United States Environmental Protection Agency The Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 3]: Data Summary, January 2017 EPA uses the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) program to collect data for contaminants suspected to be present in drinking water, but that do not have health-based standards set under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Every five years EPA develops a new list of UCMR contaminants, largely based on the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL). The SDWA Amendments of 1996 provide for: • Monitoring no more than 30 contaminants per 5-year cycle • Monitoring only a representative sample of public water systems (PWSs) serving less than or equal to 10,000 people • Storing analytical results in a National Contaminant Occurrence Database (NCOD) UCMR 3 required monitoring for 30 contaminants (28 chemicals and two viruses) between 2013 and 2015 using analytical methods developed by EPA, consensus organizations or both. This monitoring provides a basis for future regulatory determinations and/or other actions to protect public health. This dataset represents the twelfth and final NCOD release of analytical results for UCMR 3. Additional reference material is available to assist with the assessment of the UCMR 3 data. • EPA's UCMR 3 website • Instructions for importing and viewing UCMR 3 results • Additional information for the UCMR 3 contaminants on the CCL & Regulatory Determination website To perform additional data analyses, EPA suggests importing each field into your choice of software as text. Some of the IDs can be misinterpreted as long integer field types when they actually contain alpha characters. Data are presented as tab delimited text files, with field names included in the first row of each file and no text • Select "UCMR 3 Occurrence Data" to find the text file containing ALL results to date (UCMR3_All.txt) • Select "UCMR 3 Occurrence Data by State" to find the text files containing ALL results to date for tribes and states AK-LA (UCMR3_AII_Tribes_AK_LA.txt) and states MA-WY (UCMR3_AII_MA_WY.txt) • Select "UCMR 3 Occurrence Data by Method Classification" to find method-specific text files (\JCMR3_MethodNumber.txt, example UCMR3_200_8 for EPA method 200.8) • Text file containing disinfectant residual type (UCMR3_DRT.txt) • Text file containing the U.S. Postal Service zip code(s) for all areas served by a PWS (UCMR3_ZipCodes.txt) Samples collected at the maximum residence time in the distribution system (MR) were required to be analyzed for metals (including chromium-6) and chlorate. PWSs monitoring for Method 300.1 (chlorate) reported disinfectant types. In addition to reporting occurrence data for UCMR 3 target analytes, EPA tasked its small-system contract-support laboratories with reporting results for sec-butylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, tellurium, germanium and manganese. These additional unregulated analytes are within the scope of the methods already being performed for the UCMR analytes. Population categories are based on retail population as indicated by the Safe Drinking Water Information System (Federal) (SDWIS/FED) as of December 31, 2010. Office of Water (MS-140) EPA 815-S-17-001 January 2017 UCMR 3 Data Considerations qualifier: ------- UCMR 3 Data Field Names and Definitions | Field Name Definition PWSID Public Water System Identification Code, 9-character identification code (Begins with the standard 2-character postal State abbreviation or Region code, and the remaining seven numbers are unique to each PWS in the state) PWSName Name of the Public Water System (PWS) Size Size category of the PWS for UCMR, based on retail population as of December 31, 2010: S (< 10,000), L (> 10,000) FacilitylD Public Water System Facility Identification Code, 5-digit identification code FacilityName Name of the facility at the PWS FacilityWaterType Source of water at the facility: SW (surface water), GW (ground water), GU (ground water under the direct influence of surface water), MX (Any combination of: SW, GW and GU) SamplePointID Identification code for each sample point location in the PWS SamplePointName Name of the sample point for every sample point ID at a PWS SamplePointType Sampling Point Type Code: EP (entry point to the distribution