Estimated Summer Hot-Soak
Distributions for Denver's Ken Caryl
I/M Station Fleet
Final Report
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
-------
Estimated Summer Hot-Soak
Distributions for Denver's Ken Caryl
I/M Station Fleet
Final Report
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
EPA Contract No. EP-C-06-0-80
Work Assignment No.5-4
NOTICE
This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or
positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data
that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to
facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of
technical developments.
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA-420-R-14-008
March 2014
-------
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
Estimated Summer
Hot-Soak Distributions
for Denver's
Ken Caryl I/M Station
Fleet
Final Report
Version 8
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
Februarys, 2012
Revised by:
Eastern Research Group, Inc. and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
December 20, 2013
-------
ERG: 0218.05.004.001
Estimated Summer Hot-Soak Distributions
for Denver's Ken Caryl I/M Station Fleet
FINAL REPORT
Version 8
as part of
Work Assignment 5-4
Submitted to:
Constance Hart
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Submitted by:
Timothy H. DeFries
Cynthia F. Palacios
Meredith F. Weatherby
Alan P. Stanard
Sandeep Kishan
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
3508 Far West Blvd., Suite 210
Austin, TX 78731
February 8, 2012
Revised December 20, 2013
3508 Far West Blvd, Suite 210, Austin, TX 78731 Phone:512-407-1820 - Fax: 512-419-C
Arlington, VA • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Boston, MA • Chantilly, VA - Chicago, II • Cincinnati, OH • Hershey, PA
Prairie Village, KS •• Lexington, MA - Nashua, NH •• Research Triangle Park, NC Sacramento, CA,
T:\Library\EPA-131220.docx
Equal Opportunity Employer - Printed on 100% Post-Consumer Recycled Paper
-------
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary 1-1
2.0 Background 2-1
2.1 Laboratory Measurement of Evaporative Emissions 2-2
2.2 The Denver Inspection and Maintenance Program 2-3
2.3 Measurement of Evaporative Emissions by Remote-Sensing 2-4
2.3.1 Development of Evaporative Screening Indices 2-4
2.3.2 A Screening Index for Evaporative Emissions 2-7
2.3.3 Unequal Probability Sampling Using an Evaporative Index 2-8
2.4 Glossary of Terms 2-8
3.0 Methods 3-1
3.1 Project Goals 3-1
3.1.1 Key Variables 3-1
3.1.2 Target Population and Sampled Fleet 3-1
3.2 Screening, Sampling, and Recruitment 3-2
3.2.1 Sampling 3-2
3.2.2 Recruitment 3-3
3.3 Vehicle Inspection (The "Modified California Method") 3-4
3.4 Measuring Hot-Soak Emissions (portable SHED) 3-5
3.4.1 Performance 3-7
3.5 Procedure 3-8
3.6 Data Quality-Control Procedures 3-12
4.0 Analysis 4-1
4.1 Data Examination 4-1
4.2 Distributions of Hot-Soak Emissions 4-4
4.2.1 Calculation of Weighted Frequencies 4-6
4.2.2 Utility of the Screening Index 4-7
4.2.3 Effectiveness of the Screening Index 4-10
4.3 Discussion 4-13
4.3.1 Fleet Composition and Representativeness 4-13
4.3.2 Effects of Ambient Conditions 4-14
4.3.3 Interpretation 4-19
4.3.4 Assessment of Measurement Repeatability 4-23
5.0 Summary and Conclusions 5-1
6.0 References 6-1
Appendix A Measurement of Exhaust and Evaporative Hydrocarbons by Remote-Sensing A-l
Appendix B Comparison of RSD Evaporative Emissions Index EI23 with Known Running-Loss
Emission Rates B-l
Appendix C Sample Blank Data Packet C-l
Appendix D Comparison of PSHED and LSHED D-l
Appendix E Descriptions and Data for Non-Participating Vehicles E-l
Appendix F Descriptions and Data for Participating Vehicles F-l
-------
List of Tables
Table 3-1. Sampling Fractions by EI23 Bin 3-2
Table 4-1. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group for Screened Vehicles 4-2
Table 4-2. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group for Eligible Vehicles in the
Sample 4-2
Table 4-3. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group for Participating Vehicles 4-2
Table 4-4. Solicitation Response Rate by Model-Year Group 4-5
Table 4-5. Solicitation Response Rate by EI23 Bin 4-5
Table 4-6. Counts of Measured Vehicles Having Index and PSHED Values Less Than and
Greater Than Designated Thresholds for the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group 4-9
Table 4-7. Sums of Final Weights Having Index and PSHED Values Less Than and Greater
Than Designated Thresholds for the 1991 -1995 Model-Year Group 4-9
Table 4-8. Sample Calculations for a 1.0 g/Qhr High-PSHED Definition, by Model-Year Group
4-11
Table 4-9. Selected Percentile Values for PSHED Measurements (g/Qhr), based on Weighted
Distributions 4-13
Table 4-10. Control and Measurement of Factors Affecting Evaporative Emissions 4-14
Table 4-11. Fractions of PSHED Values Exceeding Selected Hot-Soak Emission Thresholds
(Based on Weighted Distributions) 4-20
Table 4-12. Results of Physical Inspection: Identified Vapor Sources by Location for Two
Model-Year Groups 4-21
Table 4-14. Fractions of PSHED Values Exceeding Selected Hot-Soak Emission Thresholds
(based on weighted distributions) 4-26
List of Figures
Figure 2-1. Attenuation Time Series for an Experimental Condition Simulating Zero
Evaporative Emissions (0.00 scfh propane) and Exhaust Emissions (30 scfm of 1100
ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry) 2-6
Figure 2-2. Attenuation Measurements for Three Pollutants vs. CO2 Attenuation: Zero
Evaporative Emissions (0.00 scfh propane) and Simulated Exhaust Emissions (30
scfm of 1100ppmC3HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry) 2-6
Figure 2-3. Attenuation Measurements for Three Pollutants vs. CO2 Attenuation: Simultaneous
Simulated Evaporative Emissions (15 scfh propane) and Simulated Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry) . 2-7
Figure 3-1. Remote-Sensing Van and Instruments in Operation 3-3
Figure 3-2. Hydrocarbon Vapor Detector 3-4
Figure 3-3. Portable SHED (PSHED) with Door Open 3-7
Figure 3-4. Procedure for Sampling, Recruitment, and Testing at Ken Caryl Station 3-9
Figure 3-5. Conditioning Route and Locations of Remote-Sensing Instruments 3-11
Figure 3-6. Study Layout at Ken Caryl Station 3-12
Figure 4-1. Model-Year Distribution for Eligible Vehicles 4-3
Figure 4-2. Model-Year Distribution for Participating Vehicles 4-3
Figure 4-3. Cumulative Unweighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED Measurements by
Model-Year Group 4-4
11
-------
Figure 4-4. Unweighted Hot-Soak (PSHED) Measurements vs. Evaporative Indices (EI23) for
Measured Vehicles in the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group 4-8
Figure 4-5. Weighted Hot-Soak (PSHED) Measurements vs. Evaporative Indices (EI23) for
Measured Vehicles in the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group 4-8
Figure 4-6. Weighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED Hot-Soak Emissions, by
Model-Year Group 4-12
Figure 4-7. Weighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED Hot-Soak Emissions for the
Sampled Fleet 4-12
Figure 4-8. Distribution of PSHED Seal Temperature for Participating Vehicles 4-16
Figure 4-9. Initial PSHED Temperature vs. Final PSHED Temperature 4-16
Figure 4-10. Selection RSD Temperature vs. Initial PSHED Temperature 4-17
Figure 4-11. Barometric Pressure at PSHED Sealing 4-17
Figure 4-12. Fuel Tank Levels for Participating Vehicles 4-18
Figure 4-13. Magnitude of PSHED Hot-soak Results by Model-Year Group and Location
of Vapor Source 4-23
in
-------
IV
-------
1.0 Executive Summary
The primary goal of the Ken Caryl project was to estimate distributions of hot-soak
emission levels for gasoline-fueled light-duty vehicles, using a quick and inexpensive procedure
to conduct a survey of an in-use fleet. Innovative strategies were used to measure evaporative
emissions data on 175 vehicles representative of the fleet entering Ken Caryl station.
The vehicle sample evaluated during the study was drawn from vehicles visiting an I/M
station in Denver during the summer months. Classes of vehicles measured included LDV,
LDT1, and LDT2 as defined by EPA regulations. A random sample of vehicles was selected for
measurement with "probability proportional to Index" (ppEI). The index was calculated from the
value of a remote-sensing measurement obtained as each vehicle entered the I/M station. The
sampling process used the index to improve the efficiency with which vehicles with "elevated"
evaporative emissions could be selected for recruitment (as opposed to sampling the fleet fully at
random). The success of the ppEI approach in identifying vehicles with elevated evaporative
emissions has confirmed earlier work demonstrating the utility of a screening index in reducing
the level of effort and cost needed to estimate the prevalence of vehicles with elevated
evaporative emissions [1].
The hot-soak emissions of participating vehicles were measured using the "portable
SHED" (PSHED) enclosure following a procedure developed to mimic the hot-soak portion of
the Federal Test Procedure as best as possible in a field setting. This approach serves as a good
surrogate for corresponding laboratory results, but did not fully meet measurement requirements
for a laboratory SHED.1 Several parameters known to affect hot-soak emissions were not
controlled but were recorded: ambient temperature, barometric pressure, fuel tank level, fuel
metering technology, evaporative emissions control technology, and the repair status of related
vehicle systems. Results show a reasonable degree of correspondence between values of the ppEI
and corresponding hot-soak measurements.
Using the measurements obtained in the PSHED, we estimated distributions of hot-soak
emissions, for the entire sampled fleet and by model-year group, assuming that the model-year
groupings act as a surrogate for important changes in fuel-system and emissions control
technology. To obtain representative results in relation to the fleet sampled, it was necessary to
develop and apply two sets of weights to represent the processes of sampling and differential
participant response by model-year group. These weights reflect the different sampling
probabilities assigned to vehicles based on their screening indices, plus different levels of
participant response by model-year group.
Nonetheless, the ppEI did not give a perfectly reliable result for this fleet of vehicles. The
presence of "false negatives" or "false positives" in the sample reduces the efficiency of the
index in guiding sampling, but does not impair the usefulness of the sample for purposes of this
report. Each vehicle was drawn into the sample at a known level of probability, ranging from 6%
for the lowest screening indices to 100% for vehicles with the highest indices. In analyzing the
sample, the probability with which each vehicle was drawn determines its weight in the analysis,
meaning the number of vehicles in the sampled fleet that it represents. Because sampling weights
"Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination," as specified in 40 CFR 86, Subpart B.
1-1
-------
are assigned for all vehicles receiving PSHED measurements, the set of PSHED measurements
can be used to estimate the prevalence of elevated emissions.
The analysis shows the value of model-year groups as a surrogate for fuel-system and
emissions-control technology. The hot-soak results among model-year groups span about three
orders of magnitude and are consistent with the combined effects of evaporative emission control
technologies and vehicle age. Older model year groups had substantially higher estimated hot-
soak values than newer model year groups. All vehicles manufactured prior to 1981 (when
measured at 29+ years of age) are expected to have PSHEDs greater than 1.0 g/Qhr (g/quarter-
hour). This rate corresponds to a cumulative leak of 0.020 inches in diameter, or the size of the
smallest fuel/evaporative control system vapor leak that OBD systems are required to detect. For
vehicles manufactured between 1981 and 1995 (measured at 14+ years of age), 26% and 39% of
vehicles are expected to exceed 1.0 and 0.30 g/Qhr, respectively (with the latter value
corresponding to the hot-soak portion of the 1996-and-later enhanced emission standard). For
vehicles manufactured between 1996 and 2003 (measured at 5-13 years of age), and employing
both OBD systems and enhanced evaporative emission control technology, corresponding
fractions are 3.3% and 6.4%, respectively. Evaluation of an assumption that all measurements
were overestimated by 50% indicated that these frequencies would be reduced by margins of
12% and 5%, respectively, giving "lower-bound" values of 2.9% and 6.1%. Finally, no vehicles
manufactured in 2004-2010 are expected to have PSHEDs greater than 0.3 g/Qhr, although these
conclusions are based on a relatively small set of 13 measured vehicles.
Despite the quick and rudimentary nature of the physical inspection, it was often possible
to isolate vapor emissions to specific components of the fuel-delivery or emission-control
systems. Specific vapor sources were identified for 44% and 17% of all PSHED results in the
pre-1996 and the 1996-2010 model-year groups, respectively. However, for the vehicles having
PSHED results >0.3 g/Qhr, the fractions are higher, with vapor sources identified for 54% and
76% of results in the pre-1996 and 1996-2010 model-year groups. Overall, 13 specific vapor
sources were isolated, with the most common being the fuel tank, fill pipe, and canister. These
three locations account for 66% of identified sources for all PSHED results. Results also show
that most identified vapor sources exceeded 0.3 g/Qhr, with 64% to 70% of sources exceeding
this threshold attributed to these three locations.
The distributions of summer hot-soak emissions estimated from the measurements
obtained at Ken Caryl station represent new data that is relevant to characterizing evaporative
emissions at the fleet level in other contexts. However, the specific limitations of the study imply
that the results cannot necessarily be generalized broadly without taking steps to account for
differences in conditions. The effects of ambient temperature, fuel volatility, and barometric
pressure (altitude), among other factors, need to be considered in generalizing the application
and interpretation of these results.
Taken together, the emission data and the mechanics' inspection results discussed in the
report suggest that the "hot soak" emissions measured in this work emanate from either canister
breakthrough or as a result of leaks in the fuel and evaporative emission control systems.
1-2
-------
2.0 Background
Evaporative emissions from motor vehicles arise from the release of low molecular-
weight hydrocarbon components from the fuel (typically gasoline). Unlike exhaust emissions,
which are emitted primarily from the tailpipe, evaporative emissions can be released from any
part of the fuel-delivery or evaporative emissions control systems. Due to the delocalized nature
of evaporative emissions, they have historically proven difficult to isolate and measure for
individual vehicles and to forecast for fleets.
Historically, four classes or types of evaporative emissions have been recognized.
"Running-loss" emissions occur while engine is operating. For vehicles with functional control
systems these emissions are captured but when these systems malfunction or fail, hydrocarbon
vapors can escape into the environment. "Hot-soak" emissions occur after the engine has been
turned off and residual heat results in fuel evaporation. For vehicles with fuel injection, hot-soak
emissions are generated primarily from the fuel tank. For older vehicles with carburetion, such
emissions are also generated from the carburetor bowl. "Permeation" losses are low-level
emissions occurring by diffusion through fuel-system materials or through junctions where
components meet, such as fittings. Finally, "diurnal" emissions occur as the vehicle heats up as
ambient temperature increases during the day. Note, however, that these emissions classes are
not mutually exclusive and that similar physical processes may be in operation in multiple
"types," i.e., with the engine on or off, etc.
In addition to vehicle characteristics, fuel characteristics influence evaporative emissions.
In general, increased fuel volatility results in increased evaporation. In addition, the fuel level in
the tank determines the volume of vapor available for release or evaporation, with the result that
evaporative emissions tend to increase when the fuel tank level is low, other factors equal.
The generalizations above apply to vehicles with properly functioning emissions control
systems. However, if the control system is malfunctioning or the integrity of the system is
compromised, resulting in leaks of various sizes, additional volumes of vapor can be lost to the
atmosphere from numerous locations.2 This phenomenon was recognized by EPA and industry
over 35 years ago and served as a major reason for requirement of the SHED test in lieu of the
older canister method [2].
It is important to note that vehicles having "elevated" running-loss or hot-soak emissions
are not necessarily "malfunctioning" or "leaking." For obvious reasons, the levels of evaporative
emissions expected depend heavily on the technology of the fuel-delivery and evaporative
emission-control systems at the time of manufacture. Before 1971, light-duty gasoline vehicles
had no regulations on evaporative emissions. For those vehicles, fuel tanks were typically vented
directly to the atmosphere. In the years since 1970, certification test procedures and standards
have become increasingly comprehensive and stringent. However, running-losses were not
directly addressed until the introduction of "enhanced" evaporative emissions control
requirements for model-year 1996-and-later gasoline-powered light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and
light-duty trucks (LDTs). On the other hand, the existence of a leak in the fuel or vapor control
2 Leaks in the fuel/vapor control system can result from poor design approaches, poor connections, component
deterioration as a result of poor material selection or mis-assembly of components and systems.
2-1
-------
system would likely result in substantially increased vapor emissions, regardless of the
technology employed or level of emissions control required.
For purposes of emissions inventory estimation, the MOBILE models classified
evaporative emissions as described above. In development of the Motor Vehicle Emissions
Simulator (MOVES), however, the terms "hot-soak" "cold-soak" and "operation" are defined as
"operating modes." During these modes, emissions may be generated by one or more "processes,"
defined as "vapor venting" (primarily from the tank), "permeation," or "leaks" (vapor or liquid).
2.1 Laboratory Measurement of Evaporative Emissions
Because evaporative emissions can emanate from many locations on a vehicle, the
measurement of a vehicle's evaporative emissions is different and in some ways more difficult
than the measurement of exhaust emissions. Placing vehicles in a sealed enclosure, such as the
"Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination" (SHED) makes it possible to quantify total
vapors emitted during various test conditions. However, because evaporative emissions vary
with physical process and operating mode during constantly changing ambient conditions, the
dependence of evaporative emissions on environmental factors such as ambient temperature, fuel
volatility, atmospheric pressure, and driving history is complex.
To explore the relationships between evaporative emissions and the vehicles' operating
environment, modeling is one useful approach. Between 1987 and 1992, the Coordinating
Research Council sponsored work to use available data to develop a model to estimate fleet-
average evaporative emissions in relation to changing environmental conditions [3, 4, 5]. The
resulting model (EVAP 3.0) estimated hot-soak and diurnal (but not running-loss) emissions at
the fleet scale [3]. This model did not estimate fractions of vehicles having elevated evaporative
emissions as a result of leaks. However, this model and others like it served to guide additional
research by clarifying the importance of different physical processes or modes in various
situations.
More recently, additional work sponsored by the Coordinating Research Council (CRC),
in cooperation with EPA and the Department of Energy, has focused on specific questions
concerning the processes by which evaporation emissions occur [6]. One set of studies, focused
on permeation, first developed a test procedure and then applied it in a larger program to
estimate emissions from vehicles with differing control technologies, e.g., "pre-enhanced" (pre
1996), "enhanced" (MY 1996-2000), and "partial-zero emissions vehicles" (PZEV)3. In the E-77
pilot program, one vehicle was measured with and without an artificially-induced leak of the
minimum diameter necessary to set an OBD code. Results showed that the presence of a leak can
increase emissions by several orders of magnitude and underscored the importance of estimating
the prevalence of leaks in the in-use fleet. While evaporative mass emissions have been
quantified in previous studies [7, 8, 9], frequencies of leaking vehicles in the in-use fleet have
been estimated based on very limited data [8, 9, 10].
Follow-up efforts with artificially-induced "implanted" leaks of similar diameters at
differing locations (such as the gas cap) showed that the magnitude of emissions is associated
! PZEVs, 2004 and later vehicles, an option for compliance under the California ZEV mandate.
2-2
-------
with the locations of leaks [6]. One finding was that systems equipped with on-board refueling
vapor recovery (ORVR) can mitigate the effects of leaks in some locations, depending on the
ORVR design employed. However, leaks at specific locations, such as the top of the tank or in
connection to the canister, were found to result in higher emissions.
2.2 The Denver Inspection and Maintenance Program
As in a number of urban areas throughout the U.S., vehicles registered with addresses in
the Denver Metropolitan Area are subject to the requirements of an Inspect!on-and-Maintenance
Program (I/M). The Colorado Automobile Inspection and Readjustment program is an enhanced
I/M program with the goal of detecting and repairing high-emitting gasoline vehicles4. The
program covers nine counties and portions of counties in and around Denver. The program is
registration-enforced and applies to all heavy- and light-duty gasoline-powered vehicles with the
exception of vehicles less than 4 years old, which are exempt. Vehicle owners moving into the
area must have their vehicles inspected prior to registration unless they are less than three years
old. Other exempt vehicles are those older than model year 1975 with collector license plates,
motorcycles, and hybrid and other alternatively-powered vehicles. Vehicles not exempt from the
program are due for inspection every two years and when they change ownership.
The program emphasizes testing of exhaust emissions. Vehicles manufactured since 1982
undergo testing of transient emissions on the EVI240 cycle performed on chassis dynamometers.
Vehicles manufactured prior to 1982 are measured using a two-speed idle test. A scan of the on-
board diagnostic (OBD) system is performed for vehicles manufactured since 1996 but is used
for advisory purposes only, not for determining test results. The only program requirement
specific to evaporative emissions is a test of gas-cap integrity. This test is performed for all
vehicles manufactured since 1975.
In addition to these requirements, the program includes collection of remote-sensing
measurements throughout the area on an ongoing basis. Vehicles receiving two such
measurements rated as "clean" are exempted from their next routine I/M test. This "clean-screen"
component reduces the demand on the I/M stations and saves time and money for the motorists.
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has an interest in
improving the methods available to identify vehicles with elevated evaporative emissions. Since
2006, CDPHE and the Regional Air Quality Council (RAQC) have collaborated in a program to
identify vehicles needing repairs to reduce their hydrocarbon emissions, using remote sensing as
a screening tool. An unexpected result of the effort was the apparent ability of the RSD4000
instrument to detect and identify vehicles with "elevated" evaporative emissions. Several such
vehicles were found to pass EVI240 final exhaust cutpoints but to have vapor or liquid leaks.
Concurrently, EPA was engaged in development of the evaporative emissions
components of the MOVES model, which involved updating the estimates of "leak frequencies"
previously used in MOBILE6.
4 The program is run by Envirotest Systems Corp., a subsidiary of Environmental Systems Products, Inc. (ESP),
under contract to the State of Colorado.
2-3
-------
As a result of these mutual interests, CDPHE and EPA entered into a Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) to study evaporative emissions by developing
measurement and screening procedures and applying them to assess evaporative emissions in the
in-use fleet. Collaborative efforts under this agreement were pursued in Denver to capitalize on
work already underway and to take advantage of research facilities and staff made available by
CDPHE and ESP. In addition, existing contract relationships between CDPHE and ESP and
between EPA and ERG facilitated the timely and cost-effective completion of this work,
including the current proj ect.
2.3 Measurement of Evaporative Emissions by Remote-Sensing
Remote sensing is a technique capable of obtaining a brief measurement of emissions
from vehicles during normal operation, without the need to bring vehicles into the laboratory for
more intensive or costly measurements. The instrument projects beams of infrared and ultraviolet
light across a roadway at approximately the height of the tailpipe. When vehicles drive past the
instrument and the beams pass through the emissions plume, the presence and concentration of
exhaust gases (relative to that of CC^) is detected by attenuation of light energy by specific
chemical species in the plume [11]. The technique typically detects carbon monoxide (CO),
nitrogen oxides (as NO) and hydrocarbons (as propane or hexane equivalents).
Since the late 1980's this technique has been used to measure emissions for large and
broad samples of vehicles from in-use fleets [12, 13]. Because of this capability, remote-sensing
has been favored as a method to identify "high emitters" of exhaust pollutants. This project is the
largest effort to date to investigate the use of remote sensing to screen for "high emitters" of
evaporative emissions.
When the emission plume of a vehicle is measured by remote sensing, the vehicle is in
the "operating" mode. Thus, evaporative emissions occurring at that time would be broadly
classified as "running-loss." Nevertheless, these emissions can occur through one or more of the
processes described above (e.g., permeation, vapor venting, hot soak, etc). Generally, if leaks
exist in the fuel or control systems, it is plausible that they would be evident during either
"running-loss" or "hot-soak" conditions, depending on their location and size.
In 2006 and 2007, personnel at CDPHE found evidence suggesting that remote-sensing
instruments could detect evaporative emissions and identify vehicles with "elevated" emissions.
A simple, semi-quantitative follow-up experiment used an RSD4000 instrument with metered
amounts of propane, unmetered amounts of liquid gasoline, and known concentrations of
simulated exhaust from an "audit" truck. These results seemed to corroborate the claim that the
remote-sensing instrument could identify vapor and liquid leaks. Results obtained from the audit
truck showed that measurements for two "leak" conditions, "gas-cap removed" and "canister
disconnected," were approximately two and seven times higher than those for a "no problem"
condition.
2.3.1 Development of Evaporative Screening Indices
Additional experimentation was needed to explore the possibility that a remote-sensing
instrument could detect and potentially quantify evaporative emissions. An audit truck and
2-4
-------
several test vehicles were equipped to emit simulated running-losses, as well as simulated or
actual exhaust emissions. Several thousand measurements were acquired [14] from these
vehicles under various test conditions including emissions type (propane, gasoline), point of
release, release rate, vehicle speed, exhaust emissions level, and leak type. The raw spectroscopic
data obtained by the instrument from those measurements was analyzed to show that a remote-
sensing instrument that is used to measure exhaust emissions could detect "running-losses" but
that the sensitivity of the approach was affected by vehicle speed, exhaust emissions
concentration, point of release, and sources of random error. Overall, results indicated that a
quick and inexpensive estimate of evaporative emissions, or evaporative emissions "index,"
could be developed using some function of the instrument-internal spectroscopic data.
For the purposes of sampling, an "index" need not provide a precise measurement of
emissions; it is only necessary that an index show a reasonable degree of correlation with
evaporative emissions (as measured by more intensive methods). Subsequent efforts have
explored various approaches to use remote-sensing measurements to characterize evaporative
emissions [1, 14] and to develop and evaluate additional measures that could serve as indices.
Latter efforts have focused on patterns in hydrocarbon attenuation relative to those for CO2,
which is produced only by combustion.
The remote-sensing technique assumes that exhaust gases exiting the tailpipe are well
mixed and disperse into ambient air at the same rate. The instrument operates by measuring the
attenuation of a beam of infrared or ultraviolet light by chemical species in the emissions plume
(CC>2, CO, NO, HC). For each vehicle passing the sensor, 50 attenuation measurements are
captured at intervals of 10 msec. If only exhaust emissions are present, and if background
concentrations are negligible, the degree of attenuation for the several species measured remains
roughly constant, even as the plume disperses and concentrations decline. Using an example
from experimental work described above, Figure 2-1 shows time series for measurement of a
plume containing only exhaust emissions. Despite differences in scaling, the four species follow
similar relative trends over the time interval.
If these assumptions hold, plots of attenuation measurements for each species (ppm-cm)
against attenuation of CO2 (%-cm) should show a linear relationship with a low degree of
variation around the trend and with trends passing through the origin. Experimental results show
this to be the case, as shown in Figure 2-2.
Several proposed screening indices considered have relied on the assumption that when
evaporative hydrocarbons as well as exhaust hydrocarbons are present in the exhaust plume, the
time series for HC attenuation will differ from those for CO and NO. An implication of this
result is that the trend of HC attenuation vs. CO2 attenuation will show a "high" degree of scatter,
as assessed by examination of residuals of a simple least-square fit of HC vs. CO2 attenuation.
Experimental results displaying this pattern are shown in Figure 2-3. Development of indices
through analyses of the behavior of residuals from the regression of HC on CO2 attenuation is
further discussed in Appendix A.
2-5
-------
Figure 2-1. Attenuation Time Series for an Experimental Condition Simulating
Zero Evaporative Emissions (0.00 scfh propane) and Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
I
ro
J5
"o
0.
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
HC(ppm-cm)/ 100
- • CO (%-cm)
- - C02 (%-cm)
NOx (ppm-crn)/ 100
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Time (msec)
Figure 2-2. Attenuation Measurements for Three Pollutants vs. CO2 Attenuation:
Zero Evaporative Emissions (0.00 scfh propane)
and Simulated Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
40
35
30
I 25
CD
2 20
I 15
o
0.
10
5
0
+ HC(ppm-cm)/100
+ CO (%-cm)
NOx (ppm-cm)/ 100
10 15 20 25 30
CO2 Attenuation ((%-cm)
35
40
2-6
-------
Figure 2-3. Attenuation Measurements for Three Pollutants vs. CO2 Attenuation:
Simultaneous Simulated Evaporative Emissions (15 scfh propane)
and Simulated Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
c
o
"CD
1
-t-i
1
o
CL
100
00
o
O5
o
-N
o
K>
o
K>
o
-H-
-
-t-
HC(ppm-cm)/100
CO (%-cm)
NOx (ppm-cm) / 100
10 20 30 40
CO2 Attenuation ((%-cm)
50
60
2.3.2 A Screening Index for Evaporative Emissions
The evaporative index applied in the current study is based on examination of residuals
from a linear fit of HC attenuation against CC>2 attenuation. As the twenty-third candidate index
based on this principle, we refer to it as "EI23." The largest residual is not used as it is
considered more susceptible to random error. The mean of all residuals is not used as it is more
susceptible to contamination from exhaust hydrocarbons in the plume.
Evaluation of the performance of EI23 using experimental results showed that the index
can detect high running-loss rates, but that its effectiveness as a predictive tool is affected by
vehicle speed, exhaust hydrocarbon concentration, and other sources of variability inherent in
remote-sensing measurements. Generally, the effectiveness of the index as a predictive tool
declines: (1) with increasing vehicle speed, which tends to reduce all residuals, and (2) with
increasing exhaust emissions, which can confound the evaporative component in the plume.
Random error or "noise" also tends to confound the index as the index itself is premised on the
assumption that the presence of evaporative hydrocarbons manifests as increased "error" in the
attenuation trend. Pilot work has demonstrated that indices are more effective at detecting
evaporative vapors when the vehicles' speeds are "low" when passing the instrument. For this
reason, every attempt was made to limit the speed of vehicles to about 12 mph when passing the
instrument during collection of data intended for use in calculating EI23.
The index is calculated in a series of steps. For each set of raw spectroscopic
measurements, the first four measurements and any invalid measurements are deleted. An
2-7
-------
ordinary least-squares regression of HC attenuation vs. CC>2 attenuation is performed on the
remaining observations, and residuals are calculated for all measurements used in the linear fit.
Note that this regression is fit so as to allow non-zero intercepts. The number of residuals n is
divided by 10 and the result rounded to the nearest integer, designated as X. After sorting the
absolute residuals by size from smallest to largest (retaining negative values), theXth largest
residual, which represents an approximation of the 90th percentile residual, is taken as the value
ofEI23.
To address the effects of uncertainty in the index values introduced by vehicle speed and
other factors additional steps are taken. The initial value of EI23 is transformed into logarithmic
space, and a calculation made to account for the exhaust component in the plume. The result is
assigned to one of seven classes in which class 1 and class 7 represent the lowest and highest
levels of evaporative emissions, respectively. The transformed and classified values of EI23 were
used as a screening index for this project and will be referred to as "EI23 Bin." A detailed
description of the calculation of EI23 and EI23 Bin is provided in Appendix A.
2.3.3 Unequal Probability Sampling Using an Evaporative Index
Prior to the exploratory work initiated in Denver in 2008 [1], estimates of the fraction of
"leaking" vehicles in the light-duty fleet (which would be expected to have elevated evaporative
emissions) were on the order of 1/100 for the overall fleet, and lower for recently manufactured
vehicles. If this estimate was correct, samples of vehicles drawn fully at random from the in-use
fleet would need to be prohibitively large to access adequate samples of vehicles with
evaporative "leaks." For example, if the prevalence of "leaks" in a target fleet were 1% and
assuming an owner response rate of 33% could be obtained, it would be necessary to solicit
participation for 3,000 vehicles and to measure 1,000 vehicles to acquire a sample of 10 vehicles
with evaporative "leaks."
In this situation, in which the majority of vehicles are "clean" or "properly functioning"
and the incidence of "leaks" is relatively rare, sampling with unequal probabilities based on a
screening measure for evaporative emissions could greatly improve the efficiency with which
vehicles with "elevated" emissions could be identified for measurement. As described above,
initial testing has demonstrated that a measure such as EI23 Bin, while not perfect, is associated
with the probability that a vehicle has elevated evaporative emissions. In particular, EI23 Bin,
which attempts to reduce EI23's dependence on exhaust HC concentration, can be used as a
screening measure that can increase the likelihood that a sampled vehicle actually has high
evaporative emissions. Accordingly, EI23 Bin was used to screen vehicles for purpose of
sampling in this project, as described in the next section.
2.4 Glossary of Terms
As-received condition - The fuel type, fuel tank level, and repair condition of a test vehicle
when it is recruited from the fleet.
Audit truck - See RSD audit truck.
Background concentration - The concentration of a gas in the ambient air around a test vehicle.
2-8
-------
Bench-purge - The process of back flushing the evaporative emissions control canister to
remove adsorbed hydrocarbons by pulling ambient air through the canister using laboratory
equipment rather than the vehicle's emission control components.
Bias - A systemic offset in measured vs. true values, caused by the experimental process.
CDPHE - Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
Canister - The device in an evaporative emissions control system that captures and stores
evaporative emissions generated within the vehicle for later combustion by the engine. The
canister typically contains activated carbon as an adsorbent.
Catalytic converter - A device located in a vehicle's exhaust system that reduces the
concentrations of combustion pollutants (usually HC, CO, and NOx emissions for gasoline-
fueled vehicles) through chemical reactions on the surface of a catalytic material.
Certification - The regulatory process by which newly developed prototype vehicles are tested
for compliance with emissions regulations.
Chassis dynamometer - A laboratory apparatus that a vehicle can be operated on without the
vehicle actually moving.
Clean-screening - A procedure or measurement that uses RSD or some other technique to select
vehicles not likely to have elevated emissions.
absorbance - The amount of light absorbed by the CC>2 in a particular volume of gas, and
therefore does not pass through for detection.
Combustion stoichiometry - The ratios of reactants (e.g. fuel and air) and products (exhaust
constituents) present in a combustion reaction.
CRC - Coordinating Research Council, an organization that sponsors research and
communications for the automobile and oil industries.
Data packets - Templates used by project staff to both guide the test procedure and serve as a
place to record relevant vehicle and test data.
Demographics - Statistical data concerning a population or subgroups of that population.
Detection limit - The lowest concentration of a substance that can be distinguished from an
absence of that substance by an analytical process with some level of statistical confidence,
generally 99%.
Diurnal - A daily process or event; in evaporative emissions it is a gradual warming and cooling
of a vehicle fuel that simulates being parked outside during the daytime.
2-9
-------
Diurnal heat builds - During evaporative emissions measurement, the artificial warming of an
enclosure containing a test vehicle to simulate ambient diurnals.
Dynamometer - A device that allows a test vehicle to be driven over a variety of road loads and
speeds while remaining stationary in a laboratory.
EI23 - The 23rd running-loss index created under ERG's RSD evaporative emissions study,
calculated based on a regression of the HC vs. CC>2 concentration*pathlengths captured during an
RSM.
EI23 Bin - A transformation of EI23 values that was created to reduce the dependence of EI23
measurements on vehicle speed and exhaust hydrocarbon concentration.
Enhanced - The emissions certification standards for light-duty gasoline vehicles that were
phased in during the 1996-1998 model years, were fully in place for the 1999-2003 model years,
and were phased out during the 2004-2006 model years.
Enhanced I/M program - A type of Inspection and Maintenance program that meets the EPA
designation of "enhanced" according to the Clean Air Act of 1990, including requirements for
annual vehicle testing, dynamometer loading of test vehicles, and/or On-Board Diagnostic
(OBD) testing.
EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ERG - Eastern Research Group, Inc.
ESP - Environmental Systems Products, Inc.
Evaporative emission control system - The group of devices and design properties of a vehicle
that serve to prevent fuel vapors from escaping into the atmosphere.
Evaporative emissions - Unburned fuel that escapes into the atmosphere from a vehicle and
does not get burned in the engine.
Evaporative emissions (Evap) index - A mathematical method for a measurement of
evaporative emissions based on raw values collected during an RSD measurement.
Evaporative emissions mode - The operational condition of a vehicle in which evaporative
emissions are released, either during operation (engine running), hot-soaking (engine recently
turned off and still warm), or cold-soaking (engine off and at ambient temperature).
Evaporative emissions process - The method by which evaporative emissions are released from
a vehicle into the atmosphere, either by direct vapor venting, permeation of components, or
liquid fuel leaks.
2-10
-------
Exhaust emissions - Emissions that are released primarily from a vehicle's tailpipe.
Federal Test Procedure (FTP) - The process that must be followed to test a vehicle for exhaust
and evaporative emissions in order to receive EPA certification for the sale of new vehicles.
FTP-specification - A test, laboratory configuration, or method that satisfies all of the
requirements of the FTP, as given in Part 86 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
FTP-75 - The primary transient chassis dynamometer test cycle given in the FTP; a speed vs.
time trace that is driven on a dynamometer for the measurement of vehicle emissions that
simulates the vehicle traveling about 11 miles at approximately 21 mph.
Fuel-delivery system - The group of components of a vehicle that are designed to store fuel and
transport it to the engine for combustion.
g/Qhr - grams per quarter hour, grams per 15 minutes.
Gross liquid leakers - Vehicles that have extremely high evaporative emissions rates due to
liquid leaks from their fuel systems.
HC - Hydrocarbon.
HC time trace - The 50 raw measurements of HC concentration*pathlength, taken periodically
over the 0.5 s duration of an RSM.
HLDT - Heavy light-duty truck; a truck with a gross vehicle weight between 6,000 and 8,500
Ibs.
Hot-soak - The condition in which a vehicle's engine has recently been switched off but still has
an elevated temperature compared to ambient conditions.
I/M - Inspection/Maintenance. A program that attempts to reduce or maintain low emissions for
vehicles in the fleet by identifying vehicles that have emissions higher than they were designed
to emit and forcing them to be repaired.
I/M lane - A lane within an I/M station that is equipped with emissions-inspecting and/or safety-
inspecting personnel and equipment.
I/M station - A facility with emissions and/or safety inspection personnel and equipment that is
part of an I/M program.
IM240 - A specific 240 second transient chassis dynamometer driving schedule used to operate
a vehicle for consistent testing of vehicle exhaust emissions.
Implanted leak - a liquid or vapor leak deliberately made to a test vehicle's fuel metering or
emission control systems for research purposes.
2-11
-------
IR - Infra-red electromagnetic radiation.
LDGV - Light-duty gasoline vehicle.
LDT1 - Light-duty truck, category 1; a truck with less than 6000 Ibs. gross vehicle weight and
less than 3750 Ibs. loaded vehicle weight.
LDT2 - Light-duty truck, category 2; a truck with less than 6000 Ibs. gross vehicle weight and
between 3750 and 5750 Ibs. loaded vehicle weight.
Light-duty vehicle - A passenger car or passenger car derivative capable of seating 12
passengers or less.
MCM - Modified California Method; a method of inspecting the fuel handling system and
evaporative emissions control system of a vehicle using visual, olfactory (smelling), and
electronic HC detector.
MOVES - Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator; the most recent model used by EPA for the
estimation of pollutant emissions from the national fleet of in-use vehicles.
NO - Nitric oxide; a combustion pollutant that typically makes up the majority of nitrogen
oxides in gasoline vehicle exhaust and oxidizes to NC>2 in the atmosphere.
Noise - Random variability that is introduced to the measured value from any of a variety of
sources. In general, noise degrades the detection limit of an analytical system.
NOi - Nitrogen dioxide; a toxic gas and a combustion pollutant that typically makes up a small
part of nitrogen oxides in gasoline vehicle exhaust.
NOX - Nitrogen oxides; in exhaust, the sum of NO, NO2 , and other lower-concentration
nitrogen/oxygen compounds.
Olfactory inspection -The process of searching for evaporative emissions based on smell.
OBD - On-board diagnostics; an automotive system with the ability to continually track the
functionality of emissions control and other components and alert the driver or vehicle inspector
when a problem is found.
ORVR - On-board refueling vapor recovery; an evaporative emissions control system that
captures fuel vapors that are displaced during vehicle refueling; also a test procedure in the FTP
that measures the system's effectiveness.
Offgassing / offgassed - The emissions of hydrocarbons from non-fuel related and solid sources
such as plastics and rubber.
2-12
-------
Oxygenates - Fuel additives that contain oxygen, such as alcohols and ethers, which reduce CO
formation during combustion.
Pathlength - The linear distance through a medium that a light beam must travel; in this study,
the distance between the emitter and detector units of the RSD which was effectively twice the
distance across the vehicle measurement lane.
Permeation - The seeping of hydrocarbon through its containment vessel, either fuel hose, tank,
or other solid fuel system component; one of the evaporative emissions processes.
Precision - A quantification of the repeatability or reproducibility of a particular measurement
process.
Pre-enhanced - The emissions certification standards for light-duty gasoline vehicles that were
in force before the enhanced standards. Pre-enhanced standards were fully in place for the 1981-
1995 model years, and were phased out during the 1996-1998 model years.
PSHED - A portable SHED. A portable version of the SHED developed for low cost and field
deployment.
RSD - Remote Sensing Device. Instrumentation that uses a light beam shining across the road to
measure the near-instantaneous emissions of the vehicle as it drives past the instrument.
RSD attenuation data - The time series of measured light concentration*pathlength values of
HC, CO, NO, and CO2 in the vehicle plume measured each 10ms over the 0.5 second duration of
an RSM.
RSD audit truck - A truck used to test RSD instruments by presenting them with synthetic
exhaust emissions with known concentrations. These exhaust emissions are commonly produced
by the release of dry bottled gas through a simulated tailpipe while the real engine exhaust is
routed through a real tailpipe high over the cab so that they do not enter the RSD light beam.
RSM - remote-sensing measurement.
Running-loss - Evaporative emissions that occur while a vehicle is operating.
RVP - Reid vapor pressure; a measure of the volatility of gasoline at 100°F.
SAS - Statistical Analysis System.
scfh - Standard cubic feet per hour. A unit for volumetric gas flow at standard temperature and
pressure.
Seal barometric pressure - The ambient barometric pressure at the time that the PSHED door
was closed and sealed with the test vehicle inside the PSHED.
2-13
-------
Seal temperature - The temperature of the air inside the PSHED at the time that the PSHED
door was closed and sealed with the test vehicle inside the PSHED.
SHED - Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination. A special enclosure used to measure
evaporative emissions of a vehicle by placing the vehicle in the enclosure and measuring the
concentration of emissions building up in the enclosure's air.
"Sniffer" - An electronic device for detecting HC vapor; used in the MCM procedure.
Spitback - The quantity of liquid fuel that is ejected during filling as the tank approaches full
capacity; a procedure in the FTP that measures for this quantity at a certain specified fill rate.
Tier 2 - The set of vehicle emissions standards and test practices mandated by EPA that was
phased in during 2004-2006 model years and was fully in effect beginning in 2007.
Two-speed-idle test - An exhaust emissions concentration test, typically performed by enhanced
I/M stations on vehicles that cannot be tested on a chassis dynamometer, that involves measuring
HC and CO emissions at low and medium engine speeds with the vehicle stationary and in
neutral.
Unequal probability sampling - A type of selection in which individuals from a population do
not all have the same likelihood of selection.
UV - Ultra-violet electromagnetic radiation.
VDF - The unique serial number given to each RSM by a particular RSD unit, usually reset to 1
at the beginning of each test day.
Vehicle Emissions Control Information (VECI) Label - An under-hood placard containing a
summary of the emissions standards that the vehicle meets, along with its engine and evaporative
emissions control system family codes.
VECI engine family - The engine family as shown on the VECI label.
VECI evap family - The evaporative emissions control system family as shown on the VECI
label.
VECI model year - The model year of the emissions control standards that the engine was
certified to as shown on the VECI label.
Vehicle specific power (VSP) - A quantification of the power output of a vehicle divided by its
weight in order to compare engine output levels among different types of vehicles; usually
expressed in units of kW/Mg.
2-14
-------
Vehicle conditioning - The process of operating a vehicle over a known and repeatable cycle
with the intent of ensuring that each test vehicle has similar levels of evaporative canister loading
as well as stabilized engine temperatures.
VIN - For 1981 and newer vehicles a 17-digit alpha-numeric string that contains encoded
information about the make, model, model year, engine, manufacturer and other vehicle
information. VINs are unique to individual vehicles. Before 1981 VINs did not have a
standardized format among all manufacturers.
VIN stem - The first through ninth plus eleventh characters of a 1981 or newer VIN. The VIN
stem is not unique to an individual vehicle but does contain the encoded information about make,
model, model year, engine, manufacturer, and other vehicle information.
Visual inspection - The process of a technician looking at vehicle components for presence or
damage; I/M inspections include a visual inspection for the presence of a catalytic converter, and
the MCM includes visual inspection for liquid leaks or fuel stains.
2-15
-------
2-16
-------
3.0 Methods
3.1 Project Goals
The substantive goal of the project is to estimate the cumulative distributions of
evaporative emissions in the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck fleets. For a given definition
of "elevated" emissions, defined as hot-soak emissions for this project, the distributions indicate
the frequencies of vehicles expected to meet these emission characteristics. These distributions
are to be estimated for a set of model-year groups representing important combinations of fuel-
delivery systems technology and evaporative emissions standards.
In conducting this work, there were two methodological goals. One methodological goal
was to apply cost-effective and efficient methods of measuring evaporative emissions. A second
methodological goal was to apply a screening method to improve the efficiency of identifying
and sampling vehicles with "elevated" evaporative emissions.
3.1.1 Key Variables
For purposes of the project, the term "evaporative emissions" denotes the mass of
hydrocarbons measured during a specified period of time during which the engine is hot after
operation but is not running, i.e., "hot-soak" emissions. Additionally, "elevated" emissions are
defined as emissions exceeding a specified rate for the measurement technique used. However,
as will be discussed, the frequency of "elevated" emissions depends on the threshold or
thresholds used, i.e., frequencies increase as the threshold decreases. For this project, emissions
were measured as the mass of hydrocarbon vapor measured during a 15-minute hot-soak in an
enclosed space (g/Qhr).
3.1.2 Target Population and Sampled Fleet
The population of vehicles targeted by the study includes gasoline-fueled light-duty
vehicles (LDV) and light-duty trucks (LDT)s manufactured between 1960 and 2010 and
operating in the Denver metropolitan area. Vehicle classes considered eligible for measurement
included LDV, LDT1, and LDT2, due to size limitations in the measurement enclosure.
The pool of vehicles available for sampling and measurement includes privately-owned
vehicles entering the Ken Caryl Station to undergo maintenance inspections for purposes of
vehicle registration during the months of July-September, 2009.5
Note that the pool of vehicles entering the station does not include vehicles exempted
from inspection through the City's "clean-screen" program. On an ongoing basis, remote-sensing
measurements are conducted on vehicles traveling throughout the city. A vehicle receiving two
or more measurements rated as "clean" is exempted from its next emissions inspection. It is
estimated that 30-40% of vehicles are exempted from inspection through the clean-screen
program.
' Measurements were conducted between June 29 and September 4, 2009.
3-1
-------
3.2 Screening, Sampling, and Recruitment
3.2.1 Sampling
As vehicles entered the I/M station, they were sampled with "probability proportional to
evaporative index" (ppEI). The index used was "EI23 Bin." When vehicles entered the station,
they passed a remote-sensing instrument operating in the driveway. A sign instructed drivers to
come to a stop about 40 feet before the remote-sensing unit and then to accelerate past the van.
As each vehicle passed, instrumentation measured its emissions, speed, and acceleration. After
passing the instruments, each vehicle joined a queue of vehicles awaiting their inspections or
parking in the station parking area to the northwest of the driveway.
After obtaining a measurement for each vehicle, an algorithm immediately assigned each
vehicle to an EI23 Bin. Vehicles assigned to the lowest and highest Bins (Bin 1 and Bin 7,
respectively) are expected to have the lowest and highest probabilities of having elevated
evaporative emissions.
Concurrently, a random number generator in the remote-sensing software determined
whether each vehicle was drawn into the sample. Each EI23 Bin was assigned a specific
sampling fraction, with the lowest bins sampled at low rates and the highest three bins sampled
"with certainty." The sampling fractions for the index bins are shown in Table 3-1. Since each
vehicle was drawn into a bin with a known sampling fraction, the fractions can be used during
analysis to relate the results to the fleet from which they were drawn.
In addition, as a standard step in remote-sensing, an estimate of vehicle-specific power
(VSP) was calculated for each vehicle using its speed and acceleration. The VSP value
represents the tractive power exerted by the vehicle against the road surface at the time of
measurement, normalized by the vehicle's weight. A mild acceleration as vehicles pass the
sensor is considered the optimal condition for acquiring remote-sensing measurements,
interpreted as a VSP range of 5-30 kW/Mg. If this criterion was met, the vehicle was targeted for
recruitment if it was also drawn into the sample. Vehicles with VSP values outside this range
were not recruited, even if they were "sample hits," as their values of the index were not
considered reliable.
Table 3-1. Sampling Fractions by EI23 Bin
EI23 Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sampling Fraction
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.30
1.0
1.0
1.0
Figure 3-1 shows a typical remote-sensing unit set-up - although this photograph was
taken at Lipan Street I/M station. The photograph shows the remote-sensing van, the
source/detector module and retro-reflector on the left and right sides of the driveway. The
3-2
-------
speed/acceleration measurement components are located about six feet up-traffic from the
remote-sensing unit. A video camera is located about 30 feet to the rear of the van to obtain
digital photographs of the vehicle and license plate images from the rear. Traffic cones direct
control the flow and speed of vehicles as they drive through the RSD measuring area. These
components were set up similarly at Ken Caryl station.
Figure 3-1. Remote-Sensing Van and Instruments in Operation
3.2.2 Recruitment
If a vehicle was targeted, a recruiter visited with the driver and briefly described the
nature of the project as well as rental car availability and the cash incentive. At this time, the
recruiter also completed the first page of the data packet (see page C-l of Appendix C), taking
down information including the vehicle make, model, color, and license plates. During this
meeting with the driver, the recruiter determined whether the vehicle was eligible to participate
in the study (see page C-2 of Appendix C). The primary reason why vehicles were considered
ineligible was that they were too large to fit into the measurement enclosure. If the vehicle was
found to be eligible, the recruiter then asked the driver to participate. If the vehicle was ineligible
or if the driver chose not to participate, the meeting was concluded and the vehicle released.
If the driver agreed to participate in the study, the recruiter completed the driver
questionnaire with the participant (see page C-3 of Appendix C) while the vehicle concurrently
went through the I/M lane for its inspection. If the driver had come to the I/M station for
business other than an inspection, the vehicle was still eligible as the occurrence of the inspection
was incidental to this project. The recruiter then issued a rental car to the participant, if desired,
and estimated the time when testing would be complete to allow the participant to plan
accordingly (see page C-4 of Appendix C).
3-3
-------
3.3 Vehicle Inspection (The "Modified California Method")
Following sampling and recruitment, the fuel-delivery and evaporative-control systems of
each vehicle were inspected. This type of investigation consisted of a visual and olfactory
inspection of each vehicle, supplemented by the use of a handheld instrument capable of
detecting hydrocarbon vapors, i.e., a "sniffer." A staff member inspected the gas cap and fuel
filler, the fuel tank and lines under the vehicle, engine components under the hood, and the
evaporative emissions control system, including canister, vapor lines, and any other accessible
component. A portion of the inspection was conducted with the engine running and the
remainder with the engine off. Inspectors recorded any observations concerning detection of
vapors or liquid fuel, whether detected visually, by smell or by the detector (see page C-6 of
Appendix C). This procedure, known as the "Modified California Method" (MCM)6, was
performed to enable follow-up investigation of measurements obtained from the sample of
recruited vehicles.
The device used was the Combustible Gas Detector (Snap-On Tools, Stock# ACT790),
shown in Figure 3-2. The unit can be used to detect the presence of hydrocarbon vapors in the
immediate vicinity of the probe. Detectable compounds include acetylene, methane, ethane,
propane, isobutene, hydrogen, acetone, methanol, and gasoline. The battery-operated unit uses a
solid electrolyte to detect hydrocarbons with a propane sensitivity of < 10 ppm, although the
detection is mostly qualitative, not quantitative (i.e., three levels of sensitivity are reported).
Figure 3-2. Hydrocarbon Vapor Detector
6 The "Original California Method" included only visual and olfactory inspections; the method is considered
"modified" primarily due to inclusion of the hydrocarbon detector.
3-4
-------
The MCM Inspection consisted of the following steps:
With engine warmed up and running:
• Inspect the seal of the gas cap to the filler neck flange.
• Inspect underbody fuel delivery and return lines.
• Inspect bottom of fuel pump.
• Inspect pressure line from fuel pump to fuel metering assembly.
• Inspect in-line fuel filter (if so equipped).
• Inspect fuel inlet to carburetor or fuel rail.
• Inspect fuel rail and fuel rail connectors (if so equipped).
• Inspect individual fuel injectors (if so equipped).
• Check floor under vehicle for any sign of fuel accumulation.
With the engine turned off:
• Check fuel fill pipe, particularly around joint to tank.
• Check bottom of tank, particularly around rust spots, mounting straps, and any
spots showing road damage.
• Check any non-OEM installations (particularly second fuel tank add-ons) that
merit close inspection.
During and after the inspection, the inspector noted the components that appeared to be
sources of hydrocarbon vapors, classifying each in terms of its relative severity. Also, the
inspector noted whether detected sources involved loss of fuel vapor or liquid fuel, and if
possible, whether the mechanism of loss involved expulsion or permeation. Because the MCM
was conducted in two steps with the engine running and then turned off, the inspection was
intended to find sources of both running-loss and hot-soak emissions. As the MCM inspection
took place in the open I/M station it was subject to the ambient conditions of the outdoor air. Due
to its nature, and lack of access to components and connections in very confined or inaccessible
areas, the inspection could not identify or isolate every source of hydrocarbon vapors.
3.4 Measuring Hot-Soak Emissions (portable SHED)
In the laboratory, a facility designed for measurement of evaporative emissions is
designated as a "Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination" (SHED). The enclosure allows
for measurement of hydrocarbon emissions from a stationary vehicle. During measurement, the
engine may be running or off, and hot or cold (hot-soak or cold-soak). A laboratory SHED,
capable of complying with the federal test procedure for evaporative emissions certification7, is
expensive to build, maintain, and operate. Laboratory SHEDs are typically used for assessment
of hot-soak and diurnal emissions.
For purposes of this project, a more practical and cost-effective approach was devised to
enable timely measurement of the relatively large sample of vehicles included in the study. The
basis of the approach adopted is a "portable" or "temporary" vehicle shelter tent. The tent used
had nominal dimensions of 20'0" long x 10'8" wide x 9'9" high, giving an internal volume of
As specified in 40 CFR Part 86, Subpart B.
3-5
-------
approximately 1,788 ft3. The enclosure did not have a floor or well-sealed joints where the
different pieces of fabric met. For this study, project staff placed sheet plastic on the floor and
across fabric joints and sealed the plastic to the enclosure fabric with duct tape. Additionally, a
removable sheet of plastic was used for a second layer on the floor. This sheet was checked
between tests to ensure that no fluid leaks caused increases in background concentrations and to
prevent damage caused by vehicles driving in and out. The background concentration was
monitored between tests to detect additional sources of hydrocarbon vapors. As necessary, the
flooring sheet was cleaned if such sources were identified. This enclosure will be referred to as
the "portable SHED" (PSHED).
To promote mixing of air and vapors throughout the enclosure and reliable measurement
of vapor concentrations, two 10-inch diameter floor fans were used along with one 20-inch box
fan. The smaller fans were located coaxially in series at the top of the enclosure returning air
backwards over the top of the vehicle, and the box fan was located behind the vehicle facing
forward, directing air under the center rear of the vehicle. The adequacy of air circulation was
confirmed by monitoring the time dependence of hydrocarbon concentrations during releases of
propane inside the enclosure.
The PSHED was instrumented to continuously measure hydrocarbon concentrations,
temperature, and barometric pressure. The HC analyzer and control software dedicated to the
I/M lane housing the PSHED were modified to read the HC concentration in the enclosure.
Sensors for temperature and pressure were also plumbed into the lane's control computer to
facilitate the density calculations required to convert relative HC concentration (ppm) to HC
mass (g). Each PSHED test produced a separate data file including a time series for HC
concentration, temperature, and ambient barometric pressure.
