EPA/600/R-15/088 | www.epa.gov/research |
National  Conference on
Mining-Influenced  Waters
 Approaches for Characterization, Source Control and Treatment
             August 12-14, 2014
 Sheraton Albuquerque Uptown Hotel • Albuquerque, New Mexico
  Environmental Protectii
  Agency
Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Office of Research and Development
    Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
         Region6, Dallas, TX

-------
  U.S. EPA Proceedings of National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters:
        Approaches for Characterization, Source Control and Treatment
                                     Edited by:
                                    Diana Bless
                                   Douglas Grosse
                         EPA Number: EPA/600/R-15/088
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency), through its Office of Research
and Development (ORD), sponsored a conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico on August 12-
14, 2014. This document was compiled by Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC) under Contract No. EP-W-09-032 from presentations and open discussion at the
conference.  The views expressed in these Proceedings are those of the individual authors and do
not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA. Scientists in EPA's Office of Research
and Development have prepared the EPA sections, and those sections have been reviewed in
accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication.
Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use. The references contained within the presentation abstracts have been
provided by the speakers. For questions regarding abstract content or references please contact
the speakers directly.

-------
                               Table of Contents







List of Steering Committee Members	2






Final Agenda	3






List of Poster Presentations	8
List of Exhibitors	9







Presentation Abstracts & Speaker Bio-Sketches for Tuesday, August 12, 2014	10







Presentation Abstracts & Speaker Bio-Sketches for Wednesday, August 13, 2014	32







Presentation Abstracts & Speaker Bio-Sketches for Thursday, August 14, 2014	63







Poster Abstracts	72







List of Speakers and Poster Presenters	86

-------
       National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                           Steering Committee
Conference Co-Chairs:
Committee Members:
Douglas Grosse, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Office of Research and Development (ORD),
National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL)
Diana Bless, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Barbara Butler, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Mark Doolan, U.S. EPA
Gregory Gervais, U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
   Response (OSWER), Office of Superfund Remediation and
   Technology Innovation (OSRTI)
Michael Gonzalez, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
James Hanley, U.S. EPA Region 8
John Hillenbrand, U.S. EPA Region 9
Stephen Hoffman, U.S. EPA, OSWER
Chris Impellitteri, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Scott Jacobs, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Jim Lazorchak, U.S. EPA, ORD, National Exposure Research
   Laboratory
Shahid Mahmud, U.S. EPA, OSWER, OSRTI
Michele Mahoney, U.S. EPA, OSWER, OSRTI
Steven McDonald, USDA Forest Service
John McKernan, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Mark Purcell, U.S. EPA Region 6
John Quander, U.S. EPA, OSWER, OSRTI
Carol Russell, U.S. EPA, Region 8
Joseph Schubauer-Berigan, U.S. EPA, ORD, NRMRL
Robert Weber, U.S. EPA,  ORD, Office of Science Policy

-------
                  Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                           CONFERENCEAGENDA
Day 1 - Tuesday, August 12, 2014
7:30 AM -    Registration & Name Badge Pickup (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
5:00 PM
                                       Grand Ballroom

8:30 AM -
8:45 AM
8:45 AM -
9:05 AM
9:05 AM -
9:25 AM
9:25 AM -
9:45 AM
9:45 AM -
10: 10 AM
10:10 AM -
10:15 AM
10:15 AM -
10:40 AM
10:40 AM -
11:05 AM
11:05 AM -
11:30 AM
Plenary Session
Session Chairs: Douglas Grosse and Diana Bless, U.S. EPA/ORD/NRMRL
Greetings and Opening Remarks- Douglas Grosse, Conference Co-Chair, Senior Environmental
Engineer, National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL), Office of Research and
Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
EPA Region 6 Program and Priorities- Ron Curry, Regional Administrator, Region 6, U.S. EPA
Superfund Mine Site Challenges and Opportunities - Robin H. Richardson, Acting Director,
Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI), Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER), U.S. EPA
Scientific Assessments Informing Decisions: The Bristol Bay Assessment Example - Jeffrey
Frithsen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), ORD,
U.S. EPA
Break (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
Identifying Opportunities for the Sustainable Management of Rare Earth Element (REE)
Applications- Diana Bless, Chemical Engineer, NRMRL, ORD, U.S. EPA
EPA Report on Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water - Michele Mahoney, Soil
Scientist, OSRTI, OSWER, U.S. EPA
Partnering to Support Sustainable Mining -TerrenceChatwin, Ph.D., Technical Director, INAP
Dramatic Improvements at Margajita River, Pueblo Viejo Gold Mine, Dominican Republic -
Carlos Tamayo Lara, Ph.D., Environmental Manager, BarrickGold Corporation
11:30 AM
1:00 PM
Lunch (on your own)

-------
1:00 PM
1:30 PM
1:30 PM
2:00 PM
                       Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)
                            Characterization
                        Session Chair: Carol Russell,
                              U.S. EPA Region 8
Characterizing Mining-Related Contamination
in the Ocoee River, Tennessee - Thomas
Moyer, Ph.D., Black & Veatch Special Projects
Corporation
Application of Tracer Studies in Assessment
of Abandoned Mines - Curt Coover, COM
Smith
                                                 Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                                                     Source Control / Mine
                                                      Closure Approaches
                                                    Session Chair: Shahid Mahmud,
                                                       U.S. EPA/OSWER/OSRTI
Land Application of Biochemical Reactor
Effluent: An Innovative Method for
Mitigating Acid Rock Drainage - James Gusek,
Sovereign Consulting, Inc.
Dissolved Organic Carbon Augmentation: An
Innovative Tool for Managing Operational
and Closure-Phase Impacts from Mining on
Surface Water Resources - Charles Wisdom,
Ph.D., Geosyntec Consultants
2:00 PM
2:30 PM
The Continuing Evolution of Ground Water
Sampling Methods - Kent Cordry, Geolnsight,
Inc.
Influence of Pre-Mine Weathering and Rock
Type on TDS Release from Appalachian Coal
Mine Spoils - W. Lee Daniels, Ph.D., Virginia
Tech
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
3:OOPM
3:30 PM
 Break (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
                       Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)
                        Session Chair: Knsta McKim,
                              U.S. EPA Region 5
High Spatial and Temporal Resolution of
Contaminated Flows - Ian Sharp, FLUTe
                                                 Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                                                     Source Control / Mine
                                                  Closure Approaches (cont.)
                                                   Session Chair: John Hillenbrand,
                                                          U.S. EPA Region 9
Design Aspects of Mine Site Cover Systems -
Stephen Dwyer, Ph.D., Sandia National
Laboratories
3:30 PM
4:00 PM
Techniques for Successful Storm-Water
Monitoring in a Mining-Influenced Watershed
-Thomas McComb, Barge Waggoner Sumner
and Cannon, Inc.
Bio-mediated Soil Improvement Field Study
for Erosion Control and Site Restoration -
Christopher Hunt, Ph.D., Geosyntec
Consultants
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
Insights on Mine Site Characterization from
EPA's Optimization Review Initiative-Tom
Kady, U.S. EPA Environmental Response Team
Long-Term Results of Cover System
Monitoring in Semi-arid Western USA -
Monisha Banerjee, Ph.D., GeoSystems
Analysis, Inc.
5:OOPM
6:30 PM
 Poster Session
 (Roxy Room)

-------
Day 2 - Wednesday, August 13, 2014
7:30 AM -
5:00 PM
8:30 AM -
9:00 AM
9:00 AM -
9:30 AM
 Registration & Name Badge Pickup (Grand Ballroom Foyer)


          Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)            Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                         Session Chair: James Sickles,
                              U.S. EPA Region 9
Effective Field Techniques and Watershed
Modeling for Characterizing Mercury Loading
to Surface Water, Black Butte Mine
Superfund Site, Lane County, Oregon -
Howard Young, COM Smith
                                                     Session Chair: James Hanley,
                                                          U.S. EPA Region 8
The Economics of Water Treatment:
Conventional versus High Density Sludge
Precipitation - Mary Boardman, Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment
On the Problem of Hydraulic Characterization
of Gravelly Mine Waste and Cover System
Materials -Tzung-MowYao, Ph.D.,
GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.
9:30 AM -     Shaft Sampling and Profiling at the Section 27
10:00 AM      Mine - Cynthia Ardito, INTERA, Inc.
Alkaline Flush: An Emerging Technology for In
Situ Treatment of Mine Impacted Alluvial
Aquifers-Olufunsho Ogungbade, Freeport-
McMoRan
                                          Innovative Contaminant Removal from
                                          Mining Water with a Single Pass Advanced
                                          Treatment System-William Roper, Ph.D.,
                                          Micronic Technologies Corporation
 10:00 AM
 10:30 AM
 Break (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
                        Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)
                                                  Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
                         Session Chair: Mark Purcell,
                               U.S. EPA Region 6
Lessons Learned from Mining-Influenced
Waters Studies at the New Mexico Bureau of
Geology and Mineral Resources - Virginia
McLemore, Ph.D., New Mexico Bureau of
Geology and Mineral Resources
                                                      Session Chair: Gary Riley,
                                                          M.S. EPA Region 9
Biochemical Reactors for Treating Mining
Influenced Water - Douglas Bacon, State of
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
11:00 AM
11:30 AM
Assessing the Influence of Copper-Nickel-
Bearing Bedrocks on Baseline Water Quality
in Three Northeastern Minnesota
Watersheds- Perry Jones, U.S. Geological
Survey
Enhanced Sulfate Reduction Treatment of
Mining-Influenced  Water Using Biochemical
Reactors - Impacts on Mercury Speciation -
Stephen Dent, Ph.D., COM Smith
11:30 AM
12:00 PM
Evapotranspiration and Geochemical Controls
on Groundwater Plumes at Arid Sites:
Lessons from Archetype Uranium Milling
Sites- Brian Looney, Ph.D., Savannah River
National Laboratory
Biochemical Reactors for Passive Treatment
of Selenium - James Bays, CH2MHILL
 12:00 PM
 1:30 PM
 Lunch (on your own)

-------
1:30 PM
2:00 PM
                       Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)
                    Source Control / Mine Closure
                          Approaches (cont.)
                       Session Chair: Stephen Hoffman,
                              U.S. EPA/OSWER
                                                 Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                                                    Water Treatment (cont.)
                                                  Session Chair: Joy Jenkins, Ph.D.,
                                                          U.S. EPA Region 8
Strategy and Design Considerations for
Prioritization of Mine Waste Source Area
Remediation within the Headwaters of the
Tar Creek Watershed - Marc Schlebusch, COM
Smith
 Treatability Studies for Acidic Mining-
 Influenced Water - Angela Frandsen, COM
 Smith
2:00 PM
2:30 PM
Acid Rock Drainage Source Control and
Tailings Pile  Closure at the Elizabeth Mine
Superfund Site, Orange County, Vermont -
Andrew Boeckeler, Nobis Engineering, Inc.
 Innovative Biological and Molecular Tools
 Applied to Mine Waste Issues - Brady Lee,
 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
Passive Interflow Controls: An Approach to
Improve Best Management Practices for
Water Diversion at Abandoned Mine Sites -
Gary Hazen, COM Smith
 Electro-Biochemical Reactor Water
 Treatment Technology Demonstrates Low
 Selenium and Other Metal Effluents in
 Hardrock Mining Wastewaters - A. Ola
 Opara, Ph.D., Inotec, LLC
3:OOPM
3:30 PM
3:30 PM
4:00 PM
 Break (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
                        Track A (Regal/WurlitzerRoom)
            Source Control / Mine
         Closure Approaches (cont.)
            Session Chair: Carter Jessop,
                U.S. EPA Region 9
Advances in Groundwater Remediation and
Modeling for Mining-Related Contaminants -
Michael Truex, Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory
                                                 Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                                                                 Water Treatment (cont.)
                                                                Session Chair: Michele Mahoney,
                                                                     U.S. EPA/OSWER/OSRTI
| Iron Mountain Mine Superfund Site - Long
 Term O&M Challenges - James Sickles, U.S.
 EPA Region 9
4:00 PM -     Hydrologic and Water-Quality Effects of the
4:30 PM       Dinero Tunnel Bulkhead, Sugar Loaf Mining
              District, Near Leadville, Colorado:
              Implications for Monitoring Remediation -
              Katherine Walton-Day, Ph.D., U.S. Geological
              Survey
                                          Characterization and Remediation of Iron(lll)
                                          Oxide-Rich Scale in a Pipeline Carrying Acid
                                          Mine Drainage at Iron Mountain Mine,
                                          California, U.S.A. - Kate Campbell, Ph.D.,
                                          U.S. Geological Survey
4:30 PM -     In-Situ Nitrate and Selenium
5:00 PM       Reduction/Stabilization within Coal Waste
              Rock: Bench-Scale Evaluation - A. Ola Opara,
              Ph.D., Inotec, LLC
                                          Tackling AMD, Mining Impacted
                                          Groundwater and Private Mine Ownership in
                                          a Superfund Site that Spans the Panhandle of
                                          Idaho- Ed Moreen, U.S. EPA

-------
Day 3 - Thursday, August 14, 2014
7:30 AM -
12:00 PM
 Registration & Name Badge Pickup (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
8:00 AM
8:30 AM
                        Track A (Regal/Wurlitzer Room)
                              Beneficial Use
                         Session Chair: Scott Jacobs,
                            U.S. EPA/ORD/NRMRL
Extraction of Useful Resources from Mining-
Influenced Water (MIW) - Kate Campbell,
Ph.D., U.S. Geological Survey
                                                 Track B (Ambassador/Registry Room)
                                                    Prediction and Modeling
                                                    Session Chair: Robert Weber,
                                                           U.S. EPA/ORD
 Approach for Estimating a Probable Range of
 Pit Lake Concentrations for Mine Pits with
 Sulfide Wall Rock-Steven Lange, Knight
 Piesold and Co.
8:30 AM
9:00 AM
Large-Scale Treatment of Agricultural
Effluents Using Mine Drainage Residuals-
Philip Sibrell, U.S. Geological Survey
 Assessing Potential Impacts from
 Underground Mine Dewatering in the Gallup,
 Dakota, and Westwater Canyon Aquifers
 with a Basin-Wide Groundwater Flow Model
 -John Sigda, Ph.D., INTERA, Inc.
9:00 AM -
9:30 AM
Jordan River & Midvale Slag Superfund Site-
Beneficial Use- Marian Hubbard, Salt Lake
County Watershed Planning and Restoration
 Contaminated Sediment Fate and Transport
 Model in the Tri-State Mining District -
| Douglas Grosse, U.S. EPA/ORD/NRMRL
9:30 AM-
10:00 AM
 Break (Grand Ballroom Foyer)
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
                                                    Grand Ballroom
                                                  Closing Session
                                    Session Chair: Douglas Grosse, U.S. EPA/ORD/NRMRL
A Semi-Passive Bioreactor for Treatment of a Sulfate and Metals Contaminated Well Field,
Nacimiento Mine, New Mexico - Timothy Tsukamoto, Ph.D, TKT Consulting, LLC
10:30 AM
11:45 AM
Panel Discussion
11:45 AM
12:00 PM

Closing Remarks
 12:30 PM
 5:00 PM
Optional Post-Conference Field Trip to the Nacimiento Copper Mine

-------
Poster Presentations

Characterization

    1.  Using ICP Spectrometry Data and Alkalinity Results for Effective Screening of Acidity Samples to
       Improve Laboratory Efficiency - Curtis Callahan, U.S. EPA Region 4
    2.  Applying Exploration Geophysical Methods to Mine Waters - Jennifer Hare, Ph.D., Zonge International,
       Inc.
    3.  Evaluation of DGT Samplers for Monitoring Mining-Influenced Water - Curt Coover, COM Smith
    4.  Environmental Site Investigations under the Chino Administrative Order on Consent - Matt Schultz,
       New Mexico Environment Department

Water Treatment

    5.  Column Study Treatability Testing for In Situ Remediation of Mining-Influenced Water - Nicholas
       Anton, COM Smith
    6.  Biochemical Reactors for Treating Mining Influenced Water - David Gates, Oklahoma Department of
       Environmental Quality
    7.  Subsurface Barriers and Innovative Geochemistry: Reducing Contaminant Concentrations in
       Groundwater and Contaminant Discharges to Fourmile Branch at the Savannah River Site, South
       Carolina - Carol Eddy-Dilek, Savannah River National Laboratory
    8.  Stewardship Concepts for Management of Hard Rock Mining Wastewaters - John McKernan, U.S. EPA,
       Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory
    9.  Wastewater Treatment of High Total Dissolved Solids and Acidity at the Cerro de Pasco Mine Site -
       Melissa Rhodes, Golder Associates, Inc.

Source Control/Mine Closure Approaches

    10. Use of Biochars Produced by Gasification of Grass and Wood in the Remediation of Two Acid Mine
       Soils of Western Oregon - Stephen Griffith, USDA ARS
    11. Investigating Biochar as a Tool for Mine Soil Remediation - Mark Johnson, Ph.D., U.S. EPA, Office of
       Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
    12. Mechanistic Understanding of Biogeochemical Transformations of Trace Elements in Contaminated
       Mine Waste Materials under Reduced Conditions- Ranju Rani Kama, Kansas State University
    13. Biochar for Remediation of Solid Source Mine Wastes and Mine Drainage Treatment - Christopher
       Peltz, Research Services LLC

Beneficial Use

    14. Chemical Safety and Sustainability of Rare Earth Elements: Selection of a Product System for a LCA
       Case Study- Diana Bless, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management
       Research Laboratory
    15. Thermal and Hydrological Characterization of an Abandoned Mine Complex for Low-Enthalpy
       Geothermal Extraction: The Corning Mine Complex, Perry County, Ohio - Joshua Richardson, Ohio
       University

Prediction and Modeling

    16. Predicting Water Quality for a High Altitude Mine Waste Facility in Peru - Dawn Kaback, Ph.D., AMEC
       Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.

-------
Exhibits

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Engineering Technical Support Center (ETSC) - Douglas Grosse,
       U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Technology Innovation and Field Services Division (TIFSD) -
       Michele Mahoney, U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Superfund
       Remediation and Technology Innovation


Organic Substrates for Biochemical Reactors - Michael Sieczkowski, JRW Bioremediation, LLC


ACZ Laboratories Inc. - Michael McDonough, ACZ Laboratories Inc.


Flexible Liner Underground Technologies (FLUTe) - Ian Sharp, FLUTe


COM Smith Summary of Presentations - Gunnar Emilsson, COM Smith

-------
Presentation Abstracts
         and
     Speaker Bios
         Aiicmst 12. 2014

-------
                           Plenary Session
CONFERENCE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION

Douglas W. Grosse
Conference Co-Chair, Senior Environmental Engineer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk
Management Research Laboratory
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268
Phone: 513-569-7844; Email: grosse.douglas@epa.gov

Bio:
Douglas  W.  Grosse has  a B.A. in English  literature  from  Ohio  University and  an M.S.  in
environmental engineering from the  University of Cincinnati. He has worked as an Environmental
Engineer at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  in Cincinnati, Ohio  for the past 35
years. Mr. Grosse is currently working  in EPA's  National  Risk Management Research Laboratory
(NRMRL) as a Senior Environmental Engineer. Past experiences have included: in-house research at
EPA's  pilot plant facilities in wastewater and  hazardous waste research; pilot facility manager and
project  officer  (Center  Hill Laboratory);  Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program; RCRA corrective action coordinator and technical assistance in Superfund, RCRA and
treatability study assistance, as  an aqueous treatment specialist, Acting Branch  Chief, Technology
Transfer Branch, and ETV/AMS Center PO. Currently, Mr. Grosse is working in the Remediation
and  Redevelopment Branch and  Engineering Technical  Support Center,  as  a specialist in site
remediation and technical support.

EPA REGION 6 PROGRAM AND PRIORITIES

Ron Curry
Regional Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, South Central Region (Region 6)
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202
Phone: 214-665-2100; Email: curry.ron(g),epa.gov

Bio:
Ron Curry was appointed  as U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency (EPA) Region  6  Regional
Administrator in September 2012. He has more than 36 years of management experience in local,
state and federal government, as well as  the private sector. As Regional Administrator, Curry directs
federal environmental programs for the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,  Oklahoma,
Texas and 66 Tribes. He oversees an annual  budget of $471 million and 778 employees  located in
Dallas, Houston, El Paso and other field assignments. Since joining EPA, Curry has taken a number
of significant actions:

    State Partnership: Since becoming the permitting authority for greenhouse gases (GHG) in Texas, EPA
    has worked closely with  business and the Texas Commission on Environmental  Quality (TCEQ)  to
    operate  one of the largest  GHG  permitting programs in the  country.  EPA has received over  85
    applications for Texas-based industries to  meet the Clean Air Act requirements. With the  passage  of
    authorizing legislation, TCEQ  is seeking authorization to  run the federally delegated GHG permitting
    program. EPA and TCEQ worked together to develop an innovative work-share program for processing
                                            11

-------
    applications. EPA and TCEQ are simultaneously processing the state's request for program authorization
    in order to streamline some portions of the process without jeopardizing public participation.

    Safe  Drinking Water: EPA proposed state primacy on three new drinking water rules  in Oklahoma.
    EPA implemented these rules in Oklahoma while the state secured additional funding and adopted all
    three new drinking water regulations. EPA is working with the state to smoothly transition procedures
    and responsibilities so the state can readily implement the rules.

    Enforcement and  Compliance:  The  Region  continues to  lead  the  nation  in the number  of
    administrative and judicial  enforcement actions. This year the  region expanded  information sharing by
    posting administrative and non-penalty enforcement actions on its public website and is expanding the
    program to include inspection reports.

    Air  Quality: The  New  Mexico  Environmental  Improvement Board  unanimously  approved  a
    collaboration by EPA, the New Mexico Environment Department, PNM Resources and environmental
    stakeholders on  a  plan for the San Juan Generating Station to meet the requirements of the Regional
    Haze Rule. The  plan will cut over  80 percent of  pollution from  the plant and improve visibility in 16
    parks in the southwest. Additionally, there  is a balanced cost advantage to customers and a significant
    environmental benefit for years to come.

    Clean Water: EPA coordinated closely with Arkansas officials to address implications of a recently-
    passed state law  (Act 954). The law  negated some existing state water quality standards, TMDLs, and
    discharge limits  in permits and  enforcement orders for minerals, jeopardizing the State's ability to
    implement its NPDES program. Because  EPA successfully communicated the  potential impacts, the
    Arkansas state legislature reversed the legislation.

    Environmental  Justice: A federal judge approved a buyout plan  as part of an agreement with EPA to
    extend the city's deadline to finish its  sewer system upgrades. The City of Baton Rouge agreed to buy out
    and relocate residents of a low-income neighborhood potentially impacted by the city's planned sewer
    system expansion. About 44 families will directly benefit from this effort.

In  addition,  Curry  has  supported  environmental  justice   (EJ)  community-based grass  roots
organizations with an EJ training workshop in Albuquerque and New Orleans. The workshops help
us to:  1) better understand today's environmental justice challenges; 2)  exchange strategies, lessons
learned and best practices  that lead to healthier communities; and 3) participate in a collaborative
process to draft a Region 6 EJ Action Plan that addresses region-wide priorities.

Curry  worked  with  the   University  of  New   Mexico   on   the   development  of   their
Energy/Water/Environment Nexus Studies  program. Prior to that, he spent eight years serving in
former New Mexico  Governor  Bill Richardson's  administration  as cabinet  secretary  of  the
Environment Department and  Natural Resource Trustee.  In  the position as secretary, he oversaw
the regulation  of the Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories  and the implementation of
standards to protect the air, water and land of New Mexico. He also led the Governor's initiative to
join the  Western Climate  Initiative and led the climate  change implementation  state team in New
Mexico.  He  developed the Environmental Justice Executive  Order signed in November  2005  by
Governor  Richardson.  As trustee, he successfully negotiated a  $13 million ground water consent
decree in 2010.

He has extensive experience working closely with EPA, the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S.
Department  of Defense, as well as industry.  He also served as administrator for the Village  of Los
Ranches and as a city manager in Santa Fe.
                                              12

-------
Earlier in his career, Curry was a senior public affairs specialist for Gram Inc. and worked on a site-
wide environmental impact statement for Los Alamos National Laboratory; and vice president of
CEI Enterprises,  a manufacturing firm. He has over 20 years  of experience in private business
including 10 years owning a small business franchise started with his father. His interest in the
environment grew during his manufacturing career while marketing products into the South Coast
Air Quality District in California. He brings to EPA a keen understanding of federal environmental
regulations impacts on business owners and entrepreneurs as well as state and local governments.

SUPERFUND MINE SITE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Robin H. Richardson
Acting Director
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9048; Email: richardson.robinh(g),epa.gov

Bio:
Robin  Richardson is the Acting Officer Director for the Office  of Superfund Remediation and
Technology Innovation, which manages the national Superfund Remedial Program. Robin has more
than 20 years'  experience working in the Superfund program.  She started her Superfund career in
1987 as a consultant to  the Superfund Response program providing information technology, and
program and  resource management support. Robin joined  EPA's  Office  of  Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response in  1989 as an analyst
working closely with the regions in implementing the Superfund program. Since then Robin has held
many positions, both public and private sector, supporting the  Superfund program. In January 2010,
Robin  became the Director of the Superfund Remedial Program's Resources Management Division
responsible for managing the Superfund Remedial budget, information technology and acquisition
functions. She has a degree in international studies from Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa and has
completed graduate work in public administration at the George Washington University.

SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENTS INFORMING DECISIONS: THE BRISTOL BAY
ASSESSMENT EXAMPLE

Jeffrey B. Frithsen, Ph.D.
Senior  Scientist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and  Development, National Center for
Environmental Assessment
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, MC: 8623P, Washington, DC  20460
Phone: 703-347-8623; Email: frithsen.jeff@,epa.gov

Bio:
Jeff Frithsen is a Senior Scientist and Special Projects Coordinator within the U.S. EPA's Office of
Research and  Development  (ORD).  His work  has  focused  on  developing  agency scientific
assessments that  directly  inform  environmental  management  and  policy   decisions.  Those
assessments span both  ecological  and  human  health  topics.  Ecological assessment  topics
coordinated by Dr. Frithsen  include the U.S. EPA's assessment of mountaintop mining and valley
fill  practices, and the agency's report to Congress  providing an assessment of  the environmental
consequences  of  the  increased  use  of biofuels. Dr.  Frithsen was also  co-lead  for the Agency's
assessment of  Bristol Bay Alaska, a study designed to evaluate the potential impacts of proposed
                                            13

-------
future  large-scale  mining on a  world class  fishery.  Human health assessment  topics include
evaluation of the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study, characterization of PCB exposures
to inform agency guidance concerning PCBs in schools, and the development of tools and  databases
supporting the conduct of human  exposure  assessments. Dr. Frithsen assisted with  coordinating
ORD's response to the BP Deepwater Horizon Gulf oil spill so as  to address both ecological and
human exposure and health issues.  Dr. Frithsen is  currently  coordinating the development of the
agency's oil and gas hydraulic fracturing drinking water assessment report.

Dr. Frithsen  has worked for the  U.S. EPA since 1998, holding a variety of positions within the
Office of Research and Development. Dr. Frithsen's academic background includes formal studies
at the University of Cambridge, the University of Exeter, and the Harvard  School of Public Health.
He was awarded a B.S. in biology from Boston College, and a Ph.D. in  oceanography from the
University  of Rhode Island. He  was awarded an  environmental fellowship with the American
Association for the Advancement  of Science. He describes himself as a displaced New Englander, a
sometimes  cyclist, and a passionate sailor who is still learning the ropes and yearning for calm seas
and a following wind.

IDENTIFYING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF
RARE EARTH ELEMENT (REE) APPLICATIONS

Diana Bless1 (presenting author}, David Meyer and Michael Gonzalez
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk
    Management Research Laboratory
26 W. Martin Luther  King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268
^hone: 513-569-7674; Email: bless.diana(g),epa.gov

Abstract:
The two major markets for Rare  Earth Elements (REEs) that have  received significant attention in
the area of sustainable materials research are the consumer electronics and information technologies
and energy-related technologies. The interest in consumer electronics and information technologies
is  largely based on concerns  for  both  supply issues and environmental impacts during end-of-life
(EOL) activities. Both of these  issues can be  addressed using sustainable  materials  management
(SMM) practices. The  U.S. EPA's Chemical Safety  for Sustainability research program is applying
SMM tools such as  material flow  analysis,  life cycle  assessment (LCA), and  sustainable process
design to selected REE product systems to better understand how these tools can be  improved to
meet the needs of  decision makers seeking to  improve the sustainability of these products. A cross-
Agency work group  was assembled and identified  relevant issues  or questions related to energy
critical elements/rare earth elements that should be included when considering sustainable materials
management. A literature review was used to identify data gaps related to these issues as they pertain
to mining, use and potential recovery of REEs for a range of products, including magnets, batteries,
and phosphors used in consumer electronics. Recent advances  in mining technologies need to be
evaluated to better understand their impacts and cost implications  (if any)  on the consumer product
markets.  A major  concern for most of the  recovery  processes is  the need to isolate  the REE-
containing  portions of the products  (i.e., separate the HDDs from  computers). This can be time-
consuming and has proven to be challenging when REEs occur in  low concentrations in e-waste.
Furthermore,  most  recycling technologies  are still  in  their development stage with  limited
commercial scale deployment. The results from the  literature  review will be  used to perform a life
cycle assessment of a key consumer electronic product to determine how potential SMM  strategies
such as sustainable mining, recycling, reuse, and substitution alter the life cycle impacts. The impact
                                            14

-------
data will inform  the use  of EPA's  GREENSCOPE sustainable  process  evaluation and design
methodology to identify improvements for proposed technologies within the life cycle.

