STATIONARY SOURCE TESTING OF A COUNTRY GRAIN ELEVATOR
at
The Great Bend Cooperative Association
Elevator B
Great Bend, Kansas
by
William H. Maxwell
Midwest Research Institute
FINAL REPORT
April 29, 1976
EPA Contract No. 68-02-1403
MRI Project No. 3927-C(19)
For
National Air Data Branch
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Attn: Mr. Thomas F. Lahre

-------
Background Report Reference
AP-42 Section Number: 9.9.1
Background Report Section: 4
Reference Number:	23
Title:	Stationary Source Testing of a Country
Grain Evaluator at The Great Bend
Cooperative Association Elevator B,
Great Bend, Kansas
Midwest Research Institute

-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by Midwest Research In-
stitute (MRI) under Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contract No.
68-02-1403, Task No. 19.
The project was under the technical supervision of Mr. Paul C.
Constant, Jr., Head, Environmental Measurements Section of the Physical
Sciences Division. Mr. William H. Maxwell served as crew chief and was
assisted by Mr. Thomas Merrifield. The analysis of the samples was done
by Ms. Carol Green. Mr. Thomas Merrifield was responsible for the data
reduction and computer analysis.
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Constant, Jr
Program Manager
Approved:
L. J.( Shannon, Assistant Director
Physical Sciences Division

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I* Introduction	1
II* Summary and Discussion of Results- 			1
A* Soybeans. 			1
B.	Wheat		4
C.	Corn. 					8
D.	Milo		8
III. Process Description and Operation. ... 		13
A.	Process Description 		13
B.	Process Operation			15
IV* Location of Sample Points		21
V* Sampling and Analytical Procedures 		21
Appendix A - Results of Analysis - Printout of Computer
Computations			23
Appendix B - Sample Calculations	*		52
List of Figures
Figure Title	Page
1	Schematic of Process Operation—Great Bend, Kansas,
Cooperative Association, Elevator B	 *	14
2	Schematic of Sampling Site—Load-Out ..........	16
3	Schematic of Sampling Site—Tunnel Belt			17
4	Schematic of Sampling Site—Bin Vent		18

-------
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
2
3
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
19
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
List of Tables
Title
Summary of Emission Factors and Approximate Catch
Size Fractions . . . . * 	
Summary of Particulate Results - Soybeans	
Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
Filter (Soybeans)* ........ 	 ...
Summary of Particulate Results - Wheat 	
Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
Filter (Wheat) ... 	
Summary of Particulate Results - Corn	
Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
Filter (Corn)			
Summary of Particulate Results - Milo. .... 	
Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
Filter (Milo). ............ 	
Summary of Grain Data Versus Sampling Time 	
Location of Sample Points	
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 1-LOS • • •
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 2-LOS • • •
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 3-LOW . • .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 4-TBW . • .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 5-BVW . . .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 6-LOW . . .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 7-BVW • . .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 8-TBC . . .
Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 9-TBC . . .

-------
List of Tables (Concluded)
Table Title	Page
A-10	Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 10-TBM • . «	33
A-ll	Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 11-BVM • • .	34
A-12	Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 12-TBM • • •	35
A-13	Particulate Bnission Data			36
A-14	Particulate Emission Data (Metric Results). 		40
A-15	Summary of Results			. . .	44
A-16	Summary of Results—Metric Units# 			48

-------
I, INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of source testing performed dur-
ing the period October 29 to 31, 1975, by Midwest Research Institute (MRI)
on three activities of the Great Bend Cooperative Association, Elevator B,
at Great Bend, Kansas- Testing for particulate emissions was conducted on
the ducts of the dust emission handling system during periods of grain
load-out, bin transfer, and bin loading (venting), all batch or semicontin-
uous processes.
All tests were conducted on the ducts prior to the cyclone con-
trol device. Tests were conducted in accordance with the Federal Register
Vol. 36, No. 247, Part II, December 23, 1971, except as may be defined
later in this report.
The following sections of this report present:
1.	The summary and discussion of results;
2.	The process description and operation!
3.	The location of the sampling points; and
4.	The sampling and analytical procedures.
II- SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Table 1 presents a summary of the emission factors and approxi-
mate catch size fractions for all of the tests.
A. Soybeans
Table 2 presents a summary of the particulate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust-handling system during soy-
bean load-out. Data are given only for the "front half" of the sampling
train as specified in the referenced Federal Register and in the task or-
der. These data are presented as grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/
dscf), milligrams per normal cubic meter (mg/ncm), pounds per hour (lb/hr),
kilograms per hour (kg/hr), pounds emissions per ton grain handled (lb/ton),
and kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled (kg/Mton). Computer
printouts of the field data and reductions are found in Appendix A. Sample
calculations are found in Appendix B.

-------
table i
SUMMARY OF EHISSION FACTORS AND APPROXIMATE CATCH SIZE FRACTIONS
Grain
Soybean*
Wheat
Corn
Hilo
Run*
a
1-LOS
2-LOS
3-LOW
4-TBW
5-BVW
6-LOW
7-BVW
8-TBC
9-TBC
10-TBM
11-BVM
12-TBM
Load-Out•
Eolation
lb/ton£/ *"
3.40
2.05
0.77
0.58
factor
kg/Hton^
1.70
1.03
o.sa
0.29
Approximate
Percent Catch
> i |i
96
97
97
97
Tunnel Belt
y
Emission Factor
1T~
fc«/H tot&f
0.37
0.89
0.92
0.5B
0.68
0.18
0.45
0.46
0.29
0.34
Approximate
Percent Catch
> 5 y
97
99
99
99
99
Bin Vinf
Ealtslon Factor
Ib/tonS' hg/W Etftr'
0.02
0.02
0.03
7
0.01
0.01
0.02
Approxiaata
Percent Catch
> 5 |i
85
79
90
Soybeans
Wheat
Corn
Mllo
Average
Average
Average
Average
2.72
0.68
1.36
0.34
96
97
0.37
0.91
0.63
0.18
0.45
0.32
97
99
99
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
83
90
jj Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, leg boots, and grain scale.
J)/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg crosi belt, and leg boot.
c! Bin vent only; grain scale bin for wheat t standard bin for alio.
_d/ LQ- ™ Load-out
_-TB_ = Tunnel belt (Bin transfer)
BV_ ¦= Bin vent
S = Soybeans
U = Wheat
- t C = Corn
	M = Hilo
_e/ lb/ton = Founds etilsslons per ton grain handled.

-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS - SOYBEANS
Particulate Load	Emission Factor
Run	Date	gr/dsc£g/	rog/nemg/	lb/hr£/	kft/hrj|/	lb/tori^/	kR/Mtor\£/
b/
Load-Out
1-LOS	October 29	4,691	10,700	340	154	3.40	1.70
2-LOS	October 29	2.886	6,600	205	93	2,05	1.03
Average 3.789 8,670 272 124 2.72 1.36
aj gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
mg/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
Ib/hr = Pounds per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
lb/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled

-------
Sampling volumes were 31>42 dscf (0.89 ncm) and 30,72 dscf (0.87
nam)• Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate were 98.5 and 98.6.
As no combustion was involved, no Orsat analyses were performed
on the gas stream. Ambient air values of 20.9% oxygen, 79.1% nitrogen,
and 0.07, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide were used for the gas stream
composition. Percent moisture determinations were obtained using a sling
psychrometer and a psychrometric chart. The value for the volume of water
collected needed for entry into the computer program was back-calculated
from this percent moisture value using the standard equation. The moisture
percentage used was 0.6% for both runs.
Table 3 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of mate-
rial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the approx-
imate size fraction this weight represents. Information obtained from the
Research Appliance Company indicates that the cyclone will retain particles
greater than 5 \l diameter, irrespective of flow rate. From this information,
it appears that approximately 96% of the material collected during the load-
out tests is of size greater than 5 ji.
B. Wheat
Table 4 presents a summary of the particulate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust handling system during wheat
load-out, tunnel belt, and bin venting operations. Data are presented as
for soybeans. Computer printouts of the field data and reductions are
found in Appendix A. Sample calculations are found in Appendix B.
Sampling volumes ranged from 20.41 dscf (0.58 ncm) to 47.96 dscf
(1.36 nan). Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate varied from
97.7 to 99.5.
Again, no Orsat values were obtained, ambient air composition
values being used as before. Percent moisture values, as obtained for soy-
beans, ranged from 0.8 to 1.3%.
Table 5 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of mate-
rial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the approx-
imate size fraction this weight represents. It appears that approximately
97% of the material collected during the load-out tests, 97% of the material
collected during the bin transfer test, and 83% of the material collected
during the bin vent tests is of size greater than 5 p..

-------
TABLE 3
APPROXIMATE PARTICULATE CATCH - PROBE-CYCLONE VERSUS FILTER (SOYBEANS)
Run
1-LOS
2-LOS
Date
Load-Out
b/
October 29
October 29
Probe-Cyclone
(mR) > 5
Average
9,149
5,584
7,366
Filter (rag)
<5 |i. > 0.3
422
173
297
Probe-Cyclone
Versus Total
	
96
97
96
_a/ Size fraction information obtained from Research Appliance Company,
b/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, leg boots, and

-------

SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS - WHEAT
Run	Date
b/
Load-Out
3-LOW	October 29
6-LOW
October 31
Average
gr/dscfg/
1.040
0.849
0.944
Particulate Load
mg/nenffi/	kg/hr£/
2,380
1,940
2,160
76.6
58.3
67.7
34.7
26.7
30.7
Emission Factor
lb/too£^
0.766
0.583
0.677
kfi/Mtong/
0.383
0.292
0.338
Tunnel Belt

4-TBW
October 29
Average
Bin Vent
dl
5-BVW
7-BVW
October 30
October 31
Average
0.587
0.587
0.469
0.674
0,572
1,340
1,340
1,070
1,540
1,300
43.9
43.9
1.5
2.1
1.8
19.9
19.9
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.366
0.366
0.015
0.021
0.018
0.183
0.183
0.008
0.011
0.009
a/ gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
mg/ncra = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
lb/hr = Pounds per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
lb/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled,
b/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, leg boots, and grain scale,
e/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, and leg boot.

