/01/79
08/24/84(M)
12/04/85(M)
04/16/91
03/18/80
02/05/92
1 1/04/88
04/01/88(L)
04/16/91
04/03/85
01/03/79
06/15/82
06/03/91
10/18/95
09/05/79
11/05/80
08/24/84(M)
03/18/91
09/06/96
07/01/87(L)
08/01/87(L)
06/02/92
01/18/84
06/02/92
11/04/88
07/01/87(L)
09/28/79(M)
12/18/85
09/28/84
08/01/87(L)
09/18/87
09/30/87
02/16/90
09/14/90
09/01/83
11/17/82
09/04/87
11/12/82
04/01/88(L)
Page 5 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
540025#
540087#
540274#
540207#
540152#
540045#
540229#
540138#
540216#
54027 1#
54021 1#
540213#
540106#
5402 17#
Community Name
WEST UNION, TOWN OF
WESTON, CITY OF
WESTOVER, CITY OF
WETZEL COUNTY *
WHEELING, CITY OF
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, CITY OF
WHITESVILLE, TOWN OF
WILLIAMSON, CITY OF
WILLIAMSTOWN, CITY OF
WINFIELD, TOWN OF
WIRT COUNTY*
WOOD COUNTY *
WORTHINGTON, TOWN OF
WYOMING COUNTY *
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
County
DODDRIDGE COUNTY
LEWIS COUNTY
MONONGALIA
COUNTY
WETZEL COUNTY
OHIO COUNTY
GREENBRIER
COUNTY
BOONE COUNTY
MINGO COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
WIRT COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
MARION COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
262
262
7
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
03/1 8/9 1(R)
04/15/82(R)
08/01/78(R)
04/04/83(R)
02/1 8/8 1(R)
08/01/78(R)
04/14/91(R)
01/16/81(R)
10/18/83(R)
12/18/85(R)
04/01/88(R)
03/04/85(R)
03/16/88(R)
03/15/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
03/18/91
08/18/92
12/19/95
04/04/83
02/19/92
04/15/92
09/06/96
01/02/92
10/18/83
12/18/85
04/01/88(L)
01/18/89
03/16/88
03/15/84
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 46
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 0
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 6 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program—
CID Community Name
**WEST VIRGINIA
540115# ANAWALT, TOWN OF
540027# ANSTED, TOWN OF
540219# OCEAN A, TOWN OF
540173A RHODELL, TOWN OF
540033# SMITHERS, TOWN OF
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR
County
MCDOWELL COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
WYOMING COUNTY
RALEIGH COUNTY
FAYETTE COUNTY
0
5
0
5
5
Hazard Area
Identified
02/01/85(F)
10/30/81(F)
10/16/79(F)
09/01/87(F)
04/15/82(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
02/01/85(8)
12/16/88(8)
10/16/79(8)
07/03/90(8)
06/17/91(8)
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(8) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 7 of 7
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550001#
550002
550158#
550213#
550612#
550185
555540#
550009#
550126#
550332#
550338#
555541A
555542#
550439#
550172
550224#
550004#
550005#
550600#
550246#
550127#
550173#
550145B
550380#
550218#
550392#
550568#
550010#
555543A
550539#
550017A
550270#
550526
550095#
550311
550068#
550159#
550225#
555544#
550166#
550477#
550574B
Communities Participating
Community Name
"WISCONSIN
ADAMS COUNTY *
ADAMS, CITY OF
ALBANY, VILLAGE OF
ALGOMA, CITY OF
ALLOUEZ, VILLAGE OF
USE THE BROWN COUNTY [550020] FIRM
ALMA CENTER, VILLAGE OF
ALMA, CITY OF
ALMENA, VILLAGE OF
ALTOONA, CITY OF
AMERY, CITY OF
AMHERST, VILLAGE OF
ANTIGO, CITY OF
APPLETON, CITY OF
ARCADIA, CITY OF
ARENA, VILLAGE OF
ARGYLE, VILLAGE OF
ASHLAND COUNTY *
ASHLAND, CITY OF
ASHWAUBENON, VILLAGE OF
ATHENS, VILLAGE OF
AUGUSTA, CITY OF
AVOCA, VILLAGE OF
BAGLEY, VILLAGE OF
BALDWIN, VILLAGE OF
BANGOR, VILLAGE OF
BARABOO, CITY OF
BARRON COUNTY *
BARRON, CITY OF
BAY CITY, VILLAGE OF
BAYFIELD COUNTY *
INCLUDES THE VILLAGE OF CABLE
BAYFIELD, CITY OF
BAYSIDE, VILLAGE OF
BEAR CREEK, CITY OF
BEAVER DAM, CITY OF
BELGIUM, VILLAGE OF
BELL CENTER, VILLAGE OF
BELLEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BELMONT, VILLAGE OF
BELOIT, CITY OF
BERLIN, CITY OF
BIG BEND, VILLAGE OF
BIRCHWOOD, VILLAGE OF
in the National Flood Program
County
ADAMS COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
KEWAUNEE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
LANGLADE COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
BAYFIELD COUNTY
BAYFIELD COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
WASHBURN COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
11/16/90(R)
09/01/88(R)
07/18/83(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/27/90(R)
01/03/85(R)
12/08/72(R)
07/15/88(R)
01/31/75
09/1 8/9 1(R)
01/17/91(R)
1 1/30/73(R)
04/06/73(R)
08/19/91(R)
03/18/85(R)
08/15/79(R)
02/15/78(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/28/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
05/04/89(R)
09/19/84(R)
06/17/86(R)
08/15/90(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/01/79(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/29/89(R)
06/11/71(R)
09/01/88(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/15/77(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/03/84(R)
06/30/99(R)
03/05/90(R)
11/19/80(R)
12/04/86(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
09/30/77(R)
03/01/84(R)
09/30/88(R)
Current Effective
Map
11/16/90
(NSFHA)
10/15/93
06/15/79
(NSFHA)
02/20/81
07/15/88
09/01/78
09/18/91
01/17/91
10/31/75
04/09/82
08/19/91
(NSFHA)
08/15/79
02/15/78
09/30/77
09/28/79
08/15/80
05/04/89
09/21/98
06/17/86(M)
08/15/90
01/02/81
03/07/01
08/02/96
09/29/89
10/17/75
11/04/92
09/18/85(M)
06/15/77
(NSFHA)
04/03/84
03/05/90
09/18/86
12/04/86
12/15/82
10/14/77
03/01/84
09/30/88(M)
Page 1 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550413B
555545#
550584#
550079#
550186#
550440#
550227#
550042#
550146C
550357#
550414A
550148#
550415B
550119#
550132C
550036#
550160#
550247
550478#
550020#
550271#
550096
550161#
550370A
555547A
555546A
550348#
550032#
550536#
550006A
550043#
550035#
550057C
550080#
550133#
550425#
550214#
555548#
550527
550416B
550312#
550451#
550012#
550037#
555549#
550044#
550048#
550237#
550494#
Community Name
BIRNAMWOOD, VILLAGE OF
BIRON, VILLAGE OF
BLACK CREEK, VILLAGE OF
BLACK EARTH, VILLAGE OF
BLACK RIVER FALLS, CITY OF
BLAIR, CITY OF
BLANCHARDVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BLOOMER, CITY OF
BLOOMINGTON, VILLAGE OF
BOAZ, VILLAGE OF
BONDUEL, VILLAGE OF
BOSCOBEL, CITY OF
BOWLER, VILLAGE OF
BOYCEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BRANDON, VILLAGE OF
BRILLION, CITY OF
BRODHEAD, CITY OF
BROKAW, VILLAGE OF
BROOKFIELD, CITY OF
BROWN COUNTY *
BROWN DEER, VILLAGE OF
BROWNSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
BROWNTOWN, VILLAGE OF
BRUCE, VILLAGE OF
BUFFALO COUNTY *
BUFFALO, CITY OF
BURLINGTON, CITY OF
BURNETT COUNTY *
BUTLER, VILLAGE OF
BUTTERNUT, VILLAGE OF
CADOTT, VILLAGE OF
CALUMET COUNTY *
CAMBRIA, VILLAGE OF
CAMBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
CAMPBELLSPORT, VILLAGE OF
CASCADE, VILLAGE OF
CASCO, VILLAGE OF
CASSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
CATAWBA, VILLAGE OF
CECIL, VILLAGE OF
CEDARBURG, CITY OF
CHASEBURG, VILLAGE OF
CHETEK, CITY OF
CHILTON, CITY OF
CHIPPEWA COUNTY *
CHIPPEWA FALLS, CITY OF
CLARK COUNTY *
CLEVELAND, VILLAGE OF
CLINTONVILLE, CITY OF
County
SHAWANO COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
BURNETT COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
KEWAUNEE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/19/85(R)
