I I
•"58, Jl'-A/, ^M *
0.0.
Directives. 92RrM4
SVBJF.Cl;
FROM:
l\c isf l-riffiium Drinking Water SiTBidaals under 40 CFR *4i irJ 40 Cl R
!rO AS RujvAli.ition (mils «or iTjprMmd^atiT 3t i'iiWLA aiii^s
Ci2^
o
•C _^" ^ |1 i ^^^ ^
ic:.' of r flierjcticv^ind p.emtdiai Rc«?oiisc (''
/
• t'SoIki Y^'^sre and ,b*n"icrgenc> Response /
%"phfT; 0 "'it's?, Director
OfKc )fF\adiaric.ri and Indoor A
ilfilcc r«f Ai"ird r<:*ii,iik»i ''
I'O:
CLBEQ5E-
fT'i--. rnemorancrai adda-sscs t^r itsc cf jrd.i:ura iiaiiC/iriiv in J(i' < TK Piiri !'-l i-icl
CFR ?:urt 102 \\-~IKH <:mr £ 'c-rnedidLTr-n _goal,s lor grouna \v3.ter,> ihuf tire current or pok-iiLij]
*)iu-:-es ofJ.'.'iJd'iL; \\ntt-Tai Coinprcht'CSAe Environmental Hcsp-^asc, rotr'TX'aviiion. ,iru
J iilvBy Acluf I(i8n !C'F:Pr'l.Ah-:iics. 1 odny ' s iTucmorauduri vvitl be ^f interest lu^kc
dcci^nnriHiksis iht ha'.'c uraiiiioi ^s a contu nil rait nf ctwcern in ir-miniiwaier :it their
i.'LKCLA sue
TT'ir. J4H.:umcnr presides auniaiiu* 10 KuviotuJi alijfK isi dertliiig \\:\h fhepi;b]j; and i:k-
ns:uidial community reminding hew l:PA Loteridi to inspk-mcni ihe Nauoruil (./[ ,r:i! J F^ardons
x.ub;,ia!ic?N PoHution. Comir.ac'K-y Pbi iNd"). li t.k-senbft nunonaJ rolicy, This d-.i^urnen- IK
ret a -iii\siir it<- for FPA's sraniT-^s or rc-guliitioas, nor is it a regulation itAdl, Tlni5, it camut
ir,i;"\i',-c Jct'iiir* -binding TCLJUJ rennet K> on ! P,\. Suites, r-r l'ir* fcguiited comiTiumf} , IRC; may n>:>t
:ippi\ to a pacnrutar ^[uannn o.iscd '.laon the cfrcatt^stt
-------
Duplicate first page - Inserted to allow word searching
Directive no. 9283.1-14
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Use of Uranium Drinking Water Standards under 40 CFR 141 and 40 CFR
192 as Remediation Goals for Groundwater at CERCLA sites
FROM: Elaine F. Davies, Acting Director
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Stephen D. Page, Director
Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA)
Office of Air and Radiation
TO:
Addressees
PURPOSE
This memorandum addresses the use of uranium standards in 40 CFR Part 141 and 40
CFR Part 192 when setting remediation goals for ground waters that are current or potential
sources of drinking water at Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) sites. Today's memorandum will be of interest to site
decisionmakers that have uranium as a contaminant of concern in groundwater at their
CERCLA site.
This document provides guidance to Regional staff, in dealing with the public and the
regulated community, regarding how EPA intends to implement the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). It describes national policy. This document is
not a substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot
impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not
apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances.
-------
BACKGROUND
All remedial actions at CERCLA sites must be protective of human health and the
environment and comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs)
unless a waiver is justified. Cleanup levels for response actions under CERCLA are developed
based on site-specific risk assessments, ARARs, and/or to-be-considered material1 (TBCs).
The determination of whether a requirement is applicable, or relevant and appropriate, must be
made on a site-specific basis (see 40 CFR §300.400(g)).
CERCLA GROUNDWATER PROTECTION
"EPA expects to return usable ground waters to their beneficial uses whenever
practicable." (see 40 CFR §300.430(a)(l)(iii)(F)). In general, drinking water standards
provide relevant and appropriate cleanup levels for ground waters that are a current or potential
source of drinking water. However, drinking water standards generally are not relevant and
appropriate for ground waters that are not a current or potential source of drinking water (see
55 FR 8732, March 8, 1990). Drinking water standards include federal maximum contaminant
levels (MCLs) and/or non-zero maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs) established under
the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), or more stringent state drinking water standards. Other
regulations may also be ARARs as provided in CERCLA §121(d)(2)(B).
