Using MOVES2014 in Project-Level
    Carbon Monoxide Analyses
United States
Environments!
Agency

-------
     Using MOVES2014 in Project-Level
            Carbon Monoxide Analyses
                   Transportation and Climate Division
                  Office of Transportation and Air Quality
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
United States
Environ marital Prelection
Agency
EPA-420-B-15-028
March 2015

-------
                                 Table of Contents

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION	1

   1.1  PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDANCE	 1
   1.2  TYPES OF PROJECT-LEVEL CO ANALYSES	 3
   1.3  CONTACTS	4
   1.4  GUIDANCE AND EXISTING REQUIREMENTS	4

SECTION 2: ESTIMATING PROJECT-LEVEL CO EMISSIONS USING MOVES	5

   2.1  CHARACTERIZING A PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS	6
   2.2  DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS	11
   2.3  DETERMINING BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS	13
   2.4  ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING THE PROJECT DATA MANAGER	18
   2.5  GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING	27

SECTION 3: EXAMPLE: USING MOVES FOR A CO SCREENING ANALYSIS OF AN
INTERSECTION	29

   3.1  CHARACTERIZING THE PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS (SECTION 2.1)	29
   3.2  DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS (SECTION 2.2)	30
   3.3  DETERMINE BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS (SECTION 2.3)	30
   3.4  ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING PROJECT DATA MANAGER (SECTION 2.4)	31
   3.5  GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING (SECTION 2.5)	36

SECTION 4: EXAMPLE: USING MOVES TO CALCULATE START AND IDLE EMISSION
FACTORS FOR A TRANSIT FACILITY	37

   4.1  CHARACTERIZING THE PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS (SECTION 2.1)	37
   4.2  DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS (SECTION 2.2)	38
   4.3  DETERMINE BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS (SECTION 2.3)	38
   4.4  ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING PROJECT DATA MANAGER (SECTION 2.4)	39
   4.5  GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING (SECTION 2.5)	44

APPENDIX A: CHARACTERIZING INTERSECTION PROJECTS FOR CO REFINED
ANALYSES USING MOVES	45
   A.I  INTRODUCTION	45
   A.2  OPTION 1: USING AVERAGE SPEEDS	46
   A.3  OPTION 2: USING LINK DRIVE SCHEDULES	47
   A.4  OPTION 3: USING OP-MODE DISTRIBUTIONS	49

-------
                                   List of Figures

FIGURE 1. STEPS FOR USING MOVES IN PROJECT-LEVEL CO ANALYSES	5
FIGURE 2. DIAGRAM OF SUGGESTED LINKS FOR A SIMPLE INTERSECTION	7
FIGURE 3. LINKS CHARACTERIZING THE PROPOSED INTERSECTION	30
FIGURE 4. METEOROLOGY INPUT (AVERAGE JANUARY CONDITIONS) - INTERSECTION	31
FIGURES. FLEET AGE DISTRIBUTION (PARTIAL)-INTERSECTION	32
FIGURE 6. FUEL SUPPLY TABLE - INTERSECTION	33
FIGURE?. FUEL FORMULATION TABLE-INTERSECTION	33
FIGURES. FUEL USAGE FRACTION-INTERSECTION	33
FIGURE 9. ALTERNATIVE VEHICLE AND FUEL TECHNOLOGY (PARTIAL) - INTERSECTION	34
FIGURE 10. LINK SOURCE TYPE INPUT TABLE (PARTIAL) - INTERSECTION	35
FIGURE 11. LINKS TABLE-INTERSECTION	36
FIGURE 12. EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH LINK-INTERSECTION	36
FIGURE 13. METEOROLOGY INPUT (AVERAGE JANUARY CONDITIONS)-TERMINAL	39
FIGURE 14. FLEET AGE DISTRIBUTION (PARTIAL)-TERMINAL	40
FIGURE 15. FUEL SUPPLY TABLE-INTERSECTION	41
FIGURE 16. FUEL FORMULATION TABLE-INTERSECTION	41
FIGURE 17. FUEL USAGE FRACTION-INTERSECTION	41
FIGURE 18. ALTERNATIVE VEHICLE AND FUEL TECHNOLOGY (PARTIAL) - INTERSECTION	42
FIGURE 19. LINK SOURCE TYPE INPUT TABLE - TERMINAL	43
FIGURE 20. LINKS TABLE - TERMINAL	43
FIGURE 21. OFF-NETWORK TABLE	43
FIGURE 22. OP-MODE DISTRIBUTION TABLE - TERMINAL	44
FIGURE 23. EMISSION RATES FOR EACH LINK-TERMINAL	44
FIGURE 24. EXAMPLE OF APPROACH AND DEPARTURE LINKS FOR A SIMPLE INTERSECTION	45
FIGURE 25. EXAMPLE SINGLE VEHICLE SPEED TRAJECTORY THROUGH A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION	47
FIGURE 26. EXAMPLE SEGMENTS OF VEHICLE ACTIVITY NEAR A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION	48
                                                                                   11

-------
Section 1: Introduction

1.1    PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDANCE

1.1.1   General

The purpose of this guidance is to describe how to use the MOVES2014 emissions model
to estimate carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from transportation projects, including
roadway intersections, highways, transit projects, parking lots and intermodal terminals.
This guidance can be applied when using MOVES2014 to complete project-level
quantitative CO analysis, including hot-spot analyses for transportation conformity
determinations, modeling project-level emissions for state implementation plan (SIP)
development, and completing analyses pursuant to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA).  This guidance applies in all states other than California, where the most
recently approved version of the EMFAC model is used.  EPA has coordinated with the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in
developing this guidance.

MOVES is a computer model designed by EPA to estimate emissions from cars, trucks,
buses, and motorcycles.l MOVES is designed to allow users to analyze motor vehicle
emissions at multiple scales, from national to county to project-level, using different
levels of input data.  For project-level analyses, MOVES allows users to enter specific
details of vehicle activity for each link in a highway or transit project. In 2010, the
MOVES model version called MOVES2010 officially replaced the previous on-road
emissions model, MOBILE6.2. Subsequently, EPA made minor revisions to this version
in releases of MOVES2010a and MOVES2010b.

MOVES2014 is the first major revision to the MOVES series since the original release of
MOVES2010.  MOVES2014 incorporates new emissions test data, the impacts of new
emissions standards, new features, and other functional improvements, all of which
contribute to improved estimates of criteria pollutant emissions compared to
MOVES2010.  This guidance covers the use of MOVES2014, and all references to
"MOVES" in this guidance apply to MOVES2014 and future versions of the MOVES
model, unless otherwise noted at the time those versions are announced.

Note that this guidance covers only how to use MOVES in estimating CO project-level
emissions; there are other existing resources that support CO project-level analyses. For
example, EPA's regulatory recommendations  for CO air quality modeling can be found
in Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51. Users should continue to consult the "1992 Guideline
for Modeling Carbon Monoxide from Roadway Intersections" (1992 Guideline) for
1 The latest MOVES model, User Guide, and supporting documentation are available online at:
www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm. The latest policy guidance on using MOVES for
transportation conformity and other purposes are also available at:
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policv.htm.

-------
screening analyses of intersection projects for all issues not related to the calculation of
vehicle emission rates (including intersection scope and selection, receptor site selection,
and air quality modeling procedures).2  However, today's MOVES guidance supersedes
the emission factor sections from the 1992 Guideline to reflect the use of MOVES for
project-level CO analyses. See Section 1.2.1 for further background on the 1992
Guideline.  Finally, users should consult EPA's "Transportation Conformity Guidance for
Quantitative Hot-spot Analyses in PM2.5 and PMio Nonattainment and Maintenance
Areas" for how to use MOVES to conduct quantitative PM hot-spot analyses.3

1.1.2  Using this guidance for transportation conformity hot-spot analyses

When using this guidance to complete quantitative CO hot-spot analyses for
transportation conformity purposes, certain specific requirements apply; these are
summarized here.

Transportation conformity is required under Clean Air Act section 176(c) (42 U.S.C.
7506(c)) to ensure that  federally supported highway and transit project activities are
consistent with ("conform to") the purpose of a SIP. EPA's transportation  conformity
rule (40 CFR 51.390 and Part 93) establishes the criteria and procedures for determining
whether transportation  activities conform to the SIP in CO nonattainment and
maintenance areas. The list of areas currently designated  nonattainment and maintenance
for CO can be found on EPA's "Green Book" website at
www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/cindex.html.  This guidance applies for transportation
conformity purposes in areas designated under the current CO NAAQS.4

Table 1 in 40 CFR 93.109(b) of the conformity rule outlines the requirements for project-
level conformity determinations. For example, CO hot-spot analyses must be based on
the latest planning assumptions available at the time the analysis begins (40 CFR 93.110)
and the design concept and scope of the project must be consistent with that included in
the conforming transportation plan and transportation improvement program (TIP) or
regional  emissions analysis (40 CFR 93.115). In addition, interagency consultation must
be used to develop a process to evaluate and choose models and associated methods and
assumptions to be used in CO hot-spot analyses (40 CFR 93.105(c)(l)(i)).  The agencies
that may be involved in the interagency consultation process include the project  sponsor,
state and local transportation and air quality agencies, EPA, and DOT.  The roles and
responsibilities of various agencies for meeting the transportation conformity
requirements are addressed in 40 CFR 93.105 or in a state's approved conformity SIP.
Refer to the conformity rule for a complete listing of all project-level conformity
requirements.
2 "1992 Guideline for Modeling Carbon Monoxide from Roadway Intersections," (EPA-454/R-92-005,
November 1992); available online at: www.epa.gov/scramOO 1/guidance/guide/coguide.pdf.
3 The latest version of this guidance is available online at:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/projectlevel-hotspot. htm#pm-hotspot.
4 This guidance is applicable to current and future CO NAAQS revisions, unless EPA notes otherwise.

-------
EPA has approved MOVES2014 for use in CO hot-spot analyses for project-level
conformity determinations, with a two-year grace period.  Refer to the Federal Register
notice for more information on EPA's approval of MOVES2014 for CO hot-spot
analyses.5 EPA has also issued additional policy guidance on when MOVES2014 will be
required for hot-spot analyses and other purposes.6
1.2    TYPES OF PROJECT-LEVEL co ANALYSES

It is important to understand the context for this MOVES guidance in the overall process
of completing project-level CO analyses.  Project-level CO analyses consist of both
emissions and air quality modeling and can be completed using either a screening or a
refined analysis.  Screening analyses estimate the maximum likely impacts of emissions
from a given source, generally at the receptor with the highest concentrations, based on
worst-case traffic and meteorological data.  Such analyses can save effort in cases where
requirements are met. In contrast, refined analyses use detailed local information and
simulate detailed  atmospheric processes to provide more specialized and accurate
estimates of how  nearby sources affect air quality at downwind locations.

Unless otherwise  noted, the guidance in this document can be used to estimate highway
and transit project emissions for all project-level CO analyses, both screening and
refined. The following sections further describe the relationship of this MOVES
guidance to particular types of screening and refined CO analyses.

1.2.1   Screening analyses of roadway intersections

The 1992 Guideline provides guidance on completing CO screening analyses of roadway
intersections.  As  noted about,  this document only supplants the 1992 Guideline insofar
as to update the emission rate calculation  procedures to reflect the use of MOVES; the
1992 Guideline otherwise remains in effect, and users should continue to consult that
guidance for all issues not related to the calculation of vehicle emission rates (including
intersection  scope and selection,  receptor site  selection, and air quality modeling
procedures).
1.2.2   All other screening analyses
This guidance also covers how to use MOVES for CO screening analyses of projects that
are not explicitly covered by the 1992 Guideline. This would include projects such as:
   •   A mainline highway segment not containing an intersection;
5 See "Federal Register Notice of Availability: Official Release of MOVES2014 Motor Vehicle Emissions
Model for Emissions Inventories in SIPs and Transportation Conformity (PDF); available online at:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy.htm#models
6 "Policy Guidance on the Use of MOVES2014 for State Implementation Plan Development,
Transportation Conformity, and Other Purposes," EPA-420-B-14-008 (July 2014); available online at:
http://www.epa. gov/otaa/models/moves/documents/420b 14008.pdf.