After the PSHED was constructed, calibration procedures were followed to verify that it
functioned properly. Background HC checks were performed to measure the hydrocarbons off-
gassed from the enclosure components into the enclosed air. In this test, the PSHED was closed
with no vehicle inside and the HC concentration measured over time. An additional calibration
test involved measurement of vapor retention and recovery within the PSHED. This test
measures both leakage and the ability of the HC analyzer to accurately detect vapors inside the
enclosure. In this test, a known quantity of propane was injected and then measured by the HC
analyzer over time for verification.
Figure 3-3 shows the PSHED with its door open and ventilating in preparation for a test.
Note the floor fan used to circulate air beneath the vehicle during the test. The two smaller fans
mounted to the ceiling are not visible. Also note that the PSHED is itself indoors to reduce
effects of direct sunlight and other weather elements on equipment and measurements.
3-6
-------
Figure 3-3. Portable SHED (PSHED) with Door Open
3.4.1 Performance
The PSHED and the test procedure used in this project was designed to mimic the hot-
soak portion of the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) used for emissions certification. The full FTP
requires several days to conduct conditioning, refueling, and specific tests of diurnal, hot-soak
and hot-running emissions. The PSFtED procedures resemble the hot-soak portion of the FTP,
and were designed to facilitate rapid and cost-effective measurement of emissions from large
numbers of vehicles within the I/M facility. Several aspects of the performance of the PSHED
are described below.
Accuracy. The accuracy of the PSHED value can be estimated from the retention and
recovery tests performed twice a day during field measurements. An analysis of retention and
recovery results from the Lipan Street I/M station pilot study revealed that the average recovery
of a known amount of propane was 97.6% with a standard deviation of 3.3%. After 15 minutes
the average retention was 95.7% with a standard deviation of 2.3%. Thus, typical accuracies
were in the range of 91 to 104% for the 15-minute hot-soak measurement period.
Precision. The standard deviations of the retention and recovery tests give an indication
of the precision of measurements within the PSHED. Standard deviations of 2.3 to 3.3% seem to
be typical. While, these values are derived from propane injected into the empty PSHED, rather
than to actual measurements on sampled vehicles, they provide an estimate of measurement
variability attributable to the construction of the enclosure. Additional estimates of uncertainty
due to measurement variability arising from other sources were assessed through data on repeat
measurements in laboratory SHEDs (LSHED) and PSHEDs [15]. See Appendix D for
comparison of PSHED and LSHED data.
3-7
-------
Limit of Quantitation. The hot-soak measurement in the PSHED was obtained from a
cumulative time series of concentrations with a vehicle inside. Off-gassing tests were also made
by monitoring the PSHED HC concentration over a period of time when a vehicle was not inside.
Examination of the HC time series from the off-gassing tests and the background measurements
in the few minutes before a vehicle was placed into the PSHED indicates that the enclosure is
capable of quantifying a change in vapor concentrations over 15 minutes equivalent to a mass
rate of approximately 0.01 g/Qhr or more.
Bias. To assess correspondence between PSHED and LSHED measurements, CDPHE
staff measured hot-soak emissions from 15 vehicles over a 15-minute period in both enclosures.
An analysis of data is included in Appendix D. It shows that the PSHED tends to show a slight
negative bias relative to the LSHED. This result appears to agree with the tendency of the
retentions and recoveries of the PSHED to be less than 100%. In any case, the PSHED serves as
a reasonable surrogate for the LSHED in that the correlation between PSHED and LSHED is
approximately as high as that seen between repeat measurements in either the PSHED or the
LSHED.
3.5 Procedure
After a vehicle was recruited, the following procedure was followed. The steps are
summarized in Figure 3-4.
• Check gas cap - After the I/M test was complete, which included a gas cap
pressure check, project staff checked that the vehicle gas cap was installed
properly and tightly.
• Condition in I/M Lane - For conditioning, the vehicles were driven over two
consecutive EVI240 cycles on the dynamometer in the unused lane of the station;
emissions of the vehicle were not measured during these cycles. If the lane was
not available, or if the vehicle was all-wheel drive or had permanent traction
control, a member of the staff drove the vehicle on the road for approximately 10
minutes on Kipling Parkway.
• Perform MCM Inspection - The vehicle was then immediately moved to a
reserved location in the building without turning off the engine. The vehicle was
parked and staff member performed an initial inspection, following the "Modified
California Method," as described above. This step included a visual inspection of
the evaporative and fuel systems as well as the air surrounding these components
with a hydrocarbon vapor detection tool, or "sniffer." The inspector followed a
checklist in the data packet as a guide (see page C-10 of Appendix C). The
inspector made notes describing unusual findings, including components that
could not be located.
3-8
-------
Figure 3-4. Procedure for Sampling, Recruitment, and Testing
at Ken Caryl Station
H
tf
(ft
IM Station Driveway:
Selection RSM
Driver Solicitation
Complete Page 1 of Packet
Vehicle N. Yes
Targeted?
PSHEDTest
SIS Eligible?
Both RSMs
Valid?
Vehicle
Released
Participant:
Check Gas Cap
Tighten if Necessary
Conditioning
on Dyno
MCM Inspection,
Vehicle Information,
and Snapshots
IM Station Driveway:
Measurement
RSMs
2 at 12 mph
i
Yes
i
High way On Ramps:
Measurement
RSMs
2at55 mph, 2 at34 mph
3-9
-------
Record Vehicle Information - The inspector then recorded detailed vehicle
information such as the vehicle identification number (VEST), engine and
evaporative families, and the fuel level (see page C-12 of Appendix C). Finally, a
staff member took digital pictures of the front and rear of the vehicle, the VIN,
and the under-hood emissions family (VECI) label. The front and rear pictures
included both the license plate as well as a board displaying the packet ID number
to positively connect the vehicle pictures to the corresponding data packet.
Condition on the Road - Following the inspection, the vehicle was driven over a
specified drive route to stabilize the engine at operating temperature. The route
took approximately 15 minutes and is shown in Figure 3-5. During the
conditioning run, additional remote-sensing measurements were obtained on each
vehicle. However, these measurements were not used in the analysis and are not
discussed further.
Ventilate PSHED - While the vehicle was on the conditioning route, the PSHED
was opened with the fans circulating to minimize background HC levels by
flushing vapors remaining from the previous vehicle.
Warm up vehicle - When the vehicle returned from its conditioning run, it was
brought to the PSHED entrance with the engine running.
Initiate PSHED software - The operator started the SHED test procedure in the
software and recorded the time, HC concentration, temperature, and ambient
barometric pressure as "Initial PSHED" conditions in the data packet (see page C-
16 of Appendix C). The operator started continuous (1 Hz) electronic data
collection through the modified I/M lane analyzer and software.
Bring the vehicle into the PSHED - The driver drove the vehicle toward the
PSHED entrance and shut off the engine prior to entering. The driver then coasted
into the PSHED and stopped when the door could be closed behind the vehicle.
The operator placed the box fan behind the vehicle facing forward. Concurrently,
the driver quickly exited the vehicle and assisted the operator in zipping the door
shut and attaching a magnetic flap at the bottom of the door. The operator
recorded the time, HC concentration, temperature, and ambient barometric
pressure as "Door Sealed" conditions in the data packet.
Perform Hot-Soak Test - The vehicle was left to soak in the PSHED for 15
minutes. Conditions within the enclosure including the hydrocarbon concentration
were measured continuously at 1 Hz during this period.
Record final conditions - After the hot-soak was complete at 900 seconds after
sealing the door, the operator recorded the HC concentration, temperature, and
pressure inside the PSHED as the "Final PSHED" conditions in the data packet.
The software then calculated the total mass of hydrocarbons released by the
vehicle during the 900-second period. The hot-soak value for each vehicle was
3-10
-------
calculated as the difference in hydrocarbon concentration observed over the 900
sec period following the "door sealed" point.
• Remove vehicle - The PSHED was then opened, the vehicle driven out, and fans
left circulating in order to ventilate the PSHED for the next test vehicle.
• Repeat Tests - If a problem was encountered with the measurement systems
during the PSHED test, the vehicle was conditioned again over duplicate I/M240s
and tested again. Such problems were uncommon.
• Release the Vehicle - The final step of the process for most vehicles was meeting
with the driver again, paying the incentive, receiving the rental car if loaned, and
returning the keys and vehicle to the driver.
Figure 3-5. Conditioning Route and Locations of Remote-Sensing Instruments
* f"l £££.
„ , l RMsniIB
«***•-«• ft*
FIN. 1 i
KOTO*
•**•(.
^^
<
/
X \ K.n'ciir^l
I/M Station
\
•»o
—«^
t / ..-—
>
h
The data collection process occupied two lanes of the I/M station. Figure 3-6 shows the
lanes that were used for vehicle warm-up/conditioning on the dynamometer, the inspection, and
the PSHED. The two leftmost lanes in the photograph were those that were in use for the I/M
inspections.
3-11
-------
Figure 3-6. Study Layout at Ken Caryl Station
3.6 Data Quality-Control Procedures
A paper data packet (Appendix C) was started for each vehicle to be recruited. Each
packet was labeled with a unique identification number. Packets and packet numbers were
assigned to solicitations that resulted in non-participants as well as those that resulted in
participants. Occasionally, vehicles were selected more than once by the Driveway RSD unit. In
those cases, an individual vehicle had more than one packet assigned to it.
Information about each vehicle was recorded in the packet. For non-participating
vehicles, the packet information included the recruiter contact date and time, remote-sensing
measurements, and EI23 Bin, as well as vehicle information such as make, model, model year,
license plates, and study eligibility status (see page C-land C-2 of Appendix C). For
participating vehicles, additional detailed information was recorded in the packet, including
vehicle history, conditioning information, I/M gas cap inspection result, inspection results and
PSHED results. A total of 569 Packet ID Numbers were created.
3-12
-------
The paper data packets were transcribed into an Excel spreadsheet that included all
available information for each packet ID number. This spreadsheet was then read into SAS
format as the foundation of a database for the study.
A paper log was maintained by the operators of each remote-sensing unit. Each
participating vehicle that passed the unit was recorded in the paper log, including date, time, rear
license plate, make and model. The logs were transcribed and read into SAS format. The log data
was matched to the packet data, and any disagreement between the two (such as differing license
plates, or incorrect dates or times) was investigated and resolved. The investigation included (as
needed) inspection of photographs of the rear of each vehicle, inspection photos of the vehicle,
VIN, and VECI label, and the original paper packet and log sheets.
The data file containing all remote-sensing observations was read into SAS format and
merged with the packet and RSD log. Again, any discrepancies were investigated and resolved.
All I/M inspection records for the Ken Caryl station for the dates of this study were
obtained and read into SAS. These were matched to the packet, remote-sensing log, and remote-
sensing data, and again any discrepancies were investigated and resolved.
At this point, a complete database had been created, containing all vehicle information,
remote-sensing information, gas-cap result, inspection results, PSHED, and EVI240 results, for
each vehicle with a packet ID number.
3-13
-------
3-14
-------
4.0 Analysis
4.1 Data Examination
During the project, nearly 6,000 vehicles entering Ken Caryl station were screened. In
Table 4-1, the screening results for the entire set are tabulated by model-year group. The
majority of vehicles were in the 1996-2003 model-year group (57%), although substantial
fractions were in the 1981-1995 and 2004-2010 model-year groups (24% and 17%, respectively).
Not unexpectedly, vehicles manufactured prior to 1980 formed a small fraction of incoming
vehicles (1.6%).
From the set of screened vehicles, 550 individual vehicles were targeted for solicitation
for evaporative emissions measurement. These vehicles fell into three groups: 50 ineligible
vehicles, 325 eligible non-participating vehicles, and 175 participating vehicles. Thus, these
counts indicate that 35% (=175/500) of eligible vehicles participated in the intensive evaporative
emissions testing.
Ineligible Vehicles - Ineligibility was determined at the time of solicitation by the
recruiter in consultation with other members of the project staff. The reasons for ineligibility
were "Too Big" (26 vehicles), "Heavy-Duty" (1 vehicle), "Motorhome" (19 vehicles), and "ESP
o
employee " (4 vehicles). The "Too Big," "Heavy-Duty," and "Motorhome" vehicles were
ineligible because they would not be able to fit inside the PSHED. Occasionally, the vehicles of
ESP employees assisting with the project would be targeted by the remote-sensing unit as they
entered the I/M station grounds. Since these vehicles were not vehicles entering the station for an
inspection, they were not considered eligible for solicitation.
Eligible Non-Participants - A subset of vehicles designated as "Commercial Vehicle"
(1 vehicle), "Dealer" (7 vehicles), "Fleet Vehicle" (3 vehicles), "Not Owner" (10 vehicles) were
not included in the study even though the project staff considered them eligible. "Dealer"
vehicles were brought to the I/M station for inspection by an automobile dealer. "Not Owner"
vehicles were driven by a party other than the owner who was not comfortable committing the
vehicle to the project. The drivers of the remaining 304 eligible not-participating vehicles chose
not to participate for a variety of reasons.
Participants - Table 4-2 and Table 4-3 show the distributions of EI23 Bin by model year
group for the 500 eligible vehicles and 175 participants, respectively. Both tables show that
vehicles in older model-year groups tend to have higher index values than those in newer model-
year groups. Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2 show the model-year distributions of the sets of eligible
and participating vehicles, respectively. The figures show that sixteen MY 2006-2009 vehicles
were eligible, but none of the owners of those vehicles chose to participate. In the analysis that
follows, the 2004-2010 model year group is represented by the 13 vehicles in MY 2004-2005.
Eligible vehicles in the 2004-2005 model year group assigned to EI23 Bins 4 and 5 did not
participate.
8 The inspection and maintenance program is ran by Environmental Systems Products (ESP) under contract to the
State of Colorado.
4-1
-------
Table 4-1. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group
for Screened Vehicles
EI23 Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total
Model Year Group
1961-1970
0
3
4
5
4
2
2
20
1971-1980
5
14
14
16
7
6
9
71
1981-1995
227
482
395
150
67
33
30
1,384
1996-2003
761
1,425
911
187
19
19
8
3,330
2004-2010
247
456
285
33
4
0
0
1,025
Total
1,240
2,380
1,609
391
101
60
49
5,830
Table 4-2. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group
for Eligible Vehicles in the Sample
EI23 Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total
Model Year Group
1961-1970
0
1
0
2
4
2
1
10
1971-1980
0
0
0
4
4
6
3
17
1981-1995
10
27
28
38
36
22
26
187
1996-2003
41
69
36
38
12
15
5
216
2004-2010
12
28
20
7
3
0
0
70
Total
63
125
84
89
59
45
35
500
Table 4-3. Screening Index (EI23 Bin) by Model-Year Group
for Participating Vehicles
EI23 Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total
Model Year Group
1961-1970
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
4
1971-1980
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
7
1981-1995
5
11
12
9
14
9
15
75
1996-2003
17
24
9
10
5
6
5
76
2004-2010
3
6
4
0
0
0
0
13
Total
25
41
25
20
24
18
22
175
4-2
-------
Figure 4-1. Model-Year Distribution for Eligible Vehicles
0
.
2
2
'
l-
-
i
11
1 :
i-
II
.
21
.4
I
•!
'
B
./
u
'.
-
97
118
IX
154
188
234
284
287
312
329
3BC
430
448
$
497
"Yo To
4
"
.'
, 4
•
4
• a
.
: :
4
•-
- 4
. 4
M
• i
4
-
• ;i
.-.-
II
. ,-•
i
•
• :•
4-
•4
' 4
4.,
|C
i
r.i
14
4
I
r
-
4
4
11
•
• 6
u
.''•
.
. I
ii
, f.
•r
'4
90
106
11 4
124
144
232
»0
xs
37«
428
«8
528
574
834
668
732
780
«0
ae;
»4
988
1030
1000
Figure 4-2. Model-Year Distribution for Participating Vehicles
..
9257
9543
• .'•
288
457
aoc
000
000
000 10000
000 10000
.
10000
loooo
toooo
4-3
-------
Cumulative distributions of the raw unweighted PSHED results by model-year group for
the 175 participants are shown in Figure 4-3. The scale on the x-axis shows that the fractions of
vehicles interpreted as having "high" emissions depends on the values assigned as threshold(s).
Note that these distributions do not reflect the effects of unequal-probability sampling or
differential response rates. Therefore, these distributions cannot be taken as representative of the
fleet sampled. The process involved in incorporating these factors is described in the next section
and will produce substantially different distributions.
Figure 4-3. Cumulative Unweighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED
Measurements by Model-Year Group
1 0
0.10
1 00
1000
10000
High-PSHED Definition (g/qHr)
4.2 Distributions of Hot-Soak Emissions
The previous section presented results for the 175-vehicle sample. However, because the
vehicles were sampled with unequal rather than equal probabilities, additional analysis is
required to develop representative results. Due to the sampling method used, the sample is likely
to contain more vehicles with elevated PSHED values than the population as a whole.
Nevertheless, it is possible to estimate the distributions of the PSHED values for the sampled
population by considering the differential sampling rates. In addition, it is necessary to account
for potential effects of differential non-response, which may be considered as a secondary
"sampling" process.
When vehicles enter the sample with different selection probabilities, it is necessary to
assign them different weights during analysis. With respect to sampling, the weight assigned to
each vehicle is the reciprocal of its sampling probability. Thus, vehicles in the seven EI23 Bins
sampled at probabilities of 0.06, 0.30, or 1.0 were assigned sampling weights of 16.67, 3.33, or
1.00, respectively. In each case, the weight represents the number of vehicles in the sampled fleet
4-4
-------
represented by each vehicle drawn into the sample. A related result is that the weights of all
vehicles in the sample should sum to the number of vehicles in the sample pool.
However, in this project, the weights of the 175 measured vehicles do not sum to this
total, because measurements for all vehicles in the sample were not obtained, as not all owners
solicited elected to participate. For a variety of reasons 35% of drivers chose to participate and
65% chose not to participate.
It is important to recognize that non-response can change the intended structure of a
sample, if response rates follow differential patterns by the important variables describing the
structure of the population. If the rate of positive response to the solicitation is a function of the
response variables for the project, or important variables characterizing the population,
classifying response rates by these variables allows response to be treated as a secondary
"sampling" process that also occurred with unequal probability. Table 4-4 shows the counts of
eligible vehicles that were solicited and measured, by model-year group, as well as
corresponding response rates. Overall, response rate was 35%, but the response rates suggest that
owners of newer vehicles were less likely to participate than owners of older vehicles.
Table 4-4. Solicitation Response Rate by Model-Year Group
Model-Year
Group
1961- 1970
1971- 1980
1981- 1995
1996-2003
2004-2010
Overall
No. Eligible Vehicles
Solicited
10
17
187
216
70
500
No. Eligible Vehicles
Participating
4
7
75
76
13
175
Response Rate
0.400
0.412
0.401
0.352
0.186
0.350
Table 4-5. Solicitation Response Rate by EI23 Bin
EI23 Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Overall
No. Eligible Vehicles
Solicited
63
125
84
89
59
45
35
500
No. Eligible Vehicles
Participating
25
41
25
20
24
18
22
175
Response Rate
0.397
0.328
0.298
0.225
0.407
0.400
0.629
0.350
The low response rate for the 2004-2010 model year group suggests that drivers of new
vehicles could be reluctant to release their vehicles into the care of project staff, or that they may
simply not have wanted to assume the burden of participation. While drivers were certainly not
aware of their EI23 Bin, the recruiters were. In fact, recruiters were given the EI23 Bin
assignments of each vehicle to be solicited so that they could make special efforts to recruit
4-5
-------
vehicles in the highest three Bins. These efforts could have contributed to the noticeably higher
response rate for Bin 7, as shown in Table 4-5.
4.2.1 Calculation of Weighted Frequencies
If response is viewed a secondary "sampling" process, response rates can be viewed as
"sampling probabilities" and used to construct "response" weights that can supplement the initial
set of sampling weights. For the purposes of this project the response structure based on model
year group as shown in Table 4-4 was used. On this basis, a combined or "final" weight (wfmai)
can be calculated as the product of the sampling and response weights (w^mpie, ^response), as
shown in Equation 4-1. The equation can also be expressed as the product of the reciprocals of
the sampling fractions and response rates/sample
4-1
After a final weight has been assigned to each vehicle, it is possible to relate the sample
measurements to the population under study. As a first step, it can be shown that the sum of the
final weights is an estimate of the size of the sample pool (5,830 vehicles). In addition, estimates
of the fractions of vehicles with "elevated" evaporative emissions can be calculated, once a
definition of "elevated" has been specified, by summing the weights of vehicles with "elevated"
levels and dividing this total by the sum of weights for all vehicles, as shown in Equation 4-2.
2>fmal
elevated
f elevated .— -• - -*
/elevated = — Equation 4-2
LWfmal
Total
As model-year group is an important surrogate for important differences in technology
and emissions standards, we performed this calculation by model-year group, as well as for the
entire fleet sampled. The use of model-year groups as surrogates for technology and standard
levels is approximate, and is imprecise during phase-in periods when the composition of vehicles
entering the market is in flux. Nonetheless, it was adopted as a reasonable practical compromise,
because while characterizing vehicles by their standards would have been ideal (and probably
superior), it would also have been extremely burdensome for vehicles manufactured between
1994 and 2000, and probably impossible for vehicles manufactured prior to 1994.
Despite the fact that the processes of screening and sampling did not distinguish model
year prior to drawing vehicles into the sample, fractions of vehicles with "elevated" emissions
can be calculated by model-year group, as each subset of measured vehicles in each group can be
taken as an independent subsample of the total sample.
4-6
-------
4.2.2 Utility of the Screening Index
An example can illustrate the utility of the screening index as well as the importance of
accounting for unequal sampling fractions and differential response rates in analysis. We have
used the results from the 1991-95 model years.
For purposes of this calculation we have assigned thresholds to define "elevated"
emissions for both the screening index and the PSHED measurements. For the screening index, a
value greater than 200 is defined as "elevated," and for the hot-soak measurement, a value
greater than 1.0 g/Qhr is defined as "elevated." Note that the index is assumed to indicate the
probability that vehicles have elevated emissions, and that the PSHED is taken as a "truth
measurement" relative to the screening index.
Figure 4-4 shows a scatter plot of unweighted hot-soak measurements vs. screening
indices for this model-year group. This presentation suggests a strong correlation between the
measurement and the index, and that a high fraction of vehicles have elevated emissions, as
defined for this example. Figure 4-5 shows a scatter plot of the same results, accounting for the
effects of unequal sampling and response rates. To incorporate these factors, each measurement
was replicated Wfma\ times in the plot, with a random disturbance then applied to the replicate
measurements to make all data points visible (i.e., "dithering"). These steps account for the fact
that cleaner vehicles, sampled at lower rates, represent correspondingly more vehicles in the fleet
than "dirtier" vehicles, sampled at correspondingly higher rates. In the "weighted" presentation,
it is still evident that the index shows some utility, but that the fraction of vehicles with elevated
emissions is lower than the unweighted presentation would suggest.
As we are using a set of two thresholds in this example, one for the index and another for
the PSHED, this framework lends itself to expression in a 2x2 table, both for estimating fractions
of vehicles with elevated emissions and for assessing the usefulness of the index.
Table 4-6 shows both unweighted vehicle counts in a table format corresponding to the
figures. If we take these counts at face value, and neglect the effects of unequal sampling and
response rates, we would estimate the "elevated" fraction as 42/98 vehicles, or 43%.
Table 4-7 shows the corresponding analysis accounting for unequal-probability sampling
and response rates. Rather than estimating the frequency based on raw vehicle counts, we use
sums of final weights as shown in Equation 4-2. On this basis we estimate the "elevated" fraction
as 172.5/1,222, or 14%. Having accounted for the effects of sampling and response, we interpret
the weighted value as more representative of the sampled fleet than the raw unweighted value.
4-7
-------
Figure 4-4. Unweighted Hot-Soak (PSHED) Measurements vs. Evaporative Indices
(EI23) for Measured Vehicles in the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group
(Note: This presentation does not account for unequal sampling or response rates.)
1000 000
too ooo
10000
Q 1000
LU
5P 0,100
0010
0.001
* »
« * * *
* •*.
100 1000 10000 100000
Evaporative Index (E[23)
Figure 4-5. Weighted Hot-Soak (PSHED) Measurements vs. Evaporative Indices
(EI23) for Measured Vehicles in the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group
1000000
t 100000
O 10000
0
UJ
% looo
$ 0100
I
b 0010
0001
••••V ! •
- -. .V^-S9".{.-'- . * •
•:
100
10000
100000
Evaporative Index (EI23)
4-8
-------
Table 4-6. Counts of Measured Vehicles Having Index and PSHED Values
Less Than and Greater Than Designated Thresholds
for the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group
High EI23
Q
W
PH
.££
t/2
W
*
O
z
NO
c
8
rf
53
YES
a
34
ft
3
Total
a+c
42
b+d
56
c+d a+b a+b+c+d
Total 61 37 98
Sensitivity = al(a+c) = 34/42 = 81.0%.
Specificity = dl(b+d) = 53/56 = 94.6%.
Positive Predictive Value = al(a+b) = 34/37 = 91.9%
Negative Predictive Value = dl(c+d) = 53/61 = 86.7%.
NOTE: fraction of vehicles with PSHED measurements > 1.0 g/Qhr = 42/98 = 0.43
Table 4-7. Sums of Final Weights Having Index and PSHED Values
Less Than and Greater Than Designated Thresholds
for the 1991-1995 Model-Year Group
High EI23
Q 5«
W g
W >
O5
PM
MI O
H Z
NO
c
72.0
rf
961.5
YES
100.5
88.0
a
b
Total 1,033.5
188.5
Sensitivity = a/(a+c) = 100.5/172.5 = 58.2%.
Specificity = d/(6+d) = 961.5/1,049.5 = 91.6%.
Positive Predictive Value = a/(a+b) = 100.5/188.5 = 53.3%
Negative Predictive Value = d/(c+d) = 961.5/1,033.5 = 93.0%.
Total
a+c
172.5
b+d
1,049.5
a+b+c+d
1,222.0
NOTE: fraction of final weights with PSHED measurements > 1.0 g/Qhr = 172.5/1,222 = 0.14.
4-9
-------
4.2.3 Effectiveness of the Screening Index
In addition to estimating "elevated" frequencies, we can use the 2x2 table format to
assess the effectiveness of the screening index for this model-year group, using measures
commonly used to assess screening in epidemiology. For this purpose it is appropriate to use
sums of weights rather than vehicle counts, as the weighted results describe we would expect if
we sampled the population fully at random. The measures considered include sensitivity,
specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value.
Two of these measures concern the validity of a screening measure. In our context,
"sensitivity" is defined as the probability of screening "positive" if the "disease" is present, i.e., a
high screening index if the vehicle does in fact have high hot-soak emissions (high PSHED).
"Specificity" is defined as the probability of screening "negative" if in fact the "disease" is
absent, i.e., obtaining a low index if the vehicle has low hot-soak emissions (low PSHED). Thus
a screening measure that is "sensitive" or "specific" is expected to produce few "false negatives"
or "false positives," respectively.
The two remaining measures are used to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of the
index. "Negative predictive value" is the probability that the "disease" is absent if the screening
test is negative, i.e., a low EI23 value if vehicles in fact have low hot-soak emissions. The
measure of greatest interest to us in this project is the "positive predictive value," i.e., the
probability that vehicles will prove to have high PSHED measurements if their EI23 values are
high. For purposes of sampling this measure suggests the "yield" of vehicles with high hot-soak
emissions expected to be available for measurement if the index is applied in sampling. In
contrast to sensitivity and specificity, negative and positive predictive values assess rates of "true
negatives" and "true positives," respectively.
The calculation of all four measures is demonstrated in Table 4-6 and Table 4-7, for
unweighted and weighted results, respectively. Based on weighted results, the index appears to
perform reasonably well based on all four measures for the 1991-95 model-year group. This
index appears to be quite specific (few false positives) and to have higher negative prediction
(>90%) than positive prediction. These results suggest that the use of the index was effective in
improving the efficiency of sampling for purposes of measurement. Based on the example shown,
applying the index can yield a sample of vehicles in which 5.3/10 vehicles screening "high" are
expected to test "high" in the PSHED, as opposed to sampling fully at random, for which these
results suggest that 1.4/10 vehicles sampled might be expected to test "high." Similarly,
approximately 9/10 vehicles screening "low" are expected to test "low."
However, the measures of effectiveness, particularly the positive predictive value, are in
part a function of the prevalence of "high" emissions in the vehicle population. Thus we would
expect the index to be useful, but somewhat less effective for vehicle sub-populations in which
vehicles with "elevated" emissions are rarer than in the example discussed to this point. This
conclusion appears to hold for MY 1996-2003, which represents improved technologies and
control systems measured at younger ages than MY 1991-95. Based on sums of weights, the
specificity and positive predictive value for 1996-2003 are 94% and 14%, respectively. However,
for this group, the relatively low sensitivity (23%) indicates that more false negatives are to be
4-10
-------
expected than in older vehicles. This result underscores the importance of measuring vehicles
with low as well as high values of the screening index.
Using the same definition as in the example described above (1.0 g/Qhr), Table 4-8
shows estimated fractions for elevated emissions in each of the five model-year groups, using
both unweighted vehicle counts and sums of final weights. Clearly and as expected, the fractions
of "high" PSHED values decline with model-year group, illustrating the combined effects of
technology, emission controls, and vehicle age.
Table 4-8. Sample Calculations for a 1.0 g/Qhr High-PSHED Definition,
by Model-Year Group
Model
Year
Group
1961 - 1970
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991 - 1995
1996-2003
2004-2010
Overall
Number of
Vehicles
4
7
26
49
76
13
175
Number of
Vehicles with
High PSHED
4
7
18
21
9
0
Fraction with High PSHED
Unweighted
1.00
1.00
0.69
0.43
0.12
0.00
0.34
Weighted
1.00
0.95
0.54
0.14
0.03
0.00
0.12
Positive
Predictive
Value
0.86
0.53
0.14
The table above shows results for a specific definition of "elevated" hot-soak emissions.
The definition used simply illustrates the calculation of "elevated" fractions across model-year
groups as well as the utility of the screening index. The relationships of the estimated high-
PSHED fractions to a range of high-PSHED definitions (0.01-100 g/Qhr) across the model-year
groups are shown in Figure 4-6. This presentation represents cumulative distributions of high-
PSHED fractions with respect to varying thresholds, accounting for unequal-probability
sampling and response rates. Thus, these results are estimates for the fleet of vehicles sampled at
Ken Caryl station during the project. Similar results for the fleet as a whole are shown in Figure
4-7. The distributions shown in the figures imply ranges of PSFLED values for each model-year
group, and for the fleet as a whole. For purposes of illustration, selected percentile values for
weighted distributions are shown in Table 4-9.
4-11
-------
Figure 4-6. Weighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED Hot-Soak Emissions,
by Model-Year Group
10
001
010
1 00
1000
10000
High-PSHED Definition (g/Qhr)
— IHn.lMO • • '• 19*1 1996 • • • 19W20C3 mm* SCO* 2010
Figure 4-7. Weighted Cumulative Distributions of PSHED Hot-Soak Emissions for
the Sampled Fleet
• o
010 100 1000
High-PSHED Definition (g/Qhr)
10000
4-12
-------
Table 4-9. Selected Percentile Values for PSHED Measurements (g/Qhr),
based on Weighted Distributions
Model Year Group
1961- 1970
1971- 1980
1981- 1995
1996-2003
2004-2010
Overall
10th Percentile
-
est. 5
0.047
0.017
0.015
0.015
50th Percentile (Median)
13
7.6
0.23
0.037
0.022
0.043
90th Percentile
-
est. 20
4.6
0.14
0.038
0.57
4.3 Discussion
4.3.1 Fleet Composition and Representativeness
The vehicle fleet to be sampled was accessed through the Ken Caryl station during the
months of July to September. Vehicles sampled, recruited, and measured comprised a pool of
vehicles coming to the station, primarily for purposes of receiving routine inspections. That the
sampled fleet was accessed in this manner has implications that must be considered in the
interpretation of the results.
First, the pool of vehicles entering the station does not include vehicles exempted from
inspections through the clean-screen program. As the criteria for exemption include
measurements of exhaust CO and NO, as well as HC, it is difficult to assess the probable effects
of this factor on the representativeness of the sample of vehicles undergoing PSHED
measurements. It is plausible that the sets of vehicles in recent model years available for
recruitment was lower than it would have been, absent the existence of "clean screen." However,
it is not clear that exempted vehicles would differ markedly in terms of their evaporative
emissions from those not exempted. At most sites typically selected for remote-sensing, such as
freeway on-ramps, drivers pass the instrument at speeds of 30 mph or higher. However, remote-
sensing instruments are not effective at detecting evaporative emissions at these speeds, for
which reason, clean-screen would not be expected to exempt vehicles preferentially based on
their evaporative emissions.
Second, Ken Caryl station is located in the southwest corner of the Denver metropolitan
area. As the area served by this station is likely to be more affluent than areas served by other
stations or the metropolitan area as a whole, it is possible that fleet composition and repair status
may differ from those in other areas. One implication is that the model-year distributions at Ken
Caryl might be different than at other stations, with older and recent model years being less and
more prevalent at Ken Caryl than elsewhere, respectively. This difference is presumably
neutralized to a large degree by analyzing the results by model-year group. However, the results
obtained at Ken Caryl might be unrepresentative of the Denver Metropolitan Area if higher
affluence were correlated with frequent maintenance and general "repair status." If we assume
that improved maintenance status was associated with lower prevalence of "elevated"
evaporative emissions, we can surmise that the results observed in this project can be construed
as somewhat conservative, relative to rates expected for a wider geographic area.
4-13
-------
A variety of factors related to vehicles, fuels, and ambient conditions can influence the
rates or levels of evaporative emissions. As this project was designed as a survey rather than as a
controlled experiment, a number of factors were not controlled. Some factors were measured and
others were not. Table 4-10 summarizes the major factors that presumed to influence evaporative
emissions during the project, and whether the factor was measured.
Table 4-10. Control and Measurement of Factors Affecting Evaporative Emissions
Factor
Degree of control
Measurement Method
Vehicle Factors
Fuel Metering technology
Emissions control technology
Maintenance history/status
Driving history before sampling/recruitment
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Engine Family
Engine Family
Modified California Method
Questionnaire
Fuel Factors
Ethanol Content
Volatility of fuel in tank
Fuel level in tank
Variable
Variable
Variable
Not measured
Not Measured
Fuel Gauge
Test/Ambient Conditions
Conditioning
Ambient Temperature
PSHED Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Standardized
Variable
Variable
Variable
IM240 cycles/Drive route
Remote -sensing instrument
I/M Lane Analyzer
I/M Lane Analyzer
In laboratory studies of evaporative emissions, many of the factors listed in the table are
held constant. Holding factors constant allows the results from different tests to be compared on
an equal basis. Alternatively, one or more factors can be held constant or systematically varied to
investigate the effects of single or multiple variables. As this study was designed to estimate the
prevalence of "elevated" evaporative emissions in a vehicle population, it was necessary to apply
quick and inexpensive methods to allow relatively rapid measurements of large numbers of
vehicles. At the same time, some of the factors, including temperatures, pressure and fuel
volatility were effectively limited to relatively narrow ranges by the fact that the project was
conducted at one location during the summer. Nonetheless, these advantages also imply that
these factors must be accounted for in interpretation and application of the results.
The maintenance status of vehicle fuel metering systems and evaporative emissions
control systems was subjectively characterized using the visual, olfactory, and hydrocarbon
sniffer results of the Modified California Method. In addition, the presence and source of
hydrocarbon vapors or liquid fuel was ascertained when possible. The results of these inspections
are reported in Appendix F.
4.3.2 Effects of Ambient Conditions
It is known that vehicle evaporative emission rates can be affected by a number of
environmental factors, including ambient temperature, ambient pressure, and the level of fuel in
4-14
-------
the fuel tank of the vehicle. It was beyond the scope of this study to control for each of these
factors, but they were recorded.
Figure 4-8 shows the distributions of temperatures inside the PSHED at the beginning of
each test at the time that the door was sealed with the participating vehicle inside. These values
range from 65°F to 95°F, with the median around 82°F. The median values agree closely, as
expected, although the maxima are 15-20°F cooler than measured at the remote-sensing van.
In Figure 4-9, the PSHED temperatures at the beginning and at the end of the 15-minute
test are plotted against each other and in relation to a one-to-one line. The figure shows good
correlation between beginning and ending temperatures, as expected, and that the temperature
inside the PSHED tended to increase by about 10°F as a result of heat released from the warmed-
up vehicle.
In Figure 4-10, the outdoor temperature at the remote-sensing van is plotted against the
initial PSHED temperature. Not unexpectedly, the correlation between these two measures is
lower than between the beginning and ending PSHED results. The increased variability may be
due to a variety of factors affecting the temperature at the van, including solar heat load, shade
from nearby trees, and wind. Factors affecting the PSHED temperature can include residual heat
from the previous test and the lack of direct sun and wind.
The standard barometric pressure for sea level is 29.92 inches Hg. The distribution of
barometric pressure as measured at the PSHED for each participant test is shown in Figure 4-11.
Note that the median barometric pressure is about 24.4 inches Hg, about 82% of the standard
sea-level value.
The distribution of fuel tank levels for study participants is shown in Figure 4-12. Levels
ranged from nearly empty to full, with the median level between 40 and 50% full.
Fuel volatility also affects evaporative emissions. In this study all vehicles were tested
with "as-received" fuel in the vehicle's tank. According to CDPHE, the regulations for dispensed
gasoline from June 1 to September 15, 2009 (which includes the time period for the
measurements in this study) were a maximum Reid vapor pressure (RVP) of the clear gasoline of
7.8 psi and a maximum denatured ethanol content of 10 vol%. CDPHE also has a program to
measure the volatility and ethanol content of dispensed gasoline in Colorado. During this same
time period, the measurements from this program indicated that the typical gasoline properties
for the time period were 8.5 psi RVP and 9.3 vol% of the gasoline/ethanol blend. Since the
regulations allow a 1.0 psi RVP increase per 10 vol% of ethanol, the maximum allowed RVP on
a 9.3 vol% gasoline/ethanol blend would be 8.6 psi. Thus, the observed typical gasoline for the
study meets the regulations and lies within a relatively narrow range, reducing one source of
variability in the PSHED measurements.
4-15
-------
Figure 4-8. Distribution of PSHED Seal Temperature for Participating Vehicles
Figure 4-9. Initial PSHED Temperature vs. Final PSHED Temperature
K
1
1—«-
I
1
Q
UJ
. •
n to
PSHED Seal Temperature (deg. F)
4-16
-------
Figure 4-10. Selection RSD Temperature vs. Initial PSHED Temperature
••..
2,100
s
2 0
g.60
5
K
PSHED Seal Temperature (deg F)
Figure 4-11. Barometric Pressure at PSHED Sealing
U)
0)
CO
Q)
(/}
Q
UJ
4-17
-------
Figure 4-12. Fuel Tank Levels for Participating Vehicles
M »» 37M
10 »1C »5I
140 1*02 9140
173 IftOQ 10000
4-18
-------
4.3.3 Interpretation
The results in Figure 4-6 and Table 4-9 show trends in hot-soak emissions (as measured
by PSHED) with model year group for the Ken Caryl fleet. The median values cover almost
three orders of magnitude. The strong trends with model-year group reflect improvements in
fuel-metering and evaporative emissions control technologies, as well as, presumably, the effect
of vehicle age.
The results in Section 4.2 can also be related to the expectations for vehicles
manufactured since MY 1996, which have onboard diagnostics systems as well as enhanced
emission controls. For vehicles manufactured prior to 1996, these levels are simply convenient
references but have no regulatory significance. One such reference level is 1.0 g/Qhr, which in
terms of size, roughly corresponds to a cumulative leak of 0.020 inches in diameter, or the size of
the smallest leak in the fuel-system or evaporative emissions-control system required to be
detected by an OBD system under regulations promulgated by the California Air Resources
Board. A second level is 0.30 g/Qhr, which corresponds roughly to the hot-soak portion of the
enhanced evaporative emission standard of 2.0-2.5 g. EPA has estimated that the vast majority of
properly-operating vehicles with enhanced evaporative emission controls would have PSHED
values less than 0.30 g/Qhr.9
Table 4-11 shows the estimated fractions of the sampled fleet having PSHED hot-soak
values, exceeding a range of thresholds, of which the lowest is 0.3 g/Qhr. The fractions were
estimated from the estimated cumulative distributions shown in Figure 4-6. In addition to mean
proportions, estimated from weighted frequencies as shown in Equation 4-2, upper and lower
95% confidence limits are shown for two model-year groups. The bounds are calculated as an
"exact" binomial confidence interval, in which the upper and lower limits are estimated using the
Beta distribution, as shown in Equation 4-3 and Equation 4-410.
ot
= 1-B^— ,n-k,k + H Equation 4-3
7
(X
Equation 4-4
In the equations, the level of a is set to 0.05, n is the number of vehicles measured, and k
is the expected number of vehicles with "elevated" emissions out of n trials, given a weighted
mean proportion, calculated as shown in Equation 4-2.
The table shows that all vehicles manufactured prior to 1981 (when measured at 29+
years of age) are expected to have PSHEDs greater than 1.0 g/Qhr. For vehicles manufactured
9 EPA has estimated that a PSHED (hot-soak) value of 0.3 g/Qhr corresponds to the enhanced evaporative emissions
standard of 2.0-2.5 g. They arrived at this estimate by assuming that 20% of the 2 grams is attributable to the 1-hour
hot-soak portion of the standards, and that 75% of the 1-hour hot-soak emissions occurs in the first 15 minutes of the
hot-soak.
10Clopper, C.;Pearson, S. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the Binomial.
Biometrika 26:404-413. 1934.
4-19
-------
between 1981 and 1995 (measured at 14+ years of age), 26% and 39% of vehicles are expected
to exceed 1.0 and 0.30 g/Qhr, respectively (corresponding lower-bound estimates are 16% and
28%). For vehicles manufactured between 1996 and 2003 (measured at 5-13 years of age), and
employing both OBD systems and enhanced emission controls, corresponding fractions are 4.3%
and 6.4%, respectively (with lower-bound estimates of 1.0% and 2.1%). Finally, no vehicles
manufactured in 2004-2010 are expected to have PSFLEDs greater than 0.3 g/Qhr, although this
conclusion is based on a relatively small set of 13 measured vehicles. As previously noted,
eligible vehicles in EI23 Bins 4 and 5 for MY 2004-2010 were sampled, but the owners of these
vehicles elected not to participate in the study. However, previous experimental work using
vehicles in this model-year group acquired from the in-use fleet found some vehicles to have
leaks of various sizes [6].
For the entire fleet of vehicles accessed through Ken Caryl station, 14% of the vehicles
are expected to have PSHEDs greater than 0.3 g/Qhr. Again, note that these specific values apply
to LDVs, LDTls, and LDT2s measured under summer conditions.
Table 4-11. Fractions of PSHED Values Exceeding Selected Hot-Soak Emission
Thresholds (Based on Weighted Distributions)
Model
Year
Group
«veh
Parameter2
Fleet Fraction Exceeding
PSHED Hot-Soak Value (g/Qhr)
0.3 1.0 2.0
5.0
10
20
50
100
1961 - 1970 4
Mean
1.0
1.0
0.68 0.68
0.53 0.53
0.0
0.0
1971-1980 7
Mean
1.0
1.0
1.0 0.85
0.30
0.0
0.0
0.0
1981-1995
75
Upper
Mean
Lower
0.51
0.39
0.28
0.37
0.26
0.16
0.33
0.22
0.13
0.17
0.083
0.032
0.12
0.042
0.009
0.092
0.026
0.003
0.056
0.004
0.000
0.060
0.004
0.000
1996-2003
76
Upper
Mean
Lower
0.145
0.064
0.021
0.10
0.033
0.006
0.096
0.029
0.004
0.084
0.021
0.002
0.082
0.020
0.001
0.047
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
2004-2010
13
Overall
175
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.091
0.079
0.037
0.00
0.024
0.00
0.0084
0.00
0.001
0.00
0.0005
1 Number of vehicles measured.
"Mean" = mean proportion, calculated as shown in Equation 4-2, "Upper" = upper bound of 95% confidence interval,
calculated as shown in Equation 4-3 ; "Lower" = lower bound of 95% confidence interval, calculated as shown in Equation
4-4.
In addition to considering the distributions of PSHED results, it is helpful to relate them
to the results of the visual inspection. These results are summarized in Table 4-12, for two broad
model-year groups, pre-1996 and 1996-2010. The table also distinguishes counts for all PSFLED
results and for those results > 0.3 g/Qhr.
4-20
-------
Table 4-12. Results of Physical Inspection: Identified Vapor Sources by Location
for Two Model-Year Groups
Location
Exhaust manifold
Fuel pump
PCV
Carburetor
Fuel rail
Injector
Purge line
Cap
Fuel lines
Canister
Fill pipe
Tank
Other
SubTotal
Nothing Found
Total
All Vehicles
MY 1995
& earlier
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
3
2
7
8
10
0
38
49
87
MY 1996
& Later
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
7
1
15
74
89
Total
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
9
9
17
1
53
123
176
Vehicles with PSHED result
> 0.3 g/Qhr
MY 1995
& earlier
0
0
0
2
1
2
2
3
2
6
5
10
0
33
28
61
MY 1996
& Later
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
7
1
13
4
17
Total
0
1
0
2
2
2
2
3
3
8
5
17
1
46
32
78
Despite the quick and rudimentary nature of the inspection, it was often possible to
isolate vapor emissions to specific components of the fuel-delivery or emission-control systems.
Specific vapor sources were identified for 44% and 17% of all PSHED results in the pre-1996
and the 1996-2010 model-year groups, respectively. However, for the vehicles having PSHED
results > 0.3 g/Qhr, the fractions are higher, with vapor sources identified for 54% and 76% of
results in the pre-1996 and 1996-2010 model-year groups.
Overall, 13 specific vapor sources were isolated, with the most common being the fuel
tank, fill pipe, and canister. These three locations account for 66% of identified sources for all
PSHED results. Results also show that most identified vapor sources exceeded 0.3 g/Qhr, with
64% to 70% of sources exceeding this threshold attributed to these three locations. Vapor from
the canister can result from insufficient purge leading to breakthrough emissions or from
compromised hose connections to the canister resulting from normal maintenance. Components
in engine compartments are packed very tightly and often the canister must be moved to service
other components, and then replaced. During this process seals can be compromised, resulting in
tiny leaks.
4-21
-------
Figure 4-13 also shows the magnitude of PSHED results in relation to vapor source for
the two broad model-year groups. At the outset, the figure makes it clear that hot-soak emissions
are highly variable, ranging over three orders of magnitude for vehicles in both model year
groups. Not surprisingly, the figure shows that the hot-soak rates for the pre-1996 vehicles are
generally substantially higher than for the 1996-2010 vehicles. For pre-1996 vehicles, the largest
hot-soak rates isolated were attributed to the injector location, which exceed even those
attributed to the carburetor. For the 1996-2010 vehicles, the highest result was attributed to the
fuel rail. The three sites most frequently identified, tank, fill pipe, and canister, do not necessarily
have higher hot-soak rates than other sources, although the rates for these three sources differ
between the model-year groups, with the 1996-2010 group showing consistently lower rates.
An interesting outcome for the 1996-2010 model-year group is that the PSHED results
isolated to specific sites are markedly higher than those not so isolated (with three exceptions
identified as outliers on the plot). This outcome also holds for the pre-1996 group, although not
to the same degree. For the 1996-2010 group, however, the plot shows that roughly half of these
results identified as exceeding 0.3 g/Qhr in Table 4-9 in fact exceed 1.0 g/Qhr, and with two
results exceeding 10 g/Qhr.
When one views the potential sources of vapor emissions from in-use vehicles, they can
be placed into two broad categories. The first is vapor breakthrough from the evaporative
emissions canister as a result of purge system malfunction, canister related problems, off-cycle
fuel characteristics or atypical driving behaviors. The second is vapor emitted from very small
"micro-cracks" or orifices of very small diameter in various components of the system. Vapor
leaks from these cracks and orifices could emanate from failed seals injunctions between various
components, durability problems resulting from materials degradation and in-use wear due to
phenomena such as vibration, environmental factors, etc. Mai-maintenance, mis-installation or
mis-assembly of systems and components could also potentially contribute to the in-use rates.
Unlike canister related problems, vapor leaks could potentially emanate from points in the
system from the gas cap to vapor lines to the canister and engine. In some cases, the source(s) of
the "hot-soak" emission values measured in the PSHED could not be identified or isolated. In
these cases, it is reasonable to assume that these emissions arose from leaks from various
undetermined locations and sizes in the fuel and evaporative control systems. This may
especially be the case since measurements were made with vehicles and fuels in hot conditions
over a brief 15-minute period. The measured emission levels and the short measurement periods
reduce the probability that measured emissions arose from other processes such as permeation or
diurnal losses.
4-22
-------
Figure 4-13. Magnitude of PSHED Hot-soak Results by Model-Year Group and
Location of Vapor Source
100.000 -
31.323 -
3.162 -
5
o
S 0 316 :
Q 0.10D -
UJ
i
°- 0.032 -
0.010 -
T""^
1
—
Model Year Group
1
*
1
Pre-1696
tjj 1996+
1
1
,
> * 1
* i S
U_ fll
Plligeine
1
5 " jt "
1 f * 1
0.
<3
•
L
0-
1
9
? -e
'ill
' 1 [I
4.3.4 Assessment of Measurement Repeatability
In addition to sampling error, estimated above through estimation of confidence intervals,
it is important to consider the potential effects of measurement variability (from all sources) on
the distributions of elevated hot-soak emissions. In general, measurements for emissions
measurements tend to show a high degree of variability, both within and among vehicles. This
pattern holds for both exhaust and evaporative emissions.
As mentioned, this study was conducted as a survey with vehicles recruited from private
owners for a brief period following a maintenance inspection. When working with vehicles
recruited from the public in the I/M lane, it was not practical to take the time necessary to obtain
replicate measurements, as desirable as that outcome would have been.
It was thus not possible to obtain estimates of test-to-test variability during the project
itself. The best estimates of repeatability available can be obtained from the limited set of paired
PSHED and LSHED measurements presented and discussed in Appendix D. These
measurements were initially performed to assess the association between PSHED and LSHED
measurements, and were thus generally conducted in sequences of 1st PSHED, 1st LSHED, 2nd
4-23
-------
PSHED, 2n LSHED. Prior to conducting the sequence, each vehicle's canister was removed
from the vehicle and purged on a laboratory bench overnight, and then reloaded during a
consistent one-hour diurnal procedure. Prior to each SHED test, a uniform conditioning sequence
was performed, consisting of running for five minutes on the dynamometer at 55 mph, followed
by phase 1 of the FTP cycle run with the engine hot ("hot 505"). Thus, despite the question of
whether the paired measurements (1st PSHED, 2nd PSHED) can be interpreted as "true"
replicates, given the possibility of cumulative changes in vehicle conditioning during the test
sequence, these data remain the best estimates of repeatability available for the PSHED
procedure.
We used the paired measurements to derive estimates of measurement repeatability. We
performed a log-log regression of the second PSHED on the first. For this purpose we used only
tests performed in an "as received" condition, and excluded two tests for which the first PSHED
measurement was recorded as 0.0. One such vehicle, (HE-3555) was interpreted as showing a
steadily increasing leak condition which did not allow its measurements to be considered as
replicates.11 In the second vehicle (631-SWU), as well as in the first, the presence of zero values
was interpreted as reflecting errors in measurement or transcription that did not allow the pairs of
measurements to be considered as replicates, as was necessary for this analysis. In addition, the
use of logarithms precluded the use of zero values.
A scatter plot of the results used is shown in Figure 4-14. Fit results for the model are
shown in Table 4-13. The regression equation is logX2 = -0.00786 + 0.8801 logxi, where x\ and
X2 are the first and second PSHED measurements, respectively. The intercept is not significantly
different from 0.0 (p = 0.94), whereas the slope term is significantly different from 0.0 (p =
0.0002). However, as the slope term is not significantly different from 1.0 for this sample (p =
0.44), we conclude that the second PSHED is unbiased with respect to the first.
Based on the regression, we estimated the standard error of prediction and the width of a
90% prediction interval for individual vehicles. With the mean-square-error for the regression
designated as s2, the standard error of prediction is given by:
SC,,_,-A = Is
5(y-y)
1
n
Equation 4-5
where n is the number of vehicles measured, xp is the measured PSHED mass for which
the prediction is to be made, x-bar is the mean of the 1st PSHED measurements, and SSxx is the
sum of squares for the set of 1st PSHED measurements.
For the set of vehicles measured, the standard error of prediction (for log x2) ranged from
0.2866 to 0.3203. Because this parameter is fairly uniform in logarithmic terms, the prediction
interval is similarly uniform and we can translate the prediction interval in percentage terms as
an approximate range of -60% to +200%. We apply this range in an assessment of the effect of
measurement repeatability below.
11 The sequence of measurements for this vehicle, arranged as IP, 1L , 2P, 2L were 0.0, 4.7, 9.9 and 55.5 g/Qhr.
4-24
-------
Figure 4-14. Paired Portable-SHED results: 2nd Replicate vs. 1st Replicate
Si 100.0'
u
"a.
u
•u
0
01 n n •
1 U.U
at
n
^
s
u>
c
o
•2
fl>
u
o
0
D
a
Q
O
0
0 0
o
0
o
0.1
1.0 10.0
Hydrocarbon Mass (g): first replicate
100.0
Table 4-13. Model-Fitting Results for Regression of
log(2nd PSHED) on log(1st PSHED)
Source
Model
Error
Total1
d.f.
1
10
11
Sum of Squares
2.53821
0.75321
3.29142
Mean Square
2.53821
0.07532
F-statistic2
33.70
Pr>F
0.0002
Vehicles for which either of the paired measurements was recorded as 0.0 g were not
included in model fitting.
2 Adjusted r^ 0.7483.
Using the range suggested by the prediction interval, we addressed the effects of
measurement repeatability by re-estimating the fractions of "elevated" emissions for two
scenarios. The first, a "lower-bound" scenario, assumes that the measured values are higher than
those obtained in subsequent replicates. The second, an "upper-bound" scenario, assumes that
the measured values are lower than those for subsequent replicates.
For each scenario, the analysis assumes that three replicates were obtained for each
vehicle. One value is the measured value acquired during the project, and the two remaining
values are at the lower or upper limits of the prediction interval, for the lower-bound and upper-
bound scenarios, respectively. If the measured hydrocarbon mass for each vehicle is x, then the
values of the lower-bound replicates as assigned as 0.4x. Similarly the values of the upper-bound
replicates are assigned as 3x, or (1+2.0)x. In both cases, the "actual" emissions status of the
vehicle is taken as the geometric mean of the three replicates. For the lower-bound and upper-
bound scenarios, the "measurement" for each vehicle is thus = (x-0.4x-0.4x)13 and (x-Sx-Sx)13,
respectively. After assigning the replicate values and calculating geometric means, the fractions
4-25
-------
of elevated emissions are recalculated, using the adjusted PSHED results for each scenario.
Results are presented for two model-year groups, 1981-1995 and 1996-2003.
Table 4-14. Fractions of PSHED Values Exceeding Selected Hot-Soak Emission
Thresholds (based on weighted distributions)
Model
Year
Group
«veh
Parameter2
Fleet Fraction Exceeding
PSHED Hot-Soak Value (g/Qhr)
0.3 1.0
2.0
5.0
10
20 | 50
100
1981-1995
75
Upper bound
Mean
Lower bound
0.75
0.39
0.26
0.27
0.26
0.22
0.26
0.22
0.15
0.18
0.083
0.042
0.083
0.042
0.027
0.042
0.026
0.0037
0.017
0.004
0.0019
0.004
0.004
0.0
1996-2003
76
Upper bound
Mean
Lower bound
0.089
0.064
0.061
0.061
0.033
0.029
0.033
0.029
0.021
0.022
0.021
0.020
0.021
0.020
0.0
0.020
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Number of vehicles measured.