Bio:
Diana Bless is a  staff member of EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory in the
Office of Research and Development. Diana is a Chemical Engineer with 24 years  of experience
within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. She has conducted research for the prevention
and clean-up of toxic/hazardous waste. Her research interests have focused on current and future
approaches related to characterization, source control and treatment of mining-influenced waters as
they impact  aquatic ecosystems. She  holds a B.S.  in  chemical engineering with a minor in
biochemical engineering from New Mexico State University. She currently works for the Sustainable
Technology Division under the Systems Analysis Branch, but sometimes interfaces with the Land
Remediation  and Pollution  Control Division for specific  mining  activities. More  recently, her
research  emphasis is on sustainable materials management for rare  earth elements in consumer
electronics. As a  Task  Lead for Chemical Safety  and Sustainability (CSS) Task 5.1.2, she manages
case studies that involve Life Cycle Assessment for plastics in electronic products, contaminants of
emerging concerns from surface waters,  rare  earth elements  (REEs)  from electronic wastes,
nanoremediation  and  nanotechnology.  She  is also an alternate Contracts Officer  Representative
(COR) for several projects/duties and has been a Project Officer for other projects in the past.

EPA REPORT ON TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINING-INFLUENCED
WATER

Michele Mahoney
Soil Scientist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Mail Code: 5203P, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9057; Email: mahoney.michele@epa.gov

Abstract:
This presentation showcases information in a  2014 EPA  technology report  on  select mining-
influenced water  (MIW) treatment technologies used  or piloted as part of remediation efforts at
mine sites. The report provides information on treatment technologies for MP\V to  federal, state and
local regulators, site owners and operators, consultants, and  other stakeholders. The technologies
described in this  report are applicable  to treatment of water from both coal and hard-rock  mine
operations. The  report provides  short descriptions of treatment technologies  and  presents
information on the contaminants treated, pre-treatment requirements, long-term maintenance needs,
performance and  costs. Sample sites illustrate considerations associated with selecting a technology.
Website links and sources for more information on each topic are also included.

EPA  is  evaluating  more cost-effective and  lower-maintenance  treatment  systems to decrease the
costs  and improve the efficiency of mine  site  cleanups. Hence, this report focuses on passive
treatment methods, but also includes recently  developed or not widely utilized  active treatment
systems  and  passive-active  hybrid  systems.  The  report does  not  include  all  traditional  active
technologies, such as lime precipitation or high-density sludge systems.

In recent years,  development and implementation  of passive systems has  increased.  However,
additional pilot studies and  case  studies  are needed  to assess their effectiveness.  With time,  EPA
expects that the pool of technology options will expand and  shift  away from high-energy-use, high-
maintenance systems to low-energy-use, low-maintenance systems.
                                            15

-------
In presenting this information at the National Hardrock Mining Conference, EPA hopes to network
with other professionals who are studying and using lower-maintenance and innovative technologies
for treating mining-influenced waters.

Bio:
Michele Mahoney works  on contaminated  site  remediation and reuse  within  EPA's  Superfund
program. She provides support to practitioners on the use of soil amendments for remediation and
redevelopment/reuse, ecological revitalization, terrestrial carbon sequestration, and urban gardening.
She also researches and compiles information on mining site remediation technology and land reuse.
Michele recently led the development of a resource guide on treatment technologies for mining
influenced  water.   Michele   manages    content   development   for   both    the Cluin.org
EcoTools and Mining pages. Michele has worked with EPA for over 14 years. Prior to her current
responsibilities, Michele served the Agency as the lead for food waste composting issues and as an
environmental fate and ecological risk assessor for pesticide registration.

PARTNERING TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE MINING

TerrenceD. Chatwin, Ph.D.
Technical Director
INAP
2105 Oneida Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84109
Phone: 801-485-2279; Email: tchatwin@inap.com.au

Abstract:
This presentation will identify INAP  (International Network for Acid Prevention) and describe how
this mining  company network is partnering with other mining stakeholders to support sustainable
mining. The key element to  our  sustainable mining program is the GARD Guide, an international
best practice guide for the prevention of acid-rock, neutral and saline drainage.

Since the GARD  Guide  was rolled out in  2009,  it has become accepted as a major guidance
document for the  prevention and mitigation of mine-influenced waters  and is used by a diverse
collection of mining stakeholders ranging  from mining companies to  regulators,  academics  and
communities to support sustainable mining. The presentation will include examples of  its application
in a multitude  of climatic and  geologic conditions,  and will illustrate how INAP and  its  Global
Alliance  partners are  building   stakeholder  capacity in  developing regions including some new
activities to enhance our educational tools.

Bio:
Dr. Terrence Chatwin is  the Technical Director of International  Network for Acid Prevention
(INAP), where he participated  in the development and  publication of  the GARD Guide, a best
practice guide for the prevention of acid rock drainage (ARD). He also organized INAP workshops
and  short courses and directed the operation  of INAP's programs. He has over 40 years of
experience in  the  mining and  minerals industries in research,  development and management of
process engineering and  environmental projects.  He  has worked  for  mining companies  and
consulting firms, as well as the University of Utah, where he was Director of the Utah Engineering
Experiment Station  for 10  years. He  has  a B.S.  in mechanical engineering from  Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. from the University of Utah in metallurgy.
                                            16

-------
DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENTS AT MARGAJITA RIVER, PUEBLO VIEJO GOLD
MINE, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

Carlos E. Tamayo Lara, Ph.D., M.B.A., P.E.
Environmental Manager
Barrick Gold Corporation — Pueblo Viejo
#29, Lope De Vega Ave. Naco, Santo Domingo, 10124, Dominican Republic
Phone: 809-331-7878; Email: ctamayo@,bamck.com

Abstract:
The Margajita River is about  six  kilometers long,  skirting  Barrick's  Pueblo Viejo mine before
winding its way into  Hatillo reservoir, one of the largest fresh  water bodies in Dominican Republic
(DR). As far back as most people in the  communities could remember the waters of the Margajita
River were colored a  dark, ominous red — a product of acid rock drainage (ARD) from the old waste
rock dumps and  facilities  from  previous  State-owned operator Rosario Dominicana. The  local
inhabitants called it 'blood'  river. For decades, the stream was  highly acidic (pH below 3) and metal
concentrations exceeded DR quality standards by orders of magnitude.

Pueblo Viejo Dominicana Corporation (PVDC)  started commercial operations at this gold mine in
2013. Barrick Gold Corporation (operator) holds a 60 percent interest while Goldcorp holds 40
percent interest.  Barrick PVDC  efforts  to clean  up  the Margajita water were  an  extraordinary
challenge.

PVDC spent a lot of effort to clean up this brownfield site and implement best industry practices.
Prior to final discharge into Margajita, reused ARD process water is treated at the onsite Effluent
Treatment Plant  (ETP). Approximately 40,000 cubic meters of water is treated daily. ETP operation
has helped to bring  dramatic improvements in  the Margajita  River.  Communities  can see now the
evident and extraordinary results of better quality water and fishing.

Also, PVDC has committed $75 million to fund remediation of historical environmental  liability that
belongs to DR State.

Bio:
Dr. Carlos  Tamayo Lara is the Environmental Manager for Barrick Gold Corporation at  the Pueblo
Viejo Gold mine in Dominican Republic. He is in  charge of environmental compliance at this new
mining operation as  well as he leads the support  for  the environmental remediation of historical
liabilities from this brownfield mining site.  Carlos has more than 30 years of experience in mining,
consulting   business   and  academics.  Carlos'  skills  include  civil   engineering,  hydrogeology,
environmental management systems, remediation programs,  hazardous waste  management  and
biodiversity programs. He has work experience in the USA, Mexico and different countries in Latin
America and he is an  author/co-author of several water publications.

Carlos earned a  bachelor's  degree  in science from  the  University  of Yucatan, Mexico and later
earned both a master's and doctoral degrees in  civil engineering, with emphasis on environmental,
surface and groundwater hydrology from Colorado State  University. He also holds a Global MBA
from the Thunderbird School of Global Management in Phoenix, Arizona.
                                             17

-------
               Session 1:  Characterization
CHARACTERIZING MINING-RELATED CONTAMINATION IN THE OCOEE
RIVER, TENNESSEE

Thomas Moyei* (presenting author), James Eldridge2, Craig Zeller3 and Brian Striggow4
'Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp., 11360 W. 60th Avenue, Arvada, CO 80004
   Phone: 720-984-4146; Email: moYertc@bv.com
2Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp., 16932 NE Woodmville-Redmond Road, Suite A203
   Woodmville, WA 98072; Phone: 206-852-4168; Email: eldndgejc@bv.com
3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Remedial Branch
   61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, GA 30303; Phone: 404-562-8827; Email: 2eller.craig@epa.gov
4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support Division
   980 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605
   Phone: 706-355-8619; Email: striggow.brian@epa.gov

Abstract:
For nearly 150 years beginning in the mid-1800s, the Ocoee River, southeastern Tennessee, was the
receiving water for acid mine drainage, mine wastes, and soil discharged to or eroded from the
Copper  Basin Mining District. EPA designated 26 miles of the river including flowing reaches and
two reservoirs as Operable Unit 5 (OU5) of the Copper Basin  Superfund Alternative Site. EPA
completed a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study of the river in 2009 and issued a Record of
Decision for OU5 in 2011.

Mining-related wastes  in the Ocoee River originated  from two  tributary watersheds that hosted
underground  copper mines  and facilities for ore processing and chemical manufacturing.  Wastes
identified in the river include granulated and pot slag, iron calcine, sulfide-rich waste rock, and debris
from demolished chemical production facilities. The river also received various effluent discharges,
both treated  and  untreated,  from a variety of manufacturing processes. Severe erosion  of the
historically denuded watersheds drastically altered the morphology of the creeks and Ocoee River as
large volumes of sediment were  deposited downstream; the river gradient was further modified by
dam construction. Metals, pH and sedimentation adversely impacted the aquatic  ecosystem.

Characterizing contamination and risks to aquatic life in the Ocoee River posed many challenges not
the least of which was the length and diversity of the affected reach. Other factors included poor
cross-channel mixing of the water column; management of river flows and reservoir levels for power
generation and recreational use; the substantial volume of sediment present in the river channel, as
emergent bars, and as  deltas at  reservoir inlets; ongoing remediation of the tributary watersheds,
which significantly  changed river water quality during the study period;  and  complex contaminant
transport mechanisms.

This presentation will  discuss  the approach taken to characterizing the Ocoee  River including the
use of conceptual  site  models (CSM), targeted investigations, and unique sampling strategies to
provide data to support risk assessment and remedial  alternatives development.
                                           18

-------
Initial CSMs for flowing river reaches and reservoirs guided development of data quality objectives
and sampling approaches. These models were refined as data collection increased our understanding
of contaminant release mechanisms and exposure pathways.

Focused  investigations were developed to address  critical  data needs such  as chemical exchange
between  river water and  contaminated  sediment,  a  major risk  driver. Various  characterization
techniques were employed: within the river channel,  sediment pore water samples collected using
temporary well points were co-located with surface water samples collected at various points in the
water column. Piezometers installed on emergent  sediment bars tracked the movement of  river
water into and out of sediment in response to managed fluctuations in flow.  Wells installed in the
Parksville sediment delta were sampled through an annual reservoir drawdown  cycle and sondes
were deployed to measure field parameters in reservoir water off the delta toe as reservoir pool was
lowered.

Other unique sampling strategies included size fractional chemistry of sieved sediment samples, the
collection of sediment cores using boat-mounted and hand-held vibracore equipment, and seasonal
sampling of  reservoir pools. Potential bioavailability was assessed  by  combining  the  results  of
surface water, interstitial pore water, and sediment toxicity tests with sequential extraction and acid
volatile  sulfide/simultaneously extracted  metals analysis of sediment from various  depositional
environments.

Bio:
Tom Moyer is a Senior Geologist and Task Order Manager with Black & Veatch Special Projects
Corp. He has worked on mining environmental issues in EPA Regions 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 under
CERCLA, CWA and NEPA authorities.  For EPA, Tom  has designed and  conducted studies  to
characterize multi-media contamination at mine sites, which include the Copper Basin, TN; Ore
Knob, NC; Brewer Gold, SC; Barite Hill,  SC; and Madison Mine, MO. For the U.S. Forest Service
he designed investigations at the Bluebird & Blackjack Mines, OR. Tom has been the primary author
of numerous RI and EE/CA reports and has contributed to FS reports, Proposed Plans, RODs and
EISs. In previous  years, Tom  supported the U.S.  Geological Survey's and U.S. Department  of
Energy's  efforts  to characterize tuff deposits at Yucca Mountain. Tom is a  member of the  Acid
Drainage Technology Initiative, NWGA, GSA and AGU. He has  a Ph.D. in geology from Arizona
State University.

APPLICATION OF TRACER STUDIES IN ASSESSMENT OF ABANDONED MINES

Mark Nelson, P.G/and Curt Coover, P.G.2
COM Smith
'12445 Misty Meadow Road, Nemo, SD 57759
   Phone: 605-578-9739; Email: nelsonmr(g),cdmsmith.com
250 W. 14th Street, Helena, MT 59601
   Phone: 406-441-1400; Email: coovercafSjcdmsmith.com

Abstract:
Tracer studies are hydrologic investigation tools that have broad application in assessment of mine
drainage  systems, which adversely affect water quality in thousands of streams nationwide. Mining-
influenced water (MIW)  is produced when surface water or groundwater interact with mineralized
rock and is transported  either  in the  subsurface or  on the  surface toward springs or streams.
Although direct discharge  of MIW  from draining adits  to surface water is observed  at  some
abandoned underground mines,  transport  pathways  involved in  formation and discharge of MIW
                                            19

-------
are often complex, and may include subsurface transport via porous media flow, fracture flow and
pipe flow.  Tracer testing provides an  opportunity to  evaluate a  MIW  flow  system empirically,
enabling more detailed assessment of MIW generation processes, contaminant transport pathways,
and effects to surface water quality. Recent tracer tests at two abandoned mine sites in the western
United States are reviewed to illustrate  tracer testing approaches used by  CDM Smith to  improve
characterization, management and remediation of abandoned mines.

The Tiger Mine in Judith Basin County, Montana is an abandoned underground lead-silver mine that
contributes to severe impairment of surface water quality in Galena Creek through discharge of
water from mine  adits. Tracer testing was conducted to characterize infiltration pathways into the
underground mine  workings, and to  support assessment  of potential  technologies that could
decrease infiltration into the mine.  The geometry of the underground mine was evaluated based on
surface mapping and compilation of historical mine maps. This information was incorporated into a
conceptual  model that described  the  hydrogeological framework,  including points of potential
infiltration of water into the underground mine  flow system. Three different fluorescent tracers were
deployed: Eosine, Fluorescein and Rhodamine  WT. The tracers were deployed at two mine shafts
and in  Galena Creek, and were monitored using activated charcoal samplers and surface water
samples. The results  provided empirical  evidence  of a  direct  hydraulic connection  between
hypothesized points of infiltration and observed discharges,  supporting assessment  of potential
approaches to reduce infiltration into the abandoned mines.

The Blue Ledge Mine is an abandoned underground copper mine located in the Siskiyou Mountains
of northern California. Several miles of Joe  Creek are adversely affected by MIW discharges from
the Blue Ledge Mine. The site conceptual model included several draining adits, and indicated that
discharge of MIW from the adits was a primary contributor to poor water quality in Joe Creek. MIW
discharge from groundwater to surface water  was also identified  as a potential contributor to
observed effects in Joe Creek, and a tracer test was designed to evaluate the relative importance of
dispersed inflows of MIW  from groundwater  in overall  contaminant loading  to Joe Creek.  The
tracer test involved  adding  a  calcium bromide tracer to the stream at  a known rate, monitoring
dilution of the tracer as it flowed  downstream, and collecting numerous surface water samples for
analysis of metals and major ions. Changes in the load of mining-related contaminants in Joe Creek
were calculated based on contaminant concentrations and stream flows, which were measured using
the tracer-dilution method. The  results of the  tracer test demonstrated that dispersed discharge of
MIW from groundwater to surface water is an important contributor to poor water quality in Joe
Creek, and  that  remediation  of the  adit discharges  alone  would  not be expected  to result in
compliance with surface water quality standards.

Bio:
Mark Nelson has  26  years  of  professional  experience focused on mine  hydrogeology  and
environmental geochemistry, mine  permitting and regulation, exploration and mining geology, and
mine  reclamation. Mr. Nelson holds  a M.Sc.  degree in geology and geological engineering from
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and a B.Sc. degree in geology from The Ohio State
University. Mr. Nelson is a Certified Professional Geologist with American Institute  of Professional
Geologists and is a Registered Professional Geologist in several western states.
                                             20

-------
THE CONTINUING EVOLUTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLING METHODS

Kent Cordry
President
Geolnsight, Inc.
P.O. Box 1266, Mesilla Park, NM 88011
Phone: 575-523-5799; Email: kentcordry@aol.com

Abstract:
The potential of ground water contamination occurring from past and ongoing mining operations
has resulted in substantial investment in ground water monitoring networks and the associated long-
term ground water sampling programs.

Over the past three decades we have  seen a gradual evolution of ground water sampling methods,
beginning with fixed volume purging in the  early 1980s, the transition to low-flow sampling
beginning in  the  early 1990s and most recently, the increased acceptance of no-purge (stressless)
ground water sampling methods as a viable alternative to both of the prior sampling methods.

No-Purge (stressless) ground water  sampling began to gain acceptance in the mid-2000s and  has
seen a sustained increase in use since  then. Part of its growth can be attributed to the capacity to
collect a formation  quality ground water sample  without generating a  large volume of purge
water.. .with a 50 to 80 percent reduction in sample collection time and expense. An added bonus is
increased site  safety due to the reduction or elimination of purge water and lack of heavy equipment
(generators, pumps, compressors, drums  and tanks) needed to  collect  the ground water samples
using purge and often low-flow techniques.

The first portion of the presentation will  look at the historical evolution of ground water sampling
methods, describe the basic procedures used  to collect the samples with each method, and examine
the advantages and limitations of each method. The latter part will focus on no-purge (stressless)
ground water sampling methods and discuss in greater detail the classes of no-purge devices,  how
they work and the advantages and limitations of this ground water sampling method.

Bio:
Kent Cordry  has  been active in the ground-water monitoring field for over  30 years.  He is  the
founder and   president of  Geolnsight;  a  company  established  in  1991 that  focused  on  the
development  and  production of innovative  direct-push  equipment.  In 1996,  he  received  the
National Groundwater Association Technology Award for major contributions to the groundwater
industry related to direct push groundwater  sampling. In the summer of 1999, Mr.  Cordry began
development  of the  HydraSleeve no-purge (passive) groundwater sampler and has  since received
two patents  for  the  invention.  In  total  he  holds  10  patents, including  those   covering  the
HydroPunch  I, HydroPunch  II and the HydraSleeve. For the last 15 years Mr.  Cordry has been
teaching classroom, field and online courses pertaining to  direct push  methods and ground water
sampling.

Prior to starting Geolnsight, Mr.  Cordry  spent 10 years as an environmental consultant, serving as
project manager/senior hydrogeologist, managing site assessments  throughout the United  States.
Mr. Cordry also served as a division manager for a  Midwestern drilling company. He is a Certified
Professional Geologist and Certified Drilling  Contractor. Kent has a B.S. in geology from Southeast
Missouri State University.
                                            21

-------
                  Session 2: Source Control /
                   Mine Closure Approaches
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOCHEMICAL REACTOR EFFLUENT:  AN
INNOVATIVE METHOD FOR MITIGATING ACID ROCK DRAINAGE

James J. Gusek, P.E.
Sovereign Consulting, Inc.
12687 W. Cedar Drive, #305, Lakewood, CO 80228
Phone: 720-524-4908; Email: jgusekfgisovcon.com

Abstract:
The concept of in-perpetuity is a very long time. Perpetual treatment (either actively or passively) of
acid rock drainage (ARD)  is unsustainable; cumulative economic  burdens on mining companies
and/or government agencies faced with treating ARD will certainly bankrupt future society. ARD
suppression at its source is the logical strategy to avoid or lessen ARD impacts. Innovative strategic
concepts have been advanced in recent years; this author has contributed to this effort. The concept
of land-applying biochemical reactor (BCR) effluent to suppress ARD is another promising strategic
tool. This white paper develops the idea in more detail.

The concept's elegance lies with the merging of two well-developed mine remediation/processing
technologies:  BCRs  and heap  or dump  leaching  of metal ores. In  the  proposed innovative
technology, organic-rich effluent from a BCR would be land-applied to acid-producing mine waste
(e.g., tailings, waste  rock  and coal refuse) using  solution  application  methods typically used in
precious metal heap leach pads. BCR effluent is typically anoxic and  contains biochemical oxygen
demand, excess  alkalinity, dissolved sulfide ion and dissolved manganese. If all these characteristics
can be preserved and the BCR effluent solution can be dispersed  over a large area of mine waste
(which could be revegetated or barren),  the downward percolating solution  should coat the mine
waste with a film of biosolids that would suppress biological and abiotic pyrite oxidation. In deeper,
more-oxidized  portions  of  the  rock/waste  column, surfaces  should be coated  with  ARD-
suppressing MnO2. It is believed that heap leach solution application  techniques could accomplish
this inexpensively. The mine waste ARD source would behave similar to a trickling filter in a waste
water treatment plant.  ARD might be suppressed  for decades, perhaps longer, before a  "booster
shot" of BCR effluent might be required.

Bio:
Jim Gusek is a chief engineer with Sovereign Consulting, Inc. and is based in Denver. He specializes
in the design of passive treatment systems for mining influenced water. Since 1987, his work with
acid rock drainage prevention and passive water treatment systems has included about 50 projects
throughout the United States and internationally. He is on the steering and mitigation committees of
the Acid Drainage Technology Initiative  - Metal Mining Sector (ADTI-MMS). He  recently received
the Reclamation Researcher of the Year award from  the American  Society  for  Mining  and
Reclamation. He graduated from  the Colorado School of Mines  in 1973 with a B.Sc. in mining
engineering. He  is a  founding member and former president of the Denver Professional Chapter of
Engineers Without Borders.
                                          22

-------
DISSOLVED  ORGANIC CARBON AUGMENTATION: AN  INNOVATIVE TOOL FOR
MANAGING  OPERATIONAL AND  CLOSURE-PHASE IMPACTS FROM MINING ON
SURFACE WATER RESOURCES

Charles Wisdom, Ph.D.1 (presenting author) and Felix Kristanovich, Ph.D.2
'Geosyntec Consultants, 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 330, Seattle, WA 98101
    Phone: 206-496-1451; Email: cwisdom@geosyntec.com
'ENVIRON International Corporation, 901 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2820, Seattle, WA 98164
    Phone: 206-336-1681; Email: fkristanovich(g),environcorp.com

Abstract:
Managing water  quality compliance  commitments and  preventing or minimizing  surface  water
quality impacts  can involve substantial effort and cost in each phase  of the mine life cycle, and are
subject to increasing levels of stakeholder concern over the effects of mining operations on surface
water quality. These  efforts can  be particularly challenging in  streams and lakes  receiving mine
runoff and process  discharge waters, where mine  operations and changes  in  land  use can
significantly reduce dissolved organic carbon (DOC)  exported to aquatic environments. These
changes  can result in enhanced  sensitivity to  metallic contaminants and reduced  productivity  in
receiving waters. Loss  of riparian vegetation can reduce DOC  levels up to 90 percent in streams and
15 percent in lakes, leading to pronounced changes in the transport, bioavailability, and toxicity of
metals. Recent  advances in our understanding of metal toxicity, expressed as the  Biotic Ligand
Model (BLM),  offer  the mining industry  a new and innovative approach  to managing and
minimizing mine water quality impacts.  The  BLM predicts metal  toxicity  by accounting for the
binding action of metals by DOC  in adjacent streams and lakes. Augmenting and managing DOC in
streams and lakes can therefore be an important element in an integrated treatment approach for
mine wastewater, mining-impacted stormwater, and process  water discharges. DOC levels can be
increased through short-term  augmentation  and  long-term wetland  and  riparian restoration  to
enhance  stream and lake health and resilience. Predicted bioavailability and toxicity, using the BLM
model, of a number of metals (e.g., copper, cadmium, lead, silver and zinc) can be used to develop
DOC augmentation requirements to set cost-effective  treatment goals  protective of beneficial uses
of streams and  lakes.  These treatment goals can then be incorporated into  closure plan remediation
strategies  and  post-closure  monitoring  programs.  Integrating DOC  management  into  mine
reclamation activities  such as erosion control and re-vegetation can, at  the same  time, help  to
preserve water quality, minimize environmental effects, and reduce overall closure costs.

The basic steps  in  this approach involve   1) establishing target DOC  levels based  on  pre-
development conditions, 2) developing-short-term DOC addition approaches  such  as incorporation
of leaf litter into  riparian soils, and 3) incorporation of long-term DOC additions in riparian and
wetland restoration designs. A proof-of-concept case study was  conducted to develop  a predictive
model to estimate bulk carbon application rates,  soil  organic matter  pool  formation, DOC soil
export rates, and  assessed treatment targets for a variety of receiving  water conditions (based on pH,
temperature and  hardness). The  results  of this study confirm  that: DOC  augmentation offers a
relatively  simple  but  comprehensive way to:  1)  develop  cost-effective approaches  to achieving
effluent treatment goals and limits, 2) establish off-site mitigation strategies for mining/refining
operations, 3)  integrate closure restoration efforts  with the  ongoing management of water quality,
and 4) enhance  the value of habitat restoration.
                                             23

-------
Bio:
Charles Wisdom is a Senior Consultant at Geosyntec Consultants. In this role, he provides both
public and private clients with water quality regulatory and remediation solutions addressing the
toxicity and fate and transport of metals and organic contaminants. Prior to Geosyntec, Charlie was
at ENVIRON  International  Corporation, focusing on risk assessment  and  NPDES  permit
compliance strategies. Charlie has conducted ecological risk assessments for mining companies and
public utilities for the exposure of fish, birds, mammals and humans to  chemicals, physical effects
and habitat modifications to assess mine  operating plans, determine NRDA  Damage Assessments
and design CERCLA cleanup plans. His research and presentation on the application of the Biotic
Ligand Model  provides  both cost-effective and  environmentally protective treatment goals for
stormwater and wastewater discharges. Charlie has a Ph.D. in chemical ecology from the University
of California, Irvine.

INFLUENCE OF PRE-MINE WEATHERING AND ROCK TYPE ON TDS RELEASE
FROM APPALACHIAN COAL MINE SPOILS

W. Lee Daniels1, Zenah W. Orndorff, Carl E. Zipper and Matthew J. Eick
Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences
0404, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
'Phone: 540-231-7175: Email: wdamels@.vt.edu

Abstract:
Appalachian coal mines have been implicated as major stressors to biota in  headwater streams due
to discharge of total dissolved solids (TDS). Large  volumes of blasted sedimentary rock  spoils  are
placed into highwall backfills  and head-of-valley  fills during the mining and reclamation process.
While the industry has made great advancements since  the 1970s in utilizing acid-base accounting
procedures to limit low pH and high  metal discharge waters, bulk TDS  release  in  excess of 500
mg/L is common and is typically dominated by SO4 and alkali cations. Unweathered sedimentary
rock  overburden materials can contain carbonates,  feldspars,  micas  and pyrite, which react rapidly
following mining disturbance  to  produce TDS. Our primary objective was  to evaluate  a column
leaching approach for TDS prediction.  Over 45 typical non-acid forming ground spoils (<. 1.25 cm)
were  leached (unsaturated) with 2.5 cm of simulated precipitation (pH  4.6)  for 20 weeks (2X  per
week) in lab  columns (7.5 cm x 40 cm). Leachates were analyzed for pH,  electrical conductance
(EC), Ca, SO4  and other parameters. Initial leachate EC was moderate (<.  1000  uS/cm)  for most
samples, although some  ranged to  >3000. Leachate EC decreased rapidly within several pore
volumes and most samples achieved a steady-state with relatively low  EC  levels (< 500 uS/cm)
within 20 leaching cycles. Rock  strata that have undergone significant pre-mining  oxidation and
leaching generate much lower EC when compared to local unweathered  materials from the same
strata. Finer textured siltstones and shales typically generate higher leachate EC than sandstones,  but
total pyritic-S content is a better predictor of both initial and long-term TDS  release than  rock type.
Ongoing research conducted  by the Appalachian  Research  Initiative for Environmental Science
(ARIES) is focused on (1) developing and validating new quick static tests  to predict both peak and
long-term TDS production and (2) determining appropriate  scaling  factors  to relate  both column
and static test data to predict field conditions.

Bio:
W. Lee Daniels is  the Thomas B. Hutcheson Professor of Environmental Soil Science at Virginia
Tech  in Blacksburg, Virginia.  He received  his Ph.D. in soil  science from  VPI & SU in  1985. Dr.
Daniels'  areas of specialization include stabilization and restoration of disturbed lands including
areas  disturbed by mining, road building, waste disposal, urbanization and erosion.  In particular, he
                                             24

-------
has focused his  research and consulting experience in mine reclamation, wetland impact mitigation
and  soil-waste  management  systems. His  teaching programs  at  Virginia  Tech  focus  on soil
geomorphology  and landscape analysis with particular emphasis on the relationships among surficial
geology, hydrology, soil patterns and long term landscape evolution processes. Major awards include
the Reclamation Researcher  of the Year by  the American  Society for  Surface  Mining and
Reclamation   (ASMR)  in   1993,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency's National Biosolids
Utilization Research Award in 2000 and the Lifetime Achievement in Research Award by ASMR in
2012.
      Session 3: Characterization (cont.)
HIGH SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTION OF CONTAMINATED FLOWS

Carl Keller
FLUTe
P.O. Box 340, Alcalde, NM  87511
Email: carl@flut.com

Presented by Ian Sharp
FLUTe
2412 Princeton Drive NE, Suite B, Albuquerque, NM 87107
Phone: 505-883-4032; Email: ian@flut.com

Abstract:
Information on the distribution of impacted water and the flow paths associated with the transport
of that water is difficult to  obtain in fractured rock sites. The drilling is expensive and the location
and  composition of the water is not easy to obtain. Information on the flow  characteristics in
fracture rock  sites is even  more difficult to  assess. However that information is  essential to the
assessment of the current state, the prediction of future transport, and the design of remediation
measures. The need is for high resolution measurements of conductivity, composition and  head
distribution.

