United State* Offic*of
Envlronm*m«J Protection R**carch and Otvrtopnwnt
Agmcy Washington, DC 20480
EPA-600/H-92-242
December 1992
&EPA Evaluation of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions Data From TVA
Coal-Fired Boilers
-------
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policy of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/R-92-242
December 1992
EVALUATION OF NITROGEN
OXIDE EMISSIONS DATA
FROM TVA COAL-FIRED BOILERS
by
Susan Stamey-Hall
Radian Corporation
Post Office Box 13000
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
EPA Contract No. 68-D1-0031
Work Assignment No. 002
Project Officer: Julian W. Jones
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
ABSTRACT
Current EPA emission factors (AP-42) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) from utility
coal-fired boilers do not account for variations either in emissions as a function of
generating unit load, or in designs of boilers of the same general type, particularly
wall-fired boilers. TVA has recently compiled short-term NOX emissions data from 30
units at 11 TVA coal-fired plants. These units include cyclone, cell burner, single wall,
opposed wall, single tangential, and twin tangential boiler firing designs. In this study,
the NOX emission rates from each boiler were calculated and compared with the
calculated rate for each boiler type using AP-42. Additional recent NOX data (from
non-TVA boilers) were also obtained from the literature, along with the data used to
develop the current AP-42 emission factors. Analysis of all these data indicates that:
(1) to varying degrees, NOX emissions increase with increasing load for all except
single- and opposed wall-fired boilers; (2) using the current AP-42 quality rating
scheme for the six boiler types, factoring in the TVA and recent literature data results
in improved quality ratings for all NOX emission factors - "A" (excellent) for those of
four of the six boiler types, "B" (good) for those of cell burners, and "C" (fair) for those
of opposed wall-fired boilers; and (3) there was no evident relationship between NOX
emissions and fuel nitrogen content or fuel ratio (fixed carbon to volatile matter).
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
ABSTRACT «
FIGURES v
TABLES vi
1 INTRODUCTION , 1
2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4
Cyclone Furnaces '. 4
Cell-Burntr Wall-Fired Units ............ 4
Horizontally Opposed Wall-Fired Units 5
Single Wall-Fired Units .,....,,... ... 5
Single-Furnace Tangentially Fired Units 6
Twin-Furnace Tangentially Fired Units 6
3 BOILER POPULATION 9
TVA Boilers 9
Non-TVA Boilers 11
Boiler Type Characteristics 16
Cyclone Furnaces 1i
Cell-Burner Units 16
Horizontally Opposed Wall-Fired Units 17
Single Wall-Fired Units .... 17
Tangontially Fired Units 17
Single-Furnace 17
Twin-Furnace 17
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Section Page
4 DATA ANALYSIS 18
5 RESULTS 20
Cyclone Furnace 20
Wall-Fired Units .... ., 24
Cell-Burner 24
Horizontally Opposed 29
Single Wall-Fired 29
TangentiaHy Fired Boilers 36
Single-Furnace , 36
Twin-Furnace 36
Other Results 43
Effect of Fuel Nitrogen 43
Effect of Fuel Ratio 43
6 EMISSION FACTOR RATINGS 47
7 REFERENCES 49
APPENDIX
A TVA TEST DATA , A-1
B TVA COAL DATA . B-1
IV
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1 NOX Emissions, Cyclone Furnaces 23
2 Effect of Load on NOK From Cyclone Furnaces 25
3 NOX Emissions, Cell-Burner Wall-Rred Units 27
4 Effect of Load on NO, Emissions From Cell-Burner Wall-Fired Units 28
5 NO, Emissions, Horizontally Opposed Wall-Fired Units 31
6 NOX Emissions, Single Wall-Fired Units 34
7 Effect of Load on NO, Emissions From Single Wall-Fired Units 35
8 NO, Emissions, Single-Furnace, Tangential Units 39
9 Effect of Load on NOE Emissions from Single-Furnace
Tangential Units 40
10 NOX Emissions, Twin-Furnace, Tangential Units 42
11 Effect of Load on NO, Emissions from Twin-Furnace Tangential Units .... 44
12 NO, Versus Fuel Nitrogen 45
13 NOX Versus Fuel Ratio 46
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 AP-42 Emission Factors 2
2 Summary of Average NO, Emissions from TVA and Non-TVA Units 8
3 TVA Boiler Population with NO, Emission Data 12
4 Boiler Population From Current AP-42 Reference List
and Literature Search 14
5 Summary of NOX Emissions Data for Cyclone Furnaces 21
6 Summary of NO, Emissions Data for Cell Burner Units 26
7 Summary of NOX Emissions Data for Horizontally Opposed
Wall-Fired Units 30
8 Summary of NOX Emissions Data for Single Wall-Fired Units 32
9 Summary of NO, Emissions Data from Single Furnace
Tangentially Rred Units 37
10 Summary of NO, Emissions Data from Twin Furnace Tangentially
Fired Units 41
11 Comparison of AP-42 Emission Factor Ratings 48
VI
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The current AP-421 document provides emission factors to estimate
nitrogen oxide (NOJ emissions from various coal-fired utility boilers burning
bituminous and subbituminous coal. The emission factors, expressed as pounds of
NOX per ton of coal burned, relate amount of NOX emitted to amount of fuel
burned.
Emission factors are provided for three major boiler types: cyclone,
tangentially fired, and wall-fired utility boilers (Table 1). No emission factors are
given for subclasses of these major boiler types, i.e., for single- or twin-furnace
tangential units; single wall-fired units; horizontally opposed wall-fired units; or cell-
burner wall-fired units.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Air and Energy
Engineering Research Laboratory has initiated a study to determine whether the
AP-42 document could be revised to include emission factors for each boiler
subclass, and to account for factors such as boiler design and coa! type.
To this purpose, NOX emission data and corresponding operating conditions
and coal information were obtained from the U.S. Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA) for 30 boilers at 10 different TVA coal-fired plants in Alabama, Kentucky,
and Tennessee. These units encompass all three major boiler types, and all
-------
TABLE 1. AP-42 EMISSION FACTORS
Utility Boiler
Type
Cyclone
Tangentially Fired8
Wall-Fireo*
AP-42 Section
1.1
1.1
1.1
Applicable
Load Range
60-110%
60-110%
60-110%
Emission Factor
Ib of NO,,/ton of
coal*
37
15
21
"Includes single-furnace and twin-furnace units.
blncludes single-wall, horizontally opposed-wall, and cell-burner units.
O Throughout this report, 1 Ib N0x/ton coal is the equivalent of 0.5 g NOx/kg coal
-------
subclasses in the tangential and wall categories. These data were summarized and
then compared to NO, emissions data calculated from the AP-42 emission factor.
Further analysis of the TVA data consisted of evaluating NO,, emissions as a
function of unit load. Initially, only NOM data from TVA units were to be evaluated.
However, TVA data were limited for several boiler types, so it was necessary to
include NQX data from non-TVA units.
The most recent NO, data were obtained through a literature search and
from the seven references cited in the current AP-42 document that are the basis
for the current AP-42 emission factors. These data were combined with the TVA
data by specific boiler category and used to: (1) determine if the TVA data could
be used to modify the AP-42 emission factors; (21 determine whether current AP-
42 emission factors are consistent with measured values; {3J identify any trends,
such as NQX as a function of load; and (4) determine new average NOX emission
rates for each boiler subclass.
Finally, a review of the emission factor rating was conducted to determine
whether including additional data would improve the factor ratings for each boiler
type. The rating is a measure of the quantity and quality of data used to generate
the emission factors.
-------
SECTION 2
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the review and analysis of the NOX emission data from both TV A and
non-TVA units, the following conclusions and recommendations for each boiler type
are provided.
CYCLONE FURNACES
1, NOX emissions from 12 cyclone furnaces ranged from 0.79 to
1.87 Ib/mBtu*, with an average of 1.22 Ib/mBtu {33 Ib/ton). This average
is 11 percent lower than the AP-42 rate of 1.37 Ib/mBtu. However, the
TVA units averaged 1.61 Ib/mBtu, which is 18 percent higher than the
AP-42 rate. The non-TVA units averaged 1.11 Ib/mBtu.
2. There Is a correlation between NO, and unit load. I.e., NO, increased
with increasing load,
3. The emission factor rating improves from "B" to "A" with these data.
4. There are no correlations between NO, and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio
(fixed carbon to volatile matter).
CELL-BURNER WALL-FIRED UNITS
1. NO, emissions from five cell-burner units ranged from 0.71 to 1.7
Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 1.21 Ib/mBtu (33 Ib/ton). This
average is 55 percent higher than the current AP-42 rate of 0.78 Ib/mBtu.
The TVA units averaged 1.53 Ib/mBtu, which is approximately twice the
(*) Throughout this report, "m" represents million, and 1 Ib/m Btu = 0.43 g/mJ.
-------
AP-42 rate. The non-TVA units averaged 1.02 Ib/mBtu. This clearly
indicates that the cell-burner units should be in a separate category from
other wall-fired boilers. However, data from more cell-burner units are
needed to define the emission factor and improve the rating.
2. There is a correlation between NOX and unit load, i.e., NOX increases
with unit load.
3. There is no current emission factor rating for cell-burner units; however,
these five units would be rated "B."
4. There are no correlations between NO, and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio.
HORIZONTALLY OPPOSED WALL-FIRED UNITS
1. NOX emissions from three horizontally opposed wall-fired units ranged
from 0.69 to 1.24 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 0.94 Ib/mBtu
(25 Ib/ton). This average is 12 percent higher than the current AP-42
rate of 0.78 Ib/mBtu. The TVA units averaged 0.76 Ib/mBtu, which
compares well with the AP-42 rate; however, the non-TVA units
averaged 1.08 Ib/mBtu. This shows that horizontally opposed units may
need a separate category; however, more data are needed to define the
emission factor and improve the rating.
2. There are not enough data to determine a correlation between unit load
and NOX emissions.
3. There is no current emission factor rating for horizontally opposed units;
however, these three units would be rated "C."
4. There are no correlations between NOX and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio.
SINGLE WALL-FIRED UNITS
1, NOX emissions from 15 single wall-fired units ranged from 0.59 to
1.12 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 0.85 Ib/mBtu (23 Ib/ton). This
average is 9 percent higher than the current AP-42 rate of 0.78 Ib/mBtu.
The TVA units averaged 0-81 Ib/mBtu, which is only 3 percent higher
than the AP-42 rate, while the non-TVA units averaged 0.90 Ib/mBtu.
There are sufficient data available to modify the emission factor for this
category.
-------
2. There is a correlation between NO, and unit load, with NOK increasing
with increasing load.
3. There is no current emission factor rating for single wait-fired units;
however, these 15 units would be rated "A,"
4. There are no correlations between NOX and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio.
SINGLE-FURNACE TANGENTIALLY FIRED UNITS
1. NOX emissions from 17 single-furnace tangentially fired units ranged
from 0.38 to 0.75 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 0.56 Ib/mBtu
(15 Ib/ton], which corresponds exactly to the current AP-42 emission
rate. The TVA units averaged 0.48 Ib/mBtu, which is 16 percent
lower than the AP-42 rate. The average for the non-TVA units was
0.60 Ib/mBtu.
2. There is a slight increase in NOX as unit load increases.
3. There is no current emission factor rating for this subclass; however,
these 17 units would be rated "A."
4. There are no correlations between NOX and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio.
TWIN-FURNACE TANGENTIALLY FIRED UNITS
1. NOX emissions from 12 twin-furnace tangentially fired units ranged
from 0.55 to 0.72 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 0.62 Ib/mBtu
(17 Ib/ton). This average is 11 percent higher than the AP-42 rate of
0.56 Ib/mBtu. The TVA units averaged 0.62 Ib/mBtu and the non-
TVA units averaged 0.63 Ib/mBtu. There are sufficient data to modify
the emission factor for this category.
2. There is a slight correlation between NO, and load with NOX increasing
with increasing load.
3. There is no current emission factor rating for this subclass; however,
these 12 units would be rated "A."
4. There are no correlations between NO, and fuel nitrogen or fuel ratio.
-------
Table 2 summarizes the average NOK emissions from TVA and non-TVA
units for each type of boiler.
-------
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF AVERAGE NO, EMISSIONS FROM TVA AND NON-TVA UNITS
Boiler Type
Cyclone Furnaces
Cell-Burner, Wall-Fired Units
Horizontally-Opposed, Wall-Fired Units
Single. Wall-Fired Units
Single-Furnace, Tangential Fired Units
Twin- Furnace, Tangential Fired Units
TVA Units
(Ib/mBtu)
1.61
1.S3
0.76
0.81
0.48
0.62
Non-TVA Units
(Ib/mBtu)
1.11
1,02
1.08
0,90
0.60
0.63
Average of TVA
ind Non-TVA Units
(Ib/mBtul
1.22
1.21
0.94
0.85
O.S6
0,62
AP-42'
(Ib/mBtu 1
1.37
0.78
0,78
0.78
0.56
0,56
•Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/lb.
09
-------
SECTION 3
BOILER POPULATION
TVA BOILERS
Beginning in 1989, the TVA began measuring NO. emissions from its coal-
fired utility boilers in order to develop a current emission inventory of
representative boilers in its system. TVA used the data to formulate a strategy for
complying with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Between 1989 and
1991, 30 boilers at 10 TVA coal-fired plants in Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee
were inventoried for NO,, oxygen (O2), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide
(C03), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) by TVA Research and Development personnel.
DataCollectionProcedure
The test programs conducted on each boiler were relatively short in duration.
Each unit was tested for approximately 8 hours and the data were then averaged
for specific test conditions. Testing was conducted at or near full load, and at
normal operating conditions. When possible, testing was also conducted at
reduced load and at varying boiler oxygen levels; however, there are very limited
data for these conditions.
Measurements were taken after the air heater at a representative point in the
duct with a single-point sampling probe. Gas was extracted from the duct through
a heated probe and conveyed to a mobile CEM system through a heated sample
-------
line. The following analyzers and measurement techniques were used to determine
the gaseous constituents of the flue gas:
Gaseous
Analyzer TjcjhniQ.ue
NO, TECO Model 10AR or Chemilumlnescence
Beckman Model 955
02 Beckman 755 Paramagnetic
CO Beckman 880 Nondispersive Infrared
CO 2 Beckman 880 Nondispersive Infrared
S02 Western Research Model 721 Ultraviolet Absorption
Each analyzer was calibrated prior to the first test of the day with a zero gas
and an upscale calibration gas (greater than or equal to the expected
concentrations). Additionally, each analyzer was checked periodically during the
test day and, if necessary, the calibration was repeated. The calibration gases
were either EPA Protocol 1 or NBS standard quality.
Data recorded from the control room instruments during each test were
evaluated to determine whether the boiler was operating under steady conditions.
If an upset occurred, data from that test were deleted from the data set. Data
were also omitted from the data set if a calibration check showed excessive drift.
Therefore, the data from each test period were subjected to the standard quality
assurance/quality control procedures set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations
Part 602 and were thoroughly screened for accuracy prior to any data analysis,
These data sets were made available to EPA in the form of Internal test reports and
on diskette.
There are a total of 30 boilers in the TV A data set. The boilers are
categorized as cyclone (2 boilers); cell-burner (2 boilers); opposed wall-fired
10
-------
(1 boiler); single wall-fired (9 boilers); single furnace, tangential (13 boilers); and
twin furnace, tangential (3 boilers).
Table 3 provides information on the TVA boilers that were tested. Each
boiler was assigned an identification code to be used for graphing purposes in
subsequent sections of this report. All the TVA boilers in Table 2 (1) are pre-
NSPS, (2) fire bituminous coal, (3) have no controls for NO,, and (4) are dry
bottom boilers except for the cyclone furnaces.
NON-TVA BOILERS
Table 4 contains data for the 34 boilers identified through the literature
search and from references in the AP-42 document. The boilers are categorized as
cyclone (10 boilers); cell-burner (3 boilers); horizontally opposed wall-fired (2
boilers); single wait-fired (6 boilers); single-furnace, tangential (10 boilers); and
twin-furnace, tangential (3 boilers). Data for these boilers were summarized by
boiler type and added to the TVA data set for analysis.
For the boilers referenced in Table 43, only data for tests conducted under
normal operating conditions were analyzed. Data from tests conducted under low
NOX conditions (i.e., low excess air, burners-out-of-service, overfire air in operation,
etc.) were not used in the analysis. Units were added to the data set only if they
were comparable in size to other units already in the data base. For example, units
in the AP-42 references that were less than 30 MW were not included.
11
-------
TABLE 3. TVA BOILERS THAT HAVE NO, EMISSION DATA
ID
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
Plant
Allen
Paradise
Cumberland
Cumberland
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Shawnee
Shawnee
Shawnee
Shawnee
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Unit No.
1
3
1
2
5
3
4
7
8
10
2
6
B
9
1
2
3
Boiler
Mfgr.
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
CE
CE
Capacity
MW
330
1150
1300
1300
550
200
200
170
170
170
175
175
175
175
125
125
125
AP-42 Major
Category
Cyclone
Cydcme
Walt
Wall
Waff
Wan
Wall
Wall
Wail
Wall
Wall
Wall
Wall
Wall
Wall
Tangential
Tangential
Subclass
N/A
N/A
Cell
Cell
Opposed
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single
Single-Furnace
Single-Furnace
Single-Furnace
Coal Type
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Test Date
1/iO
3190
7/89
7/89
9/89,
7m
7/91
3/90
8/90
8/90
8/90
2/91
12/89
12/89
5/89
6/91
4/90
6/91
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 3. TVA BOILERS THAT HAVE NO, EMISSION DATA
(CONTINUED)
ID
R
S
T
U
V
w
X
Y
z
AA
BB
cc
DO
Plant
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Kingston
Gallatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
John Sevier
John Sevier
John Sevier
Kingston
Widows Creek
Widows Creek
Unit No.
4
5
6
4
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
7
8
Boiler
Mfgr.
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
Capacity
MW
125
125
125
175
300
300
300
200
200
200
200
575
550
AP-42 Major
Category
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Subclass
Single-Furnace
Singte-Fumace
Single-Furnace
Single-Furnace
Single-Furnace
Singte-Fumace
Single-Furnace
Single -Furnace
Single-Furnace
Single -Furnace
Twin-Furnace
Twin-Furnace
Twin- Furnace
Coal Type
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Test Date
S/91
6/91
6/91
3/90
7/90
8/90
8/90
10/90
10/90
10/90 ,
3/90
4/90
8/89
-------
TABLE 4. BOILER POPULATION FROM CURRENT AP-42 REFERENCE LIST
AND LITERATURE SEARCH
ID*
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
L1
L2
Ei
L3
EtO
L4
LS
E11
E1Z
E13
Plant
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Miles
Nelson Dewey
Four Comers"
Four Comers?1
Hariee Branch
Crist
Hammond
Widows Creek"
Widows Creek0
Crist
Unit
NO,
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
1
2
4
4
3
7
4
5
6
6
Boiler
Mfgr.
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
FW
FW
B&W
B&W
FW
Capacity
MW
206
Unknown
200
Unknown
240
704
Unknown
300
108
too
800 .
800
480
500
500
125
125
320
AP-42 Major
Category
Cyclone
Cydone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cydone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cydone
Cydone
Wall
Wall
Wall
WaH
Wall
Walt
Wall
Wall
Subclass
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cell
Cell
Cell
Opposed
Opposed
Single
Single
Single
Coal Type
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Bituminous
Bituminous
Suboituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Reference
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
6
7
6
8
9
6
6
6
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 4. BOILER POPULATION FROM CURRENT AP-42 REFERENCE LIST
AND LITERATURE SEARCH (CONTINUED)
ID"
614
E15
L6
E16
E17
E18
E19
E20
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
E21
E22
L12
Plant
E.D. Edwards
Dave Johnson
Edgewater
Comanche*
Naughton
Barr/
Barry
Dave Johnson
Smith
Hunter
Lawrence
Cherokee
Valmont
Barry
Navajod
Kingston
Unit
No.
2
2
4
1
3
2
4
4
2
2
5
4
5
3
2
€
Boiler
Migr.
RS
B&W
B&W
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
Capacity
MW
256
105
105
350
330
130
350
340
180
400
400
350 •
165
250
800
200
AP-42 Major
Category
Wall
Wall
Wall
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Subclass
Single
Single
Single
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Twin Furnace
Twin Furnace
Twin Furnace
Coal Type
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
SubbMuniinous
Bituminous
Reference
6
6
to
6
6
€
6
e
11
12
13
14
14
6
6
15
"E - units Identified through AP-42 references, L - units identified through the literature search,
"Identified In both the AP-42 reference list and in the literature search,
TVA boiler,
'Unit is equipped with overtire air ports for NO, control. Data from baseline operation (i.e., normal firing with
overt ire air ports dosed) were used in the analysis.
-------
BOILER TYPE CHARACTERISTICS
Cyclone JFyrnaces
Cyclone furnaces consist of a water-cooled horizontal cylinder in which the
fuel is fired and heat is released at extremely high rates. Originally, the cyclone
furnace was designed to burn troublesome coals that had high ash content and low
ash fusion temperatures. These characteristics can make fuel difficult to burn in a
conventional pulverized coal combustion system.3
This type of firing has distinct advantages and disadvantages. The primary
advantage is that troublesome coals can be burned economically. Other
advantages include the ability to operate at lower excess air, low carbon loss with
bituminous coals, higher boiler efficiency at full load, less total paniculate matter
emitted from the furnace, production of more suitable ash for landfill purposes,
smaller furnace size, and low coal preparation costs (no pulverizers). In addition,
cyclone furnaces are easily conveyed to burn other types of fuel. The main
disadvantages include limited operating flexibility, high NO, emissions, high
pressure drop, and high carbon loss (Western coals). Also, these furnaces cannot
be retrofit with conventional low-NOx burners.
Cell-Burner Units
In the 1960's, economic considerations dominated boiler design and led to
the development of the cell-burner. These units are a special category of wall-fired
units in that (1) they are horizontally opposed, with two rows of burners on each
wall, and (2) each burner consists of closely spaced vertical nozzles (2 or 3 nozzles
in a cell). The burner produces a compact, intense flame compatible with the
relatively small furnace volume. These compact furnaces produce high heat
release rates and generally exhibit high NO, characteristics.
16
-------
Horizontally Opposed Wall-Fired Units
Horizontally opposed wall-fired units consist of several rows of standard
circular burners on two opposed walls of the furnace. The burner spacing and the
heat release rate are relatively the same as for the single wall-fired unit.
Single Wall-Fired Units
Single wall-fired units consist of several rows of standard circular burns on
one wall (front or rear) of the furnace.
TangentialIvJ1!red Units
Single-Furnace-
A tangentialiy fired unit with a single-furnace boiler system consists of four
corner wtndboxes containing separate, vertically stacked nozzles that emit distinct
levels of fuel and air. This design promotes strong ignition near each corner. The
bulk mixing process caused by the rotating fireball pattern ensures complete mixing
of the fuel and air. The tangential design emits lower NO* than cyclone or wall-
fired boilers.
Twin-Furnace-
A tangentialiy fired units with a twin-furnace boiler system consists of one
furnace as the superheat furnace and an other as the reheat furnace. Therefore,
there are eight corner windboxes containing separate, vertically stacked nozzles
that emit distinct levels of fuel and air. As with the single furnace, this promotes
strong ignition near each corner and ensures complete mixing of the fuel and air.
This design also emits lower NOX than cyclone furnaces or wall-fired boilers.
17
-------
SECTION 4
DATA ANALYSIS
The data from each boiler OVA, AP-42 referenced data, and data from the
literature search} were analyzed by the following methodology:
1. The data from each boiler were categorized in a spreadsheet by AP-42
boiler type and subclass. Data consisted of load (MW) and NOX
(tb/mBtu) and were averaged for similar test conditions. For example,
if there were 10 data points for a specific boiler taken near the same
load (+ /- 5 percent), then the NOX emissions and unit load were
averaged. The average values are reported in the summary tables for
each boiler category (see Section 5).
2. The percent load for each test average was calculated and the data
from loads less than 60 percent were excluded because the AP-42
factors are valid for loads of 60-110 percent only.
