Section 319
              NONPOINT SOURCE  PROGRAM  SOGGESS STORY
 Implementing Best Management Practices Reduces Bacteria Levels

 in the Allen Creek Watershed
WaterbodieS Improved    NonP°int source pollution generated from cattle grazing
                                  and stream access activities resulted in high levels of
 bacteria in Kansas' Allen, Dows, and Stillman creeks. In 1998 the Kansas Department of
 Health and Environment (KDHE) added two segments of the main stem of Allen Creek and
 two Allen Creek tributaries, Dows Creek and Stillman Creek, to the state's Clean Water
 Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for bacteria.  Landowners cooperated
 with local, state, and federal agencies to implement best management practices (BMPs)
 in the watershed. Water quality monitoring since 2003 indicates that Allen Creek and its
 tributaries now meet the water quality standards for bacteria. As a result, KDHE removed
 all four segments from the state's list of impaired waters  in 2012.
 Problem
 Allen Creek originates in north-central Lyon County
 and flows south for 31 stream miles until it merges
 with its tributaries and empties into the Neosho
 River in east-central Kansas. The Allen Creek
 watershed is part of the 421,946-acre Neosho
 Headwaters watershed (Figure 1).

 The Allen Creek watershed is predominately
 grassland (68 percent), which is used for grazing
 cattle. Another 20 percent of the watershed is
 composed of cropland. The remaining 12 percent
 of land includes woodlands, water, and other uses.
 Allen, Dows, and Stillman creeks are designated as
 primary recreation use Class C waters, indicating
 that the public is restricted by private property from
 accessing the streams for swimming and other full-
 body-contact recreation.

 Water quality monitoring data collected since 1991
 by  KDHE indicated that Allen Creek exceeded
 the state's bacteria criterion of 200 fecal coliform
 colony-forming units (CPU) per 100 milliliters (ml).
 As  a result, KDHE added two segments of Allen
 Creek, along with Dows Creek and Stillman Creek,
 to the state's 1998 CWA section 303(d) list of
 impaired waters for bacteria. In 2003 the basis for
 the bacteria standard changed from fecal coliform
 to Escherichia coli. In addition, the basis for deter-
 mining a violation of state standards for waterbod-
                          Neosho Headwaters
                          Watershed
                                     Dsage
 A
  Legend
  	Dellsted Stream Segments (4)
   • Monitoring Site SC628
  1^5 Livestock BMPs
    Cropland BMPs
Figure 1. Allen, Dows, and Stillman creeks are in Kansas'
Neosho Headwaters watershed.
ies designated as primary recreation use Class C
waters became five samples collected within
30 days exceeding the geometric mean of 427
CFU/100 ml. A total maximum daily load (TMDL)
for Allen Creek and its tributaries was developed
and approved in 2002 to direct efforts to reduce
the bacteria impairments in the watershed. The
TMDL identified small, unregulated livestock oper-
ations and rural homesteads along the streams as
potential nonpoint sources of bacteria loading.

-------
Figure 2. Partners installed numerous BMPs, including
streambank protection project on Dows Creek.
       Project Highlights
       Following the U.S. Environmental Protection
       Agency's (EPA's) approval of the TMDL in 2002,
       the Lyon County Conservation District, the U.S.
       Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources
       Conservation  Service (NRCS), local landowners, and
       Neosho Headwaters Watershed Restoration and
       Protection Strategy (WRAPS)  partners implemented
       agricultural and livestock BMPs throughout the
       Allen Creek watershed. They installed 586 acres of
       access control and streambank protection;  added
       2 acres of critical planting to reduce runoff into the
       creeks; installed 4,168 feet of fence; added 2 acres
       of filter strips  (dense grass sod strips that serve as
       a border around cropland, which can filter pollutants
       in agricultural runoff); built 4,507 feet of pipeline to
       facilitate alternative watering systems; constructed
       a pond; and implemented 750 acres of prescribed
       grazing (Figure 2).
       Results
       KDHE completed sampling on Allen Creek on a
       rotational schedule; sampling occurred during the
       primary recreational seasons in 2003, 2007, and
       2011. Water quality samples  showed that E. coli
       levels were below the state's criterion of 427
       CFU/100 ml  in all but four cases (Figure 3). In addi-
       tion to the rotational scheduled monitoring, inten-
Allen Creek £ Co// Bacteria during Primary Recreation Season
1000 1 — I— I— I— 1— 1— 1 	 1— j — 4 — 4 — 1.— 1. — 1.— I.-- 1 	 1— 1— 1— -1 — 4 — I — 4— I— •-
a (CFU/100 ml)


::

-*
-




::








|WQS = 427CFU/100mL|
































































--









•
•*
c








,


























































































₯



—

f
"I

•*ri

A
•
•:
Date





(•Samples ^— WQS A Geometric Means |







Figure 3. £. co// bacteria values during primary recreation
season for Allen, Dows, and Stillman creeks.
sive monitoring occurred on four occasions in both
2007 and 2011. In all cases, the geometric means
remained below the criterion value. As a result of
the water quality samples meeting the criterion,
KDHE removed Dows Creek (26.5 miles), Stillman
Creek (9.5 miles), and two segments of Allen Creek
(totaling 31 miles) from the state's list of impaired
waters in 2012.
Partners and Funding
The success of the delisting and water qual-
ity improvements can be attributed to several
local, state, and federal partners, including the
Neosho Headwaters WRAPS, Flint Hills Resource
Conservation and Development Council, Kansas
Forest Service, Kansas Department of Agriculture's
Division of Conservation, Kansas Water Office,
Kansas Water Authority, NRCS, Lyon County
Conservation District, Kansas Department of Health
and Environment, Kansas Rural Center, Kansas
State University, EPA Region 7, and participating
landowners.

The project was supported  by CWA section 319
funds ($130,000 for assessment and planning
and $267,950 for implementation), as well as
additional support from the Kansas Department of
Agriculture's Division of Conservation,  NRCS, and
local landowners.
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Office of Water
            Washington, DC

            EPA841-F-14-001LL
            July2014
For additional information contact:
Ann D'Alfonso
Kansas Bureau of Water
785-296-3015 • AD'Afonso@kdheks.gov

-------