Upper Columbia River
Expanded Site Inspection Report
Ac C™*1*"
Northeast Washington
TDD: 01-024)028,
Contract:
October^
Region 10
Siipernind Technical Assessment and Response Team
Submitted To: Monica Tonel, Task Monitor
United States Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
-------
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION REPORT
NORTHEAST WASHINGTON
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section „,-., Pa
1.
INTRODUCTION ^ fv^""-^ J'1
2 BACKGROUND $?? ££&!£":£*: s, 2-1
2.1 REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND DESCRIPTIONS,-. . . /^•,J$^.j. ..... 2-1
2.2 PHYSICAL SETTING ?^? -J^-- '*V-.i>'.,5*."f'V..... 2-2
2.2.1 Regional Land Management ?^^%'^f>' ^Y^'"f•>-'/•' • • • 2-3
2.3 OPERATIONS AND WASTE CHARACTER^^». ?^T 2-4
2.3.1 Mining and Milling 2-4
2.3.2 Smelters 2-5
2.3.2.1 Former Le Roi/Northport Smelter •^^^^||v'- 2-5
2.3.2.1.1 Smelter Desc^^^'eatures 2-6
2.3.2.2 Cominco SmeUepff'. $*. 2-8
2.3.3 Pulp Industry ... jjjf. ffi... 2-12
2.3.4 Other PotentiakSo/rces of (Jpntarninatigp f 2-14
2.4
PREVIOUS INVESTMTIONS.^ &. 2-14
A'Wv' yfe > ^.JjK
3. FIELD ACTIVITIES AND^AN^YTICAI^QIOSQJ:' 3-1
3-3
3-3
Dratory Program Sediment Sampling 3-4
3.3 ^GLl^.A^PpSrrio^G^SYSTEM 3-5
3.4 ^EjgJPt|ffi|^pEc6N|^MINATION AND INVESTIGATION-DERIVED
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 4-1
.*• / 4.1 LABORATORY ANALYSES 4-1
'."• 42 QA/QC SAMPLES 4-2
4.3 DATA VALIDATION 4-2
4.4 SATISFACTION OF DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES . 4-2
4.4.1 Precision and Accuracy 4-2
4 4.2 Completeness 4-3
4.4.3 Representativeness 4-3
444 Comparability ... . . 4-3
4 5 LABORATORY AND FIELD QA/QC PARAMETERS 4-3
4 5 1 Holding Times ... 4-3
452 Initial and Continuing Calibration 4-4
10START-2\01020028\S772 1
-------
Section
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
4.5 3 Laboratory Blanks
4.5 4 Trip and Rinsate Blanks
5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORTING AND BACKGROUND SAMPLES
5.1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA
DATA PRESENTATION .'-.
5.2
5.3
Page
. 4-4
4-4
. 5-1
. 5-1
. 5-2
BACKGROUND SEDIMENT .;.. ...;^f%>. 5-2
5.3.1 Background Sample Location and Description . fV^st^ffl^.^. 5-3
5.T7 Rflrkcn-nimH Samnlincr Mp.thnH £$?'" ?iSit®&?M> S-1
5.3.2 Background Sampling Method
5.3.3 Background Sample Laboratory Anajfis .$'... ... v :5-3
c:
5.3.4 DataQuality .J6$. . :. . .^7 5-4
5.3.5 Background Sediment Sample AnalyMJ&&esjuits ^fS^fef.1'.. 5-4
6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6-1
6.1 SAMPLE LOCATIONS 6-1
6.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS f. 6-1
7. TARGETS/RECEPTORS SURFACE WATER;]
7.1 SURFACE WATER MIGRATI^PXl
J$
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.. $'.. ..TfffiSSP^ 8-1
9. REFERENCES
9-1
10START-2\01020028\S772
-------
LIST OF APPENDICES'
A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PETITION
B LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
C SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN SEDIMENT AND SURFACE WATER
SAMPLES
D FIGURES DEPICTING DATA RESULTS OF ARSENIC, CADMIUM, COPPER, LEAD,
MERCURY, AND ZINC IN TRIBUTARY SEDIMENT SAMPLES •$-£.$. c'y"
E PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION ^.- ^Wf|-%
F FIELD SAMPLE RECORD FORMS &
G SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED AND
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY ASSUlS^teASD QUALITY
ANALYSIS *.•«,***..
H GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM COORDINATES^
-^
I DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW MEMORANDA^^gJl^ALYTICAL DATA
FORMS (COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT S^S^RESULfs^^.IffiTALS ONLY. ALL
OTHERS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST?!IMS%'^ " ^^?"
,/^>**'"^i«%x A"'
J EPA'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSIOlf?TO CONBf|lS4M5^tNG IN CANADA
K CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS A$D DATA >yALIDATI§N:REPORTS RELATING TO THE
SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLEj^HED FROMloWER IMbw LAKE DURING THE
ECOLOGY 2001 SAMPlJI^jpSNT jf' $
L GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATiION
af-~
!.£$£«&-'»
" * 7 . * ^ s J-
Ajijrv,**^:^ y&z - , i,v j ,/^ »•;,
/.^Wtpir 'jfe*
^
10START-2\OI020028\S772 111
-------
Note This page is
intentionally left blank
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table
2-1
3-1
5-1
6-1
Page
Washington State Department of Ecology 2001 Sampling Event Comparison of Metals in Lake
Roosevelt Sediments to FSQVs and Consensus-Based TECs for Freshwater Sediments . 2-17
Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Summary Table > ' 3-6
TW s.'j, * •<
Upper Columbia River Analytical Methods, Reporting Limits, and Laboratories 5-5
Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Analytical Results'Data Summary v. 6-3
10 START-2\01020028\S772
-------
Note. This page is
intentionally left blank
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
2-1 Lake Roosevelt Drainage Basin 2-18
2-2 Upper Columbia River Vicinity Map 2-19
2-3 Le Roi/Northport Smelter Sample Location Map • 2-20
2-4 Columbia River Teck Cominco Study Area / ';.'-. -: ,• ?'*•••.• ^-22
3-1 Overview of Samples Collected from the Upper Columbia River Project Areajt;^.:^1,.,. 3-9
6-1 Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Results-Arsefaiq^ Cadmium, Copper, Le^d,"Mercury,
and Zinc (Samples CS004 to CS023) -w|P$f- ^M^... 6-11
\»*rfi*'vi!2& J* J*C 5-
6-2 Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Results-Arsei|ic^Gadiniurn, Copper, Lead, Mercury,
and Zinc (Samples CS024 to CS052) ^'^^^"W 6"13
8-1 Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Significant/Elevated Sopper^esults (Samples CS004
to CS023) -^1f^"• 8'5
8-2 Upper Columbia River Sediment Samp}eJSigniric^Ke^te^ Copj^r Results (Samples CS025
8-3 Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample Significant/Eleyjited Lead Results (Samples CS004 to
8-4 Upper Columbia River Sediment Sample'Significant/Elevated Lead Results (Samples CS025 to
CS052) _4 $' ,;''>j.. -#- 8-11
.fa -^M* ^il^fJi^'
8-5 Uppef-jGolumbia RiyeE,S£dirhent Sample.^ignificant/Elevated Zinc Results (Samples CS004 to
*<.* VJtAWi^ar^ •^JB^eofevl^iSti^^ ", '\&s'*'j3'"* *•
"
8-13
8-6 UppeJi^Coliinib|a River SiSiiinent^Sample Significant/Elevated Zinc Results (Samples CS025 to
CS052) -^Jp%,f, ^Si-^v: 8-15
10START-2\01020028\S772 Vll
-------
Note This page is
intentionally left blank
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Definition
above mean sea level
British Columbia
Bureau of Reclamation v.. r •'
< v *- . . i ''
Celgar Pulp Company •--."•/..i^t
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability:Act of 1980
Contract Laboratory Program ' " ' \' ,
contaminants of concern
Teck Cominco, Ltd.
Contract Required Detection Limit _/j>?
Contract Required Quantitation Limit ^M^
Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs anctflnternationai Trade
di^'*^'^Jijl^f£&*
United States Department of Oipuiterior^^$"
•f&V ,rs 'fa&r.jSSfMbt&s •
j.\
data quality objectives
•>w
Ecology and Environrnentglnc.
Washington State Deipartment of Ecology
A '
. \s-
Acronyn
AMSL
BC.
BOR
Celgar
CERCLA
CLP
COCs
Cominco
CRDL
CRQL
DFAIT
DOI
DQOs
E&E
Ecology
EPA
ESI
GPS
HRS
ro
row * investigation-derived waste
IJC International Joint Commission
kg/d ' kilograms per day
Lake Roosevelt Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake
LRWQC Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council
MEL Manchester Environmental Laboratory
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram
MHW mean high water
MRL method reporting limit
' t .-Global PositioningJystem
Hazard Ranking System/-?:^
,.>?n*} P-J
10 START-2\01020028\S772
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS (CONTINUED)
Acronyn Definition
MS matrix spike
MSD matrix spike duplicate
NCA North Creek Analytical
NPS National Park Service
NPL National Priorities List
PA preliminary assessment
PCBs polychlormated biphenyls
pesticide chlorinated pesticide
QA quality assurance
QC quality control
percent recovery
river mile
relative percent difference
Superfund Amendmentsaan.!&-
TSiJift S-JSi'S^ W
S*t'¥«K*«P.^'»3«''» T^ «•
rechnical|D>ire.ctipn Document
target distancejimit" *
total organic carbon
United States
United States Geological Survey
"' volatile organic compounds
Roy F Weston, Inc.
Washington State Department of Health
10 START-2\01020028\S772
-------
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION REPORT
NORTHEAST WASHINGTON
1. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund Technical
Assessment and Response Team (START)-2 Contract Nos. 68-SO;-01-01 and '68-80^01-02,
Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E & E) and Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON) conducted,an expanded site
inspection (ESI) of sediment contamination in the upper Columbia River arid its triblutones^frpm the -.'
United States (U.S.)-Canada border downstream to approximately river mile (RM) 675'near Inchelium,
Washington. _ v^'^Y^^-s,
The ESI, under the authority of the Comprehensive Enj/ironmenjSi;Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and-Jlea^pnzation Act of 1986
(SARA), is intended to collect sufficient data to detw^he%sit£s potentia\'fprinclusion on the National
Priorities List (NPL) and establish priorities for^ddihonalfal^on^i^wan'anfejd. The assessment process
does not include extensive or complete site characterization, co|ifar^ai)t''fate determination, or
quantitative risk assessment. .&$/ -'* /v?
^!> J"**£ » f ""
The EPA assessment of hazarapus substance contamination in the upper Columbia River area
was conducted in response to a/ormal PrelimiparyjAssessment (PA) Petition submitted by the
ConfederatedJ'Tribes of the-G^i|j|idian ReservSiof under Section 105(d) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §
9605(d)." A'c'o'pytof'the PA Petidpn,dated August 2, 1999, is provided in Appendix A. Under the
authority of CERCl;A,arid SARAl'-the'EPA completed a PA of the upper Columbia River, from the
U.S.-Canada borde|ytoj|ie/,!Grand Coule^Dam (E & E 2000). The PA, which is the first phase in the site
ftf?** '^%tti|^,. "
'
,.
assessment'process was 'completed, in December of 2000, and included an evaluation of information and
data from previous studies. 'Based on the findings of the upper Columbia River PA, the EPA determined
" i-
-------
contamination to the upper Columbia River, including visits to 60 mines and mills in Stevens County and
Pend Oreille County, Washington, were conducted by E & E under TDD Nos 01-02-0028 and
01-08-0009, respectively.
A summary of findings and recommendations for each of the 39 mine and mill sites visited in
Stevens County, Washington, can be found in the Upper Columbia River Mines and Mills Preliminary
Assessments and Site Inspections Report (E & E 2002a). A summary of findings and recommendations
for each of the 21 mine and mill sites visited in Pend Oreille County, Washington; can be found in the
Lower Pend Oreille River Mines and Mills Preliminary Assessments'and Site^Jnspec^iqns Report
(E&E2002b). |/j,/ &}'' '^i^'li^, , .-
This document presents the objectives, sampling actiyjtjes, and, results of the se'iiine^ntCampling
event conducted by WESTON in the upper Columbia River, ''inSIudechare background information
llpwlix-
(Section 2), field activities and analytical protocol (Section 3^fqu'4l}|y^|^rance (QA)Xquality control
(QC; Section 4), analytical results reporting and background samplestSj^iipq^j^analytical results
(Section 6), the targets/receptors in the surface water^mgr^i^vpathway (S|ctioji'7), conclusions and
recommendations (Section 8), and references i
10 START-2\01020028\S772
1-2
-------
2. BACKGROUND
This ESI was intended to collect sufficient data to support a hazard ranking system (MRS)
evaluation of the upper Columbia River and to assess the need fonadditional Ide'tailed-investigation and/or
"-1-V i< 2'f *-"K irjl
»!, (<•»*> '*"'! ' f'-SJ V' '&'.'•
response action Accordingly, the sampling objectives defineddfor.the upper Golumbia'^River ESI are to:
M^ ^"^Vs;'>(£«.'V>
' '
Document a threat or potential threat to publjp^palthjj^he environmentfpqs^|tby'
sediment contamination in the upper Colum!?'"1**"^*"' vfe.'te*
Assess the need for additional detailed investigatfo^^p/or response action in the upper
_, . , . r>. j *&*'" ^KwMPrAO.*.,
Columbia River; and
Determine the potential for placement a
A sampling and quality assurance planj
WESTON in the upper Columbia River wa^Sevelope
ia-River site on the NPL
Lpnor
vities to be conducted by
ement of field work
(WESTON 200la). The SQAP descri^Mie sampling strategyjsampling methodology, and analytical
program to be used to investigate seSiment contamination it^the upper Columbia River
J&. £" y\j jfM*4.»t.. j^*HrtJ'
2.1
IjQSAL C
STICS%NiM)ESCRiPTIONS
TheCplumbia,,River fldw^fjromlio/triern British Columbia (B.C.), Canada, generally south
through eastern Washington, and then;west;* forming part of the border between Washington and Oregon,
and eventuay.y^femptying|into,l|ie,Pacific',8cean. The Columbia River is the principal inflow to Franklin
D. Roosevelt Lake (Lake Roosevelt)'and contributes about 90% of the flow from a large drainage area in
Canada and the U S In addition to the Columbia River, four other major rivers flow directly into Lake
Roosevelt: the Kettle, Colyille, Spokane and San Poil rivers. The Pend Oreille River flows into the main
stem of the Columbia River just north of the U S.-Canada border. (Figure 2-1; USGS 1994) The portion
of the river addressed in this report, and referred to as the upper Columbia River, extends approximately
70 RMs through northeast Washington from the U.S.-Canada border to approximately RM 675 near
Inchelium, Washington, crossing portions of both Ferry and Stevens counties (Figure 2-2)
In 1942, construction of the Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia River was completed by the
U S Department of the Interior (DOI) Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to supply irrigation water, provide
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-1
-------
flood control, and produce hydroelectric power (E & E 2000) The portion of the Columbia River from
the dam upstream to the Northport area (approximately 135 RMs) is referred to as Lake Roosevelt
Reservoir (E & E 2000). The reservoir developed into a major recreational and economic resource for
the surrounding area (E & E 2000). The Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area, comprising the lake
and its shorelines, attracts more than 1 million visitors per year (E & E 2000). The National Recreation
Area ends south of Northport at Onion Creek. The distance from Grand CouleeJDam to .Onion Creek is
-•/" ,'.""'*
approximately 132 miles (DOE 2000). Recreational activities include boating^s^irrariing, fishing, and
camping (E & E 2000). fij^*
In spring and early summer, substantial fluctuations injake levels can occuSSirfieidegree of
r ° J ••**&• .< - ^SpaV^S^?-' , •
•*
drawdown is based on snowmelt predictions. The normal pgerating range on the lake isjbejtween .*
'^^'ifjfci&f' " v;ViL'
1,290 feet above mean sea level (AMSL; full pool) to 1,208
2.2 PHYSICAL SETTING
The Colville Indian Reservation borders'.
93 RMs. North and west of Lake Roosevelt, thejerrain
amount of farmland. The area is thinly populated,
>S«t.--'»A f XA.!fl itiSTiteitauu*' '
. ."WSWWT-'
is a mixtures!}f(
*
nonj^s(aii(l'west for approximately
3^;'"'
and-mostly forested, with a small
^^>*
ps'per square mile. The are is
. Logging and mining dominate
- u >
products manufacjunng*dj)niinates^^e^conbrny The area south of Lake Roosevelt and the Spokane
m
•wjW *< *3j»i>,
Dllmg rails? The population density is 4.2 persons per square mile, and
'*fc 'w*
agriculture';is"the main liWiriocl?^(DOI 2000)
r
-'The upper Columbia Rive¥Gorge, where Lake Roosevelt is located, spans three distinct
physiographic provinces: the Okanogan Highlands, the Kootenay Arc, and the Columbia Plateau. During
thejast ice age, glaciers'descended from the north and gouged out large valleys and canyons. Huge lakes
were formed when ice dammed rivers and streams When the ice dams collapsed, floods scoured the
rt -y ^ , ' C , * -Jl
landscape, creating the channeled scablands of the Columbia Plateau and the Grand Coulee. (DOI2000)
From the north, the Columbia River generally follows the boundary of the Okanogan Highlands
on the west and the Kootenay Arc on the east The rocks within the Kootenay Arc were originally ocean
bottom sediments that were deposited in a trench formed as part of a subduction zone where the North
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-2
-------
American continent overrode the Pacific Plate. Lake Roosevelt is contained within a fairly narrow gorge
for most of this distance, and it retains much of the character of a large river rather than a lake. In the
upper stretches of Lake Roosevelt, there is often an observable current due to the high river flow.
(DOI 2000)
The Columbia River runs north to south for most of its length. Just south of the Spokane Arm,
the river turns west where it meets the flood basalts of the Columbia Plateau. Here, massive outpourings
of lava forced the river to change its course and form a large loop,arpund the nprtrrand west extent of the
plateau. Basalts were deposited over granite and were uncoveir&d!rjy''the ice age flpods.'jln this Lincoln
County area, the Columbia River also borders the north end of(the Palous,e,.Hills, wqer^bjasalts of the,-
Columbia Plateau have been buried by wind-blown soils knp.wji!asjpe(ss': Large areas wgiip^hjghienough
to be unaffected by the ice age floods, and the resulting deep sp.Hs|prpVide valuable agricultural land.
The landscape in this area is mainly rolling cultivated hills. (f^J^pQ^^^ s
Toward the Grand Coulee Dam, the river meanders\nd flows^njiqstjxiirectly north. During the
'*$Sllil
-------
Tribe of Indians, and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, confirms the roles and
areas of management responsibility on Lake Roosevelt for the various parties. In addition to delineating
management responsibilities, the agreement recognized the Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area as
an existing unit of the National Park system (DOI 2000). A copy of the existing Lake Roosevelt
Cooperative Management Agreement is provided in Appendix B
-- f
The Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council (LRWQC), which includesjmembe^lfrom federal,
/'^'f'^ ^'f
state, and local governments; the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation; the Spokane
^w,~ Ip^ttgPP,-?-- r
Tribe of Indians; citizen groups; and individuals, was formed u$9wto addretsjp^iiiitpource poll
<-: *• ^V ^, *%&%? Vc£
^ ,
coming out of Canada directly impacting Lake Roosevelt. The.LRWQC deyelopeH
&\ ,-7 F
and continues with the coordination of water quality and air quality studi
L»j»A*SflV.X,.S?.s7*
ution •
Plan
"
2.3 OPERATIONS AND WASTE CHARACTERS
leafed elevated levels of
Previous studies carried out on the upper Columbia River Basi
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc in sedime^^md^isl^m^Lake Ro6's|feJ[f'land the upper reach of
«5^*
fish tissue also have been
the Columbia River. Mercury levels i
documented. Previous studies have found elfvated levelifof pol'^ilQnnated biphenyls (PCBs),
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, and>^^chlorinap3 dibenzofprans in water, sediment, and fish
samples collected from the upper Cotomma RiverWE & E 2000)
J»lr JP- ?tfy
Sources of contamination that have coritnbuted!.|ofthis contamination include mining and milling
operationysmejting operad^^^ilJEKand pape'rapio^<:tton, sewage treatment plants, and other industrial
activities.xTKtse^^ntaminanCspurces^are summarized in the following sections.
2.3.1 Minii
'/$• -sa:-y«--.>w
Numerous miningSid milling operations along the tributaries feeding the upper Columbia River
in the U'S. and in Canada havej)ccurred since the late 1800s. Although claims were staked earlier,
development of resources jri the area did not become economically feasible until approximately the
189Qs, when ore concentration processes were developed Ores were concentrated in mills built at or
close to each mine* 'significantly reducing transportation costs. Concentrated ores were transported to
smeltersYorTfurther refining. Large amounts of ore process wastes containing arsenic, cadmium, copper,
^"jv.' v •.' " .f
lead, mercury, and zinc were produced during these operations. (E & E 2000)
The Northport area was comprised mostly of lead-zinc mines (Ecology 2000). Low-grade lead
and zinc ore concentration processes involved physical crushing, pulverizing, and classifying using a
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-4
-------
stream of water, followed by a flotation process. Flotation was accomplished by adding reagents to the
fines and then skimming off the resulting concentrated metals Reagents used in this process included
pine oil, cresylic acid, alcohols, eucalyptus oils, coal tar (wood creosotes), flotation reagents, xanthates,
thiocarbonilides, lime soda ash, copper sulfate, sodium cyanide, and sodium silicate. The cleaned
concentrate then was dried on a vacuum filter and sent to a smelter for refining. (Orlob 1950)
Mine and mill sites identified by the EPA as potential sources of contamination to tributaries that
discharge to the upper Columbia River were visited as part of the^ESI. A summaiy\of the findings and
recommendations for each of the mine and mill sites visited in,Steveris and Pend Qreille'counties,
Washington, are presented in separate reports (E & E 2002a; E?& E 2000). >y V $$$jj%'<;f-
2.3.2 Smelters —- "'<^
Smelters in the vicinity of the upper Columbia River, wateredincilude the former
Le Roi/Northport Smelter in Northport, Washington, and the Teck
<,rr. -, ~W^rM.'£«.»
Trail, B.C.
, .- .'•HMSg^y-iv
2.3.2.1 Former Le Roi/Northport Smelter*^
Mf? jf>
The Le Roi/Northport Smelter isjd-former smelter locate$Fnortheast of the town center of
Northport, Washington, along High\v1ijriS5. The,city of Northjpdrt is located along the east bank of the
Columbia River approximately^ miles south of^thepLLSj-Ganada border in Stevens County. (URS 1993)
The^prthport-Watfeti|Roaa,borders tneflt^^i/Northport Smelter site along the south and east.
ie('B;bi/Northport Smelter site along i
Highway 25,Qefinestthe westemjboUndary of the site. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway
*%ilp.\ ^!$^..
(formerly the Spptam?,]Balls and Nof)hern;Railroad) runs parallel to the Columbia River and designates
*< f f, i" ,* -? ^ " i i *
the northern sitejb§ira^fity^jrhe Columbja River is located approximately 200 feet north of the
''" "*' "" * '
. ,
Le Roi/Northport Smelter property. Properties west of the site are residential homes. Smelter Hill is
located directly east of the site and Silver Crown Mountain is south of the site. A city park with an area
of approximately 10 acres is located northwest of the site along the Columbia River, approximately
50 feet from the site The park is accessed by means of a road on the southwest corner of the site.
(Figure 2-1; URS 1993)
The property encompasses approximately 32 acres and is accessed from the Northport-Waneta
Road via Highway 25 (SAIC 1997) Access to the Le Roi/Northport Smelter site is not restricted
(URS 1993). The ground surface generally slopes toward the Columbia River in elevation from about
1,360 feet AMSL at the site to 1,290 feet AMSL, the normal pool elevation for the Columbia River
10START-2\01020028\S772 2-5
-------
(SAIC 1997). The former smelter buildings, which are no longer standing, included the furnace building,
the roaster building, and the crusher and ore building (Heritage 1981) v '
In the 1890s, a flurry of mining activities evolved in northeastern Washington and southern B C.
In 1892, D.C. Corbin, owner of the Spokane Falls and Northern Railroad, built a rail line to reach the
town of Northport, then consisting of a lumber mill and several tents The railroad tracks were located
adjacent to the Le Roi site. In 1896, Mr Corbin donated the site to the Le Roi Mining and Smelting
Company for the construction of a smelter called Breen Copper Smelter. The srrieiter'location was
chosen because the area contained large quantities of materialsjnecessary for smelting",'Such as limerock
and flux. (URS 1993) jjjf y>" ""4^^^- - 5'
In 1896, the Breen Copper Smelter began refining cqpper^andjgold ores from rhin&s'ijf.nprtheast
Washington, as well as copper ore from B.C. for the Le Roi Min^g and Smelting Company*(Northport
Pioneers 1981). In 1901, the Le Roi Company Smelting OperationsVeorgahized with the Red Mountain
W
Smelting Operations to become the Northport Smelting and'Refining @pjnpany^(yRS 1993). By 1908, it
was one of the largest smelters on the West Coast, propessu^iSOO tons of qre^per"day (URS 1993). In
1909, the smelter closed because of competitionjfjom anolhefismelter located in Trail, B.C. (URS 1993).
During World War I, the government demandJfor lead encoura'ge^l|&^N'drthport Mining and Smelting
Company to reopen and process the lead;pres that had'-been discovered at Leadpoint, Washington, /*"\
approximately 9 miles east of Northpjor|;(URS 1993). In September 1914, Jerome Day purchased the
smelter and renovated it to accpmodjjte lead or§s JU]E^Se^993). The government curtailed its lead
-, K, '*
puchases in/192'1, and subseqiientlypthe smelter'plo'sea-and was dismantled in 1922, after 24 years of
"*»•*'
,,
sporadic opferatlbn (E.& E 2000)SMter,the smelter closed, the American Smelting and Refining
^ff£"J\^ "%SS;;i,
Company purcha^edJtKe^ite. The^c^pMiy^removed the smelting equipment and transported it to a
smelter elsewhereT€URS€993). Sometirfie^between 1922 and 1953, the inactive site was purchased by
J.D. Harms'. -"Between 1953 and ,1969, a lumber mill went into operation on the property (URS 1993). In
' "* ^V.jvj fv*S^ ' ^ » "••
,'••. >vf :%•&?>.>
1975, Cecil Frazier purchased the'property and operated a lumber mill (URS 1993) In 1985, Steve
Frazier purchased the property and business and operated the lumber mill under the name SSF Building
Materials until the property was sold in 2001 to KES Contracting, Trail, B.C., the current owner.
2.3.2.1.1 -Smelter Description/Features
The Breen Copper Smelter treated copper and gold ores transported from the Rossland Mine
located in B.C. The initial smelter operations were rudimentary and involved releases of large quantities
of pollutants The tellurium ore was difficult to process, however, it contained high enough amounts of _^
10 START-2\01020028\S772 2-6
-------
copper and gold to make the process worthwhile Tellurium is naturally occurring and belongs to the
same family of elements as sulfur and selenium. Because of the tellurium, the ore had to be burned or
heated to release the minerals. The burning released high amounts of sulfur dioxide into the air.
(URS 1993)
The copper and gold ore was processed by heap roasting, which involves open burning of the raw
ore prior to placing it in a mineral filtration furnace. A slag brick platform was utilized for the initial
burning, or heap roasting, of the ore. The ore was piled on the brick platform to.an"approximate depth of
4 feet. Cord wood was then stacked on top of the ore pile and,i§nited. The tellunuin ih;the ore vaporized
during this process, thus freeing the gold and copper for smelting. The Ngftfport'clt;!pvell|^re currently
located on the brick platform area. (URS 1993) ,^~ '^^fif^^'
The burned ore was then placed into the furnace wherejlhe^^aration of the minerals occurred.
Limerock was used during the flux process. Tap holes wereJ^aK^|8t|3ifferent levels in the furnace to
filter the minerals and rocks (including iron, copper, and slag rock). Trfe^pjhole-for the iron and slag
rock was located higher than the copper tap hole. Th^^nmM^slag rock "collected from this filtration
was considered waste. The copper mineral was^llecte^^^^ad^djnto^dx^cars for shipment to a
copper refinery. (URS 1993)
Because gold is heavy, it settledftoShe bottonfbf the furnUcTand formed a gold matte. After the
J^3pff $> $?
gold accumulated to a thickness of 14|ncnes, the^furnace was|snut down. Once the furnace and materials
cooled, the sides of the furnace, werevfemoved t^ain^acc^ssHo the gold matte, which was then pried
. . K „ .. .
cut intolpjecesdbefore bemg.loaded into box cars and shipped to a gold refinery.
"*%#«-'•*• '
In the operational period oX(tHe'copper and gold smelter, two large steam engines, fueled by coal,
provided powetrfBOT^trayneel stearrreiigines were hooked onto one long line shaft. On the other end of
X^'-'^*!^''^^, *?r
'"' "^fa •**•"") $X
the line shaft, a dynamo produced 10,000 volts of electricity prior to being boosted by a generator that
*!;'•* It2 ,i\'-"" -
•fs f'^'-\V
provided up to 100,000 volts.--Once the smelter reopened to process lead ores, a high-voltage line from
Canada supplied the power; and the steam plant was shut down. (URS 1993)
The lead smelter used a process more sophisticated than that used in the copper and gold process,
although a large ^quantity of sulfur (approximately 30 tons per day) was still being discharged into the air.
Filters for the smokestacks were added later. (URS 1993)
The abandoned and dismantled smelter remained inactive after closure in 1922. The town of
Northport demolished the buildings for the usable brick. One building retained enough walls to provide
an ice-skating rink during the winter. The railroad was abandoned and the tracks salvaged. (URS 1993)
10 START-2\01020028\S772 2-7
-------
The smelting operations produced a tailings waste referred to as slag. The slag was usually
placed in piles near the smelter for temporary or permanent disposal The contaminants of concern
(COCs) in the slag include arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, zinc, and other metals commonly
associated with the smelting process.
2.3.2.1.2 START-2 Site Visit & r ,-
On June 29, 2001, START-2 and EPA personnel visited the,sand bar^acrj^ea at the Northport
boat launch located approximately 200 feet north of the Le Roj/Northport Srnelfer|p|pp^rjy. START-2 v
and EPA personnel observed black glassy sand-like material eflpng the bank;of the '©Qlui^lji^River at the
sand bar/beach and boat launch areas. The START-2 charac'tefifced the. material as slag^STARTr2
^"•5lS--X*?IrMd«*iSTli IWft ^ **• tv*f*f> J^*lXf'
personnel collected sediment samples at locations along the Gbjumlua5|River at the sand bar/beach and
boat launch areas. Brick remnants were observed scattered al|ing?tih'^6an^of the Columbia River near
the boat launch area.
f^l">'fi1?F\>.
On September 13, 2001, START-2; EPA pere"onn||£p|>n Hurst ofEplcfum Environmental; and
Murray McConnachie, the property owner reprelenfative^fg^Mylj^ja walkthrough of the former
Le Roi/Northport Smelter site. An area of sla|; bricks was obseryfdJsoutrTof the former smelter
A" '.-' $Sf?*"5-V'
f"fl *j>* t'JV "
operations. The slag bricks were observMsto be glossy black. Atpotential former tailings pile was
Jpssjjf ffi ^f
observed west of the slag brick area.Jsfone foundations and pld brick walls from the former smelter
,Mf j-'^if _•;;.'"''
facility remain on the site. The'majority of thes^emai^are located on the northern portion of the
property. jGfijeQpj|three originai|snwkestacks isXs||||]spinaing. This remaining stack was reported as the
second largestjsta'ckjfrbeing oniy;,half^m^size of the large stack. It stands approximately 75 feet high and
has a maximum .wi01^lofiapproxirria^ly|iQ|eet.
The STa^T^-cqilejpted sedime|[t;and soil samples from locations on the property (Figure 2-3).
j$£es""~ ^s'i^f4^
The resultsxif the 9 sediment samples collected from the sand bar/beach and boat launch areas are
i * ' T ' ri V^-n
included in Table 6-1. A detailed discussion of sampling activities conducted, sample results,
recommendations, and conclusions, can be found in the Upper Columbia River Mines and Mills
Preliminary Assessments and Site Inspections Report (E&E 2002a).
2.3.2.2 Cominco Smelter
The Cominco smelter is located approximately 10 RM upstream of the U.S -Canada border
(Figure 2-2) Smelter operations have been underway in Trail, B.C., since 1896 (G3 Consulting 2001a).
The smelter became known as Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of Canada Ltd. in 1906, was
10START-2\01020028\S772 2-8
-------
officially renamed Cominco in 1966, and merged with Teck Ltd. to become Teck Cominco, Ltd. in 2001
(G3 Consulting 200Ib). Cominco smelts cadmium, copper, gold, lead, zinc, and other products from ores
mined in various regions of North and South America (G3 Consulting 2001a).
The Cominco lead/zinc smelter process produces slag as a by-product. This slag undergoes a
fuming process in fuming furnaces which allows recovery of substantial quantities of metals, in particular
lead and zinc. This fuming process involves injection of air and coal into molten slag, driving off metals
that are then recovered as an oxide fume (Nener 1992). At the endjof a fuming 'cycle* molten-treated slag
is granulated with water, and the slurry discharged to the Columbia River (NenertJ9^2jl/v>,This procedure^
of discharging began when operations first started and continued through jo-rhid-i9^S|^!Jejiiervl992).;i';:
Under the assumption that treated granulated slag was inertJthe'smelte^was perrmttedWdisehatge up to
*i'"/iS&|Sf'r ^%3f"$f$;*
1,000 tons per day. The amount of slag discharged was reduc^^fi^f;rnid-1980s to about'450 tons per
day (USGS 1994). The slag is a black, glassy material whic^f^^^a^ro;ximately 2.5% zinc, 0.1%
lead, and 1% copper. Other metals are present at low concevhtrationsA^}|e,^tuik;;of the material has the
size and texture of sand; however, approximately l%'b^^^ig]fo,consists o£fin|f*which have a broken
jSJJ."'
egg-shell or needle-like morphology. (Nener 1992Y
jy,-(S
Historically, effluent from Comincojias been dischargedJ^tiielGolumbia River through five
.•ft-' v.f xA^lf-^'''
outfalls. One outfall from the WarfieldjFeffrlizer Operation, thre^'submerged outfalls from the
CsS? 1%? f-'l ^f
metallurgical plants, and one from th^sjag' laundeftystem (Cominco 1997). The production of treated
slag from the fuming furnace operation was about 4,OOjpniTper day and was reportedly discharged to the
river in acco^djace with B^ffinmonment efflufntfjxjrmit PE-02753. (Cominco 1991)
In:1994t\concerns expressed by the public and government agencies over the principle of river
discharge prornple|;jGdf^inco to uMerrt^,'an extensive research program on the metals-related
environmentajaprppepfe^^slag and anvfovestigation into systems for slag collection and land disposal.
Testing of-'slag samples*w^a|^cqnducted using both the B C protocol Special Waste Extraction Procedure
and the^U.S. version Toxicity'Gharacteristic Leachate Procedure which are utilized to characterize waste
materials. Based on the test results, Cominco confirmed the long held position that granulated slag has a
high degree of chemical stability and is essentially inert in the river environment Cominco
recommended that the implementation of land disposal of slag was not an immediate priority and it could
be delayeii without significant environmental consequences until the completion of Phase n of Lead
Smelter Modernization (Cominco 1991)
A 1992 study by J C Nener presents data obtained by the Canadian Department of Fisheries and
Oceans as part of its fisheries assessment on the toxicity of fumed slag to aquatic organisms
10 START-2\01020028\S772 2-9
-------
(WSDH 1993) Fumed slag was collected from Commco's lead/zinc smelter located at Trail, B.C and
tested for toxicity using five species of aquatic organisms representative of different levels of the food
chain: Selenastrum capncornutum, a unicellular green algae; Daphma magna, a zooplanktonic species;
Hyalella azteca, an epibenthic invertebrate; Chironomus tentans, a benthic invertebrate; and
Oncorhynchus mykiss, rainbow trout fmgerlings. Slag was found to be deterimental to all species
studied Results indicate that the five species of organisms tested were all negatively impacted by
exposure to slag, or in some cases supernatants prepared from slag^under study.cpnditions. Results of
inductively coupled argon plasma scans on bioassay water collejitpd at the co"mpletipnrof.each bioassay ,,
indicated that elevated levels of copper and zinc may have been at least partly'responsible,fcJr, the acute
*fl*:' **.31?'* *(•£*JSV-iSi-S^Vil'K*. • <>£*' ••*
toxicity observed. Results of histological analyses performeH/on^ainbo^w trout expose'dftQ^sia^'^ndTcated
that slag also caused mortality by abrading delicate exposed sutf^ces?|]uch as gills. Extrapolation of these
results to the Columbia River would be speculative; however^bloa^y^resuUs clearly showed that slag is
not biologically inert and therefore suggests that there may be some poKnfil^t^itiegatively impact
organisms in the receiving environment. (Nener 1992|i^E^^^ ^l^l'?^'
The discharge of slag to the Columbia Riye^was|liscoiiqm«d in rnjd-i995. Prior to this, up to
,,_,._,, - , , . , ,. , , <•<'••* 11 &v 2f$w%is8ii$f$$$y . . . „
145,000 tons of slag had been discharged annually, moving do\rastream,to settle out in slower flowing,
*$^ ^^ ^^tjf ^j^ ^
sandy areas. The environmental effect&ofjslag discharge to the fiver includes both chemical and physical
components. Chemical effects includjMincfeased|Jjciads of heavy metals and potential bioaccumulation
and toxicity problems in river OTganisrns. Physicalreffecte|jriclude scouring of plant and animal life from
, j48L f . ,., , . . f. , - ,
nver substjate,s,'^lamage tojlil^^id^oft tissuesx>mquatic insects and fish, and smothering of habitat and
food soufc'e1^(G3;'Sonsukingi2'
•c, *.«*&&•<•*,... ° \^^iv _
onD^tntai^Repprt, which was developed to present outcomes of process
Jjjraph ofejnetals in effluents from the metallurgical operation from 1980
to 1996 ^According to thejl'^lrcp^rt, the average discharges for total dissolved metals were as high as
18 kilograms per day (kg/d^farsenic, 62 kg/d of cadmium, 200 kg/d of lead, 4 kg/d of mercury, and
7,400 kg/d of zinc Additionally, fertilizer plant operations contributed up to 4 kg/d of mercury and
350 kg/d of zinc (Cominco 1997)
,- « -. Between 1995 and 1999, the percent reduction for several key metals from all sources (air, slag,
and water) discharged directly to the Columbia River was reported to be 90% for arsenic, 84% for
cadmium, 99% for copper, 77% for lead, 95% for mercury, and 92% for zinc A new lead smelter was
commissioned in 1997 and became fully operational in 1999, reportedly providing improved air emission
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-10
-------
and effluent treatment controls Currently, the Cominco slag is being stockpiled. Cominco has an active
market development program seeking ways to use the slag beneficially. (G3 Consulting 200la)
The Trail, B.C., area has been designated a Contaminated Site by Environment Canada.
Cominco has hired a consultant to conduct an ecological risk assessment related to Trail operations. The
results will be integrated with the findings of a human health risk assessment conducted by the Trail Lead
Task Force. This task force was composed of representatives from numerous Trail community groups,
local government, the Province of B.C., and Cominco. The Trail Gominco SiMy/i^ea is shown in
Figure 2-4. (Cantox 2000) 4&$ '' ?rl||%^||V.
In 2001, Cominco initiated a groundwater investigation'of the Trai^Smelte^ajcili^as part of
their ongoing work to inventory and characterize potential s6ufc.es of^bh'tamination to'tljej^nyirpjiment.
The purpose of the investigation was to obtain an estimate of-irie^uantities of dissolved metals and other
^^^&^£f>&^
substances discharging into the Columbia River, via groundwS.ter^f9)|tojjHe,r the smelter. The
investigation consisted of the installation and testing of 18 groundwate^moniforirig wells at eight
locations, including five along the back of the Columl)ia}Riyer)^rhe invesfi^a^ri found evidence of
groundwater contamination (Cominco 1998). s^^' ,$*
Additional work planned in the groundwater invpstigat^n|^itt]tfesmelter site includes five more
monitoring well sites in 2002 to allow a-more complete assessment of the contaminant loadings to the
ftp -y
Columbia River. Additionally, regionalsgroundwater investigations will be performed to identify surface
water drainages in the Cominco Study Area that^rnaVbe effected by contaminated groundwater discharge
;$> ^,,$/ m-w/^mt-s
(Cominco 19,98);,
"K/ Mttw-wi^-1!
2 3.2.2.1 Trail
The Con^M|mlit%discha?geSdSulphides into the air through a brick stack 409 feet high. The
*y
air pollution traveled south and.remained trapped in northern Stevens County Columbia River Valley In
"" *•*- '^ ^-^ '
1925, the Trail Smelter increased the discharge of sulfur dioxide into the air from 4,700 to 10,000 tons a
,-r t .--' ^
month The citizens of Northport complained that sulfur pollution was threatening their health and
environment. They insisted that area soils and forests were becoming poisoned with sulfur, causing their
- <-<"!• r\
crops arid forest land to die. They formed a "Citizens Protective Association" of farmers and property
owners whose letters of protest were sent to politicians in both Ottawa and Washington. The matter,
known as the Trail Smelter Case of 1926 to 1934, was the first case of air pollution brought before an
international tribunal. (Northport Pioneers 1981)
10START-2\01020028\S772 2-11
-------
In 1926, a Northport farmer wrote to Cormnco complaining about fumes. Corrunco offered to
buy the property of those that had suffered damage, Washington state alien land laws prohibited foreign
corporations from owning American real estate, and the farmer was informed by local officials that he
could not sell his land to Cominco. (Northport Pioneers 1981)
The matter moved to the level of international diplomacy. The U S. State Department opened
negotiations to collect damages from the Canadian government for the citizens of Northport. The State
Department did press the case of the Americans, and the Canadian.Consul-General -wrote his prime
•1C „ , x Vj'j '.
minister that their nation was facing what amounted to an international lawsuit^TJiejGangdian ~,.
government suggested that the fumes problem should be plaqejj on the agenda of tne^tem^tiijnal Joint
Commission (LTC). The IJC did not consider the case until August 1928?' In 1931, the ujSreconimended
that the Canadian government stop polluting the atmosphere ajad|pa'y||iarnages assessed against the
corporation in the amount of $350,000. The U.S. govemmen^lspealangifgr.fall of the claimants, refused
to accept the $350,000 award, and asked that the case be reexamined by|^n*f|ij>ifration tribunal. In 1935,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt formally announced^hlfe^^^eaty of Arb|&$ti.pri was in effect. In
1938, the appointed members of the tribunal anjcjuriced a^^Jj^^jy Finaji^Decision assessing an
additional $78,000 in damages for injuries sustained froni 193i?kpm^£^They also announced temporary
control measures for the smelter. The tribjQnal issued/a new Final'Decision which was published in 1941.
•Xft&t^iiaW Sfc? feP*
They decided that no damage had tal&njffilace afterjd'938 in Stevens County. They also issued a policy
statement that itself became a precedent in futuj<|lcj^esj)jRthis kind: "No State has the right to use or
permit the uselpf»its temtorv?ini$uchla mannertasloVause injury by fumes or to the territory of another or
V*****" J ' } }
the propertiest;pr.persons therein* ^h'erf the case is of serious consequence and the injury is established by
the clear and c^nVincin^'ieyidenceSrne.Dorninion of Canada is responsible in international law for the
"*'$*?*i''33*^^vv ^•"^rY'Vr-W" -•>*'
conduct of th^^llpf^Nortrlp^ppioneers 1981)
""
2.3.3, "Pulp Industry ^f%-"
Celgar Pulp Company (Celgar) operates a bleach kraft pulp mill in Castlegar, B.C.,
approximately 30 RMs upstream from the U S.-Canada border (Figure 2-4). The mill operated from
1961'until mid-1993, and primarily used chlorine in its bleaching process The pulp mill discharged
effluent containing chlorinated organic compounds including dioxins and furans into the Columbia River
(USGS 1994)
As a result of concerns about health implications of dioxin and furan levels in fish downstream
of pulp mills, the provincial and federal governments initiated fish sampling in the Columbia River from
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-12
-------
1988 to 1990 as part of a nation-wide survey' Levels in a variety of species downstream of Celgar,
including rainbow trout, showed low or normal background levels of contamination, with the exception
of whitefish, which showed levels above background. In response to these findings, a consumption
advisory was issued by the local Medical Health Officer recommending that consumers of whitefish
caught in the vicinity of the area from the Hugh Keenlyside Dam to the U.S -Canada border limit their
consumption to one meal per week. The 1990 whitefish consumption advisory prompted voluntary
changes to the mill's bleach plant to reduce chlorinated furan (i.e./2,3,7,8 TCDFJ,effluent discharges
•into the Columbia River. (Celgar 1994) jjjH^ £$$$$&<
In 1993, Celgar completed a major expansion and modernization project irieluding;the /,<•
installation of a new bleach plant that uses chlorine dioxide instead of chlorine for bleaching pulp and a
F fettMKSft*''' *3Sg,Vr
«H&W&
w^H;svrfe*'' • "furans and by 1993 had
reduced dioxin and furan concentrations in effluent to belo\/nTinimuhTpetecti0n;.limits. In 1995, the
*'•yw'jt 'f't .,, -*••«• ~
Medical Health Officer removed the whitefish consumptij6^a4^Jsory (USGSU-9,94, Celgar 1994).