-------
TABLE 5
APPROXIMATE PARTICULATE GATGH - PROBE-CYCLONE VERSUS FILTER (WHEAT)
Run
3-LOW
6-LOW
4-TBW
5-BVW
7-BVW
Date
Load-Out
b/
October 29
October 31
Average
Tunnel Belt'
c/
October 29
Average
Bin Vent
d /
October 30
October 31
Probe-Cyclone
(mfi) > 5 ^
2,080
1,597
1,838
1,192
1.192
Average
1,239
706
972
Filter (mg)
a/
< 5 > 0.3
74
43
58
39
39
222
186
205
Probe-Cyclone
Versus Total
(%)
97
97
97
97
97
85
79
83
_a/	Size fraction information obtained from Research Appliance Company.
b/	Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, leg boots, and grain scale.
cf	Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, and leg boot

-------
C.	Com
Table 6 presents a summary of the particulate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the duct-handling system during corn
bin transfer# Data are presented as for soybeans. Computer printouts of
the field data and reductions are found in Appendix A. Sample calculations
are found in Appendix B.
Sampling volumes were 28.09 dscf (0.80 ncm) and 29.51 dscf (0.84
ncm). Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate were 97.9 and 97.8.
Ambient air composition values were again used, and the percent
moisture values were 1.5 and 1.27. for the first and second runs, respec-
tively.
Table 7 presents the approximate breakdown of the weight of ma-
terial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the ap-
proximate size fraction this weight represents. It appears that approxi-
mately 997. of the material collected during the bin transfer tests is of
size greater than 5 ^l.
D.	Milo
Table 8 presents a summary of the particulate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust-handling system during milo
(grain sorghum) tunnel belt and bin venting operations. Data are presented
as for soybeans. Computer printouts of the field data and reductions are
found in Appendix A. Sample calculations are found in Appendix B.
Sampling volumes ranged from 17.18 dscf (0.49 ncm) to 28.93 dscf
(0.82 ncm). Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate ranged from
98.0 to 99.0.
Ambient air composition values were again used and the percent
moisture values ranged from 1.2 to 1.7%.
Table 9 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of ma-
terial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the ap-
proximate size fraction this weight represents. It appears that approxi-
mately 99 and 90£ of the material collected during the tunnel belt and
bin vent tests, respectively, is of size greater than 5 p,.

-------
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS - CORN
_______	Particulate Load	Emission Factor
Run	Date	gr/dscfg/	m^/ncms/	lb/hri!/	kg/hrJ/	lb/to	kR/Mton^"
h!
Tunnel Belt
8-TBC	October 31	1.644	3,760	107	48.7	0.892	0.446
9-TBC	October 31	1.602	3,660	HO	49.9	0.917	0.459
Average 1.623 3,710 109 49.3 0.908 0.454
a/ gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
mg/ncm ~ Milligrams per normal cubic meter
lb/hr = Pounds per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
lb/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled

-------
TABLE 7
o
APPROXIMATE PARTICULATE CATCH - PROBE-CYCLONE VERSUS FILTER (CORN)
Probe-Cyclone
Probe-Cyclone Filter (mg)	Versus Total
Run Date (ma) > 5 <5 p, > 0.3 yS-f	(%)
Tunnel Beltr^
8-TBC	October 31 2,982 17	99
9-TBC	October 31 3,051 19	99
Average 3,016 18	99
aj Size fraction information obtained from Research Appliance Company.

-------
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS - HI LP
Particulate	Load Emission Factor
Run Date gr/dsc£f/ mg/ncrng./	Ib/hrjj/ kg/ hrjj/ Ib/ton£^	kg/Mtoaj^
Tunnel Belt~^
10-TBM	October 31 1.043 2,390	70.1 31.8 0.584	0.292
12-TBM October 31 1.244 2,850	81.9 37.1 0.683 0.341
Average 1.144 2,620	76.0 34.5 0.633	0.317
c/
Bin Vent""
11-BVM	October 31 0.727 1,660	4.0 1.8 0.033	0.017
Average 0.727 1,660	4.0 1.8 0.033 0.017
a/ gr/dscf = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
mg/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
lb/hr = Pounds per hour
kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
lb/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled
b/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, and leg boot,

-------
TABLE 9
APPROXIMATE PARTICULATE CATCH - PRO BE-.CYCLONE VERSUS FILTER (MI LP)
Run
Date
Tunnel Belt'
bl
10-TBM
12-TBM
October 31
October 31
Average
Probe-Cyclone
(nag) > 5
1,946
2,270
2,108
Filter (mg)
<5 p. > 0.3 \£'
H
20
17
Probe-Cyclone
Versus Total
ft)
99
99
99
G	Bin Vent"7
ll-BVM	October 31	733	78	90
Average	733	78	90
a/ Size fraction information obtained from Research Appliance Company.
t)/ Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, and leg boot.

-------
Ill* PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
The Great Bend Cooperative Association1s Elevator B operates as
a typical country grain elevator. It has a storage capacity of 570,000
bushels of grain. The agricultural area that the elevator serves primarily
grows four grain crops: wheat, rnilo (grain sorghum), soybeans, and corn.
A. Process Description
The elevator receives grain direct from the farmer and immediately
transfers it into bins. The grain may be held in storage for the farmer or
processed for sale and shipment to a feed mill, grain mill, or terminal ele-
vator. The grain may be dried at the elevator if wet, or handled as received.
It also may be treated chemically if wet or to control insects.
A schematic diagram of the operation of Elevator B is shown in
Figure 1. The grain is transported by the farmer to the elevator and dumped
into the truck dump hopper. The elevator legs transport the grain to the
headhouse where it is distributed into one of the several bins. Grain may
also be circulated from bin to bin during treatment or cooling operations
utilizing the tunnel belts and elevator legs.
Most grain handling activities are connected to the dust emission
control system, thought by elevator personnel to have been constructed in
the mid-19401s. All dust collection points are ducted to a common duct run-
ning from the basement area to the cyclone on the roof.
The ducting begins at the far aids of the tunnel belts with small
hoods serving the belt pulleys. The ducts run the length of the tunnel belts
to the center of the elevator building. Along this length, ducts serving the
small dust hoods at each bin tunnel belt drop point join the common duct at
intervals. At the center of the elevator building, ducts serving the eleva-
tor leg boots, leg cross belt, belt pulleys, and grain scale join the common
duct. The dust duct then runs up the building wall to the fan at the elevator
leg head level. Just below, at the gallery belt level, further ducting joins
the system. Two ducts begin at the far end of the gallery belts at the pulley
hoods. Running the length of the gallery, they are joined by the bin vent
ducts at intervals. The bin vents are ducts inserted into the bin near the
grain entry hole, flush with the bin roof. Other ducts serving the elevator
leg transfer points (gallery belt hoods) also meet the common duct at this
point. Just before the fan, the duct serving the one controlled elevator
leg head joins the system. From the fan, the dust control ducting is di-
rected to two cyclones in parallel. However, as one cyclone is almost com-
pletely filled with dust, essentially only one cyclone is in operation.
The collected dust is trucked to landfill but Is not weighed or estimated
as to amount.

-------
Atmosphere
Load-Out
to Rail Cars
Grain
Truck Dump
Hopper
Cyclone
(2)
a
Grain
Scale
I
Sompling
Sites
Dust
Gallery Belt (2)
r~~*
'd
i

/ /
/ 1
/ /
/ /
• f 1
Bins


Grain
a



Dust
Tunnel Belt (2)

Figure 1 - Schematic of Process Operation—Great Bend, Kansas,
Cooperative Association, Elevator B

-------
The dust control fan is run at all times that grain handling is
taking place. Each separate duct is equipped with a slide valve so that
those ducts serving inactive operations may be closed off, providing ade-
quate air flow for active operations.
B. Process Operation
The purpose of the tests was to measure uncontrolled emission
levels during normal elevator operation and use these data to compute un-
controlled emission factors. Standard operation of the elevator is to give
priority to grain load-out operations over grain turning or treating. Load-
out operations involve the tunnel belt, leg cross belt, two of the three
elevator legs, and the grain scale. The third elevator leg may be used to
handle grain received by the elevator from farmers, if necessary. After
load-out, the tunnel belt, leg cross belt, one elevator leg, and gallery
belt may be used for grain turning (bin transfer) used to treat, aerate,
or cool stored grain.
This priority system was followed during the test series. No
grain was received during load-out tests. Every effort was made to have
open only those ducts serving active operations. The dust ducts used dur-
ing load-out tests were those controlling the bin tunnel belt drop point,
tunnel belt pulleys, elevator xeg boots, leg cross belt, and grain scale.
Those used for the tunnel belt (bin transfer) tests were the same with
the exclusion of one elevator leg boot and the grain scale. The bin vent
tests involved only that vent serving the bin being filled. Figures 2, 3,
and 4 show schematics of these operations. Note that neither the load-out
nor the bin transfer tests included either the leg transfer points (gal-
lery belt hoods) or lone leg head duct that are shown meeting the common
duct above the sampling sites in Figure 1.
Grain handling rates were obtained from elevator personnel. These
were approximately 200,000 lb/hr (90,720 kg/hr) for load-out operations and
240,000 lb/hr (108,860 kg/hr) for bin transfer operations. Table 10 presents
a summary of the grain data versus the sampling periods.
Cursory observation of the dust emission control system indicates
a fairly good capture efficiency. The hoods seem to trap most of the dust
with little entrainment of grain. No observations could be made on the
closed systems, such as the elevator leg, boots and heads.

