Project No. 76-NMM-4
CD
O
AIR POLLUTION
EMISSION TEST
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
1*^
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission Measurement Branch
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
-------
EMISSION STUDY
at a
TALC CRUSHING AND GRINDING FACILITY
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Prepared for the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Measurement Branch
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Prepared by
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
25711 Southfield Road
Southfield, Michigan 48075
Project NMM-4
Task 24
Contract No. 68-02-1408
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 3
III. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 27
IV. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 37
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Particle Size Distribution — Baghouse
Inlet No. 1 24
FIGURE 2 Particle Size Distribution — Baghouse
Inlet No. 2 25
FIGURE 3 Particle Size Distribution — Baghouse
Inlet No. 3 26
FIGURE 4 Schematic Diagram of Baghouse and Outlet
Sampling Location 28
FIGURE 5 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Point
Locations — Outlet Stack 29
FIGURE 6 Schematic Diagram of Baghouse Inlets
1, 1 - A, and 1-B 30
FIGURE 7 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Point
Locations — Inlet No. 1 31
FIGURE 8 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Point
Locations — Inlets 1-A and 1-B 32
FIGURE 9 Schematic Diagram of Baghouse Inlets
2 and 3 34
FIGURE 10 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Point
Locat ions — Inlet No . 2 35
FIGURE 11 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Point
Locations — Inlet No. 3 36
FIGURE 12 Schematic Diagram of Particulate Sampling
Train — Baghouse Outlet Stack and Inlet
Ducts 1-A and 1-B 38
-------
i i
Page
FIGURE 13 Schematic Diagram of Particulate Sampling
Train — Baghouse Inlets 1, 2, and 3 39
FIGURE 14 Schematic Diagram of Particle Size Sampling
Train — Baghouse Inlets 1, 2, and 3 40
TABLES
TABLE I Summary of Particulate Emissions (English
Unit s ) 4
TABLE II Summary of Particulate Emissions (Metric
Units) 5
TABLE III Summary of Visible Emissions 7
TABLE IV Particle Size Distribution 21
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Project Participants
APPENDIX B Particulate and Particle Sizing Field Data Sheets
APPENDIX C Visible Emissions Field Data Sheets
APPENDIX D EPA Draft Method 17
APPENDIX E Sampling Summary Sheets
APPENDIX F Particulate Weight Data
APPENDIX G Calibration Data
APPENDIX H Example Calculations
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) retained
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc. to conduct a series of
emission tests at the Eastern Magnesia Talc Company located in
Johnson, Vermont. The purpose of this study was to provide the
EPA with data for the establishment of source performance stand-
ards for the non-metallic mineral-processing industry. This
study was commissioned as Project NMM-4 of Task 24, Contract No.
68-02-1408.
The Eastern Magnesia Talc Company facility combines the
unit operations of talc crushing, milling, and solids classifica-
tion in the production of talc powder. Large pieces of talc-
bearing rock are trucked from a nearby quarry to a storage hopper
at the plant for subsequent crushing. The primary and secondary
crushers reduce the size of the rock to that suitable for charg-
ing to the pebble mill, roller mill, and vertical mill, all of
which produce talc-bearing dust that is later purified and washed
in flotation-type cells. After drying and size classification,
the product talc is stored in silos in preparation for bagging
and shipment to the consumer.
Those unit operations that characteristically could produce
fugitive dust emissions, such as crushing, milling, and grinding,
at the Eastern Magnesia Talc Company are equipped with local ex-
haust dust collection systems. Ductwork carries the emissions
picked up at each operation to a baghouse dust collector.
-------
_ 2 -
Source sampling for the determination of dust loading and
gas flowrate was performed on five different inlets to the bag-
house and the baghouse outlet stack by Clayton Environmental Con-
sultants personnel. Inlet No. 1 comes from the Primary and
Secondary Crushers, Pebble Mill, a nd Roller Mill. Inlet No. 2
comes from the No, 4 Vertical Mill, Inlet No. 3 comes from the
two silos and the bagging and air classification operations.
Inlet No. 1-A comes from the silo storage prior to the No. 3
Vertical Mill, while Inlet No. 1-B comes from the silo storage
prior to the No. 4 Vertical Mill. Particle sizing samples were
obtained at Inlets No. 1, 2, and 3, Opacity readings of the bag-
house outlet stack emissions and opacity readings of the fugitive
dust generated at several locations within the plant were ob-
tained by certified opacity readers from Clayton Environmental
Consultants. Environmental Protection Agency personnel observed
the source testing activities and monitored process operations.
This study was conducted during the week of October 17, 1976.
Appendix A lists the project participants.
-------
- 3 -
II. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Particulate Sampling Results
Tables I and II summarize the results of the particulate
sampling at the baghouse inlets and outlet in English and metric
units, respectively.
Filterable particulate emissions at the baghouse outlet
stack averaged 10.4 pounds per hour and ranged from 8,2 to 11.8
pounds per hour. Total particulate emissions at the baghouse
outlet stack averaged 11.6 pounds per hour and ranged from 11.2
to 12.2 pounds per hour.
Single emission measurements in each of the various inlet
ducts indicated filterable particulate emissions ranging from
31.7 to 852 pounds per hour. These inlet measurements were
not made simultaneously. Consequently, if these levels are
representative of the inlet loadings present during outlet
emission measurements, then the baghouse appears to abate emis-
sions e f fic iently .
The baghouse inlet and outlet stack gas flowrates compare
favorably, with the average outlet flowrate being approximately
7.5 percent greater than the sum of the measured inlet flowrates.
Since the inlet ducts and the baghouse are under a negative static
pressure, this air in-leakage is not unexpected. As Table I
shows, the average measured outlet flowrate is 20,000 DSCFM while
the sum of the measured inlet flowrates is approximately 18,600
DSCFM.
-------
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (ENGLISH UNITS)
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Samp ling
Location
Tes t
No.
1976
Date
Stack Gas
Condi t ion s
Particulate Concentration
Particulate
Emission Rate
(lbs/hr)
Temp
(°F)
Flowrate
Filterable
Total
ACFM
DSCFM
gr/ACF
gr/DSCF
gr/ACF
gr/DSCF
Filterable
To tal
Baghouse
Outle t
1
2
3
10/20
10/20
10/21
80
83
82
21,100
21,300
21,300
20,200
20,200
19,500
0.045
0.065
0.061
0.047
0.068
0.067
0.062
0.067
0. 062
0 .065
0.071
0.068
8.17
11.8
11.2
11.2
12.2
11.3
Average
82
21,200
20,000
0.057
0 .061
0.064
0.068
10.4
11.6
Baghouse
Inlet
No. 1
2
10/20
60
11,500
11,300
8.64
8. 80
8.64
8.80
852
852
Baghouse
In 1 e t
No . 2
1
10/20
160
3,570
2,940
1.04
1.26
1.04
1.26
31.7
31. 7
Baghous e
Inlet
No. 3
3
10/21
45
3,520
3,410
2.99
3.08
2.99
3.08
90.1
90. 1
Baghouse
Inlet
No. 1A
4
10/21
48
396
393
63.7
64.6
-
-
218
-
Baghouse
Inlet
No. IB
5
10/21
52
614
603
8.76
9 .06
-
-
46.8
-
-------
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (METRIC UNITS)
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Sampling
Location
Test
No.
1976
Date
Stack Gas
Conditions
Particulate Concentration
Particulate
Emission Rate
Temp
(°C)
Flowrate
Filterable
Total
(lbs/hr)
Am-tymin
DSm^/min
mg/Am^
mg/DSm^
mg/Am^
mg/DSm^
Filterable
Total
1
10/20
27
598
572
104
108
142
149
3.71
5.11
Baghouse
2
10/20
28
603
572
149
157
154
162
5.39
5.56
Outlet
3
10/21
28
603
552
140
153
142
155
5.07
5.13
Average
28
601
566
131
139
146
155
4. 72
5.26
Baghous e
Inle t
No. 1
2
10/20
16
326
320
19,800
20,100
19,800
20,100
387
387
B aghous e
Inlet
No. 2
1
10/20
71
101
83
2,370
2,880
2,370
2,880
14.4
14.4
Baghouse
Inlet
No. 3
3
10/21
7
100
97
6, 840
7,050
6,840
7,050
40.9
40.9
Baghous e
Inlet
No. 1A
4
10/21
9
11
11
146,000
148,000
-
-
98.7
-
Baghous e
Inlet
No. IB
5
10/21
11
17
17
20,000
20,700
-
-
21.2
-
-------
- 6 -
Of the five particulate emission tests conducted on the inlet
ducts, the tests at locations 1-A and 1-B (Tests No. 4 and 5,
respectively) were abbreviated due to plugging of the filters.
Appendix B contains the field data sheets for all source tests
conducted.
Visible Emissions Observations
Opacity measurements were taken during the study by two
certified visible-emission readers from Clayton Environmental
Consultants. Measurements were taken at several locations in
the plant on October 19, 20, and 21, and at the baghouse outlet
stack on October 20 and 21 in conjunction with the source test-
ing activities.
Each observer took a reading every 15 seconds during the
observation periods. Readings were summed and averaged for each
6-minute period and plotted versus time. The series of 6-minute
averages and the corresponding plots are presented for each in-
plant site in chronological order in Tables III-l through III-9.
Tables III-3, III-5, and III-9 provide summaries of in-
plant visible emissions data at the bagging operation. Tables
II1-4 and III-8 provide summaries of in-plant visible emissions
data at the secondary crushing operation. Tables III-l, III-2,
III-6, and 111- 7 provide summaries of in-plant visible emissions
data at the Pebble Hill, Roller Mill, Primary Crusher, and
Vertical Mill, respectively. Tables 111-10 through 111-12 pro-
vide summaries of visible emissions data at the baghouse outlet
stack. These stack opacity measurement s were taken simultaneously
-------
TABLE III-l
- 7 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/19/76 ' Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Pebble Mill 2
Height of Point of Discharge: in room Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: n/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: 1.5 hrs.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; wooden wall background
S U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVE!
RAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
0*4.
Time
Opa city
Set
Numb er
S tart
End
S um
Ave ra ge
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
1
09 : 59
10:05
N
N
21
2
10:05
10:11
0
0
22
3
10:11
10:17
0
0
23
4
10 :17
10 : 23
0
0
24
5
10:23
10 :29
0
0
25
6
10:29
10:35
N
N
26
7
10:35
10:41
0
0
27
8
10:41
10:47
N
N
28
9
10:47
10:53
N
N
29
10
10:53
10:59
0
0
30
11
10:59
11:05
15
0.6
31
12
11:05
11:11
55
2.3
32
13
11:11
11:17
0
0
33
14
11:17
11: 23
0
0
34
15
11:23
11:29
50
2.1
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
Iketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%) 4
3 ¦
t
2 f
1 -
0
Time, hours
-------
TABLE 111- 2
- 8 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/19/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge : Rp 1 ler Mill
Height of Point of Discharge:in room Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: n/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: 1«5 hrs.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: N
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; other equipment in room
S U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
T Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa c ity
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
Number
S tar t
End
S um
Average
1
13:20
13 :26
215
9.0
21
2
13:26
13:32
385
16.0
22
3
13 :32
13 :38
350
15.0
23
4
13 :38
13:44
300
12.5
24
5
13 :44
13 :50
385
16.0
25
6
13 :50
13:56
325
13.5
26
7
13:56
14:02
355
14.8
27
8
14:02
14:08
325
13.5
28
9
14:08
14:14
250
10.4
29
10
14 :14
14 :20
255
10.6
30
11
14:20
14:26
160
6.7
31
12
14: 26
14:32
130
5.4
32
13
14:32
14:38
155
6.5
33
14
14:38
14:44
120
5.0
34
15
14:44
14:50
135
5.6
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
)pacity
(7,) 16
12 ¦
8 •
4 -
0
Time , hours
-------
TABLE III-3
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
- 9 -
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/19/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Bagger
Height of Point of Discharge: in room Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: approx. 1 hr.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx, 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; light wall background
¦
3 U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa city
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
Number
Start
End
S um
Avera ge
1
15:03
15:09
N
N
21
2
15:09
15 :15
N
N
22
3
15 :15
15 : 21
5
0.2
23
4
15 : 21
15:27
N
N
24
5
15 : 27
15 :33
0
0
25
6
15:36
15 :42
0
0
26
7
15:42
15:48
0
0
27
8
15 :48
15:55
215
7.7
28
9
29
10
30
11
31
12
32
13
33
14
34
15
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
-Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
<%) 8
6
4 ;
/
/
I
1 *
/
4
..1
I
1 T ime, hour s
-------
TABLE III-4
- 10 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/20/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Secondary crusher
Height of Point of Discharge:in room Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: 1.5 hrs .
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 5'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: S
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; semi-well lit; wooden background
J
5 U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVE]
RAGE
0 P
A C I
I Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
p _ i.
Time
Opacity
SCl
Number
S tart
End
S um
Ave ra ge
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
1
08:12
08: 18
0
0
21
2
08 : 18
08: 24
N
N
22
3
08 : 24
08: 30
N
N
23
4
08 : 30
08:36
N
N
24
5
0 8:36
08:42
N
N
25
6
08:43
08:49
N
N
26
7
08:49
08: 55
N
N
27
8
08 : 55
08 :58
N
N.
28
9
09 : 04
09 : 10
0
0
29
10
09 : 10
09 : 16
10
0.4
30
11
09 : 16
09 : 22
N
N
31
12
09 : 22
09 : 28
0
0
32
13
09 : 28
09 : 34
0
0
33
14
09: 34
09:37
N
N
34
15
09 : 54
10: 00
N
N
35
16
10: 00
10: 06
N
N
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
[Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%) °*8
0.6
!
0.4 '
0.2 -
0
\
/
\
i
i
i ' *
0 1 2
Time, hours
-------
TABLE III-5
- 11 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/20/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Bagger
Height of Point of Pis charge:ln room Description of Sky: n/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: approx.45 min.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; light wall background
¦
3 U
M M
A R Y
0 F
AVE!
* A G E
0 P
A C I T Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa c ity
Humber
S ta r t
End
S um
Ave ra ge
Number
Start
End
S um
Ave rage
1
10
15
10:21
45
1.9
21
2
10
21
10:23
N
N
22
3
11
03
11:07
0
0
23
4
11
07
11:13
65
2.7
24
5
11
16
11:22
60
2.5
25
6
11
22
11 :28
40
1.7
26
7
11
28
11:34
25
1.0
27
8
11
36
12:01
180
9.0
28
9
29
10
30
11
31
12
32
13
33
14
15
34
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%)
Time, hours
-------
TABLE III-6
- 12 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/20/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: PrimaryCrusher
Height of Point of Discharge:In_room Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: _2 Duration of Ob s erva t ion: 1.5 hr s .
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: a pprox« 5 '
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Semi-dusty room air; semi-well lit; wooden wall
background
3 U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVE
RAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
J
T ine
Opacity
Set
Time
Opa city
Set
Number
Start
E nd
S urn
Ave ra ge
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
1
12:58
13 : 04
0
0
21
2
13:06
13: 12
80
3.3
22
3
13 : 12
13 : 18
60
2.5
23
4
13 : 18
13 : 24
75
3 . 1
24
5
13:24
13:30
50
2.1
25
6
13 : 33
13 : 39
40
1 .7
26
7
13:39
13 : 45
N
N
27
8
13:45
13 : 51
50
2 .1
28
9
13 : 51
13 : 57
20
.8
29
10
13 : 57
14: 03
25
1.3
30
11
14: 11
14 : 17
20
.8
31
12
14: 17
14 : 23
15
.6
32
13
14: 23
14 : 29
45
1.9
33
14
14 : 29
14:3 5
30
1.3
34
15
14: 35
14:41
90
3.8
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
|Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%) 4
3
2
1
0
Time, hours
K
A
f
A
i
A
\/
V
V /
A,
1
V
i
-------
TABLE III-7
- 13 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/20-21/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type oT Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Vertical Mill
Height of Point of Discharge :In_jroom Description of Sky: N/A
Wind Direction: N/A Wind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: 1.5 hrs.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; dark ceiling
S U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVE]
RAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa city
Number
S tar t
End
S um
Average
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
1
14 : 57
15: 03
N
N
21
2
15 : 03
15 : 0 9
N
N
22
3
15 : 09
15 : 1 5
N
N
23
4
15 : 15
15:21
N
N
24
5
15 : 21
15:2 7
N
N
25
6
15 : 27
15:3 3
N
N
26
7
15 : 33
15:39
N
N
27
8
15:39
15:4 5
N
N
28
9
15 :45
15:5 1
N
N
29
10
15 : 51
15:5 7
N
N
30
11
15: 57
16 : 00
N
N
31
12
07 :41
07:4 7
N
N
32
13
07:47
07: 5 3
N
N
33
14
07: 53
07: 5 9
N
N
34
15
07: 59
08:0 5
N
N
35
16
08: 05
08: 10
N
N
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
2 0
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
a)
4
3
2
1
0
I
i
1
Time, hours
-------
TABLE 111- 8
- 14 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: Vj/21/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge: Process Location of Discharge: Secondary Crusher
Height of Point of Discharge:In room Description of Sky: N/A
W ind Direction: N/A W ind Velocity: N/A
Color of Plume: White Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observa tion: 1 hr .
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 5'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: S
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background:Clear room air; semi-well lit; wooden background
3 U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
r y
Set
T ime
Opacity
n . i.
Time
Opa c i ty
Set
Number
Start
End
Sum
Average
Numbe r
Start
End
S urn
Average
1
08:20
08:26
0
0
21
2
08 : 26
08:32
0
0
22
3
0 8:32
08:38
5
0. 2
23
4
08:38
08:44
10
0.4
24
5
08:44
08 ; 50
15
0.6
25
6
08 : 51
08: 57
5
0. 2
26
7
08 : 57
09: 03
5
0.2
27
8
09 : 03
09: 09
0
0
28
9
09: 09
09: 15
5
0. 2
29
10
0 9:15
09: 2 1
10
0.4
30
11
31
12
32
13
33
14
34
15
35
16
36
17
37
18
38
19
39
20
40
(Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%) °
0
0
0
Time, hours
-------
TABLE III- 9
- 15 -
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/21/76 Type of Plant: Talc Manufacturing
Type of Discharge:
Process
Location of Discharge:
Bagger
Height of Point of
Discharge: In room
Description of Sky:
N/A
Wind Direction:
N/A
Wind Velocity:
N / A
Color of Plume:
White
Detached Plume:
N/A
Observer No.: 2 Duration of Observation: 1 hr .
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 10'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: W
Height of Observation Point: Floor
Description of Background: Clear room air; well lit; light wall background
5 U
M M
A R
Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
I Y
Time
Opacity
Set
Time
Opacity
SSl
Numb e r
S tar t
End
Sum
Average
Number
Start
End
S urn
Average
1
10
07
10
13
0
0
21
2
10
13
10
20
5
0. 2
22
3
10
20
10
24
10
0.6
23
4
10
55
11
01
5
0. 2
24
5
11
05
11
11
20
0. 8
25
6
11
12
11
17
0
0
26
7
11
19
11
25
N
N
27
8
11
25
11
31
0
0
28
9
11
31
11
37
45
1.9
29
10
11
37
11
46
0
0
30
11
11
4 6
11
49
0
0
31
12
32
13
33
14
34
15
35
16
36
17
3 7-
18
38
19
39
20
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%)
8
6
4 i
/\
Time, hours
-------
TABLE 111-10
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
- 16 -
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
10/20/76
Stack
Date: .
Type of Discharge :
Height of Point of Discharge:
Wind Direction: 29 0° NW
Color of Plume:
Observer No.:
30
Whi te
Type of Plant: Magnesia Prep. Plant
Location of Discharge: Baghouse Outlet
Description of Sky: Overcast
W ind Velocity: 4-7 mi /hr
Detached Plume:
n/a"
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point:
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point:
Height of Observation Point:
Description of Background:
Duration of Observa tion : 2:22 min.
approx. 100 '
160° SE
approx. 36'
Hills and trees
1
'
S U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
T Y
[ Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa c i ty
Numb e r
S ta r t
End
S um
Average
Number
Start
E nd
S um
Avera ge
1
08 : 35
08:41
0
0
21
10 : 35
10:41
5
0.2
2
08:41
08 : 47
5
0.2
22
10:41
10:47
5
0. 2
3
08 : 47
08:53
5
0.2
23
10:47
10: 53
10
0.4
4
08 : 53
08:59
5
0.2
24
10:53
10: 58
5
0.25
5
08 : 59
09 : 05
5
0.2
25
6
09 : 05
09 : 11
5
0.2
26
7
09:11
09 : 17
10
0.4
27
8
09:17
0 9:23
5
0.2
28
9
09:23
09:29
5
0.2
29
10
09 : 29
09 : 35
5
0.2
30
11
09 : 35
09:41
0
0
31
12
09:41
09 : 47
10
0.4
32
13
09 : 47
09 : 53
0
0
33
14
09:53
09: 59
0
0
34
15
09:59
10: 05
5
0.2
35
16
10: 05
10: 11
5
0 . 2
36
17
10:11
10 : 17
10
0.4
37
18
10 : 17
10:23
5
0 . 2
38
19
10:23
10: 29
0
0
39
20
10:29
10: 35
10
0.4
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
¦ <%) °'8
0.6
0 .4
0.2
0
A
\
vA
7s
\ /
\ J
\
/
»
U-
\ /
i
V
Time, hours
-------
TABLE III-ll
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
- 17 -
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Da t e :
10/20/76
Type of Discharge: Stack
Height of Point of Discharge:
Wind Direction: 290°
Color of Plume:
Observer No.:
30
NW
Whi te
Type of Plant: Magnesia Prep. Plant
Location of Discharge: Baghouse Outlet
Description of Sky: Overcast - Rain
Wind Velocity: 4-7 mi/hr
Detached Plume: N/A
Duration of Observation: 2:"05 min.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point:
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point:
Height of Observation Point:
Description of Background:
100
160" SE
approx,
36
Hills and trees
'
3 U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
Set
T ime
Opacity
Time
Opa c ity
be L
Mutr.ber
Start
End
S um
Average
Number
Start
End
S urn
Average
1
12 : 54
13 : 00
0
0
21
14 : 54
14 : 59
0
0
2
13: 00
13:06
0
0
22
3
13:06
13:12
0
0
23
4
13:12
13:18
5
0.2
24
5
13:18
13 : 24
5
0 . 2
25
6
13 : 24
13:30
10
0.4
26
7
13 : 30
13: 36
5
0 . 2
27
8
13:36
13:42
5
0 . 2
28
9
13:42
13:48
15
0.6
29
10
13:48
13 : 54
15
0 . 6
30
11
13: 54
14 : 00
5
0 . 2
31
12
14 : 00
14 : 06
0
0
32
13
14: 06
14 : 12
5
0 . 2
33
14
14 : 12
14: 18
0
0
34
15
14 : 18
14 : 24
5
0 . 2
35
16
14: 24
14:30
0
0
36
17
14 : 30
14: 36
5
0 . 2
37
18
14: 36
14:42
5
0 . 2
38
19
14:42
14:48
0
0
39
20
14:48
14:54
0
0
40
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
(%)
0.8
0.6
i
0.4!
