v»EPA
United States
Environmental Proloction
Agency
EPA 910-R-15-002
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regional Laboratory Network
Annual Report 2014
-------
Cover: Snapshot of environmental laboratory science themes of Protecting Water; Addressing Climate Change; Improving Air
Quality, Toxics and Chemical Safety, Communities; State, Tribal, and Local Partnerships; High-Performing Organization; and
Sustainable Future. Cover photos were obtained from EPA Office of Multimedia intranet site, except for two images listed below.
Photo: Water Lily
Photographer: Steve Donohue/EPA
Photo: Trees
Photographer: Randy Pomponio//EPA
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Table of Contents
Page
Executive Summary ii
Section I U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories/Regional Laboratory Network: An Overview 1
U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories 2
Regional Laboratory Network: An Overview 4
Section II Regional Laboratory Network Highlights 7
Protecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource 8
Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality 12
Taking Action on Toxics and Chemical Safety 14
Making a Visible Difference in Communities across the Country 16
Launching a New Era of State, Tribal, and Local Partnerships 18
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization 19
Working toward a Sustainable Future 23
Section III FY2014 Laboratory Accomplishment Results Summary 25
Section IV Regional Laboratories Capabilities Tables FY2014 29
Regional Laboratories Core Capabilities FY2014 30
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014 33
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014 43
Appendix A Acronyms/Abbreviations A-1
J
List of Illustrations
Figure
1. Analytical Support to EPA Programs in FY2014
2. FY2014 U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories Analyses Provided by Program
3. Projects/Sites Supported by Regional Laboratory Data FY2014 by Program Element
4. Method Development Project Support to EPA Programs in FY2014
Page
26
26
27
27
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Executive Summary
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA)
Regional Laboratories are state-of-the-art, full-service
environmental laboratories delivering analytical
services, field support, expert quality assurance and
data review, and innovative technical assistance.
Laboratory personnel are an integral part of the science
backbone of the Agency. Their skills and expertise
allow the development and implementation of solutions
to complex issues affecting human health and the
environment. Ten Regional Laboratories individually
support the 10 regions within the EPA while also
collaborating to form a highly effective Regional
Laboratory Network (RLN). This report highlights the
diversity of support and capabilities, all of which
reinforce EPA's mission and ongoing priorities.
In Fiscal Year 2014 (FY2014), Regional Laboratories
performed over 143,000 analyses in support towards
agency priorities and solving emerging environmental
issues. This analytical work supported activities related
to over 1,500 sites and projects associated with a wide
range of agency programs.
To effectively support the EPA Administrator's priorities
and themes, Regional Laboratories demonstrated their
responsiveness and flexibility by pioneering citizen
science programs to enhance sound science within
communities across the nation, researching the effects
of toxins on the natural environment and emerging
threats to human health, modifying methodologies to
meet the demand of lower risk levels or detection of
unknown threats, responding to emergencies, and
providing defensible data.
Real-time data continued to be an important tool for
environmental decision-making. Regional Laboratories
have a wide-range of field analytical support services
ranging from on-site analysis in mobile laboratories to
screening techniques performed directly in the field. In
FY2014, Regional Laboratories performed over 4,000
field analyses in support of a combination of 200
projects and sites throughout the country.
Accomplishments presented in this report capture only
a few of the overall activities provided by all Regional
Laboratories. These accomplishments underscore the
commitment of the RLN to be an integral part in
protecting human health and the environment.
FY2014 Annual Report Structure
Section I. U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories/
Regional Laboratory Network: An Overview
Provides introduction and overview of the Regional
Laboratory System. This section also contains
method development/research collaboration
information to enhance science.
Section II. Regional Laboratory Network
Highlights
Describes accomplishments of the Regional
Laboratories as they relate to EPA Administrator's
Themes.
Section III. FY2014 Laboratory Accomplishmer
Results Summary
Summarizes RLN common support services with
corresponding charts.
Section IV. Regional Laboratories Capabilities
Tables FY2014
Displays the abilities of Regional Laboratories to
conduct certain tests within chemistry, physical and
other determinations, and biology.
EPA Agency Themes
Meeting the Challenge Ahead
Protecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource
Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air
Quality
Taking Action on Toxics and Chemical Safety
Making a Visible Difference in Communities across
the Country
Launching a New Era of State, Tribal, and Local
Partnerships
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization
Working toward a Sustainable Future
I
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Section I U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories/Regional Laboratory
Network: An Overview
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories
Region 1: New England Regional Laboratory Investigation
& Analysis Branch
Ernest Waterman, Director
Waterman.Ernest@epa.gov
11 Technology Drive
N. Chelmsford, MA 01863-2431
Phone:617-918-8632
FAX: 617-918-8540
Region 2: Division of Environmental Science and
Assessment Laboratory Branch
John Bourbon, Director
bourbon.iohn@epa.gov
2890 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08837
Phone:732-321-6706
Fax:732-321-6165
Region 3: Environmental Science Center Laboratory Branch
Karen Costa, Manager
Costa.Karen@epa.gov
701 Mapes Road
Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350
Phone:410-305-2689
Fax:410-305-3095
Region 4: Analytical Support Branch
Danny France, Director
France.Danny@epa.gov
980 College Station Road
Athens, GA 30605-2720
Phone: 706-355-8551
Fax: 706-355-8803
Region 5: U.S. EPA Region 5 Laboratory, Chicago Regional
Laboratory
Dennis Wesolowski, Director
wesolowski.dennis@epa.gov
536 S. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60605
Phone:312-353-9084
Fax:312-886-2591
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories
Region 6: Environmental Services Branch
Wes McQuiddy, Director
Mcquiddv.David@epa.gov
10625 Fallstone Road
Houston, TX 77099
Phone:214-665-6722
Fax:281-983-2124
Region 7: Regional Science & Technology Center
Margie St. Germain, Director
Stgermain.margie@epa.gov
300 Minnesota Ave.
Kansas City, KS66101
Phone:913-551-5154
Fax:913-551-7873
Region 8: U.S. EPA Region 8 Laboratory
Mark Burkhardt, Director
Burkhardt.Mark@epa.gov
16194 West 45th Drive
Golden, CO 80403
Phone:303-312-7799
Fax:303-312-7800
Region 9: U.S. EPA Region 9 Laboratory
Duane James, Acting Director
James.Duane@epa.gov
1337S. 46th Street, Bldg. 201
Richmond, CA 94804-4698
Phone:510-412-2300
Fax:510-412-2302
Region 10: Manchester Environmental Laboratory
Barry Pepich, Director
Pepich.Barry@epa.gov
7411 Beach Drive East
Port Orchard, WA 98366
Phone:360-871-8701
Fax:360-871-8747
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratory Network: An Overview
EPA has 10 regional offices and each region has a laboratory. The
Regional Laboratories provide mission-critical support to the Agency,
protecting human health and the environment. Service and expertise
provided by each Regional Laboratory are tailored to meet the needs of
that particular region or program and to address complex and emerging
environmental issues. In addition to
supporting each region, the 10 Regional
Laboratories collaborate to form the
Regional Laboratory Network (RLN).
Efficiency, effectiveness, and flexibility are
maximized by using scientific expertise,
implementing and developing methods,
and maximizing partnerships within RLN
and across the nation.
Services tailored to meet
regional needs and to
address complex and
emerging environmental
issues
Environmental decisions and policies
provide the RLN with the analytical
structure to meet program needs.
Regional Laboratories also provide support
to national initiatives and research. Each
Support special project-
specific objectives and
goals towards a
sustainable future
laboratory within the RLN constantly and consistently meets and supports
project-specific objectives, achieves quality goals, provides analytical
expertise, and produces accurate data within the Agency.
Accreditation following
National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation
Conference (NELAC) or
International Standards
Organization (ISO) 17025
EPA Regional Laboratories are committed
to producing quality data. The laboratories
follow EPA organizational directives for a
high-performing organization. All 10
laboratories are accredited by National or
International Accreditation programs
ensuring effective quality systems,
improved performance, and defensible
data. External assessments are
performed regularly at RLN laboratories.
Contracting mechanisms are used within
the RLN to provide additional procurement
of analytical services. The Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) provides
standard analytical methods supporting the
Superfund Program. Each laboratory uses
an Environmental Services Assistance
Team (ESAT), which is a contract to support laboratory functions. This
organizational structure permits EPA Regional Laboratories to provide
quick response to emergencies, while providing timely completion of all
projects. During FY2014, 10 Regional Laboratories supported over
143,000 sample analyses and over 1,500 projects.
RLN supports Agency
quick responses to
emergencies
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratory Network: An Overview
Regional Laboratory scientists are a valuable resource. Scientists
have expertise in analytical methods, quality assurance and quality
control principles, data validation, field analytical techniques, and
solving complex analytical projects.
Support analytical During FY2014, the 10 Regional
method improvements Laboratories supported more than
125 method improvement projects.
Regional Laboratory scientists are certification officers for the Drinking
Water Laboratory Certification Program and participate in state
drinking water audit programs. Laboratory scientists also provide
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ management, technical, logistical, and
oversight support to EPA, State and
tribal programs, operate air monitoring
quality assurance programs, and
support field sampling functions.
Serve crucial roles in
regional drinking water
audit programs
EPA Regional Laboratories provided analytical responses to
approximately 15 significant emergency response events in FY2014.
EPA Regional Laboratories are capable of analyzing samples
suspected to contain a variety of chemical and biological compounds,
including chemical warfare agents.
Also, some Regional Laboratories
developed and validated new methods
for chemical warfare agent degradation
compounds that characterize and
remediate contaminated areas.
Respond to Homeland
Security events
Within each Regional Laboratory, core capabilities allow support to
various EPA programs. Unique capabilities provide the flexibility for
each laboratory to meet geographical environmental demands or
regional and national initiatives. Three tables (core, unique, and
developing) summarize chemical, physical and biological/
microbiological capabilities for each
region. The Core, Unique, and
Developing capabilities tables for each
Regional Laboratory are provided in
Section IV and are available on the
following EPA websites.
Core, Unique, and
Developing capabilities
span across RLN
Regional Laboratories Core Capabilities FY2014
http://www.epa.qov/aboutepa/reqional-science-and-technoloqy-lab-core-capabilities
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
http://www.epa.gov/regionallabs/epa-regional-laboratories-unique-analvtical-capabilities-and-documentation-region
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014
http://www.epa.gov/measurements/collection-methods
-------
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Section II Regional Laboratory Network Highlights
xvEPA
United States
Environmental Prelection
Agoncy
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Protecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource
Ensure drinking water is safe. Restore and maintain oceans, watersheds, and their
aquatic ecosystems to protect human health, support economic and recreational activities,
and provide healthy habitat for fish, plants, and wildlife.
Regional Laboratories play an important part in
protecting and restoring the nation's water
resources by providing:
key data for regions and their partners and
target actions to protect human health and
aquatic ecosystems more efficiently
technical and regulatory support to drinking
water laboratories and training and support for
water quality monitoring efforts
analytical support for various projects across
the U.S.
Drinking Water Laboratory Certification
Laboratories that analyze drinking water samples are
required to be certified by an approved certifying
authority. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Regional Laboratory personnel, trained certification
officers, conduct on-site evaluation of drinking water
laboratories operated by states and tribal communities.
Certification Officers also conduct audits of state's
certification programs to ensure all laboratories
analyzing drinking water samples are following
approved methods mandated by EPA's National
Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Ultimately, the
effort of the laboratory certification program ensures
drinking water is free from harmful contaminants. In
FY2014, Regional Laboratories performed 31
evaluations and 14 audits.