The Agency issued guidance concerning ground water use determinations in a memo
from Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Assistant Administrator to the Regions
entitled "The Role of CSGWPPs in EPA Remediation Programs" (OSWER Directive 9283.1-
09), April 4, 1997. This guidance states that EPA generally defers to State determination of
current and future groundwater uses, when the State has a Comprehensive State Ground Water
Protection Program (CSGWPP) that has been endorsed by EPA and has provisions for site-
specific decisions. For States that do not have an EPA-endorsed CSGWPP (or whose
CSGWPPs do not have provisions for making site-specific determinations of groundwater use,
resource value, priority or vulnerability), EPA uses either "EPA Guidelines for Ground-Water
Classification" (Final Draft, December 1986), or State groundwater classifications or similar
State designations, whichever classification scheme leads to more stringent remediation goals.
To-be-considered material, TBCs include non-promulgated advisories or guidance issued by Federal or
State governments that are not legally binding and do not have the status of potential ARARs. However, TBCs
should be considered along with ARARs as part of the site risk assessment and may be used in determining the
necessary level of cleanup for protection of health and the environment.
-2-
-------
MASS AND ACTIVITY (pCi/L and jig/L)
Concentrations of radionuclides in water are typically expressed in terms of "activity" of
the radionuclide per unit of volume in the water (e.g., picocuries per liter or pCi/L). Activity
measures the rate of disintegration of a radionuclide per unit mass (for soil, sediment, and
foodstuffs) or volume (for air and water). Because the carcinogenic effect of a radionuclide is
due to its disintegration rate, which occurs during its decay process, concentrations of
radionuclides are generally measured in terms of activity for health evaluation purposes.
Uranium is the only radionuclide for which the chemical toxicity has been identified to
be comparable to or greater than the radiotoxicity, and for which a reference dose (RfD) has
been established to evaluate chemical toxicity. The RfD is an estimate of a daily ingestion
exposure to the population, including sensitive subgroups, that is likely to be without an
appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. Uranium in soluble form is a kidney
toxin. The relative risk of uranium kidney toxin effects correspond to the level of exposure to
the uranium mass concentrations; the oral RfD of uranium is expressed in terms of mass (0.6
|ig/kg/day).
RADIONUCLIDE MCLs
On July 9, 1976, EPA promulgated 40 CFRPart 141 Drinking Water Regulations:
Radionuclides (1976 MCL rule). This 1976 MCL rule included the following MCLs: 5 pCi/L
for radium-226 and radium-228 combined; 15 pCi/L for gross alpha particle activity (including
radium 226, but excluding uranium and radon); and a concentration that produces a dose
equivalent of 4 mrem/yr or less to the total body or any internal organ for the sum of the doses
from man-made beta particles and photon emitters. A list of radionuclides that are addressed
by the gross alpha MCL are provided in Attachment A to today's memorandum. Also,
provided in Attachment B to today's memorandum is a list of radionuclide concentrations
calculated using the 4 mrem/yr beta particles and photon emitters MCL standard.
On December 7, 2000, EPA amended 40 CFR Part 141 (65 FR 76708, December 7,
2000) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Radionuclides (2000 MCL rule).
This 2000 MCL rule established requirements for uranium, and retained the existing
requirements for combined radium-226 and radium-228, gross alpha particle radioactivity, and
beta particle and photon radioactivity. The 2000 MCL rule did include MCLGs of zero for the
last four contaminants (see 40 CFR § 141.55).
The 2000 MCL rule established an MCL for uranium of 30 micrograms per liter (|ig/L).
For the MCL rulemaking, EPA assumed a typical conversion factor of 0.9 pCi/|ig for the mix of
uranium isotopes found at public water systems, which means that an MCL of 30 |ig/L will
typically correspond to 27 pCi/L. EPA considered the 30 |ig/L level (which corresponds to a
-3 -
-------
27 pCi/L level) to be appropriate since it is protective for both kidney toxicity and cancer.