-------
   •   An intersection project that includes off-network activity (that is, any activity not
       occurring on a roadway, such as a truck stop, parking lot, or terminal facility);
   •   Any other project that includes off-network activity;
   •   Transit and other terminal projects.

The guidance will note when different procedures are appropriate when using MOVES to
complete a CO screening analysis for such projects. In some cases, the procedures for
using MOVES for these types of screening analyses will be the same as using MOVES
for a CO refined analysis (see Section 1.2.3).  When this is the case, this guidance covers
these situations in a single section for brevity.

1.2.3   Refined analyses of any project

In certain situations, project sponsors may want or need to complete a CO refined
analysis. Although a refined analysis requires significantly more data and effort, this
option  may be convenient for transportation projects that require both a PM and CO
quantitative hot-spot analysis. This guidance gives additional guidance on using MOVES
for refined analyses to explain how the full capabilities of the model can be employed in
these situations.
1.3    CONTACTS

For specific transportation conformity questions concerning a particular nonattainment or
maintenance area, please contact the transportation conformity staff person responsible
for your state at the appropriate EPA Regional Office. Contact information for EPA
Regional Offices can be found at:
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/contacts.htm.

General questions on using MOVES for CO project-level analysis can be directed to the
MOVES in-box at mobile@epa.gov.

Technical questions about this guidance can be directed to conformity-hotspot@epa.gov.
1.4    GUIDANCE AND EXISTING REQUIREMENTS

This guidance does not create any new requirements. The Clean Air Act and the
regulations described in this document contain legally binding requirements. This
guidance is not a substitute for those provisions or regulations, nor is it a regulation in
itself. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA,  DOT, states, or the
regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon the
circumstances. EPA retains the discretion to adopt approaches on a case-by-case basis
that may differ from this guidance but still comply with the statute and applicable
regulations.  This guidance may be revised periodically without public notice.

-------
Section 2: Estimating Project-Level CO Emissions Using
             MOVES
This guidance addresses the necessary steps to run MOVES to estimate a project's
emissions for a project-level CO analysis. The guidance describes how to provide the
appropriate inputs to MOVES to generate the emission factors necessary to complete the
air quality analysis. This section presumes users already have a basic understanding of
how to run MOVES, either by attending MOVES training or reviewing the MOVES User
Guide.7  Figure 1 describes the general process for estimating the CO emissions at the
project level using MOVES.

Figure 1. Steps for Using MOVES in Project-Level CO Analyses
  Divide the project into
       links
     (Section 2.1)
       I
Determine the number of
MOVES runs
(Section 2.2)


^


Generate Run Specification ("RunSpec")
Enter time period
(Section 2.3.3)
i

Specify county
(Section 2. 3. 4)
i

Select
fuel/vehicle
combination
(Section 2.3.5)


. Select road
1 (Section 2..
I
/ Does project
/ an "off-net\\
( component
\ significant ei
\ starts or idli
type
~6)

have \
nave \
ork" \ Yes Include "off-
igine / type
ns? /
s /
1 No


Select C<
pollutants
processe
(Section 2.



J
& 4. 	
3
/?)


Enter Data into Project Data Manager

Enter meteorology
data
(Section 2.4.1)
I
Build age
distributiontable
(Section 2.4.2)

Define
^ fuels/fuel mix i-*
(Section 2.4.3)
I
Define I/M
program —
(Section 2.4.4)

Populate link Populate off-
source type nenvork table 4 '
(Section 2. 4.5) (Section 2.4.9)
4
Describe link RunMOXTS and
activity . generate emission
(Sections 2.4.6- factors
2.4.8) (Section 2.5)

1 Available via the MOVES website at: www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/

-------
MOVES includes a default database of meteorology, fleet, activity, fuel, and control
program data for the entire United States.  The data included in this database come from a
variety of sources and are not necessarily the most accurate or up-to-date information
available at the local level for a particular project.  This guidance will describe when the
use of that default database is appropriate for a project-level CO analysis.
2.1    CHARACTERIZING A PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS

The first step in completing a project-level CO analysis using MOVES is to define a
project's links in order to accurately capture emissions where they occur. Within
MOVES, a link represents a segment of road (or an "off-network" location as described
below) where a certain type of vehicle activity occurs.  Generally, the links specified for
a project should include segments with similar traffic/activity conditions and
characteristics. For example, a free-flow highway segment with a relatively stable
average speed might be modeled as a single link, whereas an intersection will involve
several types of links, as described further below.  From the link-specific activity and
other inputs, MOVES calculates emissions from every link of a project for a given time
period (or run). In MOVES, running emissions, including periods of idling at traffic
signals, are defined in the Links Importer  (see Section 2.4.6).

This section gives different guidance on how to characterize links in MOVES, depending
on the type of project and CO  analysis involved, as follows:
   •   For a screening analysis of a roadway intersection being completed in accordance
       with the 1992 Guideline, see Section 2.1.1;
   •   For all other screening analyses, including intersection projects that include off-
       network activity,  see Section 2.1.2;
   •   For a refined analysis of any project, see Section 2.1.2.

2.1.1   Screening analyses of roadway intersections

According to EPA's regulatory recommendations for air quality modeling (Section 5.2.3
of Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51), CO screening analyses of intersection projects
should use the CAL3QHC dispersion model. Performing such an analysis for an
intersection using the CAL3QHC dispersion model requires emission rates for both free-
flow traffic (determined by defining "free flow" links)  and idling traffic (determined from
"queue links").8 Free-flow links can be used to represent traffic approaching and
departing an intersection. See Section 3 of this guidance for an example of how to use
MOVES for a CO screening analysis of an intersection.
8 The 1992 Guideline describes how to use CAL3QHC when performing dispersion modeling for
intersections (see 1992 Guideline, page 1-5). To be consistent with the 1992 Guideline, this guidance
recommends use of the CAL3QHC queuing algorithm for intersection idle queues when completing a CO
screening analysis of an intersection. This differs from the recommendation for refined analyses, where
idling should be explicitly included in the link activity entered into MOVES, rather than determined by the
CAL3QHC queuing  algorithm. Since the purpose of a screening analysis is inherently different from that
of a refined analysis, the separate methods still serve the respective goals of each approach.

-------
Note that the 1992 Guideline does not cover screening analyses of intersections that
include off-network activity.  For those situations, refer to Section 2.1.2.

Figure 2 is an example of a simple intersection showing free-flow approach, free-flow
departure, and queue links. The following sections provide more information on how to
define these links in MOVES.

Figure 2. Diagram of Suggested Links for a Simple Intersection
                                                         -  Free-flow
                                                            Approach Link
                                                         -  Free-flow
                                                            Departure Link
                                                         ..  Queue Link
Free-flow Approach and Departure Links

Free-flow links are used to represent vehicle activity on intersection approach and
departure links. The intersection in Figure 2, for example, shows four free-flow approach
and four free-flow departure links. Free-flow links are described by the average speeds
experienced by drivers travelling along the link in the absence of the delay caused by an
intersection traffic signal.  Users should define a free-flow link as the center-to-center
distance from the intersection of interest to the next intersection. As described in Section
4.7.4 of the 1992 Guideline, a maximum of 300 meters for this distance is sufficient, but
users may specify a longer distance for completeness.9
  Since the goal of the MOVES ran is to produce a grams/vehicle-mile emission rate, the exact length or
volume of each link is not important for running MOVES, although it is important for subsequent
CAL3QHC dispersion modeling.

-------
Queue Links

A queue link is used to represent vehicles idling at an intersection.  The intersection in
Figure 2, for example, shows five queue links. Since MOVES is calculating a gram per
vehicle-hour emission factor in this case, the exact length of the queue is not important.
As opposed to free-flow and departure links, which use grams/veh-mile, queue links
require a gram/veh-hour emission rate.

2.1.2  All other screening analyses and refined analyses of any project

When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the 1992 Guideline, or
any refined  analysis, there are several options for characterizing link activity for project-
level CO emissions. The following text describes how different types of links can be
characterized in MOVES.

General

In MOVES, activity on free-flow highway links can be defined by an average speed, link
drive schedule, or operating mode ("Op-Mode") distribution (discussed in Section 2.4.8).
For analyses with MOVES, average speed and traffic volume is required, at a minimum,
for each  link.  If no other information is available, MOVES uses default assumptions of
vehicle activity patterns (called drive cycles) for average speed and type of roadway to
estimate emissions.  Default drive cycles use different combinations of vehicle activity
(acceleration, deceleration, cruise, and/or idle) depending on the speed and road type.
For example, if the link average speed is 30 mph and it is an urban arterial (urban
unrestricted road type), MOVES uses a default drive cycle that includes a high proportion
of acceleration, deceleration, and idle activity as would be expected on an urban arterial
with frequent stops. If the average speed is 60 mph and it is a rural freeway (rural
restricted road type), MOVES uses a default drive cycle that assumes a higher proportion
of cruise activity, smaller proportions of acceleration and deceleration activity, and little
or no idle activity.

Project sponsors  should determine average congested speeds by using appropriate
methods based on best practices used for highway analysis.10 Some resources are
available through FHWA's Travel Model Improvement Program (TMIP).u
Methodologies for computing intersection control delay are provided in the "Highway
Capacity Manual 2010."12
10 When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the 1992 Guideline, or any refined
analysis, idling vehicles should be represented in combination with decelerating, accelerating, and free-
flow traffic on an approach segment of an intersection. Note that this is in contrast to the guidance given
when completing a CO screening analysis of an intersection, when the CAL3QHC queuing algorithm is
recommended in order to be consistent with the 1992 Guideline (see Section 2.1.1).
11 See FHWA's Travel Model Improvement Program website: http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/.
12 Users should consult the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual. As of the release of this
guidance, the latest version is the "Highway Capacity Manual 2010," which can be obtained from the
Transportation Research Board (see http://hcm.trb.org/?qr=l for details).

-------
As described further in Section 2.4.8, for refined analyses, users are encouraged to take
advantage of the full capabilities of MOVES for estimating emissions on different
highway and intersection project links when completing CO refined analyses. Although
average speeds and travel volumes are typically available for most transportation projects
and may need to be relied upon during the transition to using MOVES, users can develop
and use more precise data through the MOVES Operating Mode Distribution Importer or
Link Drive Schedule Importer, as described further below.  When more detailed data are
available to describe the pattern of changes in vehicle activity (proportion of time in
acceleration, deceleration, cruise, or idle activity) over a length of road, MOVES is
capable of calculating these specific emission impacts. EPA encourages users to consider
these options for CO refined analyses of highway and intersection projects, especially as
MOVES is implemented further into the future, or for more advanced MOVES
applications.

Free-flow Highway Links

The links defined in MOVES should capture the expected physical layout of a project and
representative variations in vehicle activity. A simple example would be a single, one
directional, four-lane highway that could be characterized as just one link.  More
sophisticated analyses may break up traffic flow on that single link into multiple links of
varying operating modes or drive cycles that may have different emission factors
depending on the relative acceleration, cruise, or deceleration activity on each segment of
that link. In general, the definition of a  link will depend on how much the type of vehicle
activity (acceleration,  deceleration, cruise or idle) changes over a length of roadway, the
level of detail of available data, and the modeling approach used with MOVES. For a
highway lane where vehicle behavior is fairly constant, the length of the link could be
longer and the use of detailed activity data will have a smaller impact on results.

Intersection Links

If the project analysis  is a CO refined analysis involving intersections, the intersections
need to be treated separately from the free-flow links that connect to those intersections.
Although road segments between intersections may experience free-flow traffic
operations, the approaches and departures from the intersections will likely involve
acceleration, deceleration, and idling activity not present on the free-flow link.  For
intersection modeling, the definition of link length will depend on the geometry of the
intersection, how that  geometry  affects vehicle activity, and the level of detail of
available activity information. Guidance for defining intersection links for a CO refined
analysis is given in the appendix, but the definition of links used for a particular project
will depend of the specific details of that project and the amount of available activity
information.

