EPA 600/R-14/103 I May 2015 I www.epa.gov/hfstudy
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Retrospective Case Study in
Killdeer, North Dakota
STUDY OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING ON DRINKING
WATER RESOURCES
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
-------
(This page intentionally left blank.)
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing
on Drinking Water Resources
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC
May 2015
EPA/600/R-14/103
in
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Disclaimer
This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
IV
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table of Contents
Disclaimer iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
List of Figures viii
Acronyms and Abbreviations x
Preface xiv
Authors xv
Acknowledgements xvi
Executive Summary 1
1. Introduction 5
2. Purpose and Scope 10
3. Study Area Background 11
3.1. Geology 11
3.2. Hydrology 16
3.3. Oil and Gas Production 18
3.4. Land Use 19
3.5. Other Contaminant Sources 22
4. Study Methods 24
4.1. Sampling Locations 25
4.2. Water Collection 28
4.2.1. Purging and Sampling at Domestic and Municipal Wells 28
4.2.2. Purging and Sampling at Supply Wells 28
4.2.3. Purging and Sampling at Monitoring Wells 29
4.2.4. Purging and Sampling at the North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) Wells 29
4.2.5. Sample Handling 29
4.3. Water Analysis 29
4.3.1. Field Parameters 29
4.3.2. Analytical Methods for Ground Water 30
4.4. QA/QC 32
4.5. Data Handling and Analysis 32
5. Historic Water Quality 35
5.1. National Water Information Systems (NWIS) Database 35
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
5.2. North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) Database 35
5.3. Klausing Data 35
5.4. National Uranium Resources Evaluation (NURE) Database 35
5.5. Produced Water Database 35
5.6. Limitations to the Determination of Background Using Historical Data 35
6. State-Commissioned Monitoring Data at the Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Location 37
7. Water Quality Results from this Study 38
7.1. Initial Study Data Screening 38
7.2. Comparisons with Historical Data 38
7.3. Other Parameters 45
7.3.1. Dissolved Gases 45
7.3.2. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 45
7.3.3. Glycols 46
7.3.4. Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) 46
7.3.5. Diesel Range Organic Compounds/ Gasoline Range Organic Compounds (DRO/GRO) 47
7.4. Summary of Water Quality Results 47
8. Specific Focus Topics-NDGW07 and NDGW08 48
8.1. Hydrology Results from this Study 48
8.2. Brine as a Potential Source of Contamination 48
8.3. Time Trends 53
8.4. Source of the Brine 62
8.4.1. Out-of-Zone Fracturing 62
8.4.2. Source Delineation 62
8.5. Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) 79
8.6. Sulfate 80
9. Summary of Case Study Results 82
References 88
Appendix A QA/QC Summary A-l
Appendix B Sample Results B-l
Appendix C Background Data C-l
Appendix D Supporting Information D-l
VI
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
List of Tables
Table 1. Hydraulic fracturing chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing of the Franchuk 44-20
SWHwell 8
Table 2. Soil types and selected properties 14
Table 3. Land use in Dunn County in 1992 and 2006 20
Table 4. Test methods used to analyze ground water samples 24
Table 5. Sampling Locations 26
Table 6. Data comparisons and statistical summaries for study data (excluding NDGW07 and
NDGW08)and historical data within a 3-mile radius of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well 43
Table 7. Results of Q-test to determine if a parameter is an outlier for NDGW06 45
Table 8. Potentiometric surface elevations relative to survey datum (ft) 48
Table 9. Potential ground water impacts in the Killdeer retrospective case study 83
VI1
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
List of Figures
Figure 1. Killdeer retrospective case study location 7
Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for Dunn County, North Dakota 12
Figure 3. Map of the soil types in the vicinity of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well pad 13
Figure 4. A map showing the Killdeer aquifer, Dunn County, North Dakota 17
Figure 5. Generalized cross section of the Killdeer aquifer along the line A to A' in Figure 4 18
Figure 6. Oil and gas production in North Dakota from 1998 through 2012 19
Figure 7. Land use in Dunn County, North Dakota, in 1992 and 2006 21
Figure 8. Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Locations 27
Figure 9. Plots showing data ranges for the Killdeer retrospective case study wells 39
Figure 10. Piper diagram showing all the study data collected at the Killdeer retrospective case
study 40
Figure 11. Statistical plots comparing study data (excluding NDGW07 and NDGW08) with
historical data within a 3-mile radius of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well 41
Figure 12. Relative potentiometric surface maps based on relative Top-of-Casing (TOC) survey of
site wells 49
Figure 13. Brine differentiation plot showing how the different hydrocarbon-producing brines
formation in Dunn County, North Dakota plot compared with the region predicted by
Hounslow(1995) 50
Figure 14. Brine differentiation plot showing the study data collected by EPA as part of this study
and the state-commissioned data 51
Figure 15. Plot of total dissolved solids (IDS) versus chloride/Zanions for the Killdeer
retrospective case study 52
Figure 16. Plots of log chloride or sodium/chloride versus log cation 54
Figure 17. Plots of log specific conductivity (SpC) versus log parameter 55
Figure 18. Log chloride concentrations versus log iodide concentrations showing study data and
formation brine waters in which hydrocarbon production occurred in Dunn County 56
Figure 19. Log sodium concentrations versus log Na/Li showing study data and formation water
brines in which hydrocarbon production occurred in Dunn County 57
Figure 20. Time trend data for chloride study data and data provided by the state 59
Figure 21. Time trend data for tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) 60
Vlll
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Figure 22. Plots used to predict the concentrations of chloride in NDGW08 after the October
2012 sampling round 61
Figure 23. Detailed stratigraphy of the Paleozoic strata in the Williston Basin in North Dakota 63
Figure 24. Plots of log chloride or sodium/chloride versus log cation and showing 1:1 trends
between unimpacted wells and brine formation water 64
Figure 25. Plot of log chloride versus log CI/Br for the unimpacted study wells NDGW07 and
NDGW08 brine formation waters of oil and gas produced formations in Dunn County,
North Dakota 66
Figure 26. Plot of log chloride versus log CI/Br showing mixing percentages 67
Figure 27. Plot of log sodium versus log Na/Li for study data and brine formation waters 68
Figure 28. Plot of log sodium versus log Na/Li showing mixing percentages 69
Figure 29. Plot of log chloride versus log Cl/l for study data and brine formation waters 71
Figure 30. Plot of log chloride versus log Cl/l for study data and (A) Bakken formation water and
(B) Madison formation waters 72
Figure 31. Strontium isotope plot at the Killdeer retrospective case study 73
Figure 32. Strontium isotopic ratio and concentration time trends 74
Figure 33. Strontium isotope mixing curves 75
Figure 34. Strontium isotope mixing curves for the Bakken formation and the Madison formation
(Ratcliffe member) without mixing values 77
Figure 35. Water isotope plots of 618O versus 62H 78
Figure 36. Plot showing the relationship of sulfate concentrations collected in this study to the
saturation index of gypsum 81
IX
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADQ audit of data quality
ANOVA analysis of variance
bbl barrels
bgs below ground surface
CI/Br chloride to bromide ratio
Cl/l chloride to iodide ratio
DIG dissolved inorganic carbon
DO dissolved oxygen
DOC dissolved organic carbon
DRO diesel-range organics
EDO electronic data deliverable
EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
EIA United States Energy Information Administration
ESI+ positive electrospray ionization
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
Franchuk well Franchuk SWH 44-20 well
ft feet
ft/day feet per day
ft2/day square feet per day
GC-MS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
g/min gallons per minute
GMWL Global Meteoric Water Line
GPC Groundwater Protection Council
GRO gasoline-range organics
HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
ICP-OES inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy
ICP-MS inductively couple plasma-mass spectrometry
IRMS isotope-ratio mass spectrometry
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
K hydraulic conductivity
L liter
L/min liters per minute
LMWL Local Meteoric Water Line
m meter
m/yr meters per year
MCF thousand cubic feet
MCFPD thousand cubic feet per day
MCL maximum contaminant level
MDL minimum detection limit
mg/L milligrams per liter
mi2 square miles
mL milliliters
mL/min milliliters per minute
MS mass spectrometry
MS/MS tandem mass spectrometry
u.g/L micrograms per liter
u.m micrometer
u.S/cm microsiemens per centimeter
mg/L milligrams per liter
Na/Li sodium to lithium ratio
NLCD National Land Cover Database
NDDWQ North Dakota Department of Health, Division of Water Quality
NDIC North Dakota Industrial Commission
NDWC North Dakota Water Commission
NERL National Exposure Research Lab
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
NLCD National Land Cover Database
NPL National Priority List
XI
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
NRMRL National Risk Management Laboratory
NIL) nephelometric turbidity units
NURE National Uranium Resources Evaluation
NWIS National Water Information System
ORD Office of Research and Development
ORP oxidation-reduction potential
PVC polyvinyl chloride
QA quality assurance
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
QC quality control
QL quantitation limit
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RSKERL Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
RSKSOP Robert S Kerr Environmental Research Center Standard Operating Procedure
SMCL secondary maximum contaminant level
SOP standard operating procedure
SpC specific conductivity
STORE! STOrage and RETrieval
87Sr/86Sr strontium-87 to strontium-86 ratio
SVOC semi-volatile organic compounds
TBA tert-butyl alcohol
IDS total dissolved solids
TIC tentatively identified compound
TIMS thermal imagery mass spectrometry
TOC top of casing
TPS total petroleum system
TSA technical system audit
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
xn
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
UST underground storage tank
VOC volatile organic compound
Xlll
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Preface
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conducting a study of the potential impacts of
hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on drinking water resources. This study was initiated in Fiscal Year
2010 when Congress urged the EPA to examine the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and
drinking water resources in the United States. In response, EPA developed a research plan (Plan to
Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources) that was reviewed by
the Agency's Science Advisory Board (SAB) and issued in 2011. A progress report on the study (Study of
the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources: Progress Report), detailing
the EPA's research approaches and next steps, was released in late 2012 and was followed by a
consultation with individual experts convened under the auspices of the SAB.
The EPA's study includes the development of several research projects, extensive review of the
literature and technical input from state, industry, and non-governmental organizations as well as the
public and other stakeholders. A series of technical roundtables and in-depth technical workshops were
held to help address specific research questions and to inform the work of the study. The study is
designed to address research questions posed for each stage of the hydraulic fracturing water cycle:
Water Acquisition: What are the possible impacts of large volume water withdrawals
from ground and surface waters on drinking water resources?
Chemical Mixing: What are the possible impacts of surface spills of hydraulic fracturing fluid
on or near well pads on drinking water resources?
Well Injection: What are the possible impacts of the injection and fracturing process on
drinking water resources?
Flowback and Produced Water: What are the possible impacts of surface spills of flowback
and produced water on or near well pads on drinking water resources?
Wastewater Treatment and Waste Disposal: What are the possible impacts of inadequate
treatment of hydraulic fracturing wastewaters on drinking water resources?
This report, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota, is the product of one of the research
projects conducted as part of the EPA's study. It has undergone independent, external peer review in
accordance with Agency policy and all of the peer review comments received were considered in the
report's development.
The EPA's study will contribute to the understanding of the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing
activities for oil and gas on drinking water resources and the factors that may influence those impacts.
The study will help facilitate and inform dialogue among interested stakeholders, including Congress,
other Federal agencies, states, tribal government, the international community, industry, non-
governmental organizations, academia, and the general public.
xiv
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Authors
Douglas G. Beak, US EPA/ORD/NRMRL
Gregory G. Oberley, US EPA/Region 8
Christopher J. Ruybal, Student Services Contractor for US EPA under contract EP-13-C-000135
Steven D. Acree, US EPA/ORD/NRMRL
Randall R. Ross, US EPA/ORD/NRMRL
xv
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Acknowledgements
EPA would like to acknowledge the homeowners who participated in this study. EPA would also like to
acknowledge the following organizations for their efforts in providing field and sampling support, site
data and/or background information, and site access: North Dakota Department of Health, Division of
Water Quality and the North Dakota Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and
Gas Division, USGS, Denbury Resources, and Terracon. For their efforts in providing analytical support,
EPA acknowledges the following organizations: Shaw Environmental (subsequently CB&I) for metals,
VOC, dissolved gas, organic acid, and water isotope analyses; EPA Region 3 for glycol analyses; EPA
Region 7 for coordinating the analytical contract for VOCs and metals for the third round of sampling
conducted in the study; EPA Region 8 for SVOC, DRO, and GRO analyses; and EPA Office of Research and
Development's general parameters laboratory for DIG, DOC, anion, and nutrient analyses. Finally, EPA
acknowledges the five technical reviewers, who provided constructive comments to improve the report;
peer review was coordinated by Eastern Research Group, Inc. (contract EP-C-12-021).
xvi
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Executive Summary
In December 2009, Congress urged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conduct a study
to better understand the relationship between hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on drinking water
resources. This report provides the results of one of five retrospective case studies conducted as a
component of EPA's national study on potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water
resources (US EPA, 2011a, 2011b). Retrospective case studies focused on investigating reported
instances of drinking water contamination in areas where hydraulic fracturing has already occurred.
This report describes the retrospective case study in Dunn County, North Dakota, conducted near
Killdeer, North Dakota. The Killdeer study area is the location of historical oil and gas production, with
current unconventional oil and gas production occurring in the late Devonian/early Mississippian-aged
Bakken Shale. A known blowout occurred at this site, the Franchuk 44-20 SHW well (Franchuk well)
during the hydraulic fracturing process to complete the well. The blowout occurred during the fifth
stage of a 23-stage hydraulic fracture. This resulted in a release of hydraulic fracturing fluids, oil, and
flowback water onto the land surface and possibly into the Killdeer aquifer. The release occurred when
an inner string of casing burst due to over-pressurization during the hydraulic fracturing process (Jacob,
2011).
Water quality samples were collected from three domestic wells, nine monitoring wells, two supply
wells, one municipal well, and one state well during three rounds in July 2011, October 2011, and
October 2012. All wells at the Killdeer site, except NDGW09, were screened in the Killdeer aquifer.
Regarding the exception, information provided to EPA suggested that this deep monitoring well was
screened in the Killdeer aquifer; however, the presence of lignite in the well log suggests that it may also
be screened, all or partially, in the underlying Sentinel Butte aquifer.
The geochemistry of water samples was investigated by analyzing major ions, trace metals,
methane/ethane gas concentrations, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs), glycol ethers, diesel- and gasoline-range organics (DRO and GRO), low-molecular-
weight acids, and selected stable isotopes (618OH20, 62HH20, and 87Sr/86Sr). Major ion data collected from
this study were compared with historical water quality data retrieved from the literature and national
water quality databases, including the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information
System (NWIS; USGS, 2013), North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) databases (NDWC, 2013),
and the report Ground Water Basic Data for Dunn Co., North Dakota (Klausing 1976). These data
sources provided water quality data for samples collected prior to major development of the Bakken
Shale play and provided an initial screening for potential ground water contamination. Statistical
comparisons (analysis of variance [ANOVA] and Kruskal-Wallis tests) were made between the data
collected from this study and the historical data. In order to help determine whether hydraulic
fracturing or processes related to hydraulic fracturing were the cause or one of the causes of alleged
impacts on water quality, other potential contaminant sources were identified by conducting detailed
environmental record searches.
The initial examination of major anions and cations indicated that two of the study wells, NDGW07 and
NDGW08, showed statistically significant differences in parameters such as chloride, calcium,
magnesium, sodium, and strontium, compared to other study wells. No other study wells showed
differences in chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and strontium, with the exception of NDGW06 in
the October 2012 sampling round when compared to the other study wells. In the October 2012
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
sampling round, the chloride concentration in the NDGW06 sample was elevated, however it was
determined that the chloride concentration in the October 2012 NDGW06 sample was an outlier. All
other parameters for the October 2012 NDGW06 sample were not outliers based on the Dixon Q-test
performed (Dean and Dixon, 1951). Using the data collected during this study, it cannot be determined
whether the October 2012 NDGW06 chloride concentration was an anomalous data point or an
indication of an additional impacted well.
All study wells with the exceptions of NDGW07, NDGW08, and NDGW09 (NDGW09 was screened partly
or completely in the Sentinel Butte Aquifer) were compared with the historical data from the NWIS,
NDWC, and Klausing (1976) data sources for the Killdeer aquifer. NDGW09 was not used in this
comparison because well logs indicated that it was at least partially screened in the Sentinel Butte
aquifer and, therefore, would not be comparable to the Killdeer aquifer. NDGW07 and NDGW08 were
not compared with historical data because the initial data screening indicated that these wells had
different water quality than the other study wells in the study. The comparison to historical data was
performed on historical data within a 3-mile radius of the Franchuk well to ensure that the comparison
was reflective of the local Killdeer aquifer chemistry. The comparison of these study wells with the
historical data showed that there were no statistical differences and that these study wells were
unimpacted, even with inclusion of the October 2012 NDGW06 sample.
Dissolved gases were compared with the results of a report by the state of North Dakota (Anderson et
al., 2010) for field screening for shallow gas. Methane was detected in 24% of the total samples, with a
maximum concentration of 0.0253 mg/L These observed concentrations were consistent with
background methane concentrations of 0.0149 to 0.3978 mg/L. There were no observed impacts on
drinking water quality from methane.
There were limited detections of other organic compounds in the study wells during the study. Thirty-
eight VOCs were analyzed for during the study, and at least one was detected in 15% of the samples.
The VOCs detected were acetone, toluene, m+p-xylene, o-xylene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and 1,2,3-
trimethylbenzene (2% of the detections); benzene (7% of the detections); and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)
(15% of the detections). Glycols were not detected in the study wells during the study. The detection
frequency for low-molecular-weight acids was 8%, and the detections were for formate (10% of
detections) and acetate (31% of detections). Finally, 84 SVOCs were analyzed for during the study, and
at least one was detected in 17% of the samples. The SVOCs detected during the study were 2-
butoxyethanol, dimethyl phthalate (2% of the detections), bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (17% of the
detections), and bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (34% of the detections). In most cases, with the exception of
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), the detected organic compounds reasonably could be related back to sources
that were not related to the Franchuk well blowout. These sources included vehicular traffic, generators
used to power well pumps, flaring of methane from the pad's production wells, and polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) cement that was used to repair NDGW10 the day prior to sampling.
TBA was consistently detected in NDGW07 and NDGW08 but was not detected in any of the other study
wells. No historical data were found for TBA in the historical literature, so comparisons with the results
from this study could not be made. Based on the analysis of other potential sources of contamination, it
was determined that the only potential sources of TBA were from gasoline spills, leaking underground
storage tanks (USTs), and hydraulic fracturing fluids. If derived from these sources, the TBA would have
to be a degradation product of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) (from gasoline) or tert-butyl
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
hydroperoxide (from hydraulic fracturing fluid). However, MTBE or other compounds expected to be
associated with MTBE were not detected, and the remaining possible origin of TBA would be the tert-
butyl hydroperoxide used in the hydraulic fracturing of the Franchuk well. Based on the data in this
study, the TBA observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08 was consistent with the blowout of the Franchuk
well being the source of the TBA.
An initial hydrological investigation was conducted at the Killdeer case study site. The investigation
identified potentially significant temporal fluctuations in the hydraulic gradient beneath the pad.
However, there was always a southerly component to the ground water flow. The southerly component
of the flow is important, because it eliminates one potential source, road salt, for the observed changes
in water quality (elevated chloride concentrations) to NDGW07 and NDGW08. The potential source,
road salt, was applied to the highway adjacent to the southern edge of the study site. For this to be a
source of contamination, the ground water flow would have to have a northerly component, which was
never observed.
The time trends for various parameters in the study wells were also analyzed. The concentrations of
various inorganic parameters did not vary over time in the unimpacted wells. However, in NDGW07 and
NDGW08, the trends for inorganic parameters and for TBA were consistent with contaminant transport
through these wells. Furthermore, the time trend analysis was consistent with the blowout at the
Franchuk well being the potential source of contamination, particularly because NDGW07 and NDGW08
were downgradient of the Franchuk well.
The analysis of data from NDGW07 and NDGW08 indicates that the main impact on water quality was
from briny water and TBA mixing with Killdeer aquifer water in these wells. In all cases, the
fingerprinting techniques used confirmed that the impacts on NDGW07 and NDGW08 were likely from
deep formation brines underlying the Killdeer study location. Based on the available deep formation
brine data and the use of sodium to lithium (Na/Li) ratios, chloride to iodide (Cl/l) ratios, and isotopic
analysis, it was determined that the brine had a Madison Formation-like signature and analysis to
determine the potential source of the observed impacts was undertaken. Other sources of impacts on
drinking water quality, such as nearby oil and gas activities, land use practices, leaking USTs, and
industrial activities, are unlikely. This is because of the lack of detections of organic compounds and the
lack of any signature of any source of contamination in the other monitoring wells at this pad. Based on
the data in this study, the briny water observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08 was consistent with the
blowout of the Franchuk well being the source of the brine.
However, analysis of the data indicated that brine characteristic of the Madison formation rather than
the Bakken formation was the source of the impact. Additional literature review indicates that out-of-
zone fracturing, or propagation of fractures outside the production zone into adjacent formations, is a
common problem in Bakken formation wells. This literature indicates that in a high percentage of
Bakken wells that have out-of-zone fracturing also have Madison formation brine signatures. The
finding of a Madison formation brine source of impact on NDGW07 and NDGW08 is consistent with
what was reported in the literature.
The results for several study samples, as well as the historical data, indicated that sulfate exceeded the
secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) overtime. Analysis of the sulfate data and information
on the geology of Dunn County indicate that the sulfate concentration in the Killdeer aquifer is from
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
naturally occurring sources such as gypsum and selenite in the soils. It is unlikely that any impacts from
anthropogenic activities would cause the high sulfate concentrations observed in the Killdeer aquifer.
Based on the data analysis performed for the Killdeer case study, the observed impacts on NDGW07 and
NDGW08 are consistent with the blowout that occurred at the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well being the
source of the impact.
Key observations or findings from this study are listed below.
With the exception of TBA (detected in two wells), all VOC compounds (detected in three wells)
and SVOC compounds (detected in five wells) could be related to a potential source other than
hydraulic fracturing. No glycols were detected in the study wells during the study.
Methane was detected in 24% of the study samples, with a maximum observed concentration of
0.0253 mg/L Methane concentrations observed during the study are consistent with
background methane concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer (0.0149 to 0.3978 mg/L).
For sulfate, 38% of the study samples exceeded the secondary maximum contaminant level
(SMCL). The sulfate concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer are consistent with naturally occurring
sources such as gypsum and selenite in the soils of Dunn County and are consistent with the
historical data.
With the exception of three wells (two impacted wells and a well screened or partially screened
in another aquifer), the results from the study wells were not significantly different than the
historical data from the Killdeer aquifer and were considered unimpacted wells.
The study identified two impacted monitoring wells that had water quality different from the
other study wells and historical data.
TBA was consistently detected in the two impacted monitoring wells, but not in the unimpacted
wells. TBA concentrations were consistent with the degradation of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, a
component used in the hydraulic fracturing fluid at the time of the blowout.
The only potential source consistent with the conditions observed in the two impacted wells is
the blow out that occurred at the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well.
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
1. Introduction
Recent advances in drilling technologies (horizontal drilling) and well stimulation (hydraulic fracturing)
have resulted in large-scale development of vast, unconventional reserves of oil and gas across a wide
range of geographic regions and geologic formations in the United States. These reserves are
considered unconventional because they are bound up in low-permeability reservoirs such as shale,
tight sands, limestone, and coal beds, and recovery of these reserves was previously uneconomical.
While some of this new development is occurring in areas with mature oil and gas fields, vast areas with
very little or no previous oil and gas development also are now being developed. As a result, there are
rising concerns over potential impacts on human health and the environment, especially with regard to
potential effects on drinking water sources. Environmental concerns include the potential for
contamination of shallow ground water by stray gases (methane), formation waters (brines), and
fracturing chemicals associated with unconventional gas development.
Congress urged EPA in December 2009 to study the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and
drinking water. The study was to be conducted using a credible approach that relied on the best
available science as well as independent sources of information, and through a transparent, peer-
reviewed process that would ensure the validity and accuracy of the data. EPA consulted with other
federal agencies and appropriate state and interstate regulatory agencies in carrying out the study (US
EPA, 2010a). In February 2011, EPA issued the Draft Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic
Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources (US EPA, 2011a). The final Plan to Study the Potential Impacts
of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources was released in November 2011 (US EPA, 2011b).
In 2011, EPA began to research the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water
resources, if any, and to identify the driving factors that could affect the severity and frequency of any
such impacts. EPA scientists focused primarily on hydraulic fracturing of shale formations, with some
study of other oil- and gas-producing formations, including coal beds. EPA designed the scope of the
research around five stages of the hydraulic fracturing water cycle (US EPA, 2012). Each stage of the
cycle is associated with a primary research question:
Water acquisition: What are the potential impacts of large-volume water withdrawals from
ground water and surface waters on drinking water resources?
Chemical mixing: What are the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing fluid surface spills on or
near well pads on drinking water resources?
Well injection: What are the potential impacts of the injection and fracturing process on
drinking water resources?
Flowback and produced water: What are the potential impacts of flowback and produced water
(collectively referred to as "hydraulic fracturing wastewater") surface spills on or near well pads
on drinking water resources?
Wastewater treatment and waste disposal: What are the potential impacts of inadequate
treatment of hydraulic fracturing wastewater on drinking water resources?
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Prior to release of the study plan, EPA invited the public to nominate specific regions of the United
States for inclusion as potential sites for case studies. The plan identified 41 potential retrospective case
study sites. The retrospective case studies were to focus on investigating reported instances of drinking
water resource contamination in areas where hydraulic fracturing has already occurred and were
intended to inform several of the primary research questions related to chemical mixing, well injection,
and flowback and produced water. Of the 41 sites nominated during the stakeholder process, EPA
selected five sites across the United States at which to conduct retrospective case studies. The sites
were deemed illustrative of the types of problems that were reported to EPA during stakeholder
meetings held in 2010 and 2011. Additional information on site selection can be found in the Study Plan
(US EPA 2012). EPA's plan for the retrospective case studies was to make a determination on the
presence and extent of drinking water resource contamination as well as whether hydraulic fracturing or
related processes contributed to the contamination. Thus, the retrospective sites were expected to
provide EPA with information regarding key factors that may be associated with drinking water
contamination (US EPA, 2011b).
In 2011 EPA also began conducting investigations at the five selected retrospective case study locations
in Washington County, Pennsylvania (southwestern Pennsylvania); Bradford County, Pennsylvania
(northeastern Pennsylvania); Wise County, Texas; Las Animas and Huerfano counties, Colorado (Raton
Basin); and Dunn County, North Dakota (Killdeer). The Killdeer Retrospective Case Study was conducted
in Dunn County, North Dakota, near the city of Killdeer, where oil is being recovered from the Bakken
Shale (Figure 1). This case study differs from the other EPA retrospective case studies in that it focuses
on an oil well where a known release occurred during the hydraulic fracturing process. Specifically, a
blowout occurred in the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well in September 2010, during the fifth stage of a 23-
stage hydraulic fracture (Jacob, 2011). This resulted in a release of hydraulic fracturing fluids, oil, and
flowback water onto the land surface and possibly into the Killdeer aquifer. The release occurred when
an inner string of casing burst due to over-pressurization during the hydraulic fracturing process. The
release prompted state action, which led to the installation of monitoring wells on and around the well
pad; monitoring of nearby domestic wells, water supply wells (wells that supply water for oil and gas
activities), and municipal wells; removal of contaminated soil; and installation of a liner. Table 1 lists the
composition of the hydraulic fracturing fluid used and provided by the state. The North Dakota
Industrial Commission's (NDIC) Oil and Gas Division and the North Dakota Department of Health's
(NDDWQ) Division of Water Quality subsequently invited EPA to consider Killdeer as a retrospective case
study location (US EPA, 2012).
Although the blowout is a potential source of contamination of the Killdeer aquifer, it was not known at
the time of the blowout whether the aquifer had been previously impacted by contamination from
other sources. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of the ground water around the well pad was
conducted as part of this study to first determine an impact and then to account for all potential sources
of contamination. Two potential pathways for contamination of the Killdeer aquifer from the blowout
were considered: (1) Direct release from the Franchuk wellbore laterally into the Killdeer aquifer and (2)
Indirect contamination from surface infiltration of released fluids down into the Killdeer aquifer.
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Dunn County Sampling Area Locations
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
Dunn County, North Dakota
Figure 1. Killdeer retrospective case study location.
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
This report presents the Killdeer case study data and a discussion of the results. The following sections
of this report provide the purpose and scope of this case study; an overview of the case study site
background; study methods; historical water quality data; analysis of the study sample data; discussion
of site-specific focus areas; and a summary of the case study findings.
Table 1. Hydraulic fracturing chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well.
(Helms, 2010).
Chemical Name
2-Ethylhexanol
Acetic acid
Acrylamide
Sodium 2-Acrylamide
Alcohols, C10-16, ethoxylated
Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride
(C12-18)
Alkyl dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium
chloride (68% C12, 32%C14)
Amine phosphonate 1
Benzene, l-l'-oxybis-,tetrapropylene
derivatives, sulfonated (Calfax DBA-70)
Boric oxide
Canola oil
Colemanite
Diethylenetriamine
Diethylenetriamine alkylbenzene sulfate
Dihexamethylenetriaminepentakis
(methylene phosphonic acid) [a.k.a. - amine
phosphonate]
Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate
Dowicil 75
Emulsion breaker
Emulsion breaker
Emulsion breaker
Emulsion breaker
Ethanol
Ethoxylated nonyl phenol
Ethoxylated sorbitan monostearate
CAS Number
104-76-7
64-19-7
79-06-1
38193-60-1
68002-97-1
68391-01-5
85409-23-0
Proprietary
(ammonia salt of CAS
Number 34690-00-1)
119345-03-8
1303-86-2
1318-33-8
111-40-0
40139-72-8
34690-00-1
38011-25-5
4080-31-3
29316-47-0
153795-76-7
68036-95-3
30704-64-4
64-17-5
9016-45-9
9005-67-8
Active Ingredient
Concentration - %
5
60
0.025
27.6
1.8
6.25
6.25
25
7.5
10
20
50
1.5
22
24
1.5
0.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.8
5
0.847
Hydraulic
Fracturing Fluid
Concentration,
ug/L
46.67
109.58
0.05
50.41
3.29
3.70
3.70
29.63
70.01
560.07
1,120.13
4,772.73
14.00
205.36
28.45
84.01
47.73
28.00
14.00
14.00
14.00
0.47
280.03
1.55
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 1. Hydraulic fracturing chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well.
(Helms, 2010).
Chemical Name
Formaldehyde
Glutaraldehyde
Heavy aromatic solvent naphtha
Hydrochloric acid
Hydroxypropyl guar
Isopropyl alcohol (Isopropanol)
Low odor paraffin solvent
Methanol
Mineral oil
Naphthalene
Organophyllicclay
Petroleum distillate blend
Phosphoric acid
Potassium carbonate
Potassium hydroxide
Propylene carbonate
Sodium chloride
Sodium glycolate
Sodium hydroxide
Sodium tetraborate pentahydrate
Sorbitan monooleate
Tert-butyl hydroperoxide
Tetramethylammonium chloride
Tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate
Tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate
triethanolamine hydrochloride
Trisodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate
Trisodium nitrilotriacetate
Xanthan gum
CAS Number
50-00-0
111-30-8
64742-94-5
7647-01-0
39421-75-5
67-63-0
64742-47-8
67-56-1
64742-46-7(or 8)
91-20-3
68953-58-2
64741-84-1
7664-38-2
584-08-7
1310-58-3
108-32-7
7647-14-5
2836-32-0
1310-73-2
12179-04-3
1338-43-8
75-91-2
75-57-0
64-02-8
64-02-8
637-39-8
19019-43-3
5064-31-3
(various CAS #s
listed)
Active Ingredient
Concentration - %
0.04
25
5
2
60
36.5
23.3
16
70
1
3
60
0.5
40
13
1
3.98
5
1.5
5
1.05
100
50
60
0.014
4.62
1.5
1.5
1
Hydraulic
Fracturing Fluid
Concentration,
Hg/L
0.05
14.82
46.67
2.37
21,363.64
340.71
42.55
18.96
3,920.46
9.33
168.02
21,363.64
0.59
2,240.26
728.08
56.01
7.27
280.03
84.01
280.03
1.92
684.52
466.72
3,360.39
0.03
2.74
84.01
84.01
95.45
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
2. Purpose and Scope
As a component of EPA's National Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking
Water Resources (US EPA, 2012), five retrospective case studies were conducted to investigate reported
instances of drinking water resource contamination in areas of natural gas development and use of
hydraulic fracturing technology. These studies were intended to inform primary research questions
related to the hydraulic fracturing water cycle (US EPA, 2012).
This report presents the results of the retrospective case study conducted near the city of Killdeer, in
Dunn County, North Dakota. This report also describes the changes in general water quality,
geochemistry, and isotopic parameters of shallow ground water in the Killdeer aquifer that may have
resulted from the blowout that occurred in the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well. This study is focused on the
September, 2010 blowout event that occurred during the fifth stage of a 23-stage hydraulic fracture of
the Franchuk well. Water quality results are used to evaluate the potential impacts on drinking water
resources, if any, from various land use activities not restricted to shale-oil drilling and production
because pre-development water quality information at the Franchuk well pad was available. The
evaluation of potential impacts includes consideration of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing of
the Franchuk well, and analyses of dissolved gases, deep brine geochemistry in relation to shallow
ground water geochemistry, historical ground water quality for the Killdeer aquifer in Dunn County, and
time-dependent geochemical trends. Potential causes of water quality impairment that were evaluated
include: industrial/commercial land use; historical land use (e.g., farming); current drilling
processes/practices; historical drilling practices; and naturally occurring sources of contamination.
This report presents analytical data for water samples from the Killdeer site representing domestic wells,
water supply wells, municipal wells, and monitoring wells sampled at least twice during three rounds
spanning 15 months (July 2011, October 2011, and October 2012). The water samples were analyzed
for up to 230 constituents, including organic compounds, nutrients, major anions, major cations, trace
elements, dissolved gases, and selected isotopes. Ground water quality data and summary statistics are
presented for sampled constituents. In addition to chemical data collected specifically for this study, the
report includes analysis of historical data from the USGS NWIS database, the North Dakota State Water
Commission (NDWC) database, and from Klausing (1976) for the Killdeer aquifer in Dunn County.
Each of the retrospective case study sites differs in geologic and hydrologic characteristics; however,
generally similar research approaches were followed at each case study location to assess potential
drinking water impacts. The scope of this study includes: sampling and analysis of water wells, literature
review of background geology and hydrology; selection of sampling locations and the development of a
site-specific quality assurance project plan (QAPP); sampling and analysis of water wells; analysis of
historical background data and evaluation of new results against background data; statistical and
geochemical evaluation of water quality data; evaluation of impacts observed with specific sources of
contamination, and further refinement of relationships between the sources of contamination and the
observed impacts on water quality.
10
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
3. Study Area Background
3.1. Geology
Dunn County is situated on the Missouri Slope Uplands of the Great Plains Province. The eastern
portion of Dunn County shows evidence of glaciation, while the western third does not. The Missouri
Slope Uplands are characterized by gently rolling hills interrupted by isolated buttes (topographic highs
with flat tops and steep sides). In the northern part of the county, the Missouri Slope is interrupted by
the Little Missouri River Badlands. The Killdeer Mountains (composed of two large mesas) are a major
geographic feature within the county. The mesas rise approximately 700 feet (ft) above the surrounding
topography, with the highest point in the county located on South Killdeer Mountain (3,281 feet)
(Murphy, 2001).
Figure 2 presents a stratigraphic column of Dunn County. The geology of Dunn County consists of thick
sequences of Paleozoic (250 to 540 million years old), Mesozoic (65 to 250 million years old), and
Cenozoic (0 to 65 million years old) rocks, which have accumulated in the Williston basin. The beds dip
slightly to the north-northwest into the center of the basin. The estimated top of the Precambrian
crystalline rocks is between 11,000 and 13,400 feet below sea level in Dunn County (Heck, 1988;
Murphy, 2001; Heck et al., 2013).
Approximately 7,500 feet of Paleozoic rocks underlie Dunn County (Murphy, 2001). The Paleozoic
sequence in North Dakota is predominantly carbonate rocks, although clastic rock formations occur at
both the beginning and end of this time period.
Mesozoic rocks in North Dakota are primarily marine shales, with non-marine deposits at the base
(Inyan Kara Formation) and at the top (Hell Creek Formation) of this interval (see Figure 2). In Dunn
County, the Mesozoic rocks are approximately 5,400 feet thick (Carlson and Anderson, 1966; Murphy,
2001). In North Dakota, the Cretaceous rocks are split into three stratigraphic groups: Dakota,
Colorado, and Montana (Murphy, 2001).
Cenozoic rocks in Dunn County include the Fort Union Group (Ludlow, Cannonball, Slope, Tongue River,
and Sentinel Butte formations) and the Golden Valley, White River, and Arikaree formations (Figure 2).
The Fort Union Group is approximately 100 feet thick and is made up of the non-marine Ludlow
Formation, which comprises alternating beds of sandstone, siltstone, claystone, mudstone, and lignite
(soft coal). The Ludlow Formation is overlain by the Slope Formation in the Little Missouri River Valley
and the marine Cannonball Formation in the Missouri River Valley (Murphy, 2001).
The Sentinel Butte formation is present at the surface in at least 75 % of the county and is the oldest
strata exposed in the county. The Sentinel Butte Formation consists of alternating beds of sandstone,
siltstone, mudstone, claystone, and lignite. Several thick coal beds are present in the Sentinel Butte
Formation in Dunn County. At least one of these coals, the Dunn Center bed, has been considered for
possible mining (Murphy, 2001).
Soils in Dunn County primarily consist of tertiary alluvial and glacial deposits. The deposits generally
consist of clay, silt, sand, and gravel derived from local bedrock (USDA, 2013). These properties give an
indication of the movement of water and other parameters from the surface to underlying aquifers and
the surface runoff potential, which is important because the Franchuk well blowout created a surface
11
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Ira
System
G-'OUp
Quaternary
Alluvium, Col'uv um, and I
C0!t*h,ifbQF
Dominant lithotomy
Sand, Clay, jnd Gr,tvi>l
S.ind. Sil! C,iy, I'll and Gravel
V
6
Q Tertiary
Cretaceous
£
*~<
1
I
Jurassic
TriasMC
'E
o
1
S °-
S 2
c g
lu
otorado
Group
3 a
3 8
35
Ankaree
White Riwr
Go'den Valley
Sentinel Butte
Cjnnonbsll
Ludtow
Hell Creek
Fox Hilli
Pierre
Ntobrara
Oirtil^*
Gr
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
spill. The possibility that the spilled fluid leached is an important potential pathway of contamination to
reach the Killdeer aquifer.
Figure 3 presents a soil survey map of the soil types near the Franchuk well pad. Twelve different soil
series are present near the well pad (USDA, 2013), and these 12 soil series, alone or mixed, represent
the 18 soil types located near the Franchuk well. Table 2 lists these soils and selected soil properties
(USDA, 2013). The Franchuk well pad is situated on the Velva fine sandy loam (see Figure 3). Based on
the properties listed in Table 2, it is expected that a fluid spilled at the soil surface would likely infiltrate
through the vadose zone and into the Killdeer aquifer.
Figures. Map of the soil types in the vicinity of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well pad. The red rectangle is the
approximate location of the well pad. See Table 2 for key to the soil names and information. (Modified from
USDA, 2013).
13
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 2. Soil types and selected properties. (USDA, 2013).
Soil Name
Belfield-Farland silt loam
Belfield-Grail silty clay loam
Cohagen-Vebar fine sandy loam
9-25% slope
Cohagen-Vebar-rock outcrop
complex
Daglum silt loam
Farland silt loam
Farland-Rhoades silt loam
Morton silt loam 3-6% slope
Morton-Rhoades silt loam
Parshall fine sandy loam
RhoadesSilt loam
Shambo loam 3-6% slopes
Straw loam channeled
Straw-Rhoades silt loam
Vebar fine sandy loam
Vebar-Parshall fine sandy loam
1-6% slope
Composition
50% Belfield and 40% Farland
Series soils
45% Belfield and 40% Grail
Series soils
45% Cohagen and 40% Vebar
Series soils
45% Cohagen, and 30% Vebar
Series soils; and 15% rock
outcrop
Daglum Series soil
Frland Series soil
60% Farland and 25% Rhoades
Series soils
Morton Series Soil
55% Morton and 50% Rhoades
Series soils
Parshall Series soil
Rhoades Series soil
Shambo
Straw Series soil
60% Straw and 30% Rhoades
Series soils
Vebar Series soil
45% Vebar and 40% Parshall
Series soils
Map
Symbol1
15
18
30E
31F
106 B
27
29B
49 B
52C
54B
62B
102 B
3
7
81D
81B
Drainage
Well-drained
Well-drained
Excessively to moderately
well-drained
Excessively to well-drained
Moderately well-drained
Well-drained
Well-drained to moderately
well-drained
Well-drained
Well-drained to moderately
well-drained
Well-drained
Moderately well- drained
Well-drained
Well-drained
Well-drained to moderately
well-drained
Well-drained
Well-drained
Permeability2
Slow to moderate
Slow
Moderately rapid
Moderately rapid
Very slow
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate to very slow
Moderately rapid
Very slow
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderately rapid
Moderately rapid
Surface
Runoff
Slow
Slow
Rapid
Rapid
Slow
Slow
Medium
Medium
Medium
Slow
Slow
Medium
Slow
Slow to very
slow
Slow
Slow
14
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 2. Soil types and selected properties. (USDA, 2013).
Soil Name
Vebar-Parshall fine sandy loam
6-9% slope
Velva fine sandy loam
Wayden silty clay
Composition
60% Vebar and 20% Parshall
Series soils
Velva Series soil
Wayden Series soil
Map
Symbol1
81C
79
94E
Drainage
Well-drained
Well-drained
Well-drained
Permeability2
Moderately rapid
Moderately rapid
Slow
Surface
Runoff
Medium
Slow
Slow
Data Source: USDA (2013)
1 Corresponds to Figure 3 in this report
2 Permeability: very slow = <0.06 inches/hr, slow = 0.06 to 0.20 inches/hr, moderately slow = 0.2 to 0.6 inches/hr, moderate = 0.6 to 2.0 inches/hr, moderately rapid = 2.0 to 6.0
inches/hr, rapid = 6.0 to 20 inches/hr, and very rapid = >20 inches/hr.
15
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
3.2. Hydrology
Background information on the hydrology of Dunn County is summarized from Klausing (1976).
Numerous rivers, streams, and creeks flow through the county. Spring Creek and the Little Missouri,
Knife, and Green rivers are the primary rivers in the county (Klausing, 1976). The Missouri and Little
Missouri rivers drain the northern portion of the county; Spring Creek drains the central portion; and the
Little Knife, Knife, and Green rivers drain the southern portion of the county (Murphy, 2001). Most rural
areas and the cities of Halliday and Killdeer get their water from private and public wells from the
Killdeer Aquifer (Klausing, 1976).
Aquifers in Dunn County are found in rocks that were deposited before glaciation and within areas of
glacial deposits. Glacial deposits in Dunn County consist of till and glaciofluvial sand and gravel. The
primary aquifers lie within sand and gravel deposits that are confined to glacial melt-water channels and
include the Killdeer, Horse Nose Butte, Knife River, and Goodman Creek aquifers. In addition to aquifers
located in glacial deposits, other aquifers in consolidated deposits include the Fox Hills, Hell Creek,
Cannonball, Ludlow, Tongue River, and Sentinel Butte Formations (Klausing, 1976). The Killdeer aquifer
is of particularly importance in this study because it directly underlies the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well pad
and because nearby water wells are completed within the Killdeer aquifer. The Killdeer aquifer
underlying the well pad is unconfined to semi-confined.
The Killdeer aquifer occupies an area of about 74 square miles (mi2) in Dunn County (see Figures 4 and
5). The aquifer is composed predominantly of fine to medium sand and is generally overlain by clay and
silt soils (Klausing, 1976). Several test holes indicate that fine to coarse gravel occurs near the base. The
maximum thickness of the aquifer is 233 feet, and the mean thickness is 80 feet. During the study, the
depth to water ranged from 19.8 to 33.6 feet below ground surface (bgs).
The aquifer is recharged by infiltration of precipitation. Water levels in the aquifer range from about 0.3
feet (0.09 meters) below ground surface to about 37 feet (11 meters) below ground surface. Seasonal
fluctuations in the water table range from about 1 foot (0.3 meters) to a maximum of about 7 feet (2
meters). The minimum seasonal fluctuations occur in a confined portion of the aquifer, whereas the
maximum fluctuations occur in an unconfined portion (Klausing, 1976).
In general, the water is hard and consists of either a sodium-bicarbonate type or a sodium-sulfate type.
Water obtained from the northern portion of the aquifer is of better quality than water obtained from
the southern portion. Total dissolved solids (TDS) in the northern portion rarely exceed 1,100 milligrams
per liter (mg/L), but TDS commonly exceed 2,000 mg/L in the southern portion of the aquifer (Klausing,
1976).
According to information provided by Terracon (the contractor to Denbury Onshore, LLC) to the North
Dakota Department of Water Quality (NDDWQ), the ground water flow direction is to the southwest and
has a relatively uniform gradient of 0.0009 to 0.0008 ft/ft. Given the shallow gradients (determined at
the site), ground water flow direction and gradient could vary seasonally depending on precipitation and
water usage. The North Dakota State Water Commission stated that the ground water flow within the
Killdeer aquifer is < 1 ft /year (Helms, 2010).
16
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Figure 4. A map showing the Killdeer aquifer, Dunn County, North Dakota. Cross section From A to A' is shown in
Figure 5. (Source: Shaver, 2009).
17
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
A'
Figure 5. Generalized cross section of the Killdeer aquifer along the line A to A' in Figure 4. (Source: Shaver, 2009).
The Sentinel Butte aquifers consist of poorly consolidated sandstone and fractured lignite. The
sandstone aquifers within the Sentinel Butte formation are generally sandstone with clay and silt.
Thicknesses range up to 119 feet. Transmissivities from three tests from lignite zones in the Sentinel
Butte Formation ranged from 920 to 49 square feet per day (ft2/day). The lignite aquifers are randomly
spaced throughout the formation and range in thickness from 1 to 20 ft. Wells generally yield 1 to 200
gallons per minute (g/min), but not all lignite beds will yield water. Water from both aquifer zones is
generally a hard to very hard, sodium-bicarbonate type (Klausing, 1976).
3.3. Oil and Gas Production
The existence of hydrocarbons in North Dakota and the Williston Basin was known before 1900, and the
area has a long history of hydrocarbon development (Heck et al., 2013). Natural gas was first reported
in the 1890s from artesian wells in Cretaceous formations near Edgely, North Dakota (Heck et al., 2013).
The Cedar Creek gas field was the oldest commercial hydrocarbon production field in North Dakota and
first produced in 1929 (Heck et al., 2013). North Dakota, in 2013, ranked second in terms of oil
production in the United States (USEIA, 2014).
In Dunn County, oil and gas production began in 1959 and is produced primarily from 18 oil fields
(Murphy, 2001). Until 1999, production was from the Mission Canyon Formation (Lower Mississippian
age) in the Little Knife field, which produced more than 49 million barrels (bbls) of oil (Murphy, 2001).
Between 1990 and 2006, oil production rates ranged from 60,000 to 160,000 bbls per month from
approximately 100 wells (Battelle, 2013). From 1990 to 2005, natural gas production in Dunn County
ranged from 4,000,000 to 5,000,000 thousand cubic feet (MCF) per month. When horizontal drilling
began in 2005, this volume increased exponentially, reaching more than 13,000,000 MCF per month by
2011 (Battelle, 2013). Approximately 1,095 conventional oil and gas wells are completed in Dunn
County; some uncertainty is associated with this number because of incomplete historical records
(Battelle, 2013). Today, the Madison and Bakken Formations account for most of the oil and gas
production in Dunn County (Figure 6; Battelle, 2013).
18
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
=5 300
- 8000
6000
4000
CD
_Q
E
2000:
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Year
O
3.00E+008
O
:2.00E+008-
El-OOE+008-
03
O
O.OOE+000
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Year
Figures. Oil and gas production in North Dakota from 1998 through 2012. (A) Oil Production and (B) Gas
Production. Red bars = total production from all producing formations, black bars = Bakken formation, red lines
and circles = total wells, black lines and circles = Bakken wells. (Source NDIC, 2013a).
3.4. Land Use
Dunn County is a sparsely populated (population of 3,967), rural county in North Dakota (U.S. Census
Bureau, 2012) and covers approximately 2,082 square miles (mi2) (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). Unlike
other counties in North Dakota, Dunn County has both prairie and badland areas, as well as the Killdeer
Mountains in the northwest portion of the county (Dunn County, 2012). Until recently, the county's
economy depended on ranching, farming, and recreational activities (City of Killdeer, 2013). Recently,
gas and oil production has increased dramatically in scale and importance (Dunn County, 2012).
19
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Although Dunn County experienced a short-lived oil boom in 1976, oil production increased rapidly in
the county beginning in 2006 because of the new hydraulic fracturing-based exploitation of oil reserves
in the Bakken Shale (NDIC, 2013).
Land uses in Dunn County are depicted on Figure 7. The land use map was created using data from the
National Land Cover Database (NLCD) for Dunn County for 1992 and 2006. Table 3 presents a summary
of these data (USGS, 2012a). The NLCD is based on 30-meter resolution data from the Landsat satellite,
and the dataset for 2006 was the most recent one available.
Table 3. Land use in Dunn County in 1992 and 2006. (USGS, 2012a).
Land Use
Grassland/herbaceous
Row/cultivated crops
Shrub/scrub
Fallow
Open water
Pasture/hay
Barren
Emergent herbaceous wetlands
Developed
Woody wetlands
Deciduous forest
Transitional
Urban/recreational grass
Evergreen forest
Mixed forest
Total
1992
Square Miles
1,089
390
238
219
57.6
57.4
18.2
5.3
4.2
1.8
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.0
2,082
% of Total
52.3
18.7
11.4
10.5
2.8
2.8
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
2006
Square Miles
1,223
432
44.2
0.0
53.4
86.2
23.6
16.9
36.1
13.3
137
0.0
0.0
9.3
7.2
2,082
% of Total
58.7
20.7
2.1
0.0
2.6
4.1
1.1
0.8
1.7
0.6
6.6
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.3
99.7
Although the data for land use in the two years are not comparable due to changes in input data and
mapping methodologies (Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium, 2013), the NLCD data
indicate that, in both years, grassland/herbaceous land and row/cultivated crop land (i.e., land suitable
for grazing or used for growing crops) were the largest land use categories in the county. Additional
analyses of land use and land use changes, with particular focus on the area adjacent to the sampling
locations of this study, are presented in Appendix C.
20
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
r
Manning
2006
Manning
0 2.5 5 10 15
] Mies
Pfc OfOlWjIer CtiiiliridillobjcHiiH ^J MmUqnllouiiliiie
^^
Jjntullnn !m It! Smphg bains
foret
USSS f^
Land Use/Land Cover
1992 and 2006
Dunn County, North Dakota
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
Figure 7. Land use in Dunn County, North Dakota, in 1992 and 2006. Search area represents a 3-mile radius from the Franchuk 44-20 SHW well.
21
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
3.5. Other Contaminant Sources
Once an impact on water quality was determined, a consistent approach was adopted for evaluating
potential contaminant sources in order to help determine whether hydraulic fracturing was the cause or
one of the causes of alleged impacts on water quality.
To determine whether any potential sources of contamination unrelated to hydraulic fracturing
activities may have impacted ground water and surface water in the study area, a detailed background
assessment, including a search of relevant databases/information sources listed below, was conducted.
The detailed findings of this background assessment and search are provided in Appendix C.
The following databases and information sources were considered in the evaluation of alternative
contaminant sources:
Environmental Records Search: Environmental records searches were performed by obtaining
environmental record reports from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). EDR provides a
service for searching publically available databases and provides data from their own
proprietary databases.
Well Inventory: Existing oil and gas well inventories were prepared on the same search areas
used for the EDR reports using the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources Division of
Oil and Gas database.
State Record Summary: The North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources Division of Oil and
Gas database was used to find up-to-date well records for the study areas.
The evaluation of other contaminant sources in the study area considered all potential contaminant
sources that could contribute to any detected levels of surface and/or ground water contamination. To
conduct an effective evaluation, all hypothesized causes of an environmental impairment needed to be
"sufficiently credible" (US EPA, 2000a) to be included in the analysis. Candidate alternative contaminant
sources were categorized as follows: industrial/commercial land use; historical land use (e.g., farming
and mining); historical drilling practices; and naturally occurring sources.
Based on the review of the environmental records search, nine potential sources of contamination were
identified. Eight of the nine sources were USTs where leaks have occurred or potentially occurred. The
other was an automotive service station where there may have been unreported releases of automotive
fluids. All these locations were within 0.5 miles of NDGW16. In addition, oil and gas well inventories
were obtained. This revealed that 35 oil and gas wells were within a 3-mile radius of the Franchuk well
and seven well were within a 1-mile radius of the well. A state record search did not identify any notices
of violations for any of these wells.
A report produced by Battelle (2013) stated that the most significant causes of water quality impacts in
Dunn County were agriculture; oil and gas activities; wastewater discharges; industrial, manufacturing
and commercial activities; and other nonpoint sources. In Dunn County, agriculture comprises a
significant portion of the economy and land use, with approximately 1,800 square miles dedicated to
this activity (Battelle, 2013). Agricultural impacts on ground water include nutrients, pathogens,
herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and fertilizers (Battelle, 2013). Battelle (2013) also suggests that oil
and gas activities are potential sources of impacts on ground water. The oil and gas activities cited
22
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
include conventional and unconventional oil and gas development and saltwater disposal wells (Battelle,
2013). In the Battelle report (2013), wastewater discharges included centralized waste water treatment
facilities, septic systems, cesspools, and permitted direct discharges to surface water. According to
Batelle, these types of discharges could potentially cause impacts to ground water quality by discharging
pathogens, household and industrial chemicals, suspended solids, increased biochemical oxygen
demand, and nutrients (Battelle, 2013). Battelle (2013) also discussed industrial, manufacturing, and
commercial activities and reported that these were primarily construction, transportation, and repair
and maintenance activities (leaking USTs fall into this category). Metals, acids, caustics, cyanides,
polychlorinated biphenyls, poly aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons,
BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) compounds, and oxygenates were the
contaminants of concern that could potentially impact ground water in Dunn County (Battelle, 2013). A
final category discussed in Battelle (2013) was nonpoint sources, which included storm water runoff
(urban, residential, and roads) and sewer overflows. They listed the following contaminants from
nonpoint sources that could potentially impact ground water quality: suspended solids, metals,
nutrients, organic compounds, pathogens, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Battelle, 2013). It is
important to note that for ground water impairments, they did not distinguish data based on which
aquifer the water quality impairment was in or impairments near the Franchuk well pad. Although
Battelle reported ground water contamination, there is uncertainty about its applicability to this study,
which focuses on the Killdeer aquifer and the localized extent of the Killdeer aquifer being investigated.
23
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
4. Study Methods
This section describes the methods used in this study for the collection of water samples, sample
analysis, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), data handling and analysis. The sampling history,
parameters measured, and analytical methods used are summarized in Table 4. A more detailed
description of the sampling methods, analytical methods, and QA/QC is presented in the Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and
Dunn County, ND (Beak, 2013).
Table 4. Test methods used to analyze ground water samples.
Analyte
Dissolved Gases
Metals (ICP-OES, dissolved and total)
Metals (ICP-OES, dissolved and total)
Metals (ICP-MS, dissolved and total)
Anions (Chloride, Bromide, Sulfate,
and Fluoride)
Bromide
Bromide
Iodide
Nitrate + Nitrite, and Ammonia
DICs (Dissolved Inorganic Carbons)
DOCs(Dissolved Organic Carbons)
VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds)
Low Molecular Weight Acids
SVOC (Semi-Volatile Organic
Compounds)
DRO (Diesel Range Organics)
GRO (Gasoline Range Organics)
Glycols
Glycols
87Sr/86Sr Isotope analysis
Acrylamide
Laboratory
Shaw- Ada1
Shaw- Ada1
EPA Region 7
contract lab
(SWRI)
EPA Region 7
contract lab
(SWRI)
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
EPA- Ada2
Shaw- Ada1
Shaw- Ada1
EPA- Region 83
EPA- Region 83
EPA- Region 83
EPA- Region 34
EPA- Las Vegas5
uses6
EPA- Las Vegas5
Method
RSKSOP-175v5 & 194v4
EPA Method 200.7 (analysis) SW-846
Method 3015A (digestion)
EPA Method 200.7 (analysis &
digestion)
EPA Method 7470A (Hg)
EPA Method 6020A (analysis)
EPA Method 200.7 (digestion)
SW-846 Method 6500
RSKSOP-214v5
SW-846 Method 6500
RSKSOP-223v2
EPA Method 350.1 and 353.1
SW-846 Method 9060A
SW-486 Method 9060A
SW-846 Method 5021A and 8260C
RSKSOP-112v6
SW-846 Method 8270D
SW-846 Method 8015 D
SW-846 Method 8015 D
Method in development7
Method in development7
Thermal ionization mass
spectrometry
Method in development8
Sampling
Rounds
1,2,3
1,2
3
3
1,2,3
2
3
3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2
3
2,3
2,3
24
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 4. Test methods used to analyze ground water samples.