Those kinds  of measurements are being made, using the methods described  herein, at many  EPA
Superfund sites, especially in the Eastern States where much of the contamination is in the shallow
bedrock. The  measurements are being made with  high spatial  and  temporal  resolution  using
available flexible  liner  methods as  produced  by  a company in New Mexico called  FLUTe.  This
presentation  is  focused  on  the kinds  of measurements performed  and  the results  of  those
measurements as relevant to the characterization of contaminant flow in fractured rock.

The  measurement methods consist of several kinds, but that most relevant to mine and tailings
water sites for conductivity distribution measurements uses the installation of a flexible liner. Those
measurements have a resolution of better than one foot in space and a transmissivity resolution of
better than 1 percent of the total transmissivity of the borehole. A typical measurement is performed
in 1-2 hours in a 100 m borehole. This measurement is used for assessing the  hydrologic flows near
mines in Canada. In general, the spatial resolution is far  better than obtained with  straddle packers
and much less expensive. Results of such measurements are provided in this presentation.
                                          25

-------
The second measurement of use for site characterization in fractured rock is the multi-level sampling
liner  system, which allows water  sample collection  and head  measurements  at  many discrete
elevations in  a single borehole. This can  greatly reduce the drilling costs  of a  site characterization.
Because the entire hole is sealed with  a flexible liner, there is no bypass concern as with straddle
packer systems. Also, there is no need for grout as a seal of the borehole, which can affect the water
chemistry.  The entire system  is  removable for other use of the borehole. It can  be installed in
vertical, angled or horizontal holes. Pressure transducers are often incorporated in  the system for the
head history, which is useful for seasonal fluctuations. Examples of results are provided.

The situations where these methods are best used are described as well as the circumstances that
limit their use. These methods have been in use for over 15 years, in most states, in  many other
countries at sites from Denmark to Australia. However, they are not yet widely known.  EPA is one
of the major users of these flexible liner methods, but also large companies such as Exxon Mobile,
Boeing, Army Corps of Engineers and many others are  regular users. The main  thrust of this paper
is  to  explain the methods  and to provide examples of results for  those unfamiliar with  the
technology.

Bio:
Ian Sharp is currently the Chief of Field Operations for all  FLUTe installations. He also assists in the
design and fabrication of special instrumentation in the development of new FLUTe methods. He
has been  installing  FLUTe's many  systems for over 12  years. He currently manages all FLUTe
fielding personnel in FLUTe's several  field offices  and coordinates all installation  schedules with
FLUTe customers in the United  States  and internationally. He  assists the  Principal Scientist in the
development of hardware and procedures for extraordinary or challenging fielding circumstances.

TECHNIQUES FOR SUCCESSFUL STORM-WATER MONITORING IN A MINING-
INFLUENCED WATERSHED

Thomas McComb, C.P.G., P.M.P.
Barge Waggoner Sumner and Cannon, Inc.
211 Commerce Street, Nashville, TN 37201
Phone: 615-252-4349; Email: tom.mccomb@bwsc.net

Abstract:
Barge  Waggoner  Sumner  and  Cannon,  Inc.  (BWSC)  has  been  actively  involved  with  the
investigation, characterization, and remediation/reclamation of mining-influenced watersheds in
southeastern Tennessee for over 15  years. Work performed in the watersheds is being managed as a
State voluntary site  and as an  EPA Superfund Alternative Site. Actions have been conducted using
the adaptive management approach  with recovery of benthic macroinvertebrate communities as the
remedial goal. A key element in the adaptive management approach for the site has been base-flow
and storm-flow stream monitoring.  The data from  these  events was  used to document  changes in
water quality trends at specific stream  reaches and over  the entire watershed  to locate  sources of
surface-water contamination  and   to  determine  when   sufficient  remedial   actions  have been
conducted in specific areas and tributaries. BWSC has  conducted over 20 storm-water monitoring
events and has developed  proven techniques for the  design, installation,  implementation,  and
evaluation of data from storm-water monitoring events.

Design —  The design of the event needs to take into account areas  of known sources, areas with
completed remediation  activities, and areas with active remediation activities. Other factors include
                                            26

-------
stream access, locations with existing weirs or flumes, and potential safety issues during storm
events.

Installation — The storm-water monitoring equipment needs to be calibrated and installed prior to
the anticipated storm-water monitoring event. The typical equipment to be installed would include: a
weather station,  autosamplers, recording pH, conductivity,  and temperature meters, area velocity
meters, weir plates,  and pressure transducers. Considerations for installation would include stream
geomorphology,  estimated flood heights, water-quality variations within the stream transect, and
potential security issues.

Implementation — Experience has shown  that storm-water monitoring must  be initiated prior to
beginning of the precipitation due to rapid changes in water quality at the transition between base
flow and storm flow. Sampling  during the  storm-water event is not steady state; during the event a
stream hydrograph is monitored to aid in the selection of the samples to be retained for analyses and
to determine when  the stream has returned to near base-flow conditions. The key to a successful
event involves selecting the  correct analytical suite, having the right field crew, and  developing
repeatable and simple methods for field data collection, sample collection and sample preparation.

Evaluation — The data evaluation can reveal information on the water quality trends at a single
location over time as well as upstream to downstream trends at specific times and long term trends
from event to  event. Data quality needs  to be  considered, particularly  the  inherent ranges of
measurement errors with different types of flow measurement devices.

Bio:
Tom McComb is  a Senior Geologist and Project Manager with Barge  Waggoner Sumner and
Cannon, Inc. (BWSC) in Nashville, Tennessee. Tom has  over 13 years of experience working as
BWSC's Lead Geologist for the assessment activities associated with  the reclamation of the Copper
Basin Mining District in Copperhill, Tennessee. The work at the Copper Basin is being conducted
using an adaptive management approach.  The activities conducted within the Copper Basin have
included  site  inventories,  storm-water   monitoring,  comprehensive   base-flow monitoring,
bathymetric investigations  of mine  pits  and collapses, prioritization of  remedial  actions, and
implementation of a CERCLA  Remedial Investigation.  Currently, Tom is the president-elect from
the Tennessee Region of  the  American  Institute  of  Professional  Geologists  (AIPG), and  is a
certified Project Management Professional.  He received a master's degree in geology from the
University of Cincinnati.

INSIGHTS ON MINE SITE  CHARACTERIZATION FROM EPA'S OPTIMIZATION
REVIEW INITIATIVE

Tom Kady
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Response Team
2890 Woodbridge Avenue, Mail Code: 205A-ERT, Edison, NJ 08837-3679
Phone: 732-906-6172; Email: kady.thomas@,epa.gov

Abstract:
"Overwhelming"  comes  to mind  when  describing  the  complexities  of characterizing and
remediating mine sites. With mountains  of waste rock,  acres of tailings ponds, miles of watershed
impacts,  and dozens of  mill  sites, mines  seeps and  adit  discharges, where does one begin?
Investigation can take decades and tens of millions of dollars. Remediation takes many decades and
hundreds  of millions more. Based on observations from mining site optimization reviews,  this
                                            27

-------
presentation describes  basic concepts to help navigate these  complex sites  and determine  early
actions that best put time, money and Mother Nature, working in your favor.

Bio:
Tom Kady is a member of EPA's Environmental Response Team (ERT). As the field support arm
of the Office  of  Superfund Remediation and  Technology Innovation, the  ERT provides  first-
responders to national and international incidents as well  as technical field support to Remedial
Project Managers and On-Scene  Coordinators at Superfund sites and  oil spills across all 10  EPA
regions. Tom's  area of focus is advancing the state of the art in real-time, direct-sensing technologies
to streamline crucial aspects of  remedial investigations, remediation  system designs  and system
performance monitoring. Tom also serves as a lead on optimization reviews for mine sites and other
Superfund sites in various phases of investigation and remediation. Prior to joining ERT,  Tom
served for 20+  years as regional  manager  for  several national   consulting/engineering and
remediation/construction firms. Tom has a B.S. in  chemical engineering from The Pennsylvania
State University.
             Session  4:  Source  Control / Mine
                  Closure Approaches (cont.)
DESIGN ASPECTS OF MINE SITE COVER SYSTEMS

Stephen Dwyer, Ph.D., P.E.
Dwyer Engineering, LLC
1813 Stagecoach Road, SE, Albuquerque, NM 87123
Phone: 505-271-0741; Email: dwyerengineering@,yahoo.com

Abstract:
Mine site closure designs  can be governed by a variety of regulations that are not necessarily written
for mine sites but  other solid, hazardous or radioactive waste sites. Closures at mine sites typically
include  cover systems that must  adhere to these adopted regulations. Because of the size and
uniqueness of mine closures, fitting this regulatory framework can prove difficult and expensive.

Cover systems employed  in mine site closures may require controlling applicable release vectors that
may include the minimization of flux, mitigation of erosion, control or prevention of biointrusion,
account for differential settlement, allow for stability for relative steep and long slopes,  allow for
establishment of native vegetation, be aesthetically acceptable; all while keeping costs down. Typical
prescriptive cover systems will not satisfy all or many of these design requirements.

An alternative cover system referred to as a  water balance' or an Evapotranspiration (ET) cover can
achieve  the  majority of design issues  related to  mine site  closures.  Furthermore, it can be
constructed with onsite soils saving significant costs.

The cover system  employs a unique design and water balance approach referred to as the Point of
Diminishing Returns (PODR) method developed by Dwyer et al (2007). This method minimizes the
depth of cover profile required to  achieve meteoric water flux criteria for the site. Unsaturated flow
modeling is utilized to identify the  depth of soil required to effectively minimize flux. Additionally,
                                          28

-------
the cover design  includes a surface layer referred to as a 'desert pavement' that incorporates rock
and  soil mixed to a ratio  that minimizes  soil loss  due to  erosive forces  while  preventing  the
formation of rills or gullies. The cover soil  minimizes gas omissions such  as radon from uranium
tailings impoundments to acceptable levels. Because the cover is composed of local soils, it is well
suited to provide a medium for native vegetation establishment.

The  multifaceted design approach  has  been  successfully deployed at cover  systems throughout  the
country for solid  waste landfills, hazardous waste landfills, radioactive waste landfills, mine tailings;
mine site evaporation ponds, and uranium tailings impoundments. Post-closure monitoring at many
of these sites has validated the design approach for water balance, erosion, slope stability, vegetation
establishment, and gas emissions control.

Bio:
Dr. Stephen F.  Dwyer is the Principal Engineer for Dwyer Engineering, LLC. Dr. Dwyer enjoys an
international reputation for excellence in alternative earthen  cover systems.  Dwyer Engineering  has
significant  experience  in solid waste  landfills,  site  closures, mine  reclamation, hazardous  and
radioactive waste remediation. Dr. Dwyer is a registered professional engineer in New Mexico as
well  as multiple other states with over  32 years of engineering experience. Dr. Dwyer has designed,
reviewed, monitored,  and/or provided construction oversight for over 200 hazardous, radioactive,
mine, and/or municipal solid waste site closures and cover systems in the United States, Australia,
Israel,  Canada, the South Pacific  and  Mexico.  Dr. Dwyer  has a B.S., M.S.  and Ph.D. in civil
engineering as well as an M.B.A. Dr. Dwyer was the principal investigator on a long-term research
project  at Sandia National Laboratories that  developed and demonstrated the evapotranspiration
(ET)  cover and capillary barrier  concepts.  Dr.  Dwyer  has  authored multiple  closure design
guidance's  including:  the EPA Design Guidance for  Landfill  Covers  (EPA-909-R-11-007); Los
Alamos National Laboratory/DOE  landfill  and site  closure design guidance;  and a contributing
author of the  Interstate Technology & Regulatory  Council (ITRC) guidance  documents on  site
closures. Dr. Dwyer serves as a technical expert for EPA Regions 6, 8 and 9.

BIO-MEDIATED SOIL IMPROVEMENT FIELD STUDY FOR EROSION CONTROL
AND SITE RESTORATION

M.G. Gomez, B.C. Martinez, C.E. Hunt1 (presenting author), L.A. deVlaming,J.T. Dejong,
D.W. Major and S.M. Dworatzek
Christopher Hunt, Associate, Geosyntec Consultants
   1111 Broadway, 6* Floor, Oakland, CA 94607
    Phone: 510-285-2748; Email: chunt@,geosyntec.com

Abstract:
Microbially  Induced  Calcite  Precipitation  (MICP),   a  bio-mediated  cementation  process that
improves the geotechnical properties of soils through the  precipitation of  calcium carbonate, is
becoming a promising alternative to  traditional soil improvement methods.  MICP has been shown
to increase soil stiffness, reduce permeability, and increase shear strength  in  laboratory experiments.
The  current  study presents a  field-scale, surficial application of MICP to  improve  the erosion
resistance of loose, sandy  soils and provide surface  stabilization for dust control  and future  re-
vegetation. The project was  performed at a mine site in the province  of Saskatchewan, Canada
during summer 2012. Four test plots  were established on  loose, poorly graded medium to  fine
grained sands generated from excavation of overburden materials at the site.  Three of the plots were
treated with a bacterial culture and nutrient solution,  and the  fourth plot served as a control (water
only addition). The applied cell density of the bacterial culture was the same for each plot, whereas
                                             29

-------
the nutrient solution concentration was varied across the plots to evaluate the impact on treatment
depth. The culture and nutrients were applied through a surficial spray application system over 20
days.  Soil improvement was assessed to a depth of 30 cm using dynamic cone penetration  (DCP)
resistance,  calcite  content, and biological activity  measurements. The most improved test  plot
developed  a competent,  sandstone-like  crust  measuring 2.5  cm  thick,  which  exhibited  strong
resistance to erosion and could easily support the weight of field personnel. DCP  resistance and
calcite content measurements indicated improvement to a  depth  of approximately 25 cm.  The
results are promising and suggest that further optimization could make the MICP  technology viable
for large-scale mining applications, including dust and erosion control, as well as other applications
where permeability reduction or strength increase may be beneficial.

Bio:
Christopher  Hunt, Ph.D.,  P.E., G.E.  is a  Principal  Geotechnical Engineer with Geosyntec
Consultants in Oakland, California, with more than 15 years'  experience managing and supporting a
variety of geotechnical and geoenvironmental projects. In this role, he has been a  key participant in
the analysis, design, and construction of both municipal solid waste and hazardous waste landfills,
including expansion,  closure,  and   master  planning of existing facilities.  In addition, through
Geosyntec, Chris has been a key industry sponsor and collaborator on  the University of California at
Davis  research into applications of Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) for ground
modification, including  strength increase and permeability reduction.  He has been a co-author on
several publications on this topic, including Bio-mediated Soil Improvement Field  Study to Stabilize
Mine  Sands (Geo-Montreal, 2013). Chris has B.S., M.S. and  Ph.D. degrees in  civil and geotechnical
engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.

LONG-TERM RESULTS OF COVER SYSTEM MONITORING IN SEMI-ARID
WESTERN USA

Jason Keller1, Mike Milczarek2(correspo?idingauthor) and Tzung-mow Yao3
1 GeoSystems Analysis, Inc., Hood River, OR
2 GeoSystems Analysis, Inc., Tucson, AZ; Phone: 520-628-9330; Email: mike@gsanalysis.com
3 GeoSystems Analysis, Inc., Tucson, AZ

Presented by MonishaBanerjee,Ph.D.
GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.
3393 N. Dodge Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85716
Phone: 520-628-9330; Email: monisha@gsanalysis.com

Abstract:
Monitoring  subsurface  air  flow, water percolation  processes, and  vegetation  characteristics  at
reclaimed mine waste  facilities provides a  quantitative assessment  of reclamation  success in
controlling net percolation (i.e., recharge)  and promoting vegetation establishment as well as their
function over time. The monitoring data also provides the opportunity to guide future reclamation
tailored to site specific conditions  such as climate, waste material  chemistry, and cover material
hydraulic properties. This presentation provides case studies from over a decade  of reclamation
performance monitoring at hard rock mine  facilities in the southwestern United States.

Data  from evapotranspiration cover monitoring at a  reclaimed leach  pad in  north-central Nevada
provide clear indications of the factors  contributing to  cover system  function and success.  South-
facing slopes were more effective at reducing percolation than  east- and west-facing slopes  due  to
their receiving more direct solar radiation. Greater leach ore drying in the summer were observed in
                                             30

-------
areas with greater  shrub and  deeper rooting density. Slight  differences  in  net percolation were
observed based on  slope position; however, percolation was greatest for those stations near runoff
channels.

Data also collected from closed waste rock facilities in Nevada was used to evaluate the relative
contribution of net infiltration and air ingress to ongoing geochemical reactions in the waste. Vadose
zone monitor wells instrumented at  various depth intervals allow collection of in-situ air and pore-
water samples as well  as  automated measurements of temperature, oxygen content and  water
content.  Data indicate  that internal  temperature  gradients within the interior of the waste rock
facility should be  considered when  evaluating long-term  potential  discharges in addition  to  net
percolation through the cover system.

Monitoring of cover systems at several mines in Arizona indicate that both circumneutral and acid
tailings can be reclaimed with relatively shallow covers. The effective depth of a cover system in
supporting vegetation  and  controlling net percolation can range  from  15 cm  for circumneutral
tailings to 60  cm or greater for acidic tailings. At several reclaimed  copper tailing sites, plant roots
have been observed to actively root  into circumneutral and moderately acidic  tailings. Soil moisture
dynamic  monitoring data indicates that the underlying tailings material has a significant effect on
cover systems efficiency and that tailings should be considered a component of the overall cover
system.

Bio:
Monisha J. Banerjee, Ph.D. is a Senior Scientist at GeoSystems Analysis, Inc. She has experience in a
broad range of vegetation, physical,  and hydraulic soil characterization, and microbial analyses and
survey techniques. Her research has included monitoring vegetation, landscape function, and erosion
of reclaimed  mine sites; analyzing the bacterial diversity of reclaimed mine tailings; designing and
testing experimental mine  waste covers; and  evaluating ore based on  physical and hydraulic
properties  for heap  leaching.  She  has  publications on  the  reclamation  of  disturbed desert
environments, including Bacterial Populations within Copper Mine  Tailings:  Long-term Effects of
Amendment  with  Class A  Biosolids  (Journal of Applied Microbiology,  2012)  and  Native Plant
Regeneration  on  Abandoned   Desert Farmland: Effects  of Irrigation,  Soil  Preparation,  and
Amendments on Seedling Establishment (Restoration Ecology, 2006). Monisha has a B.S. in biology
from the George Washington  University in Washington, DC  and  a Ph.D. in  soil,  water, and
environmental science from the  University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona.
                                             31

-------
Presentation Abstracts
         and
     Speaker Bios
          August 13. 2014

-------
      Session 5:  Characterization (cont.)
EFFECTIVE FIELD TECHNIQUES AND WATERSHED MODELING FOR
CHARACTERIZING MERCURY LOADING TO SURFACE WATER, BLACK BUTTE
MINE SUPERFUND SITE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON

Howard S. Young, L.G.1 (presenting author}, Scott E. Coffey, L.Hg.2 and Steve Wolosoff5
COM Smith, Inc.
1218 Third Avenue, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA  98101;Phone: 206-336-4900
^mail: younghs@,cdmsmi th.com
2Email: coffeyse@cdmsmith.com
3Email: wolosoffse@cdmsmith.com

Abstract:
This presentation will summarize the techniques and tools employed at an abandoned mercury mine
site in Oregon to characterize  the mercury load discharging from sources at the  mine  into the
downstream  watershed. Studies have  shown that  mercury loading  to surface  water changes
significantly throughout the year and vary with intensity of storm events. Effective characterization
of  mercury  loading  requires  a  clear understanding of  stream  discharge  rates and  mercury
concentrations in surface water, as well as information about the  atmosphere throughout the year
and at different storm intensities. At the Black Butte Mine Superfund Site, stream discharge rates
and mercury concentrations in surface water and  rainwater were analyzed through automated water
level and  water  quality sensors, a  dedicated atmospheric  deposition sampler and collection of
multiple discrete surface water samples throughout storm event hydrographs. These  data are being
used to construct and calibrate a site-specific watershed model that will be used to predict mercury
loading to stream catchments upstream and downstream of the mine  throughout the year. The
model enables users to evaluate mercury loading  at critical stream catchments and will aid in  future
source control decisions.

At the Black Butte Mine Site, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted one of
its earliest optimization reviews for the remedial investigation phase of a Superfund site. As part of
the optimization process,  immediate needs for  source control were identified through focused
evaluation of discharges from the mine site to surface water. A number of innovative methods were
used to rapidly evaluate mercury loading  of surface  water downstream of  the  mine. A Light
Detection and Ranging (LIDAR)  survey was flown  to  obtain  high-resolution topographic data
throughout the watershed. The  LIDAR dataset served the dual purposes of providing information
on catchment areas needed for the watershed model and enabling  delineation of waste dumps, mine
adits and  disturbed  areas  in the densely wooded area of the abandoned mine site. In the key
drainages affected by the mine, stream monitoring stations  consisting of staff gauges and stilling
pipes  equipped with  automated water level, temperature, pH,  conductivity,  and turbidity sensors
were installed. These automatic sensors allow for year-round monitoring of stage and water quality.
Longitudinal  surveys  of  the  stream  stations,  supplemented  by  manual  stream  discharge
measurements, were used to develop rating curves so that the stream discharge  could be  estimated
throughout the year using automated stream stage sensors. During three storm events in 2013  and
2014, field crews were rapidly deployed to the remote site to collect multiple  surface water samples
throughout the rising and falling limb of the storm event hydrograph. More than 300 surface water
samples collected from four stream stations were  analyzed for mercury and other key constituents to
determine changes in mercury concentrations and water quality throughout the hydrograph curve of
each storm event.
                                          33

-------
The presentation will include a discussion on the field techniques (e.g., clean hands sampling) and
equipment used to collect the low level mercury data from rainfall and streams, results of the first
three storm events and the preliminary development of the watershed model.  Strategies and tools
used to address challenging logistics of deploying field instrumentation and crews at a remote field
site on weather-dependent schedules will also be discussed.

Bio:
Howard S. Young is  a Senior Geologist at CDM Smith in Seattle, Washington. He has worked on a
number of remedial investigations and feasibility studies at a number of Superfund sites in Regions 9
and 10.  His focus  is on  the evaluation of impacted groundwater systems and  watersheds at
abandoned mine sites with recent projects including the Formosa Mine, the Blue Ledge Mine, and
the Black Butte Mine Superfund sites located in Oregon and California.  Prior to CDM Smith, he
worked in  the mining industry evaluating precious and base  metal deposits in Nevada and Alaska.
Howard has a B.S. in geology from Washington State University.

ON THE PROBLEM OF HYDRAULIC CHARACTERIZATION OF GRAVELLY MINE
WASTE AND COVER SYSTEM  MATERIALS

Jason Keller1, Mike  Milczarek2, Tzung-MowYao3* (presenting author) and Robert C. Rice3
^eoSystems Analysis, Inc., Tucson,  AZ
 GeoSystems Analysis, Inc., Hood River, OR; Phone: 520-628-9330; Email: mike@gsanalysis.com
3GeoSystems Analysis, Inc., Hood River, OR
*3393 N. Dodge Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85716
    Phone: 520-628-9330; Email: mvao@gsanalYsis.com

Abstract:
Successful  mine  waste  facility closure design requires  accurate understanding of the  hydraulic
properties of the cover material and underlying mine waste for purposes of estimating cover system
performance,  heap  leach  draindown  rates,  and  facility water  balances, to  name  a few.  The
consequences of inaccurate  estimates may  include  oversizing or  under sizing water treatment
facilities, excess percolation into mine waste, and under predictions  of drainage response to storm
events.  Mine waste  and frequently available borrow material for  cover systems  may contain a
significant fraction of gravel material (>4.75 mm), which influence the material hydraulic properties.
Small amounts of gravel can act as barriers to flow, whereas large amounts can create macropores
and preferential  flow paths.  MOSA  and ASTM  standard  laboratory  methods for determining
hydraulic properties  were developed for the fine-grained soil fraction and were not designed for
gravelly materials. Moreover,  removing the  gravel  fraction  and using published gravel correction
factors is generally not accurate for materials with greater than  20 percent gravel content. Over the
last decade, we have developed several laboratory  methods to quantify saturated and  unsaturated
flow behavior in gravelly materials.  These consist of using large diameter cores, directly measuring
the hydraulic conductivity function  at near saturation, and using flexible  wall methods to minimize
wall effects. Results from characterization work on waste rock and heap leach samples indicate that
1) unsaturated  flow  parameters  derived  from material without gravel cannot represent the actual
hydraulic behavior; 2) basing the hydraulic conductivity function on saturated hydraulic conductivity
cannot  describe  measured unsaturated  flow  data;  3)  a dual-permeability model  can improve
predictions of flow behavior, and; 4) a flex-wall column  design allows for successive measurements
of  hydraulic conductivity  and air  permeability under variable  bulk density conditions evaluated
during the cover system design phase.
                                             34

-------
Bio:
Mike Yao is a Senior Hydrologist and the Laboratory Director at GeoSystems Analysis, Inc. He has
extensive experience both in the field and laboratory in vadose zone and groundwater hydrology.
For  the past 20 years, he has  conducted large field-scale research in water and solute movement
through the unsaturated and saturated zones  and the application of computer models to these
processes. His expertise also includes the use of invasive and non-invasive geophysical techniques,
measurement of field,  laboratory hydraulic properties, characterization  of the unsaturated porous
media, field subsurface monitoring system design, artificial recharge, mine waste cover  design and
monitoring, heap leaching monitoring and optimization, and preferential and fracture flow in the
porous media.  The results of his  research  have  been applied to modeling of subsurface  flow,
characterization of the hydraulic properties of waste disposal sites, heap leaching and environmental
monitoring. He also has three years of experience as an exploration geologist in Chinese Petroleum
Cooperation. Mike has B.S. and  M.S. degrees in geology from the National Taiwan University and
M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in hydrology from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.

SHAFT SAMPLING AND PROFILING AT THE SECTION 27 MINE

Amy Andrews, P.E.
INTERA, Inc.
6000 Uptown Boulevard NE, Suite 220, Albuquerque, NM 87110
Phone: 505-246-1600; Email: aandrews(g),intera.com

Presented by Cynthia Ardito
INTERA, Inc.
6000 Uptown Boulevard NE, Suite 220, Albuquerque, NM 87110
Phone: 505-246-1600; Email: cardito@intera.com

Abstract:
The  Section 27  Mine is an underground uranium mine located  approximately 30 miles north of
Grants, NM. The ore deposit is part of the Grants Uranium Belt within the Ambrosia Lake Valley, a
broad, elongated valley that was once the site of some of the most productive uranium mines in the
United States and remains undercut  by layers  of  mine workings. Mine workings are known to be
connected from one end of Ambrosia Lake Valley to the other.

The  sandstone formations at and above the location of the ore were dewatered in the vicinity of the
mines beginning in the late 1950s and ending by 1986, forming a regional cone of depression. Since
1986, water levels in these units have been recovering as groundwater flows back into the dewatered
areas. Concentrations of sulfate, several  metals, uranium, and radium  currently exceed the New
Mexico State Groundwater. The process of mine dewatering introduced  oxygen into previously
reduced ore zones, causing uranium to be oxidized from its relatively insoluble tetravalent state to its
more soluble  hexavalent  form.  Once  the  mine  cavities are completely flooded,  oxygen will be
consumed  and,  if there are  no other  sources of oxygen, conditions  will return  to pre-mining
conditions, which will favor the removal of soluble uranium from groundwater.

INTERA is currently four years into a five-year plan to collect water quality data at the Section 27
Mine, in support of NMED's effort to collect  data in the entire Ambrosia Lake Valley. On a semi-
annual basis, INTERA collects continuously profiled geochemical water quality indicator parameters
from two vent shafts  at Section 27. Parameters  include temperature, pH, conductivity, oxidation
reduction  potential (ORP), rugged dissolved oxygen (RDO), and  depth of water (via barometric
pressure). On an annual basis, INTERA collects discrete depth water samples that are analyzed by a
                                            35

-------
laboratory for a wide range of dissolved metals and anions. Sample depths were selected based on
significant vertical changes in the continuously-profiled water chemistry indicator  parameters to
represent the full range of variability in groundwater quality in the groundwater column.

Collection of indicator data is fast and allows continuous  sampling of the entire water column so
that a large body of data  can be  built in a relatively short time.  Collection of a smaller body of
laboratory data will provide a way to tie indicator data to a larger number of chemical parameters.
INTERA's method of continuous shaft profiling coupled with discrete depth samples provides a
detailed look into the geochemical conditions of the  shafts at  various  depths within the water
column, which  cannot be seen with standard sampling methods. This could potentially provide
information about the oxidation-reduction state of the uranium at various locations in the sandstone
formations within the shafts.

