Background Report Refeence
AP-42 Section Number: 10.6.1
Background Report Section: 4
Reference Number: 92
Title: Air Emissions Diagnostic Test
Report for Louisiana Pacific
Corporation, Dungannon, V A,
July 27-28,1995
ETS, Inc.
August 1995
-------
AIR EMISSIONS DIAGNOSTIC TEST REPORT
FOR
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
DUNGAWNON, VIRGINIA
TEST DATES: JULY 27 - 28, 1995
REPORT DATE: AUGUST 29, 1995
ETS, INC.
A subsidiary of ETS International, Inc.
ETS, Inc.
1401 Municipal Road, N. W.
Roanoke, VA 24012
540-265-0004
540-265-013 If ax
Air Compliance Division
1635-A Bustleton Pike
Feastervitte, PA 19053
215-364-8940
215-364-4596 fax
Pollution Control Consultants
Specializing In
Toxic Emission Measurement and Control
ETS CONTRACT NO. 95-553-T
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 OBJECTIVE 1
1.3 TEST PROGRAM 1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2
3.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION 2
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 2
4.1 SAMPLING PROCEDURES 8
4.1.1 SAMPLING POINT DETERMINATION
EPA METHOD 1 8
4.1.2 VOLUMETRIC MEASUREMENTS - EPA METHOD 2 10
4.1.3 MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
EPA METHOD 3 AND 3A 10
4.1.3.1 MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION -
EPA METHOD 3 . 10
4.1.3.2 MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION -
EPA METHOD 3A 11
4.1.4 FLUE GAS MOISTURE CONTENT - EPA METHOD 4 11
4.1.5 FARTICULATE SAMPLING 13
4.1.5.1 SAMPLING TRAIN DESCRIPTION . . 13
4.1.5.2 SAMPLING TRAIN OPERATION ... 15
4.1.5.3 SAMPLE RECOVERY AND CLEAN-UP . 15
4.1.5.4 BLANKS 16
4.1.6 FORMALDEHYDE DETERMINATION - BIF
METHOD 0011 16
4.1.6.1 SAMPLING TRAIN DESCRIPTION . . 16
4.1.6.2 SAMPLING TRAIN OPERATION ... 18
4.1.6.3 SAMPLE RECOVERY AND CLEAN-UP , 18
4.1.6.4 SAMPLE STORAGE AND TRANSPORT . 19
4.1.6.5 BLANKS 19
4.1.7 METHYLENE BISPHENYL ISOCYANATE (MDI)
SAMPLING - DRAFT EPA MACT METHOD .... 20
4.1.7,1 SAMPLING TRAIN DESCRIPTION . . 20
4.1.7.2 SAMPLING TRAIN OPERATION ... 22
4.1.7.3 SAMPLE RECOVERY AND CLEAN-UP . 22
4.1.7.4 SAMPLE STORAGE AND TRANSPORT . 24
4.1.7.5 FIELD BLANKS . . 24
4.1.8 CONTINUOUS MONITORING FOR SO2, NOX, CO,
THC, O2, AND C02 - INSTRUMENTAL METHODS 24
4.1.8.1 SAMPLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION . . 25
4.1.8.2 DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM .... 27
4.1.8.3 DRY SYSTEM CALIBRATION .... 27
4.1.8.4 WET SYSTEM CALIBRATION .... 28
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS fCONTINUED^
' . PAGE
4.2 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 23
4.2.1 MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION - EPA
METHODS 3A 29
4.2,2 MOISTURE CONTENT - EPA METHOD 4 .... 29
4,2,3 PARTICULATE ANALYSES - EPA METHOD 5
AND 202 . 30
4.2.4 FORMALDEHYDE ANALYSES 31
4.2.5 METHYLENE BISPHENYL ISOCYANATE (MDI)
ANALYSES 31
5.0 DATA ANALYSIS 32
6.0 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 32
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF AVERAGE EMISSIONS - 3
TABLE 2 - SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS 4
TABLE 3 - SUMMARY OF FORMALDEHYDE EMISSIONS . 5
TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF MDI EMISSIONS . 6
TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF S02, NOX, CO, AND VOC EMISSIONS . . 7
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - SAMPLING AND TRAVERSE POINTS FOR RTO STACK . . 9
FIGURE 2 - EPA METHOD 3 SAMPLING TRAIN 12
FIGURE 3 - EPA METHOD 5/202 SAMPLING TRAIN 14
FIGURE 4 - BIF METHOD 0011 SAMPLING TRAIN '17
FIGURE 5 - SAMPLING TRAIN FOR MDI 21
FIGURE 6 - CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEM FOR EPA METHODS 3A,
6C, 7E, 10, AND 25A . 26
ii
-------
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - TEST LOG
APPENDIX B - DATA AND RESULTS FOR EPA METHOD 5/202 'TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX C - DATA AND RESULTS FOR BIF METHOD 0011 TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX D - DATA AND RESULTS FOR MDI TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX E - DATA AND RESULTS FOR EPA METHODS 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, AND
25A TESTING - RTO STACK
APPENDIX F - CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G - RAW FIELD DATA FOR EPA METHOD 5/202 TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX H - RAW FIELD DATA BIF METHOD 0011 TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX I - RAW FIELD DATA FOR MDI TESTING
RTO STACK
APPENDIX J - CEMS ANALYZER CALIBRATION DATA AND SAMPLING SYSTEM
CALIBRATION DRIFT DATA AND RESULTS
APPENDIX K - GRAVIMETRICS LABORATORY DATA
APPENDIX L - FORMALDEHYDE LABORATORY DATA
APPENDIX M - MDI LABORATORY DATA
APPENDIX N - FACILITY OPERATING DATA
APPENDIX O - FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS
iii
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1«1 Background; An air emissions testing program was conducted
at Louisiana Pacific located in Dungannon, Virginia. The test
program was conducted on July 27 - 28, 1995 by ETS, Incorporated
(ETS) of Roanoke, Virginia. ETS personnel participating in the
test program were Andy Hetz, Jeff Smith, Ross Roberson, and Troy
Pryor. Project coordination was provided by Mickey Mullins and
Scott Ziesenis of Louisiana Pacific.
1.2 objective; The purpose of the test program was to evaluate
the performance of the Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) with
respect to emissions limits contained in a VDEQ permit.
1.3 Test Program: The test program consisted of performing
three valid measurements for total suspended and condensible
particulate, formaldehyde, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI),
oxygen (02) , carbon dioxide (CO2) , sulfur dioxide (S02), oxides of
nitrogen (NO^) , and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at the RTO
stack. A fourth run was conducted for carbon monoxide (CO) at
Louisiana Pacific's request. Gas temperature, moisture content,
molecular weight, gas velocity, and volumetric flow rate were
measured concurrently with each test. The testing was conducted
in accordance with the procedures of Appendix A of the Code of
pedera1 Regulationsf Title 40, Part 60, (40 CFR 60). Appendix A
contains a test log which provides the exact dates and times for
each of the tests.
-------
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Table 1 presents a summary of the average emissions. Tables
2, 3, and 4 summarize the results of the total particulate,
formaldehyde, and MDI testing conducted on the RTO stack,
respectively. Table 5 provides the results of the O2, C02, S02,
NO^, CO, and VOC testing. Appendices B through E provide more
detailed data and results for the analyses,
3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Three valid test runs were completed for the formaldehyde
testing on the RTO stack. Only the results of the third test run
are presented because the samples from the first two test runs
were accidentally destroyed by the laboratory. However, the
results from the third test run indicate that formaldehyde
emissions are significantly below the permitted limit.
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
All sampling and analytical procedures followed those
recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code of Federal Regulations
(40 CFR 60), or other methods generally accepted by the EPA and
the VDEQ. The following specific methods were used:
EPA Method I for determination of sampling and traverse
points;
EPA Method 2 for determination of flue gas velocity and
volumetric flow rate;
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE EMISSIONS
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
JULY 1995 DIAGNOSTIC TEST PROGRAM
RTO STACK
TEST
PARAMETER
Total Particulate
Formaldehyde*
Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate
NOx
S02
CO
VOC
REPORTING
UNITS
gr/dscf
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
AVERAGE
EMISSIONS
0.005
3.91
0.29
4.75E-06
10.90
1,05
20.32
2.07
EMISSIONS
LIMITATION
16.5
1.26
0.10
24.3
21.4
31.9
9.4
*0nly test run three was analyzed due to a laboratory error.
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
RUN I.D.
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
RTO-M5/202-R1
07/27/95
09:15
10:56
RTO-M5/202-R2 RTO-M5/202-R3
07/27/95 07/27/95
12:15 14:30 .
13:35 15:49
AVERAGE
SAMPLING PARAMETERS
Metered Volume - dcf
Corrected Volume - dscf
Total Test Time - min
% Isokinetics
53.455
48.350
72
100.3
53.751
47.974
72
100.7
52.702
46.492
72
99.6
53.303
47.605
72
100.2
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas Temperature -* F
Oxygen•%
Carbon Dioxide - %
Moisture - %
177
19.5
1.1
9.5
181
19.1
1.2
10.2
184
19.0
1.1
12.5
181
19.2
1.1
10.7
GAS FLOWRATE
Velocity - ft/sec
Actual Volume - acfm
Standard Volume - dscfm
47.73
143964
98803
47.83
144256
97616
48.19
145352
95607
47.92
144524
97342
SUSPENDED PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Cone. - gr/dscf 0.002
Mass Rate - Ib/hr 2.03
CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Cone. - gr/dscf 0.003
Mass Rate - Ib/hr 2.28
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Cone. - gr/dscf 0.005
Mass Rate - Ib/hr 4.31
0.002
1.91
0.002
1.85
0.004
3.76
0.003
2.34
0.002
1.33
0.004
3.67
0.003
2.09
0.002
1.82
0.005
3.91
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF FORMALDEHYDE EMISSIONS
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
RUN I.D. RTO-0011-R3
DATE 07/27/95
TIME STARTED 14:30
TIME ENDED 15:4i
SAMPLING PARAMETERS
Metered Volume - dcf 60.360
Corrected Volume - dscf 52,117
Total Test Time - min 72
% Isokinetics 102.8
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas Temperature -" F 183
Oxygen-% 19.0
Carbon Dioxide - % 1.1
Moisture-% 10.7
GAS FLOWRATE
Velocity - ft/sec 51.27
Actual Volume - acfm 154623
Standard Volume - dscfm 103849
FORMALDEHYDE EMISSIONS
Sample - mg 1.1
Blank - mg < 0.01
Corrected Sample - mg 1.1
Cone. - ppmdv -s. 0.60
Mass Rate - Ib/hr \ , 0.29
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF MDI EMISSIONS
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
RUN I.D.
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
RTO-MDI-R1
07/27/95
16:50
18:07
RTO-MDI-R2
7/28/95
11:45
13:05
RTO-MDI-R3
7/28/95
12:30
13:33
AVERAGE
SAMPLING PARAMETERS
Metered Volume«dcf
Corrected Volume • dscf
Total Test Time - min
% Isokinetics
46.142
39.389
60
99.1
48.913
43.043
60
103.6
48.532
42.761
60
103.6
47.862
41.731
60
102.1
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas Temperature -' F
Oxygen - %
Carbon Dioxide - %
Moisture - %
185
18.4
1.1
9.5
181
20.1
1.0
8.6
181
19.9
1.1
9.3
182
19.5
1.1
9.1
GAS FLOWRATE
Velocity - ft/sec
Actual Volume - acfm
Standard Volume - dscfm
47.76
144045
97743
49.07
147978
102154
49.14
148190
101509
48.65
146738
100469
MDI EMISSIONS
Sample - ug
Blank- ug
Corrected Sample - ug
Cone. - ppmdv
Mass Rate - Ib/hr
0.01
0.01
0.01
8.62E-07
3.28E-06
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 7.89E-07
< 3.14E-06
0.04
0.01
0.04
3.18E-06
1 .26E-05
0.02
0.01
0.02
1.21E-06
~4.75E-06
NOTE:
< = not detected In one or more laboratory samples
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF SO2, NOx. CO, AND VOC EMISSIONS
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
DUNGANNON, VA
JULY 1995
RUN I.D.
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
SAMPLING PARAMETERS
Total Test Time - min
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas Temperature - * F
Oxygen - %
Carbon Dioxide - %
Moisture - %
GAS FLOWRATE
Velocity - ft/sec
Actual Volume - acfm
Standard Volume - dscfm
NOx EMISSIONS fas NO2)
Concentration - ppmdv
Mass Rate - Ib/hr
S02 EMISSIONS
Concentration - ppmdv
Mass Rate - Ib/hr
CO EMISSIONS
Concentration - ppmdv
Mass Rale - Ib/hr
VOC EMISSIONS (as Propane)
Concentration - ppmwv
Concentration - ppmdv
Mass Rate - Ib/hr
RUN1*
07/27/95
09:15
10:15
RUN 2*
07/27/95
12:15
13:15
RUN 3"
07/27/95
14:30
15:30
RUN 4"
07/27/95
16:50
17:45
AVERAGE
60
49.47
149199
102571
13.65
10.03
1.74
1.78
28.19
12.61
3.45
3.81
2.68
60
49.35
148822
100837
16.21
11.71
1.26
1.27
46.40
20.41
1.87
2.08
1.44
60
55
49.73
149988
99728
15.34
10.96
0.10
0.10
75.02
32.63
2.68
3.03
2.08
48.75
147018
99760
NA
NA
NA
NA
35.94
15.64
NA
NA
NA
59
177
19.5
1.1
9.4
182
19.1
1.2
10.0
183
19.0
1.1
11.6
185
18.4
1.1
9.5
182
19.0
1.1
10.1
49.32
148756
100724
15.07
10.90
1.03
1.05
46.39
20.32
2.67
2.97
2.07
•Flow data represents an average of the data from the Method 5/202 and BIF Method 0011 testing.
-Flow data taken from the first test run of the MDI testing.
-------
EPA Methods 3 for determination of flue gas composition
and molecular weight (sampling procedure);
IPA Methods 3A for determination of flue gas
composition and molecular weight (analytical
procedure);
EPA Method 4 for determination of flue gas moisture
content;
EPA Method 5/202 for determination of total suspended
and condensible particulate emissions;
EPA Method 6C for determination of sulfur dioxide
emissions;
EPA Method 7E for determination of NOX emissions;
EPA Method 10 for determination of CO emissions;
BIF Method 0011 for determination of formaldehyde
emissions;
EPA Method 25A for determination of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs);
Draft EPA MACT Method for determination of methyl
bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) emissions.
Appendices G through I contain the raw field data for the
testing. Appendices K through M contain the laboratory data for
the testing.
4.1 Sampling Procedures
4.1.1 SamplingPoint Determination -EPA Method l; EPA
Reference Method 1 was used to determine the number and location
of the sampling and traverse points at the test location. Figure
1 shows the location of the sampling and traverse points for the
RTO stack. A total of 24 sampling and traverse points (12 for
8
-------
96.0"
POINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
11
12
7. ID
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.6
64.4
75.0
32.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
DISTANCE FROM
INSIDE OF PORT
(inches)
2.04
6.43
1 5,34
17.02
24.00
34.14
61.86
72.00
78.98
84.66
89.57
93.96
INSIDE STACK
DIAMETER
96.0 in
8.0 ft
Figure 1 - Sampling and Traverse Points for RTO Stack
-------
each of two ports) were utilized for all pollutant sampling and
gas flow rate measurements conducted at the RTO stack.
4.1.2 Volumetric Measurements - EPA Method2,; EPA Reference
Method 2 was used to determine the velocity and volumetric flow
rates of the stack gases. Stainless steel Type-S pitot tubes
were used to measure the gas velocity heads. The pitot tubes
were calibrated against a NIST traceable pitot tube in accordance
with Method 2. Calibrated Type-K thermocouples were used to
determine gas temperatures.
Velocity and temperature measurements were made at each of
the points traversing the stack as shown in Figure 1. These
measurements were performed in conjunction with the pollutant
sampling described below.
4.1.3 Molecular Weight Determination - EPA Method 3 and 3A: Gas
compositional measurements (02 and CO2) were performed in
accordance with EPA Methods 3 and 3A of 40 CFR 60.
4.1.3.1 Molecular Weight Determination - EPA Method 3; For test
runs two and three of the MDI sampling, gas compositional
measurements (02 and CO2) for determining the average molecular
weight of the stack gases were done in accordance with EPA
Reference Method 3. Multi-point, integrated sampling was used to
obtain a constant rate sample of flue gas concurrent with the
10
-------
pollutant testing. Sampling was of the same duration (except
purges following port changes) as the pollutant runs.
A stainless steel probe was affixed to the pollutant
sampling probe for this purpose. A peristaltic pump, delivering
500 to 750 mL/tnin of flue gas, was used to fill a Tedlar bag.
Moisture was removed from the sample gas by means of an air-
cooled condenser located prior to the pump. Figure 2 shows a
schematic of the Method 3 sampling train.
4.X.3.2 Molecular Weight Determination - EPA Method 3A; For the
remainder of the test program, gas compositional measurements (O2
and CO2) for determining the average molecular weight of the
stack gases were done instrumentally in accordance with EPA
Reference Method 3A. Sampling was done by obtaining integrated
gas samples as part of the continuous emissions monitoring
discussed in section 3.1.8.
4.1.4 Flue Gas Moisture Content - EPA Method 4: Flue gas
moisture was measured in conjunction with each of the pollutant
tests according to the sampling and analytical procedures
outlined in EPA Method 4. The flue gas moisture for each test
was determined by gravimetric analyses of the water collected in
the impinger condensers of the pollutant sampling train. All
iropingers were contained in an ice bath throughout the testing in
order to assure complete condensation of the moisture in the flue
11
-------
(!/*'$$
J Profe*
I M|«ll J*
VtM •{•,
»«,.,—«|
SI«Ck
Figure 2 - EPA Method 3 Sampling Train
-------
gas strean. Any moisture which was not condensed in the
impingers was captured in the silica gel contained in the final
impinger.
4.1.5 Particulate Sampling: Sampling for total particulate was
performed in accordance with EPA Method 5 of 4O CFR 60 in
conjunction with EPA Method 202 of 40 CFR 51.
4-1.5.1 Samp],ing Train Description: Figure 3 shows the major
components of the Method 5 sampling train. A heated stainless
steel probe with a quartz liner was used to withdraw the gas
sample. The probe was equipped with an appropriately sized
integrated quartz nozzle fused directly to the liner for
isokinetic gas withdrawal.
From the nozzle and probe, sample gas was pulled through a
heated glass fiber filter which is maintained at 248°F ± 25eF to
prevent water condensation. Sample gas was subsequently passed
through an impinger train consisting of five glass impingers
immersed in an ice bath. The first, second, and third impingers
each contained 100 milliliters of deionized distilled water. The
fourth impinger was initially empty, and the fifth initially
contained approximately 200 grams of silica gel.
13
-------
H«ot*d
Filter
Heattd StoinMs* Sdel ProBt
Ouortl Lin«r
Figure 3 - EPA Methods 5/202 Sampling Train
-------
4.1,5.2 Sampl incr TraInoperation: Sampling was done in
accordance with EPA Method 5 procedures and specifications,
including leak checking, isokinetic sampling rate and stack
traversing. Sampling was conducted for three minutes at each of
the 24 traverse points, resulting in a 72-minute test per run,
excluding the time required to change ports.
4.1.5.3 Sample Recovery andClean-Up; Recovery of the front-
half of the sampling train (probe plus filter and associated
glassware) was performed in accordance with EPA Method 5
procedures. The probe and front-half glassware were rinsed with
acetone three times each and brushed between rinses with a Teflon
fiber brush. Exposed filters were placed back into their
original tared containers.
The back-half of the sampling train (impingers plus
connecting glassware) were recovered in accordance with EPA
Method 202 procedures. The pH of the first impinger was measured
immediately after the test. If the pH was less than 4.5, then
the entire impinger train was purged for one hour using purified
air in accordance with Method 202 procedures. If the pH of the
first irapinger exceeded 4.5, then the purge was omitted.
After purging (if applicable), the contents of the first
four impingers were measured and transferred to glass jars. The
first four impingers and all back-half glassware were rinsed
15
-------
twice with water. All water rinses were collected with the
impinger contents. The back-half glassware was then rinsed twice
with methylene chloride. These rinses were collected into a
separate glass jar.
The silica gel from the fifth impinger was transferred back
to its original Nalgene container. The amount of moisture
collected in the sampling train was quantified in order to
determine the stack gas moisture content in accordance with EPA
Method 4.
4.1.5.4 field Blanks; Acetone, water, and methylene chloride
field blanks were collected during the test program. Each blank
was taken from the same reagent stock used for testing.
4.1.6 Formaldehyde Determination - BIF Method 0011:
Formaldehyde sampling was performed in accordance with the
procedures described in 40 CFR 266, Appendix IX, Section 3.5.
Appendices C and H contain all sampling data and results for the
BIF Method 0011 test program.
4.1.6.1 Sampling Train Description: A diagram of the BIF Method
0011 sampling train is provided in Figure 4. A heated stainless
steel probe with a quartz liner was used to withdraw the gas
sample. The probe was equipped with an appropriately sized
integrated quartz nozzle fused directly to the liner for
16
-------
Healed Clou
tTACX
Figure 4 - Sampling Train for BIF Method 0011
-------
isokinetic gas withdrawal. After the probe, effluent gas was
drawn into a train of four impingers immersed in an ice bath.
The first two impingers initially contained 100 aL of DNPH. The
third impinger was left empty and the fourth initially contained
approximately 200 grams of silica gel.
4.1.6.2 Sampl incr TrainOperation; Sampling was done in
accordance with EPA Method 5 procedures and specifications,
including leak checking, isokinetic sampling rate and stack
traversing. Sampling was conducted for three minutes at each of
the 24 traverse points, resulting in a 72-minute test per run,
excluding the time reguired to change ports.
4.1.6.3 SampleRecovery and Clean-up; Recovery of the front-
half of the sampling train (probe and associated glassware) was
performed as follows. The probe and front-half glassware were
rinsed with methylene chloride three times each and brushed
between rinses with a Teflon fiber brush.
The back-half of the sampling train (impingers plus
connecting glassware) were recovered in accordance with BIF
Method 0011 procedures. The contents of the first three
impingers were measured and transferred to an amber flint glass
jar. The first three impingers and all back-half glassware were
rinsed three times with methylene chloride. All rinses were
collected with the impinger contents. The back-half glassware
18
-------
was then rinsed with distilled water. The water rinse was
collected into the same amber glass jar.
The silica gel from the fourth impinger was transferred back
to its original Nalgene container. The amount of moisture
collected in the sampling train was quantified in order to
determine the stack gas moisture content in accordance with EPA
Method 4.
4.1.6.4 Sample Storage and Transport; Immediately upon re-
covery, all samples were placed into insulated coolers packed
with ice, thus protecting the samples from light and heat.
The samples remained inside the coolers during transport to
the analytical laboratory. While in the custody of ETS, the
temperatures inside the coolers were periodically measured to
insure that the samples did not exceed 32°F. All samples were
express mailed directly to the analytical lab for analysis.
While at the lab, the samples were kept in a refrigerated
compartment until analyzed.
4.1.6.5 glanks; One field blank was collected during the BIF
Method 0011 testing. The field blank consisted of a reagent
blank from the batch of DNPH reagent and a methylene chloride
reagent blank.
19
-------
4.1.7 Methvlene Bisphenvl Isocvanate fMDI) Sampling - Draft EPA
HACT,_MeJbJiod: Sampling for MDI was conducted in accordance with
Draft EPA MACT Method.
4.1.7.1 Sampling Train Description: Figure 5 illustrates the
sampling train for measuring MDI. A heated stainless steel probe
with a quartz liner was used to withdraw the gas sample. The
probe was equipped with an appropriately sized integrated quartz
nozzle fused directly to the liner for isokinetic gas withdrawal.
After the probe, the gases passed into a impinger train
consisting of six impingers packed in ice water with a water-
cooled glass condenser placed between the first and second
impingers. The first impinger contained 300 milliliters of
absorbing solution (l-(2-pyridyl) piperazine in toluene).
Coolant water maintained at wet-ice temperature was continuously
recirculated into the condenser using a submersible water pump.
The condenser minimized the evaporation of toluene from the first
impinger. The second and third impingers each contained 200
milliliters of absorbing solution. The fourth impinger was
initially left empty. The fifth and sixth impinger contained
approximately 200 grams of activated charcoal and 200 grams of
silica gel, respectively.
All components from the nozzle to the sixth impinger were
made of glass. All connections from the probe to the exit stem
20
-------
Figure 5 - Sampling Train for MDI
-------
of the sixth impinger were sealed with Teflon 0-rings. Sealing
grease was not used on any connections before the sixth impinger.
\
4.1.7.2 Sample Train Operation.; Sampling was performed in
general accordance with EPA Method 5 procedures and specifica-
tions, including leak checking, isokinetic sampling rate, and
stack traversing.
Sampling was performed for 2.5 minutes at each of the 24
traverse points, yielding a 60-minute test per run. A minimum
sample volume of 35.31 dry standard cubic feet was obtained for
each test run.
4.1.7.3 Sample Recovery and Clean-up: At the completion of each
test, the probe was removed from the train and the ends of the
sampling train capped with Teflon tape. The probe was recovered
immediately on the sampling platform, while the remainder of the
sampling train was transported to a clean-up site for recovery.