Regional Laboratories supported
water-related projects, including TMDL Studies
Water Quality Assessment and Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) Program Support
Crucial for management of our water resources, water
quality data are used to characterize waters, identify
trends, identify emerging problems, determine whether
pollution control programs are working, and help direct
pollution control efforts to where they are most needed.
A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a
pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet
water quality standards, and an allocation of that load
among the various sources of that pollutant. Regional
Laboratories provide substantial analytical support for
water quality assessments to, and TMDL development
for, water bodies throughout the country.
Methyl Mercury TMDL for San Francisco Bay Delta
Watershed
Region 9 Laboratory used its recently-developed
capability to support a study of methylmercury in the
San Francisco Bay Delta Watershed. As one of the
largest and most important estuarine systems on the
West Coast, the Bay Delta estuary is supplying
drinking water to 25 million people and irrigation water
for 4 million acres of farmland. Methylmercury, a
potent neurotoxin, poses a unique water management
challenge in the Bay Delta. After establishing a TMDL,
Region 9 Laboratory, in collaboration with a joint
project with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality
Control Board, analyzed multiple sets of water samples
from agricultural sites. The data provided will be used
to develop a more accurate baseline of methylmercury
loads associated with irrigated agriculture, thereby
refining TMDL levels.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
rotecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource
TMDL Studies in Springfield, Missouri
The Wilson, Jordan, and Pearson Creek TMDLs
were established January 2011 after named as
impaired waters from multiple-point sources and
urban nonpoint sources. The pollutant causing the
impairment is listed as unknown; however, toxicity
from multiple pollutants and changes in hydrology
from increased impervious surfaces are the
suspected cause of the impairment. By
establishing these TMDLs, EPA met the
milestones of the 2001 Consent Decree.
However, after a ruling in 2011, EPA was required
to further consider impacts based on additional
water quality. To meet a settlement agreement,
Region 7 conducted monthly water and sediment
sampling and diurnal dissolved oxygen monitoring.
Water grab samples were analyzed for total
phosphorus, total nitrogen, suspended solids,
dissolved solids, total solids, dissolved metals, and
hardness. Sediment grab samples consisted of
metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs). Water and sediment samples from urban
streams in Springfield were collected for over 10
different traditional methods, including metals,
poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, anions, hardness,
semi-volatile organics, and pH. This effort
supports EPA's interest in determining what
pollutants may be present and whether the creeks
meet Missouri water quality standards and
effectively restore these streams. The data will be
used to write pollutant-specific TMDLs for each
creek.
i
For more information:
(American Canoe Association, et al. v. EPA, No.
98-1195-CV-Win consolidation with No. 98-4282-
CV-W, February 27, 2001).
(City of Springfield vs. EPA, etal., (6:11-cv-03383)
Wilson, Jordon and Pearson Creeks).
Field Auditing for National Rivers and Streams
Assessment
Region 9 Laboratory provided field auditing support for
the National Rivers and Streams Assessment (NRSA)
2013-2014. The national survey is designed to estimate
the percentage of rivers and streams in good, fair, or
poor condition, help citizens and water quality managers
evaluate the effectiveness of protection and restoration
efforts, and take action to prevent pollution. Trained
sampling crews, consisting of representatives from
states, tribes, interstate agencies, and private contracts
collected samples at 1,800 sites across the country
using the same methods at each site. Sampling crews
took numerous measurements, including:
temperature, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, pH, and
more
habitat condition along river or stream banks
algae and free-floating plants
benthic macroinvertebrates - small aquatic animals:
insects, snails, and crayfish (a source of food for fish)
bacteria indicators of possible fecal contamination
type and abundance offish
contaminants in fish tissue.
I
Regional Laboratories supported
HHi
Oversight- or Enforcement-related activities
Environmental Studies for Ocean-Dredged Material
Management of dredged material and Ocean-Dredged
Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) is a shared
responsibility of EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) under the Clean Water Act (CWA)
and Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act
(MPRSA). Each year, USAGE Portland District
(CENWP) dredges 3-to-5 million cubic yards of
sediment at the Mouth of the Columbia River (MCR) to
maintain the 6-mile long, deep-draft, navigation
entrance channel. MCR-dredged material is placed at
two EPA-designated ODMDS locations. In 2014,
Region 10 Laboratory participated in studies designed
to assess the status of the physical, chemical, and
biological environment on benthos within previous,
current, and future drop zones.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Protecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource
Effectiveness of Storm Water Best Management
Practice (BMP) Evaluated
Since its establishment, EPA made it a goal to adhere
to BMPs to protect the quality of water and soil.
Following BMP guidelines is particularly important when
managing the impacts of nutrient loading that builds
within storm water runoff and enters receiving waters.
With constantly advancing technology, EPA must
respond to changing times and create new ways to
continue protecting the environment in the most efficient
way possible. To ensure the most current standards,
Region 1 Laboratory partnered with the regional water
program and two municipalities on a study to evaluate
effectiveness of regional storm water BMPs. Partners
conducted a project to monitor and evaluate the BMPs
that will continue for a minimum of 2 years. The
ultimate goal of this project is to determine the most
effective and practical set of BMP guidelines to reduce
nutrient loads flowing into receiving waters.
For this project, groups worked together to:
1. Identify key water constituents to be analyzed by
Region 1 Laboratory and establish general water
quality parameters to asses performance of BMPs
in treating storm water.
2. Develop a basic Quality Assurance Project Plan
(QAPP) for use during BMP construction phases.
The QAPP will be used to test sample access
methods and storm water content. Afterwards, a
second, more-comprehensive QAPP will be
implemented to carry sampling and analysis of BMP
performances from post-installation through a
minimum of 20 rain events and meeting project data
quality objectives.
3. Develop performance rating curves for each BMP
and create a set of efficient and cost-effective BMP
guidelines.
The top BMP arrangements chosen will be extremely
valuable in improving EPA's storm water management.
The BMPs selected are expected to help with concerns,
such as mitigating the costs of development and
implementation. The resulting impact of BMP
guidelines will be widespread.
Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products
fPPCP) from Hospital Discharges
Region 2 Laboratory coordinated a 4-month
collaborative study to characterize PPCP in hospital
effluent and sewage treatment plant (STP) influent/
effluent. The study involved six hospitals discharging
into four STPs in Suffolk County, New York. Suffolk
County field personnel collected the samples from the
six hospitals and four STPs. Region 2 Laboratory, in
collaboration with Region 8 Laboratory, conducted
PPCP analysis of 72 samples, providing results for 206
compounds. Results were used by the Division of
Enforcement and Compliance Assistance (DECA) in
June 2014.
Regional Laboratories
All
provide scientific expertise to support
Regional and National Water Programs and
Initiatives, which can include analysis, field
support, quality assurance and data review,
and technical support.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Protecting Water: A Precious, Limited Resource
Cvanobacteria Monitoring & Bloom Watch Pilot
Program
Cyanobacteria and their associated toxins are of
particular concern to humans and the ecology.
Increasing precipitation and land development affects
nutrient loads to aquatic systems. Impacted water
systems are shut down when cyanotoxins are in the
water supply. Ingestion of these algal toxins affects
people, animals, wildlife, and pets.
In New England, regional shifts in monitoring efforts
highlighted varying cyanobacteria concentrations and
toxicity levels. However, different sampling approaches
and methodology inconsistencies made it extremely
difficult to aggregate data, understand algae
characteristics and behavior, and share information
across the region.
In 2012, the Region 1 Laboratory convened a region-
wide (including New York) cyanobacteria monitoring
and "bloom watch" workgroup to ensure uniform
consistency with cyanobacteria monitoring methods and
protocols. The workgroup consisted of state
environmental water quality and beach monitoring
programs, departments of public health, tribes, public
water suppliers, Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs), citizen monitoring groups, and academia. In
May 2014, the workgroup established a pilot monitoring
project, which included an algal taxonomic identification
(ID) workshop, methods training, and instrument
calibration protocols. Sampling commenced in June
2014 in all New England states.
Three principal monitoring components: were
established: in-lake monitoring, shore-side monitoring,
and a qualitative "bloom watch" component. In-lake
monitoring consisted of a minimum of three sampling
sites with collection of an integrated water sample, a
cross-section from the surface to 3 meters at each site
and a filtrate sample. Shore-side monitoring consisted
of a minimum of one sample, a 1-meter integrated
sample and one filtrate sample. The site locations
remain consistent; additional sites can be added at the
discretion of the sampler.
Protocols allow samples to be analyzed on-site using a
handheld fluorimeterto measure chlorophyll and
phycocyanin, or frozen to be analyzed at a debriefing
session. Fluorimeters were provided to the New
England states through the Region 1 Water Monitoring
Equipment Loan Program. The "bloom watch"
component established protocols to document time and
location of a perceived algal bloom and track the
frequency and spatial occurrence in the region. Site
photos, can be enhanced at microscopic levels for algal
identification purposes. A demonstration was provided
showing how a smartphone can mimic an inexpensive
field microscope.
Smartphone apps have been developed and are being
tested. A regional geo-referenced database capable of
providing "vulnerability assessment" of a waterbody
based on hydro geomorphic characteristics and land
use patterns in the watershed is also being tested.
Upon project completion, the workgroup will evaluate
their progress, refine the approach, make
recommendations, and develop a monitoring program.
Capability to analyze
water samples
for over
EPA and other
standardized methods
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality
Protect and improve the air so it is healthy to breathe and risks to human health
and the environment are reduced. Reduce greenhouse gas intensity by
enhancing partnerships with businesses and other sectors and common-sense
regulatory initiatives.
Regional Laboratories actively support the
objectives of the Agency's air goals through a
variety of activities. These activities include:
technical support and training
air monitoring and air monitoring quality
assurance
laboratory support for various air toxics
assessments
laboratory support for numerous other local
projects that address specific community risks
and method development.
Sorbent Tube Analysis of Routine Air Samples
Provide Cost-Effective Alternative
Typically, air samples for volatile organics are collected
in Summa canisters following Method TO-15 from the
EPA Compendium of Methods for the Determination of
Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air. Region 7
developed an enhanced method using sorbent tubes
similar to Method TO-17. A three-phased sorbent tube
that collects air samples of low to moderate humidity
was field-tested at three different sites. Results were
comparable to Method TO-15 and met Method TO-17
requirements. Future method development includes
validating a single-phase sorbent tube that will also
produce good results in high humidity.
(Q) Regional Laboratories
have the capability to analyze for
Organic Compounds in Air
Vapor Intrusion Study in West Virginia
Vapor intrusion occurs when volatile chemicals migrate
from contaminated groundwater or soils into an
overlying building in ways similar to that of radon gas
seeping into homes. When remediating a contaminated
site, analysis of indoor air may be required to assess
presence of vapor intrusion. Typically, EPA Method
TO-15 using air canisters is employed to measure level
of possible contamination.
In 2014, an extensive vapor intrusion sampling event
was conducted at a West Virginia remedial site to
determine if a new vapor plume emanated from an
underlying tetrachloroethylene (PCE) plume. The study
was designed to assess impacts to local residents living
above the plume and Region 3 Laboratory provided air
analysis on these samples.
Pictured above is an air canister used for volatile
organic analysis of air samples.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality
PM 2.5 Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)
The goal of the PEP is to evaluate total
measurement system bias of the particulate
matter (PM) 2.5 monitoring network. The
laboratory component of the program includes
PM filter handling, inspection, equilibration, and
weighing; data entry, validation, management,
and distribution to client regions; and filter
archival and data submittal to the Air Quality
System (AQS). The PM filter weighing laboratory
is located at Region 4. Other Regional
Laboratories also provided support for PEP
through performance evaluation audits, quality
I assurance collocations, and PEP audits.
