U
   *  *
Quick Links
 Defendant Summary
Sentencing
 Plea Agreements
 Indictments/

 Informations
Environmental  Crimes
Case  Bulletin
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


 Office of Criminal Enforcement, Forensics and Training




 This bulletin summarizes publicized investigative activity and

 adjudicated cases conducted by OCEFT Criminal Investigation

 Division special agents, forensic specialists, and legal support staff.


 September 2014



 In This Edition:

• John Francis Mills, Terrance Allen — Region 2


• Mark Pullyblank, William Clements, Crane-Hogan Structural Systems, Inc. — Region 2


• Patrick Brightwell — Region 3


• Joseph L. Capano, Riverbend Community LLC — Region 3


• Zong Geng Chen — Region 4


• David Wayne Luther — Region 4


• Calumite Company LLC — Region 5


• Kelly Plating Company — Region 5


• Roger J. Dies — Region 6


• Xplor Energy SPV-1, Inc. — Region 6


• Nathan R. Garber — Region 8


• Raul Antonio Gonzalez Lopez — Region 9


• Marcelina Botello Charles, aka, Marcelina Botello Arias — Region 9
                     &EPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
EPA Pub. 310-N-14-009

-------
                                  Defendant Summary
Region
Defendants
Case Type/Status
Region 2
John Francis Mills, Terrance Allen
CAA & CERCLA/Failure to notify authorities in viola-
tion of CAA's asbestos work practice standards
Region 2
Mark Pullyblank, William Clem-
ents, Crane-Hogan Structural Sys-
CWA/lllegal unpermitted discharge of concrete slurry
into river and POTW
                  terns. Inc.
Region 3
Patrick Brightwell
CWA/Knowingly discharging a pollutant into river
without a permit and making false claims to U.S. gov-
ernment
Region 3
Joseph L. Capano, Riverbend
Community LLC
CWA/False statements and environmental violations
Region 4
Zong Geng Chen
FIFRA/lllegally repackaging pesticides and making
false statement to federal agents
Region 4
David Wayne Luther
CWA & Rivers and Harbors Act/Illegal dredging of
U.S. waters
                                             Page 2
                                                       EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                  Defendant Summary
Region
Defendants
Case Type/Status
Region 5
Calumite Company LLC
CAA/Making false statements
Region 5
Kelly Plating Company
CWA/II legally discharged high concentrations of met-
als into sewer system
Region 6
Roger J. Dies
CWA/Failure to report third party wastewater dis-
charges and obstruction of justice
Region 6
Xplor Energy SPV-1. Inc.
CWA/I I legally discharged water containing oil into
U.S. waters without a permit
Region 8
Nathan R. Garber
SDWA/Conspiracy to violate SDWA, false statements,
falsification of records, concealment or cover up of a
tangible object
Region 9
Raul Antonio Gonzalez Lopez
FIFRA/lllegal disposal of trash containing potentially
fatal brew of acids
Region 9
Marcelina Botello Charles, aka,
Marcelina Botello Arias
FIFRA/Conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and
possess with intent to distribute marijuana plants
into the Sequoia National Forest
                                              PageS
                                                        EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                        Sentencings