As a result of pulp process effluent discharges, apj^Snmtfformed^ownstream of Celgar's
fll TTK f f „ ft, ^ ' fh • H- H „•
outfalls. Fibre mats often form when effluent^containm&wooaMebnsmnd pulp fibres is discharged into
A 4
an aquatic environment and then settles toUhe substrate and accumulates. While fibre mats are readily
degraded by microorganisms (produclng'ammonia^and hydrogen sulfide by-products), they often contain
persistent chemicals from pulp,production and gleacju'ngjSfo'cesses. Persistent chemicals documented in
other fibre.mats'have included*pplypuclear aromatic 'hydrocarbons, tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, and
,«r:Sy*frx ^^'
iYideo survey of the fibre mat located downstream of Celgar's
'jv * v--'% •""
discharge was col&^uc^^r^omparisonwvith similar surveys in 1990 and 1992. EVS Consultants
X'fei&^"a&®$BSli&&£*r X>
^vV- SW^?^^J4^T*l(
prepared a report on the^fibrejnattwhich was submitted to the B C. Ministry of Environment, Land, and
"-yV'"'.v •:' C~'
Parks in'1995. The study states that the fibre mat adjacent to the mill had decreased in size and character
ta>,' M? * t1"'
as a result of process changes, and that the remaining mat now consisted of black silt (flyash) and wood
debris mix Recommended areas of study identified by EVS Consultants to Celgar include: characterize
the fibre mat for organic contaminants, especially dioxins and furans, assess the toxicity of the fibre mat
to benthic invertebrates; monitor contaminant concentrations of dioxin and furan in mountain whitefish
and suckers for comparison with historical data; conduct an intensive survey of benthic
macroinvertebrates; and, describe and determine the physical extent of the fibre mat. (Celgar 1994)
10START-2\01020028\S772 2-13
-------
2.3.4 Other Potential Sources of Contamination
Cominco's 1997 Environmental Report identified Stoney Creek, located just upstream of the
Cominco smelter near RM 755, as a significant contributor of contaminants to the Columbia River
(Cormnco 1998). The Stoney Creek watershed is affected by Teck-Cominco's historic waste dumping
and current storage activities, which contribute metal-laden drainage from seepage and surface runoff, as
well as runoff from the urban area and a municipal landfill (G3 Consulting ZOOlb). Cominco's 1997
$$&• 4^
Environmental Report identified seepage from an old landfill site .and an old arseni^storage site as the
source of contaminants from Stoney Creek (Cominco 1998). Tetlc'Cominco cbmpleteciiinstallation of a-
^'u>5* rv>"«3Sf''Ti?jLr 'W~l> c
seepage collection system in late 1999 to collect and divert water from Stoney Cree^|©3^onsulting5?'
2001b). Water and sediment in Stoney Creek contained elevated .arsenic, cadmium, cop~°- '"'--"i «"^ -;'
.„,-,- _..,.,„. .and zinc
levels compared to other tributaries. Stoney Creek metal levij^^biQ^vater (loads, calculated as
concentration multiplied by flow) and sediment were reportedjy^fMu^plibstantially between 1995 and
1999, with exception of copper levels, which increased in se'diment. ({jjsflonsu'lting 2001b)
de munici^ll^stewater treatment
Permitted waste discharges in the Columbia^
facilities in Castlegar and Trail, B.C. Permitt
indirectly via the Colville River. These are
A
River from the cities of Colville, Washingfph, and
enterjthe upper Columbia River
ffr
tes discharged into the Colville
Washington (USGS 1994).
2.4 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ^fe--^-'1''
Pas.djnvestigationsfpf^the^fcDer Colurnbia^Riyer have been conducted at varying levels of scope
A summafy,pf previous investigation^ provided in the Upper Columbia River/Lake Roosevelt
Preliminary Ass^js^nijReport (E'^p^OO)., Past sediment studies have demonstrated the presence of
hazardous subsjafic^||nc^ding arsenic;|fcadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc in sediments collected
from the upper Cc
,-jf" •s^w^s.vjs.1%;,"
rV/A 1992 study by thetU.S/Geological Survey (USGS) assessed the sediment quality of Lake
Roojevelt and the reach of the Columbia River downstream from the U.S.-Canada border. Elevated
copper and zinc concentrations were associated with sandy sediment found in the Northport reach of the
Cqlujpbia River.i(t,In the study, the elevated concentrations in bed sediments were explained by the
t>»4xi^f""'\'-'' *•'•*}'* >>&• / <
presence of slag particles that contained concentrations of these trace elements as high as
6,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for copper and 25,000 mg/kg for zinc The slag particles,
consisting of dark glassy needles and angular grains, were progressively finer at sites with downstream
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-14
-------
distance. A detailed discussion of the study by USGS can be found in the USGS Open File
Report 94-315. (USGS 1994)
In 1994, the USGS, in cooperation with the Colville Confederated Tribes, analyzed fish tissue to
determine levels of mercury and other metals in three fish species (walleye, smallmouth bass, and
rainbow trout) in three reaches within the Columbia River- the reach between Northport and Kettle Falls,
the Spokane River Arm reach, and the San Foil reach The highest concentrations of mercury were found
in walleye samples, with concentrations ranging from 0.11 mg/kg(to 0.44 mg/kglf, Sniallmouth bass and
rainbow trout samples also contained mercury, but at lower cortc|n^rations. Altii^ilgnrUie Federal Food
and Drug Administration standard of 1.0 parts per million wasjpot exceeded,'the USG§;,an^iW,ashington
Department of Health (WSDH) issued a fact sheet that advis'e&Jthe public to limit consumptiori-of
walleye taken from Lake Roosevelt (USGS 1997). In 1998, tf^^Jnttiated a follow-up fis'rftissue study
to determine present concentrations of mercury, dioxins and furtnsf^!f,B<2Bs, and if possible, determine
,-.
if concentrations have changed since the 1994 studies. The'study conclu13edjthat-.the concentrations of
° J > ';V"to '• /** "*» .tVv-
*^'7*;- wJH$3>t' '*fe'
contaminants in fish that were identified as a potentialfutfe^Bf^human health^nave either not changed
SV
since the 1994 studies, or have decreased. Thejsmdy foundftnat'/ephcentratibns of PCBs in rainbow trout
T jt^WS'-'t^: T'"%' -f^'f
remained elevated and did not appear to be decreasing. mlthou^glMi'OMJqis'lind furans were still present in
.5? ,f> li'f^l'^J""
sport fish, concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCIJE^iad decreased in rainbow trout, although not in whitefish.
/•t^' -,/,'' J.V*"
The study found that concentrations
-------
The objectives of the survey were to obtain current data on sediment metals concentrations and toxicity
on the nine 303(d) listed sites within Lake Roosevelt and the upstream reach of the Columbia River, and
to determine if the sites should remain on the 303(d) list. (Ecology 2001)
Sediment samples were analyzed for arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc.
Bioassays for sediment toxicity included Chironomus tentans 20-day survival and growth, Hyalella
azteca 10-day survival, and Microtox® 100% porewater. Sediment samples taken at the upper Columbia
River sampling sites (sites 1 to 3) consisted of a visibly dark sandy mixture,Jyhich*possibly indicated the
presence of slag from the Cominco Smelter Elevated levels of copper and zinc^wefejfound at these same
three sites, indicating that slag material may still be present injthe upper Columbia ""'•--
(Ecology 2001)
The study found that metals concentrations and toxicif
*'''&'4*' "
i Lake Roosevelt and upper
Columbia River sediments remain relatively high. All but >
(near Grand Coulee Dam)
had at least one elevated toxicity level from the suite of bioassay tests'pertoi
tfijr&ti$'
elevate'd||Jn tiiie upper Columbia River
*$''
(EraJmdSerdar2001)
ton the sediments. In
ovn*,, ' "^PWIS??
.^W-nS ife, 7i*Sl.,'-5¥>.
Lake Roosevelt, cadmium, mercury, and zinc concentrjifo
reach, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc concentrations
Although the bioassay listing decisions for thejsfudy aoSoM^|°nd on the results of metal
concentrations for Lake Roosevelt sedintenfs, Ecology "noted thejelationship between sediment toxicity
and metals concentrations. Ecology^cjunpared me^ls concent|ations to Freshwater Sediment Quality
Values for metals in Washington state and to Consensus-Based Threshold Effects Concentrations for
,*, *m?%> $%v Ss^!«s&a*rtJ*i#"
t U > -'€R- U $$&&$ O 1
freshwater.sedunents shown-mlFable 2-1.
^SS.'.'^riiS^SBii'v
BaXe^;voiiiJi^ existing*3p^(4){pol|cy, which requires only one toxicity hit per segment or grid,
eight of nine site^^^^d) listing^|enar^However, none of the sampling segments met criteria based
l^l^^'jiplicy, whjgh requires toxicity at three separate locations within a segment
on the newly
or grid Consequently, iF^as^re^olnmended that the eight sites showing toxicity be reassigned to part 5,
/ y ijjyV::^** ••?&./
Undetermined Status, of the'proposed 2002 303(d) list The study also concluded that regardless of the
303(d) listing status, therejis sufficient toxicity at the majority of sampling sites in the upper Columbia
River, and Lake Roosevelt to warrant further investigation. (Ecology 2001)
10 START-2\01020028\S772
2-16
-------
Table 2-1
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
2001 SAMPLING EVENT
COMPARISON OF METALS IN LAKE ROOSEVELT SEDIMENTS TO FSQVs AND CONSENSUS-BASED TECs
FOR FRESHWATER SEDIMENTS
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Site Name
Lower Arrow Lake
Boundary
Auxiliary Gage
Goodeve Creek
Kettle River
Castle Rock
Whitestone Creek
Whitestone Creek (duplicate)
Sanpoil
Swawilla Basin
Grand Coulee Dam
FSQVs
Consensus-Based TECs
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
20 U
66
50
200
20 U
83
130
130
35
110
92
57
98
Cadmium
046
£2
18.0
1M
LQ
LI
11.9
12.4
L?
12.4
18
51
099
Copper
4
494
2210
2210
16
66
74
76
20
73
11
390
32
Lead
12
182
324
344
5
173
285
292
19
295
17
450
36
Mercury
00004 U
010
002
008
00007 U
0.68
1.25
1.07
003
1.25
003
041
018
Zinc
27
3730
16100
12200
34
471
952
979
70
1040
86
410
121
CO
I
Source Ecology 2001
Note Bold type indicates sample concentration is above the FSQV
Underlined type indicates the sample concentration is above the TEC
Key
FSQV = Freshwater Sediment Quality Values FSQVs represent the moderately conservative values that have been used to evaluate potential effects of metals concentrations to benthic life (Ecology 2001)
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
TEC
= Threshold Effects Concentrations TECs are concentrations below which harmful effects on sediment dwelling organisms are not expected to occurr, and are therefore more conservative values
(Ecology 2001)
U = The analyte was not delected The associated numerical value is the contract required detection limit
-------
120'
118
52
EXPLANATION
Drainage-basin boundary
100 MILES
100 KILOMETERS
BRITISH COLUMBIA
CANADA
UNITED STATES
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in the Environment
Soaltki, Watrunglon
-UPPERCOLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Stevens County, Washington
Source USCS 1958
Figure 2-1
LAKE ROOSEVELT
DRAINAGE BASIN
Date
10-14-02
Drawn by
AES
10 START-2\01020028\fig 2-1
2-18
-------
"TUNITED STATES
PJ
Approximate Location of
Celgar Pulp Mill
Figure
location
BRILLIANT
DAM
stlegar
Approximate Location of
TeckCominco Smelter
40 KILOMETERS
30'
Approximate
BOUNDARY
DAM -4
Northport\\ 7
LeRoi Smelter
Northern Extent
of EPA 2001
Sediment Sampling
Southern Extent of EPA 2001
Sediment Sampling
Spokane
Reservation
AT
Figure 2-2
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
VICINITY MAP
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Stevens County, Washington
ecology and environment, inc.
ntsmational Specialists in the Environment
SootU. Wuhnglon
10 START-2\01020028\fig 2-2
2-19
-------
Slag Boundary
(extent unknown)
o
Approximate Location
of Newly
Constructed Ditch
g iso 300
Approximate Scale in Feet
LEGEND'
® Northport City Well
• Northport Smelter Sample Location
,____ Site Boundary
1—I—I—t- Burlington Northern RR
£1,1111} Former (No Longer Standing)
0 Smoke Stack
Unpaved Road
Slag
§ ecology and environment, inc.
Internationa) Specialists m [ha Environment
Saattto Wa»Woflfon
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Stevens County, Washington
Source, E&E GIS, 2002
Figure 2-3
LE ROI/NORTHPORT SMELTER
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
Date
10-14-02
Drawn by
AES
10 START-2\01020028\fig 2-3
2-20
-------
Kootenay
River
XI
rilliant Dam
~\>\
Study
Area
Pend d'Oreille
River
IJyp] ecology and environment, inc.
n[5n International Speaalisls in Die Environment
Nf ScatUt WathJnglon
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Source BCWLAP2002
Figure 2-4
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
TECK COMINCO STUDY AREA
Date
10-14-02
Drawn by
AES
10 START-2\01020028\fig 2-4
2-21
-------
8
Upper Columbia
River Basin
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Lake
,
yUl ecology and environment, inc.
^It&D International Speoabsts in the Environment
1 ^p Sean* Washington
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Stevens County, Washington
Source WADOE200!
Figure 2-5
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
ECOLOGY'S SEDIMENT SAMPLING
LOCATION MAP
Dale
10-14-02
Drawn by
AES
10 START-2\OI020028\fig 2-5
2-22
-------
3. FIELD ACTIVITIES AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL
A SQAP for the upper Columbia River ESI activities was developed by^WEST0N prior to
performing the field sampling (WESTON 200la). The SQAP wasgbased on.b^ck^^nd information
collected by E & E. The SQAP describes the sampling strategjjprnpling analytical .;•_•
program used to identify hazardous substances potentially pretent in sedimfnVs wi^^^^^wper ^^
Columbia River and the potential impact to targets A detai||d&Uscussibn of field activfngjiiffid^''
analytical protocol for the nine sediment samples collected fro;
areas at Le Roi/Northport Smelter can be found in the
Preliminary Assessments and Site Inspections Report (E & E 2002a).
The field sampling event was conducted
individuals. Mark Munn and Gil Bortleson (reU
to the field crew. Craig Sprankle of the
drawdown operations. Adeline Fredineie ColvillConfede
d bar/beach and boat launch
er Mines and Mills
of various/iorganizations and
lanning and logistical advice
on lake levels and
Tribes History/Archaeology
Department facilitated coordination jpjSBPA's planned sampling activities with the Colville Tribes
mr *d$?
Archaeology Department. Steve TrjHnly, archaeplprisyviurthe Colville Tribes History/Archaeology
Departmen^^wided arch^^^^^^istance ir^{fn|ne)df Ray DePuydt and Scott Hebner, NPS
archaeolo^^^^^^rovided^r^^^pigY assistance in the field, and reviewed all proposed river
sediment samplffig^lc^atlgns. Appff)xmiat^y|>15 sampling locations were offset in order to avoid known
cultural resouro^^^Mig^^^er, Gif?I$sBret, and Dan Mason of the National Parks Service made park
resources^vailable to the*field*sampjing crew, including provisions for back-up vessels and emergency
assistance, and secure overnighfequipment storage. Al Johnson of the U S. Forest Service assisted with
sample collection. Dennis Francis of the City of Grand Coulee assisted in locating and providing access
•v ,
to drinking water supplylsampling points at the City of Grand Coulee. Sampling was conducted using
EP^A'rpsearch vessels (R V. Monitor, and a 17-foot Boston Whaler) operated by Doc Thompson and
Dave-;Terf»enirig-6f the EPA
" The field event was conducted by WESTON from May 14 to June 28, 2001 In total, 187
samples were collected (Figure 3-1) from the upper Columbia River and potential receptors/targets.
Potential receptors/targets may include wetland areas, fisheries, surface water intakes, sensitive
10 START-2\01020028\S772
3-1
-------
environments, etc. as defined in the EPA MRS; Final Rule (EPA 1990) Samples were analyzed for
Target Analyte List (TAL) metals, chlorinated pesticide (pesticide)/PCBs, volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and total organic carbon (TOC) The samples
collected consist of
Upper Columbia River and its Tributaries /.„
• 49 surface sediment samples between RM 675 and the U.S -Cana'da border.
• 110 surface sediment samples from tributariesjo^tHe'upper Columbia>Riyer between RM
&Te' .f'K'i-'5'>,-53"'-5"rf5-
675 and the U.S.-Canada border. j§J j&
- . .
at launch'areas at the'Le;Roi/Northpbrt
j/gp •"aKa^fy?„'-•:.v» 'r
ampling event.
9 sediment samples from sand bar/beach an
Smelter collected by E & E during the June
Grand Coulee Dam
• 3 sediment samples near the Grand CouJjsejR1.
• 1 surface water sample from the
distribution point (CW001) an
system intake (CW002).
Pend Oreille County and Stevens County (in conjunction with mine and mill site visits)
10 sediment/soil samples fromllSca'tionsiJipstream/upland of mine and mill sites visited
>ulee municipal drinking water system
front Lake Roosevelt near the
- • r> J /-i -10 J ct'^C
gyn Pend OreilfeCounty and StewW§ounTy.
wai
from tributaries to the lower Pend Oreille River and upper
Columbia Riverftj
^.Jpfe,. f"*®$&W*y~ •„ • • ,
67soilteamples from mine and mill sites visited.
,.,-*-' ^f£®f$ft%V
Discussions of anal^caljresults in this report will be limited to only the sediment samples
collected from the upper Columbia River. Tributary sediment sample results are presented in a trip
report prepared for the EPA by WESTON in December 2001 (WESTON 2001b). A copy of analytical
results tables from this report are included in Appendix C Figures depicting data results of arsenic,
cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc in tributary sediment samples are provided in Appendix D
"" "* "Samples near the Grand Coulee Dam were collected to determine the concentration of potential
hazardous substances near or at the municipal intake Since these samples were collected outside the ESI
study area (i e., RM 675 to the U S.-Canada border), they will not be included in the surface water targets
discussed in Section 7 of this report However, analytical data summary tables for these samples are
10START-2\01020028\S772 3-2
-------
provided in Appendix C. The two surface water samples collected from the City of Grand Coulee
municipal drinking water system distribution point (CW001) and from Lake Roosevelt near the system
intake (CW002) did not contain pesticide/PCBs or SVOCs at concentrations above detection limits The
analysis for VOCs revealed the presence of chloroform at 26 micrograms per liter in water sample
CW001. The concentration of chloroform and detected metal concentrations were not above existing
federal drinking water standards. ;\
A discussion of analytical results for samples collected in conjunction .yvitti'.the Stevens County
and Pend Oreille County mine and mill site visits can be found^injfhe Upper OoIurnpiiaMyer Mines and ~
,v*y!}~* f'-, * **" .••" X;u-**« ./» , ,
Mills Preliminary Assessments and Site Inspections Report, dated October-2002 ahd;,flie''Lower Pend -•
Oreille River Mines and Mills Preliminary Assessments andlSite^Inspections Report, dafetilApnl.^OC^.
fe^S^i-fe*^ ^"*•' **
feSs
3.1 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
W ^»l$feiv
ESI sample identification, types, and methods of collection are%lescribeaJ3elow. A list of all
_*« rr » t*^r* it~"* P-ATX* <**
samples collected for laboratory analysis are containeffi^^^i^3-l at the^lp'xiphis section. A
'.
%%;ontaine8 in Section 6. Photographic
discussion of the upper Columbia River sedimenpampl&
documentation of ESI field activities are coplffihed in Appenlipg^||^
3.1.1 Sample Identification
At the request of the EP^A.^tation idenU^jcatioiQjniO codes were revised to follow a sequential
— j"^ . „ ..A.l'i-1^2_i— .I., ui^^ggk 2_j presents the original station codes (listed
-
order fromjd^pwnstream to^u
_J{on§the
as the Intemail^ample ED) anS^ts^orjesppnding new station code (listed as the Station ID). The sample
IDs consist of a't^Q-^Jtter.code indwa1;ujgj1tihe;,station type, followed by a three-digit sequential number.
The following,st|0otf^^1(5^|:s were*u||d:
««'!*>''• ~s*«5v.>* '"' ' *'~™
.•r'cs
cw
Vc'j TS
* * J*»**> .
'-V^'US
" •' uw
RS
RW
TB
Cqlumbia'River sediment
Columbia River surface water
•Tributary sediment
Tributary sediment/soil (upstream/upland sampling location)
Upland surface water
Rinsate of sediment sampling equipment
Rinsate of water sampling equipment
Trip Blank
10 START-2\01020028\S772
3-3
-------
3.1.2 EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sediment Sampling
Sediment samples were collected from the upper Columbia River during a period of low water
The mean high water (MHW) or average annual full pool elevation for Lake Roosevelt is 1,290 feet
AMSL. All sediment samples from the river were collected from locations below the apparent MHW
elevation, as determined by estimated water level elevations and observed shoreline MHW level
indicators (e.g., water marks on shoreline, tree lines). Water levels measured at-Grand,jQoulee Dam
during the river sediment sampling period ranged from 1,237.01 fee.t AMSL:.on,fjvIayil4, 2001, to
1,277.88 feet AMSL on June 8, 2001. Many of the sampling locations were subalsnally,'exposed during -
,>® " , .jT'^'^f^'^l^vx
the sampling event because of the low water levels. Both exposed and submerged siwjmenfX^ropl?5
were collected. The sediment samples were collected from the^-most do.wnstream locationsttbltfeiriost
upstream locations. '"4'iV* s?*'-
All sediment samples were collected using stainless steel'§£u^plin^eguipment, including a petit
ponar dredge, hand auger, and/or bowls and spoons. All sampling waslcondu^^d^in accordance with the
'^^•^^"-i'iA'r''
TijiJ.'*WW!*' fit*
procedures outlined in the SQAP (WESTON
.11 i 11- -W KVmt , **, , , f i — m >
Submerged stations were sampled using^a-petit ponartdj;edge!. sampler deployed from the EPA
.$» " 'f^^j^^'^f^
research vessel Monitor. Sampling with the^dtit ponar^dredge!^quire3jbetween one and five grabs to
/?" t?f ^ffi*
collect the required sample volume. Penetration depths using the dredge ranged from 0 to 5 inches below
' '""
, .
the sediment surface. The sediment Jampies at Haag Cove (CS017) and Pingston Creek (CS024) were
collected from depth intervals ranging from 18ito-24.LnQhesfbelow the sediment surface. All other
48K
sediment samples^were colle^Jtei frgm 0 to 8 inches|tielow the sediment surface.
Tribu^rylsampling locationstwere identified based on USGS 7.5-minute series topographic
_ . - - u , , , , , u u
bowl and spoon. Water depths at tributary
'- depths up to 12 inches were recorded. Depths of
tributary sediment samp'lesVanged from 0.5 to 10 inches below the sediment surface.
Observations of sample material characteristics such as grain size, color, odor, and the presence
of debris (including suspected slag material) were noted on a Field Sampling Record Form for each
sample (Appendix F). Sample grain size was described according to visually estimated percentages of
gravel, sand, silt, and clay.
After the sample containers were filled, the samples were photographed and packed in coolers
with ice for shipment to analytical laboratories
10START-2\01020028\S772 3-4
-------
3.2 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS
In general, all samples were analyzed in accordance with the methods and procedures specified
in the SQAP (WESTON 2001a). A summary of chemical analyses performed on each sample and a
summary of sample QA/QC analysis is presented in Appendix G
3.3 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM
•'-,
The locations illustrated in the figures are based on differentially correctedt31obal Positioning
System (GPS) data recorded in the field and on location notes recorded on Field Sample Record Forms.
A table of corrected GPS coordinates and location notes for each sampling station is/provided in
*• • *
Appendix H. Copies of the Field Sample Record Forms for e^aeh^amplefare provided ir(-Appendix F.
^^fefSsJ^-
3.4 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION AND INygjSTIGATI^N-DERIVED WASTE
Procedures specified in the SQAP (WESTON 200la) for decontaminating equipment and
^^3^^. '$'t$Ei''J/i>!~;:"y
disposing of investigation-derived waste (IDW) were'.f6UOT?i^during fiefd-activities. Every effort was
•^^'ww£u ^r
made to minimize the need for decontamination of-sampling;equipment thrdtigh the use of dedicated
ffi •^lifte'^f"
pre-cleaned sampling equipment (e.g., bowlsJ'Spoons); hpweverntjtiejisejof non-dedicated sampling
^ ? i ^ i i "^-^\. ''^"if *•
."'> 'V; &>&'.*'
equipment (e.g., dredge samplers) was required in some locations/ as discussed previously. When used,
the non-dedicated sampling equipment;.iWas decontaminated prior to each use to avoid sample
cross-contamination.
, . #>
WESTlwN made everyfeffort to minimize 'the,generation of IDW that could not be disposed of as
/Iftfl'wl < "^fw^^-, ^-i"*
solid wasted *., -'"''•^W'iW.J.*- r r &
•iV?' * . ti-t 1t* $* ^.--jJ v-'-i-
Disposable personal. protective equipmentgenerated during field activities was double-bagged in plastic
',,'-! , .J'-,» (s ~> : /'r, ,.-
solid^aste disposal facility. No IDW water was generated during the
10 START-2VO1020028\S772 3 -5
-------
Table 3-1
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLE
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Station ID
CS004
CS005
CS006
CS007
CS008
CS009
CS010
CS011
CS012
CS013
CS014
CS015
CS016
CSOI7
CS017
CS018
CSOI9
CS020
CS021
Station Description
i^ake Roosevelt near
nchelium
.ake Roosevelt at point south
f Hall Creek
jke Roosevelt at Mission
'omt
.ake Roosevelt north of
)aisy Station
.ake Roosevelt south of
Cheweka Creek
Lake Roosevelt south of
Chalk Grade Point
Lake Roosevelt south of
-------
Table 3-1
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLE
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Station ID
CS022
CS023
CS024
CS025
CS026
CS027
CS028
CS029
CS030
CS031
CS032
CS033
CS034
CS035
CS036
CS037
CS038
CS039
Station Description
.ake Roosevelt, Marcus
^ats, southwest of Pmgston
Creek
_ake Roosevelt, Marcus Flats
west bank)
vlarcus Rats, north of
5mgston Creek
-jjke Roosevelt on Marcus
rials west of Pmgston Creek
Lake Roosevelt, Marcus
Flats, south of Marcus Island
Lake Roosevelt, Marcus
Rats, east of Kamloops
Lake Roosevelt, Marcus Flats
northeast
Lake Roosevelt north of
Summer Island
Lake Roosevelt on flats at
Evans Campground
Lake Roosevelt east of Snag
Cove
Lake Roosevelt on flats south
of Bossburg
Lake Roosevelt on flats north
of Bossburg
Lake Roosevelt on flats south
of North Gorge (east bank)
Lake Roosevelt on flats south
of North Gorge (west bank)
Lake Roosevelt east of Flat
Creek (north bank)
Lake Roosevelt at China Bar
Lake Roosevelt near
navigation light south of
Crown Creek
Lake Roosevelt north of
Rattlesnake Creek (east
bank)
Sample Interval
(inches below
media surface)
0-4"
0 < 0 25"
18-24"
0-3"
0-3"
0-4"
0-2"
0-2"
0- 1"
0-2"
0- 1"
0-5"
0- 1"
0-025"
0-2"
0-2"
0-3"
0-4"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking #
01214104
01214106
01234124
01214108
01214114
01214110
01214112
01214116
01214118
01214120
01214122
01214124
01214128
01214126
01214130
01214132
01214134
01214136
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0909
MJ0910
MJOBK4
MJ0911
MJ0914
MJ0912
MJ0913
MJ0915
MJ0916
MJ0917
MJ0918
MJ0919
MJ0921
MJ0920
MJ0922
MJ0923
MJ0924
MJ0925
Organic
CLP#
JX452
JX453
JX804
JX454
JX457
JX455
JX456
JX458
JX459
JX460
JX461
JX462
JX464
JX463
JX465
JX466
JX467
JX468
Internal
Sample ID
CR-024-SD
CR-025-SD
CR-062-SD
CR-026-SD
CR-029-SD
CR-027-SD
CR-028-SD
CR-030-SD
CR-031-SD
CR-032-SD
CR-033-SD
CR-034-SD
CR-036-SD
CR-035-SD
CR-037-SD
CR-038-SD
CR-039-SD
CR-040-SD
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
pesticide/P
CBs
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sample Date
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
8-Jun-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-Ol
21-May-OI
22-May-Ol
22-May-Ol
22-May-Ol
22-May-Ol
22-May-Ol
22-May-Ol
23-May-Ol
23-May-Ol
Sample
Time
1050
1200
945
1245
1415
1330
1445
1545
1645
1800
1000
1100
1400
1200
1500
1630
1015
1130
Page 2 ol 3
-------
Table 3-1
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLE
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Station ID
CS040
CS04I
CS042
CS043
CS044
CS045
CS046
CS047
CS048
CS049
CS050
CS05I
CS052
Station Description
Lake Rooseveli north of
Onion Creek
Jpper Columbia River
outhem tip of island
northwest of Onion Creek
Upper Columbia River
outhem tip of island south
of Squaw Creek
Upper Columbia River north
of Fivemile Creek
Upper Columbia River on
>each at Northport
Upper Columbia River north
of Big Sheep Creek
Upper Columbia River south
of Steamboat Rock
Upper Columbia River
northeast of Steamboat Rock
Upper Columbia River north
of Goodeve Creek
Upper Columbia River on
point bar southwest of
Scnver Creek
Upper Columbia River soulh
of Tom Bush Creek
Upper Columbia River at
"Black Sand Beach"
Upper Columbia River on
boulder bar near border
Sample Interval
(inches below
media surface)
0-2"
0-3"
0-2"
0-2"
0-4"
0-3"
0-1"
0-1"
0-3"
0-2"
0-2"
0-4"
0-3"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking #
01214138
01214140
01214142
01214144
01224150
01224151
01224154
01224155
01224157
01224160
01224162
01224163
01224164
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0926
MJ0927
M30928
MJ0929
MJ0930
MJ0931
MJ0932
MJ0933
MJ0934
MJ0935
MJ0936
MJ0937
MJ0938
Organic
CLP#
JX469
JX470
JX471
JX472
JX473
JX474
JX475
JX476
JX477
JX478
JX479
JX480
JX481
Internal
Sample ID
CR-041-SD
CR-042-SD
CR-043-SD
CR-044-SD
CR-045-SD
CR-046-SD
CR-047-SD
CR-048-SD
CR-049-SD
CR-050-SD
CR-051-SD
CR-052-SD
CR-053-SD
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
pesticide/P
CBs
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sample Date
23-May-Ol
23-May-Ol
23-May-Ol
23-May-Ol
31-May-Ol
31-May-Ol
31-May-Ol
31-May-Ol
31-May-Ol
l-Jun-01
l-Jun-01
l-Jun-01
l-Jun-01
Sample
Time
1245
1330
1400
1515
1045
1215
1430
1515
1630
930
1145
1230
1415
CP
Key
*
CLP
ID
pesticide
PCB
TAL
TOC
= Number
= Contract Laboratory Program
= Identification
= Chlorinated pesticides
= Polychlonnated biphenyls
= Target analyle lia
= Total organic carbon
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 10
1200 SIXTH AVENUE
SEATTLE, WA 98101
TARGET SHEET
The following document was not imaged.
This is due to the Original being
XX Oversized
CD Rom
_=== Computer Disk
Video Tape
Other:
**A copy of the document may be requested from the Superfund Records Center
*Document Information*
Document ID# 1150624
File #. 1.5
Site Name: Upper Columbia River (UCRSF^)
Figure 3-1 Upper Columbia Sample Location Map
-------
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
QA/QC data are necessary to determine precision and accuracy of analytical results and to
demonstrate the absence of interferences and/or contamination of sampling .equipment, glassware, and
jr§t&iV I- -f ^^ i( ^J?'',S "i*
o -,- i^^ • /- i • i • ff^msw ^VfV&*H:tis*'-
reagents. Specific QC requirements for laboratory analysis arerjncorporated in^T
Jp7' d*^ -
Laboratory Program (CLP) Statement of Work (SOW) for Inorganics Analysis (IL
CLP Statement of Work for Organics Analysis (OLM04.2; EBA^1999a)?and requiremeWsfliMafiri'the
"^IP1'
other EPA analytical methods and laboratory standard operafim|prc|||lures. These QC requirements or
other equivalent requirements were followed for analytical wprK^^^^^pn the upper Columbia River
ffi ^K^^-
ESI, unless otherwise noted. This section describes the QA/QC mea^^^^^S^fjpr the ESI and provides
an evaluation of the usability of data presented in
nine sediment samples collected from the sandj
A
Smelter can be found in the Upper Columbi(j$River Minjjsar,
Inspections Report (E & E 2002a).
.detailed disWsi6n of QA/QC for the
~^Sf
a^as at Le Roi/Northport
'iminary Assessments and Site
:1, Inc., of Huntsville, Alabama, and at
SOW ILM04.1 (EPA 2000). Inorganics
Inorganic analyses, TAL meteliy'were performed at
mr 4^ -^
DataChem Laboratories of SalJsLaMCity, UtaM^^o^M^
analyses ^^^^^ere P61^^^^^^^011'1 ^-•r^^^^y^ca^ (NCA) of Bothell, Washington, following
EPA SW-8'46^^ftd9060^^^Skprganics analyses for VOCs, SVOCs, and pesticide/PCBs were
performed by Con
conducted
OLM04.£(EPA 1999a)!
r^h Carolina. Additional pesticide/PCBs analyses were
: Island. All organics analyses followed CLP SOW
LABORATORY/ANALYSES
A total of 190 samples (179 soil/sediment, 11 water) were submitted to CLP laboratories
i
;'
(Sentinel, DataQhem) for TAL metals analysis Ninety-seven soil/sediment samples were submitted to a
,..""«; -?' 'i '/ -—.<-", ••"i--'"
^ H-V i .- ,
commercial laboratory (NCA) for TOC analysis CLP laboratories (Compuchem, Mitkem) received
5 water samples for VOC analysis, 8 samples for SVOC analysis (3 soil/sediment, 2 water), and 109
samples for pesticide/PCBs analysis (100 soil/sediment, 9 water)
10 START-2\01020028\S772
4-1
-------
4.2 QA/QC SAMPLES
QA/QC samples included laboratory duplicate samples, matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike
duplicate (MSD) samples at a rate of one duplicate and one MS per 20 samples submitted to CLP
laboratories for metals analysis. For organics and TOC analyses, QA/QC samples included MS and
MSD samples at a rate of one MS and one MSD per 20 samples submitted to CLP or commercial
laboratories.
4.3 DATA VALIDATION ;|Pft; '^fSjIfe.
All data from analyses performed at the CLP laboratories were reviewed ahSjvaliiiated by EPA
chemists or by chemists from their Environmental Services Assistanqe^Team contractor^fa^thjgjatter
case, EPA chemists provided a QA review of the data deliveraj)je^generated by the contractor. Data
"iSi&si®^*
qualifiers were applied as necessary according to the followii
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National^mmQnal GuidelineSffor Inorganic Data
Review (EPA 1994), - V
&r <$
USEPA Contract Laboratory Prograjn^'Natiorui^unSt^fim^GjXiaelinesfor Organic Data Review
(EPA 1999b), and Jf $' '^f8f%fr
*%f f*** JS' 5"
The Manchester EnvironmentaKLdborator^jQuality Assurance Manual (rev May 1995).
, ^cf
In the^bsence of otheri<2plpfuidance, metowa|peHific QC limits also were utilized to apply
qualifiers,^tlfesl'ftta. The^TKKi^reviewed'EPA^ata validation reports to check for consistency and
I'^^M^Hgjg^ v^^(S^^k
to add bias*qualifief*s^s necesslary^Results of these reviews and the associated data validation QA
'WSKAiSteSWSi. • 's. f"V) pHf^'A
^^^fp,^ ^Wf^j-
memoranda are prpyidecbyith the labjoratojry^forms in Appendix I.
AiSdvSiDfesSfe,. ""&&&''
4.4 jSATISFACTIONpFfDATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
r?'The laboratory data werei reviewed to ensure that the data quality objectives (DQOs) were met
for the project The following EPA guidance document was used to establish DQOs for the project:
" "Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund, Interim Final Guidance (EPA 1993)
4.4.1 Precision and Accuracy
Precision and accuracy measure the reproducibility of sampling and analytical methodology.
Precision is defined as the relative percent difference (RPD) between duplicate sample analyses The
10 START-2\01020028\S772
4-2
-------
laboratory duplicate samples measure the precision of the analytical method (both preparation and
analysis), and RPD values are reviewed for each sample delivery group and analyte Overall, the project
DQOs for precision were met.
Accuracy is defined as the MS and MSD percent recovery (%R) for each analysis. Together,
laboratory MS/MSD samples and native spike samples measure the accuracy of the analytical method.
The %R values were reviewed for all appropriate sample analyses. Overall, the project DQOs for
accuracy were met. - " "
,' - .;....V ..
4.4.2 Completeness •& r'v '-^''X-\:
Data completeness is defined as the percentage of usable data,(usable data divided by-total
>S ^, . ~'' '">
possible data). All laboratory data were reviewed for data validation,and usability. All of the data, with
•*!?' 'S> . /V
,•?'} --.Cj- /.' „>• -
the exception of one result for mercury (which was rejected due^to^low percent solids), were determined
'•?" \'^)'\'ifC/'^
to be usable; therefore, the project DQO for completeness of 90% wa's r|iet:>(.',Yv;
rJ
4.4.3 Representativeness
fff^ ffl ^^T^^?^?'^ v
Data representativeness expresses the'degree to.;>vhichf§jraple.?<:iata accurately and precisely
represent the characteristic of a populat|c)rJ!parameter variations^ a"sampling point, or an environmental
condition. The number and selectionfofsa'mples^were determined in the field to accurately account for
site variations and sample matrices^The DQOs'fpjr^represfentativeness were met.
4.4.4
Comparability is'a qualitative parameter expressing the confidence with which one data set can
be compared to,a^pthfrs^ata^produced;'fpr this project followed applicable field sampling techniques
and specified analytical methodology. Therefore, the DQOs for comparability were met.
4.5 LABORATORY AND FIELD QA/QC PARAMETERS
The laboratory data also were reviewed for holding times and blank sample analysis These
QA/QC parameters are summarized below. In general, these parameters were considered acceptable
4.5.1 Holding Times
All samples met EPA, Region 10, and method specific holding time criteria
10START-2\01020028\S772 4-3
-------
4.5.2 Initial and Continuing Calibration
With few exceptions, all initial and continuing calibration, and check sample acceptance criteria
were met. Following are those analytes whose concentrations were qualified as estimated (J) due to QC
exceedances. 4-chloroaniline (2 samples), 2,4-dimtrophenol (2 samples), benzo(k)fluoranthene
(2 samples), indeno(c,d-l,2,3)pyrene (2 samples), hexaclorocyclopentadiene (2 samples), and
pentachlorophenol (2 samples). All atrazine results (4 samples) were rejected Jjased on;QC check failure
4.5.3 Laboratory Blanks
All laboratory blanks met frequency criteria. The following COGS' were detecleja'-jnithe
laboratory blanks associated with metals and organic
?*v
^ V ^ r
" .ujn, calcium, copper, iron, lead,
Metals - Antimony, arsenic, aluminum, berylljyurri,fc|
manganese, silver, sodium, thallium, and vanadium!*
Organic Compounds - Acetone, methyl^al^Ste, di-n-1
bis(2-hexylethyl)phthalate.
ithaate', and
^' J? 'Iffipf
Any associated sample result less than five times the bVai^$pntarnination were qualified as not
detected (U). Associated sample resul^^'re quali|jevd as estimated quantities (J or UJ) if the sample
result was less than five times the absolute value .of the negative blank concentration.
4.5.4
Tr
';
Durihgj|^;ESI,^two triplBlan^samples and five rinsate samples were collected. No analytes
were detected above sample quantitation^liniits (SQLs) in any trip or rinsate blank.
fi'feS&aSi^i; \f&fci«V v ^c. / j r
10 START-2\01020028\S772
4-4
-------
5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORTING AND BACKGROUND SAMPLES
This section describes the reporting and methods applied to analytical results presented in
•y>> '
Section 6 of this report, and discusses background sediment samples. A list %6f all samples collected for
.» •. * t ••' *a '
laboratory analysis is presented in Table 3-1. |C'^'"N """"• ?*>";<*
»{. hv ' ' l' >:•*,'r <;' '-., ', •>.
r'-rv' t,''•'!*.> „."»'•,.'-,'
&t ?** •"'./WS'^V
Ar '*" s''.t*".V ''
5.1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , ' r '; ;; f,
V',',.»'> "* ?T * Jj '•,"''>
Analytical results presented in the data summary tabl|s$iri flection 6 show all analytics'detected
above laboratory detection limits in bold type. The analytical r||p^£sediment samples collected from
the upper Columbia River project area (i.e., CS004 through^6S052f Sfe|e6-compared to background
concentrations. Analytical results indicating signific^^i%Ptrations^o|v^9^a^nants m sediment
samples with respect to background concentrations aVe^sHbwnTSnderlined and.'ih bold type. The
i1"**»'" ^ysspl^lHS^)?,. jf'
analytical summary tables present all detected^rialytes^howe^^Ws^ROrt only discusses significant
concentrations for a limited set of analytesf«specificalljH:he metatelarseriic, cadmium, copper, lead,
^ff *$• M
mercury, and zinc. For purposes of thi|*ifiyestigati6n, significant/elevated concentrations are defined,
using criteria in Table 2-3 of the EPJyHRS; Final Rule for determining observed releases (i.e., significant
or elevated concentrations), a^Jfollojvs: 'if^HWt^*''
" ;Equairtqvor greater than^the sample's contract required quantitation limit
(GRQl;)/cpntract required detection limit (CRDL) or the SQL when a non-CLP
Equal to or greater than the background sample's CRQL/CRDL or SQL when the
background concentration is below detection limits; or
» 'i ~ ^f
At least three times greater than the background concentration when the background
concentration equals or exceeds the detection limit.
, ; : For analytical results that are qualified as estimated, the sample concentration was adjusted as
described in Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination
(EPA 1996a) before determination of whether the concentration is significant or elevated. All hazardous
substances detected at target locations and meeting evaluation criteria can be used to document an
observed release from the site to the target/receptor
10START-2\01020028\S772 ' 5-1
-------
5.2 DATA PRESENTATION
Based on QC data provided by the laboratory, analytical results can be qualified during data
validation. The following data qualifiers were used:
B
H
J
K
L
NJ
— Detected inorganic concentration is below the method reporting limit
(MRL)/CRDL but is above the instrument detection limit. iV«j
Q —
R —
— High bias.
— The analyte was positively identified, bin the associat^lriumerical value is an
estimated quantity because QC criteria Vere not met or't/ecausejConcentrations
reported are less than the quantitation=limit or lowest calitirafionfistalidard ,4'
r * *4f*y-> c***- ^r,^ ••ijwr *iY(j.iJjA'«*j r * "-,7"
— Unknown bias. ^HSb,. -^;.
— Low bias.
»s
%,that,has been "tentatively
"EW4?sk. .
presents ;its approximate
SS¥
The analysis indicates the presencefpf an ;
identified" and the associated numerical
concentration.
ij Jl , _.„- .v *.
The detected organic concenYfaB'qnt,s1b^low the MRL/CRQL, but is above the
method detection lumj*'' -^'
QC indicates thatjplta are unusable (cornpSund may or may not be present).
Resampling a|f|f£analysjj||ire necessary for verification.
— The compound was analy'zed for, tyffmot detected.
r aw .»,!..M*i, .!«v*i,v
nd was anaTyzeH^pf, but was not detected; the associated
jmit is an estimate because QC criteria were not met.
5.3 BACKGR't
FopsHRS purposeSftb^cKground sediment samples are typically collected from locations upstream
4y- -,* -•• W -*jf '""J1,^"-*.
of potential sources of coritarhinatipri and upstream of areas of known sediment contamination. For
purposes of this ESI, EPA identified Lower Arrow Lake in Canada as an ideal location for the collection
of background sediment samples (see Figure 2-2). Lower Arrow Lake is upstream of potential sources of
contamination to the Columbia River and areas of known sediment contamination south and north of the
U.S.-Cahada border Since Spring of 2001, EPA made repeated requests to the Canadian Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) for permission to conduct sampling at Lower Arrow
Lake in Canada To date, DFAIT has not granted EPA permission to conduct the proposed sampling
10 START-2\01020028\S772
5-2
-------
(Appendix J). For this reason, existing data for a sediment sample collected from Lower Arrow Lake by
Ecology in May 2001 will be used as the background sediment sample for this report (Ecology 2001;
Appendix K).
5.3.1 Background Sample Location and Description
The background sediment sample collected by Ecology from Lower Arrow Lake in Canada was
determined to be located at latitude 49°20.379' and longitude 117°52 452' usiriguGPS data (NAD83
datum; see Figure 2-4). The sample was collected 20 feet off the.left bank and 0?1 mile ".upstream of a
boat ramp. The depth of water was estimated to be 7 feet (Ecology 2001).-y* " '^1^-1,. »
5.3.2 Background Sampling Method
The sediment sample was collected using a 0.1 squarelme^^^ip^en grab sampler. The van
Veen grab sampler was lowered three times and the top 10 centirteter4ay'e1^oj|'each grab was removed
with a stainless steel spoon or scoop, placed in a stainle'ssTsteel'ibowl, andvnomQgenized by stirring. The
"V
homogenized sediment was placed in an 8 ounce"glass container .with a Teflon lid liner. The glass
f^/*" fy- •'''*$&. "^sV^^K •*-*jx
container was precleaned to EPA QA/QC spjcihcations'>tEc'ol^^2pb!ip''
Stainless steel implements used'tpjcbllect the .sediment s,ample were cleaned by washing with
Liquinox detergent, followed by sequential rinse&jvith tap wajer, 10% nitric acid, and deionized water.
The equipment was then air-dried antf wrapped'ihlalurninum foil. Between-sample cleaning of the van
•& 4-Sj^ $*3 • •? (>""J'W**iNS&Mt/'
Veen grab sampler consisted'ipfjhorough brushing and'rinsing with on-site water. (Ecology 2001)
*&»""
Puget Sound Estuary Prptpcojs]procedures (EPA 1996b) for collection, preservation,
transportation,'and-storage of the seaimenVsample were followed in an effort to limit sources of bias.