Analyte
Alkylphenols, Ethoxylated Alcohols,
Ethoxylated Alkylphenols
O, H stable isotopes of water
Laboratory
EPA- Las Vegas5
Shaw- Ada
Method
Method in development9
RSKSOP296vl, RSKSOP-334vO
Sampling
Rounds
2,3
2,3
Shaw Environmental, Ada, Oklahoma.
General Parameters Laboratory, EPA, Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division, Ada, Oklahoma.
EPA Region 8 Laboratory, Golden Colorado.
EPA Region 3 Laboratory, Fort Meade, Maryland.
EPA NERL Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.
USGS Denver, Colorado.
Method based on ASTM D773-11.
8 Method based on EPA Method 8032A and 8316.
9 Method based on ASTM D7485-09 and USGS method 01433-01
4.1. Sampling Locations
Water quality samples were collected from three domestic wells, nine monitoring wells, one state well
(used to monitor water levels in the Killdeer aquifer), one municipal well, and two water supply wells.
Three sampling rounds occurred in July 2011, October 2011, and October 2012 (Table 4). Samples were
analyzed for up to 230 constituents, including field parameters, major ions, nutrients, trace metals,
VOCs and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), diesel-range organics (DRO), gasoline-range
organics (GRO), glycol ethers (diethylene, triethylene, and tetraethylene glycol and 2-butoxyethanol),
low-molecular-weight acids (lactate, formate, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, and butyrate),
alkylphenols, ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated alkylphenols, dissolved gases (methane, ethane,
propane, and butane), and selected stable isotopes (518OH2o, 52HH2o, and 87Sr/86Sr; see Appendix B).
As noted above, the Killdeer aquifer underlies the Franchuk well pad. The Franchuk wells are located
approximately 2.5 miles outside the wellhead protection zone of the City of Killdeer's municipal water
supply wells. In addition, several domestic wells, farm wells, and supply wells for drilling and hydraulic
fracturing are located approximately 0.5 miles downgradient of the Franchuk 44-20 well.
The geographic distribution of the Killdeer aquifer is shown on Figure 4. A geologic cross section of the
aquifer near the Franchuk well is shown on Figure 5 (Shaver, 2009).
Nine monitoring wells were installed immediately after the spill in locations where contamination was
suspected based on hydrogeologic conditions at the site and data collected by the North Dakota
Industrial Commission (NDIC) and Terracon. Four ground water monitoring wells (NDGW01 through
NDGW04) were installed by Terracon (contracted by the well operator, Denbury Resources, Inc.) in
September 2010 to monitor for potential ground water contamination in the Killdeer aquifer. An
additional five monitoring wells (NDGW05 through NDGW09) were installed at the site in April 2011, by
Terracon. Wells NDGW05 and NDGW06 were placed upgradient and within 20 feet of the Franchuk
wells. Wells NDGW07 through NDGW09 were placed similarly to wells NDGW05 and NDGW06, but
downgradient of the Franchuk wells, and NDGW09 was nested with NDGW08. NDGW08 was screened
in a shallower zone of the Killdeer aquifer, and NDGW09 was screened near the bottom of the Killdeer
aquifer. The draft boring logs of the monitoring well locations, prepared by Terracon, identified fine to
medium silty sand as the dominant aquifer material, with varying silt content. Some logs reported sandy
clay or gravelly sand horizons. While drilling NDGW09, bedrock was encountered at 205 feet below
25
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
ground surface (bgs), coal was encountered from 205 to 207 feet bgs, and shale was encountered from
207 to 213 feet bgs, which suggests that this well may have actually penetrated into the Sentinel Butte
aquifer. Wells NDGW01, NDGW02, NDGW03, NDGW05, and NDGW07 were completed to depths less
than 50 feet bgs. NDGW04 was completed to a depth of 72 feet bgs, NDGW06 was completed to a
depth of 70 feet bgs, NDGW08 was completed to a depth of 120 feet bgs, and NDGW09 was completed
to a depth of 213 feet bgs. The length of the screened intervals for the monitoring wells ranged from 10
to 40 feet. Except for NDGW09, the depth to ground water in all monitoring wells is within a few feet of
one another at approximately 30 feet bgs. The elevation of ground water in NDGW09 is consistently 10
feet higher than in the other monitoring wells. NDGW09 is screened in clay and bedrock, and a 1-foot-
thick horizon of fine to medium sand is present in the clay.
These nine monitoring wells, along with three domestic wells, two water supply wells (used for drilling
activities in the area), one state well, and one city of Killdeer municipal supply well, were part of the
periodic sampling program. The sampling locations are identified in Table 5 and are shown on Figure 8.
The domestic wells near the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well location were sampled via homeowner taps.
According to the state, the domestic wells are screened in the Killdeer aquifer (NDWC, 2013).
Table 5. Sampling Locations.
Sample ID
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
State ID
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8D
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Truchan Depot
Well 14509529AAAD
CW-4
CW-5
Latitude
47.359167 N
47.358056 N
47.358333 N
47.358056 N
47.358611 N
47.358611 N
47.358333 N
47.358333 N
47.358333 N
47.365833 N
47.352222 N
47.351111 N
47.353611 N
47.356944 N
47.364444 N
47.365833 N
Longitude
102.804722 W
102.805000 W
102.804167 W
102.805833 W
102.805556 W
102.805278 W
102.805278 W
102.805556 W
102.805556 W
102.807778 W
102.800556 W
102.799444 W
102.800833 W
102.801389 W
102.757778 W
102.753889 W
Well Type
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Monitoring
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Supply
State
Municipal
Supply
26
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Franchuk Well 44-20 SWH
(3-mile radius)
O
DUNN
COUNTY
NDGW09
NDGW08
NDGW04
NDGW01
, NDGW06
Franchuk 44-20 SWH
NDGW07
NOGW02
Search Area
Franchuk 44-20 SWH Well
c; EPA Sampling Locations
Well (Type Confidential)
Well (Oil & Gas)
EPA Sampling Location Map
Dunn County, North Dakota
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
Source: Basemap, ESRI, Sample Locations, EPA ORD,
Mfeffs- Wort ft Dakota Oepf of Na fora/ Resources Qil and Gas Division
Figure 8. Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Locations. (A) Shows the 3-mile radius and gives the locations of the non-pad wells sampled as part of
this study. (B) Shows a zoomed in view of the well pad and gives the locations of the pad wells sampled as part of this study.
27
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
4.2. Water Collection
Sample bottles for each location were uniquely labeled prior to each sampling round, and all labels were
color-coded by analytical parameter. See Table Al (Appendix A) for pre-cleaned bottle types and
number of sample bottles needed for each laboratory analysis.
Both field-filtered and unfiltered water samples were collected. Unfiltered samples were collected first,
and unfiltered samples that could contain volatile components were collected before samples with less
volatile components. The unfiltered samples were analyzed for the following parameters: dissolved
gases, VOCs, SVOCs, DROs GROs, glycols, low-molecular-weight acids, ethoxylate alcohols, alkylphenol
ethoxylates, alkylphenols, and total metals. Filtered samples were collected by placing a 0.45
micrometer (u.m) disposable capsule filter at the end of the polyethylene tubing and passing the water
stream through the filter into the sample container. Approximately 100 milliliters (ml) of ground water
was passed through the filter, to waste, before filling sample bottles. Filtered sample parameters
included dissolved metals, anions, nutrients (ammonia, nitrate + nitrite), dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIG), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), 618O/62H of water, and strontium isotope. A more detailed
description of the sampling methods is provided in the QAPP (Beak, 2013). Not all parameters
mentioned above were analyzed for each sampling round. Table 4 identifies the types of samples
collected during each sampling round. Sampling methods, sample preservation, and handling are
discussed in detail in the QAPP (Beak, 2013) and is described in Appendix A and Table Al.
Because of the different types of well construction, differences in the pumps in the wells, and intended
well uses of the sampled wells in this study, a well volume approach linked with the stabilization of
geochemical parameters was used for purging all the different types of wells (Yeskis and Zavala, 2002).
The purging methods for the different well types are discussed below.
4.2.1. Purging and Sampling at Domestic and Municipal Wells
Domestic well samples were collected as close to the wellhead as possible, prior to any water treatment
or pressure tanks. The well tap was turned on and a clean piece of polyethylene tubing was connected
to the sampling port, and the other end of the tubing was connected to a flow cell equipped with a YSI
5600 multi-parameter probe. The well was allowed to purge for 20 minutes before monitoring of
geochemical parameters was initiated. The well was then allowed to purge until stable geochemical
parameters (specific conductivity (SpC), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and oxidation-reduction potential
(ORP)) were achieved. Once stable geochemical parameters were obtained, the samples were collected.
All samples were preserved immediately upon collection (see Appendix A, Table Al) and stored on ice
prior to leaving the sampling location.
4.2.2. Purging and Sampling at Supply Wells
Water supply wells are designed for high flows to fill water trucks; the flow rates cannot be adjusted and
there is no tap from which samples can be collected. Terracon, the contractor for the operator,
designed an insert with a tap that is placed between the well and the truck tank to collect samples.
After the sampling insert was connected to the well and the tanker, the dedicated pump was powered
on. The water was allowed to flow for one to two minutes to purge any water in the lines before sample
collection was initiated. A sub-sample was collected to measure geochemical parameters before the
water samples were collected. All samples were preserved immediately upon collection (see Appendix
A, Table Al) and stored on ice before leaving the sampling location.
28
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
4.2.3. Purging and Sampling at Monitoring Wells
Monitoring wells were sampled using the following method: Water level measurements were taken
before pumping the wells. Water level measurements were taken using the Robert S. Kerr
Environmental Research Center Standard Operating Procedure (RSKSOPj-326. A dedicated piece of
tubing was connected to the sampling port of the well and the dedicated pump was powered on. Water
was allowed to pass through a flow cell equipped with an YSI 5600 multi-parameter probe (or
equivalent) to track the stabilization of the geochemical parameters. Once values for the geochemical
parameters stabilized, the flow cell was disconnected and samples were collected. All samples were
preserved immediately upon collection (see Appendix A, Table Al) and stored on ice before leaving the
sampling location. The water levels were measured again following sample collection to see whether
significant drawdown had occurred.
4.2.4. Purging and Sampling at the North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) Wells
A portable bladder pump (QED Sample Pro or equivalent) was used to sample the NDWC well. Water
level measurements were taken before purging the well. The portable bladder pump was then lowered
into the well, and the pump intake location was placed within the screened interval of the well. Tubing
from the sampling port was connected to the flow cell and the pump was powered on. Because of the
low flow rates (less than 50 milliliters per minute [mL/min]), the well was purged for a minimum of six
hours before geochemical parameters were measured. Once the values for the geochemical parameters
stabilized, the flow cell was disconnected and samples were collected. All samples were preserved
immediately upon collection (see Appendix A, Table Al) and stored on ice before leaving the sampling
location. The water levels were measured again following sample collection to see whether significant
drawdown had occurred.
4.2.5. Sample Handling
At the conclusion of each day, samples were organized by analytical parameter, placed together in
sealed Ziploc plastic bags, and transferred to coolers filled with ice. Glass bottles were packed with
bubble wrap to prevent breakage. A temperature blank and chain-of-custody form were placed in each
cooler. Coolers were sealed and affixed with a custody seal and sent to the appropriate lab, via express
delivery, within 24 hours of collection.
4.3. Water Analysis
4.3.1. Field Parameters
Temperature (US EPA Method 170.1), specific conductivity (SpC) (US EPA Method 120.1), pH (US EPA
Method 150.2), ORP, and DO (US EPA Method 360.1) were continuously monitored and logged during
well purging using an YSI 556 multi-parameter probe. YSI electrodes were calibrated every morning
before use. Performance checks were conducted after an initial calibration, again at midday, and at the
end of each day. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable 1413
microSiemens per centimeter (u.S/cm) specific conductance standard was used for calibration. NIST-
traceable buffer solutions (4.00, 7.00, and 10.01) were used for pH calibration. An ORP standard (Zobell
Solution) was used to calibrate the ORP sensor. DO sensors were calibrated with air. Electrode
performance was checked using the YSI 5580 Confidence Solution. Prior to deployment to the field, all
calibration and performance standards were checked to ensure that they had not expired or would
29
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
expire during the sampling round. Duplicate field measurements are not applicable to measurements in
a flow-through cell (RSKSOP-211v3).
Once the geochemical parameters had stabilized, a 1-liter sub-sample was collected for field
determinations of alkalinity, turbidity, ferrous iron, and dissolved sulfide. Alkalinity measurements were
determined by titrating ground water with 1.6N sulfuric acid (H2SO4) to the bromcresol green-methyl
red endpoint using a HACH titrator (US EPA Method 310.1). Turbidity measurements (US EPA Method
180.1) were determined with a Hach 2100Q portable meter. Ferrous iron measurements were collected
using the 1,10-phenanthroline colorimetric method (HACH DR/890 colorimeter, Standard Method 3500-
FeB for Wastewater). Dissolved sulfide measurements were collected using the methylene blue
colorimetric method (HACH DR/890 spectrophotometer, Standard Method 4500-S2"D for Wastewater).
Hach spectrophotometers (ferrous iron and sulfide) and turbidimeters (turbidity) were inspected before
going to the field, and their function was verified using performance calibration check solutions. The
ferrous iron accuracy was checked by making duplicate measurements of a 1 mg Fe/L standard solution
(HACH Iron Standard solution, using Ferrover pillows); the results were between 0.90 and 1.10 mg Fe/L.
Accuracy and precision of sulfide measurements were checked using a standard solution of sodium
sulfide prepared in the laboratory that had been titrated with sodium thiosulfate to determine its
concentration. Accuracy should be within ±10 percent of the expected concentration and the
coefficient of variation should be less than 20 percent. Turbidity was checked against turbidity
standards supplied by Hach (StablCaf Calibration Set for the HACH 2011Q), which consist of four
standards (20 nephelometric turbidity units [NTU], 100 NTU, and 800 NTU) with a 10 NTU performance
check standard. The performance check must be ±10 percent of the known concentration. Titrators
used for alkalinity measurements were checked using a 250 milligrams per liter (mg/L) standard made
from sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). The performance check must be ±10 percent of the known
concentration. Blanks (deionized water) and performance calibration check solutions (where applicable)
were measured at the beginning of the day, at midday, and at the end of the day for each parameter.
4.3.2. Analytical Methods for Ground Water
Water samples were collected and analyzed using the methods identified in Table Al, Appendix A.
Samples were collected and delivered to seven laboratories for analysis: EPA Office of Research and
Development/National Risk Management Laboratory/Groundwater and Ecosystems Restoration Division
(ORD/NRMRL/GWERD), Ada, Oklahoma; Shaw Environmental (name changed to CB&I due to change in
ownership during study), Ada, Oklahoma; EPA Region 8, Golden, Colorado; EPA Region 3, Fort Meade,
Maryland; U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Denver, Colorado; Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), San
Antonio, Texas; EPA ORD/National Exposure Research Lab (NERL), Las Vegas, Nevada; and a Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) laboratory (A4 Scientific, Inc., Woodlands, Texas) (see Appendix A, Table Al).
Anions, nutrients, DIG, and DOC were analyzed in-house (GWERD General Parameters Laboratory, Ada,
Oklahoma). Quantitative analyses of the major anions bromide, chloride, fluoride, and sulfate were
determined by capillary ion electrophoresis (US EPA Method 6500, RSKSOP-276v4) using a Waters
Quanta 4000 capillary ion analyzer for all sampling rounds. To provide better resolution of the bromide
in a high chloride matrix, bromide samples containing high chloride levels were also analyzed in round 2
using flow injection analysis (Lachat QuickChem 8000 Series flow injection analyzer RSKSOP-214v5) and
in round 3 with the capillary ion analyzer (US EPA Method 6500, RSKSOP-288v3 for high chloride levels).
Nutrients (nitrate + nitrite, ammonia) were measured by flow injection analysis (US EPA Method 350.1
30
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
and 353.1, RSKSOP-214v5) for all rounds of sampling. Iodide was measured using flow injection analysis
(RSKSOP-223v2) only for sampling round 3. The carbon concentrations of DIG and DOC in aqueous
samples were determined via combustion and infrared detection (US EPA Method 9060A, RSKSOP-
330vO) using a Shimadzu TOC-VCPH analyzer for all sampling rounds.
Dissolved gases (methane, ethane, propane, and butane), low-molecular-weight acids (lactate, formate,
acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, and butyrate), and the stable isotopes of water (62H, 618O) were
analyzed by Shaw Environmental/CB&l (Ada, Oklahoma). Dissolved gases were measured using gas
chromatography (Agilent Micro 3000 gas chromatograph (RSKSOP-194v4 and -175v5) for all sampling
rounds. The concentrations of low-molecular-weight acids were determined using high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Dionex ICS-3000, RSKSOP-112v6) for all sampling rounds. Hydrogen
(62H) and oxygen (618O) isotope ratios for aqueous samples collected were determined by isotope-ratio
mass spectrometry (IRMS) (RSKSOP296vl) for sampling round 2 and by cavity ring-down spectrometry
(Picarro L2120J CRDS, RSKSOP-334vO) for sampling round 3.
The analyses of DROs, GROs, and SVOCs in water samples were completed by EPA Region 8 laboratory
(Golden, Colorado) for all sampling rounds. DROs and GROs were determined by gas chromatography
(GC), using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (US EPA Method 8015B;
Agilent 6890N GC). The concentrations of SVOCs were determined by GC/mass spectrometry (GC-MS),
(US EPA Method 8270D; HP 6890 GC and HP 5975 MS).
VOCs were measured by Shaw Environmental/ CB&I (Ada, Oklahoma) for all sampling rounds. The
samples were analyzed using automated headspace GC/MS (US EPA Methods 5021A and 8260C; Agilent
6890/5973 Quadrupole GC/MS).
Both dissolved (filtered) and total (unfiltered) metal samples were analyzed by Shaw Environmental for
rounds 1 and 2. Metals were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy
(ICP-OES) for all dissolved and total metals (US EPA Methods 200.7; RSKSOP-213v4; Optima 3300 DV ICP-
OES). Unfiltered samples were prepared before analyses by microwave digestion (US EPA Method
3015A). Total and dissolved metal analyses for samples collected during sampling round 3 were
conducted by SwRI (San Antonio, Texas) in accordance with US EPA Method 6020A (inductively coupled
mass spectrometry [ICP-MS]) and US EPA Method 200.7 (ICP-OES). Unfiltered samples were digested
prior to analyses (US EPA Method 200.7). Mercury concentrations were determined by cold-vapor
atomic absorption (US EPA Method 7470A; PerkinElmer FIMS 400A).
Glycols (2-butoxyethanol, di-, tri-, and tetraethylene glycol) were measured by EPA Region 3 laboratory
in samples collected during sampling rounds 1 and 2. The samples were analyzed by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) tandem mass
spectrometry (MS/MS; Waters HPLC/MS/MS with a Waters Atlantis dC18 3u.m, 2.1 x 150 mm column).
Glycol samples for round 3 were analyzed by EPA's NERL using the same method as EPA Region 3. Over
the course of this case study, the glycol method was in development. A verification study of the method
used for glycol analysis was completed using volunteer federal, state, municipal, and commercial
analytical laboratories. The study indicated that the HPLC/MS/MS method was robust, provided good
accuracy and precision, and exhibited no matrix effects for several water types that were tested
(Schumacher and Zintek, 2014).
31
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) and rubidium (Rb) and strontium (Sr) concentrations were measured by
the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (Denver, Colorado; no EPA method) for samples collected during
sampling rounds 2 and 3. High precision (2o = +0.00002) strontium isotope ratio results were obtained
using thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) (Finnigan MAT 262 and Thermo Elemental Triton).
Acrylamide, alkylphenols, ethoxylated alkylphenols, and ethoxylated alcohols were measured by the
EPA's NERL (Las Vegas, Nevada; no EPA methods) using methods currently under development (US EPA,
2012). These were measured for a limited set of wells in round 2 and for all wells in round 3.
Detection and reporting limits for all analytes, per sample type, are provided in Tables Bl through B8 in
Appendix B.
4.4. QA/QC
Detailed information concerning QA/QC is presented in Appendix A of this report. QC samples included
blanks, field duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates. All QC sample types were collected,
preserved, and analyzed using methods identical to those used for the water samples collected in the
field (Table 4). Sample preservation and holding time criteria are listed in Table Al. Field QC samples
for ground water and surface water sampling, which included several types of blanks and duplicate
samples, are summarized in Table A2. These included several types of blanks and duplicate samples.
Adequate sample volumes were collected to allow for laboratory matrix spike samples to be prepared,
where applicable. Data were checked using the software package AqQA (version 1.1.1) for the charge
balance and measured SpC versus calculated SpC checks. First, the SpC values measured in the field
were compared with a calculated value that is based on anion- and cation-specific resistivity constants
and the measured concentrations of anions and cations in specific ground water samples. The
agreement between the measured and calculated values should be within 15%. The second method
was to calculate the charge balance for each solution. This was done by summing and comparing the
net positive and negative charge from the measured concentrations of anions and cations. The
agreement should be within 10%. Poor agreement suggests that one or more major solutes were not
accounted for in the analytical measurements or, otherwise, could point to an analytical error.
Discrepancies in this manner were either qualified or the identity of other sample components and/or
reason(s) for poor agreement was investigated (Beak, 2013). A more detailed description of the QA/QC
procedures implementation is presented in the QAPP (Beak, 2013).
Appendix A describes general QA and the results of QC sample analyses, including discussions of chain of
custody, holding times, blank results, field duplicate results, laboratory QA/QC results, data usability,
QAPP additions and deviations, field QA/QC, application of data qualifiers, tentatively identified
compounds (TICs), Audits of Data Quality (ADQ), the field Technical System Audit (TSA), and laboratory
TSAs. All reported data met project requirements unless otherwise indicated by application of data
qualifiers. In rare cases, data were rejected as unusable and not reported. Detailed information
concerning QA/QC is presented in Appendix A of this report.
4.5. Data Handling and Analysis
For each sampling location in this study, geochemical parameters and the water quality data for major-
ions and other selected inorganic ions collected over the multiple sampling rounds were averaged. This
approach ensures that more frequently sampled locations are given equivalent weight in the data
32
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
analysis (Battelle, 2013); however, a shortcoming of this method is that potential temporal variability in
concentration data at a single location is not captured. Intra-site variability of the data collected in this
study was examined by evaluating time-dependent concentration trends at specific locations. Summary
statistics were calculated for selected parameters after averaging across sampling rounds for each
location (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values). Parameters with
non-detect values were set at half the minimum detection limit; summary statistics determined for
parameters that showed mixed results, both greater than the quantitation limit (>QL) and less than the
quantitation limit ( QL were found and these detections were not consistent through
time at specific sampling locations. Stable isotope and strontium isotope data, used to identify fluid
sources and biogeochemical processes, were not averaged so that the full range of data variability could
be evaluated. Furthermore, historical sources of isotope data for the study were not available, so
weighting was not a data analysis issue.
Historical ground water data for Killdeer were collected from the NWIS (USGS, 2013), the NDWC (2013),
and Klausing (1976) databases. Secondary data from these sources were considered based upon various
evaluation criteria, such as: (1) did the organization that collected the data have a quality system in
place? (2) Were the secondary data collected under an approved QAPP or other similar planning
document? (3) Were the analytical methods used comparable to those used for the primary data? (4)
Did the analytical laboratories have demonstrated competency (such as through accreditation) for the
analysis they performed? (5) Were the data accuracy and precision control limits similar to the primary
data? (6) Are the secondary data source MDLs and QLs comparable to those associated with the
primary data or at least adequate to allow for comparisons? and (7) Were sampling methods
comparable to those used for the primary water quality data collected for this study? In general, the
necessary accompanying metadata are unavailable for the secondary water quality data sources to fully
assess these evaluation criteria; thus, the secondary data are used with the understanding that they are
of an indeterminable quality relative to the requirements specified for this study (see QAPP; Beak,
2013).
The software package AqQA (version 1.1.1) was used to evaluate internal consistency of water
compositions by calculating cation/anion balances and by comparing measured and calculated electrical
conductivity values (see Appendix A, Table A26). Major-ion charge balance was calculated by comparing
the summed milliequivalents of major cations (calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium) with major
anions (chloride, sulfate, and bicarbonate) in filtered samples using the equation:
, ,, , fn/\ locations£anions)| . .
Charge Balance (%) = 7^ xlOO (1)
5 ^ J I(2cations+£anions)I v '
The calculated charge balance error over the five sampling rounds ranged from 0.1% to 8.7% for surface
and ground water; 88% of the ground water samples collected for this study had a charge balance error
less than 5% (see Appendix A). The gypsum saturation index was determined using the Geochemist's
Workbench package (version 8; Bethke, 2008). Speciation and mineral equilibria calculations were
made by using temperature and concentrations of base species: major cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+),
33
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
anions (Cl~, SO42~, HCO3~), and pH. Activity corrections were made using the Debye-Huckel equation. The
LLNL (EQ3/6) thermodynamic database was selected for use in the calculations (Delany and Lundeen,
1990). For these calculations, charge imbalance was handled by compensating with chloride for samples
with an anion deficit or by compensating with sodium for samples with a cation deficit.
Once the databases were sorted and filtered, the data from each database were compared to identify
duplicate samples between databases. This comparison was based on the metadata provided in each
database. Based on these metadata, sampling locations within databases where duplicated were
removed.
For the historical datasets, samples with a charge balance error < 15% were used for water-type analysis
and for constructing geochemical plots such as Piper or Schoeller diagrams. In most cases, charge
balance errors exceeding the 15% criterion were due to missing concentrations of major cations or
anions in the historical datasets. Again, the historical data from locations with multiple sampling rounds
were averaged and summary statistics were determined. Charge balance criteria were not used to
screen data for use in summary statistic calculations or for plotting box-and-whisker diagrams.
Summary statistics for historical data were determined on a reduced-area basis (3-mile radius) in order
to more directly evaluate data from samples collected in nearby locations. Various issues relating to
data quality and applicability of historical data have been previously discussed (Battelle, 2013; US EPA,
2012; Beak, 2013), such as comparability of analytical methods, comparability of analytes, unknown
sample collection methods, and unavailable laboratory QC data and data-quality-related qualifiers.
While recognizing these limitations, historical data are used as the best points of reference available to
compare with the water quality data collected in this study.
Statistical evaluations were carried out using the ProUCL (US EPA, 2010b) and Statistica (version 12)
software packages. Hypothesis testing for the water quality data was performed using parametric
(ANOVA) and nonparametric (Kruskal-Wallis) methods. An assumption underlying parametric statistical
procedures is that datasets are normally distributed or can be transformed to a normally distributed
form; data transformations in some cases included logarithmic functions. For the analysis of the major-
ion trends, average values were used in the statistical tests and were combined with single observations.
As noted previously, this approach was used to avoid the undue weighting of locations sampled multiple
times, either in the new data collected for this study or in the historical water quality data. Post-hoc
tests were performed to determine significant differences among water quality datasets for particular
analytes, including the Scheffe and Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison tests. A p-value of less than 0.05
was interpreted as a significant difference between compared datasets. Because a large number of
comparisons were made between the data from this study and the historical water quality data that
encompass numerous sampling investigations, multiple locations, and extended periods of time, the
problem of multiple comparisons is suggested, that is, the increased likelihood of rejecting the null
hypothesis and flagging significant differences among datasets. Given the exploratory nature of this
study, p-value adjustments were not incorporated (e.g., Bonferroni or Sidak correction factors) and the
traditional significance threshold of 0.05 was applied for the data comparisons.
34
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
5. Historic Water Quality
5.1. National Water Information Systems (NWIS) Database
The NWIS is a large, publically available database of water quality data for the United States (USGS,
2011). Ground water data are available from the NWIS database.
Initially, the data were sorted based on whether the water was surface water or ground water. The
ground water data were then sorted according to the aquifer or formation from which the water had
been collected. Using the state well codes, the data, all prior to 1978, were refined further to water
samples that came from the Killdeer aquifer. Calculations of charge balances revealed that the charge
balances ranged from 0.04% to 4.2%. There were 25 total data points and all were useable.
5.2. North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) Database
The State of North Dakota maintains a publicly available database containing ground water quality data.
This database is maintained by the North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC, 2013). Killdeer
aquifer data were downloaded, including the calculated charge balances for all locations. Only data
prior to 1998 were used. Calculations of charge balances revealed that the charge balances ranged from
0.1% to 3.3%. All six data points were useable.
5.3. Klausing Data
Klausing (1976) published ground water data for the Killdeer aquifer in a report obtained from the North
Dakota Geological Survey. Charge balances were calculated for the data in the report and data with
charge balances greater than 15% were not considered for data comparisons. All five data points in this
report for the Killdeer aquifer were useable (charge balances ranged from 0.3% to 1.6%).
5.4. National Uranium Resources Evaluation (NURE) Database
The National Uranium Resources Evaluation (NURE) database was not used in this study because there
were no data related to the Killdeer aquifer.
5.5. Produced Water Database
The produced water database shows the concentrations of major anions and cations, pH, and total
dissolved solids (TDS) for produced water in the United States (USGS, 2002). This is a publically available
database maintained by the USGS. The USGS compiled the database from the original Department of
Energy Fossil Energy Research Center and removed redundancies, verified consistency of the data, and
added metadata (USGS, 2002). This database contained analyses of 1,210 produced waters in the
Williston Basin for North Dakota.
5.6. Limitations to the Determination of Background Using Historical Data
Using historical data to determine background water quality has several limitations (Battelle, 2013;
Reimann et al., 2008; Matschullar et al., 2000; Bowen et al., 2015). Battelle (2013) discussed the
importance of taking into consideration the quality assurance (QA) and sample collection methods in
regards to the use of secondary data and the intended purpose of the database being considered. For
example, EPA STOrage and RETrieval (STORET) database was excluded because it contains samples that
were used for regulatory purposes and thus represents impaired waters rather than background data. It
35
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
is not known how or if the NWIS and NDWC databases screened sampling locations for potential
contamination. Therefore, it is possible that these databases also contain data that are not background.
Other potential limitations of the databases include the following: they may not have the appropriate
spatial distribution of sampling points or temporal distribution of sampling events needed; they may
lack data on trace organic compounds; and they may lack geochemical or isotopic indicators (Bowen et
al., 2015). Bowen et al. (2015) also indicated that many of the watersheds where current hydrocarbon
exploration is occurring had severely degraded water prior to 1972 and, since 1972, have experienced
improvements in water quality. This causes the comparisons to historical data to be more difficult and
not straightforward.
36
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
6. State-Commissioned Monitoring Data at the Killdeer
Retrospective Case Study Location
The state of North Dakota directed the operator of the Franchuk well to initiate site remediation efforts
and ground water monitoring immediately after the blowout occurred. The operator and the contractor
proposed a Remedial Investigation Work Plan that was finalized in March 2011 (Terracon, 2011a). This
document provided information on background and scope of work, the analytical parameters to be
measured and a proposed sampling schedule for the remediation efforts and ground water sampling
(Terracon, 2011a). In addition, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and a Quality Assurance Project
Plan (QAPP) were provided to the state for the Remedial Investigation Work Plan sampling in a separate
document (Terracon, 2011b). The QAPP was finalized in March 2011 and contained information for the
project organization and responsibilities; QA objectives for measurement of data; sampling procedures;
custody procedures; instrument calibration procedures and frequency; analytical procedures; quality
control checks; data reduction, validation and reporting procedures; performance and system audits;
preventive maintenance; specific routine procedures to assess data precision, accuracy, and
completeness; and corrective actions. EPA used similar data collection activities at this retrospective
case study.
The state-commissioned data collected were provided to EPA in spring 2013. Because of the greater
sampling frequency, these data could be compared with the results of EPA study data and used to
potentially fill in data gaps in study data (e.g., time trend analyses). A summary of the state-
commissioned data is presented in Appendix D.
37
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
7. Water Quality Results from this Study
The following sections describe results and interpretations of the water-quality testing conducted in this
case study, including: geochemical parameters, major cations, major anions, manganese, and iron;
geochemical parameters (pH and SpC); dissolved gases; organic parameters; and isotopes. Analytical
data obtained during the three sampling rounds are provided in the tables in Appendix B.
7.1. Initial Study Data Screening
Figure 9 shows the ranges of the major anions and major cations. NDGW07 and NDGW08 are outliers
when compared with other site wells and historical data for the majority of parameters (chloride,
calcium, magnesium, and sodium). This is a strong indication that NDGW07 and NDGW08 demonstrated
potential impacts on ground water quality. It should be noted that other study wells for parameters
shown in Figure 10 are also outside the historical data ranges; however, there is no pattern that suggests
impacts on ground water quality. In addition, drilling records for NDGW09 indicate that NDGW09 is
partially or entirely screened in the underlying Sentinel Butte aquifer, so differences in water quality
compared with historical data or other study wells screened in the Killdeer aquifer would be expected.
A Piper diagram of the study data is provided in Figure 10. This Piper diagram also indicates that the
water quality in NDGW07 and NDGW08 differs from the other study wells, with the exception of the
October 2012 NDGW06 sample. The anion trilinear plot indicates that NDGW07 and NDGW08 are
enriched with chloride compared with other study wells. This chloride enrichment is also indicated for
the October 2012 NDGW06 sample. The mixing diamond on the Piper diagram also indicates that
NDGW07 and NDGW08 (black dashed area on plot) are enriched with respect to sulfate + chloride and
slightly enriched with respect to calcium + magnesium. Unlike the trilinear plot, the mixing diamond
does not indicate that the October 2012 NDGW06 sample differs from the other study wells.
The differences in water quality in NDGW07 and NDGW08 are shown for the following parameters:
chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and strontium. These wells are potentially impacted (see the
Specific Focus Topics- NDGW07 and NDGW08 section of this report for further discussion). The
parameters for other study wells, with a few exceptions, appear to be similar. This similarity indicates
that these wells most likely are not impacted and thus are discussed in relationship to historical
background in the next section.
7.2. Comparisons with Historical Data
As noted previously, the October 2012 NDGW06 sample appeared to be different from the other study
wells. To determine if the October 2012 NDGW06 sample was an outlier, a Q-test (Dean and Dixon,
1951; Rorabacher, 1991) was used to determine if this sample was indeed an outlier. The Q-test
analysis shows that only chloride for the October 2012 sample for NDGW06 was an outlier (Table 7).
The state-commissioned data also showed an elevated concentration of chloride in the October 2012
NDGW06 sample. Other samples collected prior to the October 2012 state-commissioned data for
NDGW06 were consistently lower and not outliers. Based on the study data collected by EPA and the
state, it cannot be determined whether the October 2012 sample for NDGW06 represents an anomalous
sampling point or indicates that NDGW06 is showing that contamination is occurring. However, the
October 2012 sample for NDGW06 should not be consider reflective of unimpacted conditions in
succeeding discussions, rather it should be considered undetermined. It is also important to note that
this data point for the October 2012 sample will be used for future analysis in this report.
38
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Chloride
Calcium
NDGW16-
NDGW15-
NDGW14-
NDGW13-
NDGW12-
NDGW1 1 -
NDGW10-
NDGW09-
NDGW08
NDGW07-
NDGW06-
NDGW05-
NDGW04-
NDGWD3-
NDGWD2-
NDGW01 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
^^^^^^^5
I
I
I
I
I
500
1000 1500 2000
Chloride (mg/L)
Magnesium
2500
3000
NDGW16-
NDGW15-
NDGW14-
NDGW13-
NDGW12-
NDGW1 1 -
NDGW10-
MDGW09-
NDGW08
NUCiWU/-
NDG'/V06-
NDGW05-
NDGW04-
NDGW03-
NDG>/V02-
NDGW01 -
^
I
I
I
I
I
1
j
1
1
|
|
1
50 100 150 200
Magnesium (mg/L)
250
300
NDGW16-
NDGW15-
NDGW14-
NDGW13-
NDGW12-
NDGW11-
NDGW10-
NDGW09-
NDGWOS -
NDGW07-
NDGW06-
NDGW05-
NDGW04-
NDGW03-
NDGW02-
ND3W01 -
^
|
I
I
I
I
1
[
^^^^^^^^
1
1
1
1
100
200 300 400
500
600
Calcium (mg/L)
Sodium
NDGW16-
NDGW15-
NDGW14-
NDGW13-
NDGW12-
NDC-W11 -
NDGWIO-
NDGW09-
NDGW08-
NDGVi/07 -
NDGW06-
NDGW05-
NDGWM-
NDGW03-
ND6W02-
NDGW01 -
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
|
^^^^^^f^^^gj^^^^^f
BiHHI
g
1
f
1
1
I
400 600 600
Sodium (mg/L)
12CO
Figure 9. Plots showing data ranges for the Killdeer retrospective case study wells. Yellow shaded areas indicate historical data ranges based on data obtained
from Klausing (1979), NWIS and NWDC. Black bars are the observed concentration ranges for each well, collected by US EPA, during the study. (Data Sources:
USGS (2013) and NDWC (2013)).
39
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
20%
80%
60% *fc
Legend
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
* NDGW07
* NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW10
0 NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
40%
\
A20%
%
<§>
%,
^
o o
Ca
0\° 0\° 0\° 0\°
^ ^ eg5 £>
Cl »
Figure 10. Piper diagram showing all the study data collected at the Killdeer retrospective case study. Dashed areas indicate samples that appear to be outliers
from other study wells.
40
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
120-
100-
J 80-
O)
0) 60-
0)
CD
££ 40-
20-
0-
mnn
900-
800-
700-
E 600-
g1 500-
CO
01 400
300-
200-
100
Calcium
T * rV- T *
I , ,
* 7 * » *
»«* , i «»«
TT : ^4* ^^
n= 5 n= 6 n=18 n= 13
Klausing NDWC NWIS Study
Bicarbonate
T - T - I '
T » *.*
i I ;
*«*
* * «»» * »
H-1***
I »*
1 . X *
n= 5 n=6 n=18 n=13
Klausing NDWC NWIS Study
40-
_J
E
cu 20-
0)
CD
OL
0-
9-
8-
7-
F 6-
0)
c 5-
ro
3-
2-
-i
Chloride
T »
T
n=2 n=6 n= 18 n=13
Klausing NDWC NWIS Study
Potassium
T *
- t t »
*
» » «
« «
i ' * * 1 ** *
A 1 1 «
-L «
n=5 n=6 n= 18 n=13
Klausing NDWC NWIS Study
Figure 11. Statistical plots comparing study data (excluding NDGW07 and NDGW08) with historical data within a 3-mile radius of the
Franchuk 44-20 SWH well. (Data Sources: Klausing (1979), NDWC (2013), and USGS (2013)).
41
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
E
CD
o>
nj
o:
40-
30-
?(1-
10-
0-
n=
5
i>
T
i
n=
Magnesium
*
T *»
' I'
: yv>
6 n=18
«
»
H~i *»
*»
:
n=13
E
o>
cn
c
05
400-
300-
200-
100-
0-
*
, J
n= 5 r
Sodium
n*** T
i
1= 6 n=
*
«*
»«»*»
8
+
»
r
r
«
»
= 13
Klausing NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing NDWC
NWIS
Study
700-
600-
_, 500-
E 400-
CD
g5 300-
cc
* 200-
100-
0-
Sulfate
T ' JL* T * T
JL
. T ' -r-
J» * I ,
n=5 n= 6 n= 18 n=
»
*
» »
V
#»
3
2200-
2000-
1800-
£ 1600-
W 1400-
U 1200-
? 1000-
C£ 800-
600-
400-
200-
n.
T
n=
Specific Con
T '.
, I.
5 n=6
ductivity
K-
T^
n=18
T *
*
i *:
n=13
Klausing NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC NWIS
Study
Figure 11 continued. Statistical plots comparing study data (excluding NDGW07 and NDGW08) with historical data within a 3-mile
radius of the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well. (Data Sources: Klausing (1979), NDWC (2013), and USGS (2013)).
42
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 6. Data comparisons and statistical summaries for study data (excluding NDGW07 and NDGW08) and historical data within a 3-mile radius of the
Franchuk 44-20 SWH well.
Data Source
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Parameter
SPC
SPC
SPC
SPC
Bicarbonate
Bicarbonate
Bicarbonate
Bicarbonate
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Calcium
Calcium
Calcium
Calcium
Units
U.S/CIT1
u.S/cm
u.S/cm
u.S/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Mean
1144
1350
1061
1245
528
613
521
532
4.7
3.9
4.9
11.7
200
260
155
221
45
47
34
53.8
Median
867
1378
979
1041
488
598
482
507
4.7
4.0
3.1
3.78
108
222
118
182
49
46
30
47.2
Standard
Deviation
488
315
388
444
137
119
146
128
2.3
0.8
5.9
14.9
166
147
110
159
23
21
16
23.6
Min
744
824
482
765
405
495
287
338
3.1
3.1
2.5
0.76
70
68
33
76.5
16
23
15
31.9
Max
1730
1750
1730
2133
710
793
793
832
6.3
4.9
25
47.1
439
500
439
637
73
75
73
105
Locations1
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
N2
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
2
6
14
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
Z3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 6. Data comparisons and statistical summaries for study data (excluding NDGW07 and NDGW08) and historical data within a 3-mile radius of the
Franchuk 44-20 SWH well.
Data Source
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Klausing
NDWC
NWIS
Study
Parameter
Potassium
Potassium
Potassium
Potassium
Magnesium
Magnesium
Magnesium
Magnesium
Sodium
Sodium
Sodium
Sodium
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Mean
4.5
5.2
4.5
4.60
17
23
16
20.0
207
256
198
193
Median
3.7
4.5
4.1
4.62
11
19
15
17.4
169
277
178
176
Standard
Deviation
1.4
1.8
1.6
1.20
11
13
7.4
12.4
105
65
85
85.8
Min
3.1
2.9
2.4
2.84
6.6
9
6.6
1.11
75
170
72
26
Max
6.1
7.4
8
6.78
30
41
30
42.8
328
316
328
364
Locations1
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
N2
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
5
6
18
13
Z3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of unique sampling points contained in the data base.
Number of sampling points that contains data for the parameter.
Percentage of left censored data.
44
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 7. Results of Q-test to determine if a parameter is an outlier for NDGW06.
Parameter
SPC
Bicarbonate
Chloride
Sulfate
Calcium
Potassium
Magnesium
Sodium
Strontium
Boron
Barium
DOC
Gap
108
48
112.2
63.5
1.3
0.21
0.9
15
13
2
4
0.75
Range
435
88
112.6
94.5
9.8
0.58
3.6
32
78
15
12
1.03
Q1
0.25
0.54
0.996
0.67
0.13
0.36
0.25
0.47
0.17
0.13
0.33
0.73
Critical Value2
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.97
Outlier3
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Q statistic is calculated by Q=Gap/Range.
2 Critical values were determined as in Rorabacher (1991) at the 95% confidence level.
3 If Q> critical value, then it is an outlier.
7.3. Other Parameters
7.3.1. Dissolved Gases
The dissolved gases analyzed as part of this case study were methane, ethane, propane, and butane.
The NWDC and the NWIS databases and the data presented in Klausing (1976) did not include these as
part of their suite of analyses. However, a report on field screening for shallow gas was available to use
as a comparison (Anderson et al., 2010).
Over the course of the study there were no detectable concentrations of propane or butane. Out of the
31 total samples collected during the study, 10 had detectable concentrations of methane, and all of
these were detected in the October 2011 sampling round. The methane concentrations ranged from
0.0004 to 0.0253 mg/L, with a median concentration of 0.0049 mg/L. Anderson et al. (2010) screened
27 observation wells in Dunn County and only five of the wells had detectable methane, which ranged
from 0.0149 to 0.3978 mg/L. All methane detections in Anderson et al. (2010) were in the central part
of Dunn County in the Killdeer aquifer and the Sentinel Butte-Tongue River aquifer. The information
presented in Anderson et al. (2010) indicates that the detected methane concentrations in the study are
likely representative of the background conditions of the Killdeer aquifer.
7.3.2. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
The NWIS and the NDWC databases and Klausing (1976) did not contain data on VOCs, so comparisons
with study data were not possible. Acetone, TBA, benzene, toluene, m+p xylene, o-xylene, 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene, and 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene were the VOCs that had detectable concentrations in the
samples collected.
45
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
One well with detectable VOCs (NDGW10) is upgradient of the blowout site. In the July 2011 sampling
round, acetone (80.3 micrograms per liter [u.g/L]), benzene (3.77 u.g/L), and toluene (0.45 u.g/L) were
detected. These compounds were not detected in subsequent sampling rounds. The probable source of
these compounds was the PVC cement used during well pump replacement the day prior to sampling
and is not related to the blowout at the Franchuk well. However, the data collected during the study
does not rule out other sources of contamination.
Well NDGW04, downgradient of the Franchuk wells, also had detectable levels of VOCs in the October
2011 sampling round: benzene (0.20 u.g/L), m+p-xylene (0.59 u.g/L), o-xylene (0.50 u.g/L), 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene (0.39 u.g/L), and 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (0.26 u.g/L). Benzene, m+p-xylene, 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene, and 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene were qualified with a "J" qualifier, which means that the
concentration was > MDL and
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
plastics, surface coatings, detergents, and soaps (Griffiths et al., 1985; Harris et al., 1998; Wess et al.,
1998; Stiles et al., 2008; Serodio and Nogueira, 2006; Teil et al., 2013).
During this study, 80 of the 84 SVOCs compounds analyzed for were not detected. The SVOCs that were
detected included: 2-butoxyethanol, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and di-n-
butyl phthalate. However, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and di-n-butyl
phthalate are ubiquitous in the environment and are therefore not useful in determining whether
impacts occurred or in identifying a source of contamination (Griffiths et al., 1985; Stiles et al., 2008;
Serodio and Nogueira, 2006; Teil et al., 2013). These compounds are considered common laboratory
contaminants (WDNR, 2002; Miller, 2015). The 2-butoxyethanol was detected only in the July 2011
sampling round; however, the data were qualified because of blank contamination in field blanks (see
Appendix A) and were not reliable. Because there were no other detections of 2-butoxyethanol in
subsequent sampling rounds, and because it was not listed as a component of the hydraulic fracturing
fluid used (Table 1), the 2-butoxyethanol detected in the July 2011 was likely due to contamination in
the sampling equipment or sampling containers because it is used commonly in soaps and detergents
(Harris et al., 1998; Wess et al., 1998).
7.3.5. Diesel Range Organic Compounds/ Gasoline Range Organic Compounds (DRO/GRO)
DROs and GROs were used to screen for petroleum contamination in this study. The summary of all the
data collected for DROs and GROs is presented in Table B5, Appendix B.
One sample in the July 2011 sampling round (NDGW10) had detectable GRO (77.9 u.g/L); this was the
same sample with detectable VOCs. The GRO detected in this sample was possibly from the well pump
replacement the day before the sampling. NDGW03 and NDGW04 had detectable GRO (20.9 and 23.6
u.g/L, respectively) during the October 2011 sampling round. NDGW04 had detectable VOCs during this
sampling round. As noted in the VOC discussion, this GRO is likely due to contamination during
sampling. GRO was not detected in the October 2012 sampling round.
DRO was detected in all sampling rounds during this study. During the July 2011 and October 2011
sampling rounds, all samples, with the exception of NDGW02, had detectable DRO. However, most
samples for the July 2011 sampling round were qualified because of field blanks (see Appendix A). In the
October 2012 sampling round, the following wells were found to have detectable DRO: NDGW01,
NDGW04, NDGW06, NDGW07, NDGW08, NDGW09, and NDGW14. For the most part, all the wells had
similar concentrations (Killdeer aquifer wells ranged from 25.1 to 92.2 u.g/L), regardless of whether they
were upgradient, downgradient, or on the well pad. This indicates that DRO detections were likely from
a naturally occurring source and would be the background range for the Killdeer aquifer.
7.4. Summary of Water Quality Results
Two study wells, NDGW07 and NDGW08, consistently differed from the historical background data and
unimpacted well data for chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium and strontium. The major anion and
cation chemistry of NDGW07 and NDGW08 were different than the unimpacted wells. On a local scale
other parameters such as manganese were different from the local historical wells and unimpacted
wells. The only detections of TBA were in NDGW07 and NDGW08. It appears likely that NDGW07 and
NDGW08 have been impacted. The hydrology at the pad site would suggest that the Franchuk well
blowout is a likely source of the impacts. Further analysis of the potential impacts on NDGW07 and
NDGW08 are described in the next section.
47
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
8. Specific Focus Topics - NDGW07 and NDGW08
8.1. Hydrology Results from this Study
Synchronous depths to water in site monitoring wells were measured before sampling. Potentiometric
surface maps were prepared using the relative reference elevations and depth-to-water measurements
obtained on July 18, 2011 and October 17, 2011 (Table 8). Figure 12 illustrates the southerly ground
water flow direction on July 18, 2011 and a similar ground water flow direction during October 2011
(ground water flow direction is perpendicular to the hydraulic gradient). This is similar to information in
a report that was provided to EPA by the state of North Dakota (Terracon, 2013).
Table 8. Potentiometric surface elevations relative to survey datum (ft).
Well
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
July 18, 2011
(ft)
69.49
68.70
68.91
68.65
68.97
69.01
68.84
October 17, 2011
(ft)
69.86
69.62
69.68
69.61
69.73
69.72
69.68
8.2. Brine as a Potential Source of Contamination
The elevated SpC and chloride concentrations found in NDGW07 and NDGW08 would suggest that brine
intrusion may be responsible. The brine signature suggested in NDGW07 and NDGW08 is further
demonstrated by brine differentiation plots (Figure 13 and Figure 14; Hounslow 1995). Brine
differentiation plots can be used to screen samples for the potential brine impacts, but it should be
noted that not all of the elements used are conservative species (calcium, sodium and sulfate) and may
be subject to other chemical processes such as cation exchange and precipitations reactions. On
Figures 13 and 14, the red area is where Hounslow (1995) would predict brines to plot out, and the blue
area would be where brines would be expected to plot based on the UGSS produced water data base
(2002) for the Williston Basin. As can be seen in Figure 13, the produced water data for the formations
in Dunn County have some differences and not all the brines would plot in the region predicted by
Hounslow (1995). Figure 14 demonstrates that the unimpacted study wells do not plot in the regions
expected for potentially brine-impacted water, whereas most of the samples taken for NDGW07 and
NDGW08 do plot in the regions expected for brine-impacted water. (Samples for NDGW07 and
NDGW08 that do not plot in this region are discussed below in the "Time Trends" section.)
Plots of TDS versus the ratio of chloride to the sum of anions (Cl/Zanions) have been suggested as a
means of distinguishing water that is derived from precipitation, water-rock interactions, and water
derived from brine sources (Hounslow, 1995). Such a plot for the Killdeer study is shown in Figure 15.
From this plot it can be seen that the unimpacted wells all plot in the cyan-colored field, which suggests
48
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
625800
O>
.£ 625400
tr
o
625000
625800
1396800
c
o
625000
1397200
1397600
1396800
1397200
1397600
Easting (ft) Easting (ft)
Figure 12. Relative potentiometric surface maps based on relative Top-of-Casing (TOC) survey of site wells. (A) July 18, 2011 and (B) October 17, 2011.
Sampling locations are indicated on the figure using black triangles. Contour intervals are 0.05 ft.
49
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
03
O
03
o
Legend
Hounslow Brine Field
USGS Produced Water Field
^K Tyler
Madison
^ Three Forks/ Sanish
Birdbear
^- Duperow
)e Interlake
^ Red River
Bakken
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Na
Na+CI
Figure 13. Brine differentiation plot showing how the different hydrocarbon-producing brines formation in Dunn County, North Dakota plot
compared with the region predicted by Hounslow (1995). Area highlighted in red represents the brine field suggested by Hounslow (1995) and
the blue area represents the brines of the Williston Basin from the USGS (2002) database. (Sources: USGS, 2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston
etal., 2012; USGS, 2013).
50
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
03
O
^
O
CO
+
cu
O
Legend
Hounslow Brine Field
USGS Produced Water
1
A
A
A
*
*
1
A
A
A
A
A
A
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
£
A
A
&
^r
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Na
Na+CI
Figure 14. Brine differentiation plot showing the study data collected by EPA as part of this study and the state-commissioned data. Area highlighted in
red represents the brine field suggested by Hounslow (1995) and the blue area represents the brines of the Williston Basin from the USGS (2002)
database. Wells NDGW07 and NDGW08 initially plotted within the brine fields and other wells plotted outside the brine fields, indicating that NDGW07
and NDGW08 were chemically different (possible brine contamination) than the other wells.
51
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
CD
5
_C
O
&
c
g
'c
<
[X|
0
i .u -
0.9-
0.8-
.
0.7-
0.6-
0.5-
0.4-
0.3-
0.2-
0.1-
n n_
i
1
*« July 2011- >*
--I
i
i October 2011 ->*
L J.
V
**
t
October 201 2
" \
*
*± ^
zi^jc
Lege
A
A
A
A
A
A
^&
*
*
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW09
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
NDGW07
NDGW08
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
IDS (mg/L)
Figure 15. Plot of total dissolved solids (IDS) versus chloride/Zanions for the Killdeer retrospective case study. Green area = water derived from
precipitation, cyan area = water derived from water rock interactions, orange area = water derived from Williston Basin brines. Initially samples from
NDGW01 and NDGW08 demonstrated brine-like character; later NDGW07 and NDGW08 was more like water derived from water rock interactions.
(Source: Hounslow, 1995; USGS, 2002).
52
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
that the water from these wells is derived from water-rock interactions, as would be expected.
NDGW07 and NDGW08 appear to have water that is of brine origin at times and at other times appears
to be similar to water derived from water-rock interactions. (Samples for NDGW07 and NDGW08 that
plot outside the brine field are discussed below in the "Time Trends" section.)
Figure 16 shows plots of log chloride plotted against calcium, magnesium, and strontium and a plot of
log sodium/chloride versus log calcium/chloride. These plots indicate that for NDGW07 and NDGW08,
the data lie between the formation waters and the unimpacted wells. This is similar to what Stoessell
(1997) found when he plotted chloride against sodium, iodide, calcium, potassium, magnesium, and
strontium in Louisiana. In all cases the monitoring well concentrations in this study were between the
background concentrations and the Wilcox or Sparta brine data (Stoessell, 1997). Stoessell (1997) used
this as one line of evidence that the monitoring wells had been impacted by brine.
Plots of SpC versus a parameter can also be used to identify water that is potentially impacted by brines.
Figure 17 shows SpC plotted against chloride, bicarbonate, magnesium, and sodium. Again, the data in
Figure 17 for NDGW07 and NDGW08 are intermediate to the unimpacted wells and formation brines
that could potentially impact NDGW07 and NDGW08. This is consistent with the water in NDGW07 and
NDGW08 potentially being a mixture of formation water and water from the Killdeer aquifer. Panno et
al. (2006) used plots of SpC against chloride to help distinguish between pristine ground water and
ground water that has been affected by road salt.
Iodide also can be used to indicate waters that are potentially impacted by brines (Howard and Beck,
1993; Stoessell, 1997; Panno et al., 2006; Harkness et al., 2015). Iodide was measured only during the
final sampling round in this case study and was not detected in any of the unimpacted wells. However,
iodide was detected in both NDGW07 and NDGW08, above the quantification limit. Figure 18 shows a
plot of log chloride concentration versus log iodide concentrations. Because the unimpacted wells had
no detectable iodide, the point on this plot representing the unimpacted wells is one-half the MDL for
iodide and the one-half the median chloride concentration. NDGW07 and NDGW08 plot between the
unimpacted wells and that of the formation brines (Figure 18). This also points to formation brine as the
source of impacts on NDGW07 and NDGW08. Road salt could also be a potential source of the impacts
observed and is discussed below in the "Source Delineation" section.
Lithium has also been suggested as a potential indicator of brine impacts on ground water (Fontes and
Matray, 1993a; Fontes and Matray, 1993b; Bottomley et al., 2003; Hancini and Oelkers, 2011). Lithium
was only analyzed in the final round of sampling. As is shown on Figure 19, the impacted wells fall
between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine data. This would also indicate the potential
source for the impacts seen in NDGW07 and NDGW08 are from a brine source.
8.3. Time Trends
Changes in concentrations of a parameter with time can indicate transport of contaminant in an aquifer
(Perez Guerrero et al., 2010; Olayiwola et al., 2013; Perez Guerrero et al., 2013). Figure 20 shows the
changes in chloride concentrations over time. (Time zero is the date of the Franchuk well blowout.) Also
shown in Figure 20 are data provided by the state to EPA (dashed lines). The state collected data before
EPA sampling and more frequently. In general, the concentrations of chloride in the state data agree
with EPA chloride data when split sampling was performed. Chloride concentrations in the unimpacted
wells were fairly consistent, and there was very little difference in concentrations of chloride in the
53
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
E
2
'u
/S 2^
O)
o
1-
O)
E
2
o
55
D)
1234
log Chloride (mg/L)
t-
-1
-
1
1! 3"
E
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
O)
E
CD
c
o
-2
CD
en
o
A
O)
cn
1234
log SPC (uS/cm)
1 -
Qi i
5-1
=? 4-i
-0 '-
_O 2-.