Sample recovery proceeded as follows:
1) Front-half Rinse; The probe and all connecting lines
between the probe and first impinger were rinsed three times
with toluene. A Teflon-fiber probe brush was used to brush
the probe between rinses. Following the toluene rinse, the
probe and all connecting lines between the probe and first
impinger were rinsed with acetonitrile. All rinses were
22
-------
collected into a pre-cleaned amber glass bottle fitted with
a Teflon-lined screw cap.
2) Impinaer 1 Recovery; The condensate collected in the first
impinger was transferred to a graduated cylinder and the
volume recorded. The liquid was then transferred into the
amber glass bottle containing the probe rinses. The
impinger was rinsed with toluene and then acetonitrile. The
rinses were collected into the same bottle.
3) Impinoers 2-4 Recovery: The liquid volumes in impingers two
through four were recorded for the Method 4 moisture
determination. The liquids were then transferred in a
pre-cleaned amber glass bottle fitted with a Teflon-
lined screw cap. A toluene rinse followed by an
acetonitrile rinse was performed on impingers two
through four along with the condenser and any
connecting glassware. These rinses were collected in
the same amber bottle.
4) Activated Charcoal: The activated charcoal in the fifth
impinger was transferred into its original plastic container
and sealed.
5) Silica Gel: The silica gel in the sixth impinger was
transferred into its original plastic container and sealed.
23
-------
4.1.7.4 Sample Storage and Transport; Immediately upon re-
covery, all samples including liquid rinses were placed into
insulated coolers packed with ice, thus protecting the samples
from light and heat.
The samples remained inside the coolers during transport to
the analytical laboratory. While in the custody of ETS, the
temperatures inside the coolers were periodically measured to
insure that the samples did not exceed 32°F. All samples were
express mailed directly to the analytical lab for analysis.
While at the lab, the samples were kept in a refrigerated
compartment until analyzed.
4.1.7.5 Field Blanks: One field blank was collected during the
test program for MDI. The field blank consisted of a reagent
blank from the batch of absorbing solution, a toluene reagent
blank, and an acetonitrile reagent blank.
4.1.8 Continuous Monitoring for SO,, NOK, CO, THC, Q, and CO,^
InstrumentalMethods; Instrumental monitoring of the stack gases
was performed in accordance with the following procedures;
24
-------
GAS
so2
NOX
CO
THC
CO,
REFERENCE METHOD
Method 6C
Method 7E
Method 10
Method 25A
Method 3A
Method 3A
INSTRUMENT
Western Research 721M SO2
Analyzer
TECO Model 10AR chemilu-
minesence NOX Analyzer
TECO Model 48 NDIR CO Analyzer
J.U.M. Engineering Model VE7
FID Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer
Teledyne Model 320A Chemical
Cell Portable 02 Analyzer
FUJI Model 3300 A NDIR
C02 Analyzer
All of the analyzers except the hydrocarbon analyzer
measured gas concentrations on a dry volume basis. The
hydrocarbon analyzer measured the concentrations on a wet volume
basis as propane.
4.1.8.1 Sampling System Description: An integrated, remote
instrumental system housing the pollutant gas analyzers as well
as the diluent gas (O2 and C02) monitors was used. Figure 6
outlines the general schematic of the system. The design
incorporated two extractive systems - one for the dry analyzers
and one for the wet hydrocarbon analyzer. All of the
instruments were housed in a trailer located at ground level.
The dry sampling system consisted of a heated stainless
steel probe located at the stack port location. A heated glass
fiber filter was attached to the probe for rough participate
removal. A short section of heated Teflon sample line was used
25
-------
CoiTbfotlcxi Con
Figure 6 - Continuous Emissions Monitoring System for
EPA Methods 3A, 6Cr 71, 10 and 25A
-------
to deliver the sample to an ice-cooled condenser designed to
remove the flue gas moisture. An unheated Teflon sample line was
used to transport the dry gas sample from the stack port location
down to the instrumental system. The sample gas exiting the
Teflon sample line was pumped to the SO2, NOX/ CO, CO2/ and O2
monitors.
The sampling system for the hydrocarbon analyzer
incorporated a heated stainless steel probe, a heated glass fiber
filter, and a heated Teflon sample line. The sample line was
heated along its entire length from the stack sampling location
to the analyzer.
4.1.8.2 Data Acquisition System; The response outputs of the
monitors were recorded digitally by a Campbell Scientific Model
CR10WP multi-channel data acquisition system. The system sampled
at a rate of 60 Hz and stored one-minute average values.
4.1.8.3 Dry System Calibration; At the beginning of each test
run, the 02, CO2, SO2, and NOX monitors on the dry sampling system
were zeroed, using Zero Nitrogen and spanned using a certified
calibration gas with a concentration of 80 to 100 percent of the
instrument span. Following calibration a mid range gas, 40 to 60
percent of the instrument span, was introduced to each monitor.
The mid range response error never exceeded two percent of the
instrument span as required by EPA Reference Method 6C.
27
-------
The CO monitor was zeroed using Zero Nitrogen and
spanned using a known concentration of CO in nitrogen. Following
calibration, the CO monitor was challenged with two additional
gas concentrations corresponding to approximately 60 percent and
30 percent of instrument span. All calibration gases were EPA
Protocol 1 certified to be within ±2 percent of stated
concentration.
After calibrating the 02, C02, SO2, and NOX monitors,
calibration gas was introduced remotely through the probe in
order to verify the absence of sampling system bias. The bias
error never exceeded five percent of the instrument span as
required by EPA Reference Method 6C.
After each test run, Zero Nitrogen and either a mid or high
range calibration gas were introduced remotely through the
sampling system to each monitor to check for calibration drift
error. In accordance with Method 6C, the calibration drift did
not exceed three percent of the instrument span for all valid
test runs.
4.1.8.4 Wet System Calibration; All calibration gas standards
used were EPA Protocol l certified. At the beginning of each
test period, the VOC measurement system was zeroed, using Zero
Nitrogen, and spanned, using a calibration gas with a
concentration of 80 to 90 percent of the instrument span.
28
-------
Following calibration a mid range gas (45 to 55 percent of the
instrument span) and then a low range calibration gas (25 "to 35
percent of the instrument span) were introduced to the
measurement system to check response linearity. The mid and low
range response error did not exceed five percent of the
calibration gas value as required by EPA Reference Method 25A.
After each test run, calibration gas was introduced to the
VOC measurement system in order to indicate the zero and
calibration drift. EPA Method 25A requires that the zero and
calibration drift errors not exceed three percent of the
instrument span.
4 . 2 Ana 1 vt ica 1
4.2.1 Molecular Weight Determination - EPA Method 3A; Flue gas
compositional analysis for molecular weight determination was
conducted using instrumental analyzers operated in general
accordance with EPA Method 3A. The instruments were calibrated
before each analysis with EPA Protocol 1 calibration gas
standards. Each bag was analyzed in triplicate and the average
flue gas composition used for calculation of gas volumetric flow
rate.
4.2.2 MjojLsture Content - EPA Method 4; Moisture contents were
determined gravimetrically in accordance with Method 4 by
29
-------
measuring the volume or mass gains of each impinger in the
pollutant sampling trains. .
4.2.3 Particulate Analyses - EPA Method 5 and 202; Particulate
matter was determined in accordance with EPA Method 5 and 202
procedures. Appendix K contains the laboratory data for the
analysis.
The filter was desiccated and analyzed gravimetrically to a
constant weight. The front-half acetone rinse was evaporated and
analyzed gravimetrically to a constant weight. The front-half
particulate catch equals the sum of the front half acetone rinse
and the filter, in accordance with Method 5.
The determination of the total condensible particulate
matter in the back-half of the sampling train was determined in
accordance with Method 202 procedures. The total sulfate
concentration of the impinger contents and aqueous rinses was
determined by analyzing an aliquot of the impinger water and
rinses sample using ion chromatography. The impinger contents
and aqueous rinses were then combined with the methylene chloride
rinses and extracted twice with methylene chloride using a
separatory funnel. The sample was divided into organic
(methylene chloride) and inorganic (aqueous) fractions. The
organic fraction was evaporated at room temperature and pressure,
30
-------
and the resulting residue gravimetrically analyzed to a constant
weight.
The inorganic fraction was evaporated to dryness at 105°C.
If the pH of the original impinger solutions was less than 4.5,
then the resulting residue was redissolved in 100 milliliters of
distilled water, and made basic using concentrated ammonium
hydroxide. The resulting solution was evaporated to dryness at
105°C once more, and the residue determined gravimetrically. If
the pH of the original solution was greater than 4.5, then the
ammonia addition step was omitted.
The back-half condensible particulate catch equals the
organic residue plus the inorganic residue plus the combined
water removed by the acid-base reaction based on the impinger
analysis for sulfate. The total particulate catch equals the
front-half probe rinse and filter plus the back-half
condensibles.
4.2.4 Formaldehyde Analyses: The impinger solutions and train
rinses from the BIF Method 0011 sampling train were analyzed for
formaldehyde using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
in accordance with BIF Method 0011A.
4.2.5 Methylene Bisphenvl Isocyanate (MDI1 Analyses; The
impinger solutions and train rinses from the MDI sampling train
31
-------
were analyzed for HDI using high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) in accordance with draft EPA MACT Method.
5.0 Data .Analysis
Sample calculations related to the pollutant sampling,
including gas flow rates, temperatures, percent isokinetics, and
moisture content, are shown in Appendix F.
6.0 Equipment Calibration
Field equipment was calibrated in accordance with the
requirements of the applicable EPA Methods and those recommended
within the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems: Volume III" (IPA-600/4-77-027b, August,
1977). Field equipment calibrations are contained in Appendix O,
32
-------
APPENDIX A
TEST LOG
-------
TEST LOG
LOUISIANA PACIFIC - DUNGANNON, VIRGINIA
UNIT
RTO
-
RTO
RTO
RTO
LOCATION
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
OUTLET
TEST
PARAMETER
PARTICULATE
PARTICULATE
PARTICULATE
FORMALDEHYDE
FORMALDEHYDE
FORMALDEHYDE
MD!
MDI
MDI
OZ1CO2,S02,NOx,CO,VOC
O2.C02,SO2,NOx,CO,VOe
O2,CO2,SO2,NOx,CO,VOC
O2,C02,S02,NOx,CO,VOC
TEST
METHOD
METHOD 5/202
METHOD 5/202
METHOD 5/202
B1F METHOD 00 It
BiF METHOD 0011
BIF METHOD 00 11
METHOD MDI
METHOD MDI
METHOD MDI
METHOD 3A,6C.7E.tO,25A
METHOD 3A,6C,7E,10,25A
METHOD 3A,6C,7E,10.25A
METHOD 3A.6C,7E,10,25A
RUN I.D.
RTO-M5/202-R1
RTO-M5/2Q2-R2
RTO-M5/202-R3
RTO-M0011-R1
RTO-M0011-R2
RTO-M0011-R3
RTO-MDI-R1
RTO-MDI-R2
RTO-MDI-R3
RTO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R1
RTO-M3A.6C,7E,1Q,25A-R2
RTO-M3A,6C,7E,1 0.25A-R3
RTO-M3A,6C,7E,1 0.25A-R4
DATE
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/28/95
07/28/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
07/27/95
START
TIME
09:15
12:15
14:30
09:15
12:15
14:30
16:50
11:45
12:30
09:15
12:15
14:30
16:50
END
TIME
10:56
13:35
15:49
10:56
13:35
15:49
18:07
13:05
13:33
10:15
13:15
15:30
17:45
-------
APPENDIX B
DATA AND RESULTS FOR EPA METHOD 5/202
RTO STACK
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-M5/202-R1
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Metered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokinetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DeqFl (in.WC)
1 175 -0.47
2 177 -0.46
3 179
4 174
5 173
6 174
7 176
8 174
9 172
10 172
11 171
12 169
13 179
14 180
15 182
16 183
17 182
18 181
19 183
20 185
21 182
22 180
23 177
24 175
07/27/95
09:15
10:58
96 inches
0.250 Inches
1.0166
1.7393
27.43 in.Hg
0.84
72 minutes
53.455 dcf
48.350 dscf
9.53 %
100.3 %
47.73 Wsec
143964 acfm
109213 scfm
98803 dscfm
DP OH
(in.WCJ_ lin.WCI
0.55 1.67
0.59 1.79
0.57 1.72
0.6A 1.82
0.57 1.74
0.57 1.73
0.57 1.73
0.58 1.76
0.54 1 .65
0.50 1 .53
0.44 1.34
0.35 1.07
0.59 1.78
0.58 1.75
0.58 1.74
0.56 . 1.68
0.56 1.68
0.57 1.71
0.57 1.71
0.55 1.64
0.54 1.62
0.49 1.48
0.43 1.30
0.34 1 .03
METHOD
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
327.658
381.113
4 DATA
INIT.
Ml
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.0
300.0
200,0
3 DATA
19.5
1.11
0.0
79.4
20.6
FINAL
(mil
165.0
129.0
102.0
0.5
396.5
211,7
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
iffiQ
65.0
29.0
2.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
86.5
11.7
23.96
27.91
27.40
1.231
1375
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
82
83
85
. 85
86
86
87
87
88
89
89
90
86
86
87
87
88
89
90
91
91
91
92
91
OUTLET
(DegF)
82
80
81
81
81
82
82
83
83
84
85
86
85
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
88
88
88
88
AVG.
177
-0.47
0.53
1.61
381.113
53.455
86
-------
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
EPA METHOD 5/202 ANALYTICAL DATA AND RESULTS
SAMPLJNG DATA:
Run Number:
Corr. Sample Volume:
Corr. Flowrate
O2 Content:
CO2 Content:
SUMMARY:
RTO-M5/202-R1
48.350 dscf
98803 dscfm
19.5 %
1.1 %
•'• • CORRECTED
'NET, : FOR BLANK;
COMPONENT (grams) >> (grams) 5
SUSPENDED PM
Probe Wash 0.00430
Filter 0.00320
CONDENSIBLE PM
Organic CPM 0.00730
Inorganic CPM 0.00390
TOTAL CPM 0.01120
TOTAL PM 0.01870
ANALYTICAL DATA:
METHOD "5 COMPONENTS
Acetone Probe Wash
Acetone Blank Residue
Applicable Acetone Blank
Max. Allowable Blank
Filter
METHOD 202 COMPONENTS
Volume of Cont#4
Organic CPM (Uncorr.)
MeCI2 Blank
Inorganic CPM (Uncorr.)
H2O Blank
Inorganic CPM (Corr.)
0.00430
0.00320
0.00730
0.00114
0.00844
0.01594
- TARE FINAL
(grams) ' (grams) -'
67.46020 67.46450
64.29320 64.29320
0.41790 0.42110
TARE FINAL .-
(grams) (grams)
66.83550 66.84280
67.33300 67.33260
6726250 6726640
70.94820 70.95130
NET
(grams)
0.00430
0.00000
0.00000
0.00086
0.00320
.NET
(grams)
0.00730
0.00000
0.00390
0.00310
0.00390
VOLUME
(ml)
110.0
120.0
REAGENT J' - ^ <
VOLUME,.' CONC. <
(ml) ' (mg/l)
400.0 '
270.0
275.0
400.0
450.0
P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS:
• •
Actual Grain Loading (gr/dscf)
Corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dscf)
Corrected to 12% CO2 (gr/dscf)
Mass Rate (lb/hr)
." "<•' ^FILTERABLE'
0.0024
0.0243
0.0258
2.03
CPM" '."
0.0027
0.0273
0.0291
2.28
: TOTAL o";l'' -;
0.0051
0.0516
0.0549
4.31
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-M5/202-R2
Date
Start Time
£nd Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Mete red Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokjnetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DeqF) (in.WC)
1 182 -0.48
2 181 -0.46
3 182
4 181
5 182
6 184
7 186
8 187
9 183
10 180
11 179
12 177
13 180
14 182
15 183
16 183
17 182
18 184
19 181
20 180
21 181
22 180
23 178
24 176
07/27/95
12:15
13:35
96 inches
0.250 Inches
1.0166
1.7393
27.43 in.Hg
0.84
72 minutes
53.751 dcf
47.974 dscf
10.22 %
100.7 %
47.83 ft/sec
144256 acfm
108728 scfm
97616 dscfm
DP DH
(in.WC) (in.WC)
0.51 1.53
0.53 1.59
0.52 1.56
0.58 1.74
0.54 1.62
0.57 1.71
0.55 1.64
0.56 1.67
0.52 1.56
0.51 1.54
0.45 1.36
0.42 1.27
0.54 1.63
0.57 1.71
0.53 1.59
0.55 1.65
0.57 1.71
0.56 1.68
0.53 1.59
0.54 1.63
0.56 1.68
0.54 1.63
0.52 1.57
0.41 1.24
METHOD 4 DATA
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcO
381.837
435.588
INIT.
fmn
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.0
300.0
200.0
3 DATA
19.1
1.17
0.0
79.7
20.3
FINAL NET
(mn {mil
155.0 55.0
138.0 38.0
109.0 9.0
2.0. 2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
404.0 104.0
212.0 12.0
Md 28.95
Ms 27.83
Ps 27.40
Fo 1.524
%EA 994
METER TEMPERATURE
JNLET
(DegF)
89
90
90
91
92
93
94
94
94
95
96
96
92
94
95
96
96
97
97
98
98
98
99
99
OUTLET
(DegF)
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
92
92
92
92
93
92
92
93
93
93
93
94
94
94
95
95
95
AVG.
181
-0.47
0.53
1.59
435.588
53.751
93
-------
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
EPA METHOD 5/202 ANALYTICAL DATA AND RESULTS
SAMPLING DATA:
Run Number:
Com. Sample Volume:
Co FT. Flowrate
O2 Content:
CO2 Content:
SUMMARY:
RTO-M5/202-R2
47.974 dscf
97616 dscfm
19.1 %
1.2 %
I v % CORRECTED
'; ..• :. . NET/ FOR BLANK:
COMPONENT (qrams) (qrams) ^
SUSPENDED PM
Probe Wash 0.00280
Filter 0.00430
CONDENSIBLE PM
Organic CPM 0.00350
Inorganic CPM 0.00620
TOTAL CPM 0.00970
TOTAL PM 0.01680
ANALYTICAL DATA:
METHOD 5 COMPONENTS
Acetone Probe Wash
Acetone Blank Residue
Applicable Acetone Blank
Max. Allowable Blank
Filter
METHOD 202 COMPONENTS
Volume of Cont#4
Organic CPM (Uncorr.)
MeCI2 Blank
Inorganic CPM (Uncorr.)
H20 Blank
Inorganic CPM (Corr.)
0.00280
0.00430
0.00350
0.00338
0.00688
0.01398
TARE FINAL
(grams) (grams)
67.18480 67.18760
64.29320 64.29320
0.41780 0.42210
TARE - , FINAL "
(grams) - (grams)
64.88330 64.88680
67.33300 67.33260
67.37660 67.38280
70.94820 70.95130
NET
(grams)
0.00280
0.00000
0.00000
0.00078
0.00430
NET ,
(grams)
0.00350
0.00000
0.00620
0.00310
0.00620
VOLUME: < ;
(ml)' .^£.; i
100.0
120.0
-REAGENT " $:; ,
VOLUME ^/YC'ONC.
(mJ)' '"' (mg/IJ
410.0
255.0
275.0
410.0
450.0
P 'ARTICULATE EMISSIONS:
'•': •'••': '.-''"'. '.>"::•. "' '-:'!•?> ,' .-'.' : .'•'-'.•'. :-';\ '.';-; •: > '.•-"-.;:- ; v ;'• '•-• •: -,: : '." '•'•'•':•?.• ~ :>•. • •-•""
Actual Grain Loading (gr/dscO
Corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dscf)
Corrected to 12% CO2 (gr/dscO
Mass Rate (Ib/hr)
r^-:^tmim FILTERABCE '^
0.0023
0.0178
0.0235
1.91
•?;:^CPM '•
0.0022
0.0173
0.0227
1.85
•' TOTAL'-- ;^:v "-^
0.0045 •
0.0351
0.0462
3.76
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-M5/202-R3
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meier Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1^1 RESULTS
Metered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isoklnetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DegF) (in.WC)
1 184 -0.45
2 185 -0.43
3 185
4 184
5 184
6 183
7 183
8 182
9 180
10 179
11 177
12 175
13 187
14 189
15 189
16 188
17 188
18 187
19 184
20 182
21 184
22 184
23 182
24 179
07/27/95
14:30
15:49
96 inches
0.250 inches
1.0166
1.7393
27.43 in.Hg
0.84
72 minutes
52.702 dcf
46.492 dscf
12.45 %
99.6 %
48.19 tt/sec
145352 acfm
109209 scfm
95607 dscfm
DP DH
fm.WC) (in.WC)
0.39 0.95
0.52 1.60
0.55 1.69
0.53 1.63
0.54 1.60
0.54 1.66
0.54 1.66
0.55 1.70
0.58 1.64
0.56 1.55
0.47 1.46
0.41 1.28
0.50 1.53
0.56 1.71
0.57 1.74
0.56 1.71
0.59 1.74
0.56 1.71
0.56 1.72
0.54 1.67
0.55 1.69
0.54 1.66
0.53 1.64
0.48 1.49
METHOD 4 DATA
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
JMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.8
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
435.881
488.583
INiT.
(ml)
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.0
300.0
200.0
3 DATA
19.0
1.12
0.0
79.9
20.1
FINAL
ftnft
188.0
138.0
102.0
1.0
429.0
211.5
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
frtm
88.0
38.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
•o.o
0.0
129.0
11.5
28.94
27.58
27.40
1.705
904
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
99
99
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
102
102
103
98
99
100
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
103
103
OUTLET
(DeaF)
98
98
98
98
98
98
99
99
99
100
100
100
98
98
99
99
99
99
99
100
100
100
100
100
AVG.
184
-0.44
0.53
1.60
488.583
52.702
100
-------
LOUISIANA PACIFIC
RTO STACK
EPA METHOD 5/202 ANALYTICAL DATA AND RESULTS
SAMPLJNG DATA:
Run Number;
Corr. Sample Volume:
Corr. Flowrate
O2 Content:
CO2 Content:
SUMMARY:
RTO-M5/202-R3
46.492 dscf
85607 dscfm
1i.O %
1.1 %
":- , CORRECTED^
NET '' FORBLANK'
COMPONENT (gramsi (grams) '
SUSPENDED PM
Probe Wash 0.00340 0.00340
Filter 0.00520 0.00520
CONDENSIBLE PM
Organic CPM 0.00500 0.00500
Inorganic CPM 0.00280 -0.00009
TOTAL CPM 0.00780 0.00491
TOTAL PM 0.01640 0.01351
ANALYTICAL DATA:
TARE . ; '•
METHOD 5 COMPONENTS (grams)
Acetone Probe Wash 70.12320
Acetone Blank Residue 64.29320
Applicable Acetone Blank
Max. Allowable Blank
Filter 0.41680
• >•:?-• ••:'. :':/.-;i1 ":••• '-:'-'^\-!''i':'\ '"•, '. rS:": :^^'i::'^y-:-^. ',::^:-i^:W;
^^W^£^^-^-<^^:^&
METHOD 202 COMPONENTS S (grams)
Volume of Cont.#4
Organic CPM (Uncorr.) 67.021 60
MeCI2 Blank 67.33300
Inorganic CPM (Uncorr.) 64.14680
H2O Blank 70.94820
Inorganic CPM (Corr.)
(grams) ••••'•'^•'••;
70.12660
6429320
0.42200
^FSNAL^;^'
~ (grams) -";'v
67.02660
67.33260
64.14960
70.95130
:;.-(gra'rns)':'.:v":;
0.00340
0.00000
0.00000
0.00078
0.00520
(grams)
0.00500
0.00000
0.00280
0.00310
0.00280
-:fvqLUME -^?i ^-r-:^'-:
* . v -x :: • "" * ''''"''«»' -'-'-s ' '-' • ' • '- : - <*. .-• *.* -.-^ ;""' '" •"
•.••••.,••.:•. (ml) •.••.••;::-5-:ii;;-:,:x:'--
100.0
120.0
'^ ^xjrnl) sv;.:7^l&::-i(mgi/1) '^
420.0
290.0
275.0
420.0
450.0
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS:
^:f.'-&'&^?&^
Actual Grain Loading (gr/dscf)
Corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dscf)
Corrected to 12% CO2 (gr/dscf)
Mass Rate (Ib/hr)
0.0029
0.0208
0.0306
2.34
0.0016
0.0119
0.0174
1.33
0.0045
. 0.0326
0.0480
3.67
-------
APPENDIX C
DATA AND RESULTS FOR BIF METHOD 0011
RTO STACK
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-C011-R1
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-1 RESULTS
Metered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokinetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DegF) Qn.WC)
1 171 -0.48
2 175 -0.47
3 177
4 174
5 173
6 175
7 172
8 176
9 172
10 173
11 171
12 170
13 180
14 183
15 180
16 185
17 181
18 184
19 186
20 179
21 181
22 177
23 177
24 176
07/27/95
Oi:15
10:56
96 inches
0.250 inches
0.9928
1.8475
27.43 in.Hg
0.823
72 minutes
62.154 dcf
55.063 dscf
9.27 %
106.1 %
51.21 ft/sec
154433 acfrn
117205 scfm
106339 dscfm
DP DH
On.WC) Gn-WC)
0.70 2.31
0.70 2.51
0.75 2.48
0.71 2.34
0.73 2.41
0.69 2.28
0.70 2.34
0.70 2.34
0.65 2.15
0.65 2.15
0.50 1.65
0.45 1.49
0.75 2.48
0.75 2.48
0,68 2.24
0.65 2.15
0.62 2.05
0.60 2.05
0.59 1.95
0.61 2.01
0.63 2.08
0.52 1.72
0.52 1.72
0.50 1.65
METHOD 4 DATA
IMP.1
IMP.2
1MP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMPJ
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%C02
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
706.726
768.880
INIT.
fmn
100.0
100.0
0.0
200.0
200.0
3 DATA
19.5
1.1
0.0
79.4
20.6
FINAL
fmll
175.0
122.0
3.0
300.0
219.5
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
fmn
75.0
22.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
19.5
28.96
27.94
27,40
1.231
1375
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
78
83
84
85
86
87
89
89
89
89
90
90
86
86
87
88
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
OUTLET
(DegF)
76
80
81
81
81
82
83
83
83
83
83
84
85
84
84
84
84
84
84
85
84
84
85
85
AVG.