-------
To Cyclone
Building
Woll
Fan
b. Elevation
East
Port
Sampling
Ports —=
North
Port
23-3/4" ID
North
Grain
Scale
Building Wall
Grain
Bins
U-
Not to Scale
Dust Control
System Duct
Slide Valve
Kj
Tunnel Belt Drop Point
Tunnel Belt
Cross Belt
— Elevator Leg
Tunnel Belt
Pulley

-------
a. PI
an
To Cyclone
Sampling
Ports
23-3/4" ID
b. Elevation
A
Building Wa
Grain
North
Port
Building
Wall
North
Not to Scale
Dust Control


Tunnel Belt Drop Point
4f-s	
¦Cross Belt
Elevator Leg
>—Tunnel Belt—"'
£—1-_	1 f-
Slide Valve
Figure 3 - Schematic of Sampling Sice—Tunnel Belt
Tunnel Belt
' Pulley

-------
Gallery Roof
Air Flow
6" ID
Grain
Distributer
Sampling
Port
Gallery
Belt
Valve
Diitribufar ^
Rai
Not to Scale
Gallery Belt
Pulley
a. Standard Bin
Slide _
Velvet
4" (CM
Ta Fan &
f	Cyclone
ikC
Sampling
-f^Port
o r -i-
Grain
~4<
Duir
Bin
b. Grain Seal* Bin
Figure 4 - Schematic of Sampling Site—Bin Vent

-------
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF GRAIN DATA VERSUS SAMPLING TIME
Sampling
Run	Date
Soybeans: Load-Out
1-LOS October 29
2-LOS October 29
Time
0929-0959
1004-1034
1054-1124
1127-1157
Duration
(roin)
30
30
60
30
30
60
Grain Weight
lb
100,000
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)
100,000
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)

45,360
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
45,360
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
Wheat: Load-Out
3-LOW October 29
6-L0W October 31
1535-1605
1609-1639
0903-0933
0937-1007
30
30
60
30
30
60
100,000
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)
100,000
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)
45,360
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
45,360
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
Wheat: Tunnel Belt
4-TBW October 29
1653-1723
1727-1757
30
30
60
120,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
54,430
54,430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)
Wheat: Bin Vent
5-BVW
October 30
0902-0932
0937-1007
30
30
60
100,000
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)
45,360
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)

-------
TABLE 10 (Concluded)
Run
Date
7-BVW October 31
Sampling
Time
0902-0907
0918-0943
0949-1019
Duration
(min)
5
25
30
60
Grain Weight
lb
16,667
83,333
100,000
200,000
(100 tons)
kg
7,560
37,800
45,360
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
Corn; Tunnel Belt
8-TBC October 31
1200-1205
1235-1300
1305-1335
5
25
30
60
20,000
100,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
9,070
45,360
54,430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)
9-TBC October 31
1349-1419
1422-1452
30
30
60
120,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
54,430
54,430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)
Milo: Tunnel Belt
10-TBM October 31
12-TBM October 31
1515-1545
1549-1619
1645-1715
1719-1749
30
30
60
30
30
60
120,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
120,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
54,430
54,430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)
54,430
54^430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)
Milo: Bin Vent
11-BVM October 31
1527-1557
1603-1633
30
30
60
120,000
120,000
240,000
(120 tons)
54,430
54,430
108,860
(108.9 Mtons)

-------
IV. LOCATION OF SAMPLE POINTS
Figures 2 and 3 show a schematic of the load-out and tunnel belt
sampling sites, respectively. Figure 4 presents a similar layout for the
bin vent system. The location of the sampling sites was in accordance with
Federal Register guidelines.
Table 11 presents the sampling point locations for the ducts.
V. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Particulate samples were taken with Research Appliance Company
Model 2243 "Stacksamplr" equipment, modified by MRI. Sampling train speci-
fications were in compliance with the Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 247,
Part II, December 23, 1971.
A preliminary velocity traverse was made for each duct. A stain-
less steel probe liner was used for all tests. Since the gas stream was
ambient air at near ambient temperature, no probe or filter heaters were
used *
Due to space limitations on the bin vent ducts, a right-angle,
stainless steel extension was made for use on one traverse. As the bin
vent ducts were of small diameter, velocity traverses were taken separately
prior to the sampling traverses for each traverse in order to lessen the
flow disturbances possible from the large pitob in the small duct.
Sampling times were chosen as 1 hr upon the request and approval
of the project monitor. Five-minute sample times per point were used on
the load-out and tunnel belt tests while 7-1/2 min sample times per point
were used on the bin vent tests.
As has been mentioned previously in the report, percent moisture
values for the gas stream were obtained using a sling psychroraeter and a
psychrometric chart. The gas composition of the stream was taken to be that
of ambient air.
Analysis of the samples was in compliance with the referenced
Federal Register.

-------
TABLE 11
LOCATION OF SAMPLE POINTS
Load-Out and Tunnel Belt
Duct ID = 23.75 in.
Fraction of
Duct ID
Point	(7.)
1	4.4
2	14.7
3	29.5
4	70.5
5	85.3
6	95.6
Distance From
Inside Wall
(in.)
1-0
3-1/2
7-0
16-3/4
20-1/4
22-3/4
Bin Vent (Wheat)
Duct ID = 4.0 in.
1	6.7
2	25.0
3	75.0
4	93.3
Bin Vent	(Milo)
Duct ID	5.875 in.
1	6.7
2	25.0
3	75.0
4	93.3
1-0
1-1/4
2-3/4
3-0
1-0
1-1/2
4-3/8
4-7/8

-------
APPENDIX A
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS - PRINTOUT OF COMPUTER COMPUTATIONS

-------
TABLE A-I
particulate data and calculated values



RUN
1-LOS
DATE-
10-29-
Th




ATMQS
TEMP
i r>6» f I
ATMOS
PRES
II.HG)
STACK
VAC
(I.H20)
HJO
COND
(ml)
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG J
PARTIC
KT-TTL
IMG)
STACK
AMEA
(FT?)
INIT
VOL
(DCF)
PERC
02
DRV
PERC
C02
DRY
PERC
CO
DRY
PI TOT
TUBE
COEF
50 • 0
28.44
-3.90
4.0
9570,00
9570.00
3.08
322.24
20^9
0.0
0.0
.74*
PORT-
SAMP
METER
delta
delta
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S.GEL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
vot
P
H
IN
OUT
VAC
TEMP
TEMP
T DIA
VEL


(WIN)
IDCF) (I
.H20)
O
X
•
*4
(D.F)
(O.F)
II.HG)
(D.F)
(O.F)
(IN)
IF- •»•»)
N
1
5.00
324.59
.660
.940
48.0
48.0
2.5
45.0
50.0
• 188
2429,0
M
2
5.00
326.75
• 560
.800
54.0
49.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
• 188
2239.6
N
3
5.00
329.27
.680
.970
60.0
50.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
.188
2468.0
N
4
5.00
332.27
1.100
1.550
68.0
52.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
.188
313R.9
M
5
5.00
335.22
1.000
1.420
76.0
54.0
2.5
46,0
50.0
.188
2992.8
N
6
5.00
337.96
.910
1.300
76.0
56.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
• 188
2855,n
e.
1
5.00
340.9B
.980
1.400
76.0
60,0
2.5
46.0
50.0
.168
2962.8
¥.
2
5.00
343.68
• 700
1.000
76.0
62.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
. iaa
2504.0
E
3
5,00
346.04
.730
1.050
76.0
62.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
.188
2557.1
E
4
5.00
348.78
.970
1.300
78.0
64.0
2.5
46.0
50*0
.188
2947.6
E
5
5.00
351.99
1.000
1.420
80.0
66.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
.188
2992.8
f;
6
5.00
354.83
.940
1.350
84.0
66.0
2.5
46.0
50.0
• 188

-------
TABLE A-2
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
NUN- 2-l.OS fifiTE- in-29-75
ATMOS	ATMOS STACK	H?0	PARTIC	PARTIC	STACK	IMT
TEMP	PRES VhC	COND	WT-PTL	WT-TTL	AREA	VOL
CD6.FI	(I .HG)	(I.H20I	(ML I	
-------
TABLE A-3
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
HUN- 3-1 ON DATE- 10-29-75
ATMOS
ATMOS
STAC*
HJ0
PARTIC
PARTIC
STACK
INIT
PEHC
PERC
PERC
PITOT
TEMP
PRES
VAC
COND
WT-PTL
WT-TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02
CO
TUBf
(DG.F)
(I.HG)
(I
(ML)
(NG1
(HG)
(FT?)
(DCF)
DRY
DRY
DRY
COEF
61.0
28.40
-3.90
5.4
2153.60
2153.bO
3.08
387.41
20.9
0.0
0.0
.74*
PORT

samp
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S.-EL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VOL
P
N
IN
OUT
V*C
TEMP
TEMP
T DlA
VEl.


(NIN)
(OrF) (I
• H20)
(I.H20)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(I.HG)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(FMM )
N
1
5.00
390.24
.940
1.350
62.0
62 . 0
2.5
58.0
60.0
.188
2939.0
N
2
5.00
392.30
.550
.800
64.0
64.0
2.5
60.0
60.0
.188
2252.4
N
3
5.00
394.84
.810
1.190
70.0
64.0
2.5
60.0
60.0
.188
2733.5
N
4
5.00
397.99
1.000
1.410
76.0
65.0
2.0
60.0
60.0
.188
3037.2
M
5
5.00
400.96
.990
1.400
81. 0
67.0
2.0
61.0
60.0
.188
3024.9
N
6
5.00
403.75
.870
1.250
86.0
70.0
2.5
61.0
60.0
.188
2B35.6
F
1
5.00
406.43
.620
1.180
88.0
72.0
2.0
61.0
60.0
.188
2752.9
F
2
5.00
40ft.91
.710
1.030
90.0
74.0
2.0
62.0
60.0
.188
2564.1
E
3
5.00
411.98
.910
1.300
93.0
76.0
2.5
62.0
60.0
.188
2902.9
E
4
5.00
415.16
1.100
1.560
98.0
8.0
3.0
62.0
60.0
.188
3191.6
F
5
5.00
418.35
1.200
1.700
100.0
80.0
4.0
63.0
60.0
.108
3336.7
E
6
5.00
421.40
1.000
1.410
104,0
ri2. 0
2.5
63.0
60.0
.188
3045.9
-------
TABLE A-4
particulate oata and calculated values
*UN-
4-TBW i) TE- 10-20-75
K>
ATMOS
ATMOS
STACK
H?0
PARTIC
PARTIC
STACK
INIT
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
TEMP
PRES
VaC
COND
KT-PTL
WT-
TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02 CO TUBE
(DG.
F)
U.HG)
(I.H^O)
(ML)
(MG)
(MG)
(FT?)
(DCF)
DRY
DRY DRY TOEF
61,
0
28.35
-3.90
5. 5
1230.40
1230
.40
3,08
421.40
20.9
0.0 0.0 .
746
PORT-
samp
METER
DELTA
delta
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S.GEL
PROBE


