BACKGROUND DOCUMENT
REPORT ON REVISIONS TO 5th EDITION AP-42
CHAPTER 15 - ORDNANCE DETONATION
EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED BASED ON FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY PHASE II
SERIES 1 TESTING CONDUCTED AT ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
Prepared for:
U.S. Army Environmental Center
ATTN: SFIM-AEC-ATT
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5401
July 2006

-------
NOTICE
The information in this document has been funded by the U.S. Army Environmental Center
(USAEC) and prepared by MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc. under Contract No. GS-10F-0131K, Order
No. DAKF11-01-F-0072. It has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade
names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION	1
2.0 COMPOUNDS MEASURED AND EMISSION MEASUREMENT METHODS	3
2.1	Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen, and Sulfur Dioxide	5
2.2	Sulfur Hexafluoride and Ammonia	5
2.3	Total Suspended Particulate	5
2.4	Particulate Matter with an Aerodynamic Diameter Less than or Equal to 10 or 2.5 Microns .. 5
2.5	Metals	6
2.6	Volatile Organic Compounds	6
2.7	Semi volatile Organic Compounds and Poly cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons	6
2.8	Dioxin and Furan Compounds	6
2.9	Acid Gases	7
2.10	Hydrogen Cyanide	7
2.11	Aldehydes and Carbonyl Compounds	7
2.12	Hydrocarbons, n-Hexane, and Sulfur Hexafluoride	7
2.13	Energetic Materials	7
3.0 TEST DATA ANALYSIS AND RATING	8
3.1	EPA Guidance Regarding Test Data Quality Ratings	8
3.2	Analysis of Test Data	9
3.3	Test Data Quality Ratings	14
4.0 EMISSION FACTOR CALCULATIONS	15
4.1	Correction of Sample Volume to Stationary Source Program Standard Conditions	16
4.2	Incorporation of Analytical Detection-Limits to the Test Data	17
4.3	Determination of Background Concentration	17
4.4	Determination of Test Compound Concentration	18
4.5	Determination of Background-Corrected Concentration	19
4.6	Determination of Dilution-Corrected Concentration	21
4.7	Determination of Mass of Compound Released	21
4.8	Determination of Emission Factors	21
4.9	Determination of Average Emission Factors per Configuration	21
4.10	Determination of Average Emission Factors Across Configurations	21
5.0 EMISSION FACTOR RATINGS	22
5.1	Emission Factor Ratings Assigned - Based on Ordnance-Specific Test Data	23
5.2	Emission Factor Ratings Assigned - Based on All Available Test Data	23
6.0 REFERENCES	32
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
i

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
APPENDIX A:
COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
ORDNANCE INCLUDED IN FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY PHASE II
SERIES 1 TESTING, ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
APPENDIX B:
NEW AP-42 SECTIONS FOR ORDNANCE INCLUDED IN FIRING POINT
EMISSION STUDY PHASE II SERIES 1 TESTING AT ABERDEEN
PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
APPENDIX C:
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AP-42 SECTIONS FOR ORDNANCE INCLUDED
IN FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY PHASE II SERIES 1 TESTING AT
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
LIST OF TABLES
No. Title	Page
1	Configurations of Propelling Charge, Zone and Cannon Type for Which Emission Factors Were
Developed	1
2	Ordnance Net Explosive Weight	2
3	Emission Test Methods Used	3
4	Compounds Measured Using More than One Test or Analytical Method	11
5	Downgraded Data Quality Ratings	14
6	Background Run Information	18
7	Ordnance Categorization for Emission Factor Correlation Assessment	24
LIST OF FIGURES
No. Title	Page
1 Calculation of background-corrected concentration	20
Ordnance Detonation	7/06

-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Due to the lack of credible data concerning emissions from training ordnance when used in their
tactical configurations, the U.S. Army Environmental Center (USAEC) established a program to quantify
emissions from the detonation of ordnance. This document presents background information concerning
the development of air emission factors for five tactical configurations of a 155-mm propelling charge
used during training exercises at U.S. Army installations. The propelling charge is identified by its
Department of Defense Identification Code (DODIC), D540. The air emission factors were developed
from test data collected by USAEC and are only representative of emissions associated with the use of the
propelling charge itself. Emissions associated with the explosion of projectiles are addressed elsewhere.
Five tactical configurations were tested to address emission product variation as a function of
propelling charge, charge size (zone), and cannon type. Two 155-mm propelling charges, M3 and M3A1,
were tested. Potential emission product changes caused by the muzzle flash reduction additive in the
M3A1 charge were investigated. To gain insight into differences in combustion product distribution that
might occur with larger amounts of propellant, two charge sizes, zone 3 and zone 5, were tested. As
compared to zone 5, the zone 3 charge is for shorter range use, requires less propellant, and thus is a
smaller charge size. Two types of cannon, the Ml99 and M284 howitzer, were used to investigate
emission product differences caused by a bore evacuator; the M248 has a bore evacuator, while the Ml99
does not. Configurations of propelling charge, zone, and cannon type for which emission factors have
been developed are identified in Table 1.
TABLE 1 CONFIGURATIONS OF PROPELLING CHARGE, ZONE, AND CANNON TYPE FOR
WHICH EMISSION FACTORS WERE DEVELOPED
DODIC
Configuration
No.
Configuration
Propelling
Charge
Charge Zone
Howitzer
Cannon

1
M3
3
M199

2
M3
5
M199
D540
3
M3A1
3
M199

4
M3
3
M284

5
M3A1
3
M284
The emission factors described in this document are based on data obtained during testing
conducted at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, as presented in the final test report titled Report No. 1
for the Firing Point Emission Study Phase II1 and the document titled Detailed Test Plan for the Firing
Point Emission Characterization of the Propelling Charges, 155MMM3 andM3Al - Test Matrix No. I.2
These documents were supplemented by additional data provided by the testing contractor.3 For each
configuration, one test run, using two sampling trains, was conducted. One ordnance was detonated per
run. Source test protocols were developed by USAEC before any testing was conducted and were
reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Emission Measurement Center. The
tests were conducted between May 17 and June 7, 1999.
The compounds that were measured include carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (C02),
oxides of nitrogen (NOx), sulfur dioxide (S02), ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), total suspended
particulate (TSP), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 microns
(PM-10), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns (PM-2.5),
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
1

-------
metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), dioxin and furan
compounds, acid gases, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), aldehydes and carbonyl compounds, hydrocarbons,
poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and energetic materials. Within the AP-42 section, only
emission factors for criteria pollutants, carbon dioxide, hazardous air pollutants (as defined by ง112(b)(1)
of the Clean Air Act [CAA]), and toxic chemicals (as defined by ง313 of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act [EPCRA]) are presented.
The emission factors were developed on a "per item" basis and on a "per net explosive weight
(NEW)" basis. Users should choose the appropriate emission factor to estimate emissions based upon the
data available; either factor is equally valid. The NEW of each propelling charge tested is provided in
AP-42 Section 15.4.4 and in Table 2.
TABLE 2 ORDNANCE NET EXPLOSIVE WEIGHT

Configuration
No.
Configuration
NEW
(lb/item)a
DODIC
Propelling
Charge
Charge
Zone
Howitzer
Cannon

1
M3
3
M199
3.28

2
M3
5
M199
5.75
D540
3
M3A1
3
M199
3.50

4
M3
3
M284
3.28

5
M3A1
3
M284
3.50
aNEW values were obtained from Reference 1.
This document includes five sections in addition to this Introduction. Section 2 of this document
identifies the compounds measured during the test program and describes the emission measurement
methods used. Section 3 includes a discussion of the emission factor final test report and ratings for the
test data contained therein. Section 4 describes the calculations and methodologies used to develop
emission factors for each type of compound measured. Section 5 describes the methodology used to rate
the emission factors and provides emission factor ratings for each type of compound measured. Section 6
includes a complete list of the references cited in this document.
There are two appendices included with this document. Appendix A identifies, by configuration,
all of the compounds for which analyses were performed and the emission factors that were developed.
[Note: Compounds present in the method blank at greater than 50 percent of test levels are excluded from
Appendix A], Appendix A also identifies the minimum detection levels associated with all compounds
that were not detected. Emission factors and minimum detection levels presented in Appendix A were
determined from the most accurate method if two sampling or analytical methods were used to measure
one compound. Appendix B presents the new AP-42 sections for the five configurations of propelling
charge, zone, and weapon that were tested.
In addition to this document, there are electronic databases available on the web
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html') that contain the data used in the development of the
emission factors. The general procedures that were followed to develop these emission factors can be
found at the same web address under the title Procedures for Preparing Emission Factor Documents4
2
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
2.0 COMPOUNDS MEASURED AND EMISSION MEASUREMENT METHODS
The USAEC Firing Point Series I testing was conducted in the Main Front Firing Barricade 2
(B2) test facility located at the Aberdeen Test Center (ATC), Maryland. B2 is a reinforced concrete
structure with interior dimensions of approximately 74-feet wide by 70-feet deep by 36-feet high. The
internal volume of the B2 is 184,820 cubic feet. The opening at the front of B2 is closed with a polyvinyl
chloride strip-curtain. A steel blast shield, equipped with an internal door and remotely operated external
door, is located immediately in front of the strip curtain. Together, the shield and curtain absorb the blast
from the weapon's firing and allow the projectile to exit the facility while maintaining the required seal
for emissions characterization.
Six high volume fans located around the interior perimeter of the barricade ensure even
distribution of the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas and the weapon emission products. A separate
instrumentation and test control building is part of the facility. Instrumentation and firing of the weapon
are controlled remotely from this location. Instrumentation and equipment are in place to collect
emissions product data.
A number of different test methods were employed to collect and analyze the emission data that
were used to develop emission factors for firing of ordnance. Table 3 identifies each emission test
method used; bracketed information identifies the purpose of using the method. The emissions data were
collected using EPA test methods published in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50
(40 CFR 50); 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; and in Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic
Organic Compounds in Ambient Air5 Some of the sample analytical procedures used were from EPA
Office of Solid Waste (OSW) publication SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods6 and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition,7 Additional sampling and analytical procedures
were taken from Internal Operating Procedures (IOP) developed by the ATC Chemistry Team. Where
necessary, the test methods were adapted to reflect application to the unique testing of ordnance firing in
the B2.
TABLE 3 EMISSION TEST METHODS USED
Compound
Test Method
CO
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 10 - Determination of Carbon Monoxide
Emissions from Stationary Sources [sampling and analysis]
o
o
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 3 A - Measurement of Oxygen and Carbon
Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources [sampling and
analysis]
NOx
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 7E - Measurement of Nitrogen Oxides
Emissions from Stationary Sources [sampling and analysis]
so2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 6C - Measurement of Sulfur Dioxide
Emissions from Stationary Sources [sampling and analysis]
SF6, NH3 CH4,
CO, and C02
40 CFR 63, Appendix A, EPA Proposed Method 320 - Measurement of Vapor Phase
Organic and Inorganic Emissions By Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)
Spectroscopy [sampling and analysis]
7/06
Ordnance Detonation 3

-------
TABLE 3 (cont.)
Compound
Test Method
TSP
PM-10
PM-2.5
Metals
VOCs
PAHs
SVOCs
Dioxins and
Furans
Acid Gases
Hydrogen
Cyanide
Aldehydes and
Carbonyls
Hydrocarbons,
n- Hexane,
and SF6
Energetic
Materials
40 CFR 50, Appendix B - Reference Method for the Determination of Suspended
Particulate Matter as in the Atmosphere (High Volume Method) [sampling and
analysis]
40 CFR 50, Appendix J - Reference Method for the Determination of Particulate
Matter as PM-10 in the Atmosphere [sampling and analysis]
40 CFR 50, Appendix L - Reference Method for the Determination of Fine
Particulate Matter as PM-2.5 in the Atmosphere [sampling and analysis]
Metal sample was obtained from TSP sample [sampling]
40 CFR 50, Appendix G - Reference Method for Determination of Lead in Suspended
Particulate Matter Collected from Ambient Air [analysis]
EPA Compendium Method TO-14A - Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) in Ambient Air Using Specially-Prepared Canisters with Subsequent Analysis
By Gas Chromatography [sampling and analysis]
EPA Compendium Method TO-13 - Determination of Poly cyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Ambient Air Using Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS) [sampling and analysis]
EPA Compendium Method TO-13 - Determination of Poly cyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Ambient Air Using Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS) [sampling]
SW-846 Method 8270 Modified (SW8270M) - Semivolatile Organic Compounds by
Gas Chromatography /Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) [analysis]
EPA Compendium Method TO-9 - Determination of Polychlorinated,
Polybrominated and Brominated/Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans
in Ambient Air [sampling and analysis]
NIOSH Method 7903 - Inorganic Acids [sampling and analysis]
NIOSH Method 7904 - Aerosol and Gas Cyanides [sampling and analysis]
EPA Compendium Method TO-11A - Determination of Formaldehyde in Ambient Air
Using Adsorbent Cartridge Followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC) [sampling and analysis]
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 18 - Measurement of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Gas Chromatography [analysis for hydrocarbons] and GC/ECD
[analysis for SF6]
EPA Compendium Method TO-13 - Determination of Poly cyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Ambient Air Using Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS) [sampling]
USACHPPM-DLS SOP CAD 26.1 - Procedure For Analysis of Explosives in
Ambient Air [analysis]	
4
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
The following sections identify and briefly describe the test methods used to measure each
compound or group of compounds. Additional information regarding the operation of the B2 and the test
methods used is presented in Reference 2. EPA-approved methods were used by the laboratories that
provided sampling and analysis data.
2.1	Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen, and Sulfur Dioxide
Real-time concentrations of CO, C02, NOx, and S02 that resulted from the firing of ordnance in
the B2 were measured using a continuous emissions measurement system (CEMS). The final test report1
states that the compounds were measured using EPA reference methods as described in the following
paragraph. However, due to a lack of calibration data, the methodologies actually used could not be
confirmed.
CO sampling and analysis was conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A,
Method 10 - Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources, with a Thermo
Environmental Instruments, Inc. (TEI) nondispersive infrared analyzer. C02 sampling and analysis was
conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, Method 3A - Determination of Oxygen and
Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources, with a TEI nondispersive infrared
analyzer. NOx sampling and analysis was conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A,
Method 7E - Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources, with a TEI model
No. 10AR chemiluminescent analyzer. S02 sampling and analysis was conducted in accordance with
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, Method 6C - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary
Sources, with a TEI 43H pulsed fluorescent analyzer.
Each analyzer channel sampled at approximately 4 liters per minute (1pm) through Teflon-lined
polyethylene tubing with Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) ultra type H cartridge filters used to control
particulate. An inline Balstonฎ filter was used to trap condensation. Due to the ambient condition of the
samples, no heated probes or sample lines were used. Data was collected four times per second.
2.2	Sulfur Hexafluoride and Ammonia
Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to measure real-time
concentrations of the SF6 tracer gas and NH3, as well as to identify qualitatively the presence of CH4, CO,
and C02 using protocols modified from procedures in 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, EPA Proposed Method
320 - Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions By Extractive Fourier Transform
Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Samples were drawn continuously from the B2 at a nominal rate of
15 1pm for a minimum of 30 minutes. The FTIR spectra were collected and stored at a minimum of every
20 seconds.
2.3	Total Suspended Particulate
The TSP concentration that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 was determined using a
modified sampling and analysis procedure based on 40 CFR 50, Appendix B - Reference Method for the
Determination of Suspended Particulate Matter as in the Atmosphere (High Volume Method). A
Grasebyฎ ambient air sampling module equipped with a quartz fiber filter was used to extract test
chamber air through a Whatmanฎ filter at a nominal rate of 1.1 to 1.7 cubic meters per minute (m3/min)
for a sampling time of 30 minutes. The TSP concentration was computed by dividing the mass of TSP
collected by the volume of air sampled, corrected to standard conditions.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
5