       Note: For both free-flow highway and inter section links, users may directly enter
       output from traffic simulation models in the form of second-by-second individual
       vehicle trajectories.  These vehicle trajectories for each road segment can be

-------
       input into MOVES using the Link Drive Schedule Importer and defined as unique
       LinklDs.  There are no limits in MOVES as to how many links can be defined;
       however, model run times increase as the user defines more links. More
       information on using vehicle trajectories from traffic microsimulation models for
       CO refined analyses can be found in the appendix.

Off-Network Links

In any project-level CO analysis, the project being analyzed may include "off-network"
activity.  Off-network in the context of MOVES refers to any activity not occurring on a
roadway.  Examples of off-network activity include truck stops, parking lots, and transit
and other terminals. This section describes how to characterize off-network activity into
links; entering off-network links into MOVES using the Off-Network Importer will be
covered in Section 2.4.8.  While an off-network link could have a combination of start,
hotelling, idling, and running activity, note that MOVES can only model one link with
start and hotelling activity per run.  If a project contains multiple links with start and
hotelling activity, separate MOVES runs may be needed.

Start activity:  For off-network sources such as a parking lot or transit terminal, the user
should have information on starts per hour (or peak hour starts).  Additionally, if there are
vehicles starting, it is necessary to provide an estimate of the duration that vehicles are
parked before starting (soak-time distribution). It is recommended that the user divide
such a project into separate links to appropriately characterize variability in emission
density within the project area. In this case, each "link" describes an area with a certain
number of vehicle starts per hour.

Idling activity:
   •  Hotelling: In MOVES, hotelling applies only to long haul combination trucks,
       source type ID 62.  Hotelling activity includes long duration idling (classified in
       MOVES as OpModelD 200), and use of auxiliary power units (APUs, classified
       in MOVES as OpModelD 201). Additionally, hotelling operation using electric
       power (no emissions) can be modeled using OpMode 203. Only one link per run
       can have hotelling activity.
   •  Other Idling:  Idling for other vehicles and shorter periods of idling for long-haul
       combination trucks should be modeled as a project link with an operating mode
       distribution that consists only of idle operation (OpModelD 1).  This can be
       specified in the Links table by inputting the vehicle population, i.e., the number of
       vehicles idling during the hour (or idling during peak hour) and specifying an
       average speed of "0" mph.  There is no limit to the number of links that can have
       this type of idling activity.  Multiple links can be defined for the same off-
       network area to capture idling activity of various vehicle types.

Running activity: Some transit and other terminal projects may have significant running
emissions similar to free-flow highway projects (such as buses and trucks coming to and
from an intermodal terminal). These emissions can be calculated by defining one or
more unique running links as described in Section 2.1.2 and the appendix (that is, in

                                                                                10

-------
addition to any other roadway links associated with the project). These running link
emissions can then be aggregated with the emissions from the other activities happening
on the off-network link (e.g.,  starts and idling from non-running activity on the transit or
other terminal link) outside of the MOVES model to generate the necessary air quality
model inputs.

       Note: The user may choose to exclude sources such as a separate service drive,
       separate small employee parking lot, or other minor sources that are determined
       to be insignificant to project emissions.
2.2    DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS

The following section describes the number of MOVES runs that may be needed for
project-level CO analyses.13

2.2.1   Screening analyses of roadway intersections

For a CO screening analysis of an intersection project, only one MOVES scenario (run) is
necessary for each analysis year. To remain consistent with the 1992 Guideline for such
analyses, this guidance describes how to use "worst-case" conditions.14 To capture
anticipated worst-case conditions, users should define the MOVES run specification
("RunSpec") using the peak hourly traffic volume expected for the intersection project.
As stated in the 1992 Guideline, the peak hour traffic conditions are defined as the
average or typical values during the hour of the day which usually records the  peak hour
traffic, rather than the worst case traffic conditions for the entire year.15 Average speeds,
vehicle mix, and idle times should reflect conditions at the peak period. Project sponsors
should use the appropriate methods based on best practices used for highway analysis in
the area for determining peak period traffic conditions.  Some resources for determining
traffic characteristics are available through FHWA's Travel Model Improvement
Program (TMIP).16 Guidance on how to enter these individual inputs into MOVES is
discussed in Section 2.4.

2.2.2   All other screening analyses

The 1992 Guideline does not expressly address what conditions should be captured for a
CO screening analysis of a project that is not solely a roadway intersection.  Project
sponsors are encouraged to employ best professional practices and appropriate methods
and use the interagency consultation process or procedures to determine the  appropriate
number of MOVES runs for these screening analysis situations.
13 If completing a CO quantitative hot-spot analysis for transportation conformity purposes, users should
refer to the conformity rule requirements when selecting travel activity data.  See Section 1.1.2 for a
summary of these conformity requirements.
14 See 1992 Guideline, Section 4.
15 See 1992 Guideline, Section 1.3.
16 FHWA Travel Model Improvement Program website: http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/.
                                                                                 11

-------
2.2.3   Refined analyses of any project

If MOVES is being used to complete a CO refined analysis, more than one MOVES run
may be needed to capture any emission rate variation due to changes in temperature,
volume, speeds, and fleet mix over the course of the day, season, or year being analyzed.
However, the specific number of MOVES runs needed will depend on the situation. For
example, where potential CO NAAQS violations are expected to occur in only one
quarter of the calendar year (e.g., only a wintertime violation), the user might choose to
model only a single day to represent all days within that quarter. However, if CO
NAAQS violations are expected in multiple quarters, or if variations in travel activity
and/or temperature within a single quarter need to be accounted for, then additional
MOVES runs may be necessary.

Project sponsors may have activity data collected at  a range of possible temporal
resolutions.  Depending on the sophistication of the activity data analysis for a given
project, these data may range from a daily average-hour and peak-hour value to hourly
estimates for all days of the year. The remainder of this section describes how project
sponsors can use MOVES for CO refined analyses in cases where they have (1) typical
travel activity data, and (2) more detailed travel  activity data.

Projects with Typical Travel Activity Data

Traffic forecasts for highway and intersection projects are often completed for  annual
average daily traffic volumes, with an allocation factor for a daily peak-hour volume.
This data can be used to conduct an analysis with MOVES that is representative for all
hours of the day, or year being considered. The most reasonable methods in accordance
with good practice should be used to obtain the peak-hour allocation factors and diurnal
distribution of traffic and the methods must be determined in accordance with interagency
consultation procedures (40 CFR 93.105(c)(l)(i).  It is important to capture variation in
emission rates as activity and ambient temperature change over the period being
analyzed.

One option is to represent traffic over four time periods: morning peak (AM), midday (MD),
evening peak (PM), and overnight (ON). For example, the peak-hour volume can be used
to represent activity conditions over a three-hour morning (AM) and three-hour evening
(PM)  period. The remaining 18  hours of the day can be represented by the average-hour
volume (AADT minus the total volume assigned to the peak period, divided by the number
of off-peak hours).  These 18 hours would be divided into a midday (MD) and overnight
(ON)  period.

The following is one  suggested approach for an  analysis employing the average-
hour/peak-hour traffic scenario:
   •   Morning peak (AM) emissions based on traffic data and meteorology occurring
       between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m.;
   •   Midday (MD) emissions  based on data from  9 a.m. to 4 p.m.;
   •   Evening peak (PM) emissions  based on data  from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.; and
                                                                               12

-------
   •   Overnight (ON) emissions based on data from 7 p.m. to 6 a.m.

Also, if there are local or project-specific data to suggest that the AM or PM peak traffic
periods will occur in different hours than the default values suggested here, or over a
longer or shorter period of time, the hours representing each time period may adjusted
accordingly.

Projects with Additional Travel Activity Data

Some project sponsors may have developed traffic or other activity data to show
variations in volume and speed across hours, days, or months. Additionally, if users are
modeling a transit or other terminal project, traffic volumes, starts, and idling estimates
are likely to be readily available for each hour of the day. Under either of these
circumstances, users may  choose to apply the methodology described above (using
average-hour and peak-hour as representative for all hours of the time period being
calculated).  Alternatively, additional MOVES runs could be generated to produce unique
emission factors using these additional activity data and emission factors for each period
of time for which specific activity data are available.
2.3    DETERMINING BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS

Once the user has defined the project conceptually in terms of links and determined the
number of MOVES runs, the next step in using MOVES for project-level analyses is to
develop a run specification ("RunSpec"). The RunSpec is a computer file in XML
format that can be edited and executed directly or with the MOVES Graphical User
Interface (GUI).  MOVES requires the user to set up a RunSpec to define the place and
time of the analysis as well as the vehicle types, road types, fuel types, and the emission-
producing processes and pollutants that will be included in the analysis. The headings in
this subsection describe each set of input options needed to create the RunSpec as defined
in the Navigation panel of the MOVES GUI. In order to create a project-level RunSpec,
the user must go  down the Navigation panel filling in  the appropriate data for each of the
items listed.  Those panels are:
   •   Description
   •   Scale
   •   Time Spans
   •   Geographic Bounds
   •   Vehicles/Equipment
   •   Road Type
   •   Pollutants and Processes
   •   Manage Input Data Sets
   •   Strategies
   •   Output
   •   Advanced Performance Features
                                                                              13

-------
Additional information on each panel can be found in the MOVES User Guide available
on EPA's website (www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm).  The appropriate
sections of the user guide are referenced when describing the RunSpec creation process
below.

2.3.1   Description

This panel allows the user to enter a description of the RunSpec using up to 5,000
characters of text.  Entering a complete description of the RunSpec is important for users
to keep track of their MOVES runs as well as to provide supporting documentation for
the regulatory submission. Users may want to identify the project, the time period being
analyzed, and the purpose of the analysis in this field.

2.3.2   Scale

The Scale panel in MOVES allows the user to select different scales or domains for the
MOVES analysis.  All MOVES runs for project-level analyses must be done using the
"Project" domain in the "Scale" panel.  The Project domain is necessary to allow
MOVES to accept detailed activity input at the link level.1?

The Scale panel also requires users to select either "Inventory" or "Emission Rates"
which produces output as either grams/hour or grams/vehicle-mile emission rates,
respectively.18

For screening analyses of intersections, since CAL3QHC requires emission rates in terms
of both grams/vehicle-mile for free-flow links and grams/veh-hour for queue links, users
performing an analysis for a project which includes vehicle queuing (such as is the case
with an intersection) should select Inventory as output.  From the Inventory output,
appropriate emission rates can be calculated through several post-processing steps
described in Section 2.5.

When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the 1992 Guideline, or
any refined analysis, users may benefit from choosing either Rates or Inventory
depending on the specifics of the project (including the air quality model being used to
complete the analysis):
   •   When a grams/hour emission factor is needed for air quality modeling, users
       should select "Inventory," which produces results for total emissions on each link;
       this is equivalent to a grams/hour/link emission factor.
   •   When a gram/vehicle-mile emission factor is needed, the "Emission Rates" option
       should be selected  to produce link specific grams/vehicle-mile emission factors.
17 Running MOVES using the "County" or "National" domains would not allow for detailed link level
input or output that is needed for project-level CO analyses.
18 The Scale panel also includes options for Onroad or Nonroad models. This guidance applies only to the
Onroad model in MOVES.
                                                                                14

-------
This guidance explains the steps of post-processing both "Inventory" and "Emission
Rates" results to produce the desired emission factors in Section 2.5.

2.3.3  Time Spans

The Time Spans panel is used to define the specific time period covered in the MOVES
run.  The Time Spans panel is divided into five sections, which allow the user to select
time aggregation level, year, month, day, and hour included in the run.

The MOVES model processes one hour, of one day, of one month, of one year for each
run; that is, each MOVES run represents one specific hour. The user should enter the
desired time period in the MOVES Time Spans panel. Time aggregation should be  set to
"hour," which indicates no pre-aggregation.  The "day" selection should be set to
"weekday" or "weekend," but not both.

To be consistent with the  1992 Guideline, for a CO screening analysis of an intersection,
the year, month, and hour should be set to specifically describe the peak traffic scenario.
For example, the run describing a peak traffic scenario might be: 2015, January,  8:00 to
8:59 a.m. (both the start and end hours set to "8:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m.").