0 . Z
/!
A
/1
v
/
V
-v
V
\
0 15 30 45
1 15 30
Time , hours
45
15 30 45
-------
TABLE III-12
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
- 18 -
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
Date: 10/21/76 Type of Plant: Magnesia Prep. Plant
Type of Discharge: Stack Location of Discharge: Baghouse Outlet
Height of Point of Discharge: 30' Description of Sky: Overcast - Rain
Wind Direction: 60° NE Wind Velocity: 8-12 mi/hr - Gust up to ^
Color of Plume: Whi te Detached Plume: N/A
Observer No.: 1 Duration of Observation: approx. 2 hrs.
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: approx. 100'
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: 160° SE
Height of Observation Point: approx. 36'
Description of Backgroundj Hills and trees
S U M M
A R Y
0 F
AVERAGE
0 P
A C I
r Y
Set
T ime
Opa city
Set
Time
Opa city
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
Number
Start
End
S um
Average
J.
08 : 00
08 : 06
10
0. 4
21
10 : 00
10: 05
0
0
2
08 : 06
08 : 12
0
0
22
3
08 : 12
08: 18
0
0
23
4
08: 18
08: 24
5
0.2
24
5
08 : 24
08:30
0
0
25
6
08 : 30
08 : 36
5
0.2
26
7
08 ; 36
08 : 42
5
0.2
27
8
08 :42
08 :48
0
0
28
9
08:48
08:54
0
0
29
10
08 : 54
09 : 00
0
0
30
11
09 : 00
09:06
5
0.2
31
12
09 : 06
09: 12
10
0.4
32
13
09 : 12
09: 18
15
0 . 6
33
14
09 : 18
09 : 24
5
0.2
34
15
09 : 24
09:30
5
0 . 2
35
16
09 : 30
09 : 36
5
0.2
36
17
09 : 36
09 :42
5
0 . 2
37
18
09:42
09:48
0
0
38
19
09 : 48
09: 54
5
0 . 2
39
20
09 : 54
10:00
5
0 . 2
40
[Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied With Time:
Opacity
<70
0.8
0.6
0.4
0-2
!
i
1 /
\
\
| /
\
\
A
/ N
^—V—
\
y
Time, hours
-------
_ 19 -
with the emission testing, whi1e the in-plant measurement s do not
always correspond with the source testing measurements. No opac-
ity measurements of fugitive emissions outside the plant were
taken during the study, as specified by the EPA Project Officer.
The in-plant opacity measurements reflect only the opacity
of the fugitive leaks observed around seams, edges, or collection
hoppers on the process equipment; they do not necessarily reflect
the magnitude of the observed emissions. For example, small leaks
around the perimeter of the Roller Mill were observed at the edges
of an access door. The apparent absolute amount of visible emis-
sions appeared to be slight; however, the emissions were rela-
tively opaque near the source. The plumes then dissipated rap-
idly into the room air. No in-plant source was observed to con-
tribute significantly to the overall opacity of the workroom
air—which in general was of zero opacity except on October 21,
a windy day, when settled dust contributed to generally higher
room air opacities in some locations. Some opacity data taken at
the bagging operation were elevated above typical levels when the
operator "blew out" the bagging machine of residual material at
the end of a batch. This practice constituted a very small por-
tion of the total time required for bagging a given batch of
product material as indicated in Tables III-3 and III-5.
The visible emissions at the baghouse outlet stack were
observed to be cyclic with a visible plume being produced for
several seconds every 20 seconds when the bags were subjected
to automatic pulse cleaning. At all other times, visible emis-
sions at the outlet stack were nearly zero. Appendix C includes
the visible emissions field data sheets.
-------
- 20 -
Particle Size Sampling Results
Particle size samples were taken at Baghouse Inlets 1, 2, and
3. Tables IV-1, IV- 2, and IV-3 display the results of the particle
size analyses on samples taken at these inlet locations, respec-
tively. Figures 1, 2, and 3 present the log-normal, graphical
plots of these size distributions, respectively.
Figure 1 shows that the geometric mean particle size at In-
let No. 1 was found to be approximately 15 microns, with 67 per-
cent greater than 10 microns in diameter. Figure 2 shows that
the geometric mean particle size at Inlet No. 2 was approximately
six microns, with 15 percent greater than 10 microns. Finally,
Figure 3 shows that the geometric mean particle size measured at
Inlet No, 3 was approximately nine microns, with 42 percent
greater than 10 microns. No particle size measurements were made
in Baghouse Inlets 1-A or 1-B, or the outlet stack.
-------
- 21 -
TABLE IV-1
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 1
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Characteristic
Diame te r
o £
Particles
(mi c ro ns )
We i gh t
(gm)
Size Distribution
by Weight
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
>55.4
1. 564
8.7
100. 0
43.9 - 55
.4
0. 066
0.4
91.3
34.9 - 43
. 9
0.755
4.2
90. 9
27.7 - 34
. 9
1. 547
8.6
86 . 7
22.0 - 27
. 7
1.911
10.6
78. 1
17.4 - 22
.0
1.979
10.9
67.5
13.8 - 17
.4
1.724
9.5
56.6
11.0-13
.8
1.517
8.4
47. 1
8.7 - 11
.0
1.498
8.3
38.7
6.9 - 8.
7
1.636
9.0
30.4
5.5-6.
9
1.291
7. 1
21.4
4.4-5.
5
1.035
5.7
14. 3
3.5 - 4.
4
0.866
4.8
8.6
3.0-3.
5
0.132
0.7
3.8
2.5-3.
0
0.219
1.2
3. 1
2.0-2.
5
0. 158
0.9
1.9
1.5-2.
0
0. 100
0.6
1.0
1.0 - 1.
5
0.051
0.3
0.4
0.5 - 1.
0
0.017
0.09
0. 1
<0.5
0.002
0.01
<0. 1
TOTAL
18.068
100. 0
— ¦
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 22 -
TABLE IV- 2
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 2
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Characteristic
Di ame t e r
o f
Particles
(microns)
We igh t
(gm)
Size Distribution
by Weight
Pe rcent
Cumulative
Percent
>29.0
0. 002
0.04
100.0
23.7 - 29
.0
0.010
0.2
100.0
18.8 - 23
. 7 '
<0.005
<0.1
99.8
14. 9-18
.8
0.014
0.3
99. 7
11.9 - 14
. 9 -
0.113
2.3
99.4
9.4- 11
. 9 -
0.799
16.2
97. 1
7.5-9.
4 -
1.849
37.6
80. 9
5.9-7.
5
1. 210
24.6
43.3
4.7-5.
9 -
0.552
11.2
18.7
3.7-4.
7
0.191
3.9
7.5
3.0-3.
7 -
0. 076
1.5
3.6
2.4 - 3.
0
0. 040
0.8
2.1
1.9 - 2.
4 -
0. 047
1.0
1.3
1.5- 1.
9
0.005
0. 1
0.3
1.0 - 1.
5 ^
0. 007
0. 1
0.2
0.5-1.
0
0.002
0.04
0.1
<0.5
0.0003
0.007
<0.1
TOTAL
4.922
100.0
—
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 23 -
TABLE IV-3
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Characteristic
Size Distribution
Diameter
o f
Particles
We igh t
by
We igh t
(gm)
Pe rcen t
Cumulative
(microns)
Percent
>43.9
0.014
0.09
100.0
34. 9 - 43.9
0.118
0.7
99.9
2 7.7 - 34.9 -
0.207
1.3
99.2
22.0 - 27.7
0. 544
3.4
97.9
17.4 - 22.0 -
1. 258
7.8
94.5
13.8 - 17.4 -
2. 148
13.4
86. 7
11.0-13.8 -
2.633
16 .4
73. 3
8.7- 11.0
2.601
16. 2
56. 9
6.9-8.7 -
2. 585
16 . 1
40.7
5.5-6.9
1.929
12.0
24.7
4.4-5.5
0.810
5. 1
12.6
3.5-4.4
0.230
1.4
7.5
3.0-3.5 -
0.457
2.9
6.1
2.5- 3.0
0. 207
1.3
3. 2
2.0-2.5 -
0. 144
0.9
1.9
1.5 - 2.0
0.088
0.6
1.0
1.0-1.5
0.043
0.3
0.4
0.5 - 1.0
0.014
0.09
0.1
<0.5
0.002
0.01
<0.1
TOTAL
16.032
100.0
—
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
80.0
70 .0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
Effective
Particle
Diameter
(microns)
10.0
FIGURE
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 1
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
J.
Q.Ol 005
2 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 90
Cumulative Percentage Less Than Indicated Diameter
99.8 99.9
-------
100 .0
80.0
70.0
60.0 i . _...l
50.0 j ..._J '
i : I
40.0
30.0
20.0
Effective
Pa rt icle
Diame ter
(microns)
10.0
8.0
b
FIGURE
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 2
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
-U-.
Cumula
tive
20 30 40 bO 60 70 00 90 95 90
Percentage Less Than Indicated Diameter
99.8 99.9
-------
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
Effective
Particle
Diameter
(microns)
10.0
FIGURE
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
1,-1
0.01 0.05 0:1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Cumulative P
20 30 40 50 60
ercentage Less Than
70 80 90 95 93 99
Indicated Diameter
99.8 99.9
99.99
-------
- 27 -
III. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Figure 4 depicts the baghouse whose emissions were measured
in this study together with its vertical outlet stack. The out-
let sampling location is positioned as shown on the 24-inch diam-
eter vertical cylindrical stack, and thus was sampled from two
ports separated by 90 0 , as required by EPA Method 1. Figure 5 is
a diagram of the traverse points used at this location. The duct
was divided into equal annular areas, and a total of 12 points
were utilized during the initial velocity traverses.
Figure 6 depicts the sampling ducts for Inlets 1, 1-A, and
1-B. Inlet location No. 1 is a 22-1/2-inch diameter horizontal
cylindrical duct, and thus was sampled from two ports separated
by 90°, as required by EPA Method 1, Figure 7 is a diagram of
the traverse points used at this location. The duct was divided
into equal annular areas, and a total of 12 points were utilized
during the initial velocity traverse.
Inlet locations 1-A and 1-B are bo th 4-inch diameter hori-
zontal cylindrical ducts. They were both sampled from a single
point, the center-line point, because of their small size. The
velocity traverse was made using two ports separated by 90® as
required by EPA Method 1. Figure 8 is a diagram of the traverse
points used at each of these locations. The ducts were divided
into equal annular areas, and a total of eight points were utilized
during the initial velocity traverse. The flowrate at the center-
line point was checked at the beginning and end of each traverse.
-------
- 28 -
FIGURE 4
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF
BAGHOUSE AND OUTLET SAMPLING LOCATION
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
24" 0
£
Plant
Roo f
Line
D
O
u
*
5
v_
Sampling
Ports
16 *6'
20 1 0"
Baghouse
Induced-
Draft
Fan
Clayton
Environmental
Consultants,
Inc.
-------
- 29 -
FIGURE 5
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
OUTLET STACK
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Position
Di stance
(i nche s)
1
1.1
2
3.5
3
7.1
4
16 . 9
5
20.5
6
22. 9
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
FIGURE 6
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF BAGHOUSE
INLETS 1, 1-A, and 1-B
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
1/2
XT
Inlet 1-A
Inlet 1
Clayton Environmental
Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 31 -
FIGURE 7
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
INLET NO. 1
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Position
Distance
(inches)
1
1.0
2
3.3
3
6.6
4
15.9
5
19. 2
6
21.5
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
_ 32 -
FIGURE 8
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
INLETS 1-A AND 1-B
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Di s tanc e
(inches )
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 33 -
Figure 9 depicts baghouse inlet locations 2 and 3. The No.
2 inlet location is a 9-inch diameter horizontal cylindrical
duct, and thus was sampled from two ports separated by 90°, as
required by EPA Method 1. Figure 10 is a diagram of the traverse
points used at this location. The duct was divided into equal
annular areas, and a total of 12 points were utilized during the
initial velocity traverse. Inlet No, 3 location is a 11-3/4-inch
diameter horizontal cylindrical stack, and thus was sampled from
two ports separated by 90°, as required by EPA Method 1. Figure
11 is a diagram of the traverse points used at this location.
The duct was divided into equal annular areas, and a total of 12
points were utilized during the initial velocity traverse.
-------
- 34 -
FIGURE 9
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF
BAGHOUSE INLETS 2 AND 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Baghouse
Inlet No. 3
!•— 36 " 24 ,l4
11-3/4"
Inlet No
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 35 "
FIGURE 10
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
INLET NO. 2
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Position
Di s tance
(inches)
1
0.4
2
1.3
3
2.6
4
6.4
5
7.7
6
8.6
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
_ 36 -
FIGURE 11
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
INLET NO. 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Position
Distance
(inche s)
1
0.5
2
1.7
3
3.4
4
8.3
5
10.0
6
11. 2
1 2
6
5
3
2
1
-o—
5
6
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
- 37 -
IV. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
All samples obtained at the baghouse outlet stack and inlet
ducts 1-A and 1-B followed the procedures outlined in EPA draft
Method 17 (see Appendix D). In this instance, a 47-mi11imeter
Gelman filter holder was employed for in-stack filtration, as
shown in Figure 12.
The test procedure for inlet ducts 1, 2, and 3 was a modi-
fication of EPA Method 17. The in-stack filter holder was re-
placed by a section of Teflon probe leading from the sampling
nozzle out of the stack to a 110-millimeter stainless steel
filter holder, as shown in Figure 13.
Particle size sampling at inlet ducts 1, 2, and 3 employed
an alundum thimble connected to the nozzle by a 12-inch section
of stainless steel probe followed by a 47-millimeter type SGA
filter contained in a stainless steel Gelman filter holder. This
sampling train is shown in Figure 14. Only the contents of the
thimble were retained for analysis by microsieving at the Clayton
Environmental Consultants laboratory. The portion of the sample
found to be less than 45 microns was sent to Battelle Columbus
Laboratories for further particle size determination by elec-
tronic particle counter methods.
All opacity data were obtained according to EPA Method 9.
Appendix E contains the sampling summary sheets. Appendices
F and G present the particulate weight data and the calibration
data, respectively. Appendix H presents example calculations.
-------
FIGURE 12
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN
BAGHOUSE OUTLET STACK AND INLET DUCTS 1-A AND I-B
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Teflon
Probe\
_ 4 7-mm
Filter
u>
00
Thermocouple
100 ml
Water
Inc1ined
Manomete r
Pyromete
Gel
Trap
Valves
Thermometer!
Vacuum
Gauge
Orifice
Me te r
Leakless
Pump
layton Environmental Consultants, Inc
Dry
vGas
Meter
-------
FIGURE 13
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN
BAGHOUSE INLETS 1, 2, AND 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
110-mm
Filter
Teflon
Frobe
Te fIon
Tubing
Pitot
Tube
Ice
Ba th
Thermocouple
Silica
Gel
Dry
Tra p
100 ml
Wa ter
Pyrometer
Inclined
Manometer
Thermometer Ives
Orifice-
Me ter
Leakless
Pump
Dry Gas
•Meter Clayton Environmental Consultants
-------
FIGURE 14
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PARTICLE SIZE SAMPLING TRAIN
BAGHOUSE INLETS 1, 2, AND 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 19-21, 1976
Medium Porosity
Alundum Thimble
Glass-Fiber
/ Filter
Teflon
'Probe
Te fIon
Tub ing
Umbilical
Cord
Pitot
Tube
o
t>s
Thermocouple
S ilica
Gel
Pyrometer
100 ml
Water
Dry
Tra p
¦Thermometers
Valves
Orifice
Meter
Pump
iry Gas
Me ter
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
APPENDIX A
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Clayton Environmental Consultants,
Mary L. Fegan
Harold P. Flood
Thomas J. Geyer
Richard J. Griffin
Victor W. Hanson
Gerald E. Hawkins
David J. Holmberg
Helene M. Hysko
Thomas A. Loch
John E. Mutchler, P.E.
Nathan C. Riddle
George M. Santorilla
Justine H. Schroeder
Kent D. Shoemaker
Janet L. Vecchio
Inc .
Laboratory Technician
Field Team Sampler
Environmental Chemist
Field Team Sampler
Project Leader
Field Team Sampler
Laboratory Supervisor
Data Processing
Visible Emissions Observer
Contract Manager
Field Team Sampler
Visible Emissions Observer
Laboratory Technician
Environmental Chemist
Data Processing
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Dennis Holzschuh
James Eddinger
Project Officer
Process Engineer
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
J. Howard Shafer
Roger Perkins
General Manager
Plant Superintendent
-------
APPENDIX B
PARTICULATE/PARTICLE SIZE FIELD DATA SHEETS
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
PROJECT £PA 7r^fC KaftnPs.'g Uc (p. CREW
Sampling Station Bq^lioose Date 10 I\<\ (l b Time l3'QO
Test No .py.pl,'m. Ivr.oev*^(° Pitot Tube No. IQ Nanometer No.
Samp 1ing
Point
Velocity
Pres sure
(In.H20)
DB
Temp
( °F)
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
Samp ling
Point
Veloc ity
Pressure
(In.H2O)
DB
Temp
(°F)
Uncorrec
Veloc i
(Ft/se
s-t,
3.So
*7
Q(o.S
\jJ-L
3. So
*7
lat,."?
S -5
H.oo
Zl
13S.7
lo-5
3.So
*7
IS3.3-
s -4
4,3o
$7
HO. (o
w-4-
4-. (0
m. 3
S -5
3.So
$ 7
U; -3
4.3 a
IHO.fe
S - d-
3.SO
«7
12k. 1
Uj — 9-
3.SO
<61
153.3
S - i
3.10
%1
in. 4
Uj - \
3.10
SI
111.4-
t3o.3
Stack Wet Bulb Temperature, (°F) Stack Dimensions M
A. Barometric Pressure, (In.Hg) 30 . Pel __
B. Static Pressure of Stack Gases, (In.H20) 3. *~V
C. Pitot Tube Correction Factor 0. 8
D. Specific Gravity of Stack Gases Relative to Dry Air l.Q
E. Absolute Pressure of Stack Gases = A + (B/13.6),(In.Hg)_
F. Average Uncorrected Velocity, (ft/sec) |^0 .*?> or 60 * F,(ft/min)
G. Corrected Velocity = F * C (ft/min) 644*4
H. Area of Stack, (ft^) 3 . I *4
I. Actual Gas Flow Rate = G * H, (ACFM) 90.344
J. Average Stack Temperature, (°F)
K. Standard Gas Flow Rate = I * » Z£\ _ (SCFM)
where Tst
-------
SAMPLINC TRAIN DATA T$
Company: EPA Tc^k 'A4 ~ £ft^p'/-o "TcJc. Co
Source Designation: tV,c;UoaSf D'SC.^a*-C»P
Date: PlfooflL, Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number: Pnv.-j.'culaie - \ I 6f ^ ) Probe Heater Setting:
Field Person: g J6} U Cg Nozzle Number: — ,Dla.(ln.): ' (9, ~ .
Filter Number: <;^fi - Z-fol - 44 6 4*1 Pltot Tube No. 1Q , Cor r. Factor
Barometric pressure ("Hg): * &4 Meter Box No .RftC-3-» Corr. Factor:
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO): — 3. *4
Stack Dimensions : ^*4 "
Plume Appearance:
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (7.) :
Condensate Volume(ml):
n la.
oTft:
SL3l
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
3CL
Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Galn(g): *0.7
Leak Rate Q.Q t 5 CFM at 15" "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Ve loci ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
C"h2o)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
r£mp
(° F )
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
Outle t
s-G
0
4.10
IS
°l 4-7.501
(sO
5b
L t o
—
35
1.0
5
ft-53
•4.10
"15
^ .50 • t
Sk
W I 1
—
35
1/8
s-«
10
$.53
4.3-0
15
953.5
10
5$
l.l4
—
3(o
1.9
\5
»:03
4-.3S
U
J(o
I. is
—
?>b
3.0
s-4.
