United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA- 600 /Br 99-08 7
September 1999
*>EPA Research and llllllllllllllllllllllllll
PB99-175275
Development
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING
TEST REPORTS FOR EVALUATING
VOC CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
Prepared for
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Prepared by
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
REPRODUCED BY: ims
U.S. Department of Commerce— "—
National Technical Information Service
Springfield, Virginia 22161
-------
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
AJil'.KL—/ /o (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completii ||| |||| || |||||l| 1 111 1 III II
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-600/R-99-087
3. F III IIII II IRIlllllIII II llllll 111
PB99-175275 £75
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Assessment of Existing Test Reports for Evaluating
VOC Control Effectiveness
5. REPORT DATE
September 1999
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Brent W. Hall and Carl F. Singer
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
ARCAD1S Geraghty and Miller, Inc.
P.O. Box 13109
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D2-0063, Task 0/009
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Task Final; 2-9/93
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
15.supplementary notes ^PPCD project officer is Chester A. Vogel, Mail Drop 61, 919/
541-2827.
i6. abstract The report outlines the approach taken by EPA to review existing test re-
ports for evaluating volatile organic compound (VCC) control device effectiveness
and identifying missing control device effectiveness information. A format is pre-
sented to provide guidance and serve as the basis for all future databases involving
VOC control effectiveness. The format will serve as a summary page to be at-
tached to each test report for quick reference. Results indicate average control de-
vice efficiencies of 91 to 96% based on the method used and the device tested. Note
that the populations considered in this task were small and geographically biased.
(NOTE; Control effectiveness has recently become highly visible in the surface coat-
ing industry. Work has been directed toward a fundamental understanding of the pro-
blem, along with development of a database addressing the subject.)
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b.identifiers/open ended terms
c. COSATI Field/Group
Pollution
Coating Processes
Organic Compounds
Volatility
Tests
Data
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Volatile Organic Com-
pounds (VOCs)
Surface Coating
13 B
13 G
07C
20M
14B
14G
18. distribution statement
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21, NO. OF PAGES
100
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 <9-73)
-------
FOREWORD
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with pro-
tecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national
environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions lead-
ing to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural
systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA-'s research
program is providing data and technical support for solving environmental pro-
blems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our eco-
logical resources wisely* understand how pollutants affect our health, and pre-
vent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management.Research Laboratory is the Agency's center for
investigation of technological and management approaches for reducing risks
from threats to human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's
research program is on methods for the prevention and control of pollution to air,
land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public water
systems; remediation of contaminated sites and groundwater; and prevention and
control of indoor air pollution. The goal of this research effort is to catalyze
development and implementation of innovative, cost-effective environmental
technologies; develop scientific and engineering information needed by EPA to
support regulatory and policy decisions; and provide technical support and infor-
mation transfer to ensure effective implementation of environmental regulations
and strategies.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-
term research plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Re-
search and Development to assist the user community and to link researchers
with their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been peer and administratively reviewed by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or
commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
PROTECTED UNDER INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Reproduced from
bast available copy.
-------
EPA-600/ R-99-087
September 1999
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING TEST REPORTS FOR EVALUATING
VOC CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
Prepared by:
Brent W. Hall and Carl F, Singer
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
4915 Prospectus Drive
P.O. Box 13109
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0063
Work Assignment No. 0/009
EPA Project Officer: Chester A. Vogel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
ABSTRACT
Recent work for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to analysis of existing
test reports in the Office of Air Quality Planning Standards (OAQPS) for evaluation of volatile organic
compound (VOC) control device effectiveness. This report will present the approach taken during this
task to review existing test reports and identify missing data points, A format to provide guidance and
serve as the basis for all future databases involving VOC control effectiveness is also presented. This
format will serve as a summary page to be attached to each test report for quick reference. Results
indicate average control device efficiencies of 91 to 96 percent based on the methods used and the
particular device tested. It should be noted that the populations considered in this task were small and
based on data from only two states.
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
ABSTRACT ii
LIST OF FIGURES iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS 3
2.1 Input Materials 3
2.2 Explanation of Input Form 6
2.3 Explanation of Output Form 10
3.0 RESULTS 12
3.1 Sorting Results 12
3.2 Analysis of Data 13
3.3 Discussion of Remaining Data Gaps 18
4.0 CONCLUSIONS 20
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 22
6.0 REFERENCES 23
APPENDIX A—FORM DEFINITIONS A-1
APPENDIX B—SUMMARY PAGES B-l
APPENDIX C—REPORT REVIEWS C-l
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1, OAQPS Database Structure 4
2, Blank Plant Input Form 8
3, Blank Test Input Form 9
4, Example Summary Page 11
5, Summary of Plant Data Recovered 14
6, Summary of Test Data Recovered 15
iv
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 1988, research to investigate the status of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and to
determine if VOC control devices were operating as designed was performed for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). The primary goal of the study was to assess VOC control device
effectiveness and to determine if future efforts were needed in this area. Results indicated that there
were emerging and recurring problems with the control of VOCs that needed further investigation.
Subsequent studies were conducted to continue this work effort and to further define the problems
associated with VOC control. Testing was performed for EPA's National Risk Management Research
Laboratory, during full-scale commercial operation of VOC control devices, to begin developing a
database to document the performance of control devices currently in operation. However, the costs
associated with testing in-place control devices limited the study to a small number of tests.
Subsequent to the limited field tests, it was decided to search existing data on operational VOC
control devices. This search led to a database being developed by EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS) for emission factor development. This database of field sampling test reports
from state agencies and other various sources was obtained from OAQPS for use in the current work
effort.
Current work focuses on reviewing existing test reports and identifying missing control device
effectiveness information. Approximately 400 test records in dBASE III Plus format were obtained.
These records were sorted based on predetermined criteria related to the previous studies to identify
v
-------
controlled emissions from surface-coating plants. Four separate sorts yielded 63 test records that were
related to VOCs and eliminated plants known not to be surface-coating industries. A control device of
interest pertained to each of these 63 test records. These records were used throughout the remainder of
the current task.
Another goal was to develop a format for future databases. This would provide guidance and
serve as the basis for future databases involving VOC control effectiveness. The database would be used
to make a summary page to be attached to the front of each emission source test report. This would
facilitate finding information related to VOC control effectiveness for a particular plant or control
device. In addition, the summary page would serve as a quick reference for tracking control device
performance over a period of time.
After developing a database format, control effectiveness data identified in this task were filled
in for each test report. Several important items of information were consistently not found in reviewing
the test reports including control device residence time and installation date. Pertinent information from
the actual source test was also frequently missing or inadequate including solvent usage rate and gas flow
rates.
The average control device efficiency of catalytic incinerators was 92 percent based on EPA
Method 25 type measurements of total gaseous non-methane organics (TGNMO) and 95 percent based
on EPA Method 25A type measurements of total hydrocarbons (THC). The average control device
efficiency of thermal incinerators was 96 percent based on TGNMO and 91 percent based on THC.
Populations considered in this task were small and geographically biased.
vi
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The surface-coating industry is known to be a major contributor of anthropogenic volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions. These emissions originate from the coating of various substrates
such as film, metal coils, magnetic wire, and appliances. The pollutant is emitted when the VOC-laden
coating is applied to the substrate and subsequently dried in an oven. Ozone is formed when VOCs
photochemically react with nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere. Because of the regulations promulgated
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and various state and local agencies, VOC
emissions must be controlled by some proven control technology. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
(CAAAs) require EPA to develop and promulgate even more stringent regulations because of the large
number of ozone non-attainment areas in the country and the need to specifically demonstrate control of
an expanded list of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs),
Many technologies are available for the control of VOCs, but the population of control devices is
dominated by three separate types—carbon adsorbers, catalytic incinerators, and thermal incinerators.
The appropriate device is chosen based on process-specific conditions. Although many other types of
VOC control devices exist, these three were used for the purposes of this study.
Previous studies have indicated that VOC control devices may deteriorate during operation over
time and adversely affect unit performance. Control effectiveness is defined as this deterioration in
performance over time. Information exists that documents possible causes of degradation but not the
1
-------
extent or associated time frame. The goal of this study was to utilize existing source test data to evaluate
control effectiveness for VOC control devices currently in operation. The most informative method of
evaluating deterioration of control effectiveness would be comparing separate test reports for the same
source conducted at different times. Because reports meeting this criterion were not Found, current levels
of control effectiveness were compared with design efficiency to evaluate deterioration.
Another goal of this study is to compose the information extracted from the test reports into a
format to be used for future databases. This will produce a summary page(s) to be attached to the full
test report, which will facilitate quick and simple data analysis. In addition, this summary page will
serve as a guide for future work to be conducted in the area of VOC control effectiveness.
-------
SECTION 2
METHODS AND MATERIALS
2.1 INPUT MATERIALS
A dBASE III Plus database file, VOCJDATA.DBF, was received, containing 394 records
extracted from an Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Technical Support Division
(TSD)/Emission Inventory Branch (ElB)/Emission Factor and Methodologies Section (EFMS) database.1
The original OAQPS database was available but was not used in this task to avoid duplication of sorting
efforts. A separate database was also received regarding emissions in California, but no control device
or emission data were found in this file. VOC DATA.DBF was, therefore, exclusively used in this task
to identify VOC emission reports from surface-coating plants with an installed control device.
The OAQPS database records correspond to test reports provided by states and available through
OAQPS. This dBASE format is the OAQPS recommendation for a future database, and it also represents
an input format because the database was filled in directly from each report.2 No additional
documentation is available on the OAQPS database at this time. Review of control effectiveness
requires additional information to account for operating conditions, control device age, test methods,
maintenance schedules, etc. The OAQPS recommendations were retained, as much as was practical, in
the new database. The database received from OAQPS incorporated the fields shown in Figure 1.
3
-------
Structure for database; G:\DBASEW0CS\V0C_DATA.D3F
Number of data records: 395
Date of last update: 12/17/92
Field
Field Name
Type
Width
Dec
Index
1
FACILITY
Character
30
N
2
see
Character
8
N
3
AGENCY
Character
4
N
4
TES_DATS
Date
8
N
5
ADDRESS
Character
20
N
6
CITY
Character
15
N
7
STATE
Character
2
N
8
ZIP
Character
5
N
9
PROC_DESC
Character
25
N
10
TYPE_PROC
Character
55
N
11
POLLU_l
Character
11
N
12
C_DEVICE
Character
25
N
13
C_EFFICI
Numeric
5
2
N
14
PROC_RATE
Numeric
8
2
N
15
UNIT
Character
12
N
16
EM_RATE
Numeric
11
6
N
17
TJNITS_EM
Character
12
N
18
TST_METH
Character
6
N
19
TRAIN
Memo
10
N
20
NOTES
Memo
10
N
21
EM__FACTOR
Numeric
11
6
N
22
EF_UNITS
Character
12
N
23
RATTING
Character
1
N
** Total **
307
Figure 1. OAQPS database structure.
4
-------
A sorting procedure was performed on the dBASE III Plus file in order to focus on surface
coaters with operating VOC control devices of interest. Records meeting each subsequent test were
saved in a new dBASE IV file to facilitate analysis by various researchers. Discussion of the sorting
process is presented in Section 3.
Files received contained reports reviewed under a previous contract and spreadsheets printed in
Excel software format with analysis of these reports. These reports were all found in the OAQPS
database. The Excel printouts were used as a starting point for database development because many
factors affecting VOC control effectiveness were recorded. The Excel files did not, however, lend
themselves to a database format because each spreadsheet contained unique fields specific to individual
reports.
Copies of reports identified from sorting the OAQPS database were obtained. These hard copies
were used for this work effort. Source Classification Codes (SCC), process description, type of process,
and data quality ratings were extracted from the OAQPS database when possible. When a data quality
rating was not available, the reviewer assigned a rating based on OAQPS recommendations for
developing AP-42 emission factors.3 These ratings were based on the following criteria:
A. Multiple tests performed on the same source using sound methodology and reported in
enough detail for adequate validation
B. Tests that were performed by a generally sound methodology but lack enough detail for
adequate validation
C. Tests that were based on an untested or new methodology or that lacked a significant
amount of background data
D. Tests that were based on a generally unacceptable method but may provide an order-of-
magnitude value for the source
Detail for validation includes adequate source operation information, sampling protocols, and raw data
and calculations.
5
-------
The review of the test reports indicated that much of the information needed to evaluate control
effectiveness was not reported. Additional specific data were requested from eight plants to fill in
hardware information not found in the test reports. Three responses were received. Prior Coated Metals
(link code - dfn002) supplied all requested additional information including date control device was
installed, design residence time, design destruction efficiency, demonstrated destruction efficiency, and
incinerator support fuel. Gomar Manufacturing (link code - csOQl) supplied all requested additional
information including date control device was installed, design flow rate, design residence time, design
operating temperature, design destruction efficiency, demonstrated destruction efficiency, and
incinerator support fuel. Keuffel & Esser (link code - pgl) replied that the device was no longer
operating and the facility was being closed. The additional data received are included in the summary
pages in Appendix B.
2.2 EXPLANATION OF INPUT FORM
A database was built in dBASE IV, which allows flexibility in preparing different reports based
on the end users' needs. dBASE IV also allows sorting of the fields which will facilitate analysis. Input
data were split between two dBASE files which are linked by an arbitrary reference code. This format
allows analysis of plant and control device performance at a specific set of conditions and comparison of
results as these conditions change (e.g., as the control device ages, catalyst changes). Plant specific data
were entered in a file named PLANT. DBF, which contains information about the plant and control
device detailed in the test report. Although only one control device is usually tested in each test report,
reports with multiple control devices tested will have separate records and link codes for each control
device. Test and pollutant specific data were entered into a file named TESTS.DBF, which contains
information specific to measurements made during a source test. A single test report will generally
contain three separate tests of a control device, usually on the same day. All fields in the OAQPS
database were retained, except those that may be calculated by the end user as the situation requires.
Emission rates are reported in pounds of carbon per hour (lb C/h) obviating the need for UNITS_EM
6
-------
field in the OAQPS database. Furthermore, the VOC test method usually dictates the sampling train;
therefore, the TRAIN field was eliminated. EM_FACTOR and EF_UNITS fields were not used.
Emission factors may be reconstructed in a new report using the usage rate units, though these units may
not be identical to the original OAQPS database.
Input forms were developed to mirror the two database files, PLANT.DBF and TEST.DBF.
Blank input forms are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Definitions used for these forms are provided in
Appendix A. Some fields on each form may not be applicable to a specific facility but the fields were
retained to keep all information in a common database. An arbitrary link code was included on both
forms to allow test-specific data to be linked with plant-specific data. The plant form includes plant
name and address to facilitate possible future contacts. The plant form also contains the data quality
rating and manufacturing information such as SCO and process description, and control device
information. This information allows a user to segregate the effects of process changes that may result in
different gas compositions. The test form contains the plant name and city to provide continuity for the
user. The test form contains information pertinent to a specific run including solvent usage rate, gas flow
rates, solvent gas phase concentration, and test methods. Inlet and outlet temperatures on the test input
forms are recorded from the sample points and do not necessarily reflect the control device operating
temperature or the catalyst AT, For the purposes of this database, inlet catalyst temperature was used as
the control device operating temperature for catalytic incinerators and used to calculate actual volumetric
flow necessary to estimate residence time. Emission rates, destruction and removal efficiency (DRE),
and capture efficiency are calculated from the test data.
7
-------
VOC Control Effectiveness
Plant Worksheet
Internal Report Code
Plant Name
Address
Address
Plant City
Plant State
Plant ZIP Code
Test Date (mm/dd/vvvv)
Agency
Data Quality Rating
SCC
Process Description
Type of Process
Line Designation
CF.M/Monitoring Device Installed
Control Device Designation
Control Deviee Type
Manufacturer
Date Installed (mm/dd/yyyy")
Design Gas Flow Rate fdscfm")
Design Residence Time (s)
Design Operating Temperature (°F)
Design Efficiency (%)
Demonstrated Efficiency (%)
Fuel
Sorbent/Catalvst Type
Sorbent/Catalyst Age (vr)
Notes
Figure 2. Blank plant input form.
8
-------
VOC Control Effectiveness
Test Worksheet
Internal Report Code
Plant Name
Plant City
Test Date
Test Time (hh:.mm)
Pollutant
Test Designation
Average Operating Temperature (°F)
Device Residence Time
Catalyst AT ( °F)
Sorbent Regeneration Time (h)
Solvent Test Method (EPA 24,...)
Solvent Pollutant Content f#C/sal. #C/#)
Solvent Usage Rate (gal/h. #/h)
Usage Rate Units
YOC Test Method (EPA 25. EPA 25A. EPA 18-.-.)
Inlet Concentration (C ppmv dry")
Outlet Concentration (C ppmv dry)
Other Methods (EPA 1-4,...)
Inlet Flow Rate (dscfm)
Outlet Flow Rate (dscfm)
Inlet Temperature (°F)
Outlet Temperature f °F)
Inlet Emission Rate (# C/h)
Outlet Emission Rate (# C/h)
DRE (%)
Total Enclosure? (Y/N)
Capture Efficiency (%)
Overall Emission Rate (# C/h)
Overall Control Efficiency (%)
Notes
Figure 3. Blank test input form.
