United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-00-028
May 2000
AIR
jfcEPA
Final Report
Hot Mix Asphalt Plants,
Truck Loading,
Manual Methods Testing
Asphalt Plant D
Barre, MA
Volume 1 of 1
-------
FINAL REPORT
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANTS
TRUCK LOADING
MANUAL METHODS TESTING
ASPHALT PLANT D, BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-004
Work Assignment No. 3-02
Prepared for:
Mr. Michael L. Toney (MD-19)
Work Assignment Manager
SMTG, EMC, OAQPS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
May 2000
Submitted by
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
5001 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 300
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333
FAX (919) 941-0234
-------
DISCLAIMER
The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under contract
to Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES). PES performed the work presented in this
document under three EPA contracts and seven Work Assignments; EPA Contract
No. 68-D-98-004, Work Assignment Nos. 1-08, 2-07, 3-02, and 3-05; EPA Contract No. 68-
D-70002, Work Assignment Nos. 0-05 and 1-07, and EPA Contract No. 68-D-70069, Work
Assignment No. 2-16. This document has been prepared by PES, reviewed following PES'
internal quality assurance procedures, and approved by PES for distribution. This document
has been subjected to the Agency's review, and has been approved by EPA for publication as an
EPA document. Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement by the EPA or PES.
GENERAL DISCLAIMER
This document may have problems that one or more of the
following disclaimer statements refer to:
~ This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished
by the sponsoring agency. It is being released in the interest of
making available as much information as possible.
~ This document may contain data which exceeds the sheet
parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the sponsoring
agency and is the best copy available.
~ This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts
and/or pictures which have been reproduced in black and white.
~ This document is paginated as submitted by the original source.
~ Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical
nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction
available from the original submission.
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 2-1
2.1 PM AND MCEM MEASUREMENTS 2-1
2 2 MCEM DEPOSITION MEASUREMENTS 2-7
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
3.1 FACILITY MODIFICATIONS FOR THE TESTING 3-1
3.2 COORDINATION BETWEEN TESTING AND PROCESS
OPERATIONS 3-3
3.3 PROCESS MONITORING DURING TESTING 3-6
3.4 PROCESS SAMPLES 3-6
3.5 CAPTURE OF LARGE DIAMETER MATERIAL 3-9
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4-1
4.1 TTE EXHAUST DUCT 4-1
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND
SAMPLE/VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINTS 5-1
5.2 DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS VOLUMETRIC
FLOW RATE 5-1
5.3 DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS DRY MOLECULAR
WEIGHT 5-3
5.4 DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS MOISTURE CONTENT 5-3
5.5 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER
AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER 5-3
5.6 MCEM DEPOSITION ON THE CEILING OF THE TTE 5-5
5.7 MCEM DEPOSITION INSIDE THE TTE EXHAUST DUCT 5-5
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONCLUDED)
Page
6 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROCEDURES
AND RESULTS 6-1
6 1 CALIBRATION AND PREPARATION OF APPARATUS 6-1
6.2 REAGENTS AND GLASSWARE PREPARATION 6-6
6.3 ON-SITE SAMPLING 6-6
6.4 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL QA/QC PROCEDURES 6-7
6 5 QA COORDINATOR FIELD AUDIT 6-7
APPENDIX A - PM AND MCEM TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B - PROCESS DATA
APPENDIX C - EPA METHOD 315 ANALYTICAL DATA
APPENDIX D - MCEM DEPOSITION DATA
APPENDIX E - FIELD DATA
APPENDIX F - QA/QC DATA
APPENDIX G - TEST METHODS
APPENDIX H - PARTICIPANTS
IV
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1.1 Emissions Test Log - TTE Exhaust Duct, Asphalt Plant D, Barre
Massachusetts 1-2
Table 2.1 Comparison of Simultaneous Tests During Hot Mix Asphalt
Load-Out at Asphalt Plant D 2-2
Table 2.2 Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emissions
Sampling and Exhaust Gas Parameters, TTE Exhaust, Location 2,
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 2-3
Table 2.3 Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emissions
Sampling and Exhaust Gas Parameters, TTE Exhaust, Location 1,
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 2-4
Table 2.4 Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Exhaust Gas
Concentrations and Emission Rates, TTE Exhaust, Location 2,
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 2-5
Table 2.5 Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Exhaust Gas
Concentrations and Emission Rates, TTE Exhaust, Location 1,
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 2-6
Table 3.1 Production Data, Asphalt Plant D 3-7
Table 3.2 Process Data, Asphalt Plant D 3-8
Table 5.1 Summary of Sampling and Analytical Methods, Asphalt Plant D,
Barre, Massachusetts 5-2
Table 6.1 Summary of Temperature Sensor Calibration Data 6-2
Table 6.2 Summary of Pitot Tube Dimensional Data 6-5
Table 6 3 Summary of Dry Gas Meter and Orifice Calibration Data 6-6
Table 6.4 Summary of EPA Method 315 Field Sampling QA/QC Data 6-8
Table 6.5 Summary of EPA Method 315 Blank Sample Catches 6-9
v
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1.1 Project Organization - US EPA Hot Mix Asphalt Load-out Operation,
Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 1-3
Figure 3.1 Process Flow Schematic, Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts 3-2
Figure 3.2 Temporary Total Enclosure 3-4
Figure 3.3 TTE Hood and Duct System 3-5
Figure 4.1 TTE Exhaust Sampling Port Locations, Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D 4-2
Figure 4.2 TTE Exhaust Traverse Point Locations, Location 1, Hot Mix Asphalt
Plant D 4-3
Figure 4.3 TTE Exhaust Traverse Point Locations, Location 2, Hot Mix Asphalt
Plant D : 4-4
Figure 5.1 EPA Method 315 Sampling Train Schematic 5-4
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials
CAAP - Coalition Against the Asphalt Plant
CEMS - Continuous Emissions Monitoring System
CTS - Calibration Transfer Standard
DQO - Data Quality Objective
EFIG - Emission Factor and Inventory Group
EMC - Emissions Measurement Center
EMAD - Emission Monitoring and Analysis Division
ESD - Emission Standards Division
ESP - Electrostatic Precipitator
FID - Flame Ionization Detector
FTIR - Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
HAP - Hazardous Air Pollutant
MCEM - Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
MRI - Midwest Research Institute
NDO - Natural Draft Opening
OAQPS - Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
vi
-------
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (CONTINUED)
PES
- Pacific Environmental Services
PM
- Particulate Matter
PTE
- Permanent Total Enclosure
RAP
- Recycled Asphalt
RTFOT
- Rolling Thin Film Oven Test
SED
- Silo Exhaust Duct
SMTG
- Source Measurement Technology Group
SVOHAP
- Semi-Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutant
TED
- Tunnel Emissions Duct
TFOT
- Thin Film Oven Test
THC
- Total Hydrocarbons
TTE
- Temporary Total Enclosure
VOHAP
- Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutant
YOST
- Volatile Organic Sampling Train
vii
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS) is investigating the asphalt manufacturing industry to identify and quantify
particulate matter (PM) and methylene chloride extractable matter (MCEM) emissions from
load-out operations. In support of this investigation, the EPA's Emissions, Monitoring and
Analysis Division (EMAD) issued Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) six separate
work assignments to conduct emissions testing at an asphalt plant during load-out operations.
This report was prepared under the sixth and final work assignment, WA 3-05 on EPA
Contract 68-D-98-004.
The primary objective of the emissions testing was to characterize the uncontrolled
emissions ofPM and MCEM from a batch production, hot mix asphalt plant during load-out
operation. Asphalt Plant D, a batch production facility in Barre, Massachusetts with the
capacity to produce 1,600 tons per day of hot mix asphalt, was selected as the host facility. To
capture load-out emissions, a temporary total enclosure (TTE) and exhaust system was built
around the load-out bay at Plant D. During load-out, emissions were drawn off the TTE
through an exhaust duct with a 15,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) exhaust fan. Testing for
load-out emissions was performed in the exhaust duct using EPA Test Methods 1, 2, 4, and
315. Three tests were performed over three consecutive days beginning on October 5, 1998.
Each test started early in the morning, ran most of the day, and included most of the plant's
production for the day. For each test, two simultaneous EPA Method 315 runs were
performed. An Emissions Test Log is presented in Table 1.1.
In addition to the emissions testing described above, PES monitored and recorded
process operations, collected process samples, and measured the temperature of the asphalt
concrete in the bed of selected transport trucks as the trucks left the load-out area. Also,
measurements were taken to estimate the deposition of MCEM on the ceiling of the TTE and
in the TTE exhaust duct.
Midwest Research Institute (MR1), another EPA contractor, was also on-site for the
testing and measured total hydrocarbon emissions from the TTE simultaneously with the PM &
MCEM testing. The MRI data are presented in a separate report.
1-1
-------
PES used three subcontractors for this effort: Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LP
(AAT), Eastern Research Group (ERG), and Atlantic Technical Services, Inc. (ATS). AAT
provided analysis of the asphalt samples. ERG provided analysis of the EPA Method 315
samples. ATS provided support during the field testing and the preparation of the Draft Final
Report.
TABLE 1.1
EMISSIONS TEST LOG - TTE EXHAUST DUCT
ASPHALT PLANT D, BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Run No.
Date
Pollutant
Start Time
Finish Time
Location No. 2
M315-1
10/05/98
PM & MCEM
0721
1403
M315-2
10/06/98
PM & MCEM
0714
1326
M315-3
10/07/98
PM & MCEM
0636
1313
Location No. 1
M315-6
10/05/98
PM & MCEM
0721
1400
M315-7
10/06/98
PM & MCEM
0714
1326
M315-8
10/07/98
PM & MCEM
0636
1313
The PES field test crew consisted of Frank Phoenix (Project Manager and Field Team
Leader), Dennis D. Holzschuh, Derek Hawkes, and Josh Berkowitz. The PES on-site QA
coordinator was Dennis P. Holzschuh. The ATS field crew consisted of Emil Stewart and
Allan Lowe. On-site direction and overall coordination for the project was provided by
Michael L. Toney, the EM AD Work Assignment Manager for WA 2-07, and Ron Myers with
EPA's Emission Factor and Inventory Group. The test project organization and major lines of
communication are presented in Figure 1.1.
In Section 2.0 of this report, a summary of results from emissions testing is presented.
More detailed results appear in Appendix A. In Section 3.0, a brief description of the process,
a summary of the process data collected, and results of analysis of the process samples is
presented. More detailed process information is presented in Appendix B. In Section 4.0,
descriptions of the sampling locations are presented. In Section 5.0, descriptions of the
sampling and analytical procedures used during the test program are discussed. Copies of the
test methods appear in Appendix G. Detailed analytical results appear in Appendix C. In
Section 6.0, the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures used during the test
program are presented Additional QA/QC data are presented in Appendix F.
1-2
-------
A»ph»lt Plant D
EPA/EMC
Work Auiznment Manaser
David LaFlamme
(508) 695-3252
Michael L. Toncy
(919)541-5247
PES
Prop-am Manager
John Chehaske
(703) 471*8383
EPA/EFIG
Ron Myers
(919)541-5407
MRI
PfCjWt Mwitfg
Scott Klamm
(816)753-7600
PES
OAJOC Officer
Jeff Van Atten
(703)471-8383
PES
Project Manager
Frank Phoenix
(919)941-0333
Pretest Site
Survey
Field Testing
PES
Subcontractor
Atlantic Technical
Services, Inc.
Analyses
Subcontractors
Eastern Research
Group
Advanced Asphalt
Technologies. LP
Report
Preparation
PES
Subcontractor
Atlantic Technical
Services, Inc.
Figure 1.1 Project Organization - US EPA Hot Mix Asphalt Load-out Operation, Asphalt Plant D,
Barre, Massachusetts
-------
2.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
In this section, the results of the Method 315 tests performed at Asphalt Plant D are
presented. The Method 315 tests were performed in the TTE exhaust duct during load-out
operations. A description of the procedures used to coordinate sampling and load-out
operations is presented in Section 3.0 of this report.
2.1 PM AND MCEM MEASUREMENTS
In Table 2.1, a comparison of results from the simultaneous Method 315 runs are
presented. Note that there are variations in the results, even between simultaneous
measurements. The variations, while significant on a relative basis, do not compromise the
quality or usefulness of the data. The variations stand out because the measured concentrations
are very low and are close to the lower detection limit of Method 315. For example, the
relative percent difference (RPD) is 82.8% between the simultaneous MCEM measurements
from repetition 2. The MCEM catch weights for repetition 2 are 0.0043 grams for Location 1
and 0.0018 grams for Location 2. While the relative percentage difference between these two
catch weights appears to be significant, both catch weights are very small, and close to the
detection limit of Method 315. Even in light of this difference and the high RPD, both sets of
data demonstrate that very little MCEM was present in the TTE exhaust.
In Tables 2.2 and 2.3, PM and MCEM emission sampling and exhaust gas parameters
are presented. In Tables 2.4 and 2.5, PM and MCEM emission gas concentrations and
emission rates are presented. Note that emission rates are presented in pounds per test period
(lb/test period) and pounds per ton of hot mix asphalt loaded (lb/ton). Pounds per test period
emission rates were calculated by multiplying the concentration in grains per dry standard
cubic feet (gr/dscf) first by the exhaust gas flow rate in dry standard cubic feet per minute
(dscfm) and second by the test time in minutes. Pounds per ton emission rates were calculated
by dividing the pounds per test period by the tons of asphalt loaded during the test period.
It should be noted that the results for Plant D presented here may be biased high. From
inside the TTE during and after load-out, material of sufficient size to quickly settle to the
ground under normal operations was observed on the screens covering the hood inlets and on
the surface of the hood near the hood inlets (normal operations refers to load-out without a
TTE). It is likely that some of this "large" material was drawn into the TTE ventilation system
and captured by the Method 315 trains.
2-1
-------
TABLE 2.1
COMPARISON OF SIMULTANEOUS TESTS
DURING HOT MIX ASPHALT LOAD-OUT AT ASPHALT PLANT D
Location 1
Location 2
Average
Exhaust Gas Flow Rate, dscfm3
Repetition 1
15,488
15,378
15,433
Repetition 2
14,646
14,123
14,385
Repetition 3
13,431
13,964
13,698
Particulate Matter
Emission Rate, lb/test period b
Repetition 1
1.58E+00
8.73E-01
1.23E+00
Repetition 2
1.90E+00
1.36E+00
1.63E+00
Repetition 3
5.42E-01
7.03E-01
6.23E-01
MCEM
Emission Rate, lb/test period b
Repetition 1
2.35E-01
2.05E-01
2.20E-01
Repetition 2 c
1.94E-01
8.06E-02
1.37E-01
Repetition 3
1.33E-01
8.46E-02
1.09E-01
" Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
b Pounds per test period.
c Relative percent difference; calculated as the absolute value of the difference between Location 1 and
Location 2 divided by the average of both locations times 100; equal to 82.8% for repetition 2.
2-2
-------
TABLE 2.2
PARTICULATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER
EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND EXHAUST GAS PARAMETERS
TTE EXHAUST, LOCATION 2
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D, BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Run No.
M315-1
M315-2
M315-3
Average
Date
10/5/98
10/6/98
10/7/98
Total Sampling Time, minutes
240.0
247.5
250.7
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm "
0.695
0.695
0.692
0.694
Sample Volume:
dscfb
166.863
172.033
173.427
170.774
dscmc
4.725
4.871
4.911
4.836
Average Exhaust Gas Temperature, °F
59
57
54
57
02 Concentration, % by Volume
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
C02 Concentration, % by Volume
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Moisture, % by Volume
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfm d
15,300
13,900
13,700
14,300
dscfm 3
15,400
14,100
14,000
14,500
dscmme
435
400
395
410
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
90.0
97.9
98.6
95.5
Process Parameters
RTFOTf Results, Mass Change at 325°F, %
-0.204
-0.246
-0.261
-0.237
Asphalt Temperature at Load-out, °F
306.7
325.1
326.7
319.5
Asphalt Loaded per Test Period, Tons
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
* Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at exhaust gas conditions.
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
f Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (ASTM D 2872).
2-3
-------
TABLE 2.3
PARTICULATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACT ABLE MATTER
EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND EXHAUST GAS PARAMETERS
TTE EXHAUST, LOCATION 1
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Run No.
M315-6
M315-7
M315-8
Average
Date
10/5/98
10/6/98
10/7/98
Total Sampling Time, minutes
240.0
246.9
250.1
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm "
0.754
0.714
0.666
0.711
Sample Volume:
dscfb
181.042
176.253
166.637
174.644
dscmc
5.127
4.991
4.719
4.945
Average Exhaust Gas Temperature, °F
60
58
55
58
02 Concentration, % by Volume
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
C02 Concentration, % by Volume
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Moisture, % by Volume
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.5
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfm d
15,400
14,400
13,200
14,300
dscfm a
15,500
14,600
13,400
14,500
dscmm e
439
415
380
411
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
95.9
100.2
99.8
98.6
Process Parameters
RTFOTf Results, Mass Change at 325°F, %
-0.204
-0.246
-0.261
-0.237
Asphalt Temperature at Load-out, °F
306.7
325.1
326.7
319.5
Asphalt Loaded per Test Period, Tons
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
a Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at exhaust gas conditions.
c Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
f Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (ASTM D 2872).
2-4
-------
TABLE 2.4
PARTICULATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER
EXHAUST GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
TTE EXHAUST, LOCATION 2
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D, BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Run No.
M315-1
M315-2
M315-3
Average
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr clock
10/5/98
0721-1403
10/6/98
0714-1326
10/7/98
0636-1313
Tons of asphalt loaded per test period
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
Particulate Matter
Concentration, gr/dscf a
Concentration, g/dscm b
Emission Rate, lb/test period c
Emission Rate, lb/ton d
1.66E-03
3.79E-03
8.73E-01
9.77E-04
2.72E-03
6.22E-03
1.36E+00
1.48E-03
1.41E-03
3.22E-03
7.03E-01
8.21 E-04
1.93E-03
4.41E-03
9.78E-01
1.09E-03
Methylene Chloride
Extractable Matter
Concentration, gr/dscf a
Concentration, g/dscm b
Emission Rate, lb/test period c
Emission Rate, lb/ton d
3.88E-04
8.89E-04
2.05E-01
2.29E-04
1.61E-04
3.70E-04
8.06E-02
8.80E-05
1.69E-04
3.87E-04
8.46E-02
9.87E-05
2.40E-04
5.48E-04
1.23E-01
1.39E-04
Grains per dry standard cubic feet at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
b Grams per diy standard cubic meters at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
c Pounds per test period.
d Pounds per ton of asphalt loaded.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2.5
PARTICULATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACT ABLE MATTER
EXHAUST GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
TTE EXHAUST, LOCATION 1
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Run No.
M315-6
M315-7
M315-8
Average
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr clock
10/5/98
0721-1403
10/6/98
0714-1326
10/7/98
0636-1313
Tons of asphalt loaded per test peri
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
Particulate Matter
Concentration, gr/dscfa
2.97E-03
3.67E-03
1.13E-03
2.59E-03
Concentration, g/dscm b
6.79E-03
8.40E-03
2.59E-03
5.92E-03
Emission Rate, lb/test periodc
1.58E+00
1.90E+00
5.42E-01
1.34E+00
Emission Rate, lb/ton d
1.76E-03
2.07E-03
6.33E-04
1.49E-03
Methylene Chloride
Extractable Matter
Concentration, gr/dscfa
4.43E-04
3.76E-04
2.78E-04
3.66E-04
Concentration, g/dscm b
1.01E-03
8.62E-04
6.36E-04
8.37E-04
Emission Rate, lb/test period c
2.35E-01
1.94E-01
1.33E-01
1.88E-01
Emission Rate, lb/ton d
2.63E-04
2.12E-04
1.56E-04
2.10E-04
* Grains per dry standard cubic feet at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
b Grams per dry standard cubic meters at 68°F (20° C) and 1 atm.
c Pounds per test period.
d Pounds per ton of asphalt loaded.
2-6
-------
2.2 MCEM DEPOSITION MEASUREMENTS
Measurements were made to estimate the MCEM deposition on the ceiling of the TTE
and in the TTE exhaust plenum and exhaust duct. The results of these measurements show that
MCEM deposition was low relative to the MCEM emissions measured in the air drawn off the
TTE.
Clean metal plates and clean C-channels were placed on the ceiling of the TTE on both
sides of the load-out area before the first test began. After the third test, the plates and
C-channels were removed and cleaned. The recovered samples were analyzed following the
procedures of Method 315. The results of the Method 315 analyses were used in conjunction
with the amount of hot asphalt concrete loaded while the plates and C-channels were in place to
estimate pounds of MCEM deposition on the TTE ceiling per ton of asphalt loaded. Details of
these estimates appear in Section 5 and in Appendix D. Total ceiling deposition was estimated
to be 3.13E-06 pounds of MCEM per ton of asphalt loaded.
An estimate of the MCEM deposition inside the TTE exhaust plenum and exhaust duct
was also developed following procedures similar to those discussed above. MCEM deposition
inside the TTE exhaust plenum and exhaust duct was estimated to be 4.53E-07 pounds per ton.
Refer to Appendix D for more details.
2-7
-------
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Asphalt Plant D is a batch production plant located in Barre, Massachusetts. A simplified
process flow schematic is shown in Figure 3.1. The plant has a normal production capacity of
150 tons per hour (tph) of hot mix asphalt. The plant typically starts up at 6:30 a.m. and
produces asphalt concrete until around 2:00 p.m. A realistic rate for a full production day is
about 200 to 210 tph. The facility air permit allows up to 255 tph of production and is based on
a production rate of 1 batch per minute for 60 minutes. The air permit also cites an annual
production of 600,000 tons per year. Seasonal restrictions and city-restricted operating hours
(5 days per week, 10 hours per day maximum) prohibit maximum production from being
achieved. Typical annual production for the facility is about 100,000 tons.
Under normal operations a truck pulls into the load-out bay and is loaded with 20 to
32 tons of asphalt concrete in 5 to 10 minutes. The exact mix of each batch (aggregate size,
etc.) is determined by the customer's request. Details of each mix are programmed into the
control room computer, along with the total tonnage for the customer. The computer controls
the batch of production by dividing the total load into an equal number of batches. A 21-ton
load, for example, would likely be divided into seven batches weighing 3 tons each or six batches
weighing 3.5 tons each. Scales above the mixer pre-weigh the mix components, which usually
consist of 1) hot aggregate from the dryer, 2) the hot asphalt binder from the heated storage
tanks, and 3) reclaimed asphalt from the cold storage bins. When the first batch is ready, the mix
components are dropped into the mixer. Mixing usually takes about one minute. When mixing
is complete, the hot asphalt concrete is dropped (i.e., loaded) into the transport truck waiting in
the load-out bay under the mixer. While the first batch is in the mixer, the scales are loaded with
a second batch. Just after the first batch is loaded, the second pre-weighed batch is dropped into
the mixer. The process continues until the entire load is mixed and loaded into the transport
truck. From beginning to end, the entire process takes about 5 to 10 minutes depending on the
size of the load
The asphalt temperature as it drops from the mixing chamber to the truck is normally
about 300°F. In an effort to create a "worst case" emissions scenario for these tests, asphalt
temperatures were raised from 300°F to 325°F.
3.1 FACILITY MODIFICATIONS FOR THE TESTING
Specifically for this project, a Temporary Total Enclosure (TTE) was built around the
load-out area. The TTE was built to meet the requirements of Method 204. Fumes from
3-1
-------
Atmosphere
Hot Asphalt Cement
RAP
Vent
~>
Dry Aggregate
Wet Aggregate
Operable
Entry
Doors
Operable Exit
Doors
j Hot Mix Asphalt
^to transport trucks
Exit
Entry
Temporary Total Enclosure (TTE)
oa
Stack
Baghouse
Fan
Rotary Drum
Dryer
Load-out Bay
Mixer
Scales
Atmosphere <- 1 TTE Exhaust Fan
.1
TTE Exhaust Duct
Sampling Location #2
TTE Exhaust Duct
Sampling Location #1
Figure 3.1 Process Flow Schematic, Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts
3-2
-------
asphalt load-out were captured using a hood or "tuning fork" over the truck bed. Gases were
withdrawn from the TTE along a short length of duct where samples were collected. A stack
vented the exhaust gases clear of the area. The floor of the TTE was the unpaved roadway
under the load-out area. To minimize roadway dust in and around the TTE, the roadway was
periodically sprayed with water. In Figure 3.2 a schematic of the TTE is presented. In
Figure 3.3 a schematic of the ventilation system is presented.
3.2 COORDINATION BETWEEN TESTING AND PROCESS OPERATIONS
A TTE, 104 feet long by 16 feet wide by 14 feet high, was built around the load-out bay.
Directly above the load-out area, a "tuning fork" shaped exhaust hood was built into the ceiling
of the TTE. Attached to the outlet end of the exhaust hood was a 23.5 inch square exhaust duct
leading to a 15,000 cfm fan. Manual swing doors were positioned at the entrance and exit of the
TTE. The sequence of events leading up to and through load-out and testing were as follows:
1. At the beginning of the day, the TTE exhaust fan was turned on.
2. With the arrival of the first truck, the TTE entrance doors were opened.
3. The truck pulled into the TTE and was positioned under the mixer in the load-out
bay.
4. A vent hose was placed over the truck exhaust to exclude diesel emissions from
the TTE exhaust system.
5. The entrance and exit doors of the TTE were closed and secured.
6. The scales dropped the first load of mix components into the mixer.
7. The Method 315 runs were started.
8. A second batch of mix components were loaded on the scales.
9. After approximately one minute of mixing, the first batch of asphalt concrete was
loaded into the transport truck.
10. The second batch of mix components were dropped into the mixer, mixed, and
loaded into the transport truck.
11. The third batch was mixed and loaded into the transport truck.
12. The fourth batch was mixed and loaded into the transport truck.
13. The fifth batch was mixed and loaded into the transport truck.
14. The sixth batch was mixed and loaded into the transport truck.
15. The seventh and final batch of asphalt concrete was mixed and loaded into the
transport truck. Note that most loads were seven batch loads totaling between 20
to 25 tons of asphalt concrete. Some loads, however, were smaller and were
made up of fewer than seven batches.
16. After the last load, the Method 315 testing continued for 15 to 20 seconds and
then stopped when visual observations indicated that load-out emissions had
stopped.
3-3
-------
£7
Figure 3.2 Temporary Total Enclosure
3-4
-------
Top View
Tower
cy
*
Stack
Fan
Side View
Particulate Train
Sampling Port
THC Sampling Port
< I
< I
(»
< >
2-7 7/16"
~
•9-0"-
-4'—6"
¦18'-0"-
-------
17. Once the Method 315 runs were stopped, the exit doors were opened and the
truck was pulled out of the TTE.
18. With the arrival of the second (or next) transport truck, the TTE entrance doors
were opened and the sequence was repeated, starting with Step 3.
Opacity observations were made from the control room during the testing. For each
batch load-out, a distinct, white, moisture-type plume was observed exiting the exhaust stack.
Fifteen to twenty seconds after the load-out was complete, the white plume would dissipate and
then appear again at the start of the next load-out. It should be noted that the observations did
not meet EPA Method 9 criteria with respect to location, periodicity, nor interference due to
moisture. However, the observation was useful in validating load-out operations. This pattern
was observed over and over again and the Method 315 testing was run continuously, starting just
before the first white plume was observed until after the white plume from the last batch
dissipated.
3.3 PROCESS MONITORING DURING TESTING
During the testing, PES personnel monitored and recorded process operations and
measured the temperature of the asphalt concrete just after load-out. This information is
presented in Appendix B and includes for each load: the time of the load, the job number, the
truck number, the mix type, the ticket number, the mix temperature, the stack temperature, the
asphalt temperature, and the tons of asphalt concrete loaded. The mix types produced during the
testing are summarized in Table 3.1. The process temperatures recorded during the testing are
summarized in Table 3 .2. In Table 3 .2, the mix temperature is the temperature of dried
aggregate leaving the dryer and the asphalt temperature is the temperature of asphalt concrete in
the bed of the truck just after load-out. Also included in Appendix B are copies of the plant logs
for each batch loaded. These logs show the weights for each mix component for each
production batch.
3.4 PROCESS SAMPLES
Two samples of the asphalt cement were collected each day during the test program for a
total of six samples. The first sample each day was collected near the beginning of the test run
and the second collected near the end of the test run. All six asphalt cement samples were
analyzed twice for volatile content: 1) following the procedures of ASTM D 1754 - Effects of
Heat and Air on Asphalt Materials (Thin Film Oven Test) and 2) following the procedures of
ASTM D 2872 - Effects of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin Film Oven
Test). The results of these tests are shown in Table 3.2.
Both ASTM D 1754 and ASTM D 2872 specify an oven temperature of 325 °F. Three
of the asphalt cement samples (one from each day) were analyzed 1) using ASTM D 1754
3-6
-------
TABLE 3.1
PRODUCTION DATA, ASPHALT PLANT D
Test Date
Mix Description 1
Mix Type
Total
Total
Weight,
Weight,
pounds
tons
10/05/98
Vi inch binder
2
39,958
19.98
(Test 1)
Binder Mix
8
8,151
4.08
State dense top
16
48,150
24.08
State binder with 10% RAP
30
1,684,356
842.18
Sidewalk
67
50,134
25.07
Total Test 1
1,830,749
915.37
10/06/98
Binder mix
8
80,663
40.33
(Test 2)
State dense top
16
144,154
72.08
Modified top with 10% RAP
24
1,520,852
760.43
3/8 inch top
33
66,745
33.37
Sidewalk
67
20,014
10.01
Total Test 2
1,832,428
916.21
10/07/98
V2 inch binder
2
32,121
16.06
(Test 3)
State dense top
16
144,531
72.27
State binder
18
30,211
15.11
State top with 10% RAP
25
1,368,125
684.06
State binder with 10% RAP
30
48,358
24.18
3/8 inch top
33
72,144
36.07
People's top
60
17,966
8.98
Total Test 3
1,713,456
856.73
Mix formulas are presented at the end of Appendix B.
3-7
-------
TABLE 3.2
PROCESS DATA, ASPHALT PLANT D
Asphalt
Loaded
During Test
Mass Change of
Asphalt at 325°F, %
Asphalt
Temp. At
Load-out
Dry
Aggregate
Mix Temp.3
Tons
TFOT1
RTFOT2
°F
°F
10/05/98
915.4
-0.106
-0.204
306.7
377.1
10/06/98
916.2
-0.129
-0.246
325.1
394.5
10/07/98
856.7
-0.143
-0.261
326.7
379.8
Average
896.1
-0.126
-0.237
319.5
383.8
' ASTM D1754-94 - Effects of Heat and Air on Asphalt Materials (Thin Film Oven Test - TFOT)
2 ASTM D2872-88 - Effects of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin Film Oven Test - RTFOT)
3 Temperature of the dry aggregate measured in the mix chute between the dryer and hot elevator
3-8
-------
with an oven temperature of 300° F, 2) using ASTM D 1754 with an oven temperature of
350°F, 3) using ASTM D 2872 with an oven temperature of 300°F, and 4) using ASTM D 2872
with an oven temperature of 350°F. The results of these analyses appear in Appendix B.
Two samples of the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) were collected each day during
the test program for a total of six RAP samples. Three of the samples, one from each day, were
archived and three were analyzed as follows. The asphalt cement in the RAP was separated from
the aggregate following the procedures of ASTM D 2172-88, Quantitative Extraction of
Bitumen from Bituminous Paving Mixtures. The asphalt cement was then recovered from the
extract following the procedures of ASTM D 1856-95a, Recovery of Asphalt from Solution by
Abson Method. The results of these analyses appear in Appendix B.
3.5 CAPTURE OF LARGE DIAMETER MATERIAL
Material captured by the ventilation system included not only the fumes generated from
the hot asphalt, but some quantity of small (visible to the naked eye) dust. The evidence of
capture of this dust could be seen on the screens that covered the hood openings that faced the
drop chute. Of the eight screens that covered the hood openings, the two center screens on each
side had a significant build up of asphalt product. This buildup was greatest at the bottom of the
screens. The buildup was caused by the pug mill paddles, which tossed some of the asphalt to
the sides. Although two steel plates were installed in an attempt to eliminate the impaction of the
asphalt on the hood, they did not extend far enough to completely eliminate this impaction.
Observations of the load-outs confirmed the potential for impaction. The two end screens on
each side of the hood did not have as much buildup as the center screens. Additional evidence of
the capture of this dust was seen on the particulate collected by the filters of the Method 315
trains. In addition to the fine particulate typical of asphalt fume emissions, there was particulate
of a size that was readily visible as individual grains of material. It is estimated that the size of
the individual grains was approximately 0.1 millimeters in diameter.
3-9
-------
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Emissions testing was conducted in the TTE exhaust duct to determine uncontrolled
emissions of PM and MCEM from the load-out operation at Asphalt Plant D in Barre,
Massachusetts. The TTE exhaust duct is discussed below.
4.1 TTE EXHAUST DUCT
The TTE exhaust duct was a horizontal 23.5-inch square duct that led from the TTE
exhaust hood to the TTE exhaust fan. Two sets of sampling ports were installed in the side of
the duct as shown in Figure 4.1. For isokinetic testing at Location 1, a 24-point traverse matrix
consisting of six traverse points on each of four parallel traverse lines were used. For isokinetic
testing at Location 2, a 12-point traverse matrix consisting of three points on each of four
parallel lines were used. The results of the EPA Method 1 calculations and locations of the
traverse points are presented in Figures 4.2 and 4.3 for Locations 1 and 2, respectively.
Prior to testing, the TTE exhaust was checked for the presence of non-parallel flow by
recording yaw angle misalignment at each isokinetic sampling point as specified in Section 2.4
of Method 1. The average yaw angle at each location was found to be 6°, which is less than the
EPA requirement of 20°.
4-1
-------
To Atmosphere
23 2
23 2
23 2
23 2
From TTE
Section B-B
Section A-A
* Note port hole diameter was 3 in.
261
Location 2
Location 1
108
133
Fan
Ground Level
336"
Figure 4.1 TTE Exhaust Sampling Port Locations, Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D
-------
t
<
6
5
4
3
2
1
3
6
5
4
3
2
1
3
23 Vfe"
6
5
4
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
1
~
>
f
23 v2"
* Note port hole diameter was 3 in.
Traverse Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distance from
Duct Wall, inches
1 ls/i6
5 7/l6
9 %
13 3/4
17 5/8
21 9/i6
Figure 4.2 TTE Exhaust Traverse Point Locations, Location 1, Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant D
4-3
-------
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
->1
23 1/2"
23 1/2"
* Note port hole diameter was 3 in.
Traverse Point
Number
1
2
3
Distance from
Duct Wall, inches
3 %
11 3/4
19 9/l6
Figure 4.3 TTE Exhaust Traverse Point Locations, Location 2, Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant D
4-4
-------
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Source sampling was performed in the TTE exhaust to determine the concentrations
and mass emission rates of particulate matter (PM) and methylene chloride extractable matter
(MCEM). Three tests were performed over three consecutive days beginning on October 5,
1998. Each test started early in the morning, ran most of the day, and included most of the
plant's production for the day. For each test, two simultaneous Method 315 runs were
performed. Each run consisted of four hours of sampling over a period of six and one-half
hours. Sampling starts and stops coincided with load-out operations as discussed in
Section 3.0. The sampling and analytical methods that were used are summarized in Table 5.1.
Brief descriptions of the sampling and analysis procedures used are presented below. Copies of
all the methods which were used are presented in Appendix G.
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/VELOCITY
TRAVERSE POINTS
EPA Method 1, "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources," was used to
position velocity and sample traverse point locations. The process ductwork and the locations
of measurement sites and traverse points are discussed in Section 4.0 of this document.
5.2 DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
EPA Method 2, "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
(Type S Pitot Tube)," was used to determine exhaust gas velocity. A Type S Pitot tube,
constructed according to Method 2 criteria and having an assigned coefficient of 0.84, was
connected to an inclined-vertical manometer. The pitot tube was inserted into the duct and the
velocity pressure (Ap) was recorded at each traverse point. The effluent gas temperature was
also recorded at each traverse point using a Type-K thermocouple. The average exhaust gas
velocity was calculated from the average square roots of the velocity pressure, average exhaust
gas temperature, exhaust gas molecular weight, and absolute stack pressure. The volumetric
flow rate was calculated as the product of velocity and the cross-sectional area of the duct at
the sampling location.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5.1
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
ASPHALT PLANT D, BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Sampling
Location
Parameter
Test Methods
No. of
Tests
Minimum Run
Times. Minutes
TTE Exhaust
(Location 1)
Flow Rate
EPA 1&2
3
240
Moisture
EPA 4
3
240
PM/MCEM
EPA Method 315
3
240
TTE Exhaust
(Location 2)
Flow Rate
EPA 1&2
3
240
Moisture
EPA 4
3
240
PM/MCEM
EPA Method 315
3
240
5-2
-------
5.3
DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT
The exhaust gas drawn from the TTE and into the exhaust duct during load out was
essentially ambient air. Correspondingly, the exhaust gas was assigned the dry molecular
weight of ambient air (28.84 g/g-mol).
5.4 DETERMINATION OF EXHAUST GAS MOISTURE CONTENT
EPA Method 4, "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases," was used to
determine the flue gas moisture content. EPA Method 4 was performed in conjunction with
each EPA Method 315 test run. Integrated, multi-point, isokinetic sampling was performed.
Condensed moisture was determined by recording pre-test and post-test weights of the
impingers, reagents, and silica gel.
5.5 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER AND METHYLENE
CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER
EPA Method 315, "Determination of Particulate Matter (PM) and Methylene Chloride
Extractable Matter (MCEM) Emissions from Stationary Sources," was used to collect PM and
MCEM samples in the TTE exhaust duct. Multi-point integrated samples were extracted
isokinetically from a total of 24 traverse points at Location 1 (on runs M315-6, M315-7, and
M315-8) and a total of 12 traverse points at Location 2 (on runs M315-1, M315-2, and M315-3).
Each point was sampled for 10 minutes at Location 1 for a minimum net run time of
240 minutes, and 20 minutes at Location 2 for a minimum net run time of 240 minutes.
Readings were taken and recorded every 5 minutes. If load-out continued past the scheduled
completion of sampling at the last point in a port, testing continued until load-out was
completed. This additional testing increased the net run times by as much as 11 minutes for
some runs.
The Method 315 samples were extracted through a glass nozzle, a heated glass-lined
probe, a heated glass fiber filter, and a series of chilled impingers. The first and second
impinger each contained 100 milliliters (mL) of deionized (DI) water. The third impinger
remained empty. The fourth and final impinger contained 200 grams of silica gel. A schematic
of the EPA Method 315 sampling train is shown in Figure 5.1.
The samples were analyzed according to EPA Method 315. Each component of the front
half of the sample train was dried and weighed to give particulate matter results. All
components were then extracted with methylene chloride to give MCEM results.
5-3
-------
T«mp»r»tur»
S»»or pralx
«=
-------
5.6
MCEM DEPOSITION ON THE CEILING OF THE TTE
MCEM deposition on the ceiling of the TTE was estimated as follows. The ceiling of
the TTE was divided into five equal areas. Before the start of the test program, five clean
plates and five C-channel sections were attached to the ceiling of the TTE, one each near the
center of each equal area. The plates were positioned to represent the TTE ceiling. The
C-channels were positioned to represent the structural beams supporting the ceiling. At the
end of the test program, the plates and C-channels were removed and cleaned with acetone.
Each of the ten samples was then analyzed following the procedures of Method 315 producing
five MCEM plate results and five MCEM C-channel results. Total ceiling deposition was
calculated by multiplying each MCEM plate result by a ratio of areas equal to the ceiling area
divided by the test plate area. Total C-channel deposition was calculated by multiplying each
MCEM C-channel result by a ratio of areas equal to total C-channel area divided by the test
C-channel area. Note that both plate and C-channel field blank samples were collected and
analyzed and show over 90% sample recovery for these measurements. Refer to Appendix D
for more details.
5.7 MCEM DEPOSITION INSIDE THE TTE EXHAUST DUCT
A procedure similar to the ceiling procedure described above was used to estimate the
MCEM deposition inside the TTE exhaust duct. Instead of installing plates and C-channels,
however, sections of the duct were cleaned before the test program and again after the testing
was finished. Refer to Appendix D for more details.
5-5
-------
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
For any environmental measurement, a degree of uncertainty exists in the data
generated due to the inherent limitations of the measurement system employed. The goals of a
QA/QC program are to ensure, to the highest degree possible, the accuracy of the data
collected. This section summarizes the QA/QC procedures that were employed by PES in the
performance of this test program. The procedures contained in the reference test methods and
in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III,
Stationary Source Specific Methods, EPA/600/R-94/038c, served as the basis for performance
for all testing and related work activities in this project.
6.1 CALIBRATION AND PREPARATION OF APPARATUS
Brief descriptions of the calibration procedures used by PES are presented below. The
results of equipment and sensor calibrations may be found in Appendix F. Detailed
procedures as presented in the EPA test methods are presented in Appendix G.
6.1.1 Barometers
PES used barometric pressure values reported by a nearby National Weather Service
station.
6.1.2 Temperature Sensors
Bimetallic dial thermometers and Type K thermocouples were verified using the
procedure described in Calibration Procedure 2 of EPA/600/R-94/038c. Each temperature
sensor was checked over the expected range of use against an ASTM 3C or 3F thermometer.
Table 6.1 summarizes the type of calibrations performed, the acceptable levels of variance,
and the results. Digital thermocouple displays were calibrated using a thermocouple simulator
having a range of 0-2400°F.
Dial Thermometers were used to determine asphalt product temperature. The
thermometers were checked against a mercury-in-glass thermometer standard. The results of
the calibration checks are presented in Table 6.1.
6-1
-------
TABLE 6.1
SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA
Temp.
Sensor
I.D.
Temperature, °F
Temperature
Difference*
Usage
Reference
Sensor
Tolerance
RT-6
Stack Gas
32
32
0.00%
<±1.5%
72
69
-0.56%
<±1.5%
210
210
0.00%
<±1.5%
ES-1
Stack Gas
32
32
0.00%
<±1.5%
72
72
0.00%
<±1.5%
210
210
0.00%
<±1.5%
MB-11
Meter Box
Inlet
32
74
32
74
0.00%
0.00%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
210
208
-0.30%
<±1.0%
Meter Box
Outlet
32
74
32
74
0.00%
0.00%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
208
208
0.00%
<±1.0%
MB-10
Meter Box
Inlet
33
76
34
76
0.20%
0.00%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
206
205
-0.15%
<±1.0%
Meter Box
Outlet
32
76
34
76
0.41%
0.00%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
206
205
-0.15%
<±1.0%
" Calculated using the absolute temperature, °R.
6-2
-------
TABLE 6.1 (CONTINUED)
SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA
Temp.
Sensor
Temperature, °F
Temperature
I.D.
Usage
Reference
Sensor
Difference8
Tolerance
RMB-15
Meter Box
Inlet
33
74
35
74
0.41%
0.00%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
208
210
0.30%
<±1.0%
Meter Box
Outlet
33
74
33
75
0.00%
0.19%
<±1.0%
<±1.0%
208
208
0.00%
<±1.0%
T-l
Asphalt
32
32
0.00%
<±1.5%
69
69
0.00%
<±1.5%
212
212
0.00%
<±1.5%
T-2
Asphalt
32
32
0.00%
<±1.5%
69
69
0.00%
<±1.5%
212
212
0.00%
<±1.5%
T-3
Asphalt
32
32
0.00%
<±1.5%
69
69
0.00%
<±1.5%
212
212
0.00%
<±1.5%
" Calculated using the absolute temperature, °R.
6-3
-------
6.1.3 Pitot Tubes
PES used Type S pitot tubes constructed according to EPA Method 2 specifications.
Each pitot tube was inspected for conformance to the geometric specifications by the
application of Calibration Procedure 2 of EPA/600/R-94/038c. Pitot tubes that meet these
requirements are assigned a pitot coefficient, Cp, of 0.84. The dimensional criteria and results
for each pitot tube used are presented in Table 6.2.
6.1.4 Differential Pressure Gauges
PES used Dwyer inclined/vertical manometers to measure differential pressures. The
differential pressure measurements included velocity pressure, static pressure, and meter
orifice pressure. Manometers were selected with sufficient sensitivity to accurately measure
pressures over the entire range of expected values. Manometers are primary standards and
require no calibration.
6.1.5 EPA Method 315 Drv Gas Meters and Orifices
The EPA Method 315 dry gas meters and orifices were calibrated in accordance with
Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 of EPA Method 5. This procedure involves direct comparison of the
metered volume passed through the dry gas meter to a reference dry test meter. The reference
dry test meter is calibrated annually using a wet test meter. Before its initial use in the field
and annually thereafter, the metering system is calibrated over the entire range of operation as
specified in EPA Method 5. Acceptable tolerances for the individual dry gas meter correction
factor (y) and orifice calibration factor (AH@) during initial or annual calibrations are ±0.02
and ±0.20 from the average, respectively. After field use, a calibration check of the metering
system was performed at a single intermediate setting based on the previous field test. The
post-test calibration check of the dry gas meter correction factor must agree within five
percent of the correction factor generated during the initial or annual calibration. The results
for the gas meters and orifices used in this test program are summarized in Table 6.3.
6-4
-------
TABLE 6.2
SUMMARY OF PITOT TUBE DIMENSIONAL DATA
Results
Measurement
Criteria
Pitot Tube Identification
RP-19
ES-1
a,
<10°
0
0
a2
<10°
1
1
PI
<5°
0
0
P2
A
Ln
o
1
0
Y
-
0
1
0
-
0
1
A
-
0.938
1.031
Z
< 0.125 in.
0
0.0175
w
< 0.03125 in.
0
0.0175
Dt
0.1875in. < Dt^ 0.375 in.
0.375
0.375
(A/2)/Dt
01.05 Dt ^ A/2 < 1.50 Dt
1.25
1.37
Acceptable
Yes
Yes
Assigned Coefficient
0.84
0.84
6-5
-------
TABLE 6.3
SUMMARY OF DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA
Meter
No.
Dry Gas Meter Correction Factor, y
Orifice Coefficient, AH^
Pre-test
Post-test
% DifT.
EPA Criteria
Average
Range
EPA Criteria
11
0.987
0.991
0.41%
±5%
1.93
1.87-1.97
1.73-2.13
15
1.000
1.000
0.0%
±5%
1.90
1.86-1.92
1.70-2.10
6.2 REAGENTS AND GLASSWARE PREPARATION
Sample reagents consisted of pesticide (or better) grade acetone and methylene
chloride for glassware preparation and sample recoveries. Water used in sample recoveries
and the impinger trains was HPLC-grade reagent water.
6.3 ON-SITE SAMPLING
The on-site QA/QC activities are described below.
6.3.1 Measurement Sites
Prior to sampling, the duct was checked dimensionally to determine measurement site
locations, location of velocity and sample test ports, inside duct dimensions, and sample
traverse point locations. Inside duct dimensions were checked through each traverse line to
ensure uniformity of the stack/duct inside diameter. The inside duct dimensions, wall
thickness, and sample port depths were measured to the nearest 1/16 inch.
6.3.2 Velocity Measurements
All velocity measurement apparatus were assembled, leveled, zeroed, and leak-checked
prior to use and at the end of each determination. The static pressure was determined at a
single point near the center of the duct cross-section.
6.3.3 Moisture
The Method 315 trains were used to determine stack gas moisture. During sampling,
the exit gas of the last impinger was maintained below 68 °F to ensure adequate condensation
of the exhaust gas water vapor. The total moisture was determined on-site gravimetrically
using an electronic platform balance with 0.1 gram sensitivity.
6-6
-------
6.3.4 EPA Method 315
The field sampling QA/QC for EPA Method 315 began in the sample recovery area. The
sample trains were set up and leak-checked to verify sample train integrity before transport to
the sampling sites. At the sampling sites, the sample trains were leak checked a second time.
Leaks found in excess of 0.02 cubic feet per minute (cfm) were corrected prior to beginning the
test runs. Leak checks were also conducted before and after any sample train component
changes and upon completion of the test runs. Table 6.4 summarizes the EPA Method 315 field
sampling QA/QC measurements and EPA's acceptability criteria.
In addition to the samples, reagent blanks and field blank samples were collected.
Reagent blanks were collected for acetone, methylene chloride, and filter media. An EPA
Method 315 sampling train was assembled and transported to each sampling location, and leak-
checked. The sample trains were then recovered using the same procedures employed during
the recovery of the sample trains used during actual sample runs. The collected fractions were
transferred to labeled, pre-cleaned sample bottles, transported to the subcontract laboratory, and
analyzed in the same manner as the collected samples. Results are shown in Table 6.5.
6.4 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL QA/QC PROCEDURES
6.4.1 Analysis of Blank Samples
The Method 315 blank samples were analyzed following the procedures of EPA Method
315. Field blanks and laboratory blanks were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the sample
train clean-up procedures and to check for contamination of the reagent materials. The results of
these blank analyses are presented in Table 6.5.
6.5 QA COORDINATOR FIELD AUDIT
To meet the goals of the Quality Control Program as described in the QAPP, PES
supplied an on-site QA Coordinator to observe the emission testing and to audit the personnel,
equipment, procedures, and record keeping. The QA Coordinator assured that all sampling train
glassware and sample recovery apparatus were preconditioned following the procedures of
Method 315. Prior to testing, the QA Coordinator oversaw pre-test calibration and the checking
of the equipment. These procedures included checks on the dry gas meters, pitot tubes,
thermocouples, and sampling nozzles.
During the testing, audits and observations were conducted at regular intervals giving
ample opportunity for on-site corrections. The QA Coordinator oversaw the checks and audits
of sampling, data acquisition, sample recovery, and chain of custody. The QA Coordinator also
recorded his observations on standardized forms, copies of which appear in Appendix F.
6-7
-------
TABLE 6.4
SUMMARY OF EPA METHOD 315 FIELD SAMPLING QA/QC DATA
Run No.
M315-1
M315-2
M315-3
M315-6
M315-7
M315-8
Site
TTE
Exhaust
TTE
Exhaust
TTE
Exhaust
TTE
Exhaust,
Duplicate
TTE
Exhaust,
Duplicate
TTE
Exhaust,
Duplicate
Date
10/05/98
10/06/98
10/07/98
10/05/98
10/06/98
10/07/98
Pre-Test Leak Rate, acfma
0.009
0.011
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
Post-Test Leak Rate, acfm
0.005
0.001
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.001
EPA Criteria, acfm
< 0.020
< 0.020
< 0.020
<0.020
< 0.020
<0.020
Percent Isokinetic
90.0
97.9
98.6
95.9
100.2
99 8
EPA Criteria
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
1 Actual cubic feet per minute.
-------
TABLE 6.5
SUMMARY OF EPA METHOD 315 BLANK SAMPLE CATCHES
Blank*
Mass of
Residue
Volume
of Blank
fml-l
Concentration
of Blank
fmp/mp^b
Acetone Wash Blank
0.2
250.7
1.0E-06
Methylene Chloride Blank
0.1
209.1
3.6E-07
Filter Blank
0.0
N/A
0.0
Field Blank 1, Filter - PM
0.0
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 1, Filter -MCEM
0.0
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 1, FH Acetone Rinse - PM
0.4
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 1, FH MeCl Rinse - MCEM
0.1
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 1, BH Solvent Rinse - MCEM
0.0
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 1, Impinger/H20 Rinse - MCEM
0.4
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, Filter - PM
0.0
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, Filter -MCEM
0.0
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, FH Acetone Rinse - PM
0.8
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, FH MeCl Rinse - MCEM
0.1
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, BH Solvent Rinse - MCEM
0.2
N/A
N/A
Field Blank 2, Impinger/H20 Rinse - MCEM
0.1
N/A
N/A
a FH = Front Half, BH = Back Half
b Calculated using the EPA Method 315 given densities for acetone and methylene chloride of
785.1 mg/mL and 1,316.8 mg/mL, respectively.
6-9
-------
APPENDIX A
PM AND MCEM TEST RESULTS
-------
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results
EPA Method 315 - Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
TTE Exhaust
Location 2
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts
Page 1 of 2
RUN NUMBER
M315-1
M315-2
M315-3
RUN DATE
10/5/98
10/6/98
10/7/98
Average
RUNTIME 0721-1403
0714-1326 0636-1313
MEASURED DATA
Y
Meter Box Correction Factor
1.001
1.001
1.001
1.001
AH
Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20
2.01
1.53
1.50
1 68
P bar
Barometric Pressure, inches Hg
30.30
30.45
30.43
30.39
Vm
Sample Volume, ft3
159.115
160.833
162.172
160.707
Tm
Average Meter Temperature, °F
52.7
44.5
44.3
47.2
Pstatic
Stack Static Pressure, inches H20
-7.0
-7.0
-7.2
-7.1
Ts
Average Stack Temperature, °F
59.0
56.9
53.8
56.6
V,c
Condensate Collected, ml
24.3
17.1
23.2
21.5
C02
Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o2
Oxygen content, % by volume
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
n2
Nitrogen content, % by volume
79.1
79.1
79.1
79.1
Cp
Pitot Tube Coefficient
0 84
0.84
0.84
0.84
Ap1/2
1/2
Average Square Root Ap, (in. H20)
1.1892
1.0852
1.0719
1.1154
©
Sample Run Duration, minutes
240.0
247.5
250.7
246.1
Dn
Nozzle Diameter, inches
0.188
0.188
0.188
0.188
Tons of asphalt loaded per test period
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
CALCULATED DATA
An
Nozzle Area, ft2
0.000193
0 000193
0.000193
0.000193
^m(std)
Standard Meter Volume, dscf
166.863
172.033
173.427
170.774
^m(std)
Standard Meter Volume, dscm
4.725
4.871
4.911
4.836
Ps
Stack Pressure, inches Hg
29.79
29.94
29.90
29.87
Bws
Moisture, % by volume
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
^ws(sat)
Moisture (at saturation), % by volume
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.5
^wstd
Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft3
1.142
0.805
1.092
1.013
1-Bws
Dry Mole Fraction
0.993
0.995
0.994
0.994
Md
Molecular Weight (d b ), Ib/lb'mole
28.84
28.84
28 84
28.84
Ms
Molecular Weight (w.b.), Ib/lb-mole
28.76
28.79
28.77
28.77
Vs
Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s
66.5
60.4
59.5
62.1
A
Stack Area, ft2
3.835
3.835
3.835
3.835
Qa
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm
15,295
13,889
13,689
14,291
Qs
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm
15,378
14,123
13,964
14,488
Qs(cmm)
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm
435.4
399.9
395.42
410.3
I
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
90.0
97.9
98.6
95.5
2
-------
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results
EPA Method 315 - Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
TTE Exhaust, Location 2
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D, Barre, Massachusetts
Page 2 of 2
RUN NUMBER
M315-1
M315-2
M315-3
RUN DATE
10/05/98
10/06/98
10/07/98
Average
RUN TIME
0721-1403
0714-1326
0636-1313
EMISSIONS DATA
Particulate Matter
PM
Target Catch, g
0.0179
0.0303
0.0158
CpM
Concentration, gr/dscf
1.66E-03
2.72E-03
1.41E-03
1.93E-03
Cpm
Concentration, g/dscm
3.79E-03
6.22E-03
3.22E-03
4.41 E-03
Emission Rate, lb/test period
8.73E-01
1.36E+00
7.03E-01
9.78E-01
Emission Rate, lb/ton
9.77E-04
1.48E-03
8.21 E-04
1.09E-03
Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
Mcem
Target Catch, g
0.0042
0.0018
0.0019
Cmcem
Concentration, gr/dscf
3.88E-04
1.61 E-04
1.69E-04
2.40E-04
Cmcem
Concentration, g/dscm
8.89E-04
3.70E-04
3.87 E-04
5.48E-04
Emission Rate, lb/test period
2.05E-01
8.06E-02
8.46E-02
1.23E-01
Emission Rate, lb/ton
2.29E-04
8.80E-05
9.87E-05
1.39E-04
H
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-1
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
Ma
Pa
Va
ca
vaw
wa
Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Density of acetone, mg/mL
Volume of acetone blank, mL
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Volume of acetone used in wash, mL
Acetone wash blank, mg
Container
Number
Final weight
grams
169.7918
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
169.4491
Tare of
filter, g
0.3409
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
91.8
0.073
Weight Gain
grams
0.0018
111.26945
111.2533
Total
0.0162
0.0180
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams :
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg :
18.0
17.9
0.072
'Note
MeCI Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations
Container
Final weight
Tare of
Weight Gain
Number
in grams
dish, g
grams
1
1.6693
1.6680
0.0013
2+2M
1.6386
1.6371
0.0015
3W
1.6567
1.6558
0.0009
3S
1.6595
1.6588
0.0007
Total
0.0044
totals from line above are:
mtotai in mg
4.4
Acetone Wash
Volume, mL
MeCI Wash
Volume, mL
90.15
181.95
sum of Vaw, mL
181.95
90.15
170.15
sum of V^, mL
170.15
Sample Data
QC limit
wa
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.145
0.143
M,
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
v,
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
W,
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.08
0.358
Fb
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
4.2
'The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
Sample M315-1
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-2
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
M„
Pa
V,
C.
V,w
w,
Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Density of acetone, mg/mL
Volume of acetone blank, mL
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Volume of acetone used in wash, ml_
Acetone wash blank, mg
Container
Number
Final weight
grams
167.6932
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
167.3514
Tare of
filter, g
0.3363
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
175.3
0.140
Weight Gain
grams
0.0055
103.74945
103.7245
0.0249
0.0304
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg
30.4
30.3
0.138
*Note
MeC Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations
Container Final weight
Number
2+2M
3W
3S
in grams
Tare of
dish, g
1.6663
1.6659
1.6392
1.6387
1.6606
1.6600
1.6660
1.6655
Weight Gain Acetone Wash
totals from line above are:
grams
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
Volume, mL
MeCI Wash
Volume, mL
0.0005
85.4
85.4
0.0020
260.7
183.9
mtoui in mg
2
sum of Vaw, mL
260.7
sum of Vtw, mL
183.9
Sample Data
QC limit
w,
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.21
0.205
M»
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
v«
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
Wt
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.09
0.387
Fb
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
1.7
"Note
"The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
Sample M315-2
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-3
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
Ma
Pa
Va
C,
V,w
w,
Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Density of acetone, mg/mL
Volume of acetone blank, mL
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Volume of acetone used in wash, mL
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
164.8
0.131
Container
Number
Final weight
grams
168.1872
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
167.8462
Tare of
filter, g
0.3391
Weight Gain
grams
0.0019
102.7281
102.7141
0.0140
0.0159
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams :
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg :
15.9
15.8
0.129
'Note
MeCI Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations
Container
Final weight
Tare of
Weight Gain
Acetone Wash
MeCI Wash
Number
in grams
dish, g
grams
Volume, mL
Volume, mL
1
1.6664
1.6658
0.0006
2+2M
1.6581
1.6578
0.0003
164.8
8&5|
3W
1.6649
1.6645
3S
1.6545
1.6537
0.0008
63.2
63.2
Total
0.0021
228
151.7
totals from line above are:
mtotal in mg
sum of Vaw, mL
sum of V^, mL
2.1
228
151.7
Sample Data
QC limit
wa
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.18
0.179
Mt
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
vt
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
wt
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.07
0.320
F„
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
1.8
*The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
Sample M315-3
-------
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results
EPA Method 315 - Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
TTE Exhaust, Location 1
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D - Barre, Massachusetts
Page 1 of 2
RUN NUMBER
M315-6
M315-7
M315-8
RUN DATE
10/5/98
10/6/98
10/7/98
Average
RUNTIME
0721-1403 0714-1326
0636-1313
MEASURED DATA
y
Meter Box Correction Factor
0.9802
0.9802
0.9802
0.980
AH
Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20
2.07
1.92
1.68
1.89
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, inches Hg
30.30
30.45
30.43
30.39
vm
Sample Volume, ft3
176.641
168.879
159.567
168.362
Tm
Average Meter Temperature, °F
53.7
46.8
45.9
48.8
P
' static
Stack Static Pressure, inches H20
-7.0
-7.0
-7.2
-7.1
Ts
Average Stack Temperature, °F
60.1
57.6
55.2
57.7
V,c
Condensate Collected, ml
23.8
12.2
24.3
20.1
co2
Carbon Dioxide content, % by volum
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o2
Oxygen content, % by volume
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
n2
Nitrogen content, % by volume
79.1
79.1
79.1
79.1
Cp
Pitot Tube Coefficient
0.84
0.84
0.84
0 84
AP1'2
Average Square Root Ap, (in. H20)1/2
1 1983
1.1250
1.0328
1.1187
©
Sample Run Duration, minutes
240.0
246.9
250.1
245.7
Dn
Nozzle Diameter, inches
0.189
0.185
0.187
0.187
Tons of asphalt loaded per test perio
893.5
916.2
856.7
888.8
CALCULATED DATA
An
Nozzle Area, ft2
0.000195
0.000187
0.000191
0.000191
^m(std)
Standard Meter Volume, dscf
181.042
176.253
166.637
174.644
Vm(std)
Standard Meter Volume, dscm
5.127
4.991
4.719
4.945
Ps
Stack Pressure, inches Hg
29.79
29.94
29.90
29.87
Bws
Moisture, % by volume
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.5
Bws(sat)
Moisture (at saturation), % by volum
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.6
^wstd
Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft3
1.120
0.574
1.144
0.946
1-Bws
Dry Mole Fraction
0.994
0.997
0.993
0.995
Md
Molecular Weight (d.b ), lb/lb*mole
28.84
28 84
28.84
28 84
Ms
Molecular Weight (w.b ), lb/lb»mole
28.77
28.80
28.76
28.78
Vs
Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s
67.0
62.6
57.4
62.3
A
Stack Area, ft2
3.835
3.835
3.835
3.835
Qa
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm
15,427
14,404
13,210
14,347
Qs
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm
15,488
14,646
13,431
14,522
Qs(cmtn)
I
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm
438.6
414.7
380 33
411.2
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
95.9
100.2
99.8
98.6
-------
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results
EPA Method 315 - Particulate and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
TTE Exhaust, Location 1
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D - Barre, Massachusetts
Page 2 of 2
RUN NUMBER
M315-6
M315-7
M315-8
RUN DATE
10/05/98
10/06/98
10/07/98
Average
RUN TIME
0721-1403
0714-1326
0636-1313
EMISSIONS DATA
Particulate Matter
PM
Target Catch, g
0.0348
0.0419
0.0122
CpM
Concentration, gr/dscf
2.97E-03
3.67E-03
1.13E-03
2.59E-03
Cpm
Concentration, g/dscm
6.79E-03
8.40E-03
2.59E-03
5.92E-03
Emission Rate, lb/test period
1.58E+00
1.90E+00
5.42E-01
1.34E+00
Emission Rate, lb/ton
1.76E-03
2.07E-03
6.33E-04
1.49E-03
Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
Mqem
Target Catch, g
0.0052
0.0043
0.0030
Cmcem
Concentration, gr/dscf
4.43E-04
3.76E-04
2.78E-04
3.66E-04
Cmcem
Concentration, g/dscm
1.01E-03
8.62E-04
6.36E-04
8.37E-04
Emission Rate, lb/test period
2.35E-01
1.94E-01
1.33E-01
1.88E-01
Emission Rate, lb/ton
2.63E-04
2.12E-04
1.56E-04
2.10E-04
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-6
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
Ma
Pa
V,
C.