.c I
D) 1
.9 E
0-i
6.0-
5.5-
~ 5.0-
'a 45-
§- 4.0-
1 3^
? 30-
0) 25-
0
20-
i ^
^3ffi*
. )K^*^iW
&
0123456
log SPC (|.iS/cm)
D
^ a^l
X
Legend
A NDGW01
A NDGW02
A NDGW03
A NDGW04
NDGW05
A NDGW06
* NDGW07
* NDGW08
A NDGW09
A NDGW10
A NDGW11
A NDGW14
A NDGW15
A NDGW16
A NDGW01S
A NDGW02S
NDGW03S
A NDGW04S
NDGW05S
& NDGW06S
* NDGW07S
w NDGW08S
- NDGW09S
X Bakken
X Tyler
Madison
X Three Forks/ Sanish
Bird bear
X Duperow
X Interlake
Red River
log SPC (uS/cm)
log SPC (jiS/cm)
Figure 17. Plots of log specific conductivity (SpC) versus log parameter. (A) log bicarbonate, (B) log chloride, (C) log magnesium, and (D) log sodium. Sample
locations ending in an "S" represent state commissioned samples, samples not ending in an "S" represent data collected by US EPA. Gray shaded area
represents possible mixture of Sentinel Butte aquifer water with Killdeer aquifer water. Yellow shaded area represents unimpacted study wells. In all cases
data from NDGW07 and NDGW08 lie outside the unimpacted wells and between the unimpacted wells and the formation brines. (Source: USGS, 2002;
Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
55
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
.-^»
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
4.0-
3.5-
«.
li ;
Z,3.0-
D)
O
2.5-
2.0-
-
^
^ /r*
Xl/ ^ '
A. Unimpacted ^ ^ /T" .-'
^ NDGW07 ^IZxj-V;-/
-^ NDGW08 ^
Nj/ Bakken -v^
^ Madison
Birdbear ^^
^ Duperow
^ Interlake \ijJE^'
Red River
Bakken Trend M|
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow Trend
Interlake Trend
Red River Trend
12345
log Sodium (mg/L)
Figure 19. Log sodium concentrations versus log Na/Li showing study data and formation water brines in which hydrocarbon production occurred in Dunn
County. Wells NDGW07 and NDGW08 appear to be the result of mixing between the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water and the formation brines underlying
the Killdeer Case Study Location. (Source: USGS, 2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
57
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
unimpacted wells, as indicated by the yellow shaded areas. For NDGW07 and NDGW08, chloride
concentrations increased significantly from background, peaked, and then steadily decreased with time,
approaching background concentrations by the end of the study. The chloride peak in well NDGW08,
which is closest to the Franchuk well (approximately 4.5 m), arrived earlier than the chloride peak in
NDGW07 (approximately 12.8 m from the Franchuk well [see Figure 20]). The chloride peak at NDGW08
is much narrower than at NDGW07, and at NDGW08, peak chloride concentration is higher than at
NDGW07. This is likely due to dispersion of chloride during transport. As the chloride moves from its
source, it gradually spreads out three-dimensionally, which would cause a reduction in the
concentration of chloride at a given monitoring point further down gradient. In addition, dispersion
would cause the chloride plume to become spatially bigger, thus increasing the time it would take to
move past a point farther away from the source. Similar relationships were exhibited by other inorganic
parameters. These examples would be consistent with a plume moving through the Killdeer aquifer
(Perez Guerrero et al., 2010; Olayiwola et al., 2013; Perez Guerrero et al., 2013).
In the case of tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), there were not enough data to plot, and the detection limits for
TBA were much higher in the state-commissioned data than in EPA data; and the state had one date
with detectable TBA in their samples. Therefore, only data collected by EPA were used (Figure 21).
There is clearly a time trend in the TBA data from NDGW07 and NDGW08 samples when compared with
the unimpacted well data. Samples from the unimpacted wells consistently indicated no detectable
TBA; however, there were always detectable concentrations of TBA in NDGW07 and NDGW08. The
concentration of TBA in NDGW08, the monitoring well closest to the Frankchuk well, decreased with
time, with the peak concentration of TBA likely occurring between the first and second round of
sampling and the tail of the plume between the second and third rounds of sampling. NDGW07 is
farther downgradient of the Franchuk well. The peak concentration for NDGW07 likely occurred
around the second sampling round and then decreased before the third round of sampling. It is very
likely, based on these data that the TBA time trend represents a plume moving through the aquifer
(Perez Guerrero et al., 2010; Olayiwola et al., 2013; Perez Guerrero et al., 2013).
Because no additional samples have been taken since the October 2012 sampling round, it is not known
if NDGW07 or NDGW08 returned to unimpacted concentrations or how long it will take to reach
unimpacted conditions in these wells. However, using the conservative element chloride and the state-
provided data for NDGW08 (Figure 22), an estimate can be made. As shown in Figure 22, the chloride
concentration in the tail of the peak for NDGW08 had seven points that could be used to estimate how
long it would take for the water in NDGW08 to reach the secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL)
for chloride, mean and median unimpacted concentration of chloride using data from the unimpacted
wells. First it is important to point out that the tail of the NDGW08 chloride peak is similar to a first
order kinetic (exponential) decay relationship. Therefore, a pseudo-first order kinetic decay model was
applied to the data collected for chloride. Figure 22A is a plot of time versus the natural log of the
chloride concentration and, as can be seen, this is a roughly linear relationship with an r2= 0.985, which
means that a pseudo-first order kinetic decay model would be appropriate. Applying this model to the
actual data is shown in Figure 22B, and as can be seen the model fits the actual data fairly well. The
model was used to estimate the time it would take to reach the chloride SMCL (738 days), the mean
unimpacted chloride concentration (1,246 days), and the median unimpacted chloride concentration
(1,433 days). Because of the lack of data points after the peak in NDGW07 the same analysis cannot be
performed.
58
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
4000
3500 :
3000^
5* 2500^
^ 2000:
CD
^ 1500H
O
1000^
500^
0-
Legend
-0-NDGW02
-- NDGW03
-0-NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
-Q- NDGW01 State
-Q- NDGW02 State
-O NDGW03 State
-O- NDGW04 State
NDGW05 State
-Q- NDGW06 State
-fa- NDGW07 State
-fa- NDGW08 State
-Q- NDGW09 State
-O NDGW10 State
-O NDGW11 State
-O- NDGW12State
NDGW13State
NDGW14State
-Q- NDGW15State
NDGW16State
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (days)
Figure 20. Time trend data for chloride study data and data provided by the state. Solid lines = study data, dashed lines = state-provided data and yellow
shaded area represents unimpacted wells. The data suggest a plume moving through NDGW07 and NDGW08.
59
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
1000
900
800
^ 700
5 60°
O 500
o
03 400
300
200
£ 100
0-
Legend
-0-NDGW01
-0- NDGW02
-0- NDGW03
-- NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
- NDGW08
- NDGW09
-NDGW10
-NDGW11
-NDGW12
-NDGW13
-NCX3W14
NDGW15
NDGW16
**
I I I
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (days)
Figure 21. Time trend data for tert-butyl alcohol (TBA). Yellow shaded area represents unimpacted wells. The limited tert-butyl
alcohol data suggest a potential plume moving through NDGW07 and NDGW08.
60
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
O)
A
Chloride
Fit
n Cl = -0.00603xtime + 9.97
r*= 0.985
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (days)
tuuu
^3500-
"3^000-
§2500-
-§2000-
01500-
giooo-
500-
0-
B ^ -^--Chloride
^ Fit
\
\\
^Xx
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
8.4. Source of the Brine
8.4.1. Out-of-Zone Fracturing
Research into out-of-zone hydraulic fracturing of the Bakken formation indicated that a large number of
wells contain water that is external to the Bakken Zone (Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2012; Peterman et al.,
2012; Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2013). Out-of-zone hydraulic fracturing is defined as the propagation of
fractures outside the production zone into adjacent formations (Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2013). The
co-produced water comes from the adjacent, saturated carbonate aquifers (Arkadakshiy and Rostron,
2012; Peterman et al., 2012; Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2013). Arkadakshiy and Rostron (2013) found up
to 70% of the Bakken wells contained external water. The Bakken wells that contained external water
were found to all contain water from the Mississippian Lodgepole formation (part of the Madison
Group). Water from the underlying Birdbear/Nisku zone was detected in a small number of these
wells6 out of 358 wells (Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2013). The average volume of external water was
34%, and the external water volume ranged from 10% to 100% (Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2013).
Based on this information it appears that any analysis of sources of brine impacts should also include
analysis of other formations (see Figure 23). Based on the above discussion on out-of-zone fracturing
and the information presented in Figure 23, the likely formations for out-of-zone fracturing would be
the Madison group, the Three Forks formation, and the Jefferson Group (Birdbear and Duperow
Formations). Data were obtained for these formations as well as the Interlake, Red River, and Tyler
Formations, also in Dunn County, for the source delineation analysis, which will be discussed in the next
section.
8.4.2. Source Delineation
Techniques such as the use of correlation plots and ratios can be used to indicate or fingerprint brines
(Leonard and Ward, 1962; Howard and Beck, 1993; Stoessell, 1997; Davis et al., 1998; Vengosh and
Pankratov, 1998; Hudak and Wachal, 2001; Hudak, 2003; Panno et al., 2006; Freeman, 2007; Katz et al.,
2011; Hudak, 2012; Harkness et al., 2015).
Log chloride versus log calcium, log magnesium, and log strontium plots as well as log sodium/chloride
versus log calcium/chloride plots are shown on Figure 24. Also shown on Figure 24 are trend lines
representing the 1:1 dilution between the median unimpacted well concentrations and the median
concentrations of the various brine formation waters. With the exception of the Three Forks/ Sanish
trend line in the log chloride versus log magnesium (Figure 24B), these trends are very similar in all other
cases, with slight differences in slopes. The data from the impacted wells, NDGW07 and NDGW08,
however, do not fall on the trend lines for calcium and strontium and have lower cation concentrations
than would be predicted by a simple 1:1 dilution of formation water with the unimpacted wells (Figures
24A and 24C). This is not unexpected because the cations calcium and strontium are not conservative
species. This means that other geochemical processes (precipitation, cation exchange, complexation,
etc.) can alter the concentrations of the cations during transport in the aquifer and/or to the aquifer.
For magnesium (Figure 24B) many data points for the impacted well NDGW08 and NDGW07 fall on or
very close to the 1:1 trend lines for deep formation brines, with the exception of the Three Forks/ Sanish
formation. NDGW07 and NDGW08 data are similar to the formation waters when plotting log
sodium/chloride versus log calcium/chloride (Figure 24D). The plots in Figure 24 are useful in suggesting
62
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Period
Permian
Pennsylvanian
Mississippian
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Group
Minnelusa
Big Snowy
Madison
Jefferson
Manitoba
Elk Point
Big Horn
Winnipeg
Formation
Spearfish
Minnekahta
Opeche
Broom Creek
Amseden
Tyler
Heath
Otter
Kibbey
Charles
Mission Canyon
Lodgepole
Midale1
Ratcliffe'-
Bakken
Three Forks/ Sanish
Sand2
Birdbear1
Duperow
Souris River
Dawson Bay
Prairie
Winnipegosis
Ashern
interlake
Stonewall
Stony Mountain
Red River
Winnipeg
Deadwood
Hydrocarbons
Gas, Oil
Oil
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Oil
Gas, Oil
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oil
Gas, Oi!
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Oil
Oil
Gas, Oii
Oil
Gas, Oil
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Gas, Oii, Source Rock
Gas, Oil, Source Rock
Figure 23. Detailed stratigraphy of the Paleozoic strata in the Williston Basin in North Dakota. (Source: Stilwell et al., 2009).
63
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
cn
3-
(0 2-
o 1
D)
JD
1-
o
3-
2-
E
D
'c 1
O
0-
12345
log Chloride (mg/L)
01234
log Chloride (mg/L)
4-
j
~5) , :
E. 3-
E
1 2-
-WTBT ..--- "^KA
jj$omi£-'"ii" *
nfc .. pur ^
^^
Legend
A NDGW01
A NDGW02
A NDGW03
A NDGW04
A NDGW05
A NDGW06
* NDGW07
* NDGW08
A NDGW09
A NDGW10
""o i 2 3 4 s" A NDGW11
log Chloride (mg/L) A NDGW12
A NDGW13
2:
"oT
c 1 -
o
.C
O
E °-
=3
'o
(0 .
O ~1'
D)
O
-2-
D ^L
jflS^
A^j^P*
^S^ cJ*.
A»- «'-''^'
t*v'''
''
INIUljVV 14
A NDGW15
A NDGW16
* Tyler
* Madison
A NDGW01S
A NDGW02S
NDGW03S
A NDGW04S
NDGW05S
A NDGW06S
* NDGW07S
/r NDGW08S
NDGW09S
A NDGW10S
A NDGW11S
A NDGW12S
A NDGW13S
NDGW14S
A NDGW15S
NDGW16S
* Three Forks/ Sanish
Birdbear
* Duperow
)K Interlake
* Red River
* Bakken
0 1 2
log (Sodium/Chloride)
Figure 24. Plots of log chloride or sodium/chloride versus log cation and showing 1:1 trends between unimpacted wells and brine formation water. (A) log
calcium, (B) log magnesium, (C) log strontium, and (D) log sodium/chloride vs log calcium/chloride. Gray shaded areas represents a possible mixture of
Sentinel Butte aquifer water and Killdeer aquifer water. Yellow shaded area represents the unimpacted study well locations. NDGW07 and NDGW08 are
slightly depleted with respect to calcium and strontium based on the mixing trends; magnesium data falls on the mixing trends for several of the brine
formations; and the calcium/chloride ratios are slightly enriched with respect to the sodium/chloride ratios for NDGW07 and NDGW08. (Sources: USGS, 2002;
Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
64
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
that formation brines are a potential source of the impacts on NDGW07 and NDGW08 but are not useful
in determining which formation brines would be the source of the observed impacts.
The chloride to bromide ratio (CI/Br) can also be useful in differentiating sources of water. Panno et al.
(2006) concluded that ratios of halides plotted against their own concentrations can distinguish
between sources of chloride- contaminated water. In addition, Freeman (2007) was able to use CI/Br to
differentiate shallow ground water with elevated chloride concentrations between ground water that
result from mixing salt-dissolution and ground water that has mixed with formation brines.
Figure 25 is a plot of log chloride versus log CI/Br. The CI/Br in unimpacted wells are much lower than
those of the impacted wells (NDGW07 and NDGW08) and formation brines. The CI/Br for NDGW07 and
NDGWOSare in the same range as those of the brine formations. Both NDGW07and NDGW08 CI/Br
plot between the mixing trends of the formation brines and unimpacted wells. The percentage of
formation brines (up to 5%) needed to change the unimpacted Killdeer water along the mixing curves is
indicated in Figure 26. As shown, NDGW07 and NDGW08 only need between 0.1 to 1 % of any of the
formation brines to be mixed with the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water to explain the changes
observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08. The CI/Br found in NDGW07 and NDGW08 are consistent with
impacts as the result of mixing of formation brine water with Killdeer aquifer water.
Research has shown that lithium becomes more concentrated in brines, oil field brines, and saline lakes
(Fontes and Matray, 1993a; Fontes and Matray, 1993b; Bottomley et al., 2003; Hancini and Oelkers,
2011). Fontes and Matray (1993a) inferred that lithium was a conservative species during sea water
concentration, and lithium does not appear to be affected by reactions with solid salts and interbedded
sediments. For these reasons lithium would represent a good tracer for the successive mixings in
formation brines (Fontes and Matray, 1993a). Similarly, in saline lakes, lithium tends to be conserved
during evaporation (Hacini and Oelkers, 2011). In brines associated with oil fields near Paris, France,
Fontes and Matray (1993b) found that lithium concentrations in the brine were much higher than one
would predict for sea water evaporation and this was likely caused by digenetic contributions
(alterations in rock minerals during and after rock formation) for an extremely evolved brine. Bottomley
et al. (2003) found that lithium is primarily of marine origin because lithium is a relatively minor
component in crustal rocks in non-marine origin rocks. These authors were able to use lithium to show
deep brine waters mixing with near surface waters derived from the interactions with host rocks
(Bottomley et al., 2003). Therefore, lithium may be a useful indicator of water impacted by brines.
The log sodium/lithium ratios (Na/Li) were plotted against the log sodium concentrations for the study
data and the formation brine waters (Figure 27). It is important to note that lithium data were collected
only during the final round of sampling (October 2012), and it is not known how or if the Na/Li may have
changed prior to this sampling round. NDGW07 and NDGW08 lie between that of the unimpacted wells
and the other formation brines and fall on the mixing lines for the Bakken, Madison, and Birdbear
formations. This would be consistent with the Franchuk well having had out-of-zone fracturing as was
described in Arkadakshiy and Rostron (2012, 2013). Both the Birdbear and especially the Madison
formation were implicated as sources of water in Bakken wells by these researchers (Arkadakshiy and
Rostron, 2012, 2013; Peterman et al., 2012). As was done with the CI/Br, the percentage of formation
brines (up to 5%) needed to change the unimpacted Killdeer water along the mixing curves was plotted
and is shown in Figure 28. Again, NDGW07 and NDGW08 only need between 0.1 to 1 % of any of the
65
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
3.0^
2e
.5-
-
tt2.Q:
-^.
O^
QJ 1 .5 -
.2 :
-
1-°:
-
Q.5-
~
*i
\3B8y5 5
^ * _ ^ -~ ^ ^K ^ /i^jl( .*y ;
^ /
' /
" /
/
' /
/
1 f
, A
A
Legend
A Unimpacted Wells
if NDGW07
if NDGW08
^ Bakken
Madison
Birdbear
^ Duperow
2t Interlake
Red River
Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow Trend
Interlake Trend
Red River Trend
0
log Chloride (mg/L)
Figure 25. Plot of log chloride versus log CI/Br for the unimpacted study wells NDGW07 and NDGW08 brine formation waters of oil and gas produced
formations in Dunn County, North Dakota. Trend lines are plotted using the median chloride and CI/Br ratios of the unimpacted wells and the brine
formation. Yellow shaded area = unimpacted wells. NDGW07 and NDGW08 fall on the mixing lines between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine
waters. This suggests that the water in NDGW07 and NDGW08 is the result of mixing of unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water and formation brine water.
(Sources: USGS, 2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
66
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
3.0-
2.5-
-"" »K
SJ2.0-
O^ ;
0)1.5-
_O ;
1.0-
0.5-
xu^^^
^TO^\i ^
)f\ "-'
^5Hv
* * . ^'i
1 t* *"" "* ' * ^ff _i_n ^PVIQ
f^4"
'/ n H o/ ^ o/ f^0/,
n n I o/ u.i /o i/o j /o
»
ff
I
1
A
1^
*/A
Lege
*
*
)K
t
riS
nd
Unimpacted
NDGW07
NDGW08
Bakken
Madison
Birdbear
Duperow
Interlake
Red River
Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow Trend
Interlake Trend
Red River Trend
o
log Cl (mg/L)
Figure 26. Plot of log chloride versus log CI/Br showing mixing percentages. Horizontal ticks and number below correspond to the percent brine contribution,
assuming mixing between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. The mixing lines were developed using the median unimpacted and median
brine formation values. The data suggest that 0.1 % to 1 % of a formation brine would be needed to mix with unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water in order to
obtain the results for NDGW07 and NDGW08.
67
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
4.0-
3.5-
3.0-
O)
o
2.5-
2.0-
Le
.ege
*
*
}end
Unimpacted
NDGW07
NDGW08
Bakken
Madison
Birdbear
Duperow
Interlake
Red River
Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow Trend
Interlake Trend
- Red River Trend
<>
7r\
2
log Sodium (mg/L)
Figure 27. Plot of log sodium versus log Na/Li for study data and brine formation waters. The trend lines are plotted using the median sodium concentrations
and median Na/Li ratios between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. NDGW07 and NDGW08 fall on the mixing lines between the
unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. This suggests that the water in NDGW07 and NDGW08 is the result of mixing of unimpacted Killdeer
aquifer water and formation brine water. (Sources: USGS, 2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
68
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
4.0-
3.5-
3.0-
O)
o
2.5-
2.0-
0.1%
Legend
jL Unimpacted
if NDGW07
if NDGW08
)f( Bakken
^ Madison
Birdbear
Duperow
Interlake
Red River
Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow Trend
Interlake Trend
Red River Trend
1
4
5
log Sodium (mg/L)
Figure 28. Plot of log sodium versus log Na/Li showing mixing percentages. Vertical ticks and number above and below correspond to the percent brine
contribution, assuming mixing between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. The mixing lines were developed using the median
unimpacted and median brine formation values. The data suggest that 0.1 % to 1 % of a formation brine would be needed to mix with unimpacted Killdeer
aquifer water in order to obtain the results for NDGW07 and NDGW08.
69
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
formation brines to be mixed with the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water to explain the changes
observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08.
Several researchers have suggested the use of iodide as a potential indicator to distinguish between
sources of ground water (Lloyd et al., 1982; Howard and Beck, 1993; Stoessell, 1997; Panno et al., 2006).
Lloyd et al. (1982) found that the presence of iodide in ground water indicates sea water intrusion into
aquifers along English estuaries and can be used to distinguish ground waters in limestones and shaley
gypsiferous rocks as well as to indicate residence time. Iodide has also been found to be useful in
differentiating waters impacted by road salts and saline bed rock waters even when these waters are
not distinguishable using major ions (Howard and Beck, 1993). Finally, Stoessell (1997) was able to show
that iodide was useful in identifying ground water that had been potentially impacted by oil field brines.
A plot of log chloride versus log Cl/l ratios is shown in Figure 29; again, iodide was collected only during
the final round of sampling (October 2012). It is not known how or if the Cl/l changed before this
sampling round. Figure 29 shows that the Cl/l in NDGW07 and NDGW08 is lower than the unimpacted
wells and falls outside the mixing trends between the unimpacted wells and the formation brines. Also,
it can be seen that, based on the spread of the Madison formation brine data, NDGW07 and NDGW08
could still potentially fall within the mixing envelope (defined by the area between the upper and lower
limit lines for the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer and the brine formation) of the Madison formation brine
waters. Therefore, mixing envelopes were prepared for the Bakken formation brines and the Madison
formation brines (Figure 30). NDGW07 and NDGW08 do fall within the mixing envelopes of the Madison
formation brines (Figure 30B), whereas NDGW07 and NDGW08 do not fall within the mixing envelopes
of the Bakken brines (Figures 30A). This finding suggests that the Madison formation brine is the source
of the brine impact on NDGW07 and NDGW08.
Figure 31 shows a plot of the reciprocal strontium concentration versus 87Sr/86Sr ratio for the study data,
the Bakken formation, and the Madison formation (Ratcliffe member). NDGW07 and NDGW08 also plot
between the unimpacted and brine formations. The unimpacted wells and NDGW07 and NDGW08 have
an 87Sr/86Sr isotopic composition similar to the Madison formation but are different than the 87Sr/86Sr
isotopic composition of the Bakken formation. Also indicated on Figure 31 are arrows showing changes
in NDGW07 and NDGW08 between the October 2011 and October 2012 sampling rounds. The changes
are primarily associated with the strontium concentrations.
Time trends for the study data and mixing curves between the unimpacted wells and the brine
formations (Bakken and Madison) were used to better understand the source of the brine impacts seen
in NDGW07 and NDGW08 (Figures 32 and 33). Both the Bakken and Madison formation waters could
explain the apparent 87Sr/86Sr isotopic signature of NDGW07 and NDGW08 (Figure 31). Figure 32 further
investigates the changes in strontium isotopic composition and concentration between the October
2011 and October 2012 sampling rounds. Figure 32 shows that there was a very slight decrease in the
strontium isotopic composition between the two sampling rounds. Furthermore, the isotopic
composition trends of the unimpacted wells and those of NDGW07 and NDGW08 are similar. This
suggests that the changes in strontium isotopic composition are likely part of the natural variations in
the Killdeer aquifer at the Franchuk well site. NDGW07 and NDGW08 strontium concentrations trends
(Figure 32) are different than those of the unimpacted wells (except NDGW06). The strontium
concentrations in the unimpacted wells (except NDGW06) did not appear to vary between the October
2011 and October 2012 sampling rounds. NDGW07 and NDGW08 both show decreasing strontium
70
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
5-
-
-
-
.
^ 4-
^^
O
s**^
O-
3-
-
-
-3l&
vjX
' " ' ^/
/ ^Jlffix
i '
i /
!/ ' ~ ~ )K £
* X K
C r:j^vS;
x ,~
SJ/
/T^
XT/
Legend
^L Unimpacted
-^ NDGW07
if NDGW08
^ Bakken
* Madison
RjrHhpar
^ Duperow
T\ Interlake
^ Red River
Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Birdbear Trend
Duperow
Interlake
Red River
0
4
log Chloride (mg/L)
Figure 29. Plot of log chloride versus log Cl/l for study data and brine formation waters. The trend lines are plotted using the median chloride concentrations
and median Cl/l ratios between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. Using the median chloride concentrations and the median Cl/l ratios,
NDGW07 and NDGW08 appear to fall outside the mixing trends between the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water and formation brine waters. (Sources: USGS,
2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012; USGS, 2013).
71
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
5-
4-
D)
O
3-
A
*
Legend
A Unimpacted
if NDGW07
if NDGW08
^ Bakken
Bakken Trend
Bakken Upper Boundary
Bakken Lower Boundary
5-
4-
O
en
o
3-
B
Legend
A Unimpacted
if NDGW07
if NDGW08
Madison
Madison Trend
- - - Madison Upper Boundary
- Madison Lower Boundary
log Chloride (mg/L)
log Chloride {mg/L)
Figure 30. Plot of log chloride versus log Cl/l for study data and (A) Bakken formation water and (B) Madison formation waters. The trend lines are plotted
using the median chloride concentrations and median Cl/l ratios between the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. The mixing envelopes for
the Bakken formation water indicates that NDGW07 and NDGW08 are not likely the result of mixing of Bakken formation water and the unimpacted Killdeer
aquifer water. The water found in NDGW07 and NDGW08 could have resulted from the mixing of unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water and Madison formation
water because the water found in NDGW07 and NDGW08 fall within the mixing envelope. (Sources: USGS, 2002; Shouaker-Stash, 2008; Preston et al., 2012;
USGS, 2013).
72
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
0.711-
0.710-
C/5
CD
CO
CO
0.709-
0.708-
*>
Legend
Bakken Formation
Madison Formation (Ratcliffe Member)
I
|
NDGW01
NDGW03
NDGW05
NDGW07
NDGW10
NDGW12
NDGW14
1
NDGW02
NDGW04
NDGW06
NDGW08
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW15
0.000
0.002
0.004
1/Strontium (L/jag)
Figure 31. Strontium isotope plot at the Killdeer retrospective case study. Yellow shaded area represents the unimpacted wells. Black and red arrows
indicate the changes in strontium concentrations between the October 2011 sampling round and the October 2012 sampling round for NDGW07 and
NDGW08. Although the strontium isotopic composition did not change between these two events, the strontium concentration did change. The strontium
concentrations over this time period became more like the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water. The strontium isotopic composition was similar to that of the
Madison formation waters. (Source: USGS, 2013).
73
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
CO
CO
r-
CO
0.7088
0.7086
0.7084
0.7082
0.7080
0.7078 H
0.7076
0.7074
4000
3000
3 2000
1000
0
9/13/2011
Legend
-A-WISETXGW01
-A-WISETXGW02
-A-WISETXGW03
-A-WISETXGW04
-A-WISETXGW05
-A-WISETXGW06
-A-WISETXGW07
AWISETXGW08
-A-WISETXGW09
-A-WISETXGW14
3/13/2012
9/13/2012
Time
Figure 32. Strontium isotopic ratio and concentration time trends. The strontium isotopic composition did not change over the time period of the study;
however, the strontium concentration did change over the time period of the study in NDGW07 and NDGW08. The unimpacted wells strontium
concentrations and isotopic signature remained relatively constant over the time period of the study.
74
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
0.711-
0.710H
CO
CD
CO
0.709 H
0.708-
A
Legend
A NDGW01
NDGW03
NDGW05
NDGW07
NDGW10
NDGW12
NDGW14
^^^m
i
NDGW02
NDGW04
NDGW06
NDGW08
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW15
Bakken Formation Mixing Trend
Madison Formation (Ratcliffe
Member) Mixing Trend
-A*
0.01% 0.1%
1%
5%
1000
10000
100000 1000000
Strontium (|ug/L)
Figure 33. Strontium isotope mixing curves. Horizontal ticks and number below correspond to the percent brine contribution, assuming mixing between
the unimpacted wells and the formation brine waters. The mixing lines were developed using the median unimpacted and median brine formation values.
The data suggest that 0.1 % to 1 % of a formation brine would be needed to mix with unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water in order to obtain the results for
NDGW07 and NDGW08. Black shaded area represents the Bakken formation and the green shaded area represents the Madison formation (Ratcliffe
member).
75
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
concentration between the October 2011 and October 2012 sampling rounds. NDGW06 shows a slight
increasing strontium concentration during this time interval. However, using the data collected as part
of this study, it is not known whether the Sr concentration in NDGW06 would constitute an upward
trend or if this is the result of an anomalous data point.
The percentage of formation brines (up to 5%) needed to change the unimpacted Killdeer water along
the mixing curves was plotted and is shown in Figure 33. Again, NDGW07 and NDGW08 only need
between 0.1 to 1 % of any of the formation brines to be mixed with the unimpacted Killdeer aquifer
water to explain the changes observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08. Based on mixing models alone, one
cannot distinguish between the strontium isotopic fingerprint of the Bakken formation brine or the
Madison formation brine.
Combining the 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratios and concentration time trends with a mixing analysis (Figure 34)
can potentially be used to delineate a source of the brine observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08. If the
Bakken formation was the source of the brine, one would expect the 87Sr/86Sr ratio in NDGW07 and
NDGW08 to decrease with time, which was not observed. Rather the 87Sr/86Sr ratio remained relatively
constant with time. This relatively constant 87Sr/86Sr ratio over the course of the study in NDGW07 and
NDGW08 suggests that the Madison formation would be the brine source. The reason for this is that
based on the mixing model for the Madison formation, only the strontium concentration would be
required to change and not the 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio, which was observed in the study. As was stated
earlier, Arkadakshiy and Rostron (2013) found that many Bakken wells often had out-of-zone fractures,
so this could potentially have happened at the Franchuk well and would explain why the impacts on
NDGW07 and NDGW08 did not have an isotopic signature like the Bakken formation wells.
Stable isotopes of water (618O and 62H) were collected as part of this study and compared with data for
formation waters produced in Dunn County, North Dakota (Figure 35). In Figure 35A one can see that
the study data mostly lie below the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL) (Craig, 1961), and the Local
Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) (Kendall and Coplen, 2001) fits the study data better. With the exception
of the Madison formation, all other formation waters show considerable differences between the study
samples and the formation water isotopic signature, and NDGW07 and NDGW08 do not fit the mixing
trends. The water isotopic signature of the Madison formation overlaps the study isotopic water
signature but is slightly shifted to lower values of 618O and 62H (Figure 35). If one looks at the study
portion of this plot in detail (Figure 35B) it appears that the majority of the unimpacted wells fall on the
LMWL. This is not unexpected because the main source of water in the Killdeer aquifer is believed to be
recharge from precipitation (Klausing, 1979; Murphy, 2001). A closer look also reveals that the isotopic
composition of the water from NDGW07 and NDGW08 initially are above the LMWL and then move
below the LMWL, as indicated by the arrows in Figure 35B. The majority of the unimpacted wells are
somewhat shifted from NDGW07 and NDGW08 to higher values of 618O and 62H. In addition, it appears
that NDGW07 and NDGW08 plot within the isotopic signature of the Madison formation (Figure 35B).
Warner et al. (2012) points out that 618O and 62H are not sensitive tracers for mixing of two sources of
water. Therefore, stable isotopes of water are not sensitive enough to determine if the Madison
formation is the source of the changes in water quality seen in NDGW07 and NDGW08. What Figure
35B does point out is that the other formation waters are not the source of the observed impacts in
NDGW07 and NDGW08, based on water isotopic signatures.
76
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
0.711-
0.710-
CD
00
r^-
co
0.709-
0.708-
Lege
Legend
NDGW01
NDGW03
NDGW05
NDGW07
NDGW10
NDGW12
NDGW14
NDGW02
NDGW04
NDGW06
NDGW08
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW15
Bakken Formation Mixing Trend
Madison Formation (Ratcliffe
Member) Mixing Trend
+±
1000
10000
100000 1000000
Strontium (|ug/L)
Figure 34. Strontium isotope mixing curves for the Bakken formation and the Madison formation (Ratcliffe member) without mixing values. Black shaded
area represents the Bakken formation and the green shaded area represents the Madison formation (Ratcliffe member). Mixing trends plotted using
unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water and waters from the Madison and Bakken formations indicate the water in the study wells NDGW07 and NDGW08 could
have resulted from mixing of waters from the end members. (Source: USGS, 2013).
77
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
-20-
-20
-15
-10
-5
,18
81BO (permil) (VSMOW)
-110
-120
-130-
-140-
-150-
-160
-20
-18
-16
-14
5180 (permil) (VSMOW)
*
*
Legend
GMWL
LMWL
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGWQ6
NDGW07
NDGWOS
NDGWOS
NDGW10
NDGW11
NDGW12
NDGW13
NDGW14
NDGW15
NDGW16
)j^ Bakken
: Madison
- - Bakken Trend
Madison Trend
Bird bear Trend
Duperow Trend
- - Interlake Trend
Red River Trend
Figure 35. Water isotope plots of 6 O versus 6 H. (A) Study data and formation water data, (B) Expanded view from A. Colored areas represent the formation
waters ranges and colors correspond to color in the legend for the formation trends. This figure shows that the water derived in NDGW07 and NDGWOS is not
likely the result of mixing of formation brines other than potentially the Madison formation brine water with unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water. (Source:
Rostron and Holmden, 2000; USGS, 2013).
78
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
An impact due to road salt applied to the highway just to the south of the Franchuk well pad would be
very unlikely because the ground water flow direction would have to be to the north, in contrast to the
south, based on information from this study. Based on the data from the other unimpacted monitoring
wells, impacts caused by surrounding oil and gas activities or land use practices or industrial activities
are also unlikely because one would expect there to be residual chemical signature of an impact in those
unimpacted monitoring wells. These unimpacted monitoring wells were not statistically different than
the historical background water quality of the Killdeer aquifer. Based on this study, the blowout at the
Franchuk well is a probable cause of the impact seen in NDGW07 and NDGW08.
The preceding analysis of potential sources indicates that the source of the brine impact on NDGW07
and NDGW08 is consistent with mixing of Madison formation brines with Killdeer aquifer water.
Although the Franchuk well was drilled into the Bakken formation, others have pointed out that out-of-
zone fracturing is a common problem with Bakken wells (Arkadakshiy and Rostron, 2012; 2013).
Furthermore, Aradakshiy and Rostron (2013) have pointed out that when out-of-zone fracturing occurs,
many Bakken wells have a Madison-like produced water. This could explain the influence of Madison
formation water in NDGW07 and NDGW08.
8.5. Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA)
Tert-butyl alcohol was consistently and selectively present in NDGW07 and NDGW08 throughout the
course of the study (Appendix B, Table B4). The potential sources for the observed TBA are fluids
released during the Franchuk well blowout event and potential releases of contamination (see Appendix
C) related to gasoline spills and leaking USTs.
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) can be present in gasoline and can degrade to TBA (Wilson et al., 2005).
However, gasoline as the source of TBA is unlikely because methyl tert-butyl ether was not detected nor
was any other components of gasoline or the daughter products of gasoline detected in upgradient
wells or other monitoring wells.
Although TBA was not listed as a component of the hydraulic fracturing fluid used at the Franchuk well,
it is known to be a daughter product of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, which was used (see Table 1) (Hiatt et
al., 1964; Martynova et al., 2001; Chen, 2005; Stepovik and Potkina, 2013). Hiatt et al. (1964) found that
unreacted tert-butyl hydroperoxide [(CH3)3COOH] would form TBA [(CH3)3COH] and oxygen (O2) by the
following mechanism:
(CH3)3COOH ^ (CH3)3CO + OH
(CH3)3CO +(CH3)3COOH ^ (CH3)3COH + (CH3)3COO
2(CH3)3COO -^ 02 + 2(CH3)3CO -.
Others also have proposed mechanisms for the degradation of tert-butyl hydroperoxide in the presence
of metal cations (Mn+) and organic compounds (R-H) (Martynova et al., 2001; Chen, 2005; Stepovik and
Potkina, 2013):
(CH3)3COOH + Mn+ ^ (CH3)3CO +OH~ + Mn+1
(CH3)3CO +R - H ^ (CH3)3COH + R -.
79
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Either of these mechanisms is a plausible explanation of the TBA detected in NDGW07 and NDGW08.
Because TBA was not detected in any other monitoring wells or the upgradient wells it is unlikely that
the source of TBA was any other oil and gas activities in the area.
8.6. Sulfate
Sulfate concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer commonly exceeded the secondary maximum contaminant
level (SMCL) for sulfate. This was true for data collected as part of the study and historical databases
and also was reported by Battelle (2013). Gypsum is a common source of sulfate as well as a sink for
sulfate in the environment (Hounslow, 1995). Figure 36 is a plot showing the relationship of sulfate
concentrations to the gypsum saturation index. Figure 36 was constructed using gypsum saturation
indices calculated using Geochemist Workbench. Forty-one of the 42 study samples collected (98%) had
charge balances < 5%. One sample, NDGW05-102011, had a charge balance of 5.2% and was still
included in Figure 36 because this would potentially cause only a minor error in the calculation of the
gypsum saturation index.
As is shown in Figure 36, even when the sulfate concentrations are greater than the SMCL, the gypsum
saturation index would indicate that the water in the Killdeer aquifer is under-saturated with respect to
gypsum. This means that the water can continue to have higher sulfate concentrations until the
saturation index reaches 0. According to the soil survey of Dunn County, many of the soils have salt
crystals/ layers, gypsum crystals/layers, and carbonate crystals/layers in the sub soil (USDA, 2013). All
these are potential sources for sulfate in the Killdeer aquifer. The primary recharge to the Killdeer
aquifer is through recharge from precipitation, and as the precipitation leaches through the soil to the
aquifer it is likely to come into contact with gypsum and would dissolve some of the gypsum or selenite,
releasing sulfate into the water. Therefore, the high sulfate in the Killdeer aquifer is naturally occurring
and most likely not related to any anthropogenic sources.
80
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Q.
o1
1.0
0.5-
x
CD 0.0
.0 -0.5 H
"ro
ro -1.0H
E
-1.5-
-2.0-
-2.!
V
0
\
2
\
4
\
6
\
8
Sulfate (mM)
Figure 36. Plot showing the relationship of sulfate concentrations collected in this study to the saturation index of
gypsum. Saturation index equal to zero indicates that the sulfate concentrations in the water is in equilibrium with
solid gypsum, saturation index> 1 indicates the sulfate concentrations of water are oversaturated with respect to
gypsum, and saturation index <1 indicates sulfate concentrations in the water are under-saturated with respect to
gypsum. The black triangles = study data and the red dashed line in the sulfate secondary MCL As is shown, all
study samples were under-saturated with respect to gypsum regardless if they were secondary MCL for sulfate.
81
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
9. Summary of Case Study Results
The Killdeer Retrospective Case Study was conducted near the city of Killdeer, in Dunn County, North
Dakota. The area was and is currently part of the Bakken Shale development. This retrospective case
study contrasts with the other EPA retrospective case studies in that the study was done in an area
where a known release occurred during the hydraulic fracturing process. The known release was the
result of a blowout that occurred in the Franchuk 44-20 SWH well in September 2010, during the fifth
stage of a 23-stage hydraulic fracture (Jacob, 2011). The blowout resulted in the release of hydraulic
fracturing fluids, oil, and flowback water onto the land surface and possibly into the Killdeer aquifer.
The blowout resulted when an inner string of casing ruptured due to over-pressurization during the
hydraulic fracturing process. The blowout prompted state action, which led to the installation of
monitoring wells on and around the well pad and monitoring of nearby domestic wells, water supply
wells, and municipal wells for the city of Killdeer. A comprehensive evaluation of the ground water
around the well pad was conducted as part of this study to determine the level of impact and to account
for all potential sources of contamination. Two potential pathways for contamination of the Killdeer
aquifer from the blowout were considered: (1) direct release from the Franchuk wellbore laterally into
the Killdeer aquifer and (2) indirect contamination from surface infiltration of released fluids down into
the Killdeer aquifer.
The initial screening analysis of the study data identified two wells, NDGW07 and NDGW08, as having
different water quality than the other study wells. NDGW07 and NDGW08 showed differences in the
majority of parameters such as chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and strontium. The study wells,
excluding NDGW07, NDGW08, and NDGW09, were then compared with historical data obtained for the
Killdeer aquifer. NDGW09 was not compared with historical data from the Killdeer aquifer because it
was screened partly or entirely within the Sentinel Butte aquifer.
All study wells, except the wells noted above, were compared with historical data from wells within 3
miles of the Franchuk 44-20SHW well (Franchuk well). Analysis of the historical data analysis indicated
that all study wells except NDGW07, NDGW08, and NDGW09 were not significantly different than the
historical data from the Killdeer aquifer. The October 2012 data for NDGW06 had chloride
concentrations higher than what was expected. A Q-test was performed on NDGW06, and it was
determined that the October 2012 NDGW06 was indeed an outlier with respect to chloride but was not
an outlier for other parameters. Even though chloride concentrations in NDGW06 for the October 2012
sampling round were higher than would be expected, the inclusion of this point into the statistical
analysis did not change the fact that there were no statistical differences between the study wells
(except wells already noted) and the historical data. Based on this comparison with historical data, the
study wells, excluding NDGW07, NDGW08 and NDGW09, were considered unimpacted wells. A
summary of potential ground water impacts is provided in Table 9.
There were no detectable concentrations of propane or butane in any of the study samples collected.
Ethane was detected in only one sample during the study; the detected concentration, 0.0044 mg/L, is
approximately two times the QL (0.0028 mg/L) for ethane. Methane was detected in 24% of the study
samples, with a maximum observed concentration of 0.0253 mg/L. The methane concentrations
detected in the study were compared with background methane concentrations discussed in a report on
field screening for shallow gases in North Dakota (Anderson et al., 2010). This comparison indicated
82
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
that the methane concentrations observed during the study were consistent with background methane
concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer (0.0149 to 0.3978 mg/L).
Table 9. Potential ground water impacts in the Killdeer retrospective case study.
Parameter
Chloride
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Strontium
Well Type
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Impacted Wells/
Total Wells
2/9 [NDGW07,
NDGW08, and
NDGW06(October
2012 sampling
round only)]
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
2/9(NDGW07and
NDGW08)
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
2/9(NDGW07and
NDGW08)
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
2/9(NDGW07and
NDGW08)
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
2/9(NDGW07and
NDGW08)
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
Sample
Type
Ground
water
Ground
water
Ground
water
Ground
water
Ground
water
Description
Detections ranged
from 0.67 to 2940
mg/L; Secondary
MCLexceedances;
Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections ranged
from 3.36 to 583
mg/L; Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections ranged
from 1.81 to 276
mg/L; Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections ranged
from lllto 1040
mg/L; Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections ranged
from 117 to 5100
u.g/L; Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Potential Sources
Brines
Brines
Brines
Brines
Brines
83
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
Table 9. Potential ground water impacts in the Killdeer retrospective case study.
Parameter
Tert-butyl
alcohol
Sulfate
Benzene
Well Type
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Monitoring
Domestic
Municipal
Depot
State Well
Impacted Wells/
Total Wells
2/9(NDGW07and
NDGW08)
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
2/9 (NDGW04and
NDGW08)
1/3 (NDGW10)
0/1
1/2 (NDGW16
0/1
1/9 [NDGW07
(October 2012)]
0/3
0/1
0/2
0/1
Sample
Type
Ground
water
Ground
water
Ground
water
Description
Detections ranged
from 156 to 975
ug/L; Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections ranged
from 74.5 to 2940
mg/L; Secondary
MCLexceedances;
Elevated
concentrations
compared to
historical data and
surrounding wells
Detections at 0.62
Hg/L
Potential Sources
Hydraulic Fracturing
Brines; natural sources
Gasoline; degradation
products; vehicular traffic;
current and/or historical
drilling practices
Thirty-eight VOC compounds were analyzed for during the study, and at least one was detected in 15%
of the samples. The VOCs detected were acetone, toluene, m+p-xylene, o-xylene, 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene, and 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (2% of the samples); benzene (7% of the samples); and
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) (15% of the samples). With the exception of TBA, all VOC compounds detected
in the study wells could be related to a potential source other than hydraulic fracturing. TBA, however,
was consistently detected in NDGW07 and NDGW08, but not in the unimpacted wells. The
concentrations of TBA observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08 was consistent with a plume moving through
these wells. In addition, TBA is a known daughter product of the degradation of MTBE and tert-butyl
hydroperoxide. Degradation of MTBE is not a likely source, because MTBE was not detected in these
wells nor were other compounds one would expect to be associated with MTBE, such as gasoline
constituents. However, the TBA was consistent with the degradation of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, a
component used in the hydraulic fracturing fluid at the time of the blowout. So it is unlikely that sources
other than the blow out were responsible for the observed TBA in NDGW07 and NDGW08. Although
benzene was detected in NDGW07 during the October 2012 sampling round, no potential source of this
benzene could be determined, because benzene was not detected in other wells or during other
sampling rounds.
Similar to the VOC data, there were limited detections of other organic compounds in the study data,
and it was not possible to link these compounds to any source of contamination. No glycols were
84
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
detected in the study wells during the study. The detection frequency for low-molecular-weight acids
was 31%, and the detections were for formate (10% of samples) and acetate (31% of the samples).
Finally, 84 SVOCs were analyzed for and the detection frequency was 34%. The SVOCs detected during
the study were 2-butoxyethanol, dimethyl phthalate (2% of the samples), bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
(17% of the samples), and bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (34% of the samples).
The limited hydrological investigations at the Franchuk well pad were able to show a general ground
water flow direction. The temporal fluctuations in the hydraulic gradients on the pad appear to be
significant. Although there appeared to be significant fluctuations in the hydraulic gradients, the ground
water always had a southerly component to the ground water flow. Based on this analysis brine
contamination from road salt could be eliminated as a potential cause of the observed changes to water
quality in NDGW07 and NDGW08. For road salt to impact NDGW07 and NDGW08 the flow direction
would have to have a northerly component, which was not observed.
Time-trend analysis revealed that the data collected over time was indicative of transport of
contaminants through NDGW07 and NDGW08. In addition, the peak concentrations in the parameters
examined were first observed in NDGW08 and then observed in NDGW07 at a later date. Chloride
concentration data for the decay portion of the time series plots were found to follow pseudo-first order
kinetics, and a kinetic model could be developed to estimate how long it would take for chloride to
attain unimpacted chloride concentrations found in the Killdeer aquifer. Based on this analysis it would
take approximately 1,246 days to attain the mean unimpacted chloride concentration and 1,433 days to
attain the median unimpacted chloride concentration at the Killdeer site.
Other nearby oil and gas activities, land use practices, or industrial sources as causes of the observed
impacts on NDGW07 and NDGW08 are not likely. The monitoring well network installed around the
Franchuk well pad (except NDGW07 and NDGW08) would have detected a plume, or there would be
residual changes to ground water quality in these monitoring wells if the source of the contamination
were off-site. No plumes or residual changes to ground water quality in monitoring wells other than
NDGW07 and NDGW08 were observed. Therefore, the only source that would be consistent with the
impacts observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08 would be the blow out that occurred on this pad.
Further analysis of unimpacted water with NDGW07 and NDGW08 indicated that the impacts on
NDGW07 and NDGW08 were consistent with impacts caused by the mixing of briny water with water
from the Killdeer aquifer. All methodologies used to delineate the source indicated that the mixing of
unimpacted Killdeer aquifer water with deep formation brines would be consistent with the impacts
observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08. The use of sodium to lithium ratios (Na/Li), chloride to iodide
ratios Cl/l and isotopic analysis indicated the most likely cause of the impacts observed in NDGW07 and
NDGW08 was a brine with a signature of the Madison formation. Although a Madison formation brine
signature was not expected as the result of the impact from a Bakken formation well such as the
Franchuk well, the literature does support this possibility because out-of-zone fracturing has been
demonstrated for some Bakken wells.
Many of the study samples as well as the historical data indicated that sulfate exceeded its secondary
maximum contaminant level (SMCL). Analysis of the data and the geology of Dunn County indicate that
sulfate concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer are consistent with naturally occurring sources such as
gypsum and selenite in the soils of Dunn County. It is unlikely that any anthropogenic impacts would
cause the high sulfate concentrations observed in the Killdeer aquifer.
85
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Two of the 16 wells sampled in this investigation, NDGW07 and NDGW08, exhibited evidence of impacts
from the blowout of the Franchuk well. The impacts on NDGW07 and NDGW08 are consistent with
impacts from deep formation brine. The detections of TBA in NDGW07 and NDGW08 are another
important factor in determining the causes of impacts on these wells. The potential sources of
contamination at the Franchuk well site were related to nearby oil and gas exploration, leaking USTs,
land use practices, road salt, and the blowout of the Franchuk well. Other potential sources of
contamination could be ruled out based on hydrology and the lack of residual signatures of impacts in
nearby monitoring wells. The Franchuk well blowout would explain the impacts on NDGW07 and
NDGW08, because the fingerprint of the water is what would be expected as the result of mixing of
deep brine waters, specifically the Madison Formation water, with the Killdeer aquifer waters if out-of-
zone fracturing occurred. However, the exact mechanism/pathway could not be determined.
Key observations or findings from this study are listed below.
Thirty-eight VOCs were analyzed for during the study, and one or more of these VOCs were
identified in 15% of the study samples. With the exception of TBA, all VOCs detected in the
study wells could be related to a potential source other than hydraulic fracturing.
No glycols were detected in the study wells during the study.
Eighty-four SVOCs were analyzed for during the study, and one or more of these SVOCs were
identified in 34% of the study samples. The SVOC compounds detected in the study wells could
be related to a potential source other than hydraulic fracturing.
Methane was detected in 24% of the study samples, with a maximum observed concentration of
0.0253 mg/L Methane concentrations observed during the study were consistent with
background methane concentrations in the Killdeer aquifer (0.0149 to 0.3978 mg/L).
Thirty-eight percent of the study samples and the historical samples indicated that sulfate
exceeded its secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). The sulfate concentrations in the
Killdeer aquifer are consistent with naturally occurring sources such as gypsum and selenite in
the soils of Dunn County.
The data from all study wells except NDGW07, NDGW08, and NDGW09 (NDGW09 was screened
or partly screened in the Sentinel Butte aquifer) were not significantly different from the
historical data from the Killdeer aquifer, and these wells were considered unimpacted.
The study identified two wells, NDGW07 and NDGW08, that had water quality different from
the other study wells and historical data.
o NDGW07 and NDGW08 showed differences in the majority of parameters, including
chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and strontium.
o Time-trend analysis revealed that the data collected were indicative of transport of
contaminants through NDGW07 and NDGW08.
o TBA was consistently detected in NDGW07 and NDGW08, but not in the unimpacted
wells. TBA concentrations were consistent with the degradation of tert-butyl
86
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
hydroperoxide, a component used in the hydraulic fracturing fluid at the time of the
blowout.
o The limited hydrogeological investigations at the Franchuk well pad were able to show a
general ground water flow direction. Although there appeared to be fluctuations in the
hydraulic gradients, ground water always had a southerly flow component, which would
be consistent with a plume moving from the Franchuk well towards the impacted wells.
o All methodologies used to delineate the source indicated that the mixing of unimpacted
Killdeer aquifer water with deep formation brines would be consistent with the impacts
observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08. The deep formation brine had the signature of the
Madison formation. A Madison Formation brine signature is consistent with literature
that indicates out-of-zone fracturing has been observed in some Bakken wells.
The only potential source consistent with the impacts observed in NDGW07 and NDGW08 would
be the blow out that occurred on this pad.
87
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
References
Alpha Environmental Consultants, Inc. (2009). Technical consulting reports prepared in support of the
draft supplemental generic environmental impact statement for natural gas production in New York
State. Report for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, 352 pp.
Anderson, F.J., Gudmunsen, C.B., Hall, B.N., Ries, A.J., Christensen, A.R., and Bubach, B.J. (2010).
Shallow Gas Field Screening in North Dakota: Field Data Report (2009 and 2010) for Selected Counties.
North Dakota Geological Survey, Geologic Investigations No. 131. Bismarck, 109 pp.
Arkadakskiy, S. and Rostron, B. (2012). Stable isotope geochemistry helps in reducing out-of-zone
hydraulic fracturing and unwanted brine production from the Bakken Reservoir. Ebookbrowse.
http://ebookbrowsee.net/arkadakskiy-rostron-20121-pdf-d627732457.
Arkadakskiy, S. and Rostron, B. (2013). Tracking out-of-zone hydraulic fracturing in the Bakken with
naturally occurring tracers. GeoConvention 2013: Integration. Canadian Society of Petroleum
Geologists. Calgary, Alberta Canada. May 6-10, 2013.
Battelle (2013). Dunn County, North Dakota Retrospective Case Study Site Characterization Report.
Report Submitted to: American Petroleum Institute, and America's Natural Gas Alliance. (Battelle
Contract No. CON00011206), 94 pp.
Beak, D.G. (2013). Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn
County, ND. Rev. 2. GWERD Quality Assurance Project Plan (dated December 13, 2013), 121 pp.
Available at: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/bakken-qapp.pdf
Bethke, C.M. (2008). Geochemical and Biogeochemical Reaction Modeling, 2nd Edition. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Bottomley, D.J., Chan, L.H., Katz, A., Starinsky, A., and Clark, I.D. (2003). Lithium isotope geochemistry
and origin of Canadian Shield brines. Ground Water, v. 41, p. 847-856.
Bowen, Z.H., Oelsner, G.P., Cade, B.S., Gallegos, T.J., Farag, A.M., Mott, D.N., Potter, C.J., Cinotto, P.J.,
Clark, M.L, Kappel, W.M., Kresse, T.M., Melcher, C.P., Paschke, S.S., Susong, D.D., and Varela, B.A.
(2015). Assessment of surface water chloride and conductivity trends in areas of unconventional oil and
gas developmentWhy existing national data sets cannot tell us what we would like to know. Water
Resources Research, v. 51, p. 704-715.
Carlson, C.G. and Anderson, S.B. (1966). Sedimentary and tectonic history of North Dakota part of
Williston Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 49, p. 1833-1846.
Chen, C.M. (2005). Tert-butyl hydroperoxide: An Overview. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine,
University of Iowa, Spring 2005. Iowa City, 10 pp. Available at:
http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edU/corefacilities/esr/education/2005/l/ChenCM-Paper-l.pdf
City of Killdeer (2013). Killdeer, North Dakota. Available at: www.killdeer.com. Accessed on December
8, 2013.
Craig, H. (1961). Standard for reporting concentrations of deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural water.
Science, v. 133, p. 1833-1834.
88
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Davis, S.N., Whittemore, D.O., and Fabryka-Martin, J. (1998). Uses of CI/Br ratios in studies of potable
water. Ground Water, v. 36, p. 338- 350.
Dean, R.B. and Dixon, W.J. (1951). Simplified statistics for small numbers of observations. Analytical
Chemistry, v. 23, p. 636-638.
Delany, J.M. and Lundeen, S.R. (1990). The LLNLthermochemical database. Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory Report, UCRL-21658. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Douglas, J.G. (2012). Volatile organic compound contamination in groundwater samples and field
blanks. Prepared by CH2M Hill for the U.S. Department of Energy, SGW-52194, 53pp.
Dunn County (2012). Dunn County Comprehensive Plan. Available at:
http://www.dunncountynd.org/vertical/sites/%7B565AA8FB-A7E9-4453-8706-
895E3925615D%7D/uploads/Dunn County Comprehensive Plan - October 12.pdf. Accessed on
November 12, 2013.
Fontes, J.C. and Matray, J.M. (1993a). Geochemistry and origin of formation brines from the Paris Basin,
France: 1. Brines associated with Triassic salts. Chemical Geology, v. 109, p. 149-175.
Fontes, J.C. and Matray, J.M. (1993b). Geochemistry and origin of formation brines from the Paris Basin,
France: 2. Saline solutions associated with oil fields. Chemical Geology, v. 109, p. 177-200.
Freeman, J.T. (2007). The use of bromide and chloride mass ratios to differentiate salt-dissolution and
formation brines in shallow groundwaters of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Hydrogeology
Journal, v. 15, p. 1377-1385.
Griffiths, W.C., Camara, P., and Lerner, K.S. (1985). Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, an ubiquitous
environmental contaminant. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, v. 15, p. 140-151.
Groundwater Protection Council (GWPC) and All Consulting (2009). Modern shale gas development in
the United States: A primer. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and
National Energy Technology Laboratory. DE-FG26-04NT15455, 116 pp.