-------
2.4	Particulate Matter with an Aerodynamic Diameter Less than or Equal to 10 or 2.5 Microns
The PM-10 and PM-2.5 concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were
determined using modified sampling and analysis procedures based on 40 CFR 50, Appendix J -
Reference Method for the Determination of Particulate Matter as PM-10 in the Atmosphere and
40 CFR 50, Appendix L - Reference Method for the Determination of Fine Particulate Matter as PM-2.5
in the Atmosphere. A Graseby high volume ambient air sampler with a PM-10 size selective inlet head
was used to collect the PM-10 particulate at an approximate sampling rate of 1.13 m3/min for 30 minutes.
The PM-2.5 particulate was determined using an R&P Partisolฎ FRM and WINS PM-2.5 impactor at an
approximate sampling rate of 16.7 1pm for 30 minutes. The PM-10 and PM-2.5 concentrations were
computed by dividing the masses of PM-10 and PM-2.5 collected by the volume of air sampled, corrected
to standard conditions.
2.5	Metals
Metal concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were determined using
particulate matter from the TSP samples collected as described in Section 2.3. The analyses followed the
procedures of 40 CFR 50, Appendix G, - Reference Method for the Determination of Lead in Suspended
Particulate Matter Collected from Ambient Air. The method was modified to include additional metals.
Concentrations of target metals were computed by dividing the mass of metal collected by the volume of
air sampled, corrected to standard conditions.
2.6	Volatile Organic Compounds
VOC concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were determined using the
Second Supplement to Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in
Ambient Air, Method TO-14A - Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air
Using Specially-Prepared Canisters With Subsequent Analysis By Gas Chromatography. Air samples
were collected for 30 minutes using a Scientific Instruments Specialists, Inc., pressurized canister sampler
and 6-liter silicon-lined SUMMA canister that was certified VOC-free prior to use. An analysis by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry in full scan mode followed.
2.7	Semivolatile Organic Compounds and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
SVOC and PAH concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were
determined based on procedures found in Method TO-13 - Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Ambient Air Using Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). During
each run, samples were collected using a PS-1 sampler equipped with a quartz fiber filter and XAD-2
adsorbent resin cartridges. The PS-1 sampling module was used to sample for 30 minutes at
0.125 m3/min. Following sampling, the filters and resin cartridges underwent solvent extraction and
analysis by GC/MS analysis in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The sample extracts were
reanalyzed in scan mode following modified procedures in SW-846 Method 8270 - Semivolatile Organic
Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Modifications are described in the
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM) standard operating
procedure (SOP) SV 72.4. Unknown compounds were tentatively identified using computerized mass
spectral matching techniques.
2.8	Dioxin and Furan Compounds
Polychlorinated dibenzodioxin (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzo furan (PCDF) compound
concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were determined based on procedures
6
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
found in Method TO-9 - Determination of Polychlorinated, Polybrominated and Brominated/Chlorinated
Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans. Samples were collected using modified PS-1 samplers with
quartz fiber particulate filters and polyurethane foam (PUF) packed cartridges. The PS-1 sampling
module was used to sample for 30 minutes at 0.225 m3/min. After sampling, the filters and cartridges
underwent extraction and analysis by GC/High Resolution Mass Spectroscopy according to
Method TO-9.
2.9	Acid Gases
Acid gas concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were determined
based on procedures found in NIOSH Method 7903 - Inorganic Acids. Acid gases were collected by
using silica gel sorbent tubes (ORBO-53) and a sampling pump. Sample gases were passed through the
sorbent tubes for 30 minutes at a rate of 0.5 1pm. Analysis was performed according to NIOSH
Method 7903 by ion chromatography as detailed in ATC IOP 372 - Anion Analysis using the ASM
Column.
2.10	Hydrogen Cyanide
HCN concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were determined using
NIOSH Method 7904 - Aerosol and Gas Cyanides, but utilizing modified sampling and analytical
procedures. The sample gas was drawn through an 0.8 micrometer PVC filter and an impinger containing
0.1 normal potassium hydroxide (KOH) for 30 minutes at a rate of 0.5 to 1 1pm. The impinger solution
and extracted filter were analyzed by ion selective electrode using procedures described in Galson
Laboratories SOP IC-N7904.R01.
2.11	Aldehydes and Carbonyl Compounds
Aldehyde and carbonyl compound concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the
B2 were determined using EPA Compendium Method TO-11A - Determination of Formaldehyde in
Ambient Air Using Adsorbent Cartridge Followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC), but utilizing modified sampling and analytical procedures. Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)
laden cartridge tubes were used as a direct probe to trap and derivatize aldehyde and carbonyl
compounds. Sample gases were extracted for 30 minutes from the test chamber through ozone denuders
at a rate of approximately 1 to 2 1pm using a rotary vane pump, manifold, critical orifice, and needle
valve. Analysis was by reverse-phase HPLC with ultraviolet (UV) detection using Compendium Method
TO-11A modified as detailed in ATC IOP 227 Rev. 3.0 - Analysis of Formaldehyde and Other Carbonyl
Compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
2.12	Hydrocarbons, n-Hexane, and Sulfur Hexafluoride
Hydrocarbon, n-hexane, and SF6 concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the
B2 were determined using the same sample collected for the VOC analysis. Analysis for the light
hydrocarbons was by 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Method 18 -Measurement of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Gas Chromatography. SF6 was analyzed by gas chromatography with electron capture
detection (GC/ECD). This measurement served as a backup for the FTIR measurement of SF6.
2.13	Energetic Materials
Energetic compound concentrations that resulted from the firing of ordnance in the B2 were
determined based on procedures found in EPA Compendium Method TO-13 - Determination of
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Ambient Air Using Gas Chromatography/Mass
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
7

-------
Spectrometry (GC/MS). During each test, samples were collected using a PS-1 sampler equipped with a
quartz fiber particulate filter and XAD-2 adsorbent resin cartridges. The PS-1 sampling module was used
to sample for 30 minutes at approximately 0.1 m3/min. Analyses followed procedures outlined in
USACHPPM, Directorate of Laboratory Sciences, Chromatographic Analysis Division, Procedure for
Analysis of Explosives in Air, Standard Operating Procedure CAD 26.1, May 1998. This method
specifically addresses the analysis of 2,4 Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-Dinitrotoluene, 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene, and
hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine (RDX) by XAD-2 resin sampling, followed by isoamyl acetate
extraction, and GC/ECD analysis.
3.0	TEST DATA ANALYSIS AND RATING
3.1	EPA Guidance Regarding Test Data Quality Ratings
Prior to inclusion of emission factors in AP-42, the reliability of the underlying emission test data
must be appraised in accordance with the rating system specified in Reference 4. Under this rating
system, test data are assigned a rating from A to D, where an "A" rating is assigned to the highest quality
data. The criteria used to assign a specific data quality rating are summarized below.
A Tests are performed by using an EPA reference test method, or when not applicable, a sound
methodology. Tests are reported in enough detail for adequate validation and raw data are
provided that can be used to duplicate the emission results presented in the report.
B Tests are performed by a generally sound methodology, but lacking enough detail for adequate
validation. Data are insufficient to completely duplicate the emission result presented in the
report.
C Tests are based on an unproven or new methodology, or are lacking a significant amount of
background information.
D Tests are based on a generally unacceptable method, but the method may provide an order-of-
magnitude value for the source.
Four specific criteria are identified in Reference 4 for consideration to assist in the assignment of
a test data quality rating. These four criteria are:
1.	Source operation. If the manner in which the source was operated is well documented in the
report and the source was operating within typical parameters during the test, an A rating should
be assigned. If the report stated parameters that were typical, but lacked detailed information, a
"B" rating should be assigned. If there is reason to believe the operation was not typical, a "C" or
"D" rating should be assigned.
2.	Test methods and sampling procedures. In developing the ratings, the estimated accuracy and
precision of the test method as well as the adequacy of the documentation should be considered.
In general, if a current EPA reference test method, appropriate for the source, was followed, the
rating should be higher ("A" or "B"). If other methods were used, an assessment should be made
of their validity. If it is judged that the method was likely to be inaccurate or biased, a lower
rating ("C" or "D") should be given. A complete report should indicate whether any procedures
deviated from standard methods and explain any deviations. If deviations were reported, an
evaluation should be made of whether these were likely to influence the test results.
3.	Process information. During testing, many variations in the process can occur without warning
and sometimes without being noticed. Such variations can induce wide deviations in sampling
results. If a large variation between test run results cannot be explained by information contained
in the site final test report or from test reports of other sources, the data are suspect and should be
8
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
given a lower rating or excluded. However, it should be recognized that a process may have
highly variable emissions and a lower rating may not be appropriate solely on the basis of wide
deviations in sampling results.
4. Analysis and calculations. Ideally, final test reports should contain original raw data sheets and
other documentation such as gas parameters (dry cubic feet per minute, oxygen percentage),
calculation sheets, or example calculations describing how the calculated emission results were
obtained. If there are data sheets, the nomenclature and equations used should be compared to
those specified by EPA to establish equivalency. The depth of review of the calculations should
be dictated by the reviewers' confidence in the ability and conscientiousness of the tester, based
on such factors as consistency of results and completeness of other areas of the final test report.
Reports may indicate that raw data sheets were available, but were not included. If the final test
report is of high quality based on the other criteria, the quality rating should not be lowered due
to a lack of data sheets.
An overall test data quality rating should be assigned based upon the ratings assigned for each of the four
criteria.
3.2 Analysis of Test Data
Data included in the final test report1, the detailed test plan2, and in the analytical data supporting
the test report were rated in accordance with the rating system described above. Results for each of the
four criteria described above are presented in the following sections.
3.2.1	Source Operations
The manner in which the ordnance were fired (i.e., used) is documented in the final test report.
Each ordnance that was tested was fired in a manner similar to that which would occur in the field. The
tests appear to have replicated typical ordnance operating parameters; consequently, the test data should
be assigned an "A" rating based on this criterion.
3.2.2	Test Methods and Sampling Procedures
The test methods and sampling procedures were evaluated as being appropriate and consistent
with EPA test methods or sound methodology. Except as noted below, no problems of any significance
were identified; consequently, the test data should be assigned an "A" rating based on this criterion.
3.2.2.1 CEMS-Measured Data
CEMS raw data were provided for the tests,3 but not for the pre- and post-test quality control
(QC) activities. CEMS QC measures specified under 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, EPA Methods 3A, 7E,
and 6C were not followed. Furthermore, none of the calibration gases certifications were supplied. There
was no evidence of bias in the data; however, based on the issues noted above, the test data for the
CEMS-measured compounds (i.e., CO, C02, NOx, and S02) should be assigned a "B" rating based on this
criterion.
As documented in the Excel spreadsheets prepared by the testing contractor3, the CEMS-
measured CO concentration exceeded the instrumentation sampling range while testing configuration
No. 2. A similar situation occurred for the C02 concentration during test run No. 4. In both instances,
FTIR-measured data were used to develop the CO and C02 emission factors, as appropriate, for the test
runs. However, the FTIR-measured concentrations used to develop the emission factors could not be
duplicated or verified. Furthermore, the FTIR-measured data were only intended to be used to identify
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
9

-------
qualitatively the presence of CO and C02; they were not intended to be used to quantify the
concentrations. Consequently, the test data for both compounds were assigned a "C" rating.
3.2.2.2	Indeno [1,2,3-cd] Pyrene and Dibenz[a,h] Anthracene Data
The analytical methods for indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene and dibenz[a,h] anthracene were
compromised. The case narrative for PAHs/SVOCs3 stated that indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene and dibenz[a,h]
anthracene results were considered estimates with a high bias; consequently, the test data for indeno
[1,2,3-cd] pyrene and dibenz[a,h] anthracene should be assigned a "C" rating based on this criterion.
3.2.2.3	VOC Compound Data
As described in the final test report1, several deficiencies in the analysis of VOCs were noted.
VOC analysis deficiencies included:
1.	A bromofluorobenzene (BFB) tune to evaluate the performance of the mass spectrometer was not
performed.
2.	An initial two-point calibration, instead of the required three-point initial calibration was
performed.
3.	Reporting limits could not be verified by performance data or a detection limit study. The
original detection and reporting limits were estimated based on chromatographic noise levels.
4.	Several analytes were reported below the lowest run standard.
5.	No system blank samples were run before analysis of sample canisters.
6.	Prior and subsequent blank analyses showed low-level analyte contamination.
Because of these deficiencies, the VOC test quality should be assigned a "B" rating.
Furthermore, reporting limits for each compound were increased to eliminate any results reported below
the lowest demonstrated detection limit so that realistic assessment of the VOC emissions could be made.
This decision did not further downgrade the test data quality rating for the VOC analytes; however, some
VOC analytes that were detected at very low levels were eliminated from further consideration.
3.2.2.4	Hydrocarbon Compound Data
Deficiencies in the hydrocarbon compound analysis were also noted during the review of the final
test report.1 These deficiencies are as follows:
1.	According to the test report, 13 hydrocarbons were supposed to be analyzed; however, the
hydrocarbon analysis covered only 7 of these analytes.
2.	Again, no method performance data were supplied to support the reporting limits. Detection
limits were estimated based on chromatographic noise.
3.	A propane standard, rather than a multi component standard, was used to generate response
factors for all analytes.
4.	No duplicate injections or matrix spikes were analyzed.
Because of these deficiencies, the hydrocarbon test data quality should be assigned a "B" rating.
Furthermore, detection limits for each compound were increased from 50 parts per billion (ppb) to
550 ppb. This decision did not further downgrade the test data rating for the hydrocarbon analytes;
however, all but one of the hydrocarbon analytes (methane) were eliminated from further consideration.
10
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
3.2.2.5 Compounds Sampled or Analyzed Using More than One Test Method or Analytical Method
Twenty-nine compounds were either sampled or analyzed using two methods; these compounds
are identified in Table 4. For each of these compounds, emission factors were based upon the data
measured using the more appropriate test or analytical method; data obtained using the less appropriate
method were ignored. The more appropriate method was identified by reviewing the methods and the
target compound lists associated with each method. If a specific compound appeared on the target
compound list for one method but not the other, the method targeting the compound was selected. If a
specific compound appeared on the target compound lists for both methods, the method judged to provide
the most accurate data was selected.
If a compound measurement was obtained using both the SW8270M (SVOCs) and TO-14A
(VOCs) methods, the measurement obtained from the TO-14A method was judged to be more accurate
and was therefore selected. When a compound was measured using both the SW8270M (SVOCs) and
TO-13 (PAHs) methods, the TO-13 value was selected because TO-13 allowed quantification of
compounds at lower levels than SW8270M. For compounds measured using a CEMS and FTIR
spectroscopy, the CEMS measurements were judged to be more accurate. For compounds measured
using both TO-14A and FTIR spectroscopy, measurements from TO-14A were judged to be more
accurate and were selected. For compounds measured using both SW8270M (SVOCs) and SOP CAD
26.1 (energetic materials), the SOP CAD 26.1 data were selected because SOP CAD 26.1 allows
detection of compounds at lower levels than SW8270M.
If a compound sampled under two methods had poor precision between test runs for the sampling
method that would have been more accurate under normal circumstances, data from the other method
were used to calculate emission factors. These cases are also noted in the footnotes for Table 4.
TABLE 4 COMPOUNDS MEASURED USING MORE THAN ONE TEST
OR ANALYTICAL METHOD
Compounds
Selected Method
Other Method Employed
C02a
40 CFR 60 Method 3A (CEMS)
40 CFR 63 (FTIR)
cob
40 CFR 60 Method 10 (CEMS)
40 CFR 63 (FTIR)
Methane
40 CFR 60 Method 18
(Hydrocarbons)
40 CFR 63 (FTIR)
Acenaphthenec
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Acenaphthylene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Anthracene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Benzo(a)anthracene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Benzo(a)pyrene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Chrysene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
11