177
-0.48
0.64
2.13
768.880
62.154
85
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-Q011-R2
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Melered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokinetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std, Flow
Dry Std, Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DegF) (in.WC)
1 183 -0.49
2 180 -0.45
3 183
4 180
5 183
6 183
7 184
8 182
9 181
10 180
11 179
12 180
13 183
14 184
15 186
16 184
17 186
18 183
19 184
20 182
21 184
22 182
23 181
24 180
07/27/95
12:15
13:35
96 inches
0.250 inches
0.9928
1.8475
27,43 in.Hg
0.823
72 minutes
59.370 dcf
51.650 dscf
9.86 %
101.7 %
50.86 ft/sec
153388 acfm
115439 scfm
104057 dscfm
DP DH
(in.WC) {in.WC)
0.61 1.89
0.68 2.11
0.86 2.05
0.66 2.05
0.64 1.98
0.67 2.08
0.65 2.02
0,62 1.92
0.62 1.92
0.60 1.86
0.50 1.55
0.51 1.58
0.69 2.14
0.68 2.11
0.66 2.05
0.70 2.17
0.70 2.17
0.62 1.92
0.63 1.95
0.59 1 .83
0.60 1.88
0.60 1 .86
0.52 1.61
0.53 1.64
METHOD 4 DATA
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
IMPJ
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
769.064
828.434
INIT.
fmn
100.0
100.0
0.0
200.0
200.0
3 DATA
19.1
1.2
0.0
79.7
20.3
FINAL
(rot)
187.0
119.0
2.0
308.0
212.0
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
fmn
87.0
19.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
108.0
12.0
28.95
27.87
27.40
1.524
994
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
89
93
93
94
95
95
95
95
95
95
94
94
95
96
98
99
100
101
101
101
102
102
103
104
OUTLET
(DegF)
89
91
92
92
92
92
92
92
93
93
92
92
92
92
92
93.
93
94
95
95
96
96
96
97
AVG.
182
•0.47
OJ2
1.93
828.434
59.370
95
-------
APPENDIX D
DATA AND RESULTS FOR MDI TESTING
RTO STACK
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-MDI-R1
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam,
Nozzle I.D,
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Metered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokinetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT {DegF) fm.WC)
1 185 -0.48
2 185 -0,4?
3 187
4 186
5 187
6 187
7 185
8 186
9 184
10 184
11 181
12 179
13 184
14 186
15 186
18 188
17 187
18 187
19 184
20 185
21 184
22 181
23 183
24 179
07/27/95
16:50
18:07
96 inches
0 250 inches
0.9928
1.8475
27.43 in.Hg
0.823
60 minutes
46.142 dcf
39.389 dscf
9.53 %
99.1 %
47.76 ft/sec
144045 acfm
108035 scfm
97743 dscfm
DP DH
fm.WC) (in.WC)
0.55 1.79
0.50 1.63
0.60 1.95
0.61 1.99
0.58 1.89
0.59 1.92
0.58 1.89
0.58 1,89
0.56 1.83
0.54 1 .76
0.47 1.54
0.45 1.49
0.58 1.90
0.51 1 .66
0.60 1.95
0.60 1 .95
0.57 1.85
0.56 1.82
0.57 1.86
0.57 1.86
0.55 1.80
0.51 1.67
0.48 1.57
0.42 1.38
METHOD 4 DATA
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
889.360
935.502
INIT.
(ml)
300.0
200.0
200.0
0.0
700,0
400.0
3 DATA
18.4
1.1
0.0
80.5
19.5
FINAL
finll
260.0
256.0
201.0
4.0
721.0
467.0
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
(mn
-40.0
56.0
1.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.0
67.0
28.91
27.87
27. 4Q
2.287
648
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
107
107
107
107
108
108
108
108
108
108
109
107
107
107
107
108
OUTLET
(DegF)
100
100
101
101
102
103
103
104
105
105
105
106
106
106
107
107
107
107
107
106
106
106
106
106
AVG.
185
-0.48
0.55
1.79
935.502
46.142
105
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-MDI-R2
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Mete red Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% IsokJnetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std. Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DegF) (in.WC)
1 177 -0.40
2 180 -0.40
3 176
4 178
5 177
6 179
7 178
8 180
9 177
10 181
11 179
12 177
13 186
14 185
15 190
16 188
17 189
18 185
19 181
20 180
21 183
22 180
23 180
24 180
7/28/95
11:45
13:05
96
0.25
0.9928
1.8475
27.47
0.823
60
48.913
43.043
8.61
103.6
49.07
147978
111776
102154
DP
(in.WC)
0.62
0.63
0.65
0.62
0.66
0.62
0.62
0.63
0.58
0.58
0.49
0.49
0.63
0.63
0.61
0.65
0.61
0.58
0.55
0.60
0.57
0.52
0.48
0.42
METHOD 4 DATA
inches
inches
in.Hg
minutes
dcf
dscf
%
%
ft/sec
acfm
scfm
dscfm
DH
(in.WC)
1.96
1.99
2.05
1.96
2.09
1.96
1.96
1.99
1.83
1.83
1.55
1.55
1.99
1.99
1.93
2.05
1.93
1.83
1.74
1.98
1.88
1.72
1.58
1.39
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
IMP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
937.007
985.920
INIT.
(mD
300.0
200.0
200.0
0.0
700.0
400.0
3 DATA
20.1
1.0
0.0
78.9
21.1
FINAL
fmn
222.0
276.0
211.0
1.0
710.0
476.0
Md
Ms
Ps
Fo
%EA
NET
fmn
-78.0
76.0
11.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
76.0
28.96
28.02
27.44
0.800
2755
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DeaF)
91
92
91
90
91
90
90
90
91
92
92
93
92
93
92
92
93
93
93'
92
92
92
92
92
OUTLET
(DegF)
87
91
87
87
87
87
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
88
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
AVG.
181
-0.40
0.59
1.86
985.920
48.913
89
-------
RUN NUMBER
RTO-MDI-R3
Date
Start Time
End Time
Stack Diam.
Nozzle I.D.
Meter Box Gamma
Meter Box dH@
Barometric
Cp
Test Duration
METHOD 1-4 RESULTS
Metered Volume
Volume @ Std.Cond.
% Water
% Isokinetics
Velocity
Actual Flow
Std, Flow
Dry Std. Flow
STACK
TEMP STATIC
POINT (DegF) fm.WC)
1 180 -0.40
2 181 -0,40
3 181
4 183
5 183
6 184
7 181
8 181
9 180
10 181
11 180
12 181
13 180
14 180
15 180
16 182
17 181
18 184
19 180
20 182
21 180
22 183
23 180
24 181
7/28/95
12:30
13:33
96
0.25
0.9928
1.8475
27.47
0.823
60
48.532
42.761
9.30
103.6
49.14
148190
111914
101509
DP
(in.WC)
0,66
0.63
0.64
0.61
0.61
0.62
0,62
0.59
0.60
0.55
0.47
0.46
0.62
0.65
0.63
0.61
0.61
0.59
0.60
0.60
0.57
0.57
0.48
0.45
METHOD 4 DATA
inches
inches
in.Hg
minutes
dcf
dscf
%
%
ft/sec
acfm
scfm
dscfm
DH
fm.WC)
2.11
2.02
2.05
1.95
1.95
1.98
1.98
1.89
1.92
1.76
1.50
1.47
1.98
2.08
2.02
1.95
1.95
1.89
1.92
1.92
1.82
1.82
1.54
1.44
IMP.1
IMP.2
IMP.3
IMP.4
IMP.5
IMP.6
1MP.7
TOTAL
S.G.
METHOD
%O2
%CO2
%CO
%N2
O2+CO2
METER
VOLUME
(dcf)
988.476
1037.008
INIT.
(mn
300.0
200.0
200.0
0.0
700.0
400.0
3 DATA
19.9
1.1
0.0
79.0
21.0
FINAL
(mn
229.0
305.0
187.0
1.0
722.0
471.0
Md
Ms
PS
Fo
%EA
NET
Ml
-71.0
105.0
-13.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.0
71.0
28.97
27.95
27.44
0.909
2082
METER TEMPERATURE
INLET
(DegF)
89
89
89
89
90
91
91
91
91
91
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
91
91
92
93
93
OUTLET
(DegF)
87
87
87
87
87
87
88
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
AVG.
181
-0.40
0.59
1.87
1037.008
48.532
89
-------
APPENDIX E
DATA AND RESULTS FOR EPA METHODS 3A» 6C, 7E, 10, AND 25A TESTING
RTO STACK
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R1
Starting
07-27-95
Time
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
09:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
O2
%
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
dv
.45
.39
.32
.43
.64
.48
.46
.32
.49
.57
.41
.40
.36
.49
.58
.42
.40
.30
.50
.67
.48
.44
.35
.55
.67
.43
.42
.35
,47
.69
.56
.51
.34
.50
.70
.44
.42
.40
.56
.69
.52
CO 2
% dv
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
.218
.271
.282
.090
.173
.187
.268
.224
.100
.219
.205
.230
.197
.051
.191
.168
.279
.233
.032
.153
.184
.239
.161
.997
.141
.166
.22.0
.189
.990
.088
.100
.165
.145
.021
.107
.151
.182
.124
.989
.104
.139
CO
ppmdv
31.
26.
35.
36.
30.
26.
31.
30.
29.
37.
33.
25.
24.
33.
35.
25,
28.
37.
32.
27.
32.
34.
27.
27.
35.
32.
25.
29.
33.
27.
22.
27.
29.
25,
25.
28.
25.
18.
25.
27.
19.
29
74
54
40
00
51
45
14
22
28
66
31
SO
71
89
46
13
33
47
65
49
69
80
93
16
67
88
16
52
69
15
68
94
13
47
46
25
61
35
19
49
SO2
ppmdv
2.02
1.93
1.85
2.21
2.07
1.29
1.79
1.96
1.85
1.71
2.10
2.21
2.02
1.79
1.74
1.79
1.85
1.79
1.93
2.35
1.48
1.74
1.09
1,32
1.60
1.01
1.54
1.71
1.65
1.15
1.51
1.43
1.57
1.37
1.90
1.71
1.15
1.51
2.05
1.54
1.76
NOX
ppmdv
13
14
12
9
13
13
13
12
9
13
13
14
13
9
12
14
13
12
10
13
13
13
13
10
13
13
14
13
10
14
15
15
13
10
14
13
14
14
11
14
15
.230
.200
.660
.690
.350
.810
.720
.810
.750
.210
.510
.750
.180
.730
.840
.140
.920
.570
.250
.540
.320
.970
.760
.950
.710
.620
.700
.550
.900
.620
.020
.220
.780
.880
.160
.830
.720
.430
.560
.880
.740
voc
ppmwv
4.90
4.48
4.27
4.29
4,30
4.07
3.87
3.85
3.69
3.54
3.62
3.52
3.45
3.23
3.55
3,50
3.26
3.25
3.47
5.27
4.62
3.99
4.04
3.83
3.82
3.88
3.80
3.72
3.57
3.71
3.55
3.28
3.48
3.46.
3.21
3.11
3.17
3.19
2.85
2.83
2.89
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R1
Time
09:57
09:58
09:59
10:00
10:01
10:02
10:03
10:04
10:05
10:06
10:07
10:08
10:09
10:10
10:11
10:12
10:13
10:14
10:15
60 MinAvg
02
% dv
19.45
19.39
19.54
19.65
19.50
19.41
19.32
19.48
19.55
19.42
19.33
19.26
19.42
19.61
19.41
19.41
19.33
19.51
19.59
19.47
CO 2
% dv
1.221
1.154
1.018
1.134
1.152
1.265
1.214
1.060
1.210
1.248
1.375
1.282
1.107
1.198
1.204
1.273
1.194
1.052
1.210
1.166
CO
ppmdv
17.77
24.24
26.28
19.02
18.75
25.73
25.00
19.88
25.71
29.07
24.74
24.37
34.94
32.41
20.06
23.30
28.72
24.56
20.14
27.76
S02
ppmdv
2.10
2.49
2.41
2.07
1.31
1.43
1.34
1.62
1.34
1.51
1.34
1.82
1.68
2.18
1.62
1.65
1.57
2.27
1.74
1.73
NOx
ppmdv
16.160
14.850
11.330
15.420
15.610
15.360
14.700
12.280
15.110
14.510
15.310
14.340
10.690
14.410
15.110
15.710
14.200
11.980
15.160
13.574
VOC
ppmwv
2.76
2.73
2.82
3.05
2.83
2.76
3.04
3.03
2.81
2.84
3.04
3.03
2.85
3.10
3.21
2.80
2.84
3.02
2.94
3.45
Data Corrected for Calibrations
60 MinAvg 19.53 1.113
28.19
1.74
13.648
3.41
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10f25A-R2
Time
12:16
12:17
12:18
12:19
12:20
12:21
12:22
12:23
12:24
12:25
12:26
12:27
12:28
12:29
12:30
12:31
12:32
12:33
12:34
12:35
12:36
12:37
12:38
12:39
12:40
12:41
12:42
12:43
12:44
12:45
12:46
12:47
12:48
12:49
12:50
12:51
12:52
12:53
12:54
12:55
12:56
O2
% dv
19.02
18.90
19.13
19.23
19.08
19.05
19.08
19.25
19.33
19.17
19.05
18.99
19.15
19.21
19.04
19.08
19.01
19.18
19.22
19.10
19.05
19.04
19.21
19.20
19.06
18.99
18.99
19.16
19.14
19.03
19.02
19.00
19.19
19.20
19.08
18.97
19.00
19.20
19.07
18.99
18.88
C02
% dv
1.380
1.299
1.091
1.211
1.202
1.245
1.128
1.002
1.137
1.178
1.289
1.241
1.097
1.217
1.209
1.268
1.182
1.046
1.188
1.176
1.247
1.167
1.080
1.206
1.224
1.285
1.231
1.112
1.197
1.196
1.239
1.172
1.042
1.149
1.202
1.256
1.149
1.125
1.248
1.290
1.360
CO
ppmdv
42.16
50.35
43.00
43.71
39.26
35.24
30.12
35.71
36.57
33.33
40.44
50.92
54,55
49.13
48.00
48.60
46.26
41.46
45.34
48.51
41.25
45.74
55.81
50.67
48.01
48.90
58.56
56.98
49.16
43.61
41.97
41.60
43.45
38.03
38.74
38.86
38.48
41.90
39.67
44.99
45.77
SO 2
ppmdv
1.15
1.17
1.09
1.20
1.25
1.29
1.28
1.13
1.22
1.21
0.97
0.89
1.24
1.17
1.28
1.40
1.20
1.06
1.24
1.46
1.38
1.42
1.26
1.58
1.67
1.43
1.38
1.61
1.51
1.11
1.15
1.24
1.82
1.44
1.18
1.21
1.25
1.38
1.18
1.35
0.80
NOX
ppmdv
16.400
14.390
12.060
16.000
15.760
16.910
16.270
13.230
16.610
15.790
16.340
14.840
11.870
15.740
15.510
16.020
15.540
13.400
16.480
15,930
17.430
15.330
13.240
16.410
16.300
16.350
15.200
13.410
16.750
16.020
17.290
16.220
14.550
17.630
16.280
17.630
15.510
14.930
17.340
16.210
16.830
voc
ppmwv
1.07
1.42
1.57
1.92
1.41
1.37
1.46
1.22
1.34
1.47
1.48
1.64
1.91
2.09
1.86
1.92
2.11
2.09
1.87
1.95
2.15
2.20
2.03
2.33
2.35
2.25
2.29
2.62
2.53
2.22
2.16
2.18
2.09
2.20
1.99
1.99
2.11
1.97
1.95
1.73
1.80
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-:R2
Time
12:57
12:58
12:59
13:00
13:01
13:02
13:03
13:04
13:05
13:06
13:07
13:08
13:09
13:10
13:11
13:12
13:13
13:14
13:15
60 MinAvg
O2
% dv
18.93
19.24
19.08
19.02
19.05
19.03
19.24
19.13
19.07
18.91
18.96
19.17
18.93
18.86
18.74
18.86
19.10
18.87
18.86
19.06
CO 2
% dv
1.210
1.140
1.206
1.157
1.184
1.107
1.079
1.179
1.221
1.265
1.178
1.250
1.348
1.427
1.433
1.210
1.326
1.360
1.343
1.210
CO
ppmdv
48.53
47.68
40.89
33.06
28.24
29.34
27.40
29.12
30.63
35.90
46.75
61.08
59.07
61.74
62.67
69.09
75.20
74.40
62.51
45.64
S02
ppmdv
1.35
1.09
1.54
1.22
1.06
1.15
1.15
1.21
1.42
1.60
1.09
1.42
1.22
0.97
1.02
1.06
0.92
0.77
1.10
1.24
NOX
ppmdv
15.250
14.840
17.910
17.770
18.310
17.280
17.090
18.600
18.490
17.680
14.940
15.250
17.100
16.890
16.510
12.960
16.190
16.440
17.620
15.985
VOC
ppmwv
1.79
1.93
1.87
1.73
1.60
1.38
1.47
1.25
1.19
1.39
1.48
1.73
2.03
2.02
2.03
1.99
2.25
2.25
2.33
1.87
Data Corrected for Calibrations
60 MinAvg 19.12 1.168 46.40
1.26
16.213
1.93
-------
Wieelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R3
Starting
07-27-95
Time
14:31
14:32
14:33
14:34
14:35
14:36
14:37
14:38
14:39
14:40
14:41
14:42
14:43
14:44
14:45
14:46
14:47
14:48
14:49
14:50
14:51
14:52
14:53
14:54
14:55
14:56
14:57
14:58
14:59
15:00
15:01
15:02
15:03
15:04
15:05
15:06
15:07
15:08
15:09
15:10
15:11
O2
% dv
18.84
19.13
18.91
18.88
18.82
18.86
19.12
18.90
18.91
18.90
18.91
19.10
18.94
18.94
18.69
18.71
18.96
19.00
19.01
18.81
18.80
19.09
19.04
18.93
18.69
18.82
19.00
18.97
18.89
18.57
18.75
18.88
18.89
18.83
18.59
18.85
18.94
18.92
18.78
18.59
18.89
CO2
% dv
1.041
1.103
1.144
1.150
1.160
1.022
1.106
1.142
1.106
1.105
1.013
1.058
1.082
1.165
1.281
1.094
1.068
1.055
1.117
1.206
1.039
1.027
1.046
1.195
1.218
1.041
1.053.
1.096
1,293
1.304
1.122
1.135
1.121
1.297
1.230
1.068
1.093
1,120
1.333
1.205
1.081
CO
ppmdv
98.40
100.40
89.20
90.00
93.80
82.40
85.20
83.70
76.90
63.67
67.93
76.30
58.96
54.40
67.20
68.04
56.59
55.41
68.42
66.81
58.28
58.66
70.20
68.12
62.08
75.60
75.70
71.30
70.70
90.70
97.50
90.80
89.20
91.30
86.10
78.60
84.00
85.40
79.90
82.50
100.40
SO2
ppmdv
0.59
0.67
0.68
0.59
0.64
0.66
0.53
0.77
0.21
0.30
-0,08
0,25
0.17
-0.04
-0.12
-0.48
-0.05
-0.31
0.08
0.06
0.53
0.50
0.34
-0.31
-0.06
-0.20
-0.34
0.20
0.64
0.64
0.63
0.57
0.48
0.45
0.32
0.31
0.05
0.14
0.46
0.42
-0.17
NOx
ppmdv
12.020
13.680
14.770
14.490
14.190
12.220
14,360
14.800
14.330
14.880
13.320
14.760
15.250
15.770
17.470
14.310
15.450
14.760
15.260
16,220
13.370
14.080
14.590
16.820
16.160
13.190
14.270
14.010
16.490
16.190
12.910
14.140
14.320
16.580
15.300
13.600
15.150
14.520
16.900
15.480
12.940
VOC
ppmwv
3.13
3.59
3.46
3.33
3.33
3.29
3.28
2.96
3.00
3.12
2.60
2,64
2.72
2.53
2.32
2.33
2.55
2.30
2,14
2.43
2.45
2.32
2.14
2.43
2.61
2.37
2.48
2.63
2.75
2.68
2.76
3.01.
2.83
2.82
3.08
2.95
2.78
2.66
3.08
3.02
2.89
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R3
Time
15:12
15:13
15:14
15:15
15:16
15:17
15:18
15:19
15:20
15:21
15:22
15:23
15:24
15:25
15:26
15:27
15:28
15:29
15:30
60 MinAvg
02
% dv
18.91
18.81
18.78
18.55
18.73
18.78
18.78
18.58
18.63
18.96
18.94
18.87
18.66
18.62
18.85
18.98
19.00
18.74
18.73
18.85
CO 2
% dv
1.114
1.128
1.333
1.241
1.128
1.116
1.220
1.289
1.099
1.048
1.094
1.155
1.285
1.180
1.021
1.009
1.102
1.245
1.064
1.137
CO
ppmdv
99.20
94.30
98.40
99.40
78.80
59.25
56.11
56.44
53.05
62.08
75.00
78.90
57.61
56.43
57.10
41.12
36.04
50.30
49.82
73.84
S02
ppmdv
-0.37
-0.34
-0.13
-0.12
-0.24
-0.49
-0.19
-0.20
-0.26
-0.44
-0.09
-0.26
-0.59
-0.20
-0.32
-0.34
-0.13
-0.32
-0.19
0.09
NOX
ppmdv
13.900
13.630
16.690
16.460
15.210
17.220
18.700
18.460
14.570
12.930
14.260
14.930
17.710
17.690
15.500
16.800
16.540
18.480
14.860
15.131
VOC
ppmwv
3.04
2.98
3.06
3.02
3.35
3.82
2.39
2.35
2.50
2.30
2.14
2.25
2.51
2.18
2.01
2.14
1.78
1.59
1.71
2.68
Data Corrected for Calibrations
60 MinAvg 18.99 1.120
75.02
0.10
15.336
2.81
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungatmon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10-R4
Starting
07-27-95
Tine
16:51
16:52
16:53
16:54
16:55
16:56
16:57
16:58
16:59
17:00
17:01
17:02
17:03
17:04
17:05
17:06
17:07
17:08
17:09
17:10
17:11
17:12
17:13
17:14
17:15
17:16
17:17
17:18
17:19
17:20
17:21
17:22
17:23
17:24
17:25
17:26
17:27
17:28
17:29
17:30
17:31
O2
% dv
13.64
18.46
18.24
18.48
18.57
18.57
18.43
18.26
18.47
18.59
18.54
18.37
18.18
18.40
18.45
18.42
18.23
18.13
18.44
18.42
18.34
18.12
18.07
18.30
18.29
18.24
18.06
18.02
18.31
18.30
18.35
18.14
18 . 14
18.34
18.27
18.15
17.80
17.85
18.08
18.08
18.09
CO 2
% dv
1.010
1.194
1.122
1.013
1.004
1.041
1.184
1.109
0.973
0.986
1.043
1.219
1.154
1.046
1.045
1.096
1.235
1.073
0.989
1.037
1.123
1.223
1.121
1.087
1.100
1.150
1.269
1.073
1.026
0.994
1.024
1.103
0.968
1.011
1,084
1.272
1.358
1.152
1.114
1.079
1.155
CO
ppmdv
32.17
36.59
48.62
48.18
35.97
39.10
43.19
35.17
36.77
42.00
42.24
35.77
40.41
48.60
37.37
31.03
37.14
37.44
30.68
28.93
37.26
33.12
29.15
40.19
41.18
38.08
31.58
39.37
36.32
24.42
23.38
27.84
25.29
24.40
33.78
40.57
41.93
44.67
50.12
38.98
27.41
SO2
ppmdv
-0.21
-0.23
-0.08
-0.02
-0.34
-0.21
-0.09
-0.24
-0.14
-0.20
-0.28
-0.16
-0.28
-0.20
-0.08
-0.08
-0.01
-0.12
-0.14
-0.17
-0.20
-0.04
-0.30
-0.12
-0.20
-0.24
-0.31
0.10
-0.20
-0.14
-0.01
-0.16
-0.04
0.10
-0.10
-0.32
-0.20
-0.23
-0.09
-0.32
-0.26
NOX
ppmdv
18.170
19.740
16.330
14.600
16.920
17.390
19.140
17.800
15.000
16.630
16.220
18.690
16.620
14.800
16.780
16.810
18.920
16.060
16.450
17.360
17.090
18.950
15.830
15.160
15.110
15.990
18.380
14.900.