3, The NOM values were then averaged for the entire data set and
compared to the calculated emission rate. The difference between
actual data and the calculated emission rate was then determined.
The emission rate, Ib/mBtu, was calculated as follows:
AP-42 emission factor, —
ton
ib
2000
JL]
tonj
* 1,000,000
Btu
mBtu
18
-------
A heating value of 13,500 Btu/lb was used to calculate the emission rates
for all boilers types. The calculated emission rates are cyclone = 1.37 Ib/mBtu,
wall = 0.78 Ib/mBtu, and tangential = 0.56 Ib/mBtu.
4, The percent difference between the average NO, value and the
calculated emission rate was calculated as follows:
NO - AP-42 NO
* mBtu " mBtu . 100 B Percent difference
AP-49 NO
*" X' nx
mBtu
5, Bar graphs were generated for each boiler type category by using all
available data.
19
-------
SECTION 5
RESULTS
The results of the analysis of the NOX emission data from both TVA and non-
TVA units for each boiler type are discussed in this section. The NOX emissions
data for the TVA units given in Appendix A and fuel properties for the TVA units
given in Appendix B,
CYCLONE FURNACE
The data used to determine the difference between actual NOX emissions
and emissions calculated from AP-42 emission factors for cyclone furnaces are
summarized in Table 5. (Some of the data found in the AP-42 references did not
specify unit load, but rather percent load tested.)
The NOK data range from 0.79 to 1.87 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of
1.22 Ib/mBtu, which is 11 percent lower than the AP-42 emission rate of
1.37 Ib/mBtu. This corresponds to an emission factor of 33 Ib/ton. The overall
NO,, emission rate averaged 1.61 Ib/mBtu for the TVA units and 1.11 Ib/mBtu for
the non-TVA units. The complete data set is shown graphically in Figure 1
(percent load is shown in for each boiler).
20
-------
TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF NO, EMISSIONS DATA FOR CYCLONE FURNACES
ro
ID"
A
A
B
B
B
E1
E1
E2
E3
E4
E4
E5
E6
E6
E7
E7
E8
L1
L1
Plant
Alton
Alton
Paradise
Paradise
Paradise
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Niles
Miles
Unit No. Capacity, MW
1 330
1 330
3 1150
3 1150
3 1150
206
206
Unk.
200
Unk.
Unk.
240 '
704
704
Unk.
Unk.
300
1 108
1 108
Average Test
Load, %
60
82
77
85
91
75
95
75
95
85
95
95
75
95
65
75
95
82
100
Average
NO,, IWmBtu
1.13
1.71
1,68
1,64
1,87
0,92
1,36
1.19
1,19
0.85
1.14
1.12
1.04
1.4
0,94
0.92
1.32
0.79
0.92
AP-42,"
Ib/mBtu
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1,37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1.37
1,37
1.37
1.37
% Difference
Average - AP-42
-18
25
23
20
36
-33
-1
-13
-13
-38
-17
-18
-24
2
-31
-33
•4
-42
-33
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF NO, EMISSIONS DATA FOR CYCLONE FURNACES
(CONTINUED)
ID"
L2
L2
Average
Emission
Factor
Plant Unit No.
Nelson Dewey 2
Nelson Dewey 2
Average Test
Capacity, MW Load, %
100 75
100 100
Average
NO,, Ib/mBtu
1.24
1.34
1.22
33
AP-4E,"
Ib/mBlu
1.37
JJI
1.37
37
% Difference
Average - AP-42
-9
^2
-11
-11
"A and B - TV A units; E - units Identified through AP-42 references; and L - units identified through (he literature search.
"Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/lb.
ro
-------
3
<-•
m
fo S.
(A)
X
O
e.
1 9
1.8
1 7
1.6
1.5
14
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
o.y
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
—
r S'iC *
_
-
(D
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
-
-
is» n>
m
f—
G>
AP-42= 1.37
in
en
S
r-
! '
IO U> -*P
r*- o>
10 g
^
1/1
00
"
""*•*"*•"• »™===V,T
1
2
If)
r-
1 1 1 1 \ 1 I I I 1 I 1 i
xO
ff*
in
O)
g g
I _J
6 1 E7 _
^
gs 8
U) 'T-
IS.
^
8
_ T-
tf-
OJ
CD
"_J "
£8
i
L1
i
L2
E7
L2
Unit
Figure 1. NOx emissions, cyclone furnaces.
-------
There is a correlation between unit size and NO, emission rate, with larger
size units emitting higher levels of NOK. Data from eight cyclone boilers are shown
in Figure 2.
WALL-FIRED UNITS
Cell-Burner
Table 6 shows data from five cell-burner units ranging in size from 480 MW
to 1300 MW. The NO, data range from 0.71 to 1.7 Ib/mBtu, with an overall
average of 1.21 Ib/mBtu, which is 55 percent higher than the AP-42 rate of
0.78 Ib/mBtu. This corresponds to an emission factor of 33 Ib/ton.
The TV A cell-burner units averaged 1.53 Ib/mBtu, which is considerably
higher than the overall average; however, the TVA units are the largest capacity
units. The data from non-TVA units averaged 1.02 Ib/mBtu. The complete data
set is shown in Figure 3 (percent load is shown for each boiler).
Bearing In mind that this is a very small data set, there appears to be a
correlation between capacity and NOX emissions. The largest unit (1300 MW)
emits the highest NO,, and the smallest unit (480 MW) emits the lowest NOX.
Figure 4 shows this correlation.
Because this data set is so small, it is not evident whether there is a
correlation between NO, and percent load. However, it is clear that cell-burner
units emit substantially higher NOX than other wall-fired units and should not be
included in this category.
24
-------
m
10
(71
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
11
P
100
E5
B
300
500 700
Unit capacity, MW
900
1100
Figure 2. Effect of load on NOx from cyclone furnaces.
-------
TABLE 6, SUMMARY OF NO. tMISSIONS DATA FOR CELL BURNER UNITS
ID'
C
D
D
E9
E9
L3
E10
E10
Average
Emission
M Factor
Plant
Cumberland
Cumberland
Cumberland
Four Comers
Four Corners
Four Corners
Harlee Branch
Harlee Branch
Unit No.
1
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
Capacity, MW
1300
1300
1300
BOO
600
BOO
480
480
Average Test
Load, %
78
95
too
75
95
100
83
100
Average NOM,
Ib/mBtu
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.08
1.09
1.27
0.71
0.95
1.21
33
% Difference
AP-42" Average - AP-42
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
21
118
92
79
38
40
63
-9
22
-55.
S5
•Letters C and D = TVA units; E = units identified through AP-42 references; and L <= units identified through the literature search.
'Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/Ib.
-------
M
I.O
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1 1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
n
-
-
_
-
-
_
_
-
-
-
_
-
-
78%
95%
100%
|AP-42 = 0.78
100%
75% 95%
!
100%
83%
C D D E9 E9 L3 E10 E10
Unit
Figure 3. NOx emissions, cell-burner wall-fired units.
-------
s
.E
JQ
KJ
00
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1 h
0
E9
E10
E9
E10
300
500
700 iOO
Unit load, MW
1100
1300
Figure 4. Effect of load on NOx emissions from
cell-burner wall-fired units.
-------
Horizontally Opposed
Table 7 shows data from three horizontally opposed wall-fired units that
range in size from 500 MW to 550 Mw. The NO, data range from 0.69 to
1.24 Ib/mBtu, with an overall average of 0.94 Ib/mBtu, which is 21 percent higher
than the AP-42 rate of 0.78 Ib/mBtu. This corresponds to an emission factor of
25 Ib/ton.
The TVA unit averaged 0.76 Ib/mBtu, which compares well with the AP-42
rate. The remaining data set averaged 1,08 Ib/mBtu, which is considerably higher
than the AP-42 rate. Because of the small size of the data set, it is difficult to
determine any effect of unit capacity or percent load on NO* emissions. The
complete data set is shown in Figure 5 (percent load is shown for each boiler).
Single Wall-Fired
Table 8 shows data from 15 single wall-fired units that range in size from
105 MW to 340 MW. The NOX data range from 0.59 to 1.12 Ib/mBtu, with an
overall average of 0.85 Ib/mBtu, which is 9 percent higher than the AP-42 rate of
0.78 Ib/mBtu. This corresponds to an emission factor of 23 Ib/ton. The complete
data set is shown in Figure 6 (percent load is shown for each boiler).
The TVA units averaged 0.81 Ib/mBtu, which is only 3 percent higher than
the AP-42 rate of 0.78 Ib/mBtu. The remainder of the data set averaged
0.90 Ib/mBtu, which is 13 percent higher than the AP-42 rate. As shown in
Figure 7, there is considerable scatter in the NOX emission data for units 200 MW
and below. However, there is a trend of decreasing NO, with decreasing load.
Also, the larger size units tend to emit the highest NOX.
29
-------
TABLE 7. SUMMARY OF NOX EMISSIONS DATA FOR HORIZONTALLY OPPOSED WALL-FIRED UNITS
ID-
E
E
E
L4
L5
L5
LS
Average
Emission
Factor
Plant
Colbert
if
Colbert
Colbert
Crist
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Unit No.
5
5
5
7
4
4
4
Capacity, MW
550
550
550
500
500
500
500
Average Test
Load, %
63
70
86
100
60
80
96
Average NO,,
Ib/mBtu
0.85
0.69
0.75
0.95
0.98
1.13
1.24
0.94
25
% Difference
AP-42h Average - AP-42
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0,78
0.78
0.78
21
9
-12
-4
22
26
45
59
21
2!
letter E = TVA unit; and L = units identified through the literature search.
"Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/lb.
-------
l.t
1.3
.2
1.1
1
_ 0.9
5 0.8
E
^* 07
g 0.6
2 0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0,1
n
-
-
- •
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
63%
I
AP-42
i
70%
ss C
.
>.78|
86%
100%
60%
80%
96%
E E E U L5 L5 L5
Unit
Figure 5. NOx emissions, horizontally opposed wall-fired units.
-------
TABLE 8. SUMMARY OF N
-------
TABLE 8, SUMMARY OF NOX EMISSIONS DATA FOR SINGLE WALL-FIRED UNITS
(CONTINUED)
ID"
E13
E14
E14
E15
L6
Average
Emission
Factor
Plant
Crist
E.D. Edwards
E.D, Edwards
Dave Johnson
Edgewater
Unit No,
6
2
2
2
4
Capacity, MW
340
260
260
105
105
Average Test
Load,%
103
81
97
96
100
Average NO,,
Ib/mBtu
1.12
0,89
0.96
0.59
0.89
0.85
23
AP-42*
0.78
0.78
0.78
0,78
0.78
0.78
21
% Difference
Average - AP-42
44
14
23
-24
14
9
9
w "Letters F through N - TVA units; E * unfts identified through AP-42 references; and L « units identified through the literature search.
Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/to.
-------
I
E
X
O
1.1
•1
1
0.9
08
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
02
0.1
0
AP-42 = 0.78
—
-
s
_ O i
*
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
<#
i
?
>
""""
4 1
I #
&
r
E11
1""'™"'
Ell
I
~"
1
5?
0
O
E15
! 1
1
=15
—
— 1 V
) 1
#
O
*-
ifj
_
r^
o> ^
°-
CD
E\4
1 I
TE
EV
f
v
fcfi
Cfl
ilV
1
5
e
3
--•
5
Figure 6. NOx emissions, single wall-fired units.
-------
01
i
JE
B"
X
O
z
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
H
E11
E12
L6
E11
El 5
80 120
E13
El 4
160 200 240
Unit load, MW
280
E13
E13
._ _1 . L... i
320 360
Figure 7. Effect of load on NOx emissions from single wall-fired units.
-------
TANGENTIALLY FIRED BOILERS
gjngle-Furnace
Table 9 shows data for 17 single-furnace tangential units that range in size
from 125 MW to 400 MW. The percent loads tested in this data set range from
60-100 percent. The complete data set is shown in Figure 8 (percent load is
shown for each boiler).
The NOK data range from 0,36 to 0.75 Ib/rnBtu, with an overall average of
0.56 Ib/mBtu, which corresponds exactly with the AP-42 rate. The TVA units
averaged 0.48 Ib/mBtu, which is 16 percent lower than the AP-42 rate. The
overall NOM emission average for the non-TVA units is 0.60 Ib/mBtu, which is
slightly higher than the AP-42 rate.
As shown in Figure 9, there is considerable variation in the NO, emissions
from similar-size units. However, there is a slight trend of decreasing NOX
emissions with decreasing load.
Twin-Furnace
Table 10 shows data from 12 twin-furnace tangential units that range in size
from 200 MW to 800 MW. The NOX data range from 0.55-0.72 Ib/mBtu. The
overall average for the complete data set is 0.62 Ib/mBtu, which is 11 percent
higher than the AP-42 rate. This corresponds to an emission factor of 17 Ib/ton.
The complete data set is shown in Figure 10 (percent load is shown for each
boiler).
36
-------
TABLE 9. SUMMARY OF NO. EMISSIONS DATA FROM SINGLE-FURNACE TANGENTIALLY FIRED UNITS
CO
ID'
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
E16
E17
E17
E17
E17
E18
E19
E19
E20
L7
L7
L8
Plant
Johnsonvllle
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Kingston
Comanche0
Naughton
Naughton
Naughton
Naughton
Barry
Barry
Barry
Dave Johnson
Smith
Smith
Hunter
Unit No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
4
1
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
Capacity, MW
125
125
125
125
125
125
175
350
330
330
330
330
130
350
350
340
180
180
400
Average Test
Load, %
91
94
98
86
84
96
83
95
60
78
86
95
95
83
95
91
61
100
100
Average NO,,
Ib/mBtu
0,52
0.36
0.50
0,38
0,37
0.48
0.73
0.54
0.63
0.74
0.70
0.75
0.46
0.54
0,55
0.52
0,60
0.60
0,69
% Difference
AP-42b Average - AP-42
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0,56
0.56
0.56
-7
-36
-11
-32
-34
-14
30
-4
12
32
25
34
-18
.4
-2
-7
7
7
23
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 9, SUMMARY OF NOX EMISSIONS DATA FROM SINGLE-FURNACE TANGENTIALLY FIRED UNITS
(CONTINUED)
ID«
L9
L10
L11
Average
Emission
Factor
Plant
Lawrence
Cherokee
VaJmont
Unit No.
5
4
5
Capacity, MW
400
350
165
Average Test
Load, %
100
100
100
Average NOS,
Ib/mBtu
0.55
0.53
0.66
0.56
15
AP-42*
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
15
% Difference
Average - AP-42
-2
-5
18
1
1
•Letters O through U * TVA units; E • units Identified through AP-42 references; and L * units identified through AP-42 references; and
L - units Wen-ihyu through the literature search.
"Calculated by using 13,500 Blu/lb.
"Equipped with overflre air ports, therefore, baseline data without overfire air used in analysis.
-------
CO
CD
0.7
0.6
3 0.5
S
E
H °-4
X
O
Z o.3
0.2
0.1
0
AP-42
-
•
- * t
en a> 1
-
"™
-
-
^
u»
^
- 0-56] 1 1 *
!
'
i
5 ^
10 **•
|0 3
n*/
•^
O
^fcr
ID
O)
»
JO
CO
^1
i
xg
O5"
O ,«
O cr^
r- O
A %A
«sy 0**>
t- °
^ ^
-------
fiS
it
x"
O
i
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
n
_
U E17 El 7
. • E17 " LB
Lit • H
m E17
L7 L7 m __—--—•--
« » „_— — — It 9 ^
0 ___- *~— -"" ~~ ^" E19» E2° I y° »
__•— — ^*" • C<«5
_ — B|Q cio -
T" -E18
R
S *
-
-
-
,,,,,,, ,,
100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380
Unit load, MW
Figure 9. Effect of load on NOx emissions
from single-furnace tangential units.
-------
TABLE 10, SUMMARY OF NO, EMISSIONS DATA FROM TWIN-FURNACE TANGENTIALLY FIRED UNITS
fD'
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
OB
CC
DD
E21
E22
L12
Average
Emission
Factor
Plant
Gallatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
John Sevier
John Seviar
John Sevier
Kingston
Widows Creek
Widows Creek
Barry
Navajo
Kingston
Unit No.
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
7
8
3
2
6
Capacity, MW
300
300
300
200
200
200
200
571
550
250
800
200
Average Test
Load, %
87
85
85
100
100
100
100
90
76
100
100
90
Average NO,,
Ib/mBtu
0.58
0.6
0.59
0.56
0.69
0.64
0.64
0.72
0,57
0.55
0.67
Q.67
0,62
17
% Difference
AP-42" Average - AP-42
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
15
4
7
5
0
23
14
14
29
2
-2
20
20
11
11
•Letters V through DD = TVA units; E = units identified through AP-42 references; and L = units identified through the literature search.
Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/»b.
-------
XJ.O
0.7
0.6
3- 0.5
ffi
fl 0.4
>«•"«
6
z 0.3
0.2
« 1
n
-
-
t
87%
AP-42 = 0.56
85%
1
85%
100%
100%
•
100%
100%
90%
76%
100%
100%
*
90%
V W X Y Z M BB CC DD E21 E22 L12
Unit
Figure 10. NOx emissions, twin-furnace, tangential units.
-------
The TVA units averaged 0.62 Ib/mBtu, which is 11 percent higher than the
AP-42 rate. The remainder of the data set averaged 0.63 Ib/mBtu, which again is
higher than the AP-42 rate.
As shown in Figure 11, there is less scatter in the NO* emissions from units
of similar size than with the single-furnace tangential units. There appears to be a
correlation between unit load and NO,, emissions, with higher NO, being emitted
from the larger units.
OTHER RESULTS
Effect of fuel Nitrogen
Figure 12 represents NO, as a function of fuel nitrogen for the TVA data.
No clear trend is shown because most of the data fall within 0.4-0.8 Ib/mBtu for
fuel nitrogen values of 1.3-1.8 percent. The highest NO, is from the cyclone and
cell units. The fuel analysis for the TVA units is given in Appendix B.
Effect of Fuel Rajio
Figure 13 shows NOK as a function of fuel ratio for the TVA data. The fuel
ratio is the ratio of fixed carbon to volatile matter. Generally, NOX increases as the
fuel ratio increases;16 however, no clear trend can be established with the TVA
data.
43
-------
s*
00
i
X*
O
i
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-
—
cc
I ' E
L12-'AA
Y x^ DD
E21
-
_
_
i ii i i i i
100 300 500 700
Unit load, MW
Figure 11. Effect of load on NOx emissions
from twin-furnace tangential units.
-------
J^%
£
JE
2T
*— •
X
O
Z
£
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
00
.0
i
_ - ._
-
_
*
-
+
••
-
_
-
—
-
A&
n
&
« ? » ' V
-
-
V
_
1 ... 1 1 ? . «
1.30 1.50 1.70
Percent fuel nitrogen
• eye * cell o op_wall A s_wall < s_tan v tjan
Figure 12. NOx vs. fuel nitrogen.
-------
CD
3*
m
1
&
X
0
z
i
-
-
-
-
-
A A
A „ V
v a v v v
A
_
V
_
i i i __ . i i M L i , i i
1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60
eye
cell
Fuel ratio (FC/Vol)
op_wall A s_wall
s tan
t tan
Figure 13. NOx vs. fuel ratio.
-------
SECTION 6
EMISSION FACTOR RATINGS
The AP-42 document rates emission factors for pulverized coal-fired dry
bottom units and cyclone furnaces. Ratings are based on the number of units
tested, as follows;
A = 10 or more units (excellent)
B = 6-9 units
C = 2-5 units
D = 1 unit (poor)
The current AP-42 document shows an "A" Rating for pulverized coal, dry
bottom boilers. This rating is deceptive in that it includes both tangentially fired
and wall-fired boilers. The AP-42 references indicate that only seven tangentially
fired boilers and seven wall-fired units were tested. The current rating for cyclone
furnaces is "B."
A comparison of the number of units and ratings for the AP-42-references
boilers, the TVA boilers, and the boilers identified from the literature are shown in
Table 11. This table shows that emission factor ratings can be generated for boiler
subclasses by combining all the data. By doing so, "A" ratings are obtained for all
subclasses except for cell-burners ("B") and horizontally opposed wall-fired boilers
("C").
47
-------
TABLE 11. COMPARISON OF AP-42 EMISSION FACTOR RATINGS
Firing Configuration
Pulverized Coal-Fired Dry Bottom*
Cell Burner Wall-Fired
Horizontally Opposed Wall-
Fired
Single Wall-Fired
Single-Furnace Tangentially
Fired
Twin-furnace Tangentiatlv
Fired
Cyclone Furnace
Number of Units
AP-42'
14
2
0
5
5
2
8
TVA
28
2
1
9
7
9
2
Literature*
10
1
2
1
5
1
2
Combined
52
5
3
15
17
12
12
NO, Emission Factor Rating
AP-42*
A
NR"
NR
NR
NR
NR
B
TVA
A
C
D
B
B
B
C
Literature*
A
D
C
D
C
D
C
Combined
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
•AP-42 referenced boilers.
^Additional boilers from literature search.
'Includes cell-burner wall-fired; horizontally opposed wall-fired; single wall-fired; single-furnace tangentially fired; and twin-furnace
tangentially fired units.
'NR = No rating given in AP-42 document.
-------
SECTION 7
REFERENCES
1. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Compilation of Air Pollution
Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, AP-42,
Fourth Edition (GPO 055-000-00251-7). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 1985 [supplemented
October 1986 (GPO 055-000-00265-7) and September 1988 (GPO 055-000-
00278-9)], pp 1.1-1 -1.1-17.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 60,
Appendix A, Methods 3A and 7E, 7-1 -89 Edition.
3. Ctvrtnicek, T.E.. and S.J. Rusek. Applicability of NOX Combustion Modifications
to Cyclone Boilers (Furnaces). EPA-600/7-77-006 (NTIS PB263-960), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
January 1977.
4. Booth, R.C., R.E. Hall, R.A. Lott, A. Kokkinos, D.F. Gyorke, S. Durrani, H.J.
Johnson, J.J., Kienle, R.W. Borio, R.D. Lewis, an'd M.B. Keough. Rebum
Technology for NOX Control on a Cyclone-Fired Boiler. In Proceedings: 1991
Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447,
Volume I.
5. Yagiela, A.S., G,J. Maringo, R.J. Newell, and H. Farzan. Update on Coal
Rebuming Technology for Reducing NO, in Cyclone Boilers. In Proceedings:
1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447,
Volume I.
6. Crawford, A.R., E.H. Manny, and W. Bartok, Control of Utility Boiler and Gas
Turbine Pollutant Emissions by Combustion Modification - Phase I. EPA-600/7-
78-036a (NTIS PB281-078), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina. March 1978.
7. Vatsky, J., and T.W. Sweeney. Development of an Ultra-Low NO, Pulverized
Coal Burner. In Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary
Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
49
-------
8. Sawyer, J.W., and E.B. Higginbotham. Combustion Modification NOX Controls
for Utility Boilers. Volume II: Pulverized-Coal Wall-Fired Unit Field Test, EPA-
600/7-81-124b (NTIS PB82-227273), July 1981,
9. Wilson, S.M., J.N. Sorge, L.L. Smith, and L.L Larsen. Demonstration of Low
NOE Combustion Control Technologies on a 500 MWe Coal Fired Utility Boiler.
In Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control,
EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
10. LaRue, A.D. The XCL Burner - Latest Developments and Operating
Experience. In Proceedings: 1989 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion
NO, Control, Volume I, EPA-600/9-89/Q62a (NTIS PB89-220529), June 1989.
11, Hardman, R.R., S.M. Wilson, and J.D. McDonald. Advanced Tangentially-Fired
Combustion Techniques for the Reduction of Nitrogen Oxide (NO,) Emissions
from Coal-Fired Boilers. Presented at the Eighth Annual International
Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October 14-18,1991.
12. KokWnos, A., and R.D. Lewis. Field Evaluation of a Low-NQx Firing System for
Tangentially Coal-Fired Utility Boilers. EPA-600/7-85-Q18 (NTIS PB85-201093),
May 1985.