-------
TABLE 4 (cont.)
Compounds
Selected Method
Other Method Employed
Dibutyl phthalate
SOP CAD 26.1 (Energetics)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
1,2-dichlorobenzene
TO-14A (VOCs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
TO-14A (VOCs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
1,4-dichlorobenzene
TO-14A (VOCs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
2,4-dinitrotoluene
SOP CAD 26.1 (Energetics)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
2,6-dinitrotoluene
SOP CAD 26.1 (Energetics)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Dioctyl phthalate
SOP CAD 26.1 (Energetics)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Fluoranthene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Fluorene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Hexachlorobutadiene
TO-14A (VOCs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Naphthalened
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Nitrobenzene
SOP CAD 26.1 (Energetics)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Phenanthrene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
Pyrene
TO-13 (PAHs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
TO-14A (VOCs)
SW8270M (SVOCs)
a FTIR-measured data were used to develop the C02 emission factors for Configuration No. 4
because CEMS-measured C02 values exceeded the instrumentation measurement range.
b FTIR-measured data were used to develop the CO emission factors for Configuration No. 2
because CEMS-measured CO values exceeded the instrumentation measurement range.
c SW8270M data were used to develop the acenaphthene emission factors for Configuration No. 5
because samples measured using TO-13 had a relative percent difference greater than 100 percent,
indicating poor precision.
d SW8270M data were used to develop the naphthalene emission factors for Configuration Nos. 1, 2,
and 5 because the compound was present in such high concentrations that the TO-13 method
required multiple dilutions. Naphthalene values detected by the SW8270M method were
considered to be more accurate at such dilution levels.
3.2.2.6 Tentatively Identified Compounds
During the analysis of the SVOC data, the 20 highest nontarget "peaks" were tentatively
identified using computerized mass spectral matching techniques. Emission factors were developed for
these tentatively identified compounds (TICs) if all of the following criteria were met.
1.	The TIC corresponded to a unique compound (e.g., ethylbenzene). Emission factors were not
developed if the TIC corresponded to a class of compounds (e.g., unknown alcohol).
2.	The TIC was not identified using another analysis method that provided higher confidence data.
Emission factors were developed based upon the higher confidence analysis method if such data
were available.
12
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
3. The TIC was not present in the method blank. Emission factors were not developed if the TIC
was found in the corresponding method blank.
The number of SVOCs that were tentatively identified as unique compounds varied from a
minimum of four compounds for Configurations No. 3 (M3A1, zone 3, Ml99), No. 4 (M3, zone 3,
M284), and No.5 (M3A1, zone 3, M284) to a maximum of six compounds for Configuration No. 1 (M3,
zone 3, Ml 99). A few of these compounds were also identified using higher confidence methods or were
present in the method blank. Therefore, using the second and third criteria identified above, the number
of emission factors developed for SVOC TICs varied from a minimum of three to a maximum of five for
a given configuration. Because of the uncertainty in the true identity of the SVOC TICs, the test data
were assigned a "C" rating.
As reported in Reference 1, several VOC TICs were measured, but emission factors were only
estimated for two TICs (i.e., acetonitrile and acrylonitrile) due to deficiencies in the VOC analysis. These
emission factors were expressed as a benzene equivalent concentration because of internal standard
deficiencies. Because of the uncertainty in the true identity of the SVOC TICs, these test data were also
assigned a "C" rating.
3.2.3	Process Information
Ordnance are manufactured to tight tolerances and are expected to deploy in a very repeatable
fashion. Consequently, the test data should be assigned an "A" rating based upon this criterion.
However, large relative percent differences (i.e., greater than 100 percent) between two samples within a
test were noted for several compounds during a few of the test runs. Specific instances in which these
differences were noted included the dioxin/furan compounds measured during test runs No. 2 and 4, and
the measurement of sulfuric acid during test run No. 4. The equation below illustrates the calculation of
relative percent difference:
sample 1 concentration - sample 2 concentration
relative percent difference =	x 100%
average of sample 1 and sample 2 concentrations
Due to the large relative percent differences between samples, the test data specifically identified above
were assigned a "C" rating. The remainder of the data should be assigned an "A" rating based on this
criterion.
3.2.4	Analysis and Calculations
The test report1, detailed test plan2, and analytical data supporting the test report3 were reviewed
to determine whether they contained all of the original raw data, other documentation, and example
calculations. Although the test report did not contain raw field data, the data were made available upon
request. The test report also lacked certain calibration data. However, the missing information was
judged insufficient to result in a downgrade of the test data quality rating.
The raw data and sample calculations presented in the final test report, detailed test plan, and
analytical data supporting the test report were reviewed to determine if the emission factors presented in
the report could be duplicated. Where differences were found between the emission factors calculated
using the Excel spreadsheets and those presented in the test report, an examination was made to determine
the reason for the differences. Several minor errors were noted in the calculation of the emission factors
within the test report, particularly with respect to correcting the sample volumes to standard conditions
and the incorporation of analytical detection limits into the emission factors (see Section 4.2 for a
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
13

-------
discussion of the methodology). However, the emission factors presented in AP-42 are based upon the
corrected spreadsheets. Based upon the raw data, other documentation, and the Excel spreadsheet
calculations, the test data should be assigned an "A" rating.
Emission factors developed for compounds present in the method blank at levels of 20 to
50 percent of test values were assumed to be biased high. One compound, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCDF, met this
criterion for Configurations No. 2 and 5. For this compound, the test data should be assigned a "B"
rating.
When compounds were found in the method blank at levels greater than 50 percent of test values,
the data were assumed to be suspect and no emission factors were developed. One compound,
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF, met this criterion for all five configurations.
3.3 Test Data Quality Ratings
Upon completing the analysis described in the preceding section of this document, the test data
quality ratings assigned as a result of the four criteria were reviewed. This review led to a downgrading
of some of the test data from an "A" rating to either a "B" rating or a "C" rating. Table 5 identifies the
data quality ratings for all compounds that did not receive an "A" rating.
TABLE 5 DOWNGRADED DATA QUALITY RATINGS
Compound or Class of Compounds
Data Quality
Rating
Applicable Configuration
Carbon dioxide
B
Configurations 1, 2, 3, and 5
Carbon dioxide
C
Configuration 4
Carbon monoxide
B
Configurations 1, 3, 4, and 5
Carbon monoxide
C
Configuration 2
Oxides of nitrogen
B
All configurations
Sulfur dioxide
B
All configurations
VOCs
B
All configurations
Hydrocarbon compounds
B
All configurations
Acetonitrile
C
All configurations
Acrylonitrile
C
All configurations
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene
C
All configurations
2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanol
C
Configuration 1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
C
Configuration 2
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
C
Configuration 2
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
B
Configuration 5
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
C
Configuration 2
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
C
Configuration 2
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
C
Configurations 2 and 4
14
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE 5 (cont)
Compound or Class of Compounds
Data Quality
Rating
Applicable Configuration
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
C
Configuration 2
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyrene
C
All configurations
Octabenzone
c
All configurations
1,2,3,7,8 -Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
c
Configuration 2
1,2,3,7,8 -Pentachlorodibenzofuran
c
Configuration 2
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
c
Configurations 2 and 4
Sulfuric acid
c
Configuration 4
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
c
Configuration 2
2,3,7,8 -T etrachlorodibenzofiiran
c
Configuration 2
Benzaldehyde, 4-ethyl
c
Configurations 3 and 5
Benzoic Acid
c
Configuration 1
Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
c
Configuration 1
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl
c
Configurations 2, 3, 4, and 5
Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl
c
Configuration 3
Octasulfur
c
Configuration 4
Sulfur
c
Configurations 1, 2, and 3
4.0 EMISSION FACTOR CALCULATIONS
The methodologies and procedures that were used to develop emission factors from the test data
are described in this section. A similar approach was used to calculate emission factors for TSP, PM-10,
PM-2.5, metals, SVOCs, PAHs, and energetic materials. The calculation steps that were performed for
each sample and each configuration are summarized below.
1.	The sample volumes associated with the background and test runs were corrected to the EPA
Stationary Source Program standard temperature and pressure (i.e, 68ฐF and 29.92 inches of
mercury).
2.	For compounds for which more than one test sample was obtained, analytical detection limits
were incorporated into the test data.
3.	The background compound concentration was calculated by dividing the mass of compound
detected during the background run by the background run sample volume corrected to standard
conditions. Background testing was conducted on several days. When more than one set of
background data was available, background compound concentrations were averaged to provide
one background concentration for each compound under each test method. Analytical detection
limits were incorporated into the background data during averaging.
4.	The test compound concentration was calculated by dividing the mass of compound detected
during the test run by the test run sample volume corrected to standard conditions.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
15

-------
5.	A background-corrected concentration was calculated by subtracting the background
concentration from the test concentration.
6.	A dilution-corrected concentration was calculated by dividing the background-corrected
concentration by the test's dilution correction factor.
7.	The mass of compound released during the test run was calculated by multiplying the dilution-
corrected concentration by the volume of the B2.
8.	Emission factors for each sample and test run were calculated by dividing the mass of compound
released by the number of ordnance detonated during the test run or by the NEW detonated
during the test run, as appropriate.
9.	Average emission factors were calculated for each compound.
Because concentration data (i.e., milligrams per cubic meter [mg/m3], parts per million by volume
[ppmv], or parts per billion by volume [ppbv]) were recorded for VOCs, hydrocarbons, FTIR-, and
CEMS-measured compounds, it was not necessary to calculate a corrected sample volume as described in
step 1 or to calculate background and test concentrations as described in steps 3 and 4. Detection limits
were applied directly to test compound concentrations of VOCs, hydrocarbons, and FTIR-, and CEMS-
measured compounds, as described in step 2. Where present, ppmv and ppbv values were converted to
mg/m3.
Background run concentrations for VOCs and hydrocarbons were averaged, incorporating
analytical detection limits. Emission factors for VOCs and hydrocarbons were then estimated in
accordance with steps 5 through 9 described above.
FTIR- and CEMS-measured compounds were estimated in accordance with steps 5 through 9
described above, except that step 6, the dilution correction, was not required. FTIR- and
CEMS-measured concentrations were determined from initial steady-state points that occurred prior to
significant dilution.
Test and background concentrations of acid gases, hydrogen cyanide, aldehydes, and dioxin/furan
compounds were provided by the laboratory. The laboratory corrected volumes to conditions that
differed from EPA Stationary Source Program standard conditions. Concentration data received from the
lab were corrected for volume at Stationary Source Program standard conditions and analytical detection
limits were incorporated as described in step 2.
After correcting the background run concentrations for acid gases, hydrogen cyanide, aldehydes,
and dioxin/furan compounds to standard conditions, the values were averaged, incorporating analytical
detection limits, to provide one background concentration for each compound sampled under each
method. Emission factors for acid gases, cyanide, aldehyde, and dioxin/furan compounds were then
estimated in accordance with steps 5 through 9 described above.
The following sections describe the emission factor calculation steps in more detail. Sections 4.1
through 4.9 discuss the calculations involved with the completion of the nine basic steps listed above.
Section 4.10 discusses the calculation of average emission factors across all of the configurations tested.
4.1 Correction of Sample Volume to Stationary Source Program Standard Conditions
Because sample volumes were initially reported at actual conditions, calculations to correct the
sample volumes to the EPA Stationary Source Program standard temperature of 68ฐF and pressure of
29.92 inches of Hg (20ฐC and 760 mm Hg) were performed. To obtain the sample volume at EPA
16
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
Stationary Source Program standard conditions (Vstat), the sample volume at actual conditions (Vact) was
multiplied by the ratio of pressure at actual conditions (Pact) to temperature at actual conditions (Tact) and
by the ratio of temperature at Stationary Source Program standard conditions (Tstat) to pressure at
Stationary Source Program standard conditions (Pstat). This calculation is illustrated by the following
equation:
Pact Tstat
Vstat — Vact X 	 X 	
Tact P stat
4.2	Incorporation of Analytical Detection Limits to the Test Data
In most cases, more than one test sample was obtained for a specific compound (i.e., more than
one sampling train was used per test). When multiple samples were obtained for the same compound, a
comparison was made of all the sample data collected. Based upon the results of the comparison, the
following adjustments were made to the test data:
1.	If all of the samples indicated that a compound was "not detected," the sample data were not
adjusted.
2.	If all of the samples indicated that a compound was detected, the sample data were not adjusted.
3.	If one or more of the samples indicated that a compound was detected and one or more of the
samples indicated that a compound was not detected, the "not detected" values were replaced
with a value equal to one half of the compound's analytical detection limit. The assumption
inherent to this adjustment was that the measured presence of a compound in one or more
samples was indicative of the compound's presence in all samples. The analytical detection
limits for each sample were obtained from the analytical data supporting the test report.
4.3	Determination of Background Concentration
For TSP, metals, SVOCs, and PAHs, the background compound concentration (BC) was
calculated by dividing the mass of compound detected during the background run (Bkgd mass) by the
background run sample volume corrected to EPA Stationary Source Program standard conditions
(Bkgd Vstat). This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
Bkgd mass
BC —	
Bkงd Vstat
The background compound concentrations of acid gases, hydrogen cyanide, and aldehydes
provided by the lab were calculated using the sample volume at actual conditions (Vact). In order to
correct the concentrations to EPA Stationary Source Program standard conditions (Vstat), the uncorrected
concentrations (UC) were multiplied by the ratio of volume at actual conditions to volume at standard
conditions. This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
BC = UCx —
v
stat
The background compound concentrations of dioxin/furan compounds provided by the lab were
calculated using a sample volume at non standard conditions. In order to correct the concentrations to
Stationary Source Program standard conditions, the uncorrected concentrations were multiplied by the
ratio of volume at non standard conditions (Vamb) to volume at EPA Stationary Source Program standard
conditions (Vstat). This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
BC = UC x
V
stat
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
17