05/25/73(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
11/16/90(R)
08/15/79(R)
08/19/91(R)
08/19/86(R)
09/06/89(R)
09/18/85(R)
1 1/27/8 1(R)
09/04/85(R)
11/19/86(R)
09/16/88(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
09/29/89(R)
06/01/88(R)
08/19/86(R)
04/17/78(R)
03/28/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
10/16/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
01/05/73(R)
03/10/72(R)
05/15/78(R)
1 1/20/9 1(R)
05/15/78(R)
07/08/75
03/05/96(R)
05/03/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/04/80(R)
05/15/78(R)
10/15/81(R)
08/15/79(R)
02/19/72(R)
06/28/79(R)
08/19/85(R)
05/15/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
06/03/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/22/73(R)
09/01/77(R)
08/15/90(R)
05/15/78(R)
09/19/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/19/85(M)
12/17/93
03/02/81
01/02/81
02/04/81
11/16/90
08/15/79
08/19/91
08/19/86(M)
09/06/89
09/18/85(M)
10/06/98
09/04/85(M)
11/19/86
08/15/89
06/15/81
09/29/89
06/01/88(L)
08/19/86
1 1/04/92
03/28/80
(NSFHA)
10/16/84
09/01/86(L)
03/19/76
11/07/75
01/15/82
11/20/91
05/15/78
05/14/76
03/05/96
05/03/82
09/18/85(M)
06/04/80
05/15/78
10/15/81
08/15/79
08/04/88
(NSFHA)
08/19/85(M)
03/18/91
02/04/81
02/04/98
10/15/82
02/04/98
02/04/98
08/15/90
05/15/78
11/16/95
Page 2 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550176B
555550B
550049C
550260A
550120#
550581#
550058#
550304#
550452#
550045#
550617
550143#
555551#
550081#
550272#
550013A
550014#
550077#
550228#
550082#
550021#
550069#
550479#
550463#
550094#
550177B
550109#
550538#
550480#
550121#
550059B
550118#
550320#
550464#
555552#
550128#
550248B
550365#
550441#
550325#
550578#
550326#
550201#
550495B
550265#
550611#
550442#
550366#
550409A
Community Name
COBB, VILLAGE OF
COCHRANE, VILLAGE OF
COLBY, CITY OF
COLEMAN, VILLAGE OF
COLFAX, VILLAGE OF
COLUMBIA COUNTY *
COLUMBUS, CITY OF
COMBINED LOCKS, VILLAGE OF
COON VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
CORNELL, CITY OF
COTTAGE GROVE, VILLAGE OF
CRANDON, CITY OF
CRAWFORD COUNTY *
CROSS PLAINS, VILLAGE OF
CUDAHY, CITY OF
CUMBERLAND, CITY OF
DALLAS, VILLAGE OF
DANE COUNTY*
DARLINGTON, CITY OF
DE FOREST, VILLAGE OF
DE PERE, CITY OF
DE SOTO, VILLAGE OF
DELAFIELD, CITY OF
DELAVAN, CITY OF
DODGE COUNTY *
DODGEVILLE,CITY OF
DOOR COUNTY *
DOUGLAS COUNTY *
DOUSMAN, VILLAGE OF
DOWNING, VILLAGE OF
DOYLESTOWN, VILLAGE OF
DUNN COUNTY *
DURAND, CITY OF
EAST TROY, VILLAGE OF
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY *
EAU CLAIRE, CITY OF
EDGAR, VILLAGE OF
EDGERTON, CITY OF
ELEVA, VILLAGE OF
ELLSWORTH, VILLAGE OF
ELM GROVE, VILLAGE OF
ELMWOOD, VILLAGE OF
ELROY, CITY OF
EMBARRASS, VILLAGE OF
ENDEAVOR, VILLAGE OF
EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF
ETTRICK, VILLAGE OF
EVANSVILLE, CITY OF
EXELAND, VILLAGE OF
County
IOWA COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
MARINETTE COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
DOOR COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
PEPIN COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
DOOR COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
SAWYER COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
01/05/79(R)
02/25/72(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
04/15/80(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
09/28/90(R)
07/11/00
01/02/87(R)
04/20/73(R)
02/16/83(R)
12/15/78(R)
09/01/86(R)
12/04/85(R)
09/29/78(R)
09/15/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
01/16/81(R)
08/15/83(R)
09/01/83(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
07/02/87(R)
04/03/78(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
04/17/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
09/18/85(R)
10/15/81(R)
06/01/77(R)
12/01/82(R)
01/12/73(R)
06/01/77(R)
09/30/88(R)
04/15/82(R)
12/05/89(R)
05/04/89(R)
07/19/82(R)
03/05/90(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
06/17/86(R)
01/03/90(R)
01/15/98(R)
06/15/82(R)
01/18/84(R)
09/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
01/05/79(M)
05/23/75
09/18/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
08/16/88
09/15/83
12/01/81
06/15/81
02/04/81
09/28/90
01/02/87
05/18/00
02/16/83
12/15/78(M)
09/01/86(L)
12/04/85
03/05/96
09/15/78
08/05/85
07/02/81
01/16/81
08/15/83
09/01/83
06/15/81
07/02/87(M)
04/03/78
02/04/81
04/17/87
09/04/86
09/18/85(M)
08/16/96
06/01/77
12/01/82
08/16/93
02/04/98
09/30/88(M)
04/15/82
12/05/89
05/04/89
07/19/82
03/05/90
09/18/91
06/17/86(M)
01/03/90
12/05/95
06/15/82
05/04/92
09/01/86(L)
Page 3 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550135D
550130B
550060B
555553A
550521#
550131#
550136#
550575B
550603#
555554#
555555B
550097#
550274#
550273#
550334A
550313#
550496#
550003#
550443#
550071#
555556A
550472#
550295#
550433#
550275#
550381#
550314#
555557#
550033#
550229#
550022#
550157#
550165#
550167A
550276#
550277#
550051#
550418B
550524#
550382B
550473#
550481#
550251B
Community Name
FAIRWATER, VILLAGE OF
FALL CREEK, VILLAGE OF
FALL RIVER, VILLAGE OF
FERRYVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FLORENCE COUNTY *
FOND DU LAC COUNTY *
FOND DU LAC, CITY OF
FOOTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FOREST COUNTY *
FORT ATKINSON, CITY OF
FOUNTAIN CITY, CITY OF
FOX LAKE, CITY OF
FOX POINT, VILLAGE OF
FRANKLIN, CITY OF
FREDERIC, VILLAGE OF
FREDONIA, VILLAGE OF
FREEMONT, VILLAGE OF
FRIENDSHIP, VILLAGE OF
GALESVILLE, CITY OF
GAYS MILLS, VILLAGE OF
GENOA, VILLAGE OF
GERMANTOWN, VILLAGE OF
GILLETT, CITY OF
OILMAN, VILLAGE OF
GLENDALE, CITY OF
GLENWOOD, CITY OF
GRAFTON, VILLAGE OF
GRANT COUNTY *
GRANTSBURG, VILLAGE OF
GRATIOT, VILLAGE OF
GREEN BAY, CITY OF
GREEN COUNTY *
GREEN LAKE COUNTY *
GREEN LAKE, CITY OF
GREENDALE, VILLAGE OF
GREENFIELD, CITY OF
GREENWOOD, CITY OF
GRESHAM, VILLAGE OF
HALES CORNERS, VILLAGE OF
HAMMOND, VILLAGE OF
HARTFORD, CITY OF
HARTLAND, VILLAGE OF
HATLEY, VILLAGE OF
County
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
FLORENCE COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
FOREST COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
BURNETT COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
09/04/85(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
05/26/72(R)
05/01/78(R)
07/19/82(R)
01/03/79(R)
07/03/86(R)
06/11/01(R)
08/06/71(R)
04/20/72(R)
03/16/81(R)
05/16/77(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/01/86(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
06/15/77(R)
11/16/90(R)
03/16/81(R)
06/15/78(R)
02/26/72(R)
05/03/82(R)
02/01/84(R)
01/05/89(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/04/86(R)
05/15/80(R)
05/25/73(R)
02/02/89(R)
12/04/86(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/15/83(R)
03/01/78(R)
09/27/85(R)
08/02/82(R)
06/01/78(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/18/85(R)
06/15/79(R)
07/16/87(R)
12/04/84(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/27/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
09/04/85(M)
09/01/86(L)
09/04/85(M)
10/31/75
05/01/78
06/06/00
1 1/04/88
07/03/86(M)
05/08/81
06/01/84
08/05/77
03/16/81
05/16/77
01/06/82
09/01/86(L)
03/18/91
01/02/87
11/16/90
03/16/81