system), MR (distribution system at maximum residence time) Associated FacilitylD The facility ID of the associated MR AssociatedSamplePointlD The sample point ID of the associated MR Disinfectant Type CLGA (Gaseous Chlorine), CLOF (Offsite Generated Hypochlorite, stored as liquid), CLON (Onsite Generated Hypochlorite, no storage), CAGC (Chloramine, formed from gaseous chlorine), CAOF (Chloramine, formed from offsite hypochlorite), CAON (Chloramine, formed from onsite hypochlorite), CLDO (Chlorine Dioxide), OZON (Ozone), ULVL (Ultraviolet Light), OTHD (All other types of disinfectant), NODU (No Disinfectant Used) CollectionDate Date of sample collection (month, day, year) SamplelD Identification code for each sample, as defined by the laboratory Contaminant Unregulated contaminant being analyzed in UCMR 3 MRL Minimum Reporting Level defined by UCMR 3 in |ag/L for the chemicals UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 2 of 12 ------- Field Name Definition MethodID Identification code of the analytical method AnalyticalResultsSign Less than (<) the minimum reporting level (MRL) or equal to (=) a numeric value at or above the MRL AnalyticalResultValue Numeric value of the analytical result in |ag/L for the chemicals, null values represent less than MRL SampleEventCode Identification code for each sample event. Includes sample event one (SE1), sample event two (SE2), sample event three (SE3), and sample event four (SE4). MonitoringRequirement AM (Assessment Monitoring, List 1), SS (Screening Survey, List 2), PST (Pre-Screen Testing, List 3) Region EPA Region (States): 1 (CT, ME, MA, NH, Rl, VT), 2 (NJ, NY, PR (Puerto Rico), VI (Virgin Islands)), 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), 5 (IL, IN, Ml, MN, OH, Wl), 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX), 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), 9 (AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS (American Samoa), GU (Guam), MP (Northern Marianas Islands), NN (Navajo Nation)), 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA) State State abbreviation ZipCode U.S. Postal Service zip code(s) for all areas being served water by a PWS UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 3 of 12 ------- UCMR 3 Chemical Contaminants and Methods Contaminant Contaminant Full Name CAS1 Number Method ID Method Name Monitoring Requirement 1,2,3-trichloropropane 1,2,3-trichloropropane 96-18-4 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM 1,3-butadiene 1,3-butadiene 106-99-0 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM Chloromethane methyl chloride 74-87-3 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM 1,1-dichloroethane 1,1-dichloroethane 75-34-3 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM Bromomethane methyl bromide 74-83-9 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM HCFC-22 chlorodifluoromethane 75-45-6 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM Halon 1011 bromochloromethane 74-97-5 524.3 Volatile Organic Compounds AM 1,4-dioxane 1,4-dioxane 123-91-1 522 Synthetic Organic Compound AM Vanadium vanadium 7440-62-2 200.8 Metals AM Molybdenum molybdenum 7439-98-7 200.8 Metals AM Cobalt cobalt 7440-48-4 200.8 Metals AM Strontium strontium 7440-24-6 200.8 Metals AM Chromium total chromium N/A 200.8 Metals AM Chromium-6 chromium-6 18540-29-9 218.7 Chromium-6 AM Chlorate chlorate 14866-68-3 300.1 Oxyhalide Anion AM PFOS perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 1763-23-1 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM PFOA perfluorooctanoic acid 335-67-1 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM PFNA perfluorononanoic acid 375-95-1 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM PFHxS perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 355-46-4 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM PFHpA perfluoroheptanoic acid 375-85-9 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM PFBS perfluorobutanesulfonic acid 375-73-5 537 Perfluorinated Compounds AM 173-estradiol estradiol 50-28-2 539 Hormones SS 17a-ethynylestradiol ethinyl estradiol 57-63-6 539 Hormones SS Estriol 16-a-hydroxyestradiol 50-27-1 539 Hormones SS Equilin equilin 474-86-2 539 Hormones SS Estrone estrone 53-16-7 539 Hormones SS Testosterone testosterone 58-22-0 539 