Bio:
Amy Andrews,  P.E.,  is an Engineer at INTERA Incorporated  who  leads  mine-water and  mine
reclamation projects with  a focus on uranium  mining. She has experience  in mine reclamation
planning and design, engineering design of water retention  structures, groundwater and soil
remediation,  radiation safety and site radiation surveys, hard rock drilling and coring, aquifer testing,
remediation  system  design and  maintenance, and site  characterization. Amy  has applied this
experience at a  wide  variety  of sites including landfills, uranium mines,  potash mines, petroleum
storage tank sites, superfund sites,  CERCLA sites, fuel terminals and military bases. Amy was part of
a team of four INTERA colleagues who won  the 2010 Excellence in Reclamation Award from the
New Mexico Mining  and Minerals Department for reclamation  of the JJ No. 1/L-Bar Uranium
Mine. Amy  serves  as the INTERA Corporate Health and Safety  Officer in charge of OSHA
HAZWOPER and MSHA requirements. She has a B.S. in mineral engineering from New Mexico
Tech and a professional engineering license in mining and mineral processing from the state of New
Mexico.
              Session 6: Water Treatment
THE ECONOMICS OF WATER TREATMENT: CONVENTIONAL VERSUS HIGH
DENSITY SLUDGE PRECIPITATION

Mary Boardman1 (presenting author) and Jim Stefanoff, P.E.2
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, HMWMD-RP-B2,4300 Cherry Creek
    Drive South, Denver, CO 80246; Phone: 303-692-3413; Email: mary.boardman(g),state.co.us
2CH2M HILL, 717 W. Sprague Avenue, Suite 800, Spokane, WA  99201-3915
   Phone: 509-464-7202; Email: jim.stefanoff(a),ch2m.com

Abstract:
The Argo Tunnel Water Treatment Facility (ATWTF) was constructed in  1998 in Idaho Springs,
CO, to treat acid mine drainage associated with the Central City/Clear Creek Superfund Site.

As  the lead agency on the site,  the Colorado  Department of Public Health and  Environment
(CDPHE) is responsible for operation and maintenance (O&M) activities. In an effort to reduce
long term O&M costs, several minor process modifications have been implemented over the years.
                                          36

-------
In 2009, the CDPHE assumed the full financial obligation of operating the ATWTF. In preparation
of the transfer of ownership from EPA to  CDPHE, an optimization review was performed and
funding was made available from EPA to convert the treatment process from conventional lime
precipitation to high density sludge (HDS).

This presentation gives a brief introduction into the  theory of conventional and HDS treatment,
summarizes how  the  conversion was accomplished, and provides treatment cost information for
both the conventional and HDS processes.

Bio:
Mary Boardman is a project manager in the Remedial Programs Unit of the Colorado Department
of Public Health and  Environment. She has worked on many aspects of Superfund projects, from
performing preliminary  assessments  to managing the  design, construction,  and operations and
maintenance of remedial actions.  Current projects include the Central City/Clear Creek, Captain
Jack Mill and  Summitville Mine Superfund sites. Prior to joining Remedial Programs, Mary worked
as an  Analytical  Chemist  in  the State  Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory. Recently, Mary  was a
contributing member  of the Interstate Technology and  Regulatory Council's Mining Waste Treatment
Technology Selection and  Biochemical'B^eactors of Mining Influence Waters teams. Mary has a B.A. in chemistry
and M.S. in environmental science from the University of Colorado.

ALKALINE FLUSH: AN EMERGING TECHNOLOGY FOR IN SITU TREATMENT
OF MINE IMPACTED ALLUVIAL AQUIFERS

Olu Ogungbade1 (presenting author), Parvathy Kochunarayanan, Madhu Raghav, Dan Ramey
and Erick Weiland2
^hone: 520-498-6517; Email: olufunsho  ogungbade(g),fmi.com
2Freeport McMoRan, Environmental Technology/Life Cycle Analysis Team, 1600 E. Hanley
    Boulevard, Oro Valley, AZ  85737; Phone: 520-498-6591; Email: enck weiland@,fmi.com

Abstract:
Alkaline Flush (ALF)  Technology introduces an alkali reagent to  adjust groundwater and sediment
pH and the surface chemistry of sediments to provide in situ remediation of acidic-metals impacted
alluvial aquifers. Along with the reduction in groundwater and sediment acidity, this technology may
precipitate  metals of concern into  stable mineral  forms  significantly  reducing their aqueous
concentrations over both  the  short-term and  long-term.  Application of ALF technology may
provide a  "resiliency period'   or an "acceleration period." This  technology offers an opportunity  for
remediation of alluvial aquifer systems  at costs  lower  than  those associated with other potential
remedial alternatives.

Bio:
Olu is a research engineer within the  Environmental  Technology/Life Cycle team of Freeport-
McMoRan  based in  Oro  Valley, Arizona.  In  this  role, he investigates emerged and emerging
technologies to manage environmental liabilities within the company's portfolio.  He has an  M.S. in
environmental engineering from New Mexico Tech  and a B.S. in civil engineering from Obafemi
Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
                                            37

-------
INNOVATIVE CONTAMINANT REMOVAL FROM MINING WATER WITH A
SINGLE PASS ADVANCED TREATMENT SYSTEM

William E. Roper, Ph.D., P.E.1 (presenting author) and Kelly P. Rock2
Director of Research, Micronic Technologies, 201 Davis Drive, Unit E, Sterling, VA  20164
    Phone: 703-444-2011; Email: wroper@micronictechnologies.com
2Inventor, CTO, Micronic Technologies

Abstract:
Micronic Technologies has developed and patented MicroDesal™, a mechanical evaporation system
that removes contaminants from mining source water including surface, ground, brackish, turbid,
and industrial water. The  treatment unit mechanically creates a turbulent highly  dynamic tornado
flow, causing a rapid-evaporation process by increasing the  air speed and surface area of the micro-
water droplets. Using  low-pressure  and recycled thermal energy, the  water/air flow  processor
vaporizes  micron-size water particles into  water vapor and then later during the condensation
process  water vapor is reconstituted into pure water. With increased requirements for mine water
treatment and reuse, MicroDesal™1 could make a major contribution.

MicroDesal™1 is currently in second-generation closed-loop  system development. With support from
the Navy a flow bench testing platform is being developed  to conduct performance experiments for
designing higher through-put efficiency and  capacity units. The tornado effect in the evaporator also
creates a concentrated brine on the outer wall, which is separately collected. This attribute allows for
recovery of metals and other materials that may be reused  or sold for their commercial value. The
condensed product water from the system is highly purified and could  be reused on site for multiple
water requirements. The system is able to remove many of  the contaminants associated with mining
operations. The presentation will include performance data that are  third-party validated test results
from water samples provided  by a  number of the company's partners in the mining and industrial
sectors.  In most cases the removal rate is in the very high 95-99 percent range.

The presentation will describe the results of bench-scale testing with the MicroDesal™ system over
the  last two years  from  a variety  of  mining and  industrial wastewater  samples. Treatment is
accomplished without using filters,  membranes or chemicals. Testing and development studies with
the  system   have   shown  low  maintenance  and  no  water  pretreatment requirement.  Other
characteristics of the system include  a small footprint, and projected low operating/life cycle  cost
compared to alternative technologies.

Bio:
William E. Roper, Ph.D.,  P.E.  is the Director of Research  for Micronic Technologies where he
manages and supports  research activities  for advanced water treatment systems.  His technical
expertise and executive management  experience  includes extensive energy and water  technology
applications  at  Army and other DOD  facilities and public  utilities nationwide. Dr. Roper  is  the
former  Director  of the  Army Corps  of Engineers World-Wide   Civil  Works Research  and
Development Program, which involved water related research, development and execution at seven
major laboratories and  five research centers located  throughout the United States involving over
2,200 scientists and engineers. He  has authored over  150  technical papers  and 5 books  and is a
former  member of the Federal Senior  Executive Service. Dr.  Roper also  serves as  a  research
professor  at  George Mason University and a visiting Professor at Johns Hopkins University.  He
received his B.S. in mechanical engineering and Ph.D. in environmental engineering.
                                            38

-------
      Session 7:  Characterization (cont.)
LESSONS LEARNED FROM MINING-INFLUENCED WATERS STUDIES AT THE
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES

Virginia T. McLemore, Ph.D.
New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources (NMBGMR)
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Socorro, NM 87801
Phone: 575-835-5521; Email: ginger@nmbg.nmt.edu

Abstract:
Scientists at the NMBGMR have studied the effects of mining-influenced waters  (MIW), acid
drainage, and other environmental issues from mines and  mills  since it was created in 1927.
Geochemical databases are available  for selected  mining  districts  in  areas where  NMBGMR
scientists have had funded projects (Hillsboro, Pecos, Red  River,  Questa, Espanola Basin, etc.).
Some of the lessons learned in these studies, include:

(1) The NURE  data provides a first order of geochemical background conditions in New Mexico,
especially for uranium. The NURE stream-sediment data provides geochemical analyses for >27,000
samples collected throughout New Mexico  during 1970s.  The NURE hydrogeochemical data
provides analyses for > 12,000 surface and well water samples. In addition to  uranium, the  NURE
data contains limited analyses of other elements, including pH and conductivity. Examination of the
NURE data  is beneficial when used with caution and understanding of the problems with the data.
Several  areas examined in New Mexico are  a  result  of contamination from  mining  and other
anthropogenic inputs; other areas  are a result  of natural processes related to local rock chemistry,
weathering, or formation of mineral deposits. More detailed sampling is required in these areas.

(2)  Uranium  prospects and geochemical uranium anomalies  in both water and stream-sediment
samples are found in the Tesuque Formation, San Jose district, Santa Fe County and residents locally
have high concentrations  of uranium and radon in their  drinking water. The uranium mines and
occurrences  found  in  the Tesuque  Formation  probably  represent  natural  precipitation and
concentration from uraniferous groundwater, not MIW, and are most likely a result of weathering of
uranium  from rocks in the  Tesuque Formation  and the  adjoining mountains and subsequent
migration of uranium and  radon in the ground water. Uranium then precipitated from the waters to
form the uranium anomalies found in the groundwater.

(3)  The  area southeast of the Orogrande  district,  Otero  County exhibits  anomalous  copper
concentrations in stream-sediment samples  (23-41 ppm). No  mineralized  areas  were identified
during field examination and no other geochemical anomalies were observed. The most likely source
for this copper anomaly is  the abandoned copper smelter located in the northern part of the town of
Orogrande.

(4) Geochemical analyses of surface-water samples  indicate that drainage from the Terrero  (Pecos)
mine, Willow Creek district did not significantly affect the composition of the surface water in the
area, except in the immediate vicinity of the  mine and mill site. Elevated concentrations of Cu, Pb,
Zn, and Cd  occurred in stream sediments below both the Terrero mine and  Alamitos Canyon mill
sites, before reclamation began. Collectively, multi-disciplinary studies suggest that Cu, Pb, Zn, and
                                          39

-------
other metals were eroded and leached from the Terrero mine waste rock pile and the tailings piles in
Alamitos Canyon. The overall  metal concentrations dramatically decreased in  stream sediments
below Pecos Village, mostly due to dilution of sediment derived from the red bed sedimentary units.
Since reclamation of the Pecos mine, Alamitos Canyon mill, campgrounds and roads began in 1990-
1991, Cu, Pb and Zn concentrations have decreased overall.

(5) Multidisciplinary studies of the Questa rock piles indicates that predominant weathering reactions
in the GHN mine waste rock  pile involve the oxidation of pyrite, dissolution of carbonate,  and
formation of sulfate minerals, mainly  gypsum, jarosite, and soluble, efflorescent salts  (depending on
pH). The chemical composition of waters from the Questa rock piles (i.e., seeps and runoff waters
from the rock piles, chemistry of leachate waters)  imply  that silicate dissolution is occurring within
the rock piles. Little if any clay  minerals are forming as a result of weathering; instead the clays are
from pre-mining altered rocks.

In conclusion, these and other studies indicate that  the differences in chemistry of MIW  due to
mining within the various mining districts in New Mexico are due to differences in geology, type of
mineral deposits, and  alteration of adjacent rocks, including weathering.  Each area  is  site-specific
and  must be examined in detail and  over a period of time to determine the cause of  the adverse
MIW.

Bio:
Ginger McLemore is a Senior Economic Geologist with  the New Mexico Bureau of Geology  and
Mineral Resources, a research division of New Mexico Tech. She  holds B.S. degrees in geology and
geophysics, an M.S.  degree in geology from New Mexico Tech, and received her Ph.D. in geoscience
from University of Texas at El Paso in  1993. Ginger began work with the Bureau  in  1980 as an
economic geologist specializing in uranium deposits. She has  published numerous articles (>150
articles) on mineral resources and on environmental impacts of those resources in  New Mexico. Her
current  projects include  the   study of  alkaline  magmatism,  carbonatites,  and   geology   and
environmental geology of mineral deposits in New  Mexico.  Numerous New Mexico Geological
Society  field conferences have  benefited from her expertise.  She also  is an adjunct professor and
teaches Geology of the Industrial Minerals, a graduate level course for the Department of Earth and
Environmental Sciences and Department of Mineral Engineering at New  Mexico Tech.
                                             40

-------
ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF COPPER-NICKEL-BEARING BEDROCKS ON
BASELINE WATER QUALITY IN THREE NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA
WATERSHEDS

Perry M. Jones1 (presenting author]^ Laurel G. Woodruff2, Robert R. Seal II3, Nadine M. Piatak4,
Steven Hauck5 and Carrie E. Jennings6
'U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN  55112
    Phone: 763-783-3253; Email: pmjones@usgs.gov
2U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN  55112
    Phone: 763-783-3291; Email: woodruff@usgs.gov
3U.S. Geological Survey, 12201  Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192-0002
    Phone: 703-648-6290; Email: rseal@usgs.gov
4U.S. Geological Survey, 12201  Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192-0002
    Phone: 703-648-6254; Email: npiatak@usgs.gov
5Natural Resources Research Institute, 5013 Miller Truck Highway, Duluth, MN 55811
    Phone: 218-720-4273; Email: shauck@nrn.umn.edu
6Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155
    Phone: 651-259-5424; Email: carrie.jennings@state.mn.us

Abstract:
Mineral exploration is occurring and mines are being proposed to extract  copper, nickel, cobalt,
titanium,  and platinum-group-metals (PGM)  from the  basal part of the  Duluth  Complex  in
northeastern  Minnesota. The Duluth Complex is a series of Middle Proterozoic igneous intrusive
rocks, which  crop out from Duluth to near Grand Portage, Minnesota (Miller and others, 2002). The
basal  part of the  complex  contains world-class  mineral deposits that represent the  third-largest
copper and nickel resource  and the fourth-largest precious  metals  resource in the world (Myers,
2012).

The U.S.  Geological Survey, Natural Resources Research Institute, and Minnesota Department  of
Natural Resources are conducting a cooperative study from  2012 to  2016 to:  (1) assess copper,
nickel, and other constituents in surface water, rock, streambed-sediment, and soil (including parent
material) in watersheds that cross the mineralized basal contact of the Duluth  Complex; and (2)
determine if natural metal concentrations are currently influencing regional water quality in areas of
potential mining. Water,  streambed-sediment,  soil, and  bedrock samples are being collected and
analyzed in three  unmined watersheds with  the following different mineral-deposit  settings:  (1)
copper-nickel-cobalt-platinum  group  metal mineralization (Filson  Creek  watershed),  (2) titanium-
oxide mineralization (headwaters of the St. Louis River watershed),  and (3) no identified mineralized
deposits (Keeley Creek watershed). Water samples are being analyzed for 12  trace metals (total and
dissolved  concentrations), 14 other inorganic constituents (dissolved concentrations), alkalinity, pH,
total organic  carbon,  dissolved organic  carbon, and stable isotopes (oxygen, hydrogen and  sulfur).
Soil, streambed-sediment, and  bedrock samples are being analyzed for  44  major  and trace elements,
total carbon,  inorganic carbon, and 10 loosely  bound metals. Continuous  streamflow data are  being
collected at three USGS stream gages. Streamflow and water-quality data are being applied  to new
conceptual hydrologic models  and existing biotic  ligand models  to assess the influence of  existing
geochemistry and possible mining activities on regional water quality.

References
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck,  S.A., Peterson, D.M., and Wahl,
    T.E.,  2002,  Geology and mineral  potential  of  the  Duluth Complex and related rocks  of
    northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 58, 207 p.
                                             41

-------
Myers, J., 2012, Digging into the promise of copper, Minnesota Conservation Volunteer, vol. 75, no.
    443, p. 8-19.

Bio:
Perry Jones is  a  Hydrologist for the U. S. Geological Survey, Minnesota Water Sciences Center
where he has conducted water resources research for 18 years. He received his B.S. in geology from
State  University of New York at Cortland and his M.S. in geology at the University of Minnesota.
He previously worked for seven years at the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Besides his research into baseline
characterization of potential mining areas in northern Minnesota, Perry is currently conducting
hydrologic  research in the areas of groundwater/surface water  exchange in Minnesota  lakes and
hydrogeologic characterization of low-permeability formations in Minnesota.

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND GEOCHEMICAL CONTROLS ON GROUNDWATER
PLUMES AT ARID SITES: LESSONS FROM ARCHETYPE URANIUM MILLING
SITES

Brian B. Looney1 (presenting author), Miles E. Denham1, Carol A. Eddy-Dilek1,
Margaret R. Millings1, William Dam2 and Mark Kautsky2
Savannah River National Laboratory, 773-42A, Aiken, SC
2U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management, LM-20, Grand Junction, CO

Abstract:
Data  from several former uranium milling processing sites in the western United  States affirm a
conceptual model in which the climate and  geomorphology, and the associated geochemical and
hydrological conditions, control the subsurface fate  and transport of contaminants. In arid settings,
typical for many  milling sites,  shallow groundwater is  transferred into the  vadose  zone and
atmosphere via evaporation,  transpiration  and  diffuse  surface  seepage.  During  these  transfers,
dissolved constituents  precipitate as evaporitic minerals  (e.g.,  blodite, thenardite and halite) along
with accessory minerals  (e.g., carnotite)  containing trace elements such as uranium. In locations
where the water table is relatively deep (> 2m), these  precipitates will accumulate as nonpedogenic
intervals in the deep vadose zone near the  capillary fringe, around the roots of phreatophyte plants,
and near surface seeps. In areas where  the water table is shallow, precipitates will also accumulate at
the soil surface as a result of capillarity and evaporation. The  accumulation and distribution of
constituents associated with milling and extraction operations  is  analogous to  natural evaporite ore
deposits in North America, Australia, Europe and Africa.

The sites in Tuba City, Arizona and Riverton, Wyoming are  archetype mill sites in arid settings,
representing deep and shallow water table cases, respectively.  Available hydrological, geochemical
and radiological (aerial gamma) data from these sites provide key insights related to contaminant fate
and transport. At Tuba  City,  hydrological and  geochemical  processes  limit the size  of the
groundwater plume and  reduce  the  potential  for  contaminated  groundwater to crop  out  at
Moenkopi Wash,  while eolian processes have resulted in  limited  surficial dispersal of milling related
constituents along the primary wind vectors. At  both sites, milling-related evaporitic minerals  that
have formed in the near-field and  mid plume area will sustain elevated groundwater concentrations
of anthropogenic constituents such as sulfate and uranium for an extended timeframe.
                                             42

-------
Bio:
Brian B. Looney is a research engineer in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River
National Laboratory (SRNL)  and an adjunct professor at Clemson University. Brian received his
B.S. in environmental science from TCU in 1978 and his Ph.D. in environmental engineering from
the University of Minnesota in 1984. Over the past 31 years, Brian has successfully developed and
deployed a wide  range of innovative environmental characterization and clean-up technologies for
soil and groundwater. His applied  science research addresses radionuclides, metals and organic
contaminants and focuses on approaches that beneficially couple active environmental clean-up and
natural attenuation processes. Brian  serves as a technical advisor supporting the  national  DOE
Environmental Management and Legacy Management Programs. He has received a  number  of
national awards  for  technology development and innovation.  Dr.  Looney has  11  patents  for
environmental  technologies  and many scientific publications including the  book Vadose  Zone
Science and Technology Solutions.
      Session 8: Water Treatment (cont.)
BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS FOR TREATING MINING INFLUENCED WATER

Douglas Bacon1 and David Gates2
1 State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 North 1950 West, P.O. Box 4840
   Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840; Phone: 801-536-4282; Email: dbacon@,utah.gov
2State of Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box 1677
   Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677;Phone: 405-702-5124; Email: david.cates@,deq.state.ok.us

Abstract:
Innovative  approaches  and  technologies  need to be  developed and  implemented that solve
environmental  issues and remove existing regulatory  barriers.  The  Interstate Technology and
Regulatory Council (ITRC) is a state-led, national coalition helping regulatory agencies, site owners,
and technology developers and vendors achieve better environmental protection through the use of
innovative technologies. Through  open  communication among its partners, ITRC is streamlining
and  standardizing the regulatory  review process  for better, more  cost-effective, environmental
technologies.   Funding  comes from the  Departments  of  Defense  and  Energy,  the  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency  as well as industry and is used to support teams to address state
environmental priorities. The ITRC mine waste team was formed in 2008 to address mine impacted
solids and water and produced a web-based guidance to help select technologies that address a wide
variety of mine waste issues (ITRC MW-1, 2010 at http://www.itrcweb.org/miningwaste-guidance).
During the development of the first guidance, the team felt that although biochemical reactors
(BCRs) were a promising technology, more information on their design, use  and success was
needed. As a result, in 2013, the team completed a guidance on their use. (http://itrcweb.org/bcr-
l/). The guidance contains information on the  applicability, design, construction, monitoring and
maintenance of BCRs as well as discussions on the related regulatory and  public stakeholder issues.
Fifteen case studies are included.
                                          43

-------
Bio:
Douglas  Bacon  is  a project  manager  for  the  Utah  Division  of Environmental  Response  &
Remediation, Utah Department of Environmental Quality. He began working for UDEQ in 1997,
and has over 15 years' experience  overseeing Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper's Superfund response
actions. Douglas has been integrally involved with the selection, implementation, and oversight  of
response actions addressing both solid mine waste and mining-influenced water. Since 2007 Douglas
has represented Utah on  two Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) technical teams
investigating remedial technologies for mining influenced water and  solid mine waste. He has
assisted with the development and publication of two technology guidance documents and authored
an overview and  case study on the use  of  pressure  driven  membrane separation to address the
treatment of mining influenced ground water. Douglas  has been an instructor and now serves  as
Utah's point of contact  for  ITRC's State Engagement program. Douglas earned a bachelor  of
science degree in environmental biology from Plymouth State College in Plymouth, New  Hampshire
in 1997 and earned his credentials as a  Certified Public  Manager from the State of Utah in June
2007.

ENHANCED SULFATE REDUCTION TREATMENT OF MINING-INFLUENCED
WATER USING BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS - IMPACTS ON MERCURY
SPECIATION

Steve R. Dent, Ph.D.1 (presenting author), Nicholas R. Anton, P.E.2, David J. Reisman3, C. Cora,
Chris Eckley, Ph.D.4, Souhail Al-Abed, Ph.D.5 and Kira Lynch6
Environmental Engineer, EIT, COM Smith, 1220 SW Morrison Street, Suite 200
   Portland, OR  97205; Phone: 971-201-6976; Email: dentsrfgicdmsmith.com
Environmental Engineer, CDM Smith, Denver, CO 80202
3Sr. Environmental Scientist, CDM Smith, Cincinnati, OH 45249
4Mining Geochemist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA 98101
5Work Assignment Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
   Cincinnati, OH  45268
Environmental Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA 98101

Abstract:
This paper/presentation will summarize and compare a bench top laboratory study and a  treatability
study conducted to evaluate ex situ passive treatment options for the Formosa Mine adit discharge as
part  of an ongoing  remedial  investigation/feasibility study program. The study was performed  to
evaluate the effectiveness of passive pre-treatment technologies and biochemical reactors  (BCRs) for
treating acidic adit discharge. A BCRs biologically mediated process provides an organic substrate  as
an electron donor  to various  aqueous sulfide species for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) to  reduce
sulfate present in  mining-influenced water (MIW). Subsequently, the metals present in  MIW react
with the sulfide species  to form metal sulfide precipitates such  as iron,  copper, nickel and  zinc
sulfides. One issue of particular concern with  harnessing sulfate reduction for the treatment of MIW
when mercury is present is the potential effects on mercury speciation. Mercury present in MIW is
primarily in the inorganic form Hg(II); however most of the mercury that accumulates in biota is in
the organic form  methylmercury (CH3Hg+  or more  commonly MeHg). SRB  are one  of the
organisms primarily responsible for the conversion of Hg(II) to MeHg. The Formosa adit has trace
mercury concentrations of approximately  3 nanograms per liter (ng/L), similar to average natural
concentrations observed  in unimpacted  streams. Average concentrations  for MeHg in unimpacted
streams are much lower, approximately 0.2 ng/L.
                                            44

-------
One goal of this study was to answer the question: what is the contribution of MeHg coming from
the column and BCR effluent, if any, to the receiving water body? In this study, a series of bench top
laboratory column tests were compared to a series of onsite treatability BCR tests. The bench top
columns consisted of three columns packed with ChitoRem®, two columns packed with a woody
substrate and  manure  mixture, and  one control  packed with sand.  The  ChitoRem®  and woody
substrate columns were tested with untreated anoxic MIW and pH 6.5 specific units (su)  adjusted
anoxic MIW, with one extra ChitoRem® column and one extra  sand column  fed with a sodium
azide treated water  as abiotic controls.  Six  field BCR configurations were tested, one woody
substrate and one ChitoRem BCR with no pre-treatment of the influent MIW, one woody substrate
and one ChitoRem® BCR with successive alkalinity producing system (SAPS) pre-treatment, and  one
woody  substrate  and  one ChitoRem   BCR with ChitoRem   pre-treatment of the MIW. Each
laboratory and field treatment configuration was  evaluated;  (1) for its ability  to  maintain  redox
conditions sufficient to induce  sulfate reduction and metal removal efficiency (MRE) greater than 90
percent,  and  (2) for its effect on  the  mercury concentration and speciation in the BCR  effluent.
Parameters were measured to  evaluate: 1) MIW  pH neutralization; 2) sulfate reduction surrogate
indicators such as sulfate, sulfide, alkalinity and redox; 3) MRE with target metals such as cadmium,
copper, and zinc which drive risk, and other metals such as iron and aluminum, which are present in
high concentrations; and 4) trace mercury speciation, both total and methylmercury. This study will
inform  choices on the configuration  of a  biochemical  treatment system and will  help  mitigate
potentially negative effects of MeHg release.

Bio:
Dr. Stephen (Steve) R. Dent is a staff Engineer/Scientist in the technical services group at CDM
Smith. In this role, he provides technical support for several Superfund Sites in EPA Regions 9 and
10. Prior to CDM Smith,  Steve was a research  assistant at Washington  State University (WSU),
where he pursued and received a Ph.D. in civil engineering. The focus of  Steve's dissertation was
evaluating the  effects of lake and reservoir treatments and management strategies on the cycling of
metals in aquatic ecosystems. During his tenure at WSU, Steve constructed and maintained a trace
mercury analytical laboratory.  He received  his bachelors and masters  degrees in  environmental
engineering from Montana Tech of the University of Montana, where he investigated  the flux of
mercury from remote forest areas.  Steve has several publications relating to mercury and lake
assessments as well  as  educational  outreach and  has  presented at multiple conferences  and
workshops.

BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS FOR PASSIVE TREATMENT OF SELENIUM

James S. Bays1 (presenting author), B.T. Thomas2 and Derek Evans3
1CH2MHILL, 4350 W. Cypress Street, Tampa, FL 33607
    Phone:  813-281-7705; Email: jbays@,ch2m.com
2CH2MHILL, 1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1600, Atlanta, GA 30328
    Email: BT.Thomas(g),ch2m.com
3CH2MHILL, 14701 St. Mary's Lane, Suite 300, Houston, TX 77079
    Email: devans@ch2m.com

Abstract:
Passive biological treatment systems rely  on naturally  occurring biological, chemical and  physical
processes to achieve  treatment. Typically more land-intensive than active treatment systems, passive
biological systems can be  less  expensive to  operate and manage because of lower or negligible
energy or chemical inputs. Labile  organic carbon  released from an organic substrate serves as an
electron  donor. Substrates composed of wood chips, sawdust,  mushroom compost, manure,  hay,
                                            45

-------
yard wastes, and limestone granules have been used in varying proportions. Termed biochemical
reactors (BCRs), these passive systems have  been employed previously for treatment of a variety of
mine-influenced waters and in a variety of forms but their incorporation into  passive treatment
systems for selenium (Se)  reduction is relatively new with a variety of forms and  applications. In
passive treatment systems,  oxidized forms  of Se  (selenite and  selenate)  can be  transformed to
selenite, elemental selenium, selenides, and  organic Se through  microbial reduction,  followed by
sequestration in soil and sediments. Common electron acceptors that must be removed before or
concurrent with oxidized selenium reduction include dissolved oxygen and nitrate.

Recent advances have come through implementation  of Se  treatability pilot studies and full-scale
systems by CH2MHILL for mining and power companies and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
along with additional projects discovered through professional contacts and continuing review of the
literature.  Pilot studies have indicated consistently  that total Se can  be reduced to <5  ug/L  and
below to  method detection limits. These projects have demonstrated that, where feasible, passive
treatment is a practical, cost effective, and technologically appropriate way to manage Se, particularly
for mine-influenced waters, which  may be  located remotely without power access, have elevated
salinity, and originate in extreme climates that may range from arid desert to  cold locations. Similar
solutions  for other contaminated water sources are expected when siting and sizing constraints  can
be met.

Multiple pilot studies and full-scale  passive biological treatment projects undertaken since  2010 have
demonstrated successful and sustained reduction of Se from diverse water sources, such as coal
mine drainage,  gravel mine seepage,  reverse  osmosis (RO) membrane concentrate, and  FGD
scrubber wastewaters. Findings indicate that Se concentrations spanning a range of 10-1000 ug/L
have  been demonstrated to be treatable  down  to  1-10 ug/L. Zero-order volumetric removal rates
have spanned a range of <10 to >30 mg Se/d rrf3 of substrate. First-order, area-based removal rates
show a central tendency of approximately 400  m/yr, depending upon inlet oxidized nitrogen,  and
vary in response to mass and hydraulic loading  rates. Nominal BCR hydraulic residence times range
from <1  to >3 days. Nitrate reduction is a  necessary step  to achieve effective Se reduction, and is
typically  accounted  for  by  increasing BCR size. The systems  have  been shown  to maintain
satisfactory performance even with maximum inlet flows up  to 3x average, and under ambient air
temperatures <0°C.  BCRs  export  organic  carbon, color,  sulfide, manganese, iron, ammonia  and
phosphorus that can affect receiving water quality and may exceed compliance limits. Treatment of
these "byproducts" typically incorporates passive or active aerobic  systems such as oxidation ponds
and constructed wetlands. Management of organic substrates  must factor in long-term  replacement,
disposal and closure requirements.  Toxicity characteristics  of the substrate must be determined to
establish  disposal  methods.  Construction  and  operational  costs  of  Se  BCRs  can  often  be
substantially less than conventional treatment systems.