Regional Laboratory staff provided training
classes for the PM 2.5 PEP program.
Ambient Air Audits at A/Core Stations
NCore is a national multi-pollutant network that
integrates several advanced measurement systems for
particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. NCore air
monitoring sites operate trace-level instruments that are
difficult to audit with conventional through-the-probe air
monitoring equipment.
Region 2 developed a standard operating procedure
(SOP), used nationally, for conducting these audits, and
has identified inaccuracies and potential sources of
error. Currently, the region is assessing the scope and
magnitude of errors/inaccuracies in existing procedures
and methods, and is testing alternative calibration and/
or analytical strategies for NCore audits.
PM 2.5 audits
conducted in FY2014
Air Quality Monitoring Requires Extensive Analysis
In Pennsylvania, a proposed natural gas production
project was identified to measure baseline air quality.
The proposed plan outlined locations to conduct
ambient air sampling for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). The monitoring project was part of the State
and Local Agency Monitoring Stations (SLAMS), which
consists of a network of monitoring stations. Size and
distribution is determined by the needs of state and
local air pollution control agencies to meet their
respective state implementation plan (SIP)
requirements. The primary purpose of air monitoring is
to determine if concentrations of certain VOCs can be
shown to statistically correlate to gas exploration and
production activities. Air samples were collected for a
period of up to 18 months and will continue the following
year after gas exploration begins. Sampling began in
February 2014 and analysis was conducted by the
Region 3 Laboratory using EPA Method TO-15.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Taking Action on Toxics and Chemical Safety
Keeping communities safe and healthy by reducing risks associated with exposure to
chemicals in commerce, indoor and outdoor environments, and products and food.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), or
Superfund, and the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) provide the legal basis for
EPA's efforts to preserve and restore land using
the most effective waste management and cleanup
methods available. By supporting these programs,
the Regional Laboratories:
Analyze hazardous and non-hazardous waste
Implement applied research and method
development to meet evolving analytical
needs of Superfund and RCRA programs
Ensure vigilant readiness for emergency
response to environmental disasters,
hazardous materials releases, time-critical
removals, and inland oil spills.
Perfluorinated Chemicals fPFCs) Method Evaluated
for Wastewater and Solid Matrices
PFCs are an ongoing concern for EPA. Products
manufactured and treated with PFCs include clothing,
fabrics, surface treatments, cleansers, and cookware,
which enter the environment via down-the-drain
disposal. Other PFC products are directly discharged
into the environment from fire-fighting foams and
surface treatments. Region 5 Laboratory participated in
preliminary semi-continuous activated sludge (SCAS)
experiments and evaluated other PFC tests. An
analytical method to measure PFCs in wastewater and
solid matrices was developed and accepted by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM),
analyzing PFCs for SCAS study by an approved
method.
Trichloroethvlene (TCE) Impacts Investigated in
Meramec Caverns
The topography of southeastern Missouri is
characterized by numerous caves, sinkholes, fissures,
and underground streams. Meramec Caverns is one of
the largest cave systems in Missouri. Unfortunately, it is
impacted by a subsurface plume of TCE that originates
from a site approximately 5 miles away.
Concerns were raised about TCE exposures to visitors
and employees touring the commercialized portion of
Meramec Caverns and the ecological health of cave-
dwelling fauna.
Using Region 7 mobile laboratory, on-site TCE
concentrations in both commercialized and native
portions of Meramec Caverns were analyzed by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) on
samples of cave air using portable bag samplers. The
data generated characterized distribution,
concentration, and ventilation of TCE throughout the
cave complex. This project is continuing into FY2015.
)f Regional Laboratory
analyses support Superfund program
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Taking Action on Toxics and Chemical Safety
Ongoing Monitoring at Wvckoff/Eagle Harbor
Superfund Site
The Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor Superfund site is located on
the east side of Bainbridge Island in Central Puget
Sound, Washington. The East Harbor Operable Unit
(OU) 01 consists of more than 70 acres of intertidal and
subtidal habitats contaminated by releases of creosote
and other wood-treating chemicals from a now defunct
wood-treating plant. The releases contaminated bottom
sediments of Eagle Harbor with PAHs. In 1994-1995,
EPA capped more than 50 acres of the harbor, placing
a 3-foot thick layer of clean dredged sand on top of the
contaminated sediments. Creosote seeps still occur on
the beaches. To ensure the capped areas of the site
continue to protect human health and the environment,
EPA monitors contaminant concentrations in sediments,
pore-water, and clam tissue collected from the beaches.
Eagle Harbor is within the Suquamish tribe fishing area.
The Suquamish tribe retains the right to harvest fish and
marine invertebrates and have their fishery resource
habitat areas protected.
Region 10 Laboratory provided analytical support for
treatment plant and monitoring events for more than 20
years. In 2014 about 20 clam composite samples were
collected as part of a monitoring event. Region 10
developed a specialized method for preparing clam
tissues for analysis called QuEChERS (Quick, Easy,
Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe). Lower sensitivity was
obtained using GC/MS/secondary ion mass
spectrometry (SIMS). Results were used to determine if
shellfish are suitable for harvest.
Response to Chemical Spill
A chemical spill occurred on an Ohio River tributary,
which lead to a Superfund emergency response. The
On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) in charge of operations
requested Region 5 Laboratory assistance with analysis
of the chemical in the water. The chemical,
(Tri-n-butyl)-n-tetradecylphosphoniumchloride,
abbreviated TTPC, was detectable by liquid
chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). A
method was quickly developed and put to use within a
month of the spill. Over 100 water samples have been
analyzed to date to aid in the response effort.
Over l2)nl
if
R
analyses conducted by
egional Laboratories for Emergency Response
activities
Spill Response in West Virginia
In January 2014, the chemical
4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCHM) spilled in the
Elk River in Charleston, West Virginia. The spilled
chemical, used in coal preparation and processing,
caused a drinking water advisory affecting
approximately 300,000 people in nine counties. Other
chemicals, such as polyglycol ethers (PPH), were later
identified as part of the release.
Region 3 Laboratory identified analytical techniques for
MCHM and PPH in water, striving to meet health
advisory levels to ensure the reliability of analytical
methods used by public utilities and other organizations.
Both GC/MS and high performance liquid
chromatography/ultraviolet spectroscopy (HPLC/UV)
were used along with other techniques to fully
characterize the spilled material.
Quick Analysis and Delivery of Results for
Ringwood Mines Superfund Site Removal Response
Region 2 Laboratory provided analytical support to the
Ringwood Mines Superfund Site. The site was re-
opened due to additional contamination found in
residential areas originally deemed safe. The laboratory
analyzed over 600 soil samples over a 6-month period,
primarily for lead, in support of removal program
activities at key residences. The laboratory provided
validated results within 20 to 36 hours of each sample
delivery.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Making a Visible Difference in Communities across the Country
community-based activities to provide seamless assistance to communities, both urban
and rural, while maximizing efficiency and results. Expand support of community efforts to
build healthy, sustainable, green neighborhoods and reduce and prevent harmful exposures
and health risks to children and underserved, overburdened communities.
Environmental and public health impacts affect
people most significantly where they live - at the
community level. EPA is focused on providing
better support to communities, especially in
environmentally-overburdened, underserved, and
economically-distressed areas where the needs are
greatest.
Regional Laboratories coordinate technical
assistance and other resources across EPA
Programs; with states, tribes, and local
governments; and with other federal agencies to
support communities as they pursue environmental
improvements that enhance economic opportunity
and quality of life.
Air Sampling and Analysis from Southeast Chicago
In response to air quality concerns in the Upper
Midwest, Region 5 Laboratory actively monitored
outdoor air pollutants and toxins. In investigating
petroleum coke (petcoke) piles, the source of coal-like
dust particles in the air, Region 5 scientists analyzed
filters and collected soil and wipe samples from
residences in southeast Chicago to determine whether
air quality was impacting the health of homes. Petcoke
piles have been a major concern in both Detroit and
Chicago due to their recent storage in both cities.
Samples were taken directly from the petcoke piles,
analyzed, and compared with those taken from
residential locations. The comparisons indicated a
direct correlation to materials stored on-site at the
refineries suggesting the piles were the source of
contamination found in the residences. The findings
resulted in capping and eventual removal of petcoke
material from outside storage areas. This victory for
human health is expected to protect many individuals
from the impacts of poor air quality.
Dye Study near Bridgeport, Connecticut
Region 1 Laboratory scientists conducted two dye
dilution studies on the Lower Housatonic River in
Connecticut over a 2-week period in May 2014. EPA
assisted in designing and conducting a dye study for the
Stratford Water Pollution Control Facility and a second
study at the Milford Housatonic Wastewater Treatment
Plant, with discharges into the Housatonic River. Data
have been used to help Connecticut and the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine the extent
to which treatment plants impact the Housatonic River
and areas in the Long Island Sound. The study has
also helped evaluate existing shellfish closure areas
and determine whether they need to be modified.
The Region 1 team designed the monitoring portion of
the study and conducted nearfield tracking of dye
concentrations around the outfalls. EPA staff also
handled boat operations and tracked real-time
concentrations of dye at fixed stations in transects
throughout the estuary and into Long Island Sound.
These studies involved long days of tracking dye on
EPA boats to coincide with tides requiring staff to be on
location in Connecticut for 2 weeks. The complexity of
this study was due to the logistics of injecting dye at two
plants, the vast extent of the study area, rough seas at
times, and substantial media presence.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Making a Visible Difference in Communities across the Country
Achieving Lower Detection Limits of Pesticides
in Impaired Waters near City of Birmingham
The city of Birmingham, Alabama and the Alabama
Department of Environmental Management
(ADEM) sought to remove Village Creek from the
State's list of impaired waters. In accordance with
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, two
sections of Village Creek have previously been
identified as impaired due to the presence of the
legacy pesticide dieldrin, which has been banned
since 1987. Since the existing detection limit was
higher than the human health criteria for dieldrin,
Region 4 Laboratory improved the method by
using a smaller extraction volume yielding a 100-
fold decrease in detection limit. Hence, future
sample results met the lower human health criteria
and will determine potential delisting of the two
sections of Village Creek.
Over
samples analyzed in FY2014 supporting EPA's
Brownfields Program, which is designed to
empower states, communities, and other
stakeholders to redevelop abandoned industrial
and commercial properties with potential
contamination.
Lead in Schools Initiative
Several Regional Laboratories assisted Region 2 with
the analysis of water samples from multiple schools and
daycare centers for the Lead-in-Schools Initiative.
Inductively-coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/
MS) was used for sample analysis. Regions
participating included Region 2, Region 5, Region 6,
Region 7, Region 9, and Region 10.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Launching a New Era of State, Tribal, and Local Partnerships
Strengthen partnerships with states, tribes, local governments, and global communities
central to the success of the national environmental protection program through consultation,
collaboration, and shared accountability.
By providing support at the regional level,
opportunities abound to work in concert with
states, tribes, and local entities in providing
technical support. Types of activities where
Regional Laboratories become involved include:
Analytical support to states or tribes
Assisting communities and volunteer monitoring
groups with implementation of Citizen Science
Providing training and technical support,
including training in preparation of QAPPs.
River and Stream Assessment for Wisconsin
Region 5 provided assistance to the State of Wisconsin
during the statewide river and stream sediment
assessment. Region 5 Laboratory analyzed over 100
sediment samples for 10 different chemical tests,
including both inorganic and organic analyses over a
3-year period. This effort was initiated to complete an
assessment of the health of rivers and streams
throughout the state.
Training for New England Tribes
Region 1 Laboratory organized and hosted a 2-day
statistics training course in 2014 for about 20 New
England environmental tribal staff. The course focused
on the use of statistics for analyzing water quality data,
with a focus on using "R," an open-source statistical
program.