-------
From one to three background runs were conducted for each class of compounds. Table 6
identifies and describes each background run that was conducted as well as the manner by which
composite data were obtained. When more than one background run was conducted per test method, the
background compound concentrations were averaged, incorporating analytical detection limits, as
described in Section 4.2.
TABLE 6 BACKGROUND RUN INFORMATION
Compound(s)
Background Run(s) Conducted
Date(s) Conducted
Composite Data Used
VOCs/
Hydrocarbons
Two 24-hr runs
5/13/99, 6/8/99
Average
Dioxins/Furans
Two 24-hr runs
5/13/99, 6/7/99
Average
Metals
Two 24-hr runs
5/13/99, 6/7/99
Average
Acid Gases
Two 30-min runs
5/17/99, 6/1/99
Data from 5/17/99 for
Configurations 1-3
Data from 6/1/99 for
Configurations 4, 5
Hydrogen Cyanide
Two 30-min runs
5/17/99, 6/1/99
Average
Particulate Matter
Three 24-hr runs
4/26/99, 5/13/99,
6/7/99
Average
Aldehydes
Two 30-min runs
5/17/99, 6/1/99
Average
Energetic Materials
Two 90-min runs
5/13/99, 6/7/99
Average
SVOCs/PAHs
One 24-hr run, two 30-min
pretest runs
5/13/99, 6/1/99,
6/7/99
Data from 5/13/99 for
Configurations 1-3
Data from 6/1/99 for
Configuration 4
Data from 6/7/99 for
Configuration 5
FTIR- and CEMS-measured compounds were not sampled for during the background runs.
However, background data were recorded for each test run between the time the FTIR and CEMS began
sampling and the time of detonation. The only FTIR- or CEMS-measured compound for which
significant background concentrations were recorded was C02. The C02 background concentration was
assumed to equal a representative value over the sampling period. Background concentrations for the
other FTIR- and CEMS-measured compounds were assumed to be zero.
4.4 Determination of Test Compound Concentration
For TSP, PM-10, PM-2.5, metals, SVOCs, PAHs, and energetic materials, the test compound
concentration (TC) was calculated by dividing the mass of compound detected during the test run (Test
mass) by the test run sample volume corrected to EPA Stationary Source Program standard conditions
(Test Vstat)• This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
, , Test mass
TC =	
18
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
Test compound concentrations of acid gases, hydrogen cyanide, and aldehydes provided by the
lab were calculated using the sample volume at actual conditions. In order to correct the concentrations to
EPA Stationary Source Program standard conditions, the uncorrected concentrations (UC) were
multiplied by the ratio of the volume at actual conditions (Vact) to the volume at EPA Stationary Source
Program standard conditions (Vstat). This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
TC = UC x
V
stat
Test compound concentrations of dioxin/furan compounds provided by the lab were calculated
using the sample volume at non standard conditions. In order to correct the concentrations to Stationary
Source Program standard conditions, the uncorrected concentrations were multiplied by the ratio of the
volume at non standard conditions (Vamb) to the volume at Stationary Source Program standard conditions
(Vstat). This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
TC = UC x
V
stat
For VOCs, hydrocarbons, FTIR- and CEMS-measured compounds, sample volume correction
was not required. VOC and hydrocarbon test concentration values were used directly. Test
concentrations of CEMS- and FTIR-measured compounds were determined based upon the initial
steady-state values reached after detonation. The time at which a compound's concentration reached an
initial steady state was determined by visually inspecting plots of the concentration data versus time. The
initial steady state corresponds to the time at which a compound was well mixed within the B2, but before
the compound's concentration began to decrease at a steady rate due to dilution.
4.5 Determination of Background-Corrected Concentration
For all compounds, the calculation of the background-corrected concentration (BCC) was
dependent on whether the background (BC) and test concentrations (TC) were detected and whether they
were less than, equal to, or greater than one another. The procedures used to calculate the
background-corrected concentration for each sampling train and compound are described below and are
displayed graphically in Figure 1.
1.	If the test concentration was not detected (ND), the background-corrected concentration equaled
ND.
2.	If the test concentration was detected and the background concentration was not detected, the
background-corrected concentration equaled the test concentration.
3.	If the test and background concentrations were detected and the test concentration was less than
or equal to the background concentration, the background-corrected concentration equaled 0.
4.	If the test and background concentrations were detected and the background concentration was
less than the test concentration, the background concentration was subtracted from the test
concentration. This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
BCC = TC -BC
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
19

-------
No
Was TC Detected?
Yes
No
Was BC Detected?
Yes
No
Was TC > BC?
Yes
BCC = TC
BCC = TC - BC
BCC = ND
BCC = 0
TC = Test Concentration
BC = Background Concentration
ND = Not Detected
BCC = Background-Corrected
Concentration
Figure 1 Calculation of background-corrected concentration.
20
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
4.6	Determination of Dilution-Corrected Concentration
The dilution-corrected concentration (DCC) was calculated by dividing the background-corrected
concentration by the applicable dilution correction factor (DCF). This calculation is illustrated by the
following equation:
DCC^
DCF
With the exception of CEMS- and FTIR-measured compounds, dilution correction factors were
obtained from the test contractor.3 Because the test concentrations of CEMS- and FTIR-measured
compounds were obtained prior to dilution, it was not necessary to calculate a dilution corrected
concentration for these compounds.
4.7	Determination of Mass of Compound Released
The mass of compound released was calculated by multiplying the dilution-corrected
concentration by the volume of the B2. This calculation is illustrated by the following equation:
Mass compound released = DCC x B2 volume
4.8	Determination of Emission Factors
Once the mass of compound released was calculated, two emission factors were developed for
each sample and for each test run: the mass of compound released per item (i.e., per single ordnance) and
the mass of compound released per pound NEW. The NEW for all ordnance were determined from
Reference 1.
4.9	Determination of Average Emission Factors for Each Configuration
Steps 1 through 8, as described in Sections 4.1 through 4.8, are applicable to individual samples
within individual test runs. The next step in the emission factor calculation process was to calculate
average emission factors for each compound in terms of mass released per item and mass released per
pound NEW. The average emission factors for each compound were calculated as the arithmetic mean of
the individual samples associated with the compound. If all samples indicated that the compound was not
detected (ND), then the average emission factor was assigned a value of ND. [Note: The minimum
detection levels associated with the compounds that were not detected are presented in Appendix A.]
Total dioxin/furan emission factors were calculated by summing the average emission factors for all
dioxin/furan compounds.
4.10	Determination of Average Emission Factors Across Configurations
As previously described, a total of five tactical configurations were tested to address emission
product variation as a function of propelling charge, charge size (zone), and cannon type. Results from
the test program indicate that the type of cannon used affects the particulate and metals emissions
distributions. The test program results also indicate that there are no consistent emission factor
differences between the M3 and M3A1 propelling charges and that, on an NEW basis, there are only
subtle emission factor differences between the zone 3 and zone 5 charges.
Because the emission factor differences across configurations were minor and because the user
community may not have access to data regarding the type of cannon or the type of propelling charge
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
21

-------
used in the field, average emission factors were developed across all configurations tested. Because the
charge size affects the magnitude of emissions produced, the average emission factors were only
determined in terms of pounds per pound NEW.
The average emission factor for each compound was determined as the arithmetic mean of the
individual emission factors associated with each configuration. If all of the emission factors were "ND,"
then the average emission factor was assigned a value of ND. If a compound was assigned a value of ND
for some but not all configurations, then the ND values were replaced with a value equal to one half of the
compound's analytical detection limit prior to calculating the arithmetic average emission factor across
configurations.
Average emission factors for tentatively identified compounds were determined in a slightly
different manner. Analytical detection limits were not available for all TICs. In addition, different TICs
were identified for different configurations. Therefore, for the configurations in which a specific TIC was
not detected, an emission factor value of zero was assigned prior to calculating the arithmetic average
emission factor across configurations.
5.0 EMISSION FACTOR RATINGS
The emission factors were appraised in accordance with the rating system specified in
Reference 4. Under this rating system, emission factors are assigned a rating from A to E, where an "A"
rating is assigned to the highest quality factors. The criteria used to assign a specific emission factor
rating are summarized below.
A Excellent. The emission factor was developed primarily from A- and B-rated source test data
taken from many randomly chosen facilities in the industry population. The source category
population was sufficiently specific to minimize variability.
B Above average. The emission factor was developed primarily from A- or B-rated test data from a
moderate number of facilities. Although no specific bias was evident, it was not clear if the
facilities tested represented a random sample of the industry. As with the "A" rating, the source
category population was sufficiently specific to minimize variability.
C Average. The emission factor was developed primarily from A-, B-, and/or C-rated test data from
a reasonable number of facilities. Although no specific bias was evident, it was not clear if the
facilities tested represented a random sample of the industry. As with the "A" rating, the source
category population was sufficiently specific to minimize variability.
D Below average. The emission factor was developed primarily from A-, B-, and C-rated test data
from a small number of facilities, and there may have been reason to suspect that these facilities
did not represent a random sample of the industry. There also may have been evidence of
variability within the source category population.
E Poor. The emission factor was developed from C- and D-rated test data from a very limited
number of facilities, and there may have been reason to suspect that the facilities tested did not
represent a random sample of the industry. There also may have been evidence of variability
within the source category population.
Two analyses were conducted to assign ratings to the ordnance emission factors. First, an
analysis was conducted on an ordnance-specific basis. Second, an analysis was conducted using all
available ordnance emission factor data. The second analysis was conducted to determine whether a
sufficient correlation existed between emission factors for different but similar ordnance to allow the
22
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
number of test data points to be increased to the point that higher emission factor ratings could be
assigned than were possible when using the ordnance-specific approach. Both analyses are described
below.
5.1	Emission Factor Ratings Assigned - Based on Ordnance-Specific Test Data
As previously described, emission factor ratings are dependent upon the test data quality, the
number of test data points, the amount of variability present within a source category population, and the
randomness of the source category sample. The following test data facts pertain to these rating criteria:
1.	As described in Section 3 of this Background Document, the ordnance test data was primarily
rated A or B. The test data for a few compounds was rated C.
2.	Only two tests were conducted per ordnance.
3.	Ordnance are manufactured to very tight tolerance levels so there is little variability within a
specific type of ordnance.
4.	There was no evidence that suggested the tested items within each type of ordnance were
specially selected.
Emission factor ratings were assigned based upon these facts. The rationale used to accept or
reject specific emission factor ratings follow.
A: Rejected. The number of test data points was deemed to be insufficient to assign an A emission
factor rating.
B: Rejected. The number of test data points was deemed to be insufficient to assign a B emission
factor rating.
C: Accepted for most ordnance. The emission factors were developed using A- and B-rated test
data, there is little variability among items, and there was no evidence that suggested the tested
items were specially selected. Because of the limited number of data points, a C rating was
deemed appropriate for this set of circumstances.
D: Accepted for some ordnance. The emission factors were developed using C-rated test data, there
is little variability among items, and there was no evidence that suggested the tested items were
specially selected. Because of the limited number of data points, a D rating was deemed
appropriate for this set of circumstances.
E: Rejected. The ordnance described in this report were developed primarily using A- and B-rated
test data rather than C- or D-rated data, there is little variability among items, and there was no
evidence that suggested the tested items were specially selected. Therefore, an E emission factor
rating was deemed inappropriate.
5.2	Emission Factor Ratings Assigned - Based on All Available Test Data
The proceeding sections of this Background Document concern the emission measurement
methods, data analysis, and calculations used to develop emission factors for specific ordnance.
However, USAEC's ordnance emission factor development program includes more than 200 ordnance
that have been tested under more than 25 separate test series. Because many of these ordnance are similar
in size and/or chemical composition, a statistical analysis was conducted to assess the similarity of the
emission factors developed for similar ordnance. The results of this analysis were used to reevaluate the
emission factor ratings assigned on an ordnance-specific basis.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
23

-------
USAEC characterized individual ordnance as falling into one of 17 separate categories,
depending upon the size and/or chemical composition of the ordnance. The ordnance and their respective
categories are identified in Table 7 along with a comment field describing the number of data points.
TABLE 7 ORDNANCE CATEGORIZATION FOR EMISSION FACTOR
CORRELATION ASSESSMENT
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment
CS
G963a
K765a
M73A CS Riot Control Agent Hand
Grenade
CS Riot Control Agent Capsule
DPG VI
DPG VI
Data not yet
available

G900
TH3 AN-M14 Incendiary Grenade
E05


G911
MK3A2 Offensive Hand Grenade
E02


G911
MK3A2 Offensive Hand Grenade
E06


K010
M4 Field Incendiary Burster
E05


K145
M18A1 Antipersonnel Mine
E02


M023
Ml 12 Demolition Block Charge
EOl


M030
1/4-Pound Demolition Block Charge
EOl


M030
1/4-Pound Demolition Block Charge
E03


M031
1/2-Pound Demolition Block Charge
DPG IV A


M032
1-Pound Demolition Block Charge
E02


M032
1-Pound Demolition Block Charge
E03


M130a
M6 Electric Blasting Cap
DPG VII

Demolition
M130a
M6 Electric Blasting Cap
E07
20+ data points

M131a
M7 Blasting Cap
E07


M241
M10 High Explosive Universal Destructor
DPG IVB


M456
PETN Type 1 Detonating Cord
DPG IV A


M500a
M21 REEF Line Cutter
FP10


M591
Ml Military Dynamite Demolition Block
Charge
EOl


M913
M58A3 Linear Demolition Charge
E03


ML05a
MK24 High Explosive Cutter
EOll


ML09
Linear Demolition Charge, Shaped 20 gr/ft
DPG IV A


ML15
Linear Demolition Charge, Shaped
225 gr/ft
DPG IV A


ML47a
Mil Blasting Cap
E07


MM50a
M221 Shaped Charge
EOll

24
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

MN02a
M12 Blasting Cap
E07


MN03a
M13 Blasting Cap
E07


MN06a
M14 Blasting Cap
E07

Demolition,
continued
MN07a
MN08a
M15 Delay Blasting Cap
M81 Igniter
EOll
E09
20+ data points

MN68a
M151 Booster Demolition Charge
DPG VIII


None
PAX-11, Granular Powder Burn
E04


None
PAX-11, Molded Pellet Detonation
E04


G878a
M228 Practice Hand Grenade Fuse
DPG VI


K051
M604 Anti-Tank Practice Mine Fuze
E06


N278a
M564 MTSQ Fuze
EOll

Fuze
N285a
N286a
M577 Fuze
M582 Fuze
E09
E07
<10 data points

N335
M557 Point Detonating Fuze
E05


N340
M739A1 Point Detonating Fuze
E05


N464a
M732 Fuze
E09


G881
M67 Fragmentation Grenade
EOl

Grenade
G978
G982
M82 Smoke Simulant Screening Grenade
Launcher
Terephthalic Acid Smoke Hand Grenade
DPG V
DPG V
<10 data points