SO
4.5 a
SSq . 5
7<*
i.3?>
—
3.0
°l -13
4.SO
"I?
i)
S3
\.£4
•
3b
9-
S-3
30
5.fe
S5
(o 1
1.14
3 (a
a.s
35
4.10
"73
<3-5"
S-3
4o
0
r-'*R
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
c )
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA T$
Company: EPPj IV^c,k %4 - FoS-U>vn MoTglc
Source Designatio
Date:
atlon; RafiUnuSg IW^cUq >rc.
10 laohu tp
liter Heater Setting:
Test Number : Ppy-l^r uIctLp - 1 3 of a) Probe Heater Setting:
Field Person: R Ji& ; MC.R
Filter Number: SG. ft-35
v. 5k
4.lO
SS
Mk
3*
4.0
10
lO:Ol
4.20
%3
100
1 • IS
—
38
4.5
15
lO'.Ot
4.10
<&
7
•j
iV
3V
Clayton Environmental Consultants^ Inc.
-------
ft I
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA 0-91 B ^ H
Company: E?ft \r.^k Easie v-r> »c To ir Co*wpa»\*-!
Source Designation: D.qc^a^P-
Date:
(0/3-0 hu
Test Number; pav.-t,fL,U{p.^ Cpa jjg * 6f <$-)
Field Person: R^G, forR
Filter Number:
SGft-atol -4.T
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : .l4
Stack Static Pressure ("H?0): ~ 3.4
Stack Dimensions: 9^ "
plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
40
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number: — ,Dia.(ln.): Vy
*9-5
Pitot Tube No. \p , Corr. Factor:
Meter Box N0.flftc-.3- , Corr. Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%):
Condensate Volume(ml):
o.a
Silica Gel Weight Galn(g): 10.4"
Leak Rate Q.Q \ CFM at \S "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloc i ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pres sure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outle t
W - (0
O
1*53
'4t 10
iq.9(o3
80
i4
l.l*
—
3%
3.0
5"
H.^0
99.?)
S(o
Ifo
1.11
3$
5 • 0
Uj -5
10
i,Vo*>
H.30
&5.4-
SS
1?
l.a-O
-—
3^
3.0
15
ft-OK
4.10
$4
0^.5
U
SI
l,3£
—
3$
3-3-
uj-4-
30
4.to
31.1
S4
S3
1.30
3%
95
4.fe0
S4
34.4
109.
\.3o
*8
3.5
uj-3
30
13-33
4.6,0
84
3S.3-
\o4
\-Z\
—
3^
3.S
35
13.^8
4.
S4
41. H
IOC)
l.^l
—
34
9.o
U/-£
40
IV-3}
3-%0
*4
44. (0
10$
l.OS
—
y\
3.0
45
13;3S
3.BO
41. b
10$
44
i.oq
3S
3.0
Uj-\
50
13.43
1.00
50. (0
104
^ S
o.st
,—
4o
3.S*
55
1?>:4-S
5.40
*5
ss.?>
loT
%
o.*?>
—
40
3.S
13:S2>
55.^40
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
( )
Clayton Environmental Consultants) Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA r 0.3~J$
Company; fc?R Task 3*4- Mcicwg:sir> Tc t r
Source Designation: ftci^nose fl,ScU(*vG,P
H
Date
to Ian h fa
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number: P^ir o U~k» -3- 3 o-P Probe Heater Setting:
RJG, Ktcft
Field Person:
Filter Number: SGft ~ 3fc>~l - 45
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : 34.1 *4
Stack Static Pressure ("H?0) : — 3.4
Stack Dimensions: 9H "
Plume Appearance:
Nozzle Number: — ,Dia.(in.); '/ft
Pitot Tube No. 10 , Corr . Factor :Q. ^£.3
Meter Box No.RftC- Corr. Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor; l"]t^
Assumed Moisture (7.):
_Qi3_
Condensate Volume(ml):
Ambient Temperature (°F) : HS
Record all Data Every 5 Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): IQ.4
Leak Rate Q. Q \ CFM at ^ "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloc i ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(° F )
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(° F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
Outle t
S- fa
feO
13 "-51
4.30
S4
55.^40
104-
U
I. oO
.—
4a
3.5
<*5
i&of
•4.30
84
54.1
104
no
1.18
—
40
3.5"
S-9
100
iH:3S
3. fao
8^
81.4-
no
44:51
^.faO
SO
Sfl.K
U3
ioo
O.H0
—
40
3.3.
ISO
i^-Sq
L+
73.IH ^
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
?/
\S
C7l.^<)
icH"
S
l,K'
$
"PW
rf--En>
Claytons-Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA A*r» - ^
Company: ppft T&sK 34 ~ ToJr Cov^frQ^vj
Source Designation: Bq^kou^fi ~Di<;<-Ur>vg6
Date:
'o/a/fok
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Numbe r : Pft y-f/.ru inip - 3~" Cv ao.P I o£ 3 ^ Probe Heater Setting:
v-fnlrl Poronn • J(j. NfCl? Nozzle Number? 1* .Hi
Field Person:
Filter Number : SGft-akl - (A 1«y\yv0
Barometric Pressure
Stack Static Pressure ("fr^T)": -3.4
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance:
Nozzle Number: — ,Dia.(in.): l/&
Pitot Tube No. 1Q , Corr. Factor : Q.%&
Meter Box No .RAC-3>> Corr . Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor: nia
Assumed Moisture (7.) : |
Condensate Volume(ml):
Ambient Temperature("F):
Record all Data Every
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): IJ-H*
Minutes Leak Rate Q. Q \ CFM at I.S" "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Velocity
Pr es sure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(° F )
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(min )
Clock
Volume
(ft*)
Temp (° F)
Inlet
Outle t
S-(o
0
K-Cs 0
4.0
&7
i.S
15
%
iS
4.3
3 b
loa.a.
SO
74"
1.17
—.
4(?
S-4
9o
fc.30
4.4
105.3
8i
-IB
1.30
—
47
1.8
as
*'3£
4.4
<33
*os. ?>
77
I.31
47
3.0
S-3
50
3:50
4.k
«l
u \. 4
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company: FpA Tgc»K. <^4 ~ EgyLei/^ Kagi^eSta TaAc Coynpn^vvj
Source Designation; 6a.<^Kouse Pi'ScUov^G
Date: . _ i- . i
(O I'M \lh>
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number: Pn wfe Iru t r>:k» - ?> CpngP 3 ^ Probe Heater Setting: —
Field Person: R^Tfej NJC.R Nozzle Number: ,Dia.(in.); \j%
Filter Number: S&A-3fal-4% t*±~l Pitot Tube No. 10 , Corr. Factor: 0.%aA
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static pressure ("H?0) : -"3)'4
Stack Dimensions: 94 "
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(*F):
Record all Data Every ^
Minut e s
Meter Box No .RAC-3-> Corr.Factor: O.qRO
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (7.) : \ . Q
Condensate Volume(ml): £
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate Q.Q I CFM at
¦a. 4
"Hg
Tr av-
er se
Point
No.
Time
Veloc i ty
Pres sure
("h2o)
f
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(° F )
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Vo1ume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outle t
u>- 4
4)0
4:04
4.1
%G
*3
n
1.(3-
4-5
1.*
fc5
^109
+.3
80
131.S
S4
n
1.18
—
45
5.0
W-5
10
<1:14
Hr.Hr
134.5"
%4
lb
i.&l
H4
9.0
15
4.4
SI
$4
ik
1.&0
-
44
3.0
Lu-4
v-alr
4.4
*1
lHO.7
*5
"15
i.a-o
—
44
%S
4.4
143.$
S5
15
1.20
—.
45
Uj-3
*0
1:3*
4.3.
i4(o.q
8:5
15
1.15
45
a,5
<*5
V-3$
H.a
i5o .o
35
"*5
1.15
—
45
3.B
U>-3-
loo
T-H3-
3.S
*1
153.0
25
i5
O Ak
—
45
105
3.5
SI
15S.S
S5
i5
O.Sb
4-5
Lo-1
HO
T-54-
a.fe
81
iSft.fc
85
15
O.T 1
—
45
a.5"
US
*0
Ifc 1. o
S4
15
O.T 1
—
H5
3.S
13-0
10-04-
K>3.4-i4
-7-3.3 1 1
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
y
$1/
J
s\\S
iod
/
4 to
Oav-cne^-iC rvessot-e cX Test/„ -
, . _ , | Clayton Environmental Consultants. Inc,
bat-o^e-t^.c at Test Ea4- aS.tfa
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
PROJECT
Samp 1ing
Test No.
/V'
-/
t.'./A
INITIAL ^
Station £:f
¦<> /
/ 1- C- - ¦
Date
C
Time /',? J~ c
{velocity j D B
Sampling ! Pressure |Temp
Point i (In.H2 0) J (0F)
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
Samp ling
Point
Velocity
Pressure
(In.H2 0)
DB
Temp
(°F)
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
... .! |
iy- i i A '/' I 75
/ -7
/ / ~ /
\ / .• */ i 7 :?,^/c- i
I
i .
1 /- >
' I ... , 1
I
i
/ - *'
1 . i
'A- 1 * h V? !
i j | . i |
i 7- ' I''' \ ?3. /Y
I
i
! / i /« <-
1 , >v
1
1
I
i
I
'/c
\ ^ | "5
—
j / - V /
• ; /. •;
'S
7?, ,-7
i
^
yc
s"t , 1
7v-vy.
v 1 /-¦ >
^ *-
sV
/ i /<• 7V
Stack Wet Bulb Temperature, (°F)
A. Barometric Pressure, (In.Hg)
B .
Stack Dimensions
c r .
c
D
E
F ,
H
I
J
K
Static Pressure of Stack Gases, (In.H20)
Pitot Tube Correction Factor & /£) (?. ?> */ Z
~ 'A 2-
Specific Gravity of Stack Gases Relative to Dry Air
Absolute Pressure of Stack Gases = A + (B / 1 3 . 6) , (In . Hg) , (SCFM) / / 5C/1
G DC - 2
-------
SAMPLINC TRAIN DATA
Company £P/l TA5/C 9 V
Source Designation; ** /
Date: ,n - 7 D --7 b
Test Number
Field Person:
P-l
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Filter Number : S £ A -£67—
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : g 9. '7 4
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO): 7. ^
Stack Dimensions: 2.3 A' -ZT-O
Plume Appearance: - —
Nozzle Number : ^ia. (in. ) ; 0, J
Pitot Tube No. / ^ , Corr. Fac tor : /
Meter Box No./^-^Corr.Factor: 1.002
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (7.) : P^O
Condensate Volume (ml):
*/. O •
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
0 Silica Gel Weight Gain (g) :
Minutes Leak Rate ^ OPS' CFM at /"Hg
2/y, 03
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Velocity
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("h2o)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Las t
Imp.
Gb s
Temp
(°F)
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Volume
<£t3)
Temp(°F)
Inletjoutlet
\/~G
o
/J.'S3
2.0
6>&
7>J
?o
70
3.-?s
—-
31 >
v-i
)Z'S*
M
7*
70
7, fab
—
«?
3t>
/O
ij- OS
(p c?
Sbl. 77
so
72
3.0°!
—
H7-
V- 0
y
/V
u: or
?7J. s 7
?7-
72
3.0*
42
4C.iT
y
¦zO
H'/<*
/- *
871- 4
73-
3. 7o
37 3
y
1<¦
/xt*
63
nz-?i
rv
72
a >70
—
C< 0
j
30
/!•' 2-2
/- >
60
237.31
*1
73
3.14
—
4 7
(pa b
3
jj;&
/-
bo
WL V2
73
V7
6, t
5t
90
& 3S
I. ^
fad
$ G
74
I.7X
7.o
1
p: 3?
1*7-
ipo
14
/ 7 £
4b
}
/J' 9J
0.7 5
6o
U
79
1.01
—
47
c.i
1
/j: W
O'M
50
CfO b. 0 *
3V
7C/
a. 7?
*7
5T?
ip o
/3-J3
?o$^n
,
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
( )
.
Clayton Environmental Consultants. Inc.
-------
SAMPLINC TRAIN DATA
Company ; ~7~AS/Z- ^
Source Designation: & /
Date; /G~ 2 0 -76 Filter Heater Setting:__
Test Number: /P^/ Probe Heater Setting:
Field Person: 6-/*^ Nozzle Number: ,Dia.(in.):_
Filter Number : Pitot Tube No . , Corr. Factor :
Barometric Pressure (MHg): Meter Box No. , Corr . Fac tor;
Stack Static Pressure ("H20) : Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Stack Dimensions :_ Assumed Mois ture (7.) :
Plume Appearance: Condensate Volume(ml):
Ambient Temperature (4F) : Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Record all Data Every Minutes Leak Rate / J CFM at "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Velocity
Pres sure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Di f fer-
ential
("h20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(• F)
Las t
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(° F )
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
I n 1 e tfoutle t
H-C
C*o
/y.Oe?
// 7
£>o
2'o
%?„ 12.
¦
y?
b
ya
,v;/°
hV
(p 0
9'Uz-
8%
JO!
9-sr
6
7<
/v; ><
L*
iZtf.ov
'?&
Z./7
/#. o
-z0
W
u<*
&o
9 ?
76
J?. J/
—
// /
3
JO
!V3°
h ^
S<1
932.31/
77
3,17
w
J
jv (i?
SI
V h>
%
77
2,33
£-( (o
/2.D
2-
/0O
1-7
IVQ.S7
%
7^
2.*7
"L
t&(
/
/•V
5?
£5?. 9?
7?
2-0 y
Yb
/?.f
/I#
iff'
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
\
(?
J
2. 23
J
V I 1 ' ,
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc. j
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
PROJECT 2.-/ T7.l'S- INITIAL: ^
Sampling Station ^'7 / A c r T
Test No. i, /:;r. . -7^-,.- -- ¦ Date/ c-' - / > * / £ Time /3 . / v
"v' > ' ~~ —
Samp 1ing
Point
Velocity ^
Pressure
(In.H20)
DB
Temp
(°F)
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
1
1
Samp ling
J Point
Velocity
Pressure
(In.H20)
DB
Temp
( °F)
Uncorrec ted
Velocity
(Ft/sec )
i- l-
/?". C
}'7c I /72,
| 1
! !
/
/7s iQS.Z'/\
v i V- ;; \"/c ! U i.i*
i '-7 I / ?t
i ,-¦> • / i -/(-
/ if C <-i
I
i
y. c-
/7:
i?i /' i
1
I 1
i
/
c?
A A j
j
: 1 i i
! | 1
l 1 i • :
— t | 1 //£• I / / "•L i
/
/' 7 7;v
i
c/
s-y
/ 7c
/ b ,:h / <>
i
i z .
j ; £/.
/ 7<-';
/ V s". -.' Y'
7.6
US
1
/' 3 7- - c
/
5. 7
/So
/ "> ~7 ~7
/ J> '' / /
!(?'!
Stack Wet Bulb Temperature, ( °F) Stack Dimensions
A. Barometric Pressure, (In . Hg)
B. Static Pressure of Stack Gases, (In.H20) — y £,
C. Pitot Tube Correction Factor Q , S
D. Specific Gravity of Stack Gases Relative to Dry Air /, O
E. Absolute Pressure of Stack Gases = A + ( B / 1 3 . 6) , (In . Hg) j2 j C?
F. Average Uncorrected Velocity, ( f t / s e c ) / "y £f, 7^6 r 60 * F, (ft/min) ^ (T2-
G. Corrected Velocity = F * Z\j2^ , (ft/min) Q $ 5
H. Area of Stack, (ft^) ^
I. Actual Gas Flow Rate = G * H, (ACFM) 3 £/ "7 /
J. Average Stack Temperature, (°F) / j- j
K. Standard Gas Flow Rate = I */^std + f E \ /cprM\ f) v -) (/
( J + 460 J (29.92 (SCFM) / ,Y / Y
where Tstci = standard temperature, ^ F
G DC - 2
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company: Jl V 7 .<.
Source Designation:
Date: // - ,¦
¦JL
Test Number:
Field Person
A-'-/
/ - c '-y
Filter Heater Setting: ,
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number : , Dia. (in,); , /<3-S~
s-rA-
/ -
£ /
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): ,$L '~ - it
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions:
plume Appearance: ¦ . - .
c ¦ ,
/ ' t-
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minute s
pitot Tube No. X:'7» Corr. Fac tor : , %3
Meter Box No..^v -y, Corr.Factor:/, OOZ.
Meter Isokinetic Factor ; /
Assumed Moisture (7.) : n
Condensate Volume (ml) ; /.. Q
Silica Gel Weight Gain (g) : / J?. ^
Leak Rate /¦. (¦ / */ CFM at /-y "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
r —t—:
Time
Ve locity
Pr es sure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
CF)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sarapling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
S amp -
1 ing
(rain )
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp(° F)
InletOutle t
O
o'MS
C? -> &
/£>0
5S
3 &
/.
40
3- &
I'-"1'
OS $3
li>o
7?/- 73
60
—
40
3. £
10
$:&
(ov
Ho
?&: / /
ye
L >v
—•
40
I-*
4:03
L>, (?
iio
7ctX, >c
99
6 V
A *7
—
ye
^ c
V'H
cj:os
/i>o
/0
%0i>~.00
OC
&&
A 3*
"-/£)
3. <7
3
3*
f}:>£
¦f. L
Hc°
9! OS. 1i
n
t*l
M7
—
HO
3. >
3
?h. 0 v
1(c
—
yc
3.(o
%
i/O
fit*
I*/
373*13
77
(at
I/O
X
9:33
1
, /
1^
—
£/°
3.*
1
^3%
q,d
I*
7/
O^Y
HO
3.1
W3
4,0
W-^7
n
7^
90
3- S
(p&
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
( >
.
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company : ^ <-/
Source Designation: //v {£7 & ~Z-
Date: /0 - 21> - y /
Test Number: P"
Field person:
Filter Number:
Barometric pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H2O):
Stack Dimensions
Plume Appearance :_
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number; ,Dia.(in.):
Pitot Tube No. ,Corr.Factor:
Meter Box No. ',Corr.Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor;
Assumed Moisture (7.) :
Condensate Volume(ml): •.
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):_
Leak Rate ch OjO CFM at / "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloci ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
C°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("h2o>
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(min )
Clock
Volume
Temp (°F)
Inle tOutle t
H-*
cj:<0
3' 7
/£?<
%3
7^
!>3x
4b
<9.0
*<
jC $
/bO
%£7. (?3
7(*
1.3b
4o
4-t
<
¦7V
iO:od
^ *
lk<
%30.b'tc
7
7o
C
3
(0: to
J, C
M3.W
7G
—
Vjl
4. £-
J
,0: ?s"
3.<*
/bO
3<-/&'0%
%c/
7<*
o.xv
z-
Z-
fD°
It): S°
A.g
l(fi
&Z-7A
XY
7S
o~m
**
3. X
z_
/of
/(J: >(
4-3
t&o
$11,01
SH
7$
l.ot
*/2
S.Q
I/O
/C:yo
*i.S
~ /
/!>>
>6
7?
/.OL
—-
Yz-
O
it
It
/bO
%s&. v?
86
/.
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
PROJECT EPft Tack * EavLevo Hr^gsia 7dcCn.CREW
Sampling Station Ta 1 Pai K)o. 3) Date
Test No. pwp,\;m. Tr&uP^i0 Pitot Tube No.
JO
19 life Time
Manometer No,
Samp 1ing
Point
V -k
v-5
v- 4-
v-3>
V ~ ^
V - I
Velocity
Pres sure
(In.H20)
3-3
3.0
1
a.is
DB
Temp
( ° F )
Jb3l
(o <)•
fe3t
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
sa.3?>
'00-.?
u.os
<>£. 0^
(°F) (o\
1 *(Tj" Ut60)* fvrir)' (SCFM)
jerature , & F
GDC -2
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company afA y/ts/c my 7?^
Source Designation; ^
Date: JQ -.a/ - 74
Te s t Number:
p-r
Field Person:
Filter Number: '7~C>Vt^0b?
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : £ $L
Stack Static Pressure ("H^O) : - 7.
plume Appearance; — g/J/ss
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minute s
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Se 11 ing:
Nozzle Number : , Dla. (in. ) : . / # g
Pitot Tube No «/£^_» Corr. Factor ' *JL2z3L
Meter Box No . £fi£~ % Corr. Factor; / ,qC~l
Meter Isokinetic Factor; /6 7&'
Assumed Moisture (7.) : J?. O
Condensate Volume (ml) : ^
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): ''
Leak Rate ch 00% CFM at / sT
"Hg
Trav-
erse
po i nt
No.
Time
7c loci ty
Pressure
(uh2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
CF)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp -
ling
(min)
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (° F )
Inlet
Outle t
O
ft: OO
#3
9s?*S'3'>
6?
3.37
.—.
3. K
J?
2*V
%
%X30
?(?
3-as*
—
*/6?