Citizen Science becomes Reality
One of Region 2 program goals is to raise the visibility
level of citizen science in the region, support the
formation of citizen science groups, and provide
technical guidance and assistance to improve data
quality of monitoring efforts. The citizen science pilot
project in the New York-New Jersey Harbor serves as a
blueprint for future citizen science efforts, which
connected EPA scientists with citizens trained to collect
and analyze water quality data, increasing knowledge
about pathogen contamination of the harbor. Region 2
helped develop a "tool kit" for water quality monitoring.
The components of the "tool kit" include:
1) QAPP template for planning monitoring projects
2) Field and laboratory datasheets to record
observations/results and method information
3) SOPs for common water quality measurements
4) YouTube videos on sample collection procedures
5) Equipment loan program to provide critical
monitoring equipment for collecting environmental
data.
Application and use of the region's citizen science "tool
kit" was successfully tested during the pilot by four
citizen science groups. The tools will be refined and
made available on a formal equipment loan program in
FY2015 for future citizen science groups, with an
emphasis on Environmental Justice areas.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization
Maintain and attract EPA's diverse and engaged workforce of the future with a more
collaborative work environment. Modernize our business practices, taking advantage of
new tools and technologies, and improve the way we work as a high-performing Agency.
One of the most important regional and state
laboratory partnerships is sharing unique expertise,
when needed. In 2014, Regional Laboratories
supported various projects. Laboratories relied on
the expertise of other Regional Laboratories with
unique capability/capacity.
Collaboration with the Office of Research and
Development (ORD) provided opportunities for
scientists to expand their knowledge and skills
through the Regional Research and Partnership
Program.
Increased Collaboration Tools
Region 1 Laboratory developed a Regional Monitoring
Network (RMN) to determine the condition of, and
changes in, high-quality reference streams in New York
and New England to climate change and other stressors
on water temperature, flow, and macroinvertebrate
communities. RMN is being duplicated at other EPA
regions in the northeast, in close collaboration with
other agencies and groups collecting similar data.
Centralized data repositories and protocols are in
development, through efforts of the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS), EPA, and others (for example:
htto://wim. usqs. gov/NorEaSTA.
Cost Savings for Air Sampling
Using sorbent tubes, Region 7 scientists saved
tremendous time and expense. Historically, air samples
were collected in Summa canisters and followed a
procedure delineated in the Compendium of Methods
for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in
Ambient Air, Method TO-15. The Summa canisters
were, and are currently, in limited supply due to high
costs, costing thousands of dollars per canister. To
purchase the canisters and manage rotating inventory
advance planning is required.
Region 7 developed a three-phased sorbent tube that
realizes significant savings since the cost of tubes are
significantly lower than canisters and tubes can be
reused 100 times. Shipping costs for the tubes are also
much lower.
Laboratory Technical Information Group (LTIG):
Enhancing Technical Knowledge of Laboratory
Scientists
In May 2014, LTIG held their 16th Annual
Conference for laboratory scientists. LTIG,
organized in 1998, invites laboratory scientists
from all EPA Laboratories, communicating
regularly through monthly conference calls and
conducting annual conferences. LTIG's goal is to
create a forum for technical discussion where
chemists from all 10 Regional Laboratories and
other EPA offices can communicate and
exchange ideas on analytical procedures and
problems.
'J Regional Scientists worked with ORD under
the Regional Research Partnership Program
(R2P2) - a program to enhance collaboration
and share knowledge between ORD and the
Regions
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization
Reduce Solvent Use by Testing New Technology
Region 7 chemists collaborated with multiple partners to
provide analytical data on two different solid-phase
extraction (SPE) products in response to recent Clean
Water Methods update.
Chemists have been working a new sorbent-coated stir
bar technology (Twister) in the analysis of urban stream
water monitoring for four years. A method for semi-
volatile analytes, which
included personal care
products and pesticides,
was developed and
results presented.
Chemists also worked
with the Office of Water
providing comments on
method revisions for EPA
Methods 608, 624, and
625 resulting in the final
publication, which closed
May 2015.
Region 7 chemists began working with the Independent
Laboratories Institute (III) of the American Council of
Independent Laboratories (ACIL) and meeting with
Horizon Technologies to test the SPE technology with
Horizon equipment. Ill was tasked with coordinating
large projects to benefit all laboratories and vendors.
The first major project, a multi-laboratory study, was
determined the feasibility of using SPE techniques using
EPA water methods with the Office of Water as the
ultimate customer, designed to produce the data quality
required by alternate test procedures. Vendors had to
identify at least three
laboratories,
including one of their
own, to participate in
this study, which
included 25
laboratories from
industry, government,
and academia.
Region 7 chemists participated in two phases of the
project, using stir bar technology and Horizon SPE
products. Electronic results were provided to an
anonymous sample vendor who consolidated the data
and performed statistical analysis. The results of the
study proved that the SPE technique was a viable
candidate to replace the traditional separatory funnel
extraction.
The ultimate benefit to the Agency is the flexibility to use
newer technology that significantly reduces the use of
hazardous solvents and the resulting hazardous waste.
Once the method revisions are approved, new
extraction methods will be allowed for enforcement of
the CWA with an eye on green chemistry.
Method Enhancement or Development
Projects
completed in FY2014
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organizatio
Regional Laboratories Support ORD
Hydraulic Fracturing Study
Regional Laboratories coordinated with EPA's
ORD on a 2-year research project directed by U.S.
Congress to study the relationship between
hydraulic fracturing and drinking water resources.
Natural gas plays a key role in the future of our
nation's clean energy. Recent advances in drilling
technologiesincluding horizontal drilling and
hydraulic fracturinghave made vast reserves of
natural gas economically recoverable in the U.S.
Responsible development of America's oil and gas
resources offers important economic, energy,
security and environmental benefits.
Hydraulic fracturing is a well-stimulation technique
used to maximize production of oil and natural gas
in unconventional reservoirs, such as shale, coal
beds, and tight sands. During hydraulic fracturing,
specially-engineered fluids containing chemical
additives are pumped under high pressure into the
well to create and hold open fractures in the
formation. These fractures increase the exposed
surface area of the rock in the formation and
stimulate the flow of natural gas or oil to the
wellbore. The use of hydraulic fracturing concerns
have increased due to potential environmental and
potential risks to drinking water.
Region 3 and Region 7 Laboratories provided
chemical analysis and field support forsemi-
volatiles, diesel-range organics, gasoline-range
organics, glycols and other unknown
identifications.
Mercury at Trask Forest
Land use is a critical parameter controlling
environmental mercury (Hg) cycling. Factors that
influence the mobility (for example, water flow, sediment
mobilization), bioavailability of inorganic mercury
(particulate-versus-filtered fractions), and other
variables associated with methyl mercury production
(for example, sulfate, organic carbon) are distinctly
associated with numerous land-use practices that may
allow management actions to influence bioaccumulation
in aquatic habitats. Methylmercury (MeHg), which is
produced by anoxic bacteria, primarily sulfate-reducing
bacteria (SRB), is the more toxic and bioaccumulative
form of Hg. Timber harvesting is a widespread land-use
activity in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). There are
approximately 60,000 square miles of harvestable
forestland in PNW, which accounts for nearly 25 percent
of the region's total land area. Thus, Hg distribution,
cycling, and bioaccumulation in PNW may be strongly
influenced by the magnitude and scale of regional
timber activities.
Region 10 has been collaborating with USGS since
2013 to study the effects of logging practices on
mercury processing and transport in Oregon's Trask
River watershed. Region 10 Laboratory supported the
research with MeHg and ultra-low-level Hg analyses
(519 analyses total) of surface waters collected to study
the effects of different harvesting techniques, such as
clearcutting and selective harvesting. The analyses
were challenging due to complexities of the MeHg
method and the need to maintain a pristine laboratory
environment to accurately measure to very low levels in
samples. One preliminary conclusion is that dissolved
mercury transports out of watersheds that were clear-
cut is significantly greater than watersheds that have not
been harvested. The remaining analysis is to evaluate
changes in mercury loading from the watersheds. Once
this work is complete, the study will be published in a
peer-reviewed journal by USGS and EPA.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization
Preserving Land at Longhorn Army Ammunitions
Site
To assist with the analysis of related samples at the
Longhorn Army Ammunitions site, Region 6 Laboratory
developed a method for analyzing all six dinitrotoluene
(DNT) isomers. These chemicals were suspected to be
breakdown products from munitions stored on base. An
analytical procedure using a gas chromatograph-triple
quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC/MS/MS) was
developed to successfully validate extractions down to
20 parts per trillion.
Development of Dissolved Gases or Light
Hydrocarbon Method
Region 6 coordinated a three-laboratory round robin
method and analysis study for light hydrocarbons
(LHCs) in water by gas chromatography/flame ionization
detector (GC/FID). Region 6 Laboratory, an instrument
vendor, and a state laboratory exchanged samples and
coordinated instrument conditions over a 1-week
period. The results were statistically analyzed for
precision and accuracy parameters. Currently, no
official EPA method for this analysis; however,
Regions 5, 6, and the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER)/Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) have a pending
proposal to further develop this effort into an official
EPA method.
New Method to Measure Lower Levels of Lead in
Soils
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) observed
continued health effects in people due to lead in their
blood even though presence of lead at historical
remediation sites were well below the action levels
needed to protect human health. Socioeconomically
disadvantaged children are particularly susceptible to
health effects due to the persistence of lead bound to
small particulate matter in their environment and the
tendency for children to put "dirty" hands to their mouth.
Therefore, EPA is reevaluating the action level for lead
in soils. In anticipation of the need to detect lead in
soils at lower concentrations, Region 4 Laboratory is
developing a new method for preparing soil samples.
The new method focuses on soils most likely to affect
at-risk human subjects. This method comprises sieving
the raw sample to a particular particle size and
extracting the lead using the human amino acid, glycine,
to mimic effects of digestion. Historical studies will be
repeated with the new methodology to evaluate site
compliance with the new action level for lead.
Field Analyses conducted in 2014
Almost double from 2013
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Working toward a Sustainable Future
Vance sustainable environmental outcomes and optimize economic and social outcomes
through Agency decisions and actions, which include expanding
conversation on environmentalism and engaging a broad range of stakeholders.
Regional Laboratories continue to explore
opportunities to reduce chemical usage or improve
processes.
Reducing Solvents for EPA Methods 608 and 625
Region 7 chemists developed several solid-phase
extraction methods that reduce solvent usage while
maintaining or improving detection limits. In FY2014,
extensive method development was culminated as a
partnership with two different vendors and the ACIL.
Region 7 was one of 25 laboratories participating in a
two-phase study, which provided technical response to
the comment period for the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) update of EPA Methods 608
and 625.
Supporting Enforcement Actions related to Ozone-
Depleting Compounds
Many people often take for granted the chemical safety
of their home appliances. Particularly, chemicals that
may come in contact with food or the air we breathe.
This year, the Criminal Investigation Division (CID)
requested Region 6 Laboratory to assist in an air
refrigerant purity investigation, by analyzing samples of
pressure cylinders or containers used to hold gases at a
pressure greater than that of the atmosphere,
containing an air conditioning refrigerant.
R-22, a non-flammable, ozone-depleting compound,
was listed as the main refrigerant; however, other
chemicals are suspected to be present in these
cylinders.
R-22 is currently being phased out in products used for
domestic consumption under the Montreal Protocol
Provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The limited
remaining amounts of R-22 have resulted in
replacement refrigerants being sold at lower costs.