New York Property Owner and Manager Sentenced to 21 Months in Federal Prison for Conspiring to Vio-
late CAA -- On September 8, 2014, JOHN FRANCIS  MILLS, the owner of more than a dozen properties in
Malone, New York, and TERRANCE ALLEN, the maintenance manager of Mills' properties, were sentenced in
federal district court for the Northern District of New York to serve 21 months each in prison for conspiring to
                                             violate the Clean Air Act standards for the safe removal of
                                             asbestos during renovations of three of Mills' properties,
                                             for releasing asbestos into the environment and failing to
                                             notify the authorities, all in violation of the Clean Air Act's
                                             asbestos work practice standards, and the Comprehensive
                                             Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
                                             (CERCLA).  Mills' and Allen's prison sentences will be fol-
                                             lowed by two years of supervised release.  In addition,
                                             Mills must also pay a $25,000 fine and a $300 crime victim
                                             special assessment fee.
                                                   On Jan. 21, 2014, Mills  and Allen, both of Malone,
                                             New York, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to
                                             violate CERCLA. Mills also pleaded guilty to two counts of
                                             knowingly violating CERCLA for failing to immediately re-
                                             port  the release of more than a pound of asbestos from
                                             properties owned  by Mills. In  addition  to the conspiracy,
                                             Allen pleaded guilty to one count  of knowingly violating
                                             CERCLA. Mills owned the buildings from which more than
                                             260 linear feet of pipe wrap containing asbestos had been
                                             removed  by  one of Mills' employees. Mills and Allen di-
                                             rected that employee to remove the asbestos pipe wrap
                                             from three properties owned  by Mills, and managed  by
                                             Allen, who oversaw the asbestos  removal work.
                                                   As part of the plea, Mills and Allen admitted that
                                             that  they knowingly failed to  report to the National Re-
                                             sponse Center the release of asbestos, in the form of ther-
                                             mal system insulation, or "pipe wrap,"  that had been re-
                                             moved from the basement of buildings owned and operat-
                                             ed by  John   Mills, as  soon as they  knew  of the re-
                                             lease. They also admitted to illegally removing and dispos-
                                             ing of more than 260 linear feet of pipe wrap containing
                                             asbestos. Mills and Allen directed an employee to remove
                                             the pipe wrap containing asbestos without warning him or
                                             giving him adequate personal protective equipment. They
                                             transported  and  caused  others to  transport that  pipe
                                             wrap, which was in open bags,  in the open bed of a pickup
                                             truck. They further admitted that they conspired together
The asbestos containing materials found in the back
  of a U-Haul truck parked on property owned by
 John Mills. The truck was locked and EPA Special
       Agents got a warrant to search it.
                                              Page 4
                                                                       EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                        Sentencings
to violate CERCLA. The asbestos pipe wrap was deposited by the defendants in a UHaul-style box truck
owned by Mills and a shed maintained by the Malone Department of Public Works in an effort to conceal the
material from authorities.
       The Clean Air Act requires that owners of public buildings that contain asbestos follow federally es-
tablished work practice standards to ensure the safe removal of the asbestos.  The required standards in-
clude providing notice to the U.S. EPA before starting asbestos removal, adequately wetting the asbestos dur-
ing the removal and before disposal, and properly disposing of the asbestos at an EPA-approved disposal site.
       The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division and the New York State Depart-
ment of Labor Asbestos Control Bureau with assistance from the New York State Department of Environmen-
tal Conservation, the Malone Police Department and the Malone  Department of Public Works. The case was
prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Lana N. Pettus and Gary N. Donner, paralegal Puja Moozhikkattu and litigation
support specialist Elga Ozols of the Environmental Crimes Section  of the U.S. Department of Justice's Environ-
ment and Natural Resources Division.
Back to Defendant Summary
                                              PageS
EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                        Sentencings
Georgia Man Sentenced for Repackaging Pesticide and Making False Statement to Federal Agents -On Sep-
tember 17, 2014, ZONG GENG CHEN, of Augusta, Georgia, was sentenced in federal district court for the
Southern District of Georgia  to five months in prison followed by five months of home confinement  and
three years of supervised release for illegally repackaging pesticides to distribute to restaurants across the
country and for making a false statement to federal agents.
        According to the  evidence presented during the guilty plea and  sentencing hearings, EPA was re-
ferred to investigate Chen and his company,  Chen and Friends Pest Solutions, later renamed C&Z Pest Solu-
tions, after state investigators discovered repackaged pesticide inside a restaurant in Missouri that Chen  had