"*" '.. * "'V* t*'~i5> W "' r J*1 ^' * '
The sediment samplelvmlpiabed on iceummediately after collection and transported to the Ecology/EPA
••«!:!«• *u!^i;t;-'^f^'^5VlSsl
-------
5.3.4 Data Quality
Chemical data relating to the 2001 Ecology study met laboratory QC analysis requirements
(Table 5-1). QC samples for the chemical analysis included a laboratory duplicate, one MS, one MSD,
method blanks, and laboratory control samples. A laboratory triplicate analysis was conducted for grain
size. (Ecology 2001)
MS recovery values for the metals data were consistently near 100%, indicating little or no bias
due to possible sample matrix interference (Ecology 2001). _,.-. A.?'-&,*-"£
v^P'rii''" "'•? "'^ty ^' '" z>
Replicate field samples were compared to determine thejgverall precision^Qfsthe^data (sampling
techniques and laboratory analysis). The RPD for each replicate was well|^'itm'nTh||]^©^f,25%.,'>V'"
(Ecology 2001) gf^ 4$* ^^^fl^p"
5.3.5 Background Sediment Sample Analytical Results^
Analytical results of sediment sample 01198040 collected by'Ecology?in May 2001 are presented
in Table 6-1.
10 START-2\01020028\S772
5-4
-------
Table 5-1
ANALYTICAL METHODS, REPORTING LIMITS, AND LABORATORIES
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Analysis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
-ead
Vlercury
Zinc
roc
% Solids
Grain Size
Reporting Limit
4 mg/kg, dry
0 5 mg/kg, dry
1 mg/kg, dry
3 mg/kg, dry
0 003 mg/kg, dry
0 5 mg/kg, dry
01%
01%
01%
Method
ICP/AES - EPA 3050B/6010B
ICP/AES - EPA 3050B/6010B
ICP/AES - EPA 3050B/6010B
ICP/AES - EPA 3050B/6010B
CVAA- EPA 7471 A/245 5
ICP/AES - EPA 3050B/6010B
Combustion/CO2 - EPA (1996)
Gravimetric - EPA (1996)
Sieve & Pipet - EPA (1996)
Laboratory
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Rosa Environmental
Key
% = Percent
AES = Atomic emission spectroscopy
CO2 = Carbon dioxide
CVAA = Cold vapor atomic absorption specfroscopy
EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
ICP = Inductively coupled argon plasma
mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram
TOC = Total Organic Carbon
5-5
-------
Note This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The following sections describe the results of samples analyzed by EPA.CLP methods.
Analytical results presented in this section were evaluated accordjng to criteria as previously described in
A'1"^-' '<•''•*••.
subsection 5.1. iTO1-5 .?:-'<"•:'*>-?
6.1
SAMPLE LOCATIONS 8%.-,.s$" " '^^ '
A total of 49 sediment samples were collected from tM;ri|TOe|]Columbia River (CSOd4 to CS052)
>
to determine whether hazardous substances are present in thiswBkfpf^ejiyer at significant
•fjftp' XK'^X '• J\K
concentrations relative to background concentrations. The portion of Tthb*river?addressed in this report,
referred to as the upper Columbia River, extends apprdximafetyJO RMs through northeast Washington
^^Ipsflk n"-
from the U.S -Canada border to approximately RM*675 fieafMclifuium, Washington, in Lake Roosevelt
4F
(see Figure 2-2). A brief description of each.s'ample locationls:proyide^*in Table 3-1. Sample locations
F ,|,f F /*' 1^?^
are presented in Figure 3-1. ^/ ' ff^
Nine sediment samples (NSJSpfiSD through NSSLOQ^b) were collected from the sand
bar/beach and boat launch areas.along the Columbia River adjacent to the Le Roi/Northport Smelter
...ik j$fe&1 :%-$8$&f$f'
(Figure 2-3}.ls*The samples,.werevc61lected within'the^overland surface water drainage routes identified by
0 /»?»*V'. < i-^i»t«"w\ '«<*i*5>v^ ° J
.- n » % '-
E &E, The"*samples were collect to determine potential contamination associated with this source in
'• '.^ £-',— ••?- *f.»'.*uV f r
:, .. ; ,<.*'. ^e^.i',., . -1
the Columbia River: 'The samples appeared to consist of dark brown to black medium sand. No odor or
'^-••yAH,:-.' .tV;vv->'
'
staining was noted/during'sample collection.
'
6.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Analytical results indicate that all six metals of concern, consisting of arsenic, cadmium, copper,
lead, mercury, and zinc, were detected at significant concentrations at multiple locations throughout the
upper Columbia River Table 6-1 presents results for all TAL metals detected and Figures 6-1 and 6-2
provide data results for arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc at each sample point for
sample locations CS004 through CS052
Antimony was detected at significant concentrations at 27 locations ranging from 1 5 mg/kg to
61 3 mg/kg Arsenic was detected at significant concentrations at 51 locations ranging from 2 8 mg/kg to
10START-2\OI020028\S772 6-1
-------
42 8 mg/kg. Barium was detected at significant concentrations at 37 locations ranging from 105 mg/kg to
2,150 mg/kg Cadmium was detected at significant concentrations at 40 locations ranging from
1 5 mg/kg to 11 1 mg/kg. Chromium was detected at significant concentrations at 15 locations ranging
from 38 0 mg/kg to 165 mg/kg. Cobalt was detected at significant concentrations at 12 locations ranging
from 10.6 mg/kg to 59.0 mg/kg. Copper was detected at significant concentrations at 56 locations
ranging from 11.8 mg/kg to 3,300 mg/kg. Iron was detected at significant conc'entrations"at all 58
locations ranging from 8,630 mg/kg to 245,000 mg/kg. Lead was .detected at;|ignificant concentrations at
51 locations ranging from 64.9 mg/kg to 1,590 mg/kg. MagnesiuirFwas detect^apsignificant
concentrations at 49 locations ranging from 5,190 mg/kg to 26,600 mg/kg* wMangah%£eJ)ras"vdetected at
significant concentrations at 58 locations ranging from 181 mg/kg to 4^360 mg/kg. Merc|j[^|^s*detected
at significant concentrations at 28 locations ranging from 0.13^mg^cg'tc»J.7 mg/kg. Potassium was
detected at significant concentrations at 40 locations ranging,^6rrM|^)^gj3cg to 4,260 mg/kg.
Selenium was detected at significant concentrations at 13 locations rah*gi^Ji|^)n^.l mg/kg to 4.5 mg/kg.
Silver was detected at significant concentrations at 24yOGMionWanging fromtitf^mg/kg to 12.6 mg/kg.
i-S*?^!, A$^i«*&J$M£$ta*J'*. ""^f~ %^i r
Thallium was detected at significant concentrations^! foumocatioris ranging" from 2.3 mg/kg to 4.6
0 ,£«•** ?!a
4t*" ,W
mg/kg. Vanadium was detected at significan|rl6cations ranging from 84.2 mg/kg to
24,900 mg/kg.
Estimations of grain size we|e performed .yisuallyjmd recorded at all sediment sampling stations.
The grain sizeheistimates indicate/thatc river sampling'stations averaged 54% total fine-grained sediment
(silt and clay/i.e^'Tines"), and^fs^lptal sand. Grain size estimates for sample locations CS004 through
CS052 are incfu§ed?in%ppendix'JE^ftjJsffc.
- t,^f,$f~,jf-ff ~'£ £i r3
10 START-2\01020028\S772
6-2
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01204110
MJ08ZO
JX433
CS004
01204111
MJ08Z1
JX434
CS005
01204112
MJ08Z2
JX435
CS006
01204113
MJ08Z3
JX436
CS007
01204114
MJ08Z4
JX437
CS008
01204115
MJ08Z5
JX438
CS009
01204116
MJ08Z6
JX439
CS010
01204117
MJ08Z7
JX440
CS011
01204118
MJ08Z8
JX441
CS012
Metals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Banum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
13700
1.5 JL
77U
230
3.6
5970
30.1
85JB
48.5 JL
23400
219
6990
719
0.66
24.6
2570 JL
1 3U
1 7JB
345 JB
15U
36.9
523
12100
1 6JB
81 U
269
4.0
7670
29.8
8 1 JB
41.6 JL
22300
238
7720
533
0.49
24.1
2230 JL
12U
16JB
359 JB
14U
36.2
600
4430
0 76 UJK
22U
422JB
012JB
4420
8.8
33JB
10.4 JL
8630
6.2
3140
IM
006U
96JB
763 JL
087U
048JB
197 JB
099U
17.3
36.8
4700
0 85 UJK
40U
57.4
033JB
2510
15.7
36JB
11.8 JL
14400
21.5
2760
267
007U
105JB
672 JB
096U
071 JB
200 JB
1 1U
27.7
77.9
8240
097 JB
51U
105
073JB
13200
23.3
69JB
22.5 JL
16600
24.4
5990
376
008U
21.0
1770 JL
1 1 U
094JB
289 JB
1 3U
32.0
99.0
7440
0.65 UJK
6.6
61.1
025JB
3350
20.4
67JB
21.9 JL
16500
16.7
4860
250
005U
21.0
1070 JB
074U
085JB
231 JB
085U
27.9
90.9
21200
0 63 UJK
5.0
227
4.4
4920
14.0
58JB
33.9 JL
14300
86.6
3220
347
0.14
14.4
1400 JL
072U
076JB
287 JB
082U
26.7
230
14300
36JB
13.7
512
8.1
14100
35.7
94JB
91.7 JL
28300
464
11200
808
L7
27.0
2520 JL
1 5U
27JB
406 JB
17U
39.9
1060
14300
3.3 JL
14.9
596
9.4
15900
35.9
94JB
86.8 JL
29600
535
12400
698
0.97
27.4
2500 JL
14U
27JB
429 JB
17U
40.6
1210
Page 1 of 8
-------
ON
I
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01204119
MJ08Z9
JX442
CS013
01204120
MJ0900
JX443
CS014
01204121
MJ0901
JX444
CS015
01204122
MJ0902
JX445
CS016
01204124
MJ09E2
JX5SO
CS017
01204125
MJ0904
JX447
CS018
01204126
MJ0905
JX448
CS019
01204127
MJ0908
JX451
CS020
01214102
MJ0907
JX450
CS021
Metals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Janum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
^ead
Vlagnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
12800
32JB
19.0
755
11.1
27000
25.9
74JB
73.4 JL
26800
841
18100
515
1.6
21.9 J
1970 JL
083U
19JB
301JB
095U
38.5
1460
15400
4.1 JL
123
468
7.5
12100
38.0
10 JB
111JL
29400
440
10300
610
1.0
28.5
2680 JL
17U
29JB
490 JB
1 9U
42.4
1000
9120
1 5JB
6.2
229
3.4
7040
21.1
59JB
49.2 JL
16800
190
6130
294
0.54
16.5
1630 JL
076U
14JB
249 JB
087U
25.8
470
13600
1.5JB
8.5
261
3.8
7150
28.6
87JB
73.0 JL
23800
162
7240
572
0.31
24.0
2290 JL
084JB
17JB
248 JB
080U
37.2
462
15600
0.72 UJK
2.8
175
143 JB
5560
9.4
40JB
15.6 JL
11500
26.8
2970
315
0.06 U
92JB
1060 JB
082U
032JB
381 JB
094U
19.2
84.2
8180
1.7 JL
7.8
422
4.9
12400
18.9
54JB
40.6 JL
17400
232
8970
337
0.43
16.6
1490
077U
078JB
242 JB
089U
24.2
581
11900
2.1 JL
45JB
231
14JB
9340
20.4
74JB
41.8 JL
20400
64.9
7000
392
014U
187JB
2020 JB
1 9U
075JB
480 JB
22U
267JB
250
6670
54JB
6.8
180
18JB
7630
17.0
54JB
66.7 JL
15500
72.7
5610
303
0 13 U
136JB
1270 JB
19U
1 1 JB
426 JB
22U
202JB
455
12800
3.6 JL
9.5
364
6.5
8230
33.1
92JB
88.2 JL
25200
441
8200
673
1.2
25.9
2440
1 5U
20JB
471 JB
1 8U
35.8
901
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01214104
MJ0909
JX452
CS022
01214106
MJ0910
JX453
CS023
01234124
MJOBK4
JX804
CS024
01214108
MJ0911
JX454
CS025
01214114
MJ0914
JX456
CS026
01214110
MJ0912
JX455
CS027
01214112
MJ0913
JX456
CS028
01214116
MJ0915
JX458
CS029
01214118
MJ0916
JX459
CS030
Vletals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
3anum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
0 0004 U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
11600
3.4 JL
10.3
240
5.9
7740
30.4
79JB
67.6 JL
22400
282
7930
392
0.90
232JB
2280 JB
20U
15JB
623 JB
23U
33.7
617
10400
10JB
4.2
190
1.6
5470
25.7
82JB
53.9 JL
18000
93.8
6150
392
0.25
23.0
2390
068U
098JB
186 JB
078U
32.1
280
6430
089U
4.0
494JB
009U
2280
13.6
40JB
8.8
12900 JK
7.1
3640
191
0.08 U
13.3
910 JB
10U
047JB
219 JB
1.2 U
24.7
34.5
9920
49JB
10.6
505
4.3
21200
25.0
79JB
120 JL
27500
211
13800
528
0.49
21.4
1960JB
18U
20JB
483 JB
2 1 U
30.5
855
8000
48JB
9.5
375
2.9
16600
21.9
77JB
118 JL
23000
159
11100
411
0.20
18.0
1560 JB
12U
18JB
354 JB
14U
25.6
940
9090
13JB
34JB
113
029JB
4800
21.1
60JB
25.0 JL
16000
21.3
5190
284
009U
16.2
1380 JB
13U
052JB
385 JB
15U
29.0
1o4
12400
39JB
9.7
370
2.8
16100
30.1
96JB
114 JL
29000
149
11900
589
017JB
24.8
2480
16U
17JB
397 JB
19U
36.7
"' '
787
7150
19JB
7.0
342
3.2
11500
17.7
50JB
65.7 JL
15900
208
7940
256
0.53
14.1
1250
068U
15JB
200 JB
078U
21.4
600
11200
47JB
11.1
r— "—
624
7.2
20500
30.6
90JB
205 JL
26800
369
14200
388
Li
23.1
1820
1.1
3.1
258 JB
080U
33.1
1250
Page 3 of 8
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01214120
MJ0917
JX460
CS031
01214122
MJ0918
JX461
CS032
01214124
MJ0919
JX462
CS033
01214128
MJ0921
JX464
CS034
01214126
MJ0920
JX463
CS035
01214130
MJ0922
JX465
CS036
01214132
MJ0923
JX466
CS037
01214134
MJ0924
JX467
CS038
01214136
MJ0925
JX468
CS039
Metals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Banum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
ron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
6940
21.5 JL
11.5
533
4.3
26300
29.9
107JB
387 JL
36300
256
11800
661
0.40
16.0
1440JB
16JB
3.4
374 JB
16JB
23.6
2560
9410
47JB
8.7
295
3.5
15400
26.4
86JB
387 JL
24700
165
10200
481
0.19
21.1
1900
097JB
21 JB
266 JB
084U
29.4
1030
9240
70JB
13.0
618
6.9
26100
29.4
90JB
251 JL
28900
392
15300
435
0.73
^— — -
20.9
1620
1.2
3.2
269 JB
092U
30.2
1660
8720
57JB
10.7
391
3.6
19600
25.8
86JB
156 JL
25500
190
12800
545
0.32
193
1760
069U
2.2
207 JB
079U
28.6
1100
8540
22JB
7.9
255
2.3
10800
23.4
73JB
76.8 JL
19800
112
8570
467
0.16
19.1
1610
068U
12JB
237 JB
078U
283
592
8790
108JB
10.4
438
2.8
22300
28.1
10.6
309 JL
42300
209
10300
946
0.16
15.0
1400
1.4
2.1
384 JB
081 JB
27.1
3090
18900
17.2 JL
26.9
1070
2.8
49600
59.1
22.3
1460 JL
176000
1590
7230
3390
007JB
10.3
3620
068U
4.0
1310
4.0
39.0
24900
12400 JL
104JB
17.3 JH
603 JK
2.1
28900 JL
35.1 JL
15.1 JL
823
109000 JL
784 JL
5020 JL
2090 JL
0.13
8.5
2300 JL
4.2
2.9
723 JB
2.4
29.5 JL
13900
4950 JL
34JB
9.6 JH
768 JK
5.3
46900 JL
12.5 JL
41 JB
102
25000 JL
289 JL
25000 JL
442 JL
0.29
10.9
883 JB
082JB
063JB
228 JB
1 1 JB
23.0 JL
1990
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01214138
MJ0926
JX469
CS040
01214140
MJ0927
JX470
CS041
01214142
MJ0928
JX471
CS042
01214144
MJ0929
JX472
CS043
01224150
MJ0930
JX473
CS044
01224151
MJ0931
JX474
CS045
01224154
MJ0932
JX475
CS046
01224155
MJ0933
JX476
CS047
01224157
MJ0934
JX477
CS048
Metals (nig/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Sanum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
rhallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
6520 JL
19.2 JL
9.1JH
452 JK
1.9
24700 JL
27.1 JL
12.0 JL
362
37600 JL
172 JL
9750 JL
743 JL
008JB
11.1
1330 JL
1.8
2.1
377 JB
12JB
21.5 JL
2770
6550 JL
17.2 JL
8.7 JH
495 JK
2.1
28200 JL
32.8 JL
13.7 JL
451
48200 JL
175 JL
9960 JL
908 JL
007JB
10.2
1260 JL
2.1
2.2
475 JB
078U
21.4 JL
3760
9280 JL
20.7 JL
13.9 JH
,_ 632 JK
1.6
26500 JL
44.8 JL
17.7 JL
720
79700 JL
446 JL
5520 JL
1500 JL
0.13
9.6
1740 JL
3.2
3.9
666 JB
2.3
26.2 JL
8710
15500 JL
27.1 JL
20.3 JH
1140JK
1.6
46900 JL
76.8 JL
35.2 JL
1550
137000 JL
1040 JL
5780 JL
3060 JL
006JB
12.2
3750 JL
4.5
5.7
1660
4.6
39.2 JL
15000
21100
53.5
25.5
2160
006JB
69900
142
59.0
2900 JL
239000
316
5770 JL
4040
005U
17.0
4300
0 68 UJK
7.5
2210
078 U
42.3
20100
4710
99JB
7.6
486
4.8
54000
20.7
84JB
245 JL
28000
199
26600 JL
585
006JB
10.4
888 JB
0 67 UJK
16JB
269 JB
077U
22.1
2430
17400
57.5
30.3
1970
007U
57600
135
73.5
2520 JL
176000
409
5040 JL
3680
006U
15.6
3580
1.4 JL
10.2
2230
087U
39.1
17500
17800
45.2
21.6
1690
019JB
66400
112
47.3
2160 JL
178000
417
10000 JL
3240
005U
14.4
3490
0 68 UJK
7.4
1610
078U
37.7
18200
18100
34.9
30.3
1660
006U
58600
113
33.8
2160 JL
179000
317
6030 JL
3130
005U
13.0
3480
1.4JL
5.9
1530
076U
36.3
16500
Page 5 of 8
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
01224160
MJ0935
JX478
CS049
01224162
MJ0936
JX479
CS050
01224163
MJ0937
JX480
CS051
01224164
MJ0938
JX481
CS052
01264431
MJOGPO
NA
NSSL01SD
Metals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Janum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
ron
^ead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
18700
74JB
7.6
681
006U
46900
64.0
15.0
997 JL
165000
282
5750 JL
2950
005U
81 JB
3770
2.1 JL
3.7
1050
079U
38.2
15400
8170
20.0
11.8
763
IA
25300
30.2
79JB
444 JL
67100
309
8540 JL
1080
0.29
12.5
1400
1.4 JL
2.7
385 JB
091U
28.8
4900
21100
61.3
42.8
2440
006U
72400
165
85.7
3300 JL
245000
512
5970 JL
4360
005U
19.4
4330
0 68 UJK
12.6
2630
078U
45.0
22300
11000
51.4
23.1
989
007U
30800
72.0
33.4
1330 JL
96900
276
3990 JL
1990
006U
13.6
2160
1.5 JL
8.5
1000 JB
089U
28.6
8820
6170
18.8 JL
7.5
255
1.6
29100 JL
18
74JB
238 JL
25000
230 JK
12300 JK
477
006U
84JB
1170JB
085U
19JB
463 JB
13U
20.8
1520
01264432
MJOGP1
NA
NSSL02SD
13400
40.1 JL
15
1270
081 JB
47600 JL
85
34.6
1540 JL
134000
246 JK
6900 JK
2540
006U
13.1
2800
091U
7.8
1430
14U
31.7
10500
01264433
MJOGP2
NA
NSSL03SD
15700
49.1 JL
19.3
1610
074JB
56000 JL
103
41.1
2070 JL
167000
292 JK
5960 JK
3140
007U
14.7
3340
091U
7.8
1760
14U
33.4
I307JO"
01264434
MJOGP3
NA
NSSL04SD
17800
44.9 JL
23.9
1910
1.5
63900 JL
121
45.9
2530 JL
193000
388 JK
5800 JK
3630
006U
15.8
3870
089U
8.2
1960
13U
36.5
I5IUB
01264435
MJOGP4
NA
NSSL05SD
19200
59.4 JL
41.4
2150
1.7
70200 JL
139
54.2
2960 JL
212000
507 JK
5830 JK
4130
006U
17.6
4260
086U
10.3
2400
13U
39.8
fi»9oT5
^—Page 6 of 8
-------
Table 6-1
COLUMBIA RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATA SUMMARY
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
STEVENS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EPA Sample ID
CLP Inorganic ID
CLP Organic ID
Station Location ID
Background
Metals (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
3anum
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Vlagnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
4UJ
20U
27.2
0.47
12.0 J
2.1
3.5
2650 J
11
1690 J
47.0
00004U
13.4
447 J
SOU
05UJ
SOU
5.93
26.9
01264436
MJOGP5
NA
NSSL06SD
7170
10.9 JB
10.9
582
3.3
33300 JL
25.9
98JB
349 JL
44900
470 JK
13900 JK
864
008JB
105JB
1570
099 U
28JB
807 JB
15U
28.6
3920
01264437
MJOGP6
NA
NSSL07SD
7250
19.2 JL
123
762
4.9
40500 JL
22.4
88JB
257 JL
35900
548 JK
18700 JK
617
Oil JB
14.7
1520
091 U
23JB
528 JB
14U
28.4
2800
01264438
MJOGP7
NA
NSSL07SD
7180
86JB
11.1
804
M
38400 JL
24.8
79JB
347 JL
54600
597 JK
15500 JK
1190
008JB
92JB
1450
1 1 JB
2.8
695 JB
14U
28.1
5430
01264439
MJOGP8
NA
NSSL08SD
7530
94JB
15.9
411
3.2
21300 JL
20
1I4JB
357 JL
54200
845 JK
6680 JK
1170
0.29
12.8
1830
083U
3.1
870 JB
13U
24.5
5280
Page 7 of 8
-------
Key
B = Detected inorganic concentration is below the method reporting limit/contract required detection limit but is above the
instrument detection limit.
CLP = Contract Laboratory Program
EPA = United Slated Environmental Protection Agency
H = High bias
ID = Identification
J = The analyte was positively identified, but the associated numerical value is an estimated quantity because quality control
criteria were not met or because concentrations reported are less then the quantitaUon limit or lowest calibration standard
J = The analyte was positively identified The associated numerical result is an estimate (Ecology 2001)
K = Unknown bias
L = Low bias
mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram
U = The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected
UJ = The analyte was not detected at or above the reported estimated result (Ecology 2001)
ON
I
Page 8 of 8
-------
Arm* 149
C«dn*um f«
ST "M
ar
Anenlc 77U
CtiMum 3.6
sr
Mercuy 066
zme 523
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in the Environment
7,000 14,000
Approximate Scale m Feet
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Source: Western 2002
EXPLANATION
A Station Location
/\/ Streams
(§> Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
U The compound was analyzed for, but not
detected.
B The result is below the Contract Required
Detection Limit.
Figure 6-1
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
RESULTS - ARSENIC, CADMIUM, COPPER, LEAD, MERCURY, AND ZINC
(SAMPLES CS004-CS023)
10/14/02
rw-,,™. u..
4U»* **<*** vy
10-START-2\01020028\fig 6-1
-11
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
CANADA
(International Bolder)
CS052
Artenk 231
Cadmium 007U
Ccpper 1.330 J
Lnd 276
Mercury 006U
Zinc 6.620
CS047 mg*g
21 e
Cadrrium 01BBJ
Copper 2.160 J
Lead 417
Mercury OOSU
Zinc 16.200
Arwnlc 426
Cadmium 006U
Copper 5.300 J
Mercury 0 05 U
Zinc 22,300
Copper 997 J
Utd 282
Mercury OOSU
Zinc 15,400
Anenlc 86J
CwMum 93
Coppei 102
Lead 288 J
Mercury 008BJ
Zhe 2,770
frank: 107
C*dmlum 36
SET
Mercury 0.32
Zkic 1.100
6,7
CdMum 35
Ccpper 1SOJ
Lnd 165
Mercury 016
Zhc 1.030
Amnte 11.9
Ctctrtum 4.3
Coppor M7J
LairJ 256
Mercury 040
Zhc 2,560
3.4 BJ
Cadrrtum 0.28 BJ
2SOJ
Lead 213
Mercury OOSU
Zhc 104
368
Mercury 11
Zhc 1,290
CaoMum
Copper
Le*d
Mercury
Zkic
U
01U
16 U
67J
ooau
423
106
4.3
Capper 120 J
Lead 211
Mercury 049
zinc ass
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
A Station Location
/\/ Streams
<§) Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
U The compound was analyzed for, but not
detected.
B The result is below the Contract Required
Detection Limit.
Ma;
Extent
02-0260 FigCS2of2al
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists In the Environment
Ssfittte. Wss**'i^!i.-1
7,000 14,000
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Figure 6-2
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
RESULTS - ARSENIC, CADMIUM, COPPER, LEAD, MERCURY, AND ZINC
(SAMPLES CS024-CSOS2)
Date:
10/14/02
Drawn by.
10.START-2\01020028\fig 6-2
6-13
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
7. TARGETS/RECEPTORS SURFACE WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY
7.1 SURFACE WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY
- *ip>"
Sediment contamination in the upper Columbia River has-been documentedvnear the U.S.-Canada
'
border at RM 745, and at sample intervals downstream to IncheliumT, WashingTt<^^tjRMj675. The
surface water pathway target distance limit (TDL) is defined^as the section'pf the u'ppeiu^o|umbia River
from RM 745 to RM 675. An observed release to the surfacetw'ater migration pathway'ha'sjfe
•S.&1. J)*. --At*3 r J >»£*JlSi .
r.£ ?.**i)L-Vr ^'%y*-
. River by the EPA (Section 6)
;ton (WRCC 2002). The
. The flow rate of
l cubic feet^||!cbnd (USGS 2002).
•*• T2P5~7*
documented by sampling and analysis of sediments in the
The average annual precipitation is 17.20 inches in
•;
2-year, 24-hour rainfall event for the area ranges from 1.41
xv^JSi
the Columbia River at the U.S.-Canada border ave
The upland drainage area is estimated to be 59,700'squa
&>? /?•"*
Surface water is used for domestic purposes, sujch^asTr^^^^pvestock watering, fire
protection, power generation, and commfcrci'al purposes within tjie surface water TDL (E & E 2000). The
average number of people per housinjpprn? in Steyjns and Feny'counties is 2.64 and 2.49, respectively
*k . „ , &&L . .<*•?•*'
tic intake;
(USCB2000). There are four
populatio^^^people an
^^pjKKwP5*WiLPB:W
17 people
not used for drinkjng;^atej
water!
imtoejnver in Stevens County serving an estimated
imestic iritakelpffiFerry County serving an estimated population of
intake is present at Kettle Falls (WSDH 2002). This intake is
naintained for emergency use to augment fire suppression
•r.*^
. Sinc^ph'er listed surface water intake applications did not specify the
source ofjjie surface wat^and|therefore were not counted in this estimate, the actual number of people
served'by drinking water mtalces.on the Columbia River may be higher.
-.Cy The whole of the upper Columbia River ESI study area is contained in the Lake Roosevelt
National Recreation Area. The Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area, comprising the lake and its
shorelines, attracts more than 1 million visitors per year. Recreational activities include boating,
swimming, hunting, fishing, and camping Lake Roosevelt, including the upper Columbia River and its
tributaries in the Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area, support a varied fish community that today is
considerably different from the native fish community of the early 1900s. Changes over time were
caused by the introduction of nonnative species and habitat alterations such as water pollution, the
10 START-2\01020028\S772
7-1
-------
damming of rivers, and reservoir drawdowns Today, there are possibly 28 native and 12 nonnative
species of fish that inhabit recreation area waters. (DOI 2000)
Between 1990 and 1996, the number of angler trips to Lake Roosevelt ranged from 171,725 to
594,508 per year Recreational fishing trips to Lake Roosevelt peaked in 1993 and have been declining
since. The decline was partly attributed to the dewatering of boat ramps during the 1996 drawdown that
prohibited anglers from accessing much of the reservoir. Walleye, rainbow trout, and kpkanee were the
fish most often caught and harvested by anglers (DOI 2000) The-state of Washmgion only tracks
sturgeon, salmon, and steelhead in its freshwater sport fishing data?*They listiha^4llturgeon were
$JF ^f/'^M5^/
harvested between Grand Coulee Dam and the Canadian border in 1998. N6"steemHadJand;salmon are
reported to have been harvested during the same time (WSDW^OOl)if"' ^^f^fc'''
Tribally sensitive areas of central importance to the Gplyil!^nfederated Tribe include those
areas used for ceremonial, cultural, traditional, subsistence oiSSSt^&^S^fposes. In 1891, the Colville
^iF ^^Mfeiiv
Tribes ceded the North Half of the Reservation to the U.S., including a^onici%f4he Columbia River,
TJ«j'"t9&!££3.^21ttai<,Vlt'p' v
but expressly reserved hunting and fishing rights in^Je^ejcededJands and'&efriyer. Section I of the
October 1996 Environmental Agreement betweenjthe TnbeW^ncfid|'e.»EPA recognized these rights.
Subsistence fish catch data for the tribe is npt*'available.^E &*]^pi^j||^
The Spokane Tribe and the ColyUJe Confederated TribeMfirid the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife are the primary agenciesfdifectly involved in managing the Lake Roosevelt fisheries. The
Spokane Tribe is coordinatingjjhe deyelopment^lli^
"**•£ '$K .sV-jt
^|6bsevelt fisheries plan, funded by the
Bonnevillejtower AdHiinist^Uori-m!cooperatioriwitmthe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,
&ji$$j$ji^ ^WK-^ * v
the Colville'Gonfederated Tribes And other involved parties
< • /-Xfr ;i.K jfC1 ^"^ %
'
Two kokanee salmon hatcheries are
operated by thPSpolcaneirribe and^ffie^Wasiiington Department of Fish and Wildlife to support the
'-
-------
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and bull trout (Salvelmus confluentus) are threatened The state of
Washington also lists peregrine falcons as endangered and the bald eagle as threatened (DOI 2000)
Peregrine nests have been found in the areas surrounding the Lake Roosevelt Reservoir. Use of
the area by peregrines normally occurs during spring and fall migrations. Peregrine falcon foraging and
nesting habitats are usually associated with tall cliffs near water. Their diet consists primarily of
waterfowl, shorebirds, and passerine species commonly found on and around lakes and streams
(DOI 2000) v ;,l",,
Bald eagles maintain a large overwintering population in the'area surrounding the Lake
$£&•'' ^ V ' s<.« V !^r yj; J- '•»
Roosevelt Reservoir from November through March annually|?More than:21-bald epg||jnests,are in the
* "* - ' f ^ *4 * it''* * i * * -I** * *• V
vicinity of the project area and bald eagles appear to be becoitsing mor^-productive each^y^r^A.1/'
maximum of 15 territories have been occupied in any one yearSsidjBagle habitat is usually associated
^I*w^@§?^ «Sii
with large bodies of water that provide an abundant source ofcfjo^^Bailis^eed primarily on fish,
waterfowl, and carrion.
Bull trout historically occupied a vast geograpfflcprj||bf the ColumBialRiver. Today the
remaining populations are isolated and remnant* iNative biu)|tnAit^iaye declined significantly in the last
10 years, in part due to predation by and competition wjui intfodp4j;|j|pcies such as walleye. If bull
trout are present, Lake Roosevelt and its,tributaries,c|n providejsuitable habitat. Bull trout typically
migrate from lakes in the fall to spay^^clear streams with flafgradient, uniform flow, and uniform
*p
gravel or small cobble. (DOI:
Addjffdftal sensitiyel
ik
Sments withWffieTuWace water TDL include 5.97 linear miles of
10 START-2\01020028\S772
7-3
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank
-------
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In the spring and summer of 2001, the EPA and its authorized contractors conducted an
investigation of hazardous substance contamination in the upper Columbia River beginning near
Inchelium, Washington, and extending approximately 70 RMs.upstream to trie.U;S'.;;Canada border. The
s&~' '• ' ^j •'{.JK^IH; c*''1.
site investigation involved an evaluation of 49 sediment samples collected along inte'rvalstwithin the
>'C ,;•'" '-uW *,( c--' -
upper Columbia River. The evaluation of the technical data'was^conducted using the EBAfed contamination extends from
sample point CS004 located near IncheUjum^ Washington to sample point CS052 at the U.S.-Canada
border. Concentration gradient map4fo?"copper,ilea'd, and zinfe?are presented as Figures 8-1 through 8-6.
These maps demonstrate that the cqiicentrations^f'thes^-three analytes tend to increase with distance
upstream. ,Tjtejhighest concentrations of copper."an'd zihcTwere found near the U.S.-Canada border with
elevated concentrations apprbxirhately'fyyp orders of magnitude over other elevated concentrations
located further '"do^stream. Concentrations',of cadmium, lead, and mercury tend to be highest near the
mining districyioS^^^^p^^r StevenlMounty.
E)uring the 200T'BPA sampling event, several sediment samples collected at the upper Columbia
River consisted of a visibly'dark glassy sandy mixture characterized by EPA field personnel as slag. Slag
is a^by-product of the smelting furnaces, principally black sand-size material, containing glassy
particulate matter and metals. The presence of slag in upper Columbia River sediment has been
documented by prior studies conducted by other federal and state agencies Canadian government staff
and Cpmincp personnel observed deposits of slag during a 1991 boat trip into the U.S. conducted for
purposes of examining slag and gypsum deposits m back eddy areas and on sand and gravel bars
(BC Environment 1991) The largest deposit of what appeared to be predominantly slag in Washington
10START-2\01020028\S772 8-1
-------
state was observed on the southwest side of a large sand/gravel bar located just north of Northport
Samples were collected at several locations for analysis (BC Environment 1991).
Potential sources of contamination to the upper Columbia River include industries such as
mining, milling, smelting, pulp, and others that have discharged hazardous substances into the river. A
discussion of operations and processes at the former Le Roi/Northport Smelter in Northport, Washington,
the Cominco Smelter in Trail, B.C., and the Celgar Pulp Mill in Castlegar, B.Cjs included in subsection
/;,;:'. -",»-.'
2.3. A discussion of active, inactive, and abandoned mines and trulls in Stevens Cpunty and Pend Oreille
County can be found in separate reports (E&E 2002; E&E 2001 )'&&'' ' ^S&M^U
i$f $ /"" :'k^%t^ t,
Other potential sources of contamination to the river include permitted waste|discharges in. the
x'f. •»"-" ^"^ -?kti£.~''i:~iY-'-~'''"'
Columbia River from the municipal wastewater treatment faciliUesjn.Castlegar and Trailj^t~G^;Sreepage
from an old landfill site and an old arsenic storage site locate~d.jUpJtreainkof the Cominco Smelter, and the
wastes from the cities of Colville and Chewelah, WashingtonjfdiscnaE
*jr 'v&jgK
(G3 Consulting 200 Ib)
:o4the Colville River tributary.
*K&
^
Results of the EPA site investigation in
source of contamination to the upper ColumbiajOveE Sr
.(gtominco smelterjjin Trail, B.C. is a primary
rationsjiave been underway in Trail,
B.C., since 1896 with the direct discharge pfjsTag to thejtSbluniBia^axelddiscontinued in mid-1995. Up
/& W. iPly '
to 145,000 tons of slag had been discharged'annually^'which moved downstream to settle out in slower
flowing, sandy areas. The environmentlreffects.J;>f/slag discharge to the river includes both chemical and
physical components. Chemical effects included^^asedjpads of heavy metals and potential
bioaccumulatipn and toxicity^prob^ejis in river^ofganisfhs. Physical effects include scouring of plant and
animal lifeTfrpm riyer; substrates*jaamage to gills and soft tissues of aquatic insects and fish, and
** •* ' J| '* ' *> -*•} '^i *,' --* •
smothering of habitat 'and food sources4}r(
200 kg/d of lead, 4 kg/d ofmercury, and 7,400 kg/d of zinc. Additionally, fertilizer plant operations
contributed up to 4 kg/d of mercury and 350 kg/d of zinc. A new lead smelter was commissioned in 1997
and became fully operational in 1999, reportedly providing improved air emission and effluent treatment
;V:'-;T'l;r.:;; '
controls.^-fcyVs"
Eleven domestic intakes and two municipal intakes serving approximately 1,473 people are
located within the area of contamination. Sport, subsistence, and commercial fishing is conducted within
the area of actual contamination The federal-endangered peregrine falcon, and the federal-threatened
10 START-2\01020028\S772
8-2
-------
bald eagle and bull trout use this area of the river Approximately 5 97 linear miles of wetlands are
located within the area of contamination. Sediment contamination is present within the Lake Roosevelt
National Recreation Area. The Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area, comprising the lake and its
shorelines, attracts more than 1 million visitors per year. Recreational activities include fishing, boating,
swimming, and camping. Between 1990 and 1996, walleye, rainbow trout, and kokanee were the fish
most often caught and harvested by anglers. In 1998, sturgeon were harvested between Grand Coulee
Dam and the U.S.-Canada border The area is also of economic and cultural significance to Native
American populations. Tribally sensitive areas of central importance to the tribes^include areas used for
&**$ ^ '- ,•>» -(.».!
s\*y l' ' * i' T » ^-i ^
cultural, ceremonial, traditional, subsistence, and economic purposes. Subsistence fishjng-niay constitute
' " ""*
a major portion of some residents'diets.
A 1994 study by USGS to determine concentrations o|ane|euryvand other metals in three fish
species (walleye, smallmouth bass, and rainbow trout) found,cjpn6entrafionsN9f mercury in the walleye
samples, at concentrations ranging from 0.11 mg/kg to 0.44 mg/kg. WKili^the^ederal Food and Drug
Administration standard of 1.0 parts per million wasrnb£.exce«led, the USQS^andI the WSDH issued a
fact sheet summarizing the study and advising thfe'public t^|ir|iit^nsurnptipn of Lake Roosevelt walleye
(E&E2000). jf ^
Additional concerns include potential threatjj to human health posed by exposure to slag on
beaches of the upper Columbia River^frphi inhalation, dermal Contact, ingestion of lake water, and direct
sediments^orfrom^ihhalationx6lFiatfbome sediment particles.
-fif,~X•;>•,?•<; -.-> "<;>«i>i,'./,',i-;Vs r
„ ^^^V^, .. 'V'-^^'^K , . , ,.
upper Columbia^]
dioxins and furans in sedimentjat'seyeral locations from the U.S.-Canada border leading into Lake
Roosevelt, further detailed investigation of the upper Columbia River under CERCLA is recommended
10START-2\01020028\S772 8-3
-------
Note. This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists In the Environment
Auui'oximale Scale in Feet
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry aid Stevens Counties, Washington
Source: Weston 2002,
EXPLANATION
/\/ Streams
0 Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
D 15.6-50mg/kg
A 50-100 mg/kg
+ 100-500mg/kg
* 500 - 3300 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
assoc ated numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
Figure 8-1
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED COPPER RESULTS (SAMPLES CS004-CSG23)
Dais
10/14/02
»*«t»f t ** u
10:START-2\01020028\fig 8-1
8-5
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
/\f Streams
<§) Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
D 15.6-50 mg/kg
A 50-100mg/kg
4- 100-500mg/kg
•Ar 500 - 3300 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists In the Environment
0 7JMO 14,000
Ai'initiniinate Scale in Feet
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Figure 8-2
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED COPPER RESULTS (SAMPLES CS025-CSOS2)
Date-
10/14/02
Drawn by-
10:START-2\01020028\fig 8-2
8-7
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
/\/ Streams
<§> Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
D 64.9 - 200 mg/kg
A 200 - 400 mg/kg
* 400 -1590 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
ecology and environment, inc.
hfcmattonal Specialists in the Environment
7.000 14.000
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Figure 8-3
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED LEAD RESULTS (SAMPLES CSQ04-CS023)
Date, 1 Drawn by
10/14/02
10:START-2\01020028\fig 8-3
8-9
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
/\/ Streams
(§> Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
D 64.9 - 200 mg/kg
A 200 - 400 mg/kg
* 400-1580 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists In the Environment
7,000 14,000
a!« ffl F«t
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Feny and Stevens Counties, Washington
Figure 8-4
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SOB NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED LEAD RESULTS (SAMPLES CS02S-CSOS2)
Dale:
10/14/02
Drawn by:
8-11
10-START-2\01020028\fig 8-4
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International Speclaflsb In the Environment
SMtUe. WuNnol
Annroitiinate Scale m Feet
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
/\/ Streams
<§) Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
O 84.2 - 500 mg/kg
A 500 • 1,000 mg/kg
+ 1,000-5,000 mg/kg
* 5,000 - 24,900 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associnted numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
Figure 8-5
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED ZINC RESULTS (SAMPLES CS004-CS023)
r\-*-
ASOIC
10/14/02
isiawii vy.
10:START-2\01020028\fig 8-5
8-13
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
Source: Weston 2002
EXPLANATION
/\/ Streams
<§> Town
Mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
D 84.2 - 500 mg/kg
A 500-1,000 mg/kg
+ 1,000 -5,000 mg/kg
* 5,000 - 24,900 mg/kg
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate.
Map Extent
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in the Environment
0 ^TfflO HMO
A tmrnTJmgrtB SC3l*? HI Fff^t
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION
Ferry and Stevens Counties, Washington
Figure 8-6
UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER SITE NORTHEASTERN WASHINGTON
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
SIGNIFICANT/ELEVATED ZINC RESULTS (SAMPLES CS025-CSOS2)
Date.
10/14/02
1/ioWii tff.
10:START-2\01020028\fig 8-6
8-15
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
9. REFERENCES
Cantox Environmental, Inc. (Cantox), July 12, 2000, Working Study Plan, Cominco Trail Operations,
British Columbia, Ecological Risk Assessment Program Year 2000, prepared for Cominco, Ltd.
Celgar Pulp Company (Celgar), 1994, Celgar Pulp Company, 19^^nnual'E^r,qn^ienjal Performance
Report. "ff -j$&. .-^Mf^
, 1992, Environmental Performance Report, Castlegaf, British Columbia, Celgar |?,ulp'Cpmpany.
Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of Canada Ltd^CGoli^nco), 1998, Cominco Limited^ Trail
Operations, 1997 Environmental Report. ^&£$*.
-, 1997, Cominco Limited, Trail Operations, 1996Anni$FEn$irfmff?ental Report.
*w "^8fik
-, 1991, Cominco Metals, Trail Operations, 1991 Slag Disposal^Op^i^Environmental and
Engineering Studies. ^^ 'viMati*^
Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E & E), Octobe
Preliminary Assessments and Site Insections
, April 2002b, Lower Pend Oreille
Report, Pend Oreille County.
, December 2000, Upper Colwfflffi. River/Mke Roose
r Mine and Mills
, Washington.
^Assessments and Site Inspections
River Mile 597 to 745, Preliminary
i RiverA
Assessment Report, WashinWon. Prepareiljfor the.Uhited States Environmental Protection
Agency Region 10.
Era, Brand^a^dfDave SefiS^®^OTber 18, 2bOlfEnvironmental Assessment Program, Washington
State Department ofE^^p^Ecology), correspondence to Dave Knight and Carl Nuechterlein,
Ecofogy^Teeiardine 200r-lTi^^obsevelt Sediment Toxicity Reassessment Report.
Gassaway, Joej^^^^|^^^2. wat^M?nager, Kettle Falls Water Department, Kettle Falls,
Washlngto^^llpl^^conversa^n regarding Columbia River municipal water intakes with Ben
Martich, EcologvlanajEnvironment, Inc., Seattle, Washington.
<£•, «*|j Si^Mv-''^*Si'yV&(*Li/*
G3 Consulting Ltd, June 2($$$Environmental Performance Review of the New KIVCET Lead Smelter
%-fi and Elimination of Slag Discharge: Assessment of Columbia River Receiving Waters, Summary,
i^| prepared for Cominco Ltd., Trail Operations.
- _'-,.. --» December 2001b, Assessment of Columbia River Receiving Waters, Final Report, prepared for
^r^T^ck-Corninco'Ltd., Trail, B.C.
Heritage; B.; 1981,' (Long-time resident of Northport) "Bill Heritage Story," Northport Pioneers,
' °pgsH85-194.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 1973, Precipitation Frequency Atlas of the
Western United States Volume IX - Washington, Silver Spring, Maryland.