However, these substitutes may be mixtures containing
other flammable and dangerous compounds, such as
propane and butane mixtures that can damage the
refrigerator's air conditioning system. Explosions and
fires have been reported when such alternative
refrigerants are used, making them extremely
dangerous to both animals and humans.
Region 6 Laboratory developed a new technique for
transferring the cylinder contents to the instrument. As
suspected, none of the samples analyzed contained
R-22 above the reporting limit. However, propane, a
hydrocarbon and flammable refrigerant was discovered.
Hydrocarbon refrigerants pose a particular hazard,
especially when they are stored in containers that are
not properly labeled. Analytical support provided by
Region 6 Laboratory helped ensure the container
contents are used with the necessary precautions; thus,
reducing the potential of injury to those that use the
refrigerant cylinders.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Section III FY2014 Laboratory Accomplishment Results Summary
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
FY2014 Laboratory Accomplishment Results Summary
This section summarizes a
number of the common support
services provided by the RLN.
Because of the unique nature of
the support provided by Regional
Laboratories, the ideal Regional
Laboratory scientist is one part
research scientist and one part
production scientist. Regional
Laboratory scientists are capable
of developing methods (often
with short lead times), focusing
on quality control, and operating
under demanding delivery
schedules.
Regional Laboratory staff
support diverse and challenging
requests. During FY2014, RLN
supported more than 143,000
analyses. The distribution of
work by the RLN is shown in
Figures 1 and 2. These totals
exclude Quality Control (QC)
samples, which add an
additional 20%.
Figure 1. Analytical Support to EPA Programs in FY2014
(143,234 Total Analyses)
Emergency Response
5.4%.
Figure 2. FY2014 U.S. EPA Regional Laboratories Analyses Provided by Program
(143,234 Total Analyses)
90000
82428
7764 7722
1638 1613
706 71 52
In keeping with prior years,
Superfund program continues to be
the largest volume requestor of
analytical services (57.5%),
followed by Water Programs
(28.2%). Emergency Response
program support continues to be
significant at 5.4%, with RLN
laboratories analyzing 7,722
samples in conjunction with time-
critical responses to environmental
disasters, hazardous materials
releases, priority contaminant
removals, and other threats to
human health and/or the
environment, which aided in timely
and cost-effective decision-making
in the field. All 10 Regional
Laboratories augmented the
National Enforcement Investigations
Center's (NEIC's) capacity in
support of important criminal cases,
analyzing 424 criminal samples
during the year.
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
FY2014 Laboratory Accomplishment Results Summary
Figure 3 summarizes the number of analytical projects supported by RLN according to EPA program element.
Collectively, RLN supported 1,474 projects.
Figures. Projects/Sites Supported by Regional Laboratory Data FY2014 by Program Element
(1 ,474 Total Sites/Projects Supported)
Water- Program Implementation (REMAP, TMDLF TOXNET, etc.) ^^^^_
Water- Enforcement
Water - Drinking Water Compliance and Emergencies J
1 160
J 115
92
Superfund -Removal ( 72
Other » fl 48
Superfund -Emergency Response j 37
Air- Program Implementation (monitoring, permits, etc.) .j) 32
Criminal Investigation _i 24
RCRA - Enforcement Lj 18
RCRA- Corrective Action J 15
LUST J 13
TSCA- Remedial J 11
Brownfields J 10
TSCA - Enforcement | 5
Pesticides | 4
Air -Enforcement 2
592
A significant amount of
work supported during the
year required methods be
developed specifically to
address the unique needs
of a particular region
(Figure 4). Often,
methods developed by a
region to address a local
environmental challenge
are mobilized in other
regions as their benefit is
realized and/or as the
need arises.
Figure 4. Method Development Project Support to EPA Programs in FY2014
(125 Methods)
eslicide'
1.6%
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Section IV Regional Laboratories Capabilities Tables FY2014
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Core Capabilities FY2014
I. Chemistry
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Acidity
Alkalinity
Asbestos
Anions
Chromium, Hexavalent (Cr+6)
Cyanide, Amenable
Cyanide, Total
Fluoride
Hardness
Mercury, Total
Mercury (TCLP)
Metals, Total
Metals (TCLP)
Metals, Total
Metals (TCLP)
Metals, Total
Metals (TCLP)
Nitrogen (Ammonia)
Water
Water
Solids/Bulk material
Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Soil/Sediment
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Soil/Waste (oil, drum,
etc.)
Soil/Waste (oil, drum,
etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Soil/Waste (oil, drum,
etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Soil/Waste (oil, drum,
etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Soil/Waste (oil, drum,
etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Titrimetric
Titrimetric
PLM
PLM
1C
Titrimetric
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
1C
1C
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
ISE
1C
Colorimetric
Titrimetric
ICP/Calculation
CVAA
Direct Hg Analysis
CVAA
Direct Hg Analysis
CVAA
Direct Hg Analysis
CVAA
Direct Hg Analysis
CVAA
Direct Hg Analysis
ICP/AES
ICP/AES
ICP/AES
ICP/AES
ICP/AES
GFAA
GFAA
GFAA
GFAA
GFAA
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
ICP/MS
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
Electrode
Regional Capability
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Core Capabilities FY2014
I. Chemistry
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Nitrogen (NO3 &/or NO2)
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
Perchlorate
Phosphorus, Ortho
Phosphorus, Total
Sulfate
Sulfide
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Soil
Water
Water
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
1C
1C
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
1C
1C
1C with LC/MS confirmation
LC/MS
LC/MS/MS
Colorimetric
1C
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
1C
1C
Turbidimetric
Turbidimetric
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
1C, Turbidimetric
Titrimetric
Regional Capability
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
BNA
BNA (TCLP)
BNA (TPH)
BOD
COD
EDB & DBCP
Herbicides
Herbicides (TCLP)
Oil & Grease
Pesticides/PCBs
Pesticides (TCLP)
Phenolics
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Solid/Waste
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Solid/Waste
Solid/Waste
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Solid/Waste
Water
Soil/Sediment
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS or GC
GC/MS or GC
Membrane Electrode
Photometric
Colorimetric
GC/ECD
GC/ECD; GC/NPD
GC/ECD; GC/NPD
GC/ECD; GC/NPD
GC/ECD; GC/NPD
GC/ECD
HPLC/UV Detection
Gravimetric
Gravimetric
GC/ECD
GC/ECD
GC/ECD
GC/ECD
GC/ECD
Colorimetric
Colorimetric
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Core Capabilities FY2014
I. Chemistry
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
PAHs
TOO
TOO
VOA
VOA
VOA (TCLP)
VOA (TPH)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Air
Tissue (fish &/or plant)
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Water
Soil
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Air
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Solid/Waste
Water
Soil/Sediment
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
Combustion/IR
Combustion/IR
UV/Persulfate
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC
GC
GC
GC/MS
GC/MS or GC
GC/MS or GC
Regional Capability
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
II. Physical and Other Determinations
Flash Point
Conductivity
Ignitability
pH
Solids, Non-Filterable
Solids, Percent
Solids, Total
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Volatile
Turbidity
Aqueous/Liquid
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Pensky-Martens or Seta
Specific Conductance
Ignitability of Solids
Pensky-Martens or Seta
Closed Cup
Electrometric
Electrometric
Electrometric
Gravimetric
Gravimetric
Gravimetric
Gravimetric
Gravimetric
Nephelometric
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
III. Biology/Microbiology
Coliform, Total
Coliform, Fecal
E. coli
Toxicity (Acute & Chronic)
Heterotrophic PC
Water, Soil &/or
Sludge
Water, Soil &/or
Sludge
Water, Soil &/or
Sludge
Water
Water
Various
Various
Various
Fathead, Ceriodaphnia
Various
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 1
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Inorganic Anions
Mercury
Metals
Perchlorate
Water
Water, Tissue
Water, Sediment, Soil,
Waste (drum), Paint,
Dust, Cosmetics
Water
1C (EPA Method 300.0)
Direct Mercury Analyzer
(Thermal Decomposition,
Amalgamation & Atomic
Absorption
Spectrophotometry)
EPA Method 7473
XRF (EPA Method 6200)
LC/MS/MS (EPA Method
331.0)
Water
Superfund, Water
Superfund, TSCA (Pb)
Superfund/Water
Field Screening and
Laboratory Testing
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Carbonyls
1 ,4-Dioxane
Ethylene Glycol
Explosives
Oil Identification
Organic Compounds
Oxygenated
Compounds/Benzene
PAHs
PCBs
Pentachlorophenol
Pesticides/PCBs
Pharmaceuticals and Personal
Care Products (PPCP)
VOCs
Air
Water
Water
Water, Soil
Water
Solid, Liquid
Fuel
Soil/Sediment
Air, Wipes
Soil, Sediment
Water, Soil, Sediment,
Waste (drum)
Water, Soil, Sediment,
Waste (drum)
Water
Air (mini-cans)
Water, Soil, Air
HPLC (EPA Method TO-11A)
GC/MS Purge & Trap (EPA
Method 8260)
GC
HPLC (EPA Method 8330)
GC/FID(ASTMD-3415-79)
FTIR
IR (RFG Inspector's Manual)
Immunoassay (EPA Method
4035)
GC/ECD (EPA Method
3508A)
Immunoassay (EPA Method
4010)
GC/ECD (EPA Method
8081 A/8082)
GC/ECD (EPA Method 680)
LC/MS/MS
GC/MS (EPA Method TO-15)
GC/ECD/PID
Air
Superfund
Superfund
Superfund
Superfund - ERB
Air
Superfund
Air/Superfund
Superfund
Superfund
Superfund
Water
Superfund
Superfund
Unknown ID
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
Grain Size
Loss on Ignition (LOI)
Percent Lipids
Soil, Sediment
Sediment
Tissue
Sieve (Modified ASTM)
Gravimetric
Superfund, Water
Water
Region 1 SOP
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Enterococci
Chlorophyll a
Toxicity (Acute)
Ambient water
Ambient water
Sediment
Enterolert/EPA Method 1600
EPA 445.0
C. dilutus, H. azteca
Ambient monitoring
Ambient monitoring
Water, Superfund
Bulk sediment
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 2
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
CO
NOx
SO2
Percent Sulfur
Vanadium
Air/N2
Air/N2
Air/N2
Fuel Oil
Fuel Oil
EPA Reference or Equivalent
Method as in 40 CFR Part 58
EPA Reference or Equivalent
Method as in 40 CFR Part 58
EPA Reference or Equivalent
Method as in 40 CFR Part 58
ASTM D4294
ICP/AES
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Dry ashing at 525°C
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Asphaltenes (Hexane
Insolubles)
Methane, Ethane, Ethene
Ozone Precursors
(hydrocarbons)
Pesticides
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Fuel Oil
Water
Air
Wipes
Water, Solid
ASTM 3279
GC/FID
GC/MS/FID
LC/MS/MS and GC/MS
Hexane Extraction (EPA
Method 1664)
Air
SF/RCRA
Air
General
Water
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
Density
Grain Size
Particulates (Fine)
Percent Volatile Matter
Percent Water
Viscosity
Ink, Paint
Solid
Solid
Air
Ink, Paint
Fuel Oil
ASTM D1 475
Pipet Method
Hydrometer Method (based
on ASTM D422-63)
EPA Reference or Equivalent
Method as in 40 CFR Part 58
ASTM D2369
ASTMD4017
ASTM D88
Air
Superfund, Water
Superfund, Water
Air
Air
Air
Air
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Cryptosporidium
DMA - qPCR (Enterococcus)
DNA-qPCR E. coli
DNA, Markers, Various
Enterococcus Group
Giardia
mColiblue24
Enterolert w/Quantitray
Colilert 18/Colilert w/Quantitray
Water
Water (Fresh & Marine)
Water (Fresh & Marine)
Water (Fresh & Marine)
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Fluorescent Microscopy
(EPA Method 1623)
EPA/Cepheid Methodology
EPA/CDC Protocols
Geese, Gull, Cow, HF183,
Gen Bacteroidales
Membrane Filtration
Fluorescent Microscopy
(EPA Method 1623)
MF/Hach
Defined Substrate Technology
Defined Substrate Technology
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 3
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Nitroaromatics & Nitroamines
Nitroglycerine
Nitrogen, Total
Chemical Warfare Agents
PCB Congeners
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water
Water/Solid/Wipe
Water, Soil/Sediment,
semi-permeable
membrane device
(SPMD)
HPLC
HPLC
Colorimetric
GC/MS
HR GC/MS
Water
Water
Emergency Response
Method 8330
Method 8332
Method 1668C
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
ID Ozone-Depleting
Compounds
ID Unknowns
Alcohols
ID Unknowns
Propellants/Aerosols
Bulk Mercury
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water, Soil/Sediment
Wastes
FTIR
Density
FTIR
FTIR
FTIR
FTIR
Air Enforcement
Superfund, RCRA
Water
RCRA
Screening it, identify
unknowns
Screening it, identify
unknowns
When necessary for
ignitability
Screening it, identify
unknowns
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Marine/Estuarine Benthic
Invertebrate Taxonomy
Freshwater
Invertebrate Specimens
or Unsorted Sediment
Identification
EPA EMAP Protocols
Water
Organisms identified to
species or lowest taxonomy
possible
REGION 4
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Chromium (+6)
Mercury, Total - Ultra-Low
Detection Level
Metals, Total
Metals (TCLP)
Soil/Sediment
Water
Tissue
Soil/Sediment
Waste (oil, drum, etc.)