GG09a
M84 Non-Lethal Stun Hand Grenade
E012


B535
M583A1 40-mm White Star Parachute
Cartridge
DPG IVB


B536
M585 40-mm White Star Cluster Cartridge
DPG IVB


B627
M83A3, M83A2, & M83A1 60-mm
Illuminating Cartridge with Fuze
DPG V

Illumination
D505
M485A2 155-mm Illumination Round
(projectile)
DPG I
20+ data points

L305
Ml95 Green Star Parachute Signal Flare
DPG I


L306
M158 Red Star Cluster Signal Illumination
DPG II


L307
Ml59 White Star Cluster Signal
Illumination
DPG II


L311
M126A1 Red Star Parachute Signal Flare
DPG II

7/06
Ordnance Detonation
25

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

L312
M127A1 White Star Parachute Signal
Flare
DPGI

Illumination,
continued
L314
L367a
M125A1 Green Star Cluster Signal Flare
M22 Anti-Tank, Guided Missile, and
DPGI
DPG VI
20+ data points

Rocket Launching Simulator


L410a
M206 Aircraft Countermeasure Flare
DPG VI

Inert
HAlla
Rocket, 2.75-inch Flechette with M255A1
Warhead
DPG VIII
Data not yet
available

C511
M490 105-mm Target Practice Tracer
Cartridge (tracer)
E06

Large
C784a
M831 120-mm Target Practice Tracer
Cartridge
E012
Only 1 data point
yet available

C785a
M865 120-mm Target Practice Discarding
Sabot Tracer Cartridge
E012

Medium
bait
BA15a
Ml001 40-mm HVCC Cartridge
M769 60-mm FRP Cartridge
E012
E012
Data not yet
available

A652
M220 20-mm TP-T Cartridge
FP9


A940
M910 25-mm Target Practice Discarding
Sabot Tracer Cartridge
FP8

Medium-FP
A976
B129a
M793 25-mm Target Practice Tracer
Cartridge
M789 30 mm CTG
FP8
E09
10+ data points

B519
M781 40-mm Practice Cartridge
FP2


B584
M918 40-mm Practice Cartridge
FP2


B505a
M662 40-mm Red Star Parachute
DPG VIII


Cartridge

Mine
K042a
M88 Volcano Practice Canister Mine
DPG VIII
Data not yet
available
Mortar
CA03
XM929 120 mm Smoke Cartridge with
M7334A1 Fuze
DPG V
Only 1 data point

B542
M430 40-mm High Explosive Dual
Purpose (HEDP) Cartridge (projectile)
E03

Projectile
B571
M383 40-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(projectile)
E03
10+ data points

B632
M49A4 60-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(projectile)
E03

26
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

B642
M720 60-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(projectile)
E06


BZ-133
M888 60-mm Cartridge with M935 PD
Fuze
EOll

Projectile,
continued
C995
H557
M136 AT4 Recoilless Rifle, 84-mm
Cartridge (projectile)
M72A3 66-mm High Explosive Antitank
Rocket (warhead)
E03
EOl
10+ data points

H708a
M73 3 5-mm Subcaliber Practice Rocket
DPG VIII


None3
PAX-21, 60-mm Mortar
E08


PJ02
FIM-92A Stinger-Basic Guided Missile
(warhead)
E06


B642
M720 60-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(propelling charge)
FP4


B653a
M766 60-mm Short Range Practice Mortar
Cartridge
FP10


C226
M301A3 81-mm Illuminating Cartridge
(propelling charge)
FP4


C379
M934 120-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(Zone 1 - propelling charge)
FP8


C511
M490 105-mm Target Practice Tracer
Cartridge (propelling charge)
FP5


C784
M831 120-mm Target Practice Tracer
Cartridge (propelling charge)
FP5

Propellant
C785
M865 120-mm Target Practice Discarding
Sabot Tracer Cartridge (propelling charge)
FP5
20+ data points

C868
M821 81-mm High Explosive Cartridge
(propelling charge)
FP4


C876
M880 81-mm Target Practice Short Range
Cartridge (propelling charge)
FP4


CA09
M931 120-mm Full Range Practice
Cartridge (Zone 1 - propelling charge)
FP8


CA09
M931 120-mm Full Range Practice
Cartridge (Zone 4 - propelling charge)
FP8


D533
M119A2 155-mm Propelling Charge
(Zone 7)
FP5


D540
M3 155-mm Propelling Charge (Zone 3,
Ml99 Cannon)
FP1

7/06
Ordnance Detonation
27

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

D540
M3 155-mm Propelling Charge (Zone 3,
Ml99 Cannon)
FP5


D540
M3 155-mm Propelling Charge (Zone 3,
M284 Cannon)
FP1


D540
M3 155-mm Propelling Charge (Zone 5,
Ml99 Cannon)
FP1


D540
M3A1 155-mm Propelling Charge
(Zone 3, Ml99 Cannon)
FP1


D540
M3A1 155-mm Propelling Charge
(Zone 3, M284 Cannon)
FP1

Propellant,
continued
D541
M4A2 155-mm Propelling Charge
(Zone 7)
FP5
20+ data points

H557
M72A3 66-mm High Explosive Antitank
Rocket (propelling rocket)
FP7


M174a
MK209 Impulse Cartridge
FP10


M842a
Ml Squib
E07


M842a
M79 Igniter
E09


MD73a
M796 Impulse Cartridge
FP10


PJ02
FIM-92A Stinger-Basic Guided Missile
(flight motor)
FP7


PJ02
FIM-92A Stinger-Basic Guided Missile
(launch motor)
E05


H975a
M274 2.75-inch Signature Smoke with
H872 Warhead
DPG VIII


L366
M74A1 Projectile Air Burst Simulator
DPGIVB


L495
M49A1 Surface Trip Flare
DPG II


L508a
M72 Red Railroad Warning Fuse
DPG VI


L592
TOW Blast Simulator
DPG V

Pyrotechnic
L594
M115A2 Ground Burst Simulator
DPG I
10+ data points

L595a
M9 Liquid Projectile Air Burst Simulator
E012


L596
Ml 10 Flash Artillery Simulator
DPG I


L598
Ml 17 Flash Booby Trap Simulator
DPG I


L599
Ml 18 Illuminating Booby Trap Simulator
DPG II


L600
Ml 19 Whistling Booby Trap Simulator
DPG II


L601
M116A1 Hand Grenade Simulator
DPG I

28

Ordnance Detonation

7/06

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

L602
M21 Artillery Flash Simulator
DPGIVB


L709
M25 Target Hit Simulator
E02


L709
XM25 Target Hit Simulator
DPG V


L720
M26 Target Kill Simulator
E06


M327a
Coupling Base Firing Device
FP10


M448a
M2 Percussion Detonator
EOll

Pyrotechnic,
continued
M626a
Ml Push Igniter
E09
10+ data points

M627a
M5 Pressure Release Igniter
FP10


M630
Ml Pull Igniter
DPG V


M630a
Ml Pull Igniter
E09


M670a
M700 Blasting Fuse
EOll


M766a
M60 Igniter
E09


ML03a
Ml42 Firing Device
EOll


H459
Rocket, 2.75-inch Flechette, MK40 Mod 3
FP7


Motor (propelling rocket)


H557
M72A3 66-mm High Explosive Antitank
FP4


Rocket (propelling rocket)

Rocket/Missile
H708
M73 3 5-mm Subcaliber Practice Rocket
FP9
<10 data points

Motor
Rocket, 2.75-inch M267 Practice


H974
Warhead, MK66 Mod 3 Motor (propelling
rocket)
FP7


A010
M220 10 Gage Blank/Subcaliber Salute
Cartridge
FP9


AO 11
12 Gage #00 Shot Cartridge
FP9


A017a
12 Gage #9 Shot Cartridge
FP10


A059
M855 5.56-mm Ball Cartridge (fired from
FP3


the M16A1 Rifle)

Small Arm-FP
A059
M855 5.56-mm Ball Cartridge (fired from
FP3
20+ data points

the M16A2 Rifle)

A059
M855 5.56-mm Ball Cartridge (No-Lead)
FP4


A063
M856 5.56-mm Tracer Cartridge
FP3


A065
M862 5.56-mm Practice Ball Cartridge
FP3


A066
M193 5.56-mm Ball Cartridge
FP6


A068
M196 5.56-mm Tracer Cartridge
FP6

7/06
Ordnance Detonation
29

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

A080
M200 5.56-mm Blank Cartridge
FP3


A086
.22 Caliber Long Rifle Ball Cartridge
FP4


A106
.22 Caliber Standard Velocity Long Rifle
Ball Cartridge
FP4


Alll
M82 7.62-mm Blank Cartridge
FP3


A131
M62 7.62-mm Tracer Cartridge
FP6


A136
Ml 18 7.62-mm Ball Match Cartridge
FP6


A143
M80 7.62-mm Ball Cartridge
FP3


A171
M852 7.62-mm Ball Match Cartridge
FP6


A182
Ml .30 Caliber Ball Cartridge
FP6


A212
M2 .30 Caliber Ball Cartridge
FP6


A218
M25 .30 Caliber Tracer Cartridge
FP9

Small Arm-FP,
continued
A247
A363
M72 .30 Caliber Ball Match Cartridge
M882 9-mm Ball Cartridge
FP6
FP3
20+ data points

A365
Ml81 14.5-mm Trainer-Spotter Cartridge
with 3-sec Delay (Artillery)
DPGV


A366a
M182 14.5-mm Cartridge
EOll


A400
M41 .38 Caliber Special Ball Cartridge
FP9


A403
.38 Caliber Special Blank Cartridge
FP9


A475
M1911 .45 Caliber Ball Cartridge
FP3


A518
M903 .50 Caliber SLAP Cartridge
FP9


A518a
M962 .50 Caliber SLAP/T
FP10


A525
M2 .50 Caliber Armor Piercing Cartridge
FP8


A557
M17 .50 Caliber Tracer Cartridge
FP3


A557
M33 .50 Caliber Ball Cartridge
FP3


A598
M1A1 .50 Caliber Blank Cartridge
FP3


C870a
M819 (IUK) 81-mm Red Phosphorous
Smoke
DPG VII

Smoke
G815a
Red Phosphorous Smoke Screening
Grenade Launcher (UK)
DPG VII
10+ data points

G930
Hexachloroethane Smoke Grenade
DPGV


G940
Ml8 Green Smoke Hand Grenade
DPG III


G945
Ml8 Yellow Smoke Hand Grenade
DPG III

30
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE 7 (cont.)
Category
DODIC
Ordnance Description
Test
Series
Comment

G950
M18 Red Smoke Hand Grenade
DPG III


G950
Ml8 Red Smoke Hand Grenade (new
formulation)
DPGV

Smoke,
continued
G955
G955
M18 Violet Smoke Hand Grenade
Ml8 Violet Smoke Hand Grenade (new
formulation)
DPG III
DPGV
10+ data points

K866a
ABC-M5 HC Ground Smoke Pot (MILES)
DPG VII


K867a
M4A2 Floating Smoke Pot
DPG VII

a Although testing may have been completed, emission factors for this ordnance have not yet been
analyzed for inclusion in AP-42; therefore, these data were not included when the data correlation was
assessed.
Within each of the 17 ordnance categories identified by USAEC, emission factors for each
compound were compared. To allow the comparison of emission factors for ordnance with similar
constituents but significant differences in net explosive weight, the comparison was made using the
normalized emission factor units of mass of compound released per pound NEW. Based upon
information provided by EPA,8 the following procedures were used to assess the data correlation:
1.	The relative standard deviation, defined as the standard deviation divided by the mean, was
calculated for each compound within each ordnance category.
2.	If the relative standard deviation was less than 1.0, the evaluated emission factors were
considered to demonstrate good correlation. As such, the rating for these emission factors could
be elevated to a maximum of an A, depending on the number of data points within the evaluated
ordnance category.
3.	If the relative standard deviation was between 1.0 and 2.0, the evaluated emission factors were
considered to demonstrate fair correlation. As such, the rating for these emission factors could be
elevated to a maximum of a B, depending on the number of data points within the evaluated
ordnance category.
4.	If the relative standard deviation was greater than 2.0, the evaluated emission factors were
considered to demonstrate poor correlation. As such, the emission factor rating could not be
elevated, regardless of the amount of data available.
A poor correlation between emission factors was not necessarily construed as being indicative of poor test
data. Rather, a poor correlation was more likely to indicate that the ordnance included in the category
were not as similar in nature as anticipated by USAEC when the ordnance categories were defined.
In addition to assessing the data correlation, an assessment was made of the number of test data
points available within each of the 17 ordnance categories. Because each ordnance test consisted of two
test data points (i.e., two test runs per ordnance or two independent sampling trains were used during an
ordnance test), the number of test data points available in each of the ordnance categories varied from 2 to
68. Based upon information provided by EPA,8 the following assumptions were used to assess whether
sufficient category-specific test data points were available to justify elevating the emission factor ratings
based on ordnance-specific data only:
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
31

-------
1.	If 20 or more data points were available, the emission factor rating could be elevated to a
maximum of an A, provided that the data also demonstrated a good correlation.
2.	If at least 10 but less than 20 data points were available, the emission factor rating could be
elevated to a maximum of a B, provided that the data also demonstrated a good correlation.
3.	If less than 10 data points were available, the emission factor rating could not be elevated,
regardless of the data correlation.
4.	If the data demonstrated a fair correlation and 20 or more data points were available, the emission
factor rating could be elevated to a maximum of a B.
5.	If the data demonstrated a fair correlation and at least 10 but less than 20 data points were
available, the emission factor rating could be elevated to a maximum of a C.
Using the criteria specified above, the emission factor ratings assigned to ordnance in each of the
17 ordnance categories were reevaluated. This evaluation indicated that some of the emission factor
ratings associated with ordnance included in eight categories could be elevated from a C or D rating to an
A or B rating. These eight categories are:
1.	Demolition
2.	Illumination
3.	Medium - Firing Point
4.	Projectiles
5.	Propellants
6.	Pyrotechnics
7.	Small Arms - Firing Point
8.	Smokes
A final assessment was made as to the emission factor rating assigned based on ordnance-specific
test data only. If the original emission factor data rating assigned was a C, then the emission factor rating
was elevated to an A or B, as appropriate, based upon the data for the whole ordnance category. If the
original emission factor data rating assigned was a D, then the emission factor rating was elevated to a B
or C, as appropriate, based upon the data for the whole ordnance category. The analysis is documented in
an Excel spreadsheet that is located on the EPA website at:
http: //www .epa. gov/ttn/chief/ ap42/i ndcx.html.
Within the current test series, DODIC D540 was included in the Propellant category, which
included more than 20 test data points. As a result, some emission factor ratings associated with this
ordnance were elevated. The emission factor ratings assigned are presented in Appendix A.
6.0 REFERENCES
1.	Report No. 1 for the Firing Point Emission Study Phase II, Military Environmental Technology
Demonstration Center, U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD,
March 2001.
2.	Detailed Test Plan for the Firing Point Emissions Characterization of the Propelling Charges,
155MMM3 andM3Al - Test Matrix No. 1, Military Environmental Technology Demonstration
Center, U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, March 1999.
32
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
3.	Supporting information including Excel spreadsheets, analytical results, field notes, and case
summaries supplied upon request by the Applied Science Test Team - Chemistry Unit, U.S.
Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, July 2004.
4.	Procedures for Preparing Emission Factor Documents, EPA-454/R-95-015, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, November 1997.
5.	Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air,
Second Supplement, EPA/600/4-89/017, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC, June 1988.
6.	Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/sw846.htm.
7.	National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Manual of Analytical Methods
(NMAM), Fourth Edition, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH,
2003.
8.	Information regarding the relationship between emission factor data correlation, the number of
data points available, and the resulting emission factor rating assigned supplied upon request by
Mr. Ron Myers, Measurement Policy Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 2006.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
33