Hacini, M. and Oelkers, E.H. (2011). Geochemistry and behavior of trace elements during the complete
evaporation of the Merouane Chott Ephemeral Lake: Southeast Algeria. Aquatic Geochemistry, v. 17, p.
51-70.
Harkness, J.S., Dwyer, G.S., Warner, N.R., Parker, K.M., Mitch, W.A., and Vehgosh, A. (2015). Iodide,
bromide, and ammonium in hydraulic fracturing and oil and gas wastewaters: Environmental impacts.
Environmental Science and Technology, v. 49, p. 1955-1963.
Harris, O., Wilbur, S., George, J., and Eisenmann, C. (1998). Toxicological profile for 2-butoxyethanol and
2-butoxyethanol acetate. Prepared for Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Heck, T.J. (1988). Precambrian structure map of North Dakota. North Dakota Geologic Survey.
Miscellaneous Map No. 30.
Heck, T.J.; LeFever, R.D.; Fischer, D.W.; and LeFever, J. (2013). Overview of the Petroleum Geology of
the North Dakota Williston Basin. North Dakota Geological Survey.
https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/Resources/. Accessed December 10, 2013.
89
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Helms, L. (2010). Site visit. Personnel Communication. North Dakota Industrial Commission. November
2010.
Hiatt, R., Clipsham, J., and Visser, T. (1964). The induced decomposition of tert-butyl hydroperoxide.
Canadian Journal of Chemistry, v. 42, p. 2754-2757.
Hounslow, A. (1995). Water Quality Data: Analysis and Interpretation. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
Howard, K.W.F. and Beck, P.J. (1993). Hydrogeochemical implications of groundwater contamination by
road de-icing chemicals. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, v. 12, p. 245-268.
Hudak, P.P. and Wachal, D.J. (2001). Effects of brine injection wells, dry holes, and plugged oil/gas wells
on chloride, bromide, and barium concentrations in the Gulf Coast Aquifer, southeast Texas, U.S.
Environment International, v. 26, p. 497-503.
Hudak, P.P. (2003). Oil production and groundwater quality in the Edwards-Trinity Plateau Aquifer,
Texas. The Scientific World Journal, v. 3, p. 1147-1153.
Hudak, P.P. (2012). Nitrate and chloride concentrations in groundwater beneath a portion of the Trinity
Group Outcrop Zone, Texas. International Journal of Environmental Research, v. 6, p. 663-668.
Jacob, R. (2011). Incident Action Plan, Franchuk 44-20 SWH Incident. Denbury Onshore, LLC.
Katz, B.G., Eberts, S.M., and Kauffman, L.J. (2011). Using CI/Br ratios and other indicators to assess
potential impacts on groundwater quality from septic systems: A review and examples from principal
aquifers in the United States. Journal of Hydrology, v. 397, p. 151-166.
Kendall, C. and Coplen, T.B. (2001). Distribution of oxygen-18 and deuterium in river waters across the
United States. Hydrological Processes, v. 15, p. 1363-1393.
Klausing, R.L (1976). Groundwater Basic Data for Dunn County, North Dakota. Prepared by U.S.
Geological Survey. North Dakota Geologic Survey Bulletin 68- Part II. Bismarck.
Klausing, R.L. (1979). Ground-Water Resources of Dunn County, North Dakota. Prepared by U.S.
Geological Survey. North Dakota Geologic Survey Bulletin 68- Part III. Bismarck.
Leonard, A.R. and Ward, P.E. (1962). Use of Na/CI ratios to distinguish oil-field from salt-spring brines in
Western Oklahoma. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers, v. 450, p. B126-B127.
Lloyd, J.W., Howard, K.W.F., Pacey, N.R., and Tellam, J.H. (1982). The value of iodide as a parameter in
the chemical characterization of groundwaters. Journal of Hydrology, v. 57, p. 247-265.
Martynova, I.M., Stepovik, L.P., and Dodonov, V.A. (2001). Reaction of tri-and tetrasubstituted alkenes
with the low-temperature oxidizing system aluminum tert-butylate-tert-butyl hydroperoxide. Russian
Journal of General Chemistry, v. 71, p. 736-741.
Matschullat, J., Ottenstein, R., and Reimann, C. (2000). Geochemical background-can we calculate it?
Environmental Geology, v. 39, p. 990-1000.
Miller, D.M. (2015). Frequency of positive results in laboratory method blanks. In PA Brownfields
Conference, May 13-15, 2015, Erie, PA.
90
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (2013). Frequently Asked Questions. Available at:
http://www.mrlc.gov/faq Ic.php. Accessed on October 25, 2013.
Murphy, B.C. (2001). Geology of Dunn County. North Dakota Geological Survey. Bulletin 68-Part 1.
North Dakota State Water Commission. County Groundwater Studies 25- Part 1. Bismarck.
North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC) (2013a). Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas
Division. ND Historical Barrels of Oil Produced by County. Available at:
https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/stats/countymot.pdf. Accessed on November 12, 2013.
North Dakota State Water Commission (NDWC) (2013). Ground and Surface Water Data. Available at:
http://www.swc.state.nd.us/4dlink2/4dcgi/wellsearchform/Map%20and%20data%20resources/Last
accessed on July 10, 2013.
Olayiwola, R.O., Jimoh, R.O., Yusuf, A., and Abubakar, S. (2013). A mathematical study of contaminant
transport with first-order decay and time-dependent source concentration in an aquifer. Universal
Journal of Applied Mathematics, v. 1, p. 112-119.
Panno, S.V., Hackley, K.C., Hwang, H.H., Greenberg, S.E., Krapac, I.G., Landsberger, S., and O'Kelly, D.J.
(2006). Characterization and identification of Na-CI sources in ground water. Ground Water, v. 44, p.
176-187.
Perez Guerrero, J.S., Skaggs, T.H., and van Genuchten, M.T. (2010). Analytical solution for multi-species
contaminant transport in finite media with time-varying boundary conditions. Transport in Porous
Media, v. 85, p. 171-188.
Perez Guerrero, J.S., Pontedeiro, E.M., van Genuchten, M.T., and Skaggs, T.H. (2013). Analytical
solutions of the one-dimensional advection-dispersion solute transport equation subject to time-
dependent boundary conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 221, p. 487-491.
Peterman, Z., Thamke, J., Futa, K., and Preston, T. (2012). Strontium isotope evolution of produced
water in the East Popular Oil Field, Montana. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual
Convention and Exhibition. Long Beach, California. April 22-25, 2012.
Preston, T.M., Smith, B.D., Thamke, J.N., and Chesley-Preston, T. (2012). Water-Quality and Geophysical
Data for Three Study Sites within the Williston Basin and Prairie Pothole Region. U.S. Geological Survey,
Reston. Open-File Report 2012-1149, 21 pp.
Reimann, C, Filzmoser, P., Garrett, R., and Dutter, R. (2008). Statistical Data Analysis Explained. John
Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, UK.
Rorabacher, D.B. (1991). Statistical treatment for rejection of deviant values: critical values of Dixon's"
Q" parameter and related subrange ratios at the 95% confidence level. Analytical Chemistry, v. 63, p. 39-
146.
RSKSOP-211v3 (2009a). Field Analytical QA/QC, 4 pp.
RSKSOP-213v4 (2009b). Standard Operating Procedure for Operation of Perkin Elmer Optima 3300 DV
ICP-OES, 22 pp.
91
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
RSKSOP-223v2 (2009c). Determination of Iodide in Water Samples Using 0.2 M Potassium Hydroxide
Carrier with Lachat Flow Injection Analysis, 11 pp.
RSKSOP-175v5 (2010a). Sample Preparation and Calculations for Dissolved Gas Analysis in Water
Samples Using a GC Headspace Equilibration Technique, 33 pp.
RSKSOP-194v4 (2010b). Gas Analysis by Micro Gas Chromatograph (Agilent Micro 3000), 13pp.
RSKSOP-214v5 (2010c). Quality Control Procedures for General Parameters Analyses using the Lachat
Flow Injection Analyses (FIA), 10 pp.
RSKSOP-296vl (2010d). Determination of Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotope Ratios in Water Samples using
a High Temperature Conversion Elemental Analyzer (TC/EA), a Continuous Flow Unit, and an Isotope
Ratio Mass Spectrometer (IRMS), 8 pp.
RSKSOP-326vO (2010e). Standard Operating Procedure for Manual Measurements of Groundwater
Levels for Hydrogeological Characterization, 4 pp.
RSKSOP-112v6 (2011a). Standard Operating Procedure for Quantitative Analysis of Low Molecular
Weight Acids in Aqueous Samples by HPLC, 22 pp.
RSKSOP-330vO (2011b). Determination of Various Fractions of Carbon in Aqueous Samples Using the
Shimadzu TOC-VCPH Analyzer, 15 pp.
RSKSOP-334vO (2011c). Determination of Stable Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotope Ratios in Water Samples
using a Picarro L2120J Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometer (CRDS), 30 pp.
RSKSOP-276v4 (2012a). Determination of Major Anions in Aqueous Samples Using Capillary Ion
Electrophoresis with Indirect UV Detection and Empower 2 Software, 11 pp.
RSKSOP-288v3 (2012b). Determination of Major Anions in the Presence of High Levels of Chloride
and/or Sulfate in Aqueous Samples using Capillary Ion Electrophoresis, 13 pp.
Serodio, P. and Nogueira, J.M.F. (2006). Considerations on ultra-trace analysis of phthalates in drinking
water. Water Research, v. 40, p. 2572-2582.
Shaver, R. (2009). Water Availability for Oil Well Development in North Dakota and Status of Water
Depot Permit Applications. North Dakota State Water Commission, Water Appropriations Division.
Schumacher, B.A. and Zintek, L. (2014). The verification of a method for detecting and quantifying
diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, 2-butoxyethanol and 2-methoxyethanol in
ground and surface waters. EPA Report, EPA/600/R-14/008.
Shouakar-Stash, O. (2008). Evaluation of Stable Chlorine and Bromine Isotopes in Sedimentary
Formation Fluids. PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 355 pp.
Standard Method 3500-Fe B Fe Iron (Colorimetric). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater.
Standard Method 4500-S2"D for Wastewater. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater.
92
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Stepovik, L.P. and Potkina, A.Y. (2013). Oxidation of alkylarene CH Bonds by tert-butyl hydroperoxide in
the presence of cobalt, chromium, and vanadium acetylacetonates. Russian Journal of General
Chemistry, v. 83, p. 1047-1059.
Stiles, R., Yang, I., Lippincott, R.L., Murphy, E., and Buckley, B. (2008). Measurement of drinking water
contaminants by solid phase microextraction initially quantified in source water samples by the U.S.
Geological Survey. Environmental Science and Technology, v. 42, p. 2976-2981.
Stilwell, D.P., Elser, A.M., and Davis-Lawrence, S.W. (2009). Reasonable Foreseeable Development
Scenario for Oil and Gas Activities on Bureau Managed Lands in the North Dakota Study Area. Final
Report. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Wyoming State Office.
Reservoir Management Group, 229 pp.
Stoessell, R.K. (1997). Delineating the chemical composition of the salinity source for saline ground
waters: An example from East-Central Concordia Parish, Louisiana. Ground Water, v. 35, p. 409-417.
Teil, M.J., Blanchard, M., Moreau-Guigon, E., Dargnat, C, Alliot, F., Bourges, C., and Chevreuil, M. (2013).
Phthalate fate in the hydrographic network of the River Seine Basin (France) under contrasted
hydrological conditions. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, v. 224, p. 1-14.
Terracon (2011a). Remedial Investigation Work Plan: Franchuk 44-20 SWH Well Release. Submitted to:
Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. Baton Rouge. Document provided by Kris Roberts, North Dakota Department
of Health on April 19, 2011.
Terracon (2011b). Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP):
Franchuk 44-20 SWH Well Release. Submitted to: Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. Baton Rouge. Document
provided by Kris Roberts, North Dakota Department of Health on April 19, 2011.
Terracon (2013). Semi-Annual Report, October 2012 Sampling Event, Franchuk 44-20 SWH Well Release,
SE % Section 20, T MSN, R95W, 5th P.M., Killdeer, Dunn County, North Dakota. Submitted to Denbury
Onshore, L.L.C. Terracon Job No: 26107069.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012). Population Division Table 3. Cumulative Estimates of Resident Population
Change for the United States, States, Counties, Puerto Rico, and Puerto Rico Municipios: April 1, 2010 to
July 1, 2011 (MAPS-EST2011-03). Available at:
http://www.census.gov/popest/data/maps/2011/Countv-Density-ll.html. Accessed on October 31,
2013.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2013). Web Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation
Service. Available at: http://websoilsurvev.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed on
December 18, 2013.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (USEIA) (2014). Crude Oil Production. Available at:
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet crd crpdn adc mbbl a.htm. Accessed on June 17, 2014.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Method 360.1 (1971). Oxygen, Dissolved (Membrane
Electrode), 2 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 170.1 (1974). Temperature, 1 pp.
93
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 310.1 (1978a). Alkalinity (Titrimetric, pH 4.5), 3 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 353.1 (1978b). Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite (Colorimetric,
Automated, Hydrazine Reduction), 5 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 120.1 (1982a). Conductance (Specific Conductance,
umhos at 25°C), 3 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 150.2 (1982b). pH, Continuous Monitoring
(Electrometric), 3 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1992). Guidance for data usability in risk assessment (Part A).
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 9285.7-09A.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 180.1 (1993a). Determination of Turbidity by
Nephelometry, 10 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 350.1 (1993b). Determination of Ammonia Nitrogen by
Semi-Automated Colorimetry, 15 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 200.7 (1994a). Determination of Metals and Trace
Elements in Water and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, 58 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 7470A (1994b). Mercury in Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-
Vapor Technique), 6pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8015B (1996a). Nonhalogenated Organics Using GC/FID,
28pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260B (1996b). Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), 86 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000a). Stressor Identification Guidance Document. Office of
Water. Office of Research and Development. National Exposure Research Laboratory.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000b). Assigning values to non-detected/non-quantified
pesticide residues in human health food exposure assessments. Office of Pesticide Programs.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 5021A (2003). Volatile Organic Compounds in Various
Sample Matrices Using Equilibrium Headspace Analysis, 25 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 9060a (2004). Total Organic Carbon, 5 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 3015A (2007). Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of
Aqueous samples and Extracts, 25 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 6020A (2007a). Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry, 30 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 6500 (2007b). Dissolved Inorganic Anions in Aqueous
Matrices by Capillary Ion Electrophoresis, 37 pp.
94
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8270D (2007c). Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), 72 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010a). Science Advisory Board Staff Office; Notification of a
Public Meeting of the Science Advisory Board; Environmental Engineering Committee Augmented for
the Evaluation and Comment on EPA's Proposed Research Approach for Studying the Potential
Relationships Between Hydraulic Fracturing and Drinking Water Resources. In Federal Register 75, No.
052, p. 13125. March 28, 2010.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010b). ProUCL version 4.1 user guide: Statistical software for
environmental applications for data sets with and without non-detect observations, EPA/600/R-07/041.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011a). Draft plan to study the potential impacts of hydraulic
fracturing on drinking water resources, EPA/600/D-11/001. February 2011.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011b). Plan to study the potential impacts of hydraulic
fracturing on drinking water resources, EPA/600/R-11/122. November 2011.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Study of the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on
drinking water resources. Progress Report. EPA/601/R-12/011. December 2012.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2002). Produced Waters Database. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S.
Geological Survey. Available at: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/prov/prodwat/. Last accessed on July 2013.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2011). What is the USGS National Water Data for the Nation
Site, http://help.waterdata.usgs.gov/faq/about-the-usgs-water-data-for-the-nation-site
U.S. Geological Survey (2012a). The National Land Cover Database. Available at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3020/fs2012-3020.pdf. Accessed on October 25, 2013.
U.S. Geological Survey (2012b). About the USGS Water Data for the Nation Site. Available at:
http://help.waterdata.usgs.gov/faq/about-the-usgs-water-data-for-the-nation-site
U.S. Geological Survey (2013). National Water Information System. Available at:
http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis. Accessed on July 11, 2013.
U.S. House of Representatives (2011). Chemicals Used in Hydraulic Fracturing. Prepared for: United
States House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce Minority Staff. Washington D.C.
Vengosh, A. and Pankratov, I. (1998). Chloride/bromide and chloride/fluoride ratios of domestic sewage
effluents and associated contaminated ground water. Ground Water, v. 36, p. 815-824.
Warner, N.R., Jackson, R.B., Darrah, T.H., Osborn, S.G., Down, A., Zhao, K., White, A., and Vengosh, A.
(2012). Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow
aquifers in Pennsylvania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p.11961-11966.
Wess, J., Ahlers, H., and Dobson, S. (1998). Concise international chemical assessment document 10: 2-
butoxyethanol. Prepared for the United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour
Organisation and the World Health Organization.
95
-------
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Wilson, J.T, Kaiser, P.M., and Adair, C. (2005). Monitored natural attenuation of MTBE as a risk
management option at leaking underground storage tank sites. USEPA, Office of Research and
Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory. EPA/600/R-04/1790.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). (2002). Problems associated with bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate detections in groundwater monitoring wells. Publication WA 1011, Rev. 2002, 5 pp.
Yeskis, D. and Zavala, B. (2002). Ground-water sampling guidelines for Superfund and RCRA project
managers. Ground Water Issue Paper, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, EPA542-S-02-001
96
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix A
QA/QC Summary
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC
May 2015
EPA/600/R-14/103
A-l
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table of Contents
Table of Contents A-2
A.I. Introduction A-5
A.I.I. July 2011 Sampling Event A-5
A.I.2. October 2011 Sampling Event A-5
A.I.3. October 2012 Sampling Event A-5
A.2. Chain of Custody A-6
A.3. Holding Times A-6
A.3.1. July 2011 Sampling A-6
A.3.2. October 2011 Sampling A-6
A.3.3. October 2012 Sampling A-6
A.4. Blank Samples Collected During Sampling A-6
A.4.1. July 2011 Sampling A-7
A.4.2. October 2011 Sampling A-8
A.4.3. October 2012 Sampling A-8
A.5. Duplicate Samples A-9
A.5.1. All Sampling Events A-9
A.6. Laboratory QA/QC Results and Data Usability Summary A-9
A.7. Double Laboratory Comparisons A-9
A.8. Performance Evaluation Samples A-9
A.9. QAPP Additions and Deviations A-10
A.9.1. July 2011 Sampling Event A-10
A.9.2. October 2011 Sampling Event A-ll
A.9.3. October 2012 Sampling Event A-ll
A.10. Field QA/QC A-ll
A.ll. Data Qualifiers A-12
A.12. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) A-12
A.13. Audits of Data Quality (ADQ) A-13
A.M. Laboratory Technical Systems Audits (TSA) A-14
A.15. Field TSAs A-14
A-2
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
List of Tables
Table Al Sample containers, preservation, and holding times for ground water samples from
Killdeer, ND A-17
Table A2 Field QC samples for groundwater analysis A-20
Table A3 DOC, DIG, Ammonia, and Anion Blanks A-21
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks A-23
Table A5 Total Metal Blanks A-29
Table A6 VOC Blanks A-33
Table A7 Low Molecular Weight Acid Blanks A-39
Table A8 Dissolved Gas Blanks A-40
Table A9 Glycol Blanks A-41
Table A10 sVOC Blanks A-42
Table All DRO/ GRO Blanks A-56
Table A12 Ethoxylated Alcohols, Alkylphenols and Acrylamide Blanks A-57
Table A13 DOC, DIG, Ammonia, and Anion Duplicates A-58
Table A14 Dissolved Metal Duplicates A-59
Table A15 Total Metal Duplicates A-62
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates A-65
Table A17 Low Molecular Weight Acid Duplicates A-73
Table A18 Dissolved Gas Duplicates A-74
Table A19 Glycol Duplicates A-75
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds A-76
Table A21 Diesel Range Organic Compounds and Gasoline Range Organic Compounds
Duplicates A-90
Table A22 O and H Stable Isotopes of Water Duplicates A-91
Table A23 Strontium Isotope Duplicates A-92
Table A24 Ethoxylated Alcohols, Alkylphenols and Acrylamide Duplicates A-93
Table A25 Data Usability Summary A-94
A-3
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table A26 Data Qualifiers and Data Descriptors A-105
Table A27 Field QC data for YSI electrode measurements A-106
Table A28 Tentatively identified compounds (TICs) for sVOCs A-108
Table A29 QA/QC Narrative Associated with the Killdeer Field TSA A-lll
A-4
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
A.I. Introduction
This section describes general quality assurance (QA) and results of quality control (QC) samples,
including discussion of chain of custody, holding times, blank results, field duplicate results, laboratory
QA/QC results, data usability, performance evaluation (PE) samples, Quality Assurance Project Plan
(QAPP) additions and deviations, field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), application of data
qualifiers, tentatively identified compounds (TICs), Audits of Data Quality (ADQ), laboratory and field
Technical System Audits (TSA).
All reported data met project requirements unless otherwise indicated by application of data qualifiers.
In some cases, data were rejected as unusable and not reported.
A.I.I. July 2011 Sampling Event
The sampling and analytical activities for the July 2011 sampling event were conducted under a QAPP
titled "Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND,"
revision 0, approved on June 20, 2011. Deviations from this QAPP are described in Section A9. Nine
monitoring wells, one municipal supply well, two supply wells, three domestic wells, and one state well
were sampled during this event. A total of 282 samples were collected and delivered to four
laboratories for analysis: Shaw Environmental, Ada, OK; EPA Office of Research and
Development/National Risk Management Research Laboratory (ORD/NRMRL), Ada OK; EPA Region 8,
Golden, CO; and EPA Region 3, Fort Meade, MD. More than 215 analytes were measured per sampling
location. Of the 282 samples collected, 90 samples (32%) were QC samples, including blanks, field
duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates.
A.I.2. October 2011 Sampling Event
The October 2011 sampling and analytical activities were conducted under an approved QAPP,
"Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND," revision
1, approved August 29, 2011. Deviations from this QAPP are described in Section A9. Nine monitoring
wells, one municipal supply well, two supply wells, three domestic wells, and one state well were
sampled during this event. A total of 336 samples were collected and delivered to six laboratories for
analysis: Shaw Environmental, Ada, OK; EPA ORD/NRMRL, Ada OK; EPA Region 8, Golden, CO; EPA
Region 3, Fort Meade, MD; EPAORD/National Exposure Research Lab (NERL), Las Vegas, NV; and U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) Laboratory, Denver, CO. More than 228 analytes were measured per sampling
location. Of the 336 samples collected, 85 samples (25%) were QC samples, including blanks, field
duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates.
A.1.3. October 2012 Sampling Event
The October 2012 sampling and analytical activities were conducted under an approved QAPP,
"Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND," revision
1, approved August 29, 2011. An addendum to the QAPP was prepared to document QC acceptance
criteria for analysis of samples for metals using a different laboratory from the one used on the previous
sampling events, "Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn
County: Analysis of Samples by the EPA Region VII Contract Laboratory for the October 2012 Sampling
A-5
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Event, Revision 1 Addendum/' approved on February 25, 2013. Deviations from this QAPP are described
in Section A9. Nine monitoring wells and one state well were sampled during this event. A total of 255
samples were collected and delivered to six laboratories for analysis: Shaw Environmental, Ada, OK; EPA
ORD/NRMRL, Ada OK; EPA Region 8, Golden, CO; EPA ORD/NERL, Las Vegas, NV; Southwest Research
Institute Laboratory, San Antonio, TX; and USGS Laboratory, Denver, CO. More than 230 analytes were
measured per sampling location. Of the 255 samples, 76 samples (30%) were QC samples, including
blanks, field duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates.
A final version of the QAPP titled "Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer
and Dunn County, ND," revision 2, was approved on December 13, 2013.
A.2. Chain of Custody
Sample types, bottle types, sample preservation methods, analyte holding times, and laboratories
receiving samples are listed in Table Al. Samples collected in the field were packed on ice into ice
chests for shipment by overnight delivery along with completed chain-of-custody (COC) documents and
temperature blank containers. Samples were received by the laboratories in good condition, and all
temperature blanks were less than 6°C. There were no chain of custody issues that had an impact on
data quality.
A.3. Holding Times
Holding times are the length of time a sample can be stored after collection and prior to analysis without
significantly affecting the analytical results. Holding times vary with the analyte, sample matrix, and
analytical methodology. Sample holding times for the various analyses conducted in this investigation
are listed in Table Al and range from seven days to six months. Generally, the estimated analyte
concentration for samples with holding time exceedances are biased low.
A.3.1. July 2011 Sampling
All samples met holding times.
A.3.2. October 2011 Sampling
Sample NDGW07 was re-analyzed for bromide twelve days past its holding time. Sample result is
qualified with an "H" and could have a potential negative bias.
A.3.3. October 2012 Sampling
All samples met holding times.
A.4. Blank Samples Collected During Sampling
An extensive series of blank samples were collected during all sampling events, including field blanks,
equipment blanks, and trip blanks (see Table A2). These QC samples were intended to test for possible
bias from potential sources of contamination during field sample collection, equipment cleaning, sample
bottle transportation to and from the field, and laboratory procedures. The same source water was
used for the preparation of all blank samples (Barnstead NANOpure Diamond UV water). Field blanks
were collected to evaluate potential contamination from sample bottles and environmental sources.
A-6
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Equipment blanks were collected to determine whether cleaning procedures or sample equipment
(filters, fittings, tubing) potentially contributed to analyte detections. Trip blanks consisted of serum
bottles or volatile organic compound (VOC) vials filled with NANOpure water and sealed in the
laboratory. Trip blanks were used to evaluate whether VOCs and dissolved gas serum bottles were
contaminated during sample storage, sampling, or shipment to and from the field. All other analyses
had associated field and equipment blanks (when needed), except for isotope ratio analyses, for which
no blank sampling schemes are appropriate. Sample bottle types, preservation, and holding times were
applied to blank samples in the same way as they were applied to field samples (see Table Al).
The following criteria were used to qualify samples with potential blank contamination. Sample
contamination is considered possible if analyte concentrations in blanks are above the method
quantitation limit (QL) and if the analyte is present in an associated field sample at a level <10 times the
concentration in the blank. In cases where both a sample and its associated laboratory, equipment, or
field blank are between the method detection limit (MDL) and the QL, the sample results are reported
as
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
QL, therefore the sample was not impacted. The EPA Region 8 Laboratory analyzed the blanks samples
for GRO and DRO and found that the source water used to collect the field blank samples was
contaminated with cyclohexane.
A.4.2. October 2011 Sampling
All of the blanks collected for acetate analysis had concentrations of acetate higher than the QL (see
Table A7). With the exceptions of samples NDGW02-102011 and NDGW07-102011, all data for acetate
was qualified with "B"; samples NDGW02-102011 and NDGW07-102011 did not have detectable
concentrations of acetate and did not require quantification. The source of the acetate was later
determined to be the trisodium phosphate (TSP) preservative.
The field and trip blanks collected on October 18, 2011, were rejected and qualified with "R" for
dissolved gases as the result of carryover from standards analyzed prior to these blanks (see Table A8).
The results for samples collected on this date that were above the QL were qualified because it is not
known if the data quality had been impacted. This affected methane samples from NDGW07-102011,
NDGW08-102011, NDGW09-102011, and NDGW14-102011, and the ethane sample from NDGW08-
102011. No samples for propane or butane were affected since the samples for these analytes were
below the QL.
There were no detectable concentrations of SVOCs in any of the field blank samples (see Table A10).
Therefore, there was no impact on data quality measured by blanks. However, a laboratory method
blank had bis-(2-ethylhexylphthalate). Affected samples (NDGW03-102011, NDGW04-102011,
NDGW05-102011, NDGW06-102011, NDGW07-102011, NDGW08-102011, NDGW09-102011, and
NDGW14-102011) are qualified with a "B".
The ethoxylates, alkylphenols, and acrylamide blanks showed no detectable concentrations except for
nonylphenol ethoxylate and the ethoxylate alcohols C13 (see Table A12). It should be noted that only
four samples were collected for this analysis. The concentration of nonylphenol ethoxylate in the blank
sample was at the QL. Therefore, all samples (NDGW04-102011, NDGW07-102011, NDGW08-102011,
and NDGW09-102011) were qualified with a "B." In the case of the ethoxylated alcohols C13 blank, the
concentration was greater than the QL. Samples NDGW04-102011, NDGW07-102011, and NDGW08-
102011 were qualified with a "B." It is likely that the contamination was from the glass bottles used for
the collection of samples.
A.4.3. October 2012 Sampling
Both equipment blanks had concentrations of dissolved Ni above the QL, and the following samples had
concentrations less than 10 times the concentration in the blanks: NDGW01-102012, NDGW02-102012,
NDGW03-102012, NDGW04-102012, NDGW05-102012, NDGW06-102012, NDGW09-102012, NDGW09-
102012 DUP, and NDGW14-102012. Therefore, these samples were qualified with a "B" qualifier.
Formate was detected in the blanks (see Table A7). All field blanks had concentrations of formate
similar to the concentrations in the samples. This likely indicates sample container contamination and
the formate data were rejected and qualified with "R."
A-8
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
The ethoxylates, and alkylphenols blanks indicated most of the samples were contaminated (see Table
A12), and all data for ethoxylates and alkylphenols were rejected and were qualified with "R."
A.5. Duplicate Samples
Field duplicate samples were collected to measure the reproducibility and precision of field sampling
and analytical procedures. The RPD was calculated to compare concentration differences between the
primary (sample 1) and duplicate sample (sample 2) using the following equation:
100
(sample 1 + sample 2)
RPDs were calculated when the constituents in both the primary sample and duplicate sample were >5
times the method QLs. Constituents were qualified with a "*" if RPDs were >30%.
A.5.1. All Sampling Events
There were no qualifications required based on RPDs for field duplicates not meeting the 30% criterion.
A.6. Laboratory QA/QC Results and Data Usability Summary
The QA/QC requirements for laboratory analyses conducted as part of this case study are provided in
the QAPPs. Table A25 summarizes laboratory QA/QC results regarding sample analysis, i.e., laboratory
duplicate analysis, laboratory blank analysis, matrix spike results, calibration, continuing calibration
checks, and field QC. Impacts on data quality of any issues noted in the QA narratives are also
presented in Table A25. Data qualifiers are listed in Table A26. Many of the specific QA/QC
observations noted in the ADQs are summarized in Table A25.
A majority of the reported data met project requirements. Data that did not meet QA/QC requirements
specified in the QAPP are indicated by the application of data qualifiers in the final data summaries. Data
determined to be unusable were rejected and qualified with an "R." Depending on the data qualifier,
data usability is affected to varying degrees. For example, data qualified with a "B" would not be
appropriate to use when the sample concentration is below the blank concentration. But as the sample
data increase in concentration and approach lOx the blank concentration, they may be more
appropriate to use. Data with a "J" flag is usable with the understanding that it is an approximate
concentration, but the analyte is positively identified. A "J+" or "J-" qualifier indicates a potential
positive or negative bias, respectively. An "H" qualifier, for exceeding sample holding time, is considered
a negative bias. An "*" indicates that the data are less precise than project requirements. Each case is
evaluated to determine the extent that data are usable or not (see Table A25).
A.7. Double Laboratory Comparisons
There were no double-laboratory comparisons for the July 2011, October 2011, or October 2012 events.
A.8. Performance Evaluation Samples
A series of performance evaluation (PE) samples were analyzed by the laboratories conducting critical
analyses to support the HF Retrospective Case Studies. The PE samples were analyzed as part of the
A-9
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
normal QA/QC standard operating procedures, and in the case of certified labs, as part of the
certification process to maintain certification for that laboratory. The results of the PE tests are
presented in tabular form in the Wise County, Texas, Retrospective Case Study QA/QA Appendix and are
not repeated here. These tables show the results of 1,354 tests; 98.6% of the reported values fell within
the acceptance range. For the ORD/NRMRL Laboratory, a total of 95 tests were performed, with 96.9%
of the reported values falling within the acceptable range. Similarly, for the Shaw Environmental
Laboratory, a total of 835 tests were performed, with 98.7% of the reported values falling within the
acceptable range. The EPA Region 8 Laboratory had a total of 424 tests performed, with 98.8% of the
reported values falling within the acceptable range. These PE sample results demonstrate the high
quality of the analytical data reported here. Analytes not falling within the acceptable range were
examined, and corrective action was undertaken to ensure data quality in future analysis.
A.9. QAPP Additions and Deviations
The July 2011 sampling was conducted using the Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken
Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND, rev. 0 QAPP. The October 2011 sampling was conducted using the
Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND, rev. 1
QAPP. The October 2012 sampling was conducted using the Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case
Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND, rev. 1 QAPP and the Hydraulic Fracturing
Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County: Analysis of Samples by the EPA
Region VII Contract Laboratory for the October 2012 Sampling Event, Revision 1, Addendum QAPP.
A.9.1. July 2011 Sampling Event.
A deviation from the QAPP for this event was the sampling of the supply wells. At the time the QAPP
was written, the EPA did not know how these wells were set up for sampling, so a general description
was used. The depot wells required the use of a split-flow system, with the sample collected from the
side stream that was adjusted to reasonable flow rates for sampling. The well was purged into a tanker
truck before sampling. The manifold used was decontaminated between sampling locations. A split
sample was collected for field parameters at the same time laboratory samples were collected, since the
volume of water that could be collected from the aquifer was limited. Filtered samples were first
collected into clean bottles. Once all the samples were collected, the samples were filtered into new
clean bottles to be shipped to the laboratories doing the analysis. This change in sampling methodology
was incorporated into revision 1 of the QAPP.
An additional deviation from the QAPP was that the ICP-MS metals data were not reported. These data
were not reported because of concerns with data quality. The reasons stated were potential
interferences and that interference check standards were not run. Instead, ICP-OES data were reported
for the ICP-MS metals As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, and U.
A final deviation from the QAPP was that the midday calibration check for the field data was not done
on July 19, 2011. However, the initial and end-of-day calibration checks were acceptable, so it is unlikely
that there was an impact on the data.
A-10
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
A.9.2. October 2011 Sampling Event
The alkylphenols, ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated alkylphenols, and acrylamide analyses were added
after the Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale, Killdeer and Dunn County, ND,
rev. 1 QAPP revision was approved. The ORD/NERL Laboratory did not have the method ready to accept
samples until a few days prior to the sampling. [Note: This was addressed in the next revision of the
QAPP for these analytes.]
A deviation from the QAPP was that all of the ICP-MS metals data were not reported. These data were
not reported because of concerns with data quality. Instead, ICP-OES data were reported for the ICP-MS
metals As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, and U.
Finally, there was no midday or end-of-day calibration check for the field data on October 19, 2011. The
sampling was completed at midday, but because of an accidental spill of the YSI 5580 Confidence
Solution, no calibration check could be performed for field parameters. The measurements for pH, ORP,
and specific conductance were not qualified but are considered usable as estimates.
A.9.3. October 2012 Sampling Event
The QAPP used for this sampling event was Hydraulic Fracturing Retrospective Case Study, Bakken Shale,
Killdeer and Dunn County, ND, rev. 1 QAPP which addressed the sampling and all analyses except for
metals. A deviation from this QAPP was that the metals were analyzed by a different laboratory than the
one used in previous sampling events. The laboratory is a contract laboratory for EPA Region 7. The
contract Statement of Work detailing the QA/QC requirements was approved prior to the sampling
event. These requirements were subsequently documented in the Addendum to revision 1 of the QAPP.
The field parameter measurements using the YSI meter were problematic because of a faulty sensor
(see Section A10.2). The affected parameters were pH, specific conductivity (SpC), temperature,
dissolved oxygen (DO), and oxygen-reduction potential (ORP). The PI chose to use data for these
parameters that had been collected by Terracon and the state. Because the PI did not know the
calibration and calibration checks frequency used by Terracon and the state, this deviation from the
QAPP required that measurements for these parameters be qualified using the "J" qualifier, indicating
that these were estimated, but the impact was likely minimal.
A.10. Field QA/QC
Field measurements consisted of YSI Model 556 flow-cell readings for temperature, SpC, pH, ORP, and
DO. YSI electrodes were calibrated in the morning, and performance checks were generally conducted
after initial calibration, at midday, and at the end of each day (see Table A27) using the YSI 5580
Confidence Solution to conduct the performance checks for SpC, ORP, and pH. NIST-traceable buffer
solutions (4.00, 7.00, and 10.01) were used for pH calibration. The YSI ORP standard was used to
calibrate redox potential measurements. The YSI conductivity standard was used to calibrate specific
conductance measurements. DO sensors were calibrated with air. Prior to field deployment the
electrode assembly and meter were checked to ensure they were in good working order. In most cases,
performance checks were within acceptance limits checks (Table A27).
A-ll
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Field parameters for this case study consisted of turbidity, alkalinity, total dissolved sulfide species
(IH2S), and ferrous iron. Because field measurements of ferrous iron and dissolved sulfide sometimes
required dilution and all sample preparations and measurements were made in an uncontrolled
environment (i.e., the field), concentration data for these parameters were qualified in all cases as
estimated. Turbidity was measured using a HACH 2100Q Portable Turbimeter and was calibrated using
HACH 2100Q StablCal Calibration Set. The HACH 2100Q StablCal Calibration Set consists of the 20
nephelometric unit (NTU), 100 NTU, and 800 NTU standards, with a 10 NTU calibration verification
standard. For alkalinity measurements, a HACH Model AL-DT Digital Titrator was used. The total
dissolved sulfide species and ferrous iron measurements were collected using a HACH DR890 Portable
Colorimeter. The equipment for measuring alkalinity, total dissolved sulfide species, and ferrous iron
measurement accuracy was verified in the lab prior to field deployment using known standards. In the
field, a blank sample was measured to ensure no cross contamination occurred. In the field, a blank
sample also was measured for turbidity, and a 10 NTU standard was also used to verify the calibration.
These checks were performed after initial calibration, at midday, and at the end of the day.
A.ll. Data Qualifiers
Data qualifiers are listed in Table A26. Many factors can affect the quality of data reported for
environmental samples, including factors related to sample collection in the field, transport of samples
to laboratories, and the work conducted by the various analytical laboratories. The list of qualifiers in
Table A26 is based on the Data Qualifier Definitions presented in the EPA Contract Laboratory Program
(CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review (US EPA/540/R-01,
2008), and the EPA CLP National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Inorganic Methods Data Review
(US EPA/540/R/10/011, 2010), with the addition of data qualifiers H and B, which are necessary for
communicating issues that occur during analysis in laboratories not bound by the CLP statement of
work. The R qualifier is used in cases where it is determined that data need to be rejected. Data
rejection can occur for many reasons, which must be explained in QA/QC narratives. Conditions
regarding the application of qualifiers include:
If the analyte was not detected, then it was reported as QL).
A.12. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)
The EPA Region 8 Laboratory reported TICs from SVOC analyses. Several SVOC TICs were identified in
samples and blanks (see Table A28). To be identified as a TIC, a peak had to have an area at least 10% as
large as the area of the nearest internal standard and a match quality greater than 80. The TIC match
A-12
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
quality is based on the number and ratio of the major fragmentation ions. A perfect match has a value
of 99. Although the TIC report is essentially a qualitative report, an estimated concentration is
calculated based on a response factor of 1.00 and the area of the nearest internal standard. The search
for TICs includes the whole chromatogram from approximately 3.0 to 41.0 minutes for SVOCs. TICs are
compounds that can be detected, but without the analysis of standards, cannot be confirmed or reliably
quantified. Oftentimes, TICs are representative of a class of compounds rather than indicating a specific
compound. Only the top TIC is reported for each peak.
A.13. Audits of Data Quality (ADQ)
An ADQ was performed per the EPA/NRMRL Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), Performing Audits of
Data Quality (ADQs), to verify that requirements of the QAPP were properly implemented for the
analysis of critical analytes for samples submitted to laboratories identified in the QAPP associated with
this project. The ADQs were performed by Neptune and Company, Inc., and reviewed by NRMRL QA
staff. However, NRMRL QA staff also performed an ADQ on metals for the October 2011 sampling
event. NRMRL QA staff provided the ADQ results to the project's Pis for response and assisted in the
implementation of corrective actions. The ADQ process is an important element of Category I (highest
of four levels in EPA ORD) Quality Assurance Projects, which this study has operated under for all
aspects of groundwater collection and analysis.
Complete data packages were provided to the auditors for the July 2011, October 2011, and October
2012 sampling events. A complete data package consists of the following: sample information, method
information, data summary, laboratory reports, raw data (including QC results), and data qualifiers. The
QAPP was used to identify data quality indicator requirements and goals, and a checklist was prepared
based on the types of data collected. The data packages were reviewed against the checklist by tracing
a representative set of the data in detail from raw data and instrument readouts through data
transcription or transference through data manipulation (either manually or electronically by
commercial or customized software) through data reduction to summary data, data calculations, and
final reported data. All calibration and QA/QC data were reviewed for all available data packages. Data
summary spreadsheets prepared by the PI were also reviewed to determine whether data had been
accurately transcribed from lab summary reports and appropriately qualified, based on lab and field QC
results.
The critical analytes, as identified in the QAPP, were GROs; DROs; SVOCs; VOCs, including isopropyl
alcohol, tert-butyl alcohol, and naphthalene; dissolved gases (methane, ethane, propane, and butane);
trace elements (As, Se, Sr, Ba, and B); major cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K); and major anions (Cl, nitrate +
nitrite, SO4). Also included in the ADQ were the following analytes: all metals analyzed and glycols. The
non-conformances identified in an ADQ can consist of the following categories: a finding (a deficiency
that has or may have a significant effect on the quality of the reported results; a corrective action
response is required), or an observation (a deficiency that does not have a significant effect on the
quality of the reported results; a corrective action response is required). The ADQ for the July 2011
sampling event had nine observations, and the October 2011 sampling event had three findings and four
observations. The ADQ for the October 2012 sampling event had no findings and twenty-one
A-13
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
observations. In most cases, ADQfindings and observations are included in Table A25 along with the
corrective actions taken and data qualifications.
A.14. Laboratory Technical Systems Audits (TSA)
Laboratory Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) were conducted early in the project to allow for
identification and correction of any issues that may affect data quality. Laboratory TSAs focused on the
critical target analytes. Laboratory TSAs were conducted on-site at ORD/NRMRL Laboratory and Shaw
Environmental [both laboratories are located at the Robert S. Kerr Research Center, Ada, OK] and at the
EPA Region 8 Laboratory (Golden, CO) which analyzed for sVOCs, DRO and GRO. Detailed checklists,
based on the procedures and requirements specified in the QAPP, related SOPs, and EPA Methods, were
prepared and used during the TSAs. These audits were conducted with contract support from Neptune
and Co., with oversight by NRMRL QA Staff. The QA Manager tracked implementation and completion
of any necessary corrective actions. The TSAs took place in July 2011. The TSAs found good QA
practices in place at each laboratory. There were no findings and six observations across the three
laboratories audited. All observations were resolved through corrective actions. The observations had
no impact on the sample data quality.
A.15. Field TSAs
For Category 1 QA projects, TSAs are conducted on both field and laboratory activities. Detailed
checklists based on the procedures and requirements specified in the QAPP, SOPs, and EPA Methods
were prepared and used during the TSAs. The field TSA took place during the first sampling event in July
2011 (audit date: July 19, 2011). The results of the audit and the corrective actions are included in Table
A29.
The sample collection, documentation, field measurements (and calibration), and sample handling,
including sample custody and COC operations, were generally performed according to the QAPP.
Municipal wells and depot wells required using a split-flow system, with the sample collected from the
side stream that was adjusted for flow. The well was purged prior to sampling, with the main flow into a
storage truck. However, the total flow was not a parameter that could be adjusted by the samplers.
The sample stream was adjusted to a reasonable flow by using the valve on the manifold. This manifold
was cleaned by Terracon between sample locations. In general, Terracon was first to collect their
samples, followed by the collection of EPA samples. The level of drawdown could not be monitored for
the wells that were sampled during this TSA. Field parameter measurements (pH, ORP, SpC, DO,
temperature, etc.) could not be measured until after the samples for laboratory analysis were collected
due to the nature of the wells. The field parameters were measured using a calibrated YSI 556 MSP and
Hach kits, depending upon the parameter, as described in the QAPP. Filtered samples also required first
collecting an unfiltered sample, as described in the QAPP. New filters and new pieces of tubing were
used at each sampling location. Field QC samples were also collected. In the field it was not possible to
review every COC against the QAPP due to the nature of sampling and sample packaging, but these
custody documents are available at the respective laboratories and copies were provided with the
laboratory data packages.
A-14
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Documentation that was reviewed during the ISA for sampling conducted on the monitoring wells the
day prior indicates the QAPP procedures were also followed. Field parameters were measured while
purging, and the purge rate and time were documented. Water levels were also recorded before and
after purging. The monitoring wells were sampled after purging while monitoring for field parameters
(e.g., pH, ORP, SpC, DO, and temperature).
One observation was noted concerning documentation of the YSI Confidence Solution, which was
corrected at the time of the audit; no findings were identified. A summary of the audit and corrective
actions are given in Table A29.
A-15
-------
Appendix A QA/QC Summary, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix A Tables
A-16
-------
A-17
Table Al Sample containers, preservation, and holding times for ground water samples from Killdeer,
ND
Holding Sampling
Sample Type Analysis Method (Lab Method) Sample Bottles/ # of bottles1 Preservation/ Storage Time(s) Rounds2
Dissolved gases
Dissolved Metals (Filtered)
Dissolved Metals (Filtered)
Dissolved Hg (Filtered)
Total Metals (Unfiltered)
Total Metals (Unfiltered)
Total Hg (Unfiltered)
Sulfate (SO4), Chloride (Cl),
Fluoride (F), Bromide (Br)
Br
Br
Shaw Environmental: No US EPA
Method (RSKSOP-194v4 &-175v5)
Shaw Environmental: US EPA
Methods 200.7 & 6020A
(RSKSOP-213v4 & -257v2 or -
332vO)
EPA Region 7 RASP Contract
Southwest Research Institute: US
EPA Methods 200.7 & 6020A
EPA Region 7 RASP Contract
Southwest Research Institute: US
EPA Method 7470A
Shaw Environmental: Analysis- US
EPA Methods 200.7 & 6020A
(RSKSOP-213v4 & -257v2 or -
332vO); and Digestion- US EPA
Method 3015A (RSKSOP-179v3)
EPA Region 7 RASP Contract
Southwest Research Institute: US
EPA Methods 200.7 & 6020A; and
Digestion US EPA Method 200.7
EPA Region 7 RASP Contract
Southwest Research Institute: US
EPA Method 7470A; and
Digestion US EPA Method 200.7
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 6500 (RSKSOP-276v3)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): No US EPA
Method (RSKSOP-214v5)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 6500 (RSKSOP-288v3)
60 mL serum bottles/2
125 mL plastic bottle/1
1 L plastic bottle/1
1 L plastic bottle/1
125 mL plastic bottle/1
1 L plastic bottle/1
1 L plastic bottle/1
60 mL plastic bottle/1
60 mL plastic bottle/1
60 mL plastic bottle/1
No headspaceTSP3, pH
>10; refrigerate <6°C4
HNO3, pH<2
HNO3, pH<2
HNO3, pH<2
HNO3, pH<2
HNO3, pH<2
HNO3, pH<2
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
14 days
6 months (Hg
28 days)
6 months
28 days
6 months
6 months
28 days
28 days
28 days
28 days
1,2,3
1,2
3
3
1,2
3
3
1,2
2
3
-------
A-18
Table Al Sample containers, preservation, and holding times for ground water samples from Killdeer,
ND
Holding Sampling
Sample Type Analysis Method (Lab Method) Sample Bottles/ # of bottles1 Preservation/ Storage Time(s) Rounds2
Iodide (1)
Nitrate+Nitrite (NO3+NO2)
Ammonia (NH3)
Dissolved Inorganic Carbon
(DIG)
Dissolved Organic Carbon
(DOC)
Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC)
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Semi-volatile organic
compounds (sVOC)
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
Gasoline Range Organics
(GRO)
Glycols
Glycols
87Sr/86Sr Isotope Analysis
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): No US EPA
Method (RSKSOP-223v2)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 353.1 (RSKSOP-214v5)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 350.1 (RSKSOP-214v5)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 9060A (RSKSOP-330vO)
ORD/NRMRL(Ada): US EPA
Method 9060A (RSKSOP-330vO)
Shaw Environmental: US EPA
Method 5021A+ 8260C (RSKSOP-
299vl)
Shaw Environmental: No US EPA
Method (RSKSOP-112v6)
EPA Region 8: US EPA Method
8270D (ORGM-515 rl.l)
EPA Region 8: US EPA Method
8015D (ORGM-508 rl.O)
EPA Region 8: US EPA Method
8015D (ORGM-506 rl.O)
EPA Region 3: No US EPA
Method (R3 Method5)
ORD/NERL (Las Vegas): No US
EPA Method (R3 Method5)
USGS: No US EPA Method
(Thermal ionization mass
spectrometry)
60 mL plastic bottle/1
60 mL plastic bottle/1
60 mL plastic bottle/1
40 mL clear glass VOA vial/2
40 mL clear glass VOA vial/2
40 mL amber glass VOA vial/2
40 mL amber glass VOA vial/2
1 L amber glass bottle/2
1L amber glass bottle/2
40 mL amber VOA vial/2
40 mL amber VOA vial/2
40 mL amber VOA vial/2
500 mL plastic bottle/2
Refrigerate <6°C
H2SO4, pH <2;
refrigerate <6°C
H2SO4, pH <2;
refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
H3P04, pH<2;
Refrigerate <6°C
No headspaceTSP3, pH
>10; refrigerate <6°C
TSP3, pH >10;
refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
HCL, pH <2; refrigerate
<6°C
No headspace HCL, pH
<2; refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
28 days
28 days
28 days
14 days
28 days
14 days
30 days
7 days
extraction, 30
days after
extraction
7 days
extraction, 40
days after
extraction
14 days
14 days
14 days
6 months
3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2
3
2,3
-------
A-19
Table Al Sample containers, preservation, and holding times for ground water samples from Killdeer,
ND
Holding Sampling
Sample Type Analysis Method (Lab Method) Sample Bottles/ # of bottles1 Preservation/ Storage Time(s) Rounds2
Acrylamide
Alkylphenols, ethoxylated
alcohols, ethoxylated
alkylphenols
O, H stable isotopes of water
ORD/NERL (Las Vegas): No US
EPA Method (ORD/NERL
Method6)
ORD/NERL (Las Vegas): No US
EPA Method (ORD/NERL
Method6)
Shaw Environmental: No US EPA
Method (RSKSOP-334vO)
1 L amber glass bottle/2
1 L amber glass bottle/2
20 ml glass VOA vial/1
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
Refrigerate <6°C
30 days
30 days
Stable
27, 3
27,3
2,3
Spare bottles made available for laboratory QC samples and for replacement of compromised samples (broken bottle, QC failures, etc.).
2 Sampling rounds occurred in July 2011, October 2011, and October 2012.
3 Trisodium phosphate.
4 Above freezing point of water.
5 US EPA Methods 8000C and 8321 were followed for method development and QA/QC; method based on ASTM D773-11.
6 Methods modified from ASTD D7458-09 and USGS method 01433-01 for ethoxylated alcohols and alkylphenols; US EPA Method 8032A and 8316 were used for acrylamide.
7 Limited sampling of select wells: NDGW04-102011, NDGW07-102011, NDGW08-102011, and NDGW09-102011.
-------
A-20
Table A2 Field QC samples for groundwater analysis
QC Sample
Trip Blanks (VOCsand
Dissolved Gases only
Equipment Blanks
Field Blanks
Method
Frequency
Assess Contamination during
transportation.
Assess contamination from
field equipment, sampling
procedures, decontamination
procedures, sample
container, preservative, and
shipping.
Assess contamination
introduced from sample
container with applicable
preservation.
Fill bottles with reagent
water and preserve, take to
field and return without
opening.
Apply only to samples
collected via equipment2,
such as filtered samples:
Reagent water is filtered and
collected into bottles and
preserved same as filtered
samples.
In the field, reagent water is
collected into sample
containers with
preservatives.
One in an ice chest with VOA
and dissolved gas samples.
One per day of sampling.
One per day of sampling.
Acceptance Criteria /
Corrective Actions
QL, but<10Xthe
concentration found in the
blank.
Temperature Blanks
Measure temperature of
samples in the cooler.
Water sample that is
transported in cooler to lab.
One per cooler.
The temperature was
recorded by the receiving lab
upon receipt.4
Field Duplicates
Represent precision of field
sampling, analysis, and site
heterogeneity.
One or more samples
collected immediately after
original sample.
One in every 10 samples, or if
<10 samples collected for a
water type (ground or
surface), collect a duplicate
for one sample.
RPD<30% for results > 5X the
QL.
Affected data were flagged
as needed.
Reporting Limit (RL), or Quantitation Limit (QL). 2Reagent water was filtered, collected into bottles, and preserved at the same time as filtered water samples.
3Blank samples were not required for isotope measurements, including 1S0/160, H2/H, and 1BC/12C. 4The PI was notified if the samples arrived with no ice and/or if
the temperature recorded from the temperature blank was >6°C.
-------
A-21
Table A3 DOC, DIG, Ammonia, and Anion Blanks
July 2011
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank (1)
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
0.47
0.27
<0.50
NA
0.43
0.19
0.50
18/18
1.62
6.48
NR
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.02
1.00
18/18
70.2
201
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
7/18
0.05
9.94
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
8/18
0.01
0.29
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.14
1.00
8/18
0.47
2.03
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.07
1.00
18/18
0.84
2940
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.14
1.00
18/18
76.3
566
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.04
0.20
16/18
0.22
3.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
0.29
0.24
<1.00
<1.00
0.07
1.00
18/18
1.85
35.9
0.26
0.38
0.21
0.25
0.02
1.00
18/18
61.3
182
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.01
0.10
14/18
0.02
13.9
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
4/18
0.15
0.26
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.06
1.00
3/18
6.92
8.39
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.11
1.00
18/18
0.67
1760
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.05
1.00
18/18
76.7
596
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.03
0.20
16/18
0.16
2.98
NA
NA
NA
NA
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
Equipment Blankl-
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
10/17/2012
0.10
0.07
0.17
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
-------
A-22
Table A3 DOC, DIG, Ammonia, and Anion Blanks
102012
Equipment Blank2-
102012
10/18/2012
0.25
<1.00
<0.10
<0.10
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<0.20
<10.0
MDL
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.17
0.13
0.16
0.05
2.22
QL
0.50
1.00
0.10
0.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.20
10.0
Detections in samples
11/11
11/11
5/11
2/11
3/11
11/11
11/11
10/11
2/11
Concentration min
1.41
74.1
0.25
0.21
0.26
0.90
74.5
0.13
117
Concentration max
6.60
189
1.41
0.21
2.27
631
748
2.83
321
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
A-23
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
Sample ID
^^M^lL^iA^^E^H
1 JH iHH
July 2011
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank (1)
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in
samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<14
<14
<14
<14
<14
4
14
1/18
8
8
<494
<494
<494
<494
<494
148
494
0/18
<494
<494
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
6
20
0/18
<20
<20
<333
<333
<333
<333
<333
100
333
18/18
146
447
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
18/18
18
173
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
3
10
0/18
<10
<10
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
0.09
0.29
18/18
4
583
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
0/18
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
4/18
1
4
<7
<7
<7
<7
<7
2
7
0/18
<7
<7
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
6
20
4/18
7
16
<67
<67
<67
<67
<67
20
67
11/18
24
23700
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in
samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<14
<14
<14
<14
4
14
0/18
<14
<14
<494
<494
<494
<494
148
494
0/18
<494
<494
<20
<20
<20
<20
6
20
0/18
<20
<20
<333
<333
<333
<333
100
333
18/18
129
456
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
18/18
18
259
<10
<10
<10
<10
3
10
0/18
<10
<10
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
0.09
0.29
18/18
4
377
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
0/18
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
2/18
1
5
<7
<7
<7
<7
2
7
0/18
<7
<7
<20
<20
<20
<20
6
20
3/18
8
9
<67
<67
<67
<67
20
67
10/18
50
15600
NA
NA
NA
NA
October 2012
Field Blankl- 102012
Field Blank2-102012
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
4
<10
<20
<20
<0.2
<0.2
<40
<40
0.6
<5
<5
<5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.20
<0.20
<5
<5
<2.0
<2.0
<0.5
<0.5
<100
<100
<0.2
<0.2
-------
A-24
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
Equipment Blankl-
102012
Equipment Blank2-
102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
7
3
3
10
0/11
<10
<10
<20
3
3
20
3/11
7
11
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
0.2
5/11
.02
3.2
<40
<40
5
40
11/11
146
483
0.4
<5
0.4
5
11/11
17
102
<5
<5
0.2
5
0/11
<5
<5
<0.1
<0.1
0.02
0.1
11/11
3.36
149
<0.20
<0.20
0.20
0.20
0/11
<0.20
<0.20
<5
<5
2
5
2/11
4
10
<2.0
<2.0
0.3
2.0
6/11
0.5
3.0
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
11/11
0.30
1.1
<100
<100
40
100
10/11
40
6560
<0.2
<0.2
0.01
0.2
0/11
<0.2
<0.2
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
A-25
Units mg/L ug/L mg/L ug/L
ug/L mg/L ug/L mg/L ug/L ug/L
July 2011
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank (1)
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
0.11
0.35
18/18
2
15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.03
0.10
18/18
2
276
<14
<14
<14
<14
<14
4
14
17/18
11
1450
<17
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
7/18
18
31
<1.71
<1.71
<1.71
<1.71
<1.71
0.51
1.71
18/18
111
1040
<84
<84
<84
<84
<84
25
84
1/18
197
197
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
0.02
0.06
5/18
0.03
0.32
<17
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
0/18
<17
<17
<0.46
<0.46
<0.46
<0.46
<0.46
0.14
0.46
18/18
25
184
R
R
R
R
R
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
9
30
0/18
<30
<30
0.17
0.17
<0.43
0.16
<0.43
0.13
0.43
18/18
3.75
14
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
0.11
0.35
18/18
2.49
11
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.03
0.10
18/18
1.90
158
<14
<14
<14
<14
4
14
17/18
11
932
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
17/18
5
18
<1.71
<1.71
<1.71
<1.71
0.51
1.71
18/18
151
610
<84
<84
<84
<84
25
84
2/18
46
196
0.02
<0.06
<0.06
0.02
0.02
0.06
2/18
0.11
0.12
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
0/18
<17
<17
<0.46
<0.46
<0.46
<0.46
0.14
0.46
18/18
25.4
189
R
R
R
R
<30
<30
<30
<30
9
30
17/18
11
40
<0.43
<0.43
<0.43
<0.43
0.13
0.43
18/18
3.72
14
October 2012
Field Blankl- 102012
Field Blank2-102012
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<0.5
<0.5
<10
<10
0.01
<0.05
<5
<5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.25
<0.25
<0.20
<0.20
0.02
0.02
<0.20
<0.20
NA
NA
<0.20
<0.20
<2
<2
0.02
0.01
-------
A-26
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
_.,_., ikl-
102012
Equipment Blank2-
102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
mg/L
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
11/11
2.5
7.3
Hg/L
<10
<10
1
10
11/11
23
115
mg/L
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.05
11/11
1.81
60.8
<5
<5
0.3
5
10/11
10
420
^lU^T^^^I
<0.5
<0.5
0.05
0.5
11/11
2.1
16.9
0.022
0.016
0.01
0.25
11/11
135
480
JIWJ
0.43
0.26
0.10
0.20
11/11
0.18
171
mg/L
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.05
5/11
0.05
0.32
Hg/L
<0.20
<0.20
0.05
0.20
2/11
0.05
0.14
mg/L
NA
NA
Hg/L
<0.20
<0.20
0.10
0.20
1/11
0.11
0.11
BU^m9
<2
<2
0.6
2
5/11
0.6
2.3
^^^u9
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.1
11/11
4.0
11
NA. Not analyzed for.