03/05/90
10/10/75
05/03/82
02/01/84
01/05/89
06/19/81
09/04/86
03/18/91
12/20/99
02/02/89
12/04/86
06/01/84
09/18/86
02/02/90
09/27/85(M)
08/02/82
06/01/78
09/04/85(M)
09/18/85(M)
06/15/88
07/16/87(M)
12/04/84
12/01/82
09/27/85(M)
Page 4 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550373#
550410#
550038
550455A
550187#
550178A
550219#
550098#
550529#
550023#
550608
555558A
555559A
550557#
550444#
550374A
550497B
550522#
550182#
550583#
550530#
555560#
550191#
555561#
550194#
550580#
550305#
550101A
550287#
550531
550523#
550209#
550474#
550212#
550215#
550239#
550306#
550168A
550426#
550217#
555562#
550456#
550565#
550375#
550223#
550466#
550195#
550112#
Community Name
HAWKINS, VILLAGE OF
HAYWARD, CITY OF
HILBERT, VILLAGE OF
HILLSBORO,CITY OF
HIXTON, VILLAGE OF
HOLLANDALE, VILLAGE OF
HOLMEN, VILLAGE OF
HORICON, CITY OF
HORTONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
HOWARD, VILLAGE OF
HOWARDS GROVE, VILLAGE OF
HUDSON, CITY OF
HURLEY, CITY OF
HUSTISFORD, VILLAGE OF
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF
INGRAM, VILLAGE OF
IOLA, VILLAGE OF
IOWA COUNTY *
IRON COUNTY*
JACKSON COUNTY *
JACKSON, VILLAGE OF
JANESVILLE, CITY OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY *
JEFFERSON, CITY OF
JOHNSON CREEK, VILLAGE OF
JUNEAU COUNTY *
KAUKAUNA, CITY OF
KEKOSKEE, VILLAGE OF
KENDALL, VILLAGE OF
KENNAN, VILLAGE OF
KENOSHA COUNTY *
KENOSHA, CITY OF
KEWASKUM, VILLAGE OF
KEWAUNEE COUNTY *
KEWAUNEE, CITY OF
KIEL, CITY OF
KIMBERLY, VILLAGE OF
KINGSTON, VILLAGE OF
KOHLER, VILLAGE OF
LA CROSSE COUNTY *
LA CROSSE, CITY OF
LA FAROE, VILLAGE OF
LAC LA BELLE, VILLAGE OF
LADYSMITH, CITY OF
LAFAYETTE COUNTY*
LAKE GENEVA, CITY OF
LAKE MILLS,CITY OF
LAKE NEBAGAMON, VILLAGE OF
County
RUSK COUNTY
SAWYER COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
KENOSHA COUNTY
KENOSHA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
KEWAUNEE COUNTY
KEWAUNEE COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
GREEN ALKE
COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/15/88(R)
11/01/79(R)
04/15/85(R)
06/01/87(R)
01/02/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/20/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
02/17/82(R)
11/14/83
11/10/72(R)
04/06/73(R)
08/15/80(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
07/11/79
09/04/85(R)
01/17/79(R)
04/01/88(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/17/81(R)
03/31/72(R)
09/29/78(R)
05/26/72(R)
09/30/82(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
07/16/81(R)
09/01/86(R)
09/18/86(R)
06/28/79(R)
02/17/82(R)
09/02/82(R)
01/06/82(R)
09/03/80(R)
02/15/80(R)
01/03/85(R)
05/17/82(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
03/15/84(R)
01/15/71(R)
11/16/90(R)
01/18/84(R)
09/01/78(R)
09/15/78(R)
12/01/82(R)
07/02/87(R)
08/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/15/88
11/01/79
(NSFHA)
06/01/87(L)
01/02/87
09/01/86(L)
04/20/79(M)
08/15/80
07/02/81
02/17/82
10/03/75
11/14/75
08/15/80
09/27/91
06/04/76
09/04/85(M)
09/21/98
04/01/88(L)
01/19/94
08/17/81
07/17/85
10/16/84
08/01/84
06/01/84
09/18/91
07/16/81
09/01/86(L)
09/18/86
(NSFHA)
12/05/96
12/05/96
01/06/82
09/03/80
02/15/80
07/03/85
05/17/82
09/01/86(L)
04/02/91
03/15/84
05/15/85
11/16/90
01/18/84
09/01/78
12/04/86
12/01/82
07/02/87(M)
08/15/78
Page 5 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550150B
550576#
550482#
550296B
550585#
550179B
550307#
550151
550061#
550359B
550052B
550335B
550216B
555563A
550083#
550498#
550236#
550240B
550252#
550245#
550259#
550261#
550499#
550169A
550601#
550084#
550515#
550204#
550103#
550085#
550086#
550435#
550007#
550188#
550288#
550510#
550619
550483#
550123#
555564#
555565#
550189A
550087#
550278#
550180B
550468A
Community Name
LANCASTER, CITY OF
LANGLADE COUNTY *
LANNON, VILLAGE OF
LENA, VILLAGE OF
LINCOLN COUNTY*
LINDEN, VILLAGE OF
LITTLE CHUTE, VILLAGE OF
LIVINGSTON, VILLAGE OF
LODI, CITY OF
LONE ROCK, VILLAGE OF
LOYAL, CITY OF
LUCK, VILLAGE OF
LUXEMBURG, VILLAGE OF
LYNXVILLE, VILLAGE OF
MADISON, CITY OF
MANAWA, CITY OF
MANITOWOC COUNTY *
MANITOWOC, CITY OF
MARATHON CITY, VILLAGE OF
MARATHON COUNTY *
MARINETTE COUNTY *
MARINETTE, CITY OF
MARION, CITY OF
MARKESAN, CITY OF
MARQUETTE COUNTY*
MARSHALL, VILLAGE OF
MARSHFIELD, CITY OF
MAUSTON, CITY OF
MAYVILLE, CITY OF
MAZOMANIE, VILLAGE OF
MC FARLAND, VILLAGE OF
MEDFORD, CITY OF
MELLEN, CITY OF
MELROSE, VILLAGE OF
MELVINA, VILLAGE OF
MENASHA, CITY OF
MENOMINEE INDIAN RESERVATION, TRIBE OF
MENOMONEE FALLS, VILLAGE OF
MENOMONIE, CITY OF
MEQUON, CITY OF
MERRILL, CITY OF
MERRILLAN, VILLAGE OF
MIDDLETON, CITY OF
MILWAUKEE, CITY OF
MINERAL POINT, CITY OF
MINONG, VILLAGE OF
County
GRANT COUNTY
LANGLADE COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
KEWAUNEE COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
MARINETTE COUNTY
MARINETTE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
ASHLAND COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
MENOMINEE
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
08/05/86(R)
09/28/90(R)
12/01/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
02/19/86(R)
01/05/79(R)
06/1 5/8 1(R)
05/25/78(R)
11/15/84(R)
09/29/86(R)
09/04/85(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/04/86(R)
03/16/73(R)
09/30/80(R)
05/04/88(R)
09/15/78(R)
04/15/77(R)
08/15/80(R)
02/01/79(R)
03/1 8/9 1(R)
03/15/78(R)
05/04/88(R)
06/09/75
01/27/92(R)
12/16/80(R)
02/18/75
09/1 8/9 1(R)
06/01/81(R)
12/01/81(R)
06/15/78(R)
09/01/78(R)
11/19/86(R)
03/16/81(R)
03/02/8 1(R)
04/03/78(R)
04/22/99
09/15/78(R)
01/03/90(R)
1 1/03/72(R)
07/20/73(R)
09/01/86(R)
05/01/80(R)
03/01/82(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
08/05/86
09/28/90
12/01/82
09/18/85(M)
02/19/86
01/05/79(M)
06/15/81
(NSFHA)
11/15/84
09/29/86(M)
09/04/85(M)
07/02/87(M)
09/04/86(M)
11/28/75
03/05/96
05/04/88
09/21/98
04/15/77
08/15/80
08/03/81
11/04/92
03/15/78
05/04/88
10/10/75
09/27/91
12/16/80
1 1/26/76
09/18/91
06/01/81
04/02/91
06/15/78
09/28/78
11/19/86
03/16/81
03/02/81
01/05/84
10/09/81
01/03/90
03/18/91
07/20/98
09/01/86(L)
03/05/96
11/19/87
07/16/87(M)
09/01/86(L)
Page 6 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
555566#
550031#
550088#
550571#
550162#
550266#
550163#
550184#
555567A
550137
550485#
550153#
550486#
550205#
550509#
550053#
550516#
550339A
550104#
550267
550487#
550164#
550039#
550206#
550308#
550384#
550262#
550138#
550399#
555568#
550289A
550279#
550139B
550582#
550488#
550294#
550298#
550297#
550113A
550533#
550221#
550579#
550457A
550427A
550089#
550336#
Community Name
MISHICOT, VILLAGE OF
MONDOVI, CITY OF
MONONA, CITY OF
MONROE COUNTY *
MONROE, CITY OF
MONTELLO, CITY OF
MONTICELLO, VILLAGE OF
MONTREAL, CITY OF
MOSINEE, CITY OF
MOUNT CALVARY, VILLAGE OF
MUKWONAGO, VILLAGE OF
MUSCODA, VILLAGE OF
MUSKEGO, CITY OF
NECEDAH, VILLAGE OF
NEENAH, CITY OF
NEILLSVILLE, CITY OF
NEKOOSA, CITY OF
NELSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
NEOSO, VILLAGE OF
NESHKORO, VILLAGE OF
NEW BERLIN, CITY OF
NEW GLARUS, VILLAGE OF
NEW HOLSTEIN, CITY OF
NEW LISBON, CITY OF
NEW LONDON, CITY OF
NEW RICHMOND, CITY OF
NIAGARA, VILLAGE OF
NORTH FOND DU LAC, VILLAGE OF
NORTH FREEDOM, VILLAGE OF
NORTH HUDSON, VILLAGE OF
NORWALK, VILLAGE OF