9
-------
2.3 EXPLANATION OF OUTPUT FORM
A summary page was generated from the dBASE IV files for each plant from the linked records.
An example summary page is shown in Figure 4, The upper half of the summary page contains data
specific to the plant and control device. The bottom half of the summary page contains the test specific
information and the average operational and effectiveness data calculated from the individual test runs.
An ASCII file report was generated by a dBASE IV program, and this file was imported into
WordPerfect 5.1 through a macro to create the summary pages. Tests were performed by a dBASE IV
program to distinguish inapplicable fields and not reported fields. If a tested numerical field contained
zero, it was incorrectly identified as unreported because dBASE IV reads empty numerical fields as zero.
This may occur if the sample temperature or the operating temperature is zero—an unlikely event for the
control devices of interest. The format of this summary page is not necessarily optimal for all users. A
user may choose to create a different dBASE report and/or a new Wordperfect macro to accommodate
different content or style. An explanation of individual fields is presented in Appendix A. Summary
pages for reviewed reports are presented in Appendix B.
10
-------
Page No. 2
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE CS002
FACILITY Alcan Building Products
ADDRESS 11 Cragwood Road
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
TEST DATE 01/04/1990
AGENCY NJDEP
RATING B
SCC 402900XX
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
primer coating oven/topcoater oven
aluminum strip coating
NJ3
catalytic incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
0.082
800
95.00
n/r
natural gas
CSM Systems
0
NOTES
Sorbent catalyst type is CSM Systems Inc. 378 ft2/ft3
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
CAPTURE
DRE EFFIC
% %
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
THC
THC
THC
AVERAGE
1 350 445 660 n/r
2 350 430 640 n/r
3 350 442 595 n/r
300
265
265
4450.00
4125.00
5416.00
620.00
720.00
510.00
197.203
185.873
243.037
30.131
34.588
25.450
84.72
81.39
89.53
85.21
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
Figure 4. Example summary page
-------
SECTION 3
RESULTS
3.1 SORTING RESULTS
The dBASE III Plus file contained 394 records representing a first-cut sort of the OAQPS
database to eliminate specific non-VOC sources. The dBASE file was further sorted to eliminate the
remaining non-VOC sources, which consisted primarily of acid gases and resulted in the rejection of 88
records. The remaining records were sorted again to remove sources containing "none" in the
C_DEVICE field. This sort eliminated an additional 56 records from consideration. The remaining
records were then sorted to focus on the control devices of interest to this study—thermal incinerators,
catalytic incinerators, and carbon adsorbers. This sort resulted in the elimination of 120 records from
consideration. The rejected records consisted primarily of unspecified control devices, particulate
control devices, acid gas scrubbers, and condensers. Non-surface-coating records were separated from
the remaining records leaving 63 records from the original 394. Of these 63 records, 47 were associated
with thermal or unspecified incinerators, 14 were associated with catalytic incinerators, and two were
associated with carbon adsorbers. These records correspond with only 43 actual test reports, some
reports being associated with more than one record. Of the 35 reports reviewed previously, only 17
reports were applicable to this work based on the sort criteria. The remaining 26 reports were
reproduced from OAQPS hardcopies.
12
-------
These reports were reviewed with the objective of obtaining data to fill in this database. Several
fields in the OAQPS database were copied into this database if information was unavailable including
address elements, process description, type of process, SCC, and quality ratings. In reviewing reports,
several fields in the original OAQPS database were found to be in error or missing. A plant
identification code had been substituted for the ZIP Code in several instances. In addition, some records
were incorrectly labeled as having no control device. Many data quality ratings were also missing from
the OAQPS database, which were added consistent with ratings of reports in hand. In several cases, the
report was missing sections that may contain some design or operating data. All reports were reviewed
as received. A brief review of each report is presented in Appendix C with the identifying link code.
3.2 ANALYSIS OF DATA
Of the 43 reports identified by the sorting process, data for 36 control devices were retained from
34 test reports as probable surface coaters. Several reports contained inadequate descriptions for the
reviewer to eliminate them as non-surface coaters and were therefore retained. Much of the facility data
desired for the database were missing from the reports. Data recovered from the reports are summarized
in Figures 5 and 6. The number of source tests containing each datum is indicated with the number of
pertinent tests. For example, control device manufacturer was identified in 23 of the 36 total source
tests, and catalyst AT was reported in 8 of the 13 catalytic incinerator source tests.
One intention of this task was to recover data from available test reports to show the effect of
control device age on control device effectiveness. Repeat testing data were only available for one
facility (Unifoil) at test times greater than 1 year apart; however, the two reports were not of comparable
quality. An alternative to same plant testing data is to compare device operation with design parameters.
Only four of the site test reports contained design efficiency, and only one report sufficiently identified
the age (new) of the control device. Age and design efficiency of two additional control devices were
obtained by contacting test sites. Prior Coated Metals (link code - dfn002) and Oomar Manufacturing
(link code - csOOl), plants with thermal incinerators installed 7 years before the reviewed tests,
-------
Plant Worksheet
36/36
Plant Name
29/36
Address
36/36
Plant City
6/36
Plant State
26/36
Plant ZIP Code
36/36
Test Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
36/36
Agency
36/36
see
35/36
Control Device Type
23/36
Manufacturer
1/36
Date Installed (mm/dd/yyyy)
8/36
Design Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)
6/36
Design Residence Time (s)
13/36
Design Operating Temperature (°F)
4/36
Design Efficiency (%)
0/36
Demonstrated Efficiency (%)
13/35
Fuel
5/14
Sorbent/Catalyst Type
1/14
Sorbent/Catalyst Age (yr)
Figure 5. Summary of plant data recovered,
14
-------
Test Worksheet
29/36
Test Time
36/36
Pollutant
n/a
Test Designation
12/36
Average Operating Temperature (°F)
n/a
Device Residence Time (s)
8/13
Catalyst AT (°F)
0/1
Sorbent Regeneration Time (h)
n/a
Solvent Test Method (EPA 24,.,,)
13/36
Solvent Pollutant Content (#C/gal, #C/#)
27/36
Solvent Usage Rate (gal/h, #/h)
n/a
Usage Rate Units
31/36
VOC Test Method (EPA 25, EPA 25A, EPA 18,...)
34/36
Inlet Concentration (C ppmv dry)
36/36
Outlet Concentration (C ppmv dry)
34/36
Inlet Flow rate (dscfm)
36/36
Outlet Flow rate (dscfm)
33/36
Inlet Temperature <°F)
35/36
Outlet Temperature (°F)
Figure 6. Summary of test data recovered.
15
-------
demonstrated 94 and 99 percent DRE, respectively, compared to 99 percent design efficiency. Graphic
Packaging Corporation (link code - pg6), a plant with a new catalytic incinerator, demonstrated 97
percent DRE with a design efficiency presumed, though not given, to be 95 percent. This small sample
should not be interpreted as representative of a large population of VOC control devices.
Many of the test reports used New Jersey Air Toxics methods (NJ 3.), which are generally
comparable to EPA VOC methods. The New Jersey methods include a continuous emission monitor
method analogous to EPA 25A (NJ 3.7) and a grab sample gas chromatograph method comparable to
EPA 18 (NJ 3.9)4 In the OAQPS database, tests based on New Jersey methods were rated equivalent in
data quality to tests based on EPA methods. The New Jersey methods and the EPA methods were
assumed to be equivalent in this study as well. If test methods required by specific state or local
agencies are not in fact equivalent, a bias on emissions and control effectiveness may result
corresponding to the geographical location of a group of VOC sources.
Difficulties were encountered with unreliable solvent usage rates. Usage rates were primarily
based on plant production rates and average solids "laydown." Varying solids content, VOC
composition, and uncertainty in laydown may result in unreliable estimates of solvent usage resulting in
unreliable estimates of capture efficiency. This may result in varying capture efficiencies or capture
efficiencies that are biased either above or below actual levels. Capture efficiencies greater than 100
percent were seen in this task; however, this may also be attributable to poor inlet emission estimates.
Moreover, solvent/coating usage was occasionally provided without composition information, making it
difficult to compare with lb C/h obtained from EPA Methods 25 and 25A. New Jersey facilities are often
required to compare solvent usage to the sum of all speciated inlet emissions for capture calculations.
This method does not account for compounds below detection limits (BDL) or for compounds not
specified for analysis. Furthermore, capture efficiency may be different for different compounds.
Speciated emissions were not added together for capture estimates under this task.
16
-------
Six facilities were considered to have 100 percent capture because they met "EPA procedure T"
type requirements for total enclosure.5 Some facilities achieve significant VOC destruction between the
application point and the control device inlet sampling point, usually via incineration in the heater or the
bake-off oven. If the inlet sample point emissions were used for capture determination, the VOCs
destroyed in the incinerator would appear as fugitives despite actually being destroyed. Total enclosure
ensures that all the solvent used is sent to the control device. Capture efficiency will be underestimated
for plants achieving VOC destruction between the application point and the inlet sample point but not
documenting total enclosure. Sufficient information was available to estimate capture efficiency for 11
additional facilities.
Speciated data often result in BDL concentrations in the condensate or the bag. Use of the
detection limit in such cases not only biases emission estimates but significantly biases DRE, sometimes
resulting in negative DRE at low inlet concentrations. Although the use of zero in these cases may
slightly bias emissions, it may more accurately represent DRE while not affecting an air shed's emissions
because the specific emission rate is low. Zero was used in this database at the discretion of the
reviewer.
Several reports also had anomalous flow rates where the outlet flow rate was found to be
substantially less than the inlet flow rate. This situation may result from poor data quality or poor
closure around the system. Assuming the data are of adequate quality, gas may be leaking from the duct
between the inlet and outlet sample ports. If this occurs after the control device, outlet emissions are
being underestimated resulting in high DRE. If the leak occurs before the control device, inlet emissions
are being overestimated resulting in underestimated DRE and overestimated capture efficiency.
Reports reviewed indicated one test on one carbon adsorber, 13 tests on catalytic incinerators, 21
tests on thermal incinerators, and one type unidentified incinerator. Twenty-eight tests were conducted
in New Jersey, seven in Pennsylvania, and one in Texas—representing a fairly geographically biased
population. The results may be biased from the general population of control devices installed on
-------
surface coating operations because of local process types, solvent composition, regulations, auditing
requirements, weather, etc. Furthermore, the amount of data recovered may not be representative of a
large population of test reports because reporting requirements may vary with location. Thirteen of the
tests had data rated "C," which may not be suitable for inventory purposes. The carbon adsorber facility
reviewed contained speciated data for chloroform resulting in 98 percent DRE, The data quality was
rated "A."
Catalytic incinerators are generally required to meet 95 percent DRE, which is reflected in
design efficiency. The average DRE for five catalytic incineration facilities based on TGNMO was 93
percent with a range of between 88 and 98 percent. The average DRE for seven catalytic incinerators
based on THC was 96 percent with a range between 85 and 100 percent. The average DREs using only
"A" and "B" quality data were 92 (n = 3) and 95 (n = 3) percent with ranges of 88 to 98 percent and 85 to
100 percent for TGNMO and THC, respectively.
Thermal incinerators are generally capable of 99+ percent DRE, which is also reflected in design
efficiency. The average DRE for five thermal incinerators based on TGNMO was 96 percent with a
range between 92 and 99 percent. The average DRE for 13 thermal incinerators based on THC was 92
percent with a range between 53 and 99 percent. The average DREs using only "A" and "B" quality data
were 96 (n = 4) and 91 (n = 11) percent with ranges of 92 to 99 percent and 53 to 100 percent for
TGNMO and THC, respectively.
3.3 DISCUSSION OF REMAINING DATA GAPS
The report review revealed many data gaps. Some of the missing data may be obtained from
either plant contacts or reviewing permit applications from appropriate authorities. Most of the reports
were prepared in response to permit requirements, generally permits to build or modify an existing
control device. Correspondence between the state agency and the facility concerning test protocol and
test dates was generally available. The state or local agency may require other conditions in addition to a
source test including operating temperature and residence time. The facilities' responses to requirements
18
-------
other than demonstrated DRE and capture and/or the data resulting from compliance to these other
provisions were not generally available in the test report. Information that may be obtained by
contacting the state agency or the facility includes control device design information, control device
installation date, demonstrated DRE, and some operating information that may be archived, principally
operating temperatures.
In addition to data that may be available through direct plant contacts, many data gaps exist that
will not be recoverable. These include information such as usage rates, carbon content of
solvent/coating, and total enclosure verification. This information would have to be obtained while
testing or on the coating/solvent being used. It is recommended that information sufficient to express
solvent usage as lb C/h be included in test reports because EPA Method 25,25A, and 18 results may all
be reduced to this format. Comparison of inlet emissions to solvent usage may illustrate response factor
problems and/or solvent usage rate inaccuracy. However, because of state and local regulations, many
plants provided solvent information in terms of total weight of VOC or volatile organic substance
without regard to carbon content. Furthermore, the solvent may be analyzed only for the solvents
specified by the state or local agency and omit other VOC. Usage data in this format cannot be
compared effectively with THC or TGNMO inlet emissions because of unknown carbon composition of
the solvent. Because testing was generally done for permitting purposes, testing and analysis were
performed as specified at the state level. The frequency and quality of solvent usage and solvent
composition information needed to estimate capture efficiency, reflected in this report, may not be
representative of a broad population of test reports because the available reports were predominantly
from New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
19
-------
SECTION 4
CONCLUSIONS
The following can be concluded from the assessment of existing test reports for evaluating VOC
control effectiveness:
• From the 394 records supplied, 36 site tests were appropriate for review under this task.
• The 36 site tests included one on carbon absorption, 13 on catalytic incineration, 21 on
thermal incineration, and one unidentified incineration facility.
• Four of the 36 facilities reviewed contained design efficiencies while only one of the 36
facilities contained adequate information to establish control device age.
• Two of the 36 facilities reviewed contained only outlet data.
• The data quality for 13 of the 36 facilities reviewed were rated "C" in the OAQPS database.
• Average DUE of catalytic incinerators reviewed based on tests rated as "A" and "B" quality
TGNMO data was 92 percent.
• Average DRE of catalytic incinerators reviewed based on tests rated as "A" and "B" quality
THC data was 95 percent.
• Average DRE of thermal incinerators reviewed based on tests rated as "A" and "B" quality
TGNMO data was 96 percent.
• Average DRE of thermal incinerators reviewed based on tests rated as "A" and "B" quality
THC data was 91 percent.
20
-------
Information on control device age was not generally reported though most reports reviewed
had new or recently modified control devices.
Plant-specific information may be obtained by appropriate personnel by contacting the
facility and state.
Control effectiveness could not be ascertained from the reviewed reports because of the
scarcity of design and installation information available.
21
-------
SECTION 5
RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquiring additional data from other states or geograpMcal areas would help to develop a well-
rounded population. Reports from different states will indicate whether the completeness and data
quality issues noted are common. If similar problems arise with new reports, follow-up contacts with
facilities or regulating agencies would help to fill in data to facilitate comparisons with either design
values or previous test results. Selective follow-up testing of facilities may be required to evaluate
control effectiveness. Additional data from other reports would allow analysis based on geographic area,
as well as more representative populations of each control device type. Emissions and DRE could be
compared to other databases, such as the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS)6, to estimate
the extent of degradation from facility estimates of control efficiency.
Adding certain data to future test reports may also be helpful in evaluating control effectiveness
and emission inventories. Hardware information such as installation date and design efficiency would
aid in evaluating control device degradation. Information sufficient to convert solvent usage rates to
solvent carbon usage rates would be useful to estimate capture efficiency in many facilities.
A long-term goal could be the development of a VOC control device inventory. This would be
useful to many agencies and locales for various analyses. It could serve as the basis for development of
other inventories relating to control effectiveness.
22
-------
SECTION 6
REFERENCES
1. Vogel, C.A. (EP A/NRMRL-RTP), to Brent W. Hall, February 15,1993.
2. Myers, R.E. (EPA/OAQPS), Personal communication with Carl Singer, March 15, 1993.
3. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, 4th edition, AP-42, September 1985, GPO Stock
No. 055-000-00251-7, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
4. Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, Appendix A, July 1,1991, EPA Methods 18,
25 A.
5. Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 30.
6. AIRS, Aerometric Information Retrieval System, User's Guide AA1:Introduction, August 1993,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
23
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
FORM DEFINITIONS
A 1
-------
VOC Control Effectiveness
Plant Worksheet
Internal Report Code
Plant Name
Address
Address
Plant Citv
Plant State
Plant ZIP Code
Test Date (mm/dd/vvvv)
Agency
Data Quality Rating
see
Process Description
Type of Process
Line Designation
CEM/Monitoring Device Installed
Control Device Designation
Control Device Type
Manufacturer
Date InstalledCmm/dd/yyyy)
Design Gas Flow Rate fdscfm)
Design Residence Time (si
Design Operating Temperature (°F)
Design Efficiency (%)
Demonstrated Efficiency (%)
Fuel
Sorbent/Catalyst Type
Sorbent/Catalvst Age (vr)
Notes
A-2
-------
Internal Report Code - Arbitrary code used to link PLANT.DBF and TEST.DBF databases.