POINT
TIME
VOl.
p
H
IN
OUT
VrtC
TEMP
TEMP
T DU
VEI



(MlNi
(Dr F J (1
• H20)
(I.H20)
(O.F)
(D.F)
(I.HG)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(FPHl
E
1
5.00
424.18
.850
1.200
86.0
61.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2813,
4
E
2
5.00
426.73
.710
1.020
88.0
81.0
2.0
64.0
53.0
.188
2571.
3
E
3
5.00
429.60
.870
1.250
94.0
82.0
2.5
64.0
53,0
.188
2846.
3
E
4
5.00
432.84
1.200
1.700
98.0
83.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
3342.
8
F.
5
5.00
436.05
1.100
1.570
102.0
84.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
3200.
5
h
6
5.00
438.95
.930
1.330
103.0
84.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2942.
8
N
1
5.00
442.27
1.200
1,700
100.0
84.0
2.5
63.0
53.0
.188
3339.
6
N
2
5.00
444.88
.700
1.000
101.0
86.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2553.
1
N
3
5.00
447.86
.920
1.300
104.0
86,0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2926.
9
N
4
5.00
450.95
.990
1.400
106.0
86.0
2.5
65.0
53.0
.188
3039.
1
N
5
5.00
453.86
.960
1.370
102.0
86.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2989.
9
N
6
5.00
456.72
.850
1.220
105.0
87.0
2.5
64.0
53.0
.188
2813.
-------
TABLE A-5
particulate data and calculated values
*Ui - 5-BVW DfTE- 10-30-75
ATMOS
ATMOS
STACK
H?0
PARTIC
PARTIC
STACK
IhIT
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
TEMP
PRES
VAC
COND
WT-PTL
WT-
TTL
APEA
VOL
02
C02
CO TUBE
IDG.
Fi
CI.MG)
(I.H20)
CML )
(MG)
(MG)
(FT?)
CDCFI
DRY
DRY
PRY CHEF
55*
0
28.17
-2.60
9.2
1460.80
1460
.80
.09
140.10
20.9
0,0
0.0 .838
PORT-
SAMP
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S.GEL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
vot
P
H
IN
OUT
V*C
TEMP
TEMP
T DIA
VEI


(MINI
(Don (i
.H20»
CI.H201
(D.F 1
CO.F 1
(I.HG)
ID.F)
(O.F)
(IN)
(F»v)
e
1
5.00
144.22
1.600
2.300
54.0
52.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
4307.6
t
1
2.50
146.29
1.600
2.300
61.0
52.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.168
4307.6
E
2
2.50
148.35
1.600
2.300
66.0
53.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
4307.6
t
2
5.00
152.57
1.600
2.300
70.0
53.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
. 188
4307.6
K
3
5.00
156.42
1.500
2.100
78.0
56.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
4170.8
£
3
2.50
15R.40
1.500
2.100
82.0
50.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
<170.8
F
4
2.50
160.50
1.500
2.100
86.0
60.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
4170.8
E
4
5.00
164.S2
1.500
2.100
87.0
61.0
5.0
52.0
50.0
.188
41^0.8
H
1
5.00
169.30
1.700
2.400
82.0
64.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4474.7
N
1
2.50
171.46
1.700
2.400
88.0
66.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4474.7
N
2
2.50
173.59
1.600
2.300
92.0
67.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4341.1
N
2
5.00
177.93
1.600
2.300
94.0
68,0
5. 0
60.0
50.0
.188
4341.1
N
3
5.00
182.30
1.600
2.300
98.0
70.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4341.1
N
3
2.50
184.48
1.600
2.300
100.0
72.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4341.1
N
4
2.50
186.65
1.600
2.300
102.0
74.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
4341.1
H
4
5.00
191.03
1.600
2.300
102.0
74.0
5.0
60.0
50.0
.188
-------
TABLE A-6
particulate data and calculated values



HU? - 6-1. OW
PftTE-
1 fl-31-76




ATMOS
ATMOS
STACK
M^O PART IC
PARTIC
STACK
INIT
PERC
PERC
PERC
TEMP
PRES
VAC
COND KT-PTL
WT-TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02
CO
(DQ.F)
II.HG)
(I.H?0)
(ML) (MG)
(MGI
1F T ^ 1
(DCF)
ORY
DRY
DRY
61,0
27.74
-3.90
8.3 1639.90
1639.90
3.08
456.73
20.9
0.0
0.0
TUBE
noEF
PORT-
samp
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STAC/
S .GEL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VOi
P
M
IN
OUT
VAC
TEMP
TEMP
T 01 A
VE<


(HIN)
f 0«' F > (
I.H20)
(1.H201
(D.F)
(D.F)
(I.HG)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(F P' * >
N
1
5.00
459.99
.610
• 880
60.0
60.0
2.0
62.0
51.0
• 188
2406.8
N
2
5.00
461.42
.710
1.010
62,0
60.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
.188
2599.1
N
3
5.00
464.00
.^00
1.270
66.0
62.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
. 188
2-26.3
N
4
5.00
466.83
1.000
1.410
73.0
63.0
?.o
63.0
51.0
.188
3084.6
N
5
5.00
469.64
.930
1.300
80.0
65. 0
2.0
63.0
51.0
• 188
2974.6
U
6
5.00
472.51
.830
1.200
84.0
68.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
• 188
2810.?
e
1
5.00
474.78
.580
.840
78,0
70.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
* ,180
2349.1
E
2
5.00
477.26
.720
1.030
85.0
72.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
.188
2617.3
I
3
5.00
480.09
.870
1.250
88.0
7.1.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
.188
2877.1
E
4
5.00
483.09
1.100
1.570
91.0
75.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
.188
3235.1
f
5
5.00
4H6.25
.950
1.360
95,0
76.0
2.0
63.0
SI. 0
.188
3006.5
E
6
5.00
488.98
.790
1.120
96.0
78.0
2.0
63.0
51.0
.188
-------
• F)
.0
RT-
INT
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
TABLE A-7
PARTICULATE data and calculated values
NUr7-8VW Date- 19-31-75
ATMOS
STACK
H/'O
PARTIC
PARTIC !
STACK
INIT
PERC PEHC PERC PITOT
PRES
VAC
COND
yT-PTL
WT-
TTL
AWEA
VOL
02
€02 CO TUBF
I .H6I
(I .M

{FT?)
(Df.FI
DRY
DRY DRV CUFF
27,74
-2.60
-..7
893.10
893
.10
o
.
191.03
20.9
o
•
o
o
i.O ,H38
SAMP
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S .GEL
PHOBE

TIME
VOl.
P
H
IN
OUT
VAC
TEMP
TEMP
T 014
VEI
MIN)
(DCF1 (I
. H20)
CI.H20)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(I.H6)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(FPn)
5,00
192.82
1.500
.360
61.0
60.0
1.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
2.50
193.82
1.500
,360
64.0
60.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
2.50
194.56
1.500
.400
65.0
61,0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
5.00
196.30
1.500
.400
67.0
61.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
. 125
4267.2
5.00
198,30
1.600
.440
72.0
62.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4407.1
2.50
199.18
1.600
.440
76.0
64.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4407.1
2.50
200.18
1.700
.460
78.0
65.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4542,8
5.00
202.09
1.700
.460
Kl.O
67.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4542,f
5.00
204.16
1.500
.460
77.0
69.0
1.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
2.50
204.86
1.500
.400
ai.o
70.0
1.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
2.50
205.80
1.500
.400
81.0
71.0
1.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
5.00
207.57
1.500
.400
82.0
72.0
1.0
67.0
50.0
,125
4267.2
5.00
20 .45
1.500
.400
86.0
74.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
2.50
210.34
1.500
.400
87.0
74.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
,125
4267.2
2.50
211.29
1.500
.400
88.0
75.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
4267.2
5.00
213.11
1.500
.400
09.0
75.0
2.0
67.0
50.0
.125
-------
TABLE A-8
particulate data and calculated values
RUn- e-TBC -ate- 10-31-75
ATMOS
ATMOS
STACK
H?J0
PARTIC
PARTIC !
^TACK
IHIT
PERC PERC PERC PlTOT
TEMP
PRES
VftC
CONO
wt-ptl
WT-
TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02 CO TUBE
(DG.
fi
(I.HG)
(I.H20)
(ML 1
(MG)
(MG)
(FT^J
k(DCF)
DRY
DRY DRY COEF
65.
0
27.71
-3.90
9.0
2998.90
2998
.90
3.08
488.98
20.9
0.0 0
.0 .74?,
PORT-
SAMP
meter
DELTA
delta
TEMP
TEMP
train
STACK
S.6EL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VO|
P

IN
OUT
v&e
TEMP
TEMP
T DIA
ve i


CHIN)
(0
-------
TABLE A-9
particulate data and calculated values
I
wusi- 9-Tsc date- 10-31-75
ATMOS
ATMOS
STACK
H?0
PARTIC
PARTIC
STACK
INIT
PERC
PERC
PERC
PITOT
TENP
PRES
VAC
CONf»
WT-PTL
WT-TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02
CO
TUBf
(DG.FI
(I,HG)
(I.H20)
(Mli
(MG)
(MO)
(rm
CDCFJ
DRY
ORY
DRY
r.oEF
65.0
2T.71
-3.90
7.5
3069.30
3069.30
3.08
519.84
20.9
0.0
0.0
.746
PORT-
SAMP
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAI
STACK
S.GEL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VOL
P
H
IN
OUT
VtC
TEMP
TEMP
T 01A
vEl.


