EPA910/R-9&O13
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle WA 98101
Manchester Laboratory
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
January i997
The Shoalwater Bay
Reservation
A Limited
Environmental
Assessment:
1994 -1995
-------
&EFA
United States Environmental Protection Agency f~ \t> '*'.\ ' < , -: "'>«.. *V;*-, *':'-'-:<-•;'-'- '.- ' \,",-*"
Region 10,1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA98101-1128 -* <; > ; \> ? :-f, '•'$ l/\ * ?>(-^t< V«; , V^.'*-
-------
DISCLAIMER
JThis report has been reviewed by the Office of Environmental Assessment. EPA Region 10, the
Shoalwater Bay Tribal Health Board, and the Shoalwater Bay Health Concerns Advisory
Committee, and approved for distribution. Mention of trade names or commercial products in
this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of use.
n
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-EPAJearnedo£analarming^tatistieconcerning4heShoaLwaterJBay IndianJTribe^jf
Western Washington: Over 90 per cent of Tribal pregnancies between 1990 and 1992 had ended
in miscarriage, stillbirth, or infant death within the first year of life. In addition, a high number of
other reproductive problems and birth defects were reported by the Tribe.
Although human health studies were being conducted by the Washington State Department of
Health and the Indian Health Service, insufficient information existed to determine whether an
environmental component to infant survival might exist. Additionally, Tribal members were
concerned that their natural home, located along the shores of Willapa Bay in Southwestern
Washington, was not safe. Tribal elders spoke offish and shellfish that no longer inhabited their
shores and of concerns about what might be hidden in the soils of a nearby dump. The Tribe felt
their lives were integrally tied to the environment, and if the water, the wildlife and the fish were
being threatened, so might their existence. As Herb Whitish, Chairman and tireless spokesman for
the Tribe, said, "The Shoalwaters could be the proverbial canary in the mine for the entire Willapa
Bay."
After meeting with the Tribe about their concerns, as well as with members of other federal,
county and state agencies, EPA began a limited environmental assessment—to take a snapshot—of
the quality of household drinking water, fresh and marine surface water, and various sediment
routes which constitute important environmental exposure pathways for the Tribe and
surrounding environs. Although EPA did not expect to find a direct link between environmental
conditions and infant mortality, it was determined that there were many questions that scientists,
environmentalists, business people, and Tribal members could not answer without this
information.
In consultation, with the Tribe and others, four specific pathways of potential environmental
exposure were chosen for analysis: (1) drainage from a nearby abandoned dump; (2) agricultural
runoff from cranberry farms, forestry and other sources; (3) tideflat sediments on or near Tribal
lands, and (4) drinking water at Tribal household taps.
Between June, 1994 and March, 1996, EPA scientists and field staff gathered information,
conducted on-site investigations, and analyzed samples at the EPA laboratory at Manchester,
Washington. The quality of project data was established by strict adherence to all standard EPA
laboratory protocols and data validation guidelines. In addition, the Tribe had some of the
samples analyzed independently at a private laboratory.
Inasmuch as the study was dealing with issues so vital to the Tribe, results and an interpretation of
their significance were communicated to them in person on a real time basis. Information was
also directly communicated to the Shoalwater Health Concerns Advisory Committee for their
review and integration with Tribal medical records and other health related data. EPA's Senior
Toxicologist and project lead for this study serves as EPA representative to this Committee made
up of scientists and medical doctors from eight different organizations throughout the country.
111
-------
Of the four environmental pathways examined, drainage from cranberry bogs was the most
troubling. Several pesticides found in the runoff in this area were at levels that exceed federal and
state water quality standards. Risks to humans or animals that might wade in the ditch or drink
surface water during periods of application are considerable, as are risks to "non target" species
such as fish, aquatic birds, and small invertebrates.
For drinking water, low levels of total coliform bacteria were found at about 14 per cent of the
households tested. Tests for fecal coliform and for the presence of chlorine led investigators to
conclude there was insufficient chlorination to treat bacteria in some of the systems. Examination
of water from household taps showed slight elevations for some "first-pour" samples—a typical
response for older water delivery systems—but no violations of federal lead standards were
observed.
Results from the dump site waste stream showed no obvious significant risks to human health or
the environment.
Sediment samples from the tideflats were relatively clean. However, two compounds were found
that mimic herbicide compounds not typically used in marine environments. One is not currently
registered for use in the U.S. While the report concludes that these two compounds are most
likely natural by-products of the marine environment, however further research to identify and
characterize these compounds is recommended.
An important component of this study is the recommendation for further research in areas not
covered by this limited investigation, and where concerns were identified. For example, two
exposure pathways—air and ground water—were not examined. Vulnerable ground water
resources under areas of pesticide application and runoff should be investigated. Likewise, air
monitoring in targeted areas during pesticide and herbicide applications is needed. The report
suggests further study of the long term ecological impacts of carbaryl and glyphosate applications,
used to eradicate "ghost shrimp" and Spartina cord grass, respectively.
The report also recommends improved management practices, public education and technical
assistance in such areas as drinking water, septic system operations and pest management.
As expected, this study did not uncover a direct link between infant mortality and environmental
conditions. It did however, provide the Tribe reasonable assurance that the areas examined on
and near the reservation were relatively clean and that others, like drinking water, could be
improved by fairly simple procedures, such as chlorination and the flushing of tap water. Tribal
concerns about the effects of pesticides and herbicides on the Willapa Bay ecosystem are given
credence by the findings of the report. At this time, long term effects are unknown and further
study is clearly needed.
This study represents science in its most human form—empathy for the fears of an under-
represented, small group of people, concern about the effects of man's treatment of the landscape,
and commitment to sound scientific methods. It reflects many hours of discussion with Tribal
members and their staff, as well as consultation with scientists and environmental program
specialists outside EPA Region 10.
iv
-------
Although the Shoalwater Tribe is the primary client for this work, it provided valuable experience
for the Agency in terms of strengthening its cross-program focus and effectively utilizing in-house
scientific talent. It may very well set a template for the Region and the Agency to more
effectively and credibly address future complex multidisciplinary and ecosystem-driven health
issues which lie "outside the box" of traditional EPA business.
Julie Hagensen,
Assistant Regional Administrator
for Washington Operations
-------
ABSTRACT
^The Shoalwater BayJndian-Reservation-is located-orLWillapaJBay^an^ecologicalLyJiyer&ehut
rapidly developing, multi-use Pacific Coast estuary. The Tribe has recently experienced various
reproductive problems, typified by an unusually high infant mortality rate. As part of an ongoing
evaluation conducted by various health agencies and experts, EPA Region 10 performed a
screening assessment of four nearby environmental exposure pathways important to the Tribe.
These included: (1) An abandoned dump drainage to a tidal slough, (2) various tideflat sites in the
vicinity of the Reservation subject to occasional direct applications of pesticides under special
permits, (3) drainage from nearby cranberry bogs receiving intensive pesticide application, and (4)
drinking water at 42 stations including two wells and taps at 40 buildings.
Drinking water excepted, only a small number of environmental samples were taken. However,
each sample was tested extensively for likely /relevant chemical and/or microbiological
contamination. This study was intended to be a one-time sampling "snapshot", and was not
designed to specifically examine other vital exposure pathways such as air and ground water.
Results revealed no specific environmental contamination to suggest a causal or contributory
relationship to the Tribe's ongoing health and reproductive problems. At the dump site drainage,
findings were not indicative of a contamination problem. However, the study did reveal some
ongoing contaminant problems and issues in the Willapa Bay ecosystem which need to be
addressed.
The most obvious environmental problem was pesticide contamination of surface water in runoff
from cranberry bogs, where DDT, azinphos-methyl, chlorpyrifos, and diazinon were detected at
excessive levels, some of which exceeded Federal and/or state water quality standards.
Intensive chemical residue analysis of tideflat sediments appeared unremarkable, except for the
unexpected but pervasive findings—usually at levels of hundreds of ug/kg~of two "novel" bromo
and iodo compounds: 4-hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzoic acid, and its iodo analog. Mass spectral
properties of the two compounds respectively resemble those of the two synthetic herbicides,
bromoxynil and ioxynil, neither of which is known to be applied in the Willapa Bay area. Because
of their ubiquitous presence at remarkably consistent levels— from greatly divergent tideflat areas
and at different timeframes (February and August)~they appear to be natural products, rather
than deliberately introduced xenobiotics.
In all but one case, tideflat shellfish and overlying seawater collected from representative Willapa
Bay and Tribal areas did not violate current standards for levels of enteric bacteria. However,
surface water sampled near the Tribal "swimming hole" showed recent fecal contamination,
possibly indicating a faulty septic system.
Drinking water lead concentrations at all household taps tested were all below EPA's lead action
level of 0.015 mg/1, but a significant number were positive for total coliforms, indicating the need
for better chlorination of delivery systems, both on and off-Reservation.
VI
-------
In screening for possible ecotoxicological effects in area shellfish, histopathological assays
revealed no evidence of gonadal neoplasia among 51 samples of the softshell clam Mya arenaria
obtained from the Tribal "swimming hole", and from the North River /Smith Creek inlet to
Willapa Bay.
Several recommendations are made for further environmental research, technical investigations,
and modifications in resource management practices. These specifically include screening for
possible contaminants in local ground water and air, determining the identity and sources of the
two novel halogenated tideflat compounds, improvement of drinking water delivery and sanitation
containment systems, and developing better pesticide regulatory and management solutions for
the area. Further studies are also recommended to address possible health and environmental
risks of carbaryl and glyphosate, which are directly applied to local tideflat areas to respectively
control "ghost shrimp", and invasive populations of Spartina cord grass.
vn
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer ii
Executive Summary iii
Abstract vi
Table of Contents : viii
List of Figures xiii
List of Tables xiv
Acronyms xv
Contributors xvii
Acknowledgments xviii
Section Number Page Number
Chapter 1.0 BACKGROUND 1
1.1 The Shoalwater Indians 1
1.2 Major Problems with Reproductive Health Outcomes 1
1.3 Findings of the Final Joint Report 3
1.4 Historically Inadequate Access to Health Care 3
1.5 Formation of the Shoalwater Bay Health Concerns Advisory Committee 4
1.6 The Shoalwater Bay Tribal Health Board 4
Chapter 2.0 INTRODUCTION 5
2.1 Possible Environmental Risk Factors: A Prelude to EPAs Involvement 5
2.2 EPA Undertakes a Preliminary Environmental Study 5
Chapter 3.0 SCOPE AND DESIGN OF EPA STUDY 7
3.1 Drainage From the Nearby Dump Site 7
3.1.1 Number and Type of Samples Taken 9
3.1.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern 9
3.1.3 Water Analytes of Concern 9
3.2 Agricultural Runoff from Cranberry Bogs, Forestry, and Other Sources ........ 10
3.2.1 Numbers and Types of Samples Taken 10
3.2.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern 11
3.2.3 Water Analytes of Concern 12
3.3 Tideflat Sediment in the Vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribal Lands 12
3.3.1 Number and Types of Samples Taken 12
3.3.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern 14
3.3.3 Microbiological Screening: Two Intertidal Water Samples 15
3.4 Drinking Water Stations in the Vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation . 15
Vlll
-------
. Chapter 4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND METHODOLOGIES 18
4.1 Sample Collection 18
4.1.1 Sediment 24
4.1.2 Water 24
4Tl.2.1 Surface Water 24
4.1.2.2 Drinking Water 24
4.1.3 Microbiology 25
4.1.3.1 Field Methods 25
. 4.1.3.2 Laboratory Methods 26
4.2 Station Locations by Global Positioning System . . . 26
Chapter 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS 27
5.1 Project Objectives and Data Quality Objectives 27
5.2 QA/QC Samples 28
5.3 Validation of Project Data 28
5.4 Results from the Validation of Project Data 28
5.4.1 Data Quality Elements Used For Evaluation of Organics Data 46
5.4.2 Elements Used For Evaluation of Inorganics Data 47
5.4.3 Evaluation of Data Validation Reports 48
Chapter 6.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 49
6.1 Dump Site Drainage toward Tidelands 49
6.1.1 Metals in Dump Site Sediment 49
6.1.2 Metals in Dump Site Water 50
6.1.3 Organics in Dump Site Sediment 51
6.1.3.1 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 51
6.1.3.2 Pesticide Residues 52
6.1.3.3 Two Novel Bromo and lodo Compounds 53
6.1.4 Organics in Dump Site Water 53
6.1.5 Concurrent Environmental Investigations on the Reservation: The
"livestock dipping station" 54
6.1.6 Microbiology: Dump Site Water and Leachate 55
6.1.7 Conductivity Survey at the Dump Site 56
6.2 Agricultural Runoff from Cranberry Bogs toward Tidelands 56
6.2.1 Metals in Drainage Ditch Sediment 56
6.2.2 Pesticides in Drainage Ditch Sediment 59
6.2.3 Pesticides in Drainage Ditch Water 59
6.2.3.1 Herbicides 59
6.2.3.2 Insecticides .60
6.3 Tideflat Sediments and Shellfish 62
6.3.1 Sediment Screening for Chemical Contaminants 62
6.3.1.1 Metals 62
. 6.3.1.2 Organics 63
6.3.1.2.1 The Swimming Hole 63
6.3.1.2.2 Two Novel Halogenated Compounds:
DBBA and DIBA 64
IX
-------
6.3.2 Microbiology 66
6.3.2.1 Shoalwater Bay Shellfish and Seawater Evaluation 66
6.3.2.2 Occurrence of Microbial Contaminants in Tribal
"Swimming Hole" ; .68
6.3.3 Aquatic Ecosystem Health: Shellfish Gonadal Histopathology 69
6.4 Drinking Water: Household Sampling 70
6.4.1 Chemistry: Tap Water Screening for Lead and Inorganic Parameters .... 70
6.4.2 Microbiology: Source Water Screening for Microbiological
Contaminants from Leaking Septic Systems 71
Chapter 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 75
7.1 CONCLUSIONS 75
7.1.1 Dump Site 75
7.1.2 Tideflats 75
7.1.3 Cranberry Bog Drainage 76
7.1.4 Drinking Water 77
7.1.5 Livestock Dipping Station 77
7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 79
7.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND
TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS 82
Chapter 8.0 REFERENCES • 84
-------
APPENDICES
AppendixA^SHOALWATER.BAYHEALTH-CONCERNS AD^SQRY COMMITTEE
Appendix B: SHOALWATER BAY TRIBAL HEALTH BOARD
Appendix C: COMPOUNDS WHICH WERE NOT DETECTED IN SHOALWATER BAY
SAMPLES
Table C-l. Inorganic Compounds Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-2. Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-3. Semi-Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-4. Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-5. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Cranberry Bog Samples
Table C-6. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Tideflat Samples
Appendix D: METHOD BLANKS WHICH HAD TARGET COMPOUNDS ABOVE THE
QUANTITATION LIMITS
Table D-l. Metals Measurements of Method Blank Samples
Table D-2. Pesticide Measurements of Method Blank Samples
Table D-3. Semi-Volatile Organics Measurements of Method Blank Samples
APPENDIX E: QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR FIELD AND LABORATORY
DUPLICATE SAMPLES AND FOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
(MS/MSD) SAMPLES
Table E-l. QC Data for Metals Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Table E-2. QC Data for General Chemistry Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Table E-3. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples #10, 11, and 12A
Table E-4. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #13 and 14
Table E-5. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #2 and 23
Table E-6. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #4 and 5
Table E-7. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #5 and 8
Table E-8. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #7
Table E-9. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #2 and 14
Table E-10. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #4 and 23
Table E-l 1. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #6 and 7
Table E-12. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #8 and 9
Table E-13. MS/MSD General Chemistry Measurements of Samples #2 and 4
Table E-14. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #10 and 11
Table E-15. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #12A and 13
Table E-l6. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #14 and 2
Table E-l7. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #23
Table E-l9. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #7
xi
-------
Table E-20. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #8
Table Er21. Blind Duplicate Inorganic Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Table E-22. Laboratory Duplicate Inorganics Measurements of Dump Site Samples
Table E-23. Laboratory Duplicate Inorganics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
Table E-24. Laboratory Duplicate Metals Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
Appendix F: DATA QUALIFIERS USED TO VALIDATE ORGANICS DATA
Appendix G: DATA QUALIFIERS USED TO VALIDATE INORGANICS DATA
Appendix H: GPS READINGS FOR PROJECT SAMPLES
xn
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure ^Location of the Shoalwater-Bay-IndianReservation and^projecLsample stations . __2
Figure 2. Sample stations in the drainage from the dump site and cranberry bogs near the
Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation 8
Figure 3. Tideflat sample stations in the vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation ... 13
Figure 4. Sample stations for drinking water survey in the vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay
Indian Reservation 16
Figure 5. Sample stations for drinking water survey 19
Figure 6. Sample stations for drinking water survey at the Shoalwater Bay Indian
Reservation 20
Figure 7. Conductivity survey of surface water at the base of the dump site,
February 21, 1995 57
Figure 8. Conductivity and pH values measured at the base and downstream of the dump site,
February 22, 1995 58
Figure 9. Water types differentiated by major cations and anions 74
Xlll
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Sources of Drinking Water Samples 17
Table 2. List of Sediment and Surface Water Samples 21
Table 3. List of Microbiological Samples 22
Table 4. List of Drinking Water Samples Collected in October, 1995 23
Table 5. Inorganics Measurements of Dump Site Samples 29
Table 6. Organics Measurements of Dump Site Samples 30
Table 7. Tentatively Identified Organics of Dump Site Samples 31
Table 8. Microbiological Measurements of Dump Site Samples 33
Table 9. Inorganics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples 34
Table 10. Organics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples 35
Table 11. Metals Measurements of Tideflat Samples 36
Table 12. Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples .37
Table 13. Tentatively Identified Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples 38
Table 14. Lead Measurements of Drinking Water Samples 40
Table 15. Metals Measurements of Drinking Water Samples 41
Table 16. General Chemistry Measurements of Drinking Water Samples 43
Table 17. Manganese and Iron in Drinking Water Samples 44
Table 18. Microbiological Measurements of Drinking Water Samples 45
Table 19. Microbiological Measurements of Shellfish and Nearby Seawater Samples 67
Table 20. Microbiological Measurements of Swimming Area Samples 68
xiv
-------
ACRONYMS
2,4-D
Ans—
2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid
anions
APHA
BMPs
Cats
CDC
CPU
Chrom.
CIPC
C. perfringens
DBBA
DBBN
DBA
DIBN
DOH
DQOs
E. coli.
EDTA
EPA
FC
FDA
FIFRA
FW
GM
GPS
HPC
ICP/AES
fflS
MCLGs
MCLs
MDL
MHPC
MPN
MS
MS/MSD
NAS
ORD
PAHs
PCBs
PCP
%
PGDN
PST
PVC
American Public Health Association
.best management practices
cations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
colony forming unit
chromatography
isopropyl-3-chlorophenyl carbamate
Clostridium perfringens
4-hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzoic acid
3,5 -dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile
4-hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzoic acid
3,5 -diiodo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile
Department of Health
data quality objectives
Escherichia coli
ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid
Environmental Protection Agency
fecal coliforms
Food and Drug Administration
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
fresh water
geometric mean
Global Positioning System
heterotrophic plate count
inductively coupled plasma / atomic emission spectrometry
Indian Health Service
maximum contaminant level goals
maximum contaminant levels
method detection limit
marine heterotrophic plate count
most probable number
matrix spike
matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate
National Academy of Sciences
Office of Research and Development
polyaromatic hydrocarbons
polychlorinated biphenyls
pentachlorophenol
percent
propylene glycol dinitrate
Pacific standard time
polyvinyl chloride
xv
-------
QA
QA/QC
QAPP
or
quality assurance
quality assurance/quality control
quality assurance project plan
quality control
RCRA
RDX
SBIT
SBTC
SPS
SQL
SR
TAL
TC
TCL
TICs
TNT
TOC
Tot
VOCs
WDOE
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine
Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe
Shoalwater Bay Tribal Council
sulfite polymyxin sulfadiazine
sample quantitation limit
state route
Target Analyte List
total coliforms
Target Compound List
tentatively identified compounds
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene
total organic carbon
total
volatile organic compounds
Washington State Department of Ecology
xvi
-------
CONTRIBUTORS
Project Officer
Michael Watson
Technical Coordinator
Laboratory Analysis (Chemistry)
Microbiology
Project Quality Assurance (QA) Manager
Sampling and Field Operations
Drinking Water
GIS Compilation and Data Management
State, Tribal, and Public Affairs
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Shellfish Histopathology; EPA Narragansett
Michael Johnston
Kathy Parker
Bob Rieck
Randy Cummings
Isa Chamberlain
Steve Reimer
Jay Vasconcelos
Stephanie Harris
Robert Melton
Duane Kama
Dave Terpening
Mike Marsh
David Frank
Craig Paulsen
Rene Fuentes
Bernie Zavala
Sue McCarthy
Tony Morris
Julie Hagensen
Ric Robinson
George Gardner
xvn
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Karl Arne, EPA Region 10 Pesticides Unit
Shoalwater Bay Tribal Health Board
Shoalwater Bay Health Concerns Advisory Committee
XVlll
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 The Shoalwater Indians
The Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe (SB IT) is a small group of Native Americans (about 155
members), many of whom live on or near their 1033 acres of Tribal trust land located in Pacific
County, Washington, on the shores of Willapa Bay (1) (Figure 1). Based on the decennial census,
131 persons resided on the reservation in 1990. Rural and remote Pacific County, one of the
poorest in the State, is also the home of about 500 other American Indian tribal members, with
various other affiliations which include the Quinault, Quileute, Hoh, Chehalis, Makah, and other
Pacific Northwest tribes. The Shoalwaters have historically sought to interact closely with their
coastal ocean environment, and derive much of their subsistence and livelihood from activities
which embrace and enhance natural resource utilization in the dynamic and productive Willapa
Bay ecosystem.
1.2 Major Problems with Reproductive Health Outcomes: High Infant Mortality:
Epidemiologic Studies Culminating with the "Joint Report" of the Shoalwater Bay
Emergency
On July 7, 1992, news first emerged of an unusually high infant mortality rate among the SB IT
(1),(2),(3). On that date, the Shoalwater Bay Tribal Council (SBTC) declared a health emergency
on the reservation, due to a "high pre-natal and neonatal infant mortality rate, which may exceed
90 percent (%) for the last two years".
Following this announcement, a joint epidemiologic examination of adverse reproductive
outcomes on the Reservation from 1982-1992 was initiated by the Portland Area Indian Health
Service (IHS) and the State of Washington Department of Health (DOH) (2).
The preliminary draft report of this effort was then presented to the SBTC in October, 1993. By
this time, the problem had expanded in scope as the research revealed various other chronic health
problems among the Tribal population.
The controversial nature of such a topic met with strong perceptions and reactions among
members of the Tribal community. This resulted in the Tribal Council recommending that the
draft study be subjected to independent, outside scientific review. The Tribe asked three specific
reproductive health scientists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to
review the draft and suggest changes.
Through these efforts, the Washington State DOH and IHS preliminary report (2) was drafted
into a more comprehensive and refined "Joint Report" (3), which incorporated changes suggested
by reviewers, analysis of needs by the Advisory Committee, and perceptions and reactions by
community members. The Advisory Committee reviewed and approved this Joint Report,
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 1 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
• -., Grays Harbor
Westporf
1
3
Miles
Figure 1. Location of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation and project sample stations,
Revision3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 2 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited.Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
and it was also reviewed and approved by the SBTC on October 27, 1994. The final Joint
Report, summarizing what was known about the Tribe's pregnancy and infant mortality
emergency situation, was thus a joint effort of the SBTC, the Washington State DOH, and the
ms.
1.3 Findings of the Final Joint Report
The results of this Final Joint Shoalwater Bay Report were released in December of 1994 (3).
The data corroborated Tribal concerns about high rates of on-reservation adverse reproductive
health outcomes. Of nineteen on-reservation pregnancies identified for the Tribe between 1988
and 1992, only nine infants (47%) survived their first year of life. Statistically, the ten adverse
outcomes /infant mortalities included three ectopic pregnancies (16%), three miscarriages (16%),
two stillbirths (11%), and two infants (11%) who died before reaching their first birthdays.
Although the rates were based on small numbers, the severity of the problem of adverse outcomes
of the on-reservation pregnancies between 1988 and 1992 can be roughly compared against the
"expected" rates for Washington State as follows:
• The rate of stillbirths was 29 times the "expected" rate.
• The infant mortality rate was 24 times the "expected" rate.
• The rate of ectopic pregnancy for the Tribe was 10 times the "expected" rate.
• The rate of miscarriage was 1.2 times the "expected" rate.
1.4 Historically Inadequate Access to Health Care
The general health care situation for Native Americans is bureaucratically complex, highly
compartmentalized, and often somewhat bleak. The IHS serves via its Portland office about
130,000 American Indians in Washington, Idaho, and Oregon, but receives congressional funds to
support only 60% of tribal medical needs (1). There is thus a chronic limitation of adequate
health facilities and care, and a corresponding limit on a given tribe's ability to plan and develop
appropriate prevention programs. The IHS is also a "payer of last resort", which means that
most of the time, the Shoalwaters have had to vacillate between state and federal government to
receive health care. For the SBIT, such bureaucratic fragmentation meant that some of the health
data for the Tribe was received by Medicare and some by MS, leaving neither agency with a clear
picture of the actual health crisis (1). The Final Joint Report noted that for the Shoalwaters, there
was a "difference of access" to "a broad-based... delivery of personal and public medical and
health care, and... community-based health promotion programs". Access to health care was
identified as a major problem (even the major problem) (3).
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 3 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Until the completion of their own modern on-site health clinic in 1995 (financed in part via a
$250,000 annual grant from Congress and a $100,000 grant from the IHS), yet another problem
for the Shoalwaters had been the necessity to drive northward about eighty five miles each way to
the Taholah Clinic, which was the IHS-designated clinic for that service area. Once at Taholah,
ffistoricTintertribal socio-political barriers madeUfioalwater accessTxTheafth services difficult
1.5 Formation of the Shoalwater Bay Health Concerns Advisory Committee (May, 1994)
Along with the funding efforts and research initiatives outlined above, a special committee of
medical, epidemiological, health care and environmental professionals was convened in Seattle on
May 3, 1994. The function of this committee is to continually review and evaluate data and
information relative to the Shearwater's health crisis, and to advise and assist the SBIT in
conducting health assessments, environmental testing, and educational outreach. The Committee
meets quarterly, examines current issues and health /environmental data, and makes
recommendations to Tribal leadership and management, including the five member Shoalwater
Bay Tribal Health Board.
Members currently appointed to the Shoalwater Bay Health Concerns Advisory Committee are
listed in Appendix A.
1.6 The Shoalwater Bay Tribal Health Board
To deal with this health emergency, and other health-based issues, the SBIT also relies heavily on
its own internal Health Board. Members of the Health Board are frequent observers during the
formal meetings of the Health Concerns Advisory Committee and are kept closely informed of the
Committee's decisions and recommendations. Members currently appointed to the Shoalwater
Bay Tribal Health Board are listed in Appendix B.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 4of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 Possible Environmental Risk Factors: A Prelude to EPA's Involvement
The Joint Report did not reveal the existence or likelihood of any environmental "smoking gun".
While the number of pregnancies investigated was too small to adequately assess environmental
exposure, conclusions and recommendations of the Joint Report did, however, raise the possibility
that environmental factors could play a role in the infant mortality problems experienced by the
Tribe.
Many environmental risk factors are known to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes,
including miscarriages. The original epidemiologic study by JJHS and the Washington State DOH
did not conduct environmental testing, but did ask Tribal respondents about a large number of
variables potentially associated with environmental exposures. These included exposures from
diet, drinking water sources (e.g., the main well which serves the Reservation), frequency of
consuming locally harvested seafood, occupation (including maternal and paternal job exposures
in local industries), and other sources such as exposure to pesticides, exposure to toxic substances
through hobbies, etc. The frequencies of such exposures were similar among women with and
without adverse outcomes. The original study did not do environmental tests for exposure to
possible airborne, waterborne, or food borne toxins, or to toxins unknown to the women surveyed
Based on these uncertainties, the Report recommended that in addition to immediate and broad
efforts to improve the quantity and quality of comprehensive health care, delivery of health care,
and community health promotion, that "prudent environmental risk assessments and studies based
on routes of exposure be conducted and collated with health assessments of tribal members".
This EPA report is one element of the environmental risk assessment.
2.2 EPA Undertakes a Preliminary Environmental Study
By December 1994, public and news media attention had focused intently on the plight of the
Tribe (4),(5),(6), further underscoring the need to obtain baseline screening data on possible
environmental contaminants and exposure pathways in the area which might somehow be relevant
to the Shoalwater Bay health crisis.
Since first becoming aware of the problem in 1993, EPA Region 10 had shared the Tribe's
concerns. To respond to the concern that current environmental contaminants might be adversely
impacting the health of the people of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribal Community, EPA
Regional Administrator Chuck Clarke met with Chairman Herbert Mark Whitish at the
Shoalwater Bay Tribal Headquarters on June 2, 1994. At that meeting, Administrator Clarke
committed to a limited, but highly focused preliminary screening study to help explore the
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 5 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
possibility that Tribal exposure to various environmental stressors in the Shoalwater Bay
ecosystem might somehow be related to these health and reproductive problems.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 6of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 3.0 SCOPE AND DESIGN OF EPA STUDY
The EPA investigation of four possible environmental pathways which might influence infant
mortality and reproductive success was designed as a preliminary screening study, involving the
relatively intense and specific investigation of targeted chemical residues in a small number of
carefully chosen samples, from these exposure pathways.
Because funding for this screening effort was limited, the EPA study conducted no formal
exposure modeling. Likewise, the intense investigation of a small number of environmental
samples precluded a more "statistical" sampling design (involving many sample points, and
correspondingly greater labor and expense). Rather than focusing on a large number of samples
and analyzing in rote fashion for the more easily obtained, common environmental analytes, the
EPA study went well beyond this approach in the laboratory, choosing instead to concentrate on
specific and carefully selected analytes in a relatively few carefully chosen environmental samples.
3.1 Drainage From the Nearby Dump Site
For several years, the Shoalwater Bay Tribe had been concerned about the possibility of chemical
exposure to their lands via drainage from an abandoned dump site (see Figure 2). This dump is
located just inland from the tideflats across State Route (SR) 105, approximately two miles west-
north-west of the Tribal Headquarters, and drains seaward via a series of small ravines and
rivulets which drain this hillside area. The dump site and associated landfill had apparently not
been fully characterized in terms of actual use history, and contents. The Tribe, which derives
much of their subsistence on locally obtained fish and shellfish, was concerned about potential
contamination from this dump significantly impacting the aquatic ecosystem immediately
downstream.
For these reasons, it was decided to examine the lower leachate stream from this station for
chemical contaminants. The Tribe was especially concerned about heavy metal contamination,
munitions compounds, and antifouling paints which might have been dumped there.
The major surface leachate drainage from the dump site proceeds seaward via a small, year-round
rivulet which runs along the base of the wooded ravine adjoining the dump. Flowing through a
culvert under SR 105, the rivulet then drains to the upper intertidal area through a brackish
slough. Drainage may flow directly to the tideflats during high tidal conditions, or indirectly by
seepage through a salt marsh during low water conditions.
Revision 3.0, January 77, 1997 Page: 7of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
crajibe/ry drainage
' .-; dump site -, \ •'. '•;&,';,;;?;;&
0 0,4 0.8
Miles
Figure 2. Sample stations in the drainage from the dump site and cranberry bogs near the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation.
Revision 3. 0, January 1 7, 1997 Page: 8 of 89
-------
The Shoatwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
3.1.1 Number and Type of Samples Taken
A total of five samples (Stations #1 - 5, Figure 2) were taken from along the dump site area
drainage. These included three sediment and two water samples. One sediment sample was taken
from an area of leachate discharging from thlTbase offhlTdump, midway up the ravine. A second
sediment sample was taken from the stream about 70 feet uphill from SR 105 and after the stream
traversed the bottom area of the dump. A third sediment sample was taken from the slough
across SR 105, which is the terminus of the drainage from the dump site. Two water samples
were also obtained. These were taken at the same stations as the two sediment samples
previously described from the mid and lower parts of the dump-ravine runoff. No concomitant
water samples were taken from the supratidal slough area below the road.
3.1.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern
• Full target compound list (TCL) of organics and pesticides, and the target analyte list
(TAL) of metals were measured.
• Also the following ordnance compounds:
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT)
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine(RDX)
propylene glycol dinitrate (PGDN)
• Specific metals and organometals:
tributyltin (and total tin)
methylmercury
beryllium
Detection Limit for Sediment: 100 ug/kg
3.1.3 Water Analytes of Concern
Analytes were identical to those listed above for sediment, but with the inclusion of major anions .
(chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and alkalinity), and nutrients (nitrate + nitrite, ammonia, and total
phosphorus).
Detection limits for water: 10 ug/1. except
tributyltin; 1 ug/1
beryllium; 4 ug/1
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 9 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
3.2 Agricultural Runoff from Cranberry Bogs, Forestry, and Other Sources
The second area of EPA's concern about possible environmental contamination of the immediate
Shoalwater Bay ecosystem focused on the general issue of pesticides from nearby agricultural
sources. Immediately northrand^wesTof tfie^Shoalwater Bay~Trib~allands are areas of intense
cranberry culture, as well as various types of forestry and other agricultural endeavors, both
public and private. Approximately 800 acres are cultivated for growing cranberries in the near
coastal area between Grays Harbor and Willapa Bay (7). Cranberries are grown in bogs, and
spend nearly all of their growth cycle in saturated soil. Many pesticides are applied to these
cranberry bogs, to control various pests and diseases which hinder crop production. On the
Northwest Pacific Coast, rain and moist climates assure the transport of these pesticides offsite,
from the bogs and from the forests adjoining them, via surface water drainage to Willapa Bay.
Agricultural chemicals which are used in or near wetland areas are especially difficult to contain
on site, even under best management practices and ideal situations. Cranberries in particular are a
"minor use crop", and consequently there are few commercial pesticides registered and designed
especially for cranberry farming. Thus, cranberry growers must frequently seek permission to
apply new pesticides under special or experimental registration permits issued from the State
Department of Agriculture, responsible for administering and enforcing the EPA Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FEFRA), which regulates the registration and use of
all pesticide products. Knowing this, and knowing that numerous pesticides are legally applied to
the bogs during the growing season, samples were collected during the summer peak application
period.
For the EPA sampling effort, it was decided to focus on a major drainage stream emerging from a
very large area of numerous cranberry bogs, located just between the coastal forest and SR 105,
about two miles northwest of Tribal Headquarters (Figure 2.). After leaving the bogs, the stream
proceeds southward between SR 105 and the ocean, and finally discharges to Willapa Bay at a
point about a mile northwest of the Tribal Headquarters. For screening purposes, the samples
were taken under what were perceived as "worst case" conditions; i.e., during the summer period
of greatest pesticide application, and at stations specifically chosen to reflect areas of high
pesticide loading as a consequence of upstream agriculture practices. Concomitant samples of
sediment and water were taken at two points along a common drainage stream exiting a major
bog area, as it made its mile-long progression to the nearby tidelands. .
3.2.1 Numbers and Types of Samples Taken
A total of four samples were taken from the area draining this intense agricultural area (Stations
#6-9, Figure 2). These consisted of two sediment and two water samples from the overlying
water column. One set of samples was taken just north of SR 105, where the stream exits nearby
cranberry bog properties. The second set of samples was obtained about one half mile
downstream, where the stream becomes tidally influenced, and about one quarter mile onto the
intertidal shoreline.
Because these samples targeted the most likely conditions for agricultural pesticide contamination,
chemical analyses were directed toward on a suite of carefully chosen pesticide residues likely to
be used in such endeavors as cranberry culture, forestry, and general agriculture.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 10of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
3.2.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern
• Full pesticides screen, including the organochlorine and organophosphate series.
Also, special emphasis was placed on certain analytes associated wfth cranberry bogs and
forestry areas, to specifically include the following:
esfenvalerate
chlorpyrifos
azinphos-methyl
dimethoate
phosmet
diazinon
malathion
carbofuran
endosulfan
carbaryl
1-naphthol
acephate ,/"
mancozeb
ferbam
chlorothalonil
2,4-D
Dichlobenil
simazine
hydroxysimazine
atrazine
diuron
pronamide
glyphosate
hexazinone
dalapon
norflurazon
napropamide
pentachlorophenol, (PCP)
Metals
total lead
total mercury
arsenic
Detection Limits for Sediment: 100 ua/kg
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 11 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
3.2.3 Water Analytes of Concern
As above for sediment, with the inclusion of
"• Metals, anions, and nutrients as outlined for surface waters taken from the dump
pathway described previously.
Detection Limits for Water: 10 ug/1
3.3 Tideflat Sediment in the Vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribal Lands (See
Figure 3)
The possibility of chemical pollutants in the tidelands near the Reservation has long been a
concern of area residents. These concerns are well-founded. Although the Willapa Bay
ecosystem is a dynamic and well-flushed estuary, its wealth of natural resources are sought after,
and managed, by an increasingly greater and complex array of various private and public interests.
Accordingly, there are numerous known sources of xenobiotic contaminants which conceivably
can enter areas where subsistence on local fish and shellfish is important to local residents.
For example, considerable portions of the tidelands adjacent to the Shoalwaters have historically
been sprayed each year with the pesticide, carbaryl. Applied under a special State permit, carbaryl
controls the populations of ghost shrimp, of the genera Neotrypaea (formerly Callianassd) and
Upogebia, which interfere with oyster production because their burrowing activities can bury or
smother oysters (8). Also, herbicides such as glyphosate are applied in certain areas of the Bay,
to control invasive stands of the non-native seagrass, Spartina. There is also considerable local
concern about herbicides and other pesticides entering the Bay from roadside applications around
its periphery, from forestry operations in the area, and from other agricultural runoff in the region.
Possible contamination from the Columbia River is another source of concern. The Columbia,
laden with agricultural and industrial pollutants pours into the Pacific fifty miles down the coast.
The Tribe contends that the Columbia River Gyre, a vast eddy driven northward along the coast
in its clockwise Coreolis rotation, dumps a significant portion of this pollutant load directly into
their portion of Willapa Bay.
For these reasons, it was decided to select a small number of carefully chosen sediment samples
from the tidelands adjacent to the Tribal lands, and analyze them extensively for possible chemical
residues. At this preliminary stage, only sediments were sampled and analyzed; no samples of
benthic biota were taken.
3.3.1 Number and Types of Samples Taken
A total of five sediment samples were obtained from preselected representative areas of the
inshore tidelands of Willapa Bay (Stations #10-14, Figure 3). Results of the initial sampling
prompted the collection of a similar sediment sample from Grays Harbor, a separate,
hydrogeologically similar estuary to the north, for purposes of comparison (Station #23, Figure
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 12 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
/. /. '/.:V
CedcfefVR LVBI
•'!/ -V/,X '
Iv-/
M
;v
/K
SBIl
'^",^^
"^ ' * ^^^^;-;,; ,y&-,;'/;h''- , x";'"
fV< v . ;- v -^VS-'/;'--; - * ' • - .
^rozoMH
Bdf> - -
;\
L'eadbel'ter Point
El len Sands
0 0.5 1 1.5
Figure 3. Tideflats sample stations in the vicinity of the Shoaiwater Bay Indian Reservation (SBIR)
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 13 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
1). Specific details about the sampling stations and results of analysis are outlined in later sections
of this report.
3.3.2 Sediment Analytes of Concern
• Full TCL organics and TAL inorganics, including metals, routine pesticides (including
organophosphate and organochlorine screen), organics. Detection limits: 100 ^ig/kg.