Plant Name - Name of manufacturer and division.
Address - Mailing address of the manufacturing plant.
Plant City - City location of manufacturing plant.
Plant State - State location of the manufacturing plant.
Plant ZIP Code - ZIP Code at the manufacturing plant.
Test Date - Testing start date.
Agency - Governmental agency requiring the test.
Data Quality Rating - Data quality rating assigned to the report as per the draft EPA document,
"Technical Procedures for Developing AP-42 Emission Factors and Preparing AP-42 Sections,"
(March 6, 1992). When available, data quality ratings were retained from the OAQPS dBASE
files.
SCC - Source Classification Code as per the EPA document, NEDS Source Classification Codes
and Emission Factor Listing, (October 1985). This study used the SCC supplied in the OAQPS
dBASE files.
Process Description - Description of process (i.e., what is being manufactured).
Type of Process - Description of the application method.
Line Designation - Plant designation of the manufacturing lines being tested.
Control Device Designation - Plant designation of the VOC control device being tested.
CEM/Monitoring Device Installed - Type of device used by the plant to continuously monitor
control device performance.
Control Device Designation - Plant or report specification of the control device being tested.
This line inserted to avoid confusion when a plant uses more than one control device.
Control Device Type - Type of control device being tested. This database was limited to
thermal incinerator, catalytic incinerator, and carbon adsorber.
Manufacturer - Control device manufacturer.
Date Installed (dd/mm/yy) - Date control device was installed or put into service.
Design Gas Flow Rate - Flow rate at which control device was designed to operate.
Design Residence Time - Residence time in active zone of control device at design conditions.
Design Operating Temperature - Average temperature that control device was designed to
operate.
Design Efficiency - DRE control device manufacturer guarantees or claims device will operate
at under design conditions.
Demonstrated Efficiency - DRE demonstrated by testing after installation, typically required
for initial permit.
Fuel - Primary combustion or support fuel used in incinerator.
Sorbent/Catalyst Type - Type of carbon/sorbent used in sorption system or type of catalyst used
in catalytic incinerator system.
Sorbent/Catalyst Age - Calendar years between last change of sorbent or catalyst and testing.
Notes
A-3
-------
VOC Control Effectiveness
Test Worksheet
Internal Report Code
Plant Name
Plant Citv
Test Date
Test Time (hh:mm)
Pollutant
Test Designation
Average Operating Temperature (°F)
Device Residence Time (s)
Catalyst AT (°F)
Sorbent Regeneration Time (h)
Solvent Test Method (EPA 24,.,,)
Solvent Pollutant Content (#C/gal, #C/#)
Solvent Usage Rate (gal/h. #/h)
Usage Rate Units
VOC Test Method (EPA 25. EPA 25A, EPA 18,...)
Inlet Concentration (C ppmv dry)
Outlet Concentration (C ppmv dry)
Other Methods (EPA 1-4,
Inlet Flow Rate (dscfm)
Outlet Flow Rate fdscfm)
Inlet Temperature ( °F)
Outlet Temperature ( °F)
Inlet Emission Rate (# C/h)
Outlet Emission Rate (# C/h)
DRE (%)
Total Enclosure? (Y/N)
Capture Efficiency (%)
Overall Emission Rate (# C/h)
Overall Control Efficiency (%)
Notes
-------
VOC Control Effectiveness Test Worksheet
Internal Report Code - Arbitrary code used to link PLANT.DBF and TEST.DBF databases,
Plant Name - Name of manufacturer and division.
Plant City - City location of the manufacturing plant
Test Date - Testing start date.
Test Time (hh:mm) - Short international format of time at the beginning of the test ran.
Pollutant - Pollutant measured, generally dependent on the method of VOC analysis. TGNMO
was used for EPA 25 or equivalent, THC was used for EPA 25A or equivalent, and analyte
compound was used for EPA 18 or equivalent—sum of which was referred to as VOC.
Test Designation - Name used to designate the test, usually 1, 2, or 3.
Average Operating Temperature (°F) - Operating temperature in the active portion of the
control device. This would correspond to combustion zone temperature in a thermal incinerator,
catalyst inlet temperature in a catalytic incinerator, and average inlet and outlet gas temperatures
in a carbon adsorber.
Device Residence Time - Gas residence time in active portion of control device
Catalyst AT (:>F) - Temperature increase across catalyst bed in a catalytic incinerator.
Sorbent Regeneration Time (h) - Time period between taking a carbon bed off line and
returning it to service via actual regeneration cycle.
Solvent Test Method (EPA 24,...) - Method used to quantify VOC content of coating
Solvent Pollutant Content (#C/gaI, #C/#) - Organics content of the solvent as reported, units
consistent with solvent usage rate to yield #C/h, While volatiles and moisture may give enough
information for permit and emission factors, they are not adequate to quantify capture based on
carbon emissions as recovered from EPA 25 and EPA 25A. EPA 18 analysis can also be reduced
to a carbon basis and solvent composition and usage rate can be applied for each compound of
interest.
Solvent Usage Rate (gal/h, #/h) - Usage rate reported by plant.
Usage Rate Units - Units given for solvent usage,
VOC Test Method (EPA 25, EPA 25A, EPA 18,...) - Test method used to analyze for VOC.
Inlet Concentration (C ppniv dry) - Concentration of organics at the inlet sample point
converted to carbon equivalents.
Outlet Concentration (C ppniv dry) - Concentration of organics at the outlet sample point
converted to carbon equivalents.
Other Methods (EPA 1-4,...) - Test methods used to determine flow rate
Inlet Flow Rate (dsefm) - Average flue gas flow rate at the inlet sample point.
Outlet Flow Rate (dscfm) - Average flue gas flow rate at the outlet sample point.
Inlet Temperature (°F) - Average temperature at the inlet sample point.
Outlet Temperature (°F) - Average temperature at the outlet sample point.
Inlet Emission Rate (# C/h) - Emission rate at the inlet sample, point based on inlet
concentration and inlet flow rate.
Outlet Emission Rate (# C/h) - Emission rate at the outlet sample point based on outlet
concentration and outlet flow rate.
DRE (%) - Destruction/Removal efficiency based on inlet and outlet emission rates to the
control device.
Total Enclosure? (Y/N) - Logical variable to assign whether the line meets total enclosure
criteria established by EPA. Inclusion of this variable prevents destruction of VOC taking place
before the control device from being counted as fugitives by assuming 100 percent capture
efficiency. Destruction taking place before the inlet sample point will lower the observed
capture efficiency and raise overall emissions in facilities without total enclosure. Destruction of
A-5
-------
VOC prior to the inlet sample point is common when curing ovens are fired with or in the
vicinity of the flue gas.
Capture Efficiency (%) - Percentage of the VOCs used captured and sent to the control device
based on usage rate and inlet emissions.
Overall Emission Rate (# C/h) - Outlet emissions rate plus usage rate not captured and sent to
control device (fugitives).
Overall Control Efficiency (%) - Percentage of usage rate destroyed or removed.
Notes
A-6
-------
Plant Name - Name of manufacturer and division.
Address - Mailing address of the manufacturing plant.
City - City location of the manufacturing plant.
State - State location of the manufacturing plant.
ZIP Code - ZIP Code at the manufacturing plant.
Date - Date that testing began.
Agency - Governmental agency requiring the test.
Data Quality Rating - Data quality rating assigned to the report as per the draft EPA document,
"Technical Procedures for Developing AP-42 Emission Factors and Preparing AP-42 Sections,
(March 6, 1992).
SCC - Source Classification Code as per the EPA document, NEDS Source Classification Codes
and Emission Factor Listing, (October 1985).
Process Description - Description of process (i.e., what is being manufactured).
Process Type - Description of the application method.
Line Designation - Plant designation of the manufacturing lines being tested.
Control Device Designation - Plant designation of the VOC control device being tested.
Test Method - The VOC test method employed at both inlet and outlet during testing.
Control Device Type - Method employed to control VOC.
Control Device Manufacturer - Manufacturer of control device.
Date Installed - Date control device was installed.
Design Gas Flow Rate - Flow rate at which control device was designed to operate.
Design Residence Time - Residence time in active zone of control device at design conditions.
Design Operating Temperature - Average temperature control device was designed to operate
at.
Design Efficiency - DRE control device manufacturer guarantees or claims device will operate
at under design conditions.
Demonstrated Efficiency - DRE demonstrated by testing after installation, typically required
for initial permit.
Fuel - Primary combustion or support fuel used in incinerator.
Sorbent/Catalyst Type - Type of carbon/sorbent used in sorption system or type of catalyst used
in catalytic incinerator system.
Sorbent/Catalyst Age - Calendar years between last change of sorbent or catalyst and testing.
Pollutant - Pollutant being measured, usually defined by test method.
Test Designation - Run number assigned to test.
Inlet Temperature - Temperature at the inlet sample point.
Outlet Temperature - Temperature at the outlet sample point.
Operating Temperature - Average temperature in active zone of control device.
Residence T ime - Actual control device residence time for a specific test.
Catalyst AT - Temperature rise across catalyst bed in catalytic incinerator.
Inlet Concentration - Concentration of VOC at control device inlet sample location (ppmv C
equivalent dry basis). '
Outlet Concentration - Concentration of VOC at control device outlet sample location (ppmv C
equivalent dry basis).
Inlet Emissions - Flow rate of VOC flowing into control device at inlet sample location (#C/h)
Outlet Emissions - Flow rate of VOC flowing out of control device at outlet sample location
(#C/h).
DRE - Destruction/Removal Efficiency of the control device; percentage of inlet emissions
destroyed or removed by the control device.
Input Rate - Rate of VOC usage on the manufacturing lines tested (# C/h).
A-7
-------
Capture Efficiency - Percentage of the input rate that gets captured and is therefore subject to
control.
Overall Control Effectiveness - Percentage of the input rate destroyed or removed.
Average DRE - Arithmetic average of DRE for a specific pollutant and control device in this
report.
Average Capture Efficiency - Arithmetic average of capture efficiency for a specific pollutant
and grouping of manufacturing lines.
Average Overall Control Effectiveness - Arithmetic average of overall control effectiveness
for a specific pollutant, control device, and manufacturing line in the report.
A-8
-------
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY PAGES
B-l
-------
Page No.
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn012
Ciba-Geigy Corporation
556 Morris Avenue
Summit, NJ 07901
05/07/1991
NJDEP
A
402999xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
laminator coater w/carbon absorber
coat polyester adhesive
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
NJ Stackl56 DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
NJAT Method 3.9 DESIGN EFFIC (%)
carbon absorption
VIC Manufacturing
n/r
2400.00
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
140
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
NOTES
No audit samples analyzed in sample analysis. Design operating temperature is 95-185.
POLLUTANT
chloroform
chloroform
chloroform
AVERAGE
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
94
97
97
97
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
560.00
470.00
690.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
0.41
1.70
1.70
2.648
2.135
2 . 916
0.002
0.007
0.007
99 . 92
99 . 67
99 .76
99.78
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
99.9
99 . 6
99 . 6
99.7
NOTES:
Units for solvent pollutant content are #C/#. Outlet emission rate is 0.002.
Units for solvent pollutant content are #C/#.
Units for solvent pollutant content are #C/#.
Outlet emission rate is 0.007.
Outlet emission rate is 0.007.
W
I
K>
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 2
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
cs002
Alcan Building Products
11 Cragwood Road
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
01/04/1990
NJDEP
B
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
primer coating oven/topcoater oven
aluminum strip coating
NJ3
catalytic incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
0.082
800
95.00
n/r
natural gas
CSM Systems
0 .
NOTES
Sorbent catalyst type is CSM Systems Inc. 378 ft2/ft3.
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET OPER
deg F deg F deg F
350
350
350
445
430
442
660
640
595
RESIDENCE
TIME
s
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
300
265
265
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
4450.00
4125.00
5416.00
ppmv C
620.00
720.00
510.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
197.203
185.873
243.037
#C/h
30.131
34.588
25.450
AVERAGE
DRE
84.72
81.39
89 . 53
85.21
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 3
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
pg2
Apollo Metals, Inc.
Bethlehem, PA
TEST DATE 01/07/1988
AGENCY PaDER
RATING B
SCC 40201801
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
metal coating incinerator
sheet metal coating
towers 2 and 4
catalytic
EPA25
catalytic incinerator
n/r
5000.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES
Agency is PaDER R3. Design gas flow rate is in sefm.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
141
143
143
339
347
349
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
3788.10
4140.80
3509.60
290.10
239.80
409.80
31.747
32.884
27.923
2.725
2.232
3 .734
AVERAGE
91.42
93 .21
86.63
90.42
55 . 09
48.20
40.93
48.07
50.4
44.9
35.5
43 . 6
NOTES:
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#.
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/# MABC-60.
W
I
4^
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No.
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg3
Apollo Metals, Inc.
Bethlehem, PA
07/06/1988
PaDER
A
40201801
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
metal coating incinerator
sheet metal coating
tower #2, tower #4
catalytic i
EPA25
catalytic incinerator
n/r
5000.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES
Agency is PaDER R3.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
113
174
194
382
370
349
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
62.5
65
52 .5
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
3588.00
2129.00
2498.00
313.00
328.00
230.00
26.316
15.599
17.912
2 .480
2 .492
1.778
DRE
90 . 58
84.02
90.07
88.22
CAPTURE
EFFIC
100.66
59.67
68.52
76.28
Solvent usage average of whole day. Solvent test method EPA24 mass balance, MAB-60 lacquer.
Catalyst delta T average of before and after time of run. Solvent test method EPA 24 mass balance,
MAB-60 lacquer.
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
91.2
50. 1
61.7
67.7
Solvent test method EPA 24 mass balance MAB-60 lacquer.
ttf
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No.
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn017
Crown Roll Leaf
Paterson, NJ
08/09/1988
NJDEP
C
40201301
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Rotogravure Printing
NJStack 005
catalytic incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES NJ Method 3.9: impingers and Tedlar bag. Specific VOC destruction efficiencies: Methyl Ethyl
Ketone 68%, Toluene 95%, Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 35% (one run <0> , C2H50H 91%, Acetone 60%. No usage
rate available for production rate. Analyses of standards and samples transcripted manually for
field data. No documentation for sample collection. No documentation of bias on drift checks in
sample analysis. All calculations handwritten, but audit OK on finalized data. No certification of
traceability on calibration gases.
No field data. No documentation of sample collection or analysis. Acetone 0.60 lb/hour, Isopropyl
Alcohol 0.12 lb/hour, Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.11 lb/hour, Naptha 3.8 lb/hour.
Many pages missing from this copy of report.
W
I
ON
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
117
115
116
351
354
356
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
675
675
675
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
3415.00
3360.00
3432.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
160.20
154.20
153.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
68.375
67.199
68.792
#C/h
3 .341
3 .216
3 .105
AVERAGE
95. 11
95.21
95.49
95.27
CAPTURE
EFFIC
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
acetone 1 117 351 n/r n/r 675 1939.00 133.00 38.823 2.774 92.85 n/r n/r
acetone 2 115 354 n/r n/r 675 1243.00 121.60 24.860 2.536 89.80 n/r n/r
acetone 3 116 356 n/r n/r 675 1918.00 126.00 38.445 2.557 93.35 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 92.00 n/r n/r
ethanol 1 117 351 n/r n/r 675 310.00 1.37 6.207 0.029 99.53 n/r n/r
ethanol 2 115 354 n/r n/r 675 307.00 1.14 6.140 0.024 99.61 n/r n/r
ethanol 3 116 356 n/r n/r 675 300.00 1.14 6.013 0.023 99.62 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 99.59 n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 1 117 351 n/r n/r 675 3.60 0.64 0.072 0.013 81.94 n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 2 115 354 n/r n/r 675 2.00 0.48 0.040 0.010 75.00 n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 3 116 356 n/r n/r 675 3.60 0.40 0.072 0.008 88.89 n/r n/r
(continued)
-------
Page No. 6
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn017
Crown Roll Leaf
Paterson, NJ
08/09/1988
NJDEP
C
40201301
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Rotogravure Printing
NJStack 005
catalytic incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC {%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/ CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES NJ Method 3.9: impingers and tedlar bag. Specific VOC destruction efficiencies: Methyl Ethyl
Ketone 68%, Toluene 95%, Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 35% (one run <0), C2H50H 91%, Acetone 60%. No usage
rate available for production rate. Analyses of standards and samples transcripted manually for
field data. No documentation for sample collection. No documentation of bias on drift checks in
sample analysis. All calculations handwritten, but audit OK on finalized data. No certification of
traceability on calibration gases.
No field data. No documentation of sample collection or analysis. Acetone 0.60 lb/hour, Isopropyl
Alcohol 0.12 lb/hour, Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.11 lb/hour, Naptha 3.8 lb/hour.