Vaw
W,
Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Density of acetone, mg/mL
Volume of acetone blank, mL
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Volume of acetone used in wash, mL
Acetone wash blank, mg
Container
Number
1A
Final weight
grams
168.1073
168.2777
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
167.7654
167.9357
Tare of
filter, g
0.3403
0.3362
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
90.1
0.072
Weight Gain
grams
0.0016
113.6695
113.642
Total
0.0058
0.0275
0.0349
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams:
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg •
34.9
34.8
0.071
*Note
| MeCI Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations |
Container
Final weight
Tare of
Weight Gain
Acetone Wash
MeCI Wash
Number
in grams
dish, g
grams
Volume, mL
Volume, mL
1A
1.6677
1.6673
0.0004
1B
1.6718
1.6712
0.0006
2+2M
1.6445
1.6430
0.0015
3W
1.6758
1.6742
0.0016
3S
1.6666
1.6653
0.0013
Total
0.0054
186.5
187.1
totals from line above are:
mtotai in mg
sum of Vaw, mL
sum of V^, mL
5.4
186.5
187.1
Sample Data
QC limit
w.
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.15
0.146
M,
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
v.
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
W,
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.09
0.394
F„
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
5.2
*The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
U
Sample M315-6
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-7
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
Ma Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Pa Density of acetone, mg/mL
Va Volume of acetone blank, mL
Ca Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Vaw Volume of acetone used in wash, mL
Wa Acetone wash blank, mg
Container
Number
Final weight
grams
168.1264
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
167.7704
Tare of
filter, g
0.3378
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
92.7
0.074
Weight Gain
grams
0.0182
107.1823
107.1585
Total
0.0238
0.0420
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams ;
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg ;
42.0
41.9
0.073
*Note
MeCI Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations
Container Final weight Tare of
Number
2+2M
3W
3S
Total
in grams
1.6638
1.6492
1.6617
1.6673
dish, g
1.6622
1.649
1.6595
1.6668
Weight Gain Acetone Wash MeCI Wash
grams
Volume, mL Volume, mL
0.0016
0.0002
0.0022
0.0005
0.0045
totals from line above are:
mtotai in mg
4.5
91.35
184.05
sum of Vaw, mL
184.05
91.35
180.55
sum of V^, mL
180.55
Sample Data
QC limit
Wa
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.15
0.144
M,
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
v«
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
wt
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.09
0.380
Fb
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
4.3
*Note
"The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
11—
Sample M315-7
-------
EPA Method 315 Catch Weight Calculations
Run Number: M315-8
Particulate Matter (PM) Determinations
Acetone Wash Blank PM Calculations
QC limit
Ma
Pa
V.
C,
Vaw
W,
Mass of residue of acetone, mg
Density of acetone, mg/mL
Volume of acetone blank, mL
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg
Volume of acetone used in wash, mL
Acetone wash blank, mg
Container
Number
Final weight
grams
168.04845
Tare of dish
or beaker, g
167.7067
Tare of
filter, g
0.3390
0.2
785.1
250.7
1.0E-06
129.8
0.104
Weight Gain
grams
0.0027
102.9602
102.9506
0.0096
0.0123
Total particulate catch weight, in milligrams
Total particulate minus the acetone blank (Wa), mg :
12.3
12.2
0.102
*Note
MeCI Extractable Matter (MCEM) Determinations
Container Final weight Tare of Weight Gain Acetone Wash MeCI Wash
Number
2+2M
3W
3S
Total
in grams
1.6697
1.6483
1.6672
1.6768
dish, g
1.6681
1.648
1.6665
1.6762
grams
Volume, mL Volume, mL
0.0016
0.0003
0.0007
0.0006
0.0032
totals from line above are:
mto,ai in mg
3.2
92.7
222.5
sum of Vaw, mL
222.5
92.7
198.1
sum of V^, mL
198.1
Sample Data
QC limit
Wa
Acetone wash blank, mg
0.18
0.175
M,
Mass of residue of MeCI blank, mg
0.1
Pt
Density of MeCI, mg/mL
1316.8
V,
Volume of MeCI blank, mL
209.1
C,
MeCI blank concentration, mg/mg
3.63E-07
Wt
MeCI wash blank, mg
0.09
0.417
Fb
Filter Blank, mg
0.0
Mmcem
Total MeCI Extractable Matter weight, mg
2.9
*Note
*The QC limit value was substracted instead of the calculated acetone wash blank value.
Sample M315-8
-------
Example Calculations
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant D- Barre, Massachusetts
US EPA Method 315 - PM
(Using Data from Run M315-1)
Discrepancies may exist between the computer generated reported results, which use
more significant figures, and the values manually calculated from the displayed values.
Volume of dry gas sampled corrected to standard conditions of 68 °F, 29.92 in. Hg, ft3.
V , = 17.64V y
m(std) ni 1
\ ~ —
bar 13.6
460 + t
m y
vm(sld) = (17.64)059.115)0.001)
30.3 +
2.01
716
460 + 52.7
V , = 166.863 dscf
m(std)
Volume of dry gas sampled corrected to standard conditions of 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg, m3
V V ,,.,(0.028317)
m(std)m m(std)v '
Vm(«d)m> = (166.863) (0.028317)
V ... 3 = 4.725 dscm
Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, ft3.
V , ( = 0.04707V,
w(std) lc
Vw(s,d) = (0.04707)(24.3)
V , , = 1.142 scf
w(std)
Moisture content in stack gas, as measured.
-------
B = (100)
wS 7y * v y
m(std) w(std)
B = — (100)
ws 166.863 + 1.142
B = 0.7
WS
Moisture content in stack gas, at saturation. Used as Bws if lower than measured
moisture.
q = j q(6-691 -(3144/(is. 390,86))) / pg * j Q0
ws(sat)
Q = J Q(6-691 - (3144/(59 • 390.86))) / 29 79 * 100
ws(sat)
B = 1.7
ws(sat)
Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mol.
Md ¦-= 0.44(%C02) + 0.32(%02) + 0.28 (%N2 + %CO)
Md = 0.44(0.0) + 0.32(20.9) + 0.28(79.1 +0)
M. = 28.84 lb/lb-mol
CI
Molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mol.
Ms --- Md(l-Bws/100) + 18(Bws/100)
Ms = 28.84(1-0.7/100) + 18(0.7/100)
M = 28.76 lb/lb-mol
-------
Absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg.
P
p _ p + static
bar 13.6
P = 30.3 +
13.6
Ps = 29.79 inches Hg
Stack velocity at stack conditions, fps.
v - 85.49 C (,/Sp)
S p \V riaVg
t +460
S
M P
S S
V = (85.49) (0.84) (1.1892)
(59.0 + 460)
(28.76)(29.79)
v = 66.5 fps
Isokinetic Variation.
h)(D„2)(e)f,,)(>-|V100)
(166.863) (59.0+ 460) (17.32)
vol -
(66.5) (0.188)2 (240) (29.79) (1-0.7/100)
%\ = 90.0
-------
10. Stack gas volumetric flow rate at stack conditions, aefm.
Qa - (60) (A) (vs)
Qa = (60) (3.835) (66.5)
Q = 15,295 acfm
11. Dry stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dsefm.
p
Q, . = 17.64 Q 5 1 -B /100
^s(stil) va (t + 45O) I ws )
V) = (17"64) (15'295)
( 29.79 ^
59.0 + 460
(1 -0.7/100)
Q,,» - 15,378 dscfm
^¦s(std)
12. Dry stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dsemm.
Q, = Q, 0.028317
s(cmm) ^s(std)
Qs,cmm) = (15'379) (0.028317)
Q , = 435 dsemm
v*
-------
PM concentration, gr/dscf.
gr/dscf = (15.43) ^
V
m(std)m3
. ...... 0.0179
gr/dscf = (15.43)
166.863
gr/dscf = 0.00166 gr/dscf
PM concentration, g/dscm.
g/dscm = ®
^m(std)m3
0.0179
g/dscm =
4.725
g/dscm = 0.00379 g/dscm
PM emission rate, lb/test period.
lb/test period
(9) (8) (Qs(std))
(453.592) (Vm(std))
lb/test period = (240) (0-0179) (15,378)
(453.592) (166.863)
lb/test period = 0.873 lb/test period
-------
PM Emission Rate, lb/ton.
lb/ton = lb per test period
tons of asphalt loaded per test period
lb/,on - MZ3
893.5
lb/ton = 0.000977 lb/ton
-------
Nomenclature
Y
Meter Box Correction Factor
AH
Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, inches Hg
Vm
Sample Volume, ft3
tm
Average Meter Temperature, °F
P
1 static
Stack Static Pressure, inches H20
ts
Average Stack Temperature, °F
Vic
Condensate Collected, ml
C02
Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume
02
Oxygen content, % by volume
N2
Nitrogen content, % by volume
Cp
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Api/2
Average Square Root Ap, (in. H20)1/2
0
Sample Run Duration, minutes
Dn
Nozzle Diameter, inches
An
Nozzle Area, ft2
^m(std)
Standard Meter Volume, dscf
^m(std)m3
Standard Meter Volume, dscm
Ps
Stack Pressure, inches Hg
Bws
Moisture, % by volume
V w(std)
Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft3
1-Bws
Dry Mole Fraction
Md
Molecular Weight, dry, lb/lb*mole
Ms
Molecular Weight, wet, lb/lb*mole
Vs
Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s
A
Stack Area, ft2
Qa
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm
Qs(std)
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm
Qs(cmm)
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dsemm
I
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
gr/dscf
Concentration, g/dscf
g/dscm
Concentration, g/dscm
lb/test period
Emission Rate, pounds per test period
•Z-O
-------
APPENDIX B
PROCESS DATA
-------
PES PRO<
Run No. 1
Data recor
:ess log
- October
ded by Fra
-ASPHAL
5, 1998
nk Phoenix
T PLANT D IN BARRE, MA
START (7)
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET NO.
MIX TEMP. F
STACK TEMP, F
ASPHALT
TEMP, F
ASPHALT
LOADED AND
TESTED. LBS
ASPHALT
LOADED BUT
NOT TESTED,
LBS
COMMENTS
6:24
6:25
9999
2
15
9361
15.896
7
6:29
6 35
3089
LC 757
30
9382
49.054
6:36
6 41
9999
2
16
9383
48,291
6:48
6:54
3069
WAD
30
9384
47,676
6:55
7:00
3089
5G
30
9385
48,178
7:03
7:08
3058
5G 22
18
9386
48,166
7:09
7:18
3009
LC 542
30
9387
66.658
7:21
7:27
3089
LC 751
30
9388
361
247
48.093
7:29
7:39
3089
LC 543
30
9389
417
226
64.180
7:41
7:47
3089
LC 752
30
9390
393
235
48.303
7:57
8:04
3089
LC 757
30
9391
353
186
48.081
8:06
8:15
3089
COS
30
9392
201
115
48.776
8:17
8:23
3089
WAD
30
9393
340
297
48.495
825
8:33
3089
5 G
30
9394
401
249
48.139
8 37
845
3089
LC 542
30
9395
375
229
Same Truck
8:47
8:50
3089
LC 542
30
9395
407
230
66,647
Same Truck (1)
8:56
9:03
3089
LC 543
30
9396
64.143
9:06
9:12
3089
LC 752
30
9397
400
212
48.644
2
9:14
9:20
3089
LC 752
30
9398
364
229
48.398
922
9:27
2959
vou
16
9399
385
220
321
48.150
9:28
9:34
3089
LC 757
30
9400
364
248
320
48,213
9:35
941
3089
WAD
30
9401
355
283
290
46.358
9:42
9:43
9999
3
8
9402
377
247
8.151
3
9:45
9 51
3089
5 G
30
9403
370
249
48.463
4
9:52
10:00
3089
LC 542
30
9404
391
248
66.265
10:01
10:09
3089
LC 543
30
9405
373
245
64,332
10:10
10:17
3089
LC 751
30
9406
378
245
260
46.334
10:16
1022
3089
LC 751
30
9407
290
48.705
10:25
1031
3089
BLK
30
9408
367
231
47,975
10:33
1038
3089
LC 757
30
9409
383
241
294
48.496
10:38
10:39
9999
3
33
9410
12.185
10:41
1043
8888
4
33
9411
290
17.904
10:46
10 51
3089
WAD
30
9412
387
230
48.282
10:54
11:02
3089
5 G
30
9413
270
137
299
Same Truck (5)
11:05
11:06
3089
WAD
30
9413
326
210
48.741
Same Truck
11:08
11:17
3089
LC 542
30
9414
379
254
303
66.365
11:18
11 28
3089
LC 543
30
9415
385
253
64,312
11 29
11 35
3089
LC 751
30
9416
392
251
310
48,613
11:36
11:41
3089
LC 752
30
9417
387
246
310
48.125
11:42
11 48
3089
LC 757
30
9418
407
244
46,319
6
11:48
11:54
2959
BLK
16
9419
313
48.233
11 56
11:59
8888
4
67
9420
396
270
20.149
12:00
12:06
3089
WAD
30
9421
365
285
46,626
12:07
12:13
3089
5 G
30
9422
396
386
48.521
12:14
12:22
3089
LC 542
30
9423
424
263
65.814
12:23
12:30
3089
LC 543
30
9424
396
258
64,724
12:32
12:37
3089
LC 751
30
9425
393
259
48.423
12:40
12.44
9999
2
67
9426
416
269
29,985
12:46
12:51
3089
LC 757
30
9427
449
195
48,445
12:52
12:59
3089
WAD
30
9428
383
259
48.854
13:52
14:03
9999
3
2
9429
39,958
Total
377.1
Total (lbs.)
1,830,749
515.091
Total (tons)
915.4
257.5
Comments
1 Confusion in Control Room. Problem Releasing Material to Mixer, Dump took Longer Than Expected.
2 Truck not Dampered
3 No Truck Exhaust Stack
4 Missed First Dump
5 Kettle Problem
6 Pod Change
7 Note: Two Minute Difference Log Printout Reads Two Minutes Slow.
"2-"2—
Procda~1 .xls
-------
PES PROCESS LOG - ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA A 1 n Art 'T ^
Run No. 1 - October5, 1998 I6~| J
Data recorded by Frank Phoenix > /
START (7)
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET NO.
MIX TEMP. F
STACK TEMP, F
ASPHALT
TEMP. F
ASPHALT
LOADED AND
TESTED, LBS
ir
Asphalt by Mix
COMMENTS
13:52
14:03
9999
3
2
LVALUE!
39.958
39.958
9:42
9:43
9999
3
8
#VALUEI
377
247
8.151
8.151
3
9:22
9:27
2959
YOU
16
0VAUJEI
385
220
321
48.150
48,150
21
7:27
3089
LC 751
30
9388
361
247
48.093
29
7:39
3089
LC 543
30
9389
417
226
64.180
41
7:47
3089
LC 752
30
9390
393
235
48.303
57
6:04
3089
LC 757
30
9391
353
186
46.081
08
8:15
3089
COS
30
9392
201
115
48.776
17
823
3089
WAD
30
9393
340
297
48.495
25
8:33
3089
5 G
30
9394
401
249
48.139
37
8:45
3089
LC 542
30
9395
375
' 229
Same Truck
47
6:50
3089
LC 542
30
9395
407
230
66.647
Same Truck (1)
06
9:12
3089
LC 752
30
9397
400
212
48.644
2
14
9:20
3089
LC 752
30
9398
364
229
46,398
28
9:34
3089
LC 757
30
9399
364
246
320
48,213
35
9:41
3089
WAD
30
9400
355
283
290
46,358
45
9:51
3089
5 G
30
9401
370
249
48.463
4
52
10:00
3069
LC 542
30
9402
391
248
66.265
01
10:09
3089
LC 543
30
9403
373
245
64.332
10
10 17
3069
LC 751
30
9404
378
245
280
48,334
33
10:38
3089
LC 757
30
9409
363
241
294
48.496
25
10:31
3089
BLK
30
9408
367
231
47.975
46
10:51
3089
WAD
30
9412
387
230
48.262
54
11:02
3089
5 G
30
9413
270
137
299
Same Truck (5)
05
11:06
3089
WAD
30
9413
326
210
48.741
Same Truck
08
11.17
3089
LC 542
30
9414
379
254
303
66,365
18
11:28
3069
LC 543
30
9415
365
253
64,312
29
11:35
3069
LC 751
30
9416
392
251
310
48.613
36
11:41
3089
LC 752
30
9417
387
246
310
48.125
42
11:48
3089
LC 757
30
9418
407
244
48.319
6
00
12:06
3089
WAD
30
9421
385
285
48.626
07
1213
3089
5 G
30
9422
396
386
48,521
14
12:22
3089
LC 542
30
9423
424
263
65,814
23
12:30
3069
LC 543
30
9424
396
256
64.724
32
12:37
3089
LC 751
30
9425
393
259
48,423
46
12:51
3089
LC 757
30
9426
449
195
48.445
52
12:59
3089
WAD
30
9427
383
259
46.854
1,664.356
11:56
11:59
6866
4
67
9420
396
270
20.149
12:40
12:44
9999
2
67
9421
416
269
29.985
50,134
Total
376 0
Total (lbs.)
1,830,749
1.830.749
3,661.498
Total (tons)
915.4
9154
Comments
1 Confusion in Control Room. Problem Releasing Material to Mixer. Dump took Longer Than Expected.
2 Truck not Dampered
3 No Truck Exhaust Stack
4 Missed First Dimp
5 Kettle Problem
6 Pod Change
7 Note: Two Minute Difference Log Printout Reads Two Minutes Stow.
Procda~2.xls
-------
Datasheet
fir^ck-
i
¦z.
3
T
¦flW'd'--
T^.
j*
13
1
K
fW
n
if
lc-53
1
<¦4
/I
Zi-
AsprW.-r ffuWT X)
T&rzze ~
i
Date: j o -C
3fc>i/
33sr
wf
><
r
3*3
_22±
*6?-
Z-~H>
•STW^fc
^ TTm^
Z2-&
a^5
a«n
Ai±
121
ZJO
2-1
3-^
ZT-O
AS3
2-H5"
^31
21L
«0
t^
7-tO
/T'y
30
3°
36
3D
30
3o
30
3<-*
30
Ifc fi^i
?c>
3o ^29c
3-0
3G
3o
So ^
3Q fa a\
3-c
.•?o
i?e»
g?
3o
-
f- i
f i
iA ¦
' JL ^
1 ^
llj
<
j
L.
li"
/ o
C i-*'
rpu«-tc-
ajct
OA *^£»<
Szo
A/c Pk^
r-T
*rr*tr •
PuvJT
23
H
u
ih
_2±|
If og
It'- ^
H; *1
H '• 26
-
i> •
>0
i'l-
3>
3^
Of
,»fe
>1 •
iZr.tJQ
1^-0 +-
\> *4-
il- •
l>3V
ir. ^
l>'^
iV'^i-
l
3*
-Ll
JLiii
il - 41
i» • n
m
ii.* IS
|V>V
f2--5\
ILLS1
±L£^.
i-C ^"fi_
3gtcr1
Lc£43
3^r
2S3.
u: ir\
>-
Lc ^fCT^
w
Lc^r^-
Zh*-
^/O?"
30c "1
lvM>
t ^
22k.
24H
^To
^og
73"
j-c r^/z.
40k
j-? $'
7-^t-
ii:
^ogj
_LL£fLL
U 1-s-(
T-i>J>
_2£cl
2—
TTTW
S
T?T
Jii4,
53
HT
W
WftD
^£3
JE
±n.
p^2oOwu^t>»—
o pv~ Li'vtZ
Zc zio
30
C-|—.
!)
2o
3o
3o
5o
Barre Plant Data Sheets
•* ^/s.^ bifffrun,^ UjJft^TvJT t^o
-------
~) ^ L| c .<-/ t<*12
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIMVILLE,BASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
barre,rass.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HONES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cu8t# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# LC 751
Biz# 38
Kaae STATE BINDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9388
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
7:19:05
10
2770
780
740
840
2480
7610
16
355
355
7965
7:19:59
20
2820
820
710
838
2540
7720
13
351
351
16036
7:21:41
20
2880
790
760
790
2480
7700
15
355
355
24091
7:22:47
20
2710
830
750
830
2480
7600
14
351
351
32042
7:23:53
10
2770
800
AM
on
820
2540
7730
13
352
352
40124
7:25:00
-10
2720
790
720
850
2540
7620
14
349
349
48093
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
5
Job Total
129.84
Tiae & Date
07:25:52 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
TVtAoV^"^
Custoaer
LORUSSQ CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAI8VILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBRQOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOMES
CRAMFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cu8tt 1
Jobt
Truck# LC 543
Hit# 38
laae STATE BI1DER 18X RAP
Operator
Tickett 9389
Tin
Agg T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Aso T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Tarqet
2788
888
748
AAA
OTO
2528
352
8888
7
38:17
-18
2818
798
740
788
2518
7638
6
357
357
7987
7
31:88
20
2828
818
778
828
2588
7728
14
358
358
16857
7
32:86
38
2798
828
738
888
2518
7658
15
352
352
24859
7
33:12
28
2818
888
798
810
2548
7758
15
358
358
32159
7
34:18
38
2778
818
788
798
2498
7568
15
358
358
48869
7
35:24
38
2738
780
758
888
2518
7578
15
356
356
47995
7
36:38
38
2888
788
738
828
2578
7780
18
353
353
56848
7
37:37
38
2848
798
768
838
2568
7788
16
352
352
64188
g Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
6
Job Total
161.93
Ti«e & Date
07:38:38 18/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIMVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL KASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
01005
568-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOSES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAM
Custf 1
Job* 3869
Truck# LC 752
Hixf 30
laae STATE B1IOER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9390
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2760
AAA
OOv
746
800
2520
352
8000
7:39:03
20
2720
780
760
820
2580
7660
16
355
355
6035
7:39:51
40
2870
830
756
650
2590
7890
15
350
350
16275
7:41:22
40
2620
610
680
830
2510
7650
16
351
351
24276
7:42:26
50
2660
810
760
820
2460
7710
15
349
349
32335
7:43:34
0
2760
760
780
810
2580
7690
15
351
351
40376
7:44:40
30
2770
790
740
810
2460
7570
15
357
357
46303
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
7
Job Total
168.06
Tiae & Date
87:45:33 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
"C - M
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL KASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RO.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOKES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Cust# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# LC 757
Kit# 30
law STATE BI1DER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9391
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
A9p T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
880
748
800
2520
352
8000
7:56:49
0
2780
820
750
790
2550
7690
7
355
355
8045
7:57:30
30
2820
790
730
820
2490
7650
16
351
351
16046
7:58:37
10
2750
780
770
790
2510
7600
17
350
350
239%
7:59:43
30
2830
AAA
OOv
740
830
2510
7710
15
355
355
32061
8:00:51
20
2810
810
770
820
2540
7750
16
349
349
40160
8:01:57
30
2770
830
700
780
2490
7570
16
351
351
48081
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
8
Job Total
210.12
Tiae & Date
08:02:50 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CENTRAL »A_
OLD COLDBRQOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
81885
548-355-2952
CO.
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE,HASS.
02762
Job
BAY STATE HOBES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Cust*
Job*
Truck*
Kill
Raae
Operator
Ticket*
1
3889
COS
38
STATE BIHDER
18X RAP
9392
TUe
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2788
888
748
888
2528
352
8888
8:88:12
8
2838
888
728
798
2538
7678
9
368
368
8838
8:89:13
28
2778
798
738
798
2528
7688
16
358
358
15988
8:18:19
38
2788
818
778
838
2588
7778
18
358
358
24188
8:11:26
48
2888
788
748
798
2538
7728
18
356
356
32176
8:12:32
48
3868
788
778
858
2528
7988
17
358
358
48586
8:13:38
38
2868
818
768
868
2638
7928
17
358
358
48776
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
9
Job Total
234.51
Tiae & Date
3:14:31 18/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
'Trmok: &
Custoier
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
81005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOSES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Custt 1
Job* 3089
Truck# VAD
Hilt 30
Kaae STATE BIRDER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9393
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
8:15:49
0
2910
820
700
780
2440
7650
9
356
356
8006
8:16:42
10
2750
810
770
840
2490
7660
16
346
346
16012
8:17:50
70
2930
790
780
810
2580
7890
17
353
353
24255
8:18:55
30
2850
790
770
820
2560
7790
15
352
352
32397
8:20:01
30
2820
800
750
830
2510
7710
15
349
349
40456
8:21:07
30
2790
780
760
810
2550
7690
17
349
349
48495
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
10
Job Total
258.76
Tiie & Date
J:22:00 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
3o
-------
) kul 7
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIKVILLE,HASS.
02762
CEMTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Hlxf
laae
Operator
Ticket#
1
3889
5 G
38
STATE BINDER
101 RAP
9394
Tiae
Aoq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2788
888
748
888
2528
352
8888
8:24:39
8
2798
828
748
888
2478
7628
9
362
362
7982
8:26:29
38
2868
888
738
848
2468
7698
16
348
348
16828
8:27:36
28
2788
848
778
AAA
on)
2538
7648
15
353
353
24813
8:28:42
38
2778
788
788
788
2518
7548
16
351
351
31984
8:29:48
38
2758
818
758
828
2528
7658
16
355
355
39989
8:38:54
48
2968
888
788
858
2498
7888
16
358
358
48139
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
11
Job Total
282.83
Tiae & Date
88:31:47 18/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
3 i
-------
8
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIKVIILE, HASS.
82762
CEMTIAL HASS. ASPHALT CO,
OLD COLDBRQOK RD.
BAIBE,RASS.
11005
588-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HORES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAR
Custt 1
Job* 3089
Truck# LC 542
Rix# 30
laie STATE BIIDER 101 UP
Operator
Ticket! 9395
Tiae
Am T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGO 3
AGG 2
AGG I
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2867
825
771
825
2599
363
8250
8:35:47
-10
2940
830
770
840
2590
7970
7
367
367
8337
8:36:32
40
2950
830
770
840
£80
7970
14
363
363
16670
8:37:38
30
2860
820
760
830
2650
7920
15
362
362
24952
8:38:45
20
2860
850
810
820
2650
7990
14
357
357
33299
8:39:51
30
2870
840
770
880
2630
7990
15
365
365
41654
8:40:57
50
2890
810
810
840
2600
7950
15
360
360
49964
8:42:03
40
2920
750
740
780
2560
7750
1
370
370
58084
8:47:32
40
Jm/x
870
810
850
2650
8200
14
363
363
66647
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
A
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total
12 316.15
Tiie I Date Fob/Del Location
08:48:25 li/05/98 F 2
M Dvr ~r% w-ty/ s;<*ur* 4
31-
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust* 1
Job# 3889
Truck* LC 752
Hix* 30
Haae STATE BINDER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9397
Ti«e
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp t asp a
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
9:04:52
0
2860
810
820
850
2570
7910
12
353
353
8263
9:05:35
0
2800
810
760
830
2500
7700
15
352
352
16315
9:07:12
30
2880
790
740
790
2540
7740
17
350
350
24405
9:08:18
40
2860
820
800
830
2560
7870
15
352
352
32627
9:09:24
0
2840
760
760
730
2460
7550
16
353
353
40530
9:10:29
20
2860
800
760
810
2530
7760
15
354
354
48644
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
14
Job Total
372.54
Tite & Date
09:11:23 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
33
-------
| o
Custoaer
LORUSSQ CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIMVILLE,EASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE,EASS.
01805
588-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cuat» 1
Job* 3089
Truck* LC 752
Hixt 30
Haae STATE BIIDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9398
Ti«
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Target
2780
AM
Ovv
748
800
2520
352
9:12:48
-10
2940
AAA
Ovv
750
810
2520
7820
10
356
356
9:13:35
20
2880
830
750
830
2540
7830
16
347
347
9:14:41
20
2700
790
750
830
2490
7560
15
349
349
9:15:47
38
2700
830
750
830
2480
7590
15
354
354
9:16:53
20
2860
780
700
840
2540
7720
15
351
351
9:17:59
40
2860
AM
Ovv
790
830
2490
7770
16
351
351
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Batch Total
8176
16353
24262
32206
40277
48398
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
15
Job Total
3%. 74
Ti»e & Date
09:18:52 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
3*f
-------
^ 1/
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
com OF HASS.
RTE 9
LEICESTER
Custf 1
Job* 2959
Truck# YOU
Hixf 16
Haae STATE DEKSE TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9399
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2524
4900
576
QAAA
OVQO
9:19:45
-10
2520
4950
7470
13
579
579
8049
9:20:16
40
2560
4950
7510
13
581
581
16140
9:21:45
30
2570
4950
7520
13
575
575
24235
9:22:51
20
2560
4890
7450
11
SAfl
JOv
580
32265
9:23:57
10
2460
4870
7330
12
577
577
40172
9:25:03
30
2510
4890
7400
11
578
578
48150
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Anunt Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
24.08
Tiae & Date
09:25:57 11/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
3S~
-------
"jTZxrctC 4. I
,T CO.
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, RASS.
02762
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE UOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Custf 1
Job! 3089
Truck* LC 757
«ix» 38
Kaae STATE BIIDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket*
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
OvW
9:26:46
-10
2830
780
760
780
2600
7750
15
349
349
8099
9:27:32
10
2840
790
760
820
2590
7800
15
345
345
16244
9:29:00
20
2860
780
740
800
2480
7660
15
352
352
24256
9:30:06
10
2870
790
720
750
2450
7580
16
356
356
32192
9:31:11
30
2880
780
730
750
2490
7630
15
350
350
40172
9:32:18
0
2820
780
760
810
2520
7690
15
351
351
48213
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
16
Job Total
420.85
Tiie & Date
09:33:11 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
30
-------
i3>
CO.
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINVILLE, HASS.
02762
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOWES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAM
Custl 1
Job# 3889
Truck! VAD
Hut 30
llaae STATE BUDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9401
Tiae A
aa T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
9:33:36
0
2790
840
730
830
2520
7710
16
351
351
8061
9:34:30
-10
2720
Ovv
760
850
2470
7600
15
349
349
16010
9:35:42
20
2890
840
790
790
2580
7890
15
356
356
24256
9:36:49
10
2820
840
780
820
2490
7750
15
347
347
32353
9:37:55
30
2820
760
690
800
2500
7570
15
357
357
40280
9:39:01
20
2830
810
730
850
2510
7730
15
348
348
48358
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Too Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
17
Job Total
445.03
Ti»e & Date
09:39:54 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
31-
-------
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OK FILE
|ev
-------
£
fRv/cfc: iC
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAINVILLE,NASS.
02762
CENTRAL NASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LDBR00K RD.
BARRE.NASS.
01805
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HONES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Nix#
Nate
Operator
Ticket#
1
3089
5 G
30
STATE BINDER 10* RAP
9403
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
9:42:48
0
2790
820
770
810
2540
7730
8
353
353
8083
9:43:34
20
2810
780
710
780
2490
7570
14
351
351
16004
9:45:48
30
2840
800
720
880
2510
7750
15
350
350
24104
9:46:55
20
2880
780
788
850
2570
7860
15
355
355
32319
9:48:01
10
2730
820
760
800
2510
7620
15
351
351
40290
9:49:07
20
2930
790
770
800
2530
7820
17
353
353
48463
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
18
Job Total
469.26
Tiae & Date
09:50:00 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
21
-------
V \
^ IC?
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE,HASS.
02762
CEHTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HOHES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cuatl 1
Jobl 3089
Truck# LC 542
Hixl 30
Rate STATE BlIDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9404
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2867
825
771
825
2599
363
8250
9:50:26
20
2910
790
810
840
2620
7970
15
363
363
8333
9:51:20
50
2930
790
700
800
2570
7790
14
359
359
16482
9:52:43
30
2960
810
760
850
2610
7990
15
365
365
24837
9:53:49
40
2870
810
790
830
2620
7920
16
366
366
33123
9:54:56
40
2930
890
810
830
2550
8010
15
363
363
414%
9:56:02
40
2830
870
750
820
2610
7880
16
361
361
49737
9:57:08
30
2990
870
790
810
2620
8080
16
361
361
58178
9:58:14
20
2880
760
730
800
2550
7720
15
367
367
66265
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
19
Job Total
502.39
Ti»e i Date
09:59:07 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
^0
-------
"71?v"c,k- ^
CB.JI
PHALT CO,
Customer
LQRUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PlAIiVILLE, BASS.
02762
BARRE, BASS.
01085
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HONES
CRAWFORD RD.
QAKHAH
Cuatf 1
Jobf 3089
Truck# IC 543
lit! 30
laae STATE BIIDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9405
Tiae
*99 T
AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1 Age
j Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Totai
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
Sew
9:59:57
0
2830
810
740
820
2530
7738
12
351
351
6081
10:00:44
30
2840
860
770
810
2560
7840
15
350
350
16271
10:02:04
20
2810
820
740
820
2530
7720
16
351
351
24342
10:03:10
30
2780
800
800
810
2500
7690
15
354
354
32386
10:04:17
20
2750
830
740
810
2530
7660
16
351
351
40397
10:05:22
40
2700
810
690
780
2450
7430
16
350
350
48177
10:06:29
0
2700
780
750
840
2520
7590
15
353
353
56120
10:07:35
30
2940
780
710
840
2590
7860
16
352
352
64332
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
20
Job Total
534.56
Tite I Date
10:08:28 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
*1
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE, KASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01085
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HONES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAil
Cust# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# LC 751
Six# 30
laae STATE BINDER 102 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9406
Ti«e
Agg T AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
dAOA
own
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
10:08:54
10
2830
820
800
838
2530
7810
16
359
359
8169
10:09:47
40
2790
790
760
820
2470
7630
16
348
348
16147
10:11:25
10
2900
790
710
730
2510
7640
17
356
356
24143
10:12:49
10
2820
770
730
810
2520
7650
16
351
351
32144
10:13:55
30
2820
820
790
810
2510
7750
16
351
351
40245
10:15:01
40
2780
830
750
820
2560
7740
16
349
349
48334
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
21
Job Total
558.73
Tiae & Date
10:15:54 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
4^
-------
¦"[RucU- -it-
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIYILLE,BASS.
02762
CEITRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
81005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# BLK
Bixt
Haae
Operator
TLckett
30
STATE BIKDER
OJQO
TWO
101 RAP
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
omv
10:23:44
0
2830
780
760
820
2580
7770
13
350
350
8120
10:24:28
10
2830
820
730
830
2580
7790
17
347
347
16257
10:25:55
0
2800
780
720
740
2480
7520
16
352
352
24129
10:27:01
30
2790
790
730
790
2470
7570
16
354
354
32053
10:28:07
20
2780
800
770
810
2460
7620
16
352
352
40025
10:29:13
40
2770
800
750
790
2490
7600
16
350
350
47975
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
23
Job Total
607.07
Tite I Date
10:30:07 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
Hi
-------
0
it 2-C>
CENTRAL IASS. ASPHALT
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BARRE.BASS.
81885
588-355-2952
CO.
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIYILLE,BASS.
02762
Job
BAT STATE ROUES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Custl 1
Jobf
Truck!
Kixl
Haw
Operator
Ticket#
3889
LC 757
38
STATE BIIDER
181 RAP
9489
Tiae
Agg T AGG 4
AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2788
888
748
888
2528
352
8880
10:38:25
18
2788
788
748
838
2688
7738
17
355
355
8885
UiM
38
M
m
m
m
M
m
1?
1
m
m
18:33:57
18
2988
788
758
798
2588
7728
17
357
357
32193
18:35:04
8
2818
818
768
818
2598
7788
17
351
351
48324
18:36:89
38
2858
828
770
818
2570
7820
17
352
352
484%
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Abouot Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadt
24
Job Total
631.32
Tiae I Date
18:37:03 10/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
4 if
-------
^ 7~ |
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CEHTRAL HASS. ASPHALT 01
OLD COLDBfiOOK RD.
BASSE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HOHES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Custl 1
Job# 3089
Truck# HAD
Hix# 30
iiaae STATE BINDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9412
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asd T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
10:44:02
10
2790
820
750
810
2460
7630
14
350
350
7980
10:45:06
0
2820
800
770
800
2510
7700
14
351
351
16031
10:46:12
30
2820
770
720
790
2450
7550
15
352
352
23933
10:47:19
40
2760
780
730
850
2530
7650
15
349
349
31932
10:48:25
10
2790
760
740
1020
2530
7840
15
355
355
40127
10:49:31
10
2780
750
790
910
2570
7800
16
355
355
48282
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
25
Job Total
655.46
Tiae & Date
10:50:24 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
4sr
-------
^.€TTUc riu^LO'V
<=h— (>o —
ict^j &H T>hw >jb/L >Vv
,T CO.
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIMVILLE, HASS.
02762
BARRE, if ASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Custt
Jobt
Truck#
BikI
laie
Operator
Ticket*
1
3869
5 G
30
STATE BIHDER 10X RAP
9413
Tiie
Aqg T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
10:54:55
0
2770
790
740
810
2490
7600
9
356
356
7956
10:55:42
40
2780
810
730
730
2650
7700
17
348
348
16004
10:56:49
10
2790
840
760
780
2520
7690
17
348
348
24042
10:57:55
40
2830
830
770
990
2540
7960
6
356
356
32358
11:00:59
50
2740
830
740
830
2780
7920
16
352
352
40630
11:04:44
70
2950
790
740
750
2530
7760
18
351
351
48741
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaouot Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadt
26
Job Total
679.83
Tit? & Date
11:05:36 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
fpxcU ^ % 3>
Custovr
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL RASS. ASPHALT 01
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,RASS.
81005
506-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAHFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
«u»
late
Operator
Ticket#
1
3969
LC 542
39
STATE BIIDER
101 RAP
9414
Tiae
*99 T
AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2867
825
771
825
2599
363
8250
11:07:35
40
2940
850
700
790
2650
7938
10
364
364
8294
11:08:24
60
2920
830
790
880
£40
7960
16
361
361
16615
11:09:31
50
2850
830
760
840
2570
7850
16
368
368
24833
11:10:36
60
2910
810
790
850
2670
8030
15
357
357
33220
11:11:43
60
2900
760
800
860
2550
7870
15
363
363
41453
11:12:49
60
2880
820
780
830
2630
7940
15
363
363
49756
11:14:14
30
2840
890
700
760
2540
7730
16
364
364
57850
11:15:18
70
3070
860
810
aia
(nv
2570
8150
16
365
365
66365
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
27
Job Total
713.01
Ti«e I Date
11:16:11 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
41-
-------
VK
\Zi,
-------
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAISVILLE, HASS.
02762
CEMTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBSOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01085
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOMES
CRAHFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Tiae
Target
11:34:15
11:35:04
11:36:23
*gg T
20
60
40
AGG 4 AGG
2760
2750
2820
2770
11;
11:39:41
Agg Tare
20 2920
Asp Tare
5 AGG
800
790
820
760
3
748
740
740
740
AGG 2
AGG 1
800 2520
800 2520
820 2550
830 2540
Cuatf 1
Job# 3089
Truck# IC 752
Hix# 30
Haae STATE BIKDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket#
Agg Total Asp T
7600
7750
7640
16
14
15
9417
ASP A
352
355
353
349
810
720
850 2510
m
7810 15 349
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Asp Total Batch Total
355
353
349
349
7955
16058
24047
m
48125
Load#
30
Job Total
793.54
Tiae & Date
11:40:% 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
So
-------
¦I
jfcvcL -A-
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCBER ST.
plaiivillmass.
82762
[PHALT CO.
BARRE.HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE WIRES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAK
Custf 1
Jobt 3089
Truck# LC 757
Hixt 30
Kaae STATE BIIDER 10X SAP
Operator
Ticket# 9418
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asd T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
OvW
11:41:06
30
2840
820
770
840
2500
7770
14
352
352
8122
11:41:54
40
2850
810
740
830
2510
7740
14
350
350
16212
11:43:11
50
2880
760
730
800
2540
7710
15
352
352
24274
11:44:18
20
2750
820
800
830
2530
7730
15
354
354
32358
11:45:24
50
2810
810
700
720
2510
7550
15
351
351
40259
11:46:29
40
2930
760
720
780
2520
7710
15
350
350
48319
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
31
Job Total
817.70
Tiae & Date
11:47:23 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BABRE,BASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Custoaer Job Custf
CHARGE SALE HUHICIPAL PAVIRG Job#
ACCT.OI PILE Truck# 4
Kix# 67
Haae SIDE VALK
Operator
Ticket# 9420
Tiae Agg T AGG 2 AGG 1 Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
Target 2088 4250 417 6667
11:55:19 30 2010 4320 6330 13 411 411 6741
11:55:56 70 2010 4230 6240 11 420 420 13401
11:57:06 70 2020 4310 6330 10 418 418 20149
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadf Job Total Tiie & Date Fob/Del Location
1 10.07 11:58:01 10/05/98 F 2
£2-
-------
-A
Customer
LGRUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE, BASS.
#2762
"Mff01
BAREE.HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HQHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAIt
Cust# 1
Job# 3889
Truck# HAD
(fix# 38
Ha» STATE BIIOEI 181 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9421
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2788
888
748
888
2528
352
QQ/Mk
O0Rr
11:58:23
48
2868
818
758
748
2468
7628
13
355
355
7975
11:59:21
78
2928
858
738
798
2478
7768
12
358
358
16885
12:88:28
48
2838
858
838
798
2558
7858
11
347
347
24282
12:01:34
48
2848
810
758
828
2548
7768
12
351
351
32393
12:02:39
78
2788
798
728
848
2588
7638
11
349
349
48372
12:83:45
58
2988
818
768
838
2548
7988
11
354
354
48626
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Anunt Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
32
Job Total
842.81
Tiie I Date
12:84:39 10/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
SI
-------
so
^ So
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE,HASS.
02762
CEMTBAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, SASS.
01805
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOMES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Hix#
Kaie
Operator
Ticket#
1
3089
5 G
30
STATE BINDER
101 RAP
9422
Tiae
Agg T AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
12:05:06
30
2810
770
790
810
2550
7730
13
354
354
8084
12:05:58
30
2860
780
690
800
2470
7600
10
352
352
16036
12:07:35
20
2840
810
740
860
2590
7840
10
349
349
24225
12:08:41
40
2800
810
760
840
2500
7710
10
352
352
32287
12:09:47
40
2810
800
760
810
2510
7690
11
351
351
40328
12:10:53
40
2890
800
760
800
2590
7840
12
353
353
48521
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
33
Job Total
866.27
Tiae & Date
12:11:46 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
°?v
"n2uck, 3 \
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBBOOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Hix#
iaae
Operator
Ticket#
1
3089
LC 542
30
STATE BINDER
10% RAP
9423
Tiae
Ado T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2867
825
771
825
2599
363
8250
8253
12:12:11
30
2810
840
810
850
2580
7890
12
363
363
12:13:05
20
2820
790
720
760
2530
7620
11
365
365
16238
12:14:26
50
2890
840
780
890
2530
7930
11
361
361
24529
12:15:33
40
2850
820
770
860
2580
7880
11
362
362
32771
12:16:39
60
2820
800
820
870
2640
7950
11
362
362
41083
12:17:45
20
2900
840
720
860
2690
8010
12
366
366
49459
12:18:52
30
2920
790
800
840
2560
7910
13
362
362
57731
12:19:58
20
2870
790
730
750
2580
7720
12
363
363
65814
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
34
Job Total
899.18
Tiae & Date
12:20:51 10/05798
Fob/Del Location
F 2
sr
-------
/
1c A
Customer
LOSUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE,H4SS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HONES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAM
Cust#
Job#
1
3063
Truck# LC 543
Six# 30
Hate STATE BIDDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9424
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total A
sp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
OvvV
12:21:25
20
2780
780
720
890
2630
7800
13
352
352
8152
12:22:22
40
2910
810
750
850
2520
7840
14
353
353
16345
12:23:41
30
2820
830
780
850
2450
7730
13
355
355
24430
12:24:47
10
2880
810
750
810
2540
7790
14
352
352
32572
12:25:53
50
2938
790
760
830
2S20
7830
14
352
352
40754
12:26:59
-10
2800
830
690
800
2500
7620
15
354
354
48728
12:28:05
20
2800
810
760
790
2450
7610
15
348
348
56686
12:29:11
50
2750
790
760
850
2540
7690
15
348
348
64724
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
35
Job Total
931.54
Tiae I Date
12:30:05 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
SL
-------
%
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
82762
CENTRAL USS. ASPHALT 0).
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE,KASS.
«iee5
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HONES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAN
Custf 1
Job* 3089
Truck# LC 75i
Hix# 30
Naae STATE BINDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9425
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
nflM
OvW
8185
12:30:30
20
2900
800
780
800
2550
7830
14
355
355
12:31:24
50
2840
830
750
840
2510
7770
15
354
354
16309
12:32:47
20
2830
800
770
840
2520
7760
14
351
351
24420
12:33:53
50
2740
780
670
830
2470
7490
15
348
348
32258
12:34:59
30
2700
790
710
810
2520
7530
15
351
351
40139
12:36:05
40
2930
800
780
840
2580
7930
16
354
354
48423
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
36
Job Total
955.75
Tite & Date
12:36:59 10/65/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
St
-------
¦JZrcL ik 3u|L
CEMTRAL 8ASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBKOOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Custoaer Job Custl 9999
CASH SALE DBIVEMAY MIX Job# 9999
CUST. OH FILE Truck# 2
Ti«
Aqq T AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Target
2250
4781
469
12:39:48
10 2270
4830
7100
10
471
471
12:40:19
50 2270
4770
7040
13
473
473
12:41:28
40 2190
4750
6940
12
472
472
12:42:34
40 2250
4770
7020
12
469
469
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Hix# 67
Kate SIDE UALK
Operator
Ticket# 9426
Batch Total
7500
7571
15084
224%
29985
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total Tiie & Date Fob/Del Location
1 14.99 12:43:29 10/05/98 F 2
-------
L,
TjZsscU 3^
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PL&IHVILLE,MASS.
02762
CEITRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BARRE.HASS.
01005
586-355-2952
Job
BAT STATE HOHES
CRAHFORD RD.
mm
Custf
Job*
Truck*
Hixt
Maae
Operator
Ticket*
1
3089
LC 757
30
STATE BIIDER
10X RAP
9427
Tiae
Aqg T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2788
888
748
888
2520
352
OQVO
12:43:59
40
2888
888
818
838
2540
7868
16
358
358
8210
12:44:48
58
2858
828
738
888
2530
7738
13
349
349
16289
12:46:84
58
2888
768
770
838
2520
7688
14
351
351
24328
12:47:11
38
2838
798
728
818
2460
7618
14
351
351
32281
12:48:16
28
2798
888
720
830
2530
7670
14
349
349
40300
12:49:22
58
2898
798
748
850
2528
7798
14
355
355
48445
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
37
Job Total
979.97
Tiae I Date
12:50:16 10/85/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
51
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0L0BR00K RD.
BARRL RASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAM
Custt 1
Job# 3089
Truck* WAD
Hixl 30
Haae STATE BIIDER 10t RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9428
Tiae
Aoq T AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1 1
tgg Total
Asd T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
8263
12:50:45
30
2840
920
780
830
2540
7910
16
353
353
12:52:23
20
2790
940
760
870
2440
7800
14
351
351
16414
12:53:29
40
2820
830
730
770
2510
7660
13
353
353
24427
12:54:35
40
3070
780
770
800
2560
7980
14
353
353
32760
12:55:41
40
2710
830
750
810
2520
7620
14
347
347
40727
12:56:47
40
2760
870
770
790
2580
7770
15
357
357
48854
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Deat Charge Total Cost
Load#
38
Job Total
1004.40
Tiae & Date
12:57:40 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
Ql?
-------
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARREL, HASS.
01M5
588-355-2952
Job
DRIVEWAY HIX
Custl
Job#
Truck#
Hit#
laae
9999
9999
3
2
1/2 BIKDER
Tiae
Target
52:93
52:38
53:44
54:50
55:56
Agg Tare
Agg T
60
20
50
50
AGG 3
2540
2550
2540
2530
2510
2550
Asp Tare
AGG 2 AGG 1
2700 2400
2700 2390
2690 2400
2730 2420
2640 2350
2730 2420
Operator
Ticket# 9429
Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
360 8000
7640 U 361 361 8001
7630 16 358 358 15989
7680 16 363 363 24032
7500 15 362 362 31894
7700 14 364 364 39958
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
19.98
Tiae & Date
13:56:50 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
<
-------
Datasheet
'L^ A\a Date: \° -o
3 c
-------
\
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
DRIVEVAY HIX
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Hix#
Naae
Operator
Ticket#
9999
9999
2
15
STATE TOP
(TYPE I)
Tiae
Target
6:24:24
6:24:56
Agg Tare
Agg T
40
AGG 3 AGG 2 AGG 1
1488 2680 3344
1460 2640 3390
1470 2650 3310
Asp Tare
Agg Total Asp T ASP A
488
7490 8 491
7430 13 487
9381
Asp Total
491
487
Batch To
7981
15898
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
7.95
Tiae & Date
06:26:01 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
t>3>
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIMVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Cust# 1
Job* 3889
Truck# LC 757
Hixt 30
Hate STATE BINDER 10! RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9382
Tin
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG 5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
CWW
8328
6:29:22
-10
2840
990
790
840
2510
7970
9
358
358
6:30:28
20
2800
1200
750
820
2590
8160
15
352
352
16840
6:31:34
30
2790
930
700
820
2470
7710
14
348
348
24898
6:32:41
40
2770
750
750
820
2490
7580
14
355
355
32833
6:33:47
10
2810
740
760
850
2520
7680
12
351
351
40864
6:34:53
40
2860
780
750
850
2600
7840
12
350
350
49054
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
24.53
Ti«e & Date
06:35:46 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CENTRAL NASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, KASS.
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
588-355-2952
Job
DRIVEWAY niX
Cust# 9999
Job* 9999
Truck* 2
Nix* 16
Kaae STATE DEISE TOP
Operator
Ticket* 9383
Tin
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2524
4900
576
8000
6:36:28
0
2530
4940
7470
9
565
565
8035
6:37:05
30
2550
4900
7450
6
586
586
16071
6:38:12
30
2470
4950
7420
5
582
582
24073
6:39:18
20
2510
4950
7460
5
574
574
32107
6:40:24
20
2540
4910
7450
5
577
577
40134
6:41:31
10
2540
5040
7580
4
577
577
48291
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Anunt Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
I
Job Total
24.15
Tin I Date
06:42:24 19/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, BASS.
02762
CEKTRAL I!ASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
586-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAM
Cust#
Job#
1
3089
Truck# WAD
Hi*# 30
la*e STATE BINDER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9384
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG I
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
OVw
6:48:31
0
2780
780
770
820
2470
7620
2
352
352
7972
6:49:16
20
2740
840
770
790
2480
7620
12
348
348
15940
6:50:23
20
2760
800
770
790
2480
7600
12
348
348
23888
6:51:29
30
2790
760
710
780
2480
7520
12
351
351
31759
6:52:35
10
2790
AAA
Ovv
740
730
2540
7600
13
357
357
39716
6:53:41
10
2740
810
760
810
2490
7610
12
350
350
47676
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
2
Job Total
48.37
Tiae & Date
06:54:34 10/05/96
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HA5S.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LDB800K RD.
BARiE, BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOBES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAlt
CU8t# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# S G
Bix# 30
laae STATE BINDER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9385
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
6:54:55
10
2800
800
770
810
2550
7730
13
351
351
8081
6:55:53
30
2810
AAA
on
760
860
2490
7720
12
350
350
16151
6:57:02
20
2840
780
780
860
2540
7800
13
350
350
24301
6:58:09
20
2740
810
730
810
2560
7650
13
352
352
32303
6:59:15
20
2720
780
710
820
2440
7470
13
354
354
40127
7:00:21
0
2770
840
730
830
2530
7700
13
351
351
48178
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
3
Job Total
72.46
Ti»e I Date
07:01:14 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
CENTRAL RASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, RASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOM OF ORANGE
KOLDSHIRE RD
Cust# 9999
Job# 3058
Truck! SG 22
Six# 18
Naae STATE BINDER
Operator
Ticket# 9386
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 4 AGG
3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asd T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
28M
900
900
JWI
400
nfXAA
OwO
7:02:53
-10
2850
930
890
3030
7700
6
407
407
8107
7:03:33
30
2860
880
920
3010
7670
12
405
405
16182
7:04:39
40
2780
920
930
3010
7640
12
401
401
24223
7:05:45
40
2780
QAA
jjFO
830
2940
7450
11
398
398
32071
7:06:51
20
2770
880
AAA
OOv
3010
7520
12
399
399
39990
7:07:58
40
2920
900
910
3050
7780
11
3%
3%
48166
19 Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
1
Job Total
24.08
Ti«e t. Date
07:08:52 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD CQLDB8Q0K RD.
BARBE, MASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOHES
CRAKFORD RD.
OAKHAH
Ti«e
Target
7:09:23
7:10:10
7:12:14
7:13:20
7:14:26
7:15:32
7:16:38
7:17:44
Agg Tare
Agg t
10
30
30
0
10
30
20
20
AGG 4 AGG
2867
2950
2940
2960
2850
2890
2930
2900
2920
Asp Tare
5
825
830
820
850
800
810
840
850
820
AGG 3 AGG 2 AGG 1
771 825 2599
810
780
790
700
790
790
780
750
890
840
840
820
870
830
2590
2600
2580
2550
2600
2640
2620
2630
Cust# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# LC 542
Hix# 30
Haae STATE BINDER 101 RAP
Operator
" 9387
ASP A
363
Ticket#
Agg Total Asp
7980
8020
7720
7920
7950
12
11
12
12
14
12
13
13
362
359
365
364
363
359
365
361
Asp Total
362
359
365
364
363
359
365
361
Batch Total
8250
8432
16771
25156
33240
41523
49962
58347
66658
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
4
Job Total
105.79
Tite & Date
07:18:37 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
*1
-------
Y
[4o
"O'H ^ TT—
Custoaer
LORlfSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, MASS.
02782
CENTRAL KASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
8ARRE,BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOMES
CRAVFORD RD.
OAKHAN
Cust# 1
Job# 3089
Truck# LC 343
Hix# 39
Kaae STATE BIIDER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 93%
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
8:55:44
0
2800
800
680
780
2500
7560
8
354
354
7914
8:56:28
10
2830
810
730
830
2530
7730
15
350
350
15994
8:57:35
20
2810
810
750
838
2530
7730
15
352
352
24076
8:58:41
10
2810
790
780
840
2520
7740
15
352
352
32168
8:59:47
10
2770
790
750
790
2520
7620
16
350
350
40138
9:00:54
40
2770
830
720
840
2480
7640
16
352
352
48130
9:02:00
10
2700
750
710
780
2560
7500
15
352
352
55982
9:03:06
30
2920
810
738
830
2520
7810
16
351
351
64143
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
13
Job Total
348.22
Tiae & Date
09:04:08 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
1-°
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLfiBROOK RD.
BARRE, BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
BAY STATE HOMES
CRAWFORD RD.
OAKHAN
Custf 1
Job#
Truck# LC 751
Six# 30
iaae STATE BINDER 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9407
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
748
800
2520
352
8000
8206
10:16:19
10
'2960
790
760
840
2500
7850
17
356
356
10:17:14
20
2800
820
760
820
2550
7750
16
350
350
16306
10:18:50
20
2850
820
710
720
2550
7650
17
351
351
24307
10:19:56
30
2800
AAA
on
760
830
2500
7690
17
349
349
32346
10:21:03
40
2880
780
770
780
2520
7730
18
355
355
40431
10:22:09
10
3010
810
740
820
2540
7920
18
354
354
48705
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
22
Job Total
583.08
Tiae I Date
10:23:02 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
?(
-------
y
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST- 08 FILE
CEITRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBSOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01805
588-355-2952
Job
DRIVEVAY BIX
Tiae
Target
10:37:35
10:38:20
Agg Tare
Agg T
10
40
AGG 2 AGG 1
2778 2835
2820 2850
2810 2930
Asp Tare
Agg Total
5670
5740
Asp T
15
14
ASP
Custt
Jobt
Truck#
Bit#
laae
9999
9999
3
33
3/8 TOP
A
387
389
386
Operator
Tickett
Asp Total
389
386
9410
Batch Total
own
6059
12185
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadt
1
Job Total
6.09
Tiae & Date
10:39:36 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
~9~1—
-------
Lof\D - r^T
CTOM¥T "¦
BARREL ASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Customer Job Cust# Sflflfi
CHARGE SALE HUilCIPAL PAVING Job# 8868
ACCT.OM FILE Truck# 4
Hixt 33
Maae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9411
Tiae Agg T AGG 2 AGG 1
Target 2778 2835
10:41:05 -10 2750 2780
10:41:32 30 2740 2820
10:42:52 50 2800 2850
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total Tiae & Date Fob/Del Location
1 8.95 10:43:47 10/05/98 F 2
Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
387
COQfl
5530
9
389
389
5919
5560
14
387
387
11868
5850
12
388
388
17904
?3>
-------
- v),D mT 1V^T
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCBEi ST.
PLAIWILLE,BASS.
82762
CENTRAL 8ASS. ASPHALT C&
OLD COLD8ROOK ID.
BA8RE, RASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
COW1 OF HISS.
8TE9
LEICESTER
Cust#
Job*
1
2959
Truck# BLK
lix*
Haae
Operator
Ticket#
16
STATE DEISE TOP
9419
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
% Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2524
4900
576
noofi
om
8025
11:48:32
10
2560
4890
7450
9
575
575
11:49:06
50
2570
4960
7530
12
580
580
16135
11:50:23
50
2540
4880
7420
11
578
578
24133
11:51:30
60
2S30
5170
7700
11
575
575
32408
11:52:36
30
2470
4830
7300
10
575
575
40283
11:53:41
70
2510
4860
7370
11
580
580
48233
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Coat/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
Job Total
46.20
Ti»e I Date
11:54:35 10/05/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
PES PROCESS LOG - ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA
Run No. 2 -
October 6, 1998
Data r
ecordet
j by Frz
jnk Pho
enix
START
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET
NO
MIX
TEMP. F
(10)
STACK TEMP.
F (11)
ASPHALT
TEMP. F
ASPHALT
LOADED AND
TESTED. LBS
ASPHALT LOADED
BUT NOT TESTED.
LBS
COMMENTS
6 29(16)
6 29
2948
LC 757
24
9430
7895
16
7 04
7 11
7777
1
24
9432
66058
7 14
7 20
2948
WAD
24
9433
387
351
315
48,114
7 21
7 27
2959
BLK
16
9434
400
360
350
48,233
1
7 28
7 34
2948
SG 22
24
9435
404
321
320
48,088
7 35
7 40
9999
3
8
9436
419
306
40,437
7 40
7 52
2948
LC 544
24
9437
413
286
66,095
2
7 53
8 02
2948
LC 542
24
9438
396
302
66.196
8 02
8 09
2948
LC 750
24
9439
399
302
48,131
8 10
8 15
9999
3
8
9440
402
316
40,226
8:16
0 26
2948
LC 543
24
9441
404
342
63,645
8 26
8 33
2948
LC 36
24
9442
64.257
8 37
8 43
2948
LC 752
24
9443
386
359
315/320
48.094
3. 4
8 44
8 47
8888
4
67
9444
411
337
20014
8 50
8 57
2948
RS
24
9445
65,832
9:00
9 06
2948
LC 751
24
9446
386
348
325
48.077
5
907
9 13
2948
LC 757
24
9447
391
370
320
47.960
9.16
9 24
2948
1
24
9448
66,158
9.26
9 34
2959
PER
16
9449
404
326
47.996
6. 7
9 35
9 40
9999
3
33
9450
449
255
34,130
8
940
9 46
2948
WAD
24
9451
410
214
330
48.081
948
9 54
SG 22
24
9452
411
265
47,919
9 55
10:03
2948
LC 541
24
9453
404
311
65,766
10 03
10:04
9999
3
8
9454
10,145
10:08
10.16
2948
LC 542
24
9455
416
302
332
65,858
9
10:17
10 22
2948
LC 750
24
9456
48.203
1024
10 26
8686
4
33
9457
18.034
1028
10 37
2948
LC 543
24
9458
385
277
330
66.064
10:38
10.46
2948
LC 36
24
9459
394
284
64.046
10 47
10 53
2948
LC 752
24
9460
390
307
47.914
12
11:04
1111
2948
RS
24
9461
412
297
66.173
11 12
1118
2948
LC 751
24
9462
393
297
320/325
48.020
13
11:19
11 25
2948
LC 757
24
9463
401
288
47.961
11 27
11 35
2948
WE 7
24
9464
391
284
66.033
14
11.35
11.39
8888
4
33
9465
392
279
30.446
11 40
11 46
2959
BRN
16
9466
383
283
350
47.925
11:46
11 51
2948
SG 22
24
9467
48.217
11.54
12 00
2948
WAD
24
9468
389
278
320/325
48.186
15
12 02
12.09
2948
LC 541
24
9469
393
273
65,967
17
12 15
12 17
9999
3
33
9470
403
309
2,169
12 38
12:45
2948
LC 750
24
9471
208
127
48,720
12 46
12 57
2948
LC 542
24
9472
376
260
63,726
12 58
13 07
2948
LC 543
24
9473
400
307
64,141
13 08
13.18
2948
LC 36
24
9474
410
320
320
63,838
13 19
13 26
2948
LC 752
24
9475
391
303
320
48 039
13 33
13 39
2948
LC 757
24
9476
48.480
13.58
9999
3
8
9477
14.109
14 11
9999
3
33
9478
8.026
14:51
9999
3
33
9479
22,264
15 19
9999
3
15
9481
49,034
Total
Total (lbs.)