"Mean" = mean proportion, calculated as shown in Equation 4-2, "Upper bound" = estimate for upper-bound scenario;
"Lower bound" = estimate for lower-bound scenario.
Based on the scenarios presented, the results suggest that the leak frequencies are not
highly sensitive to assumptions of uncertainty due to measurement repeatability in the range of-
55% for the lower-bound scenario. For the 1996-2003 model-year group, estimated frequencies
for the 0.3 g/Qhr and 1.0 g/Qhr thresholds are 5% and 12% lower than the corresponding mean
values. For the 1981-1995 model-year group, sensitivities are somewhat higher, with lower-
bound frequencies for the 0.3 and 1.0 g/Qhr thresholds estimated as 33% and 15% lower than
mean values.
For the upper-bound scenario, sensitivities are somewhat higher in relation to
assumptions of uncertainty due to measurement repeatability in the range of+100%. For the
1996-2003 model-year group, estimated frequencies for the 0.3 and 1.0 g/Qhr thresholds are 39%
and 85% higher than mean proportions. For the 1981-1995 model-year group, the upper-bound
frequencies for the 0.3 and 1.0 g/Qhr thresholds are estimated as 92% and 4% higher than
corresponding means.
4-26
-------
5.0 Summary and Conclusions
The primary goal of the Ken Caryl project was to estimate distributions of hot-soak
emissions of a fleet of gasoline-fueled light-duty vehicles. The objective of this field study was
to measure hot-soak emissions using a quick and inexpensive procedure.
A number of strategies were used to obtain evaporative emissions data on 175 in-use
vehicles that were representative of the fleet entering the I/M station at a reasonable level of
effort and cost:
1. The population of vehicles accessed during the study was limited to the fleet
visiting one I/M station in Denver during the summer months. Classes of vehicles
measured included LDV, LDT1, and LDT2.
2. A random sample of vehicles was selected for measurement with "probability
proportional to the Index" of evaporative emissions (ppEI). The index was
calculated from the value of a remote-sensing measurement obtained as each
vehicle entered the I/M station. The sampling process used the index to improve
the efficiency with which vehicles with "elevated" emissions could be selected for
recruitment (as opposed to sampling the fleet fully at random). To achieve this
goal, vehicles with high index values sampled "with certainty" whereas those with
lower values were sampled at lower rates, from 6/100 to 30/100 vehicles.
3. A number of parameters that are known to affect the hot-soak emissions were not
controlled but were recorded: ambient temperature, barometric pressure, fuel tank
level, fuel metering technology, evaporative emissions control technology, and
the maintenance status of related vehicle systems.
4. The hot-soak emissions of participating vehicles were measured using the
"portable SHED" (PSHED) enclosure. The procedure used in the enclosure was
developed to mimic the hot-soak portion of the Federal Test Procedure in the field
in much less time and at lower cost. The PSHED results are assumed to serve as a
good surrogate for the rigorous hot-soak results obtained in a laboratory
environment.
5. Using the measurements obtained in the PSHED, we estimated distributions of
hot-soak emissions, for the entire sampled fleet and by model-year group,
assuming that model-year group acts as a surrogate for important changes in fuel-
system and emissions control technology. To obtain representative results in
relation to the fleet sampled, it was necessary to develop and apply two sets of
weights to represent the processes of sampling and differential participant
response by model-year group.
The project has confirmed earlier work by demonstrating the utility of a screening index
in reducing the level of effort and cost needed to estimate the prevalence of "elevated
evaporative emissions." Results show a reasonable degree of correspondence between values of
the index and corresponding hot-soak measurements. However, the relation between the index
5-1
-------
and the measurements shows variability, particularly at lower emission levels. Aside from the
high known variability in remote-sensing data, experimental results suggest that EI23 values are
influenced by vehicle speed and exhaust hydrocarbon emissions levels, as well as by running-
loss emission rates. To compensate for the potential effects of these influences, vehicle selection
was based on EI23 Bin rather than individual EI23 values, with several of the highest Bins
sampled with certainty. It is nonetheless possible that influences such as vehicle speed or exhaust
levels or other unknown effects influence erroneous class assignments. Such misclassifications
can be expected to lead to "clean" vehicles being sampled as "elevated" and "elevated" vehicles
as "clean," i.e., "false positives" and "false negatives" respectively.
However, while the presence of classification errors reduces the efficiency of the index in
guiding sampling, it does not impair the usefulness of this sample in estimating distributions of
hot-soak values. This conclusion holds because the probability with which each vehicle is
sampled determines its weight in the analysis, not the value of PSHED measurement obtained
after sampling and recruitment. Accordingly, a "false negative" receives the same (higher)
weight in the analysis as a "true negative" and a "false positive" receives the same (lower)
weight as a "true positive." Thus, if the index classifies vehicles accurately, it can greatly reduce
the effort and cost required to conduct inspections and measurements and to estimate the
prevalence of elevated evaporative emissions. However, if the index performs poorly it does not
guide sampling efficiently, resulting in a situation more similar to sampling fully at random.
Nonetheless, because the sampling probabilities for each measured vehicle are known, the
resulting set of measurements can still be used to estimate the prevalence of "elevated
evaporative emissions."
The analysis shows the value of model-year groups as a surrogate for fuel-system and
emissions-control technology. While the screening and sampling processes did not explicitly take
model year into account, we nonetheless analyzed the results by model-year group, treating each
group as an independent subsample of the whole fleet. It might have been preferable to have
stratified vehicles by model year at the screening step and prior to sampling, and to have applied
differing sets of sampling fractions by model-year group, as the utility of the index is expected to
decrease with improving emissions control. However, this refinement was not achieved for this
project, because it was not feasible to acquire model year when it would be needed to inform a
sampling determination immediately after vehicles passed the remote-sensing van.
The hot-soak results among model-year groups span about three orders of magnitude and
are consistent with the combined effects of evaporative emission control technologies and
vehicle age. Older model year groups had substantially higher estimated hot-soak values than
newer model year groups. All vehicles manufactured prior to 1981 (when measured at 29+ years
of age) are expected to have PSHEDs greater than 1.0 g/Qhr (which corresponds to a cumulative
leak of 0.020 inches in diameter, or the size of the smallest fuel/evaporative control system vapor
leak that OBD systems are required to detect). For vehicles manufactured between 1981 and
1995 (measured at 14+ years of age), 26% and 39% of vehicles are expected to exceed 1.0 and
0.30 g/Qhr, respectively (with the latter value corresponding to the hot-soak portion of the EPA
enhanced evaporative emission standard). Evaluation of an assumption that all measurements
were overestimated by 50% estimated that these fractions for these two thresholds would be
reduced to values of 22% and 26%, respectively. For vehicles manufactured between 1996 and
2003 (measured at 5-13 years of age), and employing both OBD systems and enhanced emission
5-2
-------
controls, corresponding fractions are 3.3% and 6.4%, respectively. As with the pre-1996 vehicles,
a similar assessment of uncertainty due to measurement variability estimates reduced fractions of
2.9% and 6.1%, respectively. Finally, no vehicles manufactured in 2004-2010 are expected to
have PSHEDs greater than 0.3 g/Qhr, although these conclusions are based on a relatively small
subset of 13 measured vehicles. As previously noted, eligible vehicles in EI23 Bins 4 and 5 for
MY 2004-2010 were sampled, but the owners of these vehicles elected not to participate in the
study. However, previous experimental work using vehicles in this model-year group acquired
from the in-use fleet found some vehicles to have leaks of various sizes [6].
Despite the quick and rudimentary nature of the inspection, it was often possible to
isolate vapor emissions to specific components of the fuel-delivery or emission-control systems.
Specific vapor sources were identified for 44% and 17% of all PSHED results in the pre-1996
and the 1996-2010 model-year groups, respectively. However, for the vehicles having PSHED
results > 0.3 g/Qhr, the fractions are higher, with vapor sources identified for 54% and 76% of
results in the pre-1996 and 1996-2010 model-year groups. Overall, 13 specific vapor sources
were isolated, with the most common being the fuel tank, fill pipe, and canister. These three
locations account for 66% of identified sources for all PSHED results. Results also show that
most identified vapor sources exceeded 0.3 g/Qhr, with 64% to 70% of sources exceeding this
threshold attributed to these three locations.
The distributions of hot-soak emissions during the summer estimated from the
measurements obtained at Ken Caryl station represent new data that is relevant to characterizing
evaporative emissions at the fleet level in other contexts. However, the specific limitations of the
study imply that the results cannot necessarily be generalized broadly without taking steps to
account for differences in conditions. The effects of ambient temperature, fuel volatility, and
barometric pressure need to be considered in generalizing these results.
However, taken together, the emission data and the mechanic's inspection information
suggest that the "hot-soak" emissions measured in this work occur as a result of either canister
breakthrough or leaks in the fuel and evaporative emission control systems of the vehicles
evaluated. Furthermore, in many cases, the measured rates exceeded the 0.3 g/Qhr value
expected for a hot-soak.
5-3
-------
5-4
-------
6.0 References
1. T.H. DeFries, J.H. Lindner, S. Kishan, C.F. Palacios, "Investigation of Techniques for
High Evaporative Emissions Vehicle Detection: Denver Summer 2008 Pilot Study at
Lipan Street Station," Version 4, submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
prepared by Eastern Research Group, EPA-091209, December 9, 2009.
2. E. Ellsworth, "Assessment of Light-duty Vehicle Evaporative Emission Control
Technology," US EPA, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control, Evap. 75-3.
3. S. Kishan, T.H. DeFries, R.F. Klausmeier, "CRC-Radian Evaporative Emissions Model:
EVAP 2.0, 1987 Annual Report," Report, CRC-880524, prepared for Coordinating
Research Council, May 24, 1988.
4. T.H. DeFries, S. Kishan, R.F. Klausmeier, "CRC-Radian Evaporative Emissions Model:
EVAP 2.0, 1988 Annual Report," Report, CRC-891229, prepared for Coordinating
Research Council, December 29, 1989.
5. T.H. DeFries, S. Kishan, R.F. Klausmeier, "CRC-Radian Evaporative Emissions Model:
Evaluation of Time and Driving Effects," Report, CRC-920504, prepared for
Coordinating Research Council, May 4, 1992.
6. CRC E-77 reports: Haskew, H., Liberty, T. (2008). "Vehicle Evaporative Emission
Mechanisms: A Pilot Study," CRC Project E-77; Haskew, H., Liberty, T. (2010).
"Enhanced Evaporative Emission Vehicles (CRC E-77-2)"; Haskew, H., Liberty, T.
(2010). "Evaporative Emissions from In-Use Vehicles: Test Fleet Expansion (CRC E-77-
2b)"; Haskew, H., Liberty, T. (2010). "Study to Determine Evaporative Emission
Breakdown, Including Permeation Effects and Diurnal Emissions Using E20 Fuels on
Aging Enhanced Evaporative Emissions Certified Vehicles," CRC E-77-2c.
7. H.M. Haskew, T.F. Liberty, D. McClement, "Fuel Permeation from Automotive
Systems," CRC Project No. E-65, prepared for California Air Resources Board and
Coordinating Research Council, prepared by Harold Haskew & Associates and
Automotive Testing Laboratories, September 2004.
8. D. Amlin, R. Carlisle, S. Kishan, R.F. Klausmeier, H. Haskew, "Evaporative Emissions
Impact of Smog Check," prepared for California Bureau of Automotive Repair, prepared
by California Bureau of Automotive Repair, Eastern Research Group, de la Torre
Klausmeier Consulting, Harold Haskew & Associates, September 15, 2000.
9. D. McClement, "Raw Fuel Leak Survey in I/M Lanes," prepared for American Petroleum
Institute and Coordinating Research Council, prepared by Automotive Testing
Laboratories, Mesa, Arizona, June 10, 1998.
10. L.C. Landman, "Evaporative Emissions of Gross Liquid Leakers in MOBILE6,"
M6.EVP.009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA420-R-01-024, April 2001.
6-1
-------
11. G.A. Bishop, J.R. Starkey, A. Ihlenfeldt, W.J. Williams, D.H. Stedman, "IR long-path
photometry: a remote sensing tool for automobile emissions," Analytical Chemistry,
61(10): 671A-677A.
12. C. Mazzoleni, H.D. Kuhns, H. Moosmuller, R.E. Keislar, P.W. Barber, N.F. Robinson,
J.G. Watson, D. Nikolic, "On-road vehicle particulate matter and gaseous emission
distributions in Las Vegas, Nevada, compared with other areas," Journal of the Air &
Waste Management Association, 54: 711-726, June, 2004.
13. G.A. Bishop, D.H. Stedman, "A decade of on-road emissions measurements,"
Environmental Science and Technology, 42(5):1651-1656, 2008.
14. H. J. Williamson, "Measures Useful for Identifying Vehicles with High Evaporative
Emissions, " CACI-081222, submitted to Eastern Research Group, prepared by CACI,
Austin, Texas, December 28, 2008.
15. J.H. Lindner, T.H. DeFries, "Evaluation of Portable SHED Characteristics," Version 2,
prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-120225, revised February 25,
2012.
16. J.M. Kemper, "Lab SHED / Portable SHED Comparison," presented at High Evap Field
Study Project Meeting, February 4, 2010, Denver, Colorado. Contact Jim Kemper at
CDPHE for detailed information on testing.
17. K. Linnet, "Estimation of the Linear Relationship Between the Measurements of Two
Methods with Proportional Errors," Statistics in Medicine, Volume 9, pages 1463-1473,
1990.
6-2
-------
Appendix A
Measurement of Exhaust and Evaporative Hydrocarbons
by Remote-Sensing
-------
-------
Some background on the operation of remote-sensing instruments and calculations
performed on raw remote-sensing measurements is useful for understanding the conditions under
which this technique might be capable of detecting running-loss emissions from vehicles. The
detailed calculations are specific to the instruments used in the Ken Caryl study; however, the
use of the optical data should, in general, apply to any remote-sensing instrument.
The pollutants in the exhaust plume emitted from the tailpipe of a vehicle are assumed to
be well mixed and are assumed to be released from only the tailpipe. It is also assumed that after
emission from the tailpipe, the HC, CO, NO, and CO2 components of the plume disperse into the
ambient air at the same rate.
When a vehicle drives past the remote-sensing instrument, the light beam passes through
a portion of the dispersing tailpipe plume. The instrument measures the attenuation of infrared
(TR) or ultraviolet (UV) light caused by the presence of the chemical species in the plume. For
each vehicle, the degree of attenuation is measured 50 times at intervals of 10 msec. The degree
of attenuation is the product of the concentration and the pathlength and therefore takes units of
ppm-cm for HC and NO and %-cm for CO and CO2. If the only source of the pollutants is the
tailpipe exhaust, and if the ambient air has no pollutants, then the ratios of attenuations of any
two pollutants will be constant for multiple readings taken in a vehicle's exhaust plume even
though the pollutant concentrations change as the plume disperses. Figure A-l shows example
time traces of the attenuations of HC, CO, NO, and CO2 as recorded by a remote-sensing
instrument for a specific set of experimental conditions [14]. The plot clearly shows that for this
case, which does not include evaporative emissions, the attenuations follow similar proportional
trends with time. That is, ignoring the different vertical scales, the time traces of all four
pollutants have very similar shapes.
However, the purpose of the technique is not to assess the temporal dependence of the
pollutant attenuations but rather to calculate the exhaust concentrations of measured pollutants at
the instant the vehicle passes the sensor. Estimating the pollutant exhaust concentrations requires
two steps. In the first step, the calculation applies an assumption that exhaust pollutant gases
disperse similarly from the common emission point. If this condition is obtained, then plots of
the attenuations of any pollutant against that for CO2 should produce a straight line passing
through the origin, assuming that background contamination in the ambient air is negligible.
Figure A-2 shows the HC, CO, and NO attenuations plotted against the CO2 attenuations for the
data shown in Figure A-l. The plot shows that the lines are quite straight with little scatter and
pass near the origin.
If ambient pollutants are present before the vehicle passes by, then the instrument will
also register attenuations from the background concentrations. Some instruments (such as the
ESP4600) attempt to correct for background concentrations by taking a measurement of all four
pollutants just before a vehicle passes the instrument. These "front bumper" background
attenuation values are subtracted from the raw tailpipe plume attenuation values to arrive at the
background-corrected attenuation values that are used to calculate the tailpipe emissions
concentrations. For example the set of attenuations shown in Figures A-l and A-2 incorporate
background corrections.
A-l
-------
Figure A-1. Attenuation Time Series for an Experimental Condition Simulating
Zero Running-Loss Emissions (0.00 scfh propane) and Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
c
o
••s
3
c
&
<
"c
ro
"o
Q_
*KJ
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Q
LLLL LLLL
LJ/-V /—„.„„_ ,-,~,\ / ^ /"v"\
HO (ppm-cm) / lUU
C*C\ /O/ n»^\
/V GO (%-cm)
/ \ //A CO2 (%-cm)
r \ \ f\ V
\ \ // \ ^~^~, M*^x^ /i-.i-.t-w-, n»^\ / ^ MM
\\ // V NUx (ppm-cm) / ILXJ
\\ // ^^^-^
\\ // "X
\\ // \\
\ // \\
\
\
\
\
V
^^^^~^ /-
~~^' — \^X/ -
r^---'"'^--,^^^ ,
r r r r r r r r
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4*
Time (msec)
Figure A-2. Pollutant vs. CO2 Attenuations for an Experimental Condition
Simulating Zero Running-Loss Emissions (0.00 scfh propane)
and Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
40 r
35
30
c 25
o
£ 20
| 15
"o
0.
10
Ot
-t- HC (ppm-cm)/ 100
i- CO (%-cm)
NOx (ppm-cm)/ 100
10 15 20 25 30 35
CO2 Attenuation ((%-cm)
40
45
A-2
-------
In estimating pollutant concentrations in the plume, relative to that for CO2, the
calculation makes use of the slope terms of the regressions of the attenuations. The slope values
obtained can differ, depending on whether the background correction is obtained by the
instrument and whether the intercepts are forced to zero.
After obtaining an attenuation slope in the first step, the second step in the calculation
uses combustion stoichiometry. The calculations assume a particular composition for gasoline
that contains carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in specific proportions, which when combusted with
air, will produce a corresponding mixture of HC, CO, NO, and CO2. The balanced chemical
equation for this reaction is then used to convert the relative pollutant concentrations estimated
from the attenuation slopes into estimates of absolute pollutant concentrations.
Now, consider the situation when evaporative emissions are present. Running-loss
emissions are predominantly hydrocarbons (some oxygenates may be present if the fuel contains
them) and can be emitted from the vehicle from multiple sources, with the exception of the
tailpipe. Accordingly, the characteristics of dispersion of running-loss emissions differ from
those for tailpipe emissions. Running-loss emissions can be emitted as vapor or as liquid. Since
the remote-sensing instrument can detect only vapor, liquid fuel must at least partially evaporate
before it can be detected. A vehicle's running-loss emissions plume will not necessarily
intermingle with its tailpipe plume. However, the running-loss emissions plume may pass
through the instrument's light beam at the same time that the tailpipe plume is passing through
the light beam. When a running-loss emissions plume intercepts the beam, it will cause the HC
attenuation to be larger than were it not present.
Figure A-3 shows a set of attenuation time series for a set of experimental conditions in
which both simulated exhaust and evaporative emissions were present. In this case, the shapes of
the time series for CO, NO, and CO2 are similar to each other, but the shape of the time series for
HC differs markedly. Comparison of the HC trend with the CO, NO, and CO2 trends indicates
that the HC attenuation has a large increase beginning at about 100 msec. This difference is more
obvious when the attenuations for the time series are plotted versus the CO2 attenuations as
shown in Figure A-4. Note that the trend lines shown in the figure are not forced through the
origin. While the CO versus CO2 and NO versus CO2 plots remain as straight lines, the HC
versus CO2 curve shows an increase in HC attenuation relative to CO2 attenuation and also
shows a non-linear behavior. The quantification of this behavior can be used to develop a
running-loss emissions index based on the remote-sensing measurements.
Attenuation measurements can be analyzed in diverse ways, leading to a variety of
potential candidate indices. Approaches considered include the use of the difference between
forcing and not forcing the intercepts of the HC vs. CO2 attenuation slopes to zero, correlation
coefficients between HC and CO2 attenuation, and principal-components analysis of attenuation
for HC, CO, NO and CO2. After these approaches were ruled out as showing limited utility,
attention shifted to examination of the sets of residuals for the regression of HC vs. CO2
attenuation. One option considered was to order the residuals as a time series and apply
techniques of signal processing, with the expectation that cases with high evaporative emissions
would show higher degrees of low-frequency content relative to cases with low evaporative
emissions. However, additional work showed that equal or superior predictive capabilities could
be obtained with simple statistics calculated from sets of residuals.
A-3
-------
Figure A-3. Attenuation Time Series for an Experimental Condition Simulating
Simultaneous Running-Loss Emissions (15 scfh propane) and Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
t!
CL
100
80
60
40
-20
HC (ppm-cm)/ 100
CO (%-cm)
CO2 (%-cm)
NOx (ppm-cm)/100
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (msec)
400
450
Figure A-4. Pollutant vs. CO2 Attenuations for an Experimental Condition
Simulating Simultaneous Running-Loss Emissions (15 scfh propane)
and Exhaust Emissions
(30 scfm of 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, 12.92% CO2, balance N2, dry)
100
oo
o
c 60
o
to
3
c
CO
£ 40
-I-J
I
o
Q_
K>
o
ta
o
-H-
i-
4r HC (ppm-cm) 7100
i- CO (%-cm)
-t- NOx (ppm-cm)/ 100
10 20 30 40
CO2 Attenuation ((%-cm)
-
50
60
A-4
-------
In pursuit of this vein, additional candidate indices were examined. One option, the
"trimmed mean residual" involved calculation of the mean of the absolute value of the residuals,
after excluding the two largest residuals (in absolute value). Another measure was the sum of the
absolute values of the residuals, after excluding the first four residuals. Experimentation with
statistics led to the index used in the Ken Caryl project. As the twenty-third such candidate
considered, it was labeled as "EI23." The calculation of EI23 is described below.
Calculation of EI23
The key concept for EI23 is that the degree of scatter around the regression trend for HC
vs. CC>2 attenuation is correlated with the running-loss rate. The concept is that the ninetieth
percentile residual (approximately) of the regression of the HC vs. CC>2 attenuations is a measure
of running-loss emissions. The largest residual is not used as it would be quite susceptible to
random variation. The average residual is not used because the running-loss plume might waft
through the light beam for just a fraction of the 500 msec sensing period. Both such events were
observed during experimental work.
The index is calculated from sets of HC and CO2 concentration-pathlength attenuation
values obtained by the instrument. Note that the concentration-pathlength measurements, also
sometimes known as optical depths, are standard quantities measured by many types of
spectrometers including remote sensing instruments. They are not unique or proprietary to
instruments produced by any particular manufacturer.
a) Acquire a set 50 HC and CC>2 measurements representing the passage of a vehicle by the
instrument. Number the observations 0 through 49.
b) Delete observations 0, 1,2, and 3.
c) Delete all observations flagged as "truncated plume." This label applies when the plume
is truncated by an object such as a following vehicle and no subsequent attenuation
information is available for the current plume.
d) Delete all observations flagged as "interrupted plume." This condition occurs when data
acquisition from the current plume is temporarily interrupted but additional information
is available from the plume after the interruption.
e) Count the number of observations (n) remaining after performing steps b), c), and d).
f) Perform a linear ordinary least squares regression of HC attenuation (ppm-cm) on CC>2
attenuation using the remaining n observations. Note that the regression is fit with a non-
zero intercept (aHc = fio+ /?i«co2, fio + 0) .
g) Calculate the residual for each of the n observations in the regression. The residual is
defined as the observed (or measured) HC minus the predicted (or fitted) HC.
h) Divide n (the number of remaining observations) by 10. Round the result to the nearest
whole number and call the result X.
i) Sort the n residuals from the largest to the smallest. (Note: -6 is smaller than -4)
j) Find the Xth largest residual. This value is taken as EI23.
Factors Influencing the Index
An evaluation of the performance of EI23 was made against a set of experimental
remote-sensing data for which "running-loss" emissions rates were simulated at known rates.
A-5
-------
The evaluation revealed that while EI23 could detect high running-loss rates, it was also affected
by vehicle speed, exhaust HC concentration, and random variation in the attenuation data. These
influences are explained as follows. As vehicle speed increases, the data points on the HC vs.
CO2 attenuation plot move toward the origin and the value of EI23 decreases because all
regression residuals are smaller. As the exhaust HC concentration increases, the signal from
running-loss HC is swamped by the signal from exhaust HC. Random variation in the attenuation
data can confound the running-loss "signal" in the data as running-loss emissions are assumed to
manifest as additional "noise."
Because of the dependences of EI23 on speed and exhaust HC concentration, a
transformation of EI23, called "EI23 Bin" was created in an attempt to reduce the influence of
these factors on vehicle selection. Appendix B provides a comparison of RSD evaporative
emissions index EI23 with known running-loss emission rates.
Development of a Strategy for Classifying Raw EI23 Values
In 2008, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE)
performed an experiment to examine the performance of EI23 at differing levels of simulated
exhaust and evaporative emissions. An ESP 4600 remote-sensing instrument was used to collect
a set of measurements for multiple passes of an RSD audit truck. The engine exhaust of the audit
truck was routed high over the cab so that it was less likely to be detected by the light beams.
The truck was equipped with a gas bottle system that could release (at 30 scfm) one of the
following three gas mixtures designed to simulate exhaust emissions:
• 0 ppmC3 HC, 0.0% CO, 0.0 ppm NO, and 15.07% CO2, dry
• 1100 ppmC3 HC, 3.0% CO, 500 ppm NO, and 12.92% CO2, dry
• 6015 ppmC3 HC, 5.0% CO, 250 ppm NO, and 11.55% CO2, dry
The audit truck was also equipped with a system to release 100% propane at metered
rates spanning a 100-fold range. These propane releases were used to simulate evaporative
running-loss emissions.
A total of 598 measurements, including sets of 50 10-msec concentrationxpathlength
photometric measurements for HC, CO, NO, and CO2, were collected when the audit truck was
driven at 12 mph. For each measurement, [HC] was calculated, using regressions of HC on CO2
attenuation, fit with zero and non-zero intercepts. The 50 photometric measurements of each pass
by the RSD instrument were used to calculate an EI23 value for each vehicle passing the sensor.
The three simulated exhaust mixtures and the six propane release rates created 18 test
conditions. Table A-l shows the number of EI23 measurements taken at each test condition and
statistics on the replicate EI23 measurements at each test condition.
The results in the table indicate that: 1) EI23 increases with propane release rate at
constant exhaust HC concentration, 2) EI23 increases with exhaust HC concentration at constant
propane release rate, and 3) the variance of the EI23 increases as the EI23 increases.
A-6
-------
Table A-1. Summary of Test Conditions and EI23 Results
(Audit Truck driven at 12 mph)
Test Condition
Propane
Release
Rate
(scfh)
0
0.15
0.45
1.5
4.5
15
Exhaust HC
Concentration
(ppmC3)
0
1100
6015
0
1100
6015
0
1100
6015
0
1100
6015
0
1100
6015
0
1100
6015
Number of
RSD
Measurements
100
100
98
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Evaporative Index (EI23)
Mean
90
83
189
110
139
177
104
152
234
145
200
260
888
782
692
1808
1432
1569
Standard
Deviation
24
21
84
32
80
67
34
94
137
58
111
125
499
593
449
1807
768
1567
Variance
591
453
7,054
997
6,383
4,539
1,131
8,855
18,885
3,408
12,227
15,530
248,619
351,627
201,862
3,265,574
590,145
2,454,228
To further explore the patterns evident in these results, the 598 12-mph EI23 values were
modeled against the propane release rate and the reported HC concentrations (calculated from
regressions with non-zero intercepts). Due to the large degree of variability across test conditions,
as shown in Table A-1, the EI23 values were modeled using a weighted ordinary least-squares
regression using the inverses of the variances in Table A-1 as weights. An initial regression
indicated that a two-way interaction between propane release rate and the HC concentration was
not significant. Therefore, the final regression included only terms for propane release rate and
HC concentration. The final regression gives predicted EI23 values according to:
EI23 = 78.536 + 79.005*PRR + 0.014181*EXHC
Equation A-1
where PRR = propane release rate (scfh), and
EXHC = exhaust HC concentration (ppmCs) as calculated by the remote-sensing
instrument from regression of the HC attenuation vs. CC>2 attenuation plot when the intercept is
not forced to zero.
For the field study at the Ken Caryl I/M station, some sort of estimate of the running-loss
emissions of each vehicle entering the station driveway was needed to determine if the vehicle
should be included in the PSHED evaporative emissions testing. Since the exhaust HC
concentration would be known as soon as a vehicle passed the RSD instrument, that measured
A-7
-------
exhaust HC concentration can be substituted into the Equation A-l to give the predicted EI23 as
a function of propane release rate. The field approach was to classify each vehicle's running-loss
emissions tendency by comparing each vehicle's measured EI23 value with seven EI23 reference
values that are associated with seven reference propane release rates. Classifying each vehicle
with seven EI23 reference values amounts to placing each vehicle's remote-sensing
measurement into one of eight "EI23 Bins." The discussion below shows how the 12-mph data
collected on the simulated running-loss and exhaust emissions on the audit truck were used to
define the EI23 Bins.
Figure A-7 shows the measured vs. predicted plot for the regression that produced
Equation A-l. The figure shows the large range of variances for the 18 test conditions. Because
the variances are large and change greatly depending on propane release rate (see Table A-l), for
the purposes of classifying the measured EI23 values, the EI23 values were transformed by
taking the natural log of the natural log, which makes the variability more nearly homogeneous
across the test conditions. This is demonstrated by Figure A-8, which also shows the linear trend
of the measured vs. predicted values of ln(ln(EI23)). An analysis of the ln(ln(EI23)) across the
18 test conditions indicates a standard deviation of 0.091.
The measured values of ln(ln(EI23)) were classified into EI23 Bins by dividing the full
range of values observed in the audit truck study into eight bins that move higher as the observed
exhaust HC concentration increases. The movement of the bins accounts for the dependence of
EI23 on exhaust HC concentration by using Equation A-l. According to Figure A-8, the range of
ln(ln(EI23)) values extends from a low point about 2 standard deviations below the estimated
value of ln(ln(EI23)) for a propane release rate of 0 scfh and an exhaust [HC] of 0 ppm (the
bottom of the cluster of green circles on the left of the plot) to a high point about 2 standard
deviations above the estimated value of ln(ln(EI23)) for a propane release rate of 15 scfh and an
exhaust [HC] of 6015 ppm (the top of the cluster of red dots on the right side of the plot). These
ln(ln(EI23)) values are estimated by the regression equation to be 1.291 and 2.157, respectively.
That range was divided into 8 bands that were used to assign each EI23 value to a bin that
corresponds to an approximate range of propane release rates, which are in turn estimates of
running-loss emission rates. The locations of the bin dividers move up as the exhaust [HC]
moves up. Figures A-9, A-10, and A-l 1 show where measured EI23 values for the audit truck
fall with respect to their EI23 Bins, for exhaust HC concentrations of 0, 1100, and 6015 ppmCs,
respectively. The In-ln transformation of EI23 values was used to allow the EI23 binning scheme
to be independent of running-loss emission rate and exhaust HC concentration without changing
the width of the bins.
A-8
-------
Figure A-7. Measured vs. Predicted EI23 for the 12-mph Audit Truck Tests
CO
csi
UJ
9000
8000
7000
6000'
5000
-------
Figure A-9. Comparison of Measured ln(ln(EI23)) with EI23 Bins for Propane
Release Rate Varied Across Its Range at Low Exhaust Emissions Concentrations
(0 ppmC3 HC, 0.0% CO, 0 ppm NO, 15.07% CO2)
2.3-
2.2
2.1-
^2.0-
co
CM 19-
LU
"S 1.8
3
in
ro * 7 .
0) "-I
^E"1 .6-
*t?
1.5-
1.4-
1.3
1 2
Bin 8
Bin 7
Bin 6
Bin 5
Bin 4 Oo \
Bin3 § ; $
°m, 1
Bin 2 f \
*k 0.15scfh \ A
Bin1 Oscfh °-45scfh 1.5scfh
0
%
° *>
1
o <9
Q3
QD (p
00
0
o
f
' ' ' k
Bin 2 t 1+ *w \
?+ <* K \
I \ A \
Bin1 4 °'15SCfh \ 1-5scfh
Oscfh °-45scfh
J /
\;
/
4.5scfh
0)
_c 1.6-
^H
1.5:
14
1.3
1.2-
1
1.5
1.6 1.7 1.8
ln(ln( Predicted EI23))
1.9
2,0
A-10
-------
Figure A-11. Comparison of Measured ln(ln(EI23)) with EI23 Bins for Propane
Release Rate Varied Across Its Range at High Exhaust Emissions Concentrations
(6015 ppmC3 HC, 5.0% CO, 250 ppm NO, 11.55% CO2)
2.3
2.2'
2.1 -
2.0
CO
CN 1 9
LJJ
CO
IE" re-
's"
1.5-
14
1,3
1 2-
Bin 8
Bin 7
Bin 6
Bin 5
Bin 4
Bin 3
Bin 2
Bin 1
1.4
•.
1' •
*•* t •
P 5
}' 1 i
x» i \ N
Oscfh T \ 1.5scfh
| 0.45scfh
0.15scfh
1.5 1.6 1.7 1
t
• _ «
f
• •
• —
t 1
»
t *
f
* /
4.5scfh /
15scfh
8 1.9 2.
ln(ln( Predicted EI23))
EI23 Bin: Classifying Raw EI23 Values
We have attempted to discount for exhaust HC concentration and other unknown
influences by transforming and assigning individual EI23 values to classes ("bins") before using
the index to guide sampling of individual vehicles. The classification is designed so as to be
independent of the observed exhaust HC concentration. The calculation of EI23 Bin is described
below.
a) For a set of attenuation values, calculate the estimated [HC] (ppmCs). For this purpose,
use a regression of HC on CO2 attenuation fit with a non-zero intercept.
b) For each measurement, calculate the lowest and highest expected values of ln(ln(EI23),
denoted as /
lhw = In [ln(78.536 + 79.005 * (0.0) + 0.014181 * EXHC)] - 2 * (0.091)
Ihtgh = In [ln(78.536 + 79.005 * (15.0) + 0.014181 * EXHC)] + 2 * (0.091)
Note that these values represent upper and lower bounds for EI23, predicted on basis of
experimental work with simulated evaporative and exhaust emissions, as described above. The
constant taking values of 0.0 and 15.0 represents release rates of propane, simulating evaporative
hydrocarbons, expressed in scfh. The coefficients are taken from the regression equation
presented above (Equation A-l), and the constant 0.091 represents one standard deviation of/
across all test conditions.
A-11
-------
c) Divide the range of expected / into eight increments. The size of the increment for each
measurements is given by:
. _ ''high ~ now
8
d) Then, for values ofy ranging from 1 to 7, calculate the values of EI23 that define a set of
bins for each measurement:
f) Now, assign the value of EI23 for the current measurement to the appropriate bin,
following the assigned logic:
else
else
else
else
else
else
else
if
if
if
if
if
if
if
if
EI23 < bi
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
i *
2 <
3 *
4 *
5 *
6 *
7 *
= EI23
= EI23
= EI23
= EI23
= EI23
= EI23
= EI23
-------
Appendix B
Comparison of RSD Evaporative Emissions Index EI23 with Known
Running-Loss Emission Rates
-------
-------
The EI23 evaporative emissions index was used to select vehicles as they entered the
driveway of the Ken Caryl I/M station for possible inclusion in this study's sample. In this
appendix selected data taken in the feasibility study is used to demonstrate the influence of
various factors on the value of EI23 to show that EI23 carries information about running-loss
emissions rate in the I/M station Driveway RSD measurement environment. In summary, EI23s
measured at the low speeds in the driveway (about 12 mph) can detect running-loss emissions
only under the best circumstances if the running-loss emission rate is above about 18 g/Qhr
(grams per 15 minutes). However, under some circumstances when running-loss rates are lower
than 18 g/Qhr, EI23 can still carry running-loss information, meaning that EI23 is associated
with the probability that running-losses are greater than zero. These findings mean that EI23 has
potential in the Ken Caryl study to be used as an evaporative emissions screening tool to enrich
the sample with elevated evaporative emissions vehicles.
The Ken Caryl I/M station fleet of interest in this study is made up of light-duty gasoline
vehicles with model years from 1961 to 2010. These vehicles will have a wide range of exhaust
emissions and running-loss emissions. They will drive past the Driveway RSD unit at relatively
low speeds near 12 mph, but the speeds will not be the same for all vehicles. The running-losses
of the vehicles may be generated from gasoline vapor or liquid gasoline and they may be
generated at one or more locations on the vehicle. The feasibility study data indicates that EI23
can be used in this study to detect elevated running-losses in many, but not all, situations.
The figures in this section present a portion of the feasibility data. Each plot in the figures
shows the cumulative distribution of 20 replicate EI23 values measured at each test condition.
These plots can be used to judge if a given running-loss rate is capable of being detected by a
single EI23 measurement. The commonly used standard for detection used for analytical
instruments is applied to the EI23 and running-loss situation: If the mean of the EI23 when
running-losses are present and the mean EI23 when running-losses are not present are different
by more than three standard deviations of the distribution of EI23s when running-losses are not
present, then the running-loss is detected. For the purposes of visually judging detection from the
plots in this section, the definition is approximated for this evaluation by: If the median of the
EI23 when running-losses are present is larger than the largest EI23 value of the 20 values in the
EI23 distribution when running-losses are not present, then the running-loss is detected.
Figure B-l shows some of the results for Test Vehicle 1, a 2008 Ford Escape, which had
an average exhaust HC concentration near 0 ppmC3. The EI23 values were measured at 12, 34,
and 55 mph and with under-hood propane release rates of 0, 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 scfh.
Typically, 20 replicate RSD measurements were made at each speed / propane release rate
combination. Each cumulative EI23 curve in each Figure B-l plot shows the range of EI23
values for each condition with the values sorted in ascending order. For example, the blue curve
in Figure B-la indicates that for 12 mph and 4.5 scfh propane the EI23 values ranged from about
250 to 1000 with a median of about 500. The repeatability for EI23s at this condition is therefore
about +200% and -50%. The black curve with the dots shows the location of the EI23
distribution when no propane was released (0 scfh propane). Thus, the difference in location of a
colored curve and the black curve shows the effect of the propane being released.
B-l
-------
Figure B-1. EI23 Distributions for 6 Propane Under-Hood Propane Release Rates
for Test Vehicle 1 (Exhaust HC = 0 ppmC3) at 3 Speeds
a) 12 mph
33
o
1.01
,- w 0.8-
ll
c I- 0.6:
o co
eo UJ 0.4-
CO
CM
LLJ
0.0
10
100
1000
10000
EI23 Threshold
b) 34 mph
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
c) 55 mph
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
Propane Release Rate (scfh) »••"• 0.00
1.50
0.15
4.50
0.45
15,00
B-2
-------
Using the definition of detection discussed earlier, Figure B-la, which is for 12 mph,
indicates that the upper three propane release rates (1.5, 4.5, and 15 scfh) are detected by EI23.
Note that in Figure B-la the median (y-axis = 0.5) of the green curve for 1.5 scfh is just larger
than the largest value of the 0 scfh curve (black dots). But the medians of the red and orange
curves for 0.15 and 0.45 scfh are within the range of the 0 scfh EI23 values. This behavior
suggests that at 12 mph, EI23 can distinguish propane release rates of 1.5 scfh or larger (18
g/Qhr or larger) from zero running-loss emissions. EI23 carries running-loss information for
release rates below 1.5 scfh since the red 0.15 scfh curve and the orange 0.45 scfh curve are
slightly above the black 0 scfh curve, but the noise in the EI23 values makes detection of
running-loss emissions unreliable for release rates below 1.5 scfh based on a single RSD
measurement for a vehicle. However, Figure B-la suggests that at release rates below 1.5 scfh,
EI23 may best be used as a screening test to increase the probability of selecting a vehicle that
has elevated running-loss emissions.
At 34 mph, Figure B-lb shows that 0.15 and 0.45 scfh propane are not distinguishable
from 0 scfh. Therefore, at those running-loss levels EI23 does not carry much running-loss
information and certainly cannot detect propane. Since the medians for the 1.5 scfh, 4.5 scfh, and
15 scfh curves are all above the largest 0 scfh EI23 value, these running-loss rates ate detectable
at 34 mph.
Similarly, Figure B-lc shows that at 55 mph the EI23 distributions for 0.15 scfh, 0.45
scfh, and 1.5 scfh are close to the same location as for 0 scfh, and therefore those running-loss
rates are not detected. The median for the blue curve for 4.5 scfh is not larger than the largest 0
scfh value, but the blue curve is substantially shifted with respect to the 0 scfh curve. In this
situation, running-losses are not able to be detected based on a single EI23 value. However,
because the blue curve is shifted with respect to the black curve, EI23 can be used to estimate the
probability that the running-loss is greater than 0 scfh. In contrast, the purple 15 scfh EI23
distribution is almost completely resolved from the black 0 scfh distribution, indicating that at 55
mph 15 scfh can be detected.
Taken altogether, the plots in Figure B-l show that as speed increases, the EI23
distributions for all non-zero propane release rates shift lower toward the EI23 distribution for 0
scfh propane. As the vehicle speed increases, EI23 becomes less able to detect the propane
releases and, for those low running-loss rates that cannot be detected, EI23 becomes less able to
estimate even the probability that the running-loss is greater than 0 scfh. However, since EI23
was used to select vehicles in the Ken Caryl study using EI23 at 12 mph in the station driveway,
the EI23 performance in the vicinity of 12 mph needs to be examined in more detail. The next
two paragraphs evaluate the effects of running-loss release point and exhaust HC concentration
while keeping speed constant at 12 mph.
Another area of testing in the feasibility study was the influence of the release point of
the propane on the vehicle. Figure B-2 shows the results for release location testing on Test
Vehicle 2, a 1992 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight at 12 mph. The spark plug wire on cylinder 5 was
disconnected to cause this vehicle to have an exhaust HC concentration of about 2000 ppmC3.
On this vehicle, propane was released at 4.5 scfh under the hood, at the top of the gas tank, and at
the fuel fill door. Comparison of the 4.5 scfh EI23 distributions in the figure show that while the
three locations produced shifts with respect to each other, all three locations were clearly
B-3
-------
distinguishable from the 0 scfh EI23 distributions. The EI23 could detect the running-loss
emissions in any of the three release locations.
Because the RSD instrument has a single HC detection channel, exhaust HC may
interfere with the detection of running-loss HC. The test results in Figure B-3 show this effect for
the audit truck. In these tests the audit truck had a simulated exhaust gas that contained CO, CC>2,
NO, and either 0, 1100, or 6015 ppmC3 propane, but no water vapor. The running-loss propane
release rate was either 0 or 4.5 scfh. The plots show that as the exhaust HC concentration
increases, the separation between the 0 scfh and the 4.5 scfh EI23 distributions gets smaller. The
plots indicate that this is caused by an increase in the EI23 values for the 0 scfh situation rather
than a decrease in the EI23 values for the 4.5 scfh situation. In any case, while the presence of
exhaust HC tends to reduce the running-loss signal as measured by EI23, EI23 is still able to
detect the running-losses when the exhaust HC is 0 or 1100 ppmC3. However, when the exhaust
HC is 6015 ppmC3, the detection of 4.5 scfh was just barely detectable.
In some situations running-losses occur by the direct release of liquid gasoline. The
feasibility study tested this situation at 12 mph by metering gasoline releases from a thin plastic
tubing so that drops could fall directly to the pavement without first hitting the vehicle or being
rolled over by the tires. When the vehicle was at rest, the drops of gasoline were confirmed to be
hitting the pavement. However, as the vehicle moves - even at 12 mph - the rate of gasoline
evaporation from the droplets is expected to be higher than when the vehicle is at rest. RSD can
detect HC only in the vapor phase; therefore, some evaporation of the gasoline is required for
liquid running-losses to be detected. This requirement for volatilization imposes a greater burden
on EI23 to detect liquid gasoline running-losses.
Figure B-4 shows the results for liquid gasoline releases at 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mL/s
from the front bumper and the rear bumper with the vehicle traveling at 12 mph. Test Vehicle 7
was a 2001 Chevrolet Blazer with an average exhaust HC concentration near 0 ppmC3. The EI23
distributions in Figure B-4a and B-4b show increasing EI23 distributions as the gasoline release
rate increases. Figure B-4a shows that 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mL/s liquid gasoline releases from the front
bumper were detected by EI23. The 0.05 mL/s rate was border-line detected. However, Figure B-
4b shows that only 0.5 and 1 mL/s liquid gasoline releases from the rear bumper were detected.
The distributions of the EI23 values for the rear bumper are lower than those for the front
bumper, presumably because releases from the front bumper have more time to evaporate than
releases from the back bumper. The 0.1 mL/s release rate EI23 distributions are both
distinguishable from their 0 mL/s EI23 distributions and therefore under those conditions EI23
carries some running-loss information. A 0.1 mL/s gasoline release rate is approximately equal
to 68 grams of gasoline per 15 minutes.
Finally, Figure B-5 shows the same type of liquid gasoline testing on Test Vehicle 6,
which was a mal-maintained 1990 Chevrolet Lumina with an exhaust HC concentration of about
19,000 ppmC3. In this situation, which was similar to but more extreme than the high exhaust
HC concentration results shown in Figure B-3c, the high exhaust HC concentration hindered the
EI23's ability to clearly detect the liquid gasoline releases. Nevertheless, the curves in the figures
show some ability to estimate the probability that the running-loss emissions were larger than 0
scfh from the front and rear bumpers of the vehicle.
B-4
-------
Figure B-2. EI23 Distributions for 2 Propane Release Rates
for Test Vehicle 2 (Exhaust HC = 2000 ppmC3) at 12 mph at 3 Locations
a) Under Hood
|0 1.0f
o
S „ o.ei
^ ™
CO LU 04
LL A
CO
-------
Figure B-3. EI23 Distributions for 2 Propane Fuel-Fill-Door Propane Release Rates
for Audit Truck at 12 mph for 3 Exhaust HC Concentrations
a) 0 ppmC3
o co
1.0-
0.6-
o —
co ui 04
u. A
LU
o.o
10
-
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
b) 1100 ppmC3
•a to-"
o
.c
£ o> 0.8
> £
TO LU 04
LU A
co
CNj 0.2-
LU
00
10
»
\
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
c) 6015 ppmC3
;g rof
o
£ $ 0.8
I | °^
ro LU 04
LL A
0.2
LU
0.0 IT
10
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
Propane Release Rate (scfh) »-»-» oo
B-6
-------
Figure B-4. EI23 Distributions for 5 Liquid Gasoline Release Rates
for Test Vehicle 7 (Exhaust HC = 0 ppmC3) at 12 mph at 2 Locations
a) Front Bumper
LU
b) Rear Bumper
ig 1.0:
o
.c
£ m 0.8
Is06
§ uj 04
LL A
CO
CN 02
LU
0.0
10
100
1000
10000
EI23 Threshold
100
1000
10000
EI23 Threshold
Gasoline Release Rate (mils)
0.00
005
010
050
1.00
B-7
-------
Figure B-5. EI23 Distributions for 5 Liquid Gasoline Release Rates
for Test Vehicle 6 (Exhaust HC = 19000 ppmC3) at 12 mph at 2 Locations
a) Left Front Wheel
o>
1.0 -
0.8
i «°6^
•s ^
CD 111 04
U- A
802J
LU
o.o I
10
b) Rear Bumper
o co
'•G ^
co 111 0.4
LL A
LU
00
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
100 1000
EI23 Threshold
10000
Gasoline Release Rate (mUs) »-»-• o.OO
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
B-8
-------
Overall, the feasibility testing results indicate that EI23 can detect running-loss emissions
on vehicles traveling at about 12 mph if the conditions are favorable.
1. EI23 can distinguish propane release rates of 1.5 scfh or larger (18 grams per 15
minutes or larger) from zero running-loss emissions.
2. At release rates below 1.5 scfh propane, EI23 may be used as a screening test to
select vehicles with a higher probability of having elevated running-loss
emissions.
3. EI23 can detect running-losses from different release locations on the vehicle.
4. EI23 can detect liquid gasoline releases but with a poorer detection limit than for
vapor releases.
5. Exhaust HC reduces EI23's sensitivity to running-losses, but the effect is small
for exhaust HC concentrations from 0 to 6000 ppmC3, which is the dominant
range of exhaust HC concentrations for fleet vehicles.
B-9
-------
B-10
-------
Appendix C
Sample Blank Data Packet
-------
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
Packet ID
(give to all RSD vans)
Selection VDF Bin
(get from Selection RSD van)
Recruiter Contact Date
Recruiter Contact Time
Make Model
MY Color
Y N Full Time or All Wheel Drive or Traction Control
Metal Paper
Rear Plate State
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H •
Front Plate State Metai paper
Other Plate State Metai paper
Participant: Yes No
Participant First Name
Ken Caryl IM Station
10727 Centennial Road
Littleton, Colorado 80127
c-i
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
Recruiter First Contact
Packet ID:
Are you the owner of this vehicle?
Is this a Fleet Vehicle?
Is this your normal, every-day car?
(no cream puffs, collector's cars, mechanics specials)
Your vehicle is eligible for this study. Are you
interested in hearing about the project?
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
I,
(printed name)
., would like to participate in this study.
I have received $
to participate in this project.
Signature
Date
C-2
-------
SOP011_DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
Driver Questionnaire
1. On average, approximately how many miles is this vehicle driven
annually (12,000 is average)?
(a)< 8,000 (b) 8,000-12,000 (c)12,000-24,000 (d) > 24,000 (e) Don't know
2. How long have you owned your car? months / years OR
We got this vehicle on (month/year date) Don't know
3. At night, do you park this vehicle:
(a) Inside a garage (b) Outside/Carport (c) Both
4. When was the last time you fueled your vehicle?
(a) Last 24 hours (b) 1 to 2 days ago (c) 3 to 5 days ago
(d) Greater than 5 days ago (e) Don't know
5. Does this vehicle get regular, routine maintenance?
(a) Yes (b) No (c) Don't know
6. When was the last time you had each of the listed services performed on
this vehicle?
a b c d e f
Oil Change: 0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months > 12 months Don't Know Never
Tune Up: 0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months > 12 months Don't Know Never
NewGasCap: 0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months > 12 months Don't Know Never
Fuel System: 0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months > 12 months Don't Know Never
MajEngWrk: 0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months > 12 months Don't Know Never
7. Have you ever noticed a gasoline smell around your vehicle? Yes No
If yes, please describe the circumstance.
If yes, have you done anything to fix it?
8. Has the vehicle ever been in an accident severe enough that repairs had
to be made before it could be operated again? Yes No Don't Know
C-3
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
Packet ID:
Rental Car Checkout
Attach Photocopy of Driver's License (front and back) here.
Which rental vehicle given out:
When owner will return: Date:
Time:
Circle Primary Phone Number to Contact:
Home (_
Work
Cell
Visual Pre-lnspection of Owner's Vehicle
D - Dent
S - Scratch
M - Missing
PASSENGER S SIDE
I
C-4
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
IM Inspection Results and Copy of Vehicle Inspection Report
(staple copy of report here)
Gas cap result: Pass Fail N/A
C-5
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
Packet ID:
Modified California Method
Date:
Verify that Gas Cap is on and is tight. Initials:
Record 2 warm-up IM240 times:
Engine warm after driving and still running
(Check one descriptor for each Location and each of the 2 methods.)
Location
Gas Cap
Underbody fuel lines
Bottom of fuel pump
Fuel pump to metering
In-line fuel filter
Fuel rail + connectors
All fuel-injectors
Ground under vehicle
Visual Liquid
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
Sniffer
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Engine off
(Check one descriptor for each Location and each of the 2 methods.)
Location
Fuel fill pipe to tank joint
Tank: rust,straps, damage
Non-OEM installations
Visual Liquid
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
0 m S G NP
Sniffer
Y N NP
Y N NP
Y N NP
Detailed comments:
Descriptors:
0 =No visual evidence of liquid fuel leaks
m =Minor signs of fuel (staining, damp spots), wicking<1"
S =Significant leaks with single drops of fuel from vehicle to the ground, wicking>1"
G =Gross leaks, regular flow of drops to the ground, or a large pool of fuel, wicking>1"
NP =Not Performed
Y =Positive Sniffer Response
N =Negative Sniffer Response
C-6
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
Vehicle Information Sheet
Packet ID:
Photos (after shooting, verify that photo is in focus):
1. Front Quarter View with License Plate visible and readable
(with white board and Packet ID#)
2. Vehicle Emission Control Info label close-up photo
(get engine family, evap family, certification year)
3. VIN close-up photo (windshield or door frame)
4. Rear View with License Plate visible and readable
(with white board and Packet ID#)
Under Hood:
Fuel Metering Type: Carbureted Fuel-Injected
VECI Certification Year:
VECI Engine Family:
VECI Evap Family:
VIN (print very carefully, e.g. V, U, S, 5, 7, Y, X, 9, 4)
Interior:
Transmission Type:
Fuel Level (circle one)
Odometer Reading
Manual
Automatic
3/4
1/2
1/4
Odometer Digit Resolution (circle one) 5 6
C-7
-------
SOP011_DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
RSD Testing Date:
55 mph RSD #2 (Highway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
55 mph RSD #3 (Highway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
Date:
34 mph RSD #4 (Highway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
34 mph RSD #5 (Highway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
Date:
12 mph RSD #6 (Driveway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
12 mph RSD #7 (Driveway). VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
Optional RSD Testing Date:
mph Drive past RSD #8. VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
mph Drive past RSD #9. VDF: Time:
(Get VDF from RSD operator by radio)
C-8
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
PSHED Testing
Label FID file as: S
Packet ID:
.CSV
Initial PSHED
S ( PacketID ) (a) (m) (d d) .csv
Time HC (ppmC) T (°F)
baro
("Hg)
Put vehicle in PSHED and seal the door.
Door Sealed
Final PSHED
(@900s)
Remove vehicle from PSHED.
Total mass of HC at end of the test (grams).
Optional PSHED Testing
Label FID file as: S
.CSV
Initial PSHED
S( PacketID ) (a) (m) (d d) .csv
Time HC (ppmC) T (°F)
baro
("Hg)
Put vehicle in PSHED and seal the door.
Door Sealed
Final PSHED
(@900s)
Remove vehicle from PSHED.
Total mass of HC at end of the test (grams).
C-9
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
Data Packet QC Check
As project on-site manager, I have carefully examined every data
blank in this data packet and certify that all data entries have been
made and are legible and understandable.
(initials)
C-10
-------
SOP011_DataPacket-090707.doc Packet ID:
Evap Repairs and Follow-Up Testing
Shop:
Phone:
Date and time picked up:
Name of person picking up vehicle:
Signature:
Vehicle return date and time:
Name of person receiving:
Date and time of return:
Attach all repair order forms
Total labor cost: $_
Total parts cost: $_
Record 2 warm-up IM240 times:
12 mph RSD Date: Time: VDF:
12 mph RSD Date: Time: VDF:
Perform SHED test (results on next page)
Notify owner vehicle ready for pickup
Date and time:
Customer pickup date and time:.
Name of person receiving:
Signature:
C-ll
-------
SOP011 DataPacket-090707.doc
After-Repair PSHED Testing
Label FID file as: S
Packet ID:
.CSV
Initial PSHED
S ( PacketID ) (a) (m) (d d) .csv
Time HC (ppmC) T (°F)
baro
("Hg)
Put vehicle in PSHED and seal the door.
Door Sealed
Final PSHED
(@900s)
Remove vehicle from PSHED.
Total mass of HC at end of the test (grams).
Optional After-Repair PSHED Testing
Label FID file as: S
.CSV
S ( PacketID ) (a) (m) (d d) .csv
Time HC (ppmC) T (°F)
Pbaro ("Hg)
Initial PSHED
Door Sealed
Final PSHED
(@900s)
in PSHED and seal the door.
jhicle from PSHED.