2.3.4  Geographic Bounds

The Geographic Bounds panel allows  the user to define the specific county that will be
modeled. The MOVES database includes county codes and descriptive information for
all 3,222 counties in the United States. Specifying a county in MOVES determines
certain default information for the analysis. Users should select the specific county
where the project is located. Only a single county (or single custom domain) can be
included in a MOVES run at the project level. If a project spans multiple counties, users
have three options:
    1.  If the county-specific local data is the same for all the counties in the project,
       select the county in which the majority of the project is located;
    2.  If not, separate the project into multiple parts, each of which is in a separate
       county, and do a separate MOVES  run for each part; or
    3.  Use the custom domain option to model one unique area that represents all the
       project counties.

2.3.5  Vehicles/Equipment

The Vehicles/Equipment panel is used to specify the vehicle types that are  included in the
MOVES run. MOVES allows the user to select from among 13 "source use types" (the
terminology that MOVES uses to describe vehicle types), and several different fuels.
Some fuel/source type combinations do not exist (e.g., diesel motorcycles) and therefore
are not included in the MOVES database.  Users should always select Gasoline,  CNG,
Diesel, and Ethanol (E-85) and all valid vehicle type combinations in the
Vehicle/Equipment panel to reflect the full range of vehicles that will operate in  the
project area.

                                                                               15

-------
2.3.6  Road Type

The Road Type panel is used to define the types of roads that are included in the project.
MOVES defines five different Road Types:
   •   Rural Restricted Access - a rural highway that can be accessed only by an on-
       ramp;
   •   Rural Unrestricted Access - all other rural roads (arterials, connectors, and local
       streets);
   •   Urban Restricted Access - an urban highway that can be accessed only by an on-
       ramp;
   •   Urban Unrestricted Access - all other urban roads (arterials, connectors, and local
       streets); and
   •   Off-Network - any location where the predominant activity is vehicle starts and
       hotelling (parking lots, truck stops, rest areas, freight or bus terminals).

MOVES uses these road types to determine the default drive cycle on a particular link.
For example, MOVES uses drive cycles for unrestricted access road types that assume
stop-and-go driving, including multiple accelerations, decelerations, and short periods of
idling. For restricted access road types, MOVES uses drive cycles that include a higher
fraction of cruise activity with much less time spent accelerating and idling.

Road Type is a necessary input into the RunSpec and users should select one or more of
the five road types  that correspond to the road types of the project. The determination of
rural or urban road types should be based on the Highway Performance Monitoring
System (HPMS) functional classification of the road type.
2.3.7  Pollutants and Processes

The Pollutant and Processes panel is used to select both the types of pollutants and the
emission processes that produce them.  When completing a CO screening analysis of an
intersection project using CAL3QHC, both free-flow and queue links will be
characterized.  For CO emissions from these links, MOVES calculates emissions for two
separate processes:
   •   Running Exhaust
   •   Crankcase Running Exhaust

If modeling an intersection, users should select Carbon Monoxide (CO): "Running
Exhaust" and "Crankcase Running Exhaust." Emission rates will be post-processed from
the MOVES output to calculate an aggregate of both processes.

MOVES does not automatically sum the appropriate processes to create an aggregate
emission factor, although EPA has created MOVES scripts that automate the summing of
aggregate emissions when completing project-level analyses. These  scripts are available
through the post-processing menu of the MOVES GUI and are discussed in Section 2.5
                                                                               16

-------
When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the 1992 Guideline, or
any refined analysis, users can similarly sum the processes described above using the
MOVES post-processing scripts to calculate aggregate emissions from the MOVES
output.

If the project contains an off-network link, users should select Carbon Monoxide (CO):
"Starting Exhaust", "Crankcase Starting Exhaust", "Extended Idling Exhaust",
"Crankcase Extended Idling Exhaust", and/or "Auxiliary Power Exhaust" depending on
the vehicle activity occurring on the off-network link.  Emission rates will  need to be
post-processed from the MOVES output using the MOVES post-processing scripts
discussed in Section 2.5.

2.3.8 Manage Input Databases
(MOVES User Guide Section 2.2.8)

Most project-level CO analyses will not use the Manage Input Data Sets panel. One
possible application is to specify user-supplied databases to be read by the model during
execution of a run. However, for project-level analyses in MOVES, the Project Data
Manager, described in Section 2.4, serves this same function while providing for the
creation of data table templates and for the review of default data.  EPA specifically
developed the Project Data Manager for project analyses and recommends using it to
create and specify user supplied database tables instead of the Manage Input Databases
panel.
2.3.9   Strategies

In MOVES, the Strategies panel does not contain any relevant options or inputs for
project-level analysis, and should be skipped.
2.3.10 Output

Selecting Output in the Navigation panel provides access to two additional panels:
General Output and Output Emissions Detail. Each of these allows the user to specify
aspects of the output data.

Under General Output, users should make sure to choose "grams" and "miles" for the
output units in order to provide results for air quality modeling. Also, "Distance
Traveled" and "Population" should be selected under the "Activity" heading to obtain
vehicle volume information for each link in the output.

Output Emissions Detail is used to specify the level of detail desired in the output data.
Emissions by hour and link are the default selections and cannot be changed.  EPA
recommends that users select the box labeled "Emission Process."  No other boxes should
be selected in order to produce fleet aggregate emission rates for each link.  Emission

                                                                               17

-------
rates for each process can be appropriately summed to calculate aggregate CO emission
rates for each link (as described previously in Section 2.3.7).

2.3.11 Advanced Performance Features

Most project-level CO analyses will not use the Advanced Performance Features panel.
This panel can be skipped.
2.4    ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING THE PROJECT DATA MANAGER

After completion of all the necessary panels to create the RunSpec, the user must then
create the necessary input database tables that describe the project in detail. For a typical
project-level analysis, only one set of input database tables will need to be created. This
is done using the Project Data Manager, which can be accessed from the Pre-Processing
menu item at the top of the MOVES GUI or by selecting Enter/Edit Data in the Domain
Input Database section of the Geographic Bounds panel.

The Project Data Manager includes multiple tabs that open importers, which are used to
enter project-specific data. These tabs and importers are:
    •  Meteorology Data
    •  Age Distribution
    •  Fuel
    •  Inspection and Maintenance
    •  Link Source Type
    •  Links
    •  Link Drive Schedule
    •  Operating Mode Distribution
    •  Off-Network
    •  Hotelling
    •  Retrofit Data

Each of the importers allows the user to create a template file with required data field
names and with some key fields populated. The user then edits this template to add
project specific local data with a spreadsheet application or other tool and imports the
data  files into MOVES. In some importers, there is also the option to export default data
from the MOVES database in order to  review it.  Once the user determines that the
default data are accurate and applicable to the particular project, or determines that the
default data need to be changed and makes those changes, the user then imports that data
into MOVES. Details of the mechanics of using the data importers are provided in the
MOVES User Guide. Guidance for the use of these importers when completing project-
level CO analyses is described below.

       Note: Most analyses  will not use all of the importers, and it is not necessary to see
       all "green checks" to run MOVES.  For instance,  a project with no off-network


                                                                              18

-------
       links will not use the Off-Network, Operating Mode Distribution, or Hotelling
       importers when activity is defined through the average speed function of the Links
       importer. These tabs will remain "redX's " but do not indicate a problem with a
       run.

For all project-level CO analyses, if the project contains an off-network link, both the
Off-Network table and Operating Mode Distribution table should be populated and
imported (as well  as the Hotelling table if hotelling activity is occurring in the project.)
See Sections 2.1.2 and 2.4.8 for information on modeling off-network links in MOVES.

2.4.1   Meteorology

The Meteorology  Data Importer is used to import temperature and humidity data for the
month and hour that are defined in the MOVES run specification. Default temperature
and humidity values are available in MOVES, but are not recommended for use in a
project-level CO analysis.

Screening Analyses of Roadway Intersections

The 1992 Guideline recommends the following two options for defining temperature and
humidity for screening analyses of intersections:

    1.  The temperature and humidity corresponding to each of the ten highest non-
       overlapping 8-hour CO monitoring values for the last three years should be
       obtained.  The average 8-hour temperature and humidity for each event should be
       calculated  and then all ten values should be averaged for use with MOVES.
   2.  Alternatively, the average temperature and humidity in January may be used
                                                                            19
Meteorological data may be obtained either from the National Weather Service (NWS) or
as part of a site-specific measurement program.  Local universities, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), military stations, and state and local air agencies may also be
sources of such data. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC; online at www.ncdc.noaa.gov) is the world's largest active
archive of weather data through which years of archived data can be obtained. A data
source should be selected that is representative of local meteorological conditions.

All  Other Screening Analyses

The 1992 Guideline does not expressly address what conditions should be captured for a
CO screening analysis of a project that is not solely a roadway intersection.  However,
the  guidance given in the 1992 Guideline may also be appropriate for any CO screening
analysis.

Refined Analyses of Any Project
19 See 1992 Guideline, Section 4.7.1.

                                                                               19

-------
For refined analyses, users should enter data specific to the project's location and time
period modeled, as CO emissions are found to vary significantly depending on
temperature.  As discussed in Section 2.2.3, MOVES will typically be run for multiple
time periods and specific meteorology data that accurately represents these runs is
needed. Within each period of the day, in each quarter selected, temperatures should be
used that represent the average temperature within that time period.  For example, for
January AM peak periods corresponding to 6 a.m. to 9 a.m., the average January
temperature based on the meteorological record for those hours should be used in
estimating the average January AM peak period temperature for MOVES runs.  The user
may choose to run additional hours and temperatures beyond the number of traffic
periods for which data exist. For example, within an 11-hour overnight (ON) modeling
period, temperature data could be used to differentiate hours with significantly different
temperatures, despite having assumed identical traffic estimates. Humidity estimates
should be based on the  same hours and data source as the temperature estimates.

2.4.2  Age Distribution

The Age Distribution Importer is used to enter data that provides the distribution of
vehicle fractions by age for each calendar year (yearlD) and vehicle type
(sourceTypelD). These data are required for running MOVES at the project level.  The
distribution of agelD (the variable for age) fractions must sum to one for each vehicle
type and year.

To build a MOVES-compatible age distribution table for project-level CO analyses, there
are three possible options.

    1.  If available, users should use the latest available state or local age distribution
       assumptions from their SIP or transportation conformity regional emissions
       analysis.

   2.  If the project is  designed to serve a fleet that operates only locally, such as a
       drayage yard or bus terminal, the user should provide project-specific fleet age
       distribution data.  For most captive fleets, an exact age distribution should be
       readily available or obtainable. The data should be in a format compatible with
       MOVES.

    3. If no  state or local age distribution is available, the MOVES default age
       distribution should be used.  This can be obtained from the tables available on the
       EPA website: www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/tools.htm.  The user can select
       the analysis year(s) and find the corresponding age distribution.  These fractions
       are national defaults and could be significantly different than the local  project age
       distribution. Age distribution can have a considerable impact on emission
       estimates, so the default data should be used only if an alternative state or local
       dataset cannot be obtained.
                                                                                20

-------
2.4.3   Fuel

The Fuel Importer contains four required tables: Fuel Supply, Fuel Formulation, Fuel
Usage, and AVFT (Alternative Vehicle and Fuel Technology). The Fuel Supply table
defines the fuels present in the project area. The Fuel Formulation table defines the
properties of those fuels. The Fuel Usage table defines the fraction of Ethanol (E-85)
capable vehicles that are using E-85 vs. conventional gasoline. Finally, the AVFT table
defines the prevalence of each vehicle/fuel type combination for the project area.

Users should review the default fuel data in MOVES by exporting it through the Fuel tab,
and make changes only if local volumetric fuel property information is available.
Otherwise, EPA strongly recommends that the MOVES default fuel information be used
for project-level CO analyses unless a full  local fuel property study exists.  The exception
to this is in the case of Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP), where a user should change the value
to reflect the differences between ethanol and non-ethanol blended gasoline. This should
be done using the "Fuel Wizard" accessible in the Fuel tab. See the MOVES  user guide
for additional information about using the Fuel Wizard.