However, the relationship between mass concentration (|ig/L) and activity (pCi/L) is dependent
upon the relative mix of the radioactive isotopes (e.g., uranium-234, uranium-235, uranium-
238) that comprise the uranium at a particular drinking water source.2 In circumstances with
more extreme conversion factors (> 1.5 pCi/|ig), uranium activity levels may exceed 40 pCi/L.
In these circumstances, EPA recommends in the 2000 MCL rule that drinking water systems
mitigate uranium levels to 30 pCi/L or less, to provide greater assurance that adequate
protection from cancer health effects is being afforded (see 65 FR at page 76715).
UMTRCA GROUNDWATER STANDARDS
On January 11, 1995, EPA promulgated 40 CFR Part 192 (60 FR 2854, January 11,
1995) Groundwater Standards for Remedial Actions at Inactive Uranium Processing
Sites (UMTRCA rule/3 Included in these standards is a constituent concentration limit for the
combined level of uranium-234 and uranium-238 in groundwater. These standards were
developed specifically for the cleanup of uranium mill tailings at 24 sites designated under
Section 102(a)(l) of UMTRCA (Title I sites). The list of 24 Title I sites is a closed set chosen
in 1979 that cannot be expanded without congressional action. The standards were developed
to ensure that all currently used and reasonably expected drinking water supplies near these 24
sites, both public and private, are adequately protected for use by present and future
generations. The concentration limit for the combined level of uranium-234 and uranium-238 is
30 pCi/L.
IMPLEMENTATION
The following subsections will clarify the use of standards under 40 CFR Part 141 and
40 CFR Part 192 as ARARs when setting remediation levels for uranium in groundwater at
CERCLA sites.
MCLs AND UMTRCA AS APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
The uranium drinking water standards contained within 40 CFR Part 141 are potentially
applicable requirements only for community water systems designated under § 141.26 (see 65
FR 76708, 76748 (December 7, 2000)). The uranium groundwater standards contained within
For further discussion of mass and activity, including the formula to convert between the two
measurement units, see U.S. EPA "Radiation Risk Assessment At CERCLA Sites: Q & A" EPA 540/R/99/006,
December 1999, pp. 5-6.
These standards were developed pursuant to Section 275 of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2022), as
amended by Section 206 of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7918) (UMTRCA).
-4-
-------
40 CFR Part 192 are potentially applicable requirements only for the 24 Title I sites designated
under Section 206 of UMTRCA.
MCLs AND UMTRCA AS RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS
In general, because the MCLG is zero for the radionuclides included in 40 CFR Part
141, the MCLs for these radionuclides are potentially relevant and appropriate requirements at
sites with radioactive contamination in groundwaters that are current or potential sources of
drinking water In particular, the uranium MCL of 30 ug/L is a potentially relevant and
appropriate requirement for groundwaters that are current or potential sources of
drinking water that have any of the uranium isotopes as a contaminant of concern.
Thus, for these radionuclides, the MCL concentration of 30 jig/L is generally used as the
cleanup level for groundwater that is a current or potential source of drinking water, and is to
be attained throughout the plume at the completion of the response action.
If either uranium-234 or uranium-238 is a contaminant of concern in ground
waters that are current or potential sources of drinking water, and the site is not a
Title I UMTRCA site, then the uranium UMTRCA standard under 40 CFR Part 192
of 30 pCi/L is a potentially relevant and appropriate requirement. Please note that this
means both the uranium MCL (40 CFR Part 141) and the uranium UMTRCA (40 CFR Part
192) standards may be selected as relevant and appropriate requirements for addressing
uranium contamination in ground water at the same CERCLA site. Since both standards
establish levels of uranium in groundwater that are acceptable for drinking, EPA would expect
that whenever the uranium UMTRCA ground water standard is a relevant and appropriate
requirement, the uranium MCL will also be a relevant and appropriate standard. Selecting both
the MCL and UMTRCA standards will ensure that the kidney toxicity and carcinogenic health
effects posed by uranium are adequately addressed.