13. Thompson, R.E., G.H. Shiomoto, D.E. Shore, M.D. McDannel, and D. Eskinazi,
NO, Emissions Results for a Low-NOx PM Burner Retrofit. In Proceedings:
1989 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, Volume 1, EPA-
600/9-89/0623 (NTIS PB89-220529), June 1989.
14. Hunt, T.G., R,R. Hawley, R.C. Booth, and B.P. Breen. Retrofit Experience
Using LNCFS on 350 MW and 165 MW Coal-Fired Tangential Boilers. In
Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NOX Control,
EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
15. Higginbotham, E.B., and P.M. Goldberg. Combustion Modification NOX Controls
for Utility Boilers: Volume 1. Tangential Coal-Fired Unit Field Test. EPA-
600/7-81-1243 (NTIS PB82-227265), July 1981.
16. How Fuel Quality Affects NOK Formation - and CAA Compliance. Power
Magazine, July 1991, Volume No. 135, No. 7, p. 54-56, 81.
50
-------
APPENDIX A
TVA TEST DATA
51
-------
ALLEN UNIT 1
91/01/19
10JJ-1100
11M-111S
lllf-1127
Ilt9-114f
1UI-1290
1209-1211
1211-1211
124I-1SM
1199-llli
1111-1110
llS4-114f
114S-1490
141f-lU9
1 |_ltf *t tt^^Jf
1 ^tJV^L^f^mJ
I^*fc3 mmSt£3Cl
IN1T1
91/19/M
OI19-9US
M4S-1M9
1911-1141
104S-1199
1100-1111
iiointii
llli-1110
1119-1141
1141-1499
14M-141I
1411-1419
(1) (2) (1)
LOAD B01LCI VAN
HI tOI SOI
m
110
III
2fl
212
ITS
211
2f2
HI
III
111
211
291
2lf
211
211
*
*
u
*
*
V
m
•
•
*
*
*
*
»
.62
.11
.04
.92
.01
.99
41
.11
41
.If
44
.11
41
41
44
AIR BA1EI OUTLET '1* UK
2fl 29 41
2fl 14 .M
.41
42
.49
.49
111 140 .94
110 444 .94
191 140 .fl
211 149 f.U
199 140 1.41
(4) (i)
FAN VAN
NO, PPM NO
nOl LB/IGTt!
111!
1201
1111
1211
1211
1221
1241
11M
12M
1114
ail
1201
1141
1111
1112
.fl
42
.fl
44
41
41
.fl
41
42
41
41
.fl
.91
,41
41
1211 44
1211 .fl
1111 49
1040 .M
1129 .91
m 41
m 41
fil .91
111 41
III 141
111 141
C£M CIM
NO, PPM DO
not LB/WTV
14!
Ill
Ifl
901
114
III
921
112
994
111
111
119
Iff
til
114
41
41
41
.SO
41
41
41
41
41
.41
44
.19
4$
.29
41
tit 1.21
111 141
til 44
4lf 41
Ifl 41
Ifl 42
121 .11
(1)
CEI
S02
T.IO
141
f.ll
7. II
f49
f.ll
140
T.M
f.M
f.M
f.M
1.99
f.M
f.M
T.II
149
T.4I
.11
49
49
41
49
(1) Oalt ItU rtetrM trtif -II •!•. It m ttalrtl atirt.
(t) Attrifi atlltr 08, rtctH* tftif II all. IrM
mttitl ttwl.
(1) TM MaiirMMt »f diet 01, trr ttiltt II t«e. tM4ltn
•wr i li all. ptrl«4. («Ml CM«§)
(4) TM •MtirMiit tl NO, PM, otrrtct«l tt It OS, IS itc.
MiitM rite, HO, lfc/*ni, etleilittl irti VAN NO •uiutwiti
l»4 TAN t02,
001 •Miirewit 11 DO, Pf«, ctrrtctt* tt It 02, II all.
rtidiifs IrM ttttrtl leard.
-------
COLBERT UNIT 3
"•r>! o-j- iitiT- '> B»cr ?••; I.V-L' •• nun ~rc~
bk,..uw.\ tin. u Jhli-.M ..'jK «.JhJ 4tt.
&Mnf:
1717-1730
173&-1745
1 7*5-1 8Ct
1800-1615
18150:830
1830-1145
1845- 15?C
1906-1915
1915-1835
1930-1S45
1945-2900
2000-2015
2015-2C3C
2030-2045
2045-2100
2100-2115
2115-2130
tit
19S
195
;S5
290
200
200
2CO
20C
268
200
20C
20«
200
200
203
200
205
::.£5. sa2
D2 ppi,try
5.0
5.0
E.C
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
C f
K «
u. t
5.1
5.1
5,1
S.I
C *
s.o
5.0
5.8
492
48*
4P:
413
4S3
477
472
«i74
474
474
484
4S2
450
435
soc
499
502
... -VR-** ""'
I, cry pp«,cry
7. £3
7.75
7. 76
7.77
7,77
7. 78
7, El
7, BO
7.E1
7, 1C
7.80
7.75
7.80
7.75.
7.73
7.75
7.75
« 5
33.4
23,3
31.2
34,0
3fc.O
34.3
37.6
36,;
37. 1
4C.5
41.7
40.4
43,0
43.9
C.9
46,1
a:
r-n^-
vu*.
l,cry p
' • 77
il.Oc
10,97
10.5;
10,8s
10,75
10. 11
10.70
10.65
10.62
1C. 62
10,64
10.S1
J0.43
10.43
10,44
10.«7
3«,Bf>' 6
39;
405
407
iOE
40S
4-OS
405
410
41S
416
4li
416
413
414
417
417
414
C ?--
31 02 !
53C
552
tec
55£
55E
5ES
55S
550
565
5?1
571
567
564
" 562
567
5£8
564
{';
NC
0.72
0.76
0.7£
0,76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0,77
0.77
0.7E
C.7E
0.78
0.77
0.77
0.7£
0.7E
0.77
(1C)
SC2
1.27
-.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.24 '
1.23
1 ?"3
'. .22
4 **••
1.26
1.27
t.27
1.26
1.23
1.29
j.30
FILE AVS} 20C 5.0 486 7.77 3B.O 10,7: 4il 560 0,77 1,26
(I) Or,:*, ioac recordec every 15 Bin. froa coatro! boarc.
(2! Average boiler C2» ricorde:' every IE cin. fros
coatro! icarc.
(3) to 2tisareii.it of :'i::t SD2, fry sisis, *l sit, re^injs averaged
.ivsr.4 15 cin. ptrioc,
(4) Vgrs ceisuriBErii c' cue; C2» cry snis, 15 set. readings averigec
cvir i 15 tin. period,
(5) Van aee£ureiei>t cf CO, ppa, dry &3s:s, 15 sec. readings iveracec
ever a 15 air,. ^ff:;t,
(6) Van ieiii.respr.1 of C"2, X cry. aasis, 15 sec. real-ings averictc
&«r a 15 cin. ptrio;;.
(7; Var. fieasureiEnt cf N", pps, iry oasjs, 15 sec. readings average'
over a 15 nin. perict.
(B) Van usisuretenl jf KC, ppt, ccrrectec to 31 02, 15 stc.
riidings am»Dtc over a IE tin. period.
(1) EiiSEion rate, NO, !&/aBTU (actual), calculatec froe VAN NO eeasureien:s.
(1C) Eisssion rate, SC2, Ib/iBTU, calculated froi VAN SD2 Kasureients.
53
-------
&:! I i*£E.:\E JIEDLiK LOftS "S'
COLBERT UNIT 3
07-l«-l99l :l; >i: 'I <*.' (51 (6? (71 [
"i'E .:A; eci.s 5:2 02 c: C02 n M
^ 22 ??5,,c-y Ifry pss»2ry I, cry- ppt,cry 1 2
0148-0200 122 5.2 512 i.'25 37.2 11.0* 34S
0200-C21E Ml 5.2 513 6.39 33. S 11.63 345
0215-0230 SS3 5.3 516 8.36 3£.fi 11.09 349
023C-0245 133 5,3 517 1.31 33.1 11.14 34i
0245-03*0 133 5.3 513 B.37 36.S 11.14 344
0300-0315 132 5.3 513 8.39 36.5 1.12 344
0315-0330 134 5,3 515 8.36 36.2 1.14 34E
0230-0345 134 5.2 516 6.33 3S,0 1.12 345
0345-0400 :S4 5,3 516 1.32 36.3 1.10 345
0«§C-0415 134 5.3 585 £.36 41.7 1.04 245
0415-042C 134 5.3 5l£ 1,35 31.5 11.04 341
0430-0445 134 5.0 519 B.33 43.9 11.05 350
0445-0503 IS' S.C 520 8.35 42.5 11.07 344
FIIE AV6: 134 5.2 515 1.36 31,0 11. Of 346
(1) Unit loac rfccsrcet every 15 air,, fret control soarif.
<25 Averac-t ill let C2» rtcerdif every 15 «in. froi
control aoarc.
(3) Van ipas-ref-en: o- :uc; SSI', ory basis, 15 sec. riacinss averaged
over a 15 sir.. ;er;cc.
(45 Van oeassrenern of cutt D2, cry bssii, 15 sec. rtasiinp amatfii!
oirer i IS c;n. period.
(5) Van, iiissrecsr.t jf CO, jspi, dry iasis, 15 sec. readings averastc
ovir A 15 tin. per:oc.
CS» Van ieasBTEaen: c-f CD2, I dry sasis, 15 set. reac:ngs averaged
ever « 15 si", ferloc,
(7! Van «fasyreier>t ;' «C, ppt, fry sasis, 15 sec, rcaeings averape
o«r 5 15 tin. perioc.
(8) Van ieasureaent cf SB, ppg, cerrecttc tc 31 32, 25 set,
reasinjs averagec over £ 15 Bin, perioc.
(3) Eeissior. rate, NO. ii:/aiTU (actus!}. cilculatec free VAX NO tKasiireients.
3)
i c; i
49fl
4S2
498
4S5
491
493
493
492
*91
41S
4S7
499
«1
49,
»
B/iat. :
0.6B
0.6B
0.66
O.S6
0.67
0.6?
C.6E
O.S7
0,67
0.£7
0.66
o.te
t-,67
0.68
{105
SC2 '
:/«5*3
1.39
1.40
1.40
1.41
1.35
1.4S
1.40
1.40
;.*C
1.37
:.
-------
COLBERT UNIT 3
SLE'.?T IX" 3 LOt KJ* RRNEE 7ES
-!-
IC30-1045
iO<£-HC'(i
noo-:iS5
1115-113C
1S3M145
H45-120C
1200-12:5
i TP-.* n^A
l.J.*ld iiJV'
1230-12*5
1245-13&0
1315-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
1400-1415
1415-1430
1430-1*^5
J 445- 1500
1500-1517
'tf
,09
1SS
199
196
:9S
194
553
:33
tdi
194
194
194
194
J94
1S5
195
19-
194
(2)
4, 1
3.8
'.' 5
V*tt
2.2
2,3
3.2
3.;
•3 1
•r. J
•> *!
3.2
2.3
3.3
2.2
3.2
3.2
3i 2
3,0
3.1
(2;
53£
53£
553
564
566
5£5
563
562
CCn
556
55£
55E
555
557
553
555
55£
552
V-y
7.61
7.<7
7.10
£.94
6. ee
£.87
6.E9
6.66
6 B3
6.84
6.62
LE2.
6.e:
6.79
6.76
6.74
£.72
6.71
Vftiv —
(E)
rn
spr.,cry
51.2
51.0
82.9
157.2
185.2
184.1
183.5
19B.7
196.6
I9B.6
204.6
214.2
214,2
209.0
220.2
222.7
2i7.5
240.1
(t)
I, cry
11.76
1J.B4
12.'.:
12.19
12.19
12.15
12.02
12.06
M CO
11.68
11.67
11,50
11.40
11.32
11.24
11.19
il.'J
11.20
KS
386, cry
426
415
399
393
2S3
296
357
395
400
404
464
406
410
410
410
410
413
410
(6)
kIC ?w
t 3: K
576
55^
517
503
502
505
50E
50?
509
514
514
517
520
' 519
519
519
521
516
(9.)
vG
0.7S
0.7s
0.71
0.69
0.6S
0.69
0.6S
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.71
0.7!
0.71
0.71
0.7:
0.71
n 7*
Vft # 1
(10)
SC2
1.37
1.36
1.37
1.3E
1.3B
1.37
i.37
1.36
1.33
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.34
1.35
1.34
1.34
1.33
1.33
195 3.3 555 6.S2 .'BD.O 11.72 *C5 SIS 0.71 1.35
(1; wit ic« recercec every 11 a:.-., fro* control boarc.
(2; AveragE is:ler C2, reccrae: every 15 tin. fros
cc.'irc. scsrc.
(35 Van eeasurEoer.t of tuct SC2, 3ry sasis, !5 s?:. reaciings aver i gee
over 'a :! sin, ;erio:'.
(4) l,'er: r,e£su-£ient c: ct:: 22, dry be5:E. IE sec. readincs averatei
over a 1* Gin. perioc.
(5) Van cei&ureisp*. j' C^, ppt, cry basis, 15 sec. readings averagee
over a 15 sin. perioc,
(6) Van cecsurenerit o' CC2, i cry Da;:sr 15 EEC. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. periot.
(7) Van ceasu'eeent of NO, ppi, dry basis, !5 sec. readings averager
over e 15 air,, period.
181 Van fteasureien: :.f NG, ppi, correc:ec to 31 22, 15 sec.
reaci.ias average: over i l! iin. perioc.
(S.i EcifSiC-ri r£;e, '.C, ib/cSTU (ic;jil;, calculated froi VAN NO aeisureients,
(10) Eiission 'ate, ?C2, it/oETL', calculated froc VA^ SQ2
55
-------
COLBERT UNIT 3
07-2^5:
0130-0145
Ct * 4. '"^^'^ fife
n 0'^'"'— f*("^ i ^
0215-0230
0230-0245
0245-0360
0300-0215
0315-0230
0330-0345
0345-0400
0*00-0415
04; 5-0*30
0426-0^45
0445-050C!
esoo-fcsis
C515-0530
C530-C54C
f
59
53
55
60
61
60
60
60
fc'3
£0
£0
66
60
60
60
60
60
*. i -
L
I.
6.
e i
5.6
6,3
6.3
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.!
6.0
£.0
6.i
5.B
6.0
6.C
sc?
477
411
485
472
469
463
460
457
446
457
45S
465
459
455
45§
455
452
(4}
02
* ,5
9,55
8.9C
9.15
9.20
$.25
137
9.40
9.48
3.31
S.26
9.2B
9.23
9.26
9.20
9. a
9.2S
VAS ™
15 /
T
90.0
85, 2
120.4
S3. 4
13.1
95.9
76. i
73.3
67.1
69.5
70.6
69.3
70.5
69.4
77.0
71.5
7«,6
(£5
3J2
:,c"ry a
9.93
10.05
10.14
9.90
9,85
9.76
9.6S
9.62
9.63
9,70
9.66
9.76
9.7S
9.65
9.77
1.89
9.66 .
!*"}
SC
141
145
133
140
142
139
14i
148
150
;st
!4f
146
146
145
142
!«£
146
IE)
1 21 a:
224
219
207
213
215
213
221
230
234
234
230
225
224
' 225
2:9
223
225
TO
X2
0.2;
0.30
0.2B
0.29
0.25
0.2S
0.3G
0,31
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.31
0.21
0.31
0,30
0,30
«.3i
522
1.3S
1.38
1.3B
1.37
1.37
1.36
1,3£
1.35
1.33
:.34
1.35
1.36
1.34
1.34
1,32
:.33
* * ***
6,0
463
3.25
B0.1 9.78
222
1.35
{;) an:: tc-5; reccrcec every 15 s:n. ""ros control soari.
(21 Average couer 02, rsco'dee every 15 tin. 'roa
control aoarc,
\2) Van teasurssent o* csitt S02, dry basis, 15 Sft. reiCiBfs a*«rapii
cvt* a 15 lifi. per;cc.
54) tfar. Efas^rtieni of gut; 32, cry iasii, 15 sec. reacincs averajei
over A i5 «ir,. per ice.
•-3; VeTi leastrecEa: of CC, ?it, sry aasis, 15 set. reannps avprjqes
ever a If wa. perjcc,
(B" Var, ntssureser.t of CQ2, 1 sry basis, 15 sec. readies averi|t£:
ever i 15 f.r,. periti,
(7; Var, •essurefient cf MC, ppi, cry basis, 15 sec. readings
ever « 15 ain. per.os.
(6> Van Hasurezent of SC, ppi, correctfc to 31 02, 15 sec.
reacirics averacec o*e? & 15 r.r,, ptTiot.
(S) £1:55ion rare, -W, ]5/i|TU (a:luil}, caUt-.atec froe VAN \0
(10) Ecissfon rate, SC2, 15/iBTiJ, caitulaieC-fros VAK SS2
56
-------
COLBERT UNIT 4
RESULTS
A summary of the testing is listed below.
is the attached graph.
3/7/90 UNIT 4 ESP INLET
The data is shown
TIME
PERIOD
0909-0915
0915-0930
0930-0945
0945-1000
1030-1045
1045-1100
1100-1115
.1115-1130
********
1219-1230
1230-1245
1245-1252
1530-1545
1545-1600
AVERAGES
(1)
LOAD
198
199
199
199
199
198
200
200
200
125
125
125
125
125
125
(2)
BOILER
p2
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
.1
.1
.2
.5
.6
4.3
(3)
VAN
*O2
DRY
7.9
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.5
8.5
8.4
8.4
0.2
9.0
9.0
9.1
9.1
9.0
9.0
(4)
VAN
NO. ppm
3* 02
457
454
468
463
512
471
472
481
472
520
501
500
406
399
475
(5)
VAH
NO
Ib/mBtu
0.66
0.65
0.67
0.67
0.74
0.68
0.68
0.69
0.60
0.75
0.72
0.72
0.59
0.50
0.67
NOTES:
(1) Average unit load, recorded every 15 min. from control board.
(2) Average boiler O2X, recorded every 15 min. from control board.
(3) VAN measurement of 02k on a dry basis; 15-sec. readings averaged
over a 15 min. period.
(4) VAN measurement of NO, ppm, corrected to 3k 02; 15-sec. readings
averaged over a 15 min. period.
Emission rate-, NO, Ib/mBtu, calculated from VAN NO measurements
and VAN %02.
57
-------
COLBERT UNIT 5
07-16-1S9!
~"*E
1630-1645
1645-1700
17CD-17I5
1715-1730
1730-1745
1745-18W
1BOC-1E15
1615-1630
LOAD E
Rk
457
46E
470
472
473
470
472
«
.:2L
C"
M
U 1
ti»
3.
•3
w«
3.
3.
2.
*•
(2; («
:^^' J.
Vfi,
CO
3?c,dry /.,cry pps.dry
0
0
0
3
S
7
7
6
124E 6
127' £
1275 £
1277 £
1265 6
127* £
12B£ 6
12E1 £
.96
.75
.75
.73
.64
.72
.63
.65
47.7
65.7
75.0
7C.£
75.2
70.5
96.1
79.0
(6)
C22
(7)
SC N
I, dry ppc,dry 1
12.15
12,31
12.31
12.33
12,35
12.35
12.44
12.41
37B
3SE
4C3
£05
401
403
4C!
403
(B)
D Pfr.
2Z £2 ;
48£
50i
505
512
50'
509
502
50£
(SJ
:o/«t:i ;
C.£7
O.E9
0,73
C.70
O.tS
0.70
O.fcS
o.ss
^r
::/«:a
£.05
2.0E
S.C7
3.)"
3;. Ob
3.0)
3.07
3.0£
FILE AV6: 471 3.5 1276 6.73 72.5 12.34 399 504 0.69 3.07
(1) Unit loac recorded every 15 tin, froi control boari.
(2) Average boiler D2, recorde:; every 15 lin, free
control Soard.
(3) Van leasureaent of cuct 5C2, dry lasis, 15 sec. readings averagec
over a 15 i.r, oerioc.
SO I'ar, leasureser.t c; cue: 32, cry iasis, 15 sec. readings averaged
ever a 15 C;R. perioc.
f.SJ Vai teasirrjeer.t of C2, ?pt, dry :a5:s, 15 sec. reacings jveragei!
e-ver a 15 r.r.. peTioc,
i£5 Van tiasureaent of Cil', I cry ;.ii:s, 15 sec. readings averaged
c=ver a 15 sir., perioc,
(7) Van Beasureient of SJ, spe, cry b-sis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over, a 15 ;in. perio:.
^3) vr. leasureten- of NO, ;at, cc'rectec to 31 D2, 15 sec.
readings averaged over i 15 t;?-.* ;eria:.
(9) EBJSSJOP rate, \D, li/iBT^ iaci^a:;, calculated fro» VAN NO «aiure«BRt5.
(10} £a:ssian rate, S22, Is/oET:, cilculate: fret VAN SC2 «asureter,ts.
58
-------
COLBERT UNIT 5
C7-17-1991
T:SE
1119-1130
1130-1145
1 145-1 20C
'.200-1215
1215-1230
1230-1245
1 245-1200
1300-131B
•;:;
HAD
Kk'
474
474
4£9
4£9
470
473
473
475
(2)
ECLES
C2
3,
3.
3.
3.
w*
3.
H I
u.
(35
SD2
ppt.cry
7 1150
7 1B7
r
5
5
7
7
7
1 Q?
. 3t
;s3
18:
IS!
1B3
17S
r.'t
l,iT)
8. 02
7.97
8.01
7.58
B.Ci
7.9E
7.54
7.55
«.\ •--•
CO
fPMry
14.4
19.3
23. 1
24.2
25. B
26.4
2S.3
2B.6
(6)
CD:
l,cry
11.54
11.52
11.45
11.48
11.40
11. '0
11.42
11.36
(1\
VC
ppe,cry
423
426
423
42-!
425
424
422
42*
CS>
KG ?D-
1 21 22
586
583
5E7
5EB
59C
5B7
563
5B8
(S;
\G
ib/catt
c.e;
O.Bl
0.80
O.EO
0.81
C'.E'v1
0.80
0.30
CO)
S32
iS/BCtL
3.04
3.12
3.15
3.2<
3.12
^ , *
ta»t • a
3,!0
FILE AVfi:
472
1130 7.99 23.9 11.45
424
5E7 Ci.BO
3.II
C) Unit loa: reiorcec every :5 eir,. froc control fcoarii.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 air,, froe
centre! boare,
(3! Van teasureient of duct £02, cry aasis, 15 sec. readings average^
over a 15 Bin. period.
(4) Van leasureien: of cuct D2t cry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 cin. perioc,
(5) Van leasureeen: cf CC, ppc, cry aasis, 15 sec, readings average:
over o 15 *is» jerioc.
(£) Van •easureien: of C02, I cry b^sis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over o 15 Bin, pericf.
(7) Van BEasureae.it cf SC, p?e, cry aasis, :! sec. reac-ings averaaec
over t 15 tir,. ;er;oc,
(B) Van «easureaent o* X3, u?t, cor'ec:ee! to 3* 02, 15 sec.
reitinss averagec over a 15 *.n. aer:o;.
(9) Eaission rate, NCj Ij/BsTl uctuo!), calculate: froi VAN' MD
CO EsissioR rate, SD2, ifc/sBTSJ, calculated fret VAK SD2 §easure«ents.
59
-------
COLBERT UNIT S
*;*£
C345-0430
0400-0415
0415-0430
0430-0445
0445-0506
0500-05J5
0515-0520
0530«05<5
-SAD
Mi
34S
34£
34B
351
343
343
343
346
12!
KILE?
W*.
5.5
5.5
Uf 1
5.7
5,2
5.2
5,2
5.2
•f2";
332
PW.cry
,,«
us?