(MINI
(Dcf )
(I.H20I
(I.H20)
(D.FI
(D.F)
(I.H6J
(D.FI
CD#F>
(IN)
(FP<->
N
1
5,00
522.63
,850
1.200
86.0
63,0
1.0
65,0
52.0
,188
2850.2
N
2
5.00
524.84
,540
.780
91.0
84.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
,188
2271.7
N
3
5.00
527.26
.620
.880
94.0
84.0
1.0
66,0
52.0
.188
2436.5
N
4
5.00
530.24
1.000
1.400
96.0
B4.0
1.0
66.0
52.0
.188
3094.4
N
5
5.00
533,45
1.100
1,550
100.0
eS.O
1.0
66.0
52,0
.1«8
3245.4
N
6
5.00
536.52
.970
1.300
104.0
86.0
1.0
66.0
52.0
,188
3047,6
E
1
5.00
538.92
.600
• 860
98.0
86.0
1.0
66.0
52.0
. 188
2396.9
f;
2
5.00
541.58
.750
1.050
101.0
87.0
1.0
66.0
52.0
.188
2679,8
t*
3
5,00
544.42
.060
1.200
104.0
88.0
1.0
68,0
52.0
,188
2875.1
t
4
5.00
547.47
• 960
1.400
107.0
88.0
1,0
68,0
52,0
.188
3037.6
t
5
S.00
550.43
,920
1.300
110.0
90.0
1.0
68.0
52,0
.188
2973.7
F
6
5.00
553.00
.710
1.000
111.0
90.0
1.0
68.0
52.0
,188
-------
TABLE A-10
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 10-TB* II ATE- 10-31-75
ATMOS
ATMOS
STAC"
H'r'O
PARTIC
PARTIC
^TAC*
INIT
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
TEMP
PRES
V/.C
COND
WT-PTL
XT-
TTL
AREA
VOL
02
C02 CO tube
(DC.
n
(I.HG)
(l.R'O)
(ML)
(MS)
(MG1
(FT? 1
(Dr.Fi
DRY
DRY DRY (,OEF
69.
0
27.65
3.90
7.4
1959.70
1959
.70
3.08
553.00
20.9
0.0
0.0 .746
PORT-
SAMP
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
train
STACK
5. GEL'
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VOL
P
H
IN
OUT
VaC
TEMP
TEMP
T DlA
VEI


(MINI
torn (J
¦ H20)
(I.H20J
(D.F)
(O.F)
(I.HG)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(FPM)
F.
l
5.00
555.29
.570
.820
88*0
86.0
2.0
68.0
52. 0
. 188
2343.2
t~
2
5.00
557.73
.670
.950
89.0
86.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2540.4
F.
3
5.00
560.71
.880
1.250
96.0
66.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2911.5
E
4
5.00
563.68
• 980
1.380
102.0
87.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
• 188
3072,4
f
5
5.00
566.48
.810
1.170
104.0
88.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
• 188
2793.3
F
6
5.00
569.18
.800
1.150
105.0
90,0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2776.0
N
1
5.00
571.45
.540
.700
100.0
88.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2280.7
N
2
5.00
573.92
.640
.910
100.0
88.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2482.9
N
3
5.00
576.52
.760
1.090
100.0
88.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
2705.7
N
4
5.00
579.60
1.000
1.420
100.0
88.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
3103.6
N
5
5.00
582.61
1.000
1.420
102.0
H9.0
2.0
6H.0
52.0
• IBS
3103.6
N
6
5.00
585.59
¦ B5Q
1.230
105.0
89.0
2.0
68.0
52.0
.188
-------
TABLE A-11
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN- 11-BVH l>f It- 1 0-31-7H
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
70.0
ATMOS
PRES
n.HG)
STACK H,'0
V*C CONO
(I.H.eO) (ML)
PARTIC
WT-PTL
(MG)
PARTIC
WT-TTL
(MG)
27.65 -1.60
4.4 811.60 611.60
STACK
AREA
(FT?)
.19
IN1T
VOL
(DCF)
PERC
PERC
PERC
02
CO?
CO
DRY
DRY
DRY
20.9
0*0
o«o
PITOT
Ti'BE
COEF
• 636
PORT

SAMP
METER
DELTA
DELTA
TEMP
TEMP
TRAIN
STACK
S * GEL
PROBE

POINT
TIME
VOL
P
H
IN
OUT
VA'
TEMP
TEMP
T DI A
VEl


MIN)
(DCF) (
l.H20>
(I.H20)

(D.F)
(I.HG)
(D.F)
(D.F)
(IN)
(FP*')
E
I
5.00
215,00
1.300
.360
72.0
70.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3975.6
E
1
2.50
215.72
1.300
.350
74.0
70.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3975,0
E
2
2.50
216.59
1.500
.410
75.0
70.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
4270.7
E
2
5.00
216.35
1.500
.410
60.0
72.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
4270.7
E
3
5.00
220.01
1.200
.320
62.0
72.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3619.9
E
3
2.50
220.78
1.200
.320
64.0
74.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3819.9
E
4
2.50
221.55
.660
.240
66.0
75.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3271.1
E

5.00
223.01
.660
*240
66.0
75.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3271.1
N
1
5.00
224.35
.650
.160
64.0
76.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
2H11.3
N
1
2.50
22^.90
.650
.160
66.0
79.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
2H11. i
N
2
2.50
225.47
.900
.240
66.0
HO. 0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
330b.1
N
2
5.00
226.67
.900
.240
68.0
60.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
330H.1
N
3
5.00
228.57
1.300
.360
92.0
62.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3975.8
N
3
2.50
229.42
1.300
.360
94.0
B2.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3975.0
N
4
2.50
230.27
1.200
.320
95.0
64.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
3M19.9
n
4
5.00
232.07
1.200
.320
96.0
84.0
1.0
65.0
52.0
.125
-------
TABLE A-12
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
WU - 12-TH" UATE- 10-31-7b
ATMOS ATMOS STACK HO PARTIC PARTIC STACK
TEMP PHES V*C COND WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL 02 C02 CO TUBF
(DG.F) (I • HG) (I.HP01 (ML)	(MO)	
-------
TABLE A-13
PARTICULATE emission oata
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
1 -LOS
2-LOS
3-1O*

DATE OF RUN'

10-29-75
10-29-75
10-29-75
DN
PROBE TIP OIac'ETER
IN
.188
• 188
.188
TT
NET TINE OF RUN
MIN
60.0
60.0
60.0
PB
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
IN.HG
28.44
28.48
28.4
PM
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
IM.H20
1.21-
1.177
1 .298
VM
vol dry gas-meter cono
DCF
32.59
32.5*
33.99
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
DEG.F
64. p
7*i. 7
77.8
VMSTD
VOL DPY GftS-STD CONO
DSCF
31.42
3;;.72
3i. a
vw
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
ml
4.-.-!
3 . ->
5.4
vwv
VOL H20 ViPOR-STO CONO
SCF
.19
. 1 K
.2'>
PNOS
PERCENT MOISTURE *Y VOL

.6

r-
m /m
MD
MOLE FRACTION DRY gas

.994
.994
.99
PC02
PERCENT C02 «Y VOL# DPY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 ->Y VOL, DRY

20.9
20.9

PCO
PERCENT CO ~Y VOlt DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
PN2
PERCENT N2 r.y VOL * DRY

79.1
79.1
?9.1
MiD
MOLECULAR 4T-DRY STX GAS

28.S4
28.84
28.6*
MW
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS

28.77
28.77
28.7'"^
CP
PITOT TU^E COEFFICIENT

.74-6
.746
• 7',vr>
DPS
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
IN.H20
• 852
• 323
. 9 -F
TS
AVG STA'-i- TEMPERATURE
OEG.F
45.^

61.1
NP
NET SAMPLING POINTS

12
12
12
PST
STATIC PRfc'S OF STACK
IN.HG
.29
.29
.2°
PS
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
IN.HG
28.73
28.77
28.-9
vs
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
FPM
2750
2706
2086
AS
STACK A*EA
IN?
444
444
444
QAM
ACTUAL STACk FLOWRATE
M3/MIN
239.8
236. -i
251.6
QS
STK FLOwR ATr t DRY.STD CN
DSCFM
8467
827;
8597
QA
actual stack flowrate
ACFM
8469
8333
8887
PERI
percent isokinetic

98.5
98.6

MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MG
9S70.00
5757.10
2153.60
MT
particulate kt-total
MG
9570.00
5757.10
2153.60
IC
PERC I*PINGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.00
CAN
PART, LOAD-PTL.STD CN
GR/DSCF
4.69079
2.88629
1.03950
CAO
PART, LOAD-TTL•STD CN
GR/DSCF
4.69079
2.88629
1.03950
CAT
PART. LOAO-PTL.ST* CN
GR/ACF
4.68981
2.86474
1.00564
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
GR/ACF
4.6898]
2.86474
I .00564
CAW
PARTIC emis-partial
LB/HR
340.37
204.59
76.59
CAX
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
LB/HP
340.37
204.59
76.59
-------
TABLE A-L3 (Continued)
particulate emission uata
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
^-TBW
5-HVW
6-i. nw

DATE OF •

10—29—75
10-30-75
10-31-75
DN
PROBE TIP 01ft^ETER
IN
• 188
.188
.188
TT
NET TIME OF RUN
MIN
60.0
60.0
60.0
PB
B'iRO1' ETRIC PRESSURE
IN.HG
28.35
28.! 7
27.74
PH
AVG orifice pres drop
IN.H20
1.338
2.262
1 .187
VM
VOL ORr GaS-METER COND
DCF
35.32
5 .<*3
32.25
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
DE8-F
91. *
73.
74.2
VHSTD
VOL Dwy GuS-STD COND
DSCF
3?.27
47.96
29.76
VW
TOT«L ^0 COLLECTED
ml
5.5
9. -
-.3
VWV
VOL H?0 V/iPOk-STD CONO
SCF
. ">
.44
.3
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE Y VOL

• •'*
.9
• . '¦<
MD
MOLE FRACT ?ON DRY GAS

.99?
.99 1
.9*-'
PC02
PERCENT C02 BY VOL~ DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 pY VOL. DRY

2C.9
20.9

PCO
PERCENT CO ~Y VOL » DRY

0.0
0.0
Q.n
PN2
PERCENT N2 FY VOL. DRY

79.1
79.1
79.1
MWD
MOLECULAR *T-DRY Sir GAS

23.84
28.84
28.84
MM
MOLECULAR rfT-STK GAS

28.75
28.74
28.69
CP
PITOT TU^E COEFFICIENT

.746
.8-8
.746
DPS
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
IN.H20
.94*
1.587
.832
TS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
DEG.F
6.0
56.0
6 3.
HP
NET SAMPLING POINTS