MCL PREAMBLE AS A TO-BE-CONSIDERED
In addition, the preamble recommendation to public water systems concerning extreme
pCi/|ig conversion factors in the uranium 2000 MCL rulemaking may be a TBC. In situations
where the mix of uranium isotopes means that attaining the uranium MCL of 30 ug/L
may result in residual activity levels of uranium of greater than 40 pCi/L for total
uranium, and a site-specific risk assessment demonstrates that 30 pCi/L is protective,
then we recommend 30 pCi/L as a suitable cleanup level in addition to 30 ug/L. This
recommendation is made to ensure an equivalent level of protection from the carcinogenic
effects of uranium at CERCLA sites and public water systems, and is therefore consistent with
the recommendation made in the preamble to the 2000 MCL rule.
-5-
-------
CONDUCTING GROUNDWATER RESPONSES FOR 40 CFR PART 141 AND/OR
40 CFR PART 192 ARAR COMPLIANCE
When either the uranium MCL and/or the 30 pCi/L uranium UMTRCA
standard is considered a relevant and appropriate requirement, or the preamble to the
uranium 2000 MCL rulemaking is a TBC, then CERCLA response actions should be
conducted using the approach found in the NCP and Superfund guidance (e.g.,
determining groundwater use, point of compliance, areas of flexibility). Because the CERCLA
approach for attaining the uranium MCL is more stringent than the UMTRCA approach 40
CFR Part 192, using the CERCLA approach automatically insures compliance with the
UMTRCA groundwater standard as an ARAR. For example, the CERCLA approach for
complying with the MCL throughout the plume is more stringent than the UMTRCA approach
of complying with the groundwater standard only in the uppermost aquifer. Thus if an MCL is
attained throughout the plume, the groundwater standard will also be attained in the uppermost
aquifer. Key documents that include guidance on the Superfund approach to evaluating and
remediating groundwater include: "Presumptive Response Strategy and Ex-Situ Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Ground Water at CERCLA Sites" (OSWER Directive No.
9283.1-12), October 1996; "The Role of CSGWPPs in EPA Remediation Programs"
(OSWER Directive No. 9283.1-09), April 4, 1997, and; the "Use of Monitored Natural
Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites"
(OSWER Directive No. 9200.4-17P), April 21, 1999). These and other Superfund
groundwater guidance documents may be found on the Internet at:
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resources/gwdocs/index.htm.
Guidance documents that address establishing contaminant levels in soil to protect
groundwater include: "Soil Screening Guidance for Radionuclides: User's Guide" (OSWER
Directive No. 9355.4-16A), October 2000, and "Soil Screening Guidance for Radionuclides:
Technical Background Document" (OSWER Directive No. 9355.4-16), October 2000.
These Superfund guidance documents may be found on the Internet at:
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resources/radiation/radssg.htm.
FURTHER INFORMATION
The subject matter specialist for this directive is Stuart Walker of OERR 703-603-
8748. General questions about this directive, should be directed to 1-800-424-9346.
Addressees:
National Superfund Policy Managers, Regions 1-10
Superfund Branch Chiefs, Regions 1-10
Superfund Branch Chiefs, Office of Regional Counsel, Regions 1-10
Radiation Program Managers, Regions 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10
-------
Radiation Branch Chief, Region 2
Residential Domain Section Chief, Region 3
Radiation and Indoor Air Program Branch Chief, Region
Radiation and Indoor Office Director, Region 9
Federal Facilities Leadership Council
OERR Center Directors
OERR NARPM co-chairs
OERR Records Manager
cc:
Jim Woolford, FFRRO
Elizabeth Cotsworth, OSW
Craig Hooks, FFEO
Barry Breen, OSRE
Joanna Gibson, HOSC/OERR
Earl Salo, OGC
Jeff Josephson, Region 2
-7-
-------
Attachment A: List of Man-made and Naturally-Occurring Radionuclides addressed
by 15 pCi/L gross alpha particle activity MCL standard4
Nd-144 Ra-219 U-235
Sm-147 Ra-223 U-236
Sm-148 Ra-224 U-238
Po-208 Ra-226 Pa-231
Bi-210 Rn-220 Pu-236
Bi-211 Fr-221 Pu-238
Bi-212 Fr-223 Pu 239
Bi-213 Ac-225 Pu-240
Bi-214 Ac-227 Pu-241
Po-210 Th-227 Pu-242
Po-212 Th-228 Np-237
Po-213 Th-229 Am-241
Po-214 Th-230 Cm-242
Po-215 Th-232 Cm-244
Po-216 U-230 Cm-245
Po-218 U-232 Cm-248
At-217 U-233 Bk-248
At-218 U-234 Cf-250
Tl-217
This list includes only those radionuclides with half lives exceeding 4 days.