I'M
11 SB
1194
12C4
1203
!20*
<«
n**
Ircry
7,f5
8.02
E.02
6.05
6.0£
7. SB
7.96
7.99
Vfeiv
(5)
C3
ppt.dry
20.7
21.4
22.3
21.7
22.2
22.5
23.6
23.6
{£)
CC2
lttVj
::M
11.47
11.47
;i,4B
11.46
11,56
11.6;
11.64
C7)
NC
ppt.cry
423
*32
432
429
427
42S
423
«£
(£•
€ ?'".';
f 3'i 02
5SS
£01
691
598
5S£
595
595
58:
t C |
c
.:/«!,
C.62
O.i2
C.B2
O.B2
0.82
0.81
0.8;
O.J3
i;S;
ss:
15/S31L
3,04
3.17
Wf *V
3.17
•3.17
3.11
3.S7
3.18
flLE AVEt
346
JIS4
8.01
22,3 1J.53
557
(!.E2
3.;5
(i) 'Jr.it Icac rtcorcei cvtry 15 tic. fro* cor,trc; Doarti.
<2J Average 3o;;er Si, rscorcet every :E tin. froi
coatrs; btirt.
(3) tfin Masumen: of tact 502, cry iK:s, 15 stc. rial-ings
over 2 IS lie. per;;:.
M5 VIB iBeStrgKn; of sact S2, cry aisis, 15 sec. readings
ever s 15 tin. pericc.
(5^ Var. aeoSiirgsEnt c; :„, pje, cry ;as:s, 15 sec. readings avtraftd
over a 15 «in. pe'ioc.
(S) Van eees>ireDent of C32, 1 iry tasis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over o 15 Bin. pence.
(7) Wan aeasurs»in: of NO, pan, cry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a *.5 nc. pericc.
(S) Via Masureier.: of fit. ;.:.n, ctrrt::fi! to 2J 02, 15 sec,
readings avtraaic OVP a 15 ein. perio;.
(9) Etissicn raie, SC,( »;./«BT 'ictus'.), calculate fro* VAS XD wisureients.
(10) Efiiss;ar, rate, SG2, lii/aBTL', calculated Iron VAX SC2 nasureients.
60
-------
COLBERT UNIT 5
C2-EE-T UMT 5 "Z:> :\JL* A-l DJC
07-17-1SSI
TIHE
OE45-C700
0700-0715
0715-0730
0730-0745
0745-0800
OECO-OB15
0815-0830
OB30-OB45
'. * ,'
.3AS 2
ML
348
34£
347
331
35:
345
346
34S
(2)
DUES
SC2
D2 ppc.c-ry
£.C
£.0
6.0
£.:
£.;
t, »j
5.3
5.3
1072
1075
IC7£
:o7s
1073
1077
1GE3
,060
— VftK
«; (5)
I, cry ppe.dry
S.24
9.29
9.3:
9.24
5.25
3.23
9.22
3.25
?« 1
41 • it.
22.0
23.5
24.0
24. <
25.5
26.:
27.2
(6)
C32
KG M
I,ery ??s,cry 6
10.58
10.50
10.46
10. 5£
10.51
10.5J
It. 54
10.52
430
3.13
3,15
3.1£
3.15
3.15
3.14
3. It
3. It
FILE AV6: 349 5.B J077 9.2£ 24.2 10.53 41B 643 0.8B 3.15
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 Bin. froE control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 Bin. free
control boarc.
(3) Van leasuremt of due: SD2, cry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 t:r.. per.&c,
(4! Van teasufeHfit ci iact C2. cty aasis, 15 sec. readings averagetf
over > 15 s;r<, perjor,
':) Vsr BEJsareten: gf CD, ;pn, cry basis, 15 sec. reacings aversaec
over a 15 i:n, per lot.
(£.- Van geasureae.it t: C22, 7. dry ^asis, 15 sec. readings averager
(7! Varr . BEBSa' esen t c-f NC, p;t, ::y basis, 15 sec. reacings averaged
over * '.t tir,, sersoii.
fB) Van leasureeent of fr3, pp&, crr-etted ti 3Z C2, 15 sec,
rescinds avj'iqec ever a 15 Gin. perio:.
(3) Es:ssic.r, rate, NL, Ib/aBTl- tactual}, calcuiatei! free VAN SC Hasjreients.
(1C) Eoission rate, S32. la/BFU, cskulate^ fros VAN 802 «asure«nts.
61
-------
COLBERT UNIT 5
9/26/89 ES? IN LSI
FIGURES 5 &
TIME
PERIOD
-2100
2100-2115
2115-2130
2130-2145
2145-2200
-2230
2330-2345
2345-2300
6
(1 )
LOAD
385
384
384
386
385
387
386
385
-- LOW
(2 }
BOILER
02
5.5
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.5
5.3
5.3
LOA.P
<3 )
VAN
%02
DRY
8.4
8.4
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.6
8.6
8.6
(4 )
VAN
NO. ppm
3* 02
488
486
477
462
460
478
482
470
(5)
VAN
NO
Ib/mBtu
0 .70
0 .70
0.70
0.67
0 .66
0.71
0.69
0.68
(6)
CEM
*02
8.6
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
(7)
CEM
NO . ppm
3* 02
627
653
658
651
643
649
646
645
(8)
CEM
NO
Ib/mBtu
0 .90
0 .94
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
AVERAGES
385
5.4
8.5 475
0.69
8.6
647
0.93
NOTES:
(1) Unit load recorded every IS ml.n. from control board.
(2) Average boiler 02k. recorded every 15 min. from control board.
(3) VAN measurement of 02k on a dry basis; 15-sec. readings averaged
over a IS mln. period.
(4) VAN measurement of NO, ppm, corrected to 3* 02; 15-sec. readings
averaged over * 15 min. period.
(5) Emission rate. NO, Ib/mBTU. calculated from VAN NO measurements
and VAN *02.
(6) CEM measurement of 02k, actual, basis, read on a 15-rain, basis
from strip chart in control room.
(7) CEM measurement of NO, ppm, corrected to 3k 02, read on a 1.5-min
basts from strip chart in control room.
(8) Emission rate, NO. Ib/mBTU. calculated from CEM NO and CEM *02.
62
-------
CUMBERLAND UNIT 1
RESULTS
The results of the testing are as follows:
UNIT 1
7/6/89
11HE
PEFWOO
J*.QO-1215
1*-15-1230
1230-1245
1245-1300
1300-1315
131S-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
AVERAGE
UNIT 2
6/27/81
TIME
PERIOD
1200-1215
1215-1230
1245-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1345-1400
'400-1415
115-1430
130-1445
AVERAGE
LOAD
1020
1016
1015
1015
1015
1030
1015
1010
1015
LOAD
1223
1235
1235
1236
1230
BOILER
O2
6.3
6.6
6.4
6.5
6.5
6.7
6.5
6.7
6.5
BOILER
O2
-4.2
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.2
VAN
KO2
PIT
8.0
6.2
8.3
8.3
8.2
8*3
8.4
8.4
8.3
VAN
XO2
PRY
6.7
6.6
6,6
6.S
6.5
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.f
6.7
VAN
MO. PPM
3X O2
1156
1157
1152
1145
1125
1124
1133
1120
1140
VAN
MO, PPM
3* 02
1012
1003
1106
1055
1030
1055
1064
1066
1065
1050
VAN
NO
LB/M1TV
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
VAN
NO
LB/MBTU
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
CEM
*O2
pR¥
8.1
7.3
8.1
7.3
8.1
8.1
8,1
8.1
7.9
CEM
XO2
DRY
6.1
6.1
6.5
6.5
6.3
CEM
no.p»i$
DRY
855
848
833
805
855
900
809
855
845
CEM
NO. PPM
3X O2
93S
935
961
921
938
cfW
NO
LB/MBTU
1.2
1.2
1.2
1,2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
CEM
fiO
LB/MBTU
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.3
-------
CUMBERLAND UNIT 2
UNIT 2
6/29/69
TIME
PERIOD
945-1000
1000-1015
1015-1030
1100-1115
1115-1130
1245-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
1415-1430
1430-1445
1445-1500
1500-1515
1515-1530
(530-1545
AS/TRACES
LOAD
1285
1290
1294
1292
1292
1294
1293
1298
1294
1298
1309
1302
1293
1293
1293
1281
1295
BOILER
02
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.1
4.1
3.7
3.6
3.4
3.6
3.4
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.2
4.7
4.0
VAN
*0?
PPY
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.4
6.3
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.5
6.0
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.6
6.1
VAN
NO. PPM
3X O2
1021
1003
972
1052
1019
989
1011
1009
996
989
1014
1016
1004
995
987
980
100S
VAN
NO
LB/MBT'J
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1 .4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
CEM
X02
DRY
6.7
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.5
6.5
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.5
CEM
NO . PPM
3* O2
894
921
921
902
941
941
902
902
902
1001
974
974
934
934
934
932
CEtfl
NO
LB/MBTU
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.5
1 .4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
CONCLUSIONS:
The conclusions from the NOx testing are as follows:
1. CEM and Van correlated well for Unit Z; however, CEM reads appro
imately 0.5 Ib/mbtu lower than the Van for Unit 1.
2. At reduced load (124t> MW) on Unit 2. NOx emissions were slightly
higher than at full load. This is probably due to the higher boiler
levels at reduced load.
3. At reduced load (1015 MW) on Unit 1, NOx emissions were high.
Again, this is probably due to the extremely high.boiler O2 levels.
4. Reducing boiler 02 on Unit 2 from 4.4 to 3.6 k showed slight
reduction of NOx. However, on a unit of this size with so many other
operational factors to be considered, it may be difficult to see a
significant reduction in NOx when boiler 02 is reduced.
64
-------
GALLATIN UNIT 1
RESULTS
UNIT 1
7/12/89
TIME
(1)
LOAD
(2)
BOILER
(3)
VAN
(4)
VAN
(5)
VAN
(6)
(7)
GEM
(8)
GEM
PERIOD
0845-0900
0900-0915
0915-0930
1015-1030
1030-1045
1045-1100
1100-1115
1115-1130
1130-1145
1145-1200
1200-1215
X3.15
\1OO-
1315
1330-
1345-
1400-
141S<
1430
1300
1315
1330
1345
1400
1415
1430
1445
2200-2215
2215-2230
2230-2245
2245-2300
2300-2315
2315-2330
_Q2
*O2 NO.
NO
XO2 NO. PPM NO
DRY 3% 02 LB/MBTU DRY 3* O2 LS/MBTU
262 3.0
7.4 244
7.4 240
7.1 227
263
262
262
262
262
263
263
263
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.1
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.0
231
240
248
239
236
233
231
228
262 :
262 :
263 ;
262 :
262 :
262 :
262 :
262 :
152
149
148
149
ISO
151
J.o
2.8
Z.7
2.4
1.3
2.3
2.7
J.2
.2
.1
.9
.0
.2
.1
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.7
7.0
7.2
7.2
232
226
222
216
222
226
230
227
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.2
254
250
245
251
250
252
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.36
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.32
0.32
0.33
0.32
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.36
0.36
0.36
5.7 304
5.5 263
5.5 263
5.6 258
5.6 252
5.6 252
5.6 246
5.6 246
5.6 258
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.6
7.1
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
251
250
250
247
19?
197
217
264
237
235
233
231
232
229
0.43
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
a.35
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 min. from control board.
(2) Average boiler O2 from superheat and reheat furnaces, recorded
every IS min. from control board.
(3) VAN measurement of k O2 on a dry basis; 15-sec. readings averaged
over a 15 min. period.
<4> VAN measurement of NO, ppm, corrected to 3k 02; 15-sec. readings
averaged over a 15 min. period.
(5) Emission rate, NO, Ib/mBTU, calculated from VAN NO measurements
and VAN X02.
(fp) CEM measurement of k O2 on a dry basis, read on a 15-min. basis
from strip chart in control room.
(*7> CEM measurement of NO, ppm. corrected to 3k O2, read on a 15-min.
basis from strip chart in control room.
<8) Emission rate, NO. Ib/mBTU, calculated from CEM NO and CEM *02.
65
-------
GALLATIN UNIT 1
07-31-1910
Gallatin Unit 1, b Duct,
"260 MV
(1) (21 (31 (41 O) (SI 17)
Tin LOW BOILER S02 02 CO C02 BO
(«l
10
19»
MO
HV 02 po«,, dry basis, IS M
ovtr a 15 •!•. period.
(0} iu •eaiozeaeat of HO, pn» corrected to 3%
readings averafed over a 15 ado. period.
(91 Mssioo nte, M, Ib/aOTV, alealated troa
tad Vtf v>2.
e. raadiaqi areuoed
raadlaos awaoed
c. taadlBp •verapd
02, ISftc.
V1K 10 seutieaeots
66
-------
GALLATIN UNIT 2
08-01-1)90 J8010810
Callatin Unit 2, b Duct, "25$ KV
(1) (2)
tlMB LOAD BOILER
0815-0830
0130-0145
0045-0900
0900-0914
Iff
255
255
255
2S4
m
502
— — --TJI
(4)
02
(M
CO
02 ppa,dcy %,4ry pw,dzy
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
1741
1772
1774
17(7
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.5
11
19
19
19
CO
C02
(7)
MO
%,uv poa.ocy 9
13.56
13.7C
13.14
13. $5
353
35«
3*7
3(1
(II
•0
no2 ;
40V
414
423
42(
MO
LO/BDtU
0.51
0.59
o.to
O.(l
unit load recorded every 15 all. froa control board.
(2) Boiler 02, recorded every 15 Bin. from
control board.
(3) ton wuBrtwDt of dict.W2, dry buii, 15 fee. readlnqs tvertqed
over a 15 lio. period.
(4) Van •ttaareaent of daet 02, dry bui«r 15 sec. XMdiaojB averaged
ever a 15 Bin. period.
(5) vaa aecsareaeBt of 00, ppm, dry bafia, IS MC. readings averaojed
over a 15 Bin. period.
(6) fan aeasoreaut of 002, % dry basis, 15 sec. raadiaoji averaqed
over a 15 Bin. period.
(7) fan BeasoreBent of W, ppa, dry taslf, 15 sec. teadiap aveziqeA
over a 15 Bin. period.
(I) faa Beasveaent of W), BPB, corrected to 3% 02, 15 sec.
readlnp avenojed over a IS ala. period.
(9) •aisfllon rate, §0, Ib/BBW, calcalated iioa VIM so BeasareBeats
and VAI v>2.
67
-------
GALLATIN UNIT 3
08-01-1990 10010958
Galiatin Unit 3, t> Duct, "255 NV
(1) (2)
T1MB LOM» BOILER
PERIOD
1000-1015
1015-1030
1030-1045
1045-1100
m
255
2(0
252
254
(3)
602
------- wa
(4)
02
n
<*>
00
02 ppMry %,dry ppa,dry
3.8
4.0
4.1
4.0
1(32
1(59
1(39
1(52
(.0
(.0
(.1
(.0
21
127
23
2(
(O
002
(7)
HO
l,dry PPBfdry f
12.99
13.13
12.85
12.94
341
339
343
340
<8>
10
(9)
NO
3% 02 Ift/iOto
417
405
413
408
0.59
0.58
0.59
0.51
(V> Unit load recorded every 15 sin. izw control board.
P) Bailee 02, recorded every 15 tin. from
coetrel board.
(3) vat scasorestBt of duct 502, dry basis, IS sec. readlaej awrwed
over a IS alo. period.
(4) Vaa MasiireacBt of doct 02, dry basis, IS sec. xeadlM* averaged
over a IS tin. period.
(5) waa snsireseat of 00, p<», dry basis, IS sec. zeadiitqs avecapd
over a IS aid. period.
(() faa SMsareseat of 002, % dry basis, IS sec. readiios averaged
over a 15 mlo. period.
(7) laa •easnresBBt of M, ppm, dry basis, IS sec. readiaqs avezaqed
over a IS sin. period.
(I) fan •easoreseot of §0, ppei, corrected to 3% 02, IS sec.
read too* averaged over a 15 tin. period.
(9) toissioa rite, 10, lb/bm, calculated froa VU BO •eaiirueitx
and Til U2.
68
-------
JOHN SEV|ER UNIT 2
W-11-1190
JCHS SEWER m" ! SL'PEKHEAT -JIPT ~tf ;
TIBS
0520-0630
C33Q-034S
OS45-WW-
0300-0115
10-17-1 9%
JSHK mm
1018-1030
1030- IMS
1045-1100
1100-1115
(1)
LOU
MS
200
200
205
200_
C2J (
BOILER S
02 pps
2.60
2.10
2.60
2.60
mil i IEHEAT rumicE
200
197
19S
193
2.55
2.55
2.55
2.60 '
S)
?.i
**-*.
,try
%3
1020
1030
1028
TEST
1073
11S7
1165
1161
'4/
22
!,iry
5,72
5.37
S.S!
5.32
2
4.9B
3.71
3.S1
3.44
(5)
CO
??a,*y
20
22
22
22
42
58
32
32
<£) (7) #:•
CCt HE SC
Z,iry ??*,:.•/ 6 31 02
13.02 3S7 432
13.02 391 4S8
13.02 369 4K
13.02 3BE 463
15.72 291 327
.13.72 105 31B
15.72 324 334
15.72 325 333
(!)
m
Ib/iiiU
O.S3
0.57
0.6E
O.tfi
C.47
0.45
6.47
C.4J
(1) Unit loi( rEt'.ried every IS ain. f;oa control boari.
(2) Avtrajt t&iltr 02, recorded every IS nn. froi
contro! bDar;!.
(3) Van itasiirBunt si duct S32, Jrf buis, IS sec. reidings
O'/fr i 15 ain. period.
(4) Van leisurefier.i »f duct "2, dry basis, 15 sec. readings ivsrigert
over a 15 1:0. period.
'5) Van atascreaent o( IX, ppi, dry basis, 15 SEC. readings averaged
. over a IS lift, period.
'£) Vac, ifiisuieaeni sf CC2, I dry basts, 15 sec. readings averaged
ovir a 15 sir., cerioc.
f) Van itisuriiEn$ of KS, jps, dry sasis, 15 sec. readings
over i 15 sir,, period.
(I) Van isisurtatni of NO, jpt, corrected tc 3! 02, 15 sec.
readings jve-aged over a IS iin. period.
(9) £ai55i
-------
JOHN SEVER UNIT 3
10-li-lSIO
JIM SEVIER L'SI? 3 SUPER HBTIfi WCT TEST 3
TIME
1145-1200
!2CtK2;5
1215-1230
1230-1240
10-11-1390
JOHN SEVIER
1300-1315
1315-1330
1330-1340
(1)
LOW
VI
200
200
200
200
(2?
BOILER
22 n
3.25
3.20
3.15
3.05
(3)
102
5if Irs? 1
1172
1167
1032
1101
(43
02
itt>- PI
4.91
4.92
4.9§
4.10
(5)
CC
iMn?
22
23
22
22
(6)
CI2
Mfy ?
!3.%
la.98
12.S2
12.37
(T, m
NO NC
SMC* i 31 S2 1
4£1 SIB
4£1 516
44S SO?
447 SO
'?)
S2
.w«v-
0.74
:.73
0.71
J.Ti
OKI! 3 KHEftT FURNACE TEST 4
200
260
200
3.25
3,15
3.2§_
llil
1125
1118
7.46
7,42
7.47
19
11
IS
11.60
.n.tt
11.55
343 45&
34S 4&1
349 464
C.65
O.K
o.ei.
(1) Unit load recorded every IS tin, froi control board.
(2) Average boilif 02, recorded every 15 tin. froi
control boird.
(3) Van leisurfaent of duct S02, dry :asis, 15 sec. readings averagta
over a 15 iin. p«n
-------
JOHN SEVIER UNIT 4
10-11-1990
JOHN SEVIER UNIT 4 SUPER HEATER 31JCT TEST 1
Tins
0730-0745
0745-0809
0800-OB15
0815-0330
!0-i;-I590
JOHN SEVIER
0900-0915
0915-0930
0930-0945
0945-1000
(11
LOAD
rtw
260
200
20C
2Q£
UNIT 4
200
200
200
200
•;r.
BOILER
02
2.95
2.95
3.30
3.05
REHEAT DUCT
3.05
3.3C
3.35
3.25
(31
S02
ppa, Cry
1023
!015
1017
:ois
TEST 2
1249
1243
1243
1253
(4)
02
I,dry
5. BO
•5.60
5.78
5.30
5.34
5.22
5.30
5.24
<5> (6) m (8) W)
CD C02 KG NO NO
22
21
12,4
12.2
12.2
12.3
21 12.73
22 12.B7
21 12.84
22 12.92
374
377
378
377
392
395
392
396
437
44£
447
447
4SO
449
453
0.62
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
(!) Unit load recorded every IS "in. froi control board.
• 2) Average boUer 02, recorded every 15 sin. Iroc
control boiru.
C3) Van leasuresent of duct SC2, dry basis, IS sec. readings avenged
over a IS ein. period.
(4) Van leasureisnt of duct 32, dry basis, 15 sec. readies averaged
over i S5 nn. period.
(5) Van ieasureoent of CD, ppa, dry basis, 15 sec. rEiiir.gs averajed
o^er a 15 sir,, perioii.
'£} Van teasuriier.t of C02, Z try biiis, 15 se:. reafiirgs avenged
over a 25 lin. period.
(7) Van leasureeent of NO, ops, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 ein. period.
(3) Van leasurement af KB, ppi, corrected to 3! 02, 15 sec.
readings averaged over a 15 iin. period.
(9) Eaission rate, NO, Ih/iBTU, calculated (roi VAH K3 aeuureaents
and VAN 102.
71
-------
•JOHNSONVILLE UNIT
;3-;!iSOMVk.i $l~ 1 PREOIPITATOR OUTLET ttf,f,0lt DuCT (Ufc *QA3)
.„__, ... -van — .
"fl ,-Ctii BOILER S02 C2 CC C3i KG
r.k1 32 3pe,cry !.:ry zps.cry l,:r>- ppa.cry
03:0-0330 45,00 6.9 85* 9,65 22,2 3.:2 229
3B3C-QS45 4J.OO 6,9 894 5.64 22.6 9.BS ?4;
45.00 6.9 f!4 9,61 23.2 9.K 24!
09CO-C915 45.00 i.9 909 S.63 22.1 9, SO 245
09J5-0930 45.00 7.0 914 9,54 23.S 9.93 24!
0930-0945 45.00 7.2 902 9.64 22.4 9.8: 239
094S-10CO 45.00 7.2 878 9.87 21.3 9.55 221
1000-1015 45.00 7,2 872 9.91 21.3 .9.49 214
1015-1030 45.00 6.9 857 10.03 21.0 9.30 209
1030-1045 45.00 6.9 849 10.03 23.0 9.23 199
JMM110 45.00 6.9 831 10.25 62.7 9.01 203
(8)
s: ??*<
1 21 C2
27S
38:
331
387
379
379
358
347
344
326
340
AVERASI 45.00 7.0 879 9.80 26.1 9.E3 227 364
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 sin. fros control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 lin. froa
control board.
(3) Van eeasuretent of duct SC2, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
C4) Van leasureeent of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 ain. period,
(5) Van Hasureient of 01, ppa, dry basil, 15 we, readings averaged
over a 15 ain. period.
ffi) Vai teasureaent of CC2, I dry basis, IS sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(7) Van eeasurennt of NO, ppt, dry basis, 15 fee. readings averaged
over a I' air. period.
(8! Van eeasureient of NO, ppi, corrected to 31 02, 15 sec.
readings averaged over a IS tin. period.
(9) Eiissioa rate, KC, Ib/iiTU (actual), calculated froi VAN NO eeasurnents,
CO) EBissien rite, §02, Ib/fBTU, calculated fro* VAN SQ2 aeisunaents.
(11! Van leasireaen; of 102, Ih/atitu, corrected to 31 02, 15 sec.
riadinfs averaged over a IS ain. period.