1,832,428
536,712
Total (tons)
916 2
268.4
Comments
1 No RAP In Mix (Also Truck w/o Exhaust Stack)
2 Waiting On AFF • Slow Down In Tunnel
3 Port Change
4 Emissions Oft Body Of Truck
5 Missed Truck - Tunnel Not Secure
6 Dumped Dry Gravel Into Truck - Stopped Sampling, Shut Down Fan
7 Missed Part Of First Dump
8 Truck w/o Exhaust Stack
9 Missed First Part Of First Drop
10 Temp in Shoot That Feeds Hot Elevator
11 Stack Temp At Baghouse Inlet
12 Extended Test - Truck Left In Tunnel Beyond 15 Second Hold Time (10 53-11:02)
13 Missed First Part Of First Orop
14 Truck w/o Exhaust Cover
15 Port Change
16 Plant Start Up
17 Extended Test Start (12:09-12.14)
Procda~1.xls
-------
PES PROCESS LOG - ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA
Run No. 2 - October6, 1998 Bl W ^ ~P]
Data recorded by Frank Phoenix ' '
START
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET
NO.
MIX
TEMP. F
(10)
STACK TEMP, F
(11)
ASPHALT
TEMP, F
ASPHALT LOADED AND
TESTED.LBS
Asphalt By Mix
COMMENTS
7:35
7:40
9999
3
8
1
419
306
40,437
0:10
8:15
9999
3
8
2
402
316
40.226
80.663
721
7:27
2959
BLK
16
9434
400
360
350
48.233
1
9:28
9:34
2959
PER
16
9449
404
326
47.996
6. 7
11:40
11:46
2959
BRN
16
9466
383
283
350
47,925
144,154
7:14
7:20
2948
WAD
24
9433
387
351
315
48,114
728
7:34
2948
SG 22
24
9435
404
321
320
48,088
7:40
7:52
2948
LC 544
24
9436
413
286
66,095
2
7:53
8:02
2948
LC 542
24
9437
396
302
66,196
8:02
8:09
2948
LC 750
24
9438
399
302
48,131
8.16
8:26
2948
LC 543
24
9439
404
342
63.645
8:37
8:43
2948
LC 752
24
9443
386
359
315/320
48,094
3, 4
9:00
9:06
2948
LC 751
24
9446
386
348
325
40,077
5
9:07
9:13
2948
LC 757
24
9447
391
370
320
47,960
9:40
9:46
2948
WAD
24
9451
410
214
330
48,081
9:48
9:54
SG 22
24
9452
411
265
47,919
9:55
10:03
2948
LC 541
24
9453
404
311
65,766
10:06
10:16
2948
LC 542
24
9455
416
302
332
65.858
9
10:26
1037
2948
LC 543
24
9458
385
277
330
66,064
10:38
10:46
2948
LC 36
24
9459
394
284
64,046
10:47
10:53
2948
LC 752
24
9460
390
307
47,914
12
11:04
11:11
2948
RS
24
9461
412
297
66,173
11:12
1118
2948
LC 751
24
9462
393
297
320/325
48.020
13
11:19
11:25
2948
LC 757
24
9463
401
288
47.961
11:27
11:35
2948
WE 7
24
9464
391
284
66,033
14
11:54
12:00
2948
WAD
24
9468
389
278
320/325
48.106
15
12:02
1209
2948
LC 541
24
9469
393
273
65,967
17
12:38
12 45
2948
LC 750
24
9471
208
127
40,720
12.46
12:57
2948
LC 542
24
9472
376
260
63,726
12:58
13 07
2948
LC 543
24
9473
400
307
64.141
1308
13 18
2948
LC 36
24
9474
410
320
320
63,030
13:19
13:26
2948
LC 752
24
9475
391
303
320
48,039
1,520.852
9:35
9:40
9999
3
33
9450
449
255
34,130
8
11:35
11:39
8888
4
33
9465
392
279
30,446
12:15
12:17
9999
3
33
9470
403
309
2,169
66,745
8:44
8:47
8888
4
67
9444
411
557
20,014
20,014
Total
394.5
Total (lbs.)
1.832.428
1.032,420
Total (tons)
9162
9162
Comments
1
No RAP In Mi* (Also Truck w/o Exhaust Stack)
2
Waiting On AFF - Slow Down In Tunnel
3
Port Change
4
Emissions Off Body Of Truck
5
Missed Truck - Tunnel Not Secure
6
Dumped Dry Gravel Into Truck - Stopped Sampling. Shut Down Fan
7
Missed Part Of First Dump
8
Truck w/o Exhaust Stack
9
Missed First Part Of First Drop
10
Temp in Shoot That Feeds Hot Elevator
11
Stack Temp At Baghouse Inlet
12
Extended Test - Truck Left In Tunnel Beyond 15 Second Hold Time (10 53-11:02)
13
Missed First Part Of First Drop
14
Truck w/o Exhaust Cover
15
Port Change
16
Plant Start Up
17
Extended Test Start (12:09-12:14)
Procda~2.xls
1L
-------
(7a) TRv*ik_ ^(o CivCtt-. Datasheet
^ <© ©ptrs^-r^ A, 4:oc
(3) A** t» -- 4ft,<*>0 \>5. I"P2ArtUfig. fT gr^-T - U_ l|»f
Tr^-
C^T
©-
es* .
nU
©.
©
<$>¦
IE
It
l*
18
<1
i\
©->•2.7-
ZJ5
oD ^
1 ® *•
r z*
**
o
?
1
* *
3 ~
u 1
i
r
'a
*'S
e? i
I
1«
if
ftf 3
5 5 *
1 v» S
@ ©
11
Sol
3|
3V
33
3$
3i
AspM-cr pL/mr D
'Rp&pf- m4
^A| & 2-
P**r: /©
""©8t©t*
yfc/qg
P^ATak ?>4cCN'^
Tfe-r ^y.fvd^r ± * P (2) c£>
ZTFvzrrtO)
$TZ=P
-nau^K ^
=*t-
fAix: TemP
iHv^ temp
TctAc «P»6> 111
g •. e>-2-
g!
lcKo
2M- 1^/3^
311
S©2_
48 12.1
0: 10
6 - if
3
8 -
Sit.
4t> ii. (.
IL>
g
LC5H"?>
zi ¦ i«k 1
H'H
3^-2-
^4^
fc 1
S !vfs
Z4-TH^
36^
18o4«f ~
8: s«f
©: 41-
f
Vll
lo# »4-
^voo
?:ofe
LC
z-i - WHI*
3gfe>
^0
1.M3
UCI-T^
7-q~ W1~
3TI
Hl%o .
pos,
lb
Hof
3
WS>
»^1 ci: i<
3
- iMro
H41
ZSr^
?4l 3o
V. to
V.HSo
UAcO
z4 - ?nri
4(o
1'H-
%°&l *
1'. Hfc
\,S^
0.7_
7-v/ - ?<4rz—
^11
l£S~
41-4 il
n : ^
lo:o"%
LC
-7i< - tir?
4o4
an
t> ^ 1(o(o
10: og
if; 1^
LC £42-
24.
4tt
3f"2_
4f, SfS *•
|o: 2-8
10: 3^
LC rH3
¦z-4 -14
78 r
2.7-3-
6,(,. 6fr*f «
lo: 38
t» • %>
U 3t
M-
yw
LC fS"2-
2-i/- 1i/<.o
SHo
30^
niyi
(i ; e> 'f-
li' ll
4n-
M^h
|i '• iZ_
ll'. 16
LC- fri
a«{ -
313
•z-4 q-
l(g 0 2-C5
II U0!
ll: **
L^ -75^-
w{- 1^3
Ho |
z«S
(
11: '*-'1'
If. 3T
ylf f"
¦j-f -
3g3
2-g5
v> ?2-r
11: ^
/2-' 0 0
IWd
-«{- 1«(6f
3»1
•2-1-8
V8 i8^ ^
JZ - 0 2—
\n- \ 0'
Li Ml
*2-f 3
!*¦•' l£"
u-'.ti
3
- ^^0
3^
Z/(>1
1^-35
12-• ^
Lc ir8
n-?-
15-
LC S" MZ-
w/ - ^^"2-
?%
z&o
C2> 72-t
n-.gg
13
Lr^i(3
2-Y -H13
Hoc
I4|
IS; 08
13: 48
LC. 3 fc>
4io
37-C
638^6
rs-in
IZ:Z<*
LZL -?-53-
3o3
48 03.1
£n0 of^li
¦Sf
Asp^M"
Tc*p
°F
3'*V
3T.O
32-r
^Z-£>
3 So
©
/3-i U
^tf
3^0
Iz-ejizf
r^/ {try- ¦ • v -- r- ^ n*-^v » ¦ J ~ *- >i -»I r-p_*_y rg-ri r ~ ^ ^7 — — "• **v I - V-3/ ¦¦**-•'¦«¦» I
Barre Plant Data Sheets opp &»p^ s*£T> tr*^- (D Purvycro fcfcy
/«fb Jfevcic.- Srzfp<$> SA+fx^^ ^ £tWr- Po^M p-Afj (£) fA\t$(ct> ^M_T oF -piP^T" 0^)
(3) > fiobf of- fiZfr Oft^p <§>Tl*f )N S»wr ITMt" H»r EtfVAH^© T*5^ *f B^itouSf
-------
Custoaer
L0SUS9O COfiP.
3 BELCSB ST.
PLAI1»IUE,HASS.
02762
CEITfiAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOQK RD.
BASSE, USS.
01005
516-355-2952
Job
con. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / COITftACT
BTL 12 ASHBUBIHAI
Cust* 1
Job* 2948
* 9 Truck* VAD
Six* 24
laae NOTIFIED TOP 10X BAP
Operator
Ticket* 9433
T1k
Am T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
7:13:17
-20
2480
730
1360
2920
7490
9
387
387
7877
7:13:57
0
2450
920
1410
2920
7700
13
386
386
15963
7:15:13
20
2470
860
1430
2920
7680
14
382
382
24025
7:16:19
20
2510
850
1450
2900
7710
12
381
381
32116
7:17:15
10
2480
760
1430
2940
7610
13
382
382
40108
7:18:22
-10
2490
770
1410
2950
7620
11
386
386
48114
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Asount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
2
Job Total
4ft. M
Tiw & Date
07:19:14 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
01005
598-335-2952
Customer
Job
Cust* 1
LORUSSO CORP.
COM OF BASS.
Job* 2959
3 BELCHER ST.
RTE 9
Truck! BLK
PLAIIfILLE, BASS.
LEICESTER
flixf 16
92762
laae STATE DENSE TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9434
Tin Agg T AG6 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total Batch
Total
Target 2524 4900
576
AQAA
7:19:31 0 2S70 4900
7470
9 579
579
8049
7:20:33 20 2480 4910
7390
7 577
577
16016
7:21:44 0 2540 4890
7430
5 576
576
24022
7:22:51 -10 2550 4920
7470
7 577
577
32069
7:23:57 20 2520 4870
7390
8 578
578
40037
7:25:03 10 2550 5070
7620
6 576
576
48233
igg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total
Tiie A Date
Fob/Del Location
1 24.12
07:25:56 10706/98
F 2
H
-------
3
Custoaer
LORUSSQ CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
01005
500-355-2952
Job
COSH. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBURHHAH
# S
Cust#
Job*
Truck!
Hixt
Raie
Operator
Ticket!
1
2948
5G 22
24
MODIFIED TOP
let rap
9435
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total i
isp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
7:26:52
-10
2460
780
1440
2880
7560
8
385
385
7945
7:27:39
10
2450
790
1390
2910
7540
11
381
381
15866
7:28:45
0
2460
820
1430
2880
7590
10
382
382
23838
7:29:51
-10
2490
840
1420
2910
7660
9
382
382
31880
7:30:57
10
2480
830
1420
2930
7660
10
386
386
39926
7:32:04
20
2500
800
1430
3050
7780
10
382
382
48088
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
3
Job Total
72.04
Tite & Date
07:32:56 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
So
-------
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. 01 FILE
CEKTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COIDBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
DRIVEWAY HIX
Custt
Jobt
Truck#
Hut
laae
9999
9999
3
8
BIHDER HIX
Operator
Ticket#
9436
Tiae
Agg T AGG 4 AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2812
1140
1140
2508
400
7:33:31
0
3120
1100
1110
2500
7830
7
401
401
8231
7:34:20
20
2890
1140
1120
2500
7650
9
398
398
16279
7:35:33
10
2850
1150
1140
2510
7650
8
401
401
24330
7:36:39
20
2840
1180
1130
2510
7660
8
401
401
32391
7:37:45
10
2880
1120
1150
2500
7650
7
3%
3%
40437
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
20.22
Tiae & Date
07:38:38 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
§<
-------
// 4- o
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIRVILLE, HASS.
82762
CEXTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LD8800K RD.
BAR8E, BASS.
81885
588-355-2952
Job
COWL OF BASS.
DZST. 3 / COITRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURKRAH
Custl
Jobl
I
2948
Truck# LC 544
Biif 24
Haw MODIFIED TOP 18X RAP
Operator
TicketI 9437
Tiae A
M T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Tarnet
2553
825
1464
3811
3%
8249
7
39:51
-28
2568
858
1518
3818
7938
8
484
484
8334
7
48:37
28
2538
828
1438
3838
7818
7
391
391
16535
7
41:45
28
2548
848
1458
3848
7878
7
394
394
24799
7
42:52
18
2578
838
1488
TAJA
JV IV
7928
8
481
481
33128
7
46:42
28
2538
818
1418
2958
7788
9
392
392
41212
7
47:49
8
2548
828
1478
3838
7868
8
395
395
49467
7
48:55
8
2568
778
1498
3888
7828
9
397
397
57684
7
58:88
28
2568
968
1488
3818
8818
9
481
481
66895
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
4
Job Total
185.89
Tiae & Date
87:58:53 18/86/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
b
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PUIIVILLE, BASS.
02762
CEHTRAL HiSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDWOOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
•IMS
5*8-355-2952
Job
COM. OF MASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURRHAH
Cust# 1
Job* 2948
Truck# LC 542
Hixf 24
Raae KODIFIED TOP 102 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9438
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
8atch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
396
8249
7
51:33
-20
2620
890
1500
3010
8020
6
395
395
8415
7
52:19
0
2550
800
1460
3020
7830
9
397
397
16642
7
54:11
0
2510
810
1410
2990
7720
9
394
394
24756
7
55:17
10
2550
830
1440
3010
7830
9
394
394
32980
7
56:24
20
2530
780
1450
3020
7780
8
395
395
41155
7
57:29
20
2560
920
1480
3020
7980
8
402
402
49537
7
58:35
20
2570
AAA
OOv
1490
3020
7940
9
392
392
57869
7
59:42
0
2570
830
1510
3020
7930
10
397
397
661%
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Coet Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
5
Job Total
138.19
Tiae & Date
08:00:33 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
&3
-------
*
Customer
LORUSSOCOBP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIYILLE, BASS.
82762
CENTRAL IASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0L06800K RD.
BAKIE,HASS.
•1095
598-355-2952
Job
COWL OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / C08T8ACT
STL 12 ASHBUHHAK
Cust# 1
Job# 2948
# 9 Truck# LC 759
Hlx# 24
kaae UODIFIED TOP 1SX BAP
Operator
Ticket# 9439
Tin
Aog T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
899
1429
2929
384
8999
8:91:25
-29
2429
869
1359
2879
7599
6
384
384
7884
8:92:19
19
2479
819
1499
2929
7699
9
383
383
15867
8:93:32
29
2499
779
1469
2999
7629
9
384
384
23871
8:94:38
39
2519
879
1499
2949
7729
9
384
384
31975
8:95:45
29
2599
849
1459
2949
7739
9
382
382
49987
8:96:59
39
2599
819
1459
2999
7669
9
384
384
48131
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaouot Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
6
Job Total
162.26
Tiie I Date
98:07:43 19/96/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
8 4
-------
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. 08 FILE
CENTRAL NASS, ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BASSE, IfASS.
81005
508-355-2952
Job
DSIVEVAY HIX
Cust# 9999
Job# 9999
Truck! 3
Hixf 8
liaae BIHDER HIX
Operator
Ticket* 9440
Tiae
Agg T AGG 4 AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Target
2812
1140
1140
2508
400
8:08:15
0
2750
1150
1070
2490
7460
9
404
404
8:09:03
10
2810
1160
1130
2500
7600
7
403
403
8:11:19
20
2840
1180
1170
2500
7690
7
398
398
8:12:25
0
2830
1180
1170
2580
7760
6
400
400
8:13:31
10
2880
1130
1170
2530
7710
6
401
401
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Batch Total
IWW
7864
15867
23955
32115
40226
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
2
Job Total
40.33
Tiae & Date
08:14:24 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
8^
-------
1
Cuatoaer
L08US90 CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PUIIYIILMASS.
92762
CERTBAL MASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBWO* RD.
BARK.IASS.
•1N5
588-355-2952
Job
com. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / COITBACT I 9
BTL 12 ASHBUBIHAH
0\
Cust* 1
Job! 294S
Truck* LC 543
Hixf 24
few RODIFIED TOP 18X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9441
Ti«e 1
aa T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp t asp
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
866
1426
2928
384
8666
8:14:58
6
2426
776
1348
2866
7396
4
384
384
7774
8:15:43
26
2466
786
1428
2896
7556
6
382
382
15786
8:18:32
-16
2566
816
1458
2956
7718
7
383
383
23799
8:19:38
6
2526
746
1448
2956
7656
7
383
383
31832
8:26:44
6
2566
728
1438
2948
7598
7
383
383
39865
8:21:56
-16
2496
758
1368
2846
7446
7
383
383
47628
8:22:56
16
2436
786
1418
2918
7536
7
385
385
55543
8:24:62
6
2496
828
1456
2966
7728
6
382
382
63645
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Too Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
7
Job Total
194.6ft
Ti*e & Date
68:24:55 16/66/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Cugtoaer
L0RUS90 CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PUWILLE, BASS.
02762
CESTRAL IIASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LM800K 80.
BABBLIASS.
•IMS
508-355-2952
Job
COUL OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTS. 12 ASHBURMHAH
Custl 1
Job# 2946
I 9 Truck# LC 752
Six* 24
Nate MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
TicketI 9443
Tik
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8:35:57
-20
2430
830
1360
2930
7570
0
387
387
7957
8:36:40
20
2490
800
1410
2950
7650
7
383
383
15990
8:37:47
10
2j9V
800
1420
2900
7620
7
382
382
23992
8:38:53
20
2470
830
1440
2900
7640
7
381
381
32013
8:39:59
20
2480
800
1430
2950
7660
7
384
384
40057
8:41:05
20
2480
800
1430
2940
7650
7
387
387
48094
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
9
Job Total
259.26
Tiae i Date
88:41:57 10/06/96
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OM FILE
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBSOOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
HUIICIPAL PAVIKG
Cust# 8888
Job# 8888
Truck# 4
Hix# 67
laae SIDE VALK
Operator
Ticket# 9444
Tiae
*99 T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2000 4250
417
6667
8:42:36
-10
1950 4240
6190
4
415
415
6605
8:43:16
0
2010 4260
6270
3
421
421
13296
8:45:19
0
2030 4270
6300
4
418
418
20014
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
10.01
Ti«e & Date
08:46:13 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
8
-------
12-
Custoaer
LQBUSSD CORP.
3 BEUCBER ST.
PLAII?ILLE«HASS.
82762
CHT8AL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOWOOK RD.
BAKE, BASS.
91M5
548-355-2952
Job
COWL OF 8ASS.
DIST. 3 / C0KT8ACT
STE. 12 ASHBUBRHAH
Custf 1
Job! 2948
f 9 Truck! LC 751
Hlx# 24
laae HOOIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9446
Tlae
£
¦HI
U
8
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
8:59:09
0
2510
800
1410
2970
7690
2
388
388
8078
8:59:52
50
24M
830
1400
2920
7630
6
384
384
16092
9:01:14
40
2500
800
1420
2900
7620
6
384
384
24096
9:02:21
40
2500
800
1420
2950
7670
6
381
381
32147
9:03:27
40
2490
780
1390
2880
7540
6
387
387
40074
9:04:33
30
2460
790
1450
2920
7620
6
383
383
48077
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
11
Job Total
307.22
Tiie & Date
09:95:26 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
\
-------
Customer
LflRUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, MASS.
02762
CE1TRAL IASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLMMOX RD.
BARBE,BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
COOL OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / COHTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBURMAB
Ti«e
Target
9:06:04
9:06:48
9:08:03
9:09:10
9:10:16
9:11:22
Agg Tare
*99 T
20
40
40
10
40
40
# 9
AGG 3 AGG
2476
2500
2490
2490
2480
2450
2500
Asp Tare
820
810
830
780
770
790
AGG 2 AGG 1
1420 2920
1420 2910
1460 2920
1420 2930
1460 2930
1350 2860
1390 2900
Agg Total
7650
7680
7670
7650
7430
7580
Cu9t> 1
Job! 2948
Truck# LC 757
Hixf 24
laae MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9447
Asp T ASP A^ Asp Total
4
6
7
7
6
7
A
384
384
384
387
383
383
379
384
384
387
383
383
379
Batch Total
8000
8034
16098
24155
32188
40001
47960
Cost/Ton Percent Tbx Load Cost Atouot Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
12
Job Total
331.20
Tite & Date
09:12:14 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CEITRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOUNXK RD.
BAfiEE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Custoaer Job Custl 1
LORUSSO CORP. COHM OF HASS. Job* 2959
MMUIi* BUm JSP
late
Operato
Ticket! 9449
02762 law STATE DOISE TOP
Operator
Ti«e
Agg T AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2524
4900
576
8000
9:25:56
0
2560
4890
7456
4
577
577
8827
9:26:30
40
2510
4880
7390
7
577
577
15994
9:28:33
10
2530
4920
7450
8
580
588
24024
9:29:39
40
2540
4930
7470
6
576
576
32070
9:38:45
50
2540
4900
7440
7
576
576
40086
9:31:51
40
2470
4860
7330
7
580
580
479%
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total CoBt
Loadf Job Total Tiie & Date Fob/Del location
2 48.12 99:32:45 10/06/98 F 2
-------
ir
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD CQLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Cuatoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH PILE
Job
D8IVEVAY
HIX
Custf
Job#
Truck#
Hixf
Naae
Operator
Ticket!
9999
9999
3
33
3/8 TOP
9450
Tiae A
gg T AG6 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
3936
4016
548
8500
9:34:54
0
3950
4070
8020
3
545
545
8565
9:35:28
40
3980
4050
8030
6
550
550
17145
9:36:35
40
3930
4030
7960
6
545
545
25650
9:37:41
50
3960
3970
7930
6
550
550
34130
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
1
Job Total
17.87
Tiae & Date
09:38:34 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
\U?
Custowr
LORUSSO COfiP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, BASS.
82762
CE1TBAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLMfiOOK RD.
BARK, BASS.
•IMS
508-355-2952
Job
COMIL OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CORTBACT
BTE. 12 ASHBUMHAH
» 9
Tin
Target
9:39U0
9:39:34
9:41:38
9:42:44
9:43:50
9:44:56
Agg Tare
*99 T
AGG 3 AGG
2476
38 2468
58 2498
60 2448
48 2468
30 2508
50 2500
Asp Tare
5
800
850
750
850
830
840
618
AGG 2
1420
1380
1418
1410
1430
1448
1450
AGG 1
2920
2840
2930
2930
2930
2940
2910
Agg Total
7530
7580
7630
7650
7720
7678
Cu8tf
Job*
Truck#
Hlxf
Daw
Operator
Ticket#
Asp T ASP
1
2948
HAD
24
MODIFIED TOP
181 RAP
9451
A
384
386
388
388
386
382
387
Asp Total
386
380
388
386
382
387
Batch Total
8800
7916
15876
23886
31922
48024
48881
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Awunt Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
14
Job Total
388.32
Tiae I Date
09:45:49 18/86/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
IS
-------
!*>
Customer
L08USSO COfiP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, MASS.
02762
CEHTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OU) COLD6SOOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
01085
518-355-2952
Job
CORN. OF BASS.
OIST. 3 / CONTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBU8RHAH
Cust# 1
Job* 2948
Truck# LC 541
Six* 24
Ka«e HODIFIED TOP 1«X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9453
TiK i
M T AG6 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
625
1464
3011
3%
8249
9:53:27
10
2520
800
1460
3810
7730
7
402
402
8132
9:54:11
60
2540
810
1480
2990
7820
9
394
394
16346
9:55:59
40
2570
830
1490
3010
7900
10
393
393
24639
9:57:15
50
2S60
860
1490
3020
7930
10
393
393
32962
9:58:11
50
2510
840
1500
3030
7880
10
399
399
41241
9:59:17
50
2570
810
1390
2970
7740
10
393
393
49374
10:00:24
30
2520
790
1440
2990
7740
10
394
394
57508
10:01:30
60
2540
820
1460
3040
7860
10
398
398
65766
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tu Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
lb
Job Total
445.16
Tiae & Date
19:02:23 19/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
H
-------
Custoaer
LOBUSSO OOSP.
3 BEUC8EB ST.
PLAII?ILLE,BASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD G0LDB80OK RD.
BAtt£,IASS.
•1005
508-355-2952
Job
com. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBllilHAll
Ti«e Agg T AGG 3 AGG 5
Target 2553 825
10:07:05 10 2520 850
10:07:50 50 2540 810
10:00:56 40 2560 850
10:10:03 30 2540 840
10:11:09 20 2610 830
10:12:15 50 2570 830
10:13:21 60 2550 810
10:14:27 40 2510 790
Agg Tare Asp Tare
AGG 2 AGG 1 Agg Total
1464 3011
1410 3010 7790
1460 3010 7820
1490 3020 7920
1480 2990 7850
1460 3040 7940
1440 3020 7860
1430 3000 7790
1410 3610 7720
Cust# 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC 542
Hlxf 24
Haw MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9455
Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
3% 8249
2 3% 396 8186
9 395 395 16401
9 394 394 24715
9 398 398 32963
10 3% 396 41299
9 400 400 49559
9 394 394 57743
9 395 395 65858
Coat/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
17
Job Total
478.09
Tlae A Date
10:15:19 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
IT
-------
Customer
L0SUS90 C08P.
3 BELC8EB ST.
PLAIIVILLE,NASS.
02762
CENTRAL «ASS. ASPHALT CTi.
OLD COLMfiOOK RD.
BARfiE,HASS.
•IMS
508-355-2952
Job
com. or hass.
DIST. 3 / COITRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURRHAN
Custf 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC 542
Six# 24
Raw KODIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9458
Tiae
Aqg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
3%
8249
10:27:16
10
2580
790
1390
2960
7720
5
3%
3%
8116
10:28:00
50
2600
840
1450
3030
7920
8
394
394
16430
10:29:23
40
2580
790
1500
3020
7890
9
393
393
24713
10:30:29
60
2560
850
1460
3070
7940
10
400
400
33053
10:31:35
60
2560
840
1470
IMA
jvm
7870
9
394
394
41317
10:32:41
60
2580
850
1480
OOflA
JVOV
7990
9
394
394
49701
10:33:48
50
2480
840
1510
2970
7800
9
398
398
57899
10:34:54
50
2570
790
1400
3010
7770
9
395
395
66064
Agg Tare
Asp Tar?
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost A»ount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
19
Job Total
535.22
Tiae & Date
10:35:46 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
LOBUSSO CORP.
3 BELCIER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HISS.
82762
CEXTSAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDflfiOOK RD.
BAHMiSS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
OOffiL OF HASS.
OIST. 3 / COHTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURRHAH
Cust# 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC 36
His# 24
Rare MODIFIED TOP 10t RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9459
Tiae
Ago T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
880
1420
2920
384
10:36:17
50
2460
800
1420
2880
7560
10
384
384
7944
10:37:16
70
2500
810
1420
2940
7670
10
389
389
16003
10:38:36
50
2490
790
1410
2870
7560
10
379
379
23942
10:39:42
30
2510
780
1440
2960
7690
11
384
384
32016
10:40:48
60
2480
790
1460
2910
7640
10
386
386
40042
10:41:54
50
2450
840
1360
2920
7570
10
387
387
47999
10:43:00
60
2480
780
1410
2930
7600
9
385
385
55984
10:44:07
60
2440
780
1460
3000
7680
9
382
382
64046
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
20
Job Total
567.24
Tiw & Date
10:44:59 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
(^CJV
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIYILLE, MASS.
02762
CEMTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD OOLOBROOK RD.
BARRE.IUSS.
•1005
508-355-2952
Job
COM. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTE. 12 ASBBUSNHAlt
I 9
Custf
Job#
Truck#
nix#
Raae
Operator
Ticket#
1
2948
LC 752
24
IftffilFIED TOP
QAAA
7W
101 RAP
T1k
Agg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
oon
10:45:47
20
2500
79«
1420
2950
7660
7
387
387
8047
10:46:31
59
2520
830
1450
2850
7650
10
378
378
16075
10:47:37
40
2420
790
1360
2950
7520
10
382
382
23977
10:46:43
60
2510
800
1400
3000
7710
10
389
389
32076
10:49:49
40
2450
790
1420
2850
7510
10
384
384
39970
10:50:55
60
2490
790
1420
2860
7560
9
384
384
47914
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
21
Job Total
591.26
Ti«e & Date
10:51:47 18/86/38
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
1/
Customer
L08US90 CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PUIIHUMASS.
§2762
CEBTRAL HISS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOfiROOK RD.
BABRE,JASS.
•1805
508-355-2952
Job
OMH. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / corrwcT t 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURKHAH
Custl 1
Job# 2948
Truck# R S
llxt 24
laae BOOIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9461
Tin
Acra T AG6 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGR 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
396
8249
11:01:16
20
2640
780
1510
3050
7980
3
396
396
8376
11:02:39
60
2550
800
1420
OOQA
7760
12
394
394
16530
11:03:57
60
2550
830
1470
OAiA
JVW
7890
12
394
394
24814
11:05:04
60
2560
890
1490
2990
7930
12
399
399
33143
11:06:10
30
2580
850
1500
3010
7940
11
394
394
41477
11:07:16
60
2590
830
1460
3010
7890
11
397
397
49764
11:08:23
60
2560
810
1510
2970
7850
10
394
394
58008
11:09:28
60
2S00
810
1510
2950
7770
10
395
395
66173
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dent Charge Total Cost
Load!
22
Job Total
£24.29
Tiae i Date
11:10:29 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
1. <¦'
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBfiOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Customer
LQ8USS0 CMP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIITILLE, IASS.
02762
Job
COM.
DIST.
RTE.
OF HASS.
3 / CONTRACT t
12 ASHBURIHAH
Cust# 1
Job# 2946
Truck# LC 751
Itix# 24
Naae MODIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9462
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
11:10:43
40
2460
790
1430
2900
7580
10
389
389
7969
11:11:40
60
2490
820
1420
2930
7660
9
382
382
16011
11:12:52
40
2490
810
1460
2910
7670
10
385
385
24066
11:13:58
40
2460
810
1430
2930
7630
10
382
382
32078
11:15:04
56
2510
810
1400
2960
7680
10
389
389
40147
11:16:19
50
2430
800
1380
2880
7490
9
383
383
48020
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
23
Job Total
648.30
Tine & Date
11:17:02 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
I pa
-------
Custoaer
IORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, BASS.
62762
CENTRAL WSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBSOOK RD.
BARK, BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
COffii. OF MASS.
DIST. 3 / COKTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBURIHAH
CuBtt 1
Job# 2948
# 9 Truck! LC 757
Hixt 24
Haw KODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9463
Tiae A
gg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
11:17:56
38
2460
780
1450
2950
7640
7
386
386
8026
11:18:39
60
2470
790
1400
2900
7560
10
382
382
15968
11:19:46
40
2490
820
1420
2920
7650
10
385
385
24003
11:29:52
70
2460
AAA
ooo
1450
2910
7680
9
384
384
32067
11:21:56
50
2570
770
1360
2900
7600
9
384
384
40051
11:23:26
70
2420
750
1410
2950
7530
9
380
380
47% I
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
24
Job Total
672.28
Ti«? & Date
11:24:18 1.0/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
I'M
-------
7
Customer
L08USS0 CMP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBfiOOX RD.
BARK, 8 ASS.
•1085
508-355-2952
Job
con. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBUR8HAK
Cuat#
Job#
1
2946
Truck# VE 7
Hi*# 24
Raae HOOIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9464
Ti«e
Aqg T AG6 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
3%
8249
11:25:00
30
2530
sua
OW
1520
3060
7950
7
3%
396
8346
11:25:46
50
2560
810
1480
TOM
7850
9
393
393
16589
11:27:16
60
2540
820
1480
2980
?m
9
399
399
24808
11:26:22
60
2580
830
1460
3020
7890
9
3%
396
33094
11:29:29
60
2530
790
1430
3060
7810
9
397
397
41301
11:31:35
40
2550
800
1440
3070
7860
9
395
395
49556
11:31:42
60
2590
850
1480
2950
7870
9
400
400
57826
11:32:48
70
2519
810
1449
3050
78J.0
10
397
397
66033
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
25
Job Total
785.30
Tiae & Date
11:33:40 10/06/98
Fflb/Pel Location
F 2
[02~
-------
Customer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OH FILE
CENTRAL USS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
HUHICIPAL PAVING
Ti«e
Target
11:34:20
11:34:59
11:36:05
11:37:12
Agg Tare
AggT
50
60
70
AGG 2 AGG 1
3473 3544
3520 3600
3510 3760
3540 3510
3510 3560
Asp Tare
Cust#
Job#
Truclct 4
Six# 33
laae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket#
9465
Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
484
7501
7120
7 484
484
7604
7270
7 482
482
15356
7050
8 486
486
22892
7070
6 484
484
30446
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaouot Tas Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
2
Job Total
24.24
Tiae I Date
11:36:04 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
l*2>
-------
Custoaer
L08USS0 CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINVILLE, BASS.
02762
CfUTRAL BASS, ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLO68OOX RD.
BARK, BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
COM OF BASS.
RTE 9
LEICESTER
Cust#
Job#
Truck#
Bixt
laae
Operator
Ticket#
1
2959
BBR
16
STATE DERSE TOP
Tiae
Agg T AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Tof.al
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Target
2524
4900
576
11:39:11
40
2510
4680
7398
4
576
576
11:39:47
11:41:52
90
60
25S0
2550
It
7
6
5?)
$
11:41:59
60
2540
4880
7420
9
580
580
11:43:15
110
2470
4830
7300
8
577
577
11:44:11
100
2510
4850
7368
9
574
574
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Q1CC
/TOO
Batch Total
7966
m
32114
39991
47925
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Chaice Total Cost
Load#
3
Job Total
72. ea
Tite I Date
11:45:M 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
(of
-------
/-\
Cuetoaer
LORUSSQ CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL IASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD GOLDBROOK RD.
BASSE,BASS.
81085
586-355-2952
Job
COHI. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBURIHAH
Custl 1
Job# 2948
» 9 Truck* HAD
Kixi 24
lav tlOOIFIED TOP 18X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9468
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AG6
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
888
1428
2928
384
8888
7966
11:52:31
58
2488
888
1410
2898
7588
18
386
386
11:53:19
48
2428
788
1448
2998
7638
18
384
384
15988
11:55:22
58
2528
838
1438
2888
7668
18
379
379
24819
11:56:28
78
2528
778
1348
2848
7478
18
387
387
31876
11:57:34
78
2558
AAA
ow
1428
2988
7758
10
388
388
48814
11:58:41
78
2578
AAA
Ow
1458
2978
7798
11
382
382
48186
A.gg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
27
Job Total
753.51
Ti« & Date
11:59:33 18/86/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
/o
-------
Custoier
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIRVILLE, BASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LD8R00X RD.
BASSE, HASS.
•iees
518-355-2952
Job
com. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / COITBACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASdBURXHAH
Custl 1
Job* 2948
Truck* LC 541
(fix* 24
lue BOOIFIED TOP 181 RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9469
T1k
Aoq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
3%
8249
12:00:01
40
2560
820
1480
3060
7920
13
399
399
8319
12:00:55
40
2480
850
1450
3120
7900
11
395
395
16614
12:02:09
40
2640
820
1460
2930
7850
11
400
400
24864
12:03:16
70
2490
810
1500
2990
7790
11
393
393
33047
12:04:21
90
2520
800
1413
2990
7720
11
394
394
41161
12:05:28
90
2600
840
1450
2980
7870
10
397
397
49428
12:06:33
80
2560
860
1520
3030
7970
9
395
395
57793
12:07:40
60
2510
AAA
OW
1420
3010
7780
10
394
394
65967
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Coat/Ton Percent Tax Load Co3t Amunt 7ax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
28
Job Total
?86.48
Tiae & Date
12:08:46 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
' {do
-------
SI
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE, KASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
DRIVEWAY NIX
Custt
Jobt
Truck*
Hixt
Haae
Tiae
Target
12:15:24
Agg Tare
Agg T
40
AGG 2 AGG 1
926 945
940 1100
Asp Tare
Operator
Ticket#
9999
9999
3/8 TOP
Agg Total Asp T ASP A
129
2040 3 129
9470
Asp Total Batch Total
129
2000
2169
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
2
Job Total
18.15
Tin & Date
12:15:38 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
|
-------
..v 2-
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCKR ST.
PLAIHTILLE,MASS.
02762
CEHTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OU) COLD8ROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01095
508-355-2952
Job
COM. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBURNHAH
Cust# 1
Job# 2948
# 9 Truck! LC 750
Hix» 24
laic KOOIFIED TOP 10! RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9471
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
247S
800
1420
2920
384
8000
12:37:48
30
2610
800
1450
3030
7890
6
390
390
8280
12:38:40
70
2560
790
1440
2960
7750
14
378
378
16408
12:39:46
90
2480
800
1390
2910
7580
13
383
383
24371
12:40:52
80
2480
790
1410
2910
7590
13
384
384
32345
12:41:58
70
2480
790
1400
2950
7629
13
384
384
40349
12:43:05
70
2680
790
1460
3060
7990
14
381
381
48720
Agg Tare
A9p Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Mount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
29
Job Total
810.84
Tiae & Date
12:43:57 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
¦tdfB
-------
3?
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE,BASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS, ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RO.
BARRE,HASS.
01M5
588-355-2952
Job
COHH. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / COKTRACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURIHAH
Custt 1
Job# 2948 ,
Truck# LC 543- £41-
Hix# 24
laae MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9472
Tiae
Agq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
888
1428
2928
384
n/iAti
oovo
12:46:43
38
2488
888
1398
2938
7688
8
384
384
7984
12:47:34
68
2468
798
1438
2918
7598
13
383
383
15957
12:48:42
78
2498
788
1418
2868
7548
12
381
381
23878
12:49:46
78
2428
888
1448
2898
7550
12
384
384
31812
12:58:52
58
2548
878
1428
2898
7720
11
382
382
39914
12:51:58
78
2478
768
1378
2878
7470
11
385
385
47769
12:53:18
48
2418
798
1418
2988
7510
11
383
383
55662
12:54:16
58
2558
788
1428
2938
7680
10
384
384
63726
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
38
Job Total
842.70
Tiae I Date
12:55:89 18/86/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
{0*1
-------
Customer
LOSUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, BASS.
•2762
CEITRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD GOLM800K RD.
BAKRE.USS.
81885
588-355-2952
Job
com. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / COBTRACT
RTE. 12 ASHBUBIHAB
Custf 1
Job* 2948
» 9 Truck* LC 543
flit* 24
laae MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9473
Tin
Agg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Target
2476
888
1428
2928
384
12:57:36
38
2468
798
1448
2928
7618
5
384
384
12:58:18
58
2528
798
1448
2958
7788
11
383
383
12:59:25
78
2538
888
1368
2898
7588
18
383
383
1:88:32
68
2538
778
1468
2918
7678
18
384
384
{;«;«
51
m
m
m
m
m
!
m
m
1:83:58
58
2478
728
1468
2928
7578
18
386
386
1:84:56
78
2448
788
1428
2938
7570
9
385
385
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Batch Total
7994
16877
24048
32894
56186
*4141
Coet/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
31
Job Total
874.77
Tiae & Date
13:85:48 18/86/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
i tq
-------
3T
Customer
LOSUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CEMTRAL IASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBfiOOK RD.
BABtE,HASS.
•IMS
508-355-2952
Job
COWL OF HASS,
DIST. 3 / CORTUCT #
BTE. 12 ASBBUMHAM
Custf 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC %
Hix# 24
law MODIFIED TOP 181 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9474
Tin
Ago T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
8000
1:06:27
40
2460
790
1390
2890
7530
4
.385
385
7915
1:09:10
60
2490
810
1420
2930
7650
10
381
381
15946
1:10:17
60
2470
780
1420
2920
7590
10
380
380
23916
1:11:23
70
2510
790
1450
2910
7660
9
394
394
31970
1:12:30
60
2500
820
1410
2920
7650
10
387
387
40007
1:13:35
70
2480
780
1360
2880
7500
10
387
387
47894
1:14:42
70
2420
790
1400
2930
7540
10
388
388
55822
1:15:48
70
2450
820
1450
2910
7630
10
386
386
63838
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
32
Job Total
9ft. 69
Tiae I Date
13:16:49 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
Iff'
-------
T
2,
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCIE8 ST.
PLAIIfILLE,BASS.
92762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLMROOK RD.
BASIC, BASS.
•1085
516-355-2952
Job
con. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / COITSACT f
RTE. 12 ASHBURttAN
Cust# 1
Job* 2948
Truck! LC 752
Hixf 24
laae HOOIFIE1) TOP 10X
Operator
Ticket# 9475
RAP
Tin
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total i
lsp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
890
1420
2929
384
8999
1:18:45
30
2519
800
1440
2959
7700
5
386
386
8686
1:19:31
69
2519
810
1420
2990
7739
11
380
388
161%
1:21:37
51
2479
780
1380
2850
7480
10
381
361
24957
1:21:42
56
2479
770
1430
2899
7560
11
383
383
32009
1:22:48
80
2490
830
1430
2940
7690
U
383
383
40973
1:23:55
70
2469
800
1420
2990
7580
10
386
386
48839
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Deat Charge Total Cost
Load*
33
Job Total
934.71
Tiae A Date
13:24:47 18/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
i IH-
-------
Datasheet
>
A
B
C
0
<1
A
r> r
10
<£CaAjO
TEVT
^pi+fvcr T>
rtvAr Date:
-tt 2_ JP^c^ MoT Sfr>-pie&
T^
Ti^k»rr *<¦
CU>6t
gAtt-H T»T»«-
T*1
?:ii:2«f
» I
1:12-
01^t: ?
S"i—
L<^ Sib
"M
6:4+
fc'.So: o>
1; 5"?". i-'V
PS
*- +
wr
a-.VB
2: ^
k: : 3°i
3
B
le> J e>£~
fo.' '*r
jo" '• |1-
iw.
LC ¦?*£>
M
VC
ID '.i-3
Ve, ^3
'. Vo
|eM-S"\ S(
4-
Wsl-
(CJ '. *-fe
l«, 03 v/
li.'^r: ir
ti : <; I'. ot
i*-
/(.' f -2—
n :!¦)•.
LC 3S-*-
"Z L
?L K>
in y&o
Pj
(* ¦ y°\
J
L <- 7 f 7
> !t-
1 > 7 ^
IH. S 1
^ i 7i
v
IS-, ft 11
"S
~ r
1'i <; i
^'1 0 3Li
Barre Plant Data Sheets
lt3>
-------
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COL08ROOK Kit.
RARRE, If ASS.
010*5
Custoaer
LORUSSO COfiP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PIAI»YUIE,HASS.
92762
Job
LOBUSSU CORP.
VARIOUS CONTRACTS
Ctratf
Job*
Truck#
Klx#
Ha*;
Operator
Ticket#
I
TP7
1
24
MODIFIED TOP
10X RAP
9432
Tlae
Agg T
AGG 3 AGG 5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Agp T ASP
A
Asp Total
6*tch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
3%
8249
7:84:13
-2®
2570
840
1510
3070
7990
6
431
401
8391
7:04:57
-10
2569
850
1470
3060
7940
13
391
391
16722
7:16:13
29
2571
830
1450
3020
7870
14
398
398
24990
7:07j»
10
2520
800
1400
2980
7700
14
3%
3%
33086
7:06:15
19
2540
788
1518
33%
7920
14
398
m
41404
7:19:22
-10
2530
760
1470
2050
7710
13
395
m
4950")
7:11:28
20
2560
870
1520
3000
7950
13
395
395
57854
7:11:34
-20
2590
800
1430
2990
7810
13
394
m
66058
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cast/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charae Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
33.»3
Tl«p & Date
07:12:25 1W%M
Fob/Del Location
F 2
l'4
-------
Customer
LORUSSO Q]SP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE,HASS.
12762
CEHTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLO BROOK RD.
BARBE.HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
COffl. OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT #
RTE. 12 ASHBURHRAH
Coat* 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC 36
list 24
laae MODIFIED TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9442
Tiae
Ago T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2476
880
1420
2928
384
8808
8:25:35
-38
2460
738
1410
2918
7518
3
385
385
78%
8:26:21
-18
2580
948
1460
2958
7858
6
385
385
16138
8:28:22
-20
2498
788
1438
2928
7628
7
385
385
24135
8:29:27
0
2428
768
1378
2928
7478
7
386
386
31991
8:38:33
0
2488
858
1418
2988
7640
7
385
385
48816
8:31:39
10
2488
818
1428
2898
7608
7
383
383
47999
8:32:46
28
2488
928
1468
2948
7880
6
383
383
56182
8:33:52
-10
2518
840
1438
2910
7690
7
385
385
64257
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atouni Tax Best Charge Total Cost
Load#
Job Total
226.21
Tiae & Date
08:34:44 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
Ty l 4 fx 3
It? Irr
P'VS pct
pr
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAII?ILLE,HASS.
82762
CDrrSAL IASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD OOLO88OOC RD.
BAME.BASS.
•1005
506-355-2952
Job
COWL OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / COHTMCT » 9
RTE. 12 ASHBUMHAH
Cust# 1
Job* 2946
Truck# R S
Hix# 24
law BODIPIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9445
Tin
Agg T AG6 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3011
3%
8249
8:50:03
0
2530
810
1450
2970
7760
-1
400
400
8160
8:50:47
40
2580
820
1450
2990
7840
6
391
391
16391
8:51:54
0
2540
840
1490
3010
7880
5
395
395
24666
8:53:00
40
2560
830
1470
3030
7890
6
393
393
32949
8:54:07
10
2550
750
1480
3030
7810
6
397
397
41156
8:55:12
40
2560
820
1510
3030
7920
6
395
395
49471
8:56:19
10
2510
830
1390
2950
7680
8
393
393
57544
8:57:24
50
2560
AAA
Otv
1480
3010
7890
7
398
398
65832
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost. Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
10
Job Total
283.18
Tiae A Date
08:58:17 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
/ v I 4 t y ^
T c
f 'V' .i>IL ^ P"j
— pir
l. i2_
,\|t?
-------
CEITRAL BASS.
OLD COUH800I
BARE,SASS.
•IMS
588-355-2952
asphalt ca
Customer
LOSUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHILLMASS.
•2762
Job
COOL OF BASS.
DIST. 3 / COBTtACT # 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURIHAH
Cuatf
Job*
Truck!
His*
law
Operator
Ticket!
1
2948
1
24
MODIFIED TOP 101 BAP
9448
TLk A
99 T
AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2553
825
1464
3811
396
8249
9:16:34
8
2558
838
1528
OOQA
7998
3
482
482
8392
9:17:19
48
2528
758
1588
2998
7768
18
395
395
16547
9:18:25
28
25S8
888
1498
naoa
7848
18
394
394
24781
9:19:31
48
2568
888
1468
3838
7858
11
395
395
33826
9:28:37
38
2578
848
1588
3858
7968
18
394
394
41388
9:21:43
18
2588
788
1588
3878
7938
18
394
394
49784
9:22:49
38
2568
848
1498
2988
7878
11
488
488
57974
9:23:55
48
2578
fllfl
OW
1488
2988
7798
11
394
394
66158
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
13
Job Total
364.28
Tiae A Date
89:24:47 18/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-t
I >
I <
II3-
-------
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBBOOK RD.
BASSE, 8ASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Custoaer Job Cust# 999S
CASH SALE DRIVEWAY HIX Job* 9999
CUST. ON FILE Truck# 3
Six# 8
Kate BINDER HIX
Operator
Ticket# 9454
Tiae Agg T AGG 4 AGG 3 AGG 2 AGG I Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
Target 1758 713 713 1568 250 5002
10:02:47 30 1750 760 740 1580 4830 12 252 252 5082
10:03:39 50 1750 730 740 1590 4810 8 253 253 10145
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total Tiae & Date Fob/Del Location
3 45.40 10:05:03 10/06/98 F 2
US
-------
-------
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Custowr Job Cust# 8888
CHARGE SALE HUHICIPAL PAVING Job# 8888
ACCT.ON FILE Truck# 4
Mix* 33
Hue 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9457
Tin Ago T AGG 2 AGG 1 Agg
Target 2778 2835
10:23:50 30 2780 2820
10:24:28 60 2820 2850
10:25:41 60 2790 2810
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total Tiae & Date Fob/Del Location
1 9.02 10:26:35 10/06/98 F 2
Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
387
rixim
oooo
5600
7
389
389
5989
5670
7
387
387
12046
uuw
7
388
388
18034
IZO
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE,HASS.
82762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLD8ROOK RD.
BARRE.IASS.
•INS
586-355-2952
Job
com. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT
RTE. 12 ASRBURIHAH
Custl 1
Job! 2948
I 9 Truck* 5G 22
Six# 24
Kate MODIFIED TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9467
Tite A
-------
CENTRAL BASS. _
OLD COLMSOOK
BABKMASS-
01005
508-355-2952
T CO.
Custoaer
L08USS0 CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAII?ILLE, MASS.
•2762
Job
CORE. OF KASS.
OIST. 3 / COMTBACT
BUI. 12 ASHBURKHAH
Cust# 1
Jobl 2948
I 9 Truck# LC 757
Bix# 24
Naae ROOIFIED TOP 18X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9476
Tim
Agg T AGG 3 AOG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
8000
Target
2476
800
1420
2920
384
1:33:17
38
2460
790
1460
2970
7680
5
388
388
8068
1:34:11
69
2500
780
1390
2900
7570
11
382
382
16020
1:35:17
80
2440
720
1410
2940
7510
10
382
382
23912
1:36:13
96
2460
900
1410
2920
7690
i«
384
384
31986
1:37:19
90
2480
820
1430
3170
7900
10
384
Tfti
•JOH
40270
1:38:26
50
2420
880
1440
3090
7830
10
380
380
48488
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
34
Job Total
964-85-
Tiw & Date Fob/Del Location
13:39:18 10/86/98 F 2
t%7-
-------
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, NASS.
02762
CENTRAL IUSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE, BASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
COHH. OF HASS.
DIST. 3 / CONTRACT I 9
RTE. 12 ASHBURRHAH
Tiae Agg T AGG 3 AGG 5
Target 2476 800
6:29:06 0 2480 720
Agg Tare Asp Tare
AGG 2 AGG 1
1420 2920
1410 2900
Custt 1
Job# 2948
Truck# LC 757
Hixf 24
Haae MODIFIED TOP 10% RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9430
Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total
384
7510 7 385 385
Batch Total
7895
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
Job Total
Ti* & Date
06:33:26 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
l^2>
-------
CENTRAL MSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARSE, HASS.
81005
508-355-2952
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
Tiae Agg T
Target
1:58:05 50
1:58:55 100
Job
DRIVEWAY
HIX
Agg Tare
AGG 4 AGG 3
2461 998
2570 1030
2470 1020
Asp Tare
AGG 2
998
1020
990
AGG 1
2195
2130
2170
Cust#
Job*
Truck#
Hix#
Kate
9999
9999
3
8
BINDER HIX
Operator
Ticket#
9477
Agg Total Asp T ASP A
350
6750 9 356
6650 15 353
Asp Total
356
353
Batch Total
7002
7106
14109
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
4
Job Total
52.45
Tiae & Date
13:59:50 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
I->-4
-------
CO.
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. 01 FILE
BARBE, RASS.
01005
568-355-2952
Job
DRIVEVAY MIX
Tiae Ago T AGG 2 AGG 1
Target 3704 3780
2:11:04 60 3710 3800
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Agg Total Asp T ASP A
516
7510 12 516
Cust# 9999
Job# 9999
Truck# 3
Nix# 33
Haae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9478
Asp Total Batch Total
516
8028
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
3
Job Total
22.16
Tiae I Date
14:11:25 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
, BASS.
81005
588-355-2952
Custoaer Job Custf 9999
CASH SALE DRIVEWAY HIX Job! 9999
CUST. 01 FILE Truck# 3
Hixf 33
Haae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9479
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
3395 3465
473
7333
2:39:34
110
3380 3460
6840
14
471
471
7311
2:40:13
120
3400 3560
6960
20
471
471
14742
2:51:29
140
3440 3610
7050
16
472
472
22264
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadt Job Total Tiie & Date Fob/Del Location
4 33.29 14:52:22 10/06/98 F 2
11~
-------
T
CENTRAL
CO.
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH
BARRE,SASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
DRIVEVAY HIX
FILE
Tiae
Ago T AGG 3 AGG 2
AGG 1
Target
1519
2736
3414
3:18:55
70
1520
2780
3420
3:19:31
80
1530
2770
3450
3:20:38
100
1470
2690
3370
3:21:44
110
1500
2740
3440
3:22:50
90
1530
2720
3400
3:23:56
110
1510
2750
3450
ig Tare
Asp Tare
Cust# 9999
Job# 9999
Truck# 3
liix# 15
Haw STATE TOP (TYPE I)
Operator
Ticket# 9481
Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
498 8167
7720 7 500 500 8220
7750 12 503 503 16473
7530 10 499 499 24502
7680 10 499 499 32681
7650 11 4% 4% 40827
7710 10 497 497 49034
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Atount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
24.52
Tiae & Date
15:24:49 10/06/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
PES PROCESS LOG - ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA
Run No
. 3 - October 7, 1998
Data recorded b
y Frank
Phoenix
START
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET NO
MIX TEMP,
F
STACK
TEMP. F
ASPHALT
TEMP, F
ASPHALT
LOADED
AND
TESTED,
LBS
ASPHALT LOADED
BUT NOT TESTED.
LBS
COMMENTS
6:26
6 32
3057
LC 757
30
9482
48.137
636
6 43
2959
BLK
'6
9483
398
228
350
48,569
6 44
6.51
3057
WAD
30
9484
391
233
315
48,358
6:52
7 00
3057
WE 7
25
9485
411
255
315
66,121
1
7 01
7 09
3057
LC 544
25
9486
408
241
66.131
7:11
7 20
3057
COMO
25
9487
405
258
66.248
2
7 21
7 27
3057
SG 22
25
9488
407
331
48,289
3
7 38
7.46
3057
LC 36
25
9489
425
292
64,090
748
7 56
2948
LC 543
25
9490
387
290
325
63,819
7:58
8 05
3057
LC 754
25
9491
48,486
8:07
8 10
8888
4
60
9492
441
266
17,966
4
8 11
8 19
3057
RS
25
9493
414
299
340
65,939
8:21
8:29
3057
MAC
25
9494
421
280
340
65,934
8:30
8:36
3057
LC 753
25
9495
403
312
48,078
8 38
8 44
3057
LC 757
25
9496
406
304
330
48.082
8:45
8 52
2959
VOU
16
9497
401
321
47,966
6
8:52
8 55
8888
4
33
9498
396
318
20,123
856
B 59
8888
4
33
9499
396
319
20.005
5
910
9 16
3057
WAD
25
9500
253
129
48,237
9.53
10 07
3057
WE 7
25
9501
147
88
320
65,744
7. 8. 12
10 13
10.24
3057
LC 544
25
9502
267
136
66,394
10 28
10 38
3057
COMO
25
9503
419
290
310
66.071
9
10 39
10 45
3057
SG 22
25
9504
408
280
48,222
10. 11
10 59
11 09
3057
LC 36
25
9505
187
127
316
64,072
11 10
11:20
3057
LC 543
25
9506
424
263
64,275
11 21
11 27
3057
LC 754
25
9507
401
299
47,935
11 27
11.28
8888
4
60
9508
12,021
13
11 31
11 40
3057
RS
25
9509
409
299
320
66,241
14
11 40
11 42
8888
4
33
9510
20,160
11 45
11 50
9999
3
18
9511
357
368
30.211
15. 16
11 55
1201
3057
LC 753
25
9512
383
321
48.168
17
1206
12 15
3057
MAC
25
9513
305
66,025
12 23
1231
8888
4
33
9514
359
311
11,947
12 32
12 40
3057
LC 757
25
9515
401
349
48.124
12 43
12 52
2959
BLK
16
9516
394
350
47.996
1253
12 56
8888
4
33
9517
381
340
20.069
13 00
13 08
3057
WE 7
25
9518
420
296
65.886
18
1309
13 13
9899
3
2
9519
410
301
345
32.121
19
Total
Total (lbs.)
1.713,456
128,804
Total (tons)
856 7
64 4
Comments (Exhaust refers to truck engine exhaust)
1
Can't Cover Truck Exhaust
2
Exhaust Stacks Too High - Exhaust Into TTE
3
Extended Test 7 27-7 36, Exhaust Not Completely Sealed
4
Port Change
5
Extended Test 8 59-9:09 (2 5 ppm).
6
Ticket Taken By Driver
7
Waiting On Trucks
8
Truck w/o Exhaust
9
Truck w/o Exhaust
10
Missed First Part of First Dump
11
Extend Test 10 45-10 56 (1 9 ppm)
12
Mix Temp Low When The Elevator is Empty
13
Dryer Shut Down
14
Did Not Sample Truck (C)
15
Port Change
16
No Cover On Exhaust
17
Tunnel Slow To Secure
18
Can't Cover Exhaust
19
Extended Test 13:13-13 23 (2 4 ppm) {Truck w/o RAP)
Procda~1.xls
-------
PES PROCESS LOG - ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA
Run No. 3 - October 7,1998 B-, /VTV^~>
Data recorded by Frank Phoenix J
START
STOP
JOB#
TRUCK
MIX TYPE
TICKET NO
MIX TEMP.
F
STACK
TEMP. F
ASPHALT
TEMP, F
ASPHALT
LOADED
AND
TESTED.
LBS
Asphalt by Mix
COMMENTS
13:09
13:13
9999
3
2
0VALUEI
410
303
345
32,121
32,121
19
0:36
6:43
2959
BLK
16
9483
398
228
350
48.569
8 45
8:52
2959
VOU
16
9484
401
321
47,966
6
12:43
12 52
2959
BLK
16
9485
394
350
47.996
144,531
11 45
11:50
9999
3
18
9511
357
368
30,211
30,211
15. 16
652
7:00
3057
WE 7
25
9512
411
255
315
66.121
1
701
709
3057
LC 544
25
9513
408
241
66,131
7:11
7:20
3057
COMO
25
9514
405
258
66.248
2
7:21
7:27
3057
SG 22
25
9515
407
331
48,289
3
7:38
7:46
3057
LC 36
25
9516
425
292
64.090
7:48
7:56
2948
LC 543
25
9517
387
290
325
63.619
8:11
8.19
3057
RS
25
9518
414
299
340
65.939
8:21
8:29
3057
MAC
25
9519
421
280
340
65.934
8:30
8:36
3057
LC 753
25
9520
403
312
48,078
8:38
8:44
3057
LC 757
25
9521
406
304
330
48,082
9:10
9:16
3057
WAD
25
9522
253
129
48,237
9:53
10.07
3057
WE 7
25
9523
147
88
320
65,744
7, 8. 12
10:13
10:24
3057
LC 544
25
9524
267
136
66,394
10:28
10:38
3057
COMO
25
9525
419
290
310
60,071
9
10:39
10:45
3057
SG 22
25
9526
408
280
48.222
10, 11
10:59
11:09
3057
LC 36
25
9527
167
127
316
64,072
11:10
11:20
3057
LC 543
25
9528
424
263
64,275
11:21
11:27
3057
LC 754
25
9529
401
299
47.935
11.31
11:40
3057
RS
25
9509
409
299
320
66,241
14
11:55
12:01
3057
LC 753
25
9512
383
321
48.168
17
12:06
12 15
3057
MAC
25
9513
305
66.025
12:32
12:40
3057
LC 757
25
9514
401
349
48.124
13:00
13:08
3057
WE 7
25
9515
420
296
65,886
18
1.368.125
644
651
3057
WAD
30
9484
391
233
315
48,358
48.358
852
8 55
8888
4
33
9485
398
318
20.123
8:56
859
8888
4
33
9486
396
319
20.005
5
12 23
12:31
8888
4
33
9487
359
311
11,947
12:53
12 56
8888
4
33
9489
381
340
20,069
72,144
8:07
8:10
8888
4
• 60
9492
441
266
17,966
17.966
4
Total
379 8
Total (lbs.)
1.713.456
1.713.456
Total (tons)
856.7
856.7
Comments {Exhaust refers to truck engine exhaust)
1
Can't Cover Truck Exhaust
2
Exhaust Stacks Too High • Exhaust Into TTE
3
Extended Test 7:27-7:36; Exhaust Not Completely Sealed
4
Port Change
5
Extended Test 8:59-9:09 (2.5 ppm).
6
Ticket Taken By Driver
7
Waiting On Trucks
8
Truck w/o Exhaust
9
Truck w/o Exhaust
10
Missed First Part of First Dump
11
Extend Test 10:45-10 56 (1.9 ppm)
12
Mix Temp Low When The Elevator is Empty
13
Dryer Shut Down
14
Did Not Sample Truck (C)
15
Port Change
16
No Cover On Exhaust
17
Tunnel Slow To Secure
18
Cam Cover Exhaust
19
Extended Test 13:13-13.23 (2.4 ppm) (Truck w/o RAP)
Procda~2.xls
-------
© fuy IfeMJS LovJ wtkrM TVff IS 0^t?C -SWr Ki (2) 1>idau.t -MWXF mveL-fcj
^ fcLT" dA^€ (3) Mo Ccvy^H P TE3.-T l?: <"V — (2 '{p^(l%vicLd-i^/o
I
1.
3
© 5"
b
I-
8
'1
10
11
II-
13
i*
(D k.
CD
CD
G>
®.
®^-J5
/f\ 2(5
© @ 'I
IV
\1%
21
iH
©-£
® *8
>1
30
31
S2j
f*3
3li
Asp>ffr-T fr-AMT U>
-gfrgjR.gj m/4
RuM *3
Date:
Pza-mK ?fe>£A/iy£
IO - f-yg
Te^r
T-spr *fo.