Air
Soil/Waste (oil, drum)
Std Method 3500 CrD
CVAF
CVAF
CVAF
ICP/MS
Hi-Vol Filters
ICP/MS
DW, Superfund
Water
Water, Superfund
Water, Superfund
RCRA
Air
RCRA
Method 1631
Appendix 1631
Appendix 1631
not commonly available
not commonly available
not commonly available
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Freon Products
Natural Attenuation Analytes
PCB Congeners
Toxaphene Congeners
Ultimate BOD
Canister & Air
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Tissue
Water/Soil
Water
GC/MS
GC/FID
None
None
None
GC/NIMS (EPA Method 8276)
Membrane Electrode (Std
Method 521 OC)
Air, OECA
Superfund
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
Water, Superfund
Water
Special analysis technique
developed for criminal
investigations of illegal Freon
Methane, ethane, ethene
High resolution GC/MS
High resolution GC/MS
High resolution GC/MS
6 parlars, 2 breakdown
products
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Chlorophyll
Water
Water
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 5
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Bromide/Chloride Ratio
Chloride
Metals
Brine Samples
Soil/Sediment
Suspended Particulate
Matter
1C & related characterization
techniques; ion balance
1C
ICP/MS
Water, UIC, &SDWA
Sediment
Air
Difficult analyses
Analysis of TSP, Pm10,PM2.5
filters for metals
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Nonylphenol (NP), NP-1 and 2-
ethoxylate, octyphenol, &
bisphenol-A
Nonylphenol (AP), AP-1 and 2-
ethoxylate, octyphenol, &
bisphenol-A
Nonylphenol (NP), NP-1 and 2-
ethoxylate, octyphenol
Bisphenol-A
Nonylphenol carboxylates
Long chain NP, NPEOs (n=3-
18)
COD
PCBs
PCB Congeners
Purgeable 1,4-Dioxane &
Tetrahydrofuran (THF)
Various analytes (VOAs,
SVOCs, & Pesticides/PCBs)
129 Toxic Industrial Chemicals
(TICs) & CWAdegradants (107
validated)
Aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone,
aldicarb sulfoxide, carbofuran,
oxamyl, methomyl, &thiofanox
Aldicarb, bromadiolone,
carbofuran, oxamyl, &
methomyl
Thiodiglycol
Thiodiglycol
Thiodiglycol
Diethanolamine,
triethanolamine,
n-methyldiethanolamine, &
methyldiethanolamine
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water
Water
Soil/Sediment
Water, Oil, Soil, Wipes
Water. Sludge
Water
Water, Soil/Sediment
Drinking Water
Water
Water
Water
Soil
Wipes
Water
GC/MS(ASTMD7065-11)
GC/MS (8270
modified/Internal SOP)
LC/MS/MS (ASTM D7485-09)
LC/MS/MS (ASTM D7574-09)
LC/MS/MS
LC/MS/MS (ASTM D7742-1 1)
Colorimetric
8082 (GC/EC)
GC/MS/MS, GC/NCI/MS
Method 624-Dioxane (Wide-
Bore Capillary Column GC/
MS)
ESAT FASP Methods GC/EC
for VOAs, SVOCs, &
Pesticides/PCBs (XRF for
metals)
LC/MS/MS Library Screening
LC/MS/MS, ASTM 7645-10
LC/MS/MS, ASTM 7600-09
LC/MS/MS, CRL SOP MS015
LC/MS/MS, ASTM E2787-1 1
LC/MS/MS, ASTM E2838-1 1
LC/MS/MS, ASTM D7599-09
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Sediment
TSCA
RCRA, SF, TSCA, Water
Superfund
Superfund
WSD, NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
Endocrine disrupter - high
concentration method (ppb)
Endocrine disrupter
Endocrine disrupter low-level
method (ppt)
Endocrine disrupter low-level
method (ppt)
Endocrine disrupter
Endocrine disrupter
Aroclor-specific TSCA reg.
Compliance method &
multiple action levels
Compare with HRGC/HRMS
method
Specific analyte analysis
method
Fast TAT onsite; Screening or
better data; Fast extraction for
organics
Library search routine
developed under CRADA with
Waters Corp. Now use NIST
LC/MS/MS Library of over
2,000 analytes
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 5
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Dioctyl Sulfosuccinat (DOSS)
in sea water
Dipropylene glycol monobutyl
ether ðylene glycol
monobutyl ether in seawater
Bromodiolone, brodifacoum,
diphacinone, & warfarin in
water
Diisopropyl
methylphosphonate, ethyl
hydrogendimethylamidophosph
ate, ethyl methylphosphonic
acid, isopropyl
methylphosphonic acid,
methylphosphonic acid, and
pinacoiyl methylphosphonic
acid
DIMP, EMPA, IMPA, MPA,
PMPA
Seawater
Seawater
Water
Water
Soil
LC/MS/MS, ASTM D7730-1 1
LC/MS/MS, ASTM D7731-11
LC/MS/MS, ASTM D7644-1 1
LC/MS/MS, ASTM 7597-09
LC/MS/MS, ASTM WK34580
NHSRC/SF
NHSRC/SF
NHSRC
NHSRC
NHSRC
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
SAP Method
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
Corrosivity by pH
Particle Size
Water Content
Paint Filter Test
Specific Gravity
Synthetic Precipitation
Leaching Procedure (SPLP)
Hazardous Waste
Soil/Sediment
Hazardous waste
Paints and coatings
Soil/Sediment
Solid Waste
SW8461110
Particle size analyzer
provides continuum of sizes -
CRL SOP
SW846
Appendix IV of the Corps of
Engineers Engineering
Manual (F10-F22)
SW8461312
RCRA
GLNPO, Water-Sediment
RCRA, Superfund
RCRA, Superfund
Sediment
RCRA, Superfund
Waste characterization
For modelling and soil
migration calcs
Support for flashpoint
For all TCLP analytes except
herbicides
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 6
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Ammonia
Ozone
NOx
SOx
Trace level Hex Chrome
Perchlorate
Metals by X-Ray Fluorescence
Air (passive coated
filter)
Air (passive coated
filter)
Air (passive coated
filter)
Air (passive coated
filter)
Water
Water
Soil
1C
1C
1C
1C
IC/UV
IC/MS/MS
portable XRF
CAA
CAA
CAA
CAA
Water
Water
Superfund, RCRA
Ogawa passive air collection
device
Ogawa passive air collection
device
Ogawa passive air collection
device
Ogawa passive air collection
device
field screening
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Fingerprint (pattern recognition)
Incidental PCBs
Chemical Warfare Agents
PAMS (C2s and C3s identified)
PCBs (Aroclor)
PAHs (trace)
Chemical Warfare Agents -
degradation products
VOCs by OVM
Organophosphorous Pesticides
(OPPs)
High-level waste
Oil
Fuel
Water
Soil/Sediment
Waste
Water/Solid/Wipe
Air
Electrical cable
Water/Solid/Oil
Water
Air
Water
Soil/Sediment
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS; Method 680
Homologue Series
GC/MS; Method 680
Homologue Series
GC/MS; Method 680
Homologue Series
GC/MS
GC/MS/FID (split)
GC; Separation, extraction,
analysis of individual
components; Mod of program
-specific technique
GC/QQQ
LC/MS/MS
GC/MS
GC/NPD
GC/NPD
GC/NPD
RCRA
RCRA
RCRA
TSCA, RCRA
TSCA, RCRA
TSCA, RCRA
Emergency Response
CAA
TSCA
RCRA, Superfund
Emergency Response
CAA
CWA, RCRA, Superfund
RCRA, Superfund
RCRA, Superfund
grouped by number of
chlorine
grouped by number of
chlorine
grouped by number of
chlorine
C2s and C3s are
individually quantitated
Toluene is extraction solvent
passive air monitoring
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
Corrosivity by pH
Waste
Method 1110 Corrosivity
Toward Steel
RCRA
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
Analyte/Group Name
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
CO
NOx
SO2
03
In-vitro Bioassessibility Assays
for Arsenic & Lead in Soil
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Chlordane
Herbicides
Pesticides
VOCs
PCBs
Pharmaceuticals and Personal
Care Products (PPCPs)
PAHs, Pesticides, Herbicides
VOCs
VOCs from In-situ Chemical
Oxidation Sites
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
E. coli
Enterococci
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Chlorophyll a
Invertebrate Taxonomy
Marine/Estuarine Benthic
Taxonomy
Sample Media
Air
Air
Air
Air
Soil
Air(PUF)
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water, Soil/Sediment,
Tissue
Air Canister
Air Sorbent Tube
Water
Soil/Sediment, Waste
Water
Water
Water, Soil, Air
Water
Water (drinking/waste/
ambient)
Water
Water
Ambient water
Invertebrates
Benthic Organisms
REGION 7
Analytical Technique
40 CFR Part 58
40 CFR Part 58
40 CFR Part 58
40 CFR Part 58
ICP/MS-ICP/AES
GC/ECD (EPA Method TO-
4A)
GC/ECD
GC/ECD
GC/MS (EPA Method TO-14
&TO-15)
GC/MS (EPA Method TO-17)
GC/MS
GC/ECD
LC/MS/MS
Twister GC/MS Stir Bar
Sorbtive Extraction
(solventless extraction)
GC/MS Mobile Laboratory
GC/MS
qPCR
qPCR
Plate Count - Standard
Methods
EPA 445.0
EPA EMAP Protocols
Supported Program(s)
Air
Air
Air
Air
Superfund/RCRA
Special Project
Water
Water
Air/Superfund
Air/Superfund
Superfund/ORD
Superfund/ORD
Water
Water
Superfund
Superfund
Water
Water
Water
Ambient monitoring
Water
Water
Comments
OAQPS Protocol Gas
Verification Program
OAQPS Protocol Gas
Verification Program
OAQPS Protocol Gas
Verification Program
NIST Standard Reference
Photometer
SUPR Exposure/Toxicity
Assessment
Use Attainability Analysis
(UAA)
Use Attainability Analysis
(UAA)
Air Toxics
Air Toxics
In-situ Chemical Oxidation
Site Support
Rapid Site Screening
Endocrine disrupters
Use Attainability Analysis
(UAA)
Rapid Site Characterization
Improved Precision of VOC
Samples from In-situ
Chemical Oxidation Sites
2008 NFWA
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Organisms identified to
species or lowest taxonomy
possible
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 8
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Silica
Gadilinium
Water
Water
Colorimetric
ICP/MS
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Wastewater Indicator
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Alcohols
Chlorophyll
Endothall
TPH (VOA & BNA)
LC/MS/MS Pesticides