C at end of the test (grams)
C-12
-------
Appendix D
Comparison of PSHED and LSHED
-------
-------
From June through October 2009, the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment (CDPHE) undertook testing to compare the hot-soak emissions measurements in a
portable SHED (PSHED) and in its laboratory SHED (LSHED) [16]. During this period,
CDPHE measured evaporative emissions on 15 vehicles. The results of this testing are shown in
Table D-l. The table shows the results of hot-soak measurements and heat-build (diurnal
evaporative emissions) measurements. The heat-build measurements were only performed in the
LSHED and therefore will not be discussed here but are shown in the table for completeness.
The objective of the testing was to compare hot-soak results from LSHED and PSHED
tests in back-to-back testing using the same procedures for each. To make the results obtained
from both enclosures comparable, tests in both the PSHED and LSHED were conducted as hot-
soaks of 15 minutes duration. The results reported in Table D-l are for 15 minutes both for the
PSHED and LSHED.
The LSHED used for the testing is located at CDPHE's Aurora test facility near Denver,
Colorado. The PSHED was also set up at the Aurora Facility. As in the testing at Ken Caryl
Station, the PSHED used at Aurora consisted of a 10 x 20 x 8 foot enclosure, which was sealed
using sheet plastic and duct tape. The details and performance of the PSHED enclosure have
been discussed earlier [15]. Hydrocarbon concentrations inside the PSHED were measured using
a lab-grade flame ionization detector analytical system with a 10 point calibration.
Colorado has a program to test and repair vehicles identified using its on-going on-road
RSD measurement program in the Denver metropolitan area. Vehicles with elevated RSD values
are required to bring their vehicles to CDPHE for tailpipe testing and visual inspection. A subset
of these vehicles was selected for the LSHED/PSHED comparison test. Specifically, vehicles
that initially passed an exhaust emissions test (on the EVI240 cycle), but which were identified as
potential "high evaporative emitters," were sent to LSHED/PSHED comparison testing. Vehicles
were identified as candidates if they failed the intrusive pressure test, produced a strong odor or
visible leak, or had OBD evaporative codes.
For the LSHED/PSHED comparison testing, the following test sequence was used. The
vehicle was temperature stabilized overnight while its evaporative emissions canister was bench
purged. The next day, with the purged canister back in the vehicle, the vehicle underwent a one-
hour diurnal test in the LSHED which loaded the canister using a consistent procedure. Next, the
vehicle was conditioned for the first SHED test. The conditioning involved driving for five
minutes at 55 mph on the dynamometer and then driving the speed trace for the first phase of the
FTP cycle (although with the engine hot, i.e., "Hot505"). This same conditioning sequence was
used prior to each LSHED or PSHED test.
Table D-l shows the sequence of testing for each vehicle according to the test date and
test time. The table shows that this sequence was always performed: PSHED, LSHED, PSHED,
LSHED. Most vehicles received four SHED tests made up of two PSHED tests and two LSHED
tests with the sequence given by the column named CDPHE Test ID: IP, 1L, 2P, 2L. In most
cases the vehicles received the PSHED and LSHED tests in their as-received condition, but in a
few cases they were also tested after repair.
D-l
-------
In the analysis in this section the back-to-back measurements made by the PSHED will
be compared with those made by the LSHED. In addition, the repeatability of duplicate PSHED
measurements and the repeatability of LSHED measurements will be examined. While the
"back-to-back" SHED measurements follow each other as closely as possible, those
measurements were not made simultaneously. Accordingly, the state of the vehicle and its
evaporative emissions control system may be different for any pair of measurements in spite of
the conditioning procedure. For example, in the test sequence IP, 1L, 2P, 2L, the IP and 2P are
nominally replicates of each other. However, there may be uncontrolled differences in vehicle
condition between IP and 2P due to factors such as cumulative conditioning, canister purging,
etc. The influence of such differences in vehicle state could contribute to the observed
differences in the measured SHED hot-soak values.
Comparison of PSHED hot-soaks with LSHED hot-soaks - The data in Table D-l
contains 33 paired PSHED and LSHED measurements. For the purposes of this analysis, pairing
was assigned between successive tests on the same vehicle. Thus, IP is paired with 1L, 2P with
2L, 3P with 3L, etc. However, in every instance the LSHED measurement follows the PSHED
measurement and, therefore, time effects may influence comparisons between the PSHED and
LSHED results.
D-2
-------
Table D-1. CDPHE Data Comparing LSHED and PSHED 15-Minute Hot-Soak Results
Vehicle
ID
HE-2279
HE-2969
TTT7 -JHOI
Year
1994
1995
i oon
Make
Ford
Saturn
Model
Ranger
SL2
VINStem
(digits 1 to 8, 10, 11)
1FTCR15X.RP
1G8ZJ527 SZ
1 C^rA A W-^zTNT T A
Test
Date
6/16/09
6/16/09
6/16/09
6/16/09
6/16/09
6/18/09
6/18/09
6/18/09
6/18/09
6/18/09
6/23/09
6/24/09
6/24/09
6/24/09
6/24/09
6/25/09
6/25/09
6/25/09
6/25/09
6/25/09
6/26/09
6/30/09
6/30/09
6/30/09
6/30/09
6/30/09
7/1/09
Test
Time
(end)
10:30:01
13:47:34
14:37:17
16:00:15
16:31:37
9:49:39
12:39:27
13:26:51
14:06:30
14:47:49
15:35:26
9:50:02
10:29:12
11:05:21
11:58:39
9:28:49
11:26:34
12:05:00
12:51:32
13:42:11
11:35:54
9:15:52
12:40:54
13:14:48
13:50:42
14:26:06
13:48:27
Odometer
96761
96769
96778
96794
96798
96798
96805
96812
96820
96827
219834
219841
219848
219855
219862
219882
219869
219875
219881
219888
219888
245472
245707
245715
245723
245730
2454731
CDPHE
Test ID
HB(HBl)
IP
1L
2P
2L
3L(HB2)
3P
3L
4P
4L
IL(HBl)
IP
1L
2P
2L
4L(HB2)
3P
3L
4P
4L
7L(HB3)
IL(HBl)
IP
1L
2P
2L
4L(HB2)
SHED
Used
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Test
Type
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Evap
Emissions
fe/Qhr)
28.300
5.997
12.257
1.839
3.094
0.846
0.441
5.899
6.783
10.244
18.561
1.073
1.131
0.888
0.219
13.590
0.163
0.242
0.280
0.242
0.678
29.516
3.502
7.721
2.611
6.919
3.190
CDPHE
Comments
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
Correlation after
I/M240 & preps
Hot- soak
Correlation
Hot- soak
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
After repair +
auxiliary
canister
After repair +
auxiliary
canister
After repair +
auxiliary
canister
After repair +
auxiliary
canister
After repair
new canister
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
D-3
-------
Table D-1. CDPHE Data Comparing LSHED and PSHED 15-Minute Hot-Soak Results (Continued)
Vehicle
ID
f-Q\
W
TTT7 -2CCC
TTT7 '30^'5
Year
1996
1 QQ^,
1 QQ/1
Make
Honda
T?r\rr\
Model
Passport
onnQin
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 8, 10, 11)
4S6CM58V.T4
i r1"? A r^/iM P^,
1 TTTTYP 1 ^ V QP
V^TYF^QTsJ T")
TTORr' 1 Ol^ TO
1 TTA/rnTT^zlV PIT
Test
Date
7/15/09
7/15/09
7/15/09
7/15/09
7/15/09
7/21/09
7/21/09
7/21/09
7/21/09
7/21/09
7/23/09
8/18/09
8/18/09
8/18/09
8/18/09
8/18/09
8/20/09
8/26/09
8/26/09
8/26/09
8/26/09
8/26/09
8/31/09
9/1/09
9/1/09
9/1/09
9/1/09
9/1/09
9/10/09
9/22/09
9/22/09
9/22/09
9/22/09
9/22/09
9/24/09
Test
Time
(end)
9:56:27
10:52:19
11:26:08
13:46:53
14:20:46
9:29:04
10:22:01
10:55:35
11:26:58
12:01:19
9:39:54
9:23:45
9:59:16
10:31:09
11:01:23
11:36:37
9:43:52
9:14:21
13:56:16
14:30:24
15:01:12
15:37:01
14:32:33
11:01:26
13:49:59
14:27:17
15:03:00
15:36:51
9:59:35
9:51:56
10:39:24
11:01:25
14:16:18
14:43:11
10:12:57
Odometer
181810
181817
181826
181831
181844
95439
95445
95450
95454
95462
95476
163650
163657
163664
163671
163678
163682
193145
193149
193156
193161
193167
193145
248058
248065
248074
248080
248090
248095
284456
284462
284469
284477
284484
0
CDPHE
Test ID
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
SHED
Used
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Test
Type
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Evap
Emissions
(g)
40.319
3.148
3.982
4.472
4.632
32.159
1.459
3.713
3.258
5.736
0.210
10.090
2.999
5.429
6.979
10.265
0.475
93.708
0.000
4.659
9.945
55.507
1.406
7.278
0.000
0.041
0.069
0.041
0.039
0.978
0.369
0.614
0.413
1.033
1.017
CDPHE
Comments
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
Junker Con-
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
D-4
-------
Table D-1. CDPHE Data Comparing LSHED and PSHED 15-Minute Hot-Soak Results (Continued)
Vehicle
ID
HE-3649
XXX3400
TTT7 -2-2 CO
HE-4006
J/UZ
Year
1987
1992
1 QQ/1
1996
ivvz
Make
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Oldsmobile
Model
Thunderbird
Caravan
Ranger
Eighty Eight
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 8, 10, 11)
1FABP64W.HH
2P4GH253.NR
zlA/DTTVI 1 W T?Fi
1 r^T^Q^OV T?TT
1FTCR14U.TP
Test
Date
9/23/09
9/23/09
9/23/09
9/23/09
9/23/09
7/14/09
7/14/09
7/14/09
7/14/09
7/14/09
8/12/09
8/13/09
8/13/09
8/13/09
8/13/09
8/17/09
8/25/09
8/25/09
8/25/09
8/26/09
8/26/09
9/2/09
9/16/09
9/16/09
9/16/09
9/16/09
9/16/09
6/8/09
6/11/09
6/11/09
Test
Time
(end)
9:40:27
10:29:36
11:05:37
13:29:12
14:05:29
10:28:00
13:47:44
14:25:34
15:11:56
15:46:01
8:39:45
9:29:56
9:53:06
10:24:50
11:00:02
9:54:40
11:45:56
14:21:11
14:55:05
11:25:01
12:03:27
9:59:28
9:22:26
10:15:05
10:40:24
13:34:31
13:59:37
15:42:33
8:10:01
10:02:42
Odometer
118616
118622
118629
118634
118641
209454
209462
209468
209475
209484
217852
217859
217866
217872
217879
218292
143333
144715
144720
144726
144731
144740
96363
96370
96376
96382
96387
168568
168594
168602
CDPHE
Test ID
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
HB2
HB1
IP
1L
2P
2L
IL(HBl)
IP
2L(1L)
SHED
Used
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Portable
Lab
Lab
Portable
Lab
Test
Type
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
HotSoak
Heat Build
HotSoak
HotSoak
Evap
Emissions
(g)
90.936
0.926
1.348
0.733
1.621
40.261
26.671
12.655
10.721
3.651
74.551
3.814
5.900
3.122
10.398
0.213
19.588
9.469
29.125
10.450
18.244
3.091
27.520
0.419
0.396
0.210
0.306
0.144
0.140
0.172
CDPHE
Comments
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
After repair
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received
As received -
retest
As received
As received
D-5
-------
Figure D-l shows a plot of the PSHED versus LSHED measurements on a log-log scale.
Logarithmic scales provide an advantage when viewing the set of measurements, which covers
three orders of magnitude. In addition, the scatter of the data points in the plot near the parity line
indicate that the variability of the PSHED measurements on these vehicles appears to be better
described by a constant relative variability than by a constant absolute variability. The plot
indicates a tendency for the PSHED values to be lower than the LSHED values since more points
are below the parity line than above. This behavior could arise either because the LSHED
measurements always occur after the PSHED measurements in the pairs or because of a real
difference in the PSHED measurements relative to LSHED measurements.
Figure D-1. PSHED vs LSHED Hot-Soaks (LSHED follows PSHED)
100.00-
10.00
Q
LU
C/)
Q-
1.00-
010
0.01-
0.01
0.10
1.00
LSHED (g/Qhr)
10.00
100.00
D-6
-------
To determine whether the apparent difference in PSHED versus LSHED values in Figure
D-l arises from a bias between the PSHED and LSHED tests or whether the difference reflects
an order effect, the LSHED and PSHED data values are paired in a different way. For this
analysis, the values for each vehicle are paired such that the LSHED is tested before the PSHED
measurement. For example, the ILs are paired with the 2Ps. When this new repairing of the data
is plotted, the result is Figure D-2. This plot uses the same scales as Figure D-l, but note that the
number of available pairs is reduced by approximately half. The plot shows that as in Figure D-l,
there is a tendency for the PSHEDs to have lower values than the LSHEDs even though, in this
case, the LSHED preceded the PSHED test. When considered together, Figures D-l and D-2
show that the differences between LSHED and PSHED measurements in this dataset are not
caused by the order of the LSHED and PSHED tests but instead reflect a bias between the
LSHED and PSHED measurements. Specifically, the PSHED values tend to be smaller than the
LSHED values for the same vehicle.
Figure D-2. PSHED vs LSHED Hot-Soaks (LSHED proceeds PSHED)
10000-
1000
o
Q 100
LU
I
0.10
0.01
o
001
0.10
1 00
LSHED (g/Qhr)
1000
10000
If the two datasets in Figures D-l and D-2 are combined in one plot, the result is Figure
D-3. The 38 data points in the plot show the overall tendency of the PSHED to produce lower
values with respect to the LSHED when all of the data is considered together.
D-7
-------
Figure D-3. PSHED vs LSHED Hot-Soaks
100.00-
0,01
0.01
0.10
too
LSHED (g/Qhr)
10.00
10000
PSHED and LSHED hot-soak emission variability - The analysis in the previous
discussion demonstrated that the PSHED measurements tended to produce hot-soak values
somewhat lower than LSHED measurements as shown in Figure D-3. However, that figure also
showed a large scatter of the individual data points. In this discussion, the degree of scatter
produced by replicate SHED measurements is examined.
Figures D-4 and D-5 show plots of replicate PSHED and LSHED measurements,
respectively. For both plots, the horizontal axis is the first SHED measurement, for example, IP,
and the vertical axis is the second SHED measurement, for example, 2P. In all cases, the first and
second SHED measurements are separated by a period of time during which a SHED
measurement of the other type was performed. The sequence of tests for each vehicle can be seen
in Table D-l.
Both Figures D-4 and D-5 show a similar scatter of points about the parity line for both
duplicate PSHED tests and duplicate LSHED tests. First, in both figures the scatter of points
about the parity line is relatively symmetrical which indicates that the order of testing for the
dataset as a whole did not influence the measured value. This result is consistent with the same
finding from the analysis of the comparison of LSHED and PSHED values discussed above.
The second important feature of Figures D-4 and D-5 is that scatter of points about the
parity line for the two plots is quite similar - at least from a visual comparison of the two plots.
D-8
-------
The third feature of Figures D-4 and D-5 that is notable is the relatively homogeneous scatter of
the data points about the parity line across the two orders of magnitude range of the SHED data.
This homogeneous scatter supports the notion that the hot-soak variability of vehicles tends to be
proportional to the value of the hot-soak measurements. That is, the variability can be expressed
as a percentage of the hot-soak measurement value.
The similar hot-soak variabilities in the PSHED and in the LSHED are consistent with
the notion that the variabilities are dominated by the hot-soak emission variability of the vehicles
themselves. The measurement variability due to the performance of the test in either the PSHED
or the LSHED is a small component of the total variability of the measured values as
demonstrated by the propane recovery and retention tests performed in the PSHED during the
testing at Ken Caryl station.
Figure D-4. Hot-Soak Variability in PSHED
100.001
10.00
1.00
0,10
0.01 -i,
o
G
O
0.01
010 1.00
First PSHED (g/Qhr)
10.00
10000
D-9
-------
Figure D-5. Hot-Soak Variability in LSHED
100.001
10.00
0.10
0.0^
001
0.10 100
First LSHED (g/Qhr)
10.00
100.00
Since the variability of the duplicate PSHED values in the log-log plot Figure D-4 looks
homogeneous, we will consider the PSHED data in log-log space. A regression of the natural
logarithm of the second PSHED against that of the first PSHED 1 indicates ln(PSHED2) = -0.018
+ 0.881*ln(PSHEDl). A regression of the ln(PSHEDl) against ln(PSHED2) indicates
In(PSHEDl) = 0.219 + 0.876*ln(PSHED2). However, the x-values of these two regressions have
variability of about the same size as the y-values, and therefore the assumption of ordinary least
squares regression (all variability is in the y-variable and that the x-variable is measured "without
error") is not satisfied. According "to measurement-error modeling," in such a situation, the
slopes calculated by the regressions are low-biased [17]. Because the slopes for the regressions
are similar to each other (0.88) and are expected to both be biased low, we expect that the slopes
for measurement error models, which take into account the variability in the x-variable as well as
the y-variable, would both produce slopes near 1.
Thus, a simple analysis of the paired PSHED and LSHED data values will provide a
reasonable estimate of the relative bias between the first and second PSHED and an estimate of
the variability in a PSHED measurement. The differences of the natural logarithm of the first
PSHED minus the natural logarithm of the second PSHED or the twelve pairs of data points had
a mean difference of 0.124 and a standard deviation of 0.621. The mean difference of 0.124 was
not significantly different from 0 (p=0.5027), and therefore this dataset is not able to detect a
significant difference between the first and second PSHED values. The standard deviation of
D-10
-------
0.621 indicates that a single PSHED measurement has a 90% confidence interval from 36%
(=exp(-l.645*0.621)) to 278% (=exp(+l.645*0.621)) relative to a single PSHED measurement
at 100%. This estimate of PSHED variability is based on the assumption that the relative
variability is independent of PSHED level, which is suggested by the apparent homogeneous
scatter of data about the 1:1 line in Figure D-4.
D-ll
-------
D-12
-------
Appendix E
Descriptions and Data for Non-Participating Vehicles
-------
-------
Table E-1. Vehicle Description and Selection RSMs for Ineligible Non-Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
6
10
26
31
40
61
67
86
90
94
102
105
118
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
Motorhome
TooBig
Motorhome
Motorhome
Motorhome
Motorhome
TooBig
TooBig
132 Motorhome
137 TooBig
145 | Motorhome
170
171
172
176.353
180
195
198
204
206
208
240
260
269
276
279
298
303
TooBig
Motorhome
Motorhome
ESPemployee
Motorhome
Motorhome
Motorhome
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
ESPemployee
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
Motorhome
Year
2002
2003
.ZUU J
1994
1996
1995
1996
1999
1993
1984
1983
1995
2003
1984
2005
1979
2001
1984
1994
1997
1989
1988
1990
1993
2001
1989
1976
2000
1981
1994
1988
1985
Make
GMC
GMC
Toyota
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
GMC
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
GMC
PAA
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Model
3500 Savana
Sierra
Tacoma
Blazer
1500
G30 Van/Motorhome
Jimmy
Stripped Chassis Motorhome
E350
P30
P30
Super Duty
Van
MT
E350
El Dorado Motorhome
F250
Econoline Mobile Truck
E350 Montana Tioga
Lumina
Chevrolet G30
Ford | Tioga
Ford E350
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Cadillac
Ford
GMC
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
F150
F450
F250 Lariat
Custom Camper
Excursion
Seville
Econoline
Sierra
G20 Conversion Van
G30 van
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
29JUN09:08:42:59
29JUN09:10:23:42
30JUN09: 11:49:26
30JUN09:15:45:47
02JUL09:08:36:31
07JUL09:13:15:27
08JUL09: 16: 17:50
13JUL09:09:40:18
13JUL09:12:31:01
14JUL09: 11:58:55
15JUL09:11:59:34
15JUL09:13:43:55
16JUL09: 16:06:33
20JUL09:10:15:36
20JUL09:12:41:04
20JUL09:15:54:39
24JUL09:08:11:19
23 JUL09: 14:52:49
24JUL09:08:11:58
24JUL09: 10:30:22
24JUL09: 14:29: 19
27JUL09:13:59:41
27JUL09: 14:20:06
28JUL09: 11:06:02
28JUL09: 11:29:07
28JUL09: 14: 12:56
3 1JUL09: 10:04:40
03AUG09:09:22:44
03 AUG09: 12:27:01
03 AUG09: 13:50:43
03AUG09:15:03:06
06AUG09:09:55:04
06AUG09:15:06:01
Speed (mph)
17
13
13
10
13
9
11
10
8
9
8
11
11
10
14
13
12
12
15
16
11
13
15
14
8
13
11
11
18
13
12
12
13
Temperature (F)
71
83
93
99
70
89
104
83
100
88
85
91
98
90
98
94
75
107
75
88
99
94
97
68
68
73
81
80
93
97
96
77
82
•<
O
Tl
33
110
169
318
18
188
282
60
147
111
82
133
237
51
134
256
10
188
13
62
173
258
270
113
134
247
42
35
147
188
225
49
176
H
s>
OJ
39
49
79
573
100
832
680
343
250
389
588
326
603
938
45
1268
55
2836
3010
480
168
390
288
155
152
547
1940
146
104
70
312
828
421
EI23 Bin
1
1
2
5
3
6
6
5
4
5
5
5
6
6
1
7
1
7
7
5
4
5
5
4
4
6
7
3
3
2
5
6
5
O
©
•3
86
-27
-11
2724
0
482
2181
1170
82
1774
7576
1373
229
485
-34
5315
26
1118
6212
1826
89
320
373
253
22
817
2235
42
314
168
164
1037
724
O
s*
©
I
•Q
38
-8
-49
2687
-13
273
-1497
-1130
-57
3851
7697
963
138
109
203
256
3
778
4360
1263
60
190
275
116
-47
92
-284
49
262
153
129
3833
1297
8^
9
0.17
0.02
0.05
-0.09
0.03
0.17
0.04
0.05
0.07
4.27
0.85
1.99
0.15
6.29
-0.03
2 42
0.20
2.04
4.22
0.78
0.36
0.29
6.33
3.86
0.09
3.90
3.16
0.06
3.62
4.50
0.38
4.73
6.01
^
©
229
240
11
480
25
1982
42
14
2104
608
1677
1139
69
650
-133
1210
-68
1816
152
234
908
404
480
368
509
711
1066
9
814
203
12
25
247
O
P~
9
14.92
15.03
15.02
15.02
15.03
14.85
14.96
14.98
14.93
11.92
14.16
13.55
14.94
10.50
15.08
13.12
14.91
13.49
11.84
14.43
14.76
14.82
10.49
12.27
14.97
12.21
12.69
15.01
12.42
11.81
14.78
11.63
10.72
E-1
-------
Table E-1. Vehicle Description and Selection RSMs for Ineligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
319
390
399
408
414
441
445
455
456
461
465
471
477
480
484
487
514
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
Motorhome
TooBig
Motorhome
ESPemployee
Motorhome
ESPemployee
HeavyDuty
TooBig
TooBig
TooBig
Motorhome
Motorhome
Motorhome
TooBig
Year
2004
1988
1987
1983
2001
1977
2001
1992
2001
1971
2000
1996
1991
1984
1994
2000
1995
Make
GMC
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Dodge
GMC
Ford
Ford
Dodge
International
Ford
Ford
UMC
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford
Model
Yukon
Silverado
F250
E350
Ram 1500
Van Dura
Escort
E350
Dakota
Loadstar
F350
F350
Aeromate
E350
F350
Express 3500
F250
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
07AUG09:17:01:25
18AUG09:16:45:57
19AUG09:15:31:59
20AUG09:14:13:54
21AUG09:09:59:01
24AUG09:16:25:59
25 AUG09:09: 19:36
25AUG09:14:03:01
25AUG09:15:16:27
26AUG09:09:44:17
26AUG09: 14:59:56
27AUG09:13:18:13
27AUG09:16:07:18
28AUG09:08:24:43
28AUG09:09: 17:33
28AUG09: 10:34:48
31AUG09:11:46:39
Speed (mph)
14
11
10
12
16
9
13
9
14
11
12
11
14
13
12
16
14
Temperature (F)
98
76
100
92
71
77
69
73
69
67
90
88
102
67
69
72
77
^
§
300
176
194
182
70
262
47
198
232
47
179
138
222
9
34
75
174
H
s>
c*>
46
362
191
712
101
390
49
332
200
515
79
172
80
413
208
114
335
W
s
1
5
4
6
3
5
1
5
4
6
2
4
2
5
5
3
5
o
v"
•d
1
300
123
687
0
192
86
978
23
47
267
225
391
36
150
O
s*
v"
•d
1
^OJ
-1
51
-184
3459
22
-973
-40
9
41
-150
-8
33
232
220
-1761
7
19
o
0
9
0.49
0.91
4.48
4.17
-0.07
0.09
0.05
5.63
0.48
0.15
2.08
4.57
0.30
0.03
0.28
O
v"
•d
26
1645
146
462
70
1168
-16
490
17
519
2378
187
3014
1230
1340
P
h-t
9
14.70
14.33
11.83
12.02
15.10
14.94
15.02
10.97
14.71
14.92
13.47
11.77
14.72
14.99
14.80
1
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are forced to zero.
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are not forced to
zero.
E-2
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
19
22
23
24
29
30
32
33
35
36
37
38
41
43
47
50
51
52
54
55
56
58
59
60
63
65
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
2001
2001
1978
2006
1999
1988
2002
1997
1998
2005
2004
1982
1989
2003
1997
1984
1993
1990
1984
2003
1997
1997
1995
2002
2005
1996
2003
2003
2005
1999
1987
2000
Make
BMW
Subaru
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
Dodge
Toyota
Ford
Buick
Cadillac
Honda
Ferrari
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Buick
Jeep
Honda
Excaliber
Jeep
Buick
Nissan
Mitsubishi
Chevrolet
Nissan
Chevrolet
Mitsubishi
BMW
Honda
Chrysler
Jeep
Oldsmobile
Ford
Model
330i
Legacy
Bronco
4Runner
Blazer
Ram
RAV4
Escort LX
LeSabre
CTS
Pilot
308
Probe
Dakota
F150
Riviera
Grand Cherokee
Accord LX
Liberty
Park Avenue
XE Pickup
Eclipse
Cheyenne Cl 500
Maxima
Trailblazer
Eclipse GST
XS
Odyssey
Crossfire
Cherokee Sport
Delta 88
Ranger
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
29JUN09:09:30:41
29JUN09:11:13:20
29JUN09: 11:34: 17
29JUN09:12:03:45
29JUN09: 12:39:41
29JUN09:12:45:58
29JUN09:12:53:42
29JUN09:15:06:38
30JUN09:09:41:49
30JUN09: 10:38:52
30JUN09:11:38:00
30JUN09: 14:42:48
30JUN09:15:14:52
01JUL09:08:57:31
01JUL09:11:10:58
01JUL09: 11:22:37
01JUL09:12:31:56
01JUL09:13:40:50
01JUL09:15:22:13
02JUL09: 10:20:07
06JUL09:11:51:23
06JUL09:12:31:12
06JUL09:13:34:40
06JUL09:15:01:58
06JUL09:15:30:57
06JUL09: 16: 14:44
06JUL09: 16:29:35
07JUL09:07:59:21
07JUL09:09:45:52
07JUL09: 11:20:52
07JUL09: 11:42:23
08JUL09: 10:50:22
08JUL09: 11:47:31
Speed (mph)
10
12
10
14
10
12
11
8
10
12
13
10
11
12
9
8
10
9
11
13
13
14
12
13
10
11
13
15
10
14
10
7
11
Temperature (F)
77
89
89
89
92
93
93
97
80
88
93
100
100
75
90
92
100
103
93
80
89
92
100
94
93
88
87
68
80
92
94
90
94
•<
O
Tl
66
155
173
194
216
234
336
77
104
153
269
284
29
108
115
143
182
224
67
170
204
260
330
345
370
389
8
49
109
119
92
127
H
s>
OJ
61
53
262
46
39
60
44
558
59
83
80
310
2912
38
111
203
795
945
681
51
82
101
1033
56
74
71
348
59
61
81
90
95
71
EI23 Bin
2
1
4
1
1
2
1
6
2
2
2
5
7
1
3
4
6
6
6
1
2
3
6
1
2
2
5
2
2
2
3
3
2
O
h-t
!
^w
16
22
1000
5
243
1084
26
7
74
1158
2095
20
68
373
1870
3120
2837
51
12
60
2507
107
42
11
1011
-4
-5
-1
106
374
43
O
i-j
!
^w
-5
24
1283
-71
-1
242
-50
835
96
11
62
829
-5169
-48
-44
308
-596
1965
2658
40
25
20
2008
37
-4
-16
1707
-7
8
4
-12
252
-53
8
h-t
9
0.29
0.10
3.38
0.08
0.10
0.37
0.03
0.02
0.04
3.74
0.07
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.17
8.90
0.06
0.11
0.04
0.11
0.13
1.67
0.54
0.17
0.30
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.03
2.56
0.01
§
h-t
!
-6
70
580
-9
491
87
15
17
-13
272
1701
61
71
738
263
48
3721
-26
13
6
402
1329
11
10
1739
39
-18
196
411
212
9
9
14.85
14.98
12.58
15.00
14.96
14.75
15.03
15.04
15.02
12.33
14.88
15.03
15.04
14.97
14.87
8.58
14.79
14.98
15.02
14.97
14.87
13.81
14.66
14.93
14.75
15.03
15.05
15.03
15.01
13.20
15.04
E-3
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
66
70
71
72
73
74
76
78
80
81
83
84
87
88
89
97
98
99
101
104
106
107
111
113
114
115
116
117
119
123
124
125
126
128
129
133
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1994
1994
1993
1980
2003
1994
1997
1997
2001
Eligible 2007
Eligible 1991
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
2005
1997
1969
2006
2008
1999
2001
2006
Make
Saturn
Ford
Toyota
Pontiac
Ford
Dodge
Mazda
Toyota
Isuzu
Toyota
Toyota
Honda
Honda
Toyota
Chevrolet
BMW
Jeep
Honda
Pontiac
Toyota
1988 1 Honda
2003 Volvo
1995 Jeep
1985
1991
1990
1996
1997
1993
1 QQQ
2005
Ford
Subaru
Toyota
Saturn
Chevrolet
VW
1 Isuzu
Nissan
2005 Mitsubishi
1979
2003
1992
2001
Jeep
Chrysler
Mazda
Toyota
Model
STL
Explorer
Corolla
Torrent
Ranger F250
Durango
MX-6
4Runner
Rodeo
Corolla
Sequoia
Accord
Pilot
Tacoma
Camaro SS
325xi
Liberty
Passport
Montana
Highlander
Prelude
S60
Wagoneer
F250
XT6
Camry
SL
Cavalier
FoxGL
Amigo
350Z
Eclipse GST
Town and Country
Navajo
Highlander
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
08JUL09:13:24:00
09JUL09:09:43:54
09JUL09: 10:24: 17
09JUL09: 12:27: 19
09JUL09:13:31:18
09JUL09:10:17:01
10JUL09:09:50:36
10JUL09:09:52:21
10JUL09: 11:30:46
10JUL09: 11:42:22
10JUL09:13:53:29
10JUL09:13:55:02
13JUL09: 10:59: 14
13JUL09: 11:30:43
13JUL09: 12:06:08
14JUL09: 12:33:33
14JUL09: 12:45:22
14JUL09: 12:57:21
15JUL09:11:41:09
16JUL09:09:40:08
16JUL09: 10:54:29
16JUL09:! 1:13:29
16JUL09:13:15:59
16JUL09:13:44:22
16JUL09:14:35:18
16JUL09: 14:50:50
16JUL09:15:03:32
16JUL09:15:21:31
17JUL09:08:21:37
17JUL09: 14:03:43
17JUL09: 14:24: 17
17JUL09: 14:50:30
17JUL09:15:04:11
20JUL09:08:32:47
20JUL09:09:33:59
20JUL09: 10:29:36
Speed (mph)
10
10
8
7
10
12
12
12
10
12
14
13
11
14
8
17
9
9
11
14
9
8
13
10
13
11
6
14
12
12
11
10
13
18
10
8
Temperature (F)
103
74
78
88
94
78
85
85
91
94
100
100
91
93
97
94
95
94
83
80
88
89
96
96
96
98
98
98
69
97
97
101
100
76
87
94
•<
O
Tl
183
70
88
156
185
84
60
62
120
127
191
193
92
113
129
137
143
147
80
21
61
77
139
160
189
201
206
212
19
214
230
243
248
13
32
62
H
s>
OJ
93
78
62
98
913
80
83
60
178
428
56
399
83
40
335
45
138
181
105
32
500
76
1049
721
64
85
60
909
273
864
85
107
582
40
161
56
EI23 Bin
3
2
2
3
6
2
2
2
3
5
1
5
2
1
5
1
3
4
3
1
5
2
6
6
2
2
1
6
5
6
2
3
6
1
4
1
O
©
•3
4
24
32
4
1574
15
55
56
1660
2879
5
380
8
17
1310
21
8
36
17
-10
595
61
524
12
54
5952
559
977
17
0
1649
-12
9
39
O
s*
©
•3
-189
-4
27
9
1191
0
53
-7
1404
1079
-33
51
12
27
1582
13
19
27
-15
-6
314
-27
2079
49
-5
35
367
3470
-691
-239
9
1
237
-36
-17
-88
8^
9
0.45
-0.01
0.18
0.02
10.36
0.09
0.43
0.16
1.31
0.04
0.19
0.11
0.03
0.18
3.46
0.02
0.04
0.37
0.06
0.01
0.92
0.01
3.78
0.14
0.27
0.65
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.12
7.54
0.14
0.87
0.09
^
©
1
139
43
90
-7
450
13
566
82
373
245
-4
63
8
169
286
-2
-27
182
227
-4
1867
112
11
1695
1858
164
118
25
6
3
263
659
11
109
9
14.73
15.06
14.92
15.04
7.56
14.99
14.73
14.93
14.05
14.93
14.92
14.96
15.03
14.92
12.52
15.04
15.03
14.78
15.00
15.04
14.31
15.04
12.33
14.89
14.79
14.41
14.94
15.00
15.02
14.97
9.59
14.93
14.43
14.98
E-4
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
136
140
141
142
143
144
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
160
164.169
165
166
167
173
174
175
179
181
182
183
187
191.411
196
199
200
201
202
207
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Year
1996
1994
1997
1998
1983
1993
2005
1989
1997
2003
2001
2003
2003
2003
2005
2003
2009
1993
1991
2001
Make
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Ford
Mercedes
VW
Toyota
Chevrolet
Honda
Ford
Dodge
Audi
Toyota
Subaru
Audi
Acura
Toyota
Buick
Toyota
Jeep
1984 Jeep
Model
4Runner
Explorer
Ranger
Windstar
380SL
EuroVan
Camry
1500
Civic
Expedition
Grand Caravan
A4
Camry
Outback
A6
MDX
Corolla
Riviera
MR2
Grand Cherokee
CJ7
2002 Jeep Liberty
1984 Ford | Ranger
2005
1998
2007
1981
1992
2001
1991
1996
1985
1999
2000
1999
1993
Buick
Chevrolet
Toyota
Jeep
Mitsubishi
Subaru
Dodge
Chevrolet
Nissan
Pontiac
Toyota
Audi
Ford
LeSabre
S-10
4Runner
CJ7
Eclipse GSX
Forester
Stealth
Astro Van
300ZX
Grand Am
Camry
A4
Ranger
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
20JUL09: 12:22:49
20JUL09: 14:27: 11
20JUL09: 14:39:47
20JUL09: 14:44: 16
20JUL09: 15:08:39
20JUL09: 15:34:48
20JUL09: 16:04:52
21 JUL09:09: 14:28
21 JUL09: 10:07:55
21JUL09: 11:24: 10
21JUL09:13:58:21
21 JUL09: 12:22:52
21 JUL09: 14:00:52
21JUL09:16:12:44
22JUL09:08:27:50
22JUL09:09:49:48
22JUL09:15:00:38
23JUL09: 15: 18:00
23 JUL09: 16:43:56
23 JUL09: 12:57:27
23JUL09:13:18:26
24JUL09:09: 17:20
24JUL09:09:32:25
24JUL09:08:58:11
24JUL09: 11:57:55
24JUL09: 14:42:24
24JUL09: 14:24:34
24JUL09: 14:39:37
27JUL09:09:40:49
27JUL09: 10:59:20
27JUL09: 14:34:39
28JUL09:08: 16:54
28JUL09:09:56:34
28JUL09: 10:03:33
28JUL09: 10:42:21
28JUL09:12:16:17
Speed (mph)
7
13
13
9
13
13
14
12
14
8
15
18
15
12
11
12
12
14
12
11
13
18
11
14
13
15
13
12
13
14
12
9
13
17
18
15
Temperature (F)
97
99
101
101
103
101
93
73
76
79
86
84
86
80
71
80
102
107
101
101
102
82
83
79
97
98
99
98
78
85
95
65
68
67
68
68
•<
O
Tl
121
198
204
207
228
246
264
44
66
103
165
127
167
227
7
32
181
192
236
132
138
38
42
30
99
177
172
174
66
122
280
12
57
61
89
162
H
s>
OJ
157
78
630
352
251
50
65
294
52
87
62
69
44
43
65
76
77
88
162
185
288
99
161
105
989
48
882
2370
46
638
138
167
82
124
63
885
EI23 Bin
4
2
6
5
4
1
2
5
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
4
3
6
1
6
7
1
6
3
4
2
3
2
6
O
©
•3
389
182
1740
1849
525
-25
-4
157
41
58
-5
6
-11
-2
5
3
-43
65
217
193
163
712
66
2512
-41
1130
6102
87
963
91
723
2
233
16
1310
O
s*
©
•3
328
136
872
1567
83
-37
5
119
30
-11
-16
9
-25
1
8
-19
-26
81
191
112
5819
169
289
-42
1606
-114
517
2448
66
864
31
758
0
173
18
1512
8^
9
0.01
8.75
0.05
0.12
5.70
0.50
0.02
2.26
0.17
0.24
0.06
1.62
0.01
0.18
0.07
0.03
0.05
0.39
0.05
0.26
5.18
10.74
1.72
0.10
0.07
7.19
0.17
0.21
3.62
0.03
0.87
0.03
2.69
0.15
1.69
^
©
1
2711
-5
904
121
81
762
-2
679
293
35
34
3
-2
11
-15
1
59
147
580
151
247
204
19
34
-41
75
38
133
1404
322
2390
-1
869
45
425
9
14.94
8.78
14.93
14.91
10.95
14.67
15.04
13.40
14.92
14.88
15.01
13.89
15.04
14.92
15.00
15.03
15.02
14.77
14.99
14.86
11.33
7.33
13.82
14.90
15.00
9.86
14.75
14.89
12.38
15.02
14.33
15.03
13.09
14.94
13.79
E-5
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
209
210
211
215
216
222
223.256
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
233
234
235
236
237
239
241
245
247
248
250
251
253
254
257
258
259
264
265
267
268
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
2001
1995
1989
2001
1998
2001
1995
1995
1990
1994
2004
2003
1997
2005
1993
2000
2007
Eligible 2007
Eligible 2003
Eligible 1992
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Dealer
1996
1990
2002
2001
2004
1983
1988
1996
2005
1 994
1996
1993
1982
2004
1991
2007
Make
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Chevrolet
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Jeep
Chevrolet
Ford
Honda
Toyota
GMC
Nissan
Buick
Chevrolet
Nissan
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mazda
Nissan
Dodge
Daewoo
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Mercedes
Toyota
Scion
Geo
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Honda
Toyota
Honda
Model
Cherokee Sport
Wrangler
F150
Pickup
Legacy
Blazer
Blazer
Grand Cherokee
Van 20
Ranger
Pilot
RAV4
Jimmy
Altima
LeSabre
Suburban
Altima
Tundra
Corvette
Miata
Pathfinder
Ram
Leganza
Tacoma
Impala
CJ7
300E
Tacoma
XA
Metro
Cherokee
Mustang
F150
Pilot
Camry
Pilot
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
28JUL09: 14: 13:51
28JUL09:15:01:50
28JUL09: 15:39:29
28JUL09: 16: 16:23
28JUL09: 16:34:06
29JUL09: 12:07:52
29JUL09:13:25:41
29JUL09:13:33:47
29JUL09: 16:29:42
29JUL09: 14:02:23
29JUL09:15:21:33
29 JUL09: 15:37:00
30JUL09: 10:59:22
30JUL09: 11:20:32
30JUL09: 11:48:26
30JUL09: 12:05: 16
30JUL09: 12:55:04
30JUL09:13:36:36
30JUL09:14:41:33
30JUL09:15:15:51
30JUL09:15:59:13
31JUL09:08:26:00
31JUL09:08:43:46
3 1JUL09: 10:29:50
3 1JUL09: 10:43:46
3 1JUL09: 11:58:25
31JUL09:12:03:19
3 1JUL09: 12:22:59
31JUL09:13:52:25
3 1JUL09: 16:20:58
3 1JUL09: 16:27:25
3 1JUL09: 16:36:46
03AUG09:11:10:19
03 AUG09: 11:23:44
03 AUG09: 12:06:25
03AUG09:12:10:41
Speed (mph)
15
12
12
13
10
17
13
17
15
12
15
14
15
17
8
7
13
13
10
11
13
14
13
16
8
15
14
14
14
14
17
11
10
11
13
19
Temperature (F)
73
73
74
74
73
71
71
72
69
72
79
78
60
60
59
59
60
61
61
64
74
66
68
82
83
84
84
81
88
78
79
81
93
93
95
95
•<
O
Tl
248
283
300
322
331
132
169
171
285
197
250
255
50
61
81
87
120
155
172
190
207
15
17
64
72
131
133
143
198
270
274
280
93
106
136
138
H
s>
OJ
70
181
1931
96
67
95
2325
102
548
1021
185
45
106
114
58
162
118
91
62
117
156
530
64
59
151
158
378
77
40
259
133
138
503
66
446
87
EI23 Bin
2
4
7
3
2
3
7
3
6
6
4
1
3
3
1
4
3
3
2
3
4
5
2
2
4
4
5
2
1
4
3
3
5
2
5
2
O
©
•3
174
185
791
168
58
185
8565
393
420
5072
17
-11
55
6
163
20
7
5
4
87
40
669
14
-2
265
417
-44
-69
123
116
760
-17
1511
5
O
s*
©
•3
171
68
213
152
48
164
6415
223
510
6898
8
-12
-60
8
55
21
12
-31
3
85
-54
689
42
-186
-39
224
42
6
-13
87
52
-17
144
37
1431
5
8^
9
3.57
0.47
0.52
4.23
0.53
3.23
8.11
2.95
3.96
0.08
0.04
0.20
0.32
0.01
0.12
0.05
0.16
0.01
0.02
0.25
0.13
10.14
0.13
0.07
3.90
0.68
0.09
-0.01
0.37
0.06
4.50
0.02
4.08
0.02
^
©
1
39
308
705
155
311
30
947
1028
649
-69
2
79
524
33
5921
42
21
32
19
348
1361
101
3
78
504
357
120
1612
1833
373
569
32
176
-11
9
12.49
14.70
14.63
12.01
14.66
12.73
8.95
12.89
12.18
14.85
15.02
14.91
14.80
15.05
14.75
15.01
14.94
15.05
15.04
14.86
14.91
7.76
14.96
15.00
12.23
14.54
14.98
15.01
14.72
14.99
11.78
15.04
12.08
15.04
E-6
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
270
272
273
274
275
277
280
281
282
283
284
286
287
288
289
291
292
293
296
297
299
300
304
307
308
310
312
313
314
315
317
318
322
323
324
326
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
FleetVehicle
Eligible
Dealer
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
FleetVehicle
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1999
1991
1988
2001
1984
2004
1994
2005
1974
2002
1982
2006
1966
1998
1991
1995
2005
1994
1995
1963
2005
2005
2006
1995
1996
2001
2003
1994
2005
1990
2005
1995
1998
2007
2004
1991
Make
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Nissan
Ford
Honda
Ford
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Jeep
Volvo
Chevrolet
Buick
Buick
Chevrolet
Ford
Subaru
Chevrolet
GMC
Buick
Ford
Ford
Mazda
BMW
Ford
Toyota
Honda
Honda
Dodge
Nissan
BMW
Ford
Honda
Saturn
Model
Explorer
Long Bed
Mustang
Frontier
Tempo
Accord
F150
Liberty
F250
Ram
F250
Laredo
122
1500
Century
Century
Silverado
F150
Outback
CIO
Sierra
Century
F150
Taurus
626
Z3
Focus
Land Cruiser
Civic
Accord
SRT-4
Maxima
Z3
Taurus
Accord
SL2
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
03AUG09:12:55:31
03 AUG09: 13:26:42
03AUG09: 13:41: 14
03 AUG09: 13:41:40
03AUG09:13:47:10
03AUG09:14:26:17
04AUG09:11:14:58
04AUG09:10:41:31
04AUG09:11:21:24
04AUG09:11:36:16
04AUG09: 14: 17:22
04AUG09:15:24:51
04AUG09:15:53:15
04AUG09: 16: 17:36
05AUG09: 10:29:06
05AUG09:12:33:04
05AUG09: 13:04:23
05AUG09: 13: 14:34
05AUG09:15:17:35
06AUG09:09:07:27
06AUG09:09:57:38
06AUG09: 10:04:27
07AUG09:08:14:31
07AUG09: 10: 14:50
07AUG09: 10:54:37
07AUG09: 13:32:47
07AUG09: 14:40:37
07AUG09: 14:44:01
07AUG09:15:03:47
07AUG09:15:55:24
07AUG09: 16:30:59
07AUG09: 16:36:00
10AUG09:11:30:17
10AUG09: 12:21:25
10AUG09: 12:44: 13
10AUG09:15:38:21
Speed (mph)
9
11
6
10
13
12
11
10
10
12
11
13
14
12
13
14
14
12
13
13
10
9
15
17
15
14
14
8
11
9
16
12
14
13
15
12
Temperature (F)
97
93
93
93
97
98
84
81
86
87
102
96
97
94
80
90
91
95
103
75
78
78
71
82
85
99
110
110
110
105
100
105
80
85
88
100
•<
O
Tl
162
175
179
180
183
207
104
80
107
116
131
171
181
198
59
125
136
146
190
32
50
52
15
88
101
190
228
229
236
265
283
286
89
119
130
225
H
s>
OJ
112
61
883
344
1453
151
222
100
360
165
521
72
388
61
294
2219
167
457
95
551
314
43
105
308
81
152
86
170
96
104
278
493
195
61
86
334
EI23 Bin
3
2
6
6
7
4
4
3
5
4
6
2
5
2
5
7
4
5
3
6
5
1
3
5
2
4
2
4
3
3
5
5
4
2
2
5
O
©
•3
4
166
2570
5315
31
394
16
329
29
1039
6
941
-2
532
2659
21
902
203
1446
545
-9
37
1427
9
7
4
28
39
12
274
914
28
-40
45
440
O
s*
©
•3
-23
95
898
-2651
6178
16
169
-29
91
6
421
-10
702
9
788
-797
21
356
44
-942
178
-7
14
914
1
25
12
30
4
39
257
728
0
-60
20
54
8^
9
0.15
0.58
0.36
2.41
1.60
3.08
0.07
0.73
0.01
4.34
0.05
1.92
0.03
-0.01
0.08
0.10
0.05
1.67
6.41
0.07
0.01
0.08
4.26
0.07
0.12
1.09
0.05
2.02
0.12
0.03
1.42
0.09
0.05
3.12
0.29
^
©
1
11
1704
265
317
-29
160
-13
1471
59
213
-1
1466
474
986
571
79
179
206
465
71
-13
-1
707
271
31
-9
100
22
641
104
173
80
59
22
990
9
14.95
14.58
14.71
13.16
13.91
12.83
15.00
14.47
15.04
11.90
15.02
13.59
15.01
15.01
14.89
14.98
14.99
13.84
10.40
14.98
15.05
14.99
11.93
14.99
14.97
14.27
15.01
13.60
14.95
15.02
14.00
14.99
15.02
12.82
14.80
E-7
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
328
330
333
334
335
336
338
340
341
342
344
345
346
347
349
351
356
358
359
360
363
366
368
369
372
373
374
376
377
378
380
382
384
386
388
389
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
2005
2001
2003
1999
2003
1980
1999
1994
1998
1999
1988
1996
2003
1992
1985
1999
2005
1997
2000
2001
2003
2003
1994
1993
1996
1997
2003
1993
1992
2004
1987
2001
1985
1998
1992
2001
Make
Volvo
Mercedes
Dodge
Toyota
BMW
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Toyota
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Honda
Chevrolet
Toyota
Ford
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Chevrolet
Dodge
BMW
Toyota
Ford
Toyota
Subaru
Jaguar
Pontiac
Acura
Toyota
Chevrolet
Toyota
Jeep
Ford
Honda
Chevrolet
Model
S40
ML320
Caravan
Sienna
540i
Malibu
Van
Ranger
4Runner
Ram 2500
Corvette
F150
Accord
Half-Ton
Pickup
Explorer
Dakota
Malibu
Ranger
Suburban
Stratus
530i
Camry
Ranger
Corolla
Outback/Legacy
XKR
Trans Am
Integra
Corolla
3/4 Ton Pickup
Sienna
Wagoneer
Escort
Accord
Astro
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
10AUG09: 16:30:56
11AUG09: 10:21: 17
11AUG09:11:45:52
11AUG09: 12:04:50
11AUG09: 12:20:56
11AUG09: 12:24:00
11AUG09:15:52:54
11AUG09:16:10:12
11AUG09:17:03:35
12AUG09:10:13:02
12AUG09: 10:22: 17
12AUG09: 10:48:36
12AUG09: 10:48:46
12AUG09:11:19:25
12AUG09:13:01:05
12AUG09:15:10:16
13AUG09:10:23:14
13AUG09:12:03:56
13AUG09:15:10:04
13AUG09: 16:09: 14
14AUG09:09:58:10
14AUG09:12:43:41
14AUG09:15:35:07
14AUG09: 16:36:47
17AUG09:09:31:03
17AUG09:09:49:29
17AUG09:09:56:58
17AUG09: 12:32:45
17AUG09:13:10:10
17AUG09: 13:20:57
17AUG09:15:07:27
17AUG09:15:22:46
18AUG09:08:18:12
18AUG09:10:00:29
18AUG09:12:34:50
18AUG09:14:54:27
Speed (mph)
11
12
10
13
13
12
13
15
10
11
11
12
15
9
7
14
11
17
12
13
12
13
16
10
12
15
18
16
7
13
13
12
12
12
16
13
Temperature (F)
104
79
91
92
92
93
112
115
117
82
83
87
87
91
101
110
85
93
78
97
74
81
94
83
65
66
66
77
81
83
86
86
63
69
82
65
•<
O
Tl
239
50
90
98
101
103
214
229
246
41
50
72
73
90
138
203
58
119
188
211
64
153
249
278
41
49
57
146
153
157
224
233
12
57
125
141
H
s>
OJ
63
63
89
210
113
972
79
2073
260
187
211
164
30
181
196
63
270
96
66
161
146
37
122
77
200
113
46
291
157
71
155
56
214
92
54
60
EI23 Bin
2
2
2
4
3
6
2
7
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
2
5
3
2
4
3
1
3
2
4
3
1
4
4
2
4
1
4
3
1
2
O
©
•3
-1
-20
-6
228
24
2177
20
3888
238
169
131
48
-23
549
446
-12
16
4
8
16
18
118
185
22
348
284
-7
826
97
83
63
18
610
-6
36
5
O
s*
©
•3
-3
-14
-47
194
19
369
24
-1680
70
116
53
-54
1
279
-1094
15
1
7
8
1
3
65
187
0
87
177
-13
1321
112
-40
11
19
159
4
40
-47
8^
9
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.67
0.01
2.22
0.21
0.22
0.02
0.49
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.25
0.13
0.05
0.09
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.39
0.06
1.52
0.17
2.13
0.04
0.64
0.74
0.06
0.14
0.11
7.32
0.02
1.04
0.02
^
©
1
47
9
-7
188
3
1405
384
3986
15
2480
2820
50
25
990
3071
18
124
-12
1849
322
6
140
818
3
1103
684
13
1197
213
231
2279
120
179
140
108
47
9
15.02
15.03
15.03
14.56
15.04
13.34
14.89
14.64
15.03
14.61
14.94
15.05
15.04
14.82
14.84
15.02
14.98
15.03
14.93
15.01
15.03
14.77
14.98
13.96
14.88
13.49
15.03
14.53
14.51
15.00
14.87
14.97
9.78
15.04
14.30
15.04
Eo
-O
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
394
398
400
403
406
407
409
410
412
413
415
417
418
419
421
422
423
426
429
433
434
435
436
440
442
443
444
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
457
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
FleetVehicle
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1991
1990
2006
2003
2005
1995
1994
2005
2005
1995
2005
2002
2002
1987
2001
1994
2004
1993
2003
1997
1994
2001
1990
2001
1985
1982
2003
2004
2003
2001
1999
1993
1994
1994
1973
2000
Make
Ford
Plymouth
Toyota
Ford
Chrysler
Geo
Toyota
Subaru
Dodge
Ford
Ford
GMC
Kia
GMC
Honda
GMC
Dodge
Toyota
Acura
Isuzu
Chevrolet
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
GMC
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Jeep
Mazda
Volvo
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Model
Taurus
Acclaim
Tacoma
Crown Victoria
Crossfire
Prizm
Celica
Legacy
Grand Caravan
F150
Escape
Denali
Sedona
Jimmy
Civic
Sierra
Ram 1500
Corolla
RSX-S
Rodeo
Cavalier
Sequoia
Camry
Corolla
S-10
Suburban
Envoy
Alero
Cavalier
Wagoneer/Cherokee
Protege
240
F250
Camry
XLT Ranger
Legacy
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
19AUG09:13:13:58
19AUG09: 14:22:20
20AUG09:08:32:02
20AUG09:12:14:20
20 AUG09: 13:32:47
20 AUG09: 13:48:28
20 AUG09: 14:50:35
20AUG09:15:22:05
20AUG09:16:25:11
20 AUG09: 16:54:41
21AUG09:10:11:41
21AUG09:10:34:51
21AUG09:11:53:26
21AUG09:12:14:29
21AUG09:12:57:17
21AUG09:13:45:31
21 AUG09: 13:48:02
24AUG09:09: 15:41
24AUG09: 10:28:30
24AUG09: 11:37:04
24AUG09:11:48:11
24AUG09:13:24:31
24AUG09: 13:56:42
24AUG09:15:08:08
24AUG09: 16:26:06
24AUG09: 16:56:49
25AUG09:08:00:24
25AUG09:09:50:38
25AUG09:10:15:11
25 AUG09: 10:22:07
25 AUG09: 10:30:22
25AUG09:10:42:14
25AUG09:10:53:08
25AUG09:11:34:51
25AUG09:11:49:11
25AUG09:16:01:00
Speed (mph)
9
14
15
15
11
12
13
16
12
13
14
11
12
10
14
15
15
12
15
11
12
15
11
13
13
11
13
16
11
13
10
10
14
16
13
15
Temperature (F)
87
93
61
80
87
89
96
99
104
103
71
73
78
80
85
92
93
79
80
86
86
88
87
83
77
76
66
72
72
72
72
73
74
77
77
79
•<
O
Tl
127
163
7
121
151
165
196
203
228
239
76
94
145
158
183
217
220
12
62
107
113
167
184
220
263
274
6
61
84
86
93
100
108
132
139
265
H
s>
OJ
2530
263
109
139
81
341
104
153
170
207
92
152
68
123
106
229
163
85
45
280
52
153
88
62
1168
459
70
120
62
72
150
223
1643
74
3434
103
EI23 Bin
7
5
3
3
2
5
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
3
3
4
4
2
1
4
1
4
2
2
7
4
2
3
2
2
3
4
7
2
7
3
O
©
•3
3186
770
153
11
485
218
15
13
268
-3
14
-12
278
75
292
18
293
-23
1345
341
8
486
209
680
14173
30
6
8
73
4
662
7831
20
3834
119
O
s*
©
•3
3850
-225
-313
69
27
210
226
19
50
67
-19
-26
-23
299
-8
324
-22
257
-25
1283
265
-8
401
148
563
13771
-1
12
-19
25
-8
538
9751
16
-250
174
8^
9
0.06
1.16
0.09
0.07
0.32
1.09
0.03
0.54
2.94
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.33
1.35
6.41
0.01
1.16
0.00
1.27
1.73
0.04
9.96
1.44
1.92
5.30
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.32
0.10
9.43
4.12
0.03
4.18
5.65
^
©
1
1399
103
38
8
173
741
199
-18
252
61
93
22
718
-23
326
66
556
55
447
506
995
34
139
235
1945
104
6
601
64
1245
168
1038
139
700
42
9
14.87
14.19
14.98
15.00
14.81
14.24
15.03
14.67
12.93
15.04
15.05
15.04
14.78
14.09
10.44
15.04
14.19
15.05
14.09
13.79
14.99
7.89
14.01
13.65
10.76
15.02
15.04
14.99
14.82
14.94
8.27
11.83
15.02
11.92
11.00
E-9
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
458
459
462
463
464
467
470
472
473
474
476
478
479
483
485.534
488
490
491
492
493
495
496
499
500
501
502
503
505
506
508
509
510
511
513
515
516
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
CommercialVehicle
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1988
1996
2000
2000
1998
2001
2006
1999
1995
1970
1986
2004
1990
1998
1985
2000
2002
2003
1979
2000
2001
2005
1999
1994
2001
1990
1991
1988
1 998
1997
Make
Jeep
Jeep
Saab
Chevrolet
Ford
Chevrolet
Nissan
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Jeep
Pontiac
Jeep
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Lexus
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford
Jeep
GMC
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
GMC
Chevrolet
Toyota
Toyota
[Chevrolet
Ford
1985 Ford
1992
2002
2005
1974
Lexus
Chevrolet
Mercedes
VW
Model
Wrangler
Grand Cherokee
95
Astro
Taurus
Corvette
Armada SE
Cherokee
C-1500
Custom 10 350
Wagoneer
Grand Am
Cherokee
Corvette
F250
Ram 1500
GS430
Explorer
Avalanche
Ranger
Cherokee
Sonoma
Camry
Accord
4Runner
Jimmy
Corvette
MR2
4Runner
S-10
Explorer
Ranger
SL400
Avalanche
ML350
Vanagon
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
25AUG09:16:14:14
26AUG09:09:02:19
26AUG09:12:43:11
26AUG09:13:35:29
26AUG09: 13:49:35
27 AUG09: 12:08:41
27AUG09:13:17:30
27 AUG09: 13:47:06
27 AUG09: 14:26:50
27AUG09:15:00:29
27AUG09:15:27:51
27 AUG09: 16:29:47
27 AUG09: 16:47:34
28AUG09:08:59:56
28AUG09:09:48:16
28AUG09: 10:40:05
28AUG09:12:03:56
28AUG09:12:10:10
28AUG09: 12: 17:55
28AUG09: 12:32:29
28AUG09: 14:04:30
28AUG09:14:15:45
28AUG09:15:18:09
28AUG09:15:21:32
28AUG09:15:52:12
28AUG09:15:53:43
28AUG09:16:55:00
31AUG09:09:25:02
31AUG09:09:51:55
3 1AUG09: 10:38:04
31AUG09:10:59:10
31AUG09:11:02:38
31AUG09:11:18:04
31AUG09:11:40:58
31AUG09:11:50:18
31AUG09:11:37:46
Speed (mph)
14
15
13
12
11
8
16
11
15
12
15
15
13
16
17
15
12
16
12
13
13
16
15
10
12
10
12
14
11
15
16
14
9
7
7
11
Temperature (F)
80
67
80
82
82
84
88
91
95
95
100
103
103
68
70
72
76
77
77
79
91
92
102
102
101
101
108
65
70
70
73
73
74
77
78
77
•<
O
Tl
270
36
134
155
158
113
137
151
174
190
201
232
241
19
46
79
129
134
140
144
205
218
254
259
266
267
298
71
92
124
134
138
147
172
176
167
H
s>
OJ
163
179
188
70
432
66
71
97
61
99
306
99
165
88
304
170
81
535
78
189
153
199
54
224
68
130
611
62
260
56
378
118
132
240
58
551
EI23 Bin
4
4
4
2
5
2
2
3
2
2
5
3
4
2
5
4
2
6
2
4
4
4
1
4
2
3
6
2
4
1
5
3
3
4
2
6
O
©
•3
414
110
222
11
2078
10
29
15
116
869
473
-5
320
25
506
27
-2
472
39
84
93
60
0
427
195
31
666
27
61
-28
1293
10
42
100
4437
O
s*
©
•3
314
94
116
24
970
-4
-5
-6
113
756
361
-4
274
22
443
-50
9
-39
-30
9
-32
60
-15
333
214
43
506
28
13
-58
1019
295
9
-4
-56
110
8^
9
6.39
0.41
1.04
0.04
0.08
0.13
0.02
0.37
0.83
7.95
3.42
0.03
5.40
0.04
6.66
0.07
0.03
2.76
0.06
3.26
0.16
3.41
0.06
0.81
3.10
0.07
1.50
0.11
0.83
0.05
2.70
0.08
0.05
0.03
5.51
^
©
1
179
272
238
-8
110
-2
99
243
55
291
475
9
511
62
698
30
161
42
403
349
-1
13
-5
541
2
455
212
246
363
340
170
599
91
11
692
9
10.45
14.75
14.29
15.03
14.93
14.96
15.04
14.78
14.45
9.32
12.57
15.03
11.15
15.03
10.24
15.00
15.02
13.06
14.99
12.70
14.94
12.60
15.01
14.44
12.83
14.98
13.95
14.96
14.44
15.01
13.08
14.98
15.01
15.03
10.95
E-10
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
519
520
522
523
524
525
526
528
529
530
531
532
533
535
536
537
538
539
541
543
544
545
548
549
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
560
561
562
564
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
NotOwner
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1997
1980
2004
1997
2005
1999
1994
2003
1996
2002
1967
1991
2001
2005
1996
1993
1963
2002
1995
1993
2002
1991
1995
1997
1996
2002
2005
1994
Make
Pontiac
Jeep
Audi
Jeep
Isuzu
Pontiac
Land Rover
Jeep
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Ford
Chevrolet
Nissan
Ford
Hyundai
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
GMC
Toyota
Jeep
Lexus
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Infmiti
Toyota
Chrysler
Ford
2003 Dodge
1995 1 Ford
1999 Dodge
2005
1999
1992
Eligible | 1999
Chevrolet
Mercedes
Range Rover
Chevrolet
Model
Grand Am
Wagoneer
A4
Wrangler
Rodeo
Vibe
Range Rover
Cherokee
Silhouette
Blazer
Expedition
Camaro
Maxima
Taurus
Sonata
F150
Tacoma
C-10
Yukon
Camry
Cherokee
RX300
MR2
Blazer
Grand Cherokee
G20
4Runner
Pacifica
Bronco
Ram 2500
F150
Neon
Trailblazer
E320
LR
Suburban Kl 500
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
31AUG09:13:35:12
3 1AUG09: 13:41:53
31AUG09:14:15:44
31AUG09:14:22:18
31AUG09:14:43:16
31AUG09:15:06:14
31AUG09:15:14:31
3 1AUG09: 16:00:56
31AUG09:16:19:04
3 1AUG09: 16:54:05
01SEP09:08:27:11
01SEP09:08:36:30
01SEP09:08:59:12
01SEP09:10:26:39
01SEP09:10:40:15
01SEP09: 11:39:39
01SEP09:11:48:01
01SEP09:12:13:23
01SEP09:14:26:35
01SEP09:15:58:26
01SEP09:16:15:03
02SEP09:08:34:39
02SEP09: 10:37:20
02SEP09:13:13:01
02SEP09:15:33:13
03SEP09:08:53:13
03SEP09:09:13:03
03SEP09:09:20:52
03SEP09: 11:02:54
03SEP09:! 1:19:41
03SEP09:11:25:09
03SEP09:11:45:51
03SEP09: 12:21:38
03SEP09:13:00:43
03SEP09:13:15:51
03SEP09:15:15:34
Speed (mph)
12
12
11
12
16
13
13
8
11
14
15
13
11
14
14
9
6
15
11
11
12
11
16
10
14
13
13
9
13
16
15
12
10
11
13
9
Temperature (F)
83
83
84
85
85
83
82
86
86
80
65
66
68
78
80
85
86
90
93
94
92
69
75
91
100
69
71
72
80
80
81
83
86
89
91
104
•<
O
Tl
255
260
285
290
305
317
323
351
359
375
13
18
28
71
78
106
110
127
176
228
235
11
74
142
206
24
36
39
70
79
81
88
105
112
118
167
H
s>
OJ
85
203
82
252
158
103
171
498
167
48
71
2459
384
401
75
61
93
192
347
307
201
112
322
1989
78
55
596
60
144
96
276
122
127
51
102
172
EI23 Bin
2
4
2
4
4
3
4
5
4
1
2
7
5
5
2
2
3
4
5
5
4
3
5
7
2
1
6
2
3
3
4
3
3
1
3
4
O
©
•3
56
258
4
300
206
16
11
1995
34
74
5
4289
609
335
-32
16
117
646
407
713
18
276
1085
16
2
1178
5
56
15
1629
66
13
7
49
59
O
s*
©
•3
40
259
12
148
150
3
-3
1014
-33
18
-8
3569
312
4
-13
112
119
517
116
632
151
12
249
667
28
233
269
-14
44
-53
479
-81
-47
16
-14
-6
8^
9
0.02
0.16
0.02
0.83
2.86
0.03
0.01
0.28
0.05
0.06
0.20
4.27
0.10
4.66
0.01
0.04
0.20
8.28
3.48
0.38
0.06
4.71
0.03
0.19
0.58
2.45
0.04
0.55
0.04
3.96
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.36
0.03
^
©
1
422
1929
0
458
273
4
-3
1640
344
-38
37
1073
189
7
4847
18
1536
349
116
704
164
108
102
132
-27
35
-2
226
2017
245
533
45
27
168
166
9
15.02
14.86
15.04
14.44
12.99
15.03
15.04
14.74
15.01
15.01
14.91
11.82
14.96
11.71
14.88
15.03
14.85
9.09
12.54
14.73
15.00
11.67
14.99
14.91
14.64
13.26
15.02
14.65
14.95
12.16
14.99
15.02
15.02
14.79
15.02
E-ll
-------
Table E-2. Vehicle Descriptions and Selection RSMs for Eligible Non-Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
565
566
567
569
Reason for
Evaporative
Testing
Ineligibility
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Eligible
Year
1976
2005
1989
1998
Make
Ford
VW
Honda
Subaru
Model
Granada
Beetle
Civic
Legacy
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Selection
Selection
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
03SEP09:16:05:54
04SEP09: 10:21:02
04SEP09: 10:26:45
04SEP09:! 1:15:40
x
"8
o.