Hormones SS 4-androstene-3,17-dione 4-androstene-3,17-dione 63-05-8 539 Hormones SS 1Chemical Abstract Service UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 4 of 12 ------- UCMR 3 Microbiological Contaminants and Methods Contaminant Method ID Method Name Monitoring Requirement Enteroviruses EPA 1615A Enterovirus cell culture PST Enteroviruses EPA 1615B Enterovirus RT-qPCR PST Noro viruses EPA 1615C Norovirus genogroup I with RT-qPCR primer set A PST Noro viruses EPA 1615D Norovirus genogroup I with RT-qPCR primer set B PST Noro viruses EPA 1615E Noroviruses genogroup II PST Total coliforms SM 9223B Colilert® PST E.coli SM 9223B Colilert® PST Enterococci ASTM D6503-99 Enterolert® PST Aerobic spores SM 9218 Aerobic endospores PST Somatic phage EPA 1602 Bacteriophage PST Male specific phage EPA 1602 Bacteriophage PST UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 5 of 12 ------- UCMR 3 Reference Concentrations for Chemical Contaminants For the third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 3) chemicals were being studied at levels that were often significantly below those in prior UCMR cycles. Importantly, UCMR 3 minimum reporting levels (MRLs) were established based on the capability of the analytical method, not based on a level established as "significant" or "harmful." In fact, the UCMR 3 MRLs are often below current "health reference levels" (to the extent that HRLs have been established). Results of UCMR 3 measurements should be interpreted accordingly. The detection of a UCMR 3 contaminant above the MRL does not represent cause for concern, in and of itself. Rather, the implications of the detection should be judged considering health effects information (which is often still under development or being refined for unregulated contaminants). The intent of the following table is to identify draft UCMR reference concentrations, where possible, to provide context around the detection of a particular UCMR contaminant above the MRL. The draft reference concentration does not represent an "action level" (EPA requires no particular action1'2 based simply on the fact that UCMR monitoring results exceed draft reference concentrations), nor should the draft reference concentration be interpreted as any indication of an Agency intent to establish a future drinking water regulation for the contaminant at this or any other level. Decisions as to whether or not to regulate the contaminant in drinking water will continue to be made following the Agency's Regulatory Determination process. Visit EPA's Regulatory Determination website for more information. The following key principles guided the development of the table: (1) The reference concentrations are based on publicaIly-available health information found in the following EPA resources: 2012 Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, the CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets, the Human Health Benchmark for Pesticides (HHBPs), the Integrated Information Risk System (IRIS), or the 2014 Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on CCL 3. The primary/secondary sources of health information vary with respect to scientific rigor from health assessment to single studies and are cited in the table. (2) If health information was available from more than one of the EPA resources listed above, the most recent health information was used for the draft reference concentrations. (3) Where both cancer and non-cancer draft reference concentrations existed, the lower (more conservative) of the two concentrations was used. For chemicals with reference concentrations based on a cancer endpoint, the table presents a range of values associated with 10"6 to 10"4 cancer risk. For chemicals with reference concentrations based on a non-cancer endpoint, the duration of exposure (short-term, intermediate/long-term, chronic) of the toxicity factor (e.g., Reference Dose) used as the basis for the reference concentration is shown. Recognizing that additional health effects information will become available over time, those attempting to assess UCMR occurrence data are encouraged to visit EPA's Drinking Water Contaminant Human Health Effects Information website for the most recent information. 