distributed.  In December, 2012, after an  EPA investigation, Chen entered into a  Consent Order and Final
Agreement with EPA where he agreed to cease repackaging pesticide and pay a fine of $9,433.01 for previ-
ous violations. In late 2013, investigators with EPA received information that additional repackaged insecti-
cide was recovered in restaurants in Indiana and Missouri. An investigation showed that these bottles of re-
packaged pesticide could be traced back to Chen and were distributed after Chen agreed to cease  repackag-
ing.  As part of the labeling  on his repackaged pesticide,  Chen warned  not to show the  pesticide to  the
"health department."
        Thereafter, special agents with  EPA  conducted a covert conversation with Chen, during which  the
agents posed as perspective customers  and Chen stated that he was allowed to sell pesticide.  A few days
later, EPA special agents held another conversation where they identified themselves and questioned Chen
about his repackaging pesticides and his compliance with the Consent Order and Final Agreement.  At that
time, Chen falsely assured agents that  he was not repackaging pesticides again  because  he knew  it  was
wrong.
       The case was investigated by EPA's  Criminal Investigation Division.  It is being prosecuted by Assistant
United States Attorney C. Troy Clark.
Back to Defendant Summary
                                              PageS                     EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                         Sentencings
Georgia Man Sentenced to 10 Months in Prison for Discharging Waste into Potomac River - On September
23, 2014, PATRICK BRIGHTWELL, of Bogart, Georgia, was sentenced in U.S, District Court for the District of
Columbia to 10 months in prison on charges that he orchestrated the discharge of waste into the  Potomac
River at East Potomac Park from 2009 through 2011, during the same period he managed the company hired
by the National Park Service to clean out the storm water sewer system on the National Mall.
       Brightwell  pled guilty in June 2014 to one count of violating the Clean Water Act by  knowingly dis-
charging a pollutant without a  permit and one count of presenting false claims to the United States. Upon
completion of his  prison term, Brightwell will be placed on three years of supervised release. He also was or-
dered to pay $270,667 in restitution to the National Park Service, representing the losses for the work that
                                                             was  not properly performed. Brightwell
                                                             also  must pay a  forfeiture money judg-
                                                             ment totaling $230,899. An eight-count
                                                             indictment  of Brightwell  was  unsealed
                                                             following his arrest  in  Georgia on De-
                                                            jcember 5, 2013. The remaining charges
                                                             were dismissed as part of the guilty plea.
                                                             According to  a  statement  of offense
                                                            I signed  by the government and defend-
                                                             ant,  from  in or  about 2007 through
                                                             2011, Brightwell was a manager of a
                                                             company that  had a contract with the
                                                             National Park Service to clean the storm
                                                             water  sewer system  on the National
 Brightwell directed his employees and subcontractors to discharge waste from  Mall. The contract required that waste
  this vacuum truck into storm drains or manholes which ultimately led to the  removed from the Mall's storm drains
                        Potomac River.                         and oM_water separators be disposed of
at a proper disposal facility in compliance with District of Columbia regulations and federal law.
       Brightwell  hired employees  and subcontractors to perform work  under the contract and oversaw
their work from 2008 to 2011. To clean the structures, Brightwell and his company used a vacuum truck, a
vehicle designed to gather, store, and transport such waste. When the storage compartment in the vacuum
truck became full, workers would have to discharge waste from the truck prior to continuing the cleaning.
       In 2009, 2010,  and 2011, according to the statement of offense, Brightwell directed his employees
and subcontractors to discharge waste from the vacuum truck at a storm drain near a parking lot in East Po-
tomac Park, across Ohio Drive from the Potomac River. Brightwell concealed these discharges from the Na-
tional Park Service and police. Workers also discharged waste at a manhole  near Fort McNair in the District of
Columbia.
       During this period, Brightwell continued to invoice the National Park Service for cleaning services, but
concealed and did not disclose that  the waste was not being properly disposed, as required by the contract.
From 2009 through 2011, Brightwell's company received approximately $406,000 in payments from the Na-
tional Park Service related to the contract.
                                              Page?
EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                        Sentencings
      According to the statement of offense, the employees and subcontractors illegally dumped waste at
the parking lot approximately two-thirds of the time, and dumped the waste at a proper disposal facility in
Fort Washington, Md., about one-third of the time.
      The subcontractor, B&P Environmental LLC, and a B&P employee working on June 6, 2011, both pled
guilty in November 2014 to violations of the Clean Water Act before the U.S. District Court. As part of their
pleas, both the company and employee agreed to cooperate with the government's investigation.  Both the
company and employee are awaiting sentencing.
      The case was investigated  by  EPA's Criminal Investigation Division, and the U.S. Park Police and sup-
ported by environmental protection specialists. It was prosecuted by Senior Trial Attorney Lana Pettus of the
Department  of Justice's Environmental Crimes Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan P. Hooks of the
U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Anthony Saler and Catherine Con-
nelly of the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section assisted with the  case.  Further assistance was