• The following metals and organometals:
total lead
total mercury
arsenic
tributyltin (and total tin)
methylmercury (and total mercury)
• Glyphosate
• Special pesticide screen, to include:
esfenvalerate
chlorpyrifos
azinphos-methyl
dimethoate
phosmet
diazinon
malathion
carbofuran
endosulfan
carbaryl
1-naphthol
acephate
mancozeb
ferbam
chlorothalonil
2,4-D
dichlobenil
simazine
hydroxysimazine
atrazine
diuron
pronamide
glyphosate
hexazinone
dalapon
norflurazon
napropamide
PCP
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 14 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Detection Limits. Sediment: 100 ug/kg
3.3.3 Microbiological Screening: Two Intertidal Water Samples
Recently, there has been a concern that fecal contamination from failing septic drainfield systems
may be leaking onto the beach in the vicinity of the tribal "swimming hole". EPA evaluated two
intertidal water samples for fecal coliforms, enterococci, E. coli., and Pseudomonas aentginosa
concentration. Samples were obtained during an incoming tide. One sample (Dexter-by-the-Sea;
see Figure 4) was chosen as the station nearest the actual swimming hole. The second sample
was located north of the swimming hole and at a station of potential fecal contamination.
3.4 Drinking Water Stations in the Vicinity of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation
As part of this EPA preliminary screening study, a drinking water survey of selected on- and off-
reservation water system taps was conducted in October 1995. The intent of the sampling event
was twofold. The first goal was to screen drinking water for bacteria, lead, or other inorganic
contaminants. The second goal was to provide the Tribe additional information useful for
designing a more comprehensive drinking water investigation. The drinking water sampling event
supplements earlier work, including a 1993 EPA analysis of synthetic organic compounds in the
main tribal water-supply well (9),(10),(H).
Contaminants in drinking water can originate in the water source (such as ground water or surface
water), in the distribution system between the source and the residence, and in the residence
distribution system. Most residences and community buildings were sampled for bacteria and
lead, because these parameters are more likely to vary as a result of conditions in and around the
distribution systems. For example, lead can originate from leaded pipes, solder or packing.
Bacterial contamination can originate by infiltration from failing septic drainfields or some other
bacterial source into the distribution pipes. A fewer number of stations, but still sufficient to
include most water sources used by tribal members, were sampled for complete inorganics
(metals, anions, and nutrients). Inorganic parameters other than lead are likely to vary as a result
of conditions in the different ground water or surface water sources rather than in the distribution
systems.
The study area for the survey encompassed tribal residences and community or business stations
on the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation and in or near Dexter-By-The-Sea, Ocosta, Westport,
Grayland, South Bend and Bay Center. The water sources that serve these distribution systems
are listed in Table 1. In all, 42 stations were sampled for one or more of three suites of
parameters: bacteria, lead, or complete inorganics. Of the 42 stations, 36 stations were sampled
for bacteria, 32 stations for lead, and 19 stations for complete inorganics.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 15 of89
-------
12
Miles
Figured. Sample stations for drinking water survay, Outlying sites are numbered;
see Figures 1 and 8 tor detail near the reservation.
Revision 3.0, Janumy 17, 1997
Page: 16 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 1. Sources of Drinking Water Samples
Water Source
Main Reservation Well
Annex Well
Dexter-By-The-Sea Community Well
Toke Point Well
Grayland Community Well
Westport Community Well
Private Wells
Private Well
Surface Water Community Source
Service Location
Most Reservation Buildings
Annex Buildings
Buildings Near East Boundary
Horse Pasture
Grayland Residences
Westport Residence
Ocosta Residences
Bay Center Business
South Bend Residence
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 17 of 89
-------
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Chapter 4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND METHODOLOGIES
This field screening study involved: (1) sediment, water, and microbiological samples at an
abandoned solid waste disposal site; (2) sediment and microbiological samples from a water
recreation area; (3) a reference sediment sample from South Bay in Grays Harbor; (4) sediment
and water samples in a drainage ditch from a cranberry growing area; (5) sediment, water, or
microbiological samples in five shellfish harvesting areas in Willapa Bay; and (6) a drinking water
survey. Sediment, water, drinking water and tissue samples were collected and analyzed for a
variety of organic, inorganic, trace metals and microbiological parameters depending on the
potential threat from the pathway in question. The location of the sample stations, other than the
drinking water samples, in and near the Reservation is shown in Figures 1-3. The location of
drinking water samples is shown in Figures 4-6.
The abandoned solid waste disposal site is located on the west side of an unnamed stream that
enters North Cove on the west side of the reservation. The site is on the side of a low hill and
starts about 1/4 mile north of SR 105, and extends about 1/4 mile north along the right bank of
the stream. Debris from the dump is scattered throughout the flood plain and is also in the active
flowing stream.
The water recreation area is located on the Reservation just north of the new tribal center and
close to a housing area. It is referred to as a swimming hole, but swimming is only possible at
high tide. However, this area is sometimes used for wading by young children during low tide.
The Reservation hardshell clam bed is located about 1/4 mile to the south of the swimming hole.
The drainage ditch from the cranberry growing region enters Willapa Bay just west of North
Cove. The ditch is nearly 5 miles long and drains cranberry bogs located south of the
Pacific/Grays Harbor County line.
The five most commonly used shellfish harvesting areas are: (1) commercial oyster beds on the
south side of the Willapa River Channel and north of Stony Point, (2) the Hawks Point hardshell
clam beds, (3) an oyster bed located on the west side of the Cedar River channel, (4) a hardshell
clam bed on the Reservation, and (5) a razor clam beach at North Cove.
The drinking water sampling event was conducted primarily at residences on the reservation, but
also included off-reservation tribal members' residences in nearby communities of Dexter-By-The-
Sea, Grayland, Westport, Ocosta, and South Bend. Samples for the drinking water survey were
also collected from two tribal wells and from the Shoalwater Bay Oyster Company near Bay
Center.
4.1 Sample Collection
The location, media, analysis required, sample type, and the sampling dates for the water and
sediment samples are listed in Table 2. Similar information is shown on Tables 3 and 4,
respectively, for the microbiological and drinking water samples.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 18 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Resei-vation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Shoolwater Bay India-n-JL^servat
Q 0.2 0.4
Miles
FigureS". Sample stations for drinking water survey in the vicinity of fhe Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservati
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
on
Page: 19 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Figure 6. Sample stations for drinking water survey at the Shoalwater Bay Indian
Reservation. Not to scale; area shown is approximately one mile across.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
'35
Page: 20 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 2. List of Sediment and Surface Water Samples1
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
11
12
12A
13
14
23
EPA
Sample
Number
95080025
95080026
95080023
95080024
95080021
95240100
95240101
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
95240106
95240107
95240111
95240110
95240109
95240108
94334301
94334302
94334303
95080022
94334304
94334300
95080020
Location
Dump Site
Dump Site, Leachate
FW Stream, Below Dump Site
FW Stream, Below Dump Site
Estuary, Upper Beach Lagoon
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Upper Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Willapa Bay, Oyster Bed
Willapa Bay, Oyster Bed
SBIR, Swimming Hole
SBIR, Swimming Hole
Hawks Pt, Shellfish Area
Willapa Bay, Ellen Sands
Grays Harbor, South Bay
Media
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Analysis
Required
Org, TOG & Metals
Organics & Metals
Org, TOG & Metals
Organics & Metals
Org, TOC & Metals
Metals
Organics
Pesticides/PCBs
Ans/Cats/N utrients
Herbicides
Metals
Metals
Organics
Ans/Cats/Nutrients
Herbicides
Pesticides/PCBs
Metals
Organics & Metals
Organics & Metals
Organics & Metals
Org, TOC & Metals
Organics & Metals
Organics & Metals
Org, TOC & Metals
Date
Sampled
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
06-13-95
08-19-94
08-19-94
08-19-94
02-22-95
08-19-94
08-19-94
02-21-95
-
#
1 - All samples were grab samples.
Revision 3,0, January 17,1997
Page: 21 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
Table 3. List of Microbiology Samples1
Station
Number
12
12
15
16
16
17
17
18A
18A
18B
18B
EPA
Sample
94350125
94350126
95080031
95080032
95080030
95200021
95200020
95200025
95200024
95200023
95200022
Location
SBIR, Swimming Hole,
near Dexter-by-the-Sea
SBIR, Swimming Hole,
near Davis House
Dump Site Leachate
FW Stream, Above Dump Site
FW Stream, Below Dump Site
Tideflat near Cedar River, Oyster Bed
Cedar River on Tideflat
SBIR, Shellfish Harvesting Area
Pooled Water on Tideflat
Willapa Bay, North Cove Beach
Nearshore Willapa Bay
Media
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Oyster Tissue
Water
Littleneck Tissue
Water
Razor Clam Tissue
Water
Date
Sampled
08-29-94
08-29-94
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
05-18-95
05-18-95
05-18-95
05-18-95
05-18-95
05-18-95
1 - All samples were grab samples.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 22 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 4. List of Drinking Water Samples Collected in October, 1995.
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
. 5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
28
31
32
33
34
35
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Location
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-center
Reservation-center
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Westport
Westport
Grayland
Reservation-Dexter
Reservation-Dexter
Reservation-Dexter
Reservation-east
Reservation-annex
Reservation-annex
Ocosta
Ocosta
Ocosta
South Bend
Bay Center
Reservation-east
Westport
Reservation-center
Tokeland
Reservation-
Tokeland
Reservation-annex
transfer blank
transfer blank
EPA Sample
Number
Date
Sampled
Time,
(pst)
inorganics
95430508
95430501
95430503
95430502
95430520
95430516
95430517
95430500
95430507
95430504
95430505
95430509
95430510
95430511
95430514
95430515
95430518
95430512
95430506
95430513
95430519
95430521
951023
951023
951023
951024
951024
951024
951024
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951024
951024
951024
951023
951023
951024
951024
951024
1440
1225
1330
1245
1450
1200
1202
1150
1415
1323
1320
1535
1615
1635
1010
1045
1225
1705
1345
715
1300
1450
EPA
Sample
Number
Date
Sampled
Time
(pst)
Lead
95430559
95430557
95430539
95430561
95430534
95430537
95430550
95430545
95430530
95430531
95430532
95430536
95430556
95430549
95430560
95430538
.95430540
95430546
95430548
95430547
95430558
95430552
95430533
95430535
95430551
95430542
95430543
95430554
95430555
95430544
95430553
95430541
951030
951028
951023
951025
951023
951023
951023
951024
951023
951023
951023
951023
951027
951024
951025
951023
951023
951024
951024
951024
951029
951024
951023
951023
951024
951024
951023
951023
951023
951024
951024
951023
am
am
am
am
am
900
am
600
am
am
am
640
am
545
am
715
605
am
700
am
am
530
am
am
am
am
1220
EPA
Sample
Number
Date
Sampled
Time
(pst)
Microbiology
95430603
95430604
95430605
95430606
95430607
95430608
95430609
95430610
9543061 1
95430612
95430613
95430614
95430617
95430618
95430619
95430620
95430621
95430622
95430623
95430625
95430626
95430624
95430627
95430631
95430633
95430634
95430601
95430600
95430602
95430616
95430615
95430630
95430628
95430629
95430635
95430632
annex well
95430636
95430637
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023^
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951024
951024
951024
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951023
951024
951024
951023
951024
1200
1210
1216
1223
1230
1234
1242
1250
1302
1305
1310
1330
1510
1520
1535
1530
1545
1600
1620
1640
1650
1635
1700
850
945
1015
1135
1125
1146
1500
1450
1820
1750
1800
1120
915
2020
1135
|
-
«
'
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 23 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
All samples were transported in insulated coolers containing crushed ice and analyzed at the EPA
Manchester Laboratory. These samples were transported, stored, and analyzed according to
specifications of the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
4.1.1 Sediment
Surface sediment was collected either with a precleaned stainless steel spoon or, for some of the
water areas, with a precleaned Ekman dredge (dimensions 6"x6"x9" deep). The Ekman dredge
was thoroughly brushed and rinsed with on-site and deionized water between samples. An
attempt was made to sample the top six inches of sediment, but at some stations this was not
possible due to the sediment type (clay, root masses, or soft substrates) or due to visual
limitations when sampling below water with the Ekman dredge. When the Ekman dredge was
used for sampling, sediment was removed from the dredge with a precleaned stainless steel spoon.
Only sediment not touching either the sides or the bottom of the dredge was collected for
analysis.
For the estuarine sediment samples above water, a clear plastic core (10 cm in diameter by 20 to
25 cm long) was taken adjacent to each sample station to obtain a field description of the
substrate, i.e., color, stratification, organic material and odor. Sediment from the descriptive
cores was not sampled for analysis.
Sampled sediment was initially placed in precleaned 1-gallon jars. The jars were filled
approximately two-thirds full and mixed to an even color and consistency with a precleaned
stainless steel spoon. Mixed sediment from these containers was then placed in separate
precleaned jars for the required analyses at that station and for providing split samples for the
Tribe's Environmental Program.
4.1.2 Water
4.1.2.1 Surface Water
The surface water samples were taken in precleaned glass jars or cubitainers appropriate for the
analysis required. The containers were filled with water at each station either by direct immersion
under the surface or with a precleaned 8-oz jar used as a ladle for filling larger containers. Any
surface debris (e.g., floating algae, leaves, twigs, etc.) was brushed aside during sampling.
Separate water samples were taken for the Tribe.
Field parameters (pH, conductivity, and temperature) were measured at the time of sampling. In
addition, a conductivity survey was made of the stream adjacent to the dump site. The purpose of
the survey was to measure conductivity variations that would indicate an increase in dissolved
solids resulting from seepage from the base of the dump into the stream.
4.1.2.2 Drinking Water
Three groups of samples were collected for the drinking water sampling event (Table 4): first-
pour samples for lead analysis, flushed samples for complete inorganics, and flushed samples for
microbiology. Microbiological methods are described below.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 24 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
First-pour samples for lead analysis (Table 4) were collected from 32 stations by residents using
500-ml polyethylene cubitainers. Residents were provided a written protocol for collecting a
sample early in the day from a tap commonly used for drinking water, generally the kitchen tap.
The protocol specified collecting water prior to any other water use for the day to ensure that the
sample was worst-case in terms of prolonged stagnation time irThousefiold^pipes. The residents
delivered their samples to a central receiving point during October 23-24, 1995, at which time
field pH and conductivity were measured and the sample was preserved. Five of the samples were
collected after the field survey and were subsequently mailed to the laboratory.
Flushed samples for complete inorganic analyses (Table 4) were collected from 20 stations by an
EPA team. These samples were collected in polyethylene cubitainers after purging the tap for at
least one minute. Field parameters (pH, conductivity, and temperature) were measured at the
time of sampling, and samples were immediately preserved for metals analysis. Since the flushed
samples were collected later in the day after a period of normal water use, the sample water
should have had minimal residence time in the household pipes, and should have been more
representative of water from the outside distribution system. In addition to building taps, samples
were collected from two well heads: the main tribal water-supply well and a tribal well near Toke
Point (Figure 5).
In order to test field conditions during the drinking water sampling event, a duplicate QA sample
was collected at one station. In addition, a transfer blank was also collected at one station, for
which laboratory- prepared deionized water was transferred in the field from one bottle to
another.
4.1.3 Microbiology
4.1.3.1 Field Methods
All bacteriological samples of freshwater, seawater and leachate seep water were collected
according to EPA and American Public Health Association (APHA) methods (12),(13),(14),(15)
using sterile 250 ml or 500 ml polypropylene bottles containing the appropriate preservative.
Leachate seeps and freshwater from the dump site were collected in bottles containing a chelating
agent (0.3 ml of a 15% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) 7125 ml sample volume). All
other freshwater samples, including drinking water, were collected in bottles containing a
dechlorinating agent (0.1 ml of a 10% sodium thiosulfate solution/125 ml sample volume).
Shellfish samples consisting of Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas), Japanese littleneck clams
(Tapes japonicd) and razor clams (Siliqua patuld) were collected according to APHA shellfish
procedures (13) in sterile plastic bags. Ambient estuarine surface water was collected near each
shellfish bed by immersing a polypropylene bottle below the water surface.
Freshwater, leachate, shellfish and seawater samples were examined within eight hours of
collection, and the drinking water samples were examined within 30 hours of collection.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 25 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
4.1.3.2 Laboratory Methods
Drinking water samples were analyzed by the membrane filter method following EPA criteria (12)
for the enumeration of total coliforms, fecal coliforms and E. coli. All other samples, including
lihellfislTtissue, were examinedUsing thelfive-tube, multiple^iluTioirJ^NTtieTho^^utlmedirfbotlr
Standard Methods (15) and APHA shellfish procedures (13). Enterococci were determined by
the same MPN procedure as described above using azide-dextrose broth for presumptive growth
and Enterococcosel® Agar for confirmation as described in Standard Methods (12). All final
counts for total coliforms, fecal coliforms, E. coli and enterococci were based on a per 100 ml/gm
basis.
Samples of leachate and freshwater from the dump site were examined by the heterotrophic plate
count (HPC) and sulfite polymyxin sulfadiazine (SPS) aerobic/anaerobic procedure developed by
the EPA Manchester Laboratory (16). All final counts of HPC and SPS were expressed on a 1 ml
or 1 gm basis.
4.2 Station Locations by Global Positioning System
The position of each station was determined by using a global positioning system (GPS) in the
autonomous (non-differentially corrected) mode. The positions of all stations, except for stations
10, 11, 13 and 14, were post-processed to obtain final positions accurate to within ± 3 meters.
Due to limited sampling time, position files were not recorded for stations 10, 11, 13 and 14.
Further, in some other cases, e.g., stations 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9, the recorded position was some
distance away from the station location, which was under a canopy of vegetation. The post-
processed and uncorrected GPS station positions are listed in Appendix H, Table H-l.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 26of 89
-------
-------
The Shoal-water Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) requirements for the project were specified in two
QAPPs (17),(18). For preparation of this report, each QAPP was reviewed in order to determine
if project objectives and project data quality objectives had been met.
5.1 Project Objectives and Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
The above referenced QAPPs state the following project objective:
• Conduct a Preliminary Field Screening Study to:
1) Evaluate a broad spectrum of organics, pesticides, and trace metals in selected
sediment and water samples,
2) Evaluate microbiological contamination of water and shellfish near the
Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation, and,
3) Evaluate bacteria, metals, and other inorganic contaminants in on- and off-
reservation household drinking water systems.
The study area for the screening project includes a drainage pathway from a former dump site, an
intertidal recreational swimming hole, intertidal areas where shellfish are collected as food, oyster
beds recently treated with carbaryl, estuarine reference areas in Willapa Bay, a drainage pathway
from cranberry bogs, and household drinking water on- and off-reservation and Grays Harbor.
The DQOs of the preliminary field screening study were to collect documented, representative
samples using a minimum number of resource-intensive QA oversight samples. Transfer blanks
were collected for cation, anion, nutrient, and microbiological measurements of drinking water
samples. Trip blanks were collected for volatile organics compound (VOC) measurements. A
pair of blind field duplicate drinking water samples were collected for the measurement of metals,
cations, anions, and nutrients in drinking water samples (see Appendix E, Table E-21). The
average percent difference (precision) of the two blind field duplicate drinking water samples for
26 metals was 2 %. Five project samples were measured in duplicate by the laboratory for metals,
cations, anions, and nutrients (see Appendix E, Tables E-22 to E-24). In addition, the QAPPs
required that the laboratory meet the QA and QC requirements which are specified in each
analytical method.
Finally, QAPP objectives required that all project data be validated using EPA data quality
assessment guidelines to determine if each measurement met the QA and QC requirements of both
the QAPPs and the analytical method. The result of this data validation process was the
assignment of data qualifiers to selected project measurement values. Tables 5-17 show
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 27of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
measurement results for target compounds which were reported to be above the lower
quantitation limit of the sample. Tables C-l to C-6 in Appendix C show the list of target
compounds which were not measured in samples above the lower quantitation limit of the sample.
The major use of the data for this limited, screening^tudy, islo provide a basis for the
determination of a need of future environmental investigations, and to assist in the design of such
investigations.
5.2 QA/QC Samples
Specific transfer blanks, trip blanks, and field duplicates were collected in order to demonstrate
the integrity and precision of specific project samples.
Project DQOs required that all quality control (QC) requirements for the measurement of all
project samples meet the stated QC specifications of each analytical method. These analytical
methods required that the laboratory measure method blanks, matrix spike (MS) samples
(inorganics), matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples (organics), and sterility
controls on transport/transfer blanks, dilution water blanks, media agar and broth blanks, and
positive and negative control samples for microbiological measurements to ensure that results
were within QC limits for each method. The laboratory also demonstrated laboratory precision by
measuring duplicates of project samples.
All QA and QC data from the measurement of both field and laboratory samples were used in
assessing the quality of project data (see Appendixes D and E). Any project data which did not
meet the stated requirements of the QAPPs or analytical method was qualified with appropriate
data quality flags (see Appendixes F and G).
For organics data in this Report, the associated numerical value next to a "U" or "UJ" qualifier is
the sample quantitation limit (SQL), which is based upon the lowest calibration point of the 5-
point initial calibration curve and any dilutions which were made to the sample due to high
concentrations or matrix effects. For metals and.inorganic data in this Report, the associated
numerical value next to a "U" or "UJ" qualifier is the method detection limit (MDL) for the
sample, which is defined in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B.
5.3 Validation of Project Data
Project data were validated by the EPA Region 10 Laboratory. National EPA data validation
guidelines were used to determine the quality of organics data (19),(20) and inorganics data
5.4 Results from the Validation of Project Data
Using the objectives and criteria stated in the QAPPs and the data validation guidelines in Section
5.2 and 5.3, above, project data were validated by the EPA Region 10 Manchester Laboratory.
Validation results are documented in the Reference section of this report.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 . Page: 28 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table 5. Inorganics Measurements of Dump Site Samples
Station
Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Zinc
CAS
Number
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
3
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
95080023
Sediment
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
95080024
Water
Metals Measurements
7429905
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440508
7439896
. 7439921
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440235
7440666
fng/kg
4710
5.76
411
0.75
6.6
10100
5.9
59.7
386000
142
1070
444
0.0211
106
450
226
E
P
P
P
U
wjfl
36.9
1
195
0.3
0.52
101000
1
2
8010
1.93
12700
141
0.1
13
8950
25800
237
BN
U
U
P
U
P
B
U
mg/kg
10600
1.84
56.4
0.37
0.55
1300
16
11.5
20000
18.1
1990
385
0.0299
11.9
330
134
P
P
pg/i
335
1
17.1
0.3
0.3
8030
1
1.6
569
1.12
3200
27.4
0.1
1.61
1400
16800
59.5
N
U
B
U
U
U
P
B
U
P
5
Estuary, Upper
Beach Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
rng/Kg
10600
6.8
15.4
0.42
0.23
2880
19.1
15.9
25700
13.5
4450
133
0.0155
11.7
1030
7300
P
P
General Chemistry Measurements:
Units
Alkalinity
Ammonia
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrate+Nitrite
Sulfate
••
< *
mg/{
263
0.052
41.9
0.067
1.22
51.4
J
mg/< - -
18.8
0.02
27.7
0.05
1.15
11.6
U
J
U
>
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Page: 29 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table 6. Organics Measurements of Dump Site Samples
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units
3-OH-Carbofuran
4-Hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzoic acid
4-Hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzoic acid
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Aeifluorfen
Anthracene
Benzene
Benzoic acid, 3-amino-2,5-dichloro-
1 ,4,5,6,7,7-hexachloro-
bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene -2,3-
dicarboxylic acid, (Chlorendic
acid)
Carbofuran
Chloroform
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dinoseb
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin Ketone
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Mercaptodimethur
P.P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
P,P'-DDT
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
Retene
Toxaphene
CAS
Number
16655826
106445
100027
83329
50594666
120127
71432
133904
115286
1563662
67663
84742
132649
84662
88857
1031078
53494705
206440
86737
2032657
72548
50293
72559
87865
129000
483658
8001352
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
MS/kg
4.668
19
127
51.3
212
152
523
47.1
3.2
126
4.668
2.2
5480
43.6
152
192
57
57
227
42.2
9.336
132
35
32
64
255
152
1142
U
NJ
U
J
U
U
R
J
U
R
U
J
U
J
U
R
U
J
U
J
J
J
U
U
U
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
pg/i
0.5
0.28
0.257
0.017
0.632
0.28
0.081
0.153
0.49
0.5
1
0.075
0.0087
0.28
0.232
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.28
1
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.022
0.28
0.28
0.82
U
U
R
J
R
U
J
R
J
U
U
J
J
U
R
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
J
3
FW Stream
Below
Dump Site
95080023
Sediment
. ug/f<0
10.337
9
61
66.6
102
66.6
252
66.6
2
61
2.067
2
1630
66.6
66.6
92
22
25
66.6
66.6
22.949
25
9
25
31
66.6
332
166
>
U
NJ
NJ
U
U
U
R
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
U
R
J
UJ
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump
Site
95080024
Water
. , V8ll
0.5
0.28
0.273
0.28
0.671
0.28
0.068
0.163
0.56
0.5
1
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.246
0.05
0.05
0.28
0.28
1
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.024
0.28
0.28
1.07
U
U
R
U
R
U
J
R
J
U
U
U
U
J
R
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
5
Estuary,
Upper Beach
Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
W*»
18.1
234
70
175
225
103
554
103
5.3
134
7.2
1
1820
103
103
203
39
39
57.3
103
21.9
10
16
39
68
103
51.1
772
J
J
U
U
R
U
U
R
J
U
U
U
R
U
UJ
J
U
J
J
UJ
U
U
J
U
>
•
•
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 30 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table 7. Tentatively identified organics in dumpsite samples. (Page 1 of 2)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units
CAS
Number
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
ug/Kg
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
ug/L
3
FW Stream,
Below Dump
Cita
95080023
Sediment
ug/Kg
5
Estuary, Upper
Beach Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
ug/Kg
S&mivotetile (BNA) Target Compounds
.gamma.-Sitosterol
1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic
1 1-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-
9-Hexadecenoic acid
9-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)-
Aromatic Unknown 01
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-
Carbamic acid, phenyl-, 1 -methylethyl es
Cholesterol
Docosanolc acid
Docosanoic acid, methyl
Dodecanoic acid
Eicosanoic acid
Hexadecanoic acid
Hydrocarbon Unknown 03
Hydrocarbon Unknown 02
Hydrocarbon Unknown 01
Lup-20(29)-en-3-one
Oxacycloheptadecan-2-one
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl, methyl e
Pentadecanoic acid
Pentadecanoic acid, methyl ester
Phytol
Stig mast-4-en-3-one
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-m
Tetradecanoic acid
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-m
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl ester, (S)-
Unknown 05
Unknown 06
Unknown 08
Unknown 04
Unknown 03
Unknown 02
Vitamin E
83476
1740198
55000425
60333
57103
1120258
123080
121335
122429
57885
112856
929771
143077
506309
57103
1617705
109295
5129602
1002842
7132641
150867
1058613
5746587
544638
5129668
62691058
59029
11900
2440
5190
664
406
504
800
301
670
22400
3630
8390
3100
3250
1840
4330
1750
2480
2140
504
645
7360
2030
1610
275
NJ
NJ
JN
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
JN
NJ
0,23
0.19
0.21
0.18
0.24
0.34
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
454
4130
2020
540
307
766
762
389
11500
3460
1050
1070
2030
307
1110
980
1140
915
1590
391
398
179
NJ
NJ
JN
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
NJ
5460
693
1860
8150
4700
1070
1390
752
19200
2460
2410
4680
7250
1890
5660
3560
563
1380
879
4260
304
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
NJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 31 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 7. Tentatively identified organics in dumpsite samples, continued (Page 2 of 2)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units
CAS
Number
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
ug/Kg
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
ug/L
3
FW Stream,
Below Dump
Site
95080023
Sediment
ug/Kg
5
Estuary, Upper
Beach Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
ug/Kg
Volatile Target Compounds
1 ,2-Propadiene
1,2,4-Trioxolane, 3,5-diphenyl-
2-Heptanone
2-Hexene, 5-methyl-, (E)
2,5-Cyclohexadien-1 -one, 4-ethyl-3,4-dim
2-Butene, (E)
2-Decene, 4-methyl-, (Z)-
4-Undecene, (E)
4-Nonene, 3-methyl-, (Z)
Cyclohexane, 1,1,2,3-tetramethyl
Cyclohexane, 2,4-diethyl-1 -methyl-
Cyclopentane, 1 ,2-dibutyl-
Decanal
Decane, 2,2,6-trimethyl-
Disulfide, dimethyl
Ethyne, dichloro-
Hexanal
Methane, thiobis-
Nonane, 3-methyl-5-propyl-
Octane
Pentane
463490
23888155
110430
7385822
17429355
624646
74630301
693629
63830693
6783922
61142709
62199524
112312
62237972
624920
7572294
66251
75183
31081182
111659
109660
3.9
6.6
5.4
9.9
21.2
6.1
8.2
9.8
3.6
4.4
11.8
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
4.7
6.2
3.2
7.9
4.6
7.1
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
7.4
4
5.7
6.4
4.5
20.4
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 32 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table 8. Microbiology Measurements of Dumpsite Samples
Station Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample
Number
Total eoUform
#/lOOml
Fecal coliforitr
#/1QOml
E eo//
#f1QQml
Snteracocci
#flOdml
HPC
Wm\
SPS
Anaerobic
#/ml
3PS
Aerobic
#/ml
Ratfo
Anaerobtc/Aerdbb
Gtostridium
perfriflgens
#fmi
15
Dump Site Leachate
Water
95080031
20
<18
<18
<18
2.5002
clear = 6.6
black = 0.5
total = 7.1
21
2.96
0,5
no enterotoxin
present
16A
FW Stream, Above
Dump Site
Water
95080032
130
4.5
2.0
4.0
10.0001
19.8
22.3
1.13
<1
16B
FW Stream, Below
Dump Site
Water
95080030
7.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8002
<1
5.6
< 5.6
<1
Transfer Blank
Water
<1.8
<1.8
<1.8
<1.8
<1.0
<1
<1
-
<1
'Yellow colonies present.
fellow and Purple colonies present.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Page: 33 of 89
-------
The Shoal-water Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 9. Inon
Station Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample Numbers
CAS
Number
anics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
6
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240100
95240101
7
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Water
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
8
Lower Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240106
95240107
9
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Water
95240111
95240110
95240109
95240108
Metals Measurements
Units
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
%Solid (Metals)
7429905
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7440020
7440097
7782492
7440224
7440235
7440622
7440666
mg/fcg
6050
10
14.4
0.229
1660
11.2
3.94
5.25
20300
3.7
3090
130
8.57
358
10
0.44
132
27.4
35.3
63.5%
u
p
p
p
mn
67
6.42
3.4
0.3
7270
1
10
3
4710
0.5
5510
104
0.3
3610
2
0.1
24600
3.3
7
P
N
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UNE
P
PB
mg/kg
6080
10
9.41
0.17
1340
11.4
2.92
2.7
15000
1.7
2990
101
10.7
379
6.4
0.3
259
22.7
24.9
71.2%
u
p
p
p
p
M9/I
71
7.82
2.5
0.3
12900
1
10
3
4840
0.5
22900
110
0.3
8340
2
0.1
167000
3
11
P
N
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UNE
U
PB
General Chemistry Measurements
Units
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 ^ 1995
Table 10. Organics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
Station Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample
Numbers
Units
2,4-D
Azinphos-methyl
Carbofuran
Chlorpropham
(CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Diazinon
Dichlobenil
Dichlorobenzamide
Napropamide
Norflurazon
o.p'-DDD
p,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDE
Trichlopyr
CAS
Number
94757
86500
1194656
101213
2921882
333415
1194656
15299997
273141132
53190
50293
72548
72559
55335063
6
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240100
95240101
MQ/ka
51
36
91
16
18
10
68
18
18
4.5
71
30
41
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
NJ
U
U
NJ .
NJ
NJ
NJ
UJ
7
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Water
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
M0A
0.12
0.21
0.43
0.1
0.044
0.23
1.9
0.14
0.2
1
0.048
0.12
0.0088
0.048
0.028
NJ
J
J
NJ
U
U
J
U
J
8
Lower Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240106
95240107
M0&9
42
28
70
12
14
1.5
52
35
10
10
3
10
34
UJ
U
U
U
U
NJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
NJ
U
UJ
9
Lower Cranberry Ditch
Water
95240111
95240110
95240109
95240108
M9/I
0.091
0.22
0.35
0.1
0.046
0.27
2
0.14
0.2
0.78
0.048
0.11
0.01
0.048
0.023
NJ
J
J
NJ
U
U
J
U
J
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 35 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table 11. Metals Measurements of Tideflat Samples
Station Number
Location
EPA SampleNumber
Media
Uftits
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
CAS
Number
-
55000425
7440360
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440702
7440473
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440235
10
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344301
Sediment
mgftg
10300
4
4.98
15.8
0.37
2510
18.3
10.4
19600
3.58
5270
136
0.05
13
1930
6730
U
P
U
11
Willapa Bay, Oyster
Bed
94344302
Sediment
nig/kg
5710
4
3.97
5.57
0.19
1410
12.6
3.9
13700
2.22
3420
128
0.05
8.56
866
3270
U
P
U
12
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1994
94344303
Sediment
mg/k§
10700
4
8.94
17
0.38
2650
19.9
12.5
27800
4.5
5270
134
0.05
13.2
1970
5080
U
P
U
12A
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1995
95080022
Sediment
*ng/kg
9720
5.5
9.46
17.6 '
0.542
2390
18.9
15.3
18500
8.33
4950
114
0.0222
14.4
1830
2480
PEN
13
Hawks Point
Shellfish Area
9434304
Sediment
rag/kg
6590
4
2.71
6.01
0.24
1470
12.7
4.77
13000
1.71
3420
111
0.05
9
796
2940
U
P
U
1
4
Willapa Bay
Ellen Sands
9434300
Sediment
tngftg
5620
4
2.99
6.08
0.19
1600
11.1
3.84
12900
1.8
3170
141
0.05
8.87
730
2910
U
P
U
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
95080020
Sediment
mgficg
15100
4
14.4
23.3
0.808
3850
30.4
28.4
36100
13.7
7380
145
0.0445
19.6
2680
13300
UN
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 36 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 12. Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Unite
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 H-lndole, dibromb
2-Hexanone
4-Hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzoic acid
4-Hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzonitrile
4-Hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzoic acid
4-Hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzonitrile
4-Methylphenol
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acifluorfen
Benzoic acid, 3-amino-2,5-dichloro-
Butyltin trichloride
Carbon disulfide
Chloroform
Dibutyltin dichloride
Dichlorobenzoic Acid
Dinoseb
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pyrene
Retene
Tributyltin. chloride
CAS
Number
591786
1689845
1689834
106445
108101
50594666
133904
1118463
75150
67663
683181
88857
100414
206440
118741
129000
483658
1461229
10
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344301
Sediment
yg/kg
35
3.4
134
217
131
0.95
273
66
6.4
4
3.5
8.7
65
100
3.5
131
17.2
131
8.8
J
J
J
J
U
J
U
U
J
U
U
U
R
R
U
U
J
U
11
Willapa Bay, Oyster
Bed
94344302
Sediment
MS/kg
1.8
66
99
108
1.8
249
60
3.5
9
1.8
7
60
91
1.8
108
108
108
3.8
U
J
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
R
U
U
U
U
U
12
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1994
94344303
Sediment
iig&g
4
205
261
152
4
310
75
5.3
19.8
4
21.6
74
114
4
152
10.3
152
152
1.4
U
J
J
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
R
R
J
UJ
J
UJ
UJ
J
12A
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1995
95080022
Sediment
t
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 13. Tentatively Identified Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples (Page 1 of 2)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units .
.gamma.-Sitosterol
11-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester
16-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester
2-Hexanone, 4-methyl
9-Hexadecenoic acid
Aldol Condensate Unknown
Cholesterol
Docosanoic acid
Eicosanoic acid
Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl)
ester
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester
Hexadecanoic acid
Hexanal
Hydrocarbon Unknown 02
Hydrocarbon Unknown 03
Hydrocarbon Unknown 04
Hydrocarbon Unknown 01
CAS
Number
83476
55000425
56554495
105420
2091294
57885
112856
506309
103231
112390
57103
66251
10
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344301
Sediment
trig/kg
1720
1370
788
400
663
NJ
NJ
J
NJ
NJ
11
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344302
Sediment
mg/kg
66.1
NJ
12
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1994
94344303
Sediment
ftig/kg
3.2
714
396
NJ
NJ
NJ
12A
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1995
95080022
Sediment
mg/kg
5240
1.3
2600
733
3730
754
362
816
7320
1.4
1430
2740
1240
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
13
Hawks Point
Shellfish Area
9434304
Sediment
mQ/kg
804
237
NJ
NJ
14
Willapa Bay
Ellen Sands
94343
Sedim
ntg/kg;
i
00
ent
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
95080020
Sediment
mg/fcg
1790
1050
7260
2760
820
327
19900
1.2
1270
1800
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 38 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 13. Tentatively Identified Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples, continued (Page 2 of 2)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
Units
Oxacycloheptadecan-2-one
Oxacyclotetradecan-2-one
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl,
methyl ester
Pentadecanoic acid
Phytol
Propanal, 2-methyl-
S6
S7
Stigmast-4-en-3-one
Sulfur, mol. (S8)
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-m
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-m
Tetradecanoic acid
Thiobismethane
Unknown 02
Unknown 03
Unknown 04
Unknown 05
Unknown 06
Unknown 01
Vitamin E
CAS
Number
109295
1725048
78842
1058613
10544500
5129668
5746587
544638
75183
59029
10
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344301
Sediment
fine/kg
876
677
821
14
NJ
NJ
J
J
NJ
11
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344302
Sediment
rag/kg
71.5
301
76.5
73.9
NJ
NJ
J
J
12
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1994
94344303
Sediment
nrg&g
513
882
57.2
435
686
405
245
278
329
J
NJ
NJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
12A
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1995
95080022
Sediment
ftng/kg
583
1100
1100
1.3
1780
738
351
1520
562
3.3
1710
1070
1150
1250
2610
444
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
JN
NJ
13
Hawks Point
Shellfish Area
9434304
Sediment
mg&g
352
2700
252
350
616
1700
NJ
NJ
J
J
J
J
14
Willapa Bay
Ellen Sands
9434:
500
Sediment
mg/kg \\
139
1320
57.5
123
109
NJ
NJ
J
J
J
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
95080020
Sediment
tng/kg
1400
2480
2590
5250
2220
2820
738
4770
1470
4.1
494
1610
1840
4830
673
-
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
JN
JN
JN
JN
NJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 39 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 14. Lead Measurements in Drinking Water Samples
Station
Number
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
24
25
26
28
31
33
34
38
39
40
41
42
44
46
47
EPA Sample
Number
95430559
95430557
95430539
95430561
95430534
95430537
95430550
95430545
95430530
95430531
95430532
95430536
95430556
95430549
95430560
95430538
95430540
95430546
95430548
95430547
95430558
95430552
95430533
95430535
95430551
95430542
95430543
95430554
95430555
95430544
95430553
95430541
Sample
Descriptor
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-center
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Westport
Grayland
Reservation-annex
Reservation-annex
Ocosta
Ocosta
Ocosta
South Bend
Reservation-east
Westport
Lead
"First Pour"
(pg'i)
0.5
0.69
0.77
0.74
0.5
0.91
0.76
0.5
3.64
0.58
0.68
0.73
0.5
0.81
0.56
1.27
0.65
0.5
6.28
2.54
4.23
0.58
3.22
0.5
1.56
0.5
0.5
1.59
0.5
3.32
3.37
0.5
U
P
P
U
P
P
U
P
P
P
U
P
P
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
Lead
"Flushed
Tap"
(PS/I)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.88
0.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Temp-
erature
co
22.8
21.9
12
23.3
13
15
20
11
13
. 14
14
13
22.3
9
23.3
13
13
13
14
12
21.5
18
13
12
16
15
12
17
17
11
16
19
pH
7.46
7.95
7.61
7.55
7.57
7.32
7.13
7.34
7.7
7.83
7.66
7.3
7.57
7.37
7.55
7.64
7.29
7.26
7.38
7.38
7.79
7.35
8.09
7.48
7.46
7.28
7.48
7.62
7.27
6.89
7.18
7.72
Conductivity
(«$>
171
173
171
172
170
170
173
171
184
164
170
171
173
171
172
172
170
170
169
170
166
171
362
183
211
211
130
175
238
93
194
364
•
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 40 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
Table 15. Metals Measurements of Drinking Water Samples (Page 1 of 2)
STATION
LOCATION
EPA NUMBER
SOURCE
UNITS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silica
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
CAS NUMBER
7429905
7440360
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440428
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7439976
7439987
7440020
7440097
7782492
7631869
7440224
7440235
7440280
7440622
7440666
METHOD NUMBER
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
CVAA
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
200.7
200.8
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
8
Reservation
. east
95430508
kitchen tap
- pgfl I
24
0.5
1.7
2
0.5
24
2
12400
5
10
15.2
14
0.5
5400
1
0.2
5
10
1600
2
32600
3
14400
1
16.5
48.3
P
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
9
Reservation
east
95430501
kitchen tap
V& I
20
0.5
1.7
2
0.5
17
2
12500
5
10
6.7
10
0.5
5380
1
0.2
5
10
1500
2
33200
3
14500
1
15.7
31.7
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
19
Reservation
east
95430503
kitchen tap
p& i
20
0.5
1.5
2
0.5
16
2
12300
5
10
65.4
21.5
0.5
5390
1
0.2
5
10
1200
2
32800
3
14700
1
14.4
36.7
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
31
Reservation
west
95430502
kitchen tap
V& |
20
0.5
1.6
2
0.5
21
2
12400
5
10
8.88
17
0.5
5340
1
0.2
5
10
1600
2
32800
3
13900
1
15.3
61.3
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
34
Grayland
95430520
laundry tap
ygs |
20
0.5
2.6
2
0.5
27
2
15300
5
10
3.4
10
0.5
7000
1
0.2
5
10
1300
2
23300
3
11700
1
10.1
5.5
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430516
outdoor tap
ugfl
20
0.5
5.3
2
0.5
16
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5590
1.1
0.2
5
10
1900
2
25200
3
9800
1
8.3
7.7
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430517
outdoor tap
M9ft
20
0.5
5.28
2
0.5
17
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5560
1
0.2
5
10
2000
2
25100
3
9740
1
8
9.6
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
P
36
Reservation
Dexter
95430500
kitchen tap
pg/1
20
0.5
5.05
2
0.5
19
2
16700
5
10
1.4
11
.0.5
5290
1
0.2
5
10
1800
2
25400
3
9760
1
9.1
26.2
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
^
Reservation
east
95430507
kitchen tap
re" I
20
0.5
1.8
2
0.5
19
2
12500
5
10
38.2
12
0.5
5400
1
0.2
5
10
1500
2
32800
3
14300
1
16.2
40.9
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
38
Reservation
Annex
95430504
kitchen tap
tig/I
20
0.5
4.2
2
0.5
23
2
23900
5
10
2.2
170
0.5
4730
114
0.2
5
10
3120
2
36000
3
11500
1
3
6.7
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
39
Reservation
Annex
95430505
kitchen tap
»& I
20
0.5
4.2
2
0.5
21
2
23900
5
10
1
186
0.5
4740
138
0.2
5
10
3130
2
36100
3
11600
1
3
4.2
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 41 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 15. Inorganic Measurements in Drinking Water Samples (Continued, Page 2 of 2)
STATION
LOCATION
EPA NUMBER
SOURCE
UNITS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silica
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
CAS NUMBER
7429905
7440360
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440428
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7439976
7439987
7440020
7440097
7782492
7631869.