12
In
12
PST
STATIC PRfS OF STAC".
I'^.HG
.29
.19
.29
PS
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
IN.HG
28.64
29 « 36
28. 3
VS
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
FPM
?949
4308
??03
AS
STACK APEA
T-V2
444
i 3
444
(JAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATt
M3/MIN
257.2
11.*
244.5
OS
STK FLOwR,'*TE» DRY»STD CN
DSCFM
8722
374
8' 89
OA
ACTUAL ^TAC' FLDwRATE
acfm
9'-.a.?
388
8-33
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

9 8 . 7;
99. ,
97.7
MF
PARTICULATE *T-PARTIAL
MG
1230.40
1460.BO
1639.90
MT
PARTICULATE wT-TOTAL
M6
1230.40
1460.80
1639.90
IC
PERC IHPINGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.00
CAM
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
Gfl/DSCF
.587-4
.46905
.84B6i)
CAO
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
GR/DSCF
•58724
.46905
.8486^
CAT
PANT. LOAD-PTL^STC CN
GR/ACF
.56394
.45257
.795'5
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL~STK CN
GR/ACF
.56394
.45257
.79515
CA*
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
LB/HR
43.89
1.5':
58.81
CAX
PARTIC FulS-TOTAL
LB/HR
41.89
1 .50
58.a *
-------
TABLE A-13 (Continued)
particulate emission data
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
7-evw
6-TBC
9-TRC

DATE OF RUN

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
ON
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
IN
«1 25
.180
.188
TT
NET TIME 0? RUN
MIN
60,0
60.0
60. n
P 8
BAROMETRIC pressure
IN.HG
27.74
27.71
27.71
Pm
AVG ORIFICE PRE5 DROP
IM.H20
• 412
1.0*0
l.lso
VM
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
DCF
22.08
30.86
33. *
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
PEG.F
72.3
8' .7
93."
VMSTO
VOL ORY G/nS-STD COND
DSCF
20.41
2'< • 09
29.51
VW
TOTaL *20 COLLECTED
ml
-.7
9.
7 . c
vwv
VOL Npo ViPOR-STD COND
SCF
• ?.l
.43
.3-
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE FrY VOi,

1.3
1 . S
1.2
MO
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS

.987
.98 •
• V88
PC02
PERCENT C02 BY VOLt DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P 02
PERCENT 02 *Y VOL. DRY

20,9
20.9
20.-7
PCO
PERCENT CO py VOL• DRY

0.0
0.0
0 . 0
PN2
PERCENT N2 MY VOL. dry

79,1
79.1
79. t
MWD
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST*' GAS

26.84
28.84
28.84
MW
MOLECULAR »'T-STK GAS

28.*9
28.67
20.7
CP
PITOT TUHE COEFFICIENT

.8 <8
.746
.74iS
DPS
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
IN.H20
1 .537
.747
.323
TS
AVG ST A' "• TEMPERATURE
DEG.F
67. o
65.0
66. S
NP
net ?- mP1 ing Points

1*
12
12
PST
STATIC. PRCS OF STACK
IN.M0
. 19
.29
.2"
PS
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
IN.HG
2 ' .93
28.00
28.00
vs
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
FPM
4 32o
2658
279«
AS
STACK Af>EA
IN2
13
444
444
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATK
M3/MIN
11.*
231 .8
243. '
GS
STK FLOWR-.TE* DRY,STO CN
DSCFM
360
7618
8039
GA
ACTUAL STAC* F{_0*RA7E
ACFM
389
8187
86
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

99. 4
97.9
97.8
MF
PARTICULATE wT-PARTIAL
MG
893.10
2998.90
30-9.30
MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
MG
893.10
2998.90
30'-9. 30
IC
PERC ImPINGER C^TCM

0.00
0.00
0.00
CAN
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
GR/DSCF
.67403
1.64391
1.60158
CAO
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD C !
GR/DSCF
.674*3
1.64391
1.6 0158
CAT
PART. LOAD-PTL.ST* CN
GR/ACF
.62453
1.52967
1.49-64
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL»ST^' CN
GR/ACF
.62453
1.52967
1.49"64
CA*
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
LB/HR
2.08
107.32
109.^3
C AX
PARTIC MIS-TOTAL
LB/HR
2.00
107.32
109.93
-------
TABLE A-13 (Concluded)

particulate emission DATA


NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
1 »*-T8M
11 —BVM
12-TH*

date of hun

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
ON
PROBE TIP Ola-ETER
IN
• 188
.12* '
.188
TT
NET TIME OF RUN
WIN
60.0
60.0
60.0
PB
barometric pressure
IN.HG
27.65
27.65
27.65
PM
AVG ORIFI E PRES DROP
IN.H20
1,131
• 303
1 • 11 1
VM
VOL DRY G'S-METER COND
DCF
32.59
18 .96
31 .96
TM
AVG GA> METER TEMP
DE6.F
93.5
8- .6
93.8
VMSTO
VOL 0*y G/S-STD COND
OSCF
28.93
IT.18
28.3C
Vw
TOT-»L H20 COLLECTED
ML
7.4
4.4
1 .
VWV
VOL H20 V-POR-STD COND
SCF
.35
.2'
.4
PMOS
PERCENT MOTSTU»E hY VOL

I .2
1.2
1 . v
MO
mole fraction DRY sas

.988
.988
.98 '
PC02
PERCENT COZ BY VOL, DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 ;JY VOL. DRY

20.9
20*9
20.9
PCO
PERCENT CO -Y VOLf DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
PN2
PERCENT N2 my VOL. DRY

79.1
79.1
79.1
MVD
MOLECULAR *T-DRY ST* GAS

28.84
28.84
28.84
MW
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS

28.71
28.71
28. 6C,
CP
PI TOT TU^E COEFFICIENT

.746
•a*8
• 746
DPS
AVG ST* VELOCITY HEAD
IN.H20
.792
1.116
.768
TS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
DEG.F
68. ft
6*.0
68.0
NP
Hf.T SAMPLING POINTS

12
16
12
PST
STATIC PRF$ OF STACK
I w . MG
.2*
. i 2
.2«
PS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
I'.H©
27.94
27.77
27.94
VS
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
FPM
2749
3658
27 7
AS
STACK AU'EA
IN2
444-
?7
444
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
M3/MIN
239.7
19.7
23^.
OS
ST* FLDWRaTF. DRY,STD CN
DSCFM
7839
t>43
7ft8 '
QA
ACTUAL STACr FLOwRATE
ACFM
8465
695
H336
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

9t».0
99.0
9M,f
MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MG
1959,70
811.60
2289.60
MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
MG
19^9.7C
811.60
2289.60
IC
PERC IMPINGES CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.00
CAN
PART. LOAD-PTL t STD CN
GR/DSCF
l.f'4 335
.72732
1.24368
CAO
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
GR/DSCF
1.H4335
.72732
1.2436*
CAT
PART. LOAD-PTL.ST* CN
GR/ACF
.96617
.67326
1.14591
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
GH/ACF
.96617
.67326
1.14591
CAW
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
LB/HR
70.09
4.01
81.8*
CAX
PART1C E"IS-TOTAL
LB/HR
70.09
4.01
81.8'-
-------
TABLE A-14
particulate emission data
(METRIC RESULTS)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
1 -LOS
2-LOS
UJ
I
r
o

DATE OF RUN

10-29-75
10-29-75
10-29-75
ON
PROSE TIP OIA^ETER
IN
.isa
• lid
.188
TT
NET TIME OF RUN
M IN
60.0
60.0
f 0.0
PB
BAROMETRIC pressure
IN.H6
20.44
28.48
2ft.4
PM
AVG ORIFICE PRE5 OROP
IN.H20
I .215
1.177
1.298
VM
vol dry gas-meter cqnd
OCF
32.59
32.5«
33.99
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
DEG.F
64. ?.
76.7
77.8
VMSTM
VOL DRY GaS-STD COND
NCM
.89
.8 '
.9
V#
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
ml
4.0
3.a
5.4
VWM
VOL N20 VuPO°-ST0 COND
NM3
.01
.01
.01
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE PY VOL

• 6
• 6
O
•
MD
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS

. 994
.99*
.99 •
PCOZ
PERCENT COS BY VOL• DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 -Y VOL. DRY

20.9
20.9
20. c
PCO
PERCENT CO ; Y VOL* DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
PN2
PERCENT N2 ?Y VOL. DRY

79, \
79.1
79.1
MWD
MOLECULAR WT-QPY STk GAS

28.84
28.84
28.84
MW
MOLECULAR WT-ST* GAS

28. 77
28.77
28 . 7l-
CP
PITOT TU*E COEFFICIENT

.746
.746
. y wh
DPS
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
IN.H20
.852
.823
.9 m
TSM
AVG STAC>- TEMPERATURE
DE5.C
7,7
1 '.2
1-.2
NP
NET SAMPLING POINTS

12
12
12
PST
static pres of stack
IN.MG
.29
.29

PS
stack pressure, absolute
IN.HG
28.73
28.77
2A.-9
VSM
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
M/MIN
838.2
824.7
879.5
AS
STACK APEA
IN5
444
444
444
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FlOwRATE
M3/MIN
239.8
236 . •"*
251.6
QSM
STK FLOwRiTE~ ORy.STD CN
NM3/MIN
23^.^
234.2
243.4
PERI
percent i^o^imetic

90 . S
98.6
9f ."
MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MG
9570.00
5757.10
2153.60
MT
PARTICULATE ¥T-T0TaL
MG
9570.00
5757.iO
2153.60
IC
PERC I«PINGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.0 0
CANM
PART. L0AD-PTL «STD CN
M«/NH3
10734.13
6604.80
2378.73
CAOM
PART. L0A0-TTL.STD CN
MB/NM3
10734.13
6604.80
2378.73
CATM
PART. L0A0-PTL,STK CN
MG/M3
11731.88
6555.49
2301.25
CAUM
PART. LOAO-TTL.STk CN
M'VM3
10731.08
6555.49
2301.25
CAWM
PARTIC EMIS-PARTlAt.
KG/HR
154.391
92.798
34.739
CAXM
PARTIC F.MIS-TOTAL
KG/HR
154.391
92.798
34.739
-------
TABLE A-14 (Continued)
particulate emission data
(METRIC RESULTS)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
*-TBW
5-3 VW
6- OW