By summarizing the key findings of these recent projects, the paper captures the range of progress in
sustainable Se treatment using passive biochemical reactors and prospects for future applications.

Bio:
Jim Bays  is a Technology Fellow with CH2MHILL. Jim provides technical guidance and direction
for projects using wetlands or other  natural treatment systems for water quality improvement. From
1999-2007, Jim  served  as  Global  Technology  Leader  for Natural  Treatment Systems  for
CH2MHILL. Now in his 30th year with CH2MHILL, Jim has consulted on constructed wetland
projects   throughout North  America,  Europe,  India,  southeast  Asia  and  Australia. Recent
publications focus on the  use of biochemical  reactors for selenium  reduction in mine-influenced
water and membrane concentrate, constructed wetlands for treatment of stormwater and combined
                                             46

-------
sewer overflows, and floating wetland islands for nitrogen reduction in reclaimed water. Jim has a
B.S.  in environmental biology  from Ohio  University and an M.S. in environmental engineering
sciences from the University of Florida.
                  Session 9: Source Control  /
            Mine  Closure Approaches (cont.)
STRATEGY AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRIORITIZATION OF MINE
WASTE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION WITHIN THE HEAD WATERS OF THE
TAR CREEK WATERSHED

Marc Schlebusch, P.E.1 (presenting author), Chad Ferguson, P.E., R.G.2, Chris Robb, P.E.3 and
Bryant Burnett4
'COM Smith, 9200 Ward Parkway, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO  64157
   Phone: 816-444-8270; Email: schlebuschm@cdmsmith.com
2Hydrogeologic, Inc., 6340 Glenwood, Bldg. #7, Suite 200, Overland Park, KS 66202
   Phone: 913-317-8860; Email: cferguson@,hgl.com
3Hydrogeologic, Inc., 6340 Glenwood, Bldg. #7, Suite 200, Overland Park, KS 66202
   Phone: 913-317-8860; Email: crobb@,hgl.com
4Capt. U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, Galena Field
   Office, 211 W. 7th Street, Galena, KS 66739
   Phone: 620-783-5100; Email: burnett.bryant@,epa.gov

Abstract:
This  presentation will  summarize  the phased remediation strategy for the affected  portions of
the Tar Creek watershed in southeastern Kansas. Large-scale underground mining of ore bodies
containing lead and zinc occurred throughout the Tri-State Mining District of  Kansas, Oklahoma,
and Missouri from the  1870s until  1970. The deposition of waste rock and tailings from ore mining
and processing has adversely  affected the  watershed  of Tar Creek in  southeastern  Kansas  and
northeastern Oklahoma. The headwaters of the Tar Creek watershed and its  adjacent mine waste
source areas span 115 square miles and are part of the Cherokee County Superfund Site Operable
Unit 4 — Treece (OU-4).  Cleanup of OU-4 is managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region  7 and  the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE).  The
remediation of the lower reaches of Tar Creek is managed by EPA Region 6  and the Oklahoma
Department  of  Environmental Quality (ODEQ). Since  periodic  monitoring began within the
Tar Creek watershed in 1993, surface water samples have exceeded the chronic aquatic  life criterion
for cadmium, lead and  zinc. EPA Region 7 is developing a remediation  strategy for the headwaters
of Tar Creek, its  tributaries and the adjacent mine waste areas north  of the Kansas-Oklahoma state
line.  The OU-4 project encompasses 3.8 miles of Tar Creek and 445 acres of wetlands and open
water, adjacent to 3.4  million cubic yards  of  mine  waste  and tailings dispersed between nine
distinct source areas.

The 2006 Record of Decision (ROD) for OU-4 planned for remediation of contaminated sediments
in Tar Creek and its tributaries only after  all OU-4 mine  waste areas were addressed. The OU-4
project team determined that a phased remediation approach will make best use of limited resources
to meet the  ROD remedial action  objectives and  stakeholders' expectations. Under the phased
                                         47

-------
approach, the team will  holistically remediate and restore Tar  Creek, its tributaries and adjacent
mine waste areas in the OU-4 project area progressing upstream to downstream in a minimum of
five phases. The cleanup sequence will prevent recontamination of previously remediated areas.

Remediation of the streambed within Tar Creek and its tributaries concurrent with  adjacent mine
waste areas will provide a comprehensive remedial approach and increase long-term cost efficiency.
Rather than remediating  mine waste areas first and then addressing contaminated sediments, as
was originally planned, the comprehensive approach will reduce the number of contracts and field
mobilizations, make better use of mine waste consolidation areas and allow for earlier restoration of
wetland habitat. Contaminated watershed runoff will be reduced  by excavating mine  waste and
relocating them  out  of the immediate  flood plain,  consolidation and  covering  mine waste in
adjacent  upland areas and  reestablishment of wetland habitat. Mine waste  consolidation  areas
adjacent to Tar Creek in high-water-velocity locations  will be protected through realignment of Tar
Creek  in  key areas,  benching of  overbank  areas  to reduce  water velocities, and  the use  of
geosynthetic materials and armoring. Short-term and long-term  monitoring  will  serve  to  assess
achievement  of short-term  remediation expectations and assist  in prediction of  the  long-term
success of the remedy.

Bio:
Mr. Schlebusch is an Environmental Engineer with  CDM Smith.  He manages several Superfund
remediation projects in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regions 7 and 8 ranging from
solvent-contaminated  groundwater  to  mine waste  impacted  land  and  water.  His  Superfund
experience includes site characterization, remedy design, cost estimation, remedy construction, and
operation and maintenance. Marc  has  a B.S. in  civil engineering  and an M.S. in environmental
engineering both from the University of Iowa.

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE SOURCE CONTROL AND TAILINGS PILE CLOSURE AT
THE ELIZABETH MINE SUPERFUND SITE, ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT

Andrew J. Boeckeler, P.G.1 (presenting author),]. Christopher Adams, P.E.1, Brett Kay1,
Edward Hathaway2 and Stephen Dunbar, P.E.3
^obis Engineering, Inc., 18 Chenell Drive, Concord, NH  03301
    Phone: 603-724-6224; Email: aboeckeler(fl),nobiseng.com
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, Boston, MA
3U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District, Concord, MA

Abstract:
The Elizabeth Mine Superfund Site, located in Orange County  in Central Vermont, is one of the
largest and most intact historic mining sites in New England. The Mine operated between 1830 and
1958, producing more than 50,000 tons of copper. Acid rock drainage (ARD)  and  dissolved metals
discharges from tailings, waste rock, and slag resulted in severe ecological impacts to downstream
streams and rivers. To reduce or eliminate  the  primary  ARD  sources, the  U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency implimented a non-time critical removal  action (NTCRA) targeting a 45-acre area
of tailings and waste  rock (TP-l/TP-2) containing over 3 million cubic yards (CY)  of waste as well
as several  satellite waste  areas.  The  NTCRA included the  construction of a  geosynthetic cap
consisting of double sided LLDPE geomembrane, high-transmissivity drainage geocomposite, and
vegetative support soils.

The TP-l/TP-2 containment construction began in 2011 with subgrade preparation to achieve slope
stability and drainage  requirements.  GPS-guided machinery was  used to automate grade control,
                                            48

-------
greatly reducing rework and manual surveying effort. A lime amendment rotating cylinder treatment
system was operated and maintained during the NTCRA to reduce iron and ARD impacts from
approximately 16 million gallons of TP-l/TP-2 leachate.  Other NTCRA activities included  the
construction of over 2 miles of surface water drainages, building demolition and hazardous materials
removal,  and  preservation  of  historically  sensitive  features.  The  waste  consolidation  and
geosynthetic cap installation was completed in 2012 and other NTCRA work is ongoing.

A Greening  Policy was  implemented  during closure construction and  restoration activities  to
promote green and sustainable practices. These practices included the use of biodiesel fuels  in
modified heavy equipment and on-site borrow and topsoil sources that eliminated the need for over
10,800 off-site truck deliveries. These  two  initiatives resulted in -500 tons of greenhouse gas
reductions. Environmentally  preferable products, such  as a  100 percent  biodegradable high
performance  flexible growth  medium,  were also selected to  support  the  Greening Policy. Site
restoration activities have included the restoration of satellite waste removal areas to natural habitats
using native soils  and seed mixtures to  encourage vegetative growth, and the return of native bird
species and pollinators. In addition, approximately 11 acres of wetlands have been constructed.

As  a result of the cap construction, TP-l/TP-2 leachate flow has declined from 55 gallons per
minute (GPM) to 22 GPM between 2011 and 2013. The  ultimate effectiveness of the TP-l/TP-2
closure is demonstrated by  a  90  percent reduction in  copper concentrations entering downstream
surface water, resulting in significant improvements to the quality of downstream water resources
and aquatic biota.

Bio:
Andy Boeckeler is Vice President of Engineering and Science at Nobis Engineering. For the past  17
years, he has  conducted investigations and remedial actions at numerous Superfund sites,  primarily
for EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers. His technical focus areas include fractured bedrock
hydrogeology, in-situ chemical oxidation,  isotope geochemistry, and  mine site  investigation and
remediation. Andy has a B.S.  in geology and an  M.S.  in geochemistry from the University of New
Hampshire.

PASSIVE INTERFLOW CONTROLS: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR WATER DIVERSION AT ABANDONED MINE
SITES

Gary Hazen1 (presenting author), Paul Hight2 and Mark Nelson3
JCDM Smith, 9200 Ward Parkway, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64114
    Phone: 816-444-8270; Email: hazengKojcdmsmi th.com
2Gilt Edge Mine, 2 Gilt Edge Road, Deadwood, SD 57732
    Phone: 605-578-1038; Email: hightpkfg.cdmsmith.com
3CDM Smith, 12445 Misty Meadows Road, Nemo, SD  57759
    Phone: 605-578-9739; Email: nelsonmrfSicdmsmith.com

Abstract:
Passive  interflow controls  (PICs) are a  simple yet significant improvement to  standard  best
management  practices (BMPs) commonly used at abandoned mine sites to minimize  generation  of
mining-influenced water (MIW). PICs were installed by CDM Smith at  an abandoned open pit gold
mine in the Black Hills of South  Dakota (herein referred to as "the site")  to replace surface water
diversion structures, a previously-existing BMP that addressed only the overland flow component of
runoff from  upgradient watershed areas. PICs improve performance of the water diversion
                                            49

-------
structures by addressing both the interflow component and the overland flow component of runoff
from these upgradient areas.

Runoff is defined as the proportion  of precipitation that reaches surface  water bodies  after a
precipitation or snow melt event. Runoff includes two components: overland flow and interflow.
Overland flow is  lateral movement of precipitation that occurs over the land surface. Interflow is
subsurface lateral movement of precipitation, which occurs due to contrasts in vertical hydraulic
conductivity, such as at the interface  between crystalline bedrock and overlying unconsolidated soil
or sediment. The U.S.  Geological Survey has  identified interflow  as a substantial component of
runoff and  a major contributor to  stream  flow in  areas  underlain by  crystalline igneous and
metamorphic bedrock in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Because this type of geology is common
in many mountainous mining regions throughout the world, interflow from areas upslope of mines
may be contributing to significant generation of MIW at abandoned mine sites.

By addressing both interflow and overland  flow, PICs  improve performance  of water diversion
systems, which reduce the volume of MIW  that  is generated through  interaction of runoff with
waste rock or other mine materials.  Monitoring data collected at the site after installation of PICs
show that these systems reduce the  annual volume of MIW requiring collection, management and
treatment by approximately 35  million gallons. PICs are inexpensive, passive in  operation and easy
to construct using readily  obtained  and  low-cost system components. The  PICs at  the  site are
constructed  of perforated  collection pipe placed within the  interflow zone, solid  transfer pipe,
aggregate, riprap, geotextile and soil.

PICs reduce the  overall environmental footprint  of  mine remediation through:  1)  a decrease in
power consumption for MIW management; 2) a decrease in chemical reagent consumption typically
used  during MIW treatment; 3) a  decrease  in the volume of MIW treatment sludge typically
generated; and 4) a  reduction in disturbance to the overall watershed hydrologic balance  by
conveying collected upgradient water into the watershed immediately downstream from the mine.
These environmental benefits  translate  into reductions  in  operation  and  maintenance  (O&M)
activities and related costs, and overall improvement in the sustainability of the remedy.

PICs should be designed to maximize  effectiveness of interflow diversion, reduce long-term O&M
requirements, and minimize  costs using  the concepts of gravity  flow and year-round  passive
operation. PIC design  can  be  modified  or adapted to  a wide range  of  site conditions and
topographies; thus they are widely applicable at many mine sites in mountainous regions and should
be considered as a standard BMP of any mine remediation program.

Bio:
Gary L. Hazen is a Senior Environmental  Engineer with CDM Smith in Kansas City, Missouri. Mr.
Hazen has 19 years of experience in  the investigation and remediation of contaminated waste sites
across the United States for private and governmental  clients, including dozens of large-scale mines.
While  Mr. Hazen has a diverse background in remediation, he specializes  in the study, design, and
successful reclamation of operating and abandoned mines  in a variety of locations. Mr. Hazen has
co-authored several publications and presentations for national and international conferences related
to the management and reclamation of abandoned hard rock mines.  Mr.  Hazen received a B.S. in
geological engineering (cum laude)  from the University of Missouri-Rolla, now known as Missouri
University of Science and Technology.  Mr. Hazen is also a licensed engineer  and/or geologist in
several Midwestern states including South Dakota and his home state of Missouri.
                                             50

-------
     Session 10:  Water Treatment  (cont.)
TREATABILITY STUDIES FOR ACIDIC MINING-INFLUENCED WATER

Angela K. Frandsen, P.E.1 (presenting author), Nicholas R. Anton, P.E.2, Douglas L. Miller,
P.E.3, Nathan T. Smith4 and David J. Reisman5
Environmental Engineer, COM Smith, 50 W. 14th Street, Suite 200, Helena, MT 59601
   Phone: 406-441-1435; Email: frandsenak@cdmsmith.com
Environmental Engineer, COM Smith, 555 17th Street, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80202
   Phone: 720-264-1147; Email: antonnr@cdmsmith.com
Environmental Engineer, COM Smith, 50 W. 14th Street, Suite 200, Helena, MT 59601
   Phone: 406-441-1408; Email: millerdl@cdmsmith.com
Environmental Scientist, COM Smith, 555 17th Street, Suite 1100, Denver, CO  80202
   Phone: 720-264-1124; Email: smithnt@cdmsmith.com
5Sr. Environmental Scientist, 8805 Governor's Hill Drive, Suite 305, Cincinnati, OH 45249
   Phone: 513-319-0489; Email: reismandi@cdmsmith.com

Abstract:
CDM Smith conducted treatability studies to evaluate passive treatment options  for acidic mining-
influenced water (MIW) at the Barker-Hughesville Mining  District National Priorities  List Site
(Barker) in  Montana and at the Blue  Ledge Mine Superfund Site in California (Blue Ledge). The
treatability studies were conducted as part  of the EPA  remedial investigation/feasibility studies
(RI/FS) to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatment  (i.e., alkaline  addition), various
passive/semi-passive pre-treatment technologies, and biochemical reactors (BCRs) to treat the acidic
MIWs  at these remote sites. The  studies provide  site-specific data that can be used  for analysis of
remedial alternatives and development of scaled designs and costs for the FS.

Prior to field testing, bench-scale studies were conducted on each site's MIW. Conventional and pre-
treatment titrations were completed with alkaline reagents on both site waters. Blue Ledge water was
used in proof-of-principle BCR batch  tests  conducted with several organic  and inorganic material
mixtures. The Barker bench study  included short-term column pre-treatment tests followed by BCR
batch tests.

Bench-testing was followed by construction of barrel pilot studies at each site. MIW was collected in
basins, fed by gravity to  feed tanks,  and  55-gallon  treatment barrels  filled with BCR substrate
mixtures. The Blue Ledge barrels consisted of two woody substrate BCR  mixtures,  a ChitoRem®
(mixture  of ground crab shells, calcium carbonate, and protein) BCR, a  successive alkalinity
producing system (SAPS), and an ethanol BCR.  The system was operated for 10 weeks in 2012 with
weekly sample  collection. Due to the short field season and inconclusive results, the system was re-
started in 2013. All substrates were replaced for a total of four  treatments: 1) woody substrate BCR;
2) SAPS pre-treatment followed by woody substrate BCR; 3) ChitoRem BCR; and 4)  ethanol BCR.
All substrate  mixtures were  revised based  on performance observed in 2012, flow rates were
modified, a pre-treatment SAPS was added, and an automated ethanol metering pump was installed.
The 2013 test was operated for 19 weeks with bi-weekly sample collection. Results indicate excellent
removal of aluminum, cadmium, copper, iron, and zinc for the ChitoRem® and ethanol BCRs, and
moderate removal in other BCRs potentially due to  acidity overloading.
                                           51

-------
Using lessons learned from the first year Blue Ledge study, the Barker test was designed with a focus
on  implementing effective pre-treatment to condition  the more acidic  MIW for BCR treatment.
Three pre-treatment methods were tested: 1) SAPS pre-treatment; 2) ChitoRem® pre-treatment; and
3) magnesium hydroxide pre-treatment. Each fed into a separate woody substrate BCR. A fourth
BCR without pre-treatment was  operated as a control. The Barker system was operated for 11 weeks
with bi-weekly sample collection. The short field  season limited the ability to assess data trends in
2013 and signs of acidity overloading were observed. A second year of the Barker study is planned
for summer 2014,  with  modifications that include  increased  barrel  retention  time,  substrate
composition  and  alkaline material  changes,  increased  study time  length, and  post-treatment
oxidation testing using a constructed wetland.

Bio:
Angela Frandsen is an Environmental Engineer, Project Manager, and team leader with CDM Smith
in Helena, Montana.  Her areas of expertise include supporting EPA on all aspects of the Superfund
process,  particularly at mining "megasites," with  a  focus  on  water quality impacts and mine water
treatment evaluations. Her project work has focused recently on the Barker Hughesville and Upper
Tenmile  Creek mining sites in  Montana, remote watershed sites severely impacted  by mine water
discharges.  Last year she served on the  Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC) group
to develop  national guidance on the use of biochemical reactors for  treatment of mining-influenced
waters. Angela has a B.S. in chemical engineering from Montana State University  and M.S. in
environmental engineering from  Montana Tech in  Butte, Montana.

INNOVATIVE BIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR TOOLS APPLIED TO MINE
WASTE ISSUES

Brady Lee (presenting author} and Hope Lee
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Phone: 509-371-7142; Email: brady.lee@.pnnl.gov

Abstract:
Disposal of wastes associated with plutonium-separation  and uranium recovery operations at U.S.
DOE sites  has led to the contamination of millions of cubic meters of soil and sediment as well as
groundwater associated  with these sites.  Contaminant plumes contain mixtures of  radionuclides,
such as uranium, technetium-99, iodine-129 and  tritium. In addition, metals such as  chromium and
other chemicals  such  as  nitrate  and  sulfate,  are  often  found  co-mingled  with  radionuclide
contamination. This complex and extensive contamination has  led to  the development of an array of
innovative remediation and monitoring tools that  could be readily adapted for use in abandoned and
currently operating  mine  sites.  While  physical,  chemical   and biological remedies  have  been
developed,   this  presentation will  focus  on  bioremediation  tools  developed  for  metals  and
radionuclides  for  water  treatment,  as  well  molecular  tools  developed  to  monitor  microbial
communities important  for remediating  sites. In  addition, potential  application of similar tools for
beneficiation of tailings and low grade ores will also be discussed.

Metal and   radionuclide bioremediation technologies  discussed will  include  direct  and indirect
transformation technologies, as well as removal of metals in solution  through biosorptive processes.
Contaminants, such as  technetium, chromium and uranium can be removed from  solution through
reductive processes catalyzed by the oxidation of simple and complex  carbon  sources by anaerobic
bacteria.  Similar reductive processes, such as sulfate reduction, can lead to the indirect precipitation
of metals in solution through the production of sulfide which  complexes with the metals and
                                            52

-------
precipitates as metal sulfides.  Finally, metals in solution can be removed via biosorption to microbial
cells which can  then be  separated  from  solution  concentrating and  removing contamination.
Examples of past and ongoing research focusing on these individual technologies will be discussed.

Molecular tools, such  as  quantitative polymerase  chain reaction (qPCR) and fluorescent in  situ
hybridization (FISH) have been developed  to target microbial  communities active in metal  and
radionuclide remediation, allowing optimization of remedial processes. In addition, high-throughput
molecular techniques such as  metagenomes can be used to  characterize phylogenetic and functional
diversity in microbial communities in contaminated environments. These molecular tools could be
applied to develop and optimize treatment strategies for wastes associated with abandoned mines.

Finally,  application of these  techniques for  recovery  and/or purification of metals or rare earth
elements from mine tailings will be discussed.

Bio:
Brady is a Senior Staff Scientist in the Energy and Environment Directorate at the Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory. For the past  25 years he has  gained experience in management and technical
oversight of numerous U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),  U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and
private industry supported projects. Mr.  Lee has performed  research scaling from the laboratory
bench to field-scale application. He has acted as principal investigator and directed  projects related
to the development of bioprocesses  for the treatment of  environmental contamination, including
chlorinated  solvents,  petroleum  hydrocarbons  and  metals  and  radionu elides.  Numerous
microbiological and molecular techniques were developed and employed during this  research. Brady
has nearly 40  publications cataloging his environmental and industrial research activity, as well as
patents  and  awards  related  to  industrial and environmental  processes.  Brady has  an M.S. in
microbiology from the Idaho State University, and is currently working on his Ph.D.

ELECTRO-BIOCHEMICAL REACTOR WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATES LOW SELENIUM AND OTHER METAL EFFLUENTS IN
HARD ROCK MINING WASTEWATERS

M. Peoples, A. Opara (presenting author} and D. J. Adams1
Inotec, LLC
2712 S. 3600 W., Suite A, Salt  Lake City, UT 841 19
      : 801-966-9694; Email:  jadams@inotec.us
Abstract:
Selenium is a naturally occurring element and often associated with sulfide metal ore deposits in low
to  high  concentrations.  Management  of  selenium  containing groundwaters,  concentrated  in
underground works, and mill processing waters influenced by various flotation reagents including
frothers,  activators,  depressants and pH adjusting agents are difficult challenges  for wastewater
treatment to low ppb discharge criteria.

The Electro-Biochemical  Reactor  (EBR)  is a biological water treatment system based  on redox
reactions  that  directly  supplies  electrons  to  the microbes and reactor  environment.  Where
conventional biotreatment systems rely  on chemicals and  excess  nutrients  to  provide  required
electrons, the EBR technology provides many of the electrons directly, significantly reducing  the
amount  of  nutrients  (electron  donor)  needed.  Electrons  needed for  microbial  contaminant
transformations are directly supplied using an applied voltage potential of 1 to 3 volts  and very low
current; 1 mA supplies 6.24X1015 electrons per second. These electrons represent a 'free'  energy
                                             53

-------
source that is available independent of microbial nutrient metabolism. The provided electrons make
bioreactors  more  controllable,  economical  and  robust  than  past  generations  of conventional
biological treatment systems. Moreover, the  directly supplied electrons result in better bioreactor
performance;  enhanced  contaminant transformation  kinetics  and  better  performance  at  low
temperatures.

EBR technology was evaluated at bench- and pilot-scale  for selenium removal at an underground
zinc, lead, copper, gold and silver mine in the Yukon  Territory, Canada. The selenium-containing
wastewaters also had high  levels  of residual  flotation reagents and other co-contaminants, such as
cyanides, Sb, Cd, Cu, Pb, Mo, Ag, and Zn that needed to be removed to meet mine water discharge
criteria. Selenium  concentrations ranged  from  2 to  >4  mg/L;  the mine  discharge  criteria for
selenium is 20 ug/L. Environment Canada's best available technology, and other examined selenium
removal technologies, had not been successful at meeting selenium or other contaminant discharge
criteria at this site.  Both the bench- and pilot-scale EBR system demonstrated an average 99 percent
Se removal to <2.0 ug/L, significantly exceeding the discharge standard for selenium and other co-
contaminants present. Average  co-contaminant removals of 93.5 percent to 99.7 percent  were
achieved during both bench- and pilot-scale tests.

Based on successful onsite pilot-scale EBR technology validation, a full-scale design is underway and
construction is  expected to be completed during 2015.  The EBR process offers an economical
solution  for  difficult to treat  mining  influenced wastewaters containing  selenium and/or  other
metals and inorganics.

Bio:
Ola  Opara  is the R&D Manager  at Inotec. With  over  5 years of experience, she  directs the
Bioprocess Development Laboratory, which focuses  on testing and implementation  of water
treatment technologies in the mining industry. Ola has  been actively involved in development of an
Electro-Biochemical  Reactor  technology,  from  bench  and  pilot-scale  tests  to  a  full-scale
implementation. She has published papers in peer-reviewed and trade journals,  and presented her
research at the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME) conferences. Ola has a Ph.D.
in environmental engineering from a joint graduate program at the Department of Metallurgical
Engineering and the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Utah. She  currently holds an
Adjunct Assistant Professor position at the University of Utah, where she teaches classes on energy
resources, water issues and sustainability.
                                             54

-------
                 Session 11:  Source Control  /
            Mine Closure Approaches  (cont.)
ADVANCES IN GROUND WATER REMEDIATION AND MODELING FOR
MINING-RELATED CONTAMINANTS

Michael Truex1 (presenting author), Steve Yabusaki and Dawn Wellman
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
'Phone:  509-371-7072; Email: mj.truexfgjpnnl.gov

Abstract:
Contamination of groundwater  by  metals  and radionuclides  such  as  uranium is  prevalent at
Department  of Energy  sites. Significant effort has  been applied to  developing remediation  and
management approaches for these plumes, much of which is relevant to  mining sites. Geochemical
manipulation technologies to create permeable reactive  barriers or for  source treatment can be
important components of addressing contaminant plumes.  Several examples will be  discussed to
provide  technology information  and design factors. While  it  is important  to evaluate individual
technology performance, recent efforts have highlighted the importance of understanding natural
attenuation processes and use of appropriate  enhancements to these processes as a remediation
strategy. With recognition of the complexity of many sites,  adaptive  remediation management and
the associated predictive assessments and monitoring approaches  advancements have been made.
These remediation strategies will be discussed in the context of mining site applications.

A key element for successful groundwater  remediation is developing a suitable conceptual-model-
based understanding of the site and applying this  understanding to developing the remediation
strategy. For instance, field and laboratory studies conducted  at a shallow  former uranium/vanadium
mill tailings site and  a deep uranium in situ recovery site have demonstrated that biostimulation of
indigenous microorganisms can effectively remove uranium, as well as vanadium and selenium  from
groundwater.  Remedy design elements were based on  understanding of site-specific conditions,
including information about electron acceptors  and microorganisms present and information about
the biogeochemistry response to the  biologically-mediated reactions. Field-scale coupled-process
modeling was applied to provide a systematic and  mechanistic framework for understanding the
interplay of geochemical and biological reactions as a basis for the restoration design strategy. These
examples of recent advances in remediation approaches related to Department of Energy efforts,
highlighting the uranium mill tailings site as a case study, will  be discussed in the context of potential
groundwater remediation and modeling applications associated with mining sites.

Bio:
Mr. Truex has 22 years  of experience  at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in remediation
research and field applications. His experience includes providing  clients  with technical support for
remediation decisions through technology assessments, applications of numerical fate and transport
modeling, and feasibility and treatability assessments. He specializes in evaluation and application of
in situ  remediation and attenuation-based  remedies. Field  experience includes  work at  U.S.
Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Defense and private remediation sites.
                                          55

-------
HYDROLOGIC AND WATER-QUALITY EFFECTS OF THE DINERO TUNNEL
BULKHEAD, SUGAR LOAF MINING DISTRICT, NEAR LEADVILLE, COLORADO:
IMPLICATIONS FOR MONITORING REMEDIATION

Katherine Walton-Day1 (presenting author), Taylor J. Mills2, Kato T. Dee3, Craig Bissonnette4
and Melissa Srneins5
'U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 415, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO  80225
    Phone: 303-236-6930; Email: kwaltond@usgs.gov
2U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 415, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO  80225
    Phone: 303-236-6897; Email: tmills@usgs.gov
3Colorado Mountain College, Leadville, CO 80461
    Phone: 719-486-4222; Email: kdee@coloradomtn.edu
4Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety, Leadville, CO  80461
    Phone: 970-445-8635; Email: craig.bissonnette@state.co.us
5Bureau of Land Management, Canon City, CO 81212
    Phone: 719-269-8523; Email: msmeins@blm.gov

Abstract:
Dinero tunnel is an abandoned, draining mine tunnel located in the Sugar Loaf Mining District near
Leadville, Colorado, and is a major  contributor to zinc and  manganese loads in Lake Fork Creek, a
tributary to the Arkansas River. Consequently, in 2009, a bulkhead was installed in Dinero tunnel to
reduce mine drainage and  improve water quality and aquatic  habitat downstream  in Lake Fork
Creek.  A  spatially  detailed  monitoring program  enabled characterization  of hydrologic  and
geochemical changes resulting from bulkhead emplacement. These changes  included  increased
discharge and decreased water quality (lower pH, and  higher zinc  and manganese concentrations) in
the two  surface drainages  adjacent to the ridge containing Dinero tunnel  and its bulkhead. In
addition, similar changes also occurred in Nelson tunnel,  another abandoned mine tunnel that  is
likely  hydrologically connected to Dinero  tunnel via a mineralized vein, but not by mine workings.
In  spite of this local water-quality  degradation, bulkhead  emplacement  caused reductions  in
discharge and  metal loading at Dinero tunnel sufficient to improve water quality downstream in
Lake Fork Creek except during extreme high flow. Sustained or increased water-quality degradation
in Nelson tunnel and  in the drainages  adjacent to  Dinero tunnel could decrease or negate the
improvement that has occurred in  Lake  Fork Creek.  Continued water-quality monitoring can help
provide information about the balance between the positive and negative water-quality effects of the
bulkhead that,  if necessary, can be  used to make decisions  about potential  future remediation
actions. Although the study is specific to Dinero tunnel, the monitoring approach and  the results
emphasize  how  detailed  hydrologic  and  water-quality   monitoring  of  remediation  provides
information about the sometimes unanticipated effects of remediation. This information can be used
to  assess the  effectiveness of remediation  and  also  inform future  decisions  about  additional
remediation actions, if necessary.