-------
Attachment B: List of Radionuclides addressed by
4 mrem/yr man-made beta particles and photon emitters MCL standard5
Nuclide
H-3
Be-7
C-14
F-18
Na-22
Na-24
Si-31
P-32
S-35
inorg
Cl-36
Cl-38
K-42
Ca-45
Ca-47
Sc-46
Sc-47
Sc-48
V-48
Cr-51
Mn-52
Mn-54
Mn-56
Fe-55
Fe-59
Co-57
Co-58
Co-58m
Co-60
Ni-59
Ni-63
Ni-65
Cu-64
Zn-65
Zn-69
Zn-69m
Ga-72
pCi/I
20,000
6,000
2,000
2,000
400
600
3,000
30
500
700
1,000
900
10
80
100
300
80
90
6,000
90
300
300
2,000
200
1,000
300
9000
100
300
50
300
900
300
6,000
200
100
Nuclide
Sr-85 m
Sr-85
Sr-89
Sr-90
Sr-91
Sr-92
Y-90
Y-91
Y-91m
Y-92
Y-93
Zr-93
Zr-95
Zr-97
Nb-93m
Nb-95
Nb-97
Mo-99
Tc-96
Tc-96m
Tc-97
Tc-97m
Tc-99
Tc-99m
Ru-97
Ru-103
Ru-105
Ru-106
Rh-103m
Rh-105
Pd-103
Pd-109
Ag-105
Ag-
110m
Ag-111
Cd-109
pCi/I
20,000
900
20
8
200
200
60
90
9,000
200
90
2,000
200
60
1,000
300
3,000
600
300
30,000
6,000
1,000
900
20,000
1,000
200
200
30
30,000
300
900
300
300
90
100
600
Nuclide
Sb-124
Sb-125
Te-125m
Te-127
Te-127m
Te-129
Te-129m
Te-131m
Te-132
1-126
1-129
1-131
1-132
1-133
1-134
1-135
Cs-131
Cs-134
Cs-134m
Cs-135
Cs-136
Cs-137
Ba-131
Ba-140
La- 140
Ce-141
Ce-143
Ce-144
Pr-142
Pr-143
Nd-147
Nd-149
Pm-147
Pm-149
Sm-151
Sm-153
pCi/1
60
300
600
900
200
2,000
90
200
90
3
1
3
90
10
100
30
20,000
80
20,000
900
800
200
600
90
60
300
100
30
90
100
200
900
600
100
1,000
200
Nuclide
Er-169
Er-171
Tm-170
Tm-171
Yb-175
Lu-177
Hf-181
Ta-182
W-181
W-185
W-187
Re- 186
Re- 187
Re-188
Os-185
Os-191
Os-191m
Os-193
Ir-190
Ir-192
Ir-194
Pt-191
Pt-193
Pt-193m
Pt-197
Pt-197m
Au-196
Au-198
Au-199
Hg-197
Hg-197m
Hg-203
Tl-200
Tl-201
Tl-202
Tl-204
300
300
100
1,000
300
300
200
100
1,000
300
200
300
9,000
200
200
600
9,000
200
600
100
90
300
3,000
3,000
300
3,000
600
100
600
900
600
60
1,000
900
300
300
For those isotopes where an MCL is calculated, concentration values were rounded using the same format
as EPA guidance for the 1976 MCL rulemaking.
-9-
-------
Nuclide
Ge-71
As-73
As-74
As-76
As-77
Se-75
Br-82
Rb-86
Rb-87
pCi/I
6,000
1,000
100
60
200
900
100
600
300
Nuclide
Cd-115
Cd-115m
In- 11 3m
In- 11 4m
In-115
In- 11 5m
Sn-113
Sn-125
Sb-122
pCi/I
90
90
3,000
60
300
1,000
300
60
90
Nuclide
Eu-152
Eu-154
Eu-155
Gd-153
Gd-159
Tb-160
Dy-165
Dy-166
Ho- 166
pCi/1
200
60
600
600
200
100
1,000
100
90
Nuclide
Pb-203
Bi-206
Bi-207
Pa-230
Pa-233
Np-239
Pu-241
Bk-249
1,000
100
200
600
300
300
300
2,000
- 10-
------- |