Many pages missing from this copy of report.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
CAPTURE
EFFIC
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
CO
AVERAGE
methyl ethyl ketone 1
methyl ethyl ketone 2
methyl ethyl ketone 3
AVERAGE
117
115
116
351
354
356
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
675
675
675
418.00
242.00
394.00
10. 10
9 .14
8.86
8 .369
4 . 840
7 . 897
0.211
0 .191
0.180
81.94
97.48
96.05
97.72
97.08
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 1 117 351 n/r n/r 675 502.00 13.05 10.051 0.272 97.29 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 2 115 354 n/r n/r 675 300.20 12.10 6.004 0.252 95.80 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 3 116 356 n/r n/r 675 525.00 10.23 10.523 0.208 98.02 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 97.04 n/r n/r
toluene 1 117 351 n/r n/r 675 1680.00 12.80 33.637 0.267 99.21 n/r n/r
toluene 2 115 354 n/r n/r 675 980.00 9.10 19.600 0.190 99.03 n/r n/r
toluene 3 116 356 n/r n/r 675 1823.00 10.50 36.541 0.213 99.42 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 99.22 n/r n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 7
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg6
Graphic Packaging Corporation
Cedar Hollow Rd & Matthews Rd
Paoli, PA
12/09/1986
R3
C
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
printing; flexographic & rotogravure: catalytic incinerator
rotogravure printing
#8 Zerand press
EPA25
catalytic incinerator
M & W Industries
10/01/1986
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
magnesium oxide
n/r
NOTES
Temperature data not found in data sheets, usage rates for individual runs were missing and the
usage rates appear to be average.
Agency is Pennsylvania Dept. of Natural Resources.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
100
105
105
424
424
424
549
549
549
n/r
n/r
n/r
INLET
ppmv C
171
171
171
5403.00
5449.00
5575.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
107.00
129.00
184.00
INLET
#C/h
67.635
66.517
68.117
OUTLET
#C/h
1. 554
1.861
2 . 660
AVERAGE
DRE
97 .70
97.20
96.09
97.00
CAPTURE
EFFIC
73 . 90
72 . 68
74.43
73 . 67
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
72 .2
70.7
71.5
71.5
NOTES:
Coating contains V-1256, V-31319, L-1616, 86R494, NP Acetate, Ethyl Acetate,
assumed constant for the runs.
Application rates
to
i
oo
Solvent test method: mass balance, 24A, ASTMD 2369-73, ASTMD 3272-76.
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#coating.
Solvent test method: mass balance, 24A, ASTMD 2369-73, ASTMD 3272-76.
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#coating.
Solvent test method: mass balance, 24A, ASTMD 2369-73,
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#coating.
ASTMD 3272-76.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No.
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg4
Owens Illinois Closure Inc.
70 Sewell St.
Glassboro, NJ 08028
11/18/1987
NJDEP
B
402xxxxx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
Coater
Sheet metal coating oven
T, litho coater line 029
NJ3 .
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
N.G./propane
platinum
n/r
NOTES
There is not sufficient data on how the % Carbon was determined for lacquer.
POLLUTANT
ethyl benzene
ethyl benzene
ethyl benzene
AVERAGE
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
170 833
168 843
1690 841
590
590
590
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
310
310
310
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
220.00
230.00
251.00
ppmv C
12 .00
0.63
6.40
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
2.364
2 .458
2.860
0 .147
0.008
0.080
DRE
93 .78
99.67
97.20
96 . 88
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
15 .13
14.13
16 . 52
15.26
14.2
14 .1
16 .1
14 . 8
isophrone 1 170 833 590 n/r 310 117.00 1.44 1.257 0.018 98.57 8.00 7.9
isophrone 2 168 843 590 n/r 310 140.00 0.13 1.496 0.002 99.87 8.06 8.1
isophrone 3 169 841 590 n/r 310 140.00 0.09 1.595 0.001 99.94 9.32 9.3
AVERAGE 99.46 8.46 8.4
NOTES: 2 Outlet concentration average of .088-.168 range given.
W
VD m-xylene 1 170 833 590 n/r 310 460.00 25.00 4.942 0.307 93.79 14.78 13.9
m-xylene 2 168 843 590 n/r 310 461.00 11.00 4.927 0.135 97.26 12.63 12.3
m-xylene 3 169 841 590 n/r 310 512.00 13.00 5.834 0.162 97.22 14.96 14.5
AVERAGE 96.09 14.12 13.6
methyl isobutyl keto 1 170 833 590 n/r 310 286.00 10.39 3.073 0.128 95.83 21.99 21.1
methyl isobutyl keto 2 168 843 590 n/r 310 310.00 2.70 3.313 0.033 99.00 21.88 21.7
methyl isobutyl keto 3 169 841 590 n/r 310 315.00 2.21 3.590 0.028 99.22 22.75 22.6
AVERAGE 98.02 22.21 21.8
NOTES: 2 Outlet concentration average of 3.05-2.34 range given.
o-xylene 1 170 833 590 n/r 310 168.00 11.00 1.805 0.135 92.52 13.48 12.5
o-xylene 2 168 843 590 n/r 310 170.00 6.30 1.817 0.077 95.76 11.80 11.3
o-xylene 3 169 841 590 n/r 310 191.00 6.70 2.177 0.083 96.19 12.72 12.2
AVERAGE 94.82 12.67 12.0
(continued)
-------
Page No. 9
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg4
Owens Illinois Closure Inc.
7 0 Sewell St.
Glassboro, NJ 08028
11/18/1987
NJDEP
B
402xxxxx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Coater
Sheet metal coating oven
T, litho coater line 029
NJ3 .
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL N.G./propane
SORBENT/CATALYST platinum
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES
There is not sufficient data on how the % Carbon was determined for lacquer.
POLLUTANT
p-xylene
p-xylene
p-xylene
AVERAGE
TEST
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET OPER
deg F deg F
170
168
169
833
843
841
RESIDENCE
TIME
deg F s
590 n/r
590 n/r
590 n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
310
310
310
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
191.00
201.00
222.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
11.00
4.90
6.20
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
2 . 052
2 . 148
2 . 530
0.135
0 . 060
0.077
DRE
93.42
97.21
96.96
95.86
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
14 .15
13.18
15.40
14.24
13 .2
12 . 8
14 . 9
13 .7
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 10
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE dfn009
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
Pittsburgh Metal Lithographing
409 Broad Street, Suite 205
Sewickley, PA 15143
08/24/1988
PaDER
C
40201801
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
metal coating line
coating line #1
EPA25
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
Coating VOC usage rate questionable - capture efficiencies >>100%. No documentation of sampling
equations or temperatures. No documentation of sampling temperature. No documentation of leak
checks. Plant tested located at Fallsington, PA.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
208
214
227
469
528
512
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
840
840
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
128.00
5114.00
6542.00
553.00
465.00
470.00
Delta temp, is measured at the inlet.
Delta temp, was measured at the inlet.
Delta temp, is measured at the inlet.
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
1. 645
67.608
84.050
DRE is approximately 393.
8.443
6 . 321
6.476
DRE
-413.25
90.65
92.30
-76.77
CAPTURE
EFFIC
2 . 72
127.32
110.88
80 .31
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
-11.3
115.4
102 .3
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 11
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg5
Pittsburgh Metal Lithography
Fallsington, PA
10/13/1988
Reg. 3
B
40201801
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
metal coating line; catalytic incinerator
metal coating line
coating line #2 catalytic inci
EPA25
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES VOC used found by change in weight of solvent and coating plus the change in weight of scraper drum
along with scraper drum concentration. Pgs. 13-70 seem to be missing. It is unclear whether there
is a catalyst and no delta T info, is included. Methods for determining moisture, velocity,
fluorite, temperature not temperature.
Process description: metal coating line, solvent and coating mixed.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO'
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
223
224
232
913
950
910
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/r
n/r
n/r
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
6601.00
4090.00
4255.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
180.00
64.00
68.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
64.343
39.723
42.284
1. 698
0 . 576
0 . 611
AVERAGE
DRE
97.36
98 . 55
98 . 56
98.16
CAPTURE
EFFIC
98 . 57
77.23
81. 81
85 . 87
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
96.0
76.1
80.6
84.2
W
i
NOTES:
1 Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#solvent.
2 Solvent pollutant content is in #C/(#solvent + lacquer).
3 Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#solvent.
n/a
n/r
data is not applicable.
data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 12
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn008
Roysons, Inc.
40 Van der Hoof Ave.
Rockaway, NJ 07866
12/11/1990
NJDEP
C
40500511
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
vinyl film coating
rotogravure printing
3 u 1 and 1 stock color print
NJ Stack002
NJAT Method 3.7
catalytic incinerator
EDA
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES Methyl isobutyl ketone 3.84 lb/hour-61.9 lb/ton; methyl ethyl ketone 79.4 lb/hour-1,280 lb/ton;
acetone 0.43 lb/hour; 6.93 lb/ton; toluene 6.70 lb/hour-108 lb/ton; Are "C" . No documentation of
field data. No calibration gases certifications. Capture efficiency of 94.29% reported, but not
documented.
-TEMPERATURE-
RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
THC
1
59
231
n/r
n/r
1
1556.00
35 . 30
32.609
0.905
97 .22
n/r
THC
2
62
233
n/r
n/r
1
1516.00
35.30
31.793
0.929
97 . 08
n/r
THC
3
62
235
n/r
n/r
1
1518.00
30.30
31.801
0.745
97 . 66
n/r
AVERAGE
97.32
n/r
NOTES:
1
Capture
efficiency calculated from sorbent usage and
sum (methyl
ethyl
ketone, methyl
isobutyl
ketone,
acetone,
toluene) inlet
emission
rates.
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
W
n/a
n/r
data is not applicable.
data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 13
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfnOll
Transco Products Corporation
609 West Elizabeth Avenue
Linden, NJ 07036
06/17/1991
NJDEP
C
402xxxxx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
curtain coating - nitrocellulose lacquer
metal parts coating
NJ Stack No. 001
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
(%)
n/r
600
n/r
n/r
natural gas
platinum impreg
n/r
NOTES No documentation of sample collection procedure used; method 5 procedures photocopied into report.
TOC ER 20.6 lb/hour, EF 1916 lb/ton; Butyl Acetate ER 0.06 lb/hour, EF 6 lb/ton; Toluene ER 0.11
lb/hour, EF 9.8 lb/ton; Methyl Ethyl Ketone ER 1.44 lb/hour, EF 134 lb/ton, Ethanol ER 0.62 lb/hour,
EF 58 lb/ton. No method 1 documentation of flow/stream analysis. Strip charts not labeled; no
system checks documented. No documentation of calibration gases.
Monitoring devices were installed: carbon monoxide, oxygen, CEMs, pre- and post-catalyst
temperature. Design gas flow rate was 1500 cfm/900 cfm::2 room/1 room operating. Design operating
temperature was taken at catalyst inlet. Sorbent/Catalyst was platinum impregnated.
W
i
£
AVERAGE
NOTES:
ethanol
ethanol
ethanol
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
THC
1
87
275
n/r
n/r
n/r
48800.00
1552.00
89.593
2 . 797
96.88
n/r
THC
2
88
270
n/r
n/r
n/r
37694.00
1647.00
74.397
3 . 094
95 . 84
n/r
THC
3
82
272
n/r
n/r
n/r
45385.00
2004.00
88.732
3 . 634
95 . 90
n/r
AVERAGE
96.21
n/r
butyl acetate
1
87
275
n/r
n/r
n/r
20.20
0.00
0 . 037
0.000
100.00
3.23
butyl acetate
2
88
270
n/r
n/r
n/r
18.80
0.00
0.037
0.000
100.00
3.23
butyl acetate
3
82
272
n/r
n/r
n/r
19 .50
0.00
0.038
0.000
100.00
3 . 31
100.00
3 . 26
Solvent pollutant content in #C/#.
DRE is <79.5.
Outlet
1.148 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate.
Outlet concentration is <4.2. Outlet emission rate is <0.0076.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#.
concentration is <4.2. Outlet emission rate is <0.0078. DRE is >79.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content in #C/#. Outlet
concentration is <3.9. Outlet emission rate is <0.007. DRE is >81.8.
87
82
275
270
272
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
83.50
228.00
190.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .153
0.450
0 . 371
0.000 100.00 5.28
0.000 100.00 15.54
0.000 100.00 12.81
100.00 11.21
2.896 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in
#C/#. Outlet concentration is <3.6. Outlet emission rate is <0.0064. DRE is >95.8.
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
5.3
15.5
12 . 8
11.2
(continued)
-------
Page No. 14
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfnOll
Transco Products Corporation
609 West Elizabeth Avenue
Linden, NJ 07036
06/17/1991
NJDEP
C
402xxxxx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
curtain coating - nitrocellulose lacquer
metal parts coating
NJ Stack No. 001
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
600
n/r
n/r
natural gas
platinum impreg
n/r
NOTES No documentation of sample collection procedure used; method 5 procedures photocopied into report.
TOC ER 20.6 lb/hour, EF 1916 lb/ton; Butyl Acetate ER 0.06 lb/hour, EF 6 lb/ton; Toluene ER 0.11
lb/hour, EF 9.8 lb/ton; Methyl Ethyl Ketone ER 1.44 lb/hour, EF 134 lb/ton, Ethanol ER 0.62 lb/hour,
EF 58 lb/ton. No method 1 documentation of flow/stream analysis. Strip charts not labeled; no
system checks documented. No documentation of calibration gases.
Monitoring devices were installed: carbon monoxide, oxygen, CEMs, pre- and post-catalyst
temperature. Design gas flow rate was 1500 cfm/900 cfm::2 room/1 room operating. Design operating
temperature was taken at catalyst inlet. Sorbent/Catalyst was platinum impregnated.
POLLUTANT
td
i
cyi
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T INLET OUTLET INLET OUTLET
deg F deg F deg F s deg F ppmv C ppmv C #C/h #C/h
DRE
CAPTURE
EFFIC
2 2.896 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in
#C/#. Outlet concentration is <3.5. Outlet emission rate is <0.0066. DRE is >98.5.
3 2.896 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in
#C/#. Outlet concentration is <3.3. Outlet emission rate is <0.0059. DRE is >98.4.
ethyl
acetate
1
87
275
n/r
n/r
n/r
0.00
0.00
n/r
0.000
n/r
n/r
ethyl
acetate
2
88
270
n/r
n/r
n/r
0.00
0.00
n/r
0.000
n/r
n/r
ethyl
acetate
3
82
272
n/r
n/r
n/r
0.00
0.00
n/r
0.000
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
1.615 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content in #C/#.
Inlet and outlet concentrations are <3.3 and <3.7, respectively. Inlet and outlet emission rates
are <0.006 and <0.0067, respectively.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#. Inlet and
outlet concentrations are <3.3 and <3.7 respectively. Inlet and outlet emission rates are <0.0065
and <0.0069, respectively.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#. Inlet and
outlet concentrations are <3.6 and <3.4,
and <0.0062, respectively.
respectively.
Inlet and outlet emission rates are <0.0071
methyl ethyl ketone 1
methyl ethyl ketone 2
methyl ethyl ketone 3
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
87
275
n/r
n/r
n/r
518.00
0.00
0.951
0.000
100.00
15.39
15
88
270
n/r
n/r
n/r
477 . 00
0.00
0 . 941
0.000
100.00
15.23
15
82
272
n/r
n/r
n/r
507.00
0.00
0.991
0.000
100.00
16.04
16
(continued)
-------
Page No. 15
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfnOll
Transco Products Corporation
609 West Elizabeth Avenue
Linden, NJ 07036
06/17/1991
NJDEP
C
402xxxxx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
curtain coating - nitrocellulose lacquer
metal parts coating
NJ Stack No. 001
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
600
n/r
n/r
natural gas
platinum impreg
n/r
NOTES No documentation of sample collection procedure used; method 5 procedures photocopied into report.
TOC ER 20.6 lb/hour, EF 1916 lb/ton; Butyl Acetate ER 0.06 lb/hour, EF 6 lb/ton; Toluene ER 0.11
lb/hour, EF 9.8 lb/ton; Methyl Ethyl Ketone ER 1.44 lb/hour, EF 134 lb/ton, Ethanol ER 0.62 lb/hour,
EF 58 lb/ton. No method 1 documentation of flow/stream analysis. Strip charts not labeled; no
system checks documented. No documentation of calibration gases.
Monitoring devices were installed: carbon monoxide, oxygen, CEMs, pre- and post-catalyst
temperature. Design gas flow rate was 1500 cfm/900 cfm::2 room/1 room operating. Design operating
temperature was taken at catalyst inlet. Sorbent/Catalyst was platinum impregnated.
POLLUTANT
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T INLET OUTLET
deg F deg F deg F s deg F ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
100.00
CAPTURE
EFFIC
15.55
6.17 #C/h usage rate. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content is in
#C/#. Outlet concentration is <4.6. Outlet emission rate is <0.0082. DRE is >99.
Concentration calculated from emission rate,
concentration is <4.5. Outlet emission rate
Concentration calculated from emission rate.
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#. Outlet
is <0.0084. DRE is >99.