^
n
13
13
13
10
h-j
§
1
s
1
3
93
72
74
78
.
O
*1
202
88
91
116
pq
OJ
165
47
113
50
pq
to
s-
4
1
3
1
K
O
**
•d
•d
417
-30
134
74
K
O
SJ
•d
•d
254
-21
106
54
^
^
2.67
0.11
1.10
0.04
z
o
^
•d
•d
1,
404
28
590
43
_
o
_
^5
^^
13.12
14.98
14.24
15.02
1
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are forced to zero.
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are not forced to
zero.
E-12
-------
Appendix F
Descriptions and Data for Participating Vehicles
-------
-------
Appendix F provides selected data on the 175 vehicles whose drivers agreed to
participate in the intensive evaporative emissions portion of the project.
Table F-l provides descriptions of the participating vehicles. Besides model year, make,
and model, the table gives fuel metering type, Vehicle Emissions Control Information (VECI),
VIN stem, transmission type, fuel level, and odometer readings. The transcriptions for the blue-
background entries of the VECI information and VINs have been verified as correct by
examining digital photographs of the VECI labels and VIN stamps during the data quality-
control process. The use of the VIN stem for 1981 and newer vehicles, which is the first through
ninth plus eleventh digits of the VIN, allows the decoding of VINs while protecting the identity
of private vehicles.
Table F-2 provides information on the Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs. The
Combined PacketID in the first column provides linkage of the results to the Table F-l
information. Just as for ineligible vehicles and eligible non-participants, each participant was
assigned a Selection RSM EI23 Bin based on the EI23 value determined from the Selection RSM
raw data. Once a vehicle became a participant it typically received six Measurement RSMs -
duplicate RSMs at nominally 12, 34, and 55 mph. For each participant Table F-2 shows the
Selection and Measurement RSMs in chronological order. Additionally, some vehicles were sent
for evaporative emissions repairs. After repair these vehicles received two additional
Measurement RSMs at nominally 12 mph. These RSMs are also shown in Table F-2. The
Measurement RSMs and the after-repair results are not analyzed in this report and are simply
included in the appendices for completeness.
Table F-3 shows the results of the PSHED measurements that were performed on the
participating vehicles. Again, the Combined PacketID in the first column provides linkage of the
results to the Table F-l information. Also, the table includes after-repair PSHED measurements
for the vehicles that were sent for evaporative emissions repairs. The last column of the table
gives the hot-soak value in grams per quarter-hour (g/Qhr) as measured in the PSHED. The
model year, EI23 Bin, and PSHED from this table coupled with the targeting fractions by Evap
Index Bin and with solicitation response rates provide the information used to characterize the
distribution of PSHED values for the Ken Caryl fleet. These distributions will be determined in
Section 5.2.
Table F-4 provides the results of the Modified California Method and EVI gas cap
integrity inspection results for the participants. As the table shows, the MCM examined a variety
of locations on the vehicle's fuel handling and evaporative emissions control system. However,
in many cases some portions of these systems were not accessible for examination, for example,
because of shrouds or other components manufactured into the vehicle. In these instances the
table indicates NP for not performed. If the technician examining the vehicles recorded any
comments about the MCM inspection, they are presented in the table. The table also includes the
before-repair PSHED result for comparison with the MCM results.
F-l
-------
Table F-1. Descriptions of Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
7
9
17
18
20
21
25
27
28
34
39
42
44
45
46
48
49
53
57
62
64
68
69
75.096
77
79
82
85
91
92
93
95
100
103.122
108
109
110
112
Year
1998
1992
1993
2003
1990
1991
2000
1992
1989
1995
1994
1987
1989
1997
1990
1994
1994
1997
1996
2003
1976
2001
2002
1986
1987
1988
1993
1996
1977
1997
2003
1998
1984
1988
1995
1995
2005
1986
Make
Ford
Saturn
Mercury
VW
Nissan
Jeep
Audi
Jeep
Dodge
Ford
Jeep
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mazda
Pontiac
Ford
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Land Rover
Toyota
Saab
Chevrolet
Cadillac
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Nissan
Chevrolet
Toyota
Cadillac
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Model
Explorer
SL
Grand Marquis
Passat
Pathfinder
Wrangler
A6
Wrangler
Raider
Ranger
Grand Cherokee
Power Ram
Caprice
F150
Taurus
Camaro
929
Grand Am
Explorer XLT
Tundra
Omega
Wrangler
Freelander
MR2
900 Turbo
1500 Pickup
El Dorado
Ram 1500
Blazer
F150
Durango
Quest
Suburban
Camry
SLS
Avalon
Avalon
LTD
Fuel
Metering
Type
(C;F)
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
C
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
VECI
Year
1998
1992
1993
2003
1990
1991
2000
1992
1991
1995
1994
1987
1989
1997
1990
1994
1994
1997
1996
2003
2001
2002
1986
1987
1988
1993
1996
1997
2003
1998
1984
1988
1995
1995
2005
1986
VECI
Engine
Family
WFMXT04.0HAA
N4G1.9V5JPH5
PFM4.6V5FDF2
3 ADXVO 1.8342
LNS3.0T5FCF2
MCR2.5T5FEL3
YADXV02.8334
NCR2.5T5FEL4
MMT3.0T5FB16
SFM2.318GFEA
RCR5.288GAEA
HCR5.2T2HEM8
KIG5.7V5NEA4
VFM5.458GFEK
LFM3.0V5FXG5
R1G3.4V8GAEA
RTK3.0VJGFEA
VGM2.4VJGKEK
TFM4.028GKFK
3TYXTG4.7HBY
1CRXT04.0200
2LRXTO2.5001
GTY1.6V5FBB9
HSA2.0V5FTBX
J3G5.7T5TYA2
P1G4.6V8X8B9
TCR36OH8G1EK
VFM1160AYMFD
3CRXT04.75BO
WNSXT03.0A4A
EGM05.7ABB8
JTY2.0V5FBB8
S1G4.6VJGFEA
STY3.0VJGFEK
5TYXV03.5PEA
GFM3.8V5HHF9
VECI
Evap
Family
WFMXE0120BAE
NAO-4B
F3AE-9C485-JJT
3ADXR0140232
FI6-3
MT-2.5M-1P
YADXRO 140233
NT-2.5J-lSorNT-2.5M-lP
1
2.3L-SFM1045AYPOA
RCR1058AYPOA
HCRTX; HCRTY
KBO-1P
VFM1160AYMFD
FOAE-9C485UKB 3.0L-9HM
R1G1058AYMOA
RTK1078BYM03
VGM1095AYMEA
4.0L-TFM1120AYMED
3TYXR0190A30
1CRXE0101GCS
2LRXRO 124002
EV-E
None Listed
JFO-3C
PCO-1A
TCR1073AYPOB
VFM5.458GFEK
3CRXE0101GDH
WNSXE0057MAA
EV-E
S1G1089AYPOA
20020 1MZ-FE
5TYXR0130A11
E6AE9C485AER
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 9 and 11)
1FMZU34E1.Z
1G8ZG549X.Z
2MELM75W8.X
WVWPD63B1.P
JN8HD17YO.W
2J4FY19PO.J
WAUEH24BO.N
2J4FY19P8.J
JB7FJ43S9.J
1FTCR10A6.P
1J4GZ58Y6.C
1B7HW14TX.S
1G1BN51E1.R
1FTEX18LX.K
1FACP52U3.A
2G1FP22S4.2
JM1HD4619.0
1G2NE52T3.M
1FMDU32X1.U
5TBBT4417.S
1J4FA49S4.P
SALNY2221.A
JT2AW15C1.0
YS3AT35L6.2
1GCDK14K6.E
1G6EL12Y3.U
1B7HF16ZO.S
1FTEX18LO.K
1D4HS48NX.F
4N2ZN111X.D
1G8GK26MO.F
JT2SV22E6.3
1G6KS52YO.U
4T1GB10EX.U
4T1BK36BX.U
1FABP3930.G
Trans
Type
(M;A)
A
M
A
A
M
A
M
M
M
A
M
A
A
A
M
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Fuel
Gauge
(1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00)
0.25
0.75
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.50
0.75
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.25
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.25
Odometer
150752
183866
123479
90785
131594
186399
170206
123991
270017
250342
180985
22091
23960
81284
61972
127080
172864
151915
146781
91529
27334
117117
51650
164392
167729
108501
113203
215632
48390
97618
136907
203363
9014
192553
117743
216382
33990
22403
Odometer
Resolution
(5; 6)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
F-2
-------
Table F-1. Descriptions of Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
120
121
127
130
131
134
135
138
139
156
157
158
159
161
162.332
163
168
177
178
184
185
186
188
189
190
192
193
194
197
203.205
212
213
214
217
218
219
220
221
232
238
246
Year
1989
1994
1993
1995
1997
2003
2001
2002
2002
1999
1982
2005
1990
2001
1995
2002
1994
2004
1969
1998
2002
1995
2005
1993
2001
1991
2003
1994
2000
1991
1977
1979
2000
1994
1990
1991
1994
1994
1992
1993
2003
Make
Chevrolet
Isuzu
Jeep
Ford
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Suzuki
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mazda
Saturn
Jeep
Volvo
Saturn
Dodge
VW
vw
Toyota
Ford
Lexus
GMC
Ford
Infmiti
Ford
Geo
Honda
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
VW
Lexus
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Jeep
Chevrolet
Model
Camaro
Amigo
Cherokee
Explorer
Outback
Impala
Sebring
Vitara
Sunfire
Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
Cobalt
MX-6
SC-1
Wrangler
S60
SL2
Ram 1500
CP - Dunebuggy
Jetta
Echo
F150
GX-470
Safari
Expedition
Q45
Focus
Prizm
Accord
Wrangler
Econoline
D-150
S-10
Ranger
Cabriolet
LS400
Tacoma
Bronco
Explorer
Wrangler
Suburban
Fuel
Metering
Type
(C;F)
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
VECI
Year
1991
1994
1993
1995
1997
2003
2001
2002
1999
1982
2005
1990
2001
1995
2002
1994
2004
2002
1995
2005
1993
2001
1991
2003
1994
2000
1991
1977
1979
2000
1994
1990
1991
1994
1994
1992
1993
2003
VECI
Engine
Family
M1G5.7VANTA8
RSZ2.678GAFA
PCR4.0T5FGA5
SFM4.028GFEA
VFJ2.5VJGKEK
3GMXV03.8044
1DSXV03.0GNG
2SKXT1.59LC1
sticker damaged
4.0L.XFMXE0120BAE
CFM5.0T2AAF4
5GMXV02.2026
LTK2.2V5FFG3
1GMXV01.9002
SCR2.578GAEA
B15244T
R4G1.9VHGBEA
4CRXT05.75JO
2TYXV01.5FFA
SFM1045AYMOA
5TYXT04.7PKX
P3G4.3T5TAA6
1FMXT05.4RF8
MNS4.5V5FAA9
3FMXV02.0VH1
RNT1.6VHGAFA
YHNXV03.0FA3
MCR4.0T5FED1
9TD-360-2CP
YGMXT04.3182
RFM4.077GAEA
LVW1.8V5FWD7
MTY4.0V5FBB5
RTY3.087GAFA
RFM5.888GBJA
NFM4.0T5FYH8
PCR4.0T5FGA5
3GMXT05.3175
VECI
Evap
Family
MBO-1A
RSZ1046BYMOO
PTATR OR PTASS
4.0L-SFM1120AYMOB
VFJ1030BYMA3
3GMXR0124919
1DSXR0165A1F
2SKXE0089S56
XFMXT04.02GF
2DP
5GMXR0124919
J
1GMXR0080902
SCR1058AYMON and SCR1058AYPON
2VVXR0133AAA
R4G1035AGPOC
4CRXR0218GDH
2TYXR0075AK1
SFM5.888GBJA
5TYXR0190P30
PFO-3A
1FMXE0155BBG
F18-1
3FMXR0080BBE
RNT1047DYMOO
YHNXR0130AAA
MT-4.0M-1P
9K-7
YGMXE0095904
RFM1045AYPOA
LWC2
EV-SE
RTY1047DYMOO
RFM1045AYMOA
F2AE-9C485-HHA
PTAPR OR PTASS
3GMXE0133916
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 9 and 11)
1G1FP2189.L
JACCG07E2.9
1J4FJ28S7.L
1FMDU34X4.Z
4S3BG6853.6
2G1WH52K4.9
4C3AG52H4.E
2S3TD52V4.6
1G2JB1246.7
1FMDU34E4.Z
1FTDF15F8.P
1G1AK52F5.7
1YVGD31B8.5
1G8ZN1282.Z
1J4FY19P8.P
YV1RH58D0.2
1G8ZK5576.Z
1D7HU18D6.S
3VWTD81H8.M
JTDBT1239.5
1FTEX14HX.K
JTJBT20X7.0
1GDDM19Z2.B
1FMPU18L5.L
JNKNG01C7.M
1FAFP33P8.W
1Y1SK5361.Z
1HGCG2253.A
2J4FY29S7.J
1GCCT19W9.8
1FTCR10X7.P
WVWCB5158.K
JT8UF11E3.0
JT4VN13D0.5
1FMEU15H2.L
1FMDU34XO.U
1J4FY29S7.P
3GNFK16Z7.G
Trans
Type
(M;A)
A
M
A
M
M
A
M
M
A
A
A
A
M
M
M
A
A
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
M
M
A
M
A
A
A
M
M
A
M
A
A
M
A
Fuel
Gauge
(1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00)
0.25
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.75
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
Odometer
62617
151681
119955
161106
106677
61112
72977
89695
50442
141863
80147
50434
190264
94138
110145
58198
126153
51576
71185
53494
68028
147811
35753
212226
164049
202128
94337
162187
115971
108432
9900
91164
76888
70206
159869
96587
78987
163745
45600
48277
126891
Odometer
Resolution
(5; 6)
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
F-3
-------
Table F-1. Descriptions of Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
249
252
255
261
262
263
266
271
278
285
290
294
295
301
302
305
306
309
311
316
320
321
325
327
329
331
337
339
343
348.432
350
352
354
355
357
361
362
364
365
367
370
Year
1997
2002
2004
1994
1984
1997
2002
1997
2002
1998
2005
1985
1999
1981
1989
1997
1967
2001
2002
2003
2004
1997
2000
1981
1969
1994
2001
1994
1991
1990
2005
2001
1989
1993
1997
1995
2001
1995
2002
1993
2003
Make
BMW
Toyota
Lexus
GMC
Nissan
Honda
Chevrolet
GMC
Dodge
Honda
Acura
Ford
Mazda
GMC
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Nissan
VW
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
Jeep
Chevrolet
Nissan
Toyota
VW
Dodge
Subaru
Chevrolet
Jeep
Toyota
Nissan
VW
Audi
Buick
Ford
Chevrolet
Land Rover
Model
328i
Tacoma
RX330
Suburban
720
Accord
Tahoe
Sierra
Dakota
CRV
TSX
F150
626
Sierra Kl 500
Pickup
Ram 1500
Chevelle
Sentra
Passat
Accent
Cavalier
S-10
Prizm
320i
Commando
Blazer
Xterra
4Runner
Golf
Ram Charger
Outback
Astro
Cherokee
Corolla
Pathfinder
Golf
TT Quatro
Roadmaster
Mustang
Van 20 / G20
Discovery
Fuel
Metering
Type
(C;F)
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
VECI
Year
1997
2002
2004
1994
1984
1997
2002
1997
2002
1998
2005
1985
1999
1981
1989
1997
2001
2002
2003
2004
1997
2000
1981
1994
2001
1994
1991
2005
2001
1989
1993
1997
1995
2001
1995
2002
1993
2003
VECI
Engine
Family
VBM2.8VJGKEK
2TYXT03.4FFP
4TYXT03.3PEM
R3G5.785GAEB
ENS2.4T2AAFO
VHN2.2VJGKFK
2GMXT05.3188
VGM5.75PGFEK
2CRXT04.72D1
WHNXT02.0UF1
5HNXV02.4KBP
FFM5.8T2HGG1
XTKXV02.0VBA
18L4HANA
KCR3.9T5HFM9
VCR5.968GFEK
1NSXV01.8D1A
2ADXV02.8334
3HYXV01.6BLS
4GMXV02.2025
VGM2.218G1EK
YNTXV01.8FFA
R3G4.329GFEA
1NSXT03.3C5A
RTY3.087GAFA
MVW1.8V5FWB6
5FJXX02.5MJS
1GMXT04.3181
KAM242T5LND8
PTY1.8V5FFD9
VNS3.328G2EK
SVW2.0V8GFEA
1ADXV01.8336
S1G5.7V8GAEA
2FMXV03.8VFB
P3G5.7T5TYA8
3LRXT04.6001
VECI
Evap
Family
VBM1156AYPEO
2TYXR0135AKO
4TYXR0165P21
R3G1085AYMOA
4CAB-3
VHN1090AYMEA
2GMXE0133915
VGM1098AYMBA
2CRXE0101GCS
WHNXE0080AAB
5HNXR0140BBA
5FAE-9C4G5
XTKXR0125BFA
1D4D-8
KCRTD
VCR1073AYPBB
1NSXR0085RCA
2ADXRO 140233
3HYXR0105PEA
4GMXR0124919
VGM1095AYMEA
YNTXR0115AK1
R3G1058AYMON
1NSXR0120RCA
RTY1047DYMOO
VAP
5FJXR01253CJ
1GMXE0212924
KT-242H-1S
EV-E
VNS1110AYMEA
SVW1045BYPOV
1ADXR0130242
S1G1058AYPOF
2FMXR0105BAE
PFO-3C
3LRXEO 124001
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 9 and 11)
WBABK832X.E
5TEHN72N3.Z
JTJHA31U4.0
1GKFK16K5.J
JN6ND06Y1.W
1HGCD7130.A
1GNEK13Z7.J
2GTEK19R6.1
1B7GG42N6.S
JHLRD186X.C
JH4CL9684.C
1FTDF15F9.P
1YVGF22C7.5
1GTEK14H2.J
1B7GG26X5.S
3B7HF13Z3.G
3N1CB51D9.L
WVWTH63BO.P
KMHCF35CO.U
1G1JF52F2.7
1GCCS1440.K
1Y1SK5481.Z
WBAAG3304.8
1GNDT13W8.2
5N1ED28Y7.C
JT3VN39W1.0
3VWFA21G6.M
3B4GM07Y3.M
4S4BP61C2.7
1GNEL19W8.B
1J4FJ58LX.L
1NXAE09E8.Z
JN8AR05Y5.W
3VWFC81H6.M
TRUUT28N3.1
1G4BN52P9.R
1FAFP4041.F
1GBEG25K5.F
SALTL1644.A
Trans
Type
(M;A)
A
A
A
A
M
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
M
A
M
M
M
A
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
M
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
Fuel
Gauge
(1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00)
0.75
0.50
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.25
0.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
0.75
0.50
Odometer
115006
100762
51333
163611
116994
91510
145201
132808
153682
166819
70166
93586
108547
81898
184015
147531
44500
101164
64049
104439
62915
130259
122120
342673
88099
195091
100174
213353
251793
217996
40203
108973
171562
164799
166353
90050
75014
58162
95551
193004
97938
Odometer
Resolution
(5; 6)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
•
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
.
6
6
6
F-4
-------
Table F-1. Descriptions of Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
371
375
379
381
383
385
387
391
392
393
395
396
397
401
402
404
405
416
420
424
425
427
428
430
431
437
438
439
454
460
466
468
469
475
481
482
486
489
494
497
498
Year
1996
2005
1993
1998
1994
2001
2000
1999
1999
2001
1997
2000
2005
1995
2004
1998
1996
1999
1996
1970
1998
1984
1975
2002
1993
1991
1975
1998
1988
2003
2003
2004
2000
2000
2003
1992
1993
1991
1995
1994
1998
Make
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Jeep
Chevrolet
Dodge
Jeep
Isuzu
Honda
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Ford
Lexus
Hyundai
Isuzu
Chevrolet
Mazda
Jeep
VW
Mitsubishi
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Mitsubishi
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Pontiac
BMW
Dodge
Acura
Subaru
Nissan
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Jeep
Ford
Mazda
Buick
Honda
Model
Corolla
Focus
Legacy
Cherokee
S-10
Dakota
Grand Cherokee
Rodeo
Accord
Solara
S-10
Mystique
Freestyle
SC300
Elantra
Rodeo
Cavalier
Protege
Grand Cherokee
Beetle
Eclipse
Land Cruiser
C-10
Wrangler
3000 GT
S-10
C-10
Grand Prix
M6
Durango
RSX
Outback
Pathfinder
Astro
Frontier
Stanza
Cherokee
Bronco
MX-6
Century
Accord
Fuel
Metering
Type
(C;F)
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
C
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
VECI
Year
1996
2005
1998
1994
2001
1999
1999
1997
2000
2005
1995
2004
1998
1996
1999
1996
1970
1998
1984
1975
2002
1993
1991
1975
1998
1988
2003
2003
2004
2000
2000
2003
1992
1993
1991
1995
1994
1998
VECI
Engine
Family
TTY1.8VJGFFK
5FMXV02.31D4
WCRXT0242220
R3G4.375GAEA
1CRXT04.72D2
XSZXT03.52EK
XHNXV03.0FF1
VGM4.31PGKEK
YFMXV02.5VBC
5FMXV03.02EC
STY3.0VJGAFA
4HYXV02.0XW4
WSZXT03.52EK
TGM2.2V8GKEK
XTKXV01.6VBA
TCR4.028GKEK
ETY4.2T2AFF4
350 cid; 2bbl
2CRXT04.02D2
PMT3.0V5FF26
M3G4.3T5XEB2
GM113350cid
WGMXV03.1041
JBM3.5V5FMS4
3CRXTO5.95B2
3HNXV02.0XKC
4FJXV02.5NKR
YNSXT03.325A
YGMXT04.3183
3NSXT03.3C6A
NNS2.4V5FAAX
PCR4.0T5FGA5
STK2.0VJ6FEA
R1G3.4V8GAEA
WHNXV02.3PA3
VECI
Evap
Family
TTY1047DYMAO
5FMXR0120GAK
WCRXE0101G2S
R3G1108WYMOC
1CRXE0101GCH
XSZXT0095MEO
XHNXR0130AAA
VGM1095AYMEA
YFMXR0115BBE
5FMXR0185GBK
STY1080DYMOO
4HYXR0148PDX
WSZXT0095MEO
TGM1089AYMEA
XTKXR0125BFB
TCR1073AYPBP
EV-F
2CRXE0101GCS
IF
MBO-3E
WGMXR0133918
EV50
3CRXE0101GDH
3HNXR0099AAA
4FJXR01254CE
YNSXE0110MBA
YGMXE01 11911
3NSXR0120MAA
F14-2
PTAPR
STK1065BYP02
R1G1058AYMOA
WHNXR0130AAA
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 9 and 11)
1NXBA02E3.Z
3FAFP37N7.R
4S3BC6331.9
1J4GZ48S4.C
1GCCT14Z2.8
1B7GG2AN6.S
1J4GW48N8.C
4S2CM58W5.4
1HGCG1652.A
2T1CF22P1.C
1GCCS19X7.8
1MEFM66LO.K
1FMZK0215.G
JT8JZ31C9.0
KMHDN46D3.U
4S2CM58W9.4
1G1JC5241.7
JM1BJ2224.0
1J4GZ58S5.C
4A3AK44Y7.E
JT3FJ60GX.O
1J4FA39S5.P
JA3BM64J3.Y
1GCCT19Z2.2
1G2WJ52M7.F
WBAEE1411.2
1D8HS78Z3.F
JH4DC548X.C
4S3BH6750.6
JN8AR07Y2.W
1GNEL19W1.B
1N6MD29Y1.C
JN1FU21P9.T
1J4GZ58S9.C
1FMEU15H2.L
1YVGE31C1.5
1G4AG55M6.6
1HGCG5555 A
Trans
Type
(M;A)
A
A
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
M
M
M
A
M
M
A
A
A
M
A
A
M
A
A
A
A
A
M
M
A
M
Fuel
Gauge
(1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00)
1.00
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.50
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.00
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.00
0.75
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.00
0.75
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.50
Odometer
115405
74792
146307
119882
155277
114101
113318
146398
102999
85136
135474
107568
58994
97225
97587
133367
137833
117953
162205
3141
108341
167153
63242
56704
115444
205451
42455
151899
23065
83160
29398
71196
101775
131985
57875
127769
106403
49350
204521
107759
197136
Odometer
Resolution
(5; 6)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
F-5
-------
Table F-1. Descriptions of Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
504
507
512
517
521
527
540
542
546
547
550
559
563
568
Year
1992
2001
2005
1999
1994
1995
1998
1986
1996
1975
1992
1989
1998
1997
Make
Ford
Toyota
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Nissan
Eagle
Honda
Subaru
Geo
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobile
Ford
Saturn
Model
F150
Sequoia
Santa Fe
Lumina
Sentra
Talon
Accord
GL10
Prizm
Ranger F250
Taurus
Regency
Taurus
SL1
Fuel
Metering
Type
(C;F)
F
F
F
F
•
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
VECI
Year
1992
2001
2005
1999
1994
1995
1986
1996
1975
1992
1989
1998
1997
VECI
Engine
Family
NFM5.8T5HZC1
1TYXT04.7JBW
5HYXT03.5MM5
XGMXV03.4041
RNS1.6VJGFEA
SDS2.0VJGFEA
GFJ1.8V5HCNX
TNT1.8VJGFFK
NFM3.8V5FJF9
K2G3.8V8XEBI
WFMXV03.0NAA
VGM1.9VJGKEK
VECI
Evap
Family
F2AE-9C485
1TYXE0190AFO
5HYXR0175PES
XGMXE0095904
RNS1030BYMOA
SDS1062AYMOH
MU
TNT1047DYMAO
KBO-2D
WFMXE0115BAE
VGM1035AYPAA
VIN Stem
(digits 1 to 9 and 11)
1FTEX14N8.K
5TDBT44A3.S
KM8SC73EX.U
2G1WL52M8.9
JN1EB31P2.U
4E3AK44Y7.E
1HGCG5643.A
JF2AN55B4.D
1Y1SK5264.Z
1FALP5347.A
1G3CW54C6.1
1FAFP53S2.A
1G8ZK5275.Z
Trans
Type
(M;A)
A
A
A
A
M
A
M
A
A
A
A
Fuel
Gauge
(1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00)
1.00
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.50
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.75
0.00
Odometer
189852
129155
93921
110145
125478
143162
146347
157417
103065
6780
70615
348697
48551
104441
Odometer
Resolution
(5; 6)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
6
F-6
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
Year
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
Make
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
VW
vw
VW
vw
vw
Model
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
DateTime
29JUN09:09:29:15
29JUN09: 10:47:22
29JUN09:10:53:34
29JUN09: 10:59:55
29JUN09:! 1:13:18
29JUN09: 11:21:07
29 JUN09: 11:25:47
29JUN09: 11:42:38
29JUN09: 11:45:02
29JUN09:09:52:47
29JUN09:13:22:42
29JUN09:13:24:54
29JUN09:13:29:48
29JUN09:13:31:05
29JUN09:13:43:42
29JUN09:13:45:36
07JUL09:09:18:33
07JUL09:09:20:45
29JUN09:13:08:21
29JUN09:15:00:21
29JUN09:15:03:12
29JUN09:15:13:21
29JUN09:15:19:17
29JUN09: 15:21: 18
29 JUN09: 15:37:29
29JUN09:15:39:17
06JUL09:09:36:41
06JUL09:09:38:00
29JUN09:15:01:43
29JUN09:16:55:27
29JUN09: 17:01:09
29JUN09:17:03:29
29JUN09:17:09:15
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
11
36
38
37
51
38
52
10
10
14
52
38
51
36
10
10
11
12
12
54
38
40
51
38
10
9
11
14
12
40
50
36
51
VSP (kW/Mg)
7
19
21
19
18
19
-5
5
6
5
17
18
20
19
7
4
8
12
6
16
17
22
19
18
3
7
5
14
14
21
7
22
10
Temperature (F)
77
89
89
89
87
90
87
89
89
81
90
90
90
90
94
94
76
76
93
91
93
88
91
89
96
96
78
78
97
92
89
92
89
oj
55
252
247
214
279
354
125
125
80
3828
420
637
313
496
14595
1098
312
242
1589
224
272
295
205
340
5071
2227
56
45
4958
368
174
298
242
EI23 Bin
1
4
4
4
5
5
3
3
2
7
5
5
4
5
2
6
5
4
7
4
4
4
4
5
7
7
1
1
7
5
4
5
4
O
h-t
1
20
27
38
139
139
129
28
24
2
2877
3455
2533
9868
4832
445
5501
475
638
1490
955
1568
10304
7710
949
1105
10939
344
314
O
i-j
1
10
-202
-247
-108
81
-115
-184
6
9
18755
2866
3098
4293
2477
-7130
5350
-173
40
1565
188
520
1007
317
1069
3749
5520
760
1023
8943
170
112
110
-7
O
0
h-t
9
0.16
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.15
0.02
0.01
0.13
0.19
0.09
0.55
0.68
0.38
3.97
0.65
0.06
0.05
0.40
0.12
2.31
2.69
3.41
2.08
1.00
-0.04
-0.03
§
h-t
!