DATE OF RU*

10-29-75
10-30-75
10-31-75
DN
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
IN
.108
.iaa
.188
TT
NET TIHE OF RUN
HIM
60.0
60.0
60.0
PB
BtRO ETRIC PRESSURE
IN.HS
28. 35
28. 7
27.74
PM
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
IN.H20
1.338
2.262
1 .187
VM
vol dry Gas-meter cond
DCF
35.32
5tf. 93
32.25
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
DEG.F
91.*
•73.n
74.2
VMSTM
VOL DRV G.iS-STD COND
NCM
.91
1 .36
• ft
VW
TOTAL h?o collecteo
ml
5.5
9. >
<.3
VWM
VOL h20 VnPOR-STD COND
NM3
.01
.01
.01
PHOS
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL

• H
.9
'! .
MO
MOLE fraction ory GAS

.992
.991
.98
PC02
PERCENT C02 er VOL. DRY

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 PY VOL* DRY

20.9
20.9
20.«
PCO
PERCENT CO ;• Y VOL. DRY

0.0
0.0
0,0
PN2
PERCENT N2 =^Y VOL. ORY

79.1
79.1
79.1
MWO
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST* r,AS

28.84
28.84
28.84
MW
MOLECULAR WT-STft GAS

20.75
28.74
28.69
CP
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT

.746
.8 !8
.746
OPS
AVG STk VELOCITY MEAD
IN.H20
.940
1.587
.832
TSM
AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
DEG.C
I 7.8
13.3
1 7.2
NP
NET S'-MPl ING POINTS

12
1 ^
12
PST
STATIC PRES OF STACK
IN.H6
.29
. 19
.29
PS
STAC* PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
IN.HG
28.64
28,36
28.< 3
VSM
AVG STAC* GAS VELOCITY
M/MIN
898.9
1313.1
854.4
AS
STAC* A»FA
IN2
444
',3
444
QAM
ACTUAL STACk FLOWRATE
M3/MIN
257.2
II.
244.5
3SM
STK FLOwRnTE. ORY.STD CN
NM3/MIN
247.0
10.6
22^.1
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

90.?
99.-
97.7
MF
PARTICULATE tfT-PARTIAL
MG
1230.40
1460.SO
1639.90
MT
PARTICULATE *T-TOTAL
MG
1230.40
1460.ao
1639.90
IC
PERC IMPXNGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.00
canm
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
MG/NM3
1343.81
10 73.36
1941.87
CAOM
PART. LOAD-TTL«STD CN
MG/NM3
1343.81
1'•73.36
1941,87
catm
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
MG/M3
1290.48
1035.62
1819.58
CAUM
PART. LOAO-TTL.ST* CN
MG/M3
1290.48
1035.62
- 1819.58
CAWM
PARTIC EMIS-PARTlAL
KG/HR
19.910
.682
26.68^
CAXM
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
KG/HR
19.910
.682
26 , 68'-
-------
TABLE A-14 (Continued)
particulate emission data
I METRIC RESULTS)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
/-RVW
8-TBC
9-T9C

DATE OF RUM

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
ON
PROBE TIP DIMETER
IN
.125
.188
.188
TT
NET TIME OF RUN
MIN
60.0
60.0
60.0
PB
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
IN.HG
27.74
27.71
27.71
PM
AVS OKIFICE PRE? DROP
IN.H20
.412
1.060
1.160
VM
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
DCF
22. 08
30.86
33.16
TM
AVG GAS METER TEMP
DEG.F
TP.3
8 . 7
93.
vmstm
VOL OPY GAS-STO COND
NCM
.58
.8"
• 8«'»
VW
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
ml
5.7
9.i
7.r
VWM
VOL H20 Vf. POR-STD COND
NM3
.01
.01
.0 1
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL

1.3
1.5
1.2
MD
mole fraction dry gas

.987
.98 i
.988
pcoa
PERCENT C02 3Y VOl» DRV

0.0
0.0
0.0
P02
PERCENT 02 RY VOL# DRY

20.9
20.9
20.9
PCO
PERCENT CO BY VOL. DPY

0.0
0.0
0.0
PNH
PERCENT N2 3Y VOL. DRY

79.1
79.1
79,1
MWO
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS

28.84
28.84
28,84
MW
MOLECULAR wT-ST< GAS

28.69
28.67
28.7
CP
PITOT TUt'E COEFFICIENT

.838
.746
.746
DPS
AVG STK VELOCITY HEaO
IN.H20
) .537
.747
.823
TSM
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
DEG.C
19.4
1 * . 3
19.2
NP
NET SAMPLING POINTS

16
12
12
P ST
STATIC PRtS OF STACK
I m . h G
.19
.29
.2*
PS
STACK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
IN.HG
27.93
28.00
28.00
VSM
AVi STACK GAS VELOCITY
M/MIN
1316.9
81".2
851.7
AS
STACK Af-EA
IN2
i 3
444
444
QAM
ACTUAL STAC* FLOWRATf-
M3/MIN
11.0
231.fi
24 3. ¦'
QSM
STK FLOWRaTE. DRY ~STO CN
NM3/MIN
10.2
21^.7
226.8
PERI
percent isokinetic

99. i
97.9
97.8
M F
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MG
893.10
2998.90
30f.9.3G
MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
mg
893.10
2998.90
30r 9.30
IC
PERC lMPINr,ER CATCH

0.00
0.00
0.00
CANM
PART » LOAD-PTL.STD CN
MG/NM3
1542.40
3761.84
3664.96
CAOM
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
M»i/NM3
1542.40
3761.84
3664.96
CATM
PART. LOAD-PTL.STK CN
MG/M3
1429.15
3500.40
3*11 .0
-------
TABLE A-14 (Concluded)
particulate emission data
-------
TABLE A-15
SUMMARY OF RfSUITS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
I-LOS
2-LOS
w
i
o

DATE OF RUN

10-29-75
10-29-75
10-29-75
VMSTD
VOL ORY GftS-STD COND
DSC)
31.42
30.72
31.91
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOl

.ft
.6
.ft
TS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
DE6.F
45.
5• A
61.1
QS
STK FLOWR'.TE. DRYiSTD CN
DSCFM
0467
8271
8597
OA
ACTUAL STACK FLOwRATE
ACFM
8469
8333
8887
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

98.S
98.6
98. i
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH




MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MG
9570.00
5757.10
2153.6H
CAN
PART. LOAO-PTL,STD CN
GR/DSCF
4.69079
2.86629
1.03950
CAT
PART. LOAD-PTt. »STK CN
GR/ACF
4 .68981
2.86474
1,00564
CAM
PARTIC F.MIS-PARTIAL
LB/HR
340,37
204.59
76.59
PARTICULATES — TDTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
M'-
9570.00
5757.10
2153,60
CAO
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
6R/DSCF
4.69079
2.88629
1.03950
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL »STK CN
GR/ACF
4.68981
2.86474
1.00564
CAX
PARTIC kMIS-TOTAL
LB/HR
340.37
204.59
76.59
IC
PERC IMPINKER CATCH

0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE A-15 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF RfcSUlTS
NAME
VMSTD
PMOS
TS
OS
OA
PERI
DESCRIPTION
CATE OF RUs*
\
VOL DRY G'S-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE HY VOl
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
STr FLO^HATEf ORY.STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FL'WRATE
percent Isokinetic
UNITS
DSCF
0E6.F
DSCFM
ACFM
<,-T0W 5-QVW 6- UW
10-29-75 10-30-75 10-31-75
32.27
• H
64,0
8722
9 82
98.?
47.96
.9
56.0
374
388
99. S
?9.76
i .3
62. <»
a. 89
Be 33
97.7
4>
Ul
PARTICULATES
PARTIAL CATCH
MF	PARTICULATE. WT-PARTIAL	MG
CAN	PART. LOAQ-PTL»STD CN	GR/DSCF
CAT	PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN	6R/ACF
CAW	PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL	LB/MR
1230.40
.58724
.56394
43, «9
1460.BO
.46905
.45257
1.50
1639.90
.84860
.795/5
58.8 <
PARTICULATES
TOTAL CATCH
MT	PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL	MG	1230.40	1460.80
CAO	PART. LOAO-TTL«STD CN	6H/DSCF	,587?4	.46905
CAU	PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN	GR/ACF	.56394	.45257
CAX	PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL	LB/HR	43.89	1 .5(1
IC	PERC IhPINOER CfilCH	0.00	0.00
1639.90
.84860
.795)5
58.01
-------
TABLE A-15 (Continued)
SUMMuRY OF RESULT^
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
Y-BVW
fl-TBC
9-TBC

DATE OF HUv

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
VHSTO
VOL DRY GftS-STD COND
OSCF
20.41
2 >'¦ .09
29.51
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE 1 Y VOL

1.3
1.5
1 .2
IS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
0E6.F
67.0
65.0
66. 5
OS
STK FLOWR'TE. DRY.STD CN
DSCFM
*360
7610
8009
QA
ACTUAL <-TACK FLOWRATE
ACFM
309
8187
86 c>
PER I
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

99.4
97.9
97.8
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH




MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MO
893.10
2998.90
30f>9« 30
CAN
PART. LOAO-PTL.STD CN
(•R/DSCF
,67403
1.64391
1.6015ft
CAT
PART. LOAD-PTL »STK CN
6R/ACF
.62453
1.52967
1.49<64
CAW
PARTIC FMIS-PARTIAL
LB/HR
2.00
107.32
109.93
PARTICULATES ~ TOTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
MG
893.•0
2998.90
30r>9 .30
CAO
PART. LOAO-TTL•STD CN
GR/DSCf
.674D3
1.64391
1.60158
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
6R/ACF
.62453
1.52967
1 .49 '64
CAX
PARTIC FMIS-T(TAL
LB/HR
2.08
107.32
109.93
IC
PERC IHPINGEW CATCH

0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE A-15 (Concluded)
SUMHJRY OF RESULTS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
10-T8M
ll-BVM
12-TRM