Solvent pollutant content in #C/#. Outlet
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
15.6
concentration is <4.1. Outlet emission rate is <0.0075. DRE is >99.
toluene
toluene
toluene
AVERAGE
NOTES;
87
82
275
270
272
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
54 . 60
48.20
47.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.100
0.095
0.092
0.000 100.00 5.91
0.000 100.00 5.62
0.000 100.00 5.44
100.00 5.66
1.689 #C/h usage. Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content in #C/#.
Outlet concentration <6.2. Outlet emission rate <0.0112. DRE >88.8.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content in #C/#. Outlet
concentration is <6.1. Outlet emission rate is <0.0115. DRE is >87.9.
Concentration calculated from emission rate. Solvent pollutant content in #C/#. Outlet
concentration is <5.7. Outlet emission rate is <0.0103. DRE is >88.8.
5.9
5.6
5.4
5.7
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 16
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg9
Unifoil Corp
217 Brook Avenue
Passaic, NJ 07055
02/25/1992
NJDEP
A
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
3 laminators
Cat. Incin.
NJ3 .
catalytic incinerator
Eclipse Combustion
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
850
95.00
n/r
natural gas
n/r
n/r
NOTES
No solvent usage data.
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET OPER
deg F deg F deg F
362
346
337
632
618
609
n/r
n/r
n/r
RESIDENCE
TIME
s
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
275
285
150
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
9300.00
9500.00
9100.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
61.00
68.00
62 . 00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
228.577
226.418
235.523
1.601
1.823
1.674
AVERAGE
99.30
99.19
99.29
99.26
CAPTURE
EFFIC
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 17
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
cs006
Unifoil Corporation
217 Brook Avenue
Passaic, NJ 07055
11/10/1987
NJDEP
C
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
catalytic afterburner/laminator
3 laminators
lines 1,3,4
NJStack 001
NJ3 . 9
catalytic incinerator
eclipse combustion
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
3.270
850
n/r
n/r
natural gas
"Torvex"
n/r
NOTES
Solvent usage rates questionable. Design residence time is in seconds.
"Torvex" precious metal-ceramic honeycomb.
Sorbent/catalyst type is
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
494
451
455
578
554
566
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/r
n/r
n/r
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
11220.00
7920.00
95400.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
262.00
449.00
535.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
219.361
163.691
1971.732
5 .122
9 .113
10.659
AVERAGE
DRE
97 . 67
94.43
99.46
97.19
CAPTURE
EFFIC
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
acetone 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 191.40 15.36 3.742 0.300 91.98 n/r n/r
acetone 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 108.30 11.80 2.238 0.239 89.32 n/r n/r
acetone 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 135.90 12.60 2.809 0.251 91.06 n/r n/r
w AVERAGE 90.79 n/r n/r
OO
ethanol 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 762.00 17.50 14.898 0.342 97.70 n/r n/r
ethanol 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 400.00 16.80 8.267 0.341 95.88 n/r n/r
ethanol 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 596.00 23.60 12 .318 0.470 96.18 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 96.59 n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 4.24 9.30 0.083 0.182 -119.28 n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 0.00 3.50 n/r 0.071 n/r n/r n/r
ethyl acetate 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 0.00 3.90 n/r 0.078 n/r n/r n/r
AVERAGE n/r n/r n/r
NOTES: 2 Inlet concentration: ND-0.
3 Inlet concentration is ND = 0.
isopropanol 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 122.70 3.60 2.399 0.070 97.08 n/r n/r
isopropanol 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 65.70 9.12 1.358 0.185 86.38 n/r n/r
isopropanol 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 96.30 5.49 1. 990 0.109 94.52 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 92.66 n/r n/r
(continued)
-------
Page No. 18
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
cs006
Unifoil Corporation
217 Brook Avenue
Passaic, NJ 07055
11/10/1987
NJDEP
C
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
catalytic afterburner/laminator
3 laminators
lines 1,3,4
NJStack 001
NJ3 . 9
catalytic incinerator
eclipse combustion
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
3.270
850
n/r
n/r
natural gas
"Torvex"
n/r
NOTES
Solvent usage rates questionable. Design residence time is in seconds.
"Torvex" precious metal-ceramic honeycomb.
Sorbent/catalyst type is
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
ppmv C
---EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
td
isopropyl acetate 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 740.00 0.00 14.468 0.000 100.00 n/r n/r
isopropyl acetate 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 550.00 6.20 11.367 0.126 98.89 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 99.45 n/r n/r
NOTES: 1 Outlet concentration is ND = 0.
isopropyl acetate 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 725.00 7.40 14.984 0.147 99.02 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 99.02 n/r n/r
methyl ethyl ketone 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 3008.00 91.20 58.809 1.783 96.97 n/r n/r
methyl ethyl ketone 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 3364.00 177.00 69.527 3.592 94.83 n/r n/r
methyl ethyl ketone 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 3976.00 182.00 82.176 3.626 95.59 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 95.80 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 1 494 578 n/r n/r n/r 57.80 3.06 1.130 0.060 94.69 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 2 451 554 n/r n/r n/r 3.20 5.97 0.066 0.121 -83.33 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 3 455 566 n/r n/r n/r 50.30 5.40 1.040 0.108 89.62 n/r n/r
AVERAGE 33.66 n/r n/r
toluene
toluene
toluene
AVERAGE
494
451
455
578
554
566
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
9100.00
9100.00
11200.00
910.00
700.00
770.00
177.913
188.079
231.482
17.791
14.207
15.341
90.00
92.45
93 .37
91.94
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 19
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
CS004
Union Camp Corporation
One Colour Place
Englewood, NJ 07 631
05/24/1988
NJDEP
A
40201301
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
Rotogravure Press
Paper Coating
7-color sheet fed rotogravure
NJStack 005
EPA25A
catalytic incinerator
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/r
NOTES
Major solvent n-butyl acetate, but other compounds were not quantified.
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
90
95
96
442
442
427
690 n/r
650 n/r
635 n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/r
n/r
n/r
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
8760.00
9360.00
10440.00
ppmv C
15.00
25.20
31.80
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
114.666
126.180
142.683
0 .202
0.349
0.454
AVERAGE
99 . 82
99.72
99.68
99.74
CAPTURE
EFFIC
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
NOTES:
1 Calibrated with n-butyl acetate.
2 Calibrated with n-butyl acetate.
3 Calibrated with n-butyl acetate.
Incinerator went down halfway through test.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
t
to
O
-------
Page No. 2 0
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfnOlO
Evans Cooperage of Houston
10521 Sheldon Road
Houston, TX 77044
06/18/1988
TACB
C
40290013
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
barrel spray paint booth
EPA25A
incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%} n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
No calculations of finalized data. No certification of calibration gases. Inlet not tested.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
OUTLET
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
THC
THC
THC
AVERAGE
n/r
n/r
n/r
579
587
569
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.00 1180.00
0.00 527.00
0.00 445.00
n/r
n/r
n/r
3.805
1.918
1.642
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
td
to
-------
Page No. 21
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pglO
3M Company
225 Willowbrook Rd.
Freehold, NJ
08/08/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Coated Glass fiber type
Electrical Tape Man.
3 3 coater and 3 6 tower
NJ 3.7, 3.8
thermal incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Applied VOC reported as #VOC/h - no analysis of applied solvent.
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
CAPTURE
ttf
to
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
ethyl acetate
la
148
756
1500 n/r
n/a
797.00
0.00
19.700
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
lb
148
738
1500 n/r
n/a
874.00
0.00
20.280
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
1c
149
735
1500 n/r
n/a
863.00
0.00
19.635
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
2a
149
591
1400 n/r
n/a
872.00
0.00
18.802
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
2b
150
597
1400 n/r
n/a
835.00
0.00
19.248
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
2c
148
608
1400 n/r
n/a
787.00
0.00
19.185
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
3a
133
622
1500 n/r
n/a
838.00
0.00
18.439
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
3b
130
612
1500 n/r
n/a
914.00
0 . 00
18.058
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethyl acetate
3c
137
610
1500 n/r
n/a
917.00
0.00
19.304
0.000
100.00
n/r
AVERAGE
100.00
n/r
NOTES:
la
Outlet
concentration is <1.
lb
Outlet
concentration is <1.
lc
Outlet
concentration is <1.
2a
Outlet
concentration is <1.
2b
Outlet
concentration is <1.
2c
Outlet
concentration is <1.
3a
Outlet
concentration is <1.
3b
Outlet
concentration is <1.
3c
Outlet
concentration is <1.
toluene
la
148
756
1500 n/r
n/a
235.00
21.90
5.809
0.482
91.70
n/r
toluene
lb
148
738
1500 n/r
n/a
211.00
19.10
4 . 896
0.413
91.56
n/r
toluene
lc
149
735
1500 n/r
n/a
207.00
18.50
4.710
0.369
92 .17
n/r
toluene
2a
149
591
1400 n/r
n/a
218.00
19.80
4.700
0.440
90.64
n/r
toluene
2b
150
597
1400 n/r
n/a
224.00
20.30
5 .164
0.459
91.11
n/r
toluene
2c
148
608
1400 n/r
n/a
238.00
21.00
5.802
0 . 510
91.21
n/r
toluene
3a
133
622
1500 n/r
n/a
58.40
11.50
1.285
0.254 ¦
80.23
n/r
toluene
3b
130
612
1500 n/r
n/a
60.50
11.10
1.195
0.235
80.33
n/r
toluene
3c
137
610
1500 n/r
n/a
61.50
10.90
1.295
0.203
84 . 32
n/r
toluene
4a
132
545
1500 n/r
n/a
432.00
0.00
5 . 862
0.000
100.00
n/r
toluene
4b
116
523
1500 n/r
n/a
403.00
0.00
5.662
0.000
100.00
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
(continued)
-------
Page No. 22
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE pglO
FACILITY 3M Company
ADDRESS 225 Willowbrook Rd.
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
Freehold, NJ
08/08/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
Coated Glass fiber type
Electrical Tape Man.
33 coater and 36 tower
NJ 3.7,
thermal
n/r
3.8
incinerator
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Applied VOC reported as #VOC/h - no analysis of applied solvent.
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
toluene
4c
125
539
n/r
n/r
n/a
432.00
0.00
5.892
0.000
100.00
n/r
AVERAGE
91.11
n/r
NOTES:
4a
Outlet
concentration
is <1.
4b
Outlet
concentration
is <1.
4c
Outlet
concentration
is <1.
xylene
la
148
756
1500
n/r
n/a
9 .10
0.00
0.225
0 . 000
100.00
n/r
xylene
lb
148
738
1500
n/r
n/a
11.10
2 .80
0.258
0 . 061
76.36
n/r
xylene
lc
149
735
1500
n/r
n/a
10.00
0.00
0.228
0 . 000
100.00
n/r
xylene
2a
149
591
1400
n/r
n/a
11.80
0.00
0.254
0 . 000
100.00
n/r
xylene
2b
150
597
1400
n/r
n/a
10.40
0.00
0.240
0.000
100.00
n/r
xylene
2c
148
608
1400
n/r
n/a
9.20
0.00
0.224
0.000
100.00
n/r
xylene
3a
133
622
1500
n/r
n/a
14.40
0.00
0 .317
0.000
100.00
n/r
xylene
3b
130
612
1500
n/r
n/a
14 . 50
0.00
0.286
0 . 000
100.00
n/r
xylene
3c
137
610
1500
n/r
n/a
15.30
0.00
0 . 322
0 . 000
100.00
n/r
xylene
4a
132
545
1500
n/r
n/a
0.00
0.00
n/r
0.000
n/r
n/r
xylene
4b
116
523
1500
n/r
n/a
0.00
0.00
n/r
0 . 000
n/r
n/r
xylene
4c
125
539
n/r
n/r
n/a
0.00
0.00
n/r
0.000
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
n/r
n/r
NOTES:
la
Outlet
concentration
is <1.5.
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
lc Outlet concentration is <1.
2a Outlet concentration is <1.
2b Outlet concentration is <1.
2c Outlet concentration is <1.
3a Outlet concentration is <1.
3b Outlet concentration is <1.
3c Outlet concentration is <1.
4a Inlet and outlet concentrations are both
4b Inlet and outlet concentrations are both
<1.
<1.
(continued)
-------
Page No. 23
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pglO
3M Company
225 Willowbrook Rd.
Freehold, NJ
08/08/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
Coated Glass fiber type
Electrical Tape Man.
33 coater and 3 6 tower
NJ 3.7, 3.8
thermal incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Applied VOC reported as #VOC/h - no analysis of applied solvent.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
4c Inlet and outlet concentrations are both <1.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 24
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE pglO
FACILITY 3M Company
ADDRESS 225 Willowbrook Rd.
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
Freehold, NJ
08/08/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Coated Glass fiber type
Electrical Tape Man.
33 coater and 3 6 tower
NJ3 .7
thermal incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Applied VOC reported as #VOC/h - no analysis of applied solvent.
-TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
CAPTURE
CO
I
K>
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
THC
la
148
756
1500
n/r
n/a
7217.00
92 .10
178.389
2 .025
98.86
n/r
THC
lb
148
738
1500
n/r
n/a
7627.00
84 . 80
176.977
1. 835
98.96
n/r
THC
lc
149
735
1500
n/r
n/a
7963.00
83 .70
181.171
1. 668
99 . 08
n/r
THC
2a
149
591
1400
n/r
n/a
7797.00
194.00
168.117
4 . 313
97.43
n/r
THC
2b
150
597
1400
n/r
n/a
7621.00
210.00
175.675
4.747
97.30
n/r
THC
2c
148
608
1400
n/r
n/a
7421.00
202.00
1808.778
4 . 910
99.73
n/r
THC
3a
133
622
1500
n/r
n/a
6422.00
69 . 50
141.304
1.533
98.92
n/r
THC
3b
130
612
1500
n/r
n/a
6713.00
73 . 80
132.632
1. 562
98 . 82
n/r
THC
3c
137
610
1500
n/r
n/a
6988.00
66.60
147.109
1.239
99.16
n/r
THC
4a
132
545
1500
n/r
n/a
7199.00
44.20
97.678
0.670
99.31
n/r
THC
4b
116
523
1500
n/r
n/a
7395.00
41.30
103.890
0.687
99.34
n/r
THC
4c
125
539
1500
n/r
n/a
7524.00
40.90
102.620
0.660
99.36
n/r
AVERAGE
98.86
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 25
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pglO
3M Company
225 Willowbrook Rd.
Freehold, NJ
08/08/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Coated Glass fiber type
Electrical Tape Man.
33 coater and 36 tower
NJ3 . 8
thermal incinerator
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF {% )
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Applied VOC reported as #VOC/h - no analysis of applied solvent.
td
K)
ON
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
heptane
la
148
756
1500
n/r
n/a
97.80
1.00
2 .417
0 . 022
99.09
n/r
heptane
la
149
591
1500
n/r
n/a
107.00
1.00
2.307
0 . 022
99.05
n/r
heptane
lb
148
738
1500
n/r
n/a
101.00
1.00
2 . 344
0 . 022
99.06
n/r
heptane
lc
149
735
1500
n/r
n/a
107.00
1.00
2 .434
0 . 020
99 .18
n/r
heptane
2b
150
597
1400
n/r
n/a
103.00
1.20
2 . 374
0 . 027
98.86
n/r
heptane
2c
148
608
1400
n/r
n/a
98.80
1.00
2 .408
0 . 024
99 . 00
n/r
heptane
3a
133
622
1500
n/r
n/a
99 .00
1.00
2 .178
0 . 022
98.99
n/r
heptane
3b
130
612
1500
n/r
n/a
105.00
1.00
2 . 075
0 . 021
98.99
n/r
heptane
3c
137
610
1500
n/r
n/a
105.00
1.00
2 .210
0 . 019
99 .14
n/r
AVERAGE
99 . 04
n/r
NOTES:
la
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
la
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
lb
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
lc
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
2c
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
3a
Outlet
concentration
<1 ppm.
3b
Outlet
Concentration
<1 ppm.
3c
Outlet
Concentration
<1 ppm.
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 2 6
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
cs005
Advanced Printing Technology
P.O. Box 470
Morgantown, PA 19543-0470
06/29/1989
PaDER
A
40500511
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
rotogravure presses
rotogravure presses
thermal oxidizers
EPA2 5A
thermal incinerator
Smith Environmental
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1500
DESIGN EFFIC {%) 99.00
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
Thermal incinerator has a heat recovery system.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
---EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
CAPTURE
EFFIC
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
THC
1
152
325
n/r
n/r
n/a
7311.60
47.40
1340.989
7.228
99.46
n/r
n/r
THC
2
150
320
n/r
n/r
n/a
7202.40
66.90
1180.148
11.161
99.05
n/r
n/r
THC
3
152
307
n/r
n/r
n/a
7569.00
51.90
1262.767
7.895
99.37
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
99 . 29
n/r
n/r
NOTES:
Insufficient data to determine total enclosure. Inlet flow > outlet flow.
Insufficient data to determine total enclosure.