1 Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) and Public Notification (PN) reporting requirements (see 40 CFR 141.153(d) and 141.207, respectively) apply to PWSs; CCR requires particular reporting based on measurements relative to the UCMR method reporting limits (MRLs) defined in 40 CFR 141.40. 2States may establish requirements for drinking water contaminants not yet regulated by EPA, and those requirements may be based on state- established levels that differ from EPA's reference concentrations. PWSs are responsible for being aware of and complying with their state's requirements, if any. UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 6 of 12 ------- Contaminant MRL (ng/L) Reference Concentration (H9/L) Reference Concentration based on a Cancer Endpoint (Y/N) EPA Reference(s) Cobalt 1 70 N (intermediate exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets Molybdenum1 1 40 N (chronic exposure) 2012 Edition of the Health Advisories Table Strontium2 0.3 1,500 N (chronic exposure) Federal Register Notice for the Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on CCL 3 Vanadium3 0.2 21 N (intermediate exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets Chromium (Total) 0.2 100 N (chronic exposure) The MCL for the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation Chromium-64 0.03 NA - - Chlorate 20 210 N (chronic exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets 1,4-dioxane5 0.07 0.35 to 35 Y 2012 Edition of the Health Advisories Table 1,1-dichloroethane5 0.03 6.14 to 614 Y CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets 1,2,3-trichloropropane5'6'7 0.03 0.0004 to 0.04 Y 2009 IRIS Assessment 1 The 2012 Edition of the Health Advisories Table and the CCL4 Contaminant Information Sheets (35 ng/L) have slightly different numbers due to rounding. 2 The reference concentration is based on the HRL cited in the preliminary regulatory determination for strontium [Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0155]. 3 The ATSDR, 1992 used for the CCL4 Contaminant Information Sheets is no longer publically available and has been replaced by a new assessment (ATSDR, 2012). The minimum risk level (RfD equivalent) was 0.003 mg/kg/day for minor renal effects in an animal study (ATSDR, 1992) compared to 0.01 mg/kg/day for lack of minor effects in blood pressure, body weight, and hematological parameters in a human study with a 12 week exposure (ATSDR, 2012). 4 The contaminant is on the IRIS Agenda for either a new assessment or an updated assessment; check status here. 5 Reference Concentration range based on cancer risk of 10"6 to 10"4. 610 s cancer risk < MRL < 10"4 cancer risk. 7 To derive the reference concentration, age dependent adjustment factors were applied to the IRIS oral slope factor of 30 per mg/kg-day (calculated using adult exposure data) to address presumed early-life susceptibility for this chemical (per EPA's Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment). UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 7 of 12 ------- Contaminant MRL (ng/L) Reference Concentration (H9/L) Reference Concentration based on a Cancer Endpoint (Y/N) EPA Reference(s) 1,3-butadiene5'6 0.1 0.0103 to 1.03 Y CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets HCFC-22 (chlorodifluoromethane)8 0.08 NA - - Chloromethane (methyl chloride)5 0.2 2.69 to 269 Y CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets Halon 1011 (bromochloromethane)9 0.06 90 N (chronic exposure) 2012 Edition of the Health Advisories Table Bromomethane (methyl bromide) 0.2 140 N (chronic exposure) Human Health Benchmark for Pesticides (HHBPs) PFBS 0.09 NA - - PFHpA 0.01 NA - - PFHxS 0.03 NA - - PFNA 0.02 NA - - PFOS 0.04 0.07 N (chronic exposure) Health Advisory and Supporting Documentation for PFOS PFOA 0.02 0.07 N (chronic exposure) Health Advisory and Supporting Documentation for PFOA 17a-ethynylestradiol (ethinyl estradiol) 0.0009 0.035 N (chronic exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets 173-estradiol (estradiol)5 0.0004 0.0009 to 0.09 Y CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets 8 The CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets provide a reference level of 31.5 ng/L; the number is based on a single LOAEL from a 1983 study. 