UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
GUIDANCE FROM HOTLINE COMPENDIUM
WSGH15
Date Issued: October 1988
SUBJECT: Determination of MCLGs and MCLs
SOURCE: Jennifer Orme
How does the EPA establish the MCLG and MCL for a particular contaminant? More
specifically, what level or range of health risk is considered when establishing the two levels?
Response:
An MCLG is a maximum contaminant level goal, which is an aspirational goal. An
MCLG indicates the ideal level of protection that can be provided against any adverse
health effects that may be experienced after exposure to a given contaminant through
drinking water. The EPA determines a level for each contaminant, which is considered
an "acceptable level of risk" for all members of the population.
These levels will vary according to the health effects associated with each contaminant.
For non-carcinogenic contaminants, the MCLG is based on the Agency Verified
Reference Dose, adjusted for drinking water exposure. For known or probable
carcinogens, there is no threshold level that is considered "acceptable." Upon direction
from Congress, the EPA set MCLGs for carcinogens at "zero."
The EPA also establishes a maximum contaminant level (MCL) or specifies a treatment
technique for each contaminant.
Unlike the MCLG, the MCL is an enforceable regulation that the EPA considers
practically and feasibly attainable; the MCL must be maintained by the PWS. In many
cases, such as the non-carcinogenic contaminants, the MCL is equivalent to the MCLG,
because the EPA believes that the PWS can provide this level of protection. For
carcinogenic contaminants, however, the Agency realizes that it is most likely impossible
to completely eliminate the contaminant and does not set an MCL at "zero." Rather, the
EPA sets a level that can be attained, given available technology and resources. The
level usually falls into the excess cancer risk range of 1 in 10,000 (10"4) to 1 in 1,000,000
NOTE: This response slightly differs from the version published in the October, 1988
Monthly Report. The Office of Drinking Water determined a need to re-evaluate the
original response.
------- |