Insufficient data to determine total enclosure. Inlet flow > outlet flow.
n/a = data is not applicable.
i n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
N>
-J
-------
Page No. 27
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn013
Alford Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660
05/01/1991
NJDEP
B
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
rotogravure process
rotogravure printing
NJStack007
EPA25
thermal incinerator
J. T. Thorpe
n/r
19000.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
CAPTURE
EFFIC
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
AVERAGE
114
108
104
n/r
704
722
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
2152.00
2640.00
2309.00
65.00
235.00
186.00
28.478
35.540
32.103
n/r
3.086
2 . 502
n/r
91.32
92 .21
n/r
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
n/r
0.0
0.0
n/r
NOTES:
1 Average operating temperature is >1500.
2 Average Operating Temperature is >1500.
3 Average operating temperature is >1500.
Outlet flow rate and temperature are illegible.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 28
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE dfn02 0
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
Ames Rubber Company
Ames Boulevard
Hamburg, NJ 07419
Wantage, NJ
01/04/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Airless, electrostatic coating of metal parts
Metal Parts Coating
NJ stack046
NJ3.7
thermal incinerator
Smith Engineering
n/r
Heat recovery after incinerator. Inlet flow rate > outlet flow rate.
DESIGN RES TIME (s) 0.500
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1500
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL propane
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
44
59
74
524
532
530
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
3103.00
2390.00
2346.00
43 .00
32 .00
30.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
72.915
55.983
55.389
0.789
0.715
0.645
AVERAGE
98 . 92
98.72
98.83
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
84.20
64 . 65
63 . 96
70.94
83.3
63 . 8
63.2
70.1
NOTES:
1 Assumed "naptholite" contribution to voc's negligible
2 Assumed "naptholite" contributions to VOC's negligible.
3 Assumed "naptholite" contribution to voc to be negligible.
££ n/a = data is not applicable.
i n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
vo
-------
Page No. 29
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE dfn020
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
Ames Rubber Company
Ames Boulevard
Hamburg, NJ 07419
Wantage, NJ
01/04/1990
NJDEP
A
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
Airless, electrostatic coating of metal parts
Metal Parts Coating
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
NJ Stack046 DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
NJ3.9 DESIGN EFFIC (%)
thermal incinerator DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
Smith Engineering FUEL
n/r SORBENT/CATALYST
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
0.500
1500
n/r
n/r
propane
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Heat recovery after incinerator. Inlet flow rate > outlet flow rate.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
methyl ethyl ketone 1 44 524 n/r n/r
methyl ethyl ketone 2 59 532 n/r n/r
methyl ethyl ketone 3 74 530 n/r n/r
AVERAGE
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
363.20
283.20
214.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
2.00
1.75
2.45
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
8 . 535
6 . 634
5.053
0.037
0.039
0.053
DRE
99 . 57
99.41
98.95
99.31
CAPTURE
EFFIC
24.41
18.97
14.45
19 .28
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
24.3
18.9
14.3
19.2
td
i
u>
o
NOTES:
1 Outlet bag sample b.d.l., assumed 0
2 Outlet bag sample b.d.l., assumed 0.
3 Outlet bag sample b.d.l, assumed 0.
methyl isobutyl keto 1 44 524 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 2 59 532 n/r n/r
methyl isobutyl keto 3 74 530 n/r n/r
AVERAGE
n/a
n/a
n/a
NOTES:
1 Outlet bag sample b.d.l., assumed 0.
2 Outlet bag sample b.d.l., assumed 0.
3 Outlet bag sample b.d.l., assumed 0.
123.60
699.00
627.60
2.51
2 . 67
5.12
2 . 904
16.373
14.818
0 . 046
0.060
0 .110
98.42
99.63
99.26
99 .10
5 . 63
31.72
28.70
22 .02
5.5
31.6
28.5
21.9
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 30
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfnOOl
Congoleum Corporation
Sloan Avenue
Trenton, NJ 08619
07/14/1989
NJDEP
B
4029995
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Vinyl flooring mfr. - thermal oxidizer
Vinyl flooring mfr.
pilot line
thermal inc
NJAT Method 3
thermal incinerator
Maxon
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
6000.00
DEMONSTRATED EFF
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
(%)
0.500
1400
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a
n/a
NOTES
No certification of calibration gases. System operated outside of permit usage rate.
OVERALL
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
CONTROL
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
EFFECT
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
%
THC
1
236
1328
n/r
n/r
n/a
360.00
138.00
3 .156
1.277
59.54
n/r
n/r
THC
2
235
1356
n/r
n/r
n/a
528.00
204.00
4.315
2 .259
47.65
n/r
n/r
THC
3
240
1348
n/r
n/r
n/a
468.00
174.00
3.901
1. 873
51.99
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
53.06
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 31
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg7
Constant Services Inc.
17 Commerce Drive
Fairfield, NJ 07006
12/20/1988
NJDEP
C
40500511
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
3 Lembo v type rotogravure and one laminating
Rotogravure Printing
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
NJ3. DESIGN EFFIC (%)
thermal incinerator DEMONSTRATED EFF (%}
Huntington Energy FUEL
n/r SORBENT/CATALYST
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural
n/a
n/a
gas
NOTES Capture efficiency calculations are missing. Units on data sheets are missing. Summation of
individual chemicals on sheets in appendix B are greater than reported on the page marked "Ink
Solvent Content Breakdown". Xylol used in process but not tested. Quality rating B EPA18 data and C
for 25A.
OVERALL
W
i
w
to
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
CONTROL
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
EFFECT
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
%
acetone
1
79
248
n/r
n/r
n/a
6.78
2 .70
0.228
0.090
60.53
220.97
133 . 7
acetone
2
80
247
n/r
n/r
n/a
1.50
1.38
0.051
0.046
9.80
49 .42
4.9
acetone
3
78
244
n/r
n/r
n/a
0. 63
1.50
0 . 021
0.050
-138.10
20.93
-28.9
AVERAGE
-22.59
97 .11
36.6
eye1ohexanone
1
79
248
n/r
n/r
n/a
43.80
0.08
1.474
0.003
99 . 80
49.11
49 . 0
eye1ohexanone
2
80
247
n/r
n/r
n/a
46 . 25
2 .15
1.570
0.072
95 . 41
95 . 08
90.7
cyclohexanone
3
78
244
n/r
n/r
n/a
13.29
0.07
0.453
0.002
99 . 56
29 .45
29.3
AVERAGE
98.26
57 . 88
56.4
methyl ethyl ketone
1
79
248
n/r
n/r
n/a
296.80 .
0.04
9.989
0.001
99.99
66.56
66. 6
methyl ethyl ketone
2
80
247
n/r
n/r
n/a
246.70
6.88
8.373
0.231
97.24
59 . 01
57.4
methyl ethyl ketone
3
78
244
n/r
n/r
n/a
231.70
11.00
7.893
0.368
95.34
57.57
54 . 9
AVERAGE
97 . 52
61.05
59 . 6
methyl isobutyl
keto
1
79
248
n/r
n/r
n/a
197.10
12 .12
6 . 634
0.406
93 . 88
23 . 04
21
methyl isobutyl
keto
2
80
247
n/r
n/r
n/a
192.30
11.34
6.526
0.380
94.18
24.48
23
methyl isobutyl
keto
3
78
244
n/r
n/r
n/a
206.28
18.42
7 . 027
0 . 616
91.23
26 . 77
24
AVERAGE
93.10
24.76
23
toluene
1
79
248
n/r
n/r
n/a
17. 61
0.09
0.593
0.003
99 .49
20 . 39
20
toluene
2
80
247
n/r
n/r
n/a
24.43
3 .17
0.829
0.106
87.21
31.71
27
toluene
3
78
244
n/r
n/r
n/a
9 .25
4.68
0.315
0 .157
50 .16
12 . 52
6
AVERAGE 78.95 21.54 18.1
(continued)
-------
Page No. 32
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pg7
Constant Services Inc.
17 Commerce Drive
Fairfield, NJ 07006
12/20/1988
NJDEP
C
40500511
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
3 Lembo v type rotogravure and one laminating
Rotogravure Printing
NJ3 .
thermal incinerator
Huntington Energy
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL natural
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
gas
NOTES Capture efficiency calculations are missing. Units on data sheets are missing. Summation of
individual chemicals on sheets in appendix B are greater than reported on the page marked "Ink
Solvent Content Breakdown". Xylol used in process but not tested. Quality rating B EPA18 data and C
for 25A.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
% %
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
W
i
U>
oj
-------
Page No. 33
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
cs003
Crown Roll Leaf, Inc.
9 Illinois Avenue
Paterson, NJ 07501
01/20/1987
NJDEP
C
40201301
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
retrogravure printing-incinerator
retrogravure printing
o fume inc
NJ3
thermal incinerator
Machinery Services
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
W
i
LO
4^
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
cleg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
acetone
1
87
330
n/r
n/r
n/a
207.00
81.00
4.524
2 . 007
55. 64
n/r
acetone
2
87
329
n/r
n/r
n/a
930.00
483.00
20.336
11.369
44 . 09
n/r
acetone
3
89
343
n/r
n/r
n/a
516.00
252.00
11.813
6.055
48.74
n/r
AVERAGE
49 .49
n/r
ethanol
1
87
330
n/r
n/r
n/a
50.00
0.00
1.093
0.000
100.00
n/r
ethanol
2
87
329
n/r
n/r
n/a
558.00
46.00
12.202
1.083
91. 12
n/r
ethanol
3
89
343
n/r
n/r
n/a
280.00
54.00
6 . 410
1.297
79.77
n/r
AVERAGE
90.30
n/r
NOTES:
1
Outlet
concentration
is N/D (0).
methyl ethyl ketone
89
343
n/r
n/r
n/a
192.00
76.00
4.395
1. 826
58.45
n/r
methyl ethyl ketone
1
87
330
n/r
n/r
n/a
64.00
10.00
1.399
0.248
82.27
n/r
methyl ethyl ketone
2
87
329
n/r
n/r
n/a
216.00
56 . 00
4.723
1.318
72 . 09
n/r
AVERAGE
70.94
n/r
methyl isobutyl keto
1
87
330
n/r
n/r
n/a
498.00
234.00
10.883
5.797
46.73
n/r
methyl isobutyl keto
2
87
329
n/r
n/r
n/a
84.00
30.00
1. 837
0.706
61.57
n/r
methyl isobutyl keto
3
89
343
n/r
n/r
n/a
48.00
54.00
1. 099
1.297
-18.02
n/r
AVERAGE
30.09
n/r
toluene
1
87
330
n/r
n/r
n/a
3528.00
203.00
77.101
5.029
93 .48
n/r
toluene
2
87
329
n/r
n/r
n/a
4207.00
161.00
91.995
3.790
95.88
n/r
toluene
3
89
343
n/r
n/r
n/a
3283.00
203.00
75.158
4 . 877
93 .51
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
94.29
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 34
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn021
Dri-Print Foils, Inc.
329 New Brunswick Avenue
Rahway, NJ 07065
10/23/1991
NJDEP
C
40500512
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
polyester film coating
AFB 2 Incin
thermal incinerator
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
Many pages missing from this copy of the report.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
OUTLET
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
THC
THC
THC
AVERAGE
181
189
192
809
815
814
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
5450.00
5470.00
5460.00
54 .00
72.00
78.00
109.089
110.508
109.798
1.136
1.569
1. 656
98.96
98.58
98.49
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
Cd
I
oo
-------
Page No. 3 5
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn006
Dri-Print Foils, Inc.
329 New Brunswick Avenue
Rahway, NJ 07065
10/24/1991
NJDEP
C
40500512
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
rotogravure printing
Polyester sheet coating
AFB-1
EPA25
thermal incinerator
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC {%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
No documentation of system background test. 100% capture efficiency
the report is incomplete based on comparison w/TOC.
Procedure T. This copy of
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
162
172
172
752
750
748
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
4420.00
4050.00
5160.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
498.00
126.00
163.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
91.353
82.952
104.726
#C/h
10.200
2.534
3 .308
AVERAGE
DRE
88.83
96.95
96 . 84
94.21
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NOTES:
Pause in sample collection of 30 minutes.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
CO
oo
ON
-------
Page No. 3 6
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pgll
GM Corp., Fisher Div.
1445 Parkway Ave.
Trenton, NJ 08650
06/29/1988
NJDEP
A
40200803
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Auto Body Coating-Primer Curing Oven
Auto Body Coating
DESIGN RES TIME (s) 0.500
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1400
NJ3. DESIGN EFFIC (%) 99.00
thermal incinerator DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
Eisenmann FUEL n/r
n/r SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
1480.00 SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
Design RT 0.5-1.0 s.
OVERALL
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
CONTROL
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
EFFECT
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
%
THC
1
341
1110
n/r
n/r
n/a
312.00
96.00
1.266
0 . 382
69.83
n/r
n/r
THC
2
341
1117
n/r
n/r
n/a
247.00
48.00
1. 008
0.195
80.65
n/r
n/r
THC
3
355
1138
n/r
n/r
n/a
244.00
78.00
0 .980
0.328
66.53
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
72 .34
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 37
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
csOOl
Gomar Manufacturing
1501 West Blancke Street
Linden, NJ 0703 6
12/17/1991
NJDEPE
A
402900xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Polyester Film Coating
Boart
EPA2 5
thermal incinerator
Boart Metal Products
01/01/1984
5000.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
0.500
1500
99.00
99.00
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
Low audit +62.6%, High Audit-48.4%, data quality rating "A" by OAQPS contractor should be reduced.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
201 1130
204 1160
205 1218
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
11253.00
17575.00
17350.00
59.00
150.00
63 . 00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
69.794
110.936
110.162
0.367
0.909
0.370
AVERAGE
DRE
99.47
99.18
99.66
99 .44
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
99.7
99.2
99 . 7
99 . 5
Ctf
00
NOTES: 2 Usage rate based on measured production rate and solids/unit production. Solvent pollutant content
is in #C/#VOC.
3 Usage rate based on measured production rate and solids/unit production. Solvent pollutant content
in #C/#VOC.
4 Usage rate based on measured production rate and solids/unit production. Solvent pollutant content
in #C/VOC.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 38
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
pg8
PROCESS TYPE
Laminating Printer, Ross
Waldron Thermal Oxidation
Unit
FACILITY
J. Josephson Inc.
PROCESS
Laminating Printer
ADDRESS
20 Horizon Blvd
LINE DESIGNATION
Press #2 and #3
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
n/r
CONTROL DEVICE
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
n/r
S. Hackensack, NJ 07606
TEST METHOD
NJ3 .
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
n/r
TEST DATE
12/16/1988
CONTROL TYPE
thermal incinerator
DEMONSTRATED EFF
(%)
n/r
AGENCY
NJDEP
CONTROL MANUF
Ross Waldon
FUEL
n/r
RATING
A
DATE INSTALLED
n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST
n/a
see
402900xx
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
n/r
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/a
NOTES Ink formulations are not included.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
DRE
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
THC
THC
THC
80
85
82
253
249
243
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
2485.20
2493.00
2506.20
100.80
103.80
93 .00
87.021
89.118
89.200
3 .700
3 .797
3 .473
AVERAGE
95.75
95.74
96. 11
95.87
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
NOTES:
Ink Formulations were not included.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
td
I
U)
VO
-------
Page No. 39
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
pgl
Keuffel & Esser Redon Facility
Ford Road
Rockaway, NJ 07866
04/19/1988
NJ
A
402013xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
paper coating-thermal incinerator
paper coating
A-2, T
thermal inc
EPA2 5
thermal incinerator
Smith Engineering
n/r
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NOTES
NIOSH methods: Toluene-1501, Ethyl Acetate-2(549), Acetic Acid 1603, Ethyl Alcohol-2(556) .
below DL. 1st tests stopped because production line stopped.
All
Plant state is New Jersey DEP DEQ.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
TGNMO
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
130
131
129
731
736
736
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
5019.98
7516.04
6823.97
79.20
109.50
127.80
---EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
50.792
79.345
64.470
0.905
1.161
1.246
AVERAGE
98.22
98.54
98 . 07
98.28
CAPTURE
EFFIC
40.01
68.57
55.36
54.65
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
39.3
67.6
54.3
53 .7
to
I
o
NOTES:
Lines A-2 and T connect and go to incinerator,
weighed by SCFM flow and
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#.
Solvent pollutant content is in #C/#.
T is enclosed but A is not. Temperatures are
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 40
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
dfn003
L.P. Thebault Company
Parsippany, NJ
06/08/1990
NJDEP
B
40500411
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
Web offset lithography-heat set
Web offset lithography
Web 15 + Web 16
NJAT Method 3-7
thermal incinerator
TEC Systems
n/r
No documentation of testing, hand-written calculations only. Capture efficiency 73%.
printing. Report prepared for TEC Systems; results may be "demonstrated efficiency",
emission rates are reported based upon calculations.
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF {%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
Paper
Isopropanol
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
250
271
268
456
458
456
1412 n/r
1414 n/r
1413 n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
572.00
626.00
664.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
6.80
5.20
6.00
---EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
2 .432
2.658
2.720
0.036
0.025
0.030
AVERAGE
98 . 52
99 . 06
98.90
98.83
CAPTURE
EFFIC
%
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
W
I
-------
Page No. 41
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn019
Lamart Corp.
16 Richmond St.
37 Chestnut St.
Clifton, NJ 07015
11/30/1990
NJDEP
C
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
adhesive film coating
3 laminating/coating lines
NJstackOlO
NJAT 3.7
thermal incinerator
Huntingdon En. Syst.