OAK CREEK, CITY OF
OAKFIELD, VILLAGE OF
OCONOMOWAC LAKE, VILLAGE OF
OCONOMOWOC, CITY OF
OCONTO COUNTY *
OCONTO FALLS, CITY OF
OCONTO, CITY OF
OLIVER, VILLAGE OF
OMRO, CITY OF
ONALASKA, CITY OF
ONEIDA COUNTY *
ONTARIO, VILLAGE OF
OOSTBURG, VILLAGE OF
OREGON, VILLAGE OF
OSCEOLA, VILLAGE OF
County
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
BUFFALO COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
IRON COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
GREEN COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
MARINETTE COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/13/72(R)
06/01/81(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/03/82(R)
12/01/82(R)
11/16/90(R)
07/18/83(R)
11/04/88(R)
12/16/73(R)
09/30/76(R)
07/05/82(R)
10/25/74
12/01/82(R)
01/27/92(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
07/17/78(R)
07/16/87(R)
09/01/86(R)
06/15/88(R)
09/01/88(R)
03/18/87(R)
08/01/83(R)
07/02/8 1(R)
09/1 8/9 1(R)
03/15/77(R)
06/05/74
04/03/78(R)
12/04/79(R)
09/19/84(R)
01/12/73(R)
09/25/75
09/29/78(R)
09/30/88(R)
10/16/84(R)
09/01/83(R)
01/06/83(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/17/84
08/01/80(R)
09/16/81(R)
08/05/91(R)
08/16/78
08/31/98(R)
09/30/80(R)
01/05/84(R)
Current Effective
Map
05/15/81
06/01/81
06/15/78
05/03/82
12/01/82
11/16/90
07/18/83
11/04/88
11/14/75
(NSFHA)
07/05/82
09/08/99
12/01/82
09/18/91
01/02/81
07/17/78
12/17/93
09/01/86(L)
06/15/88
09/01/88
11/06/96
08/01/83
07/02/81
09/18/91
03/15/77
02/05/82
04/03/78
12/04/79
03/07/01
10/09/81
04/09/76
09/29/78
09/30/88(M)
10/16/84
09/01/83
08/03/98
07/16/81
08/03/81
06/18/76
08/01/80
09/16/81
08/05/91
05/28/76
06/04/76
09/30/80
01/05/84
Page 7 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550511#
550445#
550302#
550054B
550268#
550310#
550196#
550062#
550344#
555570C
555569B
550263#
550489#
550345B
555571#
550446B
550517#
550400#
550154#
550613#
550340#
550328#
550428#
550577#
550114A
555572#
550316#
550572#
550063#
550609#
550064#
555573A
550401#
550015B
550346B
555574A
550343#
550171#
550024#
550347#
555575A
550411 A
550429#
550458#
550402#
550242B
550105B
550301#
550436B
Community Name
OSHKOSH, CITY OF
OSSEO, CITY OF
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY *
OWEN, CITY OF
OXFORD, VILLAGE OF
OZAUKEE COUNTY *
PALMYRA, VILLAGE OF
PARDEEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
PARK FALLS, CITY OF
PEPIN COUNTY *
PEPIN, VILLAGE OF
PESHTIGO, CITY OF
PEWAUKEE, VILLAGE OF
PHILLIPS, CITY OF
PIERCE COUNTY *
PIGEON FALLS, VILLAGE OF
PITTSVILLE, CITY OF
PLAIN, VILLAGE OF
PLATTEVILLE, CITY OF
PLEASANT PRAIRIE, VILLAGE OF
PLOVER, VILLAGE OF
PLUM CITY, VILLAGE OF
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
POLK COUNTY *
POPLAR, VILLAGE OF
PORT EDWARDS, VILLAGE OF
PORT WASHINGTON, CITY OF
PORTAGE COUNTY *
PORTAGE, CITY OF
POTTER, VILLAGE OF
POYNETTE, VILLAGE OF
PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, CITY OF
PRAIRIE DU SAC, VILLAGE OF
PRAIRIE FARM, VILLAGE OF
PRENTICE, VILLAGE OF
PRESCOTT, CITY OF
PRICE COUNTY *
PRINCETON, CITY OF
PULASKI, VILLAGE OF
RACINE COUNTY *
RACINE, CITY OF
RADISON, VILLAGE OF
RANDOM LAKE, VILLAGE OF
READSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
REEDSBURG, CITY OF
REEDSVILLE, VILLAGE OF
REESEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
RHINELANDER, TOWN OF
RIB LAKE, VILLAGE OF
County
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
PEPIN COUNTY
PEPIN COUNTY
MARINETTE COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
KENOSHA COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
PRICE COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
SAWYER COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
ONEIDA COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
05/16/77(R)
09/05/90(R)
09/30/77(R)
1 1/20/74
08/16/88(R)
05/16/77(R)
05/03/90(R)
08/15/83(R)
12/15/89(R)
12/16/72(R)
05/26/72(R)
03/09/9 1(R)
06/15/82(R)
09/18/85(R)
07/14/72(R)
09/16/88(R)
1 1/06/9 1(R)
09/30/88(R)
06/24/75
04/03/98(R)
03/01/84(R)
01/03/90(R)
07/05/83(R)
06/04/90(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/13/73(R)
10/15/81(R)
06/01/83(R)
08/15/83(R)
07/30/96(R)
09/18/85(R)
05/22/70(R)
09/29/00
05/15/86(R)
09/27/85(R)
07/09/7 1(R)
12/05/89(R)
06/15/88(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/01/82(R)
06/01/73(R)
09/01/86(R)
04/01/81(R)
03/16/76(R)
03/04/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
08/19/85(R)
08/05/91(R)
09/18/85(R)
Current Effective
Map
06/02/95
09/05/90
09/30/93
04/13/79
08/16/88
12/06/99
05/03/90
08/15/83
12/15/89
01/02/76
05/02/75
03/04/91
04/17/87
09/18/85(M)
09/02/94
09/16/88(M)
12/17/93
03/07/01
09/29/96
12/05/96
03/01/84
01/03/90
07/05/83
06/04/90
09/01/86(L)
12/17/93
12/06/99
06/01/83
08/15/83
06/15/83
09/18/85(M)
1 1/28/75
03/07/01
05/15/86(M)
09/27/85(M)
02/27/76
12/05/89
06/15/88
08/03/81
04/01/82
01/02/76
09/01/86(L)
04/01/81
11/16/90
03/07/01
09/30/88(M)
08/19/85(M)
08/05/91
09/18/85(M)
Page 8 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550016#
555576#
550356#
550181B
550140#
550330#
550280#
550352#
550363#
550403#
550141#
550341
555577C
550602#
550404#
550391#
550317#
550591#
555579#
550534#
550412#
550421#
550424#
55043 1#
550430#
550376B
550469#
550309#
550282B
550230B
550210#
550587#
550074#
550115#
550386A
550283#
550231#
550290#
550470#
550405#
550331#
550142A
555578B
550337A
Community Name
RICE LAKE, CITY OF
RICHLAND CENTER, CITY OF
RICHLAND COUNTY*
RIDGEWAY, VILLAGE OF
RIPON, CITY OF
RIVER FALLS, CITY OF
RIVER HILLS, VILLAGE OF
ROCHESTER, VILLAGE OF
ROCK COUNTY *
ROCK SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
ROSENDALE, VILLAGE OF
ROSHOLT, VILLAGE OF
ROTHSCHILD, VILLAGE OF
RUSK COUNTY*
SAUK CITY, VILLAGE OF
SAUK COUNTY *
SAUKVILLE, VILLAGE OF
SAWYER COUNTY *
SCHOFIELD, CITY OF
SEYMOUR, CITY OF
SHAWANO COUNTY *
SHAWANO, CITY OF
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY *
SHEBOYGAN FALLS, CITY OF
SHEBOYGAN, CITY OF
SHELDON, VILLAGE OF
SHELL LAKE, CITY OF
SHIOCTON, VILLAGE OF
SHOREWOOD, VILLAGE OF
SHULLSBURG, CITY OF
SILVER LAKE, VILLAGE OF
SLINGER, VILLAGE OF
SOLDIERS GROVE, VILLAGE OF
SOLON SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
SOMERSET, VILLAGE OF
SOUTH MILWAUKEE, CITY OF
SOUTH WAYNE, VILLAGE OF
SPARTA, CITY OF
SPOONER, CITY OF
SPRING GREEN, VILLAGE OF
SPRING VALLEY, VILLAGE OF
ST. CLOUD, VILLAGE OF
ST. CROIX COUNTY *
ST. CROIX FALLS, CITY OF
County
BARRON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
IOWA COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
ROCK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
SAWYER COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
WASHBURN COUNTY
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
KENOSHA COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
LAFAYETTE COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
WASHBURN COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
POLK COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
04/01/82(R)
06/01/73(R)
09/27/9 1(R)
01/05/79(R)
08/15/80(R)
12/15/82(R)
04/15/80(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
08/01/83(R)
09/18/85(R)
09/29/89(R)
09/01/88(R)
05/11/73(R)
05/31/88(R)
05/07/75
09/17/80(R)
12/16/80(R)