16.150
17.780
19.510
19.720
15.060
16.200
15.790
16.250
17.320
14.320
15.160
15.390
18.270
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10-R4
Time
17:32
17:33
17:34
17:35
17:36
17:37
17:38
17:39
17:40
17:41
17:42
17:43
17:44
17:45
55 MinAvg
O2
% dv
17.86
18.01
18.20
18.15
18.04
17.75
17.91
17.93
17.84
17.72
17.57
17.90
18.04
18.07
18,19
CO2
% dv
1.157
0.958
0.977
1.007
1.213
1.210
1.108
1.190
1.217
1.409
1.202
0.990
0.965
0.960
1.102
CO
ppmdv
24.57
22.55
21.18
21.65
24.09
32.67
41.36
48.66
51.35
49.36
41.54
29.89
23.18
20.57
35.44
S02
ppmdv
-0.27
0.08
-0.20
-0.30
-0.27
-0.20
-0.19
-0.32
-0.16
-0.16
0,01
-0.27
0.06
-0.21
-0.16
NOX
ppmdv
18.750
15.520
17.070
16.710
18.390
16.110
13.140
14.170
13.880
16.550
15.590
13.770
16.140
17.150
16.576
Data Corrected for Calibrations
55 MinAvg 18.41 1.089 35.94
•0.31
33.218
-------
APPENDIX F
EQUATIONS AND CALCULATIONS
-------
EPA METHODS 2-4 CALCULATIONS
1. Metered Gas Sample Volume at Standard Conditions
P.
x 528 x
29.92
B
13.6
TL + 460
'JB
2. Gas Volume of Water Vapor Collected in Impinger Liquid
- X 0.047 15
4 . Moisture Volume Fraction in Flue Gas
+
D _
*^-laf^\ "*" 'i
vsy(scd)
5. Moisture Volume Percentage in Flue Gas
%H20 - BwsxlOO
6. Absolute Pressure of Flue Gas
P - P. +
* * 13.6
7. Nitrogen Content of Flue Gas
%N2 - 100 - (%CO2 + %O2 + %CC)
8. Dry Molecular Weight of Flue Gas
Md - 0.44x%C02 + 0.32x%O2 + 0.28x (%.W2 + %CC»)
9. Wet Molecular Weight of Flue Gas
t^f M JCf v I 1 —• J^ i ^ T ft v H
10. Fuel Factor Based on Flue Gas Composition
20.9 - %O2
%C02
-------
EPA METHODS 2-4 CALCUIATIONS - continued
11. Excess Air of Flue Gas
%O,-0.5%CO
ftpa xlOO
0.264%tf2- (%02-0.5%CO)
12. Average Gas Velocity, ft/sec
13. Area of Round Duct or Stack
A - "XL*2
* " 4x144
14. Area of Rectangular Duct
(rotmd ducts)
a _ L x W (rectangular ducts)
144
15. Actual Volumetric Flow Rate of Flue Gas
16. Flow Rate of Flue Gas at Standard Temperature and Pressure
n 0 J P5x528
3 [
-------
NOMENCLATURE FOR EPA METHODS 2-4
AP
Fo
Y
L
MO
static
m(std)
V,
wc(std)
wsg(std)
W
Wf
Wi
%o2
%coz
%co
%N2
%EA
Stack area, ft*
Moisture volume fraction
Pitot tube coefficient («0.84)
Stack diameter, inches
Average meter orifice pressure, in.W.C.
Pitot tube differential pressure, in.W.C.
Combustion factor
Meter calibration factor, gamma
Length of rectangular stack or duct, inches
Dry molecular weight, Ib/lb-mole
Wet molecular weight, Ib/lb-mole
Barometric pressure, in.Hg
Absolute stack pressure, in.Hg
Average static pressure, in.W.C.
Actual gas flow rate, acfm
Standard gas flow rate, scfm
Dry standard gas flow rate, dscfm
Average meter temperature, °F
Average stack temperature, °F
Final impinger volume, ml
Initial impinger volume, ml
Uncorrected metered gas volume, dcf
Corrected gas volume, dscf
Average gas velocity, ft/sec
Gas volume of water caught in impingers, scf
Gas volume of water caught in silica gel, scf
Width of rectangular stack or duct, inches
Final silica gel mass, grams
Initial silica gel mass, grams
Dry volumetric concentration of O2, %dv
Dry volumetric concentration of CO2, %dv
Dry volumetric concentration of CO, %dv
Dry volumetric concentration of N2/ %dv
Percent excess air
-------
gPA METHOD 5 GRAVIMETRIC CALCULATIONS
1. PM Collected in Probe Wash -
2. Applicable Acetone Blank Correction - B,
" [ ( Wa
tin&l
X •
apw
VU
3. Maximum Allowable Acetone Blank -
Bluoax - 0.7845 x 0.00001 x vptf
4. Actual Probe Wash Blank Correction - B
Bpv - MINIMUM [Bapv, BaMX]
5. PM Collected on Filter - M,
care
6.
Total PM Collected for Method 5 Calculations -
~ B
pv
NOMENCLATURE
B.
amax
B
apw
v1
v!
ffnal
tare
final
tar*
Maximum allowable acetone blank correction, based
on weight of acetone in probe wash, grams
Acetone blank correction based on residue of
blank, grams
Acetone blank correction actually used, grams
Total mass of particulate in train corrected for
acetone blank, grams
Mass gain of filter, grams
Probe wash residue, grams
Liquid volume of acetone blank, ml
Liquid volume of probe wash, ml
Final weight of beaker containing acetone blank
residue, grams
Tare weight of beaker containing acetone blank
residue, grams
Final weight of filter, grams
Tare weight of filter, grams
Final weight of beaker containing probe wash
residue, grams
Tare weight of beaker containing probe wash
residue, grams
-------
METHOD 202 GRAVIMETRIC CALCOTATIONS
l. Organic CPM -
2, Organic Blank Correction - B
3. Inorganic CPM (Uncorrected for NH4 and Cl ions) - Miu
V4
4 a
4. Inorganic Blank Correction -
5. Inorganic Correction for Ammonia addition - n,
0.020502 * Cso
6. Inorganic Correction for NH4C1 in Sample -
1.509 x c x 100
7. Inorganic CPM (Corrected for NH4 and Cl ions) - Mlc
8. Total CPM -
, = M. - m - m_.
ic iu a Cl
= **.
-------
METHOD 202 GRAVTMETRIC NOMENeTATTTPE
Bo
Mie
Miu
V.
ib
final
j.b tare
i.) final
tare
(W0b) final
(W
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
1. Particulate Concentration - c.
£7 j <— "'
-sd
7000
453.593
2. Particulate Concentration Corrected to 7% O2
20.9 - %O2
3. Particulate Concentration Corrected to 12% CO, -. C,.fl2%CO,
4. Particulate Concentration Corrected to 50% Excess Air -
. c x 1QQ •*
sd 15Q
Csd@50%EA
5. Particulate Mass Rate - Mp
go
x £x
6. Isokinetic Variation - %ISO
%lso -
Psx vsxAnx time* (1 -
NOMENCLATURE
An = Nozzle area, ft2
C^ == Particulate concentration, grains/dscf
Dn = Nozzle diameter, inches
ZM, = Summation of PM collected in sample train, grams
M = Mass rate of particulate emissions, Ib/hr
Pe = Absolute stack pressure, in.Hg
Q d = Dry standard gas flow rate, dscfm
time = Net sampling time, minutes
Ts = Average stack temperature, °P
Vm(std) = Corrected gas volume, dscf
vs = Average gas velocity, ft/sec
%O2 = Dry volumetric concentration of O2, %dv
%CO2 = Dry volumetric concentration of C02, %dv
%EA — Percent excess air
%Iso = Percent isokinetics
-------
ORGANIC POLLUTANT EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
1. Concentration
mi 0.84948
C = x
1 V
2 . Mass Emissions Rate
M =
106 * 453.593
NOMENCLATURE
= concentration of analyte i, ppmdv
= mass of analyte i collected, /ig
= mass emissions rate of analyte i, Ib/hr
= molecular weight of analyte i, g/g-mole
Qsd = dry standard gas flow rate, dscfm
Vn(atd) = corrected gas volume, dscf
453.593 = grams per pound
0.84948 = std. cubic feet per gram mole of ideal gas
105 = micrograms per gram
60 = minutes per hour
-------
GASEOUS EMISSIONS MONXTORIJJG CLCULATIONS
1. HOURLY EMISSIONS RATE - Mt
M ..=
' 106*0.84948*453.593
NOMENCLATURE
i = NO,, S02, CO, or total hydrocarbons (as propane)
MJ. = Mass emissions rate of i, Ib/hr
CL =» Concentration of i in stack gas, ppmdv
MWj. - Molecular weight of i
= 46.01 for N02
- 28.01 for CO
= 64.06 for SO2
= 44.10 for propane
QJd = Average flue gas flow rate, dscfm
0.84948 = Molar volume of ideal gas, ft3/mole
453.593 = grains per pound
10s = parts per million
60 = minutes per hour
-------
INSTRUMENT ANALYZER CALCULATION^?
1. Analyzer Calibration Error is determined by:
Ef £^Z x 100
2. System Bias is determined by:
BB *-£ x 100
3. Calibration Drift is determined by:
*>:
Dc -£ x 100
4. The Adjusted Data Value is determined by:
C.
C - (C-C \ x
^- V(- c' x
ma
-------
Nomenclature•
Ae = the analyzer response for calibration gas standard
BS = Sampling system bias, % analyzer span
C = the average gas concentration of the analyte
indicated by the gas analyzer
Cg = the actual gas cylinder concentration value
C = the adjusted gas concentration of the analyte
y os
Cffl = the average of initial and final system
calibration responses for the upscale calibration
gas
CM = the actual concentration of the upscale
calibration gas used for system calibration
CQ == the average of initial and final system
calibration responses for the zero gas
Cs = the system response for calibration gas introduced
remotely at the sample probe (zero or upscale)
Dc = Calibration drift, % analyzer span
Ee = Analyzer calibration error, % analyzer span
Fe *= Final system calibration response value
Ic *= Initial system calibration response value
V$ - Span value of analyzer
-------
METHOD 25A EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
1. Dry VOC Concentration
2. Hourly emissions rate
106xO.84948x453.593
EPA METHOD 25A EMISSIONS NOMENCLATURE
CM — Wet concentration of total gaseous VOC's in stack
gas, ppmwv
B^ = stack gas moisture fraction
M = Emissions rate of VOC's, Ib/hr
Cc = Dry concentration of total gaseous VOC's in stack
gas, ppmdv
Qsd = Total gas flow rate, dscfm
MWf = Molecular weight of reporting standard for VOC's,
grams/mole
= 44.097 for propane
= 12.011 for carbon
60 « Minutes per hour
0.84948 == Molar volume of ideal gas, ft3/mole
453.593 — grains per pound
10* = parts per million
-------
APPENDIX G
RAW FIELD DATA FOR EPA METHOD 5/202
RTO STACK
-------
Revision 1
SAMPUHS OATA SHEET
03/16W
PAOE *
3,1
FACILITY: _
5 TIME:
TEST LOCATIOH:
DATE:
END TIME:
POLLUTAXT:
-al
POINT
SAWUI
TIME
TIME
STATIC
STACX
TEMP,
STACX
METES
4N
ft
DM fEKP.
INLET
DCN TEKP.
OITVET
MPIN&ER
TEW.
Ftuca
TEMP.
METEB
VAC.
S2.
L
-
(11
So
C3
r
fif
r
57
•73
r
.57
a?
r
.7C
r
ai
/-.fl
r
M
ni
3-3
35*2^
£
6C
A '
/.?©
zn-
C3
r
42.
c
4
36C5"
r
sc
r
246.
Iff
/I/
61
6
r
a
cr
2,4?
LI,*-
37Z7
f/
r
(Bo
/.ffi
3751-
f/
cc
377-3
66
cc
37?-
fi
cc
CHAIN OF OJSTOOT:
LEAK CHECK:
CONTAINER
I
I
II
I
1
I
|
if
SAMPLE 1.0.
DESCRIPTION
VACUUM
RATE
/5
O.ooS
/*-
$005
IMPIMCER CONTENTS:
IMPIHCEft
11
n
n
• v.
«5
*&
INITIAL
/Oo
/oo
^oo
o
^Oi
FINAL
ar
M
(01
O-S"
ajm
MOZZLE *
PITOT f
8CX I.D.
GAMMA
FILTER
TECH.
-------
Revision 1.
03/16/94
ISCietMETlC
OAT*
FACILITY:
TEST LOCATION:
DATE:
r
START TIKE:
EKO TIM;
POLLUTANT:
RUK I.D.:
- N
POINT
SAMPLE
TIMC
TIKE
STATIC
STACX
TEXP.
STACX
MCTEK
OGN VQLUHI
ftT
0« TEMP.
IXLET
OGM TBO».
OUTtET
MPINGElt
TEW.
FILTER
TEMP,
VAC.
C?
6?
/r?
1*
T
en
Cf
c/
/&
S6
/-Cf
f
f/
a
u
f r
C3
63
C,
LCI
3?
,5-?
ft,
if
i
9C.
c
cr
JLf?
.O
cr
a
D
/So
f?
6°
cc
O
f-w
fY
CC,
cf
-2-
ff
CHAIH OF CUSTODY:
LEAK CHECK:
CONTAINER SAMPLE I.D.
DESCRIPTION
VACUUM
RATE
/C
.00$
\o
,oo<
I
WIHttR CQHTEHTS:
IMPINGES INITIAL
•1
91
n
K
FINAL
NOZ2LE *
PITOT 9
BOX 1.0.
GAMMA
FILTER
TECH.
-------
Revision 1
IStXIMgTIC SmglMC OATA SHggT
TEST LOCATION:
DATE;
TIME:
TOLLUTAJIT:
RUN I.O.:
03/16/94
PAGE J_ OF /
. ,5". t 3
OIMT
SAMPLE
TIME
TIHE
STATIC
STACX
TEW.
5TAOC
NITER
OEM VOLUME
ft*
DOI TIXP.
INLET
OCM TtKP.
OUTLET
KPIMCER
TW.
FILTH
TEW.
KtltX
VAC.
!(>*>
•(J
c.
a-/
r
o/
an
r
c
.
Wt. 7
fc
1
r
r
(1
r
ft-
/uo
JX
_££.
-L
/•if
. e
ff
r
.5-7
/a-
?f
r
A7/
VCfe.3
r
hi
ff
r
-------
APPENDIX H
RAW FIELD DATA FOR BIF METHOD 0011
RTO STACK
-------
OJ/16/54
S4."P'.iNC
r'ACtHTY: t—
STA3T TIME: 0 ^ .' /
TEST UCCATIC*:
£. K
WGE | Cf j
CATS;
END TIME:
POLLUTANT:
POINT
SAMPLE
TISs
TIME
STATIC
STA«
TEMP.
STACK
vauMS
W "EM?.
i.NlsT
D2.1
CUTLET
TLMP.
FILTH
TEMP.
VAC.
71
/Y
0-10
/o
PS
ff I
130,5
Jl
1/74
7-24.1
ft1/
12
3 I 0,7
I h77
a
.In
ni
^ 5
v.7
779.03
JO'.lo
ISO
-3
7¥/,l I
ri7
(0
41
17
ft
cs
1
0-61
4.
0.63
i
Q.53L /;
ill
7C10-
166,5-
s
CHAIH
/A
OISTCOY:
LEAK CSEOC:
SAMPLE I.D.
DESCIIPTICH
VAC.TJ4
RATE
15
O.o^
10 i
I
I 1
i i
1HPINOSS CCMTE.NTS:
INITIAL FINAL
I —»,Q «r
NOZZLE i
?ITOT *
XX 1.3.
GAJWA r
o «*• n a
-------
Revision
s
loo
D
^OOe
J
FINAL
I <7 '
1 I ^jQlNCy'
^
^R
MQZ2LE *
PITOT *
BOX I.D.
GAHKA T
.H3
PBAU
FILTER
TECH.
O. IS
U5
/I
0-?W
I-$M"75
*9-^7-^
/K.H^f
"77» y
-------
Revision t
03/16/V*
ACIUTY:
ISOKINETIC SAHPtlNC PATA SHEET
TEST LQCAne*: £~T& STtfC //
PAGE __ Of _
a. •7/9.T
TK... HUE:
Offl TINE:
PQILUTAMT;
I.O.j
POINT
SAMPLE
T1H£
TIKE
STATIC
STACK
TENP.
STACK
METEI
OCM
VCLUKS
T
OCX TEMP,
IHUET
BGM TEXP.
OUTLET
WINQEX
num
TSXP.
D
'H-fl
J±
It
- 01
in
ll
0-"70
1,17
/a
O.C/H
f
$ c
2-0
2.SC
a-i
97
0,3
ff
M
33
u
O
••Hi
0,^7
0,65
L!
97
£>£>
T
lot*
V
S"
(OS
CS
s
/ oq
103
/on
7.5-
hi.
ci
CHAIM OF CUSTODY;
LEAK CHIOC:
COMTAINER
SAMPLE i.o.
DESCRIPTION
YAQA*
RATE
!.<>
0,006
io
0.00%
\
1MPINCE8 CONTENTS:
IMPtNCER
01
02
03
•4
n
«6
INITIAL
\ &t)
f 05
0
9ofl(?
J
FINAL
^3d
lift
-z.
•zrt-S
NOZZLE t
PITOT #
BOX I.D.
GAMMA f
BA*
HLTEH
TECH.
M
-------
APPENDIX I
RAW FIELD DATA FOR MDI TESTING
RTO STACK
-------
Revision 1
DATA.
03/16/94
PAGE / ; OF J__
FACILITY: __ ___
S; TIKE: [6 ISO
TEST LOCATIOH:
BATE;
EMD TIKE:
RUN I.O.:
wutT
SAMPLE
TIKE
TIRE
STATIC
STACK
TEXP.
STACK
NETEX
OGM VOLUME
VOL
*
OOf TEKP.
IHLET
am TEW.
OUTLET
WIHCEX
FltTH
TEW,
VAC.
/to
215
0-50
12±
/61
f
/a
-------
FACILITY
Revision 1
: L-fl>ma i<\S» n < C
ISCtlMETC
G B*T» SHJET
PASE
y Of i_
TEST LOCATIffli:
START TIME:
END TIKE:
POLLUTAMT:
DATE:
1.0.s
POINT
SAMPLI
TIKE
TIME
STATIC
STACK
T&P.
STACK
A?
VOLUME
fln£
INUT
SSM TE».
(JUTLfT
mra
TOP.
urns
VAC.
I/
PffW-
O.B*
r?
;o
91
7?
0-49^
-o/fo
2.Q
7 "7
f
m
17-S
10
fi/i
3°
try
it
ro
1C
ffo
10
.37.5
If
f
f
gj.5
93
v/5"
I
6. $5
-3
3
£6
/'fir
Jo
o
3
63
±
$7
CHAIN OF oltSr: H
LEAK CHECK:
CONTAINER SAMPLE 1.0.
DESCRIPTIOI
VACUUM
RATE
/c
O.flW
/X
0,V*1
1
IKPINGER CONTENTS:
IMPIXGER INITIAL
11
f2
•4
05
C6
FINAL
37 £
31;
NOZZIE t
P1TDT f
BOX I.Q.
CAKKA
4-L
FILTER
TECH.
HA**
-------
Revision 1
SAXPUHG DATA SHEET
AC1LITT;
^ ..-• •
03/16/94
WC£ / OF
TIST LOCATION
: /?TQ.._«5'rc- t
BATE:
JTX TIME:
E*D TIKI:
POLLUTAMT: /TlK I
RUH I.D.; X'TO
_£
T« 3
POINT
SAXPUE
TIKI
TIME
STATIC
STACX
rew.
STACK
tf
KETER
VO.UKE
j
001 TEMP.
IMLET
OUTLET
KPIHCER
TEXP.
FILTEA
TEW».
KETXJUJ
VAC.
u
-21
11
3.
/o
5
l-o S"
19
7-5
0.6 (
7
/o
«3
11
Co
2.0
7
£3
a
2T.4
€7
IS
1C?
b a
I
'
0.CS
30
/o
, f
Kf
/o a./.
£7
1
0-Sl
Zl.l
US
rO
Co
in-*
62.
63
1*
If?
ffl
f
CHAIM OF CUSTODY:
LEAK CHECK:
1037,00?
CCMTAIMER
|
1
R
1
!!
SAMPLE I.D.
DESCRIPTION
-
VACJJX
RATE
iS
0,0 /&
/-x
^COj?
J
IMPIHGER CONTENTS:
IMP!MGE1
#1
n
«
«4
»5
«6
INITIAL
?{3O
OOC?
200
0
cZOO^
*f
HIUL
7^q
^05"
f97
I
•2-50
t^
HOZ2LE 1
PITOT 0
BOX I.D.
OAMMA T
»H3
PSAR
FILTER
TECH.
(?tP-^
^7
||
O.f<52?
^<3«rxs~
10-M1
^U
-------
INTEGRATED BAG ANALYSIS FOR %02 AND %C02
INSTRUMENT ANALYZER METHOD
O2/CO2 CALIBRATION
O2 SPAN = 25% C02SPAN=20%
O2 MONITOR ID: 1
CALIBRATION GAS VALUES
ZERO
M1D= >06»
HIGH= ZZM
ANALYZER RESPONSE
ZERO 0
MID= /O.O
HIGH = zz- 1
DATE: -r/SS/^J-
TIME: -&s& /^-'so
C02 MONITQR-ID: /
CALIBRATION GAS ID
-100-9
vi^zS
ANALYZER CALIBRATION ERROR
O
10,0^
i-i-iS-
SOURCE: _JgjZ^- -yrAe* —
LOCATION: .|
%O2 Zo. o
%O2 TCI i
AVERAGE •£ 0-9*1
,DATE OF TEST: ~7/z Z/^ r
RUN ID: £io-r*o/9*-ftz.
%C02 /-d>
%CO2 /. d>
%C02 /-^>
AVERAGE /-O
)Fo FACTOR:
LOCATION: KT TfA&£
%02 / S>-9
%O2 i
-------
APPENDIX J
CEMS ANALYZER CALIBRATION DATA AND SAMPLING SYSTEM CALIBRATION
DRIFT DATA AND RESULTS
RTO STACK
-------
Starting
07-27-95
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
Local Calibration
Time
07:10
07:11
07:12
07:13
07:14
07:15
07:16
07:17
07:18
07:19
07:20
07:21
07:22
07:23
07:24
07:25
07:26
07:27
07:28
07:29
07:30
07:31
07:32
07:33
07:34
07:35
07:36
07:37
07:38
07:39
07:40
07:41
O2
% dv
0.02C
0.05
15.88
22.08
22.09C
22.00
12.70
10.02C
8.81
0.72
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.07
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.06
-0.03
CO 2
% dv
0.033C
2.116
17.510
17.290
17.270C
14.250
10.040
10.030C
1.553
0.074
0.063
0.061
0.053
0.065
0.060
0.065
0.063
0.069
0.064
0.060
0.051
0.042
0.033
0.034
0.035
0.036
0.044
0.035
0.035
0.032
0.036
0.035
CO
ppmdv
-0.01C
0.02
-0.04
0.03
0.03
0.01
-0.14
-0.01
223.30
882.00
887.00
898.00
895. OOC
789.00
578.20
577.10
584. 50C
491.80
294.80
292. 30C
292.10
152.00
0.64
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.64
0.97
0.03
0.08
0.38
-0.03
S02
ppmdv
1.20C
2.21
0.98
1.57
1.57
1.40
1.57
1.17
1.20
1.54
1.62
1.79
1.51
2.02
1.03
2.05
1.65
1.71
2.07
1.37
2.13
206.20
224. OOC
148.50
91.00
92.90C
52.12
3.98
2.78
1.40
1.60
1.03
NOX
ppmdv
-0.115C
-0.054
-0.146
-0.160
-0.180
-0.208
-0.242
-0.273
-0.289
-0.321
-0.339
-0.351
-0.386
-0.386
-0.417
-0.429
-0.445
-0.414
-0.425
-0.457
-0.456
-0.481
-0.497
-0.247
-0.383
-0.419
45.920
173.600
227.700C
142.500
141.100
149.600C
-------
Whee labr at or / LP/ Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack outlet
Local Calibration (VOC)
Starting
07-27-95
Time
08:52
08:53
08:54
08:55
08:56
08:57
08:58
08:59
09:00
09:01
09:02
09:03
09:04
09:05
09:06
09:07
VOC
ppmdv
0.04C
0.21
57.40
67.01
83.70C
84.20
84.50
70.20
44.89
44.65C
53.89
48.46
33.13
25.72
25.32
25.31C
-------
rker Description Display Average
2 Data was Absent from original raw data file. V
C Local Calibration .V
• Data was not used in calculated parameter averages.