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF
FUEL
SORBENT / CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
S)
0
1500
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a
n/a
500
NOTES No strip charts-manual readings only. No calibration gas certification. Minimal documentation of
sample analyses. 100% capture efficiency. Ethyl Acetate, Isopropyl Alcohol, none detected. Methyl
Ethyl Ketone destruction efficiency 96.8%. Toluene destruction efficiency 95.0%.
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEMPERATURE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER
deg F deg F
131
124
126
296
283
294
RESIDENCE
TIME
deg F s
1510 n/r
1508 n/r
1510 n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET
ppmv C
3813.00
3664.00
3722.00
OUTLET
ppmv C
112.00
109.00
79 . 00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
112.446
112.439
108.591
4.030
4 .117
2 . 640
AVERAGE
DRE
96.42
96.34
97 . 57
96.78
CAPTURE
EFFIC
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 42
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
dfn019
Lamart Corp.
16 Richmond St.
37 Chestnut St.
Clifton, NJ 07015
11/30/1990
NJDEP
C
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
adhesive film coating
3 laminating/coating lines
NJstackOlO
NJAT 3.9
thermal incinerator
Huntingdon En. Syst.
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) 0.
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1500
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
No strip charts-manual readings only. No calibration gas certification. Minimal documentation of
sample analyses. 100% capture efficiency. Ethyl Acetate, Isopropyl Alcohol, none detected. Methyl
Ethyl Ketone destruction efficiency 96.8%. Toluene destruction efficiency 95.0%.
500
POLLUTANT
ethyl acetate
ethyl acetate
ethyl acetate
AVERAGE
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
1 126 296 1510 n/r
2 124 283 1508 n/r
3 126 294 1510 n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
140.80
130.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
---EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
4 .152
4 . 002
n/r
0.000
0.000
0.000
100.00
100.00
n/r
n/r
CAPTURE
EFFIC
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
td
u>
NOTES:
isopropanol
isopropanol
isopropanol
AVERAGE
Outlet VOC concentration is <4.0. Outlet emission rate is <0.14. DRE is >96.6.
Outlet VOC concentration is <4.0. Outlet emission rate is <0.15. DRE is >96.2.
Inlet and outlet VOC concentrations are <4.0. Inlet and outlet emission rates are <0.11 and <0.14,
respectively.
126 296 1510 n/r
124 283 1508 n/r
126 294 1510 n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.00
0.00
33.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
n/r
n/r
0 . 972
0.000 n/r 100.00
0.000 n/r 100.00
0.000 100.00 100.00
n/r 100.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
NOTES:
1 Inlet and outlet VOC concentrations are <6.0. Inlet and outlet emission rates are <0.18 and 0.22,
respectively.
2 Inlet and outlet VOC concentrations are <6.0. Inlet and outlet emission rates are <0.19 and 0.23,
respectively.
Outlet VOC concentration is <6.0. Outlet emission rate is <0.20. DRE is >79.4.
methyl ethyl ketone 1
methyl ethyl ketone 2
methyl ethyl ketone 3
AVERAGE
126 296 1510 n/r
124 283 1508 n/r
126 294 1510 n/r
n/a 2968.00 107.60 87.527
n/a 2928.00 103.60 89.853
n/a 3524.00 38.00 102.814
3 . 872
3.913
1.270
95.58
95.65
98.76
96.66
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(continued)
-------
Page No. 43
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
dfn019
Lamart Corp.
16 Richmond St.
37 Chestnut St.
Clifton, NJ 07015
11/30/1990
NJDEP
C
40200701
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
adhesive film coating
3 laminating/coating lines
NJstackOlO
NJAT 3.9
thermal incinerator
Huntingdon En. Syst.
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) 0.500
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1500
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL n/r
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE
-------
Page No. 44
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn004
Mannington Mills, Inc.
P.O. Box 3 0
Salem, NJ 08079
06/04/1987
NJDEP
B
308007xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
laminating printers
NJ Stack No. 043 Print II
Print II
NJAT Method 3
thermal incinerator
Huntingdon Ener. Sys
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL natural
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
gas
NOTES
No certification of calibration gases, appears only one was used.
OVERALL
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
CONTROL
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
EFFECT
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
%
THC
1
140
320
1580
n/r
n/a
1143.00
48.30
49.035
2 .446
95.01
n/r
n/r
THC
2
140
338
1560
n/r
n/a
1341.00
52 . 30
55.691
2 . 535
95.45
n/r
n/r
THC
3
140
326
1560
n/r
n/a
1372.00
46.50
58.151
2 .389
95.89
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
95.45
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 45
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn005
Mannington Mills, Inc.
P.O. Box 30
Salem, NJ 08079
06/05/1987
NJDEP
B
308007xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
laminating printers
NJ Stack No. 42. Print III
Print III
NJAT Method 3
thermal incinerator
Ross Waldron
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
No certification of calibration gases, appears only one was used.
POLLUTANT
THC
THC
THC
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F s
deg F deg F
131
117
125
301
266
281
1525
1550
1550
n/r
n/r
n/r
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
824.00
592.00
687.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
16.40
11.60
15.80
#C/h
41.080
31.562
36.929
#C/h
1. 013
0.712
0 . 955
AVERAGE
DRE
97 . 53
97.74
97.41
97.56
CAPTURE
EFFIC
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 46
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn014
Milton Can Company
Elizabeth, NJ
05/24/1991
NJDEP
B
402017xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
processes metal can coatings
sheet metal coating
NJStack005
NJAT Method 3
thermal incinerator
CorPak
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
(%)
n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) 1400
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES Methyl ethyl ketone 8.01: lb/hr, 136 lb/ton, "A", 99.87 destruction efficiency; N-butanol: 0.95
lb/hr, 16.2 lb/ton, "A", 98.91 destruction efficiency; Ethyl Benzene: 3.11 lb/hr, 52.9 lb/ton, "A",
99.52 destruction efficiency; Xylene: 11.76 lb/hr, 200 lb/ton, "A", 99.87 destruction efficiency;
EEP: 12.90 lb/hr, 219 lb/ton, "A", 99.84 destruction efficiency.
-TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION EMISSIONS-
CAPTURE
td
¦
4^
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
s
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
2-ethoxyethyl acetat
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
266.40
1.80
3 . 820
0.010
99 . 74
n/r
2-ethoxyethyl acetat
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
316.20
1.80
4.269
0.012
99 . 72
n/r
2-ethoxyethyl acetat
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
406.80
1.80
6.298
0 . 010
99 . 84
n/r
2-ethoxyethyl acetat
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
238.80
1.80
3.026
0 . 011
99 . 64
n/r
2-ethoxyethyl acetat
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
310.80
1.80
4 . 651
0 . 010
99 . 78
n/r
AVERAGE
99.74
n/r
2 -ethy1-3-ethoxy
pro
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
424.90
2.10
6 . 093
0 . 011
99.82
n/r
2-ethyl-3-ethoxy
pro
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
337.40
2 .10
4 . 555
0 . 014
99.69
n/r
2-ethyl-3-ethoxy
pro
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
669 .20
2 .10
10.361
0 . 012
99.88
n/r
2-ethyl-3-ethoxy
pro
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
351.40
2 .10
4.453
0.012
99.73
n/r
2-ethyl-3-ethoxy
pro
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
382.90
2 .10
5.730
0.012
99 .79
n/r
AVERAGE
99 .78
n/r
THC
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
1631.00
1.00
23 .390
0.005
99.98
n/r
THC
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
1294.00
1.00
17.471
0.007
99.96
n/r
THC
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
2452.00
2.00
37.963
0.011
99.97
n/r
THC
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
1229.00
1.00
15.575
0.006
99.96
n/r
THC
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
2148.00
7.00
32.144
0.040
99.88
n/r
AVERAGE
99 .95
n/r
ethyl benzene
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
136.00
2 .40
1. 950
0.013
99.33
n/r
ethyl benzene
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
126.40
2 .40
1. 707
0.016
99 .06
n/r
ethyl benzene
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
208.80
2.40
3 .233
0.013
99 . 60
n/r
ethyl benzene
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
119 .20
2 .40
1.511
0.014
99 .07
n/r
ethyl benzene
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
218.40
2.40
3 .268
0.014
99 .57
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
(continued)
-------
Page No. 47
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn014
Milton Can Company
Elizabeth, NJ
05/24/1991
NJDEP
402017xx
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm) n/r
processes metal can coatings
sheet metal coating
NJStack005
NJAT Method 3
thermal incinerator
CorPak
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
1400
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES Methyl ethyl ketone 8.01: Ib/hr, 136 lb/ton, "A", 99.87 destruction efficiency; N-butanol: 0.95
lb/hr, 16.2 lb/ton, "A", 98.91 destruction efficiency; Ethyl Benzene: 3.11 lb/hr, 52.9 lb/ton, "A"
99.52 destruction efficiency; Xylene: 11.76 lb/hr, 200 lb/ton, "A", 99.87 destruction efficiency;
EEP: 12.90 lb/hr, 219 lb/ton, "A", 99.84 destruction efficiency.
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T
deg F deg F deg F s deg F
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C
ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h
#C/h
CAPTURE
DRE EFFIC
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
AVERAGE
99 .33
n/r
n/r
W
i
00
methyl ethyl
ketone
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
224.00
1.20
3 .212
0 . 007
99.78
n/r
methyl ethyl
ketone
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
200.00
1.20
2 . 700
0. 008
99.70
n/r
methyl ethyl
ketone
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
327.20
1.20
5.066
0 . 007
99 . 86
n/r
methyl ethyl
ketone
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
170.40
1.20
2 . 159
0 . 007
99 . 68
n/r
methyl ethyl
ketone
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
516.40
1.20
7 . 728
0 . 007
99.91
n/r
AVERAGE
99.79
n/r
n-butanol
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
28.00
1.20
0.402
0.007
98.26
n/r
n-butanol
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
25.20
1.20
0.340
0.008
97 . 65
n/r
n-butanol
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
46.00
1.20
0.712
0 . 007
99.02
n/r
n-butanol
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
23.20
1.20
0.294
0 . 007
97.62
n/r
n-butanol
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
49 . 60
1.20
0 . 742
0.007
99.06
n/r
AVERAGE
98.32
n/r
xylenes
1H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
540.00
2 .40
7 . 744
0.013
99 . 83
n/r
xylenes
1L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
606.40
2.40
8 . 187
0 . 016
99.80
n/r
xylenes
2H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
846.40
2.40
13.104
0.013
99 . 90
n/r
xylenes
2L
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
479 .20
2 .40
6.073
0.014
99.77
n/r
xylenes
3H
n/r
n/r
1425
n/r
n/a
729.60
2.40
10.918
0. 014
99 . 87
n/r
AVERAGE
99.83
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
Page No. 48
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
NOTES
dfn007
Newco, Inc.
Hicks Avenue
Newton, NJ 07880
08/18/1989
NJDEP
B
40500511
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Rotogravure Printing
Rotogravure Printing
thermal in.
NJAT Method 3.7
thermal incinerator
Huntingdon En. Sys.
n/r
n/r
DESIGN RES TIME (s) n/r
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF) n/r
DESIGN EFFIC (%) n/r
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%) n/r
FUEL natural
SORBENT/CATALYST n/a
SORB/CAT AGE (yr) n/a
NJ Method 3.9: impingers and tedlar bag. Capture efficiency 84.6% according to test, 58.2%
according to NJDEP; NJDEP ink usage rates used to calculate EF. Acetone, methyl ethyl ketone,
methyl isobutyl ketone not detected at outlet.
gas
POLLUTANT
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE CATALYST VOC CONCENTRATION
TEST INLET OUTLET OPER TIME DELTA T INLET OUTLET
deg F deg F deg F s deg F ppmv C ppmv C
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
DRE
CAPTURE
EFFIC
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
THC
THC
THC
ta
vo
AVERAGE
NOTES:
81
83
85
219
220
221
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/r n/r
n/a
n/a
n/a
2241.00
2640.00
2328.00
290.00
114.00
105.00
47.060
55.709
49.173
6.899
2.749
2.504
85.34
95.07
94.91
91.77
Capture efficiency based upon sum of acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, and methyl isobutyl ketone
results versus sorbent usage. Capture could be improved by inclusion of the tolene data. Sum
(actone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone) inlet emission rate larger than THC inlet
emission rate.
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
-------
Page No. 49
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn002
Prior Coated Metals, Inc.
2233 26th Street S.W.
Allentown, PA 18103
09/20/1989
PA DER
A
40201801
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
Metal (Coil) Coating-Thermal Incinerator
Metal (Coil) Coating
Metal Coil Coater
Thermal inc
EPA2 5
thermal incinerator
Hirt Combustion Eng.
01/01/1982
4840.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
0.800
1500
99 . 00
99 . 00
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES Capture efficiency 73.6%. 2 run is in 1st part only. NO raw data, all typed PaDir. No
documentation of performance test duration. No documentation of system background test. Inlet
tests were performed after the drying ovens; do not account for any destruction/control due to the
ovens.
POLLUTANT
TGNMO
TGNMO
AVERAGE
NOTES:
TEST
TEMPERATURE RESIDENCE
INLET OUTLET OPER TIME
deg F deg F deg F s
556
556
1303
1303
1420
1416
0 . 631
0. 632
CATALYST
DELTA T
deg F
n/a
n/a
VOC CONCENTRATION
INLET OUTLET
ppmv C ppmv C
13382.00
20214.00
Units for solvent pollutant content are #C/#.
Units for solvent pollutant content are #C/#.
1501.00
190.00
EMISSIONS
INLET OUTLET
#C/h #C/h
161.961
244.648
17.887
2 .264
OVERALL
CAPTURE CONTROL
EFFIC EFFECT
88.96 194.32 172.9
99.07 267.87 265.4
94.02 231.10 219.1
n/a = data is not applicable,
i n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
O
-------
Page No. 50
07/14/1993
PLANT CODE
FACILITY
ADDRESS
TEST DATE
AGENCY
RATING
SCC
dfn018
Rebtex, Inc.
Somerville, NJ
06/18/1991
NJDEP
C
40201101
PROCESS TYPE
PROCESS
LINE DESIGNATION
CONTROL DEVICE
TEST METHOD
CONTROL TYPE
CONTROL MANUF
DATE INSTALLED
DESIGN FLOW (dscfm)
heat setting ovens vented to fume incinerators
textile coating
Number 3 dryer exhaust
NJ StackOlO
NJAT Method 3-7
thermal incinerator
Process Combustion
n/r
10000.00
DESIGN RES TIME (s)
DESIGN OP TEMP (degF)
DESIGN EFFIC (%)
DEMONSTRATED EFF (%)
FUEL
SORBENT/CATALYST
SORB/CAT AGE (yr)
n/r
1500
n/r
n/r
natural gas
n/a
n/a
NOTES
No certification of calibration gases. Analyzer calibrated with propane, but results reported as
methane. Incomplete copy of report, inlet not tested.
TEMPERATURE
RESIDENCE
CATALYST
VOC CONCENTRATION --
EMISSIONS
CAPTURE
POLLUTANT
TEST
INLET
OUTLET
OPER
TIME
DELTA T
INLET
OUTLET
INLET
OUTLET
DRE
EFFIC
deg F
deg F
deg F
S
deg F
ppmv C
ppmv C
#C/h
#C/h
%
%
THC
1
n/r
868
1510
n/r
n/a
0.00
9.60
n/r
0.115
n/r
n/r
THC
2
n/r
864
1506
n/r
n/a
0.00
1.90
n/r
0.025
n/r
n/r
THC
3
n/r
866
1511
n/r
n/a
0.00
0.70
n/r
0.009
n/r
n/r
AVERAGE
n/r
n/r
OVERALL
CONTROL
EFFECT
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
NOTES:
1 Inlet not tested.
2 Inlet not tested.
3 Inlet not tested.
Gd
I
L/i
n/a = data is not applicable.
n/r = data is not reported or data required for calculation is not reported.