09/14/90(R)
07/13/73(R)
1 1/09/79(R)
10/14/77(R)
12/05/89(R)
07/17/78(R)
04/02/9 1(R)
03/15/77(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/16/88(R)
07/16/81(R)
08/11/78(R)
07/17/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
10/16/86
04/03/84(R)
08/15/78(R)
06/01/87(R)
04/15/80(R)
01/29/87(R)
08/03/81(R)
04/02/79(R)
02/01/86(R)
03/15/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
04/27/73(R)
05/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
04/01/82
08/01/83
09/27/91
01/05/79(M)
08/15/80
12/15/82
04/15/80
01/02/81
08/01/83
03/07/01
09/29/89
09/01/88
03/31/78
01/02/87
03/07/01
03/07/01
12/06/99
09/14/90
02/08/80
1 1/09/79(M)
11/15/85
12/05/89
09/03/92
04/02/91
04/02/91
09/27/85(M)
09/08/00
07/16/81
08/11/78(M)
07/17/86
09/01/78
10/21/77
03/05/90
08/15/78
06/01/87(L)
04/15/80
12/04/86
07/17/86
01/01/82
03/07/01
03/15/84
07/01/87(L)
03/26/76
05/01/87(L)
Page 9 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550281
550047B
550437#
555580A
550342#
550040#
555581B
555582C
550091#
550256A
555583#
550111#
550197B
550573#
550116#
550300#
550490#
550190A
550106#
550318#
550055#
550422B
550291#
550235#
550377B
555585A
555584C
550211#
550243#
550586#
550450#
550092#
550460#
550492#
550462#
550606#
550019#
550471#
550354#
550198B
550107#
550476#
550491#
550093#
550502#
550108#
550258A
Community Name
ST. FRANCIS, CITY OF
STANLEY, CITY OF
STETSONVILLE, VILLAGE OF
STEUBEN, VILLAGE OF
STEVENS POINT, CITY OF
STOCKBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF
STOCKHOLM, VILLAGE OF
STODDARD, VILLAGE OF
STOUGHTON, CITY OF
STRATFORD, VILLAGE OF
STRUM, VILLAGE OF
STURGEON BAY, CITY OF
SULLIVAN, VILLAGE OF
SUN PRAIRIE, CITY OF
SUPERIOR, CITY OF
SURING, VILLAGE OF
SUSSEX, VILLAGE OF
TALYOR,VILLAGE OF
THERESA, VILLAGE OF
THIENSVILLE, CITY OF
THORP, CITY OF
TIGERTON, VILLAGE OF
TOMAH, CITY OF
TOMAHAWK, CITY OF
TONY, VILLAGE OF
TREMPEALEAU COUNTY *
TREMPEALEAU, VILLAGE OF
TWIN LAKES, VILLAGE OF
TWO RIVERS, CITY OF
UNION GROVE, VILLAGE OF
VERNON COUNTY *
VERONA, CITY OF
VIOLA, VILLAGE OF
WALPACA COUNTY*
WALWORTH COUNTY *
WASHBURN COUNTY*
WASHBURN, CITY OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY *
WATERFORD, VILLAGE OF
WATERLOO, CITY OF
WATERTOWN, CITY OF
WAUKESHA COUNTY*
WAUKESHA, CITY OF
WAUNAKEE, VILLAGE OF
WAUPACA, CITY OF
WAUPUN, CITY OF
WAUSAU, CITY OF
County
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
CALUMET COUNTY
PEPIN COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
DOOR COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
OCONTO COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
OZAUKEE COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
KENOSHA COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
VERNON COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
WASHBURN COUNTY
BAYFIELD COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
FOND DU LAC
COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/07/78(R)
09/18/85(R)
08/10/79(R)
04/20/73(R)
06/01/83(R)
05/03/82(R)
12/08/72(R)
10/20/72(R)
06/15/78(R)
05/01/87(R)
05/13/72(R)
08/05/91(R)
09/18/85(R)
12/11/95(R)
04/03/78(R)
12/01/83(R)
06/19/89(R)
06/01/87(R)
07/16/80(R)
08/01/78(R)
08/15/84(R)
07/17/86(R)
08/17/81(R)
09/04/85(R)
09/16/88(R)
12/22/72(R)
12/12/72(R)
06/01/82(R)
04/03/78(R)
06/17/86(R)
09/29/78(R)
08/01/80(R)
06/04/90(R)
08/15/77(R)
08/15/83(R)
06/30/99(R)
1 1/02/95(R)
09/01/83(R)
0 1/02/8 1(R)
09/18/85(R)
04/01/81(R)
08/01/83(R)
09/02/82(R)
05/01/78(R)
08/03/89(R)
08/15/84(R)
01/05/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
09/18/85(M)
08/10/79(M)
03/05/76
06/01/83
05/03/82
03/28/75
01/01/82
06/15/78
05/01/87(L)
10/17/80
08/05/91
09/18/85(M)
01/17/91
02/23/79
12/01/83
06/19/89
06/01/87(L)
07/16/80
03/18/91
08/15/84
07/17/86
08/17/81
09/04/85
09/16/88(M)
03/26/76
1 1/07/75
06/01/82
04/03/78
06/17/86(M)
11/16/90
08/01/80
06/04/90
01/02/87
08/15/83
06/08/98
1 1/02/95
09/10/83
01/02/81
09/18/85(M)
04/01/81
12/18/86
09/02/82
1 1/02/83
08/03/89
04/02/91
01/05/78
Page 10 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550264A
550540#
550506A
550284#
555586A
550285#
550407#
550475#
550561
550560#
550269#
550503A
550124#
550286A
550449#
550200#
550607#
550423B
550507B
550389A
550292#
550355#
550537#
550512#
550065#
555587#
550208#
550513#
550390#
550025#
550293#
550066#
550362A
Community Name
WAUSAUKEE, VILLAGE OF
WAUSHARA COUNTY*
WAUTOMA, CITY OF
WAUWATOSA, CITY OF
WAUZEKA, VILLAGE OF
WEST ALLIS, CITY OF
WEST BARABOO, VILLAGE OF
WEST BEND, CITY OF
WEST MILWAUKEE, VILLAGE OF
WEST SALEM, VILLAGE OF
WESTFIELD, VILLAGE OF
WEYAUWEGA, CITY OF
WHEELER, VILLAGE OF
WHITEFISH BAY, VILLAGE OF
WHITEHALL, CITY OF
WHITEWATER, CITY OF
WHITING, VILLAGE OF
WHITTENBERG, VILLAGE OF
WILD ROSE, VILLAGE OF
WILSON, VILLAGE OF
WILTON, VILLAGE OF
WIND POINT, VILLAGE OF
WINNEBAGO COUNTY *
WINNECONNE, VILLAGE OF
WISCONSIN DELLS, CITY OF
WISCONSIN RAPIDS, CITY OF
WONEWOC, VILLAGE OF
WOOD COUNTY *
WOODVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WRIGHTSTOWN, VILLAGE OF
WYEVILLE, VILLAGE OF
WYOCENA, VILLAGE OF
YUBA, VILLAGE OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
County
MARINETTE COUNTY
WAUSHARA COUNTY
WAUSHARA COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
CRAWFORD COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
LA CROSSE COUNTY
MARQUETTE
COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
MILWAUKEE
COUNTY
TREMPEALEAU
COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
PORTAGE COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
WAUSHARA COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
WINNEBAGO
COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
BROWN COUNTY
MONROE COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
496
477
12
82
19
16
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/01/87(R)
1 1/02/9 1(R)
08/20/75
12/01/78(R)
04/20/73(R)
04/1 5/8 1(R)
09/19/84(R)
08/02/82(R)
09/28/78(R)
04/17/86(R)
01/17/91(R)
07/01/87(R)
03/15/84(R)
05/01/87(R)
11/16/90(R)
06/01/82(R)
02/15/84(R)
09/27/85(R)
09/30/88(R)
05/01/87(R)
10/15/85(R)
09/30/80(R)
02/04/8 1(R)
08/01/80(R)
12/18/84(R)
09/14/73(R)
09/30/88(R)
03/15/78(R)
05/04/89(R)
05/19/81(R)
03/01/84(R)
01/18/84(R)
07/01/87(R)
Current Effective
Map
07/01/87(L)
11/06/91
03/14/75
12/01/78
03/05/76
04/15/81
03/07/01
07/16/97
(NSFHA)
12/15/82
08/03/98
07/01/87(L)
03/15/84
05/01/87(L)
11/16/90
06/01/82
01/18/84
09/27/85(M)
09/30/88(M)
05/01/87(L)
10/15/85
09/30/80
07/23/82
08/16/94
03/07/01
12/17/93
09/18/91
12/17/93
05/04/89
05/19/81
03/01/84
01/18/85
07/01/87(L)
Page 11 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 12 of 14 06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program-
cm
550333
550493A
550147#
550011A
550358A
550371A
550408B
550461A
550417A
550249A
550250A
550610#
550592#
550110A
550238A
550465B
550372
550050A
550614#
550202#
550100
550393#
550122#
550394#
550395#
550396#
550397#
550102A
550327#
550170A
550598A
550419A
550398#
550484#
550152A
550046A
550350A
550500A
550155A
550508A
550090#
550388
550387A
550353#
550117
550599#
550207#
Community Name
** WISCONSIN
BALSAM LAKE, VILLAGE OF
BIG FALLS, VILLAGE OF
BLUE RIVER, VILLAGE OF
CAMERON, VILLAGE OF
CAZENOVIA, VILLAGE OF
CONRATH, VILLAGE OF