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R1
Calibrations:
[SO2 ] Span Value = 225
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 94.60
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 821
LOW Cal. Response — -0.00 HIGH Cal. Response *» 94.32
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1041
LOW Cal. Response - -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 94.12
LOW System Drift = -0.00 % HIGH System Drift = -0.09 %
[C02 ] Span Value = 20
LOW Calibration Gas — 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 10.09
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 821
LOW Cal. Response = 0.06 HIGH Cal. Response - 9.89
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1041 '
LOW Cal. Response = 0.11 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.86
LOW System Drift - 0.22 % HIGH System Drift = -0.13 %
[NOx ] Span Value = 250
LOW Calibration Gas - 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 150.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> ,821
LOW Cal. Response = 0.19 HIGH Cal. Response = 150.00
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1041
LOW Cal. Response = -0.31 HIGH Cal. Response - 149.65
LOW System Drift = -0.20 % HIGH System Drift = -0.14 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LF/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R1
Calibrations:
[O2 ] Span Value *• 25
LOW Calibration Gas =» 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas » 9.86
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 821
LOW Cal. Response = 0.04 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.82
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1041
LOW Cal. Response = 0.03 HIGH Cal. Response «= 9.87
LOW System Drift = -0.02 % HIGH System Drift = 0.18 %
(CO ] Span Value = 1000
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 594.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 821
LOW Cal. Response = 0.04 HIGH Cal. Response - 585.01
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1041
LOW Cal. Response ~ -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.19
LOW System Drift = -0.00 % HIGH System Drift - -0.08 %
[THC ] Span Value = 100
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas *= 44.80
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> . 900
LOW Cal, Response = -0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 45.76
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1052
LOW Cal. Response = -0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 44,81
LOW System Drift = 0.00 % HIGH System Drift = -0.95 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R2
Calibrations:
[S02 ] Span Value = 225
LOW calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 94.60
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1041
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 94.12
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1334
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 94.02
LOW System Drift = -0.00 % HIGH System Drift = -0.04 %
[C02 ] Span Value =20
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 10.09
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME --> 1041
LOW Cal. Response = 0.11 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.86
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1334
LOW Cal. Response = 0.06 HIGH Cal. Response - 9.78
LOW System Drift = -0.26 % HIGH System Drift = -0.41 %
[NOx ] Span Value = 250
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration .Gas = 150.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> '1041
LOW Cal. Response = -0.31 HIGH Cal. Response = 149.65
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1334
LOW Cal. Response <= 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 148.70
LOW System Drift = 0.13 % 'HIGH System Drift = -0.38 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTQ Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-R2
Calibrations:
[02 ] Span Value » 25
LOW Calibration Gas - o.oo HIGH Calibration Gas = 9.86
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1041
LOW Cal. Response = 0.03 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.87
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1334
LOW Cal. Response = 0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.81
LOW System Drift =* -0.11 % HIGH System Drift = -0.24 %
[CO ] Span Value = 1000
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 594.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1041
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.19
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1334
LOW Cal. Response - 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.34
LOW System Drift = 0.00 % HIGH System Drift = 0.02 %
[THC ] Span Value = 100
LOW Calibration Gas ~ 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 44.80
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1052
LOW Cal. Response = -0.00 HIGH Cal. Response - 44.81
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1359
LOW Cal. Response = -0.12 HIGH Cal. Response - 44.60
LOW System Drift - -0.12 % HIGH System Drift = -0.22 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A, 6C,7E, 10 , 25A-R3
Calibrations:
[SO2 ] Span Value = 225
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 94.60
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1334
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 94.02
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1547
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 93.89
LOW System Drift = -0.00 % HIGH System Drift ~ -0.06 %
[C02 ] Span Value - 20
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas - . 10.09
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1334
LOW Cal. Response = 0.06 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.78
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1547
LOW Cal. Response = 0.07 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.66
LOW System Drift » 0.09 % HIGH System Drift = -0.61 %
[NOx ] Span Value = 250
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 150.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1334
LOW Cal. Response = 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 148.70
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1547
LOW Cal. Response ~ -0.06 HIGH Cal. Response = 147.80
LOW System Drift = -0.02 % HIGH System Drift * -0.36 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10,25A-E3
Calibrations:
[O2 ] Span Value =» 25
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas «= 9.86
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1334
LOW Cal. Response = 0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.81
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1547
LOW Cal. Response = 0.03 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.78
LOW System Drift = 0.08 % HIGH System Drift = -0.12 %
[CO ] Span Value = 1000
LOW calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas ~ 594.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1334
LOW Cal. Response - 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.34
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1547
LOW Cal. Response = 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.88
LOW System Drift = 0.00 % HIGH System Drift - 0.05 %
[THC ] Span Value - 100
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 44.80
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1359
LOW Cal. Response = -0.12 HIGH Cal. Response =* 44.60
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1603
LOW Cal. Response — -0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 42.55
LOW System Drift = 0.12 % HIGH System Drift = -2.05 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10-R4
Calibrations:
[SO2 ] Span Value = 225
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas *= 94.60
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1547
LOW Cal. Response =* -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 93.89
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1804
LOW Cal. Response = -0.01 HIGH Cal. Response = 0.00
LOW system Drift = 0.00 % HIGH System Drift = -41.73 %
[C02 ] Span value = 20
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 10.09
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1547
LOW Cal. Response = 0.07 HIGH Cal. Response — 9.66
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1804
LOW Cal. Response = 0.02 HIGH Cal. Response = 10.02
LOW system Drift = -0.28 % HIGH System Drift = 1.81 %
[NOx ] Span Value = 250
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 150.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1147
LOW Cal. Response = -0.06 HIGH Cal. Response = 147.80
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1804
LOW Cal. Response = 0.60 HIGH Cal. Response = 0.00
LOW System Drift = 0.26 % HIGH System Drift = -59.12 %
-------
Wheelabrator/LP/Dungannon
Reference Method Data
RTO Stack Outlet
RTOSO-M3A,6C,7E,10-R4
Calibrations:
[O2 ] Span Value = 25
LOW Calibration Gas = 0,00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 9.86
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1547
LOW Cal. Response =* 0.03 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.78
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1804
LOW Cal. Response = 0.13 HIGH Cal. Response = 9.78
LOW System Drift = 0.41 % HIGH System Drift - -0.00 %
[CO ] Span Value = 1000
LOW Calibration Gas = 0.00 HIGH Calibration Gas = 594.00
INITIAL CALIBRATION TIME —> 1547
LOW Cal. Response = 0.00 HIGH Cal. Response = 584.88
FINAL CALIBRATION TIME > 1804
LOW Cal. Response = -0.13 HIGH Cal. Response = 588.36
LOW System Drift = -0.01 % HIGH System Drift = 0.35 %
-------
APPENDIX K
GRAVIMETRIC LABORATORY DATA
-------
E T S , INC.
FIELD SAMPLE LOG
Contract No, 95-553
Job I.D.
Teat Method 5/202
Print Date 08/01/9S
Page 1
Time 15:20:47
Sample
NO.
I ooioo.m
j 00101
(00102
|00103
) 00104
} 00105
| 00106
100107
IOOIOB
| 00109
(00110
loom
| 00112
100113
| 00 11 4
(00115
I 00116
|00117
looiie
(00119
(00120
[00121
(00122
(00123
(00124
|00125
1 00126
| Container
No.
Fl
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
Fl
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
FB
Fl
F2
F3
F4
P5
F6
F7
P8
Fl
F2
F3
| Other Run | Sample
I.D. I.D. j Type
1
95-0045 RTO -202-R1 (Filter
RTQ -202-R1 |FH Acetone Rinse
RTO -2Q2-R1 ilmpinger contents
JRTO -202-R1 (imp. Contents extra
[RTO -202-R1 |H20 Impinger Rinse
95-0046
RTO -202-R1 |MECL2 Impinger Rinse
RTO -202-Rl (Silica Gel
RTO -202-Ri | TEDLAR BAG
RTO -202-R2 | Filter
RTO -202-R2 | FH Acetone Rinse
|RTO -202-R2 ( Impinger contents
RTO -202-R2 (imp. Contents extra
|RTO -202-R2 |H20 Impinger Rinoe
RTO -202-R2 |MECL2 Impinger Rinoe
RTO -202-R2 (Silica Gel
IRTO -202-R2 (TEDLAR BAG
95-0047
RTO -202-R3 (Filter
|RTO -202 -R3 |FH Acetone Rinse
IRTO -202-R3 Ilmpinger contents
„ „ J
RTO -202-R3 (imp. Contents extra
RTO -2Q2-R3 (H20 Impinger Rinse
RTO -202 -R3 JMECL2 Impinger Rinse
RTO -202-R3 (Silica Gel
IRTO -202-R3 JTEDLAR BAG
95-0048
BLK -202-RO (Filter
|BLK -202-RO |FH Acetone Rinse
|BLK -202-RO Ilmpinger contents
[ Volume , ml
no Rinses
Volume , ml
w/ Rinses
1
(Analyst) Date | Comments
1 i
1 I
TGW | 08/01/95|
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGM | 08/01/95)
TGW 1 08/01/951
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW |08/01/95|
TGW JOB/ 01/95 |
TGW 1 08/01/951
TGW | 08/01/95(
TGW | 08/01/95 J
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW 1 08/01/951
TGW (08/01/951
TGW ( 08/01/95 (
TGW (08/01/95)
TGW 1.08/01/95 1
TGW | 08/01/95 \
TGW (Oa/01/95|
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW J 08/01/95 |
TGW (08/0 1/95 |
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW ( 08/01/95 |
TGW 1 08/01/95)
TGW | 08/01/95 |
TGW \ 08/01/95 |
-------
E T S , INC.
FIELD SAMPLE
LOG
contract No, 95-553
Job I.D.
Test Method 5/202
Print Date 08/01/95
Page 2
i
| Sample
| No.
1
(00127
I 00128
Container
No.
F4
F5
|00129 | F6
| 00130 1 F7
(00131
Fa
Other |
I.D. |
I
IBLK
IBLK
IBLK
IBLK
IBLK
Run
I.D.
-202-RO
-2Q2-RQ
-202-RO
-202-RO
-202-RO
| Sample
I Type
1
[imp. Contents extra
[H20 Impinger Rinse
|MECL2 Impinger Rinse
| Silica Gel
ITEDLAR BAG
Volume , ml | Volume , ml
no Rinses [w/ Rinses
1
1
1
1
Analyst] Date j Comments |
! 1 !
1 1 !
TGW
TGW
TGW
TGW
TGW
|oa/oi/9sl 1
| 08/01/95 | |
| 08/01/951 [
| OB/01/95 | J
|08/01/95| |
-------
ETS, Inc.
GRAVIMETRIC LABORATORY DATA
Final Beaker Weights
Job Number: 95-553
Report Prepared on: 08/03/95
Page
Beaker #
Filter #
Sample i
Run 1.0.
Total Vol. ,ml
Aliquot Vol.
06/20/95-031
95-0045
95-553-00100
RTO -202-R1
06/20/95-032
95-553-00101
JRTO -202-R1
110.00000
110.00000
(06/20/95-040
95-553-00102
RTO -202-R1
400.00000
400.00000
, r_
J06/2Q/9S-039
95-553-00105
RTO -2Q2-R1
270.00000
(270.00000
I ,
1
06/20/95-033
95-0046
95-553-00108
JRTO -202-R2
1
1
Constant
Tare
Weight (g)
Beaker
Filter
67.54400
0.41790
67.46020
0.00000
67,26250
0.00000
__
~
66.83550
0.00000
67.22850
0.41780
- - J
Final Weight Data
Date Time Weight fg) Analyst
08/02/95 10;5i 67.96520 TGW
08/03/95 09:53 67.96510 TGW
08/02/95 10:58 67. 46450 TGW
08/03/95 09:54 67.46450 TGW
08/03/95 09:56 67.26600 TGW
08/03/95 16:02 67.26640 TGW
,___ .. „_.. , __ _
.. _. - .,
08/02/95 11:00 66.84280 TGW
08/03/95 09:56 66.84280 TGW
'
08/02/95 10:59 67.65050 TGW
08/03/95 09;54 67.65060 TGW
Constant
Final
Weight (g)
67.96510
67.46450
67.26640
66.842SO
67.65060
-------
ETS, Inc.
GRAVIMETRIC LABORATORY DATA
Final Beaker Weights
Job Number: 9S-SS3
Report Prepared on: 03/03/95
Page
. 2
1 1
| Beaker #
| Filter #
j Sample f
j Run I.D.
j Total Vol., ml
| Aliquot Vol.
JQ6/20/95-034
i
|95-553-00109
JRTO -202-R2
(100. 00000
|100. 00000
|06/20/95-042
1
195-553-00110
JRTO -202-R2
J410. 00000
J410. 00000
j
1 ~
| 06/20/95-041
1
|9S-553-00113
JRTO -202-R2
J255. 00000
(255.00000
(06/20/95-035
[95-0047
J95-553-00116
JRTO -202-R3
1
I _
(06/20/95-036
1
[95-553-00117
JRTO -202-R3
J1QO. 00000
J100. 00000
1
Constant
Tare
Weight {g)
Beaker
Filter
67.18480
0.00000
67.37660
0.00000
- _. _-
64.88330
0.00000
67.70930
0.41680
70.12320
0.00000
____
Final Weight Data
Date Time Weight (g) Analyst
08/02/95 10:59 67.18770 TGW
08/03/95 09:54 67.18760 TGW
'
08/03/95 09:56 67.38240 TGW
08/03/95 16:02 67.38280 TGW
,
08/02/95 11:00 64.88690 TGW
08/03/95 09:56 64.88680 TGW
.
08/02/95 10:5S 68.13140 TGW
08/03/95 09:55 68.13130 TGW
08/02/95 10:59 70.12670 TGW
08/03/95 09:55 70.12660 TGW
Constant
Final
Weight (g)
67.18760
67.38280
64.88680
68.13130
70.12660
-------
ETS, Inc.
GRAVIMETRIC LABORATORY DATA
Final Beaker Weights
Job Number: 95-553
Report Prepared on: 08/03/95
Page
j Beaker #
| Filter *
j Sample 8
j Run I.D.
j Total Vol., ml
j Aliquot Vol.
1
(06/20/95-044
1
(95-553-00118
JRTO -202-R3
j 420. 00000
(420.00000
(06/20/95-043
1
(95-553-00121
JRTO -202-R3
j 290.00000
(290.00000
(06/20/95-037
j 95-0048
(95-553-00124
IBLK -202-RO
I
1
j , ,
1 , —
(06/20/95-038
1
(95-553-00125
(BLK -202-RO
(120.00000
(120.00000
I_ __
_____
(06/20/95-046
1
(95-553-00126
(BLK -202-RO
(450.00000
J450. OQOOO
1
Constant
Tare
Weight (g)
Beaker
Filter
64.14680
0.00000
______ _„_
67.02160
0.00000
67.23540
0.41680
€4.29320
0.00000
70.94820
0.00000
Final Weight Data
Date Time Weight (g) Analyst
08/03/95 09:57 64.14920 TGW
08/03/95 16:03 64.14960 TGW
•
08/02/95 11:00 67.02670 TGW
08/03/95 09:57 67.02660 TGW
08/02/95 10:59 67.63890 TGW
08/03/95 09:56 67.63930 TGW
08/02/95 10:59 64,29350 TQW
08/03/95 09:56 64.29320 TGH
Oi/03/95 09:57 70.950iQ TGW
08/03/S5 16:03 70.95130 TGW
Constant
Final
Weight (g)
€4.14960
67.02660
67.63930
64.29320
70.95130
-------
Job Number: 95-553
Report Prepared on: 08/03/95
ETS, Inc.
GRAVIMETRIC LABORATORY DATA
Final Beaker Heights
Page
[ 1
Beaker #
Filter #
Sample #
Run I.D.
Total Vol., ml
Aliquot Vol.
06/20/95-045
95-553-00129
BLK -202-RO
275.00000
275.00000
Constant
Tare
Weight (g)
Beaker
Filter
67.33300
0.00000
Final Weight Data
Date Time Weight (g) Analyst
.
08/02/95 11:00 . 67.33210 TGW
08/03/95 09:57 67.33260 TGW
'
Constant
Final
Weight (g)
.•
67.33260
-------
APPENDIX L
FORMALDEHYDE LABORATORY DATA
-------
Table 1
Analytical Results
for
ETS, INC.
Clayton Project No. 29340.00
Client Referenced: 9S-553
Clayton
CONSULTANTS
Page 2 of
Sample Identification; RTO-0011-R3 (95-5S3-00204)
Lab Number:
Sample Type:
Analyst:
Analyte
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Benzaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Trmaldehyde
..exanal
I sobutyr aldehyde
Pentanal
Propanal
m-Tolualdehyde
o-Tolualdehyde
p-Tolualdehyde
003a
Imp'inger / Bubbler
JW
Analytical Results
(rng) (mg/ro3)
0.31
0.03
0.04
0.03
1.1
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
07/29/95
08/01/35
Air Volume (L) :
/"
— - -- - LUU
(ppm) (mg)
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
. -- o.oi
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
fcfe**- K«"irl
Pi0£nou
Reference
EPA OO11
E?A OO11
EPA O011
EPA 0011
EPA OO11
EPA O011
EPA OO11
EPA O011
E?A O011
EPA OO11
EPA OO11
EPA 0011
r%a f' £1
uace
Analyzed
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/iS
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
-------
Table 1 (continued)
Analytical Results
for
ETS, INC.
Clayton Project No. 29340.00
Client Reference*: 95-553
Clayton
ESVIRONMtNTAl
CONSULTANTS
Page
3 of
Sample Identification: RTO-0011-BLANK (95-553-00206)
Lab Number: 004a
Sample Type: Impinger / Bubbler
Analyst: JW
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Air Volume (L)
08/01/95
Analyte
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Benzaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Hexanal
Isobutyraldehyde
Pentanal
Propanal
m-Tolualdehyde
o-Tolualdehyde
p-Tolualdehyde
Analytical Results
(mg) (mg/m3) (ppm)
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
7 ^n
LiUU
(mg)
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Reference
EPA 0011
EPA OO11
EPA 0011
EPA OO11
EPA OO11
EPA 0011
EPA OO11
EPA OO11
EPA 0011
EPA 0011
EPA 0011
EPA 0011
Date
Analyzed
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/"
08/04/
08/04/S5
08/04/95
08/04/S5
08/04/95
08/04/95
08/04/95
General Notes
<: Less than the indicated limit of detection (LOD)
--: Information not available or not applicable.
Samples RTO-OOil-Hl (95-553-00200) ar.d RTO-OQ11-R2 (95-553-00202) were r.ot analyzed
due to a laboratory error.
-------
APPENDIX M
MDI LABORATORY DATA
-------
ETS Analytical Services
Methylene bis(4,4'phenyl isocyanate) Analysis
Project #0895005
August 28, 1995
Summary and Interpretation Report
Prepared by:
Triangle Laboratories of Columbus
-------
ETS Analytical Services
Methylene bis(4,4'phenyl isocyanate) analysis
Project #0895005
Narratiye
Seven impinger samples were received on 2 August 1995 for methylene bjs-(4,4'-
phenyl isocyanate)[MDrj analyses. The samples were as follows:
LabJIL: Client ID.:
0895005-1 00300/RTO-MDI-R1
0895005-2 00301/RTQ-MDI-R1
0895005-3 00307/RTO-MDI-R2
08950054 003Q8/RTO-MDI-R2
0895005-5 00314/RTO-MDI-R3
0895005-6 00315/RTO-MDI-R3
0895005-7 00319/BLANK
Samples were pooled as follows: 00300 + 00301, 00307 -I- 00308, and 0314+00315.
There were a total of four analyses.
Sample Resujts
There was no detectable MDI in samples Rl, R2 and the BLANK. There appeared to
be a very low level of MDI in sample R3. The residue in this sample was a total 0.04
jig. This was calculated from a concentration in the extract which was less than the
lowest calibrator and is therefore an estimate.
Quality Control
The analyte calibration curve was linear with an r2 value exceeding 0.99. The
continuing calibration check deviated from the initial calibration by 9,2%. A Lab
Spike (LS) and Lab Spike Duplicate (LSD) were performed with 10 jig spiked into 30
mL aliquots of the toluene impinger solution. The recoveries were 92.7% and 96.2%
for the LS and LSD respectively.
There was no detectable MDI in the method blank. The reported value was the
minimum detection limit.
The minimum detection limit was calculated as 5 times the baseline noise. The
chromatograrn for this analysis was the lowest calibrator (0.2 jig/mL). The calculated
minimum detection limit was 0.01 total *.
-------
Details of
The total volume of the toluene/piperazine impinger solution for each analysis was
measured, then a 200-mL aliquot was removed and concentrated to 1.0 mL following a
solvent exchange into acetonitrile. This 1 .0-mL aliquot was transferred to an HPLC
autosampler vial and capped for analysis.
The Method Blanks and Lab Spikes were prepared by with 30-mL of the
toluene/piperazine solution which was exactly the same as that used for the impinger
traps. The solutions were concentrated and solvent exchanged as were the samples.
The calculations used for the recoveries etc. were done based on volumes similar to
that of the samples for comparison.
The HPLC analysis was done by injection of 20 pL, of sample on a 4.6 mm x 25 cm
Rainin ODS Widepore column. The solvents for the HPLC elution were:
Solvent A: 30% acetonitrile in 0.1 M ammonium acetate at pH 5.0
Solvent B: acetonitrile
The HPLC program was as follows:
at time 0: 100% Solvent A
at lime 20 minutes: 100% Solvent B
at time 22 minutes: 100% Solvent A, followed by a 4 minute equilibration time.
The piperazine derivative of MDI was detected by optical absorbance of a 248 nm
incident beam, and all chromatographic data was acquired electronically by a local
network of a personal computer configured with an HP 35900D A/D interface board
and HP-G125QC ChemStation software.
Preparatiqri of Piperazine-MDI Standard
A 223 mg aliquot of l-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazuie was dissolved in 225 mL of
toluene and then 125.5 mg of 4,4'-methylene bis (phenyl isocyanate) was added to the
solution. The reaction occurred quickly. A 50-mL aliquot of acetonitrile was added
and the solution was heated until all precipitate was dissolved. The solution was placed
in a refrigerator over night and the crystals separated from the solution by filtration
through a Whatman #4 filter paper.
The filtrate was concentrated with heat to approximately 100 mL and then cooled over
night again to optimize recovery of the derivative.
A 1.0 mg/mL solution in acetonitrile was made and mass corrected by 2.5365 (394.2
jig/mL). The standard curve was prepared on a concentration from 0.2 to 50 jig/mL
based on the mass corrected concentrations.
-------
Data Analysts
The peak area data were computed into molar corrected concentrations of the analytes
and reported as jig/mL on the integratioo printout. This value is computed from a
linear function of the initial calibration peak area and ^g/mL data. The sample data
was entered into an Excel spreadsheet and mathematically converted to total fig as
follows:
(A x B) / C - total pg
Where: A = Reported ^ig/mL of analyte
B = Sample volume in mL
C = Aliquot volume concentrated to 1 mL (200 mL)
Report prepared by:
Randall L, Detra, Ph, D.
Senior Chemist, Triangle Labs-Agrochemical Products Division
Data release by:
Ronald K. Mhchulh, Ph. D.
President, Triangle Labs-Agrochemical Products Division
0*0003
-------
DATA SUMMARY OF MDI ANALYSIS FROM 1MPINGER CATCHES
Project #0895005.
Lab ID
Client ID.
Total ug Q
0895005-1+2 00300+00301 /RTO-MDI-R1
0895005-3+4 00307+00308/RTOMDI-R2
0895005-5+6 0031 4+0031 5/RTO-MDI-R3
0895005-7 00319/BLANK
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.01
u
u
J
u
U: Analyte was not detected, the calculated minimum detection limit is reported.
J: The detected analyte was present at a concentration less than the lowest calibrator.
0^0005
-------
DATA REDUCTION OF MDI ANALYSIS FROM IMPINGER CATCHES
Project #0895005. •••-.••
Lab ID Client ID.
0895005-1+2 00300+00301/RTO-MDI-R1
0895005-3+4 00307+00308/RTO-MDI-R2
0895005-5+6 00314+0031 5/RTO-MDI-R3
0895005-7 00319/BLANK
ug/mL
0.0018
0.0018
0.0069
0.0018
Concent
Vol.
1
1
. 1
•" 1
Aliquot
Vol.
-.200
200
200
200
Total
Vol. Total ug Q
1198
1250
1269
949 :
0.01 U
0.01 U
0.04 J
0.01 U
U: Analyte was not detected, the calculated minimum detection limit Is reported.
J: The detected analyte was present at a concentration less than the lowest calibrator.
-------
DATA REDUCTION OF MDI ANALYSIS QUALITY CHECKS
Project #0895005.
Lab ID
Client ID.
Value Q Parameter
0895005-MB
0895005-LS
0895005-LSD
CONCAL
Method Blank
Lab Spike
Lab Spike Duplicate
Contin. Calib. Check
.0.01 U Total ug
92.7% Recovery
96.2% Recovery
i.2% Deviation
U: Analyte was not detected, the calculated minimum detection limit is reported.
•Volume of lab method blank nominally set at 1200 mL fo comparison.
Or'f 008
-------
DATA REDUCTION OF MDI ANALYSIS QUALITY CHECKS
Project #0895005.
Concent. Aliquot
Lab ID Client ID. ug/mL Vol. Vol.
0895005-MB
0895005-LS
0895005-LSD
CONCAL
Method Blank*
Lab Spike
Lab Spike Duplicate
Contin. Calib. Check
0.0018
9.2720
9.6190
10.9200
1
1
1
1
200
200
200
200
Total '
Vol. Total uqQ
1200
1200
1200
. 949
0.01 U
55.63
57.71
61.82
Value
0.01
92.7%
96.2%
9.2%
Parameter
Total ug
Recovery
Recovery
Deviation
U: Analyte was not detected, the calculated minimum detection limit is reported.
•Volume of lab method blank nominally set at 1200 mL fo comparison.