R. Data rejected potential spectral interferences.
-------
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
A-27
Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L
July 2011
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank (1)
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
18/18
121
5100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<7
<7
<7
<7
<7
2
7
1/18
2
2
<17
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
2/18
6
152
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
15
50
16/18
17
104
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
3
10
2/18
3
4
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
15
50
7/18
17
64
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
18/18
120
3710
NA
NA
NA
NA
<7
<7
<7
<7
2
7
0/18
<7
<7
<17
<17
<17
<17
5
17
0/18
<17
<17
<50
<50
<50
<50
15
50
10/18
17
27
<10
<10
<10
<10
3
10
0/18
<10
<10
<50
<50
<50
<50
15
50
3/18
71
116
October 2012
Field Blankl- 102012
Field Blank2-102012
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<2.0
<2.0
<0.20
<0.20
<5
<5
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<5
<5
-------
Table A4 Dissolved Metal Blanks
A-28
g/L u,g/L u,g/L
Equipment Blankl-
102012
Equipment Blank2-
102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<2.0
0.20
0.2
2.0
11/11
117
1380
<0.20
<0.20
0.05
0.20
0/11
<0.20
<0.20
<5
<5
1
5
0/11
<5
<5
<0.20
<0.20
0.05
0.20
0/11
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.15
0.20
9/11
1.4
5.0
<0.20
<0.20
0.02
0.2
11/11
0.04
0.28
3
3
1
5
5/11
1
2
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
A-29
Table AS Total Metal Blanks
Sample ID
Date
Collected
m^w^m
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<16
<16
<16
4
16
1/18
18
18
<548
<548
<548
164
548
4/18
189
9010
<22
<22
<22
7
22
0/18
<22
<22
<370
<370
<370
111
370
17/18
141
469
<4
<4
<4
1
4
17/18
20
173
<11
<11
<11
3
11
0/18
<11
<11
0.37
0.15
<0.32
0.10
0.32
17/18
4
580
<4
<4
<4
1
4
0/18
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
1/18
2
2
<8
<8
<8
2
8
1/18
11
11
<22
10
<22
7
22
7/18
8
16
<74
<74
<74
22
74
18/18
37
23400
NA
NA
NA
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
9
<16
7
<16
4
16
1/18
19
19
<548
<548
<548
<548
164
548
2/18
217
316
<22
<22
<22
<22
7
22
0/18
<22
<22
<370
<370
<370
<370
111
370
17/18
171
474
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
17/18
19
263
<11
<11
<11
<11
3
11
0/18
<11
<11
0.11
<0.32
0.10
<0.32
0.10
0.32
17/18
3.59
384
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
0/18
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
1/18
4
4
<8
<8
<8
<8
2
8
0/18
<8
<8
<22
<22
<22
<22
7
22
6/18
7
21
<74
<74
<74
<74
22
74
14/18
41
16200
NA
NA
NA
NA
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<10
<10
2
10
0/11
<10
<10
<20
<20
3
20
3/11
25
243
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
0.2
11/11
0.3
3.7
<20
<20
3
20
11/11
144
475
0.3
<3
0.2
3
11/11
17
97
<3
<3
0.1
3
0/11
<3
<3
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
11/11
3.27
163
<0.20
<0.20
0.20
0.20
0/11
<0.20
<0.20
<5
1
1
3
6/11
1
8
<2.0
<2.0
0.3
2.0
1/11
2.6
2.6
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
10/11
0.54
1.6
<50
<50
20
50
7/11
38
6850
0.07
<0.2
0.01
0.2
2/11
0.01
0.12
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
Table AS Total Metal Blanks
A-30
Units mg/L ug/L mg/L ug/L
u,g/L mg/L ug/L mg/L ug/L
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<0.39
<0.39
<0.39
0.12
0.39
17/18
3
15
NA
NA
NA
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
0.03
0.11
17/18
2
276
<16
<16
<16
4
16
16/18
13
1450
<19
<19
<19
6
19
4/18
20
23
<1.90
<1.90
<1.90
0.57
1.90
17/18
110
1060
<93
<93
<93
28
93
1/18
199
199
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
0.02
0.07
8/18
.04
0.32
<19
<19
<19
6
19
0/18
<19
<19
<0.51
<0.51
<0.51
0.15
0.51
17/18
25
173
R
R
R
12
13
<33
10
33
0/18
<33
<33
<0.48
<0.48
<0.48
0.14
0.48
17/18
4.29
34
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.39
<0.39
<0.39
<0.39
0.12
0.39
17/18
2.75
12
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
0.03
0.11
17/18
1.95
163
^ J.D
^ J.D
^ J.D
^ J.D
4
16
16/18
12
1130
<19
<19
<19
<19
6
19
14/18
7
21
<1.90
<1.90
<1.90
<1.90
0.57
1.90
17/18
153
627
<93
<93
<93
<93
28
93
2/18
46
206
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
0.02
0.07
8/18
0.02
0.31
<19
<19
<19
<19
6
19
0/18
<19
<19
<0.51
<0.51
<0.51
<0.51
0.15
0.51
17/18
24.5
187
NA
NA
R
R
<33
<33
<33
<33
10
33
3/18
12
19
<0.48
<0.48
<0.48
<0.48
0.14
0.48
17/18
4.05
14
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
MDL
QL
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.3
<5
<5
1
5
<0.03
<0.03
0.01
0.03
0.2
0.2
0.2
3
<0.5
<0.5
0.05
0.5
<0.13
<0.13
0.01
0.13
<0.20
<0.20
0.10
0.20
<0.03
<0.03
0.01
0.03
<0.20
<0.20
0.05
0.20
NA
NA
<0.20
<0.20
0.10
0.20
<2
<2
0.6
2
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
-------
A-31
Table AS Total Metal Blanks
g/L ng/L mg/L
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
2/11
2/11
3/11
11/11
2.6
22
1.76
0.2
2.2
138
0.36
0.01
0.21
0.12
0.8
3.8
Max
7.6
108
58.5
418
17.5
497
172
0.31
0.27
0.18
1.7
11
NA. Not analyzed for.
R. Data rejected due to spectral interferences.
-------
Table AS Total Metal Blanks
A-32
oTL, *
Hl^m^fl
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<4
<4
<4
1
4
17/18
124
5050
NA
NA
NA
<8
<8
<8
2
8
3/18
9
317
<19
<19
<19
6
19
4/18
9
172
<56
<56
<56
17
56
8/18
19
105
<11
4
<11
3
11
6/18
4
17
<56
<56
<56
17
56
6/18
20
93
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Equipment Blank
Equipment Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<4
<4
<4
<4
1
4
17/18
119
3640
NA
NA
NA
NA
<8
<8
<8
<8
2
8
4/18
6
7
<19
<19
<19
<19
6
19
0/18
<19
<19
<56
<56
<56
<56
17
56
3/18
18
25
<11
<11
<11
<11
3
11
0/18
<11
<11
<56
<56
<56
<56
17
56
3/18
33
36
October 2012
Field Blankl- 102012
Field Blank2-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<2
<2
0.2
2.0
11/11
122
1310
0.07
<0.20
0.05
0.20
1/11
0.12
0.12
<3
<3
1
3
4/11
1
7
0.10
<0.20
0.05
0.20
0/11
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.15
0.20
9/11
1.4
5.4
<0.20
<0.20
0.02
0.2
11/11
0.27
1.30
<3
<3
1
3
4/11
1
2
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
A-33
Table A6 VOC Blanks
Sample ID
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
7/18/2011
7/20/2011
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
12.4
100
0/18
<100
<100
<25.0
<25.0
<25.0
<25.0
<25.0
6.4
25
0/18
<25.0
<25.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.63
1.0
1/18
80.3
80.3
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
2.8
5.0
2/18
156
975
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.41
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.12
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.17
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.15
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.18
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
R
R
R
R
R
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
October 2011
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<100
<100
<100
<100
12.4
100
0/18
<25.0
<25.0
<25.0
<25.0
6.4
25.0
0/18
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.63
1.0
0/18
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
2.8
5.0
2/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.41
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.12
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.17
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.15
1.0
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.18
0.5
0/18
R
R
R
R
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/18
-------
A-34
Table A6 VOC Blanks
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
10/17/2012
<200
<25.0
<25.0
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
Field Blank2-102012
10/18/2012
<200
<25.0
<25.0
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
Trip Blank 1-102012
10/17/2012
<200
<25.0
<25.0
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
MDL
135
9.42
6.8
0.16
4.35
2.66
0.09
0.15
0.28
0.10
0.12
0.05
QL
200
25.0
25.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
Detects
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
2/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
Min
<200
<25
<25
<0.5
229
<0.5
<0.5
Max
<200
<25
<25
<0.5
287
<0.5
<0.5
R. Data rejected. 1,1,2-trichloroethane is subject to alkaline hydrolysis to 1,1-dichloroethene. This reaction could be supported by the sample preservative (trisodium
phosphate).
NA. Not analyzed for.
-------
A-35
Table A6 VOC Blanks
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
7/18/2011
7/20/2011
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.14
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.11
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.08
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.14
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
1/18
3.77
3.77
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.16
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.15
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
R
R
R
R
R
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.14
1.0
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.11
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.08
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.14
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
1/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.16
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.15
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
R
R
R
R
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
-------
A-36
Table A6 VOC Blanks
Httfl
Concentration min
Concentration max
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.20
0.20
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Uflfl
<0.5
<0.5
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
Trip Blank 1-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
10/17/2012
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.17
1.0
0/11
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.17
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.15
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.17
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.11
0.5
1/11
0.62
0.62
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.21
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.10
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
R
R
R
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.10
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
R. Data rejected. 1,1,2-trichloroethane is subject to alkaline hydrolysis to 1,1-dichloroethene. This reaction could be supported by the sample preservative (trisodium
phosphate).
-------
A-37
Table A6 VOC Blanks
Sample ID
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
7/18/2011
7/20/2011
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.07
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
0.17
2.0
0/18
<2.0
<2.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.13
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.07
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
0.17
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.08
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.13
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
-------
A-38
Table A6 VOC Blanks
Sample ID
j^^^^H
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
1.0
0/18
<1.0
<1.0
2.0
1/18
0.59
0.59
0.5
1/18
0.5
0.5
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
1/18
0.39
0.39
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
1/18
0.26
0.26
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
0/18
<0.5
<0.5
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
Trip Blank 1-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
10/17/2012
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.10
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.06
1.0
0/11
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
0.14
2.0
0/11
<2.0
<2.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.03
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.04
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.10
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.07
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.06
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.09
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.12
0.5
0/11
<0.5
<0.5
R. Data rejected. 1,1,2-trichloroethane is subject to alkaline hydrolysis to 1,1-dichloroethene. This reaction could be supported by the sample preservative (trisodium
phosphate).
-------
A-39
Table A 7 Low Molecular Weight Acid Blanks
S,mp,e,D
iff
V9Q1R9PI
Units
mg/L
Bate Acetate
3-6) (64-19-7)
mg/L mg/L
Propionate Butyrate
(79-09-4) (107-92-6)
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.01
0.10
3/18
0.11
0.36
R
R
R
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
0.06
0.09
0.01
0.10
2/18
0.20
0.45
0.19
1.38
0.01
0.10
15/18
0.12
0.46
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
0/18
<0.10
<0.10
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.10
0/11
<0.10
<0.10
R
R
<0.10
<0.10
0.01
0.10
0/11
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.10
0/11
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.02
0.10
0/11
<0.10
<0.10
R. Data rejected. Formate contamination of TSP preservative.
-------
A-40
Table A8 Dissolved Gas Blanks
S,mp,e,D
Date
Collected
Units
Methane Ethane Propane Butane
(74-82-8) (74-84-0) (74-98-6) (106-97-8)
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
7/18/11
7/20/11
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0015
0.0002
0.0015
0/18
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0029
<0.0029
<0.0029
<0.0029
<0.0029
0.0008
0.0029
0/18
<0.0029
<0.0029
<0.0041
<0.0041
<0.0041
<0.0041
<0.0041
0.0008
0.0041
0/18
<0.0041
<0.0041
<0.0054
<0.0054
<0.0054
<0.0054
<0.0054
0.0010
0.0054
0/18
<0.0054
<0.0054
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
Trip Blank
MDL
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
R
<0.0002
R
<0.0002
0.0002
0.0014
11/18
0.0004
0.0253
R
<0.0028
R
<0.0028
0.0007
0.0028
1/18
0.0044
0.0044
R
<0.0039
R
<0.0039
0.0008
0.0039
0/18
<0.0039
<0.0039
R
0.0013
R
<0.0049
0.0010
0.0049
0/18
<0.0049
<0.0049
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
Trip Blankl-102012
MDL
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
10/17/2012
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0015
0.0003
0.0015
0/11
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0030
<0.0030
<0.0030
0.0005
0.0030
0/11
<0.0030
<0.0030
<0.0042
<0.0042
<0.0042
0.0007
0.0042
0/11
<0.0042
<0.0042
<0.0052
<0.0052
<0.0052
0.0008
0.0052
0/11
<0.0052
<0.0052
R. Data Rejected. Dissolved gas field and trip blank on 10/1811 was unusable due to carryover in the gas chromatograph from
a standard analyzed prior to this field and trip blank.
-------
Table A9 Glvcol Blanks
A-41
Date Collected
July 2011
Field Blank
7/18/11
<25
<25
Field Blank
7/19/11
<25
<25
Field Blank
7/20/11
<25
<25
QL
25
25
10
Detections in samples
0/18
0/18
0/18
0/18
Concentration min
<5
<25
<25
Concentration max
<5
<25
<25
October 2011
Field Blank
10/18/2011
<5
<50
<25
Field Blank
10/19/2011
<5
<50
<25
QL
50
25
Detections in samples
0/15
0/15
0/15
Concentration min
<50
<25
Concentration max
<50
<25
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
10/17/2012
<25
Field Blank2-102012
10/18/2012
<25
QL
25
10
10
10
Detects
0/11
0/11
0/11
0/11
Min
<25
Max
<25
R. Data rejected due to low recoveries on spikes and CCVs.
-------
A-42
Table A10 sVOC Blanks
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
-------
A-43
Table A10 sVOC Blanks
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
-------
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
A-44
Sample ID
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
5.00
0/18
<5.00
<5.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
0.54
0.56
0.87
0.50
6/18
0.50
1.53
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<5.00
<5.00
5.00
0/18
<5.00
<5.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<2.00
<3.00
<3.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-45
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
QL
Detects
Min
Max
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
mm
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-46
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
<2.50
<2.50
2.50
0/18
<2.50
<2.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
OctoberZOll
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
NR
NR
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
<2.50
2.50
0/18
<2.50
<2.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
-------
A-47
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<5.00
<5.00
5.00
0/11
<5.00
<5.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-48
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
5.00
0/18
<5.00
<5.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<5.00
<5.00
5.00
0/18
<5.00
<5.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
-------
A-49
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
-------
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
A-50
Sample ID
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
5/18
1.44
10.7
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
15/18
1.08
3.78
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
4/18
1.34
2.31
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
-------
A-51
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
October2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<3.00
<3.00
3.00
0/11
<3.00
<3.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-52
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-53
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
Sample ID
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/11
<1.00
<1.00
<2.00
<2.00
2.00
0/11
<2.00
<2.00
-------
A-54
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
I I
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
0.50
0/18
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<1.00
1.00
0/18
<1.00
<1.00
-------
A-55
Table A10 SVOC Blanks
-------
Table All DRO/ GRO Blanks
A-56
Sample ID
Date Collected
GRO/TPH
July 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
7/18/11
7/19/11
7/20/11
32.5
27.9
26.7
20.0
1/18
77.9
77.9
48.7
26.7
<20.0
20.0
17/18
26.3
120
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
<20
<20
20.0
2/18
20.9
23.6
<20
<20
20.0
17/18
25.1
96.9
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
<20.0
<20.0
20.0
0/11
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
20.0
7/11
27.3
124
-------
A-57
Table A12 Ethoxylated Alcohols, Alkylphenols and Acrylamide Blanks
Hg/L ng/L ng/L ng/L ng/L ng/L
October 2011
Field Blank
Field Blank
Trip Blank
QL
Detections in samples
Concentration min
Concentration max
10/18/2011
10/19/2011
10/18/2011
NA
NA
<0.8
0.8
0/4
<0.8
<0.8
NA
NA
0.8
0.8
4/4
1.2
1.9
NA
NA
<0.3
0.3
0/4
<0.3
<0.3
NA
NA
0.4
0.3
3/4
0.4
0.8
NA
NA
<0.3
0.3
1/4
0.5
0.5
NA
NA
<1
1
0/4
<1
<1
NA
NA
<0.05
0.05
0/4
<0.05
<0.05
NA
NA
<0.01
0.01
0/4
<0.01
<0.01
October 2012
Field Blankl-102012
Field Blank2-102012
QL
Detects
Min
Max
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
1
0.02
0.02
NA. Not analyzed for.
R. Data rejected lab and analytical QA issues.
-------
A-58
Table A13 DOC, DIG, Ammonia, and Anion Duplicates
mg/L mg N/L mg N/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
July 2011
5xQL
2.50
5.0
0.50
0.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
NDGW11-072011
7/19/2011
2.98
110
<0.10
0.07
<1.00
0.84
83.9
0.45
NA
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/2011
3.23
109
<0.10
0.08
<1.00
0.93
83.8
0.47
NA
RPD (%)
8.1
0.9
NC
NC
NC
NC
0.1
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/2011
3.84
137
<0.10
0.23
1.21
3.56
236
0.54
NA
NDGW15-072011DUP
7/19/2011
3.75
136
NS
NS
1.03
3.16
230
0.60
NA
RPD (%)
2.4
0.7
NC
NC
NC
NC
2.6
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
5.00
5.00
0.50
0.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
2.28
95.2
0.20
<0.10
<1.00
3.85
76.7
0.37
NA
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
10/19/2011
2.37
95.7
0.20
<0.10
0.06
3.86
77.5
0.35
NA
RPD (%)
NC
0.52
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.04
NC
NC
NDGW16- 102011
10/19/2011
4.33
143
<0.10
0.26
<1.00
12.8
447
0.33
NA
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
10/19/2011
4.43
141
<0.10
0.21
<1.00
11.5
446
0.32
NA
RPD (%)
2.3
1.4
NC
NC
NC
10.7
0.2
NC
NC
October 2012
5xQL
2.50
5.00
0.50
0.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
50.0
NDGW09- 102012
10/18/2012
6.44
188
<0.10
0.21
<1.00
1.70
224
2.83
<10.0
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
10/18//2012
6.60
189
<0.10
0.21
<1.00
1.62
223
2.75
<10.0
RPD
2.5
0.5
NC
NC
NC
NC
0.4
2.9
NC
NA. Not analyzed for.
NS. Not sampled well went dry.
NC. Not calculated.
-------
A-59
Table A14 Dissolved Metal Duplicates
Sample ID
u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L |ig/L |ig/L mg/L u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
70
<14
<14
NC
<14
<14
NC
2470
<494
<494
NC
<494
<494
NC
100
<20
<20
NC
<20
<20
NC
1665
177
178
NC
338
346
NC
20
51
52
1.9
25
26
3.9
50
<10
<10
NC
<10
<10
NC
1
32.8
33.1
0.9
44.2
45.8
3.6
20
<4
<4
NC
<4
<4
NC
20
1
<4
NC
<4
<4
NC
35
<7
<7
NC
<7
<7
NC
100
7
<20
NC
<20
<20
NC
335
816
971
17.3
1890
1930
2.1
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
70
<14
<14
NC
<14
<14
NC
2470
<494
<494
NC
<494
<494
NC
100
<20
<20
NC
<20
<20
NC
1665
179
177
NC
340
341
NC
20
43
43
0.0
39
39
0.0
50
<10
<10
NC
<10
<10
NC
1.45
31.9
32.2
0.9
98.5
100
1.5
20
<4
<4
NC
<4
<4
NC
20
<4
<4
NC
<4
<4
NC
35
<7
<7
NC
<7
<7
NC
100
9
9
NC
<20
<20
NC
335
<67
<67
NC
5500
5520
0.4
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
50
<10
<10
NC
100
7
11
NC
1.0
<0.2
<0.2
NC
200
476
483
1.5
25
17
19
NC
25
<5
<5
NC
0.5
3.36
3.38
0.6
1.0
<0.20
<0.20
NC
25
<5
<5
NC
10.0
0.7
0.6
NC
2.5
0.3
0.7
NC
500
41
<100
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-60
Table A14 Dissolved Metal Duplicates
^E^QT
' ' 1
ug/L ug/L mg/L ug/L mg/L ug/L
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
2
3.56
3.55
0.3
5.65
5.84
3.3
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
1
11.4
11.4
0.0
19.8
20.3
2.5
70
77
78
1.3
338
344
1.8
85
31
19
NC
22
22
NC
9
178
180
1.1
263
273
3.7
420
<84
<84
NC
<84
<84
NC
0
0.05
0.07
NC
<0.06
<0.06
NC
85
<17
<17
NC
<17
<17
NC
2
27.2
27.7
1.8
72.2
73.5
1.8
0
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
1.75
2.79
2.81
0.7
7.18
7.18
0.0
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
0.5
11.8
11.9
0.8
41.1
41.2
0.2
70
95
94
1.1
927
932
0.5
85
5
6
NC
15
15
NC
8.55
151
152
0.7
261
264
1.1
420
<84
<84
NC
<84
<84
NC
0.3
<0.06
<0.06
NC
<0.06
<0.06
NC
85
<17
<17
NC
<17
<17
NC
2.3
25.4
25.2
0.8
147
146
0.7
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
1.0
<0.2
<0.2
NC
2.5
2.6
2.5
3.9
50
33
34
NC
0.25
1.81
1.83
1.1
25
10
11
NC
2.5
3.8
4.6
19.0
1.25
477
480
NC
1.00
0.18
0.22
NC
0.25
0.31
0.32
3.2
1.00
<0.20
<0.20
NC
NA
NA
NC
1.00
<0.20
<0.20
NC
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data Rejected.
-------
A-61
Table A14 Dissolved Metal Duplicates
C^d
EH 1 1
Hg/L
Hg/L
zn
Hg/L
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
150
<30
<30
NC
<30
<30
NC
2
10.4
10.6
1.9
13.0
13.1
0.8
20
259
261
0.8
610
633
3.7
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
35
2
<7
NC
<7
<7
NC
85
<17
<17
NC
<17
<17
NC
250
17
<50
NC
22
24
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
<10
<10
NC
250
34
37
NC
<50
<50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
150
15
14
NC
11
19
NC
2.15
7.54
7.52
0.3
13.6
13.6
0.0
20
282
283
0.4
1260
1280
1.6
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
35
<7
<7
NC
<7
<7
NC
85
<17
<17
NC
<17
<17
NC
250
17
<50
NC
17
19
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
<10
<10
NC
250
71
70
NC
<50
<50
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
10
<2
<2
NC
0.5
4.0
4.0
0.0
10.0
117
121
3.4
1.0
<0.20
<0.20
NC
25
<5
<5
NC
1.00
<0.20
<0.20
NC
1.00
<0.20
<0.20
NC
1.0
0.06
0.07
NC
25
<5
1
NC
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-62
Table A15 Total Metal Duplicates
Sample ID
ollected
u.g/L u.g/L u.g/L mg/L
July 2011
5xQL
80
2740
110
1850
20
55
20
20
40
110
370
NDGW11-072011
7/19/2011
<548
<22
167
52
32.4
<4
<4
<8
<22
1170
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/2011
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/2011
<548
<22
331
26
44.3
<4
<4
<8
<22
2550
NDGW15-072011 DUP
7/19/2011
<548
<22
331
26
44.4
<4
<4
<8
<22
2580
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
0.0
NC
0.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.2
October 2011
5xQL
80
2740
110
1850
20
55
1.6
20
20
40
110
370
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<548
<22
180
47
33.2
<4
<4
<8
21
71
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<548
<22
180
48
33.7
<4
<4
<8
20
69
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
2.1
NC
1.5
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW16-102011
10/19/2011
<548
<22
353
50
121
<4
<4
<8
<22
7650
NDGW16-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<548
<22
354
42
102
<4
<4
<8
<22
6350
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
17.4
NC
17.0
NC
NC
NC
NC
18.6
October 2012
5xQL
50
100
100
15
15
0.25
1.00
15
10.0
2.5
250
NDGW09-102012
10/18/2012
<20
0.3
475
18
<3
3.27
<0.20
<2.0
<0.5
45.2
NDGW09-102012 DUP
10/18//2012
<20
0.3
473
17
<3
3.31
<0.20
<2.0
0.54
38.1
RPD
NC
NC
NC
0.4
5.7
NC
1.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NS. Not sampled for.
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-63
Table A15 Total Metal Duplicates
^J
co^ed
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
D
2
3.61
NS
NC
5.70
5.71
0.2
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
July 2011
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
1
11.3
NS
NC
19.9
19.8
0.5
80
76
NS
NC
340
340
0.0
95
<19
NS
NC
20
20
NC
10
178
NS
NC
265
265
0.0
465
<93
NS
NC
<93
<93
NC
0
0.11
NS
NC
0.04
0.04
0.0
95
<19
NS
NC
<19
<19
NC
mg/L
ug/L
3
25.2
NS
NC
70.6
70.1
0.7
0
R
NS
NC
R
R
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
1.95
2.99
2.93
2.0
7.84
7.39
5.9
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
0.55
12.3
12.1
1.6
49.5
41.7
17.1
80
231
304
27.3
1130
956
16.7
95
8
<19
NC
14
15
NC
9.5
154
156
1.3
268
269
0.4
465
<93
<93
NC
<93
<93
NC
0.35
<0.07
<0.07
NC
0.03
0.03
NC
95
<19
<19
NC
<19
<19
NC
2.55
24.5
24.3
0.8
159
141
12.0
0
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
1.0
<0.2
<0.2
NC
1.5
2.6
2.6
0.0
25
24
24
NC
0.15
1.76
1.78
1.1
15
11
11
NC
2.5
6.5
6.5
0.0
0.65
497
496
0.2
1.00
0.42
0.36
NC
0.15
0.30
0.31
3.3
1
<0.20
<0.20
NC
NA
NA
NC
1
<0.20
<0.20
NC
NS. Not sampled for.
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data rejected.
-------
A-64
Table A15 Total Metal Duplicates
ug/L ug/L ug/L
July 2011
5xQL
165
20
40
95
280
55
280
NDGW11-072011
7/19/2011
<33
9.97
255
NA
<8
<56
93
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/2011
NS
NS
NS
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/2011
<33
12.9
610
NA
<8
19
<56
NDGW15-072011 DUP
7/19/2011
<33
12.8
611
NA
<8
18
<56
RPD (%)
NC
0.8
0.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
165
2.4
20
40
95
280
55
280
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<33
7.24
280
NA
<8
<56
36
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<33
7.26
280
NA
<8
<56
37
RPD (%)
NC
0.3
0.0
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW16- 102011
10/19/2011
<33
13.8
1450
NA
<8
<56
<56
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<33
13.7
1240
NA
<8
<56
<56
RPD (%)
NC
0.7
15.6
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2012
5xQL
10
0.25
10.0
1.00
15
1.00
1.00
1.0
15
NDGW09- 102012
10/18/2012
<2
3.8
122
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.39
<3
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
10/18//2012
<2
3.8
123
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
0.39
<3
RPD
NC
0.0
0.8
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NS. Not sampled for.
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
A-65
JulyZOll
5xQL
500
125
0
25
2.5
NDGW11-072011
7/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
NDGW15-072011DUP
7/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
500
125
0
25
2.5
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
5xQL
500
125
25
2.5
NDGW16-102011
10/19/2011
<100
<25.0
NA
NA
<5.0
<0.5
NDGW16-102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
<100
NC
<25.0
NC
NA
NC
NA
NC
NC
<5.0
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
<0.5
NC
NC
-------
A-66
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
October 2012
5xQL
1000
125
125
2.5
25
2.5
NDGW09-102012
10/18/2012
<200
<25.0
<25.0
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
NDGW09-102012 DUP
10/18//2012
<200
<25.0
<25.0
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
RPD
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data rejected.
-------
A-67
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
<1.0
<1.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
-------
A-68
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-69
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
0
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
<1.0
<1.0
NC
10
<2.0
<2.0
NC
<2.0
<2.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
<0.5
<0.5
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
0
R
R
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
10
<2.0
<2.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
0
R
R
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
10
<2.0
<2.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
-------
A-70
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
2.5
R
R
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
5
<1.0
<1.0
NC
10
<2.0
<2.0
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
2.5
<0.5
<0.5
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data rejected.
-------
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
A-71
July 2011
5xQL
2.5
2.5
NDGW11-072011
7/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
NDGW15-072011DUP
7/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.5
2.5
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.5
2.5
NDGW16-102011
10/19/2011
<0.5
<0.5
NDGW16-102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
<0.5
NC
<0.5
NC
-------
A-72
Table A16 Volatile Organic Compound Duplicates
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-73
Table A17 Low Molecular Weight Acid Duplicates
Sample ID
Date Collected
(50-21-5) (64-18-6) (64-19-7) (79-09-4) (107-92-6)
Ityfl lu^H
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
7/19/2011
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
0.11
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
0.14
0.17
NC
0.20
0.30
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
<0.10
<0.10
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
R
R
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
0.50
<0.10
<0.10
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data rejected.
-------
A-74
Table A18 Dissolved Gas Duplicates
Date Collected
Methane (74-82-8) Ethane (74-84-0) Propane (74-98-6) Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
0.0075
<0.0015
<0.0015
NC
<0.0015
<0.0015
NC
0.0145
<0.0029
<0.0029
NC
<0.0029
<0.0029
NC
0.0205
<0.0041
<0.0041
NC
<0.0041
<0.0041
NC
0.0270
<0.0054
<0.0054
NC
<0.0054
<0.0054
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
0.0070
0.0004
<0.0014
NC
0.0041
0.0050
NC
0.0140
<0.0028
<0.0028
NC
<0.0028
<0.0028
NC
0.0195
<0.0039
<0.0039
NC
<0.0039
<0.0039
NC
0.0245
<0.0049
<0.0049
NC
<0.0049
<0.0049
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
0.0075
<0.0015
<0.0015
NC
0.0150
<0.0030
<0.0030
NC
0.0210
<0.0042
<0.0042
NC
0.0260
<0.0052
<0.0052
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-75
Table A19 Glycol Duplicates
Sample ID
1 ' ' ' > '
HifflB W9^i W9^i m^i m^i
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
25
<5
<5
NC
<5
<5
NC
125
<25
<25
NC
<25
<25
NC
125
<25
<25
NC
<25
<25
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
<10
<10
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
25
<5
<5
NC
<5
<5
NC
250
<50
<50
NC
<50
<50
NC
125
<25
<25
NC
<25
<25
NC
R
R
NC
R
R
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
125
<25
<25
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
50
<10
<10
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
A-76
Sample ID
July 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50 2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
NDGW11-072011
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NDGW11-072011 DUP
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NDGW15-072011 DUP
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
NDGW16-102011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NDGW16-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
-------
A-77
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Sample ID
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
maim
NC
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-78
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
<5.00
<5.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
-------
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
A-79
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
15.00
<15.0
<15.0
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
10.00
<10.0
<10.0
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
A-80
July 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
2.50
12.50
NDGW11-072011
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
NDGW11-072011DUP
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW15-072011
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
NDGW15-072011 DUP
7/19/11
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
0.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
2.50
12.50
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NR
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NR
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.00
<0.50
<0.50
<2.50
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
0.00
2.50
2.50 2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
2.50 12.50
-------
A-81
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-82
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
<5.00
<5.00
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
25.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
-------
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
A-83
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
5.00
<5.00
<5.00
NC
15.00
<15.0
<15.0
NC
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-84
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Sample ID
Collected | | |- | =; 2. -=
H
H
H
H H H
||
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
5.00
<1.00
2.08
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
1.12
<1.00
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
5.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
-------
A-85
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-86
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
fl
Kfl
J
J
J ?
El
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
KB
H
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW16- 102011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
5.00
<1.00
2.50
<0.50
5.00
<1.00
2.50
<0.50
2.50
<0.50
-------
A-87
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-88
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
1 ^B^l ^E^l ^R^l ^E^l
H
11
EH B^l H^9 EH
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
<1.00
<1.00
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
2.50
<0.50
<0.50
NC
5.00
<1.00
<1.00
NC
October 2011
5xQL
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
2.50
5.00
-------
A-89
Table A20 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-90
Table A21 Diesel Range Organic Compounds and Gasoline Range
Organic Compounds Duplicates
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW11-072011
NDGW11-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW15-072011
NDGW15-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
100
<20.0
<20.0
NC
<20.0
<20.0
NC
100
55.4
52.4
NC
40.1
49.3
NC
October 2011
5xQL
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
100
<20
<20
NC
<20
<20
NC
100
25.7
26.3
NC
40.1
47.1
NC
October 2012
5xQL
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
100
<20.0
<20.0
NC
100.0
124
118
5.0
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-91
Table A22 O and H Stable Isotopes of Water Duplicates
jmg
July 2011
NDGW10-072011
NDGW10-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW13-072011
NDGW13-072011 DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
October 2011
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW16- 102011
NDGW16- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
-127.20
-126.89
0.2
-114.64
-114.69
0.0
-15.93
-15.98
0.3
-14.35
-14.39
0.3
October 2012
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
-129.21
-129.09
0.1
-16.52
-16.38
0.9
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
-------
A-92
Table A23 Strontium Isotope Duplicates
July 2011
NDGW10-072011
NDGW10-072011DUP
RPD (%)
NDGW13-072011
NDGW13-072011DUP
RPD (%)
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
7/19/11
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
NA
NA
NC
October 2011
NDGW12-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
RPD (%)
10/19/2011
10/19/2011
287
293
2.1
0.708610
0.708618
0.0
0.00348
0.00341
2.0
0.0009
0.0009
2.1
October 2012
NDGW09- 102012
NDGW09- 102012 DUP
RPD
10/18/2012
10/18//2012
112
117
4.4
0.707534
0.707561
0.0
0.0089286
0.008547
4.4
0.023214
0.022222
4.4
-------
A-93
Table A24 Ethoxvlated Alcohols, Alkvlphenols and Acrvlamide Duplicates
July 2011
5xQL
NDGW10-072011
7/19/11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NDGW10-072011DUP
7/19/11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW13-072011
7/19/11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NDGW13-072011 DUP
7/19/11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2011
5xQL
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.25
0.05
NDGW12-102011
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NDGW12-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NDGW16-102011
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NDGW16-102011 DUP
10/19/2011
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RPD (%)
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
October 2012
5xQL
0.05
NDGW09-102012
10/18/2012
<0.01
NDGW09-102012 DUP
10/18//2012
<0.01
RPD
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NA. Not analyzed for.
NC. Not Calculated.
R. Data Rejected.
-------
A-94
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab Summary of QA/QC Results Impact on Data/Usability
July 2011
Field Parameters/EPA on-
site
Dissolved gases/ Shaw
Environmental
DOC/ORD/NRMRL-Ada
DIC/ORD/NRMRL-Ada
Anions/ Ammonia
ORD/NRMRL-Ada
Dissolved Metals/ Shaw
Environmental
Total Metals/ Shaw
Environmental
Results for ferrous iron and sulfide are
considered screening values as they
were measured on site with field kits.
Mid-day performance checks were not
done.
All QA/QC criteria were met.
All QA/QC criteria were met.
All QA/QC criteria were met.
All QA/QC criteria were met.
ICP-MS: All ICP-MS results were
rejected and replaces with ICP-OES
results. The reasons stated were
potential interferences and that
interference check standards were not
run.
ICP-OES:
Antimony: The ICP-OES data for Sb
was rejected because of potential
spectral interferences.
Continuing calibration checks were
analyzed at appropriate intervals,
however, some metals (B, Ba, K, Na,
Ag, Si, S, P, and U) were not always
included in the check standards at the
required intervals.
Uranium: High U results (>30 ng/L)
may be due to spectral interference
and/or high quantitation limits using
ICP-OES.
ICP-MS: All ICP-MS results were
rejected and replaced with ICP-OES
results. The reasons stated were
potential interferences and that
All detected results for ferrous iron and
sulfide were qualified "J" as estimated.
Data usability is unaffected.
Beginning and end-of day performance
checks were done and were within control
limits. Data usability is unaffected.
Meets project requirements.
Meets project requirements.
Meets project requirements.
Meets project requirements.
ICP-MS: The ICP-MS data was replaced
with ICP-OES data. Detection and
quantitation limits are higher than
desirable. The ICP-OES data cannot be
compared with the subsequent ICP-MS data
for trace metals from the third sampling
event.
ICP-OES
Antimony: The data was rejected and
flagged with an R.
All samples with detected quantities for
these metals were qualified "J" as
estimated. Data for B, Ba, K, Na, Ag, Si, S, P,
and U are usable as positive identifications
with estimated concentrations.
Uranium: Affected samples are NDGW04,
NDGW07, NDGW08, and NDGW10. No
primary MCL exceedances (>30 (ig/L) were
observed in the October 2011 sampling
event. Third sampling event used ICP-MS.
ICP-MS: The ICP-MS data was replaced
with ICP-OES data. Detection and
quantitation limits are higher than
desirable. The ICP-OES data cannot be
-------
A-95
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
interference check standards were not
run.
Digestion: It was determined that all
parameters were not adhered to in US
EPA Method 3015A.
ICP-OES:
Continuing calibration checks were
analyzed at appropriate intervals,
however, some metals (B, Ba, K, Na,
Ag, Si, S, P, and U) were not always
included in the check standards at the
required intervals.
Antimony: The ICP-OES data for Sb
was rejected because of potential
spectral interferences.
Uranium: High U results (>30
may be due to spectral interference
and/or high quantitation limits using
ICP-OES.
Digestion Blank:
The digestion blank for Ca was
reported 0.33 mg/L The field blanks
on 7/18/2011 had detectable
concentrations of Ca at 0.37 mg/L The
samples were >10x the concentration
reported in the digestion blank.
Impact on Data/Usability
compared with the subsequent ICP-MS data
for trace metals from the third sampling
event.
Digestion: The "J" qualifier was applied to
detections above the QL for digested
samples. Data are usable as positive
identifications with estimated
concentrations.
ICP-OES
All samples with detected quantities for
these metals were qualified "J" as
estimated.
Data for B, Ba, K, Na, Ag, Si, S, P, and U are
usable as positive identifications with
estimated concentrations.
Antimony: The data was rejected and
flagged with an R.
Uranium: Affected samples are NDGW04,
NDGW07, and NDGW08. No primary MCL
exceedances (>30 (ig/L) were observed in
the October 2011 sampling event. Future
sampling events will use ICP-MS.
Digestion Blank: There was no impact on
data quality for Ca since all samples were
>10x that reported in the digestion Blank.
The field blank collected on 7/18/11 was
qualified with a B. Data is usable with
caution since it is greater in concentration
than the digestion blank.
Charge Balance
The calculated charge balance ranged
from 0.1 to 3.9% based on major
anions (bicarbonate, chloride, and
sulfate) and major cations (dissolved
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and
sodium).
Meets project requirements.
Measured SPC Versus
Calculated SPC
The measured SPC versus calculated
SPC ranged from 1.1 to 12.0%.
Meets project requirements.
VOC/Shaw
Environmental
The matrix spike results for 1,1-
dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trichloroethane were significantly
outside of the control limits. These
compounds are known to be affected
All data for 1,1-dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trochloroethene were qualified with an "R"
and rejected as unusable.
-------
A-96
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
by base hydrolysis. The preservative,
trisodium phosphate (TSP), is a base
and elevated temperatures (heated
headspace sample introduction) will
accelerate the hydrolysis of 1,1,2-
trichloroethane to 1,1-dichloroethene.
Acetone, toluene, vinyl chloride,
carbon disulfide, tetrachloroethene,
and chlorobenzene had low matrix
spike recoveries on 7/28/11.
Impact on Data/Usability
This affected the following samples:
NDGW10-072011, NDGW11-072011,
NDGW11-072011 DUP, NDGW12-072011,
NDGW13-072011, NDGW15-072011,
NDGW16-072011, and the field blank
collected on 7/19/2011. The samples were
qualified with a "J-". indicating that the
samples may be biased low.
Low Molecular Weight
Acids/Shaw
Environmental
All field blanks for acetate were
greater than the QL It was later
determined that the TSP preservative
was the source of the acetate
contamination.
For acetate, the data were qualified with
"R" and rejected as unusable.
The method for glycols was under
development.
Glycols/ Region 3
Laboratory
The QAPP stated that these data are to be
considered screening values until the
method was validated. Even though the
data are considered to be for screening
level evaluation, they are usable as on-
going QC checks provide confidence that
the method can detect glycols.
sVOC/ Region 8
Laboratory
2-butoxyethanol was detected in
method blanks at 0.67 and 0.77
affecting the following samples
NDGW04-072011, NDGW05-072011,
NDGW06-072011, NDGW08-072011,
field blank on7/18/2011, NDGW12-
072011, NDGW13-072011, the field
blank on 7/19/2011, and the field
blankon7/20/2011for2-
butoxyethanol.
The blank spike had a high recovery
for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate affecting
the following samples NDGW06-
072011 and NDGW16-072011 for
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.
The affected samples >QL for 2-
butoxyethanol were qualified with a "B."
Data is usable with caution for samples
greater than the method blanks (NDGW05,
NDGW06, NDGW12, and NDGW13). The
remaining affected samples (NDGW04,
NDGW08, and field blanks) are less than
method blanks and unusable, but indicative
that samples are low in concentration.
The two identified samples were >QL for
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and that data
was qualified with a "J+" to indicate the
potential high bias; data is usable taking
this into account.
DRO/GRO/ Region 8
Laboratory
DRO: The MSD recovery was low for
sample NDGW11-072011
Field blank samples collected on
DRO: Sample NDGW11 was qualified with a
"J-" to indicate that the sample was
possibly biased low, data usability takes this
into account.
Samples collected on 7/18/2011 and
-------
A-97
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
7/18/2011 and 7/19/2011 both had
reported concentrations >QL at 48.7
and 26.7 (ig/L, respectively.
GRO: All three field blanks have
detections above QL at 32.5, 27.8, and
26.7
Impact on Data/Usability
7/19/2011 that were >QL, but <10x QL
were qualified with a B to indicate possible
contamination. Samples with
concentrations less than their associated
blank: NDGW01, NDGW03, NDGW04,
NDGW05, and NDGW06 ;data are unusable
but indicative that samples are low in
concentration. NDGW07,NDGW08,
NDGW09, NDGW10, NDGW11,
NDGWlldup, NDGW12, NDGW13,
NDGW15, NDGWISdup, and NDGW16 are
greater than blank value and are usable
with caution. NDGW02 and NDGW14 have
no impacts from blanks and are usable.
GRO: One sample, NDGW10 is affected and
qualified with a "B". It is more than 2x the
associated blank value and is usable with
caution.
O, H Stable Isotopes of
Water/ Shaw
Environmental
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
Sr Isotopes/ USGS
Laboratory- Denver
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
Ethoxylated Alcohols,
Alkylphenols, and
Acrylamide/ORD/NERL-
Las Vegas
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
Not analyzed in this sampling event.
October 2011
Field Parameters/EPA on-
site
Results for ferrous iron and sulfide are
considered screening values as they
were measured on site with field kits.
Mid-day performance checks were not
done. End-of-day check was not done
on 10/19/2011.
All detected results for ferrous iron and
sulfide were qualified "J" as estimated.
Data usability is unaffected.
Beginning and end-of day performance
checks were done on 10/18/2011 and were
within control limits. Data usability is
unaffected. The end-of-day check on
10/19/2011 was not done to the accidental
spill of the YSI Confidence Solution. The
measurements for pH, ORP, and specific
conductance were not qualified but are
considered usable as estimates.
Dissolved gases/ Shaw
Environmental
All target analytes were detected in a
dissolved gases trip blank collected on
10/18/11 and in a field blank collected
10/18/11.
It was determined that these blanks were
affected by standard carryover from the
syringe used to inject samples and
standards. The blanks were qualified with
an "R" and rejected as unusable.Samples
collected on 10/18/2011 with reported
-------
A-98
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
Impact on Data/Usability
concentrations >QL (NDGW07, NDGW08,
NDGW09 and NDGW14 for methane and
NDGW08 for ethane) were qualified with a
"B" to indicate that there is a potential
impact on data quality and data is suspect
but usable as estimated.
DOC/ORD/NRMRL-Ada
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements
DIC/ORD/NRMRL-Ada
The matrix spikes had low recovery,
ranging from 60-80%. The matrix
spikes were prepared and analyzed
twice with similar results. A
laboratory control spike was prepared
and analyzed. The laboratory control
spike produced 97.3% recovery. These
results indicate possible matrix
interference.
The likely reason for the matrix spike failure
is that the addition of the matrix spike
caused the sample to become saturated
with respect to a carbonate mineral phase,
such as calcite. This caused the carbonate
to precipitate and therefore caused the low
spike recovery observed. All results were
qualified with a "J-" to indicate a potential
negative bias taken into account for data
usability.
Anions/Ammonia
ORD/NRMRL-Ada
Bromide (FIA): Sample NDGW07 was
re-analyzed past its holding time by
about 12 days.
Chloride: All QA/QC criteria were met.
Sulfate: All QA/QC criteria were met.
Fluoride: All QA/QC criteria were met.
Nitrate + Nitrite: All QA/QC criteria
were met.
Ammonia: All QA/QC criteria were
met.
Bromide (FIA): The sample NDGW07-
102011 was qualified with an "H" and is
considered to have a potential negative
bias that is taken into account for data
usability.
Chloride: Meets project requirements.
Sulfate: Meets project requirements.
Fluoride: Meets project requirements.
Nitrate + Nitrite: Meets project
requirements.
Ammonia: Meets project requirements.
Dissolved Metals/Shaw
Environmental
ICP-MS: All ICP-MS results were
rejected and replaces with ICP-OES
results. The reasons stated were
potential interferences and that
interference check standards were not
run.
ICP-OES:
Antimony: The data was affected by a
potential spectral interference using
the ICP-OES.
Continuing calibration checks were
analyzed at appropriate intervals,
ICP-MS: The ICP-MS data was replaced
with ICP-OES data. Detection and
quantitation limits are higher than
desirable. The ICP-OES data cannot be
compared with the subsequent ICP-MS data
for trace metals from the third sampling
event.
ICP-OES:
Antimony: The data was rejected and
flagged with an "R".
All samples with detected quantities for
these metals were qualified "J" as
-------
A-99
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
however, some metals (B, Ba, K, Na,
Ag, Si, S, P, and U) were not always
included in the check standards at the
required intervals.
Impact on Data/Usability
estimated. Data for B, Ba, K, Na, Ag, Si, S, P,
and U are usable as positive identifications
with estimated concentrations.
Total Metals/Shaw
Environmental
ICP-MS: All ICP-MS results were
rejected and replaced with ICP-OES
results. The reasons stated were
potential interferences and that
interference check standards were not
run.
Digestion: It was determined that all
parameters were not adhered to in US
EPA Method 3015A
ICP-OES:
Antimony: The ICP-OES data for Sb
was rejected because of potential
spectral interferences.
Continuing calibration checks were
being analyzed at appropriate
intervals, however, some metals (B, Ba,
K, Na, Ag, Si, S, P, and U) were not
always included in the check standards
at the required intervals.
ICP-MS: The ICP-MS data was replaced
with ICP-OES data. Detection and
quantitation limits are higher than
desirable. The ICP-OES data cannot be
compared with the subsequent ICP-MS data
for trace metals from the third sampling
event.
Digestion: The "J" qualifier was applied to
detections above the QL for digested
samples. Data are usable as positive
identifications with estimated
concentrations.
ICP-OES:
Antimony: The data was rejected and
flagged with an "R".
All samples with detected quantities for
these metals were qualified "J" as
estimated. Data for B, Ba, K, Na, Ag, Si, S, P,
and U are usable as positive identifications
with estimated concentrations.
Charge Balance
The calculated charge balance ranged
from 0.2to 5.2% based on major anions
(bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate)
and major cations (dissolved calcium,
magnesium, potassium, and sodium).
Meets project requirements.
NDGW05-102011 had a charge balance of
5.2% which is slightly greater than the 5%
restriction for inclusion in geochemical
modeling. However, this will only have a
minor effect and can be used with caution.
Measured SPC Versus
Calculated SPC
The measured SPC versus calculate SPC
ranged from 0.3 to 14.6%.
Meet project requirements.
VOC/Shaw
Environmental
The matrix spike results for 1,1-
dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trichloroethane were significantly
outside of the control limits. These
compounds are known to be affected
by base hydrolysis. The preservative,
trisodium phosphate (TSP), is a base
and elevated temperatures (heated
headspace sample introduction) will
accelerate the hydrolysis of 1,1,2-
trichloroethane to 1,1-dichloroethene.
All data for 1,1-dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trichloroethene were qualified with an "R"
and rejected as unusable.
-------
A-100
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
Carbon disulfide had low recoveries for
both the matrix spike (MS) & matrix
spike duplicate (MSD). A laboratory
control spike (LCS) was analyzed with
all compound recoveries in acceptance
limits.
Impact on Data/Usability
All sample results were QL were qualified with a
"B". All samples collected on 10/19/11 are
less than the field blank and are unusable
(NDGW10, NDGW11, NDGW12,
NDGW12dup, NDGW13, NDGW15,
NDGW16, and NDGWlSdup). Samples
collected on 10/18/11 that are less than the
field blank are NDGW04, NDGW06,
NDGW08, and NDGW09 and their data is
unusable. NDGW01, NDGW03, and
NDGW14 are greater than the blank and
are usable with caution.
The method for glycols was under
development.
Glycols/ Region 3
Laboratory
The recovery for the LCS/blank spike
BJ12502-BS1 for tetraethylene glycol
was 71%, below the 80-120% limits.
Also, the continuing calibration
verification (CCV) Ultra glycol 50 ppb
1100495 standard was below the 80-
120% recovery range for tetraethylene
glycol at 56%.
The QAPP stated that these data are to be
considered screening values until the
method was validated. Even though the
data are considered to be for screening
level evaluation, they are usable as on-
going QC checks provide confidence that
the method can detect glycols.
For tetraethylene glycol the data was
rejected and qualified with "R".
sVOC/ Region 8
Laboratory
Low spike recovery (57.8%) in blank
spike for (R)-(+)-limonene affecting all
samples.
A method blank sample had bis-(2-
ethylhexyl)adipate >QL at 1.41 ng/L
affecting the following samples:
NDGW03-102011, NDGW04-102011,
NDGW05-102011, NDGW06-102011,
NDGW07-102011, NDGW08-102011,
NDGW09-102011, and NDGW14-
102011.
All samples are qualified with a "J-" for
potential negative bias taken into account
for data usability.
Affected samples with reported values
>QL were qualified using a B qualifier for
bis-(2-ethylhexyl)adipate. Sample data is
suspect and should be used with caution.
-------
A-101
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
Low matrix spike recovery for
limonene (50%), 1,3-
dimethylandamantane (59.4%),
adamantane (58%), diphenylamine
(54%), squalene (50.2%), and 4-
chloroaniline (10.6%).
Impact on Data/Usability
All reported values for 1,3-
dimethylandamantane, adamantante,
diphenylamine, and squalene and 4-
chloroaniline are qualified with a "J-" for
potential negative bias taken into account
for data usability.
DRO/GRO/ Region 8
Laboratory
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements.
O, H Stable Isotopes of
Water/ Shaw
Environmental
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements.
No problems noted.
Sr Isotopes/ USGS
Laboratory- Denver
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements.
Ethoxylated Alcohols,
Alkylphenols, and
Acrylamide/ORD/NERL-
Las Vegas
The nonylphenol ethoxylate and
ethoxylated alcohol (C13EO4.10) had
concentration >QL in the trip blank.
This affected samples NDGW04-
102011, NDGW07-102011, NDGW08-
102011, and NDGW09-102011.
Affected samples were qualified with a "B"
qualifier. Samples
-------
A-102
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
NDGW03-102012, NDGW04-102012,
NDGW05-102012, NDGW06-102012,
NDGW09-102012, NDGW09-
102012dup, and NDGW14-1012 should
be qualified with a "B".
ICP-OES: All QA/QC criteria were met.
Hg by CVAA: All QA/QC criteria were
met.
Impact on Data/Usability
are ~5x blank and are usable with caution.
NDGW04-102012 is ~10x blank and is
usable. NDGW01-102012 and NDGW06-
102012 are ~10x blank and are usable.
NDGW14-102012 is ~7x blank and is usable
with caution. NDGW09-102012dup is less
than the blank and unusable.
ICP-OES: Meets project requirements.
Hg by CVAA: Meets project requirements.
Total Metals/Southwest
Research Institute
ICP-MS: All QA/QC criteria were met.
ICP-OES: All QA/QC criteria were met.
Hg by CVAA: All QA/QC criteria were
met.
ICP-MS: Meets project requirements.
ICP-OES: Meets project requirements.
Hg by CVAA: Meets project requirements.
Charge Balance
The calculated charge balance ranged
from 0.3 to 3.8% based on major
anions (bicarbonate, chloride, and
sulfate) and major cations (dissolved
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and
sodium).
Meets project requirements.
Measured SPC Versus
Calculated SPC
The measured SPC versus calculate SPC
ranged from 0.9 to 10.0%.
Meet project requirements.
VOC/Shaw
Environmental
The matrix spike results for 1,1-
dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trichloroethane were significantly
outside of the control limits. These
compounds are known to be affected
by base hydrolysis. The preservative,
trisodium phosphate (TSP), is a base
and elevated temperatures (heated
headspace sample introduction) will
accelerate the hydrolysis of 1,1,2-
trichloroethane to 1,1-dichloroethene.
Acrylonitrile, ethanol and acetone had
a low matrix spike recovery.
All data for 1,1-dichloroethene and 1,1,2-
trichloroethene were qualified with an "R"
and rejected as unusable.
The "J-" qualifier was added to all samples
for acrylonitrile, ethanol, and acetone for
potential negative bias taken into account
for data usability.
Low Molecular Weight
Acids/Shaw
Environmental
Butyrate had low matrix spike and
matrix spike duplicate recoveries.
Formate concentration in field blanks
were similar or greater than sample
data.
All samples and field blanks were qualified
with a "J-" qualifier for potential negative
bias taken into account for data usability.
Data for formate was rejected and qualified
with an "R" as unusable.
-------
A-103
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Glycols/ORD/NERL-Las
Vegas
Summary of QA/QC Results
The method for glycols was under
development.