(9)
KC
0,22
0,52
0.12
0,53
0.52
0.52
0.49
0.48
0.47
9.45
0.47
0.50
CO? (11)
Cr-*. c-*,-* - I
««M*» Jrf*. Wv
;3/«Stu 1 35! 32
2.5S 4,:u
i.?£- 4.25
2,7fi 4,35
2.75 4.35
2.74 ' 4,30
2.73 4.32
2.71 4.39
2.70 4.39
2.69 4.41
2.66 4.36
2.66 4.4S
2.10 4.34
72
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 1
US1T 1 PRECIPITOUS OUTLET COWOK 3UCT (Kifif.-LOAt)
THW
06-i:-l991 ('.) (2) (2) U; (5) (6) (7) (E
T:«,E :2A5 BQ!L£S S02 C2 CC C32 JiD 113 f
M D2 Fpircry I.rry pj«,sry I.cry p?.,cry (21
12C4--21E 1* 4.3 1082 6.9C 21.'- 11.75 3.U
1215-1230 14 4.3 !0$3 6.76 29.1 H.B1 293
1215-1230 :4 4.3 1084 £.8: 28.2 11.76 29S
1245-1300 114 4.2 ICBb t.64 20.8 11.73 303
1300-1315 114 .3 1077 £.85 26.5 11.71 300
1315-1330 114 .2 1079 6.79 28.2 11.80 295
•.230-1345 114 .2 1081 £.78 31.4 11.87 295
1345-1400 114 .2 1083 6.76 30.4 21.91 296
1400-1415 115 .0 1078 6.76 28,0 11.97 298
1415-1430 115 .0 1062 £.77 38.1 11.98 294
1430-1445 114 .1 1075 £.78 34.9 12.02 298
1445-1500 J!4 .1 1070 £.76 45.1 11.99 299
AVERSE 114 4.2 1081 £.80 31,2 11.86 298
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 tin. frot control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every IS ain. froi
control board.
(3) Van eeasureient of duct SQ2, dry basis, 15 set. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(4) Van •easureient of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(5) Van leasureaent of CO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
<6> Van eeasureaent of CD2, 1 dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(7) Van aeasureunt of KO, ppi, dry basis, IS sec. readings averaged
over i 15 §in. period.
(8) Van leasurennt of NO, ppi, corrected to 31 02, 15 sec.
readings averaged over a 15 iin. period.
(9! Eaissicn rate, NO, Ita/iBTU (actual), calculated froi VAN NO leasureaents.
(10) Eiission rate, S02, Ib/iBTL, calculated froi VAN 502 leasureients,
(11) Van aeasureient of S02, li/tatu, corrected to 31 02, 15 we.
readings averaged over 4 15 ain. period.
>
PS
C2
2%
371
360
3B5
382
374
373
375
376
372
377
378
378
(S)
xc
,3/Miu
C.54
3.51
0.52
0.53
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.52
0.51
0.52
0.52
0.52
CO?
5C2
;b/c:tu
2.63
2,64
1.61
2.S3
2.61
2.61
2.61
2.61
2.60
2.61
2.59
2.58
2.61
CD
SC2 .E
* 31 02
2.36
2.2*
3.22
3.35
3.32
3.30
3.30
3.30
3.29
3.30
3.28
3.26
3.31
73
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 2
04-10-1m
14UKIH26
J'Villi Unit 2 ESP Out lit Hiqh Lori
TINE
0930-0945
0945-1000
1000-1004
1115-1130
1130-1145
1145-1200
1200-1215
1221-1230
1230-1245
1245-1300
l»p-BW
1333-1349
1345-1400
1400-1413
1520-1930
1930-1949
1545-1600
1600-161S
J'Villt Ikit
2134*2145
2149-2200
2200-2215
2215-2230
(1)
LOAD
m
*I26
M26
•126
127
127
127
127
127
127
127
128
121
122
123
122
122
m
122
2ESP
49
45
49
49
(2)
BOILER
02
3.10
3.10
3.20
2.80
3.00
2.60
3.30
3.37
4.60
4.70
4,39
4.40
4.40
4.30
9.10
fetltt U
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.40
(3)
VAN 02
I dry
7.39
7.39
7.53
7.79
7.12
7.82
. 7.74
7.67
7.71
7.71
7.83
1.90
8.77
8.56
8.10
8.08
8.13
8,02
W LM4
12.13
12.90
tt.92
12.91
(4)
CO
Widry
631
673
527
626
510
988
713
866
838
821
673
305
166
163
108
131
234
444
19
20
21
19
(5)
C02
I dry
11.14
11.16
11.06
10.86
10.97
10.98
10.58
10.61
10.81
11.25
11.17
11.12
11.20
11.19
11,02
11.89
11.14
11.00
7.16
7.13
7.14
7.13
(6)
NO
f PI Wt M
201
199
180
329
342
340
334
161
164
199
159
174
174
171
183
178
168
167
251
247
246
290
in
NO
>• dry
216
214
194
354
361
366
359
234
239
231
233
187
187
184
197
191
111
180
270
269
265
261
(8)
Nil
dry 31
286
283
25B
483
502
500
487
317
324
314
319
269
276
266
274
266
293
249
994
990
590
997
(9)
Ml
10/MtU I
0.41
0.40
0.37
0.69
0.72
0.72
0.70
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.39
0.40
0.38
0.39
O.tt
0.36
8.3L
0.88
O.H
O.N
f.89
02
dry
.50
.50
,50
.50
.40
.40
.50
.43
6.40
6.50
6.60
6.50
6.50
6.60
6.60
6.80
6.80
7.20
7.20
KLAN)
ttfl
$02
m i
920
920
920
920
920
920
900
907
910
910
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
910
m
i/noru
2.69
2.60
2.50
2.50
2.54
2.50
2.M
2.53
2.50
2.40
2.40
2.40
2.40
2.50
2.70
2.70
2.50
2.50
74
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 2
04-11 -mO SWWAkY
J'Villt Unit 2 Kiffe Lcid (Ht«ti Prntura Haittn
TIK
OS29-0845
0845-0900
0900-0913
0913-0930
0930-0133
(1)
IQAfl
m
112
112
112
112
112
(2)
Niltt
02
3.00
3.30
3.30
3.10
3.10
(3)
02
I dry
7.36
7.4B
7.37
7.39
7.6S
(4)
CO
IN dry
487
421
367
434
437
(3)
C02
1 dry
11.72
11.66
11.61
11.36
11.90
(6)
M
lia wtt
162
162
163
t63
163
(71
M
PDI dry
174
174
177
177
177
(tt)
W
dry 31
22)
232
237
231
rw
(9)
•1
Ib/aotu
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.34
0.34
02
1ITY
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
.
S02 $02
mi IK/HUTU
960 2.70
%0 2.70
960 2.70
960 2.70
960 2.70
(1) (hit iMl rKorM ewy IS •!•. (roi control totrd.
(2) Amaii beiltr 02, rocorM mrr 19 ii«. fr«t
CMtrol loird.
(3) VM MiMTNtnt of Met 02, dry bitis, 13 we. rfftliitf ama|H
•m a 13 ii«. ttriod. (Mtl cnn)
(4) VM MiwrHMt »f CO, ppti try Ittit, IS MC. rudiift awnH
ovtr a 13 til. ftriri.
(3) Vu WMVNMt of C02| ••«« dry feasit, IS MC. rniiait avtraftd
ovfr a 13 ail. ttrio4.
(6) VM MtMfMMt ol H, Mt, Mt kail i, IS MC. rtaliiff avtra|M
ovtr a 13 ma. aariod.
(7) VM Mawraant af H, an* dry bant, IS MC. raadian avtrtttd
ottr a IS aia. aariod.
(9) VM aaaMraaaat at H, Ma, corrtctad to 31 02, IS MC.
raadiaft avaraaad «ftr a IS aia. aariM.
(9) EaiiiiM rata, Ml, 11/alTU, calnlatad froa VM tt aaawraaaRti
and VM 102.
•* Mwaad aoittara contiat • 71
75
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 3
U jMT 3 ?SEe:?":A:0? D^LET CBREfc DUCT -.sifih LOAtr)
C£-:;-;99: o <:; (3) (4) C5> (5) (7)
TIKE LOAD BC1LER SC2 C2 CC C22 KC
KM 02 PP«|dry l.cry ppa.cry t,dry ppa,dry
1300-1315 *121 5.6 'l066 7.26 63.8 11.70 262
1315-1330 122 5.6 1066 7.28 51.7 11.67 269
'330-1345 122 5.6 . 1068 7.24 54.5 11.7B 266
1345-1400 122 5.6 1074 7.24 50.6 11.90 269
1400-1415 121 5.6 1071 7.25 47.2 11.97 26B
1415-1430 121 5.6 " 1069 7.20 73.9 12.08 267
1430-1445 122 5.4 1069 7.22 49.3 12.07 268
1445-150C 122 5.6 1066 7.21 42.0 12.03 277
:500-1515 122 5.6 1075 7.20 25.6 12.06 313
1515-1530 123 5.6 1066 7.26 25.1 12.06 305
1530-1545 121 5.6 1076 7.23 25.2 12. 11 296
1545-1600 121 5.6 1075 7.15 32.7 12.24 298
AVERAGE 122 5.6 1070 7.23 4S.1 11.97 280
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 tin. 1roi control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 iin. frot
control board.
(3} Van teasureient of duct S02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a IS e-in. period.
(4) Van wasuretent of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(5) Van •easure«Rt of CO, ppa, dry basis, 15 cec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(6) Van ceasureient of C02, I dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
<7) Van eeasuretent of ND, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 «in. period.
(6) Van eeasureient of ND, ppi, corrected to 31 02, 15 sec.
readings averaged over a IS lin. period.
(B)
SO PPf!
« 31 02
343
352
34B
3*2
3S1
348
350
362
409
400
388
387
366
!S)
NC
Ib/iatu
0.47
0.48
0.4B
0.46
0.4B
0.48
0.48
0.50
0.56
0.55
0.53
0.53
0.50
CO)
SC2
Ib/tttu
2.66
2.67
2.66
2.68
2.67
2.66
2.66
2.65
2.67
2.67
2.68
2.66
2.67
;::)
SC2 LB
* 31 31
3.49
3.50
3.4G
3.51
3.50
3.47
3.4S
3.46
3.49
3.50
3.51
• 3.46
3.49
(9) Emission rate, NO, la/iBTL' (actual), calculated free VAN ffi ceasureeents.
CO) Ei j ssi on rate, 502, Ib/iBTU, calculated frot VAN SCI' ieasureoents,
CD Van aeasaree-ent of SC2, Ib/ibtu, corrected to 3Z C2, \l sec.
readings averaged over a 15 ein. period.
76
-------
JOHNSONV1LLE UNIT 3
JOHWDNVIUE JXIT 3 PRECIPITATE* GIJ7LE7 COttSSi Si-CT (LCii _
%-:M9?: CD (2) (3) <«) «) <£> (7) ce)
T;*E .CAD BOIIES £02 C2 CO C22 SC KG PPf,
r.H 22 ppi,dry I, fry pjircry Z,dry s;fc,cry * 3! 02 ]
C'845-^Oe 4£ >:0 702 11.51 17.0 8.07 255 490
0900-0915 46 >:0 735 J1.6C 17.7 B.07 2!E iB9
C915-OS3C 46 >!0 737 11.63 18.3 8,01 255 490
0930-0945 46 MO 737 11.57 18.3 8.04 256 489
0945-1000 47 MO • 738 11.55 18.2 8.07 257 489
1000-1015 47 MO 740 11.54 18.4 B.06 255 485
1015-1030 47 MO 740 11.49 16.2 8.10 259 491
1030-1045 47 MO 729 11.50 18.4 8.08 263 498
1045-1100 47 MO 722 11.48 18.3 8.12 263 498
1100-1115 47 MO 721 11.50 18.5 8.10 260 492
1115-1130 48 MO 72B 11.42 18.5 8.19 265 499
1130-1145 48 MO 725 11.37 18.6 8.26 260 485
AVERAGE 47 MO 729 11.52 18.2 8.10 259 491
(1) .Unit load recorded every IS lin. froi control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 iin. froi
control board.
(3) Van leasureient of duct SD2, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. peric'.
(4) Van leasureient of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(5) Van teasureient of CD, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(£) Van msureient of C02, 1 dry basis, 15 sec. readings aver aged
over a 15 tin. period.
(7) Van leasureient of NO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 airs, period.
(B) Van msureient of NO, ppi, corrected to 31 22, 15 sec.
reacings average: over a 15 iin. period.
(9) Eiissicn rate, NO, Ib/iBTI! (actual), calculated froi VAN NO teasureients.
(10) Eiission rate, 502, Ib/iBTU, calculated froi VAK S32 leasureaer.ts.
(Ill Van aeasureieni of 532, lh/iitu, corrected to 31 D2, 15 sec.
reatJincs iveragec over a 15 tin. period.
<9) (10)
NO £22 S:
b/tatu la/iotu «
0.67 .2.58
0.57 2. 69
0,67 2.71
0.67 2.69
0.67 2.69
0.67 2.69
0.68 2.68
0.68 2.64
0.69 2.61
0.68 2.61
0.69 2.62
0.67 2.59
0.6E 2.tt
(11)
32 a
<96
5. 16
5.20
5.14
5.12
5.13
5.08
5.01
4.93
4.95
4.92
4.84
5.04
77
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 4
:;R«I2,W!Lll -'BIT 4 PSECIPITUTOR BL'TLE! 3'JCT
C5-20-U31
TIHE
07<£-3BCf
OSCC!-CE!S
OS15-OI30 .
&B30-38?*
0845-OSCC
0900-03:5
09',5-OT30
0330-W45
{:> 0
13AB BOILER
,%• ci
45 «
«5 »
/ C £
45 «
-45 *
45 «
45 *
45 •
C3} '.'
502 CK
ppt,dry I,i
68; i
7*5 :
lit I
770 1
763 1
751 1
76: i
756 1
> w .•
! CO
ry a?c,cr
.so :s.
,44 2
^
i
A
4
3
(£1
CQ2
Vr>-
B.14
E.2S
i.2'5
B.27
§."l^
*&&
1.28
S.25
B.23
•;/)
KG
:?o,dry
2C7
213
21S
220
21S
220
220
• 222
(6)
«J PPR
1 3i C2
372
413
405
411
422
415
411
418
32 22, I; sec.
rejcir.gs averaged over a IS fin. pence.
(9) iiission rite, «, Ib/tffL' (actual), calculated froi VAN \'3 iiHureunts.
(10) Emission rate, SQ2, lb/iB?U, caiculateii frot VAK SD2 leisurtMnts.
{•) B«3 2ATA
78
-------
JOHNSONVIUE UNIT S
06-1M991
»**£
C'73C:-0745
OI45-C6CC'
0300-3215
0815-0130
0830-08*5
0145-0900
0900-5515
0915-0930
(t)
LOAD
»k
44
£4
it.
44
44
44
44
44
(2>
BC1LI3
02
i
*
*
*
*
•
i
i
O)
SD2
5pa,d-y
652
7SS
724
732
73J
740
738
736
(4)
C2
*:C'>
ic.s:
11.2?*
11.32
11.34
11.34
11.2£
11.24
1 * "*«
A* »A*
Vftn" ""
C5)
""
;•:•£, c'y
22.2
22.2
•"*A *
*.*.• ^
22.5
22.5
22.4
22.5
23.2
(61
*ff-L
Vhi«
i.ery
8.39
S.64
S.60
B.Sfi
8.9
8.59
6.59
8.55
m
so
ppi.dry
25C
"257
255
253
250
249
248
248
(8J
SC rf rt
f 31 82
447
476
475
471
466
461
4SB
455
C9!
NC
;5/«Dta ;
o.e:
O.S5
0.65
C.65
C.E«
0.63
0.63
0.63
(10)
K2
e/e=tt
^i i*
4.bNI
2,50
2.51
2.61
2,62
2. £2
2.60
2.59
44
720 11.24. 22.62
8.56
251
414
0,64
2.54
(t) Unit load recorded every 15 lin. free control loard.
(2) Averap boiler 02, recorced every 15 tia, free
control boird,
(3) Van •easureient of duct S02, dry aasis, 15 tec. readings averaged
over a 15 itn. period.
(4) Van aeasureient of duct 02, dry basis, 15 HC. readings averaged
over a 15 iin, period.
(5) Van nasureiint of CO, ppi, dry oasis, 15 sic. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(£} Van ieasureie.it of C02, I dry basis, IS fit. readings averaged
over a II iin. period.
(71 Van •easuretent ef M), ?pi, cry easis, 15 we. readings averaged
over i 15 tin, period.
(8) Van leasureient of X3, ppa, corrected tc 31 02, 15 sec.
readings averaged over a 15 r.n. perioi.
(S) Eiission rate, NO, Ib/iBTU tactual), calculated fro* VAN NO teasurnents.
(10) Eaiition rate, S02, Is/aBTL, calculated frca VAX SQ2 uasureients.
«*) 8M BATA
79
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 5
06-18-1991 (U (2) (3) (4) (5) (6). (7) (8)
::« '.'M E"::n 502 32 CD CC2 sic NC ft:
R!i :•! :?£,try I.cry ppfi,cry J,c'ry ppi.e'ry § 3i 12
::3C'-r.:5 i" * ::E; 7.04 <30.< .7$ 195 :s:
* « •* f * f ^0 ' f>C 4 « * n » *r n« ^DT D ft7 **flit ^£ 5
::20-:;« '.OL * :::: 7.2; 390.£ .s? 20* 27D
:1«-1200 1C5 1115 7.22 3BC.5 .93 207 272
1200-121S 105 1125 7.31 431.9 1 .89 206 271
;2!5-1230 105 K21 7.29 423.2 1 .90 206 273
1230-1245 105 . 11 10 7.33 400.9 11.89 210 276
1245-1300 105 1107 7.27 423.2 11.93 209 274
AVERA3E 105 « 1110 7.27 408.6 11.92 205 269
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 tin. froi control board.
<2) Average boiler D2, recorder1 every 15 iin. froi
control board.
(3) Van ceasureient cf duct SD2, dry aasis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 lin. period.
(4) Van nasureaent of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(5) Van leasureient of CO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
•(6) Van leasureient of C02, Z dry basis, 15 see. readings averaged
over a 15 lin. period.
(7) Van leasureient of NO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(B) Van leasureient of NO, ppi, corrected to 32 02, IS sec.
readings averaged over a 15 tin. period.
(9} Eli ssi 01 rate, KC, Ib/iBTU tactual), calculated froi VAN NO leasureients.
(1C: En ssi on rate, S32, ii/iBTU, calculated froi VAN S02 aeasureaents.
(9) (10)
SO 502
Ib/cbiu ib/Htu
C.34 2.59
0.37 2.E2
C.37 2.BC
0.37 2.e:
0.37 2.E2
0.37 2.B1
0.38 2.79
0.38 2.77
0.37 2.7B
(»} BAD DATA
80
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 6
OUTLET C3MDH JK1C
06-17-199;
"IXE
,t.p,..,,.
1*30-1445
14*5-1500
1500-1515
1732-17*5
1745-1BOO
1600-1B15
1B15-3E30
(!) (2)
^2AD 5SIL.E
Mi 02
• * £ c
• •c r
< ifi c
* 7fl ^
US 4
120 4
120 4
220 4
s
,4
.<
,i
.]
,9
.9
.9
.9
(3)
S02
pp«,cry
1129
1158
li£5
1176
1164
1193
1201
1208
(4)
22
Z.cry
S.9B
7.01
£.96
6.94
£.95
£.97
£.95
6.94
•VM"
(5)
CD
p?i,cry I
(S.2
49.8
50. C
bO.t
79.7
69.0
85.9 1
9B.7
6)
:G2
dry
2. IE
2.02
1.98
1.99
2.50
2.56
2.57
12.53
(7)
SO
pps.cry
269
266
27;
277
2£7
270
269
270
(8)
SO ?5r:
« 31 OS
•:• •
345
34 S
355
3*:
346
345
345
(9)
SO
:3/ci
C.
0.
c.
ft
Vm
C.
0.
0.
. 0.
t'J
i?
47
IE
4S
47
<7
^7.
47
(10)
EE2
;o/astu
' 2Jfc
2.E4
2.E5
2.B7
2.B4
2.92
2.93
2.95
AVERAGE
120
5.2 1174
6.96
72.7 12.30
270
346 0.48 2.87
(1) Un:t ;oac recorcec every 15 tin. frot control boird.
(2) Average boiler 02, recordec! every 15 tin. frot
control board.
<3) Vin leasureient of duct S02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaced
over t 15 lin. period.
(4) Vin uasureient of duct 92, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over » IS ain. period.
(5) Van leasureient of CD, ppi, dry basis, IS sec. readings averaged
over a 15 §in. period.
(6) Van msureient of CD2, I dry basis, IS set. readings averaged
over a 15 lin. period.
(7) Van leasurecent of NO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(8) Van feasureien; of NO, ppa, corrected to 31 02, IS sec.
readings averaged over a 15 i:n. period.
(9) Ems;on rate, NS, Ib/iBTL1 (actual), calculated froi VAN NO isasureients.
tiO) EnS5ion rate, SD2, 'iS/aBTU, calculated frot VM SD2 uasureients.
81
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 6
c 9pri"3*~iT«r. pin " rnip^nv n:*r*
Ci . ".fcV*- * r. j". L»* *.— - v^* 'iw* J*«v i
06-18-199: (1) (2) (3) <4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
i:»E LDA2 BDI.E3 EC2 C CC CD2 « «C ??,»
?IK C2 p?a,ery i,sry Spi>cry J,cry :?s,cry 1 21 02
C720-0750 48 5.t 892 6.«C ;£7.£ 11.2C 18;' 259
0730-0745 4B 5.6 922 8.27 :S5.2 ::.:• 175 247
C745-080C 43 r.t 982 c,24 19E.3 11. IS !7i 2*4
OSOO-OSl! 48 5.5 998 8.23 :70.3 11.21 175 247
0815-0830 48 5.5 1014 8.16 163.6 11.19 174 244
OB30-0845 48 5.5 1012 8.16 172.7 11.15. 173 243
0845-0900 48 5.5 1009 8.18 167.8 11.13 174 245
0900-C915 48 5.5 1006 8.22 162.0 11. 15 175 246
AVERA6E 48 5.5 979 8.23 177.6 11.18 175 247
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 ain. froi control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every 15 tin. froi
control boaro.
(3) Van msureient of duct S02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(4) Van nasureient of duct 02, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a IS iin. period,
(5) Van leasureient of CO, ppi, dry basis, IS sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period.
(6) Van leasureeent of CD2, Z dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 tin. period.
(7) Van ceasuretent of NO, ppi, dry basis, 15 sec. readings averaged
over a 15 iin. period,
(8? Van leasureient of NO, ppi, corrected to 31 02, 15 set.
readings averaged over a 15 nn, period.
(9) Eiission rate, NO, li/iBTL1 (actual), calculated froi VAN KO •easuruents.
(109 Eiission rate, 502, Ib/iBTU, calculated froi VAN S02 •eaturnents.
(9) (10)
SO 5D2
0.3£ 2.42
0.34 2.45
0.32 2.6i'
0.34 2.6E
C.33 2.71
0.33 2.71
0.34 2.70
0.34 2.70
0.34 2.63
82
-------
JOKXSOMYtUl UNIT 3 i UNIT I
JOHNSONVILLE UNITS 3 AND 7
(1) (2) C3) (41 (31 <6> (7)
TIKE LOAD SOILS SQ2 02 CO C02 KO
Wi 02 PpMry I, dry ppe,tiry I, dry ppa,dry 1
(8) (!)
NO m
n 02 lb/lbtu
"""""vim m
(10)
02 SOI
1 ppe
J'VILIE UMIT 3 ESP OUT
OHM-MIS
OilS-0130
0830-0845
0845-0900
0900-MIS
WIS-W30
46 •
48 »
49 *
S3 i
80 •
SO *
608 11.2 17 6.92
636 U.I 18 7.00
652 11.0 19 7.17
731 10.3 84 8.02
844 8.7 IBS 9.70
833 1.1 21 9,14
274
274
277
252 .
263
2S5
502
499
498
422
388
421
0.73
0,73
0.73
0.62
0.57
0.61
• •
9.6 750
• i
9.6 750
f t
7.9 960
WIT 7 ESP OUT
1600-1613
1615-1630
1630-1643
1645-1700
75 •
75 •
75 •
75 •
844 10.3 12 8.M
808 10.6 12 7.69
793 10.8 11 7.50
800 10.7 11 7.62
333
328
327
324
539
569
577
S63
O.fll
O.U
0.04
0.82
*
• e
i •
• t
, ,
(1) Unit load recorded every IS Bin. froe coatrol totrd.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded every IS til. froe
control board.