7440224
7440235
7440280
7440622
7440666
METHOD NUMBER
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
CVAA
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
200.7
200.8
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
40
Ocosta
95430509
kitchen tap
US/) i
20
0.5
1
2
0.5
19
2
12500
5
10
1.6
17
0.5
4430
1
0.2
5
10
1000
2
22400
3
7870
1
3
83.2
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
41
Ocosta
95430510
kitchen tap
V&
20
0.5
2.8
3.4
0.5
21
2
16000
5
10
1
1140
0.5
7910
OCC
ZOO
0.2
5
10
3340
2
41600
3
7880
1
3
21
U
U
P
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
42
Ocosta
95430511
Bathroom tap
VS&
20
0.5
4.2
3.5
0.5
23
2
18600
5
10
1
1090
0.5
12500
414
0.2
5
10
4650
2
62800
3
11300
1
9.4
9.8
U
U
P
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
P
44
South
Bend
95430514
kitchen tap
M3»
30
0.5
1
2
0.5
17
2
7720
5
10
46
25.8
0.55
2410
1
0.2
5
10
820
2
19500
3
7360
1
3
4
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
45
Bay
Center
95430515
bathroom
HS#
20
0.5
1.1
11.6
0.5
46
2
38100
5
10
1
1160
0.5
14700
165
0.2
5
10
8440
2
49100
3
9810
1
3
4.1
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
46
Reservation
east
95430518
kitchen tap
MS*
20
0.5
1.7
2
0.5
18
2
12400
5
10
40.5
16
0.88
5360
1
0.2
5
10
1500
2
32400
3
14500
1
15
140
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
47
Westport
95430512
kitchen tap
MBfl
20
0.5
10.5
2
0.5
130
2
7150
5
10
3.6
40.8
0.5
14100
4.7
0.2
5
10
13600
2
22400
3
40100
1
3
4
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
48
Reservation
center
95430506
well tap
JO* •
20
0.5
1
2
0.5
24
2
9520
5
10
1
4930
0.5
4320
19.3
0.2
5
10
1600
2
12100
3
12600
1
4.9
1050
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
49
Tokel.
nd
95430513
kitchen tap
rafi
20
0.5
5.9
2
0.5
16
2
15600
5
10
6.21
39.7
0.5
5860
18.4
0.2
5
10
1800
2
26100
3
9740
1
7.1
4
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
50
Reservation
Tokeland
95430519
well tap
PSt
20
0.5
1.2
2.9
0.5
47
2
13000
5
10
1
334
0.5
7630
94
0.2
5
10
1700
2
30400
3
58000
1
3
4
U
U
P
P
U
P
U
U.
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
BLANK
95430521
blank
V$
20
0.5
1
2
0.5
19
2
5
5
10
1 .
10
0.5
20
1
0.2
5
10
650
2
64
3
39
1
3
4
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Page: 42 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
Table 16. General Chemistry Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
STATION
LOCATION
EPA NUMBER
SOURCE
UMTS
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
Ammonia, N
Nitrate+Nitrite,N
Tot Phosphorus
Sulfate
Temperature
pH, field
Conductivity
- STATION
LOCATION
EPA NUMBER
SOURCE
ftWTS
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
Ammonia, N
Nitrate+Nltrite,N
Tot Phosphorus
Sulfate
Temperature
pH, field
Conductivity
METHOD NUMBER
Titrimetry
Ion Chrom.
Ion Chrom.
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Ion Chrom.
Electrometry
Electrometry
Electrometry
310.1
300.0
300.0
350.1
353.2
365.1
300.0
METHOD NUMBER
\
Titrimetry
Ion Chrom.
Ion Chrom.
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Ion Chrom.
Electrometry
Electrometry
Electrometry
310.1
300.0
300.0
350.1
353.2
365.1
300.0
&
Reservation
east
95430508
kitchen tap
fflgst
54.5
16.5
0.963
0.21
0.076
0.202
3.03
16.6
7.74
174
HJN
40
Ocosta
95430509
kitchen tap^
m$/l
36.2
6.63
0.169
0.16
0.168
0.081
2.59
12.6
7.59
130
HJN
9
Reservation
east
95430501
kitchen tap
mgf\
54.2
16.5
0.984
0.18
0.079
0.257
3.1
13.5
7.92
174
HJN
41
Ocosta
95430510
kitchen tap
fflg/l
101
7.77
0.251
0.36
0.007
0.512
2.99
13.6
7.55
182
HJN
U
19
Reservat on
east
95430503
kitchen tap
ffig/l .
71.9
16.4
0.952
0.29
0.074
024
3.02
14.4
7.78
174
HJN
42
Ocosta
95430511
bathroom tap
iflgfl
106
9.55
0.314
0.12
0.007
1.15
1.72
12.7
7.04
241
HJN
U
31
Reservation
west
95430502
kitchen tap
flag/I
53.4
16.1
0.847
0.23
0.074
0.203
3.02
14.2
7.76
170
HJN
44
South
Bend
95430514
kitchen tap
wgfl~
29.5
7.79
1.01
0.1
0.59
0.045
3.12
7.3
7.68
99
HJN
34
Grayland
95430520
laundry tap
fligfl :
36
16.8
0:155
0.12
0.17
0.121
5.43
12.1
8.62
184
HJN
45
Bay
Center
95430515
bathroom
jngfl
164
10.8
0.239
0.95
0.007
1.26
1.23
13.7
7.83
345
HJN
U
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430516
outdoor tap
rag/l
73.1
11.6
0.192
0.2
0.036
0.244
5.06
13.2
8.69
169
HJN
46
Reservation
east
95430518
kitchen tap
mg/t
54.1
16.5
0.976
0.22
0.081
0.257
3.04
12.6
8.08
170
HJN
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430517
outdoor tap
mg/l
60
11.6
0.193
0.16
0.04
0.208
5.07
13.2
8.69
169
HJN
47
Westport
95430512
kitchen tap
mgn
110
36
0.311
0.22
0.009
0.512
10.4
13.5
8.03
364
HJN
36
Reservation
Dexter
95430500
kitchen tap
mg/f
60.6
.11.6
0.192
0.23
0.037
0.19
5.13
13.5
8.44
195
HJN
48
Reservation
center
95430506
well tap
rogfl
65.7
17
0.164
0.22
0.007
0.054
1.26
11.9
8.76
144
HJN
U
37
Reservation
east
95430507
kitchen tap
mga
54.4
16.4
0.846
0.16
0.085
0.211
3
15.1
7.75
171
HJN
49
Tokeland
95430513
kitchen tap
mga
200
10.8
0.196
0.24
0.033
0.2
5.94
13
7.95
205
HJN
38
t
Reservation
Annex
95430504
kitchen tap
mg/l
76.52
13jl
0.235
0.19
0.007
0.52
7.85
13.2
7.8^1
21
I
HJN
U
50
Ressrvation
Tokeland
95430519
well tap
mg/J
164
14.^
0.398
0.4J9
0.007
0.82
3.37
12.9
7.83
359
HJN
U
39
Reservation
Annex
95430505
kitchen tap
mgfl
93.6
13.1
0.24
0.21
0.008
0.53
8.27
13.7
7.81
212
HJN
BLANK
95430521
blank
mo,/l
1.31
0.05
0.01
0.14
0.007
0.052
0.05
7.12
2
U
U
HJN
U
U
lab
lab
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 43 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 17. Manganese and Iron in Drinking Water Samples
Station
Number
38
39
41
42
45
46
47
EPA Sample
Number
95430504
95430505
95430510
9543051 1
95430515
95430518
95430512
Sample
Descriptor
Reservation-annex
Reservation-annex
Ocosta
Ocosta
South Bend
Reservation-east
Westport
Source
kitchen tap
kitchen tap
kitchen tap
bathroom tap
bathroom tap
kitchen tap
kitchen tap
Manganese
ug/l
114
138
266
414
165
19.3
94
Iron
ug/l
170
186
1140
1090
1160
4930
334
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 44 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 18. Microbiology Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Station
Number *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
24
25
26
28
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
44
47
Transfer blank,
Day1
Transfer blank,
Day 2
Sample
Descriptor
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservation-east
Reservatio n-center
Reservation-center
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Reservation-west
Westport
Westport
Grayland
Reservation-Dexter
Reservation-Dexter
Reservation-east
Reservation-annex
Reservation-annex
Ocosta
Ocosta
Ocosta
South Bend
Westport
EPA Sample
' - Number —
95430603
95430604
95430605
95430606
95430607
• 95430608
95430609
95430610
95430611
95430612
95430613
95430614
95430617
95430618
95430619
95430620
95430621
95430622
95430623
95430625
95430626
95430624
95430627
95430631
95430633
95430634
95430601
95430600
95430602
95430616
95430615
95430630
95430628
95430629
95430635
95430632
95430636
95430637
Total
chlorine
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.25
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.35
0.3
0.3
trace
<0.1
trace
trace
• 0.15
0.1
<0,1
<0.1
<0.1
0.15
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
trace .
Free
• Chlorine
0.2
0.2 '
0.15
0.25
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.25
0.3
0:2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.35
0.3
0.3
trace
<0.1
<0.1
trace
0.1
trace
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
trace
Total
Conform
perlQQ-
ml
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
<1
<1
1
1
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Repeat
sampling and
results,
proportion
and (#/1 00ml)
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes, 1/4, (2)
no
no
yes, 4/4, (1)
yes. 0/4, (<1)
yes, 1/4,(1)
no
no
no
no
no
yes, 1/4, (1)
no
no
yes, (< 1)
no
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 45 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
5.4.1 Data Quality Elements Used For Evaluation of Organics Data
Organics data for each sample were evaluated and determined to be acceptable for the following
data quality elements except as is noted, below:
• Holding Times and Sample Preservation
• GC/MS Tuning and Performance
• Initial Calibration
Note that a five-point initial calibration was used for all samples except for
phenoxy-acid herbicide measurements and the munition compounds measurements,
which were from a three-point calibration
• Continuing Calibration
• Blanks (see Appendix D for a listing of method blank results)
• Surrogate Spike Recoveries
• MS/MSD Samples (see Appendix E for a listing of MS/MSD results)
The following target compounds had unacceptable recoveries in MS samples,
therefore, results were qualified with an "R" flag: dinoseb in samples 94334300 to
94334304; dinoseb, acifluorfen, chloramben, and 4-nitrophenol in samples
95080020 to 95080026; aniline, hexachloroethane, 4-chloroaniline, and
hexachlorocyclopentadiene in sample 95080023; dinoseb, acifluorfen, and
chloramben in samples 95080020 to 95080023 and in sample 95080025; dinoseb,
acifluorfen, 4-nitrophenol, and chloramben in samples 95080024 and 95080026;
and 5-hydroxydicamba, picloram, and dalapon in samples 95240104 and
95240110.
The average recoveries of demeton-o, demeton-s, and disulfoton were 244%,
771%, and 249%, respectfully, in the ms/msd of sample 95080024. These target
compounds were qualified with a "UJ" or "J" in samples 95080034 and 95080025.
• Internal Standard Performance
• Target Compound Identification
Two compounds were not measured by the method 8330, used to measure
explosives - RDX and PGDN. RDX and PGDN results are qualified with a "R".
• Tentative Identified Compounds
• Compound Quantitation
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 46 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
• Overall Assessment of Data
5.4.2 Elements Used For Evaluation of Inorganics Data
Inorganics data for each sample was evaluated and determined to be acceptable for the following
data quality elements except as is noted, below:
• Holding Time
Holding time for ammonia in some samples were exceeded by one day, and results
were qualified with a "H".
• Sample Preparation
• Calibration
• Reference Control Samples
• Blanks
• ICP-AES Interference Check Sample
Ammonia Results Were Qualified with a "J" Due to Unacceptable Results of a QC
Check Standard.
• ICP-AES Serial Dilution
• MS Analysis
Recovery of ammonia in sample 95430500 was low and results were qualified with
a "N".
• Detection Limits
• Data Summary
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 47of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
5.4.3 Evaluation of Data Validation Reports
Validation results are documented in the Reference Section of this Report (23-47).
The EPA Region 10 QA Unit reviewed each data validation report foTcompleteness and
adherence to written EPA data validation guidelines. All project results were determined to have
been correctly qualified in the data validation reports and in the sample measurement results.
In cases where more that one qualifier was placed upon the data, the most restrictive qualifier was
used to qualify the measurement value.
In general, all project data which do not have an attached qualifier can be used to meet the
objectives of the project and the corresponding QAPP. The usefulness of qualified data depends
upon the severity of the qualifier, the nature of the sample, and the use of the data. The final
usability of the data is determined by the use of the data and the data user.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 48 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Chapter 6.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This limited study, designed to characterize four of the various pollution pathways which could
reasonably be considered important to persons living in the area, focused on a relatively few
sampling stations. Direct contaminant exposure via air pathways, and possible long term
contamination of ground water resources were beyond the scope of the study. Also, with the
possible exception of drinking water household sampling, the relatively small number of samples
limits the degree of certainty in assessing the likelihood of environmental risk which might be
associated with these pollution pathways. However, such an approach does provide an initial
focus for screening out major chemical or microbiological problems and highlight issues which
may exist in the four contamination routes investigated.
The four basic pollution pathways considered in this assessment were: (See Figure 1)
(1) Dump site, and its drainage to tidelands
(chemical and microbiological screening of sediment and water)
(2) Agricultural runoff from cranberry bogs toward tidelands
(chemical screening for contaminants in sediment and water, focusing especially
on pesticides)
(3) Tideflat sediments and shellfish associated with nearby Tribal subsistence
harvesting and mariculture
(a) sediment screening for chemical contaminants
(b) water and shellfish tissue screening for microbiological contaminants from
leaking septic systems.
(4) Drinking water supplies, at 32 separate households;
(a) tap water screening for lead (32 samples) and other inorganic parameters (11
samples)
(b) source water screening for microbiological contaminants from leaking septic
systems.
6.1 Dump Site Drainage toward Tidelands (see Tables 5 to 8; Figure 2)
6.1.1 Metals in Dump Site Sediment (Stations #1, 3, 5)
Table 5 shows metal residues and basic water chemistry parameters for the dump site samples.
The upper dump site sediment (Station #1) was taken in an area rich in apparent leachate, but
surrounded by many discarded, rusting car bodies and other metal waste. Not surprisingly, this
sample was very high in iron (nearly 39 %; Table 5). The sediment sample from the lower
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 49 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
part of this waste stream (Station #3) showed only about 2 % iron, with about 2.6 % iron in the
sediment from the beach lagoon (Station #5).
Lead was found in the upper sediment at 142 mg/kg (parts per million; ppm), decreasing to 18.1
mg/kgurthelower sediment, and 1373 mg/kgln the sediment from thlTlower beach lagoon as thlT
pathway progresses toward the sea. For these samples, lead levels were well below the State of
Washington's marine sediment quality standard of 450 ppm (dry weight) (48), and EPA Region
10's risk- based criterion of 400 mg/kg, for urban soils (49). Total mercury levels were
unremarkable in all three sediment samples, with respective findings of 0.02 and 0.03 mg/kg in
Stations #1 and 3, increasing to 0.16 mg/kg in the beach lagoon sediment. "Normal" background
for total mercury in sediment ranges from 0.01 to 0.5 mg/kg (50).
As with lead and especially iron, sediment concentrations of nickel, cadmium, and barium were
significantly highest in the upper dump site sample (Table 5). None of the levels exceeded EPA
health based risk standards for residential soils.
At the terminus of this pathway, the upper beach lagoon sediment sample (Station #5; see Table
5; Figure 2) only arsenic, chromium and magnesium appeared at levels greater than either of the
two sediment samples taken from the dump site path above it. Even so, the levels of these three
metals were well below EPA's health based risk numbers for residential soils (51). Again, most of
the remaining metals, including lead and mercury, showed declining trends in the sediment taken
from the lower part of this pathway (Station #5) as it approaches the sea.
Beryllium was present above the MDL, but not quantifiable, in all three sediment samples (Table
5). Normal background levels for beryllium in sediment are not available in the literature.
However, EPA's risk based numbers for beryllium in urban soil and residential soil respectively,
are 0.67 and 0.15 mg/kg (51). The MDL for the three samples ranged from 0.75 (Station #1) to
0.37 (Station #3) and 0.42.
6.1.2 Metals in Dump Site Water (Table 5)
Compared with the aqueous sample taken at the upper part of the dump site (Station #2; Figure 2,
Table 5), the aqueous sample (Station #4) taken along the lower reach of the same stream shows
a significant decline in all metals except aluminum (which increased about ninefold), and lead (a
slight decline from 1.93 to 1.12 ug/1). The increase in dissolved aluminum could be a result of the
dumping of spent aluminum containers in the vicinity. Sample #4, was extracted and analyzed
twice as a QA /QC duplicate, generating two sets of data for most of the analytes evaluated at this
station (see Appendix E).
Both calcium and alkalinity also decline greatly in the lower aqueous sample, by a factor of
approximately 13. This roughly parallels an approximately thirteenfold decrease in iron. Sulfate
levels also decreased nearly fivefold in the lower water sample.
Primary drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or maximum contaminant level
goals (MCLGs) were not exceeded in the two water samples from the dump. Other than iron and
lead in Sample #2, and zinc in both samples 2 and 4, ambient water quality criteria for aquatic life
were npt exceeded. In Sample #2, iron exceeded the freshwater acute criterion for aquatic life by
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 50 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
about eightfold. Lead in Sample #2 was 1.93 ug/1, slightly above the chronic freshwater criterion
for lead of 1.32 ug/1 (52). Zinc was noted in Sample #2 at 237 ug/1, and in Sample #4 at 59.5
ug/1. Freshwater aquatic life criteria for zinc are 65.4 ug/1 (acute) and 58.9 ug/1 (chronic) (52).
For beryllium in the aqueous samples, the MDLs were at 0.3 ug/1, well belowlheTiPA Drinking
Water MCL of 4 ug/1 for this metal (53). Beryllium MDLs were not sufficiently low to address
the (very conservative and much lower) EPA risk based modeled concentration of 0.016 ug/1,
which is modeled on carcinogenicity (51).
Manganese was measured in both water samples, at 141 and 27.4 ug/1, respectively. The
secondary MCL for manganese, based on taste and odor and not health effects, is 50 ug/1 (53).
Freshwater ambient water quality criteria have not been established for manganese.
6.1.3 Organics in Dump Site Sediment (Table 6)
Residues of organics measured in the dump site sample pathway are shown in Table 6 and are
discussed below.
6.1.3.1 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
In the upper dump sediment sample (Station #1), trace levels of the PAHs, pyrene (255 ug/kg),
fluoranthene (227 ug/kg), anthracene (47.1 ug/kg, estimated) and fluorene (42.2 ug/1, estimated)
were noted. All four of these PAHs are ubiquitous products of combustion of organic matter.
No such combustion-related PAH residues were measured in the lower sediment (Station #3).
However, the upper SQL for anthracene in this sample was a relatively high 66.6 ug/kg, which
would have not been sufficient to detect anthracene in Sediment Sample Station #1. At the
terminus of the sampling for the dump pathway, fluoranthene (noted in Sample #1) re-occurred at
a lower estimated concentration, 57.3 ug/kg. No other PAHs were noted in the sediment at the
lower beach lagoon.
Dibenzofuran, also associated with combustion of organic material, was estimated at 43.6 ug/kg
in the upper sediment sample, but was not detectible in the two sediment samples from lower in
the pathway.
Retene (also called phenanthrene, l-methyl-7-isopropyl) was found in Sediment Sample #3 (lower
dump), at 332 ug/kg. Retene is a "resin acid" associated with wood pulp and paper processing,
and is normally found in pulp mill effluent. Retene was not measured in the upper sediment
sample from the dump (SQL =152 ug/kg). However, retene was measured once again at the
terminus of the dump site pathway sampling, in Sample #5 (upper beach lagoon), at estimated
levels of 51.1 ug/kg.
In the upper sediment, 4-methylphenol (p-cresol) was estimated at 51.3 ug/kg. Although not
measured in the lower dump sample, the residue of 4-methylphenol increased to 175 ug/kg at the
lower lagoon sediment. This compound is associated with auto and diesel exhaust, coal tar, and is
also a natural product which occurs in plants (e.g., anise seed oil).
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 51 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Sediment samples 1 and 5 also revealed trace estimated levels of chloroform at 2.2 and 1 ug/kg,
respectively. Since chloroform is both an industrial solvent and a natural product sometimes
associated with plant matter, it is difficult to speculate about the source of this material.
6.1.3.2 Pesticide
Trace residues of the organochlorine pesticide metabolite, endrin ketone (57 ug/kg) were
measured in sediment Sample #1. Endrin is a highly toxic and bioaccumulative organochlorine
insecticide, whose agricultural uses have been greatly limited in the past decade because of
toxicity to non-target organisms. However, such a finding of 57 ug/kg in dump site sediment is
far below EPA's risk based endrin guideline of 23,000 ng/kg for residential soil (51). It would
thus appear of only minor significance in this drainage, especially since no levels of endrin or its
breakdown products were measured in the other two sediment samples taken further down the
dump site pathway's seaward progression.
Estimated residues of the DDT series (mostly p,p'-DDD, at 132 ug/kg, with 35 ug/kg p,p'-DDE
and 32 ug/kg p,p'-DDT) were also noted in sediment Sample #1 from the upper dump site
pathway.
ODD was not measured in Sample #3, but was estimated at 10 ug/kg in the beach lagoon
sediment. DDE was estimated at 9 ug/kg in Sample #3, and at 16 ng/kg in the beach lagoon
sediment sample. p,p'-DDT was measured only in Sample #1, and did not appear lower down in
the pathway.
For an agricultural area, and especially a dump site, these concentrations for the DDT series are
certainly within reasonable background. The health based EPA risk concentrations for residential
soil for ODD, DDE, and DDT are 2700, 1900, and 1900 ng/kg, respectively (51).
In sediment sample 3, a trace of endosulfan sulfate, a metabolite of the organochlorine pesticide,
endosulfan (thiodan), was measured at an estimated 22 ug/kg. No endosulfan-derived residues
were noted in the other two sediment samples from the dump drainage. EPA's health-based risk
concentration for endosulfan in residential soils is 470,000 ng/kg (51).
Traces of the carbamate insecticide carbofuran (furadan; 7.2 ng/kg) and its metabolite 3-hydroxy
carbofuran (18.1 ng/kg), were noted in the upper beach lagoon sediment. Another carbamate
pesticide, mercaptodimethur (methiocarb; mesurol; often used to control snails, slugs, various
insects, and also as a bird repellant) was measured in the lagoon sample 5 at 21.9 ug/kg. No
carbamate pesticide residues were found in the two sediment samples taken from the upper and
mid portions of the dump site drainage.
Phthalates (from plastic waste) were not measured in any of the three sediment samples, but the
SQLs (especially for di-N-butyl phthalate) for sediment were quite high. The analysis would have
been unable to detect any trace levels which might have otherwise been notable. However, two
common phthalate compounds were found in both water samples taken from the dump stream
(see below).
Ordnance compounds were not measured in any sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 52 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
6.1.3.3 Two Novel Bromo and lodo Compounds; Natural Products?
(See also Section 6.3.1.2.2)
Laboratory analysis (Table 6) revealed compelling evidence of the presence of two apparently
ubiquitous halogenated compoundslrffhe sediments taken from thlTdump sitfTdrainage. TheWo
compounds are 4-hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzoic acid (DBBA), and 4-hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzoic
acid (DIBA). There was evidence that DBBA was present at an estimated concentration of 19
Hg/kg, in the upper sediment sample from the dump pathway, and at 9 ng/kg in the lower
sediment sample. It then was estimated with certainty (J) at 234 ng/kg in the sediment sample
from the terminus of the pathway; the upper beach lagoon. DIB A was not noted in the upper
dump sediment (Sample #1, SQL of 127 ng/kg). However, it was estimated as likely (NJ;
occurring at 61 ng/kg) in Sediment Sample #2, and found with certainty at an estimated 70
in the upper beach lagoon sediment below the dump.
The significance of these two halogenated compounds is not clear. The mass spectral properties
for DBBA and DIBA, mimic those of the two synthetic herbicides, bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-
hydroxybenzonitrile, DBBN) and ioxynil (3,5-diiodo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile, DIBN),
respectively.
As discussed later in the section 6.3.1.2.2, DBBA, DBBN, DIBA, and DIBN were also found in
all seven tideflat sediment samples. Marine natural products containing bromine and iodine are
commonplace (54),(55). However the presence of DBBA and DIBA at low levels in freshwater
ecosystems like the sediment taken from the Dump Pathway poses several additional questions.
Rationale for assuming DBBA and DIBA to be most likely natural products will be discussed in
greater detail in the subsequent section on residues found in the sediments sampled from the
Tideflats Pathway.
6.1.4 Organics in Dump Site Water
The aqueous samples from both the upper (Station #2) and lower (Station #4) portions of the
dump site drainage revealed estimated traces of benzene at respective levels of 0.081 ng/1 (81
parts per trillion; ppt), and 0.068 ng/1 (68 ppt). Both levels are well below the drinking water
MCL for benzene of 5 jag/1 (53). They are also well below the freshwater quality ambient
criterion for human health (1.2 ng/1), based on ingestion of both water and aquatic organisms
(56). Because the area around Station #1 was rife with discarded rusty automobile bodies which
conceivably could still be leaking traces of fuel, this finding is not surprising.
Traces of the PAHs, acenaphthene and fluoranthene (found in crude oil, and also combustion
products), were estimated respectively at 0.017 and 0.01 jag/1 in the upper aqueous sample, but no
PAHs were noted in the lower sample.
Two phthalates frequently associated with plastic products such as bread wrappers and plastic
bags were found in the water samples. Sample #2 from the upper site had di-n-butylphthalate at
estimated levels of 0.075 \ig/\. Sample #4 from the lower part of the dump had diethylphthalate at
an estimated level of 0.28 jxg/1.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 53 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Traces of dibenzofuran (combustion product) were estimated at 0.009 ug/1 in the upper aqueous
sample 2, but were not found in Station #4 lower in the dump site drainage.
Both water samples from the dump revealed the presence of residues of the chlorinated organic
compound, bicyclo {2.2.1}hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic acid, 1,4,5,6,7,7-hexacHoro-, also known
as chlorendic acid. It was estimated at 0.49 ug/1 in Sample #2, and at 0.56 ug/1 in Sample #4.
Traces of the broad spectrum fungicide and wood preservative, PCP, were found in both water
samples from the dump site drainage. PCP was estimated at 0.022 ug/1 in Sample #2, and at
0.024 ug/1 in Sample #4 taken downstream. Both findings are well below the EPA risk based
concentration of 0.56 ug/1 for tap water (51), as well as below the MCL of 1 ug/1 (53). Both are
also below the EPA freshwater criteria for aquatic life of 20 (acute) and 13 (chronic) ug/1, for
PCP (57). In view of the long historical use of PCP in wood treatment, such levels in water from
a dump site drainage pathway would not appear unusual.
Toxaphene, a complex and somewhat persistent chlorinated camphene with a long history of use
as a "dip" for livestock, was estimated in Sample #2 at 0.82 ug/1. This is below EPA's drinking
water MCL of 1 ug/1 for toxaphene (53). However it exceeds EPA's risk-based toxaphene
concentration for tap water (conservatively modeled from animal data, using carcinogenic slope
factor and numerous statistical assumptions), which is 0.061 ug/1 (51). Toxaphene was not
measured in the lower water sample from the dump drainage, nor was it found in any of the three
sediment samples. However, it should be noted in all sediments—especially Sample #1 and
Sample #5, the SQLs for toxaphene were unfortunately very high.
Tentatively identified organics (TICs) from all five dump samples are shown in Table 7.
6.1.5 Concurrent Environmental Investigations on the Reservation: The "livestock
dipping station"
The finding of low levels of a pesticide like toxaphene in the dump drainage water is not
altogether surprising, in an area where livestock ranching is common. As is the case with many
rural areas, at least one former ranching site near the Reservation is known to have contained a
"livestock dipping station". The property in question, located at 2406 Tokeland Road, was
purchased in 1994 by the Tribe to serve as a future housing development. In compliance with
various BIA and Inter-Tribal Housing Authority land use requirements, a site inspection was
performed by a private contractor in March,
1995, during which soil associated with the former dipping site was obtained and tested for
various organics and metals. The results indicated the presence (above background) of lead, total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), diesel, TPH-oil, and the following pesticides: heptachlor,
lindane, heptachlor epoxide, 4,4'DDD, 4,4'DDT, 4,4'DDE, and chlordane. This screening test did
not specifically include toxaphene. (58).
Based on these findings of pesticide residues, EPA Region 10's Office of Environmental Cleanup
tasked Ecology and Environment, Inc. to conduct a removal assessment at the site. This
assessment took place on August 13, 1996, concentrating on the area surrounding the cattle
dipping station (59). A total of four ground water samples and seven subsurface soil samples
(from zero to six feet below ground surface) were analyzed, using field screening immunoassay
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 54 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
test kits. To verify the field immunoassay results, two field representative soil /water duplicates
and additional soil and ground water samples were also sent to a commercial laboratory for
independent analysis for pesticide residues.
For the ground water samples, no pesticides were detectedlibove the instrument detection limits,
and metals appeared consistent with the background sample and with the geology of the area
(higher than normal arsenic concentrations). However, seven of the various soil samples
contained levels greater than the EPA Region III risk-based concentrations (51) for one or more
of following pesticides: alpha /beta /gamma /delta BHC; alpha /gamma chlordane; the DDT series,
and heptachlor /heptachlor epoxide.
A sample of the water taken directly from the dip tank revealed respective levels of alpha BHC
and delta BHC at levels of 0.23 and 0.21 ug/1.
Since the area is proposed as housing development for the Shoalwater Tribe, EPA Superfund
Technical Assessment and Response Team has recommended a removal action, based on the
concentrations of pesticides above the Region III risk based concentrations for soils, to reduce the
threat to human health and the environment (59).
6.1.6 Microbiology: Dump Site Water and Leachate
Table 8 shows results of microbiological analysis of three aqueous samples taken from various
points along the dump site drainage stream (see Figure 2).
Although E. coli numbers were comparable in both water samples, other bacterial indicators (total
and fecal coliforms, and enterococci) were present in highest numbers at the spring head located
at the origins of the small creek passing through the dump site (Station #16A). This may have
been due to some agitation of sediment at the time of collection, or to the presence of toxicants in
the leachate which can have bacteriostatic or bacteriocidal effects. Exposure to such substances
could significantly alter the numbers and types of bacteria present in the leachate and post-
leachate samples. In either case, there did not appear to be an abundance of indicators present in
the leachate.
The purpose of the anaerobic/aerobic ratio (Table 8) is to establish the condition of the dump. An
older, ideally operating dump that is composting well, should demonstrate a ratio of greater than
1. This ratio also describes the condition of the collected leachate, The area of the dump where
this leachate was collected (Station #15) was composed mainly of rusty appliances and old car
bodies. There appeared to be little organic material present. This collection station may not be
representative of the entire dump, but it was the only obvious site of leachate runoff.
Of interest is the presence of Clostridium perfringens at the leachate collection Station #15. Pure
isolates of this organism obtained from the leachate sample were tested for the presence of
enterotoxin by reverse passive latex agglutination (Oxoid-PET-RPLA toxin detection kit). In this
assay, Clostridium perfringens toxin was not detected. This organism is an opportunistic
pathogen, and a causative agent of wound infections in humans, including "gas gangrene". Its
presence is not indicative of anything in particular except perhaps continued anaerobic
decomposition and long term organic contamination. However, since the organism's presence has
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 55 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
been confirmed at this station, care should be taken to protect against puncture wounds if any
further sampling is done.
6.1.7 Conductivity Survey at the Dump Site
As part of the field measurements during sampling, an electrical conductivity survey of the stream
that traverses the base of the dump was made on February 21, 1995. The objective of the survey
was to use conductivity as an indicator to identify the extent of increased dissolved solids from.
dump leachate impacting the stream. Figure 7 shows the results of the survey. Six points were
measured in the stream, two in an eastern tributary, two in adjacent marsh ponds, and one in an
area of leachate discharging from the southern down gradient margin of the dump (Sample
Station #2 referred to as upper dump site). During sample collection on February 22, additional
measurements of conductivity and pH were measured at Station #2 (leachate/upper dump);
Station #4 (downstream/lower dump); and Station #5 (slough), and are shown in Figure 8.
The conductivity of the stream upgradient of the dump was 128 microsiemens (uS), comparable
to the value of 125 nS found in an eastern tributary unaffected by dump seepage (Figure 8). As
the stream traversed the base of the dump, conductivity increased to 160-174 uS indicating
increased concentrations of dissolved solids. Conductivity measurements of dump leachate at
sample Station #2 were 692-736 ^S, about 5-6 times the values for the stream upgradient of the
dump. Based on mass balance, the increase in stream conductivity below the dump, compared
with dump leachate, suggests that about 8% of the stream flow below the dump was contributed
by dump leachate. Conductivity measurements shown in Figure 8 for marsh ponds down gradient
of the dump suggest that they were also impacted by dump leachate, compared to ponds
upgradient of the dump.
Inspection of the major inorganic parameters (Table 5) shows that dump leachate at the time
sampled (Station #2) was a calcium bicarbonate water with a pH of about 7. As the stream that
traversed the dump approached tidewater (lower Station #4), the major ion content changed to a
sodium chloride water with a pH of 6.9. See section 6.4.1.2 for additional discussion of the
general inorganic characteristics of dump site water in comparison with other water types sampled
in this study.
6.2 Agricultural Runoff from Cranberry Bogs toward Tidelands (Figure 2, Tables 9 and
10)
6.2.1 Metals in Drainage Ditch Sediment (Table 9)
In general, metal residues noted in the two sediment samples from the cranberry drainage ditch
were all lower than those seen in the lower beach lagoon (Station #5), and markedly lower than
either of the sediment samples taken from the upper and mid portions of the dump site drainage.
With the exceptions of arsenic (slight elevation), and manganese and barium (levels remained
relatively constant), all metals in Sediment Sample #6 from the upper drainage ditch appeared in
concentrations less than those detected in sediment for the lower beach lagoon. Sediment.metals
also appeared to decline as a function of distance from the agricultural lands. Based on the more
seaward sediment sample (Station #8), nearly all metals had declined further from the
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 56of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
128 137 (pond)
692 (leachate)
160
167
549 (marsh)
Figure 7. Conductivity survey
of surface water at the dump
site, February 21,1995.
Values in microsiemens.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Page: 57 of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
station #5
slough
12,4007-
station #2
leachate
736/7.05
station #4
stream
174/6.89
SR105
Figure 8. Conductivity and pH
values above and below the
dump site, February 22,1995.
Values in microsiemens/pH units.
Revision3.0, January]?, 1997
Page: 58 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
concentrations noted at the upper part of the drainage path immediately below the cranberry bogs
upstream. Exceptions to this pattern were nickel (slight increase, from 8.57 to 10.7 mg/kg,
sodium (about a twofold increase, probably due to seawater intrusion and tidal influences), and
potassium (levels remained constant). Except for selenium, all sediment concentrations were
approximately within the mean sediment concentrations ("expected background") lisfecTby Bowen
(1979) (50). The selenium concentrations (an estimated 6.4 and 10 mg/kg) measured in the two
samples were 15 and 23 fold greater than Bowen's "expected background " concentration.
6.2.2 Pesticides in Drainage Ditch Sediment (Table 10)
Both of the sediment samples from the drainage ditch appeared relatively unremarkable in terms
of the variety and amounts of pesticide residues measured. The upper sediment sample (Station
#6) contained estimated concentrations of the herbicide dichlobenil (2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile;
casoron) at 10 jag/kg. Traces of dichlobenil were also estimated in the lower sediment sample
(Station # 8) at 1.5 jag/kg. Traces of the four major DDT metabolites were also noted in the
upper sample. The sum of these residues (total DDT) was estimated at 123.5 jag/kg (Table 10).
In the lower sediment sample (Station #8), only p,p'-DDD was found, at an estimated
concentration of 3 jag/kg. No other pesticide residues were found in either sediment sample, nor
were any other organic compounds measured.