COUDERAY, VILLAGE OF
EAGLE RIVER, CITY OF
ELAND, VILLAGE OF
ELDERON, VILLAGE OF
FENWOOD, VILLAGE OF
FITCHBURG, CITY OF
FONTANA ON GENEVA LAKE, VILLAGE OF
FORESTVILLE, VILLAGE OF
FRANCIS CREEK, VILLAGE OF
GENOA CITY, VILLAGE OF
GLEN FLORA, VILLAGE OF
GRANTON, VILLAGE OF
HAUGEN, VILLAGE OF
HUSTLER, VILLAGE OF
IRON RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
IRONTON, VILLAGE OF
KNAPP, VILLAGE OF
LAKE DELTON, VILLAGE OF
LAVALLE, VILLAGE OF
LIME RIDGE, VILLAGE OF
LOGANVILLE, VILLAGE OF
LOWELL, VILLAGE OF
MAIDEN ROCK, VILLAGE OF
MARQUETTE, CITY OF
MASON, VILLAGE OF
MATTOON, VILLAGE OF
MERRIMAC, VILLAGE OF
MERTON, VILLAGE OF
MOUNT HOPE, VILLAGE OF
NEW AUBURN, CITY OF
NORTH BAY, VILLAGE OF
OGDENSBURG, VILLAGE OF
POTOSI, VILLAGE OF
REDGRANITE, VILLAGE OF
ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF
STANTON, TOWN OF
STAR PRAIRIE, VILLAGE OF
STURTEVANT, VILLAGE OF
SUPERIOR, VILLAGE OF
TAYLOR COUNTY
UNION CENTER, VILLAGE OF
County
POLK COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
BARRON COUNTY
RICHLAND COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
SAWYER COUNTY
VILAS COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
MARATHON COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
DOOR COUNTY
MANITOWOC
COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
CLARK COUNTY
BARROW COOUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
DUNN COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
DODGE COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY
GREEN LAKE
COUNTY
BAYFIELD COUNTY
SHAWANO COUNTY
SAUK COUNTY
WAUKESHA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
CHIPPEWA COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
WAUPACA COUNTY
GRANT COUNTY
WAUSHARA COUNTY
DANE COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
ST. CROIX COUNTY
RACINE COUNTY
DOUGLAS COUNTY
TAYLOR COUNTY
JUNEAU COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
07/01/88(F)
08/30/74
08/09/99(F)
12/28/73
08/23/74
08/30/74
09/30/88(F)
12/28/73
08/23/74
07/19/74
08/02/74
09/18/86(F)
12/23/77(F)
11/30/73
05/17/74
09/04/85(F)
1 1/08/74
08/30/74
08/02/96(F)
09/1 8/9 1(F)
07/23/76
03/07/0 1(F)
05/04/89(F)
09/04/85(F)
09/19/84(F)
09/01/87(F)
02/15/85(F)
05/17/74
09/30/88(F)
12/18/73
08/26/77
08/30/74
03/07/0 1(F)
08/03/89(F)
08/30/74
07/19/74
09/06/74
08/23/74
12/28/73
05/17/74
12/16/80(F)
11/15/74
02/28/73
06/04/80(F)
09/01/88(F)
12/01/78
11/15/74(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
07/01/88(8)
08/30/75
01/28/78
12/28/74
08/23/75
08/30/75
09/30/88(8)
12/28/74
08/23/75
07/19/75
08/02/75
09/18/87
12/23/78
11/30/74
05/17/75
02/19/86(8)
1 1/08/75
08/30/75
08/02/97
08/23/75
07/23/77
08/16/75
05/04/89(8)
04/13/01(8)
04/13/01(8)
04/13/01(8)
04/13/01(8)
05/17/75
09/30/88(8)
12/18/74
08/26/78
08/30/75
04/13/01(8)
08/03/89(8)
08/30/75
07/19/75
09/06/75
08/23/75
12/28/74
05/17/75
12/16/80(8)
11/15/75
02/28/74
05/24/75
09/01/88(8)
12/01/79
11/15/75
Page 13 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
550257A
550519#
550605#
550432A
550378
550233
550594#
Community Name
UNITY, CITY OF
VESPER, VILLAGE OF
VILAS COUNTY *
WALDO, VILLAGE OF
WEYERHAUSER, VILLAGE OF
WHITE LAKE, VILLAGE OF
WILLIAMS BAY, VILLAGE OF
County
MARATHON COUNTY
WOOD COUNTY
VILAS COUNTY
SHEBOYGAN
COUNTY
RUSK COUNTY
LANGLADE COUNTY
WALWORTH COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
09/20/74
02/17/93(F)
04/17/81
05/01/87(F)
11/12/76
10/01/76
05/15/84(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/20/75
08/02/75
04/17/82
07/16/87(8)
11/12/77
10/01/77
10/21/78
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 1
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 13
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 52
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 52
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 14 of 14
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities
CID Community Name
** WYOMING
560068# AFTON, TOWN OF
56000 1 # ALBANY COUNTY*
560009# BAGGS, TOWN OF
560069 BASIN, TOWN OF
560004# BIG HORN COUNTY
560070 BIG PINEY, TOWN OF
560027# BUFFALO, CITY OF
56008 1 # CAMPBELL COUNTY *
560008# CARBON COUNTY*
560037# CASPER, CITY OF
560030# CHEYENNE, CITY OF
56004 IB CHUGWATER, TOWN OF
560038 CODY, CITY OF
560033# COKEVILLE,TOWN OF
560082# CONVERSE COUNTY*
560045A DAYTON, TOWN OF
560034# DIAMONDVILLE, TOWN OF
5600 1 0# DIXON, TOWN OF
560013# DOUGLAS, CITY OF
560018 DUBOIS, TOWN OF
560025# EAST THERMOPOLIS, TOWN OF
560093# ELK MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
560054# EVANSTON, CITY OF
560071# EVANSVILLE, TOWN OF
560080# FREMONT COUNTY *
560007# GILLETTE, CITY OF
5600 1 4# GLENROCK, TOWN OF
560022 GOSHEN COUNTY *
560050# GREEN RIVER, TOWN OF
560005# GREYBULL, TOWN OF
560072 GUERNSEY, TOWN OF
560097 HOT SPRINGS COUNTY*
560019# HUDSON, TOWN OF
560016 HULETT, TOWN OF
560052# JACKSON, TOWN OF
560099 JOHNSON COUNTY*
560028A KAYCEE, TOWN OF
560035# KEMMERER,TOWN OF
560 102 KIRBY, TOWN OF
560020# LANDER, CITY OF
560029# LARAMIE COUNTY*
560002# LARAMIE, CITY OF
560032# LINCOLN COUNTY *
560064 LINGLE, TOWN OF
560073A LOVELL, TOWN OF
560074# LUSK, TOWN OF
Participating in the National Flood Program
County
LINCOLN COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
SUBLETTE COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
NATRONA COUNTY
LARAMIE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CONVERSE COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CONVERSE COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
HOT SPRINGS
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
UINTA COUNTY
NATRONA COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
CAMPBELL COUNTY
CONVERSE COUNTY
GOSHEN COUNTY
SWEETWATER
COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
HOT SPRINGS
COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
CROOK COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
JOHNSON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
HOT SPRINGS
COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
LARAMIE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
GOSHEN COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
NIOBRARA COUNTY
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
02/19/86(R)
10/01/86(R)
08/16/88(R)
06/30/00
11/01/98(R)
02/02/84(R)
05/15/78(R)
05/15/84(R)
01/16/87(R)
09/15/77(R)
09/30/77(R)
09/01/00(R)
02/02/84(R)
02/19/87(R)
04/05/88(R)
05/28/75
09/29/78(R)
09/30/87(R)
10/17/78(R)
11/01/98(R)
05/23/86
1 1/04/87(R)
01/15/88(R)
07/17/78(R)
02/01/79(R)
05/15/78(R)
11/15/85(R)
03/01/86(R)
07/17/78(R)
02/19/80(R)
07/15/92(R)
11/19/97(R)
07/17/78(R)
04/01/99(R)
05/04/89(R)
03/12/98
10/01/86(R)
08/15/78(R)
01/10/01
09/01/78(R)
05/21/80(R)
07/16/79(R)
02/15/80(R)
05/22/00(R)
10/01/86(R)
03/18/86(R)
Current Effective
Map
02/19/86(M)
10/01/86(L)
08/16/88
11/01/98(L)
(NSFHA)
04/03/84
05/15/84
01/16/87(M)
10/15/82
03/02/94
09/01/00(L)
(NSFHA)
09/21/98
04/05/88
01/16/76
09/29/78
09/30/87
03/15/83
11/01/98(L)
03/23/99
1 1/04/87(M)
01/15/88
07/17/78
02/01/79
02/04/88
11/15/85(M)
03/01/86(L)
06/20/00
02/19/80(M)
(NSFHA)
(NSFHA)
07/17/78
04/01/99(L)
05/04/89
10/01/86(L)
08/15/78
01/19/82
03/02/94
10/16/96
09/21/98
(NSFHA)
10/01/86(L)