(3) V*B MiwrtMnt of duet S02, dry lull, 13 etc. rwdiogi tvertgrtf
over a 15 eio. period.
(4) VM •MHrMMt «f duct IS, tfry laili, 13 uc. rtiliip
-------
JOHNSONVILLE UNITS 8 AND 10
08-49-1990
J'Ville Unit G I UNIT 10
16090839
TIRE
J'VILLE UNIT
0845-0900
0900-0915
0915-0930
0930-0940
J'VILLE UNIT
JWS-BOO
1100-1115
1115-1130
1130-1145
1145-1200
(1) (2)
LOAD BOILER
m 02
B "130 IW
130 i
130 «
130 «
130 . i
10 135 KU
134 *
135 •
134 «
135 I
134 *
(3!
S02
ppi.dry
1000
1037
1048
1051
1108
1026
1031
1035
1032
.—..-- THIt. — , ,-...-.._-
(4) (5) (6) (7)
02 CO 02 NO
I, dry ppa,dry l.dry ppa.dry 1
7.f
7.7
7.1
7.6
6.9
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
22
23
23
26
t
166
36
36
36
37
10. B
10.9
11.1
11.1
12.3
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.3
513
520
520
524
463
529
533
S36
536
(8) (9)
NO NO
32 02 Ib/tbtu
694
703
701
703
573
709
709
708
707
0.99
1.01
l.M
1.01
0.12
1.02
1.01
1.01
1.01
(1) Doit load recorded every 15 tin. frM control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, mordtd tvtry IS «in. fret
control board.
(3) Vu ONfurcMDt of duct S02, dry basis, 15 MC. rttdiigi averaged
ovtr i IS tin. period.
(4) Vu ttasureMnt of duct 02, dry baiii, 15 MC. rndinis aftrtgid
ovtr a 15 lio. itriod.
(5) Vu tusDrtMat of CO, ipt, dry bails, 15 MC. r«adii|i avtraftd
owr a 15 lit. ptriod.
(6) Vat •Hturitmt of C02, i dry basis, 15 ttc. tHdinn mragid
ovtr a 15 iio. otriod.
(7) Vu MiwrHint of V), tpo, dry baiii, 15 MC. rtadlnis a«tra|td
ovtr * IS •!•. ptriod.
(B) Vu tMsorNtflt of NO, tpi, corrtcttd to 32 82, 15 MC.
readings amao,td over a 15 tin. pt^iod.
EiifiiM rite, NO, Ib/iITU, calcultttd fron VM 10 MIIC enti
and VMU2.
84
-------
JOHNSONViLLE UNIT 10
Johneonville Unit 1O ESP Outlet
(1) C2> <3> C4)
TIME LOAD BOILER VAN VAN VAN
MM X02 X02 NCXPFT1 NO
11/07/89 DRY 3XO2 Lfi/flBTU
1035-1050 120 3J 7.93 493 O.71
iOSO-llOS 121 3^ 8-04 9O4 O.72
1230-1249 122 3JO 7,92 994 Qy86
1313-1333 122-. • 2.7 7.67 664 O.96
133&-14O6 122 * 3JO 7^6 644 O.93
1427-1509 122 3.1 7v4O 694 O.94
1530-16OO 12O - 3^ 7.34 69O O.93
/tOO-1630 120 at 7.31 633 O.91
/t3(J-17O5 121 3S 7^O 603
204O-211O S3 7^4 lOdB4 ^ 934 O.78
2110-2140 56 6d6 1O.97 994 ObBO
2140-2146 90 64 11.19 999 O.87
219O-222O 98 7jt> •• 11U» 3OO
2220-2250 97 64 ^ 10^80 963
Averao* boiler O2, recorded every 30 «ln. f roe,
control board.
C3) Men eemmureeent of duct O2» dry bamim, 19 »ec. reading* averaged
over a 30 ein. period* Oaoet cavern)
Van eeamureeent of NO, pp% corrected to Wt Q2, 19 eec.
reading* averaged over a 90 ein. period.
Eeleeion rate* NO, Ib/^BTU, calculated froe VAN NO eeavureeent*
and VAN 1O2.
85
-------
KINGSTON UNIT 4
3/23/90 UNIT 4
<1 ) (2)
TIME
PEJUOD
1030-1045
1045-1100
1100-1115
1115-1130
1140-1145
1145-1200
1200-1215
AVERAGES
LOAD
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
14S
(4)
BOILEi
O2
4.2
4.2
4.2
3.9
3.9
4.1
4.5
4.1
(5)
VAN
*Q2
PRY
6.7
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
€.7
<
VAM
NO . ppm
3* O2
488
506
513
509
519
508
509
SO?
:6)
VAN
NO
laS/mB^u
0.70
0.72
0.73
0.73
0.74
0,73
0.73
0.73
VAN
CO. ppm
DHY
19.0
18.0
18,2
18.4
18.8
18.8
18.7
18. €
VAH
CO2 . *
pRJC
11 .65
11 .48
11 .62
11.60
11.71
11.58
11 .67
11.62
NOTES:
(1) Unit load, recorded every IS min. from control board.
(2) Boiler O2*. recorded every is min, from control board.
(3) VAN measurement of 02* on a dry basic; 15-sec. readings average
over a 15 join, period.
(4) VAN measurement of HO, ppm, corrected to 3* 02; 15-sec. reading
averaged over a 15 Bin. period.
(5) Emission rate, NO, Ib/mBtu, calculated from VAN NO measurements
and VAN k02.
(6) .Van measurement of CO, ppm, dry basic, 15*sec. readings average
over a 15-min. period.
(7) Van measurement of CO2, ppm, dry basis, 15-sec. readings averag
over a 15-mln. period.
CO analyzer out of service until 3/14/90. 09SO.
«« Assumed moisture content * 7%
86
-------
KINGSTON UNIT 5
3/13/90 UNIT 5
TIME
PERIOD
0815-0830
0830*0845
0845-0900
0900-0915
0915-0930
0930-0945
0945-1000
1000-1015
1030*1045
1045-1100
1100-1115
lllS'1130
1145-1200
1200-1215
1215-1230
1230-1245
AVERAGE
3/^4/fO
T1HE
PERIOD
0830-0845
0845-0900
0900-0915
0915-0930
0930-0945
0950-1000
1000-1015
1015-1030
1030-1045
1045-1300
(1>
LOAD
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
UNIT 5
LOAD
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
(2)
BOILER
02
3,2
2.9
2.9
2.9
2,9
2.9
2.9
3,0
2.7
2.9
3.2
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.9
BOILER
O2
3.0
2.8
3.0
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.0
(3>
VAN
X02
7.0
7,1
7.2
7.2
7,2
7,2
7.2
7,3
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
VAN
KQ2
UHY
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.3
(4)
VAN
NO.com
3* O2
429
429
431
430
428
429
424
431
431
433
434
436
442
435
434
434
432
VAN
NO .-DDTO
3ft 02
457
464
472
458
466
466
464
470
479
476
(5) (6)
VAN VAN
NO CO.DD1B
LB/mBlu DRY
0.6]
0.61
0.62
0.62
0.61
0,61
0.61
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
VAN VAN
NO CO.ppra
LB/nBtu DRY
0.65
0.60
0.68
0.66
0,67
0.67 16.5
0.66 19.9
0.67 18.4
0.69 17.5
0.68 17.6
(7)
VAN
C02. X
DRY
11 .84
12.15
11 .91
11.87
11 .89
11.77
11.82
11.63
11 .59
11.55
11 .73
, 11 .70
11 .58
11.64
11.69
11 .59
11.75
VAN
C02 . *
DRY
11.70
11.69
.11.49
11 .84
11.83
11 ,70
11.79
11 .75
11.82
11 .92
AVERAGES
200
3.9
7.3
467
0.66
18.0
11.75
§7
-------
PARADISE UNIT 3
MELimiMRV IfcSEUtt TEST PASMSISE UNIT 3
03-05-iSSI
TIKE
2018-2030
2030-2045
2045-2850
212S-214S
2145-2200
2200-2213
23W-23I3
2315-2330
2330-2340
(1)
LOAD I
mi
m
sis
903
165
898
192
m
m
m
m
OILER
m i
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.6
3.3
3.7
3.7
3.7
(3)
§02
IBM?!
2112
2110
2084
2116
2108
2111
2059
2053
2043
— —.-VI
(4)
02
Mry 1
S.OS
3.07
S.25
S.20
S.21
3.21
S.4S
5.43
S.44
HI
(5}
CO
ipMry
41.4
44.9
47.0
58.5
(1.4
££.1
80.1
as.2
K.I
(&)
C02
if«n *
13.37
13.33
13.19
12.77
12.E1
12.31
12.13
12.09
U.tt
«?)
NO 1
»PMry 1
1198
1191
1141
1094
1083
1911
137
f£4
XI
(8!
WPWI
(3102 1
13S3
1331
1304
1246
2235
1233
1110
1117
1U3
(9)
ND '
b/ibtu 1
1.8S
1.83
1.79
1.71
1.69
1.69
1.32
1.S3
1.53
(10)
S02
b/ibtu
4.34
4.34
4.S4
4.59
4.38
4.19
4.33
4.53
4.31
AVCRA8C
880
3.6
2989 3.27 S3.4 12.67
1073
1229 IM 4.39
(1) Unit load rtcordid triry 13 rin. fro* control
(2) Average ieilir 02, recorded trtry IS tin.
-------
PARADISE UNIT 3
PttADlSE UNIT 3 PCECIPITATOR OUTLET F DUCT
04-03- l«l
TIRE
0812-0830
0830-0845
0845-0900
0900-0915
0915-0930
0930-0945
0945-1000
1000-1015
1015-1030
1030-1045
104S-1100
1100-1115
1115-1130
1130-1145
1145-1200
1200-1215
1215-1230
1230-1245
1245-1300
1300-1315
13:5-1330
1330-1345
1345-1404
(1)
LOAD
RU
1043
1045
1046
1046
1046
1046
1047
1046
104£
1050
1048
1047
1047
1047
1046
1044
1045
1041
1043
1041
1042
1042
1040
(2)
BOILER
02
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.3
3.5
3.S
3.4
3.J
3.4
3.5
(3) (4) (5)
S02 02 CO
(6)
C02
ppe, dry I, dry ppi,dry l,dry
1SS4 5. 25 20.2
1597 5.36 21.3
1S9S 3.3S 21.5
1604 5.25 21.6
1611 5.31 21.9
1610 5.32 22.1
1594 S.3S 22.1
1583 5.35 22.1
1565 5.35 22.6
1564 5.41 22.5
1569 5.46 22.7
1582 5.44 22.7
1589
1599
1614
1616
1639
1657
1676
1706
1728
1752
.41 22.8
.37 23.0
.38 23.0
.42 22.9
.41 22.7
.37 22.6
.35 22.3
.30 22.5
.38 22.3
.31 22.7
1758 5.34 22.8
13.44
13.92
13.93
14.00
13.97
13.97
13.97
14.00
14.01
13.97
13.94
13.96
13.96
13.98
13.97
13.93
13.95
14.00
14.04
14.12
14.08
14.14
14.11
(7)
NO
ppi.dry
1196
1236
123S
1244
1214
1209
1198
1191
1182
1161
1149
1153
1157
1160
1197
1139
1139
1147
1172
1204
1189
1221
1217
(8) (9)
NO PPfl NO
1 31 02 Ib/abtu
1367
1423
1421
1421
1392
1388
1378
1370
1359
1340
1331
1336
1337
1336
1332
1315
1315
1321
1348
1380
1370
1400
1399
.87
.95
.93
.95
.91
.90
.89
.88
.86
.84
.82
.83
.83
.83
.83
.80
.80
.81
.85
.89
.88
.92
.92
(10)
502
IMtbtu
3.38
3.50
3.49
3.49
3.52
3.S2
3.49
3.47
3.43
3.44
3.46
3.49
3.49
3.51
3.54
3.56
3.61
3.64
3.67
3.73
3.79
3.83
3.85
AVERAGE
1045
3.5 1625 5.36 22.3 13.97 1186 1364 1.87
3.56
(1) Unit load recorded WTJJ 15 «•. frot control board.
(2) Average boiler 02, recorded tmy 15 tin. frot
control board.
(3) Van MasureMflt of dcct SQ2, dry basis, 15 itc. reading! averaged
over a IS ail. piriod.
(4) Van Masurntot of d«ct 02, dry basis, IS uc. readings averaged
ovtr a 15 tin. period.
(5) Van Kisorennt of CO, ppaf dry basil, 15 ttc. readings averaged
ovtr a IS tin. piriod.
(6) Van Masurmnt of CQ2, Z dry basil, 15 tec. readings averaged
ovar a IS iin. piriod.
(7) Van eeasurcMnt of NO, ppe, dry basis, IS uc. readings aviragtd
over a IS ain. piriod.
(8) Van •easuruent of NO, ppi, correct id to 32 02, IS sec.
riadings averaged over a IS -tin. period.
(9) Eeittion rate, NO, Ib/riTU (actual), calculated fret VAN NO eeasureacnts.
(10) Emission rate, S02, Ib/eBTU, calculated frot VAI S02 ttaMreteati.
89
-------
PARADISE UNIT 3
PARADISE BASELINE TEST UNIT 3
«»*MM.MI»«M««.*.M>» <""••— Y A N «' •"•"•" - UU •
03-OI-H91 (U «> (3) (4) (5) CSJ <7>
TIKE LOAD BOILER S02 02 CO C02 MO
ttt 02 ppMry l,*ry PPMry Mry ffMT
1002-1015 971 3.5 1859 S.08 30.6 13.22 9S3
1015-1030 971 3.7 1K2 3,14 13.3 13,21 987
1030-1045 S76 3.1 1173 5.24 36.8 13.15 »0
1 045-1 1M 972 3.7 1126 5.06 41.3 13.31 117
1131-1U5 970 3,5 1978 108 28.4 13.34 990
1145*1200 " 967 3.5 1990 3,06 36.2 13.35 1002
1231-1245 976 3.5 1966 5.11 26,2 13,20 199
1245-1300 971 3.6 1936 5.28 32.S 13.12 1084
1300-1315 975 3.7 1970 5.18 37.S 13.20 1099
1315-1330 971 3.7 1970 5.24 42.5 13.17 1064
1330-1345 973 3.7 196? 5.24 51.6 13. IS 1899
1345-1400 974 3.1 19S9 3.29 53.0 13.19 1073
1400-1415 978 3.S I9S4 3.22 63.5 13.19 1091
1415-1430 971 3.7 19(4 5.21 62.6 13.25 1098
1430-1441 978 3.6 1958 5.25 71.9 13.26 1094
1445-1500 975 3.7 1952 S.27 75.5 13.24 1088
ISOQ-ISIS 973 3.7 1949 3.21 86.2 13.21 1086
1515-1530 170 3.9 1956 3.30 90.8 13.18 1073
1530-1543 971 3.6 1974 5.11 97.7 13.33 1129
NOME 973 3.6 1948 5.19 52.4 13.23 1051
(1) Unit load recorded every 15 uo. frot control board.
(21 Average boiler 02, mortal every IS tio. (roi
control beard.
(31 Van NiturnMt of fact S82, drjr bull, 15 ftc. rttdingi aviriftd
ovtr a 13 its. period.
(4) Van HasurtMnt of duct 02, dry baiit, 13 we. readings averaged
over i IS lii. period.
(5) Vw MI tar went of CO, •*•, try laiit, IS we. readiogi awifid
ovtr a 13 aii. period.
(61 VM Mtiarewiit of 032, 1 dry iuif, 13 we. fMdiiff avetiged
over a IS it*, period.
(7) Van HiMTtiKrt oi tt, ui, Iff iatit, IS we. rtadiogs averagfd
ovtr a 15 lift, period.
(8) Van Mifureteflt of •, pal, corrected to 31 02, 13 we.
readings averaged over a IS aia. period.
(8)
no mi
1 31 02
UU
1120
1139
1036
1119
1132
1203
1241
1250
1216
1209
1222
1244
1231
1230
1246
1244
1233
1274
1196
m
m
Ib/ibtu
1.32
1.53
1.5S
1.42
1.53
l.SS
1.65
1.70
1.71
1.67
1.66
1.67
1.71
1.71
1.71
1,71
1.70
1.61
1.73
1.64
(10)
$02
Ib/tbtu
4.00
4.02
4.08
4.14
4.26
4.28
4.26
4.27
4.27
4.29
4.28
4.I/
4.27
4.2T
4.26
4.26
4.2S
4.27
4.26
4.22
(9) £iii«ion rate, NO, Ib/ilTU (actnal), calcnlattd fr« VAX M •MsarNMti.
(10) Eiiitioa rate, SD2, Ib/alTU, caknUttd frot VAN m waureMnti.
90
-------
SHAUNCE UNIT 2 itSEUKI TIST
SHAWNEE UNIT 2
0?-Oi-I99l (I) (2) <3)
TIM 1.0*0 10ILCR S02
HU 02 ppo.dry
0809-0815 153 2.4 416
0815-0830 153 2,4 428
0830-0845 153 2.4 428
0845-0900 153 2.4 425
0900-0915 153 2.4 426
09IS-0910 IS6 2.1 42»
0930-0945 IS6 2.3 421
0945*1000 156 2,3 417
1000-1015 156 2,3 416
1015-1030 156 2.4 416
1030-1045 155* 2,3 416
104S-MOO t56 2,3 414
1100-1)15 155 2,
!I!S-M26 156 2,
1200-1215 154 2,
12(5-1230 155 2,
I2JO-1245 154 2,
1245-1300 154 2.
1300-1315 154 2.
1315-1330 154 2,
1330*1345 153 2.
1345-1410 153 2.
1430-1445 152 2.
1445-1500 153 2.
1500*1515 153 2.
1515*1530 153 2.
1530-1545 152 2.
1545-1600 151 2.
1600-1615 152 2,
1615-1630 IS2 2.
1630*1645 152 2.
1645-1700 152 2.
414
412
400
403
401
375
399
398
397
397
426
426
426
427
421
425
4Z5
425
426
426
1700-17)1 I Si 2.4 426
(1) Unit lead racerdad a»try (5 Bin.
02
l.dry
6
6
(•
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
1
7
6
6
6
7
6
froa
<2) »»trtgt Dollar 02. rteordtd atary IS •
control board.
(1) Van Baamraawnt of duct fOI. dry
o?er a IS Bin. -ptrlod.
kasli
(4) Van atituraaent af duet 02. dry bails.
ertr a IS ain. ptrlod.
(S) Van aaasuraatnt of CO, ppa. dry
o»ar a IS Bin. ptrlad.
btili.
.84
.80
,76
,00
.78
,85
,83
,91
.87
.80
.80
.80
.75
.76
.99
.04
.03
,65
,91
,98
.99
.00
.04
,06
.03
.06
.09
.01
.01
.04
.06
.00
.02
.van----""----"— -.—»-«---• -„-— -
(5) (6) (7) (8)
CO C02 NO «0 CPU
ppm.ary S.dry ' ppw.dry 6 IS 02
"22
23
24
24
24
24
25
24
24
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
27
26
27
27
31
30
11
11
12
It
32
12
32
32
31
.8
,5
.4
,5
.4
.6
,2
.5
.6
.2
.6
.2
.9
,4
.4
.3
.2
.3
,1
,7
.1
.7
.4
.9
.S
.9
.0
.6
.4
.6
.4
.9
.4
11
il
12
12
12
12
12
12
U
12
12
.89
.97
.12
.19
.28
.27
,14
,30
,32
.40
.46
12.48
12
12
12
12
12
11
12
12
12
12
11
11
13
13
12
12
12
It
12
11
12
.57
.<9
.33
.31
.36
.77
.45
.35
.32
.30
.13
.09
.06
.03
.»
.91
.96
.96
.93
.00
.96
477
470
476
480
482
486
485
417
489
481
490
489
469
490
491
496
499
460
504
502
497
496
467
492
467
466
490
491
461
490
469
469
468
606
596
601
609
610
618
616.
621
623
618
621
620
616
621
632
642
643
620
644
644
638
636
586
592
565
566
592
192
569
S90
S69
S67
S67
(91
NO
ib/«ttu
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,79
,77
.78
.79
.79
.80
.80
.61
.61
.80
.80
.80
,60
.60
.62
.63
.61
.60
.63
.61
.63
.63
.76
.77
.76
,76
.77
.77
.76
.76
.16
.7*
.76
control board.
In.
froa
. IS tae. raidiitfs
IS
IS
aac, r lading*
ite. rtafltng*
(6) Von BtaturaBtnt of C02, K dry Mill. IS lac. rtad Ing-
over a IS Bin. ptrlod.
(7) Van Baasuraaant of NO. ppB, dry
01 tr • IS Bin. ptrlod.
easts.
(8) Van BtasuraBant of NO. ppa. eorractad
ritdingj avtraftd *var a IS Bin.
15
ts
•»trtgtd
a*ira§td
attragad
avtrtged
lac. rtad in 91
31 02,
avarogtd
IS iee.
ptried.
(9! Caistlon rata, NO. ib/aflTii (actual;, ealetiiatad froa
V»« NO atasurtBMte.
91
-------
SHAWNEE UNIT 2
SMJWNCE UNIT 2 PtRFOfiMNCE TEST
03-21-199' I'} (2) (3) (4) (5) (65 '7)
TIBE 19»C BOILEt S02 02 CO C02 HO
nu 02 ppft.ary H.Ory ppn.dry S.dry ppn.flry
UlS-illO 158 2.1 423 £.23 24.0 12.30 467
1130-H4S 157 1.8 44? 6,41 24,6 12.12 486
1145-1200 153 2.0 441 6.44 24.5 12.74 485
1200-1215 )5S 2.1 443 6.41 24.3 12.6? 4*0
1228-1245 154 1.9 455 6.23 2S.2 12.9? 453
1245-1300 157 1.8 456 6.19 25. S 11. IS 456
1300-1315 155 1,9 460 6.16 2S.3 13.19 452
1315-1330 .157 l.I 457 6.19 25.7 13.31 450
1330-1345 152 l.S 446 6.36 25.0 13.16 451
1345-1400 152 2.0 447 6.25 24.9 13.01 445
1400-1422 (SI 2.1 441 6.29 25.1 12.9? 448
1432-1445 151 1.9 458 5.60 25.6 13.69 410
1445-1500 113 J.i- 452 S.6? 2S.4 13. St 48S
1540-1600 137 1.6 453 5.12 25.8 13.51 452
I600-I6IS 139 2.3 445 5.54 25.5 13.30 468
161i-t630 137 2.0 44$ .4? 26.0 13.27 463
1630-1645 137 2.0 439 .62 25.1 11.16 472
1645-1700 (38 2.9 417 .14 24.? 12.70 494
1700-1715 137 2.7 420 .19 24,1 12.68 49?
1715-1730 137 2.4 426 .07 24.0 12.83 494
1730-174$ 141 2.4 42} .07 24,0 12.88 494
1745-1800 142 2.8 417 .2? 21. 1 12.65 499
1800*1115 143 2,6 421 .14 23. f 12.77 SOI
1815*1830 138 2.8 418 .20 23,4 12.76 SOI
1830-1845 140 2.8 417 .22 23.4 12.73 5C2
1900-1915 143 2.t '19 .11 21.S 12.71 502
(tl unit laid recorded every IS Bin, fro» control boerd.
(21 Average eoller 02, recorded every IS Bin. fro*
control eaerd.
(!) v»n MiturtBent of duet SOI, dry betii, IS »ec. reading* averaged
over e IS ejln. period.
(43 Von MiiurBM-it of duet 02, dry belli. IS eee. reedtngt avenged
ever e IS Bin. period.
(5} von BeeiureaMt of CO. ppa, dry be»l». IS tee. reedlngi evereged
over • IS Bin. period.
<6> von •eeiureBent of C02. t dry botlt, IS tee, reeding* averaged
ever e IS Bin, period.
(7) von MeiwMifit of HO, PPB. dry tails. IS tec. reeding* everofed
over e IS nil), period.
(8) von BeitureBcnt of NO. ppa. corrected to 31 02. IS tee.
reedinp evere«ed over e IS Bin. period.