£rPr*-X
5r«P
* fa
«i^ " TiclfeT *
XMK- T^tP
Snv^ Tt »<+>
B/rTt^ TbTA-i-
(a'- 3fc
1?i_K
(t - ^
^<6
7-J-*8
¥6,
(o'.n1!
t:T\
W<^-P
3e -
311
11%
Me.3T8
U'.ri-
^.'00
ujt- -:h
ir - °r
LC-
!«? _
2-I1-
®?o
f. »18
v- 5"£
ic ^3,
zr - into
3e^
2-1 O
LS .&lj
»: 0?-
0 '• io
f
60-
tM(
2-(,&
6-. 1!
0: if
RS
1-s- - RH1S
'M
¦2-V\
t»r, 13^
S:x\
8- v\
zs- ^«f4
4^-1
7-%o
13 -f
8 'so
8: 3£»
LC 4S3
2-? - ^fis"
Hps
ZiT-
ys ,o^>
0: J8
0;
3« f
^8 og2_
S Wf
8--Sj_
Mok.
ifc - Wb-
Ht>\
32.1
£: Si-
S: sr
i
7? - °l H1$
3^8
zo, 15-3
8 . s-t
8:^
i
"5?.
Sit
3(
IS-- ffoo
zrs
/i-7
He. J-3^-
1'.S"3
jo: o"^
vir :?~
xr- iToi
Oi)
6r 74^/
'*•. I2>
LO' i4f
LC S"4:
5-^ ZZ-
2 5- -^ra'f
y»8
^8o
10:
ll-.oCt
LC -Zto
Jr-
(-i. o^-L.
|l." i£>
^ '• 2-6
LC
25"- cjfo fc
Z.t3
II -i (
|C. 2.sf—
LC 9- 7«"«/•
•2-S-- tS'o'?-
M&l
H1r1 Z?
tr. 3 1
u-Mo
RS
2.S- -
(e>(* XH(
it:
PLfw^T Do—
ptA>^r
1^: z-i
17 1 *2,1
33 - 1S~'^
3^
3I|
H.^^
i>:3>
i"3-: Ho
Lc.
- qrir
401
f8.«W
l"2-' 13
IZ-IST-
Bu<
It -
3
32., 12- |
Soi) Too - Ex4*W^T f*Tt.TT£" (s) TP5T"
Barre Plant Data Sheets ~7'it, , gVrtnv^r 63^*7^ J ^ pdR1-
£M&J3iao t«vr ¦&¦.?*,
i // ^^ ^ rf/^) CD Tktferr TA^m -8\j txLw/ «£*(?) w*
-------
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0LDB8Q0K RD.
BAKE, BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCIEB ST.
punvni^RAss.
12762
Job
COHI OF HASS.
RTE 9
LEICESTER
Custt 1
Job* 2959
Truck* BLK
Rixt 16
Kaae STATE DE8SE TOP
Operator
Ticket* 9483
Ti«e
Am T AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total!
Target
2S24
4900
576
6800
6:35:39
48
2571
4910
7480
10
576
576
8056
6:36:13
70
5560
4928
7'.°0
16
57?
577
16113
6:37:19
70
£500
4860
73b0
16
57:
579
2405c
6:38:25
88
5490
4878
7360
f5
573
c - -
J / j
31985
6:39:31
50
2560
5190
7750
i.4
C-.T
t , •
r ic
J ' )
4031*
6:41:83
70
2540
5140
^680
14
579
cir.
J ?
4856^
ig Tare
Asp Tar
Cost/Tori Percent Uj
Load Cost Amount Ian Dest Cham Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
24. £8
0f,: ;i 1
i; & Date
-.% 10/07/98
Fofc/Dfi Location
F £
t"3(
-------
CENTRAL r*ss. ASP'HftLl CD.
0L5 C'jLDBRDCK SS.
t"K'KE- i"r'.:
•j. jj:
5^-3::-?
.airc.e^
Jao
Casts i
-GkuSSG CORP.
TCr." uF
Vv i N'J
. ::a»e S;!i]
3-- ? ra.ro •
7ic-.?m
IE BINDER
'mi1*
l*t* RHi
iiiJC l!iL 7
H'Jl? - Hug C -ij'j w riou :
¦¦¦,: J .
^j3 *¦¦-£ '
hat- H__
HSp
i -j . r»..
Ta;c£-
C/60
*W
CJ C'j
6jz
6: n3: it- it
5S40 3/y 733
750
3 *bi
/ft 1:
353
35.
b: 44: j6 '3
t;:7.' -3a V;
330
isiC
"7-0 17
350
350
'3
^ r;t
it i;
3-i£0
'!:?: ^
iVi
3*3
3:43:5. *3
zi'-'i 7c-j /it
OiB
3533
? y.- 'i ..
3:3
•-"•3
t;4~*:5fc 70
3760 7it "38
798
£500
7500 15
3v3
0 j
t-: 49:03 53
3310 c:.6 "3?
:^8
3502
"375 :i
; 1
35*
ngg Tare
Hsp Tare
Cost/Ten :;
:,e?eer.t Tax load Cost
piitO-J'-'-t
"ax jest
C'iTje Total Cost
batcr, Totii
«0B6
«0e-
:ui3
3*e»5
40.3^
Loaon Joe Tctii _ ;iae s iii-e FcD/Bei Loc-mo".
1*2-
-------
3
Cu5tOBe?
CENTRAL ilHSS. HiPhHu! Cu.
CJ CGlDBROOK kD.
01005
5133-3:5-:: :j2
Joo
vilSt^t i
.G^uSSu Cui\K.
TCrti- Gr -I
"wING
J CPA
J0v
o r-_ur.Lf\ :¦ i
f
v-ikIO'jS ;
T-'UC-Kf!
UL 7
pLKiNvl'-L!.."
:hSS.
Hi. a
;D
02?62
Nase
STfiTE TOP 10* RftP
Operator
Ticks':
is 9485
Tise Ac a
I Hub 3 hG'3
r
•j
kOj i p;
Ag:; Total
T -:i
ft As? ;ctal
Kstf, Total
TaTjjet
1155
325
i:3S
3300
4b2
Cdjtf
b:D-i>
it Hie
eat
C4'3S
iitH
/ 730
3
4bb 4b-
619b
b:Ji:4a
50 ii£0
3b0
£4>
>330
^766
;5
4bi
1cM7
6:52:51
b0 1170
18
3320
"S7S
15
4b* 4b3
34/50
t:jd:j8
bi ..hi
'70
£540
-;59«
6060
•. c
4£f- 4t6
33299
b;55:84
70 lib?
7ts*
35it
jjCE?
¦¦¦')£
15
<...; 4Ci
41543
fc;5b:il
'.a ii70
000
Gti'i
:
-------
^r
C,:3t0ie?
luKuSSO CGrCp.
BElChER ST.
krtif'.VluLC^HSS.
0cji
«i005
5&6-ii5-2'?52
100
iOuri OF
vh?,IGu5
.svifiG
; . 11 ! b
C'.istP
ioDii
Truc«»
hix«
n<(S£
008 Pat£
T:c'30
7660
_ .j
¦H,3
468
6340
7:00:46
A?
1140
770
257y
3310
7790
l:
466
466
•b596
7:9i:5b
56
1150
6ia
c'M
3340
J i
4b0
460
24a56
7:83:0c
ye
1210
890
2556
3300
'953
16
460
332b6
7:04:03
80
10?-:
"'•?
2< 'J
iz;t
¦jeer,
i J JO
:6
h6;
461
412/7
7:05:14
90
1180
850
2460
3320
7830
i
462
4fcc
4356;
/:06:20
60
1150
820
2530
3270
7770
a
*61
¦<3i
57800
/:01:co
50
1200
640
2j30
3300
7676
it
461
461
b6l3l
g Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Tor, Percent Tax Loao Cost Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadtt
2
Jot Total
66.13
Tiae & Date
07:88:21 10/07/96
:QD/Llei Locator.
r j
I3>*f
-------
CCnTRAl. ^33.
OLD CCLDBROOK RD.
NKKE,r!HS;.
SlBb5__
iA>.
LUStOSe?
¦JUL
lUstP
LukUSSO corp.
7Own OF
EitvIfiG
Jddr 3£3':
3 BELCHES ST.
vriftlOoS
stke:7o
7 TUCKB LUftO
KLMifiviat.iiHSS.
ii;« £:
it/ be
waise sThTE TOP
lax RhP
Operator
T ic-K.ettf 3487
7:ne
fig5 T h53 mG
. j
hGG j
H'jb i
hs;; To:?!
H"ju "i H
Hip Totai
l-.jt:r Total
Te^qet
llS j
a j
5506
3388
-iDd
3250
7:11:10
43 :iye
85ft
£470
3450
7678
3 4b4
*6 4
6334
7:ii:5b
79 l i 7«
isg
"" -10
773i:
14 v£b
4'oE
1&7£4
7:13:63
30 1158
¦'.53
£5:e
3320
7&5B
la 4b4
43-
cj0o6
7;i4:03
/a ilea
m
ESsfc
o40U
7 3 It
14 -63
433
33411
; i b: i :i
.¦¦a ll?a
B4sj
asee
3330
7A^8
ii '-C:
tv! 1
41 /b£
7nb:£l
70 1172
756
£53i
w'c'Vf
7738
li 431
4t;
49953
7:17:c7
bi 1090
64e
£430
3310
7b 70
14 i!:;
M b 1
56064
7:i6:33
6a 1140
630
£490
3£40
7700
13 'it a
-i-4
bb£4d
9gg Tare
Hsp Tare
Cost/Tor: Percent Tax
Loaa Cos:
Hwcunt
Ta» Dest Cnarge Total Cost
LOV2B JuD
iota.
-
ii»e & Date
r OD/ tiei uOCatiO.":
bli.y.ki
F L
\3>
-------
b
CENTRAL flPSS. BSPHftlT CO.
OLD COLDBRGOK RD.
BfiRRE.flftSS.
'01085
506-355-2ybe
CustoBer
Job
ISt# 1
-ORubSO CORP.
TOyix OF
EsvlNG
J:tk 3057
3 BElCHER
ST.
^RlOUt
STREETS
Trucks 5G 22
PLhIpWILL
2 ,piHSS.
v-<4 25
02( 6c
Hase slait TOP
Gpe-at:r
Ticket? Mc
ly*
r;riP
Tiae
Targe;:
Hig T
Abi; 6 HG6
i icfl
C
J
6u0
hGC- c
£43 2
HGG 1
3200
HljO lOtdi
Hsp ¦ ftSP A
4-to
H5p
k-il
Baton Total
6066
?:28:4fl
3a
113b
fli8
d4j0
3210
760b
i Sn j
't4i
664*
7:21:38
40
1130
926
2470
3250
7670
13 446
446
16165
/:22:36
48
1140
810
245b
3210
b 16
;2 «51
45:
24226
7:23:43
68
1150
340
34-i£
3260
7680
12 44b
446
32352
7:£<(w
be
1850
6/0
2410
ritiB
7
-------
CEkTRAL MASS. AEPMftuT CC.
OLD ;OLDBROGK sD.
BARKt.ftAbb.
61005
508-3:*-59o5
lustoier
JOD
CustS 1
LGKJSSO CORP.
TOwn 3F
ERyiNG,
Jo is
3057
3 BELCHEF. ST.
VHKiuiib
oTRlEi5
T <>uckii LC 36
PLhINVILLI, HhSS
,
55
0576 5
Nasie
STATE TOP
10* RAP
Operator
Tickets
9489
Tise Ago T
AGG 3 flGG
5
flGG £
AGS 1
Ajg Total
Asp I ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1180
800
5425
3230
443
3060
7:37:08 £0
i 140
ate
24E0
7828
7
•-30
450
8070
7:37:49 50
1140
79S
2440
3510
7580
13
450
4:0
ibi&a
7:39:61 t-B
list
350
5380
3i60
7480
13
«47
44?
54007
7:40:07 50
1110
830
2430
3180
7538
15
446
44:
31965
7:41:13 80
1130
730
"440
2200
7568
13
446
44 i
33931
7:45:i9 60
ii50
8i0
5460
3540
7630
15
450
450
48011
7:43:55 70
1140
790
5430
3500
7560
11
44?
449
56050
71^4:31 /0
1110
S"0
5460
35i0
785a
11
450
400
6409a
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent lax Loas Cost Anount lax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
Job Total
Tiae 5 Sate
37:45:25 10/07/93
Fcb/Dei Location
-------
CEI^hl MASS. HSPHhlT
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BriRRE,fiP,oS.
01305
596-3:5 2952
10.
Custoae?
Jod
Cust# 1
luRuSSu LuRP.
i-Uhri. Or
11HS3.
Job# 2946
3 BtLCHER ST.
1/iST. J
/ CONTRfiCT # j
T ftijyJ Ll Dij
PLHliMLLE.HASS.
RTE. 1c
HSHbuRriHHPi
hix» 25
0c76c
Nase SThTl TuP
10* RftC
Operator
Tickets 9490
^Tise
Acq T PC-G 3 hGG
-¦
-iub 2 H
QG 1 Hqq Total
hS p i H j.-' H
hip Tot-si
Batch iotai
Target
7:45:52
11 £'0
800
2432
3200
448
8000
33
'J:l%
800
S39f
3210 7470
13 44£
442
7912
7:46:43
60
U26
u20
2400
3180 7520
10 4j1
451
15883
7:48:43
40
1130
810
2460
3230 7630
;8 44?
44/
23960
7:49:n9
30
1140
760
£4/0
32.30 7600
10 147
447
32007
"l.CQ.CC
t \JO5 JJ
63
1150
810
2430
3220 7613
10 $44
448
40065
7:52:01
50
1140
730
£363
3200 7436
11 4*7
44/
4794£
7:53:07
60
10/0
800
2420
3i60 7470
10 4j1
4j1
5o6b3
i:54:i3
60
1110
740
2460
3200 7510
10 4SG
446
63819
Agg Tare
ftsp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tat Load Cost ftraount Tax Dest Change Total Cost
LoaaS Job Total Tue & Date Fob/Del Location
i 31.91 07:55:06 10/07/98 F £
136
-------
UStOMT__
CHARGE SALE
hCCT.OH file
Target
8:06:18
8:86:56
6:06:51
Agg Tare
CENTRAL PiASS. ASPHfiL i CO.
OLD COLDBR0QK RD,
BftRRl,HflSS.
81005
586-3ji: •. 'id
JoD
MUNICIPAL PhwnG
LUStR
joDtf 6866
i f-net;to s
riixii by
Naite PEO^lE'S TuP
Upera'-o:
Tickets
Agg T AGG £
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
3120
2508
372
38 3100
2570
5£?0
11
378
378
50 30/8
2*50
jj£0
1
w / 0
3?3
50 oHS
i5c:8
5bb0
b
373
i J
9492
Batch Total
6008
Se48
U933
i (?fco
Cost/Ton
Load!)
Asp Tare
Percent Tax
Load Cost Haiourit Tax uest Cnarge Total Cost
JOD 'Otcu
6.9S
Tioie i Date
86:39:i7 i8/u?/98
roD/uei Location
f £
-------
CENTRAL MASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLBBROOK RD.
BARRE.M5S.
01305
508-355-2952
Custoaer
Job
Custtt
lOR'JoSu corp.
IQwH ur
ERvI'iG
Jobt?
3051
3 BELCritR ST.
VARIOUS
STREETS
Tracks R 3
PLAINvlLLE.ilASb.
iiixit
2j
02762
Nase
STATE TOP 10* RAP
Operato
Ticketfi
T
9493
Time Acq T
AGG 3__ AGO
tr
J
AGG 2
hGG 1
ngg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Paten lotal
Target
ii jj
825
2506
3300
462
8250
6:10:03 50
1130
330
2520
3320
7300
L
463
4bU
ac60
6:10:47 50
1030
£40
2540
3300
7770
a
toS
462
16492
6:i2:18 50
H40
350
2540
3290
7820
•;
466
466
2*766
6:13:24 50
U70
760
2450
3250
/630
t
463
'ibv'
32673
6:14:30 60
1100
730
2430
3260
/620
9
*60
460
40953
8:15:3b 60
1150
873
2510
3360
7690
0
464
464
49307
6:16:42 60
1170
760
2540
3230
7780
t
4bl
461
57548
b:17:49 30
1170
900
2520
3340
7930
4b i
461
65939
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Loac Cast ftnoimt Tax Best Charge Total Cost
Loadi Job Totai Tiae a Date
7 212.65 06:16:42 13/07/96
Fob/Dei Location
F 2
14-o
-------
uENjRA'l i':AS3. ASi-'Hhu CO.
Olu CGlDBkOOK rd.
triRREjilAbo.
S1085
508-355-295£
Customer
LGRU5S0 CORP.
3 BELCHER_ST.
PLflliWlLLt.HASS.
027uC
Job
TOM OF ERVING_
VriKlOUS STRtE I b'
Cust# 1
Job# 365?
Truest) ilfiC
Hi*)?
Haie STATE
OpeT-ator
Ticket*
TOP 10* RAP
9494
Time
Aqq T A6G 3 AGG 5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg
1 lota I Asp
i ASP A Asp
lotal
Batch Total
Target
U55
855
2508
338c
462
8250
a: 1 j:26
10
li 50
84&
2i30
3310
7836
6
4 j j
82B5
8:£8:09
50
1100
820
2440
3260
7636
6 465
465
16380
8:2E:06
j8
ii&8
830
2516
3310
/a 10
9 4t!
465
24655
8:23:15
30
1160
810
2530
3330
7850
'1 4bt;
465
32970
8:24:20
50
H50
840
2530
3290
/810
9 4:9
459
41239
8:25:2?
40
1180
840
2j40
jjc'0
7880
i 4b2
462
43561
8:2b:33
56
1170
860
2530
3280
7840
9 462
462
57883
6:27:39
30
1100
800
245«
3240
7590
8 4b 1
461
65934
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax
Load Cost
Amount
Tax
Dest Ctiarge
Total Cos:
Load#
JC'D_
1 Ot-J 1
-
ise S
Date Foe/Dei Location
a
c
45. 62
08:28:31
10/07/
98
f 2
141
-------
Custoser
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
FtAINVILLE.ilASS.
0£?G£
CENTRAL flASb. ASPHALT LU.
OLD CDLDBhuOK RD.
BARRELS.
0i005
D0B-j55-c3jc
Job
TOWN OF ERVING
VARIOUS STREETS
Custft i
JobS 30j7
Truck# LC 753
Nix# £5
Haie STATE TOP 10* RAP
uperator
Ticket#
9495
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 3 AGG
J
AGb c A
GG 1
Target
1120
660
2432
3200
6:23:2/
20
U30
/70
2t20
3220
6:30:89
60
1140
6i0
2440
3230
8:31:30
20
1120
770
2460
3210
6:32:3b
40
ii30
i60
2430
3200
6:33:42
50
1060
790
2490
3i50
6:34:4b
40
Hi0
730
24/0
3ia0
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Age Total Asp
7540
/ bE0
7560
7620
7516
/o40
Cost/Tovi Percent Tax Load Cost ftnount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
T ASP
A
Asp Total
batcn lotal
448
6000
6
446
446
7966
b
j3
4jo
i60i9
10
449
449
24868
6
444
444
32i32
A
446
446
40066
9
450
^56
460/o
Load#
9
Job Total
269.66
Tiae J Date
5:35:41 10/07/96
!¦ ob/Del Location
F E'
K
-------
CENTRAL rlflSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD CGLDBROOK RD.
BARREjHASS.
01805
506-355-2952
CustoHer
LORUSSQ CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINvILLtjUftJ
62762
Tine
Target
8:3b:22
8:37:03
8:38:55
8:40:02
8:41:08
8:42:i 4
Agg Tare
Hgg i
20
59
20
40
50
58
Joo
Lllbtn 1
TuWH OF ERvlNG
JoDfi 3057
VARIOUS
oTRttlb
Truck# LC 757
Mix# 2j
Naae STATE TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9496
AC-b 3 AG6
J
HUU c
Hijb i H
GQ ;Otdi
Hip • H
448
1120
800
2432
3200
1140
848
2448
3250
7670
7 446
1120
780
2430
3220
7550
6 450
1120
810
24/S
3230
.'630
9 448
1160
820
c42o
3210
7bi0
9 400
1090
758
2368
3150
7370
9 448
1110
6i0
2430
3210
7560
•i 450
Asp Tare
10* h>i
Asp Total Li-itcn ;otal
8800
446 8116
4j0 itilib
448 24194
4j0 occjs
446 40072
450 4S062
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Amount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
.oadtt Job Total
10 293.70
Tise i Date
3i-:43:3? 10/07/%
:oo/Dei Location
^3
-------
oustoaer
lGKUSSG luaF.
3 BELCHER SI.
PLftlHVlLlE.HftSS.
02762
Ct^lRftL ilASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBkuuK KB.
BmRRE,MASS.
oi00j
506-355-2952
JOu
uu'ilii Of IIHbo.
RTE 9
LEICESTER
i/U5tfl i
J GDB c'Jj'j
Truck# YuU
Hix» lb
Nave STATE DENSE
Operator-
Ticket# 9497
TOP
Tiae
Acg I
AGG 2 AGG 1
Asp T ASP
A .
Asp Total
Batch total
Target
2524
4'i03
j7b
8086
6:43:4b
30
4928
747b
6
5b7
567
60o/
6:44:2b
58
4928
?4b8
b
0/
579
ib67fc
8:46:08
40
2550
4860
7410
6
579
579
24065
8:47:13
60
2520
4900
7420
5
575
575
32060
8:48:19
50
2480
4830
7310
5
578
578
39948
8:49:26
50
2530
4910
7440
5
578
578
47966
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
2
Job Total
48.26
Tiie & Date
08:50:19 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OS FILE
CENTRAL HAS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBROOK RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
HUIICIPAL PAVIKG
Ti«e
Target
8:52:03
8:52:32
8:53:47
Agg Tare
*99 T
20
56
40
AGG 2
3087
3090
3100
3100
Asp Tare
AGG 1
3150
3170
3180
3200
Agg Total Asp T ASP A
430
6260 4 427
6280 6 430
6300 6 426
CllSt#
Job# 8888
Truck# 4
Hix# 33
laae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9438
Asp Total Batch Total
6667
427 6687
430 13397
426 20123
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
10.06
Tiae & Date
08:54:42 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OM FILE
CENTRAL NASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BASSE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
HUHICIPAL PAVIHG
Cust#
Job# 8868
Truck* 4
Hix# 33
Raae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9499
Ti«e
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
3087 3150
430
6667
8:55:24
20
3030 3170
6200
6
429
429
6629
8:55:59
50
3090 3180
6270
6
433
433
13332
8:57:39
50
3100 3140
6240
7
433
433
20005
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Tori Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
2
Job Total
20.06
Tiae & Date
06:58:34 10/07/96
Fob/Del Location
F 2
Ku
-------
IV
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE,HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBRQQK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
TOW OF ERVING
VARIOUS STREETS
Cu8tt 1
Job* 3857
Truck* HAD
Hit* 25
Haae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9588
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp t asp A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1120
888
2432
3280
448
8888
9:89:59
28
1180
798
2420
3188
7498
4
446
446
7936
9:10:38
58
1140
818
2440
3198
7588
9
450
458
15966
9:11:45
38
1138
888
2440
3238
7688
9
446
446
24812
9:12:51
38
1138
818
2450
3288
7598
8
449
449
32051
9:13:57
48
1138
810
2440
3248
7628
8
450
458
40121
9:15:03
58
1158
838
2470
3228
7670
8
446
446
48237
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
11
Job Total
317.82
Tiae fc Date
89:15:57 10/87/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
LORUS90 CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIHVILLE, (I ASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOVH OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Job# 3857
Truck! WE 7
Hixl 25
laae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket#
9501
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
625
2508
3300
462
8250
9:57:55
10
1160
830
2510
3250
7750
6
456
458
8208
9:56:36
20
1110
790
2440
3240
7580
14
462
462
16250
9:59:42
50
1130
810
2530
3360
7830
13
464
464
24544
10:00:51
40
1160
820
2510
3290
7780
15
460
460
32784
10:01:56
60
1170
820
2490
3300
7780
13
462
462
41026
10:03:01
30
1150
840
2530
3270
7790
12
460
460
49276
10:04:07
30
1180
820
2500
3300
7800
12
461
461
57537
10:05:14
50
1170
810
2460
3300
7740
12
467
467
65744
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
12
Job Total
350.69
Tiie & Date
10:06:06 10/07/96
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD C0L0B800K RD.
BARRE,HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOW OF ERVIKG
VARIOUS STREETS
Custf 1
Jobf 3057
Truck# LC 544
Hixf 25
Haae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9502
Tiae A
aa T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total I
ksp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
825
2508
3300
462
8250
10:14:12
10
1120
840
2520
3300
7780
7
458
458
8238
10:14:54
20
1150
810
2550
3310
7820
13
464
464
16522
10:16:00
30
1140
840
2490
3320
7790
12
464
464
24776
10:17:06
50
1170
830
2540
3280
7820
12
464
464
33060
10:18:13
30
1110
830
2540
3300
7780
13
458
458
41298
10:19:18
30
1340
830
2470
3320
7960
14
462
462
49720
10:21:09
40
1270
820
2490
3310
7890
13
462
462
58072
10:22:15
58
1190
840
2510
3320
7860
14
462
462
66394
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
13
Job Total
383.89
Tiie & Date
10:23:24 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
IP
Customer
LORUSSO C(»P.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIRVILLE, HASS.
02762
CEHT8AL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBfiOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
81W5
588-355-2952
Job
TOW OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Job# 3857
Truck# CORO
Hix# 25
laae STATE TOP 18X
Operator
Ticket# 9583
RAP
Tin
Agg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total 1
ksp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
825
2588
3388
462
8258
18:29:15
18
1258
818
2588
3318
7878
6
462
462
8332
18:38:83
38
1228
828
2518
3388
7858
14
468
468
16658
18:31:88
58
1178
828
2538
3268
7788
14
462
462
24892
18:32:15
68
1178
848
2538
3328
7868
14
464
464
33216
18:33:21
48
1118
888
2468
3268
7638
14
463
463
41389
18:34:27
58
1158
838
2498
3328
7798
14
462
462
49561
18:35:33
68
1188
818
2538
3348
7868
14
462
462
57883
18:36:39
68
1168
838
2478
3278
7738
15
458
458
66871
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
14
Job Total
416.93
Tiae & Date
18:37:31 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
l^O
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAINVILLE,BASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARREL tUSS.
eiM5
588-355-2952
Job
TONI OF ERVIIG
VARIOUS STREETS
Custl 1
Jobl 3857
Truck! 5G 22
lit! 25
law STATE TOP 18X RAP
Operator
Ticket! 9584
Tiae
*gg T
AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1128
888
2432
3288
448
8888
18:38:88
38
1138
828
2468
3328
7738
17
445
445
8175
18:38:51
58
1138
798
2458
3148
7518
15
447
447
16132
18:48:28
78
1888
798
2488
3328
7598
15
449
449
24171
18:41:25
88
1128
888
2418
3178
7588
14
448
448
32119
18:42:32
78
1148
798
2468
3328
7718
15
448
448
48277
18:43:38
88
1128
798
2478
3128
7588
16
445
445
48222
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaouot Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load!
15
Job Total
441.84
Ti»e & Date
18:44:38 18/87/96
Fob/Del Location
F 2
iSl
-------
1/
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE,BASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,BASS.
01085
508-355-2952
Job
TOW OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cll8t# I
Job# 3057
Truck# LC 36
Bix# 25
Haae STATE TOP 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket#
9505
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Tarqet
1120
800
2432
3200
448
10
59:37
40
1140
800
2430
3160
7530
10
453
453
7983
11
00:22
90
1140
820
2430
3300
7690
17
449
449
16122
11
01:28
60
1080
790
2370
3170
7410
17
448
448
23980
11
02:34
90
1100
810
2420
3170
7500
17
450
450
31930
11
03:40
70
1120
810
2440
3330
7700
17
449
449
40079
11
04:46
70
1140
800
2430
3130
7500
17
444
444
48023
11
05:53
90
1140
800
2470
3160
7570
17
452
452
56045
11
06:58
140
1120
790
2460
3210
7580
17
447
447
64072
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Amount Tax Dect Charge Total Cost
Load#
16
Job Total
473.06
Ti«e & Date
11:07:51 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
CEHTRAL.
CO.
Custoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE,HASS.
02762
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOVH OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Job* 3057
Truck# LC 543
Hixt 25
Haae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket* 9506
Tiae A
qq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Tarqet
1120
800
2432
3200
448
8000
11
10:23
60
1110
AAA
Ovv
2400
3320
7630
12
445
445
8075
11
11:11
80
1090
AAA
Ovv
2410
3170
7470
18
451
451
159%
11
12:18
90
1160
790
2470
3350
7770
18
451
451
24217
11
13:23
90
1110
830
2450
3150
7540
18
446
446
32203
11
14:30
80
1140
AAA
Ovv
2380
3170
7490
18
446
446
40139
11
15:36
70
1070
780
2400
3200
7450
17
449
449
48038
11
16:42
80
1140
780
2460
3250
7630
17
449
449
56117
11
99
17:48
Tare
90
1130
Asp Tare
810
2480
3290
7710
17
448
448
64275
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load*
17
Job Total
505.22
Tiae & Date
11:18:41 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
1/\
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHES ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT Ca
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOVM OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Custt 1
Job* 3057
Truck# LC 754
Hix# 25
law STATE TOP 10* RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9507
Tiae
Agg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1120
800
2432
3200
448
8M0
8106
11:20:06
40
1150
810
2470
3230
7660
13
446
446
11:20:48
80
1120
790
2430
3120
7460
17
450
450
16016
11:21:53
60
1090
790
2370
3330
7580
17
448
448
24044
11:23:00
80
1110
820
2440
3140
7510
17
445
445
31999
11:24:06
60
1120
770
2440
3220
7550
17
447
447
399%
11:25:12
70
1140
800
2430
3120
7490
18
449
449
47935
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
18
Job Total
529.19
Tiae I Date
11:26:04 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
LQRUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIWIILE, BASS.
82762
CEHTRIL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COlDBfiOOK RD.
BARRE, BASS.
81005
588-355-2952
Job
TOVR OF EBVIIG
VARIOUS STREETS
Custf 1
Job* 3057
Truck! R S
Hix# 25
Hue STATE TOP 111
Operator
Ticket! 95M
RAP
Tiae A
qq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
825
2588
3388
462
8258
11
31:87
48
1158
828
2538
3268
7768
11
463
463
8223
11
31:49
58
1178
818
2568
3278
7818
17
462
462
16495
11
32:55
88
1168
898
2518
3318
7878
17
463
463
24828
11
34:81
88
1178
818
2478
"M4U
JTIV
7898
17
462
462
33188
11
35:87
68
1158
888
2588
3278
7728
17
463
463
41363
11
36:13
68
1128
828
2588
3388
7748
17
462
462
49565
11
37:19
88
1388
848
2518
3338
7988
18
459
459
58884
11:38:26
48
1898
838
2518
3348
7778
17
467
467
66241
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost kmmt Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
19
Job Total
562.31
Tiae & Date
11:39:18 18/87/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Custoaer
CASH SALE
CUST. m FILE
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD OXJ»itOOK RD.
BARRE.BASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
DfilVBr
Cu8t#
Job!
Truck#
Nix#
tare
Operator
Ticket!
9999
9999
3
18
STATE BIIDER
9511
Ti«e
Agg T AGG 4 AGG
3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2625
844
844
2813
375
7501
11:45:26
40 2770
830
850
2950
7400
12
372
372
7772
11:46:13
70 2650
830
850
2920
7250
16 .
373
373
15395
11:47:19
50 2570
AAA
OOv
840
2770
6980
17
377
377
22752
11:48:25
40 2620
830
800
2830
7080
16
379
379
30211
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total Tiae & Date Fob/Del Location
1 15.11 11:49:18 10/87/98 F 2
-------
caMM»T
BAMEThASS.
CO.
Customer
LOBUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE,HASS.
02762
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOW OP ERVING
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Jobt 3057
Truck# LC 753
Nixt 25
laae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9512
Tiae
Agg T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
tap T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1120
800
2432
3200
448
8000
11:53:56
30
1100
790
2440
3180
7510
10
443
443
7953
11:54:36
40
1110
780
2500
3160
7550
15
449
449
15952
11:55:42
70
1140
820
2470
3210
7640
15
449
449
24041
11:56:48
40
1120
800
2440
3220
7580
15
452
452
32073
11:57:54
70
1130
800
2440
3200
7570
15
448
448
40091
11:59:00
40
1140
810
2450
3230
7630
16
447
447
48168
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadf
20
Job Total
586.39
Tiie & Date
11:59:53 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Customer
LORUSSO COBP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE,HASS.
02762
CENTRAL RASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBfiOOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
TOHH OF ERVIKG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Jobt 3857
Truck# HAC
Hixi 25
Haae STATE TOP 10X RAP
Operator
Tickett
9513
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
825
2588
3380
462
8258
12:05:22
30
1150
820
2530
3290
7798
10
457
457
8247
12:06:03
50
1190
840
2500
3290
7828
16
466
466
16533
12:07:09
70
1120
820
2440
3258
7638
16
463
463
24626
12:08:14
60
1140
810
2480
3390
7828
16
462
462
32988
12:09:21
60
1170
820
2538
3260
7780
16
459
459
41147
12:10:27
80
1160
820
2530
3318
7820
16
464
464
49431
12:11:33
80
1170
820
2558
3338
7870
16
465
465
57766
12:12:40
70
1158
810
2528
3328
7800
16
459
459
66825
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
21
Job Total
619.40
Tiae & Date
12:14:10 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
IS8
-------
-A
Custoaer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OH FILE
CENTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
HUMICIPAL PAVING
Tiae
Target
12:28:36
12:29:02
Agg Tare
Agg T
40
AGG 2 AGG 1
2778 2835
2730 2880
2740 2830
Asp Tare
*99
Cust#
Jobt 8888
Truck# 4
Six# 33
Kaae 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9514
Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
387
OvOT
5610
12
382
382
5992
5570
19
385
385
11947
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
4
Job Total
36.11
Tiae & Date
12:29:57 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
1*1
-------
30
Customer
LOSUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIM?ILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL HAJS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
TOHH OF ERVIKG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust* 1
Job* 3057
Truck# LC 757
Hix# 25
Haw STATE TOP 10K RAP
Operator
Ticket#
9515
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP
A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1120
800
2432
3200
448
owo
12:33:12
50
1120
790
2500
3310
7720
13
450
450
8170
12:33:59
90
1120
820
2430
3130
7500
18
450
450
16120
12:35:04
80
1150
820
2370
3180
7520
17
450
450
24090
12:36:10
50
1070
820
2410
3180
7480
17
446
446
32016
12:37:16
50
1100
810
2450
3240
7600
16
448
448
40064
12:38:22
80
1130
820
2460
3200
7610
16
450
450
48124
Agg Tare
Aap Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
22
Job Total
643.46
Tiae & Date
12:39:15 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
IfeO
-------
Customer
LORUSSO COfiP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIIVILLE, HASS.
02762
CE1TRAL SASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBffiOK RD.
BABRE,USS.
01005
518-355-2952
Job
COM OF HASS.
RTE "
LEICESTER
Custt 1
Job# 2959
Truck# 8LI
Hiz# 16
laae STATE DEKSE TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9516
Tiae A
eg T AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2524
4900
576
12:44:12
39
2510
4900
7410
12
570
570
7980
12:44:45
60
2560
4910
7470
15
579
579
16829
12:46:26
50
2550
4890
7440
15
578
578
24047
12:47:31
70
2530
4900
7438
15
577
577
32054
12:48:37
60
2540
4900
7440
15
572
572
40066
12:49:43
50
2460
4890
7350
14
560
580
479%
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
3
Job Total
72.26
Ti»e A Date
12:50:37 11/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
AH
-------
Customer
CHARGE SALE
ACCT.OI FILE
CENTRAL IUSS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLOBSOOK RD.
BARRE.HASS.
01005
508-355-2952
Job
HURICIPAL PAVIKG
Cust#
Job!
Truck# 4
Six# 33
laie 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9517
Tiae
Agg T
AGG 2 AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp t asp A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
3087 3150
430
6667
12:52:39
20
3100 3150
6250
13 427
427
6677
12:53:08
40
3100 3150
6250
14 431
431
13358
12:54:41
60
3110 3170
6280
15 431
431
20069
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
5
Job Total
46.14
Tiie & Date
12:55:36 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
[t) V-
-------
Cuatoaer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIKVILLE, HASS.
02762
CEMTRAL HASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COL&B80OK m.
BARRE, HASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
TQIM OF ERVIH6
VARIOUS STREETS
Custt 1
Job# 3857
Truck# *E 7
Six# 25
Urn STATE TOP 101
Operator
Ticket# 9518
RAP
Tiae
Aqq T AGG 3 AGG
5
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T
ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
1155
825
2508
3300
462
8250
12:58:07
20
1140
810
2500
3380
7750
11
464
464
8214
12:59:32
50
1150
790
2510
3310
7760
16
464
464
16438
1:00:47
50
1170
810
2490
3288
7750
15
461
461
24649
1:01:52
50
1170
810
2540
3320
7840
16
464
464
32953
1:02:59
50
1170
820
2490
3290
7770
16
458
458
41181
1:84:05
40
U20
820
2460
3270
7670
15
462
462
49313
1:05:11
30
1160
810
2520
3320
7810
16
462
462
57585
1:06:17
70
1160
840
2550
3290
7840
16
461
461
65886
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
23
Job Total
676.41
Ti»e I Date
13:07:10 10/07/98
fob/Del Location
F 2
IU3
-------
<>
Customer
CASH SALE
CUST. OH FILE
CENTRAL MASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,SASS.
01005
588-355-2952
Job
DRIVEWAY NIX
Cust#
Jobl
Truck#
Nix*
Hate
9999
9999
3
2
1/2 BINDER
1
*39
Ti«e
Target
Agg T
88 20
10
Tare
8
59
AGG 3 AG6 2 AGG 1
2540 2700 2400
2510 2700 2410
2810 2710 2410
2560 2730 2410
50 2460 2630 2340
Asp Tare
Operator
Ticket# 9519
Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
360 8000
7620 13 356 356 7976
7930 15 363 363 16269
7700 15 361 361 24330
7430 14 361 361 32121
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Loadl
1
Job Total
16.06
Tiae & Date
13:11:52 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
-------
Datasheet
A->AWrr pWT T>
"BAR.lteTj /V\ A Date: 10-7-70
ji i Ttv^c
Tu^fctT'
C< r7
SAfCrl -TbTtH-
6:2-4: 5«>
i '.gil :e>8
u 2~
t -2- «»
H8,
t: fS • lU
8: »K.:
Lc tr«f
2ST
vHi
d'.eC
18,
II."*: HT
11: vf: %i~
H
10, IfeO
Barre Plant Data Sheets
It 5"
-------
Customer
LORUSSO CORP.
3 BELCHER ST.
PLAIHVILLE, HASS.
02762
CENTRAL RASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBROOK RD.
BARRE,RASS.
01065
508-355-2952
Job
TOM OF ERVIHG
VARIOUS STREETS
Cust# 1
Job# 3057
Truck# LC 757
Hixi 30
llaae STATE BlIOER 101 RAP
Operator
Ticket# 9482
Tiw
Aqq T AGG 4 AGG
5
AGG 3
AGG 2
AGG 1
Agg Total
Asp T ASP A
Asp Total
Batch Total
Target
2780
800
746
800
2520
352
8000
6:26:38
50
2860
730
750
810
2500
7650
11
349
349
7999
6:27:38
70
2820
800
760
790
2520
7690
20
349
349
16038
6:28:37
80
2700
750
780
840
2530
7600
21
351
351
23989
6:29:55
50
2870
770
760
860
2550
7810
20
355
355
32154
6:31:02
70
2740
760
710
770
2490
7470
19
351
351
39975
6:32:08
50
2770
940
750
850
2500
7810
18
352
352
48137
Agg Tare
Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aiount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load#
1
Job Total
24.07
Tiie I Date
06:33:02 10/07/98
Fob/Del Location
F 2
I (ab
-------
CENTRAL SSSS. ASPHfii T
OLD COLDBROOK f:D.
&hF:R£. hf)S£.
81005
506-355-295c!
Custoser
LORUSSuCDRP.
3 BElCHs-R ST.
(¦'LhlNViLtE, MASS.
02762
Job
TOwri OF ERvING
vhRIOUS STREETS
LUStff i
JOBS 00jI
Track# LC 754
fin# 2j
Nase STATE TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9491
10i RAP
Tine
Td'f C6t
Agg T
AGG o AGG
1120
j
600
Mbfj c
2432
AGG 1
3200
Agg )otaI
Asp T
ASP A
446
Hsp Totai
Batcn lotai
6000
7:58:15
20
1160
820
2470
3230
7630
3
450
450
6130
7:56:57
60
1140
796
2440
3153
,'l£0
44b
446
16096
6:00:19
40
1090
600
coi0
3210
7490
10
447
447
54033
6:0i:25
40
llc0
900
2«4B
3l70
<630
10
445
44 j
32106
6:02:22
20
i 130
830
24/0
7676
11
451
4j1
40229
8:04:48
30
1368
828
2440
319«
7810
11
447
4i~
48486
3g Tare
Asp Tare
-ercs'
Tax Load Cost AaGunt lax Dest Charge lotai Cost
.oad*
6
Jcd Jotai
1/9.66
Tiae i Date
08:65:40 10/07/93
hOD/Jei Location
F 2
-------
-------
t
CENTRAL BASS. ASPHALT CO.
OLD COLDBKOOK RD.
BARRE, BASS.
11005
508-355-2952
Customer Job Cust# 8688
CHARGE SALE HUHICIPAL PAVIHG Job# 8888
ACCT.01 FILE Truck# 4
Bix# 33
la* 3/8 TOP
Operator
Ticket# 9510
Tiae Agg T AGG 2 AGG 1 Agg Total Asp T ASP A Asp Total Batch Total
Target 3887 3150 430 6667
11:39:58 60 3110 3100 6210 16 430 430 6640
11:40:36 80 30S0 3220 6270 15 429 429 13339
11:42:22 80 3110 3280 6390 15 431 431 20160
Agg Tare Asp Tare
Cost/Ton Percent Tax Load Cost Aaount Tax Dest Charge Total Cost
Load# Job Total
3 30.14
Tiae & Date Fob/Del Location
11:43:16 10/07/98 F 2
-------
ASPHATL PLANT D - RESULTS FROM ADVANCED ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES
Asphalt Binder Samples - ASTM Analysis Results for Asphalt Plant D in Barre, MA
Two analyses were performed at three temperatures (300, 325,and 350 Degrees F)
1. ASTM D1754-94 - Effects of Heat and Air on Asphalt Materials; Thin Flim Oven Test (TFOT)
2. ASTM D2872-88 - Effects of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt; Rolling Thin Film Ovent Test (RTFOT)
Oven Temp. 325 F
Oven Temp. 300 F
Oven Temp. 350 F
Sample
Sample
Day
Sample
Date
Time
Number
ID
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
8/18/98
nav
Pretest
A1
-0.197
-0.365
na
na
na
na
9/25/98
nav
Pretest
A2
-0.215
-0.414
na
na
na
na
9/30/98
nav
Pretest
A3
-0.168
-0.310
na
na
na
na
Average
-0.193
-0.363
Oven Temp. 325 F
Oven Temp. 300 F
Oven Temp. 350 F
Sample
Sample
Day
Sample
Date
Time
Number
ID
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
10/5/98
9:03 AM
Day 1
LA1B
-0.117
-0.216
-0.048
-0.089
-0.228
-0.400
10/5/98
1:08 PM
Day 1
LA1E
-0.095
-0.192
na
na
na
na
Average
-0.106
-0.204
-0.048
-0.089
-0.228
-0.400
Oven Temp. 325 F
Oven Temp. 300 F
Oven Temp. 350 F
Sample
Sample
Day
Sample
Date
Time
Number
ID
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
10/6/98
8:07 AM
Day 2
LA2B
-0.107
-0.206
-0.047
-0.105
-0.253
-0.395
10/6/98
1:03 PM
Day 2
LA2E
-0.151
-0.285
na
na
na
na
Average
-0.129
-0.246
-0.047
-0.105
-0.253
-0.395
Oven Temp. 325 F
Oven Temp. 300 F
Oven Temp. 350 F
Sample
Date
Sample
Time
Day
Number
Sample
ID
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
10/7/98
10/7/98
8:46 AM
1:15 PM
Day 3
Day 3
LA3B
LA3E
-0.111
-0.175
-0.218
-0.304
-0.045
na
-0.109
na
-0.229
na
-0.380
na
Average
-0.143
-0.261
-0.045
-0.109
-0.229
-0.380
Oven Temp. 325 F
Oven Temp. 300 F
Oven Temp. 350 F
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
TFOT
RTFOT
THREE DAY AVERAGE
-0.126
-0.237
-0.047
-0.101
-0.237
-0.392
Thin Film Oven Test
Rolling Tin Film Oven Test
300 F
325 F
350 F
300 F
325 F
350 F
THREE DAY AVERAGE
-0.047
-0.126
-0237
-0.101
-0.237
-0.392
Notes:
nav = not available
na = not applicable, i.e., analysis was not performed
Daatdata.xls
-------
ADVANCED ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES
LABORATORY AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
TEST REPORT
Test Report No.: 03840003.DOC ¦. " ¦ : page I of I
Report Date: 09/21/98 | X | Original I [ Amended
Client:
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
560 Herndon Parkway, Suite 200
Herndon Virginia 20170-5240
Project No.: WO#384
Description: Mass Loss Study for Pacific
Environmental
Report Distribution: Mr. Frank Phoenix
Sample No.: AC601
AC602
FS403
FS494
Date Received: 9/2/98
Sample Description: "Plainville Plant, AC, 8/18/98" - AAT# AC601
"Barre Plant, AC, 8/18/98" -AAT# AC602
"Plainville Plant, RAP, 8/18/98" - AAT# FS493
"Barre Plant, RAP, 8/18/98" -AAT# FS494
Technical Responsibility
Technical Contact
Name William Pennington
Name: Kevin J. Knechtel
Title: Binder Team Leader
Title: Laboratory Nfonagpr,
Signature:
Signature: ^dJn/V
Date:
-------
ADVANCED ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES
LABORATORY AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
TEST REPORT
Test Report No.: 03840006.DOC page 1 of I
Report Date: 10/05/98 | X j Original I | Amended
Client:
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
560 Herndon Parkway, Suite 200
Herndon Virginia 20170-S240
Project No.: WO#384
Description: Mass Loss Study for Pacific
Environmental
Report Distribution: Mr. Frank Phoenix
Sample No.: AC627 & AC628 Date Received: 9/28/98 - 10/2/98
Sample Description: "Lorusso/Barre 9/25/98 PG64-22" - AAT# AC627
"Lorusso/Barre 9/30/98 PG64-22" - AAT# AC628
Technical Responsibility
Technical Contact
Name / William Pennington
Name: Kevin J. Knechtel
Title: Binder Team Leader
Title: Laboratory Manager i ,
Signature: jfj jJL—
Signature: t).
Date:
Date: ' / /^A ^
Comments: - This a true record of test results obtained by Advanced Asphalt Technologies, L.P. in
accordance with the test methods and procedures stipulated by AASHTO/ASTM.
Test Results
Test
Method
Test Result
AC627
AC628
Mass Change, using the Thin Film Oven Test
(TFOT) at 325°F
ASTM D 1754
-0.215
-0.168
Mass Change, using the Rolling Thin Film Oven Test
(RTFOT) at 325°F
ASTM D 2872
-0.414
-0.310
1 P<~1—
A3
Advanced Asphalt
Technologies, LP
108 POWERS COURT, SUITE 100
STERLING, VA 20166-9321
PH
PH
FX
(800) 39$ 6686
(703) 444 4200
(703) 444 4368
-------
ADVANCED ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES
LABORATORY AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
TEST REPORT
Test Report No.: 03840009.DOC page 1 of 2
Report Date: 11/05/98 | X | Original | | Amended
Client:
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
560 Herndon Parkway, Suite 200
Herndon Virginia 20170-5240
Project No.: WO#384
Description: Mass Loss Study for Pacific
Environmental
Report Distribution: Mr. Frank Phoenix
Sample No.: See Below
Date Received: 10/19/98
Sample Description: "See Below
Technical Responsibility
Technical Contact
Name William Pennington
Name: Kevin J. Knechtel
Title: Binder Team Leader
Title: Laboratory Manag^ , ,
Signature: /yy^
Signature: y.
Date: "
Date: ^ ///sVW
"Comments: —-^Flns a-true record testfesirits-tfbtaiiiecHjy-AdvaBeed-Asphah-Teehndlegfes.ir.Prin- - —
accordance with the test methods and procedures stipulated by AASHTO/ASTM.
TEST RESULTS
Mass Change of Asphalt Samples, %
Rolling Thin FilmOven Test
Thin Film Oven Test
ASTM D 1754
ASTM D 2872
PES Sample
AA T Sample
Temperature (F)
Temperature (F)
ID#
IDft
300
325
350
300
325
350
LA1B
AC630
-0.089
-0.216
-0.400
-0.048
-0.117
-0.228
LA1E
AC631
-0.192
-0.095
LA2B
AC632
-0.105
-0.206
-0.395
-0.047
-0.107
-0.253
LA2E
AC633
-0.285
-0.151
LA3B
AC634
-0.109
-0.218
-0.380
-0.045
-0.111
-0.229
LA3E
AC635
-0.304
-0.175
IT
Advanced Asphalt 108 POWERS COURT, SUITE lOO PH (800) 395 6686
Technologies, LP sterling, va 20166-9321 ph (703) 444 4200
FX (703)444 4368
-------
ADVANCED ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES
LABORATORY AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
TEST REPORT
Test Report No.: 03840009.DOC
Report Date:
11/05/98
| X | Original
| | Amended
page 2 of 2
Asphalt
Moisture
PES Sample
AA T Sample
Content, %
Content, %
ID#
ID#
ASTM D 2172
RC1B
FS536
5.83
2.04
RC1E
FS537
RC2B
FS538
5.32
1.95
RC2E
FS539
RC3B
FS540
5.40
1.52
RC3E
FS541
Advanced Asphalt
Technologies, LP
108 POWERS COURT, SUITE 100
STERLING, VA 20166-9321
PH (800)395 6686
PH (703)444 4200
FX (703)444 4368
-------
ASPHALT PLANT D IN BARRE, MA - ASPHALT TEMPERATURES AT LOAD-OUT
Measurements taken by Josh Berkowitz with PES
TEST 1
Temperature. F
TEST 1
Date
Time
Truck#
PES 1
PES 2
Plant
Comments
10/5/98
9:30
YOU
326
10/5/98
9:37
LC 575
325
Thermometer not wiped off
10/5/98
9:43
WAD
295
Thermometer not wiped off
10/5/98
10:20
LC 751
285
Temp of material in plant was 290.
10/5/98
10:32
BLK
295
Temp of material in plant was 290.
10/5/98
10:52
WAD
299
Temp of material in plant was 290.
10/5/98
11:18
LC 542
295
Temp of material in plant was 290.
10/5/98
11:37
LC 751
304
10/5/98
11:50
LC 757
308
10/5/98
12:08
WAD
315
10/5/98
12:16
5 G
315
10/5/98
12:34
LC 543
318
Average
306.7
TEST 2
Temperature, F
TEST 2
Date
Time
Truck#
PES 1
PES 2
Plant
Comments
10/6/98
7:22
WAD
315
315
10/6/98
7:30
BLK
350
350
No RAP in mix
10/6/98
7:36
5G22
320
320
10/6/98
8:46
LC 752
315
320
10/6/98
9:08
LC 751
325
325
10/6/98
9:15
LC 757
320
320
10/6/98
9:48
WAD
330
325
10/6/98
10:19
LC 542
332
335
10/6/98
10:40
LC 543
330
330
10/6/98
11:20
LC 751
320
325
10/6/98
11:47
BRN
350
350
No RAP in mix
10/6/98
12:02
WAD
320
325
10/6/98
13:20
LC 36
305
320
May not have kept thermometer in long enough
10/6/98
13:27
LC 752
320
325
Average
325.1
327.5
PES 1 data used in report
TEST 3
Temperature, F
TEST 3
Date
Time
Truck#
PES 1
PES 2
Plant
Comments
10/7/98
6:45
BLK
350
No RAP in mix
10/7/98
6:52
WAD
315
10/7/98
7:03
WE 7
315
10/7/98
7:58
LC 543
325
330
10/7/98
8:21
RS
340
345
10/7/98
8:31
MAC
340
345
10/7/98
8:47
LC 757
325
330
10/7/98
9:18
WAD
325
325
10/7/98
10:09
WE 7
320
320
10/7/98
10:42
COMO
310
311
10/7/98
11:11
LC 36
315
315
10/7/98
11:43
RS
320
320
10/7/98
12:18
MAC
305
305
10/7/98
12:55
BLK
350
355
10/7/98
13:25
3
345
345
Average
326.7
328.8
PES 1 data used in the report
Notes:
1. Asphalt cement temperatures were taken with 12" dial thermometers.
Z The dial thermometers were inserted into the hot asphalt in the bed of the truck just after load-out
3. The dial thermometers were left in the asphalt until the temperature readings stabalized.
4. Thermometer PES 2 was used the first and third day.
5. Thermometer PES 1 was used the second and third day.
6. A plant thermometer was also used on the second day.
Hi
BarredatxIsAsphatt Temp
-------
MIX FORMULA SUMMARY, ASPHALT PLANT D, MASSACHUSETTS
MIX NUMBER
MATERAL
FEED BIN
2
8
10
15
16
18
24
25
30
33
60
67
3/4" or 1 1/2" Stone, pounds
4
703
700
700
695
RAP, pounds
5
200
200
200
1/2" Stone, pounds
3
635
285
225
372
225
617
280
187
3/8" Stone, pounds
2
675
285
225
670
631
225
354
608
200
926
1040
600
Sand,pounds
1
600
627
750
836
1225
750
728
800
630
945
836
1273
Liquid Asphalt, pounds
A
90
100
100
122
144
100
101
112
88
129
124
127
Total, pounds
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Mixform.xls
-------
From: RON MYERS
To: RTPMAINHUB:RTPMAINHUB.INTERNET:"sklamm@mriresearch...
Date: 2/10/00 8:40am
Subject: Hot Mix Asphalt - Plant D Mix formulae
Frank/Scott
Attached is a FAX (in Acrobat PDF format) I received from Dave Laflamme concerning the bin usages and Mix
formulae used by Plant D. I think this would almost satisfy the desire of some to determine what was made during
our test. Although the Mix Designs Dave has specifically listed comprise more than 80% of the production, to fully
satisfy their desires we should add the lesser used mixes. The following are other Mixes that are listed in Table 3.1
of the PES test report. I have calculated the formulations per ton of total mix as Dave has on his FAX. All of this
should be part of one of the Appendices of the Plant D report
Bin
Mix 24
Mix 2
Mix 8
4
-
-
703
5
200
-
-
3
619
635
285
2
355
675
285
1
730
600
627
A
96
90
100
Total
2,000
2,000
2,000
Bin
Mix 16
Mix 15
Mix 33
4
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
3
-
372
-
2
631
670
926
1
1225
836
945
A
144
122
129
Total
2,000
2,000
2,000
Bin
Mix 18
Mix 60
Mix 67
4
700
-
-
5
-
-
-
3
225
-
-
2
225
1040
600
1
750
836
1275
A
100
124
129
Total
2,000
2,000
2,000
CC:
TONEY-MIKE, U\MASON-BILL
-------
Lorusso Corp.
3 McharSt.
Platnvfll*. MA 02762
Phona: (508) 006 32S2 *259
Fax; (506) 643 9411
Toi Ron Myers
Frwnt
David J. LaFlamme
Fan (919) 541 1039
Dalai
January 27.2000
Pfconm (916) 541 5407
Pageei
2
Rai Asphalt plant tickets
CCi
File
Urgant X Far Kwtow PIwmw Cemwiit PImm R*p(y PImm Recycle
Ron,
In our plants the following is standard: bin #1 = sand, bin #2= 3/8" stone, bin #3= 1/2"
stone, bin #4= 3/4" or 1-1/2" stone, bin #5= recycle asphalt and bin "Au= liquid
asphalt
On the ticket there can be 12 columns depending on the mix design, and they are as
follows: column #1= batch time, c#2= aggregate scale tare weight, c#3=agg bin 4
net wgt. c#4= agg bin 5 net wgt., c#5= agg bin #3 net wgt., c#6« agg bin #2 net wgt.,
c#7= agg bin 1 net wgt., c#8= agg total, c#9= asphalt scale tare wgt., c#10= asphalt
net wgt., c#11 = asphalt total wgt, c#12= batch total cumulative weight.
Next on the ticket there can be several rows depending on load size, the first of which
is: r#1= selected bins for use, r#2= Target scale weights, r#3= Actual weights
achieved by bin and so on.
MIX DESIGNS
#10
24
25
30
MATERIAL
BIN 4
700
695
3/4* or 1-1/2" stone ^
SIN 5
200
200
200
RAP ;
BIN 3
225
617
280
187
1/2" stone
BIN 2
225
354
608
200
3/8" stone /
BIN 1
750
728
800
630
sand ^
BIN A
100
101
112
88
Liquid Asphalt
2.000
2,000
2,000
2,000
TOTAL POUNDS
01/27/00
m
-------
I hope this information is helpful in answering any questions you may be confronted
with regarding plant operations and ingredients within a given mix design. There are
always variables in this process such as material weights per bin can change
because of sieve analysis results of manufactured aggregates. Typically, these
changes are minor in nature but they do occur periodically.
If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact my office at
(508) 695 3252 X259.
David J. LaFiafnme
VP Engineering
IY6
-------
APPENDIX C
EPA METHOD 315 ANALYTICAL DATA
1*1
-------
P.O. Box 2010
Morrisville, NC 27560
Ph. (919) 468-7800
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
Narrative
Site: Asphalt Plant D
Prepared for: Frank Phoenix (PES)
Prepared by: Lin It Nguyen
Description of Procedures for EPA Method 315 and Observations:
Filters -
Procedure:
The filters (including any loose particles) were transferred to a tared amber jar. The amber jars were placed into
a desiccator overnight in a temperature controlled environment. The following day, the samples were weighed
and initial weights were taken. To ensure that all conditions remained the same, the samples were placed back
into the desiccator and allowed to sit overnight and the second weighings were taken at the same time the next
day. Once constant weight had been attained, 100 mL of methylene chloride was added to each jar. The jars
were placed in a sonicator and allowed to sonicate for 3 minutes. After sonication was complete, the samples
were taken out of the sonicator. Each sample was filtered through a buchner funnel reinforced with an additional
Whatman 934-AH filter to prevent cross contamination on the buchner funnels. Once the solutions were
vacuum filtered, the extract was placed into a triple rinsed beaker (methylene chloride solvent). The beaker
containing the extract was placed onto a hotplate at low heat and the solvent was allowed to evaporate. Once the
samples almost reached dryness, the samples were taken off the hotplate and poured into a tared aluminum pan.
The beakers were triple rinsed with methylene chloride and then the solvent was poured into the aluminum pan.
The rinse was performed to ensure that no material remained in the beaker. The aluminum weighing pan was
heated to complete dryness, placed into a desiccator and allowed to sit in the desiccator overnight. The
following day, the samples were weighed and the weights recorded.
Observations:
The filters had dark gray/black discoloration, especially in places where the air flowed through the filters. All
contents of the filters and any loose particles were transferred to a tared 250 mL amber jar.
Acetone Front Half Rinse-
Procedure:
The rinses were poured into 400 mL tared beakers that were triple rinsed with methylene chloride. The weights
of the beakers including the rinses were taken to give an initial and a final weight from which the volumes of the
rinses were calculated. A separate sheet (attached) explains how the volumes were calculated. The beakers
containing the rinses were allowed to sit overnight in a hood to allow the acetone solvent to evaporate. The next
day the beakers, which now contained no solvent, were placed into the desiccator and allowed to sit in the
desiccator overnight. The next day, initial weighings for the samples were taken. The samples were then allowed
to sit in the desiccator again for 24 hours. The next day at approximately the same time, the samples were
weighed again for the second weighings. Once constant weight was attained, the weights were recorded for the
I Bo
Page 1 of 4
-------
Particulate Mass (PM) portion of the analysis. Next, 25 mL of methylene chloride was added to each beaker.
Aluminum foil was placed over the tops of the beakers. The beakers were then placed into a sonicator and
allowed to sonicate for 3 minutes. This fraction was combined with the methylene chloride Front Half Rinse.
Observations:
No conditions out of the ordinary were noted.
Methylene Chloride Front Half Rinse-
Procedure:
The rinses were poured into 400 mL tared beakers triple rinsed with methylene chloride. The weights of the
beakers including the rinses were taken to give an initial and a final weight from which the volumes of the
rinses were calculated. At this point, the extracts from the Acetone Front Half Rinse were combined with this
fraction. The combined fractions were placed onto a hotplate and allowed to heat gently at a low temperature
setting. Once the solution had almost reached dryness, the solution was poured into a tared aluminum pan. The
pan was then placed back onto the hotplate and taken to complete dryness. The pans were then transferred to the
desiccator and allowed to sit overnight. The following day, the samples were weighed and the weights recorded
for the MCEM analysis.
Observations:
No conditions out of the ordinary were noted.
Impinger, Back Half Water-
Procedure:
The samples were poured into a clean, pre-weighed, 500 mL amber jar. After the impinger contents had been
emptied into the jar, a second weight was obtained. The difference was then used to calculate the volume of the
sample. Once the volume had been determined, each sample was poured into a clean, 1000 mL separatory
funnel. Once in the separatory funnel, the amber jars containing the original samples were triple rinsed with
methylene chloride and the rinses poured into the separatory funnel. The approximate volume of this rinse was
50 mL. The samples were then shaken for 1 minute. After 1 minute, the bottom methylene chloride layer was
drained into a clean, 250 mL beaker. After the methylene chloride was drained, an additional 25 mL of MeCl2
was added. The solution was then shaken for another minute and the bottom methylene chloride layer drained
into the same 250 mL beaker. This process was repeated once more. Once the third shake was completed and
the methylene chloride drained into the 250 mL beaker, the beaker was placed onto a hotplate and gently heated
to evaporate the solvent. Once the solution was evaporated almost to dryness, the solution was transferred to a
tared aluminum pan. The pan was then placed back onto the hotplate and heated to complete dryness. After
heating, the pans were placed into the desiccator to sit overnight. The following day, the pans were weighed and
the weights recorded for the MCEM analysis of the Impinger, Back Half Water Rinse.