34
121
212
191
113
2
165
127
297
2001
462
174
1051
521
326
584
284
603
919
263
729
686
1106
526
1582
34
25
57
/— s
^
14.94
15.01
15.02
15.02
15.02
15.00
14.94
15.03
15.04
14.80
14.79
14.90
14.32
14.41
14.76
12.02
14.56
14.97
14.94
14.73
14.89
13.06
12.85
12.56
13.47
14.01
15.07
15.07
F-7
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
18
18
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
Year
2003
2003
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1989
1989
1989
Make
VW
vw
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Model
Passat
Passat
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
A6
A6
A6
A6
A6
A6
A6
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Raider
Raider
Raider
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
29JUN09: 17:20:36
29JUN09: 17:22:58
29 JUN09: 15:27:48
30JUN09:09:22:19
30JUN09:09:51:02
30JUN09: 10:09:59
30JUN09: 10: 18:33
30JUN09: 10:24:46
30JUN09: 10:38:36
30JUN09: 10:41:21
30JUN09:08: 11:07
30JUN09: 10:49:49
30JUN09: 10:56:07
30JUN09: 11:09:47
30JUN09:! 1:16:04
30JUN09:11:30:18
30JUN09: 11:32:09
30JUN09: 11:46:34
30JUN09:13:21:06
30JUN09:13:27:19
30JUN09:13:33:31
30JUN09:13:39:51
30JUN09:13:54:41
30JUN09:13:57:10
30JUN09:13:00:47
30JUN09:15:09:21
30JUN09: 15: 17:30
30JUN09: 15:23:25
30JUN09: 15:3 1:05
30JUN09:15:42:12
30JUN09: 15:44:31
06JUL09:10:16:17
06JUL09:10:18:09
30JUN09: 14:00:00
30JUN09: 16:49:22
30JUN09:16:51:25
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
10
12
10
34
35
36
51
55
14
13
8
34
38
53
53
10
9
11
39
39
57
52
12
12
10
39
38
53
52
10
14
12
12
11
49
36
VSP (kW/Mg)
5
8
8
7
24
25
42
47
-1
0
5
16
18
25
29
5
4
7
20
22
30
39
6
9
11
12
19
16
-4
7
11
8
7
7
-5
17
Temperature (F)
95
95
97
86
88
90
88
90
00
00
88
69
86
85
92
92
92
92
93
93
92
92
92
100
99
96
93
92
92
92
99
99
83
83
99
89
94
oj
84
74
97
193
236
242
165
319
80
64
377
322
200
167
179
110
489
354
322
325
338
299
112
92
1633
229
206
310
222
770
561
57
85
668
169
453
EI23 Bin
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
2
2
5
5
4
4
4
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
2
7
4
4
5
4
7
6
1
2
6
4
5
O
©
•3
37
83
26
101
154
168
281
26
39
1435
149
167
311
424
545
1875
565
347
490
233
374
449
2273
178
529
2369
4442
1635
608
451
1086
453
474
O
s>
©
•3
31
16
-17
-177
37
62
307
154
-28
-9
431
8
113
254
259
240
990
422
-99
265
483
188
78
295
-4867
-21
191
1317
2418
-4988
-1427
527
362
804
371
659
O
0
9
0.04
0.05
0.03
1.22
1.15
1.82
2.94
0.08
0.10
-0.04
0.21
0.30
2 42
1.58
0.11
0.06
0.53
0.00
0.28
2.91
0.03
0.06
0.48
0.13
0.09
3.20
0.55
0.30
0.96
0.41
0.75
0.64
0.28
^
©
1
31
0
-27
45
99
724
1420
86
84
335
930
860
1040
1652
271
1146
64
16
50
13
23
11
1088
1034
1265
1886
415
1327
2362
2335
167
2659
1597
9
15.02
15.01
15.03
14.17
14.22
13.72
12.89
14.99
14.98
15.03
14.86
14.80
13.27
13.85
14.95
14.92
14.65
15.05
14.84
12.96
15.02
15.00
14.60
14.92
14.93
12.62
14.51
14.74
14.26
14.66
14.48
14.48
14.78
F-8
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
28
28
28
28
28
28
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Year
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
Make
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Model
Raider
Raider
Raider
Raider
Raider
Raider
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Power Ram
Power Ram
Power Ram
Power Ram
Power Ram
Power Ram
Power Ram
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
30JUN09: 16:59:29
30JUN09:17:05:45
30JUN09: 17: 17:48
30JUN09: 17: 19:58
02JUL09:10:31:17
02JUL09: 10:34:08
01JUL09:11:13:20
01JUL09: 12:42:20
01JUL09: 12:49:39
01JUL09: 13:02:15
01JUL09: 13:08:27
01JUL09: 13:23:10
01JUL09: 13:24:42
07JUL09: 13:05:43
07JUL09: 13:07:04
01JUL09:16:01:08
02JUL09:09:15:17
02JUL09:09:17:18
02JUL09:09:23:29
02JUL09:09:28:24
02JUL09:09:39:31
02JUL09:09:41:48
06JUL09: 10:08:24
06JUL09: 12:02:55
06JUL09: 12:05:48
06JUL09: 12:09:10
06JUL09: 12: 11:58
06JUL09: 12:19:17
06JUL09: 12:3 1:05
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
37
53
10
9
12
10
12
33
34
51
51
13
11
10
10
11
51
39
38
51
11
10
13
39
39
13
VSP (kW/Mg)
20
8
6
3
10
11
11
11
7
35
35
13
10
4
5
8
7
20
20
33
8
8
11
23
11
8
Temperature (F)
95
89
93
93
81
81
90
97
97
92
92
100
100
89
89
89
76
77
77
78
78
78
82
83
86
83
86
83
92
oj
254
143
251
272
128
113
363
215
553
201
299
200
346
82
92
112
168
320
225
242
75
74
177
451
359
115
485
521
325
EI23 Bin
4
3
4
5
3
3
5
4
6
4
5
4
5
2
3
3
4
5
4
4
2
2
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
O
©
•3
248
646
760
609
56
232
1423
1253
725
547
469
551
649
336
194
55
55
96
164
96
123
793
2625
1042
905
532
1607
996
O
s>
©
•3
115
518
255
-191
-1
171
922
661
400
580
329
461
576
199
108
-3
143
-39
-48
149
67
81
734
1257
1304
817
349
1114
939
O
0
9
0.41
2.67
0.31
0.02
0.09
0.72
0.11
0.08
0.10
5.92
1.66
0.59
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.08
0.16
0.17
5.87
0.23
0.13
7.92
9.51
6.48
10.26
4.28
9.47
10.86
^
©
1
1201
2076
231
1094
1248
501
144
76
88
158
402
43
36
-1
26
435
585
761
389
771
384
347
445
721
267
732
554
186
9
14.71
13.05
14.80
14.98
14.94
14.51
14.92
14.96
14.96
10.79
13.84
14.61
15.01
15.01
15.02
14.98
14.92
14.90
10.83
14.86
14.94
9.34
8.14
10.35
7.66
11.94
8.20
7.23
F-9
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
42
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
Year
1987
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
Make
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Model
Power Ram
Caprice
Caprice
Caprice
Caprice
Caprice
Caprice
Caprice
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
929
929
929
929
929
929
929
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
06JUL09: 12:35:37
06JUL09: 12:09:27
06JUL09: 15:33:11
06JUL09: 15:36:54
06JUL09:15:41:34
06JUL09: 15:44:52
06JUL09: 15:52:49
06JUL09: 15:54:22
06JUL09: 12: 14:31
06JUL09: 14:09:03
06JUL09: 14: 12:52
06JUL09: 14: 15:37
06JUL09: 14: 19:06
06JUL09: 14:3 1:04
06JUL09: 14:32:32
06JUL09: 12:27:16
06JUL09: 16:09:17
06JUL09: 16: 12:51
06JUL09: 16: 17:04
06JUL09: 16:20:43
06JUL09: 16:26:59
06JUL09: 16:27:50
06JUL09: 13:04:52
06JUL09: 17:03:22
06JUL09: 17: 15:02
06JUL09: 17:23:03
06JUL09: 17:23:58
08JUL09: 14:30:28
08JUL09: 14:32:30
06JUL09: 13:34:29
07JUL09: 10:57:55
07JUL09: 10:59:37
07JUL09: 11:04:27
07JUL09: 11:07:04
07JUL09: 11:1 1:49
07JUL09: 11:13:23
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
12
13
34
52
34
51
13
13
15
54
40
55
39
11
11
9
36
53
38
53
12
12
10
41
12
12
11
12
12
53
37
55
38
55
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
6
8
15
14
16
13
5
4
19
26
22
10
21
6
6
6
11
18
14
7
3
3
5
13
2
2
5
9
5
19
11
20
12
24
17
Temperature (F)
93
90
93
89
90
89
91
91
90
90
83
90
83
95
91
92
89
88
89
88
87
87
97
87
81
82
82
105
105
100
86
89
86
92
87
92
oj
127
925
161
149
140
326
373
268
52
213
104
207
87
46
101
58
72
162
68
170
404
320
1067
185
81
96
347
78
114
1069
131
330
241
354
225
334
EI23 Bin
3
6
3
3
3
5
5
4
1
4
3
4
2
1
3
2
2
4
2
4
5
5
7
4
2
3
5
2
3
7
3
5
4
5
4
5
O
©
•3
398
4444
1311
575
1024
1540
2057
-25
278
-1
128
16
10
39
16
11
-8
825
636
196
78
89
35
513
142
222
1188
564
773
426
1212
O
s>
©
•3
280
3464
851
439
201
689
1024
636
75
203
28
-18
-101
-124
132
44
6
73
-13
91
992
520
-133
12
-50
9
-360
108
205
725
572
575
187
693
349
661
O
0
9
2.47
0.12
0.11
0.81
1.24
0.21
0.15
-0.03
0.29
0.04
0.10
0.04
0.05
0.15
0.16
0.07
0.03
0.09
0.06
0.07
0.47
0.45
0.21
1.20
0.63
2.33
0.37
0.45
0.60
3.90
0.21
^
©
1
821
2021
1992
813
1186
939
1190
2812
745
126
493
704
107
365
20
56
140
8
-23
9
1303
327
18
39
76
68
1384
2451
1028
1281
1157
9
13.24
14.76
14.86
14.42
14.09
14.82
14.84
14.98
14.81
15.02
14.96
15.00
15.02
14.93
14.94
15.00
15.03
14.96
14.99
15.00
14.67
14.72
14.90
14.18
14.59
13.37
14.71
14.62
14.57
12.20
14.83
F-10
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
49
49
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
68
68
68
68
68
68
Year
1994
1994
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
1976
1976
1976
1976
1976
1976
1976
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Make
Mazda
Mazda
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Model
929
929
Grand Am
Grand Am
Grand Am
Grand Am
Grand Am
Grand Am
Grand Am
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Explorer XLT
Tundra
Tundra
Tundra
Tundra
Tundra
Tundra
Tundra
Omega
Omega
Omega
Omega
Omega
Omega
Omega
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
07JUL09: 11:21:34
07JUL09: 11:22:31
06JUL09: 15:36:16
07JUL09:09:01:06
07JUL09:09:03:16
07JUL09:09:08:08
07JUL09:09: 10:49
07JUL09:09:19:14
07JUL09:09:21:08
07JUL09:09:13:10
07JUL09: 11:47:04
07JUL09: 11:5 1:50
07JUL09: 11:54:33
07JUL09: 11:59:21
07JUL09: 12:06:38
07JUL09: 12:07:49
07JUL09: 16:02:53
07JUL09: 16:59:07
07JUL09: 17:04:49
07JUL09: 17:07: 11
07JUL09: 17: 12:52
07JUL09: 17:25:16
07JUL09: 17:26:55
08JUL09: 11:02:59
08JUL09: 12:55:52
08JUL09: 13:03:19
08JUL09: 13:16:51
08JUL09: 13:30:45
08JUL09: 13:38:33
08JUL09: 13:39:37
09JUL09:09:23:27
09JUL09: 10:29:31
09JUL09: 10:34:14
09JUL09: 10:35:50
09JUL09: 10:40:25
09JUL09: 10:48:24
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
12
13
14
55
36
56
38
13
11
12
36
50
33
53
14
12
10
37
56
37
55
12
11
12
39
38
52
52
12
11
12
35
56
36
55
10
VSP (kW/Mg)
10
11
20
31
13
8
18
6
5
11
22
0
14
27
5
6
7
19
24
19
25
7
7
13
18
16
27
12
8
7
11
19
24
19
24
9
Temperature (F)
92
92
93
80
79
81
79
76
76
76
90
88
86
88
91
91
94
85
88
84
88
87
87
92
93
93
91
92
104
104
76
74
78
75
78
78
oj
458
1448
438
180
498
157
189
127
135
68
311
112
308
166
69
75
35
153
120
343
181
54
64
640
328
242
233
196
3835
1209
115
288
183
453
265
94
EI23 Bin
5
7
5
4
6
4
4
3
3
2
5
3
5
4
2
2
1
4
3
5
4
1
2
6
5
4
4
4
7
7
3
5
4
5
4
3
O
©
•3
1059
1656
1072
383
533
480
334
131
281
-8
165
27
45
8
33
-37
67
67
181
68
-19
4
2145
698
1072
938
1166
2608
3287
89
289
203
560
186
106
O
s>
©
•3
650
793
741
304
-552
311
245
72
144
-14
-67
-56
-205
-100
15
34
-46
-198
-3
-210
45
-5
-29
-1320
706
785
971
1167
1467
1249
55
-290
94
230
63
128
O
0
9
0.61
0.64
2.66
4.31
0.55
1.66
0.17
0.09
0.12
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.72
0.00
0.13
0.02
0.26
0.08
0.02
0.22
0.12
-0.01
5.98
8.58
5.64
11.55
7.93
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.07
0.42
0.03
0.31
0.10
^
©
1
1471
2256
1166
1855
127
1732
317
404
299
188
181
29
71
-7
-6
144
-8
123
-47
86
590
464
40
77
-22
60
155
71
456
-48
128
161
-37
125
-2
9
14.53
14.46
13.07
11.88
14.64
13.79
14.91
14.97
14.95
15.02
14.99
15.05
14.54
15.05
14.96
15.03
14.86
14.99
15.03
14.89
14.95
15.04
10.70
8.88
10.98
6.75
9.33
14.86
14.83
14.94
14.99
14.74
15.02
14.82
14.98
F-ll
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
68
69
69
69
69
69
75.096
75.096
75.096
75.096
75.096
75.096
75.096
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
82
82
82
82
Year
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1993
1993
1993
1993
Make
Jeep
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Saab
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Model
Wrangler
Freelander
Freelander
Freelander
Freelander
Freelander
MR2
MR2
MR2
MR2
MR2
MR2
MR2
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
El Dorado
El Dorado
El Dorado
El Dorado
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
DateTime
09JUL09: 10:49:36
08JUL09: 15:30:02
08JUL09:17:15:35
08JUL09:17:17:13
08JUL09: 17:22:49
08JUL09: 17:25:11
09JUL09: 13:33:45
09JUL09: 15: 15:01
09JUL09: 15:20:47
09JUL09: 15:23:03
09JUL09: 15:36:41
09JUL09: 15:44:33
09JUL09: 15:46:34
09JUL09: 15:28:26
09JUL09: 17:03:10
09JUL09: 17:08:48
09JUL09: 17: 11:20
09JUL09: 17:32:49
09JUL09: 17:39:56
09JUL09: 17:41:05
15JUL09: 12:59:18
15JUL09: 13:00:11
10JUL09: 11:32:02
10JUL09: 13:14:51
10JUL09: 13:28:18
10JUL09: 13:30:51
10JUL09: 13:43:12
10JUL09: 13:44:34
10JUL09: 13:54:50
10JUL09: 13:56:22
16JUL09:09:15:11
16JUL09:09:17:19
10JUL09: 13:13:51
10JUL09: 15:03:42
10JUL09: 15:04:58
10JUL09: 15: 11:28
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
11
13
52
35
50
35
9
36
51
37
51
12
12
10
34
49
36
51
12
11
11
11
11
55
55
39
53
39
12
11
14
17
17
56
34
55
VSP (kW/Mg)
10
8
17
17
11
15
9
27
24
26
34
9
11
9
17
10
16
-27
10
10
8
7
7
6
0
20
27
17
8
7
7
21
28
23
18
18
Temperature (F)
78
103
90
96
90
96
94
84
86
81
86
95
95
97
79
84
79
85
85
85
87
87
91
92
92
89
93
92
100
100
80
80
97
93
94
93
oj
91
57
252
251
157
172
181
294
139
337
154
195
222
10087
271
325
304
138
369
595
96
111
298
230
1765
330
168
425
1519
2673
1758
120
55
171
287
227
EI23 Bin
3
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
5
3
4
4
7
4
5
5
3
5
6
3
3
5
4
7
5
4
5
7
7
7
3
1
4
5
4
O
©
•3
45
19
205
249
79
215
811
1345
1263
1034
1024
1004
1003
9399
329
212
282
223
1450
1339
158
126
635
489
1147
679
396
986
3871
3636
3087
194
276
260
271
385
O
s>
©
•3
-2
25
103
97
3
220
728
1225
1111
943
755
906
943
7434
200
79
221
115
995
1361
117
67
-21
188
679
186
330
-73
-1673
-1624
4911
150
263
284
178
233
O
0
9
0.02
0.28
1.76
0.02
0.66
0.04
1.32
1.98
2.53
1.66
2.40
3.87
3.08
0.49
0.36
0.09
0.54
0.04
0.21
0.19
0.47
0.27
0.53
2.23
6.61
0.42
7.80
0.47
0.61
0.25
1.34
0.52
4.89
6.41
0.08
5.16
^
©
1
1
56
867
4
72
-10
1564
2298
1639
1812
1712
835
1178
1097
825
1497
858
763
1396
1159
1392
1332
727
881
705
985
280
1136
927
995
1389
2095
56
71
262
-38
9
15.04
14.85
13.75
15.03
14.58
15.02
14.03
13.51
13.14
13.77
13.24
12.22
12.77
14.38
14.76
14.93
14.63
14.99
14.81
14.83
14.66
14.81
14.63
13.41
10.26
14.70
9.44
14.65
14.47
14.73
13.95
14.60
11.54
10.45
14.98
11.34
F-12
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
82
82
82
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
95
95
95
Year
1993
1993
1993
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
1998
1998
1998
Make
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Model
El Dorado
El Dorado
El Dorado
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Quest
Quest
Quest
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
10JUL09: 15: 13:03
10JUL09: 15:23:05
10JUL09: 15:24:38
10JUL09: 14:43:13
16JUL09: 12:08:15
16JUL09: 12:10:16
16JUL09: 12: 17:57
16JUL09: 12:21:53
16JUL09: 12:28:03
16JUL09: 12:29:29
14JUL09:08:55:37
15JUL09: 10:38:25
15JUL09: 10:42:00
15JUL09: 10:44:21
15JUL09: 10:49:23
15JUL09: 10:54:55
15JUL09: 10:55:55
24JUL09:09:45:55
24JUL09:09:50:51
14JUL09:09:28:56
14JUL09: 10:44:57
14JUL09: 10:46:50
14JUL09: 10:5 1:32
14JUL09: 10:53:09
14JUL09:11:05:14
14JUL09: 11:06:20
14JUL09: 10:35:29
14JUL09: 13:00:55
14JUL09: 13:01:51
14JUL09: 13:06:35
14JUL09: 13:08:12
14JUL09: 13:17:57
14JUL09: 13:19:05
14JUL09: 12:05:02
15JUL09:08:58:14
15JUL09:09:01:58
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
35
12
11
11
32
55
57
34
12
10
16
53
39
55
38
12
12
13
14
14
55
36
56
37
11
10
15
54
35
55
38
12
11
14
55
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
19
7
6
9
12
17
27
16
6
5
16
21
12
12
8
6
6
7
8
17
9
19
23
18
3
3
12
16
17
19
20
8
6
13
32
11
Temperature (F)
93
102
102
102
87
89
89
86
94
94
73
74
68
74
71
76
76
85
85
78
83
85
83
85
85
85
83
86
92
86
91
95
95
89
70
76
oj
333
96
98
1521
345
185
298
375
265
404
408
158
183
145
341
323
901
122
138
148
136
273
112
286
73
96
70
219
432
179
373
87
79
111
154
295
EI23 Bin
5
3
3
7
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
3
4
3
5
5
6
3
3
4
3
5
3
5
2
3
2
4
5
4
5
2
2
6
3
5
O
©
•3
350
32
79
1070
613
198
206
666
366
413
857
458
457
584
381
710
1280
230
290
69
233
57
510
31
22
47
25
102
74
170
9
9
663
356
754
O
s>
©
•3
-12
35
36
513
83
362
52
583
145
-51
844
387
452
417
233
737
1206
197
290
-546
-136
-272
-58
-288
-88
-95
17
-67
-90
35
-22
5
-37
52
384
704
O
0
9
-0.02
0.19
0.42
0.86
0.20
4.25
0.68
-0.05
0.04
0.12
12.25
12.72
3.18
9.51
4.14
1.63
2.13
3.20
3.62
0.02
0.08
1.45
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.89
1.48
0.01
0.08
0.03
0.01
0.01
3.23
9.50
0.03
^
©
1
537
161
29
132
15
800
441
224
49
326
183
175
1580
415
570
2422
2267
1010
1136
137
1672
593
23
86
574
-6
42
11
90
29
-3
26
4
84
-80
9
15.04
14.91
14.75
14.40
14.89
11.97
14.54
15.06
15.01
14.94
6.24
5.92
12.70
8.21
12.05
13.78
13.41
12.71
12.41
15.03
14.93
13.99
14.98
15.04
15.02
14.41
13.99
15.05
14.99
15.02
15.04
15.04
12.72
8.23
15.01
F-13
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
95
95
95
95
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
103.122
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
109
109
109
109
109
Year
1998
1998
1998
1998
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
Make
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Cadillac
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Model
Quest
Quest
Quest
Quest
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
Camry
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
SLS
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
15JUL09:09:04:02
15JUL09:09:08:08
15JUL09:09:15:11
15JUL09:09:16:30
15JUL09:09:19:59
15JUL09:11:48:31
15JUL09:11:53:10
15JUL09:11:55:25
15JUL09:11:59:28
15JUL09: 12:05:12
15JUL09: 12:06:02
23 JUL09: 16:42:42
23 JUL09: 16:44:10
16JUL09:09:04:19
16JUL09: 10:28:21
16JUL09: 10:3 1:55
16JUL09: 10:35:11
16JUL09: 10:39:27
16JUL09: 10:46:39
16JUL09: 10:47:40
17JUL09: 13:23:25
17JUL09: 13:24:34
16JUL09: 11:18:48
16JUL09: 13:46:50
16JUL09: 13:53:19
16JUL09: 13:55:29
16JUL09:14:01:27
16JUL09: 14:08:23
16JUL09: 14:09:19
23 JUL09: 16:04:32
23JUL09:16:05:51
16JUL09: 12:30:46
20JUL09: 14:49:31
20JUL09: 14:54:17
20JUL09: 14:56:26
20JUL09: 15:00:36
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
56
37
13
13
11
48
34
49
34
12
13
14
11
14
53
34
51
33
8
11
14
14
10
37
37
53
56
13
12
14
11
14
54
36
51
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
41
11
10
8
12
4
11
11
12
8
6
11
7
16
5
18
14
16
0
6
14
14
11
17
22
10
22
10
11
11
11
19
13
16
20
23
Temperature (F)
70
77
72
72
72
78
77
78
79
86
86
101
101
78
83
87
84
89
88
88
94
94
89
89
89
86
86
97
97
104
104
94
92
90
92
90
oj
222
192
76
199
1175
212
353
210
645
1926
2432
281
927
144
133
206
144
230
218
111
160
269
1375
265
391
435
372
6713
2031
62
83
328
394
303
296
280
EI23 Bin
4
4
2
4
7
4
5
4
6
7
7
5
6
3
3
4
3
4
4
5
4
4
7
4
5
5
5
7
7
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
O
©
•3
287
495
226
157
516
581
820
810
875
833
1680
1024
2032
622
267
355
282
517
424
371
306
1123
3224
3276
2982
1791
3493
2753
59
33
163
195
131
169
222
O
s>
©
•3
315
435
60
58
-49
531
694
652
384
531
2035
18
-871
292
514
190
316
157
111
267
307
186
536
2885
3362
2236
2099
1942
1414
62
28
-58
-43
-70
-115
29
O
0
9
9.30
-0.03
0.00
0.06
4.74
111
1.52
4.77
2.10
3.48
4.57
3.54
3.18
3.31
0.17
5.62
0.29
0.22
0.25
0.22
0.20
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.33
4.36
0.09
0.02
0.17
0.06
0.03
0.14
0.02
0.08
0.02
^
©
1
119
959
2470
1701
826
71
521
427
645
598
578
465
508
811
2593
1261
1367
1432
1815
1901
1844
402
657
693
489
272
87
729
321
206
275
14
419
182
81
9
8.37
15.03
14.95
14.94
11.61
9.46
13.92
11.60
13.50
12.51
11.70
12.47
12.70
12.63
14.83
10.97
14.79
14.83
14.80
14.82
14.84
14.96
14.90
14.91
14.71
11.87
14.88
14.93
14.92
15.01
15.02
14.95
15.02
14.99
15.03
F-14
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
109
109
109
109
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
127
127
Year
1995
1995
1995
1995
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1993
1993
Make
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Jeep
Jeep
Model
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Camaro
Amigo
Amigo
Amigo
Amigo
Amigo
Amigo
Amigo
Cherokee
Cherokee
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
DateTime
20JUL09: 15:09:30
20JUL09: 15: 11:06
20JUL09: 15:50:19
20JUL09:15:51:14
16JUL09: 13:02:28
16JUL09: 16:05:03
16JUL09: 16:09:21
16JUL09: 16: 12:27
16JUL09: 16: 17:31
16JUL09: 16:24:24
16JUL09: 16:25:21
16JUL09: 13:38:56
16JUL09: 15:23:26
16JUL09: 15:26:33
16JUL09:15:31:22
16JUL09: 15:34:48
16JUL09:15:41:41
16JUL09: 15:42:30
07AUG09:12:05:17
07AUG09: 12:06:28
17JUL09: 10:21:37
17JUL09:11:33:15
17JUL09: 11:36:51
17JUL09: 11:38:55
17JUL09: 11:44:21
17JUL09: 11:50:44
17JUL09:11:53:01
17JUL09: 10:46:26
17JUL09: 12:19:17
17JUL09: 12:21:33
17JUL09: 12:25:41
17JUL09: 12:29:20
17JUL09: 12:37:12
17JUL09: 12:38:04
17JUL09: 15:5 1:25
17JUL09: 16:38:53
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
15
14
14
13
14
54
38
55
36
11
12
10
37
54
38
53
11
11
14
15
17
61
42
62
38
12
11
13
38
45
38
44
12
13
10
54
VSP (kW/Mg)
11
13
11
5
22
19
12
18
16
8
12
8
11
9
13
18
7
7
13
13
28
30
18
36
9
12
10
8
15
11
13
20
5
7
19
18
Temperature (F)
103
104
94
94
96
86
89
85
89
99
99
98
86
85
87
86
99
96
93
93
80
83
87
83
85
89
89
82
89
86
90
85
92
92
100
88
oj
147
276
80
87
114
218
287
282
243
86
95
1003
564
371
444
336
2091
626
119
204
161
245
241
186
286
298
177
604
340
185
366
284
101
81
456
279
EI23 Bin
3
5
2
2
3
4
5
5
4
2
3
6
6
5
5
5
7
6
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
3
2
6
5
O
©
•3
153
142
11
-1
17
69
287
6
-3
2328
1538
752
1739
1034
4672
2932
424
253
389
286
338
142
279
432
518
6781
377
14
243
308
47
24
1240
O
s>
©
•3
-136
-40
-1
-4
36
176
127
-35
194
-3
-8
750
700
313
809
796
2155
-1101
300
59
305
194
303
115
172
309
365
4390
83
-219
131
-94
-94
-5
-1152
264
O
0
9
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.28
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.06
0.72
0.04
6.14
0.00
0.19
6.86
3.48
3.12
1.24
0.74
0.34
1.36
1.04
0.96
0.23
0.33
0.03
0.11
0.09
0.15
0.13
4.15
^
©
1
36
43
49
261
7
-2
51
21
12
1530
1409
1417
2132
126
1479
1933
119
78
1033
1221
705
2538
36
889
1027
1034
824
2177
1662
2602
625
852
176
9
15.02
15.03
15.03
15.03
15.03
14.85
15.01
15.04
15.05
14.90
14.91
14.46
14.90
10.62
14.86
14.76
10.12
12.55
12.77
14.11
14.49
14.72
14.07
14.26
14.31
14.65
14.78
14.95
14.91
14.89
14.92
14.93
12.03
F-15
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
127
127
127
127
127
127
127
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
131
131
131
131
131
131
131
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
138
Year
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
Make
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Chrysler
Chrysler
Chrysler
Chrysler
Chrysler
Chrysler
Suzuki
Model
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Impala
Impala
Impala
Impala
Impala
Impala
Impala
Sebring
Sebring
Sebring
Sebring
Sebring
Sebring
Sebring
Vitara
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
17JUL09: 16:43:30
17JUL09: 16:46:24
17JUL09:16:51:19
17JUL09: 16:58:08
17JUL09: 16:59:03
24JUL09:08:59:42
24JUL09:09:00:45
20JUL09:09:44:43
20JUL09: 10:52:09
20JUL09: 10:57:59
20JUL09:11:00:11
20JUL09:11:04:16
20JUL09: 11:1 1:22
20JUL09:11:14:16
20JUL09: 10: 12:22
20JUL09: 12:0 1:01
20JUL09: 12:08:51
20JUL09: 12:13:04
20JUL09: 12:20:31
20JUL09: 12:27:05
20JUL09: 12:28:42
20JUL09: 11:04:40
20JUL09: 13:31:16
20JUL09: 13:35:28
20JUL09: 13:41:49
20JUL09: 13:43:53
20JUL09: 13:51:17
20JUL09: 13:52:26
20JUL09: 12:08:49
21JUL09:09:59:57
21 JUL09: 10:07:33
21JUL09:10:13:09
21 JUL09: 10:20:44
21JUL09: 10:28:18
21 JUL09: 10:29:32
20JUL09: 14:24:54
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
36
55
37
11
11
14
13
11
49
35
50
35
17
12
11
49
49
38
38
15
14
13
51
38
39
54
15
15
9
51
53
39
39
14
11
15
VSP (kW/Mg)
11
29
13
8
9
7
6
11
21
7
26
16
15
7
5
13
12
14
23
18
13
18
13
19
22
7
12
13
12
18
0
31
28
12
7
9
Temperature (F)
93
88
94
96
96
79
79
88
86
85
86
85
94
94
90
89
89
84
85
97
97
93
93
86
86
93
94
94
97
78
79
73
72
77
77
99
oj
615
381
232
852
310
63
90
57
137
197
176
375
38
45
49
162
157
188
162
49
68
42
128
260
226
174
64
75
105
162
197
251
326
52
82
66
EI23 Bin
6
5
4
6
5
2
2
1
3
4
4
5
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
1
2
1
3
4
4
4
2
2
3
4
4
4
5
1
2
2
O
©
•3
235
380
1032
3715
3146
177
101
30
23
132
120
207
10
-27
-5
448
206
2
6
-25
203
253
-14
-9
0
85
185
17
0
12
O
s>
©
•3
-153
209
693
606
-507
1
64
38
-27
45
135
-59
34
-40
-8
683
135
189
-162
-11
9
-49
-171
-54
128
9
-28
-3
_9
-82
-146
-36
-99
11
-2
23
O
0
9
0.04
0.08
0.06
0.09
0.02
0.25
0.76
0.49
0.40
-0.04
0.09
0.01
1.31
0.06
0.08
0.54
-0.09
0.12
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.11
0.04
^
©
1
935
484
152
119
205
211
104
118
158
-44
2633
265
47
258
36
810
1153
263
41
55
20
28
-5
21
250
49
188
-5
11
-41
9
14.99
14.97
14.98
14.87
14.94
14.86
14.50
14.70
14.76
15.08
14.89
15.03
14.11
15.01
14.99
14.63
15.07
14.96
14.98
15.01
15.05
15.03
15.02
15.02
15.01
15.03
15.02
15.04
14.97
15.03
F-16
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
138
138
138
138
138
138
139
139
139
139
139
139
139
156
156
156
156
156
156
156
157
157
157
157
157
157
157
157
157
157
158
158
158
158
158
158
Year
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
1982
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
Make
Suzuki
Suzuki
Suzuki
Suzuki
Suzuki
Suzuki
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Model
Vitara
Vitara
Vitara
Vitara
Vitara
Vitara
Sunfire
Sunfire
Sunfire
Sunfire
Sunfire
Sunfire
Sunfire
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
F150 Explorer
F150 Explorer
F150 Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
F150 Explorer
F150 Explorer
F150 Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
Cobalt
Cobalt
Cobalt
Cobalt
Cobalt
Cobalt
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
21JUL09:08:50:48
21JUL09:08:55:35
21JUL09:08:57:49
21JUL09:09:01:57
21 JUL09:09: 11:06
21 JUL09:09: 14:44
20JUL09: 14:25:01
20JUL09: 16:43:19
20JUL09: 16:46:29
20JUL09: 16:54:24
20JUL09: 16:59:21
20JUL09: 17:07:14
20JUL09: 17:08:12
22JUL09: 10:08:52
22JUL09: 11:1 1:57
22JUL09: 11:15:34
22JUL09: 11:18:07
22JUL09: 11:23:04
22JUL09: 11:30:41
22JUL09: 11:32:29
22JUL09: 10:45:54
22JUL09: 13:45:42
22JUL09: 13:50:29
22JUL09: 13:52:35
22JUL09: 14:0 1:23
22JUL09: 14:05:27
22JUL09: 14: 11:46
22JUL09:14:13:13
22JUL09: 15:24:39
22JUL09: 15:26:16
22JUL09: 10: 10:36
22JUL09: 12:29:20
22JUL09: 12:34:01
22JUL09: 12:38:04
22JUL09: 12:40:54
22JUL09: 12:48:39
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
50
37
52
34
14
13
15
39
51
52
39
14
13
15
52
36
54
37
13
13
14
53
40
53
54
41
13
14
13
14
8
38
54
39
53
14
VSP (kW/Mg)
16
22
22
13
11
11
18
21
7
14
19
11
11
16
13
17
19
20
11
12
17
-1
20
22
22
17
14
13
12
9
13
23
14
21
12
12
Temperature (F)
74
74
75
74
73
73
99
86
90
90
85
90
90
82
84
80
84
80
90
90
84
87
85
87
87
88
99
99
102
102
82
83
85
84
85
95
oj
175
164
128
255
70
45
56
223
142
138
239
66
56
54
214
360
299
587
91
136
515
250
358
247
238
276
366
169
123
128
95
364
254
311
249
56
EI23 Bin
4
4
3
4
2
1
1
4
3
3
4
2
1
1
4
5
5
6
3
3
6
4
5
4
4
5
5
4
3
3
3
5
4
5
4
1
O
©
•3
230
208
-22
-8
30
-35
34
-44
147
-50
-7
7
159
231
152
155
29
38
558
795
252
246
674
462
779
479
537
692
9
33
120
35
5
O
s>
©
•3
91
170
145
-238
-8
27
11
-143
-75
-79
-126
-9
-6
-9
-38
52
47
-19
_9
-29
190
203
9
327
381
259
264
248
374
535
22
-73
-53
-90
-491
9
O
0
9
0.05
0.28
-0.04
0.01
0.10
2.32
0.05
0.09
-0.02
0.00
0.05
0.09
0.19
0.05
0.37
-0.01
0.04
0.03
2.92
5.35
1.08
3.32
3.59
2.68
0.19
0.57
3.84
6.60
0.00
0.02
0.14
0.04
0.01
^
©
1
53
-36
51
48
-10
26
79
195
6
16
-2
-15
39
205
163
157
59
69
1117
596
2253
992
1404
1280
1883
1531
435
164
100
22
149
1
13
9
15.01
14.85
15.08
15.05
14.98
13.39
15.02
14.98
15.07
15.05
15.02
14.99
14.91
15.00
14.78
15.05
15.02
15.03
12.91
11.17
14.19
12.63
12.41
13.07
14.82
14.58
12.27
10.29
15.05
15.04
14.94
15.03
15.04
F-17
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
158
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
161
161
161
161
161
161
161
162.332
162.332
162.332
162.332
162.332
162.332
162.332
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
168
168
168
168
168
168
Year
2005
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
Make
Chevrolet
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Volvo
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Model
Cobalt
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
SC-1
SC-1
SC-1
SC-1
SC-1
SC-1
SC-1
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
S60
S60
S60
S60
S60
S60
S60
S60
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL2
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
22JUL09: 12:49:42
22JUL09:16:12:14
23 JUL09:09: 11:46
23JUL09:09:16:13
23JUL09:09:20:30
23JUL09:09:24:02
23JUL09:09:31:45
23JUL09:09:32:46
22JUL09: 16:28:37
23 JUL09: 10:37:44
23 JUL09: 10:40:16
23 JUL09: 10:44:19
23 JUL09: 10:46:26
23 JUL09: 10:54:07
23 JUL09: 10:55:27
11AUG09: 11:36:03
11AUG09:13:59:39
11AUG09:14:03:13
11AUG09: 14:06:50
11AUG09: 14:09:22
11AUG09: 14: 18:09
11AUG09: 14: 19:25
23JUL09:12:15:48
23 JUL09: 13:15:38
23 JUL09: 13:22:36
23 JUL09: 13:26:45
23 JUL09: 13:29:06
23 JUL09: 13:33:03
23 JUL09: 13:40:24
23 JUL09: 13:42:07
23 JUL09: 13:30:20
23 JUL09: 14:36:51
23 JUL09: 14:41:45
23 JUL09: 14:50:28
23 JUL09: 14:52:33
23 JUL09: 14:59:55
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
14
11
38
54
37
51
13
13
9
38
49
37
50
13
13
14
51
35
51
37
13
14
13
55
54
38
56
37
14
15
12
52
37
36
53
13
VSP (kW/Mg)
12
15
18
12
24
14
9
11
11
19
19
17
22
10
9
15
15
21
35
24
13
12
20
15
17
19
20
19
7
11
15
16
15
18
16
10
Temperature (F)
95
94
82
81
83
81
79
79
92
91
86
93
86
88
88
90
90
89
90
89
103
103
97
93
93
94
93
94
106
106
105
94
92
93
94
107
oj
57
1195
152
125
175
157
267
501
56
320
182
256
189
90
63
95
222
73
159
84
82
77
59
272
439
362
236
513
53
44
4061
140
168
310
210
1754
EI23 Bin
2
6
3
3
4
4
4
5
1
5
4
5
4
2
2
3
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
6
1
1
7
3
4
5
4
7
O
©
•3
1
3836
222
199
502
235
419
702
4
313
549
174
132
55
222
1
121
-37
49
220
74
391
88
144
281
42
14
14893
198
2613
O
s>
©
•3
1
5781
167
182
385
162
273
622
-159
78
-66
-377
117
111
111
-123
61
-4
51
-92
21
104
5
-1125
116
-24
-94
117
9
23
-736
78
406
82
-93
-76
O
0
9
0.01
1.44
0.05
0.23
0.11
0.56
0.24
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.26
0.04
1.26
0.05
2.88
0.08
0.22
0.74
0.04
0.25
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.12
0.07
0.41
0.04
0.19
^
v
I
5
171
96
377
138
1257
115
130
505
584
954
364
1577
609
101
304
201
657
510
243
37
-13
15
-18
63
1
-12
486
155
45
9
15.05
13.90
15.01
14.87
14.96
14.60
14.87
14.92
15.03
15.02
15.00
14.92
14.81
15.00
14.14
15.01
12.98
14.98
14.88
14.51
15.02
14.87
15.04
15.00
15.04
14.96
15.01
14.30
15.01
14.84
F-18
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
168
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
178
178
178
178
184
184
184
184
184
184
184
185
185
185
185
185
185
185
186
186
186
186
186
186
Year
1994
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
1969
1969
1969
1969
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
Make
Saturn
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
VW
vw
VW
vw
vw
vw
vw
vw
vw
vw
vw
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
SL2
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
CP-
Dunebuggy
CP-
Dunebuggy
CP-
Dunebuggy
CP-
Dunebuggy
Jetta
Jetta
Jetta
Jetta
Jetta
Jetta
Jetta
Echo
Echo
Echo
Echo
Echo
Echo
Echo
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
23JUL09:15:01:09
24JUL09: 13:00:15
24JUL09: 16:04:32
24JUL09: 16:08:50
24JUL09: 16: 12:39
24JUL09: 16: 16:41
24JUL09: 16:24:43
24JUL09: 16:25:52
24JUL09: 11:21:43
24JUL09: 12:59:11
24JUL09: 13: 11:29
24JUL09: 13:13:30
24JUL09: 15:24:17
27JUL09:09:18:01
27JUL09:09:25:09
27JUL09:09:27:41
27JUL09:09:31:11
27JUL09:09:40:24
27JUL09:09:41:51
27JUL09:09:00:02
27JUL09: 10:29:33
27JUL09: 10:32:23
27JUL09: 10:35:04
27JUL09: 10:39:44
27JUL09: 10:46:12
27JUL09: 10:47:42
27JUL09:09:30:58
27JUL09:11:35:23
27JUL09: 11:38:35
27JUL09:11:41:19
27JUL09: 11:44:47
27JUL09:11:53:44
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
12
18
50
36
53
37
14
15
14
14
14
12
53
33
54
34
12
12
13
55
37
54
35
12
11
8
55
36
54
36
12
VSP (kW/Mg)
8
24
14
14
16
16
5
11
17
13
11
16
28
32
27
25
12
12
15
20
20
17
20
13
13
6
26
17
22
19
7
Temperature (F)
107
98
95
105
95
108
102
102
93
93
100
100
102
79
71
79
71
78
78
73
84
76
85
75
85
85
77
85
80
85
79
91
oj
799
102
202
130
209
73
93
60
429
210
217
160
363
98
72
119
81
45
75
53
210
73
228
61
65
85
66
140
63
213
92
101
EI23 Bin
6
3
4
3
4
2
3
2
5
4
4
3
5
3
2
3
2
1
2
1
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
3
3
O
©
•3
1799
59
92
20
106
143
18
59
1168
972
1153
1676
253
14
44
13
2
28
12
5
320
50
-4
-12
7
80
61
26
154
6
49
O
s>
©
•3
144
-47
-63
-59
81
136
-24
21
234
789
687
687
88
-50
28
-109
-4
30
8
20
283
13
-14
_9
-26
36
9
72
38
110
-41
21
O
0
9
0.97
0.42
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.21
0.32
7.46
3.76
5.42
5.52
0.08
0.10
0.11
0.80
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.05
-0.13
0.02
0.00
0.09
0.08
0.11
1.37
0.08
2.19
0.38
0.11
^
©
1
118
36
-7
-42
45
30
-4
10
1562
2729
1349
1107
504
315
106
22
58
7
19
624
92
38
12
49
138
325
1801
1223
1387
543
541
9
14.30
14.75
15.03
15.04
15.04
15.04
14.91
14.82
9.62
12.23
11.09
11.01
14.97
14.97
14.97
14.48
15.04
15.01
15.03
15.00
15.13
15.04
15.06
14.99
14.99
14.96
14.01
14.95
13.43
14.76
14.95
F-19
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
186
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
189
189
189
189
189
189
189
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
192
192
192
192
192
192
192
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
Year
1995
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
Make
Ford
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Infmiti
Infmiti
Infmiti
Infmiti
Infmiti
Infmiti
Infmiti
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
F150
GX-470
GX-470
GX-470
GX-470
GX-470
GX-470
GX-470
Safari
Safari
Safari
Safari
Safari
Safari
Safari
Expedition
Expedition
Expedition
Expedition
Expedition
Expedition
Expedition
Q45
Q45
Q45
Q45
Q45
Q45
Q45
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
27JUL09:11:55:12
27JUL09:09:43:07
27JUL09: 12:42:32
27JUL09: 12:46:12
27JUL09: 12:50:10
27JUL09: 12:53:37
27JUL09: 13:02: 15
27JUL09: 13:03:37
27JUL09: 12:40:50
27JUL09: 14:24: 15
27JUL09: 14:27:26
27JUL09: 14:30:19
27JUL09: 14:33:37
27JUL09: 14:40:22
27JUL09: 14:42:07
27JUL09: 13:36:30
28JUL09: 10:03:10
28JUL09: 10:07:53
28JUL09: 10: 10:04
28JUL09:10:15:19
28JUL09: 10:22:42
28JUL09: 10:23:50
27JUL09: 11:07:32
28JUL09:08:21:25
28JUL09:08:29:44
28JUL09:08:36:49
28JUL09:08:45:17
28JUL09:08:52:18
28JUL09:08:53:47
27JUL09: 11:54:57
28JUL09:09:10:10
28JUL09:09:14:15
28JUL09:09: 16:29
28JUL09:09:20:32
28JUL09:09:27:47
28JUL09:09:28:58
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
11
19
55
34
54
33
12
12
15
54
34
54
35
11
10
12
53
34
55
34
12
12
17
36
36
55
55
13
13
13
54
35
53
37
14
13
VSP (kW/Mg)
8
29
21
21
23
18
13
11
15
17
17
18
16
8
6
11
17
15
19
15
8
10
19
22
19
38
33
8
9
16
32
22
31
19
14
14
Temperature (F)
91
78
86
81
86
82
93
93
92
86
83
87
84
95
95
95
73
62
72
62
67
67
87
65
66
66
65
69
69
91
75
65
75
64
72
70
oj
48
89
309
65
233
101
138
108
89
191
96
192
76
88
80
70
120
318
220
452
118
91
62
204
315
198
258
161
63
35
156
153
173
144
45
55
EI23 Bin
1
2
5
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
4
2
2
2
2
3
5
4
5
3
3
2
4
5
4
4
4
2
1
4
4
4
3
1
1
O
©
•3
262
1
150
-10
201
15
11
-5
238
210
76
294
120
74
292
9
17
137
114
74
13
4
24
120
82
201
149
39
32
5
96
79
12
-15
-1
-11
O
s>
©
•3
233
-22
-57
-40
-110
-73
-10
-38
215
-118
122
224
81
7
302
7
-14
-53
61
-59
-22
-3
23
92
11
213
68
32
38
5
62
62
-9
-50
6
-7
O
0
9
4.91
0.01
1.67
0.01
0.84
0.01
0.03
0.03
2.17
3.26
0.09
5.07
0.04
0.12
1.70
0.24
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.09
0.04
0.01
0.09
0.20
0.09
1.98
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.10
1.62
0.02
0.24
0.01
0.03
0.02
^
©
1
69
4
66
-4
-37
6
5
-6
406
2010
332
908
949
262
113
-15
47
26
95
133
-1
1
1089
178
41
467
1397
100
150
32
107
43
-36
5
30
67
9
11.52
15.05
13.85
15.05
14.45
15.05
15.03
15.03
13.47
12.64
14.97
11.38
14.99
14.96
13.82
14.89
15.01
15.04
15.03
14.98
15.02
15.04
14.95
14.90
14.99
13.61
14.92
14.99
14.99
14.98
13.88
15.03
14.88
15.04
15.03
15.04
F-20
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
197
197
197
197
197
197
197
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
203.205
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
213
213
213
213
213
213
Year
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1977
1979
1979
1979
1979
1979
1979
Make
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Model
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Econoline
Econoline
Econoline
Econoline
Econoline
Econoline
Econoline
D-150
D-150
D-150
D-150
D-150
D-150
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
27JUL09: 13:54:24
28JUL09: 10:57:23
28JUL09: 11:0 1:43
28JUL09: 11:07:55
28JUL09: 11:10:29
28JUL09: 11:24:06
28JUL09: 11:24:49
27JUL09: 15:24:34
28JUL09: 12:23:04
28JUL09: 12:27:49
28JUL09: 12:29:58
28JUL09: 12:34:06
28JUL09: 12:5 1:06
28JUL09: 12:52:05
28JUL09: 11:19:32
28JUL09: 14: 15:27
28JUL09:14:18:41
28JUL09: 14:22:58
28JUL09: 14:26:52
28JUL09: 14:42:44
28JUL09: 14:43:44
31JUL09:11:41:17
3 1JUL09: 11:42:31
28JUL09:15:18:32
28JUL09: 16:33:07
28JUL09: 16:37:05
28JUL09: 16:40:23
28JUL09: 16:45:10
28JUL09: 16:54:42
28JUL09: 16:56:00
28JUL09: 15:25:34
29JUL09:09: 17:36
29JUL09:09:21:15
29JUL09:09:24:57
29JUL09:09:29:49
29JUL09:09:38:05
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
14
47
32
34
53
14
13
12
52
34
54
37
13
13
12
31
52
33
52
11
10
9
11
14
48
32
48
35
12
13
11
49
33
48
33
10
VSP (kW/Mg)
18
23
18
19
27
13
15
11
23
18
29
22
13
12
9
16
30
17
13
7
9
6
6
15
19
11
17
17
7
8
9
19
12
13
16
7
Temperature (F)
94
71
64
63
71
68
68
89
71
64
71
64
72
72
68
72
75
72
75
72
72
88
88
73
76
71
75
71
72
72
72
65
66
66
67
70
oj
58
216
171
219
119
34
33
57
123
144
135
145
59
52
5863
850
247
517
190
347
285
168
114
1104
214
428
291
1046
168
254
1442
740
963
536
490
382
EI23 Bin
1
4
4
4
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
1
7
6
4
5
4
5
5
4
3
7
4
5
5
7
4
4
7
5
6
5
5
4
O
©
•3
323
39
234
58
170
53
373
1
63
39
55
91
1
10
4766
1652
918
838
921
390
460
226
51
1308
907
1148
873
663
924
1106
8544
7526
4316
8695
6308
7108
O
s>
©
•3
290
-122
243
17
58
100
396
3
69
-30
-32
-41
_9
12
2190
1031
462
381
663
236
205
172
55
264
665
853
580
18
578
759
4998
5788
3626
3896
5502
6092
O
0
9
2.29
1.24
0.07
0.06
3.10
0.16
1.92
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
-0.01
0.01
0.06
0.05
0.07
0.15
0.09
0.08
0.14
0.14
0.97
0.27
3.53
3.99
2.79
4.71
2.46
2.36
2.36
3.78
4.30
1.78
3.92
2.29
4.86
^
©
1
363
566
1019
551
810
291
339
3
112
-59
-25
-2
21
-15
91
104
407
34
674
43
58
57
48
505
821
1111
538
460
924
939
1309
1160
1226
1302
1313
1595
9
13.39
14.15
14.96
14.99
12.80
14.93
13.66
15.01
15.03
15.04
15.04
15.06
15.05
15.01
14.87
14.95
14.90
14.96
14.94
14.94
14.94
14.35
14.86
12.47
12.14
12.98
11.63
13.25
13.30
13.29
12.04
11.70
13.60
11.94
13.17
11.30
F-21
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
213
214
214
214
214
214
214
214
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
218
218
218
218
218
218
218
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
220
220
220
220
220
220
220
Year
1979
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
Make
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
VW
vw
VW
vw
vw
vw
vw
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Model
D-150
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Ranger
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
Cabriolet
LS400
LS400
LS400
LS400
LS400
LS400
LS400
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
29JUL09:09:39:15
28JUL09: 16:07:32
29JUL09: 10:58:56
29JUL09: 11:03:26
29JUL09:11:06:17
29JUL09: 11:09:51
29JUL09: 11:16:23
29JUL09: 11:17:22
28JUL09: 17:00:31
29 JUL09: 13:25:59
29JUL09: 13:28:53
29 JUL09: 13:33:30
29JUL09: 13:36:09
29 JUL09: 13:43:32
29 JUL09: 13:44:34
29JUL09:08:45:39
29JUL09: 10:20:26
29JUL09: 10:24:45
29JUL09: 10:27:40
29JUL09: 10:32:13
29JUL09: 10:39:23
29JUL09: 10:40:32
29JUL09: 10:23:03
29JUL09: 14: 16:56
29 JUL09: 14:25:40
29JUL09: 14:28:48
29 JUL09: 14:33:27
29JUL09: 14:41:23
29 JUL09: 14:43:15
29JUL09: 11:40:57
29JUL09:15:19:20
29JUL09: 15:24:33
29JUL09: 15:32:26
29JUL09: 15:36:08
29JUL09: 15:43:45
29JUL09: 15:44:54
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
11
14
54
37
54
36
12
12
15
33
52
33
53
13
14
13
53
34
52
34
14
12
15
56
34
55
37
13
12
13
53
36
33
52
12
14
VSP (kW/Mg)
8
15
17
20
24
18
10
8
19
20
24
22
6
16
21
16
15
20
19
17
15
11
18
19
19
19
21
12
15
12
22
22
20
19
13
16
Temperature (F)
70
74
73
68
73
66
74
74
72
66
71
67
71
72
72
63
70
72
72
72
76
76
75
71
69
71
69
73
73
71
73
72
71
74
75
75
oj
422
560
153
72
106
50
88
144
356
56
119
77
120
192
755
50
149
80
221
59
68
64
96
150
89
231
75
72
91
173
153
42
85
154
47
79
EI23 Bin
4
6
4
2
3
1
2
3
5
1
3
2
3
4
6
1
4
2
4
2
2
2
3
3
2
4
2
2
3
4
4
1
2
4
1
2
O
©
•3
6361
198
114
23
62
23
62
65
432
97
110
71
268
141
404
68
10
53
146
152
7
49
21
-18
4
5
12
59
109
18
9
123
-5
15
O
s>
©
•3
6236
-397
100
52
65
8
46
18
373
80
77
49
220
168
309
64
-200
1
128
118
-55
6
4
16
-2
-129
12
14
12
-8
81
3
23
87
-12
28
O
0
9
2.96
-0.07
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.18
0.54
0.08
0.75
4.52
0.27
0.15
0.27
0.43
0.20
0.25
0.12
0.06
0.09
0.46
0.12
0.07
0.04
0.09
0.05
3.51
0.01
0.03
0.27
0.02
0.01
^
©
1
1449
-69
43
49
162
553
-16
-4
2093
516
4111
13
178
689
755
321
844
202
338
56
686
888
40
1522
194
263
386
48
31
305
615
36
45
96
9
12.69
15.10
15.04
15.03
15.02
15.02
15.02
15.03
14.83
14.65
14.84
14.52
11.80
14.83
14.91
14.84
14.71
14.90
14.86
14.96
14.98
14.96
14.72
14.92
14.99
15.01
14.98
15.01
12.53
15.03
15.01
14.86
15.04
15.05
F-22
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
221
221
221
221
221
221
221
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
238
238
238
238
238
238
238
246
246
246
246
246
246
246
249
249
249
249
249
249
249
252
Year
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2002
Make
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
Toyota
Model
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Explorer
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
328i
328i
328i
328i
328i
328i
328i
Tacoma
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
29JUL09: 10:37:10
29JUL09: 11:56:03
29JUL09: 11:59:45
29 JUL09: 12:03:39
29JUL09: 12:07:17
29JUL09: 12:16:12
29JUL09: 12:17:19
30JUL09: 11:54:57
30JUL09: 13:17:31
30JUL09: 13:20:19
30JUL09: 13:23:32
30JUL09: 13:26:36
30JUL09: 13:32:56
30JUL09: 13:34:12
30JUL09: 15:45:28
30JUL09: 16:53:08
30JUL09: 16:57:48
30JUL09: 17:0 1:06
30JUL09: 17:05:02
30JUL09: 17: 11:35
30JUL09: 17: 12:44
31JUL09:08:58:44
3 1JUL09: 10:02:52
31JUL09:10:10:20
31JUL09:10:33:52
3 1JUL09: 10:41:25
3 1JUL09: 10:47:23
3 1JUL09: 10:48:36
3 1JUL09: 11:55:24
3 1JUL09: 12:56:04
31JUL09: 13:00:02
31JUL09: 13:03:31
31JUL09: 13:06:54
31JUL09: 13:13:59
31JUL09: 13:15:04
3 1JUL09: 14:58:55
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
15
52
34
55
36
13
11
14
55
35
54
35
14
12
13
36
53
37
54
11
12
16
36
35
57
58
12
12
14
53
32
53
34
12
12
16
VSP (kW/Mg)
20
17
16
24
17
10
8
14
19
17
19
24
10
10
9
18
25
21
22
6
9
16
16
17
24
24
10
10
17
20
20
24
22
12
11
19
Temperature (F)
76
73
65
73
65
71
71
58
63
55
63
55
61
61
72
66
67
67
67
72
72
71
85
85
88
88
83
85
87
82
86
82
90
86
86
74
oj
61
91
60
133
50
100
93
118
104
399
141
367
113
181
378
368
310
268
226
130
158
46
278
349
186
291
67
124
51
142
458
202
520
116
82
39
EI23 Bin
2
2
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
5
3
5
3
4
5
5
5
5
4
3
4
1
5
5
4
5
2
3
1
3
5
4
6
3
2
1
O
©
•3
193
287
79
328
-3
203
4
53
126
249
110
241
71
116
758
299
272
188
301
99
94
7
166
296
144
395
33
18
105
78
262
144
170
24
16
-59
O
s>
©
•3
129
291
64
234
-36
208
-79
-95
171
-63
117
153
12
-6
522
-324
135
-99
482
24
43
-68
27
238
21
130
-29
-32
106
-8
82
59
58
1
33
-37
O
0
9
2.59
5.00
0.15
4.21
0.17
1.46
0.08
0.04
1.61
0.07
1.49
1.77
0.06
0.11
0.10
0.24
1.03
0.06
0.34
0.08
0.18
0.14
0.05
0.14
0.17
0.56
0.19
0.30
0.43
0.07
-0.01
0.03
0.01
0.12
0.21
0.10
^
©
1
303
377
356
344
-78
136
235
2316
222
1975
109
19
190
2330
123
177
1188
181
893
95
147
307
5
9
395
216
58
56
501
333
236
1225
138
32
38
71
9
13.18
11.45
14.93
12.02
14.93
14.00
14.99
14.94
13.89
14.93
13.98
13.78
15.00
14.89
14.96
14.87
14.26
15.00
14.77
14.99
14.92
14.94
15.01
14.94
14.92
14.63
14.91
14.84
14.73
14.99
15.04
14.98
15.03
14.97
14.90
14.98
F-23
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
252
252
252
252
252
252
255
255
255
255
255
255
255
261
261
261
261
261
261
261
261
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
263
263
263
263
263
263
263
266
Year
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2002
Make
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Chevrolet
Model
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
Tacoma
RX330
RX330
RX330
RX330
RX330
RX330
RX330
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
Suburban
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Tahoe
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
31JUL09:16:05:09
31JUL09:16:09:01
31JUL09:16:13:05
31JUL09:16:17:12
31JUL09:16:23:54
3 1JUL09: 16:24:59
31JUL09:15:36:01
3 1JUL09: 16:49:56
31JUL09:16:53:13
3 1JUL09: 16:57:52
3 1JUL09: 17:01:05
3 1JUL09: 17:08:34
3 1JUL09: 17:09:32
03AUG09:09:33:22
03AUG09:12:31:18
03AUG09:12:37:10
03 AUG09: 12:39:44
03AUG09:12:43:23
03AUG09:12:45:57
03AUG09:12:53:14
03 AUG09: 12:54:26
03AUG09:09:49:36
03AUG09:13:45:16
03AUG09:13:48:26
03AUG09:13:53:15
03AUG09:13:56:00
03AUG09:14:03:02
03 AUG09: 14:04:40
03AUG09:10:02:01
03AUG09:11:15:05
03 AUG09: 11:22:09
03AUG09:11:25:54
03 AUG09: 11:29:38
03AUG09: 11:43: 18
03 AUG09: 11:44:32
03 AUG09:1 1:16:59
Remote Sensing
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Vleasu
Speed (mph)
34
54
36
53
11
10
15
52
35
54
35
12
12
10
50
52
35
55
38
12
15
10
45
40
45
36
11
12
14
52
35
51
37
14
13
13
remen
VSP (kW/Mg)
18
18
21
17
9
9
24
9
20
22
19
13
13
5
4
5
20
14
21
12
11
10
22
23
26
21
9
8
18
6
24
20
25
15
15
17
t(RSIV
Temperature (F)
78
78
79
78
79
79
75
79
76
79
74
78
78
81
92
93
91
93
91
95
95
83
92
93
92
94
98
98
85
99
92
99
92
95
95
93
1)
oj
169
147
213
121
142
136
89
123
263
107
188
116
180
97
85
181
126
190
103
174
126
104
184
70
208
81
55
220
76
200
98
209
81
39
49
91
EI23 Bin
4
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
2
4
3
4
3
4
3
3
4
2
4
2
1
4
2
4
3
4
2
1
1
2
O
©
•3
94
67
73
72
52
29
10
37
50
-87
78
21
25
14
277
198
204
259
331
121
235
206
394
228
377
555
538
22
30
-3
22
-23
49
O
s>
©
•3
10
58
-59
-194
-12
-53
1
11
-35
-169
54
-9
-34
0
-118
197
185
31
190
246
37
553
104
298
123
243
-21
-164
9
-274
34
-22
-12
-7
-21
51
O
0
9
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.03
1.84
0.08
0.00
0.02
-0.02
0.00
0.01
0.15
3.77
5.95
3.86
6.09
5.36
0.66
0.51
3.50
2.55
4.25
2.00
0.33
0.75
0.08
0.19
0.02
0.12
0.13
1.05
^
©
1
32
-7
-44
150
37
59
-10
49
9
-8
10
15
-10
9
762
69
1083
90
145
25
1124
1486
2093
1420
1899
593
373
55
21
1464
54
113
65
9
15.02
15.05
15.04
15.02
15.01
15.03
13.74
14.99
15.05
15.04
15.07
15.05
15.05
14.94
12.32
10.78
12.24
10.68
11.19
14.58
14.64
12.48
13.14
11.95
13.54
14.78
14.48
15.00
14.92
14.99
14.96
14.96
14.30
F-24
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
266
266
266
266
266
266
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
278
278
278
278
278
278
278
285
285
285
285
285
285
285
290
290
290
290
290
290
290
294
294
Year
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1985
1985
Make
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Ford
Ford
Model
Tahoe
Tahoe
Tahoe
Tahoe
Tahoe
Tahoe
Sierra
Sierra
Sierra
Sierra
Sierra
Sierra
Sierra
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
CRV
CRV
CRV
CRV
CRV
CRV
CRV
TSX
TSX
TSX
TSX
TSX
TSX
TSX
F150
F150
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Location
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
12AUG09:09:48:43
12AUG09:09:54:53
12AUG09: 10:01:05
12AUG09: 10:07:04
12AUG09:10:15:56
12AUG09: 10: 17:03
03AUG09:13:20:57
04AUG09:08:37:18
04AUG09:08:40:47
04AUG09:08:44:48
04AUG09:08:47:37
04AUG09:08:54:36
04AUG09:08:55:37
03AUG09:15:20:38
04AUG09: 11:06:05
04AUG09: 11:09:01
04AUG09:! 1:12:26
04AUG09:! 1:16:36
04AUG09: 11:24:29
04AUG09: 11:25:26
04AUG09:14:25:13
04AUG09: 15:32:32
04AUG09:15:36:49
04AUG09: 15:41:04
04AUG09: 15:45:00
04AUG09:15:53:07
04AUG09:15:54:18
05AUG09:10:52:01
05AUG09:12:11:16
05AUG09: 12: 18:34
05AUG09: 12:47:31
05AUG09:12:53:43
05AUG09:13:00:38
05AUG09:13:01:41
05AUG09:13:36:24
05AUG09:14:55:11
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
37
37
58
58
14
16
12
53
38
53
38
13
14
16
54
39
54
36
13
13
12
49
39
52
36
14
16
13
39
39
49
56
15
15
15
13
VSP (kW/Mg)
22
22
28
37
16
17
12
19
33
5
27
10
11
19
9
23
21
20
9
12
11
21
18
20
19
13
11
13
25
25
32
40
14
9
17
9
Temperature (F)
86
87
89
89
82
82
95
85
77
87
77
72
73
90
95
87
95
89
86
86
102
93
93
94
92
97
97
83
86
86
90
90
93
93
91
101
oj
212
208
271
181
93
77
200
103
335
143
337
98
109
105
182
232
412
310
94
71
64
92
187
160
223
67
77
70
343
346
243
177
95
91
354
56
EI23 Bin
4
4
5
4
3
2
4
3
5
3
5
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
3
2
2