(9) tftiuiofl rite, NO. Ib/efTU (actual), eileuloted from ¥«« NO MIIUTCM
NO ffn
1 3* CZ
569
600
600
592
$52
SS4
141
14?
sss
542
S49
561
169
519
545
537
SS2
599
604
S9S
596
610
609
610
611
610
Tlti,
HO
0.71
0.82
0.82
0.81
0.76
0.76
0.75
0.71
0.76
0.74
0.75
0.77
0.71
0.71
0.75
0.74
9.76
8.8f
0.83
0.82
0.82
0.84
0.8}
0.84
0.84
0.84
92
-------
SHAWNIE UNIT 6
SHAVN&
UNIT 6
OATS
IM5-M
12-OM9
12-01-19
12-01-19
12-06-89
12-M4I
12-07-19
12-01-19
MVff
ll-OT-lf
Wlf 1
12-12-W
12-12-11
12-12-M
12-12-19
12-12-11
ll-M-il
12-1141
12-14-lf
TEST ID:
TIKE TKST
1111/1217
14H/15U
0130/0909
1415/1515
1S33/1131
1803/1905
0104/0141
09U/1004
1044/1111
1344/1412
0931/100?
It0i/113f
1214/1224
1225/1244
1321/1400
Wli/llil
1310/1331
1415/1453
i - HIGH LOAD
19
A
B
C
0
K
r
6
H
BB
**
A
g
1C
0
I
1
I
H
H08NIL
'B1
HV BOlLKh 02 '
1M
1M
14f
150_
17
11
10
ff
JS~
1*4,
150
14f
141
147
ill
n
n
n
02
J.JS
3.1(1
3.01
A46
S.10
f.Ol
S.I*
S.20
JJL.
2.36
2.42
i.r/
1.21
1.4J
1.27.
1*41
1,11
3.3i
• - tail
02
i orv
l.ltt
fc.Ji
*.4i
5.55
9.51
9.31
9.44
1.11
1.43
S.40
f.2l
*.5fl
4.92
5.32
1.M
1.24
i.ia
1.3S
LOAD Ml
CO
DM orv
23, 1U
2S.21
23.39
20.55
19.31
20.42
23.22
14.24
21.57
IS. 17
21.70
3Y.34
1*7.07
44.11
21.31
2f.1f
H»,ll
34.43
eiui. m
NU
DM vec
Iff i.2l
411.41
41/.I1
454.24
312.19
3S1.11
372.44
311. «
271.31
414.14
442.14
401. If
313.00
404.27
411.22
333.11
iii.ll
211.00
ii
0>2
% orv
1J.1B
U.»
12. W
1J.53
10.18
10.32
10.21
10.fi
11.1*
13. ti
13.33
U.92
14.3i
1J.72
12.21
11. U
MO NU NU
DO! UtV Qfv j| ID/WH
Ui.
4»0.
44S.
49V.
390.
311.
400.
319.
219.
441
471,,
4J1.
411,
431,
TS »M.«
»8 ftl)J,42
4J iiV.14
18 iH.f 8
20 6U-3J
11 191. 11
41 MJ.11
20 572.74
21 421. fit
31 513.12
14 M2.IT
3» 500.19
,13 4bO.S5
15 50i.40
0.1*4
o.»
U. 1(1
O.HI
o.tt
0.11
0.90
0.13
0.12,
o.n
U.81
tf.'/l
O.bt
IK/1
UtuJI Ui.fci (J.9S
3M.TI Ml.»
lfl,li 3U.YI |»3.lQ
11.75
\ . IWBU.
0.14
O.'ll
ttf.M iti.il i.|i.
tiinn
uitDHWo uuai i
n*n
i 4 C - .3 aJtDUCTJW H 02
9 - HIM LOAD UI1IU 02
r i 6 - '.3 tfixcnoi n 02
H - UN LOW HtlilM 02
93
SI - UMAUICfO MjiilMS UN LOAD
i - iin vm lien 02
-------
SHAWNEE UNIT 9
SHAHNEE UNIT 9, AIR HEATER OUTLET
CH (F) (I
TIME 02 CO C02 Mi Mit B LOAD U 02 AIR » All OUT PIKY All SCOT AIR BUM
0*30-1030 S.9S 7S.1I 12.1? 43S.37 322.67 165.M 2.78 115.« |»,S8 167.75 £44,34
1115-1215 fi.50 26,21 11.94 430.13 535.16 133.00 3.22 118.22 649.21 U6.S7 I41.S4
124B-1339 £.4* 26.92 12.04 438.19 143.30 154.M 3.% 120.97 654.00 lfil.00 S44.1S
1335-1429 6.47 28,13 12.01 433.92 339.98 154.00 3.13 121.34 655.00 167.11 643.00
1442-1514 6.36 32.03 12.07 413.97 349,0* 194.00 3.04 122.03 654.97 167.13 644.63
IS ACTUAL VAUI
(101 I K II ACTUAL CQS1ECTCD TO 31 021
94
-------
RESULTS
WIDOWS CREEK UNIT 7
UNIT 7 SCRUBBER
4/5/90
See notes: < 1 )
TIME LOAD
PERIOD
1000-1015
1015-1030
1030-1045
3045-1055
1130-1145
1145-1200
491
490
502
494
488
491
INLET
(2)
BO I LEE
O2
2.6
2.6
2.3
2.8
2.9
2.5
(3)
VAN
XO2
DRY
6.4
6.5
6.6
7.2
7.1
7.4
(4)
VAN
NO.Dpre
3* 02
WET
440
448
456
485
486
479
(5)
VAN
NO
(6)
VAN
CO
Ib/raBtu PPM
0.68
0.69
0.70
0.75
0.75
0.75
DRY
22
23
23
22
23
24
(7)
VAN
CO2
X
DRY
11.8
11.9
11.7
11.6
11.6
11 .5
(8)
VAM
S02
PPM
DRY
1872
1946
1955
1953
1714
1758
AVERAGES
493 2.6
6.9 466
0.72
23 11.7
1866
1250-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
AVERAGES
310
311
293
296
309
3.5
3.8
4.1
4.3
4.4
8.7
8.6
9.3
8.8
9.1
430
434
463
450
469
304 4.0
8.9 449
0.67
0.67
0.72
0.70
0.73
0.70
is
16
16
16
16
16
10.2
10
10
10
10
10.2
1557
1608
1583
1586
1614
1590
NOTES:
(1) Unit load recorded every 10-15 min. from control board.
(2) Average boiler O2X from superheat and reheat furnaces, recorded
every 10-15 Bin. iron control board.
(3) VAN measurement of 02k on a dry basis, average of 10-second read-
ings.
(4) VAN measurement of NO. ppm, corrected to 3* O2; aver-
age of 10-second readings.
(5) Emission rate, NO. Ib/mBtu, calculated from VAN NO measurements
and VAN *02.
(6) VAN measurement of CO, ppm, on a dry basis, average of 10-second
readings.
VAN measurement of C02, X, on a dry basis, average of 10-second
readings.
VAN measurement of S02, ppm, on a dry basis, average of 10-second
readings. gg
-------
WIDOWS CREEK UNIT 8
RESULTS
UNIT 8 SCRUBBER INLET
~"~| f JVI filMP
IP i!??$ 1 tjl*\
0940-0950
0950-1000
1020-1030
1030-1050
1050-1110
1110.-1125
1140-1150
1150-1210
1210-1230
1230-1245
(1)
LOAD
419
419
406
418
430
435
414
403
422
418
(2)
BOILER
O2
3.4
3.4
3.2
3.3
2.8
3.4
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.2
(3)
VAN
X02
PRY
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.3
7.6
7.5
VAN
NO.pptq
3* 02
WET
368
365
364
374
371
370
379
361
370
368
(5)
VAN
NO
Ib/mBtu
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.58
0.57
0.57
0.58
0.56
0.57
0.57
(6)
CEM
kO2
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
(7)
CEM
JNCLppw
3* 02
WET
286
286
295
286
286
286
286
286
278
278
(8)
CEM
NO
liJ/mBt
0.45
0.45
0.46
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.43
0.43
AVERAGES
418 "3.2
7.5 369
0.57 10.0 285
0.45
96
-------
WIDOWS CREEK UNIT 8
UNIT 8 SCRUBBER INLET
8/31
See
TIME
PERI
/89
notes :
OD
(1 )
LOAD
(2)
BOILER
02
(3)
VAN
X02
DRY
(4)
VAN
NOjDDm
3*
02
(5)
VAN
NO
Ib/mBtu
(6)
CEM
X02
(7)
CEM.
NO,
3*
ppm
02
OS)
CEM
NO
Ib/mBtu
0830-0850
0850-0910
0930-0940
AVERAGES
1015-1030
1030-1050
1050-1110
1110-1130
.130-1150
1110-1230
230-1250
AVERAGES
WET
WET
420
414
414
416
300
305
295
293
300
294
295
3.4
3.4
3.7
3.5
4.0
3.9
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.4
7.8
7.8
7.9
380
376
390
0.59
0.58
0.60
10.0
11.0
12.0
286
25?
306
7.8 382
9.1
8.3
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.0
7.B
375
348
338
336
333
339
333
0.59 11.0 296
0.58
0.54
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.52
0.51
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
270
270
270
270
260
270
270
297 3.6
8.2 343
0.53 12.0 270
0.45
0.39
0.55
0.46
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
NOTES:
(1) Unit load recorded every 10-15 min. from control board.
(2) Average boiler O2k from superheat and reheat furnaces, recorded
every 10-15 min. from control board.
(3) VAN measurement of 02* on * dry basis, average of 10-second readings
(4) VAN measurement of NO, ppm, corrected to 3k O2; average of 10-se-
cond readings.
(5) Emission rate, NO, Ib/mBtu, calculated from VAN-NO measurements
and VAN *O2.
(6) CEM measurement of O2k, stack conditions, read every 10-15-min.
from strip chart in control room.
(7) CEM measurement of NO, ppm. corrected to 3k O2, read every
10-15-min. from strip chart In control room.
(8) Emission rate, NO, Ib/mBtu, calculated from CEM NO and CEM XO2.
97
-------
Date: 3-8-90 ALLEN UNIT 1
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER SERVICE CENTER
Sample Identity Allen Unit fl
Date Sampled 1-10-90
Laboratory No. 90-1526
Air Dry Moisture 10.1
Residual Moisture 2.3
Total Moisture 12.2
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Matter 37.4
I Ash 9.2
I Fixed Carbon 53.4
* Total Sulfur 2.56
Btu/lb
As Received
Dry 13,312
A and MF 14,663
Ultimate Analysis
% Carbon 74.5
% Hydrogen 4.9
I Nitrogen 1.6
% Oxygen 7.24
Forms of S
X Sulfate
* Pyritic
I Organic
t Total
Grindability Index
1 Chlorine
NOTE; All results are on dry basis unless stated otherwise.
Analyxed by: 8CK/ASC (0917L)
Date Analyzed: 3-6-90
Distribution:
99
BCK:RMM
-------
Date: November 8, 1989
COLBERT UNIT 3 AND 5
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
VALLEY AUTHORITY
CKBTEAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAHOOCA POWER SERVICE CEHTBR
Sample Identity
CFP Unit *5
CFP Unit ffl
Date Sampled
Laboratory No.
Air Dry Moisture
Realdual MoiBture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
I Volatile Hatter
I Aah
I Fixed Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
A* Received
Dry
A and MF
Ultimate Analytia
I carbon
1 Hydrogen
1 Oxygen
Fonu of s
% Sulfate
% Pyritic
% Organic
% Total
Crindabillty Index
% Chlorine
9-25-89
90-0007
6.8
2.6
9.2
37.5
12.6
49.9
2.55
12,702
14,538
71.1
5.0
1.4
7.35
9-28-89
90-0008
6.0
2.5
8.4
37.4
12.9
49.7
2.52
12,597
14.466
70.7
4.9
1.4
7.58
•OTB: All r««ulti mem on dry buit unlasi stated otherwise.
Analyzed by: B. C.Hudion/A. S. Gary (1399O)
Diatribution:
100
-------
MU: 3-27-90
COLBERT UNIT 4
Sample Identity
11POBT OF AMALySIS - COAL ANALYSISREPQHT
TtmfgSSEE VALLEY AUTHOIIT*
CEKT5AL LABORATORIES - CHATTAHOOgA POMES SS8VICE CEMTI1
Colbert
Unit *4
"BOX TEST
Date Sampled
Laboratory Bo.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Matter
% Ash
% Fixed Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
AJ Received
Dry
A and KF
Ultimate Analysis
X carbon
% Hydrogen
% Mitroien
% Oxygen
Forma of S
V Sulf ate
* Pyritic
% Organic
% Total
Crindability Index
% Chlorine
90-2398
12.0
3.7
15,3 .
37,5
9.1
53. 4
2. 21
11,2*9
14,512
74,9
5.0
1.7
7.09
MOTE; All results are on dry basis unless stated otherwise.
Analyzed by; BCH (1045L)
Date Analyzed : 3-22-90
Distribution:
BCH:1HB
101
-------
August 14. 1989
CUMBERLAND UNITS 1 AND 2
REPORT OF AHALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
fEHHESSEE VALLgY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER SERVICE CEHTES
Sample Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory ¥o.
Air Dry Hoiature
Baaidual Hoiature
Total Hoiature
Proximate Analysis
* Volatile Hatter
% Aah
% Fixed Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
Aa Beceived
Dry
A and HP
Ultimate Analyaia
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Hitrogen
* Oxygen
forma of S
* Sulfate
* Pyritie
% Organic
* Total
STOCK
Unit 2
PL-351-BuS
2nd Shift
6/30/89
89-3317
2.8
10.8
9.6
49.6
3.27
13.095
14.480
73.0
5.2
1.6
7.33
EMISSION TEST -
Unit 2
PL-352-BuS
3rd Shift
6/30/89
89-3318
3.5
39.8
9.9
50.3
3.06
13.056
14,498
73.1
5.2
1.6
7.14
CUMBERLAND FOSSIL PLANT
Unit 1
PL-360
2nd Shift
7/7/89
89-3319
3.4
40.2
9.8
50.0
3.17
13.064
14,489
73.1
5.1
1.6
7.23
Grindability Index
* Chlorine
.12
.12
.12
BOTB: All reaulta are on dry baaia unleaa atatod otherwiae.
102
-------
Date: August 14, 1989
CUMBERLAND UNIT 2
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER SERVICE CENTER
Sample Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
* Volatile Matter
* Ash
% Fixed Carbon
* Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
As Received
Dry
A and MF
Ultloata Analysis
* Carbon
* Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
1 Oxyg«n
Forms of s
1 Sulfate
* Pyritic
1 Organic
* Total
STOCK
Unit 2
PL-344-BuS
2nd Shift
6/27/89
89-3312
2.4
40.6
9.4
50.0
3.17
13,016
14,469
73.3
5.2
1.6
7.33
mission TEST
Unit 2
PL-345-BuS
2nd Shift
6/28/89
89-3313
2.3
40.9
9.2
49.9
3.10
13,190
14,529
73.5
5.3
1.6
7.30
- CUMBERLAND
Unit 2
PL-346-BuS
3rd Shift
6/28/89
89-3314
2.3
••
40.7
9.2
50.1
3.14
13,187
14,525
73.7
5.3
1.6
7.06
FOSSIL PLANT
Unit 2
PL-348-BuS-
2nd Shift
6/29/89
89-3315
2.6
40.5
10.0
49.5
3.25
13.089
14,537
73.0
5.2
1.6
6.95
Crindabillty Index
I Chlorine .12 .11 .11
VOTE: All results are on dry DASis unless stated otherwise.
Analyzed by: Billle Hudson/Robert Brannan (3593C)
.12
Unit 2
PL-349-BuS
3rd Shift
6/29/89
89-3316
2.5
40.6
9.8
49.6
3.25
13,037
14,461
72.7
5.2
1.6
7.45
.12
103
-------
Date: August 3, 1989
GALLATIN UNITS 1 AND 2
B1M1T OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
tlSlflSSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CntHAL LABORATORIES - CKATTAMOOGA POWER S81?IC1
Sample Xdantity
Callatin #1
Callatin f2
Data Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Mr Dry Mo is turd
taaitfual MoUture
Total Hoistura
Proxlaata Analyfla
* VolmtlU Hattar
% Ftxa4 Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
A» Racaivad
Dry
A and BT
ULttaata Aaalyala
% Carbon
* Hydrogan
% litrojan
% Ojcyjeo
Forms of S
% Sulfata
89-3279
2.5
34.8
11.2
SO.4
3.13
12,919
14,545
72.4
4.9
l.i
% Organic
1 Total
CrindabiUty Indax
% Chlorina
rOTK: All racult* ana on dry b**i* tmla«* *tat*d
7/11/89
89-3280
2.3
38.9
8,7
S2.4
3.01
13,425
14,704
74.9
S.I
1.7
Analyxad by; Billia Hud«on/A. Scott Gary (357AC)
104
-------
GALLATIN UNIT 2
Data: August 2*. 1990
EKPOET OF ANALYSIS - COALANALYSIS REPORT
TEilMESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CEMTHAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAHOOGA POWER SERVICE CUffEE
Saspla Identity
Data Sao?lad
Laboratory Bfo.
Air Dry Boiftura
Rasidual Moiftura
Total Molitura
Proxlaata Analysla
% Volatlla Mattar
% Fixad Carbon
I Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
Aa laeaivad
Callatio
C-2
Unit 02
Coal Sealai
8/1/90
90-4676
6.6
3.1
9,5
10.6
2.65
13,301
14,883
73.9
S.I
1.5
6.25
A and KF
Ultinata Analy«i«
% Carbon
% Hydrojan
% IitroR«n
% Oxygan
Forma of S
% Sulfata
% Pyritic
% Ortanle
% Total
Crlndabllity Inoax
% Chlorlna
10TS: All raaulfc* ara on dry ba«l« unlatt vtatad otliacviia,
Analyxad by: Blllia Hudton/V. L. lo«a. Jr. (4317C)
Data Analyrad: 8/17/90
105
-------
Data: 12/21/90
JOHN SEVIER UNITS 2, 3, AND 4
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COM. AMAL*S1S tEpOI?
TIH1T1SSEE VALLEY AOTHOIIII
CSNT1M, LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER lltVlCI CESTE8
Sample Identity
Data Sampled
Laboratory Ho-
Mr Dry Moisture
£**idual Moisture
Total Moiatura
Proximal* Analyiif
% Volatil* Battar
% A*!t
% Fixad Carbon
% total Sulfur
Btu/lb
Aa Bacaiiraft
Dry
4 and Ml .
Ultlnafca Analytit
% Carbon
% Hydrog«n
% titrogan
% Oxygen
Formi of S
% Sulfata
% Pyritlc ,
I Orsmnic
% total
SBV-Unit 3
10:45-1:00
10-11-90
91-01S3
5.6
1.1
6.6
3S.Z
10.0
54.8
2.07
13,665
15.185
7i.f
S.I.
1.7
4.43
SBV-Unit 4
7:30-10:00
10-11-90
91-0184
6.5
1.1
7.S
35.1
i.7
56.2
1.12
13,978
15,309
7i.l
S.I
1.8
4.48
SEY-Unit 2
10.17-90
91-0365
3.1
1.3
6.1
3S.6
9.7
54.7
1.71
13,613
15,080
76.5
5.0
1.7
5.39
Crind.billty Indax
% Chlorina
•OZS: All r««uLt« ar« on dry ba«i» unl*««
ottwrwit*.
Analyzad by; BCH:tfLR(4574C)
Data of An*ly«i»: 12/7/90
106
-------
it«: Baeaaber 7, 1989
JOHNSONVILLE UNIT 10
REPORT Of ANALYSIS - COAt AHALYSISREPORT
fjanHSSEE VALLE* AUTHOSITY
CISTHAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAMOOCA POWES SERVICE CETTEE
Identity
Johnaonvilla
Unit Ho. 10
from Coal Seal*
it* Sampled
iborttory Ho.
Lr Dry
isidual Moittum
)U1 Moittur*
roxiaate An«ly«i«
% Volatile lUtter
% Fixad Carbon
1 Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
&• Baeaivad
11/7/Sf
3.7
37.9
11.8
50.3
1.65
12,113
14,306
4.8
1.5
8.63
ma of S
Sulfata
Pyritlc
Organic
Total
inability
Chlorina
Tt: All raaulta ara oa dry baaia unlaaa atatad otharvlaa.
A and HP
timata Analyaia
Carbon
Hydrogen
•itrogaa
alyzad by: Billia Hud•on/A. Scott Gary (3896C)
107
-------
Date: 3-26-90
KINGSTON UNIT 5
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TfTOESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CEHTEAL LABORATORIES - OUTTAHOOCA POWER SERVICE CE1TTBH
Sample Identity
K Unit t 5
ABC Scales
1:00 p.m.
Date Sampled
Laboratory No.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
I Volatile Matter
I Ash
I Fixed Carbon
I Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
Ac Received
Dry
A and MF
Ultimate Analysis
* Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Oxygen
Forms of S
% Sulfate
* Pyritic
% Organic
I Total
Grindability Index
% Chlorine
3-13-90
90-2516
5.4
1.6
6.9
37.2
11.2
51.6
1.55
13,278
14,950
74.2
5.0
1.7
4.55
HOTE: All results are on dry basis unless stated otherwise.
Analyzed by: BCH (103ID
108
-------
Date: May 10, 1991
SHAWNEE UNIT 2
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TEHBESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAMOOCA POWER SESVICE CENTEH
Sample Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Matter
% Ash
% Fixed Carbon
1 total Sulfur
Btu/lb
A* Received
Dry
A and H7
Pttnate Analysis
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Ox/gen
Porn* of S
% Sulfate
I Pyrltic
1 Organic
% Total
Brindsbillty Index
K Chlorine
•OTS: All results are on dry basis unless stated otherwise.
S2-C-1045-1445
Unit 2C Mill
1045-1445
2/26/91
91-2997
3.6
1.9
5.4
34.4
9.7
55.9
.67
13,559
U.012
76.6
5.0
1.4
6.63
S-6007M
Unit 2B Mill
0900>1130
2/20/91
91-2998
7.9
2.3
10.0
34.7
11.3
54.0
.69
13,027
14,679
74.3
4.8
l.S
7.41
S-6008M
Unit 2B Mill
1215-1S15
2/20/91
91-2999
8.3
2.2
10.3
34.8
11.0
54.2
.70
13,072
14,694
74.5
4.9
1.4
7.50
S-6009M
Unit 26 Mill
1000-1100
2/21/91
91-3000
6.3
1.5
7.7
33.5
9.5
57.0
.62
13,604
15,039
77.3
4.9
1.4
6.28
S-6010H
Unit 2B Mi
1200-1300
2/21/91
91-3001
5.8
1.3
7.0
33.8
9.6
56.6
.61
13,664
15.119
J7.3
4.9
1.4
6.19
Analyzsd by; Billie Hudson/Verinda Smith (SAV - S086C)
Date of Analysis: 4/29/91
DISTRIBUTION.
Phil D. tingle, HR 3B-C
Donna Crabtree, E-Mail
109
-------
Date:
10, 1991
SHAWNEE UNIT 2
TOQET Of ANALYSIS - COM. ANALYSIS REPORT
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHAltAMOOCA POWER SERVICE CENTER
Staple Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Air Dry Moisture
tecidual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Hatter
% Ash
% Fixed Carbon
* Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
As Received
Dry
A and MF
Ultlaata Analysis
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% litrogen
% Oxygen
forms of 3
% Sulfate
% Pyrltie
I Organic
* total
S-Unit 2
Raw Coal
RPT A-l
3/20/91
91-3003
6.1
1.9
7.9
34. S
10,3
54, f
.69
13,322
14,651
7S.f
S.O
l.S
6.81
S-Unit 2
Raw Coal
FT A2
t;30 - 3:00
3/21/91
91-3004
1.7
1.9
9.5
. 34. 5
10.2
55.3
.69
13,283
14,791
73.7
4.9
1.5
7.01
*
Grindability Index
% Chlorine
43
4i
•Oft: 411 results are on dry bails unless stated otherwise,
An*lyx*d by: Billie Hudson (SAV - 5086.3C)
Dete of Analysis: 4/29/91
S-Unit 2
Raw Coal
PT A-3
3:00 - 6:00
3/21/91
91-3005
S.O
2.5
7.4
34.9
11.1
53.3
.63
12,951
14,683
73.8
4.9
1.4
7.47
42
110
-------
}•*•! 2-28-90
SHAWNEE UNIT 6
REPORT Of ANALYSIS - CDAL MMLTSIS REPORT
TtlfMESSEg WU1£Y AUTHDfilTY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CMATTAWOOGA POWER SERVICE COfTER
Sampl* Idntlty
S. Unit 6
Tast I
S. Unit 6
Twt 2
S. Unit 6
T«t 5
S. Unit 6
T«st M
S. Unit 6
Test BB
Etet*
L*6or«nx> Mo.