For additional guidance on defining fuel information, consult the MOVES  Technical
Guidance, available online at:
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy.htmtfmodels.
2.4.4   Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)

Projects within areas covered by an I/M program should define the program in the
MOVES Inspection and Maintenance Importer.  Users should first examine the default
I/M program description included in MOVES for the particular county in question.  The
default I/M data can be reviewed by selecting the Export Default Data button in the I/M
tab of the Project Data Manager. Users should review the details of the default I/M
program and make any necessary changes to match the actual local program that is
planned to be in place in the year being analyzed.

For additional guidance on defining an I/M program in MOVES, consult the MOVES
Technical Guidance, available online at:
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy.htmtfmodels.

2.4.5   Link Source Type

The Link Source Type Importer allows users to enter the fraction of the link traffic
volume which is represented by each vehicle type (source type).  It is not required if the
project contains only an off-network link.  For each LinkID, the
"SourceTypeHourFractions" must  sum to one across all source types.
                                                                               21

-------
Additionally, the user must ensure that the source types selected in the MOVES
Vehicles/Equipment panel match the source types defined through the Link Source Type
Importer.

There are no defaults that can be exported from the Link Source Type Importer. For any
analysis at the project level, the user must provide source type fractions for all vehicles
being modeled. There are two options available to populate the Link Source Type input:

    1.  For projects that will have an entirely different source type distribution than that
       of the regional fleet, the preferred option is for the user to collect project-specific
       data.  This data could be based on analysis of similar existing projects.

    2.  If the  project traffic data suggests that the source type distribution for the project
       can be represented by the distribution of the regional fleet for a given road type,
       the user can provide a source type distribution consistent with the road type used
       in the latest regional emissions analysis.
2.4.6  Links

The Links Importer is used to define the individual roadway links. All links being
modeled should have unique IDs. The Links Importer requires information on each
link's length (in miles), traffic volume (units of vehicles per hour), average speed (miles
per hour), and road grade (percent).  Users should follow guidance given in Section 2.1
when determining the number of links and the length of each link.
2.4.7  Retrofit Data

The Retrofit Importer is used to apply a retrofit program to the fleet.  For example, a bus
terminal project might include plans to mitigate emissions by retrofitting the bus fleet that
will operate at that terminal with control equipment that reduces CO emissions. In that
case, the user would specify the details of the retrofit project using the Retrofit Data
Importer.  The latest guidance on retrofit programs can be located at the EPA's
conformity website: www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/policy.htm. Strategies
that affect vehicle activity, such as implementing a truck idle reduction plan, should be
handled in the Off-Network Importer and Links Importer.
2.4.8  Describing vehicle activity for screening analyses of roadway intersections

The Links Importer is also where users may describe vehicle activity for intersection
links, including the approach/departure free-flow links and queue links.

Consistent with the 1992 Guideline, to produce emission rates for a CO screening
analysis of an intersection, users performing such an analysis should calculate emissions

                                                                                22

-------
based on average speeds. The average speed defined for each link is internally matched
with a MOVES default drive cycle based on that average speed, road grade, and road
type and used to calculate emissions.  The intersection free-flow links and queue links
should be defined as follows:

Free-Flow Approach and Departure Links

An average free-flow speed and traffic volume should be defined for each free-flow link
that reflects conditions at peak traffic conditions.  A variety of methods are available to
estimate average free-flow speed.  Project sponsors should use the appropriate method
based on best practices used for highway analysis in the area for determining congested
average speeds.

Queue Links

Queue links should be assigned  an average speed of zero, indicating entirely idle
operation.

2.4.9  Describing vehicle activity for all other screening analyses and refined analyses
       of any project

When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the  1992 Guideline, or
any refined analysis, users may use the average speed input or choose to use alternative
MOVES activity inputs such as  a Link Drive Schedule or Operating Mode Distribution.
This section describes these options in more detail, as well as describing how to enter off-
network activity into MOVES.

Entering Link Activity into MOVES

MOVES determines vehicle emissions based on operating modes, which represent
different types of vehicle activity such as acceleration (at different rates), deceleration,
idle, and cruise that have distinct emission rates. MOVES handles these data in the form
of a distribution of the time vehicles spend in different operating modes.  This capability
is central to the use of MOVES for CO refined analyses, in particular, because it allows
for the analysis of fine distinctions between vehicle behavior and emissions. For
example, the full emission benefits of a project designed to smooth traffic flow can best
be realized by taking into account the changes in acceleration, deceleration,  and idle
activity that result from the  project.

There are several methods that users may employ to calculate an Op-Mode distribution
based on the project design  and  available traffic information.  MOVES currently offers
three options that the user can employ to add link activity data, depending on data
availability.  These are:

    1.  Provide average speed and road type through the Links input:
                                                                                23

-------
       Using this approach, MOVES will calculate emissions based on a default drive
       cycle for a given speed, grade, and road type.  Input of link drive schedules or
       operating mode distributions is not needed.  For users modeling a free-flow link
       with only basic information on average speed and volume on a link, this option
       may be appropriate. This approach accounts for some differences in emissions
       due to changes in operating modes associated with different average speeds on a
       specific road type. However, this approach provides the least resolution when
       analyzing the emission impact of a project because the default drive cycles used
       by the model may not accurately reflect the specific project. For instance, due to
       the range of operating modes associated with intersection projects, a single
       average speed would not spatially capture localized idling and acceleration
       emissions.

   2.  Provide a link drive schedule using the Link Drive Schedule Importer:
       The Link Drive Schedule Importer allows the user to define the precise speed and
       grade as a function of time (seconds) on a particular roadway link. The time
       domain is entered in units of seconds, the speed variable is miles-per-hour and the
       grade variable in percent grade (vertical distance/lateral distance, 100% grade
       equals  a 45-degree slope).  MOVES builds an Operating Mode Distribution from
       the Link Drive Schedule and uses it to calculate link running emissions.

       Individual Link Drive Schedules cannot be entered for separate source types.  The
       Link Drive Schedule therefore represents the "tracer" path of an average vehicle
       on each link. Link drive schedules could be based on observations using methods
       such as chase (floating) cars on similar types of links, or on  expected vehicle
       activity based  an analysis of link geometry.  Link drive  schedules will only
       represent average vehicle activity, not the full range of activity that will occur on
       the link.  As described in the appendix, users can overcome  this limitation by
       defining multiple links for the same portion of the project (links that "overlap")
       with separate source distributions and drive schedules to model individual
       vehicles.

   3.  Provide a detailed operating mode distribution for the link:
       The Operating Mode Distribution Importer allows the user to directly import
       operating mode fraction data for  source types, hour/day combinations, roadway
       links, and pollutant/process combinations that are included in the run
       specification.  Operating mode distributions may be obtained from:
          •   Op-Mode distribution data from other locations  with similar geometric
              and operational (traffic) characteristics;20 or
20 For example, chase (or floating) cars, traffic cameras, and radar guns have been used previously to
collect some traffic data for use in intelligent transportation systems and other applications. EPA
encourages the development of validated methods for collecting verifiable vehicle operating mode
distribution data at specific locations representative of different projects covered by this guidance.
                                                                                 24

-------
           •  Output from traffic micro-simulation models.21

Users should consider the discussion in this section when deciding on the appropriate
activity input, as the MOVES model is capable of using complex and highly resolved
activity datasets to calculate link level emissions.  EPA encourages the development of
validated methods for collecting verifiable vehicle Op-Mode distribution data at locations
and in traffic conditions representative of different projects covered by this guidance.
However, the user should determine the most robust activity dataset that can be
reasonably collected while still achieving the goal of determining an  accurate assessment
of the CO air quality impacts from a given project. The decision to populate the Links
table, Link Drive Schedule, or Op-Mode Distribution should be based on the data
available to the user and should reflect the vehicle activity and behavior on each link.

       Note: If either the average speed or link-drive schedule approach is used, it is not
       necessary to input an Op-Mode distribution for on-road link activity.

Entering Off-Network Links

Using the Off-Network Importer is only necessary for project-level CO analyses if the
project includes an area where vehicles are parked, starting their engines, or in hotelling
mode (such as a truck stop, parking lot, or passenger or freight intermodal terminal). In
these cases, the off-network table should be populated and imported.22

There are no default values available for any of the off-network inputs, so users will need
to populate the Off-Network table with information describing vehicle activity in the off-
network area being modeled.  The required fields are vehicle population, start fraction,
and extended idle fraction:
   •  The vehicle population reflects the total number of vehicles parked, starting, or
       hotelling on the off-network area over the course of the hour covered by the
       MOVES run.
   •  The start fraction is the fraction of the total vehicle population that starts during
       the hour.
   •  The extended idle fraction specifies the fraction of time that the vehicle
       population spends in hotelling  operation in the hour.23

Hotelling operation applies only to long-haul combination trucks and is defined as the
operation of the truck in "hotelling" mode, typically at overnight rest areas. In order to
heat and cool the cab, as well  as to run appliances, an added energy load is necessary.
This energy is provided either by the engine  (extended idle mode), auxiliary power unit
21 A traffic micro-simulation model can be used to construct link drive schedules or operating mode
distributions if prior validation of the model's predictions of speed and acceleration patterns for roadway
links similar to those in the project was conducted. If a user has a micro-simulation model that has been
previously demonstrated to adequately predict speed/acceleration patterns for relevant vehicle classes (e.g.,
heavy-duty), and has a procedure for importing data into MOVES, it may be appropriate to use the micro-
simulation model.
22 See the MOVES User Guide for more information about using the Off-Network Importer.
23 Parked fraction is not required as an input and can be left blank.

                                                                                   25

-------
(APU mode), or truck-stop electrification (essentially modeled as engine-off). Shorter
periods of idling for long-haul combination trucks and all idling for other vehicles should
be modeled as a project link with an Op-Mode distribution that consists only of idle
operation (Op-Mode 1).  This can be specified in the Links table by inputting the vehicle
population and specifying an average speed of "0" mph.

For vehicle population inputs, the user should be able to rely on existing project
documentation. The user will also need to  estimate the number of starts  and hotelling
operation of the facility during the peak hour. For example, in a bus terminal project, the
user could estimate the number of starts for the peak hour based on expected passenger
ridership and proposed operating schedules for the buses using the terminal.

Information on start and hotelling activity should be specific to the project being
modeled. However, data from similar projects could be adapted  for use in a CO hot-spot
analysis, when appropriate.  For instance, the ratio of starts to vehicles for a project being
analyzed could be determined by studying  a similar parking lot.

If an off-network link is defined, users must also define an Op-Mode distribution that
describes the  soak-time distribution of vehicles on the link; this will affect the start
emissions.  Any hotelling operation on an off-network link must be described by the Op-
Mode distribution with a fraction of 1.0 for Opmode ID 200 (Extended Idle Mode), 1.0
for Opmode ID 201 (APU use),  and/or 1.0  Opmode ID 203 (engine-off/truck stop
electrification).

There are no default soak-time distributions available.  Soak times and soak-time
distributions should be specific to the type  of project being modeled.  The soak time is
the time a vehicle is stationary with the engine turned off, following the last time it was
operated. This information could either be directly collected or obtained from
information collected for a similar project.  For instance, a park-and-ride lot may have
vehicles parked for eight or nine hours prior to starting, while an intermodal freight
terminal may have vehicles parked for only one hour before starting.  This information
should be defined through the appropriate distribution of soak-time Op-Modes
(OpModelDs 101-108) in the Op-Mode distribution table.

Additionally, users modeling hotelling activity must also import  a
hotellingactivitydistribution table through the Hotelling Importer of the Project Data
Manager. This input describes, by model year, the amount of hotelling activity in  each of
four modes: extended idle mode, auxiliary  power mode, battery power (electrification),
and engine-off. Note that battery power and engine-off both yield zero emissions.
Default information is available, but should not be used. Local hotelling activity for a
given project will likely  be different than the national defaults.

The methods  and assumptions used to derive off-network inputs  (including starts,
hotelling activity, and soak-time distributions) should be documented as  part of the
analysis, including any adjustments based on data from similar projects.
                                                                                26

-------
2.5    GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING

When run to calculate "Inventory" output (as described in Section 2.3.2), the MOVES
model does not explicitly produce the required emission rates. The emission results are
calculated by MOVES in terms of absolute grams for each link defined in the "Links"
input file. Therefore, the user will need run a MOVES post-processing script to generate
the grams/vehicle-mile, grams/vehicle-hour, or other appropriate emission rate. The
following sections describe these procedures in more detail for CO screening analyses of
intersections as well as other situations.

