OPERATING A FUEL CELL USING LANDFILL GAS        EPA/6QO/A-96/128
                     C. E. Trippel, Northeast Utilities Service Company
           J. L. Preston, Jr. and J. C. Trocciola, International Fuel Cells Corporation
                    R. J. Spiegel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 An ONSI PC25™,  200 kW (nominal capacity) phosphoric acid fuel cell operating on landfill gas
 (LFG) is  installed  at the Town of Groton Flanders Road  landfill in Groton, Connecticut.  This
 joint project by the Connecticut Light & Power Company (CL&P) which  is an operating
 company of Northeast Utilities, the Town of Groton, International  Fuel Cells (IFC), and the
 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is intended to demonstrate the viability
 of installing, operating, and maintaining a fuel cell operating on LFG at a landfill site.  The
 goals of the project are to evaluate the fuel cell and gas pretreatment unit (GPU) operation, test
 modifications to simplify the design, and demonstrate the reliability of the entire system.

 In 1990, the EPA contracted with IFC  to design and build a landfill GPU that would allow LFG
 to be used by a fuel cell. Upon successful demonstration of the GPU, the fuel cell was installed
 at the Penrose Landfill  in  Los Angeles to demonstrate the system operation.  The  energy
 recovery system operated for approximately 3 months, concluding operations in February 1995.
 In order to verify operation on a different composition LFG and in different climatic conditions,
 the energy recovery system was  shipped to the East Coast.   Discussions between all parties
 resulted in the Town of Groton landfill being chosen as a site to continue operation of the fuel
 cell  and GPU system. The EPA is  the current owner of the  fuel  cell and the  GPU and is
 providing technical expertise for the project. CL&P is the funding source for the project and is
 providing the engineering, design, and construction for the installation as well  as the operation
 and  maintenance for the  12-18  month demonstration period.   IFC is  providing technical
 expertise for the operation of the  fuel  cell and GPU system.  The Town of Groton is providing
 the site as well as the collected LFG and operation of an existing LFG flare at no cost to CL&P.

 The  LFG is collected from an 18.2 ha  (45 acre) closed  landfill. Based on the estimated volume
 of solid waste in the Groton landfill, a calculated 5.8 million m1 (204 million ft1) of LFG would
 be produced annually. Prior to the  installation of the fuel cell system at Groton, the LFG was
 collected and burned in a flare at a rate of approximately 0.189  m'/s (400 cfm). The fuel cell
 system uses a maximum of 0.0378 mVs (80 scftn) of landfill  gas while the remaining  gas
 continues to be burned by the flare.  Where LFG is emitted into the atmosphere without recovery
 and  use, methane has a global warming potential much greater than that of carbon dioxide
 (CO2).  Some  of the non-methane  constituents of LFG,  such as hydrogen sulfide (HjS), are
 odoriferous and potentially harmful to the environment.

The  fuel cell emissions are primarily water vapor and CO2. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX)
and  sulfur dioxide  (SOJ, which result from the combustion  of  LFG, are virtually eliminated.
Due  to its higher efficiency, the  quantity  of  CO3 emitted from the fuel cell  is less than the
amount created through combustion conversion electrical generators such  as  the combustion
turbine and internal combustion engine. A comparison of typical emission rates  is:

                            Typical Emission Rates (g/kWh)
               Combustion                     Internal
               Turbine                   Combustion Engine           Fuel Cell
NOX            0.694                           0.417                  0.004
SO2            0.077                           0.054                   0
CO2            889.041                         621.421                 435.449

-------
                                   TRIPPEL ET AL.
                                           2
 System Description at the Groton Landfill

 The LFG is collected from the closed and capped landfill through a series of wells and is drawn
 out of the landfill by the flare blower.  This maintains an absolute pressure of 99.8 kPa (14.5
 psia) on the collection system.  An LFG compressor draws LFG from a collection header and
 compresses the gas to 276 kPa (40 psig) for use in the GPU.  Two H,S absorbers, using activated
 carbon as the absorbing medium, are installed on the suction side of the compressor to remove
 the H,S from the gas stream prior to compression.  A moisture separator prior  to the EL.S
 absorbers removes any bulk moisture present in the gas.  The H,S absorbers are installed in a
 parallel/series arrangement where normal operation is in series but either absorber can be
 removed from service while the other is in service. This is useful for carbon changeout during
 operation or testing the removal effectiveness of an individual absorber.

 The gas is discharged from the gas compressor and into the GPU where moisture and volatile
 organic compounds (VOCs) including sulfides and halogenated compounds are removed.  The
 GPU has dual cleanup trains so when one train  is in service cleaning the gas the other is being
 regenerated with a portion of the cleaned gas. The regeneration gas, in the quantity of 0.0118
 mVs (25 scfrn), is combusted in an enclosed flare. The cleanup train consists of an alumina plus
 mole sieve dryer vessel which removes the moisture from the gas, a carbon vessel which absorbs
 hydrocarbons and VOCs, and a refrigeration unit and heat exchanger which are used to cool the
 gas to 274.3 K (34°F) prior to entering the cleanup train. The gas leaves the GPU consisting of
 methane, C02, and trace amounts of nitrogen and oxygen. The dew point of the gas is 244.3 K (-
 20°F). The specific composition of the Groton LFG leaving the GPU is:

        Methane-       57.1%
        Carbon dioxide-41.0%
        Nitrogen-       1.5%
        Oxygen -        0.4%

The fuel cell has been modified for  operation on LFG to accept the higher flow rate required
because of the reduced methane content in the LFG.  These modifications include a larger fuel
control valve and fuel control venturi plus resizing of two fixed orifices.  Minor modifications
were also made to the control settings.