Impact on Data/Usability
The QAPP stated that these data are to be
considered screening values until the
method was validated. Even though the
data are considered to be for screening
level evaluation, they are usable as on-
going QC checks provide confidence that
the method can detect glycols.
sVOC/ Region 8
Laboratory
Due to sample matrix (e.g., color,
turbidity), sample NDGW09-102012
and its MS/MSD samples were diluted
by a factor of 5. This resulted in most
MS/MSD sample concentrations near
or below the reporting limit, which
cannot be evaluated accurately for
recovery. Only 4-nitroaniline, carbazole
and pentachlorophenol were above
the RL An appropriate MS/MSD for
the SVOCs is not available due to the
need for the dilution performed for
NDGW09-102012.
Because all sample results are non-detect
and are qualified with U, no additional
qualifiers were applied. The lack of an
MS/MSD should be taken into account for
data usability, i.e., lack of matrix spike
recovery results prevents evaluation of
specific analyte recoveries, although blank
spike recoveries were acceptable.
DRO/GRO/ Region 8
Laboratory
DRO: The MS/MSD recoveries for DRO
were below control limits at 43% and
29%, respectively.
GRO: All QA/QC criteria were met.
DRO: A "J-" qualifier was added to all
samples for potential negative bias taken
into account for data usability.
GRO: Meets project requirements.
O, H Stable Isotopes of
Water/ Shaw
Environmental
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements.
Sr Isotopes/ USGS
Laboratory- Denver
All QA/QC criteria were met.
Meets project requirements.
Ethoxylated Alcohols,
Alkylphenols, and
Acrylamide/ORD/NERL-
Las Vegas
No certified standards exist for
ethoxylated alcohols or ethoxylated
alkylphenols. Quantitation was
performed by obtaining the
approximate composition of a C12-C15
ethoxylate industrial surfactant from
Shell Chemical Company and using the
response factors to calculate the
approximate compositions of other
ethoxylate mixtures, as described in
SOP ECB-14.0.
Alkylphenols- Glass cartridges that
were certified to have low levels of
nonylphenol were purchased and used
for extraction (it is unclear how low of
concentrations of nonylphenol are
present, as that information is
proprietary). Regardless of their
All data would be qualified as estimates,
but because of other QA and analytical
issues this data was rejected.
The alkylphenol data was rejected and
qualified with an "R" because of laboratory
contamination in blanks and contamination
in field blanks.
-------
A-104
Table A2 5 Data Usability Summary1
Analysis/Lab
Summary of QA/QC Results
certification, the laboratory blank
measured a concentration of 21.5 ng/L
nonylphenol, presumably coming from
the cartridges. However, this
concentration is much lower than
conventional polypropylene SPE
cartridges.
Ethoxylated alcohols/ethoxylated
alkylphenols- Ethoxylates were also
measured in the method blank.
However, the method blank was
performed on a day when the distilled
water system in the building was
down, and water was transported in
glass bottles from a separate building.
When the water came back up, a
separate method blank was extracted
and analyzed, and no ethoxylates were
detected. Therefore, due to the
presence of ethoxylates in the field
blanks and other QC-related issues
described below, it is difficult to
determine whether most of the
groundwater samples contained any
appreciable concentrations of
ethoxylates. In addition there was no
quantification of the data and
therefore no concentration could be
assigned to the samples or field blanks.
Impact on Data/Usability
The alkylphenol data was rejected and
qualified with an "R" because of laboratory
contamination in blanks, contamination in
field blanks and no quantified or semi-
quantified data was reported.
1 QA/QC criteria and project requirements were met with exceptions as listed.
-------
A-105
Table A26 Data Qualifiers and Data Descriptors
Qualifier
U
J
J+
J-
B
H
*
R
Definition
The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported quantitation limit (QL).
The analyte was positively identified. The associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte
to the quality of the data generated because certain quality control criteria were not met, or the concentration of the
QL).
in the sample (due either
analyte was below the
The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
For both detected and non-detected results, there may be a low bias due to low spike recoveries or sample preservation issues.
The analyte is found in a blank sample above the QL and the concentration found in the sample is less than 10 times the concentration found
in the blank.
The sample was prepared or analyzed beyond the specified holding time. Sample results may be biased low.
Relative percent difference of a field or lab duplicate is outside acceptance criteria.
The data are unusable. The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample
control criteria. Sample results are not reported. The analyte may or may not be present in the sample.
and/or meet quality
Data Descriptors
Descriptor
NA
Definition
Not Applicable (See QAPP)
NR
Not Reported by Laboratory or Field Sampling Team
ND
Not Detected
NS
Not Sampled
-------
A-106
Table A27 Field QC data for YSI electrode measurements
Parameter
Electrode Reading Acceptance Range Performance Evaluation
July 18, 2011 initial/mid-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
pH
7840
225.6
6.94
7636-7971
222-252
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
July 18, 2011 end-of-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
pH
7821
221.8
6.95
7690-8080
204-234
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
July 19, 2011 initial
Specific Conductance
ORP
pH
7831
228
6.98
7630-8010
212-242
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
July 19, 2011 mid-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
July 19, 2011 end-of-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
7850
219.8
6.97
7690-8080
204-234
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
July 20, 2011 initial
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
7921
225
7.12
7630-8010
212-242
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
July 20, 2011 mid-day/ end-of-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
pH
7821
221.6
7.01
7690-8080
204-234
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
October 18, 2011 initial
Specific Conductance
ORP
pH
7866
232.2
6.95
7630-7970
222-252
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
October 18, 2011 mid-day
Specific Conductance
7629
7630-7970
Acceptable
-------
A-107
Table A27 Field QC data for YSI electrode measurements
Parameter
ORP
PH
Electrode Reading
230.2
7.12
Acceptance Range
222-252
6.8-7.2
Performance Evaluation
Acceptable
Acceptable
October 18, 2011 end-of-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
7904
213.3
7.01
7600-7970
229-261
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
October 19, 2011 initial
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
7926
226.1
6.95
7630-7970
222-252
6.8-7.2
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
October 19, 2011 mid-day/ end-of-day
Specific Conductance
ORP
PH
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
-------
A-108
Table A28 Tentatively identified compounds (TICs) for sVOCs
Sample
Compound (CAS Number)
Estimated
Concentration
NDGW01-072011
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
0.43
NDGW03-072011
Triallyl isocyanurate (1025-15-6)
0.35
NDGW04-072011
Toluene (108-88-3)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
0.26
1.45
NDGW05-072011
Dichloronitromethane (7119-89-3)
l-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (872-50-4)
Caprolactam (105-60-2)
2-methyl-propanoic acid (79-31-2)
0.33
0.26
0.50
0.30
NDGW07-072011
2-ethyl-l-hexanol (104-76-7)
2-ethyl-hexanoic acid (149-57-5)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
3.69
9.58
0.95
NDGW08-072011
l,l'-oxybis-2-propanol (108-61-2)
2-ethyl-l-hexanol (104-76-7)
l-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (872-50-4)
Butoxyacetic acid (2516-93-0)
Caprolactam (105-60-2)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
0.27
2.13
0.46
0.61
0.54
2.80
NDGW09-072011
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
2.50
NDGW10-072011
Cyclohexanone (108-94-1)
Diethyltoluamide (134-62-3)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-hexanedioic acid (103-23-1)
31.3
0.30
0.29
NDGW10-072011 DUP
4-methyl-3-penten-2-one (141-79-7)
36.1
NDGW11-072011
1,1-demethylethyl-hexadecanoic acid (31158-91-5)
4-4'-di-tert-butylbiphenyl (1625-91-8)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-hexanedioic acid (103-23-1)
0.76
0.46
0.47
NDGW12-072011
4-methyl-3-penten-2-one (141-79-7)
3.51
NDGW14-072011
Caprolactam (105-60-2)
Dodecanoic acid (143-07-7)
Triallyl isocyanurate (1025-15-6)
Oxybenzone (131-57-7)
Cyclic octaatomic sulfur (10544-50-0)
0.44
0.29
0.49
0.47
6.02
NDGW15-072011
2-methylpropylester hexadecanoic acid (110-34-9)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
Butyl ester octadecanoic acid (123-95-5)
Eicosane
0.27
1.72
1.43
0.26
NDGW15-072011DUP
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
0.30
-------
A-109
Table A28 Tentatively identified compounds (TICs) for sVOCs
NDGW16-072011
Field Blank 7/18/2011
Field Blank 7/19/2011
Field Blank 7/20/2011
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-hexanedioic acid (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-hexanedioic acid (103-23-1)
2-nonanone (821-55-6)
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
3,5-bis(l,l-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid (6386-
38-5)
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
1-ethoxy-butane (628-81-9)
2-nonanone (821-55-6)
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
3,5-bis(l,l-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid (6386-
38-5)
^^2
0.50
0.35
0.39
1.34
0.38
1.48
64.7
0.35
0.95
0.35
October 2011
NDGW01-102011
NDGW03- 102011
NDGW04- 102011
NDGW05- 102011
NDGW06- 102011
NDGW07-102011
NDGW08- 102011
NDGW09- 102011
NDGW10- 102011
NDGW11-102011
NDGW12- 102011 DUP
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Propylene glycol (57-55-6)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Isobutyl octyl ester phthalic acid (1000309-04-5)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (11-06-8)
Propylene glycol (57-55-6)
l-methyl-2-pyrolidone (872-50-4)
Isobutyl octyl ester phthalic acid (1000309-04-5)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
Di(propylene glycol) (110-98-5)
2-ethyl-l-hexanol (104-76-7)
2-ethyl-hexanoic acid (149-57-5)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Di(propylene glycol) (110-98-5)
2-ethyl-l-hexanol (104-76-7)
2-(2-hydroxypropxy)-l-propanol (106-62-7)
2-ethyl-hexanoic acid
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (4376-20-9)
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
Mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (4376-20-9)
Mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (4376-20-9)
0.75
0.28
0.95
3.84
0.33
0.37
0.61
0.27
0.33
0.44
0.62
2.54
6.75
0.77
1.77
2.45
0.72
0.58
0.62
0.27
1.01
0.57
0.28
0.29
0.30
-------
Table A28 Tentatively identified compounds (TICs) for sVOCs
A-110
I
NDGW13-102011
Octadecanoicacid (57-11-4)
Heptadecane (629-78-7)
Heneicosane (629-94-7)
Eicosane (112-95-8)
Heptacosane (593-49-7)
0.39
0.30
0.34
0.42
0.26
NDGW14-102011
Propylene glycol (57-55-6)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
0.55
0.82
NDGW16-102011
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
0.45
Field Blank 10/18/2011
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
1.17
Field Blank 10/19/2011
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
Butyl ester hexadecanoic acid (111-06-8)
tober20f
1.48
0.44
Field Blank 1-102012
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
0.640
Field Blank 2-102012
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1620-98-0)
2-undecanone (112-12-9)
0.540
0.710
NDGW02-102012
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (79-34-5)
1,2,3-trichloro-l-propene (13116-58-0)
3.57
3.40
NDGW04-102012
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
1,2,3-trichloro-l-propene (13116-58-0)
0.740
1.16
NDGW07-102012
2-ethyl-hexanoic acid
l,l'-oxybis-2-propanol
2-ethyl-l-hexanol
0.660
2.25
1.64
NDGW08-102012
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
1.58
NDGW14-102012
Butylated hydroxytoluene (128-37-0)
0.940
-------
A-lll
Table A29 QA/QC Narrative Associated with the Killdeer Field TSA
Finding/Observation
Document the YSI 5580 Confidence
Solution
QC Narrative
During the audit, it was
recommended to the field team to
be sure to document in the
notebooks the information on the
YSI 5580 Confidence Solution. This
is a recommended step to ensure
traceability. This is recommended
for any other reagent information
that is associated with calibration.
Response
The YSI confidence solution
information (Lot number and
expiration date) was documented in
the field notebook at the time of the
audit.
-------
Appendix B Sample Results, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix B
Sample Results
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC
May 2015
EPA/600/R-14/103
B-l
-------
Appendix B Sample Results, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table of Contents
Tables
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-6
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-ll
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-16
Table B-4 Sample Results-Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-31
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols,
and Low Molecular Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-45
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds
(Killdeer, North Dakota) B-52
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-73
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota) B-80
B-2
-------
B-3
Appendix B. Sample Results - Legend (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Data Qualifiers
< The analyte concentration is less than the quantitation limit (QL).
The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported QL.
The analyte was positively identified. The associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample (due either to the quality of the data
u
j
j-
B
H
*
R
Notes
Table B-l
Table B-2
Table B-3
Table B-4
Table B-5
Table B-8
generated because certain quality control criteria were not met, or the concentration of the analyte was below the QL).
The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
For both detected and non-detected results, the result is estimated but may be biased low.
The analyte is found in a blank sample above the QL and the concentration found in the sample is less than 10 times the concentration found in the blank.
The sample was prepared or analyzed beyond the specified holding time. Sample results may be biased low.
Relative percent difference of a field or lab duplicate is outside acceptance criteria.
The data are unusable. The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and/or meet quality control criteria. Sample results are not
reported. The analyte may or may not be present in the sample.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is estimated based on Specific Conductance (SPC): TDS(mg/L) = SPC(mS/cm) * 650.
Field-determined concentrations of ferrous iron and hydrogen sulfide are screening values.
Round 1 -1 Not sampled because well went dry.
Round 1 -1 Not sampled because well went dry.
Round 1 -11 High uranium results may be due to spectral interference and/or high quantitation limits using ICP-OES. No primary MCL exceedances for U (>30 |ag/L) were
observed in the October 2011 sampling event. Future sampling events will analyze U using ICP-MS.
R. Data rejected. Potential spectral (mass or emission) interference for Sb Rounds 1 and 2.
R. Data rejected. 1,1,2-trichloroethane is subject to alkaline hydrolysis to 1,1-dichloroethene. This reaction could be supported by the sample preservative (trisodium
phosphate).
R. Data rejected. Acetate contamination in samples and blanks is due to the sample preservative (trisodium phosphate) for Round 1.
The method used forglycol analysis is under development. Round 2 - Tetraethylene Gycol data rejected due to low recoveries on spikes and CCVs.
Round 2 - R. Data rejected. Dissolved gas field and trip blank on 10/18/11 was unusable due to carryover in the gas chromatograph from a standard analyzed prior to this field
and trip blank.
Round 3 - R. Data rejected. Formate contamination in Field Blanks.
Round 3 - R. Data Rejected. Lab analytical issues.
-------
B-4
Appendix B. Sample Results - Legend (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Acronyms
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
DIC Dissolved Inorganic Carbon
DO Dissolved Oxygen
DOC Dissolved Organic Carbon
DRO Diesel Range Organics
GRO Gasoline Range Organics
NA Not Applicable (See QAPP)
ND Not Detected
NR Not Reported by Laboratory or Field Sampling Team
NS Not Sampled
ORP Oxidation reduction potential
SPC Specific Conductance
IDS Total Dissolved Solids
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Units
°c
mg/L
mS/cm
Key
GW
03
d
Degrees Celsius
Micrograms per liter
Milligrams per liter
Millisiemens per centimeter at 25°C
Ground water sample
Sampling location
Field Duplicate
-------
B-5
Appendix B. Sample Results. Legend (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Metals and Isotopes
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Silver
Aluminum
Arsenic
Boron
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Iron
K
Li
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
Ni
P
Pb
Rb
S
Sb
Potassium
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Sodium
Nickel
Phosphorus
Lead
Rubidium
Sulfur
Antimony
Se
Si
Sr
Th
Ti
Tl
U
V
Zn
Selenium
Silicon
Strontium
Thorium
Titanium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
62H [(2H/H) Sample/(2H/H) Standard] * 1000
61S0 [(1S0/160) Sample/(180/160) Standard] * 1000
-------
B-6
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02 GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Temperature
SPC
IDS
DO
PH
ORP
Turbidity
Alkalinity
Ferrous Iron
Hydrogen Sulfide
°C
mS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mV
NTU
mg CaCO3/L
mg Fe2+/L
mgS/L
8.5
0.536
359
9.19
7.67
139
0.7
270
<0.03 U
<0.01U
9.4
0.726
472
0.12
8.28
-Til
0.4
283
NR
NR
8.1 J
1.034 J
672 J
3.99 J
8.17 J
45 J
0.5 J
292 J
0.04 J
0.03 J
10.4
1.036
694
0.09
7.56
88
0.8
328
0.36 J
0.04 J
8.8
1.020
663
0.33
8.62
-60
1.5
331
0.10 J
0.01 J
8.6 J
0.995 J
647 J
0.48 J
8.2 J
71 J
11.5 J
344 J
0.07 J
<0.01 U
10.4
0.887
594
1.58
8.58
80
1.1
351
<0.03 U
<0.01 U
8.5
0.856
556
0.87
8.37
84
2.1
256
NR
NR
8.2 J
0.891 J
579 J
4.35 J
7.53 J
42 J
0.1J
381 J
<0.03 U
0.01 J
-------
B-7
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW04 GW04 GW04 GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Temperature
SPC
IDS
DO
PH
ORP
Turbidity
Alkalinity
Ferrous Iron
Hydrogen Sulfide
°C
mS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mV
NTU
mg CaCO3/L
mg Fe2+/L
mgS/L
10
1.850
1240
0.35
8.32
-63
3.8
454
1.01 J
0.40 J
8.6
1.939
1261
0.08
7.34
-43
7.9
439
0.36 J
0.04 J
8.7 J
2.077 J
1350 J
0.3 J
7.34 J
-93 J
3.4 J
413 J
0.17 J
0.01 J
11.7
1.220
817
0.17
8.03
-26
0.7
360
<0.03 U
0.08 J
9.1
1.091
709
1.86
9.33
-8
0.5
331
<0.03 U
0.02 J
9.1 J
1.068 J
694 J
1.58 J
8.17J
47 J
1.0 J
390 J
<0.03 U
0.02 J
11.8
1.059
710
0.07
7.45
91
0.9
355
<0.03 U
0.07 J
7.2
0.732
476
0.36
7.87
-236
0.5
331
<0.03 U
0.02 J
9.4 J
1.167 J
759 J
0.54 J
8.16 J
46 J
0.8 J
437 J
<0.03 U
0.01 J
-------
B-8
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08 GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Temperature
SPC
IDS
DO
PH
ORP
Turbidity
Alkalinity
Ferrous Iron
Hydrogen Sulfide
°C
mS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mV
NTU
mg CaCO3/L
mg Fe2+/L
mgS/L
10.5
2.430
1628
0.32
8.78
-21
2.5
335
1.19 J
0.45 J
8.7
3.921
2549
2.57
7.52
-80
0.7
319
0.85 J
0.03 J
9.6 J
2.927 J
1903 J
0.28J
7.43 J
-74 J
1.8 J
440 J
0.61 J
0.03 J
11.5
8.225
5511
0.22
7.38
-111
8.8
331
1.71 J
0.04 J
9.7
6.250
4063
0.57
7.33
-157
7.1
385
0.8 J
0.02 J
11.1 J
2.984 J
1940 J
0.22 J
7.39 J
-171 J
44.3 J
446 J
1.14J
0.03 J
11.9
1.880
1260
1.07
8.90
-104
1.5
771
0.42 J
0.09 J
10.1
1.922
1249
0.14
8.40
71
1.0
787
0.13 J
0.08 J
11.2J
1.851 J
1203 J
0.33 J
8.63 J
-173 J
1.2J
842 J
0.13 J
0.08 J
-------
B-9
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11 GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Temperature
SPC
IDS
DO
PH
ORP
Turbidity
Alkalinity
Ferrous Iron
Hydrogen Sulfide
°C
mS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mV
NTU
mg CaCO3/L
mg Fe2+/L
mgS/L
22.5
2.132
1428
1.95
7.21
121
115
684
<0.03 U
0.30 J
11.2
2.133
1386
1.42
7.24
56
NR
NR
NR
NR
20.9
0.946
634
1.13
7.52
-117
2.8
390
0.70 J
<0.01 U
10.8
0.942
612
1.38
7.51
-114
NR
NR
NR
NR
21.2
0.852
571
1.26
7.57
100
0.5
354
0.37 J
<0.01 U
10.1
0.856
556
1.67
7.52
46
NR
NR
NR
NR
20.8
1.077
722
1.57
7.47
-103
2.0
422
0.31 J
0.04 J
9.3
1.005
653
1.38
7.60
-154
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
B-10
Table B-l Sample Results - Field Parameters (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1
Sample GW14 GW14 GW14 GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 2
Temperature
SPC
IDS
DO
PH
ORP
Turbidity
Alkalinity
Ferrous Iron
Hydrogen Sulfide
°C
mS/cm
mg/L
mg/L
mV
NTU
mg CaCO3/L
mg Fe2+/L
mgS/L
14.7
1.286
862
1.74
7.77
-110
16.7
526
0.73 J
0.18J
9.5
1.360
884
0.22
7.68
-153
7.3
524
0.32 J
0.08 J
5.2J
1.31J
852 J
0.23J
7.83 J
-171 J
27 J
537 J
0.41 J
0.04 J
17.4
1.405
941
2.34
7.45
-111
2.8
486
1.37 J
0.46 J
9.7
1.417
921
2.45
7.41
-105
NR
NR
NR
NR
23.0
1.511
1012
2.44
7.38
-109
6.1
454
0.29 J
0.02 J
8.6
2.001
1301
2.28
7.26
-110
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
B-ll
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02 GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Anion-Cation
Balance
DOC
DIG
Nitrate + Nitrite
Ammonia
Bromide
Chloride
Sulfate
Fluoride
Iodide
%
mg/L
mg/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MQ/L
0.6
2.07
70.2
0.43
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
15.4
85.6
0.40
NR
1.1
2.35
61.3 J-
0.24
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
19.1
137
0.37
NR
1.1
2.63
74.1
0.25
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
29.9
206
0.21
<10.0U
1.0
1.62
92.2
0.58
<0.10 U
1.48
2.38
206
0.23
NR
3.7
35.9
85. 6 J-
0.56
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
1.72
210
0.24
NR
0.7
1.41
86
0.93
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
1.73
182
0.13 J
<10.0 U
3.5
2.30
92.7
0.67
0.01 J
<1.00 U
3.49
117
0.37
NR
2.4
1.85
86. 1J-
0.31
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
3.06
110
0.40
NR
1.6
1.48
96
0.30
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
2.15
112
0.21
<10.0 U
-------
B-12
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW04 GW04 GW04 GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Anion-Cation
Balance
DOC
DIG
Nitrate + Nitrite
Ammonia
Bromide
Chloride
Sulfate
Fluoride
Iodide
%
mg/L
mg/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MQ/L
2.5
3.14
119
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<4.00 U
13.9
566
<0.80 U
NR
1.7
3.13
110 J-
0.04 J
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
12.3
596
0.16 J
NR
0.8
3.10
111
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
11.3
748
0.31
<10.0 U
3.3
2.41
99.9
1.13
<0.10 U
1.15
10.4
203
0.24
NR
5.2
2.23
90.7 J-
1.40
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
8.87
216
0.26
NR
0.3
1.94
98.1
1.41
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
7.84
164
0.14J
<10.0 U
0.5
2.56
100
1.21
<0.10 U
1.11
9.83
169
0.30
NR
1.3
2.28
87.9 J-
1.26
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
9.40
138
0.23
NR
3.8
1.53
77.5
1.18
<0.10 U
0.26 J
122
74.5
0.14J
<10.0 U
-------
B-13
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08 GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Anion-Cation
Balance
DOC
DIG
Nitrate + Nitrite
Ammonia
Bromide
Chloride
Sulfate
Fluoride
Iodide
%
mg/L
mg/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MQ/L
2.7
2.71
91.4
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<3.00 U
545
214
0.22
NR
2.0
2.24
72.0 J-
0.05 J
<0.10 U
8.39 H
1760
144
<0.80 U
NR
0.7
3.53
107
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
2.27
631
192
<0.20 U
321
0.6
4.95
88.8
<0.10
0.03 J
<11.0U
2940
419
<2.20 U
NR
4.4
7.67
99.1 J-
0.02 J
<0.10 U
6.92
1540
505
<1.60 U
NR
0.5
5.73
107
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.76 J
229
703
0.17 J
117
3.9
6.12
201
<0.10 U
0.29
1.09
2.31
220
3.10
NR
1.4
6.42
182 J-
0.02 J
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
1.78
220
2.98
NR
1.0
6.44
188
<0.10 U
0.21
<1.00 U
1.70
224
2.83
<10.0 U
-------
B-14
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11 GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Anion-Cation
Balance
DOC
DIG
Nitrate + Nitrite
Ammonia
Bromide
Chloride
Sulfate
Fluoride
Iodide
%
mg/L
mg/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MQ/L
1.8
6.48
192
9.94
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
39.2
396
0.30
NR
3.6
5.81
175 J-
13.9
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
35.0
381
0.20
NR
0.1
2.98
110
<0.10 U
0.07 J
<1.00 U
0.84 J
83.9
0.45
NR
1.6
3.39
102 J-
0.02 U
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
0.67 J
83.2
0.45
NR
2.3
2.49
102
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
3.70
76.3
0.32
NR
0.2
2.28
95. 2 J-
0.20
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
3.85
76.7
0.37
NR
1.9
3.67
113
<0.10 U
0.19
0.47
1.03
125
0.50
NR
0.7
3.55
109 J-
<0.10 U
0.15
<1.00 U
1.28
123
0.42
NR
-------
B-15
Table B-2 Sample Results - Anions and Ammonia (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1
Sample GW14 GW14 GW14 GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 2
Anion-Cation
Balance
DOC
DIG
Nitrate + Nitrite
Ammonia
Bromide
Chloride
Sulfate
Fluoride
Iodide
%
mg/L
mg/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MQ/L
0.1
3.48
135
0.05 U
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
1.13
177
0.24
NR
0.9
3.50
130 J-
0.02 J
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
1.03
180
0.29
NR
0.6
3.23
133
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<1.00 U
0.90 J
189
0.16
<10.0 U
0.7
3.84
137
<0.10 U
0.23
1.21
3.56
236
0.54
NR
0.5
3.73
131 J-
<0.10 U
0.17
<1.00 U
3.17
224
0.46
NR
0.3
3.98
132
<0.10 U
0.25
2.03
8.15
310
0.45
NR
1.4
4.33
143 J-
<0.10 U
0.26
<1.00 U
12.8
447
0.33
NR
-------
B-16
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02 GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Round 3
Dissolved Ag
Total Ag
Dissolved Al
Total Al
Dissolved As
Total As
Dissolved B
Total B
Dissolved Ba
Total Ba
Dissolved Be
Total Be
Dissolved Ca
Total Ca
Dissolved Cd
Total Cd
Dissolved Co
Total Co
Dissolved Cr
Total Cr
Dissolved Cu
Total Cu
Dissolved Fe
Total Fe
Dissolved Hg
Total Hg
Dissolved K
Total K
Dissolved Li
Total Li
Dissolved Mg
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
151 J
146 J
47 J
47 J
<10U
<11U
39.0
38.4 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
8J
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.48 J
3.46 J
NA
NA
11.0
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
129 J
136 J
51J
53 J
<10U
<11U
43.1
45. 3 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.52 J
3.68 J
NR
NR
12.2
<10U
<10U
<20U
<20U
<0.2U
0.3
146
144
77
74
<5 U
<3 U
68.1
64.7
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<5 U
3.0
2.6
1.0
1.2
79 J
<50U
<0.2U
<0.2U
4.6
4.4
28
27
19.8
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
175 J
172 J
59 J
59 J
<10U
<11U
51.2
51.3 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
16 J
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
4.09 J
4.10 J
NA
NA
21.8
<14U
NR
<494U
NR
<20U
NR
159 J
NR
42 J
NR
<10U
NR
47.6
NR
<4U
NR
<4U
NR
<7U
NR
<20U
NR
<67U
NR
NR
NR
3.92J
NR
NR
NR
20.6
<10U
<10U
<20U
243
<0.2U
0.5
187
159
50
60
<5 U
<3 U
42.9
42.5
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
2J
<2.0U
<2.0U
0.7
1.5
69 J
642
<0.2U
<0.2U
4.0
3.9
32
31
19.1
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
146 J
141 J
72 J
74 J
<10U
<11U
49.4
50. 2 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
8J
<67U
37 J
NR
NR
4.75 J
4.89 J
NA
NA
13.7
<14U
<16U
<494U
316 J
<20U
<22U
140 J
148 J
67 J
80 J
<10U
<11U
46.1
48.4 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
<67U
376 J
NR
NR
4.52 J
4.77 J
NR
NR
12.8
<10U
<10U
<20U
<20U
0.02
0.3
159
145
72
70
<5U
<3U
50.3
48.2
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<5 U
0.5 J
<2.0U
0.7
0.60
58 J
<50U
<0.2U
<0.2U
4.6
4.2
23
22
14.3
-------
B-17
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW04 GW04 GW04 GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Dissolved Ag
Total Ag
Dissolved Al
Total Al
Dissolved As
Total As
Dissolved B
Total B
Dissolved Ba
Total Ba
Dissolved Be
Total Be
Dissolved Ca
Total Ca
Dissolved Cd
Total Cd
Dissolved Co
Total Co
Dissolved Cr
Total Cr
Dissolved Cu
Total Cu
Dissolved Fe
Total Fe
Dissolved Hg
Total Hg
Dissolved K
Total K
Dissolved Li
Total Li
Dissolved Mg
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
258 J
246 J
78 J
78 J
<10U
<11U
96.8
95.8 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
8J
216
327 J
NR
NR
6.09 J
6.17 J
NA
NA
41.2
<14U
<16U
<494U
217 J
<20U
<22U
252 J
264 J
71 J
73 J
<10U
<11U
98.5
102 J
<4U
<4U
1J
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
308
476 J
NR
NR
5.82 J
6.02 J
NR
NR
39.6
<10U
<10U
<20U
58
0.8
1.0
260
251
65
64
<5 U
<3 U
119
115
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
1J
0.5 J
<2.0U
1.0
1.6
335
269
<0.2U
<0.2U
6.2
6.1
59 J
53
47.5
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
207 J
195 J
23 J
23 J
<10U
<11U
42.8
43. 3 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
11 J
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.61J
3.61J
NA
NA
13.6
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
192 J
202 J
21 J
23 J
<10U
<11U
42.9
43.6 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
10 J
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.44 J
3.61J
NR
NR
13.5
<10U
<10U
<20U
25
<0.2U
0.3
202
192
21
21
<5 U
<3 U
37.7
36.6
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<5 U
<2.0U
<2.0U
1.0
1.5
40 J
<50U
<0.2U
<0.2U
3.5
3.3
26
25
12.3
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
200 J
197 J
36 J
37 J
<10U
<11U
52.0
51.8 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.59J
3.59J
NA
NA
18.0
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
187 J
197 J
28 J
30 J
<10U
<11U
43.5
44. 2 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
7J
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
3.22J
3.34J
NR
NR
15.3
<10U
<10U
<20U
<20U
<0.2U
0.3
185
179
40
38
<5U
<3U
53.3
49.7
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<5 U
<2.0U
<2.0U
0.9
1.2
64 J
<50U
<0.2U
0.01 J
3.8
3.6
31
30
18.9
-------
B-18
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08 GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Dissolved Ag
Total Ag
Dissolved Al
Total Al
Dissolved As
Total As
Dissolved B
Total B
Dissolved Ba
Total Ba
Dissolved Be
Total Be
Dissolved Ca
Total Ca
Dissolved Cd
Total Cd
Dissolved Co
Total Co
Dissolved Cr
Total Cr
Dissolved Cu
Total Cu
Dissolved Fe
Total Fe
Dissolved Hg
Total Hg
Dissolved K
Total K
Dissolved Li
Total Li
Dissolved Mg
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
237 J
236 J
103 J
104 J
<10U
<11U
134
134 J
<4U
<4U
1J
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
11J
1430
1430 J
NR
NR
6.71 J
6.72 J
NA
NA
54.4
<14U
19 J
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
238 J
254 J
259 J
263 J
<10U
<11U
377
384 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
4280
4300 J
NR
NR
11.4J
11.8J
NR
NR
158
<10U
<10U
<20U
<20U
1.0
1.1
348
342
102
97
<5 U
<3 U
149
163
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
10
8J
0.5 J
<2.0U
0.7
0.98
2090
1920
<0.2U
<0.2U
7.3
7.6
115
108
60.8
8J
18 U
<494U
189 J
<20U
<22U
188 J
198 J
173 J
173 J
<10U
<11U
583
580 J
<4U
<4U
4J
2J
<7U
<8U
9J
13 J
23700
23400 J
NR
NR
15. 1J
15. OJ
NA
NA
276
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
222 J
242 J
86 J
89 J
<10U
<11U
332
342 J
<4U
<4U
5
4J
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
15600
16200 J
NR
NR
10.9 J
11.5 J
NR
NR
158
<10U
<10U
<20U
<20U
3.1
3.7
228
224
33
33
<5 U
<3 U
126
119
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
4J
2J
<2.0U
<2.0U
1.0
1.3
6560
6850
<0.2U
<0.2U
6.7
6.9
108
103
59.3
<14U
<16U
<494U
222 J
<20U
<22U
447 J
469 J
18 J
20 J
<10U
<11U
3.53
4.23 J
<4U
<4U
1J
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
24 J
87 J
NR
NR
2.44 J
2.52 J
NA
NA
1.86
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
456 J
474 J
18 J
19 J
<10U
<11U
3.59
3.69 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
16 J
50 J
59 J
NR
NR
2.49 J
2.75 J
NR
NR
1.90
<10U
<10U
7J
<20U
<0.2U
0.3
476
475
17
18
<5U
<3U
3.36
3.27
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
1J
0.7 J
<2.0U
0.3 J
<0.5 U
41 J
45. 2 J
<0.2U
<0.2U
2.6 J
2.6
33 J
24
1.81
-------
B-19
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11 GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Dissolved Ag
Total Ag
Dissolved Al
Total Al
Dissolved As
Total As
Dissolved B
Total B
Dissolved Ba
Total Ba
Dissolved Be
Total Be
Dissolved Ca
Total Ca
Dissolved Cd
Total Cd
Dissolved Co
Total Co
Dissolved Cr
Total Cr
Dissolved Cu
Total Cu
Dissolved Fe
Total Fe
Dissolved Hg
Total Hg
Dissolved K
Total K
Dissolved Li
Total Li
Dissolved Mg
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
<14U
<16U
<494U
9010 J
<20U
<22U
392 J
380 J
59 J
151 J
<10U
<11U
95.0
96. 1J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
11
8J
<22U
<67U
6530 J
NR
NR
6.16 J
7.89 J
NA
NA
43.4
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
360 J
371 J
48 J
51J
<10U
<11U
89.7
92.1J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
8J
10 J
<67U
41 J
NR
NR
5.86 J
6.17J
NR
NR
41.0
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
177 J
167 J
51J
52J
<10U
<11U
32.8
32.4 J
<4U
<4U
1J
<4U
<7U
<8U
7J
<22U
816
1170 J
NR
NR
3.56J
3.61J
NA
NA
11.4
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
168 J
171 J
49 J
52 J
<10U
<11U
31.0
31.6J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
1060
1250 J
NR
NR
3.45 J
3.62 J
NR
NR
10.7
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
187 J
177 J
45 J
44 J
<10U
<11U
33.1
32.8 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
16 J
<22U
<67U
<74U
NR
NR
2.89 J
2.93 J
NA
NA
12.1
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
179 J
180 J
43 J
47 J
<10U
<11U
31.9
33. 2J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
9J
21 J
<67U
71 J
NR
NR
2.79 J
2.99 J
NR
NR
11.8
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
221 J
214 J
25 J
25 J
<10U
<11U
34.6
34.4 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
1120
1210 J
NR
NR
4.84 J
4.74 J
NA
NA
11.2
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
216 J
218 J
21 J
23 J
<10U
<11U
32.5
34.1 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
1000
1160 J
NR
NR
4.82 J
5.00 J
NR
NR
10.8
-------
B-20
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW14 GW14 GW14 GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Dissolved Ag
Total Ag
Dissolved Al
Total Al
Dissolved As
Total As
Dissolved B
Total B
Dissolved Ba
Total Ba
Dissolved Be
Total Be
Dissolved Ca
Total Ca
Dissolved Cd
Total Cd
Dissolved Co
Total Co
Dissolved Cr
Total Cr
Dissolved Cu
Total Cu
Dissolved Fe
Total Fe
Dissolved Hg
Total Hg
Dissolved K
Total K
Dissolved Li
Total Li
Dissolved Mg
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
<14U
<16U
<494U
425 J
<20U
<22U
224 J
212 J
22 J
32J
<10U
<11U
43.3
42.8 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
1430
4210 J
NR
NR
4.68 J
4.70 J
NA
NA
18.0
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
222 J
233 J
27 J
31J
<10U
<11U
42.1
43. 5 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
3320
3840 J
NR
NR
4.55 J
4.81 J
NR
NR
17.7
<10U
<10U
10 J
<20U
3.2
3.4
227
215
27
27
<5 U
<3 U
42.5
41.2
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<5 U
<2.0U
<2.0U
1.1
0.58
3120
3180
<0.2U
0.12 J
4.7 J
4.8
31J
28
18.8
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
338 J
331 J
25 J
26 J
<10U
<11U
44.2
44.3 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
1890
2550 J
NR
NR
5.65 J
5.70 J
NA
NA
19.8
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
331J
340 J
24 J
26 J
<10U
<11U
43.2
44.6 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
2290
2640 J
NR
NR
5.58J
5.79J
NR
NR
19.4
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
350 J
334 J
31J
32 J
<10U
<11U
63.9
63. 5 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
3410
3970 J
NR
NR
6.38J
6.34 J
NA
NA
26.3
<14U
<16U
<494U
<548U
<20U
<22U
340 J
353 J
39 J
50 J
<10U
<11U
98.5
121 J
<4U
<4U
<4U
<4U
<7U
<8U
<20U
<22U
5500
7650 J
NR
NR
7.18 J
7.84 J
NR
NR
41.1
-------
B-21
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02 GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Round 3
Total Mg
Dissolved Mn
Total Mn
Dissolved Mo
Total Mo
Dissolved Na
Total Na
Dissolved Ni
Total Ni
Dissolved P
Total P
Dissolved Pb
Total Pb
Dissolved S
Total S
Dissolved Sb
Total Sb
Dissolved Se
Total Se
Dissolved Si
Total Si
Dissolved Sr
Total Sr
Dissolved Th
Total Th
Dissolved Ti
Total Ti
Dissolved TI
Total TI
Dissolved U
Total U
mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
MgA
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
MgA
Mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
10.8 J
<14U
<16U
<17U
<19U
111J
110 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
27.8 J
26.9 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
6.50 J
6.07 J
264
259 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
12.6 J
<14U
<16U
<17U
<19U
112 J
114 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07J
<17U
<19U
46. 1J
45. 7 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
6.23 J
6.03 J
300
295 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
18.9
<5 U
0.2 J
2.1
2.2
135
138
2.4 B
3.1
<0.05 U
0.01 J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
0.11 J
0.12 J
<2U
<2U
6.5
6.2
462
428
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5U
<3U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
2.0
2.0
21.7 J
201
204 J
<17U
<19U
159 J
159 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
69.1 J
65. 3 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
9.64 J
9.31 J
413
413 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
23 J
<56U
NR
190
NR
8J
NR
154 J
NR
<84U
NR
<0.06 U
NR
<17U
NR
64.9 J
NR
R
R
19 J
NR
9.47 J
NR
393
NR
NR
NR
<7U
NR
<17U
NR
<50U
NR
18.9
166
228
2.6
2.7
161
166
2.1 B
3.0
<0.05 U
0.02 J
0.05 J
0.27
NR
NR
<0.20 U
0.18 J
0.6 J
<2U
8.6
9.1
345
333
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
6.7
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
2.4
2.5
14.0 J
212
230 J
<17U
<19U
137 J
135 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
39.6 J
37.2 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
7.70 J
7.45 J
336
341 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
20 J
19 J
13. 3 J
183
225 J
9J
11 J
130 J
132 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07J
<17U
<19U
35. 5 J
34.7 J
R
R
11J
<33U
7.64 J
8.08 J
323
317 J
NR
NR
<7U
14 J
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
13.8
200
192
6.4
6.6
148
149
2.3 B
2.6
<0.05 U
0.01 J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
1.6 J
0.8 J
7.3
6.9
340
321
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5U
<3U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
5.0
5.0
-------
B-22
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW04 GW04 GW04 GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Total Mg
Dissolved Mn
Total Mn
Dissolved Mo
Total Mo
Dissolved Na
Total Na
Dissolved Ni
Total Ni
Dissolved P
Total P
Dissolved Pb
Total Pb
Dissolved S
Total S
Dissolved Sb
Total Sb
Dissolved Se
Total Se
Dissolved Si
Total Si
Dissolved Sr
Total Sr
Dissolved Th
Total Th
Dissolved Ti
Total Ti
Dissolved TI
Total TI
Dissolved U
Total U
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
MgA
Hg/L
Mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
ug/L
Hg/L
ug/L
Hg/L
ug/L
lig/L
ug/L
lig/L
ug/L
40.7 J
479
464 J
<17U
<19U
292 J
290 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
184 J
173 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
8.51 J
8.93 J
950
933 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
10 J
37tJ
31* J
40.2 J
400
401 J
6J
7J
279 J
288 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
189 J
187 J
R
R
14 J
<33 U
8.48 J
8.96 J
935
922 J
NR
NR
<7U
6J
<17U
<19U
17 J
25 J
47
275
280
2.4
4.5
322
335
4.3 B
7.0
<0.05 U
0.02 J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<2U
<2U
7.8
7.8
1050
1030
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
1J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
4.9
5.4
13.4 J
91
95 J
<17U
<19U
196 J
201 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
66.9 J
62.4 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
6.82 J
6.61 J
299
302 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
19 J
<56U
13.7 J
60
60 J
9J
10 J
197 J
198 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.147 J
<17U
<19U
67.5 J
69.0 J
R
R
23 J
<33 U
6.53 J
6.68 J
293
291 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
11.9
29
29
3.4
3.6
200
205
2.0 B
2.1
<0.05 U
0.01 J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
2.3
1.7 J
6.4
6.3
260
274
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<3 U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
1.7
1.8
18.0 J
140
139 J
<17U
<19U
169 J
167 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
56.3 J
54.3 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
7.49 J
7.14J
401
397 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
19 J
<56U
15.4 J
86
83 J
11 J
10 J
152 J
153 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
44.4 J
43. 8 J
R
R
23 J
<33U
7.20 J
6.91 J
336
331 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
17.6
62
58
4.5
4.8
184
186
2.5 B
3.1
<0.05 U
0.01 J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
1.2J
1.4 J
6.8
6.5
414
381
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<3 U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
1.4
1.4
-------
B-23
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08 GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Total Mg
Dissolved Mn
Total Mn
Dissolved Mo
Total Mo
Dissolved Na
Total Na
Dissolved Ni
Total Ni
Dissolved P
Total P
Dissolved Pb
Total Pb
Dissolved S
Total S
Dissolved Sb
Total Sb
Dissolved Se
Total Se
Dissolved Si
Total Si
Dissolved Sr
Total Sr
Dissolved Th
Total Th
Dissolved Ti
Total Ti
Dissolved TI
Total TI
Dissolved U
Total U
mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
MgA
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
mg/L
mg/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
Mg/L
MJ/L
MJ/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
54.6 J
658
683 J
<17U
<19U
344 J
339 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
75.0 J
70.8 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
8.04 J
8.03 J
1260
1260 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
6J
21 J
39* J
40* J
158 J
815
834 J
6J
8J
556 J
556 J
46 J
46 J
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
55. 3 J
53. 8 J
R
R
19 J
19 J
7.86 J
7.86 J
3710
3640 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
24 J
<56U
58.5
336
332
3.1
3.3
411
430
171
172
0.12
0.04
0.14J
0.21
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<2U
<2U
7.2
7.1
1380
1310
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5U
<3U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
4.7
4.7
276 J
1450
1450 J
<17U
<19U
1040 J
1060 J
197
199 J
0.03 J
0.05 J
<17U
<19U
167 J
159 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
8.48 J
8.45 J
5100
5050 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
152
172 J
104* J
105* J
163 J
856
911J
6J
8J
610 J
627 J
196
206 J
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
173 J
174 J
R
R
19 J
16 J
8.49 J
8.64 J
2870
2810 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
18 J
20 J
57.7
420
418
7.3
7.6
407
437
38.2
41
0.06
0.03
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
0.7 J
<2U
7.8
7.7
1010
972
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5 U
<3 U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
3.9
4.0
1.92 J
11 J
13 J
<17U
<19U
463 J
468 J
<84U
<93 U
0.32 J
0.32 J
<17U
<19U
68.7 J
68.8 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
3.75 J
4.29 J
121
124 J
NA
NA
<7U
9J
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
1.95 J
11 J
12 J
11 J
11 J
436 J
450 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.306 J
<17U
<19U
67.9 J
68.9 J
R
R
34 J
12 J
3.72J
4.05 J
120
119 J
NR
NR
6J
7J
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
1.76
10
11
3.8
6.5
477
497
0.18 J
0.42
0.31
0.30
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<2U
<2U
4.0
3.8
117
122
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5U
2J
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
-------
B-24
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11 GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Total Mg
Dissolved Mn
Total Mn
Dissolved Mo
Total Mo
Dissolved Na
Total Na
Dissolved Ni
Total Ni
Dissolved P
Total P
Dissolved Pb
Total Pb
Dissolved S
Total S
Dissolved Sb
Total Sb
Dissolved Se
Total Se
Dissolved Si
Total Si
Dissolved Sr
Total Sr
Dissolved Th
Total Th
Dissolved Ti
Total Ti
Dissolved TI
Total TI
Dissolved U
Total U
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
MgA
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
MgA
44.9 J
353
891 J
<17U
<19U
368 J
368 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
0.08 J
<17U
<19U
123 J
121 J
R
R
<30U
<33U
11.5 J
33.8 J
1050
1050 J
NA
NA
<7U
317 J
<17U
9J
43tJ
29 J
42.3 J
244
251 J
10 J
<19U
360 J
361 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
123 J
123 J
R
R
40
<33 U
10.8 J
10.9 J
1010
983 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
27 J
18 J
11.3 J
77
76 J
31
<19U
178 J
178 J
<84U
<93 U
0.05 J
0.11 J
<17U
<19U
27. 2 J
25. 2 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
10.4 J
9.97 J
259
255 J
NA
NA
2J
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
11.0 J
75
77 J
10 J
9J
173 J
173 J
<84U
<93 U
0.12 J
0.10 J
<17U
<19U
26.6 J
25. 7 J
R
R
18 J
<33 U
10.3 J
9.98 J
252
249 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
12. 1J
63
64 J
<17U
<19U
152 J
153 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
24.8 J
23.0 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
7.60 J
7.10 J
280
280 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
12.3 J
95
231 J
5J
8J
151 J
154 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
25.4 J
24.5 J
R
R
15 J
<33 U
7.54 J
7.24 J
282
280 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
11.1 J
278
280 J
18
21 J
207 J
204 J
<84U
<93 U
0.10 J
<0.07 U
<17U
<19U
41.0 J
39.0 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
11.0 J
10.6 J
402
398 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
18 J
<56U
11.2 J
294
306 J
17
18 J
201 J
207 J
<84U
<93U
0.11 J
0.11 J
<17U
<19U
39.9 J
38.6 J
R
R
18 J
<33U
10.7 J
10.5 J
417
419 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
-------
B-25
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW14 GW14 GW14 GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Total Mg
Dissolved Mn
Total Mn
Dissolved Mo
Total Mo
Dissolved Na
Total Na
Dissolved Ni
Total Ni
Dissolved P
Total P
Dissolved Pb
Total Pb
Dissolved S
Total S
Dissolved Sb
Total Sb
Dissolved Se
Total Se
Dissolved Si
Total Si
Dissolved Sr
Total Sr
Dissolved Th
Total Th
Dissolved Ti
Total Ti
Dissolved TI
Total TI
Dissolved U
Total U
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Hg/L
Mg/L
Hg/L
ug/L
Hg/L
ug/L
lig/L
ug/L
uj/L
Mg/L
17.9 J
281
291 J
22
23 J
251 J
244 J
<84U
<93U
<0.06 U
0.04 J
<17U
<19U
56.6 J
54.5 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
11.4 J
12.4 J
561
551J
NA
NA
<7U
11 J
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
18.3 J
290
304 J
16 J
21 J
236 J
243 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.02 J
<17U
<19U
56.5 J
56.9 J
R
R
19 J
<33 U
12.1 J
12.2 J
565
547 J
NR
NR
<7U
6J
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
18.4
298
297
16.9
17.5
256
270
1.8 B
1.4
0.05 J
0.03
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
NR
NR
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<2U
<2U
11.4
11
541
529
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
<5U
<3U
<0.20 U
<0.20 U
1.6
1.6
19.9 J
338
340 J
22
20 J
263 J
265 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.04 J
<17U
<19U
72.2 J
70.6 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
13. OJ
12.9 J
610
610 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
22 J
19 J
20.0 J
328
340 J
18
18 J
256 J
258 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.03 J
<17U
<19U
73.3 J
71.5 J
R
R
20 J
<33 U
12.9 J
12.9 J
613
597 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
<50U
<56U
26.2 J
595
591 J
19
<19U
263 J
262 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.05 J
<17U
<19U
101 J
96.5 J
R
R
<30U
<33 U
13. 5 J
13. 1J
811
804 J
NA
NA
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
25 J
24 J
49.5 J
927
1130 J
15 J
14 J
261 J
268 J
<84U
<93 U
<0.06 U
0.03 J
<17U
<19U
147 J
159 J
R
R
11 J
<33 U
13.6 J
13.8 J
1260
1450 J
NR
NR
<7U
<8U
<17U
<19U
17 J
<56U
-------
B-26
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02 GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Round 3
Dissolved V
Total V
Dissolved Zn
Total Zn
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.13 J
0.27
<5 U
<3 U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
<10U
NR
<50U
NR
0.12 J
1.3
<5 U
2J
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.14J
0.36
<5 U
<3U
-------
B-27
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW04 GW04 GW04 GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Dissolved V
Total V
Dissolved Zn
Total Zn
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
<10U
5J
17 J
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.11 J
0.56
2J
<3 U
<10U
4J
<50U
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.21
0.53
1J
1J
<10U
4J
<50U
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.28
0.58
1J
2J
-------
B-28
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08 GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 3
Dissolved V
Total V
Dissolved Zn
Total Zn
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
3J
5J
21J
20 J
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.15 J
0.41
2J
2J
4J
7J
64
56 J
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.07 J
0.32
<5 U
<3 U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
<10U
<11U
<50U
<56U
0.06 J
0.39
<5 U
<3 U
-------
B-29
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Dissolved V
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
Sample GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11 GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
<10U
Total V
17 J
Dissolved Zn
28 J
<50U
34 J
116
32 J
71
<50U
<50U
Total Zn
50 J
<56U
93 J
33 J
27 J
36 J
<56U
<56U
-------
B-30
Table B-3 Sample Results - Dissolved and Total Metals (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Dissolved V
<10U
<10U
0.04 J
<10U
<10U
<10U
Sample GW14 GW14 GW14 GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
<10U
Total V
0.29
Dissolved Zn
<50U
<50U
<5 U
<50U
<50U
<50U
<50U
Total Zn
40 J
<56U
<3 U
<56U
<56U
<56U
<56U
-------
B-31
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-32
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
0.2 J
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
0.59 J
0.50
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-33
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-34
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
156
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
795
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
229
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
0.62
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
975
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
972
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
287
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-35
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
80.3 J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
3.77
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
0.45 J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-36
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<200 U,J-
<25.0 U
<25.0 U,J-
<0.5 U
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5U
R
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-37
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
ethanol (64-17-5)
isopropanol (67-63-0)
acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
styrene (100-42-5)
acetone (67-64-1)
tert-butyl alcohol (75-65-0)
methyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)
diisopropyl ether (108-20-3)
ethyl tert-butyl ether (637-92-3)
tert-amyl methyl ether (994-05-8)
vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
1,1-dichloroethene (75-35-4)
carbon disulfide (75-15-0)
methylene chloride (75-09-2)
trans-l,2-dichloroethene (156-60-5)
1,1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
cis-l,2-dichoroethene (156-59-2)
chloroform (67-66-3)
1,1,1-trichloroethane (71-55-6)
carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
benzene (71-43-2)
1,2-dichloroethane (107-06-2)
trichloroethene (79-01-6)
toluene (108-88-3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane (79-00-5)
tetrachloroethene (127-18-4)
chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
m+p xylene (108-38-3, 106-42-3 )
o-xylene (95-47-6)
isopropylbenzene (98-82-8)
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (108-67-8)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NA
NA
<1.0 U,J-
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U,J-
R
<0.5 U,J-
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<100U
<25.0 U
NR
NR
<1.0U
<5.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<1.0U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U,J-
<1.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
R
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<1.0U
<2.0U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-38
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-39
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
0.39 J
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
0.26 J
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-40
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-41
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-42
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-43
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-44
Table B-4 Sample Results - Volatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (95-63-6)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (526-73-8)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
naphthalene (91-20-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Mi/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
<0.5 U
-------
B-45
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Parameter (CAS Number)
Round 1
Round 2 Round 3
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<20.0 U
29.3 B
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.0014 U
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<20U
38.7
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.46 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
40.3 J-
<25U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<20.0 U
<20.0 U
<5 U
<25U
<25U
<10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
<20.0 U,J-
<25U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
-------
B-46
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<0.0014 U
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<0.0014 U
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
28.5 B
20.9
42.9
<20.0 U
<20.0 U,J-
<20.0 U
45.6 B
23.6
53.8
<20.0 U
27.3 J-
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<25 U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<25U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.20 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10U
0.15 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
-------
B-47
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<0.0014 U
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
<0.0014 U
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
39.8 B
<20U
30.3
<20.0 U
<20.0 U,J-
<20.0 U
26.3 B
<20U
25.1
<20.0 U
31.0 J-
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<25 U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<25U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10U
0.15 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
-------
B-48
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0085 B
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0253 B
0.0044 B
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
81.5 B
<20U
53.1
<20.0 U
35. 8 J-
<20.0 U
92. 2 B
<20U
75.9
<20.0 U
70.9 J-
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<25 U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<25U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.45
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
<0.10 U
0.36
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
0.20
0.17 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
-------
B-49
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0101 B
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0008 J
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0013 J
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<20.0 U
120 B
<20U
96.9
<20.0 U
124 J-
77.9 B
67.3 B
<20U
57.6
<20.0 U
55.4 B,J-
<20U
46.0
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<25 U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.18 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10 U
0.12 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10 U
0.17 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
-------
B-50
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0004 J
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0024
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0132 B
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0030 U
<0.0042 U
<0.0052 U
<20.0 U
43. 3 B
<20U
25.7
<20.0 U
49.4 B
<20 U <20.0 U
43.4 | 65.4
<20U
53.5
<20.0 U
49.3 J-
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<25 U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.14 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
0.11
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.13 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10 U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.39 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
R
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U,J-
-------
B-51
Table B-5 Sample Results - Dissolved Gases, Diesel and Gasoline Range Organics, Glycols, and Low Molecular
Weight Acids (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Dissolved Gases
Methane (74-82-8)
Ethane (74-84-0)
Propane (74-98-6)
Butane (106-97-8)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Diesel and Gas Range Organics
GRO/TPH
DRO
ug/L
ug/L
Glycols
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
Diethyleneglycol (111-46-6)
Triethylene glycol (112-27-6)
Tetraethylene glycol (112-60-7)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Low Molecular Weight Acids
Lactate (50-21-5)
Formate (64-18-6)
Acetate (64-19-7)
Propionate (79-09-4)
Butyrate (107-92-6)
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0056
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<0.0015 U
<0.0029 U
<0.0041 U
<0.0054 U
0.0041
<0.0028 U
<0.0039 U
<0.0049 U
<20.0 U
40.1 B
<20U
40.4
<20.0 U
43. 3 B
<20U
40.1
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25U
R
<5 U
<25 U
<25 U
<10U
<5 U
<50U
<25 U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.18 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
<0.10U
<0.10U
R
<0.10U
<0.10U
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
0.20 B
<0.10 U
<0.10 U
-------
B-52
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
Hg/L
tii/L
tii/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
-------
B-53
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
0.50 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
-------
B-54
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.46 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
0.81 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
-------
B-55
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
0.51 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
-------
B-56
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
tigA
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<10.0U
<10.0U
<10.0U
<10.0U
<10.0U
<15.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<25.0U
<5.00 U
<15.0U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
-------
B-57
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
tigA
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
0.91 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.53 B
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<2.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
-------
B-58
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^
Parameter (CAS Number)
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 2
R-(+)-limonene (5989-27-5)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)
1,2-dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
1,2-dinitrobenzene (528-29-0)
1,3-dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
1,3-dimethyladamantane (702-79-4)
1,3 -dinitrobenzene (99-65-0)
1,4-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
1,4-dinitrobenzene (100-25-4)
1-methylnaphthalene (90-12-0)
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (58-90-2)
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol (935-95-5)
2,4,5-trichlorophenol (95-95-4)
2,4,6-trichlorophenol (88-06-2)
2,4-dichlorophenol (120-83-2)
2,4-dimethylphenol (105-67-9)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
2,4-dinitrotoluene (121-14-2)
2,6-dinitrotoluene (606-20-2)
2-butoxyethanol (111-76-2)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
2-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2-methylnaphthalene (91-57-6)
2-methylphenol (95-48-7)
2-nitroaniline (88-74-4)
2-nitrophenol (88-75-5)
3&4-methylphenol (108-39-4 & 106-44-5)
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (91-94-1)
3-nitroaniline (99-09-2)
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol (534-52-1)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101-55-3)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol (59-50-7)
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U,J-
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
-------
B-59
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.11
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-60
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.56J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.48 J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-61
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
3.93 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.51J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
10.7 J+
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
2.69 J,B
1.51
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
0.54
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-62
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.58J,B
1.34
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
2.32 J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-63
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.34J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<15.0U
<5.00 U
<15.0U
<15.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<15.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<15.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.68
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.08
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
-------
B-64
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
1.52
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.12
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.09
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
3.78J,B
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<3.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<3.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-65
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^
Parameter (CAS Number)
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 2
4-chloroaniline (106-47-8)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether (7005-72-3)
4-nitroaniline (100-01-6)
4-nitrophenol (100-02-7)
Acenaphthene (83-32-9)
Acenaphthylene (208-96-8)
Adamantane (281-23-2)
Aniline (62-53-3)
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Azobenzene (103-33-3)
Benzo(a)anthracene (56-55-3)
Benzo(a)pyrene (50-32-8)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205-99-2)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207-08-9)
Benzoic Acid (65-85-0)
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)
Bis-(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1)
Bis-(2-chloroethyl)ether (111-44-4)
Bis-(2-chloroisopropyl)ether (108-60-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (103-23-1)
Bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-81-7)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
Carbazole (86-74-8)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene (53-70-3)
Dibenzofuran (132-64-9)
Diethyl phthalate (84-66-2)
Dimethyl phthalate (131-11-3)
Di-n-butyl phthalate (84-74-2)
Di-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0)
Diphenylamine (122-39-4)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
1.45
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
1.44 J+
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<2.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
2.31
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
-------
B-66
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-67
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-68
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-69
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-70
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<10.0U
<5.00 U
<5.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-71
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^ ^^^^H
Parameter (CAS Number)
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/20/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
tig/L
Hg/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<1.00U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
<2.00 U
<1.00 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-72
Table B-6 Sample Results - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (Killdeer, North Dakota)
^^^^^^m ^^^^^^M ^^^^^^m ^^^^^^
Parameter (CAS Number)
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 2
Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
Fluorene (86-73-7)
Hexachlorobenzene (118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene (87-68-3)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1)
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5)
Isophorone (78-59-1)
Naphthalene (91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9)
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (621-64-7)
Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
Phenol (108-95-2)
Pyrene (129-00-0)
Pyridine (110-86-1)
Squalene (111-02-4)
Terpiniol (98-55-5)
tri-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (78-51-3)
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
lig/L
lig/L
lig/L
Hg/L
liS/L
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
<0.50 U
<1.00 U
-------
B-73
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW01 GW01
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11
Round 1
Round 2
GW01
10/18/12
Round 3
GW02
GW02
7/18/11 10/18/11
Round 1 Round 2
GW02
10/17/12
Round 3
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
MgA
MgA
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-135.75
-17.21
-119.01
-15.10
NA
NA
-135.86
-16.87
-145.88
-18.85
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
300
0.70
0.708508
0.00333
0.0023
464
0.8
0.708464
0.002155172
0.001724138
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
409
0.25
0.708668
0.00244
0.0006
349
<0.5
0.708650
0.00286533
-------
B-74
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
GW04
GW04
7/18/11 10/18/11
Round 1 Round 2
GW04
10/17/12
Round 3
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
Hg/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-131.01
-16.68
-134.21
-17.23
NA
NA
-135.97
-17.09
-135.08
-17.52
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
333
1.10
0.708754
0.00300
0.0033
340
0.8
0.708717
0.002941176
0.002352941
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
968
1.10
0.708511
0.00103
0.0011
1130
0.8
0.708470
0.000884956
0.000707965
-------
B-75
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/17/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
GW06
GW06
7/18/11 10/18/11
Round 1 Round 2
GW06
10/18/12
Round 3
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
Hg/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-136.80
-17.69
-141.44
-18.39
NA
NA
-140.94
-17.99
-145.85
-18.97
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
298
0.70
0.708561
0.00336
0.0023
259
0.6
0.708511
0.003861004
0.002316602
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
347
0.70
0.708543
0.00288
0.0020
381
0.6
0.708498
0.002624672
0.001574803
-------
B-76
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
GW08
GW08
7/18/11 10/18/11
Round 1 Round 2
GW08
10/18/12
Round 3
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
Hg/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-141.35
-19.20
-146.12
-18.87
NA
NA
-140.08
-18.68
-139.31
-17.91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3790
1.00
0.708507
0.00026
0.0003
1480
<1.0
0.708487
0.000675676
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3000
1.00
0.708500
0.00033
0.0003
1080
<1.0
0.708486
0.000925926
-------
B-77
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09
Sample Date 7/18/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Unit Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
GW10
GW10
GW11
GW11
7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
Hg/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-127.42
-16.26
-129.21
-16.52
NA
NA
-120.78
-15.22
NA
NA
-127.67
-16.91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
129
3.20
0.707568
0.00775
0.0248
112
2.6
0.707534
0.008928571
0.023214286
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
0.80
0.708663
0.00099
0.0008
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
263
0.50
0.708631
0.00380
0.0019
-------
B-78
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/19/11 7/19/11 10/18/11 10/18/12
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Round 1 Round 2
Round 3
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
Hg/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-127.20
-15.93
NA
NA
-130.95
-17.80
NA
NA
-130.67
-16.58
-131.40
-16.92
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
287
0.25
0.708610
0.00348
0.0009
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
414
0.60
0.708539
0.00242
0.0014
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
581
0.90
0.708547
0.00172
0.0015
575
0.8
0.708537
0.00173913
0.001391304
-------
B-79
Table B-7 Sample Results - Water Isotopes and Strontium Isotopes (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/11 10/19/11 10/19/11
Round 1 Round 2
Round 2
Water Isotopes
62H
6180
%0
%0
Strontium Isotopes
Sr
Rb
87Sr/86Sr
1/Sr
Rb/Sr
Hg/L
tii/L
Atom Ratio
L/Hg
Weight Ratio
NA
NA
-115.83
-14.47
-114.64
-14.35
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
626
1.50
0.708429
0.00160
0.0024
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
B-80
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW01 GW01 GW01 GW02 GW02 GW02
Sample Date 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/17/2012
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
Mf/L
Mf/L
Mf/L
Mf/L
Mf/L
Mf/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
-------
B-81
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW03 GW03 GW03 GW04 GW04 GW04
Sample Date 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/17/2012 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/17/2012
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.8U
1.3 B
<0.3 U
0.8 B
<0.3 U
<1U
<0.05 U
<0.01 U
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
-------
B-82
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW05 GW05 GW05 GW06 GW06 GW06
Sample Date 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/17/2012 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
-------
B-83
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW07 GW07 GW07 GW08 GW08 GW08
Sample Date 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.8U
1.6 B
<0.3 U
0.8 B
0.5
<1U
<0.05 U
<0.01 U
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.8U
1.2 B
<0.3 U
0.4 B
<0.3 U
<1U
<0.05 U
<0.01 U
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
-------
B-84
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW09 GW09 GW09 GW10 GW10 GW11 GW11
Sample Date 7/18/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012 7/19/2011 10/19/2011 7/19/2011 10/19/2011
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 1
Round 2
Round 1
Round 2
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
uj/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.8U
1.9 B
<0.3 U
<0.3 U
<0.3 U
<1U
<0.05 U
<0.01 U
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
<0.01 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
B-85
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW12 GW12 GW13 GW13 GW14 GW14 GW14
Sample Date 7/19/2011 10/19/2011 7/19/2011 10/19/2011 7/19/2011 10/18/2011 10/18/2012
Round 1
Round 2
Round 1
Round 2
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
uj/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
uj/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.02
-------
B-86
Table B-8 Sample Results - Surfactants and Ethoxylates (Killdeer, North Dakota)
Parameter
Sample GW15 GW15 GW16
Sample Date 7/19/2011 10/19/2011 10/19/2011
Round 1
Round 2
Round 2
Octylphenol ethoxylate
Nonylphenol ethoxylate
Ethoxylated alcohol C12
Ethoxylated alcohol C13
Ethoxylated alcohol C14
nonylphenol
Octylphenol
Acrylamide
Mi/L
tii/L
tii/L
tii/L
tii/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
Hg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix C
Background Data
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC
May 2015
EPA/600/R-14/103
C-l
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table of Contents
Table of Contents C-2
List of Tables C-3
List of Figures C-4
C.I. Land Use C-5
C.2. Search Area C-5
C.2.1. Land Use C-5
C.2.2. Crop Land C-6
C.2.3. Land Use Changes C-6
C.3. Environmental Records Search C-6
C.3.1. Oil and Gas Well Inventory C-7
C.3.2. State Record Summary C-7
C.4. Evaluation of Data for the Killdeer Site C-7
C.4.1. Environmental Records Search Report Summary C-7
C.4.2. Oil and Gas Well Inventory Summary C-8
C.4.3. State Record Summary C-9
C.5. References C-9
Attachment 1 EDR Record Search C-45
C-2
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
May 2015
List of Tables
Table C-l Major Agricultural Land Uses in Dunn County in 2012 C-12
Table C-2 Changes in Land Use, 1992 to 2001 and 2001 to 2006, in Dunn County C-12
Largest Industries, by Employment, in Dunn County in 2011 C-13
Land Use in the Search Area in 1992 and 2006 C-13
Major Agricultural Land Uses in the Search area in 2012 C-14
Changes in Land Use, 1992 to 2001 and 2001 to 2006, in the Search Area C-14
Table C-3
Table C-4
Table C-5
Table C-6
Table C-7
Environmental Database Review Summary, Killdeer Retrospective Case Study, North
Dakota [[[ C-15
Table C-8 Well Inventory Summary, Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Site .................................... C-33
Table C-9 Number of Oil and Gas Wells within a 3-mile Search Area and within 1 mile of the
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
List of Figures
Figure Cl 2012 Crop Lands, Dunn County, North Dakota C-38
Figure C2 Land Use Changes 1992-2001 and 2001-2006, Dunn County, North Dakota C-39
Figure C3 Population in Dunn County, North Dakota 1950-2010 C-40
Figure C4 Land Use Land Cover in 1992 and 2006, Dunn County, North Dakota Search Area C-41
Figure C5 2012 Crop Lands, Dunn County, North Dakota, Sampling Search Area C-42
Figure C6 Land Use Changes, 1992-2001 and 2001-2006, Dunn County, North Dakota, Search
Area C-43
Figure C7 Case Study Sample Location Map, Dunn County, North Dakota C-44
C-4
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
C.I. Land Use
This section presents descriptions of land uses in Dunn County as a whole, followed by descriptions of
land uses in and around the sampling points of this study. Building on information provided in the
"Study Area Background" section of this report, information on the use of agricultural land was obtained
from the Cropland Data Layer produced by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)( U.S.