provided by Paralegal Specialist Ashleigh Nye of DOJ's Environmental Crimes Section and Paralegal Specialists
Krishawn Graham and Donna Galindo of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Back to Defendant Summary
                                              PageS
EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                         Sentencings
California Waste Disposer Gets Jail Term for Dumping Toxic Mix of Chemicals in Public Landfill -On Sep-
tember 2, 2014, RAUL ANTONIO GONZALEZ LOPEZ was sentenced to seven months in custody in federal dis-
trict court for the Southern District of California for illegally disposing of trash containing a potentially fatal
                                        brew of acids and potassium cyanide.
                                              In pleading guilty,  Gonzalez  Lopez  admitted that on
                                        March 12, 2011, he picked up trash at We Lend More, a business
                                        located in National City, California. As he was aware, this trash
                                        included containers of acid and potassium cyanide.  The follow-
                                        ing day, Gonzalez Lopez dumped the chemicals (which included
                                       j federally regulated hazardous wastes such as nitric acid and po-
                                       jtassium  cyanide) in the Miramar Landfill. Due to  the dangerous
                                        nature of these chemicals, they are prohibited from being dis-
                                        posed at the Miramar Landfill. Gonzalez Lopez was  arrested on
                                       January  14,  2014, in Mexico and  extradited to the United States
                                        to face these charges.
                                              According to Joe Lowry, chief scientist for  EPA, when po-
                                       Itassium  cyanide and acids are combined they produce a  deadly
                                        hydrogen cyanide gas. One breath of pure hydrogen  cyanide gas
                                        would be enough to kill a person, and 50 ppm of hydrogen cya-
                                        nide  is  the  level that has been determined  to be immediately
                                        dangerous to life or health. Lowry viewed the evidence from the
                                        case and prepared a dispersion model showing the  threat area
The emergency response, including the Hazardous                          Ł,             .,
                                        where the concentration of hydrogen cyanide is greater than or
                                        equal to 50 ppm, assuming a wind of 3  mph. This zone extends
                                        approximately  71 yards from the  initial point of combination,
and anyone within 30 yards when the chemicals combined would have been killed instantly.
       In February of 2011, We Lend More and its owner, Marc Vogel, were convicted by a jury of aiding and
abetting the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste. The trial evidence indicated that the acid
(in a breakable glass bottle) and cyanide  (in aged plastic containers) were disposed of together in the same
cardboard box, which was dumped at the landfill. Because the  landfill operators use heavy equipment on a
regular basis to compact the face  of the land-
fill,  such  activity would be expected to cause
the containers to break and the chemicals (in
the same box) to combine, causing  instant
death to  the landfill operator and  anyone else
within 30 yards (such as other landfill person-
nel or customers).
       The  case  was investigated  by  EPA's
Criminal Investigation Division and  the FBI.
                                             Some of the hazardous waste recovered at the Miramar Landfill, in-
Back to Defendant Summary                             eluding Nitric Acid and Potassium Cyanide.
Incident Response Team, the day they found the
   hazardous waste at the Miramar Landfill.
                                              Page 9
                                                                       EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                         Sentencings
California Woman Sentenced for Growing Marijuana in Sequoia National Forest and Damaging Public Lands
-- On September 15, 2014,  MARCELINA BOTELLO CHARLES, aka MARCELINA BOTELLO ARIAS (BOTELLO), of
Hemet, California, was sentenced in federal district court for the Eastern District of California to four years
and two months in prison for her involvement in a marijuana cultivation operation that had adverse environ-
mental impacts on public lands.
      On May 19,  2014, Botello pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture,  distribute and possess with
intent to distribute 9,746 marijuana plants grown in the Lilly Canyon area of the Sequoia National Forest and
distributing Ratone: Fosfuro de Zinc, an illegal rodenticide,
and QuFuran, an illegal insecticide, in violation of the Fed-
eral Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
      According  to court documents, Botello and  a com-
panion delivered the illegal pesticides and other materials
to the forest  cultivation  site.  The cultivation operation
caused extensive  environmental  damage. Native oak trees
and other vegetation were killed or cut down to make room
for the marijuana plants. The soil was tilled and fertilizers,
pesticides, and rodenticides were spread throughout the
site.  Cans of rat poison and insecticide were found at both
the cultivation site and a residence  Botello rented  in Bak-
ersfield. During the execution of a search warrant, agents
also  found marijuana seeds, other  items associated  with
the cultivation  operation, and $2,634 in cash.
      Ratone: Forsfuro de Zinc contains zinc phosphide,
an inorganic rodenticide that is highly toxic to mammals
and fish. A single  swallow of zinc phosphide could be fatal
to a  small child. Zinc phosphide can  be expected to persist
in soil for approximately two weeks. When  it breaks down
in soil it can release phosphine gas.  QuFuran contains car-
bofuran, a highly toxic insecticide. In granular form, a single
grain will kill a  bird; for humans, one quarter of a teaspoon
is a sufficient dose to be fatal. It is  also a powerful endo-
crine disrupter. Effective December 31, 2009, EPA cancelled
all food tolerances for carbofuran.
      Upon completion of her prison sentence, Botello will
be on supervised  release for five years. She  was also ordered to pay $4,294 in restitution to the U.S. Forest