6.2.3 Pesticides in Drainage Ditch Water (Table 10)
Somewhat paradoxically, both water samples displayed a much greater variety and extent of
pesticide contamination than did the corresponding sediment samples taken at the same place
(Figure 2 and Table 10). At the lower station (Sample #8), the substrate appeared to be a clear,
hard sand that may not have accumulated pesticide residues. This issue is explored in more detail
in later portions of this discussion.
6.2.3.1 Herbicides
As in the case of both sediment samples, both water samples showed traces of the herbicide
dichlobenil, measured at 1.9 jag/1, and 2.0 ng/1, respectively, in samples 7 and 9.
Dichlorbenzamide, which is a breakdown product of dichlobenil, was also noted at 0.14 jag/1 in
both water samples. Dichlobenil is registered as an herbicide for weed control in cranberry areas.
It is also sometimes intentionally applied to water. According to the Weed Science Society of
America, the halflife for dichlobenil in water under limited sunlight is 10.2 days (60). 96 hr LC50
for rainbow trout is from 4930 to 6260 jag/1 (60). Neither a drinking water MCL nor an ambient
water quality criterion exists for dichlobenil at this time. Since the levels noted in these water
samples are more than three orders of magnitude below the 96 hr LC50 for sensitive salmonids,
the levels of dichlobenil and dichlorbenzamide would not appear to be of concern.
The carbamate herbicide chlorpropham (isopropyl-3-chlorophenyl carbamate; CIPC) was also
noted in both water samples, at estimated levels of 0.1 ng/1 for each. According to the Farm
Chemicals Handbook, the LC50 for chlorpropham (rainbow trout) ranges from 3020 to 5700 jag/1
(61).
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 59 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Napropamide, a substituted amide herbicide with a typical field halflife of about 70 days (60), was
found in both water samples, at 0.2 jig/1. The Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society
of America indicates relatively low aquatic toxicity for this material citing a rainbow trout 96 hr
LC50 of 16,600 jig/1 (60).
The herbicide norflurazon was also measured in both samples (Station #7 at 1.0 jig/1 and Station
#9 at 0.78 jig/1). This herbicide has a moderate to long halflife of approximately 6 to 8 months in
aerobic aquatic conditions, according to the Herbicide Handbook (60). The 96-hr LC50 for
rainbow trout is listed at 8100 jig/1 (60).
Both water samples also contained residues of the herbicide, 2,4-D. 2,4-D was measured at 0.12
jig/1 in the upper ditch water and again in the lower ditch water sample at 0.091 jig/1. Ambient
water quality criteria for 2,4-D have not been established at this time. The EPA drinking water
MCL for 2,4-D is 70 jig/1 (53), and the EPA risk-based modeled estimate for permissible levels in
tap water is 61 jig/1 (51). The rainbow trout 96-hr LC 50 for the isooctyl ester of 2,4-D is greater
than 5000 jig/1. Comparable 96-hr toxicity levels for technical grade 2,4-D acid and 2,4-D-
dimethylamine salts are about 377,000 jig/1, and 250,000 jig/1, respectively (60).
Triclopyr ([(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid; garlon) was also estimated in both upper
(0.28 jig/1) and lower (0.023 jig/1) water samples from the cranberry runoff ditch. No drinking
water MCL or ambient water quality criterion have been established for this herbicide. Although
soil halflife averages about 30 days, triclopyr is rapidly degraded by photolysis in water, with a
halflife at 10 hours at 25 degrees C, producing trichloropyridinol as a major metabolite (60).
Chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms is quite variable, depending on the chemical species of
triclopyr in question. Rainbow trout 96 hr LC50 for the technical acid form of triclopyr is
117,000 jig/1, while the comparable LC50 for the triethylamine salt is only 552,000 jig/1. In
contrast, 96 hr rainbow trout LC50 for the butoxyethyl ester of triclopyr is 740 jig/1 (60).
6,2.3.2 Insecticides
DDT Series: Similar to the two sediment samples, p,p' ODD was estimated in both corresponding
water samples at 0.0088 jig/1 at (upper) Station #7, and again at 0.01 jig/1 at (lower) Station #9.
These levels exceed the Washington State Ambient Water Quality Standards of 0.001 jig/1 for
total DDT (62). No other residues of the DDT series were noted in the two water samples.
Carbamates: The systemic broad spectrum insecticide /nematicide, carbofuran (furadan; 2,3-
dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranyl methylcarbamate), was measured in both water samples at
0.43 jig/1 (Station #7), and 0.35 jig/1 (Station #9). Carbofuran has a drinking water MCL of 40
jig/1 (53). The EPA risk-based number for carbofuran in drinking water is 180 jig/1 (51). No
EPA ambient water quality criterion has been established for this pesticide. However, a Canadian
water quality guideline of 1.75 jig/1 has been noted in the available literature (63). The 96 hour
LC50s for carbofuran range from 240 jig/1 (bluegill) to 380 jig/1 (rainbow trout) (61).
Organophosphates: Significant findings for three organophosphate pesticides were noted in both
water samples. Of special concern was the detection of significant trace residues of the extremely
toxic cholinesterase inhibitor, azinphos-methyl (guthion), in both water samples. A level of 0.21
jig/1 was found in (upper) sample 7 and 0.22 jig/1 was measured in (lower) sample 9. These levels
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 60of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
are more than an order of magnitude above the chronic EPA ambient water quality criterion of
0.01 ug/1 for guthion (57), and likewise exceed water quality standards for the State of
Washington (62). Although no drinking water MCL has been established for guthion, its extreme
acute mammalian toxicity (oral rat; approximately 4 mg/kg)(61) makes it potentially one of the
most hazardous of all organophosphate pesticides in use today. Consequently, any residues in
surface water which might come in contact with aquatic life, or with incidental human wading or
swimming activity should be of concern.
Chlorpyrifos, which is of increasing environmental concern because of its relative persistence and
moderate to high toxicity, was also found in both samples. The upper water sample (Station #7),
was estimated at having 0.044 ug/1, and 0.046 ug/1 was estimated for the lower water sample
(Station #9). Both levels exceed the chronic Washington State Water Quality Standard of 0.041
ug/1 for this pesticide (62). The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has also recommended a
maximum concentration in ambient waters of 0.001 ug/1 for chlorpyrifos (64).
Diazinon, a moderately toxic organophosphate, was also measured in both water samples.
Sample #7 had 0.23 ug/1 diazinon, and Sample #9 contained 0.27 |ig/l. EPA has not established
ambient water quality criteria for this pesticide but the NAS has recommended a maximum
concentration of 9 ug/1 (64). EPA's lifetime health advisory for diazinon in drinking water is 0.6
ug/1 (53).
These findings confirm concurrent studies by the State of Washington, which during both 1994
(65) and 1995 (66) have measured these same three organophosphate pesticides in a similar
cranberry bog drainage at values which either exceed USEPA criteria or Washington State water
standards for water quality, or are in excess of the NAS recommendations for maximum
concentrations in surface waters. In 1994, the Washington State Pesticide Monitoring Program
also noted similarly excessive levels of these three pesticides in water samples collected
throughout much of the growing and harvest seasons from Grayland Ditch No. 1 (segment no.
WA-24-1030), which originates in Long Lake and flows to North Cove in Willapa Bay. Their
findings reported azinphos- methyl at 0.14 ug/1 in Grayland Ditch water during sampling in June,
1994 (65). (USEPA Water quality standard is 0.01 ug/1) (57). Their study also found
chlorpyrifos residues in Grayland Ditch water at 0.021 ug/1 (June, 1994), and again at 0.03 |ig/l
(October, 1994) (65). Although this is within the current Washington State water quality
standard of 0.041 |ig/l for this pesticide (62), it is well above the NAS recommended maximum
level of 0.001 |ig/l (64). The Washington State monitoring effort also measured diazinon residues
in Grayland Ditch at 0.011 ug/1 (April, 1994) and again at 0.029 ug/1 (October, 1994) (65). Both
values exceed the NAS recommended maximum concentration of 0.009 ug/1 (64).
During 1995, the Washington State pesticide water monitoring data for Grayland Ditch No. 1
continued to reveal consistently elevated concentrations of the same three organophosphate
pesticide residues (66). Azinphos-methyl was detected in the 1995 water samples at 0.21 ug/1
(June), 0.48 ug/1 (August), and 0.018 ug/1 (October). Respective 1995 (ug/1) findings for
chlorpyrifos in Grayland Ditch samples were 0.045 (April), 0.012 (June), 0.13 (August), and
0.016 (October). Comparable (ug/1) 1995 findings for diazinon were 0.014 (April) 0.22 (June),
0.68 (August), and 0.030 (October). The 1995 Washington State monitoring also revealed
consistently elevated levels of total DDT in the Grayland Ditch water samples. In ug/1, These
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 61 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
were: 0.019 (April), 0.014 (June), 0.020 (August), and 0.017 October) (66). All were well above
the Washington State water quality standard for total DDT, which is 0.001 ug/1 (62).
The question of "sediment": The above discussion makes it clear that significant pesticide
residues were found itf both water sampleslrom the cranberry drainage. However, a lingering
question about these findings is the relative absence of pesticide residues in either of the two
corresponding "sediment" samples (Table 10). Although most organophosphate pesticides are
relatively labile (with the exception of chlorpyrifos, which can remain in environmental media for
months), many if not all of the residues noted in water would be expected to also bind
preferentially to sediment.
Why, then, were so few pesticide residues noted from the two sediment samples in this study? A
possible explanation of this discrepancy is that the samples collected may have actually been
"hardpan", which had been swept clean of fine particulates, rather than sampling true stream
"sediment". While obtaining the field samples, it was noteworthy that the bottom of the drainage
ditch was very hard and firm, making it difficult to obtain any benthic material at all without great
effort in breaking into the hardpan surfaces. It is possible that fine sediment particles are simply
swept down the ditch, rather than being deposited uniformly on the bottom.
6.3 Tideflat Sediments and Shellfish associated with nearby tribal subsistence harvesting and
mariculture
6.3.1 Sediment Screening for Chemical Contaminants (Tables 11, 12, 13)
Originally, five samples of sediment (#10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) were obtained August 8, 1994,
from Willapa Bay tidelands (see Figure 3, Table 2). Two more intertidal sediment samples were
obtained for comparative purposes the following year. On February 21, 1995, sample #23
(tideland in South Bay off Grays Harbor), and February 22, 1995, sample #12A (a resampling of
Sample #12; the Swimming Hole), were obtained.
6.3.1.1 Metals (Table 11; Table 12)
The results of metal and organometal measurements in the six Willapa Bay sediment samples, and
the Grays Harbor "reference" sample #23 are shown in Tables 11 and 12. Sample #23 was also
measured as a field duplicate sample (see Appendix E). Organometal target compounds such as
methyl mercury, which were not measured in Willapa Bay sediment samples, are listed in
Appendix C, Table C-6.
In general, metal residues detected in all seven samples were unremarkable, well within reasonable
background, and well below existing sediment criteria (48),(67). An interesting finding was that
the Willapa Bay samples revealed lower residues than were noted in the single reference sediment
sample from Grays Harbor.
Organotin compounds were noted in trace levels at sediment samples #10 and #12 from Willapa
Bay. Sample #10 had an estimated 6.4 ug/kg of butyltin trichloride, and 8.8 ug/kg of tributyltin
chloride. The sample at Station #12 (Swimming Hole) contained 21.6 ug/kg of dibutyltin
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 62of89
-------
The Shodtwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
chloride, and an estimated 1.4 ug/kg of tributyltin chloride. No organotin residues were measured
when Sample #12 was resampled (as Sample #12A). The presence of organotins would not be
unexpected in such an area, because of the historic widespread use of organotin compounds in
anti-fouling paints on boat hulls. In terms of ecological effects to nontarget organisms, tributyltin
is most toxic, followed by dibutyl and monobutyl tins (68). ATfEslime, no specific sediment
criteria for the various organotins have been set for marine sediment. However, EPA Region 10
currently uses a guidance level for tributyltin; tentatively established at 30 ug/kg as total tin (dry
wt) (48),(69). The levels of organotins noted for the two Willapa Bay samples would not be
unexpected for sediment in typical harbors and marinas along Coastal Washington, but are
probably above what might be considered "background" for this relatively well-flushed area.
Methyl mercury was not measured in any sediment sample, but #12A showed a lower SQL of
5.76 ug/kg. The Grays Harbor sediment (#23) also showed a lower SQL (6.56 ug/kg). For the
remaining five Willapa samples, SQLs for methyl mercury were unfortunately all very high,
ranging from 110 to 170 ug/kg (see Appendix C, Table C-6). Therefore no information about
possible low levels of this compound could be obtained.
Because of the uncertainty about methyl mercury being present at all, it is difficult to speculate
further about any possible environmental impact.
6.3.1.2 Organics (Table 12; Table 13)
All seven Willapa sediment samples, as well as the reference sample from Grays Harbor, were
relatively unremarkable in terms of organic contaminants measured. Specific comments about
certain contaminants which were noted are as follow:
6.3.1.2.1 The Swimming Hole
Samples #12 and 12A were taken from the Swimming Hole (Figure 3, Table 12; Table 13), which
was of particular concern to the Tribe because of location very near the main Tribal Headquarters
and its frequent use by children and subsistence fishers. Station #12 sediment contained
(estimated) 4.0 ug/kg ethyl benzene, and 19.8 ug/kg carbon disulfide. Ethyl benzene is commonly
used in the process of making rubber, and is also a chemical precursor in the production of
styrene. No ethyl benzene was measured in the second sample taken from this station. Carbon
disulfide was also measured in #12 sediment, at 19.8 ug/kg. Although carbon disulfide is used in
large quantities worldwide as an industrial chemical intermediate, it also occurs naturally at trace
levels throughout the oceanic environment. Carbon disulfide is especially common in marshlands,
where it is produced by microbial reduction of naturally occurring sulfates. Therefore, such a
finding in nearshore marsh sediments is not surprising. However, carbon disulfide was not
measured in any of the other six sediment stations, from either Willapa Bay or Grays Harbor.
Traces of trichloromethane (chloroform) were estimated at 1.1 ug/kg in one of the two samples
from the Swimming Hole (Station #12A). Chloroform was also estimated at 0.06 ug/kg in the
Grays Harbor reference sample, but was not noted in any other samples. Since chloroform is not
only an industrial chemical but also a natural constituent of various plant material, it is difficult to
speculate on the source of this material. These estimated trace levels, found in only two of the
seven samples do not appear significant in terms of health or environmental risk.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 63 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
4-Methylphenol (p-cresol) was found in Sample #12A at 205 ug/kg, but was not measured in any
of the other six Willapa Bay sediments. Like trichloromethane, 4-methylphenol was also found in
the Grays Harbor reference sediment, at an estimated 54.6 ug/kg. Possible sources of this
chemical, especially the relatively high levels noted in the first sample taken from the Swimming
Hdl(T(but not the second sampltTof tHis same station) are difficult to speculate upon. 4-
methylphenol is a known constituent of automobile and diesel exhaust, and is a coal tar product.
However, it is also a natural product of plants. Although interesting, such trace levels are
probably not significant in terms of health or environmental risk from this exposure pathway. In
1994, hexachlorobenzene was also estimated at 10.3 ug/kg in the #12 swimming hole sample.
This chemical is a common chemical intermediate in many industrial processes such as the
manufacture of rubber and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastics. It is also utilized as a fungicide. In
1995, hexachlorobenzene was not measured in the sediment sample (#12A) taken previously
from the same station.
Retene, a resin acid commonly associated with wood pulp and paper processing, was also found
in Sample #12A, at an estimated 31.8 ug/kg. It was not found in the other sample from this same
station, nor was it found in any of the other four samples from Willapa Bay, or in the Grays
Harbor reference sample.
Pyrene, a PAH associated with combustion of organic materials, was estimated in Willapa Bay
Sediment Sample #10 at 17.2 ug/kg but was not measured in the other sediment samples.
Fluoranthene, another PAH associated with the combustion of organic matter, was estimated at
44.1 ug/kg in the Grays Harbor reference sample (#23).
6.3.1.2.2 Two Novel Halogenated Compounds: DBBA and DIB A
(see Table 12; see also Section 6.1.3.3)
As noted in the three previously discussed sediments from the dump site drainage (see Table 6,
Figure 2, Stations #2, #4, and #5), two unusual halogenated compounds were also measured in all
seven Tideland sediments. These two compounds were DBBA, and DIB A. Both were present in
all five original Willapa sediment samples collected on August 19, 1994. Both were also noted in
a sixth Willapa sample taken six months later, in February, 1995. Both were also found in
February 1995 "reference" sediment taken subsequently from Grays Harbor (Station #23).
As discussed previously, the mass spectral responses of the novel compounds DBBA and DIB A
and the synthetic herbicides, bromoxynil and ioxynil, are identical. However, for reasons
discussed later in this section, we hypothesize that these two compounds are most likely natural
products, rather than actual herbicide residues applied intentionally to the ecosystem as
xenobiotics (e.g., along roadsides to control weeds).
Concentrations of DBBA and DBBN in the original five Willapa samples, (August 19, 1994),
ranged from 10 ug/kg in Sample #13, to 205 ug/kg in Sample #12. Average concentration for
DBBA and DBBN in the six Willapa samples was 95.1 ug/kg. Concentrations of its iodinated
analogs, DIBA and DIBN, ranged from 44.0 (Sample #10) to 244.0 ug/kg (Sample #12), with a
mean concentration for the six Willapa samples of 153.5 ug/kg. Highest concentrations of all
four analogs were found in sediment Sample #12 (but declined in the repeat sample of this station,
#12A). Lowest concentrations for both compounds were found in Sample #13. In every Willapa
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 64 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
sediment sample except #12A (in which levels of DBBA and DIB A were much lower, and nearly
equal) concentrations of DBBA were always significantly greater than those of DIBA.
Because of the presence of these two apparent "herbicide" analogs in all of the initial five Willapa
sediments sampled in August of T9947six monthiTlater an additional two sediment sampler were
obtained for further verification, from both Willapa Bay (Station #12A) and a geographically
separate tideflats ecosystem (Grays Harbor; Station #23). (see Figures 1 and 3). Sample #12A
(Swimming Hole) was again determined to be positive for both DBBA and DIBA, although at
considerably lower levels than seen in the sample taken six months previously (#12) from that
station. Even more surprisingly, the Grays Harbor sediment (#23) also contained residues of the
same two compounds but in a reversed ratio from that usually seen the Willapa samples. Sample
#23 contained estimated concentrations of 231.0 ug/kg DBBA, and 167.0 ug/kg DIBA. Reasons
for reversal of this ratio in the Grays Harbor sediment are currently unknown.
• DBBA and DIBA: Natural Products?
As mentioned previously, the EPA mass spectral library tentatively identifies DBBA as an analog
of the synthetic herbicide, bromoxynil. It also identifies DIBA as analogs of the synthetic
herbicide, ioxynil. From our findings, however, it appears most likely that these four halogenated
compounds, DBBA, DBBN, DIBA, and DIBN, are natural products, rather than xenobiotic
compounds intentionally applied to the Willapa or Grays Harbor ecosystem as herbicides.
Reasons in support of this premise are as follow:
1. Estimated residues of the four analogs were found consistently in all six samples of
marine sediment from Willapa Bay, as well as in the totally unrelated marine sediment
sample taken from Grays Harbor; a separate large estuary thirty miles to the north.
2. The synthetic herbicides, bromoxynil and ioxynil, are known to photolyze and
biodegrade in the environment. Bromoxynil normally does not persist in surface or
sediments longer than six to eight weeks (70),(71),(72). Ioxynil is cited as having a
halflife in soil of less than two weeks (73). Even at different sampling times six months
apart, in late summer and mid-winter, both DIBA and DBBA were still always noted at
significant levels, in every sample. This does not argue for the presence of an intentionally
applied labile xenobiotic such as these two synthetic herbicides.
3. According to Meister (1996) (61), ioxynil is not marketed as a herbicide in the U.S. at
this time. Although bromoxynil is a common herbicide in U.S. agriculture, neither
substance is known to be utilized for rights-of way or agricultural purpose in the Willapa
Bay or Grays Harbor, or at the fall /winter season when samplings were conducted.
4. Traces of DBBA and DBBN were also noted in both sediment samples (#1 and #2; see
Table 6) from the (freshwater ecosystem) dump site drainage, as well as at 234 ug/kg in
the sediment from the lower (marine ecosystem) beach lagoon (Sample #5). Although
DIBA was not seen in the upper dump sample, the minimum level of detectibility for that
compound in that sample was 127 ug/kg. DIBA was, however found at 61 ug/kg in the
lower dump sediment, and at 70 ug/1 in the lower beach lagoon sediment (#5). Levels and
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 65of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
ratios of both DEB A and DBBA in the sediment sample (#5) from the lower beach lagoon
(dump site drainage) are consistent with those seen in all six tideflat sediments taken from
Willapa Bay per se. Such ubiquitous occurrence also argues in support of a natural
product hypothesis.
6.3.2 Microbiology
6.3.2.1 Shoahvater Bay Shellfish and Seawater Evaluation (Table 19)
The standard used by both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Washington
State DOH for regulating the consumption of molluscan shellfish is based on a fecal coliforms
standard targeted at the overlying seawater in which shellfish exist. For over twenty years this
standard has been based on a geometric mean (GM) most probable number (MPN) of 14 fecal
.coliforms /100 ml. Because of the variability of fecal coliforms in seawater, as measured by the
MPN method, numerous samples must be collected over a protracted period of time at various
stages of the tide before a valid evaluation can be made. Consequently, the collection of one
seawater sample and one shellfish sample can only give a brief snapshot of shellfish conditions at a
given sampling locale.
As shown in Table 19, razor clams collected at Willapa Bay's North Cove did exceed the market
standard for non-depurated shellfish as described by FDA (13). Since the Geometric Mean MPN
is used in establishing registered shellfish beds, the use of a single point test in determining the
quality of water /shellfish is not recommended. Further testing of the shellfish and overlying
seawaters would be required to more fully evaluate the microbial safety of the shellfish. The level
of fecal coliforms in nearby seawater was indeterminately low at <18 /100 ml.
Although total coliforms, enterococci, and marine heterotrophic plate counts (MHPC) are not
covered by either FDA or Washington State DOH shellfish growing water regulations, their
occurrence in seawater can often help delineate the "freshness" of coliform contamination and the
effects of rain water or snow melt runoff. The closer together the total coliform and fecal
coliform values become, the more likely that contamination is due to recent fecal sources.
Conversely, the farther apart total coliform and fecal coliform values become, the more likely that
contamination is due to recent soil runoff.
Although based upon a single data set, the low total coliform and fecal coliform values found in
seawater at all three locations (Table 19) indicate a soil runoff issue rather than a nearby fecal
source. However, more samples collected during or following a major rainfall event could
substantially alter this preliminary finding.
Another useful indicator of fecal contamination is the enterococcus group. Like fecal coliforms,
they indicate the presence of fecal contamination from warm blooded animals, but unlike fecal
coliforms, they survive longer in seawater. The combination of high numbers of enterococci, low
fecal coliforms and elevated total coliform measurements in littleneck clams collected from the
Tribal shellfish harvesting area point to long term contamination from aquatic animals and/or
insects possibly associated with nearshore vegetation. The high concentration of marine
microorganisms revealed via MHPC, tends to further confirm this observed association.
Revision 3,0, January 17,1997 Page: 66 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table 19. Microbiology Measurements of Shellfish and Nearby Seawater Samples
Station Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample Number
Total coliform
100g/ml
Fecal coliformXE coli
100g/ml
Enterococci
Cl/100gorml
Marine
HPC/ 1 g or ml
17
Tideflat mar Cedar
River, Oyster Bed
Oysters
85200021
78
«18
<18
17,000
17
Tideflat near
Cedar River,
Oyster Bed
Nearby Seawater
95200020
20
<18
<18
2,500
18A
SBIR, Shellfish
Harvesting
Area
UBfeneck Clams
95200025
2,400
<18
2,800
18,200
18A
SBIR, Shellfish
Harvesting
Area
Nearby Seawater
95200024
20
<18
<18
900
18B
Willapa Bay, Nortrt
Cove Beach
Razor Clams
95200023
230
230
790
250
18B
Willapa Bay,
North Cove
Beach
Nearby Seawater
95200022
<18
<18
<18
25
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 67 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Not surprisingly, the highest concentration of all bacterial indicators was found in shellfish rather
than nearby seawater. Bivalve shellfish, being filter feeders, have the ability to concentrate
bacterial contaminants more than ten times above ambient background levels (74).
6.3.2.2 Occurrence of Microbial Contaminants in Tribal "Swimming Hole" (Table 20)
In Washington State, the bacteriological standard for recreational waters is fecal coliforms, and is
based on a GM of 200 7100 ml and collection of a minimum of 5 samples per week. Because of
the variability of the MPN method, numerous samples must be collected over an extended time at
various stages of the tide, before a valid evaluation can be made. Therefore, collection of a single
sample, as was done in this evaluation, will provide only an estimate of the actual risk. As shown
in Table 20, the sample collected from the "Dexter-by-the-Sea" station (Sample #12) met State
recreational standards for fecal coliforms. Conversely the second sample near Davis house
exceeded the State standards for fecal coliforms.
The EPA recreational standard for E. coli in fresh water is a GM of 126 /100 ml, assuming at
least 5 samples are collected per week. Generally speaking, the use of an E. coli standard for
marine waters is not recommended. However, in instances such as Station #12A, located north of
the "Swimming Hole", where the fecal coliform and E. coli numbers are equivalent, these results
further confirm that the bacterial contamination is of fecal origin rather than from soil or wood by-
products.
The EPA recreational standard for enterococci in marine water is a GM of 35/100 ml, assuming at
least 5 samples are collected per week. As shown in Table 20, neither seawater sample exceeded
recreational standards for enterococci. As a general rule, septic drainfield waste will contain a
Table 20. Microbiological Measurements of Swimming Area Samples
Station
Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample
Number
Fecal coliforms
#/100ml
E. coli
moo mi
Enterococci
#100 ml
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
12
SBIR,
Swimming Hole,
Dexter-by-the-Sea
Water
94350125
12
12
<1
<1
12A
SBIR,
Swimming Hole,
near Davis House
Water
94350126
570
570
13
<1
Transportation
Blank
Water
94350127
<1
<1
<1
<1
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Page: 68 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
higher proportion of fecal coliforms than enterococci, as its bacterial load. This is further
indication that the fecal contamination seen in the northern sample is a result of a faulty drainfield
system rather than fresh fecal waste from wildlife.
Pseudomonasaeruginosais an olrgani^Th^n¥^i6iquitoiis^irrnatufe and is considered all
opportunistic pathogen that can cause nasopharyngeal and skin infections. For this reason, its
presence is tested for in swimming pools and water parks. The single sample standard in these
recreational waters, is 1/100 ml. At present, no standard exists for natural bodies of water and the
applicability of this standard to seawaters is uncertain. Table 20 demonstrates that if this standard
is applicable to seawater samples, neither sample exceeds this level.
In conclusion, the sample of the actual swimming hole (Station #12; Dexter-by-the-Sea; Table 20)
met recreational standards for swimming waters. However, the sample selected north of the
swimming hole demonstrated evidence of recent fecal contamination and may be the site of a
faulty septic system.
6.3.3 Aquatic Ecosystem Health: Shellfish Gonadal Histopathology Preliminary Screening
Bioassay: "Swimming Hole" and North River /Smith Creek Junction
It is well established in the literature that there has been an increase in the numbers and types of
tumors in fish and shellfish in the past several decades. In most cases, the increase in tumors and
a variety of other pathologic conditions can be correlated with increases in aquatic toxicant levels
(75),(76),(77). Two recent epidemiologic investigations identified the prevalence of gonadal
cancers as high as 40 % i'n softshell clams Mya arenaria in Maine (75), and 60 % in hardshell
clams Mercenaria spp. in Florida (78). A second study of these same geographic regions
identified human cancer mortality rates due to ovarian cancer as significantly greater than the
national average (79). The research and epidemiologic evidence has shown that the appearance of
significant numbers of tumors in these clams (and humans) is correlating to increased use of
herbicides and agrochemicals used in forestry and citrus farming. Since the softshell clam is a
good molluscan indicator species, it was decided that populations indigenous to Willapa Bay
could be studied in an effort to begin to characterize general "ecosystem health" near the
Shoalwater Bay Reservation. A histopathological study of softshell clams was examined by
EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, at
Narragansett, Rhode Island. In September of 1995, 24 specimens were collected at the
"Swimming Hole", located within the Shoalwater Bay Reservation. In addition, 27 specimens
were obtained from the North River and Smith Creek junction at the point of entry into Willapa
Bay.
No tumor bearing clams were found at either site. Based on statistical probability, if the
prevalence rate of gonadal tumors was greater than 5-6 % for these Willapa Bay populations, one
would have expected to see at least one tumor- bearing clam. Therefore, if a disease exists then
the prevalence rate is not statistically likely to exceed 5-6 % (80). Although this is only a
preliminary sampling of a molluscan indicator species, the lack of any tumors is supportive of a
relatively "clean" environment in terms of xenobiotic chemical stressors and ecosystem health.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 69 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited'Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
6.4 Drinking Water: Household Sampling
Limited studies of tribal drinking water sources have been conducted in the past as part of water
resources investigations, for example by Lum (1984) (81), and Ebbert and Payne (1984) (82). A
comprehensive study involving all water supplies used by tribal members both on and nearbythe
reservation, however, has yet to be undertaken.
6.4.1 Chemistry: Tap Water Screening for Lead and Inorganic Parameters (Tables 14, 15,
and 16; Appendix C)
Drinking water station locations are designated by numbers keyed to Figures 4, 5, and 6. Station
descriptors are used to designate clusters of samples in different areas at the Reservation as
follows: "Reservation-West", along SR 105, "Reservation-Center", on SR 105 near the
intersection with Tokeland Road, "Reservation-East" on Tokeland Road, and "Reservation- .
Annex" above SR 105. Sample descriptors are also used for designating samples obtained from
the nearby communities of Westport, Grayland, South Bend, and Ocosta.
• Lead
Results for lead are listed in Tables 14 and 15. Low concentrations of lead were detected in 22 of
32 samples (69%) sampled by the "first-pour" technique (Table 14). None of these samples
contained lead exceeding the action level of 15 ug/1 established by the Safe Drinking Water Act
(53). The highest lead concentration was 6.28 ug/1, measured in Sample #25, located in the
"Reservation-East" area. Nine additional samples had "first-pour" lead concentrations ranging
from 1 to 5 mg/1, and twelve samples had lead concentrations between 0,5 ug/1 and 1 ug/1.
Low concentrations of lead were found in only two of the 19 stations sampled after flushing the
distribution system. Both of these stations had concentrations between 0.5 ug/1 and 1 ug/1.
Table 14 shows a comparison of 13 stations which were sampled by both the "first-pour" and the
"flushed" technique. The lower "flushed" lead values in this comparison indicate that flushing is
effective in reducing lead concentrations. The samples which had lead concentrations greater than
1 ug/1 in first-pour samples include both on and off-Reservation systems (see Figures 4-6, Table
14). In either case, more samples at additional points along the distribution lines are needed to
determine whether the source of lead is in household pipes or in the distribution systems.
• Complete Inorganics (Tables 15 and 16)
Tables 15 and 16 list results for the complete inorganic analyses conducted at 19 drinking water
stations. Figure 9 shows the major cations and anions in a trilinear diagram (after Piper, 1944)
(83). Inspection of Figure 9 indicates the main water types are calcium bicarbonate
and calcium-sodium bicarbonate waters. The pH of samples ranged from 7.0 to 8.8 (Table 16).
Electrical conductivity ranged from 130 to 360 uS. Summation of measured analytes indicates
that dissolved solids range from 60 to 170 mg/1.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 70 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
The lowest dissolved solids for any of the water systems sampled was measured for the South
Bend sample (Station #44), the only station served by a surface water source. The highest
dissolved solids sources were the Westport water system sample (Station #47), the private wells
for a Bay Center business (Station #45), and the Toke Point well (Station #50). The higher
dissolved solids at the Westport and Toke Point samples is accompanied by somewhat elevated
sodium and boron, indicating a minor but measurable influence of marine water.
Samples from the main Reservation water system have a relatively more narrow pH range of 7.7
to 8.8, with electrical conductivities ranging from 170 to 174 jiS. Summation of analytes reveals
a dissolved solids content of 104 to 106 mg/1. In general, the Reservation Annex samples are
similar in proportions of major ions but somewhat higher in dissolved solids (about 118 mg/1).
No exceedances of primary drinking water standards, other than total coliforms (as discussed in
the following section on Microbiology), were detected at any of the drinking water stations
sampled in this survey.
Secondary drinking water standards, however, were exceeded for manganese at six stations, and
for iron at five stations, as listed below (Table 17). Secondary drinking water standards have
been developed for aesthetic purposes such as staining, taste and color. The secondary drinking
water standards for manganese and iron are 50 jig/1 and 300 jig/1, respectively (53).
Of those samples that exceeded secondary standards for manganese or iron, two were located at
the main Reservation (Station #48) and Toke Point (Station #50) wellheads, and two (Stations
#38 and #39) were at the annex buildings. The remaining three exceedances were found at off-
Reservation stations served by private wells (see Table 15). These were Stations #41 and #42 at
Ocosta, and Station # 45 at Bay Center. The highest iron concentration (4930 jig/1) was found at
the main Reservation well; Station #48. Since concentrations at all residence taps sampled on the
main Reservation distribution system were less than 22 jig/1, the water treatment used for the
Reservation system appears to effectively remove iron prior to distribution.
6.4.2 Microbiology: Source Water Screening for Microbiological Contaminants from
Leaking Septic Systems (Figures 4-6, Tables 17 and 19)
As shown in Table 4, drinking water from each home or building sampled in October 1995, for
lead and inorganic parameters was also sampled for microbiological contaminants. However,
unlike the previously discussed samples collected for analysis of lead and other inorganics, which
were always taken directly from an inside user tap at each station, samples collected for
microbiological testing were preferentially taken at an outside source at each house or building.
This is routinely done to avoid the possibility of microbiological contamination by human
activities near, for example, a kitchen, bathroom, or laundry faucet. Unfortunately, Sample
Stations # 34 and #42 lacked an outside source, making it necessary to collect microbiological
samples at these two locations from indoor taps.
As shown in Figure 6, three wells provide drinking water to the homes / buildings located on the
Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation. Well #2, treated by chlorination, provides water to the
majority of the homes on the reservation The other two wells provide water to only one or two
homes /buildings and are apparently untreated.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 71 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
To our knowledge no prior studies have been conducted on possible microbiological
contamination of drinking water systems at the level of individual households or buildings in the
Shoalwater Bay area. However, in 1993 EPA Region 10 did collect and analyze drinking water
samples from the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation Well #2, and performed microbiological
analyses for total /fecal coliforms, HPC, w\^GiardiaTll^ryptosp6ri3.ium. These samples were
collected from the well prior to chlorination (9),(10),(11). The samples were negative for all
routinely sought chemical and microbiological analytes at that time. Since the 1993 sampling, it
has been reported that all distribution lines supplying buildings from this well have been replaced.
In this study of individual households/buildings in the area, a total of 38 bacteriological samples
(including two transfer/transport blanks) were collected from 36 stations both on and off the
Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation. All but two (Station #34 and Station #42) were taken from
appropriate outside sources at each station. Locations of the drinking water microbiological
samples, obtained from the Shoalwater Bay area on October 23 and 24, 1995, are shown in
Figures 4-6. Microbiological results are shown in Table 18.
None of the drinking water samples tested positive for fecal coliforms (Table 18). However, five
samples were found positive for total coliforms. These were Samples #31(1 colony forming unit
(CPU) 7100 ml, #34 (1/100 ml), #35 (1/100 ml), #36 (3/100 ml), and #42 (1/100 ml). Three of
the positive samples (#31, #35, and #36) were located on the Shoalwater Bay Reservation.
Sample #34 was taken from a private residence in Grayland, and Sample #42 came from a private
residence in Ocosta (Figure 5).
Because of the positive results on the initial sampling, these five positive stations were sampled
again three months later, on January 22, 1996. Again, no sample was found positive for fecal
coliforms. In this resampling effort, Sample #35 no longer showed any evidence of total
coliforms. However, the remaining four stations still showed positive levels for total coliforms.
These were: Sample #31 (1 sample out of four was positive; 2/100 ml); Sample #34 (4 samples
out of four positive; 1/100 ml); Sample #36 (1 sample out of 4 positive, 1/100 ml); and Sample
#42 (1 sample out of 4 positive, 1/100 ml).
Sample #31 was the only home supplied by Well #2 (chlorinated) which tested positive for total
coliforms (1/100 ml) at the initial sampling in October; see Table 18)). When resampled in
January, 1995, one of four repeat samples of the Station #31 household again tested positive for
total coliforms, as described above. Although a "trace" (<0.1 mg/l) of free chlorine was detected
in Sample #31, this home is apparently located at the end of the distribution system.
Consequently, it appears likely that the design of the treatment system may be unable to maintain
an adequate level of disinfection at this point in the distribution system. Ideally, most chlorinated
systems should be designed to maintain at least a 0.2 mg/l residual of free chlorine throughout the
system.
The remaining two initially total coliform positive samples on Shoalwater Bay property consisted
of two buildings, identified as Sample Stations #35 and #36 (Table 18, Figure 6), which are
supplied by a single, separate well. This source appears to be unchlorinated, since chlorine
residuals from both buildings were not detected (<0.1 mg/l). Both collection stations tested
positive at initial sampling for total coliforms at low levels but were negative for fecal coliforms
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 72 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
and E. coli. Repeat sampling in January from both of these locations confirmed that bacterial
contamination was still present at Sample Station #36 but not at Station #35.
Eight of the thirty six collection stations were located off the Reservation; in various of the
neighboring^reas^f Westport^ Grayland~ Ocosfa, and SbuthTBehdT Of these, two tested positive^
for total coliforms, in both the initial sampling and the repeat sampling three months later. Sample
#34 was a residence in Grayland which receives water from the Grayland water utility. Sample
#42 was a residence in Ocosta which receives water from a private well. Neither station had
detectable chlorine residuals, or an outside sampling point. As discussed previously, respective
samples for microbiology were thus necessarily collected from the laundry room sink faucet (for
Sample #34; Grayland) and from the bathroom sink faucet (for Sample # 42; Ocosta). Since
indoor faucets and sinks are often contaminated by various indoor human activities, sampling
from these locations is discouraged unless no other outside sources can be found. It thus would
appear highly likely that the total coliforms contamination found at both stations, at both initial
and repeat sampling times, is a direct consequence of having to obtain both samples from an
indoor tap.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 73of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Percent of Total
Milliequivalents per Liter
Figure 9. Water types differentiated by major cations and anions.
Reservation drinking water is clustered in the subcircular area.
Surface water from the dump site and cranberry drainage ditch
is shown in the oblong areas.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Page: 74 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 CONCLUSIONS
EPA's examination of four major environmental exposure pathways in the vicinity of the
Shoalwater Bay Tribe, utilizing relatively few samples, can not provide absolute answers about
whether environmental contaminants are in fact contributing to the recently documented Tribal
health problems. However, evidence generated by the present study would make this possibility
seem quite unlikely.
Two other important environmental exposure pathways for the Shoalwater Bay area, air and
ground water, were not examined in this report. For reasons described below, their possible
impacts on the Willapa ecosystem should be explored further.
Conclusions from this investigation of the four exposure pathways can be summarized as follows:
7.1.1 Dump Site
From the results of this preliminary screening investigation, it does not appear that the waste
stream from the abandoned dump site near the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation poses a
significant health or environmental risk.