/o
% • /o
2.9
/ 6
vo
7t
3.30
—
vTC 0
i/-<
J<
%.,<
2.3
973. /&
?'3
7 a
3V
—¦
9£
S'-S'
V
zo
Sr*0
h ?
9S
976.9?
??
9!
2,33
—
30
Z?-S
'/
z<*
I tC
!«--?
9?/.ao>
29
72
sO
6"* $
3
3o
/ 30
/.<
9<
2 <
rv
73
—.
5>'d
0
3
3f
? jr
/<9
9<
% /3
fry
7y
he/j
¦
3~#
6-9
3L
i/c
$: 90
/- (?
9<
7 93.fr
iv
??
2-zc>
—
So
?.r
X
2. (/<
A/
99 7-/1
iv
7?
51?
9,sr
2
57?
S ^
/00L #^
3>t
X-7
79
2.C/C
&
/2,0
(pO
9. 00
lOH.rt*
'
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
( )
pi
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company: z^/P/l y/tS^ JZ. */
Source Designation; & y
Date: /0~ZJ-~7 {,
Test Number:
Field person:
P-A ,
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : .7 */
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:_
Nozzle Number:_
Pltot Tube No
Meter Box No.
Dia.(in.) ;
, Corr.Factor:
, Corr. Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Molsture(%):
Condensate Volume(ml): Jj. O
Silica Gel Weight Gain (g) : •(_
Leak Rate Q.D/Zj'CFM at j "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloc i ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Volume
(£t3>
Temp(°F)
Inlet
Outle t
&&
£>
vf
/oaL ?/
l?V
yO
3,V0
&>
<*/,(?
7<
9,J 7
3.7-
4*
/o&LAd
?
1:3i
h 7
>03$* ??
20
70
3. >3*z-
—-
%
5^ 0
*
h 7
it
to WAX
W
70
X-S <-
—
£3
/0t-,
/-*
V/
jd
$0
70
G
—-
n
&r O
*L
/(?<
10:07
1*7
iqS3»%7
BO
70
J? 3%
b
I>
I/O
/0-a
LS
*/<
h S7>X2
to
3-V6
n
7>0
I
ill
/on 1
1-7
/(] (>!- iC
zo
JO
2.3^
—.
*/£
7.?
j7,0
m-u
In/^Bifi
>
' ^
~d
jjjA
by#
{jSt
io7.%\
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
H4l
(/P7.V1 >
V!v
J
7/
2.10
—
"/(J
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
project T7uA^X4
CREW
Sampling Stat ion t-bOj-f/A-
Test No. Thj*f
Date
Time <^T-
Pitot Tube No. fslffh Manometer No. O ~i
Samp ling
Point
Velocity
Pres sure
(In.H2 0)
DB
Temp
CP)
Uncorrected
Velocity
(Ft/sec)
Samp ling
Point
Velocity
Pressure
(In.H2 0)
DB
Temp
C F)
Uncorrected1
Velocity
(Ft/seq) ;
7*1° I
1,0
&
36
Acnu 1
ho
4f
J
C? £""• £
' B / 1
/.*-
if
1 h$0
/'T-
tf
7 /rCO
3
ht>
it
*
l< 3
ir
f
ho
tf
hZ.
*6
7ft CO
i
CL
1
(/.
M
Specific Gravity of Stack Gases Relative to Dry Air tf$
Absolute Pressure of Stack Gases = A + (B/13.6),(In.Hg)
£*i.sci
G.
H .
I .
J.
K .
(ft/min)
>4ill
Average Uncorrected Velocity, (ft/sec) or 60 * F,(ft/min) *//?&
Fih
Corrected Velocity = F * C^J
Area of Stack, (ft^) , 7j
Actual Gas Flow Rate = G * H, (ACFM)
Average Stack Temperature, (°F)
Standard Gas Flow Rate = I *
'std + 460
+ 460
where Tst
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company; FPfl Tr>slC 3^- Fc.vb?
-------
GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES
EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY AND FLOW RATE
PROJECT CREW
Sampling Station / &
ll 3 .u.
4
3
u ~ m ^0
"* r ^
L U)U ^
where Tst(j = standard temperature, (,-% _°F
GDC -2
-------
-p
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA ^ = 0.4rC>3 ^
Company: £p£> 7c.siC 3*4 ~ Er.s-jpvn Tft Ir
Tc
Source Designation: KJo. t Pi Rr^Uot;se
Date: tolzillk
Test Number: Pqvt.'o(i(a4.P ~ 1
Field person: RJGj fjcR
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): 3%. ft %
Stack Static Pressure ("if^O) : -» 5. H
Stack Dimensions :_ 4 "
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number:
,Dia. (in. ) :
Pitot Tube No »S~tA > Corr. Factor : |,Q
Meter Box No > Corr. Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor; 1113.
Assumed Moisture (%): ^, Q
Condensate Volume(ml): •
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate Q CFM at "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Velocity
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(° F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Volurae
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outlet
CL
0
11 = 1 io
3.3
53-
lfc,4.43-l
(o t5-
to
i • 3 to
3-tS
KoS.L^
1 n C '
1 4 ^
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
/
~
<|. \ 6^ )
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
Compony: 7x^5^
Source Designation; / Jdm.Af'
Date:
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Test Number; (PS~~/
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Setting: —
Field Person" tC/=A/ Nozzle Number; ^ ,Dla.(ln.);
Filter Number; £r- n /? ft '0/ 5 6/?-¦*&& if/? itot Tube No. /? , Corr. Factor :
Barometric Pressure f"Hg) ; Meter Box No > Corr. Factor;
Stack Static pressure ("HgO) : — 7- ~£-
Stack Dimensions: $ H" X^/S?
Plume Appearance:
Meter Isokinetic Factor;
Assumed Moisture (7.) : J?.i7
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Eyery
Condensate Volume(ml): , Q
Silica Gel Weight Gain (g): g.
Minutes Leak Rate /),00 ri CFM at / <,
'Hg
/r
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
¦ ¦ / / J
Time
Ve loci ty
Pressure
(uh2o)
Stack
Temp
en
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("h2o)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Las t
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(min )
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
Outle t
0
//:/o
L°i
M.iM
C?2
bZ
l2.6V
—
44
V-<
V
7(7
S.3C
—
y?
r-tf
/o
/!:zo
a. i
71.
A 3
7?-
69
/-0$L
df~ ^
i/-z,
ZO
tr-w
a 9?
?3. '> Z-
7 CJ
61
/. ^2-
^.O
7<
1*0-5
7/
(0 &
/>57
^7
51 /
3d
irvd
$0.31 &
tf-6
i/.L/f
Lf
<70-310
&fO
4/
0
//<
/,/
7g
70
St.? 3
*?
7.5*
yo
ft:*?/
/-*
9% .£(?
ri
70
2-?3
f.o
*-3
yr
fl?&
A (p
%0
/02.7#
?Ob
hf
70
)H- 5?
#&
73
/»3 *5
0
6o
(l-U
US''i 0-1
It.li 3
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
G5
£>q
2. IS
—
Clayto
n Envi
ronmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Coaipn ny : f .'f A 72 <-/ ?>. ^7/7
Source Deslgnatlgn; M
Date: //¦; / St
Test Number: — /
Field person: '7 C-<.c
Filter Number; /-'f~ 2 - C 7 \ A - ^ V. /A*
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): y y, y.A.
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO): - c7. -
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance: --
Ambient Temperature (°F) : /-// ^
Record all Data Every Minutes
C> 7 0 ( r"VT> H
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloc i ty
Pr es su re
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre ssure
Differ-
ential
("H2O)
Filter
Box
Temp
(° F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg )
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outle t
//" ^
o
h'-'2y
*
j%l>
7/7-7 5/
"7V-
70
/ - '>"7
—¦
5y-
3.
l'-<
6- 6
17<
77/. ¦>'( *
77
/, y/
—
"'> 2-
2.
I - L'
/L
/- 'v
&*'?
77''/.. 7/7
7%
/7 77'
St
: y
l/-i
/•>'
/7/7'
10
' 7~
6 7
i?v
77/.. ^7
Zl
I <37
5"^
j7- ^
t-'-y
v. t
y- -•
/•v-y?
.'7'<7
/7o
?JV- ^
Z*
7^-
-77 y
L'- I
7 c-
/.<> /
'A *
I/C'
yj /A--,
£5
yc>
0 - 7' 3'
j77
^, > j
~ f
;/C
ji / '7
7'- 7
po
?V3J<
770
0. '70
-—
^ 7
I'--
-V
U; ' < 7
ft <
gr
vd
0< $ r
¦
'/r
«/- Z
if, /'/
^
/c <
7V7> yc-
?3
7S
L<-2
/(¦ //
j? ,
/ '>o
?77\ >;y
7/
L L-
/(.: +'/
75^ 7t 0
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
( )
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Filter Heater Setting: —,
probe Heater Setting: ~
Nozzle Number: 7'y ,Dia.(ln.);
Pitot Tube No* X3 >Corr.Factorsjy
Meter Box No.itv-/ , Corr. Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor; /b? S
Assumed Moisture (7.) : Z. o
Condensate Volucie (ml) :
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate £>. (¦/ / CFM at j "Hg
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company : £-/ /* l7i7^ V
Source Designation: ..
Date: /( / <7 - / t
Test Number: 7'^' 7 ZT.
Field Person: yyf-':/ ( i'r/
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions :
plume Appearance :
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every Minutes
^ - y 7 /- c r- 7~
Filter Heater Setting:
probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number: ,Dia.(in.):
Pitot Tube No. ,Corr.Factor:
Meter Box No. Corr. Fac tor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor;
Assumed Moisture (7.) :
Condensate Volume(ml): — i
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): ' f*/
Leak Rate ftp} CFM at & "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Vc1oc i ty
Pres sure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(° F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
ling
(nin)
Clock
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outle t
H-C
Oo
//¦
6. o
it'
S~i >»*' - \
/y j.>L L
5 J.
?X
/' 3?
?7
r;
' i f
C
/1: >
( 5>'
p*
/(
a
v y
C>c.
;v
// T y
C - '/
/ 7c
7^7 1
7 C
/~vy
•—-
yy
C- c<
'
/ '
/i ••
V
/7c
7(3.7tl*
**
7 s'
/. 7- y
—
'7(,
6, o
»-v
,y<
// !.'¦ •
't: ,
/ - "i
^ / '
/?<
7 c (-Vt
5
y~>
/ - 7s
*-/ 6
O ¦ 0
¦S->
U'
no
7C 7w
y<
—
l7(:
6 ¦ <>
A 6
i 7 C
'nvA-'i
*P~
yy
O. f j
-—¦
yc
/ 7—
//-^
7"
/c ^
*7
no
U>
7.> ("
M-o
JS'CJY
77
s~i
/_-)
0.
57 ~t
//O
n:/v
-i ^
/& O
7X7.L;z
*?Te-
o. % /
—
VC
677 l -
»'$L
//<
//;*
3' (¦'
/CO
7> <- '/(¦>
77
rn
0. ¦) ->
•
£7- c-
/*¦'
ji.iy
7S7- 0> 3
*}Q.O 7b
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
n?
?3
17
1,11
—
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Tr^
Am - I'^^l ^
Company: EPR Task 34 " £o_g.'bevr\ Mo.a^.M
Source Designation; Catlgc~upv Klc?. 3> X/s^"t
\ iCo
Date
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number; Pnu+,.V\P - I Cpt^e lof^Probe Heater Setting:
Field person: RTfc, Nr,R
Filter Number : ET-aftA-ft'S-
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static pressure ("HgO): -"T.%
Stack Dimensions: 10"
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F) : *-f 5
Record all Data Every 5 Minutes
Nozzle Number; — ,Dia.(in.); ^/tfc
Pitot Tube No. >9- , Corr. Factor : Q.SHk
Meter Box No .RflC.-X> Corr. Factor: Q.
Meter Isokinetic Factor: |~7l3.
Assumed Moisture (7.) : l.Q
Condensate Volume(ml):_
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): \S.4
Leak Rate Q.Q | CFM at < ? "Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Veloci ty
Pressure
("h2o)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(° F )
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
Samp-
1 ing
(rain)
Clock
Volume
.S
10
iff: 39-
1.95T
(oO
B4t. \
1S
a.Tt
—.
43
*3-
w-3
15
lS:?>7
1.40
Co 0
B4S\7
U
£.35"
^4
4.0
20
I5-H3-
I.GO
S(o
S41.S
^3
17
a.38
4.0
25
15.41
U15
SI
85H.O
n
1%
3 • SO
—
MS
H.fT
4-4
30
lS'53-
3.1Q
(oO
8P-
Vd I
4r5
5.5
35"
>5-ST
a. i5
SfeS.O
no
fa
3. Id
H5*
<0.0
14-S
45
i&OT
a.as
(dO
in
?>.3"7
1.0
5o
ia:i3-
3.45
5?
811.9
ii3
3.SR
4(o
S.O
ig-.n
3-45
53
883.3-
U5
.
4(o
S.8
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
H
Company:
Source
Date:
: Ef A TnsK 24 ~ PnrAn&ftPSic TcAr Co*^f»onW
Designation: 1\Jq. ^ fiq^KouSg To(e~b
10 M l7h
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Numbe r : pnv.j-jl'c^p C,'7.e( pq.^0 3 o-f 9^ Probe Heater Setting:
Field Person: R JC, . klCR Nozzle Number: — ,Dla.(ln.); 3/l k
Filter Number : FT-Pitot Tube No. \3- , Corr. Factor : Q.ftlfa
Meter Box No .RftC-3 > Corr . Factor;q ,<3%Q
Meter Isokinetic Factor: l^M eV
Assumed Moisture (7.) : 1.Q
Condensate Volume (ml): —1*4
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) : 3S. c>
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO) : - ~l. %
Stack Dimensions: \0 "
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F):
Record all Data Every
4 b Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): 1^.4
Minutes Leak Rate Q.Q \ CFM at \ 5
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Velocity
pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
(° F )
Dry Gas Meter
Orifice
Pre s sure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
(° F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
(uHg)
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Volume
(lc3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
Outle t
fcO
3.30
C>0
III
S5
3.31
Hi
T$
v-5
C.S
3. 20
Go
%<**>.fa
113
Sb
3.31
¦—
47
%2>
10
lfc-33,
a.is
GO
ass.u
n5
%
2. IS
—
41
<10
it-S3
Q.in
S4
in.!
*30
3. in
4b
'i9.o
l(o- 58
3.05
5^
131
100
3.04
—
4
-------
APPENDIX C
VISIBLE EMISSIONS FIELD DATA SHEETS
-------
SUXT-'ASY
UECOP.O C? VIS ISLE EMI SSI QMS'
Type of Plant
Company Marr.e Z
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company flame £T~/<" O /-^ Date / G / /Q / *7 ((.
Plant Address | Observer f/l^L——
Stack location ll„yf Observer's^
Weather Conditions .f\J /. /
Observer's"") , " .. .. ,\T~)
Location (U'M? ."Ju ? ) \?
7
TIME
COMMENTS
HR
him
St
.CC.-ibi
1 c
: ; : : —.—
o
00
uu
f-'
1 J
V
Jv
01
fj
tJ
V
N
, 'H- /
S. 5 - ^ 0 .
02
aj.
bJ
(J
o i ¦ , s
lv®r.-iAy ~ u, , y ¦ <.; ;~{
03
/J
rJ
/J
lJ
04
N
tJ
hJ
A/
•
05
tJ
tJ
N
%
06
(J
fJ
tJ
07
/J
ti
tJ
*
/J
•
08
tJ
0
N
09
V
tJ
a/
V
10
tJ
V
tJ
a/
t
11
fJ?
12
tJ
N
(J
13
N
A/
/l/
•
»
14
a/
M
fJ
A
I
15
X
u
tJ
tJ
. I
16
tJ
tJ
tJ
iJ
! !
17
o
rJ
M
1 1
18
tl
1
19
rJ
(J
tJ
i
1
20
tJ
tJ
tJ
1 !
21
A/
o\,J
•
22
A/
y
(J
vf
\i
J
23
a/
fS-
V
24
w
tJ
•
25
A/
tJ
?.
26
K
y
iJ
tJ
•
27
tJ
t j
o
A/
~ »
28
h
tJ
' ¦/
y
•
?9
a/
a/
(J
o
•
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name
Plant Address „
Date li) I (f 7 k
Stack Location
Weather Conditions A/ ./ft
Observer
Observer
Location
n(TWL, K&i ?fo/
JJ
A/'
fv/
•
31
fvJ
fJ
•
32
io!
A1
•
33
fi
A/
34
tJ
a/
35
N1
lJ
a/
k
36
tJ
rJ
fy; .
37
a/
^/
(J
(J
38
tsl
A/
M
A/
39
A/
N
M
40
C?
fJ
a/
*
WTT
41
tJ
ft/
U
a/
42
U
fJ
a/
43
A /
n/.
•
44
li
A/
45
fvi.
lJ.
/V'
•
46
tJ
fi
fJ
47
p
u
K
A /
.
48
a/
N
A/.
fv/
49
(J
V
iJ
a/
-
50
A/
,'7
K
*•
51
M
a/
a/
52
M
f/
//,
•
53
a//
a/
tJ
a/
54
a7
V
V
M
55
a,
K
!V/
'
56
a/
/vf
/t/
•
57
ty/
y
5J1
a/
f/
a/
59
tJ
J
a/
•
-------
Company Name^
Plant Address
r"
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date fO / / W 7 U
/
f
Stack Location
u-
Weather Conditions
Observer
ttS3y.AU.tM 9>(^)
TIME
comments
HR
mi;i SE.cc::os
00
15
30
45
/
00
u
a/.
J.
tJ
.
01
M
a/
fj.
A>
n 1'1
02
tJ
S'
-"i-i.11-:. 'S-'-L.^ ^^ 6
03
£
a
0
tJ
— CJz^LtJL^
04
a/
fJ
J
,ir'Wi t\ 1 i
05
rJ
1
u
0
%
06
5'
o
a/
07
lo
a/
5
O
•
08
c
sr
rd
S
09
tJ.
c>
10
tJ
•
fert*
11
0.
)0
iT.
i
»
12
//
H
i
*»
13
0
A/
tJ
A/
v . ^ TAT,, v'L* . vt^T C 0
14
ft!
a/
c>
' ' 1
15
o
0.
o
fw/
- 1
16
a/
M,
a/
i
20
V
a/
0,
a/.
1
21
A/
a/
~
a/I fJ
i
i
22
V
rS
tJ
o
i
23
/
if.
Ar
A/
24
sr
1/
A/
5
-
25
0
5'
_5"
/c
\
I
26
5*
0
ir
a/
•
27
a/
A
tJ
a/
i
28
a/
t1
fc
5
o
r
f—1
29
o
:
-------
. V
SUMMARY
P£CO?.D OF VISI2LE EMISSIONS'
Tvpo of Plant /ojU. /Wf:~-L..
T TV
/W:Sj/
Date
O
' Company ilarr.s _
Plant Address '
Type of Discharge STACK OTHER
Discharg2 Location 9m 17SLJ-
Hours of Observation
~Observer "7T -Loc-H*
Height of Point of Discharge S*JL
Observer's Location:
Distance to Discharge Point
Height of Observation Point
/o
/0
t-crT-
Partly Cloudy Other ^Color
Wind Velocity
mi/hr
Direction from Discharge Point
Background Description QJL^ /\^LDVkA
Weather-: Clear Overcast
Hind Direction
Plu.Tr^ Description: -
Detached: Yes No
.Color: Black White Other vjHUzT
• •
Plurce Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Funigating Other
Estimated Distance Plu»~e Visible
Sux.Tiary of Observations:
Opacity Aggregate Ti~g Q Opacity Opacity Acnrgo.ite fi.v.e 0 Onncity
m!A
0
5
10
.15
20
25
•30
35
40
AS
50
mm.
sec.
55
60
65
70
75
.80
05
90
95
100
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
i/Lv-
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date
Observer
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
_c4£.
Observer
Location
'MiLti'M) g M-)
Hft
MHI
SEC
c;:ds
¦ ¦ .- ¦ -I • — ¦ ^ « I — -¦ . !¦¦¦¦>.. ¦ »
* -f)'
30
00
/°
15
(5
30
/*
4b
/*
•
31
\o
i°
1ST
•
32
1?
1°
v>
SO
•
33
10
1%
10
34
Id
IS-
|5
M
n35
K
/<
IS"
36
1
If?
1?
(?/?
•
37
10
10
!<>
^0
38
&
£)
So
IS"
¦
39
10
IS
11
40
15
AO
IT
.
41
fO
10
\$
15
42
(0
ft
ft
/O
43
?/)
(0
IS'
lo
.
•
44
K
If
10
/•*
45
jsr
30
(5
*
46
)<
/o
10
(0
r4Z—
4x1
m
-|5
-|0
^ ¦
48
)0
lo
|o
/o
49
5
|o
/o
/o
-
50
yo
(V
/<)
/o
•
51
fo
lb
/o
AD
52
1°
ft
/o
•
—
43—
-f£
=£-
ao
54
10
55
ft
10
/o
10
I
56
10
/o
£
•
57
5"
10
lt>
10
53
h
IS
IC
15"
59
i r
0
5
s"
-------
RECORD OF \
Company fiorne A
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Oate _
Plant Address
Stack Location
SL aj.jL jjjf~
Observer
Weather Conditions
NjA
Observer's
Location
A
H'jo
. TIME
• - COMMENTS
FIT
HI (J
-Ccnoi
1
00
UU
5
1 J
1*
ou
10
H3
10
-
01
<
|0
10
<
03
5"
1
5
y
10
04
5"
t
-------
su:-:-*A3Y
RECOaO OF Y2SI2LE EMISSIONS'
Type of Plant (
Date • |0||qf"7l ~\ Actrv^
Observer's Location:
/
It
\rfktr
Distance to Discharge Point
Height of Observation Point
Direction from Discharge Point •
Background Description /l^wi
-------
~h?t
jc 10;
)0 i-X-
'fTJ*
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name L
Plant Address
Is
L.