II r Dry Nslstym
teidkMl foisturv
Total
12-9-89
90-1225
I.S
iHtB Analysis
f Voiatlla Ptatt«r
12-5-89
90-1224
1.7
12-6-89
W-I23S
2.1
\ QilorlM
OTEt All rtMuItt af» on dry ba*f« unla«s rt»t»d otfwmli
I2-7-49
90-1226
i.l
.2-7-89
90-1227
I.S
f Ash 12. 8
1 FlMtd Carbon
S Total Sulfur .70
•tu/lb
A* R*o.iy«d
A and*
HtlMfa Analysis
1 Carbon 74.4
flknJi ii.ri t T
in/oruyan «./
SNitragw 1.4
% Oxyvan 6.00
onw of S
f Sulfat*
f Organic
S Total
13.1 13.8
.67 .70
74.6 72.3
4.7 4.7
1.4 1.3
9.93 7.20
14.7
.67
73,3
4.9
1.3
9.93
15.8
.70
72.7
4.4
1.3
9.10
tal*
byi KH-ASG COB82U
i 2-17-90
111
-------
Data: 2-28-90
SHAWNEE UNIT 6
Sanpla Idantlty
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TENNESSEE VALLfY AUTHORITY
COfTRAl. LABORATORIES - CHATTAMOQSA PO«R SERVICE COTTER
Shawfl*a
S. Unit 6
T«t 0
S. Unit 6
T«t E
S. Unit 6
Twt F
S. Unit 6
Tas t 6
S. Unit 6
T«t H
Oat*
Laboratory No.
Air Dry Moistur*
IteiduAl Holstun
Total felstur*
iMtw Analysis
% Volatlla Nattwr
1 Ath
f Flx*d Carbon
f Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
Ac Rataaiv^
Dry
A and If
Ultlnat* Analysis
f Carbon
S HyqYooan
f Nltraoan
» Oxyoan
Form of S
f Sulfa*
% PyrJtle
f Organic
% Total
Srlnaablllty Indm
% Chloriiw
NOTEi All nasults
12-6-59
90-1228
1.6
13.6
.70
124-89
90-1229
2.4
13.7
.68
12-4-89
90-1230
2.1
12-7-89
90-1231
2.1
12-7-89
90-1232
2.1
15.1
.64
16.0
.64
»5.7
.65
72.7
4.S
1.5
6.90
71.7
4.7
1,3
5.92
73.0
4.9
1.2
S.56
72.1
4.6
• I.S
5.36
72.4
4.6
1.3
5.39
an* on oVy ball unl«*s fhrt»d
Analyzwl by: BCH-AS6 (OB82U
Data Analyxad: 2-27-90
112
eCH:RM1
-------
Date; 3-5-90
SHAWNEE UNIT 8
REPORT OF ANALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
TEtroiSSEE VALLEY AUTHQEITY
CESTiAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAifOOGA POWER SERVICE CEHTBfi
«. Unit 8
Coal Feeders
4
12-12-89
90-1313
2.2
f. Unit 8
Co»l Feeders
A-l
12-1,-89
10-1314
3.1
ft. Unit 8
Coal Feeders
B
12-12-89
90-131S
2.0
10.9
.60
12.9
.71
9.S
.12
SampU Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Mr Dry Moisture
Residual. Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
* Volatile Matter
% Ash
% Fixed Carbon
% total Sulfur
Btu/lb
As Received
Dry
A and MF
Ultiaate Analysis
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% irltrogen
% Oxygen
Fonts of S
% Sulfate
* Pyritle
% Organic
% Total
Crindabiiity Index
% Chlorina
HOTB: All results.are on dry basic unless stated otherwise.
Analyzed by: BCK/ASC (0901U)
I. Unit 8
Coal Feeders
12-14-Sf
90-13W
3.2
12.6
.70
73.4
4.6
1.4
9.10
72.7
4.S
1.4
7.79
74.7
4.1
1.4
8.68
73.4
4.5
1.5
7,30
113
BOUBMM
-------
Date; 3-5-90
Page 2 of 2
SHAWNEE UNIT 8
REPORT OF MALYSIS - COM. AHALYSIS REPORT
TianaissEg VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER SERVICE CENTER
Sample Identity
S. Unit 8
Coal Feeder
S. Unit 8
Coal Feeder
12-12-89
90-1317
l.B
9.8
.62
74.1
4.8
1.5
a.58
12-12-89
90-1318
2.0
9.8
.69
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Hatter
I A*h
% Fixed Cartoon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/Lb
A* Received
Dry
A and KP
Ultimate Analysis
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
* nitrogen
* Oxygen
Forma of S
% SuLfate
* Pyritie
% Organic
% Total
Crindabllity index
% Chlorine
MOTE; All retultijkre on dry basic unlesa atated otherviae.
Analyzed bys BCH/ASC (0901L)
74.ft
4.9
l.S
8.51
114
-------
Data: 5/18/90
WIDOWS CREEK UNIT 7
OF
- COAL ANALYSIS REPORT
SaopU Identity
Data Sampled
Laboratory lo.
Air Dry Hoiatur*
•aaldual Boiatura
Total Holstura
Proxim»t« Anaiysl*
% Volatile (Utter
% AJh
% Pix«4 Carbon .
% Total Sulfur
Bfcu/lb
A< ••e«iv*d
Bry
A and MF
tnmissBB VALUE! AUTHORITY
CBTTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTAMOOCA POtflS SgRVICg CUTER
Widows Creak Staaa Plank
Unit ?
4/5/90
90-3045
7,2
1.5
8.6
16.1
3.S?
12,308
14,ill
68.7
4.6
l.S
5.23
1 Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Vitrot«n
% Oxygan
foraa of S
% Sulf ttt
% Pyrltlc
% Orsanle
% Total
Crindabillty Indue
% Chlorine
BOTEi All r«culta ara on Aey baalf imlau atabod otnanriaa.
*•».
Data of Analyalat 5/14/90
Analycad by: Bllli* C. Hudjon/A. Scott Gary/Bary I. Card (1498S)
SWH
its
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before computing/
i. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/R-92-242
3, RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4, TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Evaluation of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Data from
TVA Coal-Fired Boilers
5. REPORT DATE
December 1992
'6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHQR(S)
Susan StameyHall
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
DCN No. 92-239-022-02-06
9, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
Radian Corporation
P. O. Box 13000
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-Dl-0013, Task 002
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Task Final] 6/91- 7/92
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
m SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES AEERL project officer is Julian W. Jones, Mail Drop 62, 919 /
541-2489.
IB. ABSTRACT The report gives results of a study during which nitrogen oxide (NOx) emis-
sion rates from 30 boilers at 11 TVA coal-fired plants were calculated and compared
with the calculated rate for each boiler type using EPA emission factors (AP-42).
Current AP-42 emission factors for NOx from utility coal-fired boilers do not
account for variations in either emissions as a function of generating unit load, or
designs of boilers of the same general type, particularly wall-fired boilers. TVA
recently compiled short-term NOx emissions data from 30 units at 11 TVA coal-fired
plants. These units include cyclone, cell-burner, single-wall, opposed-wall, single-
tangential, and twin-tangential boiler firing designs. Additional recent NOx data
(from non-TVA boilers) were also obtained from the literature, along with the data
used to develop the current AP-42 emission factors. Analysis of these data indicates
that: (1) to varying degrees, NOx emissions increase with increasing load for all but
single- and opposed-wall-fired boilers; (2) using the current AP-42 quality rating
scheme for each of the six boiler types, factoring in the TVA and recent literature
data results in improved quality ratings for all NOx emission factors; and (3) there
was no evident relationship between NOx emissions and fuel nitrogen content or fuel
ratio (fixed carbon to volatile matter).
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
Pollution
Nitrogen Oxides
Emission
Boilers
Coal
Combustion
18, DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Emission Factors
19, SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
2O. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COSATI Field/Group
13 B
07B
14G
ISA
21D
2 IB
21. NO, OF PAGES
122
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-731
116
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Research and Development
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati. Ohio 4526B
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, S3OO
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
If your address is incorrect, please change on the above label
teat oft; and return to the above address.
If you do not desire to continue receiving these technical
reports. CHfCK HfK Q; tear off label, and return it to the
above address.
Publication No. EPA- eoo/R-92-242
-------
EPA-600/R-92-242
December 1992
EVALUATION OF NITROGEN
OXIDE EMISSIONS DATA
FROM TVA COAL-FIRED BOILERS
by
Susan Stamey-Hall
Radian Corporation
Post Office Box13000
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
EPA Contract No. 68-D1-0031
Work Assignment No. 002
Project Officer: Julian W. Jones
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
„*-,
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF NO. EMISSIONS DATA FOR CELL BURNER UNITS
ID'
C
D
D
E9
E9
L3
E10
E10
Average
Emission
10 Factor
Plant
Cumberland
Cumberland
Cumberland
Four Comers
Four Comers
Four Corners
Harlee Branch
Harlee Branch
Unit No,
1
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
Capacity, MW
1300
1300
1300
800
800
800
480
480
Average Test
Load, %
78
95
100
75
95
100
83
100
Average NO,,
Ib/mBtu
1.7
1,5
1,4
1.08
1,09
1,27
0.71
0.95
1,21
33
% Difference
AP-42" Average - AP-42
0.78
0.78
0,78
0.78
0,78
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.78
21
118
92
79
38
40
63
-9
22
-55.
55
'Letters C and D «• TVA units; E « units identified through AP-42 references; and L = units identified through the literature search.
"Calculated by using 13,500 Btu/lb.
-------
N)
Nl
I.O
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
2 LI
CQ ,
E 1
g 0.9
* 0.8
i 0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
n
-
-
78%
95%
100%
75%
95%
|AP-42 = 0.78
100%
i
1 83%
100%
D
D E9 E9 L3 E10 E10
Unit
Figure 3. NOx emissions, cell-burner wall-fired units.
-------
TABLE 4, BOILER POPULATION FROM CURRENT AP-42 REFERENCE LIST
AND LITERATURE SEARCH
ID"
El
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
L1
L2
dD
dp
C^
^**"ir-ini ii r—**^
L4
L5
E11
E12
E13
Plant
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Unidentified
Niles
Nelson Dewey
) Four Corners"
Four Comers'1
Hariee Branch
Crist
Hammond
Widows Creek*
Widows Creek"
CHst
Unit
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
4
4
3
7
4
5
6
6
Boiler
Mfgr.
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
B&W
FW
FW
B&W
B&W
FW
Capacity
MW
206
Unknown
200
Unknown
240
704
Unknown
300
108
100
800 H
800
480
500
500
125
125
320
AP-42 Major
Category
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cydone
Cyclone
Cydone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Cyclone
Wall
Wail
Wall
Wall
Wall
Wall
Wail
Wall
Subclass
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
WA
N/A
Cell
Cell
Ceil
Opposed
Opposed
Single
Single
Single
Coal Type
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Bituminous
Bituminous
Subbiturninous
SubbNuminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Reference
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
*
-------
TABLE 4, BOILER POPULATION FROM CURRENT AP-42 REFERENCE LIST
AND LITERATURE SEARCH (CONTINUED)
ID»
E14
E15
L6
E16
E17
E1B
E19
E20
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
E21
£22
L12
Plant
E.D. Edwards
Dave Johnson
Edge water
Comanehe1'
Naughton
Barry*
Barry
Dave Johnson
Smith
Hunter
Lawrence
Cherokee
Valmont
Barry
Navajo"
Kingston
Unit
No.
2
2
4
1
3
2
4
4
2
2
5
4
5
3
2
6
Boiler
Mfgr.
RS
B&W
B&W
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
Capacity
MW
256
105
105
350
330
130
350
340
180
400
400
350
165
250
800
200
AP-42 Major
Category
Wall
Wall
Wall
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Tangential
Subclass
Single
Single
Single
Single Fymace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Single Furnace
Twin Furnace
Twin Furnace
Twin Furnace
Coal Type
Bituminous
Subbrtuminous
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Bituminous
Subbituminous
Bituminous
Reference
6
6
to
6
6
6
6
6
11
12
13
14
14
6
6
15
*E - units Identified through AP-42 references, L - units identified through the literature search.
"identified in both the AP-42 reference list and In the literature search.
TVA boiler.
-Unit Is equipped with overfire air ports for NO, control. Data from baseline operation (i.e., normal firing with
overfire air ports closed) were used in the analysis.
-------
SECTION 7
REFERENCES
1 . Offtet of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Compilation of Air Pollution
Emission Factors, Volume 1 : Stationary Point and Area Sources, AP-42,
Fourth Edition (GPO 055-000-00251-7). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 1985 [supplemented
October 1986 (GPO 055-000-00265-7) and September 1988 (GPO 055-000-
00278-9}), pp 1.1-1 -1.1-17.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 60,
Appendix A, Methods 3A and 7E, 7-1-89 Edition,
3. Ctvrtnicek, T,E,, and S.J. Rusek. Applicability of NQM Combustion Modifications
to Cyclone Boilers (Furnaces). EPA-600/7-77-006 (NTIS PB263-960), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
January 1977.
4. Booth, R.C., R.E. Hall, R.A. Lott, A. Kokkinos, D.F. Gyorke, S. Durrani, HJ.
Johnson, J.J., Kienle, R.W. Borio, R.D. Lewis, and M.B. Keough. Reburn
Technology for NO, Control on a Cyclone-Fired Boiler, in Proceedings: 1991
Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447,
Volume I.
5. Yagiela, A.S., G.J. Maringo, R.J. Newell, and H. Farzan. Update on Coal
Rebuming Technology for Reducing NO, in Cyclone Boilers. In Proceedings:
1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447,
Volume I.
6. Crawford, A.R., E.H. Manny, and W. Bartok. Control of Utility Boiler and Gas Four
Turbine Pollutant Emissions by Combustion Modification - Phase I. EPA-60Q/7-
78-036a (NTIS PB281-078), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina. March 1978.
7. Vatsky, J., and T.W. Sweeney. Development of an Ultra-Low NO, Pulverized
Coal Burner. In Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary
Combustion NO, Control, EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
49
-------
8. Sawyer, J.W., and E.B. Higginbotham. Combustion Modification NO, Controls
for Utility Boilers. Volume II: Pulverized-Coal Wall-Fired Unit Field Test, EPA-
600/7-81-124b (NTIS PB82-227273), July 1981.
9. Wilson, S.M., J.N. Sorge, L.L Smith, and LL Larsen. Demonstration of Low
NOf Combustion Control Technologies on a 500 MWe Coal Fired Utility Boiler.
In Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NOX Control,
EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
10. LaRue, A.D. The XCL Burner - Latest Developments and Operating
Experience. In Proceedings: 1989 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion
NO, Control, Volume I, EPA-600/9-89/062a (NTIS PB89-220529), June 1989.
11. Hardman, R.R., S.M. Wilson, and J.D. McDonald. Advanced Tangentially-Fired
Combustion Techniques for the Reduction of Nitrogen Oxide (NO,) Emissions
from Coal-Fired Boilers. Presented at the Eighth Annual International
Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October 14-18, 1991.
12. Kokkinos, A., and R.D. Lewis. Field Evaluation of a Low-NO,, Firing System for
Tangentially Coal-Fired Utility Boilers. EPA-600/7-85-018 (NTIS PB85-201093),
May 1985.
13. Thompson, R.E., G.H. Shiomoto, D.E. Shore, M.D. McDannel, and D. Eskinazi.
NO, Emissions Results for a Low-NOx PM Burner Retrofit. In Proceedings:
1989 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control, Volume 1, EPA-
600/9-89/062a (NTIS PB89-220529), June 1989.
14. Hunt, T.G., R.R. Hawley, R.C. Booth, and B.P. Breen. Retrofit Experience
Using LNCFS on 350 MW and 165 MW Coal-Fired Tangential Boilers. In
Proceedings: 1991 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO, Control,
EPRI GS-7447, Volume I.
/
15. Higginbotham, E.B., and P.M. Goldberg. Combustion Modification NO, Controls
for Utility Boilers: Volume 1. Tangential Coal-Fired Unit Field Test. EPA-
600/7-81-124a (NTIS PB82-227265), July 1981.
16. How Fuel Quality Affects NOX Formation - and CAA Compliance. Power
Magazine, July 1991, Volume No. 135, No. 7, p. 54-56, 81.
50
-------
CUMBERLAND UNIT 1
RESULTS
The results of the testing ate AS follows:
^noTJp
HME
PEWOD
1X00-1215
I3US-1230
1230-1245
1245-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
LOAD
1020
1016
1015
1015
1015
1030
1015
1010
BOILER
O2
6.3
6.6
6.4
6.5
6.5
6.7
6.5
6.7
VAN
J|02
PRY
8.0
8.2
8.3
8.3
8,2
8.3
8.4
8.4
VAN
NO, PPM
3* O2
1156
1157
1152
1145
1125
1124
1133
1120
VAN
NO
LB/MBTU
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
QRM.
\02
DRY
8.1
7.3
8.1
7.3
8.1
8.1
8,1
8.1
CEM
NO.fPM
DRY
855
848
833
805
855
900
809
855
CEM
jfp
LB/MBTU
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
AVERAGE
1015
6.5
8.3 1140
7.9 845
1.2
6/27/89^
TIME
PERIOD
1200-1215
1215-1230
1245-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1345-1400
« 400-1415
\15-1430
J30-1445
AVERAGE
LOAD
1Q1LE1
O2
1223
1235
1235
1236
1230
"4
4
4
4
4
.2
.2
.2
.0
.2
VAN
*02
PPY
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.7
VAN
NO. PPM
3* 02
1012
1003
1106
1051
1030
1055
1064
1066
1065
1050
VAN
NO
CEJ1
XO2
LB/MBTU D1Y
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
/If
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
— 3-^
6.1
6.1
6.5
6.5
6.3
CEM
CEM
NO* PPM NO
3* 02
935
935
961
921
938
LB/MBTU
1
1
1
1
1
.3
.3
.4
.3
.3
63
-------
CUMBERLAND UNIT 2
UNIT 2J
6/29/89
TIME
PERIOD
945-1000
1000-1015
1015-1030
1100-1115
1115-1130
1245-1300
1300-1315
1315-1330
1330-1345
1345-1400
1415-1430
1430-1445
1445-1500
1500-1515
1515-1530
1530-1545
AVERAGES
LOAD
1285
1290
1294
1292
1292
1294
1293
1298
1294
1298
1309
1302
1293
1293
1293
1281
1295
BOILER
O2
4.4
4.4
4.3
4,1
4.1
3.7
3.6
3.4
3.6
3.4
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.2
4.7
4.0
VAN
*O2
PPY
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.4
6.3
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.5
6.0
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.6
6.1
VAN
NO. PPM
3* 02
1021
1003
972
1052
1019
989
1011
1009
996
989
1014
1016
1004
995
987
980
1005 f
VAN
NO
LB/MBTU
1.5
1,4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
-""fTT^
CEM
^02
J5RY
6.7
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6,2
6.5
6.5
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.5
CEM
NO. PPM
3% O2
894
921
921
902
941
941
902
902
902
1001
974
974
934
934
934
932
CEM
NO
LB/MBTU
1.3
1.3
1.3
1 .3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1 .5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
CONCLUSIONS:
The conclusions from the NOx testing are as follows:
1. CEM and Van correlated well for Unit 2; however, CEM reads appro
imately 0.5 Ib/mbtu lower than the Van for Unit 1.
2. At reduced load (1240 MW) on Unit 2, NOx emissions were slightly
higher than at full load. This is probably due to the higher boiler <
levels at reduced load. ;
3. At reduced load (1015 MW) on Unit 1, NOx emissions were high.
Again, this is probably due to the extremely high boiler O2 levels. '
4. Reducing boiler O2 on Unit 2 from 4.4 to 3.6 X showed slight I
reduction of NOx. However, on a unit of this size with so many other*
operational factors to be considered, it nay be difficult to see a '
significant reduction in NOx when boiler O2 is reduced.
64
-------
August 14, 1989
CUMBERLAND UNITS 1 AND 2
E1PORT OF AMALYSIS - COAL ANALYSIS BEPOlf
ygmiEssge VALLEY AUTHORITY
CBHT1AL LABQEATORIES - CHATTAtfOOCA POWER SflVICf CESTEH
Simple Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory lo.
Air Dry Moisture
Hesldual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proximate Analysis
% Volatile Hatter
% Ash
% fixed Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lfc
AM Becelved
Dry
A and MF
Ultimate Analysis
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% nitrogen
% Oxygen
Forms of S
% Sulfate
% Pyrltlc
% Organic
% Total
STOCK
Unit 2
PL-351-BuS
2nd Shift
6/30/89
89-3317
2.8
10.8
9.6
49.6
3.2F
13*095
14,480
73.0
S.2
1.6
7.33
EHISSIOH TEST -
Unit 2
PL-3S2-BuS
3rd Shift
6/30/89
89-3318
3.5
39.8
9.9
50,3
3.04
13.056
14,498
73.1
5.2
1.6
7.14
CUmSILAHD FOSSIL PLAHT
(^itT)
FL-360
2nd Shift
7/7/89
89-3319
3.4
40.2
9.8
50.0
3.1?
s**— ~~~
(u^O
14,489
73.1
5.1
1.6
7.13
Crlndabillty Index
% Chlorine
.12
,12
,12
ti
t
VOTE: All results are on dry basis unless stated otherwise.
102
-------
Da
te:
August 14, 1989
CUMBERLAND UNIT 2
REPORT OF AHALYSIS - COAL AMALYSIS REPORT
TEHKESSES VALLEY AUTHORITY
CENTRAL LABORATORIES - CHATTANOOGA POWER
Sample Identity
Date Sampled
Laboratory Ho.
Air Dry Moisture
Residual Moisture
Total Moisture
Proxiaate Analysis
% Volatile Matter
% Ash
% Fixed Carbon
% Total Sulfur
Btu/lb
As Received
Dry
A and HP
Ultimata Analysis
% Carbon
t Hydrogen
% Hitrogen
% Oxygen
Forms of S
I Sulfate
% Pyritie
% Organic
% Total
STOCK
Unit 2
PL-344-BuS
2nd Shift
6/27/89
89-3312
^
2.4
40.6
9.4
50.0
3.17
x-—--^^
(13,016*)
i*7**r
73.3
5.2
1.6
7.33
EMISSION TEST
Unit 2
PL-345-BuS
2nd Shift
6/2B/89
89-3313
2.3
40.9
9.2
49.9
3.10
13,190
14,529
73.5
5.3
1.6
7.30
SERVICE CENTER
- CUKBERLAin) FOSSIL PLANT
Unit 2
FL-346-BuS
3rd Shift
6/28/89
89-3314
2.3
40.7
9.2
50.1
3.14
13,187
14,525
73.7
5.3
1.6
7.06
Unit 2
PL-348-BuS-
2nd Shift
6/29/89
89-3315
2.6
40.5
10.0
49.5
3.25
13,089
14,537
73.0
5.2
1.6
6.95 .
Crlndabllity Indax
% Chlorine
BOTB: All rasulta
.12 .11 .11
oa dry basis unless stated otherwise.
.12
Unit 2
PL-349-BuS
3rd Shift
6/29/89
89-3316
2.5
40.6
9.8
49.6
3.25
13,037
14,461
72.7
5.2
1.6
7.45
.12
Analysed by: Billie Hudson/Robert Brannan (3S93C)
103
------- |