7.1.2 Tideflats
The limited data from this study show the Willapa sediment samples to be relatively clean and well
within normal background for contaminants normally associated with such areas. However,
certain tideflats-related contaminant issues merit further consideration:
• Mercury and Methyl mercury
Methyl mercury is the most important form of mercury in terms of toxicity, especially to the fetus
of mothers exposed to methyl mercury during pregnancy (68). In the aquatic environment,
virtually any mercurial compound may be changed to methyl mercury by microbial activity (84).
Accordingly, it is also the mercury species of special concern in any aquatic ecosystem where
disposal of mercury wastes has occurred.
In this study, the laboratory techniques utilized could not detect methylmercury and other
organomercury compounds in the sediment samples at sufficiently low levels to draw direct
conclusions about their presence or effect. However, the average concentration of total mercury
in the earth's crust is estimated by Jonasson (1970) at 0.080 mg/kg (85). For all seven tideflat
sediment samples, our analytical capabilities for detecting total mercury were in all cases at least
0.05 mg/kg (50 ug/kg; 50 ppb) or lower. In two samples, the levels for total mercury were
higher, resulting in the two positive measurements of 0.0222 mg/kg (Sample #12A; Table 11) and
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997 Page: 75 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
0.0445 mg/kg (Sample #23). Although we could not specifically measure methyl mercury in this
study, the relatively low levels for total mercury in the two positive sediments, plus our generally
low MDLs for total mercury in the remaining sediments provide very strong assurance that methyl
mercury is not a likely problem in this immediate ecosystem.
• Novel Halogenated Compounds in Sediment
The presence of the bromo- and iodo- compounds with instrumental responses identical to
bromoxynil and ioxynil at relatively uniform levels throughout the estuary was unanticipated but
not particularly surprising. Seawater contains a multitude of bromo- and iodo- compounds
(54),(55). However, the presence of these compounds in the dump drainage was unexpected.
From the evidence at hand, it appears that these two materials are marine natural products. It is
unlikely that they represent xenobiotic compounds, hazardous waste, or similar materials
intentionally added to the Willapa Bay ecosystem. However, because they were found in the dump
site sediment and because the structure of these compounds appears to be very similar to two
herbicide compounds, further research is needed to identify and characterize them.
• Carbaryl and Glyphosate
Carbaryl and glyphosate are sprayed on the tideflats to (respectively) eradicate ghost shrimp and
Spartina sea grass. Carbaryl is not a persistent pesticide, and is degraded via both photolysis and
microbial activity in sediments and water, especially under conditions of basic pH (86),(87),(88).
However, until breakdown occurs and flushing and other natural processes can replenish the
normal intertidal fauna, the spraying is acutely lethal to virtually all invertebrates, nekton and
plankton living in or passing through the immediate spray zones. This includes crab zoea, larval
fishes, and other critical life stages of various key resources in the Bay. Although much less
acutely toxic to nontarget species than carbaryl, glyphosate is often used in concert with various
surfactants, which have high aquatic toxicities. While neither of these compounds was detected in
the sediment samples collected for this study, the timing of field sampling events precluded the
collection of tideflat samples at appropriate timeframes immediately following any scheduled
chemical application episodes.
7.1.3 Cranberry Bog Drainage
This exposure pathway is an obvious problem within the general Willapa Bay ecosystem. Several
pesticide residues detected in the runoff from this area are sufficiently high to be in violation of
federal and state water quality standards. The theoretical risk from such organophosphates as
azinphos-methyl is considerable, not only to nontarget organisms but possibly to humans or
animals who might swim in the ditch, or drink surface water in the immediate area during periods
of application in the upstream bogs. Residues of the less toxic but more persistent
organophosphate, chlorpyrifos, are also an apparent problem in the pesticide drainage ditch.
Exposure of organisms to mixtures of various pesticide residues in the runoff is also an issue
which merits further assessment.
Pesticide runoff from fanning areas raises other concerns beyond the scope of this study such as
contaminated sediment fate and transport, the long term impact of pesticide laden water runoff
Revision3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 76of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
and sediment deposition on tidelands, and whether vulnerable ground water resources are being
impacted.
7.1.4 Drinking Water
• Lead
From the results of this examination of household taps, lead in drinking water is not a problem for
the Reservation and associated areas at this time. "First-pour" water samples in indoor household
taps show a slight elevation for lead compared to samples taken after periods of normal flow, a
typical response for older plumbing systems. However, in no case was a violation of the EPA
lead action level of 0.015 mg/1 observed.
• Organics
Although the current investigation did not analyze for pesticides and other organics in Tribal
household drinking water systems, a 1993 EPA analysis of a single sample from the main wellhead
(EPA, 1993) for organics was unremarkable (9),(10),(11).
• Microbiology
Low levels of total coliforms were found at five of 36 stations. Of the five stations found positive
for total coliforms, three were on the Shoalwater Bay Reservation, one was in the neighboring
Ocosta area, and one was in Grayland. The presence of consistently low numbers of total
coliforms, in the absence of fecal coliforms, indicates an outside contamination source, either in
the distribution system or the wellhead. The lack of fecal coliforms indicates that the source of
contamination is not from fresh fecal contamination, but may be from soil contamination entering
the distribution system of the well through infiltration or fractures. All five stations also had trace
or no detectable levels of chlorine. Based on the chlorine and coliform test results, the
Reservation-West and Dexter areas have insufficient chlorination to treat the bacteria in the
systems.
Station #34 (Grayland) was repeatedly positive for total coliforms (4/4; Table 18). If follow up
drinking water samples from this suspect station continue to show positive total coliforms, with
negative results from other stations in the distribution system, then it is likely that the
contamination is the result of a domestic or other non-distribution system plumbing problem.
7.1.5 Livestock Dipping Station
Preliminary analyses by the EPA Region 10 Superfund program, of ground water underlying the
former livestock dipping station appear unremarkable (58), (59), in spite of the chemical
contamination in the overlying soil. However, additional testing of ground water, for a greater
variety of residues and at lower detection levels, is clearly warranted.
Soil exceedances of EPA risk-based concentrations for several persistent organochlorine
pesticides were noted for the former dip site, in seven of the various soil samples ranging from the
surface down to a depth of six feet. Therefore, the EPA Region 10 Superfund Technical
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 77of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Assessment and Response Team has recommended a removal action for the contaminated site.
Based on currently available information, this would involve the removal of approximately 555
cubic yards of pesticide-contaminated soils, 2000 gallons of pesticide-contaminated water inside
the cattle dipping tank, and the potentially pesticide-contaminated debris associated with the
corratand the^ipp1ngtankr(59)
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 78 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
It should be emphasized that the various environmental exposure pathways at Willapa Bay impact
not just the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, but the entire Willapa Bay ecosystem. It is important
that this ecosystenTbeTecognized and treated as arcomplex and unique area, rich in natural
resources but beset with increasing conflict about land use planning and natural resource
utilization.
The movement or drift of pesticides beyond the boundaries of the targeted application, is a
universal concern in areas where competing land use practices and natural resource utilization
frequently intersect. It is an issue of central importance to the highly productive Willapa Bay
ecosystem, where pesticides are applied not only to surface water and to soil, but also via aircraft
to selected tidelands.
In this limited assessment, two important exposure pathways, Air and Ground Water, were not
examined. Because of the nature of the Shoalwater Bay - Willapa Bay ecosystem and the
likelihood of transboundary migration of xenobiotic contaminants into these two environmental
media, both pathways should receive further scrutiny.
With these general issues in mind, EPA suggests the following areas for future environmental
research:
• Ground Water
• Vulnerable ground water resources underlying areas of application and pesticide
runoff from cranberry bogs should be screened for pesticides and organics.
• Air
Air is a Shoalwater-Willapa exposure pathway that has not been explored. For most of
the year, the airshed over Willapa Bay appears to be relatively pristine, free from major
inversions and urban pollutant sources. Although the Reservation and surrounding areas
are very rural, spraying in the tideflats, cranberry fields and possibly locations near the
Reservation may be creating some exposures.
Inhalation Exposures: A lingering and complex issue for the Shoalwater Bay area and
other parts of greater Willapa Bay is the aerial spraying of carbaryl on adjacent tidelands
during summer months, to facilitate the commercial propagation of shellfish. The
inhalation exposure to Tribal members and other residents of living around the Bay during
pesticide/herbicide application events is unknown.
• Some limited air monitoring of likely worse-case areas is recommended during
aerial pesticide application events.
Air / Tideland Interface: Carbaryl and Other Pesticides (Ecological Effects):
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 79of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995 .
The air pathway not only poses the risk of episodes of acute inhalation and dermal
exposure of humans, birds and other terrestrial life to ambient concentrations of carbaryl in
the area, but it also interfaces directly with the intertidal zone, the prime target of the
spraying.
• We recommend further studies of the long term ecological impact of carbaryl on
nontarget aquatic organisms in the area.
• To break the pattern of persistent stressing of micro communities within the
estuary, State and federal agencies and extension scientists should work with
shellfish farmers to develop less draconian methods of controlling mud shrimp
populations.
» Tideflats
Novel Halogenated Compounds (sediment): Because the unusual bromo- and iodo-
compounds were found in the dump site sediments outside the immediate influence of the
marine environment and because they so closely resemble two known herbicides,
additional investigation would allow a better understanding of the source, fate and impact
of these compounds.
• It is strongly recommended that further research be directed to the occurrence of
these novel compounds, to elucidate their structures, sources, function and
potential impact.
Methyl mercury (sediment): Total mercury results were not elevated above background in
any of the seven sediment samples, suggesting that highly toxic organomercurials are not
an issue of concern in the general Shoalwater Bay marine ecosystem. However, SQLs for
methyl mercury were insufficient to obtain specific information about levels of this toxic
compound.
• To more fully augment and strengthen the database for organomercury compounds
in Bay sediment for this area, additional Willapa Bay sediment samples should be
obtained and analyzed for organomercury.
Carbaryl and Glyphosate (sediment /biota):
• Sediment samples should be collected reasonably adjacent to the application areas
immediately after spraying to determine if short-term sediment loading is
occurring.
• The general use of such intentionally applied pesticides in the Willapa ecosystem,
should be examined closely for possible nontarget effects (see Air).
• Cranberry Bog Pesticides
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 80of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Pesticide Fate and Transport Via Sediment: Data from only two sampling stations did not
provide enough information to assess the loading of pesticides in sediment, and where the
sediment goes.
^/ A^h^Te^SensiveTtudy of "tfieatitire~cfanbefry Drainage is necessary to determine
the extent of sediment contamination and the destination of contaminated
sediment.
Aquatic Bioassays:
• In-stream monitoring, especially via aquatic bioassays, should be performed to
determine the cumulative effects of the use of different pesticides and herbicides in
the cranberry growing area.
Tissue: While sediment and water residue chemistry did not suggest major problems, no
tissue samples were collected for the purpose of determining tissue loading or
bioconcentration of the chemicals of concern.
• Inasmuch as bioconcentration mechanisms are not fully understood, selective
analysis of some sustenance organisms, particularly those impacted by the
exposure to cranberry runoff, might be revealing.
Livestock Dipping Station
Because of the urgent need for new Tribal housing on the Reservation, it is strongly
recommended that EPA Superfund proceed swiftly to ensure that the proposed soil removal and
remediation at the former livestock dipping site take place as soon as possible. This process
should also include appropriate human health risk and exposure assessments following the
cleanup, to ensure that the site is suitable for public housing, particularly for occupancy by
children, pregnant women and similar high-risk groups.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 81 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
7.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND
TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Drinking Water
Lead: The data indicate that flushing household taps prior to using the water for drinking
or cooking is an effective method to reduce lead concentrations.
• Educational efforts should be undertaken to encourage this practice.
Microbiology: Since the EPA Total Coliform Rule is based on a presence /absence
concept, a drinking water system positive for coliforms remains in non-compliance
regardless of the numbers of coliform present. Continued monitoring of microbiological
contaminants should probably be performed in certain areas.
• Assuming that the two off-Reservation (#34 and #42) stations were total coliforms
positive due to the poor collection points (circumstances necessitating the
collection of samples from taps inside the home, rather than outside), these homes
should be further studied to insure positive results were the consequence of a poor
collection point and not because of contaminated drinking water. The three
Reservation collection points (Stations #31, #35, and #36) that tested positive at
outside taps are of more concern.
• It is recommended that the Grayland total coliforms positive station located off SR
105 (Sample #34) be incorporated into the local utility's monthly drinking water
monitoring program.
• Further evaluation of the private well located in Ocosta (Sample #42) should
include additional testing. If additional samples collected at various points
throughout this private system continue to be positive for total coliforms, an on-
site evaluation of the system starting at the well head and storage tank should be
performed.
• If future ground water contamination by pesticides is indicated or predicted by
future studies, it is recommended that a program of episodic testing of main
drinking water wellhead(s) for organics and pesticide residues be implemented.
Tideflats
Tideflats Microbiology (shellfish/seawater): Fecal contamination in nearshore seawater
may be indicative of failing septic systems in the area. Fecal contamination was noted in
the station selected north of the swimming hole. While not violating any health based
standards, elevated levels of both E. coli and fecal coliform were also found in razor
clams. Eating food taken from or swimming in water contaminated with E. coli or fecal
material could cause serious illness.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 , Page: 82 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
The septic systems in affected areas should be evaluated further using a dye-tracing
method accompanied by concurrent fecal coliforms sampling (89). Those systems
suspected of failure should be repaired or replaced.
registered shellfish beds, a single sampling point is insufficient to determine the
quality of overlying water or shellfish. Further testing of the overlying seawaters
and shellfish is required to more fully evaluate the microbial safety of the shellfish.
Cranberry Bog Pesticides
Best Management Practices (BMPs):
• BMPs should be developed which limit and minimize the use of highly toxic, broad
spectrum pesticides such as guthion and chlorpyrifos.
• Agencies responsible for pesticide registration (USEPA,. Washington State
Department of Agriculture) should work closely with appropriate federal, state and
local water quality agencies (Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE),
EPA ORD, wetland researchers, etc.), and with growers and other appropriate
parties, in revising and improving the process of selecting pesticides to be used in
this complex aquatic ecosystem.
Revision 3.0, January]?, 1997 Page: 83 of 89
-------
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Chapter 8.0 REFERENCES
1. Brown, S., 1995. Shoalwaters mobilize efforts to reduce high infant mortality rates.
Washington Health Focus 10 (2): 5-6. Published by the Health Policy Analysis Program,
Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health and
Community Medicine. 1107 NE 45th St. Suite 400, JD-43. Seattle, WA 98105-4960.
2. Sugarman, J.R., and Van Eenwyk, J., 1993. Adverse reproductive outcomes on the
Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation, 1982-1992. Final Report to the Shoalwater Bay Tribal
Council. October 16.
3. Shoalwater Bay Tribal Council, et al., 1994. The pregnancy and infant mortality emergency of
the Shoalwater Bay Reservation, Washington State: A joint Report of findings issued by the
Shoalwater Bay Tribal Council, Indian Health Service, and Washington State Department of
Health. 62pp. October 27.
4. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 1994. Pollutants suspected in deaths. Article, December 2. p. B5.
5. Grays Harbor The Daily World, 1994. Shoalwaters want pollution study done. Article,
Decembers. Issue No. 128
6. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 1994. Agencies failing the Shoalwaters. Editorial, December 12.
7. Radford, R., 1996. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., Westport, WA. Personal
communication. July 29.
8. Jensen, G.C., 1995. Pacific coast crabs and shrimps. Sea Challengers. Monterey, CA. 87 pp.
9. USEPA Region 10, 1993. Final Report, Manchester Laboratory. Drinking Water
Analysis, Project WTR-102-A, Shoalwater Bay Community Water System. Sample ID#
105300019. EPA Region 10 Lab Management System, Office of Environmental Assessment,
1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle, WA 90101. June 21.
10. USEPA Region 10, 1993. Letter from C.L. Paulsen to Ken Hansen, Executive Director,
Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe. August 13.
11. USEPA Region 10, 1993. Letter from Kenneth D. Feigner to Herbert Mark Whitish,
Chairman, Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe. November 1.
12. USEPA, 1978. Microbiological methods for monitoring the environment, water and
wastewater. EPA-600/8-78-017. December.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 84 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
13. American Public Health Association (APHA), 1970. Recommended procedures for the
examination of sea water and shellfish. Fourth edition. ISBN 87553-059-1. 105pp. American
Public Health Association Inc., 1740 Broadway, New York, NY 10019. 105 pp.
147USEFA, 1990. Manual for the certification of laboratories analyzing drinking water-criteria
and procedures, quality assurance. 3rd. ed. EPA-570/9-90/008. 90 p.
15. APHA, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 1992.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th ed. ISBN 0-87553-207-1.
APHA, Washington, DC.
16. USEPA, 1991. Quality assurance and procedures manual. EPA Region 10 Laboratory. EPA
Region 10, 1200 6th Ave, Seattle, WA 90101.
17. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Shoalwater Environmental
Sampling Project, Willapa Bay, WA. Revision 1.0. Office of Environmental Assessment.
September 8.
18. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Shoalwater Drinking Water
Sampling Project, Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation, Washington. Revision 3. Office of
Environmental Assessment. September 22.
19. USEPA, 1991. National functional guidelines for organics data review (revised). June. EPA,
401 M St SW, Washington, DC 20460.
20. USEPA, 1988. Laboratory data validation functional guidelines for evaluating organics
analysis. February 1. EPA, 401 M St. SW, Washington, DC 20460.
21. USEPA, 1988. Laboratory data validation functional guidelines for evaluating inorganic
analyses. July 1. EPA, 401 M St. SW, Washington, DC 20460.
22. USEPA Region 10, 1993 to 1995. Manchester Laboratory standard operating procedures for
the evaluation of inorganics data. EPA Region 10 Laboratory, 7411 Beach Dr., East, Port
Orchard, WA 98366.
23. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Manchester Laboratory report of data validation of Tributyltin
(TBT) for the Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. October 21.
24. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Manchester Laboratory report of data validation of phenoxy-acid
herbicides for the Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. November 1.
25. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Report of data validation of pesticides and PCBs for the
Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. November 14.
26. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Report of data validation of BNAs (SVs) for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. October 28.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 85of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
27. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Report of data validation of VOAs for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. September 14.
28. USEPA Region 10, 1994. Report of data validation of metals for the Shoalwater Tribe
samplingj~project~Octoberr77 :
29. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of pesticides and PCBs for the
Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. May 8.
30. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of metals for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. April 10.
31. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of VOAs for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project March 20.
32. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of BNAs (SVs) for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. March 20.
33. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of anions, cations, and nutrients for the
Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. April 3.
34. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of BNAs (SVs) for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. April 15.
35. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of total metals and hexavalent chromium
for the Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. April 10.
36. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of methyl mercury for the Shoalwater
Tribe sampling project. May 19.
37. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of tributyl tin (TBT) for the Shoalwater
Tribe sampling project. May 19.
38. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of phenoxy-acid herbicides in sediment
samples for the Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. May 17.
39. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of explosives for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. June 8.
40. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of pesticides for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. November 7.
41. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of metals for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. September 11.
42. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of mercury for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. July 13.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 86 of 89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
43. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of metals for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. September 14.
44. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of total metals for the Shoalwater Tribe
sampling project. November 15~
45. USEPA Region 10, 1995. Report of data validation of general chemistry parameters for the
Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. November 28.
46. USEPA Region 10, 1996. Report of shellfish /ambient water microbiology for the Shoalwater
Tribe sampling project. March 26.
47. USEPA Region 10, 1996. Report of quality control procedures for microbiology
measurements for the Shoalwater Tribe sampling project. March 28.
48. State of Washington, 1995. Sediment Management Standards. WAC, Chapter 173 -204,
Amended December 29. Washington State Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 47703, Olympia,
WA 98504-7703.
49. USEPA Region 10, 1992. Human health risk-based "preliminary remediation goals" for water
and soil. Office of Environmental Assessment, USEPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave., OEA-095,
Seattle, WA 98101.
50. Bowen, H.J.M., 1979. Environmental chemistry of the elements, p.60. Academic Press,
London.
51. USEPA Region III., 1993. Risk -based concentration table. Dr. RoyL. Smith, Technical
Support Section (3HW13), USEPA Region III., 841 Chestnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19107.
52. USEPA, 1995. (40 CFRPart 131). Water Quality Standards; establishment of numeric
criteria for priority toxic pollutants; States' compliance-revision of metals criteria. Federal
Register 60: 86. 22229-22237. May 4.
53. USEPA, 1993. Drinking water regulations and health advisories. Office of Water, USEPA,
401 M St. SW, Washington, DC 20460.
54. Gribble, G. W., 1994. Natural organohalogens: Many more than you think! J. Chem. Ed.
71: 907-911.
55. Scheuer, P.J., 1973. Chemistry of Marine Natural Products. LC No. 72-88326. Academic
Press, New York and London.
56. USEPA, 1995. Section 304(a) criteria for priority toxic pollutants. 40 CFR: 131.36 (b)
57. USEPA, 1986. Quality Criteria for Water. EPA 440/5-86-001. May 1. EPA, Office of
Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC 20460.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 87of89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
58. EMCON, Inc., 1995. Level II survey report: former Nelson Stock Ranch site, Tokeland,
Washington. Project 41026-001.001. Prepared for Southern Puget Sound Inter-Tribal Housing
Authority. Emcon Inc., 603 Royal Street West, Kelso, WA 98626-0079. June 22.
TDD: 96-07-0012. Contract No: 68-W6-0008. Region 10 Superfund Technical Assessment &
Response Team. Prepared for Office of Environmental Cleanup, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, WA 98 101. September 24.
60. Ahrens, W.H., Ed., 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th Edition. Published by Weed Science
Society of America, 1508 West University Avenue, Champaign, IL 61821-3133. ISBN 0-
911733-18-3.
61.Meister, R.T., Ed., 1996. Farm Chemicals Handbook '96. Meister Publishing Co., 37733
Euclid Ave., Willoughby, OH 44094. '
62. State of Washington, 1992. Water quality standards for surface waters of the State of
Washington. WAC, Chapter 173 -201 A. 14pp. November 25.
63. Environment Canada, 1987. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines. Canadian Council of
Resource and Environment Ministers, Guidelines Division, Eco-Health Branch, Ecosystem
Sciences and Evaluation Directorate, Ottawa, ON, Canada Kl AOE7.
64. National Academy of Sciences, 1973. Water Quality Criteria. A Report of the Committee on
Water Quality Criteria to the Environmental Studies Board of the National Academy of Sciences
[and] National Academy of Engineering. National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington D.C.. 20418.
65. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1996. Washington State Pesticide Monitoring
Program: 1994 Surface Water Sampling Report. Publication No. 96-305. February. WDOE,
Environmental Investigations and Laboratory Services Program, Olympia, WA 98504-7710.
66. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1996. Pesticides and breakdown products
detected in Grays Harbor County drainage ditch No. 1 (Grayland Creek). (Preliminary
unpublished data). Washington State Pesticide Monitoring Program, WDOE, Environmental
Investigations and laboratory Services Program, Olympia, WA 98504-7710.
67. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1983 (amended 1995). Sediment management
standards. WDOE, Environmental Review and Sediment Section, P.O. Box 47600, Olympia,
WA 98504-7600.
68. Klaassen, C.D., Ed., 1995. Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The basic science of poisons.
p.711
69. Barton, Justine, 1996. Manager, Sediment Criteria, Office of Water, USEPA Region 10,
Seattle. Personal Communication.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 88 of 89
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
70. Muir, D.C.G., et al, 1991. Fate and acute toxicity of bromoxynil esters in an experimental
prairie wetland. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10(3): 395-406.
71. Smith, A.E., 1980. An analytical procedure for bromoxynil and its octanoate in soils:
persistence studieiswitlrbromoxynil octanoate in combination willTotlierKerbicides^irrsoir
Pesticide Sci. U(3): 341-346.
72. Brown, D.F., et al, 1985. Herbicide residues from winter wheat triticum-aestivum plots:
effect of tillage and crop management. J. Environ. Oual. 14(4): 521-532.
73. Kaufrnann, D.D., Ed., 1975. Herbicides: Chemistry, degradation, and mode of action. Vols.
1 and 2. 2nd. Ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. p. 584.
74. Vasconcelos, G.J., W. Jakubowski and T.H. Erickson, 1968. Bacteriological changes in
shellfish maintained in an estuarine environment. Proc. National Shellfish Association 59: (67)
(Abstract).
75. Gardner, G.R., 1993. Chemically induced histopathology in aquatic invertebrates. In:
Pathology of marine and estuarine organisms /edited by J.A. Couch and J.A. Fornie. ISBN 0-
8493-8662-4. CRC Press, Inc.
76. Harshbarger, J.C., et al., 1994. Softshell clam germinomas epidemiologically associated with
herbicides. Presented at American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
August 21-25.
77. Gardner, G.R., et al., 1991. Germinomas and teratoid siphon anomalies in softshell clams,
Mya arenaria. environmentally exposed to herbicides. Environmental Health Perspectives 90: pp.
43-51.
78. Hesselman, D.M, et al., 1988. Gonadal neoplasms in hardshelled clams, Mercenaria spp.,
from the Indian River, Florida: occurrence, prevalence, and histopathology. J. Invert. Pathol. 52:
pp. 436-446.
79. Riggan, W.B., et al., 1987. U.S. Cancer mortality rates and trends, 1950-1979, Vol. 4:
Maps. EPA/600/l-83/015e. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, health Effects Research
Laboratory, Research Triangle park, NC.
80. USEPA ORD, 1995. Letter from George Gardner to Michael Watson, lexicologist, USEPA
Region 10, Seattle, WA. USEPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research
Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI 02882. October 5.
81. Lum, W.E. II., 1984. A reconnaissance of the water resources of the Shoalwater Bay Indian
Reservation and adjacent areas, Pacific County, Washington, 1978-1979. U.S. Geological
Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report No. 83-4165. 34 p.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 89 of89
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
82. Ebbert, J.C. and K.L. Payne, 1984. The quality of water in the principal aquifers of
southwestern Washington. U.S. Geological Survey. Water Resources Investigations Report No.
84-4093. 59 p.
83. Piper, A.M.,T9447 A"graphic; procedurein the geb^cheniical interpretation of water analyses:
Trans. Am. Geophvs. Union 25: p. 914-923.
84. Callahan, M.A., et al., 1979. Water-related environmental fate of 129 priority pollutants.
Vol. 1. EPA-440/4-79-029A. p. 14. USEPA, Washington, DC 20460.
85. Jonasson, I.R., 1970. Mercury in the natural environment: A review of recent work.
Geological Survey of Canada, p. 13-14.
86. Sharom, M.S. et al, 1980. Behavior of 12 insecticides in soil and aqueous suspensions of soil
and sediment. Water Res. 14(8): 1095-1100.
87. Stanley, J.G., and J.G. Trial, 1980. Disappearance constants of carbaryl from streams
contaminated by forest spraying. Bull. Env. Contam. Toxicol. 25(5): 771-776.
88. Menzie, C.M., 1980. Metabolism of Pesticides-Update III. Special scientific report-Wildlife
No. 232. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
89. Vasey Engineering, Inc., 1996. Standard methods for on-site sewage system evaluation using
a dye tracer. Final Technical Report, Thurston County Environmental Health Division, Olympia
Washington.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997 Page: 90 of 89
-------
-------
The Shoal-water Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
APPENDICES
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Appendix A: SHOALWATER BAY HEALTH CONCERNS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
(Chair) James S. Marks. MD. MPH. Director, Reproductive Health Division, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Judith P. Rooks. CNM. MS. MPH. (Epidemiologist), Pacific Institute for Women's Health,
Portland, OR.
William L. Freeman. MD. MPH. Director of Research, Indian Health Service, Albuquerque, NM.
Katherine H. Chavienv. PhD. FACE. (Epidemiologist). Director, Office of Related Health
Professions, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL.
Juliet Van Eenwyk. PhD. State Epidemiologist, Washington State Department of Health,
Olympia, WA.
Roger Rosenblatt. MD. MPH. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA.
Richard W. Robinson. RS. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Region
10, Seattle, WA.
Michael Watson. PhD. DABT. Senior lexicologist, USEPA, Seattle, WA.
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
Appendix B: SHOALWATER BAY TRIBAL HEALTH BOARD
(Chair) Bob Boiorcas. P.O. Box 106, Tokeland, WA 98590.
(Vice-Chair') Ralph B. Lorton. 587 Park St., P.O. Box 387, Bay Center, WA 98527
fSecretary-Treasurer) Carol Svcks. P.O. Box 203, Lebam, WA 98554.
RonMullins. 1714 W. Anderson St., P.O. Box F-l, Elma, WA 98541.
Anna Mae Strong (also Tribal Elderl HCR61 Box 190, South Bend, WA 98586.
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Appendix C: COMPOUNDS WHICH WERE NOT DETECTED IN
SHOALWATER BAY SAMPLES
Table C-1. Inorganic Compounds Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-2. Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-3. Semi-Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-4. Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Table C-5. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Cranberry Bog Samples
Table C-6. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Tideflat Samples
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table C-1. Inorganic Compounds Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Station
Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
CAS
Number
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
3
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
95080023
Sediment
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
95080024
Water
5
Estuary, Upper
Beach Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
Metals Measurements
Selenium
Thallium
Antimony
Silver
7782492
7440280
7440360
7440224
mg/kg
0.8
0.5
40
U
U
UN
MQ/L
2
1
0.5
0.1
U
U
U
UN
mg/kg
0.8
0.5
4
U
U
UN
ugfl
2
1
0.5
0.1
U
U
U
UN
mg/kg
0.8
0.5
4
U
U
UN
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-1, Page: lofl.
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table C-2. Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples. (Page 1 of 4)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
1-Naphthol
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitrotoluene
2,4-D
2,4-DB
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrotoluene
5-Hydroxydicamba
Abate (Temephos)
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Aldicarb Sulfone
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Ametryn
Atraton
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
BDMC
Benefm
Bentazon
Benzene, 1-methy!-3-nitr
Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetrach
Benzene, Trinitro-
Benzene, 2-methyl-1 ,3,5-trinitro-
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromaci!
4-Hydroxy-3,5-dibromobenzonit
rile
Butachlor
Butylate
Butyltin trichloride
Carbarvl
CAS
Number
90153
99650
88722
94757
94826
121142
93765
93801
95954
88062
606202
51365
99990
7600502
3383968
15972608
116063
1646884
1646873
309002
319846
834128
1610179
19312249
2642719
86500
300050
1861401
25057890
99081
877098
99354
118967
1194656
319857
314409
1689845
23184669
2008415
1118463
63252
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
ug/kg
9.3
1736.0
520.8
128.0
155.0
520.8
102.0
116.0
74.0
75.0
520.8
125.0
520.8
128.0
886.0
354.0
29.0
29.0
98.0
295.0
98.0
157.0
157.0
148.0
192.0
520.8
2603:9
868.0
197.0
29.0
394.0
129.0
344.0
197.0
22.5
4.7
•
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
NAR
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
ug/L
0.5
2.0
2.0
0.2
0.2
2.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.0
0.2
2.0
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3
FW Stream,
Below
Dump Site
9508Q023
Sediment
ug&g
4.1
405.5
243.3
62.0
75.0
243.3
49.0
56.0
36.0
36.0
243.3
60.0
243.3
61.0
381.0
152.0
12.0
12.0
42.0
127.0
42.0
68.0
68.0
63.0
92.0
243.3
405.5
405.5
85.0
12.0
169.0
62.0
148.0
85.0
11.0
2.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
NAR
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump
Site
95080024
Water
ng/L
0.5
2.0
2.0
0.2
0.2
2.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.0
0.2
2.0
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
Estuary,
Upper Beac
Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
W&g|
6.3
480.8
288.5
136.0
164.0
288.5
108.0
123.0
79.0
80.0
288.5
133.0
288.5
135.0
575.0
230.0
19.0
64.0
192.0
64.0
102.0
102.0
96.0
203.0
288.5
480.8
480.8
128.0
19.0
255.0
136.0
224.0
128.0
23.8
3.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
NAR
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-2, Page: 1 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Carbophenothion
Carboxin
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
Cyanazine
Cycloate
Daconil
Dalapon
DCPA (dacthal)
DEF
Delta-BHC
Demeton-0
Demeton-s
Diallate
Diazinon
Dibutylchlorendate
Dibutyltin dichloride
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Dichlorvos
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dioxathion
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Diuron
Endosulfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Eptam
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenamiphos
Fenarimol
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexazinone
Imidan
4-Hvdroxv-3,5-diiodobenzonitrile
CAS
Number
786196
5234685
57749
101213
5598130
56724
21725462
1134232
1897456
75990
18611321
78488
319868
298033
126750
2303164
333415
1770805
683181
1918009
120365
62737
51338273
60571
60515
78342
957517
298044
330541
959988
33213659
72208
7421934
2104645
759944
55283686
563122
13194484
22224926
60168889
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
76448
1024573
51235042
732116
1689834
1
98.0
1083.0
381.0
394.0
79.0
118.0
148.0
197.0
236.0
87.0
99.0
138.0
29.0
138.0
138.0
374.0
79.0
22.5
127.0
140.0
79.0
203.0
57.0
79.0
167.0
295.0
59.0
591.0
29.0
57.0
57.0
57.0
98.0
197.0
148.0
69.0
79.0
148.0
295.0
69.0
157.0
69.0
591.0
59.0
29.0
29.0
148.0
108.0
133.0
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
NAR
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
2
0.1
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
3
42.0
465.0
499.0
169.0
34.0
51.0
63.0
85.0
102.0
42.0
48.0
59.0
12.0
59.0
59.0
161.0
34.0
11.0
61.0
68.0
34.0
98.0
25.0
34.0
72.0
127.0
25.0
254.0
12.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
42.0
85.0
63.0
30.0
34.0
63.0
127.0
30.0
68.0
30.0
254.0
25.0
12.0
12.0
63.0
47.0
64.0
U.
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
NAR
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
4
0.1
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
5 I
64.0
703.0
257.0
255.0
51.0
77.0
96.0
128.0
153.0
92.0
105.0
89.0
19.0
89.0
89.0
243.0
51.0
24.0
135.0
149.0
51.0
215.0
39.0
51.0
109.0
192.0
38.0
383.0
19.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
64.0
128.0
96.0
45.0
51.0
96.0
192.0
45.0
102.0
45.0
383.0
38.0
19.0
19.0
96.0
70.0
141.0
u II
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
u
UJ
NAR
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
u
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
UJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-2, Page: 2 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Station Number
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercury Methyl
Merphos
Metalaxyl
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Methyl Paraoxon
Metrlbuzln
Mevinphos
MGK-264
Molinate
Monocrotophos
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
Oxyfluprfen
Parathion
Parathion-methyl
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
Pebulate
Pendimethalin
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phorate
Phosphamidan
Picloram
Profluralin
Prometon
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propazine
Propetamphos
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
CAS
Numbe
58899
121755
94746
93652
115093
150505
57837191
51218452
16752775
72435
21087649
7786347
113484
2212671
6923224
15299997
98953
27314132
42874033
56382
298000
12674112
11104282
11141165
53469219
12672296
11097691
11096825
1114712
40487421
4901513
58902
298022
297994
1918021
26399360
1610180
7287196
23950585
139402
31218834
114261
1918167
299843
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
1
29.0
79.0
253.0
259.0
2.7
118.0
669.0
394.0
57.0
79.0
177.0
98.0
98.0
689.0
197.0
689.0
295.0
868.0
197.0
197.0
79.0
69.0
381.0
381.0
762.0
381.0
381.0
381.0
381.0
197.0
148.0
70.0
70.0
69.0
236.0
129.0
236.0
98.0
98.0
394.0
98.0
197.0
4.7
236.0
69.0
102.0
98.0
59.0
69.0
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
2
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
NAR
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
u
3
12.0
34.0
122.0
125.0
5.8
51.0
288.0
169.0
166.0
34.0
76.0
42.0
42.0
296.0
85.0
296.0
127.0
405.5
85.0
85.0
34.0
30.0
166.0
333.0
166.0
166.0
166.0
166.0
166.0
85.0
63.0
34.0
34.0
30.0
102.0
62.0
102.0
42.0
42.0
169.0
42.0
85.0
2.1
102.0
30.0
49.0
42.0
25.0
30.0
U
U
U
u
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
4
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
1.0
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.0
" 0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
U
U
U
U
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
NAR
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
5
19.0
51.0
268.0
275.0
2.1
77.0
434.0
255.0
39.0
51.0
115.0
64.0
64.0
447.0
128.0
447.0
192.0
480.8
128.0
128.0
51.0
45.0
257.0
257.0
515,0
257.0
257.0
257.0
257.0
128.0
96.0
74.0
74.0
45.0
153.0
137.0
153.0
64.0
64.0
255.0
64.0
128.0
3.1
153.0
45.0
108.0
64.0
38.0
45.0
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u II
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-2, Page: 3 of 4
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Terbutryn (Igran)
Tetrabutyltin
Tetrachlorvinphos
Tetryl
Triademefon
Tributyltin chloride
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Vernolate
Vydate
CAS
Number
34014181
5902512
886500
1461252
961115
479458
43121433
1461229
55335063
1582098
1929777
23135220
1
148.0
295.0
98.0
23.7
197.0
868.0
256.0
20.5
102.0
148.0
197.0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
2.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
U
U
U
U.
U
U
U
U
U
U
3
63.0
127.0
42.0
11.4
85.0
405.5
110.0
10.6
49.0
63.0
85.0
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
4
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
2.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
96.0
192.0
64.0
25.0
128.0
480.8
166.0
25.7
109.0
96.0
128.0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-2, Page: 4 of 4
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table C-3. Semi-Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dum
Station Number
Location
EPA Sampfe
Number
Media
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylphenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
3-Nitroaniline
3B-Coprostanol
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
9H-Carbazole
Acenaphthylene
Aniline
Benzidine
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzoic acid
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
CAS
Number
95501
122667
120821
541731
106467
91587
95578
95487
88744
88755
120832
105679
51285
121142
95954
88062
606202
91941
99092
360689
101553
59507
106478
7005723
100016
100027
534521
86748
208968
62533
92875
205992
56553
50328
191242
65850
207089
100516
1
Dump Site
95080025
Sediment
wg/kg
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
762
762
152
152
6090
1520
152
305
762
305
762
152
152
152
152
762
1520
3050
152
152
152
305
152
152
152
152
3050
152
152
-
U
u
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
R
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
M
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.57
0.28
0.28
5.7
2.8
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.57
1.4
2.8
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.57
2.8
5.7
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.57
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
5.7
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
3
FW Stream
Below
Dump Site
95080023
Sediment
jjg/kg
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
333
333
66.6
66.6
2660
666
66.6
133
333
133
333
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
333
666
1330
66.6
66.6
66.6
133
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
1330
66.6
66.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
p Site Samples
4
FW Stream,
Below
Dump Site
95080024
Water
M0/I
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.57
0.28
0.28
5.7
2.8
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.57
1.4
2.8
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.57
2.8
5.7
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.57
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
5.7
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
5
Estuary,
Upper Beac
Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
M0/kg
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
515
515
103
103
4120
1030
103
206
515
206
515
103
103
103
103
515
1030
2060
103
103
103
206
103
103
103
103
2060
103
103
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
u
u
u
u
u
R
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-3, Page: Iof2
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Butylbenzylphthalate
Caffeine
Chrysene
Di-n-octylphthalate
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dimethylphthalate
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyridine
CAS
Number
111911
111444
39638329
117817
85687
58082
218019
117840
53703
131113
118741
87683
77474
67721
193395
78591
86306
62759
621647
9.1576
91203
98953
87865
85018
108952
110861
1
152
152
152
880
762
152
152
762
152
152
152
152
3050
152
152
152
152
762
152
152
152
152
1520
152
152
305
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.28
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3
66.6
66.6
66.6
1330
333
66.6
66.6
333
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
1330
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
333
66.6
66.6
66.6
66.6
666
66.6
66.6
133
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.28
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
103
103
103
515
515
103
103
515
103
103
103
103
2060
103
103
103
103
515
103
103
103
103
1030
103
232
206
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-3, Page: 2 of 2
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table C-4. Volatiles Which Were Not Detected in Dump Site Samples
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Butanone
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
2,2-Dichloropropane
4-Chlorotoluene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloromethane
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
CAS
Number
75343
75354
563586
71556
630206
79005
96128
106934
95501
107062
78875
87616
96184
120821
95636
541731
142289
108678
106467
78933
95498
591786
594207
106434
108101
67641
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
75150
56235
108907
75003
74873
156592
10061015
1
Dump!