Department of Agriculture 2012). The NASS data on agricultural land uses are based on satellite imagery
and an extensive agricultural ground checking of the imagery. Figure Cl shows land uses in Dunn County
in 2012. Table Cl shows the percentages of county land devoted to the largest agricultural uses.
Grassland herbaceous and spring wheat growing were the largest agricultural land uses, accounting for
approximately 59% and 12%, respectively, of land in the county.
Land use change data from the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Land Cover Database for 1992
and 2006 are not directly comparable (U.S. Geological Survey 2012). However, it was possible to
compare data from 1992 to data from 2001 and to then compare data from 2001 to that from 2006 to
identify land use changes in the 1992 to 2001 and 2001 to 2006 sub-periods (Multi-Resolution Land
Characteristics Consortium 2013). Figure C2 shows land use changes in Dunn County between 1992 and
2001 and between 2001 and 2006, respectively. Table C2 presents data on the changes in land use
during the same two sub-periods. It can be seen from the table that only a very small proportion of the
land in the county changed use during each sub-period.
The population of Dunn County (an indicator of the intensity of land use) has declined throughout the
period (1950-2010), although the rate of decline was much less between 2000 and 2010 (see Figure C3)
(U.S. Census Bureau 2013a, 2013b, 2013c). In 2011, the population density in Dunn County was
approximately 2 persons per square mile, as compared with approximately 10 persons per square mile
for the entire state (U.S. Census 2012a). In 2010, no land in Dunn County was taken up by urban areas
(another indicator of the intensity of land use), whereas approximately 0.3 percent of the land in the
entire state was taken up by urban areas (U.S. Census Bureau 2012b).
Employment is another broad indicator of land use in the county. Table C3 identifies the largest
industries, by employment, in the county. Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction (one of the
production industries) accounted for approximately 19% of employment in Dunn County.
C.2. Search Area
C.2.1. Land Use
Figure C4, which was created using data from the National Land Cover Database, presents land use maps
for the search area in 1992 and 2006. The search area encompasses a 3-mile search radius around the
sampling points in the county and was used to focus the analysis of land use patterns and the
environmental records searches. Table C4 presents data on land use in the search area in 1992 and
2006. Although the data for land use in 1992 and 2006 are not directly comparable because of changes
in data collection methodology, the data from the National Land Cover Database indicate that
grassland/herbaceous and row/cultivated crop land (i.e., land suitable for grazing or used for growing
crops) accounted for the majority of land use in the search area in both years.
C-5
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
C.2.2. Crop Land
Figure C5 shows land uses, including agricultural uses (crop lands), in the search area in 2012. Table C5
shows the percentages of land devoted to the largest agricultural uses in the search areagrassland,
herbaceous land, and spring wheat and other hay/non-alfalfa cropland.
C.2.3. Land Use Changes
Figure C6 and Table C6 show land use changes in the search area between 1992 and 2001 and between
2001 and 2006. The table shows that, in general, only a tiny proportion of the land in the search area
changed use during either sub-period.
C.3. Environmental Records Search
An environmental record search of the area surrounding the Franchuk well was performed by
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). EDR provides a service for searching publically available
databases and also provides data from their own proprietary databases. The database search included
reviews of several federal, state, and tribal environmental databases and proprietary EDR environmental
databases for the study area. The search identified the documented use, storage, or release of
hazardous materials or petroleum products (see Attachment 1). Record dates varied based on the
particular database from which the record was obtained. EDR began collecting a majority of the records
in 1991 from the standard databases (State Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act Site Lists [SHWS]; Landfills [LF];
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks [LUST]; Underground Storage Tanks [UST]; Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act [RCRA]; National Priority List [NPL]; Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Information System [CERCLIS]; etc.). However, some databases (e.g., spill
databases) may have records dating back to the 1980s.
The record search was based on a 3-mile-radius search area centered on the location of the Franchuk
well, which experienced a blowout in September 2010. Because of the large size of the study area, the
search area was chosen based on professional judgment.
The identified records included historically contaminated properties; businesses that use, generate,
transport, or dispose of hazardous materials or petroleum products in their operations; active
contaminated sites that are currently under assessment and/or remediation; sites with National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(SPDES) permits; and active and abandoned mines and landfills. All of the properties listed on the
Environmental Records Search Report were reviewed and screened based on the EDR record search
findings to determine whether they were potential candidate causes. The criteria used for the screening
included relevant environmental information (including, but not limited to, notices of violations, current
and historical use of the site, materials and wastes at the site, releases and/or spills) and distance from
the sampling points.
Sites that EDR could not automatically map because of poor or inadequate address information in the
searched databases were not included on the EDR Radius Map. However, EDR determined that, based
on the limited address information available, it was possible that these sites could be located within the
stated search radius (e.g., zip code listed within searched radius) and were, therefore, listed on the
C-6
-------
Appendix CBackground Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Environmental Records Search Report as "orphan" sites. (Orphan sites are those sites with poor
locational information in the databases and so may or may not exist inside the search radius.) All of the
orphan sites were screened to the extent possible based on limited information on those sites available
through additional searches of the databases listed above and information obtained through internet
searches (e.g., EPA website and state websites). Additionally, through a more extensive review of the
available records (including EnviroFacts, business listings, etc.), a location was determined for most
orphan sites and their approximate distance from the sampling points was measured on a map.
C.3.1. Oil and Gas Well Inventory
Well inventories were prepared for the same search area described above for the EDR reports. All oil
and gas wells identified within the search area were selected for review. Specific focus was placed on
wells within 1 mile of the sampling points. Information was obtained from desktop surveys performed
using searchable state agency databases. The oldest well spud date identified in this study was March
1980.
C.3.2. State Record Summary
The North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, Division of Oil and Gas, was contacted to find up-
to-date well records for wells within 1 mile of EPA study sampling locations. The information requested
included inspection and pollution-prevention visits, violations (if noted), and any enforcement that may
have resulted. Not all of the state's records were included in the state's electronic database. Access to
additional paper records can be obtained only by appointment with the particular state regional office.
C.4. Evaluation of Data for the Killdeer Site
C.4.1. Environmental Records Search Report Summary
A 3-mile-radius search area was established for the EDR database searches to capture the Dunn County
sampling points (see Figure C7). EDR identified 38 records of mapped sites within this search area. An
additional 102 orphan sites were identified during the searches. An attempt to locate these sites with
information available in the reports and through internet searches was made to help determine the
potential of these sites to be candidate causes. The evaluation of the sites is summarized in Table C7.
(Some of these records are for the same location, and they are listed together on the table).
The 140 records identified in the EDR reports include facilities with underground storage tanks (USTs)
and aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), RCRA-regulated facilities, numerous drilling sites, etc. Thirty-
seven of the incidents/records/sites have been retained as potential candidate causes (at 31 locations)
and are identified in the databases described below:
UST/LUST/AST Storage Tanks - Included sites listed in one of three databases: The
Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) database, which contains a list of registered ASTs from the
North Dakota Department of Health and Consolidated Laboratories' AST Data; the
Underground Storage Tank (UST) database, which contains registered USTs regulated under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (note: the data came from the
Department of Health's UST Data); and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)
C-7
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Incident Reports, which contain an inventory of reported leaking USTs (note: the data are
from the Department of Health's LUST List). A total of eight ASTs, and 11 USTs (for a total of
18 separate locations) were retained (sites with documented cleanup records were not
retained). Of these 18 sites, 16 are located within 0.5 miles of the sampling points, one is
less than 2 miles away, and one was retained because location information was insufficient.
Three of these sites are also listed in the Facility Index System (FINDS) database.
US Hist STAT Auto - This database is a select list of business directories of potential gas
station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR that may not show up
in current government record searches. A total of three US HIST Auto STAT sites were
retained as potential gas station/filling station/service station sites and were included as
potential contributors to groundwater quality impacts because of their proximity to the
nearest sampling point. One of these sites was also listed in the FINDS database.
Federal RCRA Generators List (RCRA-CESQG) - This database is EPA's information system on
sites that generate, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by
RCRA. Conditionally exempt small-quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100
kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste per month. One RCRA-CESQG site was retained because
of its proximity to the sampling points (less than 0.1 miles north of NDGW16) and recorded
violations. Hazardous waste generated at this location included barium, chromium, lead,
methyl ethyl ketone, certain spent non-halogenated solvents (F003 waste), certain spent
non-halogenated solvents (F005 waste), and ignitable waste. This site was also listed in the
FINDS database.
RCRA Non-Gen/No Longer Regulated (NLR) Site - This database includes information on
sites that generate, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by
RCRA. Non-generators do not presently generate hazardous waste and were not retained as
potential candidate causes, with one exception. This site was retained because of records
indicating compliance violations. The hazardous waste was not identified on the available
records.
Facility Index System (FINDS) - This database contains both facility information (North
Dakota Facility Profile [ND-FP]) and other sources of information from the EPA/National
Technical Information Service (NTIS). In addition to the five FINDS records for sites that also
have records in the databases discussed above (UST, US Hist STAT Auto, and RCRA-CESQG),
two FINDS records were retained because the sites were near the sampling points and the
information on facility activities and compliance was insufficient.
Tier 2 - This database records and stores information on Tier 2 locations. Tier 2 records may
include facilities or sites with recorded chemical storage. Six Tier 2 locations showed
gasoline, diesel, oil, motor oil, ethanol, or propane storage and were retained due to their
proximity to the sampling points (within 0.5 miles).
C.4.2. Oil and Gas Well Inventory Summary
The EPA Study sampling locations were compared with the inventory of wells identified in database files
from the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, Division of Oil and Gas (see Table C8).
C-8
-------
Appendix CBackground Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Thirty-five oil and gas wells are located within 3 miles of the Franchuk well. Of these wells, seven are
within 1 mile of the EPA Study sampling locations (see Table C9). The presence of these oil and gas wells
increases the probability of one or more of these features being a potential candidate cause for
groundwater contamination.
C.4.3. State Record Summary
Notice of Violations. Notices of violations (NOVs) were researched for all oil and gas wells within a 1-
mile radius of the EPA study site. Although no NOVs were identified by the North Dakota Department of
Mineral Resources (NDDMR), Division of Oil and Gas, NDDMR did provide incident notes regarding the
Franchuk 44-20SWH well. In addition, after subsequent inquiries, NDDMR also provided the following
additional information and stated that there were no NOVs on record for the Franchuk well because the
fine had been paid:
The Industrial Commission, on March 30, 2011, filed a complaint against Encore Operating, LP.
(Encore) and Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury) for violating North Dakota Administrative
Code(NDAC) Section 43-02-03-28 by failing to properly control subsurface pressure during the
completion operation, NDAC Section 43-02-03-49 by allowing oil to flow over and pool on the
surface of the land, NDAC Section 43-02-03-53 by allowing brine to flow over and pool on the
surface of the land, and NDAC Section 43-02-03-11 by failing to properly notify the Commission
when Denbury acquired Encore and the Franchuk 44-20SWH well in Dunn County, North
Dakota.
In the complaint, the Commission requested Encore and Denbury to pay a $237,500 fine and
$5,236 in costs and expenses incurred by the Commission.
In lieu of a formal hearing on the complaint, Denbury paid the $237,500 fine and $5,236 in costs
and expenses incurred by the Commission.
Therefore, this case was dismissed on December 7, 2011.
C.5. References
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. 2013. Frequently Asked Questions.
http://www.mrlc.gov/faqjc.php. Accessed October 25, 2013.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. Economic Planning and Coordination Division. Geography Area Series:
County Business Patterns: 2011. Dunn County, North Dakota.
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=BP_2011_OOAl&pr
odType=table. Accessed November 4, 2013.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2012a. Population Division. Table 3. Cumulative Estimates of Resident Population
Change for the United States, States, Counties, Puerto Rico, and Puerto Rico Municipios: April 1, 2010 to
July 1, 2011 (MAPS-EST2011-03). http://www.census.gov/popest/data/maps/2011/Countv-Densitv-
ll.html. Accessed October31, 2013.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2012b. PctUrbanRural_County.xls and PctUrbanRural_State.xls.
http://www2.census.gov/geo/ua. Accessed Novembers, 2013.
C-9
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
U.S. Census Bureau. 2013a. County Population Census Counts 1900-90.
http://www.census.gov/population/www/censusdata/cencounts/index.html. Accessed November 11,
2013.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2013b. DP-1 Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000. Census 2000
Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data. Dunn County, North Dakota.
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/isf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC 00 SF1 DP1&
prodType=table. Accessed November 11, 2013.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2013c. Community Facts. Census 2010 Total Population. Dunn County, North
Dakota, http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/isf/pages/community facts.xhtmlffnone. Accessed
November 11, 2013.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer.
Published crop-specific data layer. http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape. Accessed October 28,2013.
U.S. Geological Survey. 2012. The National Land Cover Database.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3020/fs2012-3020.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2013.
Washington County. 2005. Washington County Comprehensive Plan.
http://www.co.washington.pa.us/index.aspx?NID=172. Last accessed October 28, 2013.
C-10
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix C Tables
C-ll
-------
C-12
Table C-l Major Agricultural Land
Uses in Dunn County in
2012
Use % of County Land
Grassland herbaceous
Spring wheat
Other hay/non-alfalfa
Winter wheat
Corn
Sunflower
Alfalfa
59.2
12.0
5.2
2.0
1.4
1.3
0.8
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2012.
Table C-2
Changes in Land Use, 1992 to 2001 and 2001 to
2006, in Dunn County
Change in Land Use
No change
Change in land use
-to agriculture
- to grassland/shrub
-to wetlands
-to open water
- to emergent herbaceous wetlands
-to herbaceous
-to barren land
-to cultivated crops
% of County Land Area
1992 to 2001 2001 to 2006
98.4
1.6
0.9
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.1
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.2
Source US Geological Survey, 2012.
-------
C-13
Table C-3
Largest Industries, by Employment, in Dunn
County in 2011
Industry Title
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas
extraction
Retail trade
Construction
Transportation and warehousing
Accommodation and food services
Real estate and rental and leasing
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011.
Number of % of Total
Paid Paid
Employees Employees
238
164
117
73
63
18
18.8
12.9
9.2
5.8
5.0
1.4
Table C-4 Land Use in the Search Area in 1992
and 2006
1992 2006
Square % of Square % of
Land Use Miles Total Miles Total
Grassland/herbaceous
Row/cultivated crops
Fallow
Shrub/scrub
Developed
Pasture/hay
Open water
Deciduous forest
Woody wetlands
Barren
Total
14.5
5.7
4.2
2.8
0.8
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.3
51.2
20.1
14.7
10.0
2.8
0.9
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
20.6
5.5
0.0
0.4
1.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.3
72.8
19.6
0.0
1.3
4.8
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
100.0
Source: US Geological Survey, 2012.
Note: Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding.
-------
C-14
Table C-5 Major Agricultural Land
Uses in the Search area in
2012
% of County
Use Land
Grassland herbaceous
Spring wheat
Other hay/non-alfalfa
Corn
Alfalfa
Winter wheat
Fallow/idle cropland
Durum wheat
Sunflower
Oats
Barley
68.0
9.3
9.0
2.1
1.5
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.2
Source: US Department of Agriculture, 2012.
Table C-6
Changes in Land Use, 1992 to
2001 and 2001 to 2006, in the
Search Area
Change in Land Use
No change
Change in land use:
- to grassland/shrub
-to agriculture
-to cultivated crops
% of County Land Area
1992 to 2001 2001 to 2006
98.3
1.7
1.2
0.5
0.0
99.2
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
Source: US Geological Survey, 2012.
-------
C-15
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
AST
TIER 2
AST
ORPHAN; LUST,
UST
TIER 2
UST
RCRANonGen/
NLR, FINDS
FINDS
Benz Oil Company, Inc.
BOC - Sunrise [Sunrise Oil Company]
BENZ OIL COMPANY, INC. DBA GRAB'N GO,
INC
GNG- Bulk Plant
Prairie Implement Inc.
Project Safe Send
MITCHELLS OIL FIELD SERVICES - WATFORD
CITY
10688 Highway 200
10688 Highway 200
10690 N Dakota 200, Killdeer,
ND 58640
Hwy 22 & 200
10690 Highway 200
Junction 22 & 200
Latitude: 47.3604690,
Longitude: -102. 75758
NE of Junction of Highways 22
&200
1202 North Dakota SR 22
approx. 0.5
miles Wof
NDGW04
approx. 0.5
mi. W of
NDGW04
0.5 miles S of
NDGW15
0.5 miles S of
NDGW15
Less than 0.5
miles S of
NDGW15
Less than 0.5
miles S of
NDGW15
Less than 0.1
miles S of
NDGW15
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Unknown contents of active AST, no leaks
on record.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Chemical inventory submitted per Tier 2,
diesel fuel, gasoline, propane, and motor oil
storage. No leaks on record.
Site included due to proximity to site and
potential for contamination.
Unknown contents of active AST, no leaks
on record.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Inactive UST that contained petroleum.
Identified LUST, status: cleaned up
completed on 08/21/1993.
Chemical inventory submitted per Tier 2,
diesel fuel, gasoline, and ethanol, no
violations.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of UST, no leaks on
record. Inactive.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Presently non-generator of hazardous
waste, no violations found.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The type of facility listed could
not be determined. Based on an online map
search it appears that a commercial
business is listed at this address.
45 Federal
USGS Wells
1 Federal FRDS
Public Water
Supply Well
45 State Wells
No
oil/gas
wells
were
listed in
theEDR
report.
-------
C-16
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
FINDS,
UST
FINDS
FINDS,
RMPJIER2
UST
Schmidt Electric Shop
Dunn Spraying LLC
CHS, Inc. - Killdeer [Southwest Grain COOP]
Farmers Union Oil C-Store
1st Avenue East and Dakota
Street
10849 Highway 200
Latitude: 47. 35772
Longitude: -102.85431
303 Railroad Street
Latitude: 47. 36783
Longitude: -102.75353
335 Central Ave
Latitude: 47.36504
Longitude: -102.75207
0.5 miles NE
of NDGW16
2.26 miles W
of NDGW10
0.16 miles N
of NDGW16
0.33 miles N
of NDGW16
Yes
No
No
Yes
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is listed as
North Dakota Facility Profile (ND-FP) which
contains facility based, environmental
information for the State of North Dakota.
Inactive UST on-site. Unknown contents of
UST, no leaks on record.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is listed as ICIS.
The type of facility listed could not be
determined. Based on an online map
search it appears that a commercial
business is listed at this address.
No compliance records found. More than 2
miles from sample points.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS, RMP,
and ND TIER 2 databases. The RMP listing
notes Anhydrous Ammonia Storage. The
TIER 2 lists propane, anhydrous ammonia,
RT3 (herbicide), and Durango DMA
(herbicide).
No violations.
UST: unknown materials.
AST appear to contain diesel fuel, no leaks
on record, greater than 2 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
-------
C-17
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
FINDS
FINDS
FINDS
LUST, UST, EDR
US HIST AUTO
STAT
FINDS,
EDR US HIST
AUTO STAT
Farmers Union Oil C-Store
Killdeer Elementary School
Killdeer High School
AP Auto
Schmidtys Auto Service
335 Central Ave
Latitude: 47. 371855
Longitude: -102.754052
101 High St NW
101 High St NW
19 S Central Avenue
401 Central Ave N
<0.5 miles N
ofNDGW16
< 0.5 miles N
ofNDGW16
< 0.5 miles N
of NDGW16
<0.5 miles N
ofNDGW16
0.5 miles N of
NDGW16
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is listed as ND-
FP which contains facility based,
environmental information for the State of
North Dakota. No other information
available.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is listed as
NCES (National Center for Education
Statistics), the primary federal entity for
collecting and analyzing data related to
education in the United States and other
nations and the institute of education
sciences. No contamination concerns.
No violations cited.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is listed as
NCES and ICIS.
No compliance and violation information.
Unknown contents of LUST/UST, Site
Cleanup Completed 10/12/1989.
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is ND-FP as a
gasoline service station with USTs.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
-------
C-18
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
UST,
FINDS
AST
TIER 2
AST
TIER 2
UST
AST
Killdeer Public School Grounds
Farmers Union Oil Company of Killdeer
C-STORE
Farmers Union Oil Company of Killdeer
125 Railroad St Location
Benz Oil Company
Sax Motor Company of Killdeer
201 West High Street
335 Central Ave S
335 Central AveS
370 Central Ave S
125 Railroad Street SE
Railroad Street
500 Central SE
< 0.5 miles N
ofNDGW16
<0.5 miles N
ofNDGW16
< 0.5 miles N
of NDGW16
<0.5 miles N
of NDGW16
0.3 miles NE
of NDGW16
approx. 0.5
miles NE of
NDGW16
0.3 miles NE
of NDGW16
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Unknown contents of UST, no leaks on
record. Listed as Inactive.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of AST, listed as active,
no record of releases found.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
TIER 2 listing for diesel fuel and gasoline.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of AST, listed as active,
no record of releases found.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
TIER 2 listing for diesel fuel, motor oil, and
gasoline.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of UST, listed as inactive,
no releases found.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of AST, listed as active,
no record of releases found.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
-------
C-19
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
FINDS
&
ORPHAN; LUST,
UST
AST,
UST,
FINDS
AST
EDRUSHIST
AUTO STAT
RCRA, FINDS
EDRUSHIST
AUTO STAT
UST
ORPHAN; AIRS
Dean Bender Chevrolet Inc.
Farmers Union Oil Company of Killdeer
Consolidated Telcom
Tony's Auto Repair
Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing Inc.
Badlands Auto
Dunn County Airport Authority
Killdeer Station
500 SE Central, Killdeer, ND
125 Railroad Street SE
57 Main St East
4222ndAveSE
401 Main Street
345 Railroad StSE
Latitude: 47.3907880
Longitude: -102. 76769
Township 145 Range 95
Section 4
0.3 miles NE
of NDGW16
0.3 miles NE
of NDGW16
0.3 miles NE
ofNDGW16
0.4 miles NE
of NDGW16
0.2 miles NW
of NDGW16
0.4 miles NE
of NDGW16
1.8 miles NE
Nl
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
This site is listed in the Federal FINDS
database. The Environmental
Interest/Information System is ND-FD listed
as a motor vehicle dealer (new and used)
with inactive USTs of unknown contents.
Cleanup completed on 1/1/2000.
Unknown contents of AST and UST, listed as
active, no record of releases found. ND-FD
lists it as gasoline service station.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of AST, listed as active,
no record of releases found.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Historical auto repair facility. No other
information.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Presently non-generator of hazardous, no
violations found, waste codes D001, F001,
F003. EnviroFacts shows no violations.
Historical auto repair facility. No other
information.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Unknown contents of UST, no leaks on
record.
Permitted facility for emissions.
-------
C-20
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; HIST
FITS,
ORPHAN; FITS, &
ORPHAN; FINDS
ORPHAN; FINDS
ORPHAN; RCRA-
CESQG
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; FINDS
Killdeer WTP
Killdeer Landfill
Petro-Hunt Lie - Little Knife Gas
MBI-HausauerSWD22-2
Killdeer Compressor Station
Lone Butte Compressor Station
ND DOT Maintenance Facility - Killdeer
PO BOX 515
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.402062
Longitude: -102.622182
258119th Avenue SW
Killdeer, ND 58640
SE 1/4, SEC 2,2 T145N, R93W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 362215
Longitude: -102.510838
NE 1/4 SECTION 28, T146N,
R95W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.443
Longitude: -102.787
S 1/2 SECTION 13, T147N,
R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.547
Longitude: -103.089
40 HWY 22
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.364583
Longitude: -102.819444
0.4 miles N of
NDGW16
6.7 miles ENE
of NDGW16
>10 miles W
>10 miles E
approx. 5.5
miles N
18.6 miles
NW
0.7 NW of
NDGW05
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Listed in FITTS. Envirofacts identifies site in
the NCDB (National Compliance Data Base)
which supports implementation of the
FIFRA and TSCA. The system tracks
inspections in regions and states with
cooperative agreements, enforcement
actions, and settlements. No record of
violations found in Envirofacts. Not a
suspected source of contamination.
FINDS identifies the facility as a landfill listed
in the Emission Inventory System (EIS). NO
violations noted. Site more than 6 miles
away from sampling locations, based on
coordinates in Envirofacts.
Small quantity generator, waste codes
D001, D002, D008, D009 identified, no
violations noted.
Salt water disposal well.
Greater than 10 miles from nearest
sampling point.
Compressor station for natural gas pipeline,
storage tanks on site, no violations noted,
greater than 5 miles from nearest sampling
point.
Compressor station for natural gas pipeline,
storage tanks on site, no violations noted,
greater than 15 miles from nearest
sampling point.
North Dakota State Department of
Transportation Maintenance Facility, no
violations noted.
-------
C-21
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; UST
ORPHAN; LUST,
UST
ORPHAN; UST
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ND DOT Killdeer (North Dakota DOT)
PLAINS / BRIDGER KILLDEER STATION
Plains Marketing Killdeer Truck Station
Sunrise Oil Company
S Curves Auto And Repair
North Dakota State Dept Of Transportation
Duininck Portable Plant
Mid State Oilfield Supply
400 HWY 22
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.3587
Longitude: -102.7570
41 Highway 22 North
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.40892
Longitude: -102.79405
S4 T145N R95W, 41 HIGHWAY
22
Latitude: 47.40892
Longitude: -102.79406
HWY 22 & 200
HIGHWAY 22 SOUTH
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.9093689
Longitude: -97.631721
398 HWY 22 S
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.3647169
Longitude: -102.75433
HWY 22
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.433693
Longitude: -102.804668
196HWY22N
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.386886
Longitude: -102.759261
0.3 miles S of
NDGW15
3.5 miles N of
NDGW15
3.5 miles N of
NDGW15
approx. 0.5
mi.Sof
NDGW15
Nl
Coordinates
are incorrect
(Larimore ND
> 700 mi)
less than 0.1
miles S of
NDGW16
5.3 miles N
0.4 miles N of
NDGW16
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
North Dakota State Department of
Transportation, storage of tar oil, no
violations noted.
Compressor station for natural gas pipeline,
storage tanks on site, no violations noted,
greater than 3 miles from nearest sampling
point.
The TIER 2 information for this entry
identifies aluminum and crude oil storage.
Location is a truck stop. Active UST.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Inactive UST that contained petroleum.
Identified leaking UST, status; cleaned up as
of 05/11/1994.
Inactive UST.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to proximity to site and potential for
contamination.
Storage of fuel oil, diesel, and asphalt
cement at this location, no violations noted,
greater than 5 miles from nearest sampling
location.
Storage of paint at this location, no
violations noted.
-------
C-22
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; RCRA
NonGen/NLR
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; RCRA-
CESQG
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; AST
Denbury Franchuk 44-20NWH
Moc-lvan Hecker 41-6h #2
Moc- Edward Darwin 14-35h
Moc - Dawn Kupper 31-15h
Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Co - CONNOLLY
TANK SITE
Bulk Plant
Dunn County Road Dept.
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.358542
Longitude: -102.804835
6 MILES WEST, 2 MILES SOUTH
& 1 MILE EAST OF
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.328014
Longitude: -102.889478
6 MILES WEST, 2 MILES SOUTH
& 1 MILE EAST OF
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 331272
Longitude: -102.881653
7 MILES NORTH & 0.5 MILES
WEST OF KILLDEER
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.47243
Longitude: -102.76431
148 97TH AVE NW
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 391628
Longitude: -102.609766
370 S CENTRAL AVE
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 3701
Longitude: -102.7523
300 CENTRAL AVE
KILLDEER, ND 58640
0 miles
4.5 miles SW
4.0 miles SW
8.3 miles N
> 6 miles E of
NDGW15
0.3 miles NE
ofNDGW16
0.3 miles NE
of NDGW16
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Listed as presently non-generator of
hazardous waste (waste not specified). Non-
violation status on 10/03/2012 Compliance
Evaluation Inspection.
Well Location, Storage of diesel, bentonite,
barite, produced water, and crude oil at this
location, greater than 4 miles from nearest
sampling location.
Well Location, Storage of diesel, bentonite,
barite, produced water, and crude oil at this
location, approximately 4 miles from
nearest sampling location.
Well Location, Storage of diesel, bentonite,
barite, produced water, and crude oil at this
location, greater than 8 miles from nearest
sampling location.
Pipeline transportation of crude oil. Small
quantity generator, waste codes D001 and
D018 identified, no violations noted.
Storage of diesel, gasoline, and propane at
this location. Site included as a potential
candidate cause due to proximity to site and
potential for contamination.
Two active ASTs with unknown contents, no
other information available.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due unknown location and potential for
contamination.
-------
C-23
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; NPDES
&
ORPHAN; FINDS
ORPHAN; UST
ORPHAN; UST
ORPHAN; UST
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
Killdeer City Of
Killdeer Fiber Hut US West
Bishop Construction Building
North Rocky Mt. Area Field Office
Br - Bakken Area - Patton 31-lh
Br - Bakken Area - Newry 24-26h
Br - Bakken Area - Gorhman 24-31mb
Br - Bakken Area -Scott 31-36mbh
Br - Bakken Area - Scott 21-36mbh
Highway 22 and High Street
KILLDEER, ND 58640
JCT. HWY 85 & 200
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.3670370
Longitude: -102.74833
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.414986
Longitude: -102.596354
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.255015
Longitude: -102.788508
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.255100
Longitude: -102. 793695
0.4 miles N of
NDGW16
>18 miles W
of NDGW10
0.2 miles NE
of NDGW16
Nl
10.6 miles NE
12.5 miles SW
>6 miles NE
7.2 miles S
7.2 miles S
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Wastewater treatment facility, NPDES
permit, no violations noted.
Inactive UST that contained petroleum, no
violations noted.
Inactive UST, no other information available.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to unknown location and potential for
contamination.
Inactive UST.
Site included as a potential candidate cause
due to unknown location and potential for
contamination.
Well Location, Storage of crude oil and
diesel at this location, greater than 10 miles
from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, further than 12 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 7 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 7 miles from
nearest sampling point.
-------
C-24
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
Br - Bakken Area - Gorhman 14-31TF
Br - Bakken Area - Elizabeth Stroh
Br - Bakken Area - Cecilia Stroh 3
Br - Bakken Area - Berlin 34-14h
Br - Bakken Area - Bath ll-35h
Br - Bakken Area - Rifle Falls 21-
Br - Bakken Area - Lincoln Hill 41
Br - Bakken Area - Audubon 41-27h
Br - Bakken Area - Intervale 41-35
KILLDEER, ND 58640
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 21311472
Longitude: -102. 8931694
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 21311472
Longitude: -102. 8929883
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 19836
Longitude: -102.93151
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 16817778
Longitude: -102.9433578
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 26981
Longitude: -102.66173
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.385703
Longitude: -102.699061
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.530000
Longitude: -102.760000
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 25523
Longitude: -102.81529
> 6 miles NE
10.9 miles SW
10.9 miles SW
12.7 miles SW
14.7 miles SW
9.2 miles SE
2 miles N
12 miles N
7.2 miles S
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, further than 6 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, further than 10 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 10 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 12 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 14 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 9 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 2 miles from
nearest sampling location.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 12 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location, greater than 7 miles from
nearest sampling point.
-------
C-25
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; RCRA
NonGen/NLR,
FINDS
Br - Bakken Area - Goldpoint 41-25
Br - Bakken Area - Tilton 34-7h
Br - Bakken Area - Manchester 34-9
Br - Bakken Area - Keene 14-35h
Br - Bakken Area - Franklin 24-36h
Br - Bakken Area - Concord 24-10h
Br - Bakken Area - Jorgenson Feder
MOC-TKupperUsa34-llh
Hwy 200
Koch Pipeline Co - Killdeer Sta
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.35640278
Longitude: -102.7186056
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.559442
Longitude: -103. 157308
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.559844
Longitude: -103.041319
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.502683
Longitude: -103.008744
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.502756
Longitude: -102.986850
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.560664
Longitude: -103.029983
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.661033
Longitude: -103.076517
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.475228
Longitude: -102. 746297
6 miles W of Killdeer
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.372600
Longitude: -102.890800
5 Ml NE OF KILLDEER
KILLDEER, ND 58640
1.6 miles SE
ofNDGW16
>20 miles NE
17.8 miles
NW
14.2 miles
NW
>10 miles NE
17.5 miles
NW
24.5 miles
NW
7.5 miles N
3.9 miles W of
NDGW10
>5 mi NE of
NDGW16
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery, drill rig, and possible well
location, Storage of crude oil and diesel at
this location.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, further than 20 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 17 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 14 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 12 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 17 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 24 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Well Location, Storage of diesel, bentonite,
barite, produced water, and crude oil at this
location, greater than 7 miles from the
nearest sampling location.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 3 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Presently non-generator of hazardous
waste, no violations found, waste code
D018 identified. No violations.
-------
C-26
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; RCRA
NonGen/NLR,
FINDS
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; RCRA-
CESQG, FINDS
CIT - Lone Butte Field - Lone Butte
AT&T Corp -Killdeer
CIT - Lone Butte Field - Carus B 1
CIT - Lone Butte Field - Bob Creek
Con - Haag 1X-21H
CON - Chretien 1-36H
CON-Champlainl-36H
Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing Inc.
NW NE SEC. 19, T147N, R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
12.7 Ml NW
KILLDEER, ND 58640
SW NW SEC. 20, T147N, R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 8992
Longitude: -103.1248
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.5403
Longitude: -103.0957
S021-T144N-R099W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.2707
Longitude: -103. 2362
S031-T142N-R101W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
S36-T143N-R101W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
233 Rodeo Dr, Killdeer, ND
58640
41 miles N
>5 miles NW
>20 miles
NW
18.5 miles
NW
> 23 miles SW
> 20 miles SW
> 20 miles SW
>0.1 miles N
ofNDGW16
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 40 miles from nearest
sampling location.
Presently non-generator of hazardous
waste, no violations found, waste codes
DOOO and D002 identified. No violations.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 20 miles from nearest
sampling location.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 18 miles from nearest
sampling location.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, greater than 20 miles from
nearest sampling point. Further than 20
miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, further than 20 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil at
this location, further than 20 miles from
nearest sampling point.
Small quantity generator, waste codes
D001, D005, D007, D008, D035, F003, and
F005 identified, several violations for not
reporting RCRA hazardous waste. In the 5
years of records there were 2 Inspections
with violations or compliance issues . No
other information found.
-------
C-27
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
CIT - Little Knife Field - Kukla A-l
CIT - Lone Butte Field - Carus Uni
CON -Gale 1-32H
CON - Federal Jorgenson 14-5H
CON - Dvirnak 14-6H
CON- Dennis 44-8H
CON- Carus 24-28h
CON-Candeell-9H
CON-Bridger44-14H
SESESEC. 20,T144N, R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.4525
Longitude: -103.6556
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.9105
Longitude: -103. 141
KILLDEER, ND 5864
Latitude: 47. 516133
Longitude: -102.935219
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.660943
Longitude: -103.076287
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.488837
Longitude: -102.84082
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.560739
Longitude: -102. 9302
SEC. 021-T147N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 517847
Longitude: -102. 922872
SEC. 009-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
SEC. 014-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.459824
Longitude: -102.868047
>15 miles SW
41 miles NW
> 12 miles
NW
> 20 miles
NW
>9 miles N
> 15 miles
NW
>12 miles
NW
>10 miles
NW
>7 miles NW
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
approximately 15 miles from nearest
sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
further than 40 miles from nearest sampling
location.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
10 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
20 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
9 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
15 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
12 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
45 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
7 miles from nearest sampling point.
-------
C-28
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
CON-Veigell-9H
CON - State Weydahl 44-36H 76
CON- State Dolezal44-lh
CON-Skachenkol-31H
CON - Ryden 21-24H
CON - Rodney 1-29H
CON - Pletan 1-18H
CON-Oakdale 11-12H
CON - Mountain Gap 31-10H
SEC. 009-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.486958
Longitude: -102.9213111
SEC. 001-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.503047
Longitude: -102. 845292
SEC. 036-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.401854
Longitude: -102.848231
SEC. 031-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.41625
Longitude: -102.8384
SEC. 024-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.457675
Longitude: -102.854867
SEC. 029-T147N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 517369
Longitude: -102.934558
SEC. 018-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.472908
Longitude: -102.838331
SEC. 012-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.48665
Longitude: -102.859661
SEC. 010-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.487091
Longitude: -102.894101
> 10 miles
NW
>10 miles N
>3milesNW
>4 miles NW
>7 miles NW
> 10 miles
NW
> 8 miles N
> 9 miles N
>9milesNW
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
10 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
10 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, further than
3 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
4 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
7 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
10 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
8 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
9 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
9 miles from nearest sampling point.
-------
C-29
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
CON - Morris 1-23H
CON - Mittelstadt 1-20H
CON- Kelly 44-2H
CON - Kelling 1-4H
CON -Jensen 1-5H
CON - Brandvik 14-24H
CON-Bonneville41-23H
CON - Bice 1-29H
CON - Bang 1-33H
SEC. 023-T147N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.543658
Longitude: -102.871522
SEC. 020-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.445053
Longitude: -102.806206
SEC. 002-T145N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.487061
Longitude: -102.965975
SEC. 004-T145N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
SEC. 005-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.488444
Longitude: -102.819811
SEC. 024-T147N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 532253
Longitude: -102.863714
SEC. 023-T146N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.458095
Longitude: -102.868834
SEC. 029-T146N-R095W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.443956
Longitude: -102.806211
SEC. 033-T147N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 5159
Longitude: -102.923706
> 13 miles N
> 5 miles N
> 11 miles
NW
>5 miles NW
> 8 miles N
12. 3 miles N
>7 miles NW
> 5 miles N
> 10 miles
NW
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
13 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
5 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
11 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
5 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
8 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
12 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
7 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
5 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
12 miles from nearest sampling point.
-------
C-30
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; RCRA
NonGen/NLR,
FINDS
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; TIER 2
ORPHAN; CERCLIS
CON- Sloan 1-17H
CON -Dolezal 1-18
MBI - Kohn SWD 3 1
Western Area Power Admin - Killdeer
Substation
CIT - Little Knife Field - Kudrna
CIT - Jim's Creek Field - Skachend
CIT -Little Knife Field - Loh A
Dunn County Erionite
SEC. 017-T145N-R096W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 37277
Longitude: -102.944588
SEC. 018-T145N-R097W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.374022
Longitude: -103.08425
10310 HWY 200, SOUTH SIDE
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 357561
Longitude: -102.739314
SW SW SEC. 29, T144N, R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 3794598
Longitude: -103.0732426
NE SW SEC. 30, T146N, R95W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
SW SW SEC. 30, T144N, R97W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47.4294
Longitude: -103.051
SW SECTION 25, TOWNSHP
146 N, RANGE 96W
KILLDEER, ND 58640
>6 miles W
> 13 miles W
> 15 miles S
1 mile Eof
NDGW15
> 12 miles W
> 8 miles NW
> 10 miles SW
>30 miles N
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
6 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of "produced
hydrocarbons" at this location, greater than
13 miles from nearest sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of produced
water at this location, greater than 15 miles
from nearest sampling point.
Presently non-generator of hazardous waste
(waste not specified). No violations.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 12 miles from nearest
sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 11 miles from nearest
sampling point.
Tank battery location, Storage of crude oil
and hydrogen sulfide at this location,
greater than 10 miles from nearest
sampling point.
Removal Only Site, Gravel pit mining has
caused a release of fibrous erionite to
county roads and the surrounding
environment; Removal Assessment
Completed 11/01/10.
-------
C-31
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Nearest Potential Candidate Cause Groundwater Oil/Gas
Database Name of Facility (Location) Address of Facility Sample Point Yes/No Justification Wells Wells
ORPHAN; FITS,
HIST FITS, FINDS
ORPHAN; FITS,
HIST FITS, FINDS
ORPHAN; RCRA
NonGen/NLR,
FINDS
Killdeer Ranch Supply & Recycling
Killdeer Sen Dist
Eott Energy - Killdeer Truck Shop
400 THIRD AVENUE EAST
KILLDEER, ND 58640
Latitude: 47. 34999
Longitude: -102.33304
101 High Street Northwest
Killdeer, ND 58640
1 Ml WJCT22&200
KILLDEER, ND 58640
0.4 miles NE
of NDGW16
2.5 miles NE
1 mile Eof
NDGW14
No
No
No
PCB inspection, no violations noted.
Asbestos inspection, no violations noted.
Presently non-generator of hazardous
waste, no violations found, waste codes
D001 and D018 identified.
Primary Source: Environmental records search report by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) / EDR Inquiry Number: 3589271.2s
EDR Search Radius: 3 miles with EDR Center of Search: Latitude 47.3585000 - 47° 21' 30.60", Longitude 102.8050000 - 102° 48' 18.00"
Other Sources: https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/
http://www.ndhealth.gov/WM/UndergroundStoragetankProgram/
Notes:
ORPHAN SITE: A site of potential environmental interest that appear in the records search but due to incomplete location information (i.e., address and coordinates) is unmappable and not included in the records search report
Key:
AST = Above ground storage tank. NI = No information.
DOT = Department of Transportation. NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
E = East. PCB = Polychnorinated biphenyl.
ENE = East-northeast. S = South.
FRDS = Federal Reporting Data System. SE = Southeast.
mi= Mile. SW = Southwest.
N = North. USGS = United States Geological Survey.
ND = North Dakota. UST = Underground storage tank.
NE= Northeast. W= West.
Databases:
AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility Listing.
AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Listing. The data come from the Department of Health & Consolidated Laboratories' AST Data (Facility & Owner Address of the Tanks Currently Recorded in North Dakota).
FINDS: Facility Index System of the U.S. EPA/NTIS database that contains both facility information and "pointers" to other sources of information that contain more detail. It includes: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS);
Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket
used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA
Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS; and TSCA.
FTTS: FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Tracking System. FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to
FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing: A complete administrative case listing from the FTTS for all 10 EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB)
that NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA and TSCA. Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was
decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing: A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information
was obtained from the NCDB.
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System. ICIS provides a database that, when complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance information across most of EPA's programs.
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Health's LUST List.
-------
Table C-7 Environmental Database Review Summary
Killdeer, Dunn County North Dakota
Distance from
Potential Candidate Cause
Database Name of Facility (Location)
Address of Facility
Sample Point Yes/No Justification
C-32
Groundwater Oil/Gas
Wells Wells
NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Listing
RCRAInfo: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. The
database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the RCRA.
RCRA-CESQG: Federal RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator List.
RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRAInfo listings of RCRA Non-Generators /No longer regulated. Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.
RMP: List of facilities with Risk Management Programs. The RMP Rule, which was built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk
Management Program.
TIER 2: Listing of Tier 2 information.
US Hist Auto Stat: EDR's database of listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in
EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto
service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data
about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the
Department of Health's UST Data (Facility & Owner Address of the Tanks Currently Recorded in North Dakota).
Waste Code D001 - Ignitable hazardous wastes are those wastes which have a flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit as determined by a Pensky-Martens closed cup flash point tester.
Waste Code D002 - A waste which has a pH of less than 2 or greater than 12.5 is considered to be a corrosive hazardous waste.
Waste Code D005 - Barium
Waste Code D007 - Chromium.
Waste Code D008 - Lead.
Waste Code D009 - Mercury.
Waste Code D018 - Benzene.
Waste Code D035 - Methyl ethyl ketone.
Waste Code F003 - The following spent non-halogenated solvents: Xylene, acetone, ethyl acetate, ethyl benzene, ethyl ether, methyl isobutyl ketone, n-butyl alcohol, cyclohexanone, and methanol; all spent solvent mixtures/blends containing,
before use, only the above spent non-halogenated solvents; and all spent solvent mixtures/blends containing, before use, one or more of the above non-halogenated solvents, and, a total of 10 percent or more (by volume) of one or more of those
solvents listed inFOOl, F002, F004, and F005; and still bottoms from the recovery of these spent solvents and spent solvent mixtures.
Waste Code F005 - The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine, benzene, 2-ethoxyethanol, and 2-nitropropane; all spent solvent mixtures/blends containing, before use, a total of
ten percent or more (by volume) of one or more of the above nonhalogenated solvents or those solvents listed inFOOl, F002, or F004; and still bottoms from the recovery of these spent solvents and spent solvent mixtures.
-------
C-33
Table C-8 Well Inventory Summary, Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Site. Dunn County. North Dakota
File
Number API Number
Operator
Well Name
Field Name Quarter Section Township Range Latitude
Longitude
Status
18537
17702
17669
16740
18638
18769
23520
23519
21584
21586
16678
17713
21583
18637
19138
33-025-01015-
00-00
33-025-00841-
00-00
33-025-00837-
00-00
33-025-00651-
00-00
33-025-01033-
00-00
33-025-01060-
00-00
33-025-01831-
00-00
33-025-01830-
00-00
33-025-01483-
00-00
33-025-01485-
00-00
33-025-00637-
00-00
33-025-00845-
00-00
33-025-01482-
00-00
33-025-01032-
00-00
33-025-01121-
00-00
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Denbury Onshore,
LLC
Denbury Onshore,
LLC
XTO Energy Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
Marathon Oil
Company
Continental
Resources, Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
Roadrunner 1-22H
Jack 14-9H
Rogne 44-27H
Lazorenko 11-31H
Franchuk 44-20NWH
Roadrunner 1-15H
Jack 3-9H
Jack 4-9H
Clover 3-10H
Clover 2-10H
Truchan 11X-33H
State Lazorenko 34-
36H
Roadrunner 3-15H
Franchuk 44-20SWH
Franchuk 34-19SWH
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Wildcat
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
SWSW
SESW
SESE
LOT1
SESE
NWNW
SESE
SESE
NENW
NENW
NWNW
SWSE
NENW
SESE
SWSE
22
9
27
31
20
15
9
9
15
15
33
36
15
20
19
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
96
95
95
95
47.3582814
47.3872974
47.3437151
47.3423247
47.3585428
47.3852751
47.3873564
47.3872911
47.3842742
47.3842755
47.3423449
47.3303624
47.3842735
47.3585044
47.3588156
-102.7740982
-102.7952458
-102.7600234
-102.8419889
-102.8048359
-102.7764828
-102.7840249
-102.7841799
-102.7692591
-102.7688954
-102.7952824
-102.8500630
-102.7694409
-102.8049411
-102.8286698
PNC
A
PNC
PNC
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
-------
C-34
Table C-8 Well Inventory Summary, Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Site. Dunn County. North Dakota
File
Number API Number
Operator
Well Name
Field Name Quarter Section Township Range Latitude
Longitude
Status
16765
21585
16763
8374
16766
19137
9612
21424
7584
21425
20746
25299
25300
10542
21484
33-025-00663-
00-00
33-025-01484-
00-00
33-025-00661-
00-00
33-025-00199-
00-00
33-025-00664-
00-00
33-025-01120-
00-00
33-025-00338-
00-00
33-025-01453-
00-00
33-025-00164-
00-00
33-025-01454-
00-00
33-025-01356-
00-00
33-025-02107-
00-00
33-025-02108-
00-00
33-025-00384-
00-00
33-025-01458-
00-00
XTO Energy Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Encore Operating,
LP.