10 START-2\01020028\S772
9-1
-------
Nener, J C 1992. Survival and water quality of bioassays on five species of aquatic organisms exposed
to slag from Corrunco's Trail operations, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Vancouver, B C
Northport Pioneers, 1981, Northport Pioneers .Echoes of the past from the Upper Columbia Country,
compiled by Northport Over Forty Club, Northport, Washington
Orlob, 1950, A Preliminary Survey of the Sources of Mining and Mill Waste Pollution in the Upper
Columbia River Basin and Lake Roosevelt, prepared for the Washington Water Pollution
Commission in cooperation with the United States Public Health Service and the British
Columbia Department of Health and Welfare. ^J,;;^ '"r
Province of British Columbia BC Environment (BC Env\ronment\pctoberd9^1^nvironmental
Protection Technical Report, File No. PE-2753. /fp^
M& ^Wi ,£?•'•''$•
-^''September 1993, DdiajQuality Objectives Process for Superfund, Interim Final Guidance,
T "*'"
EPA540/R-93/07lJf
, December 1990, Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule.
...
United.States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Wetland Delineation Maps, various dates
'-:r$^, . .^>*'"
United States Geologic Survey (USGS), 2002, http //waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/discharge
- ,, ,.' '•* "
,^ Contaminant Trends in Sport Fish from Lake Roosevelt and the Upper Columbia River,
Washington, 1994-1998, Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4024.
, August 1997, "Are Walleye from Lake Roosevelt Contaminated with Mercury9", Fact Sheet FS-
102-97, by Martha L Erwm and Mark D Munn, http://wa.water.usgs.gov/renorts/fs.102-97/.
10 START-2\01020028\S772
9-2
-------
, 1994, Sediment-Quality Analysis of Franklin D Roosevelt Lake and Upstream Reach of the
Columbia River, Washington, 1992, Open File Report 94-315, prepared in cooperation with the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USGS Report 95-195
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), December 2001, Lake Roosevelt Sediment Toxicity
Reassessment Report, Publication No 01-03-043.
, 2000, Screening Level Investigation of Water and Sediment Quality of Creeks in Ten Eastern
Washington Mining Districts with Emphasis on Metals, Publication No. 00-03-004, Robert
Raforth. 4'
-l t " * *
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WSDFW), February 20QlfWashmgton State Sport
Catch Report 1998. /fjj?~r' S*^ £:"''
, various dates, Habitats and Species Maps.
Washington State Department of Health (WSDH), July 200^
http://www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/dw/Our Main Page
J^iogX Drinking Wate||^^
wnload.htm
/data
-, 2000, Update from the Washington State Department
Roosevelt Caught Fish.
-, 1993, Cominco Slag in Lake Roosevelt, Revie
Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC), May
http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliRE1
Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON), 2001a, Upper Colu.
&$« nWi
iarding Consumption of Lake
urrent'.
ion Reco?4,fp>r Colville, Washington,
Expanded Site
Inspection Sampling and Qualit^surancejjjpn, TDDjpM)2-0001-A, EPA Contract: 68-SO-
01-02, prepared for the UnitedjStates Envkonmental Projection Agency Region 10. May 2001.
, 2001b, Sediment lnvestigatiot}'Tnp Repjpjrt, Upper Columbia River/Lake Roosevelt Expanded
Site Inspection. Decembe®2001.
10 START-2\01020028\S772
9-3
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PETITION
-------
THE OOfVI FEDERATED TRIBES
oF
THIE COLVBLLE RESERVWTIOfVJ
POST OFFICf BOX I 50-NESP€L£M WASHINGTON 991 J5 PHONE (509) 654-471 I
August 2, 1999
Regional Administrator
Region X
United States Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Re: Petition for Assessment of Release
Dear Mr. Clark:
I write in my capacity as the Chair of the Business Council of the Confederated
Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, a sovereign entity whose government is
recognized by the United States. This letter is also sent to you in furtherance of the
October 1996 Environmental Agreement between EPA and the Tribes.
Enclosed herein a Petition of the Tribes for a Preliminary Assessment of the
hazards to public health and the environment which are associated with the release or
threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant on lands which
include the Reservation.
As is set out in detail in the enclosed Petition, the upper Columbia River basin has
been of great importance to the Colville Tribes since time immemorial. We have always
occupied and utilized this area, from below the Columbia-Okanogan confluence up into
what is now Canada, and the fish, wildlife, and plant materials of the upper Columbia
basin have always been of central importance to the Tribes' subsistence and culture The
Confederated Tnhes of the CoKille Indian Kcservjlion
C CAWS-1 ^TD/4% GO 1"01"053 00002
1093742
-------
Regional Administrator
Region X
United States Environmental Protection Agency
July 30, 1999
Page 2
Tribe continues to hold reserved hunting and fishing rights in lands in the North half of
the historic reservation lands, including the Columbia River, which are recognized in
Section I of the October 1996 Environmental Agreement between the Tribes and EPA.
This matter is extraordinarily important to the Tribe. We respectfully request th;
you give this matter your full and careful attention.
Very truly yours,
CONFEDERATED TRIBES
COLVILLE INDIAN RESERV
.olleenXDawstdn
Chair, Colville Business Council
cc: Members, Colville Business Council
Director, Office of Environmental Trust
Director, Office of the Reservation Attorney
Special Environmental Counsel
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation
C CAWS-1 WPD/4% GO l'/017053 00002
-------
' • LAW OFFICES
SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS PLLC
,AUtR. CREWMAN. JR.. P.S. 999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3000 CLAUDIA CRAWKJRO
IOHM O- OUROESS WM.TCK H OLSCM IfL
.WAN L. COMSTOCK SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98 104-4088 JOHN a SULUVAN
JOHN H. STRASBURCER PAUL CHUET
JAMES A. OLIVER FAX: (206) 340-8856 CONNIE SUE MANOS MARTIN
DAVID «. KOOFMANS CRAEHM C. WALLACE
KENNETH L. MYER (ZU6J 68Z-3333 lENNtFER DIKE
ROBERT |. SHAW ANNE-MARIE E. SARGENT
RICHARD A. PU bET DEREK N. KO
PAUL R, CREJSMAN. JR. t BRENT WALTON
ANDREW W UARON N. EUZA8ETM McCAW..
CHRISTOPHER J. SOELUNG DAVID A. HEUUIAN
PAUL]. nATTON ZACHART A. WIUCHT
BMAMT.OOUXXIO JUUE L. WltCHINS
ROBERT E. HIBBS
CHRISTOPHER R OSBORN 0 u
MICHAEL R. GARNER KENNETH P. SHORT
DAVID E. BRESK1N DOUGLAS R. HABTWICH
SCOTT A. SMITH ROBERT E. HEATON
STEPHEN P. CONNOR SAMUEL S. CHUNG
SUSAN THORBROGGER UARK S. KADLER
SCOTT M. MISSALL ROBERT A. STEWART
LUAWOUARD OfcOUHSO.
KERRY S.BOCKUN*
AugUStS, 1999 JOSEF DUXOND
eo»«
•• Aouirrto IN CCOWIA
Regional Administrator
Region X
. United States Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Re: Petition for Assessment of Release
Dear Mr. Clark:
We represent the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (Tribes).
This Petition is submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on behalf
of tiis Tribes, a sovereign entity whose government is recognized by the United States,
and, through the Tribes' Office of Environmental Trust The Tribal government, and the
role of Environmental Trust, has been specifically recognized in the October 1996
Environmental Agreement between the Tribes and EPA. This Petition is submitted to
EPA in furtherance of the Tribal/EPA Agreement The Office of Environmental Trust is
located at Post Office Box 150, Nespelem, WA 99155, and the telephone number is (509)
634-4711.
1. Petitioner/Location
Pursuant to Section 105(d) of CERCLA, 42 USC §9605(d), the Tribes, Efititioner
Confederated Tnbcs of the Colville Indian Reservation
Response Petition to EPA - Page 1
226384 2/4%_GOI!/OI7053 00002
-------
herein, respectfully request that EPA Region X conduct a Preliminary Assessment of the
hazards to public health and the environment which are associated with such release or
threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant at the following
location:
The Upper Columbia River Basin from the Canadian Border,
southward through Lake Roosevelt, to the Grand Coulee
Dam, encompassing the water, river- and lake-beds, and
banks1
2. Petitioner is affected by the release
Critical tribal resources, governance processes, and inter-governmental agreements
have been and continue to be affected by these releases. As repeatedly confirmed by
decisions of the federal courts, the upper Columbia River basin has been of great
importance to the Colville Tribes since time immemorial. Predecessors of the Colville
Tribes and its members have always occupied and utilized this area, from below the
Columbia-Okanogan confluence up into what is now Canada. The fish, wildlife, and
plant materials of the upper Columbia basin have always been of central importance to
the Colville Tribes' subsistence and culture. When the Colville Reservation was
established in 1872, the entire segment of the Columbia from the Okanogan confluence to
the Canadian border, roughly 150 river miles, was included within the Reservation. In
1891, the Colville Tribes ceded the North Half of the Reservation to the United States,
including a portion of the Columbia, but expressly reserved hunting and fishing rights in
these ceded lands, including the Columbia River. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed these
rights in a 1975 decision, Antoine v. Washington^ 420 U.S. 194, and Section I of the
October 1996 Environmental Agreement between the Colville Tribes and EPA also
recognizes these rights.
Grand Coulee and Chief Joseph Dams have eliminated anadromous fish from most
of the Columbia within the Colville Reservation and former North Half, but the Tribes
continues to rely heavily on the anadromous fisheries between Chief Joseph Dam and the
Reservation boundary five miles downstream. In addition, the Tribes has come to rely
increasingly on the resident fishery and water resources above the dams, both for
subsistence and recreation and for economic development in the form of tourist and
recreation enterprises.
See Figure I - Lake Roosevelt and tributary waters attached as Exhibit A
Confederated Tnbcs of the Colville Indian Reservation
Response Petition to EPA - Page 2
226384 2/4% GO I '/017053 00002
-------
Active Tribal environmental and fishery management programs, in coordination
with other management entities on the system, struggle to maintain a viable, healthy
ecosystem given the past environmental damages and current management constraints. It
is also important to note that there is increasing recreational use of the Lake Roosevelt
system along with increased population growth. The Tribes have established a marina,
houseboat rental enterprise and related business in a continuing effort to create jobs and
improve the quality of life for Tribal members and the broader community. Therefore,
issues about contaminants in the system that raise serious human health questions are
critically important to Petitioner and all members of the local population.
3. Characteristics of the substances released
Based upon information and belief, Petitioner asserts that the following hazardous
substances have impacted the study area and should be included in the Assessment
process:
3.1 metals (arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc); primary
source of the contamination appears to be a lead-zinc smelter on the Columbia River in
British Columbia but may also come from the Spokane-River2
3.2 blast furnace slag from Canadian smelters as well as from the LeRoi
(Northport) Smelter site in Northport, Washington3
3.3 organochlorine compounds (dioxins, fiirans, and PCBs) believed to
have originated from a pulp mill near Castlegar, British Columbia4
3~4 wood-pulp waste, urban runoff, and discharges from industrial
activities5
3.5 contaminants released into the Upper Columbia from historic and
2 See Exhibit A at 12.
3 Id at 12 and 14.
4 Id at 13
See Exhibit A generally
Confederated Tnbes of the Colvillc Indian Reservation
Response Petition to EPA - Page 3
22638-4 2/4% GOl'/017053 00002
-------
ongoing mining operations in the region6
3.6 contaminated fugitive dust caused by exposed sediments resulting
from drawdowns of Lake Roosevelt
4. Activities contributing to the releases.
4.1 In the early 1980s, concerns about water quality in Lake Roosevelt
and the upper Columbia River were first reported in a U.S. Fish and Wildlife study that
reported elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc in fish. Follow up
studies identified the primary source of the contamination to be a lead-zinc smelter on the
Columbia River in British Columbia, 16 km upstream from the international boundary.
Since the 1950s, the subject smelter had discharged several hundred tons of blast furnace
slag and effluent per day into the Columbia River.
4.2 At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council (LRWQC), the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) initiated a large-scale sediment quality study in 1992. The USGS reported that
bed sediments were contaminated, as indicated by elevated concentrations of metals
(arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc), laboratory toxicity, and altered
benthic invertebrate communities. In addition, a 1994 USGS study determined that
mercury in sportfish was elevated to levels high enough to trigger a Washington
Department of Health consumption advisory.
4.3 Due in part to the studies in Canada and Washington state, the
subject lead/zinc smelter in Canada has apparently stopped discharging slag and has
reduced its effluent discharge. While this is a significant improvement in the loadings of
metals Jo the system, large quantities of contaminated sediments remain in Lake
Roosevelt, and therefore studies are still in progress. For example, Petitioner is currently
funding a USGS study to determine if the level of mercury found in the tissue of Walleye
Pike has decreased since the 1994 study. In addition, the EPA is presently funding a
USGS study in the Coeur d'Alene and Spokane River Basins as part of a Natural
Resources Damage Assessment (NRDA) of the Coeur d'Alene system. The primary
objective of that study is to determine the relative contribution of metals to the Spokane
River from the Lake Coeur d'Alene system.
Id and sec Exhibit B
Confederated Tnbcs of the CoKillc Indian Reservation
Response Petition to EPA - Page 4
226384 2/4% O01 '/017053 00002
-------
4.4 While metals have received the most attention, organochlorine
compounds, due to their persistence and established role in causing adverse
environmental effects are also of concern. Human health effects of organochlorine
compounds are controversial. The particular organochlorine of concern are dioxins,
fiirans, and PCBs. In 1988 and 1990, Canadian studies reported large concentrations of
furans in fish collected in the Columbia River downstream of a pulp mill near Castlegar,
British Columbia. The Washington state Department of Ecology (Ecology) confirmed
that fish from Lake Roosevelt contained elevated furan concentrations, but that
concentrations of dioxins and furans generally decreased as one moves downstream away
from Canada.
4.5 In a 1992 study, the USGS reported that dioxins and furans were
present in suspended sediment collected from the Columbia River, but only a few of the
17 targeted isomers were detected. The form of dioxins most toxic to some laboratory
animals was not detected. Aside from dioxins and furans, few of the many other organic
compounds associated with wood-pulp waste, urban runoff, and industrial activities were
detected in the bed sediments of Lake Roosevelt and its major tributaries.
4.6 There is generally less known about PCBs than about the dioxin and
furan compounds. In 1993-94, Ecology reported that PCBs were detected in most fish
samples from the Spokane River, and that concentration were highest in fish collected
from the Spokane River above Spokane, but below the Idaho border. New data
developed by EPA and other agencies indicates that heavy metals may also present risks
to Lake Roosevelt and that further study of the risk of adverse impact to human health is
needed. In general, there needs to be more study regarding how contamination sources
located on the Spokane Indian Reservation may have impacted the Colville Reservation.
In 1994, the EPA funded a study to determine the potential human health risks posed by
concentrations of dioxins, furans, and PCBs in species offish collected and consumed by
people throughout Lake Roosevelt That study did find that dioxins and furans were
present in fish, but that concentrations did not differ from the upper Columbia River to
the Grand Coulee Dam. There has been no human health statements released from the
EPA PCB study.
4.7 In a current follow-up study, the USGS is presently determining if
organochlorine compounds, including both dioxins and fiirans, and PCBs, have decreased
in sportfish filets since the EPA study four years ago. This study was requested by the
Lake Roosevelt Water Quality Council and Colville Confederated Tribes; the Spokane
Tribe collected the fish as part of a joint (Colville Tribes, Spokane Tribe, Washington
Confederated Tnbcs of the Colville Indian Reservation
Response I'clilion lo LI'A - Page 5
226384 2/4% GO! >/01 7053 00002
-------
Department of Fish and Wildlife) fisheries monitoring program in Lake Roosevelt.
4.8 The EPA performed a site inspection of the LeRoi Smelter site in
1993. The SI sampled only on-site surface soils, surface soils of an adjacent city park,
and off-site (background) surface soils (a total of only 4 sampling sites) to gather data 40
evaluate potential soil problems associated with previous smelting operations on site.
The sampling revealed that arsenic, antimony, lead and copper were detected on site at
significant concentrations (exceeding Washington State Model Toxics Control Act
Method B soil cleanup levels). Arsenic and copper were also detected at a significant
level off site in the adjacent city park. No sampling of groundwater was conducted, nor
was the site assessed with regard to the suspected release or threatened release of a
hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant on site or from the site into the Columbia
River or to groundwater. The report recommended further investigation of the site to
evaluate any possible exposure via the air or soil pathway, but no additional investigation
has occurred to date.
5. Governmental officials contacted about the releases
5.1 The Tribe has contacted: Chuck Rice and Elizabeth McKenna from ~"
the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Tony Grover, Carl Nuechterlein,
David Knight, Guy Gregory, Bill Fees, and Flora Goldstein from the Washington State
Department of Ecology; Tanya Barnett and Fritz Clarke from the Washington Office of
the Attorney General; Mark Munn and Cindi Barton of the United States Geological
Survey; Mary Verner Moore from the Spokane Tribe of Indians; and Congressman
George Nethercutt from the United States House of Representatives.
5.2 The response from the State of Washington has been that Ecology
recognizes that LeRoi is ranked as a No. 1 (most serious) on the State Hazardous
Substances List Ecology has conducted phase I of an assessment for remediation and
had intended to undertake phase n work involving well-drilling and a sediment study in
1999. However, phase II of the remediation plan never occurred because Ecology did not
have sufficient funds in its 1999 budget Furthermore, Ecology has not considered the
cumulative impact of the site in relation to the contribution by other sources to
contamination of the Columbia River basin and Lake Roosevelt.
Confederated Tnbcs of the Colvillc Indian Reservation
Response Pcuuon to EPA - Page 6
2263842/4% GO I I/O 17053 00002
-------
6. Request for Preliminary Assessment
In light of the foregoing, Petitioner herein, by and through the office of
Environmental Trust respectfully request that EPA Region X undertake timely review of
this matter and initiate the preliminary assessment of the releases described above. Please
be advised that the Tribes would like to meet with you to review this Petition and dis'cuss
how EPA and the Tribes may work together to protect the Upper Columbia River
environment.
fjkr
Respectfully submitted this fe? day of August, 1999 by:
SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS PLLC
Richard A. Du Bey
Special Environmental Counsel to the
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
RADrvh
cc: Members, Colville Business Council
Director, Office of Environmental Trust
Direccor, Water Quality Management
Director, Office of the Reservation Attorney
Elizabeth McKenna, EPA, ORC
Chuck Rice, EPA
- Richard McAllister, EPA, ORC
Tony Grover, Department of Ecology
Tanya Bamett, Office of the Attorney General
Guy Gregory, Department of Ecology
Cindi Barton, USGS
Mary Verner Moore, Spokane Tribe of Indians
Congressman George Nethercutt
Confederated Tribes of the CoIviHe Indian Reservation
Response Petition to EPA - Page 7
226384 2/4%_GOl'/0170S3 00002
-------
Celgar Pulp Mill <
!-\8"7
® Canadian Exptat.
Trail |
Cominco Q,
British Columbia
9 Reeves-McDonald
r
North Half
Colvflle Indian Reservation
Solville Indian Reservation
Grand Coulee Dam
Mjll/Mtne/IndmtrY Ke
4P Knob Hill MlW
0
3 ®
•
Coeur d* Alene Basin
Superfund Site
1mnco
IS© Celgar Pulp Mill
LeRoi Smelter
Figure 1 Lake Roosevelt and Tributary Rivers
-------
Lead (Pb)-Zinc (Zn) Mining/Milling Operations with Discharges into Lake Roosevelt & Upper Columbia
Josephine
Pend Oreille
Mines and
Metals Co.
Metalline Falls
1950
500 TPD
2400 TPD --
at new mill
across the
river (same
company)
500,000 gal. per day
20-25% solids by weight
0.37 %Zn, trace of Pb
Pend Oreille River
(via Flume Creek)
Grandview
Mill
American
Zinc, Lead
and Smelting
Co.
Metalline Falls
1950
700 TPD
490,000 gal. per day
discharged direct to river via
flume
0.3%Zn,0.1%Pb
Pend Oreille River
Reeves-
McDonald
Mine
Pend Oreille
Mines and
Metals Co.
Brit. Col., a
few miles
north of border
1950
700 TPD
1000 TPD
Discharged direct to river;
0.5 % Zn, trace of Pb
Pend Oreille River
Bonanza
Lead
Bonanza
Lead Co,
Palmers
1950
80 TPD
150 TPD
no direct discharge,
possibility of cyanide
leaching
Colville River
Gregor
Mines, Inc.
Bossburg
1949
100 TPD
direct discharge of overflow
Lake Roosevelt
Golfield
Consolidated
Mines Co.
above
Northport
1949
225 TPD
drainage
Columbia River
Last Chance
Consolidated
Mines, Inc.
below
Northport
1949
60 TPD
drainage
Columbia River
-------
Volume of Wastes Discharged to Pend Oreille River
by Lead-Zinc Mills in NE Washington and British Columbia
Name of Mill/Mine
Josephine (1941-1950)
Josephine II (195 1-1960)
Grandview (1941-1960)
Reeves-McDonald (1941-1960)
Discharge Volume (in gallons)
1.5 billion
3.6 billion
2.9 billion
3.6 billion
The combined total is 11.6 billion and would be enough to fill approximately
l,300Kingdomes.
209-451 l/4hm3/017053 00005
-2-
-------
1996-478
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the Natural Resources Committee to approve
the attached proposed agreement between the Colville Confederated Tribes and U. S. EPA, and
authorization that Chairman execute on behalf of the Tribes in connection with meeting with
EPA region x administration on October 29, 1996 in Seattle. Agreement may enable tribes to
qualify for additional funding in fY 97 (but does not guarantee any such funding). Agreement
also promotes government to government relationship between CCT and EPA. Agreement
recommended by Environmental Trust and Tribal Attorney.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that we, the Colville Business Council by authority
delegated in Resolution 1991-431, this 28th day of OCTOBER, 1996, do hereby approve the
recommendation of the Natural Resources Committee of the Business Council.
The foregoing was duly enacted by the Colville Business Council by a vote of 10 FOR
0 AGAINST, under authority contained in Article V, Section l(a) of the Constitution of the
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, ratified by the Colville Indians on February 26,
1938, and approved by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs on April 19, 1938.
ATTEST:
A
LS Joseph A. Pakootas, Chairman
Colville Business Council
cc: Deb Louie, Chairman, Natural Resources Com.
Gary Passmore, Environmental Trust
-Afe&Stay, .Tribal Attorney
Kathy Desautel, Financial Officer
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 10
AND THE
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION
L PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT AND ROLES
This Agreement reflects and affirms the government-to-government relationship between the
United States of America and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.
The Parties to this Tribal Environmental Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
11 Agreement") are the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (hereinafter referred to as
"Tribes"), represented by the Chairman of the Colville Business Council, and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), represented by the EPA Region 10 Regional Administrator.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was created to provide coordinated and effective
governmental action to assure the protection of the environment by abating and controlling pollution
on a systematic basis.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, is responsible for the execution of the Agency's
programs within the boundaries of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
The Parties recognize that the Colville Reservation established by Executive Order in 1872
is the permanent homeland of the Tribes and its members. The parties further recognize that the
Tribes retains significant rights in the so-called North Half of the Reservation, which was ceded to
the United States by an 1981 agreement reserving hunting and fishing rights for the Tribes and its
members. The parties also recognize that the Tribes and its members owns lands, some of which are
held in trust by the United States, outside the Reservation, both within the North Half and in other
locations near the Reservation.
The parties further recognize that the Tribes possesses inherent sovereign authority to regulate
environmental and natural resources matters within the Reservation, and that the Tribes desires to
establish the scope of its authority over lands within the Reservation not owned by the Tribes.
This Agreement identifies the respective roles and governmental responsibilities of the Tribe
and EPA for planning and undertaking environmental protection activities. The Tribe and EPA enter
into this Agreement in order to ensure that tribal jurisdiction is preserved and protected, and
furthermore, that the Tribe has substantial and meaningful involvement in environmental policy
decisions impacting its Reservation, tribal members and tribal resources.
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Coiville Reservation
Page 1
-------
The Parties expect that the improved coordination that will result from this Agreement will
maximize effective protection of the Tribe's environment and the fulfillment of the EPA's legislative
mandate and trust responsibilities to the Tribe.
In furtherance of the expectations of the Parties, the following declarations are made and
agreed to:
1. Pursuant to federal Indian law and policy, the Tribe is the government with primary
jurisdiction and stewardship for its members and resources, and the Tribe has the right to a substantial
and meaningful role in protecting the environment of its homeland.
2. The EPA is the federal agency with the primary responsibility for the protection of the
environment in and of the United States. The EPA has a trust responsibility to use its legal authority
to assist in the protection of the Tribal environment and the sovereignty of tribal government. The
EPA is committed to assisting the Tribe in its development and implementation of an environmental
protection and regulatory program which is consistent with EPA's regulatory authority.
IL VISION STATEMENT
A. Tribal Three Part Goal
The Tribes' strategic planning process is based on a 3-part holistic goal. Environmental
programs on the reservation pursue their mission in accordance with this 3-part goal*
1. Quality of Life:
We want to maintain and build upon our unique culture, traditions, language, sovereignty and
history, we want a healthy society, environment and economy; we will treat everyone with honor and
respect, having the freedom to worship, live, work and play as we choose, accepting each Others
diversity/uniqueness. We want to provide plentiful/affordable housing, meaningful/secure
employment and educational opportunities. We want communities that are clean, self-sufficient, safe,
wholesome and provide opportunities for family based recreation.
2. Forms of Production:
We will support our quality of life through sustainable wealth from diverse income
opportunities, without waste or sacrifice of tradition, culture and values; we will emphasize the
importance of involving the membership in developing their communities; we will provide
opportunities/infrastructure to increase understanding/awareness of our culture, traditions, language,
sovereignty and history throughout our communities, schools and workplaces, continuously
promoting honor, respect and diversity
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 2
-------
3. Future Resource Base:
We are and continue to be a self-sustaining sovereign entity, having flourishing enterprises, having
healthy productive landscapes including rangelands, croplands, forests, riparian areas, streams and
lakes, tribal decisions will include protection of tradition, culture, and aesthetic values; we will
continue to provide improved/enhanced opportunities to communities/schools/workplace to increase
understanding and awareness of our culture, values, tradition, language, sovereignty and history.
The reservation remains as a rural lifestyle and the population is in balance with an effective
water, mineral, and energy cycle with bio-diversity resulting in and abundance of culture, medicinal
and edible plants, clean air and water, springs and streams that flow year round, large trees, wildlife,
fish and insects.
B. EPA National Guidance
1- The EPA "Indian Policy"
The EPA Policy for the Administration of Environmental Programs on Indian Reservations
sets forth nine principles by which the EPA will pursue it's objective. Among the principles are a
commitment to work with tribes on a govemment-to-government basis, to recognize tribes as the
primary decision makers for environmental matters on reservation lands, to help tribes assume
program responsibility for reservations, to remove existing legal and procedural impediments to tribal
environmental programs, and to encourage tribal, state, and local government cooperation in areas
of mutual concern. The Policy has been reaffirmed by every administrator since it's adoption, most
recently by Administrator Carol Browner in 1994.
EPA's relationship with the Tribes is intended to be in accordance with its Indian and tribal
policies first set forth in 1983 which emphasize respect for tribal rights to self government and self
determination, a commitment to a co-equal government-to-government relationship, support and
advocacy in behalf of tribal jurisdiction, and a recognition of the unique trust responsibility of the
United States on behalf of Indian Tribes.
2. Government-to-Government Memorandum of 4/29/94.
President Clinton outlined principles intended to ensure that the federal government operates
within a govemment-to-government relationship with federally recognized tribes in a manner which
is "always respectful of tribal sovereignty."
3. Environmental Justice. Exec Order #12898. 2/11/94.
As a result of the Order, Administrator Browner convened an interagency Federal Working
Group and established the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, including tribal
government representatives
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 3
-------
4. Reinventing Environmental Regulations. 3/16/95
President Clinton and Vice-President Gore recognize as a principle of reinventing
environmental protection that federal, state, tribal and local government must work as partners to
achieve common environmental goals, with non-federal partners taking the lead when appropriate.
5. Congressional Recognition of Tribal Role.
Congress has amended the Safe Drinking Water Act, Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, Clean Air Act, and Clean Water Act to clarify the role
of tribal governments and enhance their ability to participate in the federal environmental regulatory
scheme.
6. EPA's Administrative Support of Congress' Intent.
Consistent with its Indian Policy, the EPA has pursued its goal to eliminate statutory and
regulatory barriers to the assumption of federal environmental programs by Indian tribes, including
the amendment of environmental laws to include tribes. EPA has utilized its administrative authority
under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act, and the Emergency Community Preparedness Right to know Act to include tribes as appropriate
authorities even where an Act has been silent on the role of tribal governments.
BO. OBJECTIVES
The Parties enter into this Agreement to accomplish the following objectives:
A. To Establish a Mechanism for Environmental Protection.
This Agreement is intended to establish a mechanism for determining the specific
environmental priorities for the Colville Confederated Tribes, to identify the regulatory areas under
the federal environmental laws for which the Tribes desire primacy, and to plan how all aspects of the
reservation environment can be protected.
This Agreement shall form the basis for communication and programmatic assistance to the
Tribe by the EPA, Program staff will provide assistance to the Tribe in accordance with the
govemment-to-government relationship between the Parties, and as specified by the Specific Work
plan attached to this Agreement.
8. To Implement the Govemment-to-Government Relationship.
This Agreement will provide a mechanism for implementing the government-to-government
relationship by clarifying the roles, responsibilities, and relationships of EPA and the Tribe
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 4
-------
C To Build Tribal Capacity
This Agreement is intended to build Tribal environmental capacity so that the Tribe will be
able to develop and implement an on-going environmental program. To the extent practical, given
resource limitations, the EPA will provide training and information-sharing workshops for Tribal staff
and Tribal government to build Tribal capacity and encourage the operation and management of
Tribal programs by Tribal people.
D. To Provide Support for Tribal Regulatory Processes
This Agreement will provide support for the development and implementation of regulatory
processes which will strengthen the ability of the Tribe to protect its cultural, religious and spiritual
resources as it protects its environment.
£. To Build Tribal Environmental Programs
This Agreement will facilitate support for Tribal development of an environmental program,
regulatory and otherwise, that will protect, conserve, and restore the reservation environment and the
health of its citizens. This Agreement will also provide a mechanism for the effective enforcement
of and compliance with federal and Tribal environmental laws.
F. To Institute Specific Procedures
This Agreement will provide a mechanism for the enhancement of communication, funding,
technical assistance, training, capacity building, administration and the periodic reevaluation of this
Agreement.
G. Ta Promote Stability
This Agreement shall be implemented to promote Tribal stability in funding, employment,
capacity building, infrastructure development and other factors that assure acceptable levels of
environmental protection on the reservation in perpetuity.
H. Long-Term Goals
This Agreement has been developed with the understanding that the long-term goal is to
address, implement and maintain, where deemed necessary by the Tribes, the full range of EPA's
activities and programs.
I. To Address the EPA Trust Responsibility
This Agreement will be used to identify procedures by which the EPA can uphold its federal
trust responsibility to the Tribes, to protect both the environment of the reservation and to protect
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
PageS
-------
other lands and rights which the Tribes retain. In addition, such procedures shall be the basis for
assistance by EPA in communicating trust responsibility concerns to other agencies whose activities
affect the rights and interests of the Colville Tribes
J. To Ensure that Unique Tribal Concerns are Respected
This Agreement is intended to provide a framework for environmental protection which is
respectful of Tribal cultural concerns, subsistence activities, traditional practices and resource
protection. This Agreement will assist EPA and Tribal staff in assessing and providing an
understanding of Tribal environmental needs and identify the areas under which the Tribe intends to
assume program responsibility.
K. Provide a Flexible, Common-Sense Tool for Tribal Environmental Protection
This Agreement is intended to provide maximum flexibility so that Tribal specific needs can
be accommodated. It should be interpreted as a flexible document that can be changed to meet Tribal
environmental needs.
EPA will in a timely manner notify the Tribes of all revisions in EPA policies and regulations
that may result in an impact to the Tribe will be communicated to the Tribe in a timely manner. The
Parties will work together to utilize the policies and regulations in a manner which will most
effectively facilitate the protection of the Tribe's environment in a manner consistent with the
govemment-to-government relationship. To that end, this Agreement will be revisited periodically
to keep it current with current legislation and regulations, expand flexibility into the future, and
review the progress in using the provisions of the Agreement to provide a flexible, common-sense
tool for Tribal environmental protection.
L. To Address a Full Range of Environmental Programs
This Agreement will provide the framework for the cooperative development, implementation,
and maintenance of comprehensive Tribal environmental programs. EPA and Tribal staff are
encouraged to identify all aspects of environmental protection that the Tribes may pursue to enhance
its capacity to protect the Tribes' environment.
M. EPA Planning
This Agreement will assist the EPA in identifying areas where EPA will need to plan for and
carry out direct implementation. This Agreement will provide a mechanism for including Tribal
concerns in EPA planning. The EPA Tribal Office will coordinate efforts to involve the Tribe in EPA
planning activities
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 6
-------
IV. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
As these Agreements are developed, all principles included in the EPA's Indian Policy shall
apply. These principles include recognition of the trust responsibility for environmental protection,
the government-to-govemment relationship, and Tribal sovereignty.
A. Protocol
The government-to-govemment relationship shall be directly between the EPA and the Tribes.
Grants, contracts, and official agreements between the two entities must be signed by Chairman of
the Colville Business Council, or otherwise approved in accordance with tribal law, to commit the
tribe to any official action or financial/performance requirement.
Training and technical assistance services for the Tribes by EPA will be initiated by initially
contacting the Director of Environmental Trust or a delegated individual.
EPA will coordinate with the Tribes when entering the Reservation for the purposes of
conducting enforcement activities and providing compliance and technical assistance. EPA will use
its best efforts to notify the Director of the Tribes' Environmental Trust Department of enforcement
inspections and investigations that take place on the Reservation. EPA will endeavor to afford tribal
environmental officials an opportunity to accompany EPA officials on visits to facilities for
inspections and investigations, and for compliance and technical assistance.
B. Communication
While implementing the Agreement, the EPA and the Tribe are committed to on-going, timely and
open communication. EPA commits to providing timely advice on available grants and other sources
of available funding, training and on-going meetings that affect Tribes. This also includes a timely
transfer of state of the art technology as the Tribe seeks to build capacity. The Tribe commits to
the identification of issues and problems at early stages of development in order to provide time to
plan potential resolutions that EPA may be able to support or implement (or assist in implementing)
in furtherance of this Agreement.
C. Environmental Justice
The principles of environmental justice shall apply to this Agreement. In general, these
principles call for the EPA to assure that Tribes at a minimum are afforded all of the opportunities
afforded States, including procedures for Tribal participation in EPA decision making. The unique
aspects of tribal sovereignty and the federal trust responsibility may require that the Tribes be entitled
to special opportunities as well. In addition, environmental justice principles call for a recognition of
Tribal cultural concerns such as subsistence needs and traditional uses of natural resources.
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page?
-------
V. TRIBAL AND EPA COORDINATION .
A. Information Sharing
The parties agree to share information relating to their activities or decision-making that may
directly or indirectly impact the environment of the Tribes. The Parties aJso agree that, to the extent
possible, they will share information pertaining to impacts on the Tribal environment or Tribal
resources.
B. Development of EPA Coordination Process
The Parties agree to maintain coordination efforts. Parties will communicate issues and
concerns regarding the work that is required to coordinate efforts to protect the environment of the
Tribes.
C. Planning
The Parties will use the partnership established herein to jointly plan and implement a strategy
for effective environmental programs on the Reservation that are consistent with the general Goals
and Objectives of the Agreement. Specific actions and time lines will be set forth in Appendix I to
this agreement entitled "Action Plan."
1. Planning and Budget Cycles
For the purposes of this Agreement the Tribe, in coordination with the EPA, will identify the
following:
a, EPA Resources Needed. The Parties will cooperatively identify resources needed
from EPA.
b. Grant Schedule Information. EPA will identify and submit to the Tribe a schedule
for submitting grant applications, and other such planning information.
c. Progress Toward Stable Funding. The Parties will seek to identify how stable
sources of funding will be provided, including resources from EPA and from the
Tribe. Project specific funding can be used to get started, but sources of long-term
program implementation funding sources should be identified.
d. Linkage Between Short- and Long-Term Funding. The Tribe will attempt to
explain in detail the linkage between long- terms goals and short-term resource needs
so that the EPA can pursue adequate resources to assist with these longer-term
objectives, without focusing on the year-to-year fluctuations to the budget.
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
PageS
-------
e. Updated Information for National Budget Development. Updated key information
for national budget development on rolling schedules should be submitted annually
based on the Agreement, while maintaining key activities that lead to fulfillment of
longer term goals.
2. Other Planning Considerations
To achieve a well-informed plan relating to community health and environmental quality, the
parties may consider infrastructure issues such as housing, utility and energy development, road-
building, transportation and community sanitation. Where both the State and EPA are engaged in
such infrastructure changes, the EPA agrees to initiate and/or facilitate discussion as to the potential
impacts the project will have on the Tribes, its members and residents, or its resources.
D. Visits by EPA Staff
To enhance coordination and the parties' working relationship, and to develop and implement
the Work Plan, EPA agrees to meet with representatives of the tribal government or tribal staff at
least once a year. The visits may focus on any or all of the objectives of this Agreement, including
collateral activities consistent and supportive of this Agreement.
£. Legislation
To the extent permitted by law and possible by timeliness, EPA agrees to solicit Tribal
comments on proposed legislation and regulatory activity which may impact the Tribe. The intent
is to provide the Tribe with an opportunity to comment on legislation that may impact it and its ability
to protect the Tribal environment.
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
A. Compliance Education
EPA will design an educational program and educational information to promote
environmental compliance on the Colville Indian Reservation, with respect to activities of the Tribes
and its entities and other persons and entities that affect the environment and may be subject to
federal or tribal environmental laws. The following will be addressed:
1. Tribal Participation and Comment
Invite Tribal participation and comment in the development of environmental legislation and
regulations affecting the Tribe.
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 9
-------
2. Existing Requirements
Inform the Tribe of existing environmental requirements, as stated in applicable laws and
regulations
3. Advice to Attain Compliance
Advise and explain to the Tribe how to effectively achieve compliance in non-compliance
situations.
4. Recognize Barriers to Compliance
Recognize when compliance may be delayed, and work ,to assure that public and
environmental health risks are minimized until compliance is achieved.
B. Technical Assistance in Developing Tribal Policies and Regulations
EPA will provide technical assistance and/or written models to the Tribe to assist in the
preparation and adoption of environmental policies and ordinances which are congruent with
applicable federal laws.
C. Assistance in Identifying and Prioritizing Compliance Problems
EPA and the Tribe will work jointly to identify and prioritize non-compliance situations in the
Colville Indian Reservatioa An inventory of noncompliance issues will be developed each year after
input from the Parties. Together, the Parties will decide upon strategies for correction, and include
the correction strategy in the environmental Action Plan for the applicable area, along with a time
line. EPA will coordinate with the Tribes if a federal enforcement response is planned for a non-
compliance situation involving a private party. The Parties shall periodically re-evaluate the selected
strategy, and their progress.
VIL TRIBAL CAPACITY-BUILDING
EPA recognizes that in order to achieve the Tribes' three part holistic goal environmental
protection programs on the Colville Indian Reservation must in time be melded into a holistic,
integrated program that reflects the values of the Tribes and meets or exceeds federal standards;
recognizing that nature, unlike environmental laws and regulations, is not compartmentalized into
discrete and independent parts.
The Tnbes recognize that by embarking on this agreement process that they will be working
with EPA to pioneer unique ways of protecting the environment, ways that do not necessarily fit the
"state model" or discrete environmental media program model
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 10
-------
EPA agrees to assist the Tribe in building its capacity and capability to assume responsibilities
that are identified as priorities for the Tribal government through this Agreement. Until the Tribe is
capable of assuming full programs or programs requiring EPA approval, EPA will retain responsibility
for managing federal environmental programs in the Colville Indian Reservation.
A. Definition
This Agreement is intended to build Tribal environmental capacity so that the Tribe will be
able to develop and implement on-going environmental programs. Tribal Capacity Building is the
process of working through Tribal government to build tribally-controlled community programs
which meet the needs of Tribal members and achieve the Tribes' 3-part goal. Tribal Capacity Building
promotes Self-Determination by encouraging the development, implementation and operation of
Tribal programs by the Tribes' government. Tribal Capacity Building will reduce reliance on federal
program implementation and oversight. Under this Agreement, Tribal Capacity Building includes the
development of environmental management capability. Management capability is composed of three
primary components: technical/managerial, education/communication, and environmental monitoring.
B. Guiding Principles for Capacity Building
1. Technical and Fiscal Resource Commitment
EPA will support the Tribes' Tribal Capacity Building through the dedication of EPA human
and fiscal resources (to the extent such resources are available or can be allocated), and through the
adoption of policies and regulations which support Tribal Capacity Building. EPA will work with
the Tribe and other federal agencies to identify long-term financial support for the implementation
of Tribal environmental programs.
2. Cross-Cultural Training
EPA will support and implement cross-cultural training for its staf£ to facilitate understanding
tribal culture, goals, and values. The Tribes agrees to provide information and, to the extent feasible,
technical assistance which will help EPA staff understand the unique history, circumstances and
perspectives of the Tribe. This training is intended to enhance communication and cooperation
between the Tribe and EPA staff and management. EPA will also develop a training module will
which assist the Tribal government and staff in understanding the institutional culture of the EPA.
3. Management Training
Subject to available resources, EPA will develop and implement an administration and
management training module which will assist Tribes in understanding the expectations and
requirements of EPA for such purposes as grant development and application, financial management
systems, grants compliance and reporting, program authorization requirements and other areas
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 11
-------
necessary to Tribal capacity building and success.
4. Commitment to Notification of Regulation Changes
EPA will provide the Tribe with proposed and final rules or regulations, as well as other documents,
which pertain to Tribal environmental programs, or which are requested by the Tribes. EPA will
assist the Tribes in conducting impact assessments of new or revised regulations, and in reviewing
potential funding and assistance resources made available by EPA.
Vffl. ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Setting Priorities
On an annual basis, the Tribe will identify specific environmental priorities for the Reservation.
The Parties will be guided by the following procedures.
1. Tribal Environmental Information Gathering
With technical assistance from EPA, the Tribes will gather information about Tribal
environmental concerns. A focus of the information gathering will be to distinguish between
environmental concerns being effectively addressed and those that need further emphasis in order to
minimize current and/or future risks.
2. Tribal Assessment of Priorities
Based on the annual environmental review, the Tribe will determine which environmental
concerns call for emphasis. The Tribe may also identify Tribal priorities for programs which it would
like the EPA to implement on the Reservation.
3. Joint Review of Tribal Information and Priorities
The Tribe will communicate with EPA regarding the Tribe's identified priorities. The Parties
will jointly review the priorities and identify a program implementation strategy. Both short and long-
term action plans will be revisited or developed.
4. Plan for Attaining Priorities
As part of establishing priorities, the Parties will develop a plan for attaining each priority,
which may include goals, tasks, responsibilities, and timelines for each specific matter. In addition,
the Parties will jointly identify potential short-term and long-term funding sources.
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 12
-------
5. Progress Milestones
The priorities and the identified progress milestones will be evaluated annually by staffs of
EPA and the Tribes, and will be presented to managers of EPA and the Tribes at the annual review
of this Agreement.
B. Implementation
The Parties concur that this Agreement provides a framework for each Party to act
individually under its authorities, and in concert with the other Party, to meet the goals and objectives
identified above.
1. Roles and Responsibilities of EPA.
EPA will, within available resource constraints:
a. Implement the EPA National Indian Policy and the policies of EPA Region 10.
EPA will take other actions in accordance with formal EPA policy, guidance and
direction, with due consideration of the Tribes' views.
b. Protect the Tribal environment
EPA will protect the Tribal environment to the same degree as the non-Tribal
environment, including spiritual and cultural sites, by ensuring effective
implementation and enforcement of regulatory programs that meet or exceed
applicable tribal, state and federal standards.
c. Retain EPA Jurisdiction on the Reservation
EPA will retain jurisdiction on the reservation for those federal environmental
program components which are not either delegated to the Tribes or otherwise
implemented by the Tribes.
d. Provide the Tribe with proposed and final Regulations
EPA will provide the Tribes with proposed and final regulations and policies, as well
as other documents which are available to the general public, which pertain
specifically to tribal environmental programs, or which are otherwise requested by the
Tribes.
e. Provide Technical and Other Assistance to the Tribe
EPA will assist the Tribes in conducting: i) reservation environmental program needs
assessments, ii) an impact assessment of new or revised regulations; iii) a priority
assessment of existing and new program requirements, and iv) a review of potential
funding and technical assistance sources
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 13
-------
f. Cross-Cultural Training
EPA will provide cross-cultural and trust responsibility training opportunities for EPA
staff and managers, with the assistance of the Tribes on request.
1 g. Participation in Ecosystem/Watershed Protection
EPA will assist and coordinate with the Tribes in the development of an
ecosystem/watershed approach to environmental protection based on the Tribes' 3-
part goal.
h. EPA Administrative & Management Training
EPA will provide training to facilitate the Tribes' understanding of the various EPA
program administrative and management requirements.
2. Roles and Responsibilities of the Tribes.
The Tribes will, within available resource constraints:
a. Identify Tribal Priorities
The Tribes will identify the Tribe's specific environmental priorities.
b. Implement a Primacy Strategy
The Tribes will, to the extent reasonable for its circumstances, implement a strategy
to achieve primacy for certain regulatory programs. As part of that strategy, the
Tribes will work with EPA and other federal agencies to build the capacity of the
Tribes to enforce and assure compliance with all necessary federal and Tribal
environmental laws, regulations, and programs.
c. Assist EPA with Programs
The Tribes will assist in the implementation of those programs for which EPA retains
the lead, and cooperate with EPA's efforts to enforce and assure compliance with all
federal environmental regulations.
d. Identify Alternative Funding Options
The Tribes will explore and identify options for long-term funding, including an
analysis of program fees, excise taxes and fines as a source of program funding.
e. Identify Tribal EPA Contacts
The Tribes agrees to identify a Tribal government representative and/or Tribal staff
who will be responsible for receiving and distributing EPA notices, including requests
for comment.
f Train EPA About Tribal Management
The Tribes will provide EPA with training and/or other information to facilitate EPA's
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 14
-------
understanding of the Tribe's culture and its administrative/management requirements.