7
Dote
Observer
MUS,
7L~J±Jn
•7 ~
u
Stack Location
- g ¦>
kf.* jtf't.
Weather Conditions
M.
V
0:
'— 7\ia-ji \
-------
Company Kame _
Plant Address _
Stack Location
RECORD OF VISIBLE EHISS.OMS
A\~~>tvySLi^~*-' Date
/{/z.d/ 7 6
Si v!
Observer
Weather Conditions
Observer
Location1
(+(<**&
TIME
coyj-iEfrrs
HR_
MIU
secc::ds
00
15
30
45
f
m
a/
A/
hi
0
.
01
o
0
r
02
0
5
/^?
\0
03
r
/
-------
.-v •
SUGARY
ftECOP.O OF YISI2LE EMISSIONS'
-f~ -
Type of Plant
'Company Nar^e
Plant Address ; .
Date
itf-Lo/nj
Type of Discharge STACK OTHER T/te~cz<.o
Discharge Location Si !>!Lt
Hours of Observation /- *>"
~Observer ( *
Height of Point of Discharge $/?
Observer's Location:
r-7
Distance to Discharge Point ^5
Height of Observation Point I-
_S1
Direction from Discharge Point
Background Description Qsuti /UhysA fVu
Weather-: Clear Overcast Partly Cloudy Other
Wind Direction Wind Velocity
Plu.r^ Description: -
Detached: Yes No
rer \M£ir
- ujet!ljfct~' u/STg&x; Ai^Jic
Color
mi/hr
Color: Black White
Othc
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Funigating Other .ft
Estimated Distance Plu^e Visible
Stntvnary of Observations:
Opacitv Agoreaata Tire 0 Qgacitv
ju/A
0
5
10
.15
20
25
•30
35
40
45
50
min.
sec.
Opacity Acnreq.Tte fi:.:o fl Onncity
55
60
65
70
75 .
.80
B5
90
95
100
-------
Buz-
A
Company Name
YtLZJ
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date __/6 f^°.
Plant Address
Observer
!<**-
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
-4A
Observer
Location
er's // /.J \
ion AajlaUsi<-
TIME
comments
HR
Mm
S
cc:;os
00 1
15i
30,
cs
0
00
tJ
P
J
•
01
\J
(J
V
02
(J
/\j
|J
N
~T),rU/*A 0 b '.I J l&iJt-J; P> o 1 L
03
It
W
04
IN
i
N
fJ
V.
•
05
P
tJ
"^A/
N/
1
19
M.
hi.
V
i
•
20
/v'
N
A';
1
t
21
.A/I ^
.
22
/
-------
Company Name ,kzA
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date I 01"7 C
Weather Conditions A///V
-m
Observer
6*.)
lift MIN
TIME
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
, o-
44
45
45
48
49
50
.I'D
51
q.'! I?
52
53
54
55
56
T*c_ ¦
57
Jl.
59
00
A/
£
W
a
M
U
N
a
N
E
is/
/
a7
AJ
M
H
&
a
£L
&
I
0
secc;:ds
15 30
It
K
U
vv
M
u
hi
N
E
A
AI
JH
$
i
3
a
3
is
tJ
*
sl
0
v_/
N
d
V
J,
N
t
N
t
K
£
'+
aZ
4
£t
u
2
o
_C
i
lL
o_
o_
G
T
4S
£l
2
hi
t
tl
N
z
M.
d
u
1
4
E
3
E
o,
tl
1
^ 1
2
s_
10
o
co:-"ients
JXfX'ks- AlA. JL^-y (
J
AV
3>
,rV»W. siAy/lusv^ (j***'J
S QjU? /.
) fW 0-/-r.AjT yg?„
J ^
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
- i
Company fiame
Plant Address
Stack
Ak
r
Oate
Mil
Z,C
Location
¦v/1-
Observer
Observer
Weather Conditions
. TIME
SECCMOS
a
s
a
Location ((A\ )
• " iZyi
COMMENTS
c/:i^ ' (L\Ui/7^ 97
> *
T
-------
su:-:v,ry
BECOP.D C,r VISI2LE EMISSIONS'
Type of Plant ( aJ
Company Na.T.e —*
Plant Address ; .
Type of Discharge STACK OTHER^ /Ng~C£-jL^/
Discharge Location %9LCT
e 1 ^ I H 17 ^
Date
Hours of Observation /.r.^
'Observer
/ o.Locft
Height of Point of Discharge CU AjnfXAs—-
Observer's Location:
/
^ cp
Distance to Discharge Point
Height of Observation Point
Direction from Discharge Point W
Background Description ~ /Utwicuyij fa-vNM. - \jS^rJnMusdll
Weather-: Clear Overcast
Wind Direction
Pluma Description:
Detached: Yes No
Color: Black White
Partly Cloudy Other
Color
Wind Velocity
mi/hr
Other
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Funigating Other Aj/f
Estimated Distance Plu~a Visible K) jA
Sinwiary of Observations:
Opacity Aggregate Tire 0 Opacity
0* min. sec.
5
10
.15
20
25
•30
35
<0
45
50
Opacity Aacreq.ito five fl On^city
55
60
65
70
75
.80
C5
90
95
100
-------
Company Name _
Plant Address
Stack Location
RECORD OF VISIOLE EMISSIONS
.. . f . v-' Date _
Observer
V. 1
Weather Conditions
V
£
Observer's*^
Location
CLcvl/J
/
' HR
MI?I
S£f.o:;ns
¦ 1 ¦¦ — '¦ ; - — - • •
00
15
30
45
....
3
30
A(
10
(5-
o
1U t3: fi- : kJ£7~)3J-35'
31
J
hi
o
5
' •
32
5*
o
•
33
a/
a'
0
34
A'
jj
35
K1
u.
t^
' / ^3 t *-/ / ' i"3 *.y
36
A-'
tJ
tJ,
N
-
37
IxJ,
H,
V
/ -
38
a/
;V
tJ
39
K'
uf
i
40
h
IV
Ay/
/J
41
A'
K-
/
tJ
42
N
/
v
fJ
fd
O^Jtx -
43
5
N
tJ
#
•
44
'hi
0
0
¦
45
0
t>
0
•
46
S
\5
0
10
47
*
io
0
&
48
0
c)
49
.5"
0
A,y
A-;
-
50
5T
0
*•
51
0
iV /
5"
52
n
v
A-'
(9
i
53
q
a/
.5*
A/
;
54
fj
<
o •
55
10
f\/
iJ
/V
f
D.-^vv \H\ o 2 ¦ sujfccf \H\M
56
0
0
o
/ft
57
b
A*
0
(V
•/-
5ft
0
tJ
0
1 'I^T? /u ^ H i. r' /?!
59
¦—
—
/ V V c ^ ¦ ¦'
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date f 6 jP^) /"7-^
Plant Address Observer
Company flame
Stack Location
M
Observer
Observer
Weather Conditions
Location CA j j sJlz^ (A- ^
/
tin 'i
TIME
COMMENTS
rlK
00
15
30
45
-t
00
A'
M
0
f V i //
01
A<
o
tJ
02
5"
tJ
5"
03
0
w
04
O
(7
b!
•
05
N
tJ
0
I
06
0
0
5
07
h!
tJ
A'
^u/.1 /£-¦' W.t9 ' (?< IV ',Z &
08
a/
Vi
0
5
09
o
A
jj
A/
10
N
H
'o
'J
<£ 1' f)- ' Li^
11
a/
r\
K
J 1 1
12
kJ
c,
0
A?
13
td
/v'
t-'i
A
14
N
0/
fj
p
¦
15
A1'
A/
K
5
¦
16
0
10
0
0
¦
17
(0
5
0
/5
18
T'
0
0
C'
19
S"
S"
0
rV
20
0
(J
0
21
0
10
01 tJ
22
0
P,
5
0
23
N
V
0
0
24
5"
1?
0
•
25
16
0
(J
<
\
26
0
h!
0
•
27
0
15
10
.5"
28
0
0
5
0
•
-------
SU:"-A3Y
PIXOP.D OF YISI2LE EMISSIONS'
Typ- of Plant
{(.iJlc_ f ^Qyb\M
Company Narr.e
Plant Address
c '
K
Date
e • loj^/nL
Hours of Observation
~Observer / » ^cc- fcf
Type of Discharge STACK OTHER purciui^
Discharga Location 9>/i \Jhvjfr*'
Height of Point of Discharge Qa
Observer's Location:
Distance to Discharge Point
Height of Observation Point
iA
^y
Weather-: Clear Overcast
Wind Direction
•
Plums Description:
Detached: Yes No
Color: Black White
Partly Cloudy Other
Wi nd Ve1oc i ty
Color
mi/hr
Other (jjM?
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Fumigating Other /VI ft
• 1 r -
Estimated Distance Plu.Te Visible fW/h
Sinwiary of Observations:
»- • •
Opacity Aqoreante Tire Q Opacity Opacity Acpreo.itg fi.v.g ft Opacity
0
5
10
.15
20
25
•30
35
40
45
50
mm.
sec.
55
60
65
70
75
.80
C5
90
95
100
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date
Company fl^me
Observer
Observer's | f ~
Location
Plant Address _
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
TIME
W'.S7 .0
05
08
-------
Company Name
Plant Address _
Stack Location
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS .
D,jte \Q!$- Of 7b
VJeather Conditions
Observer
Observer's
Location!
4?
HR
1 -p
MIfl
30
00
w
SEC
15
U,
,c;:ds
30
,
45
31
M
V
¦M
K
32
V,
i\j
U
V
•
33
'J
V
fJ/
rt
34
I
V,
tJ,
35
M
i)
a/
\
36
V,
A j
tJ,
37
V
Pi
/J,
38
u
M
¦ • ¦ ¦
39
t"
Ay
H
40
u
V
iJ(
.
41
k
M
Pt
M
42
V
V)
V
i
43
fj
P
rJi
•
44
V
(U
a/
J.
45
h
/
r
tJ
•
46
K
H
AIf
tJ
47
fJ
N
(J.
-
48
A/
|J
kJ.
kJ
49
M
A/',
a/.
A/
.
50
J
•
51
U
h
k
M
52
rJ
1
53
Id,
A/
/
aI
A/
•*
54
N
H
55
{J
V
1
56
A,
k
a/,
.
57
/j
a/
vf
on
/
y
fJ
59
If
t!
f'
*
-------
Ol*Ml
Company fizm'
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
iiane ^ Date
T
Stack Location
Observer
/
Weather Conditions
Observer's/
Location I
CU
. TIME
• - COMMENTS
m
HItl
a
.Ccrio?
!
00
1 ^
a/
y
Ad ;
V
1
7
01
R
A^/
y
STSV <<£? /y~;rf ¦
02
fy
N,
QaSaZt^y/sv Q 1 :v/
03
hj
A/
hJ(
/ r v^> -. -.
04
aJ
aJ
a//
05
a/
06
K
tJ
y
4/
07
n
hJj
a/
a/
#-
08
K
P
A/
V
09
y
AJ
/V
l\j 1
10
tJ
K
*
11
|J
1^!
I
•
12
k
u>
a/
rJ
i
13
n!
aJ
'
U
»
14
iJ
A/
(J.
1
15
n
N
'P,
. i
16
y
Mi
a/
i
17
K
V
a/
1
18
N
/V
A(
A I
1
19
N\
a/
A/
«
20
(j
A/
1
•
21
A!
y
a/
22
y
jf/./*" Ab ^ 1
"Vt-'U /Xs-^VrMsTM/-) _
23
M
y
y
.1 }
24
/!/'
a/
•
25
N,
y
M
/l/
26
rJ,
d)
y
•
27
n/l
y
a/
y,
•
1
28
y
a/
y
r
29
*/
a/
a/
•
r
-------
SUMMARY
P£COP.O OF VISI2LE EMISSIONS'
Type of Plant / a JLc. Date loj Zj j "7 C
Company Harr.e Mc^j.pc ' Hours of Observation Lo M~/2-
Plant Address • *. ^Observer ~TZ Co ,:3
Height of Observation Point "fj&er\^
(\J
Direction from Discharge Point 5 , ¦
Background Description C^Ll/v ¦A
-------
ft#)
Company flame
Plant Address
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
^ Date
10/W,
Observer
uj£-
Observer
Location
ion
ITD™
TIME
COMMENTS
00
15
30
45
/
o
00
0
fJ
N
(/C47ZJVVL ^1>Z>
01
J
(J
y
r.
w*-***LsP) " - "M) (Ltp.'Kiis**—^ i rf. |
02
a/
N
l
ro
' ^ 0
03
r1
' i
i,
n'
04
A/
A'
a'
•
05
h!
f'
Ny
0
»
06
V
O
0
07
A'
rJ
t
tsl
V
•
08
a;
N1
\J
tJ
09
A
cj
'
y
/V/
10
A'
Ni
fJ,
A'
11
f*
A'
A1
12
/\!
h!
iJ
tJ
13
'd
W
«
1
14
a/
r
0
i
15
a/
?
fj
A)
. |
16
rJ
ti
rJ
17
5
N
H
18
*
o.
tJ
19
;/
fi
a)
h
•
20
o
a/:
21
w
ft,
n a/
1
22
/v
/\
•
23
W
24
V
rl
fs/
A1
-
25
o
N
A'/
26
i\l
0
A'
•
27
/n/
5
s
S
^ (¦ 0>-\a' /v/Jc. c" Avu^-aa-X/^ . .\/r
28
f\]
0
l\/
rJ
5 j j o
?9
rJ
r\
V
rJ
S'ur^ V ro ¦
LX7
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
Stack
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date
Location ^a(Pj
Weather Conditions Aj\A~
Observer
Observer'
Location
c?;
HR
MIN
seconds
— —.. —¦ — — • — # «
00
15
30
4S
• P"
30
a/
(9
o
/\!
\izM^r~ ?¦> i^/
31
fj
is)
tJ
32
-? ^C. iMl,^ <* .
-------
1 SUK'ASY
RECOP.O OF YISI2LE EMISSIONS
f(xJ(y f KL?v\jCXDate •
y • Hours of Observation
Typs of Plant Date
* Company liame <^[si3k~/ia^..,
Plant Address ; . " 'Observer ; ~
Type of Discharge STACK OTHER
Dischargs Location Sk. ?(Lt
Height of Point of Discharge % fUlxP^-—'
Observer's Location: . . !
i
. Distance to Discharge Point» ^ / Q
Height of Observation Point ^ fA.
Direction from Discharge Point • \J
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Funigating Other
Estimated Distance Plurne Visible zWA
Sunvnary of Observations:
9 *
Opacity Aggregate Tire 0 Opacity 0p3citv Aggregate fiv.2 fl Qnncity
0* inin. sec. 55
5 60
10 '65
.15 - 70
20 75
25 .80
•30 - C5
35 90
<0 95
45 . 100
50 • ' '
-------
HK"
Company Name ( s(
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date
It
Stack Location
Observer
Weather Conditions
14&
Observer*
Location
7/^C
*rr
¦)—N-
TIME
TfTTTi secc::os
COMMENTS
00
15
30
•15
\o,cn jq
00
aZ
AL
u
N
01
M
N
hl
o
02
E
¥
o
03
M
U.
o
z
jt
04
a/
M
A
05
hL
AL
d
06
tL
P
¦N
d
U
K
St-.-f (<0 le uf • i o •. < t>
07
Ai
d
M.
M,
08
-Ai
/V
09
h
%
N
hL
10
£
hL
J5
n
0
0
Q
M
12
j^Z.
13
¦ft
14
£
y
n
a/
( O'rVy
v'VvW
15
/szj
si
I
C ¦ yg; /,-X^r /(> :
¦ I
16
N
AL
<3Zf toi*7 ¦ Q.JGZ1- (/> :
-------
Company Name _
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date
lolxihL
Observer
rT—yjsj ,
Stack Location xVi V t^/vY
Weather Conditions
Ai
•£l
Observer
Locat
HR
flit)
TIP
E
SE(
:o:;ns
COMMENTS
- o-
30
¦JJ
a/
77
ft
J
•
31
0
/
iJ
o
•
/
32
a/,
a/
-
r\
33
fiJ
a/
u
/(¦><- , ir.tf
34
fit
35
Aj
A.
d
k
36
a/
\J.
fJ.
3 7
X
//.
rJ.
A'
38
w
/i/
4
4
39
y
tJ
40
A',
•
41
Of
a/,
a/
H
42
tJ
/^/
0,
a/.
43
a/.
A/
tJ.
P
•
44
tJ
ij
/\J
•
45
il
J
a/
a
•
46
fJ
0
0
O
47
0
0,
A/
A/
. ¦
48
fJ
AJ
5
-------
APPENDIX D
EPA DRAFT METHOD 17
-------
EPA DRAFT METHOD 17
Method 17—OznaamtaTso** or PAxricuUTB
EMISSIONS Tsom STATIOlfABT SotWCSS (IK-
¦ ST»«S FliTCATtOJ* M3THOO)
Introduction. Particulate matter is not an
absolute quantity; rattier 15 la a -vatiabl*
which Is a function of temperature and pres-
sure. For this reason, particulate matter
emission regulations and/or associated test
methods must dafLne or take cognizance of
the temperature and pressure ot Filch par-
ticulate matter Is to lie measured. If tempera-
ture Is not defined, sod if tee eSect of "tem-
perature upon the quantity of particulate la
an eSluent gas is unknown, then tho par-
ticulate emission regulation m»7 be variable.
Tho range of pressure whlcS. exist frvm source
to source is ot negligible iraoortacce.
In Msthod 5, 250* P Is established cs a
nominal rsferen.ce temperature. Thus, where
Method 5 13 specified under an applicable
subpart, particulate matter Is defined with
respect to temperature. In order to maintain
tbls indicated temperature, Method 0 in-
cludes a heated glass sample probe and »
heated filter holder. This equipment is cum-
bersome and requires care la Its operation.
Therefore, where particulars matter concen-
trations (o?er the normal range of tesapera-
ture associated with a specified source cate-
gory) ore known to bd independent of tem-
perature, It is desirable to eliminate the glass
-------
PROPOSED RULES
tared glass weighing dish and desiccate for
24 hours In a deal oca tor containing anhy-
drous calcium sulfate. Weight to a constant
weight and report the results to the nearest
OJ nog. For purposes of this section 4.8. the
term "constant weight** means a difference
of no more than 0.6 mg or 1 % of total weight
less tare weight, whichever is greater,-be-
tween two consecutive weighings, with no
less *>""» 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings and no more than 2 minutes ex-
posure to the laboratory atmosphere (must
be less than 60% relative humidity) during
weighing.
Plant.
Date.
Run No.
Relative Humidity.
Amount liquid lost during transport
Acetone blank volume, ml
Acetone wash volume, ml
Acetone blank concentration, mg/g (equation 17-4).
Acetone wash blank, mg (equation 17-5)___ ... ..
CONTAINER
NUMBER
WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE COLLECTED,
mg
FINAL WEIGHT
TARE WEIGHT .
WEIGHT GAIN
1
2
TOTAL
X
Less acetone blank
Weight of particulate matter
-
VOLUME OF LIQUID
WATER COLLECTED
CONDENSATE
VOLUME,
ml
SILICA GEL
WEIGHT.
9
FINAL
INITIAL
LIQUID COLLECTED
-
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
g* ml
CONVERT WEIGHT OF WATER TO VOLUME BV DIVIDING TOTAL WEIGHT
INCREASE BY DENSITY OF WATER (1g/ml)
INCREASE, g ; VQLUME WATER( ^
1 g/ml
Figure 17-4. Analytical data
FEOEKAL OTCtSTE*. VOL 41. NO. 187—F*U>AY. SEJTEMKft 24, 197*
-------
42026
PROPOSED RULES
Container No. 3. Note level of liquid In con-
tainer and confirm on analysis sheet whether
or not leakage occurred during transport.
Measure the liquid In this container either
volumetrtcally to ±1 ml or gravimetrlcaUy to
±rf).6 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250
ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate
for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight.
Report the results to the nearest 0.1 rag.
Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel
to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step
may be conducted In the field.
"Acetone Blank" Container, Measure ace-
tone In this container either volumetrically
or gravlmetrlcally. Transfer the acetone to
a tared 250 ml beaker and evaporate to dry-
ness at ambient temperature and pressure.
Desiccate Tor 24 hours and weigh to a con-
stant weight. Report the results to the near-
est 0.1 nig.
5. Calibration
Maintain a laboratory log of all calibra-
tions.
5.1 Probe nozzle. Using a micrometer,
measure the Inside diameter of the nozzle to
.the nearest 0.025 mm (0.001 In.). Make 3
separate measurements using different diam-
eters each time and obtain the average of
the measurements. The difference between
the high and tow numbers shall not exceed
0.1 mm (0.004 In.).
