NONPOINT SOIREE SICCESS STOIY
 Addressing Agricultural and Residential Bacteria Sources Improves

 Water Quality in the Leon and South Leon Rivers

,A/           r     i             I  High levels of bacteria prompted the Texas Commission on
Waterbodes  improved  c   .         ln      ,T™ +              D-   /•  iQQCi
                                   Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to add the Leon River (in 1996)
 and South Leon River (in 2006) to the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters
 for not supporting the primary contact recreation use. The Texas State Soil and Water Conservation
 Board (TSSWCB) provided CWA section 319(h) grant funding to develop a watershed protection plan
 (WPP) to address the bacteria impairments in the Leon River watershed. Watershed stakeholders
 voluntarily implemented best management practices (BMPs) and conducted public outreach and
 education. Through these efforts,  water quality improved and the South Leon River (assessment
 unit [AU] 1221B_01) and three assessment units of the Leon River below Proctor Lake (AU 1221_01,
 1221_04, and 1221_05) were removed from the state's list of impaired waters in 2014.
 Problem
 The 1,375-square-mile Leon River watershed in central
 Texas is bounded by Proctor Lake upstream and Belton
 Lake downstream (Figure 1). The Leon River is 190
 miles long, and drains portions of Comanche, Erath,
 Hamilton, and Coryell counties. The watershed is
 largely rural, with most of the land suited for grazing
 by cattle and goats; a few animal feeding opera-
 tions are also present. These agricultural operations,
 wildlife, feral hogs and on-site sewage facilities (OSSFs)
 have the potential to be sources of bacteria loadings.
 South Leon River, a tributary of the Leon River, shares
 the land use features of the larger watershed.

 Data collected in the Leon River (1990-1995) showed
 that fecal coliform levels exceeded the bacteria water
 quality standard (WQS) for contact recreation. As a
 result, TCEQ added the river to the 1996 CWA sec-
 tion 303(d) list for not supporting its primary contact
 recreation use. In 2000 the bacteria WQS changed to
 an Escherichia co//-based standard requiring that E. coli
 levels not exceed a geometric mean of 126 colony-
 forming units (cfu) per 100 milliliters (ml) of water.
 Data collected from 1998 to 2005 showed that the
 geometric mean for E. coli exceeded the standard in
 South Leon River. As a result, TCEQ added South Leon
 River to the 2006 CWA section 303(d)  list for not sup-
 porting its primary contact recreation use.
                                     Leon River Seg
                                     	 1221 _01
                                       1221 _04
                                     	 1221 _05
                                     South Leon River Seg
                                     	 1221BJI1
                                     	 Rivers
                                     	 USStateHighways
                                       US State Secondary Highways
                                       Leon River and Streams
                                     	Lakes
                                     I  I City
                                       Counties
                                     I  I Leon River HUCs
                                     I  I Leon RiverWS
Figure 1. The Leon River watershed is in central Texas.
Project Highlights
Water quality impairments in the Leon River and some
of its tributaries prompted TCEQ to begin develop-
ing a bacteria total maximum daily load in 2002.
Local stakeholders, wanting to take an active role in
developing management strategies to reduce bacteria
loadings, sought to initiate the development of a WPP.
The TSSWCB provided CWA section 319(h) funding to

-------
Measured [.Coli
gr ~ I i 1
South Leon River f. Coli Levels
*
Standard: 126
» *«»» A * *cfu/100mL
**V*J * 1* ,

'2005 10/10/2006 2/22/2008 7/6/2009 11/18/2010 V1/2012 8/14/2013
Sample Date
                                                             in Hamilton County. Implementation continued after
                                                             2012, and additional counties in the watershed have
                                                             received funding to fix failing OSSFs.
Figure 2. Bacteria levels in the South Leon River have dropped.

       the Brazos River Authority to facilitate the develop-
       ment of a WPP for the Leon River. The stakeholder
       group leading the WPP development included repre-
       sentatives from Commissioner's courts (i.e., county
       governments), agricultural producers, wildlife inter-
       ests, soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs), the
       dairy industry, cities and various other interests in the
       watershed. A technical advisory group, composed of
       representatives from federal, state and local agencies;
       universities; and other entities provided expertise to
       the stakeholder group.

       Management measures identified in the WPP were
       implemented by stakeholders. Several outreach and
       education programs were implemented to inform local
       stakeholders of available  resources.

       The TSSWCB, partnering with the Upper Leon, Mills
       County and the Hamilton-Coryell SWCDs, certified
       and implemented 13 water quality management plans
       on 4,058 acres in the impaired watersheds. These
       plans included alternative water sources, prescribed
       grazing, cross-fencing, grassed waterways, nutrient
       management and grass planting. In addition, the
       U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources
       Conservation Service (NRCS) worked with landowners
       to implement conservation practices (e.g., prescribed
       grazing, grass and range planting, nutrient manage-
       ment, residue management, conservation cover, water
       wells, water troughs, ponds) using Environmental
       Quality Incentives Program and Agricultural Water
       Enhancement Program funding on over 388,600 acres
       in the Leon River watershed and over 47,600 acres in
       the South Leon River watershed. From May through
       November 2012, TSSWCB partnered with Hamilton
       County and Texas A&M AgriLife to help repair or
       replace 10 failing OSSFs along or near the Leon River
                                                            Results
Monitoring data show that waters meet the state
WQS for contact recreation in several portions of
the Leon River (101.82 cfu/100 mL in AU 1221JD1;
67.82 cfu/100 mL in AU 1221JD4; 99.23 cfu/100
mL in AU 1221JD5 for 2005-2012 assessment data)
and all of South  Leon River (116.93 cfu/100 mL for
2005-2012 assessment data)(Figure 2). Consequently,
the entire length (17 miles) of the South Leon River
(AU 1221BJD1) was removed from the state's list of
impaired waters in 2014. In addition, three AUs of the
Leon River (1221JD1, 1221JD4, and  1221JD5) were
removed from the impaired waters list in 2014 (see
Figure 1). These  waterbodies currently support all their
designated uses.

The success can  be attributed to conservation practice
implementation, repaired or replaced failing OSSFs,
and increased stakeholder awareness due to the
watershed planning process. Water quality monitor-
ing continues to  track and measure interim progress
to implement the Leon River WPP and ensure the
restoration effort remains a success.
Partners and Funding
Over $433,550 in CWA section 319(h) funds (provided
by the TSSWCB), combined with more than $353,680
in nonfederal matching funds from TSSWCB and the
Brazos River Authority, supported developing the
WPP, collecting and analyzing water samples, develop-
ing pollutant loading models, facilitating stakeholder
involvement in the watershed planning  process and
crafting the WPP.

The Hamilton-Coryell and Upper Leon SWCDs worked
with landowners to voluntarily implement conserva-
tion practices to reduce the impact of livestock on
grazing land. The TSSWCB and the NRCS worked
through the SWCDs to provide approximately $47,200
in state funding and $1,924,000 in federal Farm Bill
funding to landowners as financial incentives to imple-
ment BMPs and  provide technical assistance. More
than $60,000 in  CWA section 319(h) funds matched
with over $8,500 in state and local funds were used to
repair or replace failing OSSFs.
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Office of Water
               Washington, DC


               EPA841-F-16-001I
               May 2016
For additional information contact:
Brian Koch, Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board
979-532-9496 • bkoch@tsswcb.texas.gov
Megan Wilson, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
512-239-1165 • Megan.Wilson@tceq.texas.gov

-------