•'09
-------
(Ji
05
03
w
0
(0
K-
K
0
000
ft 0 $
£ A A
0
ID
f
0 0
(1 9
iK ,K
. . . T . . . . T . .
0 »
(D 0
3 =3 9* «EK SS* SS SSE a
External Standard Report
•ta Pile Name
cator
idtrument
iinple Name
i Time Bar Code
julred on
jport Created on
•;t Recallb on
tlpller
C t \HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9507 . D
HLD
LC 1 FLUO .
0895005-1,2
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
1
12i55 PM
08s53 PM
08i40 PM
La. 1 In C i \HPCHBM\2\DATAM5AU9507.D
: Time Area Type Width Ref* ng/ul
i I—-I I— r—|"
16.865 50004 MM 0.389 1
tr Modified
Page Number i
Vial Number t
Injection Number »
Sequence Line t
Instrument Methodi
Analysis Method t
Sample Amount i
ISTD Amount ' »
1
7
1
1
MDI01.HTH
MDI01.NTH
Name
Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
a ssat JRS ss 53 a IB xx ra KZ is r
-------
0
0
0
0
0)
0
0
CO
0
0
0
co
0
0
N
.0
0
0
0
0
NJ
0
c
c
K
t-
\-
(1
c
External Standard Report
Data Pile Name : C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9515.D
Operator i
Instrument :
Sample Name «
Run Time Bar Code:
Acquired on {
Report Created on:
Last Recalib on i
Multiplier t
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
0895005-162 100X
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
04.44 PM
09:06 PM
08:40 PM
Sig. 1 in C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9515.D
Ret Time Area Type Width Ref#
ng/ul
Page Number :
Vial Number i
Injection Number :
Sequence Line j
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method :
Sample Amount :
ISTD Amount '
Name
1
15
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
1
16.762 * not found *
Methylene bis phen isocyanate
Not all calibrated peaks were found
User Modified
:•- • 12
-------
0
(S
0
0)
0
(0
1
CD
b
(I
1
0
(1
ft)
ED
(D
1
M
0
49.996
External Standard Report
=» File Name
ator
^rument
pie Name
Time Bar Code
Ired on
art Created on
*• Recallb on
Ipller
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9508.D
ELD
LC 1 PLUG
3,4
01i24 PM
08i55 PM
08i40 PM
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
1
,. 1 In C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9508.D
Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
I
Page Number i' 1
Vial Number -. 8
Injection Number « 1
Sequence Line t 1
Instrument Method: MDI01.MTH
Analysis Method i MDI01.MTH
Sample Amount « 0
ISTD Amount i
Name
___•______
Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
6.934 * not found
all calibrated peaks were found
•r Modified
••13
-------
M
>J
0
0
0
p
>}
en
0
0
M
03
0
0
0
M
0
en.
0
0
M
(0
0
0
0
1
N
0
»13.248
»13.699
17.550
c
(f
(I
K
I-
c
c
t-
(1
c
External Standard Report
:a File Name :
trator :
itrument i
tple Name :
i Time Bar Code:
luired on : 15 Aug 95
sort Created on: 21 Aug 95
;t Recallb on i 21 Aug 95
.tipller : l
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9516.D
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
089500S-3&4 100X
05:12 PM
09:07 PM
08:40 PM
j. 1 In Ci\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9516.D
: Time Area Type Width Ref# ng/ul
Page Number :
Vial Number
Injection Number t
Sequence Line :
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method :
Sample Amount «
ISTD Amount :
Name
1
16
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
.6.762 • not found •
Methylene bis phen isocyanate
all calibrated peaks were found
;r Modified
-------
CO
o
0
o
M
0
N
0
o
0
o
W
H
o
0
o
W
0
0
0
' i 1 .'...« « » _L
w
0
0
0
0
« ' ' •
N
£
0
0
0
bis phen isoejanale 15.678
18.597
N
Oi
0
0
0
4WS4
External Standard Report
*-a File Name s
rator 8
iitrument :
mple Name «
Time Bar Code:
juired on :
port Created on-.
"t Recalib on s
tiplier :
Ci\HPCHSM\2\DATA\15AU9509.D
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
0895005-5,6
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
01*52 PM
09s14 PM
08i40 PM
Page Number »
Vial Number :
Injection Number s
Sequence Line t
Instrument Methods
Analysis Method i
Sample Amount i
ISTD Amount «
1
9
1
1
MD101.HTH
MDI01.MTH
0
a. 1 in Ci\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9509.D
Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
I
Name
16.678
T Modified
588 MM 0.151
0.00691 Methylene bis phen isocyanate
-------
o
o
0)
0
0
M
o
•M
•^
ED
0
0
t i f « I
H
03
0
0
0
i
t-i
0
w
0
0
1 ..i. , .
•15.216
0
0
0
lene bis phen isocyanate 16.712
',903
External Standard Report
=ss cat cat nx mm
Data Pile Name
Operator
Instrument •.
Sample Name :
Run Time Bar Code;
Acquired on ;
Report Created on
Last Recallb on :
Multiplier
i C;\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9517.D
: RLD
s LC 1 FLUO
: 089S005-5&6
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
05i41 PM
09:09 PM
08i40 PM
3ig. 1 in C8\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9517.D
Ret Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
Page Number s
Vial Number t
Injection Number s
Sequence Line $
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method :
Sample Amount t
ISTD Amount
Name
1
17
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
i
16.712
Jser Modified
240 MM 0.284
0.00282 Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
-------
u
0
(D
(B
.0
(D
N
0
External Standard Report
-ii File Name »
ator :
icrument t
-pie Name «
Time Bar Code:
, .ilred on i 15 Aug 95
port Created on: 21 Aug 95
': Recalib on i
:lplier »
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9510.D
RLD
LC 1 PLUG
0895005-7
21 Aug 95
1
02i21 PM
08:59 PM
08:40 PM
I. 1 in C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9510.D
Time Area Type Width Ref* ng/ul
I— — I I I—"I
16.934 * not found * 1
Page Number :
Vial Number :
Injection Number :
Sequence Line :
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
1
10
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
Name
i____________—___——_——————————-
Methylene bis phen isocyanate
t all calibrated peaks were found
er Modified
- ' '17
-------
External Standard Report
a sat EX ess s» «a *
ta Pile Name •. Ci \HPCHSM\2\DATA\15AU9518.D
srator i
itrument :
tiple Name i
i Time Bar Code:
3uired on ?
?ort Created ons
st Recalib on i
Itiplier *
RLD
LC 1 PLUO
0895005-7 100x
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
1
06s09 PM
09s12 PM
08:40 PM
j. 1 in Ci \HPCHEM\2\DATAM5AU9518.D
t Time Area Type Width Ref # ng/ul
Page Number s
Vial Number :
Injection Number
Sequence Line
Instrument Method
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
Name
1
18
1
1
MDIS1.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
i
16.762 * not found *
Methylene bis phen isocyanate
t all calibrated peaks were found
er Modified
" '18
-------
Aug 95 01,33 PM page 1
;hod t C«\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\MDI01.MTH
" Calibration Table
* RT Lvl ng/ul Arot/Hght Ref Istd It Name
* 16.934 1 . 50,2 5.S74e-004 1 Methylene bis phen 1..
2 20.08 5.439e-004
3 10.04 4.55376-004
4 1.004 4.5368e-004
5 0.2008 3.892e-004
:0
-------
N
0
(D
0
0
(D
1
0
w
0
0
(D
1
Mhjlene bis phen isocyanale 16.947
I:
01
(I
External Standard Report
Data File Name
Operator
Instrument :
Sample Name i
Run Time Bar Codes
Acquired on i
Report Created oni
Last Recallb on i
Multiplier i
: C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9504.D
t RLD
: LC 1 FLUO
: CAL. 10.04 ug/mL
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
11:29 AM
08:58 PM
08:40 PM
31g. 1 In C.\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9504.D
Set Time . Area Type Width Refft ng/ul
Page Number
Vial Number
Injection Number
Sequence Line
Instrument Method
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
Name
1
4
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
I
16.947 264531 MM
'Jser Modified
0.200
10.920 Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
'.2
-------
CD
0
CD
-vl
oH
o
0
oH
o
0
0
(0
0)
M
0
H
0 0
fj — 1 1 -J 1 1 1 1 1 —
0
0
1— . i- ,
External Standard Report
SSSSSSSlSSiSSS*
a Pile Name i
ator i
crument ;
pie Name i
Time Bar Code:
tired on i
ort Created on:
": Recalib on i
:lplier ,
C:\HPCHEM\2SDATA\15AU9506.D
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
CAL. 0.2008ug/mL
15 Aug 95
23 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
1
12i26 PM
08s34 AM
08*40 PM
. 1 in Cs\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9506.D
Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
Page Number
Vial Number »
Injection Number i
Sequence Line
Instrument Method
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
Name
1
6
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
0
i __.._.•___.._____________...._____.
0.0717 Methyiene bis phen Isocyanate
6.934
• Modified
6105 MM 0.196 1
23
-------
External Standard Report
a File Name : C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9506.D
rator :
trument i
pie Name :
Time Bar Codes
•ulred on •,
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
CAL. 0.2008ug/mL
15 Aug 95
ort Created on: 22 Aug 95
t Recallb on
tlpller
21 Aug 95
1
12:26 PM
08:48 AM
08:40 PM
. 1 In C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9506.D
Time Area . Type Width Ref* ng/ul
Page Number
Vial Number
Injection Number
Sequence Line
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
Name
r 1
: 6
i 1
: 1
: MDI01
: MDI01
: 0
.MTH
.MTH
i
I
I
I
6.934
r Modified
6105 MM 0.196 1
0.0717 Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
-------
K
0
0
0
.»,!...
H
0)
0
0
0
L I t J i
0
0
0
1 1 1 .
W
0
0
0
0
1 I I t 1
w
M
0
0
0
, 1
0 \^>10.215
sea B3 sais-SBi ea aaca a= SB 2
External Standard Report
:a Pile Name
.rator
;trument
nple Name
i Time Bar Code
juired on
sort Created on
-,t Recallb on
tiplier
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15ftU9501.D
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
Ins. Blank
15 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
21 Aug 95
1
10t04 AM
08t51 PM
<38t40 PM
3. 1 in Ct\HPCHEMN2\DATA\15AU9501.D
Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
_____ i _____„_„_ i ____] ____«,! i ______
16.934 * not found * 1
Page Number
Vial Number
Injection Number
Sequence Line
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
Name
i ______
i .
Methylene bis phen isocyanate
t 1
I 1
: 1
! 1
: MDI01
: MDI01
i 0
.MTH
.MTH
t all calibrated peaks were found
26
-------
External Standard Report
Data File Name •»
Operator i
Instrument s
Sample Name t
Run Time Bar Code •.
Acquired on i 15 Aug 95
Report Created ons 21 Aug 95
Last Recallb on « 21 Aug 95
Multiplier j 1
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9511.D
KLD
LC 1 FLUO
0895005-MB
02s 49 PM
09s01 PM
08:40 PM
Slg. 1 In C»\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9511.D
Ret Time Area Type Width Reft
i i „_____.______ r i i ____.
16.934 * not found • 1
ng/ul
Page Number : 1
Vial Number : 11
Injection Number s I
Sequence Line i 1
Instrument Method: MDI01.MTH
Analysis Method t MDI01.MTH
Sample Amount t 0
ISTD Amount :
Name
I _,«,*»____«,
* ~~
Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
Not all calibrated peaks were found
User Modified
27
-------
N
0
0
ID
CO
b
ID
1
0
(D
f
1
?
b
(D
11.054)
13.215
! 3.663
^555
15.001
R.525
Lfi.247
lfi-059
ra.gos
-Methylene bis phen isocyanate 16.762
External Standard Report
a File Name
ator
.rument
Die Name
Time Bar Code
ired on
art Created on
• Recalib on
iplier
C:NHPCHEMN2\DATA\15AU9512.D
RLD
LC 1 FLUO
0895005-LS
15 Aug 95 03.18 PM
21 Aug 95 09»02 PM
21 Aug 95 08t40 PM
1
. 1 in C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9512.D
Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
Page Number :
Vial Number :
Injection Number :
Sequence Line :
Instrument Method:
Analysis Method i
Sample Amount :
ISTD Amount :
Name
1
12
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH
5.762
226511 W T 0.212 1
9.272 Methylene bis phen isocyanate
29
-------
ethjlene bis phen isocyanate 16.743
External Standard Report
ta File Name
arator
strument
nple Name
n Time Bar Code
gulred on
port Created on
st Recalib on
Itlpller
C:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9513.D
RLD
LC 1 PLUO
0895005-LSD
15 Aug 95 03i46 PM
21 ftug 95 09:03 PM
21 Aug 95 08i40 PM
1
Page Number i
Vial Number i
Injection Number »
Sequence Line
Instrument Methodf
Analysis Method
Sample Amount
ISTD Amount
1
13
1
1
MDI01.MTH
MDI01.MTH'
0
Name
g. 1 In Cs\HPCHEM\2\DATA\15AU9513.D
t Time Area Type Width Reft ng/ul
______ I I j _____ I _____ I _!,_ I ___«-.__________.
16.743 234503 BB T 0.211 1 9.619 Methylene bis phen Isocyanate
30
-------
'! Anoly.iciil Joivlcoi i A (.*>fi/i»i a/lis. lie.
JETS, INC.
CHAIN OP CUSTODY URCOftO
NUMDCIl
0
RUN NUMBER/OTHER ID
HIM Kliiiiulnui Riniii N.W.
, Itwmokc.VA MOIMJIIV
I'lHitic I/II.U ?fi,MH«ll / I'AX (70.1) 5f».l -IH6fi
L
00307
Mrliiii|i)til>eil Ity;
llrlimiulilicil liyt ISlf
Iry: f.$/pil liy;
llecetveil Iiy: fS'f"»i<"«/
llfllllll|illlllrll liy :
liy*. fSif
Dull! / Him
Ome / lime
. Onie/lline
liyt f.t
Urcrlvrit hy: f5>>uii»rl
-------
ORDERED BY:
SUBJECT TO STATS TAX:
ETS REQUISITION
1401 MUNICIPAL RD.
RQANOKE.VA 24012
(703) 265-0004
REQUISITION MUST BE TURNED IN TO ACCOUNTING WITHIN 5 DAYS
P.O. NO.
/-»-o i
ORDERED __^-
FROM )viW»,J<-. Lob<
U
TERMS
. F.O.B.
DEUY
TX,^ V-r»«J^^ SHIP VIA
DATE
CONFIRMEOTO:
FTEM
1
,
"^
QUANTITY
V
DESCRIPTION
K?QT w^u-.
3 -
,
PR1C=
a^r
—
P£H
.
AMOUNT
-f^D
^-
WANTED FOR:
CHARGE TO:
DATEOFREQ,
REMARKS:
REQT3BY:
DATE WANTED: _
APPROVED BY:
FOLLOW UP:
-------
Project #:
Date Rec'd:
Carrier:
Analysis:
Condition --
Client:
.Tnr
,^ ferrv Tracking #:
Type(s) of Matrix
Temperature
Type of Container
Custody seals?
Chain of Custody?
Other.
Client ID:
Lab ID:
Date
Sampled
Matrix
Comment
OO.W
7/3,
• z
60307
-3
003'^
-5
C03I5
OC3
Log in Fcxm Rev 02A.OGINFRM.XIS
Log in Iniliaf
b -..VktY^i
-------
ETS, INC.
Proudly serving iitJusiry ;tnd govcrnniciH >iiwc 1975. Providing: Tiuic Emission Measurement & Control
A subsidiary of ETS International, Inc.
July 31, 1SS5
Sample Custody
Triangle Labs of RTF, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive
Durham, NC 22713
(919) 544-5491
RE: 4 runs - MDI Samples (front and back half)
ETS, Inc. Contract % 95-553 (La Pacific)
ETS, Inc. Purchase Order|5637
Dear Sample Custody,
This letter accompanies four (4) MDI samples for analysis. Please
note that runs 1,2 and 3 consist of a front and a back half - the
blank is combined. Please refer to Purchase order w 5637 in all
correspondence. A 21 calendar day turnaround is requested. Feel
free to contact Sample Manager Terry Williamson, project manager
Andy Hetz or myself if you have any questions.
Broadwell
Sample Technician
UTS IXC - 1401 Municipal R.uuJ, NW - Kuannkc. Vjrvini.i NtH 2-iJMt'J . IVk-j.luiiK-: 7.»l.»l
"/'••Ititlii-ti l-jl^inn-iiu\; *.",»(>•••:..•.' " •< /'.I A" l\n\'iit»:ini it:,'.', .'..,-.«,/ »>••//.•<" i t ft f- I*
(*) Itiiiiv-tl "« i.v;..-..%l :•:- .-. •
-------
EXTRACTION FORM TRIANGLE LABS-COLUMBUS
reject: QSQO.^Analysis:
late
?-i3-%
„
*
Samg
~H^L
*3i5rH
~S*^>
"Hft
~LS
-LS*
Toll.
Sam.
™
uq$
13SO
\ *M iff\
Q 4|Q
^ .
r^o
30
Totl.
Sam.
v '
-5 DO
,360
Joo
£LQC>
2bQ
30
3o
- •
..
1
-
Extr.
Vol.
Aliq.
^
^^
In
\.n
Uo
KO
v,0
UD
MeJhod Solvent Vol. xRep
Soxhlel Hex
Sep fun. MeOH
Sonic. CHCI3
Cont. Extr, CH2C12
Vial ACN
SPE • EtAc.
Distill. IPA
Other Water
Other
Mix
Ratio:
Spike Information
Surrogate Vol Ami/Cone WHn Init
SL-
SL-
SL-
Int. Std.
SL-
SL-
SL-
• SL-
LS/MS
SL-/,-^ 50^
SL-
SL-
SL-
SL-
Comrnents:
"- '-38
-------
APPENDIX N
FACILITY OPERATING DATA
-------
FEB-1H5WD i:52P« fCASI
FAX HO. 708 7066945
I 2
7-27-jy
BTUE (On or OS)
Temp-Comb.Cbamber
Temp - Wet
Temp - Exhaust
Teop - Cham. #1 lower bed
Terap - Cham. #2 lower bed
Temp - Cham #3 Jowerbed
Temp - Cham #4 kwerbed
Temp - Cham #5 lower bed
Temp - Cham *5 lower bed
Temp - Cham #7 lower bed
Temp - Cham #8 lower bed
RTOAP
Pressure - Inlet Duct
Te»p-Burner #1
Temp - Burner #2
Tcaip-Burner i3
Output - Burner #1 ConL %
Output - Burner #2 Cent. %
Output - Burner §3 Cont. %
Setpomt - Burner 81 Cont. "F
Setpoiflt - Burner #2 Cont. *F
Sctpotnt - Burner #3 Cont. °F
Motor Anq» - Fan #1
Motor Amps - Fan #2
motor Speed - fw #1
Motor Speed - Pan #2
CO out from CEM
Air flow from CEM
RTO DATA SHEET
UNIT:
fit
vJ
/SVl
. M^L JIL- !&.. MIL.
%2tf 221 £22- ,J3V. 2JC
,5/9 3g^ 3/y .^//; ^Mi. 3L7
ML. *f^ 2$(* 2
/¥#i>
A^
3-'
-------
FEB-1H5IEO i;52 PM MAS I
DATE*;
FAI NO. ?08 7066945
- P. 2
RTO DATA SHEET
UNIT:
Bins
*K)
BUTE (On or Ofi)
Tcmp-Comb.Caamber
Temp - Ink!
Temp - Exhaust
Temp - Cham. #1 lower bed
Temp - Cham, #2 lower bed
Temp - Cham #3 lower bed
Temp - Cham 04 lower bed
Temp - Cham #5 lower bed
Temp - Cham 36" lower bed
Temp - Cham #7 lower bed
Temp - Cham #8 lower bed
RTO A P
Pressure - Inlet Duct
Temp-Burner #1
Temp - Burner #2
Temp - Burner #3
Output - Burner #1 CotU. %
Outpul - Burner #2 Coat. %
Output - Burner S3 Coot, %
Setpoint - Burner 81 Cort. *F
Sctpoint - Burner #2 Coat. °F
Setpoint -Burner S3 Cent. °F
Motor Amps - fan f I
Motor Amps - Fan f2
motor Speed-Fan* I
Motor Speed - Fan #2
CO out from CEM
Air flow from CEM
«££.
f j/ Zjyt.
322
32^
rz
3/g
JEfiL
£f z_ 3.91
& 7-
ML
£_ 3?1
Z.
&
JJ1
_47j.
Jy. z ju. (, gf.f
. 5" yc. 1
*jf ^
c.r.3
I?**-3
/^>
^u> J
/y/T
MA,
JUL.
-------
SENT BYILOUISIANA-PACIFIC ! 3-25-84 J 1U7PH I ENGINEERING OEPT.'
17034672815:0 2
DRYER DATA SHEET
DATE 7-27 -?s"
BY
PLANT:
REVOLUTIONS par MINUTJT
y.
FUEL CALIBBATIQN:
fh*OTC ANY CHANCES
-7
TIME
OUTTJET
SET
POWT
FH-iJ
RATE
INLET
TEJJP
DRYBI
OUTLET
TEMP
FUEL
counr
WET
BIN
SUJ*. CORE
DRY BIN
LEVB.
EVERY HOUR
FLAKE UOIfflURE
IN
OUT
33
{.0
12.0$
&
//7
/T3
Vf
33
/.•/
/T3
$5-
ss
///f
ye//
yr
IZ'.lS
J73
/?*.
XL
/:af)
tfa
/:/$
?5
/?*
#//
it 6
1310
3/77
zs
JO
*.'//
?$
ni
?f
Sf*
A//
25
3'/S
2$
3?
Jtf*.
3.V-T
/
-------
SENT iYlLOUISIANA-PAGIFIC J 3-Z5-M.; 1U7PK '• ENGINEERING DEPT.'
;S 2
DRYER DATA SHEET
DAT!
BY
5.
PUNT:
REVOLUTIONS paf MINUTE:
{NOTE ANY CHAN'OESIHSETPCWTB)
FUEL CALIBRATION:
TIME
OUTLET
SET
POWT
FEED
RATE
ORYER
INL£T
TEMP
OUTLET
TEMP
RJBL
O3UNT
WET
BIN
Leva.
BUR. CODE
DRY BIN
L^VS.
EVERY HOUR
FLAKE UOtSTURE
W
OUT
.'£> 0
//?£.
*/:)<>
//ro
5 :»u
//Si
V7J1
*/*
//r/
'/A
S'o
A//
£0
-------
SCRUBBER DATA SHEET - A
TIME
«7.'9»
9:&)
'0-30
\l\3o
\&'.v>
/:3o
•J:I>Q
3:3 &'
¥•'3°
JJVJO
30
r
DRYER ID
FAN
"OFWATCR
Wo
Vo
yo
v^
^J9
V6?
VO '
c/o
//o
So
SCRUBBER PUMP PRESSURE
UPPER
NOZZLE
2*
^3/o
20
to
20
2rt
1£L
-£L>
7J&
7-u
LOWER
NOZZLE
/S?
/#
f8
/«
/ft
'§
fR
f&
/4
f1^
*
SCRUBBER
pH /*
t.z.
£"<£.
*
VDF FEEDING
OLTT MATERIAL
YES/NO
' uf5
ci*».-?
ue^
i
Lj^5 '•
u^-f
6e5
ate
V15
W<^
,\ -
K-S FILTER^
WEIGHTS
SIGNATURE
-------
.V
SCRUBBER DATA SHEET - 0
DATE 7-27-9S-
TIME
8: to
9:39
0'-3f>
/:.?£>
2:.&>
U36
J:3d
3 -30
y.'Ja
S-30
w
\7
-------
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
DUNGANNON, VIRGINIA
SHI FT OPERATING REPORT
SUPERVISOR
SHIFT
CREW
DATE
PRESS OPE RATION
j FROM j TO
7 fa* ; Ipw
I
I
1
i
LINE SPEED
J77r
THICKNESS
^
1 .
TOTAL
PRESS LOADS
/7/
/?/
3/S'FOOTAGE
F^. /^:^
'
7/3
DOUVTIME
(MINUTES)
?
AVG. WET
MOISTURE
3/
AVG. DRY
MOISTURE
^•3
BARK MOISTURE % (AVG.) J
-------
f,
-------
9AH
-------
FEB-1H5IED 1:52 PM WCAS1
DATE*J >2.
-------
FEB-M-95KD 1:52 PM WCAS1
FAI HO. 708 7066945
P. 2
DATEkj 7cn-
RTO DATA SHEET
UNIT:
Time
l- * iV-
212
l£Z
BTUE (On or OS)
Tcrnp-C o mb .Chamber
Temp-Inkl
Temp -Exhaust
Temp - Cham. #1 lower bed
Temp - Cham. #2 lower bed
Temp - Cham #3 lower bed
Temp - Cham. #4 lower bed
Temp - Cham #5 lower bed
Temp - Cham *S lower bed
Temp - Cham #7 lowtr bed
Temp - Cham #8 lower bed
RTO A P
Pressure - Inlet Duct
Temp- Burner # I
Temp - Burner #2
Temp - Burner &)
Output - Burner #1 Cont. %
Output - Burner #2 Coat. %
Output - Burner £3 Cont % G~lS\ (O-O
Setpoint - Burner ff 1 Cort. *F »' j>gf
Setpoint - Burner #2 Cont. °F
Sctpoint - Burner #3 Cont CF
Motor Amps - Fan #1
Motor Amps - Fan #2
motor Speed - Fan #1
Motor Speed - Fan #2
CO out from CEM
Air flow from CEM V/t
jb>(
- 0&.