Observations:
The samples looked cloudy upon initial inspection. They did not seem to consist solely of water. During the
extraction of these samples, the solution formed what seemed like an emulsion between the water and
methylene chloride layer. When the methylene chloride was drained, this emulsion layer was left behind, so that
only the methylene chloride layer was taken.
(St
Page 2 of 4
-------
Acetone, Back Half Rinse-
Procedure:
The exact same procedure was used for the Back Half Rinse as was used for the Front Half Rinse. The only
difference was that since PM analysis was not required, when the solvent dried down in the beaker, constant
weight was not taken for these samples. After the solvent had evaporated, 25 mL of methylene chloride was
added to each beaker and sonicated for 3 minutes each. The rest of the procedure was the same as the Acetone
Front Half Rinse.
Observations:
No observations out of the ordinary were noted.
Methylene Chloride, Back Half Rinse-
Procedure:
The solution was poured into a tared beaker. After the solution had been poured into the beaker, another weight
was taken to calculate the volume. Once the volume had been determined, the sample was filtered through the
buchner funnel. The extract was placed into a clean, 250 mL beaker. The beaker containing the rinse was placed
onto a hotplate and gently heated almost to dryness. Once the rinse was almost dry, the solution was transferred
to a tared aluminum pan. The pans were placed back onto the hotplate and the solution heated to complete
dryness. Once the pans were dry, the aluminum pans were transferred to a desiccator and allowed to sit
overnight. The following day, the pans were weighed and the weights recorded as the MCEM values for the
methylene chloride Back Half Rinse.
Observations:
No observations out of the ordinary were noted.
Field Reagent Blanks-
Procedure:
The samples were poured into tared beakers. Weights were taken after the reagent blank rinses were poured in.
These final weights were used to calculated the volumes of the reagent blanks. The reagent blanks were allowed
to sit on a hotplate at low heat. After the solvents had evaporated, the final weights of the beakers with any
contents remaining were taken. Particulate Mass was calculated. For the filter blank, 100 mL of methylene
chloride was added to the beaker and sonicated for 3 minutes. Afterwards, the methylene chloride was filtered
and poured into a clean beaker. The beaker containing the solvent was heated down to near dryness. The solvent
was then transferred to a tared aluminum pan. The pan was placed onto the hotplate and reduced to dryness. The
pan was desiccated and weighed the next day for Particulate Mass.
Observations:
No observations out of the ordinary were noticed.
I—
Page 3 of 4
-------
Laboratory Reagent Blanks-
Procedure:
The same procedures were used for Laboratory Reagent blanks as for the Field Reagent Blanks. Solvents that
were used during the extraction process were tested in the reagent blank. A filter from the same lot that was sent
to the field was used to go through the extraction process.
Observations:
No observations out of the ordinary were noticed
Deposition Samples-
Procedure:
Each one of the deposition samples was poured into a pre-weighed beaker. If the entire sample did not fit into
one beaker, then it was separated into 2 or more beakers. The samples were allowed to sit in the hood overnight
to allow the solvent to evaporate. The next day, initial weights were taken on the beakers containing the
samples. The samples were allowed to sit overnight before a second weighing was taken. Once the samples had
attained constant weights, the weights were recorded for the Particulate Mass (PM) analysis. Once the PM
analyses were finished, 25 mL of methylene chloride was added to each beaker. The samples were covered with
aluminum foil and placed into a sonicator to sonicate for 3 minutes. After sonication was complete, the samples
were filtered through a buchner funnel and MCEM analysis was done using the same method as described in
methylene chloride FHR (for MCEM analysis).
Observations:
Some of the samples had very high volumes and so they had to be separated into 2 or more beakers. Slow
heating of the samples had to be performed to prevent any of the samples from popping or cracking. The
samples showed some signs of coagulation as the liquid decreased to a minimum amount. Since the samples had
to be completely dry, the samples were initially allowed to sit on the hotplate at low heat for approximately six
hours. After this period of time, the sample still had some "tar-like" properties, which indicated that the sample
was still not completely dry. This coagulation into a tar-like property raised the question of how long to heat the
samples since low heat would not cause the "tar" to evaporate. Eventually, the heat was increased in order to
drive the samples to complete dryness. Once the judgment was made that the samples were dry, the samples
were desiccated overnight to get constant weights. For the MCEM analysis portion of the extraction process, the
same complications arose. Once the samples had evaporated to almost dryness, there remained a small portion
of a "tar-like" residue. The samples would not produce a valid weight when weighed "as is" because in doing
so, some samples produced an MCEM value which was greater than the PM value, which is not possible. Upon
observation of this anomaly, the samples were allowed to sit at high heat until all the "tar-like" appearance had
evaporated leaving only a black organic residue. During the evaporation process of this stage, the sample
produced smoke, indicating that there might be some organics being driven off as aerosolized particles. One can
not conclude, however, how much, if any, organic analytes are being driven off. In conclusion, the values
produced for the MCEM analysis for the deposition samples represent minimum values for this analysis.
Page 4 of 4
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix = FILTERS
Weight of
Filter Pre-weight
Avg. wt. Of
Final weight of
Sample ID:
Amber jar (g)
(9)
filter+jar (g)
filter PM (g)
M315-1-F (100198-05)
169.4491
0.3409
169.7918
0.0018
M315-2-F (100198-09)
167.3514
0.3363
167.6932
0.0055
M315-3-F (100198-07)
167.8462
0.3391
168.1872
0.0019
M315-6-F [1] (100198-01)
167.7654
0.3403
168.1073
0.0016
M315-6-F [2] (100198-04)
167.9357
0.3362
168.2777
0.0058
M315-7-F (100198-08)
167.7704
0.3378
168.1264
0.0182
M315-8-F (100198-06)
167.7067
0.3390
168.0485
0.0027
M315-FB1-F (100198-03)
167.1318
0.3386
167.4705
0.0001
M315-FB2-F (100198-02)
167.9323
0.3361
168.2684
0.0000
Method =
MCEM
Weight of
Weight after
Final weight of
Sample ID:
Alum, pan (g)
evaporation (g)
MCEM (g)
M315-1-F (100198-05)
1
1.6680
1.6693
0.0013
M315-2-F (100198-09)
2
1.6659
1.6663
0.0004
M315-3-F (100198-07)
3
1.6658
1.6664
0.0006
M315-6-F [1] (100198-01)
4
1.6673
1.6677
0.0004
M315-6-F [2](100198-04)
5
1.6712
1.6718
0.0006
M315-7-F (100198-08)
6
1.6622
1.6638
0.0016
M315-8-F (100198-06)
7
1.6681
1.6697
0.0016
M315-FB1-F (100198-03)
8
1.6582
1.6583
0.0001
M315-FB2-F (100198-02)
9
1.7429
1.7429
0.0000
IM
Page 1 of 6
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix =
Method =
Sample ID:
M315-1-FH-A
M315-2-FH-A
M315-3-FH-A
M315-6-FH-A
M315-7-FH-A
M315-8-FH-A
M315-FB1-FH-A
M315-FB2-FH-A
Acetone FHR
EM
Volume of
liquid (mL)
91.8
175.3
164.8
90.1
92.7
129.8
97.1
101.1
Weight of
beaker(g)
111.2533
103.7245
102.7141
113.6420
107.1585
102.9506
113.5846
113.7496
Final weight of
rinse(g)
111.2695
103.7495
102.7281
113.6695
107.1823
102.9602
113.5850
Final weight of
filter PM (g)
0.0162
0.0249
0.0140
0.0275
0.0238
0.0096
0.0004
113.7505
0.0008
Matrix =
Methylene Chloride FHR
Method =
Sample ID:
M315-1-FH-M
M315-2-FH-M
M315-3-FH-M
M315-6-FH-M
M315-7-FH-M
M315-8-FH-M
M315-FB1-FH-M
M315-FB2-FH-M
MCEM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Volume of
liquid (mL)
80.0
98.5
88.5
90.7
89.2
105.4
84.7
Weight of Alum,
pan (g)
1.6371
1.6387
1.6578
1.6430
1.6490
1.6480
1.6646
Weight after
evaporation (g)
1.6386
1.6392
1.6581
1.6445
1.6492
1.6483
1.6647
92.3
1.6272
1.6273
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
0.0015
0.0005
0.0003
0.0015
0.0002
0.0003
0.0001
0.0001
Page 2 of 6
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix =
Solvent BHR
Method =
Sample ID:
M315-1-BH-S
M315-2-BH-S
M315-3-BH-S
M315-6-BH-S
M315-7-BH-S
M315-8-BH-S
M315-FB1-BH-S
M315-FB2-BH-S
MCEM
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Volume of
liquid (mL)
180.3
170.8
126.4
192.8
182.7
185.4
241.4
198.2
Weight of Alum,
pan (g)
1.6588
1.6655
1.6537
1.6653
1.6668
1.6762
1.6637
1.6599
Weight after
evaporation (g)
1.6595
1.6660
1.6545
1.6666
1.6673
1.6768
1.6637
1.6601
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
0.0007
0.0005
0.0008
0.0013
0.0005
0.0006
0.0000
0.0002
Matrix =
Method =
Sample ID:
M315
M315
M315
M315
M315
M315-
M315
M315
•1-IMP H20
•2-IMP H20
-3-IMP H20
-6-IMP H20
•7-IMP H20
¦8-IMP H20
FB1-IMP H20
•FB2-IMP H20
H20 Impinger rinses
MCEM
Volume of
liquid (mL)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
279.7
405.0
338.2
281.2
270.2
203.3
330.9
Weight of Alum,
pan (g)
1.6558
1.6600
1.6645
1.6742
1.6595
1.6665
1.6630
Weight after
evaporation (g)
1.6567
1.6606
1.6649
1.6758
1.6617
1.6672
1.6634
307.5
1.6716
1.6717
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
0.0009
0.0006
0.0004
0.0016
0.0022
0.0007
0.0004
0.0001
te.
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix =
Method =
Sample ID:
CP1 - Ceiling Plate
CP2 - Ceiling Plate
CP3 - Ceiling Plate
CP4 - Ceiling Plate
CP5 - Ceiling Plate
CPBIank - Ceiling Plate Blk
BE1 - Ceiling Beam
BE2 - Ceiling Beam
BE3 - Ceiling Beam
BE4 - Ceiling Beam
BE5 - Ceiling Beam
BEBIank - Ceiling Beam Blk
E1A - Elbow Bend (1 side) - [1]
E1A - Elbow Bend (1 side) - [2]
E1B - Elbow Bend (3 sides) - [1]
E1B - Elbow Bend (3 sides) - [2]
E1 Blank - Elbow Bend Blk
E2A - Elbow Bend (1 side)
E2B - Elbow Bend (3 sides)
E2Blank - Elbow Bend Blk
Deposition Samples
EM
Volume of
liquid (mL)
138.4
138.3
112.3
144.4
106.5
83.2
199.1
164.5
184.3
134.1
185.1
120.1
209.9
170.7
268.4
230.6
267.8
253.1
249.7
196.6
Weight of
beaker(g)
188.7011
190.4239
190.2507
191.1617
194.4285
187.8606
189.7796
190.8499
192.5560
191.1950
188.5549
192.4630
188.6042
191.1933
188.7055
190.8564
178.6420
177.2705
178.4876
175.1560
Final weight of
rinse (g)
188.7336
190.4574
190.2649
191.1852
194.4499
187.8638
189.8136
190.9636
192.7926
191.2284
188.5842
192.4772
188.7546
191.3234
188.7900
191.1140
178.6963
177.5972
178.8030
175.2159
Final weight of
filter PM (g)
0.0325
0.0335
0.0142
0.0235
0.0214
0.0032
0.0340
0.1137
0.2366
0.0334
0.0293
0.0142
0.1504
0.1301
0.0845
0.2576
0.0543
0.3267
0.3154
0.0599
184-
Page 4 of 6
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix = Deposition Samples
Method = MCEM
Sample ID:
Volume of
liquid (mL)
Weight of Alum,
pan (g)
Weight after
evaporation (g)
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
CP1 - Ceiling Plate
1
138.4
1.6641
1.6687
0.0046
CP2 - Ceiling Plate
2
138.3
1.6601
1.6631
0.0030
CP3 - Ceiling Plate
3
112.3
1.6669
1.671
0.0041
CP4 - Ceiling Plate
4
144.4
1.5828
1.5876
0.0048
CP5 - Ceiling Plate
5
106.5
1.6412
1.6447
0.0035
CPBIank - Ceiling Plate Blk
6
83.2
1.6636
1.6662
0.0026
BE1 - Ceiling Beam
7
199.1
1.6630
1.6678
0.0048
BE2 - Ceiling Beam
8
164.5
1.6484
1.6541
0.0057
BE3 - Ceiling Beam
9
184.3
1.6658
1.6786
0.0128
BE4 - Ceiling Beam
10
134.1
1.6700
1.6751
0.0051
BE5 - Ceiling Beam
11
185.1
1.6587
1.6636
0.0049
BEBIank - Ceiling Beam Blk
12
120.1
1.6428
1.6463
0.0035
E1A - Elbow Bend (1 side) -
[1]
13
209.9
1.6373
1.6533
0.0160
E1A - Elbow Bend (1 side) -
[2]
14
170.7
1.6578
1.6684
0.0106
E1B - Elbow Bend (3 sides)
-[1
15
268.4
1.6652
1.6856
0.0204
E1B - Elbow Bend (3 sides)
-[2
16
230.6
1.6671
1.6801
0.0130
E1 Blank - Elbow Bend Blk
17
267.8
1.6735
1.6823
0.0088
E2A - Elbow Bend (1 side)
18
253.1
1.6650
1.6912
0.0262
E2B - Elbow Bend (3 sides)
19
249.7
1.6660
1.6848
0.0188
E2Blank - Elbow Bend Blk
20
196.6
1.6688
1.6764
0.0076
Page 5 of 6
-------
Phoenix(Asphalt Plant D)
Matrix =
Method =
Sample ID:
M315-Filter Blk (100198-10)
Sample ID:
M315-ACE Blk
M315-MeCI Blk
M315-DI Water Blk
Sample ID:
Lab Blank - Filter
Lab Blank - Acetone
Lab Blank - MeCI2
Method =
Sample ID:
M315-Filter Blk
Matrix =
Method =
Sample ID:
AC-1 - Acetone Blk
MC-1 - MeCI2 Blk
WA-1 - Dl Water Blk
Method =
Sample ID:
F-1 - Filter Blk
Blanks
W
Weight of
Amber jar (g)
168.4604
Volume of
liquid (mL)
250.7
209.1
254.7
Volume of
liquid (mL)
200.4
176.2
MCEM
Weight of
Alum, pan (g)
10
1.7353
Previous Blanks
W
Volume of
liquid (mL)
200.3
189.1
199.3
MCEM
Weight of
Alum, pan (g)
11
1.7264
Avg. wt. Of
filter+jar (g)
168.7989
Weight of
beaker(g)
187.2768
190.3888
177.5518
Weight of
beaker(g)
188.6254
189.9936
190.6747
Weight after
evaporation (g)
1.7353
Weight of
beaker(g)
188.0787
188.1987
188.8102
Weight after
evaporation (g)
1.7264
Filter Pre-
weight (g)
0.3384
Avg. wt. Of
beaker+cont.
187.2771
190.3889
177.5520
Avg. wt. Of
beaker+cont.
188.6255
189.9937
190.6751
Avg. wt. Of
beaker+cont.
188.0789
188.1987
188.8104
Final weight of
filter PM (g)
0.0001
Final weight of
filter PM (g)
0.0003
0.0001
0.0002
Final weight of
PM (g)
0.0001
0.0001
0.0004
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
0.0000
Final weight of
filter PM (g)
0.0001
0.0000
0.0002
Final weight of
MCEM (g)
0.0000
I 81
Page 6 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D
MCEM DEPOSITION DATA
K°\o
-------
MCEM Deposition in TTE Exhaust Duct
The TTE exhaust duct work, from the TTE exhaust plenum to the sampling locations, included 2 elbows
and a long section of straight run. MCEM deposited in the 2 elbows during the test program was
recovered and used to estimate MCEM deposition in the entire ductwork upstream of the sampling
locations. The impaction surfaces of the two elbows were the only impaction surfaces in the ductwork.
Samples recovered from these sections were used to represent MCEM impaction deposition. Samples
collected from the non-impaction areas of the elbows were collected and used to represent the non-
impaction MCEM deposition. These MCEM deposition values, along with the ratio of areas calculations
shown below were used to estimate MCEM deposition in the TTE exhaust duct.
MCEM Catch from M 315 Analysis, grams
Elbow 1A Deposition (impact zone), grams
Elbow 2A Deposition (impact zone), grams
0.0266
0.0262
Total Deposition Impact Zone, grams
0.0528
Elbow 1B Deposition (non-impact zone), grams
Elbow 2B Deposition (non-impact zone), grams
0.0334
0.0188
Total Deposition in Non-impact Zone Sample area, grams
0.0522
Surface Area Values, square feet
Total Area of Non-impact Zone, square feet
Non-impact Sample Area, square feet
Ratio of Areas non-impaction
205.18
53.27
3.852
Exhaust Plenum, square feet (assumed to be the same as Plant C exhaust plenum)
Impaction Sample Area, square feet (assumed to be 1/3 of non-impaction area)
Ratio of Areas impaction (assumes entire exhaust plenum is impaction)
158.95
17.76
8.95
Deposition Estimates, pounds
Estimate of Deposition in Non-impaction zone, grams
Estimate of Deposition in Impaction zone, grams
Estimate of Total MCEM Deposition, grams
Estimate of Total MCEM Deposition, pounds
0.2011
0.4727
0.6738
1.48E-03
Asphalt Production, tons
Day 1 - October 5, 1998, Tons
Day 2 - October 6, 1998, Tons
Day 3 - October 7, 1998, tons
1,172.9
1,184.6
921.1
Three Day Total
3,278.6
Deposition Estimates, pounds per ton
Estimate of MCEM Deposition, pounds per ton of asphalt loaded
4.53E-07
NOTE: SEE THE PICTURE ON THE NEXT PAGE
Mcemdep2.xls
-------
Page 1 of 1
-pre ^ ^ A
<&c.r**l ot St7^(<5«4t f-^
Mrfrr n * Top CLs^W
£l- 3oTTt>AV. B--8ov*J
file://P:\S517.002\REPORTA980779 9.JPG
3/23/99
-------
MCEM Deposition on C-Channels
The ratio of the total C-channel areas to the test C-channel areas, along with the test C-channel analytical results, were used to
calculate MCEM deposition as shown below.
C-Channel
Section No.
MCEM
Catch, g.
Length of each
C-Channel, ft.
Cross-sectional surface
area of C-Channel, fP/ft
No. of C-Channels
in each section
Surface areas, ft2
Total MCEM Deposition
based on ratio of areas, g
Total Section
Test Channel
Ratio of areas
BE1
0.0048
15.42
1.49
15
344.56
2 98
115.625
0.5550
BE2
0.0057
15.42
1.49
13
298.62
2.98
100.208
0.5712
BE3
0.0128
15.42
1.49
11
252.68
2.98
84.792
1.0853
BE4
0.0051
15.42
1.49
14
321.59
2.98
107.917
0.5504
BE5
0.0049
15.42
1.49
13
298.62
2.98
100.208
0.4910
TOTAL 3253
BE Blank 0.0035 grams
Asphalt Production in Tons
Day 1 1172.9
Day 2 1184.6
Day 3 921.1
TOTAL 3278.6
Total MCEM deposition on the C-Channel in lb/ton = 2.19E-06
NOTE: SEE THE PICTURE THAT FOLLOWS THE NEXT PAGE
Mcemdepl .xls,Channel
-------
MCEM Deposition on Ceiling
The ratio of the total Ceiling areas to the test plates areas, along with the test plate analytical results, were used to calculate MCEM deposition as shown below.
Length of
Width of
Total Ceiling
Length
Cross-sectional
Surface area of
No. of
Total Surface
Net Ceiling
Surface
Ratio
Total MCEM
Ceiling
MCEM
Ceiling
Ceiling
Section surface
of each
surface area of
each C-Channel in
C-Channels in
Area covered
surface
area of test
of
Deposition based
Plate No.
Catch, g
Section, ft
Section, ft
Area, ft2
C-Channel, ft
C-Channel, ft2/ft
contact with ceiling, ft
each section
y Channels, ft
area, ft2
plate, ft2
areas
on ratio of areas, g
CP1
0.0046
15.42
21.25
327.60
15.42
1.49
1.93
15
28.9
298.7
4
74 7
0 3435
CP2
0 0030
15.42
21.50
331.46
15 42
1.49
1.93
13
25.1
306.4
4
76.6
0.2298
CP3
0.0041
15.42
19.00
292.92
15.42
1.49
1.93
11
21.2
271.7
4
67 9
0.2785
CP4
0.0048
15 42
18.50
285.21
15 42
1.49
1.93
14
27.0
258.2
4
64 6
0.3099
CP5
0.0035
15 42
19.00
292.92
15.42
1.49
1.93
13
25.1
267.9
4
67.0
0.2344
TOTAL 1.396
|CE blank 0.0026 grams
Asphalt Production in Tons
Day 1
1172.9
Day 2
1184.6
Day 3
921 1
TOTAL
3278.6
Total MCEM deposition on the ceiling in lb/ton =
9.39E-07
Total MCEM deposition on the C-Channels in lb/ton =
2.19E-06
Total Ceiling and C-Channel
3.13E-06
NOTE: SEE THE PICTURE ON THE NEXT PAGE
Mcemdep1.xls, Ceiling
-------
Page 1 of 1
Pv^TXJt^ &F- (n*ID£" TTt
C<="iu^ pbVl£"
X Be*>rvv\
fiIe://P:\S517.002\REPORT\980779 8.JPG
3/23/99
-------
APPENDIX E
FIELD DATA
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
Plant:—rs
Dato:
Sampling Location: r^mi h^\
Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple:
Iraki* of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Lsnoth): / K"
Stack I.D.: a ^ "
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance 6):
inches / Stack I.D. » dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A):
inches / Stack I.D. » dd
Calculated By: .VwV.s>\.
Traverse
Point
Number
Fraction
of
Length
Length
(inches)
Product of
Columns 2 & 3
(To nearest 1/8")
Nipple
Length
(inches)
Traverse Point
Location
(Sum of Col. 4 & 5)
J3V
3. 11
/
U tt
s a
o>
t ft
/ S"
Hf"
3
si t
/9 * 9
fei—
J L
lop >J
TTT
Schematic of
Sampling Location
111
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Plant: _ Date:. lo
Sampling Location: TTfi gxhnm*-/- K.pfSrEr. Clock Time:_£l£lL
Run#: Operators: A?l.£c^s
Barometric Pressure, in. Ho:^pr^v ^c\3 Static Pressure, in. hUO: ~~*S
Moisture, %: 1 % Molecular wt., Dry:_2Si§B_ PitotTube, Cd: Q.^V
Stack Dimension, In. Diameter or Side 1: Side 2: 9^.5*
Wet Bulb, °F: • Dry Bulb.°F: '
Tmaraa
Point
Numbar
VMuUl?
In. M^O ™
Stack
Tamp.
°F
4/
"2.
3
-v
€> 1
•r
z
c?
3
J 5°
C )
z
o-
3
-)cr
b /
CVO
fS
rf
3
rn°
J5F -
Ta —
Md - (0.44 X XCOj) + (O.KxXOj) + (0.28 X%t^)
Md - (0.44 X ) + (0.32 X } + (0.25 X )
Md -
* KLO * H-0
Ma « Mdx(1 - —-2-) + 18 ( )
Ma - ( ) x (1 ¦
Ma -
15- °F-
100
¦ ) + 18 (¦
100
°R (°F + 400)
p*"Pb+-S?r"(
19.B
) +
13.6
P»-
#.
In. Hg
V» - 85,48 x Cp x >IEF x
f£
x Ma
V»- 85.48 x(
Va -
As- It
Q» «»V» x Aa x 60 «/m
)X(
)X
{-
ft/a
2
Qb-
Qa -
x80
•efm
Pa
*H,0
Qa ..-Q»x 17.847x —— x (1 - —)
¦» T« 100
«td
Q««td-
X 17.647 x-
dadm
x(1
100
-------
Plant b
Sampling Location .
Run Number: /t3i J"-/ Dale: /o-os-'ii?
Pretest Leak Rale: 0 00°' cfcn @ In. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: ^ Orsat: ^}a
FIELD DATA SHEET
_ Sample Type: 2>^ Operator: V*.
X'ucV- Pbar: 3Q ¦ 3o Pi: - -7.0
C02: o 02:
GL I
Nozzle IDUh>) Thermocouple #: KT" <0
Assumed Bws: A Filter #: ,00 cis *pf. 3(J£><7
Meter Box #: Y: /, 00' AH®: j. >"3
07^
m. ^ T>
! . V/~>
1.^
VP
dSi
^ 51
4 s
< <¦<•-»
5
OTV*
0 60
i io
/. XL,
/.«(*
=>-5^
9S
35
3
e>-7^5
• "lOlS.WlO
l.tfo
l.*7
I.f7
cP5i
0 "ba
1 . »n
0 - uo
ya
s) -5 f
'/V
3 s"
3S
3r\
£cO .00
1. nb
J.
A. >3
J-S 3
J"5 (
3">
¦>
j. ^3
J.}-*,
y/
c>«3
^•5V
*6
3 -7
3S
5
3
o
J. a •»
j.zS
'//
^4J
¦5^1
1U,
3-1
3 5
¦s-
C>
ff 1 <3 . oe>t»
/. -io
J. 35
cJ-35
«P5J
44
3 F
3y
5"
sn
oO*
'S
1 ¦ C>
,?. 3 ?
^.37
J? /
*/*
•?
S? 1 ^ (ar>
/. ?£>
«3. "S(
J. T?l
5V
=>5 1
A 11
*/n
3 "5
5
fc *
C.G
e>S4*i
ffj\.*30
/¦ «o
J. -3 T>
^.-33
5«V
<55<3
bf
e/o
3 G,
S
«5«S4
«JiS 1t>o
1 .So
(.«;«
l.«n^
5^
J6!
•/s
90
3 O
5
~>v
£>*I < j?
gJl4.cV5
1. 5/^
1 .°i->
1 •'itf
5/
>•53
.^5-5^
f-5
Vo
3 7
*
cxv.
1 . *¦?
/
t.%o
/
S<7
J 50
J5.J
S*
(o
<5"0
<5^ *
H°-1
V*
5
-
las
ICb^
K4&. 600
1 .50
1
1
955
1*
1*
5
no
100¦i*
SSI. am
1 .
1 .qH
1 *4
sss.
J5
9
i
1011
te.3. IMS
l.JO
1 ¦* fo
|.5fo
1/1
aS3
<3 5 I
SO
J3
H*
S
AVm-
vfip-
AH-
T5-
Tm«
-------
H
(?
Page
ot
Plant Name:
Run Number:
Ca- rtV-
^ 1
Test Date:
Operator:
I o — •S — ^ ^
. VV<^V"z-<=>cJw.i-W
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling / QockTinie
Time, / (24-hour
(min.) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
Velocity
llead^P,)
iiLlhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
(All) in.ll20
Stack
Temp. • F
m
Probe
Temp. / Filter
Temp* F
Impinger
Temp.
• F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
In.Ilg
Inlet
(T5.ta)*F
(Juliet
(^mil) °F
Desired
Actual
I *>6 ' ttx±
SCc-^ OOi>
1 JO
/ .SCo
/ .5
l. 3c^
l.Co*
l-(V&
(o~)
^5 V ^-5 e
*/-?
5 5-
¦s I
<,
/5-i" 1 Id®
J? "Vfj.'SOO
l ¦
/.««
/•$*,
d>s a j ^
5 t
5- (
-5"
3>
/&>o !
>? 7 8. 3 7c?
1 . JO
1.56
1 • S'S
JSI ' ^
48
/OS 1 vl*,\
g&t. 3t=^
1 • SO
1 -4-5
I-S4
Ce>0>
JSI
4*
S
•S
no ! n3i
i. ->f9
J.J1
C>£
A5 3. ' r9*5?5
LI*f
Co (
5 &
s
/7*5 1 111 3
887.o=ic>
1 ,"70
J.J*
,5.J \
lcz>
'-2-SJ
3
5«
¦s
. /86 '
/.JC5
..S*
/ «aS3.
6/S
^35 3 ' -25/
(a
s-s
5"
/'
VS
¦T
>>-
JOQ 1 n-±\
S02.3ID
/• iC5
1 .uo
%
JS'
Ls>
' .ziQ.
<^C)C. .oO
1 ¦ <£>
i .
/ .
JL®©' -P5j
is-
IX
1 nVb
| - iC
l A«
9 .ot>
C.-7
'
£
,3/5 ' /3V4
1 Itl .ooo
J - IO
.1*,
.3.1^0
r_-7
JSJ>I j£\
x^u
^l6o
c
553 1 S€ "b
7g
s
/
/
/
I
§&-
5" "i © .oo 5
-------
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Sample Recovery Data
Plant: C^u^y ^ Run No.:
Date: /o - s - qs Job No.:
Sample Location: t,,^. v
Sample Type: 5 Filter No.: /Qg/?/> >
Sample Recovery Person: b. \VA-^)->
n.2
3
A?7~
N\\
3.5C .S»
3SO. ~7
<£. /
4
56-
V7Co ¦ Co
t.fSSI ~ ~
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Volume
M315-1
Run Start
781.150
Run End
942.000 •
Leak Check 1 Start
821.830-
Leak Check 1 End
822.500
Leak Check 2 Start
856.170-
Leak Check 2 End
856.200
Volume Metered
159.115-
^ 0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
890.255
Leak Check 3 End
891.29'
Impinger/XAD H20
Init Tare Final
Net H20 Gain
392.2 '
373.4
• -18.8
(29.2)
394.7 "
405.8-
• 11.1
17.3-
326.8 '
330.7'
3.9
6.1 <
476.6'
496'
' 19.4
30.2 •
0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
Condensate Collected:
15.6
24.3 '
iff
-------
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP
M315-1
meter temp tm
R
Ap
\p1tt
AH
Ts
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
A-1
1.4 '
1.183
1.92 -
43 '
50
-
51
-
1.4 •
1.183
1.96 •
42 '
51
<-
50
1.4 '
1.183
1.86 '
42 -
38^
35
1.4 "
1.183
1.87-
40 '
36
35
*
2
1.8 '
1.342
x&m
42' „
38
<
35
*
1.7 •
1.304
2.23'
4T ^ 37
-
34
1.7 '
1.304
2.23'
41 *
37
-
35
1.7 •
1.304
2.23*
41 "
37
35
3
1.8 "
1.342
2.35'
45'
38
34
1.8*
1.342
2.3^7
49 -
39
*
35
1.8'
1.342
2.31 '
54 '
40
-
35
1.8'
1.342
*51 /.>>54-
40
fT
36
B-1
1.5 •
1.225
1.95*
54'
40
r
36
1.5 *
1.225
1.95 '
54"
40
*
37
1.4 "
1.183
1.84*
5
50
*
46
1.4 *
1.183
1.84'
54 $1
50
*
48
2
1.4'
1.183
1.8-
59 '
45
r
45
1.4'
1.183
1.8-
59"
45
45
1.4'
1.183
1.83 '
55'
48
y
46
1.4'
1.183
1.79 "
66 -
48
47
3
1.5"
1.225
1.94 *
61 -
48
~
48
1.5"
1.225
1.94-
62-
50
-
48
1.7 *
1.304
2.19 '
65'
52
49
1.6'
1.265
2.06-
65"
52
*
49
C-1
1.2'
1.095
1.55 '
64 -
52
49
1.2*
1.095
1.56"
64-'
53
49
1.2 *
1.095
1#tu
67"
54
52
1.2 •
1.095
1.54'
72-
55
51
2
1.3 *
1.140
1.69-
63'
53
-
52
1.3-
1.140
1.68 -
67'
52
S
51
1.2 -
1.095
1.55 -
6V
51
51
1.2'
1.095
1.5^
55
-
53
3
1.2"
1.095
"Bef-
59
53
1.7 "
1.304
2.23 -
65 -
61
-
58
1.7'
1.304
2.21 '
70'
62
-
58
1.7'
1.304
2.21 '
70 '
62
-
58
D-1
1.2 '
1.095
1.58 '
65-
62
59
1.2
1.095
1.58"
65 *
62
58
1.2"
1.095
1.58 -
65 *
62
58
1.2'
1.095
1.6 -
68 '
62
-
58
2
1.1
1.049
1.48 '
67 "
78
72
1.1
1.049
2"
67 '
78
/
73
1.1 1
1.049
2 '
67 J
78
76
1.1 *
1.049
2 '
67 '
78
--
77
3
1.5
1.225
2.5 -
66 '
78
77
1.5 '
1.225
3.5 "
66'
78
77
1.5
1.225
3.5 '
66 '
78
77
1.1 '
1.049
0.000
3.5 '
66 *
78
78
0 000 / S
Average AP 1.1892' 2.01
59
52.7'
1.4141
\Data\M315 xls, bd a
-------
£
i cfm @ $ in. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: Pitot: Orsat: _±^/9
'LZ2
».v*
AVm-
^fip»
AH«
Tin*
Travaraa
Point
Number
Sampling
Tlma
(mln)
Clock Tlma
(24-hour
doc*)
Gu Mater
Rending
(Vmjft3
Velocity
Head (Ap)
in H20
Orifc* n«s«ur« DiftorvntMl
(AH) in H20
Stack
Tamp.
(Ts)
Tvmparabir*
°F
Impingar
T*mp.
°F
Dry Gas Malar Tamp.
Pump
Vacuum
f«.Hg)
Inlet
(Tmln°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Oasircd | Actual
Prob* FHtar
ft 1
O
07/V
<94 3.4 la
y////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
5
Oil')
9*4 Vo/
J.bo **
/.k3j?
^<3
zsi
-
*/
l*>
om>\
95^.3"30
/.Jl
'¦}->
$¦ 3
~)15J
V<7
34
3 '
zo
OT5")
-7*3
t - Jo
I . Leb
1. Cf Cs>
.T/
JO
c>S-*
v s=i
^6.8. o^e>
1 . 3 O
1. (a ®i
<72
J5T,
i?<"3
3«"
3 ^
O'i&'l
97/. V5C.
1. 3 o
I G>
/ Co "7
SI
JS I
J>5^
9
\ • -IO
3
<9 -1\
17
?7
•5 "7
f
(n*
OS*
. ^ £
/ . 1")
h>~>
**
5^
3 "7
4/
no
Olo I
1 o) %
1 ¦ d%
<95 3
92
3F
3-7
75
.
!.;)•&
l.i%
H<\
3*»
3"S
cJ
c>1 IX
-
«/ r
3^
V
C*37
k=>cH.1tS 7
/ ve>
/. 7
/. 7<^
0,1
o>S-3
V7
V/
V
45
OWS
p»
' CC? A-* O
/. 4 a
/-
/• 7?
S3
rJS 3
/
V?
%>
^ /
*
I
/co
©15>C7
fDia. *•/£?
1 . VO
/ , . Cf&O
i. HO
1.17
1 ¦ *7*7
351
»/ 7
V3
i 10
1060
ie>l<* S
1. 40
1.74
5%
34 3
V"7
V3
4r
>
lit
to IO
Ibai. c,5c?
1. ffh
1 .7^
A.VS.
If
V3
y
r *
Ha
1017
I CO-?. 34
». 7^?
5*1
;5j
yt
vy ..
yj
iK
IOSJ2
inin.Tld
.16
i.ai
i. at
,")S5
^53
flu
HI
3. SWO
M
/.at/
1-3^
dsa
^Cp
HH
Is
V
-------
Plant Name:
Run Number:
Page
of
1 f lalo.iA'^ b
/M.3/S '3
Test Date:
Operator:
to —- I -Z-A cA* t. L.
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling / Oock Time
Time, / (24-hour
(min.) / dock)
Gas Meter
Reading
Velocity
llead^P,)
in. IhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
(All) in. II20
Stack
Temp. • F
m
Probe
Temp./ Filter
Temp* F
Imptnger
Temp.
• F
Dry Oas Meter Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
ln.Ilg
Inlet
(T5.ta)#F
Uullct
Desired
Actual
/?,5 1
/ 0 3*5-570
• sy
/. iCo
/• Jt,
•S 9
' c?s v
* °7
*4
y s
l 1 101*1
c,sr>
,°f2
i. o>
liCo
5^
1 5 5/
"V<7
V 5
l*S ' llf?S
/a// l.'icc
/.oo
/.J?
/.A*
65
7 «J5«>
^/50 / ulo
i .oc>
/. J 2
/JJ
63
^6-3 7J5|
V9
*/*
•y
«S5 ' iiiu
/Yo
1 .JO
l-SI
i .54
g> a
^5-S
V "7
5
1 (eO ! / /<3 1
/D5/. '/JO
1. \o
i .q
n0 1 i v 3 s
it^S? ,7C>o
i.tO
/ .8/
( .St
1
'«>55
^ 5P
' i <^.cn
louo.* 3o
l MO
f.$t
1 -¦*(
to-*.
^<3 'J5 3
5"!
St
V s-
y
b i
i «c> ' / /
1 .«a
1 .S«3
0>l
JSA ' cP5o?
Si
MA
V?
i«5 ' ;/ . 10
1 . 1 Co
/. 1 ([
5o
V
iso ' IIC^
/0T 2 -ooo
/.J I
1 ..3 I
Co 3.
3* ^ ' JS 1
50
5 3
5"^?
1 '<3 to
/e>TS .010
/. a v
,. av
6>3
Jao
5(D
-5" 3
3*5
•y
J
*>00 1 1
l077.Se*-?
. 13
i .Ji
i ¦ }\
Cb^
c?5t ' 3S(
5o
5" 3
jos 1 izm
Ib-SO.^OC?
s ^
/
i.^
1.1
o«c J-So
5o
5T£>
/./S
/. /*
(c>.
®
/ . ")£?
1.7c
C,<
e>52
5(
s?
S-5
*»S / i30*
tO'Xl.LSC)
1-3(7
1 •
1 .Co°l
<^S
1 ^So
fo
S 8
<>3c> / i 3 v
I0^7.W
[,30
l.GA
i.C,cl
JS3 ' ^
J-J
55
a3S / /3/S
I.IO
I.C/&
l.(„^
J-5S ' J^O
GO
5*
/ /v,,.
1 iM.i-SS
i .3o
I.C.-Z
I -Cet
7 5-
' Ho
-5t
C? o
's «
/
, fcv"*
|(. 3^. ' . .
/
/oeCs-o
^ . o <= r
3^1.
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant- plc^\ Run No.: i**
Date: ,o -o*v tw 5v\„v<-. o<^
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Volume
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP)
Run Start
Run End
M315-2
943.492'
1104.385'
Leak Check 1 Start
Leak Check 1 End
986.265'
986.285'
Leak Check 2 Start
Leak Check 2 End
1027.325'
1027.345'
Volume Metered
160.833
0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
Leak Check 3 End
1066'
1066.02'
Impinger/XAD H2C)
Init Tare
Final
Net H2Q Ga
575.2 '
657.1 '
509'
825.1 '
0
0
548'
671.3'
512'
852.2
0
0
Condensate Collected:
-27.2'
14.2'
3'
27.1"
0
0
17.1
0.4656953
1.55556
Pt
M315-2
meter temp trr
Ap
A-1
B-1
1 -
0.98 v
0.98'
0.98
1.3'
1.3'
1.3'
1.3"
1.3
1.3'
1.8'
1.7'
0.98'
0.99'
0.99'
0.99'
2/
C-1
D-1
/
0.95'
0.98'
0.98'
0.98'
V
1'
1.2'
1.1'
1.4*
1.4"
1.4'
1.4"
0.9'
0.93'
0.93'
0.93"
0.94'
0.9'
1"
1.3'
1.3'
1.3-
1.3'.
1.3
/
AH
Ts
Inlet Outlet
1.36"
42'
50 '
50
1.27-
41 '
33 '
32
p
1.27
41'
34"
31
1.27'
42'
35'
34
1.66'
51'
35"
34
1.69'
43'
35 "
34
1.68^
45'
35-
34
1.69"
42^
35-
32
1.67'
51"
37 "
36
-
1.67'
5l'
37 '
36
2.31'
51'
37'
36
2.21/
45'
37"
37
-
1.27'
48'
37"
37
1.28'
48'
38"
37
1.28'
49/
39-
38
•
1.28 /
49'
39'
38
1.55'
54'
38-
38
65/
41 -
40
58'
42-
41
*
1.8'
57"
43-
42
1.77'
66'
43'
42
<-
1.79/
58'
43 -
43
"
1.79'
59'
44"
43
1.79'
59'
44'
42-
1.21'
62/
44 "
43-
1.26"
58'
44"
43-
•
1.26"
58 '
44 '
43'
1.26'
58-
44 "
43"
¦
1.28'
63'
48'
46'
1.28*
63'
48'
47'
1.54'
62 '
48"
47"
1.42"
60 -
49'
47'
1.78'
o>
00
49'
48'
0
1.81'
61 "
50'
48'
1.81"
63 "
51"
48-
1.82'
61-
52"
48'
1.16"
63 "
50"
48"
1.21'
62 °
53"
52"
1.21'
62'
53'
53'
1.21"
62 "
53"
53"
1.22'
64"
54"
53'
1.18'
61"
55-
53'
1.3'
65"
56'
55"
*
1.7'
65 -
58"
55'
1.69'
65 "
58'
54'
1.69"
65 "
58"
55"
*
1.68'
72-
60"
58"
1.68'
72 "
eo'
58""
---
\J>
Average ,\P 1.53
57
44.5
\Data\M 315-2S7 xls, bd a
-------
N
o
Plant PU^c b
FIELD DATA SHEET
31 "5 Operator: bi>H
Sampling Location i ynrvgj fctAwsf t) Operator:
Pbar: 3Q.Y 5 ps: • 7, J
C02: p 02: 3lQ.^
Nozzle ID:(rL'l jyaThermocouple#: fi.T-6?
Probe Length/Type
Stack Diameter;
VP®: V ' IfAoZb Pitot #:
• As:
K." I .T>Ob " 7
,3k
Assumed Bws: / Filter #: lOtpoi^ "7
Meter Box#: Ruft-S Y: /«6t>i AH@: I, &3Q
Post-Test Leak Rate: . oc/5 cfm @ ^ in. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: Phot: ~^'Orsat: vf*
Traverse
Fofrit
Number
Samp log
Tbne
(mln)
Clock Tim
(24-hour
dock)
Gas Meter
Readmg
(Vm) II3
Velocity
Head(Ap)
in H20
Orilos Pressure Differential
(AH) in H20
Stack
Temp.
(T«)
Temperafcire
°F
impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
fin. Hg)
Inlet
(Tm in°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Desired | Actual
Probe Ftfter
A 1
O
CK.1L
/0
/. 3D
I, 3<>
? 7
-'5 J
^5>
V-
3~?
J
/£>
0<»f 7
lll.ll "5
/. ^
f.^o
? 7
JS*
^<2
3-*
/S
(%>S O
// 4 .oVO
'• 9
r. "i
^7
J53
J-s 3
V/
3 1
V
m.mc>
/^>
1. "^o
3"?
J5J
rW?
H
0"?©-»>
f*+~> iv>
/ -o
/- 3o
/- 3o
3?
C*S*
f/
Jl
3 7
*
*-!OS
/.
91.
rOS ">
V
**
3^
£>-»/«
/ .
/ .So)
v*-
ri«i
*
>c.
~
3
O "7 iO
13c - 7 ?e>
/. 40
/.«0
f.*X
ox
1<»
35
*5
/»
/.
c. ?
I.AT~>
^a^>-
3*
^C>
50
'3 -> <; t 2
/.
*.<*«
t.w
*S
+*
3*
3*
55
mi. 5 3
fx.
J-*
3 -»
^6 I
(dO
0-75T
/H-7. 7*5
t <*r>
t ?&
Jiia.
A5--5
*<
3 J
65
0*1^
tSO.(*-74
.<\S
2TO
J 5*3
<3-
J5
3^>
c>«t <*-
nilrt*
l.tL
1.
1-7
J'&J
3^ /
4
tio
1.
SO
<>3*
/
4*
3 "J
3«"
V
o>
&
©6S 1
t SI, OOc?
.A5
l.*l
/.
So
«»tf J
4?
37
ft.*
V
s-s
1 . IO
/.^3
iK
^4-3
/J
36?
30
V
m
/(*<>. OHO
i^tO
IA*>
kS
151
X-53
3C-
35
3
/oo
Dl>S t
nlO'O
1 • Itf
l.w
H4-
V5
3°t
3-?
y
fOS
£>iSL
iVW.'UO
( .^O
47
JS 3
Vi
4b
3t
y
J/0
n2\
i.io
I .«!
l I
&o
.a*}
HO
*>7
w
< 1
ito
I00\
l£1. **(„:>
I .-irt
1 -M
til
*« A
It -.
^ 7
*
1 r) S
ioiH
1 o.
I •
SI
*/*
V*
*
/aO
16 l\
iSU.eK
. "l6!.
v- iA
*i i
''S
HS
V*
V
fe5
AVm-
vfip-
AH»
Tm«
-------
Plant Name:
Run Number:
\S - "?>
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling / Clock Thne
Time, / (24-hour
(min.) / dock)
Gas Meter
Reading
C1UIH
Velocity
lleadtP,)
in. IhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
(All) in. II20
Stack
Temp. • F
C5>
Probe
Temp. / Filter
Temp* F
Impinger
Temp.
• F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
In. I Ig
Inlet
0»in)* F
Uullct
ft~„) °F
Desired
Actual
/35 / /O^^l
/17-33 I
i-3
.3.5 S 7 -?5J
'/*»
97
V7
jT
-5
/tO 7 /03«
JOO. 3M>
.1*
/.a *
/•i8
S7
JSi 'JS5
v-7
<^8
/VS ! /oVo
Jo5.*>»e>
'-r3
,.££
r-SS
Co 1
J-5 1 JSi.
4i
Vf
/So 7 1 vcc?
JOCo oi8"»
i.10
/.
so
*s>
V S1
r
/5?5 7 Ht>%
"3'fe.e.eiO
.
5
5
/C£> 7 nio
,3 U.-7 70
1 .©
i <**i
f- ^
(o>
->sa ^rr i
5"0
s-o
y*>
£•
t(* 5 7 i uS
/i If/) . O^O
..-5
1 • t<> "if
K-T577
U>?>
JS*1 ->3t
^t>
5-3^
J-Q
s
/7D / uai
u"b
,, • 'C»*
1^' ¦ Ti C B
V. fo"»p
1 l
So
5"i
S 1
s
/ 7^5 / l[tt~
M.Ht
1 .Co "7
\.io~7
5"0
5"V
5"
*-
v) .
/Sb 7 »/<#i
pikiuAl'' ^3
1. *
l-W
7 ¦$
f
r*
s
/XS 7 */*^>
^3.
5^
56,
^vo / ^
,S\ci
1*IP
i.M-i
->54 ' a*I
S \
£ "l
.5
l».l '<:;>/*/!
)
/
C C
¦Plfavf f)W
¦v
1
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant- ? Vo-^V ^ Run No.: "£>
* 5sn~c>oj
Date: ID -o -^8 Sample Box No.: 1 Job No.: /crm^^ " ^ <¦- ¦
Sample l oration- TiwveV £LkUo.qsV —_
Sample Type- M 3/6. Filter No.: = ^a"
Sample Recovery Person: . VX^l-z^r A^U ___—_
Comments: 5A^c^ ^eV r «s foo ^c, <>^
IH. 3
3
M"\
MT
Sci^.-y
2.Z
4
SA\CC~. &c. > / jr- ^ ^
A.T ^tJc
2(2-
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Volume
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP)
Run Start
Run End
M315-3
104.562
266.819-
•»
Leak Check 1 Start
Leak Check 1 End
147.735-
147.765
Leak Check 2 Start
Leak Check 2 End
187.762
187.787'
Volume Metered
162.172
0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
Leak Check 3 End
226.903 "
226.933 "'
Impinger/XAD H20
Init Tare
Final
Net 1120 Ga
594.2- 575.2
674.5 ^ 688.8
509.4 ** 511.6
799.7- 825.4
0 0
0 0
Condensate Collected:
-19
14.3
2.2
25.7
0
0
23.2
0.62569608
1.55556
M315-3
meter temp tnr
Pt
,\p
AH
Ts
Inlet
Outlet
A-1
1 '
1.3 ~
37'
30
•""37
1 -
1.3-
37'
30
" 37
1 "
1.3-
37"
32
" 37
1 -
1.3-
37"
32
- 37
2
1 "
1.3"
37 "
32
37
1.4 -
1.82 ^
42-
34
—' 34
1.4-
1.82-
42"
36
- 36
1.4 -
1.82 "
42-
36
-35
3
1.4"
1.82 ~
45-
35
-36
1.5-
1.94 -
45 "
z34
-^34
1.5
1.93-
46^
^33
1.4 ^
1.8 -
46-
>-> 32
B-1
0.98
1.25-
50"
33
- 33
0.9 "
1.16-
47"
35
-34
0.93
1.2"
50-
37
- 35
0.93^
1.2-
50-
37
- 35
2
1.1 ""
1.43 -
45"
36
-¦ 36
1.1*-
1.43 -
45-
36
•-"'35
1.1 "
1.43-
45"
36
35
1.1 "
1.43-
45-
39
35
3
1.4"
1.82
47~
40
^ 36
1.4^
1.82 n
47"
40
•- 36
1.4 -
1.81 ^
50*
40
" 37
1.3 ^
1.69-
49-
40
"" 37
C-1
0.99 "7
1.29 -
51-
45
^44
0.99
1.29"
51-
45
44
0.99 "
1.29 -
53 -
47
- 47
0.98 "
1.28 ^
57 '
49
oo
\
2
1.2 "
1.55 -
61 "
49
- 48
1.1-
1.42
63 -
48
- 48
0.92 -
1.19 J
62-
50
- 50
1 -
1.29 "*
62 -
50
-"49
3
1.3r
1.68 -
63 -
52
- 50
1.3"
1.68 -
63-
52
- 51
1.3"
1.67 J
67-
54
'<&
1.3^
1.65 "
73"
53
- 50
D-1
1 -
1.29 J
74^
60
- 58
0.95-
1.22"
74 -
60
-> 58
1 -
1.3 '
65-
56
-58
1.1 ~
1.44"
62 -
57
-56
2
1.1-
1.44 '
62-
57
- 56
\2T
1.57-
62 -
57
" 56
1.2 '
1.56 J
64-
57
- 56
1.2-
1.57-
64-
59
- 56
3
1.2"
1.57 -
64 '
59
' 56
1.2""
1.56 ~
68-
59
- 56
1.2"
1.56 a
68-
59
- 56
1.1"
1.43 '
68-"
59
" 58
Average AP1'"
1.50
54
44.2
2l3>
\Data\M315-3&8 xls, bd a
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
7
/^UpKsAl ?WVr ^
Sampling Location \ OAAgn
Run Number: ai 315- fg/pate
Sample Type
lr^Wi_^oc+ Pbar: _^0
/fr-O?-^ C02:
.P»:.
02:
Operator:
Cl>
Nozzle ID: , / Thermocouple #: &T"
ffv-
/. 8 3£
Pretest Leak Rate: cftn @ /^"in. Hg. Probe Length/Type: ^ '/S-jo^SS Pilot #: BP-Cy Post-Test Leak Rate: c^fefm @_£jin. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: PjtotiAJ//^ Orsal: Stack Diameter: AsPost-Test Leak Check: Pilot: ^-Orsal: /LyW
jo .c,
Assumed Bws: / Filter #: /$&/]
Meter Box #: AMB-ft'. i.OQl &H@:
**k
Traveree
Pofat
Number
Sampling
Time
(mini
Ck>cfc Tim*
(24-hour
dock)
Goj Meter
Readuig
(Vm) ft'
Velocity
Head (Ap)
in H20
Orilce P»e#eure DifterenbeJ
(AH) in H20
Stack
Temp.
(Ts)
Tempera hire
° F
impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
Inlet
(Tm in°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Desired | Actual
Probe Fitter
A /
r>
N\SH
Jtlc ZrJS
yzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz/zzzzzz/zzz,
/S
cJG 7.C-70
iO|a
^|4
r„o
jSO
Sc~j
(O
\
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
Plant: ^
Date: \& ) *9
Sampling Location: TIE "r xhoosl-
inslde of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple: c3 'S A?
Inside of Naar Wall to Outsida of Nippla (Nippla Langth): I Vff
Stack I.D.: <3^ Vz
Distance Downstream from Row Disturbance (Distance B):
inchas / Stack I.D. = dd
Distance Upstream from Row Disturbance (Distance A):
•inche" / Stack I D" «* Schematic of
Calculated By: Sampling Location
Traverse
Point
Number
Fraction
of
Length
Length
(Inches)
Product of
Columns 2 & 3
(To nearest 1/8")
Nipple
Length
(inches)
Traverse Point
Location
(Sum of Col. 4 & 5)
/
Q.0S3
,(&>
z
O *9.^)
223,5
•5 .*575
,(35
'1.5
o.tn
I.HJ5"
0,^4
53,5
^."72
l,i^
5
0,1^
l'<&5
iq.55
(o
0.^17
a 1.5^
aim
1 \X"
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Plant: _
Date:
]h
Sampling Location: "Tte £xhau<-f
Run #: rnft.- \
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg: go.a. Static Pressure, in. I-UO; ~ ~h, 5
Clock Time: I QSS
Operators: . finIS
Moisture, %: Q^a^J_22_ ^Secular wt., DryPitot Tube, Cd: O
Stack Dimension, in. Diameter or Side 1: S3.5'' Side 2: 5''
Wet Bulb, °F: Dry Bulb.°F:
Yaoj
f£°
ae
-r
o'
~r
)H°
/r
0°
o
Traversa
Point
Numbar
ValocKy
Haad
In. HjO
Stack
Tamp.
°F
A I
z
1 v£0
.3
1 • Gb
3
I
V^O
C3
z.
V.S5
ci.
'h
\>Co
£>Z
CLV
CL £
C3L
3
Q> Q.
^ i
1.9^
£>3
1 .HO
Q> a
I tHO
£3.
Ta - tV
- - Ctkjh^&r C'lccirto/^
Md - (0.44 X%CO^) + (0.32 X%0^) + (0.28 X%Nfe)
Md - (0.44 x ) + (0.32 X ) + (0.28 x )
Md- 28.9i
% H-0 % H-0
Ma - Md x (1 -=-) + 18 (—-£_)
x 100 100
Ms - () x (1 - ) + 18 (¦
100
100
Ma-
T5-
Pa - Pb +
Pa-
V5p -
'F-
°R (°F + 480)
S.P.
13.8
) +
13.8
In. Hg
Va - 85.48 x Cp x ^P x
J Ta(°H)
Y PaxMa
Va - 85.48 x ( )x( ®'®4 )x^
Va- ^0.\ 8 ft/«
Aa- 3.9^ ft2
Qa - Va x Aa x 00 a/m
Qa - To.l6 x 3.83^ x60
Qa - acfm
Pa *H,0
Qa . Qa x 17.647 x x (1 - — )
atd Ta 100
ol
°Vtd"
Qa#td-
X 17.847 X-
dacfm
x(1
100
8 IS:
-------
N
t
Sampling Location T"TF £y hau^-k
Run Number: C Date:
Pretest Leak Rate: QOcQl cftn @ 1^) in. Hg
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot:\j_ Orsat: A/j f\
FIELD DATASHEET
1,5
Sample Type:
Pbar: 3qSO
C02: Q
Ps:
02:
Tort U^K4
Operator:
Probe Length/Type: 3 Pltot #:
Stack Diameter: ffi6*o0,5
Nozzle ID: fy 3l Thermocouple #: £5 ) 0340^
Assumed Filter #: fOQW^ - 0| q<+
Meter Box #: \1 Y: g^QSAH®: U?
Pos£ffcst Leak Rate: elm @ [5 in. ^9-
Post-Test Leak Check: Pilot: ^ Orsal:
Tamparatura
uocfc Tlma
(24-houf
dock)
GaaMatar
Raadvig
(Vm) lla
Valoaty
HMd (Ap)
In H20
Ortlca ftaaaura Differential
(AH) in H20
rnpngar
Dry Gas Meter Tamp
Sampling
Ounal
VAcuum
Daslrad
Actual
Proba
(Tm In r)
(tn. Hg)
(Tmoul F)
Z.ZjC
TSrot
fy-lj
%
.7 5.30
2235
1
-------
N
CP
Plant Name:
Run Number:
Test Date:
Operator:
Page <=1 of Q.
IQlsJSl-
ML
Traverse
Point
Number
EE
Sampling
Time,
(min)
ng I
LL
QockTinie
(24-hour
clock)
Lai.
ISO
77ST)
Oas Meter
^Reading
7?r. 3
222
I
Velocity
id^P.)
IhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
(all) in. II20
Desired
UG\
ii£3_
Actual
TL
Stack
Temp. • F
m
AL
£0
~?o3~
Probe
Temp. / Filter
Temp." F
its. '2M3
Impinger
Temp.
• F
22
%
Dry Oas Meter Temp.
Inlet
Uullcl
CEnu.)^
2L
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
51
_k£.
w
Hi
&o_
5L.
i
Ho
7 g i /iO
60
UHj,W?
_£C_
14-g
1)3
tx±
TT
~x
-1
) 50
-739.0*
£3l
11? 'W
^'tks
£2l
GQ
L2*.
I20
VH&
&£l
A±
JL
2L
l&o.
*333,
itf
zi_SS22£S
SJ-
s:
l€S
'?Q
135
g
115
2£L
<£7
l2
2D.
&Z-
& 7
<0^
&
£3l
i2
70
JS±
«l5.
€» G?
<-3
£
a
a.
no
*8«.;
¦3.
J£2Q_
IW
4?-
IS
-SH.
25
J3£.
£
SE
&."?•
ass'-m
ss.
7D
iS.
a
SOQ.
so .70
SH:
Ii3i.
1£.
^<5
jiS-
-3^.
^5-
as_
2KL
5i3?,30
iiiL
^a.-as
121.
Q.O
a ft
.Zi.
o(. )
la
3ft I '256
as) 'at
£9"
3f
JCL
~&3:
L-5.
qj?>
3£l
yaffia
32H
-20.
£01
h^_
QJZ-
X
3SL
521
22_
oL.
C&T
w
¦^r
Sam
33,y> ^10
tyoo
^>gl
- ^1
3r/^i
£t(&
Oi.
SHh'dut
ft
35
7V
'O
:^w
~?o
5^
77
32
73
%
Si
2
-------
M7 PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919)941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
u
Plant:
Date:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
I
/o
/?M
Sample Recovery Data
"T"T~£ EvUmrrf
rnlLS.
Sample Recovery Person: A f-L
Comments:
Run No.: (Tl 6 ~ ^
Job No.: 511 - oo?—
Filter No.: ) Oo)- q | q ^
o A- pa QLr^
FRONT HALF
Acetone A / 1 n Liquia
Container Nor \\/ j Level Marked:
(0-n 3, f 'H -rt
Liquid
Sealed:
Filter
Container No.: ! OO I cj<^ " Q )
Sealed:
/ o o ¦ t> y
Description of Filter: Lte
Samples Stored and Locked: -
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
-CO
Liquid Level Marked:
Sealed:
•2A*\
Description of Impinger Catch:
Cf&Z
Impinger
Number
Contents
Initial
Volume (ml)
Weight (gf dust
Initial
Final
Net a*
1
0>L
^OOho I
2
Qi LUJcit&L.
ioav,
tHi,?
';5a.3
1(9.0
3
F/vT7V
3^3.1
3
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Volume
M315-6 -
Run Start
685.191*
Run End
¦854.030-
Leak Check 1 Start
729.003
**
Leak Check 1 End
729.268'
Leak Check 2 Start
770.503 <
Leak Check 2 End
770.550'
Volume Metered
168.463
0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
816.51-
Leak Check 3 End
816.574
Impinger/XAD H20 InitTare Final
399.7'
441.9'
363.9"
529.2"
0
0
379.2
452.2'
367.3-
551.3 *
0
0
Condensate Collected:
Net H20 Gain
(319)
-20.5
10.3
3.4
22.1
0
0
15.3
0.644644 23.8
42 g
27 dwt
1.55556
. \Data\M315.xls, bd B
-------
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP
M315-6
Meter tm
R
Ap
AP1"
AH
Ts
Inlet
Outlet
D-1
1.3 '
1.140
1.9 '
39 "
29
-
29
1.35 "
1.162
1.95 "
41 "
34
~
31
2
1.35 "
1.162
1.97'
43 '
35
-
31
1.3 *
1.140
1.9 ~
44'
35
>
32
3
1.6 -
1.265
2.34-
43 ~
36
-
32
1.6-
1.265
2.34 "
43"
36
-
33
4
1.6 '
1.265
2.35 "
38 "
36
/
33
1.6 -
1.265
2.4 -
43-
37
34
5
1.6"
1.265
2.4"
46 -
38
-
35
1.6"
1.265
2.4 "
42-
36
39
6
1.75-r
1.323
2.4-
46 "
39
r
36
1.7 '
1.304
2.3-
CO
*
38
*
36
C-1
1.25"
1.118
1.83-
46 "
41
39
1.2-
1.095
1.7"*
00
*
44
*
39
2
1.2 '
1.095
1.7"
50 -
46
*
40
1.35 T
1.162
1.9-
50 -
46
'
41
3
1.4 '
1.183
1.95"^
X
CO
48
-
43
1.35 ~
1.162
1.9 "
57-
50
-
44
4
1.45-
1.204
2 t
61 «*
53
46
1.45 ~
1.204
2 '
65 "
54
+
48
5
1.45"
1.204
2'
64'
55
f
49
1.5-
1.225
2.1 "
62 °
56
+
51
6
1.7-
1.304
2.5"
66 '
58
>
52
1.7' ¦
1.304
2.5-
63 '
58
+
53
B-1
1.2 -
1.095
1.7
61 -
57
m
54
1.2 -
1.095
1.7 '
60 '
59
*
55
2
1.3-
1.140
2 '
63-
60
<
56
1.3 "
1.140
2-
68 '
60
-
56
3
1.3^*
1.140
2 '
65'
62
-
58
1.3 "
1.140
2 '
69"
63
*
60
4
1.2 -
1.095
1.7 "
70 *
66
A
61
1.4 •
1.183
2 -
66"
65
62
5
1.45 -
1.204
2 -
74"
67
e
63
1.5 "
1.225
2.1 '
70 -
68
*
65
6
1.75 "
1.323
2.5 -
67-
70
/
65
1.7 -
1.304
2.4 -
70 -
70
66
A-1
1.2 '
1.095
1.7 '
68 -
68
y
66
1.2 -
1.095
1.7"
69 -
68
#
67
2
1.35 '
1.162
1.94 "
67 -
70
68
1.4 -
1.183
2 -
76 -
72
>
69
3
1.4"
1.183
2 -
73 "
72
M
70
1.4*
1.183
2 "
74-
71
*
69
4
1.5 -
1.225
2.1 "
76"
72
*
70
1.5-
1.225
2.1 "
77 '
72
f
69
5
1.55 -
1.245
2.2 "
71 '
70
/
69
1.55"
1.245
2.2 "
74 '
72
/
70
6
1.55"
1.245
2.2 "
77 '
73
70
1.60
1.265
0.000
0.000
2.34'
74 -
77
s
73
Average AP1/:
1.1983
2.07
60,
53.7
1.4359
\Data\M315 xls, bd B
-------
N
V
Plant:
Sampling
T )F h)4ft'<%? /0/^l>7^
Meter Box #: 1 1 Y:Q/g(fl AH®: ),«?4 '
Post-Test Leak RateQCb^ cfm @ in. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: PilotNj Orsat: t/J^\
Traveree
Point
Number
Sampling
Time
Nn|
Clock Time
(24-houf
dock)
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm) fl3
Velocity
Head (Ap)
in H20
OrlRoe Pressure Differential
(AH) in K20
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp.