03/18/86(M)
Page 1 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
560075
560006#
560039A
560076A
560077
560092#
560036#
560057#
560098
560085#
560031 A
560086#
560040
560046#
560011
560096#
560021B
56005 1#
560012A
560047#
560044#
560078
560048#
560017#
560055A
560094#
560026#
560023
560053#
560089#
560043#
560056#
Community Name
LYMAN, TOWN OF
MANDERSON, TOWN OF
MEETEETSE, TOWN OF
MILLS, TOWN OF
MOORCROFT, TOWN OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW, TOWN OF
NATRONA COUNTY *
NEWCASTLE, CITY OF
OPAL, TOWN OF
PARK COUNTY*
PINE BLUFFS, TOWN OF
PLATTE COUNTY *
POWELL, CITY OF
RANCHESTER, TOWN OF
RAWLINS, CITY OF
RIVERSIDE,TOWN OF
RIVERTON, CITY OF
ROCK SPRINGS, CITY OF
SARATOGA, TOWN OF
SHERIDAN COUNTY *
SHERIDAN, CITY OF
SHOSHONI, TOWN OF
SUBLETTE COUNTY
SUNDANCE, TOWN OF
TEN SLEEP, TOWN OF
TETON COUNTY *
THERMOPOLIS, TOWN OF
TORRINGTON, CITY OF
UINTA COUNTY *
WASHAKIE COUNTY *
WHEATLAND, TOWN OF
WORLAND, CITY OF
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD
County
UINTA COUNTY
BIG HORN COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
NATRONA COUNTY
CROOK COUNTY
UINTA COUNTY
NATRONA COUNTY
WESTON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
LARAMIE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
PARK COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
SWEETWATER
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
SHERIDAN COUNTY
FREMONT COUNTY
SUBLETTE COUNTY
CROOK COUNTY
WASHAKIE COUNTY
TETON COUNTY
HOT SPRINGS
COUNTY
GOSHEN COUNTY
UINTA COUNTY
WASHAKIE COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
WASHAKIE COUNTY
78
70
10
Date Of Entry
[Emer or Reg]
07/15/85(R)
04/16/79(R)
10/01/86(R)
12/01/86(R)
03/01/86(R)
07/04/89(R)
08/15/78(R)
05/01/86(R)
05/09/97(R)
08/01/87(R)
05/01/86(R)
03/21/01
07/15/85(R)
04/15/88(R)
12/11/85(R)
07/02/87(R)
09/01/99(R)
07/16/79(R)
10/01/86(R)
08/01/86(R)
09/01/78(R)
05/28/86(R)
07/13/94
08/19/86(R)
05/01/86(R)
05/04/89(R)
07/17/78(R)
12/11/85(R)
12/15/78(R)
10/30/00
04/16/79(R)
09/15/78(R)
Current Effective
Map
(NSFHA)
04/16/79
10/01/86(L)
12/01/86(L)
03/01/86(L)
07/04/89
08/15/78
05/01/86(L)
08/01/87(L)
05/01/86(L)
03/28/78
(NSFHA)
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
07/02/87(M)
09/01/99(L)
07/20/98
10/01/86(L)
03/30/98
01/19/01
(NSFHA)
11/15/77
09/30/92
05/01/86(L)
05/04/89
01/20/99
(NSFHA)
12/15/78
08/29/78
04/16/79
01/19/82
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD
IDENTIFIED
24
(R) - Indicates Entry In Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Date Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
* - Unincorportated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 2 of 3
06/15/01
-------
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
—Not In The Program--
community Name
** WYOMING
560059 COWLEY, TOWN OF
560062 GLENDO, TOWN OF
560095# GRANGER, TOWN OF
560063 HANNA, TOWN OF
560066# MEDICINE BOW, TOWN OF
560049# PINEDALE, TOWN OF
560003 ROCK RIVER, CITY OF
560087# SWEETWATER COUNTY *
560079 UPTON, TOWN OF
County
BIG HORN COUNTY
PLATTE COUNTY
SWEETWATER
COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
CARBON COUNTY
SUBLETTE COUNTY
ALBANY COUNTY
SWEETWATER
COUNTY
WESTON COUNTY
Hazard Area
Identified
09/19/75
08/15/75
02/26/80
08/22/75
06/22/82(F)
03/18/86(F)
02/07/75
08/01/78
06/25/76
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
09/19/76
08/15/76
02/26/81
08/22/76
06/25/77
08/15/89(8)
02/07/76
08/01/79
06/25/77
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 0
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 1
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
TOTAL NOT IN PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 9
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 9
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
* - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Page 3 of 3
06/15/01
-------
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL ...INCOME POPULATIONS: Executive Order 12898 file:///G|/CD-ROM/execordr.htm
February 11, 1994
EXECUTIVE ORDER
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN MINORITY
POPULATIONS AND LOW-INCOME POPULATIONS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1-1. IMPLEMENTATION.
1-101. Agency Responsibilities. To the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, and consistent
with the principles set forth In the report on the National Performance Review, each Federal agency shall
make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States and its territories and
possessions, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of the
Marian islands.
1-102. Creation of an Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice (a) Within 3 months of the
date of this order, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency ("Administrator") or the
Administrator's designee shall convene an Interagency Federal Working Group on Environmental Justice
("Working- Group"). The Working Group shall comprise the heads of the following executive agencies
and offices, or their designees: (a)Department of Defense; (b) Department of Health and Human Services;
(c)Department of Housing and Urban Development; (d) Department of Labor; (e) Department of
Agriculture; (f) Department of Transportation; (g) Department of Justice; (h) Department of the Interior;
(i) Department of Commerce; (j) Department of Energy; (k) Environmental Protection Agency; (1) Office
of Management and Budget; (m) Office of Science and Technology Policy; (n) Office of the Deputy
Assistant to the President for Environmental Policy; (o) Office of the Assistant to the President for
Domestic Policy; (p) National Economic Council; (q) Council of Economic Advisers; and (r) such other
Government officials as the President may designate. The Working Group shall report to the President
through the Deputy Assistant to the President for Environmental Policy and the Assistant to the President
for Domestic Policy.
(b)The Working Group shall: (1) provide guidance to Federal agencies on criteria for identifying
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations and
low-income populations;
(2)coordinate with, provide guidance to, and serve as a clearinghouse for, each Federal agency as it
develops an environmental justice strategy as required by section 1-103 of this order, in order to ensure
that the administration, interpretation and enforcement of programs, activities and policies are undertaken
in a consistent manner; (3) assist in coordinating research by, and stimulating cooperation among, the
Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, and other agencies conducting research or other activities in
accordance with section 3-3 of this order;
Iof5 8/20/01 5:15 PM
-------
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL ...INCOME POPULATIONS: Executive Order 12898 file:///G|/CD-ROM/execordr.htm
(4) assist in coordinating data collection, required by this order;
(5) examine existing data and studies on environmental justice;
(6) hold public meetings at required in section 5-502(d) of this order; and
(7) develop interagency model projects on environmental justice that evidence cooperation among
Federal agencies.