Site
95080025
Sediment
M0/Rg
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
23.1
3.2
15.9
3.2
3.2
3.2
39.6
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
6.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
7
3.2
3.4
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
U04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3
FW Stream
Below
Dump Site
95080023
Sediment
yg/kg
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
19.3
2
10.2
2
2
2
27.6
2
2
2
2
4.1
2
2
2
2
5.2
2
2.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump
Site
95080024
Water
ug/l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
Estuary,
Upper Beach
Lagoon
95080021
Sediment
ug/fcg
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
122
5.3
26.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
135
5:3
5.3
5.3
5.3
10.6
6.9
5.3
5.3
5.3
15.2
5.3
5.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-4, Page: Iof2
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethane, 1,1, 2,2-tetrachl
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
MP-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
p-lsopropyltoluene
sec-Butyl benzene
Styrene
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl Chloride
CAS
Number
124481
74953
75718
79345
100414
87683
98828
75092
103651
104518
91203
95476
99876
135988
100425
98066
127184
108883
1330207
156605
10061026
79016
75694
75014
1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
15.9
6.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
6.4
3.2
3
3.2
3.2
3.2
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
1
A
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0.94
1
1
1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10.2
4.1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4.1
2
1.9
2
2
2
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0.94
1
1
1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
5.3
5,3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
26.4
10.6
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
10.6
5.3
5
5.3
5.3
5.3
U
JJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-4, Page: 2 of 2
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table C-5. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Cranberry Bog Samples.
Station Number
Location
Media
EPA Sample
Numbers
CAS
Number
6
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240100
95240101
• 7
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
Water
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
8
Lower Cranberry
Ditch
Sediment
95240106
95240107
9
Lower Cranberry
Ditch
Water
95240111
95240110
95240109
95240108
Metals Measurements
.
Antimony
Cadmium
Mercury
Thallium
Tin
-
7440360
7440439
7439976
7440280
7440315
ms/kg
8
0.08
0.02
12
5
-
U
U
U
U
U
PQ/I
0.5
0.3
0.1
1
U
U
U
U
mg/kg
8
0.08
0.03
12
2.5
,
U
U
U
U
U
Wl
0.5
0.3
0.1
1
v
U
U
U
U
Pesticide Measurements
Units
2,4-DB
2,4'-DDE
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Abate (Temephos)
Acifluorfen
Acifluorfen (Blazer)
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Alpha-Chlordene
Ametryn
Atraton
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Benefm
Bentazon
Benzoic acid, 3-amino-2,
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Butachlor
94826
324826
93765
93801
95954
88062
51365
100027
7600502
3383968
50594666
62476599
15972608
309002
319846
56534022
834128
1610179
1912249
2642719
1861401
25057890
133904
319857
314409
1689845
23184669
M9*9
62
14
41
46
31
31
51
89 .
51
200
82
14
14
23
68
23
36
34
51
51
14
. 91
51
80
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
M9/l
0.16
0.048
0.1
0.12
0.08
0.079
0.13
0
0.72
0.53
0.29
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.08
0.048
0.08
0.13
0.12
0.2
0.13
0.048
0.32
0.13
0.63
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
pg/kg
51
10
34
38
25
25
42
230
42
160
170
62
10
10
17
52
17
28
26
63
42
10
70
42
61
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
pg/l
0.12
0.048
0.083
0.094
0.06
0.062
0.1
0.18
0
0.73
0.42
0.29
0.048
0.048
0.081
0.24
0.081
0.13
0.12
0.16
0.1
0.048
0.32
0.1
0.54
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
R
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-5, Page: Iof4
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Station Number
Butylate
Captafol
Captan
Carbophenothion
Carboxin
Chlordane (Tech) .
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
cis-Chlordane
(alpha-Chlordane)
cis-Permethrin
Coumaphos
Cyanazine
Cycloate
Daconil
Dalapon
DCPA
DDM4
DBF
Delta-BHC
Demeton-0
Demeton-s
Diallate-l
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Dichlorvos
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Dioxathion
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Diuron
Endosulfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
EPN
Eptam
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenamiphos
Fenarimol
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fenvalerate (total)
CAS
Number
2008415
2425061
133062
786196
5234685
57749
5598130
5103719
52645531
56724
21725462
1134232
1897456
75990
1861321
1022226
78488
319868
298033
126750
2302164
1918009
120365
62737
51338273
60571
60515
88857
78342
957517
298044
330541
959988
33213659
1031078
72208
7421934
53494705
2104645
759944
55283686
563122
13194484
22224926
60168889
122145
115902
55389
51630581
6
45
16
41
23
250
91
16
120
27
34
45
54
1000
41
23
32
14
16
16
86
51
56
18
77
14
18
100
39
68
14
140
14
14
14
14
14
14
23
45
34
16
18
34
68
16
23
16
460
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U .
U
UJ
U
UJ
7
0.16
0.24
0.14
0.08
0.88
0.32
0.056
0.048
0.16
0.096
0.12
0.16
0.19
0
0.1
0.048
0.11
0.048
0.056
0.056
0.3
0.13
0.14
0.064
0.2
0.048
0.064
0.2
0.14
0.24
0.28
0.48
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.08
0.16
0.07
0.056
0.064
0.12
0.24
0.056
0.08
0.034
0.32
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
R
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
8
35
52
31
17
190
70
12
35
21
26
35
42
850
34
10
24
10
12
12
66
34
46
14
63
10
14
150
30
52
10
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
17
35
26
12
14
26
52
12
17
12
35
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
9
0.16
0.24
0.14
0.081
0.89
0.32
0.057
0.16
0.097
0.12
0.16
0.19
0
0.083
0.048
0.11
0.048
0.057
0.057
0.31
0.1
0.11
0.065
0.16
0.048
0.065
0.16
0.14
0.24
0.33
0.48
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.081
0.16
0.076
0.057
0.065
0.12
0.24
0.057
0.081
0.038
0.32
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
R
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-5, Page: 2 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Station Number
Fluridone
Fonophos
Gamma-Chlordane
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexazinone
Imidan
loxynil
Kelthane
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Merphos
Metalaxyl
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Mevinphos
MGK-264
Mirex
Molinate
Oxychlordane
Oxyfluorfen
o,o-Diethyl Phosphoric
Acid, o-p-Nitroph
o.p'-DDT
Parathion
Parathion-methyl
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
3ebulate
Dendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenothrin
Phorate
Phosphamldan
Picloram
Profluralin
Prometon
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propargite
Prooazine
CAS
Number
59756604
944229
5103742
76448
1024573
51235042
732116
1689834
115322
58899
121755
94746
93652
150505
57837191
51218452
72435
21087649
7786347
113484
2385855
2212671
27304138
42874033
311455
789026
56382
298000
11104282
11141165
53469219
12672296
11097691
11096825
1114712
40487421
87865
4901513
58902
26002802
298022
297994
1918021
26399360
1610180
7287196
23950585
2312358
139402
6
140
14
14
14
14
34
25
51
54
14
18
100
100
36
150
91
1'4
23
23
160
14
45
91
41
88
18
16
91
91
91
91
91
91
45
34
20
28
28
200
16
54
51
54
23
23
91
45
23
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
7
0.48
0:048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.12
0.088
0.13
0.19
0.048
0.064
0.26
0.26
0.13
0.54
0.32
0.048
0.08
0.08
0.56
0.048
0.16
0.048
0.32
6.1
0.01
0.031
0.056
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.16
0.12
0.009
0.072
0.072
0.16
0.056
0.19
0
0.19
0.08
0.08
0.32
0.16
0.08
UJ
— u —
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
UJ
R
u
u
u
u
u
u
8
100
10
10
10
10
26
19
42
42
10
14
85
85
28
120
70
10
17
17
120
10
35
70
31
1.8
14
12
70
70
70
70
70
70
35
26
20
23
23
0.47
12
42
42
42
17
17
70
35
17
UJ
— U —
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
. u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
u
u
UJ
u
u
UJ
UJ
u
u
9
0.48
0,048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.12
0.089
0.1
0.19
0.048
0.065
0.21
0.21
0.13
0.55
0.32
0.048
0.081
0.081
0.57
0.048
0.16
0.32
7.4
0.0086
0.035
0.057
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.16
0.12
0.0079
0.057
0.06
2
0.057
0.19
0
0.19
0.081
0.081
0.32
0.16
0.081
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
UJ
R
u
u
UJ
u
u
u
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix C, Table C-5, Page: 3 of 4
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Propetamphos
Ramrod
Resmethrin
Ronnel
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Terbutryn (Igran)
Tetrachlorvinphos
Toxaphene
trans-Nonachlor
Triademefon
Triallate
Trifluraline
Vernolate
CAS
Number
31218834
A 91 81 67
10453868
299843
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
886500
961115
8001352
39765805
43121433
2303175
1582098
1929777
6
45
54
15
16
41
23
14
16
34
68
23
45
450
59
59
34
45
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7
0.16
0.19
0.16
0.056
0.1
0.022
0.048
0.056
0.12
0.24
0.08
0.16
1.6
0.048
0.21
0.21
0.12
0.16
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
8
35
42
0.17
12
34
17
10
12
26
52
17
35
350
45
45
26
35
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
9
0.16
0.19
2
0.057
0.083
0.081
0.048
0.057
0.12
0.24
0.081
0.16
1.6
0.21
0.21
0.12
0.16
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-5, Page: 4 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Table C-6. Metals and Pesticides Which Were Not Detected in Tideflat Samples (Page 1 of 6)
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
CAS
Number
10
Willapa Bay,
Oyster Bed
94344301
Sediment
11
Willapa Bay, Oyster
Bed
94344302
Sediment
12
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1994
94344303
Sediment
12A
SBIR, Swimming
Hole, 1995
95080022
Sediment
13
Hawks Point
Shellfish Area
9434304
Sediment
14
Willapa Bay
Ellen Sands
94343C
iO
Sediment
Metals Measurements:
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Tin
7440439
7782492
7440280
7440315
mg/kg
0.2
0.2
0.5
2.5
U
U
U
U
mg/kg
0.2
0.2
0.5
2.5
U
U
U
U
mg/kg
0.2
0.2
0.5
2.5
U
U
U
U
mg/kS
0.2
0.8
0.5
U
U
U
iflg/kg
0.2
0.2
0.5
2.5
U
U
U
U
rtig/kg
0.2
0.2
0.5
2.5
Pesticides Measurements:
1-Naphthol
1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2-Nitrotoluene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
2,4-D
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-T
3-OH-Carbofuran
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
90153
99650
96128
106934
88722
88062
606202
121142
95954
94826
94757
93801
93765
16655826
51365
100027
ug&g
5.532
2.9
2.9
39
39
81
67
61
53
2.766
65
115
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ug&g
4.905
2.3
2.3
36
35
74
61
55
49
2.453
60
104
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
tig/kg
6.626
3.1
3.1
45
44
92
76
69
61
3.313
74
130
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ag/kg
4.064
433.3
260
43
260
260
42
88
73
66
58
2.032
71
121
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4J49
2.3
2.3
36
35
73
61
55
48
2.375
59
104
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4.882
2.3
2.3
33
32
67
56
51
44
2.441
55
96
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
95080020
Sediment
U
U
U
U
rag/kg
0.2
0.8
0.5
U
U
U
U
U
.U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ug/kg
6.868
469.7
281.8
82
281.8
281.8
81
168
139
126
111
3.434
136
230
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix
ixC, Table C-6,
Page: 1 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
4-Nitrotoluene
5-Hydroxydicamba
Abate (Temephos)
Alachlor
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Ametryn
Atraton
Atrazine
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Benefin
Bentazon
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-nitr
Benzene .Trinitro-.
Benzene, 2-methyl-1 ,3,5-trinitro-
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Butachlor
Butylate
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbophenothion
Carboxin
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
CAS
Number
99990
7600502
3383968
15972608
1646873
116063
309002
319846
834128
1610179
19312249
1912249
86500
2642719
1861401
25057890
99081
99354
118967
1194656
319857
314409
23184669
2008415
63252
1563662
786196
5234685
57749
101213
5598130
56724
10
67
293
78
2.766
2.766
9.75
9.75
32.5
97.5
32.5
52
52
48.8
100
39
9.75
195
113.8
48.8 .
2.766
2.766
32.5
358
130
163
22.8
39
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
61
220
58.8
2.453
2.453
7.35
7.35
24.5
73.5
24.5
39.2
39.2
36.7
91
29.4
7.35
147
85.7
36.7
4.453
2.453
24.5
269
98
122
17.1
29.4
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12
76
358
95.5
3.313
3.313
11.9
11.9
39.8
119
39.8
63.6
63.6
59.7
114
47.7
11.9
239
139
59.7
3.313
3.313
39.8
438
159
199
27.8
47.7
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12A
260
73
397
159
13
13
44
132
44
71
71
66
109
260
433.3
433.3
88
13
177
155
88
2.032
2.032
44
486
171
177
35
53
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
13
60
250
66.6
2.375
2.375
8.3
8.3
27.8
83
27.8
44.4
44.4
41.6
91
33.3
8.3
167
97
41.6
2.375
2.375
27.8
305
111
139
19.4
33.3
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
55
249
66.5
2.441
2.441
8.31
8.31
27.7
83.1
27.7
44.3
44.3
41.6
83
33.3
8.31
166
97
41.6
2.441
2.441
27.7
305
111
139
19.4
33.3
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
.
U
U
U
U
U
u
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
23
281.8
138
663
265
23
23
74
221
74
118
118
111
208
281.8
469.7
469.7
147
23
295
258
147
3.434
3.434
74
811
313
295
59
88
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
UJ
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix C, TabkC-6, Page: 2 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Cyanazine
Cycloate
Daconil
DCPA (dacthal)
DCPA
DEF
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Dialiate
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Dichlorvos
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dioxathion
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Diuron
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan 1
Endrin
Endrin Ketone
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Eptam
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
CAS
Number
21725462
1134232
1897456
18611321
1861321
78488
319868
126750
298033
2303164
333415
1918009
120365
62737
51338273
60571
60515
78342
957517
298044
330541
1031078
33213659
959988
72208
53494705
7421934
2104645
759944
55283686
563122
13194484
10
48.8
48.8
78
52
45.5
9.75
22.8
22.8
124
26
66
73
26
106
19.5
26
55.3
97.5
19.5
195
19.5
19.5
9.75
19.5
19.5
19.5
32.5
48.8
48.8
22.8
26
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
36.7
36.7
58.8
47
34.3
7.35
17.1
17.1
93
19.6
60
67
19.6
96
14.7
19.6
41.6
73.5
14.7
147
14.7
7.35
14.7
14.7
14.7
24.5
36.7
36.7
17.1
19.6
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12
59.7
59.7
95.5
59
55.7
27.8
27.8
151
31.8
75
83
31.8
120
23.9
31.8
67.6
119
23.9
239
23.9
23.9
11.9
23.9
23.9
23.9
39.8
59.7
59.7
27.8
31.8
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12A
66
88
106
56
62
13
62
62
168
35
72
80
35
115
26
35
75
132
26
265
26
26
13
26
26
26
44
88
66
31
35
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
13
41.6
41.6
66.6
47
38.9
8.3
19.4
19.4
106
22.2
60
67
22.2
96
16.7
22.2
47.2
83
16.7
167
16.7
16.7
8.3
16.7
16.7
16.7
27.8
41.6
41.6
19.4
22.2
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
41.6
41.6
66.5
43
38.8
8.31
19.4
19.4
105
22.2
55
61
22.2
88
16.6
22.2
47.1
83.1
16.6
166
16.6
16.6
8.31
16.6
16.6
16.6
27.7
41.6
41.6
19.4
22.2
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
23
111
147
177
108
103
23
103
103
280
59
138
152
59
220
47
59
125
221
44
442
47
47
23
47
47
47
74
147
111
52
59
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Tabl C-6, Page: 3 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Station Number
Fenamiphos
Fenarimol
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexazinone
Imidan
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Mercury Methyl
Merphos
Metalaxyl
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methyl Paraoxon
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Metribuzin
Mevinphos
MGK-264
Molinate
Monocrotophos
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
CAS
Number
22224926
60168889
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
51235042
732116
58899
121755
94746
93652
2032657
115093
150505
57837191
51218452
16752775
72435
21087649
7786347
113484
2212671
6923224
15299997
98953
27314132
10
48.8
97.5
22.8
32.5
22.8
260
19.5
9.75
9.75
48.8
35.8
9.75
26
132
135
5.532
150
52
221
97.5
2.766
19.5
32.5
32.5
228
84.5
97.5
48.8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
36.7
73.5
17.1
24.5
17.1
196
14.7
7.35
7.35
36.7
26.9
7.35
19.6
120
123
4.905
130
392
167
73.5
2.453
14.7
24.5
24.5
171
63.7
73.5
36.7
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12
59.7
119
27.8
39.8
27.8
318
23.9
11.9
11.9
59.7
43.8
11.9
31.8
150
154
6.626
170
63.6
271
119
3.313
23.9
39.8
39.8
278
103
119
59.7
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12A
66
132
31
71
31
265
26
13
13
66
49
13
35
144
147
4.064
5.76
53
300
177
26
79
35
44
44
309
88
309
132
433.3
88
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
13
41.6
83
19.4
27.8
19.4
222
16.7
8.3
8.3
41.6
30.5
8.3
22.2
120
123
4.749
110
44.4
189
83
2.375
16.7
27.8
27.8
194
72
83
41.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
41.6
83.1
19.4
27.7
19.4
222
16.6
8.31
8.31
41.6
30.5
8.31
22.2
110
113
488.2
110
44.3
188
83.1
2.441
16.6
27.7
27.7
194
72.1
83.1
41.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
23
111
221
52
118
52
442
44
23
23
111
81
23
59
274
281
6.868
6.56
88
501
295
47
133
59
74
74
516
147
516
221
469.7
147
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix C, Table C-6, Page: 4 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
o,o-Diethyl Phosphoric Acid,
o-p-Nitroph
Oxyfluorfen
p,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDD
p.p'-DDE
Parathion
Parathion-methyl
PCB-1254
PCB-1248
PCB-1016
PCB-1260
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1221
Pebulate
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Phosphamidan
Picloram
Profluralin
Prometon
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propazine
Propetamphos
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
Silvex
CAS
Number
311455
42874033
50293
72548
72559
56382
298000
11097691
12672296
12674112
11096825
11141165
53469219
11104282
1114712
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
297994
1918021
26399360
1610180
7287196
23950585
139402
31218834
114261
1918167
299843
93721
10
58.5
84.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
26
22.8
130
130
130
130
260
130
130
78
48.8
33
37
37
22.8
78
67
78
32.5
32.5
97.5
32.5
65
2.766
65
22.8
53
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
44.1
63.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
19.6
17.1
98
98
98
98
196
98
98
58.8
36.7
31
33
33
17.1
58.8
61
58.8
24.5
24.5
73.5
24.5
49
2.453
49
17.1
48
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12
71.6
103
23.9
23.9
23.9
31.8
27.8
159
159
159
159
318
159
159
95.5
59.7
38
42
42
27.8
95.5
77
95.5
39.8
39.8
119
39.8
79.6
3.313
79.6
27.8
60
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
12A
88
26
26
26
35
31
171
171
171
171
341
171
171
88
66
37
40
40
31
106
73
106
44
44
177
44
88
2.032
106
31
58
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
13
50
72
16.7
16.7
16.7
22.2
19.4
111
111
111
111
222
111
111
66.6
41.6
30
33
33
19.4
66.6
61
66.6
27.8
27.8
83
27.8
55.5
2.375
55.5
19.4
48
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
49.9
72.1
16.6
16.6
16.6
222
19.4
111
111
111
111
222
111
111
66.5
41.6
28
30
30
19.4
66.5
56
66.5
27.7
27.7
83.1
27.7
55.4
2.441
55.4
19.4
44
Revision 3.0, January 1 7, 1997 Appendix C, Tablt
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
23
147
47
47
47
59
52
313
313
313
313
626
313
313
147
111
70
76
76
52
177
140
177
74
74
295
74
147
3.434
177
52
110
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
*.C-6, Page: 5 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Terbutryn (Igran)
Tetrabutyltin
Tetrachlorvinphos
Tetryl
Toxaphene
Triademefon
Triallate
Trichtopyr
Trifluraline
Vernolate
Vydate
CAS
Number
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
886500
1461252
961115
479458
8001352
43121433
2303175
55335063
1582098
1929777
23135220
10
32.5
19.5
22.8
32.5
163
32.5
4.5
65
390
84.5
84.5
53
48.8
48.8
2.766
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
11
24.5
14.7
17.1
24.5
122
24.5
3.7
49
294
63.7
63.7
49
36.7
36.7
2.453
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
12
39.8
23.9
27.8
39.8
199
39.8
5.6
79.6
477
103
103
61
59.7
59.7
3.313
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
12A
44
26
31
66
132
44
11.3
88
433.3
512
115
58
66
88
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
13
27.8
16.7
19.4
27.8
139
27.8
4.4
55.5
333
72
72
49
41.6
41.6
2.375
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
14
27.7
16.6
19.4
27.7
139
27.7
4.8
55.4
333
72.1
72.1
45
41.6
41.6
2.441
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
23
74
44
52
111
221
74
7.9
147
469.7
939
192
111
111
147
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix C, Table C~6, Page: 6 of 6
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Appendix D: METHOD BLANKS WHICH HAD TARGET COMPOUNDS
ABOVE THE QUANTITATION LIMITS
Table D-l. Metals Measurements of Method Blank Samples
Table D-2. Pesticide Measurements of Method Blank. Samples
Table D-3. Semi-Volatile Organics Measurements of Method Blank Samples
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table D-1. Metals Measurements in Method Blank Samples1
TIDEFLATS SAMPLES
Target
Compound
Aluminum
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Sodium
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CAS#
7429905
7440702
7440473
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7440235
Blank #
Blank #
ES940830
3.3
2.97
0.98
0.38
6.59
0.16
2
0.49
13.1
P
P
P
P
P
P
Blank #
Blank #
Blank #
PUMPSAMPLES
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Calcium
Iron
Lead
Sodium
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
ug/l
ug/l
mg/kg
ug/l
7429905
7440360
7440393
7440702
7439896
7439921
7440235
S95Q316A
2
5
0.2
1.38
3.37
0.1
2
U
PN
U
U
U
W95Q3q$A
5
10
76
U
U
P
W9SD3QS
4.2
0.56
2.7
1.56
P
P
P
CRANBERRY BOG SAMPLES
Aluminum
Barium
Calcium
Iron
Sodium
Zinc
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
7429905
7440393
7440702
7439896
7440235
7440666
KW95Q8Q1
20
2
36.1
10
27
4.8
U
U
U
P
P
ES950721
0.87
0.38
1.5
0.68
12.7
1.77
P
P
'These Method Blank Samples Had Target Compounds Above Method Quantitation Limits.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix D, Table D-1, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table D-2. Pesticide Measurements in Method Blank Samples1
• ' ' - . - . .... .... . y
TIDEFLATS SAMPLES
Target Compound
Dichlorobenzoic Acid
Dinoseb
Units
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
CAS#
88857
Blank #
BS4243H
46
71
R
R
Blank #
Blank #
Blank #
Blank #
DUMP SAMPLES
4-Nitrophenol
Acifluorfen
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Butyltin trichloride
Dibutyltin dichloride
Dinoseb
Tetrabutyltin
Tributyltin chloride
ug/l
M9/I
Mg/l
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
ug/l
Mg/kg
M9/kg
100027
50594666
133904
1118463
683181.
88857
1461252
1461229
BW5059D
0.393
0.967
0.234
0.354
R
R
R
R
BS5061
258
62
95
R
R
R
BS5061D
258
62
95
R
R
R
SQ5066
12.6
8.5
125
J
J
J
SQ5D660
11.4
16.6
126
J
J
J
1These Method Blank Samples Had Target Compounds Above Method Quantitation Limits.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix D, Table D-2, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 -1995
Table D-3. Semi-volitile Organics Measurements in Method Blank Samples1
••
DUMP $AMPLES
Target Compound
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
17-Octadecenal
2-Butanone
2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methy
3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl
4-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl
9H-Fluorene
Acetic acid, 1-methyleth
Acetone
Benzene
Benzole acid
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbon Disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Glycocyanidine
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hydrocarbon Unknown 02
Hydrocarbon Unknown 01
Isopropylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
mp-Xylene
n-Butylbenzene
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Octadecanoic acid
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Units
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
US/kg
ua/kg
Ma/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
MQ/kq
CAS#
108678
106467
95636
87616
120821
541731
95501
56554860
78933
123422
872504
141797
3744023
86737
108214
67641
71432
65850
100516
117817
85687
75150
108907
67663
74873
84742
84662
503866
87683
98828
75092
104518
91203
95476
57114
87865
85018
Blank #
BS4243
30.3
30.3
30.3
30.3
31.9
74600
8
2790
1.2
60.4
12.5
142
4
41.9
6.2
106
30.3
106
39.6
30.3
49.4
3.5
3.2
U
U
U
U
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
J
J
J
J
J
NJ
U
J
NJ
U
NJ
J
J
Blank #
B64243D
30.3
30.3
30.3
30.3
122000
399
14
3540
30.3
455
143
30.3
73.2
30.3
30.3
6.7
30.3
849
30.3
59.1
6.5
30.3
U
U
U
U
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
U
NJ
J
U
U
U
J
U
J
U
NJ
J
U
Blank #
VBS4242
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.21
0.14
0.04
0.07
1
4.8
0.18
0.98
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.04
0.37
0.05
0.08
0.44
0.02
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix D, Table D-3, Page: Iof2
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
DUMP SAMPLES
Phenol
Phthalate unknown 15
Phthalate unknown 16
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Trichloroethene
Unknown 09
Unknown 10
Unknown 14
Unknown 08
Unknown 07
Unknown 06
Unknown 12
Unknown 05
Unknown 04
Unknown 1 1
Unknown 03
Unknown 1 3
Unknown 01
Unknown 02
M9/kg
M9/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
M9/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
108952
108883
1330207
79016
13.1
30
382
19.2
140
643
474
574
242
2130
78.6
799
174
35
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
17.7
2170
682
2050
176
563
187
124
40.7
1410
208
184
44.3
116
203
232
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
0.06
0.07
0.05
J
J
J
-
'These Method Blank Samples Had Target Compounds Above Method Quantitation Limits.
Revision 3.0, January 1.7, 1997
Appendix D, Table D-3, Page: 2 of 2
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
APPENDIX E: QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR FIELD AND LABORATORY
DUPLICATE SAMPLES AND FOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
(MS/MSD) SAMPLES
Table E-l. QC Data for Metals Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Table E-2. QC Data for General Chemistry Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
Table E-3. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Tideflat Samples #10, 11, and 12A
Table E-4. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #13 and 14
Table E-5. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #2 and 23
Table E-6. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #4 and 5
Table E-7. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #5 and 8
Table E-8. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #7
Table E-9. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #2 and 14
Table E-10. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #4 and 23
Table E-l 1. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #6 and 7
Table E-12. MS/MSD Metals Measurements of Samples #8 and 9
Table E-l3. MS/MSD General Chemistry Measurements of Samples #2 and 4
Table E-14. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #10 and 11
Table E-15. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #12A and 13
Table E-16. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #14 and 2
Table E-l7. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #23
Table E-l8. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #4 and 5
Table E-l9. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #7
Table E-20. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples #8
Table E-21. Blind Duplicate Inorganic Measurements of Drinking Water Samples
-------
The Shoalwater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-22. Laboratory Duplicate Inorganics Measurements of Dump Site Samples
l^
Table E-24. Laboratory Duplicate Metals Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-1. QC Data for Metals Measurements in Drinking Water Samples
Station
^InmhAr
Sample
Location
EPA Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silica
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
35
outdoor
tap
954305
16
fcS/l
20
0.5
5.3
2
0.5
16
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5590
1.1
0.2
5
10
1900
2
25200
3
9800
1
8.3
7.7
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
35
field ri
outdoor
tap
95430
517
U3rt
20
0.5
5.28
2
0.5
17
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5560
1
0.2
5
10
2000
2
25100
3
9740
1
8
9.6
jp
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
P
39
kitchen
tap
95430
505
ugf
20
0.5
4.2
2
0.5
21
2
23900
5
10
1
186
0.5
4740
138
0.2
5
10
3130
2
36100
3
11600
1
3
4.2
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
39
lab dup.
95430
505
US/1
20
0.5
4.2
2
0.5
20
2
23800
5
10
1
187
0.5
4740
138
5
10
2880
2
36100
3
11600
1
3
4.3
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
39
matrix
spike
95430
505
%reo
107
104
107
101
104
100
104
109
104
103
99
103
101
122
102
103
102
101
121
NA
93
NA
100
104
104
39
matsp
diip
95430
505
%ree
105
107
107
100
103
99
103
NA
103
102
98
102
101
NA
101
102
101
103
124
NA
92
NA
101
102
103
44
kitchen
tap
95430
514
ttgfl
30
0.5
1
2
0.5
17
2
7720
5
10
46
25.8
0.55
2410
1
0.2
5
10
820
2
19500
3
7360
1
3
4
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
45
bathroo
mtap
95430
515
ugfl
20
0.5
1.1
11.6
0.5
46
2
38100
5
10
1
1160
0.5
14700
165
0.2
5
10
8440
2
49100
3
9810
1
3
4.1
U
U
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
45
matrix
spike
95430
515
%Yec
103
98
101
96
100
NA
101
101
98
NA
99
101
100
104
93
94
NA
100
101
45
matsp
dup
95430
515
%tec
103
99
102
96
100
NA
101
101
100
NA
99
101
100
102
93
93
NA
100
100
46
kitchen
tap
95430
518
M0rt
20
0.5
1.7
2
0.5
18
2
12400
5
10
40.5
16
0.88
5360
1
0.2
5
10
1500
2
32400
3.
14500
1
15
140
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
46
lab dup.
95430
518
ug/l
0.5
1.7
43.6
0.89
2
1
U
P
P
U
U
46
matrix
spike
95430
518
%tec
116
106
99
101
117
100
46
matsp
dup
9543C
518
%rec
116
i07
98
100
118
JI01
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-1,
Page: lofl
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-2. QC Data for General Chemistry Measurements in Drinking Water Samples
Station Number
Sample
Location
EPA Number
Mercury
Lead,
Purged Tap
Lead,
First Pour
Chloride
Site Number
Sample
Location
EPA Number
Chloride
Site Number
Sample
Location
EPA Number
Lead-
Fir
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Site Number
Sample
Location
EPA Number
Fluoride
Chloride
Sulfate
'41
kitchen tap
95430510
0.251 mg/l
7.77 mg/l
2.99 mg/l
41
lab dup.
95430510
0.249 mg/l
7.72 mg/l
2.71 mg/l
41
matrix
spike
95430510
% rec
90.5
101
90.6
41
matrix
spike
dup.
95430510
% rec
86.8
101
92.3
35
outdoor tap
95430516
0.1 92 mg/l
5.06 mg/l
35
field dup
outdoor tap
95430517
0.1 93 mg/l
5.07 mg/l
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-2, Page: 2 of 2
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-3. Matrix spiked/matrix spiked duplicate (MS/MSD) Organics Measurements of Samples 10, 11, ai
Station Number
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1 ,1-dichlbroethene
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene .
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,2-DichIoroethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 H-lndole, dibromo
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Hexanone
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
2,2-Dichloropropane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-DinitrotoIuene
2-Butanone
Unas
Pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
142289
122667
75343
78875
75354
96128
96184
79005
95636
95501
87616
108678
563586
107062
106934
106467
120821
630206
71556
541731
606202
591786
88062
88755
594207
120832
105679
121142
78933
10
Field
Sample
94334301-0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5 .
3.5
3.5
3.5
35
3.4
3.5
15.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
J
J
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
(MS)1
94334301-S1
86.66
97.33
95.91
100.44
76.67
89.58
97.11
83.72
79.59
47.07
84.58
88.65
91.82
70.17
72.56
46.08
65.93
92.8
74.01
36
92.12
NAR
10
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSDy
94334301-S2
81.95
92.5
87.95
75.59
84.84
87.39
88.93
77.92
77.03
53.52
80.01
83.45
83.5
71.31
69.84
49.07
68.94
85.24
70.92
34
82.29
NAR
11
FffiW
Sample
94334302-0
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
11
Matrix Spike
&/IS)1
94334302-S1
68.14
65.36
71.51
62.79
85.44
86.22
82.59
80.3
78.46
87.7
11
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSD}*
94334302-S2
31.89
29.38
36.81
27.5
72.25
72.18
44.85
60.1
66.33
71.14
12A
Field
Sample
95080022-0
id12A
12A
Matrix Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Target Compound
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylpheno!
4-Nitrophenol
4-Nitroaniiine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Methylphenol
9H-Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
Benzene
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Untts
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS*
95498
95954
95578
95487
91587
51285
88744
99092
59507
100027
100016
534521
106434
7005723
101553
108101
106445
86737
83329
208968
67641
15972608
309002
319846
62533
120127
1912249
2642719
86500
71432
205992
56553
50328
10
Field
Sample
3.5
3.5
0.95
51.3
78
9.75
9.75
32.5
52
52
3.5
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
{MS}1
86.05
76.75
73
74
75
100.82
NAR
10
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSDf
80.56
73.61
75
69
65
92.2
NAR
11
Held
Sample
108
108
108
108
1080
108
108
108
541
108
1080
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
Matrix Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Station Number
Target Compound
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzole acid
Benzonrtrile, 2,6-dichlo
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Beta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethyi)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Butylbenzylphthalate
Butyltin trichloride
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Chrysene
cis^1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA(dacthal)
Unte
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
191242
65850
1194656
207089
100516
319857
39638329
111444
111911
117817
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
85687
1118463
56235
786196
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
5598130
218019
156592
10061015
56724
75990
18611321
10
Field
Sample
39
9.75
195
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
32.5
130
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
163
22.8
3.5
3.7
39
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
10
Matrix Spike
(MS)'
87
84.45
114.35
50.24
32.69
81.61
67.11
84.37
102.03
99
89.92
92.27
49.38
10
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSD}*
81
81.74
98.16
60.24
48.78
75.12
71.67
80.54
91.37
85
85.33
87.08
58.93
11
Reid
Sample
108
1080
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
11
Matrix Spike
$tS}1
90.66
51.25
90.04
90.49
90.29
85.52
90.32
95
92.17
94.73
11
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSD}*
75.27
49.07
74.41
57.01
49.52
43.53
56.76
80
78
76.75
12A
Fiefd
Sample
10.7
U
12A
Matrix Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Target Compound
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-0
Demeton-s
Di-n-octylphthalate
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Diazinon
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibutyttin dichloride
Dicamba
Dichlorobenzoic Acid
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethoate
Dimethylphthalate
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosutfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1, 2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Unfe
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
PS/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS*
1861321
319868
298033
126750
117840
84742
333415
132649
53703
124481
74953
683181
[J918009
75718
120365
51338273
60571
84662
60515
131113
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
72208
7421934
53494705
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
10
Field
Sample
9.75
22.8
22.8
26
3.5
3.5
3.5
19.5
26
97.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
9.75
19.5
19.5
19.5
32.5
48.8
3.5
22.8
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
{MS)1
85
38.87
111.76
62.49
80
86
79
92
90
68
76
110.13
10
Matrix Splice
Duplicate
PSD}*
83
52.54
95.02
57.25
82
83
78
83
87
62
73
107.45
11
Field i
Sample
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
MattkSpike
«'
96.79
97
87.63
92.65
97.15
92.28
11
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
$/ISD>*
81.26
239.72
71.19
77.5
80.73
76.57
12A
FieW
Sample
10.8
u
12A
MatrkSpike
{MS)1
23"
7
J
12A
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
169
J
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E,
Table E-k
Page: 4 of 7
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Station Number
Target Compound
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Imidan
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
loxynil
Isophorone
Isopropylbenzene
Lindane
Malathion E50
Mercury Methyl
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
MP-Xylene
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Butylbenzene
n-Propylbenzene
Unfe
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
(jg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/kp
CAS#
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
206440
59756604
944229
76448
1024573
118741
87683
67721
732116
193395
1689834
78591
98828
58899
121755
115093
150505
51218452
16752775
72435
75092
21087649
86306
62759
104518
103651
10
Field
Sample
26
3.5
22.8
32.5
22.8
260
19.5
9.75
9.75
3.5
35.8
3.5
9.75
26
52
97.5
19.5
3.5
32.5
7
3.5
3.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
{MS)1
84.42
80
86
71.09
91.9
81
78
120.99
160.53
69.23
83.17
10
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
$/ISD>*
78.63
67
81
70.05
87.27
71
86
108.83
152.09
64.65
78.55
11
Reid
Sample
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
11
Matrix Spike
(MSS1
95.91
92.29
75.9
62.29
93.2
90.73
11
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSDJ*
76.65
75.13
39.61
31
78.97
61.21
12A
Ffetd
Sample
5.76
U
J
12A
Matrix Spike
(MS?
109J25
J
12A
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSB)1
NA
R
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-3, Page: 5 of 7
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Station Number
Target Compound
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P,P'-DDE
P,P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
Parathion
Parathion-methyl
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phenol
Phorate
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Pyrene
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butylbenzene
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Unfts
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
621647
91203
91576
15299997
98953
27314132
95476
42874033
99876
72559
50293
72548
56382
298000
40487421
87865
85018
4901513
108952
298022
7287196
23950585
129000
1918167
299843
135988
122349
100425
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
98066
10
Field
Sample
17.5
97.5
48.8
3.5
84.5
3.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
26
22.8
48.8
22.8
32.5
97.5
65
22.8
3.5
32.5
3.5
19.5
22.8
32.5
163
3.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Tar0et Compound
Tetrabutyto'n
Tetrachloroethene
.Toluene
Total Xylenes
Toxaphene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Tributyltin chloride
Trichloroethene
Trichlorpfluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Units
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
gg/kg
gg/kg
MS/kg
CAS*
1461252
127184
108883
1330207
8001352
156605
10061026
1461229
79016
75694
1582098
75014
10
Field
Sample
3.5
3.5
10.5
390
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.5
48.8
3.5
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix Spike
{MS)'
76.53
90.21
0
91.67
38.92
74.26
76.81
93.73
10
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
PSD}'
72.41
83.68
0
85.52
50.56
69.99
68.94
85.91
11
Freld
Sample
11
Matrix Spike
«<
11
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
{MSD)*
12A
Field
Sample
11.3
11.6
U
U
15
!A
Matrix Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-4. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of TSdeflat Samples 13 and 14.