IS*
oCP
teff
3N. 3i"L 3/7 !>)Z
Li2 2l£
LLL
117,
35-0
t
,?f.r
^'.f
.O
C|.Z
Jd. '
SJL Ik
-------
HHH5WD I--52PM KCASI FAI M§ 7Q8 m^ p j'
RTO DATA SHEET
DAT&J <*? "^•y^'?3 UNIT: Oun*,',*™^
Jims
BTUE(OnorOS) off-or^F gl'«- '/'4^ P'n?r oA-
Tcmp-Comb.Chamber
Temp - Inlet 1"U> 1^1 P-V
Temp - Exhaust " 1^1 "L^T- ^-^j
Temp-Cham. #1 lower bed 3[A_ ID 3)^7
Temp- Chant U2 lower bed ~Z< ~L 2-W
Temp - Cham #3 lower bed nfl I**
Temp-Cham #4 lower bed ^ i ( l>n 3l|
Temp-Cham #5 lower bed 7J/ J^ 1-1 I
Temp-Cham #6 lower bed "V t ll*l 1) ^
Temp - Cham #7 lower bed \(-O
Temp - Cham #8 lower bed
RTOAP
Pressure - Inlet Duct
Temp- Burner tt I
Temp - Burner #2
\S/Z
Output-Burner SI Cont. % fa'OlSO't M5'^
Output -Burner #2 Cont. % ^7.5'^gi JJj3
Output - Burner S3 Cont. % (Q-cf I^O IO.Q
Setpomt - Burner S\ Coot. *F t&?
-------
SENT BYHOUISIANA-PACIFIC ', 3-25-81 ', i:*7PH I ENGINEERING OEPT.'
/
:« 2'
DRYER DATA SHEET
DATE 7'Z8-9*T
BY
PLANT:
REVOLUTIONS par MINUTE:
(NOTE ANY CHANGES IN 8ETPONTS)
FUEL CALIBRATION:
TIME
OUTLET
SET
POINT
RATE
DRTfEH
IMLET
TEMP
OUTLET
TEMP
FUEL
COUWT
BIN
LEVEL
BUR CORE
DRY BIN
LEVEL
EVERY HOUR
FLAKE UOISTURE
N
our
/1 3
5*7°
'/f
8 .'
/A
I'.oo
'30
I93T
ft
/
S67
/*//
-full
i/.'/t'
X/.,^0
1*L
£•0
/:en
MQ.
3*20
'A.
-------
DATA SHET
.DATE: 7 > 1 $
SHIFT:
CREW:
OPACI TY.,0 RYE ft CHARTS:
BURNER OUTLET SET POINT:
OUT LET TE MP SE T POl NT:
REVOLUTIONS'PER MlNUTE:_
FUEL CALIBRATION:
CHECK AND 1 HIT IAI. EVE RY.30 MINUTES
[_READING fs/ERY3D.
MOISTURE %lEVERY HOUR
BiN;LEVE L EVE RY HOUR
NOTE AW CHANGES IN SETPOiNTS
TIME REED DRYER
DRYER OUT
DRY EI1T
C-PA CITY DRYER C»
m LET TEMP LET
m
ttr
a
OK CIRCtJLAR
7:30
/r
>3:CO
32.
a.
8:30
3:00
I .
ins
33
66
3:30
///f
10:00
If I
10:30
n/
tf.a.
11:00
fS
11:30
12:00
/s
/?£.
12:30
.X-
1:OD
n&-
.
/(.A
3:00
IS
VU
3-3. .
3:30
£0
:CO
4:30
ts
£10
5:00
If
HS*)
5:30
1S
\*^ m \w* i
I -^ ^_.«. I .T ^1 I . . - • >
m;
-------
APPENDIX O
FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DATA
-------
B T S , INC.
METER CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
Contract No. RECO
Job I.D.
Meter Box No.: 8
Delta K; 1.7393
Gamma: 1.0166
Analyst: $r
Calibration Datei OS/22/95
Teat Meter No. 9548
Barometric Pressure 28.97
Print Date 05/23/95
QA/QC Check:
Previous cal JLbr^t&oiT Date• 12/29/94
Previous Gamma: 1.0054
JRun
i
2
3
4
5
6
l__
I 1 « ~
Orf] Initial) Final
Set] Teat j Teat
1 1
I I
0.5|B45. 339)858. 146
1 I
1 1
1.0|858.4S8J870.278
1 I
1 1
1.5)970.816)885.086
1 1
1 1
2.0(885. 316)895. 901
1 I
1 1
2.5(896.067(906.673
1 1
1 i
3.0(906. 865(918. 492
1 1
T — — 1 1 i 1 \
[Volume |lnit|Finl|Teet | Initial | Final
Test | Temp | Temp | Temp | Box | Box
111 1 1
1 i 1 i 1
12, B07J 72. 0(73. 0(72. 50 (738. 079(750.663
i i 1 1 1
(111 1
11 . 820 | 73 . 0 | 73 . 0 | 73 . 00 | 750 . 972 | 762 . 647
III! 1
1 1 1 I 1
14. 270 | 73. 0 | 74. 0| 73. 50 j 763. 182 (777.321
1 1 I 1 1
I 1 1 1 I
10. 585 | 74. 0| 75. Oj 74. 50 (777. 541 (788.090
i 1 1 1 1
1 I i 1 1
10 . 606 I 74 . 0 | 74 . 0 1 74 . 00 | 788 . 267 | 798 . 861
lit 1 1
1 I 1 1 1
11 . 627 | 74 . 0 | 75 . 0 | 74 . 50 | 799 . 071 ( 810 . SOI
1111 1
1
[Volume |l-I
Box | Temp
1
1
12.589|75.0
1
1
11.675(79.0
I
1 .
14.139)75.0
1
1
10.549)80.0
1
1
10.594(82.0
1
1
11.430185.0
I
11 I ! " I 1 1 J 1
1-0 |F- I |F-0 (Temp (Time (Delta Hj Gamma
| Temp | Temp | Temp | | | (
I 1 | 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
73. 0 | 79. 0 | 76. 0 1 75. 75 1 30. 0(1. 58893 (1.02223
1 1 1 1 1 I
I 1 1 1 1 1
76. 0 | 78. 0 | 83. 0 | 79. 00 j 20. 0(1. 65121 | 1.02122
111 I 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1
75 . 0 | 83 . 0 J 78 . 0 | 77 . 75 1 22 . 0 1 2 . 06485 1 1 . 01345
I 1 II 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
77.0|79.0|B1.0J79,25|13.0|1.748B4|1. 00722
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 1
79. 0 | 78. 0 | 86. 0 JB1. 25 | 11. 5 (1.69445 | 1.00833
1 t 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 i I 1
80.0|B1.0|B9.0J83.75|ll.S|l.68729|l. 02702
1(111 I
-------
LT.S. INC.
METER CONSOLE CPU BRAT ICN FORM
eter Box No
HERXOCORE NUMBE3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
19
11
a
I
Reference
T*ipinature
9
39
301
400
REFERENCE CALIBRATOR
Dat
Theriocouple Difference
Teiperature *
t«7l CAL-K
9
23
301
797
0.357
0.009
0.099
0.000
0.203
9.094
0.172
0.233
0.147
Calibration Perfoned
Robtrton
AVERftK DIF
'ost Test Calibration-Contract t\-
loinnts:
-------
E.T.S. INC.
KETEH CONSOLE CflUBMTlCN FORM
terBoxNo 8 REFERENCE CALIBRATOR Wffl CflL-K
eJH3CORE WfffiER 2 Dati
Rifennci Theriocouplc Diffirinct
Ttiptraturt Ttipiraturt %
1 08 0(998
2 38 28 9,99 597 0.203
9 798 693 8.&S6
11 999 893 9.147
8.1SB flVESftSE DIFF
ian Perfaned By H.
Test Calibration-Contract l\-
ii-Ttst Calibration-Contract I-
i iints',
-------
LT.S. INC.
ICTER CONSOLE OU1RATION FORM
•RMKOUPLE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
a
9
3
Reftrince
Tiiptnture
a
38
188
288
338
4£8
508
800
788
Ftfei fcpJl^J^^iH^ M**h*J
Date .........
Theriocouple
Ttiperaturt
8
»
97
199
380
398
498
597
698
Diffirtnct
t
8. am
8.2f4
0.536
- 8.152
8.080
8.233
8.203
0.2B3
8.172
W71 CflL-K
10
II
libration Pirfsnid 3y
aw
798
899
R. Rabtrsfln
8.159
0.14?
0.198 flVERASE DIFF
st Test Calibration-Contract IV
e-Test Calibration-Contract I-
mtnts:
-------
tT.S. INC,
mm CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
!eter Box No
1£ NUMBER
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
a
9
19
11
4
Referenci
Teiperature
8
30
190
289
398
489
589
680
701
688
909
nt-T T-JiLi u-c WTfcpABivnuni
Dati
Thinocfluple
Teiperature
9
29
97
191
389
398
498
599
789
799
898
Diffinnci
8,889
9.294
6.534
8. IS
9.909
8.223
8.283
8.894
0.086
0.871
0.147
IBII 4 *^^_ i»
18-Hov-94
0.153 AVEnASE D1FF
Calibration Pirfarisd
R. Sober 5 on
st Test Calibration-Contract S\-
CalibrsUon-Cantrict I-
.nents:
-------
E.T.S. INC.
ICIER CDSOLE DUBWT10N FQ1W
eter
Ann Ma
HERMQCQUPIE NUKBEH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
a
5
Reference
Tiiperature
0
38
100
208
388
408
580
600
708
REFES8CE CflLlBRflTOR
Date
Thtriocauple Difference
Tupiraturt I
0
29
9ft
288
380
398
493
600
698
8.808
8.294
8.357
0.988
0,080
9.213
8.288
0.000
0.172
HH71 CflL-K
10
11
3alibraUon
808
908
Iv
793
8. Robirsan
0.159
8.147
0.135 fMOffic D1FF
Post Test Calibration-Contract 1\-
(Vt-Test Calibration-Contract i-
Conentf:
-------
E.T.S. INC.
METER CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
:RMOCOUPIE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
• • U IUk.1 MttniJV^^ WT»»J
6 Date
Reference Thenocouple
Tetpiraturi Teipirature
0 0
30 23
100 98
199 198
300 380
400 399
509 497
/ AA tftd
OKW oCO
709 699
LWIVll Wl«
Difference
0.0W
0.408
0.357
0.152
0.089
0.116
0.313
0.000
0.066
W71 CflL-K
10-Nov-94
18
11
880
900
798
893
ilibration Perfoned By R. Roberion
0.159
0.H7
0.153 AVERAGE D1FF
nt Test Calibration-Contnct l\-
i i-T«»t Calibration-Contract I-
nents:
-------
E.T.S. INC.
KETES OB«X£ CPLlBRflTlON FORM
Itter
Box No
rHERHOmw F MOTOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3
8
7
Reference
Teiperature
8
38
188
288
388
488
588
B88
788
REFERENCE CALIBRflTOR
Date
Theriocouple
Teiperaturt
8
29
98
288
328
398
498
fcW
653
Difference
X
8.888
8.284
8.357
8.888
8.888
8.233
8.288
8.088
8.172
CflL-K
18
11
Calibration Performed
880
"500
758
898
R. Roberson
8.147
8.135 AVERA6E DIFF
Post Test Calibration-Contract 8\-
Pre-Test Calibration-Contract I-
Conents:
-------
E T S , INC.
METER CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
Contract No. 95-400
Job I.D.
Meter Box No.; 11
Delta H; 1.1475
Gamma.* 0.9928
Analyst;
Print Date 03/17/95
___
7 03/17/95
Test Meter No. 9548
Barometric Pressure 28.83
QA/QC Check;
Previous Calibration Date:' 12/19/94
Previous Gamma: 0.9907
1 1 1
Run |0rfj Initial
|Set| Test
1
1
2
3
4
5
$
I
0.5(521.495
1
i
1.0(532.162
1
1
1.5(543.046
I
1
2.0J556.390
1
1
2.5(566.813
1
1
3.0(577.029
1
1
| Final
Test
(531.931
§42.655
556.281
566.660
576.831
588.015
J 1 — — 7 — 1 1 l
(Volume |lnit|Finl|Test | Initial j Final
Teat | Temp j Temp j Temp j Box j Box
i 1 1 1 1
till !
10. 436 | 75. 0 | 74. Oj 74. 50 j 270. 470 J281. 008
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 i I i
10 . 693 | 74 . 0 | 74 . 0 | 74 . 00 | 261 . 2SO | 292 , 097
(ill 1
1 I 1 1 1
13. 235 I 75.0 (75.0 (75.00 (292.268 (305.715
1 1 1 1 1
1111 1
10. 270 (77. 0(75. 0 ( 76 . 00 (305. 822 (316. 249
111 I 1
till 1
10. 018 | 75.0(77.0] 76. 00 (316. 392 (326. 606
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
10. 986 | 75. 0| 75. 0| 75. 00 (326. 764 (337. 923
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I ' I f " 1 '"1 """• 1
[Volume |I-I |I-O |F-I (F-O |Temp |Time|Delta H| Gamma
Box | Temp | Temp ( Temp | Temp j j j j
1 1 .. 1 1 1 11 1
1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1
10. 538 | 74. 0 | 75. 0| 78. 0(76. 0(75. 75 j 26. 5 (1.70131 JO, 99150
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
10. 847 (76, 0(79.0(84.0(78. 0(79. 25(19.0 (1.83576 (0. 99296
1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1
i I 1 I 1 i i I
13. 447 1 78. 0(83.0(86. 0(80. 0(81.75 (IS. 5 1 1.89163 (0.99285
(ill! 1 1 1
i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
10. 427 | 86. 0 | 80. 0 | Bl. 0 | 88. 0(83. 75 | 13. 0(1. 86175 (0.994 11
I I | 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1
10. 294 (90. 0(89.0(82.0 (90. 0(87. 75 (11. 5 (1.89992 (0. 98822
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
11 . 159 | 88 . 0 | 81 . 0 | 82 . 0 | 93 . 0 | 86 . 00 | 11 . 5 | 1 . 89482 ( 0 . 99711
1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1
-------
lettr Box No
LT.S. INC.
mm CONSOLE CJUISRTIQN FORM
No
IE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
&
7
a
9
10
ii
11
1
Rtftrenct
Tupirature
8
32
108
200
m
m
508
tea
709
889
901
REFERENCE CflUBRflTOft W71 CM -K
Date
ITiensceupli
Ttipirature
0
32
101
220 •
200
400
500
690
700
601
901
17-Sep-94
Diffirtnct
%
9. 900
0.900
-0.179
0.083
9.089
9.000
0.909
0.090
0.009
-9.079
0.000
-0.W3 flWERflBE DIFF
lalibration Ptrfomd By Kick Btrkhtad
'ost Ttst CilibraUon-Contract IV
Calibration-Contract f-
loiicnti;
-------
E.T.S. INC.
ere CONSOLE CALIBRATION mm
IKKQCQUPIE NUXBER
I
2
3
4
5
&
7
3
<)
10
11
• * *A tU^ kT"iuf™ '*L Irinkh
Rfftrenct Thtnocoupl*
Teiperaturt Tuptraturt
0 0
75 75
im 100
c08 200
309 £33
448 400
588 Ml
LQA Laa
Q6*P DV%1
709 fe^
S0« 800
Wl SW
nuwrirti wii>
Diffirinct
<
a. 080
0.090
&090
0.800
0.13£
0.000
0.104
0.000
0.0S6
0.808
0.073
W71 CflL-K
0.036 (WERftSE 01FF
librarian Ptrfomd Sp Nick Sffkhtad
5t Test Calibfitittn-Contrict t\-
Calibration-Cimtract I-
-------
E.T.S. INC.
3 CO60LE CfiLIBRflTION FORM
Post Test Calibration-Contract l\-
Pre-Test Calibration-Contract I-
Conents:
let er Box No 11 REFERENCE CfllLBRATOR W71 CPL-K
n€RKJCOUPlE NWfflER 3 Date 17-Sep-W
Reference Thenocouple Difference
Teiperature Teiperature %
i a a 0.000
c TJ 7j 0> 999
3 1W 100 0.000
4 2*0 aea 0.000
5 300 300 0.000
& 420 400 0.000
8 &00 60a 0.000
9 tvo 017 «• uQD •
10 800 800 0.030
11 301 900 0.073
0.024 AVERACC D1F?
Calibration Perfoned By Nick Berkhead
-------
E.T.S. INC.
KETER CONSOLE OUBRRTIQN FORK
t«riaxN« II REFEHSCE CAIURflTOR JW1 CfiL-K
.HKOCOUPli NWBER 4 Date 17-S«fH4
Rtfirtnct Thtriocouplt Differtnet
Tupirattjrt Tciperaturt %
\ 0 9 0.W9
Z 32 32 e.(N»
3 l£8 I®} ^.^f^
4 CCo CvV v* D Vv
S 5M 399 8,*Ja
7 S30 588 8.833
8 600 £00 0.000
^ Tftft TPSfl ft ifffiiS
18 fiS9 3d0 0iBS^0
i i Qffll Qflt A tiffld
*,m flVERftffi DIF
ilibrition Perforud By Mick Btrkhiad
;it list Calibratien-Cantract l\-
*i-T«t Calibration-Contract t-
-------
E.T.S. INC.
METER CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
liter Box No
NUfflER
11 REFERENCE CAILBRflTOR
5 Date
I
2
3
A
5
6
7
a
9
19
u
Calibration Perfoned By
Rtfertnce Thenocouple Difference
Teiperature Teiperaturt X
32
199
309
880
W71 CflL-K
17-S«p-94
399
409
599
E>00
799
689
901
9.999
9.009
9.0919
0.009
9.909
0.009
9.099
0.909 AVERAGE DIFF
Hick Birkhead
Post Test Calibration-Contract I
Pre-Tist Calibration-Contract I-
Comnts:
-------
Niter Box No
THEIWCOUPUE NUMBER
1
a
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
11
E.T.S, INC.
mm CONSOLI CPUMATION FORM
REFERENCE CftlLBWTQR
mi CflL-K
fitfinnci ThtriocoupU Difftnnct
Ttiptrature Ttipmturt %
a a 8.«ee
33 32 0.W6
t«M 168 e.W
m m i.eee
sea
689
in
m
0.383
9.W8
8.8C3 AVCtf£c DIF
Calibration Perfomd B/ ,, Kick Strkheid
Post T«t Calibration-Contract I
Prt-Tist Caiibrat ion-Contract I-
Conents:
-------
E.T.S. INC.
CTER CONSOLE CflLJBRflTIGN FORM
WERMOCOJPLE NUXKR
1
2
2
4
5
6
7
a
$
7
Rifirtnci
Tiiperaturi
0
32
100
200
300
408
580
609
700
Date ,
Thtnocauple
Ttiptraturt
0
32
100
200
300
400
508
680
700
Oiffinnci
$
0.000
0.800
0.000
0.800
0.000
0.800
0.000
e.m
0.000
mi CM.-K
11
^libration P«rfoned
800
901
Mick Berkhead
0.900
DIFF
3ost T«t Calibration-Contract l\-
lonents:
-------
.r /
Siie
(ii.
•Hi
. J/J"
Sid, -3-
(Ls. /.C.)
*
- -iverzga C^, i Q.ai
- ivy. c^,_, i a.
-------
EPA METHOD 20
INTERFERENCE RESPONSE TABLE
Date:
Analyzer Type:
Serial Number.
Span Value:
04/15/93
Oxygen
111917
25 %
Test Gas Type
CO
CO2
SO2
NOx
Total
Concentration
(ppmdv)
488
9.98
231
232
Analyzer
Output
0.009
0.015
-0.022
-0.014
% of Span
0.0004
0.0006
0.0009
0.0006
0.0024
% of Span = (Analyzer output response / Instrument span) x 100
The sum of the (% of Span) values should not exceed 2%.
-------
H2THOD 20
IHTEHFZBENCZ R2S30NS2
DATS
S: CD/j)
— ^-t -f
ANALYZER TYPE:
SERIAL NUX3ER:
TEST GAS TY2S
so<^
KjOx.
CO
0^
TOTAL
CCNCrSTPJ^ION
(ppndv)
-zso.s:
7."L3
5^4
Zt. 0%
ANALYZED
OUTPUT
O«oc)
^.OJ
O-OO
o.fi3
% C? S3AN
6-oO
0.05
O-OO
o.|5
O-7_O
..% 02. S2JLCL.= (AHAL2223-OUTPUT RZS20NS2/I3ST21IS£Z2IZ_S2AS.)- Z-100-
The sua of th.s (% of Span) Ta_luss should nor. excasd 2%.
-------
REFERENCE METHOD CALIBRATION DATA
PAGE OF
ANALYZER ID;
UIIITS:
SOURCE ID; |
I -OCATION:
TECHNICIAN; L.
I)ATJS(S) :
/to/
ANALYZER CALIBRATION
RANGE
ZERO
LOW
HIGH
OTHER
GAS
CYLINDER ID
^ 'kt-lT&l
CD, AtKoi?'?y<
CD, AU4 oV^ftr.?
GAS
VALUE
O
H-Z4-
I7,?|
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
-.oQi&a
*-42.
I7.--?/
ERROR
% SPAN
0-6
o.T
6- a
TIME
ir*4s
Jl'^
II '37
SYSTEM BIAS AND' DRIFT
RUN ID
RANGE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
SYSTEM DIAS
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
1
ADSOLUTE
ERROR
ERROR
% SPAN
•
?
TIME
SYSTEM DRIFT
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
ABSOLUTE
ERROR
ERROR
% SPAN
'
TIME
•
\WPDOC\JT FORMS\CEM1.DOC
-------
H2TSOD 20
INTEXF2RZHC2 KZS20NSZ
DATS:
. to
ANALYZES, T33S:
SERIAL BT
Yf -
- S- 5 3
T2ST GAS TY32
0
/-}
/J^
6«, ' '
*>!
TOTAL
CONCSNTRA2IOM
(ornadT)
>/.1
Xi^ -
•,/?.<5 V
2JLV
AHALTSSR
OU'i1^ U1!
" 0/ f
^, 0
'O.fo
» Q$
-. 6^^
% 0? S2AH
i
- °.OC»7
<9,OOO |
O.c»OO 1
i
o, ooo !
.^» OQ»7
... ...% 02. S2AH..- (AHALT2Z2-.OU'i'jiU'i1 R2S20NS2/IHSTHD2i2CZ-S2AE). £.100.
Tie sxsi of the (% o£ Span.) reluss should not exceed 2%.
-------
REFERENCE METHOD CALIBRATION DATA
PAGE OF
ANALYZER IDi
UNITS:
SPAN:
SOURCE ID;
/"I
7^? /
LOCATION :
TECHNICIAN:
DATE(S) :
ANALYZER CALIBRATION
RANGE.
ZERO
LOW
HIGH
OTHER
GAS
CYLINDER ID
I >
4-Y- S2W?<^
flL*t-?05W
.xitfj^iysw/
J&4 ,/o J^'S
GAS
VALUE
n A/o
^af
.»v
J>1O
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
a-o
JPO
J>7
?CH>
ERROR
% SPAN
O
O.7.1-
0.33
b,33
TIME
Jl^Zo
n.'zs
H : 2 S
/HZ3
SYSTEM DIAS AND' DRIFT
RUN ID
"-~ '
' •
RANGE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
—
SYSTEM BIAS
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
======
|
I
ABSOLUTE
ERROR
..
=_»=
ERROR
% SPAN
— —
I
TIME
-^^-
SYSTEM DRIFT
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
ABSOLUTE
ERROR
ERROR
% SPAN
TIME
_^
F:\WPDOC\JT FORMS\CEH1.DOC
-------
METHOD 20
IHTS3Z23Z3CZ HZS20NSZ
DUTS:
*
AJOLYZER TZ3S: AJ
TEST GaLS TY3S
^
6°'
6^,
^°x
TO TUj
CCSCZHTSA2ION
(ppnciv)
3(.T
^*w •
^ 1<3 V '. '
•Xi-S
AIQLTZ2R
OTTTPuT
0,o if
o ^ 1-
o.o^'
Q.°-i'f
0,0^
o ,ofb
I x
OE. S2
2-100-
The SMS. of tie (% of Spaa) values should aot exceed. 2%.
-------
REFERENCE METHOD CALIDIlfVTION DATA
PAGE OF
ANALYZER
UIIITS:
ID: jj $
/M
SOURCE ID: "Jl1/^cJ
LOCATION
1 £T>
X lotft*£2£,i
SPAN: <^*,
V^HCC OUJ*.
TECHNICIAN: L> S
*
l)ATE(S) :
/o /
c / f1/
ANALYZER CALIBRATION
RANGE
ZERO
LOU
HIGH
OTHER
GAS
CYLINDER ID
Ax -J-'OX
¥-*V
j Xo 'b toni6i
3M«5 ftUi'MMl,
GAS
VALUE
/^o.
P-'a "s
^5/
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
D
JXn?
451
ERROR
% SPAN
O
a
#
TIMI?
/J.-j.^
/a.-%-
;-Z..' Z9
nVS'l'KM DIAS AND' DRIFT
IUJN ID
=««-—
1
RANGE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ZERO
UPSCALE
ANALYZER
RESPONSE
/ '
.»«-_-
'
. =«
SYSTEM DIAS
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
•
ABSOLUTE
ERROR
" » n. ....,..•.