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
REPORT REVIEWS
C-l
-------
Corieoleum Corporation, Trenton, NJ, 7/14-17/89 - Produces vinyl flooring. Exhaust from the
pilot line is controlled by a Maxon afterburner. EPA Methods 2, 3,4, and 10 were performed along with
NJAT Method 3. NJDEP noted that the production rate was above the permit usage rate which may
explain the low destruction efficiency. Assigned a rating of "B" in the OAQPS dBASE file. (dfnOOl)
Prior Coated Metals. Incorporated. Allentown, PA. 9/20/89 - Paints metal coils. After painting,
the coils are dried in a direct-fired oven. The oven exhaust is ducted to a Hurt Combustion Engineering
thermal incinerator. EPA Method 25 was used to determine THC from the inlet and outlet of the
incinerator. Destruction efficiency and capture efficiency values may be lower than reality because the
inlet tests do not account for destruction occurring in the ovens. The report was not rated in OAQPS
dBASE file. Assigned an "A". (dfn002)
L.P. Thebault Company. Parsiopanv. NJ. 6/8/90 - This report should probably be eliminated
from this file because it appears to be in the category of paper printing ("solvent retention in the printed
paper product"). Performs heatset web offset lithography. The control device is a TEC Systems thermal
incinerator. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, and NJAT Method 3-7 were performed. Isopropanol results are also
reported but are based on calculations rather than sampling and analysis. The report was not rated in
OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a "B" because of the lack of detail in the report. These results may
represent "demonstrated efficiency" since the report was prepared for TEC Systems. (dfn003)
Mannineton Mills. Incorporated. Salem. NJ. 6/4/87 - Prints and laminates paper. Uses both tray
and roller type laminating printers. Fume hoods from several machines are manifolded at the inlet of a
Huntington Energy Systems thermal incinerator. The Huntington Energy Systems thermal oxidizer is a
regenerative heat recovery system utilizing at least three ceramic beds. The first unit preheats the inlet
stream. Combustion occurs in the second unit. The third unit extracts heat from the exhaust stream. As
the first bed cools, the functions of the identical units are switched so that recovered heat is available for
the preheating function. This installation utilizes five ceramic beds. These results may be "demonstrated
C-2
-------
efficiency" since the introduction describes it as a new installation. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, and NJAT
Method 3-7 were performed. Assigned a rating of "B" in the OAQPS dBASE file. (dfn004, dfn005)
Dri-Print Foils Incorporated, Rahway. NJ, 10/24/91 - Produces polyester film coating. A thermal
incinerator is used. This report covers the testing of AFB-1 incinerator. This report does not appear to
have been in the OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a "C" because of the lack of detail in the report probably
due to missing pages in this copy of the report. (dfn006)
Newco, Incorporated. Newton, NJ, 8/1.8/89 - This plant performs rotogravure printing. Negative
draft capture hooding on three rotogravure presses and one laminating printer and manifolded at the inlet
of a Huntington Energy Systems thermal incinerator. The Huntington Energy Systems thermal oxidizer
is a regenerative heat recovery system utilizing at least three ceramic beds. The first unit preheats the
inlet stream. Combustion occurs in the second unit. The third unit extracts heat from the exhaust stream.
As the first bed cools, the functions of the identical units are switched so that recovered heat is available
for the preheating function. EPA Methods 1,2, 3, and 4 were performed along with NJAT Methods 3-7
and 3-9. Specific testing was performed for acetone, methylethyl ketone, and methylisobutyl ketone.
Capture efficiency was calculated from the sum of the specific analytes versus the gross solvent usage.
Examination of the raw data indicates that toluene was present but not reported. Inclusion of toluene
data would have improved this capture efficiency. Assigned a rating of "B" in the OAQPS dBASE file.
(dfn007)
Rovsons. Incorporated, Rockawav. NJ. 12/11/90 - Produces vinyl wall covering. Negative draft
capture hooding on three U-type Lembo presses and one stack type color printer and manifolded at the
inlet of an EDA catalytic incinerator. EPA Methods I, 2, 3, and 10 were performed along with NJAT
Methods 3-7 and 3-9, Specific testing was performed for acetone, methylethyl ketone, methylisobutyl
ketone, and toluene. Capture efficiency was calculated from the sum of the specific analytes versus the
gross solvent usage. Assigned a rating of "C" in the OAQPS dBASE file. (dfn008)
-------
Pittsburgh Metal Lithographing Company, Incorporated, Sewieklev. PA, 8/24/88 - Testing was
performed on a metal coating line controlled by a catalytic incinerator, EPA Method 25 was used to
determine TGNMOC from the inlet and outlet of the incinerator. The report was not rated in OAQPS
dBASE file. Assigned a "C" because of lack of detail in the report, and questionable results for one ran
which was not repeated. Capture efficiency greater than 100 percent was reported for two of the three
runs, (dfn009)
Evans Cooperage of Houston. Incorporated. Houston, TX. 6/18/88 - Paint barrels. The spray
booth is vented to a thermal incinerator. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 25A were performed. The inlet
was not tested. Assigned a rating of "C" in the OAQPS dBASE file. (dfnOlO)
Transco Products Corporation, Linden, NJ. 6/17/91 - Coats metal discs for the recording industry
with a protective nitrocellulose lacquer. Seventy drying boxes plus the curtain coating area are
manifolded and vented to a platinum impregnated catalytic oxidizer. The catalyst inlet is temperature
controlled. CEMs monitor inlet and outlet temperature, and outlet oxygen and carbon monoxide.
Methods are not specified. Testing was performed for THC, ethanol, methylethyl ketone, ethyl acetate,
butyl acetate, and toluene. The report was not rated in OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a "C" because of
lack of detail in the report. (dfnOl 1)
Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Summit. NJ. 5/7/91 - Produces adhesive patch pharmaceutical
products. Chloroform emissions from the laminating coater are controlled by a VIC Manufacturing
Corporation dual-bed carbon adsorber. An unspecified CEM monitors the exhaust for breakthrough.
NJAT method 3.9 was used to analyze inlet and outlet for chloroform. Assigned a rating of "A" in the
OAQPS dBASE file. (dfn012)
Alford Industries. Incorporated. Ridgefield Park, NJ. 5/1/91 - Rotogravure printing on a
paperboard web is performed here. The product is transferred to a hot air dryer after coating. The
exhaust of the dryer is vented to a J.T. Thorpe thermal oxidizer which was fired by natural gas and
C-4
-------
operated above 1,500 °F throughout these tests. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3,4, and 25 were performed. EPA
Procedure T was shown to apply. Therefore, 100 percent capture is assumed in the calculations. The
report was not rated in OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a rating of "B", (dfn013)
Milton Can Company, Elizabeth. NJ, 5/24/91 - Produces metal containers. Prior to forming
operations, sheet metal is coated with a solvent borne polymeric material to protect against corrosion.
The drying oven exhaust is ducted to a Cor Pak direct flame incinerator. A fume hood over the roller
applicator is ducted directly to atmosphere. The system was tested under two production levels. EPA
Methods 1, 2, 3, 3A, 4, and 10 were performed along with NIAT Methods 3-7 and 3-9. Specific analyses
were petformed for methylethyl ketone, n-butanol, ethyl benzene, xylenes, 2-ethoxyethyl acetate, and 2-
ethyI-3-ethoxy propionate. The incinerator was operated at a constant 1,425 °F. Assigned a rating of
"B" in the OAQPS dBASE file. (dfn014)
Crown Roll Leaf. Paterson, NJ. 8/9/88 - Performs rotogravure printing. Uses a catalytic
afterburner. Methods used are not stated. Results are presented for THC as well as ethanol, acetone,
methylethyl ketone, ethyl acetate, methylisobutyl ketone, and toluene. The report was not rated in the
OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a rating of "C" because of lack of detail in the report. Many pages are
missing from this copy of this report. (dfn017)
Rebtex. Incorporated. SomerviHe. NJ. 6/18/91 - Perforins textile coating. Heat setting ovens are
vented to a Process Combustion Company thermal incinerator. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were
performed along with N.TAT Method 3-7. The inlet was not tested. Assigned a rating of "C" in the
OAQPS dBASE file. (dfn018)
Lamart Corporation, Clifton, NJ, 11/30/90 - Adhesive backed films are produced on three
coating lines. EPA Procedure T was shown to apply. Therefore, 100 percent capture is assumed in the
calculations. The three enclosures are manifolded and ducted to the inlet of a Huntington Energy
Systems thermal oxidizer. The Huntington Energy Systems thermal oxidizer is a regenerative heat
C-5
-------
recovery system utilizing at least three ceramic beds. The first unit preheats the inlet stream.
Combustion occurs in the second unit. The third unit extracts heat from the exhaust stream. As the first
bed cools, the functions of the identical units are switched so that recovered heat is available for the
preheating function. EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 3A, and 10 were performed along with NJAT Methods 3-7
and 3-9. Specific analyses were performed for isopropanol, methylethyl ketone, ethyl acetate, and
toluene. The report was not rated in OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a rating of "C" because of lack of
detail in the report, (dfn019)
Dri-Print Foils Incorporated. Rahway, N.I. 10/23/91 - Produces polyester film coating. A thermal
incinerator is used, This report covers the testing of AFB-2 incinerator. This report does not appear to
have been in the OAQPS dBASE file. Assigned a "C" because of the lack of detail in the report probably
due to the missing pages in this copy of the report. (dfn021)
Keuffel & Esser Redon Facility, Rockaway, NJ, 04/19/88 - This facility prepares specialty
coated paper. All data are accurate and complete. Method 18 was used to test the outlet for acetic acid,
toluene, ethyl acetate, and ethanol; however, the inlet was not tested so the destruction efficiency for
these substances could not be determined. Fuel and manufacturer are the only information on the
thermal incinerator. The VOC sources are Lines A-2 and T whose outlets connect before going to the
incinerator. The inlet temperature is an average of the outlet of A-2 and T weighted by flow rate. Run 1
was not included because production lines stopped during testing. This was already assigned an "A"
rating, (pdgl)
Apollo Metals Incorporated. Bethlehem. PA. 01/07/88 - The sources of the VOCs are two coiled
sheet metal coating lines, Tower 2 and Tower 4. There was no information on the catalytic incinerator.
The temperature change across the catalyst was not included. It is unclear where the percent carbon
figure was calculated and where the reported number was derived from the Method 24 analysis. This test
was already assigned a "B" rating. (pdg2)
C-6
-------
Apollo Metals Incorporated. Bethlehem, PA, 07/06/88 - The sources of the VOCs are two coiled
sheet metal coating lines, Tower 2 and Tower 4, The solvent usage rate reported was an average for the
entire day, so individual tests may contain error due to this approximation. There was no information on
the catalytic incinerator except one schematic labeled it as 5,000 dscfm. The temperature change across
the catalyst is reported three times during each run. The lacquer analysis is referred to in the document
so the document in hand is only part of the whole or the document does not contain the information.
This report was already assigned an "A" rating for data quality. (pdg3)
Owens-Illinois Closure Incorporated. Glassboro, NJ. 11/18/87 - The source of the VOCs is
Owens-Illinois Litho Coater line 029. The only VOCs tested were MIBK, m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene,
ethyl benzene, and isophrone. In the text they claim 200-225 °F temperature change over the catalyst but
the data sheets show that temperature to be 310 °F. There is not sufficient documentation on how the
percentage of carbon was determined. Methods are sound but there are inconsistencies in the data. A
"B" data quality rating was already assigned. (pdg4)
Pittsburgh Metal Lithographing Company. Fallsington, PA. 10/13/88 - Pages 13-70 are missing.
The catalyst is referred to but it is not clear whether the incinerator is catalytic or non-catalytic, and no
temperature change across the catalyst is reported. Methods for moisture, velocity, flow rate, and
temperature are not mentioned so these tests were assigned a "B" data quality rating. (pdg5)
Graphic Packaging Corporation. Paoli. PA. 12/09/86 - The sources for the VOCs are Extruders
Nos. 90 and 7, a flexographie press No. 67, a letter press No. 17, and an eight-station rotogravure press
No. 8; these are used for commercial packaging materials printed on paper. Temperature data are on the
summary sheets but not on the data sheets. Usage rates for the applied coating are missing, and the rates
reported appear to be averages that include time when the testing was not in progress. Data quality
rating was already assigned as "C." (pdg6)
C-7
-------
Constant Services Inc.. 12/20/88 - Emissions from three Lembo U-type rotogravure and one
laminating printer are fed into a Huntington Energy thermal incinerator. Capture efficiency calculations
are missing from the document. Units on the data sheets are missing. The summation of the individual
chemicals on the sheets in Appendix B is greater than the figure reported on the page marked "ink
solvent content breakdown" by 6.66 percent. Xylol was used in test but not tested for. A data quality
rating of "C" was already assigned to the Method 25A data, and a data quality rating of "B" was assigned
to the Method 18 data because the data on the data sheets did not agree with the data on the summary
page. (pdg7)
J. Joseohson Incorporated. South Hackensack, NJ. 12/16/88 - The sources of the VOCs in this
test are two tray and roller type laminating printers for textile, paper, plastic, and Mylar, Ink
formulations not included for capture efficiency calculations. All methods are documented and the data
sheets are included so an "A" data quality rating was assigned to these tests. Ink formulations are not
included for capture efficiency calculations, (pdg8)
Ames Rubber Company. Hamburg. NJ. 01/04/90 - Facility electrostatically applies elastomer and
adhesive to metal rolls for use in photocopiers. Eight booths are ducted to one thermal incinerator.
Outlet flow rate significantly less than inlet flow rate, possibly due to poor flow distribution at sample
location. Claim capture efficiency invalid because of variability but operation data seem reasonable.
Design flow velocities given for each booth but insufficient data to determine total enclosure. Sample by
both NJ3.7 and NJ3.9. (dfn020)
Unifoil Corporation, 02/25/93 - The sources for the VOCs in these tests are laminators Nos. 1, 2,
and 4. No process data were given. No solvent application data were supplied. Temperature change
across the catalyst had to be taken from temperature graphs that were not well-labeled. An "A" data
rating was assigned to the supplied data, but it should be noted that data were missing for capture
efficiency. (pdg9)
-------
3M Company. Freehold. NJ. 08/08/90 - The tests were performed on the "133 coater" and the "36
tower," both part of an adhesive tape manufacturing process. Solvent application data reported as pounds
of VOC/h; the solvent was not analyzed. The methods are sound and the data test sheets are included so
an "A" data quality rating was assigned. (pdglO)
General Motors Corporation. Fisher Division Trenton. NJ. 06/29/88 - Three tests were run on an
autobody primer coating line. There is no solvent application rate or process rate data. An "A" data
quality rating was assigned to the data that is supplied because it is accurate and all of the data sheets are
included, (pdgll)
Gomar Manufacturing. Linden NJ. 12/17/91 - Polyester film is coated with red epoxy, Coating
line is enclosed in a room conforming to "Procedure T" implying 100 percent capture. The flame in the
drying oven uses VOC-laden air for combustion so some VOC destruction may take place before the
inlet sampling location. EPA Method 25 was performed at inlet and outlet. EPA Methods 18 and 25A
were performed at the outlet, making them unusable only for calculation of control device efficiency. A
low audit sample was 62.6 percent higher than expected and a high audit sample was 48.4 percent lower
than expected. The OAQPS dBASE rating of "A" for this report should be reconsidered in light of audit
results. (csOOl)
Alcan Building Products. Woodbridae. NJ. 01/04/90 - Aluminum is roll coated for construction
purposes. Two coating lines, primer and topcoater, are ducted to a catalytic incinerator. Usage rates are
recorded; however, limited data are available on the amount of VOC carbon in the coatings. Sampling
method was NJ 3 which requires capture of sample and subsequent analysis by FID as methane. The
data indicate no separation or calibration to individual components. The closest comparison to an EPA
method would therefore be EPA Method 25A. New catalyst installed at this facility not able to show
required/guarantee DRE of 95 percent. (cs002)
C-9
-------
Crown Roll Leaf, Inc., Paterson. NJ. 01/20/87 - Rotogravure printing on four separate lines
ducted to the same control device. Each line has different allowable emissions, but individual device
operating information is not given. Testing appears to have been for initial permit implying a new
control device but this is not explicitly stated. Description of sampling was very sketchy but it appears
that EPA 1-4 have been used for velocity and humidity. The report was not rated in OAQPS dBASE file.
Assigned a rating of "C" because of lack of operating and sampling details. (cs003)
Union Camp Corporation, Enelewood. NJ. 05/24/88 - Testing of a seven color rotogravure press
by EPA Method 25A, The FID was calibrated with n-butyl acetate because this was the primary solvent.
Solvent analysis was performed for n-butyl acetate but did not quantify other solvents. The catalytic
incinerator went down during second test. Thermocouples were installed at the catalyst inlet and outlet
but outlet temperature was illegible on the photocopy. (cs004)
Advanced Printing Technology, Inc., Morgantown, PA, 06/29/89 - Two rotogravure presses
ducted to the same thermal incinerator. The incinerator was to be ran at 1,500 °F but no verification data
were presented. Sampling was performed per EPA Method 25A. Tedlar bag samples were also pulled
for methane but details describing these locations were lacking. Though there was insufficient data to
verify total enclosure, a curtained enclosure is indicated with negative pressure supported by the
observation the curtains were being drawn inward during each test. Solvent usage was based on
production rates and average solids laydown. The incinerator was equipped with a regenerative heat
recovery system and a secondary heat recovery system. Inlet flow was higher than outlet flow in two of
the three tests, which testing company explains as being due to throttling of an induced draft fan after the
incinerator but before the outlet sample point. (cs005)
Unifoil Corporation, Passaic, NJ, 11/10/87 - Three laminating lines ducted to a single catalytic
incinerator. Solvent usage calculated from production rates and laydown but no solids content was
available in the report. It appears they used total of unquantified compounds as solids. Testing for
C-10
-------
individual pollutants and THC by NJ 3.9. Do not meet NJ 3,9 Quality Assurance requirements.
Compounds not detected in analysis were treated as zero by reviewer. Test for THC from remote sample
indicates much lower inlet emissions than the sum of the component emissions. (es006)
C-ll
-------
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------- |