Station Number
Target Compound
SAMPLE NUMBER
1-Naphthol
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydioamba
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Butyltin trichloride
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
. Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dibutyltin dichioride
Dicamba
Dichlorobenzoic Acid
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
cAs#
90153
96128
106934
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
100027
7600502
50594666
15972608
1646873
116063
309002
319846
1912249
86500
2642719
25057890
133904
1194656
314409
1689845
1118463
63252
1563662
786196
57749
101213
5598130
56724
75990
1861321
319868
126750
298033
333415
683181
1918009
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
13
Field
Sample
94334304-0
61
48
55
35
36
73
59
104
60
248
91
60
10
165
47
60
59
67
96
91
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
R
U
U
R
13
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
94334304-S1
101
95
104
60
66
102
87
78
55
33
83
17
42
32
105
93
0
99
93
0
13
.-, Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
. (MsnV
94334304-S2
87
88
84
54
53
83
68
51
50
25
66
14
34
32
77
77
0
81
83
0
14
" Field
Sample
94334300-0
4.882
2.3
2.3
66.5
2.441
2.441
8.31
8.31
27.7
44.3
44.3
33.3
166
4.6
2.441
2.441
27.7
111
139
19.4
33.3
89
8.31
19.4
19.4
22.2
9.3
16.6
22.2
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix Spike
(MS)'
94334300-S1
76
86
88
54.5
54.9
68
73
62
131.61
47.2
51.1
87
157.56
NAR
J
J
14
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
94334300-S2
86
89
80
88.4
91.9
74
78
61
112.9
76
86.9
92
160.8
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-4, Page: 1 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Station Number
I argei 'i>ompomiu
Diphenamid
Dlsulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthlon
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Imidan
loxynil
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Mercury Methyl
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Napropamide
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetraohl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/Kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
P,9/kfl
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
g/kg
OAS#
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
563122
13194484
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
732116
1689834
58899
121755
94746
93652
2032657
115093
150505
51218452
16752775
72435
21087649
15299997
27314132
42874033
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
7287196
23950585
114261
1918167
299843
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
13
_ Field „
Sample
44
120
123
30
33
33
61
48
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
13
Matrix
— Spike -
(MS)1
28
89
90
67
73
80
87
93
13
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(Mfirn1
30
80
78
40
55
68
75
79
14
Field
Sample
83.1
16.6
16.6
16.6
8.31
16.6
16.6
16.6
27.7
41.6
19.4
22.2
19.4
27.7
19.4
222
16.6
8.31
8.31
30.5
8.31
22.2
488.2
110
44.3
83.1
2.441
16.6
27.7
83.1
41.6
72.1
41.6
19.4
27.7
83.1
2.441
55.4
19.4
27.7
16.6
19.4
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix Spike
(MS)'
48
61
20
46.4
86
79
53.1
55
74
47
75
81
97
35
51.5
72
66
14
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station Number
Target Oompound--
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tetrabutyltin
Toxaphene
Tributyltin chloride
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Vydate
Unite
ug/kg
tig/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
..CAS*
34014181
5902512
1461252
8001352
1461229
55335063
1582098
23135220
13
Field
Sample
49
u
13
Matrix
(MS)
99
r
1
13
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
83
14
Field
Sample
27.7
139
4.8
333
5
41.6
2.441
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix Spike
""(MS)'
61
67
37.81
178.16
62
43.6
J
J
14
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
65
70
50.57
186.69
63
67.9
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-4, Page: 3 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Table E-5. MS/MSD Organics Measurements of Samples 2 and 23.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene
1-Naphthol
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2-Nitrotoiuene
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg-
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
106467
99650
90153
122667
96184
96128
95636
95501
87616
79005
78875
75354
75343
71556
630206
563586
541731
142289
120821
108678
107062
106934
88722
95498
95954
95578
2
Field
Sample
95080026-0
0.28
2
0.5
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080026-S1
60.24
105
4.85
82.03
59.87
57.52
58.55
61
91.54
79.49
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSDf
95080026-S2
64.12
64
6.075
82.37
63.59
62.35
60.34
16
95.35
88.99
U
23
Field
Sample
95080020-0
2.2
469.7
125
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
22
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
281.8
2.2
125
125
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
(MSf
95080020-S1
66.19
125
88.3
95.2
60.54
83.84
67.12
25.5
97.3
95.72
113.3
96.05
94.08
46.7
90.95
70.44
79.79
31.74
86.21
85.73
60.99
83.59
90.67
89.84
J
J
NAR
23
Matrix;
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080020-S2
83.78
105
86.85
112.9
56.66
102.8
84.34
30.32
114.6
109.6
123
109.5
105.6
37.62
98.99
86.16
97.78
36.25
106.4
104.5
67.79
100.6
89.83
81.52
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS);
95080020-S3
43
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080020-S^
32
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-5, Page: Iof8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
2-Methylphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitrophenol
2-Nitroaniline
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Hexanone
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
3-OH-Carbofuran
4-Nitrophenol
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenoI
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether
4-Nitrotoluene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Chlorotoluene
9H-Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
ng/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ng/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
95487
91587
88755
88744
88062
591786
606202
594207
78933
51285
121142
120832
105679
99092
16655826
100027
101553
106445
534521
100016
59507
7005723
99990
108101
106434
86737
83329
208968
2
Field
Sample
0.28
0.28
0.57
2.8
0.28
2
5.7
2
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.5
2.8
028
0.28
5.7
0.57
0.28
0.28
2
0.28
0.017
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
2
Matrix
Spike
ps>1
79.64
68.87
88.9
94.24
91.74
70
149.82
78
82.45
82
96.83
4.625
66.07
80.7
78.15
119.54
71.5
88.84
76.98
61
84.99
79.45
81.86
J
U
J
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(M$0)f
90.85
70.11
95.11
102.93
97.7
28
134.2
36
90.21
89.07
98.17
5.875
69.34
78.86
86.61
116.36
64.85
93.81
74.33
17
84.53
78.21
80.89
J
J
U
J
23
Field
Sample
125
125
626
626
250
11.1
281.8
22
24.8
5010
281.8
125
125
626
1250
125
54.6
2500
626
125
125
281.8
2.2
2.2
125
125
125
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
J
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
{MS}1
90.59
86.05
58.5
84.74
92.96
35.17
68.95
89.19
72.32
129
92.77
102.1
12.95
105.6
92.1
92.49
63.18
17.46
93.45
89.9
28.26
71.39
91.76
87.16
89.34
J
J
NAR
NAR
J
J
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
{MSDf
85.64
82.58
62.21
93.48
92.8
48.25
76.22
107.1
45.86
103
91.54
108.1
19.33
103.6
90.49
89.43
41.49
32.07
93.94
89.67
68.45
92.7
90.5
86.38
88.45
J
NAR
NAR
J
J
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
psj*
71
45
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD}1
54
32
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table
E-5, Page: 2 of 8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Acetone
Alachlor
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Benzene, Trinitro-
Benzene
Benzene,
2-methyl-1 ,3,5-trinitro-
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-nitr
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)ahthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Beta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)etner
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Units
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
gg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/Kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Ma/kg
CAS#
67641
15972608
1646873
116063
309002
319846
62533
120127
19312249
86500
2642719
99354
71432
118967
99081
205992
56553
50328
191242
65850
1194656
207089
100516
319857
39638329
111911
111444
2
field
Sample
0.5
0.5
028
0.28
2
2
2
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
5.7
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
PS)1
4.625
5.875
73.74
91.96
67
116
59
98
98.41
100.03
101.33
12.82
95.49
75.03
71.94
77.65
77.75
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
4.675
9.225
80.62
92.02
42
65
17
103.23
100.47
100.6
103.49
52.05
99.01
83.02
81.66
85.95
87.69
U
U
23
flteM
Sample
31.3
265
23
23
125
74
118
118
469.7
2.2
469.7
281.8
125
125
125
125
2500
147
125
125
23
125
125
125
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95
119
104
1.24
90.74
89
27
172
95.48
104
94.99
91.99
86.02
71.85
105.3
97
92.1
84.85
74
85.98
83.7
85.2
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
110
105
102
10.73
91.54
93
28
157
109.1
75
94.97
88.17
87.98
80.61
116.2
95
94.79
87.88
74
70.27
79.11
68.33
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
23
Matrix
Spike
psf
38
NkR
N
AR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1 ,
33
NAR
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-5, Page: 3 of 8
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Chrysene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Units
pg/kg
ua/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
.pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS*
117817
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
85687
63252
1563662
56235
786196
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
5598130
218019
156592
10061015
56724
319868
126750
298033
84742
117840
2
field
Sample
0.28
0.28
0.5
0.5
.0.28
0.075
1.4
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
2
Matrix
Spike
ps>1
292.13
99.13
4.675
5.9
97.79
93.55
98.53
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
101.15
106.07
6.65
6.925
101.65
96.31
99.6
U
U
23
Field
Sample
626
295
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.4
626
2.2
74
313
2.2
2.2
0.6
2.2
295
59
125
2.2
88
23
103
103
856
626
U
U
U
U
UJ
R
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
R
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
101.6
115
75.42
124.8
14.97
4.1
47.67
104.6
59.51
61
108
74.24
104.5
94.75
126
67
105
87.85
11.8
78
116
39
93.68
92.4
J
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(NISDJ1
95.96
62
91.38
124.5
16.57
1.72
69.29
97.48
48.99
62
105
90.33
113.4
103.8
128.5
89
99.55
97.83
9.9
73
117
47
83.01
90.64
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table\E-5, Page: 4of8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Diazinon
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dieidrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethoate
Dimethylphthalate
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1, 2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Units
ug/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
CAS#
333415
132649
53703
124481
74953
75718
60571
84662
60515
131113
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
206440
2
field
Sample
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.01
J
U
U
U
J
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
86.23
102.04
98.26
96.15
93.72
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MW
86.98
103.23
101.85
98.59
96.73
23
Reid
Sample .,
59
125
125
2.2
2.2
47
125
59
125
221
44
47
47
23
47
47
47
74
111
2.2
52
59
2.2
52
118
52
44.1
UJ
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1 i
86.96
88.05
7.76
123.8
95.08
116
93.76
92.5
53
63
103
93
103
92
116
77
56
95
85.58
53
76.82
53
86.94
NAR
J
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MS0)1
89.8
88.08
5.13
127.3
104
104
91.72
90.89
63
65
105
79
88
73
99
59
65
99
114.3
54
96.42
61
85.89
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-5, Page: 5 of 8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Imidan
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isopropylbenzene
Lindane
Malathion E50
Mercaptodimethur
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
MP-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Units
PS/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/Kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
CAS#
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
118741
87683
67721
732116
193395
78591
98828
58899
121755
2032657
150505
51218452
16752775
72435
75092
21087649
103651
104518
62759
86306
621647
91576
2
field
Sample
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1
0.5
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
ps>1
91.61
52.69
53.66
104.31
80.92
9.125
4
90.67
92.37
82.22
72.97
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
9228
55.68
58.26
108.95
91.66
12.4
4.425
89.82
92.92
92.22
79.54
U
U
23
Field
Sample
442
44
23
23
125
2.2
81
125
125
2.2
23
59
88
295
47
59
11.1
74
4.4
2.2
2.2
626
125
125
125
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
R
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
ps)1
11
63
82
99
89
51.22
8.89
85.77
85.95
96.36
101
36
•11
81
66
56
98.18
57
73.8
83.95
47.58
69.52
92.37
97.8
81.29
NAR
J
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
7
63
82
91
88.8
53.34
3.59
88.49
80.37
113.4
95
49
15
88
352
50
107
65
93.5
101.6
72.5
42.93
91.02
84.96
81.71
NAR
J
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
{MSD)1
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
AppendixE, Table\E-5, Page: 6of8
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Naphthalene
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P,P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
P.P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Pyrene
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butyl benzene
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
M9/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
91203
15299997
98953
27314132
95476
42874033
99876
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
85018
108952
298022
1918021
7287196
23950585
114261
129000
1918167
299843
135988
122349
100425
3689245
2
Field
Sample
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.28
0.28
0.5
0.28
U
NAR
U
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(Msr
67.75
76
103.61
88.11
66.41
5.05
95.77
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
71.5
31
106.71
87.34
77.06
5.475
97.6
U
23
Field
Sample
2.2
221
469.7
147
2.2
147
22
47
47
47
52
59
111
1250
. 125
125
52
74
295
125
177
52
2.2
74
2.2
44
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
23
Matrix
Spike
(MSJ*
32.81
78
119
33
74.85
85
74.06
78
90
95
146
91.81
89.22
92.04
75
110
101.5
80
87.74
71
27.21
69
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSDf
41.16
82
92
26
96.07
88
95.66
70
84
90
130
86.57
88.43
83.45
68
119
98.17
84
103.9
70
48.03
68
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
;
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
t\
AR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(ft/ISO)1
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-5, Page: 7 of 8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetryl
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Toxaphene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethe.ne
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Vydate
Units
Ma/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
35400432
34014181
5902512
98066
127184
479458
108883
1330207
8001352
156605
10061026
79016
75694
1582098
75014
23135220
2
Field
Sample
2
0.5
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS>1
166
3.85
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
57
3.975
U
23
field
Sample
52
111
221
2.2
2.2
469.7
2.2
4.4
939
2.2
2.2
2.2
111
2.2
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
103
133
106.6
78.03
80.38
74.2
87.5
10.6
71.94
100.6
142
101.4
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike \
Duplicate
(MSDf
95
140
113.9
93.6
99.13
94.3
96.7
9.6
85.87
101.1
147
115.4
NAR
NAR
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1:
NAR
23
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
NAR
Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-5, Page: 8 of 8
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995 •
Table E-6. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 4 and 5.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1-Naphthol
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Triohloroethane
1,1,1 ,2-Tetraohloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3;5-Trimethylbenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Hexanone
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
3-OH-Carbofuran
4-Nitrophenol
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Chlorotoluene
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acetone
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
AzinDhos-methvl
Units
pa/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
|jg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
Ms/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/ka
CAS#
106467
90153
96184
96128
95636
95501
87616
79005
78875
75354
75343
71556
630206
563586
541731
142289
120821
108678
107062
106934
94757
93765
93801
95498
95954
88062
591786
594207
78933
94826
51365
6655826
100027
108101
106434
7600502
67641
50594666
5972608
309002
319846
9312249
86500
4
Field
Sample
95080024-0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.165
0.131
0.149
1
0.1
0.1
1
1
5
0.199
0.161
0.273
1
1
0.164
5
0.671
0.3
0.03
0.03
0.1
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
u
4
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080024-S1
101
100
87
100
105
77
102
106
117
104
98
95
102
103
102
83
101
104
99
101
84
97
104
113
97
97
92
114
83
96
0
104
107
77
129
0
81
24
68
91
NAR
4
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080024-S2
103
104
83
98
102
80
101
101
104
98
95
96
98
101
101
84
102
100
98
106
85
84
101
137
74
97
88
111
102
90
0
104
105
125
116
0
79
17
73
90
NAR
5
Field
Sample
95080021-0
6.3
18.1
U
5
Matrix
Spike
(MSr
95080021-S1
44
97
5
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080021 -S
54
107
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-6, Page: Iof4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzene
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHG
Bicyclo[2.2. 1 ]hept-5-ene
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Bromoxynil
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA (dacthal)
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dicamba
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorprop
DICLOFOP-METHYL
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Diphenamid
Units
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
US/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mq/ka
CAS#
2642719
25057890
71432
133904
1194656
319857
115286
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
1689845
63252
1563662
56235
786196
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
2921882
5598130
156592
10061015
56724
75990
8611321
319868
126750
298033
333415
124481
74953
1918009
75718
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
957517
4
Field
Sample
0.1
0.246
0.07
0.163
0.2
0.03
0.56
0.4
1
1
1
2
1
0.165
1
0.1
0.36
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.1
1
1.1
0.1
0.112
0.128
0.03
0.1 .
0.1
0.1
1
1
0.163
1
0.18
0.26
0.05
0.1
0.246
0.3
U
U
J
R
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
R
U
4
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
85
56
102
0
77
75
101
112
99
92
124
60
98
54
103
146
102
99
77
103
97
43
108
767
256
97
102
126
106
107
101
73
0
79
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
MAR
4
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
92
44
97
0
73
79
100
111
97
99
108
45
94
89
101
133
99
93
83
101
95
0
82
775
232
97
101
119
102
105
94
73
0
94
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
5
FieW
Sample
3.1
7.2
U
5
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
62
119
5
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)*
70
126
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-6, Page: 2 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Imidan
loxynil
Isopropylbenzene
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
mp-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
Naphthalene
Napropamide
Nortlurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P.P'-DDT
'
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
PS/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/ka
CAS#
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
87683
732116
1689834
98828
58899
121755
94746
93652
2032657
150505
51218452
72435
75092
21087649
103651
104518
91203
5299997
7314132
95476
2874033
99876
50293
4
- Field
Sample
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.1
1
0.1
0.1
1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1
0.1
0.03
0.03
1
0.1
0.171
1
0.03
0.1
0.325
0.333
0.1
0.4
0.05
0.1
1
0.1
2
1
1
1
0.3
0.2
1
0.2
1
0.05
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
4
Matrix
"Spike
(MS)1
271
75
72
77
74
81
68
102
72
102
73
151 .
85
70
44
98
37
104
81
113
97
58
88
53
84
204
85
101
101
101
77
99
95
101
69
99
0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
4
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSO)1
227
81
76
97
94
96
67
98
97
100
86
89
78
79
33
94
38
103
86
120
103
72
82
83
82
179
54
99
98
98
78
120
90
99
82
98
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
NAR
5
~ FieJ
Samf
21.9
j
0" '
)le
5
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
52
5
Matrix
jC*Vll*tft
--- spike
Duplicate
(MSD)*
70
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-6, Page: 3 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
P,P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalln
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butylbenzene
Silvex
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Toxaphene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichlorqpropene
Trichlopyr
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS'#
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
7287196
23950585
114261
1918167
299843
135988
93721
122349
100425
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
98066
127184
108883
1330207
8001352
156605
10061026
55335063
79016
75694
1582098
75014
4
Field
Sample
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.09
0.09
0.1
0.166
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
1
0.13
0.1
1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
1
1
1
2
1.07
1
0.94
0.132
1
1
0.1
1
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4
Matrix
" Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-7. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 5 and 8.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1-Naphthol
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
3-OH-Carbofuran
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyL
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kq
CAS#
90153
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
2e+07
100027
7600502
50594666
15972608
309002
319846
1912249
86500
2642719
25057890
133904
1194656
319857
314409
1689845
63252
26+06
786196
57749
101213
2921882
5598130
56724
75990
1861321
319868
126750
298033
333415
1918009
120365
1338273
60571
60515
5
Field ,
Sample
95080021-0
6.3
18.1
3.1
7.2
U
U
5
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
95080021 -S
43.892
96.592
61.94
119.12
5
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(NISD)1
95080021-S2
54.303
106.61
70.256
125.63
8
Field
Sample
95240107-0
42
'34
38
25
25
51
42
230
42
170
62
10
10
17
28
28
63
42
1.5
10
70
42
17
70
70
12
12
21
850
34
10
12
12
14
34
46
63
10
14
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
. U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
NJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
u
8
Matrix
Spike
(iwsr
952401 07-S1
70.57
67.78
74.71
65.32
61.69
67.76
64.82
111.96
73.49
39.53
98.32
95.38
104.11
65.26
90.24
73.84
24.18
81.63
128.19
77.49
51.26
110.16
79.14
70.36
117.85
153.71
71.59
76.81
61.48
04.28
64.56
8
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
952401 07-S
74.6
74.43
79.47
61.13
65.59
71.69
67.72
178.98
62.8
38.18
88.08
79.7
90.15
53.92
88.31
86.95
17
67.07
18.11
70.19
60.7
11.64
95.03
71.49
06.35
37.85
73.45
82.25
70.02
93.47
42.72
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-7, Page: lofS
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Dinoseb
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralln (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Imidan
loxynil
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Napropamide
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
P,P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kq
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/k£
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kq
CAS#
88857
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
563122
13194484
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
732116
1689834
58899
121755
94746
93652
2e+06
150505
51218452
72435
21087649
15299997
27314132
42874033
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
5
Field
Sample
21.9
5
Matrix
Spike
(MS)'
52.267
5
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
70.103
8
i
Field
Sample
150
52
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
17
26
12
14
12
17
12
100
10
10
10
19
42
10
14
85
85
28
70
10
17
52
35
70
10
3
10
12
14
26
20
23
23
12
42
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
NJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
8
Matrix .
Spike
(MS)1
56.94
88.48
113.55
101.19
115.66
54.04
112.18
70.49
91.79
123.17
137.56
126.97
81.29
113.31
50.17
116.49
39.69
96.48
83.48
88.8
78.98
26.01
71.29
111.59
99.15
24.41
150.39
129.29
111.78
145.94
72.77
73.21
66.21
67.47
133.28
56.04
8
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MS0)1
53.18
68.15
101.59
93.26
101.75
56.57
99.57
57.01
90.49
109.2
127.14
99.76
65.16
105.31
48.36
110.87
48.99
90.14
88.05
91.46
76.39
26.18
55.66
95.75
90.38
25.5
32.92
11.62
08.53
37.85
61.78
82.55
73.83
75.17
99.5
55.36
.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
AppendixE, Table E-7, Page: 2 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Toxaphene
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
7287196
23950585
114261
1918167
299843
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
8001352
55335063
1582098
5
~ Field
Sample
3.1
U
5
Matrix ,
Spike
(MS)1
136.59
5
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
151.25
8
FteU
Samp
17
70
42
12
34
17
10
12
26
52
350
34
26
Jl
le
UJ
UJ
u
U
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
u
8
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
53.23
4.69
100.12
111.56
90.31
119.16
131.5
79.48
104.63
70.41
81.02
8
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)'
38.84
20.87
86.57
107.34
91.23
95.93
102.81
62.56
102.71
75.62
79.17
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-7, Page: 3 of 3
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994-1995
Table E-8. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Sample 7.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB ,
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acifluorfen (Blazer)
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzoic acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb .
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Units
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
M9/kg
Ma/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mfl/Kq
CAS#
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
100027
7600502
62476599
15972608
309002
319846
1912249
86500
2642719
25057890
133904
1194656
319857
314409
1689845
786196
57749
101213
2921882
5598130
56724
75990
1861321
319868
126750
298033
333415
1918009
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
957517
298044
33213659
7
Field
Sample
95240104-0
0.12
0.1
0.12
0.08
0.08
0.16
0.13
0
0.53
0.2
0.13
0.13
0
0.1
0.13
0.14
0.2
0.2
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
UJ
UJ
U
REJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
7
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
952401 04-S1
42.93
47.36
57.11
82.21
54.18
52.09
47.5
8.63
0.94
32.02
16.19
18
46.73
0.41
5.69
4.18
62.1
76.85
33.77
7
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
952401 04-S2
109.71
128.88
117.76
84.94
81.89
104.55
62.71
10.88
1.52
22.72
27.27
3.3
39.99
2.15
4.21
43.64
112.64
120.55
29.14
7
Field
Sample
95240103-0
0.29
0.048
0.048
0.08
0.21
0.13
1.9
0.048
0.32
0.08
0.32
0.1
0.044
0.056
0.096
0.048
0.056
0.056 ,
0.23
0.048
0.064
0.24
0.28
0.048
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
J
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
7
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
952401 03-S1
85.48
9
86.09
96.76
109
123.32
72.31
107.57
117.96
98.27
79
34.53
74.48
89.94
94.89
7
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(IVISD)'
952401 03-S2
85.79
10
87.6
76.13
76
127
79.41
105.1
74.92
99.16
80
33.58
78.76
83.83
96.75
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-8, Page: Iof3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Imidan
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
loxynil
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Metribuzin
Napropamide
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
P.P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Ramrod
Units
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
M9/kg
pg/kg
ng/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
PS/kg
pg/kg
PS/kg
pg/kg
ng/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/ka
CAS#
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
563122
13194484
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
732116
193395
1689834
58899
121755
94746
93652
150505
51218452
72435
21087649
5299997
27314132
42874033
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
0487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
7287196
3950585
1918167
7
Field
Sample
0.13
0.26
0.26
0
0.07
0,07
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
7
Matrix -
Spike
(MS)1
42.34
47.18
60.82
81.96
35.47
91.5
0.55
7
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
39.7
106.62
101.8
103.61
98.13
111.51
8.47
7
Field
Sample
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.08
0.07
0.056
0.064
0.056
0.08
0.034
0.48
0.048
0.048
0.048
0.088
0.048
0.064
0.13
0.32
0.048
0.08
0.2
1
0.32
0.12
0.009
0.048
0.056
0.031
0.12
0.056
0.08
0.32
0.19
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7
, , Matrix, M
Spike
(M8T
87.54
87.49
89.05
90.27
63.73
105.25
84.85
88.96
110.62
39.28
84.15
17
100.01
133.47
73.56
73.65
89.21
114.13
86.07
101
64
90.74
89.52
69.58
67.894
33
93.94
90.29
7
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
91.47
86.81
91.89
91
64.4
105.5
84.51
87.05
111.7
42.55
86.41
17
101.8
133.3
120.4
72.29
92.19
115,4
84.41
98
62
91.79
92.14
69.2
60.87
26
86.95
87.67
I
I
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-8, Page: 2 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Ronnel
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Toxaphene
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Units
pg/kg
pg/kp
us/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kp
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
299843
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
8001352
55335063
1582098
7
Field
Sample
0.1
0.03
U
J
7
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
66.59
55.27
7
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
115.33
111.74
7
Field
Sample
0.056
0.022
0.048
0.056
0.12
0.24
1.6
0.12
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
7
Matrix
Spike
{iwsr
142.95
136.01
64.39
78.83
63.47
7
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-9. MS/MSP Metals Measurements of Samples 2 and 14
STATION
NUMBER
Target
Compound
Sample Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CAS#
7429905
7440360
7440393
7440417
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440508
7439896
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440235
14
Field Sample
94334300-0
5620
4
6.08
0.19
,0.2
1600
11.1
3.84
12900
3170
141
0.05
8.87
730
2910
U
P
U
U
14
Matrix Spike
(MS)*
94334300-S1
85
102
107
91
97
101
85
102
105
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
14
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
94334300-S2
86
103
108
87
98
102
102
100
105
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2
Field
Sample
95080026-0
2
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080026-S1
95
' Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-9, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-10. MS/MSP Metals Measurements of Samples 4 and 23
STATION
NUMBER
Target
Compound
Sample
Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CAS#
7429905
7440360
7440393
7440417
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440508
7439896
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440224
7440235
7440666
23
Field
Sample
95080020-0
15100
4
23.3
0.808
0.2
3850
30.4
28.4
36100
7380
145
0.04
19.6
2680
13300
UN
U
23
Matrix Spike
(MS)*
95080020-S1
11
97
96
91
89
94
87
82
91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)<
95080020-S2
0
96
96
92
93
94
92
80
91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4
Field
Sample
95080024-0
335
0.5
17.1
0.3
0.3
8030
1
1.6
569
3200
27.4
0.1
1.61
1400
0.1
16800
59.5
N
U
B
U
U
U
P
U
P
UN
4
Matrix Spike
(MS)*
95080024-S1
58
100
99
107
96
108
101
105
96
102
45
93
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080024-S2
83
100
98
107
97
108
101
106
98
102
47
91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-10, Page: 1 of 1
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-11. MS/MSP Metals Measurements of Samples 6 and 7
STATION
NUMBER
Target
Compound
Sample
Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CAS#
7429905
7440360
7440393
7440417
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440224
7440235
7440622
7440666
6
Field
Sample
95240100-0
6050
8
14.4
0.229
0.08
1660
11.2
3.94
5.25
20300
3090
130
8.57
358
0.44
132
27.4
35.3
U
U
P
6
Matrix Spike
(MS)<
952401 00-S1
85
94
102
96
92
91
92
92
92
89
. 90
86
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSP)1
952401 00-S2
87
100
108
103
101
96
101
110
98
95
99
94
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7
Field
Sample
95240102-0
0.1
U
7'
Matrix Spike
(MS)<
952401 02-S1
93
7
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
952401 02-S2
90
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17; 1997
Appendix E, Table E-11, Page: 1 of 1
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-12. MS/MSP Metals Measurements of Samples 8 and 9
STATION
NUMBER
Target
Compound
Sample Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium .
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Unite
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CA5#
7429905
7440360
7440393
7440417
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439954
7439965
7439976
7440020
7440097
7440224
7440235
7440622
7440666
8
Field Sample
95240106-0
0.02
U
8
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
952401 06-S1
103
8
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
952401 06-S2
102
9
Field Sample
95240108-0
71
0.5
2.5
0.3.
0.3
12900
1
10
3
4840
22900
110
0.3
8340
0.1
167000
3
11
P
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
UNE
U
PB
9
Matrix Spike
(MS)'
952401 08-S1
108
109
100
97
93
92
102
104
98
82
29
107
99
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-12, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-13. MS/MSD Genera! Chemistry Measurements of Samples 2, 4, 7, and 9.
STATION
NUMBER
Target
Compound
Sample
Number
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
Nh3+Nh4
Nitrate+Nitrite
Total K
Sulfate
Station
Number
Sample
Number
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
Kjel-n
Nh3+Nh4
Nitrate+Nitrite
Total K
Sulfate
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
2
Field
Sample
95080026-0
41.9
0.067
0.052
1.22
51.4
7
J
95240105-0
53.4
0.174
2
Matrix Spike
(MS)1
95080026-S1
104
93
98
101
99
7
952401 05-S1
102
90.5
2
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080026-S2
104
94
97
100
106
7
952401 05-S2
102
91
4
Field
Sample
95080024-0
18.8
0.025
9
U
95240111-0
269
0.106
0.371
0.074
0.245
40.1
J
4
Matrix Spike
(MS)1
95080024-S1
98.4
79.8
9
952401 11 -S1
103
95.5
71.4
118
121
94.5
4
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080024-S2
98.5
85
9
952401 11 -S2
103
95.8
92.5
118
125
94.5
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-13, Page: 1 of 1
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-14. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 10 and 11.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1H-lndole, dibromo
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitrophenol
2-Nitroaniline
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Hexanone
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Nitroaniline
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
CAS#
106467
122667
96184
96128
95636
95501
87616
79005
78875
75354
75343
71556
630206
563586
541731
142289
120821
108678
107062
106934
95498
95954
95578
95487
91587
88755
88744
88062
591786
606202
594207
78933
51285
121142
120832
105679
99092
100027
101553
106445
534521
100016
10
Field
Sample
94334301-0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
35
3.5
3.4
3.5
15.1
U
U
. U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
J
U
J
U
U
10
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
94334301 -S1
72.56
89.58
76.67
83.72
79.59
47.07
97.11
95.91
100.44
97.33
92.8
65.93
88.65
74.01
86.66
46.08
84.58
91.82
70.17
86.05
36
92.12
NAR
10
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
94334301 -S2
69.84
87.39
84.84
77.92
77.03
53.52
88.93
87.95
75.59
92.5
85.24
68.94
83.45
70.92
81.95
49.07
80.01
83.5
71.31
80.56
34
82.29
NAR
11
Field
Sample
94334302-0
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
1080
108
108
108
108
541
108
108
1080
108
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
11
Matrix
Spike
(MS)'
94334302-S1
65.36
68.14
62.79
71.51
93.95
81.17
89.04
83.55
82.59
107.52
86.22
85.44
69.56
87.7
80.3
78.46
36.47
99.74
89.05
89.89
89.87
59.74
J
J
11
, Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)f ,
94334302-S2
29.38
31.89
27.5
36.81
82.51
50.85
64.21
60.69
44.85
88.43
72.18
72.25
53.18
71.14
60.1
66.33
21.88
81.19
73.89
64.83
68.34
41.26
J
J
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-14, Page: lofS
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4jChlorophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Chlorotoluene
9H-Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Benzene
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)anth racene
Berizo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g, h,i)perylene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Beta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Unite
ug/ks
ug/kg
ug/ka
ug/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/ks
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg^
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
59507
7005723
108101
106434
86737
83329
208968
67641
15972608
309002
319846
62533
120127
1912249
86500
2642719
71432
205992
56553
50328
191242
65850
1194656
207089
100516
319857
39638329
111911
111444
117817
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
85687
56235
786196
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
10
Field
Sample
0.95
3.5
51.3
78
9.75
9.75
32.5
52
52
3.5
39
9.75
195
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
32.5
130
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
163
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Mat
Spi
(M£
73
76.75
74
75
100.82
87
84.45
14.35
50.24
32.69
81.61
67.11
84.37
02.03
99
89.92
ritf ,
ke
O1
NAR
10
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
75
73.61
69
65
92.2
81
81.74
98.16
60.24
48.78
75.12
71.67
80.54
91.37
85
85.33
NAR
11
Fieltf
Sample
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
1080
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
11
Matr
Spih
(MS
96.58
89.33
88.91
88.25
89.23
74.4
92.3
92.18
86.14
90.66
51.25
90.04
90.49
90.29
90.32
85.52
95
92.17
ix
e
V
11
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
77.26
72.14
71.4
68.12
67.96
61.29
76.78
76.52
71.99
75.27
49.07
74.41
57.01
49.52
56.76
43.53
80
78
j
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-l 4, Page: 2 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Chrysene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diazinon
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethoate
Dimethylphthalate
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan I
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1, 2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pa/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
5598130
218019
156592
10061015
56724
319868
126750
298033
84742
117840
333415
132649
53703
124481
74953
75718
60571
84662
60515
131113
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
206440
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
118741
87683
67721
10
Field
Sample
22.8
3.5
3.7
39
9.75
22.8
22.8
26
3.5
3.5
3.5
19.5.
26
97.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
9.75
19.5
19.5
19.5
32.5
48.8
3.5
22.8
26
3.5
22.8
32.5
22.8
260
19.5
9.75
9.75
3.5
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
92.27
49.38
85
38.87
111.76
62.49
80
86
79
92
76
90
68
110.13
84.42
86
80
71.09
10
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
87.08
58.93
83
52.54
95.02
57.25
82
83
78
83
73
87
62
107.45
78.63
81
67
70.05
11
Field
Sample
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
'108
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
11
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
94.73
97
96.79
87.63
92.65
97.15
92.28
95.91
92.29
75.9
62.29
11
Matrix
Spike ,
Duplicate
(MSD)1
76.75
239.72
81.26
71.19
77.5
80.73
76.57
fc
76.65
75.13
39.61
31
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-14, Page: 3 of 5
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Imidan
Indenod ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isopropyl benzene
Lindane
Malathfon E50
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
MP-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Naphthalene
N.apropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P.P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
P.P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Pyrene
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butylbenzene
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ng/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg_
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
U.g/kg
CAS#
732116
193395
78591
98828
58899
121755
150505
51218452
72435
75092
21087649
103651
104518
62759
86306
621647
91576
91203
15299997
98953
27314132
95476
42874033
99876
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
85018
108952
298022
7287196
23950585
129000
1918167
299843
135988
122349
100425
3689245
35400432
10
Fiefd
Sample
35.8
3.5
9.75
26
52
97.5
19.5
3.5
32.5
7
3.5
3.5
17.5
97.5
48.8
3.5
84.5
3.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
22.8.
26
48.8
22.8
32.5
97.5
65
22.8
3.5
32.5
3.5
19.5
22.8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
91.9
81
78
120.99
160.53
83.17
69.23
65.28
85.09
80.11
72
90
86
87.87
69.97
10
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
87.27
71
86
108.83
152.09
78.55
64.65
78.53
80.86
76.56
82
88
82
82.9
68.98
11
Field
Sample
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
11
Matrix
Spike
{MS}'
93.2
90.73
93.34
81.08
79.29
90.21
77.13
89.51
89.43
88.1
11
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)*
78.97
61.21
56.14
53.22
43.7
49.95
62.95
72.19
58.53
72.71
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-l 4, Page: 4 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Units
us/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
34014181
5902512
98066
127184
108883
1330207
156605
10061026
79016
75694
1582098
75014
10
Field
Sample
32.5
163 _,
3.5
3.5
3.5
10.5
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.5
48.8
3.5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
10
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
93.58
76.53
90.21
0
91.67
38.92
74.26
76.81
93.73
10
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
88.82
72.41
83.68
0
85.52
50.56
69.99
68.94
85.91
11
Field
Sample
11
Matrix
Spike
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-15. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 12A and 13.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
2,4-D
2.4.5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acifluorfen
Bentazon
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Bromoxynil
Butyltin trichloride
Dalapon
DCPA (dacthal)
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diazinon
Oibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibutyltin dichloride
Dicamba
Dichlorobenzoic Acid
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dinoseb
loxynil
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Mercury Methyl
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Picloram
Urtite
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/ka
ua/kg
ug/kg
Ma/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/ka
ua/ka
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
Ma/ka
ua/ka
Ma/kg
ua/ka
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/ka
ug/kg
ua/ka
ug/kg
ua/ka
ua/ka
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
100027
7600502
50594666
25057890
133904
1689845
1118463
75990
18611321
1861321
319868
126750
298033
84742
117840
333415
132649
53703
124481
74953
683181
1918009
120365
51338273
88857
1689834
94746
93652
2032657
115093
87865
58902
4901513
1918021
12A
Field
Sample
95080022-0
10.7
10.8
5.76
U
U
UJ
12A
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080022-
S1
1380
237
109.25
J
J
J
12A
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080022-
S2
1280
169
J
J
NAR
13
Field
Sample
94334304-0
61
. 48
55
35
36
73
59
104
60
248
91
60
10
165
47
60
59
67
96
91
44
120
123
30
33
33
61
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
R
U
U
R
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
13
Matrix
Spike
(MS)'
94334304-
S1
101
95
104
60
66
102
87
78
55
33
83
17
42
32
105
93
0
99
. 93
0
28
89
90
67
73
60
87
13
Matrix
Spike
Duplicat
)'
94334304-
S2
87
88
84
54
53
83
68
51
50
25
66
14
34
32
77
77
0
81
83
0
30
80
78
40
55
68
75
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-15, Page: 1 of 2
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
?
Target Compound
Silvex
Tetrabutyltin
Tributyltin chloride
Trichlopyr
Unite
us/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
MO/kg
CAS#
93721
1461252
1461229
55335063
12A
Field
Sample
11.3
11.6
U
U
12A
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
65
125
J
J
12A
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
48
117
J
J
13
Field
Sample
48
49
U
U
13
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
93
99
13
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
79
83
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-15, Page: 2 of 2
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-16. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 14 and 2.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene
1-Naphthol
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 ,2-Dlbromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2-Nitrotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methvlphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitrophenol
2-Nitroaniline
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
3-OH-Carbofuran
4-Nitrophenol
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyiether
4-Nitrotoluene
9H-Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Alachlor
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethvl
Units
pg/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
U9/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg^
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg...