3. Other Federal Agencies, State, Regional and Local Governments.
a. Other Federal Agencies
The Parties will work with other Federal agencies to carry out their relevant
responsibilities, sharing and coordinating the collection of information that pertains
to the human and environmental health both in and near the Colville Indian
Reservation.
b. Develop Relationships with Other Entities
Efforts to implement environmental protection for ecosystems will guide the
development of working relationships and procedures with federal, state, regional,
county and local agencies.
c. Assist in Educating Local Governments
EPA may assist in the Tribes' environmental program initiatives by helping to educate
local governments about this Agreement, the joint planning of environmental
protection on the Reservation, jurisdiction issues, the trust responsibility, and other
aspects of EPA's government-to-government relationship with the Tribes.
d. Cooperative Agreements
Upon the Tribes' request, EPA will provide technical assistance in developing
environmental cooperative agreements with state, regional, and local governments.
4. Funding and Technical Assistance.
Recognizing each of the Parties' resource limitations, the Parties will prioritize the
environmental programs for which the Tribes seek financial assistance. EPA will endeavor, within
the constraints of its resources, to provide technical and/or funding assistance requested by the Tribes
for those priorities.
C. Communications
The Parties agree that communications will be conducted as follows:
1. Designated Key Contacts - Programmatic
EPA has designated ita Tribal Programs Coordinator (currently Larry Brockman) to serve as
the primary contact for the Tribe. The Coordinator is responsible for assisting the Tribe, as necessary,
in working with others throughout the Agency The Tribal staff is free to communicate with staff
persons at the EPA who are responsible for the relevant program or subject matter In that instance,
the EPA staff person is responsible for notifying the Tnbal Coordinator of the communication so that
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 15
-------
at least one person in the EPA has the "big picture" of all EPA-Tribes activities. Tribal staff and
management should also feel free to contact the Regional Tribal Program Manager regarding
programmatic concerns.
The Tribe has identified its Director of Environmental Trust (currently Gary Passmore) as
Tribal staff person who will serve as the primary contact for the EPA on programmatic issues and
concerns, including but not limited to program development and implementation, grants development,
grants management and for whatever other purposes the Parties agree to.
2. Designated Key Contacts - Policy
Tribal staff, management and government should feel free to contact the Regional Tribal
Policy Director regarding policy matters. The Tribal Policy Director will provide timely policy
information to the Tribe, either personally or through the Tribal Coordinator.
The Tribes will identify a tribal contact that the Regional Tribal Policy Director can call on
for input on Regional tribal policy matters. When policy decisions that may impact the Tribal
environment are being considered, the Tribal Policy Director will provide for meaningful Tribal
government input, whenever possible.
3. Designated Key Contacts - Leadership
The Chairman of the Colville Business Council always has the option of contacting the
Regional Administrator and/or Deputy Regional Administrator if a situation arises which warrants
their involvement.
D. Issue Resolution
Both Parties will strive to address matters informally, at the staff level. In the event that staff
are unable to resolve a dispute, the issue will be presented to immediate supervisors, who will attempt
to resolve the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved, the staffs will present the matter to progressively
higher levels of management until consensus is reached.
In the event consensus is not reached, the matter will be resolved by the Regional
Administrator of the EPA and the Chairman of the Colville Business Council.
Other dispute mechanisms required by statute or regulation may apply to grants or program-
specific issues
DC. EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement is intended solely to facilitate intergovernmental coordination between the
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 16
-------
parties, and grants no rights in third parties nor any right of judicial review. This Agreement is not
intended as an enforcement document, and the Tribes disclaimsNany responsibility to act as an
enforcement agency. The parties do not, by entering into this Agreement, waive any rights, powers,
immunities or remedies otherwise available.
X. DURATION. RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION
A. Effective Date of Agreement
This Agreement is effective upon the date of signature by both parties
B. Duration & Renewal
This Agreement is self-renewing and will remain in effect until terminated by mutual
agreement of the Parties; provided, however, that any Party to this agreement may withdraw from
this agreement by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party. Unless otherwise
specifically provided, termination of this agreement will not in any way affect program delegations,
funding agreements, or any other agreements between the Parties.
C. Modification & Amendment
. This Agreement may be modified in writing upon the request of either party. All
modifications must be mutually agreeable, in writing, and signed by the signatories or their duly
appointed representatives, each party will keep the other informed of proposed and enacted
modifications to relevant statutory or regulatory authority, forms, procedures, or priorities. The
parties will endeavor to negotiate and make modifications to this agreement where it appears
appropriate to do so in light of any such proposed or enacted modifications.
XL SOVEREIGNTY AND DISCLAIMER
The parties to this Agreement recognize and respect the sovereignty and legal status of one
another. The parties further recognize that each has and reserves all rights, powers, and remedies
now or hereafter existing at law or in equity, or by statute, treaty or otherwise. This Agreement does
not modify, diminish, or alter the rights and entitlement of the Parties. The Tribes'joinder to this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity by the Tribes. This Agreement does
not modify or supersede agreements with other entities or other agreements with EPA unless
expressly noted.
XH. SAVINGS CLAUSE
If any provisions or elements of the Agreement are held or decided by law to be invalid, all
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 17
-------
other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. If, in the interpretation of the
Agreement, the parties have differing interpretations, an effort win be made to interpret the agreement
in terms that are favorable to the protection of the Tribal environment.
A. Regulatory Legislation
If any provisions or elements of the Agreement are held legally or by regulatory legislation
to be invalid, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
B. Funding Legislation
If any provisions or elements of the Agreement are held or decided by funding legislation to
be invalid, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
C. State EPA Agreements
Nothing in this Agreement is intended to abrogate agreements EPA has with other entities.
Conversely, agreements between EPA and other entities shall not abrogate this Agreement. In the
event EPA has entered into conflicting agreements, EPA will be attempt to facilitate a resolution of
the differences. Any elements of this Agreement that are designated as invalid shall not abrogate any
provisions of the Agreement not in conflict with other EPA agreements.
FOR THE PARTIES
Joseph A. Pakootas, Chairman Date
Chuck Clarke Date
Regional Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10
Environmental Agreement
U.S. EPA, Region X
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Page 18
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
LAKE ROOSEVELT
COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
I. RECITALS
A. Whereas, the Bureau of Reclamation (hereinafter Reclamation)
in connection with its responsibility for the construction,
operation, and maintenance of the Columbia Basin Project has
withdrawn or acquired lands or the right to use lands and
may acquire additional land under the federal reclamation
laws, Act of June 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and acts amendatory
thereof or supplementary thereto, including the Act of March
10, 1973, 57 Stat. 14, and the Act of August 30, 1935, 49
Stat. 1028, 1039; and
B. Whereas the parties recognize (1) that some of the land
acquired, withdrawn or used by Reclamation is located within
the boundaries of the Colville Indian Reservation and the
Spokane Indian Reservation; (2) that those reservation
boundaries were not changed as a result of the acquisition
or use of land within either reservation for the Columbia
Basin Project; and, (3) that the Confederated Tribes of the
Colville Reservation and the Spokane Tribe retain certain
governmental authority and responsibility within the
exterior boundaries of their respective reservations; and
C. Whereas, Congress and the President have each recognized
certain sovereign and governmental powers of Indian tribes
within their respective reservations, and support the tribal
sovereignty of Indian tribes to exercise their full measure
of governmental authority within their respective
reservations; and
D. Whereas, on Lake Roosevelt, consistent with the express
policies of the United States, the Colville and Spokane
tribes have an interest in and certain regulatory authority
within their reservations over fish and wildlife harvest and
habitat protection, recreation, environmental protection,
protection and management of cultural, historical and
archaeological resources, and the development and
utilization of resources on reservation, including economic
development and management thereof; and
PAGE 1 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
E. Whereas, the parties agree that the recreational and other
natural resources of Lake Roosevelt and adjacent lands which
through sound coordinated planning, development, and
management of the Lake Roosevelt Management Area (LRMA),
offer unusual opportunities for recreation and other
activities for the people of the nation, and the members of
the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and
Spokane Indian Tribe; and
F. Whereas, lands acquired by Reclamation for Lake Roosevelt
within the Colville and Spokane reservations are available
for public recreation and other development; however, the
management and development of those lands may pose unique
and difficult problems because of the cultural, religious,
and competing social uses to which the tribes have committed
their reservations; and
G. Whereas, the parties recognize that development in areas of
Lake Roosevelt located off the Colville and Spokane
Reservations will affect and impact reservation lands and
resources, and because the lake area was the ancestral home
of the Colville and Spokane Indians, such development could
impact off-reservation archaeological, historical or
religious sites; likewise, reservation activity will affect
similar sites off the reservation within the LRMA; and
H. Whereas, there is an inter-relationship between the
development of recreational and other natural resources of
the LRMA; and
I. Whereas, the Coulee Dam National Recreation Area is an
existing unit of the National Park system and subject to all
NFS laws, regulations, policies and guidelines; and,
J. Whereas, the National Park Service has special skills and
experience in planning, developing, maintaining and managing
areas devoted-to recreational uses, and is authorized to
coordinate with other federal agencies in developing
recreational programs (16 U.S.c. §§ 17j-2(b), 4601-1); and
K. Whereas, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
and the Spokane Indian Tribe have significant interests in
the use and development of those lands within the LRMA,
particularly within their respective reservations, and have
demonstrated the willingness, capability and experience to
PAGE 2 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
manage those lands and resources within their reservations
for beneficial purposes including public recreational uses,
and the conservation of the resources; and
L. Whereas, the respective parties to this Agreement are in a
position to provide the services herein identified and, it
has been determined to be in the interest of the United
States Government to use such services, and the
participation of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation, and the Spokane Tribe as set out herein is
consistent with the Indian Self Determination Act of 1975,
P.L. 93-638, as amended; and
M. Whereas, it is recognized and understood among the parties
hereto, that nothing contained herein shall affect the
authority of any party to commit federal funds as provided
by law; and
N. Whereas, the protection, curation and ultimate disposition
of archeological and historical resources (hereafter
collectively resources) located within the LRMA is an
important responsibility under this Agreement; and in
several areas, investigation or preservation activities
have occurred in the past but conditions have since changed;
and the parties recognize it is important to learn more
, about these resources; and
O. Whereas, there exists a dispute on the extent of the Spokane
Indian Reservation on the Spokane River Arm of Lake
Roosevelt; and whereas, nothing in this Agreement shall be
interpreted to affect that issue; and
P. Whereas, the Secretary of the Interior has a trust duty to
tribes and has an obligation to exercise his/her authority
consistent with statutory responsibilities and that trust
duty, and to interact with tribes on a governraent-to-
government basis.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, hereby mutually agree as
follows:
II. AUTHORITY
1. This Agreement is entered into by the Department of the
Interior pursuant to the authority of the Act of August 30,
PAGE 3 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
1935, 49 Stat. 1028, 1039, the Act of March 10, 1943, 57
Stat. 14, 43 U.S.C. §§ 373, 485i (1982). Nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed to modify or annul the
Secretary's authority under these Acts.
2. The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation has
authority to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Article
V, Section 1, Part (a) of the Colville Constitution, adopted
February 26, 1938, and approved by the Secretary on April
19, 1938.
3. The Spokane Tribe has authority to enter into this Agreement
pursuant to Article VIII of the Spokane Tribal Constitution,
adopted June 27, 1951, as amended.
III. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to allow the parties to
coordinate the management of the Lake Roosevelt Management Area
(hereinafter referred to as LRMA), and to plan and develop
facilities and activities on Lake Roosevelt and its freeboard
lands. The parties acknowledge and recognize management of the
LRMA is subject to the right of the Bureau of Reclamation to
accomplish the purposes of the Columbia Basin Project.
IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Parties*
The parties to this Agreement shall include as governmental
parties the National Park Service (NPS), the Bureau of
Reclamation (Reclamation), the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA), the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
(Colville Tribes), and the Spokane Indian Tribe (Spokane
Tribe). Unless the context of the Agreement requires
otherwise, the Colville and Spokane tribes shall be referred
to collectively as "tribes."
B. Area Subject to Agreement;
This Agreement shall cover the management of the LRMA as
depicted in Exhibit 1 attached hereto. The LRMA includes
Grand Coulee Dam and its appurtenances on Lake Roosevelt,
the surface area of Lake Roosevelt up to elevation 1290 rasl
PAGE 4 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
(hereinafter Lake area) and all freeboard lands surrounding
Lake Roosevelt above elevation 1290 msl owned by or used by
the United states pursuant to any agreement for purposes of
the Columbia Basin Project.
C. Management Zones;
For the purpose of coordinating the management of the LRMA,
and for allocating the appropriate use of resources
available in and around Lake Roosevelt, three management
zones shall be established.
1. Reclamation Zone; That part of the LRMA surrounding
Grand Coulee Dam as set out in Exhibit 1 and marked in
blue.
2. Recreation Zone: That part of the LRMA lying outside
of the Reclamation and Reservation Zones as set out in
Exhibit 1 and marked in green.
3. Reservation Zone; That part of the LRMA lying within
the boundaries of the Colville Indian Reservation or
Spokane Indian Reservation all as set out in Exhibit 1
and marked in orange. Provided, that for purposes of
management only, in those areas where the Colville
Indian Reservation and Spokane Indian Reservation lie
across from each other and on the Spokane River arm,
there shall be a right of navigational passage. This
right shall be defined as the right to pass through
that portion of the Reservation Zone defined in this
Part to a destination point outside that portion of the
Reservation Zone.
D. Management and Regulation of the LRMA;
The parties to this Agreement agree that the management and
regulation of the LRMA set out below are not intended to nor
shall they interfere with or be inconsistent with the
purposes for which the Columbia Basin Project was
established, is operated and maintained; those purposes
being primarily flood control, improved navigation,
streamflow regulation, providing for storage and for the
delivery of stored waters thereof for the reclamation of
public and private lands and Indian reservations, for the
generation of electrical power and for other beneficial
uses, nor is it intended to modify or alter any obligations
PAGE 5 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
or authority of the parties. Consistent with the above
statement, the management and regulation of the LRMA shall
be as follows:
1. Reclamation shall have exclusive operational control of
the flow and utilization of water at the Grand Coulee
Dam and Project facilities operated by Reclamation, and
of all access to the Grand Coulee Dam and Project
facilities operated by Reclamation; and complete and
exclusive jurisdiction within the Reclamation Zone,
including authority over and responsibility for the
Grand Coulee Dam and Project facilities operated by
Reclamation, and such project lands adjacent thereto as
the Commissioner of Reclamation with the approval of
the Secretary determines to be necessary for Project
purposes. Provided. that the parties shall retain the
right to take any action otherwise available to s
challenge any action undertaken by Reclamation under
the authority recognized under this Part, including but
not limited to action dealing with irrigation, lake
level, flows, and storage.
2. NFS shall manage, plan and regulate all activities,
development, and uses that take place in the Recreation
Zone in accordance with applicable provisions of
federal law and subject to the statutory authorities of
Reclamation, and consistent with the provisions of this
Agreement subject to Reclamation's right to make use of
the Recreation Zone as required to carry out the
purposes of the Columbia Basin Project.
3. The tribes shall manage as follows:
a. The Colville Tribes shall manage, plan and
regulate all activities, development and uses that
take place within that portion of the Reservation
Zone within the Colville Reservation in accordance
with applicable provisions of federal and tribal
law, and subject to the statutory authorities of
Reclamation, and consistent with the provisions of
this Agreement subject to Reclamation's right to
make use of such areas of the Reservation Zone as
required to carry out the purposes of the Columbia
Basin Project.
PAGE 6 OF 15 — LAKE ROOS-EVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
b. The Spokane Tribe shall manage, plan and regulate
all activities, development, and uses that take
place within that portion of the Reservation Zone
within the Spokane Reservation in accordance with
applicable provisions of federal and tribal law,
and subject to the statutory authorities of
Reclamation, and consistent with the provisions of
this Agreement subject to Reclamation's right to
make use of such areas of the Reservation Zone as
required to carry out the purposes of the Columbia
Basin Project.
c. In those portions of the Reservation Zone where
the Colville Indian Reservation and Spokane
Reservation abut, the tribes shall determine as
between themselves the allocation of management
responsibility.
4. The BIA shall assist the tribes in carrying out the
tribes' management of the Reservation Zone, and
undertake such other activities as are authorized by
law in support of the tribes.
E. Coordination of LRMA.
1. Each party to this Agreement shall designate a
representative who will meet periodically with
representatives of the other parties to coordinate the
independent management of each within the LRMA,
consistent with this Agreement.
2. The Parties shall:
a. Review, coordinate, communicate and standardize
the management plans, regulations and policies
developed by the tribes and NPS for their
respective management areas to manage and regulate
(1) recreation activities, (2) commercial and
private development, including major new or
significantly expanded development, and (3) the
protection of the environment of the LRMA, all
consistent with the special interests identified
by the parties for their respective management
areas, to the extent possible.
PAGE 7 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
b. Develop a method to incorporate the plans
developed by the tribes and NFS to provide to the
extent practicable uniform management in the LRMA.
Implementation of such plans shall be carried out
consistent with the purposes of the Columbia Basin
Project.
c. Review, coordinate, communicate and standardize
use permits within the LRMA to the extent
practicable, taking into account the cultural and
religious interests of the tribes and other
parties, and the need to have the standards
uniformly applicable in the LRMA.
d. Monitor, once per year, compliance with this
Agreement.
e. Involve and receive the comments from other
interested state, local, county or regional
governmental entities and private individuals, or
citizen groups or entities with respect to
activities related to the management of the LRMA.
f. Coordinate the development of annual operating
budgets and proposals for funding.
g. Undertake such other Lake Roosevelt activities
that the Parties agree to undertake consistent
with applicable law.
3. Dispute Resolution Process;
a. Any party to this Agreement that is aggrieved by
any action of another party related to this
Agreement, or the failure of a party to act
consistent with this Agreement may request that
the issue be resolved under this part.
b. Any party shall prior to initiating any procedure
under Part c of this Part, request: (1) a meeting
of all Area/Regional Directors and tribal council
representatives, to see if the problem can be
resolved, and (2) if the process under Part (1) of
this subpart is not successful any party may
request that officials of the next higher level of
BIA, -NPS and Reclamation and area/regional
PAGE 8 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
Directors meet with tribal council representatives
to consider the issue and attempt to resolve it.
c. The aggrieved party or parties may request that a
mediator be appointed to help resolve the issue.
The parties shall agree on a mediator, or in the
absence of agreement, the presiding Judge of the
United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Washington shall be requested to
appoint a mediator. The parties shall develop
procedures to insure that mediation is
expeditious.
d. The dispute resolution process set out in this
part shall be in addition to any other rights of a
party to seek enforcement or interpretation of
this Agreement.
F. Funding:
1. All parties shall cooperate in the development of all
budget components and cost data and in the sharing of
the necessary technical information so that each party
can make realistic budget estimates necessary for that
party to adequately manage the LRMA.
2. Each party to the Agreement shall seek funding for its
share of this Agreement. The Superintendent of the
Coulee Dam National Recreation Area, the Project
Manager of Grand Coulee Dam and the Colville and
Spokane Agency Superintendents of the Bureau of Indian
Affairs will make a good faith effort to request funds
needed by them to manage the LRMA. The BIA agency
superintendents shall request funds needed by the
tribes to adequately carry out their management
responsibilities as identified under this Agreement.
These requests shall only be developed and proposed
consistent with and subject to budgetary practices and
procedures of the United States, including, but not
limited to the direction and policies of the President,
OMB, and the Secretary of the Interior. Except as
required under this paragraph or applicable law,
parties to this Agreement shall support the need to
provide adequate funding to the tribes to allow the
tribes to carry out their responsibilities under this
Agreement.
PAGE 9 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
3. Upon approval of the requests for submission to the
Congress as part of the President's budget, each party
shall to the extent practicable, identify these funds
in their respective congressional justifications and
continue to support their own and each other's funding
requests when testifying before Congress to the extent
that such requirements are identified in the
President's budget.
4. This Agreement shall not create an obligation on the
part of any party hereto to expend funds that have not
been lawfully appropriated by Congress or the Colville
or Spokane tribes. The failure to take action
otherwise required because funds were not appropriated
shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement.
5. Nothing in this part shall prohibit or limit the right
of the tribes to independently seek funding from
whatever source is available to carry out their
management and regulation within the Reservation Zone.
6. To the extent allowed by law, and consistent with the
activity being undertaken and the terms of the
Agreement, if additional funds from sources other than
congressional appropriation become available to
Reclamation, NFS or the BIA for purposes of undertaking
any activity addressed by this Agreement, the agencies
shall attempt to assure an equitable portion of those
funds will be available to the tribes for compliance
with this Agreement.
7. When the BIA submits its proposed budget it shall
specifically identify for the Colville and Spokane
tribes funds to cover the Lake Roosevelt Management
Agreement.
8. Funding for the curation of any Indian resources
transferred to the Colville and Spokane tribes will be
included in the tribes' budget for management of LRMA
unless other means become available for curation.
G. Coordination of Recreation;
1. The NFS and tribes shall coordinate their respective
activities to the end that in the implementation of
PAGE 10 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
their independent management and regulation of the LRMA
they achieve to the extent practicable, a uniform
system of recreation management including law
enforcement throughout the LRMA taking into account the
special needs or circumstances identified by the tribes
or the NFS within the Reservation or Recreation Zones,
respectively.
2. The NFS and tribes shall develop and implement a
procedure that informs the recreating public of all
facilities, resources, and concessions located within
the LRMA, and the limitations on their use, and further
informs the recreating public of the rules applicable
in the various Management Areas of the LRMA, including
anti-pollution rules.
3. The NFS and tribes shall work with Reclamation in the
development of any recreation management or resource
plans for the LRMA consistent with Federal law.
H. Development and Utilization of Resources:
1. The tribes shall retain within those parts of the
Reservation Zone within their respective reservations
the right to beneficially develop and utilize, the
natural resources and to develop economic enterprises
that are compatible within the character of the LRMA,
subject to federal statutory requirements. Use of the
freeboard lands as allowed under this subpart H.I.
shall be with the permission of the United States,
which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
2. Should operations of the Columbia Basin Project cause
damage to the natural resources on the freeboard lands
within the Reservation Zone for which mitigation is
required by law, the mitigation shall take place on the
Reservation within which the damage took place to the
extent practicable. Nothing in this part shall relieve
any party from liability for past impacts to the
natural resources of any party on either the Colville
or Spokane Reservations.
I. Reservation of Rights;
This Agreement shall not be construed as waiving any rights
the parties have under any applicable Act of Congress,
PAGE 11 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
Executive Order, treaty, regulation, court decision or other
authority.
J. Protection and Retention of Historical. Cultural and
Archaeological Resources;
1. The parties to this Agreement shall prepare a Cultural
Resources Management Plan that provides for the
identification, and protection of Indian archaeological
and historical resources (as identified in 16 U.S.C.
470bb(l), and 16 U.S.C. § 470w(5) (hereafter Indian
Resources) located within the LRMA, and a procedure for
the most expeditious transfer of title and return to
the tribes of Indian Resources removed from the LRMA by
the United States or with the United States' authority
and which are within the United States' possession or
under its control, consistent with the tribes' ability
to properly curate or provide for the curation of the
Indian Resources as required by law.
2. The Cultural Resources Plan shall contain provisions
requiring the Federal parties to notify and consult
with the tribes during the planning process and prior
to authorizing or undertaking any survey, monitoring,
or removal of Indian Resources from the LRMA, and shall
provide an opportunity for the tribes to participate
in, or if consistent with the activity to undertake any
such activity.
K. Duty to-Comply;
It shall be a violation of this Agreement for any party to
take any action or authorize any other person or entity to
take any action that is inconsistent with or in violation of
the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or to fail to
take any action otherwise required by this Agreement.
V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Effective Date;
This Agreement shall become effective on the date it is
approved by the Secretary of the Interior.
PAGE 12 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
B. Modification of Agreement;
This Agreement may be modified only in writing, signed by
all the parties and approved by the Secretary.
C. Termination;
This Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by
the Secretary of the Interior. Any party may request that
the Secretary terminate this Agreement. Within 30 days of
the receipt of a request to terminate, the Secretary shall
establish a mechanism to assist the parties to the Agreement
in reconciling differences under this Agreement or to
negotiate a new Agreement. The Secretary shall terminate
this Agreement 180 days after the mechanism required under
this part is established if no agreement between the parties
is reached.
D. Judicial Enforcement:
Without regard to any other dispute resolution process set
out in this Agreement, any party may seek review of any
provision of this Agreement to determine the rights or
obligations of the parties under this Agreement or to seek
judicial enforcement of any provision of this Agreement or
of a party's failure to carry out any duty provided for
under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
interpreted or construed as a limitation upon any party's
right to seek judicial or administrative enforcement or
review of any matter based upon treaty, Federal or state law
or Executive Order, or to take any other action allowed by
law.
E. Implementation of Agreement:
1. The tribes and the NFS shall independently exercise
their individual and separate management and regulation
of the Reservation and Recreation Zones respectively,
consistent with the consultation and coordination
responsibilities set out in this Agreement, and
consistent with the legislated purposes of the Columbia
Basin Project and applicable Reclamation Law.
2. Reclamation, in exercising its statutory oversight
authority in the LRMA, shall not interfere with the
management and regulation of the tribes or NFS as set
PAGE 13 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
out in Part IV.D of this Agreement except where the
actions of either the tribes, the NFS, or both are
inconsistent with the legislated purposes of the
Columbia Basin Project or interfere with the ability of
Reclamation to carry out its legislated responsibility
for the Columbia Basin Project.
F. Visitor Center;
Reclamation shall work with the tribes and NPS to
incorporate their suggestions into the development of an
interpretive program to the extent of available resources,
for changes to the visitor's presentations. The resulting
program should depict the purpose and operation of the
Columbia Basin Project, the Indian history, government, and
culture of the area, the impact of the Columbia Basin
Project on the tribes, and the available recreational
resources and benefits. This may include the display and
distribution of literature/information applicable to the
LRJMA.
G. Contracting:
There are or may be activities carried out by contract by
the Federal parties that take place within the LRMA under
this Agreement that could be contracted by the tribes. The
Federal parties will provide notice to the tribes of all
contracting opportunities within the LRMA and will
coordinate on contracting options, which may be available to
tribes, either directly or through another Federal agency,
within the LRMA, prior to the obligation of appropriated
funds consistent with their statutory authorities. The
parties to this Agreement shall use their best efforts to
contract with the tribes consistent with the continued
execution of their agency directed duties, to the extent
allowed by statutory authority. Likewise, there may be
opportunities for the tribes to contract for services or
PAGE 14 OF 15 — LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
APPROVED:
DATED:
APR 2 0 1999
/a'
^c
e C. St^nsgar ^
chairperson
Colville Business Council
13SC
DATED:
APR 2 0 1990
John M. Sayre/
Assistant Secretary'for
Water and Science
DATED: APR 1 1 1990
. Flett
jCha/Lrperson
Indian Tribe
APR 1 0 19SO
DATED:
e M. Ridenour
(director
National Park Service
Constance Harriman
Assistant Secretary for
Fish, Wildlife and Parks
APR 2 0 1890
DATED:
Dennis jln^erwooa
Commissioner
Bureau of Reclamation
DATED:
idie F
A'ssistant Secretary for the
Bureau of Indian Affairs
DATED:
APR 0 5 1990
Ma/fuel LUjan, sTr.,
Department of Interioi
.GE 15 OF 15 ~ LAKE ROOSEVELT COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------
Cooperative Agreement Zonning Map
Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area
Department of the Interior / National Park Service
DSC / 606 /August ]998/20,039
DETAIL RECLAMATION ZOW
OK.\NOCAN
COtviLLC
FERRY
_J.L
. '.J.\ RICL/JMATION ZONg
RECREATION ZONE
RESERVATION ZONE
STEVENS
SPOKANE INDIAN RESERVATION
GRAND COULEE
DAM
I
C1C 5ie U 5 PR
22J-,ir-l
for Rtclomolion
LINCOLN
NOTE' RecliaJ '0'
In lha agreement
-------
APPENDIX C
SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN SEDIMENT AND SURFACE WATER
SAMPLES
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date.
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS001
CR-003-SD
05/14/2001
0 in to 3 In
CS002
CR-001-SD
05/14/2001
0 in to N/A
CS003
CR-004-SD
05/15/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS004
CR-005-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS005
CR-006-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS006
CR-007-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
-
Pesticides/PC Bs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
42U
42U
22U
22U
42U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
41U
4 1 U
21U
21U
41U
41U
21 U
11 JQ
59JQ
45U
45U
2.3 U
23U
45U
45U
23 U
45 U
45 U
54U
54U
28U
28U
54U
54U
28 U
54U
54U
54U
54U
28U
28U
54U
54U
28 U
54 U
54 U
39U
39U
20U
2 OU
39U
39U
20 U
39 U
39 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
11300
1 3BJL
67
136
066B
0.08 U
7150
16.4
8.4 B
173JL
22900
6270
0.74 UJK
4.5 U
796
045B
0.62 B
3090
77
5.2 B
98JL
16700
8730
0.81 BJL
4.0 U
113
071B
0.08 U
5760
88
7.2 B
11.1 JL
23000
13700
1 5 BJL
77U
230
069B
36
5970
301
85B
485JL
23400
12100
1 6 BJL
81U
269
063B
40
7670
298
81B
41 6JL
22300
4430
076 UJK
22BU
42 2 B
021B
012B
4420
88
33B
104JL
8630
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 1 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station 10:
Sample 10:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS001
CR-003-SD
05/14/2001
0 in to 3 in
11.4
6540
475
156
2470 JL
0.87 U
1.2B
259 B
1.0U
007U
361
77.9
CS002
CR-001-SD
05/14/2001
0 in to N/A
223
3460
434
8.0 B
1250JL
084U
080B
184B
0.97 U
006U
30.0
149
CS003
CR-004-SD
05/15/2001
0 in to 4 in
6.1
4340
387
85B
1840JL
0.91 U
10B
532 B
1.0 U
006U
513
54.3
CS004
CR-005-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 In
219
6990
719
246
2570 JL
1.3U
17B
345 B
15U
0.66
369
523
CS005
CR-006-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
238
7720
533
241
2230 JL
1 2U
1 68
359 B
1 4U
049
362
600
CS006
CR-007-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
62
3140
181
96B
763 BJL
087U
048B
197B
099U
006U
173
368
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
2150
8830
1000U
8060
8900
1420
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
5<
30
30
35
0
30
40
30
0
0
70
30
0
0
60
40
0
0
60
40
5<
90 >
5<
0
A blank cell indicates analysu was not performed or Ihe
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 2 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS007
CR-OOa-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 2 in
CS008
CR-009-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS009
CR-010-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 7 in
CS010
CR-011-SD
05/17/2001
0 In to 0 Sin
CS011
CR-012-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 2 in
CS012
CR-013-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(Z-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrm
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
49U
49U
25U
25U
49U
49U
25 U
49 U
49 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
2.6 U
26U
5.0 U
5.0 U
26 U
SOU
SOU
36U
36U
19U
19U
36U
36U
19U
36U
36 U
36U
3.6 U
1 8U
1 8U
36U
36U
18U
36 U
36 U
62U
62U
32U
32U
62U
62U
32 U
62 U
62 U
62U
62U
32U
— 32U
- 62U
„.. 62U
32 U
38 JQ
17JQ
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Banum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
4700
085UJK
4.0 U
574
024B
0.33 B
2510
15.7
3.6 B
11.8 JL
14400
8240
0.97 BJL
5.1 U
105
0.42 B
0.73 B
13200
23.3
6.9 B
22.5 JL
16600
7440
0.65 UJK
66
61 1
029B
0.25 B
3350
20.4
6.7 B
21.9 JL
16500
21200
0.63 UJK
50
227
0.84 B
44
4920
140
5.8 B
33.9 JL
14300
14300
3 6 BJL
137
512
077B
81
14100
357
94B
917JL
28300
14300
3 3 BJL
149
596
078B
94
15900
359
94B
868JL
29600
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 3 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:,
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS007
CR-008-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 2 In
215
2760
267
105B
672 BJL
096U
0.71 B
200 B
1 1U -
007U
27.7
77.9
CS008
CR-009-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 4 in
244
5990
376
21.0
1770JL
1.1 U
094B
289 B
1.3U
0.08 U
320
99.0
CS009
CR-010-SD
05/17/2001
0 In to 7 in
167
4860
250
21 0
1070 BJL
0.74 U
085B
231 B
085U
005U
27.9
909
CS010
CR-011-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 0 5m
866
3220
347
14.4
1400 JL
072U
0.76 B
287 B
082U
0.14
26.7
230
CS011
CR-012-SD
05/17/2001
0 in to 2 in
464
11200
808
270
2520 JL
1 5U
27B
406 B
1 7U
1 7
399
1060
CS012
CR-013-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 3 in
535
12400
698
274
2500 JL
1 4U
27B
429 B
1 7U
097
406
1210
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
2040
9250
1000U
29400
17200
13400
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
65
15
20
0
60
30
10
0
90
5
5
0
0
60
40
0
0
60
40
0
0
60
40
A blank call indicates analysis was not perforated or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 4 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS013
CR-014-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS014
CR-015-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS015
CR-016-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 8 in
CS016
CR-017-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 1 in
CS017
CR-018-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 6 in
CS017
CR-066-SD
05/18/2001
18 in to 24 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
41U
4.1 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
4.1 U
41U
21 U
41 U
41 U
7.2 U
72U
3.7 U
37U
72U
7.2 U
37 U
72 U
72 U
38U
38U
2.0 U
2.0 U
38U
3.8 U
20 U
38 U
38 U
35U
35U
1.8U
1 8U
35U
35U
18U
35 U
35 U
42U
42U
22U
22U
42U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
4 1U
4 1 U
2 1U
- 21U
-'4 1U-
._4 1U
21 U
41U
41 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
12800
32BJL
190
755
064B
11 1
27000
25.9
74B
734JL
26800
15400
4.1 BJL
12.3
468
083B
7.5
12100
38.0
10B
111JL
29400
9120
15 BJL
62
229
0.46 B
3.4
7040
21 1
59B
49.2 JL
16800
13600
1 5 BJL
85
261
0.71 B
3.8
7150
286
8.7 B
730JL
23800
9540
2 4 BJL
131
1030
053B
86
34900
252
65B
677JL
25900
15600
0 72 UJK
28
175
0 55 B
043B
5560
94
40B
156JL
11500
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or me
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 5 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS013
CR-014-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 4 in
841
18100
515
219
1970JL
0.83 U
19B
301 B
095U
16
38.5
1460
CS014
CR-015-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 4 in
440
10300
610
285
2680 JL
1.7U
2.9 B
490 B
1 9U
1.0
42.4
1000
CS015
CR-016-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 8 in
190
6130
294
165
1630 JL
076U
1.4B
249 B
087U
054
25.8
470
CS016
CR-017-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 1 in
162
7240
572
240
2290 JL
084B
17B
248 B
' 080U
031
372
462
CS017
CR-018-SD
05/18/2001
0 in to 6 in
439
21400
420
227
1590JL
086U
1 8B
276 B
098U
093
339
1180
CS017
CR-066-SD
05/18/2001
18 in to 24 in
268
2970
315
92B
1060B
082U
032B
381 B
094U
006U
192
842
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
11900
22600
8630
23100
16600
10400
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
5<
1<
35
60
0
0
40
60
0
20
40
40
0
5<
40
55
0
20
50
30
10
20
40
30
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 6 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS018
CR-019-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 6 5m
CS019
CR-020-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 5 in
CS020
CR-023-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS021
CR-022-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS022
CR-024-SD
05/21/2001
0 m to 4 in
CS023
CR-025-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 25m
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/RGBs (ug/kg)
4,41-ODE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
3.8 U
38U
1.9U
19U
3.8 U
38U
19U
38 U
38 U
78U
7.8 U
4.0 U
40U
78U
7.8 U
40 U
78 U
78 U
8.2 U
8.2 U
4.2 U
42U
82U
8.2 U
42 U
82 U
82 U
6.7 U
6.7 U
3.5 U
35U
67U
67U
35 U
67 U
67 U
87U
87U
45U
45U
87U
87U
45 U
87 U
87 U
33U
33U,
1 7U
1 7U
3 3 U
--' 33U
17U
— 33 U
33 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
8180
1.7BJL
78
422
043B
4.9
12400
189
5.4 B
406JL
17400
11900
2.1 BJL
4.5 B
231
0.62 B
1.4B
9340
20.4
7.4 B
41.8JL
20400
6670
5.4 BJL
6.8
180
0.39 B
1.8 B
7630
17.0
5.4 B
667JL
15500
12800
3 6 BJL
95
364
0.69 B
6.5
8230
331
9.2 B
882JL
25200
11600
3 4 BJL
103
240
060B
59
7740
304
79B
676JL
22400
'10400
1 OBJL
4 2
190
063B
1 6
5470
257
82B
539JL
18000
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 7 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS018
CR-019-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 6 5m
232
8970
337
166
1490
077U
0.78 B
242 B
089U
043
24.2
581
CS019
CR-020-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 5 In
649
7000
392
187B
2020 B
19U
0.75 B
480 B
22U
0.14 U
26 7B
250
CS020
CR-023-SD
05/19/2001
0 in to 4 in
727
5610
303
136B
1270B
1.9 U
1.1 B
426 B
22U
0.13U
20.2 B
455
CS021
CR-022-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 4 in
441
8200
673
25.9
2440
1.5U
2.0 B
471 B
1.8U
1.2
358
901
CS022
CR-024-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 4 in
282
7930
392
23 2 B
2280 B
20U
1 SB
623 B
23U
090
337
617
CS023
CR-025-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 25in
938
6150
392
230
2390
068U
098B
186B
078U
025
321
280
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
10700
21500
26400
12600
10200
15500
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
40
40
20
0
1<
60
40
0
10
50
40
0
1<
60
40
0
0
60
40
0
50
40
10
A blank cell indicates analysis was nol performed or Ihe
result was rejecled during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 8 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID-
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS024
CR-062-SD
06/08/2001
18 into 24 in
CS025
CR-026-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 3 in
CS026
CR-029-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 3 in
CS027
CR-027-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 4 In
CS028
CR-028-SD
05/21/2001
0 In to 2 in
CS029
CR-030-SD
05/21/2001
0 m to 2 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4.4'-DOT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
SOU
SOU
26U
26U
SOU
SOU
26 U
SOU
SOU
7.8 U
7.8 U
40U
40U
7.8 U
7.8 U
40 U
78 U
78 U
5.4 U
5.4 U
28U
2.8 U
5.4 U
54U
52
54U
54U
5.5 U
5.5 U
2.8 U
28U
55U
5.5 U
28 U
55 U
55 U
72U
72U
37U
37U
72U
72U
37 U
72 U
72 U
34U
34U
1 7U ' '
-- 1 7U
- 34U - -
34U
17U
34 U
34 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6810
1.6BUJK
5.8
147
0.29 B
0.10U
162000
12.9
4.7 B
181JL
11700
9920
4.9 BJL
10.6
505
0.54 B
4.3
21200
250
7.9 B
120JL
27500
8000
4.8 BJL
95
375
0.44 B
2.9
16600
21.9
7.7 B
118JL
23000
9090
1.3 BJL
34B
113
058B
0.29 B
4800
21 1
6.0 B
250JL
16000
12400
3 9 BJL
97
370
067B
28
16100
301
96B
114JL
29000
v 7150
1 9 BJL
70
342
037B
32
11500
177
SOB
657JL
15900
A blank call Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 9 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS024
CR-062-SD
06/08/2001
18 in to 24 in
67JL
5090
327
143
1330B
1.2 U
0.32 BU
337 BU
13U
O.OBU
166B
423
CS025
CR-026-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 3 In
211
13800
528
214
1960B
18U
2.0 B
483 B
21U
0.49
30.5
855
CS026
CR-029-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 3 in
159
11100
411
180
1560B
1.2 U
1.8B
354 B
1.4U
0.20
25.6
940
CS027
CR-027-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 4 in
21.3
5190
284
16.2
1380B
1.3U
0.52 B
385 B
15U
009U
29.0
104
CS028
CR-028-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 2 in
149
11900
589
248
2480
1 6U
17B
397 B
1 9U
017B
367
787
CS029
CR-030-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 2 in
208
7940
256
14 1
1250
068U
1 5B
200 B
078U
053
21 4
600
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
15BOO
24600
13700
18100
21200
11900
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
1
45
45
10<
0
25
40
35
0
35
40
25
0
35
40
25
0
25
40
35
0
30
40
30
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 10 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS030
CR-031-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 1 in
CS031
CR-032-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 2 In
CS032
CR-033-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
CS033
CR-034-SO
05/22/2001
0 in to 5 In
CS034
CR-036-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
CS035
CR-035-SD
05/22/2001
0 m to 25in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
34U
34U
1 8U
1 8U
3.4 U
,_ 34U
18U
34 U
34U
52U
52U
2.7 U
2.7 U
5.2 U
5.2 U
27 U
52 U
52 U
36U
36U
1 8U
18U
3.6 U
3.6 U
18U
36 U
36 U
40U
40U
21U
21U
40U
40U
21 U
40 U
40 U
35U
35U
1 8U
1 8U
35U
35U
18U
35 U
35 U
34U
34U
1 7U
:i 7U
"134U
JJ4U
17U
34 U
34 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
11200
4.7 BJL
11 1
624
0.62 B
72
20500
306
9.0B
205 JL
26800
6940
215JL
11.5
533
038B
4.3
26300
299
107B
387 JL
36300
9410
4.7 BJL
8.7
295
054B
3.5
15400
264
86B
150JL
24700
9240
70 BJL
130
618
051B
69
26100
294
9.0 B
251 JL
28900
8720
5 7 BJL
107
391
049B
36
19600
258
86B
156JL
25500
8540
2 2 BJL
79
255
045B
23
10800
234
73B
768JL
19800
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result wet rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 11 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS030
CR-031-SD
05/21/2001
0 In to 1 In
369
14200
388
231
1820
1 1
3.1
258 B
0.80 U
1.1
33.1
1250
CS031
CR-032-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 2 in
256
11800
661
160
1440B
1.6 B
3.4
374 B
1.6B
0.40
23.6
2560
CS032
CR-033-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
165
10200
481
21.1
1900
0.97 B
2.1 B
266 B
084U
0.19
29.4
1030
CS033
CR-034-SD
05/22/2001
0 In to 5 In
392
15300
435
209
1620
12
32
269 B
092U
073
302
1660
CS034
CR-036-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
190
12800
545
198
1760
069U
22
207 B
079U
032
286
1100
CS035
CR-035-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 25in
112
8570
467
191
1610
068U
1 2B
237 B
078U
016
283
592
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
27800
9170
29300
20900
18700
15800
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
30
40
30
0
70
27
3
0
30-40
60
10<
0
40
45
15
0
30
40
25
5
30
55
10
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
resull was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 12 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS036
CR-037-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 2 in
CS037
CR-036-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 2 In
CS038
CR-039-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 3 In
CS039
CR-040-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS040
CR-041-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
CS041
CR-042-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCS- 1 260 (Araclor 1260)
34U
34U
1.8U
1 8U
34U
34U
18U
34 U
34 U •
3.4 U
34U
1.7U
1.7 U
34U
34U
17U
34U
34U
34U
34U
1.7U
17U
34U
34U
17U
34 U
34U
35U
35U
1.8U
18U
35U
35U
18U
35 U
35 U
34U
34U
1 7U
1 7U
34U
34U
17U
34 U
34 U
33U
33U
1 7U
- 1 7U
-, 33U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
8790
10 8 BJL
104
438
039B
28
22300
281
10.6
309 JL
42300
18900
17,2 JL
269
1070
0.74 B
28
49600
59.1
22.3
1460 JL
176000
12400JL
10 4 BJL
173JH
603 JK
053B
2.1
28900 JL
35.1 JL
15.1 JL
823
1 09000 JL
4950 JL
34BUJ
96JH
768 JK
0.28 B
5.3
46900 JL
125JL
41 BJL
102
25000 JL
6520 JL
192JL
91JH
452 JK
034B
1 9
24700 JL
271 JL
120JL
362
37600 JL
6550 JL
17 2JL
87JH
495 JK
0328
21
28200 JL
328JL
137JL
451
48200 JL
A blank call Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 13 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS036
CR-037-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 2 in
209
10300
946
150
1400
1 4
21
384 B
081B
0.16
27.1
3090
CS037
CR-038-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 2 in
1590
7230
3390
103
3620
068U
4.0
1310
40
0.07 B
39.0
24900
CS038
CR-039-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 3 in
784 JL
5020 JL
2090 JL
8.5
2300 JL
42
29
723 B
2.4
013
29.5 JL
13900
CS039
CR-040-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 4 in
289 JL
25000 JL
442 JL
109
883 BJL
0.82 B
063B
228 B
1 1B
0.29
23.0 JL_
1990
CS040
CR-041-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
172 JL
9750 JL
743 JL
11 1
1330JL
1 8
2 1
377 B
12B
008B
21 5JL
2770
CS041
CR-042-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 3 in
175JL
9960 JL
908 JL
102
1260JL
2 1
22
475 B
078U
0078
21 4JL
3760
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
9450
1380
1680
4830
5510
3460
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
1<
60
40
1<
5
60
30
5
15
55
30
0
0
65-70
30
5<
1
74
25
0
1 <
90
10
1<
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 14 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS042
CR-043-SD
05/23/2001
0 In to 2 in
CS043
CR-044-SD
05/23/2001
0 In lo 2 In
CS044
CR-045-SD
05/31/2001
0 In to 4 In
CS045
CR-046-SD
05/31/2001
0 In to 3 In
CS046
CR-047-SD
05/31/2001
0 In to 1 in
CS047
CR-048-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 1 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
-
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4.4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrm
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
33U
33U
1 7U
1 7U
33U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
3.4 U
34U
17U
1.7U
34U
34U
17U
34U
34U
33U
33U
17U
1.7U
3.3 U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
33U
33U
1.7U
1 7U
3.3 U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
36U
36U
1 9U
1 9U
36U
36U
19U
36 U
36 U
33U
33U
1 7U ""
• 1 7U
.. '„-. 3 3 U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
9280 JL
207JL
139JH
632 JK
0.43 B
1.6
26500 JL
448JL
17.7JL
720
79700 JL
15500JL
27.1 JL
20.3 JH
1140 JK
069B
1.6
46900 JL
768JL
35.2 JL
1550
1 37000 JL
21100
535
25.5
2160
099B
006U
69900
142
59.0
2900 JL
239000
4710
99B
76
486
027B
4.8
54000
20.7
84B
245 JL
28000
17400
575
303
1970
086B
007U
57600
135
735
2520 JL
176000
17800
452
21 6
1690
0778
019B
66400
112
473
2160JL
178000
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 15 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS042
CR-043-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 In
446 JL
5520 JL
1500JL
96
1740JL
32
39
666 B
23
013
262JL
8710
CS043
CR-044-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
1040JL
5780 JL
3060 JL
122
3750 JL
45
57
1660
46
006B
39.2 JL
15000
CS044
CR-045-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 4 in
316
5770 JL
4040
170
4300
068UJK
75
2210
078U
005U
423
20100
CS045
CR-046-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 3 In
199
26600 JL
585
104
888 B
0 67 UJK
16B
269 B
077U
0.06 B
221
2430
CS046
CR-047-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 1 in
409
5040 JL
3680
156
3580
1 4JL
102
2230
087U
006U
391
17500
CS047
CR-048-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 1 in
417
10000JL
3240
144
3490
0 68 UJK
74
1610
078U
005U
377
18200
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
1950
1000U
1000U
5250
1210
2160
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
90
10
0
10
90
0
0
0
90-100
10<
0
1
80
20 <
0
5
95
0
0
1<
99-100
0
0
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 16 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CS048
CR-049-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 3 in
CS049
CR-050-SD
06/01/2001
0 In to 2 in
CS050
CR-051-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 2 in
CS051
CR-052-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 4 in
CS052
CR-053-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS001
TR-056-SO
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4.4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrin
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
33U
33U
17U
1 7U
33U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
3.4 U
3.4 U
1 8U
18U
34U
34U
18U
34U
34U
39U
39U
20U
2.0 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
20 U
39 U
39 U
33U
33U
1 7U
17U
33U
33U
17U
33 U
33 U
38U
38U
1 9U
1 9U
38U
38U
19U
38 U
38 U
.
if
•>
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
18100
349
303
1660
0.75 B
006U
58600
113
338
2160 JL
179000
18700
7.4 B
76
681
0.71 B
006U
46900
64.0
15.0
997 JL
165000
8170
200
11.8
763
0.38 B
2.4
25300
30.2
7.9 B
444 JL
67100
21100
61.3
42.8
2440
10B
006U
72400
165
85.7
3300 JL
245000
11000
51.4
231
989
057B
007U
30800
720
334
1330JL
96900
13600
1 1B
62
172
067B
052B
5080
248
78B
190
18700JK
A blank celt indicates analysis was not performed or tha
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF • CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 17 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
CS048
CR-049-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 3 In .