1-103. Development of Agency Strategies, (a) Except as provided in section 6-605 of this order, each
Federal agency shall develop an agency-wide environmental justice strategy, as set forth in subsections
(b) - (e) of this section that identifies and addresses disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations. The environmental justice strategy shall list programs, policies, planning and public
participation processes, enforcement, and/or rulemakings related to human health or the environment that
should be revised to, at a minimum: (1) promote enforcement of all health and environmental statutes in
areas with minority populations and low-income populations: (2) ensure greater public participation; (3)
improve research and data collection relating to the health of and environment of minority populations
and low-income populations; and (4) identify differential patterns of consumption of natural resources
among minority populations and low-income populations. In addition, the environmental justice strategy
shall include, where appropriate, a timetable for undertaking identified revisions and consideration of
economic and social implications of the revisions.
(b) Within 4 months of the date of this order, each Federal agency shall identify an internal administrative
process for developing its environmental justice strategy, and shall inform the Working Group of the
process.
(c) Within 6 months of the date of this order, each Federal agency shall provide the Working Group with
an outline of its proposed environmental justice strategy.
(d) Within 10 months of the date of this order, each Federal agency shall provide the Working Group
with its proposed environmental justice strategy.
(e) Within 12 months of the date of this order, each Federal agency shall finalize its environmental justice
strategy and provide a copy and written description of its strategy to the Working Group. During the 12
month period from the date of this order, each Federal agency, as part of its environmental justice
strategy, shell identify several specific projects that can be promptly undertaken to address particular
concerns identified during the development of the proposed environmental justice strategy, and a
schedule for implementing those projects.
(f) Within 24 months of the date of this order, each Federal agency shall report to the Working Group on
its progress in implementing its agency-wide environmental justice strategy.
(g) Federal agencies shall provide additional periodic reports to the Working Group as requested by the
Working Group.
1-104. Reports to The President. Within 14 months of the date of this order, the Working Group shall
submit to the President, through the Office of the Deputy Assistant to the President for Environmental
Policy and the Office of the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, a report that describes the
2 of 5 8/20/01 5:15 PM
-------
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL ...INCOME POPULATIONS: Executive Order 12898 file:///G|/CD-ROM/execordr.htm
implementation of this order, and includes the final environmental justice strategies described in section
1-103(e) of this order.
Sec. 2-2. Federal Agency Responsibilities For Federal Programs. Each Federal agency shall conduct its
programs, policies, and activities that substantially affect human health or the environment, in a manner
that ensures that such programs, policies, and activities do not have the effect of excluding persons
(including populations) from participation in, denying persons (including populations) the benefits of, or
subjecting persons (including populations) to discrimination under, such, programs, policies, and
activities, because of their race, Color, or national origin.
Sec. 3 -3. Research, Data Collection, and Analysis
3-301. Human Health and Environmental Research and Analysis, (a) Environmental human health
research, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall include diverse segments of the population in
epidemiological and clinical studies, including segments at high risk from environmental hazards, such as
minority populations, low-income populations and workers who may be exposed to, substantial
environmental hazards.
(b) Environmental human health analyses, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall identify multiple
and cumulative exposures.
(c) Federal agencies shall provide minority populations and low-income populations the opportunity to
comment on the development and design of research strategies undertaken pursuant to this order.
3-302. Human Health and Environmental Data Collection and Analysis To the extent permitted by
existing law, including the Privacy Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. section 552a): (a) each federal agency,
whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect, maintain, and analyze information assessing and
comparing environmental and human health risks borne by populations identified by race, national origin,
or income. To the extent practical and appropriate, Federal agencies shall use this information to
determine whether their programs, policies, and activities have disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects on minority populations and low-income populations;
(b) In connection with the development and implementation of agency strategies in section 1-103 of this
order, each Federal agency, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect, maintain and analyze
information on the race, national origin, income level, and other readily accessible and appropriate
information for areas surrounding facilities or sites expected to have substantial environmental, human
health, or economic effect on the surrounding populations, when such facilities or sites become the
subject of a substantial Federal environmental administrative or judicial action. Such information shall be
made available to the public unless prohibited by law; and
(c) Each Federal agency, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect, maintain, and analyze
information on the race, national origin, income level, and other readily accessible and appropriate
information for areas surrounding Federal facilities that are: (1) subject to the reporting requirements
under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. section 11001-11050 as
mandated in Executive Order No. 12856; and (2) expected to have a substantial environmental, human
health, or economic effect on surrounding populations. Such information shall be made available to the
public unless prohibited by law.
(d) In carrying out the responsibilities in this section, each Federal agency, whenever practicable and
3 of 5 8/20/01 5:15 PM
-------
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL ...INCOME POPULATIONS: Executive Order 12898 file:///G|/CD-ROM/execordr.htm
appropriate, shall share information and eliminate unnecessary duplication of efforts through the use of
existing data systems and cooperative agreements among Federal agencies and with State, local, and
tribal governments.
Sec. 4-4. Subsistence Consumption Of Fish And Wildlife.
4-401. Consumption Patterns. Inorder to assist in identifying the need for ensuring protection of
populations with differential patterns of subsistence consumption offish and wildlife, Federal agencies,
whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect, maintain, and analyze information on the
consumption patterns of populations who principally rely on fish and/or wildlife for subsistence. Federal
agencies shall communicate to the public the risks of those consumption patterns.
4-402. Guidance. Federal agencies, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall work in a coordinated
manner to publish guidance reflecting the latest scientific information available concerning methods for
evaluating the human health risks associated with the consumption of pollutant-bearing fish or wildlife.
Agencies shall consider such guidance in developing their policies and rules.
Sec. 5-5. Public Participation and Access to Information (a) The public may submit recommendations to
Federal agencies relating to the incorporation of environmental justice principles into Federal agency
programs or policies. Each Federal agency shall convey such recommendations to the Working Group.
(b) Each Federal agency may, whenever practicable and appropriate, translate crucial public documents,
notices, and hearings relating to human health or the environment for limited English speaking
populations.
(c) Each Federal agency shall work to ensure that public documents, notices, and hearings relating to
human health or the environment are concise, understandable, and readily accessible to the public.
(d) The Working Group shall hold public meetings, as appropriate, for the purpose of fact-finding,
receiving public comments, and conducting inquiries concerning environmental justice. The Working
Group shall prepare for public review a summary of the comments and recommendations discussed at the
public meetings.
Sec. 6-6. General Provisions.
6-601. Responsibility for Agency Implementation. The head of each Federal agency shall be responsible
for ensuring compliance with this order. Each Federal agency shall conduct internal reviews and take such
other steps as may be necessary to monitor compliance with this order.
6-602. Executive Order No. 12250. This Executive order is intended to supplement but not supersede
Executive Order No. 12250, which requires consistent and effective implementation of various laws
prohibiting discriminatory practices in programs receiving Federal financial assistance. Nothing herein
shall limit the effect or mandate of Executive Order No. 12250.
6-6O3. Executive Order No. 12875. This Executive order is not intended to limit the effect or mandate of
Executive Order No. 12875.
6-604. Scope. For purposes of this order, Federal agency means any agency on the Working Group, and
such other agencies as may be designated by the President, that conducts any Federal program or activity
4 of 5 8/20/01 5:15 PM
-------
FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL ...INCOME POPULATIONS: Executive Order 12898 file:///G|/CD-ROM/execordr.htm
that substantially affects human health or the environment. Independent agencies are requested to comply
with the provisions of this order.
6-605. Petitions far Exemptions. The head of a Federal agency may petition the President for an
exemption from the requirements of this order on the grounds that all or some of the petitioning agency's
programs or activities should not be subject to the requirements of this order.
6-606. Native American Programs. Each Federal agency responsibility set forth under this order shall
apply equally to Native American programs. In addition the Department of the Interior, in coordination
with the Working Group, and, after consultation with tribal leaders, shall coordinate steps to be taken
pursuant to this order that address Federally- recognized Indian
Tribes.
6-607. Costs. Unless otherwise provided by law, Federal agencies shall assume the financial costs of
complying with this order.
6-608. General. Federal agencies shall implement this order consistent with, and to the extent permitted
by, existing law.
6-609. Judicial Review. This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive
branch and is not intended to, nor does it create any right, benefit, or trust responsibility, substantive or
procedural, enforceable at law or equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or
any person. This order shall not be construed to create any right to judicial review involving the
compliance or noncompliance of the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any other person with this
order.
William J. Clinton
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 11, 1994.
5 of 5 8/20/01 5:15 PM
------- |