Service to cover the cost of cleaning up the grow site. Earlier this year, Botello's co-defendant, Julio Cesar Vil-
lanueva  Cornejo was sentenced to six years in prison for his involvement in the conspiracy.
      The case was investigated  by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations,
and the Kern County Sheriff's Office.  It was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Karen  Escobar.
Back to Defendant Summary
Smuggled Mexican pesticides involved in this
            investigation
                                               Page 10
             EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                     Plea Agreements
Indiana Manufacturer Pleads Guilty to CAA False Statement Violations - On September 18, 2014, CALU-
MITE COMPANY LLC (Calumite), a manufacturer of an additive used in the production of glass, entered a
plea of guilty in federal district court for the Northern District of Indiana for Clean Air Act false statement
violations. The company has agreed to pay a $325,000 fine, serve a two-year term of probation, and imple-
ment an environmental compliance plan that includes an annual environmental compliance training pro-
gram.
       Calumite, located near the shores of Lake Michigan in
Portage, Indiana, manufactures and sells a powdery substance
of the same name to various glass manufacturers. The compa-
ny collects slag, a waste product of the steel industry, dries it
in a hot gas oven, crushes it into a fine powder, and then ships
it off-site to glass manufacturers, who use it as an additive to
lower the temperature at which glass can be produced.
       Calumite's Portage facility was subject to a Title V Clean
Air Act Operating Permit issued by the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM).  Among other things, the
permit required that Calumite operate, maintain, and monitor
                                                                    Calumite Company LLC
several "baghouses" on-site that are used to control and minimize emissions of a fine particulate.  One of the
baghouses, known as the loadout baghouse, was used to collect emissions of particulate that occurred dur-
ing the loading of product onto tractor trailers and rail cars for shipment to customers.
       A differential pressure gauge (DP  gauge)  attached to each baghouse continuously monitored and
measured the efficiency and effectiveness of the baghouses and helped to determine whether they were op-
erating properly.  Calumite's permit required that DP gauges on the baghouses be read daily, while the
baghouses were operating, and that the results be recorded on daily maintenance log sheets.  The company
also was required to submit quarterly reports to IDEM that stated whether the company was in compliance
with permit requirements.
       From Dec. 5, 2008, through late July 2009, the company did not maintain the loadout baghouse in
operating condition and the DP gauge was broken. Nevertheless, during this same time period, employees
continued to load tractor trailers and  rail cars with product for shipment off -site. Calumite  employees know-
ingly continued to routinely fill out daily logs that falsely reflected DP gauge monitoring readings that were
within the range allowed by the permit,  and caused false information to be submitted to IDEM in the compa-
ny's quarterly reports.
       The Clean Air Act makes it a crime to knowing make a material false statement or omit  material infor-
mation from a document that is required to be filed or maintained under the statute. Both the daily mainte-
nance logs and the quarterly reports were required by Calumite's permit and the Clean Air Act.
       The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division, a member of the  Northern District
of Indiana Environmental Crimes Task Force. It was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern
District of Indiana and the Environmental Crimes Section of the Justice Department's Environment and Natu-
ral Resources Division.
Back to Defendant Summary
                                             Page 11
                                                                       EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                     Plea Agreements
North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty to CWA and Rivers and Harbors Act Violation -- On September 29, 2014,
DAVID WAYNE LUTHER, of Surf City, North Carolina, entered a guilty plea in federal district court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina to violating the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and  Harbors Act. According
to information in the public record, on July 29, 2012, officers with the North Carolina  Marine Patrol respond-
ed to a complaint of dredging in waters near Surf City, North Carolina.
       North Carolina  Marine Patrol officers determined that Luther was "prop washing" with the M/V The
Raven. The officers ordered Luther to cease and desist dredging activities. Approximately three hours later, on
July 29, 2012, North Carolina Marine Patrol received another complaint of dredging activity by Luther. On
July 30, 2012, a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) representative took measurements at the violation
site and confirmed unauthorized dredging activity. On August 10, 2012, CAMA issued a Notice  of Violation
and Request to Cease Unauthorized Development to Luther. A copy of the Notice was hand delivered to him
on August 14, 2012.
       During the morning of August 14, 2012, CAMA received an anonymous complaint alleging dredging
activity during the night time hours involving the M/V The Raven at the violation site. During the afternoon of
August 14, 2012, a multi-agency site visit confirmed additional dredging activity at the original violation site.
The violation site was determined to be a Primary Nursery Area for oysters.
       The maximum penalty that Luther faces at sentencing for both counts is a total of two years imprison-
ment, and a  maximum total fine of $200,000. Pursuant to his plea agreement, Luther has also agreed to pur-
chase .21 acres of coastal wetland restoration in order to compensate for impacts to wetlands and other ju-
risdictional waters impacted from his criminal conduct prior to sentencing hearing.  If he fails to make the
purchase,  Luther has agreed not to contest a $50,000 additional fine.
       The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division, the North Carolina State Bureau of
Investigation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and North Carolina  Marine Patrol. It is being prosecuted by
Assistant United States Attorney Banumathi Rangarajan.
 Back to Defendant Summary
                                              Page 12                     EPA Bulletin— September 2014