317
6030 JL
3130
130
3480
14JL
59
1530
0.76 U
005U
36.3
16500
CS049
CR-050-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 2 In
282
5750 JL
2950
8.1 B
3770
2.1JL
37
1050
079U
0.05 U
38.2
15400
CS050
CR-051-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 2 In
309
8540 JL
1080
125
1400
14JL
27
385 B
091U
029
28.8
4900
CS051
CR-052-SD
06/01/2001
0 In to 4 in
512
5970 JL
4360
194
4330
068UJK
126
2630
078U
005U
450
22300
CS052
CR-053-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 3 in
276
3990 JL
1990
136
2160
1 5JL
85
1000B
089U
006U
286
8820
TS001
TR-056-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
377
5060
588
201
3100JL
089B
067B
258 B
092U
006U
31 0
858
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
1000U
1000U
8720
1000U
3130
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
100
0
0
0
100
0
0
1
74
25
1<
0
100
0
0
0
85
15
0
0
5
90
5
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 18 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date,
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS002
TR-057-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 0 Sin
TS003
TR-058-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 3 In
TS004
TR-059-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 In
TS005 TS006
TR-061-SD TR-062-SD
06/03/2001 06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in 0 in to 2 in
TS007
TR-060-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
13U
13U
6.8 U
5.9 JQ
13U
13U
68 U
130 U
130 U
46U
46U
2.4 U
24U
46U
46U
27
46 U
46 U
3 1 JQ
37U
0 73"JQ
1 9U
„.. 3 7 U
1 5JQ
19U
37 U
* 37 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
12900
089B
66
155
069B
030B
9080
320
94B
23.9
21800JK
14400
0.76 UJK
62U
159
072B
0.08 U
7180
29.4
9.0 B
25.2 JL
21700
8360
29U
46B
130 B
0.45 B
0.29 U
13400
198
61B
128B
17000 JK
3170 7830
094UJK 10U
37U 47
49 38 140
020B 040B
0.09 U 010U
1630 15800
89 183
24B 53B
4.7 BJL 99
6600 12800JK
12500
068 UJK
571)
151
055B
0388
31800
245
76B
21 6JL
17200
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 19 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 • Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS002
TR-057-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 0 Sin
27.7
7920
546
27.5
3100 JL
1 1B
0.75 B
344 B
090U
0.05 U
41 4
84.5
TS003
TR-058-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 3 in
14.8
6720
612
253
3530
1.1 BJH
066B
326 B
0.99 U
006U
37.7
858
TS004
TR-059-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
8.6
3520 B
939
157B
1560BJL
3.7 B
0.77 U
' 685 B
37U
0.24 U
194B
492
TS005
TR-061-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 in
2.9
1580
172
64B
629 B
1.1U
0.25 U '
265 BU
1 2U
008U
85B
19.5
TS006
TR-062-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
81
3590
907
144
1590BJL
22
061B
394 B
1 3U
008U
199
491
TS007
TR-060-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
266
5030
453
21 3
2810
082 BJH
048B
309 B
088U
006U
238
735
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
19300
2710
18400
Grain Size (%)
Percent Grave!
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
1<
100
0
5
30
65
0
0
30
70
1<
0
90
10
0
0
60
40
1<
5
75
20
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 20 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS008
TR-064-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS009
TR-063-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS010
TR-065-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS011
TR-066-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 In
TS012
TR-068-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 3 in
IS0 13
TR-067-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrm
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260(Aroclor1260)
£
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
12100
095B
46
160
060B
079B
6970
227
67B
188
17200JK
14000
0.80 BJL
62
201
0.64 B
0.07 U
31200
299
85B
23.7 JL
19900
3770
13U
4.6
157
0.20 B
0.18 B
131000
210
2.5 B
94B
5460 JK
13100
089B
3.7
218
066B
0.70 B
32200
27.5
6.6 B
24.4
18100JK
13200
0 81 BJL
35U
108
065B
008B
6460
305
7.0 B
222JL
19100
5060
TOUJK'
54U
106
022B
010B
65700
153
34B
93JL
10300
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or (he
result wa« rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 21 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS008
TR-064-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
449
5010
540
176
3890 JL
076U
059B
295 B
087U
006U
281
127
TS009
TR-063-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
15.9
9140
482
24.9
3770
0.78 U
050B
372 B
0.89 U
0.06 U
32.9
688
TS010
TR-065-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
5.6
2700
170
10B
830 BJL
3.6
036U
411 B
1.7 U
011U
92B
309
TS011
TR-066-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
534
6800
652
202
3180JL
082U
0.53 B
370 B
094U
006U
328
818
TS012
TR-068-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 3 in
148
6740
249
206
2720
081U
060B
376 B
093U
0.06 U
288
710
TS013
TR-067-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
64
3290
122
143
818B
1 1U
027U
341 BU
1 3U
008U
136B
352
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
15
85
0
0
100
0
0
20
80
0
0
0
10
80
10
0
40
60
0
0
75
25
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 22 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS014
TR-069-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS015
TR-070-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS016
TR-071-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS017
TR-072-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS018
TR-073-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS019
TR-074-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 2 m
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
.PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
,.-,
_*
>
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
5890
1.4U
2.8 B
144
034B
014U
168000
141
35B
11 9
831 OJK
5940
15UJK
9.5 U
90 SB
0.28 B
015B
8190
208
60B
156JL
14200
5600
0 96 BUJK
10
68.9
0.28 B
007U
3720 JK
122
4.2 B
18.0JL
10800
11800
10BJL
3.8
139
0.58 B
007U
4650 JK
21.8
65B
171JL
16200
10800
0 71 UJK
33
120
051B
007U
16100JK
236
60B
191 JL
15700
6920
066 UJK
38
71 3
029B
007U
10800JK
17 1
55B
14 1 JL
15000
A blank cell indicates analysis was nol performed or the
result was rejected during enalysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT.frx
12/13/2001 Page 23 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS014
TR-069-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
58
4500
292
114B
1580BJL
1.6B
037U
472 B
1.8U
0.12U
148B
307
TS015
TR-070-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 in
80
3890
1130
153B
1090B
1.7U
0.52 B
544 B
2.0 U
0.12U
21 1B
469
TS016
TR-071-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
102JH
2930
284
124
1420
0.74 U
032B
204 B
085U
006U
191
45.6
TS017
TR-072-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 1 in
17.3 JH
4900
438
17.5
3110
076U
0.49 B
260 B
087U
006U
258
641
TS018
TR-073-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 in
11 7JH
7110
397
177
3420
080U
034B
295 B
092U
006U
264
606
TS019
TR-074-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 2 in
84JH
4930
297
238
1730
075U
039B
1988
086U
006U
189
439
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
90
10
0
0
60
40
0
0
50
50
1<
0
20
80
0
0
10
80
10
20
65
15
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT fnc
12/13/2001 Page 24 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS020
TR-075-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 5m
TS021
TR-076-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 1 Sin
TS022
TR-077-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS023
TR-078-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1. Sin
TS024 TS025
TR-079-SD TR-080-SD
06/06/2001 06/06/2001
0 in to 3 in 0 in to 5 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrm
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
SOU
SOU
26U
26U
SOU
SOU
26 U
SOU
SOU
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Aisenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6450
21BJL
44BU
7868
035B
0.15U
10900
176
348
129JL
9740
11400
084BJL
66
146
058B
0.298
13300
268
758
233JL
19300
7770
15BJL
35B
173
037B
0138
34300 JK
209
5.38
134JL
13800
10100
13UJK
53
201
055B
0.13U
83500 JK
236
71B
21.1JL
16200
13400 9340
1 1 BUJK " 1 1 BUJK
49 45
143 74 5
070B 041B
006U 006U
5340 JK 3400 JK
35 1 20 5
108 69B
267JL 169JL
24100 16100
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or tha
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 25 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS020
TR-075-SD
06/03/2001
0 In to 2 5m
85
3070
291
102B
1300B
2.2 BJH
040U
480 BU
20U
0.12 U
162B
502
TS021
TR-076-SD
06/03/2001
Om to 1.5in
24.9
7320
439
247
2980
071U
063B
337 B
0.82 U
0.05 U
40.6
110
TS022
TR-077-SD
06/06/2001
0 In to 2 in
86JH
4150
363
19.8
1430B
1.3 U
0.38 B
378 B
15U
0.09 U
275
631
TS023
TR-078-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 5m
11.0JH
7170
414
21 1
2580
14U
036B
476 B
1.7U
011U
31.8
77.1
TS024
TR-079-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 3 in
147JH
7090
594
319
3950
072U
0788
1978
083U
005U
369
828
TS025
TR-080-SD
06/06/2001 x
0 in to 5 in
168JH
4660
359
196
1900
072U
049B
188 B
083U
005U
246
688
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
20400
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
10
50
40
0
20
55
25
, 0
60
30
10
0
10
90
1<
1<
30
65
5<
0
65
35
0
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT.frx
12/13/2001 Page 26 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample 10:
Sample Date.
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS026
TR-081-SD
06/03/2001
0 In to 2 In
TS027
TR-082-SD
06/04/2001
0 In to 3 In
TS028
TR-083-SD
06/0672001
0 In to 2 in
TS029
TR-084-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 1 1n
TS030
TR-085-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 5m
TS031
TR-086-SD
06/06/2001
0 \n to 8 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl> Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
45U
10JL
23U
23U
45U
4 5U
23 U
45U
45 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
4500
1 1UJK
31BU
46 1B
0.25 B
011U
2340
76
1 9B
3.7 BJL
6280
8890
14B
4.1
160
044B
0.1 SB
7610
14.8
6.0 B
145
12600JK
8550
1.7 BJL
72
164
0.39 B
016U
22800 JK
186
7.1 B
21 8JL
16300
6760
073 BJL
57U
745
0238
13.1
136000
11.7
438
186JL
12100
6090
0 67 UJK
42
594
027B
017B
4500 JK
134
44B
134JL
11000
3010
4 9 BJL
58
725
013B
24
7750 JK
52
22B
11 8JL
5420
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT fix
12/13/2001 Page 27 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS026
TR-081-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 in
3.1
1670B
106
51B
868 B
1.2U
0,32 B
358 BU
14U
008U
9.1 B
21.4
TS027
TR-082-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
16.7
3650
2020
14.4B
1790BJL
2.2
0.59 B
334 B
1.4U
009U
207
62.5
TS028
TR-083-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 2 in
183JH
4510
1010
221
1680B
18U
0.55 B
427 B
2.1 U
013U
22 SB
90.4
TS029
TR-084-SD
06/03/2001
0 In to 1 in
179
4870
183
456
1110B
076U
022B
253 B
0.87 U
0.06 U
290
727
TS030
TR-085-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 Sin
86JH
3200
285
137
1050B
076U
031B
168 B
088U
006U
178
547
TS031
TR-086-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 8 in
115JH
1450
157
688
1280B
1 4
025B
228 B
1 1 U
0 138
888
180
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
328000
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
/ Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
10
40
50
0
0
35
65
0
0
60
40
1<
40
30
30
1<
0
65
20
15
0
100
0
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected duimg analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT.frx
12/13/2001 Page 28 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS032
TR-087-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS033
TR-088-SD
06/03/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS034
TR-089-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS035
TR-128-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 4 in
TS036
TR-129-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 6 in
TS037
TR-090-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
36U
36U
19U
1 9U
36U
36U
vfl
19U
36U
36U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6880
0 69 UJK
4.6
731
033B
007U
17800JK
120
5.0 B
158JL
13700
12200
3 4 UJK
8.5 BU
188 B
0.64 B
0.94 B
23100
16.3
4.9 B
21 7BJL
14600
4270
0.67 UJK
1.7 B
50.1
022B
007U
9770 JK
96
3.1 B
7.9 JL
8030
8030
0.82 UJK
64JL
163
0.35 B
0.33 B
151000
158
5.2 B
179JL
12300
20000
067 UJK
55JL
301
098B
020B
7790
40 1
141
399JL
27800
5010
1 OB
32
451
027B
047B
5320
103
30B
83
7960 JK
A War* call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result wai rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 29 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS032
TR-087-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 In
8.8 JH
3760
251
16.7
1200
0.78 U
041B
189 B
0901)
0.06 U
172
530
TS033
TR-088-SD
06/03/2001
0 In to 2 In
14.5
3860 B
548
17.4B
1740B
4.8 BJH
0.91 U
1010BU
44U
027U
24 7B
958
TS034
TR-089-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 In
5.1 JH
3170
194
9.3
944 B
0.76 U
0.18B
182 B
0.87 U
0.06 U
14.0
336
TS035
TR-128-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 4 in
12.2 JL
4860
348
18.0
1620
1 5
026B
299 B
1 1U
007U
206
61.2
TS036
TR-129-SD
06/09/2001
0 In to 6 in
373JL
8670
836
384
6120
076U
099B
279 B
087U
006U
448
120
TS037
TR-090-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
237
2150
213
7 9B
1100JL
074U
038B
181 B
084U
005U
137
677
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
35000
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
5
80
15
0
0
10
80
10
0
100
0
0
1<
60
35
5<
1<
5
65
30
0
100
0
0
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 30 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS038
TR-091-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS039
TR-093-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS040
TR-094-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS041
TR-095-SD
06/07/2001
0 In to 2 In
TS042 TS043
TR-096-SD TR-097-SD
06/07/2001 06/04/2001
0 in to 1 in 0 in to 4 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PC Bs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
35U
35U
18U
18U
35U
35U
18U
35 U
35 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
14800
1.6 BJL
193
315
0.71 B
074B
6750
35.1
13.5
39.6 JL
30100
4430
0.84 UJK
1.4B
43 3B
0.21 B
0.08 U
6760 JK
88
2.2 B
6.5 BJL
7670
5120
0 81 BJL
24
515
0.23 B
0.06 U
9240
94
3.0 B
7.9 JL
8670
5610
0.86 UJK
35
54.7 B
0.28 B
009U
3690 JK
128
38B
96JL
10800
8280 3500
2 6 BUJK '1 1 BJL
56 29U
153 30 3B
039B 016B
0.70 B 20
61100JK 1780
11 4 61
52B 17B
187JL 55JL
12800 5010
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result wa» rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 31 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS038
TR-091-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 3 In
956
6710
803
41.6
3920
074U
10B
259 B
0.85 U
011
485
147
TS039
TR-093-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
51JH
2650
152
6.9 B
791 B
095U
0.25 B
245 B
1.1 U
007U
19.2
46.4
TS040
TR-094-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 in
6.7 JL
4470
146
8.2 B
1180
072U
037BU
212 BU
0.82 U
0.05 U
14.4
37.3
TS041
TR-095-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
5.6 JH
3320
326
11.3B
1070B
097U
0.30 B
221 B
1.1 U
007U
181
35.0
TS042
TR-096-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 1 in
11 5JH
4950
235
183B
1620B
27
041 B
453 B
1 8U
012U
244
994
TS043
TR-097-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 4 in
349
1240
670
38B
595 B
074U
028B
219BU
084U
005U
92B
739
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
43600
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
10
70
20
0
5
95
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
60
40
0
0
50
50
0
0
70
30
1
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 32 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS044
TR-104-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 4 In
TS045
TR-105-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 7 In
TS046
TR-106-SD
06/04/2001
0 In to 1 5m
TS047
TR-107-SD
06/04/2001
0 In to 2 in
TS048
TR-098-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS049
TR-099-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bts(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
17JQ
38U
20U
20U
38U
38U
20 U
38 U
38 U
42U
4.2 U
22U
22U
4.2 U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
6.1 U
35JQ
3.1 U
31U
61U
61U
31 U
61 U
61 U
63U
63U
33U
3.3 U
63U
63U
33 U
63 U
63 U
38U
38U
1 9U
1 9U
38U
38U
19U
38 U
38 U
*"
'---
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
8460
0.73 UJK
5.9 JL
145
033B
058B
98700
130
46B
17.5JL
11900
7050
1.1 BJL
5.3 U
202
0.28 B
0.51 B
152000
10.5
39B
21.2JL
10100
11700
2 2 BJL
96U
101
045B
O.HU
43400
247
10.4B
26.8 JL
23400
8700
12U
39BU
132
046B
012U
10900
12.8
508
104
14000JK
1550
076U
1 4BU
97B
010B
008U
1150B
20B
053B
21B
3220 JK
3870
063 UJK
1 7B
33 5B
023B
006U
2440 JK
59
21B
99JL
5980
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result wat rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 33 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS044
TR-104-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 4 in
179JL
6770
257
14.3
1640
i 7
043B
287 B
094U
006U
237
923
TS045
TR-105-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 7 in
12.4
3310
431
12.6
1540
1.1 BJH
0.30 B
345 B
1.0U
0.06 U
17.4
68.2
TS046
TR-106-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 1 .Sin
132
7910
372
24.1
1700B
1.6 U
073B
479 BU
1.9U
0.21 B
40.9
71.9
TS047
TR-107-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 2 in
110
4850
390
11.8B
1390BJL
1.3U
065B
391 B
1.5U
0.10U
21.3
57.3
TS048
TR-098-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 2 in
1 2
646 B
474
12B
422 BJL
086U
020U
209 B
099U
' 006U
54B
75
TS049
TR-099-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
68JH
1780
126
51B
790 B
072U
017U
169 B
083U
005U
126
232
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
44700
48200
23100
20300
1000U
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
90
10
0
1
5<
90
5
1<
40
60
0
1
15
40
44
20
80
1<
0
0
100
0
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
remit wai rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 34 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS050
TR-125-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS051
TR-100-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 In
TS052
TR-101-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 4 in
TS053
TR-102-SD
06/07/2001
0 In to 2 in
TS054
TR-103-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS055
TR-108-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 1 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4.4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
--
^
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
3760
1 1 BUJK
1.1U
259B
015B
0.08 U
1850
94
1 9B
136JL
5970
8560
0.91 BJL
2.1 B
87.4
041B
056B
10100
215
46B
270JL
11200
2040
0.66 UJK
1 7B
36.8 B
0.14 B
0.07 U
2490 JK
3.9
19B
67JL
5480
3080
0.70 UJK
1.5B
25 8B
0.20 B
0.07 U
1420
59
19B
64JL
5700
3670
0 60 UJK
1 2B
424
022B
006U
2470
84
37B
73JL
6800
3740
088U
28BU
722
023B
009U
13800
99
26B
57B
7270 JK
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 35 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS050
TR-125-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 3 in
5.8 JL
1920
77.5
58B
576 B
091U
0.45 BU
303 BU
1 OU
007U
106B
207
TS051
TR-100-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 3 in
34.0 JL
3580
338
12.3
1870
13B
0.60 BU
255 BU
1.0U
007U
224
65.8
TS052
TR-101-SD
06/07/2001
0 In to 4 in
84JH
1210
449
38B
581 B
075U
018U
139 B
0.86 U
006U
67B
17.5
TS053
TR-102-SD
06/07/2001
0 In to 2 in
3.9 JL
1430
109
48B
792 B
079U
023BU
178 BU
0.91 U
006U
107B
158
TS054
TR-103-SD
06/07/2001
0 in to 2 in
60JL
2440
243
84
1120
068U
038BU
193BU
079U
005U
128
224
TS055
TR-108-SD
06/04/2001
0 in to 1 in
39
2310
288
75B
937 BJL
10U
034B
315B
1 1U
007U
120B
248
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
1 <
70
20
10
0
70
30
0
0
100
0
0
0
85
15
0
0
100
0
0
0
90
5
5
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or ine
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 36 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID.
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS056 TS057 TS058 TS059 TS060 TS061
TR-109-SD TR-110-SD TR-111-SD TR-112-SD TR-113-SD TR-123-SD
06/06/2001 06/06/2001 06/06/2001 06/09/2001 06/06/2001 06/06/2001
0 in to 1. Sin 0 In to 3 In 0 in to 4 in 0 In to 5 in 0 in to 1 in 0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
39U
39U
20U
20U
39U
3.9 U
20 U
39 U
39 U
41U
41U
2.1 U
2.1 U
4.1 U _
4.1 U
21 U
41 U
41 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
5370
074UJK
4.3 JL
114
0.21 B
007U
161000
9-8
34B
122JL
8940
4340 1210 4410 8190 8100
0.78 UJK 0.84 UJK 0.91 BUJK 1 OBJL 1 9BUJK
4.5JL 11 UJK 1.4B 255 300
71.2 11 OB 574 754 110
0.11 B 007B 0.22B 034B 045B
008U 008U 0.08U 006U 21
82800 910 B 22800 16700 10800JK
9.5 1.6B 158 314 161
2.7B 0.60B 2.5B 7 OB 93B
75JL 17BJL 8.2JL 156JL 299JL
11300 2040 8030 17300 19500
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during anal/sis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 37 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS056
TR-109-SD
06/06/2001
Om to 1.5ln
80JL
4540
220
968
1170B
084U
020U
274 B
0.96 U
006U
128
55.5
TS057
TR-110-SD
06/06/2001
0 In to 3 in
47JL
3740
172
9.5 B
607 B
1.1 B
0.21 B
201 B
10U
006U
12.8B
34.4
TS058
TR-111-SD
06/06/2001
0 In to 4 in
15UJK
569 B
64.4
12B
298 B
095U
022U
203 B
1.1 U
0.07 U
3.4 B
7.0
TS059
TR-112-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 5 in
65JL
2780
134
7.4 B
767 B
0.92 B
034 BU
254 BU
1 OU
007U
13.3
32.2
TS060
TR-113-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 in
78JL
5960
296
284
1020
069U
060BU
216BU
079U
005U
280
556
TS061
TR-123-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 3 in
180JH
4530
599
249
1390
076U
064B
188B
087U
006U
257
540
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
33200
1310
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
80
20
0
0
80
20
0
0
100
0
0
10
70
10
10
15
75
10
0
5
90
5
0
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 38 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS062
TR-124-SD
06/06/2001
0 In to 7 in
TS063
TR-126-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 4 In
TS064
TR-037-SD
06/08/2001
0 In to 3 5m
TS065
TR-038-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 1 In
TS066
TR-039-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 1 5m
TS067
TR-114-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4.4'-DDE (p.pf-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
3.4 U
3.4 U
1.7U
1.7U
3.4 U
3.4 U
17U
34U
34U
42U
4.2 U
2.2 U
2.2 U
4.2 U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
3.8 U
3.8 U
19U
19U
38U
38U
19U
38 U
38 U
4 1 U
4 1U
21U
21U
- 4 1 U
L 4 1 U
21 U
41 U
41 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
2600
078UJK
25BJL
40 2 B
012B
008U
3960
65
178
SOBJL
5240
6790
0.61 BUJK
92
734
0.23 B
0.06 U
33400
176
56B
22.0 JL
16500
5210
079UJK
58JL
156
018B
0.39 B
174000
112
40B
14.3 JL
9450
10300
1.5 BUJK
107
124
0.45 B
0.88 B
12500
20.1
7.9 B
300JL
18600
7350
2 5 BUJK
21U
167
034B
050B
106000
214
4.6 B
194JL
13200
1900
081U
1 3B
11 5B
012B
008U
1790
32
091B
1 7B
3370 JK
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 39 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS062
TR-124-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 7 In
5.1JL
1680
129
49B
532 B
088U
024B
210B
1.0U
007U
908
202
TS063
TR-126-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 4 In
8.5 JL
7750
250
17.9
1160
0.68 U
0.73 BU
282 B
0.78 U
005U
30.7
50.5
TS064
TR-037-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 3 5m
28.7 JL
4080
293
113
824 B
089U
0.21 U
275 B
1.0U
007U
11.48
52.0
TS065
TR-038-SD
06/08/2001
0 In to 1 1n
655JL
5340
421
192
2860
080U
066BU
265 BU
092U
005U
283
123
TS066
TR-039-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 1 5m
206JL
6700
167
1518
1760B
38
056BU
562 BU
21U
013U
2018
102
TS067
TR-114-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
1 8U
1620
567
23B
431 BJL
092U
022U
222 B
1 1U
007U
53B
76
Conventional Parameters .
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
6020
15800
45400
2040
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
90
0
10
2
98
0
0
5
75
20
1<
1<
60
40
1<
0
40
55-60
5<
10
90
0
0
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected dunng analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 40 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 • Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID.
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS068
TR-115-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS069
TR-119-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS070
TR-116-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 8 in
TS071
TR-117-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS072
TR-118-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS073
TR-120-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
35U
35U
089JQ
1 8U
35U
0 64 JQ
18U
35 U
35 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
7960
1 OBJL
149JL
116
042B
006U
21000
21.1
79B
288JL
25000
6430
089U
40
49 4 B
038B
009U
2280
136
4.0 B
8.8
12900JK
5530
1.5B
14.2
734
036B
0.66 B
3720
13.3
58B
206
18900JK
7360
16B
425
153
041B
007U
25400
21 5
88B
490
27400 JK
5870
1 7B
179
106
037B
012B
47900
126
74B
590
22200 JK
4190
082U
25BU
31 8B
025B
008U
12400
84
24B
56B
6660 JK
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 41 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS068
TR-115-SD
06/06/2001
0 in to 1 in
142JL
5170
452
24.1
1210
078B
077B
164 B
082U
005U
33.0
785
TS069
TR-119-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
7.1
3640
191
13.3
910BJL
10U
047B
219B
12U
008U
24.7
345
TS070
TR-116-SD
06/05/2001
0 In to 8 in
62.2
2710
230
148
1330JL
1 2
063B
200 B
093U
008B
25.5
838
TS071
TR-117-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 in
14.7
4570
602
31 9
1230JL
10B
078B
182 B
1 1B
0.05 U
35.1
597
TS072
TR-118-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
11 2
5210
495
21 9
812BJL
071U
051B
178 B
081U
005U
248
760
TS073
TR-120-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 3 in
34
6860
140
63B
741 BJL
095B
026B
261 B
1 1U
007U
102B
168
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
10700
Gram Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
10
75
15
0
5
95
0
0
0
90
10
0
0
85
15
0
10
90
0
0
0
100
0
0
A blank call Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 42 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS074
TR-121-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 5 In
TS075
TR-122-SD
06/05/2001
0 In to 2 in
TS076
TR-001-SD
05/21/2001
0 In to 1 in
TS077
TR-002-SD
05/22/2001
0 In to 1 in
TS078
TR-005-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS079
TR-004-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrin
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1254 (Arocior 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
46U
46U
24U
2.4 U
4.6 U
4.6 U
24 U
46 U
46U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
2840
079U
16BU
33.6 B
016B
008U
43700
62
1.5B
35B
4650 JK
4530
0 87 UJK
1.4 B
42 6 B
030B
0.09 U
2870 JK
131
31B
7.3 JL
9730
7070 JL
10BJL
32JH
74.5 JK
032B
086B
6540 JL
144JL
42BJL
11.2
11600JL
7770 JL
94BJL
254JH
406 JK
030B
15.3
17500JL
125JL
5.4 BJL
33.5
15300JL
9190 JL
3 3 BJL
540JH
183JK
045B
21
5390 JL
124JL
81 BJL
31 4
22700 JL
8750JL
3 4 BJL
235JH
128JK
036B
25
24100JL
145JL
6 4 BJL
303
17500JL
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 43 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS074
TR-121-SD
06/05/2001
0 In to 5 in
23
4080
110
44B
419BJL
OB9U
021U
242 B
1 OU
007U
81B
124
TS075
TR-122-SD
06/05/2001
0 in to 2 In
39JH
2860
151
87B
714B
099U
025B
264 B
1 1U
0.07 U
208
24.5
TS076
TR-001-SD
05/21/2001
0 in to 1 in
47.4 JL
3390 JL
190JL
116
1710JL
0.69 U
030B
' 168 B
0.79 U
0.14
19.7JL
78.1
TS077
TR-002-SD
05/22/2001
0 In to 1 in
603 JL
4520 JL
997 JL
142
2020 JL
16B
066B
260 B
1 3U
022
231JL
585
TS078
TR-005-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
855JL
3860 JL
716JL
176
2820 JL
1 5
062B
154B
083U
005U
273JL
146
TS079
TR-004-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
107JL
6170JL
659 JL
178
1870JL
30
055B
222 B
1 OUJK
009B
21 9JL
202
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
2850
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
15
75
10
0
0
100
0
0
0
20
40
20
0
33
67
0
15
50
35
0
15
50 "
35
0
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 44 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet).
TS080
TR-006-SD
05/22/2001
0 In to 1 In
TS081
TR-007-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS082
TR-008-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS083
TR-009-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS084 TS085
TR-010-SD TR-011-SD
05/23/2001 05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in 0 in to 0 5m
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1254(Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260 (Aroclor 1260)
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6080 JL
1 8BJL
98JH
130JK
021B
023B
1 02000 JL
167JL
58BJL
15.5
12700 JL
5770 JL
2.6 BJL
31U
114BJK
0.23 B
1.4B
59900 JL
13 BJL
31 BJL
27.9
9180JL
5650 JL
2 4 BJL
63JH
152JK
0.24 B
24
82600 JL
120JL
3.9 BJL
18.9
9040 JL
6290 JL
3 5 BJL
4.1 JH
115JK
025B
84
34300 JL
14.1 JL
3 4 BJL
413
10700JL
3350 JL 351 OJL
061 UJK '' 1 3 BJL
18BJH 62JH
377BJK 729JK
016B 013B
0 07 B 0 32 B
1780JL 19500JL
68JL 102JL
2 4 BJL 21 BJL
55 101
6340 JL 9260 JL
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 45 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS080
TR-006-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 In
138JL
5740 JL
340 JL
188
1070BJL
22
031U
380 B
1.5UJK
0.09 U
17 9 BJL
794
TS081
TR-007-SD
05/22/2001
0 In to 1 in
543JL
6130 JL
133JL
193B
1540BJL
5.0
061U
611 B
30UJK
019U
14.9BJL
117
TS082
TR-008-SD
05/22/2001
0 in to 1 in
794JL
4970 JL
289 JL
11 7
1540JL
1.1 B
025B
237 B
0.98 UJK
010B
138JL
185
TS083
TR-009-SD
05/23/2001
0 In to 2 in
128JL
5130JL
288 JL
335
1460BJL
3.8
043B
350 B
12 UJK
0.1 1B
289JL
212
TS084
TR-010-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 In
53JL
1610JL
114JL
60B
689 BJL
069U
016U
141 B
0 79 UJK
005U
108JL
274
TS085
TR-011-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 0 5in
157JL
3890 JL
951 JL
97B
647 BJL
1 8
024U
244 B
1 2 UJK
007U
12 2 BJL
103
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
60
30
10
0
30
60
10
0
30
30
40
0
40
30
30
0
95
5
0
0
25
75
0
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 46 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS086
TR-012-SD
05/23/2001
UNK to UNK
TS087
TR-013-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS088
TR-Q14-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS089
TR-016-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS090
TR-040-SO
06/08/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS091
TR-127-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 6 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-ODT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260(Aroclor 1260)
44U
44U
23U
23U
4 4 U
44U
23 U
44 U
44 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
1120 JL
1 2BJL
23JH
119JK
004U
041B
306000 JL
1.5BJL
048BJL
4.0 B
1440JU
924 JL
080UJK
26BJH
145JK
005U
0.77 B
336000 JL
1.7BJL
0.44 BJL
6.3 B
1030JL
9000 JL
2 5 BJL
70JH
126BJK
035B
51
42800 JL
19.7 JL
5 2 BJL
36.0
11700JL
5300
21B
50
980
019B
37
11400
76
2.6 B
15.9 JL
8440
5940
0 90 UJK
97
42 6 B
020B
009U
4590
166
47B
106JL
12500
8710
9 6 BJL
120
288
0378
105
5510
123
45B
15 1JL
11400
A blank nil indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT.frx
12/13/2001 Page 47 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS086
TR-012-SD
05/23/2001
UNKtoUNK
108JL
2980 JL
414JL
33B
296 BJL
073U
0.17U
2058
0 84 UJK
005U
3 6 BJL
285
TS087
TR-013-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 1 in
18.9 JL
3800 JL
46.6 JL
298
265 BJL
091U
0.21 U
276 B
1.0 UJK
006U
2 7 BJL
557
TS088
TR-014-SD
05/23/2001
0 In to 1 m
21.8 JL
4100JL
238 JL
350
1320 BJL
33
070B
723 B
2 5 UJK
016U
24.6 BJL
135
TS089
TR-016-SD
05/23/2001
0 in to 2 in
105
2690 JL
326
74B
1140B
1 4JL
041B
213B
1.1U
007U
133B
421
TS090
TR-040-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 3 in
72JL
4240
192
259
771 B
1 OU
075BU
408 B
1 2U
007U
293
370
TS091
TR-127-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 6 in
405 JL
2770
1210
108
1490
088U
072BU
273 BU
1 OU
008B
177
495
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
9430
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
10
60
30
0
0
60
35
5
1
90
10
0
5<
85
10
1<
0
70
30
1 <
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 48 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS092
TR-041-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 1 in
TS093
TR-017-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS094
TR-018-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS095 TS096 TS097
TR-019-SD TR-042-SD TR-020-SD
05/24/2001 06/08/2001 05/24/2001
0 in to 2 in 0 in to 5 in 0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticides/RGBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DOT)
Atpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260 {Aroclor 1260)
5.1 U
51U
26U
26U
51U
51U
26 U
51 U
51 U
44U
44U
23U
23U
44U
44U
23 U
44 U
44 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
4900
1.5UJK
52
105
017B
016B
49100
149
36B
115BJL
9410
7530 JL
1.2BJL
7.7 JH
84.6 JK
0.31 B
1,3
3030 JL
16.8JL
5.5 BJL
15.5
13500JL
8880
0.63 B
7.0
108
0.34 B
1,1
5440
19.9
4.7 B
13,7 JL
16000
1200 4190 5740
1.7U 12BUJK 12U
22U 48 48JL
59 8 B 42 4 B 148
0.1 1U 021B 024B
0.23B 008U 10B
91500 13700 121000
3.7B 113 147
0.61 U 3 9 B 4 3 B
36BJL 102JL 161JL
2600 10900 9520
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result wea rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtfT frx
12/13/2001 Page 49 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS092
TR-041-SD
06/08/2001
0 In to 1 in
11.3JL
3210
993
99B
705 B
17U
0.49 BU
523 BU
1.9U
012U
16.7B
422
TS093
TR-017-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 2 in
502JL
3700 JL
352 JL
148
1910JL
082B
0.40 B
217 B
0.85 UJK
005U
249JL
970
TS094
TR-018-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
44.0
4300 JL
450
188
1460
0 71 UJK
060B
133 B
0.81 U
005U
237
109
TS095
TR-Q19-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 2 in
5.5
1290BJL
730
29B
300 B
1.9 UJK
044U
317 B
22U
013U
42B
162
TS096
TR-042-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 5 in
93JL
3480
183
11 7
571 B
088U
051 BU
237 BU
1 OU
006U
200
484
TS097
TR-020-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
222
3410JL
564
167
1140B
2 UL
039B
291 B
1 6U
0 10U
16 1B
952
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
' 30400
6900
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
60
30
10<
0
50
40
10
1
40
50
10
0
60
40
0
5
85
10
0
0
40
40
20
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 50 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID-
Sample 10:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS098
TR-022-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
TS099
TR-043-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 4 in
TS100
TR-023-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 1 Sin
TS101
TR-044-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 4 in
TS102 TS103
TR-024-SD TR-025-SD
05/24/2001 05/24/2001
0 in to 1 in 0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endrin Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
44U
44U
23U
23U
63
4.4 U
23 U
44U
44U
40U
40U
21U
21U
40U
40U
21 U
40 U
40 U
.„
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
7140
33B
8.6
273
032B
21.5
155000
21.3
55B
425JL
11700
3090
0.83 UJK
16B
41.58
017B
0.17B
6380
46
16B
39BJL
6230
11500
4.8 B
15.9
210
0.60 B
11.4
16900
231
8.0 B
422JL
19300
6750
0 91 BUJK
38
602
026B
0.11 B
36200
15.7
4.6 B
12.7 JL
13900
11300 2300
1 8 B 1 4 U
77 1 9U
219 198
0 60 B 0 09 U
34 0 86 B
8070 185000
236 48
66B 1 OB
518JL 49BJL
20200 3160
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 51 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS098
TR-022-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
848
4990 JL
277
36.8
1340B
284JL
0.71 B
236 B
12U
0.07 U
21.1
403
TS099
TR-043-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 4 in
13.2JL
2790
113
4.3 B
701 B
0.95 U
040BU
241 BU
1 1U
0.06 U
11.9B
98.4
TS100
TR-023-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 1 Sin
478
5630 JL
594
207
2540
0 92 UJK
1 1B
174 B
1 1U
014B
31.7
581
TS101
TR-044-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 4 in
81JL
4910
208
16.0
1380
0.92 U
059BU
297 BU
1.1U
0.06 U
266
138
TS102
TR-024-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 1 in
208
6580 JL
193
195
1290
1 4JL
10B
173 B
081U
014
338
379
TS103
TR-025-SD
05/24/2001
0 in to 3 in
108
2910JL
301
41B
571 B
1 6 UJK
037U
327 B
1 8U
011U
52B
314
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
7670
9280
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
97
3
0
0
75
25
0
3
87
10
0
0
20
80
0
0
85
15
0
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 52 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS104
TR-045-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 2 in
TS105
TR-047-SD
06/08/2001
0 In to 4 In
TS106
TR-026-SD
05/31/2001
0 In to 2 In
TS107
TR-027-SD
05/31/2001
0 In to 4 In
TS108
TR-028-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 4 5m
TS109
TR-029-SD -
06/01/2001
0 in to 3 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p.p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-4 260 (Aroclor 1260)
46U
46U
2.4 U '
24U
46U
46U
24 U
46 U
46 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
2.1 U
2.1 U
40U
4.0 U
21 U
40 U
40 U
34U
34U
1.8U
1.8U
3.4 U
3.4 U
18U
34U
34U
60U
52J
31U
31U
60U
60U
34
60 U
60 U
SOU
SOU
26U
26U
SOU
SOU
' 36
SOU
SOU
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6480
1 1BJL
37
121
031B
1 8
110000
206
4.5 B
183JL
10800
3480
0.74 UJK
2.6
28.4 B
013B
0.07 U
3330
74
2.1 B
67JL
6850
9470
0.62 UJK
7.7
104
069B
0.06 U
6120
318
7.0 B
21.4JL
18800
8840
081B
7.0
155
048B
054B
10500
261
67B
26.8 JL
18700
5890
24B
45
102
030B
48
5630
144
53B
223JL
14300
8130
089U
49
127
0 19B
079B
15600
138
85B
267JL
19100
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 53 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS104
TR-045-SD
06/09/2001
0 in to 2 in
293JL
4210
223
17.4
1450
1 7
047B
294 BU
1 1U
007U
225
148
TS105
TR-047-SD
06/08/2001
0 in to 4 in
3.3 JL
2470
123
83B
596 B
0.84 U
0.37 BU
255 BU
096U
006U
12.4
212
TS106
TR-026-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 2 in
23.7
6030
348
246
1290
070U
069B
345 B
080U
008B
395
788
TS107
TR-027-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 4 in
738
7400 JL
291
202
1270
1.8JL
074B
260 B
090U
018
323
238
TS108
TR-028-SD
05/31/2001
0 in to 4 Sin
151
3120JL
139
12 1B
1540 B
24JL
067B
148 B
1 4UJK
009U
249
220
TS109
TR-029-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 3 in
165
4290 JL
358
298
694 B
1 6JL
079B
139B
1 2UJK
007U
182
134
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
42700
1000U
4980
57700
13200
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
1
70
25
5
5
95
0
0
10
50
40
0
10
50
30
10<
0
50
40
10
5
55
30
10
A blank cell indicates analysu was not perfofmed or the
result we« rejected dunng analysis
SDDDL1SD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 54 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID;
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
TS110
TR-030-SD
06/01/2001
0 m to 8 m
US001
BK-150-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 3 in
US002
BK-152-SD
06/28/2001
0 In to 2 in
US003
BK-153-SD
06/28/2001
0 in to 4 in
US004
BK-155-SD
06/28/2001
0 in to 2 in
US005
BK-130-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 3 m
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pesticldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p.p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
43U
59JQ
22U
22U
4 3U
43U
22 U
43 U
43 U
5.1 U
5.1 U
2.6 U
26U
5.1 U
5.1 U
26 U
51 U
51 U
42U
42U
22U
22U
4.2 U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
38U
38U
20U
20U
38U
3.8 U
20 U
38 U
38 U
39U
39U
20U
20U
39U
39U
20 U
39 U
39 U
53U
53U
27U
27U
53U
53U
27 U
53 U
,' 53 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
6850
14.3 JL
214
514
026B
28
2480
126
22B
22.7 JL
10900
3750
92U
6.7
166
020U
462JK
21 4000 JK
70
2.2 B
28.5 JK
7050
5120
72U
1.5B
342B
017U
0.35 BJK
1160BJK
7.9
48B
6.1 BJK
14300
9960
68U
047U
192B
0.1 7 U
005UJK
91 5 BJK
164
105B
8.7 JK
24500
7950
65U
26
684
036U
0 38 BJK
1520JK
141
93B
127JK
13600
3410
86U
1 9B
50 8 B
020U
006 BJK
1760JK
228
1 6U
3 7 BJK
4520
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or (he
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 55 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
TS110
TR-030-SD
06/01/2001
0 in to 8 in
589
3480
176
80B
1660
081BJH
1 1B
326 B
0.88 U
019
178
279
US001
BK-150-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 3 in
20.3
2660
177
667
353 B
060U
0.85 UJL
83 6 B
091U
0.08 U
123B
1880
US002
BK-152-SD
06/28/2001
0 In to 2 In
6.4
2230
178
199
335 B
076B
0 67 UJL
27.4 U
072U
006U
140
60.0
US003
BK-153-SD
06/28/2001
0 in to 4 in
50
4490
235
200
233 B
044U
063 UJL
29 9U
068U
006U
62B
490
US004
BK-155-SD
06/28/2001
0 in to 2 in
148
3290
699
203
556 B
042U
060 UJL
36 4 U
065U
006U
109B
547
US005
BK-130-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 3 in
27
799 B
367
25U
508 B
056U
0 80 UJL
1238
086U
007U
92B
183
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
96600
17100
1000U
1310
19000
7380
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
1
85
13
1
10
85
5
0
5
85
10
0
5
90
5
0
3
92
5
0
3
87
10
0
A WanK call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 56 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
US006
BK-131-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 3 in
US007
BK-134-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 4 In
US008
BK-135-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 6 in
US009
BK-133-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 8 in
US010
BK-139-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 4 in
US011
BK-142-SD
06/26/2001
2 in to 10 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
130JQ
56 JQ
450 U
450 U
220 JQ
400 U
Pesticides/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endrm
Endnn Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1 254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1260(Aroclor1260)
40U
40U
20U
20U
40U
40U
20 U
40 U
40 U
44U
4.4 U
23U
23U
44U
44U
23 U
44U
44 U
46U
46U
23U
2.3 U
46U
46U
23 U
46 U
46 U
41U
41U
21U
21U
4.1 U
41U
21 U
41 U
41 U
42U
42U
22U
22U
42U
42U
22 U
42 U
42 U
33 U
33 U
17U
17U
. 33 U
33 U
170U
330 U
330 U
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
4860
72U
13B
31 1B
027U
0 05 UJK
3740 JK
6.1
27B
5.1 BJK
7020
29300
82U
45
166
079U
028 BJK
6860 JK
21.5
7.5 B
13.9 JK
19200
27000
8.2 U
70
214
0.80 U
3.3 JK
1510JK
9.8
81B
9.8 JK
17800
16000
70U
15B
197
059U
0 05 UJK
2100JK
103
62B
64JK
13200
8660
74U
051U
523
074U
0 05 UJK
1720JK
123
39B
4 6 BJK
13200
2260 JK
34 9 UJK
2 4 UJK
66 5 BJK
024 UJK
1 7 BJK
68500 JK
30 UJK
6 5 UJK
130 BJK
2310JK
A blank call indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 57 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
US006
BK-131-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 3 In
80
1860
148
82B
509 B
047U
0.66 UJL
131 B
071U
006U
10.1 B
200
US007
BK-134-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 4 In
19.2
5190
501
15.9
1210B
089B
0.75 UJL
419B
0.81 U
007U
27.2
135
US008
BK-135-SD
06/25/2001
0 In to 6 In
139
1640
2340
102B
764 B
069B
0 76 UJL
193 B
081U
0.07 U
254
901
US009
BK-133-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 8 in
84
2300
501
108
885 B
096B
064 UJL
140 B
069U
006U
15.6
806
US010
BK-139-SD
06/25/2001
0 in to 4 in
54
2750
194
99B
1210B
073B
069 UJL
90 9 B
074U
006U
145
323
US011
BK-142-SD
06/26/2001
2 in to 10 in
16 UK
2260 BJK
122BJK
141 BJK
398 UJK
12 1 JK
3 2 UJK
213BJK
3 5 UJK
030R
51 9 BJK
420JK
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
5470
4710
309000
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
10
85
5
0
0
50
40
10
0
75
20
5
0
80
20
0
15
85
0
0
0
0
95
5
A blank cell indicate* analysu was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 58 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
US012
BK-140-SD
06/26/2001
0 m to 1 In
US013
BK-138-SD
06/26/2001
0 in to 4 In
US014
TR-147-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 3 in
US015
TR-145-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 2 in
US016
TR-136-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 5 in
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/kg)
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Pestlcldes/PCBs (ug/kg)
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Endnn
Endrm Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
PCB-1254 (Aroclor 1254)
PCB-1 260 (Aroclor 1260)
4.1U
4.1 U
21U
21U
41U
41U
21 U
41 U
41 U
38U
3.8 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
3.8 U
38U
20 U
38 U
38 U
4.3 U
4.3 U
22U
22U
4.3 U
43U
22 U
43 U
43 U
4.1 U
41U
21U
2.1 U
41U
41U
21 U
41 U
41 U
39U
39U
20U
20U
39U
39U
20 U
39 U
39 U '
Inorganics (Total) (mg/kg)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
4440
73U
12B
26 4 B
016U
005UJK
251 OJK
7.3
25B
59BJK
10200
10000
72U
089B
18.5 B
0.19U
0.05 UJK
2620 JK
13.2
5.9 B
42BJK
22800
10500
28.0
862
52 4 B
0.38 U
9.8 JK
4890 JK
288
128B
258JL
29400
8960
2450
6180
556
067U
21 OJK
14400JK
16.9
230
279 JK
62800
10300
637
2850
595
063U
152JK
9120 JK
209
201
106JK
63500
A blank call Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDUSD.DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 59 of 60
-------
Table 2-1 - Sediment Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Total Mercury
Vanadium
Zinc
US012
BK-140-SD
06/26/2001
0 in to 1 in
33
2160
206
8.9 B
696 B
048B
0.67 UJL
65 3 B
0.72 U
006U
9.4 B
18.3
US013
BK-138-SD
06/26/2001
0 in to 4 in
6.4
4260
292
17.0
181 B
057B
066 UJL
73 9 B
0.71 U
0.06 U
12.0B
41 2
US014
TR-147-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 3 in
494
9140
985
216
822 B
051U
0.80 BJL
47.6 B
077U
0.07 U
31.5
1330
US015
TR-145-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 2 in
18300
19200
3520
236
1010B
048U
374JL
40.0 U
073U
035-
354
23600
US016
TR-136-SD
06/27/2001
0 in to 5 in
14100
12800
2300
239
847 B
045U
244JL
55 4 B
1 4U
006U
387
12300
Conventional Parameters
Total Organic Carbon (mg/kg)
1000U
4230
8750
2770
9060
Grain Size (%)
Percent Gravel
Percent Sand
Percent Silt
Percent Clay
0
95
5
0
10
85
5
0
5
90
5
0
10
85
5
0
10
85
5
0
A blank cell Indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SDDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 60 of 60
-------
Table 2-2 - Surface Water Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
CW001
CR-002-SW
05/14/2001
N/A to N/A
CW002 N/A
CR-003-SW CR-001-SW
05/15/2001 ' 05/14/2001
32 n to N/A N/A to N/A
UW001
BK-151-SW
06/27/2001
0 In to N/A
UW002
BK-149-SW
06/28/2001
0 in to N/A
UW003
BK-154-SW
06/28/2001
0 in to N/A
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/l)
Chloroform
26
10U
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/l)
Atrazine
10R
10R
Inorganics (Total) (ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Zinc
168 U
30U
40U
31 OB
030U
21400
1 4BJL
54 6U
1.5 U
5330
4,3 B
1020BJ
3.4 U
4470 B
8.7 B
168U
SOU
40U
31.8B
030U
21500
097BJL
54 6U
1.5U
5360
3.6 B
994 BJ
3.4 U
2600 B
5.9 B
126BJK
32 6 U
22U
77.4 B
16U
83800
34U
165
1.3UJK
24300
83U
1030B
42B
2100B
116
272UJL
32 6 U
22U
072B
1 6U
48 6U
34U
143U
21B
33 6U
044U
372 U
21U
119U
21UJK
272UJL
32 6 U
22U
89B
16U
12500
34U
41 2U
1 3U
2050 B
1 1U
674 B
21U
786 B
1 9UJK
A blank cell indicatas analysu was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SWDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 1 of 2
-------
Table 2-2 • Surface Water Sample Detected Concentrations
Station ID:
Sample ID:
Sample Date:
Constituent Depth (feet):
UW004
BK-132-SW
06/25/2001
0 in to N/A
UW005
BK-143-SW
06/26/2001
0 in to N/A
UW006
BK-141-SW
06/26/2001
0 in to N/A
UW007
TR-148-SW
06/27/2001
0 in to N/A
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/l)
Chloroform
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/l)
Atrazme
Inorganics (Total) (ug/l)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Zinc
2250 JK
32.6 U
22U
22 9B
0.70 U
11800
3.4 U
1650
134JK
2330 B
566
913 B
2.1 U
1230B
13.3 U
1240JK
32 6U
22U
72.0 B
0.49 U
146000
3.4 U
1240
106JK
15600
21.0
1690 B
35B
2740 B
288
272UJK
32 6 U
2.2 U
17 3B
0.22 U
47500
34U
116
1.3UJK
7120
104B
1450B
2.1 U
2680 B
61U
223 JL
845
764
27 7B
26B
37800
60B
1340
41.3
20600
38.7
1240B
21U
2670 B
284
A blank cell indicates analysis was not performed or the
result was rejected during analysis
SWDDL1SD DBF - CHSTdtFT frx
12/13/2001 Page 2 of 2
-------
APPENDIX D
FIGURES DEPICTING DATA RESULTS OF ARSENIC, CADMIUM, COPPER, LEAD,
MERCURY, AND ZINC IN TRIBUTARY SEDIMENT SAMPLES
-------
Ferry
County
EXPLANATION
-0- Station Location
/\/ Streams
® Town
DATA QUALIFIERS
j The analyte was positively identified but the
associated numerical value is an estimate
U The compound was analyzed for, but not
detected.