Low-level Pesticides/CLLE
Metals - Arsenic/Selenium
speciation
Pharmaceuticals and Personal
Care Products (PPCPs)
Waste Indicator Compounds
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-
Diesel Range Organics
VOAs
Water
Water
Water
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water
Water
Water, Soil, Tissue
Water
Water
Water, Soil
Water, Soil/Sediment
GC/FID
HPLC
GC/MS
GC/MS or GC/FID
LC/MS/MS
GC/MS
IC/ICP/MS
LC/MS/MS
GC/MS
GC/FID
GC/PID/ELCD
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Monitoring for States & Tribes
Monitoring for States & Tribes
Speciation data needed for
risk assessment
Endocrine disrupters
Monitoring for States & Tribes
Hydro-fracking
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Bacteria (Arsenic-Reducing)
Bacteria (Iron-Reducing)
Bacteria (Sulfate-Reducing)
Bacteria (Clostridium
perfringens)
Water, Sediment
Water, Sediment
Water, Sediment
Water
MPN
MPN
MPN
Membrane Filtration
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
Water/Superfund
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 9
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Ferrous Iron
Mercury, Vapor, Particulate, &
Reactive
Methyl mercury
Metals (with mercury)
Metals (SPLP)
Low-level hexavalent chromium
Metals
Platinum Group Metals
Lead (Pb) in Air
Perchlorate
In-vitro bioassessibility assays
for arsenic & lead in soil
Water
Ambient Air
Water
Dust wipes, Ghost
wipes
Soil, Sediment, Solid,
Waste, Tissue
Drinking Water
Soil
Catalytic converter
washcoat
TSP high-volume filters
Water, Soil
Soil
Titration with Dichromate
Cold Vapor Atomic
Fluorescence
CVAF (EPA 1630)
ICP, ICPMS, CVAA
SW8461312:ICP, GFAA,
CVAA, ICP/MS
1C with post column reaction/
UV detection
Portable XRF
Portable XRF
FEM EQL-0710-192, ICP/MS
LC/MS/MS (EPA Method
331.0)
EPA 9200. 1-86
Superfund
Air, Water (TMDL)
Water
Tribal Program
Superfund, RCRA
Water
Superfund, Criminal
Investigation
Enforcement, Air
Air
Superfund/Water
Superfund
New Pb NAAQS
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Diazinon
1 ,4-Dioxane
EDB/DBCP
Methane, Ethane, Ethene
Water
Water, Soil, Sediment
Water
Water
ELISA
GC/MS
GC (EPA 504.1)
GC/FID(RSK-175)
WQM
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Benthic Taxonomic
Identification
Chlorophyll/Pheophytin
Enterococci
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Microcystin
Toxicity Test, Red Abalone
(Haliotis rufescens) Larval
Development
Toxicity Test, Sea Urchin
Fertilization (Stronglyocentrotus
purpuratus)
Sediment (Marine)
Water/Periphyton
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Taxonomic Identification
Standard Method 1 0200 H,
Procedure 2b
Enterolert
Plate Count - Standard
Methods
Immunoassay
EPA/600/R-95/136
EPA/600/R-95/136
Water, WQM
Water, WQM
Water, NPDES, WQM
Water, NPDES, WQM
Water
NPDES
Water, NPDES
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Unique Capabilities FY2014
REGION 10
Analyte/Group Name
Sample Media
Analytical Technique
Supported Program(s)
Comments
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Asbestos, Bulk
Low-Level Mercury
Methyl Mercury
Metals
Metals - Arsenic speciation
Metals (TAL) + Total Uranium
Metals (SPLP)
Chlorophyll a
In-vitro Bioassessibility Assays
for Lead in Soil
Percent Water
Perchlorate
Solids
Water
EPA600/R93/116-XRD
CVAF, Method 1 631 E
Water GC/CVAFS, Method 1630
Air filters
Blood
Soil
Paint
Solid
Fish/shellfish/seaweed
Small mammals,
invertebrates
Soil/Waste
Water
Soil
Liquid Waste
Produce (fruits, milk)
ICP/MS, ICP
ICP/MS
Portable XRF
Portable XRF
X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD)
IC/ICP/MS
Microwave Digestion, ICP/
AES, ICP/MS
ICP/AES, ICP/MS
SM1002H
Leachates by Method 1340,
ICP/AES
Karl Fischer titration
IC/MS
Superfund
Water, Superfund
Water, Superfund
CAA
Superfund
Superfund, Criminal
TSCA, Criminal
Superfund
Superfund, Water
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund
Water
Superfund
RCRA
Superfund
0.2 to 0.5 ng/L reporting limits
Screening results for metals
Lead in paint
Characterizes the form metals
exist in sample
Speciation data needed for
risk assessment
Biomonitoring projects
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
BNA (selected)
Butyl tins
1 ,4-Dioxane
Explosives (Nitroaromatics &
Nitroamines)
Hydrocarbon Identification
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Herbicides
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers
(PBDEs)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-
Gasoline Range Organics
VOA & SVGA
Low-level Polyaromatic
Hydrocarbons and
Other Neutral Organics
Low-level Polyaromatic
Hydrocarbons
Tissue
Soil/Sediment
Water
Water, Soil, fish/
shellfish
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water, Soil
Water, Soil/Sediment
Water
Sediment/bio solids
Tissue (fish)
Water, Soil
Water, Soil
Industrial wastes,
Solids, Tissues
Soil, Sediments
Shellfish, Water
SW846 Methods Superfund
GC/MS Superfund, Criminal
EPA Method 8270D SIM/
Method 522
EPA Method 8330/HPLC
NWTPH-HCID
Method 521
GC/MS
GC/MS Low Resolution
GC/MS Low Resolution
GC/MS Low Resolution
NWTPH-Gx
NWTPH-Dx
Vacuum distillation, Method
8261 A
GC/MS-MS
GC/MS-MS
Superfund
Superfund
Superfund, Criminal
Superfund
Superfund
Water
Superfund, Water
Superfund
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, Brownfields,
Water
Superfund, Brownfields
WDOE method
PHYSICAL AND OTHER DETERMINATIONS
Multi-Increment Sampling (MIS)
Preparation of Soil Samples for
Organic & Inorganic Analyses
Variety of water quality tests
Soil
Water
Described in Method 8330B
Appendix
Various probe-type
measurements
Superfund
Superfund
Flow thru cell system;
performed in the field
BIOLOGY/MICROBIOLOGY
Aeromonas spp
Cryptosporidium & Giardia
Enterococci
Microbial Source Tracking
Microscopic testing
Drinking Water
Water
Ambient Water
Water
Drinking/Source Water
EPA Method 1605
EPA Method 1623 (Filtration/
IMS Staining)
EPA Method 1600
PCR
Microscopic particulate
analysis
SDWA- Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring Rue
(UCMR)
SDWA, Water, Ambient
Monitoring Rule - recreational
waters
Ambient Monitoring Rule
Water
Surface Water Treatment
Rule
EPA Approved
On approval list for LT-2
regulation
Microscopic technique used to
establish GWUDI
characteristics of a drinking
water
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014
REGION 1
Project Method
Enterococcus in Water by qPCR (EPA
Method 1611) Capability Development
Developmental Need
Water
Status
In progress
Projected Completion
FY2014
REGION 2
SIM Analysis for VOA&
Semi-VOA analysis
MST Markers, Pig, Cow, Gull
PCPP Hospital Waste
Drinking & Surface Water
Stormwater
Emergency Contamination
Developing methods on current
instrumentation
Completed
Completed
FY2015
REGION 3
Arsenic Speciation for Water, Soil/
Sediment, & Tissue by 1C or ICP/MS
EPA Method 1694 for Pharmaceuticals
& Personal Care Products by LC/MS/
MS
PCR Quantitation & Source Tracking
Glycols in Water
ELISA
Independent Laboratories Institute
Solid-Phase Extraction Study
Speciation data to be used for
Risk Assessments in support of
Clean Water Act & Superfund
Need for capability to identify &
quantify pharmaceutical &
personal care products
Need for capability to determine
source of E. coli contamination in
support of Water Program
Need for capability to identify
glycol compounds in groundwater
using LC/MS/MS to achieve lower
quantitation limits
Need for in-field testing of surface
& drinking water for presence of
estrogen & estrogen-like
compounds
Office of Water
Identified developmental need;
initiated research & evaluation of
analytical procedures; project placed
on hold due to lack of demand for
analysis
Cancelled due to loss of analyst
In-progress
Complete
Complete
Continued work
On Hold
On Hold
FY2013
FY2013
FY2013
REGION 4
EPA Method 8261
Internal Method - GC/MS/MS
Pesticides by Method 8081 , DDT Suite
Pesticides by Method 8270D using GC/
MS/MS
Low-level TO-1 5 using Selective Ion
Monitoring simultaneous Full Scan
Hydride ESI Autosamplerfor high
matrix samples and lower reporting
limits for arsenic and selenium
Release of silica and other metals from
nanoparticle study
Bioavailability of lead
VOCs in difficult matrices
Low-level Pesticides w/MS
confirm
Superfund
Superfund
Superfund, Air
ODMDS, Superfund, TMDL
ORD
Superfund
Initial investigation
ITMEs in-process
Paper was published 2014
Continued Work
Continued Work
Continued Work
Continued Work
Continued Work
Unknown
January 2015
REGION 5
PFOA/PFOS in Biosolids & Water
qPCR, Gene Sequencing Guar Gum
Methane, Ethane, & Ethene in Water
by GC/FID
Fluorotelemer Alcohols in Water by LC/
MS/MS
Standard Operating Procedure for
Analysis of (Tri-n-butyl)-n
tetradecylphosphonium chloride
(TTPC) in Soil by Multiple Reaction
Monitoring Liquid Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)
PFOA/PFOS in Biosolids
PFOA/PFOS in Water
Methane, Ethane and Ethene in Water
qPCR Gene Sequencing Guar Gum
Fluorotelemer Alcohols in Water by LC/
MS/MS
Water Division study - RMI
HF fluid screening tool - Region 3
support
Water Program request
Water
SF Emergency Response
Water
Water
Water
Water, HF
Water
Initial work done, new instrument
installed & standards run to set
up instrument.