(Ts)
Temperature
°F
Probe
Rtter
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Tm in°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
y/////////^////////////////////;y////////^^
o
ol
Q3i2£l
l .J
m.
ttSL
s
/ £
sf
ii
M32:
PHI
1^5L
iil
tAfi
wjr
1QZH
iiS_
1x33,
TrTT
^ul2_
tL
HZ
UZ-
Qh-'
)x>39
is;
/yfi.SQ
1A-
aa
h*S
JU_
kL
n=-
t
222.
12jD-
^53-'
Ja
&
?a.
i
5/
•fe* Sto-n
AVm-
vSp=
AH*
Tmj
*3
iL
-------
N
^ Plant Name:
Run Number:
q^.9?
Test Date:
Operator:
Page <3. of <9^
f\FL
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling /
Time, /
fe"in-) I
Clock Time
(24-hour
dock)
Oas Meier
Reading
3mm
Velocity
I lead $P,)
IilIIiO
TT
Orifice Pres. Differential
(All) In. ll,0
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp. * F
m
Probe
Temp. / Filter
Temp* F
2
3S"
Impinger
Temp.
• F
Dry Oas Meter Temp.
Inlet
lEikllE.
umici—
$
SL
Pump
Vacuum
»n.ilg
I
m.
53
|4o
l05o
3
6X^6
JO.
W"
fS^
£1.
3.
as:
oC
GO
W5 '0%
5^7 'W>
.2.
JL
\S,o
S/-
JL
no
^•*6
JiS.
y,67
•2'Q
_£Z
s:
£Z£.
Mi
IMs
TS
i^z.
^«o
HZ"
£1.
7
W-Q 'gttr
&
-2J-
-i
A
iS5
iapo
),•*/%
Ii4.
a_g^3Kz
5o
l <=% o
*a
ii&
iO
AiCZ-
SI
i
<35&.
5ii
-S3.
^ z&o
^S.
foO
12-
Z3!
j5j£.
±L
_llq_
iogo^
\oZftl
idiL§gj
175
^,0
e:
i_
SV': 'fig/
'3^/
avi obi
'2
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
PLANT
DATE
Run No. f
Sample Box No. c-}. Job No. jSiioo&
SAMPLE LOCATION
TRAIN PREPARER
i "7 S)—- Ytij'S ~h Filter No. 1 v JO
SAMPLE RECOVERY PERSON
COMMENTS
m
OrQ
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.
Filter
Container No.
3,^-1- •
fi //A. L^uld
c(Sf-. rj Level Marked
Sealed
17A
Sealed
XI
Description of Filter
Samples Stored and Locked
ifljOGL
-Ui
PC 1 (hik?.
BACK HALF/MOISTURE ^
Container No. J
yYTil^-^f- BH-1^
Liquid Level Marked Sealed
IMP. NO.
CONTENTS
INITIAL VOL
(ml)
WEIGHT (grams)
INITIAL
FINAL
NET
1
1
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Volume
M315-7
Run Start
862.757
Run End
1031.798
Leak Check 1 Start
907.758
**
Leak Check 1 End
907.826
Leak Check 2 Start
949.132
Leak Check 2 End
949.179'
Volume Metered
168.879
0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
989.492 -
Leak Check 3 End
989.539-
Impinger/XAD H2Q
InitTare Final
Net H20 G
624.1 '
687.8 '
568.7 '
766.6 '
0
0
597.81
698.5'
568.7'
794.4'
0
0
Condensate Collected:
-26.3
10.7'
0'
27.8
0
0
12.2
0.324754
42 g
27 dwt
1.55556
18.98
2.2. C
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP)
M315-7
Meter tm
Pt
Ap
AH
Ts
Inlet
Outlet
D-1
1.3 '•
1.7-
42 -
30-
30-
1.4 '
1.8-
43 -
29'
28--
2
1.3'
2'
42
32-
29"
1.25'
2-
42'
34'
31'
3
1.3'
2'
42-
34-
30-
1.3'
2-
43'
36-
32'
4
1.3'
2'
44'
36-
32'
1.35'
2'
48-
38"
33'
5
1.4"
2.2'
46-
36'
32'
1.4"
2.2'
48-
38-
33'
6
1.55'
2.3'
48'
38-
34'
1.5'
2.3'
49-
40'
35'
C-1
1.1'
1.6>
47'
36'
35"
1.1'
1.6-
51'
40
37'
2
1.1'
1.8-
46"
40'
36-
1.1'
1.8-
54'
43'
CO
CO
\
3
1.2'
1.9'
57'
44'
40-
1.2'
1.8-
64-
45'
44'
4
1.25-
2 '
58'
47"
45"
1.2'
1.8 "
61'
48'
44"
5
1.3'
2 '
57'
47-
45-"
1.3"
2 '
61 '
48"
44"
6
1.5'
2.3'
60'
48-
45*-
1.4"
2.2 '
60'
47'
45"
B-1
1.2-
1.8 '
58'
48'
47-*
1.15"
1.8-
60'
51/
47'
2
1.2 -
1.8"
59-
51-
48 '
1.2'
1.8'
64"
53'
49"
3
1.2-
1.8'
60-
54'
so-
1.2'
1.8'
62'
52'
so"
4
1.25-
1.9'
65'
54-
51'
1.2'
1.8'
64'
53-
SO''
5
1.3"
2 '
62'
54-
51'
1.3'
2 '
63'
54'
51"
51 '
6
1.3'
2 '
63'
54'
1.45--
2.2 "
63 ^
56-
54'
A-1
1 '
1.4'
69 '
56'
55 /
1 "
1.4 '
67 '
57'
56'
2
1.05-
1.45 '
68'
57'
56;
56
1.05'
1.45 '
69
59-
3
1.3-
2 '
62'
58"
57 '
1.3 '
2 '
62'
59'
57<
4
1.3'
2 '
68'
62-
59'
1.35 -
2 '
64'
64^
60 y
5
1.35-
2 -
69'
64-
59 '
1.35'
2 '
70'
64'
61'
6l"
6
1.4"
2.2 '
71'
66'
1.4 -
2.2 "
71 '
65^
61'
Average AP1/:
1.92
58
46.8
.\Pdtd\M915-2&7.AI&. UU
-------
N
rJ
r
Plank
FIELD DATA SHEET
cv..> ri?u,jt-p Sample Type: iqwator:
tf
-P.fi
' — •- - '-] '/ v_ J ' V —v. I.-W 1 J
Sampling Location -fT^F^hcaaT
Run Number: /WS]5> Date: J £)/7/^*4
Pretest Leak Hate: Q.1)^ / cftn @ J_Q In. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: PitotNj Orsat: A/->^
Pbar ZCj.T^ Ps:
CO=: O±_02:2SZ^
o,fS?
Nozzle ID: m. Thermocouple #:£S~ /
ins Assumed BwsQ.Oj Filter #: /Ooff*?. -06
Mater Box #: IT" vO.'imwT^
Probe Length/Type: f) Pilot #: i^y- / Post-Test Leak Rate:Qflojfffftm @ j£)in. Hg.
Stack Diameter:As: frf-1 Post-Test Leak Check: PitofT^—J Orsat:(Vjfl
Traveraa
Pbht
Number
Sampling
Tim*
(mln)
O C(&
Oocfc Time
(24-hour
dock)
Gu Meter
Readng
(Vmjft3
Velocity
Head (Ap)
in H20
Orilcm Pressure Differential
(AH) in H20
W//////M
Stack
Tamp.
(Ts)
Tamparatura
°F
Proba
Rttar
Im pin gar
Tamp.
°F
Dry Gu Malar Tamp.
Inlet
(Tm in°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
o
?Cll
Ml
flJKI
1
m
£m
Lia.
4/1
T\i?
42.
1 f-'J
^ o
3£X
33^
Q_
3d.
^3-
3s
*L
j3
35
1
j£.
jfL
i>2-
u
liX
it
-li
45.
o~7o
2*2
o
Mi
4®
±
i*3L
^4
fc±
1A
^70
4^-
1
JL2.
0 7°'
25
07/3
5C? ,7 7
1+15-
i./s
Ji4£l
1*
i
J±3L
OSL
2j^o
2S,
if
25L
_22L
710
4-4-
Lia
jm
3S
£
4p_
5
T
50
TTT
if
5 10
07V/
g7?fe
£
&
SE
j>gj
:2_
J_J5_
Y
hi
i
2_fe
-£1
i^3_
77 tP
J.*
Ssa
ft J, 17
25SZ
i, it
Tzi
•V/y/
ff
-3^3.
4
21.
WJL
hi
o3.
3S
37
/0,. 13
EST
?
LLi
Jjz
£
4^2-
iiii
li3-
I, /T
JO.
3S:
25£
te.
3i_
Ms
3i
3£
3±L
5!i.
SHU
UJ-
-U3-
Ai
SS
Ji21
A31
5St
-3^.
HI
3S-
V3-
-ib^2-
J3J_
11
n-
~W
W
I
M.
QH6
m
^L
.1^-
35-
32.
3_2_
331
&
JUx
iii
i:
z
^JZ.
5ft/
AVm-
vfip»
AH»
Ti-
TS-
-------
M
-V
Plant Name:
Run Number:
?j^Jb
I'age Q. of Q-
Test Date:
Operator:
/
Pump
Vacuum
In.II8
Sampling
Time
(min.)
Qock Time
(24-hour
clock)
Orifice Pics. Differential
(All) in. ll20
Slack
Temp. • F
(X)
Impinger
Gas Meter
Reading
Probe
Temp. / Filler
Temp.® F
Dry Gas
Traverse
Point
Number
Velocity
I lead (P.)
HLfhO
Meier Temp
QuITcl
Deiircd
Actual
w,ct
loTB
s
Si
t&'Sto
S&5 '3/2
/3.6,7a
9H! '3*3
)3^iO
i
2
KKJirLHi
Q&h 'Que,
Ot&Qm
n zoo
552^4
ISMb
-------
RLE RECOVERY DATA
Run No, MVS
17 ycfc sample Box No.:_sL_ Job No.: l7P°^
Sample location- ) I ^ _ —
Sample Typa- 15 Filter No.: 10° 109^ do
Sample Recovery Person: rxPL
Comments:
^CTlo sp,/tf -5/ljco^cyJ
FRONT HALF T) 5 - 5? - T H
Acetone Uquid . \ ,
Container No.? / n^3Q<~. |_evel MarkedSealed:
Filter
Container No • ft// £4 Sealed*. \J
Description of Filter: "Sour*,, foo^ yracj-. eclair.
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:. "JV'W
Liquid Level Marked*^ Sealed:
IMP. NO.
CONTENTS
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
WEIGHT farams\
INITIAL
FINAL
NET
1
JOO
^£,1
590./
2
OlL,Efe^
}oo
-s./
3
Snpfl/
o
<35r
^76
r^1,o
l.f
4
llJLqfey
Cj< j L-j
27.o
5
6
TOTAL
27. J
Description of Impinger Catch: Cx&brJA
-------
Isokinetic Sampling Data Reduction Spreadsheet
TTE Exhaust
HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT D - BARRE, MASSACHUSETTS
Metered Sample Vol
ume
M315-8
Run Start
31.881 •
Run End
192.679'
Leak Check 1 Start
Leak Check 1 End
72.262-
73.333 •
Leak Check 2 Start
Leak Check 2 End
111.594
111.678'
«•
1
Volume Metered
159.567
0.000
0.000
Leak Check 3 Start
Leak Check 3 End
150.509/"
150.585-
Impinger/XAD 1120
Init Tare Final
Net H20 Ci;
586.1"
642.4'
567.6-
887.4-'
0
0
590.1
634.3"
569"
914.4'
Condensate Collected:
4
-8.1
1.4
27
0
0
24.3
0.681722
42 g
27 dwt
1.55556
37.8
Effluent Gas Velocity Head, (AP)
M315-8
Meter tm
Pt
Ap
AH
Ts
Inlet
Outlet
D-1
0.9 —
1.3 -
36 "
33
•- 33
0£^
/i.3 -
42-
34
" 33
2
>1.7~
37-
35
- 33
1.8"
43-
37
•" 33
3
1.15 ^
1.8 -
41"
37
- 34
1.15 ^
1.9 "
42"
38
y34
4
1.15"
1.8 "
42 ^
37
34
1.1
1.8-
43-
37
^37
5
1.2-
2.1 ~
46-
38
-"35
1.15 -
1.7 "
48-
37
/* 34
6
1.15 -
1.9 "
45 -
36
^ 35
1.2-
2.1 -
50 -
37
" 34
C-1
0.9 "
1.3 -
44-
36
36
0.88 ~
1.3 -
44"
38
- 36
2
0.83-
1.3 "
47-
37
' 34
0.8 -
1.3^
48'
38
^ 35
3
0.91 -
1.3-
54'
40
' 37
0.88 "
1.3-
50 "
41
37
4
0.9 -
1.3-
48"
38
' 37
0.87-
1.3-
48'
39
"" 37
5
0.93-
1.35"
52"
39
' 37
0.87-
1.3 "
49-
39
*" 36
6
1.1 ""
1.7-
53"
40
' 38
1.1 ^
1.7^
50"
44
42
B-1
0.95-
1.4-
51 -
48
46
0.95"
1.5-
55-
49
- 46
2
0.9 '
1.3"
56-
51
- 47
0.9 "
1.3"
56-
51
- 47
3
0.95'
1.5 -
61 "
51
^ 48
0.95"
1.5 ^
64 -
52
- 49
4
1.1 -
1.8-
66 -
54
" 52
1.05-
1.7 "
68-
55
- 53
5
1.1 '
1.8 ~
70-
56
- 53
1.1 "
1.8 ^
67-
57
-54
6
1.3-
2 ^
67-
57
- 55
1.3"
2 *
66-
57
^ 56
A-1
1.1~-
1.8 '
63-
57
-- 56
1.1-
1.8"
66 -
57
<- 57
2
1.1-
1.8*
66 ^
59
—' 57
1.1-
1.8 '
67-
59
<¦ 57
3
1.2-
2.1
72J
60
" 59
1.3 ~
2-
63"
59
^ 58
4
1.3-
2 '
62-
60
" 58
1.3-
2-
67-
61
58
5
1.3-
2-
63-
59
59
1.3-
2'
74-
60
~ 59
6
1.3^
2-
67-
59
-------
Plant
Sampling Location T) £- £>Jo<3i>S^
Run Number: M^/S-EfcSLDate: 7*3^
Pretest Leak Rate:Q£))5 cfrn @ _j^ In. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: f\jj~f\OnaA:
FIELD DATA SHEET
FP-Z-
Sample Type: S ) ^ Operator:
Pbar ^Q. IhTt W ~
CQ2: O 02: ~ _ _____
Probe Length/Type: ^Cj/gto-- Pilot f :-£lW Post-Test Leak RaleQ,Q5 cfm @/5 in. Ha.
Stack Diameter: As: Post-Test Leak Check: Pilot: k/f* Orsal:
o,/s?
Nozzle ID: G-L Thermocouple #: £."S~ ) ,
Assumed Bws£)poj Filler #: j O0( ^• 2 J'Q,
Meter Box #: /5" Y: /,CP>i AH®:
Traversa
Point
Numbar
SampRng
Tlma
(mln)
dock Tlma
(24-hour
dock)
Ga« Mat*/
RaacSng
(Vm) ll3
Valocjty
Haad (Ap)
In H20
Oriloa PraMura Dfflaranbal
(AH) in H20
Stack
Tamp.
fT»)
Tamparatura
°F
knpingar
Tamp.
°F
Dry Gas Malar Tamp.
Pump
Vacuum
On. Hg)
Inlat
{Tm ln°F)
Oudat
{Tm out°F)
DaaJrad Actual
Proba | Fitar
\5)&
yzzzz/y//zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz/zz/z//zzzzzzzzzzzzz/z//z/z/zzzy
)5/^
njti
1/iQ
m
5*6
a$o
^53
«>
§C7.*>2S
]
7o
2tt7
2.4°!
/
\ '
\Z
z47
AV—< ' Ss/"'
Qp/fT^
is
\y
~70
i-V?
a?
54
AVm- v£p- AH- T5» Tm-
-------
f°
v/J
tASTi AN l< F. SIARCH CROUP. INC.
Eastern Research Group
Sample Chain of Custody
PES Filters
Filter Pre-Weights:
Filter Sample ID:
Weigh 1 (10/01/98)
(Approx. 9:00 AM)
Weigh 2 (10/01/98)
(Approx. 3:00 PM)
Avg. weight of
filter (g)
Abs. Diff.
of Weigh 1-Weigh2
Constant
Weight
Avg. weigl
of filters
100198-01
0.3403
0.3402
0.3403
0.0001
YES
0.3403
100198-02
0.3361
0.3361
0.3361
0.0000
YES
0.3361
100198-03
0.3387
0.3385
0.3386
0.0002
YES
0.3386
100198-04
0.3362
0.3362
0.3362
0.0000
YES
0.3362
100198-05
0.3408
0.3409
0.3409
0.0001
YES
0.3409
100198-06
0.3389
0.3390
0.3390
0.0001
YES
0.3390
100198-07
0.3390
0.3391
0.3391
0.0001
YES
0.3391
100198-08
0.3377
0.3378
0.3378
0.0001
YES
0.3378
100198-09
0.3362
0.3363
0.3363
0.0001
YES
0.3363
100198-10
0.3384
0.3384
0.3384
0.0000
YES
0.3384
Dl Water Blank
176.4277
176.4278
176.4278
0.0001
YES
Relinquished by:
Date:
Received by:
Date:
-------
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Sample Chain of Custody Record
PLANT: Asphalt Plant
RECOVERY PERSON
PROJECT NO.: S6
SAMPLERS:
*^VU
4 ad
Sample
Identification
Sample
Description
Number of
Containers
Analytical Request
PM Analysis
MCEM Analysis
Transfer
Documentation
Comments
Method 315 Filter ^ Tr< t) /TP\
5
Jerfc / / 0/k/**//
_
M315-1-F
Method 315 Front Half Acetone rinse cseo
O rv«-
yes
yes
¦a
M315-1-FH-A
yes
yes
M315-1-FH-M
Method 315 Front Half MeCI rinse (j&o
yes
it
M315-1-BH-W
"7
Z
Method 315 Back Half & BH Water rinse (fco*\\
Ovs-e
yes
M315-1-BH-S
Method 315 Back Half Solvent rinse /^0
yes
v:
TtaAtO lO/kk-V
M315-2-F
z'
Method 315 Filter
TDrse-
yes
yes
_Z_
iso'
M315-2-FH-A
Method 315 Front Half Acetone rinse f scjO v*.\ ^
yes
yes
;OV«J0
T
~ZL
M315-2-FH-M
Method 315 Front Half MeCI rinse /6bc>
yes
C \. ooel
M315-2-BH-W
Method 315 Back Half & BH Water rinse (scomx
Method 315 Back Half Solvent rinse {JS«
yes
z:
M315-2-BH-S
yes
Method 315 Filter -•*>
T
M315-3-F
a ise.
jes_
yes
2
~C"A*C> lojTf'iS
M315-3-FH-A
Method 315 Front Half Acetone rinse tx-r^ ^.v N
yes
yes
M315-3-FH-M
Method 315 Front Half MeCI rinse f sop
5
aA
yes
2
M315-3-BH-W
Method 315 Back Half & BH Water rinsefgoO^.
yes
M315-3-BH-S
Method 315 Back Half Solvent rinse f Six> nA.
o*a
yes
HJH5-4-F X
zzz.
Mettwd 315 Filter
Meth6fr315 Front Half Acetonejinse
X yes
\
yes
M3lg^cFH-^;r
Method 315 FftmUHalf M&efnnse
X
^es
yfcy
yes X,
M315-4-^<-M"
M315-^H-'W"
M31&4-BH-S
Method 315 BacfcHafffrflU Water rinse
Method 31>BSck Half Sotvenfrtase t
"^r
V
yes
«z
X yes
V»e»
3:
M3tS,5-F ^
Method 315 Filter
X
5H~
M 31A
Methoa~31g Front Half AcetonajinsT
Method 315 Front Halt-MeCI rinse
s:
-es
M315-5-FHPM,
yes
M315-fr
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL 9ERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Sample Chain of Custody Record
PLANT: Asphalt Plant O
RECOVERY PERSON:
PROJECT NO.: SS17.002
SAMPLERS: /flF/
Sample
Identification
Sample
Description
Number of
Containers
Analytical Request
PM Analysis
MCEM Analysii
Transfer
Documentation
Comments
rk f8>r/i'rul8?tO-BH-S
/
Relinquishedby:
"SSSWE,
Link K)^
Date
p/li/1>
custody.xls
-------
N
vo
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Sample Chain of Custody Record
PLANT: Asphalt Plant D
RECOVERY PERSON:
PROJECT NO.: S617.0
SAMPLERS:
Sample
Identification
Sample
Description
Number of
Containers
Analytical Request
PM Analysis
MCEM Analysis
Transfer
Documentation
Comments
Method 315 Filter
M315-FB1-F
yes
yes
M315-FB1-FH-A
Method 315 Front Half Acetone rinse
Qfted Li/ ftCcv
bnli
Date
Time
•f'-fZ-
Custody
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVWE8, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Sample Chain of Custody Record
PLANT: Asphalt Plant D
RECOVERY PERSON:
PROJECT NO.: S617.002 „
SAMPLERS:
Analytical Request
Sample
Identification
Sample
Description
Number of
Containers
Transfer
Comments
PM Analysis
MCEM Analysis
Documentation
Ceiling Plate
Ceiling Plate
Celling Plate
Ceiling Plate
Ceiling Plate
Pi6 M<=>~r Cal.\.€Ct CPk
wing Plate
755
CPBIank
Celling Plate Blank
Ceiling Beam
Ceiling Beam
Ceiling Beam
Ceiling Beam
Ceiling Beam
Ceiling Beam
t>lP CJ>LL£Vr
Ceiling nMm
Ceiling Beam Blank
BEBIank
Elbow Bend (one side)
Efoow Bend (three sides)
Elbow Bend Blank
El Blank
Elbow Bend (one side)
Elbow Bend (three sides)
Elbow Bend Blank
E2Blank
£
Relinquished bv:
Data
8
neiwMahad by; K
custody jds
-------
APPENDIX F
QA/QC DATA
I3>C*
-------
NOZZLE CALIBRATION SHEET
DATE: S-S -1& CALIBRATION BY:
Nozzle
Identification
Number
D1, in.
D2, in.
Dg, in.
AD, in.
o
1
&L -I
0-/8?
o-
o. /?? t
- o -
C>„
Where;
D1 2 3 ~ nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter, in.
Tolerance « measure within 0.001 in.
AD • maximum difference in any two measurements, in.
Tolerance ¦ 0.004 in.
Davg= average of D1, D2, Dg.
-------
NOZZLE CALIBRATION SHEET
nATF- K - re CALIBRATION BY: bbtt
Nozzle
identification
Number
D1, in.
D2, in.
Dg, in.
AD, in.
Davg
G"L- ~ A
. i&t
- tlo \
, iQO '
t
~OOJ
^/S°f
\
Where:
^12 3° nozz'e diameter measured on a different diameter, in.
Tolerance - measure within 0.001 in.
AD = maximum difference in any two measurements, in.
Tolerance = 0.004 in.
Davg= average of D1, D2, Dg.
-------
NOZZLE CALIBRATION SHEET
nATF- g -s ^ CALIBRATION BY:
Nozzle
Identification
Number
D1, in.
~2, in.
D g, in.
AD, in.
Davg
G-L- 3
. -
CD
Where:
g 3 = nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter, in.
Tolerance = measure within 0.001 in.
AD = maximum difference in any two measurements, in.
Tolerance = 0.004 in.
Davg= average of D1, D2, Dg.
-------
NOZZLE CALIBRATION SHEET
DATE: g-'S. -q* CALIBRATION BY:
Nozzle
Identification
D1, in.
D2. in.
D 3, in.
AD, in.
Davg
Number
« i&i
. IX7i
e /S""7
I
o
- \S~7
\
\
Where:
~l 2 3 ™ nozz,e dlameter measured on a different diameter, in.
Tolerance = measure within 0.001 in.
AD = maximum difference in any two measurements, in.
Tolerance = 0.004 in.
Davg= average of D1, D2, Dg.
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. £S - I Sensor Type _ Length
Ambient Temp. °F zl£ Barometric Pressure, "Hg 3£> • /<;
Reference Temp. Sensor: 2A
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
1
/fJO
o
y
2
/Q »v
72.
o
y
3
1
\
p /o
<=P / o
D
v
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
* Temp. Diff = iRef- Temp 4'0) - ( rest TfP' * 4601 x 100 * 1.5 V
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
-------
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Initial Dry Gas Meter Calibration Form (English Units) c\ o 0 " H v
Date:
ic
1-7*' Puar. in Hg Calibrator
Meter Box No.
fA~k
AH =
0.5
1 ^ ' Hv
V'/'r C
Dry Gas Meter
Trial
"Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(8F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
1
^,0
C ¦ , \
.'.TiC
1 7
77
7 7
17
11
7 7
2
<.c
k. i-S.
C'3 TfcC
'Z_, COc
7 7
11-
7?
11
7 S
7.V
3
\ /
* /
3
Cf <<( 3 3
C«t7.c^3
*3
'*4
^ 1
3 ?-
vz-
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
[.Vo>
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHtt
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
1
(in. H20)
r.e.
1
SCI.cv--
%O b,5cl u
7y
3
<*cb.T73
yosf.t
S
* •>
'i1
^ 2-
2
-------
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHa
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
Y
(in. H20)
1
'LA u
lc\
11
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
2
Vi i.s<<
"-.C.'TZ.
1 "\
1 c(
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
3
•J/t .Z.T2.
1-111
n
7 ^
"7 "i
#DlV/0!
#DIV/0!
¦Wl
V
A
^ H.S (otf
V>-
*7
SI
sf
2
%%
51
Vi
3
-
C^'7,1 i!
bZis
°[C
s*
I i
^ s'
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
A111
t(cc^
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHtt
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
CF)
Y
(in. H20)
N.'
O
1
S 1 (r.'VlZ.
2.o, c Z.T-
7,! • °
i-67.TM
Ub.cSt
5. si.-s
nc
Ss
2
Cs'7 3 .Cif-
(^7 "S
qo
* o
ic
*\&
^ UH"!
l.cct \ , cl c, 3
\,^
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
2
I
¦S-iCr-Z-
s -
^ -
so
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
3
1
7~
S-
s ^
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0I
Calibration Results
AH
0.50
0.75
1.0
2.0
4.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
master.xls
*2-^4
AH,
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Meter Box Calibration Factor
Meter Box Reference Orifice Pressure
#DlV/0! '
#DlV/0]
/i
8/22/97
-------
1 of 1
£7 PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Posttest Dry Gas Meter Calibration Form (English Units)
Pretest Calibration Factor
System Vacuum Setting, (in Hg)
Reference Meter Correction Factor
Date: 10/12/98 Pi*,. in Hg
0.9802
3.5
1.0077
30.20 Calibrator: D. D. Holzschuh
Meter Box No. MB-11
AH =
2
Dry Gas Meter MB-11
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
Final, Outlet
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft1)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
1
10
202.206
209.703
7.497
71
74
72.5
71
73
72
2
10
209.703
217.134
7.431
74
76
75
72
73
72.5
3
10
217.134
224.633
7.499
76
78
77
73
74
73.5
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHa
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
Y
(in. H20)
1
14.958
22.368
7.410
74
74
74
0.988
2.040
2
22.368
29.73
7.362
74
74
74
0.993
2.061
3
29.73
37.127
7.397
74
73
73.5
0 992
2.032
11 10128.xls
Printed: 12/15/98
-------
1 of 2
P PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
^ Initial bry Gasli/leter Calibration Fonrn
7^}.
Date:
Poar, in Hg
10/1/98
29.85
Calibrator DDH
Meter Box No.: RMB-15
Reference Meter Correction Factor 1.0077 (10/5/97)
AH =
0.5
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15
Trial
Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
(°F)
(°F)
CF)
CF)
CF)
1
5
730.932
732.982
2.050
72
72
72
72
72
72
2
5
732.982
735.020
2.038
72
73
72.5
72
72
72
3
5
735.020
737.058
2.038
73
73
73
72
73
72.5
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AH®
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
Y
(in. H20)
1
844.147
846.153
2.006
74
74
74
0.981
1.75
2
846.153
848.168
2.015
74
74
74
0.992
1.74
3
848.168
850.187
2.019
74
74
74
0.995
1.73
AH =
0.75
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15
Trial
Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
CF)
CF)
CF)
1
5
737.058
739.547
2.489
73
75
74
73
73
73
2
5
739.547
742.023
2.476
74
77
75.5
73
74
73.5
3
5
742.023
744.495
2.472
76
78
77
74
74
74
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHe
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
Y
(in. H20)
1
850.187
852.653
2.466
74
74
74
0.996
1.74
2
852.653
855.109
2.456
74
74
74
0.999
1.75
3
855.109
857.530
2.421
74
74
74
0.988
1.80
AH =
1.0
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15
Trial
Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
(°F)
CF)
CF)
1
5
744.495
747.314
2.819
77
80
78.5
74
75
74.5
2
5
747.314
750.143
2.829
79
81
80
75
76
75.5
3
5
750.153
752.971
2.818
80
82
81
76
77
76.5
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHC
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
Y
(in. H20)
1
857.53
860.327
2.797
74
74
74
1.002
1.79
2
860.327
863.120
2.793
74
74
74
0.999
1.79
3
863.120
865.899
2.779
74
74
74
1.000
1.81
15 10137
Printed: 10/2/98
-------
2 of 2
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919)941-0234
AH =
2.0
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15
Trial
Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
(°F)
CF)
(°F)
CF)
CF)
1
5
752.971
756.800
3.829
81
84
82.5
77
78
77.5
2
5
756.800
760.694
3.894
83
85
84
78
78
78
3
5
760.694
764.523
3.829
84
86
85
78
79
78.5
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AH0
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
y
(in. HzO)
1
865.899
869.679
3.780
74
74
74
1.001
1.95
2
869.679
873.482
3.803
74
74
74
0.992
1.93
3
873.482
877.283
3.801
74
74
74
1.010
1.93
AH =
4.0
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15
Trial
Gas Volume
Meter Temperatures
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inlet
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
inal, Outle
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
(°F)
CF)
CF)
CF)
CF)
1
5
764.523
769.997
5.474
92
94
93
85
85
85
2
5
769.997
775.385
5.388
93
97
95
87
87
87
3
5
775.385
780.990
5.605
92
94
93
85
85
85
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AHe
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
CF)
CF)
CF)
y
(in. HzO)
1
877.283
882.686
5.403
73
74
73.5
1.014
1.89
2
882.686
888.028
5.342
73
73
73
1.023
1.92
3
889.028
894.463
5.435
73
74
73.5
0.996
1.87
Calibration Results
" aH
y
AHe
Dry Gas Meter RMB-15 on 10/01/98
0.50
0.989
1.74
Meter Box Calibration Factor
1.001
0.75
0.994
1.76
Meter Box Reference Orifice Pressure
1.83
1.0
1.001
1.80
2.0
1.001
1.94
4.0
1.018
1.90
15 10137
Printed: 10/2/98
-------
O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Posttest Dry Gas Meter Calibration Form (English Units)
Pretest Calibration Factor
System Vacuum Setting, (in Hg)
Reference Meter Correction Factor
Date: 10/13/98 P^, in Hg
1.001
7
1.008
30.10 Calibrator
DDH
Meter Box No.
RMB-15
AH =
2
Dry Gas Meter
Duration
Initial
Final
Net
Initial, Inlet
Final, Inle
Avg. Inlet
Initial, Outlet
Final, Outlet
Avg. Outlet
Trial
(min)
(ft3)
(ft5)
m
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
1
7
283.996
289.263
5.267
68
68
68
67
67
67
2
7
289.263
294.547
5.284
68
70
69
67
67
67
3
7
294.547
299.823
5.276
71
72
71.5
68
68
68
Reference Meter
Meter Box
Reference
Gas Volume
Meter Temperature
Correction
Orifice Press
Initial
Final
Net
Initial
Final
Avg.
Factor
AH@
Trial
(ft3)
(ft3)
(ft3)
(°F)
(°F)
(°F)
y
(in. H20)
1
170.349
175.542
5.193
64
64
64
0.996
1.98
2
175.542
180.785
5.243
65
65
65
1.001
1.95
3
180.785
186.024
5.239
66
66
66
1.003
1.95
oo
r1
15 10137.xls
PostTestl 0-13-98
12/15/98
-------
9/30/94: C02-1
CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 2
Typa S Fttot Tuba impaction
#MMWMR9 cu wmIos.
ft.,,, . klMlMClltete
IMpW iWMPifWin fMmn w«
'-" '
Mftnumnga
Level end Perpendicular?
Vt"3
Obstruction?
/s)0
Damaged?
fi/'O
#, M0« * a, « +10*)
o
% (-10* S J, £ +10*1
1
ft, f*« % ft, £ +8*1
o
ft, t-8* sft, S +S*J
1
r
o
e
o
z - Atanr i* 0.128")
o
w - Alaf»0 U 0.0312S"I
o
D, (3/10* sD,i 3/8*)
Vs-
A
. V5V
Affi (1.06 £ P.®, £1.5)
OA/DC Gftac*
Complatanasi LaotbtBtv Accuracy Specifications RaasonaManass _
GWBCNM .
IcarttfythstthaTvoaSnftottutoa/probaP* lc"v ~ - ¦ imw or aitcaada an scarifications,
criteria and/or applicable design faaturas and i* hereby assigned a pltot tuba caferatkm factor C, of 0.84.
Certified by: ,U t>^v~ *7 -1^ ^
Personnel {Si0natura/Datat Taam Leader (Signatura/Data)
-------
9/30/94: CD2-1
CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 2
Type S Phot Tub* Inspection
Dagra* Mksdng tav*4 pmMIm tar
^wWngaiKitt
01 M* Pt
i«lMMkUaA
Qtwninn|«i
Laval and Perpendicular?
y^»<;
Obstruction?
Oo
Damaged?
af MO* s a, s +10*1
n>
ff, <-10*£«* £+10*)
I
ft, W* % ft, % +5*1
o
ft, «• « ft, s +5*1
r
I
e
I
z - Atanr 1*0.125")
.r>n<:
w - AtanO Is 04)3125")
0, {3/18* £ 0, s 3/8a)
3-V'
A
1 "aa "
A/20, (14)5 * xl.5)
/. 37
*-* _.«_i——j
ovwrih^I j mvi«
QA/QCCtmek
Completeness Legfettty Accuracy Specifications Reasonableness _
CartUeatiom
I certify that tha Typa S phot tuba/probe Df E.'S — J meets or exceeds al specifications,
criteria and/or appicablo deafen faaturaa and is hereby assigned a pttot tuba calwaUun factor C, of 0.84.
Cartifiadby: "^S) esvc*J-s>r— \^So^ir *A JH/L^
Paraonnel (Slgnoturo/Oata) Taam Laadar (Signatura/Data)
7 So
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. 'fc-T - ^ Sensor Type K -Tg- Length
Ambient Temp. °F ~i Barometric Pressure, "Hg o. c. v.
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
I -li-SV
1
ice
HJ.3
o
Y
( '
2
/*/v\£.
"7 T,
--.
M"
1jw%
4 •
3
Hto
T.io
"Z-\ O
o
*
1
y. .
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
V Temp. Dlff = <«ef. Temp * 460) - ( Test Temp. * 460) x 100 s 1S *
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
2S"(
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. Es - I Sensor Type k. -tc_ Length
Ambient Temp. °F ~i ^ Barometric Pressure, "Hg 3£> • /<;
Reference Temp. Sensor: ~2A
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
1
r <-<=¦
/fJO
3Jl
3A
o
y
2
/% iV
~U
o
y
3
\
p /o
0
v
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
% Temp. Diff = {Ref' Temp * 4*0) ' ' Test Tfwp' * 460) x 100 s 1.5 %
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. Dc.m- t & Sensor Type Length 1 °
Ambient Temp. °F 7_1 Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Reference Temp. Sensor: _
%
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
1
\Cv£
o
' (
2
Vv fl
If
7^
o
y
3
oic.
I \ o
1-
lJ
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
V Temp. Diff =¦
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
M^>" ^ f
Temperature Sensor No. pga\- oqT Sensor Type K- Tc Length 1
Ambient Temp. °F 1 Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
'i-i
i ce
Hyp
"5 ^
3*-
1
'<
bf-A\ O
"74
7T
toV
N
3
1.
2
2
2
3
1
2
% Temp. Diff = [Ref' TemP T 460) ~ ( TeSt Tf^- + 46Q) x 100 s 1.5 %
^ {Ref. Temp. + 460)
"2,^4
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
t>C,M -
- cf
Temperature Sensor No. tvAv^>- 1° Sensor Type
VC-Tc.
Length °
Ambient Temp. °F jLA Barometric Pressure, "Hg u=}e c. t
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
1
tC <£.
?>Z
34"
4 1
2
i
/V\R-
ICp
7 ^
o
it
3
Vt«-o
Z^>("
¦z^>S
1
«
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
* Temp. Diff - {Ref- Temp * 4f0) ' ' Temp. * 460) s %
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
-bse~
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
0C.M-O Of
Temperature Sensor No. Sensor Type Length I
Ambient Temp. °F 7 Barometric Pressure, "Hg Z.^ t Ql
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
VZo-iv
1
tC(£
l-Uo
3>i-
y
ji
2
trifi-
77
y
«r
3
1
(i°ic
Kco
'LoL,
o/S~Q
X
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
» Teap. Diff » (Bef- remp - 460) - ( Teat Temp. * 460) x 1Q0 s 1S t
(Ref. Temp. + 460)
2^
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. PGM - \ P
Ambient Temp. °F 7 ^
Sensor Type K~TC Length
I
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
Pi* -^ir
1
VCti
33
SjT
.4iDfc
N
u
2
to<«-
7t
o
V
<.r
3
"$oVC,
t-Vv/O
"2.1 O
1
U
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
% Temp. Diff = {R*f. Temp * 460) - ( Test Temp. + 460) x 1QQ % 15 %
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
_ (
Temperature Sensor No. Pc.u -oof Sensor Type k - tc • Length
Ambient Temp. °F Barometric Pressure, "Hg "Sa, z.*r"
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
T.tmth
Y/N
Calibrated
By
IC«=.
Mz=>
So
33
y
A>
. IBT
Y
Qoi'"
Ht-o
2
3
1
2
3
£
2
* Temp. Dlft - (fief. Temp * 460) - ( Test Temp. * 460) „ s ls
(.Ref. Tenp. + 460)
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. > - /
Ambient Temp. °F
Reference Temp. Sensor:
Vrocxi'S^>
Sensor Type i hec«aaeh.
RFL
2
rcr-
3^
z>x
c~)
flfL
3
6e> \\vaa
U^.V5 %
(Ref. Temp. + 460)
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No. "T-O Sensor Type Tk/j^MgW Length . A7"
Ambient Temp. °F (a 9 Barometric Pressure, "Hg m
Reference Temp. Sensor: (n ^
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
10- IH
I
j^r
O
/4FL
10-V
2
O
AfL
10-fy
3
o
aFi~
1
2
3
1
2
3
I
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
% Temp. Diif = {Re£' TemP * 4f°> ' ( TeBt Tf"P- - 46°) x 100 s x,s %
[Ref. Temp. + 460)
7_(aO
-------
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM
Temperature Sensor No.
Ambient Temp. °F C, °i
Reference Temp. Sensor:
-klL
Sensor Type Length /,j ^
Barometric Pressure, "Hg 3ft./O
Date
Ref.
Point
No.
Temp.
Source
Temp. °F
Temp.
Diff. %
Within
Limits
Y/N
Calibrated
By
Ref.
Sensor
Test
Sensor
10~\H
1
Aiv\b.
fn°l
(o<\
O
flfu
10- IH
2
Tcf-
3*
0
APu
m-m
3
ftoAvAG.
1 Llr.VP
c9U
o
L/
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
% Temp. Diff = {Ref- Temp * 4!0) " ( Te3t T*mp- + 460) x 100 * 1.5 %
* (Ref. Temp. + 460)
7U I
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
/ /£x6Aos /
frf* 3 / s~
flffi be»jv>j M>/zSi
/6r3r-'?&
1 of 2
Rom (
Quritty Control Cbaefc
QM
Mar to StBt afTati
Keqi til domed ilmwrosmiedatitimmmbly
AnomUBtiBBsiadatficsuiviiiJuuiau
Vbufly impact each tin for proper wammbify
Lewi odan mnanAer
/dn<^
C«kutatt|jiut»i iMi|iiliniMinfcim
D «u*— C . /#a )
VbatilymipaetlVpeSFltattDbe
Or^
Leak check each kg aflVp* ®
/. 0 0 /
/¦ £ 30
K A Jot t'M?
-------
Date
Page 2 of 2
Quality Control Cbeck
Obmnte
After Testing
Visnsi)y inspect sampibig nozzifi
Visually inspect Type SPftottnbe
)zst L -• L
Geoiogiaioisavariansindiidinginap
^ Ua rvv^, \ & m
Sample ran times ami data
d (7 d
DU
LLul). /
d ^ ^Sot^dJLj . 'Tu^y kej) / /Jk+db
0-rCtJ!\
~2. C? 3
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
~J O I
/fy*e j-Jiecf 3 / i
P1B> 4" 4. *0 X 6 to
Qutiftf Control Cbedt
Ofawntta
Mar to Stat afTem
Keep «fld—miftlMWtuwi«innrii train U,
Vbnfly impact aditniD for proper amibiy
G)
Lew4 ad asm oMMr
CalmiMu nupu i«niiin imrrlnina
«- ^ . /<£>? }
Vfanfly impact snpttasmaia for ddpi
Vterily impact l>poS Pilot tabs
CO
Lok cfaack och kg afiyps S Fftactobs
Lade check mum ¦¦inrfliij l»in
HZ) £M_«_
Dams Tans
g-iffirh"fitn n1 *»* ¦— j—fnmwmri
dm sheas
Y*
Unamd ocmutui ¦ iMiilfattalog
Property nwnanifaB rail and pfecbafnuaTtypB 5
*)M
T i ifc i Iiim \ ii Bill hnfhm mrt ¦ftmirir mm|iiwi
Miinieiii ilm |iniim ml HTtui iminmiiim
y**
V^^micew-rt-di.d«-iB1»«Bpinftr
y*
CalBanrion finms renewed fircaaptettnenaad
Data sheets reviewed by PM dafly daring testing
¦
3/5" ft) \3 ^ //
sj - , Igo-L-
4H ~ J. 9?
/f' /S c/« I" /. -J
/or-?8
1 of 2
yfo
AJ
-------
rw» /o
Page 2 of 2
Quality Control Cheek
After Testing
VhniiHr nnprff ——pifag nm.. i—
L62.
Vfrwlfr .^p^T^paSPftatliiliB
UA.
Leak check eadi kg of the TypeS Pltuimbc
I wlf flyjf <>»«¦«¦¦ wmpll1^
A.
Field Log
Project namedD and location
PAju^ O .fysi
Sampling pwiml
A//.*/*.* f />"-k u^L,
PLJfr
Mk
a?yt> p?"Q
/o -T-FS
Pa. + h c w/ft fc. ^ f/» 6 /Kr7£»-.
Description of QC samples
AJ //*
DflTiariumfiopQAPP
/toO
nifWi-nIrt— ™ .¦¦¦n.ling or Iimmul rjniltiiw
U
j^!ld/aim kj / tudi
Preservative required
-
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
I. Teat Run Observations
S m Recommended
M - Mandatory
Oct ST
199;
2.
3.
p*8« 1 of 5
/ Q~sS Ago J J-
Dace
1. Tfrain sec-qp ' filter ID
filter weight
filter checked fnrliolM"
filter centered
nozzle clean
nozzle •
nozzle diaaeter (jw-j
probe liner clean
probe marking! correct
probe heated along
entire- length-
impingerg- charged-
imoittgerg- iced-
iter- box leveled
pitot
ter*
orifice-
zeroed'
filter- box- or* holder- at* t
/or-?f
Test
Run
M-3'r
/aajqomt
AS /A
Teat
Run
¦Jf G>
-o/'
if//t
Test
Bun
3
/*
WW
v
ail bail joints Lightly
greased*
_*ll_ooenijg»- caupad'
aJM\ fijfa
initial- (R)-
LC-
VAC
Train leak check
at noszle:
(
H2O)
final- • positive- line* (W
on
(15
ter for
sec.)
negative- line* k
?
M—3 bag initial leak eheck (H)
Tedlar bag: Should hold 2 to 4 in- HjO
ores sore- for-10'minutes* or* •
flow meter reading on
continuous eva«^»ation- or*
Completely fin bag and let
stand overnight-^to deflation.
J%2L
¦Ml
MM-
tu/ti 1
.4
t#=
T"
•I
•r
t>h* I i^lft
/%. c Lys( eJ j AM*
^ A** ^ /j'
-------
R ¦ Recomended
M - Mandatory
M-3 sampling tram cheek:
initial- (M)
(should hold
10 in. vacuum final* (M)
for* i/2'xsin.)
2
Purge sample train with* stack- gas
*) M - ' A
Cons cant race- sampling
Time test ended
Q.bif* dtslpJrf
r port- iniciai
Dry gai
meter
volume:
fxnai
)• port- initiai
' final
fxnai
* fxnai
Train operation
during run
Nozzle changed
during run —
NOT- ALLOWED
piteh- and-yaw of-probe- o .fc
nozzle-not scraped- on- ninpie-
calculator constants or n
changed when TS and/or TM
changes- significantly
average time to set
isokenetics after probe
moved* to* next* point
< fbJui Oft
Average values:
impinger temperature
should- be < 70*F
<7*'f
* 25J<320*F,
"T- circie~oue
<2V2
barometric P taken* and* value
2MfJ
Post filter gas stri
Filter box tempera
was probe ever disconnected
from filter holder while in
stack?
/too
^<_o
was filter changed during run?
"Zco ! - -1 1
-------
o r
Page
1993
3 of 5
Dace
R " Recosnended
M - Mandatory
Check on filter holder loosening of
clamping device holder
was silica gel changed
during run?
/±£2L
Test
Sun
Vtzd.
Accurate
reading of;
was any particulate lose?
r PtkHkx
SjCJO
AH
meter
urn.
rature-
ana**
,2d/
Test
Run
M-3if
Test
Run
3
Test
Run
4
3
m
3Jl
stack temperature-
L?3naf- \ <~£'1 *'
•t
•I*
fob* ¥ t
meter* vacuosr
uaoinger- temperature
filter" box tenneratnre*
Minimum sample time of
Minimum sample volume of
ay/"it /?
us mat
dsef collected
8.
Post test: -• All' openings* sealed
- recover y_area; ciean~sheltered'
- filter handled-with- gloves-, forceps*
- petri- dish sealed, labeled'
- any samole lost-
water- measured*
grad cyl.
weighed
dL ' '
- silica gel weighed-, net* ems
- condition - coior-febuA'T^'-
¦T
spent-
- probe- cooled- sufficiently
- nozzle- brushes- clean
- wash bottles clean*
iLL* - blank
J Probe brusn
- water/solution ci"*"1
taken; acetone-, • water*.
Probe brusn- and extension ci»««-.
Samoie container:- Clean
fly...
-------
0 cf^T
Page 4 of 5
Data
R ¦ Reconmended
M " Mandatory
//>-s?y
Tfest
Pun
1
Teat
Run
Jf <*>
/tin-
Test
Run
3
Test
Run
4
9. PotC test Orsac Analysis of Initial (MJ
integrated bag sample Orsac
analyzer - Analyzer leak cheek
(levels should not £all below
cap. tubing and not more than
aL in bnrrette for 2- min-.)
Mil.
Final (H)
mL1
A>//b
jvJd.
ajM
III//)
Orsat- samples? Each bag analyzed 3- times-
if
I CO? agrees-vithin- Q-.2*-
I' Of agrees-vithin Q-.2X-
I CO- agrees- vithin- Q.2Z-
Analysis at end of test. Orsat analyzer
cheeked against air- (20;9-»• 0-.3)
* h I lib
JX
Orsat Analysis
F^range for- fnel
Orsar analysis- valid
Orsat solutions changed
when calculated F
exceeds fuel type- ranee
All ssanies locked uo
All sampling- components- clean- and" seaied
All data- sheets submitted to- observer-
mxrm
- Run- lsoxenetxc-
W?.
- Process* data
- -¦ Calibration sneets
7.6*)
-------
, 1993
Page
5 of 5
J. NOTES: Care should be taken, when sampling for organic compounds, Co
follow stringent quality control guidelines to avoid contamination of the
sample and sampling train. Take note of any occurences which could bias
the sample in any manner*
Include: (1) General comments; (2) Changes to pretest agreement with
justification; (3) Identify (manufacturer) and describe condition of
sampling equipment; (4) any abnormal occurrences during test program.
(Additional page(s) attached: Yes i/ , No • .)
Ce *"+ tL I
T~ t ^
LJL-^ oL^'t 7tlL u_n£L n.
^ Owv^lQjl_ ( "7 ^ _v
LkJZ^A CVv->^~ "f"
-£|L ^ ^ . JU^u
¦LkJUt^ ^ ^ JU ^ ^
CX—-^j
AJdpLb •. Q_ Cv^lAJiu3^r<, UJ
fc> tu.;. PtlSfXJL. /0-J--/A
Signature of Olwerver Affiliation of Observer Date
2f©
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
o /v n e / A u s
3ir"
. j5x <3 fa W--U v- D
Date /d - C,- ?8
Page l of 2
u a;
Qaalttjr Camel Check
Obearvatioa
Mor to Start afTcsts
Keep all daanad gtaww aealad utfl tram assembly
Aueiuble uaiuiiadnUlicB uiriromncat
Cw_^_
Vhnafly impact each H sin fnrpwum ¦uniliiji
Leva! and zbo mnonMer
Cakiilam yfopcr «gnpfinf iwrrin tin
Vtasfly inspect Type SPJtottnbe
O-e'*-?...
Leak efaadc each leg afTypeSPItot tube
IxakefaeckeadnaBpfiBgna
Daring Tearing
tmraaa point
Sample data and caknlationirecaariad on pniiamMfed
'H*o
Property moan the mil end pteh of axis afTypm 8
Pftnw and sampling nrnada
A)//)
11 at i Imii i ruin hrrfhrnTrr* " ii( mnipnaia
Maintain the praba aad filter ttmpamns
1'"""L
accuracy
4^,
Data sheen iiiimmd by PM daily during tearing
JHU 3>r rV)is^,r
_N) - l.oof
AH:
Fo^hri I. 3 o 6
-------
Date
Page 2 of 2
Quality Control Cbcek
Obaanrntioa
After Testing
Vhiwlly wwpt* miii|iIIb| nagh
Visnaily impact Type SPftottnbe
rw
Leak cfascfc cadi leg of the Typo SPttottnbe
(7 0
Leak dodctfaB eann sampling tram
/
Recod observations if any
(T
Field Log
((T -
Project nameflD and Iwwlwi
IhJ-M/ hkL h-PLh &A rt< PL r
0 AJi J
GeoinaiiiduUw in. haling map
Sampis ran times and dates
<97d rvin^ hvvdMr -~U - 9J?
Sample descriptions
MrVV«0 \"
Description ofQC smpka
/ok
Deviations tan QAPP
"ft v^'£vkMo Cc-v^*.,
s«ni|ii« Labels
<3
gml|il« uj
mir-2
Pft» «ww4 fjtmi nif I'nlWfiww
lt>-L-1g 9.7 v4w— HiUfn
T al« fwhin'iu'm mirilh
DO H
E
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
[ o w i t A btz u S i
1^1 e 1 c- c| 3 i-^
p/\ 0 0 v
Qmlttf Control Gieek
Mar to Stnt of Tests
y—p.» flwin't seated mail tram ——.ify
fctv
Ananbtotragnin dm flee ait iionment
Visually inspect each tnsi fir proper anoafaiy
Lnrei and zero xnsoamccer
ral«ii|^ pfppff ypqpfalg Hfltrifl fliB
Vltfflljjy tOTjitoty wngjfl far ghtpt
<£>
Vtaaily inspect Type SRtottnbe
t<_> C'VC-<^
Leak check each leg ofTypeS Pftottnbe
<£>.
T wilf rtwrir trwwi
Q-<
During Testing
B^^wiMnii-lllldlBfftWIBlipiBilliiwitMi^
•L
2*2
Unnsnai
noad fat test log
"¦"I"' 'y f|»^|i»li««lwm)l mid pitch rrf
Pltmi mm4 ^in^»liim tntrrim
of Typo S
/O
Leak check train bdnre and after say component
cfas&ges XBSC
Maintain ttw proiw ud fffter^nyftmrB
Maintain icb in icc
filB—mm fatm IL»U.BBtl fafmnpiawww
axxxxracy
>!£_
Hata ahem levicwrcd hv PM daiiv during twtmg
ivu-lLJ ^ ^
jy ~ J&o-i-
Ad- M?
K fete} ^
i w /3 ** f l
/ 3 fS
2?-3>
-------
Pfltf 98
page 2 of 2
Quality Control Check
Observation
After Testing
Visually inspect sampling nanie
VisiiHily inspect TypoS Pil« tube
j
Leak check each leg of the TypeS Pilot tobe
J 1
T wiir rWiflhit mlilg MlU^llllig Lffljll
J
Record observations if any
Held Log
Project nsmeflD and location
h,..
^wnplin^ petSODDBSl
Geoiogicai observations mcfnriing map
Sample ran and dates
lihkh — liz&etn io~ (?->?#
Sample desuiptima
Desaiptina ofQC sampies
oJ A
Deviations fromQAPP
-v-o
Difficulties M tmnpiwigny""''™! wHitinm
Sample Labels
s«wi|iii> rn
vn '5 , V- 7
Date and time of collection
~i:/i Am-i:3c- 3icmL<
T ahfwIiHM'iip iiwri«l«
A L
Analytical parameter
uvJl bng^i}\^
Preservative icq aired
All S^vJb^ u.-dV\ (jUo
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Ocf
Page
1991
of 5
I. Teat ton Obaervationa Bate
R ¦ Recosnended
M • Mandatory
0cJt4ft
Jb~6-9A
Test
Pim
a
PtW
Teat
Run
7
7H'Z/f
Teat
Run
3
Test
Run
4
1. Train, set up * filter ID
/66/rm
filter weight
.336>*>
j 33 7fi
filter checked for hoiea
St
filter centered ~ -
AW
¦ - - nozzle- clean- - - -
" ...
i •
noszieundaoniKed
• *
nosale dxaaeter (ini i
wmmwz-WM
probe liner cImb
grofae_aj|rfcins« correct
probe huciii along
entire- Imnth
xasxasers- iced
box Leveled
pttCC iiumoa»ter* zeroed
orifice
filter box- or* holder- atr
ail ball joints lightly
ES252i^___
alljjnmninga • capped
\^/4
ftain Leak cheek LC
at nozxla: initial- (a)- • • VAC*
{«cx'7g' line {Ri
(hold 3 in. SjOl
an snmces for
CIS sec.)
final- - noaitive- line' (ffi
? ?7¥
>J rM \ aJ/4
l
-------
a cJt cp
Page
, 199G
2 of 5
R - Recommended
M ¦ Mandatory
M-3 sampling train cheek:
initial-(MO
(should hold
10 in. vacuum final-
-------
OcJi ic
R ¦ Recomended
M " Mandatory
Test
Run
<*3
MmL.
Check on filter holder loosening of
clamping device holder
was silica gel changed
during run?
was any particulate lose
s
*//,;& \
/tAUit
inpinger* temperature
filter' box temoeragWinf
Minimum sample time of
nan mac
dacf collected
Minimum sample volume of
11603
mm
test:
openings•sealed
- recovery area- clean-sheltered
5^
-• filter handled'with- gloves'.' forceps-
- petri- dish sealed
labeled
lose
grad cyl.
weighed
water-measured
- silica gel weighed-, nee guts
- condition - color- • • & K*c^<
• • • *• spent*
- probe- cooled- sufficiengiv-
- norzie removed- and* brushed
brushed
- nozzle- brushes- clean
- vash bottles
15-minute
M/M
- water/solution clean
- blank taken:
Probe brusn
acetone-.
Sample containers-
Liauid
zfl-
-------
Page 4 of 5
R ¦ Reconacnded
M - Mandatory
Teat
Run
r 7
0^211
*&
Post test Orsac Analysis of
integrated bag saople Orsac
analyzer ~ Analyzer leak check
(levels should not fall below
cap. Cubing and not more Chan
0.2 mL in- borrette for- 2- min-. J
Initial
Each bay analyzed' 3~ times
Orsac* saapiesT
agrees* within- 0.22
I- 0? agrees-within 0.21
I- CO- agrees- within* 0.21
Analysis at end of tasc. Orsac analyzer
checked against air- (2Q-.9- »• 0-.3)
Orsac Analysis
20; 9 -
grange- for- fnel
Orsac solutions changed
when calculated
exceeds fuel type-range
All ssacles locked up
All sasmiing- components- ei»»n- and- sealed
All data* sheets submitted to* observer*
97 9 /*z:2 V
- Run- isoicenecic-
- Particulate- recovery
- process* data
-• Calibration sneecs
-------
, i99a
Page 5 of 5
J. NOTES: Care should be taken, when sampling for organic compounds, to
follow stringent quality control guidelines to avoid contamination of the
sample and sampling train. Take note of any occurences which could bias
the sample in any manner.
Include: (1) General comments; (2) Changes to pretest agreement with
justification; (3) Identify (manufacturer) and describe condition of
sampling equipment; (4) any abnormal occurrence^ during test program
(Additional page(s) attached: Yes• • • , No .)
Affiliation of Observer
Date
•j-r)
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
/ o At Ai-e / *f~ 7
Mef-krJ 3 page 1 of 2
P1/3 O t Qp/uwiJ I4e IzSclfO In jO ->
' T\ u A> _J
Qnatitf Coatiei Ouek
Otnarrrioa
Mar to Stat afTestt
T'lHiin i In ¦mill (i liim ¦ i ^Tfiltrnn ¦minililji
(tinmliU |[«iin in ft"** fimwwmnuiimt
Vhnfly inpKtadKm ftrpraporo—nfajy
Leiai ad xao oaaonMr
ffff|TT"'',T^l,I IMmla MM
VimBjr jnpeec«n|iiiDg]BBcie fir ddpt
Visiiaflyinspoet'IVpoSPtottnbo
^—
LakehedcediieganVptSFtatnfai
CAv*_
Leak UmaJl uuiiu miniftig ttm
Oaring Tarint
Raadtaipaaoires ndtfiflbreattai fnon at net
UAiuwfidat
UtaMi oceonrnceinomdla wleg
Pnp^iaaisnmtfaBroiiadpitdxofssisafTypes
T i lii Im i mill Imfnm inri *af \ injf ihiumsmihi
the probe md fTTtrrtnB(m»nuB
M—.H.,,11
Data sheets reviewed by PM daily daring testing
8(i MtbW^
3 - /,06/
4H-
F»ck»*- /, ?<3
- Soo
-------
Date ' 7^3
Page 2 of 2
Rbhj 3
Quality Control Check
After Testing
VWw«l|y in»|i— t ¦¦in^llny wnwte
Vfajaily inspect Type SHtottnbe
-^sa.
Leak dtedcesdi leg of the TypeS Pitos tube
I mir wmpling wm
-W
4&L
Record observations if any
Field Log
MiJftsxJ- Spl
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
Ji4 ui j
Ak+Jitej 3 /'>-
AH r /¦
Jol- AT /-echt /,3/S
Date
Page
/?
/6-?-9<0
1 of 2
L> A) &
-------
Date /D '7-'?e&
Page 2 of 2
Quality Control Check
After Testing
-4-
Visually inspect sampling nozzle
4feL
Vbnaiiy inspect T>po S Pftotfnbe
Leak check each leg ofth# Type SPftot tube
T **tlrrhrm.If thu *wfim—wptfwy «rwwi
4^
Record obsntaiiuni if any
4^
Field Log
(ioii'ih iJiW/x - P/oaJ P fe^lrfg
Project namcflD and Inrarirm
Sampling pmonnel (namea/posmon)
Alll/i,, LtnjLre.
n-7-?A
(«'M h /.V? n
uocnpooEi ox yu sBopm
/)//?