B The result is below the Contract Required
Detection Limit (CRDL).
0 7,000 14.000
Scale In Feet
Map Extent
Figures Depicting Data Results
of Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper,
Lead, Mercury, and Zinc in
Tributary Sediment Samples
Figure
1 of 2
-------
Arank
O**Jm 0.07 BJ
,«
Uwtuiy OOSU
Ztoc
EXPLANATION
<&• Station Location
Streams
-------
APPENDIX E
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
(Available Upon Request)
-------
APPENDIX F
FIELD SAMPLE RECORD FORMS
(Available Upon Request)
-------
APPENDIX G
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED AND SUMMARY OF SAMPLE
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
ANALYSIS
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirements
Station 10
CW001
CW002
CS001
CS002
CS003
CS004
CS005
CS006
CS007
CS008
CS009
CS010
CS011
CS012
CS013
CS014
Station Description
Grand Coulee Drinking
Water System
distribution
Lake Roosevelt Grand
Coulee Drinking Water
Intake
Lake Roosevelt
Crescent Bay boat
ramp
Lake Roosevelt North
Dam Boat Ramp
Lake Roosevelt Plum
Point
Lake Roosevelt near
Inchelium
Lake Roosevelt at point
south of Hall Creek
Lake Roosevelt at
Mission Point
Lake Roosevelt north of
Daisy Station
Lake Roosevelt south
of Cheweka Creek
Lake Roosevelt south
of Chalk Grade Point
Lake Roosevelt south
of Barnaby Island
Lake Roosevelt on flats
north of Quilllsascut
Creek
Lake Roosevelt on flats
north of Quillisascut
Creek
Lake Roosevelt on flats
between French Point
Rocks and La Fleur
Creek
Lake Roosevelt on mid-
channel bar east of
French Point Rocks
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
NA (splgpt)
32 feet
0-3'
0
0-4"
0-4"
0-4"
0-4"
0-2"
0-4'
0-7"
0 - 0.5"
0-2"
0-3"
0-4"
0-4"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracklno *
01204101
01204102
01204106
01204104
01204107
01204110
01204111
01204112
01204113
01204114
01204116
01204116
01204117
01204118
01204119
01204120
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ08Y3
MJ08Y4
MJ08Y8
MJ08Y6
MJ08Y9
MJ08ZO
MJ08Z1
MJ08Z2
MJ08Z3
MJ08Z4
MJ08Z5
MJ08Z6
MJ08Z7
MJ08Z8
MJ08Z9
MJ0900
Organic CLP
«
JX426
JX427
JX431
JX429
JX432
JX433
JX434
JX435
JX436
JX437
JX438
JX439
JX440
JX441
JX442
JX443
Internal
it 4W
cn-003-sw
CR-003-SD
CR-001-SD
CR-004-SD
CR-005-SD
CR-006-SD
CR-007-SD
CR-008-SD
CR-009-8D
CR-010-SD
CR-011-SD
CR-012-SD
CR-013-SD
CR-014-SO
CR-015-SD
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X '
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
voc
X
X
svoc
X
X
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sample
Date
14-May-01
14-May-01
14-May-Ol
14-May-Ol
15-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
Sample
Time
1435
1130
1800
1900
1300
1000
1045
1130
1330
1415
1445
1600
1700
1030
1100
1230
01-033lrxlsTable 1-2
Page 1 of 11
12/17/01
-------
T«bl« 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirement*
Station ID
CS015
CS016
CS017
CS017
CS018
CS019
CS020
CS021
CS023
CS024
CS025
CS026
CS027
CS028
Station Description
Lake Roosevelt north of
French Point
Lake Roosevelt on flats
North of Bradbury
Beach
Lake Roosevelt on flats
fronting Haag Cove
Lake Roosevelt 'on flats
fronting Haag Cove
Lake Roosevelt on flats
south of Colville River
Lake Roosevelt In bay
at Colville River mouth
Lake Roosevelt south
of Boise Cascade Log
Boom
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats, northwest
of Martin Spring Creek
Marcus Flats,
southwest of Pingston
Creek
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats (west
bank)
Marcus Flats, north of
Pingston Creek
Lake Roosevelt on
Marcus Rats west of
Pingston Creek
Lake Roosevelt.
Marcus Flats, south of
Marcus Island
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats, east of
Kamloops
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats northeast
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-8"
o- r
0-6"
18-24'
0-65"
0-5"
0-4"
0-4"
0 <025"
18-24"
0-3"
0-3"
0-4"
0-2"
Sample Identification
Tracking *
01204121
01204122
01204123
01204124
01204125
01204126
01204127
01214102
01214104
01214106
01234124
01214108
01214114
01214110
01214112
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0901
MJ0902
MJ0903
MJ09E2
MJ0904
MJ0905
MJ0908
MJ0907
MJ0909
MJ0910
MJOBK4
MJ0911
MJ0914
MJ0912
MJ0913
Organic CLP
t
JX444
JX445
JX448
JX550
JX447
JX448
JX451
JX450
JX452
JX453
JX804
JX454
JX457
JX466
JX466
Internal
Sample ID
CR-016-SD
CR-017-SD
CR-018-SD
CR-066-SD
CR-019-SD
CR-020-SD
CR-023-SD
CR-022-SD
CR-024-SD
CR-025-SD
CR-062-SD
CR-026-SD
CR-029-SD
CR-027-8O
CR-028-SD
^^••••^•B
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
P83t/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
voc
svoc
TOC
X
X
X
I
X
X
II
X
x
-•
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
•i^H^^M^M
Sample
Date
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
19-May-01
19-May-01
19-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
08-Jun-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
•OTKHMM^^m
Sample
t^Jun9^
1330
1430
1530
1545
900
1045
1130
1030
1050
1200
945
1245
1415
1330
1445
01-033 Irxls Table 1-2
Page 2 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirements
Station ID
CS029
CS030
CS031
CS032
CS033
CS034
CS035
CS036
CS037
CS038
CS039
CS040
CS041
CS042
CS043
CS044
Station Description
Lake Roosevelt north of
Summer Island
Lake Roosevelt on flats
at Evans Campground
Lake Roosevelt east of
Snag Cove
Lake Roosevelt on flats
south of Bossburg
Lake Roosevelt on flats
north of Bossburg
Lake Roosevelt on flats
south of North Gorge
least bank)
Lake Roosevelt on flats
south of North Gorge
[west bank)
Lake Roosevelt east of
Flat Creek [north bank)
Lake Roosevelt at
China Bar
Lake Roosevelt near
navigation light south of
Crown Creek
Lake Roosevelt north of
Rattlesnake Creek
(east bank)
Lake Roosevelt north of
Onion Creek
Upper Columbia River
southern tip of island
northwest of Onion
Creek
Upper Columbia River
southern tip of island
south of Squaw Creek
Upper Columbia River
north of Fivemile Creek
Upper Columbia River
on beach at Northport
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2"
o-r
0-2'
0- 1"
0-5'
o-r
0 - 0 25 '
0-2"
0-2'
0-3"
0-4"
0-2"
0-3"
0-2"
0-2"
0-4"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking t
01214116
01214118
01214120
01214122
01214124
01214128
01214128
01214130
01214132
01214134
01214136
01214138
01214140
01214142
01214144
01224150
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0915
MJ0916
MJ0917
MJ0818
MJ0919
MJ0921
MJ0920
MJ0922
MJ0923
MJ0924
MJ0925
MJ0926
MJ0927
MJ0928
MJ0929
MJ0930
Organic CLP
«
JX458
JX459
JX460
JX461
JX462
JX464
JX463
JX46S
JX466
JX467
JX468
JX469
JX470
JX471
JX472
JX473
Internal
Samrte ID
CR-030-SD
CR-031-SD
CR-032-SD
CR-033-SD
CR-034-SD
CR-036-SD
CR-035-SD
CR-O37-SD
CR-038-SO
CR-039-SD
CR-040-SD
CR-041-SD
CR-042-SD
CR-043-SD
CR-044-SD
CR-045-SD
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
voc
svoc
TOG
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sample
Date
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
31-May-01
Sample
Time
1545
1645
1800
1000
1100
1400
1200
1500
1630
1015
X' 113°
1245-'
1330
1400
1515
1045
OI-0331rxlsTable 1-2
Page 3 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Tiblt 1-2—Sampl* Analytical RcqulrwnanU
Station ID
CS045
CSQ46
CS047
CS048
CS049
CS050
TS001
TS002
TS003
TS004
TS005
TS006
TS007
TS008
TS009
TS010
Station Description
Upper Columbia River
north oi Big Sheep
Creek
Upper Columbia River
south ol Steamboat
Rock
Upper Columbia River
northeast of Steamboat
Rock
Upper Columbia River
north of Goodeve Creek
Upper Columbia River
on point bar southwest
of Scnver Creek
Upper Columbia River
south of Tom Bush
Creek
Upper Columbia River
at 'Black Sand Beach"
Upper Columbia River
on boulder bar near
border
Unnamed. T32N R37E.
Section 8
Unnamed, Clover Leaf
Beach Campground
Unnamed, T32N R37E.
Section 8 (northern
tributary)
Stranger Creek (west)
Hall Creek
Cobbs Creek
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 28
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E. Section 30
unproposed sampling
location
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 21
(below media
surface)
0-3'
0- 1"
o-r
0-3"
0-2"
0-2"
0-3"
0-2"
0-0.5"
0-3"
0-3'
0-2"
0-2"
0-4"
o-r
0-3"
0-3"
Tracklno •
01224151
01224154
01224155
01224157
01224160
01224162
' 01224163
01224164
01234079
01234080
01234053
01234081
01234052
01234082
01234054
01234083
01234055
01234058
CLP#
MJOB31
MJ0932
MJ0933
MJ0834
MJ0935
MJ0936
MJ0937
MJ0938
MJOBJ4
MJOBJ5
MJ09E4
MJOBJ6
MJ09E6
MJOBJ7
MJ09E5
MJOBJ8
MJ09E8
MJ09E7
OrganteCU»
*
JX474
JX475
JX476
JX477
JX478
JX479
JX480
JX481
JX570
JX558
JX558
Internal
Samole ID
CR-046-SD
CR-047-SD
CR-048-SO
CR-049-SD
CR-050-SD
CR-051-SD
CR-052-SD
CR-053-SD
TR-056-SO
TR-057-80
TR-058-SD
TR-059-SD
TR-081-SD
TR-062-SD
rooeo-SD
TR-084-SO
TR-063-SD
TR-065-SO
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
voc
•— II
svoc
^•••••^HHWKHHMH,^
i
^^•••^nWH^HMW.
•roc
X
X
_
i i
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
Sample
31-May-Ol
31-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
01-Jun-01
Ol-Jun-01
Ol-Jun-01
Ol-Jun-01
OS-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
OS-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
Sample
1215
1430
1515
1630
930
1145
1230
1415
1000
1045
1500
1145
1315
1245
1430
1400
1645
1550
Ol-0331rxlsTablcl-2
Page 4 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requlrementa
SK lion ID
TS011
TS012
TS013
TS014
TS015
TS016
TS017
TS018
IS0 19
TS020
TS021
TS022
TS023
TS024
TS025
TS026
TS027
TS028
TS029
TS030
TS031
TS032
Station Description
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E. Section 19
Unnamed. T33N,
R37E, Section 18
Magee Creek
Jennings Creek
Little Jim Creek
Unnamed, T33N R36E,
Section 1
Unnamed, T33N R37E,
Section 4
Unnamed, T33N R37E,
Section 5
Unnamed. T34N R37E,
Section 32
Unnamed, T34N R36E,
Section 36
Unnamed, T34N R36E,
Section 25
Cheweka Creek
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 29
(north of Cheweka
Creek)
Unnamed. T34N,
R37E, Section 29 (NW
Qtr)
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 20
Barnaby Creek
Rotter Bay Creek
Quillisascut Creek
Unnamed, T34N,
R36E, Section 1 1
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 6
Cuba Canyon Creek
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 31
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2"
0-3'
0-4*
0-3'
0-2"
o-r
o-r
o-r
0-2"
0-25-
0-15'
0-2'
0-15'
0-3'
0-5'
0-2'
0-3'
0-2'
o-r
0-1.5-
0-8-
0-2-
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking t
01234084
01234051
01234056
01234057
01234050
01234O96
01234097
01234098
01234085
01234059
01234060
01234099
01234100
01234101
01234102
01234061
01234064
01234086
01234062
01234087
01234103
01234112
Inorganic
CLP#
MJOBJ9
MJ09FO
MJ09E9
MJ09F1
MJ09F2
MJOBK8
MJOBK9
MJOBLO
MJ09F3
MJ09F4
MJ09F5
MJOBL1
MJOBL2
MJOBL3
MJOBL4
MJ09F6
MJ09F7
MJ09F8
MJ09F9
MJ09QO
MJOBL5
MJOBM4
Organic CLP
t
JX571
JX572
Internal
Sample ID
TR-066-SD
TR-088-SO
TR-087-SD
TR-069-SD
TR-070-SD
TR-071-SD
TR-072-SD
TR-073-SD
TR-O74-SD
TR-075-SO
TR-076-SD
TR-077-SD
TR-078-SD
TR-079-SD
TR-080-SD
TR-081-SD
TR-082-SC
TR-083-SC
TR-084-SD
TR-085-SD
TR-086-SC
TR-087-80
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
voc
-
svcx;
TOC
X
X
Sample
Date
05-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-O!
03-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
03-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
07-Jun-02
Sample
Time
1445
1045
1245
1400
935
1545
1630
945
1030
1030
1100
1100
1215
1300
1330
1300
1200
1415
1345
1515
1600
915
01-033 Irxls Table 1-2
PageS of 11
12/17/01
-------
Tab!* 1-2—Sample Analytical Raqulramanta
Slalion ID
TS034
TS035
TS036
TS037
TS038
TS039
TS040
TS041
TS042
TS043
TS044
TS045
TS049
TS051
TS052
Station Description
La Reur Creek
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 32
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 33
(southwest qtr), drains
Nettleton Lake
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 33
(northwest qtr)
unproposed sampling
location
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 22
(south of Bradbury
campground)
Martin Creek
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 15
(north of Bradbury
campground)
Roper Creek
Rickey Creek
Cougar Canyon Creek
Hallam Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary west of Mingo
Creek
Mingo Creek
Colville River
Sherman Creek
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 22, SE
qtr
Unmapped tributary
adjacent to TS051
R37E, Section 22, NE
qtr
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 15, SE
qtr, western trib
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2"
0-3"
0-4"
0-6'
0-4"
0-3"
0- 2"
0-3"
0-2"
0-1"
0-4"
0. 4"
0-7"
" o-2"
0-2'
0-3'
0-3"
0-4"
Regional
01234063
01234113
01234128
01234129
01234067
01234068
myMUd
01234071
01234115
01234118
01234072
ni904inA
01234075
01234076
01234077
01234073
01234117
01234136
' 01234118
01234104
Sample Identification
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ09Q1
MJOBM5
MJOBK8
MJOBK9
MJ09Q2
MJ09Q3
MJ09Q6
MJOBM7
MJOBM8
MJ09Q7
MJ09HO
MJOBJ1
MJOBJ2
MJ09Q8
MJOBM9
MJOBJ4
I MJOBNO
MJOBL6
OipardoCLP
t
JX793
JX560
**A3f3
JX564
JX585
JX566
JX562
Internal
Sample ID
TR-088-SD
TR-088-SD
TH-128-SD
TR-129-8D
TR-090-SD
TR-091-SD
TR-093-SD
TR-094-SD
TR-09S-SD
TR-098-SD
TR-097-SD
TR-105-SD
TR-108-SD
TR-107-SD
TR-098-SD
TR-099-SD
"TR-125-SD
TR-100-8O
TR-101-8O
— —^— — ^-^^i
TAL Metals
X'
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F*est/PCB
' i limn
X
" —
X
•«,— ^ w«M_
X
X
X
x
Analyses
,VOC
• '•••• •
'
•••— ^
••MMIHHMIM^^^^^K
«mHWHB«l^^^^_
MHHHHIIMMh^^^^.H
<^nmm^mmmm
>HH|W»^H^«H««HWIH
svcx;
•™™—^i^N— •««»•«,
"•" • »„•
-
•
11 • mi,
""""""^^^w™"™*-....
""""""•"^^••••^••i—
•• -
""""""^^^^"•"•••ii™
•"""I • 1 •
•" in—
mm**^m~-**ti**iimmim
^mmmmm^m^
TOC
^B^^__^BH»^^^^
—
X
<-' -• • 1
X
1 !••••. ,
•^^•*" II
••'MBMM^^—...
X
X
1 X 1
L x i
— -^-i^—
Sample
Dale
03-Jun-Ol
07-Jun-01
09-Jun-01
09-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
07-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
07-Jun-Ol'
07-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
p4-Jun-p1
04-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
07-Jun-01
09-Jun-01
07%Jun-01
07-Jun-01
^^•HMMHMH
Sample
Time
1450
1000
1500"
1530
930
1030
1030^
1200
1130
1300
1015
1500
1830
1105
1645
1730
1600
1500
OI-0331rxlsTable 1-2
Page 6 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirements
Station ID
TS053
TS054
TS055
TS056
TS057
TS058
TS059
TS060
TS061
TS062
TS063
TS064
TS065
TS066
TS067
TS068
Station Description
Unnamed. T36N,
R37E. Section 15, SE
qtr, eastern tnb
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 14, SW
qtr
Unnamed, ephemeral
tributary, T36N, R38E,
Section IS^SWqtr
Martin Spring Creek
Pmgston Creek
Nancy Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R37E, Section 33
Unnamed tributary
T37N, R37E, Section
1 6, southwest qtr
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R37E, Section 22
Unnamed, across from
Marcus Island T37N,
R37E, Section 23
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R38E, Section 28
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R38E, Section 22 (SW
atr)
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R38E, Section 22 (NW
atrt
Unnamed, spring
drainage east of Evans
Campground peninsula
Deadman Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary, T37N, R37E,
Section 16, northwest
qtr
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2'
0-2'
o- r
0- 1.5'
0-3*
0-4'
0-5"
o-r
0-3"
0-7'
0-4"
0-35"
o-r
0-1.5"
0-2'
o-r
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracklno *
01234119
01234120
01234078
01234107
01234108
01234109
01234121
01234065
01234110
01234111
01234123
01234127
01234125
01234126
01234066
01234088
Inorganic
CLP#
MJOBN1
MJOBN2
MJOBJ3
MJOBL9
MJOBMO
MJOBM1
MJOBJ1
MJ09F8
MJOBM2
MJOBM3
MJOBK3
MJOBK7
MJOBK5
MJ08K6
MJ09QO
MJOBKO
Organic OP
t
JX574
JX791
JX803
JX807
JX805
JX587
Internal
Sample ID
TR-102-SD
TR-103-SD
TR-108-SD
TR-109-SD
TR-110-SD
TR-111-SD
TR-112-SD
TR-113-SO
TR-123-SD
TR-124-SD
TR-126-SD
TR-037-SD
TR-038-SO
TR-039-SD
TR-114-SD
TR-116-SD
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
VOC
svoc
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sample
Date
07-Jun-01
07-Jun-01
04-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
09-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
06-Jun-01
Sample
Time
1430
1400
1300
t645
1600
1400
1645
900
1245
1130
1615
1120
1130
1245
1345
1030
Ol-0331rxls Table 1-2
Page 7 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-*—Sample Analytical Requirements
Station ID
TS069
TS071
TS072
TS073
TS078
TS079
TS080
TS081
TS082
TS083
Station Description
Unnamed tributary to
Kettle River Arm,
draining pond near
Boyds
tributary, T37N, R37E,
Section 9, NW qtr, SE
qtr
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary, T37N, R37E,
Section 9, NW qtr, NE
qtr
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary. T37N, R38E,
Section 4, NE qtr
Matsen Creek
Doyle Creek
Unnamed tributary
south of Snag Cove
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T38N,
R37E, Section 36 (SW
Qtr)
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary entering river
at T38N, R37E.Section
35 (NE qtr)
Unnamed tributary
directly across from
Bossburg, WA
Dilly Lake ephemeral
tributary
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary upstream of
Dilly Lake ephemeral
tributary
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T38N,
R38E, Section 21
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-3'
0-2'
0-3"
0-3'
o- r
o-r
0-1'
o-r
0-1"
0-2'
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking t
01234092
01234090
01234091
01234093
01214103
01214105
01214107
01214109
01214111
01214113
01214115
Inorganic
CLP#
MJOBK4
MJOBK2
MJOBK3
MJOBK5
MJOBK7
MJ0952
MJ0954
MJ0955
MJ0956
MJ0957
MJ0958
MJ0959
Oro*nioCXP
•
JX568
JX569
Internal
Sarnie ID
TR-1 10-80
TR-1 16-80
TR-1 17-80
TR-118-SD
TR-120-SD
TR-121-8D
TR-001-SD
TR-002-SD
TR-005-SD
TR-004-SD
TR-O06-SD
TR-007-SO
TR-OOfrSD
TR-009-SD
Analyses"^™1""1"""
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PesVPCB
X
X
VOC
I»««MMI«_-M_«
svoc
•-
-1
TOG
— • .11.1111.
1 i __
X
x
Sample
rjftto
05-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
05-Jun-01
05-Jun-O'
05-Jun-01
21-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
23-May-01
Sample
1320
1530
1600
. 1430
1045
1345
1455
1550
1705
1735
1100
01 -033 Irxls Table 1-2
Page 8 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Tab!* 1-2—Sampl* Analytical Raqulrwncnta
Station ID
TS084
TS085
TS086
TS087
TS088
TS089
TS090
TS091
TS092
TS093
TS094
TS095
TS096
TS097
TS098
TS099
TS100
TS101
Station Description
Unnamed ephemeral
nbutary at T38N,
R38E, Section 22
Unnamed ephemeral
nbutary at North Gorge
Campground
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T38N,
R38E,Section 17(NW
qtr)
Unnamed ephemeral
nbutary downstream of
Lodgepole Cr at T38N,
R38E,Section 8 (NW
qtr)
Lodgepole Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T38N.
R38E, Section 10
Fitteenmile Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at Flat Creek
Flat Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary downstream of
China Bar
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary at T39N,
R39E, Section 25 (SW
qtr)
Crown Creek
Rattlesnake Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary downstream
from Moses Spring
Creek
Moses Spring Creek
Onion Creek
Unnamed ephemeral
tributary In T39N,
R39E. Section 10
Squaw Creek
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2"
0-.5-
missing sample
log
o-r
o-r
0-2"
0-3-
0-6"
o-r
0-2"
0-3"
0-2"
0-5"
0-3"
0-3"
0-4"
0-1.5"
0-4"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking *
01214117
01214119
01214121
01214123
01214125
01214129
01234137
01234143
01234138
01214127
01214131
01214133
01234139
01214135
01214137
01234140
01214139
01234141
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0960
MJ0961
MJ0962
MJ0963
MJ0964
MJ0968
MJOBJ5
MJOBJ2
MJOBJ6
MJ0967
MJ0969
MJ0970
MJOBJ7
MJ0971
MJ0972
MJOBJ8
MJ0973
MJOBJ9
Organic CIP
0
JX795
JX796
JX797
JX798
JX799
Internal
Sample ID
TR-010-SD
TR-011-SD
TR-012-SD
TR-013-SD
TR-014-SD
TR-016-SD
TR-040-SD
TR-127-SD
TR-041-SD
TR-017-SD
TR-018-SD
TR-019-SD
TR-042-SD
TR-020-SD
TR-022-SD
TR-043-SD
TR-023-8O
TR-044-80
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
voc
svoc
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
Sample
Date
23-May-01
23-May-Ol
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
08-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
08-Jun-01
24-May-OJ
24-May-01
24-May-01
08-Jun-01
24-May-01
24-May-01
08-Jun-01
24-May-01
09-Jun-01
Sample
Time
1220
1410
1445
1555
1640
1645
1645
1545
1500
1215
1300
1345
1145
1615
1530
1300
1435
1030
01-0331 rxls Table 1-2
Page 9 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirement*
Station ID
TS102
TS103
TS104
TS105
TS106
TS107
TS108
TS109
TS110
US001
US002
US003
US004
US005
US006
US007
US008
US009
US010
US011
US012
US013
US014
Station Description
Unnamed tributary Irom
earshore ponds
:ivemile Creek
Bear Creek
Deep Creek
Big Sheep Creek
Quartz Creek
Goodeve Creek
Scnver Creek
Unnamed tributary NE
of Gaging Station
Tributary to Tom Bush
Creek, Melrose Mine
Flume Creek; Sullivan
s^me
Flume Creek South
Fork
Lmton Creek, Oriole
Mine
Unnamed tributary to
Onion Creek, Van
Stone Mine
Unnamed tributary to
Onion Creek; Van
Stone Mine
Van Stone Mine soil
Van Stone Mine soil
Van Stone Mine soil
Unnamed tributary to
Onion Creek; Van
Stone Mine
Tributary to Deep
Creek, Last Chance
Mine
Deep Creek South Fork
Unnamed tributary to
Deep Creek
Unnamed tributary to
Hunters Creek,
Cleveland Mine
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0- 1"
0-3"
0-2"
0-4"
0-2"
0-4"
0-45"
0-3"
0-8"
0-3"
0-2"
0-4"
0-2*
0-3"
0-3"
0-4"
0-6*
0-8"
0-4"
0-10"
0-4"
0-3"
Sample Identification
Regional
Tracking!
01214141
01214143
01234142
01234122
01224153
01 2241 52
01224156
01224161
01224185
01264088
01284070
01264073
01264075
01264050
01264051
01264054
01264055
01264053
01264059
01264062
01264058
01264065
Inorganic
CLP#
MJ0974
MJQ975
MJOBKO
MJOBK2
MJ0976
M40977
MJ0978
MJ0979
MJ0880
MJOBQ1
MJOBQ3
MJOBQ5
MJOBQ7
MJOBN3
MJOBN4
MJOBN7
MJOBN8
MJOBN6
MJOBP2
MJOBP5
MJOBP1
MJOBP8
OrparicCLP
*
JX800
JX802
JX552
JX553
JX554
JX555
JX827
JXS28
JX831
JX832
JX810
JX811
JX814
JX815
JX813
JX819
JX822
JX82flT~
JX618
JX825
Internal
Samite ID
7R-024-SD
TR-025-SD
TR-045-8D
TR-047-SD
TR-026-SD
TR-027-SD
TR028-SD
TO029-SD
TR-030-SD
BK-150-SD
BK-162-SD
BK-153-SD
BK-155-SD
BK-130-SD
BK-131-SD
BK-134-SD
BK-135-SO
BK-133-SD
BK-139-SD
BK-142-SD
BK-140-SD
BK-138-SD
TB-147-SO
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1 _
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Eest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VCX3
svoc
X
X
X
TOC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
_
X
Sample
Date
24-May-Ol
24-May-Ot
)9-Jun-01
38-Jun-01
31-May-Ol
3l-May-01
31-May-Ol
31-Jun-01
01-Jun-Ol
27-Jun-Ot
28-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
26-Jun-O"
27-Jun-01
Sample
Time
1325
1145
930
1000
1345
1300
1545
1100
1330
900
930
1045
1300
945
1315
1445
1500
1300
1215
1615
1000
1630
01-033IrxlsTable 1-2
Page 10 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-2—Sample Analytical Requirements
Station ID
US015
US016
UW001
UW002
UW003
UW004
UW005
UW006
UW007
RW001
RS001
RS002
RS003
RS004
TB001
TB002
Station Description
Unnamed tributary to
Hunters Creek,
Cleveland Mine
Unnamed tributary to
Hunters Creek,
Cleveland Mine
Tributary to Tom Bush
Creek, Melrose Mine
Flume Creek-Sullivan
Mine
Flume Creek South
Fork
Unnamed tributary to
Onion Creek, Van
Stone Mine
Tributary to Deep
Creek, Last Chance
Mine
Deep Creek South Fork
Unnamed tributary to
Hunters Creek,
Cleveland Mine
Kemmerer Bottle
Bowl and Spoon
Dredge Sampler
Hand Auger
Bowl and Spoon
Grand Coulee
Grand Coulee
Sample Interval
(below media
surface)
0-2'
0-5"
0'
0'
0"
0"
0"
0'
0"
NA (rlnsate)
NA (rinsate)
NA (rinsate)
NA (rinsate)
NA (rinsate)
NAJtrip blankL
NA (trip blank)
Sample Identification
Regional
Traekina *
01264072
01264066
01264069
01264067
01264074
01264052
01264063
01264061
01264066
01204103
01224158
01224159
01234135
01264071
01204108
01204109
Inorganic
CLP#
MJOBQ8
MJOBN9
MJOBQ2
MJOBQO
MJOBQ6
MJOBN5
MJOBP6
MJOBP4
MJOBP9
MJ08Y5
MJ0981
MJ0982
MJOBJ3
MJOBQ4
Organic CLP
t
JX833
JX816
JX428
JX556
JX557
JX792
JX830
JX547
JX549
Internal
Sample ID
TR-145-SO
TR-136-SD
BK-151-SW
BK-149-SW
BK-154-SW
BK-132-SW
BK-143-SW
BK-141-SW
TR-148-SW
RS-001-SW
RS-001-SD
RS-002-SD
RS-003-SD
R-004-SD
TB-001-SW
TB-002-SW
Analyses
TAL Metals
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pest/PCB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
voc
X
X
X
svoc
X
TOC
X
X
Sample
Date
27-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
15-May-0"1
31-May-01
31-May-01
08-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
14-May-01
14-May-01
Sample
Time
1515
1430
930
945
1055
1345
1600
1245
1645
1120
830
900
800
700
11 45
1000
Noles
CLP Contract Laboratory Program
NA Not applicable
Pesl/PCB Chlorinated pesticides and polychlonnated bipnenyls
SVOC Semivolalile organic compound
TAL Metals Target analyla list metals
TOC Total organic carbon
VOC Volatile organic compound
01-033 Irxls Table 1-2
Page 11 of 11
12/17/01
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
Table 1-3—Sample QA/QC Analysis Summary
Laboratory
Field Analysis
EPA Region 10
or CLP
Laboratory
Commercial
Laboratory
EPA Region 10
or CLP
Laboratory
Matrix
Soil/
Sediment
Soil/
Sediment
Soil/
Sediment
Water
Parameters/Method
Pb, Cu. Zn by XRF
EPA 6200
TAL Metals/
(CLPAS) ILM04 1
Pesticides/PCBs
(CLPAS) OLM04.2
SVOC
TOC
EPA SW-846 9060M
Pesticides/PCBs
(CLPAS) OLM04 2
VOCs
SVOCs
TAL Metals/
(CLPAS) ILM04.1
Total Field
Samples
NA
179
100
3
97
2
2
2
9
QA/QC Sample Summary Analyses
Organic
MS/MSD
NA
NA
8
1
9
1
1
1
NA
Inorganic
MS/MSD
NA
9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
Rinsate
Blanks
NA
4
4
0
NA
1
1
1
1
Trip
Blanks
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2
NA
NA
Total Field and
QA/QC
Analyses
NA
192
112
4
106
4
6
4
11
Notes:
CLP. Contract Laboratory Program
CLPAS. Contract-Laboratory Program Analytical Service
OLM
ILM
MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
NA- Not Applicable
PCBs Polychlonnated Biphenyls
Pesticides. Chlorinated Pesticides
QA Quality Assurance
QC Quality Control
SVOCs Semivolatile Organic Compounds
TAL- Target Analyte List
TOC. Total Organic Carbon
VOCs. Volatile Organic Compounds
Ol-033ladoc
Page 1 of 1
15 November 200!
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
APPENDIX H
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM COORDINATES
-------
Station
ID
CW001
CW002
CS001
CS002
CS003
CS004
| CS005
CS006
CS007
CS008
CS009
CS010
CS011
CS012
>
Station
Description
Grand Coulee
Drinking Water
System
distribution
Lake Roosevelt
Grand Coulee
Dnnking Water
Intake
Lake Roosevelt
Crescent Bay
boat ramp
Lake Roosevelt
North Dam Boat
Ramp
Lake Roosevelt
Plum Point
Lake Roosevelt
near Inchelium
Lake Roosevelt
at point south of
Hall Creek
Lake Roosevelt
at Mission Point
Lake Roosevelt
north of Daisy
Station
Lake Roosevelt
south of
Cheweka Creek
Lake Roosevelt
south of Chalk
Grade Point
Lake Roosevelt
south of Barnaby
Island
Lake Roosevelt
on flats north of
Quilhsascut
Creek
Lake Roosevelt
on flats north of
Quilhsascut
Creek
Data File
q051422a
q051519a
q051501a
q051502a
q051520b
M051717a
M051717b
M051718b
M051719a
M051720a
M051723a
M051722a
M051723b
M051817a
GPS Date
14-May-01
15-May-01
14-May-01
14-May-01
15-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
17-May-01
8-May-01
GPS
Time
15:12:32
12:12:24
18:19:34
19:05:58
13:23:03
10:12:53
11:08:06
11:29:56
12:17:01
13:56:37
16:07:17
15:46:08
16.35:23
10:11-39
Longitude
-118.99610886
-118.96799217
-118.98623543
-118.96423424
-118.86615068
-118.17252426
-118.17635539
-118.18676555
-118.17905349
-118.18347358
-118.19309538
-118.2135052
-118.20449056
-118.20277675
Latitude
47.93332505
47.9419154
47.94759778
47.94736508
47.95086836
48.30055232
48.30913076
48.36033147
48.37980781
48.41597662
48.43027213
48.44196518
48.45583243
48.46142995
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
-------
1
Station
ID
=^=^=
CS013
I CS014
CS015
CS016
CS017
CS018
CS019
CS020
CS021
CS022
CS023
CS024
Station
Description
Lake Roosevelt
on flats between
French Point
Rocks and La
Fleur Creek
Lake Roosevelt
on mid-channel
bar east of
French Point
Rocks
Lake Roosevelt
north of French
Point
Lake Roosevelt
on flats North of
Bradbury Beach
Lake Roosevelt
on flats fronting
Haag Cove
Lake Roosevelt
on flats south of
Colville River
Lake Roosevelt
Lake Roosevelt
south of Boise
Cascade Log
Boom
_ake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats,
northwest of
Martin Spring
Creek
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats,
southwest of
Pmgston Creek
_ake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats
(west bank)
Marcus Flats,
north of Pmgston
Creek
Data File
M051818a
M051819a
M051820a
1051821 a
t051822a
t051916a
t051917a
t051918a
m052117a
m052117b
m052118a
Q060816a
GPS Date
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
18-May-01
19-May-01
19-May-01
19-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
8-Jun-01
GPS
Time
11:07:27
12:20:57
13:20:07
14:25:17
15:31:34
09:05:38
10:23:50
11:17:13
10:18:33
10:54:01
11:55:11
09:38:56
Longitude
-118.19430024
-118.17004536
-118.18602119
s
-118.14655292
-118.1444874
-118.12093579
-118.11732646
-118.12327834
-118.08657537
-118.08513455
118.10837503
118.08516557
Latitude
48.48882027
48.49718576
48.50445393
48.51941734
48.55427273
48.56666331
48.57692281
48.60848159
48.63306761
48.6386791
48.65239937
48.65257778
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
-------
Station
ID
—
CS025
CS026
CS027
CS028
CS029
CS030
CS031
CS032
CS033
CS034
CS035
CS036
CS037
Station
Description
Lake Roosevelt
on Marcus Flats
west of Pingston
Creek
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats,
south of Marcus
Island
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats,
east of Kamloops
Lake Roosevelt,
Marcus Flats
northeast
Lake Roosevelt
north of Summer
Island
Lake Roosevelt
on flats at Evans
Campground
Lake Roosevelt
east of Snag
Cove
Lake Roosevelt
on flats south of
Bossburg
Lake Roosevelt
on flats north of
Bossburq
Lake Roosevelt
on flats south of
North Gorge
east bank)
Lake Roosevelt
on flats south of
North Gorge
west bank)
_ake Roosevelt
east of Flat Creek
north bank)
Lake Roosevelt
at China Bar
Data File
m052119a
m052120d
m052120c
m052121b
m052122a
m052123a
m052200b
m052217a
m052217b
m052220a
m052218a
m052222a1
m052223a
GPS Date
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
21-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
2-May-01
2-May-01
GPS
Time
12:28:33
13:51:47
13:24:12
14:32:36
15:51:59
16:36:06
17:43:31
10:02:08
0:54:37
3:57:37
1:51:02
5:10:53
6.36.40
Longitude
-118.09188759
-118.08823714
-118.10057102
-118.08490619
-118.03244671
-118.02333361
-118.04915581
-118.05368666
-118.04684768
-118.00701706
-118.01351494
-117.978723
117.92591543
Latitude
48.65340326
48.66118525
48.66951163
48.67947102
48.69400597
48.69649822
48.73141971
48.75086841
48.758648
48.78642347
48.79179918
48.82050073
48.82824855
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
-------
Station
ID
CS038
CS039
CS040
CS041
CS042
CS043
CS044
CS045
CS046
CS047
CS048
CS049
Station
Description
Lake Roosevelt
near navigation
light south of
Crown Creek
Lake Roosevelt
north of
Rattlesnake
Creek (east bank)
Lake Roosevelt
north of Onion
Creek
Jpper Columbia
River southern tip
of island
northwest of
Onion Creek
Upper Columbia
River southern tip
of island south of
Squaw Creek
Upper Columbia
River north of
:ivemile Creek
Upper Columbia
River on beach at
Northport
Upper Columbia
River north of Big
Sheep Creek
Upper Columbia
River south of
Steamboat Rock
Upper Columbia
tfver northeast of
Steamboat Rock
Upper Columbia
River north of
Goodeve Creek
Upper Columbia
)iver on point bar
southwest of
Scnver Creek
Data File
m052317a
m052318a
m052319a
m052320a
m052321a
m052322a
M053117a
M053119a
m053121a
M053122a
M053123a
M060117a
GPS Date
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
1-Jun-01
GPS
Time
10:46:47
11:36:52
12:41:11
13:26:19
14:20:34
15:19:42
10:36:08
12:19:22
NA
5:17:03
6:15:58
0:08:40
Longitude
-117.9266419
-117.87875634
-117.84625343
-117.84687866
-117.835167
-117.79750404
-117.77216319
-117.7613159
1-1 * 7.75325833
:^>JC%^4',Sf;ri
;> ;'';"" t" i''", ' ','+'""''&
-117.7415272
-117.73233422
-117.72070544
Latitude
48.83728583
48.8661392
48.87497229
48.87851059
48.88751 909
48.9143281
48.92262736
48.93831373
48.93650^7778
it ;•' * '- '-,- '
. ' - * ••
48.93783955
48.94028916
48.94212391
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
10 feet SE
-------
Station
ID
' , „ |
CS050
CS051
CS052
TS001
TS002
TS003
TS004
TS005
TS006
TS007
TS008
TS009
TS010
TS011
TS012
TS013
TS014
TS015
TS016
•rrsoi?