9 The 2012 Edition of the Health Advisories Table and the CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets (70 ng/L) have slightly different numbers due to rounding. UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 8 of 12 ------- Contaminant MRL (ng/L) Reference Concentration (H9/L) Reference Concentration based on a Cancer Endpoint (Y/N) EPA Reference(s) Equilin 0.004 0.35 N (chronic exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets Estriol (16-a-hydroxyestradiol) 0.0008 0.35 N (chronic exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets Estrone 0.002 0.35 N (chronic exposure) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets 4-androstene-3,17-dione 0.0003 NA - - Testosterone 0.0001 NA - - UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 9 of 12 ------- Terms a) UCMR Draft Reference Concentration = The reference concentrations are based on publically-available health information found in the following EPA resources: 2012 Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (HAs), the CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets (i.e., HRLs), the Human Health Benchmark for Pesticides (HHBPs), or the 2014 Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on CCL 3 (i.e., HRLs). The primary/secondary sources of health information vary with respect to scientific rigor from health assessment to single studies. Many of the contaminants are currently under regulatory review or development and are subject to change as new health assessments are completed. b) MRL = UCMR Minimum Reporting Level. [Note that the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR) uses the term "MRL" for a different purpose (i.e., to describe "Minimal Risk Levels"). The UCMR term and the ATSDR term have no relationship to each other.] c) HAs = Health advisories. HAs provide information on contaminants that can cause human health effects and are known or anticipated to occur in drinking water. EPA's health advisories are non-enforceable and non-regulatory and provide technical information to state agencies and other public health officials on health effects, analytical methodologies, and treatment technologies to assist with risk management decisions. d) HRLs = Health Reference Levels. The CCL process derives HRLs using single studies to health assessments for screening purposes. The CCL HRLs derived from health assessments are used in the Regulatory Determination process as risk-derived concentrations against which to evaluate the occurrence data to determine if contaminants may occur at levels of public health concern. HRLs are not final determinations about the level of a contaminant in drinking water that is necessary to protect any particular population and are derived prior to development of a complete exposure assessment. e) MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. The highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. f) Cancer Risk of 10~6 to 10~4 = the concentration of a contaminant in drinking water corresponding to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of one-in-a-million (lx 10"6) to one-in-ten-thousand (1 x 10~4). The 2012 Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories provide the cancer risk at 1 x 10~4. The CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets provide the cancer risk at lx 10~6. g) LOAEL = Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level h) NA = Not Available i) Short-term = Typically refers to animal toxicological studies with an exposure duration of days to weeks. j) Intermediate/Longer-term = Typically refers to animal toxicological studies with an exposure duration of weeks to months. k) Chronic = Typically refers to animal toxicological studies with an exposure duration of months to years; representing a lifetime exposure in humans. References 2012 Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/drinking-water-contaminant-human-health-effects-information) CCL 4 Contaminant Information Sheets (https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-ll/documents/815rl6003.pdf) Human Health Benchmark for Pesticides (HHBPs) (https://ofmpub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/f?p=109:3) Announcement of Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on the Third Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List (https://www.epa.gov/ccl/regulatorv- determination-3) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/atoz.cfm) UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 