Adobe Resources
Corp.
XTO Energy Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
Crawford
Exploration Co.
XTO Energy Inc.
Amoco Production
Co.
XTO Energy Inc.
Continental
Resources, Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
XTO Energy Inc.
Cities Service Oil &
Gas Corp.
Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas
Company LP
Rogne 11-35H
Roadrunner 2-15H
Lazorenko 44-30H
Federal Killdeer 41-4
Rogne 44-34H
Franchuk 34-19NWH
Kulish 1
Johnson 43-27WNH
Roshau 1
Johnson 43-27ENH
Jack 2-9H
Franchuk 24X-20A
Franchuk 24X-20E
State Of North Dakota
B-l
Bartlett 31-16TFH
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Wildcat
Wildcat
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Wildcat
Murphy
Creek
Wildcat
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Wildcat
Murphy
Creek
NWNW
NENW
SESE
NENE
SESE
SWSE
NWSW
NESE
NENW
NESE
SWSW
SESW
SESW
CNE
NWNE
35
15
30
4
34
19
2
27
8
27
9
20
20
30
16
145
145
145
144
145
145
144
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
95
95
95
96
95
95
96
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
47.3422865
47.3842748
47.3439253
47.3269740
47.3294486
47.3588672
47.3190440
47.3475106
47.3991300
47.3475107
47.3869499
47.3590698
47.3591520
47.3540910
47.3856369
-102.7567995
-102.7690773
-102.8233010
-102.8455970
-102.7593999
-102.8285647
-102.8182180
-102.7617258
-102.8139110
-102.7615440
-102.7984068
-102.8151383
-102.8151383
-102.8273630
-102.7897082
A
A
PNC
DRY
A
A
PNC
A
DRY
A
A
Confidential
Confidential
DRY
A
-------
C-35
Table C-8 Well Inventory Summary, Killdeer Retrospective Case Study Site. Dunn County. North Dakota
File
Number API Number
Operator
Well Name
Field Name Quarter Section Township Range Latitude
Longitude
Status
22987
21486
21485
18074
21487
33-025-01732-
00-00
33-025-01460-
00-00
33-025-01459-
00-00
33-025-00922-
00-00
33-025-01461-
00-00
Continental
Resources, Inc.
Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas
Company LP
Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas
Company LP
Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas
Company LP
Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas
Company LP
Doe 34-23NH
Bartlett 21-16TFH
Bartlett 21-16MBH
Bartlet 21-16H
Bartlett 11-16TFH
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
Murphy
Creek
SWSE
NENW
NENW
NENW
NWNW
23
16
16
16
16
145
145
145
145
145
95
95
95
95
95
47.3603657
47.3856380
47.3856375
47.3856519
47.3856600
-102.7425771
-102.7900992
-102.7899174
-102.7950243
-102.7979334
A
A
A
A
A
Key:
API = American Petroleum Institute.
A= Active well.
PNC = Permit now canceled.
-------
C-36
Table C-9 Number of Oil and Gas Wells within a 3 -mile Search Area and
within 1 mile of the EPA Sampling Points
Oil and Gas Wells
Search Area Total Number of within 1 Mile of EPA
Search Area Name Radius (miles) EPA Samples Oil and Gas Wells Sampling Points
Dunn County
Franchuk Well
44-20 SWH
3
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW14
35
7
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix C Figures
C-37
-------
C-38
10
Miles
Crop Lands
Alfalfa
Fallow/Idle Cropland
M Flaxseed
Q^ Lentils
Buckwheat 0C Millet
Canola * Mustard
Clover/Wildflowers 1 % Oat!
Corn % 0therCr°P!
Dry Beans
Durum Wheat
S Potatoes 94^
Radishes flth ,
Safflower
Sorghum
Soybeans
Spring Wheat
Sugarbeets
Other Hay/Non Alfalfa Sunflower
Peas Triticale
Winter Wheat
Other Lands
Open Water
Developed
Barren
Forest
Shrubland
Grassland Herbaceous
Wetlands
^ ^Search Area EPA HF Sampling Locations
[^j-l Municipal Boundaries
Figure C-1
2012 Crop Lands
Dunn County, North Dakota
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
Source: Land Use, USDA; Municipalities, ESRI; Sample Locations, EPA ORD
-------
C-39
2001-2006
1992-
2001
n
\ I
NORTH DAKOTA I
f \
\
Land Use Change
To Open Water
To Barren
Evergreen Forest
To Grassland/Shrub \ J Search Area
To Agriculture L-T H Municipal Boundaries
To Wetlands
EPA HF Sampling Locations
Figure C-2
Land Use Changes
1992-2001 and 2001-2006
Dunn County, North Dakota
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Stud)
Source: Landuse, USGS National Land Cover Database; Municipalities, ESRI; Sampling Locations, EPA ORD
-------
C-40
8,000
1,000
0
Figure C3: Population in Dunn County, North Dakota
1950-2010
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
-------
C-41
V !
1992
L -tv .- A. Ti !
2006-r
NORTH DAKOTA
;" Bismarck
Land Use Shurbland EPA HF Sampling Locations
Open Water Grassland/Herbaceous ^ ^ Search Area
Developed Agriculture [f~VJ Municipal Boundaries
Barren Ag Wetlands
^^
Forest
Source: Landuse, USGS National Land Cover Database; Municipalities, ESRI; Sampling Locations, EPAORD _
Figure C-4
Land Use/Land Cover
1992 and 200
Dunn County, North Dakota
Franchuk Well Search Area
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
-------
C-42
Crop Lands
Alfalfa
£ Barley
Buckwheat
Canola
Clover/Wildflowers
Corn
^ Durum Wheat
Source: Land Use,
s
*
s
Fallow/Idle Cropland
Flaxseed
Millet
Mustard
Oats
Other Hay/Non Alfalfa
Safflower Other Lands
Sorghum ^ Open Water
> Soybeans f£ Devdoped
Spring Wheat Barren
Sunflower |
, WinterWheat
^7 T^Search Area
f^j-l Municipal Boundaries
9 EPA HF Sampling Locations
Forest
Shrubland
Grassland Herbaceous
Wetlands
USDA; Municipalities, ESRI; Sample Locations: EPA ORD
Potatoes
Figure C-5
2012 Crop Lands
Dunn County, North Dakota
Franchuk Well Search Area
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
-------
C-43
1992-2001
2001-2006
NORTH DAKOTA
Bismarck
Land Use Change
To Open Water
To Barren
Evergreen Forest
To Grassland/Shrub
To Agriculture
To Wetlands
EPA HF Sampling Locations
Search Area
Municipal Boundaries
Source: Landuse: USGS National Land Cover Database (1992,2006), Municipalities: ESRI, Sampling Locations: US EPA ORD
Figure C-6
Land Use Changes
1992-2001 and 2001-200i
Dunn County, North Dakota
Franchuk Well Search Area
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
-------
C-44
Franchuk Well 44-20 SWH
(3-mile radius)
/GW03
'-x\V/ /
GW08 09--7
Search Area
O EPA HF Sampling Locations
Well (Type Confidential)
- Well (Oil & Gas)
Source: Basemap, ESRI; Sample Locations, EPA ORD;
Wells- North Dakota Dept of Natural Resources Oil and Gas Division
Figure C-7
EPA HF Sampling Location Map
Dunn County, North Dakota
EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study
-------
Appendix C Background Data, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Attachment 1 EDR Record Search
C-45
-------
C-46
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: 202-564-7333
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246
EPA Region 10
Telephone 206-553-8665
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Telephone: 202-564-4267
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11728/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC3602489.16S Page GR-1
-------
C-47
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 02/04/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: 703-412-9810
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2012 Telephone: 703-603-8704
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2013
Number of Days to Update: 72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined
no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates
this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.
This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,
based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: 703-412-9810
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-2
-------
C-48
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2013 Telephone: 800-424-9346
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2013 Telephone: 800-438-2474
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2013 Telephone: 800-438-2474
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2013 Telephone: 800-438-2474
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2013 Telephone: 800-438-2474
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC3602489.16S Page GR-3
-------
C-49
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 12/19/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2012 Telephone: 703-603-0695
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 12/19/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2012 Telephone: 703-603-0695
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006 Telephone: 843-820-7326
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/03/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/17/2013 Telephone: 202-267-2180
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
SHWS: Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act Site List
The Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act Site List includes sites listed on PA Priority List, sites delisted from PA Priority
List, Interim Response Completed sites, and Sites Being Studied or Response Being Planned.
Date of Government Version: 01/08/2013 Source: Department Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2013 Telephone: 717-783-7816
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2013
Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC3602489.16S Page GR-4
-------
C-50
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HSCA: HSCA Remedial Sites Listing
A list of remedial sites on the PA Priority List. This is the PA state equivalent of the federal NPL superfund
list.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2013 Telephone: 717-783-7816
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: Operating Facilities
The listing includes Municipal Waste Landfills, Construction/Demolition Waste Landfills and Waste-to-Energy Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 02/26/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Telephone: 717-787-7564
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2013
Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Storage Tank Release Sites
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground
storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 03/04/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2013 Telephone: 717-783-7509
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UNREG LTANKS: Unregulated Tank Cases
Leaking storage tank cases from unregulated storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2003 Telephone: 717-783-7509
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/29/2003 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2003
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LAST: Storage Tank Release Sites
Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Incident Reports.
Date of Government Version: 03/04/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2013 Telephone: 717-783-7509
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 08/27/2012 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2012 Telephone: 303-312-6271
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC3602489.16S Page GR-5
-------
C-51
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2013 Telephone: 206-553-2857
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 65 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 09/28/2012 Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2012 Telephone: 617-918-1313
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2013
Number of Days to Update: 162 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Telephone: 913-551-7003
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Telephone: 214-665-6597
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 59 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 02/06/2013 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2013 Telephone: 404-562-8677
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Telephone: 415-972-3372
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: Listing of Pennsylvania Regulated Underground Storage Tanks
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-6
-------
C-52
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Telephone: 717-772-5599
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AST: Listing of Pennsylvania Regulated Aboveground Storage Tanks
Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Telephone: 717-772-5599
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 02/06/2013 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2013 Telephone: 404-562-9424
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Telephone: 913-551-7003
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 08/02/2012 Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2012 Telephone: 312-886-6136
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 94 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2011 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2011 Telephone: 214-665-7591
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
TC3602489.16S Page GR-7
-------
C-53
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/28/2012 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2012 Telephone: 617-918-1313
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 156 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN USTR10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2013 Telephone: 206-553-2857
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 65 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/21/2013 Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Telephone: 415-972-3368
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 08/27/2012 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2012 Telephone: 303-312-6137
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Telephone: 202-646-5797
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Site Listing
Under the Land Recycling Act (Act 2) persons who perform a site cleanup using the site-specific standard or
the special industrial area standard may use engineering or institutional controls as part of the response action.
Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create
pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2008 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2008 Telephone: 717-783-9470
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/12/2008 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC3602489.16S Page GR-8
-------
C-54
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
AUL: Environmental Covenants Listing
A listing of sites with environmental covenants.
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2013 Telephone: 717-783-7509
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2013
Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INST CONTROL: Institutional Controls Site Listing
Under the Land Recycling Act (Act 2) persons who perform a site cleanup using the site-specific standard or
the special industrial area standard may use engineering or institutional controls as part of the response action.
Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions,
property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants
remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2008 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2008 Telephone: 717-783-9470
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/12/2008 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Telephone: 913-551 -7365
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 09/28/2012 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2012 Telephone: 617-918-1102
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2013
Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites
The VCP listings included Completed Sites, Sites in Progress and Act 2 Non-Use Aquifer Determinations Sites. Formerly
known as the Act 2, the Land Recycling Program encourages the voluntary cleanup and reuse of contaminated commercial
and industrial sites.
Date of Government Version: 01/15/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2013 Telephone: 717-783-2388
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2013
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are generally defined as abandoned or underused industrial or commercial properties where redevelopment
is complicated by actual or perceived environmental contamination. Brownfields vary in size, location, age and
past use. They can range from a small, abandoned corner gas station to a large, multi-acre former manufacturing
plant that has been closed for years.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-9
-------
C-55
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/19/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2013 Telephone: 717-783-1566
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 12/10/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2012 Telephone: 202-566-2777
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2012 Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2013
Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/08/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: 800-424-9346
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: 415-947-4219
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST LF INACTIVE: Inactive Facilities List
A listing of inactive non-hazardous facilities (10000 & 300000 series). This listing is no longer updated or
maintained by the Department of Environmental Protection. At the time the listing was available, the DEP?s name
was the Department of Environmental Resources.
Date of Government Version: 12/20/1994 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2005 Telephone: 717-787-7381
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2005
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC3602489.16S Page GR-10
-------
C-56
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HIST LF INVENTORY: Facility Inventory
A listing of solid waste facilities. This listing is no longer updated or maintained by the Department of Environmental
Protection. At the time the listing was available, the DEP's name was the Department of Environmental Resources.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/1999 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2005 Telephone: 717-787-7381
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2005
Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2005
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST LF ALI: Abandoned Landfill Inventory
The report provides facility information recorded in the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ALI
database. Some of this information has been abstracted from old records and may not accurately reflect the current
conditions and status at these facilities
Date of Government Version: 01/04/2005 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2005 Telephone: 717-787-7564
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Telephone: 703-308-8245
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/19/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 11/14/2012 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2012 Telephone: 202-307-1000
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2013
Number of Days to Update: 66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/17/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Telephone: 202-307-1000
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Number of Days to Update: 131 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
TC3602489.16s Page GR-11
-------
C-57
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ARCHIVE UST: Archived Underground Storage Tank Sites
The list includes tanks storing highly hazardous substances that were removed from the DEP's Storage Tank Information
database because of the Department's policy on sensitive information. The list also may include tanks that are
removed or permanently closed.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Telephone: 717-772-5599
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ARCHIVE AST: Archived Aboveground Storage Tank Sites
The list includes aboveground tanks with a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons that were removed from the DEP's
Storage Tank Information database because of the Department's policy on sensitive information. The list also may
include tanks that are removed or permanently closed.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Telephone: 717-772-5599
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/16/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/26/2012 Telephone: 202-564-6023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ACT 2-DEED: Act 2-Deed Acknowledgment Sites
This listing pertains to sites where the Department has approved a cleanup requiring a deed acknowledgment under
Act 2. This list includes sites remediated to a non-residential Statewide health standard (Section 303(g));
all sites demonstrating attainment of a Site-specific standard (Section 304(m)); and sites being remediated
as a special industrial area (Section 305(g)). Persons who remediated a site to a standard that requires a
deed acknowledgment shall comply with the requirements of the Solid Waste Management Act or the Hazardous Sites
Cleanup Act, as referenced in Act 2. These statutes require a property description section in the deed concerning
the hazardous substance disposal on the site. The location of disposed hazardous substances and a description
of the type of hazardous substances disposed on the site shall be included in the deed acknowledgment. A deed
acknowledgment is required at the time of conveyance of the property.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2010 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2010 Telephone: 717-783-9470
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2010 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2011
Number of Days to Update: 2 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11707/2011
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Telephone: 202-366-4555
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC3602489.16S Page GR-12
-------
C-58
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SPILLS: State spills
A listing of hazardous material incidents.
Date of Government Version: 01/16/2013 Source: DEP, Emergency Response
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2013 Telephone: 717-787-5715
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2013 Telephone: 800-438-2474
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2013
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/19/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: 888-275-8747
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Telephone: 202-528-4285
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2013 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2013
Number of Days to Update: 57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC3602489.16S Page GR-13
-------
C-59
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 12/18/2012 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2013 Telephone: 703-416-0223
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2013
Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Telephone: 505-845-0011
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2013
Number of Days to Update: 146 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2011 Telephone: 303-231 -5959
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/17/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2011 Telephone: 202-566-0250
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2013
Number of Days to Update: 131 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Telephone: 202-260-5521
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2013
Number of Days to Update: 64 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/08/2013
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2013
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC3602489.16S Page GR-14
-------
C-60
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2013
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Telephone: 202-564-2501
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Telephone: 202-564-2501
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Telephone: 202-564-4203
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Telephone: 202-564-5088
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2013
Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC3602489.16S Page GR-15
-------
C-61
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2010 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2010 Telephone: 202-566-0500
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 98 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2011 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2011 Telephone: 301-415-7169
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2013
Number of Days to Update: 60 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 01/08/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2013 Telephone: 202-343-9775
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2013
Number of Days to Update: 93 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 10/23/2011 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2011 Telephone: (215) 814-5000
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Last EDR Contact: 03/12/2013
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Telephone: 202-564-4104
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC3602489.16S Page GR-16
-------
C-62
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2012
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 202-564-8600
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
UIC: Underground Injection Wells
A listing of underground injection well locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/26/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/26/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 23
NPDES: NPDES Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with an NPDES permit.
Date of Government Version: 12/26/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 36
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/23/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012
Number of Days to Update: 57
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Facility Locations
A listing of drycleaner facility locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/25/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-7209
Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/08/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-787-9642
Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-787-9702
Last EDR Contact: 03/25/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/08/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC3602489.16S Page GR-17
-------
C-63
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
AIRS: Permit and Emissions Inventory Data
Permit and emissions inventory data.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2013 Telephone: 717-787-9702
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2013
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Telephone: 202-208-3710
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Telephone: 615-532-8599
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/05/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Telephone: 202-566-0517
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/20/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2012 Telephone: 202-566-1917
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 02/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/03/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-18
-------
C-64
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2012 Telephone: 617-520-3000
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2013
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/27/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2012 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2012 Telephone: 202-564-5962
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2013
Number of Days to Update: 91 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2012 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2012 Telephone: 202-564-5962
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2013
Number of Days to Update: 91 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES: Abandoned Mine Land Inventory
This data set portrays the approximate location of Abandoned Mine Land Problem Areas containing public health,
safety, and public welfare problems created by past coal mining.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: PASDA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2013 Telephone: 814-863-0104
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2013
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/12/2013
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Telephone: 888-275-8747
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2013
Number of Days to Update: 339 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: N/A
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 12/02/2012 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Telephone: 202-564-6023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2013
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/15/2013
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC3602489.16S Page GR-19
-------
C-65
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Telephone: 703-308-4044
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2013
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/27/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Telephone: 703-305-6451
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2013 Telephone: 703-603-8787
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2013
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/22/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2013
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/24/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plan Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Telephone: 202-586-8719
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2013
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and waterthat also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-20
-------
C-66
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners - Cole
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations - Cole
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-21
-------
C-67
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 02/18/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2013
Number of Days to Update: 31
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2012
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: 860-424-3375
Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/03/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/29/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2013
Number of Days to Update: 36
Rl MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2012
Number of Days to Update: 39
VT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 02/15/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2013
Number of Days to Update: 22
Wl MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2012
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/19/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 802-241-3443
Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/01/2013
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs
from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily
gas pipelines.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Rextag Strategies Corp.
Telephone: (281) 769-2247
U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data
TC3602489.16S Page GR-22
-------
C-68
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Public Welfare
Telephone: 717-783-3856
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images
are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image
is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC3602489.16S Page GR-23
-------
Appendix D Supporting Information, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Appendix D
Supporting Information
Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC
May 2015
EPA/600/R-14/103
D-l
-------
Appendix D Supporting Information, Retrospective Case Study in Killdeer, North Dakota May 2015
Table of Contents
Tables
Table D-l Groundwater Depths and General Notes D-3
Table D-2 Field Parameter Results D-5
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results D-8
Table D-4 Metals Results D-18
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results D-42
Table D-6 Dissolved Gas Results D-62
Table D-7 Glycol Results D-66
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results D-67
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results D-77
D-2
-------
Table D-l Groundwater Depths and General Notes
D-3
Surface Casing Depth to
Elevation Elevation Total Groundwater Groundwater
MW-l
MW-1
MW-l
MW-1
MW-l
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW^
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
Jiuuy IL>
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
'"
2276.6
2276.6
2276.6
2276.6
2276.6
2276.6
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2276.33
2278.6
2278.6
2278.6
2278.6
2278.6
2278.6
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2278.43
2275.5
2275.5
2275.5
2275.5
2275.5
2275.5
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2275.31
2277.33
2277.33
2277.33
2277.33
2277.33
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.13
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
2277.53
"
2278.7
2278.7
2278.7
2278.7
2278.7
2278.7
2278.53
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2278.51
2280.9
2280.9
2280.9
2280.9
2280.9
2280.9
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2280.73
2278
2278
2278
2278
2278
2278
2277.76
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2277.77
2280.06
2280.06
2280.06
2280.06
2280.06
2280.03
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2279.92
2277.3
2277.3
2277.26
2277.26
2277.26
2277.26
2277.26
2277.26
2277.26
uepm |ii)
-
42.98
43.67
43.21
43.5
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
43.47
-
-
43.29
43.28
42.95
43.08
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
43.18
-
-
40.56
40.61
40.37
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
40.52
-
70.61
71.65
71.16
71.59
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
72.28
45.22
-
45.22
45.22
45.22
45.22
45.22
45.22
45.22
l"l
34.73
34.66
34.39
34.36
34.59
35.38
32.15
30.57
30.2
29.95
29.52
29.74
29.6
31.09
31.19
37.23
36.98
36.81
36.83
37.4
38.17
35.29
33.38
33.34
33.01
32.54
32.44
32.1
34.6
33.58
34.15
33.93
33.73
33.75
34.33
35.07
32.09
30.03
30.19
29.81
29.35
29.32
29.04
31.43
30.55
36.35
36.09
36.11
36.7
37.33
34.51
32.89
32.51
32.28
31.79
31.65
31.3
33.82
32.85
35.16
-
31.58
29.82
29.47
29.25
28.78
28.54
cievauuii \iif
2243.97
2244.04
2244.31
2244.34
2244.11
2243.32
2246.36
2247.94
2248.31
2248.56
2248.99
2248.77
2248.91
2247.42
2247.32
2243.67
2243.92
2244.09
2244.07
2243.5
2242.73
2245.44
2247.35
2247.39
2247.72
2248.19
2248.29
2248.63
2246.13
2247.15
2243.85
2244.07
2244.27
2244.25
2243.67
2242.93
2245.68
2247.74
2247.58
2247.96
2248.42
2248.45
2248.73
2246.34
2247.22
2243.71
2243.97
2243.95
2243.36
2242.73
2245.41
2247.03
2247.41
2247.64
2248.13
2248.27
2248.62
2246.1
2247.07
2242.14
-
2245.68
2247.44
2247.79
2248.01
2248.48
2248.72
Screen Interval 35-45 ft below ground surface
-
-
-
New survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.1 ft for pump install
-
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
Screen Interval 35-45 ft below ground surface
-
-
New survey
Well casing cut approx 0.1 ft for pump install
-
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
Screen Interval 25-40 ft below ground surface
-
-
New survey
Well casing cut approx 0.1 ft for pump install
-
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
Screen Interval 32-72 ft below ground surface
-
-
New survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.2 ft for pump install
-
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
-
Screen Interval 31-46 ft below ground surface
Initial survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.2 ft for pump install
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
Not sampled due to site activity conditions
-
-------
Table D-l Groundwater Depths and General Notes
D-4
Surface Casing Depth to
Elevation Elevation Total Groundwater Groundwater
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Jiuuy IL>
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
'"
2277.53
2277.53
2278.03
2271.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2277.61
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2278.03
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
2277.8
"
2277.26
2277.26
2280.56
2277.46
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2277.36
2280.56
2280.56
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.67
2280.67
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.2
2280.56
2280.56
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
2280.22
uepm |ii)
72.93
-
45.79
46.79
46.79
46.79
46.79
46.79
46.79
46.79
-
72.93
72.93
73.93
73.93
73.93
73.93
73.93
73.93
73.93
-
122.53
-
122.53
122.53
122.53
122.53
122.53
122.53
122.53
122.53
217.4
-
217.4
217.4
217.4
217.4
217.4
217.4
217.4
217.4
l"l
30.08
37.84
-
31.67
30.14
29.59
29.23
28.87
28.92
28.61
31.43
30.08
37.84
34.6
32.79
32.64
32.37
31.9
31.85
31.59
33.96
33.11
37.85
-
34.62
32.8
32.69
32.38
31.92
31.89
31.58
33.9
33.08
25.31
-
21.39
20.04
19.85
19.76
19.6
19.82
19.98
20.85
21.73
cievauuii \iif
2247.18
2242.72
-
2245.69
2247.22
2247.77
2248.13
2248.49
2248.44
2248.75
2245.93
2247.28
2242.72
2245.62
2247.43
2247.58
2247.85
2248.32
2248.37
2248.63
2246.26
2247.11
2242.82
-
2245.58
2247.4
2247.51
2247.82
2248.28
2248.31
2248.62
2246.3
2247.12
2255.25
-
2258.83
2260.18
2260.37
2260.46
2260.62
2260.4
2260.24
2259.37
2258.49
Screen Interval 55-70 ft below ground surface
Initial survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.3 ft for pump install
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
-
Screen Interval 55-70 ft below ground surface
Initial survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.5 ft for pump install
-
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
Screen Interval 80-120 ft below ground surface
Initial survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.5 ft for pump install
Stovepipe covered with oil and dirt from wo rig.
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
-
After this measurement the casing was cut 0.37'
Screen Interval 178-213 ft below ground surface
Initial survey
Well casing cut approx. 0.5 ft for pump install
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
transducer in place
-
-
After this measurement the casing was cut 0.35'
*estimated due to casing modifications after sampling but before survey was completed
All well were re-surveyed (April 27, 2011) after MW-5 through MW-8D were installed
Casings for MW-8S and MW-8D were modified following the October 2012 sampling event to allow for more
1a workover rig prevented access to the well
Casings for MW-8S and MW-8D were modified following the October 2012 sampling event to allow for more
room between the top of the casing and the stovepipe monument lid.
room between the top of the casing and the stovepipe monument lid.
-------
D-5
Table D-2 Field Parameter Results
«.. m ,,e
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
Temp.
(a
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.8
7.98
7.95
8.46
7.83
8.31
7.08
8.07
8.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.83
9.39
9.49
10.41
10.47
10.74
8.78
9.27
8.61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9.22
8.95
10.22
10.4
11.55
9.47
8.45
10.32
Specific
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.737
0.713
0.687
0.536
0.751
0.771
0.534
0.87
1.034
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.057
1.076
10
1.036
1.035
1.026
1.02
0.983
0.995
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.645
0.911
0.88
0.887
0.882
0.864
0.856
0.885
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.35
4.75
10.86
9.19
8.08
10.98
8.08
6.8
3.99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.79
3.05
4.35
0.09
0.93
1.06
0.33
0.41
0.48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.39
2.91
4.14
1.58
2.06
1.73
0.87
6.02
^^^EIu
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.31
8.18
9.7
7.67
7.61
7.96
12.57
8.19
8.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.53
8.01
8.61
7.56
8.14
8.59
8.62
8.52
8.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.63
7.99
9.07
8.58
8.04
7.99
8.37
8.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
148
100
111
139
86
74
-219
25
45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
54
114
81
88
28
-59
-60
2
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99.9
62
111
80
63
39
84
15
-------
D-6
Table D-2 Field Parameter Results
State ID
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
Study ID
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
Date
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/23/2010
1/12/2011
2/23/2011
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
Temp.
(°C)
8.21
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.58
8.83
9.46
10.04
9.32
9.47
8.58
8.84
8.72
-
-
8.92
8.86
10.03
11.65
10.96
9.1
9.9
9.09
-
-
10.4
9.59
10.71
11.75
10.6
11.57
9.5
10.29
9.44
-
-
8.59
9.1
9.66
10.49
9.9
10.75
8.72
Specific
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
0.891
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.12
2.17
1.83
1.85
1.87
1.86
1.939
1.835
2.077
-
-
1.299
1.224
1.07
1.22
1.079
1.091
1.006
1.068
-
-
1.311
1.268
1.051
1.059
1.019
0.994
0.705
0.772
1.167
-
-
1.41
1.236
1.78
2.43
3.47
3.87
3.921
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
4.35
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.39
1.83
3.19
0.35
0.46
0.93
0.08
0.31
0.3
-
-
0.21
2.5
1.73
0.17
1.07
1.86
0.14
1.58
-
-
0.29
1.61
1.07
0.07
0.73
0.62
1.22
0.17
0.54
-
-
0.3
1.14
2.08
0.32
1.95
0.53
2.57
PH
7.53
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.14
7.86
8.98
8.32
7.56
7.72
7.34
7.37
7.34
-
-
8.09
7.98
9.3
8.03
7.67
9.33
7.58
8.17
-
-
8.09
7.71
9.05
7.45
8.16
8.85
10.28
7.49
8.16
-
-
8.48
8.18
8.95
8.78
7.85
8.36
7.52
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-50
-72
-35
-63
-175
-168
-42
-78.8
-92.9
-
-
6
57
67
-26
56
-8
18
47
-
-
71
57
85
91
86
65
-240
-8
46
-
-
-84
-184
-254
-208
-223
-196
-80
-------
D-7
Table D-2 Field Parameter Results
State ID
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/24/2011
4/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
Temp.
(°C)
10.49
9.6
-
-
9.24
10.1
10.88
11.47
10.2
11.12
9.68
12.21
11.14
-
-
9.05
10
10.44
11.85
10.93
11.02
10.14
11.97
11.15
Specific
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
6.61
2.927
-
-
4.16
11.06
11.02
8.225
8.73
7.39
6.25
3.202
2.984
-
-
1.87
1.89
1.86
1.88
1.87
1.86
1.92
1.701
1.851
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
0.4
0.28
-
-
0.24
0.68
2.4
0.22
0.74
3.07
0.57
0.28
0.22
-
-
0.27
0.86
2.35
1.07
1.32
3.99
0.14
0.29
0.33
PH
7.26
7.43
-
-
8.32
7.28
7.25
7.38
7.57
7.73
7.33
7.4
7.39
-
-
8.8
9.02
9.67
8.9
8.85
9.16
8.4
8.52
8.63
-99.3
-73.7
-
-
-166
-149
-129
-111.2
-139
-137
-157
-142.4
-170.9
-
-
27
-127
-129
-104
-144
-133
71
-85.9
-173.2
-------
D-8
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
State ID1
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
Date Collected
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
LabpH
8.0
8.07
7.4
7.66
7.B
7.4
7.B
7.6
7.B6
7.9
7.62
7.6
7.4
7.B
7.6
7.72
7.6
7.6B
7.6
7.B
7.6
7.6
7.47
7.B
7.66
7.7
7.B
7.B
7.8
7.7B
7.6
7.6B
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.4
pHQC
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen
10.4
-
7.1
-
7.3
6.7
6.9
7.8
7.B
-
9.7
-
7.0
6.6
7.4
7.6
7.0
-
9.B
-
B.7
3.9
7.1
7.8
4.2
-
6.1
-
8.6
7.3
6.8
7.8
8.1
-
8.6
-
9.6
6.1
8.B
7.8
1.7
Lab Total
Dissolved Alkalinity Total Alkalinity
Oxygen QC as CaCOS as CaCOS QC
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
B27
B28
Bll
BIB
B31
BB2
B81
B28
B3B
B49
B33
B39
B49
B46
BB4
BB1
431
441
428
42B
449
437
434
442
470
471
4B9
4B8
474
462
469
4B7
380
384
380
38B
33B
423
394
382
696
NO3 + NO2 NO3 + NO2 QC
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.03
0.01
0.07
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.03
<0.01
<0.03
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.03
<0.01
<0.03
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.10
0.10
0.12
0.11
1.20
0.10
0.16
0.18
3.18
-------
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
D-9
Study ID
Date Collected
NH3QC
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-B
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW1B
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
0.20
0.16
0.2B
0.33
0.19
0.02
0.29
0.24
0.21
0.26
0.22
0.17
0.14
0.19
0.19
0.21
0.10
0.12
0.09
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.20
0.1B
0.20
0.17
0.14
0.18
0.20
0.19
-------
D-10
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
State ID1
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
Study ID
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
Date Collected
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
LabpH
7.48
7.3
7.B1
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.3
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
8.0
7.6B
7.8
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.B
7.6
7.7
7.4
7.6
7.B
7.6
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.0
7.78
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.8
7.B
7.6
7.8
pHQC
H
H
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen
-
8.1
-
7.9
6.0
7.4
7.9
8.0
7.3
7.4
7.9
8.1
6.8
7.6
2.2
7.3
-
6.8
9.2
7.B
-
7.9
7.7
7.3
8.B
8.6
9.8
10.0
9.B
7.9
10.8
6.9
7.6
-
6.6
8.4
6.B
-
7.2
8.7
9.6
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen QC
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Total
Alkalinity Total Alkalinity
as CaCOS as CaCOS QC
708
684
684
74B
111
7BB
727
716
B28
B3B
BB1
B46
B47
BB3
B62
110
169
232
269
313
307
3 IB
32B
338
329
27B
278
246
241
24B
2B4
304
192
29B
338
33B
34B
3B2
341
331
361
NO3 + NO2 NO3 + NO2 QC
3.06
7.BO
7.20
11.6
9.38
11.9
12.6
21.0
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.32
0.34
0.23
0.4B
0.66
0.80
0.82
1.10
0.81
1.19
0.37
0.36
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.13
0.22
0.44
0.39
0.24
0.29
0.34
0.38
0.47
0.62
O.BO
D
D
D
D
D
-------
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
D-ll
Study ID
Date Collected
NH3QC
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
Well 14B09B29AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
<0.03
-------
D-12
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
State ID1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-B
MW-B
Study ID
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
Date Collected
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/1B/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
LabpH
7.B
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.4
7.6
7.7
8.0
7.89
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.B
7.7
8.0
7.8
7.6
7.B7
7.4
7.4
7.B
7.6
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.B
7.7
7.7
pHQC
H
H
H
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen
9.1
B.3
6.2
6.0
4.9
B.O
9.4
4.4
6.9
-
6.2
8.7
7.6
8.7
6.6
10.1
8.B
6.9
7.B
6.3
6.3
6.9
9.4
B.O
7.0
8.7
-
7.4
6.0
7.6
8.6
8.3
6.1
B.2
6.7
7.3
7.7
9.2
2.9
8.6
3.3
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen QC
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Total
Alkalinity Total Alkalinity
as CaCOS as CaCOS QC
3B9
3BO
3B2
3BO
3BO
3B1
341
3B3
221
241
248
297
320
333
336
3B8
377
363
360
3B8
3B6
3B6
366
391
309
426
4B6
439
444
440
49B
B13
499
492
4B8
4B1
462
428
433
40B
390
NO3 + NO2 NO3 + NO2 QC
0.37
0.46
O.B1
O.BB
O.B6
O.B3
0.6B
0.77
0.41
0.14
0.01
0.08
0.06
0.26
0.07
0.29
0.29
0.16
0.39
0.33
0.30
0.26
0.20
0.10
0.16
0.01
<0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
0.66
0.33
D
-------
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
D-13
Study ID
Date Collected
NH3QC
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-B
MW-B
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/1B/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
-------
D-14
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
State ID1
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
LabpH
7.6
7.6
7.B
7.B
7.6
7.7
7.B
7.7
7.4
7.B
7.B
7.B
7.4
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.6
7.B
7.4
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.B
7.4
7.B
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.9
7.3
7.4
7.8
8.4
8.3
pHQC
H
H
H
H
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen
8.2
7.B
7.1
2.7
6.6
9.8
8.8
8.6
8.4
6.9
B.7
6.B
6.2
B.6
7.0
9.7
8.4
7.0
B.B
6.3
6.2
4.8
6.B
6.3
6.2
9.9
6.2
7.8
6.9
6.8
B.2
3.9
6.8
6.1
6.6
10.4
B.6
10.8
6.7
6.7
Lab
Dissolved
Oxygen QC
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Total
Alkalinity Total Alkalinity
as CaCOS as CaCOS QC
391
372
377
371
367
380
39B
394
408
403
419
414
368
362
360
341
312
400
417
407
368
344
341
293
28B
380
441
397
419
269
278
319
324
3B3
390
44B
447
423
812
823
NO3 + NO2 NO3 + NO2 QC
0.40
1.11
1.04
1.34
1.37
l.BB
1.18
1.09
0.2B
0.49
0.92
1.08
1.10
1.20
1.15
1.2B
0.98
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.02
<0.01
0.02
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
0.02
<0.01
0.02
0.02
O.OB
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.03
<0.01
0.03
D
D
D
D
D
D
-------
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
D-15
Study ID
Date Collected
NH3QC
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-B
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGWOB
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
0.06
-------
D-16
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
Lab Lab Total
Dissolved Dissolved Alkalinity Total Alkalinity
State ID1
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
LabpH
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
pHQC
H
Oxygen
5.1
6.8
5.6
4.0
7.2
10.1
4.7
Oxygen QC
H
H
as CaCOS
mg/L
844
838
801
806
808
811
819
as CaCOS QC
NO3 + NO2 NO3 + NO2 QC
0.01
<0.01
0.10
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
Footnote:
'Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
NDGW05 on 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-17
Table D-3 Anion, Nutrient, and Physical Chemistry Results
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
NDGW05 on 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
State ID1
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/B/2012
10/18/2012
NH3
0.23
0.21
0.20
0.3B
0.22
0.23
0.24
NH3QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-18
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
^^Uj££^d
58
60
61
64
62
65
134
62
48
46
44
45
44
46
45
45
35
34
31
33
32
33
32
32
38
28
36
38
35
35
34
34
34
mg/L
7
7
7
7
7
6
9
7
6
6
7
6
6
7
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
4
6
5
5
5
6
5
3
mg/L
25
27
26
27
25
26
56
25
20
21
20
20
19
20
21
20
12
12
11
12
11
11
12
11
12
11
12
12
11
11
12
11
12
^^Uj££^d
248
280
273
267
262
257
294
262
254
271
275
259
268
273
303
262
174
181
184
176
180
173
197
178
213
213
213
212
196
208
229
206
146
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-19
Sample ID1
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
Date Collected
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
Total Ag
mg/L
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total Ag
QC
Total As
mg/L
<0.005
0.004
0.006
<0.005
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
0.005
0.004
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
<0.005
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.007
0.007
0.007
<0.005
Total As
QC
Total Ba
mg/L
<0.1
0.03
<0.1
0.03
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.03
<0.1
0.03
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.06
<0.1
0.05
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.03
<1.0
0.03
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Total Ba
QC
Total Cd
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Total Cd
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
Total Pb
D-20
Total Pb
QC
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
^^Uj££^d
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.1
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.00101
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
mg/L
0.37
-
0.04
-
1.65
3.13
8.08
3.41
0.14
-
0.29
-
2.23
2.43
2.06
2.52
0.03
-
0.05
-
0.99
1.08
1.08
1.13
0.10
-
0.06
-
0.92
0.96
0.86
1.18
<0.03
mg/L
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
^^Ul^C^d
<0.01
0.0112
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.1
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.00101
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
-------
D-21
Table D-4 Metal Results
Total Se
Sample ID1
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
Date Collected
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
Total Se
mg/L
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-22
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
^^Uj££^d
35
31
33
51
34
32
33
78
68
87
87
90
96
94
93
118
45
38
38
44
44
43
45
36
42
43
47
49
51
45
45
41
36
D
D
mg/L
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
6
5
7
6
6
7
6
7
7
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
7
4
5
5
6
6
5
6
4
4
mg/L
13
12
13
17
12
12
12
33
32
39
40
40
43
42
44
54
18
18
17
18
19
17
20
11
13
12
14
14
15
14
13
12
10
^^Uj££^d
156
157
160
96
151
169
159
316
306
370
359
363
378
370
385
412
236
255
240
248
278
248
248
82
87
92
105
116
115
45
128
113
107
D
D
D
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-23
Sample ID1
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
Study ID
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
Date Collected
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
Total Ag
mg/L
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total Ag
QC
Total As
mg/L
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.003
<0.005
0.002
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total As
QC
Total Ba
mg/L
0.05
<0.1
0.04
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.05
<0.1
0.05
<0.1
0.10
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.05
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
Total Ba
QC
Total Cd
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.00
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Total Cd
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
Total Pb
D-24
Total Pb
QC
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
0.011
<0.01
0.02
0.01
0.0222
<0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
mg/L
-
<0.03
-
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
-
<0.03
-
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.05
0.13
1.04
1.59
3.58
3.24
2.93
0.66
-
0.14
0.11
0.06
-
0.21
0.05
<0.03
<0.03
mg/L
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.00005
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.1
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
0.01
0.00637
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.00738
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
-------
D-25
Table D-4 Metal Results
Total Se
Sample ID1
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
Study ID
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
Date Collected
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
Total Se
mg/L
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.01
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-26
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
37
38
42
41
44
51
71
39
47
46
52
51
56
46
48
50
51
50
50
49
48
51
46
44
42
44
47
55
58
56
57
56
52
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
7
5
6
5
6
9
5
6
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
4
7
5
6
6
7
6
8
6
6
11
11
12
12
13
14
21
17
21
20
23
23
25
21
20
21
22
22
21
21
21
21
19
20
12
13
12
15
16
16
16
15
15
111
106
116
118
125
124
128
125
144
145
155
162
158
160
164
152
157
159
156
164
170
175
154
148
73
68
88
110
122
147
137
142
131
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-27
Sample ID1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
Study ID
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
Date Collected
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
Total Ag Total As Total Ba Total Cd
TotalAg QC Total As QC Total Ba QC Totaled QC
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
-
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
-
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
0.002
<0.005
0.033
<0.005
0.017
0.006
0.015
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
0.004
<0.005
0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.08
0.2
0.22
0.2
2.4
0.2
1.33
0.4
1.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.05
0.3
0.52
0.2
1.2
0.3
0.2
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.00143
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
Total Pb
D-28
Total Pb
QC
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
0.0199
<0.01
0.12
0.01
0.066
0.02
0.06
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
0.01
0.0174
<0.01
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.72
-
0.06
0.39
<0.03
-
0.34
0.07
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.65
-
0.09
0.39
<0.03
0.04
0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.00005
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
0.0072
<0.01
0.04
<0.01
0.0218
<0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
0.016
<0.01
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
-------
D-29
Table D-4 Metal Results
Total Se
Sample ID1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
Study ID
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
Date Collected
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
Total Se
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
0.00122
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
0.00141
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-30
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
51
50
50
47
51
49
51
51
89
101
81
93
85
105
103
95
94
97
99
108
113
128
52
50
45
41
43
41
40
42
39
63
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
8
8
8
7
8
7
8
7
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
14
13
14
13
13
13
15
21
39
46
37
40
34
48
51
41
42
41
38
41
42
51
17
17
16
13
13
13
13
13
13
21
139
141
144
144
146
143
136
141
279
298
288
301
279
307
348
296
293
309
316
327
302
310
228
214
206
196
195
205
213
206
187
205
D
D
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-31
Sample ID1
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
Study ID
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
Date Collected
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
Total Ag
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
Total Ag
QC
Total As
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
0.021
0.008
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
Total As
QC
Total Ba
mg/L
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.07
1.7
0.4
0.21
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.07
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.05
<0.1
Total Ba
QC
Total Cd
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.008
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Total Cd
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
Total Pb
D-32
Total Pb
QC
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
0.18
0.04
0.0154
0.02
<0.01
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.03
<0.005
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
mg/L
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.34
0.33
-
<0.03
0.13
0.10
0.17
0.38
0.16
0.17
0.28
0.19
0.29
0.04
0.17
1.66
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.04
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.00005
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
0.06
0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
-------
D-33
Table D-4 Metal Results
Total Se
Sample ID1
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
Study ID
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
Date Collected
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
Total Se
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-34
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
^^Uj££^d
69
60
53
51
47
44
46
36
55
46
46
38
76
136
221
256
381
469
162
161
254
820
685
632
529
434
370
194
136
32
4
3
3
D
D
D
D
mg/L
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
6
6
5
6
8
9
10
12
13
9
9
9
19
20
16
15
13
12
9
8
7
3
3
3
mg/L
24
23
19
18
16
16
16
12
20
19
20
18
31
55
92
108
159
183
66
72
115
393
316
300
249
204
175
87
63
11
2
2
2
D
D
^^Uj££^d
192
193
172
171
164
169
173
150
178
234
243
221
285
346
458
521
647
800
419
383
434
859
1210
1090
965
886
784
463
401
231
471
451
470
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
D-35
Sample ID1
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
Total Ag
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total Ag
QC
Total As
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total As
QC
Total Ba
mg/L
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.05
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.05
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Total Ba
QC
Total Cd
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Total Cd
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
Total Pb
D-36
Total Pb
QC
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
0.02
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
mg/L
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.10
0.11
0.20
0.76
1.38
2.51
2.98
4.02
4.23
2.25
0.05
6.29
21.00
25.90
25.60
22.60
18.40
17.00
10.10
6.82
0.04
<0.03
<0.03
0.04
D
D
D
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
-------
D-37
Table D-4 Metal Results
Total Se
Sample ID1
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
Total Se
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
0.025
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
0.018
0.018
0.022
0.021
0.021
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
QC
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
MW-8D
NDGW09
7/18/2011
D-38
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Ca CaQC K K QC Mg MgQC Na Na QC
449
MW-8D
NDGW09
8/16/2011
492
MW-8D
NDGW09
9/7/2011
426
MW-8D
NDGW09
10/18/2011
475
MW-8D
NDGW09
4/5/2012
448
MW-8D
NDGW09
10/18/2012
467
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Ag
Total Ag
QC Total As
Total As
QC
Total Ba
Total Ba
QC
D-39
Total Cd
Total Cd QC
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
mg/L mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
mg/L mg/L
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected Total Cr
MW-8D
NDGW09
7/18/2011
Total Cr Dissolved Dissolved Total Hg
QC Fe FeQC Total Hg QC
<0.01
0.04
<0.001
Total Pb
<0.01
D-40
Total Pb
QC
MW-8D
NDGW09
8/16/2011
<0.01
<0.03
<0.001
<0.01
MW-8D
NDGW09
9/7/2011
<0.01
<0.03
<0.001
<0.01
MW-8D
NDGW09
10/18/2011
<0.01
<0.03
<0.001
<0.01
MW-8D
NDGW09
4/5/2012
<0.01
<0.03
<0.0001
<0.01
MW-8D
NDGW09
10/18/2012
<0.005
0.03
<0.0001
<0.001
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
Table D-4 Metal Results
Sample ID1
Study ID
Date Collected
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
Total Se
mg/L
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
D-41
Total Se
QC
-------
D-42
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
N DGW1 5
N DGW1 5
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
N DGW1 5
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
N DGW1 3
N DGW1 3
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
N DGW1 2
N DGW1 2
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/201 0
9/2/201 0
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
1 0/1 9/201 1
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/201 0
1 /1 3/201 1
1/13/2011
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
nt.ua
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<0 5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0 5
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0 5
<1 0
<0.5
-------
D-43
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
N DGW1 6
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
N DGW1 6
N DGW1 6
N DGW1 5
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1 /1 3/201 1
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/201 2
9/2/201 0
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<0.5
<1 0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1 n
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
-------
D-44
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
-------
D-45
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
M9/L
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
mSa
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
mSa
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.54
<0.5
<1.0
0.59
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
J
-------
D-46
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
N DGW1 0
N DGW1 0
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
N DGW01
N DGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/1 9/201 1
8/4/201 1
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
EMSl
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
B3JHB5
...
...
<1.0
MS
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
MSJ
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
MS
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.25
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
J
-------
D-47
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
N DGW1 2
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
N DGW01
N DGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
8/4/201 1
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/201 1
7/20/201 1
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/201 0
1 0/8/201 0
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
M9
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
M9
...
...
<5.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
M9
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
M9
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
M9
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-48
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Sample ID1
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
8/4/201 1
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/201 1
7/20/201 1
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
Mma
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
13
10.4
6
4.2
2.7
2.64
2
1.9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mmm
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
4.7
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mmm
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mmm
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-49
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
WelM4509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/201 1
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/201 1
7/19/2011
8/4/201 1
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/201 1
7/20/201 1
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
M9/L
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
KM9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.1
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.26
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
J
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-50
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
N DGW02
N DGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
N DGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
N DGW03
N DGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
N DGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
1 0/8/201 0
11/24/2010
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
-------
D-51
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
N DGW02
N DGW02
N DGW02
N DGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
N DGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
N DGW03
N DGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
N DGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1 /1 3/201 1
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/1 8/201 1
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
1 0/8/201 0
11/24/2010
mSZa
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
mSa
<5.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
<5.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
<5.0
...
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0 5
<1 0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
-------
D-52
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
mSa
<1.0
4.6
2.45
0.3
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.97
0.79
2.4
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
2.1
J
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
0.29
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
J
mSa
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
0.21
<0.5
0.27
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
J
J
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-53
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
M9/L
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.6
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<1.0
0.58
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
J
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-54
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
N DGW04
N DGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
N DGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
N DGW06
N DGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
N DGW07
N DGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/1 8/201 1
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/201 1
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
nt.ua
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<50
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
<50
...
mm
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
-------
D-55
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
N DGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
N DGW04
N DGW04
N DGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
N DGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/1 8/201 1
8/1 8/201 1
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/201 2
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
mm
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
<5.0
...
...
...
...
<5.0
...
...
...
...
<5.0
...
...
mm
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mm
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mm
...
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
0.62
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-56
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
M9
0.93
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.3
2
1.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
2.6
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-57
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/201 1
3/27/201 1
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/201 1
5/3/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
M9/L
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1
1.4
1.3
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
3.2
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mm
-
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
2.6
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.7
1.4
1.4
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
5.8
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
-------
D-58
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
N DGW08
N DGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
N DGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
nt.ua
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<50
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
<50
mm
...
...
...
<50
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
<1.0
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-59
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
N DGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
N DGW08
N DGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
N DGW09
N DGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/1 6/201 1
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/5/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/1 8/201 1
8/1 6/201 1
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
nun
...
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
<50
...
...
...
...
<50
mm
...
...
...
...
302
...
...
...
232
...
...
...
...
<5.0
mm
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mm
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mm
...
...
...
...
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1 0
<1 0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-60
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/5/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
M9
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
4.2
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-61
Table D-5 Volatile Organic Compound Results
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/201 1
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/2/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/201 1
5/5/201 1
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/201 1
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
M9/L
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
mSa
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-62
Table D-6 Dissolved Gas Results
Sample ID1
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
Date Collected
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
Methane
(74 82 8)
0.001
0.003
-
0.006
0.006
0.0037
0.0064
0.002
0.003
-
0.003
0.003
0.0037
0.0027
0.001
0.001
-
0.001
0.001
0.0018
0.0019
<0.003
0.002
-
0.002
0.002
0.0025
0.0022
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
0.0011
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
Methane
QC
Ethane
(74 84 0)
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
O.OOIO
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
-
<0.001
Ethane
QC
Ethene
(74 85 1)
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
Ethene
QC
-------
D-63
Table D-6 Dissolved Gas Results
Sample ID1
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
Study ID
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
Date Collected
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
Methane
(74 82 8)
0.002
0.001
0.0013
<0.0010
0.016
0.016
0.011
0.016
0.0084
0.019
0.0062
0.005
-
0.004
0.003
0.001
-
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.0011
<0.0010
0.002
0.002
0.001
<0.001
0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.0011
<0.0010
Methane
QC
Ethane
(74 84 0)
mg/L
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.001
-
0.002
0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
Ethane
QC
Ethene
(74 85 1)
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
-
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
Ethene
QC
-------
D-64
Table D-6 Dissolved Gas Results
Sample ID1 Study ID
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
Date Collected
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
Methane
(74 82 8)
0.004
0.039
0.027
0.007
0.002
0.005
0.003
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.012
0.011
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
O.OOIO
0.0011
O.OOIO
O.OOIO
0.006
0.007
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.0012
<0.0010
0.002
Methane Ethane
QC (74 84 0)
0.002
-
0.022
0.016
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.005
0.005
-
0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
O.OOIO
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.006
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.001
Ethane
QC
Ethene
(74 85 1)
0.002
0.01
0.006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.003
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
O.OOIO
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
Ethene
QC
-------
D-65
Table D-6 Dissolved Gas Results
Sample ID1 Study ID
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
Methane
(74 82 8)
0.008
0.002
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
0.003
0.009
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.0021
0.0012
0.0073
0.011
0.0022
0.003
0.014
0.009
0.026
0.019
0.027
0.019
0.016
0.0079
0.0041
0.001
0.006
0.003
0.008
0.005
0.007
0.0054
0.0074
0.0064
0.0065
Methane
QC
Ethane
(74 84 0)
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
0.004
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.0012
0.018
0.0055
<0.001
0.003
<0.001
0.003
0.002
0.0028
0.0021
0.0026
0.0037
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
Ethane
QC
Ethene
(74 85 1)
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0010
Ethene
QC
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-66
Table D-7 Glycol Results
Units
QL
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8D
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW09
10/18/2012
10/18/2012
10/17/2012
10/17/2012
10/17/2012
10/17/2012
10/18/2012
10/18/2012
10/18/2012
10/18/2012
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
Footnote:
1Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
-------
D-67
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Units
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
-------
D-68
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
-------
D-69
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
mm mm mm
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
-------
D-70
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
mm mm mm
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
...
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
...
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
...
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
...
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
-------
D-71
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
mm mm mm
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holdingtime
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
D-72
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Sample ID
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
Date Collected
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
H
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
-------
D-73
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Sample ID Study ID Date Collected 5 5 5
Units
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
"
-------
D-74
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Sample ID Study ID Date Collected 5 5 5
Units
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
"
-------
D-75
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
Sample ID Study ID Date Collected 5 5 5
Units
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
"
-------
D-76
Table D-8 Semivolatile Organic Results
muaajM ^UttllW ! ! =
Units
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
"So
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
"So
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
s^l
^^
"So
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
a
^^H
"So
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
^^
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holdingtime
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-77
Sample ID1
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-5
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CW-4
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
Truchan Depot
CONFIDENTIAL
Study ID
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW16
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW15
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW11
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW13
NDGW12
Date Collected GRO GRO QC
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
10/7/2010
10/7/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
<20
-
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
DRO
<300
-
<300
-
<320
<300
<300
<300
<300
-
<300
-
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
-
<300
-
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
-
<310
-
<310
<300
<310
<300
<310
DROQC
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-78
Sample ID1
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
Well 14509529AAAD
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
Study ID
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW12
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW10
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW14
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
Date Collected GRO GROQC DRO DROQC
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/3/2011
7/19/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
9/2/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
5/4/2011
7/19/2011
8/4/2011
10/19/2011
4/6/2012
9/2/2010
1/14/2011
5/3/2011
7/20/2011
10/17/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
5/31/2011
-
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
-
<20
140
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<300
-
<310
<310
<300
<300
<310
-
<310
-
<310
<310
<310
<310
<300
360
<310
<310
<300
<300
<300
<310
<320
-
<300
<320
<300
-
<310
<310
<310
<310
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-79
Sample ID1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-1
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-2
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
Study ID
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW01
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW02
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
Date Collected
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
9/3/2010
9/7/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
9/3/2010
9/8/2010
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
GRO
Mi/L
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
GROQC
DRO
Mi/L
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
340
-
<300
<310
<310
-
<310
<300
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
<310
<300
<300
<300
<350
-
<300
<330
<300
<320
<300
<310
<300
DROQC
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-80
Sample ID1
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-4
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-5
MW-6
Study ID
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW03
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW04
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW05
NDGW06
Date Collected GRO GROQC DRO DROQC
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/15/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
10/8/2010
11/24/2010
1/12/2011
1/13/2011
2/23/2011
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/18/2011
9/6/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/17/2012
3/27/2011
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
-
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
81
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<310
<300
<300
<300
<310
<300
<300
320
<320
-
<310
<310
<300
<320
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<310
<300
<300
<310
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<310
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-81
Sample ID1
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-6
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-7
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8S
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW06
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW07
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW08
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected
5/3/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/9/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/2/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
3/27/2011
5/5/2011
6/1/2011
7/10/2011
GRO
Mi/L
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
GROQC
DRO
<320
<300
<300
<300
<310
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
950
<310
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
590
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<310
<300
<300
460
<310
<310
<300
DROQC
-------
Table D-9 Diesel Range Organics and Gasoline Range Organics Results
D-82
Footnote:
Homeowner Names are redacted for Privacy Concerns
J = estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit
H = Analysis performed past recommended holding time
D = Reporting limit increased due to sample matrix
MW-5 9/7/2011 Not sampled due to site activity
Sample ID1
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
MW-8D
Study ID
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
NDGW09
Date Collected GRO GROQC DRO DROQC
7/18/2011
8/16/2011
9/7/2011
10/18/2011
4/5/2012
10/18/2012
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
<300
-------
vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGES FEES PAID
EPA
PERMIT NO. G-35
Office of Research and Development (8101R)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
------- |