ERROR
% SPAN
~—
— .
TIME
—
"' *" •»*
**
SYSTEM DRIFT
SYSTEM
RESPONSE
ABSOLUTE
ERROR
-" '
ERROR
% SPAN
_ —
— — —
— —
TIME
iiiimtl.-.'lMi.iliiiin inn I .'illliiilln.i.
.DOC
-------
ETS, Inc
NOx ANALYZER CONVERTER CHECK
TEST INFORMATION
Analyzer Manufarturer.
Model No.:
Serial No:-
Span Setting (ppm):
NO Gas Value:
N02 Gas Value:
Date:
Technician:
ANALYZER RESPONSE
Prepared Sample
time
(min)
1
2
3
4
- " 5
response
(ppm)
1.2%
lj$
time
(min)
16
17
,
- /rt ^
^^^i a 9(
*i nA ' *~** f~O^*
~>%1
1%1
23 xSS
24 alV
10 tl§7 I 25 If?
11
12
13
2§(o
7^7
1.9\f
26 i|t
- 27 2.B1
*5Q *1 *9 Ct
-------
1ST
i
•3 naig'iTuuuut
s*
ST"
&ii. ...
672
i .. a
/_
^
-------
Scott Specialty Gases
17SD EAST CLUB iOUUSVARQ, DURHAM. NC 27704
FAX'(919)2ZXHQ8
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Cuitomer
ETS.INC.
Aon: Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal RoadNW
Roacoke, VA 24QI2
Assay laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 East Club Boolemd
Dorian, NC 27704
Purdui« Order 5502
Scott Project * 12-11635
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
•.Certified Co exceed the minimum specifications of EPA Protocol Procedure SGI. issocd September, 1993.
Cylinder Number ALM-004542 Certification Date 05-12-95 Expiration Date 05-12-9S
\ Cylinder Praiure 2000 PSIG Previous Certificatiga None
ANALYZED CYLINDER
Component*
.Oxygen
• Carbon Dioxide
'Nitrogea
" Dg DO* i» «tai cytuia (mami a Ico ihia U9 P3KL
Certified Concenrrarioji
9M V.
10.09%
Pncertaintv*
+/- 1% N1ST Directly Traceable
+/- 1% JdST Directly Traceable
Balance
id oar * praeinaa rf 6e t
. ^REFERENCE STANDARD
i.-Type Eipiratioa Date
•!rKnLM«( 2658 11-96
.VNJRM* 1675 09-95
: •:'• INSTRUMENTATION
laJrftfiiaeoE/Model/Serial $
Vmaa/3400/16804
^£".?..^ANALYZER READINGS
Cylinder ffumber
ALM-031SSS
ALM-032766
Last Date Calibrated
04-19-95
Conceatrarion
9.68% O2 Balance in N2
14.01% CO2 Balance in N2
Analytical Principle
Gas CSrosaatogsrphy
R-Reftrmce Css T-TalGo r-Corrriuioa dcfSdatt)
.
>*.
< Catapoaeati
^
- ' •
•
First Triad AaaiysU
DUK tB-U-W R<*ynm» thin; Aid
STIXQ3I29 SPL-^*OU2
SPL-M06M SID-I3*O7
STD-UiJII SFL-26016I
4?v2K G^>13*7J Jtopomo iifltffKr Aimi
STD-1IOJ33 SPL-119O2
SPL-tt9S35 STD-iTZMl
STD-25312* SPL-ltWO
STT>- SPL-
SPL- sn>
5TD- SPL-
Secood Triad Analysis
|%^«»- J^00MMOMBC
StD- SFL"
SPL- sn>
STD- SK."
sto- sn-
Ouc: ItooaaMUiitt
STD" Jft-
SPL- JTD-
STD" SPL"
Calib radon Carve .
Due 94-19-93
ft. fi^4r^V_
Analyn B. Bectoa
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1KU hAb riLUa HUULhVARU. DUHHAM. NU7//
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ETS, INC.
Ann; Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal RoadNW
Roanoke.VA 24012
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 East Club Boulevard
Duriaxn,NC 277D4
Purchase Order 5129
Scott Project* 12-08743
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Certified to exceed the minimum specifications of EPA Protocol Procedure SGI, issued September, 1993.
Cylinder Number ALM-045671 Certification Date 10-05-94 Expiration Date 10-05-97
Cylinder Pressnre 1915 PSIG Prtviouj Certification None
ANALYZED CYLINDER
Components
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
' Do ooc 034 wbea cylmda ^amui. a loi &n 130 PSIG.
l tmcsuinfy is mcbniv* of smJ faiDWM mw K
Certified Concentration
17.25 V.
22.1 V.
i wtbch a lent inctafcj of a
Analytical Uncertainty*
+/- IV. MST Directry Traceable
+/- IV. MST Traceable
Balance
r A PTCCBTJOB of «bi c
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type Expiration Date
NTRMSM675 09/95
GMIS 12/95
INSTRUMENTATION
InJtrament/Model/Serial #
Varian/5400/0160
Varian/3400/16804
Cylinder Number
ALM-032766
KLM-000274
Last Date Calibrated
09-14-94
09-14-94
Concentration
14.01 % Balance in Nitrogen:
20.98 % Balance in Nitrogen
Analytical Principle
Gas Chromaiography
Gas Chromatography
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-ZcroCa R-RrftrmccC« T-TotGo i-Cortrteioo GwfnoStnt)
Components First Triad Analysis Second Triad Analysis Calibration Curve
CctnaDioDdo
Oxyja>
Dito* lft~4tf~9^ j^—p^^p^ Unijj; ^^IA
jlT^* j T6600 Si^^^l | J62
SPL-niJJl SFL-709J09
STD- SPL-
JPL- SPL-
STTD- STD*
Dun IO-OJ-94 RopooK Uaitt An*
SPL-H09Z4 SPL-I19S33
Dun Rttponu Unitt:
STD- SPL-
SPt- SPL-
STD- STD-
DUB; P^irHin (Jane
no- JPL-
SPL- SPl-
STD- STD-
DUE: Reapcxa. Uaiic
STD- SPT.-
SPL- SPL-
STD- STD-
CX.fiQAfi>^K
Anaryst A. Barber
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1720 EAST CLUB BOULEVARD, DURHAM. NC 27704 (919) 220*3803 FAX: (919) 2204808
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ETS, Lac.
Amu Bill Hays
1401 Municipal Road NW
Roanoke.VA240l2
Assay Laboratory
Scot: Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 East Club Boulevard
Durham, NC 27704
Purcbue Order
Scott Project *
5345
12-10343
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Certified ca exceed the minimum specificao'ooi of EPA Protocol Procedure #01, issued Septnnber, 1993.
Cylinder Number AAL-7446 Certincatioii Date 02-14-95 Expiration Date 02-14-97
Cylinder Pressure 1841PSIG Previous Certification None
ANALYZED
Cojippnents Certified Concentration " Afl3!^"!Uncertainty*
Nitric Oxide 150.0 PPM
NOX 150.0 PPM
Nitrogen
DQ o« ase «feea cfKnia yrtasart is lea duo ISO PSG. •
'Analytical unewaiaty ii iattejvt. af Baal Va8«a cam xmrca which n last induda rd"erac< ttudgri trror A prtdnon of fee aosagaen
+/- 1% NlST Directly Traceable
Reference Value Only
Balance
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type Expiration Date
NTRM» 1695
NTRM* 1686
08-96
08-96
INSTRUMENTATION
Initrument/Model/Serial *
NICOLET / S220 / AAB9400252
Cylinder Number
ALM-036429
ALM-025095
Last Date Calibrated
01-26-95
Concentration
245.3 PPM Balance in Nitrogen
495 PPM Balance in Nitrogen
Analytical Principle
FTK.
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-rern Cu R»RcfertBee Gu T-Test Gu r-ComiadiM Coeffldtnt)
Components
Nitric Oxiik
Fi rst Triad Analyiu
Due: 02-OT-95 Ropoew UUIK FPM
Zl-0.4«0 K2-24&I 23*4214
R1-24JJ Z2~0.HO TJ-149J
T1-J49J T1-U9J R3-24*,4
Date Rrspocna Uaio;
21- 82- Z3-
Rl- 22- T3-
Tl- T2- R5-
Second Triad Analyiii Calibration Carve
Date 02- !4-45 RopooM Urncc PPM
2I~OJJ9 K-49J.4 2J-OJ20
RJ-«9J.O 22H3.07I TJ-1491
TI-149.7 T2-I49.1 M-4«jS
Dwe Rcpomo Uias
Zl- R2- 23-
Rl- 22- 13-
Tl- T3- M-
Zl- R2- Z3-
Rl- 22- T1-
T1- T2- R3-
Zl- R2- 23-
Rl- 22- Tl- .
T1- T2- 13-
Dne
Die
'.^nrti
Aaalyn M. Moms \
-------
|1 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
17SD EAST CLUB BOULEVARD. DURHAM. NC 27704 (913)2200803 FAX (919)220*808
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ETS. Inc.
Ann: Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal Road NW
Roanokc.VA 24012
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
17SO East Club Boulevard
Durham, NC 27704
Purchase Order 5129
Scon Project # 12-08743
Certified to exceed the minimum specifications of EPA Protocol Procedure *G1. issued September, 1993.
Cylinder Number ALM-045665 Certification Date 10-11-94 Expiration Date 10-11-96
Cylinder Pressure 1875 PSIG Previous Certification None
ANALYZED CYLINDER
Components
Nitric Glide
NOX
Nitrogen
Do DOI toe when cylinder inuuuiu is leu &JD 130 P3IG.
'Anitatul uccnuify a bchinve oTaxul kM*n caor toora fctiich u !uu iactada refrraco ttrakrd ctnr A pndum of da i
Certified Concentration
225 PPM
227 PPM
Analytical UncertainCv*
+/- 1% NTST Directly Traceable
Reference Value Only
Balance
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type Eipiradon Date
NTTLVtf 1685 08/96
. NTTLM2 1686 07/95
INSTRUMENTATION
Insmiment/Model/Serial tt
NICOLET / 8220 / AAB9400252
NO: Horiba/ClA53A/850658093
Cylinder Number
ALM-036516
ALM-022384
Last D«te Calibrated
09-24-94
10-10-94
Concentration
245.4 PPM Balance in Nitrogen
492 PPM Balance in Nitrogen
AotrvTical Principle
FT1R
Chffmihiminfwnt
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-Z TJ-
Tl- T2- W-
DUK 10-11-94 XapooH Uoiac P?)A
Z1HJ.6 R2-49Z.1 Z3-a7
RJ-49M Z2-0.1 T3-S4I
Tl-n-U T>224J E3-49L4
^il£^ BfryxMH Uttifil
ZI- R> Z3-
RI- ZZ- TJ-
TI- Ti- R3-
Diic* l^ffpiTHt^ Uui&i
Zl- R> Z3-
Rl- Z2- T3-
Tl- T> R3-
D*1** KapoBH UBXK
Zl- R2- Z3-
RI- n- TJ-
Tl- T2- RJ-
DuKtO-1044
DlK
Duo:
Anaivst K-Cookc
-------
213-565-2154
FAX* 213-5ASOS82
LIQUID CARBONIC
.
\ CWUNDEH GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUIHAUMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES, CA 90058
,-USTOMEH EHV. ft IWJUST. DIST,
P.ONUMBBI 041994-1
iMPONEIfr
LFUR DIOXIDE GUIS
.."*;«. 1694*
CYLINDER XO.
SA 6231
CONCENTRATION
98.4 ppn
O.VCPONENT SULFUR 010X106 GMIS
kXAJLYTlCAl. PRINCIPLE NO I ft
.TKST ANALYSIS DATE 05/16/94
2 0.0 R . 91.6 C 94.9
R 98.9 Z 0.0 C 95.4.
0.0 C 95.4 t R 98.9
C/M ppm ..."
Jc
C=*GAS CAttDlDATE
CONC.
CONC.
CONC./94.9
MEAN TEST ASSAV 94.8 ppra^^
ANALYZERMAK&MODEL^N slum Uttramat 5E S/N C1-009" '
. LAST CALIBRATION DATE .05/20/94
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE 05/24/94
R96.1 C 92.2
zo.o c 91.9
C 92.4 R 96.2
CONC. 94.4 ppa
CONC. 94.0 ppm
94,5 pp,
Values net valid below 150 psfg
\
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 477$" ) |
HAS BEEN CKRlUlfcJU ACCORDING TO SECTION EPA-4QO/H93/224
OF TRACEABIL1TY PROTOCOL NO. R«v. 9/93 t
PROCEDURE 81 ff
CEK1U1EU ACCURACY t 2 * NIST TRACEABLE
CYLINDER PRESSURE 2000 PSIG i
CERTIFICATION DATE 05/24/94 V^
05/24/96 TERM *Z4 W3JTHS
C£K1"1I"KD GONCENTRAT1ON
SILAS DICK10E 94.6 pp
KITTOGEN ' BALANCE
ANALYZED BY
CEHTlflED BY
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 EAST CLUB BOULEVARD, DURHAM, NC 277O4 C31^) 2200603
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ETS.INC.
Attn: Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal Road NW
Roanoke,VA240l2
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Amy Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 East Gub Boulevard
Durham, NC 27704
Purchase Order 5129
Scott Project* 12-08743
Certified to exceed the tnmmmm specifications of EPA Protocol Procedure ftGl, issued September. 1993.
Cylinder Number ALM-045690 Certification Date 10-11-94 Eipirarion Dale 10-11-96
Cylinder Pressure 1950PSIG Previous Certification None
ANALYZED CYLINDER
Component!
Sulfur Dioxide
Nitrogen
Do no! HM >bn cylinder prcum ii lea Sam DO PSIG.
•Aulxool imcmiisry a actmM ofmulkaawa am
Certified Concentration
22J PPM
«txh it Ion Bclaaci refercac* aadiri t
Ajal\-rical Uncertainty*
+/- 1% NtST Directly Traceable
Balance
REFERENCE STAiNPARD
Type Expiration Date
GMIS
NTRMS0260
05-96
06-96
•INSTRUMENTATION
Instrument/Model/Serial # .
-LOWS02: Horita/AlA2JAS/85065816l
Cylinder Nomb«r
ALM-017302
AAL-I4148
Last Date Calibrated
09-16-94
Concentration
498 PPM Balance in Nitrogen
260 J PPM Balance in. Nitrogen
Analytical Principle
NDR
ANALYZER READINGS (2-z.n. c.
T-Tot CD r-Correbdoa Cocffldent)
Component! First Triad Analysis Second Triad Analysis Calibration Curve
3ntfor Dioxide
Due: 10-04-W Ropcac L'uK PPM
ZI-0.0 RI-497J Z3-1.1
JU-49U Z2-1.1 TJ-ZM.7
Tl-EO TJ-234-4 R>N9tJ
Dcuc 10-U-J4 S0BOC04 Uate PPM
ZI-O.I K2-MU Z3-0.1
RJ-261.1 23-0.0 T>ZZJ.9
Duo: KaeogM UoiK
Zl- K> Z3-
U' 22- T3-
Tl- . T> «-
Zl- R2- Z3-
Rl- Z2- T3-
Due: RjryoQM Cgac
Zl- R> 23-
Rl- Z> T3-
Tl- T> R>
0iit^ PifTfKfnf^ UQIDI
Zl- R2- Z3-
Rl- Z> 13-
Tl- T2- RJ-
DIK-. 5r>i6^4
Due:
DUR
Analyst K.Cooke
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1730 EAST CLUB BOULEVARD. DURHAM. NC277O4
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ETS.INC.
Attn; Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal Road NW
Roanoke,VA24012
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
A*tay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1750 East Club Boulevard
Durham. NC 27704
Purchase Order 4886
Scott Project # 12-07484
Certified to exceed the "nninr"m specifications ofEPA Protocol Procedure *G1 , issued September, 1 993. •• *
'-Cyttader Number AAL-2I323 Certification D*te 06-27-94 . Expiration Date 06-27-97
- Cylinder Pressure 1915 PSIG Previous Certification None .
•
ANALYZED CYLINDER
Component!
.Carbon Monoxide
-i Nitrogen
• Do not m vfcca cylinder prom B Icniha 130 PSIG.
*Anjfyo'cjJ aicauhty a bchuivxi of am] tatawo oror toat
Certified Concentration
300 PPM
An «hrt|al_XJn certdatr* ' • .^- •;.
+/- 1% N1ST Directly Traceable
Balance
cet «Uct u fed iatlado ntmaa tnaWJ qjry A procaioB of Ifa
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type Erpimrion Date
2636 12/94
t
(inderNnmb«r /
M^24902 /
* » /
Concentration
243 J. PPM Balance in Nitrogen '-
'"' Varian/3400/16804
-\~r: :
f~ •• *
_ ANALYZER
Lait Date Calibrated
06-03-94 £
Analytical Principle
GasC
(ZfZmG** R-Rrferrocc Ca T-TtstCm I—Corrttrtton Cocffldcrt)
Components
CotmiMoDciwU
First Triad Analysis
Second Triad ABarjsii
CaUbrttion Carre
06.17-94
yro-n«u SFL-UMJ
3PL-I440* 3Pt-|43flCt
STD-II3I3 STD-1I79I
Doc OS-I7.94
rro-mn sFL-i«9to
STD-I1M1
STD-UITl
T. Rchards
Due gi»in.»iir«in
ST^~ SPL-
3PL- SPL-
ST1>- STI^
STT>- SPL"
JPt- Stf.-
flb- STD-
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
179Q EAST CUUS BOULEVARD, DURHAM, NC 277D4
(919)2ZX3SC3 FAX: piSJ 22D4KB
r
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
ITS. INC.
Atm: Bill Hayes
1401 Municipal Road NW
Raaaok*, VA 24012
• m
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Cues, Ihc
1750 East Club Boulevard
Dnrtu»ni,NC 27704
Parcbaie Order 4826
Scots Project # 12-07484
to exfieed the minianm specifications ofEPA Protocol Procedure Wl, issued September, 1993.
ierNoinber MM-G1932S " Certflatfon Dtte / 06-27-94 Ixpintlea
1915 PSIG Prwioui Certiftcsaaii | Neue
06-27-97
» .4^'
CYUNDtR
Carbon Mo no ride
f ft
>tai cy !IB&> jmnan »lo* *• UO niO.
a iaettBr-« of ian«l fagw» arar «
Cerrifled Concenmriom
S94PPM
nnctTtmintv*
*/- IV. N1ST Witcdy Tnoable
Balaau
• loa jacMet refund naxl . s?L"
spt- sn.-
ST^D""* nX5**
Dfcic* 209Q0" Un&c
SIB- SH,-
JR-- $PL-
SPL-W15I SPL-J0306
f>B»- Ofr-CTHM
STD- SFL"
SH." SPt-
D-K
DMK gi»j»nni» Lfgiic
SID- 111-
spt- at,-
STD- STI>
X. ^
<* ~~~£&* djfjtitfP
Xiulyit T Ricto£
•..
-------
213-58S-21S4
FAXI 213-58S-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH AlAMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90058
CUSTOMER EMV. & IHOUST. DIST.
P.O NUMBER 011894-2
COMPONENT
CARBON MONOXIDE GUIS
NISTSRMNO.
vs 1601b
CYLINDER NO.
CC 43665
CONCENTRATION
950 ppn
R*> REFERENCE STAND AXD
Z=ZERO CAS
C*GAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT CARBON HONCXIDE CM IS
ANALYZER MAKE-MO DEL-S/N Sfeaens Ultramar 5E S/N A1Z-729
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
2 0 R 950
R 950 2 0
Z m> ACCURACY ± 1 * NIST TRACEABLE
CYLINDER PRESSURE 1650 PSIG
CERTIFICATION DATE 02/07/94
EXPDJATION DATE 02/07/97 TERM 36 MOUTHS
Ci_RTUlKD CONCENTRATION
CAJtSCM HCNQXJDE 897 ppn
HITItOGEM BALANCE
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
KUAM T. YOUNG
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
1290 COMBERMERE STREET; TROY. Ml 43083
(810)589-2350 FAX:(810) 569-2134
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
C A E INSTRUMENT RENTAL
246 WOODWORK LANE .
PALATINE, IL 60067
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specially Oiwy Inc
1290 Combanme
Troy. MI 4*083
Purchase Order: 12908-85-7333
Scott Project/*: S76J95
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
This certification w»» performed f^^^^g EPA Tnceafaility Protocol For Assay and Cmifieanan of Gaseous
Cylinder Number: ALM0055I5
Cylinder Pressure +: 1100 prig
Certificate Date: 1/3V95 Explndoo Dite:
Prcvioiu CerttfiotB Dmte: 5-3-93
.
••''"* Cprnponents
Propiae
24^8 ppm
±1% POST Directly Traceable
Balance GAS: Nitrogen
+Oo oof ue wbca cyttDCta- t»tmuim a bdaw 150 ps§.
: *Aa«MicalieeanevBbdua^ofMailtaioi»BOTorjpinpBwhichillealiadiida preoncn ofdia uujuiniimtt
INFERENCE STAEfDARD
Type Expiratioo Date
"SRM 2643A
Cylinder Number
SX-20290
Cooceotratioa
99.12 pparPropaac in Nitrogen
CSSTRtlMENTATTQN
Instrnment/Model/Seiiai tt
Propane: Beckman/400/1002059
Last Date Calibrated
I/16V95
AoalytieaJ Principle
Flame lonization Detector
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-Zero Gu R-Reftrtnee Gas T-T« Gis r-Correlation Coefficient)
ComponeoO
Propane
Fint Triad Analysis
Second Triad Analysis
Calibration Carve
T2H100
23^.00 TXIOO RM100
A^. Cone rfCu*. CA 2<-S8 wn)
RI^SLIO TI-24.W
R2-ea.10 Z2-O.OJ T3-24.80
ZXLOO TVJ4.80 R>«110
A«g. Core rf CUM. Cyt Z«.7» pom
r*l. 00000
SRM2B43A
[MLOOOOOOOOO
c>a.aoooooooo
E4.0QOOQGOQO
Special Notes
Cyliade
Analyst
(7
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
6141 EASTQN ROAD. P.O. BOX 310, PLUMStEADVJU£. PA f »«<310 (215) 76M861 FAX" / -./ .^
! ' :"
List Date Calibrated
07-16-94
•v
Concentration
95.5 ppm QH« in Ni
Analytical Principle
FID
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-Zero CM R-Rrfucnce Ota T-TetfCUa rCorolation CorfRdenQ
•'•*rTri-"Components Hrst Triad Analysis
;> Second Triad Analysis
Calibration Carre
D.* 08-08-94 Ropera* Unite Afn
n-oooooo la-ioszso Ti-ascssz
K2-10S250 Z2-000000 T>O50890
Z3-000000 T3-QS09C4 K3-1CSS3O
Avg. Cane ol Cast CyL 444 ^nn
IH199W8 NTXM16S5
Comimjitx - A— -7J980E-OT
B-3J2?6tMIl C*4£OOOE*
-------
bcott Specialty oases, inc.
1290 COMBERMERE STREET. TROY. MI 48083 (&10) 589-2350 FAX'(810) 589-2134
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
C AE INSTRUMENT RENTAL
246 WOODWORK LANE
PALATINE, IL 60067
Assay Laboratory
Scctr Specialty Gasea, Ine
1290 Cc '
Troy. MI 4*083
fertilise Order: 1332-71500
Scott Project #: 278931
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
This certification was performed IM outing ID EPA Tnofatritity Piutuud For Assay tod Cmifiarion of Gaseous
Citibnaoa Standards; Piwedmc GI; September, 1993.
Cylinder Number: ALM058692
Cylinder Pressure +•: 1900 psig
rYT.TNDER
Propane
• Balance Gu: Nitrogen
3/29/93
Prcrioiu CertifloitB Date: None
Certified
83.74 ppn
__ _. .._ . . ounre a bdow 130 psif.
•V^.*AaaNr]'Qj IUJVUAL* is inchtiivc of umJ ^uimn aror gore^ wfaidi a fag ndnda
Eipiratioa Date: 3V29/98
Anilyrtea| Uncertainty*
±1% NIST Directly Traceable
i of ihe meuuiuucot oroeeaseJ.
RETTRENCE STANDARD
Type Ezpiradoa Dtte
'SRM 2643A 3/28/98
INSTRUMENTATION
Instrument/Model/SeruU IV
Propane : Beckman/400/1002059
Cylinder Number
SX-20290
Last Date Calibrated
3/28/95
Concentration
99.12 ppm Propane in Nitrogen
Anilytical Principle
Flame looizarion Detector
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-Z*n» Cu R-RtfertBC* Gu T-Tat Cu r-CorreUtfoa Coefficient)
Compoaents
Propane
Pint Triad Aaalyiii Second Triad Analysis Calibration Curve
D«K*23ya5 RMPORMUMK m»
ZKOO Ri'taio Ti'taja
R2-9B.10 a^.00 12-8180
23*0.00 T3-43.7O R3^9-10
Ai9.CanvGTCial.Cvl B174 ppn
C^Mii*r»tto*'A-Ci-Ci'O^'C»
i-t.00000 SRM ZBOA
Canoro: A^aOM<21000
B~i.ooosooooa C*O.UXOOOODO
D^.000000000 E^OOQOOOOCO
Special Notes
Miil
Analyst
------- |