Some samples sequenced; screening
tool in process
Method developed; SOP in draft
Initiated
Initiated and Completed
Completed
Completed
Continued work
Continued work
Continued work
FY2015
FY2015
FY2015
FY2015
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014
REGION 6
Project Method
Anions and Oxyhalides by 1C
Asbestos
Alcohols by Headspace GC/MS
Analysis
Dissolved Gasses in Water by GC/FID
Direct mercury analysis (CVAF -
milestone)
PAHs by GC/QQQ
Dinitrotoluene minor isomers
High Dissolved Solids Modified
Method/Anion
High Dissolved Solids/Modified
Method/Cation
High Dissolved Solids/Modified
Method/OA
PPCP analysis
Passive Formaldehyde
Induction-Coupled Plasma Axial
Method
Cyanide in Soil Matrix
Sulfide in Water Matrix
Low Molecular Weight Acids in
Resource Extraction Analysis
Haloacetic Acids in Resource
Extraction Analysis
PAHs by GC/QQQ
Dinitrotoluene minor isomers
High Dissolved Solids/Modified
Method/Anion
High Dissolved Solids / Modified
Method/Cation
High Dissolved Solids/Modified
Method/OA
PPCP analysis
Passive Formaldehyde
Induction Coupled Plasma Axial
Method
Cyanide in Soil Matrix
Sulfide in Water Matrix
Low Molecular Weight Acids in
Resource Extraction Analysis
Haloacetic Acids in Resource
Extraction Analysis
Developmental Need
Remove dependence on State
Lab for this test
Superfund/RCRA Enforcement
Energy Extraction
Energy Extraction
Clean Water Act, RCRA,
Superfund
RCRA, Superfund
Superfund
Clean Water Act, RCRA,
Superfund
Clean Water Act, RCRA,
Superfund
Clean Water Act, RCRA,
Superfund
Water
Clean Air Act
Superfund; new technique to
generate lower reporting limits for
metals
RCRA & Superfund
RCRA & Superfund
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund
Superfund, RCRA, CWA
Superfund, RCRA, CWA
Superfund, RCRA, CWA
CWA
CAA
Superfund
Superfund, RCRA
Superfund, RCRA
SDWA
SDWA
Status
Method developed, need DOC/MDL;
SO Ps
Training; DOC; SOP preparation
Completed during FY2013
Completed during FY2013
DOC/MDL; SOP preparation
Continued method development
Continued method development
Method being developed
Method being developed
Method being developed
Method being developed
Method being developed
Method being developed; performance
studies are ongoing
Method being developed
Initiated method development
Method being developed
Method being developed
Completed
Completed
Continued
Continued
Continued
Continued
Continued
Continued
Completed
Completed
Continued
Continued
Projected Completion
September 201 4
Program-dependent
December 201 3
December 201 3
December 201 4
December 2014
December 201 4
October 201 4
October 201 4
October 201 4
April 201 4
Summer 2014
FY2014
FY2014
FY2014
Spring 2015
FY2014
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014
REGION 7
Project Method
EPA Method 1694 for Pharmaceuticals
& Personal Care Products by HPLC/
MS/MS
Pesticides by GC/MS/MS
Microbial Source Tracking Using qPCR
Arsenic Speciation for Water, Soil/
Sediment & Tissue by 1C or ICP/MS
EPA Method 1 694 for Pharmaceuticals
& Personal Care Products by HPLC/
MS/MS
PAH/SVOC in Water by Stir Bar
Sorbtive Extraction
Airborne VOC by solid sorbent tube
(EPA Method TO-1 7)
Arsenic Speciation for Water, Soil/
Sediment & Tissue by 1C or ICP/MS
Developmental Need
Speciation data to be used for
Risk Assessments in support of
Clean Water Act & Superfund
Confirmational analysis of
pesticide analytes previously
performed by GC/ECD
TMDL & Stormwater
Speciation data to be used for
Risk Assessments in support of
Clean Water Act & Superfund
Water
Water, SUPR
Water, SUPR, RCRA
Water
Status
Performing method validation studies
on surrogate compounds; developing
SOP
Instrument installed, method
development & validation pending
Non-human marker test completed;
pending additional technical method
guidance from ORD
Method development currently
underway
Continued work
Continued work
Continued work
continuing
Projected Completion
FY2015
FY2016
FY2015
FY2015
REGION 8
Asbestos/Electron Microscope
Endocrine Disrupter Studies/LC/MS/MS
Macroinvertebrate - Freshwater
Benthic/Manual Enumeration
Microbial Source Tracking
Microbial Source Tracking by PCR
Arsenic Speciation for Water, Soil/
Sediment, &Tissue/IC/ICP/MS
Toxicity - Acute & Chronic in Mobile
Lab
Pharmaceuticals by LC/MS/MS
Pesticides by LC/MS/MS
Hormones & Steroids by LC/MS/MS
Algal Toxins
Need for capabilities to analyze
water & soils for asbestos
contamination at Superfund sites
Emerging needs for the Water
program & ORD
Redevelop capability for Water
program support due to loss of
staff
Develop capabilities in this
technology for use in projects &
emerging needs for the
Superfund, Water programs, &
ORD
Develop capabilities in this
technology for use in projects and
emerging needs for the Water,
Enforcement programs and ORD.
Speciation data to be used for
Risk Assessments in support of
Clean Water Act & Superfund
Onsite assessment for potential
needs by the Water program
Water& ORD
Water
Water& ORD
Water
Instrument operational & running
samples
Performing method validation
Planning to hire replacement staff
Biolog system installed; some staff
trained; assessing method
Instruments & sample processing,
ESAT staff training and/or assessing
methods
Identified developmental need;
initiated research & evaluation of
analytical procedures; necessary
modifications to laboratory in progress
Mobile lab available; team lead
initiating discussion of projects & team
development
Progress continuing
Progress continuing
Progress continuing
continuing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
REGION 9
Low-level total mercury in
water (EPA 1 631 E)
Analysis of Radiello passive air
samplers for VOCs
Anatoxin-a analysis using Receptor
Binding Assay (RBA)
Analysis of lead (Pb) on Teflon PM2 5
Filters
Methyl Mercury in Environmental
Samples
Address regional priority
Address regional priority
Water Program monitoring for
cyanotoxins
Air
Water
Instrumentation installed;
method development initiated
Assessing health & safety issues
Method development Initiated; no new
equipment needed; SOP drafted
Continued
Completed
FY2015
FY2015
EarlyFY2016
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
ll
Regional Laboratories Developing Capabilities FY2014
REGION 10
Project Method
Develop Methyl Mercury Analysis
Capability for Sediment Samples
EPA Method 8330B Marine Tissue
Method Evaluation/Development
Ultra-trace Concentration Phosphorus
Method for Treated Wastewater
Effluent & Surface Water
Low-level Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Phenolics, &
Other Neutral Organics in Soils &
Sediments
Low-level PAH Analyses of Waters &
Clam Tissues
EPA Method 8330B Marine Tissue
Method Evaluation/Development-Multi-
Lab Study
Low Level Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons, Phenolics and Other
Neutral Organics Analyses of Soil and
Sediments
Low Level Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons Analyses of Waters and
Clam Tissues
Develop Methyl Mercury Analysis
Capability for Sediment Samples
Ultra-trace Concentration Phosphorus
Method for Treated Wastewater
Effluent and Surface Water
Developmental Need
Methyl mercury data needed to
support regional mercury strategy
toward characterizing levels in the
environment & evaluate public
health risks
Explosive concentration data in
marine tissue samples are needed
to help evaluate marine areas
polluted with military munitions
NPDES compliance monitoring at
ultra-low phosphorus levels
Measure PAHs & other semi-
volatile neutral organic
compounds at low concentrations
in marine sediments to assess
against NW states cleanup
standards with organic carbon
normalization
Measure PAHs at low levels in
clam tissues to support risk
assessment activities
Superfund
Superfund, Brownfields, Water
Superfund, Brownfields, Water
Superfund, Water
Water
Status
Some initial testing on instrument
conducted; based on the effort needed
to develop the water method,
capability for sediment analyses will
likely require much experimentation
with the Brooks-Rand instrument to
acquire the needed accuracy &
sensitivity for
sediments
Method development Completed;
multi-laboratory study through the
QATS contract is in progress
Ultra-trace standard concentration
measurements were achieved on a
Lachat colorimetric instrument & an
ICP/MS system; testing on actual
effluent samples still to be planned
GC/MS/MS system was setup for
extract analyses at very low
concentrations
Low-level Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons Analyses of Waters &
Clam Tissues
Completed
Completed
Completed
Continued work
Continued work
Projected Completion
FY2015
Completed FY2014
FY2015
Developed and Completed FY2014
Developed and Completed FY2014
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Appendix A Acronyms/Abbreviations
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Acronyms/Abbreviations
ACIL
ADEM
AQS
ASTM
BMP
BNA
BOD
CAA
CDC
CENWP
CERCLA
CFR
CID
CLP
COD
Cr
CVAA
CWA
DBCP
DECA
DNT
EDB
EPA
ESAT
FDA
FY
GC
GC/ECD
GC/FID
GC/MS
GC/MS/MS
GC/NPD
GFAA
Hg
HPLC/UV
1C
ID
-A-
American Council of Independent Laboratories
Alabama Department of Environmental Management
Air Quality System
American Society for Testing and Materials
-B-
best management practice
base/neutrals and acids
biological oxygen demand
-C-
Clean Air Act
Centers for Disease Control
Corps of Engineers' Portland District
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Code of Federal Regulations
Criminal Investigation Division
Contract Laboratory Program
chemical oxygen demand
Chromium
cold vapor atomic absorption
Clean Water Act
-D-
Dibromochloropropane
Division of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance
dinitrotoluene
-E-
ethylene dibromide
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Services Assistance Team
-F-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Fiscal Year
-G-
gas chromatography
gas chromatography/electron capture detector
gas chromatography/flame ionization detector
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry
gas chromatography/nitrogen-phosphorous detector
graphic furnace atomic absorption
-H-
Mercury
high performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet
-1-
ion chromatography
identification
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Acronyms/Abbreviations
ICP
ICP/AES
ICP/MS
III
ISE
ISO
LC/MS
LC/MS/MS
LHC
LTIG
MCHM
MCR
MeHg
MPRSA
NEIC
NELAC
NGO
NO2
N03
MRS A
ODMDS
ORCR
ORD
OSC
OSWER
OU
PAH
PC
PCB
PCE
PEP
PFC
PM
-I-
Inductively-coupled plasma
Inductively-coupled plasma/atomic emission spectrometry
Inductively-coupled plasma/mass spectrometry
Independent Laboratories Institute
ion selective electrode
International Standards Organization
-J-
-K-
-L-
liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry
light hydrocarbon
Laboratory Technical Information Group
-M-
4-methylcyclohexanemethanol
Mouth of the Columbia River
methylmercury
Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act
-N-
National Enforcement Investigations Center
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference
Non-Governmental Organizations
nitrite
nitrate
National Rivers and Streams Assessment
-O-
Ocean-Dredged Material Disposal Site
Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Office of Research and Development
On-Scene Coordinator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Operable Unit
-P-
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
plate count
polychlorinated biphenyl
tetrachloroethylene
Performance Evaluation Program
perfluorinated chemical
particu late matter
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
FY2014 Annual Report
Acronyms/Abbreviations
PNW
PPCP
PPH
QAPP
QC
QuEChERS
R2P2
RCRA
RLN
RMN
SCAS
SIMS
SIP
SLAMS
SOP
SPE
SRB
STP
TCE
TCLP
TMDL
TOC
TPH
TTPC
USAGE
U.S. EPA
uses
VOA
VOC
-P-
Pacific Northwest
Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Product
polyglycol ethers
-Q-
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Quality Control
Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe
-R-
Regional Research Partnership Program
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Regional Laboratory Network
Regional Monitoring Network
-S-
semi-continuous activated sludge
secondary ion mass spectrometry
state implementation plan
State and Local Air Monitoring Station
standard operating procedure
solid-phase extraction
sulfate-reducing bacteria
sewage treatment plant
-T-
trichloroethylene
toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
total maximum daily load
total organic carbon
total petroleum hydrocarbon
(Tri-n-butyl)-n-tetradecylphosphoniumchloride
-U-
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Geological Survey
-V-
volatile organic analysis
volatile organic compound
-W-
-X-
-Y-
-Z-
EPA 910-R-15-002
-------
-------
------- |