Site Layout

Figure  1  is a  site layout  plan that  shows the equipment  configuration.   The  total  site
encompasses an area 13.12 m (43 ft) wide by 41.15 m (135 ft) long and is enclosed by a chain
link fence.  Located at the south end of the site are the existing LFG flare and a newly installed
underground storage tank to collect condensate that comes from the landfill with the gas as well
as from the GPU.  The GPU control room houses the GPU control panel, refrigeration unit purge
air  compressor, nitrogen  bottles for actuating the  GPU  pneumatic  valves, and  project
documentation. The GPU flare is used to combust the regeneration ps. The gas pretreatment
unit building is a pre-engineered building with aluminum sided and insulated walls and roof.
The space inside the building is considered a Class  1, Division 2 location, and all electrical
equipment and fixtures are explosion proof. Enclosed in the gas pretreatment unit building is the
LFG moisture separator, HL.S absorber vessels, gas compressor, GPU, and refrigeration unit.  A
combustible gas detector is used to monitor the interior atmosphere and ultimately shut down the

-------
                                    TRJPPEL ET AL.
                                            3
gas compressor if gas is detected.  A compressed natural gas (CNG) bottle rack is required to
supply start up burner fuel for the fuel cell and for the GPU flare.  The fuel cell and cooling
module are in the standard configuration for a  typical installation.   A  nitrogen bottle rack
external to the fuel cell is used to increase bottle  capacity and facilitate bottle changeout. The
switchgear contains the distribution bus and breakers  for the  fuel  cell and  all  other site
equipment.  The step-up  transformer  takes the  480 V  power from the  fuel cell output and
increases it to 13,800 V for use on the utility grid.  The equipment and site layout are designed
for unmanned operation.  Remote data monitoring of the fuel cell and GPU controller will be
utilized.

Project Status

Construction was completed in mid-June 1996, and system start-up and testing was in  progress
at the time of the submittal of this paper in late August 1996. Prior to  start-up of the fuel cell,
the GPU was started and operated for 200 hours, and gas  quality suitable for fuel cell operation
was verified. Operation of the fuel cell at the Groton site  on  landfill gas has been achieved with
an output of 165 kW obtained to date. The power generated is enough to supply over  100 homes
and is fed into the local utility grid.  Continued testing and refinement of the system is expected
to achieve a continuous net fuel cell output of 140 kW.

Conclusion

The operation of fuel cells on landfill gas presents an opportunity to  use a waste gas that is
harmful to the environment  to generate  electricity more cleanly and efficiently than other
methods currently used. The use  of other bio gases, such as from waste water treatment plants
and livestock wastes, in fuel cells is possible as a result of the work performed using LFG as a
fuel.   This project brings bio gas conversion using fuel cells  one step closer to commercial
application.

-------
        77W¥>£1 ET AL.
          SWfTCHGEAft
              m
              STEP-Ui
               XfMR
           FUEL
           CELL
                                COOLING
                               'MODULE
     C3CNG BOTTLE RACK
            H2S ABSORBER VESSELS  /
         GAS PRETREATMENT
                   CQNDENSATE
                    STORAGE
      LFG TO
     FLAKE ft
     F(/£L CEIT
     EQUIPMENT
HL°J
           F/gure /
Groton Fuel Cell Sfte Layout

-------
NRMRL-RTP-P-160
       TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completin
1. REPORT NO.
    EPA/600/A-96/128
                           2,
                                                       3. R)
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Operating a Fuel Cell Using Landfill Gas
                                                       5. REPORT DATE
                                                       6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
C.E.Trippel (NUS); J.L.Preston,  Jr.  and J. C.
 Trocciola (IFC); and R. J. Spiegel (EPA)
                             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Northeast Utilities    and  International Fuel Cells
 Service Co.                Corp.
PC Box 270                195 Governors Hwy
Hartford,  CT 06141        S. Windsor, CT 06074
                                                       10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                              68-D1-0008 (IFC)
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
 Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                              Published paper; 5-9/96
                             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                               EPA/600/13
is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES APPCD project officer is Ronald J.  Spiegel, Mail Drop 63, 919/
541-7542.  Presented at Fuel Cell Seminar, Orlando,  FL, 11/17-20/96.
i6. ABSTRACT
              paper discusses operating a 200- kW phosphoric acid fuel cell using
landfill gas (LFG) in Groton,  Connecticut.  The project is intended to demonstrate the
viability of installing, operating, and maintaining a fuel cell operating on LFG at a
landfill site. The goals  of the project are to evaluate the fuel cell and gas pretreat-
ment unit (GPU) operation,  test modifications to simplify the design, and demon-
strate the reliability of  the system. The operation of the fuel cell on LFG presents
an opportunity to use a waste  gas that is harmful to the environment to generate elec-
tricity more cleanly and efficiently than other methods currently used. The use of
other bio gases, such as from waste water  treatment plants and livestock wastes, in
fuel cells is  possible as a result of the work performed using LFG as a fuel.
17.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                                           b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                          c, COSATI Field/Group
Pollution
Fuel Cells
Earth Fills
Phosphoric Acids
Exhaust Gases
                 Pollution Prevention
                 Stationary Sources
                 Landfill Gas
13 B
10 B
13 C
07B
21B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
 Release to Public
                                           19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                                           Unclassified
                                                                    21. NO. OF PAGES
                 20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage}
                 Unclassified
                                          22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------