2.5.1   Screening analyses of roadway intersections

As noted earlier, according to EPA's regulatory recommendations for air quality
modeling (Section 5.2.3 of Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51), the CAL3QHC model
would be used for CO screening analyses of intersection projects. CAL3QHC calculates
air quality estimates based on the defined emission rate, volume of traffic on, and length
of a given link in combination with information on signal timing, queue length, and
Level-of-Service (LOS).  For these analyses, the  required information from MOVES is a
grams/vehicle-mile emission rate for each free-flow link and a grams/vehicle-hour
emission rate for each queue link.  After running  MOVES, the CO_CAL3QHC_EF script
can be run on the output database. The script can be accessed through the MOVES post-
processing menu. After running the script, a new table will be created in the MOVES
output database called "CO_EmissionFactors"  (note: you may need to refresh the
MySQL workbench screen to display).  The table will contain summary gram/veh-mile
rates for running/free-flow links and gram/veh-hour idle rates for queue links.  These
rates may be used directly in CAL3QHC.
2.5.2  All other screening analyses and refined analyses of any project

When completing screening analyses of projects not covered by the 1992 Guideline, or
any refined analysis, MOVES provides results as either an emission total (if "Inventory"
output is selected when developing the RunSpec) or an emission factor (if "Emission
Rates" output is selected). The emission results are produced for each pollutant and
process and are calculated in terms of grams per link or grams/vehicle-mile per link.

Depending on the application, either grams/veh-hour/link or grams/veh-mile/link
emission rates may be necessary.  To generate a grams/link/hour emission rate, users may
run the CO_Grams_Per_Hour script on a completed output database.  The script can be
accessed in the post-processing menu of MOVES. After successfully running the script,
a new table will be created in the output database called "CO_Grams_Per_Hour." The
emission rates from this table can be used in a refined model such as AERMOD.

To generate a grams/mile/link emission rate, users may run the
CO_Grams_Per_Veh_Mile script on a completed output database.  The script can be
accessed in the post-processing menu of MOVES. After successfully running the script,

                                                                             27

-------
a new table will be created in the output database called "CO_Grams_Per_Veh_Mile."
The emission rates from this table can be used in a refined model such as CALQHCR.

This concludes the discussion on how to generate project-level CO emission rates using
MOVES. Please refer to the 1992 Guideline and Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51 for
further information on how to incorporate MOVES emission rates into air quality
modeling.
                                                                            28

-------
Section 3: Example: Using MOVES for a CO Screening
             Analysis of an Intersection

The following is an abbreviated example of using MOVES to calculate CO emission
rates for a portion of an intersection project.  The example shown is of a single, one-way
arterial road through a signalized intersection; while real-world projects would be more
complex, this simplified example makes it easier to demonstrate the steps necessary to
calculate emission rates using MOVES.

This example does not include the subsequent air quality modeling; project sponsors
should refer to the 1992 Guideline for an example of running CAL3QHC for an
intersection project using CO emission rates.

Note also that this example includes only an intersection of the type covered by the 1992
Guideline.  This example is not relevant for CO refined analyses and may not be relevant
for other types of projects.  Additionally, all activity will be defined through the average
speed function of the Links Importer.  It is therefore not necessary to import a Link Drive
Schedule, Op-Mode Distribution, or Off-Network table.

The following is some pertinent data about the example project being analyzed:
   •   The analysis is of a single intersection (see next section for details) located in a
       county in a state other than California.
   •   The analysis month and year is January 2015.
   •   Meteorological data for January at this location is 16.1 degrees Fahrenheit and
       80.3% relative humidity.
   •   All vehicle types are present in the intersection being analyzed; however,  no local
       age distribution is available.
   •   There is no I/M program for the county where the project is located. This  input
       will not be used.
3.1    CHARACTERIZING THE PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS (SECTION 2.1)

A diagram of one road involved in a proposed intersection project is shown in Figure 3.
A single free-flow approach link (Link 1) leads to a signalized intersection; vehicles idle
at the defined queue link (Link 2), and exit the intersection on the free-flow departure
link (Link 3). Vehicle volumes and average speeds are estimated to reflect typical peak
hour activity:

Link 1  (Free-flow Approach Link): 1000 vehicles per hour - 45 mph average speed
Link 2  (Queue Link):  1000 vehicles per hour - 0 mph speed (idle)
Link 3  (Free-flow Departure Link): 1000 vehicles per hour - 45 mph average speed

All links are at 0% grade.  Approach and departure links each have  a length of 300
meters. The queue link is  assigned a link length of 50 meters.

                                                                             29

-------
      Note: Since the goal of the MOVES run is to produce a grams/vehicle-mile and/or
      grams/vehicle-hour emission rate(s), the exact length or volume of each link is not
      important for running MOVES, although it is important for subsequent
      CAL3QHC dispersion modeling.

Figure 3. Links Characterizing the Proposed Intersection
            Linkl
          (Free-flow
          Approach)
 Link 2
(Queue)
  LinkS
(Free-flow
Departure)
3.2    DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS (SECTION 2.2)

This example follows the 1992 Guideline by conservatively using typical peak-hour
traffic activity in one MOVES run to generate emission rates.
3.3    DETERMINE BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS (SECTION 2.3)

When configuring MOVES for the analysis, a RunSpec is developed following the
guidance in Section 2.3:
   •   From the Scale menu, selecting the "Project" domain; in addition, choosing
       output in "Inventory" so that total emissions are produced for each link (see
       Section 2.3.2).
   •   From the Time Spans Panel, the appropriate year, month, day, and hour is
       selected (see Section 2.3.3).
   •   From the Geographic Bounds Panel, the specific county is selected that contains
       the project (see Section 2.3.4).
   •   From the Vehicles/Equipment Panel, all vehicle types and fuel types (Gasoline,
       Diesel, and CNG) are selected (see Section 2.3.5).
   •   From the Road Types Panel, the Urban Unrestricted road type is selected (see
       Section 2.3.6).
   •   From the Pollutants and Processes Panel, the pollutant/processes CO Running and
       CO Crankcase Running are selected according to the guidance (see Section 2.3.7).
                                                                            30

-------
      In the Output Panel, an output database is specified with grams and miles selected
      as units (see Section 2.3.10). Population and Distance Traveled are selected as
      Activity outputs. No additional boxes are selected Output Emission Detail (some
      will be automatically checked).
3.4   ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING PROJECT DATA MANAGER
      (SECTION 2.4)

After filling out the appropriate selections in the RunSpec, the project details were
entered using the Project Data Manager.

3.4.1  Meteorology

The meteorology table was populated using the second option in Section 2.4.1 with the
average January temperature (16.1 degrees Fahrenheit) and relative humidity (80.3%).
The meteorology input table is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Meteorology Input (Average January Conditions) - Intersection
 monthID   zonelD     hourlD     temperatur relHumidity
         1    2G1G10         8       16.1         80.3
                                                                           31

-------
3.4.2   Age Distribution

The default MOVES age distribution for 2015 was used. For the purposes of this
example, the latest regional emissions analysis was assumed to have used the default
MOBILE6.2 age distribution, and since no local data was available, the MOVES default
age distribution was used for the analysis based on Section 2.4.2 of the guidance (shown
in Figure 5).

Figure 5. Fleet Age Distribution (Partial) - Intersection
 sourceTyp yearlD    agelD     ageFraction
       11     2015        0   0.071362191
       11     2015        1    0.07107502
       11     2015        2   0.071146886
       11     2015        3   0.070357165
       11     2015        4    0.06852054
       11     2015        5   0.065452453
       11     2015        6   0.064116688
       11     2015        7   0.061838426
|       11     2015        8   0.058893745
       11     2015        9   0.054935985
       11     2015        10   0.047725317
       11     2015        11    0.04225918
       11     2015        12   0.037962345
       11     2015        13   0.033661184
       11     2015        14   0.030885008
       11     2015        15   0.028873588
       11     2015        16   0.024984025
       11     2015        17   0.021668832
       11     2015        18   0.015195363
       11     2015        19   0.011894789
       11     2015        20   0.009375122
       11     2015        21   0.007629987
       11     2015        22   0.006015678
       11     2015        23   0.004322881
       11     2015        24    0.00322715
       11     2015        25   0.002695276
3.4.3   Fuels

As recommended in Section 2.4.3 of this guidance, the default MOVES fuel information
was used for the analysis (Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9).
                                                                                32

-------
Figure 6. Fuel Supply Table - Intersection
 fuelRegionID fuelYearlD monthGroLfuelFormul marketShc markets ha reCV
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
1      3213  0.962069
1      3215  0.037931
1    25005         1
1    27001         1
1    28001         1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Figure 7. Fuel Formulation Table - Intersection
fuelForniul fuelSubtyp RVP    sulfurLevel ETOHVolu MTBEVolu ETBEVolu TAMEVolu aromaticC. olefinConte benzeneCc e2QO
                                                               e30Q
     10
     20
     30
     SO
     96
     97
     98
     99
    3213
    3215
   25005
   27001
   28001
10
20
30
51
10
10
10
10
12
15
21
51
30
6.9
0
0
7.7
8.7
6.6
6.9
6.9
12.9
11.9
0
10.5
0
30
11
7.6
11
338
150
30
90
30
30
15
8
7.6
               0
               0
               0
              85
               0
               0
               0
               0
              10
              15
               0
              74
               0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
    11.7581
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26.1
0
0
0
26.4
24
26.1
26.1
20.3
18.26
0
0
0
5.6
0
0
0
119
11
5.6
5.6
6.17
4.97
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1.64
0.8
1
1
0.63
0.63
0
0
0
41.09
0
0
49.9
50
52
41.09
41.09
5736
63.59
0
49.9
0
83.09
0
0
89.5
83
84
83.09
83.09
85.11
85.58
0
89.5
0
Figure 8. Fuel Usage Fraction ~ Intersection
 countylD  fuelYearlD  modelYearsourceBinFfuelSupply usageFraction
    26161      2015          011               1
    26161      2015          022               1
    26161      2015          033               1
    26161      2015          0         5         1        0.986574
    26161      2015          055        0.013426
                                                                                      33

-------
Figure 9. Alternative Vehicle and Fuel Technology (Partial) ~ Intersection
 sourceTyp modelYearfuelTypelD engTechlDfuelEngFraction
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1973
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                                                34

-------
3.4.4  Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)

The county being modeled does not have an I/M program. The MOVES Inspection and
Maintenance Importer will not be used in this example.

3.4.5  Link Source Type

The distribution of source types was defined based on the distribution of vehicles on
arterial roads used  in the latest regional emissions analysis (see Figure 10). The
distribution used was identical for all links.

Figure 10. Link Source Type Input Table (Partial) ~ Intersection
 linkID     sourceTyp sourceTypeHourFraction
        1       11           0.007765201
        1       21           0.705029711
        1       31           0,229256275
        1       32           0.027446469
        1       41           0.000386647
        1       42            0.00022614
        1       43           0.002651314
        1       51           0.000322048
        1       52           0.016833872
        1       53           0.001936932
        1       54           0.003817565
|        1       61           0.004327825
        1       62           0.004904574
        2       11           0.007765201
        2       21           0.705029711
        2       31           0.229256275
        2       32           0.027446469
        2       41           0.000386647
        2       42            0.00022614
        2       43           0.002651314
        2       51           0.000322048
        2       52           0.016833872
        2       53           0.001936932
        2       54           0.003817565
        2       61           0.004327825
        2       62           0.004904574
                                                                                 35

-------
3.4.6  Links

The Links table was populated with the parameters of each link (shown in Figure 11).
Links 1 and 3 (free-flow approach and departure links) were assigned a link length of 300
meters (0.1875 miles), a link volume of 1000, and an average speed of 45 mph. Link 2
was assigned a link length of 50 meters (0.016 miles), a link volume of 1000, and an
average speed of 0 mph. Since no Op-Mode distribution or Link-Drive Schedule is
defined for any of the links, MOVES will calculate emission based on average speed,
road type, and grade.