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
5
5
4
4
3
3
5
1
O
©
•3
71
136
260
177
11
15
88
94
195
66
161
57
51
40
301
145
205
357
17
35
3
10
5
156
151
-2
-18
-3
96
191
166
133
2
0
827
509
O
s>
©
•3
-23
-159
-48
161
-7
9
14
112
150
-25
55
-13
-14
15
216
-153
-157
-464
84
-26
-17
-79
-79
7
29
-6
-28
_2
-4
81
111
71
4
3
372
513
O
0
9
0.03
0.06
0.18
0.12
0.04
0.11
0.09
0.12
0.10
0.32
0.05
0.07
0.06
3.90
-0.06
0.05
1.04
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.26
0.51
0.07
0.64
0.05
0.21
0.81
0.01
0.05
0.07
0.02
0.10
0.05
0.02
2.62
4.80
^
©
1
146
248
259
758
543
111
153
535
546
278
691
243
308
9
60
-21
252
6
48
98
230
186
90
396
183
56
36
4
10
4
-20
-22
3
-8
961
661
9
15.03
14.99
14.91
14.93
15.01
14.97
14.98
14.95
14.96
14.81
14.99
14.99
14.99
12.25
15.08
15.01
14.29
15.03
15.03
15.02
14.86
14.68
15.00
14.58
15.01
14.90
14.47
15.05
15.01
15.00
15.03
14.98
15.02
15.04
13.12
11.58
F-25
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
294
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
295
301
301
301
302
302
302
302
302
302
302
302
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
306
306
306
309
309
309
309
309
309
Year
1985
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1981
1981
1981
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1967
1967
1967
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Make
Ford
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
GMC
GMC
GMC
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Model
F150
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
Sierra Kl 500
Sierra Kl 500
Sierra Kl 500
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Pickup
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Ram 1500
Chevelle
Chevelle
Chevelle
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
05AUG09:14:56:15
05AUG09: 14:30:21
05AUG09:16:03:30
05AUG09: 16:06:54
05AUG09: 16: 10:35
05AUG09: 16: 14:56
05AUG09: 16: 18:45
05AUG09: 16:26:43
05AUG09: 16:27:55
06AUG09:13:13:14
07AUG09:09:07:42
07AUG09:09:08:45
06AUG09:13:15:36
06AUG09:15:10:38
06AUG09:15:18:42
06AUG09:15:26:40
06AUG09:15:30:45
06AUG09: 15:34:33
06AUG09: 15:43: 15
06AUG09: 15:45:00
07AUG09:08:26:49
07AUG09: 10:37:32
07AUG09: 10:40:27
07AUG09:10:43:38
07AUG09: 10:46:42
07AUG09: 10:54: 19
07AUG09:10:55:42
06AUG09:15:18:00
06AUG09:16:31:15
06AUG09: 16:32: 10
07AUG09:13:11:58
07AUG09: 14:37:23
07AUG09: 14:40:33
07AUG09:14:43:43
07AUG09: 14:46:47
07AUG09: 14:54:53
Remote Sensing
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
VIeasu
Speed (mph)
14
11
54
38
56
38
54
15
13
13
12
12
13
40
36
42
49
52
15
14
13
36
53
36
54
14
15
14
14
17
8
37
50
36
16
remen
VSP (kW/Mg)
11
10
18
19
32
19
31
14
13
11
10
10
15
22
22
17
11
31
19
17
13
19
27
22
18
9
13
11
13
13
9
20
16
20
16
t(RSIV
Temperature (F)
101
95
88
89
88
89
88
110
110
93
77
77
93
80
79
79
80
77
79
79
72
90
83
90
83
85
86
84
74
74
98
98
89
97
89
110
1)
oj
63
80
163
286
191
395
192
70
61
440
150
95
125
285
336
191
120
439
118
95
61
420
174
291
151
72
101
189
368
152
506
231
158
461
159
506
EI23 Bin
2
2
4
5
4
5
4
2
2
5
3
2
3
5
5
4
3
5
3
3
2
5
4
5
3
2
3
4
5
3
5
4
4
5
3
5
O
©
•3
555
364
373
184
334
302
446
-27
-10
1103
1612
246
298
170
268
275
200
184
193
-62
530
85
371
80
3
65
1176
1473
1303
1399
266
517
859
O
s>
©
•3
493
308
489
-261
83
172
340
-3
16
-253
808
762
234
24
93
132
278
84
182
207
-246
-961
72
-109
147
-8
100
764
1313
1156
865
213
320
280
652
302
O
0
9
3.79
5.97
4.35
0.35
4.61
0.13
1.95
0.03
0.02
9.46
8.19
2.80
0.35
0.27
3.19
6.15
3.77
3.24
4.41
0.40
0.08
0.76
0.07
1.61
0.00
0.34
8.40
7.64
8.19
-0.01
0.06
0.02
0.12
^
©
1
1064
344
1523
163
1203
191
1398
78
1192
336
138
938
1456
1908
676
213
549
817
693
2103
3879
1919
3580
1989
2910
2335
292
614
693
2098
3654
1015
4098
9
12.28
10.75
11.87
14.79
11.69
14.94
13.59
15.03
15.00
8.22
9.13
13.01
14.74
14.79
12.73
10.63
12.32
12.69
11.86
14.69
14.84
14.44
14.86
13.83
14.95
14.73
8.99
9.51
9.12
14.94
14.87
14.99
14.79
F-26
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
309
311
311
311
311
311
311
311
316
316
316
316
316
316
316
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
325
325
325
325
325
Year
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Make
Nissan
VW
vw
VW
vw
vw
vw
vw
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Model
Sentra
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Passat
Accent
Accent
Accent
Accent
Accent
Accent
Accent
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
07AUG09:14:55:48
07AUG09: 14:36:53
07AUG09:15:48:38
07AUG09:15:52:48
07AUG09:15:56:51
07AUG09: 16:00:47
07AUG09: 16:09:26
07AUG09:16:10:17
07AUG09: 16: 14:44
10AUG09:09: 10:57
10AUG09:09: 14:04
10AUG09:09:20:22
10AUG09:09:23:13
10AUG09:09:33:02
10AUG09:09:34:15
10AUG09:09:38:42
10AUG09: 10:34:41
10AUG09: 10:40:37
10AUG09:10:43:11
10AUG09: 10:50:36
10AUG09: 10:58:31
10AUG09: 10:59:51
10AUG09:10:13:27
10AUG09: 12: 11:51
10AUG09: 12: 18:09
10AUG09: 12:29: 16
10AUG09:12:31:42
10AUG09: 12:41:00
10AUG09: 12:42:00
17AUG09: 10:54:47
17AUG09:10:55:38
10AUG09:15:35:52
11AUG09:09: 19:22
11AUG09:09:21:52
11AUG09:09:25:29
11AUG09:09:29:12
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
13
7
54
36
53
35
15
14
12
32
53
54
36
10
9
12
53
52
33
36
14
13
9
34
33
53
55
15
15
13
12
12
50
34
52
35
VSP (kW/Mg)
13
8
22
19
18
18
17
10
14
33
26
10
26
7
3
18
10
19
22
22
14
10
11
25
23
3
34
15
15
11
9
15
23
25
11
22
Temperature (F)
110
110
90
93
90
95
110
110
110
70
73
74
70
71
71
71
77
78
73
73
76
76
73
78
79
83
80
86
88
71
71
100
75
73
76
74
oj
251
160
152
349
217
244
107
110
1164
55
115
123
87
167
802
53
164
223
119
87
107
70
1839
232
459
416
114
785
1151
78
93
75
108
60
139
57
EI23 Bin
4
4
3
5
4
4
3
3
7
1
3
3
2
4
5
1
4
4
3
2
3
2
7
4
5
5
3
6
7
2
3
2
3
2
3
1
O
©
•3
388
7
185
201
140
1
18
1846
203
41
244
16
354
-15
-34
16
-1
3733
1692
1298
1445
2266
1671
200
202
-12
37
12
O
s>
©
•3
219
-34
174
81
-81
12
-12
37
-2780
125
702
593
-24
-772
-8466
16
123
141
-32
-55
-47
12
-1367
1360
653
3877
1197
1175
1802
113
66
-14
-108
-10
-162
3
O
0
9
0.09
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.17
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.44
2.22
0.07
0.07
0.03
0.06
0.02
0.45
0.36
0.32
5.92
0.41
0.45
0.64
0.35
0.02
0.02
0.01
^
©
1
3307
29
-10
26
57
-4
9
2429
151
18
306
-19
147
-24
7
7
-32
1989
1403
958
671
1187
975
1540
465
1674
2290
101
9
14.86
15.03
15.04
15.04
15.02
14.93
15.01
14.87
15.00
15.02
14.72
13.46
14.99
15.00
15.04
15.01
15.04
14.55
14.69
14.75
10.74
14.65
14.64
14.54
14.78
14.98
14.95
15.04
F-27
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
325
325
327
327
327
327
327
327
327
329
329
329
329
329
329
329
331
331
331
331
331
331
331
337
337
337
337
337
337
337
339
339
339
339
339
339
Year
2000
2000
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1981
1969
1969
1969
1969
1969
1969
1969
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
Make
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Model
Prizm
Prizm
320i
320i
320i
320i
320i
320i
320i
Commando
Commando
Commando
Commando
Commando
Commando
Commando
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Blazer
Xterra
Xterra
Xterra
Xterra
Xterra
Xterra
Xterra
4Runner
4Runner
4Runner
4Runner
4Runner
4Runner
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
11AUG09:09:37:20
11AUG09:09:38:17
10AUG09: 14:49:37
10AUG09:17:05:19
10AUG09: 17:08: 16
10AUG09:17:13:17
10AUG09:17:16:10
10AUG09:17:25:35
10AUG09: 17:26:47
11AUG09:09:42:19
11AUG09: 10:38:23
11AUG09: 10:41:47
11AUG09:10:45:23
11AUG09: 10:47:58
11AUG09:10:55:53
11AUG09: 10:56:56
11AUG09: 11:01:46
11AUG09: 12: 19:43
11AUG09:12:23:06
11AUG09: 12:28:09
11AUG09: 12:30:53
11AUG09: 12:39:23
11AUG09: 12:40:36
11AUG09:15:12:11
11AUG09:16:53:47
11AUG09: 16:56:05
11AUG09: 17:00:55
11AUG09: 17:04:34
11AUG09: 17: 12:59
11AUG09: 17: 14:03
11AUG09:15:59:53
12AUG09: 11:22: 17
12AUG09: 11:24:56
12AUG09: 11:27:53
12AUG09:11:35:56
12AUG09: 11:44:06
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
13
14
9
47
35
48
33
10
11
12
49
41
53
40
13
15
12
51
34
48
30
13
13
17
53
39
53
38
14
14
15
51
35
50
35
14
VSP (kW/Mg)
16
15
9
13
17
20
16
6
7
16
22
25
28
10
17
18
7
16
18
20
20
13
11
25
33
26
19
32
12
12
18
14
18
23
17
12
Temperature (F)
75
75
89
86
90
85
87
94
94
75
82
81
83
82
84
84
84
88
87
oo
OO
88
93
93
110
89
105
89
105
118
118
113
94
97
94
94
93
oj
84
66
1253
126
72
134
90
208
234
801
220
57
271
164
1987
1708
118
232
104
253
108
753
817
79
168
66
167
72
53
63
124
139
250
181
172
56
EI23 Bin
2
2
7
3
2
3
2
4
4
6
4
1
4
4
7
7
3
4
3
4
3
6
6
2
4
2
4
2
1
2
3
3
4
4
4
1
O
©
•3
10
2
235
445
136
571
755
1358
849
519
769
1287
1530
1709
658
149
38
230
325
1206
1443
12
100
3
100
23
4
-4
330
188
244
183
106
81
O
s>
©
•3
21
4
3332
663
194
415
99
326
16
-648
673
457
464
458
623
373
329
-155
90
393
260
1067
967
-3
94
93
-127
51
-12
-6
246
111
-134
114
35
25
O
0
9
0.11
0.03
2.06
2.23
1.28
0.33
0.37
5.77
4.31
4.18
6.29
7.28
5.20
4.48
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.04
0.03
1.05
4.96
0.10
0.39
3.14
0.14
0.23
3.06
2.33
0.04
4.28
0.03
0.37
^
©
1
155
160
281
690
479
1115
1241
741
894
802
478
540
592
744
26
330
1355
516
604
82
269
7
371
-46
120
33
136
11
270
93
773
572
1126
79
9
14.97
15.02
13.56
13.42
14.11
14.76
14.72
10.85
11.91
12.01
10.51
9.78
11.26
11.76
15.01
14.99
14.97
14.99
14.97
14.98
14.98
14.30
11.48
14.98
14.77
12.80
14.95
14.89
12.84
13.37
14.99
11.96
14.99
14.78
F-28
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
339
343
343
343
343
343
343
343
348.432
348.432
348.432
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
352
352
352
352
352
352
352
354
354
354
354
354
354
354
354
354
355
355
Year
1994
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1990
1990
1990
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1993
1993
Make
Toyota
VW
vw
VW
vw
vw
vw
vw
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Toyota
Toyota
Model
4Runner
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Ram Charger
Ram Charger
Ram Charger
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Corolla
Corolla
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
DateTime
12AUG09: 11:44:58
12AUG09: 10: 19:47
12AUG09:13:01:09
12AUG09:13:04:48
12AUG09:13:07:28
12AUG09:13:10:47
12AUG09:13:19:22
12AUG09:13:20:05
12AUG09:12:33:26
12AUG09: 14:40:04
12AUG09: 14:40:55
12AUG09: 14:52:02
12AUG09:15:52:51
12AUG09:15:56:50
12AUG09: 16:00:47
12AUG09: 16:04:37
12AUG09: 16: 11:52
12AUG09: 16: 14:05
12AUG09:16:04:18
13AUG09:09: 18:26
13AUG09:09:25:22
13AUG09:09:29:13
13AUG09:09:31:51
13AUG09:09:41:11
13AUG09:09:42:42
13AUG09:09:46:59
13AUG09: 12:50:42
13AUG09:13:00:36
13AUG09:13:07:57
13AUG09:13:14:17
13AUG09:13:21:57
13AUG09:13:23:01
21 AUG09: 12:42:39
21 AUG09: 12:44:02
13AUG09: 10:00: 16
13AUG09:! 1:11:59
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
14
10
36
49
35
50
16
13
12
12
12
13
36
53
36
54
14
13
11
51
35
51
37
15
12
10
40
39
59
56
13
13
13
12
10
52
VSP (kW/Mg)
15
11
21
6
22
9
20
16
8
8
9
17
22
24
19
19
14
14
12
6
29
8
22
13
10
7
20
20
47
41
11
12
9
9
6
26
Temperature (F)
93
83
95
93
97
93
104
104
97
101
101
104
98
93
98
93
115
115
115
80
78
80
79
81
81
81
91
87
86
86
91
91
83
83
82
86
oj
109
609
265
136
187
159
582
962
308
115
166
54
251
180
294
232
51
79
103
100
168
129
139
197
109
1153
162
116
208
714
9350
575
95
75
418
136
EI23 Bin
3
6
5
3
4
3
6
6
5
3
4
1
4
4
5
4
1
2
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
7
4
3
4
6
7
6
3
2
5
3
O
©
•3
18
600
61
139
888
720
382
470
408
-7
177
137
130
353
54
-9
65
241
51
313
50
67
65
2835
471
438
1430
1468
11162
2754
389
323
2816
340
O
s>
©
•3
-28
441
-31
335
17
111
562
594
292
406
334
-29
204
68
35
306
-51
-59
-210
93
-76
344
69
88
28
1110
381
239
469
199
9613
1066
306
176
1424
269
O
0
9
0.05
0.07
0.12
0.17
0.18
0.18
0.72
1.39
0.79
0.02
0.00
0.47
0.01
0.08
0.15
0.10
0.05
5.10
0.10
7.41
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.63
0.43
0.36
6.36
4.85
0.30
0.53
0.53
0.44
0.24
0.16
^
v
I
1853
341
646
363
841
384
1300
1240
1702
16
-18
-37
-25
61
23
-3
3421
419
356
148
-19
2062
575
1797
2185
2156
453
497
2309
2424
2048
2095
1102
2048
9
14.95
14.98
14.95
14.92
14.86
14.89
14.48
14.00
14.41
15.04
15.05
14.71
15.04
14.98
14.94
14.98
14.89
11.38
14.97
9.73
14.98
14.90
14.96
14.45
14.65
14.70
10.43
11.52
14.42
14.50
14.59
14.65
14.76
14.86
F-29
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
355
355
355
355
355
357
357
357
357
357
357
357
361
361
361
361
361
361
361
362
362
362
362
362
362
362
364
364
364
364
364
364
364
365
365
365
Year
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
2002
2002
2002
Make
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
VW
VW
VW
VW
VW
VW
VW
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Audi
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
Golf
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
TT Quatro
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Roadmaster
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
13AUG09:! 1:14:24
13AUG09:! 1:17:51
13AUG09:11:25:56
13AUG09:11:33:43
13AUG09:11:35:17
13AUG09: 12: 10:31
21AUG09:15:28:12
21AUG09:15:33:32
21AUG09:15:36:18
21AUG09:15:41:41
21AUG09:15:49:31
21AUG09:15:50:44
13AUG09: 16: 18:48
14AUG09: 10:07:20
14AUG09: 10: 10:36
14AUG09: 10: 14:47
14AUG09: 10: 17:52
14AUG09:10:25:19
14AUG09: 10:26:31
14AUG09:09:56:04
14AUG09: 11:38:26
14AUG09: 11:41: 14
14AUG09: 11:44:08
14AUG09: 11:48:34
14AUG09: 11:57:02
14AUG09: 12:00:31
14AUG09:11:23:21
14AUG09:13:26:12
14AUG09:13:32:27
14AUG09:13:35:39
14AUG09:13:39:43
14AUG09:13:47:34
14AUG09:13:48:58
14AUG09: 12: 19:43
14AUG09: 16:27:42
14AUG09: 16:30:39
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
39
53
37
15
13
13
51
36
49
36
16
14
12
37
53
38
52
17
15
15
53
38
54
35
13
15
10
37
37
53
58
18
14
11
52
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
26
17
22
3
17
15
14
18
27
20
16
15
14
23
29
22
9
16
14
23
12
32
32
20
6
12
14
20
19
16
39
19
16
7
20
22
Temperature (F)
88
86
87
90
90
95
88
96
88
96
102
102
98
74
73
74
73
74
75
74
74
79
74
78
81
81
77
82
82
77
76
83
83
82
85
79
oj
89
144
236
899
427
672
184
70
217
100
816
307
92
155
156
166
117
99
94
222
106
178
155
234
46
65
443
258
284
169
312
375
386
75
129
204
EI23 Bin
2
3
4
5
5
6
4
2
4
3
6
5
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
1
2
5
4
5
4
5
5
5
2
3
4
O
©
•3
342
707
2899
1008
52
33
76
10
624
314
288
208
137
188
23
169
163
53
160
163
69
153
29
73
1976
397
271
296
242
1088
939
19
32
122
O
s>
©
•3
157
686
510
23662
-953
592
-69
12
20
-1
487
66
187
128
92
199
-17
145
111
46
169
145
69
47
21
24
767
401
205
214
113
183
137
19
1
-72
O
0
9
0.13
0.05
0.45
0.29
0.15
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.07
0.06
3.54
0.58
0.50
0.59
0.73
0.52
0.49
0.63
0.10
0.03
0.32
0.15
0.21
0.44
0.13
-0.05
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.01
^
©
1
926
2109
1129
2694
1516
149
880
116
756
544
1342
2666
2661
2159
1791
2344
2418
306
393
159
1197
82
42
59
434
159
-6
-7
116
40
280
-7
-12
595
9
14.92
14.92
14.61
14.72
14.89
15.02
15.00
15.01
14.96
14.98
12.46
14.54
14.59
14.55
14.47
14.60
14.61
14.59
14.96
15.02
14.78
14.94
14.90
14.74
14.89
15.07
15.04
15.03
15.04
15.01
15.00
15.02
15.02
15.02
F-30
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
365
365
365
365
365
367
367
367
367
367
367
367
367
367
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
371
371
371
371
371
371
371
375
375
375
375
375
375
375
379
Year
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1993
Make
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Land Rover
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Subaru
Model
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Discovery
Discovery
Discovery
Discovery
Discovery
Discovery
Discovery
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Corolla
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Focus
Legacy
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
14AUG09: 16:34:33
14AUG09: 16:38:48
14AUG09: 16:47:40
14AUG09: 16:48:56
14AUG09: 16:50:36
14AUG09:13:34:05
14AUG09:15:00:03
14AUG09:15:03:01
14AUG09:15:06:50
14AUG09:15:18:41
14AUG09:15:26:58
14AUG09:15:28:53
18AUG09:15:29:14
18AUG09: 15:3 1:34
17AUG09:08:34:11
17AUG09:09:48:28
17AUG09:09:51:08
17AUG09:09:54:09
17AUG09:09:57:27
17AUG09: 10:04:47
17AUG09: 10:06:22
17AUG09:08:39:23
17AUG09:13:10:47
17AUG09:13:14:49
17AUG09:13:17:47
17AUG09:13:21:06
17AUG09:13:29:03
17AUG09:13:29:49
17AUG09:10:23:15
17AUG09: 11:46:40
17AUG09: 11:56:05
17AUG09: 11:59:08
17AUG09:12:03:34
17AUG09: 12: 11:31
17AUG09:12:13:14
17AUG09:14:31:47
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
54
39
16
4
16
15
34
50
39
51
13
12
11
12
16
51
38
54
37
13
13
19
52
35
53
38
15
15
15
56
39
56
37
15
14
9
VSP (kW/Mg)
23
24
17
0
17
16
24
9
20
26
7
8
6
8
21
30
19
35
22
9
9
20
37
15
31
19
14
14
19
19
17
28
13
18
19
6
Temperature (F)
84
77
81
81
81
89
83
82
82
83
94
94
73
73
61
75
70
75
69
67
67
61
80
79
80
79
84
84
68
78
75
79
76
76
76
85
oj
154
300
70
109
80
858
375
148
365
200
769
1339
813
1010
85
124
243
174
303
137
118
39
199
215
219
259
87
76
53
171
303
185
307
98
72
164
EI23 Bin
4
5
2
3
2
6
5
3
5
4
6
7
6
6
2
3
4
4
5
3
3
1
4
4
4
4
2
2
1
4
5
4
5
3
2
4
O
©
•3
39
182
-25
11
26
911
413
270
348
262
1160
1882
551
1026
15
-8
88
37
127
24
16
173
261
449
17
45
7
164
300
-3
23
7
27
O
s>
©
•3
-22
-33
-62
-83
18
1117
275
286
402
253
1833
3890
521
1331
-24
-51
-101
-54
22
-33
15
208
345
254
475
112
27
-5
_9
-132
-6
165
-86
-3
1
2
O
0
9
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.50
1.17
3.72
0.61
1.24
0.82
0.49
0.46
0.42
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.24
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.94
3.63
4.08
0.00
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.10
-0.06
0.03
0.03
0.06
^
©
1
91
46
27
1781
12
620
1701
1402
718
1622
430
457
418
648
30
67
60
10
39
20
13
527
1114
892
1086
589
19
28
-107
9
-3
1260
725
9
15.02
15.05
15.05
14.99
15.03
11.78
14.14
12.33
14.58
14.10
14.41
14.63
14.69
14.70
15.03
15.04
15.05
14.88
15.04
15.05
15.04
14.36
12.40
12.09
15.01
14.96
15.04
15.05
14.98
15.10
15.03
14.99
14.99
F-31
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
379
379
379
379
379
379
381
381
381
381
381
381
381
383
383
383
383
383
383
383
385
385
385
385
385
385
385
387
387
387
387
387
Year
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Make
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Model
Legacy
Legacy
Legacy
Legacy
Legacy
Legacy
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Dakota
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
17AUG09:15:41:59
17AUG09:15:46:32
17AUG09:15:50:24
17AUG09:15:54:33
17AUG09:16:03:01
17AUG09: 16:04:03
17AUG09:15:14:17
17AUG09: 16:30:42
17AUG09: 16:34:24
17AUG09: 16:38:45
17AUG09: 16:42:42
17AUG09: 16:52:34
17AUG09:16:53:23
17AUG09: 16:59:41
18AUG09:09: 12:04
18AUG09:09:16:01
18AUG09:09:20:45
18AUG09:09:24:56
18AUG09:09:34:31
18AUG09:09:36:05
18AUG09:08:32:20
18AUG09: 11:05:22
18AUG09: 11:09:25
18AUG09:11:12:52
18AUG09:11:16:01
18AUG09: 11:24:44
18AUG09:11:25:38
18AUG09: 11:22:01
18AUG09:12:33:33
18AUG09:12:38:10
18AUG09:12:41:29
18AUG09:12:45:55
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
53
38
55
37
14
12
17
50
40
56
39
14
14
12
53
38
53
36
12
13
13
51
41
54
36
13
14
18
53
36
52
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
25
20
25
20
12
13
22
23
22
35
20
12
15
18
21
22
26
27
7
12
19
30
28
13
23
9
11
26
18
25
27
22
Temperature (F)
79
72
79
71
80
79
86
78
69
78
69
75
75
74
76
73
76
74
68
68
64
81
83
81
83
81
81
79
83
78
83
76
oj
117
238
179
264
81
126
190
290
339
134
317
142
112
830
179
260
151
179
89
145
138
181
280
191
319
110
70
99
142
307
105
288
EI23 Bin
3
4
4
4
2
3
4
5
5
3
5
3
3
6
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
4
5
4
5
3
2
3
3
5
3
5
O
©
•3
279
1
325
95
59
43
133
201
198
98
117
62
52
737
215
76
114
36
114
33
53
104
115
229
20
-2
13
46
241
72
83
O
s>
©
•3
146
-79
258
33
14
29
96
142
32
97
49
45
-18
557
58
-66
-179
129
20
66
10
13
29
-12
-90
-18
5
-36
53
204
-48
-1
O
0
9
3.60
0.07
4.58
0.72
0.14
0.10
2.00
0.91
0.64
0.65
0.47
0.37
0.35
4.76
0.03
0.65
0.04
0.05
0.30
4.40
4.45
0.12
0.38
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.09
0.00
^
©
1
840
740
736
343
496
520
1314
2646
2647
2892
2327
1853
1978
217
678
317
2627
1749
257
15
0
32
29
21
-7
4
254
105
32
193
7
9
12.43
14.98
11.74
14.52
14.94
14.96
13.57
14.30
14.50
14.48
14.63
14.72
14.73
11.61
15.00
14.58
14.93
14.95
14.83
11.90
11.86
14.96
14.78
15.03
15.04
15.04
15.01
15.00
15.05
14.98
15.05
F-32
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
387
387
391
391
391
391
391
391
391
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
393
393
393
393
393
393
393
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
396
396
Year
2000
2000
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2000
2000
Make
Jeep
Jeep
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Mercury
Mercury
Model
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Solara
Solara
Solara
Solara
Solara
Solara
Solara
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
Mystique
Mystique
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
DateTime
18AUG09:12:59:34
18AUG09:13:00:47
19AUG09: 10:09:08
19AUG09:! 1:19:52
19AUG09:11:23:16
19AUG09: 11:26:39
19AUG09: 11:42: 11
19AUG09: 11:49:50
19AUG09: 11:50:51
19AUG09: 12:24:37
19AUG09:14:03:09
19AUG09: 14:07: 14
19AUG09:14:13:25
19AUG09: 14: 16:36
19AUG09: 14:20:55
19AUG09: 14:28:20
19AUG09: 14:29:32
19AUG09: 12:41:55
19AUG09:15:04:25
19AUG09:15:08:23
19AUG09:15:12:20
19AUG09:15:16:22
19AUG09:15:30:23
19AUG09:15:32:16
19AUG09:13:53:27
20AUG09:09:28:45
20AUG09:09:32:04
20AUG09:09:35:11
20AUG09:09:38:22
20AUG09:09:45:58
20AUG09:09:47:06
19AUG09:14:15:38
19AUG09:16:35:00
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
13
15
15
51
40
52
38
12
13
17
49
35
33
51
34
15
13
13
33
52
37
53
13
12
14
58
45
56
38
13
13
12
50
VSP (kW/Mg)
8
14
19
20
22
24
25
8
10
23
18
25
26
34
21
14
14
22
19
28
19
29
10
14
13
27
26
27
25
10
16
11
36
Temperature (F)
78
78
76
83
79
84
79
81
81
83
85
82
82
85
82
94
94
84
84
84
84
84
100
100
87
74
71
74
71
66
66
93
85
oj
76
67
58
148
241
129
323
77
81
110
238
348
237
136
285
78
95
536
111
319
425
141
125
584
162
163
271
110
309
177
312
61
166
EI23 Bin
2
2
2
3
4
3
5
2
2
3
4
5
4
3
5
2
3
6
5
5
5
3
3
6
4
4
5
3
5
4
5
2
4
O
©
•3
5
13
-4
398
184
283
197
65
22
32
132
191
75
102
74
-3
-2
332
92
217
203
88
124
286
186
281
146
68
303
257
194
103
320
O
s>
©
•3
2
17
-1
264
97
254
-146
-24
-23
207
103
108
26
81
-33
12
2
-113
-4
114
120
64
97
254
243
76
-21
60
28
-328
62
71
193
O
0
9
-0.01
0.00
0.07
3.39
0.05
2.27
0.09
0.07
0.12
3.78
3.56
0.26
0.14
5.18
0.30
0.05
0.03
0.07
0.00
0.79
0.00
0.19
0.01
0.01
0.70
3.16
0.13
0.12
0.02
0.02
0.10
0.92
4.87
^
©
1
919
1120
412
1409
959
1877
600
173
189
43
409
91
18
179
35
20
26
469
3373
48
3243
71
1003
3518
82
541
-14
2159
14
165
82
50
76
9
15.03
15.01
14.99
12.56
14.97
13.35
14.96
15.00
14.96
12.34
12.48
14.86
14.95
11.33
14.84
15.01
15.03
14.98
14.93
14.48
14.93
14.91
15.00
14.91
14.54
12.76
14.96
14.89
15.03
15.02
14.97
14.39
11.55
F-33
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
396
396
396
396
396
397
397
397
397
397
397
397
397
397
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
402
402
402
402
402
402
402
404
404
404
404
404
404
404
404
Year
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
Make
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Mercury
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Lexus
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Isuzu
Model
Mystique
Mystique
Mystique
Mystique
Mystique
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
Freestyle
SC300
SC300
SC300
SC300
SC300
SC300
SC300
Elantra
Elantra
Elantra
Elantra
Elantra
Elantra
Elantra
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Rodeo
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
19AUG09: 16:38:28
19AUG09:16:42:18
19AUG09: 16:46:32
19AUG09:16:55:17
19AUG09:16:58:18
19AUG09: 16:32:51
20 AUG09:1 1:11:24
20 AUG09:1 1:14:38
20 AUG09:1 1:17:28
20 AUG09: 11:20:42
20 AUG09: 11:24:02
20 AUG09: 11:28:20
20AUG09: 11:40:28
20 AUG09: 11:41:30
20 AUG09: 10:42:20
20AUG09:12:12:43
20AUG09:12:16:12
20AUG09:12:19:40
20 AUG09: 12:22:45
20AUG09:12:30:14
20AUG09:12:31:15
20 AUG09:1 1:13:08
20AUG09:13:50:09
20AUG09:13:53:21
20AUG09:13:56:15
20AUG09:13:59:30
20 AUG09: 14:07:00
20 AUG09: 14:08:07
20AUG09:13:17:53
20AUG09:16:43:15
20 AUG09: 16:46:22
20AUG09: 16:50: 19
20AUG09: 16:54:22
20AUG09:17:03:14
20AUG09:17:04:19
26AUG09:08:48:19
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Speed (mph)
37
55
35
14
12
11
50
35
53
33
52
38
16
14
16
37
54
38
55
14
13
13
52
39
56
38
15
13
17
52
38
53
36
13
12
12
VSP (kW/Mg)
19
17
18
13
14
16
34
23
34
17
27
20
-33
12
20
22
60
23
32
11
12
17
18
28
29
23
17
13
12
25
23
23
19
14
10
8
Temperature (F)
85
85
85
103
104
103
81
77
81
77
81
77
77
77
72
80
81
80
81
82
82
75
82
80
83
80
92
92
85
82
85
82
85
103
103
67
oj
229
220
260
74
90
84
250
256
177
272
167
215
53
75
88
223
314
292
207
100
121
77
122
484
195
403
93
86
93
98
285
186
326
83
85
95
EI23 Bin
4
4
4
2
3
2
4
4
4
5
4
4
1
2
2
4
5
5
4
3
3
2
3
5
4
5
3
2
3
3
5
4
5
2
2
3
O
©
•3
132
150
149
-25
-27
-14
56
80
-1
-2
-2
3
264
272
299
53
1
12
1264
365
-20
-7
91
470
174
301
294
6
38
31
O
s>
©
•3
-236
102
-43
-80
-115
16
-82
12
-36
-93
-47
119
-156
-15
-23
114
-133
85
-78
-5
10
372
60
40
-605
253
-91
65
55
379
4
199
196
12
42
51
O
0
9
-0.02
8.64
0.14
0.20
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.04
-0.02
0.07
0.07
0.01
0.02
-0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.79
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.34
4.10
0.22
1.90
0.08
0.07
0.11
0.09
^
©
1
-18
44
-13
-12
38
-13
136
50
60
-61
-17
832
178
1898
247
16
40
21
-35
-27
15
-69
258
1371
586
1880
168
234
210
32
9
15.06
8.85
14.95
14.91
14.90
15.05
15.04
15.03
15.02
15.07
15.00
14.98
15.03
14.96
15.05
15.04
15.04
15.04
14.45
14.99
15.03
15.01
14.80
12.05
14.87
13.62
14.98
14.99
14.97
14.99
F-34
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
404
405
405
405
405
405
405
405
416
416
416
416
416
416
416
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
424
424
424
425
425
425
425
Year
1998
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1970
1970
1970
1998
1998
1998
1998
Make
Isuzu
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
VW
vw
VW
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Model
Rodeo
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Cavalier
Protege
Protege
Protege
Protege
Protege
Protege
Protege
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Grand
Cherokee
Beetle
Beetle
Beetle
Eclipse
Eclipse
Eclipse
Eclipse
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
26AUG09:08:49:43
20AUG09:13:25:04
20 AUG09: 15:22:23
20AUG09:15:26:19
20AUG09:15:30:10
20 AUG09: 15:34:07
20 AUG09: 15:43:32
20 AUG09: 15:44:37
21 AUG09: 10:29:47
21 AUG09: 11:40:56
21 AUG09: 11:42:32
21 AUG09: 11:47:08
21 AUG09: 11:48:44
21 AUG09: 11:56:27
21 AUG09: 11:57:25
21 AUG09: 12:41:37
21AUG09:13:51:46
21AUG09:13:56:00
21AUG09:13:57:33
21AUG09:14:03:26
21 AUG09: 14:09:50
21AUG09:14:10:54
21AUG09:15:07:35
21 AUG09: 16:32:40
21AUG09:16:33:43
24AUG09:08:47:43
24AUG09:09:58:08
24AUG09:10:05:04
24AUG09: 10:09:21
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
13
16
52
37
51
34
12
12
12
35
54
37
53
14
13
13
51
39
52
39
13
14
13
13
11
13
51
54
37
VSP (kW/Mg)
10
18
18
21
18
26
6
9
10
23
34
19
29
14
13
15
35
26
14
22
10
10
10
13
10
11
24
26
26
Temperature (F)
67
87
83
84
83
84
99
99
73
74
84
75
85
79
79
83
87
80
87
82
96
96
102
107
107
73
81
81
80
oj
83
66
177
274
245
256
82
118
177
120
185
94
110
83
94
187
261
77
229
88
118
103
766
90
176
57
84
125
75
EI23 Bin
2
2
4
5
4
4
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
2
3
4
4
2
4
2
3
3
5
2
4
1
2
3
2
O
©
•3
60
184
278
650
232
10
63
20
24
68
80
-4
16
125
273
-5
458
11
156
112
4839
1249
1010
36
123
170
-5
O
s>
©
•3
34
210
204
-166
865
285
-8
71
-5
4
-118
89
15
-16
16
140
24
13
394
-57
73
5
6587
638
202
23
125
78
-2
O
0
9
0.12
2.56
4.27
4.12
2.15
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.10
0.03
4.88
0.07
0.19
0.27
2.13
0.32
4.00
0.07
0.14
0.12
4.53
3.41
2.50
0.09
0.27
2.56
-0.01
^
©
1
115
285
366
645
174
-13
295
817
632
3143
630
941
349
808
1928
349
1099
422
322
501
1309
1775
2007
511
780
1017
152
9
14.96
13.20
11.97
12.06
13.50
15.00
14.97
14.94
14.96
14.91
11.53
14.97
14.91
14.83
13.45
14.81
12.14
14.99
14.94
14.95
11.61
12.51
13.16
14.97
14.83
13.18
15.05
F-35
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
425
425
425
427
427
427
427
427
427
427
428
428
428
428
428
428
428
430
430
430
430
430
430
430
431
431
431
431
431
431
431
437
437
437
437
437
Year
1998
1998
1998
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
Make
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Model
Eclipse
Eclipse
Eclipse
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
Land Cruiser
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
Wrangler
3000 GT
3000 GT
3000 GT
3000 GT
3000 GT
3000 GT
3000 GT
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
S-10
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
DateTime
24AUG09:10:11:19
24AUG09: 10: 19:24
24AUG09: 10:20:20
24AUG09:09: 19:40
24AUG09:13:25:35
24AUG09:13:32:10
24AUG09:13:36:18
24AUG09:13:42:08
24AUG09:13:49:48
24AUG09:13:50:55
24AUG09:09:27:42
24AUG09: 14:58:06
24AUG09: 15:03:43
24AUG09:15:06:17
24AUG09: 15: 11:42
24AUG09:15:20:03
24AUG09: 15:21:22
24AUG09: 10:30:27
24AUG09: 11:46:47
24AUG09: 11:52:03
24AUG09:11:53:41
24AUG09: 11:59:05
24AUG09:12:05:54
24AUG09: 12:07:00
24AUG09:10:33:25
24AUG09: 16:34:51
24AUG09: 16:39:35
24AUG09: 16:42: 19
24AUG09: 16:47:47
24AUG09:16:55:41
24AUG09: 16:57:09
24AUG09: 14: 12:37
25AUG09:14:05:53
25AUG09:14:13:16
25 AUG09: 14:20:35
25 AUG09: 14:26:57
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
34
14
14
13
48
35
44
38
12
14
15
46
39
50
42
13
13
12
54
39
54
42
13
12
15
51
35
52
35
15
13
15
33
35
51
52
VSP (kW/Mg)
16
11
12
14
28
15
25
19
10
10
14
25
20
24
23
12
11
18
39
26
10
34
9
11
25
24
28
27
23
14
11
16
18
19
21
24
Temperature (F)
81
80
80
80
83
85
83
86
87
87
80
83
85
83
84
80
80
81
81
87
81
87
85
85
81
80
74
79
74
76
76
88
68
67
66
66
oj
131
65
73
355
125
71
205
132
871
3625
574
572
234
615
119
1305
895
171
89
80
96
73
94
82
167
128
62
120
61
66
107
70
202
234
173
226
EI23 Bin
3
2
2
5
3
2
4
3
6
7
5
5
3
5
2
7
6
4
2
2
3
2
3
2
4
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
4
4
4
4
O
©
•3
43
3
7
1364
388
497
355
666
2422
2857
6058
5274
5817
4378
5210
4576
4490
148
39
-17
29
43
21
-2
500
175
61
115
20
180
143
316
204
170
173
164
O
s>
©
•3
-103
12
6
1235
375
417
281
504
2687
4244
5217
4909
5316
2953
4124
3939
3923
-28
100
-4
-95
6
-5
-21
475
87
36
10
10
130
127
317
61
66
-21
34
O
0
9
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.82
2.66
0.10
2.76
0.19
1.32
0.44
6.66
3.49
4.91
3.28
6.14
3.80
4.42
0.07
0.02
0.02
1.62
0.35
0.03
0.03
1.79
0.37
0.20
0.25
0.04
0.17
0.21
4.21
0.34
0.22
0.28
0.19
^
©
1
52
240
26
1308
1816
1610
1858
2597
1405
2054
649
1396
727
1254
613
701
640
18
149
37
-32
3
22
30
931
678
430
2047
854
469
194
743
1328
224
2751
2473
9
15.03
15.03
15.03
12.94
13.07
14.91
13.00
14.80
13.98
14.58
10.07
12.34
11.33
12.53
10.48
12.17
11.73
15.00
15.04
15.04
13.89
14.80
15.03
15.03
13.72
14.76
14.89
14.79
15.00
14.91
14.89
12.00
14.75
14.88
14.75
14.82
F-36
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
437
437
438
438
438
438
438
438
438
439
439
439
439
439
439
439
454
454
454
454
454
454
454
460
460
460
460
460
460
460
466
466
466
466
466
466
Year
1991
1991
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
Make
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
Pontiac
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
BMW
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Dodge
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Acura
Model
S-10
S-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
C-10
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
Grand Prix
M6
M6
M6
M6
M6
M6
M6
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
Durango
RSX
RSX
RSX
RSX
RSX
RSX
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
25AUG09:14:34:19
25AUG09:14:35:21
24AUG09: 14:37:48
25 AUG09: 16:26:22
25AUG09:16:30:18
25 AUG09: 16:34:28
25AUG09:16:38:12
25AUG09:16:46:01
25 AUG09: 16:47:07
24AUG09: 15:03:46
25AUG09:15:36:08
25AUG09:15:40:14
25 AUG09: 15:44:33
25AUG09:15:48:10
25AUG09:15:57:23
25AUG09:15:58:31
25AUG09:13:59:57
25 AUG09: 14:54:24
25 AUG09: 15:02:09
25AUG09:15:10:21
25AUG09:15:18:27
25 AUG09: 15:27:03
25AUG09:15:30:09
26AUG09:09:47:04
26AUG09:10:51:37
26AUG09:10:55:39
26AUG09: 10:58:43
26AUG09:11:03:13
26AUG09:! 1:12:52
26AUG09:11:13:57
27 AUG09: 12:06:30
27AUG09:13:27:54
27AUG09:13:30:45
27AUG09:13:33:50
27AUG09:13:38:33
27AUG09:13:46:22
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
13
14
15
37
53
37
53
12
13
12
53
40
55
31
13
14
16
53
51
35
35
13
10
18
55
36
54
36
11
11
10
52
41
54
36
14
VSP (kW/Mg)
10
10
15
19
18
20
21
9
9
11
33
21
28
19
11
12
19
37
36
11
13
10
8
24
25
20
15
24
7
7
15
30
21
36
30
14
Temperature (F)
71
69
86
71
73
72
73
75
75
83
72
72
72
72
79
79
73
63
64
66
66
73
73
67
77
83
77
83
80
81
84
85
86
85
88
91
oj
104
73
723
111
189
256
232
531
1391
1310
90
173
166
326
42
112
342
147
255
242
196
140
202
89
229
256
179
370
159
133
125
162
179
210
316
100
EI23 Bin
3
2
6
4
4
4
4
5
7
7
2
4
4
5
1
3
5
3
4
4
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
5
4
3
3
4
4
4
5
3
O
©
•3
47
19
3478
522
372
1117
429
3412
2717
2541
262
-36
172
11
16
45
195
142
20
21
18
188
189
78
364
87
76
38
86
49
18
114
13
O
s>
©
•3
75
17
3486
353
364
603
324
4307
1985
1363
299
-104
-197
56
13
-2
403
-48
127
-75
-26
6
13
-52
111
-127
44
-287
-23
-47
-13
16
-90
-60
-48
19
O
0
9
0.06
0.05
6.04
1.88
6.99
1.51
7.54
0.81
0.74
2.16
6.88
0.14
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.11
0.30
0.05
0.23
-0.01
0.02
0.05
0.14
-0.02
0.05
1.96
0.01
0.03
^
©
1
1223
1607
731
1850
626
1902
416
2439
2196
29
138
210
272
253
93
3
99
156
25
16
1708
490
57
40
2330
334
23
31
53
45
6
-5
6
9
14.97
14.96
10.59
13.63
10.01
13.87
9.62
14.28
14.36
13.43
10.11
14.95
15.01
15.02
15.02
15.03
15.05
15.04
15.02
15.04
14.92
14.82
15.01
14.88
14.96
15.03
15.01
14.95
15.07
15.01
13.65
15.04
15.03
F-37
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
466
468
468
468
468
468
468
468
469
469
469
469
469
469
469
475
475
475
475
475
475
475
481
481
481
481
481
481
481
482
482
482
482
482
482
482
Year
2003
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2004
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
2003
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
Make
Acura
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Model
RSX
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Outback
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Pathfinder
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Astro
Frontier
Frontier
Frontier
Frontier
Frontier
Frontier
Frontier
Stanza
Stanza
Stanza
Stanza
Stanza
Stanza
Stanza
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
27AUG09:13:47:28
27AUG09:13:01:48
27AUG09:15:14:35
27AUG09:15:18:16
27 AUG09: 15:22:39
27AUG09:15:26:09
27 AUG09: 15:35:40
27AUG09:15:36:47
27AUG09:13:03:58
27 AUG09: 14:01:58
27AUG09:14:05:46
27 AUG09: 14:08:36
27AUG09:14:13:09
27 AUG09: 14:20:47
27 AUG09: 14:21:53
27 AUG09: 15:21:29
27AUG09:16:35:11
27AUG09:16:38:18
27 AUG09: 16:42:24
27 AUG09: 16:46:21
27AUG09:16:55:13
27 AUG09: 16:57:54
28AUG09:08:26:52
28AUG09:09:32:21
28AUG09:09:36:54
28AUG09:09:39:53
28AUG09:09:43:15
28AUG09:09:51:27
28AUG09:09:52:26
28AUG09:08:50:04
28AUG09:10:51:29
28AUG09: 10:54:27
28AUG09: 10:58:35
28AUG09: 11:02:03
28AUG09: 11:09:53
28AUG09:! 1:11:22
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
15
10
51
39
53
40
14
12
13
43
37
54
37
12
12
11
49
38
53
37
13
13
12
52
38
55
37
13
13
14
52
36
53
37
15
13
VSP (kW/Mg)
13
13
32
22
37
22
13
12
11
31
17
38
19
9
9
14
27
19
25
19
9
8
13
26
22
25
23
9
10
15
21
21
24
21
14
14
Temperature (F)
91
87
85
89
86
89
99
99
87
85
89
85
89
95
95
98
84
89
84
88
102
102
67
83
74
83
74
70
70
68
87
82
87
82
74
74
oj
78
73
140
253
144
181
71
77
85
212
354
237
329
92
90
1035
273
270
234
175
3560
457
64
228
259
261
254
115
86
75
323
370
137
279
144
85
EI23 Bin
2
2
3
4
3
4
2
2
2
4
5
4
5
3
2
6
5
5
4
4
7
5
2
4
4
4
4
3
2
2
5
5
3
5
3
2
O
©
•3
-1
-12
173
207
118
133
15
-22
40
118
116
85
184
36
30
438
86
234
216
267
1444
731
28
245
121
75
158
35
20
69
59
143
-1
90
82
19
O
s>
©
•3
-4
-90
152
-20
94
-16
36
-45
32
-5
-62
38
-26
-66
75
662
-91
-177
262
-172
1537
558
-109
335
-10
78
-32
-30
-12
38
-259
-98
-104
40
69
10
O
0
9
0.05
0.02
2 12
-0.02
5.85
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.10
5.04
0.01
4.71
-0.02
0.06
0.02
0.12
0.08
0.02
0.19
0.05
0.29
0.44
0.00
10.58
0.05
5.74
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.97
0.27
0.71
0.21
0.57
0.35
0.16
^
©
1
10
-5
19
52
-2
98
3
6
26
415
218
318
284
231
12
380
717
524
1217
267
67
59
-14
28
23
76
15
4
239
173
836
363
360
206
282
217
9
15.01
15.04
13.53
15.06
10.86
15.04
15.02
15.04
14.98
11.42
15.03
11.67
15.05
15.00
15.04
14.94
14.97
15.01
14.87
15.00
14.80
14.72
15.05
7.46
15.01
10.93
15.01
15.05
15.02
14.35
14.83
14.53
14.89
14.64
14.79
14.93
F-38
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
486
486
486
486
486
486
486
489
489
489
489
489
489
489
489
494
494
494
494
494
494
494
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
498
498
498
498
498
498
498
Year
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
Make
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Mazda
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Buick
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Model
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Cherokee
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
Bronco
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
MX-6
Century
Century
Century
Century
Century
Century
Century
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
28AUG09:09:56:37
28AUG09: 12:30:39
28AUG09: 12:34:32
28AUG09: 12:37:50
28AUG09: 12:42:00
28AUG09:12:49:15
28AUG09: 12:50:34
28AUG09: 11:26:04
28AUG09:14:05:36
28AUG09:14:13:55
28AUG09: 14:22:31
28AUG09: 14:28:42
28AUG09: 14:36: 12
28AUG09:14:43:57
28AUG09:14:45:12
28AUG09: 12:58:06
28AUG09:15:46:39
28AUG09:15:50:18
28AUG09:15:54:04
28AUG09:15:58:17
28AUG09: 16:09:57
28AUG09:16:11:10
28AUG09: 14:41:39
31AUG09:10:13:11
31AUG09:10:16:54
3 1AUG09: 10:20:09
31AUG09:10:25:33
31AUG09:10:33:10
31AUG09:10:34:10
28AUG09:15:00:38
31AUG09:11:15:39
31AUG09:! 1:19:37
31AUG09:11:23:36
31AUG09:11:28:18
3 1AUG09: 11:38:39
3 1AUG09: 11:39:30
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
14
50
35
54
38
15
3
13
46
48
46
32
34
11
11
15
53
36
52
37
17
14
11
55
37
55
36
12
13
10
52
33
52
37
15
15
VSP (kW/Mg)
12
25
18
25
22
19
0
14
13
22
18
16
15
6
7
19
23
22
1
23
12
19
12
36
23
49
23
10
9
13
50
23
34
19
18
17
Temperature (F)
70
85
85
85
86
81
81
74
84
84
84
84
84
98
98
81
85
87
86
87
105
105
98
79
72
77
73
70
70
100
88
84
88
85
77
77
oj
55
193
588
219
394
129
110
4431
364
1171
433
339
313
8618
5404
219
214
307
258
173
72
116
183
159
240
231
335
109
90
59
213
239
178
385
71
72
EI23 Bin
1
4
6
4
5
3
3
7
4
6
5
5
5
7
7
4
4
5
4
4
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
2
2
4
4
4
5
2
2
O
©
•3
356
155
303
237
175
192
249
3452
3872
3948
2090
1674
888
4132
8811
595
51
111
76
478
572
34
109
270
235
250
266
178
66
388
168
166
143
1
29
O
s>
©
•3
306
182
-30
7
-200
130
158
3419
3994
3231
1785
1044
1178
3047
9569
722
63
34
1013
-1
492
384
-58
100
206
287
31
335
102
64
406
157
16
-94
-11
111
O
0
9
0.70
0.42
0.09
0.90
0.07
2.58
2.94
4.27
10.80
10.13
8.57
6.37
1.39
0.58
0.71
3.82
0.18
0.22
0.08
4.47
3.80
-0.05
0.41
0.11
1.15
0.04
0.31
0.12
0.59
5.70
1.73
2.74
0.02
0.21
0.34
^
©
1
3865
2092
688
1238
662
340
276
381
410
316
275
209
181
486
129
275
2961
860
318
315
121
2009
980
189
824
290
1321
578
111
489
-30
114
84
89
119
9
14.40
14.67
14.95
14.36
14.97
13.18
12.93
11.88
7.18
7.66
8.84
10.43
14.03
14.49
14.28
12.29
14.81
14.86
14.98
11.82
12.31
15.02
14.72
14.96
14.19
15.01
14.78
14.94
14.62
10.94
13.81
13.08
15.03
14.90
14.81
F-39
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
507
507
507
507
507
507
507
512
512
512
512
512
512
512
517
517
517
517
517
517
517
521
521
521
521
521
521
521
527
Year
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1995
Make
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Eagle
Model
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
F150
Sequoia
Sequoia
Sequoia
Sequoia
Sequoia
Sequoia
Sequoia
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Santa Fe
Lumina
Lumina
Lumina
Lumina
Lumina
Lumina
Lumina
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Sentra
Talon
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
31AUG09:09:01:58
3 1AUG09: 14:04:07
3 1AUG09: 14:09:28
31AUG09:14:12:24
31AUG09:14:15:38
3 1AUG09: 14:24:37
31AUG09:14:28:18
31AUG09:09:57:39
3 1AUG09: 12:32:00
3 1AUG09: 12:40:41
3 1AUG09: 12:44:58
31AUG09:12:48:14
31AUG09:13:04:45
31AUG09:13:05:49
31AUG09:! 1:18:24
3 1AUG09: 16:28:52
31AUG09:16:32:13
3 1AUG09: 16:36:09
3 1AUG09: 16:40:22
31AUG09:16:49:10
3 1AUG09: 16:50:07
31AUG09:13:07:15
01SEP09:10:01:57
01SEP09:10:08:17
01SEP09:10:09:46
01SEP09:10:14:27
01SEP09:10:20:48
01SEP09:10:21:50
31AUG09:14:03:22
31AUG09:15:28:55
31AUG09:15:32:08
31AUG09:15:36:05
31AUG09:15:40:11
31AUG09:15:56:22
31AUG09:15:57:23
31AUG09:15:19:13
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
12
48
37
49
36
12
13
18
37
38
58
53
14
15
14
55
36
51
35
15
15
13
55
37
54
37
14
14
12
44
37
51
38
13
12
12
VSP (kW/Mg)
5
26
22
27
24
12
11
21
19
23
24
50
12
10
20
25
22
29
20
20
17
12
22
19
23
20
13
12
10
25
18
23
16
10
6
13
Temperature (F)
63
82
82
82
85
85
85
70
83
83
83
81
85
85
74
82
79
81
79
81
81
85
94
77
94
77
77
77
83
83
84
84
84
86
86
82
oj
260
119
321
178
389
89
127
69
309
263
313
243
78
72
103
85
246
135
326
94
87
68
99
52
118
74
105
103
78
88
124
101
190
87
84
1293
EI23 Bin
4
3
5
4
5
2
3
2
5
4
5
4
2
2
3
2
4
3
5
3
2
2
3
1
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
4
2
2
7
O
©
•3
148
417
237
205
209
167
103
-14
41
130
125
121
-23
-3
20
-13
107
30
148
-5
4
-3
26
-27
-12
7
35
32
294
73
212
23
328
316
2043
O
s>
©
•3
-74
271
-9
233
-235
100
60
8
-77
-27
75
-28
-24
-31
49
-50
18
15
-34
-53
-51
-9
-53
20
-211
-27
-4
20
10
312
-27
140
-73
481
297
2642
O
0
9
0.09
5.06
0.00
4.14
0.02
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.02
2.39
7.05
-0.02
0.06
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.11
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.04
6.27
0.02
5.92
0.05
2.62
1.34
2.74
^
©
1
153
420
623
579
645
672
659
281
30
40
229
114
35
32
-31
41
-13
116
8
-8
3
233
572
561
394
566
556
1348
130
89
83
225
266
140
237
9
14.98
11.40
15.02
12.06
15.01
14.97
15.00
15.04
15.03
15.03
13.33
9.99
15.06
15.01
15.03
14.98
15.05
15.02
15.05
15.04
15.04
15.03
15.02
14.96
15.03
15.01
14.99
14.98
10.55
15.04
10.80
15.01
13.15
14.08
13.02
F-40
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
527
527
527
527
527
527
527
540
540
540
540
540
540
540
542
542
542
542
542
542
542
546
546
546
546
546
546
546
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
550
Year
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1992
Make
Eagle
Eagle
Eagle
Eagle
Eagle
Eagle
Eagle
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Subaru
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Geo
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
Talon
Talon
Talon
Talon
Talon
Talon
Talon
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
Accord
GL10
GL10
GL10
GL10
GL10
GL10
GL10
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Prizm
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Ranger F250
Taurus
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Location
Caryl&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
01SEP09:11:20:46
01SEP09: 11:27:00
01SEP09:11:28:54
01SEP09:11:33:14
01SEP09:11:34:52
01SEP09:11:51:45
01SEP09:11:53:14
01SEP09:13:40:20
01SEP09:14:36:23
01SEP09: 14:43:09
01SEP09:14:44:41
01SEP09: 14:49:23
01SEP09:14:55:43
01SEP09:14:56:44
01SEP09:15:55:19
01SEP09:17:07:32
01SEP09:17:10:12
01SEP09: 17: 15:30
01SEP09:17:17:56
01SEP09: 17:25:26
01SEP09:17:26:22
02SEP09:09:10:10
02SEP09: 11:47:44
02SEP09: 11:5 1:35
02SEP09: 11:54:31
02SEP09: 11:57:55
02SEP09: 12:07:05
02SEP09: 12:08:06
02SEP09:09: 11:11
02SEP09: 10:26:29
02SEP09:10:30:14
02SEP09:10:33:10
02SEP09: 10:36:34
02SEP09:10:45:53
02SEP09: 10:46:59
02SEP09: 14: 19:25
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
35
36
50
37
54
13
13
15
47
40
52
35
14
15
14
41
45
40
51
13
15
14
52
36
51
36
14
14
16
49
36
51
37
14
12
12
VSP (kW/Mg)
19
15
23
25
34
12
11
19
28
15
28
18
12
16
15
23
29
22
32
12
14
15
31
21
31
20
13
14
22
30
21
33
25
8
8
8
Temperature (F)
84
84
91
85
92
86
86
96
91
89
91
89
100
100
96
83
86
83
86
90
90
72
90
85
89
82
84
84
72
84
78
84
83
76
76
97
oj
63
299
112
110
171
267
566
427
172
47
247
78
334
1050
80
49
160
81
149
51
87
249
201
143
93
222
460
526
385
197
274
162
222
82
85
3050
EI23 Bin
2
5
3
3
4
4
6
5
4
1
4
2
5
7
2
1
4
2
3
1
2
4
4
3
2
4
5
6
5
4
4
3
4
2
2
7
O
©
•3
169
324
713
611
1103
770
333
66
80
128
161
933
694
25
61
175
183
-8
-10
668
323
182
405
448
1745
1219
1318
1341
696
1432
909
1161
1300
4015
O
s>
©
•3
110
226
331
518
481
831
672
45
37
47
52
129
933
237
60
-3
22
148
69
-14
-25
339
266
172
319
399
-135
-1155
504
728
663
1625
724
624
554
-2117
O
0
9
0.04
3.28
0.14
4.66
0.08
0.08
1.30
1.28
0.01
-0.03
0.05
0.03
0.03
1.20
5.72
3.95
8.89
0.53
0.05
0.22
5.22
0.18
5.04
0.43
0.54
0.52
8.42
8.15
4.05
8.70
3.40
4.39
4.37
0.14
^
©
1
1148
317
1520
594
1258
1260
-27
-29
18
13
-11
-35
38
91
10
72
49
133
197
849
743
729
565
250
647
434
486
515
1601
585
1618
714
792
301
9
14.98
12.68
14.88
11.68
14.92
14.93
14.12
14.14
15.05
15.07
15.01
15.00
15.01
14.19
10.95
12.21
8.67
14.67
15.01
14.85
11.28
14.89
11.41
14.72
14.59
14.63
8.96
9.15
12.07
8.75
12.53
11.84
11.85
14.82
F-41
-------
Table F-2. Selection RSMs and Measurement RSMs for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to
vehicle)
550
550
550
550
550
550
559
559
559
559
559
559
559
563
563
563
563
563
563
563
568
568
568
568
568
568
568
Year
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1992
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
Make
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Saturn
Model
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Regency
Regency
Regency
Regency
Regency
Regency
Regency
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
Remote Sensing Measurement (RSM)
Type
(Selection;
Measurement)
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Selection
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Measurement
Location
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
Kipling&470
Caryl&470
IMStationDriveway
IMStationDriveway
DateTime
02SEP09:15:18:55
02SEP09:15:21:55
02SEP09:15:25:47
02SEP09:15:30:39
02SEP09:15:38:37
02SEP09:15:39:44
03SEP09:12:12:14
03SEP09:13:12:59
03SEP09:13:19:07
03SEP09:13:20:37
03SEP09:13:26:39
03SEP09:13:34:26
03SEP09:13:35:24
03SEP09:14:53:24
03SEP09:15:56:40
03SEP09:16:01:12
03SEP09:16:03:51
03SEP09: 16:09:08
03SEP09: 16: 17:32
03SEP09:16:18:56
04SEP09: 10:38:59
04SEP09: 11:3 1:15
04SEP09: 11:36:37
04SEP09: 11:38:08
04SEP09: 11:44:07
04SEP09: 11:50:44
04SEP09:11:51:10
Timing
(RSM is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Speed (mph)
54
36
55
34
12
10
14
53
39
54
37
14
15
16
56
39
57
39
13
13
16
55
39
55
38
12
14
VSP (kW/Mg)
-3
19
1
17
8
6
14
22
21
17
20
14
12
23
24
25
31
24
11
13
20
22
21
23
20
7
1
Temperature (F)
86
87
85
89
102
102
85
87
82
87
82
92
92
100
84
83
84
82
89
89
75
94
79
94
79
83
83
oj
137
474
153
303
2959
2839
115
178
73
143
78
351
361
72
163
55
113
74
86
105
603
138
68
223
76
4456
439
EI23 Bin
3
5
3
4
7
7
3
4
2
3
2
5
5
2
4
1
3
2
2
3
6
3
2
4
2
7
5
O
©
•3
557
345
696
1847
3192
3000
389
226
157
-51
322
704
299
209
130
39
149
28
-8
-9
896
46
221
2848
O
s>
©
•3
467
120
596
1490
-395
-166
-148
304
109
-341
199
-832
-306
212
117
45
149
21
5
17
-707
_9
65
143
211
-980
778
O
0
9
5.39
0.10
1.01
-0.03
0.16
0.08
0.40
6.73
0.17
0.07
0.19
0.08
0.06
5.12
2.71
0.02
5.88
0.04
-0.01
0.01
2.92
0.02
0.03
0.10
^
©
1
241
248
230
-36
415
681
410
807
648
2600
676
1045
520
83
60
22
155
65
13
105
577
18
78
15
9
11.17
14.96
14.30
15.02
14.83
14.88
14.74
10.20
14.91
14.91
14.89
14.94
14.98
11.37
13.10
15.04
10.83
15.03
15.06
15.04
12.91
15.04
15.03
14.90
1
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are forced to zero.
Concentration calculated when the regression intercepts of HC, CO, and NO attenuations versus CO2 attenuation are not forced to
zero.