-------
This page left blank intentionally.
Ordnance Detonation

-------
APPENDIX A
COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR ORDNANCE
INCLUDED IN FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY PHASE II SERIES 1 TESTING,
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-l

-------
This page left blank intentionally.
A-2	Ordnance Detonation	7/06

-------
TABLE A1 COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540, CONFIGURATION 1 (M3, ZONE 3, M199 CANNON)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxidef
6.5E-01
2.0E-01
--
630-08-0
Carbon monoxidef
1.8E+00
5.6E-01
--
7439-92-1
Lead8
2.6E-04
8.1E-05
--
74-82-8
Methanef
1.1E-02
3.3E-03
--
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
2.0E-02
6.1E-03
--
--
PM-2.58
2.4E-02
7.4E-03
--
--
PM-108
6.2E-02
1.9E-02
--
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
ND
5.3 E-01
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
8.2E-02
2.5E-02
--
Toxic Chemicals and Hazardous Air Pollutants
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
6.1E-07
1.8E-07
--
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
6.0E-06
1.8E-06
~
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.8 E-02
75-08-8
Acetonitrile1
7.2 E-05
2.2 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
Acrylonitrile1
5.0 E-05
1.5 E-05
~
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
4.2 E-02
1.3 E-02
~
120-12-7
Anthracene8
6.0 E-07
1.8 E-07
~
7440-36-0
Antimony
2.2 E-06
6.8 E-07
~
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
4.5 E-06
1.4 E-06
~
7440-39-3
Barium
1.2 E-04
3.5 E-05
~
71-43-2
Benzene8
7.4 E-04
2.3 E-04
~
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
5.5E-07
1.7E-07
~
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
8.4E-07
2.6E-07
~
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
1.2E-06
3.6E-07
--
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
8.1E-06
2.5E-06
~
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrene8
1.9E-06
5.8E-07
~
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
ND
5.2 E-03
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
ND
7.7 E-05
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
ND
3.1 E-03
101-55-3
4-Bromophenylphenylether
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
ND
1.8 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-3

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
ND
3.0 E-02
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.0 E-06
5.9 E-07
--
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.4 E-04
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
ND
4.2 E-03
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
ND
1.6 E-03
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
7440-47-3
Chromium
1.7 E-05
5.2 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
5.4 E-07
1.7 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
1.5 E-06
4.5 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper8
1.4 E-02
4.1 E-03
--
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
ND
2.9 E-02
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
ND
ND
7.9 E-02
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
1.2 E-07
3.7 E-08
--
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
ND
5.9 E-03
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.7 E-03
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.0 E-03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
ND
3.8 E-03
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
ND
3.2 E-03
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
ND
2.9 E-03
76-14-2
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
A-4
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
~
Total dioxin
9.9 E-09
3.0 E-09
--
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
111-90-0
2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanolk
4.4 E-05
1.3 E-05
~
100-41-4
Ethylbenzenef
ND
ND
2.4 E-03
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
ND
6.4 E-01
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
3.7E-06
1.1E-06
--
86-73-7
Fluorenef
1.9E-06
5.8E-07
~
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
76-13-1
Freon 113s
6.2 E-06
1.9 E-06
--
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.4 E-09
4.3 E-10
~
67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
5.1 E-ll
1.5 E-ll
~
55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
8.4 E-12
2.5 E-12

118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
2.5 E-ll
7.6 E-12
--
57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
7.2 E-ll
2.2 E-ll
--
19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
6.9 E-ll
2.1 E-ll
~
57117-44-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
2.8 E-12
8.5 E-13
~
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.9 E-10
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.4 E-10
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-5

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
ND
1.3 E-01
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
1.2 E-02
3.5 E-03
--
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
3.6 E-06
1.1 E-06
--
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
7439-96-5
Manganesef
4.9 E-05
1.5 E-05
--
75-09-2
Methylene chloride8
2.0 E-03
6.0 E-04
--
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
4.2 E-05
1.3 E-05
--
7440-02-0
Nickel
3.0 E-05
9.3 E-06
--
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
1.6 E-04
4.9 E-05
--
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
8.1 E-09
2.5 E-09
--
39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1.5 E-10
4.6 E-ll
--
40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.7 E-ll
5.1 E-12
--
57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.8 E-10
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
1.5 E-12
4.6 E-13
--
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
5.5 E-06
1.7 E-06
--
108-95-2
Phenol8
2.4E-06
7.2E-07
--
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
115-07-1
Propylene8
ND
ND
9.6 E-01
A-6
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
129-00-0
Pyrene8
1.1 E-05
3.2 E-06
--
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND
ND
2.6 E-04
7440-22-4
Silver
8.5 E-07
2.6 E-07
--
100-42-5
Styrene
ND
ND
2.7 E-03
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
3.8 E-12
1.2 E-12
--
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8 -T etrachlorodibenzofuran
1.2 E-12
3.8 E-13
--
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
ND
4.5 E-03
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
7440-28-0
Thallium
ND
ND
7.7 E-05
108-88-3
Toluene8
2.1 E-05
6.6 E-06
--
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
0
0
--
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
ND
4.0 E-03
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
ND
ND
5.1 E-03
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride8
3.9 E-05
1.2 E-05
--
106-42-3 /
108-38-3
mXylene / p-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-47-6
ortho-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
7440-66-6
Zinc
1.9 E-03
5.9 E-04
--
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone
0
0
--
74-86-2
Acetylene8
ND
ND
6.0 E-01
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde
ND
ND
4.4 E-02
65-85-0
Benzoic acidk
3.4 E-05
1.0 E-05
--
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-7

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
106-97-8
Butane
ND
ND
1.3
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3 -methylphenol
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
540-97-6
Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyk
0
0
--
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
ND
3.3 E-03
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
5779-94-2
2,5 -Dimethy lbenzaldehyde
ND
ND
5.6 E-02
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
ND
6.9 E-01
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
ND
8.3 E-02
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
ND
9.8 E-04
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
ND
1.3
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.0 E-03
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
ND
9.8 E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
74-98-6
Propane
ND
ND
1.0
121-82-4
RDX
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
7704-34-9
Sulfur'
8.5 E-05
2.6 E-05
--
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
1334-78-7
o,m,p-Tolualdehyde
ND
ND
5.0 E-02
108-67-8
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
99-35-4
1,3,5 -Trinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene8
ND
ND
4.9 E-04
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
A-8
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A1 (cont.)
a CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b ND = nondetected.
c Emission factors rated C unless otherwise noted.
d NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is 3.28 pounds per item.
e Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-9

-------
TABLE A2 COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540, CONFIGURATION 2, M3, ZONE 5, M199 CANNON


Emission Factorb c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound


Detection Level

lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
mg/m3e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxidef
1.3
2.2 E-01
--
630-08-0
Carbon monoxide11
3.3
5.8 E-01
--
7439-92-1
Lead8
3.7 E-04
6.4 E-05
--
74-82-8
Methanef
2.1 E-02
3.7 E-03
--
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
7.1 E-02
1.2 E-02
--
--
PM-2.58
3.8 E-02
6.7 E-03
--
--
PM-108
9.7 E-02
1.7 E-02
--
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
ND
5.3 E-01
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
1.4 E-01
2.4 E-02
--
Toxic Chemicals and Hazardous Air Pollutants
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
0
0
--
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
3.4 E-06
5.8 E-07
~
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.8 E-02
75-05-8
Acetonitrile1
6.4 E-05
1.0 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
Acrylonitrile1
5.3 E-05
8.9 E-06
~
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
9.8 E-02
1.7 E-02
--
120-12-7
Anthracene8
6.8E-07
1.2E-07
~
7440-36-0
Antimony
3.4 E-06
5.9 E-07
~
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
7.5 E-06
1.3 E-06
~
7440-39-3
Barium
7.4 E-05
1.3 E-05
--
71-43-2
Benzene8
9.1 E-04
1.6 E-04
~
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
6.3E-07
1.1E-07
~
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
1.2E-06
2.1E-07
~
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
1.6E-06
2.8E-07
~
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
8.6E-06
1.5E-06
--
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrene8
2.2E-06
3.9E-07
~
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
ND
5.2 E-03
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
ND
7.8 E-05
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
ND
3.1 E-03
101-55-3
4-Bromophenylphenylether
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
ND
1.8 E-03
A-10
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
ND
3.0 E-02
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.6 E-06
4.5 E-07
--
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
ND
2.1 E-02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.4 E-04
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
ND
4.2 E-03
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
ND
1.6 E-03
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
7440-47-3
Chromium
1.6 E-05
2.8 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
6.7 E-07
1.2 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
2.1 E-06
3.6 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper8
1.9 E-02
3.2 E-03
--
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
ND
2.9 E-02
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
1.5 E-03
2.5 E-04
--
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
1.1 E-07
2.0 E-08
--
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
ND
5.9 E-03
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.7 E-03
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.0 E-03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
ND
3.8 E-03
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
ND
3.2 E-03
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
ND
2.9 E-03
76-14-2
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-ll

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
~
Total dioxin
3.0 E-09
5.3 E-10
--
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
100-41-4
Ethylbenzenef
ND
ND
2.4 E-03
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
ND
6.4 E-01
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phtlialate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
3.6E-06
6.2E-07
--
86-73-7
Fluorenef
1.8E-06
3.1E-07
--
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
76-13-1
Freon-113s
9.7 E-06
1.7 E-06
~
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
3.6 E-10
6.3 E-ll
--
67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofurank
1.5 E-10
2.7 E-ll
~
55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofurank
4.5 E-12
7.8 E-13
~
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
5.0 E-10
57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
4.2 E-ll
7.3 E-12
--
19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.5 E-ll
2.7 E-12
--
57117-44-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1.4 E-ll
2.5 E-12
~
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
3.1 E-10
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
7.7 E-12
1.3 E-12
--
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
ND
1.3 E-01
A-12
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
2.0 E-02
3.5 E-03
--
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
3.6 E-06
6.2 E-07
--
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
7439-96-5
Manganesef
9.1 E-05
1.6 E-05
--
75-09-2
Methylene chloride8
1.8 E-03
3.2 E-04
--
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
2.2E-05
3.8E-06
--
7440-02-0
Nickel
3.0 E-05
5.3 E-06
--
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
2.9 E-04
5.1 E-05
--
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
2.1 E-09
3.7 E-10
--
39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
9.6 E-ll
1.7 E-ll
--
40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
8.1 E-12
1.4 E-12
--
57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8 -Pentachlorodibenzofurank
2.2 E-ll
3.9 E-12
~
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofurank
2.0 E-ll
3.5 E-12
--
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
5.2E-06
9.0E-07
~
108-95-2
Phenol8
3.9E-05
6.7E-06
~
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
115-07-1
Propylene
ND
ND
9.6 E-01
129-00-0
Pyrene8
1.1E-05
1.9E-06
--
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND
ND
2.6 E-04
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-13

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
7440-22-4
Silver
1.2 E-06
2.2 E-07
--
100-42-5
Styrene
ND
ND
2.7 E-03
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxink
1.0 E-10
1.8 E-ll
--
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8 -T etrachlorodibenzofurank
4.6 E-ll
8.0 E-12
--
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
ND
4.5 E-03
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
7440-28-0
Thallium
ND
ND
7.8 E-05
108-88-3
Toluene8
2.5 E-05
4.4 E-06
--
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
0
0
--
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
ND
4.0 E-03
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
ND
ND
5.1 E-03
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride8
4.2 E-05
7.2 E-06
--
106-42-3 /
108-38-3
mXylene / p-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-47-6
ortho-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
7440-66-6
Zinc
2.9 E-03
5.1 E-04
--
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone
0
0
--
74-86-2
Acetylene8
ND
ND
6.0 E-01
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde
ND
ND
4.4 E-02
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
106-97-8
Butane
ND
ND
1.3
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3 -methylphenol
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
ND
3.3 E-03
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
A-14
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
lb/item
lb/lb NEWd
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
5779-94-2
2,5 -Dimethy lbenzaldehyde
ND
ND
5.6 E-02
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
ND
6.9 E-01
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
ND
4.2 E-02
149-57-5
Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-1
2.7 E-05
4.7 E-06
--
104-76-7
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl-1
0
0
~
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
ND
9.7 E-04
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
ND
1.3
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.1 E-03
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
ND
9.7 E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
74-98-6
Propane
ND
ND
1.0
121-82-4
RDX
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
7704-34-9
Sulfur1
1.4 E-04
2.5 E-05
--
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
1334-78-7
o,m,p-Tolualdehyde
ND
ND
1.5 E-01
108-67-8
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
99-35-4
1,3,5 -Trinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
a	CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b	ND = nondetected.
C
d	NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is 5.75 pounds per item.
e	Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f	Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-15

-------
TABLE A2 (cont.)
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the factor is based upon "C" rated test data.
1 Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
A-16
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A3 COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540,CONFIGURATION 3, M3A1, ZONE 3, M199 CANNON


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxidef
7.6 E-01
2.2 E-01
--
630-08-0
Carbon monoxidef
2.0
5.8 E-01
--
7439-92-1
Lead8
2.5 E-04
7.1 E-05
--
74-82-8
Methanef
1.1 E-02
3.1 E-03
--
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
ND
ND
3.8 E-01
--
PM-2.58
2.5 E-02
7.0 E-03
--
--
PM-108
4.6 E-02
1.3 E-02
--
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
ND
5.3 E-01
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
6.4 E-02
1.8 E-02
--
Toxic Chemicals and Hazardous Air Pollutants
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
7.0E-07
2.0E-07
--
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
6.1E-06
1.8E-06
--
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.8 E-02
75-05-8
Acetonitrile1
5.4 E-05
1.6 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
Acrylonitrile1
8.6 E-05
2.5 E-05
--
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
4.4 E-02
1.3 E-02
--
120-12-7
Anthracene8
5.1 E-07
1.4 E-07
~
7440-36-0
Antimony
ND
ND
1.8 E-04
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
1.5 E-06
4.2 E-07
--
7440-39-3
Barium
3.1 E-05
8.9 E-06
~
71-43-2
Benzene8
7.4 E-04
2.1 E-04
~
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
3.1E-07
8.8E-08
~
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
1.1E-06
3.1E-07
--
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
7.1E-07
2.0E-07
~
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
4.9E-06
1.4E-06
~
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrene8
1.4E-06
4.0E-07
~
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
ND
5.2 E-03
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
ND
7.9 E-05
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
ND
3.1 E-03
101-55-3
4-Bromophenylphenylether
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
ND
1.8 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-17