Deviations ftom QAPP
DifiBcnities in
gaifipjo I jtmli
4&L
s«ni|ii« nj
n«w «iiH ~fmo
-------
Emission Test
Hot Asphalt Plant D
Barre, Massachusetts
Ocf 7
Page
199G
of 5
I. Teat Run Observations Date
R - Beconnended
M - Mandatory
/D-szn
'<>-'¦96
Teat
Run
3
M-*,r
Test
Run
**rd
•^/T
Teat
Run
3
Test
Run
4
1. Train sec-up " filter ID
1
filter weight
,337/
.339 b
filter checked for holes
stAtA
filter centered
- nozzle clean - - -
nozzle- undamaged
• XA/yl '
nozzle diameter (inii
?/GC/
f/A-7
probe liner elan
\fs*
probe markings correct
I*,*
probe haated alone
entire- length
impinge rs* charged
¦ • 1 •
fiitBr box* oy hoi»*—— mr~~
All bail joints lightly
grewd
all- openings- capped-
Train leak check
at nozzle: initial; (R-)*
(
-------
ctcjt /
, 199
/*£2A
/bl-fZ
R - Recommended
M - Mandatory
H-3 sampling train check:
initial-
-------
, 1993
Page
3 of
Dace
R ™ Recosnended
M - Mandatory
{k32L
Test
Run
£tM-
Test
Run
^8
JtML
Test
Run
3
Test
Run
4
Check on filter holder loosening of
clmoingjdevicejiolder
was silica gel changed
during run?
/TiyO
LJTUz
was any particulate
Lost?
Accurate
reading oft
80 MM
• /Sin**
¦<*
lmoinger* teaperatnre
filter* boz temoerature
Minimum sample tine of _'gVd • Bin net
Minimum sample volume of * • • dacf collected
— All' openings- sealed
- recovery area- clean* sheltered
-filter handled* with' gloves'," forceps
- petrv dish sealed, labeled*
grad cyl.
weighed
L^mL
water- measured
- silica- gel-weighed-. -net*
- condition - color-
s' spent
WMMMgZlSm
- probe- cooled- sufficiently
d* and* brushed
- probe brushed 6- fi™*s
- nozzle'brushes* clean
- wash bottles clean
- M-o 15- minute- purge
, | .t t - water/solution clean
- blank taken:
>* kM«an* «fiW av*
acetone*. - water*.
Probe brush- ana extension clean-.
Clean
Samoie container?
Laoeied
Lxouid* level' marked
1&C*
-------
Oct 7 ,^y<5
Page 4 of 5
Date
R " Reconnetided
M - Mandatory
/6-7-fS
Test
Run
s*3
jo- 7-94
Test
Run
*e
Test
Run
3
Test
Run
4
9.
Initial'(Mi
Pose test OrsaC Analysis of
integrated bag saaple Orsac
analyser ~ Analyser leak check
(levels should noc fall below Final (M)
cap. tubing and not more than """
0.2 mL in- bnrrette for- 2- min.)
jolA
ok
4t
wlft
a!fir
*k
Orsaf aaaoieat Each bag analyzed 3- tines
A)/*
I C0«> agrees-virhin- 0.2X-
X- Of agrees- vithin Q-.2X-
X- CO- agrees- within- 0.21
m
Analysis at end of test. Orsac analyzer
checked against air- (20;9-0-.3)
Art
JIUL
Jlld
MA
•tilA- • • • t) /a
Orsac Analysis:
CO ol
0«>X-
¦a)!A ¦ rt/A
COX
Wrffl
Fo ¦ 20.
9 -
I
CO,
°2
Fuel
M-
-mr
F„range for- fuel
Orsat" analysis- valid-
10. All samples locked up
Orsac solutions changed
when calculated F0
exceeds fuel type* range-
A
Mr
2ZTL
i&JL
W1
•[ 1
/j/A
All saapiing^conponents^£iw«^gTv^«»«^^
All data* sheecs submitted- to- observer*
f
- Orsac
WMm
- Run- isofcenetic
Teamy Observer-'
•r -
- Psrcicuiace- recovery-
£i*a
~%7a
- Process- data-
- Charts-
A I- A3/ A
- Calibration sheets-
6
¦ o2c ' ? %
3®^
-------
, L99C
Page 5 of 5
J. NOTES: Care should be taken, when sampling for organic compounds, to
follow stringent quality control guidelines to avoid contamination of the
sample and sampling train. Take note of any occurences which could bias
the sample in any manner.
Include: (1) General cosments; (2) Changes to pretest agreement with
justification; (3) Identify (manufacturer) and describe condition of
sampling equipment; (4) any abnormal occurrences during test program.
(Additional page(s) attached: Yes • • • , No if . J
PJhA&C. JJ /a^?f
Signature of Observer Affiliation of Observer Date
fc
-------
O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Filter Tare Weight Worksheet
Plant; /!*¦* A City, State: Ma / /
Date: /a —StfJ Initials: jPP H
RUN ID
FILTER
ID
REFERENCE
TARE
WEIGHT
DATA
SHEET
TARE WT.
ANALYTICAL
TARE
WEIGHT #r
i*i3/r- i
/60i?f-6*
, 3Vt>?
, 33
. ~2—
. 3 V o i
,3%*-
r.5 x-
Mur- 2
/Odffl-tft
- ^363
, 3343
3 3 6 3
flhr- 7
/bo /9A-&8
.3376
, 3373
339c?
nut- 3
/bOlJtol
s 33?/
. 349/
33 9/
W 3j 5T- /?
/a
.3^96
/ 3390
.33
/ c> c>/9£- e>l
. 336,J
/06/?t'6l
. .? U6,
/60ffp -/o
. 338V
MW P\ ' A. Q
IHCEWV K-j-ys,
-JL U 4JlA
Cm.- 5
-------
O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Nozzle Calibration Worksheet
Plant:/Va/ A PL*,l D City, State: Bafrr JS
Date: Initials: f? P &
RUN ID
Ma/f - /
NOZZLE
ID
CALIBRATION
DIAMETER
DATA
SHEET
DIAMETER
CALIBRATION
DATE
TEST
DATE
M3/r-
G L - 3
, /*
-------
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. (919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Corrective Action Report
V\*nfr.J& -P/aui Z) City, State:
Originator:
Date:
Project Number:
SS/1- ^61.
Corrective Action Number:
Description of Problem
(Give Date and Time Identified) /o
/It^v
UrC- (S~ -4~
e,L™„ (, \
Ur«- C
State Cause of Problem
LaJG-** cz_ ~T~
-------
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
' PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. (919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Data Sheet Completeness Worksheet
Plant: City, State: /3d-M-eft)
Date: /6 ~ J~~ 9A Initials: fD P
Run ID
Nozzle
Number
Filter
Number
Post-Test
Leak Check
Post-Test
Pitot Leak
Check
Start and
Stop Time
Pitot
Number
M3/r- /
- /
/a* /9£—& r
, ddf/VA}"#
„ m
>>i e>*
55 g/
O/A* tJH
fiP-/9
pi 3/r~
a'
tdtfcg* /a Vfc
A*
yJ /;#*•, r>)
&S /
rt3/r- 2
GL- (
j60t?S-69
7,1*2
/?/>-/?
M l/T-7
CU-3
tc>6/98~C>8
,003 ?/,?/#
&/'
A3/X-3
C,t- /
/60/96-bl
t60Sp6«fy
ft A;
73 d^elr
of,Aw
ftil P.W
AP-/9
(3
//>/> /<*#-&(&
~ fy3 °K
75 A)&>] e\
6s?i A-tn
j:i3 pm
f
-------
Central Park West
5001 South Miami Boulevard, P.O. Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
(919) 941-0333 FAX: (919) 941-0234
Pitot Calibration Worksheet
Plant: /*£/AijsLJl} - Pkm i D City, State: /3 } frl lA/i .
Date: ) Q - ~ f S Initials: JD P hi
RUN ID
PITOT
ID
CALIBRATION
COEFFICIENT
DATA
SHEET
COEFF.
CALIBRATION
DATE
TEST
DATE
M3/T- I
/f^l?
*
7-/V-?c5
/d-r-w
/)1 .¦? /r- (o
/
. H
/&- /J-
/b-s-fg
fl3/r- o
, sv
-
7-/V-94
py
ft 3/r-tf
/rs/
<
, /? V
/o-n- ?&
//>- 6> - 9$
M3/S--3
ff-zy
ffi V
7 -/V-?6
S3- 7-7#
m ?/ r- 8
£St
sSY
I6-1X*
Zo-7-9/2
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
313
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST METHODS
-------
METHOD 1
-------
EMISSION MEASUREMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER
NSPS TEST METHOD
Method 1 - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources
1. PRINCIPLE AND APPLICABILITY
1.1 Principle. To aid in the representative measurement of
pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a
stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is
flowing in a known direction is selected, and the cross-section of
the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse
point is then located within each of these equal areas.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable to flowing gas
streams in ducts, stacks, and flues. The method cannot be used
when: (1) flow is cyclonic or swirling (see Section 2.4), (2) a
stack is smaller than about 0.30 meter (12 in.) in diameter, or
0.071 m2 (113 in.2) in cross-sectional area, or (3) the measurement
site is less than two stack or duct diameters downstream or less
than a half diameter upstream from a flow disturbance.
The requirements of this method must be considered before
construction of a new facility from which emissions will be
measured; failure to do so may require subsequent alterations to
the stack or deviation from the standard procedure. Cases
involving variants are subject to approval by the Administrator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
2. PROCEDURE
2.1 Selection of Measurement Site. Sampling or velocity
measurement is performed at a site located at least eight stack or
duct diameters downstream and two diameters upstream from any flow
disturbance such as a bend, expansion, or contraction in the stack,
or from a visible flame. If necessary, an alternative location may
Prepared by Emission Measurement Branch EMTIC TM-001
Technical Support Division, OAQPS, EPA
3i&
-------
EMISSION MEASUREMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER
NSPS TEST METHOD
be selected, at a position at least two stack or duct diameters
downstream and a half diameter upstream from any flow disturbance.
For a rectangular cross section, an equivalent diameter (De) shall
be calculated from the following equation, to determine the
upstream and downstream distances:
2 L W
D =
e (L + W)
Eq. 1-1
Where
L = Length and W = width.
An alternative procedure is available for determining the
acceptability of a measurement location not meeting the criteria
above. This procedure,
determination of gas flow angles at the sampling points and
comparing the results with acceptability criteria, is described in
Section 2.5.
2.2 Determining the Number of Traverse Points.
2.2.1 Particulate Traverses. When the eight- and two-diameter
criterion can be met, the minimum number of traverse points shall
be: (1) twelve, for circular or rectangular stacks with diameters
(or equivalent diameters) greater than 0.61 meter (24 in.); (2)
eight, for circular stacks with diameters between 0.30 and 0.61
meter (12 and 24 in.); and (3) nine, for rectangular stacks with
equivalent diameters between 0.30 and 0.61 meter (12 and 24 in.).
When the eight- and two-diameter criterion cannot be met, the
minimum number of traverse points is determined from Figure 1-1.
Before referring to the figure, however, determine the distances
Prepared by Emission Measurement Branch
Technical Support Division, OAQPS, EPA
EMTIO TM-001
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 3
from the chosen measurement site to the nearest upstream and
downstream disturbances, and divide each distance by the stack
diameter or equivalent diameter, to determine the distance in terms
of the number of duct diameters. Then, determine from Figure 1-1
the minimum number of traverse points that corresponds: (1) to the
number of duct diameters upstream; and (2) to the number of
diameters downstream. Select the higher of the two minimum numbers
of traverse points, or a greater value, so that for circular stacks
the number is a multiple of 4, and for rectangular stacks, the
number is one of those shown in Table 1-1.
2.2.2 Velocity (Non-Particulate) Traverses. When velocity or
volumetric flow rate is to be determined (but not particulate
matter), the same procedure as that used for particulate traverses
(Section 2.2.1) is followed, except that Figure 1-2 may be used
instead of Figure 1-1.
2.3 Cross-Sectional Layout and Location of Traverse Points.
2.3.1 Circular Stacks. Locate the traverse points on two
perpendicular diameters according to Table 1-2 and the example
shown in Figure 1-3. Any equation (for examples, see Citations 2
and 3 in the Bibliography) that gives the same values as those in
Table 1-2 may be used in lieu of Table 1-2.
For particulate traverses, one of the diameters must be in a plane
containing the greatest expected concentration variation, e.g.,
after bends, one diameter shall be in the plane of the bend. This
requirement becomes less critical as the distance from the
disturbance increases; therefore, other diameter locations may be
used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
In addition, for stacks having diameters greater than 0.61 m (24
in.), no traverse points shall be within 2.5 centimeters (1.00 in.)
of the stack walls; and for stack diameters equal to or less than
0.61 m (24 in.), no traverse points shall be located within 1.3 cm
(0.50 in.) of the stack walls. To meet these criteria, observe the
procedures given below.
2.3.1.1 Stacks With Diameters Greater Than 0.61 m (24 in.). When
3^0
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 4
any of the traverse points as located in Section 2.3.1 fall within
2.5 cm (1.00 in.) of the
stack walls, relocate them away from the stack walls to: (1) a
distance of
2.5 cm (1.00 in.); or (2) a distance equal to the nozzle inside
diameter, whichever is larger. These relocated traverse points (on
each end of a diameter) shall be the "adjusted" traverse points.
Whenever two successive traverse points are combined to form a
single adjusted traverse point, treat the adjusted point as two
separate traverse points, both in the sampling (or velocity
measurement) procedure, and in recording the data.
2.3.1.2 Stacks With Diameters Equal To or Less Than 0.61 m (24
in.). Follow the procedure in Section 2.3.1.1, noting only that
any "adjusted" points should be relocated away from the stack walls
to: (1) a distance of 1.3 cm (0.50 in.); or (2) a distance equal to
the nozzle inside diameter, whichever is larger.
2.3.2 Rectangular Stacks. Determine the number of traverse points
as explained in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of this method. From Table 1-
1, determine the grid configuration. Divide the stack cross-
section into as many equal rectangular elemental areas as traverse
points, and then locate a traverse point at the centroid of each
equal area according to the example in Figure 1-4.
If the tester desires to use more than the minimum number of
traverse points, expand the "minimum number of traverse points"
matrix (see Table 1-1) by adding the extra traverse points along
one or the other or both legs of the matrix; the final matrix need
not be balanced. For example, if a 4 x 3 "minimum number of
points" matrix were expanded to 36 points, the final matrix could
be 9 x 4 or 12 x 3, and would not necessarily have to be 6 x 6.
After constructing the final matrix, divide the stack cross-section
into as many equal rectangular, elemental areas as traverse points,
and locate a traverse point at the centroid of each equal area. The
situation of traverse points being too close to the stack walls is
not expected to arise with rectangular stacks. If this problem
should ever arise, the Administrator must be contacted for
resolution of the matter.
3 M
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 5
2.4 Verification of Absence of Cyclonic Flow. In most stationary
sources, the direction of stack gas flow is essentially parallel to
the stack walls. However, cyclonic flow may exist (1) after such
devices as cyclones and inertial demisters following venturi
scrubbers, or (2) in stacks having tangential inlets or other duct
configurations which tend to induce swirling; in these instances,
the presence or absence of cyclonic flow at the sampling location
must be determined. The following techniques are acceptable for
this determination. Level and zero the manometer. Connect a Type
S pitot tube to the manometer. Position the Type S pitot tube at
each traverse point, in succession, so that the planes of the face
openings of the pitot tube are perpendicular to the stack cross-
sectional plane; when the Type S pitot tube is in this position, it
is at "0° reference." Note the differential pressure (Ap) reading
at each traverse point. If a null (zero) pitot reading is obtained
at 0° reference at a given traverse point, an acceptable flow
condition exists at that point. If the pitot reading is not zero
at 0° reference, rotate the pitot tube (up to ±90° yaw angle) ,
until a null reading is obtained. Carefully determine and record
the value of the rotation angle (a) to the nearest degree. After
the null technique
has been applied at each traverse point, calculate the average of
the absolute values of a; assign a values of 0° to those points for
which no rotation was required, and include these in the overall
average. If the average value of a is greater than 20°, the
overall flow condition in the stack is unacceptable, and
alternative methodology, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, must be used to perform accurate sample and velocity
traverses. The alternative procedure described in Section 2.5 may
be used to determine the rotation angles in lieu of the procedure
described above.
2.5 Alternative Measurement Site Selection Procedure. This
alternative applies to sources where measurement locations are less
than 2 equivalent or duct diameters downstream or less than one-
half duct diameter upstream from a flow disturbance. The
alternative should be limited to ducts larger than 24 in. in
diameter where blockage and wall effects are minimal. A
directional flow-sensing probe is used to measure pitch and yaw
angles of the gas flow at 4 0 or more traverse points; the resultant
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 6
angle is calculated and compared with acceptable criteria for mean
and standard deviation.
NOTE: Both the pitch and yaw angles are measured from a line
passing through the traverse point and parallel to the stack axis.
The pitch angle is the angle of the gas flow component in the plane
that INCLUDES the traverse line and is parallel to the stack axis.
The yaw angle is the angle of the gas flow component in the plane
PERPENDICULAR to the traverse line at the traverse point and is
measured from the line passing through the traverse point and
parallel to the stack axis.
2.5.1 Apparatus.
2.5.1.1 Directional Probe. Any directional probe, such as United
Sensor Type DA Three-Dimensional Directional Probe, capable of
measuring both the pitch and yaw angles of gas flows is acceptable.
(NOTE: Mention of trade name or specific products does not
constitute endorsement by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.) Assign an identification number to the directional probe,
and permanently mark or engrave the number on the body of the
probe. The pressure holes of directional probes are susceptible to
plugging when used in particulate-laden gas streams. Therefore, a
system for cleaning the pressure holes by "back-purging" with
pressurized air is required.
2.5.1.2 Differential Pressure Gauges. Inclined manometers, U-tube
manometers, or other differential pressure gauges (e.g., magnehelic
gauges) that meet the specifications described in Method 2, Section
2.2.
NOTE: If the differential pressure gauge produces both negative
and positive readings, then both negative and positive pressure
readings shall be calibrated at a minimum of three points as
specified in Method 2, Section 2.2.
2.5.2 Traverse Points. Use a minimum of 4 0 traverse points for
circular ducts and 42 points for rectangular ducts for the gas flow
angle determinations. Follow Section 2.3 and Table 1-1 or 1-2 for
3*2-3>
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 7
the location and layout of the traverse points. If the measurement
location is determined to be acceptable
according to the criteria in this alternative procedure, use the
same traverse point number and locations for sampling and velocity
measurements.
2.5.3 Measurement Procedure.
2.5.3.1 Prepare the directional probe and differential pressure
gauges as recommended by the manufacturer. Capillary tubing or
surge tanks may be used to dampen pressure fluctuations. It is
recommended, but not required, that a pretest leak check be
conducted. To perform a leak check, pressurize or use suction on
the impact opening until a reading of at least 7.6 cm (3 in.) H20
registers on the differential pressure gauge, then plug the impact
opening. The pressure of a leak-free system will remain stable for
at least 15 seconds.
2.5.3.2 Level and zero the manometers. Since the manometer level
and zero may drift because of vibrations and temperature changes,
periodically check the level and zero during the traverse.
2.5.3.3 Position the probe at the appropriate locations in the gas
stream, and rotate until zero deflection is indicated for the yaw
angle pressure gauge. Determine and record the yaw angle. Record
the pressure gauge readings for the pitch angle, and determine the
pitch angle from the calibration curve. Repeat this procedure for
each traverse point. Complete a "back-purge" of the pressure lines
and the impact openings prior to measurements of each traverse
point.
A post-test check as described in Section 2.5.3.1 is required. If
the criteria for a leak-free system are not met, repair the
equipment, and repeat the flow angle measurements.
2.5.4 Calculate the resultant angle at each traverse point, the
average resultant angle, and the standard deviation using the
following equations. Complete the calculations retaining at least
one extra significant figure beyond that of the acquired data.
3^
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 8
Round the values after the final calculations.
2.5.4.1 Calculate the resultant angle at each traverse point:
R. = arc cosine[(cosineY.) (cosineP.)]
1 k * 1 1
Eq. 1-2
Where:
Ri = resultant angle at traverse point i, degree,
Yi = yaw angle at traverse point i, degree.
Pi = pitch angle at traverse point i, degree.
2.5.4.2 Calculate the average resultant for the measurements:
_ Er,
n
Where:
Ravg = average resultant angle, degree
n = total number of traverse points
2.5.4.3 Calculate the standard deviations:
Hj. 1-3
s< = N
n
£ (Rt-R)
i=i
(n-l)
S3. 1-4
Where
standard deviation, degree
2.5.5 The measurement location is acceptable if Ravg £ 20° and Sd
<; 10°.
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIO NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 9
2.5.6 Calibration. Use a flow system as described in Sections
4.1.2.1 and 4.1.2.2 of Method 2. In addition, the flow system
shall have the capacity to generate two test-section velocities:
one between 365 and 730 m/min (1200 and 2400 ft/min) and one
between 730 and 1100 m/min (2400 and 3600 ft/min).
2.5.6.1 Cut two entry ports in the test section. The axes through
the entry ports shall be perpendicular to each other and intersect
in the centroid of the test section. The ports should be elongated
slots parallel to the axis of the test section and of sufficient
length to allow measurement of pitch angles while maintaining the
pitot head position at the test-section centroid. To facilitate
alignment of the directional probe during calibration, the test
section should be constructed of plexiglass or some other
transparent material. All calibration measurements should be made
at the same point in the test section, preferably at the centroid
of the test section.
2.5.6.2 To ensure that the gas flow is parallel to the central
axis of the test section, follow the procedure in Section 2.4 for
cyclonic flow determination to measure the gas flow angles at the
centroid of the test section from two test ports located 90° apart.
The gas flow angle measured in each port must be ±2° of 0°.
Straightening vanes should be installed, if necessary, to meet this
criterion.
2.5.6.3 Pitch Angle Calibration. Perform a calibration traverse
according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol in 5°
increments for angles from -60° to +60° at one velocity in each of
the two ranges specified above. Average the pressure ratio values
obtained for each angle in the two flow ranges, and plot a
calibration curve with the average values of the pressure ratio (or
other suitable measurement factor as recommended by the
manufacturer) versus the pitch angle. Draw a smooth line through
the data points. Plot also the data values for each traverse
point. Determine the differences between the measured datavalues
and the angle from the calibration curve at the same pressure
ratio. The difference at each comparison must be within 2° for
angles between 0° and 4 0° and within 3° for angles between 40° and
3-l.C
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 10
60°.
2.5.6.4 Yaw Angle Calibration. Mark the three-dimensional probe
to allow the determination of the yaw position of the probe. This
is usually a line extending the length of the probe and aligned
with the impact opening. To determine the accuracy of measurements
of the yaw angle, only the zero or null position need be calibrated
as follows: Place the directional probe in the test section, and
rotate the probe until the zero position is found. With a
protractor or other angle measuring device, measure the angle
indicated by the yaw angle indicator on the three-dimensional
probe. This should be within 2° of 0°. Repeat this measurement
for any other points along the length of the pitot where yaw angle
measurements could be read in order to account for variations in
the pitot markings used to indicate pitot head positions.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Determining Dust Concentration in a Gas Stream, ASME
Performance Test Code No. 27. New York. 1957.
2. DeVorkin, Howard, et al. Air Pollution Source Testing Manual.
Air Pollution Control District. Los Angeles, CA. November
1963 .
3. Methods for Determining of Velocity, Volume, Dust and Mist
Content of Gases. Western Precipitation Division of Joy
Manufacturing Co. Los Angeles, CA. Bulletin WP-50. 1968.
4. Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for Particulate Matter.
In: 1971 Book of ASTM Standards, Part 23. ASTM Designation D
2928-71. Philadelphia, PA. 1971.
5. Hanson, H.A., et al. Particulate Sampling Strategies for
Large Power Plants Including Nonuniform Flow. USEPA, ORD,
ESRL, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-600/2-76-170. June
1976 .
6. Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. Determination of the Optimum
3^
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 11
Number of Sampling Points: An Analysis of Method 1 Criteria.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC.
EPA Contract No. 68-01-3172, Task 7.
7. Hanson, H.A., R.J. Davini, J.K. Morgan, and A.A. Iversen.
Particulate Sampling Strategies for Large Power Plants
Including Nonuniform Flow. USEPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Publication No. EPA-600/2-76-170. June 1976. 350 p.
8. Brooks, E.F., and R.L. Williams. Flow and Gas Sampling
Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, NC. Publication No. EPA-600/2-76-203. July
1976. 93 p.
9. Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. Traverse Point Study. EPA
Contract No. 68-02-3172. June 1977. 19 p.
10. Brown, J. and K. Yu. Test Report: Particulate Sampling
Strategy in Circular Ducts. Emission Measurement Branch.
Emission Standards and Engineering Division. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711. July 31, 1980. 12 p.
11. Hawksley, P.G.W., S. Badzioch, and J.H. Blackett. Measurement
of Solids in Flue Gases. Leatherhead, England, The British
Coal Utilisation Research Association. 1961. p. 129-133.
12. Knapp, K.T. The Number of Sampling Points Needed for
Representative Source Sampling. In: Proceedings of the Fourth
National Conference on Energy and Environment. Theodore, L.
et al. (ed) . Dayton, Dayton Section of the American Institute
of Chemical Engineers. October 3-7, 1976. p. 563-568.
13. Smith, W.S. and D.J. Grove. A Proposed Extension of EPA
Method 1 Criteria. Pollution Engineering. XV (8):36-37.
August 1983.
14. Gerhart, P.M. and M.J. Dorsey. Investigation of Field Test
Procedures for Large Fans. University of Akron. Akron, OH.
3i%
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 12
(EPRI Contract CS-1651). Final Report (RP-1649-5). December
1980 .
15. Smith, W.S. and D.J. Grove. A New Look at Isokinetic Sampling
Theory and Applications. Source Evaluation Society
Newsletter. VIII(3):19-24. August 1983.
-------
EMTIC TM-001 EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD Page 13
Table 1-1. CROSS-SECTION LAYOUT FOR
RECTANGULAR STACKS
Number of traverse points
Matrix layout
9 3x3
12 4x3
16 4x4
20 5x4
25 5x5
30 6x5
36 6x6
42 7x6
4 9 7x7
330
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 14
TABLE 1-2
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS
(Percent of stack diameter from inside
wall to traverse point)
Traverse
Point
Number on a
Diameter
Number of traverse points on a diameter
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
1
14
. 6
6 .
7
4 .
4
3 .
2
2.6
2 .1
1.8
1.6
1.
4
1.
3
1.1
1.1
2
85
.4
25
. 0
14
.6
10
. 5
8.2
6.7
5 . 7
4 . 9
4 .
4
3 .
9
3.5
3.2
3
75
. 0
29
. 6
19
.4
14 .
6
11.
8
9 . 9
8 . 5
7.
5
6 .
7
6 . 0
5.5
4
93
. 3
70
.4
32
.3
22 .
6
17.
7
14 .
6
12 .
5
10
. 9
9 .
7
8 . 7
7 . 9
5
85
.4
67
. 7
34 .
2
25.
0
20 .
1
16 .
9
14
.6
11
2 .
9
11.
6
10 .
5
6
95
. 6
80
. 6
65 .
8
35.
6
26 .
9
22 .
0
18
. 8
16
. 5
14 .
6
13 .
2
7
89
.5
77 .
4
64 .
4
36 .
6
28 .
3
23
. 6
20
.4
18 .
0
16 .
1
8
96
. 8
85.
4
75.
0
63 .
4
37.
5
29
. 6
25
. 0
21.
8
19 .
4
9
91.
8
82 .
3
73 .
1
62 .
5
38
. 2
30
.6
26 .
2
23 .
0
10 ....
97 .
4
88 .
2
79 .
9
71.
7
61
. 8
38
. 8
31.
5
27 .
2
11 ....
93 .
3
85 .
4
78 .
0
70
.4
61
. 2
39 .
3
32 .
3
33 (
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 15
12 ....
97 .
9
90 .
1
83 .
1
76
.4
69
.4
60 .
7
39 .
8
13 ....
94 .
3
87 .
5
81
.2
75
. 0
68 .
5
60 .
2
14 ....
98 .
2
91.
5
85
.4
79
. 6
73 .
8
67.
7
15 ....
95 .
1
89
. 1
83
. 5
78 .
2
72 .
8
16 ....
98 .
4
92
. 5
87
. 1
82 .
0
77.
0
17 ....
95
. 6
90
. 3
85 .
4
80 .
6
18 ....
98
. 6
93
.3
88 .
4
83 .
9
19 ....
96
. 1
91.
3
86 .
8
20 ....
98
. 7
94 .
0
89 .
5
21 ....
96 .
5
92 .
1
22 ....
98 .
9
94 .
5
23 ....
96 .
8
24 ....
98 .
9
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 16
Duct Diamatars Upstream from Flow Disturbance* (Oistence A)
1.0 1.5 2.0
Hlghor Number is for
Roctanguiar Stacks ©f Duets
Moasuroniont
Ska
10 Stack Diamotar > 0.61 m (24 in.)
1 12
* From Point of Any Typo of
Disturbance (Band. Expansion, Contraction, ate.)
8 or 9
3 4 S 6 7 6
Ouct Diameter* Downstream from Flow Disturbance* (Diatanca B)
Stack Dlamotar ¦ 0 30 to 0.61 m (12-24 in.)
J I L
10
Figure 1-1. Minimum number of traverse points for
particulate traverses.
"333,
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIO NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 17
50
0.5
Duct Diamatars Upstream from Flow Disturbanea* (Distance A)
1.0 1.5 2.0
2.5
I 1
Higher Number \t for
Rectangular Stacks or Ducts
T
T
T
40 -
30
20 -
10
* Ffom Point of Any Type of
Disturbanea (Bond, Expansion, Contraction, stc.)
_L
_L
^Disturbance
Measurement
Site
Stack Diameter > 0 61 m (24 in.)
12
Stack Diameter* 0.30 to 0.61 m (12-24 in.)
_L
_L
3 4 5 6 7 8
Duct Diameters Downstream from Flow Disturbance* (Distance B)
10
Figure 1-2. Minimum number of traverse points for velocity
(nonparticulate) traverses.
3-H
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 18
Trav«r*»
Point
Distance
% of diamtter
4.4
14.7
29.5
70 5
85.3
95.6
• •
Figure 1-3. Example showing circular stack cross section
divided into 12 equal areas, with location of traverse
points indicated.
33
-------
EMTIC TM-001
EMTIC NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 19
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
L
o
o
o
o
Figure 1-4. Example showing rectangular stack cross section
divided into 12 equal areas, with a traverse point at centroid
of each area.
33
-------
METHOD 2
-------
EMISSION MEASUREMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER
NSPS TEST METHOD
Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric
Flow Rate (Type S Fitot Tube)
1. PRINCIPLE AND APPLICABILITY
1.1 Principle. The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas
density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S
(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for measurement of the average
velocity of a gas stream and for quantifying gas flow.
This procedure is not applicable at measurement sites that fail to meet the
criteria of Method l, Section 2.1. Also, the method cannot be used for direct
measurement in cyclonic or swirling gas streams; Section 2.4 of Method 1 shows
how to determine cyclonic or swirling flow conditions. When unacceptable
conditions exist, alternative procedures, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, must be employed to make
accurate flow rate determinations; examples of such alternative procedures are:
(1) to install straightening vanes; (2) to calculate the total volumetric flow
rate stoichiometrically, or (3) to move to another measurement site at which the
flow is acceptable.
2. APPARATUS
Specifications for the apparatus are given below. Any other apparatus that has
been demonstrated (subject to approval of the Administrator) to be capable of
meeting the specifications will be considered acceptable.
2.1 Type S Pitot Tube. Pitot tube made of metal tubing (e.g., stainless steel)
as shown in Figure 2-1. It is recommended that the external tubing diameter
(dimension Dc, Figure 2-2b) be between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 inch).
There shall be an equal distance from the base of each leg of the pitot tube to
its face-opening plane (dimensions PA and , Figure 2-2b) ; it is recommended
that this distance be between 1.05 and 1.50 times the external tubing diameter.
The face openings of the pitot tube shall, preferably, be aligned as shown in
Figure 2-2; however, slight misalignments of the openings are permissible (see
Figure 2-3).
The Type S pitot tube shall have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in
Section 4. An identification number shall be assigned to the pitot tube; this
Prepared by Emission Measurement Branch EMTIC M-002
Technical Support Division, OAQPS, EPA
-------
EMISSION MEASUREMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER
NSPS TEST METHOD
number shall be permanently marked or engraved on the body of the tube. A
standard pitot tube may be used instead of a Type S, provided that it meets the
specifications of Sections 2.7 and 4.2; note, however, that the static and impact
pressure holes of standard pitot tubes are susceptible to plugging in
particulate-laden gas streams. Therefore, whenever a standard pitot tube is used
to perform a traverse, adequate proof must be furnished that the openings of the
pitot tube have not plugged up during the traverse period; this can be done by
taking a velocity head (Ap) reading at the final traverse point, cleaning out the
impact and static holes of the standard pitot tube by "back-purging" with
pressurized air, and then taking another Ap reading. If the Ap readings made
before and after the air purge are the same (±5 percent) , the traverse is
acceptable. Otherwise, reject the run. Note that if Ap at the final traverse
point is unsuitably low, another point may be selected. If "back-purging" at
regular intervals is part of the procedure, then comparative Ap readings shall
be taken, as above, for the last two back purges at which suitably high Ap
readings are observed.
2.2 Differential Pressure Gauge. An inclined manometer or equivalent device.
Most sampling trains are equipped with a 10-in. (water column) inclined-vertical
manometer, having 0.01-in. H20 divisions on the 0- to 1-in. inclined scale, and
0.1-in. H20 divisions on the 1- to 10-in. vertical scale. This type of manometer
(or other gauge of equivalent sensitivity) is satisfactory for the measurement
of Ap values as low as 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) H20. However, a differential pressure
gauge of greater sensitivity shall be used (subject to the approval of the
Administrator), if any of the following is found to be true: (1) the arithmetic
average of all Ap readings at the traverse points in the stack is less than
1.3 mm (0.05 in.) H20; (2) for traverses of 12 or more points, more than 10
percent of the individual Ap readings are below 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) H20; (3) for
traverses of fewer than 12 points, more than one Ap reading is below 1.3 mm
(0.05 in.) H20. Citation 18 in the Bibliography describes commercially available
instrumentation for the measurement of low-range gas velocities.
As an alternative to criteria (1) through (3) above, the following calculation
may be performed to determine the necessity of using a more sensitive
differential pressure gauge:
Prepared by Emission Measurement Branch EMTIC M-002
Technical Support Division, OAQPS, EPA
-------
EMTIC TM-002
Page 3
n
T =
E^,+*
1=1
n
1=1
Where:
Api
Individual velocity head reading at a traverse point, mm (in.)
H20.
n
Total number of traverse points.
K
0.13 mm H20 when metric units are used and 0.005 in. H20 when
English units are used.
If T is greater than 1.05, the velocity head data are unacceptable and a more
sensitive differential pressure gauge must be used.
NOTE: If differential pressure gauges other than inclined manometers are used
(e.g., magnehelic gauges), their calibration must be checked after each test
series. To check the calibration of a differential pressure gauge, compare Ap
readings of the gauge with those of a gauge-oil manometer at a minimum of three
points, approximately representing the range of Ap values in the stack. If, at
each point, the values of Ap as read by the differential pressure gauge and
gauge-oil manometer agree to within 5 percent, the differential pressure gauge
shall be considered to be in proper calibration. Otherwise, the test series
shall either be voided, or procedures to adjust the measured Ap values and final
results shall be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
2.3 Temperature Gauge. A thermocouple, liquid-filled bulb thermometer,
bimetallic thermometer, mercury-in-glass thermometer, or other gauge capable of
measuring temperature to within 1.5 percent of the minimum absolute stack
temperature. The temperature gauge shall be attached to the pitot tube such that
the sensor tip does not touch any metal; the gauge shall be in an interference-
free arrangement with respect to the pitot tube face openings (see Figure 2-1 and
also Figure 2-7 in Section 4). Alternative positions may be used if the pitot
tube-temperature gauge system is calibrated according to the procedure of Section
4. Provided that a difference of not more than 1 percent in the average velocity
measurement is introduced, the temperature gauge need not be attached to the
pitot tube; this alternative is subject to the approval of the Administrator.
2.4 Pressure Probe and Gauge. A piezometer tube and mercury- or water-filled
U-tube manometer capable of measuring stack pressure to within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.)
Hg. The static tap of a standard type pitot tube or one leg of a Type S pitot
tube with the face opening planes positioned parallel to the gas flow may also
be used as the pressure probe.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 4
2.5 Barometer. A mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring
atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg. See NOTE in Method 5,
Section 2.1.9.
2.6 Gas Density Determination Equipment. Method 3 equipment, if needed (see
Section 3.6), to determine the stack gas dry molecular weight, and Reference
Method 4 or Method 5 equipment for moisture content determination; other methods
may be used subject to approval of the Administrator.
2.7 Calibration Pi tot Tube. When calibration of the Type S pitot tube is
necessary (see Section 4), a standard pitot tube for a reference. The standard
pitot tube shall, preferably, have a known coefficient, obtained either (1)
directly from the National Bureau of Standards, Route 70 S, Quince Orchard Road,
Gaithersburg, Maryland, or (2) by calibration against another standard pitot tube
with an NBS-traceable coefficient. Alternatively, a standard pitot tube designed
according to the criteria given in Sections 2.7.1 through 2.7.5 below and
illustrated in Figure 2-4 (see also Citations 7, 8, and 17 in the Bibliography)
may be used. Pitot tubes designed according to these specifications will have
baseline coefficients of about 0.99 + 0.01.
2.7.1 Hemispherical (shown in Figure 2-4) ellipsoidal, or conical tip.
2.7.2 A minimum of six diameters straight run (based upon D, the external
diameter of the tube) between the tip and the static pressure holes.
2.7.3 A minimum of eight diameters straight run between the static pressure
holes and the centerline of the external tube, following the 90-degree bend.
2.7.4 Static pressure holes of equal size (approximately 0.1 D) , equally spaced
in a piezometer ring configuration.
2.7.5 Ninety-degree bend, with curved or mitered junction.
2.8 Differential Pressure Gauge for Type S Pitot Tube Calibration. An inclined
manometer or equivalent. If the single-velocity calibration technique is
employed (see Section 4.1.2.3), the calibration differential pressure gauge shall
be readable to the nearest 0.13 mm (0.005 in.) H20. For multivelocity
calibrations, the gauge shall be readable to the nearest 0.13 mm (0.005 in.) H20
for Ap values between 1.3 and 25 mm (0.05 and 1.0 in.) H20, and to the nearest
1.3 mm (0.05 in.) H20 for Ap values above 25 mm (1.0 in.) H20. A special, more
sensitive gauge will be required to read Ap values below 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) H20
(see Citation 18 in the Bibliography).
3. PROCEDURE
3.1 Set up the apparatus as shown in Figure 2-1. Capillary tubing or surge
tanks installed between the manometer and pitot tube may be used to dampen Ap
fluctuations. It is recommended, but not required, that a pretest leak-check be
conducted as follows: (1) blow through the pitot impact opening until at least
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 5
7.6 cm (3 in.) H20 velocity pressure registers on the manometer; then, close off
the impact opening. The pressure shall remain stable for at least 15 seconds;
(2) do the same for the static pressure side, except using suction to obtain the
minimum of 7.6 cm (3 in.) H20. Other leak-check procedures, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, may be used.
3.2 Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level and zero may
drift due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks during the
traverse. Record all necessary data as shown in the example data sheet
(Figure 2-5) .
3.3 Measure the velocity head and temperature at the traverse points specified
by Method 1. Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge is being used
for the range of Ap values encountered (see Section 2.2). If it is necessary to
change to a more sensitive gauge, do so, and remeasure the Ap and temperature
readings at each traverse point. Conduct a post-test leak-check (mandatory), as
described in Section 3.1 above, to validate the traverse run.
3.4 Measure the static pressure in the stack. One reading is usually adequate.
3.5 Determine the atmospheric pressure.
3.6 Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight. For combustion processes or
processes that emit essentially C02, 02, CO, and N2, use Method 3. For processes
emitting essentially air, an analysis need not be conducted; use a dry molecular
weight of 2 9.0. For other processes, other methods, subject to the approval of
the Administrator, must be used.
3.7 Obtain the moisture content from Reference Method 4 (or equivalent) or from
Method 5.
3.8 Determine the cross-sectional area of the stack or duct at the sampling
location. Whenever possible, physically measure the stack dimensions rather than
using blueprints.
4. CALIBRATION
4.1 Type S Pitot Tube. Before its initial use, carefully examine the Type S
pitot tube in top, side, and end views to verify that the face openings of the
tube are aligned within the specifications illustrated in Figure 2-2 or 2-3. The
pitot tube shall not be used if it fails to meet these alignment specifications.
After verifying the face opening alignment, measure and record the following
dimensions of the pitot tube: (a) the external tubing diameter (dimension Dt,
Figure 2-2b); and (b) the base-to-opening plane distances (dimensions PA and PB,
Figure 2-2b). If Dt is between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 in.), and if $
and PB are equal and between 1.05 and 1.50 Q , there are two possible options:
(1) the pitot tube may be calibrated according to the procedure outlined in
Sections 4.1.2 through 4.1.5 below, or (2) a baseline (isolated tube) coefficient
value of 0.84 may be assigned to the pitot tube. Note, however, that if the
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 6
pitot tube is part of an assembly, calibration may still be required, despite
knowledge of the baseline coefficient value (see Section 4.1.1).
If Dt, , and £ are outside the specified limits, the pitot tube must be
calibrated as outlined in Sections 4.1.2 through 4.1.5 below.
4.1.1 Type S Pitot Tube Assemblies. During sample and velocity traverses, the
isolated Type S pitot tube is not always used; in many instances, the pitot tube
is used in combination with other source-sampling components (thermocouple,
sampling probe, nozzle) as part of an "assembly." The presence of other sampling
components can sometimes affect the baseline value of the Type S pitot tube
coefficient (Citation 9 in the Bibliography); therefore an assigned (or otherwise
known) baseline coefficient value may or may not be valid for a given assembly.
The baseline and assembly coefficient values will be identical only when the
relative placement of the components in the assembly is such that aerodynamic
interference effects are eliminated. Figures 2-6 through 2-8 illustrate
interference-free component arrangements for Type S pitot tubes having external
tubing diameters between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 in.). Type S pitot tube
assemblies that fail to meet any or all of the specifications of Figures 2-6
through 2-8 shall be calibrated according to the procedure outlined in Sections
4.1.2 through 4.1.5 below, and prior to calibration, the values of the
intercomponent spacings (pitot-nozzle, pitot-thermocouple, pitot-probe sheath)
shall be measured and recorded.
NOTE: Do not use any Type S pitot tube assembly which is constructed such that
the impact pressure opening plane of the pitot tube is below the entry plane of
the nozzle (see Figure 2-6B).
4.1.2 Calibration Setup. If the Type S pitot tube is to be calibrated, one leg
of the tube shall be permanently marked A, and the other, B. Calibration shall
be done in a flow system having the following essential design features:
4.1.2.1 The flowing gas stream must be confined to a duct of definite cross-
sectional area, either circular or rectangular. For circular cross sections, the
minimum duct diameter shall be 30.5 cm (12 in.); for rectangular cross sections,
the width (shorter side) shall be at least 2 5.4 cm (10 in.).
4.1.2.2 The cross-sectional area of the calibration duct must be constant over
a distance of 10 or more duct diameters. For a rectangular cross section, use
an equivalent diameter, calculated from the following equation, to determine the
number of duct diameters:
2LW
D
e
(L + W)
Eq. 2-1
Where:
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 7
L
W
Equivalent diameter.
Length.
Width.
To ensure the presence of stable, fully developed flow patterns at the
calibration site, or "test section," the site must be located at least eight
diameters downstream and two diameters upstream from the nearest disturbances.
NOTE: The eight- and two-diameter criteria are not absolute; other test section
locations may be used (subject to approval of the Administrator), provided that
the flow at the test site is stable and demonstrably parallel to the duct axis.
4.1.2.3 The flow system shall have the capacity to generate a test-section
velocity around 915 m/min (3,000 ft/min). This velocity must be constant with
time to guarantee steady flow during calibration. Note that Type S pitot tube
coefficients obtained by single-velocity calibration at 915 m/min (3,000 ft/min)
will generally be valid to ±3 percent for the measurement of velocities above 305
m/min (1,000 ft/min) and to ±5 to 6 percent for the measurement of velocities
between 180 and 305 m/min (600 and 1,000 ft/min). If a more precise correlation
between Cp and velocity is desired, the flow system shall have the capacity to
generate at least four distinct, time-invariant test-section velocities covering
the velocity range from 180 to 1,525 m/min (600 to 5,000 ft/min), and calibration
data shall be taken at regular velocity intervals over this range (see Citations
9 and 14 in the Bibliography for details).
4.1.2.4 Two entry ports, one each for the standard and Type S pitot tubes, shall
be cut in the test section; the standard pitot entry port shall be located
slightly downstream of the Type S port, so that the standard and Type S impact
openings will lie in the same cross-sectional plane during calibration. To
facilitate alignment of the pitot tubes during calibration, it is advisable that
the test section be constructed of plexiglas or some other transparent material.
4.1.3 Calibration Procedure. Note that this procedure is a general one and must
not be used without first referring to the special considerations presented in
Section 4.1.5. Note also that this procedure applies only to single-velocity
calibration. To obtain calibration data for the A and B sides of the Type S
pitot tube, proceed as follows:
4.1.3.1 Make sure that the manometer is properly filled and that the oil is free
from contamination and is of the proper density. Inspect and leak-check all
pitot lines; repair or replace if necessary.
4.1.3.2 Level and zero the manometer. Turn on the fan, and allow the flow to
stabilize. Seal the Type S entry port.
4.1.3.3 Ensure that the manometer is level and zeroed. Position the standard
pitot tube at the calibration point (determined as outlined in Section 4.1.5.1),
and align the tube so that its tip is pointed directly into the flow. Particular
care should be taken in aligning the tube to avoid yaw and pitch angles. Make
sure that the entry port surrounding the tube is properly sealed.
-------
EMTIC TM-0 02
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 8
4.1.3.4 Read Apscd, and record its value in a data table similar to the one shown
in Figure 2-9. Remove the standard pitot tube from the duct, and disconnect it
from the manometer. Seal the standard entry port.
4.1.3.5 Connect the Type S pitot tube to the manometer. Open the Type S entry
port. Check the manometer level and zero. Insert and align the Type S pitot
tube so that its A side impact opening is at the same point as was the standard
pitot tube and is pointed directly into the flow. Make sure that the entry port
surrounding the tube is properly sealed.
4.1.3.6 Read Aps, and enter its value in the data table. Remove the Type S
pitot tube from the duct, and disconnect it from the manometer.
4.1.3.7 Repeat Steps 4.1.3.3 through 4.1.3.6 above until three pairs of Ap
readings have been obtained.
4.1.3.8 Repeat Steps 4.1.3.3 through 4.1.3.7 above for the B side of the Type
S pitot tube.
4.1.3.9 Perform calculations, as described in Section 4.1.4 below.
4.1.4 Calculations.
4.1.4.1 For each of the six pairs of Ap readings (i.e., three from side A and
three from side B) obtained in Section 4.1.3 above, calculate the value of
the Type S pitot tube coefficient as follows:
C = C
PCs) p(std)
AP
std
Eq. 2-2
Where:
Cp(0l = Type S pitot tube coefficient.
Cp(scdl = Standard pitot tube coefficient; use 0.99 if the
coefficient is unknown and the tube is designed according
to the criteria of Sections 2.7.1 to 2.7.5 of this
method.
Apscd = Velocity head measured by the standard pitot tube, cm
(in.) H20.
Ap„ = Velocity head measured by the Type S pitot tube, cm (in.)
H20.
4.1.4.2 Calculate Cp (side A), the mean A-side coefficient, and Cp (side B) , the
:KT-
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 9
mean B-side coefficient; calculate the difference between these two average
values.
4.1.4.3 Calculate the deviation of each of the three A-side values of
Cpls) from Cp (side A) , and the deviation of each B-side values of Cpl!!) from
Cp (side B). Use the following equation:
Deviation = C -C (A or B)
p,„ p
Eq. 2-3
4.1.4.4 Calculate a, the average deviation from the mean, for both the A and B
sides of the pitot tube. Use the following equation:
3
- v* <»• B'l
o(side A or B) = —
3
Eq. 2-4
4.1.4.5 Use the Type S pitot tube only if the values of a (side A) and a (side
B) are less than or equal to 0.01 and if the absolute value of the difference
between Cp (A) and Cp (B) is 0.01 or less.
4.1.5 Special Considerations.
4.1.5.1 Selection of Calibration Point.
4.1.5.1.1 When an isolated Type S pitot tube is calibrated, select a calibration
point at or near the center of the duct, and follow the procedures outlined in
Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 above. The Type S pitot coefficients so obtained,
i.e., Cp (side A) and 9 (side B) , will be valid, so long as either: (l) the
isolated pitot tube is used; or (2) the pitot tube is used with other components
(nozzle, thermocouple, sample probe) in an arrangement that is free from
aerodynamic interference effects (see Figures 2-6 through 2-8).
4.1.5.1.2 For Type S pitot tube-thermocouple combinations (without sample
probe), select a calibration point at or near the center of the duct, and follow
the procedures outlined in Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 above. The coefficients so
obtained will be valid so long as the pitot tube-thermocouple combination is used
by itself or with other components in an interference-free arrangement (Figures
2-6 and 2-8).
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 10
4.1.5.1.3 For assemblies with sample probes, the calibration point should be
located at or near the center of the duct; however, insertion of a probe sheath
into a small duct may cause significant cross-sectional area blockage and yield
incorrect coefficient values (Citation 9 in the Bibliography). Therefore, to
minimize the blockage effect, the calibration point may be a few inches off-
center if necessary. The actual blockage effect will be negligible when the
theoretical blockage, as determined by a projected-area model of the probe
sheath, is 2 percent or less of the duct cross-sectional area for assemblies
without external sheaths (Figure 2-10a), and 3 percent or less for assemblies
with external sheaths (Figure 2-10b).
4.1.5.2 For those probe assemblies in which pitot tube-nozzle interference is
a factor (i.e., those in which the pitot-nozzle separation distance fails to meet
the specification illustrated in Figure 2-6A) , the value of Cp(sl depends upon the
amount of free-space between the tube and nozzle, and therefore is a function of
nozzle size. In these instances, separate calibrations shall be performed with
each of the commonly used nozzle sizes in place. Note that the single-velocity
calibration technique is acceptable for this purpose, even though the larger
nozzle sizes (>0.635 cm or 1/4 in.) are not ordinarily used for isokinetic
sampling at velocities around 915 m/min (3,000 ft/min), which is the calibration
velocity; note also that it is not necessary to draw an isokinetic sample during
calibration (see Citation 19 in the Bibliography).
4.1.5.3 For a probe assembly constructed such that its pitot tube is always used
in the same orientation, only one side of the pitot tube need be calibrated (the
side which will face the flow). The pitot tube must still meet the alignment
specifications of Figure 2-2 or 2-3, however, and must have an average deviation
(a) value of 0.01 or less (see Section 4.1.4.4.)
4.1.6 Field Use and Recalibration.
4.1.6.1 Field Use.
4.1.6.1.1 When a Type S pitot tube (isolated or in an assembly) is used in the
field, the appropriate coefficient value (whether assigned or obtained by
calibration) shall be used to perform velocity calculations. For calibrated Type
S pitot tubes, the A side coefficient shall be used when the A side of the tube
faces the flow, and the B side coefficient shall be used when the B side faces
the flow; alternatively, the arithmetic average of the A and B side coefficient
values may be used, irrespective of which side faces the flow.
4.1.6.1.2 When a probe assembly is used to sample a small duct, 30.5 to 91.4 cm
(12 to 36 in.) in diameter, the probe sheath sometimes blocks a significant part
of the duct cross-section, causing a reduction in the effective value of Cp(a).
Consult Citation 9 in the Bibliography for details. Conventional pitot-sampling
probe assemblies are not recommended for use in ducts having inside diameters
smaller than 30.5 cm. (12 in.) (see Citation 16 in the Bibliography).
4.1.6.2 Recalibration.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 11
4.1.6.2.1 Isolated Pitot Tubes. After each field use, the pitot tube shall be
carefully reexamined in top, side, and end views. If the pitot face openings are
still aligned within the specifications illustrated in Figure 2-2 or 2-3, it can
be assumed that the baseline coefficient of the pitot tube has not changed. If,
however, the tube has been damaged to the extent that it no longer meets the
specifications of the Figure 2-2 or 2-3, the damage shall either be repaired to
restore proper alignment of the face openings, or the tube shall be discarded.
4.1.6.2.2 Pitot Tube Assemblies. After each field use, check the face opening
alignment of the pitot tube, as in Section 4.1.6.2.1; also, remeasure the
intercomponent spacings of the assembly. If the intercomponent spacings have not
changed and the face opening alignment is acceptable, it can be assumed that the
coefficient of the assembly has not changed. If the face opening alignment is
no longer within the specifications of Figure 2-2 or 2-3, either repair the
damage or replace the pitot tube (calibrating the new assembly, if necessary).
If the intercomponent spacings have changed, restore the original spacings, or
recalibrate the assembly.
4.2 Standard Pitot Tube (if applicable) . If a standard pitot tube is used for
the velocity traverse, the tube shall be constructed according to the criteria
of Section 2.7 and shall be assigned a baseline coefficient value of 0.99. If
the standard pitot tube is used as part of an assembly, the tube shall be in an
interference-free arrangement (subject to the approval of the Administrator).
4.3 Temperature Gauges. After each field use, calibrate dial thermometers,
liquid-filled bulb thermometers, thermocouple-potentiometer systems, and other
gauges at a temperature within 10 percent of the average absolute stack
temperature. For temperatures up to 405°C (761°F) , use an ASTM mercury-in-glass
reference thermometer, or equivalent, as a reference,- alternatively, either
a reference thermocouple and potentiometer (calibrated by NBS) or thermometric
fixed points, e.g., ice bath and boiling water (corrected for barometric
pressure) may be used. For temperatures above 405°C (761°F) , use an NBS-
calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or an alternative
reference, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
If, during calibration, the absolute temperature measured with the gauge being
calibrated and the reference gauge agree within 1.5 percent, the temperature data
taken in the field shall be considered valid. Otherwise, the pollutant emission
test shall either be considered invalid or adjustments (if appropriate) of the
test results shall be made, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
4.4 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer used against a mercury barometer.
5. CALCULATIONS
Carry out calculations, retaining at least one extra decimal figure beyond that
of the acquired data. Round off figures after final calculation.
5.1 Nomenclature.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 12
A
Bw
Kp
Cross-sectional area of stack, m2 (ft2) .
Water vapor in the gas stream (from Method 5 or Reference
Method 4), proportion by volume.
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Pitot tube constant,
34.97
m
sec
(g/g -mol e) (mmHg)
( K) (mmH20)
1/2
for the metric system.
85.49
ft
sec
lb/lb-sole) (1n.Hg)
(°R) (1n.H20)
1/2
for the English system.
Md
M.
Molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (see Section 3.6),
g/g—mole (lb/lb-mole).
Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis, g/g-mole (lb/lb-
mole) .
= M (1 -B ) + 18.OB
d tfS VS
^bar
p9
p.
Eq. 2-5
Barometric pressure at measurement site, mm Hg (in. Hg)
Stack static pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Absolute stack pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg),
= P„ + P
bar g
^std
Qsd
Eq. 2-6
Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (2 9.92 in. Hg) .
Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to standard
conditions, dsm3/hr (dscf/hr).
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSFS TEST METHOD
Page 13
tB = Stack temperature, °C (°F).
Ts = Absolute stack temperature, °K (°R)
for metric.
= 273 + t
s
Eq. 2-7
- 460 + t
s
Eq. 2-8
for English.
Tscd = Standard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R) .
vs = Average stack gas velocity, m/sec (ft/sec).
Ap = Velocity head of stack gas, mm H20 (in. H20) .
3,600= Conversion factor, sec/hr.
18.0 = Molecular weight of water, g/g-mole (lb/lb-mole).
5.2 Averaga Stack Gas Velocity.
v = K C (.ft*p)
s P P " »V9.
TS (avg)
P H
s s
Eq. 2-9
5.3 Average Stack Gas Dry Volumetric Flow Rate.
Q = 3 , 600 (1 -B ) v A — —L-
sd MS S J p
sCavg) std
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Eq. 2-10
1. Mark, L.S. Mechanical Engineers' Handbook. New York. McGraw-Hill Book
Co., Inc. 1951.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 14
2. Perry. J.H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook. New York. McGraw-Hill Book
Co., Inc. 1960 .
3. Shigehara, R.T., W.F. Todd, and W.S. Smith. Significance of Errors in
Stack Sampling Measurements. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, N.C. (Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Air
Pollution Control Association, St. Louis, MO., June 14-19, 1970).
4. Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for Particulate Matter. In: 1971 Book
of ASTM Standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, PA. 1971. ASTM Designation
D 2928-71.
5. Vermard, J.K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics. New York. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc. 1947.
6. Fluid Meters - Their Theory and Application. American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y. 1959.
7. ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. 1972. p. 208.
8. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 26. 1974. p. 648.
9. Vollaro, R.F. Guidelines for Type S Pitot Tube Calibration. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (Presented
at 1st Annual Meeting, Source Evaluation Society, Dayton, OH,
September 18, 1975.)
10. Vollaro, R.F. A Type S Pitot Tube Calibration Study. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park,
N.C. July 1974.
11. Vollaro, R.F. The Effects of Impact Opening Misalignment on the Value of
the Type S Pitot Tube Coefficient. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC. October 1976.
12. Vollaro, R.F. Establishment of a Baseline Coefficient Value for Properly
Constructed Type S Pitot Tubes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC. November 1976.
13. Vollaro, R.F. An Evaluation of Single-Velocity Calibration Technique as a
Means of Determining Type S Pitot Tube Coefficients. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC.
August 1975.
14. Vollaro, R.F. The Use of Type S Pitot Tubes for the Measurement of Low
Velocities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Measurement
Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC. November 1976.
15. Smith, Marvin L. Velocity Calibration of EPA Type Source Sampling Probe.
United Technologies Corporation, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Division, East
3»
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 15
Hartford, CT. 1975.
16. Vollaro, R.F. Recommended Procedure for Sample Traverses in Ducts Smaller
than 12 Inches in Diameter. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission
Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC. November 1976.
17. Ower, E. and R.C. Pankhurst. The Measurement of Air Flow, 4th Ed. London,
Pergamon Press. 1966.
18. Vollaro, R.F. A Survey of Commercially Available Instrumentation for the
Measurement of Low-Range Gas Velocities. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC.
November 1976. (Unpublished Paper).
19. Gnyp, A.W., C.C. St. Pierre, D.S. Smith, D. Mozzon, and J. Steiner. An
Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Pitot Tube-Sampling Probe
Configurations on the Magnitude of the S Type Pitot Tube Coefficient for
Commercially Available Source Sampling Probes. Prepared by the University
of Windsor for the Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Canada.
February 1975.
-------
EMTIC TM-002 NSPS TEST METHOD Page 16
1.&0-2.M cm*
(0.75 « 10 in.)
-CI
7.62 cm (3 In.)'
Temperature Senior
1 L
7 L
Type S Pitot Tube
* Suggested (Interference Free)
Pltot tube/Thermocouple 8peeing
Leak-Free Connection*
Figure 2-1. Type S pitot tube manometer assembly.
-------
EMTIO TM-002 NSPS TEST METHOD Page 17
Transversa
Tub* Axis
Face
Opening »
Planes 1
I
(•)
A-Slde Plane
Longitudinal
Tube Axis
' Note;
K \
a y
I 1.05 Dt<
p i
_B f
PA" PB
B-SWe Plane
(b)
_ ~)j A~af-B -C~~)
(0
(a) end view; face opening planes perpendlculer
to transverse axis;
(b) top view; face opening planes parallel to
longitudinal axis;
(c) side view; both legs of equal length end
eenterlines coincident when viewed from
both sides. Baseline coefficient vslues of
0.M mey be assigned to pilot tubes con-
structed this way
Figure 2-2. Properly constructed Type S pi tot tube.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 18
Figure 2-3. Types of face-opening misalignment that can result from field use
or improper construction of Type S pitot tubes. These will not affect the
baseline value of Cp(s) so long as a1 and a2 £10°( 3l and 32 s5°, z £0.32 cm (1/8
in.) and w £0.08 cm (1/32 in.) (citation 11 in Bibliography).
3S-3-
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 19
Curved or
Mttarad Junction
Static
Hotoi
(-0.1 D)
Figure 2-4. Standard pitot tube design specifications.
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 2 0
^<1
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 21
PLANT
DATE RUN NO. STACK DIA. OR
DIMENSIONS, m (in.) BAROMETRIC PRESS., mm Hg
(in. Hg) CROSS SECTIONAL AREA, m2 (ft2)
OPERATORS
PITOT TUBE I.D. NO.
AVG. COEFFICIENT, Cp =
LAST DATE CALIBRATED
SCHEMATIC OF STACK
CROSS SECTION
Traverse
Pt. No.
Vel. Hd., Ap
mm (in.) H20
Stack Temperature
P3
mm Hg
(in.Hg)
(aP)1/2
T„
°C (°F)
T„
°K (°R)
Average
Figure 2-5. Velocity traverse data.
3kO
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 22
Type S Pilot Tub*
(Kh)
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 23
Tainparature Senear
_ '
I* (H h )
Temperature Saneor
Jd, TypcSPKotTute HTD S__ j P, Typ« S PWol Tube
I OR
Sample Probe
Figure 2-7. Proper thermocouple placement to prevent interference; Dt
between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 in.).
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 24
/S | D, Typ» S Pilot Tub*
Sample Probe
V 17 12 em {) la.)
Figure 2-8. Minimum pi tot-sample probe separation needed to prevent
interference; Dt between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 in.).
3&3>
-------
EMTIC TM-002
NSPS TEST METHOD
Page 25
PITOT TUBE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: DATE: CALIBRATED BY:
"A" SIDE CALIBRATION
RUN NO.