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
. pg/kg
CAS#
106467
99650
90153
122667
96128
95501
541731
120821
106934
88722
95954
95578
95487
91587
88755
88744
88062
606202
51285
121142
120832
105679
99092
16655826
100027
101553
106445
534521
100016
59507
7005723
99990
86737
83329
208968
15972608
1646873
116063
309002
319846
62533
120127
1912249
86500
2642719
14
Field
Sample
94334300-
4.882
2.3
2.3
2.441
66.5
2.441
2.441
8.31
8.31
27.7
44.3
44.3
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix
Spike
(MS)'
94334300-
S1
76
86
49.2
88
54.5
54.9
68
NAR
14
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)'
94334300-
S2
86
89
79.7
80
88.4
91.9
74
NAR
2
Field
Sample
95080026-0
0.28
2
0.5
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.57
2.8
0.28
2
5.7
2
0.28
0.28
1.4
0.5
2.8
0.28
0.28
5.7
0.57
0.28
0.28
2
0.28
0.017
0.28
0.5
0.5
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080026-
S1
60.24
105
4.85
82.03
59.87
57.52
58.55
61
91.54
79.49
79.64
68.87
88.9
94.24
91.74
70
149.82
78
82.45
82
96.83
4.625
66.07
80.7
78.15
119.54
71.5
88.84
76.98
61
84.99
79.45
81.86
4.625
5.875
73.74
91.96
U
J
U
J
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080026-
S2
64.12
64
6.075
82.37
63.59
62.35
60.34
16
95.35
88.99
90.85
70.11
95.11
102.93
97.7
28
134.2
36
90.21
89.07
98.17
5.875
69.34
78.86
86.61
116.36
64.85
93.81
74.33
17
84.53
78.21
80.89
4.675
9.225
80.62
92.02
U
J
J
U
J
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-16 Page: I of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Benzene, Trinitro-
Benzene,
2-methyl-1,3,5-trinltro-
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-nitr
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzole acid
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Beia-BHC
Bicyclo[2.2.1lhept-5-ene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethvl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexvl) phthal
Bromacil
Butylbenzylphthalate
Butyltin trichloride
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Chrysene
Coumaphos
Dalapon
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diazinon
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibutyltin dichlorlde
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethoate
Dimethylphthalate
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan I
Endrin Ketone
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
(jg/kg
ug/kg
up/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
Kg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(jg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ng/kg
pg/kg
(jg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
99354
118967
99081
205992
56553
50328
191242
65850
1194656
207089
100516
319857
115286
39638329
111911
111444
117817
314409
85687
1118463
63252
1563662
786196
57749
101213
5598130
218019
56724
75990
319868
126750
298033
84742
117840
333415
132649
53703
683181
60571
84662
60515
131113
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
14
Field
Sample
33.3
8.31
166
4.6
2.441
2.441
27.7
111
139
19.4
33.3
89
8.31
19.4
19.4
22.2
9.3
16.6
22.2
83.1
16.6
16.6
16.6
8.31
16.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
73
62
131.61
47.2
51.1
87
157.56
48
J
J
14
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)'
78
61
112.9
76
86.9
92
160.8
64
J
J
2
Field
Sample
2
2
2
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
5.7
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.5
0.5
0.28
0.075
1.4
0.0087
0.28
0.28
0.28
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
J
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
67
116
59
98
98.41
100.03
101.33
12.82
95.49
75.03
71.94
77.65
77.75
292.13
99.13
4.675
5.9
97.79
93.55
98.53
86.23
102.04
98.26
96.15
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)'
42
65
17
103.23
100.47
100.6
103.49
52.05
99.01
83.02
81.66
85.95
87.69
101.15
106.07
6.65
6.925
101.65
96.31
99.6
86.98
103.23
101.85
98.59
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-16 Page: 2 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Imidan
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Lindane
Malathion E50
Mercaptodimethur
Mercury Methyl
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Nltrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Naphthalene
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
P.P'-DDT
P.P'-DDD
P.P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Units
ua/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
up/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ua/kg
CAS#
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
563122
13194484
122145
115902
55389
206440
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
118741
87683
67721
732116 '
193395
78591
58899
121755
2032657
115093
150505
51218452
16752775
72435
75092
21087649
62759
86306
621647
91576
91203
15299997
98953
27314132
42874033
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
85018
108952
14
Field
Sample
16.6
16.6
27.7
41.6
19.4
22.2
19.4
27.7
19.4
222
16.6
8.31
8.31
30.5
8.31
22.2
488.2
110.
44.3
83.1
2.441
16.6
27.7
83.1
41.6
72.1
16.6
16.6
16.6
19.4
22.2
41.6
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
61
20
46.4
86
79
53.1
55
74
47
75
81
14
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)f
57
17
73.9
95
76
87.3
61
76
37
71
70
2
Field
Sample
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
1
0.5
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
2.8
0.28
0.28
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
NAR
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(Msr
93.72
91.61
52.69
53.66
104.31
80.92
9.125
4
90.67
92.37
82.22
72.97
67.75
76
03.61
88.11
66.41
U
U
2 |
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
96.73
92.28
55.68
58.26
108.95
91.66
12.4
4.425
89.82
92.92
92.22
79.54
71.5
31
106.71
87.34
77.06
U
U
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, TableE-16 Page: 3 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
target Compound
Phorate
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Pyrene
Ramrod
Ronnel
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tetrabutyltin
Tetryl
Toxaphene
Tributyltin chloride
Trifluraline
Vydate
Units
MS/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
US/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
298022
7287196
23950585
114261
129000
1918167
299843
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
1461252
479458
8001352
1461229
1582098
23135220
14
Field
Sample
19.4
27.7
83.1
2.441
55.4
19.4
27.7
16.6
19.4
27.7
139
4.8
333
5
41.6
2.441
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
14
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
97
35
51.5
72
66
61
67
37.81
178.16
62
43.6
J
J
14
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD}<
74
52
86.8
70
65
65
70
50.57
186.69
63
67.9
J
J
2
Field
Sample
0.5
0.28
2
0.5
U
U
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
5.05
95.77
166
3.85
U
U
2
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
5.475
97.6
57
3.975
U
U
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-16 Page: 4 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-17. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Station 23.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2-Nitrotoluene
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitrophenol
2-Nitroaniline
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Hexanone
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
4-Bromophenyl-Phenylether
4-Methylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Units
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
us/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/kg
CAS#
106467
99650
122667
96184
96128
95636
95501
87616
79005
78875
75354
75343
71556
630206
563586
541731
142289
120821
108678
107062
106934
88722
95498
95954
95578
95487
91587
88755
88744
88062
591786
606202
594207
78933
51285
121142
120832
105679
99092
100027
101553
106445
534521
23.0
Field
Sample
95080020-0
2.2
469.7
125.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
281.8
2.2
125.0
125.0
125.0
125.0
626.0
626.0
250.0
11.1
281.8
2.2
24.8
5010.0
281.8
125.0
125.0
626.0
1250.0
125.0
54.6
2500.0
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
J
UJ
23.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080020-S1
66.2
125.0
88.3
95.2
60.5
83.8
67.1
25.5
97.3
95.7
113.3
96.1
94.1
46.7
91.0
70.4
79.8
31.7
86.2
85.7
61.0
83.6
90.7
89.8
90.6
86.1
58.5
84.7
93.0
35.2
69.0
89.2
72.3
129.0
92.8
102.1
13.0
105.6
92.1
92.5
63.2
J
J
NAR
J
J
NAR
NAR
J
J
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080020-S2
83.8
105.0
86.9
112.9
56.7
102.8
84,3
30.3
114.6
109.6
123.0
109.5
105.6
37.6
99.0
86.2
97.8
36.3
106.4
104.5
67.8
100.6
89.8
81.5
85.6
82.6
62.2
93.5
92.8
48.3
76.2
107.1
45.9
103,0
91.5
108.1
19.3
103.6
90.5
89.4
41.5
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
J
J
23.0
Matrix Spike
(MS)1
95080020-S3
43.0
71.0
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSB)1
95080020-S4
32.0
54.0
NAR
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-17, Page: Iof5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenylether
4-Nitrotoluene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Chlorotoluene
9H-Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Benzene, Trinitro-
Benzene
Benzene,
2-methyl-1 ,3,5-trinitro-
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-nitr
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g, h ,i)perylene
Benzole acid
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Benzo[k]fluoranthene .
Benzyl alcohol
Beta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthal
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
us/Kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
100016
59507
7005723
99990
108101
106434
86737
83329
208968
67641
15972608
309002
319846
62533
120127
19312249
86500
2642719
99354
71432
118967
99081
205992
56553
50328
191242
65850
1194656
207089
100516
319857
39638329
111911
111444
117817
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
85687
56235
786196
23.0
Field
Sample
626.0
125.0
125.0
281.8
2.2
2.2
125.0
125.0
125.0
31.3
265.0
23.0
23.0
125.0
74.0
118.0
118.0
469.7
2.2
469.7
281.8
125.0
125.0
125.0
125.0
2500.0
147.0
125.0
125.0
23.0
125.0
125.0
125.0
626.0
295.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.4
626.0
2.2
74.0
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
REJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
REJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
23.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
17.5
93.5
89.9
28.3
71.4
91.8
87.2
89.3
95.0
119.0
104.0
1.2
90.7
89.0
27.0
172.0
95.5
104.0
95.0
92.0
86.0
71.9
105.3
97.0
92.1
84.9
74.0
86.0
83.7
85.2
101.6
115.0
75.4
124.8
15.0
4.1
47.7
104.6
59.5
61.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
J
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
32.1
93.9
89.7
68.5
92.7
90.5
86.4
88.5
110.0
105.0
102.0
10.7
91.5
93.0
28.0
157.0
109.1
75.0
95.0
88.2
88.0
80.6
116.2
95.0
94.8
87.9
74.0
70.3
79.1
68.3
96.0
62.0
91.4
124.5
16.6
1.7
69.3
97.5
49.0
62.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
23.0
Matrix Spike
{MS)1
45.0
38.0
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix
.Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)4
32.0
33.0
NAR
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-17, Page: 2 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Chrysene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diazinon
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethoate
Dimethylphthalate
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan I
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1, 2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluridone
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/ka
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/ka
pg/kg
pa/ka
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/ka
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
5598130
218019
156592
10061015
56724
319868
126750
298033
84742
117840
333415
132649
53703
124481
74953
75718
60571
84662
60515
131113
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
3194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
206440
9756604
23.0
Field
Sample
313.0
2.2
2.2
0.6
2.2
295.0
59.0
125.0
2.2
88.0
23.0
103.0
103.0
856.0
626.0
59.0
125.0
125.0
2.2
2.2
47.0
125.0
59.0
125.0
221.0
44.0
47.0
47.0
23.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
74.0
111.0
2.2
52.0
59.0
2.2
52.0
118.0
52.0
44.1
442.0
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
REJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
REJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
UJ
23.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
108.0
74.2
104.5
94.8
126.0
67.0
105.0
87.9
11.8
78.0
116.0
39.0
93.7
92.4
87.0
88.1
7.8
123.8
95.1
116.0
93.8
92.5
53.0
63.0
103.0
93.0
103.0
92.0
116.0
77.0
56.0
95.0
85.6
53.0
76.8
53.0
86.9
11.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
105.0
90.3
113.4
103.8
128.5
89.0
99.6
97.8
9.9
73.0
117.0
47.0
83.0
90.6
89.8
88.1
5.1
127.3
104.0
104.0
91.7
90.9
63.0
65.0
105.0
79.0
88.0
73.0
99.0
59.0
65.0
99.0
114.3
54.0
96.4
61.0
85.9
7.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
NJAR
23.0
Matrix Spike
{MS^
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-17, Page: 3 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
imidan
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isopropylbenzene
Lin dan e
Malathion E50
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
MP-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodinpropylamine
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
Naphthalene
Napropamide
Nitrobenzene
Norflurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P.P'-DDT
P,P'-DDD
P.P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/Kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
944229
1024573
76448
118741
87683
67721
732116
193395
78591
98828
58899
121755
150505
51218452
72435
75092
21087649
103651
104518
62759
86306
621647
91576
91203
15299997
98953
27314132
95476
42874033
99876
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
85018
108952
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
23.0
Field
Sample
44.0
23.0
23.0
125.0
2.2
81.0
125.0
125.0
2.2
23.0
59.0
88.0
295.0
47.0
59.0
11.1
74.0
4.4
2.2
2.2
626.0
125.0
125.0
125.0
2.2
221.0
469.7
147.0
2.2
147.0
2.2
47.0
47.0
47.0
52.0
59.0
111.0
1250.0
125.0
125.0
52.0
U
U
U
U
U
REJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
.U
U
U
U
U
23.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
63.0
82.0
99.0
89.0
51.2
8.9
85.8
86.0
96.4
101.0
36.0
11.0
81.0
66.0
56.0
98.2
57.0
73.8
84.0
47.6
69.5
92.4
97.8
81.3
32.8
78.0
119.0
33.0
74.9
85.0
74.1
78.0
90.0
95.0
146.0
91.8
89.2
92.0
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
63.0
82.0
91.0
88.8
53.3
3.6
88.5
80.4
113.4
95.0
49.0
15.0
88.0
352.0
50.0
107.0
65.0
93.5
101.6
72.5
42.9
91.0
85.0
81.7
41.2
82.0
92.0
26.0
96.1
88.0
95.7
70.0
84.0
90.0
130.0
86.6
88.4
83.5
NAR
J
NAR
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix Spike
PS)'
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
NAR
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-17, Page: 4 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Pyrene
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butylbenzene
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetryl
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Toxaphene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Unite
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
P9/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
7287196
23950585
129000
1918167
299843
135988
122349
100425
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
98066
127184
479458
108883
1330207
8001352
156605
10061026
79016
75694
1582098
75014
23.0
•
Fie
Sam
74.0
295.0
125.0
177.0
52.0
2.2
74.0
2.2
44.0
52.0
111.0
221.0
2.2
2.2
469.7
2.2
4.4
939.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
111.0
2.2
Id
pie
u
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
REJ
u
u
u
u
23.0
Ma-
Sp
(Mi
75.0
110.0
101.5
80.0
87.7
71.0
27.2
69.0
103.0
133.0
106.6
78.0
80.4
74.2
87.5
10.6
71.9
100.6
142.0
101.4
trix
ike
5>1
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
68.0
119.0
98.2
84.0
103.9
70.0
48.0
68.0
95.0
140.0
113.9
93.6
99.1
94.3
96.7
9.6
85.9
101.1
147.0
115.4
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
23.0
Matrix S
(MS]
'pike
1
NAR
23.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
NAR
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-l 7, Page: 5 of 5
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-18. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Samples 4 and 5.
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Sample Number
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1-Naphthol
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chJoropropane
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichloropropane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
2.4-D
2.4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2-Chlorotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Hexanone
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
4-Chlorotoluene
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acetone
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Units
yg/kg
yg/kg
us/kg
yg/kg
us/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/Kg
yg/kg
CAS#
106467
90153
96184
96128
95636
95501
87616
79005
78875
75354
75343
71556
630206
563586
541731
142289
120821
108678
107062
106934
94757
93765
93801
95498
95954
88062
591786
594207
78933
94826
51365
100027
108101
106434
7600502
67641
50594666
15972608
309002
319846
19312249
86500
4.0
Field
Sample
95080024-0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
1.0
5.0
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.0
1.0
0.2
5.0
0.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
R
U
U
U
U
U
4.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)'
95080024-S1
100.8
99.6
87.1
100.3
104.5
76.7
101.9
106.3
117.1
103.6
98.0
95.4
102.1
102.8
102.1
83.0
101.3
103.5
98.8
101.0
84.0
97.0
104.5
113.0
97.0
96.8
92.0
114.1
83.0
96.0
0.0
103.8
106.9
77.0
128.7
0.0
81.0
24.0
68.0
91.0
NAR
4.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(ft/ISDf
95080024-S2
102.5
103.7
82.9
98.3
102.1
80.0
100.7
101.4
103.8
97.9
94.6
96.0
98.4
100.6
101.4
83.8
102.5
100.2
98.1
106.0
85.0
84.0
100.5
137.0
74.0
96.7
87.5
111.3
102.0
90.0
0.0
104.1
104.5
125.0
116.0
0.0
79.0
17.0
73.0
90.0
NAR
5.0
Field
Sample
95080021-0
6.3
U
5.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95080021-81
43.9
5.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95080021 -S2
54.3
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-18, Page: Iof4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzene
Benzoic acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Bromoxynil
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA (dacthal)
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dicamba
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Unite
jg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
Mg/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
jg/kg
pg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Ma/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Ma/kg
Mg/kg
Ma/kg
M9/kg
Ma/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
Ms/kg
M9/kg
Ma/kg
M9/kg
MS/kg
M9/kg
M9/kg
Mg/kg
Ma/kg
CAS#
2642719
25057890
71432
133904
1194656
319857
115286
314409
108861
74975
75274
75252
74839
1689845
63252
1563662
56235
786196
57749
108907
75003
67663
74873
101213
5598130
156592
10061015
56724
75990
18611321
319868
126750
298033
333415
124481
74953
1918009
75718
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
957517
298044
4.0
Field
Sample
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.6
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.2
1.0
0.1
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.4
0.1
1.0
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.2
1.0
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
U
U
J
R
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
R
U
UJ
4.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
85.0
56.0
102.3
0.0
77.0
75.0
101.3
111.9
98.8
91.9
124.0
60.0
97.5
54.0
103.3
146.0
101.7
99.5
77.0
103.0
97.4
43.0
108.0
767.0
256.0
97.2
102.0
126.0
106.2
107.0
101.0
73.0
0.0
79.0
271.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
4.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
92.0
44.0
97.3
0.0
73.0
79.0
99.6
111.4
97.0
99.5
108.2
45.0
94.4
89.0
101.0
132.6
99.1
93.3
83.0
100.6
94.9
0.0
82.0
775.0
232.0
97.1
100.5
119.0
101.9
105.0
94.0
73.0
0.0
94.0
227.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
5.0
Field
Sample
3.1
7.2
U
5.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
61.9
119.1
5.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)4
70.3
125.6
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-18, Page: 2 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1,2.2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenrthrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexaohloroethane
Imidan
loxynil
Isopropylbenzene
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Mercaptodimethur
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Methylene Chloride
Metribuzin
MP-Xylene
n-Propylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
Naphthalene
Napropamide
Norflurazon
o-Xylene
Oxyfluorfen
p-lsopropyltoluene
P.P'-DDT
Units
pa/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
ua/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/Kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS#
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
87683
67721
732116
1689834
98828
58899
121755
94746
93652
2032657
150505
51218452
72435
75092
21087649
103651
104518
91203
15299997
27314132
95476
42874033
99876
50293
4.0
Field
Sample
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.1
0.2
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.2
1.0
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
4.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
75.0
72.0
77.0
74.0
81.0
68.0
101.8
72.0
102.0
73.0
151.0
85.0
70.0
44.0
98.3
37.0
103.7
81.0
113.0
97.0
58.0
88.0
53.0
84.0
203.9
85.0
101.2
101.4
101.2
76.7
99.0
95.0
101.4
69.0
98.8
0.0
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
4.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
81.0
76.0
97.0
94.0
96.0
67.0
98.1
97.0
100.1
86.0
89.0
78.0
79.0
33.0
93.6
38.0
102.6
86.0
120.0
103.0
72.0
82.0
83.0
82.0
179.3
54.0
99.4
97.8
97.6
78.1
120.0
90.0
98.9
82.0
97.7
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
J
NAR
5.0
Field
Sample
21.9
5.0
, Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
52.3
5.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)'
70.1
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-18, Page: 3 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
P,P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Penditnethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Propoxur
Ramrod
Ronnel
sec-Butylbenzene
Silvex
Simazine
Styrene
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Tert-butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Toxaphene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichlopyr
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trifluraline
Vinyl Chloride
Units
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Mg/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
CAS#
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
7287196
23950585
114261
1918167
299843
135988
93721
122349
100425
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
98066
127184
108883
1330207
8001352
156605
10061026
55335063
79016
75694
1582098
75014
4.0
Field
Sample
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.1
1.0
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
60.0
79.0
77.0
102.0
108.0
107.0
55.0
81.0
77.0
82.0
103.3
101.0
103.0
100.7
83.0
91.0
62.0
101.7
100.2
104.3
101.3
103.0
93.7
97.0
101.2
122.9
66.0
107.7
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
4.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
81.0
85.0
70.0
109.0
105.0
113.0
113.0
98.0
81.0
84.0
99.3
108.0
101.0
95.9
81.0
83.0
59.0
99.2
99.5
101.6
99.2
75.0
97.8
93.8
86.0
98.1
121.1
66.0
103.2
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
NAR
5.0
Field
Sample
3.1
U
5.0
Matrix ,
Spike
(MS)1
136.6
5.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
151.3
Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-18, Page: 4 of 4
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-19. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Sample 7.
STATION NUMBER
;
;
Target Compbund
Sample Number
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acifluorfen (Blazer)
Alachlor
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
BenzonitrileL2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
DICLOFOP-METHYL
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Units
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ya/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
MS/kg
ng/ka
us/kg
pa/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
na/kg
pg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/ka
Ma/kg
Mg/kg
Mg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ua/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
CAS#
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
100027
7600502
62476599
15972608
319846
1912249
86500
2642719
25057890
133904
1194656
319857
314409
1689845
786196
57749
101213
2921882
56724
75990
1861321
319868
126750
298033
333415
1918009
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
957517
298044
33213659
1031078
7.0
Field
Sample
95240104-0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
UJ
UJ
U
R
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
7.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
95240104-
S1
42.9
47.4
57.1
82.2
54.2
52.1
47.5
8.6
0.9
32.0
16.2
18.0
46.7
0.4
5.7
4.2
62.1
76.9
33.8
7.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
95240104-
S2
109.7
128.9
117.8
84.9
81.9
104.6
62.7
10.9
1.5
22.7
27.3
3.3
40.0
2.2
4.2
43.6
112.6
120.6
29,1
7.0
Field
Sample
95240103-0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.9
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
J
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
95240103-
S1
85.5
86.1
96.8
109.0
123.3
72.3
107.6
118.0
98.3
79.0
34.5
74.5
89.9
94.9
87.5
7.0
Matrix;
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)*
95240103-
S2
85.8
87.6
76.1
76.0
127.0
79.4
105.1
74.9
99.2
80.0
33.6
78.8
83.8
96.8
91.5
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-19, Page: I of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
-
Target Compound
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan)
Ethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachl
Ethion
Ethoprop
Ethylbenzene
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Imidan
loxynil
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Methyl Chlorpyrifos
Metribuzin
Napropamide
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
P,P'-DDT
P.P'-DDD
P.P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Picloram
Pronamide (kerb)
Ramrod
Ronnel
Silvex
Units
US/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
M9/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
ug/kg
yg/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/Kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
us/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
yg/kg
CAS#
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
79345
563122
13194484
100414
122145
115902
55389
206440
59756604
944229
1024573
732116
1689834
58899
121755
94746
93652
150505
51218452
72435
21087649
15299997
27314132
42874033
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
1918021
23950585
1918167
299843.
93721
7.0
- Reid
Sample
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
R
U
7.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
42.3
47.2
60.8
82.0
35.5
91.5
0.6
66.6
7.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MS0)1
39.7
106.6
101.8
103.6
98.1
111.5
8.5
115.3
7.0
Field
Sample
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7.0
Matrfc
Spike
(Msr
87.5
89.1
90.3
63.7
105.3
84.9
89.0
110.6
39.3
84.2
100.0
133.5
73.6
73.7
89.2
114.1
86.1
101.0
64.0
90.7
89.5
69.6
67.9
93.9
90.3
7.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
86.8
91.9
91.0
64.4
105.5
84,5
87.1
111.7
42.6
86.4
101.8
133.3
120.4
72.3
92.2
115.4
84.4
98.0
62.0
91.8
92.1
69.2
60.9
87.0
87.7
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-19, Page: 2 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Toxaphene
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Units
)jg/kg
ua/ka
ua/ka
ua/ka
ua/ka
us/kg
ua/ka
M9/kg
CAS#
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
8001352
55335063
1582098
7.0
Reid
Sample
0.0
j
7.0
Matrix
Spike
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994- 1995
Table E-20. MS/MSP Organics Measurements of Sample 8.
STATION NUMBER
»
Target Compound
Sample Number
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TB
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-DB
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid
4-Nitrophenol
5-Hydroxydicamba
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldrin
Alpha-BHC
Atrazine
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphos-ethyl
Bentazon
Benzole acid, 3-amino-2,
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dichlo
Beta-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil
Carbophenothion
Chlordane (Tech)
Chlorpropham (CIPC)
Chlorpyrifos
Chlorpyrifos-ethyl
Coumaphos
Dalapon
DCPA
Delta-BHC
Demeton-s
Demeton-0
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlorprop
Diclofop-methyl
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Dinoseb
Diphenamid
Disulfoton
Units
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pa/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
pg/kg
CAS*
94757
93765
93801
95954
88062
94826
51365
100027
7600502
50594666
15972608
309002
319846
1912249
86500
2642719
25057890
133904
1194656
319857
314409
1689845
786196
57749
101213
2921882
5598130
56724
75990
1861321
319868
126750
298033
333415
1918009
120365
51338273
60571
60515
88857
957517
298044
8
Field
Sample
95240107-0
42
.34
38
25
25
. 51
42 .
230
42
170
62
10
10
17
28
28
63
42
1.5
10
70
42
17
70
70
12
12
21
850
34
10
12
12
14
34
46
63
10
14
150
52
10
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
UJ
NJ
U
u
UJ
u
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
UJ
u
u
u
u
UJ
UJ
UJ
u
u
UJ
u
u
8.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)*
952401 07-S1
70.6
67.8
74.7
65.3
61.7
67.8
64.8
112.0
73.5
39.5
98.3
95.4
104.1
65.3
90.2
73.8
24.2
81.6
128.2
77.5
51.3
110.2
79.1
70.4
117.9
153.7
71.6
76.8
61.5
104.3
64.6
56.9
88.5
8.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)1
952401 07-S2
74.6
74.4
79.5
61.1
65.6
71.7
67.7
179.0
62.8
38.2
88.1
79.7
90.2
53.9
88.3
87.0
17.0
67.1
118.1
70.2
60.7
111.6
95.0
71.5
106.4
137.9
73.5
82.3
70.0
93.5
42.7
53.2
68.2
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-20, Page: Iof3
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endosulfan 1
Endrin Ketone
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
EPN
Ethalfluralln (Sonalan)
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenithrothion
Fensulfothion
Fenthion
Fluridone
Fonophos
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Imidan
loxynil
Lindane
Malathion E50
MCPA
MCPP
Merphos
Metholachlor
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Napropamide
Norflurazon
Oxyfluorfen
P.P'-DDT
P.P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
Parathion-methyl
Parathion
Pendimethalin
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachl
Phenol, 2,3,4,5-tetrachl
Phorate
Picloram
Prometryne
Pronamide (kerb)
Ramrod
Ronnel
Units
us/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
us/kg
Ma/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
up/kg
CAS#
33213659
1031078
959988
53494705
72208
7421934
2104645
55283686
563122
13194484
122145
115902
55389
59756604
944229
1024573
76448
732116
1689834
58899
121755
94746
93652
150505
51218452
72435
21087649
15299997
27314132
42874033
50293
72548
72559
298000
56382
40487421
87865
58902
4901513
298022
1918021
7287196
23950585
1918167
299843
8
Field
Sample
10
10
10
10
10
10
17
26
12
14
12
17
12
100
10
10
10
19
42
10
14
85
85
28
70
10
17
52
35
70
10
3
10
12
14
26
20
23
23
12
42
17
70
42
12
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
NJ
U
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
8.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
113.6
101.2
115.7
54.0
112.2
70.5
91.8
123.2
137.6
127.0
81.3
113.3
50.2
116.5
39.7
96.5
83.5
88.8
79.0
26.0
71.3
111.6
99.2
24.4
150.4
129.3
111.8
145.9
72.8
73.2
66.2
67.5
133.3
56.0
53.2
4.7
100.1
111.6
8.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(IVISD)'
101.6
93.3
101.8
56.6
99.6
57.0
90.5
109.2
127.1
99.8
65.2
105.3
48.4
110.9
49.0
90.1
88.1
91.5
76.4
26.2
55.7
95.8
90.4
25.5
132.9
111.6
108.5
137.9
61.8
82.6
73.8
75.2
99.5
55.4
38.8
20.9
86.6
107.3
Revision 3.0, January 17,1997
Appendix E, Table E-20, Page: 2 of 3
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
STATION NUMBER
Target Compound
Silvex
Simazine
Sulfotep
Sulprofos
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
Toxaphene
Trichlopyr
Trifluraline
Units
ps/ks
us/kg
ua/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
pg/kg
MS/kg
CAS#
93721
122349
3689245
35400432
34014181
5902512
8001352
55335063
1582098
8
Field
Sample
34
17
10
12
26
52
350
34
26
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
8.0
Matrix
Spike
(MS)1
Fgo.s
119.2
131.5
79.5
104.6
70.4
81.0
8.0
Matrix
Spike
Duplicate
(MSD)*
91.2
95.9
102.8
62.6
102.7
75.6
79.2
1 Measurement values reported in this column are units of percent recovery of target compound spiked in matrix sample.
Revision 3.0, January] 7, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-20, Page: 3 of 3
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-21. Blind Duplicate Inorganic Measurements in Drinking Water Samples
STATION
LOCATION
EPA NUMBER
SOURCE
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silica
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
CAS
NUMBER
7429905
7440360
7440382
7440393
7440417
7440428
7440439
7440702
7440473
7440484
7440508
7439896
7439921
7439954
7439965
7439976
7439987
7440020
7440097
7782492
7631869
7440224
7440235
7440280
7440622
7440666
METHOD
— —
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
CVAA
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/SAS
ICP/MS
ICP/SAS .
ICP/SAS
200.7
200.8
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
200.7
200.8
200.7
200.7
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430516
outdoor tap
M9/I
20
0.5
5.3
2
0.5
16
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5590
1.1
0.2
5
10
1900
2
25200
3
9800
1
8.3
7.7
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P
35
Reservation
Dexter
95430517
Lab Duplicate
outdoor tap
U9/f
20
0.5
5.28
2
0.5
17
2
16100
5
10
1.3
10
0.5
5560
1
0.2
5
10
2000
2
25100
3
9740
1
8
9.6
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P
P
AVERAGE PERCENT DIFFERENCE FOR METALS MEASUREMENTS
UNITS
Alkalinity .
Chloride
Fluoride
Ammonia, N
Nitrate+Nitrite.N
Tot Phosphorus
Sulfate
Temperature
pH, field
Conductivity
Titrimetry
Ion Chrom.
Ion Chrom.
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Colorimetry
Ion Chrom.
Electrometry
Electrometry
Electrometry
310.1
300.0
300.0
350.1
353.2
365.1
300.0
mg/i
73.1
11.6
0.192
0.2
0.036
0.244
5.06
13.2
8.69
169
HJN
m0/l
60
11.6
0.193
0.16
0.04
0.208
5.07
13.2
8.69
169
HJN
Precision
—
Percent
Difference
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
6.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.1
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.6
0.0
3.7
22.0
±2%
Percent
Difference
19.7
0.0
0.5
22.2
10.5
15.9
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Table E-21, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-22. Laboratory Duplicate Inorganics Measurements of Dump Site Samples
Station
Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
2
Dump Site,
Leachate
95080026
Water
2
Dump Site,
Leachate,
Lab Dupl.
95080026
Water
Precision
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
95080024
Water
Metals Measurements
Units
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Zinc
Mflfl
36.9
1
195
0.3
0.52
101000
1
2
8010
1.93
12700
141
0.1
13
8950
25800
237
BN
U
U
P
U
P
B
U
M9/t
Percent
Difference
M9/I
335
1
17.1
0.3
0.3
8030
1
1.6
569
1.12
3
27.4
0.1
1.61
1400
16800
59.5
N
U
B
U
U
U
P
B
U
P
4
FW Stream,
Below Dump Site
Lab Dupl.
95080024
Water
Precision
Wtf
296
1.0
17.0
0.3
0.3
8040
1
1.5
524
1.93
3220
27.5
1.58
1
17000
57.4
N
U
B
U
U
U
P
B
U
P
Average Percent Difference
Percent -
Difference
12
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
8
53
1
0
2-
15
1
4
±7
General Chemistry Measurements:
Unite
Alkalinity
Ammonia
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrate+Nitrite
Sulfate
mg/l
263
0.052
41.9
0.067
1.22
51.4
J
mg/l
263
0.087
39.5
0.067
1.23
51.4
J
Percent
hlffAtWIfifi *
0
50
6
0
1
0
mg/l
18.8
0.02
27.7
0.05
1.15
11.6
UJ
U
mg/l
18.9
Percent
niffAfftrtftA
1
•
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-22, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E-23. Laboratory Duplicate Inorganics Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
Station
Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
6
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
95240100
95240101
Sediment
6
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
95240100
95240101
Lab Duplicate
Sediment
Precision
7
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
Water
7
Upper Cranberry
Ditch
95240103
95240105
95240104
95240102
Lab Duplicate '
Water
Precision
Metals Measurements
Units
Aluminum .
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
tng/kg
6050
10
14.4
0.229
1660
11.2
3.94
5.25
20300
3.7
3090
130
8.57
358
10
0.44
132
27.4
35.3
u
p
p
p
mg/kg
5970
24
15.1
0.252
1500
11.6
4.03
5.41
20400
1.0
3120
131
9.02
350
3.2
0.12
132
26.5
35.5
P
u
u
u
Average Percent Difference
Percent
Difference
1
5
10
10
4
2
3
0
1
1
5
2
0
3
1
±3
jjg/l
67
6.42
3.4
0.3
7270
1
10
3
4710
0.5
5510
104
0.3
3610
2
0.1
24600
3.3
7
P
N
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UNE
P
PB
Mg/l
66
6.35
3.3
0.3
7370
1
10
3
4730
0.5
5550
105
0.3
3200
2
0.1
24700
3.0
9.6
P
N
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
UNE
P
PB
Average Percent Difference
Percent
Difference
2
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
12
0
0
0
10
31
±3
General Chemistry Measurements:
Station
Number
Units
Alkalinity
Chloride
Fluoride
Kjel-Nitrogen
Ammonia
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total
Phosphorus
Sulfate
6
:mg/l
6
mg/l
Precision
Percent
Difference
9
rng/l
54.3
269
0.106
0.371
0.074
0.085
0.245
40.1
J
9
mg/t
53.7
0.339
0.073
0.167
0.298
J
Precision
Percent
Difference
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, Table E-23, Page: lofl
-------
The Shoahvater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table E- 24. Laboratory Duplicate Metals Measurements of Cranberry Bog Samples
Station Number
Location
EPA Sample
Number
Media
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
Sediment
95080020
23
Grays Harbor,
South Bay
Sediment
95080020
Precision
Metals Measurements
IM&
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
mg/fc0
15100
14.4
23.3
0.808
3850
30.4
28.4
36100
13.7
7380
145
19.6
2680
13300
mg/kg
14000
14.2
22.8
0.771
3730
29.4
28.2
35100
13.0
7220
141
18.9
2630
13200
Average Percent Difference
Percent
Difference
8
1
2
5
3
3
1
3
5
2
3
4
2
1
3
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix E, TableE-24, Page: 1 of 1
-------
Appendix F: DATA QUALIFIERS USED TO VALIDATE ORGANICS
DATA
The following qualifiers were used for organics measurement data attached to this Report:
U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the sample quantitation
limit. The associated numerical value is based upon the lowest calibration point of
the 5-point initial calibration curve and any dilutions which were made to the
sample due to high concentrations or matrix effects.
If a decision requires quantitation of the analyte below the associated numerical
level, reanalysis or alternative analytical methods should be considered. The
technical staff is available to discuss available options.
J - The analyte was analyzed for and was positively identified, but the associated
numerical value may not be consistent with the amount actually present in the
environmental sample. The data should be seriously considered for decision
making and are useable for many purposes.
A subscript may be appended to the "J" that indicates which of the following
quality control criteria were not met:
1 Blank Contamination: indicates possible high bias and/or false positives.
2 Calibration range exceeded: indicates possible low bias.
3 Holding times not met: indicates low bias for most analytes with the
exception of common laboratory contaminants and chlorinated ethenes (i.e.
trichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethene, vinyl chloride).
4 Other QC outside control limits: bias not readily determined.
R - The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the
sample and meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte
cannot be verified.
Resampling and reanalysis are necessary to confirm or deny the presence of
the analyte.
UJ - The analyte was analyzed for and was not detected above the reported quantitation
limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is approximate and may or may not
represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely
measure the analyte in this sample.
If a decision requires quantitation of the analyte close to the associated numerical
level, reanalysis or alternative analytical methods should be considered.
-------
The Shoahvater Bay Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
N - The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive
evidence to make a tentative identification.
Confirmation of the analyte requires forther analysis:
NJ - A combination of the "N" and the "J" qualifier. The analysis indicates the presence of
an analyte that has been "tentatively identified" and the associated numerical value
represents its approximate concentration.
A subscript may be appended to the "NJ" that indicates which of the following
situations applies:
1 DDT/Endrin breakdown evident.
2 Interference from other sample components.
3 Non-Target Compound List (TCL) organic compounds (Confirmation is
necessary using specific target compound methodology to accurately
determine the concentration and identity of the detected compounds.)
4 A confirmation analysis was missing or quality control criteria were not
met for the confirmation analysis.
NAF - Not analyzed for.
NAR - No analytical result.
* - The analyte was present in the sample. This is a visual aid to locate detected
compounds on the report sheet.
-------
Appendix G: DATA QUALIFIERS USED TO VALIDATE
INORGANICS DATA
The following qualifiers were used for inorganics measurement data attached to this
Report:
U - Element was analyzed but not detected. The associated numerical value is the
method detection limit, as defined in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B.
P - The analyte was detected above the Instrument Detection Limit, but not quantified
within the expected limits of precision. The laboratory has established minimum
quantitation limits having a relative standard deviation of no more than 10%.
H - The samples were analyzed after the suggested holding time limit.
E - The reported value is an estimate because of the presence of an interference. An
explanatory note is provide in the data validation report.
B - Analyte is found in the analytical blank as well as the sample indicating
possible/probable blank contamination. If analytes are found in any of the
associated procedural blanks the concentration in the samples must be at least ten
times the quantity observed in the blank. If the sample result fails these criteria the
sample result is qualified (B).
N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
NAR - There is no analysis result for this sample.
S - Sample was analyzed by method of standard additions.
+ - Sample was analyzed by method of standard additions and the correlation coefficient
was less than 0.995.
* - The analyte was present in the sample.
W - Post spike out of specified range, and sample was less than 50% the spike added.
-------
Appendix H: GPS READINGS FOR PROJECT SAMPLES
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Table H-1. GPS coordinates for stations 1 to 14 and 20 to 23, and for the drinking water survey.
Station No,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12and12A
13
14
20
21
22
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
28
31
32
33
34
Media
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Razor Clams
Oysters
Littleneck Clams
Sediment
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water.
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinkina Water
Utitude-North
46° 43' 42.087"
46° 43' 42.087"
46° 43' 40.009"
46° 43' 40.009"
46° 43' 37.005"
46° 44' 13.639"
46° 44' 13.639"
46° 43' 57.289"
46° 43' 57.289"
46° 40' 54.8"
46° 40' 51.4"
46° 43' 20.365"
46° 43' 28.0"
46° 41' 30.9"
46° 42' 50.885"
46° 43' 13.077"
46° 43' 08.212"
46° 51' 32.826"
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
46° 43' 21.712"
46° 43' 22.815"
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
46° 43' 25.965"
N/A
N/A
N/A
46° 43' 41.721"
46° 43' 42.380"
N/A
46° 43' 41.867"
N/A
N/A
46° 47' 44.491"
Longitude-West
124° 03' 03.991"
124° 03' 03:991"
124° 03' 03.082"
124° 03' 03.082"
124° 03' 02.421"
124° 04' 07.103"
124° 04' 07.103"
124° 03' 40.835"
124° 03' 40.835"
123° 55' 51.5"
123° 55' 42.0"
124° 01' 05.866"
123° 56' 20.8"
123° 57' 48.8"
124° 01' 49.353"
123° 57' 56.809"
124° 01' 09.727"
124° 05' 06.766"
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
124° 00' 59.674"
124° 01' 05.811"
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
124° 01' 09.657"
N/A
N/A
N/A
124° 02' 02.562"
124° 01' 58.226"
N/A
124° 02' 07.085"
N/A
N/A
124° 05' 25.451"
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix H, Table H-1, Page: Iof2
-------
The Shoalwater Reservation: A Limited Environmental Assessment, 1994 - 1995
Station No.
35
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Media
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Latitude-North
46° 43' 16.137"
46° 43' 16.137"
46° 43' 16.521"
46° 43' 18.124"
46° 43' 35.535"
N/A
46° 51' 53.713"
46° 53' 55.195"
46° 53' 19.851"
46° 40' 05.141"
46° 36' 03.008"
46° 43' 24.958"
46° 52' 55.620"
46° 43' 32.009"
46° 43' 03.351"
46° 42' 19.697"
46° 43' 34.025"
Longitude-West
124° 00' 58.821"
124° 00' 58.821"
124° 00' 57.110"
124° 00' 58.636"
124° 00' 47.597"
N/A
123° 56' 34.278"
124° 01' 55.660"
124° 01' 37.568"
123° 49' 07.520"
123° 56' 32.603"
124° 01' 01 .645"
124° 06' 22.117"
124° 01' 23.562"
124° 00' 45.773"
123° 58' 10.568"
124° 00' 45.174"
Revision 3.0, January 17, 1997
Appendix H, Table H-l, Page: 2 of 2
•ft U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1997-591-583
------- |