10 of 12 ------- January 2017 UCMR 3 Data Summary for Chemical Contaminants Contaminant MRL (Hg/L) Reference Concentration (Hg/L) Total number of results Number of results >MRL Number of resu Its >Reference Concentration % of total resu Its >Reference Concentration Total number of PWSs with resu Its Number of PWSs with resu Its >MRL Number of PWSs with resu Its >Reference Concentration % of PWSs with results >Reference Concentration 1,2,3-trichloropropane 0.03 0.0004 / 0.041 36,848 256 256/1971 0.7% / 0.57O1 4,916 67 67 / 551 1.4% / 1.1%1 1,3-butadiene 0.1 0.0103/1.031 36,848 2 2 / 01 0.005% / 0%1 4,916 2 2 / 01 0.04% / 0%1 Chloromethane 0.2 2.69/2691 36,845 283 20 /01 0.05% / 0%1 4,916 138 8 / 01 0.2% / 0%1 1,1-dichloroethane 0.03 6.14/6141 36,848 835 I/O1 0.003% / 0%x 4,916 244 I/O1 0.02% / 0%1 Bromomethane 0.2 140 36,848 115 0 0% 4,916 49 0 0% HCFC-22 0.08 NA 36,847 827 -- -- 4,916 286 -- -- Halon 1011 0.06 90 36,847 655 0 0% 4,916 309 0 0% 1,4-dioxane 0.07 0.35/351 36,810 4,197 1,081 / 01 2.9 % / 0%1 4,915 1,077 341/ 01 6.9% / 0%1 Vanadium 0.2 21 62,981 37,954 1,680 2.7% 4,922 3,625 163 3.3% Molybdenum 1 40 62,986 25,377 151 0.2% 4,922 2,546 40 0.8% Cobalt 1 70 62,982 833 3 0.005% 4,922 247 3 0.06% Strontium 0.3 1,500 62,913 62,799 1,739 2.8% 4,922 4,922 286 5.8% Chromium 0.2 100 62,917 31,773 1 0.002% 4,922 3,660 1 0.02% Chromium-6 0.03 NA 62,837 47,503 -- -- 4,919 4,401 -- -- Chlorate 20 210 62,859 34,426 9,796 15.6% 4,918 3,391 1,896 38.6% PFOS 0.04 0.07 36,972 292 124 0.3% 4,920 95 46 0.9% PFOA 0.02 0.07 36,972 379 32 0.09% 4,920 117 13 0.3% PFNA 0.02 NA 36,972 19 -- -- 4,920 14 -- -- PFHxS 0.03 NA 36,971 207 -- -- 4,920 55 -- -- PFHpA 0.01 NA 36,972 236 -- -- 4,920 86 -- -- PFBS 0.09 NA 36,972 19 -- -- 4,920 8 -- -- 17(3-estradiol 0.0004 0.0009 / 0.091 11,795 4 I/O1 0.008% / 0%x 1,201 2 I/O1 0.08% / 0%1 17a-ethynylestradiol 0.0009 0.035 11,796 4 0 0% 1,201 4 0 0% Estriol 0.0008 0.35 11,796 4 0 0% 1,201 4 0 0% Equilin 0.004 0.35 11,796 0 0 0% 1,201 0 0 0% Estrone 0.002 0.35 11,796 0 0 0% 1,201 0 0 0% Testosterone 0.0001 NA 11,795 72 -- -- 1,201 65 -- -- 4-androstene-3,17-dione 0.0003 NA 11,796 101 -- -- 1,201 77 -- -- 1Where two reference concentrations are listed, the first number is associated with a 10 6 cancer risk; the second number a 10 4 cancer risk. Where two results are presented the first number is associated with the first reference concentration; the second number is associated with the second reference concentration. UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 11 of 12 ------- January 2017 UCMR 3 Data Summary for Microbiological Contaminants Contaminant MRL Unit Total number of results Number of results >MRL Total number of PWSs with results Number of PWSs with results >MRL Aerobic spores 1 SFOVlOO mL2 1,047 317 793 252 E. coli 1 MPN3/100 mL 1,045 3 791 3 Enterococci 1 MPN/100 mL 1,044 41 792 41 Enteroviruses (cell culture) 0.002 MPN/L4 1,044 2 789 2 Enteroviruses (RT-qPCR5) 0.398 GC6/L 1,044 6 789 6 Male specific phage 1 PFU7/100 mL 1,029 14 783 14 Noroviruses GIA8 0.398 GC/L 1,044 4 789 4 Noroviruses GIB9 0.398 GC/L 1,044 2 789 2 Noroviruses Gil10 0.398 GC/L 1,044 4 789 4 Somatic phage 1 PFU/100 mL 1,029 5 783 5 Total coliforms 1 MPN/100 mL 1,045 57 791 53 ^FO = Spore Forming Units 6GC = Genomic Copies 2mL = milliliters 7PFU = Plaque Forming Units 3MPN = Most Probable Number 8Noroviruses GIA = qPCR analysis of Norovirus genogroup I with RT-qPCR primer set A 4L = liters 9Noroviruses GIB = qPCR analysis of Norovirus genogroup I with RT-qPCR primer set B 5RT-qPCR = Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction 10Noroviruses Gil = qPCR analysis of Norovirus genogroup II UCMR 3 Minimum Reporting Levels for Microbiological Contaminants Under UCMR 3 microbe analytical results are reported as "below", "at" or "above" MRL. UCMR 3 MRLs were established based on the capability of the analytical method. It is important to note that microbial contamination can be transient in nature and microbial detections under UCMR 3 should be interpreted in the context of the time samples were collected. However, the presence of any UCMR 3 microbe indicates a potential vulnerability of the PWS to contamination. UCMR 3, January 2017 Page 12 of 12 ------- |