Bio:
Katie  Walton-Day holds bachelor's (Smith College), and master's and doctoral degrees (Colorado
School of Mines) in geology. After a brief stint in the metal-exploration industry, she joined the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) in  1983 and is currently a research Hydrologist. During her USGS career
she has focused on understanding metal transport and transformation in historic and active mining
areas  and in understanding the environmental effects of remediation of mine sites. She currently
leads the Hard Rock and Uranium Mining Project in the Toxic Substances Hydrology Program at
USGS.
                                            56

-------
IN-SITU NITRATE AND SELENIUM REDUCTION/STABILIZATION WITHIN
COAL WASTE ROCK: BENCH-SCALE EVALUATION

A. Opara1 (presenting author), M. J. Peoples and D. J. Adams
Inotec, LLC
2712 S. 3600 W., Suite A, Salt Lake City, UT 84119; Phone: 801-966-9694
^mail: oopara@,inotec.us

Abstract:
The weathering of coal mine waste  rock releases selenium and  other  co-contaminants, such  as
sulfate and iron, into the seepage waters. Additionally, various levels  of nitrate are released into these
waters from residual blasting compounds. Since nitrate is the preferred electron acceptor in nitrate
and selenium containing waters,  effective management  approaches  for water treatment should
include in situ denitrification treatments to reduce nitrate loads. In situ  denitrification treatment also
holds promise for significant selenium reduction and stabilization within  the source materials; both
of which could significantly reduce active treatment CAPEX and OPEX costs.

To  reduce treatment costs, especially where higher nitrate  concentrations  are present, INOTEC has
proposed a  combined nitrate/selenium management strategy for water treatment  at coal mining
sites.  In  situ  nitrate reduction has  been successfully implemented at full-scale at several U.S. gold
mining sites. For  example, amended Electro-Biochemical Reactor (EBR)  water treatment system
effluents  have been used to inoculate waste rock in place and waste rock as it is mined and placed in
depositories.  This approach   has  a  potential  for both  immediate  and  long-term  contaminant
reductions to active treatment systems,  along with reduced active treatment costs.

A column testing program for coal  mining  waste rock was designed based  on screening results
obtained. Three bench-scale columns  were constructed with the following goals: 1)  EBR effluent,
treating mine waters, was used to produce an amended microbial inoculum for the in-situ column
nitrate/selenium reduction tests; 2) a control, down-flow column filled with coal waste  rock source
materials was used to determine baseline selenium  and nitrate elution  rates; and  3)  down-flow
columns  filled with coal waste rock source materials was inoculated periodically with EBR amended
effluents  to evaluate in-situ denitrification and selenium reduction/stabilization.

Average  nitrate concentration in the control column effluent was 20 mg/L, while it was below the
detection limit in the EBR  inoculated  column effluent. Average selenium  concentration in the
control column effluent was 25 ug/L, with initial concentrations as high  as 33 ug/L and stabilizing
with time at around 20 ug/L. The average Se concentration in the  EBR effluent inoculated column
was 2.7 ug/L.

The holistic  approach  proposed by  the INOTEC team includes integration of source control
measures (in-situ  nitrate  reduction and selenium stabilization) and  active treatment  processes for a
comprehensive water flow management.  Active  EBR bench-scale  and onsite  pilot-scale treatment
systems were used to treat five British Columbia coal mine wastewaters;  influent Se concentrations
ranged from  35 |J.g/L to 531  |J.g/L. Se treatment targets for the tested waters  ranged from 5 to  10
|j.g/L.  Mean  EBR effluent Se  concentrations ranged from 0.5 |J.g/L to  1.4 |^g/L. Average influent
NO3-N concentrations varied between 11 and 170 mg/L and were  removed to below 1  mg/L in  all
the performed tests.
                                             57

-------
The test data demonstrate that a holistic approach using the in-situ reduction/stabilization and the
active treatment using the EBR technology is an effective nitrate and  Se removal option for British
Columbia's coal-mining wastewaters.

Bio:
Ola Opara is  the  R&D Manager at Inotec. With  over 5 years  of experience, she  directs the
Bioprocess Development Laboratory, which focuses  on  testing  and implementation of water
treatment technologies in the mining industry. Ola has  been actively involved in a development of
an  Electro-Biochemical  Reactor  technology, from  bench and pilot-scale tests to  a full-scale
implementation. She has published papers  in peer-reviewed and trade journals, and presented her
research at the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME)  conferences. Ola has a Ph.D.
in environmental engineering from a joint graduate  program at the  Department of Metallurgical
Engineering and the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Utah. She currently holds an
Adjunct Assistant Professor position at the University of Utah, where she teaches classes on energy
resources, water issues and sustainability.
     Session  12:  Water Treatment (cont.)
IRON MOUNTAIN MINE SUPERFUND SITE - LONG TERM O&M CHALLENGES

James Sickles
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-972-3265; Email: sickles.james@,epa.gov

Abstract:
Nearly 100 years of mining at the Iron Mountain Mine Site in Shasta County, California resulted in
multiple waste rock and tailings piles, extensive  fracturing of the formations overlying extensive
mine workings  and  remaining sulfide ore bodies, and created  sinkholes, seeps  and contaminated
sediments in adjacent water bodies, particularly the Sacramento River. The extensive workings and
fractured rock create extremely effective  pathways for water and air to reach the massive sulfide
deposits, which are oxidized  and produce mining-influenced water (MIW), with  pH as low as -3.6
and released  heavy  metals averaging  10,000  pounds  of iron, 650 pounds of copper, and 1,800
pounds of zinc per day into the surrounding drainages and water bodies before remediation reduced
the metals loading by more than 97 percent.

The site remedy consists of five major components: 1) MIW collection systems consisting of sumps,
drains in the  Richmond and  Lawson Adits, extraction wells and a surface water  retention reservoir
and surface water controls; 2) MIW conveyance systems consisting of pipelines carrying MIW to the
Minnesota Flats Treatment Plant; 3) clean water diversion systems; 4) mine waste disposal facilities
comprised of Brick Flat Pit, various waste  rock cells, and  a  confined disposal facility used for
dredged precipitates, which formed in the  Spring Creek Arm of Keswick Reservoir; and 5) the MIW
treatment plant, which is a lime neutralization/high density sludge facility at Minnesota Flats. All of
these  components  experience extremely  acidic conditions, widely varying temperatures and flow
volumes, due to intense high-runoff storm events, and need to  address the expected generation of
MIW for the next 1,800 years.
                                           58

-------
Unusual O&M issues at the site are comprised of: a) the formation of mineral precipitates in MIW
conveyance pipelines due to microbial Fe(II) oxidation of the MIW, within periods of less than an
hour, resulting in  reductions of up to 40  percent of the pipe capacity and  causing spills; b) the
accelerated deterioration of the urethane liner for the  Upper Spring Creek Diversion, which diverts
uncontaminated water to Flat Creek, due to an  elevation drop of 280 feet along its route, which
generates  flows of 70 ft/sec  versus the typical 15 ft/sec  design  flows  for  such  systems; c) the
significant loss of filtrate  from the lined Brick  Flat Pit, used to store the HDS sludge  from the
treatment plant, implying that the land fill is leaking into mine workings below; and d) the ongoing
deterioration  of the concrete ore chute plugs in  the Richmond Adit along with the location of the
Lawson Adit in the Boulder Creek landslide, both of which are key parts of the MIW collection
systems.

Unique to Iron Mountain is the O&M issue of the ongoing deterioration of the MIW collection
system in the Richmond Adit. The Richmond Adit, characterized by pH ranging from 0.6 to 1.4
(and lower in the stopes  above),  was  rehabilitated in 1989-1990 and 2001-2003, resulting in the
current system of the  5-Way catch basin (sump)  where  four haulage drifts  intersect, located
approximately 1,400 feet inside the adit portal. Timber and stainless steel dams were installed in the
drifts to collect MIW and muck, which is  the term for the waste rock, mine debris and the  fine-
grained, silty  and  pyritic quick material found throughout the workings. In portions  of the haulage
drifts 22 ore  chutes from  the  mine stopes above were plugged with concrete and shotcrete due to
past surges of up to 3,000 gallons  of extremely acidic  MIW and mine debris. Current seepage  from
the failing ore chute  plugs ranges from 1  to 2  gallons per minute (gpm) with the more severely
compromised plugs seeping at 5 to 10 gpm. EPA is working to  address the problems through the
creation of an electronic database with 3-D mapping based  on historical maps to better understand
the location of MIW in workings and driving forces in the structural integrity of the mine.

Bio:
James  M. Sickles  is a Remedial Project Manager in the Superfund Division  of  the  U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency in Region 9 located in San Francisco, California. In this role, he
oversees Superfund projects such as the operations and management oversight of the Iron Mountain
Mine Site and is leading the investigation and remediation of the Klau/Buena Vista Mines Site. As a
geologist he has worked in mineral and petroleum exploration and started in environmental geology
in 1990 in consulting and working for the EPA since  2002. Past environmental work has involved
investigation  and  cleanup ranging from closing military bases to  abandoned mine sites. James has
B.A. degree in geology from  Sonoma State University  (1970) and M.Sc.  from the  University of
California, Davis (1974) and is a Certified Geologist in the State of California since 1992.

CHARACTERIZATION AND REMEDIATION OF IRON(III) OXIDE-RICH SCALE
IN A PIPELINE CARRYING ACID MINE DRAINAGE AT IRON MOUNTAIN MINE,
CALIFORNIA, U.S.A.

Kate M. Campbell1* (presenting author)^ Charlie Alpers2, D. Kirk Nordstrom1 and Alex Blum1
'U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine Street, Suite  E127, Boulder, CO 80303
2U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA
*Phone: 303-541-3035; Email: kcampbell(g),usgs.gov

Abstract:
A pipeline carrying acid mine  drainage (AMD) to the treatment plant at the Iron Mountain Mine
Superfund Site (California, U.S.A.) has developed  substantial scaling over the past  several years,
resulting in spillage of AMD and requiring frequent and costly clean-out. The objectives of this work
                                            59

-------
are to characterize the pipe scale  composition, identify biogeochemical processes leading to  its
formation, and identify possible strategies to prevent or retard its formation in the pipeline. Samples
of the scale and AMD water samples  from five points along the pipeline were collected prior to
clean-out during a low-flow period  in  August 2012. Additional AMD samples will be  collected at
various  times  during  high-flow  conditions to evaluate  seasonal variation in water chemistry and
possible effects on scale formation.  The mineralogy and microbial community of the scale samples
were  characterized. The  scale is composed  predominantly of hydrous ferric  oxides; goethite is
present  according to  powder X-ray diffraction  along with  poorly  crystalline phases,  primarily
schwertmannite.  Additional solid phase characterization is  planned  using other methods. For the
low-flow sampling, the influent AMD into the pipeline where scale had formed had a pH of 2.6 and
contained 25 mM Fe(H). Measurable Fe(H) oxidation (approximately 30 percent) was observed as
the water flowed from the start of the pipeline to the treatment plant, taking approximately one hour
to travel five km. The pipeline was  lined with scale 2-7 cm thick, which had accumulated over 3-4
years. Laboratory batch experiments with fresh AMD from the site showed that scale formation was
caused by microbial oxidation of Fe(H) to Fe(III), and that the rate of Fe(H) oxidation  increased
once  scale had  been established. A biogeochemical  model using PHREEQC was  developed  to
simulate  the  rates and processes involved in  scale formation. Potential remediation options  to
prevent scale formation are to lower the pH  of the influent AMD by continuously mixing it with
water from the Richmond portal (approximate pH 0.5-1.0) or to periodically flush the pipeline with
Richmond portal water. The potential viability of these options will be evaluated in laboratory batch
experiments with AMD from the pipeline and the Richmond portal, mixed with scale removed from
the pipeline.

Bio:
Kate Campbell is a biogeochemist with the National Research Program of the Water Mission Area,
U.S.  Geological  Survey, Boulder, Colorado. She received a B.S. in chemistry from  Georgetown
University and an M.S. and  Ph.D.  in  environmental  engineering from the  California  Institute  of
Technology. She worked on bioremediation of uranium for her postdoctoral work at the  USGS in
Menlo Park,  California before joining  the chemical modeling of acid waters group. Her research
focuses  on abiotic and biotic  redox  chemistry of natural waters, including acid  rock  drainage,
geothermal waters, and groundwaters; biogeochemical modeling of kinetically controlled processes,
especially iron, arsenic, antimony, and uranium redox  chemistry; coupled  biotic-abiotic controls on
microbial ecology in geothermal and mining environments; and novel sampling techniques  for redox
processes for field application.

TACKLING AMD, MINING IMPACTED GROUND WATER, PRIVATE MINE
OWNERSHIP IN A SUPERFUND SITE THAT SPANS THE PANHANDLE

Bill Adams1, Kim Prestbo2 and Ed Moreen, P.E.3 (presenting author)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
'1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, M/S ECL 113, Seattle, WA 98101
   Phone: 206-553-2806; Email: adams.bill@,epa.gov
2Phone: 206-553-0239; Email: prestbo.kim@epa.gov
3Phone: 208-664-4588; Email: moreen.ed@epa.gov

Abstract:
The Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site is located within one of the
largest and most productive historical  mining districts in  the world. The Site, which spans the
panhandle of  Idaho  and extends along the Spokane  River in Washington,  resulted from historic
disposal practices that  led to the mining-related hazardous substances being dispersed in nearly every
                                            60

-------
aspect of the environment. The facility was placed on the NPL in  1983 and has been undergoing
remediation for several decades. During this time excellent progress has been made  from both an
aesthetic and risk reduction standpoint but many more years of work are necessary to fully achieve
the cleanup goals for human health and water quality standards.

Through the bankruptcy of the Gulf Resources and Chemical Company in 1983 and subsequent
PRPs, EPA ended up being responsible  for the defunct Bunker Hill Lead Smelter Complex, which
included a zinc plant, acid, fertilizer and phosphorus plants and the Central Treatment Plant (CTP).
EPA  has been operating that plant since 1995, which now treats acid mine drainage from the
Bunker Hill Mine  at a flow rate of 2 million gallons per day. As a result of the cleanup actions
undertaken by EPA and  Idaho Department of Environmental Quality to address exposure to lead
and other heavy metals, there has been a  significant decline in blood lead levels to  national averages.
However, due to the direct discharge of heavy metals into the environment from the Mine and the
construction of a 220 acre Central Impoundment Area (CIA) by the Bunker Hill Company into the
channel of the South Fork of the Coeur d'Alene River (SFCDR),  significant loading of dissolved
metals continues to occur.  This area accounts for approximately 40 percent of all  the zinc metal
loading in the Upper Basin and is the most significant metal loader of any other reach or tributary to
the SFCDR.

In 2012 EPA issued the Upper Basin Record of Decision Amendment (UB ROD A) that called for
upgrading the aging and outdated  CTP,  which was  originally  constructed  by  the Bunker Hill
Company in  1974  for the treatment of AMD  from the Bunker Hill  Mine and industrial discharges
from  the Bunker  Hill Industrial Complex. The  selected remedy  of the RODA  called  for the
collection of groundwater that comes into contact with contaminants under the CIA and the alluvial
aquifer that releases dissolved metals to  the SFCDR. EPA will treat this water in addition to that
from  the Bunker Hill Mine in an upgraded CTP that meets current required  discharge criteria. In
addition to  the technical challenges add in a mine that is owned and operated by a private party, who
has had history of being non-cooperative, and that has significant fractures at the  surface that results
in an entire sub-drainage completely infiltrating into the  mine and seasonally increasing the flows
from the mine by a factor 2 to 3.

This presentation will provide a little history on this famous and storied site and EPA ownership
and management of a treatment plant. It will also provide an in depth look at the 2MGD+ Acid
Mine  Drainage water quality, the groundwater  collection system being designed that will almost
double the flows  to  be treated at the CTP, and  recent optimization study and value engineering
exercise that were pursued to ensure the most cost effective remedial action.

Bio:
Ed Moreen is a licensed Civil Engineer in Idaho and a 1994 graduate of Washington State University
in civil/environmental engineering. Ed has worked for the EPA since 2003. Prior to joining EPA, he
was employed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a project engineer working at the  Hanford
Nuclear  Reservation,  civil  works  projects  and Bunker  Hill  Superfund  Site.   Ed's   current
responsibilities include management and upgrade  of the  Central Treatment Plant in Kellogg and
investigating  contaminated  sediment transport in  the Lower Coeur d'Alene  River  Basin.  Ed has
coauthored  several formal  presentations  and posters  including: Channel-Floodplain  Sediment
Dynamics and the  Redistribution of Contaminated Mine Wastes in the Lower Coeur D'Alene River,
Idaho  — River Restoration  Northwest, January  2012; Channel-Floodplain Sediment Dynamics and
the Movement of  Contaminated Mine Wastes in the Lower Coeur D'Alene River, Idaho  — ASCE,
Water Resources  Congress 2014; Bunker  Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site
Transformations of the Landscape — National Association of Remedial Project Managers 2012. In
                                            61

-------
2013 Ed was a member of recipient teams for The Superfund Team of the Year and National
Notable Achievement Award for Community Engagement. He was personally awarded the 2014
Silver Eagle Award "Communicator of the Year Award" for EPA Region 10.
                                         62

-------
Presentation Abstracts
           and
      Speaker Bios
   Thursday. August 14. 2014
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^™^^^^^^^^^^^™^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^~

-------
               Session 13: Beneficial  Use
EXTRACTION OF USEFUL RESOURCES FROM MINING-INFLUENCED WATER
(MIW)

D. Kirk Nordstrom1 and Kathleen S. Smith2
U.S. Geological Survey
'3215 Marine Street, Boulder, CO 80303; Phone: 303-541-3037; Email: dkn@usgs.gov
'Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25046, MS 964D, Denver, CO  80225
    Phone: 303-236-5788; Email: ksmith@usgs.gov

Presented by Kate Campbell, Ph.D.
U.S. Geological Survey
3215 Marine Street, Suite  E127, Boulder, CO 80303
Phone: 303-541-3035; Email: kcampbell@usgs.gov

Abstract:
Mining-influenced water  such as acid mine drainage  could be  a  source of hydrogen, metals,  and
sulfur for energy and commercial products. For example, discharge from the Richmond Tunnel at
Iron Mountain, California and the Reynolds adit at the Summitville mine, Colorado,  each release
between 30 and 200 metric tons per year of dissolved copper. Instead of treating this drainage water
with lime or limestone to produce an uneconomic sludge, the copper and other metals could be
recovered  and recycled  into  copper resources for commercial products. The challenge is  (1) to
separate the valuable components from  each other in a manner that is efficient and economically
viable,  (2) to  stockpile components in an environmentally safe manner, and (3) to transport the
components to an industry that can use  them as source material for production. Every site must be
assessed individually to  ascertain what  types of  extraction,  stockpiling, and transport  are most
appropriate.

From  a  brief  literature   review,   potential  extraction  techniques   include   electrochemical,
microbiological, and evaporative methods, as well as precipitation, solvent extraction, ion exchange,
and reverse osmosis. Many of these techniques have been tried before with variable and usually
limited success either from an economic or technical perspective. However, from the point of view
of getting  aqueous contaminants  out of the environment and  into  recycled production, these
technologies may be  considered effective. With  considerable  emphasis on  sustainable practices
today, these techniques  need to be  evaluated, improved,  and  further developed alone  and in
combination for both inactive and active mine sites.

Electrochemical techniques offer considerable versatility  but can  suffer from competing electrode
reactions and high energy demands  depending on the type of cells used. Copper cementation, which
takes advantage of electrochemical replacement of scrap iron by copper, is a very old, efficient, and
inexpensive technique that could be used at Iron Mountain and Summitville and many other mine
sites without applying  electrical current.  At many mine sites, tailings and/or waste-rock piles could
be run through a copper cementation or solvent extraction plant. With the application of current in
specially designed electrochemical cells, hydrogen gas can be obtained as well as selective removal of
metals depending on pH and composition of the solution. Fuel  cells can be built based on  iron
oxidation and oxygen reduction.
                                           64

-------
Microbial bioreactors have been built for sulfate reduction to produce aqueous sulfide, which can be
used to precipitate metal sulfides. Recent investigations have shown that microbial sulfate reduction
can be accomplished at relatively low pH (circa 3-4). The metal sulfides can then be transported to
smelters  for metal recovery. Bioreactors also oxidize dissolved ferrous iron and precipitate ferric
iron. With careful control of pH, sulfate concentration, and ratios of ferrous to ferric iron, different
iron phases can be precipitated that include schwertmannite, jarosite, goethite, and magnetite with
variable recovery of other metals.

Most sites considered for possible resource extraction of MIW will require a combination of several
techniques. For inactive mines, the  capital  outlay for an optimal design could be expensive and
difficult to fund. However,  for active or planned mines, resource-recovery techniques could be
introduced to  decrease environmental contamination, provide an additional source of income, and
reduce future liability.

Bio:
Kate Campbell is a biogeochemist with the National Research Program of the Water Mission Area,
U.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, Colorado. She received a B.S. in chemistry from  Georgetown
University and an M.S. and Ph.D.  in  environmental engineering from the  California Institute of
Technology. She worked on bioremediation  of uranium for her postdoctoral work at the USGS in
Menlo Park, California before  joining the chemical modeling of acid waters group. Her research
focuses on abiotic  and  biotic  redox chemistry of natural  waters, including acid rock drainage,
geothermal waters, and groundwaters; biogeochemical modeling of kinetically controlled processes,
especially iron, arsenic, antimony, and uranium redox chemistry; coupled biotic-abiotic controls on
microbial ecology in  geothermal and mining  environments; and novel sampling techniques for redox
processes for field application.

LARGE-SCALE TREATMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EFFLUENTS USING MINE
DRAINAGE RESIDUALS

Philip L. Sibrell, Ph.D.
U.S. Geological Survey, Leetown Science Center
11649LeetownRoad, Kearneysville, WV 25430
Phone: 304-724-4426; Email: psibrell(g),usgs.gov

Abstract:
Disposal of the  residuals generated by neutralizing acid mine drainage often constitutes a significant
fraction of the operating costs  of mine drainage treatment plants. Alternative uses for these waste
iron and aluminum  oxides would not only  decrease operating costs  for mine drainage treatment
plants, but would  also  open  up markets  for any newly developed  valuable  by-products. One
promising  possibility  for the  reuse  of these waste  materials is  the treatment of agricultural
wastewaters for  the removal  of phosphorus (P). Release  of P  from  animal  operations,  crop
production, and aquaculture growers has   had  deleterious  impacts  on  receiving  water  bodies
worldwide, including the Chesapeake Bay and the  Gulf of Mexico. We are testing this approach to
remove P  from a recirculating aquaculture  operation  using a  large-scale (over 200,000 gallons per
day) treatment plant at the  Leetown Science Center, in Kearneysville, West Virginia.  In this plant,
mine drainage residuals from the Blue Valley mine drainage  treatment plant,  near Brandy Camp,
Pennsylvania,  are used in gravity flow  contactors as a  sorbent to remove soluble P from the
wastewater. The media was  prepared by  air  drying the residuals as-received from the  filter press at
the mine drainage treatment plant, followed  by screening and crushing of oversize material to give a
particulate media with a size range of 5 to 30 mesh (4 to  0.6 mm). Saturation of the media with P
                                             65

-------
depends on influent flow rate  and P concentration, and  can take  from 10 to 60 days. After the
sorbent has reached saturation, the P is stripped and the media regenerated using a 1.0 M sodium
hydroxide  solution, followed by  a tap  water rinse, and then returned to service.  The  P can be
precipitated from the stripping solution by  adding calcium chloride, resulting in  the  formation of
hydroxyapatite,  a  potentially  saleable  fertilizer product, thus  recycling the  P content of  the
wastewater. The purpose of this demonstration plant is to show the feasibility of the process at an
operational scale.

Bio:
Philip L. Sibrell, Ph.D. is a Research Engineer with the U.S. Geological  Survey, at the  Leetown
Science Center  in Kearneysville,  WV. He is  currently investigating the application of acid mine
drainage residuals for the recovery of phosphate from agricultural and municipal wastewaters. Prior
to his employment with the USGS, Dr. Sibrell worked at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, the
U.S. Bureau of Mines, and in the mining  industry, as an engineer conducting research in resource
recovery and  environmental restoration.  He is  also a Professional Engineer, and has  over  100
publications and presentations.  He received  his B.S. from  the Colorado  School of Mines, and M.S.
and Ph.D. from the University of Utah, all in metallurgical engineering.

JORDAN RIVER & MIDVALE SLAG SUPERFUND SITE-BENEFICIAL USE

Erna Waterman1 and Marian Hubbard Rice2 (presenting author)
'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO  80202-1129
    Phone: 303-312-6762; Email: waterman.erna@epa.gov
2Salt Lake County Watershed Planning & Restoration Program, 2001 S. State Street, #N3100
    Salt Lake City, UT  84114; Phone: 385-468-6641; Email: mhubbard@,slco.org

Abstract:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) utilized a variety of  skill, knowledge, though
grants,  contracts and  graduate student contract work  to restore  and create an  ecosystem that
enhances adjacent business and residential areas.

About  five years  ago,  most of  the onsite  repository and  redevelopment of the Midvale  Slag
Superfund Site  was  underway. Today over 70  percent of the  former  mine smelting  site is
redeveloped for  commercial and residential purposes, including a light rail corridor. Also, about five
years ago EPA began studies, plans and design/build to improve the adjacent Jordan River corridor
using small contracts with  small and veteran-owned businesses,  direct hire of graduate students as
well as  grant funds for the local  county.  In addition, the USGS was hired  though an interagency
agreement to investigate the river energy  and flow to assess the best remedy for replacement of a
damaged and torn sheet pile dam, which crossed the river.

Plant and soil  studies conducted by graduate students as well as input from local experts on invasive
plant treatment  helped to make  the eventual three-year phased effort successful  in establishing
current ecological restoration. Currently,  specific endpoint goals are being established to lead to even
further  improvements with minimal additional funding. In  short,  this presentation will be a guide to
others who hope to do more with less (less water, less maintenance), to apply to other areas blighted
by mine/smelter operations in the past.
                                             66

-------
Bio:
Marian  Hubbard  joined  the  Salt Lake  County Engineering Division, Watershed  Planning  and
Restoration Program in 2007 as a Watershed Scientist and Planner. She has a bachelor of science
degree in  biology from Portland State University, a M.P.A in natural resource management from
University of Utah, and  is currently working on a  Ph.D. at University  of Utah.  Marian's core
responsibilities include, but are not limited to, collaboration with agencies, local stakeholders,  and
the general public; writing, updating  and implementing the Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality
Stewardship Plan (WaQSP); performing ecosystem restoration; and water quality monitoring in the
Jordan River Watershed. Prior to the County, Marian worked in the Portland, Oregon Metro area in
environmental management. After which  she moved to Utah to  work with the U.S.  Forest Service
performing ecosystem restoration in the beautiful Strawberry River Watershed.
    Session 14:  Prediction and Modeling
APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING A PROBABLE RANGE OF PIT LAKE
CONCENTRATIONS FOR MINE PITS WITH SULFIDE WALL ROCK

Sarah Doyle1, Cory Conrad1, Colleen Kelley2, Steve Lange1 (presenting author},
Rick Frechette1 and Houston Kenipton1
1 Knight Piesold and Co., 1999 Broadway, Suite 600, Denver, CO 80202-5706
    Phone: 303-629-8788; Emails: sdoyle@knightpiesold.com. cconrad@knightpiesold.com.
    slange@knightpiesold.com. rfrechette@knightpiesold.com. houston.kempton@gmail.com
2KnightPiesold and Co., 3275 W. Ina Road, Suite 109, Tucson, AZ  85741
    Phone: 520-807-1114; Email: ckelley@knightpiesold.com

Abstract:
Environmental impact statements and  pollution-control permits for modern hardrock mines require
quantitative estimates of future water quality that are consistent with established conceptual models,
transparent for reviewers, and bracket  reliably-predicted concentrations. We present here a model of
water-quality evolution in open-pit mine lakes designed to  address these permitting requirements.
The model includes solute loading from wall-rock runoff, oxidation products  released from sulfide
minerals  exposed  in pit  walls, groundwater, and catchment runoff. Sulfate is released directly by
oxidation of sulfide minerals in  wall rock subject to reaction rates, sulfide concentrations in  wall
rock, and properties of the blasted zone of the pit walls. Estimation of the  quantity of secondary
solutes released  during  sulfide  oxidation  (heavy metals and  other  acid-soluble constituents)  is
bounded using geochemical tests that simulate minimal  oxidation (synthetic precipitation leaching
procedure), moderate oxidation (humidity cells), and  complete oxidation  (peroxide-oxidation "net-
acid" generation extraction). Water quality calculations  use GoldSim software and Monte Carlo
simulations. Probabilistic variables, derived from testing of either  onsite material or analog studies,
include: 1) oxidation rate in reactive (i.e., <~25 mm) fragments, 2)  quantitation of the fraction of
reactive fragments in wall rock, 3) thickness of wall-rock blast zone, 4) secondary solutes released by
oxidation, and 5) quantitation  of the fraction  of wall rock in contact with runoff. Prediction of the
evolving  water composition is then refined by estimating precipitation of selected mineral phases
using the geochemical equilibrium model PHREEQC. By  presenting model inputs as ranges  and
thereby bracketing the estimated pit lake concentrations, this  method may produce more credible
output and thus streamline the regulatory review process associated with pit lake predictions.
                                           67

-------
Bio:
Steven Lange is the Director of the Geochemistry, Groundwater and  Surface  Water Group at
Knight Piesold USA. He brings over 35 years of experience related to investigation, evaluation, and
remediation of mining  and industrial sites throughout the  United States  and internationally with a
focus on projects in EPA Regions 6, 7,  8 and 9. His current experience is as a consultant for the
mining  industry  in the  fields  of geochemical and hydrological  studies, ARD  assessments,
geochemical  modeling,  geology,  hydrogeology and  groundwater modeling.  He has  conducted
baseline  geochemical  evaluations,  ARD  assessments, and geochemical modeling for feasibility,
operational, closure, and remedial investigation studies at mine sites in the USA,  Canada, Europe,
South America and the Philippines. He has conducted  baseline  studies,  MARSSIM compliant
surveys of sites with elevated radionuclides, geochemical modeling of uranium and  radium transport
in groundwater impacted by mining and processing operations, assisted in the design of closure and
reclamation plans, and conducted post closure verification surveys of air,  soil and water. Steven has
several publications on  site investigation  and modeling and has a B.S. in geology and an M.S. in
geochemistry from Kansas State University at Manhattan, Kansas.