APscd
cm H20
(in HjO)
aP(b)
cm H20
(in H20)
Deviation
Cpis) ~ Cp (A)
1
2
3
c
^p, avg
(SIDE A)
"B" SIDE CALIBRATION
RUN NO.
cm H20
(in H20)
AP(s)
cm H20
(in H20)
Cp(s)
Deviation
Cp(s) " Cp(B)
1
2
3
r
^P.avg
(SIDE B)
Average Devi ati on =q
(AorB)
1 =1
pts)
p(A or B)
Must Be ^0.01
C (SideA) -C (S1deB)
p p
Must Be ^0.01
If-f
-------
EMTIC TM-002 NSPS TEST METHOD Page 26
Figure 2-9. Pitot tube calibration data.
3<«<"
-------
EMTIC TM-002 NSPS TEST METHOD Page 27
=d
t too
Duct Area
=d
w
Figure 2-10. Projected-area models for typical pitot tube assemblies.
30=
-------
METHOD 315
K^r
-------
APPENDIX A TO PART 63--TEST METHODS
*****
METHOD 315 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE
EXTRACTABLE MATTER CMCEM) FROM SELECTED SOURCES
AT PRIMARY ALUMINUM PRODUCTION FACILITIES
NOTE: This method does not include all of the specifications (e.g., equipment and supplies) and
procedures (e.g., sampling and analytical) essential to its performance. Some material is incorporated by
reference from other methods in this part. Therefore, to obtain reliable results, persons using this method
should have a thorough knowledge of at least the following additional test methods: Method 1, Method
2, Method 3, and Method 5 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
1.0 Scope and Application.
1.1 Analytes. Particulate matter (PM). No CAS number assigned. Methylene chloride
extractable matter (MCEM). No CAS number assigned.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for the simultaneous determination of PM and
MCEM when specified in an applicable regulation. This method was developed by consensus with the
Aluminum Association and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has limited precision
estimates for MCEM; it should have similar precision to Method 5 for PM in 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A since the procedures are similar for PM.
1.3 Data quality objectives. Adherence to the requirements of this method will enhance the
quality of the data obtained from air pollutant sampling methods.
2.0 Summary of Method.
Particulate matter and MCEM are withdrawn isokinetically from the source. PM is collected on
a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F) or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a
particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses on the probe and is
subsequently removed in an acetone rinse or on the filter at or above the filtration temperature, is
determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. MCEM is then determined by adding a
methylene chloride rinse of the probe and filter holder, extracting the condensable hydrocarbons
collected in the impinger water, adding an acetone rinse followed by a methylene chloride rinse of the
sampling train components after the filter and before the silica gel impinger, and determining residue
gravimetrically after evaporating the solvents.
3.0 Definitions. [Reserved]
4.0 Interferences. [Reserved]
5.0 Safety.
This method may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This method does not
purport to address all of the safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of
this method to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to performing this test method.
6.0 Equipment and Supplies.
NOTE: Mention of trade names or specific products does not constitute endorsement by the
EPA.
6.1 Sample collection. The following items are required for sample collection:
6.1.1 Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown in Figure
5-1, Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Complete construction details are given in APTD-0581
(Reference 2 in section 17.0 of this method); commercial models of this train are also available. For
changes from APTD-0581 and for allowable modifications of the train shown in Figure 5-1, Method 5,40
CFR part 60, appendix, A see the following subsections.
NOTE: The operating and maintenance procedures for the sampling train are described in
APTD-0576 (Reference 3 in section 17.0 of this method). Since correct usage is important in obtaining
valid results, all users should read APTD-0576 and adopt the operating and maintenance procedures
-------
outlined in it, unless otherwise specified herein. The use of grease for sealing sampling train components
is not recommended because many greases are soluble in methylene chloride. The sampling train
consists of the following components:
6.1.1.1 Probe nozzle. Glass or glass lined with sharp, tapered leading edge. The angle of taper
shall be <30°, and the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe
nozzle shall be of the button-hook or elbow design, unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.
Other materials of construction may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. A range of
nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical nozzle sizes range from 0.32 to
1.27 cm (1/8 to 1/2 in.) inside diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (1/16 in.). Larger nozzle sizes are
also available if higher volume sampling trains are used. Each nozzle shall be calibrated according to the
procedures outlined in section 10.0 of this method.
6.1.1.2 Probe liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable of
maintaining a probe gas temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F), or such
other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator
for a particular application. Because the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually
monitored during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581 and using the calibration curves
of APTD-0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-0576) will be considered
acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to
about 480°C (900°F); quartz liners shall be used for temperatures between 480 and 900°C (900 and
1,650°F). Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified for short periods of
time, subject to the approval of the Administrator. The softening temperature for borosilicate glass is
820°C (1,500°F) and for quartz glass it is 1,500°C (2,700°F).
6.1.1.3 Pitot tube. Type S, as described in section 6.1 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A,
or other device approved by the Administrator. The pitot tube shall be attached to the probe (as shown in
Figure 5-1 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A) to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas
velocity. The impact (high pressure) opening plane of the pitot tube shall be even with or above the
nozzle entry plane (see Method 2, Figure 2-6b, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A) during sampling. The Type
S pitot tube assembly shall have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in section 10.0 of Method 2,
40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
6.1.1.4 Differential pressure gauge. Inclined manometer or equivalent device (two), as described
in section 6.2 of Method 2, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. One manometer shall be used for velocity head
(Dp) readings, and the other, for orifice differential pressure readings.
6.1.1.5 Filter holder. Borosilicate glass, with a glass frit filter support and a silicone rubber
gasket. The holder design shall provide a positive seal against leakage from the outside or around the
filter. The holder shall be attached immediately at the outlet of the probe (or cyclone, if used).
6.1.1.6 Filter heating system. Any heating system capable of maintaining a temperature around
the filter holder of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F) during sampling, or such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular application.
Alternatively, the tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that specified. A
temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to within 3°C (5.4°F) shall be installed so that the
temperature around the filter holder can be regulated and monitored during sampling. Heating systems
other than the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.
6.1.1.7 Temperature sensor. A temperature sensor capable of measuring temperature to within
±3°C (5.4°F) shall be installed so that the sensing tip of the temperature sensor is in direct contact with
the sample gas, and the temperature around the filter holder can be regulated and monitored during
sampling.
6.1.1.8 Condenser. The following system shall be used to determine the stack gas moisture
content: four glass impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings. The first, third,
and fourth impingers shall be of the Greenburg-Smith design, modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3 cm
(1/2 in.) ID glass tube extending to about 1.3 cm (1/2 in.) from the bottom of the flask. The second
-------
impinger shall be of the Greenburg-Smith design with the standard tip. The first and second impingers
shall contain known quantities of water (section 8.3.1 of this method), the third shall be empty, and the
fourth shall contain a known weight of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. A temperature sensor capable
of measuring temperature to within PC (2°F) shall be placed at the outlet of the fourth impinger for
monitoring.
6.1.1.9 Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, temperature sensors capable of
measuring temperature to within 3°C (5.4°F), dry gas meter (DGM) capable of measuring volume to
within 2 percent, and related equipment, as shown in Figure 5-1 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix
A. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of
determining sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. When the metering system is used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow
periodic checks of isokinetic rates.
6.1.1.10 Sampling trains using metering systems designed for higher flow rates than that
described in APTD-0581 or APTD-0576 may be used provided that the specifications of this method are
met.
6.1.2 Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring atmospheric
pressure to within 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) Hg.
NOTE: The barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby National Weather Service
station. In this case, the station value (which is the absolute barometric pressure) shall be requested and
an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and sampling point shall be made at
a rate of minus 2.5 mm (0.1 in) Hg per 30 m (100 ft) elevation increase or plus 2.5 mm (0.1 in) Hg per 30
m (100 ft) elevation decrease.
6.1.3 Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge, as
described in sections 6.3 and 6.4 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A, and gas analyzer, if
necessary, as described in Method 3,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. The temperature sensor shall,
preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or sampling probe in a fixed configuration, such that
the tip of the sensor extends beyond the leading edge of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal.
Alternatively, the sensor may be attached just prior to use in the field. Note, however, that if the
temperature sensor is attached in the field, the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement
with respect to the Type S pitot tube openings (see Method 2, Figure 2-4,40 CFR part 60, appendix A).
As a second alternative, if a difference of not more than 1 percent in the average velocity measurement is
to be introduced, the temperature sensor need not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. (This alternative
is subject to the approval of the Administrator.)
6.2 Sample recovery. The following items are required for sample recovery:
6.2.1 Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon or Teflon® bristle brushes with stainless
steel wire handles. The probe brush shall have extensions (at least as long as the probe) constructed of
stainless steel, nylon, Teflon®, or similarly inert material. The brushes shall be properly sized and
shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.
6.2.2 Wash bottles. Glass wash bottles are recommended. Polyethylene or tetrafluoroethylene
(TFE) wash bottles may be used, but they may introduce a positive bias due to contamination from the
bottle. It is recommended that acetone not be stored in polyethylene or TFE bottles for longer than a
month.
6.2.3 Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass bottles, for
acetone and methylene chloride washes and impinger water, 500 ml or 1,000 ml. Screw-cap liners shall
either be rubber-backed Teflon® or shall be constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant to chemical
attack by acetone or methylene chloride. (Narrow-mouth glass bottles have been found to be less prone
to leakage.) Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.
6.2.4 Petri dishes. For filter samples, glass, unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.
6.2.5 Graduated cylinder and/or balance. To measure condensed water, acetone wash and
methylene chloride wash used during field recovery of the samples, to within 1 ml or 1 g. Graduated
cylinders shall have subdivisions no greater than 2 ml. Most laboratory balances are capable of weighing
llo
-------
to the nearest 0.5 g or less. Any such balance is suitable for use here and in section 6.3.4 of this method.
6.2.6 Plastic storage containers. Air-tight containers to store silica gel.
6.2.7 Funnel and rubber policeman. To aid in transfer of silica gel to container; not necessary if
silica gel is weighed in the field.
6.2.8 Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.
6.3 Sample analysis. The following equipment is required for sample analysis:
6.3.1 Glass or Teflon® weighing dishes.
6.3.2 Desiccator. It is recommended that fresh desiccant be used to minimize the chance for
positive bias due to absorption of organic material during drying.
6.3.3 Analytical balance. To measure to within 0.1 mg.
6.3.4 Balance. To measure to within 0.5 g.
6.3.5 Beakers. 250 ml.
6.3.6 Hygrometer. To measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.
6.3.7 Temperature sensor. To measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.
6.3.8 Buchner fritted funnel. 30 ml size, fine (<50 micron)-porosity fritted glass.
6.3.9 Pressure filtration apparatus.
6.3.10 Aluminum dish. Flat bottom, smooth sides, and flanged top, 18 mm deep and with an
inside diameter of approximately 60 mm.
7.0 Reagents and Standards.
7.1 Sample collection. The following reagents are required for sample collection:
7.1.1 Filters. Glass fiber filters, without organic binder, exhibiting at least 99.95 percent
efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration) on 0.3 micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. The filter
efficiency test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM Method D 2986-95A (incorporated by
reference in § 63.841 of this part). Test data from the supplier's quality control program are sufficient for
this purpose. In sources containing S02 or S03, the filter material must be of a type that is unreactive to
S02 or S03. Reference 10 in section 17.0 of this method may be used to select the appropriate filter.
7.1.2 Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175°C (350°F) for 2
hours. New silica gel may be used as received. Alternatively, other types of desiccants (equivalent or
better) may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
7.1.3 Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required, deionized
distilled water shall be used. Run blanks prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.
7.1.4 Crushed ice.
7.1.5 Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease. This is not necessary if
screw-on connectors with Teflon® sleeves, or similar, are used. Alternatively, other types of stopcock
grease may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. [Caution: Many stopcock greases are
methylene chloride-soluble. Use sparingly and carefully remove prior to recovery to prevent
contamination of the MCEM analysis.]
7.2 Sample recovery. The following reagents arc required for sample recovery:
7.2.1 Acetone. Acetone with blank values < 1 ppm, by weight residue, is required. Acetone
blanks may be run prior to field use, and only acetone with low blank values may be used. In no case
shall a blank value of greater than 1E-06 of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample
weight.
NOTE: This is more restrictive than Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. At least one
vendor (Supelco Incorporated located in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania) lists <1 mg/1 as residue for its
Environmental Analysis Solvents.
7.2.2 Methylene chloride. Methylene chloride with a blank value <1.5 ppm, by weight, residue.
Methylene chloride blanks may be run prior to field use, and only methylene chloride with low blank
values may be used. In no case shall a blank value of greater than 1.6E-06 of the weight of methylene
chloride used be subtracted from the sample weight.
NOTE: A least one vendor quotes <1 mg/1 for Environmental Analysis Solvents-grade
methylene chloride.
-------
7.3 Sample analysis. The following reagents arc required for sample analysis:
7.3.1 Acetone. Same as in section 7.2.1 of this method.
7.3.2 Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other types of
desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
7.3.3 Methylene chloride. Same as in section 7.2.2 of this method.
8.0 Sample Collection. Preservation. Storage, and Transport.
NOTE: The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable results, testers
should be trained and experienced with the test procedures.
8.1 Pretest preparation. It is suggested that sampling equipment be maintained according to the
procedures described in APTD-0576.
8.1.1 Weigh several 200 g to 300 g portions of silica gel in airtight containers to the nearest 0.5
g. Record on each container the total weight of the silica gel plus container. As an alternative, the silica
gel need not be preweighed but may be weighed directly in its impinger or sampling holder just prior to
train assembly.
8.1.2 A batch of glass fiber filters, no more than 50 at a time, should placed in a soxhlet
extraction apparatus and extracted using methylene chloride for at least 16 hours. After extraction, check
filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, or pinhole leaks. Label the shipping containers
(glass or plastic petri dishes), and keep the filters in these containers at all times except during sampling
and weighing.
8.1.3 Desiccate the filters at 20 ± 5.6°C (68 ± 10°F) and ambient pressure for at least 24 hours
and weigh at intervals of at least 6 hours to a constant weight, i.e., <0.5 mg change from previous
weighing; record results to the nearest 0.1 mg. During each weighing the filter must not be exposed to the
laboratory atmosphere for longer than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50 percent. Alternatively
(unless otherwise specified by the Administrator), the filters may be oven-dried at 104°C (220°F) for 2 to
3 hours, desiccated for 2 hours, and weighed. Procedures other than those described, which account for
relative humidity effects, may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
8.2 Preliminary determinations.
8.2.1 Select the sampling site and the minimum number of sampling points according to Method
1,40 CFR part 60, appendix A or as specified by the Administrator. Determine the stack pressure,
temperature, and the range of velocity heads using Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A; it is
recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines (see section 8.1 of Method 2, 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A) be performed. Determine the moisture content using Approximation Method 4 (section 1.2 of Method
4,40 CFR part 60, appendix A) or its alternatives to make isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine
the stack gas dry molecular weight, as described in section 8.6 of Method 2, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A;
if integrated Method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight determination, the integrated bag sample
shall be taken simultaneously with, and for the same total length of time as, the particulate sample run.
8.2.2 Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads such that it is not necessary to
change the nozzle size in order to maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the
nozzle size. Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the range of velocity heads
encountered (see section 8.2 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A).
8.2.3 Select a suitable probe liner and probe length such that all traverse points can be sampled.
For large stacks, consider sampling from opposite sides of the stack to reduce the required probe length.
8.2.4 Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum total sampling time
specified in the test procedures for the specific industry such that: (1) The sampling time per point is not
less than 2 minutes (or some greater time interval as specified by the Administrator); and (2) the sample
volume taken (corrected to standard conditions) will exceed the required minimum total gas sample
volume. The latter is based on an approximate average sampling rate.
8.2.5 The sampling time at each point shall be the same. It is recommended that the number of
minutes sampled at each point be an integer or an integer plus one-half minute, in order to eliminate
timekeeping errors.
8.2.6 In some circumstances (e.g., batch cycles), it may be necessary to sample for shorter times
-------
at the traverse points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the Administrator's
approval must first be obtained.
8.3 Preparation of sampling train.
8.3.1 During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, keep all openings where
contamination can occur covered until just prior to assembly or until sampling is about to begin. Place
100 ml of water in each of the first two impingers, leave the third impinger empty, and transfer
approximately 200 to 300 g of preweighed silica gel from its container to the fourth impinger. More
silica gel may be used, but care should be taken to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the
impinger during sampling. Place the container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery.
Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be determined to the nearest 0.5 g and
recorded.
8.3.2 Using a tweezer or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled (identified) and
weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly centered and the gasket properly
placed so as to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing the filter. Check the filter for tears
after assembly is completed.
8.3.3 When glass liners are used, install the selected nozzle using a Viton A 0-ring when stack
temperatures are less than 260°C (500°F) and an asbestos string gasket when temperatures are higher.
See APTD-0576 for details. Mark the probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote
the proper distance into the stack or duct for each sampling point.
8.3.4 Set up the train as in Figure 5-1 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A, using (if
necessary) a very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints, greasing only the outer portion
(see APTD-0576) to avoid possibility of contamination by the silicone grease. Subject to the approval of
the Administrator, a glass cyclone may be used between the probe and filter holder when the total
particulate catch is expected to exceed 100 mg or when water droplets are present in the stack gas.
8.3.5 Place crushed ice around the impingers.
8.4 Leak-check procedures.
8.4.1 Leak check of metering system shown in
Figure 5-1 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. That portion of the sampling train from the pump
to the orifice meter should be leak-checked prior to initial use and after each shipment. Leakage after the
pump will result in less volume being recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is
suggested (see Figure 5-2 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A): Close the main valve on the meter
box. Insert a one-hole rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe.
Disconnect and vent the low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize
the system to 13 to 18 cm (5 to 7 in.) water column by blowing into the rubber tubing. Pinch off the
tubing, and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A loss of pressure on the manometer indicates a leak in
the meter box; leaks, if present, must be corrected.
8.4.2 Pretest leak check. A pretest leak-check is recommended but not required. If the pretest
leak-check is conducted, the following procedure should be used.
8.4.2.1 After the sampling train has been assembled, turn on and set the filter and probe heating
systems to the desired operating temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A
0-ring or other leak-free connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe liner, leak-check
the train at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum.
NOTE: A lower vacuum may be used, provided that it is not exceeded during the test.
8.4.2.2 If an asbestos string is used, do not connect the probe to the train during the leak check.
Instead, leak-check the train by first plugging the inlet to the filter holder (cyclone, if applicable) and
pulling a 380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum. (See NOTE in section 8.4.2.1 of this method). Then connect the
probe to the train and perform the leak check at approximately 25 mm (1 in.) Hg vacuum; alternatively,
the probe may be leak-checked with the rest of the sampling train, in one step, at 380 mm (15 in.) Hg
vacuum. Leakage rates in excess of 4 percent of the average sampling rate or 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm),
whichever is less, are unacceptable.
8.4.2.3 The following leak check instructions for the sampling train described in APTD-0576
-------
and APTD-0581 may be helpful. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse adjust
valve completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass valve until
the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass valve, as this will cause water
to back up into the filter holder. If the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak-check at this higher
vacuum or end the leak check as shown below and start over.
8.4.2.4 When the leak check is completed, first slowly remove the plug from the inlet to the
probe, filter holder, or cyclone (if applicable) and immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents
the water in the impingers from being forced backward into the filter holder and the silica gel from being
entrained backward into the third impinger.
8.4.3 Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component (e.g., filter
assembly or impinger) change becomes necessary, a leak check shall be conducted immediately before
the change is made. The leak check shall be done according to the procedure outlined in section 8.4.2 of
this method, except that it shall be done at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value
recorded up to that point in the test. If the leakage rate is found to be no greater than 0.00057 mVmin
(0.02 cfm) or 4 percent of the average sampling rate (whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no
correction will need to be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered; if, however, a higher leakage
rate is obtained, either record the leakage rate and plan to correct the sample volume as shown in section
12.3 of this method or void the sample run.
NOTE: Immediately after component changes, leak checks are optional; if such leak checks are
done, the procedure outlined in section 8.4.2 of this method should be used.
8.4.4 Post-test leak check. A leak check is mandatory at the conclusion of each sampling run.
The leak check shall be performed in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 8.4.2 of this
method, except that it shall be conducted at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value
reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate is found to be no greater than 0.00057 m3/min
(0.02 cfm) or 4 percent of the average sampling rate (whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no
correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is
obtained, either record the leakage rate and correct the sample volume, as shown in section 12.4 of this
method, or void the sampling run.
8.5 Sampling train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic sampling rate
(within 10 percent of true isokinetic unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a temperature
around the filter of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F), or such other temperature as specified by an applicable
subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator.
8.5.1 For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown in Figure 5-2
of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Be sure to record the initial reading. Record the DGM
readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time increment, when changes in flow rates are made,
before and after each leak-check, and when sampling is halted. Take other readings indicated by
Figure 5-2 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A at least once at each sample point during each time
increment and additional readings when significant changes (20 percent variation in velocity head
readings) necessitate additional adjustments in flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the
manometer level and zero may drift due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks
during the traverse.
8.5.2 Clean the portholes prior to the test run to minimize the chance of sampling deposited
material. To begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that the filter and probe heating systems
are up to temperature and that the pitot tube and probe are properly positioned. Position the nozzle at the
first traverse point with the tip pointing directly into the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and
adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs are available, which aid in the rapid adjustment of
the isokinetic sampling rate without excessive computations. These nomographs are designed for use
when the Type S pitot tube coefficient (Cp) is 0.85 ± 0.02 and the stack gas equivalent density (dry
molecular weight) is 29 ± 4. APTD-0576 details the procedure for using the nomographs. If Cp and Md
are outside the above-stated ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps (see Reference 7
in section 17.0 of this method) are taken to compensate for the deviations.
-------
8.5.3 When the stack is under significant negative pressure (height of impinger stem), close the
coarse adjust valve before inserting the probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into the filter
holder. If necessary, the pump may be turned on with the coarse adjust valve closed.
8.5.4 When the probe is in position, block off the openings around the probe and porthole to
prevent unrepresentative dilution of the gas stream.
8.5.5 Traverse the stack cross-section, as required by Method 1, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A or
as specified by the Administrator, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when
sampling near the walls or when removing or inserting the probe through the portholes; this minimizes
the chance of extracting deposited material.
8.5.6 During the test run, make periodic adjustments to keep the temperature around the filter
holder at the proper level; add more ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than 20°C
(68°F) at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and zero of the manometer.
8.5.7 If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high, making isokinetic sampling difficult
to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of the sample run. It is recommended that another
complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting to change the filter itself. Before a new filter
assembly is installed, conduct a leak check (see section 8.4.3 of this method). The total PM weight shall
include the summation of the filter assembly catches.
8.5.8 A single train shall be used for the entire sample run, except in cases where simultaneous
sampling is required in two or more separate ducts or at two or more different locations within the same
duct, or in cases where equipment failure necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use
of two or more trains will be subject to the approval of the Administrator.
NOTE: When two or more trains arc used, separate analyses of the front-half and (if applicable)
impinger catches from each train shall be performed, unless identical nozzle sizes were used in all trains,
in which case the front-half catches from the individual trains may be combined (as may the impinger
catches) and one analysis of the front-half catch and one analysis of the impinger catch may be
performed.
8.5.9 At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle
from the stack, turn off the pump, record the final DGM reading, and then conduct a post-test leak check,
as outlined in section 8.4.4 of this method. Also leak-check the pitot lines as described in section 8.1 of
Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. The lines must pass this leak check in order to validate the
velocity head data.
8.6 Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic (see Calculations, section
12.12 of this method) to determine whether a run was valid or another test run should be made. If there
was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates because of source conditions, consult the Administrator for
possible variance on the isokinetic rates.
8.7 Sample recovery.
8.7.1 Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is removed from the stack at the end
of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool.
8.7.2 When the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all external PM near the tip of the probe
nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining PM. Do not cap off the probe tip tightly while
the sampling train is cooling down. This would create a vacuum in the filter holder, thus drawing water
from the impingers into the filter holder.
8.7.3 Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the sample
train, wipe off the silicone grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any
condensate that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter inlet where the probe was
fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord from the last impinger and cap the impinger. If a flexible
line is used between the first impinger or condenser and the filter holder, disconnect the line at the filter
holder and let any condensed water or liquid drain into the impingers or condenser. After wiping off the
silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet. Ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or
serum caps may be used to close these openings.
8.7.4 Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area. This area should be
3K"
-------
clean and protected from the wind so that the chances of contaminating or losing the sample will be
minimized.
8.7.5 Save a portion of the acetone and methylene chloride used for cleanup as blanks. Take 200
ml of each solvent directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in glass sample containers
labeled "acetone blank" and "methylene chloride blank," respectively.
8.7.6 Inspect the train prior to and during disassembly and note any abnormal conditions. Treat
the samples as follows:
8.7.6.1 Container No. 1. Carefully remove the filter from the filter holder, and place it in its
identified petri dish container. Use a pair of tweezers and/or clean disposable surgical gloves to handle
the filter. If it is necessary to fold the filter, do so such that the PM cake is inside the fold. Using a dry
nylon bristle brush and/or a sharp-edged blade, carefully transfer to the petri dish any PM and/or filter
fibers that adhere to the filter holder gasket. Seal the container.
8.7.6.2 Container No. 2. Taking care to see that dust on the outside of the probe or other
exterior surfaces does not get into the sample, quantitatively recover PM or any condensate from the
probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder by washing these components
with acetone and placing the wash in a glass container. Perform the acetone rinse as follows:
8.7.6.2.1 Carefully remove the probe nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with acetone
from a wash bottle and brushing with a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the acetone rinse shows no
visible particles, after which make a final rinse of the inside surface with acetone.
8.7.6.2.2 Brush and rinse the inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with acetone in a similar way
until no visible particles remain.
8.7.6.2.3 Rinse the probe liner with acetone by tilting and rotating the probe while squirting
acetone into its upper end so that all inside surfaces are wetted with acetone. Let the acetone drain from
the lower end into the sample container. A funnel (glass or polyethylene) may be used to aid in
transferring liquid washes to the container. Follow the acetone rinse with a probe brush. Hold the probe
in an inclined position, squirt acetone into the upper end as the probe brush is being pushed with a
twisting action through the probe, hold a sample container under the lower end of the probe, and catch
any acetone and PM that is brushed from the probe. Run the brush through the probe three times or more
until no visible PM is carried out with the acetone or until none remains in the probe liner on visual
inspection. With stainless steel or other metal probes, run the brush through in the above-described
manner at least six times, since metal probes have small crevices in which PM can be entrapped. Rinse
the brush with acetone and quantitatively collect these washings in the sample container. After the
brushing, make a final acetone rinse of the probe as described above.
8.7.6.2.4 It is recommended that two people clean the probe to minimize sample losses.
Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean and protected from contamination.
8.7.6.2.5 After ensuring that all joints have been wiped clean of silicone grease, clean the inside
of the front half of the filter holder by rubbing the surfaces with a nylon bristle brush and rinsing with
acetone. Rinse each surface three times or more if needed to remove visible particulate. Make a final
rinse of the brush and filter holder. Carefully rinse out the glass cyclone also (if applicable).
8.7.6.2.6 After rinsing the nozzle, probe, and front half of the filter holder with acetone, repeat
the entire procedure with methylene chloride and save in a separate No. 2M container.
8.7.6.2.7 After acetone and methylene chloride washings and PM have been collected in the
proper sample containers, tighten the lid on the sample containers so that acetone and methylene chloride
will not leak out when it is shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine
whether leakage occurs during transport. Label each container to identify clearly its contents.
8.7.6.3 Container No. 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to determine whether it has
been completely spent, and make a notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the fourth
impinger to its original container and seal the container. A funnel may make it easier to pour the silica
gel without spilling. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid in removing the silica gel from the
impinger. It is not necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that may adhere to the
impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in weight is to be used for moisture
3^
-------
calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is available in the
field, follow the procedure for Container No. 3 in section 11.2.3 of this method.
8.7.6.4 Impinger water. Treat the impingers as follows:
8.7.6.4.1 Make a notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid that is in
the first three impingers to within 1 ml by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to within 0.5 g by
using a balance (if one is available). Record the volume or weight of liquid present. This information is
required to calculate the moisture content of the effluent gas.
8.7.6.4.2 Following the determination of the volume of liquid present, rinse the back half of the
train with water, add it to the impinger catch, and store it in a container labeled 3W (water).
8.7.6.4.3 Following the water rinse, rinse the back half of the train with acetone to remove the
excess water to enhance subsequent organic recovery with methylene chloride and quantitatively recover
to a container labeled 3S (solvent) followed by at least three sequential rinsings with aliquots of
methylene chloride. Quantitatively recover to the same container labeled 3S. Record separately the
amount of both acetone and methylene chloride used to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5g.
NOTE: Because the subsequent analytical finish is gravimetric, it is okay to recover both
solvents to the same container. This would not be recommended if other analytical finishes were
required.
8.8 Sample transport. Whenever possible, containers should be shipped in such a way that they
remain upright at all times.
9.0 Quality Control.
9.1 Miscellaneous quality control measures.
Section Quality Control Measure Effect
8.4, Sampling and equipment Ensure accurate
10.1 -10.6 leak check and calibration measurement of
stack gas flow rate,
sample volume
9.2 Volume metering system checks. The following quality control procedures are suggested to
check the volume metering system calibration values at the field test site prior to sample collection.
These procedures are optional.
9.2.1 Meter orifice check. Using the calibration data obtained during the calibration procedure
described in section 10.3 of this method, determine the AH@ for the metering system orifice. The AH@ is
the orifice pressure differential in units of in. H20 that correlates to 0.75 cfm of air at 528°R and 29.92 in.
Hg. The AH@ is calculated as follows:
T 02
AH. = 0.0319 AH m
Y2 V2
'bar ' m
where
0.0319 = (0.0567 in. Hg/°R)(0.75 cfm)2;
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter, in. H20;
Tm = Absolute average DGM temperature, °R;
9 = Total sampling time, min;
^bar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg;
Y = DGM calibration factor, dimensionless;
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by DGM, dcf.
9.2.1.1 Before beginning the field test (a set of three runs usually constitutes a field test), operate
ill-
-------
the metering system (i.e., pump, volume meter, and orifice) at the AH@ pressure differential for 10
minutes. Record the volume collected, the DGM temperature, and the barometric pressure. Calculate a
DGM calibration check value, Yc, as follows:
10
0.0319 Tm
1
2
Vm
m
p
bar
where
Yc = DGM calibration check value, dimensionless;
10 = Run time, min.
9.2.1.2 Compare the Yc value with the dry gas meter calibration factor Y to determine that: 0.97
Y < Yc < 1.03Y. If the Yc value is not within this range, the volume metering system should be
investigated before beginning the test.
9.2.2 Calibrated critical orifice. A calibrated critical orifice, calibrated against a wet test meter
or spirometer and designed to be inserted at the inlet of the sampling meter box, may be used as a quality
control check by following the procedure of section 16.2 of this method.
10.0 Calibration and Standardization.
NOTE: Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations.
10.1 Probe nozzle. Probe nozzles shall be calibrated before their initial use in the field. Using a
micrometer, measure the ID of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025 mm (0.001 in.). Make three separate
measurements using different diameters each time, and obtain the average of the measurements. The
difference between the high and low numbers shall not exceed 0.1 mm (0.004 in.). When nozzles
become nicked, dented, or corroded, they shall be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each
nozzle shall be permanently and uniquely identified.
10.2 Pitot tube assembly. The Type S pitot tube assembly shall be calibrated according to the
procedure outlined in section 10.1 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
10.3 Metering system.
10.3.1 Calibration prior to use. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system shall be
calibrated as follows: Connect the metering system inlet to the outlet of a wet test meter that is accurate
to within 1 percent. Refer to Figure 5-5 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. The wet test meter
should have a capacity of 30 liters/revolution (1 ft3/rev). A spirometer of 400 liters (14 ft3) or more
capacity, or equivalent, may be used for this calibration, although a wet test meter is usually more
practical. The wet test meter should be periodically calibrated with a spirometer or a liquid displacement
meter to ensure the accuracy of the wet test meter. Spirometers or wet test meters of other sizes may be
used, provided that the specified accuracies of the procedure are maintained. Run the metering system
pump for about 15 minutes with the orifice manometer indicating a median reading, as expected in field
use, to allow the pump to warm up and to permit the interior surface of the wet test meter to be
thoroughly wetted. Then, at each of a minimum of three orifice manometer settings, pass an exact
quantity of gas through the wet test meter and note the gas volume indicated by the DGM. Also note the
barometric pressure and the temperatures of the wet test meter, the inlet of the DGM, and the outlet of
the DGM. Select the highest and lowest orifice settings to bracket the expected field operating range of
the orifice. Use a minimum volume of 0.15 m3 (5 cf) at all orifice settings. Record all the data on a form
similar to Figure 5-6 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A, and calculate Y (the DGM calibration
factor) and AH@ (the orifice calibration factor) at each orifice setting, as shown on Figure 5-6 of Method
5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Allowable tolerances for individual Y and AH@ values are given in
Figure 5-6 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Use the average of the Y values in the calculations
in section 12 of this method.
10.3.1.1. Before calibrating the metering system, it is suggested that a leak check be conducted.
W8
-------
For metering systems having diaphragm pumps, the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages
within the pump. For these cases the following leak check procedure is suggested: make a 10-minute
calibration run at 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm); at the end of the run, take the difference of the measured
wet test meter and DGM volumes; divide the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate should
not exceed 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm).
10.3.2 Calibration after use. After each field use, the calibration of the metering system shall be
checked by performing three calibration runs at a single, intermediate orifice setting (based on the
previous field test) with the vacuum set at the maximum value reached during the test series. To adjust
the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet test meter and the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the
average value of the DGM calibration factor. If the value has changed by more than 5 percent,
recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as previously detailed.
NOTE: Alternative procedures, e.g., rechecking the orifice meter coefficient, may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
10.3.3 Acceptable variation in calibration. If the DGM coefficient values obtained before and
after a test series differ by more than 5 percent, either the test series shall be voided or calculations for
the test series shall be performed using whichever meter coefficient value (i.e., before or after) gives the
lower value of total sample volume.
10.4 Probe heater calibration. Use a heat source to generate air heated to selected temperatures
that approximate those expected to occur in the sources to be sampled. Pass this air through the probe at
a typical sample flow rate while measuring the probe inlet and outlet temperatures at various probe heater
settings. For each air temperature generated, construct a graph of probe heating system setting versus
probe outlet temperature. The procedure outlined in APTD-0576 can also be used. Probes constructed
according to APTD-0581 need not be calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 arc used. Also,
probes with outlet temperature monitoring capabilities do not require calibration.
NOTE: The probe heating system shall be calibrated before its initial use in the field.
10.5 Temperature sensors. Use the procedure in section 10.3 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60,
appendix A to calibrate in-stack temperature sensors. Dial thermometers, such as are used for the DGM
and condenser outlet, shall be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers.
10.6 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.
11.0 Analytical Procedure.
11.1 Record the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in Figure 315-1 of this method.
11.2 Handle each sample container as follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1.
11.2.1.1 PM analysis. Leave the contents in the shipping container or transfer the filter and any
loose PM from the sample container to a tared glass weighing dish. Desiccate for 24 hours in a
desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh to a constant weight and report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg. For purposes of this section, the term "constant weight" means a difference of no more
than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between weighings (overnight desiccation is a
common practice). If a third weighing is required and it agrees within ±0.5 mg, then the results of the
second weighing should be used. For quality assurance purposes, record and report each individual
weighing; if more than three weighings are required, note this in the results for the subsequent MCEM
results.
11.2.1.2 MCEM analysis. Transfer the filter and contents quantitatively into a beaker. Add 100
ml of methylene chloride and cover with aluminum foil. Sonicate for 3 minutes then allow to stand for
20 minutes. Set up the filtration apparatus. Decant the solution into a clean Buchner fritted funnel.
Immediately pressure filter the solution through the tube into another clean, dry beaker. Continue
decanting and pressure filtration until all the solvent is transferred. Rinse the beaker and filter with 10 to
20 ml methylene chloride, decant into the Buchner fritted funnel and pressure filter. Place the beaker on
a low-temperature hot plate (maximum 40°C) and slowly evaporate almost to dryness. Transfer the
remaining last few milliliters of solution quantitatively from the beaker (using at least three aliquots of
-------
methylene chloride rinse) to a tared clean dry aluminum dish and evaporate to complete dryness.
Remove from heat once solvent is evaporated. Reweigh the dish after a 30-minute equilibrium in the
balance room and determine the weight to the nearest 0.1 mg. Conduct a methylene chloride blank run in
an identical fashion.
11.2.2 Container No. 2.
11.2.2.1 PM analysis. Note the level of liquid in the container, and confirm on the analysis sheet
whether leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void
the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to correct the final results.
Measure the liquid in this container either volumctrically to ±1 ml or gravimetrically to ±0.5 g. Transfer
the contents to a tared 250 ml beaker and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure.
Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.2.2 MCEM analysis. Add 25 ml methylene chloride to the beaker and cover with
aluminum foil. Sonicate for 3 minutes then allow to stand for 20 minutes; combine with contents of
Container No. 2M and pressure filter and evaporate as described for Container 1 in section 11.2.1.2 of
this method.
NOTES FOR MCEM ANALYSIS:
1. Light finger pressure only is necessary on 24/40 adaptor. A Chemplast adapter #15055-240
has been found satisfactory.
2. Avoid aluminum dishes made with fluted sides, as these may promote solvent "creep,"
resulting in possible sample loss.
3. If multiple samples are being run, rinse the Buchner fritted funnel twice between samples with
5 ml solvent using pressure filtration. After the second rinse, continue the flow of air until the glass frit
is completely dry. Clean the Buchner fritted funnels thoroughly after filtering five or six samples.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5
g using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Container 3W (impinger water).
11.2.4.1 MCEM analysis. Transfer the solution into a 1,000 ml separatory funnel quantitatively
with methylene chloride washes. Add enough solvent to total approximately 50 ml, if necessary. Shake
the funnel for 1 minute, allow the phases to separate, and drain the solvent layer into a 250 ml beaker.
Repeat the extraction twice. Evaporate with low heat (less than 40°C) until near dryness. Transfer the
remaining few milliliters of solvent quantitatively with small solvent washes into a clean, dry, tared
aluminum dish and evaporate to dryness. Remove from heat once solvent is evaporated. Reweigh the
dish after a 30-minute equilibration in the balance room and determine the weight to the nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.5 Container 3S (solvent).
11.2.5.1 MCEM analysis. Transfer the mixed solvent to 250 ml beaker(s). Evaporate and weigh
following the procedures detailed for container 3W in section 11.2.4 of this method.
11.2.6 Blank containers. Measure the distilled water, acetone, or methylene chloride in each
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the "solvent" to a tared 250 ml beaker, and
evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. (Conduct a solvent blank on the distilled
deionized water blank in an identical fashion to that described in section 11.2.4.1 of this method.)
Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
NOTE: The contents of Containers No. 2, 3W, and 3M as well as the blank containers may be
evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the
temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to prevent "bumping," the evaporation
process must be closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to
maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone and methylene chloride are highly
flammable and have a low flash point.
12.0 Data Analysis and Calculations.
12.1 Carry out calculations, retaining at least one extra decimal figure beyond that of the
acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation. Other forms of the equations may be used as
long as they give equivalent results.
3?>°
-------
12.2 Nomenclature.
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, m3 (ft3).
Bws = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume.
Ca = Acetone blank residue concentration, mg/g.
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, dry basis, corrected to standard
conditions, g/dscm (g/dscf).
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
La = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or for a leak check
following a component change; equal to 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm) or 4 percent of the
average sampling rate, whichever is less.
L; = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted prior to the "i"1"
component change (I = 1, 2, 3...n), m3/min (cfm).
Lp = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak check, m3/min (cfm).
ma = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg.
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, mg.
Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 g/g-mole (18.0 lb/lb-mole).
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the sampling site, mm Hg (in Hg).
Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
P^d = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg).
R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 [(mm Hg)(m3)]/[(°K)
(g-mole)| {21.85 [(in. Hg)(ft3)]/[(°R)(lb-mole)]}.
Tm = Absolute average dry gas meter (DGM) temperature (see Figure 5-2 of Method 5,40
CFR part 60, appendix A), °K (°R).
Ts = Absolute average stack gas temperature (see Figure 5-2 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60,
appendix A), °K(°R).
Tad = Standard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R).
Va = Volume of acetone blank, ml.
Vaw = Volume of acetone used in wash, ml.
V, = Volume of methylene chloride blank, ml.
Vw = Volume of methylene chloride used in wash, ml.
Vlc = Total volume liquid collected in impingers and silica gel (see Figure 5-3 of Method 5,
40 CFR part 60, appendix A), ml.
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter, dcm (dcf).
Vm(std) = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions,
dscm (dscf).
VW(5td) = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scm (scf).
V5 = Stack gas velocity, calculated by Equation 2-9 in Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix
A, using data obtained from Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A, m/sec (ft/sec).
Wa = Weight of residue in acetone wash, mg.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter (see Figure 5-2 of Method 5, 40
CFR part 60, appendix A), mm H20 (in H20).
pa = Density of acetone, 785.1 mg/ml (or see label on bottle).
pw = Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml (0.002201 lb/ml).
pt = Density of methylene chloride, 1316.8 mg/ml (or see label on bottle).
9 = Total sampling time, min.
0, = Sampling time interval, from the beginning of a run until the first component change,
min.
0, = Sampling time interval, between two successive component changes, beginning with the
interval between the first and second changes, min.
0 = Sampling time interval, from the final (n"1) component change until the end of the
-------
sampling run, min.
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
60 = Sec/min.
100 = Conversion to percent.
12.3 Average dry gas meter temperature and average orifice pressure drop. See data sheet
(Figure 5-2 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A).
12.4 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample volume measured by the dry gas meter to standard
conditions (20°C, 760 mm Hg or 68°F, 29.92 in Hg) by using Equation 315-1.
std
V = V Y-
* * m
Pbar+
AH
13.6
Ea 315-1
T P
m std
Pbar+
= V=K,VmY-
A H
13.6,
m
where
K, = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units,
= 17.64 °R/in Hg for English units.
NOTE: Equation 315-1 can be used as written unless the leakage rate observed during any of the
mandatory leak checks (i.e., the post-test leak check or leak checks conducted prior to component
changes) exceeds La. If Lp or L; exceeds La, Equation 315-1 must be modified as follows:
(a) Case I. No component changes made during sampling run. In this case, replace Vni in Equation
315-1 with the expression:
[Vm - (Lp - LJ 0]
(b) Case II. One or more component changes made during the sampling run. In this case, replace
Vm in Equation
315-1 by the expression:
["m - a, - La) 0, - t V-, - La) e, - (Lp - La) 0J
i-2
and substitute only for those leakage rates (Li or Lp) which exceed La.
12.5 Volume of water vapor condensed.
^ = VlcP;.RIS'd - K2 Vt Eg. 315-2
Mw std
where
K2 = 0.001333 m3/ml for metric units;
-------
= 0.04706 ft3/ml for English units.
12.6 Moisture content.
B
V,
wjstd)
ivs
V.
m(stcf)
Vi
w{std)
Ea. 315-3
NOTE: In saturated or water droplet-laden gas streams, two calculations of the moisture content
of the stack gas shall be made, one from the impinger analysis (Equation 315-3), and a second from the
assumption of saturated conditions. The lower of the two values of B^. shall be considered correct. The
procedure for determining the moisture content based upon assumption of saturated conditions is given in
section 4.0 of Method 4, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. For the purposes of this method, the average stack
gas temperature from Figure 5-2 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A may be used to make this
determination, provided that the accuracy of the in-stack temperature sensor is ±1°C (2°F).
12.7 Acetone blank concentration.
Ma
ca = -r. Eg 315-4
a Pa
12.8 Acetone wash blank.
Wa = CaVawPa Eg. 315-5
12.9 Total particulate weight. Determine the total PM catch from the sum of the weights
obtained from Containers 1 and 2 less the acetone blank associated with these two containers (see Figure
315-1).
NOTE: Refer to section 8.5.8 of this method to assist in calculation of results involving two or
more filter assemblies or two or more sampling trains.
12.10 Particulate concentration.
c5 = K3 m/Vm(5td) Eq. 315-6
where
K
= 0.001 g/mg for metric units;
= 0.0154 gr/mg for English units.
12.11 Conversion factors.
From
To
Multiply bv
ft3
m3
0.02832
gr
mg
64.80004
cro
u)
mg/m3
2288.4
mg
g
0.001
gr
lb
1.429 x 10^
12.12 Isokinetic variation.
12.12.1 Calculation from raw data.
I =
V Y
m
\P AHl
100 Ts
*4 K -
< i
[ bar 13.6J
60 0 Ps An
Ea. 315-7
where
K4 = 0.003454 [(mm Hg)(m3)]/[(ml)(°K)] for metric units;
38T>
-------
= 0.002669 [(in Hg)(ft3)]/[(ml)(°R)] for English units.
12.12.2 Calculation from intermediate values.
I = Ts Vm(std) ^std 100
T* v, 0 A„ Ps 60 (1 -BJ
Ea. 315-8
*5
Ts ^m(std)
P v A 0 (1 -B )
s s n v ws>
where
K5 = 4.320 for metric units;
= 0.09450 for English units.
12.12.3 Acceptable results. If 90 percent < I < 110 percent, the results are acceptable. If the PM
or MCEM results arc low in comparison to the standard, and "I" is over 110 percent or less than 90
percent, the Administrator may opt to accept the results. Reference 4 in the Bibliography may be used to
make acceptability judgments. If "I" is judged to be unacceptable, reject the results, and repeat the test.
12.13 Stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. Calculate the average stack gas velocity and
volumetric flow rate, if needed, using data obtained in this method and the equations in sections 5.2 and
5.3 of Method 2,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
12.14 MCEM results. Determine the MCEM concentration from the results from Containers 1,
2, 2M, 3W, and 3S less the acetone, methylene chloride, and filter blanks value as determined in the
following equation:
mmcem = lmtotal ~ Wa ~ Wt ~ fb
13.0 Method Performance. [Reserved]
14.0 Pollution Prevention. [Reserved]
15.0 Waste Management. [Reserved]
16.0 Alternative Procedures.
16.1 Dry gas meter as a calibration standard. A DGM may be used as a calibration standard for
volume measurements in place of the wet test meter specified in section 16.1 of this method, provided
that it is calibrated initially and recalibrated periodically as follows:
16.1.1 Standard dry gas meter calibration.
16.1.1.1. The DGM to be calibrated and used as a secondary reference meter should be of high
quality and have an appropriately sized capacity, e.g., 3 liters/rev (0.1 ft3/rev). A spirometer (400 liters
or more capacity), or equivalent, may be used for this calibration, although a wet test meter is usually
more practical. The wet test meter should have a capacity of 30 liters/rev (1 ftVrev) and be capable of
-------
measuring volume to within 1.0 percent; wet test meters should be checked against a spirometer or a
liquid displacement meter to ensure the accuracy of the wet test meter. Spirometers or wet test meters of
other sizes may be used, provided that the specified accuracies of the procedure are maintained.
16.1.1.2 Set up the components as shown in Figure 5-7 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A. A spirometer, or equivalent, may be used in place of the wet test meter in the system. Run the pump
for at least 5 minutes at a flow rate of about 10 liters/min (0.35 cfm) to condition the interior surface of
the wet test meter. The pressure drop indicated by the manometer at the inlet side of the DGM should be
minimized (no greater than 100 mm H20 [4 in. H20] at a flow rate of 30 liters/min [1 cfm]). This can be
accomplished by using large- diameter tubing connections and straight pipe fittings.
16.1.1.3 Collect the data as shown in the example data sheet (see Figure 5-8 of Method 5, 40
CFR part 60, appendix A). Make triplicate runs at each of the flow rates and at no less than five different
flow rates. The range of flow rates should be between 10 and 34 liters/min (0.35 and 1.2 cfm) or over the
expected operating range.
16.1.1.4 Calculate flow rate, Q, for each run using the wet test meter volume, Vw, and the run
time, q. Calculate the DGM coefficient, Y^, for each run. These calculations are as follows:
Phar V
Qis bar w
= Ea. 315-9
+ U ©
Vw (T"ds + T"std) Pbar
Vda ar
= Barometric pressure, mm Hg (in Hg);
Vw :
= Wet test meter volume, liter (ft3);
tw
= Average wet test meter temperature, °C (°F);
^std
= 273°C for SI units; 460°F for English units;
0
= Run time, min;
t(ls
= Average dry gas meter temperature, °C (°F);
Vfc :
Dry gas meter volume, liter (ft3);
Ap
= Dry gas meter inlet differential pressure, mm H20 (in H20).
16.1.1.5 Compare the three Y^ values at each of the flow rates and determine the maximum and
minimum values. The difference between the maximum and minimum values at each flow rate should be
no greater than 0.030. Extra sets of triplicate runs may be made in order to complete this requirement. In
addition, the meter coefficients should be between 0.95 and 1.05. If these specifications cannot be met in
three sets of successive triplicate runs, the meter is not suitable as a calibration standard and should not
be used as such. If these specifications are met, average the three values at each flow rate resulting in
five average meter coefficients, Y(b.
16.1.1.6 Prepare a curve of meter coefficient, Y^, versus flow rate, Q, for the DGM. This curve
shall be used as a reference when the meter is used to calibrate other DGMs and to determine whether
recalibration is required.
16.1.2 Standard dry gas meter recalibration.
16.1.2.1 Recalibrate the standard DGM against a wet test meter or spirometer annually or after
every 200 hours of operation, whichever comes first. This requirement is valid provided the standard
DGM is kept in a laboratory and, if transported, cared for as any other laboratory instrument. Abuse to
ZZ<~
-------
the standard meter may cause a change in the calibration and will require more frequent recalibrations.
16.1.2.2 As an alternative to full recalibration, a two-point calibration check may be made.
Follow the same procedure and equipment arrangement as for a full recalibration, but run the meter at
only two flow rates (suggested rates arc 14 and 28 liters/min [0.5 and 1.0 cfm]). Calculate the meter
coefficients for these two points, and compare the values with the meter calibration curve. If the two
coefficients are within 1.5 percent of the calibration curve values at the same flow rates, the meter need
not be recalibrated until the next date for a recalibration check.
16.2 Critical orifices as calibration standards. Critical orifices may be used as calibration
standards in place of the wet test meter specified in section 10.3 of this method, provided that they are
selected, calibrated, and used as follows:
16.2.1 Selection of critical orifices.
16.2.1.1 The procedure that follows describes the use of hypodermic needles or stainless steel
needle tubing that has been found suitable for use as critical orifices. Other materials and critical orifice
designs may be used provided the orifices act as true critical orifices; i.e., a critical vacuum can be
obtained, as described in section 7.2.2.2.3 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Select five critical
orifices that are appropriately sized to cover the range of flow rates between 10 and 34 liters/min or the
expected operating range. Two of the critical orifices should bracket the expected operating range. A
minimum of three critical orifices will be needed to calibrate a Method 5 DGM; the other two critical
orifices can serve as spares and provide better selection for bracketing the range of operating flow rates.
The needle sizes and tubing lengths shown in Table 315-1 give the approximate flow rates indicated in
the table.
16.2.1.2 These needles can be adapted to a Method 5 type sampling train as follows: Insert a
serum bottle stopper, 13 x 20 mm sleeve type, into a 0.5 in Swagelok quick connect. Insert the needle
into the stopper as shown in Figure 5-9 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
16.2.2 Critical orifice calibration. The procedure described in this section uses the Method 5
meter box configuration with a DGM as described in section 6.1.1.9 of this method to calibrate the
critical orifices. Other schemes may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
16.2.2.1 Calibration of meter box. The critical orifices must be calibrated in the same
configuration as they will be used; i.e., there should be no connections to the inlet of the orifice.
16.2.2.1.1 Before calibrating the meter box, leak-check the system as follows: Fully open the
coarse adjust valve and completely close the bypass valve. Plug the inlet. Then turn on the pump and
determine whether there is any leakage. The leakage rate shall be zero; i.e., no detectable movement of
the DGM dial shall be seen for 1 minute.
16.2.2.1.2 Check also for leakages in that portion of the sampling train between the pump and
the orifice meter. See section 5.6 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A for the procedure; make any
corrections, if necessary. If leakage is detected, check for cracked gaskets, loose fittings, worn 0-rings,
etc. and make the necessary repairs.
16.2.2.1.3 After determining that the meter box is leakless, calibrate the meter box according to
the procedure given in section 5.3 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Make sure that the wet test
meter meets the requirements stated in section 7.1.1.1 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Check
the water level in the wet test meter. Record the DGM calibration factor, Y.
16.2.2.2 Calibration of critical orifices. Set up the apparatus as shown in Figure 5-10 of Method
5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
16.2.2.2.1 Allow a warm-up time of 15 minutes. This step is important to equilibrate the
temperature conditions through the DGM.
16.2.2.2.2 Leak-check the system as in section 7.2.2.1.1 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix
A. The leakage rate shall be zero.
16.2.2.2.3 Before calibrating the critical orifice, determine its suitability and the appropriate
operating vacuum as follows: turn on the pump, fully open the coarse adjust valve, and adjust the bypass
valve to give a vacuum reading corresponding to about half of atmospheric pressure. Observe the meter
box orifice manometer reading, DH. Slowly increase the vacuum reading until a stable reading is
-------
obtained on the meter box orifice manometer. Record the critical vacuum for each orifice. Orifices that
do not reach a critical value shall not be used.
16.2.2.2.4 Obtain the barometric pressure using a barometer as described in section 6.1.2 of this
method. Record the barometric pressure, Pbar, in mm Hg (in. Hg).
16.2.2.2.5 Conduct duplicate runs at a vacuum of 25 to 50 mm Hg (1 to 2 in. Hg) above the
critical vacuum. The runs shall be at least 5 minutes each. The DGM volume readings shall be in
increments of complete revolutions of the DGM. As a guideline, the times should not differ by more
than 3.0 seconds (this includes allowance for changes in the DGM temperatures) to achieve ±0.5 percent
in K'. Record the information listed in Figure 5-11 of Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
16.2.2.2.6 Calculate K' using Equation 315-11.
2
K/ K\V™Y (Pfar + Ed. 315-11
= Pbar Tm ©
where
K' = Critical orifice coefficient, [m3)(°K)*]/
[(mm Hg)(min)] {[(ft3)(°R)yi)]/[(in. Hg)(min)]};
Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature, °K (°R).
16.2.2.2.7 Average the K' values. The individual K' values should not differ by more than ±0.5
percent from the average.
16.2.3 Using the critical orifices as calibration standards.
16.2.3.1 Record the barometric pressure.
16.2.3.2 Calibrate the metering system according to the procedure outlined in sections 7.2.2.2.1
to 7.2.2.2.5 of Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Record the information listed in Figure 5-12 of
Method 5,40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
16.2.3.3 Calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM and the critical orifices,
and calculate the DGM calibration factor, Y, using the equations below:
[Pte + (AH/13.6)]/Tm Eq. 313-12
V^, =K'(Pbar0)/Tarab"2 Eq. 315-13
Y = V^/V^ Eq. 315-14
where
V^ad) = Volume of gas sample passed through the
critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
K' = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units
= 17.64 °R/in Hg for English units.
16.2.3.4 Average the DGM calibration values for each of the flow rates. The calibration factor,
Y, at each of the flow rates should not differ by more than ±2 percent from the average.
16.2.3.5 To determine the need for recalibrating the critical orifices, compare the DGM Y
factors obtained from two adjacent orifices each time a DGM is calibrated; for example, when checking
orifice 13/2.5, use orifices 12/10.2 and 13/5.1. If any critical orifice yields a DGM Y factor differing by
more than 2 percent from the others, recalibrate the critical orifice according to section 7.2.2.2 of Method
5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
17.0 References.
1. Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC.
December 6,1967.
2. Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source-Sampling Equipment.
Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC. APTD-0581. April 1971.
3. Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source Sampling
3&V
-------
Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC. APTD-0576. March 1972.
4. Smith, W.S., R.T. Shigehara, and W.F. Todd. A Method of Interpreting Stack Sampling Data.
Paper Presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, St. Louis, MO.
June 14-19,1970.
5. Smith, W.S., et al. Stack Gas Sampling Improved and Simplified With New Equipment.
APCA Paper No. 67-119. 1967.
6. Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC. 1967.
7. Shigehara, R.T. Adjustment in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube Coefficients and
Dry Molecular Weights. Stack Sampling News 2:4-11. October 1974.
8. Vollaro, R.F. A Survey of Commercially Available Instrumentation for the Measurement of
Low-Range Gas Velocities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch.
Research Triangle Park, NC. November 1976 (unpublished paper).
9. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Part 26. Gaseous Fuels; Coal and Coke; Atmospheric
Analysis. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, PA. 1974. pp. 617-622.
10. Felix, L.G., G.I. Clinard, G.E. Lacy, and J.D. McCain. Inertial Cascade Impactor Substrate
Media for Flue Gas Sampling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC
27711. Publication No. EPA-600/7-77-060. June 1977. 83 p.
11. Westlin, P.R., and R.T. Shigehara. Procedure for Calibrating and Using Dry Gas Volume
Meters as Calibration Standards. Source Evaluation Society Newsletter. 3(l):17-30. February 1978.
12. Lodge, J.P., Jr., J.B. Pate, B.E. Ammons, and G.A. Swanson. The Use of Hypodermic
Needles as Critical Orifices in Air Sampling. J. Air Pollution Control Association. 16:197-200. 1966.
18.0 Tables. Diagrams. Flowcharts, and Validation Data
Gauge/length
(cm)
Flow rate
(liters/min)
Gauge/length
(cm)
Flow rate
(liters/min)
12/7.6
32.56
14/2.5
19.54
12/10.2
30.02
14/5.1
17.27
13/2.5
25.77
14/7.6
16.14
13/5.1
23.50
15/3.2
14.16
13/7.6
22.37
15/7.6
11.61
13/10.2
20.67
15/10.2
10.48
38$
-------
Particulate analysis
Plant
Date
Run No.
Filter No.
Amount liquid lost during
transport
Acetone blank volume (ml)
Acetone blank concentration (Eq.315-4) (mg/mg)
Acetone wash blank (Eq.315-5) (mg)
Final weight
(mg)
Tare weight (mg)
Weight gain (mg)
Container
No. 1
Container
No. 2
Total
Less Acetone blank
Weight of particulate matter
Moisture analysis
Final volume
(mg)
Initial volume (mg)
Liquid collected (mg)
Impingcrs
Note 1
Note 1
Silica gel
Total
FIGURE 315-1. Particulate and MCEM Analyses
Note 1: Convert volume of water to weight by multiplying by the density of water (1 g/ml).
-------
MCEM analysis
Container No.
Final
weight
(mg)
Tare of
aluminum
dish (mg)
Weight
gain
Acetone
wash volume
(ml)
Metita^taiiite
wash
volume
(ml)
1
2+2M
3W
3S
Total
E mtotal
E Kaw
E vtw
Less acetone wash blank (mg)
(not to exceed 1 mg/1 of
acetone used)
™a = Ca Pa E "a*
Less methylene chloride wash
blank (mg) (not to exceed
1.5 mg/1 of methylene
chloride used)
wt = CPt E vtw
Less filter blank (mg)
(not to exceed....
(mg/filter)
Fb
MCEM weight (mg)
mMCEOM = E m total ~ Wa ~ W< ~ fb
FIGURE 315-1 (Continued). Particulate And MCEM Analyses
£ jjc jjc jjc jjc
y\o
-------
APPENDIX H
PARTICIPANTS
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Affiliation
Name
Responsibility
USEPA
Michael L. Toney, EMC
Work Assignment Manager
Pacific Environmental
Services, Inc.
John Chehaske
Frank Phoenix
Program Manager
Project Manager
Dennis P. Holzschuh
QA Coordinator
Dennis D. Holzschuh
Site Leader/Console Operator
Derek Hawkes
Sampling Technician
Josh Berkowitz
Process Monitor
Atlantic Technical Services
(PES Subcontractor)
Alan Lowe
Emil Stewart
Site Leader/Console Operator
Sampling Technician/Data
Reduction
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
Please read instructions on the reverse before completing
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-454/R-00-028
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLF. AND SUBTITLE
Final Report
Hot Mix Asphalt Plants,
Truck Loading,
Manual Methods Testing,
Asphalt Plant D,
Barre, MA
5. REPORT DATE
May 2000
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
Volume I of 1
7. AUTHOR(S)
Frank J. Phoenix
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO
68-D-98004
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2771 1
13. TYPE OF REPOR T AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (F.PA) Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) is investigating hot mix
asphalt plants to identify and quantify particulate matter (PM) and methylene chloride extractablc matter (MCEM) emissions from load-out operations.
In support of this investigation, the OAQPS issued Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) a series of work assignments to conduct emissions
testing at an asphalt plant during load-out operations
The primary objective of the emissions testing was to characterize the uncontrolled emissions of PM and MCEM from a hatch production, hot mix
asphalt plant during poad-out operation Asphalt Plant D, abatch production facility in Barre, Massachusetts with the capacity to produce 1,600 tons per
day of hot mix asphalt, was selected by F.PA as the host facility. To capture load-out emissions, a temporary total enclosure (TTF.) and exhaust system wa;
built around the load-out bay at Plant D During load-out. emissions were drawn off the ITE through an exhaust duct with a 15,000 cubic feet per minute
(cfm) exhaust fan. Testing for load-out emissions was performed in the exhaust duct using EPA Test Methods 1,2,4, and 315. Three tests were performed
over three consecutive days beginning on October 5, 1998. Each test started early in the morning, ran most of the day, and included most of the plant's
production for the day. For each test, two simultaneous EPA Method 315 runs were performed, one to determine captured emissions and one to determine
fugitive emissions.
In addition to the emissions testing. PES monitored and recorded process operations, collected process samples, and measured the temperature of the
asphalt in the bed of selected transport trucks as the trucks left the load-out area Also, measurements were taken to estimate the deposition of MCEM on t
ceiling of the TI E and in the TI E exhaust duct.
Midwest Research Institute (MRI). another EPA contractor, was also on-site for the testing and measured total hydrocarbon emissions from the ITE
simultaneous with the PM and MCEM testing. The MRI data arc presented in a separate report.
The entire report consists of one volume totaling 440 pages
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTIONS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COASTI Field/Group
Methylene Chloride Extractablc
Matter
Particulate Matter
18. DISTRIBUTION S TA TEMEN T
19. SECURI TY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
440
Unlimited
20. SECURI TY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
I-PA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
F:\lJ\FMcadows\TRD.Frm\WP 6.1
------- |