Station
Description
Upper Columbia
River south of
Tom Bush Creek
Upper Columbia
River at "Black
Sand Beach"
Upper Columbia
River on boulder
bar near border
Unnamed, T32N
R37E, Section 8
Unnamed, Clover
Leaf Beach
Campground
Unnamed, T32N
R37E, Section 8
(northern
tributary)
Stranger Creek
(west)
Hall Creek
Cobbs Creek
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 28
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 30
unproposed
sampling location
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 21
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 19
Unnamed, T33N,
R37E, Section 1 8
Magee Creek
Jennings Creek
Little Jim Creek
Unnamed, T33N
R36E, Section 1
Unnamed, T33N
R37E, Section 4
Data File
M060118A
M060119A
M060121A
m060517a
m060517b
t060322a
m060518a
t060320a
m060520a
1060421 c
m060521a
t060500a
t060422a
m060522b
t060317b
106041 9a
1060421 a
106031 7a
m060522c
m060523a
GPS Date
1-Jun-01
1-Jun-01
1-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
GPS
Time
NA
NA
NA
10:16:03
10:57:19
15:22:06
11:49:08
13:39:51
13:15:41
14:48:15
14:01:41
17:07:37
15:41:57
5:05:27
0:52:39
2:46.57
4:10.01
0.09.21
5.46:41
6.32-58
Longitude
;-1.17.66189J67
ij" ,£ * \^v ![ ," * J^rp1
llff^^fSii;!
Y •« •, ;r>'Vi""r^f
^1!i7;647925^
^u/VsJd^rt.' r^^jJi-Wf..*
^trt.'«'\}t-3»'«-l *7$?€'^
Eja^x-^'PlL
3,^63^42222
.,;>«; •'<•«!., a >,w, f"; «•// «
i^VVl^^-fth^C"^
-118.16438774
-118.14565112
-118.17297572
-118.18297642
-118.20323074
-118.18859712
-118.15137802
-118.19069809
-118.15598623
-118.15741696
-118.19292
-118.19385202
-118 16258061
-118.16385295
118.19318967
118.19924238
118.17116956
Latitude
48;916629,44444
kM&T#9?*S&.}.
^;,™ ij«v¥ tjf&iejjffii V&X
,'|U;«.;fc:rtefJ.v»;ar,»>jOT!
SSrtit«t'a!Si4K,'"8S'a'i!.l(
|8^eg||i
jf.r.^lllMfe^l'l
.^•V^*^'i^
,W3J'9|f§IM6|l
v— l- .flS'SiSMxtrji^enpftft
•(^j;;^'|;l|fp
48.28845408
48.29717002
48.29296774
48.29285846
48.30413505
48.31719259
48.32425419
48.33331945
48.33447263
48.33935713
48.34340185
48.35956205
48.36059685
48.36554478
48.3681474
48 38629585
48.38987494
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
300 feet W
100feetW
20 E
210 feet
upstream
20 feet SW
300 feet
upstream
20 feet E
-------
1
Station
ID
====:
TS018
TS019
TS020
TS021
TS022
TS023
TS024
TS025
TS026
TS027
TS028
TS029
TS030
TS031
Station
Description
Unnamed, T33N
R37E, Section 5
Unnamed, T34N
R37E, Section 32
Unnamed, T34N
R36E, Section 36
Unnamed, T34N
R36E, Section 25
Cheweka Creek
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 29
north of
Cheweka Creek)
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 29
(NW qtr)
Jnnamed, T34N,
R37E, Section 20
Barnaby Creek
Rotter Bay Creek
Quillisascut
Creek
Unnamed, T34N,
R36E, Section 1 1
Unnamed, T34N,
R37E. Section 6
Cuba Canyon
Creek
Data File
m060616b
m060617a
m060317a
m06031 9a
m060618a
m060619a
m060619b
m060620a
m060320a
t060418a
m060621a
m060321a
m060622a
m060622b
GPS Date
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
GPS
Time
09:51:13
10:12:53
10:26:27
12:17:17
11:38:20
12:19:30
12:57:55
13:30:14
13:05:40
1:50:25
14:49:28
4:17:36
5:13:26
5:50:23
Longitude
-118.17220931
-118.17428199
-118.21456777
-118.21397201
-118.18047933
-118.1810255
-118.18258081
-118.18713713
-118.22217327
-118.18818647
-118.19501414
-118.22064723
-118.19335082
-118.20795771
Latitude
48.39352615
48.39556317
48.40914227
48.41797662
48.41838184
48.4191279
48.42289413
48.43054423
48.4336522
48.44430514
48.4519532
48.45808083
48.4678232
48.47924134
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
34 feetW,
30 feetN
130 feet
upstream
6 feet E
30 feet W
-------
1
II Station
|| ID
TS032
TS033
TS034
TS035
TS036
TS037
TS038
l
TS039
TS040
TS041
TS042
TS043
TS044
TS045
TS046
TS047
TS048
TS049
k
Station
Description
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 31
La Fleur Creek
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 32
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section 33
(southwest qtr);
drains Nettleton
Lake
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 33
(northwest qtr)
Unproposed
sampling location
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 22
(south of
Bradbury
campground)
Martin Creek
Unnamed, T35N,
R37E, Section 15
(north of
Bradbury
campground)
Roper Creek
Rickey Creek
Cougar Canyon
Creek
Hallam Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary west of
^ingo Creek
Mingo Creek
Colville River
Sherman Creek
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section
22, SE qtr
Data File
m060716a
m060322a
m060717a
m060922a
m060922b
106041 6a
t060417a
m060718a
m060719a
m060718b
m060720a
m060417a
t060622a
m060501b
m060501a
m060500a
m060418a
m060800a
GPS Date
7-Jun-01
3-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
9-Jun-01
9-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
GPS
Time
09:17.54
15:03:37
10:10:49
15:04:17
15:57:20
09:54:36
10:30:01
11:11:09
12:38:56
11:41:47
13:06:51
10:18:45
15:11:35
18:42:01
18:00:23
17:28-04
1 1 -40-00
17:16:01
Longitude
-118.20955747
-118.20722707
-118.16963206
-118.16489287
-118.16237102
-118.15179622
-118.14848597
-118.18437434
-118.13670448
-118.17069762
-118.13595896
-118.15453807
-118.12376311
-118.08140433
-118.07941283
-118.07636583
-118.1394913
-118.13629622
Latitude
48.48460456
48.48854853
48.48597205
48.48984614
48.49207338
48.51021109
48.51319364
48.52104276
48.52695478
48.54066585
48.53985776
48.5591544
48.55857879
48.57265454
48.57414722
48.57566028
48.58308291
48.60069248
|
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
5 feet E
30 feet E
100 feet
upstream
200 feet W
10 feet S
65 feet W
-------
Station
ID
— —
TS050
TS051
TS052
TS053
TS054
TS055
TS056
TS057
TS058
TS059
TS060
TS061
TS062
TS063
Station
Description
Unmapped
tributary adjacent
to TS051
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section
22, NE qtr
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section
15, SEqtr,
western tributary
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section
15, SE qtr,
eastern tributary
Unnamed, T36N,
R37E, Section
14, SWqtr
Unnamed,
ephemeral
tributary, T36N,
R38E, Section
Martin Spring
Creek
Pingston Creek
Nancy Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
Unnamed
tributary T37N,
R37E, Section
1 6, southwest qtr
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
Unnamed, across
from Marcus
sland T37N,
R37E, Section 23
Unnamed
ephemeral
nbutary at T37N,
Data File
m061000a
m060722b
m060722a
m060721c
m060721b
m060421a
t060700a
t060622b
1060621 a
m060923a
10606 17a
t060619a
t060618a
m060900a
GPS Date
9-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
7-Jun-01
4-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
9-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
GPS
Time
17:33:00
15:57:36
15:09:15
14:49:38
14:25:01
14:17:30
17:02:54
15:52:21
14:17:52
16:36:07
10:01:43
12:51:45
11:53:06
17:07-50
Longitude
-118.13607492
-118.1344893
-118.1336598
-118.13288015
-118.12895123
-118.07956772
-118.07826015
-118.08259481
-118.11399285
-118.11554746
-118.1163399
-118.08936076
118.07618591
118.03252902
Latitude
48.60422634
48.60572171
48.61336795
48.61328849
48.61919872
48.6153404
48.63163767
48.65214266
48.65541396
48.66880883
48.69894892
48.69034757
48.68646883
48.674347
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
200 feet
upstream
200 feet
upstream
30 feet E,
10 feet N
5 feet E
10 feet N
50 feet S
20 feet SE
-------
Station
ID
TS064
TS065
TS066
TS067
TS068
|
F TS069
TS070
TS071
TS072
TS073
TS074
|[rS075
M"S076
Station
Description
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R38E, Section 22
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T37N,
R38E, Section 22
(NW qtr)
Unnamed, spring
drainage east of
Evans
Campground
peninsula
Deadman Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary, T37N,
R37E, Section
16, northwest qtr
Unnamed
tributary to Kettle
River Arm,
draining pond
near Boyds
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary, T37N,
R37E, Section 9,
NW qtr, SE qtr
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary, T37N,
R37E, Section 9,
NW qtr, NE qtr
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary, T37N,
R38E, Section 4,
NEqtr
Matsen Creek
Doyle Creek
Kettle River
China Creek
Data File
q060818a
q06081 9a
q060819b
1060521 a
t060617b
t060520a
t060522a
t060523a
1060521 b
10605 18b
t060518a
t060517a
m052200a
GPS Date
8-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
6-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
5-Jun-01
21-May-01
GPS
Time
11:41:38
12:21:07
12:47:58
14:04:19
10:32:21
13:26:48
15:49:53
16:44:01
14:59:23
1:5909
1:28:32
0:02:21
7:18-10
Longitude
-118.01458202
-118.01511441
-118.01488625
-118.12680241
-118.11911193
-118.12882848
-118.11871181
-118.11885067
-118.11716902
-118.13178812
-118.13225922
-118.1231085
-118.03376107
Latitude
48.6910539
48.69373847
48.69618122
48.70725424
48.71083339
48.71741605
48.72085941
48.72315992
48.73722253
48.73857207
48.74096216
48.74804728
48.71413716
I
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
10 feet S
120 feet
upstream
E)
30 feet S
-------
Station
JD
TS077
TS078
TS079
TS080
TS081
TS082
TS083
TS084
TS085
TS086
Station
Description
Unnamed
tributary south of
Snag Cove
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T38N,
R37E, Section 36
(SW qtr)
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary entering
river at T38N,
R37E,Section 35
(NE qtr)
Unnamed
tributary directly
across from
Bossburg, WA
Dilly Lake
ephemeral
tributary
I Innamprt
ephemeral
tributary
upstream of Dilly
Lake ephemeral
nbutary
Unnamed
ephemeral
ributary at T38N,
R38E, Section 21
Unnamed
ephemeral
ributary at T38N,
R38E, Section 22
Unnamed
ephemeral
ributary at North
Gorge
Campground
Unnamed
ephemeral
ributary at T38N,
R38E,Section17
NW qtr)
Data File
t052218a
t052220a
1052221 a
t052223a
t052300a
tOBP^OOb
t052318a
t052319a
t052321a
t052321b
GPS Date
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-May-01
22-Mav-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
GPS
Time
11:18:25
13:50:52
14:57:23
16:09:19
17:10:43
NA
11:03:39
12:23:03
4:09:33
4:50:14
Longitude
-118.0528747
-118.06398584
-118.06352579
-118.05597784
-118.0403655
-i'iB'flftfli3BS9;
i y V if^i'l-s'i'.i '&'* '; ''f
*^,J^'=r.-',l'VV ''-I'.', :-
^•R'5i4,--,'-;: :•;>";,>
U^.U-^
-118.00884452
-118.00398041
-118.00107156
-118.01392302
Latitude
48.72516913
48.74391456
48.75206898
48.75829918
48.77095646
48"^695§4/i'iii>t/ifli
Nl.0,'/1Pl?«&ra "("ijt'Si
W ?•
•' ;/ r-~. yj$r " Ssl-^sP
"'"''' J" O!''-w!4'fii9
, ..= -i%^;r?r4
^-xliltePfti
; •> siisajfev .,h",i^s>
',
-------
Station
ID
TS087
TS088
TS089
TS090
TS091
TS092
TS093
TS094
TS095
TS096
TS097
TS098
TS099
TS100
>
PTSIOI
Station
Description
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary
downstream of
Lodgepole Cr at
Lodgepole Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T38N,
R38E, Section 1 0
Fifteenmile Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at Flat
Creek
Flat Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary
downstream of
China Bar
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary at T39N,
R39E, Section 25
(SW qtr)
Crown Creek
Rattlesnake
Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
tributary
downstream from
Moses Spring
Creek
Moses Spring
Creek
Onion Creek
Unnamed
ephemeral
nbutary in T39N,
R39E, Section 10
Squaw Creek
Data File
1052322B
1052323C
m052323a
q060823a
q060822b
q060822a
m052419a
m052420a
m052420b
m060818a
m052423a
t052422a
m060819a
105242 1b
m060917a
GPS Date
23-May-01
23-May-01
23-May-01
8-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
24-May-01
24-May-01
24-May-01
8-Jun-01
24-May-01
24-May-01
8-Jun-01
24-May-01
9-Jun-01
GPS
Time
NA
16:44:36
16:56:54
16:43:39
16:05:56
15:04:11
12:19:19
13:00:14
13:40:53
11:43:53
6-19:45
5:51:04
2-58:06
4:42.25
0:20-11
Longitude
;.;;|1;J8.0145|:4
1. kP^P-i"-' " V Vixe1
?".;i"5V!''^' f ,,4"t ;"''
'y*\lfi'""--&\C$^f;;
Iv/^llA^S-i,'
^"J***"^''''"' **?' '* ^"wM^l""
-118.01192578
-117.99423047
-117.9878564
-117.97827733
-117.9780477
-117.94096487
-117.92703145
-117.91183214
-117.90114262
-117.87309993
-117.8577589
-117.84620837
-117.84092911
1 1 7.82698843
Latitude
48.8091638889
V.v/'t^a^;?' ,,'M,.'
,^^i!&$&&j'i. '
; •?<-^if.\..xvti*,sX!_wt,
- £ j !^,,;« sStH'£&i& **&!
•"Vv'f^MW-f.5.,-,
'• V ftt-ivAsvSdJ S;}
„ i.'^i.'uifSJiiMb!;, fl--'
'. .^arjjj^figgjg-ij.ii •:>,
48.81094806
48.81178515
48.82014294
48.8223694
48.82304915
48.82060811
48.8424334
48.85459859
48.85789975
48.88062481
48.87557936
48.87318893
48.89026632
48.89546073
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
30 feet S
-------
Station
ID
TS102
TS103
TS104
TS105
TS106
TS107
TS108
TS109
TS110
US001 /
UW001
US002 /
UW002
US003/
UW002
US004
US005
US006
US007
US008
US009
US010
Station
Description
Unnamed
tributary from
nearshore ponds
Fivemile Creek
Bear Creek
Deep Creek
Big Sheep Creek
Quartz Creek
Goodeve Creek
Scnver Creek
Unnamed
tributary NE of
Gaging Station
Tributary to Tom
Bush Creek;
Meirose Mine
rlume Creek;
Sullivan Mine
rlume Creek
South Fork
Linton Creek;
Oriole Mine
Unnamed
ributary to Onion
Creek; Van Stone
Mine
Unnamed
ributary to Onion
Creek; Van Stone
Mine
Van Stone Mine
oil
Van Stone Mine
oil
Van Stone Mine
oil
Unnamed
ributary to Onion
Creek; Van Stone
Mine
Data File
t052421a
t052418a
m060916a
m060817a
M053120a
M053119b
M053122b
M060117b
M060120A
r062717b
r062817a
r062817b
r062820a
r062516a
r062521a
r062521c
r062522e
r062520a
r062519b
GPS Date
24-May-01
24-May-01
9-Jun-01
8-Jun-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
31-May-01
1-Jun-01
1-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
28-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
25-Jun-01
GPS
Time
14:06:35
11:58:44
09-45:50
10:05:07
13:36:48
12:51:31
15:51:19
10:49:00
NA
10:13:06
10:00:48
10:50:08
13:31:47
09:55:36
4:08:35
4:42:04
5:08:32
3:13:40
2:35:37
Longitude
-117.8205032
-117.79957867
-117.8114682
-117.7536441
-117.76537435
-117.76444347
-117.73418096
^ifT^SlTlil
,%xr>\i j-^g^ga-ist^asja.'.?!^,.^ •*&
£,1lJ^i¥398t944*
^fJt^^WfSW'Kf
v? £yy t* * vlr-^C r &*frw;L%*<
ift-H^i K;*e-V '^jT&j? £•
-117.64614013
-117.38501219
-117.39327514
-117.41577952
-117.79365619
-117.75384957
-117.7530733
-117.75884106
-117.74375006
-117.74363503
Latitude
48.90021192
48.8988877
48.90855778
48.93226648
48.93923694
48.93905546
48.94296884
%si9Miii
f:J$li|flfi||
&cc, ft-'tf-^r^s
48.9463303
48.90289118
48.87175394
48.85920965
48.77948285
48.75051462
48.75045504
48.75304501
48.75748945
48.75676136
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
12feetSW
6 feet N
200 feet
upstream
50 feet SE
30 feet W
-------
Station
ID
—
UW004
US01 1 /
UW005
US012/
UW006
US013
US014/
UW007
US015
US016
Station
Description
Unnamed
tributary to Onion
Creek; Van Stone
Mine
Tributary to Deep
Creek; Last
Chance Mine
Deep Creek
South Fork
Unnamed
tributary to Deep
Creek
Unnamed
tributary to
Hunters Creek;
Cleveland Mine
Unnamed
:ributary to
Hunters Creek;
Cleveland Mine
Unnamed
tributary to
Hunters Creek;
Cleveland Mine
Data File
r062520b
r062623a1
r062619a
r062617a
r062723a
r062722b
r062721a
GPS Date
25-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
26-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
27-Jun-01
GPS
Time
13:57:19
16:40:13
12:26:32
10:36:50
16:30:13
15:58:06
14:19:27
Longitude
-117.7538001
-117.68972521
-117.66672655
-117.65789432
-118.04019634
-118.0296757
-118.02697886
Latitude
48.75052196
48.86287034
48.76888098
48.6975981
48.12127929
48.11797048
48.11598579
Distance/
Direction
to Sample
Location
180 feet
150feetS
^0 DQRS^cobrdinates available, coordinates shown are uncprreqtejj.; -''..-_,
NA: Not available.
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
APPENDIX I
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW MEMORANDA AND ANALYTICAL DATA FORMS
(Available Upon Request)
-------
APPENDIX J
EPA'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO CONDUCT SAMPLING IN CANADA
-------
Department of Po/6ian Affairs ^HEfagF Mini et&redeaAff awes atfangdres
and inttrnati'onel Trade §9££$| • Bt ou Comme/ce rniernational
cw3JoA
July 23,2001
Mrs. Susan Lysyshyn
Economic and Environment,
Science and Technology Section •
Embassy of the United States of America
400 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, ON
K1N108
Dear Mrs. Lysyshyn:
I wish to thank the US Environments! Protection Agency (EPA) for
contacting Environment Canada, the Province of British Columbia, and
the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade regarding their
Interest In collecting swdimtnt and water samples from the Canadian
portion of the Columbia Rhw within the Province of Briton Columbia I
undmsiand these camples were to a*slst the EPA in determining whether
Lake Roosevett In the Stattfof Washington should be classified as a US
Sijperf and site.
It f* my understanding ttwt cooperation on addressing
environmental issues in tiis region la exemplary, However, tt ia dear that
the EPA'* request to collect sediment and water sample* in Canada for
US Superfund purposes and for potential rrtJgatfon In the US Is different
and ouialde the normal areas of cooperation. Dltousiiom between
Canadian and US officials suugest In fact that a request of thte nature is
without precedent end a guiding framework.
-------
-2-
Of specific Merest to the Government of Canada, is how issues
concerning reciprocity, sovereignty, and llabiifty will be addressed fn the
absence of a deariy defined framework, ReoognWng the potential
Implication* for both countries, Canada has reservations about
proceeding on an ad hoc basis and would recommend thai we discuss
this matter more fully before ackfmssfnp the EPA'e request
Youre truly.
,Dtoacter
•e" ~ " United Ststoa Tramboundary DMsfon
cc.' Jenns McKay-A/ie. Ctfreebr(Amerfcas Divteton), Environment
Canada
-------
y vf the United State* nj
Oc—cer 3, 2001
Mr. Bruce Levy, Director
United! States Transbcundary Division
Department cf Foreign Affairs & International' Trade
Lester B. Pearson Building, Floor A-£
125 Sussex Drive
Ontario K1A CG2
Dear Mr. Levy:
I am responding to a letter by Anne Charles of July 23,
2001 addressed to my predecessor, Susan Lysyshyn, regarding cne
request cy the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Superfund prograir. to collect sediment samples from portions of
the Columbia River in Canada within the Province of Britisn"
Columbia. I would like to clarify ana more thoroughly explain
che purpose, benefits and possible implications of EFA' s
proposed sampling in Canada, as well as restate my Government's
request to perform this sampling.
The EPA Superfunc program, is undertaking an assessment of
contamination in a portion cf the Coiumoia River in Washington
Szate just south of the U.S. -Canada border. EPA is conducting
this assessment at the request of tne Coivzlle Confederateo
Tribes and the Spokane Trioe of Indians of Washington Stats.
This also involv«s the assessment of approximately ninety (90;
mines and mills in tne U.S. that have been identified as
potential contaminant sources to the Columbia River. In order
to establish '"background" or " reference"" concentrations, SPA is
seeking to collect sediment samples froT. locations upstream of
potential contaminant sources. Basse en the location of
potential contaminant sources and the direction of River flc^,
ideal locations to collect "background" or w reference" samples
are near Lower Arrow Laks in Castlegar, B.C. and along the ?end
Oreille River ir. Canada just north of the international
boundary, A figure shewing the proposed sample locations is
provided in Enclosure 1. Further explanation of the sampling
proposed, including E?A' s intended coordination efforts with
the Government of Canada, is provided in Enclosure 2.
Analytical resjlts of sadircent samples collected frorr
"background" or "reference" locations in Canada would nerely be
.compared to the resjlts cf sediment samples coileczec from
along tne, Columbia River in the 'J . S . Samples collected by EPA
ir. the U.S., in comparison to those proposed for collection in
Canada, will help determine if seme portion of C.S. waters
snould be pnontizec for further investigation and cleer.up.
-------
Accordingly, E?A is see-cing to gather data for purposes of s-t-s
prioritizaticn, not fcr potential Litigation in U.S. courts
against Canadian interests.
Additionally, for tne information to ofe useful, it is
important that the protocols under which these samples are
teken match tr.ose of samples collected in the U.S. I assume
you chat Canada's consent: regarding the proposed sampling does'
not constitute an open-ended commitment to allow future EPA
activities in Canadian territory, If. EPA cetermines that
additional sampling is required, EPA will again, consult with
ana seek the consent of the Canadian government.
Excellent exarples of bi-naticnai cooperation abound, sucr.
as the sampling conducted by Envirar-rnant Canada an the United
States near Superfund sites along the Niagara ana St. Lawrer.ce
fivers to help fulfill the goals of the Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement. Another demonstration of trans-boundary
cooperation includes'sampling conducted this year in Canada by
-he United States Geclogical Survey ana the Washington Staea
Department of Ecology ac Lower Arrow Lai
-------
-3-
I hops this clarification of £?A's request addresses cne
concerns raised in your letter. If you approve EPA tc conduct
sampling with this clarification, we will inform EPA to prccsec
ir. close coordination and communication with Environment Canada
ana SC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection. However, if
you have adalcicnsi questions, and/or desire a meeting cr
conference call, this office would be happy to coordinate it.
Because it is important for SPA to complete all
assessment-related activities within the statutory deadline of
August 2002, we look forward to your response to this
clarification as scon as possible. If you feel a meeting is
required, we would like to mest witn you by October 12, 2001.
Thank you for your interest in this matter and I look forward
tc receiving your response.
Finally, I will call your office in the next few days to
request s.r. appointment to meet you, as clearly there will oe
other issues of putaal, interest with which we will both be
involved in the future.
Sincerely,
Michael F. Gallagher
Environment, Science & Technology
Counselor
Enclosures: As stated.
Cc: Jenna McKay-Alie,
Environment Canada
-------
< MILES
I -.
W&sr.inotan
, J.
.1* ..'-
--EGSSD:
-------
Enclosure 2
Proposed Sampling by EPA in Canada
What is the purpose of EPA's sampling in Canada?
To collect "background'" or '-reference" samples in relation to EPA's on-going assessment of
contamination along the U.S. portion of the Co'.umbia Paver south of the International Boundary.
How will the data be used?
Analytical results of the "background1' or "reference" samples will be compared to sedimem
samples collected from the U.S. portion of the Columbia River. This information will help EPA
determine if some portion of U S. waters should be prioritized for further investigation and
cleanup.
What sample mediaytype will b« collected?
Surface sediment samples similar in sediment type/grain size to sediment samples collected in
the U.S.
What chemical analyses will be conducted on each sample?
Metals, pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Where are the-proposed sample locations? (Please see figure presented in Enclosure 1)
Lower Arrow Lake in Castlegar, B.C.
near Hugh Kennkyside and Brilliant Dams in Ca«t!egar
near Waneta and Sevenmile Dams along the Pcnd Oreille Rivei;
Up to four different sediment types are proposed for collection at each of these locations.
Examples of sediment types are; coarse, fine, very fine, etc.
How were these locations determined?
For purposes of EPA's assessment "background" or ''reference'' concentrations are established
by collecting samples upstream or outside the influence of potential contaminant sources. Based
on the location of potential contaminant sources to the portion of the Columbia River being
assessed by EPA and the direction of River flow, the proposed locations in Canada are idea]
"background" or "reference71 sample locations.
When is the proposed sampling event?
Because it is important for EPA to complete all assessment-related activities within the statutory'
deadline of August 2002, the desired time frame to conduct sample collection is October 2001.
Some examples of '"assessment-related activities" are; sample collection and laboratory anahsis
data validation, evaluation and interpretation of results, and report writing
What are EPA's intended coordination efforts with Canada for this proposed sampling
event?
EPA intends to full> coordinate and communicate planned sampling activities and
schedule with Environment Canada and BC Ministry of Water. Land and Air Protection
(WLAP) prior to conducting any samplt collection activities in Canada.
-------
Enclosure 2
Page 2
EPA will provide Environment Canada and WLAP early nonce of its planned schedule.
Both will be provided the opportunity to accompany EPA during field sampling activities.
as well as the opportunity to assist in sample collection.
EPA will seek input from Environment Canada and WLAP staff regarding the proposed
sample locations given their familiarity with River conditions and charactensties.
EPA will ensure the opportunity for Environment Canada and WLAP to obtain spin
samples.
EPA intends to provide environment Canada with a copy of its Sampling Plan and has
already provided WHAP with a copy of the Plan as part of the collaborative information
sharing effort in the region.
EPA intends to provide Environment Canada and WLAP with a copy of the sample
results as soon as it is available and will continue to keep both offices informed of EPA's
activities related to the assessment of the U.S. portion of the Columbia River.
-------
RECORD OF
COMMUNICATION
f.l.l
PHONE CALL QDISCUSSION QFIELOTRIP rjCONFERENCI
(SPECIFY)
(Record of Item checked above)
T€T: EPfl I Recton \V ~
e of a*nercd Counsel fOQc)
of lr»terrYtf»ora} te
0=f»r4rnen<--
cf-
us
DATE
4^/2002.
TIME
SUBJECT
n
La^jsr
SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION
Monica Tonel , £ PA feglon 10 Si-fe Asses-smeni Man^sr,
- over view of Supe^fun^ «i-le ossses5
- ov/erv/levA/ cf upper OLaroto'a River
of &f/xS
In C^triCLcAA,
of
aod
or lovuer
»n
aouern«^x«-nrt- of
per rnVs-si on
»n
\n -Hne posse&ioo op ECL .
-followed by Q ^ A .
up uJtHi PMer
on
of
be
tov.-Hatr\
EPA Fan* 13004 (7-72) REPLACES EPA HQ FORM BUOO-J WHICH MAY BE USED UNTIL SUPPLY is EXHAUSTED.
-------
Note: This page is
intentionally left blank.
-------
UNFTEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
JUN - 6 2002
Reply To
Attn Of: ECL-115
Mr. Peter Fawcett, Deputy Director
United States Transboundary Division
Department of Foreign Affairs &
International Trade
Lester B. Pearson Building, Floor A-6
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OG2
Dear Mr. Fawcett:
I am writing as a follow-up to the teleconference of
April 25, 2002, between U.S. and Canadian government staff
regarding the request by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to collect sediment samples from Lower Arrow Lake in
Canada. We have also requested the extra volume of sediment
collected by the British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air
Protection (WLAP) during its past Columbia River monitoring
effort.
I appreciate your taking the time to speak with my staff on
these matters. As discussed during the teleconference, the
dialogue between U.S. and Canada regarding EPA's request to
obtain access to Lower Arrow Lake was initiated in the Spring of
2001. The Region appreciated the commitment by you to respond to
our requests within two weeks of the April 25 teleconference and
remains hopeful that a response is forthcoming. To streamline
the process, please include in your letter a designated contact
for future reference.
- EPA -is continuing to consider all possible options in
establishing "background" concentrations for its ongoing
investigation of hazardous substance contamination along the U.S.
portion of- the upper Columbia River in northeast Washington. The
Region will be reviewing the quality and usability of analytical
data provided by The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian
Reservation pertinent to sediment samples collected from the
Columbia River Basin in Canada. In accordance with the
government-to-government relationship between EPA and the Tribes,
EPA is obligated to consider and review the quality and usability
of this information. A copy of the analytical data has been
provided to Canadian federal government staff.
fPapa
-------
'Thank you for your valued involvement in this matter. We
look forward to your written response to our requests and future
cooperation between both countries in addressing contamination
issues.
Sincerely,
cc:
Regional Administrator
Christine Todd Whitman, EPA Administrator
Mike Gallagher, US Embassy-Ottawa
Marianne Horinko, EPA Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Judith Ayers, EPA Office of International Activities
Pete Christich, EPA Office of Interational Activities
Eric Running, U.S. State Department
Tom Fitzsimmons, Director, WA Department of Ecology
Derek Thompson, Minister of BC - Water Land & Air
Protection (WLAP)
Tim Hodges, Canadian Embassy
-------
APPENDIX K
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS AND DATA VALIDATION REPORTS RELATING TO THE
SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTED FROM LOWER ARROW LAKE DURING THE
ECOLOGY 2001 SAMPLING EVENT
-------
Projact Name-
WC
Program.
&Ar P
Laboratory Analyses Required
Send Result*to Daue. Se»'Jg.r Mill Stop:
* MVOES
/•*
n»/lO/O\
Yr Mo [ Oa Hf Mn
Qj ClSN'OOIOlC)
Seal 1 0
Co/i)jj»ion
-------
Manchester Environmental Laboratory
7411 Beach Dr E, Port Orchard, Washington 98366
Case Narrative
August 7,2002
Subject. Metals Quality Assurance Memo for FDR Sediment Toxicity Study
Officer- Dave Serdar
By: Dean Momohara
Summary
The data generated by the analysis of these samples can be used with the qualifications
noted in this memo. The samples were analyzed on 07/09/01 The results are from
analytes simultaneously analyzed but not requested by the client at that time. In some
cases, adequate quality control samples (QC) were not analyzed and/or QC results did not
meet validation. These results should be treated accordingly
All analyses requested were evaluated by established regulatory quality assurance
guidelines
Sample Information
Samples were received by Manchester Environmental Laboratory on 05/10/01 in good
condition,
Holding Times
All analyses were performed within established EPA holding times.
Calibration
Instrument calibrations and calibration checks were performed in accordance with the
appropriate method All calibration checks were within control limits Balances are
professionally calibrated yearly and calibrated in-house daily.
-------
Method Blanks
No analytically significant levels of analyte were detected in the method blanks
associated with these samples.
Matrix Spikes
The matrix spike recoveries for iron were not calculated due to the native source
concentration being significantly higher than the spike. The data was qualified as an
estimate.
Spikes were not analyzed for potassium, magnesium, silver, antimony and tin analyses.
The data associated with these analytes were qualified as estimates. All other matrix
spike recoveries were within the acceptance limits of+ 25%
Replicates
All duplicate relative percent differences of samples with concentrations greater than 5
times the reporting limit were within acceptance limits of less than 20%,
Laboratory Control Samples
The iron, chromium and antimony laboratory control sample recoveries were beyond
control limits The data associated with these analytes were qualified as estimates. All
other laboratory control sample recoveries were within acceptance limits.
Other Quality Assurance Measures and Issues
The beryllium initial calibration verification result was beyond the control limit. The
data associated with this analyte was qualified as an estimate.
U - The analyte was not detected at or above the reported result.
J - The analyte was positively identified. The associated numerical result is
an estimate
UJ - The'analyte was not detected at or above the reported estimated result.
NAF - Not analyzed for
NC - Not Calculated
-------
bold - The analyte was present in the sample. (Visual Aid to locate detected
compounds on report sheet)
Please call Dean Momohara at (360) 871-8808 to further discuss this project.
cc Project File
-------
Washington State Department of Ecology
Manchester Environmental Laboratory
Analysis Report for
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Project Name: FDR Sediment
s™&mi&&w&&
Field ID: LOWERARRO
Project Officer: Dave Serdar
Analyte
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Silver
Beryllium
Chromium
Iron
Potassium
Magnesium
Antimony
Tin
Toxicity LIMS Project ID: 1503-01
UMif^I'M^ Date Collected: 05/07/01 Method: SW6010
Date Prepared: 05/22/01 Matrix: Sediment/Soil
Date Analyzed: 07/09/01 Units: mg/Kg dw
Result Qualifier
2 U
0.47
3.5
11
26.9
27.2
2.1
47.0
13.4
5 U
5 U
5.93
0.5 UJ
05 UJ
12.0 J
3650 J
447 J
1690 J
4 UJ
5 UJ
Authorized By
7
Release Date
Page-1
-------
Washington State Department of Ecology
Manchester Environmental Laboratory
Analysis Report for
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Project Name: FDR Sediment
Sample: Oll*8Q4
Field ID: LOWERARRO
Project Officer: DaveSerdar
Analyte
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Silver
Beryllium
Chromium
Iron
Potassium
Magnesium
Antimony
Tin
Toxlcity
Mn&ti&& D*» Collected: 05/07/01
Date Prepared: 05/22/01
Date Analyzed: 07/09/01
Result Qualifier
2 U
0.44
3.6
12
26.8
26.8
1.8
45.2
11.5
5 U
5 U
5.58
0.5 UJ
0.5 UJ
11.8 J
3490 J
446 J
1400 J
4 UJ
5 UJ
LIMS Project ID: 1503-01
Method: SW6010
Matrix: Sediment/Soil
Units: mg/Kg dw
Authorized By:
Release Date:
Page: 1
-------
Washington State Department of Ecology
Manchester Environmental Laboratory
Analysis Report for
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Project Name: FDR Sediment Toxicity
Sample: y
Field ID: LOWERARRO
Project Officer: Dave Serdar
Date Collected: 05/07/01
Date Prepared: 05/22/01
Date Analyzed: 07/09/01
LIMS Project ID: 1503-01
Method: SW6010
Matrix: Sediment/Soil
Units: % Recovery
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Silver
Beryllium
Chromium
Iron
Potassium
Magnesium
Antimony
Tin
104
104
103
98
97
99
100
98
96
102
107
101
120
98
NAF
NC
NAF
NAF
NAF
NAF
Authorized By:
* t s\S\
Release Date:
Page: 1
-------
Washington State Department of Ecology
Manchester Environmental Laboratory
Analysis Report for
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Project Name: FDR Sediment
Field ID: LOWERARRO
Project Officer: DaveSerdar
Analyte
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Silver
Beryllium
Chromium
Iron
Potassium
Magnesium
Antimony
Tin
Toxicity LIMS Project ID; 1503-01
iilllil^ilii' Date Collected: 05/07/01 Method: SW6010
Date Prepared: 05/22/01 Matrix: Sediment/Soil
Date Analyzed: 07/09/01 Unite: % Recovery
Result Qualifier
104
104
104
98
98
100
101
100
95
102
108
102
NAF
121
100
NC
NAF
NAF
NAF
NAF
Authorized By, ~&n&—M. f &\
Release Dale:
Pagc; 1
-------
APPENDIX L
GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION
-------
Table 1-1—Grain Size Classification of Sediment Samples
Station
ID
CS001
CS002
CS003
CS004
CS005
CS006
CS007
CS008
CS009
CS010
CS011
CS012
CS013
CS014
CS015
CS016
CS01L
CS017
CS018
CS019
CS020
CS021
CS022
CS023
CS024
CS025
CS026
CS027
CS028
CS029
CS030
CS031
CS032
CS033
CS034
CS035
CS036
CS037
CS038
CS039
CS040
CS041
CS042
CS043
CS044
CS045
CS046
CS047
CS048
Internal
Sample ID
CR-003-SD
CR-001-SD
CR-004-SD
CR-005-SD
CR-006-SD
CR-007-SD
CR-008-SD
CR-009-SD
CR-010-SD
CR-011-SD
CR-012-SD
CR-013-SD
CR-014-SD
CR-015-SD
CR-016-SD
CR-017-SD
CR-018-SD
CR-066-SD
CR-019-SD
CR-020-SD
CR-023-SD
CR-022-SD
CR-024-SD
CR-025-SD
CR-062-SD
CR-026-SD
CR-029-SD
CR-027-SD
CR-028-SD
CR-030-SD
CR-031-SD
CR-032-SD
CR-033-SD
CR-034-SD
CR-036-SD
CR-035-SD
CR-037-SD
CR-038-SD
CR-039-SD
CR-040-SD
CR-041-SD
CR-042-SD
CR-043-SD
CR-044-SD
CR-045-SD
CR-046-SD
CR-047-SD
CR-048-SD
CR-049-SD
Grain Size II Station
Class || ID
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
2
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
2
TS008
TS009
TS010
TS011
TS012
TS013
TS014
TS015
TS016
TS017
TS018
TS019
TS020
TS021
TS022
TS023
TS024
TS025
TS026
TS027
TS028
TS029
TS030
TS031
TS032
TS033
TS034
TS035
TS036
TS037
TS038
TS039
TS040
TS041
3 I TS042
3 HTS043
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TS044
TS045
TS046
TS047
TS048
TS049
TS050
TS051
TS052
TS053
TS054
TS055
TS056
Internal
Sample ID
TR-064-SD
TR-063-SD
TR-065-SD
TR-066-SD
TR-068-SD
TR-067-SD
TR-069-SD
TR-070-SD
TR-071-SD
TR-072-SD
TR-073-SD
TR-074-SD
TR-075-SD
TR-076-SD
TR-077-SD
TR-078-SD
TR-079-SD
TR-080-SD
TR-081-SD
TR-082-SD
TR-083-SD
TR-084-SD
TR-085-SD
TR-086-SD
TR-087-SD
TR-088-SD
TR-089-SD
TR-128-SD
TR-129-SD
TR-090-SD
TR-091-SD
TR-093-SD
TR-094-SD
TR-095-SD
TR-096-SD
TR-097-SD
TR-104-SD
TR-105-SD
TR-106-SD
TR-107-SD
TR-098-SD
TR-099-SD
TR-125-SD
TR-100-SD
TR-101-SD
TR-102-SD
TR-103-SD
TR-108-SD
TR-109-SD
Grain Size
Class
4
1
1
4
3
2
1
3
3
4
4
1
4
4
2
4
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
4
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
1
4
2
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Station
ID
TS068
TS069
TS070
TS071
TS072
TS073
TS074
TS075
TS076
TS077
TS078
TS079
TS080
TS081
TS082
TS083
TS084
TS085
TS086
TS087
TS088
TS089
TS090
TS091
TS092
TS093
TS094
TS095
TS096
TS097
TS098
TS099
TS100
TS101
TS102
TS103
TS104
TS105
TS106
TS107
TS108
TS109
TS110
US001
US002
US003
US004
US005
US006
Internal
Sample ID
TR-115-SD
TR-119-SD
TR-116-SD
TR-117-SD
TR-118-SD
TR-120-SD
TR-121-SD
TR-122-SD
TR-001-SD
TR-002-SD
TR-005-SD
TR-004-SD
TR-006-SD
TR-007-SD
TR-008-SD
TR-009-SD
TR-010-SD
TR-011-SD
TR-012-SD
TR-013-SD
TR-014-SD
TR-016-SD
TR-040-SD
TR-127-SD
TR-041-SD
TR-017-SD
TR-018-SD
TR-019-SD
TR-042-SD
TR-020-SD
TR-022-SD
TR-043-SD
TR-023-SD
TR-044-SD
TR-024-SD
TR-025-SD
TR-045-SD
TR-047-SD
TR-026-SD
TR-027-SD
TR-028-SD
TR-029-SD
TR-030-SD
BK-150-SD
BK-152-SD
BK-153-SD
BK-155-SD
BK-130-SD
BK-131-SD
Grain Size
Class
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
4
NA
2
2
NA
1
2
2
3
3
2
1
3
NA
1
2
1
4
1
2
1
2
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
01-033 Irxls Table 1-1
Page 1 of 2
12/17/01
-------
Table 1-1—Grain Size Classification of Sediment Samples
Station
ID
CS049
CS050
CS051
CS052
TS001
TS002
TS003
TS004
TS005
TS006
TS007
internal
Sample ID
CR-050-SD
CR-051-SD
CR-052-SD
CR-053-SD
TR-056-SD
TR-057-SD
TR-058-SD
TR-059-SD
TR-061-SD
TR-062-SD
TR-060-SD
Grain Size
Class
1
2
1
1
4
4
3
3
1
2
1
Station
ID
TS057
TS058
TS059
TS060
TS061
TS062
TS063
TS064
TS065
TS066
TS067
Internal
Sample ID
TR-110-SD
TR-111-SD
TR-112-SD
TR-113-SD
TR-123-SD
TR-124-SD
TR-126-SD
TR-037-SD
TR-038-SD
TR-039-SD
TR-114-SD
Grain Size
Class
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
Station
ID
US007
US008
US009
US010
US011
US012
US013
US014
US015
US016
Internal
Sample ID
BK-134-SD
BK-135-SD
BK-133-SD
BK-139-SD
BK-142-SD
BK-140-SD
BK-138-SD
TR-147-SD
TR-145-SD
TR-136-SD
Grain Size
Class
3
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
Grain Size Classes:
1. < 25% fines
2. Greater than 25% but less than 50% fines
3. Greater than 50% but less than 75% fines
4. > 75% fines
NA: Not available
01 -033 Irxls Table 1-1
Page 2 of 2
12/17/01
-------
REFERENCES
Byrd, V.G. and N. Norvell. 1993. Status of the Pribiiof Shrew Based on Summer Distribution and
Habitat Use. Northwestern Naturalist:49-74.
Envirotech Diving. 1995. Dive Survey, St. Paul Island, AK. Prepared for UniSea, Inc.
Freese, L. J. and R.P. Stone. 1993. Baseline Environmental Survey of Nearshore Habitat at East
Landing, St. Paul Island, Pribiiof Islands, Alaska. Alaska Fisheries and Science Center Auke Bay
Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska.
Lamb, M. City of St. Paul. St. Paul, Alaska. Telephone conversation with Jim Siriano (SAIC), July
1995.
Philemonof, A. City of St. George. St. George, Alaska. Telephone conversation with Jim Siriano
(SAIC), July 1995.
Richardson W.J., Greene, Jr., C.R., Malme, C.I., and D.H. Thomson. 1991. Effects of Noise on
Marine Mammals. Prepared by LGL Ecological Research, Inc. for the U.S. Department of the
Interior, Minerals Management Service, Herndon, VA. 419 pp. with Appendices and Index.
Rukovishnikoff, J. City of St. Paul. St. Paul, Alaska. Telephone conversation with Jim Siriano (SAIC),
July 1995.
Sherwonit, B. 1994. Taking Back the Pribiiofs. Alaska, September 1994, pp. 24-31.
U.S. EPA, 1994a. Biological Assessment of Seafood Processing Wastes on Threatened and
Endangered Species in Alaskan Waters. Draft Report prepared by Tetra Tech. 25 pp.
U.S. EPA. 1994fa. Environmental Assessment: Proposed Reissuance of NPDES Permit for Seafood
Processors in Alaska. 25 pp.
U.S. EPA., 1994c. Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation for the General NPDES Permit for Alaskan
Seafood Processors: Draft Technical Report. Prepared by Tetra Tech.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Draft Pribiiof Seafood General Permit No. AK-G52-POOO. Authorizations to
Discharge Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Seafood Processors
Within Three Nautical Miles of the Pribiiof Islands. 26 pp.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. NPDES Permit No. AK-G52-0000. Authorization to Discharge Under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Seafood Processors in Alaska. 57 pp.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. Biological Assessment of Seafood Processing Discharges on Threatened,
Endangered, and Special Status Species of the Pribiiof Islands, Alaska, Prepared by Science
Applications International Corporation.
17
------- |