Figure 11. Links Table - Intersection
 linkID    countylD  zonelD   roadTypelClinkLength linkVolumdinkAvgSptlinkDescription    linkAvgGrade
       1    26161   261610     '  5     0.25     1000      45 Approach Link              0
       2    26161   261610       5     1.200     1000      25 Queue Link                0
       3    26161   261610       5     0.25     1000      45 Departure Link              0
3.5    GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING
       (SECTION 2.5)

After running MOVES, the MOVES CO_CAL3QHC_EF post-processing script is run.
The resulting emission rates (shown in bold in Figure 12) are 2.935 grams/vehicle-mile
for the free-flow approach and departure links (Links 1 and 3) and 18.752 grams/vehicle-
hour for vehicles idling on the queue link (Link 2). These rates can be now be used in
CAL3QHC to complete this CO screening analysis.

Figure 12. Emission Rate Calculations for Each Link - Intersection
 movesRuryearld   monthld  dayld    hourld  linkld   pollutant           GramsPerGramsPerVehHour
       1    2015      1       5       8       1 CO               2.934844
       1    2015      1       5       8       2 CO                           18.75164577
       1    2015      1       5       8       3 CO               2.934844
                                                                               36

-------
Section 4: Example: Using MOVES to Calculate Start and Idle
             Emission Factors for a Transit Facility

The following is an abbreviated example of using MOVES to calculate CO emission
rates for the start and idle activity (gram/vehicle-start and gram/vehicle-hour,
respectively) for passenger vehicles associated with a park-and-ride lot serving a transit
bus facility. Although this example is for the peak (or worst-case) hour, the methodology
described for calculating start and idle emission factors could apply to both screening and
refined analyses. For illustrative purposes, the passenger vehicles are assumed to be
entirely gasoline passenger cars (source type 21). Additionally, only start and idle
emissions are considered in this example. A more realistic scenario would, of course,
also include emissions associated with the transit buses entering and exiting the facility
(in addition to the emissions from the passenger vehicles). Users should refer to Section
2 of the guidance,  as well as the intersection example in Section 3, for information on
how activity on free-flow and queue links would be defined for such a park-and-ride lot
and transit terminal.

Although a real-world project would likely be more complex, this simplified example
makes it easier to demonstrate the steps necessary to calculate emission rates using
MOVES.

The following is some pertinent data about the example project being analyzed:
   •   The analysis is of a park-and-ride lot serving a transit bus facility (see next section
       for details) located in a county in a state other than California.
   •   The analysis month and year is January 2015.
   •   Meteorological data for January at this location is 25 degrees Fahrenheit and 70%
       relative humidity.
   •   An age distribution for passenger cars is available from the latest regional
       conformity analysis.
   •   Project engineers have estimated soak times for the cars that will use the lot based
       on an analysis of similar facilities (see next section for details).
   •   There is no I/M program active in the county where the project is located.
4.1    CHARACTERIZING THE PROJECT IN TERMS OF LINKS (SECTION 2.1)

In order to calculate both a start emission factor and idle emission factor for passenger
cars, two links are defined. A single idle link (Link 1) is defined to represent idling
passenger cars.  The start emission activity from the vehicles is defined through an off-
network link (Link 2). The following traffic data is available for the peak hour of
activity:

Link 1 (Idle Link): 50 passenger cars idling - 0 mph average speed (idle)
Link 2 (Off-network Link): 100 starts during the peak hour
                                                                              37

-------
The lengths of the idle link and off-network link are set to 0 (as link length does not
matter). Also, both links have a 0% grade.

Passenger cars are estimated to have been "soaking" for greater than 720 minutes before
starting; that is, it has been more than 720 minutes since the cars have last started.

       Note: Since the goal of the MOVES run is to produce a grams/idle-hour and
       grams/vehicle-start emission rate, the exact volume of each link is not important
      for running MOVES.
4.2    DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF MOVES RUNS (SECTION 2.2)

Since this is a screening analysis, this example uses peak-hour vehicle activity in one
MOVES run to generate "worst-case" emission rates.
4.3    DETERMINE BASIC RUN SPECIFICATION INPUTS (SECTION 2.3)

When configuring MOVES for the analysis, a RunSpec is developed following the
guidance in Section 2.3:
   •   From the Scale menu, selecting the "Project" domain; in addition, choosing
       output in "Inventory" so that total emissions are produced for each link (see
       Section 2.3.2).
   •   From the Time Spans Panel, the appropriate year, month, day, and hour are
       selected (see Section 2.3.3).
   •   From the Geographic Bounds Panel, the specific county is selected that contains
       the project (see Section 2.3.4).
   •   From the Vehicles/Equipment Panel, the Gasoline Passenger Car source type
       (sourceType 21) is selected (see Section 2.3.5).
   •   From the Road Types Panel, the Off-Network and Urban Unrestricted road types
       are selected (see Section 2.3.6).
   •   From the Pollutants and Processes Panel, the pollutant/processes CO Starts, CO
       Crankcase Starts, CO Running, and CO Crankcase Running are selected
       according to the guidance (see Section 2.3.7).
   •   In the Output Panel, an output database is specified with grams and miles selected
       as units (see Section 2.3.10). Population is selected as an Activity output.  No
       additional boxes are selected Output Emission Detail (some will be automatically
       checked).
                                                                             38

-------
4.4   ENTERING PROJECT DETAILS USING PROJECT DATA MANAGER
      (SECTION 2.4)

After filling out the appropriate selections in the RunSpec, the project details were
entered using the Project Data Manager.

4.4.1  Meteorology

The meteorology table was populated using the second option in Section 2.4.1 with the
average January temperature (25 degrees Fahrenheit) and relative humidity (70%). The
meteorology input table is shown in Figure 13.

Figure 13. Meteorology Input (Average January Conditions) - Terminal

 monthID   zonelD    hourlD    temperaturrelHumidity
       1   261610        8       25         70
                                                                          39

-------
4.4.2   Age Distribution

An age distribution table was used that reflects the passenger car fleet accessing the park-
and-ride lot (see Figure 14).  In this example, the age distribution used is based on the
latest regional SIP, as discussed in Section 2.4.2 of the guidance.

Figure 14. Fleet Age Distribution (Partial) - Terminal
sourceTyp yearlD agelD ageFraction
21 2015 0 0.133990
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0.145950
0.114040
0.093500
0.066700
0.051590
0.049480
0.043290
0.033510
0.031090
0.018740
0.012660
0.013140
0.012240
0.012450
0.010690
0.020260
0.015660
0.012790
0.014070
0.017810
0.011510
0.011170
0.009270
0.007693
0.006385
4.4.3   Fuels
As recommended in Section 2.4.3 of this guidance, the default MOVES fuel information
was used for the analysis (Figures 15, 16, 17, and 18). However, the AVFT table was
changed to model an entirely gasoline fleet (fractions of 1.0 for all gasoline passenger
cars).
                                                                                40

-------
Figure 15. Fuel Supply Table — Intersection
 fuelRegionID  fuelYearlD monthGroLfuelFormul marketShc markets ha reCV
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
   270000000
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
1      3213  0.962069
1      3215  0.037931
1    25005         1
1    27001         1
1    28001         1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Figure 16.  Fuel Formulation Table — Intersection
fuelForniul fuelSubtyp RVP    sulfurLevel ETOHVolu MTBEVolu ETBEVolu TAMEVolu aromaticC. olefinConte benzeneCc e2QO
                                                               e30Q
     10
     20
     30
     SO
     96
     97
     98
     99
    3213
    3215
   25005
   27001
   28001
10
20
30
51
10
10
10
10
12
15
21
51
30
6.9
0
0
7.7
8.7
6.6
6.9
6.9
12.9
11.9
0
10.5
0
30
11
7.6
11
338
150
30
90
30
30
15
8
7.6
               0
               0
               0
              85
               0
               0
               0
               0
              10
              15
               0
              74
               0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
    11.7581
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
        0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26.1
0
0
0
26.4
24
26.1
26.1
20.3
18.26
0
0
0
5.6
0
0
0
119
11
5.6
5.6
6.17
4.97
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1.64
0.8
1
1
0.63
0.63
0
0
0
41.09
0
0
49.9
50
52
41.09
41.09
5736
63.59
0
49.9
0
83.09
0
0
89.5
83
84
83.09
83.09
85.11
85.58
0
89.5
0
Figure 17.  Fuel Usage Fraction — Intersection
 countylD  fuelYearlD modelYearsourceBinFfuelSupply usageFraction
    26161      2015         011               1
    26161      2015         022               1
    26161      2015         033               1
    26161      2015         0         5         1        0.986574
    26161      2015         055        0.013426
                                                                                      41

-------
Figure 18. Alternative Vehicle and Fuel Technology (Partial) — Intersection
 sourceTyp modelYearfuelTypelD engTechlDfuelEngFraction
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                                                42

-------
4.4.4  Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)

It was not necessary to input an I/M program since there was no program in the county
containing the project.

4.4.5  Link Source Type

A source type distribution was defined for the idle link.  All activity is from passenger
cars (sourceType 21 - see Figure 19). It is unnecessary to include the source type
distribution for the starting vehicles on the Off-Network link (Link 2); this will be
defined in the Off-Network Table (see Section 4.4.7).

Figure  19. Link Source  Type Input Table — Terminal
 linkID     sourceTyp sourceTypeHourFraction
        1        21                      1
4.4.6  Links

The Links table was populated with the parameters of each link (shown in Figure 20). To
reflect the previously described peak hour activity, Link 1 (idle link) was assigned a link
length of 0 miles, a link volume of 50, and an average speed of 0 mph.  Link 2 (off-
network link) was assigned a link length of 0 miles, a link volume of 100, and an average
speed of 0 mph.

Figure 20. Links Table - Terminal
 linkID    countylD zonelD   roadTypelD linkLength linkVolume linkAvgSpeed  linkDescription         linkAvgGrade
       1    26161  261610        5       0       50         0  Idle Link                     0
       2    26161  261610        1       0      100         0  Off-nework Link (starts)           0
4.4.7  Off-Network and Op-Mode Distribution

Information on start activity is defined through both the Off-Network and Op-Mode
Distribution tables. First, the  source type and link volume are defined in the Off-Network
Table (Figure 21) with a start  fraction of 1 (indicating that all 100 vehicles are starting
during the hour). The extended idle fraction and parked vehicle fraction are set to O.24
Figure 21. Off-Network Table
zonelD   sourceTypelD vehiclePopulation  startFraction   extendedldleFraction parkedVehicleFraction
   261610          21            100           1                0
24 Note: the "Extended Idle Fraction" field is only relevant for Long-Haul Combination Diesel Trucks. See
Section the MOVES User Guide for more information.

                                                                                   43

-------
The soak distribution (the time spent parked before starting) is defined in the Op-Mode
Distribution Table.  As noted in Section 4.1, for this specific project, all passenger cars
have been parked for greater than 720 minutes prior to starting. As shown in Figure 22,
the OpModelD corresponding to this soak time is OpModelDlOS. Start emissions for
CO come from both the start exhaust process (polProcess 202), as well as the crankcase
start process (polProcess 216). A fraction of 1 for OpModelD 108 is defined for each
pollutant process.

Figure 22. Op-Mode Distribution Table - Terminal
 sourceTyp hourDaylD linkID     polProcessopModelD opModeFraction
       21        85        2      202      108              1
       21        85        2      216      108              1
4.5    GENERATING EMISSION RATES FOR USE IN AIR QUALITY MODELING
       (SECTION 2.5)

After running MOVES, the post-processing script "CO_Grams_Per_Hour" was run on
the output database. The resulting emission rates (shown in Figure 23) are used in air
quality modeling.