-------
                                    Plea Agreements
Garber would inject saltwater into this well without
   first having performed a well integrity test.
Montana Saltwater Disposal Well Operator Pleads Guilty to Multiple Felony Charges in Connection with
Operation of Well -- On September 26, 2014, NATHAN R. GARBER, of Kalispell,  Montana, pleaded guilty in
federal court for the District of North Dakota to eleven felony charges stemming from the operation of a salt-
                                            water disposal well near Dickinson, in Stark County, North
                                            Dakota.  Garber pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy
                                            to violate the Safe Drinking Water  Act  and defraud the
                                            United States. He also pleaded guilty to five  counts of vio-
                                            lating the Safe  Drinking Water Act, two counts of making
                                            false statements, two counts of falsification of records and
                                            one count of concealment or cover up of a tangible object.
                                            The well, named the Halek  5-22, received "produced wa-
                                            ter"  constituting "brine  and  other wastes" commonly and
                                            generically referred to as "saltwater." "Saltwater" in this
                                            context covers a wide array  of drilling waste fluids, includ-
                                            ing hydraulic fracturing fluid, which is water combined with
                                            chemical additives such as biocides,  polymers and  "weak
acids." The EPA has stressed that this water is  often saltier than seawater and can "contain toxic metals and
radioactive substances."
       According to an agreed-upon factual statement filed in court, Garber admitted to conspiring with
others in a number of coordinated and illegal acts. For instance, Garber injected saltwater into  the well with-
out first having the state of North Dakota witness a test of the well's integrity, causing a regulator to deter-
mine  that there was no assurance as  to the  integrity of the well and that "the fluid could  be going any-
where." Garber also violated a February 2012 order from the state to stop injecting until a well integrity test
was done. When questioned by the state about these injections, Garber made false statements in a March 6,
2012 email where he denied that these injections occurred.
      The well failed a pressure test on Feb. 2, 2012, and Garber continued to inject saltwater even though
he knew that the well did not have integrity and thus posed an increased risk of contaminating ground water.
      Further, Garber moved a device called a "packer" up the wellbore in violation of the  well's permit,
without first getting approval from the state. A properly placed packer is an essential  device to maintaining
integrity of the well and ensuring wastewater does not escape into surrounding soil and groundwater. Then,
Garber gave false information to a state inspector regarding the depth of the packer.
      A search warrant was executed at the well on November 20, 2013, and it  was confirmed  that the
packer had been moved up in the wellbore and was significantly higher than the depth  that had been initially
represented by Garber. Despite illegally moving the packer on February 14, 2012, Garber continued to inject
saltwater into the well until  on or about March 5, 2012, when a state employee shut the well in.
      The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division. Significant  cooperation was pro-
vided by the North Dakota Industrial Commission.  The case is being prosecuted  by the United States Attor-
ney's Office for the District of North Dakota and the  Environmental Crimes  Section of the Justice Depart-
ment's Environment and Natural Resources Division.
Back to Defendant Summary
                                            Page 13
                                                                        EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                     Plea Agreements
                                                                 Tanker being washed out at BRTW
Louisiana Businessman Pleads Guilty to Environmental Crime and Obstruction of Justice - On September 2,
2014, ROGER J. DIES, of Zachary, Louisiana, pled guilty in federal district court for the Middle District of
Louisiana for failing to report third party wastewater discharges in violation of the  Clean Water Act and ob-
struction of justice.  Dies also admitted to the forfeiture allega-
tions  contained in the indictment,  which  was  previously re-
turned by a federal grand jury in  December of 2013. Dies faces
a maximum  sentence up  to 13 years in prison and substantial
fines.
       According to the written  plea agreement entered  into
between Dies and the United States, Dies owned and operated
Baton Rouge Tank Wash (BRTW), a business focused on wash-1
ing the  interior of tanks that  hauled chemical and food-grade
loads  aboard  trucks.  BRTW was  permitted  to  discharge