When nozzles become nicked,, dented; or
corroded, they shall be reshaped, sharpened,
and recalibrated before use.
Each nozzlo Khali be permanently and
uniquely identified.
5.2 PI tot tube. The pitot tube shall be
calibrated separately (I.e., apart from Its as-
sembly configuration) according to the pro-
cedures outlined In Method 2 for Calibration
of Isolated Type S pitot tubes.
5.3 Dry gas meter and orifice meter. Both
meters shall be calibrated according to the
procedure outlined In APTD-057G. When a
diaphragm pump Is used, assure that there
Is no leak.
5.4 Temperature gauges. Calibrate dial
and liquid filled bulb thermometers and
thermocouple-potentiometer systems against
mercury-ln-gloss thermometers. Ice bath and
boiling water (corrected for barometric pres-
sure) are acceptable reference points. For
other devices, check with the Administrator.
C. Calculations
Carry out calculations, retaining at least
one extra decimal figure beyond that of the
acquired data. Bound o3 figures after final
calculation.
6.1 Nomenclature.
/U—Cross sectional area of noz>.',r, nii
B».»=Water vapor in the eos stream, pruportion by volume. ¦
¦ C.=Acetone blank residue concentration, m*/g.
c.Concentration ol particulate nu.tt'-r in stack pas, Absolute nverage dry gas meter temperature (see Figure 17-3), • K (• It).
T,=Absolute average stack gas temperature (see Fisurc 17-3), "Kp R).
T./rf=Standard absolute temperaturo, 2y3® K (51SJ® It).
V#=Volume of ocetone blank, nil.
V..-Volume ot acetone used in wash, ml.
ffa=ToTal volume ot liquid collected in condenser and silica gel (see Figure 17-4), mL
V---Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter, dcin (dcO.
f*=Volunie ot gas sample measured by the dry gas meter corrected to standard conditions, dsom (dsci).
V Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scm (scf).
».=Sttir.kfos velocity, calculated by Method 2, Equation 2-7 using data obtained from Method 17, ra/sec (ft/seo).
W, —Weight of residue in acetone wash, rag.
A//™ Average pressure dtJTerentlr.1 across the orifice meter (we Fisuro 17-3), mm TI.O (in. II:G).
p.—Density of acutcne, ras/ml (see label on bottle),
p.—Density of water, I g/ml (O.W/20 lb/ml).
0=Totfal sampling time, min.
13.6—Spedftc gravity of mercury.
60=eeo/mln.
100=Conversionto perrent.
6.2 Average dry gas meter temperature and average orifice pressure drop. See data sheet (Figure 17-3),
6.8 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample volume measured by the dry gas meter to standard conditions (2Qf C, 760
mm Hg or 68° F, 20.02 in. Hg) by usiug Equation 17-1.
V„,.,a) = Vm |^Fb-^+T3^j = gV. +
where:
¦ K=0.3&&5 #K/mm Hg (or metric units
=17.65°R/ln. Hg (or English units
6.4 Volume of water vapor.
Equation 17-1
where
K=0.00134 m»/ml for metrlo units
=0.0472 ft>/ml tot English units
6.5 Moisture content.
6.6 Aootone bl»nk concentration.
(jfy Equation 17-2
Ba,=
V„(mu
Km (atd) •\~V9 (ltj)
Equation 17-3
6.7 Aoetoae wash blank.
Equation 17-4
Equation 17-5
6.8 Total particulate weight. Determine the total particulate calcfa bom the sum ot tbe weights obtained from
eeatainers 1 and 2 leas tbe acetone blank (see Figure 17-4).
6.9 Particulate concentration.
f~t "*a
• v.p.
W„— C.Va.p.
e.— (0.001 g/mg)
Equation 17-6
FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL 41, NO. 187—FRIDAY, SEPTEMM* 24, 1976
-------
PROPOSED RULES
AJft Goaveeri0» fetors:
To Multiply by'
Of#
— th>
0-0283
gat'. _
lb/ft*.
15.4
gftt'
2.209X19-*
gat»
: ... e/m'
36.21
flJl Isokinetic variation.
6J1.1 Cafaxlation? from raw data.
100 T.[KVu+(V„IT„)(Pb„+LHI13.&)\ „
60 ev.P.An _ Equatwa 17-7
vbsst
K=C.00346 mm HR-mVnil-0K for metrio units
=0.00287 In. Hg-ft3/ml-*R for English anils
6.11.2 Calculations tram intermediate values.
j T,Vm(.unP.u> 100
T.utv.9AnP. 60
=K T-V¦
Equation 17-8
P tv9An$ (1
?rhere:
K—4.323 for metric units
—0.09441br English units
6.12 (Acceptable results^ If 90% £1^
110%, the results are acceptable. If the
results are low in comparison to the stand-
ards and I Is beyond the acceptable range,
the Administrator ma; option to accept the
results. Use reference 7.4 to make Judgments.
Otherwise, reject the results and repeat the
test.
7. References
7.1 Addendum to Specifications for In-
cinerator Testing at Federal Facilities, PHS,
NCAPC. Dec. 6, 1967.
7.2 Martin, Robert M., Construction De-
tails of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equip-
ment, Environmental Protection Agency,
APTD-0581.
7.3 Bom, Jerome J., Maintenance, Cali-
bration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source
Sampling Equipment, Environmental Protec-
tion Agency. APTEM)676.
7.4 Smith, W. S, B. T. Shlgehara. and W.
F. Todd, A Method of Interpreting Stack
Sampling Data, Paper presented at the 63rd
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association. St. Louis, Mo., June 14-19, 1970.
7.6 Smith, W. S., et al., Stack Gas Sam-
pling Improved and Simplified with New
Equipment APCA paper No. 67-119,1967.
7.6 Specifications for Incinerator Testing
at Federal Faculties, PHS, NCAPC, 1967.'.
7.7 Shlgehara, R. Tn Adjustments in the
EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube Co-
efficients and Dry Molecular Weights, Stack
Sampling News 2:4-11, Oct. 1974.
(FR Doc.76-27786 Filed 9-23-76;8:45 am]
42027
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 41, NO. 187—TR10AV, SEPTEMBER 24, 1976
-------
APPENDIX E
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEETS
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Outlet
Run
Date
NP
Pm
Pb
Vm
T
^ms td
v„
V
wgas
7.M
Md
P-l
10/20/76
12
1.11
29 .84
69 .829
85
67 .7
12.7
0.5982
0.8762
0.9912
P-2
10/20/76
12
1.15
29.74
71.795
98
67 .7
12.4
0.5840
0.854 9
0.9915
P-3
10/21/76
12
1.06
28.72
69 .132
81
65.0
18.4
0.8666
1.3167
0.9868
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
CP
V^PSX(TS+460)C
Vs
Ts
Tt
Dn
7.1
P-l
29
28.90
-0.25
29.59
0.830
46.203
6715
80
120
0.125
102.1
P-2
29
28.91
-0.25
29.49
0.830
46.532
6773
83
120
0.125
102 .2
P-3
29
28 . 85
-0.25
28.47
0.830
45 .794
6791
82
120
0.125
101 .6
*°^7i» vM
100 x V,
I H •
"ltd
M. • 100 • X M
4 \k
Wd • {IC02 1 {{o,f M"0 ~ *Hj) »
MW • ~ 18 (1 • Md)
V, • 1120.8,* Cp a / » (T, I UVf Or""®]
Vi
IjOH » (T, ~ <60) ¦ VB
SI •
'l * *1 * % nd "
N
P
Totil Mo. of Sampling Point!
Vw
9"
Volvno of Niter Vipor Collected
it STP, SCF
P.
Average ilrlflco Pretturo
Drop, 1(1. MjO
X K
"d
X Holsture by Voltra
Hole Friction of Dry Cit
Pb
Barometric Prctsure, In. Ig.
Absolute
X C02
Volum X Dry
*.
Voluns of Dry Gas it Heter
r^Oltlonj. OCF
S02
Volume X Dry
T,l
Average He tor Temperature,
X CO
Voli><« X Dry
*r
X
Volcno X Dry
V
ltd
Velurng of Ory tat It STP,
oscr
Wd
Holcculir Weight of Stick C«t»
Ory OatIt
V«
Total ILO Collected In lirjin-
gcrt and Silica Cel. «l
tu
Holeculir Weight of Stick
Cil, Vet Baitt
4 Dry tWndard cubic fcol it&$f, 29.52 In. Ilg.
* StindirJ condition! it^fc'F, 29.52 In. >1}.
• I
c
#
pnduct or tho velocity licid (ftp*) «nd tho obMluta
P,, Sialic Preuune of Stick
" Cat, In. )(<}
f. Stick Cat Prcitui"c, In, Kg
Absolute
Cp Pilot Tube Coefficient.
V. Stick tit Velocity it Stick
Condi ttont, f(**.
T. Average Stic* TcnptriUir®
I ..f
T| Hit Tim of Tut, Kin.
D# Sinpllnj Ho«l» OlwUr, I*.
t I Pertint luktMtte
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Inlet No. 1
Run
P- 2
Da te
NP
Pm
Pb
Vm
95 .891
T
m
81
V
m8 td
93.6
Vv
2 9.l"
V
wgas
1.37
%M
Md
10/20/76
12
2 .23
29 .74
1 .44
0.9856
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
cp
V^PSX(TS+460)C
Vs
T
A s
Tt
Dn
%I
P-2
29
28.84
-0.53
29.32
0.841
28.220
4179
60
120
0.188
98.0
, nts* '•"b * ^
• {Tb ~ «W>
•a-0f7/ * V„
100 x V,
I H •
pit
"ltd
~ V„
J"
*A - 1°° " » W
d 100
wd • llcoz* tJoj* (l0i * Wo* ~ (*» ~ IX2) K go
w • ^ ~ U 0 • Hdl
*t • nan.#,* cp * / k (T^r-uoy [tM
1,011 * (Tt ~ <60) > V
„.i. !
Vi
N
P
Totil No. of Sampling Pol Its
Vw
Qit
Volwwj of Uiter Vapor Collected
at SIP. SCF
Average .flrl(tee Pressure
Drop, In. XjO
I H
Nd
I Moisture by Volume
Hole Friction of Ory Cat
\
Barometric Prciiur*, In. Ig.
Absolute
t co2
Volixna x Ory
\
Volume of Dry Gas it Heter
T^dltlom, 0CF
xo2'
Volume X Dry
It
Average He tor Temperiture,
t CO
Voltme X Dry
•F
Voluno X Dry
\u
Volume gf Dry Git «t STP,
dscf®
**
Molcculir Weight of Stick (Us*
Dry Dalit
V*
Total >1.0 Collected In lifiln-
gen ind Silica Ccl, «1
^w
Holtculir Weight of Stick
Gas, Wet Datlt
0
* Dry standard cubic feot at F» 29.92 In. Ilg.
* Standard condition! at£,&*F» 29.92 In. If},
* *
® / A?. * IT. ~ 460) It determined by tvor«sfng tho square root of tbt
' 1 pnduct of the velocity head (&Ps) end the tbuluta
«l«ck tcnperatur* fro* each twpllnj point.
T|
®# '
I I
Stale Pftliure Of Stick
Cm, In. 117
Stalk Ctt frcnuc*, (ft, H|
Absolute
PI tot Tubr Cr«f riclint.
Stick C«» Velocity it Stick
Condition!, fprt.
Averts Stick Tcmptrittirt
"f
Kit Tint Of Tilti Mill.
Sailing Nonlj OtwUr, t»»
Percent luklMtlt
-------
¦
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Inlet No. 2
Run
P-l
Date
NP
Pm
Pb
vm
T
m
v
ms td
vw
V
wgas
7.M
Md
10/20/76
8
1 .15
29.81
71.159
76
70.0
13 .6
0.6406
0.9062
0.9909
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
°P
V^PSX(TS+460)C
Vs
Ts
Tt
Dn
%I
P-l
29
28.90
-0.66
29 .15
0.834
54.976
8089
160
120
0 .125
102 .3
'7.6S* l'b ~!" \ . 100 *
v- . IT ! m ™ V—
\lt '*-0+71 *
jui
¦nd ~ V
9*»
wd * l"°| 1 {Jo** ~ 'l«0 ~ ¦ Tffo
HU • Wt x Kd ~ 18 (1 • H4)
Vt • 1120.8,1 Cp X / 4Pt * IT# ~ 460) [?,' 1 Hi]
1.012 » {T, ~ 450) a V
„.J ! J^A
VU*Wio•> .
VI
N
P
Total Ho. of Sampling PoItU
Vw
0«*
Yolirvj of Vater Vapor Collected
at STP, SCF
'm
Average .Orifice Pressur#
Drop. In. H^O
X H
Md
X Moisture by Yolvm
Hole Fraction of Dry €11
\
Barometric Pressure, In. Ij.
Absolute
t co2
Volun# X Dry
V«
Volume of Dry Gas at Keter
C^dl lions, OCF
xo2'
Volume X Dry
T,a
Average He tor Temperature,
X CO
Yolt/ne X Dry
•F
xn2
Volumo S Dry
V_
"ltd
Volume 0/ Dry Cat It STP,
DSCF
*
Molecular Wjljht cf Stick 0«l»
Ory Oasis
Vw
Total 1U0 Collected In Iif)ln-
gers and Silica Cel, a 1
MU
Molecular Weight of Stack
Cat, Vet Basil
p
* Dry standard cutitc feol at£f}F» 29.92 In, II9.
k Standard condition! at^&'F, 29.92 In. Ilg.
• *
€ / if 1 * (l' > 460) Is doUnnlned by evading tho tquare root «f tKt
4 * pnduct of th* velocity liced (ftps) and th« tbtoluta
.1 - I. A >L
P.» Static Pressure of Stick
• Cat, In. Ilg
?. Stack C»l PrCMUi't, In. K|
Ab'.otute
Cp' Pilot Tube Crcfrielcnt.
V. Stick Cat Velocity it Stick
Conditions, fpn.
T. Avenoe Stack Tcmperatura
• "f
T| Kit Tint Of Tttt, »l«.
Dft Siting Kotilt 011*4 tor, t*«
8 I Nrcint luktMtle
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Inlet No. 3
Run
Da te
NP
Pm
Pb
Vm
T
Am
V
ms td
vw
V„
wga s
%M
Md
P-3
10/21/76
8
2.7
28.62
107.977
76
102
24. 2
1.1398
1.1001
0.9890
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
CP
n/aPsX(Ts+460)c
Vs
Ts
Tt
^n
%I
P-3
29
28 . 88
-0.57
28 .05
0.827
31.418
46 74
45
120
O .188
97 .1
-.M • » Tffo
IN • W( I Hd oa (1 • Hd)
\ • 'b i '.t
V, • S120.V Cp a / * IT, * UOJ [t*™]
V»
SI
1^052 t , ¦ *i « <°a>
"V4
7
ToUl Ho. of Sampling PoMtl
Avenge .Orifice Pretture
Drop, 1n. II^O
l Barometric Pretture, In. Ig.
Absolute
Volune of Ory Cat it Hetor
9 T^dlllonj, OCF
. Average He lor Temperature,
* 'f
Volume of Dry Gat it STP,
"«M OSCF
.. Total*11,0 Collected In ln>j1n»
* gert and SI Ilea Cel. » I
S H
Md
X C02
S02'
X CO
XH,
HIj
m
Volinvj of Waler Vapor Collectai
at SIP, 5CF
S Holt lure by Yoluma
Hole fraction of Dry Oat
Voluns X Dry
Volume I Dry
Voline X Dry
Yolumo X Dry
Molecular Kalght of Stack Cat*
Dry Oatl*
Koleculir Weight of Stick
Cat, Wet Datlt
* Ory standard cubic feel at 6$ T, 29.92 In. Ilg,
* Standard conditions at£&*F, 29.92 In. Itg.
* 4
* /aJ7"^nnT*~755) ti determined by avoragtng tho iquare root of the
* * pnduct of the velocity <>cad (tP») and the •btolutA
(tick teooeratura froet each taaollna oaint.
P.» Static Pretture of Statk
* Cat, In. itj
P. Stick Cit Prcuure, In. Hg
Absolute
C" Pilot Tube Crefflclent
V. Stack Cat Velocity it Stick
Condition, fp*.
T. Average Stack TcnptraUrt
> ..T
T| Hit Tin* of Test, Kin.
D„ Sampling Notzlt O'waUr, l»«
X I Percent IttMuilc
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Inlet No. 1A
Run
Da te
NP
Pm
Pb
Vm
T
m
V
s td
Vw
V„
wgas
7„M
P- 4
10/21/76
1
3 . 2
00
00
•
CO
CM
0.597
67
0.582
0
0
0
1
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
CP
VkPsX(Ts+460)c
Vs
T
1 s
Tt
Dn
XI
P-4
29
29
00
CM
•
O
1
28.60
0.99
27.604
4859
48
1
0.1875
62 .2
"»U
/76S* \
• (I. ~
100 N v„
J H •
<11*
V
BIS
1*'*
• <*C02 " (,0i * TOO1 ~ l,M ~ "P 1 100
KV • ~ 18 0 • Hd)
VM'.t
Vj • S12Q.B,i Cp a / aP^ * {T, 4 W) 1 w]
1,032 » (T, ~ 4CO) « V.
„.J I
V*
H
P
Totil No. of Sampling PofitS
Vw
91*
Volirvj of Witer Vapor Collected
•t sjp, scr
P*
Aveng^ .Orifice Prenure
Orop, In. KjO
X H
Hd
t Holsture by Volume
Hole Friction of Dry Cit
v
Birometrtc Prcisure, In. 1,0 Collected In Iir»1n-
jerj md Slllei Ccl, * I
nw
Koleculir Weight of Stick
Cis, Met Oitts
* Dry itindird cubic feot it6&F, 29.92 In. lis.
* Stindird condition* itfcfc'F. 29.92 tn. IVj.
* *
# /'if t» detoralned by evortgfng tho square root of tfw
* * pnduct of tho velocity lie id (tPi) tnd the ofculuta
ittck tcnperilurt frc-x euh tiopllna oolnt.
Stitlc Prtuvr* of Stick
** C«t, In. Ilj
P. Stick Cii Preilufe, In, H|
* Absolute
C ' Pilot Tube Coefficient
P
V. Stick Cit Velocity it Stick
(ondltlont, f(vt.
Avtrifo Stick TcmperiUjr*
"f
T| Kit Tina of Teit, Kin.
D# Sibling Kottlt DltwUr, I*,
S t Pmtnt ttoklMtlc
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plant Eastern Magnesia Talc Company Location Johnson, Vermont
Sampled Source Baghouse Inlet No. IB
Run
Da te
NP
Pm
Pb
Vm
T
¦'•m
^ms td
vw
v
wga s
%M
P - 5
10/21/76
1
1.36
28.88
1 .186
61
1.16
0
0
0
1
Run
MWd
MW
Pst
Ps
CP
VaPsX(Ts+460)c
Vs
Ts
Tt
Dn
%I
P-5
29
29
-0.397
28.48
0.99
41.104
7251
52
2 .25
0.125
84.4
7/»*„
100 K
S H •
9*»
M. • 100 • J H
* W
*4 ' (lCOl " TUO^ (,02 " ICO* ~ ~ "2J * T?0
W • Hlg * Md ~ W 0 - Hd)
l_1 1/1
V, • 1120.8,* Cp * ~ 4^ * IT, TMOJ [>,"* Hi]
IjOIZ * (T, ~ «&0) k V,
It »
««4
H
P
Total Ho. of Sampling PotltS
Vw
V»
Volu*a of Water Vapor Collected
at SIP. scr
'it
Average Arlflca Pre Hurt
Drop, In. K20
X K
Hd
X Hotsturo by Volwnt
Hale Friction of Dry Cat
%
V
Barometric Prcnure, In. (g.
Abiolute
X C02
Vol it* X Dry
CP
*.
Volune of Dry Cat at Hetor
T-^dl tlonj, OCF
Xo/
Volume X Dry
l
T,
Average Metor Teniperatur*,
X CO
Voline X Dry
'l
T
X«2
Yolumo X Dry
v_
"tM
Yoluma of Dry Cat it STP,
OSCf'
Wd
Molecular Weight of Stack fat*
Dry Oatlt
Tt
n
V-
Total 11,0 Collected In liritn-
gert md Silica Cel, a 1
w
Molecular Ualght of Stack
"tt
< f
Cj», Net Slllt
* Dry itandard cubic feci at&§F» *9.92 In. Ilg.
* Standard conditions at A&*F« 29,92 In, llg.
, 1
* / 4*. * ll. ~ 4(>0) 1* determined by avurigtng tho tquaro root of tha
* 1 pnduct of tha velocity head (aPt) end tha abtolutt
ilirk lmn»ituM frm Mtli luolina Mini.
Cat, In. H<]
Stack Cat frcitvict, In. Hg
Absolute
PI tot Tube Crefflcltnt.
Stick Cat Velocity at Stick
Condition, fpit.
Avenjfl Stick Tcmperituro
-r
Kit Tin* of Titt, HI*.