Figure 23. Emission Rates for Each Link - Terminal
 movesRuryearld    monthld  hourld    linkld     pollutant            gramsPerHour
        1     2015       181 Total CO                 623.8187256
        1     2015       1       8        2 Total CO                 4709.929199
                                                                            44

-------
    Appendix A: Characterizing Intersection Projects for CO
                   Refined Analyses Using MOVES


A.1  INTRODUCTION

This appendix expands upon the discussion in Section 2.1 on how best to characterize
links when modeling an intersection project using MOVES. The MOVES emissions
model allows users to represent intersection traffic activity with a higher degree of
sophistication compared to previous models. This appendix provides several options to
describe vehicle activity to take advantage of the capabilities MOVES offers to complete
modeling for CO refined analyses of intersection projects.

Figure 24 is an example of a simple signalized intersection showing the links developed
by a project sponsor to represent the two general categories of vehicle activity expected
to take place at this intersection (approaching the intersection and departing the
intersection).

Figure 24. Example of Approach and Departure Links for a Simple Intersection
                                                         Approach Link

                                                         Departure Link
When modeling an intersection, each approach link or departure link can be modeled as
one or more links in MOVES depending on the option chosen to enter traffic activity.
                                                                           45

-------
This guidance suggests three possible options for characterizing activity on each
approach and departure link when CO refined analyses are completed (such as those
shown in Figure 24):
    •   Option 1: Using average speeds
    •   Option 2: Using link drive schedules
    •   Option 3: Using Op-Mode distributions

While Option  1 may need to be relied upon more during the initial transition to using
MOVES, as more detailed data are available to describe vehicle activity, users are
encouraged to consider using the Options 2 and 3 to take full advantage of the
capabilities of MOVES.

Once a decision has been made on how to characterize links, users should continue to
develop the remaining MOVES inputs as discussed in Section 2.4 of the guidance.
A.2   OPTION i: USING AVERAGE SPEEDS

The first option is for the user to estimate the average speeds for each link in the
intersection based on travel time and distance.  Travel time should account for the total
delay attributable to traffic signal operation, including the portion of travel when the light
is green and the portion of travel when the light is red. The effect of a traffic signal cycle
on travel time includes deceleration delay, move-up time in a queue, stopped delay, and
acceleration delay. Using the intersection example given in Figure 24, each approach
link would be modeled as one link to reflect the higher emissions associated with vehicle
idling through lower speeds affected by stopped delay; each departure link would be
modeled as one link to reflect the higher emissions  associated with vehicle acceleration
through lower speeds affected by acceleration delay.

A variety of methods are available to estimate average speed. Project sponsors determine
congested speeds by using appropriate methods based on best practices for highway
analyses.  Some resources are available through FHWA's Travel Model Improvement
Program (TMIP).25 Methodologies for computing intersection control delay are provided
in the Highway Capacity Manual.26
25 See FHWA's TMIP website: http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/.
26 Users should consult the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual. As of the release of this
guidance, the latest version is the "Highway Capacity Manual 2010," which can be obtained from the
Transportation Research Board (see http://hcm.trb.org/?qr=l for details).

                                                                                46

-------
A.3   OPTION 2: USING LINK DRIVE SCHEDULES
A more refined approach is to enter vehicle activity into MOVES as a series of link drive
schedules to represent individual segments of cruise, deceleration, idle, and acceleration
of a congested intersection. A link drive schedule defines a speed trajectory to represent
the entire vehicle fleet via second-by-second changes in speed and highway grade.
Unique link drive schedules can be defined to describe types of vehicle activity that have
distinct emission rates, including cruise, deceleration, idle, and acceleration.

Figure 25 illustrates why using this more refined approach can result in a more detailed
emissions analysis.  This figure shows the simple trajectory of a single vehicle
approaching an intersection during the red  signal phase of a traffic light cycle. This
trajectory is characterized by several distinct phases (a steady cruise speed, decelerating
to a stop for the red light, idling during the red signal  phase, and accelerating when the
light turns green). In contrast, the trajectory of a single vehicle approaching an
intersection during the green signal phase of a traffic light cycle is characterized by a
more or less steady cruise speed through the intersection.

Figure 25.  Example Single Vehicle Speed Trajectory Through a Signalized
Intersection
       -100    -80     -60    -40     -20     0      20

                                       Distance (m)
                                                         40
                                                                 60
                                                                        80
                                                                              100
For the example intersection in Figure 24, link drive schedules representing the different
operating modes of vehicle activity on the approach and departure links can be
determined. For approach links, the length of a vehicle queue is dependent on the
number of vehicles subject to stopping at a red signal.  Vehicles approaching a red traffic

                                                                                47

-------
signal decelerate over a distance extending from the intersection stop line back to the
stopping distance required for the last vehicle in the queue.  The average stopping
distance can be calculated from the average deceleration rate and the average cruise
speed.  Similarly, for the departure links, vehicles departing a queue when the light turns
green accelerate over a distance extending from the end of the vehicle queue to the
distance required  for the first vehicle to reach the cruise speed, given the rate of
acceleration and cruise speed. Figure 26 provides an illustration of how the different
vehicle operating modes may be apportioned spatially near this signalized intersection.

Figure 26. Example Segments of Vehicle Activity Near a Signalized Intersection
                                                              Decelerate
                                                              Idle
                                                              Accelerate
                                                              Cruise
There are other considerations with numerous vehicles stopping and starting at an
intersection over many signal cycles during an hour.  For instance, heavy trucks
decelerate and accelerate at slower rates than passenger cars. Drivers tend not to
decelerate at a constant rate, but through a combination of coasting and light and heavy
braking.  And acceleration rates are initially higher when starting from a complete stop at
an intersection, becoming progressively lower to make a smooth transition to cruise
speed.

In the case of an uncongested intersection, the rates of vehicles approaching and
departing the intersection are in equilibrium.  Some vehicles may slow, and then speed up
to join the dissipating queue without having to come to a full stop.  Once the queue
clears,  approaching vehicles during the remainder of the green phase of the cycle will
cruise through the intersection virtually unimpeded.

In the case of a congested intersection, the rate of vehicles approaching the intersection is
greater than the rate of departure, with the result that no vehicle can travel through
without stopping; vehicles approaching the traffic signal, whether it is red or green, will
have to come to a full stop and idle for one or more cycles before departing the
                                                                                 48

-------
intersection. The latest Highway Capacity Manual is a good source of information for
vehicle operation through signalized intersections.

The emission factors obtained from MOVES for each segment of vehicle activity
obtained via individual link drive schedules  are readily transferable to air quality models.

      Note: For both free-flow highway and intersection links, users may directly enter
      output from traffic simulation models in the form of second-by-second individual
      vehicle trajectories.  These vehicle trajectories for each road segment can be
      input into MOVES using the Link Drive Schedule Importer and defined as unique
      LinklDs.  There are no limits in MOVES as to how many links can be defined;
      however, model run times increase as the user defines more links.  A
      representative sampling of vehicles can be used to model higher volume segments
      by adjusting the resulting sum of emissions to account for the higher traffic
      volume. For example, if a sampling  of 5,000 vehicles (5,000 links) was used to
      represent the driving patterns of 150,000 vehicles over an hour, then the sum of
      emissions would be adjusted by a factor of 30 to account for the higher traffic
      volume (i.e., 150,000 vehicles/5,000  vehicles).  Since the vehicle trajectories
      include idling, acceleration, deceleration, and cruise, separate roadway links do
      not have to be explicitly defined to show changes in driving patterns.  The sum of
      emissions from each vehicle trajectory  (LinkID) adjusted to represent the full
      vehicle count over an hour represents the total emission contribution of a given
      road segment.
A. 4   OPTION 3: USING OP-MODE DISTRIBUTIONS

A third option is for a user to generate representative Op-Mode distributions for approach
and departure links by calculating the fraction of fleet travel times spent in each mode of
operation. For any given signalized intersection, vehicles are cruising, decelerating,
idling, and accelerating. Op-Mode distributions can be calculated from the ratios of
individual mode travel times to total travel times on approach links and departure links.
This type of information could be obtained from Op-Mode distribution data from (1)
existing intersections with similar geometric and operational (traffic) characteristics,  or
(2) output from traffic simulation models for the proposed project or similar projects.

The following methodology describes a series of equations to assist in calculating vehicle
travel times on approach and departure links.  Note that a single approach and single
departure link should be defined to characterize vehicles approaching, idling at, and
departing an intersection (e.g., there is no need for an "idling link," as vehicle idling  is
captured as part of the approach link).
                                                                                49

-------
A. 4.1  Approach links

When modeling each approach link, the fraction of fleet travel times in seconds (s) in
each mode of operation should be determined based on the fraction of time spent
cruising, decelerating, accelerating, and idling:

       Total Fleet Travel Time (s) = Cruise Time + Decel Time + Accel Time +
              Idle Time

The cruise travel time can be represented by the number of vehicles cruising multiplied
by the length of approach divided by the average cruise speed.

       Cruise Time (s) = Number of Cruising Vehicles * (Length of Approach (mi) +
              Average Cruise Speed (mi/hr)) * 3600 s/hr

The deceleration travel time can be represented by the number of vehicles decelerating
multiplied by the average cruise speed divided by the average deceleration rate:

       Decel Time (s) = Number of Decelerating Vehicles * (Average Cruise Speed
              (mi/hr) + Average Decel Rate (mi/hr/s))

The acceleration travel time occurring on an approach link can be similarly represented.
However, to avoid double counting acceleration activity that occurs on the departure link,
users should multiply the acceleration time by the proportion of acceleration that occurs
on the approach link (Accel Length Fraction on Approach):

       Accel Time (s) = Number of Accelerating Vehicles * (Average Cruise Speed
              (mi/hr) + Average Accel Rate (mi/hr/s)) * Accel Length Fraction on
              Approach

The idle travel time can be represented by the number of vehicles idling multiplied by the
average stopped delay (average time  spent stopped at an intersection):

       Idle Time (s) = Number of Idling Vehicles * Average Stopped Delay (s)

Control delay (total  delay caused by an intersection) may be used in lieu of average
stopped delay, but control delay includes decelerating and accelerating travel times,
which should be subtracted out (leaving only idle time).

After calculating the fraction of time spent in each mode of approach activity, users
should select the appropriate MOVES Op-Mode  corresponding to each particular type of
activity (see Section 2.4.8 for more information). The operating modes in MOVES
typifying approach links include:
    •   Cruise/acceleration (OpModelD 11-16, 22-25, 27-30, 33, 35, 37-40);
    •   Low and moderate speed coasting (OpModelD 11,21); and
    •   Idling (OpModelD 1)

                                                                               50

-------
The relative fleet travel time fractions can be allocated to the appropriate Op-Modes in
MOVES.  The resulting single Op-Mode distribution accounts for relative times spent in
the different driving modes (cruise, deceleration, acceleration, and idle) for the approach
link.

A. 4.2  Departure links

When modeling each departure link, the fraction of fleet travel times spent in each mode
of operation should be determined based on the fraction of time spent cruising and
accelerating:

       Total Fleet Travel Time (s) = Cruise Time + Accel Time

The cruise travel time can be represented by the number of vehicles cruising multiplied
by the travel distance divided by the average cruise speed:

       Cruise Time (s) = Number of Cruising Vehicles * (Length of Departure (mi)) /
              (Average Cruise Speed (mi/hr)) * 3600 s/hr

The acceleration travel time occurring during the departure link can be represented by the
number of vehicles accelerating multiplied by the average cruise speed divided by the
average acceleration rate. However, to  avoid double counting acceleration activity that
occurs on the approach link, users should multiply the resulting acceleration time by the
proportion of acceleration that occurs on the departure link (Accel Length Fraction on
Departure):

       Accel Time (s) = Number of Accelerating Vehicles * (Average Cruise Speed
              (mi/hr) + Average Accel Rate (mi/hr/s)) *  Accel  Length Fraction on
              Departure

After calculating fraction of time spent  in each mode of departure activity, users should
select the  appropriate MOVES Op-Mode corresponding to each particular type of activity
(see Section 2.4.8 for more information). The operating modes  typifying departure links
include:
    •   Cruise/acceleration (OpModelD 11-16, 22-25, 27-30, 33, 35, 37-40)

The relative fleet travel time fractions can be allocated to the appropriate Op-Modes. The
resulting single Op-Mode distribution accounts for relative times spent in the different
driving modes (cruise and acceleration) for the departure  link.
                                                                                51

-------