DATE OF *Uh

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
VMSTD
VOL DRY GnS-STO CONO
DSCF
28.93
17,18
28.3s
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE nY VOt

1.2
1.2
1 1 ?
TS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
OEG.F
68.0
6S.0
6 fl « 0
OS
STK FLOv.R TE. DRY.STD CN
I DSCFM
7B39
643
768
OA
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
ACFM
8465
695
8316
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

.0
99.0
9H.0
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH




NF
PARTICULATE WT -PARTIAL
MG
I9b9.70
ail.60
2289.60
CAN
PART. LOAO-PTL »STD CN
OR/DSCF
1.04335
.72732
1,24368
CAT
PART. LOAO-PTL,STK CN
OR/ACF
.96617
.67 26
1.14591
cam
PARTIC F.MIS-PARTIAL
L8/HR
70.09
« .01
81.8'
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
MG
l9->9.7()
811.60
2289.6n
CAO
PART. LOAO-TTL.STO CN
GR/DSCf
1.04335
.72732
1,24368
CAU
PART. LOAD-TTL.STK CN
fiR/ACF
.96617
.67326
1.14591
CAX
PARTIC fc'MIS-TOTAL
LP/MR
70.09
4.01
81.8^
IC
PERC INPINGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE A-16
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
1 -LOS
2-LOS
3-1 Ok

DATE OF HUN

10-29-75
10-29-75
10-29-75
VMSTM
VOL ORY 6AS-STD CQND
NCM
,890
• 870
.90-)
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE »Y VOl

.6
• 6
.ft
TSM
AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
OEG.C
7.7
in,2
lh.2
QSM
STK FLOnR ATE * DRY#STD CN
NM3/M1N
P39.H
234.2
243.4
0AM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
M3/MIN
239.8
236.»
251,6
PERI
PERCENT ISOMNETIC

98.5
98.6
98.1
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH




MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MQ
9570.00
5757.10
2153.60
CANM
PART. LOAD-PTL.STD CN
MG/NM3
10734.13
6604.80
2378.73
CATM
PART. LOAD-PTL~STK CN
MG/M3
10731.aa
6555.49
2301.25
CAWM
PARTIC fMIS-PARTIAL
KG/HR
154.391
92.798
34,739
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
MG
9570.00
5757.10
2153,60
CAOM
PART. LOAO-TTL «STD CN
MG/NM3
10734.13
6604.80
2378.73
CAUM
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
MH/M3
10731.88
6555.49
23f1,25
CAXM
PARJIC EMIS-TOTAL
KH/Hft
154.391
92.J 98
34.739
IC
PERC IMPINGER C/-TCH

0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE A-16 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
'4-T«W
5-HVW
6-1 OW

date of run

10-29-75
10-30-75
10-31-75
VMSTM
VOL DRY GAS-STO COND
NCM
.914
1.356
.643
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE >:«Y VOl

• «
.9
i ,:i
TSM
AVG ST ACr< TEMPERATURE
OEG.C
17.8
13.3
17,2
QSH
STK FLOwR^TE. DRY.STO CN
NM3/MIN
247.0
10.6
22ini
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWWATE
M3/MIN
257.2
11 . 0
244.5
PERI
PERCENT ISOicINFTIC

9B,r>
99. H
97.7
PARTICULATES -- PARTIAL CATCH




HF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MR
1230.40
1460.80
1639.^0
CANM
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
M'i/NMJ
1343.81
1073.36
1941.87
CATM
PART• LOAD-PTL.STk CN
HB/H3
1290.40
1035.62
1819.58
CAWM
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
KG/HR
19.910
.682
26.684
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE u'T-TOTAL
MG
1230,40
1460.00
1639.90
CAOM
PART, LOAO-TTL.STO CN
Mv?/NM3
1343.81
1073.36
1941.87
CAUM
PART. LOAO-TTL•STK CN
MU/M3
1290.48
1035.62
1819.5H
CAXM
PARTIC fcMIS-TOTAL
KG/HR
19.910
. 682
26.68*
1C
PERC IHPINGER CATCH

0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE A-16 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
7-BVW -
B-T8C
9-TMC

DATE OF HUN

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
VMSTM
VOL DRY GfS-STO COND
NCM
»ii>78
.796
.8 6
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE HY VOi

1.3
1.5
1,2
TSM
AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
DE6.C
19.*
in.3
19,2
QSM
STK FLOwRaTE. DRY.STD CN
NM3/MIN
IC.2
215.7
226,8
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOURATF
M3/MIN
11.0
231.a
243,7
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

99. 
-------
TABLE A-16 (Concluded)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
1 -T8M
11-BVM
12-TBM

DATE OF run

10-31-75
10-31-75
10-31-75
VMSTM
VOL DRY GaS-STO COND
NCM
• 819
.487
.8- 1
PMOS
PERCENT MOISTURE my VOL

1*2
1.2
1.7
TSM
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
DEG.C
20,0
1M.3
20.0
QSM
STK FLOV/R'TE. DRY»STO CN
NM3/MIN
222.
16.2
21V.1
QAM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
M3/MIN
239.7
19.7
236.
PERI
PERCENT ISOKINETIC

9B.0
99.0
98.0
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH




MF
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MQ
m9.70
011.60
2289.60
CANM
PART. LOAD-PTUSTD CN
MCj/NM3
2387,54
1664.37
2845.96
CATM
PART. LOAD-PTL«STl* CN
MG/M3
2210.02
1540.65
2622.23
CAWM
PARTIC fMIS-PARTIAL
KG/HR
31.793
1.819
37.131
PARTICULATES — TOTAL CATCH




MT
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAt
MG
19S9.70
811.60
2289,60
CAOH
PART. LOAD-TTL.STD CN
M
-------
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
example particulate calculations
1. VOLUME OF 0RY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS	t1"
17.71«VM* (R-, ~ PM/13.6)
T:*t*%60.
( 0.0 » 44/100) • (20,9 • 32/100)
~<79.1 * 28/100)
31.42 DSC F
17.71* 32.S9M28.44* 1.215/13.6)
64.2*46 .
VMSTW = V*STO*0.028317= 31.42*0.028317=	.89 DN:'3
2.	VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
VWV = 0.0474«vw S 0.0474* 4.0	*	.19 St'F
VKM = VI*V®0• 028317 = . 190*0.028317 =	.00S4 Nr'3
3.	PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
lOO.oVHV	100.« .1 ••
PMOS =	s 			—	—	=	. PER Ew>T
VM5Tn*VWV	31.42* .
4. MOLE FRACTION OF ORv STACK GAS
100.-PMOS	100.-	.6
100.	100.
5. AVERAGE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF DRY STACK GAS
«WO = (PC02 » 44/100) * {PQ2 « 32/100)
~ fPM2*PC0 * 28/100)
^8.84
-------
6.	MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
MW = MWD'MD • 18«<1-MD)
= 28.8» .994 ~ 18M1- .994)	s 28.77
7.	STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
VS s 5129*CP»ASQRT(OPS*.123»VS»-« S*^*PS
T'^60
0.123* 2750* 444* .994*28.73
45,9 +460
=	8^67 DsCF '
OSM = QS*0.028317 = 8467*0.028317 =	240 N-13/M'N
9- STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT STACK CONDITIONS
u S * f T S ~ 4 6 0)
17.71 * PS * Mr.
8467*< 45,9+46n)
17.71*28.7.3* .994
QAM * QA*0.028317 = 8469*0.028317 s	240 NM3/M TN
-------
10. PERCENT. ISOKINETIC
PERI
1032*(TS*460)*VMST:"'
VS*TT*PS*MD*(DN*DN)
19 3 2 • ( 45.9*460)* 31.42
275Q» 60.0*28.73* .994# ,188
• „ 188
9 ^ t c, p E ^ Ef"' t
11. PARTICULATE LOADING — PROBE* CYCLONE, £NO FILTER
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CAN = 0,0154 <» (MF/VMSTD)
= 0.0154'- (9570.00/ 31.42)
= 4.69r»79 G /DS'F
CAN*
CAN»2288.34 = 4 .69»79«2288.34 = H734.13 M /NH3
12. PARTICULATE LOADING — TOTAL
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
( I )
CAO = 0,Q15<» * (MT/VMSTD)
= 0.0154*(9570.00/ 31.42)
CAOM s CA0*2288.34 = 4.69^79*2288.34
= 4.69179 G-/DSCF
= 1-734.13 H';/NM3
13. PARTICULATE LOADING — PROBE, CYCLONE, ftNO FILTER
(AT STAC*" CONDITIONS)
CAT
CATM
17.7I»CoN»PS«* 0
T\+460
17.71# 4.69*8*28.?3» .994
45.9*46 1
CAT*2288.34 = 4.68981*2288.34 = 11731.88	3
= ».689h» Gk/-CF
-------
14. PARTICULATE LOADING — TOTAL
(AT STACK CONDITIONS)
17,71»CAO«>PS«"D
TS+460
17.71° 4.69n8»28.73» .994
=	———	= '»,6898l mci/t,CF
45.9+460
CAUM = CAU«2288.34 = 4 .68981«2288.34	= 1^731.88 H^/M3
15. PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
— PROBE» CYCLONE, AND FILTER
CAW = 0,00857*CAN*OS
= 0,00857* 4.690	8467	= 340. 37 : •'¦
CAWH = CAw«»0.45359 = 340.37*0.45359 = 154.39 v.r./H--
16. PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
— TOTiL
CA X = 0.008S7»CAn*QS
= 0,00857* 4.6908* 8467	= 34U.37 I. /
CAXM = CAX»0.45359 = 340.37*0.45359 = 154.39 —./H~
17 % EMISSION FACTOR—TOTAL
E = Particulate Emission Rate
Tons Grain Handled
= 76.6 = 0.766 lb
100	ton
EM = (E) x (0.5)
= (0.766) x (0.5) = 0.383 kg
Mton
-------
18. KILOGRAMS GRAIN
KG =* (lb grain) x (0.4535924)
- (100,000) X (0.4535924)
«= 45,360 kg
(1) STANDARD CONDITIONS- AT 7f) OEG F (21.1 OEG r.j . 29.92 IN HS
(7--) MM HG)
-------