wastewater  resulting from the tank  washes into the  municipal
sewer system,  subject to  certain  requirements and limitations.
From in or about March of 2009,  however, through September |
of 2012, Dies failed to notify DPW that he had begun discharg-
ing third party wastewater, despite knowing  that notification
was required by his permit. Dies also failed  to submit monthly
and daily logs reflecting all wastewater discharged from the fa-
cility. Dies was asked about the nature  of his  business, on nu-
merous occasions,  and he routinely misled  and/or made false
representations, intended to conceal the fact that BRTW  was
accepting substantial quantities of third  party wastewater.
Then, in late 2012, as a federal grand jury investigation  into the          Waste from a tanker wash out
matter was underway,  Dies provided the grand jury  with false documents that  had been  created with the
goal of  disguising BRTW's third party wastewater business. As the investigation continued, in February of
          t*j^^Hkn -MM^^^Ht* J-fm**'!/!,?,;":1?! 2013, Dies provided the grand  jury with false testimony
  ravfc           \s'M   HMf"1* i  • »*}.v   •=»    L..J 'n which he represented that he had produced all docu-
    HKfl   SUbcJJL-i         ;V*5t_LMEr%
                                               ments that were responsive to  the subpoenas, when, in
                                  '^^mi. (I -jufact> ne knew that numerous responsive documents had
                                •* ?.  3ni      ~ not been produced.
                                                     The  investigation is  being conducted  by  EPA's
                                               Criminal  Investigation  Division,  the  U.S.  Attorney's
                                               Office, and the Criminal Investigation Division of the Lou-
                                               isiana  Department of Environmental Quality. It is  being
                                               prosecuted  by Assistant  United States Attorneys  Corey
Aerial view of BRTW showing how close it was too substa-  R Amundson, who serves as Chief of the Criminal Divi-
                                               sion, and Alan A. Stevens, who serves as a Deputy Chief.
                                               Back to Defendant Summary
tion of the Baton Rouge Police Dept who made several com-
plaints of strong odors from BRTW, one of which resulted in
         evacuation of the substation in 2008.
                                              Page 14
                                                                        EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                                      Plea Agreements
Ohio Company Pleads Guilty to Making Illegal Discharges into Sewer System  -- On September 3,  2014,
Cleveland, Ohio-based KELLY PLATING COMPANY pleaded guilty in federal district court for the Northern Dis-
trict of Ohio to making illegal discharges with high concentrations of metals such as chrome and zinc into the
sewer system, which in turn,  after treatment, discharges to Lake Erie. The company pleaded guilty to one
count of conspiracy to violate  the Clean Water Act and one count of violating an approved pretreatment pro-
gram.
       An employee at Kelly Plating bypassed the pollution control equipment and discharged partially treat-
ed wastewater and sludge directly into the sewer system. These discharges contained high concentrations of
chrome and zinc. This happened at least 14 times between March and May, 2012, according to court  docu-
ments.
       Under the terms of the  plea  agreement, both parties agree to recommend to the court that Kelly
Plating pay a $50,000 fine as well as a $25,000 community service payment. The community service payment
will be made to a charitable organization to be presented to the court prior to sentencing. The charitable or-
ganization will use the payment to improve water quality in Northeast Ohio, according to the plea agree-
ment.  Sentencing is scheduled for  Dec. 11.  Criminal charges remain pending against a Kelly Plating employ-
ee who was indicted earlier this year.
       The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division, the Ohio EPA, the  Ohio Bureau of
Criminal Investigation, and Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District.  It is being prosecuted by Special  Assis-
tant U.S. Attorney Brad Beeson.
Back to Defendant Summary
The picture to the left shows the discharge point (crock) to the sewer. The piping sections that form the crock had been installed
 to inhibit spills from flo wing into the discharge manhole. This picture was taken upon entry into the facility on the date of the
search warrant.  The "permitted" discharge is the hard-piped line going into the bottom of the crock. The source is the pretreat-
  ment system behind and to the right of it. The hoses going into the top of the crock are unpermitted discharge sources. The
  small hose going into the crock led to the pump depicted in the picture on the right, which was pumping from the pit (sludge
                                holding tank) in the background of the photo.
                                               Page 15                    EPA Bulletin— September 2014