Sinpltnj Hotilt DlmUr, !*«
Nrcant IwkIk*tie
-------
APPENDIX F
PARTICULATE WEIGHT DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE OUTLET
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Frac t ion
F inal
Weight
(8«>)
Tare
We ight
(gm)
We ight
o f
Particu-
late
(gm)
Applicable
Blank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
96.3328
96.2921
0.0407
<0.0001
0.0407
Acetone Probe Rinse
101.9048
101.9011
0.0037
0.0008
0.0029
1
Filter
0.3026
0.1391
0.1635
<0.0001
0.1635
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
0.2071
Irapinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
100.7233
100.6456
0.0777
<0.0001
0.0777
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
0.2848
Water Probe Rinse
99.7200
99.7154
0.0046
<0.0001
0.0046
Acetone Probe Rinse
99.9463
99.9437
0.0026
0.0010
0.0016
2
Filter
0.4207
0.1267
0.2940
<0.0001
0.2940
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
0.3002
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
101.3505
101.3408
0.0097
<0.0001
0.0097
Total Particulate
• -
-
-
-
0.3099
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE OUTLET
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
F i nal
We ight
(gm)
Tare
We ight
(gm)
We ight
o f
Particu-
late
(gni)
Applicable
B lank
Value
(gm)
B lank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
101.9234
101.9203
0.0031
<0.0001
0.0031
Acetone Probe Rinse
99.2124
99.2084
0.0040
0.0010
0.0030
3
Filter
0.4037
0.1279
0. 2758
<0.0001
0.2758
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
0.2819
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
101.1451
101.1412
0.0039
<0.0001
0.0039
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
0.2858
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinse
Filter
Front-half Total
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 1
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
Final
Weight
(gm)
Tare
Weight
(gm)
We ight
o f
Particu-
late
(gin)
Applicable
B lank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
100.9417
98.1232
2.8185
<0.0001
2.8185
Acetone Probe Rinse
101.3016
101.2684
0.0332
0.0013
0.0319
2
Filter Catch
Filter
48.5750
2.7642
0.7995
48.5750
1.9647
0.0015
48.5750
1.9632
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
53.3886
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
100.2071
100.2048
0.0023
<0.0001
0.0023
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
53.3909
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinse
Filter
Front-half Total
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 2
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
Final
Weight
(gm)
Tare
We ight
(gm)
We ight
of
Particu-
late
(gm)
Applicable
B1 ank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
101.9851
101.5848
0.4003
<0.0001
0.4003
Acetone Probe Rinse
99.5624
99.2532
j
0.3092
0.0017
0.3075
1
Filter
5.8075
0.8024
5.0051
0.0015
5.0036
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
5.7114
Irapinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
99.4644
99.4630
0.0014
<0.0001
0.0014
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
5.7128
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinse
Filter
Front-half Total
Irapinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 3
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
Final
We ight
(gm)
Tare
We ight
(gin)
We ight
of
Particu-
late
(gm)
Applicable
Blank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
97.6731
97.5345
0.1386
<0.0001
0.1386
Acetone Probe Rinse
105.4183
105.3896
0.0287
0.0011
0.0276
3
Filters
9.6337
12.1777
0.8012
0.7981
8.8325
11.3796
0.0015
0.0015
8.8310
11.3781
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
20.3753
Irapinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
100. 1840
100.1819
0.0021
<0.0001
0.0021
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
20.3774
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinse
Filter
Front-half Total
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE INLET NO. 1-A
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
Final
Weight
(gin)
Tare
We ight
(gin)
We ight
of
Particu-
late
(gm)
Applicable
Blank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gm)
Water Probe Rinse
94.5653
94.5031
0.0622
0.0051
0.0571
Acetone Probe Rinse
91.3467
91.3409
0.0058
0.0001
0.0057
4
Filter
2.5018
0.1271
2.3747
0.0015
2.3732
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
2.4360
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
-
-
-
-
-
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
-
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinse
Filter
Front-half Total
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE WEIGHT FRACTIONS
BAGHOUSE INLET NO.l-B
Eastern Magnesia Talc Company
Johnson, Vermont
October 20-21, 1976
Test
No.
Fraction
Final
We ight
(gra)
Tare
We ight
(gm)
We ight
of
Particu-
late
(gm)
Applicable
Blank
Value
(gm)
Blank
Corrected
Particu-
late
(gin)
Water Probe Rinse
93.4885
93.3583
0.1302
0.0084
0.1218
Acetone Probe Rinse
93.1900
93. 1799
0.0101
0.0001
0.0100
5
Filter
0.6877
0. 1368
0.5509
0.0015
0.5494
Front-half Total
-
-
-
-
0.6812
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
-
-
-
-
-
Total Particulate
-
-
-
-
-
Water Probe Rinse
Acetone Probe Rinsfe
Filter
Front-half Total
Impinger Contents and
Back-half Water Rinse
Total Particulate
-------
APPENDIX G
CALIBRATION DATA
-------
Orifice
Manometer
Setting, atd
(in. H20)
Gas Volume
Wet Test^
Meter
<&)
Gas Volume
Dry Gas
„ Meter
(ft?)
Temp erature
Vacuum
Wet Test
Meter
Pw
(in. li20)
•
Time
o'
(min)
7
Kq "
Wet
Test
Meter
tw
(°F)
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet
Cdi
( 0 F )
Outlet
t-do
(°F)
Average
td
(°F)
cop
0.5
{fo4£ >oo
/ U. 97 7
7S"
l'f.£
iZ:£i
0 /|?5'
0 ¦ 1 ^1"-
t a r t
/)¦!. l//:;
6 040:0 c-
J90. 74 Z.
74'
<%0
•crape
C5) /r
sn$ '
C,{-\
r#
top
1.0
6 O.zo..
20/. iO7
77°
<3 2.46
•
o, oo
2 //- £7^
?Z
9 0
it.oo
/j:/o
c.n\
c, )57
;art
m <¦'!
» k 1 «v ) ( /•
6o /jO. a o
2
v\
top
3.0
Co~)o. oo
22i - ?-/£
*2
%c/.oc>
jO'So
' r
/¦ f)C} !
('. i 6
/
/
( ' r'r-'
tart
/)/!.(¦>*>
£oC,0-Oc>
.*'/£
7o
9 Z
&o
. oS
'crajje
now oo
/0.4ZC -
*
\\
s\
cop
4.0
/ '.
-------
x A'/lO/*'1
^roaetrii ?rcssure Pb ("Hg) 2C7* ^r>
librator 'Oo"
// 4, 2.%4
C %
70.
70
» 0 2.
kvc rage
(5)
'K'J
<\\
Stop
1.0
£/oo.o c
' 2-4. 7.^4
<*o
70
7$\
•
%-.4V
\.b"b-r]
1. -<
d.i?A
Start
i
6o9f'0O
//?, 2?4
6 S
¦74
¦70
¦?z°
, 0 2
\voragc
(5) <
S. oj o. ^
/ •
<\\
AO
'Y-\
S t O D
2.0
& / / O, o~i
/ 34.344
76
Id*
1
k'
/ . • ;
Start
¦ J
<£,/ d>0 >00
/ 24. Z%4
£3"
7o
76c
, 6 2-
Weragc
(10)zo. '
/O .O^oS
f\%
Stop
3.0
£ HO. oo
144. 4 30
c/o
%o
/0 '. 3*
1. c, 1!
Start
£//#. O %
HC*
76°
W°
,OJL
Wer age
(10y/.
-------
PITOT TUUE CALIBRATION
ci-test" °-!'9
C a 1. L b r a t o >: :
A. ^ s t a
APtest
P i L o t T u a e T y p *
C*
P i t o t T11 b 3 N o .
Standard Pi tot Tube, i.'o .
Date: i'Xz 77 ? ' y .-'j Client: £ !/\>-
An t i c i p a ted
A Pstd
0.02
0 . OA
0.06
0 .OS
0 .10
0.12
0.16
0 .20
0.30
0.50
0 .70
0 . 80
APstd
A
<9
APfcest
A c
P te s t
£
A p
test
0 .
0.053?
0 .
0.
0-/Q-7?
0 .
0 .
0 .
o.32££
o.
. OS^fC?
o. QX7
0.
o. ft 7 'rQ
o.
o.
0 . / -6"7? ;-S
0
0 ______
0 .
0- &J23
0 .
0 i
u • oft
0 .
0.
o.
0 .
vj
j.S3Q
o. y / o
o.
o.
o._
o. $2.5
o.
u
0.
y
0 .
0 .
o. 015$
o.
o.
o. /r^
0.
0.
0 .
0. 5TOZ
0 .
0 .
Ac
P t e 5 f;
0 .
0.
0-_Jiz£/
0 .
0 .
o y
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
o .9 0- ¦
0 . S 9- • •
i ¦ " -•
n.ss — -
o .87---: ¦ • -
o . 8 &—
0 .83-
0 . o t -
o.s:; — -
!
0,02 —
o. •
o . .';o_ .
i
0 . 0 i
—:p.—"—: rp- "T.'-i'
.. .. i ..... ; .
• :y-
5 •:
.
i -
. r:
... t • i
; ,
• r-;r/ r •: : -
'¦! : i ; !- .
....
i'--"i
• ;¦
rr.-> 1¦
¦
0
I
0 .
I ' r "
02 0.03 0.04 0.06
-r
i
0 - 1
! . . ..
"4"..::
-Tv3-
I
0 . 2
..... j , },
0.30.40.5 1.0
Al'tost ("il20)
Clayton Environmental Consultant::
-------
/\ Ps td
Pitot Tube Type
Pitot Tube No. [0
C =0.99
ptest aI a" Standard Pitot: Tube No.
Calibrator: R T Cv-i-T^o Date: 10/~7 J'-*> Client: DOS.4.- ?.p A "Tg^C A.*-f
' ' ' ^ ' 1 ' 1 " •" ' — '~ ~ ~ r '*
Vcwvjo
Anticipa ted
/S Ps td
/S. Ps td
A 0
B j($
/\ Ptest
^ ^P tes t
/S. Ptest
^ ^ptest
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 .08
0.10
0.12
0.16
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.70
0.80
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o. C5a
0.
0.
0.01^
0. \ ^
0. OS"5?
o.ml
0.
0.
0.
0. 0^4-
0.
0.
b. (33-
o. <33^
o.O^
0. IBS
0. 33b *
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0. 3so •
0.
0.
0.
0.
o. 35"r
o. M-QM-
0. SW
0.
0.
o
•
..0
O
0.
0.
m i.3io
0.3*3/
o.qq i
M i.mo
o.SSCT
o.
0.
0.90^="
0.89-
0.88-
0.87-
0.86-
0.85-
0 . 8^:
r
&
-G
j :
:v:p
.— • *- »-*•
T-
n i-:'
kn *
Hli
•::: .rli.
WA
n:
::: ;
HiT
TTTT
iiii
nil
¦ZTl
¦ V'
r.v.
trr?
!!::
in;;
n':
ujt
i
1:'r:
u:i
mw
-7* —-r
I
$.
ri-
:x
i-i
¦i-
::::
0.83
0.82 —
0.81 —7-
0.80
:!.:
i ! ?!
: h •
:i!
ILL
: ; : ;
: : ::
iili
I !!
!i:
l-ut
Uil
I'.:;
rrrr
::i:
1
0.01
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2
Ptest ^ N 2 ^ )
0.3 0.4 0.5
1.0
-------
L i 1 U J. XUl>j_« Oa.blU(\/U 1UU
'Ptest
- 0.99
Ap*td
APt'est
Calibrator:
Pi tot Tube Type
Standard Pitot Tube Mo.
Dace: Cc/f / •' Client: /"jr-
Pitot Tube No. /^?
^ "7 / . *
Anticipated
/A Ps td
1
A P s t- cl
A
0
B
A Ptest
AcPt:est
A P to s t
/\ p t e s t
0.02
o-Oi%¥
o
o. #;*/ "
0.
0.
0.04
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.06
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.08
o. o <0-5'
0 . O "?,?
o . ;?/' .1}
0.07 7g
0. Zik'
0.10
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.12
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.16
o. / 0 i xY
0. /
0.
n ; U
u • / .v 7
. fj
0. >// /
0.20
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.30
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.50
0. 3 7/?
0. jT
0. g/'f
0. £
0. : -
i
—:
-------
c = 0.99
P t e s t
/\Ps td
Pitot Tube Type
Pitot Tube No.
Apt
est
Standard Pitot Tube I?o.^
>
Calibrator :RT Date : [Q !I~1'-o Client: Dn\ - f.P A i QS l\ ^
Anticipa ted
A Ps td
A Pstd
A
o
B
^Pte s t
A Cptest
Z\ P t e s t
A ^p te s t
0.02
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.04
o. 0^4
o. oik
o. 334"
o. 07U
o.
0.06
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.08
0.
0.
0.
1
0.
0.
0.10
o. OH*
0.
0.
0. \Dl
0. <831 y
0.12
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.16
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.20
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.30
0 • 3 h In
o. FilO
0.
0. ffiO
o. s?>q 7
0.50
0.
0.
0.
0.
* ^
0.
0.70
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.80
sa i.mi
m iM?)
0. sjv
o.-shct
0.9Q-
0.89-
0 .88
0.87
0.86
0.85
0.84-!—
til
"TV
z-:z
It!:
:r.
:Sr,
:t"
: •;.
".xr;
!-KHr
M:!
i:
in
riLM
iili
0.83-j
0.82'-—
0.81
0.80 —
¦i—»
W
: 4 - »¦
r.! : t
-Sri-
:: :::
WW
:ni
"1:
TtTT
rrr*
hriS
::::
~r
3
: ! !
!*:
i±
i • •
; : :
!ii;
m
: : : :
: f»
Si!
; ;
rrrr
i:;
::i:
1
0.01
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2
/\ Ptcst ( H2®^
0.3 0.4 0.5
1.0
-------
C •. 0.9 9
P ti e *•> i.
Ap': t-d
Fitot Tube TyI'f-
>S"
Pi tot Tube Ho . /c(
\J APtcot
C a 115; r (; o r £// ¦ -
S t:a nc! a r: cl Pilot Tube i! o .
D « t e : /£/£ /p>£ CI lent: /^/ic^ ^r/g>/ "".2 $
Anticipatcc.
A Pstd
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.16
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.70
0.80
A P t; t d
A
0
M
1
A Ptost
^ ^Ptest
A P lGS L
Acptest
0. ojo
o.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0. ¦
0.
0.
0.
1
0.
0.
0. JGC
0.
0. $3^
0.
0. /4&
*-JLZJC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0. •
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.39'z
o. .-^"3.6
o. 9 ^ '^
0. SZC
0 . S'^s"
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0. __
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0. i.A7C
0 . $ 2
o. \.474
0.
0 .9 Op""
0.891- -"-.-TT r
0.88-——
0. S7
0.8 6 — --
0.8 5-
0.8'>
! I
:=\^:
-Lm-;:
; - -i • "t
iTTz- J:
i. ; I
:(t!
; j:
r. r;
i J .1.
. i.
~:TT
jr:
: fi
HrY
Hi"!
;: i;
: i! >
;i!i
• i».
:i:
i -
—i—,
ill:
liil
I1.'
,?>» ~
0.8 3 -
V f// p-
<¦
0.51-
O.c'.O,-
0 . 0 }.
0.0 7: 0.0.3 O.O-'t
: iU4i M i.
: i : I
I I ; :
• » » 1
i ;
» » * i
:j u
l_LJ
TiiT
liii
~ i • i
mi
Mli
sili
¦" ¦ r-
'Mi
:f!i I!
or,
A »'r.
0. 1
: I:
ill
i!:
0.2 0.3 O.A 0.5
1 . 0
¦„t (">I;>0)
-------
/\Ps td
C„_ » 0.99 '
Pitot Tube Type 5 Pitot Tube Ho » (^
Ptest ^ j ^ptegt Standard Pitot Tube No
Calibrator:& TT Da te : lofelk/lln Client: QftV^ To^k 3-*4
' \ I _ t
V/fi *>-VY\q s\'i.
Anticipa ted
ZS. Ps td
/\ P K r rl
A
CD
B
A
APtest
^^Ptest
/S. Ptest
A ^ptes t
0.02
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.04
o.
o. nm
0.
-------
Stc;.;:" °-99
A1'"
A p tcnt
Ca 11 bra-tor : /£/£. .
l'itot Tube Type! Pi cot Tube- Ho , 2-3
S t n ii d u r d P11 o l" Tube II o . ^
D t e : /o/c/?^ C lien L : "
An tic ipated
A Ps td
A P f; t d
0.02
°- o S-Z-
0.04
0.
0.06
o.
0.08
0.
0,10
o. jo£
A
A
Ptes t
Ac
Ptest
©
A?
t C S
Ac
Ptest
0.12
0.16
0.20
0.30
0 .50
0.70
0.80
0._
0.
0.
0. 3V7-
0.
0.
0. I.OjC
0- OJO
0
0
0.
0. /So
0 .
0. _
0.
0 . S C
0 .
0 .
0. /.49JL
o. 849t
0.^
0
0.
o- 9JZ
0.
0.
0.
l£f&
0
0.
0-£i^
iy
0 * O .'^O
0
0.
%
0.
0- /S'O
0.
0 .
0.
0 . jr3' y
0.
0.
o. 1-4^0
o.
0.
0
0.
0>
0.
0 .
0.
0 . tr 45
0.
0. •
0. $zc
\
I
I
I
I
. 9 op-
.ssLi
. 88p
. 87K-
. 8 6 J-—^
.8 51--;--
. SA
. 8 3 -
,o?y
4-
0 . ('¦ ]
:: I
i -
iiii
3Z~
: I
i —r
y.'.'i
l_L
m
:i:*:
\-
:;vh:.
.j. ..,.
t: jrf- i •
a.i I
:i -i
; i
|i i ;
I i i !
i.-vTTT
rr
: :! i
:JLL
i i
t » » t
; : i i
*:rii
LUi
'» ! \
~ r- «
lit;
; i < l
11:1
;: n
! I
0.0 2 0.03 0.0-';
06
A i'
.Li LLL
0.1 0.2
tc«t ("1'20)
: U
• » ~ 1
iiii.
• ii.
jj-j i
'M
n!
* i • I
L!i!
iiii
MM
Hi;
iii
llLL
0.3 0.A 0.5
1 . 0
-------
c - 0-99
Ptest
APstd
Pitot Tube Type
Pitot Tube No. Q3
Standard Pitot Tube No.
Ca1ibra tor: R T Gvi-f-P.'A Date: {pJx'J.lU Client: Qfy^rr. - VjV f\ Tor tC
VewvxOA, tr
Anticipa ted
Ps td
A Ps td
A
©
B
A
APte s t
^cPtest
A Ptest
A^Ptest
0.02
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 i 04
o. OR3-
o. oi n
0.
0. 014
o.
0.06
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.08
0.
0.
0.
1
0.
0.
o
•
M
O
o. io t
0. 143.
0. MS ''
0. I4-I
0. V
0.12
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.16
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o
CM
•
o
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.30
0.^3) •
0.
0. %%<\ '
0. S^'n
0.^/'
0.50
0.
0.
0.
0.
% •
0.
0.70
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.80
0. <\U
ffl I.M4-R
o.8£i *
Si 1.^1
0. *&*+'
0.90-^
0.89
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.85
0.84
0.83
0.82
0.81 —
0.80
0.01
f;
rb
:::
1
^5
-* —
.vSg
•izu-i-r
ML
: .4 '-
: r:
; :
1 in
.-.r:
"Til
i ; rr.
1 ! ii
Ml!
i i i:
mm
XL: i
i^d
m
iri!
¦i !.?:
mi
':::
i!!l
ii
• "IT
i!r!
iiil
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2
A Ptcot
ili]
t!
rr:
n!i
Mil
Mr
:;: I
ii::
HI!
§
MM
nil
iiil
•Hr
:4:,'
it:;
:ri;
?*
X
2.
0.3 0.4 0.5
- : 'i
JJ
1.0
-------
APPENDIX H
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
Nomencla ture
2
A„ » Stack area, inches
s '
Cf = Front half (probe & filter) particulate concentration,
gr/DSCF
Cp = Pitot tube correction factor, dimensionless
Ct = Total particulate concentration, gr/DSCF
CHj = Front half (probe & filter) particulate concentration,
mg/DSm^
CM(- = Total particulate concentration, mg/DSm^
Dn = Sampling nozzle diameter, inches
ERf * Emission rate of front half particulate, lb/hr
ERfc = Emission rate of total particulate, lb/hr
F.RMf = Emission rate of front half particulate, kg/hr
ERMt = Emission rate of total particulate, kg/hr
- Mole fraction of dry gas, g/g-mole
MW = Molecular weight of wet stack gas
MW^ = Molecular weight of dry stack gas
P^ * Barometric pressure, inches mercury
Pm = Average orifice pressure drop, inches water
Pg = Absolute stack gas pressure, inches mercury
Pst = Static pressure of stack gas, inches mercury
Qg = Dry stack gas flowrate at standard conditions, DSCFM
SWj = Front half sample weight, mg
SWt = Total sample weight, mg
Tm = Average meter temperature, °F
Tg = Stack temperature, °F
Tt = Net time of test, minutes
Vm - Volume of dry gas at meter conditions, ft^
-------
- 2 -
Vm = Volume of dry gas at standard conditions, DSCF
s t d
V s = Stack gas velocity at stack conditions, fpm
Vw = Total condensate collected in sampling train, ml
V., *= Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, SCF
gas
AP = Velocity pressure, inches water
"i I ~ Percent of isokinetic variation, d imens ionless
%M - Percent moisture, dimensionless
Calculation of Particulate Emissions
The dry volume of sampled gas corrected to standard condi-
tions of 20°C and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg) is calculated as fol-
ious: p
V„ . = V„ * Pb +(,-7376- .
g t(J —
T + 460
m
The dry stack gas flowrate corrected to standard conditions is
calculated using the following set of equations sequentially:
Vw « 0.04 71 * V
wga s v
100 * Vw
IK
V + V
mstd wga s
100 - %M
Md fOO
MWd = (%C02 * 44/100) + (%02 * 32/100) + [(%C0 + %N2) *28/10o[
-------
MW = (MWd * Md) + 18(1 - Md)
Ps " Pb + Pst
5120.8 * C * 1/ap * (T + 460) *-,/ 1
p V s s V Ps *
* MW
0.1225 * V * A * M * P
s s d s
_____
s
The equation employed to determine percent of isokinetic
variation is:
1032 * (To + 460) * V
7.i . !