F-42
-------
Table F-3. Before-Repair and After-Repair PSHED Measurements for Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to vehicle)
7
9
9
17
17
18
20
21
25
27
27
28
28
34
34
39
42
44
45
46
48
48
49
53
57
62
64
68
69
75.096
77
77
79
79
82
85
91
91
92
Year
1998
1992
1992
1993
1993
2003
1990
1991
2000
1992
1992
1989
1989
1995
1995
1994
1987
1989
1997
1990
1994
1994
1994
1997
1996
2003
1976
2001
2002
1986
1987
1987
1988
1988
1993
1996
1977
1977
1997
Make
Ford
Saturn
Saturn
Mercury
Mercury
VW
Nissan
Jeep
Audi
Jeep
Jeep
Dodge
Dodge
Ford
Ford
Jeep
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Mazda
Pontiac
Ford
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Land Rover
Toyota
Saab
Saab
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Cadillac
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Model
Explorer
SL
SL
Grand Marquis
Grand Marquis
Passat
PSHED Measurement
Seal DateTime
29JUN09: 11:42:00
29JUN09:13:43:00
07JUL09:09:24:00
29 JUN09: 15:35:00
06JUL09:09: 10:00
29JUN09: 17:20:00
Pathfinder 30JUN09: 10:37:00
Wrangler | 30JUN09: 11:52:00
A6
Wrangler
Wrangler
Raider
Raider
Ranger
Ranger
Grand Cherokee
Power Ram
Caprice
F150
Taurus
Camaro
Camaro
929
Grand Am
Explorer XLT
Tundra
Omega
Wrangler
Freelander
MR2
900 Turbo
900 Turbo
1500 Pickup
1500 Pickup
El Dorado
Ram 1500
Blazer
Blazer
F150
30JUN09:13:54:00
30JUN09: 15:42:00
06JUL09: 10:20:00
30JUN09: 17: 16:00
02JUL09: 10:32:00
01JUL09: 13:21:00
07JUL09: 13:09:00
02JUL09:09:40:00
06JUL09: 12:38:00
06JUL09:16:01:00
06JUL09: 14:35:00
06JUL09: 16:33:00
06JUL09: 17:27:00
08JUL09: 14:35:00
07JUL09: 11:28:00
07JUL09:09:49:00
07JUL09: 12: 12:00
07JUL09: 17:29:00
08JUL09: 13:41:00
09JUL09: 10:5 1:00
08JUL09: 17:38:00
09JUL09: 15:48:00
09JUL09: 17:43:00
1 5 JUL09: 13:02:00
10JUL09: 13:59:00
16JUL09:09:21:00
10JUL09: 15:26:00
16JUL09: 12:32:00
15JUL09: 10:58:00
24JUL09:09:52:00
14JUL09: 11:08:00
Timing
(PSHED is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
After
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Seal Temperature
(F)
90
92
80
93
79
94
88
93
94
96
85
94
83
96
92
80
88
90
90
92
86
95
92
84
90
91
95
77
95
85
83
85
92
84
95
91
76
90
87
Final Temperature
(F)
98
98
98
99
99
100
98
100
104
105
105
104
104
106
106
90
102
97
101
97
91
91
98
90
97
98
102
91
105
92
90
90
102
102
104
101
92
92
96
Seal Barometric
Pressure
("Hg)
24.39
24.36
24.29
24.34
24.38
24.32
24.38
24.38
24.36
24.34
24.39
24.32
24.49
24.31
24.26
24.48
24.36
24.29
24.30
24.28
24.30
24.24
24.27
24.27
24.28
24.24
24.24
24.40
24.19
24.35
24.35
24.49
24.46
24.54
24.41
24.54
24.52
24.40
24.35
Measure PSHED HC
at 15 Minute Soak
(g/Qhr)
0.176
5.039
0.193
56.424
0.082
0.099
0.234
1.241
0.266
5.939
0.268
19.380
0.329
2.996
0.281
0.194
24.117
14.015
0.043
3.058
6.667
0.916
15.588
0.258
0.033
0.011
15.649
0.087
0.054
0.249
3.906
0.417
18.250
0.597
0.473
6.077
15.176
18.463
0.022
F-43
-------
Table F-3. Before-Repair and After-Repair PSHED Measurements for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to vehicle)
93
95
100
100
103.122
103.122
108
108
109
109
110
112
112
120
121
127
127
130
131
134
135
138
139
156
157
157
158
159
161
162.332
163
168
177
178
184
185
186
188
189
190
192
193
Year
2003
1998
1984
1984
1988
1988
1995
1995
1995
1995
2005
1986
1986
1989
1994
1993
1993
1995
1997
2003
2001
2002
2002
1999
1982
1982
2005
1990
2001
1995
2002
1994
2004
1969
1998
2002
1995
2005
1993
2001
1991
2003
Make
Dodge
Nissan
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Toyota
Toyota
Cadillac
Cadillac
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Isuzu
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Suzuki
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mazda
Saturn
Jeep
Volvo
Saturn
Dodge
VW
vw
Toyota
Ford
Lexus
GMC
Ford
Infmiti
Ford
Model
Durango
Quest
Suburban
Suburban
Camry
Camry
SLS
SLS
Avalon
Avalon
Avalon
LTD
LTD
Camaro
Amigo
Cherokee
Cherokee
Explorer
Outback
Impala
Sebring
Vitara
Sunfire
Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
Fl 50 Explorer
Cobalt
MX-6
SC-1
Wrangler
S60
SL2
Ram 1500
CP - Dunebuggy
Jetta
Echo
F150
GX-470
Safari
Expedition
Q45
Focus
PSHED Measurement
Seal DateTime
14JUL09: 13:21:00
15JUL09:09:19:00
15JUL09: 12:08:00
23 JUL09: 16:46:00
16JUL09: 10:49:00
17JUL09: 13:28:00
16JUL09: 14: 11:00
23 JUL09: 16:08:00
20JUL09: 15: 13:00
20JUL09: 15:53:00
16JUL09: 16:27:00
16JUL09: 15:47:00
07AUG09: 12:08:00
17JUL09: 12:00:00
17JUL09: 12:40:00
17JUL09: 17:00:00
24JUL09:09:02:00
20JUL09: 11:16:00
20JUL09: 12:30:00
20JUL09: 13:54:00
21 JUL09: 10:32:00
21 JUL09:09: 16:00
20JUL09: 17: 10:00
22JUL09: 11:34:00
22JUL09: 14:54:00
22JUL09: 15:28:00
22JUL09: 12:52:00
23JUL09:09:35:00
23 JUL09: 11:0 1:00
11AUG09: 14:21:00
23 JUL09: 13:44:00
23 JUL09: 15:03:00
24JUL09: 16:28:00
24JUL09: 13: 15:00
27JUL09:09:44:00
27JUL09: 10:50:00
27 JUL09: 11:58:00
27JUL09: 13:05:00
27JUL09: 14:44:00
28JUL09: 10:26:00
28JUL09:08:56:00
28JUL09:09:34:00
Timing
(PSHED is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Seal Temperature
(F)
93
74
82
96
88
93
91
96
95
92
92
92
93
90
92
93
85
90
91
92
75
74
90
83
94
95
85
81
89
91
94
96
100
99
77
82
85
88
87
72
71
74
Final Temperature
(F)
100
83
98
98
96
96
101
101
102
102
99
101
101
101
102
106
106
98
102
100
86
82
96
94
104
104
93
88
97
99
103
103
111
102
87
89
98
101
101
84
77
Seal Barometric
Pressure
("Hg)
24.32
24.53
24.50
24.38
24.55
24.55
24.53
24.37
24.32
24.33
24.52
24.51
24.22
24.56
24.56
24.50
24.40
24.38
24.37
24.36
24.48
24.51
24.35
24.45
24.42
24.41
24.44
24.42
24.40
24.50
24.39
24.36
24.35
24.37
24.50
24.49
24.47
24.45
24.41
24.44
24.44
24.45
Measure PSHED HC
at 15 Minute Soak
(g/Qhr)
0.051
0.451
10.130
20.847
5.011
7.744
22.449
0.256
2.352
0.066
0.038
9.116
0.517
20.322
0.115
26.376
0.523
0.049
0.100
0.024
0.047
0.020
0.027
0.015
5.074
3.217
0.015
0.728
0.015
0.166
0.052
25.565
0.034
1.975
0.137
0.018
0.145
0.015
0.282
0.045
0.043
0.053
F-44
-------
Table F-3. Before-Repair and After-Repair PSHED Measurements for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to vehicle)
194
197
203.205
203.205
212
213
214
217
218
219
220
221
232
238
246
249
252
255
261
262
263
266
271
278
285
290
294
295
301
302
305
306
309
311
316
320
321
321
325
327
329
331
Year
1994
2000
1991
1991
1977
1979
2000
1994
1990
1991
1994
1994
1992
1993
2003
1997
2002
2004
1994
1984
1997
2002
1997
2002
1998
2005
1985
1999
1981
1989
1997
1967
2001
2002
2003
2004
1997
1997
2000
1981
1969
1994
Make
Geo
Honda
Jeep
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
VW
Lexus
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Jeep
Chevrolet
BMW
Toyota
Lexus
GMC
Nissan
Honda
Chevrolet
GMC
Dodge
Honda
Acura
Ford
Mazda
GMC
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Nissan
VW
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
Jeep
Chevrolet
Model
Prizm
Accord
Wrangler
Wrangler
Econoline
D-150
S-10
Ranger
Cabriolet
LS400
Tacoma
Bronco
Explorer
Wrangler
Suburban
328i
Tacoma
RX330
Suburban
720
Accord
Tahoe
Sierra
Dakota
CRV
TSX
F150
626
Sierra Kl 500
Pickup
Ram 1500
Chevelle
Sentra
Passat
Accent
Cavalier
S-10
S-10
Prizm
320i
Commando
Blazer
PSHED Measurement
Seal DateTime
28JUL09: 11:27:00
28JUL09: 12:54:00
28JUL09: 14:45:00
3 1JUL09: 11:45:00
28JUL09: 16:58:00
29JUL09:09:46:00
29JUL09: 11:21:00
29JUL09: 13:46:00
29JUL09: 10:42:00
29 JUL09: 14:45:00
29JUL09: 15:47:00
29JUL09: 12:20:00
30JUL09: 13:36:00
30JUL09: 17: 15:00
31JUL09:10:51:00
31JUL09: 13:18:00
3 1JUL09: 16:27:00
31JUL09:17:11:00
03 AUG09: 12:58:00
03 AUG09: 14:07:00
03 AUG09: 11:48:00
12AUG09: 10: 19:00
04AUG09:08:58:00
04AUG09: 11:28:00
04AUG09:15:57:00
05AUG09:13:04:00
05AUG09: 14:59:00
05AUG09: 16:30:00
07AUG09:09: 11:00
06AUG09: 15:47:00
07AUG09: 10:58:00
06AUG09: 16:34:00
07AUG09: 14:57:00
07AUG09: 16: 12:00
10AUG09:09:36:00
10AUG09: 11:02:00
10AUG09:12:45:00
17AUG09: 10:57:00
11AUG09:09:40:00
10AUG09: 17:28:00
11AUG09: 11:00:00
11AUG09: 12:44:00
Timing
(PSHED is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Seal Temperature
(F)
73
74
76
89
77
75
76
73
77
75
75
73
65
70
84
87
83
82
94
93
95
86
78
87
94
88
91
92
85
85
89
81
96
94
74
79
86
76
79
86
87
90
Final Temperature
(F)
78
81
84
84
89
86
82
80
82
84
81
73
79
97
96
89
89
106
98
101
100
90
97
100
96
97
99
97
89
97
89
103
101
82
86
93
93
86
92
94
98
Seal Barometric
Pressure
("Hg)
24.44
24.43
24.40
24.36
24.37
24.35
24.36
24.36
24.36
24.33
24.37
24.35
24.47
24.42
24.37
24.34
24.35
24.38
24.38
24.36
24.39
24.51
24.48
24.46
24.42
24.50
24.48
24.43
24.24
24.31
24.24
24.31
24.16
24.14
24.54
24.53
24.50
24.47
24.55
24.46
24.55
24.52
Measure PSHED HC
at 15 Minute Soak
(g/Qhr)
0.039
0.025
13.730
0.592
7.620
3.830
0.025
0.841
0.325
0.100
0.044
0.041
0.164
0.287
0.024
0.141
0.036
0.018
0.403
1.603
0.030
0.037
1.283
0.060
0.022
0.017
3.788
0.033
16.107
0.156
0.107
21.643
2.264
0.165
0.691
0.034
12.329
0.129
0.034
1.565
7.535
4.608
F-45
-------
Table F-3. Before-Repair and After-Repair PSHED Measurements for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to vehicle)
337
339
343
348.432
350
352
354
354
355
357
361
362
364
365
367
367
370
371
375
379
381
383
385
387
391
392
393
395
396
397
401
402
404
404
405
416
420
424
425
427
428
430
Year
2001
1994
1991
1990
2005
2001
1989
1989
1993
1997
1995
2001
1995
2002
1993
1993
2003
1996
2005
1993
1998
1994
2001
2000
1999
1999
2001
1997
2000
2005
1995
2004
1998
1998
1996
1999
1996
1970
1998
1984
1975
2002
Make
Nissan
Toyota
VW
Dodge
Subaru
Chevrolet
Jeep
Jeep
Toyota
Nissan
VW
Audi
Buick
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Land Rover
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Jeep
Chevrolet
Dodge
Jeep
Isuzu
Honda
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Ford
Lexus
Hyundai
Isuzu
Isuzu
Chevrolet
Mazda
Jeep
VW
Mitsubishi
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Model
Xterra
4Runner
Golf
Ram Charger
Outback
Astro
Cherokee
Cherokee
Corolla
Pathfinder
Golf
TT Quatro
Roadmaster
Mustang
Van 20 / G20
Van 20 / G20
Discovery
Corolla
Focus
Legacy
Cherokee
S-10
Dakota
Grand Cherokee
Rodeo
Accord
Solara
S-10
Mystique
Freestyle
SC300
Elantra
Rodeo
Rodeo
Cavalier
Protege
Grand Cherokee
Beetle
Eclipse
Land Cruiser
C-10
Wrangler
PSHED Measurement
Seal DateTime
11AUG09: 17: 16:00
12AUG09: 11:47:00
12AUG09:13:22:00
12AUG09:14:43:00
12AUG09: 16: 17:00
13AUG09:09:45:00
13AUG09:13:25:00
21 AUG09: 12:47:00
13AUG09: 11:37:00
21AUG09:15:52:00
14AUG09: 10:29:00
14AUG09: 12:02:00
14AUG09:13:51:00
14AUG09: 16:52:00
14AUG09:15:31:00
18AUG09: 15:33:00
17AUG09: 10:08:00
17AUG09:13:32:00
17AUG09:12:15:00
17AUG09:16:13:00
17AUG09:16:55:00
18AUG09:09:38:00
18AUG09: 11:27:00
18AUG09:13:03:00
19AUG09:11:53:00
19AUG09:14:31:00
19AUG09:15:33:00
20AUG09:09:49:00
19AUG09: 17:00:00
20 AUG09: 11:43:00
20AUG09:12:33:00
20AUG09:14:10:00
20 AUG09: 17:06:00
26AUG09:08:52:00
20 AUG09: 15:47:00
21 AUG09: 11:59:00
21AUG09:14:13:00
21 AUG09: 16:36:00
24AUG09:10:23:00
24AUG09:13:54:00
24AUG09: 15:24:00
24AUG09: 12:09:00
Timing
(PSHED is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
After
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Seal Temperature
(F)
94
91
93
91
93
84
90
85
91
87
80
81
82
82
85
75
72
78
77
79
77
73
82
78
83
86
85
73
85
80
82
83
85
71
84
81
86
88
84
85
81
85
Final Temperature
(F)
101
99
99
98
99
96
99
99
97
98
86
89
92
89
97
97
81
86
86
85
82
92
84
94
94
94
82
93
90
90
91
95
95
92
90
98
92
90
96
92
96
Seal Barometric
Pressure
("Hg)
24.46
24.48
24.45
24.43
24.40
24.42
24.40
24.52
24.40
24.45
24.34
24.33
24.30
24.28
24.27
24.30
24.48
24.46
24.47
24.44
24.45
24.40
24.37
24.35
24.27
24.27
24.26
24.49
24.26
24.48
24.48
24.47
24.44
24.51
24.43
24.52
24.49
24.45
24.38
24.38
24.41
24.38
Measure PSHED HC
at 15 Minute Soak
(g/Qhr)
0.066
2.236
0.963
0.567
0.022
0.565
133.986
0.224
2.216
2.323
0.171
0.127
1.209
0.024
14.561
5.826
0.015
0.087
0.052
0.068
0.050
2.161
0.022
0.018
0.080
0.046
0.464
0.718
0.038
0.027
0.349
0.015
11.063
0.046
0.040
0.015
2.260
1.935
0.008
26.900
7.751
0.073
F-46
-------
Table F-3. Before-Repair and After-Repair PSHED Measurements for Participating Vehicles (Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
(unique to vehicle)
431
437
438
439
454
460
466
468
469
475
481
482
486
489
494
497
498
504
507
512
517
521
527
540
542
546
547
550
559
563
568
Year
1993
1991
1975
1998
1988
2003
2003
2004
2000
2000
2003
1992
1993
1991
1995
1994
1998
1992
2001
2005
1999
1994
1995
1998
1986
1996
1975
1992
1989
1998
1997
Make
Mitsubishi
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Pontiac
BMW
Dodge
Acura
Subaru
Nissan
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Jeep
Ford
Mazda
Buick
Honda
Ford
Toyota
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Nissan
Eagle
Honda
Subaru
Geo
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobile
Ford
Saturn
Model
3000 GT
S-10
C-10
Grand Prix
M6
Durango
RSX
Outback
Pathfinder
Astro
Frontier
Stanza
Cherokee
Bronco
MX-6
Century
Accord
F150
Sequoia
Santa Fe
Lumina
Sentra
Talon
Accord
GL10
Prizm
Ranger F250
Taurus
Regency
Taurus
SL1
PSHED Measurement
Seal DateTime
24AUG09: 16:59:00
25 AUG09: 14:37:00
25 AUG09: 16:49:00
25AUG09:16:03:00
25 AUG09: 15:32:00
26AUG09:! 1:16:00
27AUG09:13:53:00
27 AUG09: 15:39:00
27 AUG09: 14:24:00
27 AUG09: 17:00:00
28AUG09:09:55:00
28AUG09:! 1:14:00
28AUG09:12:53:00
28AUG09: 14:46:00
28AUG09:16:13:00
3 1AUG09: 10:38:00
3 1AUG09: 11:40:00
3 1AUG09: 14:28:00
31AUG09:13:08:00
3 1AUG09: 16:52:00
01SEP09:10:23:00
31AUG09:15:58:00
01SEP09:11:55:00
01SEP09:14:58:00
01SEP09:17:28:00
02SEP09: 12: 10:00
02SEP09: 10:47:00
02SEP09:15:41:00
03SEP09:13:37:00
03SEP09: 16:21:00
04SEP09:11:53:00
Timing
(PSHED is
Before Repair
or
After Repair)
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Before
Seal Temperature
(F)
80
76
77
78
74
81
88
86
88
85
77
80
82
87
86
73
79
84
82
84
82
85
87
86
85
81
78
88
82
82
83
Final Temperature
(F)
86
78
84
84
85
92
93
94
94
96
87
89
93
97
94
82
86
94
93
89
89
91
93
91
91
87
89
95
92
90
89
Seal Barometric
Pressure
("Hg)
24.40
24.50
24.47
24.48
24.48
24.52
24.56
24.55
24.56
24.54
24.65
24.64
24.62
24.57
24.54
24.39
24.37
24.33
24.36
24.31
24.45
24.30
24.43
24.40
24.39
24.52
24.52
24.46
24.46
24.42
24.43
Measure PSHED HC
at 15 Minute Soak
(g/Qhr)
0.054
0.133
6.933
0.018
0.455
0.032
0.018
0.022
0.052
2.454
0.036
0.195
0.277
28.800
0.190
0.126
0.027
0.132
0.064
0.020
0.033
0.248
2.202
2.098
0.130
0.622
6.837
14.696
4.127
0.050
0.387
F-47
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
7
9
17
18
20
21
25
27
28
Year
1998
1992
1993
2003
1990
1991
2000
1992
1989
Make
Ford
Saturn
Mercury
VW
Nissan
Jeep
Audi
Jeep
Dodge
Model
Explorer
SL
Grand
Marquis
Passat
Pathfinder
Wrangler
A6
Wrangler
Raider
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.176
5.039
56.424
0.099
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
6/29/2009
6/29/2009
6/29/2009
6/29/2009
0.234 H6/30/2009
1.241
0.266
5.939
19.380
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
6/30/2009
6/30/2009
6/30/2009
6/30/2009
MCM
Time
10:03
11:40
14:15
16:13
8:34
10:09
12:41
14:24
16:12
£
X
o
-
•d
Visual (0;m;
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
^2
N
Fuel Lines
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
^2
N
S1
S.
•a
•<
vi
j3
3
x
O
3
NP
Sniffer ft
%
>
^2
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
%
J
N
Fuel Filter
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
NP
Sniffer ft
%
>
3
NP
S1
S.
1
•<
vi
j3
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
3
N
Fuel Injectors
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
3
N
Ground
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
3
N
Fill Pipe Joint
•<
vi
'o
3
x
O
3
0
Sniffer ft
%
>
3
N
§
r?
•<
vi
j3
3
x
O
3
NP
S3
^
?
3^
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;m;
x
O
3
S3
^
?
?i
>
§
Tank is located inside a metal shroud. Ran sniffer around shroud.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |m
Y |m
N
Sniffed at connections at fuel tank. Looks wet but sniff is negative. PCV disconnected. Sniff is positive. Minor rust on tank
straps.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
N
0
N
NP
NP
Straps rusty. Tank in good shape. Had one brief sniffer hit near left front engine. Unable to replicate. Vague fuelish odor
when hood open.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
N |o
N
0
Y
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
Only 3 of 6 injectors visible. Sniffer did not detect anything on either fuel rail.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
Canister purge line to air intake was a hit with sniffer. Air intake disconnected from filter at manifold. Fuel tank in metal
shroud.
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |NP |N |o
N
Engine with shroud. Could only poke sniffer around edges and back. Sniffed around fuel tanks and filter. I could get sniffer
into places I could not see.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
Y
0
Y 0
Y
NP
NP
Major leak appears to be fuel filler to tank. Sniffer went nuts a couple of times under vehicle in front of tank. Couldn't see
anything or reproduce. Weak gasoline odor below vehicle.
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
NP
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
Y 0
N
NP
NP
Tank metal shroud rusted and dented. Right side fuel rail visible - left side is not. Sniffer did not detect underhood HCs.
Mild gas odor when driving on dyno. The purge line is missing from the canister.
F-48
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
34
39
42
44
45
46
48
49
53
57
62
Year
1995
1994
1987
1989
1997
1990
1994
1994
1997
1996
2003
Make
Ford
Jeep
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mazda
Pontiac
Ford
Toyota
Model
Ranger
Grand
Cherokee
Power Ram
Caprice
F150
Taurus
Camaro
929
Grand Am
Explorer
XLT
Tundra
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
2.996
0.194
24.117
14.015
0.043
3.058
6.667
15.588
0.258
0.033
0.011
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
7/1/2009
7/2/2009
7/6/2009
7/6/2009
7/6/2009
7/6/2009
7/6/2009
7/7/2009
7/7/2009
7/7/2009
7/7/2009
MCM
Time
11:59
8:19
11:15
14:53
13:33
15:27
16:26
10:20
8:21
10:58
16:28
O
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
^
Y
Fuel FUter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
FuelRaU
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
>
§
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
-
Visual (0;
3
p
3
m
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
Can smell gasoline with hood open. Huge leak in fuel rail/ injector/intake air. No visible leakage. Tank has stains but might
be heavier oil.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
Nothing suspicious. Engine has vague oily smell.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Dripping oil. Some wetness on outside of tank Did not affect sniffer. Grease? Vehicle appears to be carbureted. Left suction
on TP due to extraordinarily high CO and HC emissions on IM240 test. Occasional whiff of gasoline odor walking around
vehicle.
0
Y
0
Y
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Y
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Y |m
Y 0
Y
Anytime sniffer approached top of fuel tank it lit up. No damage visible to tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
o |N |NP |N |NP
NP
NP
NP
Only right bank visible. No leaks. Left bank not visible but there is a leak at rear of left fuel rail. Tank well hidden.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |m
N
NP
NP
Minor rust at connection to fuel filler near top rear of fuel tank. Check engine light on.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
Fuel lines under hood to pressure regulator and to throttle body. All OK.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
F-49
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
64
68
69
75.096
77
79
82
85
91
92
93
Year
1976
2001
2002
1986
1987
1988
1993
1996
1977
1997
2003
Make
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Land Rover
Toyota
Saab
Chevrolet
Cadillac
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Model
Omega
Wrangler
Freelander
MR2
900 Turbo
1500 Pickup
El Dorado
Ram 1500
Blazer
F150
Durango
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
15.649
0.087
0.054
0.249
3.906
18.250
0.473
6.077
15.176
0.022
0.051
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
7/8/2009
7/9/2009
7/8/2009
7/9/2009
7/9/2009
7/10/2009
7/10/2009
7/16/2009
7/15/2009
7/14/2009
7/14/2009
MCM
Time
12:15
9:52
16:35
14:36
16:26
12:26
14:45
11:23
9:45
10:09
12:23
O
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
^
NP
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
>
§
N
1 I
a #
•g
l:
a
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
§3 <
s %
? e.
"^ 'S
% 3
^ p
3
N 0
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
Vehicle is carbureted. Sniffer lit up anytime I approached the base of the carb from any direction. Gasoline odor under hood.
Intake manifold looks rusty. Carb dirty on exterior.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Saddle tank. One side may have lost shrouding. Some rust visible. Nothing extreme
0
N
0
N
0
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Y
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Rear engine vehicle running rich. Has exhaust leaks as well. Sniffer was inconsistent on finding leaks. I think that what
sniffer was picking up was exhaust. PCV hose wet. Lots of rust on vehicle on bottom.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
Tank looks greasy and there was grease burning off of exhaust system during IM240s. Engine is amazingly clean for
mileage on vehicle.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |m |N |o
Canister purge disconnect is source of under hood HC emissions.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
N
NP
NP
o |N
Engine and underbody heavily shrouded.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |m
N
NP
NP
Tank looks stained possibly from gasoline. I can smell gasoline when lying under vehicle by filler neck. The vent line clamp
is rusted and looks like it has been wet but sniffer is inconsistent about sensing fumes in that area.
0
Y
0
N
0
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
Y 0
N
NP
NP
Connection from fuel filler to top of tank not visible. All of top of gas tank was hot spot for sniffer. Mechanically vehicle
looks well cared for.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
Some rust on clamps on fuel filler and evap lines.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
F-50
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
95
100
103.122
108
109
110
112
120
121
127
130
Year
1998
1984
1988
1995
1995
2005
1986
1989
1994
1993
1995
Make
Nissan
Chevrolet
Toyota
Cadillac
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Chevrolet
Isuzu
Jeep
Ford
Model
Quest
Suburban
Camry
SLS
Avalon
Avalon
LTD
Camaro
Amigo
Cherokee
Explorer
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.451
10.130
5.011
22.449
2.352
0.038
9.116
20.322
0.115
26.376
0.049
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
MCM
Date
7/15/2009
7/15/2009
7/16/2009
7/16/2009
7/20/2009
7/16/2009
7/16/2009
7/17/2009
7/17/2009
7/17/2009
7/20/2009
MCM
Time
8:26
11:00
9:51
13:10
14:22
15:27
14:30
11:04
11:37
16:20
10:23
O
as
VI
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
m
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
Y
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
Smaller lines near fuel tank - looked like a bit of wetness. Main fuel filler line is ok. Only front bank of injectors and front
rail available for testing. Sniffer hot spot around PCV hose connections to air intake.
0
N
0
N
0
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
Y
o
N
NP
NP
Cannot see fuel filler connection at top of tank but sniffer went nuts. Also smaller leak around PCV connection to right valve
cover. Base of carburetor looked damp but sniffer did not detect anything.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
Gas cap "clicking" felt very weak. Fuel filter wet with oil. Sniffer negative.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
s
Y
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
o |N
o |N
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
There are two holes in metal line fuel supply to engine. Gasoline squirts out in fine streams. Puddles of gasoline in engine
compartment. Did not reach ground.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N
o
N
NP
NP
Unable to access injectors due to shrouding. Moist looking tank but did not look like gasoline. Looked more like grease and
did not set off sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N
Engine shrouded. Unable to see fuel rail or injectors. Sniffer could not get that close either.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
Evap canister under hood? If so there are no lines connected to it. Lots of oil on engine. Was smoking off engine during
IM240. Lots of oil on ground.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
o
N
NP
NP
Vehicle too low to see fuel lines. Same is true for most of gas tank. Canister is leaking or full. That is where sniffer found
HCs.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N
Vague odor of gas when exiting vehicle after IM240. Did not detect anything with sniffer.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
Tank shroud has sizable dent in it. Evap canister set sniffer off anywhere around it.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
Some rust on fiiel filler neck lines but no leaks.
o |N
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
F-51
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
131
134
135
138
139
156
157
158
159
161
163
Year
1997
2003
2001
2002
2002
1999
1982
2005
1990
2001
2002
Make
Subaru
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Suzuki
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mazda
Saturn
Volvo
Model
Outback
Impala
Sebring
Vitara
Sunfire
Explorer
F150
Explorer
Cobalt
MX-6
SC-1
S60
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.100
0.024
0.047
0.020
0.027
0.015
5.074
0.015
0.728
<^
0.052
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
7/20/2009
7/20/2009
7/21/2009
7/21/2009
7/20/2009
7/22/2009
7/22/2009
7/22/2009
7/23/2009
7/23/2009
7/23/2009
MCM
Time
11:30
13:04
9:48
8:28
16:18
10:30
13:16
11:59
8:29
10:07
12:40
O
»
X
p
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
Under body fuel lines not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
Engine shrouded and injectors not visible. Could reach sniffer toward fill pipe to tank junction but could not see the
connection. The car has been repainted.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Only front fuel rail and injectors are visible. Sniffed in area of rear bank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Unable to sniff injectors as there is no access. There is blue paint where filler goes into tank and it looks a lot cleaner than
rest of car. Some rust on metal parts of fuel filler pipes.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Unable to see injectors. Sniff in their vicinity.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
Filler neck of rear tank under vehicle looked wet. Metal fiiel lines are rusting. Area around PCV is wet and set sniffer off.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Engine shrouded injectors. Not visible along with a lot of the fiiel rail.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Some rust on clamps holding connections to full filler neck to tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Fuel pipe (rubber) connector from filler next to tank looks new.
o |N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
Under body fuel lines only partially visible. Could not see junction from filler to tank but could reach sniffer in that area
F-52
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
168
177
178
184
185
186
188
189
190
192
193
Year
1994
2004
1969
1998
2002
1995
2005
1993
2001
1991
2003
Make
Saturn
Dodge
VW
vw
Toyota
Ford
Lexus
GMC
Ford
Infmiti
Ford
Model
SL2
Ram 1500
CP-
Dunebuggy
Jetta
Echo
F150
GX-470
Safari
Expedition
Q45
Focus
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
25.565
0.034
1.975
0.137
0.018
0.145
0.015
0.282
0.045
0.043
0.053
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
MCM
Date
7/23/2009
7/24/2009
7/24/2009
7/27/2009
7/27/2009
7/27/2009
7/27/2009
7/27/2009
7/28/2009
7/27/2009
7/28/2009
MCM
Time
14:09
15:30
11:50
8:42
9:50
10:56
12:07
13:39
9:39
14:59
8:19
O
as
X
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
Whole engine bay reaks of gasoline. Could not identify point source there. Evap canister hidden under right front fender.
Could not see but could stick sniffer in there. Suspect that is source of fumes.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
Y
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Y
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
Fuel cap feeds directly into tank. Suspect lines around fuel filter are defective. Tank not visible inside "trunk" in front of
vehicle which does not open. This is basically a kit car. Exhaust output is elevated above normal.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |NP |NP |o
N
NP
NP
Could only see end of fuel rail and not injectors. Could not see fill pipe to tank junction.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP |NP
NP
o |N
Could reach in and sniff fuel rail but could not really see. Injectors not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Could only see injector. Rest hidden from view.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Engine completely shrouded. Got sniffer inside a few places but fuel rail injectors not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Most of engine is accessible through cowling inside van. Did not want to open due to messy condition of vehicle. What I
could probe on engine was negative for sniffer. One hot spot was near frame rail below passenger seat. Might have been
exhaust leak.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
NP |NP
NP
NP
NP
Fuel filler and gas tank hidden somewhere. Disconnect (open) line at canister but did not see anything to connect it to
(purge?). Vehicle has been bashed around and neglected. Dents on bottom of spare tire well (is that where tank is?).
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
F-53
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
194
197
203.205
212
213
214
217
218
219
220
221
Year
1994
2000
1991
1977
1979
2000
1994
1990
1991
1994
1994
Make
Geo
Honda
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
VW
Lexus
Toyota
Ford
Model
Prizm
Accord
Wrangler
Econoline
D-150
S-10
Ranger
Cabriolet
LS400
Tacoma
Bronco
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.039
0.025
13.730
7.620
3.830
0.025
0.841
0.325
0.100
0.044
0.041
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
7/28/2009
7/28/2009
7/28/2009
7/28/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
7/29/2009
MCM
Time
10:28
11:55
13:30
15:48
8:23
9:17
12:25
9:50
13:50
14:50
11:27
O
»
X
p
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
o |N
Underbody fuel lines not visible inside of covers.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
G
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Y
. G
Y
NP
NP
Also load line (I think) to canister or canister itself set off sniffer. May be fuel return line to tank. Gasoline drips stop when
vehicle is off.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Full filler pipe looks dented. Rust present and dents in tank. Engine is mostly inside van under cowling. Sniffer found a hot
spot on left side of engine ~8 inches left of carburetor. Vague smell of gasoline in engine bay.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Y
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Exhaust manifold leaks and vehicle is running very rich. Hard to tell if fuel filter area is leaking or I am just seeing exhaust
fumes. Same is true under right front of vehicle.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Fill pipe goes into top of tank. Unable to see but could stick sniffer in there.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
N
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Unable to see injectors. Roads were wet so am discounting moisture seen around fuel filler neck which was exposed to
splash. Same is true for moisture in engine. Neither set sniffer off.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
NP
NP |NP
NP
NP
NP
Everything is pretty much hidden away; fuel filler pipe; gas tank; under hood fuel system; fuel lines; injectors; and canister.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Could sniff in area of injectors but could not see them.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Unable to see injectors or right fuel rail. Some rust on fiiel fill pipe.
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
F-54
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
232
238
246
249
252
255
261
262
263
266
271
278
Year
1992
1993
2003
1997
2002
2004
1994
1984
1997
2002
1997
2002
Make
Ford
Jeep
Chevrolet
BMW
Toyota
Lexus
GMC
Nissan
Honda
Chevrolet
GMC
Dodge
Model
Explorer
Wrangler
Suburban
328i
Tacoma
RX330
Suburban
720
Accord
Tahoe
Sierra
Dakota
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.164
0.287
0.024
0.141
0.036
0.018
0.403
1.603
0.030
0.037
1.283
0.060
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
MCM
Date
7/30/2009
7/30/2009
7/31/2009
7/31/2009
7/31/2009
7/31/2009
8/3/2009
8/3/2009
8/3/2009
8/12/2009
8/3/2009
8/4/2009
MCM
Time
12:43
16:20
9:30
12:33
15:37
16:15
11:50
13:05
10:45
8:43
15:48
10:25
O
as
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Pump
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
^
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Canister under hood set sniffer off. Vague gasoline smell in that area.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
Sniffer (I
>
!
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
g3
%
1
N
o |N
0
N
as
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
o
N
NP
NP
While crawling under vehicle there is gasoline odor. There is gasoline smell around vehicle. The fuel rail does not look
OEM but no leaks found. Could not find fiiel filter.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N
0
N
Engine shrouded. Difficult to see or sniff components. A lot of underbody fuel lines are also hidden.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
Left fuel rail and injectors not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N
Everything under hood (fuel lines rail injectors etc) all hidden under shroud.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
o |N
TB injection no fuel rail or injectors.
0
Y
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N
Despite gas cap pass sniffer found HC's around cap and nowhere else.
0
N
o |N
NP
NP
0
N
o |N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
o |N |NP |N
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
N
NP
NP
o
Y
NP
NP
Cannot see filler to tank connection. Fuel tank skid plate has some damage. Around top of tank on fill pipe side (right) the
sniffer went off particularly near the front of tank.
0
N
o |N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N
Greasy almost tar like substance just below filler neck on fill tube. K&N air intake but no fiiel mods.
o
N
NP
NP
F-55
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
285
290
294
295
301
302
305
306
309
311
Year
1998
2005
1985
1999
1981
1989
1997
1967
2001
2002
Make
Honda
Acura
Ford
Mazda
GMC
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Nissan
VW
Model
CRV
TSX
F150
626
Sierra
K1500
Pickup
Ram 1500
Chevelle
Sentra
Passat
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.022
0.017
3.788
0.033
16.107
0.156
0.107
21.643
2.264
0.165
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/4/2009
8/5/2009
8/5/2009
8/5/2009
8/7/2009
8/6/2009
8/7/2009
8/6/2009
8/7/2009
8/7/2009
MCM
Time
14:45
11:33
13:55
15:30
8:30
13:55
9:59
15:51
13:55
15:10
O
»
X
p
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
O
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
New Jersey vehicle. Lots of rust on fuel fill pipe especially clamps on hoses connecting to fuel tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Injectors not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |NP |N |o
N
NP
NP
Could not see fill pipe to tank connection. When engine is off there is a strong smell of gasoline at right front of engine. The
sniffer identified canister as source. Did not detect with engine running as there was too much air movement from fan.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
Tank has minor scrapes and dings. PCV valve is mounted in valve cover without gasket - lots of vapor is escaping. Also carb
looks new or recently rebuilt and may have leaks - no liquid seen.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
See photos. Some moisture near first connection after fuel rail inlet. Fuel pipe goes into tank through grommet which looks
dry but rubber is rotting.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Fill pipe to rubber connector looked skewed as if someone had not fully aligned pieces before tightening clamp. Looked
dry.
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Y
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Connection at tank badly rusted. Vehicle runs rich and has exhaust leaks especially at manifold. Sniffer was going off almost
continuously due to exhaust fumes.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
Y
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Ground under vehicle below canister. Canister is behind left rear tire and vent is source of gasoline odor and sets sniffer off.
Owner left premises to fill gas tank between emissions test and the MCM sniff test.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
NP
NP |o
N
NP
NP
Everything under hood is shrouded. Fuel pipe to tank connections are mostly hidden as well as connection to tank. What
was visible appeared to be in good shape.
F-56
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
316
320
321
325
327
329
331
162.332
337
339
343
Year
2003
2004
1997
2000
1981
1969
1994
1995
2001
1994
1991
Make
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
Jeep
Chevrolet
Jeep
Nissan
Toyota
VW
Model
Accent
Cavalier
S-10
Prizm
320i
Commando
Blazer
Wrangler
Xterra
4Runner
Golf
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.691
0.034
12.329
0.034
1.565
7.535
4.608
0.166
0.066
2.236
0.963
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/10/2009
8/10/2009
8/10/2009
8/11/2009
8/10/2009
8/11/2009
8/11/2009
8/11/2009
8/11/2009
8/12/2009
8/12/2009
MCM
Time
8:32
10:07
11:32
8:42
16:25
10:08
11:40
13:26
16:25
10:48
12:21
O
»
X
p
•d
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
I
•a
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
3
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
NP
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
§
5
Y
-
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
0
S3
^
?
—V
H
>
1
Y
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
&
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
§
NP
Something seems to be damaged or leaking at top of fuel tank. Sniffer active many places around top pipe to tank joint.
Looks dry - tank appears to have evaporated fluid of some kind but that did not activate sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Injectors not accessible for visual check or sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
G
Y
NP
NP
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Major gasoline leak with gas puddling on engine. Not sure where leak is exactly. Some part of supply or injector to TBI
system?
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
Fuel rail and injectors hidden under shroud.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
Y
NP
NP
Area around tank - up high where I can't see set sniffer off in multiple locations. Suspect something wrong with plumbing at
top of tank.
0
Y
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
0
N
Non-OEM tank looks patched. Vented fuel cap. Carburetor seems to have leak around bowl seal area and perhaps around
base. No liquid seen. Gas cap appears to have had gasket modified.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
Left front engine compartment reeks of gasoline. Suspect fault with evap canister.
0
N
0
N |NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Metal shroud around tank a little banged up. No leaks detected from tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
N |o
N
NP
NP
Only right fuel rail and injectors visible. Could not see actual fill pipe to tank junction.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N |NP |N |o
Right side fuel rail and injectors not visible. Could not see fill pipe to tank junction.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
Y 0
N
NP
NP
Cannot see filler pipe to tank connection. There is a leak of some sort at top of fuel tank. Sniffer goes off when reaching
above tank on right and right-front of tank. Fill door is on right.
F-57
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
348.432
350
352
354
355
357
361
362
364
365
Year
1990
2005
2001
1989
1993
1997
1995
2001
1995
2002
Make
Dodge
Subaru
Chevrolet
Jeep
Toyota
Nissan
VW
Audi
Buick
Ford
Model
Ram
Charger
Outback
Astro
Cherokee
Corolla
Pathfinder
Golf
TT Quatro
Roadmaster
Mustang
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.567
0.022
0.565
133.986
2.216
2.323
0.171
0.127
1.209
0.024
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/12/2009
8/12/2009
8/13/2009
8/13/2009
8/13/2009
8/21/2009
8/14/2009
8/14/2009
8/14/2009
8/14/2009
MCM
Time
13:52
15:20
8:42
12:13
10:35
14:50
9:30
11:30
12:50
16:00
O
S3
VI
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
I
•a
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
NP
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;m;
Ul
O
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
'§
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
'§
N
-
&
Visual (0;m;
X
O
3
0
S3
^
?
-V
.N
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
1
NP
Vehicle has exhaust leak at right manifold. This would allow untreated exhaust plume to be mixed with after cat plume from
tailpipe. Vehicle failed for emissions.
o |N
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |NP |N |o
N
NP
NP
Flat 4 engine. Fuel distribution is buried below intake runners. Fuel lines hidden in underbody shrouding. Could not see fill
pipe to tank connection. Could only reach with sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Van with engine mostly under cover between front seats. Most engine related fiiel system components not visible. Weak
odor of gasoline while situated below fiiel tank. Nothing visual or detected by sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
Y
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Injector #4 may be leaking. Sniffer thought so. Evap canister is ripe and set sniffer off once one got within a couple of inches
of it. Vehicle also leaks oil onto hot exhaust pipe and that smokes.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N |o
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Sniffer goes off when exposed to areas around top of tank. Tank looks like it might be newer than car (shiny metal). Could
smell gasoline when under car around tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
There is some sort of contraption that sets sniffer off back between fiiel tank and canister (see photo).
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |NP |NP |o
N
NP
NP
Could not see fiiel pipe to tank junction nor guess exactly where it was. Area was clean according to sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |NP
NP
NP
NP
Could not see filler to fill pipe connection. Fuel pressure regulator area set of sniffer but inconsistently.
m
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Fuel fill at rear behind license plate. Some staining on filler pipes. Canister set sniffer off as well.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
F-58
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
367
370
371
375
379
381
383
385
387
391
392
Year
1993
2003
1996
2005
1993
1998
1994
2001
2000
1999
1999
Make
Chevrolet
Land Rover
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Jeep
Chevrolet
Dodge
Jeep
Isuzu
Honda
Model
Van 20 /
G20
Discovery
Corolla
Focus
Legacy
Cherokee
S-10
Dakota
Grand
Cherokee
Rodeo
Accord
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
14.561
0.015
0.087
0.052
0.068
0.050
2.161
0.022
0.018
0.080
0.046
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/14/2009
8/17/2009
8/17/2009
8/17/2009
8/17/2009
8/17/2009
8/18/2009
8/18/2009
8/18/2009
8/19/2009
8/19/2009
MCM
Time
14:26
9:05
12:46
11:24
15:05
16:00
8:31
10:25
11:58
10:45
13:07
O
S3
VI
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
I
•a
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
NP
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
NP
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;m;
&
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;m;
Ul
O
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
'§
N
-
&
Visual (0;m;
X
O
3
0
S3
^
?
-V
.N
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
1
NP
Fuel filler and tank had light staining. No damage other than some rust. Same for tank. Engine is mostly under cowling
inside of van and inaccessible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Injectors hidden below intake manifold.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Vehicle has major exhaust leak on right bank. There is at least one bolt missing from exhaust flange. Exhaust (raw) is
enough to excite sniffer. Possibly some other minor leak such as cold start valve on manifold area.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Did not find fiiel filter.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |m
N
0
N
Carburetted? Tank has non-standard looking screw in place of drain bolt. Canister vent line disconnected at fill pipe (see
photos). In evening when vehicle was parked there was gas odor on left rear of vehicle. Canister?
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP |o
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
N
0
N
NP
NP
Could not see fuel fill pipe to tank connection but could reach sniffer to that location.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Fuel lines inside shroud but sniffer would have detected leak. Under hood fuel rail and injectors hidden from view and
sniffer.
F-59
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
393
395
396
397
401
402
404
405
416
420
Year
2001
1997
2000
2005
1995
2004
1998
1996
1999
1996
Make
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Ford
Lexus
Hyundai
Isuzu
Chevrolet
Mazda
Jeep
Model
Solara
S-10
Mystique
Freestyle
SC300
Elantra
Rodeo
Cavalier
Protege
Grand
Cherokee
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.464
0.718
0.038
0.027
0.349
0.015
11.063
0.040
0.015
2.260
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/19/2009
8/20/2009
8/19/2009
8/20/2009
8/20/2009
8/20/2009
8/20/2009
8/20/2009
8/21/2009
8/21/2009
MCM
Time
13:49
8:30
15:59
10:35
11:24
13:16
16:14
14:42
11:04
13:17
O
S3
VI
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
I
•a
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
Fuel Filter
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Fuel Rail
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
>,
§
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (Y;N
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;m;
Ul
O
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
1
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (Y;N
'§
N
-
&
Visual (0;m;
X
O
3
0
S3
^
?
-V
.N
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;m;
X
9
3
NP
S3
^
?
35
>
1
NP
Underbody-fiiel lines not visible but accessible to sniffer. Fuel injectors pretty much hidden below intake manifold.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
Y
NP
NP
Tank is severely dented. Cannot see liquid fiiel but top of fuel tank activates sniffer. Can hear fuel pump whining while
driving.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |NP |N |o
N
NP
NP
Massive intake manifold hides almost all of fuel rail and all injectors. Did not locate fuel filter. Could not see fill pipe to tank
junction but it was accessible to sniffer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N |NP |NP |o
N
NP
NP
Could not see or be certain that sniffer reached fuel pipe to tank connection. Back of engine (transverse V6) not accessible to
sniff fiiel rail or injectors.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
NP
NP |o
N
NP
NP
Limited visibility and access to fuel rail and in particular injectors. Could not see fill pipe to tank junction nor most of fill
pipe.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Only one fuel injector visible. Others hidden from view and sniffer. Could not find fuel filter.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Could not see underbody fuel lines but access was vented so sniffer should have picked up a leak. Did not find fuel filter.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
m
Y
NP
NP
Staining on outside of fuel tank. Fill pipe to tank connections (see photo) look good but sniffer went off when exposed to top
of fuel tank. Could not find evap canister (not where diagram indicates). Missing? Purge valve present.
F-60
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
424
425
427
428
430
431
437
438
439
454
460
466
Year
1970
1998
1984
1975
2002
1993
1991
1975
1998
1988
2003
2003
Make
VW
Mitsubishi
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Mitsubishi
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Pontiac
BMW
Dodge
Acura
Model
Beetle
Eclipse
Land
Cruiser
C-10
Wrangler
3000 GT
S-10
C-10
Grand Prix
M6
Durango
RSX
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
1.935
0.008
26.900
7.751
0.073
0.054
0.133
6.933
0.018
0.455
0.032
0.018
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
N/A
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/21/2009
8/24/2009
8/24/2009
8/24/2009
8/24/2009
8/24/2009
8/25/2009
8/25/2009
8/25/2009
8/25/2009
8/26/2009
8/27/2009
MCM
Time
16:00
9:14
12:40
14:20
11:06
15:58
13:28
17:10
16:28
15:57
10:24
12:36
O
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
^
N
Fuel FUter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
FuelRaU
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
>
§
NP
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
s
Sniffer (I
%
1
Y
-
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
Fuel connections to tank are some strange fibrous material that is saturated with gasoline. Some evidence of gasoline below
fuel filler connection at tank.
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Underbody fuel lines not visible. Could not find fuel filter. Replacement hood? No VECI labels.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
Exhaust leaks around catalytic converter and air injection system under hood.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Did not locate fuel filter. Left side exhaust manifold to tailpipe is leaking.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Did not see fuel filter.
0
N
NP
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Could not find fiiel filter. Underbody fuel lines hidden from view. Rear fuel rail and
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
injectors not visible. Transverse V6.
NP |NP
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Vague odor of gasoline around driver side engine compartment. Cannot find anything with sniffer.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
Right tank set off sniffer around top of tank on outboard side. Left fuel cap looks damaged but seems tight. Some evidence
of fuel having been spilled below left fuel cap. Right fuel cap different and newer.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N \0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Transverse V6. Rear fuel rail and injectors not accessible. Limited access to front.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
Did not locate fuel filter. Left side exhaust manifold to tailpipe is leaking.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N |o
N
o |N
Did not locate fuel filter. Most of fuel rail and injectors hidden from view.
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
F-61
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
468
469
475
481
482
486
489
494
497
498
504
Year
2004
2000
2000
2003
1992
1993
1991
1995
1994
1998
1992
Make
Subaru
Nissan
Chevrolet
Nissan
Nissan
Jeep
Ford
Mazda
Buick
Honda
Ford
Model
Outback
Pathfinder
Astro
Frontier
Stanza
Cherokee
Bronco
MX-6
Century
Accord
F150
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.022
0.052
2.454
0.036
0.195
0.277
28.800
0.190
0.126
0.027
0.132
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/27/2009
8/27/2009
8/27/2009
8/28/2009
8/28/2009
8/28/2009
8/28/2009
8/28/2009
8/31/2009
8/31/2009
8/31/2009
MCM
Time
14:30
13:31
16:00
9:02
10:21
11:43
13:28
15:19
9:38
10:35
13:24
O
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Pump
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
^
N
Fuel FUter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
FuelRaU
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
>
§
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
-
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
Could not see fuel pipe to tank connection. Did not locate fuel filter. Injectors buried (flat 4 engine). Could sniff in area of
fuel rails but could not see them.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Fuel injectors hidden below intake manifold.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
Y 0
N
NP
NP
Suspect that fiiel pump replacement damaged gasket. Areas on top of tank and near tank to fill pipe connect set sniffer off.
Also evap canister set sniffer off. No access to engine and that part of fuel system.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
o |N
Fuel injectors buried under intake manifold.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
0
N
0
Y
0
Y
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Sniffer went off in a variety of areas associated with fuel delivery. Sometimes injector sometimes rail sometimes fuel
pressure regulator. Could not pinpoint exact source of fumes.
0
N \0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N |NP |NP |o
N
NP
NP
Did not locate fuel filter. Could not be sure that sniffer reached fill pipe to tank connection. Could not see connection.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP |NP
NP
0
Y
0
N |o
Y
NP
NP
Fuel rail injectors below custom intake manifold. Sniffer went off near fuel pressure regulator but there are a lot of exhaust
leaks. This is what set sniffer off below vehicle. Sniffer went off when exposed to top area of fuel tank.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
Could not locate fuel filter.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N |m
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
Y 0
N
0
N
o |N
No non-OEM installations.
0
Y
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
o |N
302 V-8. Passenger side injectors inaccessible. No non-OEM installations.
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
F-62
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
507
512
517
521
527
540
542
546
547
550
559
Year
2001
2005
1999
1994
1995
1998
1986
1996
1975
1992
1989
Make
Toyota
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Nissan
Eagle
Honda
Subaru
Geo
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobile
Model
Sequoia
Santa Fe
Lumina
Sentra
Talon
Accord
GL10
Prizm
Ranger
F250
Taurus
Regency
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.064
0.020
0.033
0.248
2.202
2.098
0.13
0.622
6.837
14.696
4.127
IMGas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
8/31/2009
8/31/2009
9/1/2009
8/31/2009
9/1/2009
9/1/2009
9/1/2009
9/2/2009
9/2/2009
9/2/2009
9/3/2009
MCM
Time
11:52
15:48
9:22
15:05
10:35
14:05
16:35
11:19
9:45
14:43
12:45
O
P
•d
Visual (0;m;
P
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Lines
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Pump
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
Sniffer (I
%
1
NP
Fuel Pump
to Metering
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
^
N
Fuel FUter
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
FuelRaU
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Fuel Injectors
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
Ground
Visual (0;
3
p
3
0
Sniffer (I
>
!
N
FUI Pipe Joint
Visual (0;
3
X
9
3
0
Sniffer (I
%
1
N
-
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
—V
>
1
N
nonOEM
Visual (0;
3
p
3
NP
1
>
$
NP
Tank covered in metal shield. No evidence of damage/rust. No non-OEM installations.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
No non-OEM installations.
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Underbody fuel lines inaccessible. Low ground clearance. No non-OEM equipment.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
Y
0
N
o |N
0
Y 0
Y
Did not find fuel filter. Sniffer detected leak at pressure regulator. Sniffer leaks detected where fuel lines exit tank. Exhaust
manifold leaks.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Sniffer leak detected at vapor canister. No non-OEM installations. Did not find fiiel filter. Canister leak = vapor not liquid.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP |NP
o |N |o
N
NP
NP
No non-OEM installations.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
While lying below fuel tank area I thought I got a faint whiff of gasoline. Bruce said same as we were closing PSHED door.
m
Y
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
Fuel cap leaks when gasoline sloshes in tank. Fuel comes out of gas cap (when) tank is full.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
Y
0
N
0
N
o |N
o |N |o
Y
NP
NP
Sniffer went off around fuel tank area. But fuel filter is also right next to tank. Could not see or feel liquid from fuel filter.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
Y
0
N |o
N
NP
NP
Did not locate fuel filter. Most fuel injectors not visible - below intake. Ground under vehicle set off sniffer and left front of
vehicle. This is where the charcoal canister is located. There was a hole in the bottom of canister as if some sort of plug was
missing.
F-63
-------
Table F-4. Before-Repair PSHED, IM Gas Cap, and Modified California Method Results for Participating Vehicles
(Continued)
Combined
Packet ID
unique to
vehicle)
563
568
Year
1998
1997
Make
Ford
Saturn
Model
Taurus
SL1
Measured
PSHED
(g/Qhr)
0.050
0.387
IM Gas
Cap
Inspection
Result
Pass
Pass
MCM
Date
9/3/2009
9/4/2009
MCM
Time
15:30
11:08
O
VI
p
•d
Visual (0;
=
05
O
Z
3
0
Sniffer (Y
%
%
\3
N
1
r;
Visual (0;
=
05
O
Z
3
0
Sniffer (Y
%
>
\3
N
1
•d
Visual (0;
=
05
O
Z
3
NP
Sniffer (Y
%
%
\3
NP
§ i.
Visual (0;
=
05
O
Z
3
0
Sniffer (Y
%
>
^5
N
1
i
"!
Visual (0;
=
x
O
2
3
0
Sniffer (Y
%
%
\3
N
1
i
Visual (0;
=
05
O
2
3
0
Shififer (Y
%
>
\3
N
1
5*
5?'
s
Visual (0;
=
05
O
2
3
NP
£«?#«• (Y
%
%
\3
N
O
3
1
Visual (0;
=
X
O
2
3
0
£«?#«• (Y
%
%
\3
N
E
a
•g
I1
5
Visual (0;
3
X
O
Z
3
0
£«?#«• (Y
%
%
\3
N
-
Visual (0;
=
x
O
Z
0
-V
%
%
\3
N
§
1
Visual (0;
=
05
O
Z
NP
1
%
%
\3
NP
Transverse V6. Rear injectors not accessible. Part of fuel rail not visible.
0
N
0
N
NP
NP
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
o |N
0
N |o
Y
NP
NP
Sniffer goes off inconsistently in area of fuel tank especially around top. Odor of gasoline under vehicle in fuel tank area.
F-64
------- |