ASSESSING POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM UNDERGROUND MINE DEWATERING
IN THE GALLUP, DAKOTA, AND WESTWATER CANYON AQUIFERS WITH A
BASIN-WIDE GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL

John M. Sigda, Ph.D.1 (presenting author), Cheng Cheng, Ph.D.2 and Cynthia Ardito, P.H.3
INTERA, Inc.
6000 Uptown Boulevard NE, Suite 220, Albuquerque, NM 87110; Phone: 505-246-1600
^mail: isigda@intera.com
 Email: ccheng@intera.com
3Email: cardito@intera.com

Abstract:
Energy  Fuels Resources Incorporated  (EFRI)  is proposing  to construct the new  Roca Honda
underground uranium mine at the eastern edge of the Grants uranium mineral district in the
southern San Juan Basin.  Developing the  Roca Honda  mine workings will require temporary
dewatering in three  regional aquifers: Gallup Sandstone, Dakota Sandstone, and Westwater Canyon
Member  of the Morrison  Formation during the course  of the  13-year mine plan. INTERA was
asked to assess potential impacts from dewatering to the basin's limited water resources as input to a
U.S.  Forest  Service Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  and  a  mine  dewatering permit
application to the New Mexico (NM) State Engineer.

In  collaboration with  the Roca  Honda  team and  EIS  hydrology  technical group,  INTERA
developed,   calibrated,   and  applied  a   regional  three-dimensional  MODFLOW   SURFACT
groundwater  flow model of the San Juan Basin to estimate mine dewatering rates and evaluate
potential effects of mine dewatering on wells, springs and perennial  rivers.  Founded on  the U.S.
Geological  Survey  (USGS) model  of steady-state groundwater flow in the San Juan Basin prior to
historical uranium mining (Kernodle, 1996), the Roca Honda groundwater flow model simulates the
current and historical groundwater conditions within  the Gallup, Dakota, and Westwater aquifers.
The  model covers an area of approximately 21,000 square miles, primarily  in New Mexico with
smaller  portions in Colorado,  Utah and Arizona. Built  using newly  available  data  on aquifer
structures,  properties,  and  stresses, the  Roca  Honda model is the first to be  calibrated to the
dewatering stresses from historical uranium mining in the Grants Uranium Mineral  Belt district. The
transient calibration, which spans the mining and post-mining periods  from 1930 to 2012, closely
                                            68

-------
matches  the  head declines observed from historical dewatering and the subsequent observed
rebound.

The Roca Honda model was successfully applied to evaluate potential impacts to wells, springs, and
rivers,  including Horace  Springs  and the Rio San  Jose. The model was accepted by the EIS
hydrology technical group  for use  in  the  draft EIS, which  was published in  early 2013. The
dewatering and impact assessment models helped EFRI secure the first mine dewatering permit
(December 2012) issued by the NM State Engineer since passage of the state's  Mine Dewatering Act
in 1978.

Bio:
Dr. Sigda serves as Senior Hydrogeologist at INTERA, Inc. in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He has
30 years of experience in quantitative hydrology in saturated and vadose zones, mine hydrology, flow
and transport  modeling, groundwater remediation, field  and  lab  measurement of hydraulic
properties, geologic controls on hydrologic processes, geostatistics, and water supply and sanitation
in developing countries. Dr. Sigda has provided technical expertise to the public and private sectors
with projects  located in California, Texas,  Nevada, New Mexico, Minnesota, Indiana, Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, New Jersey, Washington and Australia. He also  spent six  years promoting improved
water supplies, sanitation, and child survival and development in  Kenya and  Tanzania.  He  has
published in  Water Resources Research, Geophysical  Research Letters, American Geophysical
Union Monographs, and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.  Dr. Sigda has an engineering
A.B. from Harvard College and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in hydrology from New Mexico Institute of
Mining and Technology.

CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL IN THE
TRI-STATE MINING DISTRICT

Mehran Niazi, Ph.!).1 (corresponding author), Joseph Schubauer-Berigan, Ph.D.2 and
Mohamed Hantush, Ph.D.3
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development
National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division
26 W. Martin  Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH  45268
^hone: 513-569-7332; Email: niazi.mehran@epa.gov
2Phone: 513-569-7734; Email: schubauer-berigan.joseph@epa.gov
3Phone: 513-569-7089; Email: hantush.nohamed@epa.gov

Presented by Douglas Grosse, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 W. Martin  Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH  45268
Phone: 513-569-7844; Email: grosse.douglas@epa.gov

Abstract:
The Tri-State  Mining District  (TSMD)  of southwestern Missouri,   southeastern Kansas,  and
northeastern Oklahoma has been the center of mining activities to extract ores containing lead, zinc,
cadmium and other metals for decades. Transport of remaining  debris  from mining activities via
overland runoff led to the listing of Spring River as  an  impaired surface water. A Geospatial
Statistical Platform  (GSP) as  well as the Soil and  Water Assessment  Tool (SWAT) model was
developed and calibrated  as part of an integrated modeling system to investigate fate and transport
of  heavy metals in the overland flow  and stream network for  The Spring  River  Watershed
comprising approximately 6,000 km2. The primary goals of developing the GSP and SWAT model
were a) to identify hotspots for heavy metals where concentration of the metals exceeds the standard
                                            69

-------
levels, and b) to estimate annual average mass flux for sediment and heavy metals for the Spring
River and its tributaries in order to determine how many years will be required for natural recovery
to achieve reduced toxicant level in the sediments and water column necessary to minimize the risks
to human health and the environment.

To do this, several GIS layers from federal and state counterparts were utilized to develop the GSP
and two USGS gages, Spring River and Shoal Creek, were selected to calibrate the  SWAT model for
flow, total suspended  sediment (TSS) and heavy metals (lead,  cadmium  and  zinc) on yearly and
monthly basis from  2003 to 2010. While the results  shows a satisfying goodness  of fit (R  = 0.95
yearly and R2 = 0.73 monthly) for flow, the results for sediment is fair (R2  = 0.68 yearly and R2 =
0.35  monthly) and the calibration for heavy  metals is ongoing.  Karst formation of geology in the
watershed could be the primary reason for achieving the lower R2 values.

Bio:
Douglas  W. Grosse has a B.A.  in  English  literature  from  Ohio University  and an M.S.  in
environmental engineering from the University of Cincinnati. He has worked as an Environmental
Engineer at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Cincinnati, Ohio for the past 35
years. Mr. Grosse is currently working in EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory
(NRMRL) as a Senior Environmental Engineer. Past experiences have included: in-house research at
EPA's pilot plant facilities in wastewater and hazardous waste research; pilot  facility manager and
project officer  (Center  Hill Laboratory); Superfund  Innovative Technology Evaluation  (SITE)
Program; RCRA corrective  action coordinator and technical assistance in Superfund, RCRA and
treatability study assistance,  as an  aqueous treatment specialist, Acting Branch Chief, Technology
Transfer Branch, and ETV/AMS Center PO. Currently, Mr. Grosse  is working in the Remediation
and  Redevelopment Branch and Engineering Technical  Support  Center, as  a  specialist  in site
remediation and technical support.
              Session 15:  Closing Session
A SEMI-PASSIVE BIOREACTOR FOR TREATMENT OF A SULFATE AND METALS
CONTAMINATED WELL FIELD, NACIMIENTO MINE, NEW MEXICO

Timothy Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
TKT Consulting, LLC
2050 Driscoll Drive, Reno, NV 89509
Phone: 775-846-9659; Email: tkttim@,gmail.com

Abstract:
The  use of  semi-passive  sulfate-reducing bioreactors  to treat  metals contaminated water  has
advantages  over active treatment technologies. The operational  requirements are  reduced when
compared with conventional lime treatment, which typically requires daily monitoring. Semi-passive
systems require  more labor when compared to traditional passive bioreactors but can treat water
with higher concentrations  of  metals  and  can operate for longer periods  of time  without
replacement of the matrix due to plugging or depletion of carbon from the matrix. These systems
utilized  sulfate-reducing bacteria  that consume ethanol to reduce  sulfate to sulfide and precipitate
metals  as metal-sulfides. Because alcohols do  not freeze under normal site conditions, this carbon
and energy  source can be metered at specific concentrations to feed the bacteria continuously and
                                           70

-------
efficiently throughout the year. The majority of the metals are  settled and removed outside of the
bioreactor in a separate settling pond and a rock matrix with large pore spaces is utilized to reduce
the chance  of plugging and  short circuiting within the  bioreactor. The largest and newest semi-
passive  bioreactor is located at the Nacimiento Mine in  New Mexico.  This bioreactor treats
contaminated  ground water that is pumped from  9 wells to the bioreactor. The system has been
operating for  approximately  4 years with effective sulfate  removal and  treats iron and  copper at
concentrations as  high  as 270 and  120  mg/L respectively. Sulfate is reduced from an  average
influent concentration of  1,094 mg/L to an average discharge concentration of  556 mg/L with an
average removal of 538 mg/L.

Bio:
Tim has  a B.S. in biology and a Ph.D. in environmental chemistry from the University of Nevada,
Reno where he was  also a Research Professor. He is currently manager of TKT Consulting, and
Director of Technology at Ionic Water Technologies. He has worked in mining over 24 years and
has presented and published over  40 technical papers  and presentations. He  currently provides
consulting and design to private and public clients throughout North America and  develops AMD
treatment and  prevention technologies.
                                             71

-------
Poster Presentations

-------
                          Characterization
USING ICP SPECTROMETRY DATA AND ALKALINITY RESULTS FOR EFFECTIVE
SCREENING OF ACIDITY SAMPLES TO IMPROVE LABORATORY EFFICIENCY

Curtis Callahan
Chemist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
980 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605
Phone: 706-355-8806; Email: callahan.curtis(o),epa.gov

Abstract:
Standard Methods Acidity (SM 2310 B)  analysis is a labor intensive analysis requiring the addition of
H2SO4 until the pH  < 4.00, followed by adding H2O2, then boiling for 3-5 minutes, cooling and
finally adding NaOH to the endpoint (pH 8.5). However, using Standard Methods 2320 B Alkalinity
analysis coupled with an ICP spectrometry metals scan, the acidity results can be calculated prior to
full analysis to determine if the results have a potential to surpass the reporting limit, reducing the
number of samples analyzed for the acidity parameter. A full review of in-house data indicated that
samples screened according to the described procedure have comparable results, with  reduced total
analysis time. The developed screening procedure has been operationally applied at EPA Region IV
SESD laboratories since August 2011 and has reduced man-hours spent on acidity analysis  by over
50 percent while continuing to provide the reliable, high quality data necessary for Superfund project
management.

APPLYING EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICAL METHODS TO MINE WATERS

Jennifer Hare1 (presenting author) and Norman Carlson
Zonge International, Inc.
J3322 E. Fort Lowell Road, Tucson, AZ; Phone: 520-327-5501; Email: jenmfer.harefgteonge.com

Abstract:
Water and water problems are often  valid  targets  for  the same electrical  and electromagnetic
methods that are commonly used in minerals exploration, since water alters the electrical properties
of the subsurface. For example, dry subsurface material is more electrically resistive than saturated
material, and fresh or low TDS water is often more resistive than contaminated or high TDS water.
The geophysical methods  we  have  used to address water problems at mines include galvanic
resistivity and induced polarization (IP)  in various arrays,  time-domain electromagnetics (TDEM or
TEM),  and  controlled  source audio-frequency magnetotellurics  (CSAMT).  Given  different
environments and goals, each method has advantages and disadvantages.

Examples include the use of CSAMT  in monitoring an  in-situ copper leaching operation.  The
leachate is very low  resistivity, and zones of leachate  are  clearly distinguishable as anomalously low
resistivity relative to  the surrounding materials. Multiple surveys over an  8-year period were useful in
verifying fluid flow, as well as in locating fluids that accumulated in unexpected areas.

Similarly, fluids moving through leach pads have been successfully mapped. Flow barriers in pads,
which can affect the economics of  the operation, have been successfully detected, as well  as liner
leaks, which  can  be of significant environmental concern.  The CSAMT, TEM,  and  galvanic
                                           73

-------
resistivity methods have all been used on leach pads; the choice of method is usually based on the
size and  thickness of the pads, as well as the surface conditions. For relatively thick pads, in excess
of 200 feet, CSAMT provides better lateral  resolution at depth than other methods. On pads where
electrical contact with the surface is  difficult, however, TDEM has been useful, since it also provides
resistivity information but uses ungrounded loops of wire to transmit and receive signal.

The ability to acquire resistivity data with an ungrounded system (i.e., without pounding stakes into
the ground as electrodes) also allows the TDEM methodology to be used as a floating system on
evaporation ponds, for example, or mounted on a wheeled cart to rapidly map levees  or benches.
Depth of investigation with these mobile systems is more limited, but if the goal of the  survey is a
better understanding of the upper few tens  of feet, TDEM systems have become a very economic
mapping and monitoring tool given improvements in electronics and computing power in the last
decade.

Acidic mine fluids also  provide  a good electrical target. Acid mine  drainage moving through old,
abandoned mine workings has been used to successfully map the old  tunnels. In a version of the
minerals  exploration geophysical method known as mise-a-la-masse, in which an electrode is placed
in a low resistivity target (such as an ore body  or vein)  and a signal  is transmitted directly into the
target, the target can often be mapped in plan view by measuring the resulting electric fields on the
ground surface. By placing an electrode in the acidic fluids  flowing from an old collapsed mine,
surface measurements were  successful  in mapping  the  target tunnel at a depth  of 400 feet, and
drilling successfully intersected the mine tunnel.

The increasing usage of minerals exploration methods for water and environmental applications is
largely the  result  of  improvements in technology over the last 15 years, as field-portable, battery-
powered equipment has  become more sophisticated. For example, although IP has  been one of the
primary  methods  for porphyry copper exploration for  many decades,  it is  only recently that
electronics  and computing power have improved enough that IP can be acquired on a small scale
rapidly enough to be  economic for groundwater,  environmental and engineering applications.

EVALUATION OF DGT SAMPLERS FOR  MONITORING MINING-INFLUENCED
WATER

Curt Coover, P.G.1 (presenting author)  and Roger  Hoogerheide2
'COM Smith, 50 W. 14th Street, Suite 200, Helena, MT 59601
    Phone: 406-441-1400; Email: cooverca@cdmsmith.com
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 10 W. 15th Street, Suite 3200, Helena, MT  59601
    Phone: 406-457-5031; Email: hoogerheide.roger@epa.gov

Abstract:
Diffusive gradients in thin films  (DGT) samplers contain  gel that accumulates metals from surface
water which is  later analyzed to  determine average  metals concentrations over the period of
deployment. The DGT samplers are highly  portable, simple to deploy and designed to be placed in
surface water and left for days or weeks. Tests were conducted to evaluate if commercially available
samplers from DGT Research, Ltd. could be used  under routine  conditions by  sampling personnel
using the simplest calculations with default values  to supplement or replace standard sampling of
mining-influenced water at mine sites.

DGT samplers were  tested in a tributary stream heavily impacted by adit discharge and runoff from
waste rock  and containing significantly elevated  concentrations of dissolved metals. Samplers were
                                             74

-------
deployed in pairs to obtain 100 percent duplicate samples. Discrete water samples were collected at
the beginning and end  deployment of the DGT samplers to obtain  benchmark water  quality. A
second test was  conducted in the laboratory using bulk stream water from a  slightly impacted site
with low concentrations of dissolved metals. DGT samplers  were deployed in  four parallel tanks
under  controlled conditions  with conventional sampling  of the water conducted twice  during
deployment.

For the DGT samplers  placed in the stream, analysis of the  duplicate samples attained a relative
percent difference (RPD) for metals concentrations ranging from 25 to 60 percent. For the  DGT
samplers in the  tanks,  the natural and three  duplicate sample results for metals  had a relative
standard deviation (RSD) ranging from 7 to 36 percent. For precision measurements, RPD was used
for pairs,  but more than one duplicate allowed the use of the more robust RSD. All but  one
measurement of precision fell outside the normally  acceptable goal of  less  than 20  percent
RPD/RSD. Overall,  the  precision   of  the  DGT samplers  when  used to measure  metals
concentrations was not as good as conventional sampling.

Accuracy of the  samplers is more difficult to measure because the gel  in the sampler collects free
metal ions not bound by ligands in the stream to simulate only the metals that are bioavailable  rather
than all the metals measured by water sampling. The DGT sampler result should be no greater than
the dissolved concentration; however, results for metals concentrations by the DGT method were
approximately double the dissolved metals in discrete stream samples. For the laboratory evaluation,
metals  concentrations by the DGT method were approximately one order of magnitude higher than
the dissolved metals concentrations. The accuracy of the DGT samplers was not acceptable and was
biased high compared to the discrete water sampling results.

Overall, the DGT samplers did not have good precision and  accuracy in these tests compared to
conventional water sampling and did not perform well under these conditions at these locations.

ENVIRONMENTAL  SITE INVESTIGATIONS UNDER THE CHINO
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT

Matt Schultz
New Mexico Environment Department, Ground Water Quality Bureau
Mining and Environmental Compliance Section
3082 32nd  Street ByPass, Suite D, Silver City, NM 88061
Phone: 575-956-1550; Email: matthew.schultzfgistate.nm.us

Abstract:
An environmental investigation  is being  conducted under the  Chino Administrative Order  on
Consent (AOC)  to study the possible effects of historical mining and mineral processing activities
occurring  before current environmental regulations in  the  area  surrounding  Chino's  operation
covering approximately  50  square miles. The Chino AOC was formed  in  1994 to protect public
health and  the environment, and is a voluntary agreement between Chino Mines Company and the
New Mexico Environment Department. The chemicals of potential concern  are primarily  metals.
The Chino AOC is  divided  into  the following investigation  units (IU)  each  with their  own
contaminant sources, transport mechanisms, affected media and exposure pathways: Hurley Soils,
Hanover and Whitewater Creeks, Smelter and Tailing Soils,  and Lampbright Draw. Following a
"CERCLA" type process, the environmental site investigation for each  unit typically involves the
summary of existing data, identification of additional data  needs, remedial investigation of the nature
and extent  of contamination, probabilistic risk assessment of human and environmental health due
                                            75

-------
to potential exposure pathways  and the length and  amount  of exposure,  feasibility study of
remediation alternatives,  record of decision, remediation if necessary, completion report, and site
maintenance and effectiveness monitoring. An update on each investigation unit will be provided.
                          Water Treatment
COLUMN STUDY TREATABILITYTESTING FOR IN SITU REMEDIATION OF
MINING-INFLUENCED WATER

Nicholas R. Anton, P.E.1 (presenting author), Nathan T. Smith2, Roger L. Olsen, Ph.D.3,
David J. Reisman4, Angela K. Frandsen, P.E.5 and Mike Sieczkowski, CHMM6
Environmental Engineer, COM Smith, 555 17th Street, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80202
   Phone: 720-264-1147; Email: antonnr@,cdmsmith.com
Environmental Scientist, COM Smith, 555 17th Street, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80202
   Phone: 720-264-1124; Email: smithnt@cdmsmith.com
3Sr. Environmental Scientist, CDM Smith, 8805 Governor's Hill Drive, Suite 305
   Cincinnati, OH 45249; Phone: 513-319-0489; Email: reismandj@cdmsmith.com
Environmental Engineer, CDM Smith, 50 W. 14th Street, Suite 200, Helena, MT  59601
   Phone: 406-441-1435; Email: frandsenak@cdmsmith.com
5Sr. Vice President, CDM Smith, 555 17th Street, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80202
   Phone: 303-383-2422; Email: olsenrl@cdmsmith.com
^Technical Sales Director, JRW Bioremediation, 14321 W. 96th Terrace
   Lenexa, KS 66215; Phone: 913-438-5544; Email: msiec2kowski@jrwbiorem.com

Abstract:
As part  of an internal research and development program, CDM Smith  conducted bench-scale
proof-of-principle tests in 2012 for three different mining-influenced waters (MIWs) using a variety
of liquid and/or slurried solid substrates. In 2013, CDM Smith continued the treatability testing with
laboratory column studies. The goal of the research is to implement in situ treatment of MIW within
abandoned mine workings and groundwater systems. The use of ex situ passive  treatment methods
for remediation of MIW continues to grow; however, while these methods are sometimes more
cost-effective than active treatment, they may have limited  applicability due to  space  requirements,
flow rates, and seasonality of MIW discharge. In situ MIW treatment has the potential to significantly
decrease the amount of space required, treats the contaminant source, and alleviates the issue of
fluctuating flow that can cause issues in ex situ systems.

In 2013, CDM Smith completed the second year  of internal research to determine whether in situ
remediation is a  viable option for treating MIW. CDM Smith completed column studies using a
strongly-acidic, high-metal content MIW. Phase 1 evaluated  injection of treatment substrates into
columns packed with  acidic waste  rock  and  pea  gravel.  Substrates included a  guar gum  /
ChitoRem® suspension, and  a  mixture  of propylene glycol,  sodium hydroxide, and  inoculum.
Several injections were conducted, with continuous pumping of MIW through the  columns. Samples
were collected and evaluated. Phase 2 consisted of two columns, each  loaded with inert gravel, and
saturated with MIW.  The first column contained ChitoRem® for MIW treatment, and the second
column  acidic waste rock  to mimic the natural mine environment.  The columns were recycled
continuously, and MIW was periodically pumped into the columns for sample  collection and to
maintain saturated conditions. Periodically, flushing events were simulated by transferring a portion
                                           76

-------
of the water from the ChitoRem® column into the waste rock column. Samples were collected and
evaluated. Initial testing indicates substantial buffering and metal removal was  achieved within the
ChitoRem® columns, and apparent passivation of the acidic waste rock.

BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS FOR TREATING MINING INFLUENCED WATER

Douglas Bacon1 and David Gates2
'State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N. 1950 W., P.O. Box 4840
    Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840; Phone: 801-536-4282; Email: dbacon@,utah.gov
2State of Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, 707 N. Robinson, P.O. Box 1677
    Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677;Phone: 405-702-5124; Email: david.cates@,deq.state.ok.us

Abstract:
Innovative approaches and technologies need to  be  developed  and  implemented  that  solve
environmental issues  and  remove existing regulatory barriers. The  Interstate  Technology and
Regulatory Council (ITRC)  is a state-led, national coalition helping regulatory agencies, site owners,
and technology developers and vendors achieve better environmental protection through the use of
innovative technologies. Through  open communication among its partners, ITRC is streamlining
and  standardizing  the regulatory  review process  for  better, more cost-effective, environmental
technologies.   Funding  comes  from  the  Departments  of Defense  and  Energy,   the  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency as well as industry and is used to  support teams to address state
environmental priorities. The ITRC mine waste team was  formed in 2008 to address mine impacted
solids and water and produced a web-based guidance to help select technologies that address a wide
variety of mine waste issues (ITRC MW-1, 2010 at http://www.itrcweb.org/miningwaste-guidance).
During  the development of the first guidance, the  team felt that  although biochemical reactors
(BCRs)  were a promising  technology,  more  information on their design,  use  and  success was
needed. As a result, in 2013, the team completed a guidance on their use. (http://itrcweb.org/bcr-
l/). The guidance contains information on the applicability, design, construction, monitoring and
maintenance of BCRs as well as  discussions on the related regulatory and public stakeholder issues.
Fifteen case studies are included.

SUBSURFACE BARRIERS AND INNOVATIVE GEOCHEMISTRY: REDUCING
CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUND WATER AND CONTAMINANT
DISCHARGES TO FOURMILE BRANCH AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, SOUTH
CAROLINA

Carol A. Eddy-Dilek1 (presenting author}. Miles E. Denham and Brian B. Looney
Savannah River National Laboratory
'Bldg. 773-42A, Aiken, SC 29803; Phone: 803-761-1826; Email: carol.eddy-dilek@,srnl.doe.gov

Abstract:
The Savannah  River  Site  (SRS) produced  tritium, plutonium, and special nuclear materials for
national defense, medicine, and the space programs. The F and H Area  Seepage Basins at SRS were
used until 1988 for the disposition of deionized acidic waste water from the F  and H Separations
Facilities. The waste water contained dilute  nitric acid and low  concentrations of non-radioactive
metals, and radionuclides, with the major isotopes being Cs-137, Sr-90, U-235, U-238, Pu-239, Tc-
99, 1-129 and tritium. The acid content of the waste water  during the operational period of the
basins was equal to  12 billion liters  of nitric acid. The  seepage basins were  closed in  1988 and
backfilled and capped by 1991.
                                            77

-------
The groundwater plumes  associated with the F and H basins cover an  area of nearly  2.4 square
kilometers (600 acres) and discharge along -2,600 meters of Fourmile Branch have been addressed
in a phased approach. In  1997, two  large pump and treat systems were  operated until 2003 in an
attempt to capture and control the releases to Fourmile Branch. The operating cost, including waste
disposal, for the two systems was ~$1.3  million/month.  Both  systems employed reinjection of
tritiated water up gradient  of the extraction, and produced large quantities  of waste from non-tritium
isotopes and metals removal prior to reinjection. After  it became apparent that there was very little
benefit to continued operation of the  systems, a new remedy was  developed. This new system uses
vertical  subsurface barriers to redirect groundwater flow to limit the transport of contaminants to
the stream.  The barriers, constructed  of acid-resistant grout, were installed using deep soil mixing
techniques. The  grout mixture used low swelling clay, fly ash, and sodium hydroxide to form a low
permeability barrier.

At  the F Area Basins, the subsurface barriers extend to 18  meters below the surface, and form a
funnel and gate system 1,036 meters long. The system contains  three gates that have openings set in
the upper portion of the  water table, which promotes  water movement mostly in the  top of the
stratigraphic section. The gates contain a base injection treatment system to neutralize nitric  acid and
cause the precipitation of metals onto  aquifer materials. Construction of the subsurface barriers was
completed in 2005. Periodic injection of base in the gates and down gradient  of the barriers has
allowed SRS to  meet groundwater  protection  requirements  for  radioactive metals  in Fourmile
Branch.

The F-area site is the pilot field testing site for a DOE-EM sponsored research initiative focused on
field testing and implementation  of innovative, long-lived  attenuation-based remedies. For these
remedies  to gain  regulatory  approval, they  must demonstrably reduce  contaminant  flux  to
compliance points for long periods of time. Initial field  studies have been done in conjunction with
the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory that show sorbed humates strongly bind uranium at mildly acidic
pH which would be applicable for contaminant stabilization at a wide variety of sites; current studies
are focused on  optimization of this  approach.  In addition,  a  passive reactive  treatment for 1-129
using silver chloride is being tested. These pilot field-scale tests  should provide the technical basis to
move from basic science to actual field deployment and eventual regulatory acceptance. In addition,
researchers are  investigating the viability of an innovative approach  to  long term monitoring of
residual contamination that should improve performance while significantly lowering  costs. The F-
Area experience  demonstrates the value  of using innovative in  situ geochemical treatments to
address  inorganic and radionuclide contaminants that are present in persistent groundwater plumes
typical of mining, milling and processing sites.