V, * Tt « P, * Md * CDn)2
To determine the concentration of particulate matter in
grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/DSCF), one of the fol-
lowing equations is used:
SW-
C£ = 0.01543 * —ri — and
mstd
SW..
ct = 0.01543 * — — .
s td
When metric units are desired, the concentration is calcu-
lated in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/DSm3) as fol-
lows :
SWf
sw_
CMf " (0 .02832) (Vm and
CM
t (0.02832)(V )
s td
-------
- 4 -
Front half particulate concentrations are obtained by summing the
weight of particulate matter collected on the filter and all por-
tions of the train preceding it. Total particulate concentration
includes, in addition, any particulate matter collected in the
imp inge rs.
The emission rate of particulate matter can be calculated
from the filterable or total particulate concentration using one
of the following equations:
ERf « 0.00857 * Cf * Qs and
ERt = 0.00857 * Ct * Qs .
For metric units,
ERMf - (1.70 * 10"6) * CMf * Qs and
ERMt - (1.70 * 10"6) * CMt * Qs .
To avoid rounding errors it is preferable to carry out the calcu-
lation of concentration and emission rate in one operation.
-------
su:-:-v,ry
PXCOP.O OF VISIBLE EMI SSI oris'
Type of Plant fi'V-v.--1W. s i /V \T Date IC - tC ) £
Company Name BfVS\"^rU ' Hours of Observation
¦ Xl^c. pL^-Mr 1
~Observer ^ LLft-
Plant Address
Type of Discharge^STACK/ OTHER
Discharge Location n,x ¦>K,.j CTL^T" pLu/y)C-~ 0* SVo f^uj
Height of Point of Discharge
Observer's Location: • I
Distance to Discharge Point foorr
Height of Observation Point
Direction from Discharge Point
Background Description \\ \U<-s if T\^-cu^*>
msC
Weather-: Clear (jOvercast J) Partly Cloudy Other
Hind Direction '2~°lC /UiJ V/ind Velocity
PI uma Description:
Detached: Yes No
Color: Black (White) Other
Color
mi/hr
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Futnigating Other dooL.0 TUfTTt^L
Estimated Distance Plu;r.5 Visible \ PF
Sunsnary of Observations:
Opacity Aggregate Tir-e Q Qjacitv
0* min. sec.
5
10
.15
20
25
30
35
<0
45
50
O.o?citv Acoreo.itc fir.:e ft On^city
55
60
65
70
75
.80
C5
90
95
100
-------
^ 'V C 1 t—^T\D
.'At- ^ ^ »
\ 'ViSnno JC _XC?
.-0";V
•^— 1 s*i
N. -
Company flame
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Date I 0 "~~ P
Observeri ;-LL:aj-VeT
Ce ^ t'-A**"
££, Stack Location s o \- Ql-l-iot • Observer s . , ¦- r
Location \ ^ O /
Weather Conditions O l/ v3-L CCv t> l
Q
S- 35 TIME
comments
HR
Mlrl
il
Cc-lt><
00
uu
o
1 J
©
c
C
I'wCi i= S.> jrm>H1 w^vrta -** f
i O'-'M vw^wi
01
o
O
*
o
hll^Oci-ea RdcuiliM'-k _ Vx.CK C-.V^m") Il>VI'S1«/VA
02
C
O
c
C
t/uci'v ^r^ck-
03
0
O
%
o
y *
04
O
0
0
4
O ivietL/M. ^5 /U~iVl ^ "VthcX
05
O
*
o
0
\
06
c
G
0
07
#-
c
•
08
O
o
5"
o
5f) V5 Qc^Ld /UcT* ^^HtrK-e^r/Sj/Oi
10
G
*
O
o
7
J1
&
c
%
o
-sv— iVr Cc-u ;w~ &.->
12
0
0
o
o
^ i
13
o
r
7^
14
*
o
o
o
1
?dab
15
o
c
o
o
£;5D P-l sX)\ied Otijrfc)
26
O
0
o
*-
•
27
O
0
*
0
t
28
0
0
0
o
*
29
•—-i
o
D
?
-------
<_ P. A-v
Tji-T Company Name
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Dote IO"
^ I
CjCi^ Plant Address
pm.
[V "y/V
-fnr
C-'-i A or~ t}<~ «'°r
Stack Location i ri-\ i
Weather Conditions
Observer /)l, S<4CCA
Observer's
Location
uLa_SaiaUPOS~
TiTTT
TIKE
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
39
40
4L
42
43
44
45
45
48
49
50
51
52
55
56
57
5H
59
38
a.
00
o
u
o
o
&
Q.
1
0
'""i
O
0
C2
O
U
O
o
1
©
O
0
O
&
ic
ol
O
O
n
Q
0
9 -.ofr
_SEf.o:;DS
15 I 30
u
O
O
c;
c
6-
o
o
c
c
1
o
u
G
a
o
o
o
*
o
£
o
0
o
6"
D
D
o
o
o
C
o
O
o
o
D
£
o
o
s*
(9
O
•is
5
u
0
a
a
o
o
T
o
o
a
o
c
o
£1
C
£2
c
o
a
o
£L
O
a
o
CL
G
0
T"
U
comments
.0*
P.J
#/y (a)
Pl/c £*=•<£
^ 6
nfrs (<;
(S") |°v-L3V^
l^i-icdL -&/p- Cs)
o uu>ea lS^A, *
p^u/vi ^ L-ti- ^r$
CI/mM" He in*
-------
13per yO. RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
— V-- Company fiame tfmww yyu- Date I O ^ ^
Plant Address
UJ
Stack Local ,
Heather Conditions O ^ ">7
^f/CTUYi-- Ci=' ,»,w . (_0 ,«-<>
Stack Location K,
Observer , -C^£(,-Or #7, ^v
Observer's , , * r
Location V ^ ^*' ? L_ 160T"?
HR
H!;l
il
00
CC::5<
15
30
45
Xr vl r»c"V A. JXcnUflviiiiKW^
00
O
0
c
o
•
01
(o)
0
0
a
P<- «- br-d (fcj
02
n
o
0
o
03
G
o
o
c
04
O
o
0
o
•
<4?
O
%
e
D
*
06
r
¦0
e>
0 \
07
.0
o
o
o
08
0)
o
c
o
09
o
o
10
o
c
|A^e(( l-h/y^k)
c
o
W
6
^LSt?d
•
12
o
<3
o
C
13
o
O
*
14
0
0
o
15
&)
0
D
f9Jt-$e
21
c
o
a lc
22
o
o
c
0
- 23
o
6
0
o
24
•d
0
c)
•
25
o
(£}
0
P^bCd t'bl+'L. ( f;)
\
26
n
0
0
o
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name «/gSM 7&JU)ote I ^
Plant Address Observer f-^c'* > C
st4Ck locat,on °?^inos 'nso'iis- Tr—fef;:a
Weather Conditions ~\-
TU'E \ O OS* COISIENTS
HR
run
00'
s:c
is
o:;ds
30
45
-*%:
-
50
o
0
o
0
••
51
c
W
p
c
nn-?(ci)
52
0
O
0
p,L fr) •
_53
&
o
o
o
54
o
O
o
XT
55
o
o
O-
•
56
£»
o
O
o
fvLjCd -'J/it-Cfj
57
fr)
o
O
ik
1
<
5ft
©
o
o
O
/ ' V ¦ . 11
59
0
ik
O
•
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
UJ
V
Company Home
Plant Address
- ><^
Date / &
5 . Observer
- O f ft >-1 L TT
^ Stack location -y,-^ ir..yA$ ^fL' I^S^T
Weather Conditions CV ^ 5 ( _
TTTTT
10\ 3$^ time
00
01
02
secc::os
00
0
15
o
CJ
D
30
o
o
45
&
o
coMMEfrrs
<3 c^v ? trt-.c. /
fjUcrcL- (*>)
03
o
o
cT
04
o
c?
.05
a
0
06
o
0
c_
e
o
o
0
c
j?o<- Se^_ Q/^^o \
o
C>(
Q
o
*
o
(7
(pj
o
0
o
O
S t-'cf ^ c)
O
o
O -fe
la
o
o
o
0
o
f0^5a£ Qfl-jJio)
O
O
O
©
20
o
T O
SbMLfc)
2T
O
d»r
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
O
o
e
/o;j~7 enp of oawftvK
?9
i ¦
-------
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
(J)
company Name (DtoT>a*J> TEC-COate 0 ^ (o
Plant Address Observer (-jfSlwCfj-*5. JlO. C c_
Scr <&foo djL
v>- cuspt3
Stack Location
Cj£r**s*-»r- Oin«-CJ&
¦» iwiCoi^y
Weather Conditions J (f S 1 l*-fVifo
" HR
Mffl
SEC
,c;:ds
«»¦ .SiAT oTNu^ C-vvusJ.d VJ *
p J
....
9
U*J
0
n
4
0
r z~-
3^
0
G
A /
0
•
0
o
o
-
\r
O)
#*-
O
0
o
1 X
<9
o
*8
ft
» C^7^-T<^p r* - -¦
3^
C
0
O
b
3K
o
O
o
36,
o
G
o
c
39k
t>1
o
o
o
(bn-^fo)
4o
(?)
0
0
J ' ? >
rw £Vfv /^o) .
A*
0
(?
o
0
y '
i2
D
o
(n)
f^l~C,ecf O
|3
0
O
0
0
y
•
fa
O
0
o
p~>
*5
O
o
ft
0
•
o
r>
0
o
Q)
*
0
o
P«-"-it3r) 04* P
0
*
c
0
1 £ J
0
G
o
0
C
0
0
<2?
-6
o
1
o
34
Y)
0
ft
6-
C?5
0
81
0
e>
f^tSQ? fyfhi If)
«&
0
c
*
o
<9?
0
0
¥)
o
f j/ucp
&
0
a
3?
0
0
*
•
. 1
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company fta/ne glHTfaCiJ T?UX. Date I ^ 6
Plant Address Observer ytf &<¦
tyt-oji-*- .¦
Stack Location Co •'TH&* s <_^'/JS5server's , , yjs-.. _
• /L-r p a ' H-ocaticn JCO 0*( Q O
Weather Conditions C'(ti>-(-4sl <4- f~-/Vi^ . '
Hft
MM
l'2-<\. TIME
' StCC.lDS
• • COMMENTS " •
^0
00
D
IS
©
30
45
o
- .
151
0
O
0
o
O
6
o
G
fu^vQ /*?&? C3
%
©
Q
0
5
0
o
~%r
^ - -.
^6
0
c>
5"
f-x-SaO /Wi
>
&
/0
/
•
>8
0
c>
o
O
1>9
0
o
G
G
Ao
0
o
O
" \
41
0
0
ft)
O
P^us^o /VHi ( a) '
\
^2
0
o
*
*
17 • i
A3
0
o
*>
Po-C^e# rt/iJ'T) ?
o
o
%
' 7 j
45
*
Cmikhin/v' iv~ ixjMf- ' !
46
0
*
/ i
1'
O
O
£>
1
^8
o
5"
D
0
pslSinO 0fa(S) 1
o
0
IT
P
fuL-seP fife /r) !
0
o
O
P)
fuLSt
?uL5e0
£
•o
0
O
0
1/ V ^
is
Q
0
0
Q
,5*6
0
o
to
fuLseO nM/oJ
o
o
o
<9
' 1/ x ' " :
• i
1
58
D
o
0
ft)
fj^biTO
5V
0
0
Q
C
A, ".
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company flame W^a.e /;: --l o >6
Plant Address
(It?N-Tii"! —'^P' tjL • c O/'^' -
Stack Location ^o-X\ ^^Ocp
Weather Conditions C\ i/O^-C
Observer (:-LX)l:^Cr
£>
o
o
02
o
5~
o
0
Put-Sep
03
0
C>
O
c
04
o
6>
o
0
•
05
0
o
0
06
0
&
0{
\J"L>tLV /}?/}£ {ir\
07
0
O
o
0
s !
•
08
°)
o
0
0
pc l /to a ( 0)
09
0
0
o
it
v /
10
0
O
o
o
•
11
o
©
*
1
$
12
o
0
c
Po^Si£Q Sb/i?,(s~) i
13
a
0
o
*
i '/
•
t
1A
O
o
o
1
15
&. (#) j
21
D
o
olo
1*1
22
O
0
0
o
1
i
sw~-
23
0
o
0
0
24
0
0
(5
o
•
25
0
o
o
0
26
0
0
5"
&
piash p j--,,^
27
o
6
o
y • 5
i
28
Q
0
o
•
1
?9
1 <
0
0
o>
c>
?
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name gMTfaBtaJ fhfi+Aje&iri Date \ (J ^ ° ^ _
Plant Address ^ ^^ Observer C
OA
Ml?l
Tlf
E
SEC0::ns
COMMENTS
¦ ¦ ^ ¦ » ¦ i ¦ « ¦ "¦ " ¦ - 1 ^ 1 ¦ ¦ ^
• « • • •
30
00'
o
15
O
30
0
35
o
o
*
h
36
0
0
a
•
37
o
o
o
^t-StrD /3w
38
0
o
O
)
40
o
o
5-
0
Pi,'<-$%. ;/$!
41
)
49
%
0
o
" V"
50
O
0
••
51
o
52
w
o
(9
r-
53
6
©
54
C~>
Q>
o
c>-
55
o
0
'
56
¥
'%
#
(7
•
57
o
O
6>
O
5fl
%
O
o
o
59
£
a
•
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name ID^hOfi+J TfrUJate (0 L°'^
~&9KaT2r£S&
^l'\\
Plant Address
Stack Location
Heather Conditions
Observer
GQ3(to^$\ SaMiilxa
Location I (g »'<*-£>. *-ieoPr
HR
Hl.'ir SECtt&S
1/3-x, (^o^r
00
15
30
45 .
00
n
8
•
01
0
(V
02
O
Ik*
o
03
o
o
0)
O
fot-ieo l3U[°)
04
0
o
O
i&A O/Afjs 2J5~B
05
06
07
\
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
•
' 15
-
16
•
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
•
•
25
\
26
•
27
•
28
'
?9
•
-------
SU>%\3Y
SECOND OF VISI2LE EMI SSI QMS'
Type of Plant
pUA-M"
Date /(ft ~2-t -<7£>
Company Nafr.e
gpf*Zr
Plant Address
Hours of Observation -
~Observer
OTHER
Type of Discharge^STACK
Discharge Location Ait^.ua- fluTurr, c'u*"
Height of Point of Discharge
Observer's Location: i
-toaFT-
Distance to Discharge Point ^
Height of Observation Poin
Direction from Discharge Point tto'ser
Background Description
Weather-: Clear
Overcast
>
Wind Directi on &0'u
No
Other
Plume Dispersion Behavior: Looping Coning Fanning
Lofting Fumigating Other dou^-0 Tte~> *
Estimated Distance Plu,T.e Visible ItFr
Suxnary of Observations:
Opacity
0-
5
10
.15
20
25
30
35
<0
45
50
Aggregate Tire 0 Opacity
min. sec.
Qpjcitv Aggregate fi.vs fl Opacity
55
60
65
70
75
.80
B5
90
95
100
-------
RECORD 0." VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name [Vfir*} j;/tSV'A\ Date i 0 ^ ^
Plant Address
c^zr^xzyi-o^ f}<- n?rT
Stack Location of-
Observer&<£OU-i? M -SA^LA'c(- 4"
_ „ — [Uo°Sg A^io^rfjcj^
Weather Conditions — \t— (A-1 i/Q L/Jv^
HR
,M[N
TIMF
SttcrioS
COMMENTS -
a VWA/oT (LuPMJ /2>Th(/^ izAAit 0V=> lJ~*
00
00
o
15
o
30
©
OS
01
5
c?
G
fjibiZQ fytw KfT)
02
0
0
o
t>
0
0
07
0
O
o
0
•
08
0
c
O
6
09 !
r0)
c?
0
f^eO ( 0 \
10
e
(o\
0
1bMCd\ :
11
0
0
o
U :
•
1?
o
0
£>
0
j
13
D
o
C5)
0
fix.5, eft (vmfo\ r
14
0
O
O
x>
• T' t
15
C?
D
c?
6
•!
16
ip'
0
£
!
17
0
0
Q
0
T ' I
18
Qs
o
0
0
I
19
£L
0
V
o
i
i
20
0
CM
O)
21
O
"p
ok?
iy
22
0
D
0
i
23
&
0
0
Q
fjUM. bute)
24
d
0
D
o
V "
25
o
6
0
0
26
o
o
0
0
•
27
4)
Q
o
o
• •
*
28
O
O
o
p]
ll^&k ,?v;LStr0 /WtM
?9
r- 1 —<
o
0
0
0
-------
RECORD OF VISIOLE EMISSIONS (3
Company Name Date (b~H~lC> „
ji- Plant Address^^^ Observer f l^-O^S jfjf|>
, Or u&Jsabv* .aujvK
» suet Location I U O 0 lT A g>. ^jbi>]ff>^ ¦
Heather Conditions p»-rr I Aj o-aU£TS7/j-MA
%)Q TUT ' CO.£1ENTS
HR
Ml ft
30
00'
0
SEC
15
o
-or.-ns
30
0
45
D
__ ¦
31
0
a
0
0
•
32
0
0
O
o
*
33
p
a
o
O
34
0
0
0
rsW D
35
0
0
0
0
j « i g x
36
0
Q
o
(O)
37
'€>
<0
o
O
1 >J .
38
5"
0
0
0
39
0
c
C
0
1 v J-
/
40
cfi
O
o
ft^iS# fifiSfl?]
.41
0
o
o
fVU^O? KYV^fa)
42
0
o
o
o
^ 1
43
0
0
o
O
•
44
o
e>
0
O
45
0
0
0
M!h( 0)
46
0
£>
©
47
-o
0
O
0
.
48
0
0
0
o
^£
fyu-sdD rcfyftoi
51
o
c9
e
o
52
P.
0
o
o
i
53
o\
0
D
54
d
p
0
©•
5r,
to
0
o
^ts£o aa*t^
56
o
o
0
57
e
0
0
5fl
0
D
0
0
59
0
0
0
O
•
-------
6
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISS.ONS
Date
Observer fri/P ^(rif f^\ < $
Company l!ame
plant Address
ry^uUo.-h . \
Stack Location e^nUTh OP ( OL/n-KVl Observer's „ ^
' ' Location //.fl SC of IfrpAo^trQ
Weather Conditions ^ A ^ ^
(C 6 0T fjKev) (jjr,
HR
°[\0£> time
MM SSCC.-JDS
COMMENTS
00
00
c
IS
V
30
ft
•J 5
D
1 -
01
b
o
©
0
02
0
Q
o
(
03
{y)W£r)
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS ^
Company Name Dote l.d-t t ~~l (, ^
Plant Address^^^*^"* ' Observer (rU?OYtCrti (ft»
C,mktsf~OP OiAvOiW '
Stack Location g />i/TK /QS fpi/Cx^fury . Observer s
a A . , , i .t I Location __
Weather Conditions r-M" I »Vj V-V/>'!a^/ f 1 * * ^ ^
n ^ I *
c
HR
^c
Mlfl
Tir
E
Sl(
o:;os
COWEHTS
i/y ^
- • •• •
30
'JO
o
J i>
o
J J
O
c
^ —
31
0
0
o
o
32
0
0
o
o
*
33
o
0
O
o
/
34
fr
o
9
r*.
.35
0
o
o
0
(/ ^
36
o
o
o
a
%
37
5"
0
0
D
fyfi# (S™/
38
O
0
o
0
r
...
39
o
fa
0
o
40
o
0
0
o
41
O
0
0
(X
f-:y' :LO:) "'/h. &
42
D
o
o
0
43
0
0
o
o
•
44
o
0
o
c
•
45
0
o
~C>
0
*
46
6
o
(0}
0
PuUStstf /Wffl]
47
0
c?
o
0
fy \ ... - -. ,
48
0
o
0
o
49
0
o
o
o
.
50
0
o
0
;0^
poUt
55
0
o
o
o
i
56
o
o
0
0
•
57
o
0
0
o
5fl
o
o
o
o
/
59
s
o
o
o
-------
• -
i ' Company flame
)7 s» Ar*^ant Addres
> l©®tr cc*fte<»» uc-
Stack Location j^jXfcv-ltoiLi
7^ Weather Conditions fa-Ov.
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
fl/esift
(5
Date r~zr^Sk [ 0 ^tt\
------- |