-------
                                     Plea Agreements
Two New York Men and Company That Employed Them Plead Guilty to CWA Violations -- On September
15, 2014, MARK PULLYBLANK, of Caledonia, New York, WILLIAM CLEMENTS, of Victor, New York, and
CRANE-HOGAN STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, INC., based in Spencerport, New York, pled guilty in federal district
court for the Northern District of New York to violations of the Clean Water Act.  Sentencing will take place
on January 23, 2014.
       Crane-Hogan  is a company that  uses hydro-demolition to  renovate  concrete structures. Hydro-
demolition uses high pressure water  to remove concrete from buildings such as parking garages, dams,
bridges, and  highways prior to resurfacing. The waste-water from the hydro-demolition process contains a
slurry of industrial waste including concrete residue which has a highly caustic pH and total suspended solids,
both of which are pollutants under the Clean  Water Act. Pullyblank was Crane-Hogan's project manager in
charge  of renovation projects at the Binghamton Governmental Center Parking Garage and Johnson City Wil-
                                                        j son Hospital  Parking  Garage  throughout
                                                         2008 and 2009. He directed workers to dis-
                                                         charge concrete slurry into the Susquehan-
                                                         na River for portions of two years, and into
                                                         the  Binghamton-Johnson  City   Publically
                                                         Owned  Treatment Works  (POTW) during
                                                         the summer 2009, both without Clean Wa-
                                                         ter Act permits and  without treatment for
                                                         the high pH. Clements was also  a project
                                                         manager in charge of the Johnson City Wil-
                                                         son Hospital Parking Garage renovation who
                                                         participated in  the unpermitted POTW dis-
                                                        |charges in 2009.
                                                               Pullyblank  and Crane-Hogan both
                                                        ' plead guilty to felony violations of the Clean
                                                         Water Act. Clements pled guilty to a misde-
                                                         meanor  Clean  Water  Act violation.  Pully-
blank faces a maximum possible penalty of three years in prison and a $700,000 fine,  plus supervised release
thereafter. Crane-Hogan faces a maximum fine of $750,000  and five years of probation. If the plea agree-
ment is accepted by the court, Crane-Hogan will be required to prepare and implement an environmental
compliance plan to alter its policies and practices so as to reduce the likelihood of future criminal environ-
mental conduct.  Clements faces  a  maximum possible  term of incarceration of one year and  a fine  of
$350,000 plus a term of supervised release.
       The case was  investigated  by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division and the New York State Depart-
ment of Environmental Conservation, Bureau of Environmental Crimes Investigations, Assistance was provid-
ed by the New York State Office of General Services,  the Binghamton City Engineer, and the  Binghamton-
Johnson City Publically Owned Treatment Works. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States
Attorney Craig Benedict.
Back to Defendant Summary
Pullyblank directed employees to discharge concrete slurry into the
                  Susquehana River.
                                             Page 16
                                                                    EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                               Indictments/Information!
Delaware Real Estate Developer Indicted for False Statements and Environmental Violations --On Septem-
ber 23, 2014, JOSEPH L. CAPANO, of Middletown, Delaware, and RIVERBEND COMMUNITY LLC, a  Delaware
Corporation, were indicted by a grand jury in federal district court for the District of Delaware  on three
counts of making false statements to federal authorities and conspiracy to violate the Clean Water Act.  Ca-
pano faces up to five years of imprisonment for the false statement charges, three years of imprisonment on
the Clean Water Act conspiracy, and a maximum of $250,000 fine for each offense. Riverbend faces a fine of
up to $500,000 for the Clean Water Act conspiracy.
      The indictment alleges that Capano and Riverbend Community LLC conspired with others to  discharge
pollutants into wetlands subject to federal jurisdiction without a permit, during development of Riverbend at
Old New Castle, a residential development located in New Castle, Delaware.  The  indictment focuses on
earthmoving, construction and excavation activities that Capano, on behalf of Riverbend Community LLC, di-
rected employees and contractors to perform on the entrance road to the development, known as the cause-
way. Specifically, the defendants directed contractors and employees to expand the causeway into wetlands
subject to federal jurisdiction.  The defendants also directed contractors and employees to place a  water
main pipe through the causeway wetlands  area,  even after the Army Corps of Engineers instructed the de-
fendants to stop performing construction in wetland areas.
      In addition, the indictment alleges  that Capano knowingly and willfully made multiple  false  state-
ments to the Army Corps of Engineers  regarding when the water main  pipe was installed in the causeway
wetland areas, including executing a false affidavit, and that he withheld material information from  the Army
Corps of Engineers.
      The case was investigated by EPA's  Criminal Investigation Division.  It is being prosecuted by United
States Attorney  Jennifer K. Welsh, District of Delaware. The charges in the  indictment are only allegations.
The defendant is presumed  innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
 Back to Defendant Summary
                                             Page 17
EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------
                               Indictments/Information!
Oklahoma Corporation Charged With Felony CWA Violation -- On September 15, 2014, XPLOR ENERGY SPV-
1, INC. (XPLOR), an Oklahoma corporation located in Southlake, Texas, was charged in federal district court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana in a one-count bill of information with knowingly violating the Clean Wa-
ter Act in connection with their oil and gas production activities in the Breton Sound Area of the Gulf of Mexi-
co.
       According to the bill of information, from on or about October 1, 2009, and continuing through No-
vember 18, 2011, in the navigable waters of the United States and within the Eastern District of Louisiana,
Xplor, by and through its agents and employees acting within the scope of their agency and employment and
for the intended  benefit of the defendant, did knowingly discharge and cause to be knowingly discharged a
pollutant, namely,  produced water containing oil, from a point source (injection lines and disposal wells
attached to the MP 35 Platform) into a water of the United States without a permit.
       The case was investigated by EPA's Criminal Investigation Division and the Criminal Investigation Divi-
sion of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States
Attorney Matthew Coman.
       The charges in the information are only allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent until and
unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Back to Defendant Summary
   EPA Pub. 310-N-14-009
                                             Page 18
EPA Bulletin—September 2014

-------