STEWARDSHIP CONCEPTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF HARD ROCK MINING
WASTEWATERS

John McKernan, Sc.D., CIH
Director, Engineering Technical Support Center (ETSC)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk
    Management Research Laboratory
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, MS 489A, Cincinnati, OH  45268
Phone: 513-569-7415; Email: mckernan.j ohn(g),epa.gov

Abstract:
Hard-rock mines generate waste material including overburden,  waste rock, tailings, and hazardous
constituents that can be mobilized or solubilized through contact with water. Typically, approaches
                                             78

-------
for managing wastewaters, drainage, and runoff from mining sites are  designed to meet regulatory
requirements while minimizing capital and operating costs. Environmental stewardship concepts can
provide long-term solutions  for managing mining wastes  while  incorporating current  and future
regulatory and  economic  drivers. Material recovery and water reuse from industrial  use  practices
could potentially be adapted  for mining sites. Minimizing environmental impacts of U.S. hard-rock
mining involves an integrated approach including:

    •   Industry-specific controls for solid and liquid wastes
    •   Reliable treatment for managing liquid waste streams, recovering resources and water, and
       controlling runoff
    •   Long-term stewardship.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OF HIGH TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AND
ACIDITY AT THE CERRO DE PASCO MINE SITE

Tom Rutkowski1, Melissa Rhodes1* (presenting author), Jessa Smith1, Kevin Conroy1,
Mike Bratty2 and Miguel Cortes3
Bolder Associates, USA
2Golder Associates, Canada
3Golder Associates, Peru
*44 Union Boulevard, Suite 300, Lakewood, CO  80228
    Phone: 720-962-3439; Email: mrhodes(g),golder.com

Abstract:
Vulcan  SAC has retained  Colder Associates to expand  the capacity of the existing mine drainage
water treatment plant (WTP) at the Cerro de Pasco mine site. The extremely elevated acidity and
metals concentrations are unusual for  a typical mine wastewater. This high  strength water results in
significant operating costs due to the  quantities of lime required for neutralization and the cost of
lime.  Colder performed bench testing  of several treatment approaches in  order  to  reduce  lime
consumption rates  for the  expanded WTP.  A  treatment approach  using limestone  as  a  pre-
neutralizing agent was found to be surprisingly effective.

Typically, lime is used as a neutralizing agent in mine water treatment instead of limestone,  because
it cannot reach the pH to precipitate out most metals. Lime is required to reach higher pH values. It
also is generally less effective in waters with high metals  concentrations  due to armoring,  leading to
low utilization  and long reaction times. However due  to  the  high cost  of lime, limestone  may
represent a  significant cost  savings. Limestone was   chosen for testing, despite its  proven
disadvantages. High density sludge (HDS) was chosen as a  typical treatment process, while copper
sulfide recovery was chosen due to the water's high copper concentration.

Bench results indicate that treatment to the  LMP  standards  occurs  at  pH 8.0 for HDS  and
limestone/lime neutralization. Limestone resulted  in the highest sulfate removal, as well as metals
removal comparable to the HDS process. Limestone prevented gypsum armoring, thereby reducing
the required reaction  time by up to 66 percent and decreasing the amount of lime  required for
neutralization. Copper sulfide recovery  had difficulty separating arsenic to produce  a marketable
copper sulfide concentrate, and high sludge generation rates will inhibit implementation.

Cerro de Pasco is notable for its elevated acidity and TDS. Conventional lime treatment processes
(LDS, HDS) are effective but require high chemical costs. Alternate methods using limestone or
                                             79

-------
copper sulfide precipitation may decrease operating  costs. Limestone as a pre-neutralization step
offers benefits for high sulfate, low pH waters, including a reduction in reagent cost and armoring,
resulting in better reaction rates.  Copper recovery was believed to have potential application at the
site, in that copper may be  sold to offset costs. However, difficulty in separating out the marketable
copper as well as high sludge generation rates inhibits use  of the technology. The sulfide and
limestone processes are projected to  reduce annual chemical costs by 15 percent and 20 percent,
respectively.
    Source  Control / Mine Closure Approaches
USE OF BIOCHARS PRODUCED BY GASIFICATION OF GRASS AND WOOD IN
THE REMEDIATION OF TWO ACID MINE SOILS OF WESTERN OREGON

Stephen M. Griffith1 and Gary Banowetz
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed & Cereal Research Unit
'3450 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97330-7102
    Phone: 541-738-4125; Email: steve.griffith(a),ars.usda.gov

Abstract:
Unfavorable acid soil conditions exist in both natural and agricultural landscapes and can have
deleterious effects on the health of plants, wildlife, humans, and ecosystems by affecting biological
and chemical processes. Under extreme acidic conditions (i.e.,  pH  <3), establishment of vegetation
can be very difficult; the lack of vegetation leaves bare ground that is highly susceptible to erosion,
which in turn leads  to contamination and sedimentation of surface waters. Biochars  produced by
gasification of  Kentucky bluegrass  seed cleanings  or mixed  wood debris were used  as  soil
amendments at rates of 0, 10, 20, 40, 90  and  150 g kg"1 in two acid mine soils (pH < 3.5) collected
from western Oregon. Wheat was planted in each soil combination and maintained in a greenhouse
for 58 days when plant tissues were  collected and  quantified.  Amendment of the  acidic soils with
each level of biochar raised the soil  pH, but greater than 20 g kg4 was required to observe significant
increase in wheat biomass production.  Wheat growth  did not occur in non-amended soils while
significant increases in growth  occurred in soils amended at higher  levels of biochar. It is likely that
increases in soil pH  associated with the biochar amendment were to a  large degree responsible for
the improved wheat growth although it is possible that sorption of metals from the contaminated
soil also improved growth conditions.
                                          80

-------
INVESTIGATING BIOCHAR AS A TOOL FOR MINE SOIL REMEDIATION

Mark G. Johnson1 (presenting author), Jonathan J. Maynard2 and Peter S. Nico3
Research Soil Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and
    Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 S.W. 35th Street,
    Corvallis, OR 97333, Phone: 541-754-4696; Email: johnson.markg@epa.gov
2Research Ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture ARS Jornada Experimental Range
    P.O. Box 30003, MSC 3JER, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003
    Phone: 575-646-2660; Email: jmaynard@,nmsu.edu
3Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, One Cyclotron Road, 90R1116
    Berkeley, CA 94720; Phone: 510-486-7118; Email: pnicol23@,gmail.com

Abstract:
Biochar is a cost-effective, carbon negative soil amendment that can lead to improved soil quality.
Research has also demonstrated  the  efficacy of biochar  to  sorb  heavy metals and agricultural
chemicals from contaminated soils, thus effectively reducing the  potential for  metal and chemical
contamination of surface and  ground waters. In this study we investigated the ability of biochar
produced from a single feedstock (Douglas fir wood chips)  across a  range of charring temperatures
(300-700°C)  to  bind with metals. Our goal  in this research  is to link  metal  sorption to specific
biochar properties, and then use  these relationships to engineer biochar with specific properties to
achieve various remediation and soil quality outcomes. We characterized our biochars using a variety
of techniques including total elemental analysis, pH, FTIR spectroscopy, surface area and pore size
analysis, and proximal carbon  analysis. We used batch experiments  of biochar with either Cu  (II)
solutions or  simulated rainwater extracts of soils contaminated with mine tailings to investigate metal
sorption. Sorbed metals were  characterized using synchrotron-based  XAS, XANES,  EXAFS and
XRF-Tomography. We  found that higher temperature biochars, while having a decreased abundance
of oxygen containing functional groups, had  an  increased capacity for metal sorption over biochar
produced at lower  temperatures.  Concomitantly, these biochars also have greater ash  contents,
surface areas, abundance of small pores  and higher pH values. Results  of our sorption  studies
indicate that metal sorption on  biochar may be competitive and preferential, and that as the charring
temperature  goes up, physisorption may become more important as a mechanism of metal sorption
to biochar.

MECHANISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF BIOGEOCHEMICAL TRANSFORMATIONS
OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN CONTAMINATED MINE WASTE MATERIALS UNDER
REDUCED CONDITIONS

Ranju R. Kama (presenting author] and Ganga M.  Hettiarachchi, Ph.D.
Soil and Environmental Chemistry, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas 66506
Phone: 785-532-7281; Email: rkarna@.ksu.edu

Abstract:
The milling  and mining operations of metal ores  are one of the  major sources  of  heavy metal
contamination at earth's surface. Due to historic mining activities conducted in the Tri-State mining
district, large area of land covered with mine waste, and soils enriched with lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and
cadmium (Cd) still  remain void  of any vegetation influencing plant productivity, ecosystem and
human health. It has been hypothesized that if  these mine waste materials are disposed  of in  the
flooded subsidence  pits; metals can be transformed back  into their sulfide forms under reduced
conditions limiting their mobility and toxicity. However, these mine waste materials are high in pH,
                                            81

-------
low in organic carbon (OC) and sulfur (S) limiting the effectives of this remediation approach. The
objective of this study was to examine  the  effect of OC and S addition  on the biogeochemical
transformations  of Pb, Zn and  Cd  in  submerged mine waste materials containing microcosms.
Advanced molecular  spectroscopic and  microbiological techniques  were used  to  obtain  a detail,
mechanistic, and  molecular  scale understanding  of the effect of natural  and stimulated redox
conditions  on biogeochemical transformation and dynamics  of Pb and  Zn  essential for designing
effective remediation and mitigation strategies.

The  results  obtained  from these  column studies  indicated that Pb, Zn and  Cd  were effectively
immobilized upon medium (119-day) and long-term (252-day) submergence regardless of treatment.
Synchrotron based bulk-, and micro-X-ray fluorescence and X-ray absorption spectroscopy analyses
indicated enhancement of sulfide  formation  with  OC  plus S  treatment. The  microarray analysis
revealed change in microbial community structure on  OC and S addition  with the  evidences of
enhanced sulfur reducing bacteria genes (dsrA/B),  and decreased metal resistance genes over time.
Through the combined kinetic and thermodynamic evaluation of effluent water chemistry, molecular
scale  spectromicroscopy  and microbiological analyses, we  have  evidences  that the long-term
submergence of existing mine tailings with OC plus S addition reduced the trace metals mobility
through dissimilatory sulfate reduction under stimulated reduced conditions.

This research enhances our understanding of the redox processes associated with the sequestration
of non-redox sensitive metals through dissimilatory reduction of sulfates in mine waste materials
and/or waste  water   and provides  regulators with  useful  scientific  evidence   for  optimizing
remediation goals.

BIOCHAR FOR REMEDIATION OF SOLID SOURCE MINE WASTES AND MINE
DRAINAGE TREATMENT

Christopher Peltz1 (presenting author) and Andrew Harley2
Research Services, P.O. Box 873, Silverton, CO 81433; Email: chris(g),researchservicesco.com
^etra Tech, Inc., 350 Indiana Street, Suite 500, Golden, CO 80401

Abstract:
Soil amendments are often required for re-vegetating and stabilizing solid mine wastes such as waste
rock,  tailings and  heap leach pads, in  order to reduce the  migration of  metals to air, surface and
ground water; reduce  soil  toxicity; and meet liability requirements. The  presence  at many  sites of
metal  rich waste rock and  mill  tailings pose  major  impediments  to  successful  reclamation.
Stabilization and  isolation strategies  can be improved  and  reinforced  when   re-vegetation  is
incorporated into  reclamation designs, and achieves success.  Additionally, acid rock drainage and
metal leachate  originating  from mine sites requires treatment,  sometimes into perpetuity  at high
costs.

The carbon rich product of a pyrolysis reaction, biochar has  been utilized as a  soil amendment for
mining affected soils at sites in the United States, Spain,  and the United Kingdom achieving varying
degrees of success in facilitating vegetation growth and soil pedogenesis. Though previous work has
demonstrated that biochar can be an effective tool  for mine reclamation,  questions remain regarding
material type and application  rates under varying soil conditions. Furthermore, as interest in passive
treatment of mining affected waters has increased, matrix materials that can provide adsorptive and
chemically reactive beneficial effects have been sought.
                                             82

-------
Presented here are the results from a range of studies  and implementation projects, with examples
from  Colorado, Nevada and Utah. These projects and studies focused on biochar  application as  a
soil amendment for mining affected spoil piles and tailings, and as a component of passive treatment
for acid mine drainage.
                              Beneficial  Use
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF RARE EARTH ELEMENTS:
SELECTION OF A PRODUCT SYSTEM FOR A LCA CASE STUDY

Diana Bless1 (presenting author), David Meyer and Michael Gonzalez
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk
    Management Research Laboratory
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268
1 Email: bless.diana@,epa.gov

Abstract:
The two major markets for Rare Earth Elements (REEs) that have received significant attention in
the area of sustainable materials research are the consumer electronics and information technologies
and energy-related technologies. The interest in consumer electronics and information technologies
is largely based  on concerns for  both  supply issues and environmental impacts during end-of-life
(EOL) activities. Both of these issues can be  addressed using sustainable materials management
(SMM) practices.  The U.S.  EPA's Chemical  Safety for Sustainability research program is applying
SMM tools  such  as  material flow analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and sustainable process
design to selected REE product systems to better understand how these tools  can be improved to
meet the needs of decision makers seeking to improve the sustainability of these products. A cross-
Agency work group  was assembled and  identified relevant issues or questions related to  energy
critical elements/rare earth elements that should be  included when considering  sustainable materials
management. A literature review was used to identify data gaps related to  these issues  as they pertain
to mining, use and potential recovery of REEs for a range of products, including magnets, batteries,
and phosphors used  in consumer electronics. Recent advances in mining technologies  need to  be
evaluated to better understand their impacts and cost implications (if any) on the consumer product
markets.  A  major concern  for  most of the recovery processes is the  need  to isolate the REE-
containing portions of the products (i.e.,  separate  the HDDs from computers). This can be time-
consuming and  has proven to be challenging when REEs occur in  low concentrations in e-waste.
Furthermore, most  recycling  technologies  are  still in  their  development  stage  with limited
commercial  scale deployment. The results from the literature review will be used to  perform a life
cycle assessment of a key consumer electronic product to determine how potential SMM  strategies
such as sustainable mining, recycling, reuse, and substitution  alter the life cycle impacts. The impact
data will inform  the  use  of EPA's GREENSCOPE sustainable process evaluation and  design
methodology to identify improvements for proposed technologies within the life cycle.
                                            83

-------
THERMAL AND HYDRO LOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AN ABANDONED
MINE COMPLEX FOR LOW-ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL EXTRACTION: THE
CORNING MINE COMPLEX, PERRY COUNTY, OHIO

Joshua J. Richardson1 (presenting author) and Dina L. Lopez
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University
316 Clippinger Laboratories, Athens, OH 45701
'Phone: 740-707-7939; Email:)r282105@ohio.edu

Abstract:
Ground  Source Heat Pump (GSHP)  or Geothermal Heat Pump  systems exchange heat with the
either saturated or unsaturated shallow bedrock or soils at an increased efficiency for heating and
cooling applications compared to traditional heat pump heating and cooling systems. Waters within
flooded abandoned underground mines could provide a valuable heat reservoir for both extraction
and injection using GSHP technologies. The  Corning Mine  Complex  in Perry County, Ohio was
evaluated to characterize the modes of heat transfer in the  mine with respect to atmospheric and
hydrologic  controls.  Temperature and hydraulic  head sensors  were placed into monitoring  wells
drilled into the mine void. Time series analysis was  performed on temperature and hydraulic head
data using  precipitation and  ambient air  temperature  data from  a  nearby weather  station to
determine the thermal response of the mine to atmospheric  heat and mine recharge events. Using
water levels within the monitoring wells, the volume of water within the  mine void and the residence
times of  water within the mine complex was calculated. Based upon the estimated volume of waters
within the mine void calculation, the amount of heat available for exchange within those waters was
quantified.

The results of this study show a thermally stable reservoir of water within the mine void which water
temperature varies locally with overburden thickness. The temperatures within the mine void did not
vary with precipitation  events or other short-term recharge events, except  for wells  with  clear
damage that connect the reservoir with the  surface. The amount of heat extractable from the mine
void was calculated to be  3.12 x 1010  kJ/°C. Overall, these  results show that temperature is stable
within the mine system and is  controlled  by  the separation between the thermal reservoir of the
mine  and the  thermal reservoir of the atmosphere. These  results could be  valuable  for further
understanding  heat transfer within mines and  for the implementation of GSHPs  in flooded
abandoned mines in Ohio.
                                            84

-------
                  Prediction  and Modeling
PREDICTING WATER QUALITY FOR A HIGH ALTITUDE MINE WASTE FACILITY
IN PERU

C.J. Warren1, D.S. Kaback2 (presenting author}, G. Inci3 and D. Neff4
Associate Geochemist, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, 160 Traders Boulevard, East,
   Suite 110, Mississauga Ontario Canada L4Z 3K7
   Phone: 905-568-2929 ext. 4356; Email: jim.warren@,amec.com
 Principal Geochemist, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Denver, CO
   Phone: 303-742-5338, Email: dawn.kaback@amec.com
3Senior Geotechnical Engineer, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Denver, CO
   Phone: 303-742-5336; Email: gokhan.inci@,amec.com
Structural Engineer, M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation, Tucson, AZ
   Phone: 502-293-1488; Email: dhneff@.m3eng.com

Abstract:
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure (AMEC) was  retained by M3 Engineering and Technology
Corporation (M3) to provide an assessment of the acid  rock drainage and metals leaching potential
(ARD/ML) of waste rock and ore to  be  produced at an  open pit copper mine  located at high
elevation (3,000 — 4,500 masl) in Peru. The mine is  expected to produce about 573 Mt of ore for
milling, 173 Mt of low-grade ore for heap leach, and about 1,360 Mt of waste rock over 25 years of
operation. The current plan is to construct an onsite waste storage facility (WSF) by co-blending
milled tailings with waste rock in an alpine  valley. The WSF, which will also partially cover the heap
leach residue pad located at the top of the  valley, will contain underdrains directed to a single pond
at the  toe.  Geochemical testing included  analyses  of  1,000 samples from five major lithologies
representing waste  rock  and ore for acid  base  accounting and content of total metals. Selected
samples of waste rock, simulated tailings, and heap  leach residue were  submitted for mineralogical,
humidity cell, and other geochemical testing.  Geochemical results were modeled by considering the
configuration of the WSF to predict water quality of the leachate at the toe. Leachate pH is expected
to be mildly alkaline  due to alkalinity generated primarily by the tailings. Although the heap leach
residue  is expected  to contribute some  acidity,  alkalinity  from  the  tailings  will minimize the
contribution. The results indicate that  arsenic, chromium, mercury, and zinc may be of possible
concern, requiring treatment prior to discharge.
                                           85

-------
   List of Speakers
and Poster Presenters

-------
                 National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                        August 12-14,2014 * Albuquerque, NM

                        List of Speakers and Poster Presenters
Nick Anton, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
CDM Smith
555 17th St., Suite 1100
Denver, CO  80202
Phone: 720-264-1147
antonnr@cdmsmith.com

Cynthia Ardito
Senior Hydrogeologist
INTERA Incorporated
6000 Uptown Blvd. NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Phone: 505-246-1600
cardito@intera.com

Douglas Bacon, C.P.M.
Environmental Scientist/Project Manager
Utah Department of Environmental Quality /
  Division of Environmental Response and
  Remediation
195 North 1950 West, P.O. Box 144840
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840
Phone: 801-536-4282
dbacon@utah.gov

Monisha Banerjee
Project Scientist
GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.
3393 N. Dodge Blvd.
Tucson, AZ  85716
Phone: 520-628-9330
monisha@gsanalysis .com

Jim Bays
Technology Fellow
CH2MHILL
4350 W. Cypress St.
Tampa, FL 33704
Phone: 813-281-7705
jbays@ch2m.com

Diana  Bless
Chemical Engineer
U.S. EPA
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Phone: 513-569-7674
bless.diana@epa.gov
Mary Boardman
Project Manager
Colorado Department of Public Health and
  Environment
4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S, HMWMD-RP-B2
Denver, CO  80246
Phone: 303-692-3413
mary.boardman@state.co.us

Andy Boeckeler
Vice President
Nobis Engineering, Inc.
ISChenellDr.
Concord, NH 03301
Phone: 603-724-6224
aboeckeler@nobiseng.com

Curtis Callahan
Chemist
U.S. EPA Region 4
980 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA  30605
Phone: 706-355-8806
callahan.curtis@epa.gov

Kate Campbell, Ph.D.
Research Chemist
U.S. Geological Survey
3215 Marine St., Suite E127
Boulder, CO  80303
Phone: 303-541-3035
kcampbell@usgs.gov

David Gates, P.E.
Professional Engineer
Oklahoma  Department of Environmental Quality
707 N. Robinson
Oklahoma  City, OK 73101-1677
Phone: 405-702-5124
david.cates@deq.ok.gov

Terrence Chatwin
Technical Director
INAP
2105 Oneida  St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84109
Phone: 801-485-2279
tchatwin@inap.com.au
                                             87

-------
                 National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                        August 12-14, 2014 * Albuquerque, NM
                        List of Speakers and Poster Presenters
Curt Coover, P.G.
Geologist
CDM Smith
50 W. 14th St., Suite 200
Helena, MT 59601
Phone: 406-441-1427
cooverca@cdmsmith.com

Kent Cordry
President
Geolnsight
2007 Glass Rd.
Las Cruces, NM 88005
Phone: 800-996-2225
kentcordry@aol.com

Ron Curry
Regional Administrator - Region 6
U.S. EPA
1445 ROSS Ave.
Dallas, TX 75202
Phone: 214-665-2100
curry.ron@epa.gov

W. Lee Daniels, Ph.D.
Professor
Virginia Tech
CSES, 0404, Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24061
Phone: 540-231-7175
wdaniels@vt.edu

Stephen Dent, Ph.D.
Staff Engineer/Scientist
CDM Smith
6132 SE Lambert St.
Portland, OR 97206
Phone: 503-205-7419
dentsr@cdmsmith.com

Steve Dwyer, Ph.D., P.E.
Principal Engineer
Dwyer Engineering LLC
1813 Stagecoach Rd., SE
Albuquerque, NM 87123
Phone: 505-844-0595
dwyerengineering@yahoo.com
Carol Eddy-Dilek
Senior Technical Advisor
Savannah River National Laboratory
Bldg. 773-42A
Aiken,SC 29803
Phone: 803-761-1826
carol.eddy-dilek@srnl.doe.gov

Angela Frandsen, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
CDM Smith
50 W. 14th St., Suite 200
Helena, MT 59601
Phone: 406-441-1435
frandsenak@cdmsmith.com

Jeffrey Frithsen, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist
U.S. EPA/ORD/NCEA
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, MC: 8623P
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-347-8623
frithsen.jeff@epa.gov

Douglas W. Grosse
Senior Environmental Engineer
U.S. EPA/ORD/NRMRL
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Phone: 513-569-7844
grosse.douglas@epa.gov

Jim Gusek, P.E.
Senior Engineer
Sovereign Consulting Inc.
12687 W. Cedar Dr.
Lakewood, CO 80228
Phone: 720-524-4908
jgusek@sovcon.com

Jennifer Hare, Ph.D.
Senior Geophysicist
Zonge International
3322 E. Fort Lowell Rd.
Tucson, AZ 85716
Phone: 520-327-5501
jennifer.hare@2onge.com

-------
                 National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                        August 12-14, 2014 * Albuquerque, NM
                        List of Speakers and Poster Presenters
Gary Hazen, P.E., R.G.
Environmental Engineer
CDM Smith
9200 Ward Pkwy., Suite 500
Kansas City, MO  64114
Phone: 816-412-3147
hazengl@cdmsmith.com

Marian Hubbard
Watershed Scientist & Planner
Salt Lake County Watershed Planning &
  Restoration
2001 S. State  St., Suite N3100,P.O. Box 144575
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4575
Phone: 385-468-6641
mhubbard@slco.org

Christopher Hunt, Ph.D., G.E.
Principal
Geosyntec Consultants
1111 Broadway - 6th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
Phone: 510-285-2748
chunt@geosyntec.com

Mark G. Johnson, Ph.D.
Research Soil Scientist
U.S. EPA
200 SW 35th St.
Corvallis, OR 97333
Phone: 541-754-4696
j ohnson .markg@epa.gov

Perry Jones, P.G.
Hydrologist
U.S. Geological Survey
2280 Woodale Dr.
Mounds View, MN 55112
Phone: 763-783-3253
pmjones@usgs.gov

Dawn Kaback, Ph.D.
Principal Geochemist
AMEC
2000 S. Colorado Blvd., Suite 2-1000
Denver, CO  80222
Phone: 303-324-7761
dawn.kaback@amec.com
Tom Kady
U.S. EPA, Environmental Response Team
2890 Woodbridge Avenue, MC: 205A-ERT
Edison, NJ  08837-3679
Phone: 732-906-6172
kady.thomas@epa.gov

Ranju Kama, Ph.D.
Graduate Research Assistant
Kansas State University
2004 Throckmorton Hall
Manhattan, KS 66502
Phone: 785-532-7281
rkarna@ksu.edu

Steven Lange
Director Geochemistry, Geohydrology, and
  Hydrology
Knight Piesold and Company
1999 Broadway, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202-5706
Phone: 303.867.2254
slange@knightpiesold.com

Brady Lee
Senior Research Scientist
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.O. Box 999,MSIN K3-61
Richland,WA 99352
Phone: 509-371-7142
brady.lee@pnnl.gov

Brian Looney, Ph.D.
Research Environmental Engineer
Savannah River National  Laboratory
773-42A, Env. Stewardship
Aiken,SC 29808
Phone: 803-725-3692
brian02.looney@srnl.doe.gov

Michele Mahoney
Soil Scientist
U.S. EPA
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 5203P
Washington, DC  20460
Phone: 703-603-9057
mahoney.michele@epa.gov
                                             89

-------
                 National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                        August 12-14, 2014 * Albuquerque, NM
                        List of Speakers and Poster Presenters
Thomas McComb, C.P.G.
Senior Geologist
Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc.
211 Commerce St.
Nashville, TN 37201
Phone: 615-252-4349
thomasd.mccomb@gmail.com

Virginia T. McLemore, Ph.D.
Senior Economic Geologist
New Mexico Bureau of Geology-New Mexico
  Tech
801 Leroy PL
Socorro,NM  87801
Phone: 575-835-5521
ginger@nmbg.nmt.edu

Ed Moreen, P.E.
Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA
1910 Northwest Blvd., Suite 208
Coeur d'Alene, ID  83814
Phone: 208-664-4588
moreen.ed@epa.gov

Tom Moyer, Ph.D.
Senior Geologist
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
113600 W. 60th Ave.
Arvada, CO 80004
Phone: 720-984-4146
moyertc@bv.com

Olufunsho Ogungbade
Research Engineer
Freeport-McMoRan
1600 E. Hanley Blvd.
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
Phone: 520-498-6517
olufunsho_ogungbade@fmi.com

A. Ola Opara, Ph.D.
R&D Manager
Inotec
2712 S. 3600 W, Suite A
Salt Lake City, UT  84119
Phone: 801-966-9694
opara.ola@gmail.com
Christopher Peltz
Scientist
Research Services LLC
1027 Mineral St.
Silverton,CO  81433
Phone: 970-691-6351
chris@researchservicesco.com

Melissa Rhodes
Environmental Process Engineer
Colder Associates Inc.
44 Union Blvd., #300
Lakewood, CO 80228
Phone: 303-980-0540
melissa_rhodes@golder.com

Joshua Richardson
Student
Ohio University
3825 Brahman Rd.
Las Cruces, NM 88012
Phone: 740-707-7939
jr282105@ohio.edu

Robin Richardson
Acting Director
U.S. EPA
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9048
richardson.robinh@epa.gov

William Roper, Ph.D.
Director of Research
Micronic Technologies
P.O. Box 3670
Norton, VA 24293
Phone: 703-444-2011
wroper@micronictechnologies .com

Marc Schlebusch, P.E.
Environmental  Engineer
COM Smith
9200 Ward Pkwy., Suite 500
Kansas City, MO 64114
Phone: 816-444-8270
schlebuschm@cdmsmith.com
                                             90

-------
                 National Conference on Mining-Influenced Waters
                        August 12-14, 2014  * Albuquerque, NM
                        List of Speakers and Poster Presenters
Matt Schultz
Geoscientist
NM Environment Department
3082 32nd St. ByPass, Suite D
Silver City, NM 88061
Phone: 575-956-1550
matthew. schultz@s tate .nm.us

Ian Sharp
Chief of Feilding Operations
FLUTe
2412 Princeton Dr. NE, Suite B
Albuquerque, NM 87107
Phone: 505-883-4032
ian(o),flut.com
Philip Sibrell, P.E.
Engineer - Research
U.S. Geological Survey
Leetown Science Center, 11649 Leetown Rd.
Kearneysville, WV 25430
Phone: 304-724-4426
psibrell@usgs.gov

James Sickles, California Certified Geologist
Superfund Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA Region 9
75 Hawthorne St., SFD-7-2
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-972-3265
sickles.james@epa.gov

John Sigda, Ph.D.
Senior Hydrogeologist
INTERA Incorporated
6000 Uptown Blvd. NE, Suite 220
Albuquerque, NM  87110
Phone: 505-246-1600
j sigda@intera.com

Carlos Tarnayo, Ph.D.
Environmental Manager
Barrick Gold Corporation - Pueblo Viejo
#29, Lope De Vega Ave. Naco
Santo Domingo, 10124
Dominican    Republic
Phone:   809-331-7878
ctamayo@barrick.com
Michael Truex
Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.OBox999,MSK7-73
Richland,WA 99352
Phone: 509-371-7072
mj.truex@pnnl.gov

Tim Tsukamoto, Ph.D.
Principal Chemist
TKT Consulting
2050 Dnscoll Dr.
Reno,NV 89509
Phone: 775-846-9659
tkttim@gmail.com

Katie  Walton-Day, Ph.D.
Research Hydrologist
U.S. Geological Survey
Denver Federal Center, Box 25046, MS 415
Denver, CO  80225
Phone: 303-236-6930
kwaltond@usgs .gov

Charles Wisdom, Ph.D.
Senior Consultant
Geosyntec Consultants
1201 Third Ave., Suite 330
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-496-1451
cwisdom@geosyntec.com

Tzungmow Yao, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
GeoSystems Analysis
3393 N. Dodge Blvd.
Tucson, AZ  85716
Phone: 520-628-9330
myao@gsanalysis.com

Howard Young, L.G.
Senior Geologist
COM  Smith
1218 Third Ave., Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98034
Phone: 206-336-4914
younghs @cdmsmith .com
                                             91

-------