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
ND
3.0 E-02
7440-43-9
Cadmium
7.9 E-07
2.3 E-07
--
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.4 E-04
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
ND
4.2 E-03
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
ND
1.6 E-03
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.7 E-06
2.5 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
3.8 E-07
1.1 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
7.8 E-07
2.2 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper8
8.5 E-03
2.4 E-03
--
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
ND
2.9 E-02
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
ND
ND
8.0 E-02
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
7.8 E-08
2.2 E-08
--
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
ND
5.9 E-03
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.7 E-03
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.0 E-03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
ND
3.8 E-03
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
ND
3.2 E-03
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
ND
2.9 E-03
A-18
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
76-14-2
1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
--
Total dioxin
6.4 E-10
1.8 E-10
--
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
100-41-4
Ethylbenzenef
ND
ND
2.4 E-03
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
ND
6.4 E-01
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
2.3E-06
6.5E-07
--
86-73-7
Fluorenef
2.4E-06
6.9E-07
--
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
76-13-1
Freon-113s
1.1 E-05
3.0 E-06
~
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.2 E-10
3.4 E-ll
--
67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
7.9 E-12
2.3 E-12
~
55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.5 E-10
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
4.5 E-10
57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.2 E-ll
3.4 E-12
--
19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.4 E-ll
3.9 E-12
--
57117-44-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
1.4 E-10
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.7 E-10
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.2 E-10
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-19

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
ND
1.3 E-01
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
4.7 E-03
1.4 E-03
--
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
2.5 E-06
7.1 E-07
--
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
7439-96-5
Manganesef
2.8 E-05
7.9 E-06
--
75-09-2
Methylene dichloride
2.6 E-03
7.5 E-04
--
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
3.3 E-05
9.3 E-06
--
7440-02-0
Nickel
1.5 E-05
4.4 E-06
--
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
3.5 E-05
9.9 E-06
--
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
4.7 E-10
1.3 E-10
--
39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1.6 E-ll
4.5 E-12
--
40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
4.3 E-12
1.2 E-12
--
57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.8 E-10
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
1.5 E-10
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
4.1E-06
1.2E-06
--
108-95-2
Phenol8
1.7E-04
5.0E-05
--
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
115-07-1
Propylene8
ND
ND
9.6 E-01
129-00-0
Pyrene8
5.5 E-06
1.6 E-06
~
A-20
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND
ND
2.6 E-04
7440-22-4
Silver
5.1 E-07
1.4 E-07
--
100-42-5
Styrene
ND
ND
2.7 E-03
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
ND
ND
3.4 E-10
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
4.4 E-10
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
ND
4.5 E-03
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
7440-28-0
Thallium
ND
ND
7.9 E-05
108-88-3
Toluene8
3.6 E-05
1.0 E-05
--
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
0
0
--
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
ND
4.0 E-03
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
ND
ND
5.1 E-03
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride8
4.1 E-05
1.2 E-05
--
106-42-3 /
108-38-3
mXylene / p-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-47-6
ortho-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
7440-66-6
Zinc
1.8 E-03
5.2 E-04
--
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone
0
0
--
74-86-2
Acetylene8
ND
ND
6.0 E-01
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde
ND
ND
4.4 E-02
4748-78-1
Benzaldehyde, 4-ethylk
3.8 E-05
1.1 E-05
--
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
106-97-8
Butane
ND
ND
1.3
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-21

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
ND
3.3 E-03
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
5779-94-2
2,5 -Dimethy lbenzaldehyde
ND
ND
5.6 E-02
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
ND
6.9 E-01
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
ND
4.2 E-02
104-76-7
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl-k
0
0
--
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
ND
9.6 E-04
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
ND
1.3
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.6 E-03
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
ND
9.6 E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
74-98-6
Propane
ND
ND
1.0
121-82-4
RDX
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
7704-34-9
Sulfur'
8.2 E-05
2.4 E-05
--
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
1334-78-7
o,m,p-Tolualdehyde
ND
ND
1.0 E-01
108-67-8
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
99-35-4
1,3,5 -T rinitrobenzene8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
A-22
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A3 (cont.)
a CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b ND = nondetected.
c Emission factors rated C unless otherwise noted.
d NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is 3.50 pounds per item.
e Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-23

-------
TABLE A4 COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540, CONFIGURATION 4, M3A1, ZONE 3, M284 CANNON


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxide11
7.6 E-01
2.3 E-01
No Data
630-08-0
Carbon monoxidef
2.0
6.0 E-01
--
7439-92-1
Lead8
3.1 E-04
9.5 E-05
--
74-82-8
Methanef
8.6 E-03
2.6 E-03
--
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
2.4 E-02
7.4 E-03
--
--
PM-2.58
2.7 E-02
8.2 E-03
--
--
PM-108
5.1 E-02
1.5 E-02
--
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
ND
5.3 E-01
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
5.9 E-02
1.8 E-02
--
Hazardous Air Pollutants and Toxic Chemicals
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
1.8 E-06
5.5 E-07
--
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
7.8 E-06
2.4 E-06
--
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.8 E-02
75-05-8
Acetonitrile1
8.7 E-05
2.6 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
Acrylonitrile1
1.1 E-04
3.5 E-05
--
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
4.4 E-02
1.3 E-02
--
120-12-7
Anthracene8
7.8 E-07
2.4 E-07
--
7440-36-0
Antimony
ND
ND
1.9 E-04
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
3.7 E-06
1.1 E-06
--
7440-39-3
Barium
3.7 E-05
1.1 E-05
--
71-43-2
Benzene8
6.3 E-04
1.9 E-04
--
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
5.2 E-07
1.6 E-07
--
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
1.1 E-06
3.4 E-07
--
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
9.5 E-07
2.9 E-07
--
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
6.7 E-06
2.0 E-06
~
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrene8
1.8 E-06
5.5 E-07
~
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
ND
5.2 E-03
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
ND
7.9 E-05
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
ND
3.1 E-03
101-55-3
4-Bromophenyl phenylether
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
A-24
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
ND
1.8 E-03
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
ND
3.0 E-02
7440-43-9
Cadmium
ND
ND
7.9 E-05
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.4 E-04
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
ND
4.2 E-03
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
ND
1.6 E-03
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.5 E-06
2.0 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
5.0 E-07
1.5 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
1.1 E-06
3.4 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper8
3.4 E-03
1.0 E-03
--
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
ND
2.9 E-02
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
ND
ND
8.1 E-02
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
7.0 E-08
2.1 E-08
--
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
ND
5.9 E-03
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.7 E-03
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.0 E-03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
ND
3.8 E-03
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
ND
3.2 E-03
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-25

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
ND
2.9 E-03
76-14-2
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
--
Total dioxin/furan compounds
7.4 E-10
2.2 E-10
--
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
100-41-4
Ethylbenzenef
ND
ND
2.4 E-03
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
ND
6.4 E-01
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phtlialate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
2.6 E-06
8.0 E-07
~
86-73-7
Fluorenef
2.8 E-06
8.4 E-07
~
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
76-13-1
Freon-113s
1.5 E-05
4.7 E-06
~
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
7.3 E-ll
2.2 E-ll
~
67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
2.5 E-ll
7.5 E-12
--
55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.7 E-10
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
4.8 E-10
57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
5.6 E-12
1.7 E-12
--
19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
3.2 E-12
9.9 E-13
--
57117-44-9
l,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofurank
1.8 E-12
5.5 E-13
~
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.8 E-10
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.3 E-10
A-26
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
ND
1.3 E-01
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
1.8 E-02
5.4 E-03
--
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
2.8 E-06
8.6 E-07
--
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
7439-96-5
Manganesef
2.6 E-05
7.9 E-06
--
75-09-2
Methylene dichloride
3.1 E-03
9.6 E-04
--
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
4.8 E-05
1.5 E-05
--
7440-02-0
Nickel
1.1 E-05
3.4 E-06
--
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
6.5 E-05
2.0 E-05
~
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
1.4 E-05
4.2 E-06
--
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
5.8 E-10
1.8 E-10
--
39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
3.0 E-ll
9.2 E-12
--
40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
2.6 E-10
57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.8 E-10
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofurank
1.9 E-12
5.9 E-13
--
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
5.1 E-06
1.5 E-06
--
108-95-2
Phenol8
1.8 E-05
5.4 E-06
--
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
115-07-1
Propylene8
ND
ND
9.6 E-01
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-27

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
129-00-0
Pyrene8
7.4 E-06
2.3 E-06
--
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND
ND
2.6 E-04
7440-22-4
Silver
ND
ND
5.3 E-05
100-42-5
Styrene
ND
ND
2.7 E-03
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acidk
2.4 E-03
7.2 E-04
--
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1.0 E-ll
3.1 E-12
--
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8 -T etrachlorodibenzofiiran
6.6 E-12
2.0 E-12
--
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
ND
4.5 E-03
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
7440-28-0
Thallium
ND
ND
7.9 E-05
108-88-3
Toluene8
8.3 E-06
2.5 E-06
--
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
3.0 E-04
9.2 E-05
--
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene
ND
ND
3.9 E-03
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
ND
4.0 E-03
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
ND
ND
5.1 E-03
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride8
4.5 E-05
1.4 E-05
--
106-42-3,
108-38-3
m-Xylene, p-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-47-6
o-Xylene8
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
7440-66-6
Zinc
6.0 E-04
1.8 E-04
--
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone
0
0
--
74-86-2
Acetylene8
ND
ND
6.0 E-01
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde
ND
ND
4.4 E-02
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
106-97-8
Butane
ND
ND
1.3
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
A-28
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
ND
3.3 E-03
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
5779-94-2
2,5 -Dimethy lbenzaldehyde
ND
ND
5.6 E-02
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
ND
6.9 E-01
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
ND
4.2 E-02
104-76-7
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl-1
0
0
--
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
ND
9.5 E-04
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
ND
1.3
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.3 E-03
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.7 E-03
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
10544-50-0
Octasulfur1
5.6 E-05
1.7 E-05
--
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
ND
9.5 E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
74-98-6
Propane
ND
ND
1.0E
121-82-4
RDX
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
1334-78-7
o,m,p-Tolualdehyde
ND
ND
1.0 E-01
108-67-8
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
99-35-4
1,3,5 -Trinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene8
ND
ND
4.7 E-04
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-29

-------
TABLE A4 (cont.)
a CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b ND = nondetected.
c Emission factors rated C unless otherwise noted.
d NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is 3.28 pounds per item.
e Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the factor is based upon "C" rated test data.
1 Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
A-30
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A5 COMPOUNDS ANALYZED AND EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540, CONFIGURATION 5, M3A1, ZONE 3, M284 CANNON


Emission Factorb,c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxidef
7.2E-01
2.1 E-01
--
630-08-0
Carbon monoxidef
1.9
5.5 E-01
--
7439-92-1
Lead8
1.9 E-04
5.5 E-05
--
74-82-8
Methanef
9.7 E-03
2.8 E-03
--
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
5.3 E-02
1.5 E-02
--
--
PM-2.58
3.4 E-02
9.8 E-03
--
--
PM-108
6.1 E-02
1.7 E-02
--
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
ND
5.3 E-01
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
6.9 E-02
2.0 E-02
--
Hazardous Air Pollutants and Toxic Chemicals
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
6.5 E-06
1.9 E-06
--
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.8 E-02
75-05-5
Acetonitrile1
1.4 E-04
4.1 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
AcrylyonitrileJ
4.6 E-04
1.3 E-04
--
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
6.4 E-02
1.8 E-02
--
120-12-7
Anthracene8
5.6 E-07
1.6 E-07
--
7440-36-0
Antimony
ND
ND
1.9 E-04
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
2.4 E-06
6.8 E-07
--
7440-39-3
Barium
5.4 E-05
1.6 E-05
--
71-43-2
Benzene8
6.9 E-04
2.0 E-04
~
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
3.5 E-07
1.0 E-07
--
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
9.4 E-07
2.7 E-07
~
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
5.8 E-07
1.7 E-07
~
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
3.4 E-06
9.8 E-07
~
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrene8
1.4 E-06
4.0 E-07
~
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
ND
5.2 E-03
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
ND
8.2 E-05
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
ND
3.1 E-03
101-55-3
4-Bromophenyl phenylether
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-31

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
ND
1.8 E-03
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
ND
3.0 E-02
7440-43-9
Cadmium
ND
ND
8.2 E-05
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
ND
4.6 E-03
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
ND
2.2 E-02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.4 E-04
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
ND
2.1 E-03
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
ND
4.2 E-03
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
ND
1.6 E-03
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
7440-47-3
Chromium
5.0 E-06
1.4 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
3.5 E-07
1.0 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
7.7 E-07
2.2 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper
2.7 E-03
7.6 E-04
--
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
ND
2.9 E-02
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
ND
ND
8.1 E-02
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
6.8 E-08
2.0 E-08
--
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
ND
5.9 E-03
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.7 E-03
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
3.0 E-03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
ND
3.8 E-03
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
ND
3.2 E-03
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
ND
3.5 E-03
A-32
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
ND
2.9 E-03
76-14-2
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
--
Total dioxin/furan compounds
7.0 E-10
2.0 E-10
--
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
100-41-4
Ethyl benzenef
ND
ND
2.4 E-03
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
ND
6.4 E-01
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
1.9 E-06
5.5 E-07
--
86-73-7
Fluorenef
2.5 E-07
7.1 E-08
--
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
ND
1.2 E-02
76-13-1
Freon-113s
1.0 E-05
2.9 E-06
--
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.1 E-10
3.2 E-ll
~
67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
7.9 E-12
2.3 E-12
~
55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
3.2 E-10
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
ND
4.8 E-03
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
5.4 E-10
57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
9.5 E-12
2.7 E-12
--
19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.1 E-ll
3.1 E-12
--
57117-44-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
1.8 E-10
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
3.1 E-10
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.6 E-10
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-33

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)


Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
ND
1.3 E-01
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
1.1 E-02
3.2 E-03
--
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
1.9 E-06
5.6 E-07
--
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
7439-96-5
Manganesef
1.6 E-05
4.7 E-06
--
75-09-2
Methylene chloride8
2.1 E-03
6.0 E-04
--
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
4.0 E-05
1.1 E-05
--
7440-02-0
Nickel
7.8 E-06
2.2 E-06
--
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
2.5 E-04
7.1 E-05
--
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
6.9 E-05
2.0 E-05
--
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
5.4 E-10
1.5 E-10
--
39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1.7 E-ll
4.8 E-12
--
40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
ND
ND
3.3 E-10
57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
3.4 E-10
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
2.0 E-10
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
1.9 E-06
5.5 E-07
--
108-95-2
Phenol8
1.2 E-04
3.4 E-05
--
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
ND
2.4 E-02
115-07-1
Propylene8
ND
ND
9.6 E-01
A-34
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)



Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound

lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
129-00-0
Pyrene8

3.9 E-06
1.1 E-06
--
7782-49-2
Selenium

ND
ND
2.7 E-04
7440-22-4
Silver

ND
ND
5.4 E-05
100-42-5
Styrene

ND
ND
2.7 E-03
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acid

3.7 E-03
1.1 E-03
--
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p
-dioxin
ND
ND
4.3 E-10
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
ND
ND
1.2 E-10
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

ND
ND
4.5 E-03
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene

ND
ND
4.6 E-03
7440-28-0
Thallium

ND
ND
8.2 E-05
108-88-3
Toluene8

4.5 E-05
1.3 E-05
--
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

ND
ND
4.6 E-03
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane

8.8 E-04
2.5 E-04
--
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane

ND
ND
3.9 E-03
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene

ND
ND
3.9 E-03
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane

ND
ND
4.0 E-03
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

ND
ND
2.2 E-03
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

ND
ND
2.2 E-03
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

ND
ND
2.3 E-03
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride8

ND
ND
5.1 E-03
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride

4.1 E-05
1.2 E-05
--
106-42-3,
108-38-3
m-Xylene, p-Xylene8

ND
ND
2.3 E-03
95-47-6
o-Xylene8

ND
ND
2.5 E-03
7440-66-6
Zinc

5.0 E-04
1.4 E-04
--
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone

0
0
--
74-86-2
Acetylene8

ND
ND
6.0 E-01
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene

ND
ND
4.8 E-04
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene

ND
ND
4.8 E-04
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde

ND
ND
4.4 E-02
4748-78-1
Benzaldehyde, 4-ethyl-k

4.1 E-05
1.2 E-05
--
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol

ND
ND
2.2 E-03
106-97-8
Butane

ND
ND
1.3
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-35

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factorb'c
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3,e
lb per item
lb per lb
NEWd
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3 -methylphenol
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
ND
3.3 E-03
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
ND
3.4 E-03
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
5779-94-2
2,5 -Dimethy lbenzaldehyde
ND
ND
5.6 E-02
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
ND
6.9 E-01
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
ND
4.2 E-02
104-76-7
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl-k
5.9 E-05
1.7 E-05
--
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
ND
9.6 E-04
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
ND
1.3
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
2.2 E-03
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
ND
4.4 E-03
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
ND
9.6 E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
ND
1.4 E-01
74-98-6
Propane
ND
ND
1.0
121-82-4
RDX
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
1334-78-7
o,m,p-Tolualdehyde
ND
ND
1.0 E-01
108-67-8
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
ND
ND
2.5 E-03
99-35-4
1,3,5 -Trinitrobenzene
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene8
ND
ND
4.8 E-04
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
ND
3.6 E-02
A-36
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A5 (cont.)
a CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b ND = nondetected.
c Emission factors rated C unless otherwise noted.
d NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is 3.50 pounds per item.
e Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-37

-------
TABLE A6 AVERAGE EMISSION FACTORS DEVELOPED FOR
DODIC D540, 155-MM PROPELLING CHARGE


Average
Minimum
CASRN3
Compound
Emission Factor,
Detection Level


lb per lb NEWb c d
mg/m3,e
Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Criteria Pollutants, and Total Suspended Particulates
124-38-9
Carbon dioxidef
2.1E-01
—
630-08-0
Carbon monoxidef
5.7E-01
—
7439-92-1
Lead8
7.3E-05
—
74-82-8
Methanef
3.1E-03
—
--
Oxides of nitrogenf
4.6E-02
—
--
PM-2.58
7.8E-03
—
~
PM-108
1.6E-02
—
7446-09-5
Sulfur dioxide
ND
1.8E-03
12789-66-1
Total suspended particulate8
2.1E-02
—
Hazardous Air Pollutants and Toxic Chemicals
83-32-9
Acenaphthene8
2.2 E-06
--
208-96-8
Acenaphthylenef
1.7 E-06
--
75-07-0
Acetaldehyde8
ND
1.8 E-02
75-05-5
Acetonitrile1
2.3 E-05
--
107-02-8
Acrolein
ND
2.3 E-02
107-13-1
Acrylonitrile1
4.3 E-05
--
107-05-1
Allyl chloride
ND
2.8 E-03
7664-41-7
Ammoniaf
1.5 E-02
--
120-12-7
Anthracene8
1.7 E-07
~
7440-36-0
Antimony
5.6 E-07
~
7440-38-2
Arsenic8
9.8 E-07
~
7440-39-3
Barium
1.7 E-05
~
71-43-2
Benzene8
2.0 E-04
--
56-55-3
Benzo [a] anthracenef
1.2E-07
~
205-99-2
Benzo [b] fluoranthene8
2.8E-07
~
207-08-9
Benzo [k] fluoranthene8
2.6E-07
~
191-24-2
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene8
1.7E-06
~
50-32-8
Benzo [a]pyrenef
4.6E-07
--
100-44-7
Benzyl chloride
ND
1.8E-05
7440-41-7
Beryllium
ND
2.8E-07
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ND
1.1E-05
101-55-3
4-Bromophenylphenylether
ND
7.8E-06
106-99-0
1,3-Butadiene
ND
6.4E-06
A-38
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Average
Emission Factor,
lb per lb NEWb c d
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
85-68-7
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND
7.8E-06
123-72-8
Butyraldehyde
ND
1.1 E-04
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.6E-05
--
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
1.6E-05
106-47-8
4-Chloroaniline
ND
9.1E-06
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND
8.3E-07
75-00-3
Chloroethane
ND
7.6E-06
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
7.8E-06
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
7.8E-06
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND
1.5E-05
74-87-3
Chloromethane
ND
5.7E-06
91-58-7
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
7.8E-06
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
ND
7.8E-06
7005-72-3
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
ND
7.8E-06
7440-47-3
Chromium
2.8 E-06
--
218-01-9
Chrysene
1.3 E-07
--
7440-48-4
Cobalt
3.2 E-07
--
7440-50-8
Copper8
2.3 E-03
~
106-44-5
p-Cresol
ND
7.8E-06
4170-30-3
Crotonaldehyde
ND
1.0E-04
57-12-5
Particulate cyanide
1.7 E-04
~
53-70-3
Dibenz [a,h] anthracene1
2.4 E-08
~
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
ND
7.8E-06
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
2.1E-05
84-74-2
Dibutyl phthalate
ND
8.5E-05
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.3E-05
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.2E-05
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.1E-05
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane8
ND
1.4E-05
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ND
1.1E-05
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane8
ND
1.2E-05
120-83-2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
7.8E-06
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.2E-05
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
1.0E-05
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-39

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Average
Emission Factor,
lb per lb NEWb c d
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
76-14-2
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND
1.7E-05
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
7.8E-06
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
7.8E-06
99-65-0
1,3 -Dinitrobenzene
ND
1.7E-06
534-52-1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
9.1E-06
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
9.1E-06
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
1.7E-06
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Total dioxin/furan compounds
ND
8.3 E-10
1.7E-06
122-39-4
Diphenyl amine
ND
4.2E-05
111-90-0
2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanolk
1.3E-05
—
100-41-4
Ethylbenzenef
ND
8.4E-06
74-85-1
Ethylenef
ND
2.3E-03
117-81-7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND
8.5E-05
206-44-0
Fluoranthene8
7.5E-07
—
86-73-7
Fluorenef
5.0E-07
—
50-00-0
Formaldehyde8
ND
4.4E-05
76-13-1
Freon 113s
2.8E-06
—
35822-46-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.2E-10

67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
1.1E-11

55673-89-7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
Heptachlorodibenzofuran
8.5E-11

118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
7.8E-06
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
1.7E-05
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
7.8E-06
39227-28-6
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
1.5E-10

57653-85-7
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
7.5E-12

19408-74-3
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
6.3E-12

57117-44-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
3.3E-11
—
72918-21-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
ND
9.5E-13
60851-34-5
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
7.1E-11
—
A-40
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Average
Emission Factor,
lb per lb NEWb c d
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND
7.8E-06
7647-01-0
Hydrochloric acid
ND
4.6E-04
74-90-8
Hydrogen cyanide8
3.4E-03
—
7664-39-3
Hydrogen fluoride
ND
5.0E-04
193-39-5
Indeno [ 1,2,3 -cd]pyreneh
7.7E-07
—
78-59-1
Isophorone
ND
7.8E-06
7439-96-5
Manganesef
1.0E-05
—
75-09-2
Methylene chloride8
6.4E-04
—
91-57-6
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
7.8E-06
95-48-7
2-Methylphenol
ND
7.8E-06
91-20-3
Naphthalenef
1.0E-05
—
7440-02-0
Nickel
4.9E-06
—
7697-37-2
Nitric acid8
1.4E-02
—
100-01-6
4-Nitroaniline
ND
9.1E-06
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND
1.7E-06
55-63-0
Nitroglycerin8
ND
1.7E-06
88-75-5
2-Nitrophenol
ND
7.8E-06
100-02-7
4-Nitrophenol
ND
9.1E-06
62-75-9
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
7.8E-06
86-30-6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
7.8E-06
621-64-7
n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
7.8E-06
1843-05-6
Octabenzone1
2.7E-05
—
3268-87-9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
6.6E-10

39001-02-0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1.6E-11

40321-76-4
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin
6.0E-11

57117-41-6
1,2,3,7,8 -Pentachlorodibenzofuran
9.0E-11
—
57117-31-4
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
3.6E-11
—
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND
9.1E-06
85-01-8
Phenanthrene8
1.2E-06
—
108-95-2
Phenol8
1.9E-05
—
123-38-6
Propionaldehyde
ND
8.5E-05
115-07-1
Propylene8
ND
3.4E-03
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-41

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Average
Emission Factor,
lb per lb NEWb c d
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
129-00-0
Pyrene8
2.0E-06
—
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND
9.3E-07
7440-22-4
Silver
1.1E-05
—
100-42-5
Styrene
ND
9.5E-06
7664-93-9
Sulfuric acid
1.5E-02
—
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
8.1E-11
—
51207-31-9
2,3,7,8 -T etrachlorodibenzofuran
5.9E-11
—
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
1.6E-05
127-18-4
T etrachloroethy lene
ND
1.6E-05
7440-28-0
Thallium
ND
2.8E-07
108-88-3
Toluene8
7.3E-06
—
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
1.6E-05
71-55-6
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
6.9E-05
—
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
1.4E-05
79-01-6
Trichloroethylene
ND
1.4E-05
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
1.4E-05
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
7.8E-06
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
7.8E-06
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND
8.3E-06
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.8E-05
75-35-4
Vinylidene chloride8
1.1E-05
—
106-42-3,
108-38-3
m-Xylene, p-Xylene8
ND
8.1E-06
95-47-6
o-Xylene8
ND
8.9E-06
7440-66-6
Zinc
3.9E-04
—
Other Pollutants
67-64-1
Acetone
0
—
74-86-2
Acetylene8
ND
2.1E-03
35572-78-2
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
1.7E-06
19406-51-0
4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene
ND
1.7E-06
100-52-7
Benzaldehyde
ND
1.6E-04
65-85-0
Benzoic acidk
1.1E-05
—
4748-78-1
Benzaldehyde, 4-ethylk
3.5E-06
—
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
ND
7.8E-06
106-97-8
Butane
ND
4.7E-03
A-42
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
CASRN3
Compound
Average
Emission Factor,
lb per lb NEWb c d
Minimum
Detection Level
mg/m3e
39638-32-9
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
7.8E-06
59-50-7
4-Chloro-3 -methylphenol
ND
7.8E-06
540-97-6
Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyk
0
—
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
1.2E-05
10061-01-5
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropene
ND
1.2E-05
84-66-2
Diethylphthalate
ND
7.8E-06
5779-94-2
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
ND
2.0E-04
117-84-0
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
7.8E-06
74-84-0
Ethane
ND
2.4E-03
622-96-8
4-Ethyltoluene8
ND
8.0E-06
66-25-1
Hexaldehyde
ND
1.5E-04
149-57-5
Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-k
4.7E-06
—
104-76-7
1-Hexanol, 2-ethylk
4.2E-06
—
2691-41-0
HMX
ND
3.4E-06
10035-10-6
Hydrogen bromide
ND
5.0E-04
75-28-5
Isobutane
ND
4.7E-03
590-86-3
Isovaleraldehyde
ND
1.3E-04
1334-78-7
Methyl benzaldehyde
ND
7.8E-06
88-74-7
2-Nitroaniline
ND
9.1E-06
99-09-2
3-Nitroaniline
ND
1.7E-06
88-72-2
2-Nitrotoluene
ND
1.7E-06
99-08-1
3-Nitrotoluene
ND
1.7E-06
99-99-0
4-Nitrotoluene
1.7E-05
	
10544-50-0
Octasulfurk
ND
3.4E-06
78-11-5
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
ND
5.0E-04
7664-38-2
Phosphoric acid
ND
3.6E-03
74-98-6
Propane
ND
1.7E-06
121-82-4
RDX
2.5E-05
—
7704-34-9
Sulfur'
ND
1.7E-06
479-45-8
Tetryl
ND
3.5E-04
108-67-8
1,3,5 -T rimethylbenzene
ND
8.8E-06
99-35-4
1,3,5 -T rinitrobenzene
ND
1.7E-06
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene8
ND
1.7E-06
110-62-3
Valeraldehyde
ND
1.3E-04
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
A-43

-------
TABLE A6 (cont.)
a CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
b NEW = net explosive weight. The NEW for this ordnance is varies from 3.28 pounds per item to
5.75 pounds per item, depending upon the charge zone used.
c Emission factors rated C unless otherwise noted.
d ND = nondetected.
e Data provided for compounds that were not detected.
f Emission factor rated A because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
8 Emission factor rated B because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number
of test data points.
h Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a B rating.
1 Emission factor based upon C-rated test data, but because of correlation with emission factors for
similar ordnance and number of data points the factor was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
J Emission factor was originally rated D because the factor is for a tentatively identified compound, but
because of correlation with emission factors for similar ordnance and number of data points the factor
was upgraded from a D rating to a C rating.
k Emission factor rated "D" because the compound was tentatively identified.
A-44
Ordnance Detonation
7/06

-------
APPENDIX B
NEW AP-42 SECTIONS FOR ORDNANCE INCLUDED IN FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY
PHASE II SERIES 1 TESTING AT ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
Electronic versions of the new AP-42 sections for ordnance included in Firing Point Emission
Study Phase II Series I testing at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, are located on the EPA website at:
http: //www .epa. gov/ttn/chief/ a p42/i ndex.html.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
B-l

-------
This page left blank intentionally.
B-2	Ordnance Detonation	7/06

-------
APPENDIX C
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AP-42 SECTIONS FOR ORDNANCE INCLUDED IN
FIRING POINT EMISSION STUDY PHASE II SERIES 1 TESTING AT
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND
No public comments were received on the draft version of this document. However, the
document has been modified since the publication of the draft to incorporate revised emission factor
ratings for numerous pollutants. The methodology used to revise the emission factor ratings is presented
in Section 5 of this document, while the revised emission factor ratings are presented in Appendix A.
7/06
Ordnance Detonation
C-l

-------
This page left blank intentionally.
Ordnance Detonation

-------